Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1985/03/20 - Agenda Packet
C~CA,Np ~C ~'~ j ~ ~ RA1NC]'10 ClICi1~10r1GA ct~ cou~vciL ~ z ~r:~n~ U > 1977 Lions Park Community Cancer 9161 ease Line Raad Ragcho Cucamonga, California March 20. 1985 - 7:30 p•m• All i[e~s sabsutted for the City Council Agenda aoat 6e in meriting. 'fhe deadline for sabsitting these iteas is 5:00 p.~. w the Yedneaday prior to the seating. The City Clerk's Offiee receisrp all such ite+.a. 1. CALL YO 010611 • A. Pledge of Allegiance to Fleg. e. Roll Call: Wright Buquet `,Nike le Dahl `, and Ring _. C. Approval of Minutes; Nane 2 AsYDOtCINdr't3/P18S66TAM063 q. Thursday, March 21, 1985, 7:30 p.m. - PARR DEVELOPMBNT COMMISSION, Lions Park Co®uni ty Center. B. Wednesday, March 27, 1985, 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COlOtISS ION, Lions Park Community Center. C. Thur edey, March 26, 1985, 7:30 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION, Library Con f ereoce Room. D, Preaenta[i on of City Plaque to Robert Dougherty for outa[anding service as City Attorney, E. Pr eaen[ation of City Plaque to 8dvard Ropson for ou[etendicg service ss Ae eiatent City Attorney. City Council Agenda -2- Na rch 20, 1985 3. COFSHIS CALEt1DAR She folloviog Coaaent Calendar iteaa are ezpected to be rwtine and nw-ewtrwersial. The? will be acted apon b7 the Cwneil at we five vithw[ disrnaaiw. A. Approval of Aarrante, Register Na'e. 85-03-20 and 1 Payroll ending 03/03/35 for the total amount of $428,473.54. e. Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AB 85-03 for 7 Off-Sale Beer A Nine Eating Place Lice nee, Soel A. S[e rr eft, 10110 Pooth ill Boulevard. C. Forward Clsim :CL 85-09) against the City by Richard 8 Dean Yates, failure of Ci[y to inform claimant of raga la[i ons concerning running a bu ainess out of hie home, December 15, 1981. D. Approval of Parcel Hap 8063, Band, Agreement and Real 10 Property Improvement Con[rac[ and Lien Agreament, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Bou levatd and Eellman Avenue, submitted by Lev ie Development Company. • RESOLUTION N0. 85-73 ''8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, f,ALIFORNLA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP N0. 8063, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 8063), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND INPROV@fENT SECURITY RESOLUTION N0. 85-74 ''9 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT PROM LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR PARCEL MAP 8063 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERE TO SIGN THE SAME E, Approval of Parcel Mep 8828, Bond and Agreement, 70 located on the west aide of Vineyard Avenue 6e tween Arrow Highway and Ninth Street, submit fed by Barmakien Company. City Council Agenda -3- March Z0, 1985 RESOLUTION NO. 85-75 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 8828, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY (TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP 8828) F. Approval of Parcel Map 9079 and Real Property 39 Improvement Contrac[ and Lie¢ Agreement, loca[ed et [he northeast corner of Base Line Rcad and Archiba id Avenue, submitted by Sycamore Investments. RESOLUTION N0. SS-"16 4i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 9079 (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP 9079) RESOLIrLION N0. 85-77 46 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN • AGREEMENT FROM SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS, FOR PARCEL MAP 9079 AND AUTHORTZ INC THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN TEE SAME C. Approval of Tr ac[ No. 10035, Security and Agreemen[, 47 located on the sou [h and eas[ aide of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Callp Corazan, submitted by Rancho Aseoci a[es, Ltd. RESOLUTION N0. 85-78 5C A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY luYD FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 10035 N. Approval o£ Bc¢ds, Agreement end Final Map of Tract 5l 11893, located on the south aide of Banyan, pest of Sapphire, submitted by Plaza Builders, I¢c. RESOLUTION N0. 85-79 79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 11893 FJ City Council Agenda -4- March 20, 1985 I. Approval of Tract No. 12772-1, Honda and Agreement, located on the west aide of Turner Avenue at Palo Alto Street, submitted by Morris A Searles. RESOLUTION N0. 85-80 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING I`1PROVENENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY ADD FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 12772-1 J. Approval of Tract No. 12801-I, Bonds and Agreement, located on the south aide of Banyan Street, east of Carnelian Street, submit tad by [he Deer Creek Company RESOLUTION N0. 85-81 A RESOLUTION OP TFIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVElH!NT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0, 12801-1 R. Release of Bonds: Tract 9638_ - Lota tad north of Lemon, west of Archibald; owner Cr Tamar Development Corporation. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond 58,450.00 L. Approval of a Pipeline License between [he Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and the City in connection with Tract 11606-1, located east of Haven Avenue be [we en Baee Line Roed and 19th Street and also the approval of an agreement between [he developer, Harclaye-Tac and the Ci[y. RESOLUTION N0. 85-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PIPELINE LICENSE BETWEEN THE f,I TY AND THE ATCH IS ON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A STORM DRAIN PIPE BENEATH THE RAILROAD TRACKS M. Approval of Agreement with James L. Markman Law Office for legal eery ice s. Bo 94 95 108 L09 110 120 12L City Council Agenda -5- Na rch 20, 1985 • N. Approval of Firs[ Amendment to Agreemect for (see RDA page i) cooperation between the Foothill Fire Protection District, the Redevel opmen[ Agency of [he City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga. 0. Approval of award of contract for the Ame[hy st Avenue 1:5 Sidewalk Improvements [o the lowest, responsible bidder, Cedric C. Elian Paving Contrac COra of Pomona, California, at the amount of $29,741.86 plus lOZ contingeaciee. The total amount not to exceed $32,715.16. Approval of Street Pr ontage Construction Reimbursement 128 Agreement between Robert A. and Shirley A. Le ea and [he Ci Cy of Reecho Cucamonga. The agreement allove for reimbursement [o be made to [he City for the covet ruction of street frontage improvements at 10213 Base Line Road. This agreement includes a Grant of Easement for Roadvey Had .°.elated Purposes for Che ultimate widening of Baee Line. RESOLUTION N0. 85-83 136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T8E LITY • OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APFADY*_NG STREET FRONTAGE CONSTRUCTION REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ROBEP.T A. AND BRIRLEY A. LEES AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Q. Approval of Street Pr ontage Conetru ct ion fteimbur semen[ 137 Agreement between Dol or ea Browne end the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga for reimbursements to be made by Ms. Browne to [he City for street improvements to be built along Baee Line Road vest of Ivy t.ane. The agreement also gr ante Lo [he City an Easement for Roadway Purposes along Eaee Line Road end Ivy Lane. Such Crant of Easement is intended to allow for [he ultimate widening o£ these streets. RESOLUTION N0. 85-84 I+5 A RESOLUTION OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OP TAE CITY OF RANCAO CUCAMONCA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING BTREET FRONTAGE CONSTRUCTION REINBURS@fENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN DOLORES BROWNE AND TAE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA City Council Agenda -6- March 20, 1985 R. Approval of Soint Cona[ruc[ion Agreement For Btree to and Severliae Conatructi on on Archibald Avenue be [veers Cucamonga County Na ter District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION N0. 85-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SOIPT CONSTRUCTION ACREEltENT FOR STREETS AND SENERLINE CONSTRUCTION BETNEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CULAHONGA AND COCANONGA COONTY MATER DISTRICT S. Approval of the final expenditure of $100,447.95 For 146 [he Hellman Avenue from 6th Street to 656 Eeet North Reconstruction Project, accept [be improvements ea cwple [e and authorize the Finance Director Co make [he appropriate tranafeC of additional funds frw Ces Taz or Systems Development revenue source. T. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 1 for Engineering 147 Design Services on the Base Line Raad Improvements frw Teak Gay to Raven Avenue. • U. Approval of Eatenei on to Rindercare for Agreement For 159 Ine[a llaCion of Drai nags Faci lilies. V. Approval of au [h orizati on expenditure of $70,000.00 159 Frw General Fund Budgeted Contingency for purchase of telephone system from ITT Business Cwmuni cati ana Corporation. M. Set public hearing for April 17, 1985, for In tea[ Co Annex Tract Nos. 12362, 12621, 12091, 11781, 11625, 12525, 12740, 12741 and 12772-1 an Annexation No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance DiaCri<[ No. 1 and Tr ac[ Noe. 12621, 12772-1, 12525, 12739, 12740 and 12741 and Annexe ti on No. 7 [o Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 85-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMI::ARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNERAT ION NO. 9 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 Ci cy Council Agenda -7- March 20, 1985 RESOLUTION N0. 85-87 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING HAINTENANCB DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSES SNENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNERATION N0. 9 TO STRBET LIGRTI)IG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFPERINC A TIRE AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS TREHETO RESOLllTION N0. 85-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEEE'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO STREET LICATING MAINTENANCB DISTRICT N0. 2 RESOLUTION N0. 85-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONCA, CALIPORNIA, DECLARING S ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGNTINC MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN AESES SMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO BTAEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LICATING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE POR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO X, Se[ public hearing for April 17, 1985, £or Intent to Mnex Tzact Nos. 12525, 12539, 12540, 12541, 11781, 12772-1, 1262I, 11625, 12362 end 9539 to Landscape Maintenance Di attic[ No. 1 as Mnexa ti on No. 22. RESOLUTION N0. 85-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMUNGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRPLIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 22 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIBTRICT N0. 1 ,~ City Council Agenda -8- March 20, 1985 . RES OLPfION N0. 85-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTE:iTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NC, 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; DESIGNATING SAiD ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 22 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND L'GHTINC ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 4. ADVEATIS® PEBLIC HHARIPGS A. ADOPTION OF 1982 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE - This 21s adoption will enact the latest available edi ei on of the aetionally recognized Uniform Mechanical Code and fulfill State mends Ge for its adoption. Item continued from Herch 6, 1985 meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 252 (second reading) 215 . AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORN IA, ADOPTING THE 1982 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE B. ADOPTION OF 1982 UNIFORM NOUBING CODE -This adoption ''-19 will enact the late et available edi ti,on of [he ^ati ooally recognized Uniform Nouaing Code and fulfill Sta to mandate for its adoption. ORDINANCE N0. 254 (first readiag) 220 AN ORDINANCE OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, ADOPTING THE 1982 EDITION OP TEE UNIFORM NOUSING CODE C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 222 85-OIA - RICEAEDS - A reque e[ to amend the General Plan Land IIae Map From Low Denei ty Rea identiel to Industrial Park for 2.5 scree of lend located on the soothes et corner of Archibald and Main - APN 209-062-01, and 02. City Council Agenda -9- March 20, 1485 RESOLUTION N0. 85-92 Zw5 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIPOR.""'-A, AMENDING TdE ADOPTED LAND USE ELEMENT UP THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN D. COMMUNITY OEVELOPHENT_ BLOCK GRANT APPLICATIONS FOB 2G6 FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 - The Council will rev iev [he preliminary statement of community objectives and se lec[ for funding those projects moat ceeded in the Community. RESOLUTION N0. 85-93 =>~ A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COllNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CIICAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING PRELIMINARY STATEIffJ7T OF COlONNITY OBJECTIVES AND SELECTING PROJECTS POR PRELIMINARY FUNDING E. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 - ALTA LONA CHANNEL 259 IMPROVEMENTS RESOLUTION No. 85-94 275 • A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OVERRllLING AND DENYING PROTESTS AND HARING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION N0. 85-95 278 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND PROVIDING FOR CONTRIBUTION TO PAY CERTAIN COSTS AND EEPENSES IN AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION N0. 85-96 280 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE, TOGETHER HLTR APPURTENANCES, AND APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S "REPORT" ~, J CiCy Council Agenda -10- March 2D, 1985 . RESOLUTION N0. 85-97 2S+ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AOTHORI2INC ANO PROVIDING FOR TAE ISSUANCE OF BONDS PORSOANT TO THE "IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF 1915" RESOLUTION N0. 85-98 291 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ARARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTROCTION OF CERTAIN PUALIC WORKS OF IMPROVElIENT IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION N0. 85-99 294 A RES OLOTION OP THE CIG7 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CIICANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND NARINC ANARD POR SALE OF BONDS, AND PROVIDING FOR TflE ESTAeLISH:dENT OF A REDEMPTION FUND FOR THE PAYMENT OP SAID HONDS • s. eon-eDVS4TLS~ aeeclncs No Items Submitted 6. CITY MAnAGBR'S STAPP ¢HPOIxs A. ETINANDA AREA DRAINAGE PLAN AND POLICIES - Recommend 297 approval of the Interim Etivanda Area Drainage and Development Pol iciea. RESOLUTION N0. 85-100 303 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INTERIM ETINANDA AREA DRAINAGE AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES e. A REpUEST BY THE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS COMMITTEE OF THE 704 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OP COMMERCE FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 10 SC. NEICH RELATES TO PARR AND RECREATION DEDICATION IN SUBDIVISIONS City Council Agenda -11- Marsh 20, 1985 C. CHAFFEY-GARCIA BOOSE 308 D. CONSIDERATION OF TASR FORCE PINDINC ON AMLULANCE 309 SERVICES E. STATUS REPORT REGARDING MODIFICATIONS TO CITY OFFICES OFFICES (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT) F. STATUS REPORT OF PDBLIC SAFETY-CIVIC CENTER FACILITY 7. COIRICIL 6QSII63S A. APPOINTMENTS ON tlISTORIC PRESERVATION COlR1ISSI ON AND 330 PARR DEVELOPMENT COlDfISSION 8. ADJODiO®T • ~J ~< R • i 1 1 .r H 1 IL 1 L 1 1 1 1 a1 3 a 1 1 1 it I (Y 1 ~ 1 < I 31 i 1 I I i i I 1 (Y 1 U I N 1 W 1 A 1 I 1 IW 1 H w; 1 ' ~ i f I i....~ I . t a O o~ .)al. o -J J!~oOw.Jao oo `: aJwo.. olp ~J~~20 mmpty 10 O~ UL. O of .J IIM\O W~V .u OK~1~0~ .. Jv~OP(Tl~+fnJ~ vIa\'..J M - ~ (.~ 1[\ 1 LL\ 'r N r P r- .uWln P'+"r:7 ~P PU\ r+I.+T 01n-.r r. Ni\r P ., .~~ii LOcJ .. .JI~~ vJC 'O n-~ wNnm Ulvrm +m~\ q 1.- { •1 N I. NYAIr'A ~~d: .1 ~4 ~ ~1i ~:. 1~~[i ~ I Ni _ 1 I rJ F' ~. '! rn Fl'f ~ I ~ N ~ ti ; it 1111 9. ~ "a~fi i ~ ~ .. R ..: ~ f Ml11~ 141Y ~ .. <^i ftf~ .Y 1~! 9 -~~W•Y I(\n . u.ll`~1"J'U'^CU . .r'N T.1'I.\.(I i-NPU .+ ~Y1(\.pl^-(U 'T ~U /I NII'I ~~IC\~+1# W .. .-SP Y''- P n v~:pNp1u P . .: m(OP C`u .n,p.PPli• ^TPPU /p•PP,S.-u•PPO .. .J .J06 UICJ C.J a11~•~•+MM :J .. JO O~OluJ :1 .J~ {9 ..-J .IOU V ,J .. .+.Y -+ . .. .+.a .a .a -. .+n+n.a,-. .. +•IHN I ; .N`N N.rvr r.I iVNNI.v r.l V .J O O .,, O ..J .JVOO~-~JJOCJU ._~-.JO~V~iJ~.~!O®OIJUU i I I P a] J` U ~ Ju\. ~^g ,II v - ..] .9 W r- 'O .r ~ H ~ .~ .-~ ..n .. ~ < i0 .J ry _ d' N .~ ]1 L ~ • J W ~ O ; ] L J L ;' : U l i y . .~ id > ._P lJ s [e ¢ w J a t) r0 Z~l W wJJ .IU Y_ .. N _ r L J - < ~ >.t-IJ J-+banJObn .~ILMd d „ _ - ~ + _ C_I d U I ,...J 1p Y < -• lC IA 1).-ad1_JJJ~U JJIJ£~ C•10 J J tC i ~ r Z •> +^7 _J J.J ..I J~J ~WU lJ I- ~ J ~ H J In j < rn 9 •i h •t I« < ~: .> ] O - ~i r _. L'LC •-. WIL ~ IY 5'].J .~iQ11O mI'J N ~ U C] J -S LK._ IY< .• ~~WJ~.._._F+F p..~-..IJY16• 2 L ~ - 4L I~ L ~ .' _~n ly U4u u JW W WI~ i e.L3W ~ ... Yl LL .l ~-[J L•i -lld .]Y U.LL -~tNNIA{ 4' LLO -a W W S , ... ^+U .IW iO Uw + J + Wti44~i~(«III/.C why IY a lup ] r- K [ 3 E 1 m O 9 LL K _ n J . an - C J-: u IL /1 A P ., ) N I lG Y r J iJ I ~O W I ~Z I I _ II C 1 Z II < I I ^. I ~ i I ~ 1 YY 1 W I J ~ 1 I I ~' 1 1... 1-. N 1 ~ 2 LL U L U i L IV t Z m J O ~ ~ L :J" L ( C j _ L .- U U L i 7 -r C \n < £ p i i ra 1 ~ l + ,]• 1\ u m - a - o I .p r- I \ ~. ~ C J L ly J H J L U In 4' +U iL - J Q O~) ~ r.: SL +cY 4 u : lY ~] ~Y I _ ] J L r t )~J t iY N J.J F~ .IH Y ~t~t<C) .]IY ~ ) 1 2) t u J Yi.-J ~Yb lJ •i '- -rJ f~r)~l- uI~J _ i LL .-v ~1 i < ~ p = 1 In + f ] Y \u J~J ~Ip ...a r29 ~I:-. '. J `•1•u\I~'i v yl/I F1Q ~~n V JFV w~ i y t r 1 ~ .. ~•I __J _. L_: m K ~ /. :H U 3 ~ • Y- ~) IY ~ J L [ ~J CL'J. s.- <¢U ~_ 6 £ :Y ~f IL .L )-J y L¢ O U 6 N < K LL JI u< i i' ^ ~ ~ N •'1 J J J t l L . ~. G Q Q ~ (¢J Z 2 V C ,) v i r, oimoo 1 ,J I J I - 6 u I J .Jwl- I YL <Sr] I ] -.i J: 1 s .t L 1 Y ] ~~~ n j •-a I ~ [ 1- H I- 1 ~ L _O 7 I - Z J ) I a 7'~ O I n~~9 1 : ly 1 < •L I J> i1L 't . I w 'J ~ I ,.n e I a ~ 1. u ¢ i ~ x ¢ c ~ , e- J '~' . aOYf(00 u' .I . ~1 ~wano L ^~W ~ I . '' i ., ., ~ r w I~ ~ 1 Lf v rv ~'v 't I 31 I 1 1 v q 'iR 1 ~ cl .. Nr N YY 1 ~•+ Iry NN 4' 1 .J V U (l . < I fJ rvN 31 1 .i,)-UUU 1 I • 1 IG 1 J -] 1 ~ J I I I + ti - 1 tJGJ 1 u O -' , aVln . £ l e. ,L ~- 1 _ •t C] J .J I /._ :/L LL 1 7 J I 3 5 :,. ~ A ) (C 1 .. J 4 I V 1 _ aH w W 1 U uJ 1 `.l J ] !_ U I - w ! +i ~~ 1 10> W 1 1 I t LL < H ~ ..nlJ2 I Hr .¢ ]•S I l , cY L I 1 1 1 I i • 1 - 1 - -1 1 1 W 1 1 1 1 L.~.~ I I~ u .. inme.lmati~zrw.N~~'~]u o~.., ._,J lOOmw,vN~rwr wln~o v,nmML~mm T~pu .. wlnPO•- .+F O.r Iu-, u, WWW .a t~.a ,. .-. `.lu .I .I -W+, wrv Nrrp tDrr. I~ NPmY_ ..L)In Nw.mtiMnO v u ~~XnmriU•vvrm,r'•` 1,.7mI[, a~'~'v u,vOlnMVmJmwiK ~O Vyy _ N L'- N I1, J •'a 4` u ~ H Y .+ .-1 r111L 1(1 Y ~J I~ '1 .+ ut ! ry N Y LLT I r - Wr_may]. 'Jmv-ut", ..PV.r In .o r.:. _^J.-INmv ,arm ~~r (VNNr'i -f f•lm m.l -: YY'J'.)--: . . It, lL, u\1. u'I[, It, ,. (lU U•~^ ,J000„~ ~:~„ _ ,no u•- .wOOu: y .,nu ~, fJNNiJ ~ INNNt.I ~ N(V N~. .., fJNN(v'!!JNNNtlf JNIV . ..UVL.. ..,„VC)G)u ., v.i :J• ~-.•VUU. ,, ..000..1 .J ;IO.J f.f /1 )n /I n.n _ w~ ~z F w - ~ I- 1- r- .~.J ~ ~ H -. J .. HH.-t ~. 1-a .. .-. ~, F L Y LL'~2 .L< 2' lY JLY _ W w W .. ., Z W J 2L L 2 w'2 __ F- I- r- ~ ~ (~ r - F- - _> .. L. I> _1 IY J J ] O U ., ' W W W ~.1 .. O W ..~ ,.i lJ aJ w L L +J R _ LL £ Y J d LL J U a_ _] .J .;v U v) S ) Jam' 1 LLVI uLL FLU to i)L U •f<WU, _. J Z tY > LC _ w IL .y L \If U • t .: d .' .. ¢_ d 4• r t Q 7 5 t: [ .n ~ J Y •t J tL t Y H~ u 'Z ~~ gyn. -11 nln H II-• F•,J F-~'-~ Jan IJ J F'QII +.:NW . .~ J~, iluJ<I, t:)JJI-, 1, l,) Uu.f .L CI' V2 1,)q l.]~~ LLl] MU u~W .U.. - - JU Ut[L LU'YGr..- Ctn2rr ) - KW ~rvGN~ . a H r-, 1.- .~ J ~ _ H r- .a I - Z .) f Y 1- ~ , r U .• W : - ^ Q H < ., IL S!_ S ,2vt a. ~US'.J 2J<./I wt.. ']LLU W Imo' - LL.JUf. ._lU2fY-: ., ,]H¢ LY,J¢R'ZH~'i C ILW a.~l]tl ~, ,. - ,[J 'sal L- nuj.v .-.~~- Jlnc~n.n ~~.LUIr uJ\li-'IOJ ~ H G ~{ _. ~ ' tJ H n In Y ~ W ~ W L U U J L lJ lu W 1 Z < ~ I' L• _U < ~n M U n V aL • J tow ., W I :]u to ~, .> r .W m 1 O U 1~~ R' .n .J 1 H )Y U w L ¢ ~4 .u S IJ .; /1 Z Vf W '~ 'a 'Y ~ W ~ 1~- . VI F- ~C ; ' LLL~~LIII ZU JIL h'h ZLna )U U G.Y^U JJ ')I- nn - 1"t LL ~ ' I< ~ u~ i I C L u I J '1 ) h ~}J r tl L ) t) U I n ty W' n ,n - h S ~ LJ L .-J K 3 ' •~ u u H IL r< w . IJl]tL •c .- bULfa .] ]xIJLLU nLUO ~ u« Q ,1 c In J r f0 ly L] J tL' LLW~i J u L Z f~ aln.J all l~L ll~ J G<W/1'<.Jn :JO . lure .t s'+~IJ u J p .-< ... ,,Ra~~ I i .raUlJ c,/J\Y is .Ji ppp~[ow,c c~ 1-i zir <z >-<'c t i~ L 9 J n,<q.> n ¢p 1Z L' L ]' <r ,J£ Ll[ •J ~) un-a e L ¢ <ww.-. .. efc~onJ ~n n o ( i<~YJ¢a']~(Q l~la.I].. mtgmlu PV VU ULJ .a Jm i0.1'Y .I i•1 ~11t 110Y•l r. ~- YIIAH~J ~n 1"J+ n t[, 1 .r 1[\•V rv .r'n NPl tO nsL ~fW~n .n ryW ~Om J y n + i Ow n ~p{+ln ., PI m I _ ~~_`J _ ` ~ _ c ,_, • , i a J t O 1 a • 42 j 9 I I I t V I 1 ~ I I 1 li vm0 ~ •'PU\a)M aa OO U~O~r~O. OCJ~ u 6p~ )~J Pv WOO P-0rvWry VuIUK110~.J .J i. PP~ ~/U'..$S~` O rNm v .uU nsln ~ ~ J^,-i1p 1~1-`n uc: IhOOQ 1~u, p1n P1.J~ P ~ tiNJ) V J~Q :,Iu, UiJ p•r nf~w~p WNIC. .+J' WWm • 1 , J l N I ~ ., . Iq ~PU.+ `~J pF~'Ol.n t~~~ M _•Ci NIUM ~~ r_,~ f-Yi IU'.J .r ~p'T. ,WIC ~b t.J ~~~R )~_.w~ppl4u sIMpS 1s +•y .JJU ~. ~~OCI VI,).. ,CA ~~jj ~1y~' ~I(~~~.JJ004AJJfJ llr w~ KJ J,~. NN r N~ W NIr~.J .rW TV NI'J~ '+WW t/N/V 1.I tV kJ moo lq :, .../o~ul.),-.~~o opl~„~., loon C,OVCt~, .~. rluQP -• i C N , lU, 111 N ~ ll ?. { :.E I L (~1<Y .~ ~ f o I _ ' r :. ~ w ~ I, ,5 r I ~•_ 1- i.-. h r ~ QI + wl-. Ir w ,., .. / w m Z ^' ~ NI ~ R ~ ,j L ~~ 1 _ d w 1C.. .l ~ W r ti p J ~ U ' U a r ~ I ~i Q' I-.) ) C W t.l ry J1~_JL kJ NI W I tI p t tin ur - u' ¢w sw ~ w' 1 6~ w Z L L .-Q ~N LLH - Ni !C -, R .J W /1 qi _J .' W U J r J -/ N J - IJ tiI J u J, nSH rYW .b m V I ,ii w0 ~H> ", v1 J v1 ,; 2 -~XHW~. W '~S< C-i u-r .iH J .J PL¢m.J LL~<t J c trw0 fu jW U A ' i.i~<w,~[J ~a~tn .u~~w J ~.[ aw.~. i a~HW KL, _JJw Cn'x ./,.lYV6~i .~ %J f-J -Z f .I.J.L .LV +•1 •^ JI-IGLL 3 1LL,. V J < .,.y~1 ._ LL W W Lr .. ) W W > 4 - ~ -. IY W > . . '•i .J.~Iy',.. :..u02~5_ .... CC .Y p.~:-..'-m VIA i 5 z r 1 J _ G 1L1yy1 S ~r- n [~ ul J J z a _ .w+ r. ¢. a ^ 3 ~ N -wJ~~- - - L.ul-,._r. ~ J tl to a _ 1y. .. Hr/1w.: J.[LL { ~ _ IJ Jy 1 U 1 1~ C S 1 }U 6 ~K p U< I 1 ~ 2U ~ IY C ~W ryw 1 i N U ~ •an ~ m 1 d N. U - c pxJ -w I p Y - x.. ~ J' J L I JZ U ,J 1_J I)H„J J Mr.. -QSIJJ 1 _ +p WLL' i ~SHti L._ KLL J f_< I ; p J f i~ 1-• ~~ ~ J Z r u [ i J H Y Y I ~/_WWO( J UUIY ~ Jrr~<rJJ J ~J~ +JU UIY ~4 1 ~. J~iH2'W ~/ZZr-LCJ'~l W. /C~1~, .OrJGJOLnJ l 1 - '1,] J V 9 Q ~'+ ~ u C/{ ,.J r J I J J J < S J J J H Q W 1, '1 1 • l7 'J\ 1.l J: JrJ WF- •Y`'NV_l ~;}171.J • I _ J 2~ S a <Lp ~ -~- JJ 1 J Z-.ilC a-~<SWC1. L I r w.n f^ V<IY ~ 1 1-4<Q'i ~ { / -~() ' .J I _ ~~i IJpH f ~ltr- - J$ KtLiC rJ fj.0 !'1 CJIY Iy 1"'1_ •J 1 ~ J JI_I N J'G .hHtJ J -f,V WILL 0 ) rIJJF`~L J I !jW1'-]~i rninlul-,I JUC 212 i1 O. L1>y1tI25]tl I i`i n<SW r«.J JUW Wi,JJ~ U~'+~O}Lny WI JrJ..Vh-U J)JWWru `i ..~LLU'V~)~t~ LSS zz .yN W 1 1 1 I o r y .r la1 ~ J ~.~I 4 n s~ .. m ~O p e r r`~+ 1 J v v t++ . . ~.:..J L <'r -~AI Irl .O'- .\NP'YI,- u'V T') nN `~ V rrvNV~, ., t4rlal'~r -r uar ~u1 ~nN ... v~ ., n .\-r n •' Y ~. ~ ~{ ~ ~~ v J , ~ ~, t.,l I ~ 1 t ; J ~ '.' ~ i 'il' v laT : IgIV~9 i ~ ` rv ~ y ~ .. t{ ~ • f.l N ~ ry • fr ~ + YI NN , N ~~. .. . ~ .L.,. _ ~. 1 ~ - W L F W .. W '. t~ ~~i A 11 L r, - r W H _ H _ { 1. .. W 1 ... v r W ~ ~ .aa. . M. WW '^ (.I IJ LW.~`' 1 t` WI'.,` »W Y.I . C ` 1 L• •J . a FFF~t 2 i lL. G U ~ 1 U I N 1 W Q t I t I w 1 '. r Fr 1, 1 I r`( i 1 I I I 1 1 1 ~ I _ I 1 i 1 _ 1 _ 1 1 I r 1 _ I 1 I 1 ~ 1 I 1 w 1 W 1 J r 1 <1 ;~ n ± ~S O J ~ r- LL ~i .J J __ U \L 4 t O 11 1.) U Y H i !] .m11-.J r UnC ~ Q ,~H1J: ~ t Zi Fr` 4~ ~ ~ ~~ ^.• J N ,i W U J . i L N~ .~ C~ LJ J' L._ M M n - 'O.+r`> ~ _ i !UI^[i r- J 00 .. ~31a t p2W ~ L .~[r~ lJO~''+r] ._. °.L a._.J -¢1<b y:L ~RRIz ~. GfJC ~ a JW WI~~ .~~ z ~ ~c~].<i N,._ .1-<o~..I < 1pA~ J _z'!'r~„J ..n.~bTU`di .J ,a~• 41IW.1LL'_rU~c1-• Vt i )W 1_ilr 1..-v C.~ J2iw~ GQOLL s ~Z{J W\.. _ .{ ~. t r i _N~SIJ J._tJY OtJ H3411 ~ ~t~' - _~~~~••£ ,~. ~r ^c C.^ I U i ~ ( ~+ < 1 ' 1 V r .'-:J ~ W 2~ Ln J j; ~ ~ Q Z l ~ . x p. m' 1 ~ ~ O1'JV¢. p .~~~ Iv rv - tt G.i~ VSp{I Y1r .>~~ J1~ n )'. 't J.c /il n ~~ •~~3 ~) ~ ~ F<~ n ^~. VII n I1... J 1•~ ~;J i Jti~wr~i ~~ 5~~~ iR r~.t .r; '~~K J.. ] i . 1`Z 11~~ n W ~.' J i..~ .. J L7` M.~ J'j ~VI FI',L )'y nN j r-LL ] n ~YI: ~ <JLL ~ W~1 I.J •-. G~ ~J.L Y r ~ U.n J JNWW L ! J~JWI~i- ~N i ~y ] [ iC YJ .J .JJJ2 :]e. ~CLi c-~ i ~. xLL L i .pru`r., v .JOt~I,i ~ r41yA~r ~ ~ - Jr ~ T a~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~. . _ _ ~: _ - ..____. J y 1 J n J 6 ]'.y ] ,i J J tx J ) L L 1 Q ~I L .~ r o f r M!N G G V 1 I . k H k L 1 < 1 1 ¢ 1 C k < k 3 1 1 a a i 6 k <t ~, 3 1 `~~ ~1 U 1 N 1 w I U 1 1 Z J W 1 f I rl 1 J I I i i 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I i~ II u 1 ~ I J ~i 1 b 1 ' 1 I j ~_ _.1 J one u ~ ~ 1 i .Jw ~~ u ~ U '4 ~ , y =`n"f 0 lm V v Jµ~ d ~ `' A 1 ) i cu :l .< " 4.. i ., . i:.:J. r !` U oa -. . . .- . f`J .~ 11 .~: .u Y i lr c..r~ijp /~ V .y .. F) ,O ..~ . W lk5 <'~'-1 f .J mJk~,k'f'+, ~'~ or, r. f: ,,': Iq'n,~•., _.a .: N N.y V OW rl ~1 ~ q u ~ 0~ r ^ r + f l c, .. u, I ~ 4 ..r . l... . . Qrr~ ~..~ . , ;. ~ M 'v J~. ' '' H 1 N.yj .n. :r ~. py . ~ ... i I . yr ^'wtJ~ - ) hJr P@•-. iYYV~ Il -,1 ~. LL'k bl ~ ~ .+PI ~J J N.(V MirV . 00 :ar 4'~ .. .. N.µ A:.-. .. .v Kr1i.~ .-:'1ti •+•ytiy'll N r'V NkV JV:~y:V .Id~Mlr.rv rl (\~~:.1 fy (Yqk xy, i uooi . o j l . yy Jy (V . , . ... ., _,,, ., ,. oo;... oo.~. uuk- {l t N N .: /1 yl 1 i ~s W lU W - . ~ F- 1- ~. y_ ~ Z '- , ..4 ry .. I.. ...... u Yy -. u w w ~ U W~ _.c r = s W~ J V ,~J •. W U ~ VtJ • ~ - L t1 J ~ ,n< T, Q tJ .- IS .) J w : U tY I) LL U ~ i Y r- Z ~ ._ r- < t •t < V J , JO r.N L'i .,nQ J ~t 4 ~ i W'+ l Y3.'~ 1.11.: F- i ..Y-.Y Wi,~. S Olr- .~ ~ U ~- ~ ] a- .n .. .~ < Z ~ c. W LHw t .I .,~J:W.- ,-SLLH~ y tY.~ii ~ .. r L _, ¢ J ..~ ~a•-<Z = -+ u.t . c Jim ~-.~i-J ~- c¢ ~i c._ ,a ~~ ~r ywF~ _..._a~ _ ,aiu.,.t., .~.. .,~., 'u ._ , ~~ I ~ ~ 1..1 U. ~~Y C] 1- • • U< M - 1 Z U'.n +YUO +fUN - nr : C2QNa - ..W ) 2'U.n ,J xJl .. ZY -4Y .1 1 J , a r n .ZmN ] ai -1 J .. .- L N O. - q C a < ..w.y ... -<c.~l-.: - H 2 .C ^ L u . ? O L~ J f - ~ y W W - ~) ~ ~ - > 'n .~ ~ i L L L . +'1'y0a0O ., dvN.f ~.1 -r1-1~.9 ~ J•ym e' J .,V Vryl.: f V.y V . ~ L.~ _~ >- J- ,L t ~ _ 03¢ ro¢ ,UUd £ 1 Z ' C < U in V - :OUV 2~1 i N Q L ~ -~ ~ •-I H v1 N ]nl ~~ pop ¢•) : ,]Z ., ..W y0~. - L <'r ~i 1<i<<~~ ¢H NM t JL. 'tZ 2' n ~~ C c ~r¢¢rY ~ .v .. .~~aa,... . II U.LL L .Ny, YiJ J rUJJ ~JJJ .J t J < 'z x ~i < t < = :yu~) 1 ,uul~ J ~ _: C] L L ~' _ G Z Z 2 ~. Y C :. _ ! iL :Y L _ tau ~ _ i~,y iu j ~ i L C_ CLS.L •- n ~F-r1~,1 non ~ ) :o.~~r- :. n n /1 v1 n N ,/1 - tl J.71- - `~-q~r r .:.1Nr. ti..yNNJ"- . n ~ ) n ~f :S1 ~~ 1 y r.~ ~ 9 • O • -_ f- I •~ ~ , H W N _ ~ Q 2 0 , S V 1~1 ,-. .-. .~ r-.+ d'. _~UJ~ H. :. .~ .n :UN N. S N .t .WW , , - M = N a .JH 2: ^uNt 't c ~ ~u ¢ : JJ~~ .. ~ 1 N r LL ^ ~r -w~.'i 4u ~ NI i. nLtZ1zR ¢ - :. ~C n .J=W ? t ~' . Q ~ .+~W YXi L } 1- ..- U Il .i i ,~~. Him 1:LW ~')aa ~'.~.J n W j, ' i j 1 l ~~ ) 4 - H u l - Y n .i C F- { ] ~ L C c .- < ) J H _= 1~e ]` _ YL•. J J [ J .- C Ir w L L :.n .. . - V T . L u 1z l J J W [l f. ~. v O d I I t ~i ~~tiN?h'..•U IQ. I '- I .. Z 1 mm~h~W ~ Ip .~ < 1 .. O h N... p .. 1 -. m O~.p... I~r ~ ¢ ~ .. a ¢ ~•.. ~..e ' ._ t 1 y .r 31 1 m I f G I J {L' i v~ 1 L f0 QI O K.i ~.i 1' 1 .-1 N •-1 .r .< <1 vNIVNfu'V ~ 31 .. ,,~..UOU,I ,~ J 1 l/ I N v I I N z Y u 1 W W 1 h _ _ 1 ti v U •( I 1 (L 1 1 G 1 1-• .- U J ~_ 1 tJ 1 _C I K I j li , I ~y 1 r 1 ~ j 1 y t I IC I • ~ N J 1 V vl I •wu W I 4.. ~(~C Z([ll 41 i\lyq~i ' ~ L 1 ~ •W wU~~v W 1 ~<wD h 1 ~.)1--t1Y F-r ~ ~ 1 .i ~uLU UI wy J I t.c W L 2 ~S I L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 I •-.1 ~ 1 1 ~ U < I 1 I • n I ] £ 1 J[ m 2 - >: G 1 v.• vIJ L .I q i .. I- .n .• . ~ C i ~C ~ < I~ t ; f- H C] ~ i < .-• U L i i I J I ] < . ~ I ~] ) ) n _ ~ i ~ : In L u. •-~ . . . I n•) - I ,~., ~Lt_ s .., 1 I ¢ x s I . u .. ,. J I - - J ~J 1 . J J L . t~ 1 ti J ~ 0 u l << f I f 1 ~Y I 1 r 1 n Q, J 1 ~ • I IV ~ c1 n 1 ~-~ j ~ - 1.__. - I . _ _ I I ?~ i I i ~. I I I • I I fir, Y_ Imo' ' I jI L__ ~. 1 I ! 1 ~ r .. V V ~ ~ Y ..COPY 4-- ,~, ~~ M~Mr.J-Arw.VrM.• __ AI4r V.IM1 IY.. rW 1lt/r Nre.~mr. Wr, o.b AFFIeCAxfON NM AlCONOIIt W9AW IKIMf1(S) I.:YpEr51 Oi ll<FNSE S~. ' fllE NO. ~ A 6 8 s -c 3 ro: o9penm«n a :u<awl< e..rav. Corr«a vfcElvr No. Ivor e<99d-9r ~ ~ =u- ~..~. i ..rs , + ..~. ~ • sm ae®ensuLC sw,am.+a Cal. 9]ele «..m<.....:...w..:n.: I cEOC:xdvnl<df cooE mi IM mrdrwrNd M•.Fx evd+b , Ovl. IF«en dp«nbd m !o-b... iuv.d 1 NFIBf15) OE UFEICANr(01 ~ r.mp v«mn "i .ppF.d vrdr Le. ]q11 .=1-. n .YF•VF:.T::4 ]. i:l,uE\. P. i '~ tBm«.. fM.iC,A:LF. _ ', fef<«.. Dwe '', ] rY9F($) Oi ixANSACilON151 ~ fEE nV S {..r _ i Mr '4'I~IISliITRlSf('!18 i _ uJ I. NO:Iw oI M•vrVU it '' 3 Laenen of Wv~ml-NUmb« oM Sn«I v eWG'Si. .iiN:. '~' ' ~Clry wN Lp Cod. Cw•ry - 3 - i"I L. ~R1_aYY"-~« .~. iOtU iriC 'V d II h.m:w<L<mW. ! Mr pnm««'~^Id. sba. rvw el4<.av 2Yll5]Ga ': ES ^em e s<9n:a9 dadre< ' v:e. fr r,-N.mb« oae s«.« - .. .~ 1's 13i~. N~xr A•: f]px _.__ r~<q v Na.. r~~ ..« bna <wr.:<Ld al o raenr' m Na.. yaa . .:a19«a aar a «e 9romom 9r In. ~i<an,i e..«ov. cw«d Fa a. •walana,, of me o.wr<me 1 w• .gyp ~n:p•o 1F< ..(I1 I I F.olo n e 'YES" vwor p bmr v v 10 an an onw m.nr .n¢n .Irv'I M l.em.d evn el :bI epp4wnen • !] nvmmv ea•« :rol ~ev.• •mvlor.d a omwb ', n,.d vnm~.. .dl ~•v.r ail ~. ava:~fimuwl ar a___-'_ 6 Evr_~. .AI + iolaN o o M nolaM o <vl •ne ponvan< oV •A.. mAe6< M.era9e Cen.ni n q Si.'E Oi ff l BiYLAev\ Cmnry er .may ......... .... Can ..• ... e•v. . w.. ...m a w..... _ u ~ttKeNi M1Z1-a n O2N6tiIIiIi e:.,fNYr LC <' ................... ........~ .. .. ...:.... . ... .w~,.. SIGN rvF9f m_3 .. ................... ._.. _, _ _ .F]l`1 •~. .al'C[ZBCtr .~:.LC CdC'( M-4CATION EI TRANSFEROR IS si.rE Oi (B~BBO F<ti:[Li. Covnq of _._yti.~y_.. _.. ._..____._ OaN ... Id tiomplC el L<Inw ... rr.m +~~~• • M ~ p_SrOnavre el La IB l cen_ vumb.r .~F.__. __..-_~.___-._.-_-_~ Lfr~l.lEOa_ _ r]Ri A.=CALZeCt. SBC[lSpi~ _~_._-- 19 lwwae NvmF9• aM •Im ~ C'~ry and tip Code Cwnry __~ cs a1~Ztil.'n _ -iaiirt-FbeGVil-chrr- ern 1?o Va Wnte Belpre iFu Liv. Fm t4wHmexl ('x (FJy FIIV<bed - 9rwdN n«rce - i.er•s:«x war.. ........... ................... ................_cones M.Iffo ...L$,:BS........ _..........._.... 'M•..vl i«d._....... Jalda___.. ...._............ oBn.w ._._... _... .A««p Ne _....... ~_ 3S"-Ci CLAIM POp DWC6 OR IRJDIIT btu.-f- ~ • 1. Claims for death, inJury Lo person, or to peroonal property must be Ci'_ed no later than 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). 2. Cairns for damages to rea'_ property must to filed no -ater '::^.an 1 year the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). 1'p: CITT OP RApCpO CDCAMONCI ICrc,VA,eD DEA.J Y.97ELr +3~/9D MtWr ~/Jrµ Q.C. / 0 9lY~Xg39 ~i Yame of Claimant Address T Zip Phone Age Claimant wiphe5 notices sent. A"D ~G~ , 9 8L `Mw~ aee-')qnu.; it..lir Y® did damage or in Jury occur? yrC lil I9Yf A•1D 7f'Q7F'rd/iTa.L :w) b~ ~83~Y q.VD 1565 IIp6p6 did lamage or in Jury occur? 8•F 90 MG.I~ pi~A 11 A+1GNO C~'~4MW6A p0Y and under what circumstances did damage or in,Jury occur? Off! 5C~' ~ 'Nc~ Siys^ YBAi particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or • in;ury? ;Include names of amp :oyees, if known). e. C. fR/wQE QAr ,t~AR~ // /f/r-~(l~i_h.~l~,D~, J3/Si Alc 55 L/ec~,'Sr IsJ37FG7G~ ~y/2 d.7Y FI-DM/N rs T/CH7DR5 ~ cT. qA. ~ R' /N'fcKi7 Nlc ~ RE6~cA~ia.'S Cd+ICC~Ninl4 ~/~/N/Nb h d~sie/e7S ?T ~"}y ~tf3iD~t1c-<'. MFLT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any orespect ive loss, insofar as .: may be knout. at the time of the presents[ion of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amou nt claimed. (Attach estimates or bills, it possible). EMa7, uiAL -i}n Atr i AN'D Df7TRL 5S S li ~`~~ s~~'f'm0 yy r0>£T/TIMt ~,LSS CF ~ \ ~u~o xer. ~E3rOEnJCE(<: CS'LM~'Cn,'3•~t7 Yi{G/~/ a ~ roc A~)7'SY••f 1~C7fn:>rAL ~YYy •`f ,NLS~1F GNNeT DC dPLLrW7E7?i A /IS %/r~F E total Amount Claimed: S NAl~S and addresses oC witnesses, doctors, and hospitals: Jru C Y4~ss 8N9e MoYr-F Ursrl}~ga.'~Ne ~~e.l.tfewo-fi 5i7sl , r Gnoc~F~ ~ ~~ n / ~~ N~fi,[eM if r¢r~~ MMRh!STRH T-q A ~ /S.;•~a~J'~~r~+~ Date MAR 1 signature of aimant '~ i ~ w 503(u?8 )-RC(H) .s ~ngq~Y~Q~Ly y~_~~ {'/L'LL~ Rrt/D /'v Dc~ ~.; 'f~'lr c•~.Qi..'x 3; :iT/'L t-S ., /. .Dc ec Md~ /S /96'/, /P.h~c,-14> 4/'e/rne.JS,4 /SS/<L .yc ~ r ~ .2. Tt~L'/R,eY R6 /S92 K.peL /{rac r'cqun)i.~k. rf'.y FCK ,C/J,~,~; ./n C<'e fjyc/bA ,kr/T /JE r~ i~cHE C`7ce/Pa nty/ ~'~'w/T CF :ciFiCN 3: tiou' ~ly~~X /7/~2 THE STATE ~c~9R'D ~F EQ,; Rai L~FTiD.v i55.==D ^f A9Yt y /9,fj iNr P/KEAd~ tG tLFOTkC./!C lfwip 9yP</9.~'cE kt'~A/d 'SS/ED Mc .¢ .2E~if/r'' ciC ~c (w~n.'S :Dt~2//G THE FA e? ?N.}T ~i.JCc /9 J) / /'YA'D w': A'.~ED /'/ d:'S/./e~f< foe hTt:~ .i/ c~9.e abe3 /b~"D FEFCinJo- scG/f2F ,('.v1:ac'i/C- / dt+f~ N4L ~ec~-R ~e./ee~%Sr~c / [FFr ~tY P.Pcy~o/5 r-'t.¢eC e~,c ,r}yP<a YMa~.~T' R.~: D dr~'.9.' 3/ t DII~'Ci HY Oui.v' ~/i~.Jc-SS iA/ ti~'"r~=`"7'ac%~ /'JCL . /J>ecv~ry'}TCay .ldc% )jo./ /- x.,'45 dot /c~,rT ~z> rtY a-re-./-/o.J t~r}T ..:rM1S ,q1~d SRC CAB.-Y '.J ti'Oar}Tai dF Sv:-)c ~iTy BPD/./Q-a~tS, Sr:vec VAS;' c<EJTk2.~.'G Sc R~~'ecYi /3 ~"Y ~vafl S:l.~kec .7e =~E 7'yr '//O/c-HT EFiF 4oo 5..v G- IT Aa1D iN~*9it/Ty -D !~ A~'J:Pc Fi.~g4; C~,FiL A, SS i STHr C•.c 2 L'E LCCq TC= F`?5 c'W Sc D /n: DJ D ~$T~er>5 EHe~Ti ae.'AL A?Ni?a:e= 9,~5 FiN ~[cY 7r!/S~ciia D,j.'gAG c. / / rimy >,'S c'i~a.'cr r-c~E h`ti 'a7M ~,~Fi .- ~14Y•~I tra-^• 0.= ~/fce;l~ Tc A4e'Ve'x,Y to 5, ['r .4t 5~D ~~c /F~~J C.'+CAE~7 G~iM$ FP.i.`~'f Gtc D, TERS'~ / t=f~Lic~v= iHF CfTy OF k'9,t.: NL1 c','rµ.y ta'::-rF Mr,>3 A+/J r0~::i,v'rE. ~+ a= .~'Ef-L/ENT ~'Q F/F't i.t.'c- :Yi ~I:CTr FBI Mr CF 7/f F' ~fc.:~ r, w.'D Rct/c q~nefJS a.= k<u',c',~`G ,4 ,veyc t7. ~•'~''=>J, ~•'~~2 2 Yc ~t~e5 ar- HY L~{_'r NH v< Br'"Fr.i Ae si .ptcu4 •.:... T}/ Fi.~':r'.t`_ii?G ..'X ~tZ/SC-:$ ,.J Caw YEQr)i./F MY Fr RF.+G-L- iti/2 R O'.'S. /~. c-5~, a rvrmv no n ~ s.n nn nr.n ..rnvn . • • STAFF REPORT GATE: March 20, 1965 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubb s, City Engineer BV: Barbara Kroll, Engineer Technician SOB JECT: Approval of Parcel Map 9063, Bonds, Agreement and Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement located at the southeast corner of Foothill Blvd, and Hellman Avanue submitted by Lewis Development Company Parcel Flap 8063 was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on October 26, 1983, for the division of 8.66 acres of land into 2 parcels in the General Commercial Oevel opment District. The developer, Lewis Homes of California, has submitted an Agreement and Bonds to guarantee the construction of off-site improvements in the following amounts: ~,~.,....,u,l ~~ v _ ` 3 YZ !x _ ~9 e .. > 19" Faithful Performance Bond .... ..........$13,000.00 Labor & Material Bond ..................$ 6,000.00 In addition, the developer has submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement to guarantee the future construction of a median island on Foothill Blvd. RECONlEN04TION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 8063, accepting the Bonds and Agreement and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same map to record. In addition, it is recommended that. City Council adopt the attached resolutf on approving the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and authorizing the City Clerk to record said agreement. Resp ctf uliy su6fni tted, Ul.ly:Bo Attachments /J • TENTATIVE ,.nr / a, / ,HUr+ PARCEL MAPENNO. 8063 a""Y : ,.., BEING a SDEDWIGON OF THE HEST T02 FEET OF THE NOPTHiES E' HNi Of THE NGPTHWE9T ONE-WaPTER ~ TME NOPTHEP9T ONf- '1C11a1 b. TOHN9NIP I SOUTH, PGNGE T S7PTE WTATEA OF 9ND IN THE CCUNTV OF GaN BERWPIIINO. 5PN BEPNPPdNO MEAIDIaN. ~ GTUfGPNIa, yfiLl r~fS-`r~WM1W COtAJ fY HfIYER dSYf'GY A'/ ~ (/ CivNlr W/fG.f O/9Yt/L/ p ~WEI N L/L//ORS-/.1 CO ~ I_ ~~~ yCh'ELK YCC EPwpNL LO eevc~HFE` .ia e++ .q ue Iwo ~ e v e wYLroLCno.~' O '~F ~'V O rzVfw. IXv0 L ~ NOf.M.'~N'w l AvC APL/~O. r/ P~'ti I ra~T JE4T U _T-J~~ - ~~ FCGTwL'_ 90UL'Va RO _._~_-__ .. -- <3f/ -' ~ ~ it ~{~, '~ ~ • p ~ .J ~ - /~ 9n~tCEL I ~~~ / ~ ~ _ 1' I/ .~ I `~, v ,, y + vAUlrt // ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ MaNG9NRE QTR T ,9. i / % ~ ~ ~ /~ ~~ ~~ ~ '~i ~ vn<arvY C - __ ---.. ,.. Tn, nD. ~~~~~~~ 1 ~ 3083-I A-I ~i M@, 129: 1 tll..rr im d' d3-a yC 09•'.9'L5 IP13 SI4GLE FAMILY Av ClTt OF RANCHO LULANONOA 1MPROYE NENT A6REENENT FOR PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL NAP R063 NNON ALL MEN BY TtIE SE PRESENTS: That thss agreement is made and enteretl into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal [ode and Regulations of She City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Lity, and Lewis Development Lo. hereinafter referred to ds the Developer. THAT, NHE0.EAS, said Cevelpper desires to Develop certain real property in said City located on the soot hwest corner of Foothill L Netma n; and NHE REpS, said City has established certain requ+rements to De met by said Ceveloper as prerequisite to granting of fin ai apprav al; and NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and De tween the Lily and [he Ceveloper a5 follows: 1. The Ceveloper hereby agrees to constr uc[ at Developer's expense al'. imprpvemen [s desc ri oeD on page a hereof w'. chin twelve months from the date hereof. 