Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006/04/26 - Agenda Packet • L J THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA jZANCHo CUCAMONGA APRIL 26, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart _ Vice Chairman Macias _ Fletcher _ McPhail _ Munoz II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 26, 2005 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned mdiv~duals may voice their opinion of the related protect Please wait to be recognrzed by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be I~m~ted to 5 minutes per individual for each pro/ect Please sign m aRer speaking A LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2006-00226 -JACK HALL - A request to alter the historic Stoebe House to include an exterior staircase for fire accessibility on the rear elevation of the existing home, designated as a Historic Landmark, located at 6710 Beryl Street in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwellings per acre) APN 0202-461-65 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303, conversion of an existing small structure Related File Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01173 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION - AGENDA ~,oHO APRIL 26, 2006 C`x"r'oNCe Page 2 V. COMMISSION BUSINESS VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS, This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lots J Schrader, Plamm~g Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Apnl 20, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic CenterOnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~ Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is m session Copies of the Plamm~g Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http•llwww.ci rancho-cucamonaa.ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to partiapate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired • Vicinity Map ~istoric Preservation Commission April 26, 2006 Q ~ Meeting Location• N City Hall • 10500 Civic Center Dnve T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: April 26, 2006 TO. Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY: Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2006-00226 -JACK HALL - A request to alter the historic Stoebe House to include an exterior staircase for fire accessibility on the rear elevation of the existing home, designated as a Historic Landmark, located at 6710 Beryl Street in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwellings per acre) APN: 0202-461-65 This project is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act • (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303, conversion of an existing small structure Related Fde~ Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01173. BACKGROUND: A Historical Sianificance~ The Stoebe House was constructed in 1895 by J P. Cutler and his wife Mr Cutler, who was a stone mason, bwlt the stone cooler and fireplaces himself The ranch was sold to George M. Braxton in 1908 He owned the property until 1912, when it was sold to the Charles Stoebe family The Stoebe family was an active estrus rancher involved in the community. All six Stoebe children went to school in the Alta Loma area. The home is quite unique because of the Queen Anne style architecture with detailed wood siding, unique carved gable peaks, and a small front porch which wraps around the north side of the home. B Site Characteristics The house sits on a 1 4 acre parcel at the southwest corner of 19th Street and Beryl Street surrounded by vacant property, which was once a portion of the original ranch property The land use, zoning of the site, and the surrounding property are Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). The property is relatively flat and gently slopes to the south. ANALYSIS. A. General The majority of the two-story dwelling home is wood sided with a hipped roof, side gables, and a composite roof. At one time, a garage existed on-site, however, it since blew down as a result of a windstorm. Two-story bay windows are located within the • Item A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LANDMARK ALTERATION DRC2006-00226 -JACK HALL April 26, 2006 • Page 2 gable extensions The original corner brackets are carved in a sunburst pattern; the remaining portion of the home, which is not sided, has wood clapboard. A front porch extends around the front and north sides of the home. There is a decorated frieze under the porch roof, tying into the porch supports. A small, single-story extension to the rear has a second story, enclosed sun porch There are no significant landscape features on site B Landmark Designation: The property was designated a City Historic Landmark on August 15, 1984 At that time, it was reviewed and found that it met the criteria of the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance including, historical, cultural, and community sernng. C Landmark Alteration• The owner has requested approval to make an exterior change to the Stoebe House in conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit for office use of the historic home. According to Fire Code exiting standards, the conversion from a residence to an office occupancy regwres adding a staircase to the second floor that meets the Fire Department requirements The owner has submitted plans for the staircase to be added to the exterior west elevation of the home. The owner is proposing wood construction, to match the existing materials Lastly, an ADA ramp must also be installed to the first floor entry door on the west elevation. D. Secreta of the Interior's Standards for Historic Rehabilitation The City follows the • standards set forth by the Secretary of the Interior which states, in part, that "new additions should be designed and constructed so that the character-defining features of the historic building are not radically changed, obscured, damaged, or destroyed in the process of rehabilitation. New design should always be clearly differentiated so that the addition does not appear to be part of the historic resource.° Staff believes that adding the staircase inside the home would have altered character-defining interior spaces The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Rehabilitation acknowledged that exterior stairs and ADA ramps are common alterations needed for adaptive reuse of landmarks that will result in their continued preservation The proposed location of the staircase and ADA ramp at the rear of building are consistent with these standards E. Environmental Assessment• This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332, infill development. FACTS FOR FINDING: Landmark Alteration 1. Findm The action proposed is consistent with the purpose of this ordinance. FacUs: The landmark alteration, as presented, will promote the continued use of the Stoebe House. 2 Findm The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest of value of a historic nature • ~" -~- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LANDMARK ALTERATION DRC2006-00226 -JACK HALL • April 26, 2006 Page 3 FacUs The proposed addition of an exterior stairway to gain additional access on the rear elevation of the Stoebe House is compatible and wdl enhance the continued use of the Stoebe House. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Valley Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend approval of Landmark Alteration DRC2006-00226 to be forwarded to the City Council forJna~action ~~ Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC EC/ge • Attachments Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Draft Res r~ I• J - Location Map - Photographs of Residence - Site Plan - Floor Plans - Perspectives - Elevations - Framing Plan olution of Approval for DRC2006-00226 ~- :3 u• +1 , , , ~, ,, 1 - ,iii il-ilii. ;- ;l;i ; ! i '~ ii Il 1 ii f 11 ,{ , i ,f 111 lh 11+ 1,+iii tl i f 1 i it iliiil~ +' 1-1 !t ll 1 , ii'll lli 1 , !!f• iet.Ji• fltl :11 ~'. J={ "111- +fiil; ,;! ~iallilil-ll~9 ;lilift 11; ;t ~ iitJl ° l•'il-,ff~{;l ~~ ,iii jli!lilal~jfliff li~li li-fflikgff~~'1-1ifi?i~jir q +„I X1111;ii~Ilill,lill~l•1•'li-lilliiiflilllilii ilil i j it-~ili1, ; ;Ijli ];il if 111 11;111911 °~ i i, lhi:f! I Il iji i°ii 11 it+!i fliij; t r' t 1i - ~- ~ -{i1 Ji ~ , II lii ,9 is 11 Ifj, i'jli~i~t 1 tll F Ili i• l~ 1. i .., 1 1! 1 1 i I ~ ii~la L €~{ tii i{l'ifi' Jfllfilll~fl9~ji1t1111i#1H-Ji'lill E1: E4 Eilll E~itii 11 iil:llt+t,lii,wtlitl. f 3 c ii • ~~ r lii- ~Il 1 ~ ' 1: i'I 1 il•. i +; 1l; !;' i;il i - ,tiff 11.1 { I l f l+, it ~ i i e- { i it 111 !l 1 ll~;if {,; t~ F ii ~1i, ~;!fililif'1~ f~ lip 1-Ji 1-1Fi fiii~; l'-'l~iff lllli"i I,1tlt ii!i i1f ijltii-+flflji~ltll~jiii~ iiil/lillil Eil! t,+hilii,tllll ! i111-' f ii ~ i;fi N l i- ~ ~t iu i•t I;IIE{1~ ~j;114'il~;~.li li; !f'liil~ii il)lff~~+iJnJilli,f;lilfif iif11},)ll ff i#,I, ii E ii, ill li,l ii ill E i, ill iil! S. S^ '~. ~ ~-'_ Y ~ 1 \ ~n' ~ ~(r' 1 °~5 i 1v~1n\\ 1 u u /'1--<a ~__ I~ ~~ ~~ I J `~ I I ~ ~~ I i, ~ '~ C~ W / 6 ~ •0-,~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~- ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ , 1 \ a ~~~: ~•J7 \~• f0~ ~i L~; „Z-,91 t .O-,LI 17~ ~ ~ t~ rJ'~~rs -`~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ I~ C g .L-,I I ~' ~, . .. .. _ _ .. I~' _ _ ~ o ® G ~ N ~~ A"7+ E y1 y p.~ 8 ~ ^ Q 3 a S w~ _ ~ ® : _ ! ~ ~ ! ~ ~ J ! _= 3 ~ _ ~ _ ,~ q,ll k ~ ~ v ~ i , I~ ; ~ n~ t --- --- -------- ~;I_; - x ~ ~ ~ ! ~ : , ~~ ~ t t ~1~lpl~a'lit:~~ f ~~~ TP ~} ~~ fe !J J ! ~~ ~~~~~ i~~E~ i~,E } a JJJ ivt.as~J~~~ n 1 3 _ ~ !; I 1 8 ~ ~ p. ~E °Q ~e ^ ~ : ! ~!!J e e e J o a !! Js S SS ~! 1 -- ~ ! { ~,` S E S 3 Z ~ ~ _ : ~ '" a e U U ~ ~' ~ ,~ 0 a t, ~: ,~;, ~~ ! ~ w ~-' ~~~:~ ~,~ . ~. ,U 4i r ~° : S p<, ~ ~pp z ;~ 'N~ 3~.5 ~ r11 xi } ~~~ ~ {i ~* `> ]3~~~.'Rr 4~~ ~i ~3 ?k '~ra-`mom .~.>v ~~F <t~s~ µ`f.~e+> ':L'lF~ y3~K, l~ N.4 v yy JR~ t^ Y..,y ~ °C ro ~ q>~~~.~!:C^Jy"rv ,3-d~a~~?~ a t5 r, I1 ~.S! ~' ,5~ti~~~~~~~~! R[3 Q F ~ d.: .' u~ ^._F<}~~t: 4I' "'.i ~ Y]~ ill !SF`s. 1 ~tini> ,iX a ~< . ~e fi fY~„a ~r t~''u;~, Iy,"ti`i~t+.l~~%2,~w"v*^.<s-~,~,`:~F~;t~;'3ry- ~5~~ 1 ~'~\fi t+y4'if ~,.«d~'tr'z'.t.~'S'v s~. ~w ~S~^':e'~`~.3~~;:3u ~~~:~' e t 3`'~ `~ ~. ~> C [=lt ,~ O ~„ .e++G ~:~ 4" ~'`?~ p Irv. "a. a.~ . W pRt: v ~ ~!l i 1 ~~ A~ L {~ F9~e~y`^ I~®JI{~ ly.+/1 ~;a '~. six y r ,~~~ - - - - - ~ p ,,~r.,~, r ~ W d p uj ~ F*,"~~~ ~'KYx~~ ~ 1 ~~.> n" f rq _i~ ; ® ® z i €t- ~ ~~ ~ rofk'- ~ es ~~.u_ :Rai. °;~,~-•^, °~E_y;, ~ ~ i .!~ "`Y, r+,Y't`; llAki ~A~. f,:: `~~s~o -x' 7'2 ~w~~f ~~s(.r~~''^~ tT Tt~~~ ~.~ r ~f l ~'•^i ~~'L e..4``3r~.'S 1. ~Fk s'bs 4is ~~:\ >^ ~~ TY.,.: s. >... a. .l ~l~.i 3F~P.ri <i ixf .~ t: 3' ~ ~3 n fi _ ww d~ ~ W w kc. I ~ z~ ~. - '; i'cy' p~t ~r~vl.'ta f ^K.rc ~ n~^, o~ _ ~t !r! a ~--i0 C~ • ~i ~ ~ !_q ~ ~j~- p~ o - N ~ w ~' tl ro ~ ~ , N ~ ~ V p~l ! 1 ''4 m ~ -' p c~ ~ - !el r , p V ~~ a W .n !! ~ Of ~ ~'~ ~ ,~a t , ~ r 1 It 4e 9~6 ~ ~ lEIB~ ~ d o ~ ~ ~~ w ~ ~I !i '~ ~ e! ~ U ~ r ~ 4 p9[ _______ , ~ ~e ~ ! a 4 p s ~ ~, 83 7A p "' !v ~ is V ~ ~le~' a z Ib ~"'~~ 4 LL /_ L . RESOLUTION NO 06-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2006-00226, TO ALTER THE HISTORIC STOEBE HOUSE TO INCLUDE AN EXTERIOR STAIRCASE FOR FIREACCESSBILITY ONTHE REAR ELEVATION OFTHE EXISTING HOME, LOCATED AT 6710 BERYL STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN C~ZQ2-461f>5. A. Rentals. 1. Mr Jack Hall filed an application for the approval of Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2006-00226, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Landmark Alteration Permit request is referred to as °the application.° 2. On the 26th day of April 2006, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced duly noticed heanng on April 26, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically fords as follows a. The application applies to the property located at 6710 Beryl Street with a street frontage of 245 feet and lot depth of approximately 260 feet and is presently improved with the historic Stoebe House that includes a historic residence, with the addition of a rear access exterior stamvay along the Beryl Street frontage b. The property to the north of the subject site is residential, the properly to the south is residential; the property to the east is developed with a church, and the property to the west is vacant; and c The Stoebe House on the property of the proposed application was designated as a Historic Landmark by the City Counal on August 15, 1984; and d. The application proposes using an office bwldmg, which is described further in the • Conditional Use Permit Application and will include an exterior stairway for access on the rear elevation of the home. ~- is HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-01 LANDMARK ALTERATION DRC2006-00226 -JACK HALL April 26, 2006 Page 2 e The owner has requested approval to make an exterior change to the Stoebe House in contunction with a Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01173 for office use of the historic home. According to Fire Code exiting standards, the conversion from a residence to an office occupancy regwres adding a staircase to the second floor, which meets Fire Department requirements. The owner has submitted plans for the staircase to be added to the exterior west elevation of the home. The owner is proposing wood construction, to match the existing materials Lastly, an ADA ramp must also be installed to the first floor entry door on west elevation. f. The proposed location of the staircase and ADA ramp at the rear of budding is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Rehabilitation which states, in part, that "new additions should be designed and constructed so that the character-defining features of the historic budding are not radically changed, obscured, damaged, or destroyed in the process of rehabilitation New design should always be clearly differentiated so that the addition does not appearto be part of the historic resource "Adding the staircase inside the home would have altered character-defining interior spaces 3 Based upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, and the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 26, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2 24 120 G of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts• FACTS FOR FINDING. Landmark Alteration Findin The action proposed is consistent with the purpose of this ordinance. FacUs. The landmark alteration, as presented, will promote the continued use of the Stoebe House. Findin The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest of value of a historic nature. FacUs• The proposed addition of an exterior stairway, to gam additional access on the rear elevation of the Stoebe House, is compatible and will enhance the continued use of the Stoebe House. 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2 24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mumapal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucaomonga hereby recommends approval on the 26th day of April 2006, of Landmark Designation DRC2006-00226 during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows Planning Department 1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshall's regulations, Uniform Budding Code, or any other City Ordinances. • • • ~~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-01 LANDMARK ALTERATION DRC2006-00226 -JACK HALL April 26, 2006 Page 3 • 2) Any modifications to the conceptually approved design of the stauway by the Design Rewew Committee will be cause for the modifications to be brought back and reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission 3) The design of the stairway should be similar in material and architecture to the existing historic Stoebe house. 4) Approval of Landmark Alteration DRC2006-00226 is granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01173. 5 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2006. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Pam Stewart, Chairman • ATTEST. Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 26th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES• COMMISSIONERS: NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS • ~~N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2006-00226 SUBJECT: LANDMARK ALTERATION APPLICANT: JACK HALL LOCATION: 6710 BERYL STREET -SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 19 STREET AND BERYL STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. B. Completion Date General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its /_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematroe, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Site Development 1 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~~_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 2 Occupancy of the facildies shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~~ State Fve Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~_ other applicable City Ordrnances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance. • SC-1-O5 ~ ~~ Protect No DRC2006-00226 Comoletion Dete APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, ~OR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) Conditions for Building and Safety Department have been deferred to plan check. • Sc-~-o5 2 ~~~ C~ • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ~ AGENDA n CRAMONGA APRIL 26, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call , Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Maaas Fletcher _ McPhail _ Munoz II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 12, 2006 Adjourned Meeting IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They wtll be acted on by the Commission at one Gina without discussion If anyone has concern over any dam, ~f should be removed for discussion A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC - The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for 11 single-family lots on 7 59 acres of land m the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Hillside Road - APN 1061-561-05 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592, Minor Exception DRC2004-00076 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00075 On May 26, 2004, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 26, 2006 C~ ONGA 2 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings m which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related protect Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per md~v~dual for each protect Please sign m after speaking B CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-01096 - VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to construct a 60-foot monopine cellular tower in the Hillside Residential District, located at City Fire Station #175, 11108 Banyan Street - APN 0201-191-28 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirement of the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEZA gwdelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing FaahUes) C CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01173 -JACK HALL - A request to convert an existing historic home mto an office on 1 4 gross acre of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 6710 Beryl Street -APN 0202-461-65 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 Exemption -- In-Fill Development Protect) Related file Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2006-00226 D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION AND AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P - A request for a time extension of a previously approved tentatroe tract map for the development of 21 single-family lots on 15 15 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue The requested amendment involves minor adtustments to street alignments for the purpose of increasing lot depth to 200 feet in compliance with current City standard while maintaining the same number of lots -APN 0225-131-16 Related File Development Review DRC2005-00401 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration VI. NEW BUSINESS E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00401 -TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 21 single-family lots on 15 15 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue -APN 0225- • • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 26, 2006 C~ oNCn 3 131-16 Related Files Preliminary Review DRC2004-00466 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on thts agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 1, Lots J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City o(Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Apnl 20, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga l9'+~ Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers whsle the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http~llwww ci rancho-cucamonga ca us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Cary to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the heanng impaired Vicinity Map Planning Commission April 26, 2006 ~, N ~ Meeting Location• City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive • T H E C I T Y O F I2 A N C U O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE April 26, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY. Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00034-TOLLBROTHERS,INC -The design review of bwlding elevations and detailed Site Plan for 11 single-family lots on 7 59 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Hdiside Road - APN. 1061-561-05 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592, Minor Exception DRC2004-00076 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00075 On May 26, 2004, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 The California Environmental • Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration Is required for subsequent protects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A Project Density 1 45 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Single-Family ResidentialNery Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family ResidentialNery Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family ResidentialNery Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant LandNery Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designatwns Protect Site -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The protect site surrounds the Demens-Tolstoy Ranch House, a local historic landmark The protect site has native grades that average 10 percent, with 50 feet of fall from the north boundary to the south boundary of the subdivision, and presently drams to • the southeast The site is bounded to the north by a recently completed 15-lot subdivision by Toll Brothers, to the south by Hillside Road, on the east by Archibald Avenue, and to the west by future Tolstoy Ranch Road and vacant land The site is surrounded by residential uses to Item A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS April 26, 2006 Page 2 the north, south, and to the east across Archibald Avenue All properties to the north, south, east, and west are zoned Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) ANALYSIS A General On May 26, 2004, the Planrnng Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 and Development Review DRC2003-01139 for asemi-custom house product The original applicant, Elba Inc , has since sold Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 to Toll Brothers who is proposing to develop the subdivsion with their own house product The density of the protect will be 1 45 dwelling units per acre, consistent with the Basic Development Standards of the Development Code The proposed protect consists of four, 2-story floor plans that range in square footage from 4,746 square feet to 5,864 square feet. The product includes two plans (Santa Barbara and Carlsbad) that were recently constructed by Toll Brothers, Inc on Tract 16262, lust north of the protect site and two new plans (Del Mar and Trabuco) Architectural styles include Manor, Tuscan, Mission, Spanish Colornal, and Craftsmen The protect site is located within the Hillside Overlay District, which requires architectural design techniques that minimize the amount of grading and allow the house to follow the natural grades The protect has been designed so that all floor plans have stepped pads with an overall elevation change of 2-1/2 feet or greater, thus meeting the design goals of the Htllside Overlay Distrct All horse corrals meet the 70-foot radws requirement from all adtacent dwelling units The Community • Trail on Hillside Road from Tolstoy Ranch Road east to Archibald Avenue and along Archibald Avenue north from Hillside Road to the north boundary of the subdivision will be regwred to be installed with the proposed protect The perimeter fencing plan proposed by Toll Brothers, Inc (tapered river rock pilasters and split-face block) is identical to the previously approved plan by Elba Inc Staff is pleased with the architectural treatment to the elevations on all plans, the variation utilized m the roof planes, and the strong use of materials that have been selected to create a casually attractive product B Minor Exception DRC2004-00076 The protect includes a previously approved entitlement for Minor Exception DRC2004-00076 that was approved by the City Planner when the subdivision was being reviewed The Minor Exception will allow up to 8 foot high combination retaining/freestanding walls for grade differential purposes for Lots 1-8 and 11 Since Toll Brothers proposed Grading Plan is simtlar to the previously approved Development Review DRC2003-01139, Toll Brothers will need combination retaining/freestanding walls up to 8 feet in height The standard height limit for walls in residential distracts is 6 feet All retaining walls will are within the maximum allowable 4-foot height limit C Design Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Mc Phad, Stewart, and Coleman) on February 28, 2006 The Committee recommended approval, however, the Committee admonished the applicant that the next protect submitted by Toll Brothers must include aone-story plan with articulation to all sides consistent with the current City Council direction • -~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS April 26, 2006 Page 3 D Grading Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Grading Committee on February 28, 2006 The Committee approved the protect, subtect to the following conditions 1) The private trail between Lots 1 and 2 shall provide a concrete gutter with water bars spaced accordingly, and 2) Rear yards with downhill slopes and stair access shall have hand rails on either side The Committee's conditions have been included in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval. E Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on February 28, 2006 The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval F Environmental Assessment The proposed Development Review is for the design review of bwlding elevations and detailed Site Plan for previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted on May 26, 2004, forthe 11-lot subdivision (SUBTT16592) The protect will be regwred to implement all mitigation measures adopted in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, thereby ensuring that any potential impacts of the protect will remain less-than-significant Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on May 26, 2004, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 Pursuant to CEQA Gudelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in • connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same protect unless t s (i) substantial changes are proposed to the protect that indicate new or more severe impac on the environment, (u) substantial changes have occurred in the arcumstances under which the protect was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts, or (ui) new important information shows the protect will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered, or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts Staff has evaluated Development Review DRC2005-00034 and concludes that substantial changes to the protect or the circumstances surrounding the protect have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration that was adopted for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 and Development Review DRC2003-01139 The applicant is proposing house product on previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 The site, grading, landscape, and architectural design of the proposed protect are in substantial compliance with the previously approved Development Review (DRC2003-01139) for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 Staff further finds that the protect will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not regwred to reduce the impacts of the protect to a level of less-than-significant The proposed Development Review of 11 houses on previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 will not cause one or more significant effects on the environment or need additional mitigation measures since the proposed protect has been designed to be consistent with the previous protect site grading, street configuration, drainage, and house plotting locations Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning • Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Development Review DRC2005-00034 ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS April 26, 2006 Page 4 Staff is of the opinion that no further environmental review is necessary because (1) All potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately under the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted on May 26, 2004, for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592, and (2) The proposed Development Review will not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration No new environmental information has been presented that would raise or create new or adverse impacts not already considered in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental rewew or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant held one neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed protect on February 8, 2006, that was attended by one resident The resident lives in the subdivision immediately north of the protect that was recently completed by Toll Brothers In summary, the resident had general questions about the architecture of the houses and subdivision layout The resident indicated support for the protect RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2005-00034 tt~rdUgh the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Ily Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC DG/ge Attachments Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Draft Res - Site Plan - Conceptual Grading Plan - Conceptual Landscape Pian - Floor Plans - Building Elevations and Roof Plans - Building Envelope Sections - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated February 28, 2006 - Initial Study olution of Approval for Development Review DRC2005-00034 • • "Y ~~ d as y':SsS} ~~y6 a '' g ~ '_ ~~d~m < YQ g ~` ~~- ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ u_.r ~ m,oa 4. .., .~ i? e ' 1 mi c a 7 ~' 1~ '~ z>q5 ,-.i Ili i~-_ti zo i~_ '~ ~- 1" a-=4 -'e _ =- 6 a ,`; "" Y yirf _~ _'€Ew e'i; is ~ _ `~~~v~;7 i ~_~'~a~~~~ i ~ ~ ~ I F ~ ~ "~~s-^ , ,Y719 ~~ i~ ~i ~......_ 5 ~F~ r .~I ~_~ ~ J r` ^'.,°~,t~n~d5 l i;Fj~l, ;~"S'~wt„t~}'~^ '~ a~,k~`~~~~w~• ;.'F ~,'~~~~ ~ ,~ ,t~'~F ! ~ l~l) f ~ ~ S/ IY. 111~i ~~I .~{ ~~(i ' JI_~~Cii ~/ ~ 1, X11_ Lp'~`Y~ x~w~~ i~ I k~f" i 1~ 4,. 3•-x-I k:Ii,~, J-- ~ ~ yy A 1 ~~7 ~ ! ; n r~ o.., i' ¢{ . U li~~{k ~',~ {Y~ 4, -Yi,f a{~ I p I '~11 ?i•~yu ~~11 ~*:' Sy ~ A'~~ i - ~~ I'1 i -l~L Ifl;itr~ ~~' _~'~:r,; !j, s`1 ~,,, -/1 rplY ~~ ~ i tr'~~• ~''~Y r ( ly ~p ;-;, k~z~lnl ~~t r~r; ;x'~~y '~ 1{~•/~~l~l~~~lair.~dal `,LJ ~I~'~~ ~/~ ..M-.-7i ~~~' ~ ~ ~ ~ r~lr LS /,11 ~I ~'~Y ~l ~'J~l y)i --''9~"~~i ~~' ~~ i' ~V`I~~ I `I ~t~ ,,-. t_ {rh j„~ ~.,~~ ~?I F I \~,yL, ~ I f'( '"i~ I II"yd '-y' J~"~ t'l y}i ~ ~I~~i, Ii`' •- {',' i.f.~.- . T , a- ~ x -~ ,=~I-i -- - - - ~ r a y y.~ 1 \I° y - S-'~ i '1 ~' rrs ~4K'~ ;r!~ti, id '' "1',I z,1 I'•~~~' rl r` ~..1~; ' I ~ ,~ _,•~ _ ~ IFh,I',_ v ,'-~~ ~ IIL ~.• ~~ 1-L\ ~'a.~ •,.~1 ~;~~ I ~ fly~~~~ I I C ~ VV *ylGj} .H I i I~, C-W 1~Y/ y 'llf 'Fr _= ~~ii _, v'{',. 7, 1 k~l'~ z'~i ~~I ~ I~~ 1.1,~k,Y (} +~ II ^~ 4 ty, 1, ~' I ; , , S 11 i } ~ I ~ I I ~c c l~ (f ;`.tYJ ZW= I~i~I ~~~,~-_-~ f „~~Irl^Ey I 'd,~;~l,IIL~O~''~ ~I/t~egk`~i~~,L•, N l g i ~~ V, _ _ d ~ ~ w .'e I , ~ / ' yl ~I ~ '~ ~ ~~ ter' Q ~ 4 '9 I 't ~' ! >?Rpa 1 I r (, V~' I I/ ~ I q i I ' O ' n~~l ~ t l ~_~~ * it ili -~ f ~ I l ~\ l~> Q ~ (O , '~~I `til bb Ilnl 6 ~ ~I,_i~ ~~ , I~ •i~v < v m O i ~.' I m ~ la ~ ~ w ~' ..~ ~r 1 4.0~ ~ \~ N ~ ~;_~y; ~ ',~T ~ I° f~„ ~, , ~~~ -~-. - ,rte ~~;~ W ~ 6Y1'-j-_1 {}~ ~l ~ r ~ w~ ~.~~ 7 ' - ,'~~;n 'r~' k 71 ~ , . V v .~ W ~ F- 1L_-..~I o~ I_ '~ ill _~ ~ ~I f~\ I ~ ' I:~ I a 1 ~' , _ , ~i{ev' ,~ h~' __~ +~ I 1 j ~i I , ~' '~ 1 1 I I III t} ~ c<~ 3`' Iry' \ r `~ ' ~ `1 ~ ~ I 1 1 r ~~it -+.e. l~~ll}'~+,, rf D-SyJ ~I~ ^I~11~t~ I t'~~/'''I II ''~(~I 1 I .-.~f~,,d !l' -+-'f~e-t,h~.l R a j 1 1 ~ ~ - k a I 1 i I f i i of \ I' I i ~.V "- .,`L~ Ems,.-- +~j~~'±~i~x~ q~, ¢'~, i~ NFO'ill~~li~~~'r' '/~'~~\,'\1~l I-i'`4 `~' 'i 1111 i ' 1 \ ~[j` ~I / ,11.w~ '~ F, ' r 11' ', jl , ~~ 1 i. , I ~ I ~.~1~/ f i l ~? ~~ , g~ ~'~ I I 1 1 1~~ ~ I ~i~ 'lit ~~ii it/; 1 ;/r~~L;a'~~cY'~y~L~y ~ ~ ~;I ~ ~ i I iil~••I ~ I•~ ; °i s ~.~ y` Z2~„{ c ~~~~i ~'~ F.~:..\ i(c I 5 r'id' ~ ~ I I I l'~ '~ i_ ~ ~' 1 !~'>\~;~ ~9 '~ -jrL/r~~ , y /:'j ~~„~ H" ry~~l lt' i~t(~~ I ~ ~~1] I ' 1 \~ ~ ~ ~;.~ ., ••~ t'~t_ v~ ~' II ~I 4 { ry~li , ~^~-,~i ~'li ~-r~ • ~ I fI i-~J ~ •~ .~ i ~', 1 " ~'^'.'\' • li l) t 4 c~I IpI i...,u,J I \ Lrf,l~lij -~ T I 1 i I ia~ ~I.I / /~M11 k Y ~ 411 ~• I ' ~ ~~ r L~`~~~ ~ ~ [• ~ '~` I l ; ... «`..^"... I ~ v 9 ~ 777 v 1 .,I ` rt ~~ .~~r; ~ l'R ~I. I a~~ p w `~~YIP 't 1 t ~ ', 1~ v ., .._:~i ~r--. ~~ wu i 1 ]~' T` i-.f, "^T'~-r Zso p %'~'ir ~l -.~5 ill l,~ A~ '`L~ i.~n~t\~6~1 ,@i_ `Lr~>~•t"~ ~ ~~~ 1,- m x ~~ 1 v ' i I ~~ g DET_AI_L_ED_ _S_ITE_ PLAN THE ENCLAVE II BY TOLL BROTHERS TR NO 16592 - ~, • I , -- I ) i~ ~ ' ~' • PROPOSED R~S~IDENXFAL ~ ~ ra , - _, `;' I ~ I ~ I ; _ -- • ~ PER QTR 16262 ' ~ ,,;~ ~ . -~3 i< _ n_ r_ c;i A o' rll 6 1 a e~ I ~~ ~I ~ "(~, - _~"~'.3'T„ 1. !_ .J 598! . !/'/Yp !~~, ~_~ ^ I' , ---~,- _ I ~y,-. .. ,,, __ __~,.___ _ _r_- - r _- 1 ~ T 1 _ -__ ~_i 1 rl ~ - - ~~- i z . ~s " ~ r,r ~ e I4 ` ~ • y I ~ r ( p ~ I ~~ ~ - Irl~ lr •_ \ _ ~ ~~ F L I o I t ~ , J ~ c~ ~ ii _- / _ - ~ - I v ti_~, ;- _-_ -- ' r . - }~.~y_lFTl"'~~yl t ~Ji ~ sFd' I~e~tf _ _ ~ ~ „ . ~ ~lws.~ ~ ~~~ r~ ~ ~~ ~ r ~ ' N6NG NY . s ^~7~&r ...IJ VICINITY MAP Nor Io s~mE ~ ~ ~ ~• ., _ . . . x _ -( Q r1 ' ' LEGEN6 - _ ~ •~ ~ , < ~ ... _ ~ - ~ ,.. _ r EASING 'I, DE.F19 - TGISTOY _ _ - .- _ ~ r '~ E6RGRGAL Pg1.E = _ - _ ~ BCAI.E~ fb w. »., • . r.. n,rr. ~ ~~ ~ • - I ~ I ~'r l ___ .n ~.. rv. .r. r o-v i rv. ... ~ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ _ .~~ ti ~ _ ~ IL ~ -R ~ _ ` _ - -~_a_ -- ---,_ _ _ -- _- _- ____ _ - - -~ -- - TR NO 16592 ~ ; _ _ ~_.r 1 . - - ' _ - - - ~ PREPARED 9Y _ =_ _ `-"' ___ s ~ _- - : O ~ ~ ir _ ~, - HUNSA KER 6 ASSOC UTES °"wn ' r ~ )r , it ~ ~ o.. ..emmm m PRFPARED /OR • ToB Brothers, Inc u re ns mw...o eoonra. ro.o svne soo ox.xcr r. szeee (li.) 9J]-O)CO f.f ()r.) 9]s-9)11 ~ maur~wranm ao i Z6S9l aJ 1JVH13NLtlll&L Q.ry Or90WD ltlflld3:1N~~ c 5 gr~~' s ~ a f ~~ snirvw xna i~3ona vwuiw bx+.rxa 5 4 8 e d p % , Y ~ js v~ 9 ` -~ F E 4 i rsf 4 Y ~o ~ $~ ~~/- ~- E E~ Li L t d ~~ ` ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 5~~~~Q ~i 111111 I sQ~~~~~ ~ ~6~ ~~ z r ~ a ~ c o °6+ "~ ~!Y ~ w ~ V V bj °z ~~~p F~ 3$ sa b e"~ U ~Y d z ~ 84 , °<F;~, a ~~ ~~ ~ ~m~ ~' ~ ~ S W a > ~ p O t ~ ~'r . ~ g W ` _ ~ U F y F b } >~ oz o~. U [i] V .~ ~ F tl 1 ~~ ~ ~ I ~_ i ~ - ~ r C- Pr i ~§~ 1 i J ! !, ~= Ii ,,.. o,,,,a,.~m rav-la 3ovNwa Z6S91'M1 l.~tlkLL 3NiV1N31 QN 047OV4A ltl(U snrrvw rme u~ urruwo eevew I r e ~ tl :4~~r~1 i 4 YLJ4 a q E e ~ ~~ _~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~4 . ~~F 61 ~~ S ~ s ~ ~ s- - 3 ~~ fit: i ~q~~ ~ F b ' L - r ~14 p L ~ j ~ - g ~ ! 84 ~ ~ '~ ~~~~ ~` i`d~ :~: ~ 4 ~ i S-_ 1 ~ L I n , Sg O MH ~ ~~~ Z Q1 i L , i ! dC0 i i' q4 ~ ` ~ F ~ e ~ +u e~ ! u Y _ L a cr S i ~ ~ p i o ~ ~ z ~ ~ S s--r u ~ g I i ~U :~ W a ~' BBB ~ ~ { ~ 3 ei ¢E-. o~7°~e ~~. ~ ~~ y I rm y ^a ~ (s; C fe ,. \ ~ ~ I I ~ x 4, _ ~ f I p "E"" 1`0 4i uF ~~e$ ~ ! 1 \e. I ~4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ /~ l ~ ~ I •, ~ n4 ' ~ E"' tl ~ ~~ 1 ' ~; AI 1 ~ , i F s \ !i ' a ' a '! s ~ i~ ~ ' 6~ f i 4 6 8 > I v \ { y ` `i ~ ~ p 4 e l d4 I P I ~ I e ~ ~ ~ i o ~ - ~ ! S i ® 1 Y ~ 9 I 99 y s A~ rj7 ~ ~ i r f x 4 ~ me ~ '~ ~ e ~ - ~7(13~z6zT I e C-\ I • • i 1~ d~!!'ke 1~"fl.i ~. F! 1 Yt. - ~_e ~~ ma J O ~ a ~ O b Q mU~ rWif U ly 2y W ~~IP~I Ijl~l~~ tSIE~GGS`f{ `1` ° ``-4~rbt! F le[l`[sPpplIilie! dele : I a~'~;~YQ E~ I Gd it vu ~~ k~~° ~. ! I d-friF[xl =~ 1 G F- ; I f .alidP m ! 6 ~ f ~i~sl P:e~Fer F3 I ~ 3 i il;:v!'v" E :5J ~I y'6 ~ 1512~ .e. evs: ., sFvielfr e = ~., P°~ Ia~i PE6a€, Nlfp ` { ? € ° 1_yt ep!` { r ` fjtlGe~ iFS o~~ 1 i o 2.41vrsv;[ k - E p~ p s . >; ri{ t~~: E.: [! g!g ~' S~lsie iii', s ~~ [, k:i~P~°~ S'6 ~ ~S! 9 ` E ~~j'. 5 ~'!~~€~;€€1ldEbH ~7 ;i[;I,E. I~ps; ~r F`°~fF! F _ ``'f9 l`~J_l'-1'-[S.,t'-°d~- d~ <e6Bs: G ~ SIJlf1 ;s ~ ~aP'i"c 4eF {Zi tl43 ~:5 ~ Y3 ~'(l~a~t ~ - ,~ ~ !+~ x a= ~ ~ t r;1~~i ~+$ e d CE- ~ $ $gld1E!a 1 1 5~• cil~ 2. dfirt3li{{ ~ ° 'o l 1;tpp `' r'bEGa'~a' Ir r ~ E~P! n f~il~~~ y_a .'13G~ iE4 lee l7 ba P ilSddR~~g12 S2 ~[_~?~~~ '!~ 1 Fjh~~~~ o Ala 7.Sdi19 il; -i laG,t! _[: ~I:, ~ ~Er„~3E~~+°`'6 ggXSn~i ~I Y,. f`@ a G. i L`FF t iso!!!Sl i. I . ~ a.a~6~3~ e s.,v ~~ EECir`~~Els!G tt d• ~egp~~ I1r1 '~I~~s~Av, iiSySy ?En{.' :~~ --. .GZ.i. ". ~7®?rsfi'P lei :~ BP~i{~-e YYe~f~$s~$iF ~l3 ~` rat"li I ~ jfkJ/]AY OlY INJtlY I - ~ I .~~, .~ W . ~ „ ,I _ ( ~ ~ a Q _ " s I S }' i ~'r\~'..~ J O ~A. ~ E L r' sao i ~i0 ~ ZII ~ W ~ ~ n O il ifi O ~ I - ~: I ~ w~ ~ W / \ ~ I \ Ilt ` ~ ti _ ~ ~ II r gg 1 II 1 IL' CI n ~t' ' 4 P FG ~ I~ = ` F " a° r e y s yE ~ '6 Y f ; ~( b . itlr 1~ ° i e ~ } s ~ k i S § ~ ~ ~ gy ~ a g ~ ~ ~¢ !P p. P n Gy ~ ; :~ ~ e a ~ r 3 ~ 9 gG ~ar ~e u6 ~ } P ~b ~ ~ Y~ i, ~ a r° 'e ' F 'x' r f d s qxq ~ ~ 5 4 i S K 1' p 1 LS a 3 [[ } ~ E ~ b ' Y ~ { F P s ~ y ? ~ S ~ s k ~ ? ° s~ : ~ a x~ Ehl I [ ~ '~ ~ aF 7 ` 4 f% is° [R v s Y ~ .p , § ° y t : L ii }fe r~ f' i 4G ; ~~ ; i n _ ,r 1 b~ x k e a s° P 5 }[rG 33 }? j T E{ ° r F j Eb g i r° r~ ~ :~ s g; ; t, v ~Y ex a P[Y = e' _ ;sa g f = _ ° , „° p e= Y ~ P tt Yr E E !i°i33 [[15 ..3 ° ~ I Yii ~ r [ fe +F.t a ~. 13 ~ PSd (2 sr # S IE PG~ ~ e c~ a ~! r ) _ S &r ~ ' i I ~ i G:zr s F~ ai S~ §iY ~`"~ ~~ r x .P g~` F P gl s ?' ' _ ~P c^ ~ dF ~ ~ 7 Er-' F A=' ~5 ] Err ES !? E x ~S Fr~ t i 5p P "e, r ~~ ' ~ [; pi ; - Gy e `- a YP ._ .~n ~FY 'd ~ ? y Y=. e P ~ e ~ " a,a s° ±Fz . ~ - 4 e g~s ! '3 ~_ a L(1 r~8 ppo i Y IS ~~ f r !} S EF 3~ .°s ~" sg ~ r S' g re { a ie°°c } Se 9e ~ ~*F FYL d{ P `L e' k: ng G° :t §, a~r y? se 9 [ s: o- ?x Y i `OS~t x` i`=, ]F S yEp ~)z f~ S t S`~Yy~i r F {${p Y. P` a ,E iix ~k `~ ~ ~ 2~ P aj P S 6 i, $ [ eL [ ~ F~ °~ [r ~~ ~ o f: iC r Pr Y lI k e; c; lee e - S@ge `r! ,Y g? ~~ rx: 6 ~ g! E: z= s` s"3 : g oe ;o P sr ~ a° i .C g=rrF F ~i Ei y $t` ~[c iP dF ~ Pk °?[ z; ., e °"s S g_ n~e _ q't : ~ e2 YI E e: ~PS"gYi 3 `'~e St t *yyE ~}F ~t i? 2 Fe FryyY'' S L = L[P ~s ~a E s; ;:S yi xa s s 9e ~Y ° .°L ~ eE d ° ES6 p[e ~ ° EY +F27 t ~? P.Y f "c6 a _. 5 Pa ~ bg d aS`1 ~' r F P rEP ' +! E ^° ~$ fO °r F 35 ~ ~ F~ ; ~ScL s¢ ~~ ~y`k e.`.i [ 3P Y }F [ aY ~_ .v^9] F ~GF 4ra ' PP? lYV YP Z` ~ ee r~ P ~ 4€ Y1 i Ser a 1[ } e ;.' 2f raJ @ ;`Y S~ `e5 y Pr's ' ' € r~ t! $` E r [ s a„ -. » [ :E - C a s..F f[ { ' ~ [ Er .: ' feF g[i y> EI .4 e[ s5~L ## x!' 2 Y(. [: "t = '- e d - , _ ° ( ei GE r: 4° : L { fe -' 3 •_ ` F' _ °e EF 1 > ,.. ea ~Ta4„ti 1 4~r` ![ °_ iyl tfF E•¢ a `L .°r prp[ _„ e; Y Y:P 'e i~ a °z 'r[ ; -. v' ..y 7. [d z° rl Y£ } jPY }eY ¢P 1°. ~.! F!~ %b !! iY .a~~ f P: "; 1 ~g :; € ~= ;+; ` ja ; 3 E;e ( g: F` Y [~ z [ sEF$v yy[ ~f .°c3;, GL_ si# F YY' `e~ s i e ° :.: ?. 'v.:L ce xr [_; :~ y~ P- }(~ '( x9~ !. YEPP bi ~'ve d4- ~1 G>3 `r1 ~[s i{ LC e~ iaEi a GZ fF 3 ~!r E. ~ 4. - e ' YP ~ d' ~ €' e ;t : r3 ? r:y 4" ce" 7 /e' i Y .6[x`x = :i ~,_ P 2 °s _ ___ - `° S 2 `-°t P a: ~a WI f• E°~[ ~- i iC~ a r1.: e`j f ° IY ~A YZ YPa/. y 4L ` _" .T i o '- - Y4 f Y= Zf3 ~C k v EY _eF ~ s ~f °s a~Si ' ai P: - m .°°' - -` - -~=5 _- °€ ~° °:.. a -. _x >, P= c5 e ~~ r! GCE 3p' le~? l ~~E Ca;= Y~•~ s~ia mydq -! , F? - e 4! t re ZEP < : op g z t. n {e~ o } r : !Yv i, g ~ N P '~I1. t .~ ,.~ ~ipl~ ~F s`+~; ;dj"'•s~~y~o1e n~i 11:.1611. ; ."e ..~' 8 ,.,.d n 11Y130 01100 nnOJ pNY lOONY]l0 NIYnO Y]tlY (~ .r~.~ s~--~ w. r uo n o~..~ u va¢ lnup ullno ebro aNr moNrna NndLL r]Nr ~.,.._,rv s~~ xKrc« m ilo K-.veu ur13a 131ua Nnno r3nr o~ a3uno 3ooa nn+r~ m~ - - n ~vi3a aaa. aad of wrno 91iD1~N00 NOK N)Ipl lY - n ma nw " v Slx nrwrxo awuun N o pK n u I s r wu~a nnn 6 - d = 1 DYMYM Y W K 1YJ44 l 3Gm `y ~ l m - .°` i w wi • a.W~ Iry su 51013d015 NMOO NO NLW03S AYM3AW0 1Y0MA1 --__ m-4 _. ~~.`.~- 4a -~ is ~Ig `J NOK XIIJI IY Nua o~wAms maul ~` I'/ -il ~... e..~, `~T/moo O ..e...., `] ~ ~ SlNL30 1Mtl1 b03 6 113H5 335 310N 9N009S 10] IMOVuVNI b03 SL33H9 335 310N 11YM ONINIY13n 9 N0I10-A NMOHS N011035 3d0]S NMOO dAl N0110 /., JN00 yf 301M ,9f dAl +-.. ---~ ~ , ~~ ,...a. ~,~..~..., ~..,,~ ~"M" SNWJJNNOJ 3pYNrvUp pxY M'I3p 1lYM +.~~~u ~~~ mu.. ow~rr ~INlp 3pW. ll ~ leYd']J 1YbYJ35 Y]lAVll StlNLLp AB pL]bSNI ]B 01 S1NM OMINIYllL A1M NW V11lq]N d01 NNW5 ]LY SlM iMplJp OhY yNIN1YVN~~ LW 11 ~xox. aunrllµM N.x r.:~l pl .. .s' rvn/ rv. ~~1rv310N ss s3dols nvNlYxa 9 3rns du ~ ~~°'" "~ ul. 1 YY130YY130 NM1 .~ ~ u~w~ l r.a.u` ~.... w.~ ~~~ x~ .~.. a se uJxls xvenre JNnoJn ll-e • - pN lol ~o- LT M ^ O TON3031 ONY 93ION NYid ONInWllld n 1`1 V (= 5101 ]d015 dl1 NO NW019 AYM3A00 IYJIdAI ~~ I v III-I..°n n~ ~C N a.. n. .s mn~ /~ WI 4LR'E G-IE ~'4i RPM 3R41L VMTL PLREEG4iE ~~p-r~ PECESiRIGY GLiE .m .o ~w, ~~a.+~ ~~ .~ ~~~ rr.r mn.~. mn~ ~.. ~..~ aRli [KE oICCX FIEyS`EF 3 4 'L3 4 'L Vw LII~K~CC2 "JdLt ~tt~~~)))j~jj~lll--- .~.. 1 ~WTnn~wnm aEE L-YCX14_4..N KR!CNSiR1C ~PV m°m« <~ I } ~ j /e[ [uric ~ ~ ~ ~R [ar ._wrc. F -~7 I~ ~z \ ~` SCCTION ~ ~ t '!~fl ~~ `eel „ `A H~ 13 I .: ,,.w II ~~a',~, ~ P!~ f iYP iRAit PUN vl[W _ rin. ,5 ! , r LC~IlCIC~ ~ : .T 7 f°~° °w:~ ~ i n. :.,,, aaa :. TYP TRAIL SECTION PPEt6E GRADING PIAI _ "eaoanres 7R NO 1659' :CR BTo~IV Brothere, fn~c ®---~ ~- ,~~.n.m,...a.~~..~, zt-' .... i v7 , ~ ~~, %"i'~ ti __ _ Z l - ,~ k v i I ~~ ~----- - -~_, ~ .w a o ~_CT E, - r ~~--~ - ~ er 3a~ N~ ~.~ ~ ~ I ` -" / W 'bt9i~1 _ ~ C ~- -ASS ~ a ~ ~ ' t . . _ ~ N ~Pi $;j S4 .d el.~~C +.. e4 ~'lis~pp ~ 9 1 , t i .c'i~~+~ ~~~yy~7+~, '° ~~ m t~..~. ~ , 1 ~ ' .b. .~'~lj'^ '? Ian tNVt1~~ ~xtizt~~ c' C~ ---r--__ 41 } ,'- ~ ~ Jt I I -~ ~` a~ 3umi ~I i1 ~~ %'i _~ .. =o : ~ .~ °~ 't. .tt I li -._ . i j i i i ~~ g G3~ 1'~ I ~~~ ,-'- ~I ~Y ti~lp ~ ~ ~I ~ ~~ ~~ ~` Fe _ F w ~~ ~ ~' p O i 1 N JI ~~~ I)F~ ~ ;' ~.A, I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-...~. - ~ ;, _ `~ i ~ I I ~ - ~P:a ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~ n _ ~ -~- \ ' ba/l L y °- Lr J l ,_ -1 ~ Iv _r ~ 7 I ~ ~i _4 ' _ I ~ _ ~, _ _ ~ j I i ,r 11 e _ _ ~ L ~ S~i tkerEE ~ I_ ~- M1 d ~ E3~t~ @@e I ~ ~~" ~~~ - ~ ~ ,.~ j ~F~ xe @rtt a: c I ' _ O 'i ^ ~ .3ttg fer ii bgg ~4_ ' e oe~~lfa ~ik1 o ~ _ r ~ e~ - j . . ~^t i;f o3?ep2i Eet~ - I~ 'i ~ 31'_~t~a'_u~~~~5 . ~~ - ~ r ;.~r ' ~ ~ r ~ ri .x i ~~ III: ~ `~- .~' ~le ;+~~ / ~ I ~ i1,t. fS I I lNiu ;, ~ ~~ f ~Htl~ p ~ ~ 3 J ~°: 1 ( I / \ : ~ ..-,. .=L - . r ~ I r , - c - x 9 a __~ e ~ {{~~ ~a~~= \ Z ~ SN,. 1J/ .. ~ t;}. NI .~\V ;.' ; i~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~~~ I U ~ ~ i i , y ~` ~~~ I ~ ~t~< f ~f3 r~ H, v ~ I`~i1 i ~~~~ ~.y3 l vt,- ~ d .~ a 9y ; ~ ~ ~ ,~- ~ s ~!~. a ~"~~ ~~ ~ ~\ ~ ~ Sa ~_A~ / t,~ / .roe. w ~~ ~ "s-'~I ~ __ _ - -_ ~-S__`_ ~ _ ; - -rA. z~SSi xvvvno_ / 5 +t ~ ~ _ , +`r ' g s~ 1 - Y r j 1 .+ i i ~. 3 ~ j I ' ~~~T } C~0 ~+ i 5 9~ 3° ~` fF S - 1 3 3 fl s /` ~!~ .I., ~i~ 1=_. 1 I ~ ~¢•° --~~'w.