2. This agreement shall oe effective on the date of the resolution of [he Council of Said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in tlef ault on the day follow- ing [he firs[ anniversary date o/ said apprp val unless an exten- sion pf time has been granted by 5altl City as hereinafter provid- es. • 3. The Developer may request addsti onal time in whim to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less tnan gU days prior to the default dace, and ,ncluD ing a statement of circumstances of necessity for addi lion al time. In considera- t,or. of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement secure ty, antl to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes uie rein. d. If the Oevel oper fails or neylects tp comply w~U the provisions of this agreement, the Ci[y shall nave the right at any time [o cause said provisions to De completed by any law- ful means, and thereupon to recover from saitl Ceveloper and/or nis Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. 5. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Cevel- oper from the office of the Li ty Engineer prior to start of any work within the public rl ght-o(-way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the reyulatipns contained therein. Non-compliance may result in stopping of the work by [he City, and assessment of [he penaities provided. 6. PuDli< ri ght•of-way improv emenf work requires shall he construe [ed in conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Stand and Drawings and any special CITY CLERK eEa lr-~a dr-7Y amendments th v.ete. Construction shall include any transitions and/or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or pu bl is safety Errors or ommissipns ciscover ed during ccr,struc- tion shall Se cprrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due tp said plan modifications shall De covered Sy the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7. Nork done within existing streets shall be diligent- ly pursued Cp completion; the Lity shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unj ust ifietl delay in completion, and to recover all cast and expense incurretl from the Developer and/or his cpntr actor by any lawful means. 8. ThC Developer Shall be reTp00Tible for repldCement, relocations, or remov ai of any component of any irrigation water system in co nfli-t xilh the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible far removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right-of-way. 10. The Developer shall plant antl maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Develppm ent Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished Dy the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the ap provai of the City Attorney. The prin- cipal amount of said improvement security shall not De less than the amount shown: • RESOLJTION N0. 'E@3=?B=97R~ - - • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC,NO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARf,EL "+AP N0. 8063, (TENTRTIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 8063), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, ASD IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 8063, submitted by Lewis Development Company, Subdivider, and consist inq of 2 parcels, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Blvd. and Hellman Avenue, being a division of the west 702 feet of the north l/2 of the northwest l/q of the northeast l/q of Section 10, Township 1 South, Range 7 'lest, San Bernardino County, State of California was approved ty the Planning Commission as provided ;n the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements pf Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Par rel Map No. 8063 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Ten to±ive Parcel Mao; and IJHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NO'W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as fpl lows: • 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Mac delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 8063 he and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on ~ e s, avor ATTEST: every ut e e ,ty er faa r1 U RESOLUTION N0. E63--2t~OSR A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT ANO LIEN AGREEMENT FROM LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, FOR PARCEL MAP 8063 RND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Parcel Map 8063, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Blvd. and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Company was approved on March 20, 1985; and WHEREAS, Installation of 1~ landscaped median island established as prerequisite to recordation of said map has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Lewis Development Company. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. • AYES: NOES: ABSE"!T: don D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa ~ .n ntmv nc n ~ wrn •in n • __ _ _ __.__.-,... ,,. ~C STAFF REPORT 2~~, ~ 9. =I - ~' DATE: March 20, 1985 ig;; T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubb s, City Engineer 8'f: Barbara Kral 1, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 8828, Bonds and Agreement located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow Highway and Ninth Street submitted by Barmakian Co. Parcel Map 8828 was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on November 14, 1984, for the division of 11.05 acres of land into 4 parcels in the General Industrial Development District (Suharea No. 1) located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow Highway and Ninth Street. The developer has submitted an qgr Bement and Bonds for the construction of off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond...... ... .588 ,000.00 Labor & Material Bond .......... ....544,006.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 8828, accepting the Bonds and Agreement authorizing the City Clerk to cause same map to record. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BK:ko Attachments 33 -J ~-- tt1 ~ ~ ~ ~ +S ~ E f ij ~t , ~, e ~` y .: ~ t p ~ ~ p i r f 1 c\ ~! ~ ;',catsi ii ~ h 1' } 9r-( ~ 'ii R e •f .s~,t~ty~ X 1 „ x ; 11 ~ ~:Ai 4 is l ,, 7'F~v'~j a. ~~` E's J1 JI f,..; . i ~ :~ i s ~: l --tt i y F~'fi L~.1 is~_ ~Rg~ ii ~~' id , j ~ ~ A! i ~I I ~~~i 7{ 71 EI1..~ ~~~ ~.~~... 1 ~_•_{ :I _ . tl d ~i ~ ~ 7 ~ ~: g 'n 4 9 e ~ ~ I$'j, v is [ y m m ~, CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMO NGA IMPRGYENE NT AGR EENEHT f OR kV 08 ALL 4EV RY THESE PAESE4 ii: That this agreement is made and enf erect into, in can/or Hance w~tn [Ae Dravisi ons of the Nunic+pal Code and Regulations of the Lity of Ranc hq Cuc ampnga, State pf Caiifprnia, a mu niciDal corpora son, nereinaf ter referr- ed to as the City, by and be cween said City and - _ -' hereinafter referred tp as the Oeve1DP¢r~,y i4AT, NRER EAS, said Oevelpper desires to tle velop certain rea! property in said City located ~. _.:..._ - - - one NHEREBS, saie City has esSablished tertdin repu;rem ents tp be met Sy sa,d Oevelppar as prerequisi [e [o gr ant :ng of final approval; and MNE9EA5, the execution of thfs agreement and pasting o/ improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the C i[y A[[orne y, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of sa+tl requirements far the purpose of Securing said aDpr oval. NON, iNER Ef OR E, it is hereby agreed by and be teem the City and [ne Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at develoDe is a+Dense alt improvements desc Abed on page 6 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof. 2. 'his agreement shall be effective on [he date of the resolq[ior of the CDU ncil of said City aO Prpving thi •, agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day /glloe- ing the riri[ anniversary tla[e of sa+e aDDrDV aI unless an exten- sion pf time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer may request adds tion el time in which CO COmDl2t2 [he pr0V1510n5 0/ Lh15 dgr¢¢m¢0[, In Mri ting nOL 1255 than g0 days Dripr to the default date, and including a statement of cir<umsCances of necessity for additional clm e. In considera- tlqn of such reques [, the Ci Cy reserves the right tD review the provisions hereof, in<lud ing construction standards, coSS estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adJu s[ment5 thereto when Warranted by substan[i al changes therein, 4. If the Oevelo per tails or neglect s~to comply with the prDVistpns of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any Law- ful means, and thereupon tp recover tram said Developer and/or his Surety the foil cost and esp ense Incurred in so dying, 5, Construction Oermi is shall be obtained by the Devel- oper from She office of the Llty cngi ne er prior [o start of any work within the putt is right-pf-way, and the d2 velop er shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations Con [afned (herein. Non-complian<e may result in stopping of [he work by the City, and ass etsm¢np of the penAl ties provided. 6. Publ7c right-ai-way improvement work r¢qui red shall be constructed in conformance with approved ,m pr ovement plans, • Slane are Speclficat ions, antl Standard Drawings and any sped al -l- S, F., O.R., Res., D.M. ,COP ~~ 1 FA ITNFUI PE0.FBRMAXCE Type: _-Lx. ~: 'n•-ec; Pn ~c7oa1 amo un!: ~.__, ,,.~.. Ndl^e dnJ ]0.255 Df SYrGI Jt 1•;q',-,m~: C "}:}y^;~ MATER (AL ~~ANB LABOR TYPe: :v:x. L,..::v^cr_ Principal Anpun[: 5.,,. ,.... Name dn9 aJJr°55 Of iUret): i - .YaET/~ CASH OEPLl51T~~80NUMENTAi~f OM 7YOe: Pr lac ipal Amount: Ydme lnd dtl'Y25i if a~ eOY: TB BE PBSTEO PRIOR TB ACCEPLANCE BY THE CITY IN RI THESS HEREOF, the par[i es h¢r eto have caused these prez¢n is !o be Culy eeecuc¢d and agknp le l;e ai [h alt (Yrmatiti e; re Rdired Oy 1ae on the Ca ¢s iLC tpg'P ~. os ite Inert Signature s. oat= >> 'f 45 hy~.Z ~~• .C, ~yo¢velo Per 'S~g'n ature! ' CF:L:.rs 7n....... T: Date zJ~'~~S 5~~'~LY-~ ~~~ ~n.~1.~ 4r'.:`~LCL.C,~~+_Jevelpper i qn] ure Printed Accept,.. City pf Ra¢cho Suc ampnga, Cal if prnia A Municipal Cprpor at JOn 9Y: J_, Mayor Attest: .-.- City C erb // J~~ _ a Ctty Ac[orrey 4~ry(LiN11 SfnJ{ n{ rnLlf(rII VI• ml vrnr ~ ~ L.,,,~, ws ~S Mr~uuin na~n eT, ^ .`~.Nme`m'M MnuM - ,.a... ~~~~ ^'I. m., .v .r",r.,,„,'~' /1 rr ~n n+k..{rr.'.'e sr.. .o s ~w F,.P. ,u. r. ti, "w^'..m m a,rv n il. ~~~' „ wlrvrst ~pm,m ~n~~MM1'_nrcun_~-~~ OiF(raAL SEAL 51t{R.I 41 flpf //// ~ Ila}aM WIIIF.CI Irp4N'A a ~N~ ^ { pL ~b Vr ror 91r TJ'M f.LMM1 F vrurr K~ /V , l ,_ tt 41 IJ 1}tf ~~ am endmen[s tM1e re to. Construction sM1all incl ede any tr ansiilons and/pr other incidental cork deemed necessary for drainage ar pu bl:c saf e[y. Errors or Dam anions discovered dun ng construc- tion mall be cD rrec te0 upon fhe direction of tM1e Ciiy En g:neer. Revised work due to said plan iod:fica[: on5 shall be Covere0 'Jy tnf prnV151on5 pf :his dGreem2n: and SCCUred by [ne surety coven ng the on ginal planned works. 7. 'dork done within existing streets shall be diligent- ly pursaed to completion; the h ty shall nave the ngnt tD cumOlete any and ail work in the event of unjustified delay in tom Dle[(an, and :a recover all cost and enDen se incurred from the OeveiD Der end/or nts cp retractor by any lawf ~l means. 9. Tree level ~Oer shall he res po.^siple for rep'. ac ement, relocations, D• removal of any component pf any lrr igat:on water aystem :n conflict with the •eVuired work to the satisfaction of the City Eng:neor and [he owner of [M1e water system. 9. T^e ^e veloper shall be responsible for removal of x71 loose rock and other debris from the pool is right-pf-way, S0, the ~evelDper shall plant and maintain parkway is ees as directed by the Community 0¢velopm ent Ci rep tar. 11. Tree Improvement security to he faro isned by the Oevelooer to guarantee completion of the terms of this a9r Bement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The prin- cipal amount of said improvement secure ty shall not be less to an Lne am Dahl SM1Own: • -2- • ctir of Rnnam cocawnw ENGINEERING DIVISION • ENCROACHMENT PERMIT iEE SCNEWLE For Imprev mmnC ev:e! Nin 99:9 Wta Feb ro s n' 3. teii omPuted y; ftlirR4 erence: hty Drarinq Ho. ` NOTE: Does rot irK lode current fee for rrlt inq perwlt or pavement deposits OVAN7ITY UNIT ITEM P0.ICE AwDDNT L.F. P.C.C. curb - 12" C.F, 24^ gutter 7.25 J y:a Li. P.C.C. curb - B" C.F. 2+" gutter 6,00 _ t9 L.f. P.C.C. curb only 5,50 l .f, A.C. berm 4,50 _-.3fiu S.f. 4• P.C.C. sidewalk 1.15 z. ~S9 $.F. On ve approach 2.50 S.F. 8" P.C.C. crass qu[ter (rnc. curb) 7, d0 dOp C.Y. Scree[ et<dva[,pn 1.50 C.Y. Imported emoankment LSO ~ S.G. PreDaratian o/ suograde 0.:5 m~lo0on S.F. Crusne4 a9g. base (per men to ms) U.W _yy. TON A.[. (over 1J00 Wm) '7.C0 TON A.C. (900 [0 1100 tons) JS.GU -- TOx A,C, (500 to 900 tors) 45.00 TON A.C. (under 500 tons) fiJ,00 _ S. F. A.C. (J" thickl 0.55 --- S.F, Pa[th A.C. (lrencn) 1.75 COQ. S.F. I" tM Ck q. C. overlay OJO EA. Adjust sewer men na le tp qr ode 250 A0 __ EA. Adjust sewer clean out to grade 150.00 _a EA, Ad)us[ water valves to qr ode 75.00 3 EA. Scree[ lr9nts 1000.00 • L.F. Ba rr lcades (mtprsnc. 5500 min) 1.00 ']0 L.f. 2 a 1" redw00d header 1.75 _~ S.F. Removal of A.[. pavement O. JS t L.F. RCmoVi~l Of ~tlIG;AT%%%RNRS ex at. Ca rh Basin 9YAD i3p .00 yJ~ L.F. 0.emoval at A.C. perm 1.00 EA. Street signs 200.00 EA. Reflec tp ri and Dusts )5.00 L.F. Concrete black wall 25,00 S.F. Retalninq wall c0.00 _ Jn TON Aggregate Dose 7.00 C.Y. Concrete structures 425,00 !9 l.F. 18" 0.CD (2000 DI 27.00 lea L.f. l: .:nr ua •m SSxOD !:.oo L.F, 36' RCP (2000 0)i" P.v.c. proe ABYOD a.oo _yy`~ l.f, 48" RCP (1200 Of 6" P.c.C. Prpe ~ y4%130 i.00 4 EA, Latch basrn N • ~' 2000.W EA, Catch basrn u 0' 2900.00 EA. Catch basrn N 22' '- r 4500.00 ~>_ EA. Local depress ton 4' ~ 500.00 EA. local depression l2' 1000.00 EA. dune lion structure rune. Cm ;ar 5000.C0 -~ EA. Outlet structure, Sttl a506 1500.00 En, Outlet structure, S[d 1501 500.00 EA. Guard posts 40.00 L.F. Guard panel (woatl) 25.00 ~ L f. Sawcut 2.00 _ ~ FA. Heedw all (48" wrng) 4000,C0 Lf. Redwood header L 75 _ S.F. Landscaping 6 Vn ga[ron 2.75 Lf. Roll curtr (P,C.L.) ]. ~0 ENGINEC0.ING In$PEETIDN fEE a.na9.00 SuB TOTAL '6,5aa +RESIOAATION/OEUNEAI(ON CASN !,Op0.0U CONTINGENCY COSTS Ist ~LOy OFPOS;i (AfFUNOABIE) FAl illFU1 PERfORMAIICE BONG (IOOi) ~n.On[ MONUMENTATIOM SURfiY (CASN) 1-too w LABOR AND HATE AIAL VOND (50%) aa.0o< aPursuant•ta Clty oI Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Tlt le I, Chapter LOB, adoptln9 S Bernard lrro County Code Tlt les, CNplers 13, a cash restoratf on/dellrKatlon deposit sNa w _ • nE wn inn mrnrinn rnn.a rnrtlnn Pwrm fY ~:~ :>.._ .._ FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE OONO 'HHE?EAS, :ho ,'.!y Ep un c,, 'he =ity pf pan cno :".a-,ong 1, $tdte of 7al'f ]rn.•l, and :[\T[}?'~ ._ •^, n3va _~ _•_ (h= na`;?• des':ne:ee as "o^'^•;.~pa" ' ~nt: ?n ag•ee men[ •He •?oy pn nc']a'~ ag•ees to tns:al In an^.^ L]mple certain tle s'3'3:?7 pv J1 :c in]•>veTents, em ch sa'C afire?^?n; d a!ed 198 and -~ ',eC ss NHE?°_4S. 53'1 ]•••C:p 11 :5 •'e'J••n'J Jn ^.u. a.15 Y 53'1 apreo,:en: tp `urntih 3 pen. fJr tho 31 :rf ]'. ]a^xa rn 3n.e p° SI,: agreament. NCN, i4ER E°:~E, w the p•ire'ndl and = - - __ _ ..t ~-.,::' as surCt Y, l•e hd11 ~3nd •aly ho ann unt ]~;ne~ ., :J ~~ ?dn no Cx am on3a ;her?+^.af ter ca'1=d ";'~ty";, in the ]en a'~ sum pf ~ idMf'J 'i Tp.n ey Jf the '. n'. Lee i3teS, `]r t!;e pdJ^.2n( of e ,"L n" s'J^. 'xe'1 ant truly ;o he 9dd?, 7'. n'] ]u ^se''v?s, oar he3r5, SIIC C?s:]rs, 3?LUt ]rs 3nd ddmtnt5'.^3tJr5, ]Ot9::y d01 5ev 2r a:l Y, 11 rmly Sy thPS? preSe^•ts. The cpndt [ton of this phltCat~ln is seen :ha; `f ;h? ap ]ve bpJnlOd pr. nCl]dl, hli o' 'its heirs. eieCJiJrS, a:ml ni5:r 3;]rs, su[^?SSOrs Or d55 t3n5, Sh 3'I In ail {n1 n^yS stlnh :] dn0 lh'1e pJ, and .ell and t•Jly keep and per']rr Ih= c]ven an.s, C.r. :'„'. .^5 in1 • pr pvlsinns +n [ne aai+. lg'ee ne^! 3r". 3nJ 3''er 3a pn :" ,` -a1= 35 the•2in pr]119?0, On hls p3^r t] h2^<a]; 3r] p?^fe•TeC at anC to th=~T.an •ner Ih_•a, speLtFeb, r.] '.n dll reSpe'r5 -1C ". Cr'.~i 9'~ t0 the. tr.le ;e n'~ 3n1 aein•r:. d"1 shdll IO ~e TA "y 3"d ndv? har T'~esi t;Y, 'LS ^, a'S• l':e"LS dhd ur]:Y"e 5, ds S['.pU'a.~: .no.. ;"J „ t3:']n Sn a.. h eC iT2 nJl 3n0 v9i d.r p[herN's?, it Sh ]I .-~3n1 _i Stn Jii fOrC_ and _. ~ _a. AS d Odrt Of :hE ]S`jdt'Jr 50e.: r^d Fe•aJY 3^n •n 3d9';']^ ' the f3C? aTpU n[ sp?C~fl e1 the"?for, thg r? Sha" 'Je nC1 J1e] C is anA rn350n d'dl? expenses ant fe25, 'n: 'J .1 '. n;f •e 15 Cn dh'~° L[;>rn?y'S f eps inC9rr9d Sy f,t .J 1n 5G.". CCSSfal iy unf Y.l•q'j SJCh ]C"?3:<]^, all to Ce taxed as costs ant Intl;.-, 'n dnY ]u]7m' -enco.?1, The svroty n?•eby sti p'J13t?5 3n1 ag"ees 'hat no c4;^9e, e+te^s+pn of tame, a'. ter lttnn pr aldi ttCn ;a the ter'^s of the agreement ar to [he t.orx [o be ]e•rorm?~ tha•eund?r pr ;ne zpec+- ftLat:ons accomo anying the same sM1all in anyetse affect Its ahl'gda nns b?nC, and it do?s hereby Naive notice pf any dr t"'s s JCh cn anye, extension of time, alt?•3t'tn or ndd •t~pn to the ter-.s sf Ch? a9r?e'nCnt ]" to the ee^k a" Co the soo~tfir,3:i on s. IN AIT4E SS AN°?EOF, this inst•uT ent has oeen dv1Y e.ecp [?d ty the ]n nCipal ant surCfY dbo Je nacre;, on t :'..3r. 199 I ._ ,I ~+ ~ ~>~, na0ur¢, ~IM1t'o^n?y-'n ractl - PLEASE ATT ACN POMER OF ATTORNEY TD ALL BONDS Si6N AT URES NUST BE NOTARIZED 1 -+ aYID ND. p099995 ?resist :ncl. .n x:f. &x< • LAOOR qN0 PATER LaLNEN 60N0 NHE REdS, the Lily Lounc:l of the Li :y Of ion Up Luc among a, r-- State of California, and Iherein of ter design atetl as 'y•;acip ai") nave tncg rep into ap agreement whereby pr incipol ag re!s tp !ns:dil and wnpiete certain designated pu b'. tc :-pro ve-cots, ~•,hi cn said 0?reemen ;, dates anE ice ntiri gd n di prOj e:'a FazceJ. P'dn 33i 15 nc•e+y re'er!ed tC dOd 'Id d! a par[ liereo:; ang NHERrAS, under the [erns of said spree agv, principal is rewired before enter ng upon :he perfOrrdnce pf ;h! work, tc file a good and s~f~in ent oa~n-ent Sontl wi;n the LiCy of Ran c40 C uc aaonp3 to secure th! cl a:,s to which r!f e''.nce is naEe in ii tie 15 (c0^.-encing w!th 54 c;ion 3032) pf ?ar 4 of Divi si:n 7 pf the Civil [ode Of :n! $: ate Of tai :'Orrr. 3. NON, THEREFGRE, said principal ar.d the unC!rsigned as a corporate surety, are he ltl fi •.mly hOCrE unto the City Jf gdc:hc Lut amen ga antl dll cpf.[r acCOrS, supcJnt-d::Or s, labOrq-s, mat erldlm2O dnd ocher persons QTp10 ylE In tb! JCrf Jrr'dn Le Of Ch! aforesaid agr!ea!nt and ref erreE m in the a`or!s aid :pEe of Eivil Procedure in [h! sum of f tbusaed vd /'CO Ool tars (3 44.000.00 ), Por ma ten als fir r.i sneu or Idpar ;n!r eon of any 'wind, or for ymoun[s due under the 'J n!m0:oyaent Insurance qcC with respect [a such work or 7aSor, [hat sat! su•!ty will pay the s sae in an amount not exc!eding :M1e amp unt hereinapo ve s!t far LS, dOd also 10 case su1C la OrOJnh2 VeOn [his b.ad vlll pdy in - tn!r!o/, toss and reds onEb le addition fo the fdce' amount exp enSeS dnd fe!5, iOC:JdI n,J r2350ndble dt[o Me%'S f=e S, In C'. r^etl by [fty in successfully enforcing sucn oblie_a::on, Co be aw arc!E and fixed by cne tour:, and co be taxed as casts anE co be • CncluEed in the judgment therein rendered. It i5 hereby !xpr!s;ly StliJl 3Led dnC a?reef [Ildt th15 bond Shdll snore [p LhQ Senefft Of dry dpd dll pe!S OnS, Cp'~J drl es dnd COrporattons anti tled to file 4:3ims unE!r 'itle :5 (<p ^.e ncing with Section 7082) of Pdrt 6 of Oi visor 3 of the Civil Cc d=., so ds to give a right of action to then or their assigns in any suit brow gh; open this bane. Shoo ld the contli Lion of this bOnC he~ Iully perfpr-!d, [hen this Obl ip aLion shall bocome null and vpiE, och eriris! is shall Oe and remain in full force antl effect. the surety hgr eby s:'pulates ind agrees :ha: no ch doge, extension Of time, alte'a:ion Or adds :ion to the terms pf said agreement or Che sperif stations ac~Ompan ying tM1e saa! shall in dry manner of feca its obii9aCions on [his bard, and it Coes her=- by waive notice of eny such to aPge, extension, al[erati pn pr aEdi ClOn. IN NITIaE SS N"EREOF, this ins tru-ent has been Euly ex!a teE by the principal and su r!ty above nave d, on Febrir~n':i , 19d ; DE4TIl:?FRS T4'31RaM'E :"~-Q,Y!'_ ~m`1t/ -evd Y) (Sure tY) -y _qq tgn Wret ,Mtarr!Y-in-.oat David r, BanEeY • PLEASE A7TA Cil PO NER Of ATTORNEY TO ALL 001105 S IGNATVRES MVST BE NOT q1R 12E0 37 RESOLUTION N0. fBT'20=20fC ? r / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARC'cL MAP N0. 8828 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 8828), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 8828, submitted by Vineyard West, Suhdivider, and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow Highway and Ninth Street being a division of the east 1/2 of Lot 17 and the east 1/2 of Lot 24, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 Nest was aDDroved by the Planning Commissf on as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 8828 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 6y the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: • I. That the offers for dedication and the Final Nap delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 8828 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to he filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. RYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jun D. Mikeis, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authelet, ity Clerk ,)aa v... a v •..i .v~• V1YVA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 20, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Muhhs, City Engineer BY: Barhara Kra11, Engineer Technician GV~Mpy L z j ~C Q zl / _ i Q F,I U ir,7 SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 9079 and Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue submitted by Sycamore Investments Parcel Map 9079 was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on February 27, 1985 for the division of 5.519 acres into 4 parcels in the Neighbor/Commercial Development District. Street improvements for the site have been completed. • Also attached for City Council approval is a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future construction of median islands on Base Line and Archibald. RECOMMENDATION It is reconmmended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 9079 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. It is also recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Respectfull s mitted, LBNi~ o Attachments ~a T ENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N° 9 0 79. sEx..o...,.o,~. ,,.G.~.........x..G.,,,k.. ,...,L...~ _, .v •x[x<q x4O.em i, ry M..G M„m M1GCM N.ry In[. /~ ,w Lun,I t IN THE CITY OF pANCNO CUCAMONW,CWNTY OF SAN BENNApOWO, STATE OF CALIFOpNIA _ .rrNrx U,ISf9 ScnLE V.ld \/rnui ^; ~. • \ ± 6 PAkL:L:. ~+ ~ l i Nol A FA<1 r ~ e;„,.s : .~„ " ~, ~ •. i~. I' 1. l' G ~r ~ W I ? q ?,tryl4 f : ~ ~,,.f ..l Y: ,,,, t~ i q ~,~ _, .. I\ . q ^ f ~ --- 1 .:,,,. .~ I ~ fGeN J {s .fi rn'e. i ^~ V Q T s xaN.:• 4 F r: is 1. ra~~ ;" P ec G~ 4 ; y ~~., ., P~RCnL 3 F . ~eeG .a, Ii I .• e. .n d' ~l-8A6E-~- f.... 1 '- n"~.eNb ~B L ~~""''~~ %i Gwr r ~nwnA% v11v^' ^+ v<evueo row, 4„~ntT ~Ta-lrpn 6Te n,pnR~ INVe6Tm ~M ~ti 6M\ Fau•etx Sl• CL ~MO wt'IO LAMP 4 ORIV f!"020 T GANiA Gnn, CAllf ~2lOl H2NP09i 1%•n Gr,, O/, LIF 12.11 »L tul~y.oye rev TG/G~Y-1Gy RECORDING REDUESTED BY: and YNEN RECORDED MAIL T0: CITY LLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MO`;GA P, o. ao. a07 RANCHO CUCA NONGA, [AL IF ORAIA 91730 PEAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT ANO LIEN AGREEMENT TN IS AGREE KENT, made and entered into this day of 1S_, by and be t~eeen Sycamore Investments, a Joint Venture Partnership (hereinafter referretl to as "Developer"), and the LIfY OF 0.A NCHO CULA MONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'Ci tyj, provides as follpes: YHERE AS, as a genera: cons+•ion precedent W Che • recordatf on of Parcel Hap 9079, the City requires the cons [ruction of one-half landscaped Median tsl and adjacent to the property to be developed; and YNE P.E AS, the Developer desires to Dos [pone cons[ r•~ction of such improvements until a later dace, as determined by the City; and YNERC AL, Lhe Lity is agr eeabte to such postponement provided Lha'. the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer tp construct said improvements, at np eapense Le the Li [y, after demand tD do sD by the City, Nhich said Agreem enL shall also provide that the Cf [y may construct said fmprovem en is if the Deve toper fails or neglec LS to do so and that the Cicy shall have a lien upon the real pro per[y hereinafter described as - secu rf ty far the Developer's performance, and any repayment due City. I R O., ThtREFORE, !ME PARTIES AGREE: 1. The Developer herghy agrees that he will install the onP-half :dn dsC3p? MCtlldll Island in dCCOf danf2 and COmpl lanG2 with all applicable ordinances res olutians, rules and regpla[i ons of the City in effect at the tine of the installation. Said imprOVenen [5 sha it he installed upon and along Baselino Road and A rchihaltl Avenue, not t0 exceed beypnd the centerline Of said street or beyond the front8ge of the sebj ect property eecept as required to provide far adequate drainage and tr off i< transition per City Standards. 2. The installation of said impr ovemen t5 shall be completed n0 later than one (1) year following written notice to the Oevel oper /rom the Lity to commence installation of the same. Instal lotion of Baia im pro vm en is shall he at no expense to the City. • 3. In the event the Developer shall fail or refuse to complete the in st ail ati0n of said improvements in a Cimely manner, City may at any time tbereaf ter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do sp, enter upon the property hereinafter Oe scribed antl complete said improvements and recover all costs a1 completion incurred by the City from the Developer. Each parcel createtl by retardation of said map shall be su b.i e<t to a prorated amount On a p¢r acre basis. 4. To secure the perf nrm ante by the Oevel oper of the terms and tonal [ions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment fr City of any funds which may be expendetl by City in completing sofa improvements upon default by the Developer her eund¢r, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, soil and convey fo the Lity, in trust, the following described real property situated in the City of AanchO Cucamongc, County Of• San Bernardino, State N Lalifar r.i a, to•wit: .. 2 • Parcel a of parcel Map 9079 as recorded in Parcel Map Book PaSe _~ Records of San Ber nard'no County, State of California. 5. This conveyance is in frost for the purposes described above. 6. Nor, therefore, If the Developer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things to be done under this Rgreem ent, then this conveyance shall be void, otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be consider ea and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by Lhe provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure • to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. 8. To [he extent requ :red to give effect o/ this Agreement as a mortgage, the term 'Developer" shall b_ 'mor [qa gar" and the City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the the Civil Code of the State of Larif ornia and any other statute pertaining to mortgages on real Dr open y. 9. If Iegai action is commenced to en/orce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sua which the City ii Boll tl ed to recover from the Oevelpper hereunder or to foreclose the mortgage created herehy, [hen Me prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys fees as shalt be awarded by the Court. IN aiTIIE SS WHEREOF, the Forties herecC have executed this Agreement on the day and y¢ar first above written. CITY DEVELOPER CITY OF ggNLHD COCA MON Gd, aYCAarope rxvesTlsNnN'S Jotnv venture CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation /, BY: ~.C.`~ I ~~~ don 0. Fit'e¢ls Charles Jack xarr Mayor a Jotnt venturer ATTEST Beverly a. Authel e[ [icy Clerk r r w. ~» w•~ w:.. u a a~:. « a a a a:.. a a: w. u s u+. a s STATE OF LAL IFORNIA ) COVATY OF SAN BE0.NAq DING) ss un ,19 ,before me - the untlersa gneC Notary Pub ic, personal y appeared JON p. M K LS antl BEV EALY A. AUT HELET personally knCwn to me to be the Maypr and Cify Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA,• CALIFORNIA, a municipal cor paratipn, and known to me fo be the per sans who executed the within instrument on hehaif of said municipal cprper ati on, antl ack nowied9ed to me that such municipal corporation executed iL. Nt TYEBS MY HANG AND OFFICIAL SEAL. Notary Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN OERNAR DINO~ ss On Lhis the day, of before me, the antl ersi gned Notary Public personal y appeared per sonaliy known to me ( ) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evlaence to be the person(s) whpse name(s) _ sub scri bea to Ine within instrument and acknCwleged Lh d[ executed i[. NITNESS IAY HAND AND Of F[CIpL SEAL. Notary Signature NOTE: NHEN OOCUMEN7 IS E%ELUTED BY A CORPORATION OR P0.Ri NE RFHIP,~ THE ADOVE pLKNONLE DGE ME MT IS NOT ACL[PTpNLE. A LOgPOAATIO N/PpgT NCR5111P pZNry 6NLEOGE ME Ni IS qE QUIRE O. RESOLUT IOPI N0.-E83-80-DhR ~, ~' A RESOLUTION OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAt40NGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBEP, 9079 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 9079) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 90)9, submitted by Sycamore Investments and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the northeast corner of Base Line and Archibald Avenue, being a division of "r arcel 2 of the amended Parcel Map 6651, according to a map thereof recorded in Book 92, Pages 36-37 San Bernardino County, State of Cal iFnrnia was approved by the Planning Comm ss ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 9D79 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final maD by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 9079 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y Authelet, City Clerk 'r faa RESOLUTION N0. €83-20-958 ' ' ~^ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAt40NGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY It•1PROVEME NT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS, FOR PARCEL h1AP 9079 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CI1Y CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Parcel Map 9079, located at the northeast corner of Base Line and Archibald Avenue, submitted by Sycamore Investments was approved on March 20, 1985; and WHEREAS, Installation of one-half landscaped median fsland established as prerequisite Lo recordation of said map has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement 6y Sycamore Investments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE Ii RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property [mprovement Contract and lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Puthelet, City C erk - jaa nrmv no n w ~rrvn nrrn n nrtnnrc n ~~ STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 6. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kroll, Engineer Technician GAO V~~...,~hC' 2 ~ ~~ ~; . ~: ~! ~, ~ > • ie~~ SUBJECT: Approval of Tract No. 10035, Security and Agreement located on the south and east side of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of fade Corazon submitted by Rancho Associated, Ltd. Tract Map 10035 was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on March 25, 1981, for the division of 15.7 acres into 38 custom lots in the Low Development District (2-4 du /ac). A 15-month extension was granted on January 11, 1984. An Agreement and Bonds have been submitted in the following amounts to guarantee the construction of off-site improvements: Faithful Performance Bond...........E244,000.00 Labor & Material Bond ...............5122,000.00 Letters of approval have been received from the High School and Elementary School District. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract No. 10035, accepting the bonds and agreement and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said map to record. R~:e1/c?s!/AV~ectfully s mitted, L~ Lqn: : ko Attachments ~ )~ f f .i` .~ ~;~'~ ''~ ~\ ~J~-•,,~.... \'.)~ ~ i; !;1~ (00!`x,. ~ ~3si1: H'~.§ ;H e;. .~ ;~•- .t R _~=y~ ice` ,,G ~ ,,~~~'~,\~ A -•_ `_ ,, , f`t jj ~ ~~ ~ '`,~ ~~ .. ~ r ij~i ~t ii i1 Sif 1'~I ~j. ~,e- \'~~w" '. ~`\ `• `~` -~s`• tt~cd~s ii if+ t _ ~ `i~; ~191iti~ciai~iiii~.itl~ui ~ r-! 6yY' ~~ ~, i~y~~ ~~;..;~ "`~ _~_ ~ ~ Y' ~l Rte., ~ : .•,. _ \ ~~`\:V~S ~f . ( "i . y..'r:::-vela ,,a ~~ - _ .~-'~ v~- +, `~" 3 ~ `~~~2~1`~ ~ _ \1~~ \ ~il>1r ~:.~ s~~~~i~~~ ~~~1~J~ 1~~~1~ y~i~4/'l I. ~~Ivi~~~t~~ ~.~.,..., ,,~ i ~ .~ . , rC ~ .. .. ....~ .. .. . ~J February 8, 1985 Letter of Certification of School District Capacity Within the Chaffey Joint Union High School District attendance boundaries for the following described project: Location/Description: Tract FJo. 10035 Vineyard & Foothill Rancho Cucamonga Number of Dwellings: 38 sin gle family dwellings Anticipated Completion Oa te: Feb . 1986 • The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 6 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification i; given an the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation hoard may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulation; withput priority points, The commitment cf this capacity shall ex;?re 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall validate such conmitment. ~''svFermrten('A'sst--Snper4ntenczn~`t° Administrative Assistant ca Planning Division City of Ranch r, Cucamonga • c~ = ADA11115TRAT1 ON Frank A. Costa, fir., Ed D. ~[ ..,,»r.,~vryl ~ v ~ ~+3"S ~ ~ag nr1^ '~ a ~ ~ ~4 06tncs Suprmlen Cer.[ M Ci h A ,r31 f 3 ~1 'a.,11b MJi ':v aJ 1 1 ea9 . ary n C Jo A55:5:]nl SupCn nt Pnaen(. 1'^rS Unnel 9:i7 Foothill Coulev a:J /Rancho Cucam on;a, Cal!`. orniz / 01 .) 9fl9-9141 Thomas W. Garneaa "cd. D. 91730 , Asvsta n15uperl n[en Cent 9usin ess Services February 27, 1985 ' Date L~1"i ES OF CE?'ifF?CA,IO`: EC SC}iCOL D*ST^,:C :' ~dP..tC:TS. N'i'~.h in Cea trs 1. ECi;no1 District end Central School District attend once uottn dories for eh? fc11 ;•..+n¢ descr i~oed ;:r ej xt: C'o ve la ter RANCHO ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PAATNEABHIP I ,cote Gn%DeFC :-`^[ion TRACT M-10038, SOUTH 6 EAST OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLCB DRIVE, SOUTH OF CALLE CORAZON Atlaber of D~de ll ink L'nits 38 SINGLE FAh1I LY HOhlEH Antis i?aced Ccnpletirr,: Data °EBAUtsRY 1986 . Gect:o.._,.. The Central $choot Dis;ricc heresy certifies thzt it gill provide capacity for 2~2 ~ studar.ts in grades l'--4 1i:ing in i;ousing units co he construe COd :n the above ;esider,tial develooc.e:a. This ter tiiication is gi'. er, on the con dtticn thou :) The developer and dis.ria hive eseccted [he "dgre=Went for Eina ncing °u JiiC Sc hrel Pat i]ities and os table sh ing Fees for Such Facilities" and 2) TF:e d eveicper ca nt irm es [o comoly with [he terns and co nA.it ions of the :1R ree,^..e nt. The comae Cr:e nt of this letter sha 11 e:cpire one hundred and eiQh t7 (1fi0) days from the date of this lec;er or at 12:01 a.s. AUGUST 27, 1985 This Letter of Cer tiEite tion for School Discr ict Capacity shall he nonassignaSle an; all assignor^nts a.re Wale and void. Appro vai of the issuance of bui l~lin; pr.raits h•+ [he City of ',acc'no Cuczmonga ;+ithin the i90 day period shall caiidato :Ir.h co¢~i[teat to t'nis developer. Six ereiy, ~~~~~~ Frank d. Cost r., Jr. Su perinten!eat 3/8L BOARD OF TRUSTEES Lawrence W. Dutton hmeh L Wright Richard C. Ale sanAer pck McRelrey Ruth A. Musser nr..Lm M1nrL rr...,,, ,. u... n.r MrmMr ~,_, ~.u/ CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT VICTOR A. OHERBA K. JR.. /'. •.~e•ve March 8, 1965 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P. O. Box 807 Ra rcho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mrs. Barbara Krall Gentlemen: vm•.r...~e.m ROBERT NEU FELD 5<e•r(n.v. Lmewl Flnnnpe, LLOYD W. MIC HAS Dimrte. EARLE R. ANDERBON BEVERLY E, BRADEN CHARLES A. WEST Rancho Associates, Ltd., Developer of Tract No. 10035, Situated in Rancho Cucamonga, has deposited with this District Letters • of Credit and utilities Improvement Agreements for the waterline and sewerline construction foz said Tract. These documents are being accepted by this District in lieu of the standard bonds, and as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. The waterline and sewerline improvement plans for this Tract have not been approved at this time. Yours tzu ly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ,~2<: C//~y ~,~ ,t Betty f"ien Secretary b cc: Rancho Associates, Ltd. • CI7Y OF RANC NO CUC ANONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREENENT FOR T0.ACT N0. 10035 KN 08 ALL NEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the SvDdivis ion NaD Att of Ch¢ State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, Dy and between Said City, hereinafter referred [o as the City, and Rancho Assoc to ces, Lid. hereinafter referred to as the Deve lover. NlTNE55ETH: THAT, NHER EAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the conditionally apvrgvetl Subdivision known as Tract No. 10035; and NHER EAS, said CiCy has established certain requirements to be met Dy said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said Subdivision generally located southeast of Red Nilt Country L1Ub Drive, South of Lalle Corazon. N O'd, THEREFORE, it is hereby ag road by said Cify and by said Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Develop ergs expense all improvements described on Page 6 here- of within twelve months tram the effective date hereof. • 2. This agreement shall De e/f eGtive on the date pf the resolution of the Louncil of said Cifv apprpvinq this agreement. This agreement ib all be in default on tho day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval mess an exten- sion of time has boon n _•!¢! by sa iu' Ci :y as nerein of ter prpvitl- !d, 7. The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. Such reque s[ shall be Submitted to the Clty in wri(ing' not less than 70 days before the exDir anon date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitat7nq the extension of time. The C7 ty shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, Includ ing the construcilon stand arcs, cast estimate, and improv amen[ security, and to require adJus4m ants therein if anv suDiCan Cial change has occurred during [he term hereof, 4. If the Developer falls or neglects tp comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shalt have the right at any [1me to cause said provisions tp be met by any lawful means, and tnereu von recover from the Developer and/or his suety the f Ull COS! dnd pxpPnSe 10[urrGd, 5, The Developer shall prpv tde metered wafer service !o each tot o/ said deve lopm¢nt in accordance with the requlationi, schedules, and Tees of 4he Cucamonga County Nater DiatN Ct. 6. The Developer shall he responsible for reolacemen t, relocation, yr removal of any com ppnent of anv it rigation water s ysten in conflict witn cons! ruction of required improvemen is to the satisfaction pf the City Engineer and the pwner of such water system. 7. Improvements r¢nuired to be constructed shall con/orm to the $tandartl Drawings and Standard Spetifi<atlon5 p/ [he City, and to -1. the improve men[ plan approved Dy and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Said i.m prov oments are tabulated on the Lpns truction and Aond Estimate, hereby incorporated on Dage 6 hereo/, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by Dumber. the Oe Velpp2r Shall a150 bC feSp Onsib l< for CpnstYV[Li On of any transitions or other incidental work he rood the tract boundaries as needatl far safety and proper surface drainage. Errors Or pmmi55ip05 di 5C0Vef¢d dVr~pq Con5tr0Ctlp shall be corrected upon the direction of the Citv Enqineer, Revised work aue to said oleo motlif ications shalt De covered Dy the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 8. Lanstru c'fon permits shall he oht ained by the Developer from the office of the City Enqineer prior to start of work; all regulations Its led [hereon shall be observed, vitn attention given Lo safety procedures, control of dust, noise, pr other nuisance tD Lhe area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with to is s<cti on shall be subject to the Denalttes provided iheref or, 9. The Developer sh ail be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights-af.way within or adjoining Said development resulting from work relative to said development. l0. Nork done within eaist ing s[reeLS shall be diligently Dur SVed to comp letlon; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of vnjus tffied Belay in completion, and [o recover all cost and expense incurred tram the Developer andjpr his con tr ac tar by any lawful weans. • ll. SaiC Developer shall at all tf mes follow inq Aed is ati on of the streets and easements in said svbidiv isipn, uo to the completion and acceptance of sold work or improvement Sv said City [punci 1, gfve good and adequate warning to the tra velinq DuDlic of each and every dangeroos condition eaistent in said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public /rpm such defective or dangerous conditions. Untfl the completion of all impr pvements, herein loco roorateA on Page 6 to be pert or metl, each of safd streets not accepted as improvements shall De under the charge of safd Develooe r. Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street su0 ject t0 the COndl [i pns canto inPd in a t<mpprary 5[reeL C105 Vr< Dlrmlt, 155u ed by the City Engineer, whenever It is necessary to protect [he public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to De made. 12. parkway trees requfred to be planted shall be plan teA by the Developer after other fmprovement work, grading and cleanup has been completed, planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagr em approved by the City Community Devel op men; Director, the Developer shall be responsible for main taininq all trees planted in gooA health until the end of the guar anieed maintenance period, ar far one year after planting, whichever Is latrr. IJ. The De v¢Inper is re~ponsib le for meeting all candit Lpns established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Rct, City Drdianc es, and this agree me r.t for the development, and for the maintenance of all improvements wnstn,<ted thereunder until the Improvement is acceotpd for maintenance Dy the Clty, and no improvement security pr ov idetl her einwith shall be rely aseA De/ore . _2. such atteuL ante unless o[h erwise Drovided and authorizeA by the City Council of the City. 14, This agreement shalt not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with [be required improvement security has Eeen submitted to the City by a successor to the he ref r, named, and by resolution of the City Council same has Eeen accepted, and this agreement and the tmprovem¢nt security therefor has Eeen released. 16. The improvement sac ur Sty to be furnished by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptaEle by the City Attorney: A. io secure fat Chf al performance of this agreement. 1.A Eond or bands by one nr more duly authorized corporate sureties in [he farm and Content specified by Government Cade Section 66499.1. 2.An [mOrav Amen[ 6ecori[y instrument in the form and content spec iifed by the City ' Attorney. 3,A deDOSit Mith the City of money or negotiable bands Of the kind approves for Securing deposits a1 wb!te monee t. B. To secure laborers and mater talmen: 1.A bond or bands by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and . content tpecif ted by Government Code Section 66499,1. T. An improvement Secu ri[y InStrumen[ in the form and content spec iffed by the City Attorney. 7.A deposit witn Cify Of mnnev pr negDtiah lp bonds of the kind approved for sccurinq [. A cash deposit with the Li[v to qu grantee payment by the Developer Ip the engineer or surveyor whose Ceres fica[e aopears uDOn the Ffnal Map for the setting of all boundary, lot corner, and ,tree[ centerline monumxnts and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the C1ty. The amount o/ the deposit may be any amount cer[if fed by the engineer or surveyor as ac ceD[able Dayment in full; or, if nD value is submitted, [he cash band sha 11 be as shown on the Construction an0 Bond Estimate can tamed herein. Said cash deppsi[ may be refunded as soon as procedure permits after receipt by the Cfty o/ the centerline tie notes •nd written as5ura nce of payment in fell from the enq sneer ar suryeyDr. D, The required bonds and roe Drincipat amounts thereof are se[ forth on Dagp 6 oT this agreement. 16. the Developer warrants that the imorpvements ' dP.S Cr1hCd in [h15 agrP.pment thdll by frCC from de (ec t5 in materials and wprkmanship, Any and all portions of the impro ve• men is found t0 he defective within one il) year following the data on which the Improvements are acceoteA by the City sh atl be repaired or reDlated by Developer free Of 'a I1 Ch r t a ges p the -). City. the Developer shall furnish a maintenance gvarantep security in a sum eoual to Sen percent (1057 of Me construction estimate or 3200.00, whichever is greater, to secure the tai to ful performance of Ozvelope is ohlipatip ns as described in this para- graon. the maintenance guarantee security shalt Also secure the f aithiul performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do specified wort with respect to any parkway maintenance assessment df strict. Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvement security OescribeA ~n this agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise author) zed by the Subdivision 4ap Ac[ and any applicable City Ordinance. 17. That the Oeve7 oDer shall take out and main[afn such puClic liabilf ty and property lama qe insurance as shall protect him and any contractor pr subcontractor performing work covered by tMS agreement from claims far pr overly damages which may arise because of the nature of [he work or /ram operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himsel/ or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employetl by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Oev elaDer or anp contractor yr subcontractor or anyone employed by said Oersanz. The pubitc liabi if ty and property damage fn surance shall list the City as additpnal Insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all inivr ante policies Issued hereunder shalt so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance 511411 bP d5 fO11ONt: . A. Contractor's liability fnsurance providinq bpdiiy injury pr dea [h liability limits o1 not less tha $300, DDO far each person And 51,000,000 fur each accident or occurrence, And pr ooer[y damage liability limits of not less than $100,000 for each acctAent or occurrence eft". an aqg regate limit of $250,000 for claims which may arise from the overations of the Developer in the performance vi the work herein provided. B, Au tpmob ile lia biiity Insurance covering alt vehicles used in the performance of this agreement providing bodily Injury liability limits of not less than 5200,000 far each person and $300,000 for each accident pr occurrence, and Dr op erty damage 11ab71fty limits at not less to an $50,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate o/ not Less than 3100,000 which may arise from the operations of the Deve iooer or his Contractor in performing the work provlAed for herein. 18. chat be/ore the esecut ion v1 this agreement, the Developer shall file with the Ctty a certlffcate or [Crti/fcdLeS 0/ insVr dote COVering [hp Sp P.Cif ipd inSVrdOC2. [dCh such certificate shall bear an endorsement precluAtnq the c ancelt attons, or re Auction in coverage of any policy eviAences by such certil;c ate, Aefpre the eaoiration of thirty (901 Aa yt after the City shall have received notification by re95 rtereA mall tram the insurance carri_r. hi evidence of understanA lnq the provisions coot alned herein, anA of intent tp cpmpiy with same, the Subdivider has submltteA the Poltgwfng described fmpr ovement security, anA naz off laeA his signature hereto: -a- FA ITNFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Letter of Credit Principal Amount: 5244,000.00 Name dnd address 0( Kann. Pac if LC NaC tonal Dank 4665 !Ia cA[r hur Cou[[ Vevpo rt 0each, Ca. 92560 MATERIAL ANO LABOR PAYMENT Typx: Principal AmDUn[: 5122,000.00 Name antl aad ress Of Snnk: Pac [f IC Na[foml Bank 4645 >menrt hur [Dore Nevpore Beach, Ca. 92660 C PSN OE PO5IT NOXUM ENTATION Tyve: casx Principal Amount: 5 3,950.00 MAINTENANCE 6UARA NTEE Type: Principal Amount; S 24,400.00 Ydme dOd addrC55 Of Su rpty: TO BE POSTER Pq IOR TO ACCEPTANCE 0Y 7NE CITY IN NITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and a<knorledged vith all formalities re gufred Dy law on the dates s¢t forth ~~te their aigndtur05. Developer; RA.tlLVO ASBOC tdTESr a lfornia ^General Pa'r rsh lp By: F'es[¢[n Oev Amen C Partner Date ,3F F- ey: ~ % - reorge U. to send, Pao aer Oy: tan Cl ev/e SnA~UZ[/l/s, Par r/ner pate 3~/ 5~ sr: ~Y / L~^~ `~CN~~ Rv sse 11 C. van Cleve, Pre sfden[ Accepted City pf Rancho Cucamonga, Catifprnla A Mvni<1Va1 Corp¢rdttpn Ry; Mayor Atpns[: L tT ri PpprDVed DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE NU ST RE NOTARIZED •B- CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION • ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDDLE For Imp rovemen [: Oate: r . Compute y: File Re erenc e: 4 TR 10035 ~ City Orawi ng Np~~ Y92p~T NOTE: 0pes not include current fe¢ for writing permit or pavement deposits OUANT ITY UNIT ITEM` PRICE ANODIIT L.F. P.C.C. curb -~12" C.F. 24" gutter 7.25 %_~ n0 L.F. P.C.C. taro - A" C,F. 24" gutter fi, 00 5 zo eon L.F. P.C.[, curb only 5.50 L.f. A.C. he rm 4.50 i5_~siT S. F. 4" P.C.C. siEewalk 1.75 3].3a4.+c 40e S.F. Drive aPP roach 2.50 i.nzn an s4o S.F. A" P.C.C. cross gutter (inc. taro) 3.40 a xcs.r~ i9 e, 9Pe, oo C.Y. Street ere avaHon 1,50 39.4ao. no C.Y. Imported embankment 1.50 sy_ S. F. Preparation of su ograde 0.15 4,4c o. nn s ooo S.F. Crushes egg. Dose (per inch thick) 0.07 v.sso. rn __ i0N A,C. (over 1300 tons) 27. C0 __ TON R.C. (900 to 1700 tans) 35.00 _ TON A.C. (500 [a 900 tons) 45.00 `- TON A.C. (under 500 tons) 60,00 etf`>6 S.F. A.C. (3" thick) 0.55 34.41fi eo S.F. Patch A.C. (trench) 1.75 , _ S. F. 1^ thick A.C. overlay 0.70 EA, Adjust sewer manhole to grade 250.00 sns~.ro EA. Adjust sewer clean Pu[ to grade 150,00 10 EA. Adjust water Valves [o gr atle 7$,00 isd.ro is EA. Street lights 1000,00 L.F. Aarricaees (inters ec. 5500 min) 1.00 L.F. 2 x q" redwood header 1.75 avo S. F. R¢moval of A,Ct pavement 0.35 94.59 L.F. Removal of P, 0.L. curb 3.30 L.F. Aem9val of A.L. berm 1,00 4 EA. Street signs 200.00 nod. ou EA. Ref let tp rs and posts 35.00 L.f. Concrete black wall 25.00 S.f. Retaining wall 20,00 TON Aggre9a to base 7,W I(kK'c FA. )DpflgX'CBI)BI:0001WrA1t 4anhole A ]f71~ 3900 4.00000 L.F. 1A" RCP (2000 0) 29.00 aTc z7z7 L.F. 24" qCP (1500 D) 35.00 Z9,4a 5.00 L.F. 3fi" RCP (2000 0) g9,00 L.F. 4A" RCP (1200 D1 76.00 a EA. Catch basin H = q' ' 2000,00 6.000. o0 i EA, Catch basin M ~ e' ' 2900.00 s.eo9.9o EA. Latch basin M • 22' 4500.00 a EA. Local depression 4' 500.00 t so9 oo 3 FA. Local depression 12' 1000,00 . . 3.oeo.eo EA. Junction structure 5000.00 5.009 no Eq, Outlet structure, S[d l506 1500.00 , EA. Outlet structure, SId t507 500.00 EA. Guard posts '. 40.00 L.F. Guard panel (good) 25,00 L.F. Sawcut :~ 2,00 _ EA. Headwall (48" wing) g00G.00 L.F. Retlwoad headrsr 1,75 `- S. F. Landscaping G irrigation 2.;5 - L.F. Aoll curb (P. C. C.) 7.50 TF, L3 S. F. Ora inage svaAe 3.50 13,900.00 FEE ~g,,305 SUB TOi41 LN LASN 1.000 COtIT ING ENLY COSTS '31 a FAITHFUL PE RFO0.MANCE~BONO (I00%)ga44 ~~, CASH) ,."g50 f± LAAOR ANO MATERIAL BOND (50%) y, 22.00 ., •Pursuant to City ^/ Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title I, Chapt¢r 1.0A, adopting San Bernardino County Lode Titles, Chapters 1-5, a rash restaratton/delineation deposit still De made prior lb Issuance of an Engine~rsing Conslructl on Permit. a -6' • ~i. p. C:~ ~i G ;l ~ ~E ''r ~~. "' l ~f DATE & PLACE OF ISSUE: ~, alAl~~ ISSUING BANK NUMBER: March 6, 1985 PNB q 10042 Newport Beach, California BENEFICIARY: ~~~Y~RI~ RanchoEASSOOC iateOs F.Ltd. City of Rancho Cucamonga ~K DATE S PLACE OF EXPIRATION: IN THE AMOUNT OF: March 20, 1987 $244,000. U.S. Dollars pacific National Bank 4665 MacArthur Court Newport Beach, California We hereby establish and issue in your favor this credit, which is avail- able by acceptance and payment of your draft (s) at sight, drawn ~. Pacific National Bank, 4665 MacArthur Court, Newport Beach, California 92660, bearing the date and number of this credit and accompanied by your written and signed statement that Rancho Associates, Ltd. has failed to construct the improvements described in the Improvement Agreement between Rancho Associates, Ltd, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga For Tract No. 10035 by the date specified in the Agreement, or has otherwise failed to faithfully perform the Agreement. This Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits ( 1974 revision, International Chamber of Commerce, Paris, France, publication number 290 ) and engages us in accordance with the terms hereof. We hereby engage with you that all drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this credit will be duly honored if drawn and presented for payment at this office on or before the expiration of this credit. The amount of each draft must be endorsed on the reverse hereof by the negotiating bank. The cumber and date of the credit and the name of our bank must be quoted on all drafts required. PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK L cry L. Luckey ~- xecutive Vice President i BY: ~ (~j Al Fujim~ Vice Pre ident 4065 MpcA4our CoW, 70 Boe 7400, Newport Beocn, COIAOmi0 97660 ~N4) B61~103J _ ~ DATE & PLACE OF ISSUE: ~ ISSUING BANK NUMBER: March 6, 1985 PNB # 10043 Newport Beach, California ~M~/! BENEFICIARY: ~0~ppw~ry~~q ~y~` ganchoEAssocOiates• td. City of Rancho Cucamonga oFY\K IN THE AMOUNT OF: DATE & PLACE OF EXPIRATION: $122,000. U.S. Dollars March 20, 1987 Pacific National Bank 9665 MacArthur Court Newport Beach, California We hereby establish and issue in your favor this credit, which is avail- able by acceptance and payment of your draft (s) at sight, drawn on Pacific National Bank, 4665 MacArthur Court, Newport Beach, California 92660, bearing the date and number of this credit and accompanied by your written and signed statement that with respect to the improvements ii described in the Improvement Agreement between Rancho Associates, Ltd. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Tract # 10035, Rancho Associates, Ltd. F.7 has failed to pay any person described or referred to in Title 15 ( com- (•'} mencing with section 3082 ) of the Civil Code of the State of California ~ for materials furnished or labor performed of any kind, or amounts due ~~ under the unemployment insurance act with respect to such work or labor, ^;,~' including reasonable attorney fees and costs in the event suit is brought •-• by any such person. ~_: C' , {~ The Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Ctis toms and Practice for ~; Documentary Credits ( 1974 revision, International Chamber of Commerce, `••` Paris, Fzance, publication number 290 ) and engages us in accordance with ~{ the terms of this credit will ba_ duly honored if drawn and presented for i-^i payment at this office vn or before the expiration of this credit. The ;y~ amount of each dr. aft must be endorsed on the reverse hereof by the neg- ?bi otiati ng bank. The number and date of the credit and the name of our bank ~~ must be quoted on all drafts required. :r. ~'-. ~a PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK ~~ BY • ~) ' fs 2~ f~,jfq BY: rr}• Luckey Al Fujim fixecutive Vice President Vice President • 406 MacA~l+ur Coud, PO Boe 1400. N,wvpon BeacR Cahbmia V1o6U p14~ B51-0OJJ • RESOLUTION N0. ~^,:~^0-1i^,r .,~ A RF.SOL UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ;, ~F RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEME,i AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 10035 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 10035, consisting of 38 lots, submitted by Rancho Associates, Ltd, Subdivider, located on the south and east side of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Cor azon has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6y said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Finai Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is . approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same an behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 19A5. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: don 0. .-0ikels, Mayor ATTEST: Bevel ~ly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA`LONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1985 T0: Lity Council and City lAanager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Bonds, Agreement and Final Map of Tract No. 11893 located on the south side of Banyan, west of Sapphire submitted by Plaza Builders, Inc. The attached Bonds, Agreement and Final Map of tract No. 11893 are submitted far CSty Council approval. The project is a division of 17.Z acres of land into 36 custom lots located south of Banyan and west of SapDh ire Street. The subdivision was tentatively approved by the Planning Commission on March 24, 1982. The Bond amounts submitted are as follows: faithful Performance Bond ........ .... ...5258,000.00 l ahor and Material Bond .......... ..... ..S1Z9 ,000.00 RECOMI~NDATION It is recommended that City Council adapt the attached resolution aPProving Tract No. 11893, accepting the Bonds and Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign on behalf of the City. iy yGhmitted, Attachments ~, • i ~- ~, III I'. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ T-~il~,I ~'~`~~. 1 I I I ~1 I I !~ \ +,r s~ _- ~ _ ,~,_~~ - \ \ -~ -- -~~ L ~ ~\~ h, (toTecT~` ~` - - '~ '4 C,T; ~ SIT ~ ~ - ~- \~ \ I --- ~- ~ .__J_ _ -~' ~ - I" 'I; 'I I' _~ title; preen ~i~t^ ~~~.,,-' CITY OP RANCHO CI CA\IONGA i ~ ~`~~:, TRacr ~!I *~~,ri~%' ~p EN(;INGGRING DIVISION ~~a Qn ~~~> VICINITY hl.\P ~ 8 a e ., ., ~ PLAZA Elll11.OEJiS. ".J IwCOPPORATEO 9181-A Ai nvav A:e~ue Cosa S!esa. Ca'~~lorn~a x2626 ]ti 662~J100 February 13, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga City Rall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Tract 11893 Plaza Builders, Inc• being [he owners of the above referenced Tract located within the Cicy limits of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby request to have said tract annexed to [he City's Stiee[ Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Distric ,.. Sincerely, orge R. Meeker, Jr. • Plaza Builders, :nc. GkL`1: kea A Snb;r'~, e.rv :.: r, ,.d^rr:n r^^ar n 59v:r,u vrJ Lc~n Assoual:on CA4NT OF TEMPORARY EASE'tENT FOR STURM DRAIN CONSTRUCT ION Ot'ER LOT 12 TRACT 9750 the undersigned, as owner of Lo[ 12, Tract 9350, as per !lap recorded in Hook 197, Pages 68 through 72, inclusive, records of San Bernardino County, does hereby gran[ a temporary easement over said Lo[ 12 for the construction of a storm drain with in an existing 30 foot easement, as shown on map for said Tracr 9350. The storm drain shall be construe [ed in accordance with the plans and specific a[io ns as approved by [he City of Rancho Cucamonga. The owner shall be notified three (J) days prior to scar[ of eons[ruceion and Che work shall be diligently pursued [o completion. In no event shall said construction ex[ead past six (6) months from scar[. The surface of the lot shall be returned as close as practically possible [o its previous natural state and all fill shall be inspected and certified by a pro [e ss Tonal Soils En gineei. Any deviations from [he approved ?lans . encoun[e red during construction shall 6e first approved by the undersitned in yr icing. ~e Blan con • GRANT OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT ,k AGRH[MENT FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES OYER LOT 13, TRACT 9350 '~ Bohn R. P'lorance Jr. I,K7i 6MCC>`Xd7C791M, the undersigned, as owner of Lot l3 of Tract 9350 as per plat recorded in 6ooi 137, pages 63 through 72, inclusive, of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, do hereby grant a temporary easement over said Lot 13 for the pur?ose of recons!rueting portions of Peridot Avenue in conformance with street improvement plans approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and to my satisf.ction as owner of Lot ! 3. The work to be performed on and adjacent to Lot 13 shall consist of the following: 1. Remove existing temporary A.C. berm and A.C. pavement. 2. Construct concrete curb and gutter. tf/ k k3E7F3AE!(3E6Fd[1E#!(3E3F.K9F3I3AMM1(X (j"~l v. Construct A.C. pavement. 5. Regrade lot to join new street and walk. 6. Relocate street light. 7. Cons true[ drp:cway approach. 3. Extend existing driveway to new driveway approach. 9. Install and match existing around cover (i.e. grass, ivy, etc.) within construction area and extend any existing irrigation necessary for the maintenance of said ground Inver. E%CEPTIONS: If, at the time of road construction, no landscaping improvements • have been made to said lot by its owner, only grading will Se provided by the developer to match the existing pad grade with the scree[. The intent o[ this easement and agreement is to provide for uniformity between the (root yard, as it exists a[ the tune of construction, with the proposed street improvements. The owner shall he noti(ied,Cc%0@{QOg ,lays prior to start o[ cons [ruction and the work shall be diligently pursuedZ-o completion. In no event ` shall the above described work take longer than 90 days. ~'~~ ~ II ~ /t_~ in writing, thirty (30) I I~ (/ ~i .) , , ' : :~ ~~ 7D76MttF~4~%'Mdf6t John R. Florance Jr. ~// / ~y i~ ~ -~ ~E~ i~ P• ,~,jn,~ / V ~G~G ~cD s • ~uBL ~NC , • Alta L~~a ScI~®®~ I~istpact 93;O~F baseline Rom1 • Posl Orila Box }70 • Alu Lama, Calilmnia 91701 • )14/907 0766 JOIIN 6, McM U0.T0.Y Supronttndmr pLOTO M. STO0.K Prreonnd/Suppop SrMra STACY NELSON Busmess SrMrn AIILLY STRAIN Cumrulnm/Sprda! lro7ra: Fsldbliahrd InbS _Octobcr_~2~. 1981__ UaCC IIIIA411 Or TPUSTELS HOIV RTS t'HOSt RUIILRI IC L\PVLU~bV MNti I1] G.11 LAIIINI AW] pr\\114M1 A. OLIILt ,ItJllu C RUDE hF:'!'TIiR OP l'8R'I'TF LCT:'1'I ON I`OR FCilrt0l~ D7 S'I'kiC'!' CAPA('I'I'1' ['or Residential Construction within t.ha Alta Lcmn School District,. DGVELCPER Plaza t3ui lders, Inc. TRACT NUhID F:R 11995 Lnr'.\'f I!)PI South side of eanynn, tticst of 9apphi rc, Lots I-39 N UDI141i I; OF UIJp:LL1NC UN 1'1'S 55 Single Family Dx'ell inks . AN'iLCI}>A'1'4:D CO+1D Li:'C10N DA'PL•'J_ June. L9$S Gent 1.~men 'Che Alta Loma School District hereby certifies that the capacity for 21 stu-ien is will be provided within - 2A months of the culnpleC ion of thu above project. This certification is yiven on the cnndit ion that the StaCe of California continues to fund the provisions of the heroy ['. Greene i,ease/PUrchaso 7rct of 7976, or any suc- cessor Act, in such manner thaC the State Allocations [7oard may fund all school bui llliny pro}ects under its rnrrent rules and reyulaC ions wi Lhout prirlr ity ho int ,. The commi Cment of this capnciLy shullexpi.e 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or tho is5udnce of bui ldinq permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonya within Chat 90 day per in~7 ;;hall vat idato such - coiu:ni tmcn C. /{> /' .tit die P., ..\rl+un Adm rn ist r:rtur of Rumness Sc rv ices • jh cc: Planning Division, City of Ranch ~• Cucamonga (o ~, ~v~~:~l i ~ ~l+Jii~9 '~~~~jJ,~j iifi7i'~ :~s~~l~~~. 'ii~a; .li~.~ ...,.. ~ ~ J yi ,~ .. October 22, 1984 Letter of Certification of School District Capacity Within the Chaffey Joint Union High School District attendance boundaries for the following described project: Location/Description: Tract No. 11893 Banyon and Sapphire Rancho Cucamonga Number of Dwellings: 35 single family dwellings knticipated Completion Date: June 1985 • The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 6 students will be provided within 24 months of the ccmpletion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The ccmmitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of thfs letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of buildinc permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall validate such commitment. ,... .. 3~wervi~nt~ender+t/Asst. Superintendent - ~by Dianne Allen cc: Planning Division ~L@..A).Ai~Q~~_ City of Rancho Cucamonga • ~ ' ` Vin~hrnd,nt C ROBERT NEUFELD ~y/ Se<rtlnrv.Q,11r101 Alnwo CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MICHAEL Onnlun `%<' ~'• "'~'•' -~, " ' ~ "' ~ ~ EA RLE R. ANDERSON BEVERLY E. BRAOEN VICTOR A. CHERBA K. JR.. Pr•ndnl CHARLES A. WEST February 15, 1985 ) 'i,A ,~ a 1 } ' ~',•~ ~ ~~ it rr City of Rancho Cucamonga ^^~~^~'A ,-•~. Engineering Department ~~~~I"P5,4"'. ~;~. :n~•~•••~ P. O. Hox 807 "" Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mr. John Martin Gentlemen: Plaza Builders, Inc., Developer of Tract No. 11893, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, has deposited with this District a Material • and Labor Bond, a Faithful Performance Hond, and a Utilities These bonds and agreements are being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga Covnty Water District. At this time, the waterline improvement plans have not been approved. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT /'/ /f. Ci`'~~~Li ll Be/t ty Fien Secretary b Improvement Agreement for waterline construction. G ~' CITY OF RANCHO [U CAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGF.EEMENT FOR Tract No. 11893 KNDA ALL MEN BY THESE PRESE;ITS: That this agreement is made and entered iota, in conformance with the provisions of [he Subdivision Map Act of the Stale of Calif ornta, and of the applicable Ordinances of [he City of Rancho [ucamang a, California, a municipal corporation, Ey and 6e tee en said City, hereinafter ref err eu to as the Li ty, Pinza 6wilders. Inc. hereinat ter ter erred to as ine Deve iT Oper. NITAESSEiN: THAT, WHEREAS saitl OevelDDer desires to develop certain real property in Said City as spawn on the conditionally ap prov etl subdivision known as Tract No. 11893; and N HEREAS, said City has es[ablishetl certain requirements to be met by said Oevel oDer as prerequisite to approval of safe subdtvisf on generally loc at etl at the west City limits on the south side of Banyan Street. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: i. The Developer hereby agrees to consL wet at Oeve7op er's expense all improvements described on Page fi here- of within tyre lve months from the effective date hereof. • 2. This agreement shall be effective an the date of the resolution of the Council of sold City aDProving this agreement. This agreement shah be in default on the day follow- ing the (Irst, anniversary dale of said apP royal unless an exten- sion Pf time has been granted by said Lity as hereinafter provid- es. 3. The Developer may request an ext¢nst on of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to Che City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extensipn of time. The City shall have the right tp review the provisions of thfs agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and [o require ad,7ustments therein if any substantial change pas occurred during the term herepf. 4. If the Developer Iatls ar neglects to comDlY with the provisions of this agreement, the Lily shall have the Nght at any time to cause said provisions to be net by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and/or his surety the toll cos[ and expense incurred. 5. The Developer shall provide metered water service to each' lot of Said development In ace ore once wi [h [he regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cup amonga County Haler District. 6. the Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relacatfon, or removal of anY aom pD pen: of any irN gation water system in Conflict ai M construction Of roquir¢d imprOVemen is t0 the sa[i sf ac[fan p£ the City Engineer and the owner of sueh wafer SySt¢m. 7. ImOro vements required to be constructed iha 11 -1_ <onf orm to the Standard Drawings and Standartl Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan approvetl by and on file in the Office of the City fnSineer. Said improvem ea is are tabulated on the Constru,ti on and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by nua Der, the Developer shall also he responsible far construc- tion of any transitions or other in cid¢n[al ~nork beyond the tract bpvn dories as neeJeJ for safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or ommissions discovered during construc[in shall be Corr ¢cled upon [De tlirection of the City Engineer. Aevised work due co said pl on w.,Jffl -evisfors of this agreement and secured by the surety ~c ov erinq~the original pl ar.n ea ~+orks. D. Construction permits shall b¢ obtained by the Oe ve roper from the office of the City Engineer prior [o Start of work; all re gvlat ions listed thereon mall be observed, with attention given [o Safety procedures, control of aus t, noise, or other nuisance to [he area, and [o proper notffication of public utilities and City Departments. failure to cpmplY with this section shalt be subject to [he penalties provide) therefor. 9. The Developer shall be responsible Por removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rf ghts-of-way wf thin or adj oininq said development resol [ing from work relative to said deve)opmen t. 10. work done wi Chin exf sting streets shall be diligently pursued to eompieti on; the Li ty shall have the ri Sh[ to cpmplete any and all Bork :n the event of unjuztif ied delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the• De vetoper and/or his contractor by any lawful means. 13. Said Developer shall at all times fallowing dedica- tion of the si reefs and easements in said subidi vision, up [a the completion and accept once of said work or improvement by said City Council, give goad and ad eguate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said si reef or easement, and will protect the traveling pvDl is from SU Ch dCfettly¢ Or ddpg¢r0u5 [ondl [IOn S. Dntil the completion of all Improvements, herein inc orpar ated an Page 6 to De pert orm ea, each pf sold streets not accepted as im provemen[s shall De antler the charge of said DevelaDer. Said Developer may close ail pr a portion of any street su bJer.t to the coMitions contained in a temporary street closure permit, 155ved by [he City Engineer, whenever it Is necess aiy w protect the public dur7ng the con structien pf the Improvements herein agreed to De made. 12. Pdrkway trees re Suited to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed. Planting shad De done ai pr o•+t ded by Ordinance in dccprtl once with the plans ing dfagr am aDPro ved by the City Communi :y Development Olrectar. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining a17 trees pl ant ¢d in goad health until the end of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is later. l7. The Dev?toper is responsible /or meeting ail coeds. [ions establish ed by the Li ty pursuant tU the $ubdivl5 ipn Map AcL, City Ordi antes, and this agreement for the aevel opm ent, and for [he mainien ante of all Impravem en is con strutted thereunder until Lhe improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, • _p- and np improvement security provide) hereinrvi~h shall be released before such ac<eptan<¢ un~l ess aL.er Wise prpviJed and authorized by the City Council of [he City. 14. This agreement shall nd[ terminate until fhe maintenance yuar an tee security hereinafter descri hed has been released by the City, or until a new ag reemen[ together with the required ir..p rdveme r,t se cu r. ty has been submitted to the City by a successor :o the hereto named, and py res elution ¢f the City Council same pas been accepted, antl this agreement and the ImprnVtlm¢nt SPC Uri iy ,im•c•v. .•ai b.v.. VCICaspd. 15. The impr¢vement seta rity to be furnished by the Developer With this agreement shall consist df the following and shall be in a form aces ptahl¢ by th¢ City Attorney: A. To secure faithful per Pormance of [his agre¢men [. 1. A band qr hones by one or more duly authOrit¢d corporate sureties in the farm and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and coot ent Spec stied by the City Attorney. ~. 0. depo Sit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind app rqv e0 Por securing deppsi is of public monies. B. Tq secur¢ laborers antl materiaimen: 1. A hood or bonds by doe pr more duly authorized c4rpor ate sureties in She form and consent s pees( led by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Sec u: i[y (nstr ument in the form • and coot enC spe<if ied by [he City Attorney. 3. A deposit with City at money or negotiable bo r.ds of toe kind approve0 for securing C. q cash deposit with the Lity to guarantee payment by [he Developer to The engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final 14ap £or the setting of ail boundary, tot corner, antl street centerline non omen ti and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the Ci[y. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certiffed by ens engineer or surveyor as acceptable paym ena in full; Dr, if no value i5 SYbml tt¢d, [he CdSh bond SIIa II CC d5 Sh 0'dp on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein. Sa1tl cash deposit may be refunded as soon ai prq<e- dure permits after receipt by the City of [he centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment In full from [he engineer or surveyor. 0. The required bonds and the principal am ounfs thereof are set forth on page 6 of fhfs agreement. 16. The Developer warrants that the Improvements i tlescr7bed in this agreement shall be free from defects in materials antl workmanship. any and alt portions of Lhe improve- mentk found to be defective within one (1) year fallowing the data on which Che improv a.