~'1~-- a ~:~; -' Um ~ $E'$ x tl- i [ m`Ys. ~.y} -d ~ ! F^.' 3 3 S ®i 1~ti U a ~ 16 ~°~ -a -.. ti ., _ _~ . 1 1~ A I ~xi "Iy5 y v , .~ v8 I ~, .. _ ~ ~ ~ Ji ~ / ~ a ~ h ~ ~ ~~ " ~ ~ J?:x I ~ ' -mow e M ~ I ~ e ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ` t \ A f I) iG a'T I T' W _ r=~ a . ~.- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I A n ~ - _ _ e I ~g / ' a 3 i u • a I ~^ nrn f ~ ra .~ 45 I I , ~ # , L ~ - i `451 I . ~ ~ 1 \ ~ }2 ~i 2 I ~.. ~ _ ~ ` ..~~}}~~ _~ ~_ _ I ~ ~ .. -ter _ _ _._ - ~rr_ N. _ -tea _ T~ ° q 6 '~- ~. _ - P'k i i s a, d Z Yt~'3 : -'r -' ~~-T,a1~> sT-~ 2 >:i~5 [l Q d 0 ty ) ) I ' 3 S _ _ ` _ _ _ = --- - O!~ x --- kt 3 b ~ H 1t -_ -fit O 1 S 7 0 1 ~ qE r y q .. t: ~ l~ HJLp I e?M 111 / ~~~~ F i rV~~-~ 31A13 HJl/0 pp ti .A I ~ ' ~'I --i l it ; @I 3•. gS !f k ~~ ~; ' e; ! ~~ ~1 e~ . 6 I ; h; %!~ ~. t if~f; ~~~ ~ E tilli~~~ ;l F ., a ~ _ R ~'~~ ~, c S ~ i_ ;~: = Ec4 =F. „6rE Sly6 ?•e= ° •~: °z3p~:F76~4 ~IzS oat i°s'~ ,s,q ~9A~~~~f"€eESk d °v~~,i~Ji~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ r't~{ h ~ ~ 1 Y/ ! 1. '- 3, ,y ,O, _ "", ,I Jg~~, -- - + II (1 `_li E°~S `~ _ ~, =,: o_ ~: . € v~i ~:~~ 5-5t r ~€~~ A ~`- i ~ miPse~ J'i. \~-~5 f5 -i ~ • r 1 ~~ ~' ~ IC I I ~ - nr 70 ,•,~ ~.° v i ~ f ~ - ° 2i.h5 47n .- 1x"31 °~ ~ ~ ~ 'i N ^~~ I ~ _ S ~ _ of I c - iu a - - -~--,; a -~~ _- - ~ ~ ~, • '> 1 I~~Q r~~n-~~~ Il~,~y ~ I, ;~ -_ a5 "r ~.N I 4 _ rl a -F" _ a•2 p~ - ~ ~g~ -i,{E ;~-I, i a ~~~ ° 6- •: °~.s i~ :'!~`. ~y ,~~ i , ~, j I I ; _~IL g _ ~ 41 +3 <,. ~ ;~ i III ~' ~ry J~)~/ £ .+,/ gtr ~~~ ~i ~ °• ~~T\ ~ .. I(~ O T -_ ~-4`~ 1 ~I- _ . . ~x~~}°' ~_ +~ ~ 'I I'~III '~ ,~ ~ @ t (y~ \~ fear' .a` 'x~ ~`:^'fss i B ~ -~ ~ ~ q~5-~eM. ~.~~`S~ - 1',~~I I ~ ;~~ ¢ i6o-ft I p: ~ ~f}~ -~~ vn Yk rb, ~ 1- ~ l/~ U Zd I _ .." ~ _ ~' i__ t~~~~.'~~ 'I,~ III 'CI ~ ~ °ti ~ c•;-..:=-8 - 4iP~<v., ~~W~C ' `, J• I~b ''III; i ~: -Sx. _ I~ 3•J,~,wi':-- gUIF _ 1 r? , f ~~~. ~ -~~--~~- ~ +,~j~;'.~I_,,; Iii ~' ~°° 1 ~ Yi. 1 .; +~' ~ : "'- ~ 5 ~ ~ ~-_ _ y ,~t 111 FI } ~ u \ / \ \Sd _ - ~ ~ _ `~ ^ W --v._-------'1y~ ~~ - _ _ b i~ ~ - I ~ ~ _ '. r:r.-r°~ ~ I~I•!7,t el. ,~~~r<s.., ' 1~~ ''~- ~~~~',P~\}lam y:~f s~-~:~ . -,=~ _' ~_ ~ ~~1 ~'` ~ N ~Y~~-~- ~ ~4 4- 1 3 3 H S 3' 3 S ° I -=--=~ ~~ sN i~ 1111 q j a N _. - _~.~ ~~. ~---_ __ - =--~ -_ ° a~ - - -h-- ,- ~-- -- ~~ ~ ~ ,` - ~- ~ 3 n d ~~ Q ~ N H~l~~•~,~_~. ~ --- _y_ ~~.-_-- -_ _ ~ .. ~ s, I ' - j l,~r %'' ' 1 t_ _ ~ ~ rya a: ~ ~~~ ~~" ~~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~ a t . i,,. _ tom, . _I ~ .i x y ~ ~.~f i t ` ~ i I d_ ~ o f ~~~___-_~-__--~_~~~~~~--_ I E f i I~ r~` r y ~~ I c 's a'S t~~ "~ I' i i I I r .i '~'"~ d"~ g ~ _ ~ I - `~ ~ ,~ ad~~ g ~~e ~ s I rl ~~h ~ e ~; _~. I~ ,_ s 5 gF ~ Q ~~ r `- '~` aI, r'r~ I i ~~' i t ~ 4 e e _- ~~i ~_~~ "I I I V'' ~I~I'i oo t ~ ~~~ U i I _ 'I fi,1 ;~ <,r~'I,J ~ ~ Q ,~Y~~ ~~ ~ m ,_~~ ~ ~~ I I ~I ~, I , _~ a {~- ' ~ ~ i' If i ~~ _ rn o j ~ t ~~~ ~ I I~ ~ Ty2_~ -i L.~ O Lp ~ ~~ip. YI ~~ - i~ I' '~ i I ~. ~u ~ ill ° I ~ ~"° ~ ~^~~~, Yirt' ~r.-'V~.,~ ~ _ I ~I k IY ~f i ~' ] r r ~' ~' ~ \ ~ _ e E -~ - ~rl aY ', .. I /IQ'J- HV i- _~' ~ \' ,'I II i ' b I t, i~~ _ i'=+ '`-;~_ ~ 'i, ), ~A__ % , r~o'~~s Iii l';~{F ~fe -i .. i ' ~~ .`~~ ~; ~ , ~, ~ ~ ~4 ~ '~"~. _ it ~~ ~~QI ` `~ _ ~ , ~--r I ~ I >~.. ~I ~~~ ~, __ I ~ IGii~jf ~~~ ~ ~°' 1 idYy%; Ili 1 ~i It ~ I ~ ' I ~' i e a I 7°p~y y',Yy'715'~ _ __-=`"~' I i II , ~I'1 d" i ~ lw 1 ' ~- 2 I' _~_ ~n, ~~(i cs ~ _ .' li Ir' I~ ~ _ ~'~ '"~ ~ 'v=s6>-_ ~ ~~ ~~ ~-__ __ ~'`t it I ~~l~Li III, i`-E - _ _~ ~I~' 1 '~-`~~ _~ w I~~+~~~Y I III it ~~- ~ ~. iti ~ ~ ~ 'I~ I . ~~ - 1 +,u..-~"'a'._ ' ijp_fti d ~I) y I i W l~(~:~1 ~' 1I ~ K" II '~ ~' I~ , ~ I I J I I.I~' ~J~ _ 1 ~i ~_ . ;I iI r i _ ~ III o - ~ - I,i l ' 1 - - r „ <a •, iI ,~,i, ~~ = ~ it it ._ °" I~ III~~ ~i III ,,~* '~I; 56'I 'I; ~'~ III I I~ 1 2 W 6 r f it ~ I i I~ U III'Y -', I , _...~ ' ~ ~, Y ~ ,r§~y" t~L'lin r" i.,~ I ». .. _.,f ,- yr_ ,- _ _.. _ - _ ~ - -yE„ - . a ., -----5+ _ --~- _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ .y~~_ _ - 1~ - ! ~ -. r,., _ - - . _~ ~I 1 ~ ~ ~ .-~yK ~ ~I i, i ~ i~ I I~ I I" _ 1 ~ 1 lam, I dr i ~ I , ~ ~ , IP I i -.~ ~ ,~ I _ ~ , '. EXIT ~-$ I x \'" ,a- tl ye . ~...m ~ .. ' c Q. LOT 1 sECnoN t-t " nr. + A~ 4 > rvu~ \ ' ~~ ` LOT 1 ASECTION 1-2 ~ " ? a3 ,. ,~, ,y ,._ ~?~. 63 erq ~.._ .w~" , mrl~ ~ '~t~ LOT 1 SECTION 1-3 i~ _F1 ~YY _.,ryj LOT 1 ~sECnoN t-a ~_=o LOT Z SECTION 2-1 ru .-m _.,.yl~ ~s ~."- Ss , _a v~ va ~ ^^_-~-- ~ " 9 ~GQa wi :9 LQ ~ ~~~e~o> ~ 8 "1 > M1 ,ro S LOT 2 SECTION 2-2 c ~ `" _,4.~ n _~ BQ G ~ a § tl B ~~ c3 €_~ E~~a~ /Q i ~ ~( 3 { C ' LOT 2 SECTION 2-a o^ '~ LOT 2 SECTION 2-4 ? a ~m n-. „ ..~ ,~._~•j F LOT 3 vsECT~oN 3-3 LOT 4 secnaN a-t LOT 4 ~sECrIDoN a-z r f r¢ ~, o.d ny F S~ S~ w~ y r C w S a -a s~ ` a .~ w- _ ~[ 4 g LOT 5 SECTION s-t • ~~~a o_ a efr~ e ;~ e° sp - e 3 ^ LOTS 4 SECT N 5-2 ` - <r ww ` 3- SEE SHEET-8 molmi BrotAers, !n~ ~ ' n„„e ek. ,..rte,,,. ~~ .~~.. .:.°'^r` 5~ M n 1 0 ~._ sk ..tr a§ GS =n g aY~¢ C 9 gar=,,.. -. _ ...„ x Y. ~ 1~ p a ~ ~ ~§ .§a^~ ` ,._ m ~ ~ ' ' LOT 6 SECTION 6-1 - ~2 ! ,._ . ~ ~- SEE SHEET-7 i a i" - ec .._ t cj xg cs er e§ LOT 9 ~SECTIroON 9-1 - LOi 6 SECTION 6-2 ~ ~- ll 9§F _ , avv ~ rl' ;F =y SECT ON 9-2 LOT 9 " '~ -= V_ ~ -~ A P t 1 ! • xi g u - e,, ~ it 1 1 ve ~, en~ . J -- _ ~ ~ ~ ' _ v a "" r ~.._ ! 3 i i LOT.7 SECTION 7-1 g 3I~- m- __ .,. ca .s ti ~ §! i !~ ~ ~3 • a.. r ~" n" §~' .~ ` .s ' t Je ' 3 e §` ^'- `e `' x ~' y LOT 9 SECTION 9-3 ' i 3 ~ ~a.a ° -- -_~_ v _ - l~ n i 5 LOT 7 SECT ON 7-2 , •+*m a ;# ~ A - ~a- t .. - it i i~ eI 9 ' $ LOT 10 SECTION 10-1 ~ 7 :~ LOTS SECTION 8-1p 3§~`~ rs 6~ ] a § i` 7 .,, ~' I a s ~ ~ is 3 ~~ e ~ :. " A ` i 4 LOT 10 SECTION 10-2 ~_ _ '9 v - e i e. lia4 u.s ..m rmic _ 1p im_ P H '~ ` -r e v a SEE SHEET-9 LOT 8 SE CTION B-2 i4i~ 7~ PPEC6[ GHAOINL PUE ~,~Qy ex`xVn-upi a `r~e: TR NO 1659' moles. Bro Lhers...nw ®' ~ ~ ~' M x Il' SEE SHEET-8 . 2 Rot ~ ~ Yk k ~ _ '; !, ~. , ~a.n F rp P~.iq ry'P~ R//II3 ~~ ' 111 LOT 1 1 SECTION 11-1 wu ~.m < Y~? F~ ?p ~~ in- /~ R< ~E . 3C RC ` R 6 ^'_ k~r i~ H as ~..,.. - ..~ - °„ a ~ . LOT 11 SECTION 11-2 .~.. ' ~p„ y. x LOT 1 SECTION 1-A '` ya Se pp v; so- ..m ie N ' mp aE q At arE _ .z ~.._ ~~ __ .~ . `~...e.w . i r _ .` h ~~ LOT 1 sECnoN 1-e ~ vp _ ' ~' p n i ~ ~ y 4 n ~ r .._e ¢ p s L~~„<.,w as p cry ~ p 'e is ~ S >!< ~~ 9= p r LOT 2 uSECT~ON 2-A .e p` AR ~+ LOT 2 SECTION 2-B rw< ..m n°- `~ it Ra A° 94 _p4 8 6° i _ _ ~ § ~ n _ _ eR si LOT 3 .. SECTION 3-A y [~ G 7'7 g qq1 3 t p _I ll ~r m, ~,.. 9c LOT 3 sECrrooN 3-B Ii g3 C S:l: ,..-a __ p Y . __ i ~ ] ~ _ _ ~ `m _ _ .. , ww ~nn w r ~ § ~ ~ LOT 4 secnoN a-A ~ i @ ~ J S. l ~_ ~~ t~, __ 1 l LOT 4 sECT~oN a-B ~ "O OE ¢ 4~ q A @ al ¢ IC H. it ¢ „a_ % R ~ E ,. E ¢ n 7 y . - 1 \ ~, LOT 4 sECTAoN a-c ~ ji E .E E}5 7 _ ',LOT 5 wsECTI~oN s-A ig` R i uE e~ :1 Ae ~}pp4q e y ol.. 'e rh i:~t p ti ~,,~, LOT 5 ~SECT~ON 5-B Sryy R 3 S+} Rb n ~t ~ Y P ~~LOT 5 ~ECTpON 5-C y~¢` aa's? 6 HF .i ' I¢~ _ 7 ~ I i ~m .row p'`' R LOT 6 uSECTI~ON 6-A SEE SHEET-10 eN^=cNf1RlR R RISOCIITIS Toll BrotLere, !no ~~--- o,.l .e .... .v a.Y .,~~ -rr-err"• x N SEE SHEET-9 °~ . LOT 6 SECTION 6-B ` ~.,-s~~d AT Aq ° LOT 6 sECrION s-c ,. LOT 7 SECTION 7-A xae - .~_ 3 : ' e s ° O 9 5 rp^ c LOT H SECTION A 8 e ~~_~~~ - P LOT 8 ~sECTION e-B gym- :a ~~ax Fip 44 t•C~ ~[ _:4 ~e„ ~ R t ^7 '9 ..~ Y mm\I n.m.o LOTpp 7 SECT?ON yy7-B ~' a9 c4 3 ._ °~~ 'a -e a ~a i c ~-_ i __-l.m cn.e 7 LOT ~ SECTION 7-C ErkE r-ro ~° ° ~.- a A~ 3@ "~!3 e. ~~«,- p ~~ ~ v 't ~,a_ E ~ ~ - .._ ~ ~ __ S i~ ?:p ? LQT 9 %SECTAON 9-A ,.. [ : - p 3 E p~ C3 I- - - - - "T ~- 'tl S 6 'tlk si; ;; g, =z LOT 9 sE~cnoN s-B A_ i ¢~ , ~.._ ~ ~~ S h SIp u g u.- ~ ~Jl .= q .., . wa 3. 'J LOT 9 sECnoN 9-C Ar w- E R m- Ee BeE pie LOT 1 O~SECTION 10-A s~ ~~ rix LOT 10 SECTION 10-C '-pi3 ~e LOT 11 sECTAoN t1-n .,\ 95 A e y~;2 g x. - BpE, LOT 11 SECTION 11-8 ~.._ 3~ s; LOT 11 sECrION n-c m-e B ,pro ,__ a` E 'LOT 11 SECTION 11-D y ~ ~ 6 ~ E ~ ~p __ ~ 8 *] LOT 10 SECTFON 10-8 ._ 6~e a :4 i5 i LOT 8 uSECTFON 8-C ®N^~'HfAAlR i AISOCIATIS Tolwl B-ofhersr"rtn~ ~T_ ~~-^- d Preliminary Landscape Plan TRACT ID2D2 ~~a ;=gL ~i=_~ -~ .. l` ~ 1 ul wlSE M2 Iril l~~~~rl WRR]M IE 61fPf ~~[~ ~ I ~ ~I i WaN_ SECiILN A d .ns~_-_ ~ I'1~ @~ A 9EE~Ip1_. C HIW 4DIR ROAD The Enclave II By Toll Brothers Tract 16592 Rancho Cucamonga, Cahforma DRC2005-00034 rqa , wLL LK[+n 11MNxxxxr a -_ B e~ RMIf PNEIR a ® _ ~_° ®~® ~~ ~ ~~ z ~ __ _._ ~ ~ ] < ~ _ ~~ ~~ si. __ ®~` °m~ e ~ = = II L019 ALL iWJ 9TORT Y _~... ®~®,~~z • • • E sur~osw wai~ne m~x d7 tl9NOWVJf170NJaN2 [Z~ OOOLIrILIfI N`dld 3dV~SONb'1 zsssi :Oval - 113nYl~N3 e 6e p eP S ~ ~ 9e !~ ~~ e!E gy 8 gee 9 88 ~! ,y ,! ~ :. ! .9a m-f 3y ~~e $ i E,f Pegpp ~s@ ~ ~ ~~gQg ~6° Iff9 ~ g°i} 1FQ ~ ~ ~ ~~ fe pQ~! €adt a fE g S ~ 671 ~Qif¢ ~ ~ ~'~ °~ ~ ! ~= Bd °d°p ~§~E dEggi g F~~q j gds gibe ~ ~~9~s ~ i 3Eid aq ~° i 1g °ee ~'gi ~idl g'gE~ ~ d`~~ 4 gg$~ ~6~~ ~; gdE1g f6 ~ a ~°~~ id {~ a a~ ~ ~~~ ~~lg g~i 4€~1d `~~~ ~iPA'i4' ~ g d~~ 6F s g~ I~d~ id dd id ~ ~~! ~i~g ~ ~ldd ~~~g~d Sgt°, 4:~l~ i;~~ 3i ~~~~~ ~~ t 0 E? e °pa !i 6Q gi a ~ 9! ~ ~ d' ge E 'J u ~~ ~§ °~ ~~~ ~~i~~ ~ t Illi~ e m a ~ p . a- __~ .._ _- ~._ -------- riooK .... _~ ~ ^wa Q° ______ _ _ ~_~~ L _ ~urcrgw - ~urar O .; ~.e .,.o r-~ _ -z __ ___ lip ~ e°• ., 3 ~- 1' '-- - ~ -- ~~ I ppP ~~_ - - =~~~- E~r~a ___________ moll ~. , _. ,~,. ,, ,® 0 0 _~. --. ~--::--- ~------- ro ers __ -- ; DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II sauna FOOrace RANCHO CUCAMONGA .ea naa au+ m rt evam near awa mrt '°`° v'° mrt DEL MAR c ucea a mrt FIRST FLOOR PLAN ~,~ A' mrt SIDE SLOPE ^- FIRST FLOOR PLAN ...,~,..,...,.~ 03-31-05 ~ • • • C~ SECOND FLOOR PLAN GZoll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEL MAR SIDE SLOPE SECOND FLOOR PLAN 03-31-OS 2 r~ N `" GToll brothers c s ,~ FIRST FLOOR PLAN DRC - 2005-00034 souwne roorwoe THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA '"` - "" TRABUCO SIDE SLOPE FIRST FLOOR PLAN 03-31-05 11 • • • v~~ L SA SECOND FLOOR PLAN moll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRABUCO SIDE SLOPE SECOND FLOOR PLAN 03-31-OS 12 '-~ o -- o X -~ °;:: ~°-~ MOOR -a ° ~ 1 _ I, LI'J~1_IIL I l ~ .. ~.. I I ~~ tlum1e ~ y `_ II V'IVMOa I I ~o^ n ®o® _ ,~! ~. ~ ,.~R~.. ~ ° YM• _ _ 6 ~f I I + O -~'~-i ' ' - "°'°~ ~___ cove C ~. i ~ moll ______~~ . _. ----------- rot ers ----. ' DRC - 2005-00034 --~~ THE ENCLAVE II aouuie.oo..oe 5~x ~ rt RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRABUCo '"" UPSLOPE ~~ FIRS~FLOOR PLAN 4 CAR GARAGE "" °'" ° FIRST FLOOR PLAN ,,..,,..,... ,.. 03-31-05 17 • • • - '; I I 'I ~~ I I I , II 1 I I i i I ~ ~i \ T C i i + ~ r P ` BOUI~FE FOOT~OE `= ; rmu •wmrt lJ Ft iow ..o n moll brothers ' DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCNO CUCAMONGA ~~ CARLSBAD DOWN SLOPE FIRST FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN -SPANISH COLONIAL EXTERIOR 03-31-05 23 ~~--- - .. O ® O ii ° arm ~ ~` ~ ® ' iE a e+M1v v ~ ,J ~O W IgCI( -- - ' \, 1 ownc I '°°w I ~ ~ ® ~ f I I I ...... - I wri . I i ® , ~ i . I ~__ ________J I ~mxc I I °S ® ~ ~ i I I •'' _i -, P I(RCIEN • ~ FpYER ~ ® •~i I I O __ eATM ~i•= ~'•~+ 1NLL1 e¢onawe auuoEi Fonw 1 ••• IAUMFY F L 1 I P-~ I I I I I I `O I ~ ~ I I fYAAGEI ~ I I I ~; I I I ~ , I I I I I I I - - J ~ ~ • • ~~ I J ~~ ~- ~ AI "II..,•" I ~~ SECOND FLOOR PLAN -SPANISH COLONIAL OPTIONAL FIREPLACE `Toll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD DOWN SLOPE SECOND FLOOR PLAN 03-31-05 24 L S A - ~ra ~~ i I 1 ~ ~ ~ O ^ V I ~~ ® + 1 I t I E ~:~~ ° I ~-- ~ ~ _ _ .. .. I `, 9 1 ~ - WII 7 T -- - A I - 1 ® I I I ~ Q A _----- I--- t. Ilq I - ~ tJ :~ d Y- I ® o ~ - ~ ~ r 11 ~`` I '' 1 • 1 II ~ 1 xncxex FOYER t ® ~~~ ® ~ I ql O __ __ axm ~ I ~ ~_ Exr3r 11 ®° O ®° - '^•^~ ] Fana ~ e 1 s _______ _______ _____ ~_ __ uuwm x-~ I~ ~ ~ ~ t I 1 ___ ~ I I GW1lft I I i I ~ } 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I ~ 1 1 ; ; 1 I I , I FIRST FLOOR PLAN -MANOR EXTERIOR SOUARE FOOTAGE moll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD UPSLOPE FIRST FLOOR PLAN 03-31-05 30 • a • L SA GToll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCNO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD UPSLOPE SECOND FLOOR PLAN 03-31-05 37 ~N o N wu~ne voor~oe ~u ~nrt • LSA moll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA REVERSE DOWN SLOPE FIRST FLOOR PLAN 03-31-05 40 • • • FIRST FLOOR PLAN • MANOR EXTERIOR _...._ _. _ m x m~ ,~ L SA ~___. SECOND FLOOR PLAN -MANOR EXTERIOR ~"oll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA REVERSE DOWN SLOPE SECOND FLOOR PLAN 03-31-OS 41 i ',; OVT. BONUS ROOM OVER DINING ROOM T~ ~x ERURRE FOOTIIOE m~-flmi FIRST FLOOR PLAN -MANOR EXTERIOR moll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA UPSLOPE FIRST FLOOR PLAN 03-31-05 50 • • ~~ ~~ IVI ~ BEDRODI.1 rr DpEN TO '- BELOW ~® :~ 0 o-- - ,,,~„ ~B ~ MNYWtlAW~ ' O ~ w OPEN i0 BELCw MM-eB.a~ u i; BEDAOOM~ I 1V I II ~° _.~, II -~1 O enrH~ y 9 y' ' e Tiv~ ~ i ~ ~ ^ 9 _ i BEDBO OMa ~ ~ ~ C ~ i BEDROOMI WIC "' ~ ~' l SECOND FLOOR PLAN -SPANISH COLONIAL EXTERIOR `ToU brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA UPSLOPE SECOND FLOOR PLAN 03-31-05 51 OVT. BOND! ROOM OVER DINING ROOM u v :9 ei~~ ~, Bi e 3 b~a c 3Ca ~E] ~~a a a=c~ Z W o~e~ ' ~ ua O~o O N ~~ ~ ~ M N W =~ p~0 V _ = N ~~~ D ti a~ ti O N y w 6 O E 4 z d~ ~ E y o Y e~° 3 4 0 ~ ~ boK 3E~ 3 > ;a= ~0 ~d w ~ ~ ~.a B m°- ~~ ~ w jy~_rtb~® S J =~e s~~ ~ :yy ~~C 949:: E y S~:~kSt.~: ~ ~(~'s'6'S'~- ' Tc-1 • e h '~ 2 N S W E F p z 30 ~ G o a ~~~ 9Y~ a ' ~ .eaau 4 J 2~~=~R~a°~ R ~a U :}'~F~F ~`R`yr: y `~L.~'w.CE:: F _~....=_^_R M = W o~a~ „a ado °o ~ oZv~ ~ yQM N W = C ~ ~ o ~ _ H ~~ D '~ OO 0 . Q ti a • • co i ~~ l~-X~ F3 N a O ~ ~ ~ M W = W o ~„ $ o O~~d' dZN ~~ aa:e t~ OQ~QQO O w, ~~~~~x a c v~~ H V M J }a ~ x~~~% S N W O ~ Q O Q ti 'y 0 0 • ~ h J TYPICAL ELEVATION NOTES I_ .e..i. ~..o.~~ o.+ce 20ll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEL MAR SIDE SLOPE TUSCAN 03-31-05 7 • • • RIGNT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION !I I w ~ o f z E 7 Y ~ O ~ ~ Ly Y ~ ~ ads _ § ~ y ~C~eE~g s w.~3! SHB:g~g` x QL S~i~~~C 9~ 3 u ~ yy Ems[ ;- y9~~GP~09~:: 7 F_..... secA Q p W p W ~ Z O aQ u~~~~ O o yv~ O Z v J O W N M ~ F V =~ = r a~ 0 0 • Q h • -rl ~ ~~ ~s~ ~- e aPl Grwm nnEw s~nvo~N~OTES ,.. ~Mru `` ~- ~I~~ I;~d 4~L `Toll brothers ~1 -- DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRABUCO SIDE SLOPE MANOR 03-31-05 14 ~~ `loll brothers r ROOF PLAN TTPICAL ELEVATION NOTES s m .ai.c O ~. DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRABUCO SIDE SLOPE MANOR 03-31-05 15 • REAR ELEVATION o~ g a = ~ W a v & I s aE2a, ~ e~ C z W ~ O ~ W ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ a "~ $ :s~~~~ a G ~ V u m 0 J~ N~ y y ~i2~a~ ~ a N ~ W E N O n A = F ? ~ ~ V ~ =Z ~,~ a 0 ~O O -~cv~s~- F-°~ ~~ .z n1 ~~ ~~ 0 oQ - - ----- -~ ~~ ~mwou ____ __ _______ ,:~, ,; n LEFT ELEVATION `~ -~`~Z TTPICAL ELEVATION NOTES ..,,,,..,... ,.. O `Toll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRABUCO UP SLOPE 4 CAR GARAGE MISSION 03-31-05 20 • • RIOIR ELEVATION N N °y w E z E 2 a ~ ~ M Z W °s sas ~ ~ Off C7 ;~~Eg~x c Od~ZN ~, ~t ~ ~ ~at~ po S , ° ~'~~g~ ~ s tf1 ~ > > J a y ~ `u 5~c8~, S O= V m y 0 y M } ~~aaa ~: y N W ~~ d~ ~ g ~-~..s-A ~ W v F Ova ~ F ~ a D !~ .y Y 3 r~ ~,~. ~~ ti a~ 0 . e h a EX~7-'gr'~" F-~~ M x N~ TYPICAL ELEVATION NOTES ^K! 41f M IC-COGiW~' u I o~ DRC - 2005-00034 moll ~rozhers ~N ~o ~~~'MO GA ~~ CARLSBAD DOWNSLOPE """""""" SPANISH COLONIAL ELEVATION 03-37 -05 25 • • • x ~~ ~~ TTP104L ELEVATION NOTES w c...~-... Sri. oc~~...i.~ o.G. 0 ~A RION7 ELEVATION moll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD DOWNSLOPE SPANISH COLONIAL ELEVATION 03-31-05 26 x '~ i REI1R ELEVATION I~ TTPICAL ELEVATION NOTES a •I uwa `Toll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD DOWNSLOPE SPANISH COLONIAL ELEVATION 03-31-05 27 • • • ROOF ULAN N t~ ~ Z O aa ~ ~ OW Op ~ ~ a ~ a ~tid ~ 3~ - ~ g ~'~ IA tatm H OWr J y ~ s?`~~~`e 2~$;a~3~i~~ a a" Q 3 x s; (~ O Z N W 7 v~ O a ~ J y We"1 d ~O ~~ ~3y~ i~§ tf ~ E~~ , F ~ ~~= :: ~ a W r Z v V ~ O C P F9 -.... .a. _ . ap . ~ p ~ Q ~ 4~ +~ OO O • e J LY~VY'L~Q'S"~. ~~JC 1 s TTPIGAL ELEVATION NOTES I' ~ - I 2"011 brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD UPSLOPE MANOR ELEVATION 03-31-05 33 • • R16XT ELEVATION J~ TYPICAL ELEVATION NOTES L SA O ~. DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 moll ~3ro~hers RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD UPSLOPE MANOR ELEVATION 03-37-05 34 ROOF FLAN r n U M w ~a % ~ ~~ e ;a o s E a~ ~ z~ % a~ aka y k B J`yy~~~~~~~ ~~~~ y ate` 349'4 4'Y4 $}& u_ yyF~l. 3p D_ 9~A ii S'. f~I F ~i i 34 ~~ s 0 s a=~ @7W z °o~amy N~7~W N W =Q~ V F ti '~ OO Z O Q W ~W W~ J W~ NJ Z ~ C ~ 0 ~~ -~9 • ~ h J _ ~ -~1 TYPICAL ELEVATION NOTES .m.ixc vc ~~urw~a vween o.c. s ,~ moll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD REVERSE UPSLOPE CRAFTSMAN ELEVATION 03-31 A5 37 • • REAR ELEVATION ROOF PLAN x ~tl N TYPICAL ELEVATION NOTES DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~1 moll brothers SANREVERSE I~'°' """""""" DOWN SLOPE MANOR ELEVATION 03-31-05 42 S~ x ~~ ~~ I~ TYPICAL ELEVATION NOTES O LEFT ELEVATION moll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA REVERSE DOWN SLOPE MANOR ELEVATION 03-31-05 43 • • • v v aQ z O ~Q~y j ~o ~ ~ W W, O ~ a O W SF '~3 ~ V = z Q D ~ ~ H z ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ z ~~ ~' n rw o ~ g~i5~ ~ g ~ `~J a ~ 9~ iia s~ 's w` w ~~ s~~'a~" a ~ ~~~ ~ ^- ~~~A~~@~~ y 0 LXc~ ~ ` ~~ I • ~ h J N v ti '~ ti 0 LJ ~X ~T ~Zy ~--/o D z w J ~ _ Q ~ O ~ s~ ~ ; ? o OWOQ W > d O Q > ~ o >` ~ $ ~ ~ a ~~y ~3~~2e~ ~8y Y ~ y ~ ~ a ~ a y ~ J C1 Q ~ J y WQ J r ~ e" ~~a;~2` t~~ " z N W G Q W Z O ~ s ~. n e@5a s9~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ tl ~ = Z ~ 3 Z Q a cR F ~i~Rv ~ ~ H ~ ~ = Q C F m a ~€ ~~ 5 V i N W 0 a w J W u L$ ~~ ~a s~gE" E~~ S .~-~~~eaiE3~c~~3 ~ ~E~:x~s.:i~c~55 -nn~.n •9 ni lCA^ Q ~ ~_ ~ z O W ~ 0 o aOC~ O V~ W 0 ~ > W M m v N W= F~ 3 M Z 0 V=Za D N ~ ~ ~ N f a~ 0 0 ~~~ y_ t i 3 ~~~ 3~~ ~2~ ~ P h J N N ~']C~rF-~~` Z'7 Z o v ~~ ~ g'x' ~p~a~ d ~O ~ F ~e a5e OV M 9 ~zs a e ~ Vm ~ W ~.g3~~~~ gg N W p Q ~ d ' d' O O d V}- 9~~a9~[€: ~ -... .,..9 W t1 Z y ~ Z Q Q ~ H G a~ 0 0 • e h ~~ LEFT ELEVATION TTPIGAL ELEVATION NOTES O LSA .,~,,.. w ....a.o w~ ~-` moll ~3rotliers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA UPSLOPE MANOR ELEVATION 03-31-05 53 • R16NT ELEVATION a us .~ ~Z~ F ~S ~Z~ 5 F~, ~~ z M_Z~ O N ~• O W OQ F ° 'a ? ~ O~Q~ d ~O ~~ 3, ~~uQOW~ 03 ~~ 3 $ ~ OV7mJJ{'7 v w W Q $ ~` ~b~ g O Z ~ w? ;~e~ g g NWOa?d'O w :~e.$~:x~ s ' W v Z 0 ~~~x~iF€5~ Y p ~ ~~ ~ ti a~ 3 0 O • e a T V' L 5 A R/W I I I I h- I /' IS -~ NORTH /SOUTH SITE SECTION (1-3) _ LOT1 EAST / WEST SRE SECTION (7-A) ~,R ,.> LOT t DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA ll b th m ers ro o SIDE SLOPE LOT 1 03-31-05 9 • • 31-0 I I I ~ I I _ I I - r, I I I ~--~ - I. is-a I I _ l/fl I I I i NORTH /SOUTH SITE SECTION J ~ s ,a ~ j II I I /o I ~R I I , ~~~~~~~~~~~/////iii.,.. moll brothers R/W I I I I I I I I I DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRABUCO SIDE SLOPE LOT 2 03-31-05 16 I ~, s/-o L EAST /WEST SITE SECTION (2-B) _,.,. LOT 2 .Y N~1 1 1 vo i~ ~~~1L_//111C11LL11~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~f _ ~f ~~ ~ - ~~II_/°s II ' ~ $ ~`'-~ 8 MIN :~ e. .~~ iJ, ~ u / I I ~, to-o' I i NORTH /SOUTH SITE SECTIO_N_ (33) LOTS R~W I I I I i I i j~//~GL L11J1_/JJ_LL11J_L /LL ~-+k/ jG!1J /L Ll /J Lll1~11J /LLL ~ ~ I ~ I i r ~R I / ~ ° ~ ~ I EAST /WEST SITE LOT 3 L S A DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA moll brothers SIDE SLOPE LOT 3 03-31-05 10 ~ • i m ~' ~~ o-s~ .\~~ - » ~, ~` /~~ v ~e ~~ 00 Z J ~'--- --~ .~\~~ °°s~- ~ ~~~\ ~~ ~' ~~ ~ -bpi 0 I° v- a c~ W O ~ ° ~ Q d G u ,~~ ~ym pa oZ v~ y~t%~ J N W ~ a V 0 d ~ ~= ZZ p~ oC a~ e ~ ~;W ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i I •~ I r~ o I R ~~ I I ~~ ~ I ... ]1-a L A Air e I. 15-4 I_ I ~f +F I i NORTN /SOUTH SRE SECTION (&1) y„, ,K , u LOTS ~ i ~ '~l~ f O I •'~ ~..._ ' .. ~ I I ri I I I o I I /o io I I ~.;, ~ ~,.. I e (N I m -o' i5-0 EAST /WEST SITE SECTION (SC) , ~ LOT 5 DRC • 2005.00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA moll brothers DOWN SLOPE ~, LOT 5 .,.,,,,.,... ~.. 03-31-05 28 • . • a I ~: ~`? i i o-s~, ~~ 3 /~~ u~ ~------ ~~\~\ ------- a ~ °o> ~ m p ~ o~ a ~ m ~mQ O Z N W v O a Z~ M 3 J 0 V= z a G GF ~ N a~ 0 ^^~ RiW ~1JJLL ~<VJGLl~!/J_L LLL LLIJ~~ I -4 ~ V,~ I ___ '"]]LLLLYYY~VVV(((((~~~~Y11111 I _ II I, R, II ~// I !~._ I .wJ _ I_ ~1 0 k A_, I 5 0 ~I Jr I NORTH / SOUTH SRE SECTION (7-1) e -r LOT 7 I ~Q ] r EAST /WEST SITE SECTION (T-C) „~~_ ,Y LOT 7 DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA moll brothers DOWN SLOPE LOT 7 03-31-05 29 • . • HiW ,~~SL~~~~~~~ I ) J ~ I ~- ~~_'' _ NORTH /SOUTH SITE SECTION v~ ,, I ,r ~~ ~~~~~~~~ ® ~ LL1J I ~l/ ~o ~~ ~~ EAST /WEST SITE SECTION (&C) ~,~.,~ LOT 8 moll brothers DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE it RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA DOWN SLOPE LOT 8 03-31-05 49 N N M 2 W W O~ ~? Op~O OZvmqq y~M N W D¢ d J 0 W v F 7 V=Z z ~ p~o~ ~~ °i~ x ~/~ i \\Y i i ~ o ~ ~ it ~ ~ -~ r ~ _ N ~ ~ O _ I N 1` F P ~ ~ ~ Q ^V~_1 ~` ~~ Q ~~ Z J r U W ~ S~~ ~~ w _ H & . - - _ - o % N H J O N m c r O o 2 J ~~_ ~~ ~V j3-~7 ~ • W I o i _ ~~ ~' A r~- ._-R - NORTH /SOUTH SITE ~ ~~~L LlJ LLL1JJL~~~~ RiW I /~ I I `~ II I - I I ,~ i I I /"' r.. ~ I / - .eJ j ~l I y,a_a ~, .5-0 EAST / WEST SRE SECTION (10.8) q„r,T r r LOT 70 `I"oll brothers R/W I I I I I DRC - 2005-00034 THE ENCLAVE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA UP SLOPE LOT 10 03-37 -05 55 o~ e~ ~-z W o>~a ~~'~ O~ V m O T T u7 v~ W F~ N W O Q d J 0 W v V ~ -------- - + ~ Q _ G ~ C \~ .a-n V „- ~` \\~ 4 rr~w ~~~ ~~~ ojsi~ ~~~ ~ j ~ ~_ ~' a ~~ ~ ~ ~ F \\`, e c \_ i ~ 8 \\_ ~ ~ \\\V``~ i E \l\\~ 9 a-a ~ ~~ a ~~ ~ U \\~ F O - N { W _ _ 0-SI 3 ~ J °-a\ ?~ ~ -----\\ -- IS o Z &_ _ O f W N W F N I F 7 O N -I- O F ~______ ___ 2~J ~, ~X~~" ~-~ ° ~- ~~ • • - NOTE PLANTING SNOwN AT 5 YEAR GRO`MF7 a... "° 4 E .,n. P I ~c 6 _____ r" p 4~ 1 y- r "® i~ "- ~ is ~}I ~._9p SECTION D-D SINGLE STORY- _ ---p~ ems. 5 py NF )Ip"' ~ ep fE~ es ~Qe e ~ ~ 1 l F ~ .r. ~_ 3 tl Be ~,3 ________ _______ ___~ ~rt r i ~_ s- - __ y__n {~ - SECTION D-D TWO STORY R~ 1~ i __ P pq, e ~} pp w.u.e~. Y __ 9'iY t3 ~~ ~ p e~ F9~ -'" __'___Ye R'~ ~~ l~pq ~_ I- - ". f_~________ y- F nn S - ~ Sea _ ~------ SECTION E-E ,, ~\ s,- ~ ~~ I ~~. ~' - ~ 4 iE y J ~t~ x, v ~ 'C A ~~'~' . ~v', ti<,;rr.. ~~ ~ ' ,, ~ . A ~ i•'S~ 9' i. s ~~~, ~ ~A~ ~~ PLAN ' ~ ~ `~~ ` _ ENCLAVE II ' V ~ i'~ `~ ~ ~~ TRACT 18592 CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LINE OF SIGHT SECTIONS PREPARED BY PREPARED BY PRFPAREB FOR D '.~,.°~.`.~, MUNSA KER fi ASSOCIATES Toll Brothers, Inc _ ~ o coun~a. .o..n smrz sw pdao •~ ~ ~; ®ru.ac ooanw awKree J:5 ro.x ov.wce c. Jese - SiW 9MIX AbOO/.16 y ~4~ ~~ ~rtMO.mw (I ~.) 9J5-OIPo .. (l,.) 9J5-9)~1 _ _ _ NOTE PWMING SnOWN AT 5 YEAR GROWTIi 913 ~W ~c .1 ~ Be RC _ _ e x r.- tl 1 ~ ~~ ~ T ~ ~_ w _p~"® °I SECTION h-A ~ ,9 -- ~= ~----~-~ ----- --- - dr ~, -: e ilk e SECTION H-B-SINGLE STORY .® ~ - - - _ T e v,o ,~_ _. i~t pW,. v NN SECTION F1-B-TN/O STORY ~~- pi ~+ ti e a ii of e ee ~ g ,.,_ _ _ _3~i_ iE ----~~_ _"_E- - '.t r ,~_ ,e,4.,o. -----~--------------- e a,. '_- SECTION H-C °~ e9 .I? i a~ Y~ .. ~ ,},v. / ~ ~ 3j( i ~ ~~ a\ ' \/\ ~~ ~' f f °i, fj{9q t` P ~ ~ P ~ q i ; . + ~ ~. ~ ~. r• ,, ~ PLAN ~~,;7 ~~i+,, ~sw~J~J~ Y..~ _ K ~~ ~P ~'P ~ y- ~ ~~ rr~l ~ ENCLAVE II °"d"``"`10f0roGror r ~/ ~ ~ r,J e •'F; ti' THACrws9x '>=a~a~1rBB/?acu;Rwc sJ (°1,' :~ , ~ ~ ~~'. ~'~ : /{' ~ cm of RANCHO cucawNCA \s '~' ' ,ti / moo, <; a, r ' ~n'i i~...,~ LINE OF SIGHT SECTIONS '--L~' ~ A ~~tt~;i dal / .~} ~ (B9D t,~ia`~Y~ • _- ABED BY f •. PREPARED BY PRFPAR(D fOR \~~ 5 ~~~'~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ \ ~ ~~ ~ °.,'"6.p:.~: HUNSAKER 6 ASSOCIATES Toll brothers, Inc - ~ ° ~4 ~"~` -~"~//~ .'f ~. w~`' 't LJf1LJflaO ~- ® o, Mma.rc vnrwe ae..cr c. ee T A°~AiL9 ~T,ru.w, w~ Mow ~RMOaw (J~.) 9J5-OlPo / . (l~.) 9J5-91~/ idea°i/5i' ~6~I~~II IIhI P ! 1 0 F U I U 0 ! 1 1 x-13 n J ~~ __V ~a~~ .~• V I~~ p 4 1 1 .t S \ `v / / ~ ~ e W UZ U8 _~ ~ 0 Q ~ a W ~ - A W 0' 4` I- ~ >mUN E 0 _ U. QVQ a~i~ ° ~e: Z ~ Zaz y n Oo~B O> W~~ LL ~ ~~ c e H J ~ ~ w ~ " c c J G U ^ ` Q J F" W r CA r , i O ~~ T RRqq ' `y' V .C O ~ m ~A v c i °y_ ,,yy~ r _M~ ~ ~ y of Aa / ~ ~ ~ ~ `~~/ ~~~ /` . ~ :~ - -, r ~y 0 ~ ~ Z ~ / t x~,"' ~ '~ L 'i \ ~1 .} In a~ ~` ~' .~ ,t ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ''~~ w - ~ m= F g < ~~ 3 i~ Z by ~-~ `\/~ ®~ €~ ~~ ~~ ~~ m a Ij u ~O €#~, f[. ~~F ~ ; ~~ _ ~_'=~ 4~ ~ ~~J~ ~ ~ °ti '~ //__//lam f /l'"~~ ~ l ~ ~ ti ~~~ .~~~ f /.~ °~ _ j e ,~r ^_„ - _ v ~- - >: -'~ . . \ o-, ~ 6 ' P 6 0 (~ Z ? 3 ~~~ ~; DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 10 p m Donald Granger February 28, 2006 • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC -The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for 11 single-family lots on 7 59 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Hillside Road - APN 1061-561-05 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592, Minor Exception DRC2004-00076, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00075 On May 26, 2004, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration Design Parameters The 7 59-acre site is predominantly covered with sparse vegetation The protect site has native grades that average 10 percent, with 50 feet of fall from the north boundary to the south boundary of the subdivision The site is bounded on the east by Archibald Avenue, to the south by Hillside Road, to the west by future Tolstoy Ranch Road, and to the north by a subdivision that was recently completed by Toll Brothers, Inc (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 and Development Review DRC2004-00061) The site is surrounded by residential uses to the east, across Archibald Avenue, immediately to the north, and to the south, across Hillside Road To the west is 8 9 acres of vacant land that had an approved 12-lot tentative tract map (SUBTT16012) but was never recorded and has since expired All properties to the north, south, east and west are zoned Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units • per acre) Adtacent to the protect site is the historic landmark Demens-Tolstoy Ranch House on an approximate 3-acre parcel The proposed protect consists of four 2-story floor plans that range in square footage from 4,746 square feet to 5,864 square feet The product includes two plans (Santa Barbara and Carlsbad) that were recently constructed by Toll Brothers, Inc on Tract 16262, lust north of the protect site, and two new plans (Del Mar and Trabuco) Architectural styles include Manor, Tuscan, Mission, Spanish Colonial, and Craftsmen The protect site is located within the Hillside Overlay District, which regwres architectural design techniques that mirnmize the amount of grading and allow the house to follow the natural grades The protect has been designed so that all floor plans have stepped pads with an overall elevation change of 2 1/2 feet or greater, thus meeting the design goals of the Hillside Overlay District The Community Trail along Hillside Road, from Tolstoy Ranch Road east to Archibald Avenue and along Archibald Avenue north from Hillside Road to the north boundary of the subdivision, will be installed with the protect Prior to the subdivsion being approved (Tentative Tract SUBTT16592), a Pre-Application Workshop was conducted in May of 2003 by Elba Inc At the workshop (see attached minutes), the Planning Commission emphasized the importance of house product being sensitive to and compatible with the adtacent Demens-Tolstoy House The subdivision and house product proposed by Elba, Inc was approved by the Planning Commission in May of 2004 Toll Brothers, Inc has since purchased the subdiwsion from Elba Inc The perimeter fencing plan proposed by Toll Brothers, Inc (tapered river rock pilasters and split-face block) is identical to the previously approved plan Staff is pleased with the architectural treatment to the elevations on all plans, the variation utilized in the roof planes, and the strong use of materials that have been selected to create a visually attractive product • FX~~ H ~} ~D DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC February 28, 2006 • Page 2 Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provde an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect 1 The house product proposed by Toll Brothers, Inc is similar scale and massing to the previous product by Elba, Inc , however, Toll Brothers, Inc is proposing all 2-story product, whereas the prior development by Elba, Inc had four lots plotted with a 1-story product (Lots 4, 5, 8, and 11) to protect wews of the historic Demens-Tolstoy Home The City Council policy is to require a mix of 1-story units Typically, new protects are within a mix of 10 to 20 percent of the lots plotted with 1-story product Toll Brothers, Inc has taken sales reservations or deposits on all the lots and staff has received a letter (attached) from the future homeowner of Lot 11 indicating the reasons against 1-story product Staff has also received a. phone call from the future homeowner of Lot 4 expressing a strong desire to keep the 2-story product The Design Review Committee should review the 2-story plotting mix in light of the May 28, 2003, Workshop minutes (attached) and the 1-story plotting goal and provide direction and input as necessary The Detailed Site Plan shows the relationship between the historic Demens-Tolstoy Home and the proposed homes • Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1 All interior private yard slopes are regwred to be landscaped with ground cover, shrubs, and one tree per 150 square feet of area 2 River rock shall be real, or native fieldstone may be used Stone veneers are not permitted 3 Provide decorative pavement on driveways Decorative driveways shall have variation throughout the subdivision 4 No wood fencing is allowed Construct block walls between homes (i a along interior side and rear property line) for permanence, durability, and design consistency 5 Access gates to rear yards should be constructed of a material more durable than wood Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 6 Taper three- orfour-car driveways down to standard two-car width at the street Staff Recommendation• Staff recommends that with the Mator Issue addressed to the satisfaction of the Design Review Committee, the Committee recommend approval to the Planning Commission • EX~zT H-1 ~-- ~'~ DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC February 28, 2006 Page 3 Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Donald Granger The Committee recommended approval as proposed, however, admonished the applicant that their next project must include cone-story mix and articulation to all sides ~X~~-T- ~ Z • • • ~'' b C~ n u BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2005-00034 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map 16592 3. Description of Project: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00034 - TOLL BROTHERS, INC -The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for 11 single-family lots on 7 59 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Hillside Road - APN 1061-561-05 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592, Minor Exception DRC2004-00076, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00075 On May 26, 2004, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental revew or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration The 7 59-acre site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Hillside Road The proposed Development Review is for the design review of building elevations and • detailed site plan for a previously approved tentative tract map (SUBTT16592) A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted on May 26, 2004, for the 11-lot subdivision (SUBTT16592) The proposed Development Review will not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration No new environmental information has been presented that would raise or create new or adverse impacts not already considered in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration All mitigation measures included in the resolution of approval for the subdivision (SUBTT16592) will be included as conditions of approval for the proposed Development Review 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Toll Brothers, Inc 725 Town and Country Road, Suite 500 Orange, CA 92868 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) 6 Zoning: Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 7 59-acre site has a previously approved tentative tract map (SUBTT16592) The protects site has native grades that average 10 percent, and drains to the southeast The site is bounded on the east by Archbald Avenue, to south by Hillside Road, to west by future Klusman Avenue, and to the north by an approved subdivision Adtacent to the site is the Demens-Tolstoy House, a local historic landmark The 7 59-acre site is surrounded by residential uses to the east, across • Archibald Avenue, and future single-family residences to the north, south, and west /~-' Initial Study for Development Review DRC2005-00034 Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 2 (X) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to an earlier Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect Signed - ~"_"'9r-~ Donald Granger Associate Planner May 2, 2005 • • n - ~L' Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Develooment Review DRC2005-00034 Page 3 • EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 Mitigated Negative Declaration (Adopted May 26, 2004) (/) Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 Mitigation Morntonng Program (Adopted May 26, 2004) • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Irntial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no sigrnficant environmental effects would occur Signature _-~i ~' l~ ~~ Date a ~ ~6 -0 6 Print Name and Title Pr~nDlen PaK~.! lff5'S~+v~f Ir~P~t /~a..,~yt.~ • /4--gam City of Rancho Cucamonga • NEGATIVE DECLAFZATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the Califomra Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentatroe Tract Map SUBTT16592 and Development Review DRC2003-01139 Public Review Period Closes: May 26, 2004 Project Name: Tolstoy Ranch Estates Protect Applicant: Elba, Inc Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the north side of Hillside Road and on the east side of Tolstoy Ranch Road - APN 1061-561-05 Protect Description: A residential subdivision of 11 single-family lots on 7 59 acres of land m the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) and the design review of building elevations and detatled sde plan for those lots FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is • proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Imtial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially sigmficant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no sigmficant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a sigmficant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negatwe Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period <~~ ~4 Mav 26 2004 • Date of Determination A opted By J~3--~(0 • RESOLUTION NO 06-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00034, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 11 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16592 ON 7 59 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ( 1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE W EST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1061-561-OS A Recitals 1 Toll Brothers, Inc. filed an application for Development Revew DRC2005-00034, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 26th day of April of 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on April 26, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on the north side of Hillside Road, west of Archibald Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 480 feet on Hillside Road The property has an approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592, and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single-family homes that are very similar in mass, form and square footage and is zoned Very Low Residential, the property to the south is developed with single-family homes and is zoned Very Low Residential, the property to the east, across Archibald Avenue, is developed with single-family homes, and the property to the west is vacant land that is zoned Very Low Residential, and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicirnty, and , d The applicant conducted one neighborhood meeting to inform the surrounding • neighborhood residents of the proposed project and to obtain their feedback One resident attended the meeting and indicated support for the project, and ~~-~ / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-42 DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC April 26, 2006 Page 2 • e The protect design meets or exceeds the Very Low Residential District Basic Development Standards, and f The design of the single-family houses accomplishes a 360-degree architectural treatment by the application of complementary primary and secondary materials and architectural elements to all sides of the dwelling units, therefore, the architectural design of the protect meets the design goals of the General Plan and Development Code 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting on Apnl 26, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds and concludes as follows: a That the proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan; and b That the proposed design is m accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district m which the site is located; and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mtunous to properties or • improvements m the vianity 4 Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the Cty's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on May 26, 2004, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 and Development Review DRC2003-01139 Pursuant to CEQA Gwdelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required m connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same Frotect unless (i) substantial changes are proposed to the protect that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment, (n) substantial changes have occurred in the arcumstances under which the protect was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts, or (ui) new important information shows the protect will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered, or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. a The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Development Review DRC2005-00034, that substantial changes to the protect or the cvcumstances surrounding the protect have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated m the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 and Development Review DRC2003-01139 The applicant is proposing house product on previously approved Tentatroe Tract Map SUBTT16592 The site, grading, landscape, and architectural design of the proposed protect are m substantial compliance with the previously approved Development Review DRC2003-01139 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 Staff further finds that the protect will not have one or more significant effdcts not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not regwred to reduce the impacts of the protect to a level of less-than-significant The proposed Development Review of 11 houses on previously approved ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-42 DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC April 26, 2006 • Page 3 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 will not cause one or more significant effects on the environment or need additional mitigation measures since the proposed project has been designed to be consistent with the previous project site, grading, street configuration, drainage, and house plotting locations. b. Based on these findings and all evidence m the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is regwred pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Development Review DRC2005-00034 c Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends The Planning Commission evaluated any potential impacts to biological and wildlife resources during the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 and concluded that there would be no impacts to biological and wildlife resources that could not bemitigated to aless-than-significant level. Since the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration on May 26, 2004, there have been no changes in arcumstances under which the impacts to biological and wildlife resource were evaluated. There are no significant changes to the proposed project, Development Revew DRC2005-00034, that were not evaluated under the Mitigated Negatnre Declaration for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592. Based on substantial • evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5.) 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The plans submitted for plan check shall be consistent with plans on file with the Planning Department as approved by the Design Review Committee on February 28, 2006 2) Where private local trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be used Where a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0 5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the sidewalWstreet The private trail between Lots 1 and 2 shall provide a concrete gutter with water bars spaced accordingly. The final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval during Grading Plan check • 3) Where slope conditions require retaining walls to achieve 15 feet of usable rear yard area, provide a logical transition to allow access onto R"-~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-42 DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC April 26, 2006 Page 4 the slopes for maintenance purposes, such as stays, ramps, etc Rear yards with downhill slopes and stair access shall have hand rails on either side The final design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner, prior to issuance of Grading Permits. 4) Trail improvements shall be installed per City Standard Drawing No 1002-A (Reverse Frontage Parkways) for the Community Trail on Hillside Road and per City Standard Drawing No 1003 (Side Area Parkways) for the Community Trail on Archibald Avenue 5) The private parkway single gates shall be installed per City Standard Drawing No. 1008 for the four lots that have duect access to the Community Trail on Hillside Road. 6) Local Feeder Trails shall be constructed with decomposed granite and a 4-inch minimum base. All rocks and debns shall be removed, and the trail surface shall be graded smooth. 7) A 5-foot double, solid non-wood gate (10-foot total width) shall be installed at each trail access location to the horse corral area LJ 8) Provide decorative perimeter fencing (i a ,masonry) at the tract edges and along the streets "Decorative" means stucco finish, split-face or . slumpstone block or similar textured surface with native stone pilasters and a cap Smooth precision block is not acceptable. All walls shall have a block cap 9) Retaining walls exposed to public wew are to be decorative masonry All walls shall have a block cap. 10) Return walls and corner sidewalls are to be decorative masonry and compatible with the architectural style "Decorative" means stucco finish, split-face, or slumpstone block All walls shall have a block cap 11) The developer shall prowde each prospective buyer of comer lots written notice of maintaining the landscaped parkway The written notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer prior to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 12) Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real or native fieldstone Other forms of stone may be manufactured products 13) All interior side and rear walls shall be of block material 14) Along the east property line of Lot 5 and the south property lines of Lots 3 and 4, the split-face wall shall include 6 to 8-foot high river rock pilasters at the corners and 75 to 100 feet on the center Final design shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval • ~'~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-42 DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC April 26, 2006 Page 5 15) Along the south property lines of Lots 5 through 8 adtacent to the Community Trail along Hillside Road, a 6-foot high split-face wall shall be constructed with river rock pilasters The pilasters shall be placed at the rear corner of each lot The final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval 16) The 6-foot split face wall along the east property line of Lot 4 shall have 6-foot high aver rock pilasters at the corners and 75 to 100 feet on the center The final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval Enoineenng Department 1) Construct a 6-foot wide curb adtacent sidewalk on the parkway between Lots 4 and 5 The back of the sidewalk shall be rock-scaped, and no street trees wdl be allowed. 