^~en is are accep tetl by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Oevelcper free of all charges to the City. The p¢veloper shall furnish a main[en once guarantee security in a sum equal [o ten percent (10Y) of the cdnstr action e5tima CC or 5200.00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful p¢rform ante of Developer's obligations ds descrihed in This para- graph. the maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the Nithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do specified work with respect to any parkway -7- maintenance assessment di s[ri ct. Once the improvements hav_ been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the ether improvement security described in this agreement may be released provided Chat such release is otherwise author ::ed by the Subdivision MaD Act and any app7icah7e City Ordinance. l7. Thai the Oeve to Der shall take out and maintain such pubis[ liabi lily and property damage insurance as shall protect Aim and any contractor or su be Ontr ac tOr performing work covered by this agreement from claims fur w ~o=~•y •~o yea which m..y an s^ becadse Of the nature Of the wort or from roper a[ions under this agreement, whether such opera:iaps Oe by hi~self or by any contractor ar subcontractor, ar anyo r.e directly or indirectly employed by said persons, even though su.'h damages be not caused ey the negligence o/ the OevelDV er Or any contractor or su OCOntr actor or anyone employed by said persons. The public lia0il sty and property damage insurance shall list the Ci [y as addi[onal insuretl and directly pr o[ect [he City, fIS Officers, agents and employees, as well as the Oevelope r, his con [r ac tars ana his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued hereunder shall so slate. The minimum amounts Of such insurance shall be as follows: Contractor's liah ility insurance providing hodily injury Or death liabili Cy limits of not less fha 5300,000 (or each person and 51,000,000 (or each accident or occurrence, and property dama qe liabil- ity limi [s of not less than 5700,000 for each acci- dent or act urrence with an aggregate limit of f250,000 for claims which may arise from the Opera- tions of [he Oev eloper in the performance of the• work herein pro videtl. Automobile i5 abil sty insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance of this agreement prpV id ing bo Ai ly injury liability limits of not less than 5200,000 tOr each person and 5300,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits d( mat less [h an 550,000 for each accident or OC<u rren<e, with an aggregate pt not less than S10C,000 which may arise from the opera- tions of Lhe Oevelaper ar his Con trot tOr in performing the work provided for herein. 18. That before She exe cvt ion of this agreement, the Oev eloper shall /{le with the Clty a certificate ar certi(icatei of lnsu ranee cav er ing the specified insurance, Each such certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding Lhe canceliati on s, or reduction in coverage of any policy evitl¢n ces by such certificate, before the expiration Of thirty (30) days alter the City shall have received motif icatipn by registered mall from the Insurance carrt er. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained heref n, and ' of intent to comp7Y with same, the Subdivider has supmi tt ed the Pollowing described {mpro vem ent securi [y, ono has affixed his slgnatur r. hereto: • -a. FpITHF UI PERFORMANCE Type: svbd, [-pmvemen[s Principal qm ou nt: $258,000.00 Nacre and address of surety: INDEN9IP,' C0:1eANY op Cal.t: OiN L\ ]]] Nilahire, dnaheir., Ca. 32801 MATE0.LAL ANB LABOR PA YNENT T>v=~ samba, hvroromencs P. ri~pl wmnnn,. S12a.000.C0 Name add dddfesS pf Surety: INDE):N ITY COYPdNY OF Cd4 y0N:ila J7) Nil shi re, Amhcim, Ca. 3CGOI [ASH DEP 05IT NOiIU HE NTATION Type: Principal Amounp: $7,500.00 Name and address pt surety: HAINTENANLE GUARAt1TEE T yDe: principal Amount: Name and adore ss of surety: TB BE POSTER PRIOR TO ALOE PTA NLE BY TiIE CITY • ~ IN NITRE SS NE RE OF, the parties hereto have caused [h eye presents to be duly eaecu [ed and ackn opi edged with all formalities repuired by lap on the dates sec forth opposite theft signatures. Oa[e 3/G/R5 by ,0 cveloper Stynxt re G. R. Meekez, Jz. tin tea !' Date l/5/BS by _~~ ( eei _,Developer Signat Rre S. C. Marquard U tin [ed Acce ptetl: City of Rancho Cucamonga, C aiifarnia A Nunicipal Lorpor anon \ By:- Fla yar AttCS F. i[)' Llerk ` Approved: DEVELOP E0.'$ SIGNATURE MUST BE NUT ARI2E0 -$- ctrv JF Anrlct:D Lucs~;:GA _ ~ ~ ~ ~ r E.`IG IfiE ER O:G DI'%I3iG1 ~~) L ERLRJALI''.4E91 PERMII FEE SLUE OUL'c TA For ;<prcv?,a r.: Aa .D. ns93 OCT I 11984 OaL=: C:c tb=• -. 1913 s;npu too py' .:I:E file 2v~v'tnca: LI:Y Lr su ng '. f oe;rvoirveewmae t RO7Ev Oaes no[ include current fee for writing permit ar paw:ment tleposits C'A'rt:"Y DN1T 1"E `1 Pa CE A;aOU'1T __...____ L.G. P.C.L. c:rn - 1T' C.F. d° gu [t er 7.25 _-______--__ 8i C.~. -V v •.. L~° P.L c: rn cn ~ iS0 LF. bern A.C. i.30 Z-_ c F _' s+G?.+,",.(inc. '~rheel ch vir a rdroi =•:= 12.Jg2.C0 6 ^°" S,f. e a~oresrn Cr: 2.50 15.217.00 1 ;,. S. F. ? - ens; i'~::er ;, e. c:n) 3.:J 5 x'7.00 16 -^^ C.Y. S:r=xt ?x nvdn zn LSG 25.0 SO.CO c.r. i-.port ad ., oanr.-,?n: !. so by C. ~' S. F. Ire par a,;{cn ,r Sup:^::? O. li 10.3°9.30 ~ 69-,g9~ S. F. Crasnetl agg. bese (Per ;ncn :h+c <~( :") .9.[](0.12) B ]1111 TL8 A.L. (over :3~ !pns~ 2], CO iG'I A.[, (9W b !3G9 :: rsi ii.:0 _ TDfI .i. C. (SOD to 9CG tpnsl i3. CO 1 ~. p;'l I0: S. F. a. C. (uv:v:.;,,._..si 4" thick 67.79-0.73 96J,7~J0 Sy ~;~~_ S. F. R.C. (3" :n~~c;;; U.>5 10,228. EC S. F. Pat cb A.C. (trench) 1.73 ^S ,C~ S. F. 1" [h lck d. L. overlay 0.30 1 57_y40 EA. Ad, u;t sewer macnola tp gale 250. D0 -- 3A. Adlust saner e: xn nu::o yr nd? 130. G9 -- EA. AD]ust oat er valves b gr cee 73.L4 -- 22 EA. f L Rre°[ liynt; SSCO ai n) Ba rr tc ides ;intersec 1000.70 1. C0 22 C 0 _ - . . L.F. . 2 x d^ - ;=.r I, 75 9,;92 S.G. Reao'+dl of A.C. oav e-~?n! 0.33 3 d8]. 20 L.F. Ae-,ov~t pf P.C.f.. cin 3.30 1.211 L.F Rempval o£ A, L, ben IA4 1 211.00 ~ Ed. SLr c?t signs 270.70 60:.00 _ EA Re^ee tors and pos :5 ]5.00 LF. [p ncrete black wall 25.00 S. F. Ae to m ing +all 20.OJ TCR Agg regal? vase 7,00 - C.Y. La ncrete structures 425.00 v75 _ L`. 18" RCP (2000 0) 29.00 I Od4,00 199 L.F. Z7"2D" qCP (750147 7250) 38.00 35.114- 6.368.00 245 Lf. 7fi" RLP j1~G11`(77301 49. CO 12.056.00 1___.~_ L.F. 21"AE;' RCP Al::=~1I(1250) 72.00 JG,116 6.016,0v I EA. Cd[ch bas .n ^ = 3' 2000.W 7000.00 I EA. ~c1 basin N = A' 23' 4,3008'JO.110. 4.500.,^,0 j EA. Ca:~h basin N =11'28' 3,070 A300.A6 15.000.00 692 FA 3. F. Local tlepreszivn al 7.50 `-•0.1'.G1 2 4 22 40 EA. Local depression 12' 1000.00 -I- EA. dunc[ion st rvc Care 3000.70 3.000.00 EA. Outlec stray ure. 5[^~:CfC6%SBC FCC183-A 1570,00 1.30'].00 EA. Outlet structure, Std a07 300.70 I EA. Xk.~l#(ICF6:K6 Conc. Col ldr S6CfL0 167 40.00 -Sd`T.QO- L.F. Gu artl panel (aooC) 25.00 o°j L,F. Sawcuc 2.OC 1.982.00 EA. Headwall (38" aing) GOOD, 00 -~ L,F. Rvaeood header L]3 S. F. Lan dscao ing L nrinat ion 2.75 _ - l,f. 0.011 curb (P. L. C.; 7,50 _ 1 E.A. INLET APR011, Std 313, inc. 12 "P.CP 1 000.00 a TnT'L t 2a3 "4SS34-- ERGIiiE Eft II:G i' 13 P EC7ION GEE # g9R$. 2I S'J7 i076L ~ 231955.2 •RE STBRArI O;I/CCL PIEAi I09 CASN a~o e.ne CCNi ;I:G E'iLY COS iS s DE POSH (REF U:IOAOL E) --'Y FAI LIIFUL PERT OR:IA Nf.E 00110 (100X) p' e MP.IU14RI7Ai 10:1 SUA ElY ([d SB) 3 5~ ~ LA 00R .1P0 IAdTERIAL gONO (50".) Ix~C .ae •Pursuant to City of Rancho Cucamonga nnn ~c iDal Cade, Tltte I, Chapter LOB, adopH ng San Bernardino County Cade ii tl es, Chapters 1-5, a cash restoration/delineation deDOSlt shall b¢ matlr pr for to Issuance of an Eng inner ing Canst ruction Pprmlt. Revised 7/04 " _~ sufiolvulox GUARANTEE NO PERFOR MRNCE (SETTI4G OF F1 NAL MU NU MENfS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Boa 807 A ancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gent'.emen: Purscan[ [p Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Goverment Cade, the undersign etl hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final map of Tract No. 11093 are to be set and furnished by the su bdivider's engineer or surveyor pn or bef pre December I, 1905, as spec ifie0 in the Engineer's ar Surveyor's Certificate and agrees to furnish the notes thereon [o complete all engineering requirements specified in Section 6fi497, of the Gayer nment Code. The ur,d ersign e0 hands you herewith [he sum pf S 3,500.00 as a cash tle posit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuaen [s wilt be se[ and the notes furnished as above pravi ded on or Ce/ore [he date sp ecif ietl and chat the engineer or surveyor wilt be paid by the undersigned. I[ is further understood and agreed that in the event She unders i9ned fails to complete the above requiremen is within the tf me specified, the Li ty of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to complete said requirements or cause them to be cpmDlet ed and the Cost thereof is to be a charge agaf nTt said cash depoTit, and the • City of Rancho Cucamonga is au[hortzed to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the Droper city tune. It is further agreed Lhat if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final mpnuments, and if the engineer or curve y4r gives the notices prescribed in Section 66497 of the Gayer nm ent Code, the City shall pay to said engineer pr surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. If the cost of completing said requirements ea ceeds the amount pf the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference wifhVn thirty (3U) days after receiving written statement Trom the Ci[y of Rancho Cue amonga iDec ifytng the amount of the difference between the cash tle ppstt and the actual cast of said requirements. Cordially, Su hdivider Address s Date The depo si ter of retard (for return of any portion of the cash Deposit) shalt be Pto :.n rt~oiLhrs l10>-1 Air•aa^ wn. Como }lesa, CA 92526 •x amei pddr¢5T NOTE: TO BE SUOMITIEO FOLLY FILLER OUT pN0 SIGNED ao:ID 9n. 9n9iF.5 fRE?Il L':I S.'..Od5.00 FAITNF UL PEgf Oq IaANCE BONG 'dNEOEnS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Lucxmpnox, Sta t= of California, And r,,-, a. ^+c c= it rn rrd n (herefnafter designated as "pn ncipal"} have xntxred :n [o an agre_ment whereby pn nci pal agrees [o install and cpmp~¢Ce a4n nisi an ztPA cu blic im orovem ents, wh irh said apreevov [, daCed 190 and itleptifted as prof ec: tract Ao. c 09J r ne reoy ,'xferre a`[o and made _ par: hereof; an tl, NHEgEAS, said principal is repaired unC er Ltie terns of said agreement [a furnish a 6antl for Che fat Chf ul p"-rfornance of said agreemer,;, 't 0'n, iiiE 3EFCR°, w¢ th¢ principal dnd n. L.r. v CO`IPT 1Y nv \;.\L[°n 3:; [d as sorely, are held and firmly bound unto [he Crty of Ran cno Cucamcnga (.`.er einaf ter tailed "City") in the penal sum of Two Nand red Fif :y-Eight Thousand and CO/t00 Dollars (5259,000.00) loaf vl money Of the Oni tad Slates, for the pa ymenf of which sum well and trv ly to be maee, ee bind ours elves. our heirs, Svcce550r 5. [xecuCOrS dnd atlTi015trdbor 5, jOtntlf dnd SPVxf ally, firmly by these presents. Th6 condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, edminiitrat0 rs, race esscrs or assi3ns, shall in all things stand to and abiAe by, • dnd well dpd truly i(2Ep and pxrf Orm ChQ COVenan [5, Cpndltipns and provisions fn the said agreement and any alter anon thereof made as therein provided, an Ms or their part, to be kept and performed at Che time and in the manner therein specif l¢d, and in all resoec is according to their [rue {nient and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and emplo Y¢es, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall becone nu it and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full Porte and effect. As a part of the obligation recured hereby znd in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shad be inclueed costs and reasonable expenses antl Zees, including reasonable dtt of ne y's fees, incurred by Gity in successfully enforcing such obligation, ail io be taxed as <os is and inc tvded in any judgment r¢ndered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, al ter ai ton or addi [tan to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the speci- fications ace om ponying the same shall 1n anywise affect its Obligations on this bo~~d, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration pr addition to She terms of [he agreement or to the work pr to the specif ica[ion s. I;1 'dt T:1 E52 NNE9E UF, thls Instrument has been duly eeecut ed by the principal and surety above named, on canu.vr IB , 199. rla:n ae ud¢rs o-.r„r:,nr,,v vn 1Hnera~rtr cnnvagr of c,\ttfoa:uA U eve opera j Surety, ..,i .: i : x C' r --~~~ Si7na ~re) n t tarneY-in- acv' • Thomas II, ty roll, Jr. PLEASE ATTALII PONER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BOIIOS S IGOATURES NUST eE NOTARIZED • Bowo No. nonsecs p4F.Y R`I Intl, n Pa rf. Bond LRB BR ANB 4gTERIAL MEN BOtID B HEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cvc among a. St a:¢ of Califarnl a, and al ~~, dui Idea rnr .r:,n ro [ud (he r¢Inafter design aced as "pnnn pal" hive e~Te r'¢o Into an ogre cr.en; 'whereby principal agrees to install and comple [e c?r[aln .^.asiynatea public imsrov amen ts, which said agr z¢ment, dared :S3 an0 itlentifle0 as prof''-ct Tract ao. 1a3~ 9 S~ereOy rer erred W and ,'node a part hereof; and va-Dues inC =r the terms of said acreemen t, principal is reg u',rep before entering vp on the p^_rf ornance of the work, to /i!¢ t good Ind sufficient payment bond 'ai th the City Of Ran ci.o L uC 3ryan^yJ [O 52CJf¢ the CI d1l5 [J wnlth ref Cr c'n L2 f5 xE de in ii Lle IE (ccrzmencing with Section ;952) of ParC a of Oi•n lion ~ Of the Civil Cade of Che State Of C: ~ifarnid. ;1OV, THEREFORE, said principal and the unCersignea as a cor pprJ to surety, are held firmly Sound unto the Li ty of Rancho Cu. anonya and ail contractors, 5u bcontrdct or s, laborers, material men anC other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid oar¢em eat and referred to in the aforesaid Code of civil ProceEVre fn the sum of One Hundred twenty-nine Thousand and 00/100 Ooll ors ($329,00.00), far materials furnished ar labor ther¢on of any kin tl, Or far amounts due und¢r the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such x'o rk or labor, thax said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinEbove z?[ forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bona •i 11 pay fn addition [o [he face im0un[ [Hereof, casts anC fpxSJndble CXpCn525 add fp¢5, lpClhding r¢d5ondblC a[[Jrney'S fee;, incurred by Li [y in successfully ¢nf orcing such obliga[f on, t9 b¢ aw aY dCd and ftxQd by the tour[, and tp bC Ca Med a5 costs • ant to b= incl u0ed in the jud gmCnt therein rendered. I[ i5 hEYCby ¢%pr¢SSIy Stipul d[Pd and dgr¢4d :!Id[ [Ills bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all Ce rson s, compmins and torpor a:ions entitled to file claims vnC¢r title l5 (c Jamenciny ai th Sac:ion 3052) of ParC 6 Of Divlson 3 of the Civil Cade, so as to give a rf ght of action to them or ;h¢ir assigns in any suit hroaght upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become Hutt and void, p[he raise it shall be and remain in full force dnd effect. the surety hereby s[f palates and agrees that na change, extension of time, alteration Or addition to the terms of said agreement or Che specifications accom0any tag the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on tots bond, and ie does here- by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteratt on or addition. IN WI7NE SS 'aHERE OF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above nametl, on ~.nu,.: In 19d Fl nza F,[!dcrn inr~rnn n+t ed INDC!flt TY Cn••p.\%y nF C.\LI F~VYU Jn rCl (Sure[yj /'t 51 gna+f re) At:o racy-In-Fact; . _ Thomas I1. iyrell~ Jr. PLCASE ATTACII POKER Of ATT OR HEY TO ALL BOt10S SIGNATURES MUST BE NOigRIZEO r-'1•-• IiIOE.".1NITY GC LiPANY OF CALIFCRYIA ~+ ' Mora ~ J73C:dsn.r., ;C~ X10. ~~$~ J $ Anaoelm l:d'Crr, na 92501 • I"-~ 9!%9-I <it POY/ER OF ATTOPNEY u~CC ^^n HtiO:: ALe :'EV $v -~~'_ -^°CEP,Ci1 a,r xmma'C;,':.a'.:'!'.l',ilp'rau;mg..nreov rp.,2 C^dl4rr:enr^.i ..Cml TNOiWS H. TYRELL, JR. a:,., :•. ,vu :.':;--`ns-n.: ~-.. .ne vs+n .,•o:, n; s..r:^v :>^a;cr .., .a ~nas Je.ecu:e0b~ ¢.o .c ...; ,r nc..,~, -.: r ^,: PAN r n: r:.L Fr•:;.11.: •-.,rr+rv r,.... ....., gs n..,. : A.....:. a . n.: Ic::..nda^: :: ;..es,• bresenls a:e rerebv .,. „, ,,., c ... .....,, -..,; a^.,e. . A........., ~; :, .r^o it ; ; : ~~ ,.:: r , ~,..., :. •.:.n - a+sw ! aeod:ea ~+ .I;^^C^. -Vn ., 8^~ ~ ,nsiuu•. :'cf" ^CJ•,mnv- +..+c "d;? ,cr arl of `rnn nerebY is eC >Im ' r r ~. o P s c' .; t,.~ t Pd .er ~ A .cam o r +nalf o1 INDL',INITY a oc, v r..^:, ~~ :n :w.:^ D r,+r^.. cx_ r:= rocs:.,-.-.;: : s,r ,. CT: ::. _ - •.r.A bbr°•s ir,q I I c_••'ym3•; •r ;=LS¢b tY~l "'.I dnv ` •vrv ¢r a-y Ass s:am So<rem,v bC anD Inat eac^.:r ,^: m'r..7 ^"CC': ~s ao:rer~,:c'::; .+r±s r.: ^.r,.=~,; -.: ,; :-v :.: r. .. a:.er ;'.:';: r^:r .r•,•L .vtdc^. ;'erelo ;^e Bear of ;n¢ Cor-oany =~m-HC~cF;r rr,tl.r„s^.,e:~;r„•rX,,.^,c°„rn^~°^sau:::,eC'.^^dnv r,.avrea!nve7.o anv wcn Power n'A;brnev orb • n:.••r ,., . d^.v e_~r•rnn. mat. ~^ re:o Dv •acsr^~~¢ ,^e n ,cn u ^v or cr;~nca:? neanrn s..cn 'acsrmde s~cnalures wall be vded anv Dmvr~ ~. _+ , + G. mcnm! r.n<n se amrea a + x l~r:u'e :.., r`{erc: ro my e:;nd ,:nden~nrrg o' can;me: ¢I suretysmo to wmrn d is dra ad NOTIC ' ., .. ., ., In 'i. inr'¢S l'.:`nrnrl I!I'J[r.I rJITY ~..^."n.1".V n,: ~,~i^~Fl::: "il:. r~li Lrt::sfC. 'S n:n.^:dl tfdl l0 bn nClelrn'O t'n Xed dn0 Inngp brC.P.n15 10 Ce s^.^ec by ns P'^s~::ent or cY one or ns v.,:u W^s~,;¢-s ~:r^ d;;^sao nv as acrMarv nr ov one of n[ isslnant 3ecm;nnos mrs t6tn DnY or Augvv;. 19x'6 W GEUNITY COSIpANY OF CALIFCRNIq ATTEST /f~lP aii/ ~~% FaurE 'I n Jr Se re:arY X~ Jere' 3::eenev Pre- sm~~ S T.nE ..,.. ~:V,q C, tr•s •-•n D~J qr Jun?. IoEa q¢rsonally came be'ore me J¢r¢re J Sweeney Preardent and Pnul E G:dhn Jr. Secretary. to me known to De Inc ~^ ;a~i o,r] o'H„e•s of INDESINITY COM1IpANV OF CALIFOI`JIA, woo e<eculeC 19e aDOr9 insttumenl dno I'.¢'! edcn acknowrPdq¢ inp erecul cn 01 •n¢ same. ana De~nq ny mB Ouly sworn t1r, sP,veraly CCpose and sav Pat I'ley Ne Ine szip olhcers of Iae comerabon atbresald. anG mnr he sc'+I all.yd m Inc above mslrument Is M1e seal of Pe corporalrOn ana Inal smd cercorale seal dn0'nev srgna;ures as sucn olhcers were duly a" mtl and sobscnDetl m Ine Bard iNbumenl oy Ine aNnonly n' ine Doaro of drtecims of sdrJ corpnrauon pxNNppplppaYaPpTlpplpAAppapbN~ a~,n>~ =EN>. e VICKIE JOHNSON ~`F'+x3' NOTARY PNBLIL.G1lIFOftNU E ° Ba+nuE couNn MY Cammisawn EJpu¢s Hw. ZT. 1985 z illppNlullnrpllnlllpnnnnrlplpll rlllrtnpppl U~s~ ., . „ nnc `nee c,'„rson STAT'c CF (;,1LIFOn NIA COt...iv ^F C,'+.,~ciE > ('.E^'.-:rq'E ~::., i An^Is^cr `hv ni N'i:: ll 1. f\;aa~ ! r. 1 CR;! 1 f,01 '.i'/CERTIFY in it ~IOlgo na ana ~rracne0 p ~ 't ~,. 1 r5 Illl nrLP lr•1 n n )I .r r 1 I'Inrp Inyl ~rf n O.~i:and 01 na r+':GV nTia LI rflB E%f f.UIIVP. CV rnri".:u, rl ~ ~' :.. ;rtl OI 0 rr;mOmr Sr/I 1nrIM1 i~ Inq p~'.vnr n: ,1;:'.r'n! .1rC r'):Y rn rOr¢n Svlncn ornl dealedmme Gly of Santa Ana Camornm, Ims 18th Day or January ,lo y5 • ~•ICGQrRa 5M~ea~ ~ r ~ ~ , ~' r.J rn r - ~ ~ ~ ~ Bayam fl Balo~~ASSlslinl Se Idry • RESOLUTION N0.-€83-ZO-~03R A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAh10NGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, I MPROVEM,ENT SECURITY, AND FINAL !NAP OF ?RACY N0. 11893 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 11893 consisting of 36 custom lots, submitted by Plaza Builders, Inc., Subdivider, located on the south side of Banyan Street, west of Sapphire Street has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Imprrv ement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is • approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and Buff icf en t, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on hehalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. AYES: NOES: ' ABSENT: don D. Mikel s, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa ',~) CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA~10NGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 20, 1985 .~1~~ ~iQ9 ~;'~ , <~~ ,,, ~> x; 1 ~ i_ C, ~~ I!y 197. T0: City Councii and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Nubb s, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kr ail, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Tract No. 12772-i, Bands and Agreement located on the west side of Turner Avenue at Palo Alta Street submitted by Morris & Searles Tract No. 12772-1 was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on September 12, 1984, for the division of 15.2 acres into 81 lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 du/ac) located between Ramona and Turner, south of Base Line. An Agreement and Bands are heing suhmitted in the following amounts to guarantee off-site improvements: Faithful Performance. ,.... ....$81,000.00 labor & Material ..............$40,500.00 letters of approval have been received from the High Scho61 and Elementary School Districts. RECOITffNDATION ]t is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract No. 12772-1, accepting the Bonds and Agreement and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said map to record. Res pectfulty submitted, _ / 7 ~ J / ` ' f-~. ~LBN:BKyko ', Attachments A~ ~n RhV'v4A .1V ^~. _~- ~1 - _~;~, ,~~- , I ~~ ~~, ~. T ~'~ ~ i ~.~ I.I '{~.. ~ ~ 1~~iJ __ ~_ l l ~. .~:. i :f~~~_.._ i~ ~~ .1, P g ~~. ~i ii ~SQ7: „ •~ _. _.__ .. . i ._ _ .__ . __- _ _ _V ..: i .... , .': --- ~ ~ ~ ..:,; ~~`°, ; - w. TRnc7 ~o ~:„Z PHasi~l6 Pew 8/ CHAFFEY JOINT UNI~~V HIGH SCH004 DI~~RICT ° 'pNirv~fi°°~°° O 111 WEST fIFiH SiflfET, ONTAfl IO, CALIFOflNIA 91163 ros wma zcx N. ~^ , °, 0 0 0 0 ~ ~~~ w~„ ~ °~ •l„~ fi fMifx eoVCnilp N.fL 3[n Vic F S [EN ien fP Ix orvE Ill.l fsf fstl °,.~ ,w°..,fx, February 7, 1985 Letter of Certification of School District Capacity Within the Chaffey ,]pint Union High School District attendance boundaries for the fallowing described project: location/Description: Tract No. 12772-1 Rancho Cucamonga Number of Dwellings: 20 single family dwellings Anticipated Completion Date: unknown The schooi district hereby certifies that the capacity for 3 Students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, ar any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall validate such commitment. ~nten cc: Planning Division payer Engineerin City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 2950 Airway Ave. B-2 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (Dave Gilette) • C~ ~ . ~ +a : l ~fiias~~ SC~a~~ ~~57y~~o ;457 Foothill BOUlnazrrl /Rancho Cuczrnonga, g'lifoo da / (71a) 989-3541 ADMINISTRATION FranA A. Cosca, )r„ Ed. D. D~suict Supenn:enCxm john A. McClary Assistant Superntxndent. Personnel Thomas W. Garnella, Ed. D. Assistant Supcrrnten Cv'nC 9us+ne55 Services Februar:• 13. 1985 Date ~, . C°_TiC2, GF CEST.2FIC.?: !'i0:} 'rCR CC!iCOL DTS T3ICT CAPAC.T1' Within Centr-~.1 Sc`~,ecl District and Cencrl Sc;~.ool District attendance 'ocundaries for the foilo~.: i,:g desc ri Sed protect: Devel aper ,•a=:5 t SNARL°s Location/Description 1\e C.aeen Paseline y ':"'.arch ar.c between Turner s Ramcna 11'mcc 11772-1) _ _ Sutn'oer r.; D'..cll.:t£ Cnirs Eiuht~• one ssn,Lc eamily units (Bl? . fen c'. e::.en: 'Lhe Cen: rai iinc~oi Districc hereby certifies that i.[ will provide capacity for '1P" St'.Id C:as 1' :r;.?^5 $.-° :ivl:•z, it hcus :~ !tpl[5 to hB c005Ciucted in the above res niecti r.~: ^: c•eeiopr•enL This ce: tiEieae inn is given on the co:;die:oa [h c!: 1! T'u' de':^L~„~~r and d!strut haae exec aced [he "Agreement for °iaar.ci n; PuSlic Sc`.:col Fac ii ties and csta`.:Lishinc Fe^_s for Sech Facilities" and ?) The developer con[;. r.acs t.o conpl;: s:iCh the L_...., and condi [ions of the :1£reenen[. The cor.,aicm^nt cf [his letter s:-,ait. e>:pire r..e hundred and eights (150j days from th^_ 1.,.:: n: t'n;~ ': ..,... .. ..: 12:41 c,.. __ 19e5 This iecter of Certification for School Discr ict Capacity s'noll he aonassigneble and all 2ssign~ents are r.vll and void. ,lppr,^. v._.} of -F.e ..... _, 1•,,~..+.inr n•ci ~, ',r ~.,e Ci[r aL °r.nc`.:n Ccc eror,:^.:.i th is the 1SJ day per nr'. ~s1.a11 .o1:5c cc `.uch co,^.u .,-~enC, to [h!s developer. Si ncerely. '~ -s i ~ ~' Frank A. Cc=_c::, Jr. Snperinter..':ent 3/54 ~, ~ pOAHU Ol T0.USTEEg Urrnnae \Y. Dutton Pamela L Wrighl pi<Nrtl C.ileundcr IaaY ..NaAebey path A.Mmter ntrmoer hef:dart Ct••E ar.,nnrr v.,nner ~~ . el<r.r...dr.e ROBERT NEU EELD ~~'r So-.rm.v. Gv.ai Alev,kr GUCAMONGA GOUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOTO W. MICHA~ o,.r ~" ~ ~ ~ EA FLE R. ANDERSOry BEVERLY E, BRADEN VICTOR A. CHERBA K. JR.. I'.raarne CHARLES A. WEST ' ~' March 5, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga Erg ineering Department P. O. Box B07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Availability of Water and Sewer Service for Tract No. 12772-1 Gentlemen: The above mentioned property can receive water service from this District, subject to pipeline extension policies, rules, regula- tions and rate ordinances of this District. Adequate waterline and water storage capacity exists and will exist to serve the above referenced property at the time of occupancy. The sewer system capacity and the sewer treatment plant capacity will be sufficient to serve the above mentioned property at the time of occupancy. Yours truly, `Cn/UCAM`On/NGA COcWi nTY WATER DISTRICT L~ ~ r ~:.~ Russel C. Silva Engineering Aide III RCS:bf cc: Boyer Engineering • C ~` r CITY OF RA N[HO CDCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREE MEXT FOR TRACT N0. I2I72%I KNON ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: Thai this agreement 1s made and entered into, 1n conformance with the Dra vision s' of the Subdivision Map Rct of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, C al if arnia, a munfcipal torpor atf on, by and Ae[ween said C1 ty, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Morris Searis hereinafter referred to as the DevelvDer. NITNESSE TH: T NAT, NHE 0.ERS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown an the conditionally ap Droved subdivision known as Trac[ No. 12772; and N NEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met oy said Devel aper as prerequisite to approval o/ said subdivision generally located at Palo Alta Stree, Turner Av enae and Teak Nay. NON, TNEREFDRE, it is hereby agreed by sold City and by Bald Developer a follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to con strut[ at Developer's expense all improvements described on Page 6 here- of within twelve months from the effective date hereof. • 2. TAIs agreement shall be effective on the date v! tAe resoiutf on of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day tollow- 1ng :he first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as heref na/t er provid- ed. 3. The Developer may re vacs[ an eaten siDn of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to the City to wr7 ling not less than 30 days before the expiration date Aereo t, and shall contain a fiat em ent of circumstances necessitating the extension of time, The City shall Aave the rI9At tv review the provisions of this agreement, Including the can stru<tf on standards, cost estimate, +nd Improvement security, and to require ad~ustm en is therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 1. I1 the Developer fails or negieccs to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shah have the right at any time to cause said pravtslons to b< met by any law/uI means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and/ar his sur aty the full cos[ and expense Incurred. S. the Dey¢laper shall pr ovtd¢ metered water service to eacA lo[ v( sold developm en[ in accordance wi to the regulations, schedules, and fees o1 the Cucamonga County Xater Oistri<t. fi. The Develcper shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal o/ any component of any irrigation water system in canlli ct with construction of revuired im pravemen is to the sans/action of the City Engineer antl the owner of such water system. -1- REGEIYED FEB 281?~S r,e.xwm ~a~vrtn ~_ n _~ f~_ 7. Improvements required to De constructed shall cpniorm to the Stand ara Drawings antl Standard Specif icatf ons Of the City, and to the Improvement Plan apps ved by and an file in the office pt the City Engineer. Said improvements are tabulated an the Construction and Vond Estimate, hereby incur p0 s led on page 6 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number. The Developer shall a150 be responsible for construc- tion of any [ranii[i ons Or other incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed fOr sa/ety and proper SU rf ace drainage. Errors or ommissions discovered during con s[Y UC tin shall De corr ecCed upon the direction of the Lity Engineer. Revised work due [o said plan modifications shall be co re red by the provisions of thfs agreement and securee by the surety covering the original planned works. 8. Construction permits shall be ob tatnetl by the Develop ar from the of lice of the City Eng in¢er art or to star[ Of wprk; all regulations listed thereon shall De observed, with attention given to sa/ety procedures, control of dust. noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to prober nOtf iicati0n of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section shall be su Oj ec[ to the penalties prpv idea the refar. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for romp val a( all loose racks and other debris from puDl is rights-Of-way within or ad3 Dining said development resulting from work rela Live [o said development. I0. Work done within ea lst ing streets shall De tllligently pursued to completion; [he Clty shall have [h¢ right to complete any and a1i wprk in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to re cpver all cost and expense incurred from eh<• Oevelpper anO/or his contractor by eny law/ul means. 11, Sald Oe veloper shall at all times following dedica- Lton of the streets and easements In said su Didivl Sian, up to Me <om D1e[ion and acceptance of said work or improvement by sa5tl City Cpuncit, give good and adequate warning to the traveling pu Oli< of each and every dangers us contliti on eel scent in said street or easement, and will protect the travelfnq public from Such def ¢c[1V¢ Or dangerO JS [anal[i0O5. Unt it the oompl etian of all improvements, herein incor por ste0 on Page 6 to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as improvements shall De under the charge of said Developer. Sold Oev eloper may close all ar a Dortton of any street sub3 ect to the tonal lions coot al netl in a temvorary street closure permit, issded by the City Engineer, whenever it Ss necessary to protect the public during the construction o/ the improvements herein agreetl to De made. 12. Parkway trees requires LO De planted Shall D¢ planted Dy the Developer after other {m prov ement walk, gr atlinq and cleanpp has been completed. Planting shall De done as provided by Ordinance 1n accordance with the planting dtagr am approved by the Lity [ommuni ty Devetopmen[ Dire ttor. The Developer sh ail De responsi Dle for maim of ning ail trees planted In gobtl health until the end o1 the guaranteed maintenance perf od, or lOr one year after planting, whichever 15 later. Ig, The Developer is responsible far meetfng all condi- tions established by the City pursuant tp the Subdl vision Mdp A<[, City Ortliances, and this agreement far the de velppment, and for the malnten ante of all improvements cons tract ld thereunder -2- ~r-Z ~ . until the improvement is ac ceptetl for maintenance by the City, and no improvement security provided hereinwith shall be r¢leasetl before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized py [he Lity Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security herein of ter described has been releasetl by the City, or until anew agreement together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the Li ty by a successor to the Aerefn named, and by resolction of the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security therefor has been released. 15. The improvement secvri [y to be furnished by [he Oeveioper ri th this agreement shall consist of the fol lasing and shall De in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. is secure faithful performance o/ this agreement. 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized cof ppf ate sureties in [he form and con tent spec if lea by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. qn Improvement 6ecuri ty Instrument in the Porm and content specified by [he City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City pf money pr negotiable bonds o1 the kind approved for securing deposits ¢i public monies. B. To secure laborers and maters almen: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorize0 [prp ordfB iJre[i<S 1p th! fpfm dpd Content specified Dy Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the farm • and content specified by the City gttorney. 3. A depozit wf th City at money or ne9oClable bonds o/ the kind approved for securing [. A cash deposit with the Cit to guarantee payment by the Oevel oper to the engineer or surveyor whose certif seats appears upon the Final Map for the setting of all boundary, lot rorner, and street centerline monum¢nts and far fm•nishi ng centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be anY amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or. 1f no value is su bmi[t etl, the cash bond shall De as mown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein. Sold cash deposit may De re PondeO as soon as proce- dure permits after rec el pe by tha Clty of the centerline tie notes and written assurance 0i payment 1n full from the engineer ar surveyor. D. The requires bands and the principal amounts thereol are set forth do page 6 of this agreement. I6. The 0<veiaper warrants that the improvements described fn this ayrecs~e nt shall be free from dePoCts in materials and workmanship. Any and all portions of the Improve• menu found to De defective within one (IJ year following the data On which the improvements are accepted Oy the City shall be repaired or replaced by Oeveldper free of all charges to the City. The Oevoloper shall lurnl sh a maintenance gu aran Lae secvri ty In a sum equal td ten percent (!0%) of the cdnStructlon estimate or fY00.00, whichever 15 greater, td secure the faf thful Derf orm an ce o/ Oevelmper's obi igatfons as eescriDed in [h Is par a- graph. The maim enanee guar antes secvri ty shall also secure the faithful performance Dy the Developer a1 any obligation of the -g• Developer to do specified wa rk with respect to any parkway maintenance assessment district. Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been a<c epted py the City, the pth er improvement security described in [Ms agreement may be releases pro video that suct. release /5 otherwise a uthprixetl Dy th¢ subdivision Map Act and any appl icaDle City Ordinance. 17. That the Developer shall take put and maintain such pu DII< liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered Dy~ Lois agreement /ram claims for pro Derty damages which may arise because of the na CUre of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself ar Dy any cant reef or ar subcontractor, or an ypne directly Dr indirectly employed by said persp ns, even though such damages De not caused Oy the negligence of the Oeveldper or any contractor or subcon trot [or or anyone employed by said persons. The Duhlic liability and property damage insurance shall list the Cify as additonal inspr ad and directly protect the City, its of (ice rs, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, hfs contractors and his subcontractors, and ail fnsuran ce policies iss ue0 hereunder shall so state. the minimum amaun is of such insurance shall De ai follows: Contractor's Liability insurance Drovi ding bodily injury or death liability limits of not less tha 5300,000 for each person and 51,000,000 far each accident or occurrence, and property damage liabil- ity limits of opt less than 3100,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggregate ISmit o/ 1250,000 for claims which may arise from the opera- tions pf the Oeve lop er 1n the performance of the work herein provfdetl. A uSOmobile Itabi lity insurance cOVering all vehicles used i^ the performance of LASS agreement proof ding Dodily injury 1taDi7 sty Iimi is of no[ less to an 5200,000 for each person and 1300,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage llab silty iiml is of not less Man 550,000 for each accident or occurr^^ce, with an aggregate of not less than 5100,000 which may arise from the opera- tions of the Oe vetoper or his Contractor In perf arming the work provided for herein. 18. That before the ekecutlmn of Lois agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certif i<ate Or <e rt if lcat es Of Insurance cdv erlny the specs/Led insurance. Each such carts (state shall bear an endorsement precluding the cancellations, or reduction 1n coverage o/ any policy evidences Dy such certif lcat ¢, De/ore the ea piratl on of thirty (30) days after the City shall have received 'notification by regi st er ea nail from the insurance carrier, ps evidence Oi understanding the provisions containetl hereto, and of fntent t0 Comply with Same, the 5ubdi of der has submitted the following described improvement security, and has afflaed his signature here t0: -4- • :~ FAITIIF UL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: IO1,000.00 Name and address of surety: MATE 0.IAL AND LABOR PAYMENT TYPe: Principal Amount: x0,500. 00 Name and seeress of surety: CASN OE POSIT MONUMENTAT ION TY Pe: Princl pal Amount: 55,250.00 Home and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE TYPe: Principal Amount: name one address pf surety: TO BE POS TEO PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY • n... [N NIiNESS aNEREOF, the parties here to have caused these anz. fo ee , ~ ~ .. .. s>n [Niv Che 6th day of ka^ch cn 85 1 gate of Cal ifo rnia ) b fore m [he untlenignad Noury Public, pea all ) ss: •pv.cea y coup cy of Orange I Frank D. Morris and P.obe rt B. Searles known to me co be [he pervon (s) whose name(s) are aabvczib ed m [he vfthtn Snrtr ucvm and acknowledged chat [hey zed Ne a•me for [NC pucpeaea .i,_ia-~~ [~~ ehere to con catneace ~fify Nip}~ IN NITNE55 HHEREOF, I hetan[o •et wry hsnd and l ~~~~,~ p - oEEtcial Beal. C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corppratlon BY: ,, Hayor Attest: Gi ty C e~ Approved: DEVELOPER'S SI ONAIURE MUST BE NOTARIZED r -5- LITY OF MNC110 CUCAMOHGA ENGISEE RIBG DIVISION ENCI1bnCIL2m PER.Y IT FEE SGIEOtCE For ImprovarenY Palo ~tlto Str ee rc er Avm ue and teak Na Oat e: December I9 1950 Computed by; UA File Rei erenc e: Tract '; o. i 2-I Lity Ur awing Np. 90. 6 l 6 revtsetl NOTE: Dacs not include current fee for writing permit or pavmient deposits _ DUA:IT ITY UNIT ITEM PRICE A^NOVYT L.F. P.C.C. curb - 12" C.F. 24" gutter 7.25 °19 L.F. p.L.C. turn - 9" 0.F. 2e" gutter 6.00 5,533.66 L.F. P.C.C. curb only 5.50 L.F. A.C. berm 4.50 3 l29 S.F S F 4" P.C.C. sidewalk D h i 1.]5 5 2 .00 -1 5 T 0 1_,091 . . S.F. ve appro a< r b" P.L.L. cross gutter (inc. turn) 2. 0 3.40 9 8 0 i 30736-dd 4.650 C.Y. Street excavation I.50 6 91 0 [. Y. Importea embankment 1.50 $.F. Preparation of su6graA¢ 0,15 S.F. Crushes agg. base (per inch [nick) 0.03 x 4 _ 3.226.Ob TON A.C. (over 1300 tons) 27.00 TON A.[. (900 to 1300 tans) 35.00 TON R.C. (500 to 900 tons) 45.00 TON A.Q (under i00 tans) 60.00 _ ,'F6-3i9~ ~ S.F. A.C. (l" thick) 0.55 ZT, 793 S.F. Patch A.[. (trench) 1.75 X00 S.F. 1" thick A.C. Overlay 0.30 ~4. ~0 EA. Adj vst sewer man bole to grade 250,00 EA. Adjust sewer clean out to grade 150.00 EA. Adjust water valves to 9ratle 75.00 _~ EA. Street tights 1000.00 L.F. barricades (in Cer sec. 5500 min) 1.00 L.F. 2 % 4" rPdM00d h2ad ¢f 1.75 4~ S.F. Removal df A.C. pavement 0.35 -T31-6b~ L.F. gemoval of P.L.C. curb 3.3C - L.F. Remov at o/ A.C. berm 1.00 ~ - EA. Street sf gns 200.C0 `105-66 ~ - EA. Ref lecf ors ana posts 35.00 27566 e L.F. Concrete blpik wall 15.00 5,3 , $.f. R¢t ai ping wall 20.00 TON Aggregate nose ].CO [, Y, Concrete structures 425.00 L.F. lb" q[P (2000 D) 29.00 __ L.f. 24" RCP (L500 D) 35.00 L.F. l6" RCP (2000 D) 49.00 L.f. 4fi" RCP (1200 0) 76.00 EA. Catch basin N " 4' 2000.00 EA. Catch basin N = B' 2900.00 __ EA. Catch basin N " 22' 4500.00 EA. Local depression 4' 500.00 EA. L4ca1 depress Tan 12' 1000.00 - - EA. dun coon structure 5000,00 1 EA. Outlet strut to re, Std MSOfi 1500.00 -T.$Q566 EA. Outlet strut [u re, Sta 0507 500.00 EA. Guard posts 40.00 L.F. Guard panel (wood] 25.00 ' L.F. Sawcu[ 2.00 _ - EA. Headwall (4 D" wing) 4000.00 ]91 L.F. ReAwood heaA er 1.75 EA Street trees 60.0 0 - L.F. 0.011 turn (P.L.C.) 7,50 . 0G6 L.F. Chain Link Fen re 2.50 -I-I56,Q6 ENGINECR IIIG INSPECTION FEE E3.7]D. CO SUB TOTAL 570, 'AESTOghTI ON /UEL RIEATION CASH CONi INIGENLY COSTS 0 DEPOSIT (AEFU'IOAOLE) fAIiMF UL PEAFOAMANLE BOND (1005) ~,~,~~ MONUME NTAif ON SURETY (CASH) 55,250.00 LABOR ANO MAIEAIAL BONG (50%) 3•u.>U0.00 •POrsuant to City of Rancho Cocaloanga Menfcipal Code, Title I, CNpter 1.OB, adopting San Bernardino County Code T~.1 es, Chapters l-5, a cash reatorat ian~dellneatlon tleposlt iMll Ee aside Dr 1 or to Issuance of an Engineering Lonst ruction PerwiL PRF:It'~'!: ,^0 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE 80N0 NHE3EAS, the Lity CDUn cif of the rity of RanchD Cucamonga, Stat¢ of Ldl if orni a, dnE 'fONP;S .4 SEaFLES (her¢inaf ter design atetl as "pnnn pa i" have entere^ Intl an agreement whereby prinN pal agrees [o in st a'.1 and compte!e certain deli 9natetl public improvements, which said agreement, dated I, Ia~~.: ~ 19R and identified as project tract '.;o. .'L ,s h¢reby re(err=-(D Jnd mad^ a part hereof; and, MNE RE nS, said principal is repaired under the terms Dt SaiE a greem ent to furnish a pond fat the faithful Ver'forq once of said agreement, N0;1, ihE7EFOP.E, we the principal dnd IYSCR ^.Sf~ ('OHF aSI' OF I:OB;p.:NEni Ca as surety, are held and firmly bound unto ch¢ City pr an chD C ucamDnpa (her eina£ter tailed "City"J, in the Pena' sum Df Eighty-One Thousand and CO/100 Dollars (EH1,000.J0~ lawful money of the 0nit¢tl States, far the payment of which sun welt and truly to be made. we bind ourselves, Dur heirs, successors, executors and adminis[r dtor s, ~plpLly and sev er dll y, firmly by these presents. The con df ti¢n of this obligation is such tM1 at if [hD above _~_ baun0 ed pr intipai, his Or its helri, exe a:[ors, atm;-istr ators, successors or asst 9n 5, Sha11 in all things st antl to anE dh ide by, and we'.1 and truly keen and perform the covenants, pondi Lions antl • provisions in the said agreement and any al ter atipn [hereof Wade as therein provided, oh his Jr their Dar[, to be keD[ and performed at the time antl fn the manner therein spec if led, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and Shall indemnify and sage harmless Lity, its of titers, a3entS and employees, a3 the"ein stipulated, then this abifgation shall become null and void; ptherwisu, it shall he and remain In full fotte and eff ec[. As a Dart of [he D6ligation secured hereby and in addf [ion [o the face amount sDecif led therefor, :here shall be foci utled costs and re aspnab le expenses and tees, including re asonablo attorney's fees, incurred by City 1n su~cessl~lly enf arcing such obligation, all [o be taxed as costs and inclutled in any judgment render etl, 1 The surety horeby stipulates antl agrees chat no change, I ext enSion of time, alter dtf on Dr addition to [he terms of the agreement or to th¢ work to be performed thereunder Dr Lhe ipeci- ficatfons accompanying the same shalt in anywise affect its abligatipns on this hood, and it doe s'hereby waive no[ic¢ of any such ch doge, extension of time, alter xtion or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the cork or to the specifications. - ~ IH GRNESS HHE RE Of, this instrument has been dv ly exerrt ed by the Dr incipal and sure [y above nametl, an `la rrh h. 199_ 11{ir F'~ °'~F Ali r~ ^.el"n R;(. is ~''9F t'il r nP.i i'IF Sle1 ' l0ov¢lova; I --~urc~yl~- _ T't ': , ~: ~, ~u~~5~g1• na!ure ~ Attorney-In-Fact 9MY+~ I,FLR'.11 .1. 1;1 `,ORIE ~E ASE niTAClI POWER OF AiT ORNEY TO ALL 80N05 SIGNATURES MUST of NOTARIZED naND .vo. i;D i; :7 77 1 PR LII U' Inr lud rtl LA000. AMO MATERIAL NEN BONG NNER EAS, the City Ce cncil of the City of Rancho Luc am onga, State of California, and (hp re i'nf'er tlesignatptl °naorc ~ cc ,i F~_ -- d rp Mhe rep / ;ave en[ereo lr. to xn CCrLlln dCSI nd:y prlnClpol dDf eps CO ~OSL311 and COm pIC[p dated ,,, 9 ed public improvements, which saitl agreement, as prc~eCt ~; ra ct lip. t2 i2+lis her~E 1985--• and identified hereof; and - Y referred .a and made a part 'a!!EgEAS, under [he terms of Said agreement, principal is reNUirpd before entering upon the pe rf orm ante of [he work, to file a goad antl sufficient payment band with [,be Li [y of Rancho CuCdTOnga [0 SeCUr? tllp Cl dims t0 MhiCh rCfprCnLC i5 mdtlC In Title :5 (tom r..e acing with Section 3092) of part : of Oi vi stun 3 of the Livii Lodp of the State of California. NO'., TNEAE FORE, said aria ci pal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are hel^. °irmly bountl unto the lily of Rancho Cucamonga and all con trot [o rs, wbcon Cr ac [ors, laborers, material m'n antl other persons employed in the performance of the a.oresaid agreement antl ref erred to fn the aforesaid Cope ti Civil Procedure in the sum of forty Thousand Five Mund red and 00/lOC Dollars (540,500.00), for materials furnished or labor tnereon 0/ any kind, or Tor amounts due under the Unemployment I surance Act with respect to such work pr labor, that sai0 - ~ sur_ty dill pay the same in an amount not exceetlin9 [he amount hpYCin aE OVE SCL fOf th, dOd d150 In CdSp SU1t 15 brOUgh[ upon [h15 bond will pay in addition [o the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable act prney's toe be law artled and Lfiy in succe ssf ullY pan nor [ion bo uch obligation, • and [o be inclotled inxthe by the court, taxed as casts judgment therein rend arid. shall lino r=erebY exDrn5s7Y stipulated and agreed that [his band [o [he benefit of any and all persons, <ompan fez and corporations entitled to file claims under title t5 with Section 7D82) p/ Par[ q of Divisan 3 of the Civil oL Ode ~isa brcughtiuppn th95tbond acti on to them or their assigns in any suit Should the condition of this band be fully performed, then this paliga;ion shay become nv'7 antl void, oche raise it shall be antl remain in toll farce and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees [hat no than gp, ex ten5i on of time, alter d[ion or atldi lion fo the terms df said a greem¢nt or the specifications accOmpanyi ng the same sh all in any manner affect its obligations on this Eond, and i[ apes here- by wal io ^e notice df any such change, extension, alteration or addit IN HIi:~ESS 'dN EREOF, this instrin¢nt has been duly executed by the pri r.cipai and surety above nametl, on N,\RCii fi, 190' ... p I ! -------, f (Jevplo per) Surat np •IOR iII 1t:EHIfA x a~ --- - r %q 'i (fir slurp) Act c~ne~_ y t ~"^L ~j / n-r act) Lr!.A':D 1. nrg~nR U: PLEASE AiiA[II POMCR nr AiT02N F.Y TO ALL BONDS SIGN AI URES MUST 6E NOTARIZED • sue Glvlslon GOAAA XTEE NO PEpFOpNA MCE (SETTING OF FINAL NOMO MENTS) Llty Council C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Bas B07 A ancnq Cucamonga, Cal if ornla 9I7J0 • Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter a, Art lc le 9, Sect? on 66497 of the Government [ode, the anden lgn eel hereoy agrees that all mgnum en is shown an Lhe f1na7 map of Tract No. 1277 i~~are to be set and furnished by the subof elder's engineer or surveyor on or before , as speclf led In the Engineer s or ur veymr s ert care an agrees to furnish the notes thereon to complete alt engineering requirements sp<cflleo 1n Section 66497, o/ the Government Code. The undersigned Mnds you herewith the Sum of 62,200.00 as a cash deposit, Said deposit to guarantee that the monuments will be set and the notes furnished as above provided on or oef ore Lhe tlate spec if Ted and that the engineer or surveyor will be pall by the and er it gned, tt is further understood and agreed that In the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the time sped/red, the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga is author tzed to compl ere Bald requirements pr cause them to be completed and the cost th<r eo/ is to be a charge against said cash depast t, and the . City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the creel It for Lh< proper city fund. IL is /u•ther agreed that ff the undersign eel Does not Dresent evidence to the Ciiy Council that ne has paid the engineer or surveyor ter the set[Ing of the final monuments, and if the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed 1n Sect ton 66497 0/ [he Government Lode, the C1ty shell pay to Salo engineer or surveyor, ene cash deposit herein made. Ii the cost of cpmpl<ttng Bald repo lrem cots emceedi the amount o/ the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference mlthln thirty (JO) days after receiving wr/ttan statement from the Cit+ of Aan cho Cucam onga spec Hying the amount o1 rho dlf /even ce between the ush deposit and the actual cost of Bald repulrementf. C Or dl ally, NOARIS b SEARIBS ~ Su6tlivlder 2950 Air v A ~ t AAdress [ =t~ f 1'f Dtte ware r. ,~s. The depositer o/ record (for return of any portion of the ca sA de pgslt) shall be r +ns~ _ Naine Atldresi Ca 92E2fi ' ROTE: TO GE SUONITTEO FOLIy FILLEO OUT AND SIGNED ~ .. RESOLUTION N0. E03-2~0~-06R• '' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 12772-1 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12712-1, consisting of 20 lots, submitted by tdorris-Searles, Subdivider, located on the west side of Turner Avenue at Pala Alta Street has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6y said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Suhdivision i4ap Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 2d of said City; and 'AH EREAS, to meet Lhe requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits far approval said final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOtJ, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED 6y the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to ex_cute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is • authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good avid sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and Lne Ci Ly Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon O. Mikel s, Ala yor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa CITY OF RAtiCIIO CtiCA.lIONG?. STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FRO'1: Lloyd B. Hu665, City Engineer BY: Barham Kr all, Engineer Technician h``,dL G1 l(Q lC9 ~•.; % n Lp'/ ct ~ .~~ ~' >~ Iz ~ 2 - Ij _ l4'% SUBJECT: Approva] of Tract No. 12801-1, Bonds and Agreement located nn the south side of flanyan Street, east of rarnolian Street submitted by The Deer Creek Company CJ Tract No. 12801 was aporoved by Planning Commission nn October Z4, 1984, for the division of 32,3 acres into 96 lots in the Law Residential (?-4 dulacl District located at the southeast corner of Banyan and Carnelian Streets. Tract No. 12801-1 is the first phase of this tract. The developer, the Deer Creek Company, has submitted Bonds and an Agreement to guarantee the construction of off-site improvements in the fnl lowf nq amounts: Faithful Performance Bond ..............5180,646.00 Labor & Material Band ..................5 90,323.00 Letters of approval have been received from Ch affey Union High Schoat District and Alta Loma School District. RECOIRAENDATION It (s recommended that City Council adapt the attached resolution apprnvinq Tract No. 12801-1, accepting the Bonds and Agreement and authorizing the said map to retard. Respectfully s mift~t/e/d~,J ~R:ko Attachments , .. ,.. t tLVBJ /_ _ ~TBIJ r i I ~ ~ , i ' ~ ~ ~T]tR JILi19T~ r ~ _ jai a ~ _ T _ ~ _ ~.~ i' .m ~~_ . ~I - _. - ,r -- .. .... . 1.~~ ~ ' _._-__ .aa i ncu .. ..-. ._. .. .. _ __.-°___ __ _ ~ . ~~ r __.. _~ f -. ~ ' ..__ _ ~_ :.. IC :_._ ( ~ 'i - 1 I ~-. .. - • r _ .... ___ Yveax9a ~~_ • __ ~_ _ _ __ _~ _ __ ~ UiRI 6-__ •~ ~ . 11 •' I :~1 (~ r I uObdnr I 1 1 I JI I ~~ -V _ ~ ... -~ I I l ~a___- ' _ i f ~ + J "` ( 1 li; ~~J~; ~ ij ~ 1 1 i. 1~ ~ , I ; r a l~ ~ it ~ ~ ~ 1 . 1 ~ -_l_i P ), y i ..~''~_~ ~ 'C I t T I __ r ` I t t ii Ii r I ~ 6 ~ o ' ~1 ~ _ _ I ~: • . 1 - •. • .~~ • IH' ~fr JI ~ - n ~ ~' f _ A li tvn~nr i • _ aLTn ~i~ r~ .~ I:: ~ i 9 i i ~ Eo~~ - 1 ~ -lit ~ 1. '~ ry 1 ~ ~ i ~ i . ~ ....~ n ~ ... _ ==~ _ . a` `1-. .. i r . . S ti' ~ 7r ~ ' _.. i 1~~ i i ri y i!.. ( ~~ r ~ _. _ ~! ~ ~ ~ r ' ..'.` 6 i ~ a1 ~`Ii ~ ~ I ~ _a ~ 1 r _ h~ _ ,i ~' ` by :~: ~ ~ n, a ~ ~ ~ ' li°~~ 7 F ' ~ ~ ~hcc ~ na ells i I ~ .. ~ I ' I Per a$, CHAF~FEYMJ~OfNT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT °. °°.,H°~°°°°° February 22, 1985 O „L EEN t11 IVE 61 FIFiH $TflEEi OY i.1 q 10, Ci IIF pF\14 91162 + ., .. En s s ivisH .. :-t.° a. CES < Ni Ex -v-~ -.o. -[es eM °~[ . E°°11°°s Ln uSi FFS .::.: ;i'.' ..-a.: n ... . ..:i an:5,6 E'~• 3.tr .: 4.9u'i`. . ...: .: , • .. a.-~ ... .'i .+s... .. ..5 r., •_,r Letter of Certification of School District Ca oacity Within the Chaffey Joint Union Nigh School District attendance boundaries for the following described project: LocationiDescription: tract "!o. 12801 Banyan & Carnelian Rancho Cucamonga, CA Number of Dwellings: 33 single family dwellings (oho se I) Anticipated Completion Date: December 1985 . The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 5 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion~he above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Alleca tion Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without ;riority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval cf the final map or the issua oce of boildinq oermits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall~vaiidate such cor~mitmen t. t~-~.~/.-lr _ SnF'rint~nderrt~Asst-; Srapervinten.svrt Dianne Atlen, Adm. Assistant cc: Plann my Division City of Rancho Cucamonga REr,EIVED fE8 2613°5 ~~ Rlta Loma School District Es;dblis hed IUR$ BOAND OF TR USTF ES ROII F.RT 5, FROS7 HOUENI N' TA NGEAfAN AIH S. L12 CALLA MINI MNS. S1NUM A. OERLT JOI LN C. UGOK ,. 9150~F Oaseline Road Pwt 0[Ilce Bat 170 AIG Lomy Callfornla 91701 • 71q/907.0766 'rh; Uir~' 6_1935 Date' JONN E McMVRTRY SupMnsrndmt ROTD M. STORK rnsrnneUSUpp•rt SeMCn SFACT NELSON Sualnna S,MCn MILLY STMIN Cunitu(uMSyrrb! M•Irru LETTER OF CERTIFICATION FOR SCIIOOL DISTRICT CAPACTTY For Residential Construction within the Alta Loma School District. DEVELOPER De.-r Creck Company TRACT NUMBER 1?SOI-t LOCTTION_South Side of Banyan, Las! of Carnelian Lo[s 1-33 NUMBER OP DWELLING UNITS 33 Single Fault ly ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE nrrrmher loRc Gentlc:nen: 7'he Alta Loma School District hereby certifies that the capacity for 19,R students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy P. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any suc- cessor Act, in such manner that the State Allocations Doard may fund all school but lrling projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90 day period shall validate such commitment. Very truly yours, -~`~ ~ n,<.ed.~-. ~.-o~.,- Stacy Yi, Nelsnn t,dlni nlstra [or of Business Servitcs jh cc: Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga a :' ~^_^ __ Vvnl'.nrdmt ~_~ ROBERT NEUFELD CUCAMONGA COUNTX WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MIC HA~ v.. •r ' ~ ~" ~ "" ~ ~ EA R`LE R ANDERSON BEVERLY E. eRADEN VICTOR A. CHERBA K. JR., /''rndmt CHgRLES A, WEST . a d . a.a/ March 12, 19H5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mrs. Barbara Krall Gentlemen: The Deer Creek Company, Developer of Tract No. 12801-1, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, has deposited with this District a Material an3 Labor Bond, a Faithful Performance Bond, and a Utilities • Improvement Agreement for waterline and sewerline construction for said tract. These bonds and agreements are t~inq accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. '1'ne sewer and water improvement plans have not been approved at this time. Yours truly, CUCAMO/NG~A COULITY WATER DISTRICT ~' ~7~:ty~~/~,CPil9 Betty ° en Secretary b ~~ CITY 06 RANCHO CUCAMO NGA IMPROVEMENT AGR ECMENi FOR TRA Li N0. I290I-1 K IIpN ALL MEH NY THESE P4ESEN TS: That this agreement ss made and entered into, in coot orm ante with the prcv idiopT of [M1e Subdivision Map Ac[ of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances Uf Che Ci tv of Rancho Cuc among a, California, a municipal corporal ion, by antl between said r.ity, hereinafter ref err¢d to as the City, and The peer Creek f.pmoanv hereinafter referred to as the Developer, NIiNES9E TH: iNAT, uNEft EAS, saitl Oevelpoe: desires to deveVOO certain real propeYty in saitl City as shown an the conAitionallY aoDrpved subdivision known as Tract Ng. 12901.1; anA uNEREAS, sa iE City has establisheA certain re quiremrnts to be met by said Developer as or erequisi to to apor oval of SaiA subd ivisipn generally located at the southeast corner of 0anyan and Carnelian Avenue. NOB, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Oeve loDer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Oove toper's eepense all improvements OeSCribeA on Gage 6 here- of within twelve months from the of f¢ct ive date hereof. • 2. This aqr Bement shall be effective on the Aa to o/ the r ezo lU[inn p/ [hp Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shalt be In default on the Aav follgw- fng the first anniversary date of saitl approval unless an ezten- sign of time has been gran [ed by said City as hereinafter provid- eA. 3. The Developer may re qu es[ an eztenslon gf time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall b¢ submitted to the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of clrc Ums[ance5 necessitating the eNt¢n5ion of time, the City shall have the right to review the provisions 0/ this ogre ement, Including the construction standards, cost estimate, and Improvement security, and tg require adJustments therein if any substantial ch ange has occurred during the term hereof, 4, I1 the Developer faits or neglet is to comD1Y with the provis Ions of this agreement, the City shalt have the right at any time to cause Said provisions to be met by anv lawful means, and thereupon r¢cpver from the Dev¢Ipper dnd/qr his Su retY the full cost d.i0 e.p Bose incurred. 5, ihP DQVnlgpef Shall provid¢ mQ tQ red Mdt P.r S¢fviCQ 20 pdCh lot O( sdid devP lOmm~nt In dCC nrddO<P with tha ragU ldti0n5, sc hedule5, and fees Of the f,uCamo r.qa Cnu n[v hater ply tric t. 5, the D4Ve toper Shall he res oonsible for rPplac ement, rQ lgcatipn, gr removal of any component or any irrigation water system in cnnflir,[ vif.h tnnsCrn r. tfgn of rr.puir¢d imor ov¢mPnti to th¢ satisfaction of the Li ty Enq ineer and the ownQr of Such water Sy5[Cm, 4 I l u 7. Improvements required to be cons tructeA shall c onfa rm to [he Standard Drawings anA Standard Soec lfications of the Lity, and [p the Improvement Plan ap vraved by and on file in [he office of the City Engineer. Said improvements are tanulated on [he Construe.ion antl 9p ntl Estimate, her ebv incorporated on page 6 her evf, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number, the DevCloper shall also be responsible for construc- tion of any transitions or other inc iAent al work be vonA the tract boundaries as needed for saf ¢[Y and proGer surface Arainaqe. Errors or ommissions discovered durinq constructin shall h¢ corr¢cted upon the direction of the Ci[y Engineer. Revised work due Co said plan modifications shall b¢ covered by the provisfpns of [his agreement and secured by the sore ty covering the original planned works. B. Construction permits shall be oht ained by the Developer from the office of [he City Engineer prior to star[ of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be ohse rued, with attention given to safety procedures, control pf dus [, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to pr ooer notification of vuhlic utilities and City Departments. failure to comply with Mis section shall be subject to the penalties proyieea therefor, 9. the Developer shall be res ponsibie for removal pf all louse rn cks and other debris from public rights-oi-way within or adjoining said Oeve lopmenC resulting from work relative to said develop me nt. lD, Nprk done withfn esistinq streets Shall be dilfgently pursued tD completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and alt cork in the event of unjus H fieA delay 'n completion, and tv recover all cost anA eaoense tecurreA from the Developer and/or his contractor by any lawful means. .I. Said DevC leper shall at dil times followinn Aedica- tton of the streets and eas ¢menu in said subidivisi on, up to the completion and acceptance of sold work or (mprnvement by said City Council, give good and aAequ ate warning to the tr avelinq public of each and every dangerous condition ealstent in saiA street or eas emeu t, and will protect the traveling puhlic from such defective or dangerous Conditions. Ugtil the cg mpletion pf all impf pV¢ment5, her2ln ipL prpnra[Cd on Page 6 to be perf Ormed, each of said streets not accepted as improvements shalt be under the charge of safd Oevelooer. Sa iA Developer may close all nr a portion of any street su b,i ¢ct to the conditions <on[ained in a tem pvrary street closure permit, 7s5u en by the City Engineer, whenever It is necessary to orotect the public durinq the construction of the imprp vpments herein aq re eA tp be made. 12. Parkway treCS required to be planted shall hr Planted by the Developer of ter Other im provem¢nt wore, grading and clea nlm Iles bean comp7eteA, Plantinn shall he Aoqe as prOVlAnd by Ordinance in accord ante with the 0'. an[inp di apr am approved by the Li tv CgmmuniCy Development Director, Th0 Developer shall be responsible for ma in Coining all treys maintenances g0°d health until the Cnd of the goer anteen later. period, or for one year after planting, whichever is I7. Th r. Developer is re sponsihle /or meeting ail c~ndi- tipns Cstablished by [hn f,i ty pursuant to the gvbdivision MaD QL C, Llty Drdlapf ¢S, dnd 11115 dqr P.Q mppC (nf the development, dnd for the malntenaor. e. pf all Improvements constructed thereunder . _2. u until the improvement is ac oevted for maintenance by the City, and no imorov emen! security orovided hereinwith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise orovided and authorized by the City Council of the City. l4, This agreement shall not terminate until the main [en ante guarantee security hereinafter Ae scribed has been releaseA by [he City, or vniil a new agreement together with the requi rod improvement security has heen submitted to the rity by a successor to th^_ herein nameA, and by resolution of the Ci[V Council same has been accented, and this agreement and the improvement security the refor has peen gel ease d. 16, il.e improvement s¢oirity to be furnished by [he Geveloper with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptable by the gity Attorney: • To secure faithful performance of this aqr=emen[, 1. A bond or bo ndz by on? or more Aoiv oath grized corporate sureties in the form and content spe<if ied by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument fn the form anA content specified by the Lity ACto me Y. 3. A deposit wf th the City of money or negotiab l¢ bends of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies. To secure laborers and materialmen: 1. A hood or bo ntls by one or more duly oath prlxeA corporate cur?ties in the farm anA coolant spec iffed by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An tmp rovement Security Instrument In !ne form and content specified by the City Attorney. 7. P Aeposit with Ci tv gf money or negotiable hands O( the kind ap Dr rived fOr securing A cash deposit with the f, itv to gnaran t.eo pa vment by CFe Developer to the engineer or curve vor chose certificate ao pe ors upon the Finai Map for the setting of all boundary, lot cnrne r, anA street centerline monuments and for furnishing centeriine tie notes tp the City. The amount of the deposit may he any amount certified by the enq sneer or su rveynr as acceptabl= payment in full; or, 1f na valve 1s submitted, the cash hood shall be as shown on the Construct inn and fionA Estimate ego twined herein. Said cash deposit may he refunded as soon as proce- dure permits of ter reg ei of by the City of the centerline tie notes and written occur erica of payment in full from [he engineer or surveyor, The requireA by rids and the pr inciDal amounts the real are set fur [h on page 6 of this agreement, 16. The Developer warrants that the imorpv ements tlescri had this airy emenf shall bP fro= from def eels in matCrials anA wnrkmnnshin. Any and all vnrtions of Ihe, Improve- ments found to be Aefec tivp within one (1) veer fDl low inn the data on ahir.h the improvements are act nn led by the City shall be repaireA or replaced by Developer free o/ all charges to the City, Tha Uevelpper shalt tarnish a maintenanc? nu ar antee security in a snm evual to ton perr, en[ IIDX) of the construction estiaate or 5200.07, whichnver Is greater, M secure the fatthlul performance of Oev¢Inp¢r't nblig a[ivns as AescriheA in this para- grapn, The maf ntnnance 7n aranton security shall also secure the faithful perrormanre by thq Developer of any nbligatiDn of the -J- 0¢ve loner to do so ecified wore with resvect to anv narkwav maintenance assessment tlistr ict. Once the imprpvements have been accepted and a maint¢n ante gn grantee security has been acceo ted by She City, the other improvement securi [y descrihed sn this agreement may be released provided fhat such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Nap Rct and any applicable f.ity Ordinance. 17. That [he Oevel oper shall tape out and maintain such public liabi Illy and property Aamage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or su ACpn tr act or oerf orming vg rk covered by this agreement from claims for prvoerty damages which may arise because of the nature of Me work or from ooeratiprs under this agreement, whether such pperati ons he by himself or by anv CO ntra[f or or SubcOntrdtlor, Or an y0 ne directly or ind iredtlV employed by saitl persons, even though such damages he not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or svbcpntr actor or anyone employed by said pe rspns, the public liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as addi[onal insured and directly protect the f, it v, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his cpntrac tors and his subcontractors, and ail insurance policies issued hereunder shall sg state. The minimum amounts of such igsur ante shall be as follows: A. ContraC tar's liability insurance proviAinq hodily In!urv rr ieath liabflity limits of not less tha 3300,000 for each, person and SI,000, 000 /or each accident or occurrence, and proper[v Aamage liabil- ity limits of not less than 5100,000 for each acci- dent or occvrr ence with an aggrepa[e limit of • 5250, 000 `or claims which may rise from the opera- tions of the Developer in the per/ormance of the work herein provided. 8. Antomobi to liability insurance covering all vehicles used In the performance of this agreement providing bodily in,iury liability limits of nut less than 5200,000 for each person and S30U,000 far each accfdent or occurrence, and property Aamage 1labilf ty limits of no[ less than 550,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than 5100,000 which maV aris¢ from the npera- tlpns of the Developer or his Contractor in p¢r Poem log the week provi deA far herein. ' t8. That before the execution o/ this apreemen t, the Developer shall file with the City a ter L111<a to or cerHllc ales of lneurance covering fhe specified Insurance. Each such certif lcate shall Dear an endorsement precluding the cancellations, or reAuction in coverage of any policy eviden<es by such c¢rt ific ate, before the expfrdtfon of thirty (30) Oa vs after the Lity shall have received notification by reoi ate reA mail from the insuranc¢ cdYrier. As evidence of understanding the prnvfsions con [dined herein, anA of intent to comply with same, the Subdivider has sUhmitted the f of lowing described improvement security, and has affixed his slgna tore here tg; • _q. FgITNF UI PERFORMANCE 7yp¢: Bond Principal Amount: S1B0,6a6. 00 Name and atltlr¢ss of sure [y: MpTEPIpL pN0 LggOR PpTNENT Type: Bond Principal gmpunt: E 90,323.00 ryame and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT NONDMENTATIOX Tvpe; Principai Amount: S 2,850.00 Name anU adtlress of surety: NpIXTENANtE GUAR pN TEE Type: Principal gmov nt: I1g,000 AO Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BT THE f,ITT IN N1TNE 55 HE0.E DF, the parties hereto have caused these • or esenls to be duly e[ecu led and acknowledged with atl formalities required by law on [he Aaies set forth opposite tAeir 5~90atgr¢S. THE BEER CREEK CO}1P AHY, d Gene [al Patxne[ship BY; GRIGS B`( BEVELOPNE".' INC , a Ge ne[al Pai Gne[ Date +nr~n g +cps ,by / ,^eve laver ~q nn re y l ~' ~n By: William R. Ce tq sby, p[c yide nt n nted Date March R 1985 by F- P~TIER ENT CRP P.ISESr INC., z Developer ore 1 _ ~` ~ ~~ By: ~ t ~8 _ nfg Accepted: Lity of Rancho Cucamgn qa, Caiffornfa p Municipal Corporation By: Nay9r Attest: gPprovcd: DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE NU ST BE NOT RAILED •5~ ~~~ CITY OF RANLIIO LULh40NGA • ENGINE EA ING DIVISION ENLROACIIMENT PEAM IT FEE SCIIEDIILE For Improvement Trace Nom. 1)6m -t Suu thews[ Lo rner Carnelian 6 Ban an - Oeer Creek Oat x: 2-1-ai Compute Y: 1. L. nedulo a essor mrec File Re erence: it act r1o. V.. - City Drawing ao. 9/3 NOTE: Does not include current fee for writing permit or pavement deposits OUANi1TY VNIT ITfN pAI CE AMOUNT L.F. P.C.C. curb - 12" L.F. 24" 9u tter 7.25 7,)b L.F. P, SL. curb - B" L.F. 24" gu[[¢r fi.00 70.n56.nn L.F. P.C.C. curb only 5.50 55 L.F. A.C. berm A. 50 2a>.50 12 ]~ 19 S.F. 4" P.C.L. sidew dlk LIS it.nny.no tp l . n? S. F. Or ive approach 2.50 35.9oi.oo _ 3 4yio S. F. 8" P.G.C. crass guff tr (inc. curb) 3.40 R.IbD.ND 55 1~_OD C.Y. Str a"_t exc av a[ion L50 ~6i0=o0 L,Y. Imported em0 do kmen[ 1..0 58~s 11 $.F. Preparation of subgr ode 0.15 8.)b2.55 5Bi] S. F. Lrusned agg, base lper inch thick) 0.07 i. of D.u TON A.C. (over 1300 tons) 27.00 TON A.C. (900 to 1J00 tons) 75.00 TON A.L. (500 Ip 900 tons) 45.00 T04 A.L. (under 500 tons) 60.00 59 0 , i1 $.f. R.C. (3" thick) O. SS 12,I x9.15 _ S. F. Patch A.C. (trench) 1.15 In n~ 51b) S.F. 1" thick A.L. overlay 0.70 J,n:o.10 EA. Adjust sewer manhole to grade 250.C0 EA. Adjust sewer clean out fo 9rade 15J.00 EA. Adjust water valves :p grade 75.00 t7 EA. Street lights 1000.C0 u,ano L.F. Barricades (intersec. f500 mtn) 1.00 L.F. 2 x 4" redwaaa header 1,15 S.F. Removal of A.C. pavement 0.75 L.F. Removal of P.L.G. cure 3.30 L.F. Removal of A. L, berm 1.01] EA. Street signs 200.00 euo. o~ EA. Reflectors and posts 35.00 _ L.F. concrete block wall 25.00 S. F. Re[alning wall 20.00 TON Ag9re 9a to haze 7.00 -- C.Y. Loncreee structures 425.00 L.f. 18^ 0.LP (2000 D) 29.00 L.F. 24" ALP (1500 0) 75.00 L.F. )6" RCP (2000 D) 49.00 ' L.F. 48• RCP (1200 D) 76.DO EA. Catch basin N = 4' 2000.00 __ EA. Catch basin N A' 2900.00 EA, Latch hasin N = 22' 4500.00 -- EA. Local depression 4' 500.00 EA. Local d¢press ton 12' 1000,00 __ EA. Junction structure 5000.00 EA. Outlet structure, Std lSOfi 1500.00 I EA. Outlet structure, Std A507 500.00 5nn. o0 EA. Guard posts 40.00 wry L.f, Guard panel (.aod) 25.00 9n0,n0 L.F. $awcut 2.00 EA. headwall (4B" Wing) 4000.00 L.F. Retlwnnd he an er 1,75 z t~ ~n S. F. tandscap ln9 A irrigation 2.15 n,51'Ifii- - L.F. Aoil taro (P,L,L.) ~.~~ ENGINEERING ItISPECilOA FCE 51,p;,1 On SUd TOTAL t5) ONG •RESTORATI011/GiLiNEAil0t1 CA SN ~y~~. pU 0001 I:IG RICY LO5T5 'IS",) DE POSI7 (REN NDA OLE) fAI rIIF I1L PER FOAMANCE 60'!0 (I00%) INn.64 MOIN141rtAT10H SURE 7Y (CASH) x.ASn ^_`n LAOOR AND MATERIAL OOND (50X) 9n.rz i. no apursuant to City of Aancha Lucaman9a Mun it{pal Lode, Tit to E, Chapter 1,08, adapting fM , Bernardino county Lode Titles, Chapters 1-5, a rash restoration/delineation deposit shill be made pr for to issuance of an En9ineering Construction Permit. ,, .,'s(;,;,,_ 1.Y'6 Nond •:o :9 LO TSO:. ~' :re miun:d1.805 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE aonN NNEREAS, the Ci[y Lpuncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, $ta[p of Cal ifarnia, and The Ocer Creek Can an (hereinafter designated as "pn nc,pal" v ave en [ered into an . agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain tlesi gna led public improvements, which said agreement, dated ,uxcN N 198 ' and identified az project L'Y01-I is Te eby referred to and made a car'[ ner eof;and, NNEREAS, said principal is required under [he terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful per Pormance of said agreement. NNN, THfR Ef Ofl f, '+C [he principal dnd nF.VF.LOPF.PT IY SC WVYCE COYPA.VY as surety, are held and firmly bountl unto the hty of Rancho Cucamonga (hereina(ter called 'City"), in the penal ram of pne Nundred-F.i elrtv Thousand, Etx Ilund red and Forty SL Dollars IJO 6afi aw u money o [h e~Uns [ed Sates, or [he payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, succe TSprT, exec utofs antl ddml0lstrdt ors, Jointly and severally, firmly by these Oresen [s. The condi[i on of this obligation is such [hat if the above bpi:n ded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep antl perform the covenants, cpndi[i ons and . Vrovisrons in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on hss ar their part, to b¢ kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according [o their true intent ana maanin g, and shall Indemnify and save harmless Lity, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then obis oblination shall became null and void; otherwise, tt shall be and remain In full farce and effect. As a part of the obliga[ipn secured hereby and to addition to the face amp un[ specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable edpenses and lees, includf ng reasana 6le attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to he taxed as costs and included in any Judgment rendered, The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that ro change, extension of time, alteration or addtti on [o [he terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed lhereuntler Or the specl- fica[ions accomp anying the same shall to anywise a/f ec[ its obligations on this bond, and i[ does hereby waive notfce of any such change, extension o: time, a: ter anon or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specific atlons. IN N[1NESS NH Efl EOF, this instrument has been duly executed by _. [he Drincipal and sorely above named, on tla rch 9 , ~- -- 198 ~, , T IIE pE[iii CREEK CGNPASI', a Ge octal Pa[tner ship VY: GR[G9 C'[ niiVE WP;IEti^ tNC/r n Genurat Partnr-f •.,ln rcrs ins uran cc Company % v(~ aped /r Sure[yT CY0W111iam Il. fri m[, P[n.5 ent qa BY: k'RUNTi PJI IiIITHRPNIGF.S, It:C., n G¢nnial ~t__"~n~~~ Pat^.y ~'}, natu e) -~- A[tp me Y•:n-Facti- i a ~ OaVIO C.Ilanfer '~ -> ~ti`~'`C 'r r gy; Paul E. rriE P~~; SEr• TACII POY E[R OF ATTNRNE I' TN ALL BONUS SIGNATU0.ES MUST BE NUTARI2EU .:_... _,. included is rEO rmdnce LABDR AND MATERIALMEH eonD NNEAEA S, th¢ City Council of [he Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, Slate of California, and me Deer cre c'+ Cuman n~ (hereinafter designated as "pn nc:pol") nave er.t=red into an agreement whe r¢Dy prinnpal agrees to ~nc;all and complete cer[afn designated pu b7 is improvements, 'whr ch said agreement, dated v,~RCii s 19DS antl rd¢ntif ietl as pra]ec: L':D.