2) All applicable conditions of Planning Commission Resolution Nos 04-62 and 04-63 approving Tentative Tract Map 16592 shall apply Environmental Mitigation • 1) The applicant shall implement all mitigation measures adopted for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 on May 26, 2004, as shown m Planning Commission Resolution No 04-62 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the • Planning Commission held on the 26th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-42 DRC2005-00034 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC April 26, 2006 Page 6 AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • u • ~--~ a Protect No DRC2005-00034 Completion Date COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00034 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENATIVE TRACT SUBTT16592 APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS LOCATION: APN 1061-561-05 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. Completion Date General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its '~-/- agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Clty may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-42, Standard ~-/- Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to ail parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Development/Design Review approval shall expire If building permits are not Issued or approved _/_/_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12006 Res & Stf Rpt\ORC2005-00034 StdCond 4-26 doc ~} -~i3 Prgect No DRC2005-00034 Comoletion Date C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include _/_/_• site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/~_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~~_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with ail sections of the Development Code, all ~_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/~_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults S Ail building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, ~~_ including proper illumination 9 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed _/_/_ control, In accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in confunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced _/~_ with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as ~_/_ veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access Is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora ~_/_ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail _/~_ with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet 2 • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00034 StdCnond~4-26 doc /'!- ~ `7 Protect No DRC2005-00034 Completion Date e For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at _/_/_ least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with • 10 appropriate tencing and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine Conditions nts Th C / / , , ovena e _ _ _ animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs 11 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the ~_/_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 12 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/~_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 13 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all ~_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for communityconcems, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 14 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's • 15 perimeter Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than ~_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 16 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood ~_/_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 17 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 18 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The _/_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 19 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products • 3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12006 Res & Stf Rpl\DRC2005-00034 StdCond 4-26 doc ~'I S Protect No DRC2005-00034 Completion Date D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home Landscaping in _/_/_• the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in ~_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed Landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 ~_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted In staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously ~~_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition • 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required perthe Development _/_/ Code This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in ~_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/~_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 9 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the J_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 10 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/~_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code E. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways ~_/_ in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 4 . I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM~2006 Res 8 Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00034 StdCond 4-26 doc ~" -/ (~ Protect No DRC2005-00034 Comolellon Date 2 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cast of -/-/- implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the • amount of $ 495 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe City to retain consultants and/or payfor City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit F. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location -/_J- of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permts APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following -/-/- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, • c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conddioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2005-00034) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report -/~- Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to -/-/- the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls -/-/- 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can -/-/- contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements • 5 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res & Sd Rpt\DRC2005-00034 StdCond 4-26 doc /~--~1 . / Protect No DRC2005-00034 Completion Date H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_. marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/~_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays I. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/ /_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/~_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturers "high wind" instructions ~~_ G di • ng ra J. 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the Slate of California to _/~_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Gwl Engineer • 1 \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & SH Rpt\DRC2005-00034 StdCond 4-26 doc ~~ D Prgect No DRC2005-00034 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR .COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the Clty for all Interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-oi-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 52 total feet on Archibald Avenue 42 total feet on Hillside Road 40 total feet on Tolstoy Ranch Road 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings Archibald Avenue, Hillside Road, Tolstoy Ranch Road 5 Prvate drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 6 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted bythe City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development • 7 / / / / /_/ /_/ / / / / / / / / /-J / / / / I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res 8 SH Rpt\DRC2005-00034 StdContl 4-26 doGc ~- I Protect No DRC2006-00034 Comolehon Date Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter A-C Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trad Other Archibald Avenue X X X X X X Hillside Road X X X X X X Tolstoy Ranch Road X X X X X X "A" and "B" Streets X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item 4 Improvement Plans and constructlon a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street Ilghts, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic slgnal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civli Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the CIry Englneer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Ciry Englneer and the CIry Attorney guaranteeing completion of the publlc and/or private street Improvements, pnorto final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In publlc right-ot-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the CIry Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the CIry Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the CIry Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per CIry Standards or as directed by the CIry Engineer Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours dunng construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the CIry Engineer Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots Street names shall be approved by the Clty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check / / -~-~- ~-~- / / -/-~- • / / ~-~- -/~- -~-~- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res 8 Sd Rpt\DRC2005-00034 StdCOnd 4-26 doc /~`lU0 Protect No DRC2005-00034 Completion Date Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per Clty Standards In accordance with the Clry's street tree program 6 Install street trees per Clry street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall Include a line Item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree speaes based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer r~ LJ Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Dry Klusman Avenue Magnolia Southern Magnolia 8' 30' 15 FIII P A Less than 8' grandflora O C Gallon In P A Less than 8' Magnolia NCN 3' 20, 15 FIII grandiflora O C Gallon in Street trees listed below are to appear on LMD Plans, listed for reference only -not to appear on Street improvement Plans Archibald Avenue Plantanus acenfolla London Plane Tree 8' 30' 15 Forground Tree O C Gallon P A 8' greater P A Less than 8' Pyrus calleryana NCN 3' 20' 15 'Aristocrat' O C Gallon Under Power Lagerstoemia Crape Myrtle 3' 20' 24" Lines Indica 'Tuscarora' Hybrid -Pink O C Box Backround Tree Magnolia NCN 3' 25' 15 - with Platanus grandiflora O C Gallon 'St Mary' - with Pyrus Platanus acenfolla London Plane Tree 8' 30' 15 O C Gallon Accent Tree Lagerstoemia Crape Myrtle 3' 20' 24" Indica 'Tuscarora' Hybrid -Pink O C Box Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic Bolls report shall be furnished to the Clty Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill Boll amendments, as determined by the Clty Inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only Intersection Ilne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for all project Intersections, Including driveways Local residential street Intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required • 9 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM~2006 Res 8 Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00034 StdCond 4-26 doc }3--~0 I / / _/-~. / / Project No DRC2005-00034 ComoleUOn Date M. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall _/_/_• be submitted to the Clty Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Archibald Avenue and Hillside Road 2 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting ~_/_ Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 3 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the ~_/_ developer until accepted by the City N. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map ~_/_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adjacent areas O. Uti lities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_J- electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required as necessa t l t t f J / 2 ry ing u i i ies exis The developer shall be responsible for the relocation o - _ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them P. Ge neral Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the CIry, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/~_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 10 • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res 8 SN Rpt\DRC2005-00034 StdCond 4-26 doc /3~-IOa Proieci No DRC2005-00034 Comoletion Date 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if • at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q. Security Hardware A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices R. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner S. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibihty PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ti I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00034 StdCond 4-26 doc / / / / / / ~-/- /3--~ 03 w~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection - District -- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS January 31, 2006 The Enclave II by Totl Brothers, Inc (11) SFR Tract DRC2005-00034 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelmes for the spaang and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fve hydrants msingle-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall faang the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The regwred fire flow for this protect is 2,250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. \J g-y OU 3 Firewater plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are • approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1. Specifications for private Fire Distract access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet d The minimum radius for cut-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any prvate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on • each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) t Trees and shrubs planted adtacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 2. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable Devices shall be installed m accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and speafications b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire Distract Knox Key Switch c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adtacent to the gate for use • in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fads to operate. 2 ~-I OS d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset . 3 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 4 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes regwre approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will revew all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. • • 3 /~-~ D~ Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 3. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER • The bwldmg construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other required documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways. 3 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwetlmgs shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 4 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and • multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness 4 ~}-y07 When the budding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks in multi-tenant commeraal and industrial buildings The suite designation • numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites • ~'}--~ ~g T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE. April 26, 2006 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Jennifer Fechner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT• CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-01096 - VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to construct a 60-foot monopine cellular tower in the Hillside Residential District, located at City Fire Station #175, at 11108 Banyan Street - APN. 0201-191-28. This protect is categorically exempt from the regwrement of the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA gwdelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION• A Surroundino Land Use and Zoning. North - Flood Control South - Single-Faintly Dwelling Units/Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Flood Control West - Single-Faintly Dwelling Units/Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) B General Plan Designations. Protect Srte - Ciwc/Regional Public Factldies North - Flood ControWtility Corndor South - Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Flood Control/Utility Corndor West - Very Low Residential (Less than 2 dwelling units per acre) C Site Characteristics• The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and Venzon Wireless have been working together to improve data transmission to fire trucks responding to calls, particularly in the northern portions of the City The applicant is proposing to construct a 60-foot monopine, consisting of 12 antenna panels and one parabolic antenna for the purpose of enhanang cellular communication service for the fire station and fire vehicles en route to locations in the area In addition to enhanced sennce to the Fire Distract, the proposed facility will enhance cell phone service for Verizon • customers in the area The protect site is located at Fire Station #175 on Banyan Street, east of Haven Avenue, on the northeast quadrant of the station, behind the garage Item B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-01096 - VERIZON WIRELESS April 26, 2006 Page 2 building The monopme will be approximately 300 feet north of the curb face of Banyan Street, near the easterly edge of the fire station To the east of the fire station is vacant land The antennas will be mounted on the monopme at 50-feet above the grade. Artifiaal branches to resemble a Pine tree will be installed and the cylindrical monopme will be embellished with a rubberized faux bark material made to imitate a tree trunk, thereby, providing a "stealth° design ANALYSIS' A. General. The wireless communication facility is classified as a Mafor Wireless Communication Facility because of its location on public land Mator Wireless Communication Facilities are not permitted to be located within 300 feet of any residential structure or within 300 feet of any existing major wireless communication faality, except when co-located on the same wireless faality. The proposed wireless communication facility will be 300 feet from the nearest residential structure and is not within 300 feet of any existing wireless communication facility In addition, the proposed monopme will have space for co-location opportunities in the future The proposed equipment will be sheltered by a 6-foot high CMU wall to match the existing perimeter block wall of the fire station. The proposed Verizon facility meets the screening and site selection gwdelines for wireless communication facilities by providing stealth type design and evaluating three other locations which ultimately did not prove feasible • B Design Review Committee• The Committee (Stewart, McPhail, and Coleman) reviewed • the project on March 14, 2006, and recommended approval C. Grading Committee. The project was reviewed by the Grading Committee on March 14, 2006. The Committee did not identify any grading issues and recommended approval. D. Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on March 14, 2006, and recommended approval. E Environmental Assessment The Planning Department Staff has determined that the 4 project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The protect qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities because in addition to an existing structure that will not result in an increase of more than 50 percent of the floor area of the structure before the addition. In addition there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. NEIGHBORHOOD NOTIFICATION: The City Planner sent an informational letter and a photo simulation of the proposed wireless faality on January 23, 2006, to all property owners within 300 feet of the proposed wireless facility. The residents were encouraged to contact the Planning Department to review the plans and/or ask questions The Planning staff received one phone call from a resident who had general questions about the proposed wireless facility Phone calls placed to the resident were never returned ~-~. LJ • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-01096 - VERIZON WIRELESS April 26, 2006 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planrnng Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-01096 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with ennriifinnc DC:JFIma Attachments. Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Topographic Survey Exhibit C -Photo Simulation Exhibit D -Site Plan Exhibit E -Elevations Exhibit F -Design Review Comments and March 14, 2006 Draft Resolution of Approval DRC2005-01096 Action Comments dated for Conditional Use Permit ~, 3 Dan Coleman Acting City Planner 8 a K aE f. •.1 8 ~ g a ~ g e - ,c ~ 3ea: ~ ~ y a a- ~ ep ~ ~ ~t , ~~~Ri ~D G S Y ~xhib~ ~" -~ `~ _ __ 7 i~qq ~ ~_-~ !i ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 a! ~u ~s~ilY`~~ I I ' ~ ~ 1 i ~ [ f e _ _ !1 1 ~ L ! ~ -~- ~ ~ a ~ ai 6 ~ ~~d~~li$ ~~ Eo ~ ~ o P _ U Y W ~ ~ - + + a+ r+ I I p s I ¢ ~ i : _ "~ ! ca ~ ~ , .~~.:~. f 1 i i ' f ~ ~ ` , ob e U ' ' ~ O N ~ 0 ~C5 F 1~ Eg 0 f_l Ei rn 9 J -1 - ~ VI '~ 1 ' `^~ • 1s ~ a N ~' f ~3~ U f ~ 3 ~ a i ~ pp,,ff g ` t 6! ~ 3 LL ~ ~ ~> a~'~ ~ ~ ~~g~ ~ iE~ ~ _ ~o~ ~ o d 7 ~ ~ ~ @ @ O 8 4 _ d it = ~ V ¢ lel q S cy 3 g $ p 6 a l a ~ ~ ~~~ E r l ¢ ~? a _ i°f d4 ~ r gE J x ~~~ f vmntirc p Iii . o ° i 1 F 5 j~ __________`_ 1 ,; { _ .F °~ f~ E IFS i i ..nl~i ~Iyf 1 '\ '~ i ~~„~a3 I i I~ i1/le..l ~'IF V b J~aNY~ I 5 Ii~f F ~' p ~ ~, •~ ~ ~, + it p ~ ~ I~ o X54 55i5P5i~ '°\ ~' lit IIB.,.-0m a,~~ 5 ~, ~\ .\ ,, -L"'"------- _ _ I ~~ 1 . y _ f iF y 5vp i ~~~~i»YYY . s i 3 I ~ e '; ~ `. `.. \ ~\ \\ ` ~ ~` :. ~ I i e t i I . P I i d .. .• I _____________ yr________________ I / I F I' _ - ~;~' 16 . ~ _ i ~ ;f I Y 0 i ~ i € a E i s°,s s s ! ~ Fi F g ~' # ~ !~ 5 t ` c 5~ ii c E s as " i! cgs ~ A9 r t' E~ i n w ai „ , ~ 71 °O ~: ~. uy :IP Y~~+f CJJ ~.F o°I ~ A E '"'t~ t H n` 5 ~X~ 1 ~- ~U~v~\ er/iL/n-wireless ~i~`f OF RAP DE( (~ECE1Vl 6` • __ _ _ CHAFFEY -FIRE STATION VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM THE FIRE STATION RECREATION AREA EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR Il p PREPARED BY A-y~7 p 7 7~,~y~' p.A~t~L1~1~11Z{~ 1~. (() US(TR I I l I bbl \"e ~ CHARLES STECKLY i~< n a P o u~ i i u """"""' ' •""" " • """"" ~~ ~...u.... .n. .. .. . ARCHITECTURE INC CSAi@sbcglobal net • X N ~_ Cs- ', fi. •J /. ver~Lonwire~ess FOR iHl AL.~.NP~1~N -, ~co~sorii~~~ I\t tl It l'U II\IIU ~.wu~, main iu~, ~~~iun,naii _ CHAFFEY -FIRE STATION VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM THE FIRE STATION RECREATION AREA PREPARED BY CHARLES STECKLY ARCHITECTURE INC CSAi@sbcglohal net • PROPOSED CONDITIONS • PROPOSED VERIZON MONOPINE AND EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE nX ~ S~ =wer~Z,,onwireless _ ~ CHAFFEY -FIRE STATION VIEW LOOKING EASTFROM THE CLOSEST RESIDENTIAL USES EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR I PREPARED BY p p ~y~T,,T ~ry,q ~S.,CS I 'L 1'N~~Jry _ ISORIIUT'I `~j CHARLES STECICLY ((~T` ~~ i U ~i p t~ R~ ~, n ARCHITECTURE INC • . , ..~., .n ,~ ~ ~ ~ u ~a ,~ ` CSAi@sbcglobal net um•u ~ , , a~ , , • • ~ X) S ~_ -1`- • • ver~Lonwirel@SS CHAFFEY -FIRE STATION ~~ VIEW LOOKING FAST FROM THE CLOSEST RESIDENTIAL USES FOR IIII ~LANNIN~`' <,OPdShRIIIIYi ~! I ~I O¢rnn~ill~ ,i i~ ~ i eve ~.n un~a ~nni i.n ~~n PREPARCD SY CHARLES STECKLY ARCHITECTURE INC CSAi@sbcglobal nec u PROPOSED CONDITIONS -PROPOSED VER120N MONOPINE n (T~ ~- ~veriLonwireless EXISTING CONDfTIONS _,_, CHAFFEY -FIRE STATION VIEW LOOKING NORTHWEST FROMADJACENT DRAINAGE AREA FOR I I ~~ PREPARED BY ~r~r~1~r~~ ~ ~ . ~~ L(ONtiOk17U\t ~~ CHARLES STECKLY i~~ci r.rnr,~iiu ARCHITECTURE INC '~~~~~,~~'~`~~~„'~~~~~~ ~",i~~~'„'„ CSAi@sbcglobal net ~ • ~x -V@ ~ wireless ~' FOR I I II ~.~LAI®11~III~1~~' C()iVtiC)RIIUAI M I~t unr~u,u i n i ~u~~~w~ni .,ia ~.: ~.uu~~~ i _ CHAFFEY-FIRE STATION VIEW LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM ADJACENT DRAINAGE AREA PREPARED BY CHARLES STECKLY ARCHITECTURE INC CSAv@sbcglobal nec CJ PROPOSED CONDITIONS -PROPOSED VERIZON MONOPINE d ct • /verl~gn~R~2~ 1~1615WY W1d R~ ~vM_ u eN~e~ R~oa Mul'+s-~ooo CHAFFEY ~~ nice B/xlw Sf RulOq OXwpNM U Nn RRt ®R Pl~fl yuW RN pc YIC YRwtt YS iA M/S /b MI u!R OF 5 ~~- t • 1 t • i • `§ 6 ' a~ ~; 7 ~ S3 yg~~ 5 ~- R 99 ~{pp Y ~6~p ~ ~ ~pSL ! ~ ~ ~ a ~ 5 ~ ~~ iX ~(f $~ia'16 ~ ~~~~ ~ r ~ 9R $~ Y y a ~;t , ~~~RnSa p C ~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 10 p m Jennifer Fechner March 14, 2006 • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-01096 - VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to construct a 60-foot monopme cellular tower in the Hillside Residential Distract, located at City Fire Station #5, 11108 Banyan Street - APN 0201-191-28 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) Design Parameters The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Venzon have been working together to improve data transmission to fire trucks responding to calls, particularly, in the northern portions of the city The applicant is proposing to construct a 60-foot monopme, consisting of 12 antenna panels and one parabolic antenna for the purposes of enhanang cellular communication service for the fire station and fire vehicles en route to locations in the area The protect site is located at Fire Station #5 on Banyan Street, east of Haven Avenue, on the northeast quadrant of the station, behind the garage building The monopme will be approximately 300 feet north of the curb face of Banyan Street, near the easterly edge of fire station To the east of fire station is vacant land The antennas will be mounted on the monopme at 50 feet above the grade Artifiaal branches to resemble a pine tree will be installed and the cylindrical monopme will be embellished with a rubberized faux bark material made to imitate a tree trunk, thereby providing a "stealth" design The wireless communication facility is classified as a mator wireless communication faality because of its location on public land Mator wireless communication facilities are not permitted to be located within 300 feet of any residential structure or within 300 feet of any existing mator wireless communication facility, except when co-located on the same wireless facility The proposed wireless communication faality will be 300 feet from the nearest residential structure and is not within 300 feet of any existing wireless communication facility In addition, the proposed monopme will have space for co-location opportunities in the future The proposed equipment will be sheltered by a 6-foot high CMU wall to match the existing perimeter block wall of the fire station The proposed Venzon faality meets the screening and site selection guidelines for wireless communication faalities by providing stealth type design and evaluating three other locations that ultimately did not prove feasible Staff Comments The following comments are intended to prowde an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect There are no Mayor Issues Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Jennifer Fechner The Committee recommended approval of the protect as presented • ~-I . RESOLUTION NO 06-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-01096 FOR A W IRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY CONSISTING OF A 60-FOOT HIGH MONOPINE CELLULAR TOWER IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT CITY FIRE STATION #175; AT 11108 BANYAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 0201-191-28 A. Rentals. 1. Venzon Wireless filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-01096, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subfect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically fords that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 26, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the north side of Beryl Street, east of Fredericksburg Avenue, and west of Milliken Avenue, with a total street frontage of approximately 355 feet on Beryl Street, which is presently fully improved with City Fire Station #175, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is zoned Flood Control and is undeveloped, the property to the south is zoned Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single-family dwelling units, the property to the east is zoned Flood Control and is undeveloped, the property to the west is zoned Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single-family dwelling units; and c The application proposes a 60-foot monopme, consisting of 12 antenna panels and one parabolic antenna with artificial branches to resemble a Pine tree and rubberized faux bark material made to imitate a tree trunk, thereby, providing a stealth design that blends with the built environment and meets the goals and obfectives of the Development Code The antennas will be • mounted on the monopme at 50 feet above the grade; and d. The monopme will be approximately 300 feet north of the curb face of Banyan ~j -~ S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-43 DRC2005-01096 - VERIZON WIRELESS April 26, 2006 Page 2 Street, near the easterly edge of the fire station. The proposed wueless communication faality will be 300 feet from the nearest residential structure and is not within 300 feet of any existing wireless communication faality In addition, the proposed monopme will have space for co-location opportunities m the future; and e. The proposed wireless facility wdl be of sufficient height to allow for future co-location of an additional wireless faality, thereby, meeting the goals and objectives of the development by providing opportunities for co-location and the placement of multiple wireless carriers on a single-pole structure. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby fords and concludes as follows• a. The proposed use is m accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district m which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements m the vianity, and • c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. . 4. The Planning Staff has determined that the protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Gwdelmes The project qualifies under the class 1 exemption under State CEQA Gwdelmes Section 1 Existing Facilities because in addition to an existing structure that will not result in an increase of more than 50 percent of the floor area of the structure before the addition In addition there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of a 60-foot monopme, consisting of 12 antenna panels and one parabolic antenna for the purpose of enhancing wireless communication service. The antennas shall be installed on a cylinder that will be covered with faux bark and branch material to imitate a Pine tree. The color of the parabolic antenna and all appurtenant supporting brackets and attachments shall be painted to match the branches of the monopme. 2) The wireless communication facility and the equipmentshelter shall be • constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file with the Planning Department C3-( ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-43 DRC2005-01096 - VERIZON WIRELESS April 26, 2006 • Page 3 3) Any expansion, modification, or alternation to the monopme shall regwre review and approval by the Planning Department. 4) The equipment shelter, landscaping, and concrete masonry wall shall match the existing egwpment shelter, landscaping, and concrete masonry wall for the existing fire station. 5) All egwpment necessary for the operation of the wireless facility shall be contained inside the equipment shelter 6) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 7) Signs are not permitted on the monopme and the egwpment shelter, except signage regwred for emergency notification purposes and regwred by regulatory agencies. 8) The antenna and the egwpment shelter shall be maintained in good condition at all times. Damaged and/or weathered egwpment, including appurtenant egwpment, shall be repaired promptly. 9) No wireless communication facility shall interfere with the public safety • radio communications system, including, but not limited to, the 800 MHz trunking system. If such a facility is found to interfere with the public safety radio system, it shall cease operations immediately until such time as the problem is resolved to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10) Except for necessary emergency maintenance, maintenance of the wireless communication faality and all appurtenant equipment on any day, excepting Sundays, shall occur only between the hours of 8 00 a.m. and 8 00 p m On Sundays, maintenance shall occur only between the hours of 9.00 a m. and 8:00 p m Enoineenng Department 1) The enclosure must match any adtacent architectural features (same type, finish, color, etc ) 2) No temporary operation of the cell site is permitted pnor to final approval from the Building and Safety Department 3) Facilities section is concerned that there maybe interference with the approach/departure angle for the helipad. Venzon must incorporate design and approval from Caltrans regarding obstruction, lighting, approach/departure angle analysis, etc into submittal • 4) The submitted plan shows existing Telecommunications and Electncity as Point of Connections. Venzon must separately serve and meter the proposed tower ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-43 DRC2005-01096 - VERIZON WIRELESS April 26, 2006 Page 4 5) The Plan shall reference regwred wind calculations for tower as this area receives significant wind loading. 6) There can be no disruption of any service (power, phone, water, fuel delivery, etc) related to the tower install as this is an essential facility. Tests should be conducted to determine possible frequencydisruption to 800 MHz radio system as well as any other radio systems on site. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Coleman, Acting Secretary • C~ J I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 26th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES' COMMISSIONERS. NOES' COMMISSIONERS ABSENT• COMMISSIONERS I-.~ p~ -~ g COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2005-01096 SUBJECT: 60-FOOT MONOPINE APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS LOCATION: CITY FIRE STATION #175, AT 11108 BAYAN STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: •A. General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-43, Standard Conditions, and all envvonmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved m the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Rewew approval shall expire if bwldrng permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained m accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on fde m the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations. • Completion Date ~~ ~~ ~-/- / / ~~~ Prgect No DRC2005-01096_ Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/~ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner- 3 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/ /~ submitted for City Planner revew and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance 6 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/~- located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. D. Landscaping 1- A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ~ /_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) • E. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following. _--/-J- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan; d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, waterand waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Protect Number (DRC2005-01096) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to ~~ the City pnor to permit issuance. . 2 ~ ao Project No DRC2005-01096_ Comoletion Date L J F r 1 L._J G. H. • 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls ~ /_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the ~_/_ Building and Safety Department 6 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal regwrements Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be ~~_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bwlding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commeraal or industrial development protect or ~~ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwlding and Safety Offiaal after tract/parcel map ~~_ recordation and prior to issuance of buldng permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p.m and 6 30 a.m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public ~_/_ counter) New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~~ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations ~_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC ~~_ Section 1505 4 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ___/~ 5 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed ~ /_ Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Califomia Bwlding Code, City Grading ~_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/~_ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~~_ time of application for grading plan check. 3 ~, a t Project No DRC2005-01096_ Completion Date The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for ~~ existing bwldtngs where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and ftll. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer • • ~_ s T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONCA Staff Report DATE April 26, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01173 -JACK HALL - A request to convert an existing historic home Into an office on 1 4 gross acre of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6710 Beryl Street - APN 0202-461-65 This protect is categorically exempt from the requrements of the Caiifornla Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 Exemption - In-Fill Development Protect) BACKGROUND The Stoebe House was constructed in 1895 by J P Cutler and his wife Mr Cutler, who was a stone mason, bwlt the stone cooler and fireplaces himself The ranch was sold to George M Braxton in 1908, which he owned until 1912, when it was sold to Charles Stoebe The Stoebe family were active citrus ranchers that were Involved in the community The home is gwte urnque because of the Queen Anne style architecture with detailed wood siding, unique carved gable peaks, and a small front porch which wraps around the north side of the home The house was designated a Historic Landmark on August 15, 1984 The house has since been owned by several families and throughout the years has been a rental property before Jack Hall had acgwred the property and surrounding acreage Mator exterior and interior renovations have been underway since 2001 Mr Hall has continued with his remodel for an office, unfortunately, with no permits An existing parking lot was constructed for the office use, however, the layout of the parking area never received entitlement from the City In the past 10 years, the Stoebe House has had mator modifications The owner, Jack Hall has completed re-facing, painting, window replacement, front porch, and access requirements For over 5 years, the historic home has been utilized as an office and contractor's yard for Western States Development, a construction company owned by Jack Hall The City's Code Enforcement and Building and Safety/Fire Departments have all given Mr Hall correction notices One of the main issues with the Fire Department review was the regwrement for an accessible staircase The applicant has since submitted a revised rear elevation which includes a large stairway, accessible in case of an emergency In the past 18 months, the owner has made a valiant effort to "clean up" the property and outstanding violations ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01173 -JACK HALL April 26, 2006 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION In November 2004, the owner filed a Conditional Use Permit application to convert the property to a low intensity office use Once the application was submitted, the Code Enforcement, Building and Safety, Planning, and Fire Departments inspected the premises Since the submittal from the owner for the Conditional Use Permit, the Planning, Fire, and Building and Safety Departments have been working to resolve the outstanding Code violations City staff compiled all Code violations into a Correction Notice which was issued to the owner, and the City subsequently initiated a Code Enforcement action m court If all of the terms of the Conditional Use Permit are satisfied, the issues in the pending Code Enforcement action most likely will be moot A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North -Single-Family Homes, Medium Residential (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) South -Single-Family Homes, Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) East -Church, Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) West -Single-Family Homes, Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) B General Plan Designations Project Site -Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) North - Medum Residential (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) South -Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) East -Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) West -Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) C Site Characteristics The site and surrounding vacant property has recently been cleared of storage containers, recreation vehicles, scrap lumber, metal trash bins, storage egwpment, etc A parking area has been constructed on the south side of the existing home The surrounding property, owned by Jack Hall, is currently vacant with temporary construction fencing for future development D Parkin The interior of the building is a total of 2,466 square feet The applicant will provide a total of 10 parking spaces regwred for the office use ANALYSIS A General The applicant is proposing at this time only the use of the historic home as a "low intensity office use " This will include all existing bedroom space to be used as office space, with one restroom on the upper level and one on the lower level The office use is for the owner's development company, Western States Development The company employs approximately 7 people at the Stoebe House The parking paving and striping were completed without permits and are now proposed as permanent parking area for employees Anew parking lot layout has been submitted, which includes gated access, wrought iron fencing, and landscaping to help screen the parking from public view According to the owner, the master plan of the adjacent vacant property (shown in Exhibit A) will be developed as single-family homes in the future, however, the proposed homes have not been formally submitted to the Planning~Department as an application CZ' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01173 -JACK HALL April 26, 2006 Page 3 B Design Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) on February 28, 2006 The protect was recommended for approval subtect to minor revisions recommended C Environmental Assessment This protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 Exemption - In-Fill Development Protect) CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01173 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and Standard Conddions DC EC\ma Attachments Exhibit A -Site Plan Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Draft Re: r1 LJ - Floor Plan - Elevations - Design Review Action Comments dated February 28, 2006 - Code EnforcemenUFire/Building Department Original Violations dated December 12, 2004 - Applicants Request for Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Photos of the Stoebe House olution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01178 C3 Acting City Planner x! r s p q a F: a a o. ° FQe lxe a3.e~ 'x@ ix i x !. 