-1 is he re ]y referred to and made a part hereof; and MNEAEAS, under the terms of said ag icemen[ pn ncipal is re vu ll ed Defpre entering upon the performance pf the wort, to file a goad and cuff lcrent payment Dond with the City pf Rancho CUC a!nOn9d td s¢CUra [IIC Claims LO •nlCh rCfpfenC¢ r5 mddP rn ii [le 15 (comet enci n9 wifh Secr ;on 3O°21 of ParC d of Of vision J DT the Livil Cade pf [he State pf Calrform a. NOM, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersignetl as a cprp or ate surely, are held firmly by antl unto [he City of flanchp Cu r.amonga and all Contractors, su bcpntr actors, 7aborars, ma'.erialmen and other persons e'.loyed in [he Derforman ce of Che of uresaid agreement and referred [o in the of oresdrd COdo Df LiVll Pr0[e duff rn [F.C Sum of %inely TLOUSand-Th tee Nundr¢d 'Nenty TF ree Dollars (590.123 ), (or matan ils urnished or labor ehereon of 'any kind, or for amounts tlve under the UnemDlDyment Ipsurance Act pith respect [o such work or labor, that card surety wrl: pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount heYeinaDpve se[ /Drth, and also ip Case suit is brouDh[ upon this band will pay in addition t0 the face amount :hereof, costs and reasonable expQn5C5 and f¢P5, In Clndin9 rEaSpndD1C dttOfn2y's fPPS, InCUrf Pd by City in su<ce ssful7y enf Dicing such pbitgation, Co De awar dad and fixed Dy [he roar[, and to be taxed as casts antl Ip be • Included in the judgment [herein rendered. I[ is hereby expressly stipulated and agre¢' th a: this band Shrill InprP LD tM1¢ dCnPfi[ of dpy and all persons, [a?pLniQS 30d corporations entitled to file claims under title t5 (commencing with SeR ion 3082) a/ Par[ d of Oivison 3 of the Ci vrl Cade, so as [D give a right of action [o them or their assigns rn any suit Dro ugh[ upon t't is bond. ShOUItl the cOnditiDn of this bond De fully pert armed, then this obligation snail became null and void, otherwise it shalt De and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates ano agrees that no change, extension of time, nl teration or addition tp [he terms DI solo agreement ar the specifications ac[o mp an yi n9 the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this band, a0A r[ does here- by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteratiDn or addition. ' 1N NITNE SS MHEAEOF, this instrument has been duly =+ecuted by the Orincipal and surety above named, on - 19q i !_- TIL: i)Ga CrtY F.N CClIPAS'1'i a cxc ral Po[tneeehip dY: Gfl 1G.^,p 1' D'uViagPwFj;iT, li:C.,,n General PdFtner /.LaCl~zu„t' h_ 7 NY: Wi:: lam t. Gr>rysb,~,~ir reT a•!anb Dc': c!^o.: rs ins:- -.x rorrnany ~Developerl lsurety :• - DY: FRpNTICi-. FNTE; R{'H15ES, i::C., a Ca ne r,Rl fart nrr T~--'c~7-v~_ S490diu ra -- AU ¢rney-:n-fact) rte'' t '(J 0~: Paul U. Gti E~ ~ Jr. uPeesadc nc PLEASE ATTpf.N PDM FA DF pTTORHEY i0 ALL BONGS SIONA7OgES NIISi BE NDiAR TEED .-. RESOLUTION N0.-€03-20.pgR ~ `'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHC CUCAttONGA, CAL IF ORIIIA, APPROVING iMP ROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROV Eh1ENT SECURITY, AND FINAL t•tAP OF TRACT N0. 12801-1 WHEREAS, the Ten±ative t•1ap of Tract No. 12801-1, consisting of 33 lots, submitted by The Oeer Creek Company, Subdivider, located on the south side of Banyan Street, east of Carnelian Street has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6y said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compi fiance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements est abiished as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering far dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement 6e and the same is approved and the tdayor is authorized to execute same . on behalf of said Ci±y and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That aaid Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to farm and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final tdap delineating same he approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROV EO, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. AYES: NOES ABSENT: don 0. ttikels, Mayor ATTEST: '~ everly A. Authe let, City Clerk jaa C~ • CITY OF RAtiCHO CtiCd310KGA STAFF REPORT DRTE: March 20, 198 T0: City Corm cil and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hu bbs, City Engineer I SUBJECT: Release of Bonds Tract No, 9638 - Located north of Lemon, 'dent of Arch ihald DEVELOPER: Cri smar Oeve looment Corp. P.0. Box 213 Santa Monica, CA 90406 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond E8,460.00 U CUGbfp ZOO ~C7 i n 5~ T. LII ~ 7 ~~'I ~s yen The one year maintenance period on Tract No. 9638 has passed and the necessary corrections and maintenance have been made. It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $8,450.00, ~` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAilIONGA STAFF REPORT • DATE: March 20, 19f36 T0: City Council and City idanager FROM: Lloyb B. Huhhs, City Engineer BY: Jae Stofa Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of a Pipeline License between the Atchison, Topeka and S ante Fe Railway Company and the City in connection with Tract No. 11606-1 located east of Haven Avenue hetween Base Line Road and 19th Street and also the approval of an agreement between the developer, Barclays-TAC, and the City. The A.T. & S. F. Railway Company has issued the attached Pipeline License to the City of P,ancho Cucamonga for the construction of a storm drain pipe beneath the tracks in connection with the development of subdivisions and commercial property located east of Haven Avenue from Lemon Avenue southerly to the A.T. & S.F. Railway tracks. Barclays-TAC, the developer of Tract No. 11606-1, in order to fulfill the construct icn requirements as stipulated in the Pipeline License, has submitted an agreement which is also attached far approval. RECOMMENIIATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Pipeline License between the City and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Res ectfuily su mitted, LB H:J :ko Attachments • AGRE'e MENT THIS AGRE E~'~1ENT made and entered into this day of 1985, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CULAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a Municipal corporation, hereinafter "City" and Barclays - TAC hereinafter "Developer", provides as follows: R E C I T A L S WHEREAS, there is attached hereto: (I) Exhibit "A" a proposed Pipeline License, hereinafter "Contract", between the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, hereinafter "Railroad" and the City for the construction of one (1) pipeline, 75" in diameter (hereinafter, called the • "Pipeline"), across or along the right of way of Licensor at or near the Station cf Grapeland (E.S.-2165 + JI), County of San Bernardino, State of California, the exact location of the Pipeline being mare particularly shown upon the print hereto attached, No. LADE -02, dated August 25, 1964, marked "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof,WHE REAS, Developer desires that said Pipeline be built to facilitate development of his project. WHEREAS, City is willing to enter into the Contract on ty if Developer pays all costs of constructing the Pipeline and agrees to in all respects, assume and perform the obligations of the City under the Contract; and, WHEREAS, Developer is willing to do the same. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Developer agree as follows: (1) City shall execute and deliver to Railroad the Contract (2) Within fifteen (15) days after written demand by City, Developer -1- shall deposit with City the sum of 5525.00 as a security for the payment of • compensation for the license. (3) Developer shall construct said Pipeline and in so doing shall in all respects comply with all terms and conditions of the Contract. Developer shall pay, without limitation, all costs of constructing the Pipeline (4) Developer shall require that each contractor of Developer engaged for the purpose of constructing the Pipelinz, execute and comply with all "contractor's agreements" which are required by the Railroad, as well as compiy with all terms and provisions of the Contract. (5) Oe veloper shall insure that each contractor engaged by Developer for the construction of the Pipeline, or any part thereof, has the City named as an additional insured on each policy of insurance that the contractor is required to furnish pursuant to the terms of the Contract or Indenture. (6) Developer agrees to indemnify City from and against all costs, • expense, claims and liabilities far injury to or death of persons (including, but not limited to, passengers and employees of Railroad and employees of City), and damage to or loss of property (including, but not limited to, property owned, leased, occupied or used by or in the care, custody or control of Railroad or the employees of Railroad or City or the employees of City), however, same may be caused, resulting from arising out of or in any any connected with this Agreement or the construction of the aforesaid undersigned project, whether or not caused or contributed to by any negligent act or omission on the part of any of City's agents or employees. (7) Should either party bring suit to compel performance of this Agreement or to recover for breach of any covenant or condition contained herein, the prevailing party shall pay reasonable attorneys fees in addition • _2. • to the amount of judgement and casts. (8) Time is of the essence of this Agreement. (g) This Agreement may be modified or amended on iy by an instrument in ~,vriting executed by both parties. (10) This Agreement shall be binding and shall inure to the benefit of successors and assigns of the parties hereto. IN 41ITNESS IJHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. BARCLAYS -TAC B • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAh10NGA BY; JON D. MIKELS, h1AY0R ATTEST BY: Severely A. Authelet, City Clerk - Approved as to_ Form: ~-- Gity Attorney -3- .4N0 wIREN gECOROEO MNIL TO • °`~ Deed Audit No. 163139 ~., ""' Lease Audit No. ... ~ ~"' ... '• I I L '-- "---' SP/1CE HBOVE THIS LINE FOP RECOROE R'S USE M.P. BHO-524 N8-X THLS IN DENTDRE, dated this 7rr. day of /~C'C e~R/t'r ~ lggq by and between SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a corporation, herein " called Railroad;' and CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMON GA, a municipal corporation of the ' S tats of California, mailing address: 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, herein called "Grantee"; WITNESSETH: I. For end in corusideration of [he sum of Five Hundred Twenty-five Dollars (5525) , Railroad hereby grants to Grantee, subject to the reservations, covenants and conditions herein contained, an easement to reconstruct, maintain end operate a 76" diameter pipeline (C-76, C1essl~ herei natter termed "structure;' Cor the conveying of storm drainage waters, across and beneath the property and track of Railroad at or near Railroad's Station of • Baldwin Perk, County of Orange, State of Celiforni e, at Railroad's Mile Post BBO-524.18 , Engineer Steti on 2165+71, in the approximate loceti on itlustrated on the print of Railroad's Drawing ?J O. LADE-02, Sheet No. I1, dated riugust 26, 1984, attached hereto end made a part hereo [. Said structure shell be installed in accordance with minimum standards of Form CS. L741, attached end made a part hereof; provided that such standards are not in conflict with, nor less then those required by law. It is understood and agreed said structure shell be irutalled beneath Railroad's property find t; ack at the above location b`l Anacal Engineering Co., a corporation, pursuant to the terms of a separate agreement to be entered into with ReBroad. This indenture shell not be effective until such time Grantee accepts the structure as part of its storm draina e g system. Grantee shall notify Railroad of such date. • DK67,DCI4 - 1 - r 2. Project markers in form end size satisffletery to Railroad, identifying the facility and its owner, will be installed end constantly maintained by and at the expense of Grantee _ `at Railroad's proporty lines or such locations as Railroad shall approve. Such markers shall be relocated or removed upon request of Railroad without expense to Railroad. Absence of markers does not constitute a warranty by Railroad of no subsurface installations. 3. This gran[ is made subject end subordinate to the prior end rnntinuing right end obligation of Rallroad, its successors and assigns, to use all the property described herein in the performance of its duty es a common carrier, end there is reservetl rarto Railroad, its successors and assigns, the right (consistent with the rights herein granted) to reconstruct, maintain, and use existing and future railroad tracks, facilities and appurtenances end existing and future transportation, communication, and pipeline facilities and appurtenances in, upon, over, wder, across, and along [he property. 4. This grant is made subject to ell licenses, leases, easements, restrictions, conditions, covenants, encum hranees, liens, and claims of title which may effect the property and the word "grant," as used herein, shall not be construed as a covenant against the existence of any [hereof. 5. Grantee shall bear the entire cost and expense of reconstructing, and maintaining the structure upon the property. Grantee agrees. that ell work upon or .n connection with the structwe shall be done et such times and in such manner as not to interfere in any way whatsoever with the operations of Railroad. The plans for and the reconstruction of the structure shell be subject to the approval of Rairoad. Grantee agrees to reimburse Railroad Cor the cast and expense to Railroad of furnishing • any materials or performing any labor in connection with the reconstruction, maintenance, and removal of the structure, including, but not limited to, the installation and removal of such falsework and other proteeti on beneath or along Railroad's tracks, and the furnishing of such waichm an, Ragmen, end inspectors as Railroad deems necessary. 6. In the event Railroad shell et any time so require, Grantee, at Grantee's expense, shall reconstruct, alter, or otherwise improve the structure upon receipt of written notice from Railroad so to do. 7. Grantee shall, at its expense, comply with all applicable laws, regulations, rules end orders, regardle$ of when they become or became effective, including without limitation those slating to health, safety, noise, environmental protection, waste disposal, end water end air qual(ty, and furnish satisfactory evidence o[ such compliance upon request of Railroad. Should any discharge, leakage, spillage, emission or poLLution of any type occur upon or arise from the premises covered hereunder as a resWt of Grantee's use, presence, operations or exercise of the rights granted hereunder, Grantee shell, at its expense, be obligated to clean all property affected thereby, whether owned or controlled by Railroad, or any third person, to the satisfaction of Railroad (insofar as the property owned or controlled by Railroad is concerned) and any governmental body having jurisdiction in the matter. Railroad may, at its option, clean Railroatl's premises; if Railroad erects to do so, Cran[ee shalt pay Railroad the cost of such cleanup promptly upon the receipt of a hill therefor. Grantee agrees to investigate, release, indemnity and defend Railroad Crom and against art liability, cost and expense (including, without limitation, any tines, penalties, judgments, litigation costs and -2- DK65,UC28,P2 attorney tees) incurred by Aeilroed as a resut of Grantee's breach o[ this section, or es a result of any such discharge, leakage, spillage, emission or pollution, regardless of whether such liability, cost or expense arises during the time this indenture is in effect or thereafter, unless such liability, cost or expense is proximately caused sclaly and exclusvely 6y the• active negligence of Railroad, irs officers, agents or employees. 8. As part consideration, Grantee agrees to pay Ratlroad an amount equal to any and all assessments which may be levied by order of any authorized ]awfW body against the property of Railroad (and which may have been paid by Railroad) to defray any part of the cost or expense incurred in connection with the presence of the structure upon the property within one (I) year from the date first herein written. 9. Grantee, its agents and employees, subject to provisions hereof, shall have the privilege oC entry on the property Cor the purpose oC reconstructing, meintai ring, and making necessary repairs to the structure. Grantee agrees to give Railroad Cive (5) davs' written notice prior to commencement of any work on the structure, except emergency ~repai rs, in whi rh event Grantee shall notify Railroad's authorized representnti vas by phone. Grantee agrees to keep the property and the structure in good and safe condition, tree from waste, so Cnr ¢s affected by Grantee's operations, to the satisfaction of Railroad. If Grantee fails to keep the property end the structure in ¢ good and safe condition, free from waste, then A¢ilroad may perform the necessary work at the expense of Grantee, which expense Grantee agrees to p¢v to Railroad upon demand. 10. In the event any work upon or in connection with the structure or its appurtenances, to be done upon or adjacent to the tracks and property oC Railroad, shoWd be let to a cant ractor by Grantee, such work shell not be begun until such crontrector shell have first entered into an ngreem en[ with Railroad, satisfactory to Rairoad, and indemnifying Railroad from and against all claims, liability, cost, and expense growing out of the performance of the work to be done Dy such contractor. 11. Insofar as it lawfully may, Grantee agrees [o investigate, release, defend and • indemnify Railroad, its officers, employees, agents, Successors and assigns, from al: claims, liability, mat and expense howsoever same may be caused, including reasonable attorney Cees, for loss of or damage to property and for injuries to or death of persons arising out of the reconstruction, maintenance, presence, use or removal of the structwe, regardless of any negligence or alleged neglig~.ce, active, passive or otherwise, on the pilrt of Railroad's employees. The word "Railroad," as used in this section, shall be construed to include, in eddi flan to Railroad, the successors, assigns, and affiliated crompanies of Railroad and any other railroad company that may be lawfully operating upon and over the freaks crossing or adjacent to the structure, and the officers and employees thereof. 12. Should Grantee, its successors or assigns, et any time abandon [he use of the property, or any part thereof, or fail at any time to use the same for the purpose contemplated herein for s continuous period of one (1) year, the right hereby given shall cease to the extent of the use so abandoned or discontinued, end Railroad shall at once have the right, in addition to, but not in qualification of, the rights hereinebove reserved, to resume exclusive possession oC the property or the pert thereof the use of which is so discontinued or abandoned. Upon termination of the rights and privileges hereby granted, Grantee, at its own cost and expense, agrees to remove the structure from the property end restore the property es nearly ns practicable to the same stele end condition in which it existed prior to the construction of the structure. ShoWd Crentee in such event fail, neglect, or refuse to remove the structure end restore the property, such removal and restoration may be performed by • Railroad, et the expense of Grantee, which expense Grantee agrees to pay to Railroad upon demand, or Railroad may, et its option, assume ownership of the structure. - 3 - D K65, D C28,P 3 13. In the event all or any portion of the property o[ Railroad subject to this easement shall be taken or condemned for public use (including conveyance by deed in Eeu of or in settlement of condemnation proceedings), Grantee shall receive compensation only for the taking and damaging of Grantee's structure. Any other rnmpensatlon or damages arising out of such taking or condemnation awarded to Grantee shall lre assigned try Grantee to Railroad. TR6 INDENTURE Shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WtIERBOP, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in duplicate the day end year first herein written. SOUTHERN PACI~/~ICG~'j~'R~AfN/~SPORTATION COMPANY Attest: / ~~' V --~ S ecretery CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ey - ~ eyor ay - Clerk DK6S,DC28,P4 - 4 t ~' !.~ t I `~ ~. ;, ~1 ~I I ~~ l e,~ ! JI I I.;' = o m a .1 m u a W ro - a n n n D cnmr ~ - _ s ~ 0 m _ - _ 3 0 4 a ~ 0 _ w~~: _ _- v+~ -I ~ i~n; ~za~ln ~ - _^3 _ L i = ~ _ .3v a m ~I _ - - > ~ DD Z ~ k o~~ ~ ~ ~ y _ n o ~ a y r '~ L I ^ ~ ~ ' _ 9 I c o O~ W rla ~' L c 1 4 - ' _ " ~ - ^ __ _ 2 O o I - - ~? m D" _ 2 N A Z D b 2 3 C i mo ~ _I a: ro m~~ 9i2 b ~ °v n H u Q . T ~_ o f ~ T A ~m'O m ° M - - a m.x i - ' ! a" o f c ' 3 l i r O~ 'P m o I~ ~ ~~ W m ~ ~ ~ ` ~ N r v • O I S A b - ~ 3 _ __'-[~ " „_o° o°.-'I~ is a ~ Ui ( nN y ' I - I o 2 ~ m~ ~ = I / ~ a "_ ~ m . m ~ r _ _ . a°m ~ u '~ ! y I _ _ 0 47 I I _ }} ISIH lIO ]Q<ig.9YI~XJ4'CONC BON nZ ~ - / nO TI I I " I P _= I I I I I y 1 I '.+~=.i;iF ll ~ ;e ~~m L ~ l I ~ I ~ ~^ q ~ q N~ai ~e In ~ ~ ~ ! I I~ ' I 3 F 1~~ • ~y n ~ E a Y 4 _ ? d Y ~ 5~. __ :Y°' dam'-: '3~tlf 1~LaF :~' to ~ 1 'x::?... Leu a Y{~°~~'li ~'~~~ ,`' ~l. . '~'3~ c aq33~: e 5 ^ I i t t.ae.aae1 Ui• `9ia'S.: qty°~s° ".'~$o`~ .";.:;< ^ °,~> ~ i a ° ~ ei ~ <~ a°.3 q ~,C ,IYIO ~ s~°39 a i a ~i. ^i PP=a ~1 ~•B4p S• do :. 3 ° _ $ f6 a L A i O ^ O 2 C N, N OI ~ S f 9 C L c~n=i (\/ o>r N° 'j '~N6z*'^ i'. x ^' m e N V F1 e 9 m r_ ~, 1 ti J[ 6 m VI s ~~ ~~.I?~ Y b e~'a'~~ . ~"~~a Ian ~3~"me x,<< ~ ' J ~~` .~ °~~ ~~~ o~ °~ a m RESOLUTION N0. E=93=20-02R • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANiONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PIPEL iNE LICENSE BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE ATL'H ISON TOPEKA ANO SANTA FE RAILWAY FOR THE RISTALLATIOf7 OF A STORI.1 DRAIN PIPE BENEATH THE RAILROAD TRACKS WHEREAS, a storm drain pipe is required to be installed beneath the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway tracks near the Station of Gr apeland (E.S. 2165+71), County of San Bernardino, State of California for project, Tract No. 11606-i; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California has for its consideration a Pipeline License between the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and the City for the right to install the storm drain pipe at the above location. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Pipeline License be and the same is hereby approved by the idayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign same on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikel s, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa ~.. , • AGREEMENT FOP. LEGAL SERVZCES This Agreement is entered into by and between the CITY OF FANCHO CiJCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("CITY" hereinafter) and LAW OFFICES OF JAMES L. MARAMAN, A Prcfessional Corporation ;"ATTO RLIEY" hereinafter). It is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Term. The operative date of this Agreement shall be March 8, 1985 and the Agreement shall continue in effect unless and until terminated as provided herein or until mutually resc i~.de d. 2. City Attorney Basic Services. • ATTOPNEY shall furnish to CITY all basic legal services as counsel to the City Council, City staff and boards and comis- sions, including attendance at Council meetings and at Planning Commission meetings, consultation with Council Members and with management staff personnel as needed and the review and/or preparation of ordinances, resolutions, contracts and other documents having legal significance. Excluded from said basic services of ATTORNEY are criminal prosecutions handled by the San Bernardino County District Attorney, litigation, including litigation where defense is furnished by any insurance carrier or pursuant to a self-insurance program, other litigation where the City Council decides to retain special counsel, bond work reeuiring services of bond counsel, personnel hearings and work -1- • in preparing therefor, other sere as where the CITY decides it appropriate to retain special counsel and services wherein ATTORNEY has, in its judgment or that of the City Council, a conflict of interest. ATTORNEY, and its employees, is an independent contractor and not an employee of CITY. JAMES L. MARKMAN shall be and hereby is designated as "City Attorney" and shall have primary responsibility for prcviding services hereunder. ANDREh V. ARCZYNSKI shall be and he re6y is desig- nated as "Assistant City Attorney." ATTORNEY may designate such employed lawyers as deemed necessary as "Deputy City Attorney." 3. Board and Commission Meetings. ATTORNEY 5ha11 not be required to and 5ha11 not attend • the meeting of any CITY board or commission other than as pro- vided in Paragraph 2 above without the prior oral or written request of the City Manager, or if that position should be vacant, or in absence, the person the City Manager or the City Council designated to so act or to aut for the City Manager. Attendance by ATTORNEY at any such meeting shall be compensated at the hourly rates specified in Paragraph 4(B) below. 4. Fees and Expenses. A. ATTORNEY shall be compensated for the basic ser- vices described in Paragraph 2 hereof to be performed by ATTORNEY in an amount of Three Thousand Pive Hundred Dollars ($3,500.00) per month prorated for any partial month on a thirty-day month • basis; and _Z_ B. ATTORNEY shall additionally be compensated for all work performed in preparation for and in conducting litiga- tion for CITY and for other services specified in Paragraph 2 above delivered by ATTORNEY other than basic services as follows: (i) At the rate of Ninety Dollars ($90.C0) per hour for tt:e services of .TAMES L. MARICMAN; (ii) At the rate of Eighty Dollars ($80.00) per hour for the services of ANDRDFi V. ARCZYNSAI; and (iii) At the rate of Seventy Dollars ($70.00) par hour for associate lawyers. C. CZTY and ATTORNEY agree that the fee for basic services specified in Paragraph 4.A and rates specified in Para- • graph 4.B may be modified by supplemental mutual agreement by the parties hereto from time to time, provided that ATTO RPIEY shall not request any such modification to become effective prior to the co~,clusion of CiTY's fiscal year 1985-86. D. ATTORNEY shall be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incident to services performed in addition to other payments provided for herein, such out-of-pocket expenses to include extraordinary reproduction costs and travel and lodging expenses in the event ATTORNEY is required to travel other than in San 3ernardino County, Los Angeles County or Orange County areas on behalf of CITY. Chargeable automobile mileage shall be charged at the rate of Twenty-one Cents ($.21) per mile. -3- 5. Statements and Payments. • ATTORNEY shall present a statement for services rendered and expenses incurred on a monthly basis and CITY shall pay the amount on said statement upon presentation or within a reasonable time. Each such statement shall ge r.e rally indicate the scone of basic services to each CITY department fer the month reflected in the statement. 6. Contact with City Council. Should it become necessary fer ATTO RMEY to directly contact the City Council, ATTO[li7EY shall do so by contacting the Mayor. If the Mayor is unavailable, ATTORNEY shall contact the Mayor Pro Tem and if both the Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tem are unavailable, ATTORNE'! shall contact any other Council Member. • 7. Indemnity. ATTORNEY shall indemnif}', save harmless and defend CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents and employe~c, including the payment by P.TTO RiIEY for any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property in any manner arising out of or incidental to the performance by ATTORNEY of this Agreement. 8. Te nnination. This Agreement, and attorney services hereunder, may be terminated upon Ninety (90) days' written notice provided by either party to the other party hereto. Upon any such termina- tion, ATTORNEY will supply orderly transitional services at the prevailing hourly rates for lawyers then employed by ATTORNEY. S -a- WHEREFORE, the parties have executed this Ayreement as of the dates set forth 6e iow opposite the name of each such party. Dated: CITY OF RANCHO CllCAMONGA A Municipal Corporation ay By City Clerk Dated: /~,/==!// .1 194_`% LAW OFFICES OF JAGS L. MARKMAN ' ~ A Professional Corpo~,~r,-a~t~i~on~ ,lames L. Markmarc, President -5- • CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~p LLCnMO ~(~/~` ~9 <;i f~~D }i ~ A Z ,l (D ~$ii • DATE: March 20, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Richard Carrillo, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Award of Amethyst Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Contract Sealed proposals for the above referenced project were opened in the office of the City Clerk on Tuesday, March 12, 1985 at 10:00 am. Proposals submitted were as follows: Cedric C. Elias, Pomona - $29,141.26 Val Foth & Sons, Chino $32,494.55 White Construction, West Covine - $36,429.30 Laird Construction, Montclair - $41.027.50 Great Venture, Riverside - $41,059.65 DeArmvnd Construction, Rancho Cucamonga - $70,406.00 R Bid Summary of Proposals is attached for your information. RECOMENUATION It is recommended that Council approve the award of the Contract far Improvement of Amethyst Avenue Sidewalk to Cedric C. Elias Paving Contractors of Pomona, California the lowest, responsible bidder, for the amount of $29,741.26 plus 10% contingencies. The total amount not-to-exceed $32,715.26. Respectfully su bmitt~d, ~~ ~ ~ / / ~ti~~~ ~~~ f" LBH:RC: as (-' Attachment 6 €~€s~€ = ~~~ sa ~~^ . ~~ Q _ ' • r -' v F v ^ pp . ~ xr ~€ ~€sssss c ~€ 8€ 8 s E ~ 8~ D ~ u P LL' ~ e m v- ~ a v ~ n . - C N CC C C C C C O C rC" O n C C s.€°°€P~ - ~~~~, • J e m ~ s€€s s€ss°°°s ~ so o~~ - N..,~ ..,~~Nee .. ~ 0 amo ~$ _ 6 ~..a .P j €a~ s~ °ss ~s~ °s a ~~ s °°°ss a~ m ~ g m e a~~a s~€dse ss I C ~~ o~~ os W N N .+ of N N N n .n q N M it1 N 0 l 0 O O ~ o o ~w J ~ Pm p m p m O ~ E ~ C ~ .i gyn.-. O v ~ ~E n m v tY . u ~ P J N a 3 L R• I u d dr A p V 6 L U ~ V m ~ NN Y W b . U U 4.~ y i y ^ U 7 bm pg N 6 6 4 1- C 6 K p F d t i-r N fn O . o .: N h .C n m P .~ Y r`rmv nc n n nrrun rr rr n nnnnrn_ n STAFF REPORT • GATE: March 20, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Slane M. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer 502,7E CT: Approval of Street Frontage Construction Reimbursement Agreement between Robert A. and Shirley A. Lees and the City of Rancho Cucamonga The attached agreement between the City and Robert A. and Shirley A. Lees provides for the widening and improvement of Base Line Road. The property owner has agreed to reimburse the City the cost of constructing new curb, gutter and sidewalk and a Grant of Roadway Easement to allow for the full widening of the street. These latter improvements are to be paid for by the City. A Construction Estimate, a copy of the Grant of Easement and a copy of the Plan showing the noted improvements are found as exhibits to the Agreement. The workings will be constructed as part of Capital Improvement Project No. 800-84-01, the Improvement of Base Line Road from Teak May to Haven Avenue. RECOMENDATION It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Street Frontage Construction Reimbursement Agreement between Robert A, and Shirley A. Lees and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submit' d, ~~~ LBH:B :jag Attachments RECORDING REQUESTED eY: anA MNEN RE CORDED MAIL T0: CITY CtE RN CITY OF RANCHO CULAMOYGA P. 0. Box R07 RANCHO LOCH MO'IGA, CAL IF OANIA 91]_'0 STREET FRONTAGE CONSTRUCTION REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT THI$ AGREEMENT, mace and entered into this day of 1985, by and he iween Robert a. :ees and Shirley A. Lees, husband and wife (hereinafter ref erretl to as "Developer"~, and [he CITY OF RP NCNO CULAMON GA, LAL IF CRNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinaf t¢r referred to as "City), provides as follows: NHERE AS, the Developer desires that the Lity construct said improvements in conjunction with Li ty's project as described • in Exhibit "A" Plans for the Improvement pf Base Line Raad fr on Te i'a Nay [o Nav en Avenue. NHERE AS, the Ogvetoper desires to make payment to Lity far casts of such improvements, as determined by the City; and NHERE AS, the CI[y is agreeable to Pave such Improvements completed a5 part of [he above noted City project. NON, THEREFO0.E, THE PARTIES AGREE: 1. The City will furnish all labor, eRUl pmept an0 material, and pay all casts inciAent tp the installation in accord ante with plans and speciticati pns approved by [he Lity Engineer of the Lity, for the frontage im provemee is described in Exhibit "L" Estimate for Frpntaoe Improvements along the street adjoining Me parcels of land described in Exhibit "B" Easement for Roadway and 0.elated_Pur poses. 2. the lost ell atipn of said frontage improvement shall be completed at the same time as the improvements for the Cily'2 prOj eCt Impr OVe Rase L1ne ROdd fYOm Ied1' Ndy CO NdVen AVCnYe. 1 n u 3. peveloper heresy agrees to re+mEurse h ty an amount of 52,559.5: a5 described in Exhi Dit "C" attcned hereto. Said amounts are bas¢d upon an estimate of cost, peveloper shall pay td LILY too LOt al inOUnL 1n One inst3110E112 due and pay ah l¢ wi Lein 30 days fram [he date of the eaecut tan of this Agreement. a. Tn¢ peveloper does by t'nese presents conveys to [he City, an Easement for 3oadw ay and Related Purposes over the pre uerty descrioed in Exhi pit "9" attached hereto. 1I I1 u • ~i IN NITNESS uNERE OF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above uriY en. CITY CITV CF RANCHO CUCAMO4GA, CAL IF DRNIA, a municipal torpor anon BY: „on 0. Mlaels Mavo A iTESi: everly A. Authe et Ci tY Clerk •u•+u ew wre•wua+~t~rw~u uww r~w.,ww,wwu•«~~~~.:~w~u ~~uw»r• STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS COUNTY OF SAN GERNAR DING) On ,19 ,before me • [he and ersigned Notary Plib ic, oersonally antl AEVERLY 0.. AUTHELET personally known apPe ared J N to me to be D. MINELS the Mayor and City Clerk, resDecti vel y, of the CIT Y OF RANCHO CUCA MONG A, LAL IFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known t0 me to Se the persons who exec urea the within in scan ent nn behal f of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to ae that such municipal corporation executed it. NITNESS MY HANG AND OFFICIAL SEA: . Notary ign- ate STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF SPN GERNAR DING) 9 On F~hist e ~' day, of 1~9C(/o/i ~~~5 before he Ind rsl,gned Notary ub is persona'r apD~e areE 'lx ~ LCr S ri niC ~hrr lBo, .`~1 ~ t<'~ persona !y kk mown ip me ~ ( pr cued to me cn the basis cf satisfactory ev7dence to be the person(s) whose name (s; :i r'i. subscribed to the within instrument and acknowl egetl that executed it. H[iNESS MY IIANO .:NG OFFICIAL SEAL. ~~ ~ OFFICIAL Si.At \ j ~~ ~ JUGHU A ACOiT~ I/ e ~L~:/ ~n 'Ycr9.'r uonn omv:.c ,,a y~.r..: r'df ~i Jn auwmxo wxn ~~ No'~tar~i9nature Iry amn. rrq,y NII }O, INS/ NOTE: NNEN DOCUMENT IS ERECUTEO BT A CORPOg11ilON OR PARTNERSHIP. THE BBOYE BCRNOMLE DGEMEXI IS NOT IICCEPTNBLE. A COR POR~T[ON/PARTF€kSA1T~LTCFQGLE OGENE NT IS RE QUIRE O. DEVELOPER R03 EAT A. LEES AND ~ ~~ ~ s'rC ~ .. '. ri. , f <O..ttlT t4(:f .;i' / (v/Er p vpo.OL' '~~. M ~•P~ (; •,'~'':`:' ~/~ ..:vlT !zR•r';L H~!w S'AEI.K- ;:P sTA MP/ ;'s ,rk'aCJ ".) :,: •i•~~ . 661'/11„ ' . ofc ACeTF i^At .. /{Y~ 4Vi ui.P3L /. 4NCMOIP'([t{F.OY OTl~R•jj:.~ gE 'Y ' ' `I L Q J+: R. cl~ JO T{I FFC °hGV i : ~~ : , % { ~ ' ~ dT CLIP'(! f w/,TLR fY'w' $ bJl B' C f~ T .. . ,_ ' ~ , .,f' ..NGF F-C(/' :vF!5 FMN OGO o 6{q T(? f/I ~ O.O' P 4'NpB.:• SNw:v aVT-.o v5 , T~+ t ' ~ ~~f / 1 I-YLPOIi .Mfi?SE :•{ .yfCf 1lgF~ ~ . . ` HF EfNGf ~"OLKiJT~' AJ~ ~EC2 SL'RK > ''. ~, '!I `~C PfIC1'L"AL4L'r TA~1f~.'( AJ [1tAETi ••{.:~ ~- p4/.,. - •nf Ff4C.01! !'M1' v rFOM'(g/ [C:VOI • ' ( ' M1C..Y)l~'. cQ~E Iw/ER MLreT SENCE IJM'Ai gY KIYOI~ ~ ` ' ~ + ~ .y~~. ~^ eco~cii2' v<Li.. r..ar! a i ra: ,re /Ari.W er cc woJ ~, ' ~~ T ' ~ r .. J, = ' +•C '', . • }: !. ; 4 :C _C_O_N__'T; . ~~oN.LNO A wGO[•f-Ait ti +Z'N U/ TN/CA',VfJJ ~'u,n`Ag ' CESCRMiION OF REVISION. " f~ M,V' ~a~ CITY ,OF RANCNp' ~Ct1CA ~N~A:'~, •- ' s,~.^._. PLA1'1 a ~~~'LO+ PRpFy~''~` ''",. '. ;..'•:'. .~ .`. r~'f: .[~'; 'fin i •rN!. M . ' '~. BASE LINp+~ FROM. S?A., i~ 00':T. ~~ R'~`p5',fip~ Q ST ~a AVPU0vC0 EY ~, _ - + D~JQ ~ ~ ~^ Clir ENGiuC[R'.~.__-_- ~_. ~'RC•E: M. . C(ti4N q ~ `w~.' iNltAq ~',Y P 5 1•K,tljl•'•ei't~ ±~~ \ R r . - .DO.' . t •. yr ~.. .. K 1 ~' .. r'.. . I. ., y,+ .WN. .'.eP TMCTM'!{p ~ tQJy~ r .~ ;,1.'. '.L. 'I'~'~..f' :{ V •.l `-:' ~~ •. ~~''~ ., .-......., ....._ .• v. Y.qK -.i~1:yKY~..SIY'r iN RemRdta ReouRmn gy City pf Rancho CnCMOnga wNUI RacoROao NNL To City o(Ranchq Cucamonga P.O. Bon BO] Rancho Curampnp. CA 91])0 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION. receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, 0.0BEAT A. LEES AND SWIRLEY A. LEEi, husband and wife as joint tenants EASEMENT • GRANT(S) to the City of Rancho Cucamonp, a Municipal Corporation, an EASEMENT far ROddNdy and related purposes in, aver and upon that rcrtain real properly in the Clty o(Ralseho Cuamonp, County o(San B:mardino, Sute of Caiifomu, Described as Follows: the South 21,00 feet of Me North 60.00 feet of the North one-half of [he West one-half of the Nest one-half of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, acmrdi ng to map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Bgok 4 of Maps, page 9, Records of San Bernardino County, D.taa yir.,,~i~ ~y~s- OENERAL ACMNOWLEOOM~NT EzM1Blr °B" grace Aeove TMIa uwe Roa aEmROegy au smle of 4d[LLfiLPnLn- on mn me ~~ aey onf J/~~CL/C.l, .19~J Oemra me. coumy of ~rrllL /17dC[~1~o}~ ~~(Q/-~.. /'_!_.l!C4~hi___-- In<undersigned xoury PUtlIK naao~anY avneare0 u Oenonany known to m< X prOred tome o' In! LMie of seliel<CIOry erideOt< 10 bRIM DRraonlel r.~nl'Sl.rlmq<I _t1H~ fxbacnbed to lNe OF'ICIAL SEAL wNMn~rolrumenLadaOAnowlRaped lhtl ~_aNCU1Rad JUnItN AAWaiA ' WITNESS myhmOmd Olhcul utl x0u5v rueuc ~ uUrolxll I HR VIAUIl01Rn O1Rn t ly vw a YR A 1 ~ r NOR a SlgnalON P / SXtE iE A GENEpAL ACRNOMLEOGEM Y ENT, P„F.AiE USE PROPER ACFNOMLEOCEMENt~ LE. PARTNERSXIPr aosEUUF sr~Er -- - - -~ novow,or fAJf :1NF.Vr -~- f i_ 1 ~P 9. ~E/ 1 1 \~~ (~ ~r J -! J i-~ / ~.Ftura.ec~ ~ e~,vr \ ~ co,UYO//J9 AR~ij l75 A~25AC / - 1 W' V L cir/ er' ~ A C ' L A. NA~NSCOii t ASSCCl APES. INC. - -_.. . yaw .unno~ mm auwuc um nwuca .pT./CNMlNT . Mtxl ~ls~ _ NICO MIIfO. NMI,N~I.., I~.IN~1». •~p• <~. tlM1 - 'TO _ -~ _I '3 E.Ci!!B/T B ~~. r1. -- s~nra,is,cro~ ua E x N I s t r ^L° 2/8/85 6NF APN 1077-061-09 estimate fpr Frnnta9e Improvements • Unit Yo. 't em puan ti ty Unit Price Amou nt Geve oo eT~ ..__. .. urL D a Guaer 21+85.9-20+22.4 i64 Lf. 6.00 E 984 .00 2. Sidewali lE4'x4' 656 s. f. 1.75 11x8 .00 3. Orivew ay Apron 9`A 9' :71 s. f. 2.50 427 .:0 4. Ranove Rail Fence a2 .. f. 50.00 $. RelOCdte Mall 30x I ed. iG.OG Developer's Portion Est. iot al 2559 - , j0 L_y 1. P.L. Pav rixnts 22.5x:40.5 3161 x.5 150 iddd~ 118.5 Sons 40.00 a741. 50 2. A.6. Pavements 3161 x. Js 134 [o0b 74 tons 10.00 743. 25 3. Subgr ode Prep 3161 and E zcavati on 3161 z I' - 27 117 c. y. 5.00 585. G0 4. Relocate Phone Poles by O[ners 5 ea. Y/L 5. Reloca t= Ftre Nydr an t" 1 ea. 750.00 150. 00 6. Relocate Meter 6 Lower Service Line* 7. ea, 150.00 300. 00 *PO$sl ble N/L relocation after pr ipr ri gbts determin ation 1. Ad3ust valve cover to grade est. 2 ea. 150.00 )00. 00 8. gelpcate water vault 6 LLNG valves l ea. 1000.00 1000. 00 9. 0.eno ve 3 trees 3 ea. 150.00 450. 00 10. Remove 5 stpmps 5 ea. 75.00 50. 00 11. qel pate traffic sign L ea. 50.00 50. GO City's Portion Est, Total E9292. 15 RESOLUTION NO. ~=.,-~-s"m A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING STREET FRONTAGE CONSTRUCTION REIMBURSEMENT BETWEEN R08ERT A. AND SHIRLEY A. LEES AND THE CITY OF R,4 NCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement executed by Robert A. and Shirley A. Lees, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as "Oev eloper"), for the installation of frontage improvements located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Turner Avenue; and WHEREAS, The Developer desires that the City construct said frontage improvements in conjunction with the City's project far the improvement of Base Line Road from Teak Way to Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, The Developer has executed an easement for roadway and realted purposes over safd frontage to be improved; and WHEREAS, The City is agreeable to have such improvements constructed as part of the above noted City project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the City Council of the City of • Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Reimbursement Agreement be hereby approved and authorize the Mayor to execute the same, and direct the City Clerk to record same in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authe et, City C erk jaa nimv n~ n n ern vn rrr *r~ n wanw~n n STAFF REPORT ° ~' ~? .~ zl' , 9 N~ Ti ~ f, A Z j i9i7 GATE: March 20, 1965 T0: City Coun cil and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Blane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJ. CT: Approval of Street Frontage Construction Reimbursemen t Agreement between Dolores Browne and the City of Rancho Cucamonga C~ The attached agreement between the City and Dolores Browne provides for the widening and improvement of Base line Road. The property owner has agreed to reimburse the City the cost of constructing new curb, gutter and sidewalk and a Grant of Roadway Easement to allow for the full widening of the street. These latter improvements are to be paid for by the City. A Construction Estimate, a copy of the Grant of Easement and a copy of the Plan showing the noted improvements are found as exhibits to the Agreement, The workings will be constructed as part of Capital Improvement Protect No. 800-84-D1, the Improvement of Base Line Road from Teak Way to Haven Avenue. RECC!'S~ENDATION It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Street Frontage Construction Reimbursement Agreement between Dolores Browne and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. R/es pectf ully ubmi Led, .~~ ,. ~~ LBH: :jaa Attachments RECORDING REDUESTED BY: and NNEN RE C00.DED NgIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY GF RANCHO LOOP MONGA P. 0. Bax GO] RANCHO CUC A>10'IGA, CALIFORNIA 91770 ST REEi FRONTgGE CONSTRUCTION REIMBU0.SENE NT gGREENENT THIS AGREEMENT, wade and entered into this day pf 1985, by and be [w een Col pre; Browne, Successor Truss ee of [he Editn E. Browne Trust, Trust Agreement dates duly 1], 1901 (hereinafter referred to as "0 eveloper"), and the LITY OF 0.ANCH0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred [o as "City"t, provides as follows: NNE 0.E AS, the 0¢vel oper desires that the City construct • said improvements in conjunction with City's project as described +n Exhibit "A" Plans for the :mDrovement of 9ase Line 0.oad from Teak Nay Lo Haven Avenue. NNERE AS, the Oevel oper desires to make Daym ent to City for costs of such improvements, as determined by the City; and NNERE AS, the City it agr ee ab to tp have such improvements completed as part of the above notetl City proj¢ct. NOM, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: I. The City will furnish a17 lobar, equipment an0 material, and pay all costs incident to the installation In accordance with plans and spec if ica[tpns approved by the [7ty E npineer of the City, for [he frontage Improvements described In Exhibit "C" Estimate for Frontage Improvements along the str¢¢t adjoining th¢ parcels of land described in Exhibit "B" Easement for Roadway dnd Related Purpates. 2. The installation pf saiC frontage Improvement shall be completed at [he ;amo time as the imprpv ements /gr the City's prpJ ect Improve Base line Road from Teak Nay to Haven Avenue. 0 1 3. OeveloDer hereby agrees to reimburse City an amount of 51,498.25 as aesc ri beE in Exhibit "L" att acned hereto. Said amounts are has ed upon an estiaate of cost. Oevel DDer shall pay to City the total amD Unt in ene installment due and payable within 30 days fray the date of the execution of this 4greement. 4. The OeyeloDer do25 by Chei2 presEn <s Conveys t0 the City, and Easement fcr DDadway anE 3el aced PurDDSes aver the properly deSC rihpd in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. • • 2 LY HITNESS 'NH ERE OF, the part<.es hereto have execute0 this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY DEVELOPER CITY OF AANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOLORES 30.0NNE, Successor CALIFORNIA, a municipal Trustee of the Edith E corporation Browneirus t, Trust Agree- ment dated July 10, 1981 B r ~ -'----~ - -~ `^-- don ^ Mikels Mayor ATTEST: w,: NAR 141905 n / ~~ everly A. Authe et D'~ Li [y Clark mcs c.':-'tr.A avxoia u aae~r~~r,xe.+..,r~...e~...«....»~~ra u...~aaa.a~eF ease u..a... STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS COUNTY OF SAN BERNAR DING) On ,19_,be tore • me Me uncle rs~gned Votary Pu Jlic, personally appeared JON D. M1R;L5 and BEVERLY A. AUTHELET personally known to me to be [he Mayor and City Cierk, respectively, of the C7TY OF AANCMO CUCAMONGA, CAL iFORNIA, a municipal corppr a[ion, and known to me to Je the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of sa+d m un iciDal corporation, and acknowledged [o me that such municipal corporation executed it. NITNESS MY HPND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. N ptary Sf gna[ure STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ( ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO! Aka~ //~ ~~~ day, of /r'rJ Yt!/l. ~9~ before / n.t ,s th me, =u~,f A- os - the un ersi 3ned Notary Pub is persana~ear etl p e5 SYOWYIE p erapne ly known [o me (X) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) /s subscribes to the within instrument and ack npwleged that~n ex eCUted it. NIiNESS MY HAND \f Y S _ ^r C P A lUC'Tw A AC~~ID J 9 ~~~111 N011.T OuCti~' < . C9.Y~a ~'~ /nj NVtr '~ / t O ~ ~ - . ~ j son eentuvonw v. y ' )' M„om~"P^i MR°D' Notary Signature NOTE: NHEN DOCUMENT IS EKECUTEO BY A ONPORATION ON PANT NENSNIP, THE ABOVE ACKNONLE O6EMENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CON PORATION/PANT NEAIHTO-FfRFaGLE06ENEXT IS NEQUINEO. ExHfelr ^g^ pawpolNa pEWE3}E! ar City of Rancho Cucamonga wxEN nEwnogo wuL To City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. BoR g07 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91770 • RACE 4lOVE TNII LINE fnp pEwn>EA VH EASEMENT FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION. receipt of which if h<rehy acknowledged, Ool r vn - GRANT(S) In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal COTDO!]llOn, an EASEMENT for Roa Jxay and related purposes m, ovn and upon that certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. County of San Bernvdino, State o! California, Described u Follows: ':SEE ATTACHMENT • DEed 3~n ~ 8 S 1'1~a„~ GENERAL ACKNOWLE 6MENT 51aeo1 /IVY !4. On mis me (/*av of /!/G rGA'1__ ts ~'SAtloro me. s3. cgemy gl~n/~?rnu rallrro { ~" ~I ~7' ~(,((t-./L~ _/'r~±~0_S f~._ - , me uneeu,gnlo Nola~y Puol,c. olrzonnlY aooearee ~o%res fj_roelne , OfFIQAL SEAL Oenonalry Fnnwn lame JUD~TN 4ACr:5Ta S rorAgr pvet~..en;~rgamA ~~ I unrnvee to me Un lne Laa,aal salislaclpry enrlence la lw the gerfanlfl wnofe namNal r3 waa<nMdl XY OIPAAf]IAA rAl^PT `~ erl lllal eAe W~m~n nfV and acknoWlle minl !a ecube Ml u^ert up~m NPM 19K , g U . WITNESS my Aaed and oll¢,al teal, ~ 4 _ N a al~gnware / ~/ TN[5 1E d GENEPAL ACRNONLF,GLI.YF.`1T. PLEASE OiE PPOpEP aCRNOHLECGEMENT, LL. PRPTNEpSNt P. EASEMENT • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 2, Section 2, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, records of San 9e rna rdino County, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Lot 2; THENCE North 89'57'55" West along the North line of Said Lot 2 a distance of 549.98 feet; THENCE South 00'10'15" East 33.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE coctinuing South 00'10'15" East a distance of 372.00 feet; THENCE North 89-57'54" West a distance of 10.00 feet; THENCE North 00=10'15" West a distance of 321.09 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 24.00 feet; THENCE along said curve to the left through a central angle of 89'47'40" • an arc length of 37.61 feet to a point on a line parallel to and 60.00 feet distant, measured at right angles, South of the side North of said Lot 2; THENCE along said line North 89'57'55" 'West a distance of 77.64 feet to the West line of said Lot 2; THENCE North 00'11'22" West along said West iine a distance of 27.00 feet to a point on a line parallel to and 33,00 feet distant, ;nea su red at right angles, South of the said North line of said Lot 2; THENCE along said line South 89°57'55" East a distance of 111.56 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. BASEL/~/E ST.PEET ..e~s?K~ EA rfMfNT / z 9 3 - ,W PEPFt~~P h ~ A ST.PEET Ifio Ic ~ I 'n zz z® a~ Iw I i ze z~ SC4GE /~/00~ -y ~ ~J I J-,~ CO.!/rA/NS 65465 SF /J/t FC, • C/TV OF l A 4AINSCOii 6 ASSOCI AiES. INC. •...........-... [uo [wrndn gnu dau[[e[ [rwo n...w -~ -A7TACHMF•S? ~- .Nrwnar n.oo [xaw [awin°~wii ii"b i°0•v~i°"". e[. u'o[ • ~V - -fX B T ~ - ' /~ ele /~/LYJ~ G/O E% H I B I T 'C' 2/26/85 BNF APN 10]]-071-01 Estimate for Fro nt ape '^prpvenents Onlt No. Item 'lu anti "n't A unt 1. Sidewalk 734 s.f. 51.75 51,204.50 2. Curh 6 Gutt¢r 7),E4 L f. 6.00 465.55 PRCPER!Y OWNER PO RT:CN $1, ]SC. 36 3. Spandrel 357.5) s.f. 2.'.0 fi94, 6B 4. Pavements A.C. 95.]5 cons 30.C0 2,fiJ 3.40 A.6. 64.07 tons 15.00 961.05 5. Exc ovation 123.67 c.y. 3.00 371.00 6. Remove Trees 2 ea. 150.00 300.00 ). Telephone Pole 6 Anchors N/C ryyC (by others) TOTAL CITY 45,400.13 SPECIAL NOTE: Previously I punted 51,498.25 tp Nr s. Brawn for sidewalk and curb 6 gutter. I have stated to her that since she is aillfng to expedite the payback that I will hold to the origin al pu ottJio n. • 91 one 8. ran ds eF n Sem pr [j vil Engineer • RESOLUi ION N0. f93-29~-29R~ ~ % ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING STREET FRONTAGE CONSTRUCTION REIMBURSEMENT BETWEEN DOLORES BROWNE AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCRMONGA WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement executed by Dolores Browne (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"), for the installation of frontage improvements located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Turner Avenue; and 'WHEREAS, The Developer desires that the City construct said frontage improvements in conjunction with the City's project for the improvement of Base Line Road from Teak Way to Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, The Developer has executed an easement for roadwa~~ and realted purposes over said frontage to be improved; and WHEREAS, The City is agreeable to have such improvements constructed as part of the above noted City project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Reimbursement Agreement be hereby • approved and authorize the Mayor to execute the same, and direct the City Clerk to record same in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa CITY OF RANCHO CliCA;v10NGA `o~~cwMO.yr STAFF REPORT ~~~~, \,, s , ~- t~~ i= T Q IS Ci I~Z 19i GATE: March 20, 1985 T0; City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubb s, City Engineer gy; Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer 5U6~E CT: Approval of the final expenditure of 5100,447.95 for ?he Hellman Avenue from 6th Street to 656 feet north Reconstruction Project, accept Lhe improvements as complete and authorize the Finance Director to make the appropriate transfer of additional funds from Gax Tax or Systems Development Revenue Source The subject project has now been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. However, additional work was required to complete the project as follows: During the reconstruction of Hellman Avenue from 6th Street to 656 feet north, • after the broken-up old concrete surface was removed, it was found that the subgrade below the proposed new structural section was super-statur at ed, yielding and unstable. With pending rain, it was necessary to resolve the problem as soon as possible. It was not feasible to allow the 9r ade to air dry or to add a drying agent. After conferring with the project soils engineer, a portion of the unstable material was removed and an unprocessed rock bed was constructed with a soil stabl iz ing fabric followed by a layer of processed rock base material. The above proved to be the most expedient, successful treatment eliminating the risk of further damage and cost. The additional cost of the above work exceeded the original amount authorized by $16,391.03 or 19.5%. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the final expenditure of _ $100,447.95 for the Hellman Avenue from 6th Street to 656 feet north Reconstruction Project, accept the improvements as complete and authorize the Finance Director to transfer additional funds from Gas Tax or Systems Development revenue source. ft espectf idly submitted, i ~~~r ~~~~ LBH: MP;jaa~/ _i CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA ~~ca,HOti STAFF REPORT 2i `9 ~fG z _ 'a GATE: March 20, 1985 19'~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 9. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Richard Cot a, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Contract Change Order Ne. 1 for Engineering Design Services on the Base Line Road Improvements from Teak Way to Haven Avenue Additional engineering design services for Base Line Road Improvements between Teak Way and Haven Avenue are required and shall consist of: 1) Sidewalk design at the northwest and southwest corners of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. 2) Street widening design of Turner Avenue south of Base Line Road. • 3) Redesign street improvements on the south side of Base Line Road between Cambridge and Turner Avenue to the ultimate street width (with special consideration for the existing house at the southwest corner of Turner Avenue and Base Line Road). 4) Ezp and the improvement plans and specifications to incorporate the traffic signal design for Turner Avenue and Base Line Road prepared by others. These design services are in addition to the original design agreement awarded to L. A. Wainscott and Associates, Inc. of Grand Terrace, California on October 3, 1984. This contract change order increases the original contract price 6y $7,300.00. The contract fee, therefore, will increase from $18,180.00 to $25,480.00 and will be paid by Gas Tax and Systems Development Funds. RECONI£NDATION _ It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Contract Change Order No. 1 for the additional engineering design services by L. A. Wainscott for the additional fee of $7,300.00 plus 10% for contingencies. Res c fully mite , i L H: C• Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CONTRACT FOR Rehabilitation of Base Line Road between Orde• .~ Teak Way and Haven Avenue. Mar,. 20, 1985 _ Date: T0: L. A ~~'a ~n~cott Inc. 22400 Barton Road, Ste 200 , Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Engineer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engi neering services. DES CR I?TI OIJ OF CHANGES DECREASE INCREASE in Contract Price In Contract Price 1. Additional Field Survey $2,000.00 2. Additional Otility Research & Coordination $ 300.00 3. Pavement Evaluation & Design $ 450.00 4. Construction Plans E4, 200.00 5. Right of Way Legal Description $ 350.00 TOTAL $1,300.00 J~STIF ICAT[ON To expand the agreement scope of work for ultimate street design far Base Line Road as outlined on the attached letter from L. A. Wainscott dated December 27, 19II4. The amount of the Contract will be Increased by the sum of: Seven Thousand and Three Hundred Dollars 00.0 The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: Twent -Five Thousand and Four Hundred Eighty Dollars ($ 25,480. 0 The Contract period provided for completion will be Increased 120 Calendar Days This document will become a~upplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. ~ ////~ Requested:' `ji (~'> ~i ~~.~ ~~ ogdn c u~bb~s, City Engineer Date Accepted: ~/,{. // ~ ~i~ ~~ ~4'~BS Engineer Oate Approved: _ Mayor, City of Rancho ucamonga Date agreement dated: October 3, 1984 • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 20, 1985 T0: City Manager - City Council FROM: Jerry R. Grant, Building Official ~r/y~-~- SL'BJECT: EXTENSION OF TIME - RGREEMENT FOR iNSTRLL AT ION CF DRAINAGE FACILITIES - KINDER CARE L BACKGROUND: .~ GUCy x~~ ~\Y <I \lY Y' f ~~ r.i ~~~~ iii z F' ~ Z 19.. ~ In September of last year Kinder Care entered into an agreement with the city to construct certain drainage facilities on or before March 5th 1985. The purpose of the agreement was facilitate occupancy of their huild ing pending design of a drainage system made necessary by failure of the developer to coordinate construction of Foothill Blvd. drainage structures between Cal-Trans and the city. Rs a result water was taken from the State Highway onto pr+vate properties and created a significant hazard to adjacent properties. II. ANALYSIS: Work has started on the project but is not yet completed. Granting of the extension would allow completion of the pro sect and subsequent elimination of the flooding danger without delay. II1. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that an extension of Lime he qr anted to July 5, 1985, conditional upon submittal of revised setter of credit in form and content satisfactory to the city attorney. ~,i CIGaJpt^ \~~9 ~' ~> _ ~~~:_ ,~_ ~ x • F_ r~ "2 19" March 13, 1985 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Moyo, J011 D. aUk Phi Co•,vil,w•nMn fharle. J. nuquet 11 Jefhey Kin¢ Richard ?1. Dahl Pamela J. R'nKht Mr. Robert 8. Blumenthal AttornAy at !aw The Boston Inn 3890 Tenth St. Riverside CA 92501 SUBJEC, T: TIME EXTENSION FOR COMPLETION CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE FACILITIES - KINDER CARE, RANCHO CUCAMONGR We are in receipt of copies of your letter to Idr. Dougherty and his response concern'ng the above subject. Since the issue relates most directly to the Building and Safety Division functions, ole ase direct future correspondence to this office. • Consistent with your request, i have scheduled this matter for City rouncil consideration at their meeting of March 20, i feel ob l;ped, however, to address the implication in your letter that the city ha; delayed the oroiect. Our records indicate that plans for the project were in the plan checking process a total of 47 days, commencing with the original submittal and continuing through 3 revisions. On the other hand, plans were in the possession of the design engineer or awaiting action from the applicant for a total of 93 days (including periods of 35 and 47 Aays) before approved plans were finally picked up 6y the contractor. Contrary to the claim of delay, plans were assigned special priority and attention in order to expedite the checking. Proceeding through 4 checks would normally take about 50% longer than actually elapsed in your case. For these reasons I do not consider that the city was the cause of any "delay". Insofar as your differences with adjacent property owners, an earlier effort to achieve permission from the affected property owners would have averted several hours of explanations and responses on our Dart as to what was occurring, People seemed to find it difficult to understand that the city ;s limited in its ability to impose solutions to problems between individuals. We are yet to receive any Spec if is Conformation that willing access to the adjacent properties has been acquired. Notwithstanding the requirement of the agreement requiring prompt notification to the city of any experienced delay I am recommending that the City Council grant your request in the interests of resolving the drainage problem and showing a spirit of cooperation. It is presumed that the letter of credit would be modified accordingly. I = t^ 9820 BASELME ROAD, SUITEC • P05T OFFICE BOX 907 • RANC WO CL'f A1f0\G,1. CA hIFORtiIA 41780 OIJ1999~1951 Mr. Robert 8. Blumenthal • March 13, 1985 Page 2 I trust this provides you with the information requested. You will receive notification of the city councils action suuse quent to the March 20th meeting. Sincerely, COMMl1N ITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Building and Safety Division ~2 Lc ~~~lCc~r ~ ~rry ;rant JRG:11 cc:City Manager Community Development Director Ernie Courter Phil Brown Robert Dougherty r1 LJ r~ U i~l • L COVIN GTON 6 CROWE I,TiO RN E V 4 hT LPw IIJI W[ST Si%T.. STR EE' RO ST O«,CL BO% i5i4 ONT~RI~~ Or~~.i~09 NIM1 Bi162 February 27, 1965 Mr. Robert B. Blumen t:^.sl A tto:mw at .. ~. The Boston Inns 3890 Test t:t street Riverside, California 92501 Re: Kinder Care - Rancho Cucac.o nag • Dear Mr. Blumenthal: Receipt of your letter of February 20, 1985 is acknowledged. Your request for an extens io r, should be brought before the City Cou.^.cil fo: consideration. We are sure that tF.e City Manager will cause the request to he placed on the City Council age r,da, and I ask that you coordinate directly tai tit him for the hearing date. Very truly yours, COV I:;GTCN 6 CROi]E, ~~ = _ _ BOWERY E. DOCG[yERT~ City Attorney for the City of Rancho Cucamonga RED:sjo ec; Laaren :4, tvasserma.^., City Manager cr. Lloyd 6. Hubbs, City Engineer cc: Jerry R. Grant, Building Official l4W Of PiCEi RC3E RT 0. BLU~U E>:TH AL u February 20, 1905 THE BOSTO\' I\VS JB 90 '[M~ • [CT Rrv ER510 E, CA UFO RV IA 9250 n.., ee..o aeo .~~sE ~A .o Rohe rt Dougherty Covinyton & Crowe 1131 West 6th Street Suite 300 Ontario, Calif o[nia 91762 Re: Rieder Care - Rancho Cucar.,onga Dear Bob: As you will recall, this office represents Ri nder Care in regard to the construction of its Rancho Cucamonga facility. On or about September 5, 1984 Kinder .^a re artd the City of Rancho • Cucamonga entered into that certain Agreement which provided for the construction and c.~.lpl etion of certain works of improvement, Said improvements are to be completed within six (6) months from the date of the Agreement unless Kinder Care is delayed by ...default of the CITY or its employ ees...or such other cause completely beyond the control of OWNER...." In the event of such delay, the time for completion shall be extended for an equivalent period. Please be advised that the City did not approve the plans for the improvements until January 23, 1985. Further, since the final approved plans involve the utilization of adjoining land, differences have to be resolved with the adjacent property owners affected by the project, The construction, although now more than fifty percent (508) complete, is presently at a standstill pending the resolution of the aforementioned diff ecences with Herbert Hawkins and tAi chael J's. We believe all problems are minor in nature and shall be resolved in tF.e very near future. Predicated upon the foregoing, it is necessary that the City grant ar, extension of time in order to complete the construction. Please accept this letter as a written application by Kinder Care for such extension. We believe an extension of one hundred and twenty (120) days is appropriate. The letter of credit from First Interstate will be appropriately modified so as to conform to the extension. Please advise if the City requires a more formal application for • extension. For purpose of notice, I am sending a copy of this letter to Lauren Wasserman, City tda na ge r, and Jerry Grant, City Building Official; however, I am relying on you to advise if ancther procedure is required and whether the extension is to be granted. Assuming the extension is granted, I propose a simple amendment to the Agreement providing for the extension of time. P7 ease contact me after your review of this letter. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Yours very truly, ROBERT B. BLUMENTH AL A Professional Law Corporation ~~~~__ By. Robert B. Blumenthal ~` RBB:fmh cc: Lauren Wasserman Jerry Grant Ernie Co ur ter Phil Brown Sam Kaufman u • AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TH ZS AGREEMENT is made this 5th day of Septerbe*_ , 1984 by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and, KINDER-CARE LEAR IN ING CENTERS INC., whose Home Office business address is 4505 executive Park Drive, Montgomery, Alabama 36103, and whose Regional Office business address is 160 Newport Center, Suite 220, Newport Beach, Cal if ocnia 92660, hereinafter referred to as "OWNER"; WHEREAS, OWNER has made application to the CITY for an Occupancy Permit; and, WHEREAS, the OWNER has not completed all of the work, or made all of the offsite improvements required by the CITY to obtain said Occupancy Permit, and desires to enter into a contract for the completion of the work and the construction of the improvements, and to furnish security for the performance of said contract; NOW, THEREFORE, in conside zation of the Grant of a Temporary Occupancy Permit by said CITY, the OP7NER hereby warrants and agrees at its own expense to do all of the work and make all of the improvements required with respect to certain drainage facilities, which work and improvements, without limitation, consist of the • upgrade of existing drainage facilities to accept runoff from Foothill Boulevard, as more fully set forth in the attached general description prepared by OWNER'S Engineers and which description is incorporated herein by reference as though set forth in full. The above description of work is unde cstood to be only a general designation of the work and improvements, and not a binding descriptior. thereof, and all of said work shall be done and i^~.rovements made and completed as are shown on and in strict compliance with applicable plans and specifications, and any subsequent alterations thereto. Such work shall be completed and improvements made within ai:• months from the date of this agreement, unless such time be extender b}'`he L:'."Y upon written application of the OWNER. The making of an application for an extension of time by the OWNER shall, upon the granting of the application by the CITY, constitute a waiver by the OWNER of all defenses of laches, estoppel, and other limitations of action in any action or proceeding filed by the CITY. If OWNER is delayed in the performance of the work contemplated by this contract by any act, neglect, or default of the CITY oc its employees, or by fire, lightning, earthquake, cyclone or such other cause completely beyond the control of OWNER, then the time for completion of the project shall be extended for a period equivalent to the time lost by reason of any of the aforesaid causes. The OWNER shall not, however, be entitled to an extension for any such delay unless the OWNER gives the CITY prompt, written notice of the commencement of such delay. M extension of time for completing the work contemplated shall be the OWNER'S sole remedy for any and all claims the OWNER might have on account of such delay. The OWNER further agrees that any and all work done or to be done in conjunction with the construction of the improvements shall conform to the requirements of the Rancho Cucamo rga Municipal Code and any other applicable ordinances regulating such drainage facilities and shall be completed within the period of time described above. The OI9NER pc om ises and agrees to maintain all of the improvements to be constructed under this contract in a state of good repair, until all of the work and improvements are completed and accepted by or on behalf of the CITY oc other governmental body and until the security for the performance of this agreement is released. If the OWNER fails to install all or any part of the improvements required by this contract within the time set forth herein, or fails to comply with any other obligation contained herein, it shall be liable to the CITY for any administrative expenses and attorney's fees incurred in obtaining compliance with this agreement and any such expenses and fees incurred in processing any action for damages or for any other remedies permitted by law. • It is further understood and agreed that upon default of any obligation hereunder, and at any time after any such default, the CITY may make written demand upon the OWNER to immediately [emedy the default or complete the work. If said remedial activities or completion of work are not commenced within seven days after such demand is made and are not thereafter diligently prosecuted to completion and fully completed within thirty days after the making of such demand (or such other time as may be contained in said demand), the CITY may then complete or arrange for completion of all remaining work or conduct such remedial activity as in the sole judgment of the CZTY may be required, all at the full expense and obligation of the OWNER. In the event the CITY elects to complete or arrange for completion of remaining work and improvements, the Public Works Director, upon such election, may req uir% all work by the OWNER to cease in order to permit adequate coordination by the CITY for completing any remaining work and improvements not yet completed. It is agreed that all work and improvements done pursuant to this agreement shall conform to the standards, engineering plans and specifications applicable at the time work is actually commenced, For purposes of enforcing this agreement, the term "CITY" • includes the City Council, the City Manager, the City Attorney, . Public Works Director, or any of them, or any of their authorized representatives. It is further agreed that the amount of security for the performance of this contract is thirty-seven thousand nine hundred dollars ($37,9;10,00), Same being pursuant to the attached irrevocable letter of credit drawn on the First Interstate Dank cf California. It is agreed, in the event of a breach of this contract by OWNER, and the CITY elects not to complete or arrange for completion of remaining work and improvements, it would be impracticable or extremely difficult to fix the actual damages resulting from the breach and, therefore OWNER agrees to pay to CITY, as liquidated damages and not as a penalty, the sum of $37,900, which sum represents a reasonable endeavor by the parties hereto tc estimate a f aic compensation for the foreseeable losses that might result from a breach by OWNER. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the OWNER has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officer the day and year first above here written. RINDER-CARE LEARNING CENTERS, INC. • Dy. ~e ~ Approved as to Description 4cee ocio€-~PSb};e-WOCke Building Official City of Rancho Cucamonga CITY OF RA~CI10 CUCAMOM GA BY: ~w ~ ;c„~. .. v, City Manager / i C~ ACn'+O NLEOC3MENT •a mz ,:`.?.?rtJ.dcTP%/Gi: ~/%/.e/- r ~.:`~c.. _~~~~~IrJ/rl(l''i/!~~~r ~.±.iA . `.r~ `-ewi!~il{~~--J' Ontni~s l'nle~n~oay of ~~¢'~77b P/"' _ 19~y.. Delon me. :C ,~.'_ r~~r(/ILjlC/rl!fL. ~ S5. tL1N~L. C.___~~~/._~C~S .~ INe untlersignetl Notary Public, personally appeare0 i, ~ ~ orrra~`i::r~~~ 2,, ~ _~..a ~'rRt.e ~c u~~e~------- pe Onally known to me ' prov¢o fo me on the basis of SaliSlaclory entlenoe to De the person151 wno eaecuteo 1 ne witNn instrument as ~cpeS><C1ic_21C61 or on Denalf of ine corporation Iherem nametl, and acknowleog o tome that Ine corporation eaeculeo tl. WITNESS my nano ano oll¢ial seal. Iary's Sig nalu re ~" ._ ., ~ ~___ r-n_ " ~~/~- ~~n.noeu mr.nv+ .non •iwn vmmn eiw •oo eoe ussa ~mn.xe unx+ ~::Cr: ^-~arrv E:rngev, =,r:ance "vi••eccn.- SUE: cC:: 'ere~nn..= qd!n gn,erit Purrnase it is recommer:Ced chat cSe Citv's g~_rrr_hase of r~ew dnor:e ec:aiomer:t from 177 be fr^~:rn the bu.d geted c~~r:t ingenev f_m the c!irr•ent fiscal vaar. 'I'ne amount red aired a f7N, 00N. This necessaac es a tr^ansfer from the cr_:nt ingencv t; the Capital Account of tie City Facil a xes Uedartment. PURPOSE: • Ev sec ur in^ the m.u•cnase wan the available eca:t irmencv f:,~nds, the City tloes r:r:t ur:necessari~v reooard ue avai lao le reso:.rrces for the 199:.-9E Hudoet. 'f',ls gr!~cess will also: nntligate the effects of full term interest and al Lnw the City to save several thousand dollars by rnak inq an early ^avoff on this Dart icular ourchase. Revrew .:.f the terms of the agreement will 6e made, and oavoff of the ^!rrchase wtll be made as soon as 1t is feasible tr, tlo sc.. n•mv nn o w ernvn nrrn a i~rnrn • -'-- -- ---~---- - 2~L~......,,7yC9 STAFF REPORT ,~ ,~ > ~ ~~!? =_~ I^ DAiE: March 20, 1935 X9'7 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kroll, Engineer Technician SD6,1'c CT: intent to Annex tract Nos. 12362, 12621, 12091, 11781, 11625, 12525, 12740, 12741 and 12772-1 an Annexation No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Tract Nos. 12621, 12772-1, 12525, 12739, 12740 and 12741 and Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and setting the public hearing for said annexations on April 17, 1985 The attached resolutions set the public hearing to annex the above described tracts to the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. The Engineer's Report for both Districts is also attached for preliminary approval. the following are projects to be annexed: District No. 1 District Na. 2 (arterial) (local lights) Tract 12362 Tract 12621 12621 12772-1 12091 12525 11781 12739 11625 12140 12525 12141 12739 12740 12741 12772-1 +/ NEC'OMlENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions setting the date of public hearing for April 17, 1985, and giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report. Re ec tful y s mitted, L o! Attachments ~- ~~~ ^.^ SPIRIT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY January 14, 1985 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI40NGA 9320 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, CR 91730 Re: Oeer Creek Village Notice of Intention to 122 Single Family Homes Join Landscape and Tentative Tract Nos. 12525 Lighting Oist rictS 12739 12740 12741 Gentlemen: On behalf of the Deer Creek Village Homeowners Association for the above subject tentative tracts, we would like to joint the City-wide landscape and lighting districts of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We understand that the City will not maintain the landscape areas along the Decimeter streets - namely Center, 26th and Arrow Route and will therefore be the responsibility of the Deer Creek Viliage Homeowners • Association. Yours truly, DEER CREEK PARTNERS By: W. S. Going, Inc. A General Partner By ; i i W nn 5. Going, Jr. President JVB cc: Ms. Ditas Esperanza Fuscoe, Williams, Lindgren & Short 145 WEST MAIN STREET TUSTIN. CALfFORNIA 92680 7141731-7900 ~~ iA.S En~ineer:n¢ De part.rent City of Rancho Oa camongn 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonca, C:1 91730 RE: TR:\C; 12091 Port beast Corner of Groce and 9th .)a nuarc 3, 1985 Ge nt len:e n, Please accept this letter as formal request to form and/or join the appropriate Landscape and Lighting District as required per condition P-3 of the conditions of approval of tract L2091. Should you require any further in formation or have any questions, please contact Steve Wheatley a[ SCephen Daniels Commercial Brokerage, Inc., 980-6868. Thank you. .