3r ~5~ 1~ e a ~; G} ~. a =a ~ s a~ 4 ~s ~~ Fti- -°s~M: ~P +i~>i i~ ( .... a g ~_ P e gFFti: i e• }9 y F_ of '~~ ~ d tl i ddz s 6 p e 4 i:f 4 si di ef'x x.is::•+i~ee e~i 3~3 dx i'x ~ g ~ ~e agi ~id7 BB ~i e a ~ tlEd?d ~oa'~ ~E ~Fi tYg9qayy7 1( ~~~35P,~, c7 Fe fn - f H ~9 gggyy °~i i E ~~ ~ d~p dt;~E"e 'Es 3~9733~~igi aSiq~aF~ ~y -~ E y~+ x p~ ~~ c °d •- 33~ d s ]'x p~ 7gl de3p- 5 ~ ip eZY I ! Y} - &f ~ ~ tl~:~d FyPyaS xl~E ~ ~3- ~ i F€e a~~'ii ~~ ~ii i:g~a~p^~p~t Pe ~SI~eE~~d e~ ~a 6' 4~ O ' 2 7 tld 1. ~ dt @ 93 S c gEl F~ ai%~'59FP B ~pe Fa ..°gx et .¢ ` ~ F ~ x i a 1 ~; ~d:p pa iP i. ~ ~4 3 li• rid .a° 1 ¢ yy~e' d="x9 Y. Os! ,~ {•r ~o' ( ~:-Z• iii dF i9- @3 9 9 . ~d 1 :=P:3y Pe9Pi a3 33-7 ~E°S a i' N a F] i F ~ . 5 e y 7~1 d a4 ~iCt~F£1•~(. N:~ ~g e.i~3 m t~ CO •~.~ ~a Fe i- ~ Yi ~ e $~. 9 P a ~ FI Q~~3 ia']i i1.6 ~1 e~ ~N ~ •~". - yb ~ a ~ ~~ ig-e.a ~ 99l~a $C~~ ~rx.~(ye~~~diSe7 7~~~~ plsje'F~`i~ i3' ~?~°.;a.9;3 ~'~'- a y„ +' ~ a9 ~9 °F9 i i i 9 t P~. F F !x 5 pk e E' ~ h w' ~~ 1€~s ~e~~g~nei~ ~363~~~+i~€f~~6~~4i :$g3~~~liz~4dsf~4~i9~~~tl~i1~i~~~~~$i~ESdi ~ - ~ ~ ~' ' d ~ ' i '-~ e9e; I 5 3 ~ e! iy fg;x 9v €Qaf ip I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~i~B=Ei"yEy .d~ \ is ~ ~flyplS[`}~d ii^~pp f ti9~ig.gei;4js3 ~ ° ~[iF:f~xie3~'~e pj paageF}6de'a€ I BgiYlj~fyii3i ~geogq __-___-_-_~__-~d- R - ~Y - icv~a-___-_ -__ ~ 3iii~ii?4F~9w.~15p i~ II ! ~~~ I I } ~ i~ , ii~;!(lit i - f ~~ li IiaBEi h I I F ~ I! ~ I I `~ ~ I ~ ~€FR~ i is ~''' • N ~ tOd \ aA ai'i ~` \ \ ~ I ~ ~ I I E ~ ----- ----~---j ~ ~ - ~. a ~- ., ~~ If _ ,; . , ~ S~'I%~ E i ~IIlI ~ ~ ;,~. _ ;~. ~~ N I r='- h I Y ~I ~„ f _ 3 m F~cl~-db-~ Cy 0 '~ Wo I ~~ Qf N ~~ O Qc O~ x ~ w ~, zQ a~ g 9 +I I pp: F? ~ ~ [ r ' i ~ ' -- I a ib~t ~~ uv XT <§ rc~ oa a z Nn X, S ' pdi 3~ 2F 6~ i° G '3.~pQEf~f9~a1 9 °3 5 ~ ~~Q ~F f? ~q ~e ~~ ( i :i ' ~.4°~ ~' b•~~~ :d as 3 p - e s "f •~ ~~;c 8f ~`f fcge 93 si5 5p] 4e i`g'e 3 p~ x " 4Q tY 3Qi'?46fQ9?id p59 . ff?~~ EF~F?'y7gyjv9g5~n ~ 74*9 fc I3Yi ). 3 :339?? 9 ePt:~ n: 4 1 e y; } 47alif e ] F~i' 6 •f YA(~~i: f~ a P 599C! E f° i~@@ j i ~a9E ? f~f ~ ~~ ~'x9E-ef~ ,f;f : z E~€ QgiC;~~~e p~~i G } ?] ~ .: • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 50 p m. Emily Cameron February 28, 2006 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01173 -JACK HALL - A request to convert an existing historic home into an office on 1 4 gross acre of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6710 Beryl Street - APN: 0202-461-65 This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 Exemption -- In-Fill Development Protect). Design Parameters/ Background. The site is located on the southwest corner of Beryl Street and 19th Street The historic home located on-site was built in 1895. The residence consists of 2,466 square feet. There is currently no garage on-site. The residence is currently being used as an office, with access to an asphalt parking area which runs parallel to Beryl Street, and can be seen from the street. The parking area was constructed with no permits. The City's Code Enforcement Department has been working with the owner for the past 5 years to clear violations, including storage of RVs and other construction vehicles, stockpile, lumber, and debris on-site. In the last 36 months, the owner has been actroely eradicating the exterior violations. Since 2001, the house was in need of serious interior and exterior remodeling. The owner, Jack Hall, has been working on the restoration of the home for many years. In adddion to the • restoration, construction, grading, and paving of the current parking area has been completed without proper permits. In November 2004, after numerous encounters with Code Enforcement, Building Safety and other City staff, the owner submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit to request a "low intensity" office use. Because the property has been designated a Historic Landmark by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Landmark Alteration Permit application must also be processed in contunction with the Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit. The Fire Department has regwred a new access to the second-story of the home because the interior stairway does not meet current Fire Code regwrements for the new occupancy load for office use The proposed stairway will be constructed of wood and will wrap from the south elevation around to the rear elevation of the home and incorporate an entry at the top of the second story for access Together with staff, the applicant has provided revisions to the site layout of the parking lot and surrounding landscaping. At this time, no additional revisions to the elevations are proposed. Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion , Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect. 1 The applicant has been working with staff to revise plans and meet Code requirements. Currently, the applicant has been working with the Fire Department to incorporate the new exterior stauway for access The stairway must meet all Fire Code regwrements prior to the Planning Commission hearing Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: ~h~b~~~~ C~ DRC AGENDA DRC2004-01 1 73 -JACK HALL February 28, 2006 Page 2 Landscaping should be provided, within a mirnmum 5-foot planter strip, around the parking lot. Broad canopy trees should be provided to shade the parking lot, at a rate of 1 tree per three parking stalls, with the goal of shading at least 50 percent of pavement area. 3. Landscaping should be provided, including trees and shrubs, on all sides of the house, plus street trees within parkways. 4. All walls facing public view should be decorative in nature and provide architectural style to match the historic home. Staff recommends a natural aver rock theme to match to elements of the home. 5. All chain link fencing should be replaced with wrought iron fencing to match the existing wrought iron gate of the entry of the parking area. Policv Issues• The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion: 1. All parking shall be double-striped per City standards Permanent landscaped areas with tree wells, concrete curbs, and wheel stops are regwred. 2 The trash enclosure shall be built to City standards including aroll-up door and an • overhead feature, such as a fabric mesh, to keep debris from blowing out. The trash enclosure elevations shall match the historic nature of the property. 3. Additional trees and shrubs shall be provided along the parking area to screen vehicles from public view (and provide shading). Provide 15-gallon trees and 5-gallon shrubs to match the historic landscape palette of the property. Staff Recommendation• Staff recommends approval with the changes noted in the comments above. Design Review Committee Action Staff Planner Emily Cameron Members Present: C~ INSPECTION -12/12/05 /+ ~ /1 ~ ~ j_ i~ ~ Code t Case #: COD2003-03028 • APN. 0202-461- 65 ~ ( - 2j Location: 6710 Bery I l Street T Request Date: 01/15/03 Officer: Rowlen R.C.M.C. 2.24.110A 1) A special use permit is required for any change of use to a structure on a landmark site. R.C.M.C. 2.24.1206 1) A landmark alteration permit is required for any material change on a designated landmark site. R.C.M.C. 5.04.030A 1) Business activity conducted or located within city limits requires a City Business License. R.C.M.C. 8.17.090A 1) All trash containers and/or dumpsters must be enclosed or removed from view unless out for pick up. R.C M.C. 8.23.0506.3 1) All broken windows must be replaced/repaired. R C.M.C. 8.23.050C.3 1) Exposed, rear yard area requires a form of legal • landscape (unless landscape requirements are met and carried out through a granted Conditional Use Permit). 2) Parkway area along 19"' Street requires a form of legal landscape (unless landscape requirements are met and carried out through a granted Conditional Use Permit). R.C M.C. 8.23.050E 1) All storage, equipment, and materials located to the rear/side yard, i.e. southwest corner of the property, must be removed or enclosed out of public wew R.C M.C. 8.23 050E 1) All storage, equipment, and materials located to the rear/side yard, i.e. southwest corner of the property, must be removed or enclosed out of public view. R C.M.C. 17 04.030C.1 1) Cease occupancy/use and remove or submit for approval a Conditional Use Permit application for . the secondary dwelling unit(s), i.e. the Layton recreational vehicle(s) located to the rear of the property. ~xh~b~+E C ~l INSPECTION -12/12/05 Case #: COD2003-03028 APN. 0202-461-65 _ Location: 6710 Beryl Street . Request Date: 01/15/03 Officer Rowlen Contd. R.C.M.C. 17.08.0706.1 1) 'Fence must be maintained in good condition ('legal screening for fencing is as follows: fence, wall, hedge, berm, or similar architectural or landscape feature -green tarp/netting Is prohibited). 2) All broken windows must be replaced/repaired. R.C.M.C. 17 08 0706 2 1) Remove or enclose from wew all scrap lumber, sunk, trash and debns located to the rear/side yard, i.e. southwest corner of the property. R.C.M.C. 17.08.0708 3 1) Remove or enclose from view all discarded, or unused obiects, equipment, parts, containers, construction egwpment or similar items located to the rear/side yard, i e. southwest corner of the property. R.C.M.C 17.08.0708.5 1) Remove all torn and tattered tarp(s). • R.C M.C. 17.08.0706.6 1) Exposed, rear yard area requires a form of legal landscape (unless landscape requirements are met and carved out through a granted Conditional Use Permit). 2) Parkway area along 19"' Street regwres a form of legal landscape (unless landscape requirements are met and carved out through a granted Conditional Use Permit). R.C.M.C 17 08.070C.3 1) All vehicles, travel trailers, etc. must be parked on an improved surface (if related to business activity certain cntena apply based upon an approved Conditional Use Permit). Ci~~ INSPECTION - 12/12/05 • Case #: COD2003-03028 • APN: 0202-461-65 Location: 6710 Beryl Street Request Date 01/15/03 Officer: Rowlen Contd. R C.M.C. 17 08.070C 4 1) All vehicles and trailers parked or stored in the rear/side of the property must be screened or removed (if related to business activity certain criteria apply based upon an approved Conditional Use Permit) (see 8.23.060E (2) for legal screening definition). R.C.M.C. 17 08 070F.3.a 1) The Layton travel trailer, unknown license plate number, must be removed or stored out of public wew. R.C.M.C 19 08.050A 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be obtained from the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Department for the (removal and) replacement of the Heritage Eucalyptus Trees removed from the property. • e~i 3 Correction list from Building & Safety r ~" ~' Z 12-13-05 • The lists of corrections are not inclusive Additional requirements may surface as reconstruction for the change of occupancy develops The list below constitutes to different conditions. These conditions are for a residential situation or a commeraal situation. The CUP for change of occupancy would necessitate a commercial approach, whereas the residential code would apply if the CUP were withdrawn. Residential: 1. Romex at security lighting to be located inside the building. Romex is not allowed to be used in an exposed location. 2. Remove electrical stub outs in rear yard. 3. Interior walls have been added, moved from original and removed. Provide plans to show original and new walls, which exist. Prowde a detailed framing and floor plan. Destructive testing for inspection may be necessary. 4. Provide adequate weather protection at roof over rock room. 5 Complete drywall at attic room. 6. Provide verification to show that glass is tempered at attic room 7. Prowde GFCI in all receptacles in restrooms, kitchen and wet bar areas. . 9 Smoke detectors shall be located in each sleeping room & hallway or area giving access to a sleeping room, and on each story and basement for dwellings with more than one story. Because this is a historic structure smoke detectors may be battery operated, and installed in location as specified above. 10. Landing at a door shall have a length measured in the direction of travel of no less than 36". The rear door must open over a landing not more than 1" below the threshold. If the door does not swing over the landing, the landing shall be not more than 8" below the threshold. 11. An additional water heater was added. It appeared that they shared a gas line. Supply separate and adequate gas lines for each water heater and obtain a permit for the newly installed water heater. The water heater(s) must be strapped to prevent horizontal displacement. 12 Electrical panel to be labeled. Commercial: Handicapped parking exceeds 2% slope at current time. Plans have been submitted to move handicapped parking Handicapped parking requirements can be checked at that time. • C12 • 2. Electrical service is currently a residential use. Provide requirements from Edison as to whether a residential service will be allowed, or a commercial service wdl be required. ' 3. A handicap accessible sidewalk and ramp are required for access to the budding. 4. A second staircase is required for egress from the second floor. 5 The threshold to the front and rear door shall not be more than'/z° in height to meet handicapped requirements. 6. All door handles shall be level type. 7 A handicapped accessible bathroom shall be provided on the fast floor. S. Provide structural engineers analysis of the rock structure to the rear of the house. The room does not appear to be structurally sound. 9. Regwred doorways shall have a regwred opening width of 32" clear when the door is at a 90-degree angle. 10. A clear path of 44" is required in the kitchen. 11. Accessible signage is regwred on entrance to the site, entrance to the building, and bathroom. 12 .Todet room floors shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface such as Portland cement, ceramic tde or other approved material that extends upward onto the walls at least 5 inches 13 .Todet rooms shall be provided with a fully operable exterior window with an area not less than 3 square feet or a vertical duct not less • than 100 square inches in area for the first water closet plus 50 square inches additional of area for each additional water closet, or a mechanically operated exhaust system capable of providing a complete change of air every 15 minutes. Such mechanically operated exhaust system shall be connected directly to the outside, and the point of discharge shall be at least 3 feet from any opening that allows air entry into occupied portions of the budding 14. In addition to the previous corrections, please include from the correction list above, #1-7,11. • C~3 ~irc Can~st-~-cflo-r> ~ p~ ~~~~ '~/ _ ,~ _ , D l ~'/V/~C. L(~~ .~~Y~ / UjfiiL~~ '/L~G ivi %i}Y~ ~~G~~~/C.~.S~. Q ~//7C.E ~ ~ ~ co ~: ~l-~.~ ~£~~v7»c.• ~~1~-~ ~cC-~c.~~ ~ ' .>,~~"5 ,~,Cfa%ftZ~ - /G ~ ,~9~~Cc~S rcG G~~ j3e%'S ~/~-C=am ~ AT L~~~~ /,3 0~ Cam!/~~~iL~ 1.~1 ~~~ ~/~ Y/ti'C rU ~C ~l~`C~/~T7Csn~y' f~C-T/U..¢7zr~ fff~~oC J~~,ci6~T / C7/ ~ sued 7Nz`'~ ~ ~/~~ c~Tr~i!5~5 rt~~ Ct~~~-r~ Cl~.s~6c-~ fi Cc~iF~~~~ ~I`T- Tom- ~~%~~.>> ,3" ~~ ~~ ,}~iC /6~~~ /.~ ~ ~ ~~ `~ 14Z~1 ice,'- S~,~C~E' J ~.,~~t 'i~~~~,L.~'~t~~-1 C C'~z • Cif REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW NON-RESIDENTIAL USAGE (MINOR OFFICES) AT 6710 BERYL STREET, A LOCALLY DESIGNATED HISTORICAL LANDMARK CJ APN 0202-461-6.i-0000, the Charles Stoebe House, located at 6710 Beryl Street, was designated as a H:stortc Landmark per Rancho Cucamonga Resolutton No 84-222 enacted on August I5, 1984 As late as 2001, this Queen Anne style house was in dire need of some major restoration Although a highly visible property since rt was ongmally constructed m 1895, the building was allowed to decay to an embarrassing state, despite well-mtenhoned efforts to maintain it Due to rts proximity to the heavily traveled 19w Street (as seen in this 1992 photo taken by Robert Stauffacher) the traffic noise and accompanying dirt and fumes rendered the house un-inhabitable. The building matenals and techniques used m the late 19`h century were not designed for 21S` Century vehicular pollution ~jchibi-} ~ C~J Under the direction of Jack Hall, the h~stonc home has undergone quite a number of repairs over the last few yeazs, as the facade has been restored to a state resembling the original whtle the interior electric and plumbtng have been modemtzed Professional landscaping has been installed along both Beryl and 19a' Streets making the comer very appealing ~m T' ~_ ~: ~• ~:s':h " ~ - The picture h the left ~~ ~ ;~-, ? ~~= ~ -f~s' 7`" ` i illustrates ow the r='°wa">'~~'~L~ ~-_ .- landscaping has enhanced the property, prov~dmg a pastoral setting to the old home with the snow-capped mountains m the background. This front azea desperately needed paving as each winter it became one huge mud-puddle With Mr. Hall having plans of developing the property shortly the asphalt ~s thin, with the intention of removing rt when work on the planned development occurs The proposed development will include enhanced landscaping upon removal the paved azea Please notice that the two spaces closest to the house aze designated as Handicapped Parking and an area next to Beryl Street has been allocated for the future mstallauon of a public sidewalk Looking at the Stoebe House from the rear, one can see that the stone cooling room has been repaired and that the gable has been rebuilt The present chain Imk fence with rts green screening will be replaced with a block wall when the proposed development is approved • • • ~I~D -, J Mr Hall has made a mator commitment to this house as rt approaches its 110`n anniversary The restoration and modem~zat~on has been a major job but it pales compazed to the effort required to maintain the ancient building As one may notice from the pictures of the front of the home, there is tarpaper between the first and second floor windows Just recently many of the shingles had to be removed m order to - - ~ _ . -° _' ~ exterminate a bees' ~ -~ ~ _ _ ~ nest built m the walls _~ ~~ When removing the G~ ~ =- ~l ~ shingles rt was " - ~=~~ " ~ discovered that the ._ r,ri/~'"'~~ original round ~ - __,, ~!~"_"~--~-- shingles had been ~'' ( - , ~ replaced m this secrion with newer, ~ dog-eazed ones At the time the picture __..~ was taken we were Brill waiting for a- supplier who is custom manufacturing the rou nd shingles to match the original ones The effort and commitment on Mr Hall's part is stressed not to win compliments on his being a good neighbor, but rather to bring attention to the very expensive pace tag that came with the restoration. Over the last few years ~t has cost over $250,000 to bring the Stoebe House to its current condition Mr Hall figures rt will cost much more over the next few years to mamtam the home and to continue its restoration This cost would be far too proh~brtive if there were not a valued use for the home. A Conditional Use Permit ~s requested to allow Westem Pacific Development and Construction Company, Inc to use the building as its administrative offices Western Pacific is a successful real estate developer who has had protects in Bloomington, Fontana and Rialto but concentrates on m-fill protects m El Monte. Their work in redeveloping the City of El Monte and m prov~dmg affordable housing has been recognized by civic organizations m the area (such as the Frve Points Rotary Club of El • Monte). The company has received a Certificate of Commendation from the City of El L~1 Monte, a Certificate of Appreciation from the California State Legislature and a Certificate of Recognition from the California State Senate. • We feel fortunate that Western Pacific has chosen to utilize the building over its many choices for an office location. With its success and highly desirable work force, many cities actively pursued the company, hoping to get them involved in their community. However, Western Pacific finds the building not only attractive, lending a certain charm and image to the firm, but also perfectly suited to their needs. The company has a staff of eight employees and the restored building offers privacy while still maintaining afamily-like atmosphere. The majority of the employees work in the accounting section while others coordinate with outside engineers, architects, contractors and city officials involved with the active developments. The employees are all highly educated and compensated quite well. They enjoy working in Alta Loma, frequently shopping~in the many retail stores located in Rancho Cucamonga. The setting works well for their occasional meetings> with current and potential investors in the developments. Their sister company, Royal Crest Construction, rents office space close by at 7365 Carnelian. The office is open Monday through Friday, from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. The operation does not generate excessive traffic or noise aad we~feel it fits the description of minor offices with small-scale use. With the exception of office supplies, deliveries to the business are made by UPS or Federal Express vans on their normal routes. There is no storage of construction equipment or vehicles on the property. • • C-~ r~ r.~ RESOLUTION NO 06-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01173, A REQUEST TO CONVERT AN EXISTING HISTORIC HOME INTO AN OFFICE ON 1 4 GROSS ACRE OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 6710 BERYL STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0202-461-65 r~ LJ A Recitals 1 Jack Hall filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01173, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 26th day of Apnl 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearng on that date B Resolution All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 The Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 26, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 6710 Beryl Street, which is at the southwest corner of 19th Street and Beryl Street, and b The design review process for the proposed protect has been completed, and • c The property includes one historic residence, parking for a maximum of ten automobiles, with surrounding landscaping, a 6-foot tall decorative block wall, and wrought iron fencing 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows Cl~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-44 DRC2004-01 1 73 -JACK HALL April 26, 2006 Page 2 a The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and c The application, which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 The Planning Department Staff has determined that the protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The protect qualifies under Section 14 California Code Regulations Section 15332, in-fdl development protect The Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based upon its own independent tudgment, hereby concurs in the staff's determination of exemption Additionally, the Commission makes the following findings in support of the exemption determination • a The protect is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies, as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations (with the approved conditional use permit) Specifically, this property is within the "Residential" general plan designation, and within Development District R-3, the property is currently zoned for residential use In accord with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17 08 030(E)(7)(a), the proposed small-scale, non-residential use will be lawful with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit b The proposed development occurs within City limits on a protect site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses Specifically, the protect is located at the corner of 19th Street and Beryl Street, which is within the City limits The protect is surrounded by urban uses, including a church and residential development The gross protect site area is 1 4 acre c The protect site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species The protect site is already graded and developed with an historic structure, and the protect simply proposes a change in the use of that structure As the site is already developed, it does not have any value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species d Approval of this protect would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quaiity The proposed protect will allow asmall-scale, office use on the site This change from residential to non-residential use will not produce a significant increase in traffic because of the small-scale nature of the office use, and the fact that the protect site is located next to two fully developed and operational through streets (19th Street and Beryl Street) Further, the protect will not result in any significant noise impacts, as the proposed use is a small-scale office environment and thus the non-residential use itself will not produce noise impacts Additionally, given the small size of the proposed parking lot and the existence of two fully developed streets (19th Street and Beryl Street) which surround the • protect site, there is not expected to be any significant traffic-related noise caused by the protect Moreover, the protect will not result in significant, adverse air quality impacts, because C Zp PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-44 DRC2004-01173 -JACK HALL April 26, 2006 Page 3 of both to its type of use (office) and small-scale nature Finally, the protect will not create significant water quality impacts, as the protect site is not located near a body of water, and proposed office use will not disturb the water table e The protect site can be adequately served by all regwred utilities and public services First, because of the small-scale nature of the protect, there is not expected to be any significant demand for public services Second, the protect site is located next to two developed and operational streets (19th Street and Beryl Avenue), both of which could provide access for any necessary public services Finally, as the protect site is already developed with a residence, utilities are currently in place and in service 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Commission hereby approves the application, subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning DeoartmenUDesign Review Committee 1) Approval is hereby granted for the conversion of an existing historic home into an office on 1 4 gross acre of land at 6710 Beryl Street, subtect to the following use limitations under the Landmark • Alteration Permit 2) All parking stalls shall be clearly striped and permanently maintained as set forth in the Municipal Code (specifically section 17 12 030(A)(12)) , 3) All parking spaces shall consist of rectangular areas not less than 9 feet wide by 18 feet wide 4) The parking facility shall provide a perimeter landscaped strip at least 5 feet wide (inside dimension) where the facility adtoins the side property line 5) The parking facility shall be landscaped with at least one 15-gallon minimum size tree for every 3 parking stalls (which may be clustered or grouped) and appropriate ground cover, as specified in the Municipal Code (specifically section 17 12 030(A)(11)) 6) Ali landscaping and elevation must match the existing historic nature of the property and structures thereon 7) Permanent fencing m accord with the Municipal Code (specifically, section 17 12 030(A)(10)(c)) is regwred No chain link fence is allowed around the property CZl PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-44 DRC2004-01 1 73 -JACK HALL April 26, 2006 Page 4 8) Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall not waive the regwrements of the Uniform Bwlding Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, or any City Ordinances 9) The exposed rear yard and parkway along 19th Street regwre a form of legal landscape. 10) All landscaped areas shall be kept free of weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy, growing condition and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead (except for planned "dead fall" and "dead snag" indicated on the Landscape Plan) and diseased plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from date of damage 11) All walls faang public wew should be decorative in nature and provide architectural style to match the historic home A river rock theme is recommended, to match the elements of the home 12) The trash enclosure shall be built to City standards, including a roll-up door and an overhead feature, such as fabric mesh, to keep debris from blowing out The trash enclosure elevations shall match the historic nature of the property 13) Additional trees and shrubs shall be provided along the parking area to screen vehicles from public view (and provide shading) Provide 15-gallon trees and 5-gallon shrubs to match the historic landscape palette of the property Fire Department 1) Place a sign declaring "This Door to Remain Unlocked During Business Hours" over the main (front) door 2) Install 10-inch address numbers, faang Beryl Street, on the upper third of the structure, with lighting to be activated automatically after daylight 3) Charge and certify all regwred fire extingwshers. 4) Provide a gate at the rear of the property that is at least 20 feet wide, and which has a Knox bypass switch. 5) Install a 3200 serves Knox Box at the front door, 5 feet to 7 feet above finished floor 6) Maintain a set of building keys in the Knox Box • L' Z Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-44 DRC2004-01173 -JACK HALL April 26, 2006 • Page 5 7) Provide asmoke/flame development certificate for the carpet (must be Class I or Class II) 8) Install a staircase on the rear elevation Bwlding and Safety Department 1) Romex at security lighting must be located inside the structure, Romex is not allowed in an exposed location 2) Remove electrical stub outs in the rear yard 3) Provide plans that depict both the original walls and new walls that have been added 4) Provde a detailed Framing and Floor Plan 5) Provide adequate weather protection at the roof over the rock room 6) Complete drywall in the attic room • 7) Provide verification to show that the glass is tempered in the attic room 8) Provide GFCI m all receptacles m restrooms, kitchen, and wet bar areas 9) Supply separate and adequate gas lines for each water heater 10) Obtain necessary permits for all newly-installed water heaters 11) Strap down all water heaters to prevent horizontal displacement 12) Handicapped parking must conform to all applicable regwrements, as set forth in the California Building Code and the Muniapal Code 13) Provide documentation from Edison International as to whether residential service will be allowed (as is currently the case) or commercial service will be required 14) Provide ahandicapped-accessible sidewalk and ramp for access to the structure 15) Provide a second staircase for egress from the second floor of the structure • 16) The threshold to the front and rear doors shall not be more than 1/2-inch m height L23 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-44 DRC2004-01 1 73 -JACK HALL April 26, 2006 Page 6 • 17) All door handles shall be level type 18) Ahandicapped-accessible bathroom shall be provided on the first floor of the bwlding 19) Provide written analysis from a licensed structural engineer regarding the rock room to the rear of the house 20) All regwred doorvvays shall have a regwred opening width of 32 inches clear when the door is at a 90-degree angle 21) A clear path of 32 inches is regwred in the kitchen 22) Handicapped-accessible signage, which conforms to all California Bwlding Code and Municipal Code speafications, is regwred at the entrance to the site, the entrance to the building, and the bathroom 23) Toilet room floors shall have a smooth, hard, nonabsorbent surface (such as Portland cement, ceramic tile, or other approved material) that extends upward onto the walls at least 5 inches 24) Toilet rooms shall have a fully operable exterior window with an • area not less than 3 square feet, or a vertical duct not less than 100 square inches in area, for the first water closet, plus 50 square inches of additional area for each additional water closet, or a mechanically operated exhaust system capable of providing a complete change of air every 15 minutes Such mechanically operated exhaust system shall be connected directly to the outside, and the point of discharge shall be at least 3 feet from any opening that allows air entry into occupied portions of the bwlding Code Enforcement Department 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be obtained for the removal and replacement of the heritage trees removed from the property 2) A City Business License is regwred for the business activity conducted on the property 3) Ail trash containers and/or dumpsters must be enclosed or removed from view unless out for pick-up 4) All broken windows must be repaired or replaced 5) All storage, equipment, and materials currently located in the rear and side yards must be removed or enclosed out of public view • C 2y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-44 DRC2004-01173 -JACK HALL April 26, 2006 . Page 7 6) Remove the secondary dwelling unit (i e ,the Layton recreational vehicle) located to the rear of the property 7) All vehicles parked or stored in the rear/side yard of the property must be screened or removed 8) All scrap lumber, discarded or unused objects, equipment, parts, containers, construction equpment, funk, trash, and debris must be removed or enclosed from view 9) Ail torn and tattered tarps must be removed from view 10) All vehicles must be parked on an improved surface 11) No recreational vehicles are allowed to be stored on the property 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • C 25 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01173 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 6710 BERYL STREET APPLICANT: JACK HALL LOCATION: 6710 BERYL STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the Clty, Its agents, offlcers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01173 Is granted subject to the approval of Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2006-00226 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-44 Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire If building permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained In accordance with the approved plans which Include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file In the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2004-Oi 173StdCond 4-26 doc Comolehon Date _/_/_. / / / / / / C Z~ Project No DRC2004-01173 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Clty Planner • 3 Occupancy of the faculties shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Budding Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bulding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be • located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 11 The project contains a designated Historical Landmark The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No DRC2006-00226 Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or Interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall regwre a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units buildings with open spaces/plazas/ • recreational uses / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / -/ ~ / / / / / / / / / / / / I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2004-01173StdCond 4^-'2'~6 doc C -2 1 Protect No DRC2004-01173 ComoleLOn Date 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho _/_/_• Cucamnga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of budding permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right of way E. Tri p Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multi-family _/_/_ residential prolects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior tinal map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in _/_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The • location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial prolects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office prolects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls 5 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development _/_/_ Code This regwrement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting 7 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code • 3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stt Rpt\DRC2004-01 i73StdCond 4-26 doc C 2t3 Project No DRC2004-07173 Completion Date G. Signs • 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs H. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements 1 A change in occupancy is required prior to Building and Safety final _/_/_ 2 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following -/-/- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, • c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and 3 Planning Department Project Number (i e , DRC2004-01173) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 4 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 5 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 6 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_I_ Building and Safety Department r~ LJ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res 8 Stf Rpt\DRC200A-01773StdCond 4-26 doc C /~ Protect No DRC2004-01173 Completion Date J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_• marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2004-01173) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for the change of occupancy protect, the applicant shall pay _/_/_ development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 4 ADA parking and building access must be addressed on the plans _/_/_ K. Existing Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for the property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings 2 Due to the scope of the protect, an Occupancy Change review is required Submit plans to the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department to determine compliance for the proposed use 3 Provide required restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix Chapter 29 and also in accordance _/_/_ with ADA 4 All existing must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 ~_/ 5 Upon occupancy change plan check submittal, additional requirements may be required _/_/_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 44 total feet on 19th Street _/_/_ 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ M. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped _/_/_ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2004-01173StdCond 4-26 doc C3D Protect No DRC2004-01173 2 Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes • and for which a permit Is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Sitle- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm 7rali Metlian Island Bike Trail Other Beryl Street X X X X X X 19th Street X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays well be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, Including street trees, street Ilghts, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the Clty • Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, priorto final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer d Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer e Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per Clty Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program 6 Completion Date / / ~_~- / / / / / / / / I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2006 Res & StF Rpt\DRC2004-01173StdCond 4-26 doc C31 Protect No DRC2004-01173 Comolenon Date 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typlcally sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Mm Grow Space Spacing Size ~ty BERYL STREET P A 8 ft or greater Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8 ft 30 fl o c 15-gal Fill-in P A 5 ft or greater Gegera parviflora Australian Willow 5 ft 20 fl o c 75-gal FIII-in P A less than 5 ft Eriobotrya deflexa Bronze Loquat Tree 3 ft 25 ft o c 15-gal Fill-in 19TH STREET Lagerstroemia Crape Myrtle Hybrid- 3 ft 20 ft o c 24-inch Fill-in indica "Muskogee" Lavender box Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the Ciry inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required N. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer O. Drainage and Flood Control Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk P. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / / L J -/-/- / / / / / / / / / / -/-/~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2006 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2004-Ot 173StdCond 4-26 doc C 32 Protect No DRC2004-01173 Completion Date Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from • the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application Is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED / / / / / / I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMi2006 Res 8 Sd Rpt\DRC2004-01173StdCond 4-26 doc C33 ~,a„ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services REVIEW COMMENTS June 7, 2005 Protect Properties Number 7 SWC Beryl w/19th Street and 6710 Beryl DRC2004-01173 Fire Construction Services has reviewed your plans submitted for Conditional Use Permit. This protect review was based on the plans submitted which reflect (1) existing Histoncal SFR, R-3 occupancy, and V-N type construction to be converted for Business office use, occupancy B The project has been determined to be incomplete for the following reasons: 1 Fire District fees are due 2 Change of Occupancy is regwred The existing occupancy will not permit the proposed use . The specifics of the buildings on this protect, such as occupancy, square footage, height, number of stories and type of construction were not found on the plans Fire Construction Services regwres this information to provide the applicant with a complete review and applicable comments Please provide the necessary building data on your next submittal When all of the above outstanding Fire District issues have been resolved, your protect will be deemed complete by the Fire Distract and with the approval from all of the other City Divisions, it may advance to the next step in the process Please contact Moises Eskenazi, Sr. Plans Examiner at 909-477-2710 ext. 4209 to answer any questions or set-up an appointment as necessary. Reference the following brief description of the outstanding issues and instructions on how to resolve them. FIRE DISTRICT FEES of $132 00 must be paid Please proceed to the Fire Construction Services (FCS) counter to pay the outstanding fire fees on this protect CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY plan is required to be submitted to Bwlding & Safety for the evaluation of the proposed use in the existing residential or commercial/industrial bwlding Some of the issues that must be addressed include (but are not limited to) ADA accessibtlity to the bwldings and facilities (such as restrooms), ADA parking, allowable area ratios, area separation walls, maximum occupant loads, type of doors, swing of doors, panic hardware, exit signs, emergency illumination, aisle widths and direct • exiting cntena C 3`I T H E C I T Y O F R A N C II O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE Apnl 26, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Donald Granger, Assoaate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION AND AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P - A request for a time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map for the development of 21 single-family lots on 15 15 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue The requested amendment involves minor adjustments to street alignments for the purpose of increasing lot depth to 200 feet in compliance with current City standard while maintaining the same number oflots -APN 0225-131-16 Related File Development Review DRC2005-00401 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00401 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P -The design review of building elevations and Detailed Site Plan for 21 single-family lots on 15 15 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue -APN 0225-131-16 Related Files Preliminary Review DRC2004-00466 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 1 39 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Vacant Land/Neighborhood Commercial and Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre), Et~wanda Specific Plan South - Etiwanda Creek Park/Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Speafic Plan East - Open Space and Flood Control/Open Space, Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Single-Family Dwelling Units (Under Construction) and Fire Station 176/Estate Residential (1 dwelling unit per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan Items D & E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16114 AND DRC2005-00401 -TRIMARK HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 2 C General Plan Desionat~ons Project Site -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) North - Neighborhood Commercial and Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling urnts per acre) South - Open Space East - Conservation West - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The 15 15 acres of land is located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of W ilson Avenue. The project site is rectangular in shape. North of the site is undeveloped land that is zoned Neighborhood Commercial and Very Low Residential, south of the site is Etiwanda Creek Park, east of the site is undeveloped land (Flood Control); and Fire Station No 176 and single-family homes are located to the west The project site is undeveloped, with no existing structures The developer has successfully plotted all corrals to meet the 70-foot radws requirement from all adjacent dwelling units ANALYSIS A General The density of the project will be 1.39 dwelling units per acre, consistent with the Basic Development Standards of the Development Code The applicant is proposing three house plans (one 1-story and two, 2-story). Under the Etiwanda Specific Plan, this project is developed under the Basic Development Standards, and although no specific architectural style is regwred, the protect must meet the design goals of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan r 1 L J The proposed project consists of three floor plans with 4 architectural styles that range in square • footage from 3,878 to 5,078 square feet. All of the proposed architectural styles are appropriate to the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, incorporating traditional elements with a rural emphasis The applicant has made good use of porches, traditional materials, and variation in the roof planes A total of five elevations are proposed, and include Tuscan, Traditional, Executive Farmhouse, Adobe, and Monterey design themes All plans have articulation in the footprints and the wall planes, thereby avoiding °box on box" building forms All plans have been designed with decorative driveways Most plans have been designed with front porches, which is a design goal of the Etiwanda Specific Pian Plan 1 is a single-story and has been plotted on three lots (14 percent of the subdivision), thereby meeting the targeted goal of 10 to 20 percent single-story product mix. There are four corner lots in the subdivision, three that have been plotted with the single-story product (75 percent of the subdivision), which is also a design goal of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan B Time Extension for Tentative Tract Mao SUBTT16114 The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTTi6114 on June 27, 2001, fora 3-year period. This Time Extension request was submitted on June 22, 2004, and is the first request for a Time Extension Since the subdivision was fast approved on June 27, 2001, the Development Standards for lot depths in the Very Low Residential District have increased from 150 feet to 200 feet. The applicant has modified the layout of the subdivision to meet the 200-foot lot depth requirement and has also adjusted the local trails to have a 15-foot wide equestrian easement with a separate 3-foot drainage easement Both modifications are enhancements to the proposed subdivsion and enable the subdivision to meet the current Development Standards. The applicant has designed Lot 13 to be an interim floodwater detention basin until the San Bernardino County Flood Control Distract completes the regional faalities p~,E a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16114 AND DRC2005-00401 - TRIMARK HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 • Page 3 On January 6, 1999, the City Council amended the City's Subdivision Ordinance to establish a 3-year initial approval period for tract and parcel maps (increased from 2 years previously) The amendment also allows the Planning Commission to grant Time Extensions in 12-month increments for up to 5 years (a maximum of 6 years from the original time of approval), which is the maximum allowed under the State Subdivision Map Act Section 66452 69 (e) If the Time Extension is approved by the Planning Commission, the new expiration date would be June 22, 2007 C. Design Review Committee The request for a Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 and the corresponding Development Rewew DRC2005-00401 for house product and Detailed Site Plan was reviewed by the Design Rewew Committee (Stewart, McPhail, and Coleman) on February 28, 2006, and March 14, 2006, respectively At the February 28, 2006, meeting, the Committee reviewed the Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 and recommended approval On March 14, 2006, the Committee reviewed Development Review DRC2005-00401 and recommended approval subfect to the following conditions 1) The side elevations on Plan 1 A shall be enhanced and 2) All perimeter walls are to be block material in order to provide additional fue protection. The applicant has enhanced the side elevation of Plan 1A in response to the Committee's direction (Exhibit F) The Committee's conditions have been included in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval. D Grading Review Committee• The request for a Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 and the corresponding Development Review DRC2005-00401 for house product and Detailed Site Plan was reviewed by the Grading Committee on February 28, 2006, and • March 14, 2006, respectively At the February 28, 2006, meeting, the Committee reviewed the Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map and recommended approval, subfect to a condition that weep holes be provided in the block located on the north property for drainage purposes On March 14, 2006, the Committee reviewed Development Review DRC2005-00401 and recommended approval, subfect to a condition that the driveway grades be a maximum of 12 percent The Committee's conditions have been included in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval E. Technical Review Committee The request for a Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 and the corresponding Development Rewew DRC2005-00401 for house product was reviewed by the Technical Committee on February 28, 2006, and March 14, 2006, respectively. The Committee recommended approval of the Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 and Development Review DRC2005-00401, subfect to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval F Environmental Assessment. Part 1 of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant, and staff completed Part II of the Initial Study Staff determined that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact onshort-term air quality during the site preparation, such as grading and egwpment exhaust Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce impacts to short term air quality The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than-significant-level As identified in the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, the site is located in an area that may contain Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Habitat Accordingly, a biological assessment of the site by Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) in December of 2004, was conducted to evaluate the potential of the site to . support special-status wildlife species and vegetation including, but not limited to, the following. Burrowing Owl, Coastal California Gnatcatcher, San Diego Horned Lizard, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, Slender-Horned Spineflower, and Johnston's Buckwheat A biologist conducted a ~j ~E '3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16114 AND DRC2005-00401 - TRIMARK HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 4 • literature review and a physical walk of the entire site in order to evaluate the potential occurrence of sensitive biological resources on the protect site Additionally, a focused survey for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat was completed in 2004 The biological assessment report states that the protect site is heavily disturbed Several dirt roads traverse the site, and disang for weed abatement purposes is evident on most of the property The site contains no blue line streams Of all the known sensitive biological resources known to occur within the region, only two (Los Angeles Pocket Mouse and Northwestern San Diego Pocket Mouse) are known tooccur on-site. Even though neither of these species is formally listed as threatened or endangered, both species are classified as California Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Game (CAFG) A previous focused survey for the California Gnatcatcher (Impact Sciences, 2001) for the 15 15-acre protect area was negative No California Gnatcatchers were recorded on the protect site dunng the six surveys of the focused survey in 2001. The focused survey further ales that the generally disturbed nature of the site, historic practice of weed abatement, and the proximity of adtacent agriculture have resulted in the absence: of sutable habitat for the California Gnatcatcher. Because the focused survey for the Gnatcatcher was conducted in 2001, MBA conducted subsequent habitat assessments of the protect site in 2003, 2004, and 2005. Further, MBA conducted a final visit to the protect site on August 18, 2005, and found the site to be highly disturbed, and that the protect site does not provide suitable habitat for the California Gnatcatcher, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, and San Diego Horned Lizard. The protect wtll necessitate the construction of a 48-inch storm drain line from the southeast corner of Lot 13 to a downstream connection point at Banyan Street located southeasterly of the • subdivision Since the proposed storm drain line runs through Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS), a biological resource assessment was conducted in order to survey the site for potential sensitive biological resources RAFSS is composed of an assortment of drought-deaduous sub- shrubs and large, evergreen wood shrubs that have the ability to exist in periodic and intense episodes of flooding and erosion that occur along alluvial fans Thomas J. McGill of Michael Brandman Assoaates (MBA) walked the proposed route of the storm drain line. According to the report by MBA Assoaates, there are no blue line streams depicted on the USGS topographic quadrangle or Federal or State turisdictional features within the proposed route of the storm drain line The reports indicate that because of the maturing nature of the RAFSS habitat and lack of hydrological processes, suitable habitat for potentially occurring speaal status for sensitive speces is not present The report recommends that pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Califomia Department of Fish and Game Code (CDFG), removal of any trees, shrubs, or any other potentially nesting habitat should not occur during the nesting season (generally February through August). The report recommends that apre-construction survey for nesting birds be done prior any ground disturbing activities If active nests are found, informal consulting with CDFG is recommended If the birds are found to be nesting within 500 feet of the impact area, construction will need to be postponed until it is determined that the nest has successfully fledged young, and it is determined by a qualified ornithologist that the nest is no longer active A mitigation measure has been included in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval requinngthat apre-construction survey for nesting birds shall be done prior any ground disturbing activities Staff concluded that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality dunng site preparation, such as grading and equipment exhaust Mitigation • measures will be regwred to reduce impacts to short-term air quality The mitigation measures will ~~" y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16114 AND DRC2005-00401 - TRIMARK HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 . Page 5 reduce these impacts to a less-than-significant level If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and sods, hydrology and water quality, and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the protect. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant held one neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed protect on August 24, 2005 No residents attended the meeting. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site Staff regwred the applicant to post a large 4-foot by 6-foot Notice of Fling sign on the property, which was also used to post the City's public hearing notice RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Since the request for a Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 has been under review since June of 2004, in order to evaluate environmental impacts under CEQA and because of off-site storm drain issues that regwred coordination with the City's Engineering Department and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the request for a Time Extension and Amended Map for Tentative Tract SUBTT16114 and grant a total of three, one year Time Extensions through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions (expiration June 27, 2007) Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2005-00401 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC.DG/ge P~E_S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16114 AND DRC2005-00401 - TRIMARK HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 6 • Attachments Exhibit A -Site Uttlization Map Exhibit B -Site Plan Exhibit C -Grading Plan Exhibit D -Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Exhibit E -Landscape Plan Exhibit F - Bwlding Elevations Exhibit G Exhibit H -Floor Plans -Design Revew Committee Action Agenda dated February 28, 2006, for SUBTT16114TE Exhibit I -Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated March 14, 2006, for DRC2005-00401 Exhibit J -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension and Amended Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2005-00401 DBE"~ • TRACT 16114 SITE UTILIZATION MAP ~~ x ^~1 1 D ... " MWD PIPELINE " WATER M 24TH STREET s - P I I li 1 ';O I L ITS-j~^T-5 I 225-IJI-0I i ,-_~dPJ I ~- zonlu.c-Nc I T25-122-491 I I i r 21~-122-50 / E vms w u/i ®'6 ~ 1 'I ~ 4 k ®I I h - - T VACANT J ~ ~ 9l3 /F - I ) 1 ~-' - -'-~= 225-I]I-i6 J i 111 I I 'i ~~ ~, I ___{ I y I r `~ ~ I I _ _ ~ - iRACT 16113 '"" I SITE BOUNDARY u°"" ' " Pu ' ' ~`~'.~~?.:Is r~P , I'^" I \I N a 225-1J1-6 Y 55 .C \© I T25-131-5 'FUTURE STREEq I OO ~I SB FLOOD T?S-ITT-90 rn .c A I {I`# nJJ ~ ~flh el~~' I ZON I TTS-ITT-fiT , . ® 1; FIRE STATION/ ~.I i °e" ' ZONING-ER_ Ih' n k P~YIi ?877 - - -- _ _ - - -- I (' I~ 225-IJI-27, '~ :, r w -_ J =`TRACT-76114` ' ~6 ____ __ ____ _ ~ _- i ` r SITE BOUNDARY ® ~ Q~ ~CULAI YPTUS TRELSI srv¢ S I G~ 225-122-~T h- I j ~ " ' VACAN i I to I ' u ~ I e oz ec ~ I ~I 201JING-VL _ - ' PART; SIIE I i _ I ' _ ____ _ _ __ _ ____ __ ~- - -SCHOOL -~ -- Q~ 1NTY NTROI 3 225-131-15 OS .d .c 225-1 -1a 7 e~ Y~ o.[ 1 ( ,I I t rl.xxw[ gxyW C.`# xVUd[P ex[X"S-dJ.U~ i J v r p T W yR L ~ ~ &?Q~3 I ~ ~ i~~~~ 1 ~~,i~ _ __--_. 7T __i~~~ --n~_~_~_i i~ -_ _____, _ ~ ~ ;~ . ~~,w ~ _~.r, ~', ,, , I ~ , . ' er i i ` - _ _ -sCi~' - ~ ~ ~ O - ' _ ~ I -_ __ ti~ ~ G , - ,fA ' ' ~ _ ~ • 1 j ~ J e _ ~__ ~ _ C ~ i _ =`r_ ` ~. aavi~r _ ~~ ~ ~~ ' r i i '~ r '~~- .~_-L~y I~ Q ~.. IN 1 ~ u ~ .~ yG ' I i I ~ i ~~ a ~ . ~ I ~ ` ~ * ]G Z !1} O .- ~; . 3 -_ _ _ _-_ _ - ---- F~"~~T~ ~' ~,'~~ o~l j~ I I'~~ '' rI Q ~,~ d Ji~~\ t`R, _ pI J _ I ys , ,~ _j ¢~ wl ~ Y WIp $.C z ~ ~° ~I _ ~I ;. C ~~ E ~~ W x °i O y ~ ~f 3 W y1~k >I :y~4 W i F^ of ~~-~ u • C ^O C ~ a 8 BF ~ ?~ ~ E 6 S & ~' R ~ ~ ~~~q:pYpy~~4i~~~eg ~~31 ~ ~ i ., > `B~~~FE~~@~Y~lO~~~~4 is,1d i ~~g .ee tYEexsd j I _.V ~ t',~ 1 TI .~d ~ ~I~ to 0 r ~ Z m ~ J Batt z ~ r o?ZCD Q r 0 Z o WNQN ~ ~ 11. HUH U 'W S ~a O Y J L i~" __ '~ Z ~. ~,~ ~I~ ~S -~2~ d F Y 1 pg~ {p i 1 c f ~ y o~` 6M ~ ~i p~~~ 4g 91~ i8B " ~~ "~ ~ ~1 1 s ~~ yp~ 3a1 v~ py~5 ~ ~f( E4 e; ~d € g! y~F ~E °3e~~ ~#EE [[~ ~@ ~ppp¢ 9 ~Q ~ (° i~ ~ ! °4i ~~ P3 ° ~ Ir P i 3 ~gg ~ } ~' Ej fi §°§ { Q ° t t 1~ ~ E .e 1~ ~ jrg4 j6F 9 x~ ~E4 7 €i g~ ~ %~' F 9 1i S~ [~ ~ 4 6~ ( E Ef .v E t o e ~SE Y E le e~ p 9 E~ ~d ~p pa P s~~A si((.l ~§ vF ~, Y°£3 e ~ p1 FF E'i 1 EF ~ ~ €~ iE 1` € 3 l;E. ~~ ~iE s~~ ~ :F 4~i € ~~ 63 p FE ~ g sal ~~ EI ~ i= a !si 's ! 33 6_ @B a ~~ vEln PC gg44~ (({{ 1 0§ .~°( P~ E ~gg ~ F Fie E~ ~j '~ ~ °~ ~ 11'P €` ae s3 §j§e , '#7s 9tr s ED ~fis ~ Y~ ~1 Y §F ~ E 8es EEi:.+ i E ~_ . :CE ~~ F ~ ~` Ei ~, ° 5 v3~ € a FIE pai if IF i 6 1 y6~ i~ €~ €e~s a~ g~p~ j~q ~d eE :E€ ~ ~~ B~ t~ ~[ g ~ ~Ea FAY °E , ~ ~ !tt 33 'a ~i 9BE EF . YYs g 9 39 E p ii ~fifi ~,€ §~ € e~p ('A ~~ ~~[{ "~e Qg °EF ~~ {~ d$~E € ~F g9: 9e ~C~ € ~ p F. Ee ~. 3~ pp @~~ i~ a; ° E! a ~~ iQg Ev g a 1~ 7 tl °e Egg pp [p ~ F~F g a ~ ~Y A° apes F€`° a Al ej ~$ yG F { ~e ° ~~ c !6 ° ~ ~ i F ~1 AEv E~CS°dp~°~ ~ @` iF 1Ec Y ;~ e E ~E ai ~r§E i. Far~F v[e ~p ~g~ 3~s e~ ~°3 Q~ ~a yb9 @ B~ °p ~+ Y' Ei F~ ~v ~.. ~yy ~F: ~€ : F ~ [p°•a E c• $ `-_e ^ e[y ee aF ~pp 1. 1 ,oa ?S @ ,a "s~ .EEB .l .6eF6 .FF .4 sE::EF =F ci? .~ e9 e ~ ~ e~ -'S~ EE :r c _I I{a ~r I f y Q F i 6 ~ ~i i I~ ~ gA~ ~I i I i~ ~ ~ e ~i =x ~F tiu z J~ 1~ ~< 2~ o- C G~ yyNV 7i <~ 3 ~ J7 Jp '9 4. e,% r 79.E i o'e I i k~=~ i ;~ ~ ~~ c t 4ia ~ I-I:.I 'i i3~~ly~ ~~ c~~~~9!r~( ~~ Op vii ~ ~ ~ al , ~ -I~ I , ~ p ~; ° ~~~~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~w ~~ sf~ I~~~,~E ~€ i ~ Iii P! _i~. _,i.l.. ;gd.r~__~:lyyyel ~~ T~~Q I~e [F~'c~f~~~.4~~:2R%. ~~sli !~ ~U~~ a 3 `u Z J ~ d ~ W Z ~ `o ~ Z <~U W ~~~ ~ MW ~ LL ~a ~Y-, ~ - _' ~~ ~~ ~ ~' E.Y~ 4 } ~3 .g 'b ,! ~i,. „~~ ~, ~~ '~ !d ~s .I ~ .- ~ -- -- A ~- ~ ~- ~: , i ~ tlf ~' ~3 '.I _ eb __~ 2ZF h Q kX1>Z6z'~ C--~ R !~i K ? _'y ~h . ~~ ~; , a .~~ e .5 ~~g~ ~£ a~.. ¢~T {e{~~ eqq` p2E t • ~C a' ~ b- i i i. s~_' ~` a B ~ ie r~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~~ ~ 8s g ~ ~I ~ I ~ ~ < ~ ~ ~-~ 2 n W yWj N z Orw 2NN :: -10 Hoisuw ~o ~~anxna~o - - I ~:~ u n..:'dld ,:~ _.., ... n~J.K~ a, .>„ ~ •~.- s„ „1-1„ NO/13JS -~~~ ..rW _ ~ ; . _ _ ____ rop' _ _ _ ____ __ .__ ~.~.~ .. u~ „5-S„ NU11,7~5 .,.e .,,..~ v- LM „~1-2/„ NO/l,7JS m .~, l - .~~~, w „ e, ~~~.._ „a=b -NO7r~~s ,,.,,~,~ V - ~~;~ - ~i,- Nni/-~~5 M~,..~~ , i~_ ...~ „~w M.....,~ ~~....u. ux .,~~ ~ b... -a_-- -u~„~yyr nM ..Q+~,ri "" euoo... ~.,.o -.., ,wy ~„~.. si ~~ ,a.~..wo r „wow-Nair3~s ws iw,/ 7--7, N~7/1.7J5 .~ ~4 .~.,,..w~:~ ~M r,~ ,~ ,~. ,o~ b... <, - ~~~ ~o-. -~,- NO/1.275 ~.w..~., r s Wv! ~ n.....o . _„ ;~ ,H-H, NO%lJ7S ~ ~ , ~m ~ r I - `um ,a'eu w v (1% I~ ^~ (~ I> -Ij~ ~lei IT_-~_ ~© ¢ ' ~'~i31 ~:', 31a131eIF~=i313 3!c 3 3'a~&i~ 4~ cc i ~I~iR!:14 q, [:~i{i@I9I:,T :: cl:-.c: C ~ s ~, i _-.,i _L _1~.i1~ -'- ~ `fit `~ ?,~ v ° --- ~ ~a 2 o e f _~I - ~ HT~ i ii -p I ~CdCe3 ~ ~ S ~aQ ~~I ~ R~~ 5~ A j ~C3 9__ .. e p ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~,.~ ~~ ~~~ '~I aa~~ll ~I'60~1 ~ ~' II I xx r~,S~ I° ~ A = ~ a //Au ,~~ a ~"~ `~_•~ ~+,~~ .~_ i 7 ~ Z~J _ l ftl~ ''~ 5~y ~ ~b`~ ~~~Ve oY I~~ , I o~ ' - Ilry C^ A L 1 i red ~0~ n ~4 ~ r7 yea ; y n il'; ~ `` = _;Y. ~~ F ~'%' ~e1 ` I'QT~ ~ i ~~`I v .~d~ ~- iY 1 ifi/9i~ r.// W I~ ~ 'I' !~i y i elf ~'~~ ~\ , ~I'I ~~ ~ _i ~, ~ i ~~ _i' ~•_ ~. I =~ ~ - -- _ . . i ~ .~ _e A 9 ~ aIy 8 ~ 9~ 1 a~l i a ~ ~ F ipa ~ 9~ / . ', ' ~ .9 ~ ~t~ ~`. ~ dA ~ ~~ ~ g '~ q~ a i ~~ a 'A^ I I f- I e i i I _ I I~ I I ~ - I -- I ~~; t ~' ~~ I T a . ~~ - ~ y ^- e`f~1 ~~ :='~ 'y, 1," a _ ;r a ~~;~ a v-- y. F,~; .ry U--_ _ _ ~ c I1I S 1, a ~-H'~ Y u far y, v , ~331I ~'' cl~ I ~~ -_ ~.;.; ,_ -- ~ ~- g Ys~• ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ E ~~~a .~.~ ~~• 4 ~~3 ~~~ ~~y~ t a 9M~ 4 tea a yty `4 ~~ ~~ a~ ~~ ~~a a s^ ~~ ~A to tee s ~° , e• e ` d~ C~ ~~ ,i ~~~ ~ ~~ ~€~ ~~ ~~• ~ i ~~ ~ 04~~ ~ ~~~~II , ii ~ ~i a ~ '~ ~ ~ '' ~ - cif ~ a ~ '~.I _ ~ ~ j~~~~ Eii~ i~ ~~i11 ~I~i~~~l~ ~,:~~~~~ ..~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Z ~~ ~ ~ U ~ I ~ {..... 1 ~ ~~ee ~ 1~t r fn~Y ~ i ~ ~ Pf •~. Ps f~l~Y ~~ In ~ I _i ~~b 1 ~~ I°i I 1^ I• S~Si i• C II4y11 L~ry}{~t~~~pp~~ ~ ~~ I r P~ i~ E iY ilbfsdtYt ~6iii' k L ,• < Ma + i ~ TE T P r _ _ _ - _ _ _ TT-- _11 III ~• ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~q Y t~ II (l J. i ~ &1 i ~ ~~~ ~~ : - ~lf '~ 1~ ~ ti ,F75! x ~ ~ ~_r_ _P dP' I f :I~ ~ P Z '~g U ' P e / a ~ ~3Q ; ~ ~ ~~I Z 0 ~g~~ ~<~ _ QOC~g ~~~ ~V rl w.r~ vw ® ~~~~s~~w~w~wr~iw r~w~ aw ~wr year w.rs~~. warawaw ~aws~.uooar ~wwrwaris wrw~~a~ a~ia+a~ mar ww~urw~ es°~wr~. ~ ~rw wwawr s~iM ® rr~~ ~r+ .saw w~n~ws wr ~ scar =~ ~ wws~ rwu wwa~iw raa oawr Q ~ arr~sa, ~aw~.~~s ~r rw w~~~ ~bs~ 111YbY{w M1MI~a~ INIa MY=I~l~IY1 W V ~I ~YOOa11~~ aster ~11~~oatl rY~oloa w~oooaru w~s~r.r was ~eea.a r~er~w~r msa~ ooa.a~rnar .sus aooas narsw as wwr wow nes~ w~sa~~~s narr~a: e r~~waooaw •~r /~L~~ ~w~ea~~rwuw•a• w•~~w, raw~runa a.war r~arws~our rr~oooo~ wss~st raNM/ga1M oaw.aw~wr 11~~ ~~ ~r11oa~Yla M~A~ ~raaM~ala /1l1/~~Wi~ OM_ar~~oyayF .'~`~IYI ~IM~ LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN cuGU~o~ cn TRIINARK PAdflC FIOMES oho ~na~veu4wm+awa~6ueo»~+ ~~ r • i, ~~ E E , ~ ~;~~~I ~ ~ ~ f3lE , ifiE ! ~~ i 3A iE !, ~!' i ICE' ~ ~ 1 R ~ IEIi~lE~ ~~ ! Eff~~i ~E ! !lililll! ~~ (ii~li i ~ II~f~6i ~ ~Isil ~~ I~i~ ~ ~.~ ~~ ~; ~ ~; ~~ ~~ ~E ~ ~i1 ~E ~~E i~lEi ~E E II ! ~ IEEE ~E iEf ~ , ~;E~!! E ' ~~ ~f ~ ~° ~II~II~si ~! ~~iilll ~! ~191~III~! ~! iflll~~ ~! iliiill~ ~~ l~li ~! ~iilil:~ O ® o m ~ E~ E 0 i~p~ i~Mi xM ~i~'i~~ylnrji]' ~JI~JP ~~ E.,,, ., *p }4 ~ f O l j, ,,,,,., ~ ~ .~ .. g = ~~ ... ~, ~ .. ~~~ ~ '~~~~ . _ ,~ .,o, ~~~~~ .i•.,~ N ~O , '~ ~~° g ~~:.o ~ ik ~ ' if~~d~ tll~~~ ~ I ~''"yo°' i J ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ _ x 3 T ` 3 ~ ~~ ~., z$ a< E ;, . ~ _ 8 ~.-z LL ma! E" ~~ -t i~ ~ ; I@{i~s3! ~~ i ili~~~ ~! i l~IiiHl! ~ lliid ~ ~i ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~'! ~~lill ~~ ~~liliE!! ~! ~!!~I ! ~~ ~ ~~ ilEltl~a ~F ~Itl~f~ ~~ ~ll~,i~lE~ ~~ ~E,I(~i 4 ® ° e _... _~ 3 ~~ i~ll!!~~ ~ li4i ~~ ~~~~ ii a ~~ !I, !i!~ ~~ ' ! ~ ~:lil!!! ~! ~iil~~~ ~~ 1~1i ~I ~ll~ii~~ ® o ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~! 0 D 0 ~~ Q U a o~ Q~i o~ ~So ~~ Zo d<~ o~°~ Y~r ~ oc=ig ~ g LL moZ! E~ ~9 • rsl '~ 1.eceHn A-Sm e-D.m...e>e.u.e c.sr.v_ D-°., V..~Tn. e- r.ds.ma P- C~...STJ. G.SyJWd°.. }.y M-D.m.nM.W IId1...Gay.Dm I. SmSY t.r (`~ `, I BRIDLEWOOD City of Renc6o Cucemonge Ta.uk P.c~hc H.... plan lA T. P.... b R... el....i.. T..el Y 16115 b lell~ Renr PAia}J/31 VQN mmm mom rue Wxa 1~1~ f~ -tl LeceH^ A-A® 6- O.m....f.e.CJ.~ C-S.w~ D-°., V.~Tir !- Pie. L.sd T. C STJ. G-9.ndWdR.lrTwL H.0.m.u..M.W Rdl+r ..y.Dm I. S®SpTN 1- Md.I Wp.pNh Gw m BRIDLEWOOD Clty o{ Ravc6o Cueemovga T.IS..L P.elh. H.m.. Plan lA i.. RIV61 & L.Ir el... u.. T..ol M IRIIJ lr 16111 LOiI B1YiT1M1 L'COJ .~. mmm m oao rwis vrro l RI ~N Leceen A.Dm....W..d9.h. 6- W.dTn. c. ~r.wTU. 0. eW.q WmdG... !-C uurWJ5r.1.~dGtl P. Dm.x......lld~ro<.iWPs G-A.® H-S®Tr BRIDLEWOOD Clty o{ Rev<6o Cucemovga i.~...4 P.mlm H.... Plev 1B r..a~~~...1 P.... b R... el....i.. T..m w IDIIJ 6 t01H Reer 61SIJAFI IlOLT~ z_ ~_ mmm m a~ rwis w-w .~ a a~~ i `l;~ ~3~~~~~~ v <eucu Lus ~ !- i e p ~ a 6 o 9 ~ z = _ 9 o o u ~ ~ I ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ i U 6 e _ _ O J ~ *H yI , ] 4 y 4 ~ O ~ QU o ~ alb p IL U ' L'I`B d ~ 6~ ~ u o a - o ~ .. ` a • ~~l~zc~z-r F3 v 1`~ ~G"aD 0 J • V m11 1~ Y a IeceHa A. WdTie. e. mtiwmac.~ c.r s.d.sa.e o-~..wm e-c w.rsr.us.a.,s e- na...u..lr.o....~.yn~ c. a~v~ n. s.® 1. S.®Lr 1- 0.n+wrrr BRIDLEWOOD Cny el Reoe6o Cocemoogn ia...k P..tlm H.... Plev 1C e.....~.. e...k.... e....ba... el....... T..m •1811)b161H M~FIAII vca~ ~~ mmm vn o.om rus vwa ~~ ~~ Lecenn A. W.dT.` e-dm-.w.dca._ c-r %d.sw o-rmwwTU. e. c w.asw..as~a.e e- ~w.w.is~~c-.o-o.. c. e.av~ n. s.® i. 1®Tir ~- 0..riwma~w V Y BRIDLEWOOD City ok ReecLo Cucamonga Lisa.4 P.alic H.... Plen 1C e........ e...4.... Rie6~0•L.1. el... u.. T..e~ R 16111 b 10114 618NMJ VfQJ m orm m oa. rue vnro l~J ~` rt 1eceHn A.C STb E-R~u..WJA~r C-wdlr D-6elV~ !- PwAV~T~r !- Sn® C. WdT.` H. DOU..M.W IIA V~+e•Des 1. 4..dWdR.F.Tb 1- 6~u•.Wd PaNI./CaLL R-Q.~dWwNlgCr BRIDLEWOOD City o{ Renc6o Cucemonge Ta...k P.mim H.m.. Pleas 1D Ad.k. P...r b Ro. ei...u.. i...r w 1611! b' 16111 81~NNJ I.r~a __ moan m ooe M i ~~ LeceHu A-C Std. D. Dm.u.. Wd9mr C- WJM1. D-6dV~ e-•-.vet.. P- S® G- WJfir H. De W......PdL~C~.e.11. 1- S...IWm1141..T.M1 R-Qu..IW^d.lsl~w m' Y AIg6t ~A~ ~f r y~ II~~~'d ^ Left a S , 1 BRIDLEWOOD Cily of ReDC6o Cueemoege Tnss.k P.cHlc H.... Plao 1D Adok. R~D61 b Ldl Pl..a m. Tuel f 18111 CY 161U a+ivr+Ata VC4J ~` omm mauve •,. v.wa ~~ • I.ecee+u A-SSm e-ri.m.u..wmas.~. c-s~v~ D- ° • V~T.s e- cm..sTU. P- 9ydW..d FJrTW. C. D.mm..M.W ld1~C..yDm M-S®Sll T.r ^w~ l ''I^^ vl BRIDLEWOOD CIly oI Reecho Cucemoee Ta se.k P.eJm H.m.. Plne 2A T.. P.oa rr a.., e1...,,.. Tu.l .1 1611} ~ 16111 en~aw VOOJ mourn m c~us v~+a ~~ ~~ Lecenn A-e® e- D.m.n..Wd4.x. C-LsV~ D-°., V~Tn. G-(sewSTJ. G- anJWm114Wi.M1 G. Dm.u.. W i.IM11ro~e.Dm H-A.®S~GTn. q~ `^ M' Y s RtBht BRIDLEWOOD Cl/y of RevcLo Cucemovge r.~m..t e..~l~~ n.... Plev 2A i.. Ria6. & L.1. el...u.. r...~ n leas ~ mug s Le[t `J a~~ ~r mnm m ..vm rwu v.+ra `_ x -~ o~ • IeceNu A. D.e.u..W.dS..r D- W~id C-Cm...MiJ. D-6Yh.Wm1U... !. C~eae.WeedS..4wdSdse !- 6.su..IKIIIA+vI'~wLbs G.Sm N-1.®L~. I- D.m.u..V... 1- WdIW`e M~ l \~ QJ J BRIDLEWOOD Gty of Rancho Cucamonga ia..h P..tlm Nae... Plan 2B r..alll...l P...e o- a... el...ua. i..o. # 1611! it 16111 6A4FNAN I.rw n~~- ~~~ mnm w awe a.•"V+wa ~~ ~ -~ ~~ LeceHn A-Dm.u.WaedS.p B- WmdTp C.CmriL.TJ. D. B.Y..r Wmdfd... e- ~.w.wmas.m.ds.4.t P- 4m.u..M.Wlld1-.s~wDm C-S.® H.ymTp I- Dm.u..Vp 1. WmdRaWt Vm l C`~` V Right BRIDLEWOOD City o~ RavcLo Cucamovge iaea.4 P.cl^0 HO... Plev 2B Te.dw0u1 RIA61 lY L.II el...u0a 7..01 i 18113 & IBII~ B144T1NJ O VCL1J --~ mrtm mam rue v..n • J • ~~ N.) s s ~ecesn A. Wmdi.` e. w~arr C-~u..bd WdPd U.C 14~iA. C-f .s.WmdS..LJSdy !. Umu..MN R-0... ~•wlb. G-AaV~ M-Sr® 1- 5~.®f~r 1. W~IAa4y A- WJe..L ~/ o~ Y BRIDLEWOOD CIly o! Ileoc),o Cocemooa T,w..4 P.cilm H.v.. Plee 2C e».. u.. e.,m4.... e....aa...el....... T...lawus~mw 4\~NN a I.nt+ mnm m o,oa r.,u vrwo ni -~ w~ a rM` 1 W d LeceHa A- W.dLr e-wdrr C- D.m•... R.rd W.d P..l n-~..MTb !-C eswdSN..d Siy !- 0.su.l41MY+.C~.MLIs G-eNV~ e-e® 1- S.oLr 1- WdIWI.. R-Wd° BRIDLEWOOD Clty of Renc6o Cucamov8 L~...4 P.ci lic Hos.. Plev 2C e........ e...k.... R.A41 b L.LI el...uo. i..m R IeIIJ b 10114 Left MBTIAFI L'CUt mrtm m woe LVS Vfrt-0 r ~~ I.eceHn A-S® e. s.mu. c-a0...wmas.r o.ra~.n..ru. e- awwmaP.4.um r. wmdw.r C- WJPr H. Pm.u..IWIMLLV C~M~ a 1 W BRIDLEWOOD Ciky of Reae6o Cucemove Tnso4 P..Ji. H.... Plea 2E Me. ~.... P...~ & R... el... u.. Rear Tu.~ • IEI13 & 10111 R19NAN 1/CO+ emm moeve ... v.na M ~~ ~~ /~ `• LeceNn A-Sm e-s.®sr c. oe_y..wmas... o-c ti.ry G- 4yJ Wdlldrrd L WJIWy C-WJ M1J M-~....Me~~..•ne BRIDLEWOOD City of Rancho Cucamouge nls..t P.aL. n.... Plan 2E M......y R.e61 N L.11 el...l... r...l Is IEID tr 18111 B1ffiJ/Jl mmm i'w1! Vli4 i -- ~ ~d ~~ 5~ ~eceNu A-bm e-Tbu..PnenCdu. C-S.~V~ O.6NV~Tb e- e~»s.....a e. ~e...sru. G.9...IWdR.LL.TW. X.I4m.n..M.W hIl..G.y.M 1- A.®T.s 1- WmdPa R-OOU..W.e.pl.l.s L. 4~....Sn®CdJ M-D.mw..W~a .. V M BR[DLEWOOD Cuy ei RaacLo Cucemov~ L...h P.mim Ho... Plen 3A t. e..a rr a.., el..al.. u.~l s talu rr mug en~ranu 0 vcw mem mam sine v.-rn fi J~ LeceNa A-S® D-o.e..u..P..v.cr.e C-S..V~ o. D~4V~rT.d c- n.e..x.~a !- Ca~.STJ. C- 9yf WmdIIJi.TW M-Om.u..lWkYVCabUes I- Sw®Tn. 1- Wd~d R.4~.x..WA.pN 6s L. Omu..S®Cd.l M.R .u..Wml~u. pp~ l~ M `1 `~ BRIDLEWOOD City o[ Rnvc6o Cueemouge T.L..4 P.<Jm H.... PIDV 3A L. RIe61 b L.II El...u.. i..<. #'16113bIDII1 M~TNN WIJ mrtm v+ewno i -Ex~acs-.cis-~- ~-~a ~ m O o ~ _ _ ~ o e 6 ~ a ~ I d ~ ~ ~~ 3 '~ ~ ~ U ~ ~' ~ I~~ q '~' ~ I~ a l s .,a~ i'il QU o ` ' °` a~~b = ~~ ~4~ e ~~~ ~ ~~~~ m °o a ~ ~ s dJ a ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ y V M~ 1 " r1 ~/" LeceNn •.o~...w.rs.m e-wmau. C-Cm...IL~ib D. ed... Wmd CJ... !- (rum. W.dSrJ.~ISWy P. Dmwrv.M.W RdL..(..y D.s C-Sw® X-SoTn. 1- Dm.mV~i J- Dm.x.. WmdPaLll./GLL K.DOU..WJn ... L-... V. BRIDLEWOOD City of Rene6o Cueemong LL..L P.otlm He... Plev 3B i..dw...l Rid6J (r L.11 el...u.. T...1 Y 1DIIJ tr 16111 MBTNN 0 lI0.Ta ~r...y mmm m ww. rwmV. •ra N~ o~ • • PeceNa •-wmaur e-w.aPa C-Dmu..Rw.dWd P...l D-Cs.r1WTJ. e- ~.eev.w~s..i..asaw P. D.m.e..e4.inm...~w.D° c-niv~ n-ekav_u. ~. sm J- S.®Tn. F- WmdR.Jtie L-C uaSi~d.~41 l rM~' VV J BRIDLEWOOD Cily o~ Rnac6o Cucemoege i.~...4 Psctllc Ho... Plea x E..o. u.. Po.e6.... Pm.~ b R... lL.euov u..~ x ~eu~ b ~DU+ e~~aw ~~ ma.m move scue vnra (~ N~ ~~ p~ {' mJ W keceNo A-WmdT.r 0- WmdPr C-Dm....R..dW.dPd D-C MN. !-[~.rtuvW~S~dm.d3WM P- 0.m.emMwJM~-wC~tl~Des M- ° • V~Dr 1- Ss®Dr R- WmdRW.. L- C~.Mn4S0y1. SL! BRIDLEWOOD Ctly of Revc6o Cuoemove Li.uk Pemllc Mom.. Pinv 3C e...al.. P...k.... alekl a 1..11 el...u.. T..m +!' 16111 tr 16111 9Ah4HM1 vcn~ mmm an o~m rue vPwa • ! i • ~NN N~ V M 1 LeceHu A.f STb 0- Dm.u..wJ9... c. wmar.. D-Gave e. Gav~u. r- s... c. wmar,. n-D..........,wda..~.e.m i- s...awmee.v.rm 1. ~....wmdrrw./^ . , R- o.m....o.V~ BR[DLEWOOD Cily oI Revc6o Cvicemovg Lr~..b P.ahe H.... Plev 3D Adob. P...r b R... el...u.v i...r k IOIIJ b 10114 811W V1 VGCN ~~eab m owe m rise Vr•rn • ~1~t'~-~~"' p ro _ eaaasa Q 0 e u saa:afi a 3 c ...o~n- ° cm 0 ~b Z d~~ Z Y W U o c o o U c .f rt g v ~ ~'~~ 5 F j ~ e # j ~~ ^ ~ ~om~ ~ C ~ o ~ fA 'a " a ~d 0 Q~ a -_ '~ F iE ~ _ ~_ ~ -_ € E ~ ; i~ __ ~~ o' - 6 D~~-~i ,~ ~w~ 0 a m 0 1 nl cr :~ -I BRIDLEWOOD Gty of Rancho Cuce monga T.~...k P..Jm H.... Plae 2 Te.e•1 1D00.L B•.~e• L648 .t 1 B. d..o.q U Bab L.lu LIb...q T...q K 1811) ff 10111 61i@JNJ VCOJ ~mm ___ Sep eaa s=~- ena ema m o.ne AA12 Vf•I4 i • s • • ~~ ~~ N~ e0. ~' BRIDLEWOOD Clay ul Raec6o Cucnmoug Trime.k Pectlm TIo... Plao 2 i..~i k 16113 & 16111 6\ffiYN 114T1 ) m m 99p eaw mu yyl, ynw ° o m . eaaasa Q o ° 0 6oa::: ~ a .. m~ a .~ ~ u 1^OF~~ ~ p R it7 . ~ °~. ~ . e= V o U a ° ..~ ~~ I ~ Q ~ r~Om.,~ ~. a u e - ~ 07 e a .. a ~o~ G3 Qw Y 0 m 0 0 ~' 0 P ~~-y~ i lei ~I m 0 0 ~d d~ ~! o' • ~^ ,Mn~ ~~ BRIDLEWOOD Gly of Reeo6e Cecemoege Tn...k Pacil~c Ila... Plee 3 T.em x IfiID (f 161H 614iFW~ I/@J ~mm _ vw _ ~ ~ ena -~ emw sn wwe vu w-ra DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7 00 p m Donald Granger February 28, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, TIME EXTENSION AND AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P - A request for a time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map for the development of 21 single-family lots on 15 15 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue - APN 0225-131-16 Related file Development Revew DRC2005-00401 The requested amendment involves minor adtustments to street alignments for the purpose of increase lot depth to 200 feet in compliance with current City standard while maintaining the same number of lots Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Design Parameters The 15 15 acres of land is located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wtlson Avenue The protect site is roughly rectangular m shape North and east of the site is undeveloped land, Etiwanda Creek Park is located south of the site, and Fire Station #176 and single-family homes are located to the west A Community Trail is regwred along the east property line Local Feeder Trails are required for access to the rear of each lot The protect site is undeveloped with no existing structures The applicant is requesting a time extension for a previously approved subdivision Since the subdivision was first approved in June of 2002, the Development Standards for lot depths m the Very Low Residential District has increased from 150 feet to 200 feet The applicant has modified the layout of the subdivision to meet the 200-foot lot depth regwrement, and has also adtusted the local trails to have a 15-foot wide equestrian easement with a separate 3-foot drainage easement Both of these minor modifications are enhancements to the proposed subdivsion and enable the subdvision to meet current Development Standards Development of the site with single-family homes will follow shortly as the applicant has submitted a Development Review DRC2005-00401 application for single-family homes that is presently going through the City's review process Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues None -The applicant has resolved all Mator issues with staff Secondary Issues None -The applicant has resolved all Secondary issues with staff Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion Decoratroe perimeter walls shall be provided along the boundaries of the tract and along streets The perimeter wall along East Avenue shall comply with the required design treatment per Etiwanda Speafic Plan Figure 5-28A that includes the following components stucco wall, aver rock ptlasters with ball finials, and aver rock raised planters • D~ DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTTi6114 -TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P February 28, 2006 Page 2 2 Perimeter walls shall be at the top of the slope, with a 2-foot bench Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the time extension and amended the map for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Donald Granger The Committee approved the protect as presented ~x~~-~- ~, N- ~ ~ ~~~~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 30 p m Donald Granger March 14, 2006 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00401 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P' -The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for 21 single-family lots on 15 15 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue - APN 0225-131-16 Related files Preliminary Review DRC2004-00466 and Tentatroe Tract Map SUBTT16114 Design Parameters The 15 15 acres of land is located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue The protect site is rectangular in shape Etiwanda Creek Park is located south of the site Fire Station #176 and single-family homes are located to the west, east of the site is undeveloped land (Flood Control), and north of the site is undeveloped land that is zoned Neighborhood Commeraal and Very Low Residential The protect site is undeveloped with no existing structures The developer has successfully plotted all corrals to meet the 70-foot radws regwrement from all adtacent dwelling units The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on August 24, 2005, at Summit Intermediate School No residents attended The applicant is proposing three house plans for the protect designed to meet the requirements of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan Under the Etiwanda Specific Plan, this protect is developed under the Basic Development Standards and no specific architectural style is regwred, however, the protect must meet the design goals of the Etiwanda Specific Plan The applicant has been working ddigentiy to resolve the design issues that had been identified by staff during the review process The proposed protect consists of three floor plans with 4 architectural styles that range in square footage from 3,878 to 5,078 square feet All of the proposed architectural styles are appropriate to the goals and obtectives of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, incorporating traditional elements with a rural emphasis The applicant has made good uses of porches, traditional materials, and variation in the roof planes A total of five elevations are proposed, and include Tuscan, Traditional, Executive Farmhouse, Adobe, and Monterey design themes All plans have articulation in the footprints and the wall planes, thereby, avoiding "box on box" budding forms All plans have been designed with decorative driveways Most plans have been designed with front porches, which is a design goal of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan Plan 1 is a single-story and has been plotted on three lots (14 percent of the subdivsion), thereby, meeting the targeted goal of 10 to 20 percent single-story product mix There are four corner lots in the subdivsion, and three of them have been plotted with the single-story product (75 percent of the subdivision), which is also a design goal of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00401 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P March 14, 2006 . Page 2 1 The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve all Mator Issues Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 In order to create greater variation in the streetscape, revise the house plottings to have substantial variation of +/- 5 feet and plot additional houses skewed to the street at a discernible angle 2 All tract perimeters shall be solid block walls (not open tubular steel fence as proposed) to enhance fire protection because of the location of tract within a high fire hazard area The wall may be located along the inside edge of the trail easement 3 Provide a minimum 5-foot setback to the wall behind the sidewalk (see Lot 1) Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion 1 The perimeter wall along East Avenue shall comply with the regwred design treatment per Etiwanda Specific Plan Figure 5-28A and include the following components stucco wall, river rock pilasters with ball finials, and rroer rock raised planters • 2 River rock shall be real, or native fieldstone may be used Stone veneers are not permitted 3 Provide decorative pavement on driveways Decorative driveways shall have variation throughout the subdivision 4 Access gates to rear yards should be constructed of a material more durable than wood Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that, with Secondary Issues addressed to the satisfaction of the Design Review Committee, the Committee recommend approval to the Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Donald Granger The applicant presented a revised Site Plan replotting as suggested by staff The Committee recommended approval of the sub/ect to enhance the left side elevation of Plan 1A Tuscan 5-1- p~~-~!~ ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) ary of Rancno Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink Use fhe tab key to move Irom one 1(ne to the next line ) Planning Onntron (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Application Number for the pro/ect to which this form pertains SUBTT16114 Pro/ect Trtle Bndlewootl Name & Address o/pro)ect owner(s) Trlmark Paafic -Rancho Cucamonga, LLC 3400 Central Avenue, Suite #145, Rlverslde, ca 92506 Name & Address of developer orpro)ect sponsor "Same as above" Contact Person & Address Derek Hanson Senior Pro(ect Manager Trlmark Paclflc Homes, L P 3400 Central Avenue, Suite #145, Rlverslde, Ca 92506 Name 8 Address orperson preparing this (orm (i(different from above) "Same as above" Telephone Number (951) 369-1071 Part I Initial Stu - 16114 Form doc Page 1 of 10 P ~ ~ J~O Created on 2/142005 10 00 00 AM • INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is the responsibility ofthe applicant to ensure tnat the application is complete at the time of submittal, City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing m(ormation •Informabon indicated by an asterisk (') is not required oI nonconstruction CUP's unless ofherwise requested by staff '1) Prowde a full scale (8-1/2 x f 1) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the prolect site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Prowde a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the noRh, south, east and west, wews into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representahve views of sign cant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Pro/ect Locabon (describe) yyllson Avenue 8 East Avenue Rancho Cucamonga 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary) 0225-131-16 '5) Gross Site Area (adsq tt) 15 15 Acres Gross 1523 564 sq ft `5) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets 6 proposed ded~cabons) 12 Fro • 7) Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change whrch would effect the pro/ect ste (attach addibonal sheet it necessary) There is no general plan amendment or zone change for this site 8) Include a description o/all permits whrch will be necessary tram the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to /ully implement the prolect Improvement permits for grading water storm drain street Improvements, Building permits for 21 houses, wall permits and permits for landscaping including front yards and perimeter landscapin Since there are no federally or state listed species on the prolect site, there is no requirment for'Take" permits from U s fish and Wildlife Service or California Dept of Flsh and Game Additionally, there are no waters of the U S or waters of the state on the prolect site and, therefore no wetland permits are needed A storm drain will exit the site to the east and discharge into a San Bernardino County Flood Control Facility The Storm drain has been designed not to impact waters of the U S or waters of the State A letter confirming no impacts will occur to waters of the U S has been acquired from the US Army Corps We expect CDFG to issue a similar soon regarding the lack of impacts to waters or the state We are also coordinating with San Bernardino County Flood Control to ensure storm water discharge will not affect a conservation easement created to protect the sensitive Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub habitiat that the County has placed over the Flood control facility . 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as d exists before the prolect including information on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use o/the structures Attach photographs o/ signdicant features described In addition, cde all sources of m(ormation p e ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) Part I Initial Study - 16'114 Form doc Page 2 of 10 1 ~ CI Created on 2/14/2005 10 00 OD AM See attached sheet labeled Question #9 for response • f0) Descnbe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Cite all sources o/ in/omration (books, published . repoRs and oral history) Tract 16114 has been undeveloped land since at least 1938 The eastern portion of the tract was part of an orchid from 1938 to 1960 The report did not specify was type of orchid was being grown Information was obtained from Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for Tentative Tracts 16113 and 16114 by LFR Levine -Fricke, dated October 23, 2003 i l) Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (airoraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses None 12) Describe the proposed pro/ect in detail This should provide an adequate description o/the site in terms oI ultimate use that will result from the proposed prolect Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) i/necessary The protect consists of 21 equestrian/estate lots (minimum size 20 00 sq ft) connected with community and private horse trails The homes are large single family detached homes between 3885 - 5112 square . feet There will be two construction phases for the housing phase of the protect The intract infrastructure Part I Initial Study - 16114 Form doc Page 3 of 10~~ Created on 2/14/2005 10 00 00 AM wdl be bwlt in the first phase There wdl be a 48-Inch RCP storm dram pipe constructed from. the southeast corner of the tract approximately 950 feet eastward to the San Bernardino Flood Control Basin . There will be a 12' wide paved access road for SB Flood control to use to service the manholes for the storm drain This road will extend 600 feet from the western point of the pipe line There area to be disturb by the installation of this pipe is approximately 12 - 15 feet It will be 15 feet were the pavement is installed and 12 feet or less through the balance of the pipe J2r Describe the sunounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commemial, etc J, intensity o(land use (one-(amity, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) Surrounding land uses including open space to the north ,open space followed by residential development to the east, Etiwanda Creek Park and Summit Avenue School to the south, and construction of residential development followed by existing residential development to the west 14) Wdl the proposed pro/act change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/ect~ No 15) indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, mcludmg source and amount How will these noise levels aNect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods o/soundproofing are proposed Grading and street improvement operation -Short Term Home Building Operation -Short Term '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees There are no trees locate on the subject property 17) Indicate any bodies of water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) mto whwh the site drams Part I Initial Study - 16114 Form doc Page 4 of 10 _ Created on 2/14/2005 10 00 00 AM ~~~ Etlwanda Drainage Area 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage eshmates) For /urther clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Dlstnct at 987-2591 a Resldenhal (gal/day) 705 00 Peak use (gaUDayJ 1.410 00 b CommeroraUlnd (gaUday/acJ Peak use (gaUmm/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ®Sept~c Tank ^ Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests I(dlscharge to a sanitary sewage system /s proposed mdlcate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A /or usage eshmates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Dtstnct at 987-2591 a Resldenhal (gal/day) b CommerolaUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resldenttal units 21 Detached (mdlcate range o/parcel srzes, mmtmum lot s/ze and maximum lot size 20,000 - 30,000 Attached (mdlcate whether units are rental or for sale undsJ 21) Anticipated range o/sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $850,000 00 to $1.000.000 00 Rent (permonth) $ to $ 22) Speafy number o/ bedrooms by unit type Plan #1 - 3885 sq ft single story detached home with 4 bedrooms Plan #2 - 4587 sq ft two story detached home with 5 bedrooms Plan #3 - 5112 sq ft two story detached home with 5 bedrooms 23) Indicate anhapated household s¢e by and type i r1 LJ Part I Initial Study - 16114 Form doc Page 5 of 10, ~S, , I Created on 2/14/2005 10 00 00 AM 2 to 5 people per household on average • Part I Initial Study - 16114 Form doc Page 6 of 10 Created on 2/14/2005 10 00 00 AM ~G J-~` 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wtl/ be restdmg wilhtn the pro/ect Contact the appropriate School Dtstncts as shown to Attachment 8 a Elementary 3939 = 8 2719 b JumorHtgh 9 •~~BB ' ~'~v~ibr c Senior Mgh COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and major function(s) o/ commemta/, mdustnal or mstttuttonal uses 26) Total floor area of commerctal, mdustnal, or tnshtubonal uses by type 27) Indicate hours of operation 28J Number of employees Total Maxlmum Shift Time of Maxlmum Shttt 29) Provide breakdown of anhctpatedlob classthcahons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an tnd~cahon of the rate of titre for each classtf~catton (attach additional sheet tI necessary) 30) Estimation o/the number of workers to be hued that currently reside to the Cily '31) For commerctal and mdustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount o(atr pollution emissions (Data should he ven/~ed through the South Coast Au Quality Management Otstnct, at (818) 572-6283) Part I Initial Study - 16114 Form doc Page 7 of 10 Created on 2/14/2005 10 00 00 AM Q ~~ ~O • ALL PROJECTS 32J Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the proyect been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed proyect~ If so, please indicate their response Yes All can serve the protect 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matena/s~ Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, /uels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known As per the Environmental Site assessment Phase #1 There was no known history of any hazardous wastes material PCB's fuels underground storage tanks 34) Will the proposed proyect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed abovev If yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans 1 hereby certi/y that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro/ect to the best o(my ability, that the !acts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best o(my knowledge and belie/ I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/Rancho Cucamonga Date 2/10/05 Part I Initial Study- 16114 Form doc 'r Signature ~ ~~~~ .c~_ Title Seinor Protect Manager Page 8 of 10, ~~^ Created on 2/14/2005 10 00 00 AM Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 SCALE 1'=250' /~ z ~\ IKAGI Io1 I't ~ SITE BOUNDARY 3. Tract 16114 looking northeast - - -- i~ Site Photographs D~~-~~ CiJ[-U~.~'„'- ~ LF LEVINE•PRICKE 4 Tract 16114 looking north Site Photographs ~j D [~ T ~~ L~~ t•F~CKE t~:IZ-Q~6~'S-: . 1 Intersection of East Avenue and Twenty-third Street looking nortneasr 2. Twenty-third Street looking east u C~ J ~~. ~ ai `~Cr. n' _pAD _, O 26 / ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~lr ~ / (\\\(\1~1Q(1(/ ''/''~ Sao ~ " ~~ r ~' ~ ~rl f( ~' ~r~ u l 2 / l vY ~ ~ ° ~ ,. ~ ~ `, , - ~ ~( ~1 ~ it rn _ _~i ti U. ~ --:il~c~~~~~1~ ~r ~~/=~ ~' =-__ iDaY ` Canv,on~~ ` ~- , _ ~ JJ ~ I %~." `~f°~-_~ $IdtlOn _' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ \-_ ~` /~ `s\O~' I i ~) ' ~. N16 -~i~\~ ~ii~'1f1~~L/~I ~~ ~it \~'S. ;-. ~:~ .~ `~~! Y L IICf \ I ` ~ ~ _ \ ~ / .~ - --~ ` vl ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~I \ I ~ ' N'ell~n ~ \I h~ ~ _ "' _ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 2 / u ~' - / __- _ _ <. . _ __ __-__~___ _ e_. __ __ _ _ __ ________ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~~i- / ~\ v ^ /`gyp IT \ 0 ~ ~ ~ ._~ ~e00 ~ " / l ! i / _/ I I 2006 „~~`- ~ '~% I --. I ' \ ~' /y / ' _ ~- ~- / -v o e ~ ~~ i II ~i N~ \ / ~ ., / 5o ~ _ 11 ~~ _ 1J \ / ~ - _ ____ __ __-______ ___ __-__ _____ I I ` ~___-_____ __~_==c _°______-_~ ..E _ ~_~-.~_- -- .I r_~ __ ' ,. - '~ ____________ - -- _ = _ ~ _ I . _, . -- T` ____ ___~ _t =_ __ rya _~______ il , ~. •___l __ ______ _ _______ _ __ I _ a fi ~ _ / / ~ I 1 r6LJ 11 F _ ~ I i ~ I ~ p i e5chml P / ~, I I Ai ~ MIT 'I' ' ~ ~ ' ~ 27 I s c..1129~v-°__e qc_1==== 1 --- ~ 153G ~ 2$ ~ ~ 1b05 ~ " -' I I II II II ¢ -'' .. 'I i / =• fJ - \t I r II -~~ II p ~ o - II .I ~- ~„ 3 / it / ~ _-_ I =='=_ ~ Yi I F ~ _ ~' o II _ w j /' ~ ( ii ii y--~ ~ I _ 30 _ ~ aging ~ ~ Sraoon ~ ,,, C7~ f i ~~:: .,.OC ~ rau (~ II ~ " ~ II x- ~ ~ I I~ Iwantla Flre. ~ ~ Station ~r h w ~ ~ i '~_" _ I J ~ ~ I L ~ ' i w L i I - 33 •. Q I I ~ _____ r359 ( ~ . E. a.. ~ ~ \` 32' 30• i I a51 ~ °D2uum t ...__------ ,~(H..SI_~JGHWAYS AND ROADS Intemate D~~~ ~/ Primary highway CA n i~k32 a~81 10' 3T~ 379 ai7goaom ry ~ mod' m o~ ~ ~N ~_o. - c ~~~ ~ ~~O c ~~ 0 -~ OJ ~~~ N ~~ .+ U, -34°07'30' 117° 30' REFERENT Question 9 The project site is located m Rancho Cucamonga, California and ties on the former • floodplain of Etiwanda Creek It is bounded on the north by Wilson Avenue, on the east by East Etiwanda Creek, on the south by Etiwanda Creek P azk, and on the west by East Avenue. The site is depicted in Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 6 West on the Cucamonga Peak U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7 5 minute topographic quadrangle (Exhibits 1 and 2) The topography of the site is gently sloping from northwest to southeast. There aze no blue line streams depicted on the USGS topographic quadrangle within the project site Soils onsite are characterized as Tu~unga gravelly loamy sand (Soil Conservation Service 1980). The project site is heavily disturbed. Several dirt roads and a flood control berm bisect the project site Heavy off=road vehicle (ORV) use and disking for weed abatement is apparent on most of the property Many lazge eucalyptus Vees have been dumped on the project site. Construction is currently ongoing immediately adjacent to the project site, on the west of East Avenue, resulting in some additional disturbance to the western portion of the site. The vegetation consists of non-native gassland and ruderal species as well as remnant and emergent alluvial fan scrub Alluvial fan scrub is found within a wash area east of the proposed development Plant species within the project site included weedy grasses • such as slender wild oats (Avena barbata) and biomes (Bromus sp ), herbaceous annuals such asred-stemmed filaree (Erod~um crcutarium) and short-podded mustazd (Htrschfeld:a rncana), and remnant alluvial fan scrub such as buckwheat (Errogonum jasciculatum), scalebroom (Lepidospartum squamatum), and white sage (Salvia ap:ana) Due to the lack of viable habitat, wildlife activity was low The wildlife species observed onsite include the Cahfomia towhee (Pipilo crissalis), northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), and song sparrow (Melosp:za melodia) A row of eucalyptus trees is located along the southern property boundary providing suitable nesting habitat Los Angeles pocket mouse and northwestern San Diego pocket mouse, which occur m the vicnity, are not federally or state listed but are considered sensitive species by the Department of Fish and Game Focused surveys for both SBICR and coastal Cahfomia gnatcatcher were negative Due to the increasingly disturbed nature of the site, none of the above listed species, including SBKR and California gnatcatcher, are expected to occur within the project site Slender-homed spmeflower and San Diego homed lizard have the potential to occur withun the alluvial fan sage scrub wash community located to the east of the proposed development but not within the project site itself There aze no native habitats remauung on Tract 161]4 and no evidence of blue tine streams, waters of the U S., or waters of the state Although the project site is within Cntical Habitat for San Bernardino kangaroo rat, there is no remaining habitat that could support this species Further, there are no federal pennittmg issues under Section 404 of u D~~--~. the Clean Water Act that would require consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Reference: Michael Brandman Associates, December 2004, Updated Biological Resources Repor[ for Tract 16114 located m Rancho Cucamonga, Cahforma C J • ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1 Prolect File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 2 Related Fdes• None 3. Description of Pratect• TIME EXTENSION, AND AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 -TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P - A request for a time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map for the development of 21 single-family lots on 15 15 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue The requested amendment involves minor adiustments to street alignments for the purpose of increased lot depth to 200 feet in compliance with current City standards while maintaining the same number of lots - APN 0225-131-16 Related File Development Review DRC2005-00401 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00401 -TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 21 single-family lots on 15 15 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue - APN 0225-131-16 Related Files Preliminary Review DRC2004-00466 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Trimark Pacific Homes 3400 Central Avenue, Suite 145 Riverside, CA 92506 5 General Plan Designation• Very Low Residential (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan 6 Zoning: Very Low Residential (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Settmg• The 15 15 acres of land is located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue The protect site is rectangular in shape Etiwanda Creek Park is located south of the site Single-family homes are located west of East Avenue, east of the site is undeveloped land, and north of the site (approximately 700 feet south of Wilson Avenue) is undeveloped land The protect site is undeveloped with no existing structures 8 Lead Agency Name and Address• City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number Donald Granger Assoaate Planner (909) 477-2750 10 Other agencies whose approval is regwred None • C J D~~~ Initial Study for Time Extension for Tentative Tract SUBTT16114 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less-Than-Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics (/) Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality t) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Matenals (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population & Housing O Public Services ORecreation O Transportationlfraffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance On the basis of this initial evaluation DETERMINATION (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to^, b~the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared Prepared By CT Date ~ 2-~ °~ p Date ~~~ ~i"" Reviewed By Rev 7/27/04 p ~ ~-~5 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 3 Less Tian Sipn~ficent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PMenLally si0nmcam Wad Mm9aaon 7Tan Sionifican, No ~ eC ncO ~atl ~ eCl ~ aCl EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the prolect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas O O O (~) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (~) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwidings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (~) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (~) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibd III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The 15 15-acre site is located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue and is characterized by vacant land to the north, south, east and west Native California buckwheat dominates most of protect, and evidence of human and mechanized disturbance is visible Etiwanda Creek Park is located further south of the protect site. The casual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is regwred prior to approval City standards regwre the developer to underground the existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility Imes and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of the light fixtures will be shown on the Site Plans which regwre review for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (~) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (~) Williamson Act contract Rev 7/27/04 9~~~-~j~p Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tlme Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 4 • Less ma" 9pruficem Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Goten4atly y,,,,scain wM M~e~~, TTen s~r~~ ~ ~ ~~ .ea ~ ~ ~ c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, O O O (~) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The 15 15-acre site is located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue and is characterized by vacant land to the north, south, east, and west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the Crty Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site 15 15-acre site is located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue and is characterized by vacant land to the north, south, east, and west Native California buckwheat dominates most of project, and evidence of human and mechanized disturbance is visible Etiwanda Creek Park is located further south of the project site The nearest agricultural use is more than 1 mde southwest from the project site Therefore, no adverse impacts are antiapated 3. AIR DUALITY. Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (~) applicable ar quality plan b) Violate any ar quality standard or contribute () (~) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected ar quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (~) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient ar quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () () (~) concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (~) number of people Rev 7/27/04 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 5 ~~ Sip,ul~cem Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Poteirtially 9onmcaa WM euocaaon Than sp~.rwam Ne Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development wtll contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase m emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect ~s consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activties Whde most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain m the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality m the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are regwred to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was Investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air duality Management District (SCA~MD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCA~MD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCA~MD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Rev 7/27/04 ~ c~ y ~g • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 6 Leas man Sipntl¢ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources `°'BOaanr 9pm1¢anl w~" Miapaoon man Sipnihcam No ~ ea Inro tea ~ an ~ act • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional Water t]uality Control Board [RW~CB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PMip) emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMrp emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PMrp would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented . - 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. Rev 7/27/04 ® `~~,~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 7 ~~ m~ sw~~em ~, aaenea~ir wen men Issues and Supporting Information Sources S~On,ficam Mn~~on s~cry~ Ne ~ n ~n<e ~~ ~ en ~ 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to Incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a signficant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the Cdy Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a sigmficant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identdies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facl~ties According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emd toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create sigmficant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mde of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect 4 . a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (~) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat O O U (~) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, polices, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service r1 f•_J Rev 7/27/04 (~ ~ ~- l~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 8 Lass man Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~;ry~ ~ Ma~aon sw ~ N~ ~~a ,ad ~ ac, i c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (~) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery srtes~ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (~) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O O (~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with single-family dwelling units in the surrounding environs, a park and a tumor high school The srte has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV3, and Section 5 3 of the General Pian FEIR, the protect site is within an area of sensitive biological resources As identified in the General Plan Exhibit IV3, the site is located in area that may contain Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Habitat Accordingly, a biological assessment of the site by Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) in December of 2004 was conducted to evaluate the potential of the site to support special-status wildlife species and vegetation including, but not limited to, the following Burrowing Owl, Coastal California Gnatcatcher, San Diego Horned Lizard, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, Slender-Horned Spinefiower, and Johnston's Buckwheat A biologist conducted a literature review and a physical walk of the entve site in order to evaluate the occurrence potential of sensitive biological resources on the protect site Additionally, a focused survey for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat was completed in 2004 The biological assessment report states that the protect site is heavily disturbed Several dirt roads traverse the site, and disang for weed abatement purposes is evident on most of the property The site contains no blue line streams Of all the known sensitwe biological resources known to occur within the region, only two (Los Angeles Pocket Mouse and Northwestern San Diego Pocket Mouse) are known to occur on-site Even though neither of these species is formally listed as threatened or endangered, both species are classified as California Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Game (CAFG) A previous focused survey for the California Gnatcatcher (Impact Sciences, 2001) for the 1515-acre protect area was negative No California Gnatcatchers were recorded on the protect site during the six surveys of the focused survey in 2001 The focused survey further cites that the generally disturbed nature of the site, historic practice of weed abatement, and the proximity of adtacent agriculture have resulted in the absence of suitable habitat for the California Gnatcatcher Because the focused survey for the Gnatcatcher was conducted in 2001, MBA conducted Rev 7/27/04 D ~ ~i Z I Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 9 Lass men $IVn~lICelII Less Issues and Supporting InformaUOn Sources Poteri4allY S~„vrrcem WM Auapason 71ian s~aaoem No i en i yea i ~ subsequent habitat assessments of the protect site in 2003, 2004, and 2005 Further, MBA conducted a final visit to the protect site on August 18, 2005, and found the site to be highly disturbed, and that the protect site does not provide swtable habitat for the California Gnatcatcher, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, and San Diego Horned Lizard The protect wdl necessitate the construction of a 48-inch storm dram line from the southeast corner of lot 13 to a downstream connection point at Banyan Street located southeasterly of the subdivision Since the proposed storm dram line runs through Rroersidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS), a biological resource assessment was conducted in order to survey the site for potential sensitive biological resources. RAFSS is composed of an assortment of drought-deciduous sub-shrubs and large, evergreen wood shrubs that have the ability to exist in periodic and intense episodes of flooding and erosion that occur along alluvial fans Thomas J McGill of Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) walked the proposed route of the storm drain line According to the report by MBA Associates, there are no blue line streams depicted on the USGS topographic quadrangle or federal of state turisdictional features within the proposed route of the stone drain line The reports indicates that because of the maturing nature of the RAFSS habitat and lack of hydrological processes, swtable habitat for potentially occurring special status for sensitive species is not present. The report recommends that pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Calfomia Department of Fish and Game Code (CDFG), removal of any trees, shrubs or any other potentially nesting habitat should not occur during the nesting season (generally February through August) The report recommends that apre-construction survey for nesting birds be done prior any ground disturbing activities If active nests are found, informal consulting with CDFG is recommended If the birds are found to be nesting within 500 feet of the impact area, construction will need to be postponed until it is determined that the nest has successfully fledged young, and it is determined by a qualified ornithologist that the nest is no longer active The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1) Apre-construction survey for nesting birds shall be done prior any ground disturbing activities. If active nests are found, Informal consulting with CDFG Is required. If tfie birds are found to be nesting within 500 feet of the Impact area, construction will need to be postponed until It is determined that the nest has successfully fledged young, and It is determined by a qualified ornithologist that the nest is no longer active. b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts See also a) above c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources See also a) above d) The matonty of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance ~1 L_-~ ~J Rev 7/27/04 _ ~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 10 • Lass Than Sipmficant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pot•nM1•Ily S~Onifican~ WM Am~oaoon ThaA s~fi~ No ~ Inca ~aa I ~ f) The prolect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The prolect site has not been identified as a °Historic Resource" per the standards of . Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological saes or resources recorded on the prolect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique . prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the Rev 7/27/04 (~ c~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 11 Less marl 9pmficam Less Po,erNally WM T1ien Issues and Supporting Information Sources SiOnifican, FLaganon aurvfican, ~ _- ...,.,,a ~mna~, Anna project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bemardino County database, no paleontological saes or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-ot-influence, including the prolect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvwm, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last 'Ice Age° and the appearance of modem man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The prolect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (f.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the Interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should Immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation m the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (I e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has already been disrupted by annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No adverse impacts are anticipated • Rev 7/27/04 D ~ ~ 7~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 12 • • Less men Sipreficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources emem~enr Sipn,lcant wen A4upeeon rnen S,Grufitent No 1 Into tail I I ecl 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the protect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involwng~ i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (~) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 n) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (~) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including (/ O O (~) liquefaction iv) Landshdes~ O O O (~) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, O O O (~) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (~) 18-1-B of the Unitonn Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (~) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments• a) No known faults pass through the site and d is not in an Earthquake Faun Zone, nor is d in the Rancho Cucamonga Crry Special Study Zone along the Red HIII Fauft, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes approximately 1 mile northwesterly of the sde, and the Cucamonga Fauft Zone lies approximately 1 6 mile north of the sde These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is approximately 6 5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is approximatety 10 miles northeastery of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Undone Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following Rev 7/27/04 Q ~~=Z~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 13 Less Tl~eri 9pnfrait Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources o ~~;„ Nw~~, s,~ a~ No ~ u~ ~~ ~ ~ fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-signficant levels f) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the agwfer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing agwfer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic umt or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Sod types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial sod deposits These types of sods are not cons+dered to be expansive Sod types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These sods are typically gently sloping, with slopes ranging from 2 to 9 percent Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (~) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school r1 L J • • Rev 7/27/04 P ~~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tlma Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 14 lass man 99mM1Cant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sipnihwnt Wah Mitigation Than Sig^ificant No 1 Inco 2tetl 1 1 act d) Be located on a site which is Included on a list of () () () (~) hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result In a safety hazard for people residing or working In the protect area f) For a prolect within the wcindy of a private airstrip, O O O (~) would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working In the prolect area g) Impair implementation of or physically Intertere with an O O O (~) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (~) loss, injury or death involving wildiand fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wlldlands~ Comments: a) The prolect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed prolect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse Impacts are anticipated c) There are schools Qunior high and elementary) located within 1/4 mile of the project site Typically, single-family dwelling units do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed prolect Is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact Is anticipated Rev 7/27/04 ~ ~',~~7 7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 15 Less 1Ten Sipn~ficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Gotenaally S,p,aficam WM Mmpaeon Then s~on~eoam Ne I tt Inco tail ~ ~ ~+ e) The sde is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not) within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 6 5 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Pian, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fue District in the event of a disaster. Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is regwred to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wddland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire Distract Strategic Plan 2000-2005 The proposed protect site is located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 In 2004, Fire Station 176 became operational, which is located on East Avenue approximately 1/4 mile from the protect site Wdh Station 176 now operational, response times are within target ranges and the consequence of a fire has been substantially reduced 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER DUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge O O O (~) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () (~) () l ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the () () () (`~) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (~) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (~) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substanhally degrade water quahty~ O O O (~) u ~J Rev 7/27/04 p~~ 7~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 16 Less Than SOrvficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotaMnlly 90rvficam WM M,apaaon Then sarvfi~m No ~ n ~rvro ~ ~ ~ n g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (~) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (~) that would impede or redvect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a sigmficant risk of () () () (~) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (~) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water Distract (CVWD) Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction actwty over 1 acre as an industrial activity, regwring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction actmties covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other actmty for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requres all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would speafy Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into recemng waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) To comply with the NPDES, the protect construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Poilut~on Prevention Plan (SW PPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Pian (WQMP) for posi- construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by PHB Associates, that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on- site drainage system BMPS include both structural and non-structural control methods Rev 7/27!04 '~ ~ ~ 7q Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga T,ma Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 17 ye=s ~, Sipnificam less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Po,enluflly &Gnihtenl WM Maigahan Tien 9pivficem r+o I Into teE I I Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be regwred to control additional storm water effluent Construction Act~whes 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction actlvities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing actlvities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there Is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust In order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The use of fossil filters or other drainage filtration systems will used at approved areas as called out on the Erosion Control Plan. 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by PHB Associates to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) The project has been designed to direct storm flows, when possible, to an outlet that drams to a regional drainage facility. 8) Runoff from rooftops will be directed into landscape areas. 9) Landscaping plans shall Include provisions for controlimg and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbic~des. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage Rev 7/27/04 T~ ~{ ~-~ • u Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tama Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 18 ~~ sivmOram Laos Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potennelly SiOnficam wRe uiovenon men aweacem No i en i ea i ~ a and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the Cdy's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will rt interfere with recharge because d is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Pian Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted m the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erasion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and Cdy Engineer pnor to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes m absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new bwidmg and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect wdl not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes m absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new bwidmg and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwldmg Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surtace flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, is regwred to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented Rev 7/27/04 D ~~- ~ I Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 19 Less Tlimi Sipa~ucam Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources so m~ w ~uaa ao ~ Na ~ Inco taa i ~ 10) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall Identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In June 2004. 11) Prior to Issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The protect site is not located wthin a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm dram system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located w~thm a 100-year flood hazard area, according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established commumty~ () () () (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (~) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or miUgabng an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (~) or natural community conservation plan • Rev 7/27/04 P ~~-Oa Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT76114 Page 20 ~ med Sipeufitant Lsss Issues and Supporting Information Sources PMenddlly S,ymndam Wrtd Midpadon Td2n avmmdem Nd i n ~ncd d3,e0 i i ~ Comments• a) The site is located is located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue and is characterized by vacant land to the north, south, east and west Native California buckwheat dominates most of the protect The Etiwanda Creek Park is located further south of the protect site This protect will be of simtlar design and size to the surrounding development to the west The protect will become a part of the larger Etiwanda Community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is Very Low Residential (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any polices for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural Communty Plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Pian Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the protect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (~) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (~) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact ~~ t 1. NOISE. Would the protect result rn a) Exposure of persons to or generabon of noise levels m U (~) O ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of otheragencies~ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (~) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (~) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (~) () ( ) ambient nose levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect Rev 7/27104 p ~ ~-~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 21 Lest/ ma, Sgnficant Less Gotennely With then Issues and Supporting Information Sources sa~nficeet we~n~ sy~fi~t Nn i ect Ireo fed ~ ~ e) For a protect located within an arport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a pnvate airstnp, O O O (~) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments• a) The protect site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at bwld-out The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts b) Single-family dwelling units normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are antiapated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not antiapated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a m. on weekdays, Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Offiaal. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Offtcial. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the tr ns ort of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall a p then be required Rev 7/27/04 Q ~~-~y Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 22 • Lass Than ygruficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotariaallY Sigrufiwitt WAN M,ogeeai Then signesent No I act Iroo ta0 1 ~ 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The prolect is located approximately 6 5 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated • 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (~) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (~) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a) The prolect is located in a predominantly vacant area and will not induce population growth The proposed prolect is within the allowable density range of the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result in substanhal adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facildies, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O (~) b) Police protections O O O (~) c) Schools () () () (~) Rev 7/27/04 p~~ g~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pote,aielly SiOrvficant Wrtfi MiOpasan Than Si0^ificant No I ecl Inw fed I I cY d) Parks O O O (~) e) Other public facddies~ O O O (~) Comments: a) The site, located on the east side of East Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue, would be served by a fire station located approximately)/4 mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located less than 1/4 mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City i i Rev 7/27/04 ~ ~ ~ o Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 24 Leaa mee 9profiran Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenaally 9Groficam WM we,ea~ Then sa~ncem Ne 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (~) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the faality would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or O O O (~) requre the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the enwronment~ Comments• a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located less than 1/4 mile from the protect site. The proposed 21 lot subdivision will ultimately provide 21 single-family dwelling units The 21 lot subdivsion will not cause a substantial or an accelerated deterioration of parks or other recreational facd~ties A standard conddion of approval will require the developer to Pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a)response above • 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in O O O (~) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result m a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle taps, the volume to capacty ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (~) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (~) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () l~) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access O O O (~) f) Result in inadequate parking capacdy~ U O O (~) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) The protect wtll generate 273 average daily vehicle trips (ADTs) according to the City or Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model (assuming 13 ADT per home) As noted m the General Rev ~/2~/04 ~ `~ ~ 8r1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 25 Less Ttlen ' Spnficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenWlly $ign,ficant WM Mn,peoon Tian Sipnficae No 1 Into tetl I I Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in prolect design The prolect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The prolect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect will generate 16 and 21 two-way peak hour trips, respectively, during morning and evening "rush hour", which is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail, therefore, the proposed prolect is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The prolect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials The prolect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 6 5 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The prolect is in an area that is partially developed The prolect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The prolect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The prolect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will be designed to provide access for ail emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated. f) The prolect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The prolect design includes, or the prolect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the pro/ect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (~) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (~) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects Rev 7/27/04 p ~~-~'g • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 26 C J Less man Sipnficant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Po,ene~Y Siprufiwnt wrtn iMepaton Siyvfirant n'om' No I Inm tetl I C I c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (~) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (~) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (~) __ capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (~) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana RWOCB regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered significant d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is 41 7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for protects that exceed the following sizes 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet, 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet, 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms, 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than Rev 7/27/04 ~ ~ `~ Zj q Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 27 Less Then Sigmf¢aM Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potent,ally sgn,n~m WM INegaagn TMn S,gMmam Ho I Ingo tad I ~ 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use protect including one or more of the protects specified above, 7) any other protect that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or grater than the amount of water regwred by a 500-dwelling unit protect, and 8) any protect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system Under SB 221 a Water Supply Assessment is regwred when 1) a protect that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) a protect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more m the number of existing service connections for a public water system, and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision The City has determined that the protect does not meet one of the regwrements, therefore, a Water Supply Assessment is not regwred The protect is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontano, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacty to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (~) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are mdividually () () () (~) limited, but cumulatively considerable (°Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (~) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly r-1 u Rev 7/27/04 P ~ t ~U Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tlma FxtPnsion for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 28 • ~~ ~~ S,prvficem Lana Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenballY $ipnficaM WM MiLgaGOn ihen Sipruficant No I Into led I I acl Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with single-family dwelling units in the surrounding environs, a park and a tumor high school The site has been previously disrupted during annual discmg for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is within an area of sensitive biological resources As identified in the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, the site is located in area that may contain Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Habitat Accordingly, a biological assessment of the site by Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) in December of 2004 was conducted to evaluate the site's potential to support special-status wildlife species and vegetation including, but not limited to, the following Burrowing Owl, Coastal California Gnatcatcher, San Diego Horned Lizard, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, Slender-Homed Spineflower, and Johnston's Buckwheat A biologist conducted a literature review and a physical walk of the entire site in order to evaluate the occurrence potential of sensitive biological resources on the protect site Additionally, a focused survey for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat was completed in 2004 The biological assessment report states that the protect site is heavily disturbed Several dirt roads traverse the site, and discmg for weed abatement purposes is evident on most • of the property The site contains no blue line streams Of all the known sensitive biological resources known to occur within the region, only two (Los Angeles Pocket Mouse and Northwestern San Diego Pocket Mouse) are known to occur on-site Even though neither of these species is formally listed as threatened or endangered, both species are classified as California Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Game (CAFG) A previous focused survey for the California Gnatcatcher (Impact Sciences, 2001) for the 1515 acre protect area was negative No California Gnatcatchers were recorded on the protect site during the six surveys of the focused survey in 2001 The focused survey further cites that the generally disturbed nature of the site, historic practice of weed abatement and the proximity of adtacent agriculture have resulted in the absence of suitable habitat for the California Gnatcatcher Because the focused survey for the Gnatcatcher was conducted in 2001, MBA conducted subsequent habitat assessments of the protect site in 2003, 2004, and 2005 Further, MBA conducted a final visit to the protect site on August 18, 2005, and found the site to be highly disturbed and that the protect site does not provide suitable habitat for the California Gnatcatcher, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, and San Diego Homed Lizard The protect will necessitate the construction of a 48-inch storm drain line from the southeast corner of Lot 13 to a downstream connection point at Banyan Street located southeasterly of the subdivision Since the proposed storm drain line runs through Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS), a biological resources assessment was conducted in order to survey the site for potential sensitive biological resources RAFSS is composed of an assortment of drought-deciduous sub-shrubs and large, evergreen wood shrubs that have the ability to exist in periodic and intense episodes of flooding and erosion that occur along alluvial fans Thomas J McGill of Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) walked the proposed route of the storm drain line According to the report by MBA Associates, there are no blue line streams depicted on the USGS topographic quadrangle • or federal of state turisdictional features within the proposed route of the storm drain line The reports indicates that because of the maturing nature of the RAFSS habitat and lack of hydrological processes, suitable habitat for potentially occurring special status for sensitive species is not present Rev 7/27/04 - D ~~-~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 Page 29 Less men Sipreficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially s,rcrcant With ~e~e~n Tien a„~fi~ant Ne l IrKro t~ 1 ~ The report recommends that pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Game Code (CDFG), removal of any trees, shrubs, or any other potentially nesting habitat should not occur during the nesting season (generally February through August) The report recommends that apre-construction survey for nesting birds be done prior any ground disturbing actvities If active nests are found, informal consulting with CDFG is recommended If the birds are found to be nesting within 500 feet of the impact area, construction will need to be postponed until it is determined that the nest has successfully fledged young, and it is determined by a qualified ornithologist that the nest is no longer active The recommendations of the biologist for conducting pre-construction surveys have been incorporated as mitigation measures m order to ensure that there is no impact b) Ii the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be regwred to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of bwld-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-signficant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or mdvectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from av quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed m an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed m the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Cmc Center Drive (check all that apply) (~) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027 Rev 7/27/04 Certified October 17, 2001) Q ~~-~a- • Initial Study for <Insert Protect Name> City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) (/) Water Quality Management Plan, PHB Assocates (October, 2004) (/) Biological Resources Survey and San Bernardmo Kangaroo Rat Focused Survey, Michael Brandman Associates (December, 2004) (/) Letter from Michael Brandman Associates for Final Site Vint for Tentative Tract 16114 (August, 2005) (/) Biological Assessment for Storm Dram Route from Michael Brandman Associates Tentative Tract 16114 (January, 2006) (/) Special Status Wildlife Species Habitat Based Evaluation Impact Scences (January, 2001) (/) Focused Protocol Survey for Calrfornia Gnatcatcher Impact Sciences (May, 2001) I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature -'v' Pnnt Name and Title ~ A~ti-t ~ t T ~F ~~~-~'3 Date ~ ~'"' Z ~ ~ ~ 'P E e~~ Rev 7/27/04 _ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following MMgated Negative Declaration is being arculated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 and Development Review DRC2005-00401 Public Review Penod Closes: Apnl 26, 2006 Project Name: Project Applicant: Tnmark Paafic Homes Project Location (also see attached map) Located in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Wilson Avenue APN 0225-131-16 Project Description: A request for a time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map and review of building elevations and detailed Site Plan for the development of 21 single-family lots on 15 15 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distnct (1-2 dwelling units per acre) Related File Development Review DRC2005-00401 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is • proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Imtial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477- 2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. Apnl 26. 2006 Date of Determination Adopted By ~ ~ ~-~y RESOLUTION NO 06-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A TIME EXTENSION FOR PREVIOUSLYAPPROVEDTENTATIVETRACT MAP SUBTT16114 AND AMENDING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 TO INCLUDE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO STREET ALIGNMENTS FOR THE PURPOSES OF INCREASING THE LOT DEPTH TO 200 FEET IN COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT CITY STANDARDS, WHILE MAINTAINING THE SAME NUMBER OF LOTS AND MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THEREOF, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 21 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON 15.15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 TO 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET SOUTH OF W ILSON AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0225-131-16. A Rentals 1 Trimark Pacific Homes, L.P filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2 On June 27, 2001, this Commission adopted its Resolution No 01-70 thereby approving the application subfect to specific conditions and time limits 3 On April 26, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows- 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearng on Apnl 26, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114, with the minor adjustments to street alignments for the purpose of increasing the lot depth to 200 feet, as noted m the Title of this Resolution, is m substantial compliance with the Cites current General Plan, Etiwanda Speafic Plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and pollees, and ©~~~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-45 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 2 b The extension of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 approval will not cause significant inconsistenaes with the current General Plan, speafic plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies, and c The extension of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 approval is not likely to cause public health and safety problems, and d Trimark Paafic Homes, L.P , since filing forthe Time Extension on June 22, 2004, has steadily pursued the resolution of off-site storm drain issues by working with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Engineering Department and the San Bernardino County Flood Control; and e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment forthe application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Gwdelines, the City Staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, fords (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent tudgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with mitigation measures during protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect d Pursuant to the requrements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753.5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. A biological assessment of the site by Michael Brandman Assoaates (MBA) in December of 2004, was conducted to evaluate the potential of the site to support special-status wildlife speaes and vegetation including, but not limited to, the following Burrowing Owl, Coastal Califoma Gnatcatcher, San Diego Horned Lizard, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, Slender-Horned Spineflower, and Johnston's Buckwheat A biologist conducted a p~~ ~'~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-45 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 3 • literature review and a physical walk of the entire site in order to evaluate the potential occurrence of sensitive biological resources on the protect site Additionally, a focused surveyfor the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat was completed in 2004 The biological assessment report states that the protect site is heavily disturbed Several dirt roads traverse the site, and discing for weed abatement purposes is evident on most of the property The site contains no blue line streams MBA conducted a final visit to the protect site on August 18, 2005, and found the site to be highly disturbed, and that the protect site does not provide swtable habitat for the California Gnatcatcher, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, and San Diego Horned Lizard. The report recommends that pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Game Code (CDFG), removal of any trees, shrubs, or any other potentially nesting habitat should not occur during the nesting season (generally February through August). The report recommends that apre-construction survey for nesting birds be done prior any ground disturbing activities. If active nests are found, informal consulting with CDFG is recommended If the birds are found to be nesting within 500 feet of the impact area, construction will need to be postponed until it is determined that the nest has successfully fledged young and it ~s determined by a qualified ornithologist that the nest is no longer active A mitigation measure has been included requiring that apre-construction survey for nesting birds shall be done prior any ground disturbing activities Based on substantial evidence, the Plamm~g Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in the California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753.5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Plamm~g Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho • Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Plamm~g Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby grants three (3), one year time extensions for: Tentative Tract Applicant Expiration SUBTT16114 Tnmark Pacific Homes, L P. June 27, 2005 SUBTT16114 Tnmark Paafic Homes, L P June 27, 2006 SUBTT16114 Tnmark Pacific Homes, L.P June 27, 2007 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 01-70 and the Standard Conditions, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to read as follows Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or . employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees, may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate, at its Q~~ ~n PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-45 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 4 own expense, in the defense of any such action but such participation . shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition 2) Provide a concrete textured finish at all mid-block trail crossings 3) The developer shall construct gated local feeder trail entrances consistent with the "FeederTrail 20-foot to 15-foot Transition Vehicle Gate with Side Access" Standard Drawing No 1006-B 4) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer of corner lots written notice of maintaining the landscaped parkway The written notice shall be signed by the prospectroe buyer prior to acceptance of a cash deposit on the property. 5) Where freestanding penmeter walls meet a slope condition, the penmeter wall shall be placed at the top of slope, behind a 1-foot bench 6) Along the north boundary of the local trail along Lots 3, 4, 9, and 10, a split face wall, with weep holes for drainage purpose, shall be constructed. All walls shall have a block cap 7) All interior side and rear walls shall be of block material All walls shall have a block cap. 8) All penmeter walls and all walls exposed to public view shall besplit-face . All walls shall have a block cap. 9) A 5-foot, double solid non-wood gate (10-foot total width) shall be installed at each trail access location to the horse corral area. 10) Trail improvements shall be installed per City Standard Drawing No 1004 (Community Trail Interior) for the Community Trail on the east boundary of the subdrnsion. Engineering Department 1) All applicable conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-70 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 shall apply. 2) An assessment distract shall be formed for maintenance of the proposed interim detention basin on Lot 13 or a maintenance agreement with a refundable deposit shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing private maintenance of the faality, providing the City with the right of access to maintain the facility if private maintenance is insuffiaent and allowing the City to assess those costs to the developer Said agreement shall be recorded to run with the property. 3) Interim faalities shall be removed and local storm drain completed across Lot 13 as soon as San Bernardino County Flood Control Distract • completes regional faalities, prior to development on Lot 13 Q ~~-~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-45 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 5 4) Install local storm drains to convey all development drainage to the Master Plan Storm Drams The cost of local storm drains shall be borne by this development with no fee credit a) All sump catch basins and laterals shall be designed to handle 0100 b) Extend the local storm drain system as far on site as needed to contain 025 within tops of curbs, 0100 within rights-of-way and prowde a 10-foot dry lane in 010 5) The northerly end of Pinto Place shall be designed to be a stubbed street Prowde a private trail dnve approach on the west side and sidewalk, to be extended north in the future on the east side 6) Where private local trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs or other diversionary devices shall be used W here a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the sidewalk/street. Provide curbside drain outlets for adjacent drainage devices 7) Provide residential dnve approaches for access to private local trails, • excluding the one on Lot 10 that does not require vehicular access All concrete within trails, including dnve approaches, should be medwm broom finish. 8) Construct an interior Community Trail, per Standard Drawing No. 1004, along east tract boundary Install prroate gates for Lots 10, 11, and 12 per Standard Drawing No 1009-B. Install pass-through per Standard Drawing No 1007 at local trail intersections Public Improvement Plans shall include a separate Community Trail Plan, subfect to approval of the City Engineer 9) The submitted W ater Quality Management Plan is substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check 10) Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the fvst Bulding Permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect. • p ~ ~--~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-45 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 6 Environmental Mitigation • Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAOMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAOMD Rule 1108 . 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds • exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements , ~ ~ ~--(bb PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-45 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 7 • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board [RW OCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditiornng, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resources 1) Apre-construction survey for nesting birds shall be done prior any ground disturbing activities If active nests are found, informal consulting with CDFG is required If the birds are found to be nesting within 500 feet of the impact area, construction will need to be postponed until it is determined that the nest has successfully fledged young and it is determined by a qualified ornithologist that the nest is no longer active Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point ~~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-45 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 8 • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also prowde specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e ,paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures- • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activties • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e., San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) dadyto reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle I~~loa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-45 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 9 tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activties entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy • periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of watertrucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The use of fossil filters or other drainage filtration systems will used at approved areas as called out on the Erosion Control Plan 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Thomsen Engineering, July 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 7) The protect has been designed to direct storm flows, when possible, to an outlet that drains to a regional drainage facility 8) Runoff from rooftops will be directed into landscape areas p ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-45 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTTi 6114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 10 9) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits 10) Pnorto issuance of Budding Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 11) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120 Monitoring at other times maybe regwred by the Budding Offical. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m. and 6 30 a m on weekdays, mcludmg Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings • u • p~~-~~~ `. J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-45 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P. Apnl 26, 2006 Page 11 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of Apnl 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. p ~ ~-lo s City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING ~ PROGRAM Project File No.: Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 and Development Rewew DRC2005-00401 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mdigatton measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration) fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelmes. As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the project. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the protect file with the department having the oncynal authority for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program TIME EXTENSION SUBTT16114 AND DRC2005-004014 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may arise regwring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible Cdydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwritten notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. In those instances requring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation actvities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building perrnits. p ~- ~-~0~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 and Development Review DRC2005-00401 Applicant: Trimark Pacific Homes. L.P. Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger, Associate Planner Date: October 20. 2004 .. . - .. . -. .. Air Quality All construction equpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD) as well as City Planning Statf All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Q 4'Q rn O oc 1 of 8 • .. • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughtares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction - Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , 80 C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible E S 2 of 8 C~ ~ .. . . . . . .. . . .. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 requred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resources ' Apre-construction survey for nesting birds shall be done CP B Plan Check A/B/C 2/4 prior any ground disturbing activities If active nests are found, informal consulting with CDFG is regwred It the birds are found to be nesting within 500 teet of the impact area, construction will need to be postponed until it is determined that the nest has successfully fledged young, and it is determined by a qualified ornithologist that the nest is no longer active Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point ~$ • • • • .. .. -. .. • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor - construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find 4 of 8 .. - .. ~ .. -. . . .. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical M i ~8 • ~ . -. .. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Grading Plan, and implemented forthe proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing actiwties are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or otf-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The use of fossil filters or other drainage filtration CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 systems will used at approved areas as called out on the Erosion Control Plan The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (name/date) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical The protect has been designed to direct storm flows, CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 when possible, to an outlet that drains to a regional drainage facility tM M CJ~' 6 of 8 .. ~ .. . - - , -. .. Runoff from rooftops will be directed into landscape CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas Landscaping plans shall include provisions for CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticideslherbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday M Co f s ~8 ~ • ,~ .. - -. .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4!7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigallon Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction 8 -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chiet or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Crtahon 8 of 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 SUBJECT: TENATIVE TRACT MAP (TIME EXTENSION) APPLICANT: TRIMARK PACIIC HOMES, L P LOCATION: APN 0225-131 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-45, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda Plan Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval m the case of a custom lot subdiwsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first ComoleUOn Date _,_, i _/~_ -/~_ ~-/- ~~_ 1 p~~-~i~ Prgect No SU8TT76114 Completion Date 4 Approval of this request shall not waroe compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Commurnty or Specrfic Plans m effect at the time of bulding permit issuance 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 6 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed _/_/_ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced ~~_ with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as _/~_ veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs. c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora ~~_ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail ~_/_ with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet e For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at ~~_ least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing 7 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the egwne ~_/_ animals where zoning regwrements for the keeping of said animals have been met Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs 8 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 9 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/~_ homeowners' assocation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for Cary Planner and City Engineer review and approved priorto the issuance of building permts 10 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter If a double wall ~_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, ail contiguous property ' s owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing waifs/ fences along the project perimeter 11 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/~_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency . 12 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood ~~_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought von and PVC 2 p ~-{ I'7 Protect No SUBTT16114 Completion Date C. 13 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/-/- 14 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the arkwa d th k _/_/_~ y e p an 5-foot wall/fence setbac required street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The er written notice of the parkway maintenance bu t y ive developer shall provide each prospec requirement, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/~- the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdiwsion 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in Th ~~- e accordance with the Muniapal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans served in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be r t b e p e o location of those trees shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arbonst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and tramming methods 3 Ail pnvate slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion ction shall include a permanent irrigation system to be th d b is se y control Slope planting regwre installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All pnvate slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2.1 or greater _/_/ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as er each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size t ree p follows one 15-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq tt of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in lanting required by this section shall Slo e l l p p ane ope p staggered clusters to soften and vary s include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold d th -/-/- riving maintained in a healthy an and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development _!_/_ Code This requirement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in hall be subject to City Planner review and approval and d l _JJ- s ans an the regwred landscape p coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 8 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, speamen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is regwred along East Avenue 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~~- perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the ~_/ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department g p ~~-'~~ 8 Protect No SUBTT16114 Completion Date 11 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of -/~_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code l ~ . Environmenta 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock _J-/- Crusherprotect in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, priorto accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways J_/- in astandard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepttng a cash deposit on any property 3 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~~- tmplementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be requred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $495 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit E. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~-/- of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) SEE ATTACHED APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from -/-/- street centerline) 44 total feet on East Avenue ~-/- 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards -/-/- 3 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for ~-/- approved openings East Avenue 4 Pnvate drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or -/-/- noted on the final map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shalt bequit-claimed or delineated on the -/~- final map 4p~,~-!l9 Protect No SUBTT76114 Comolehon Date G. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-wayshall be dedicated to the Ciry Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans andlor tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement, within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Troll Other East Avenue X X X X X Wilson Avenue X X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civli Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public andlor private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer _/-/- -/-/- ~_/- ~~- -/-/- ~~- -/-/- ~-/- -/-/- ~~- 5 p ~, ~,-lao Protect No SUBTT76114 Completion Date g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots . h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial drveways may have lines of sight plotted as required H. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public W orks Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be•annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Community Trail and East Avenue 2 A signed consent and waiver Corm to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 3 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City 4 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan East Avenue and Wilson Avenue. Etiwanda Specific Plan • Drainage and Flood Control 1 The protect (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer 2 It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone D designation removed from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded °X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 3 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved bythe City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as requred by the City Engineer 4 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is regwred for work within its right-of-way 5 Trees are prohibited within 5 teet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 6 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overtlows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- ~_~_ ~-~- ~~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- / / _/~- _/~_ 6 Q ~j~i"Ec~-~ Project No SUBTT16114 Comolenon Date J. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_• electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary -/-/- 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley W ater Distract (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits m the case of all other residential protects K. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage ~~- Fees shall be paid pnor to final map approval or pnor to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way San _/_/_ Bernardino County (North half of Wilson Avenue) and San Bernardino County Flood Control Distract 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved • APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED C~ 7 p ~, g,-la-a-- • Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Building & Safety SFR TRACT STANDARD CONDITIONS June 2, 2005 Trimark Paafic Homes Tract 16114 SEC Wilson & East Ave DRC2005-00401 NOTE: Any revisions may void these requirements and necessitate additional review. A. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Californa Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction 2 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code for required occupancy • separations. 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions B. General Requirements 1 Submit five conceptual sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan b Floor Plan c Foundation Plan d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning. g Planning Division Tracking Number (i e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, DRC, etc) must • be clearly noted on the Title Sheet of the plans Page 1 of 3 D ~~--1a-3 Separate permits are regwred for fenang and/or walls All sheets must be marked NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION • 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred pnor to plan check submittal 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Effiaency Program (CEEP) can contact the Budding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal regwrements C. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2003-00110 and SUBTPM16125) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for avadabdity of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts Pnor to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to. City Beautification Fee, Park . Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 The Budding and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and pnor to issuance of budding permits 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m. and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays D. Grading Grading of the subtect property shall be m accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check The final Grading Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Official pnor to the • issuance of budding permits Page 2 of 3 ~~ ~~ 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing butldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer Note on title sheet that plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved pnor to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bwlding and Safety Division if you have any questions about the procedure at 909-477- 2710. C_~ Page 3 of 3 ~ ~ ~a-~ ~,, v~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection _ District ,1 - Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS January 31, 2006 Tnmark Paafic Homes Tract 16114 SCE Wilson & East DRC2005-00401, DRC2004-00466 & SUBTT16114 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spaang and location of fire hydrants a For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet. b Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways n At intersections. ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bulding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided ' d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gallons per minute of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof p~~~~ FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The regwred fire flow for this protect is 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances For structures in excess of 3,600 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1. 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval. Pnvate fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provde regwred fire flow. 3 Fire service plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained pnor to submitting the overhead fire spnnkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: Buildings constructed in the designed Hazardous Fire Areas which include a. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). b. When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. FSC-7 Hazardous Fire Area This protect is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside Distract", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as Hioh Probability-Hioh Conseouence for Fire Risk These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. Hazard Reduction Plans The applicant shall prepare the architectural plans for the construction of the bwldings in accordance with the County of San Bernardino's Development Code as amended by RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A. Fve Area FS-3 requrements apply to the construction of the buildings based on the slope of the terrain and/or mitigation of the fuel modification plans The development code provides standards regulating and regwnng: ~ ~~-~a~ a Fire resistive roof assemblies b. Fuel Modification and hazard reduction plans c Fire District access roadways d Fire resistive construction and protection of openings e Fire sprinkler systems f. Fire flow criteria For construction requirements rn the "Hazard Fue Area" refer to the following web site: htto //www co sari-Bernardino ca us/landuseservices/DevCode (Chapter 2 Hazard Protection, Article 2 Fire Safety (FR) Overlay District) for an Adobe copy Also reference RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A. Comply with the following guidelines regarding submission of the Fuel Modification plan: Fuel Modification Plans Submit four (4) sets of plans (1) RCFPD; (1) Job Set; (1) Architectural Plans; (1) Recorded set Approved plan and documentation must be recorded with San Bernardino County prior to release of occupancy Proof of the recording must be provided to FCS Submittal Requirements: 1 Site plan (blueprint size) providing details of the zone areas (i.e ,Zone "A" -set back 0' - 30', Zone "B" -irrigation 30' - 80', etc ) 2 Text Document (8-1/2" x 11") to include details of how the fuel modification requrements will be met This text document will also include the following: a Successor clause -statement indicating that any subsequent homeowner must comply with the conditions of the fuel modification plan b Substitution clause -statement to read "Substitution or replacement of approved plants, with plants from the approved list, may occur without a resubmission, if the plants are similar and meet the same criteria " c Statement indicating that any maior change to the plans (i e., substitution of more than 50% of the approved plants; theme change and/or method change) will require a new submittal to the Fire District for rewew and approval. d Any reference to an approved guideline (i e , LA County; SB County Overlay Distracts FR-1, FR-2 or FS-3, Orange County) requues those portions of the gwdelmes referenced to be included in your document e Minimum 100' of fuel modification distance is required and shall include off-site property within the 100 feet distance The off-site portion of the plan will be . considered "thinrnng/modification" A letter from the adiacent property owner must - p~~~~ be included in the document OR a notarized letter providing a detailed "diligent" effort to contact the adjacent property owner 3 Mitigations to the fuel modification plan include a Installation of automatic fire sprinklers, or b. Installation of block walls, or Use of rated construction materials At the discretion of the Fire District, fuel modification plans may be regwred to validate the design assumptions by providing acomputer-generator model (BEHAVE) of the plan. NOTE: Fuel Modification Plans must be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval prior to the submittal of architectural drawings FSC-8 Chronological summary of RCFPD Hazardous Fire Area requirements Prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire District approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program The plan(s) shall be prepared by an individual or firm qualified and experienced in wildfire hazard mitigation planning Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall have submitted and obtain approval of a final fuel modification plan Further, the bwider shall have completed that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the project area Approval is subject to an on-site inspection Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modification/hazard reduction plan requrements shall be installed, inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff Schedule the inspection with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713 FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fue Marshal have review and approved the alternative method application submitted by the applicant for the installation of AFS in all structures due to fire access deficiency Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for revew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with p ~~- ~a~ RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections . All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Fuel Modification Plans Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements 4 Construction Access• The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 and the approved alternative method All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 5. Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCW D and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 6 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be . recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' °Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On pnvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code • 5 D~ I~ 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 5. Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with noncombustible 4-inch tall numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally illuminated dunng periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional fl- inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry Fuel Modification Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fue Hazardous Area regwrements 6 p ~~-13 I r, RESOLUTION NO 06-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00401, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 21 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16114 ON 15 15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0225-131-16 A Recitals 1 Trimark Paafic Homes, L.P , filed an application for Development Review DRC2005-00401, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 26th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a public hearing to consider the application All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on Apni 26, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on the east side of East Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 630 feet, and b The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and is zoned Neighborhood Commeraal and Very Low Residential, the property to the south is developed with Etiwanda Creek Park and is zoned Very Low Residential, the property to the east is vacant and is zoned Open Space, and the property to the west is developed with Fire Station No 176 and single-family dwelling units that are under construction and is zoned Estate Residential, and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-46 DRC2005-00401 -TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P Apnl 26, 2006 Page 2 d The applicant conducted one neighborhood meeting to inform the surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and to obtain their feedback and no residents attended the meeting; and e The protect design meets or exceeds the Very Low Residential Distract Basic Development Standards, and f The design of the single-family homes accomplishes a 360-degree architectural treatment by the application of complementary primary and secondary materials and architectural elements to all sides of the dwelling units, therefore, the architectural design of the protect meets the design goals of the General Plan and Development Code 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on April 26, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically fords and concludes as follows a That the proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and • b That the proposed design is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district m which the site is located, and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and • d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission fords that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City Staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intentto adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, fords (i) that the Mitigated Negatroe Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (n) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent tudgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these . findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negatroe Declaration p ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-46 DRC2005-00401 -TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 • Page 3 c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requvements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with mitigation measures during protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect. d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends A biological assessment of the site by Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) in December of 2004, was conducted to evaluate the potential of the site to support special-status wildlife species and vegetation including, but not limited to, the following• Burrowing Owl, Coastal California Gnatcatcher, San Diego Homed Lizard, San Bemardino Kangaroo Rat, Slender-Horned Spineflower, and Johnston's Buckwheat A biologist conducted a literature review and a physical walk of the entire site in order to evaluate the potential occurrence of sensitive biological resources on the protect site Additionally, a focused survey for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat was completed in 2004 The biological assessment report states that the protect site is heavily disturbed Several dirt roads traverse the site, and disang for weed abatement purposes is evident on most of the property The site contains no blue line streams MBA conducted a final visit to the protect site on August 18, 2005, and found the site to be highly disturbed, and that the protect site does not provide swtable habitat for the California Gnatcatcher, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, and San Diego Horned • Lizard. The report recommends that pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Game Code (CDFG), removal of any trees, shrubs, or any other potentially nesting habitat should not occur during the nesting season (generally February through August) The report recommends that apre-construction survey for nesting birds be done prior any ground disturbing activities If active nests are found, informal consulting with CDFG is recommended If the birds are found to be nesting within 500 feet of the impact area, construction will need to be postponed until it is determined that the nest has successfully fledged young and it is determined by a qualified ornithologist that the nest is no longer active A mitigation measure has been included regwnngthat apre-construction survey for nesting buds shall be done prior any ground disturbing activities Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in the California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ~ ~~--13y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-46 DRC2005-00401 -TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 4 . Planning Department 1) The plans submitted for plan check shall be consistent with the plans on file with the Planning Department as approved by the Design Review Committee on March 14, 2006. 2) The side elevations on Plan 1 A are to be enhanced to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Plans submitted for plan check shall indicate the enhancements. 3) The driveway grades are to be a maximum of 12 percent 4) Where private local trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs or other diversionary devices shall be used W here a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0 5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the sidewalWstreet. 5) Construct an interior Communiiy Trail, per Standard Drawing No. 1004, along the east tract boundary 6) Provide Feeder Trail, 15-foot Vehicle Gate with Side Access, and City Standard "Unauthorized Vehicles Prohibited" signs and side step through for horse access at the local trail access points, per City Standard Drawing • No 1006-C 7) Local Feeder Trails shall be constructed with decomposed granite with a 4-inch minimum base All rocks and debris shall be removed, and the trail surface shall be graded smooth 8) A 5-foot double, solid non-wood gate (10-foot total width) shall be installed at each trail access location to the horse corral area 9) Provide decorative perimeter fencing (i e., masonry) at all tract boundaries for enhanced fue protection and along the streets "Decorative" means stucco finish, split-faced block, or slumpstone. All walls shall have a matching block cap Smooth precision block is not acceptable The plans submitted for plan check shall indicate the regwred block walls 10) Retaining walls exposed to public view are to be decorative masonry "Decorative" means stucco finish, split-faced block, or slumpstone. All walls shall have a matching block cap Smooth precision block is not acceptable. 11) Return walls and corner sidewalls are to be decorative masonry and compatible with the architectural style "Decorative" means stucco finish, split-faced block, or slumpstone All walls shall have a matching block cap Smooth precision block is not acceptable 12) The developer shall provide each prospectroe buyer of corner lots written • notice of maintaining the landscaped parkway The written notice shall be ~ ~~`I ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-46 DRC2005-00401 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P . April 26, 2006 Page 5 signed by the prospective buyer prior to acceptance of a cash deposit on the property 13) Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real or native fieldstone Other forms of stone may be manufactured products 14) All interior side and rear walls shall be of block material Engmeenng Deoartment 1) All applicable conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No.01-70 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 shall apply. 2) An assessment district shall be formed for maintenance of the proposed interim detention basin on Lot 13 or a maintenance agreement with a refundable deposit shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing pnvate maintenance of the faality, providing the City with the right of access to maintain the faality if pnvate maintenance is insufficient and allowing the City to assess those costs to the developer Said agreement shall be recorded to run with the property 3) Interim faalities shall be removed and local storm drain completed across Lot 13 as soon as San Bernardino County Flood Control Distract completes regional facilities, prior to development on Lot 13 4) Install local storm drains to convey all development drainage to the Master Plan Storm Drains The cost of local storm drains shall be borne by this development with no fee credit a) All sump catch basins and laterals shall be designed to handle Q100 b) Extend the local storm drain system as far on site as needed to contain 025 within tops of curbs, 0100 within rights-of-way and provide a 10-foot dry lane m Q10 5) The northerly end of Pinto Place shall be designed to be a stubbed street Provide a pnvate tratl drive approach on the west side and sidewalk, to be extended north in the future on the east side 6) Where pnvate local trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs or other diversionary devices shall be used W here a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the sidewalWstreet Provide curbside drain outlets for adtacent drainage devices 7) Provide residential drive approaches for access to pnvate local trails, excluding the one on Lot 10 that does not regwre vehicular access All • concrete within trails, including drive approaches, should be medium broom finish ~ ~~ 13~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-46 DRC2005-00401 -TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 6 8) Construct an interior Commurnty Trail, per Standard Drawing No 1004, along east tract boundary Install private gates for Lots 10, 11, and 12 per Standard Drawing No 1009-B Install pass-through per Standard Drawing No 1007 at local trail intersections. Public Improvement Plans shall include a separate Community Trail Plan, subtect to approval of the City Engineer 9) The submitted Water Quality Management Plan is substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check 10) Prior to the issuance of Bwlding Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first Bwlding Permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect. Envvonmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sde for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) Ali paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions . p ~~-137 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-46 DRC2005-00401 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P . April 26, 2006 Page 7 Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule actiwties to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional W ater Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All residential and commeraal structures shall be requued to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commeraal structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping ~~~~ 3~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-46 DRC2005-00401 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page S - Biological Resources 1) Apre-construction survey for nesting birds shall be done prior any ground disturbing actiwties If active nests are found, informal consulting with CDFG is required If the birds are found to be nesting within 500 feet of the impact area, construction will need to be postponed until it is determined that the nest has successfully fledged young and it is determined by a qualified ornithologist that the nest is no longer active Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protector preserve them for study W ith the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdi- Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunityfor the Cityto establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point . Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologistto monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e ,paleontological monitoring}that maybe appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • D~~-I~'I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-46 DRC2005-00401 - TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 9 • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, droert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod . off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activties entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-46 DRC2005-00401 -TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 10 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The use of fossil filters or other drainage filtration systems will used at approved areas as called out on the Erosion Control Pian. 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Thomsen Engineering, July 2005 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 7) The protect has been designed to direct storm flows, when possible, to an outlet that drains to a regional drainage faality. 8) Runoff from rooftops will be directed into landscape areas. 9) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbiades. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions fora minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. 10) Prior to issuance of Bwlding Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 11) Prior to issuance of grading or pawng Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage underthe National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e, a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. ~ ~~ 1 ~l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-46 DRC2005-00401 -TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L P April 26, 2006 Page 11 ' 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the properly line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Bwlding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwlding Offical If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m the first phase 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS `~ `~~-`~~t a- City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 and Development Rewew DRC2005-00401 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration) fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the Cary m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department hawng the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Q ~ ~--~~3 Mitigation Monitoring Program TIME EXTENSION SUBTT16114 AND DRC2005-004014-TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES • Page 2 3. Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner 4. The prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unantiapated circumstances may arise regwring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Diwsion shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for Cary staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9 In those instances requinng long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits • p `~~ i~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 and Development Review DRC2005-00401 Applicant: Trimark Pacific Homes. L.P. Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger, Associate Planner Date: October 20, 2004 .. .. .. Av Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that then use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions ~8 • • • • - .. .. -. .. - , • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of 60 C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with Local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds Q e , BO C Dunng A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible M 2 of 8 ~ .. . - ... . .. - The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Revew of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resources Apre-construction survey for nesting birds shall be done CP B Plan Check A/B/C 2/4 prior any ground disturbing activities If active nests are found, informal consulting with CDFG is regwred If the birds are found to be nesting within 500 feet of the ~ impact area, construction will need to be postponed until it is determined that the nest has successfully fledged young, and it is determined by a qualified ornithologist that the nest is no longer actroe Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point 3 of 8 • • ~ .. -• . .. • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 condi4ons of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation montonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find oc 4 of 8 -. .. • Prepare, identity, and curate all recovered fossils for BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) dailyto reduce PM,oemissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 'ep 1 S S 5of8 • ~ .. ... , -. .. - An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The use of fossil filters or other drainage filtration CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 systems will used at approved areas as called out on the Erosion Control Plan The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (name/date) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical The protect has been designed to direct storm flows, CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 when possible, to an outlet that drains to a regional drainage facility C~ OI 6 of 8 -. .. Runoff from rooftops will be dvected into landscape CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas Landscaping plans shall include provisions for CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bulding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 7of8 • • . - -. .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction (~ including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a 1 national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for v'1 hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to 4l and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Pian denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - CRatlon 8 of 8 STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00401 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR 21 LOTS APPLICANT: TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L.P. LOCATION: APN 0225-131-16 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the attemative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-46, Standard Conditions, and all env~ronmentai mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on fde in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda Specific Pian SC-1-OS t D ~`~~ Comoletion Dat -/-/- -/-/- ~~_ -/-/- Protect No DRC2005-00401 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bulding Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bwldtng elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _J-/- submiried for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Cade, all ~~_ other applicable City Ordinances, and appllcable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwldtng permit issuance 7 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be ~~_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For singie- iamily residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8 All bwldtng numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 9 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed _/_/_ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in confunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced _/~_ with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as ~_J- veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora _/~_ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail _/_/_ with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet e For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at ~~_ least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing 10 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine -J-l animals where zoning regwrements for the keeping of said animals have been met Individual lot owners to subdmsions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs 11 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the E ~_/_ ngineering Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and SC-1-05 p~~~i5~ Protect No DRC2005-00401 ComDlehon Date Departments and the Clty Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said Information changes 12 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/~_ homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Clty Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and Clty Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 13 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/~_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 14 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter It a double wall _/~_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property ' s owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project perimeter 15 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along Interior side and rear property Imes), rather than _/~_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 16 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood ~_/_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 17 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 18 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The _/_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and Irrigation In addition to the ~ required street trees Detailed landscape and Irrigation plans shall be submitted for Clry Planner review and approval prior to Issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping Including trees, shrubs, ground covers and Irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, In a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, Including slope planting and model home landscaping In _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Clry Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits or prior final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more In vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be Installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater ~~_ slope shall be landscaped and Irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet In vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall Include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy SC-1-05 Project No DRC2005-00401 Completion Date 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously • maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be requred per the Development Code This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 7 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along East Avenue 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 9 All walls shall be provided with decoratroe treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 10 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xenscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 11 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Macutata (Spotted Gum) is regwred at a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and vrigation of these trees shall comply with the Crtys Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100) Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher protect in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 3 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $495 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit F. Other Agencies The applicant shat l contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits SC-1-OS -~_~ ~-~ / / J~_ _/~- ~~- -~-~- ~-~- ~~- _J~-- _/~- ~~- p ~-I S(o Protect No DRC2005-00401 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) SEE ATTACHED. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 44 total feet on East Avenue 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings East Avenue 4 Private drainage easements for cross-iot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City H. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interlorstreets, drainagefacilities, communitytralls, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street Improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement, within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trail Other East Avenue X X X X X Wilson Avenue X X X X X Notes (a) Median island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Ciry Engineer Security shall be • _/~_ ~~- ~~- -~-~- / / ~-f_ -/-~-• -~-~- ~~- ~~- ~_~- • SC-1-05 p~~-IS-~ Prgect No DRC2005-00401 posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto • final map approval or the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Otfice in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer- d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise speatied by the City Engineer 2) Condwt shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required Acash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer • g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the Citys street tree program 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required I. Public Maintenance Areas A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District CommunityTrad A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City • SC-1-OS Completion Dete -~-~- -/~- _/~- ~~- / / ~-~- ~-~- ~-~- _/~- _/~_ ~~- _/___J_ D ~ ~"1.58 Project No DRC2005-00401 Comoletion Date K. L. 4 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _/_/_ Beautification Master Plan East Avenue and Wilson Avenue Etiwanda Specific Plan • Drainage and Flood Control 1 The prolect (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection _/~_ measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer 2 It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone D designation removed ~~_ from the prolect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection faalities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA pnor to final map approval or issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs fvst 3 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map ~~_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 4 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its _/~_ nght-of-way 5 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured ~~_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 6 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a _J-/- sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls Uti lities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ~_J_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) m accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as requred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/~- 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the _J_/- Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects Ge neral Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage ~~_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or pnor to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agenaes for work within their right of-way' San ~~_ Bernardino County (North half of Wilson Avenue and San Bernardrno County Flood Control Distract ) • SC-1-OS p ~,~-~s~ Protect No DRC2005-00401 Comolehon Date 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwiding permit Issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on ail entrance doors If windows are within 40 Inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices N. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be Itfted from frame or track in any manner APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED s / / -~-~- ~~- ~_~- ~~- sc_,_o5 p ~~,-~ ~~ Rancho Cucamonga Community -~ Development Building & Safety SFR TRACT STANDARD CONDITIONS June 2, 2005 Tnmark Pacific Homes Tract 16114 SEC Wilson & East Ave DRC2005-00401 NOTE: Any revisions may void these requirements and necessitate additional review. A. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Califorrna Bwlding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction 2 Provide compliance with the California Bwldmg Code for required occupancy separations 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions B. General Requirements 1 Submit five conceptual sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan b. Floor Plan c Foundation Plan d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditiornng g Planning Division Tracking Number (i e , SUBTT, SUBTPM, DRC, etc.) must be clearly noted on the Title Sheet of the plans . Page 1 of 3 ~~~`~~0~ h Separate permits are required for Penang and/or walls . i All sheets must be marked NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred pnor to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Budding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements C. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2003-00110 and SUBTPM16125) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for avadabdity of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Prior to issuance of budding permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to' City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of budding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8.00 p m and 6 30 a m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays D. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Bwlding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final Grading Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be • completed, submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Offiaal prior to the issuance of budding permits Page 2 of 3 p ~ ~,--1 ~a~- 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for ali new construction projects • and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer Note on title sheet that plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved pnor to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division if you have any questions about the procedure at 909-477- 2710 I. J Page 3 of 3 p~~-~~ ~,v~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection - District --- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS January 31, 2006 Trimark Paafic Homes Tract 16114 SCE Wilson & East DRC2005-00401, DRC2004-00466 & SUBTT16114 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spaang and location of fire hydrants a For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b. Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fve hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv. As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fue District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c. If any portion of a facility or buldmg is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the faality or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gallons per minute of regwred fire flow or • fraction thereof a ~~--I~~ FSC-2 Fire Flow The regwred fire flow for this protect is 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual • pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances For structures in excess of 3,600 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to prowde the regwred fire flow subiect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 3 Fire service plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, speafications and calculations for the fue sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other • applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in• Buildings constructed m the designed Hazardous Fire Areas which include a All structures that do not meet Fire Distract access requrements (see Fire Access) b When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure FSC-7 Hazardous Fire Area This protect is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Seventy Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-High Consequence for Fire Risk These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District The Hazardous Fue Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Hazard Reduction Plans. The applicant shall prepare the architectural plans for the construction of the bwldings in accordance with the County of San Bernardino's Development Code as amended by RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A. Fire Area FS-3 requirements apply to the construction of the bwldings based on the slope of the terrain and/or mitigation of the fuel modification plans The development code provides standards regulating and regwring. • 2 Q ~,~-~~s a Fire resistive roof assemblies b Fuel Modification and hazard reduction plans c Fire District access roadways d Fire resistive construction and protection of openings e Fire spunkier systems f Fire flow criteria For construction requrements in the "Hazard Fire Area" refer to the following web site htto //www co sari-bernardino ca us/landuseservices/DevCode (Chapter 2 Hazard Protection, Article 2 Fire Safety (FR) Overlay District) for an Adobe copy Also reference RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A Comply with the following guidelines regarding submission of the Fuel Modification plan: Fuel Modification Plans Submit four (4) sets of plans (1) RCFPD; (1) Job Set, (1) Architectural Plans, (1) Recorded set Approved plan and documentation must be recorded with San Bernardino County prior to release of occupancy. Proof of the recording must be provided to FCS Submittal Requirements: 1 Site plan (blueprint size) providing details of the zone areas (i a ,Zone "A" -set back 0' - 30', Zone "B" -irrigation 30' - 80', etc.) Text Document (8-1 /2" x 11") to include details of how the fuel modification requirements will be met This text document will also include the following a Successor clause -statement indicating that any subsequent homeowner must comply with the conditions of the fuel modification plan b Substitution clause -statement to read. "Substitution or replacement of approved plants, with plants from the approved list, may occur without a resubmission, rf the plants are similar and meet the same criteria " c Statement indicating that any major change to the plans (i a ,substitution of more than 50% of the approved plants; theme change and/or method change) will regwre a new submittal to the Fire District for review and approval. d Any reference to an approved gwdelme (i e , lA County; SB County Overlay Districts FR-1, FR-2 or FS-3, Orange County) requires those portions of the guidelines referenced to be included m your document e Minimum 100' of fuel modification distance is required and shall include off-site property within the 100 feet distance The off-site portion of the plan will be considered "thmnmg/modification". A letter from the adjacent property owner must 3 ~~~-l~~ be included in the document OR a notarized letter providing a detailed "diligent" effort to contact the adjacent property owner 3 Mitigations to the fuel modification plan include• a. Installation of automatic fire sprinklers; or b Installation of block walls; or c. Use of rated construction materials At the discretion of the Fire District, fuel modification plans may be required to validate the design assumptions byproviding acomputer-generator model (BEHAVE) of the plan. NOTE: Fuel Modification Plans must be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval prior to the submittal of architectural drawings FSC-8 Chronological summary of RCFPD Hazardous Fire Area requirements Prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fue District approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program. The plan(s) shall be prepared by an indiwdual or firm qualified and experienced in wildfire hazard mitigation planning. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall have submitted and obtain approval of a final fuel modification plan Further, the bwlder shall have completed that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the project area. Approval is subject to an on-site inspection Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modification/hazard reduction plan requrements shall be installed, inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff Schedule the inspection with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713 FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal have review and approved the alternative method application submitted by the applicant for the installation of AFS in all structures due to fue access deficiency Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fue Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delvering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect All requued public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Fuel Modification Plans• Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area regwrements 4 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 and the approved alternative method All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 5 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCW D must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCW D and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services . 6 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements. All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers• All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fue hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the requved fire flow in accordance with the • California Fire Code. 5 p~~-~~~a 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services • 4 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 5 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-faintly dwellings shall post the address with noncombustible 4-inch tall numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally dlummated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street. When budding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional fl- inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry Fuel Modification Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area regwrements. u • 6 p~~-r~~ Planning Commission Meeting of ~2~ o~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and aty and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you -~ n 1 NAME ADDRESS CITY ,'ITEM 1 ~1 ~~Lc~n.~ (~~7 n~.. Q~t~l t ~ ~~~CO~_ V g . 2 ~i~ ~l~ Ib~ C~1~1~~ r 3 ~ ~~~ ~f6 11(~'I I YV1T ~ICCY C {~ANC1~ C>x~~.ta~s"N' 4 _~D~RG~ ?,03~ P3^cl«a~.~Jr,' _~ Be.,~-- $-~ 5 ~~ ~.~1~- o°o-, n~ 6 7 8 9 10 11. 12 13 14 15 i6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35