~a ~~ ~ ~~' ~ ~~~ j j~ ~~ ~. n .w CIiY OF RANCHO CUCF!.10iiO.\ E:GIAEER~!IG D:YIS10'~ Sincerely, • LJ ri ~CL Dominic Salvati, Applicant • Roy E. ®aly Construction Corporation ~ ~~ p~ December 11, 1984 Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs, Daly Construction Corporation respectfully requests the annexation of Tracts 11625 and 11781 into the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District. • If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call at (714) 987-3024. S' cere ly ar onnerton Project Manager DC/mm canfornia orrice p1 a) 9a7•ao2a 9310 Baseline • Suite 102 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 J/';~~, BOYER ENGINEERING CO. February 7, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamcnga ' Community Development Department p. 0. ecx NOi Rancho Cucamonga, California 9173C Att e:,tion: 2arbara Kra11 Ae: Tract No. 12772-1 Gentlemen: On behalf of our client, Morris and Searles, we hereby request permission to join the City-Wide Street Lighting and Maintenance Cisizict for the above referenced Tract. t/V{~~Jtruly /yyo urns ,/./~ Dave Gillette DG:m36 cc: ?lozris 6 Searles • C 2950 AIRWAY AVENUE, B-2 • COSTA MESA, CA 92626 (714) 966.0808 RieGwuud Development Co. - 26S \'o. San 6abrlel Bfad. 1'arndena, Callfornfa 9IY07 January 22, 19tli Barbara Krall City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department 9326 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear f1s. Kr all: We request that our condominium project on file southwest cornec of Arrow and Pladrone, Tt act 12621 he moved into tha crty's Landscape/Lig hung Diste is t. We will provide what ever is needed to join Tract 12621 into the Dist: is t. • Very truly your _ ~' ~ / /7 j /~. seoE~ Tutc' sT:mt Rov E. Dalv Construction Coraoration December 11, 1984 Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Of.`ice Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs, Daly Construction Corporation respectfully requests the annexation of Tracts 11625 and 11781 into the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call at (714) 987-8024. 5' care l~ ar onneYton Project Manager DC/mm California OMice (714) 987-8024 9310 Baseline • Suite 102 • RenchoCucamonge, CA 91730 ~,: .tr~ . ~~<. r.r 'ay;;~:'. Decemher 1, 1963 Mr. Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer City Of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Re: Tentative Tract 412362 Dear Mr. Hubbs: We are the developers of Tentative Tract 812362 consisting • of 22 buildings totaling 88 units on approximately 6.5 acres located on the southwest corner of Hellman and Baseline Rd. in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, We agree to have the tract included in the "Special Assessment District" for landscape and the "Special Assessment District" for lighting, as provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Sincerorely, J6e Carman Project Manager •7333EiELLM.4.A~1~8.. R~1NCFiOCI'G'u~lOVG:1.C:AL[inRXi,\91730 . (714)989-1725• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Engineer's Report for Street lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 3 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description this City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has de to^mined ±hat the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided far with the assessments established 6y the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on • arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cast shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Soecifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subfect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the su b,ject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 • (including Annexation No. 9 comprised of 746 lots and 188 9500E st~•eet lights and/or 115 SSOOL lights) is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* Quantity Rate** 9500E 188 9.90 5800E 115 8.75 *N igh Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamps Rate Mo's Totai 188 X 9.90 % 12 = $22,334.40 115 % 3.75 X 12 = $12,075.00 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost = 34,409.40 = 5.86/year/unit No. of Units in District 5874 5.86 divided by 12 = 0.49/mo./unit • Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagr am Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", Annexation No. 9. These diagrams are hereby incorporated Within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for the District are fcund to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than ane dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall he annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of Cfty Engineer's • Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex to District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to farm a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in 4ay, the Lity Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. • u EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. * of Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Tract No. of Lots/Units Street Light 5800E 9500E 12362 88 Condos 2 0 12621 90 T.H. 0 3 12091 246 Condos 0 2 11781 76 Condos 3 0 11625 102 Con das 0 5 12525 12739 12740 122 S.F. 0 9 12741 12772-1 20 S.F. 0 1 • • J RESOLUTION N0. -E@3'-~9~kfR A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCRMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEYJ~TION N0. 9 TD STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on March 20, 1985, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required 6y the Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Aci, which report bas been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should he modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized casts and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: that the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descrihed in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received 6y said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is herehy preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for t e purposes of aii subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. RESOLUTION N0. -f63=2B=Y3R ~ -' ' • A RESOLUTION OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING iTS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING h1AINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 9 TO STREET LIGHTING MJ~INTE NANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE [T RESOLVED 6y the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed mainten ante district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any Lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. • SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located within roadway right-of-way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 9 Co Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1". SECTION 3. Descri Lion of Assessment District: That the conternplat ed work, in the opinion of said City Counci s of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for X11 particulars for the amount and ® extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be • collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with Che City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SE CT IOtI 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on April ~ at t e hour pm in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not he done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li htin Act of 1972: All the work herein proposed shall a one an carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. • SECTION 8. Publication of Resolutf on of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6 o the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario, Ca i ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. RYES: NOES: 485ENT: ATTEST: ever y A. Authe et, ty er Jaa on ~ikels, Mayor • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 • ACJNEXATION NO. S ~~ ~ I a ~~ I i r ~ ~ r--; ` - y I '~~: ~ij - ~ ~ ~'"~/ ~ I t _ ~. , m 949. ns " j ll ~rr+s ~ !. sgnz f ' • I ~ J \ ~ AcB ..re: /iNay ~ ~ • I ", V , / f ll" ~:~ ii ~ ~ / ~ _ I r ! __ " ~ ~ ., I I~- ~~ _~ .. - . r ~ - ~ ~-~._ ~~~- .mil-_. _. °-"' ~`5j0t^ CITY OF RANCHO CUC >~r' "~ AMONGA w _ ~~ = COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ \ .~.;~, =' "= STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~' = N ~: lrn __ LLOYD RU995. CITY ENGI'd-=R R^E 238?9 04TE Utlc; page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 . ANNEXATION N0. S --- _- _ . { ,-" ~ !' ., ~ ~- i ~~A ~~* ~ ~ ~ i .I~ a ~~,r, ~`~~~ _~ c ~ q ~' > ;~j ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~„ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~l~~~ ~ n:~'e, F.,_ ~ ~ j ~~` - `,,III is ; `~00-` "`"'O~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1t1e~ ~' *'' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR• ~~ ~ .Z STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ T V i ~ i j lv un LlOYD HU9BS, CITY ENG~N_ER RCE 23?99 OGTE page _-_ ('. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. S r _ __ __ -- r ; ctt_t Nn Q---- °' ~-'-~--.-•- ~ -- a~ I l~~ ® ,~~ ~ © J ;I'~' ~~~ ; t-~~~,r;~ _.~ ~ : ,~.V,~ _.. ~~ - ., ~ '• __ t fI ~~ I ,i~ , I err "~ ii .~ .~..~r , i 'a.`i. r Y ~ ~ `~ ® `/' •'^ )i '.A '-+ ~ z V~~ iT rm ~.aa z vr~ xANCHO CUCAMONGA title COUNTY OF 3AN BERNARDINO ~ 2~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA - _OYD HUB85, CITY ENG~~==R R ^E 23989 04TE ~ page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 • APJNEXATION NUJ. ~ >- :i~:._ •~_ti.--~; ~J C ~~ ~ ~I_~S ~ ,fit ?~ y 0 _ ~-_., ~ , j~ \ 1 _y _. \~ . ~' .. ~~n "'~y:.~c ~ ~~~~_. ~- ~ ~Na ~ ~`~ ~. l.L~ / f~ ~~-• AYH. ~ l.F~_JI { l` ~ ~ ~ ~ 1, I ~ i ~ ~ ter ia~ ~ JJ ~ i_.L~~l~ ~ ~ I ~ - ~ ~~ ~~~ ~,Y~ l ~,- 51RFET ~`: e ~.,~ ~I--o. - --._ ~ ,. 1A, - .. , - ._-_-____ 191 __. _-_ STREET __ ~< QN I S I •I `~~`" title; ;,yam - ! TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _' ,:-. •• ~> COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO IB.._ rc~i:. ~ r ~~~" ~_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA - ~~~ ~> LLOYO MU98S, CITY ENG;N==R RCE 23989 D4TE ~ PaRe ANNEXATION NO. S ASSESSMEiJT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ,r1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 . ACJNEXATION NO. S ~ ~,o~"~!?) ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA "ale' 'y '" COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ^ SB. {Y. Y.: G~ ~l~ `w - _~ ~' °Z STATE OF CALIFORNIA „~ 6 ~> 19n i i nvn Nuaac r:rr cur.:nr_.a arc ~aecn Wert page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 1 SECTION 1. Auth ority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California jL andscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance determined that the street lights to all lots within said tracts as well street lights. annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit District No. 2. The City Council has be maintained will have an effect upon as on the lots directly abutting the Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on • local residential streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general 6enef it to all areas in the District and cost shat: be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will he constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 S (including Annexation No. * comprised of 1 lots and 232 street lights) is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* Quantity Rate** 5800E 45 8,75 *Hi gh Pressure Sodium Vapor **S CE Schedule LS-1. All night service per map per month, effective January 1, 1983. Lamps Rate Mo's Total 433 X 8.75 X 12 = $45,465.00 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: 28.01 Total Annual Maintenance Cost = 45,465 =28.01/year/unit No. o Um is in District 1623 28.00 divided by 12 = 4.22/mo./unit • Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", Annexation No. 7. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for the District are found to be of general henefit to all dweiliny units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings, 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's • Report. • 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. • `. EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 7 of Street • Lighting Maintenance District 2: Tract No. of Lots/Units Street Liohts (5800L) 12621 90 T.H. 7 12172-1 20 S.F. 4 12525 12739 12740 122 S.F. 34 12741 • • RESOLUTION N0. cow-co-:~R P.: - ~ , • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEAATION N0. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 WHEREAS, on March 20, 1985, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and 'WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE RE IT RESOLVFn n„ .ne rity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of tfie incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr bed in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. C J RESOLUTION N0. EB3~P0=Y5R A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STRE Ei LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN ASSESSh1ENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNE XAT[ON N0. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING tM INTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHT IPIG ACT OF 1972 AND OFFER PIG A TIME ANO PLACC FOR HEAR I.YG OBJECTIONS THERETO PLOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEG by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of California, as follows: S'c CTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sighting and related facilities in connection with said district. . SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located within roadway right-of-way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the Gity Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2". SECTION 3. Descri tion of Assessment District; That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Counci is o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterf or be undary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of _ said City. SECTION 4. wort of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 6. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are • collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the Lity Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Nearin Notice is hereby given that on April 17, 1985, at the hour of :30 pm in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to Lhe work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not he formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the tune set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so de scrihed. SE CTiON 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. • SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6 96 o the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Oa~il Re o~rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and AOOPTEO this 20th day of March, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on 0. ~ tke s, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authe et, ty ler jaw • ASSESSMEPIT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 O.NNEXATION NO. 7 • '~ ~~ t ,';~' ~~, ., i ,~, =r 1~~.~; ~ ~~ Ir-~ ~. ,~ ~: ~~ i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 • P.NNEXATION NO. 7 o~"'~"0~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA title; ~y"~ '. - COUNTY OF 9AN SERNARDINO ~~, ~ ~~ ~ ?~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA VI ~ i> ~,G NT7 I I OVO MIIRRC CITY FN(:INCCR ACC 9iAAA Holt page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 p.NNEXATION NO. 7 °° ' ,M.. 2 ~7~ ~+ ~', ~~ tm CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO N title; page nrmv nc n n wtn vn ,~t,n n nRnr.,n n STAFF REPORT LL Lv......,~~C 2'f' x ~~~1~ l? DATE: March 20, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Llcyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barhara Krall, Engineer Technician is~7 SUBJECT: Intent to Annex Tract Nos. 12525, 12539, 12540, 12541, 11781, 12772-1, 12621, 11625, 12362 and 9539 to Landscape Maintenance Distr+ct No. 1 as Annexation No. 22 and setting the public heariny for said annexation on April 17, 1985 • Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex the above described tracts to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and setting the public hearing date fnr April 17, 1985. Also attached for preliminary approval is the Engineer's Report for the annexation. RECDMI£NDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report and setting the date of public hearing for April 17, 1985. Re~ctful y su fitted, L H• :ko At ac hments ;~ .. • ^.^ SPIRIT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY January 14, 1985 CITY OE RANCHO CUCWNONGA 9320 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Deer Creek Viliage Notice of Intention to 122 Single Family Homes Join Landscape and Tentative Tract Nos. 12525 Lighting Districts 12739 12740 12741 Gentlemen: On behalf of the Deer Creek Village Homeowners Association for the above subject tentative tracts, we would like to joint the City-wide landscape and lighting districts of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We understand that the City will not maintain the landscape areas along the perimeter streets - namely Center, 26th and Arrow Route and will • therefore be the responsibility of the Deer Creek Village Homeowners Association. Yours truly, DEER CP.EEK PARTNERS By: W. S. Going, Inc. A General Partner ey; i 1 W nn 5. Going, Jr. President JV8 cc: Ms. D~itas Esperanza Fuscoe, Williams, Lindgren & Short 145 WEST ,MAIN STREET 7USTIN. CALIFORNIA 92680 714; 731-7900 .z ~, ., FnoineerinG Department Citc of Rancho Cucenon ;a 93'_0 Baseline Road Rancho Cu camonGa, C:\ 91730 R F.: TP,A CT I7C91 So rt beast Corner of Grove and 8th Gen[leaca, .;anuarp 3, 1985 Piease accept ch is letter as formal request to form and/or join the appropriate Landscape and Lighting District as required per condition P-3 of the conditions of approval of tract 12091. Should you require any further information or have any questions, please contact Steve Wheatley • ,it >tephen Daniels Commercial Brokerage, Inc., 980-$868. Thank vou. 1 u :n -i D~ ~ :A .~ C.., CIfY OF FAi1CMC CUG:+~•I~~IG•~ E';OiNEEN1.'lu ONISIU'I Sincerely, t Dominic Sal va[i, Applicant • Roy E. Daly Construction Corporation • GOo p~ December 11, 1984 Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs, Daly Construction Corporation respectfully requests the annexation of Tracts 11625 and 11781 into the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District. • If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call at (714) 987-8024. S'. cerely ar onnerUt n Project Manager DC/mm )9y . California Office (714) 887-8024 9310 Baseline • Suite 102 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ,,I,s 5i' BOYER ENGINEERING CO. February ', i99i City of Bancho Cucamonga Commun-ty Development DeFartment P. 0. Bos 907 Ranchc Cucamonga, California 9173C A[t cation: Barbara Xrall ae; Tract tio. 1277?-1 Gentier.en: On behalf of our client, Norris and Searles, e•e hereby request permission to join the City-Wide Street Lighting and Maintenance ^is[rict for the above referenced Tract. V truly yours, Dave Gillette • DG:m7b __. Norris b Searles • 2950 AIRWAY AVENUE, B•2 • COSTA MESA, CA 92626 • (714) 966.0808 Ittclncood Deuelopmrat Co. Y6:~ moo. Saa Gnbriet /fled. • l aMndenn. Ca1I/ornta 4110 January 22, 19Bi Barbara Kroll City of Rancho Cucamonga E ny ineering Department 9326 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91736 Dear Ms. Kroll: We request that our condominium project on the southwest corner of Arrow and Madrone, Tract 12621 be moved into tha crty's Lantlscape/Lightrng District. We will provide what ever is needed to join Tract 12621 into the District. • Very truly yours _ ~,~~~ it ~- ~j. sit- r~~t' Si:mt • Roy E. Daly Construction Corporation December 11, 1984 Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs, ' Daly Construction Corporation respectfully requests the annexation of Tracts 11625 and 11781 into the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call at - (714) 987-8024. 5' cerely 1 ar on eiton Project Manager DC/mm California ORice (714) 987-8024 I aL;r 8310 Baseline • 9ulte 102 • Rancho Cucamonga, bA 91730 i; ; .. IUEYGWf.~•41~• • December 1, 1983 Mr. Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer City Of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91130 Re: Tentative Tract #12362 Dear Mr. Hubbs: We are the developers of Tentative Tract N12362 consisting . of 22 buildings totaling 88 units on approximately 6.5 acres located on the southwest corner of Hellman and Baseline Rd. in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, We agree to have the tract included in the "Special Assessment District" for landscape and the "Special Pssessment District" for lighting, as provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Sincerely, ,G ~GL7vl(j,y~ ~e Carman Project Manager 73a3FFCLL~FAX.a\'F.. R:1.'~CIFII000.\~IONG.\, C:\LIFC1RSl:\91730 (714)989.1725• • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNEI(ATION N0. 22 to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Tract Nos. 12525, 12091, 11781, 12772-1, 12621, 11625, 12362 and 9539 SECTION 1. Authority far Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Caiifornia (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new tracts into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 12525, 12091, 11781, 12772-1, 12621, 11625, 12362 and 9539 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the Tract Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by the developer and have been approved as part of the improvement plans for Trott Nos. 12525, 12091, 11781, 12772-1, 12621, 11625, 12362 and 9539. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in conformance with the Planning Commission. Reference is hereby made to the sub,lect Tract Map and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. • The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (including Annexation No. 22 comprised of 29,485 square feet of landscaped area) is shown below: Total Annual Maintenance Cost 5.30 K 564,503 square feet Per Lot Annual Assessment 5169,350.90 = 4863 = E169,350.90 534.82 Per Lot Monthly Assessment 534.82 = 82.90 12 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached Assessment Oiagr am. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced by the amount saved by the District due to said homeowner maintenance. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement far Annexation No. 22 is found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June 1985, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the 1982/83 fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Light ing Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adapts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. n U • • RESOLUTION N0. ~.,~;r r • A RESOLUTION OF THE CSTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 22 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on March 20, 1985, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and ezpens es of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report far t~rposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. r1 LJ RESOLUTION Y0. f63-'~BhGR~" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT OISTRI CT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 22 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. I; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 197E AND OFFERING R TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NO'W, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri Lion of Work: That the public interest and convenience require an it is t e intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenhelt purposes 6y deed or recorded subdivision tract maD within the 6oundari es of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental • lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to b_ located within roadway right-of-way and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and mare particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 22 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1". SECTION 3. Descri Lion of Assessment District: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City ouncil, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which Said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior houndary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 22 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. ~J SECTION 4. R~e ort of~En inee~r: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved the report of the engineer of work which report • indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 22, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the nett fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given toot on April X1985, at the hour of :3 in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said Cf ty prior to the time set far the hearing, and no other protests ar objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property • described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so oescribed. SECTION 7. landscaping and Lighti~ Act of 1972: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried t rough in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section of the Government Code. The Mayor shad sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The~Oail R~e o~rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntar i0 'o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mike s, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authe et, City C erk j as r1 LJ • ;ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 22 _. - '~I unor n< •_ I ~I r~. r ~'_'~ rips, for Lam.."_, Qi, I Q .~ v.. _ C - I ~ f~Fa~' ~~ sue. 1 I fr c 1 -~. ~. I ~ ~: ,,:, =~.~ ~~ Vi==i ~'1=~1 ~+~~ ¢ I ~ ~~~ r^ - K~ll ^'-- o ~ ~ iii; ~.L-:~ ~`~.rp 4~~ ~I ~ I„ ~ ~~ ~~i=~, :, ~~~ ,_; ,,rte-,. ~ ~. __ \ i li I~~l ~ n¢e«wo cone TI °" ,~~~~~, CITI' OF RA\CI 10 CC'CA\10\GA TR.12621 ~W':::y.'i'~, ' •° '~ ~~~r I^ ENGINEERING DR'ISION ~; 6~~ ~, -wn VICINIT\' MAP a c P R ;ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 • ANNEXATION NO. 22 - ch- ". -. ~ E - - _--= ~~-~ J. ~ _ ^ ~~` ! ,. r ~ J ~.I i I ~ ~Y. 1 C _, ~;.,. 1 .. d.48 ~1 ~ .mfg ,.. ' ~ ~ rou.>v.4 ~~ =) Iqs f ~ ~~_ .~i :~~• ~ 3,-~~... -' ~ P (ifs,.nz t=i. !~ ~ ® Ili ._ \ ' _ V (i41 rf ~ I ~. _ - ~ ~ .IH' ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ i ~~ wa ~ __ 16J _ __ Pv5 1\~ - ~~ ~l C 1110 ~~,° '-, clTr or a,~~cl to c~~c,~l~lo~c,~ ate.,-~\; V `6~{ ~' ENGINEERING DIVISION TR.1209i ;9„ vlct~iTV nl,~r N _ P°Re ;ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM • LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 22 to ' ~.~r( -70 ~ .{ ~ -:+r- `gym ~I IrI.L rl _ ~;.,~'~y ~: t3 ~ ~' _ to ~. .,I _- ..~ -. _ R _ Y Y55 11- :7 ~., u`~~ ', __~L1JS_a _~ti _ -_ ~.2/if 'i i .~ I n 9 ~~. ~ wJ I4 I~.I 17 ! i E r~~ .I .ea-..y; ~-~ ] 6 ~ ..:. I•. e r - z s I f= :.J I.. _.L _ _ ~~~~+++ ~ ~.~. ,. I i r~, Lei i I lTn.`. ux ~ e ~ ~ s a n., .. a ,u a n. u~ ., I \`C ~\C\lir)l, cIT~' OP RA\CFIO Cl.'CA,\10\GA /~ - ~,w°'^'' '°` ®'\ TR. 9539 ~,; ~'~,+:'~ ~z ENGINEERING DIVISION o. ~IC1~IT,` ~L,~ N I nags / ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 • ANNEXATION NO. 22 _ - - ~.,,. - ~. ,,.,_ ; L ' ~ -tl~ -+-J . 77 ^ ... I~_.i~J.i~~1. F11 r~ f, _~T~: ~ ~ ' \, ` ~i 1 i `Sev I.• 1 . :: ~~!_I .. Q I> F ;~ _ .~~~.` ti I ~ .~-~1~\ ~~ ~~ r ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ; 'r:. .. ~` ~.~ I .. ,~,~~ ~ 1~,,I,::, ,~:i .1Y~ 1 1 r,~r ~, r r. • ,,,~.r ,,,~,. .~~, ,^ clTr ol~ a~~NCllo ccc:~~lo~c,~ ='~..a«,~~ = TR.1252~ ~ tr - g U~ 6~'~r i~ ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ T wi~ ' VICINITI' Al.\P I\I 11 \ P~Fz ;ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION N0. 22 '`o ~~,r`p~~. C[T1' OP RANCf t0 Cl.'CA,\1( c` ~A~ S ~. ~~{ ~ ENGINEERING DI\'fSION ice' VICINITI' (11AP ---t~ N -~r. ~.. ~; I I ~~~'. I `~ TR.11781 page ;ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 22 - -~. ~ - , » _- ~_ , _ i ~ i I ~.. i ~.. ~ ~.. ~ 9 m _ 4F ~ I . I " ® ~.." ° Gj ® .~ o ' ;'. ~ 11~~ ~~~ -- ~N: ~ '~ ~ - ~~; ~ Ir , ~. =- ~ , . m , ; . o .;a -~_~~ k -... m A y' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Yy• % ~ q .~ Jr; y'. ~ i i i °`~~'~~0~,, CITY OF ltA\CI10 Cl.'CA~~IO~GA ' ~ TR.1236~ .; '~~;= V 6~j ENGINEERING DIVISION ~T v VICINITY M,\P 1 r a e P R ;ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION N0. 22 • ;,^U = ~ >:.- /-b _ ~' ~~ \\ C _ {y tl ;- 1A 'y~ ._~~ ~.i a ~. _ m "~ ~~ ~ \ ~ _~ ~ ~,C_ ~:'~~a a '~, , W ti.. ~G"-'~L.J-. ~ ~r~. ~ ~~ e ~-. .. L..i~ia.. a k~W~ e _ ~~~ 7 __ _ 19in_ -__ _ -- SieEET ~~. ~., `~~~"O CITY OP RA1Cfi0 CC'CA~10\GA ~' ~" TR• 11625 ri 6~ ~~ ENGINCERING DIVISION T "~''--19n VICINITI' MAP Il\~II page --. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 • APINEXATION NO. S %' ., i; ~• _ '~ .. 3 ~~ F n , ~'e It ~..I 'i ~,~°~``°"""> CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA title 7'_:yei~ ~ _ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ ?B. ~~ :~ .6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA VI ~ I> 1917 --~ - LLOVp HU99S. CITY ENfi^a==A P. T= Zvag3 pgTE page +i '_~~~'~ I =i.. , '~~~pp, F ~ ~, i ~"`"„~°,. c1Tt~ or a~~~cl to ccc,~~lo~c,~ - ~ '` ~~ ~;~ ~~ eNCINeERINC olvlsloN 19~' VICINITY M1tAP N page ,.. ., ~..,.. w..,w.,, . 9 STAFF REPORT ~~`v , ~°~ it i `, ~ ~i~ i9~ I • March 20, 1985 TO: City Manager and City Council FROM: Jerry R. Grant, Bu+iding Official SUBJECT: RDOP7ION DF UN IFDRM MECHANICAL CODE I. BACKGROUND This ordinance received first reading at the March 6 meeting far adoption of the 1985 Uniform Mechanical Code. II. SUMMARY: The City Attorney has identified inadequacies in the adoption and noticing of this ordinance. Additionally it appears desireable to adopt several of the codes at one time rather than piecemeal. III. RECOMMENDATIDN: That the City Council hold a hearing to allow input for those responding to the notification and terminate action of this ordinance to allow for preparation of consolidated adoption of ordinances and their return following appropriate notification and hear inq procedures. 1 • ORDINANCE N0. 252 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTTY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 1982 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE The City Council. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION is Chapter 4 of Division 3 of Title 6 of the San Bernardino County Code adopted by erdiance No. 17 Ss hereby repealed. SECTION 2: Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cede is hereby amended by adding a new chapter 15.13 tc read as follows: Chapter 15.13 UNIFOflM MECHANICAL CODE Section 1$.13,p10 ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. The City adopts 6y reference the Uniform Mechanical Code, 1982 Edition, copyright 1982 by the International Conference of Building Officials, pages 11 to 280 inclusive, including Chapter 21 of ADPrendlx B, and said Uniform Mechanical Code is adoptetl as the law of the city except as provided for in :his chapter. Three copies eF the code have been and are now flied 1n the office of the City Clerk for public record • and inspection, and the eo tle is referred to, and adopted by reference as if incorporated and set cut a length 1n this chapter, under the provisions of Government Cede Sect Son 50022.1 et.seq. Section 15.13.020 BOARD OF APPEALS. Section 203 of the Uniform Mechanical Code Ss amended to read as follows: Section. 203 BOABD OF APPEALS. In order to provl de for final interpretation cf the provisions of this Code and to hear appeals provided for hereunder, there is hereby established a Board of Appeals consisting of five (5) members, said members to be members of the City Council or persons, ether than employees of the City, appointed by the City Co~mcil and who shall hold office, at Sts pleasure. The Building Official shall be an ex-officio member of and shall act as Secretary to said Board. The Boartl may adept reasonable rules and regulations for conducting its business and shall render all decisions and Findings in writing to the Buileing Official with a duplicate copy to the appellant. Section 15.13.030 VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES. Section 204 of the Uniform Mechanical Code, 1982 Edition, Ss amended to read as follows; Section 204. IE shall be unlavful for any person, firm or • corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use or maintain any mechanical systems or equipment or cause or permit the same to be done in violation of this code. Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this Code shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Code is committed, continued, or permitted, and conviction of any such violation such person shall be punishable by a fine of not more than =500.00 or by imprisonment for a term not exceeding six (b) months, or by both fine and imprisonment. Section 15.13.040 FEE SCHEDULE. The Uniform Mechanical Code, 1982 Editlcn, is amended by deleting Tabie No. 3-A, Mechanical Permit Fees, and by amending Section 304 to read as follows: Section 304(a) PERMIT FEES. The fee for eanh permit shall be as set forth in duly adopted City Council Resolution. whenever any work, far which a permit is required by this Code, has been commenced without first obtaining said permit and when such work la discovered as a result of an investigation, the permit fees specified by City Council Resolution shall be doubled. The payment of such double fee shall not exempt any person f: om compliance with all other provisions of this Code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. Section 304(b) PLAN REVIEW FEES. when a plan or other data is • required to be submitted Dy Subsection (b) oC Sect icn 302, a plan review £ee shall be paid at Lime of submitting plans and spec if Seations for review. The plan review fees for mechanical work shall be as set forth in City Council Iesolution. where plans are incomplete or are changed so as to require additional plan review, an additional plan review fee shall be charged at the rate set forth in City Council Resolution. Section 304(c) EXPIRATION OF PLAN REYIEw. Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date cf application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request from the applicant showing that circumstances beyond the control oC the applleant have prevented action from being taken. No application shall be extended sore than once. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applleant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee, Section 304(d) EXEMPTION FROM FEES. Neither the state nor this nor any other county, city, district, or other political subdivision, nor any public officer or body acting in his ofP1c1a1 capacity on behalf of the state or of this or any county, city, district, or other political subdivision shall pay or deposit any fee required by this code. Th1a Section deer not apply to the State Compensation Fund or Public Housing Authority or where a public • officer is acting with reference to private assets which have come under his ~urisdlction by virtue of his office. • Section 304(e) REFUNDS. In the event that any person shall have obtained a mechanical permit and no portion of the work or nenstruction covered by such permit shall Gave been commenced and such permit shall have expired as provided for in Subsection (d) of Section 302, the perad.tt ee, upon presentation to the Building Official of a written request en a form provided therefore, shall be entitled to a refund In an amount equal to eighty percent (80¢) of the mechanical permit fee actually paid for such permit; however, the portion of the fee retained shall never be less than fifteen dollars (F15.00) or the total fee in event the Fee paid was less than fifteen dollars. In case a permit is issued in e.^..-or by the building Official, all fees shall be returnetl to applicant upon written request. No refund shall be granted when receipt of the request occurs more than 1B0 days following payment oP the permit or plan review fee. No portion of a plan review fee shall be refunded; unless no checking has Oeen performed on a set of plans, in which case eighty percent (80F) of the plan review fee shall be refunded; however, the portion of the fee retained shall never 6e less than fifteen dollars ({15.00) or the total fee in the event the plan review fee paid was less than fifteen dollars. The Building Official shall satisfy himself as to the right of such applicant to such refund and each such refund shall be paid as provided by law for the payment of claims against the City. Section 15.13.050 REINSPECTIONS. Subsection (f) of Section 305 of • the Unifo.^m Mechanical Cede is amended to read as follewa: Subsection 305(£) REINSPECTIONS. A reins pectinn fee may be assessed for each Snspectlvn or reinspeetion when such portion of work for which inspection is called is not complete cr when required corrections have net been made. This provi Sion Ss not to be interpreted as requiring reinspeetion fees the first time a Job Ss reJeoted for Callure to comply with the requirements of thi9 Code, buE as controlling the practice of calling for inspections before the fob is ready for inspection or reinspect ion. fleinspeetivn fees may be assessed when the approved plans are net readily available to the inspector, for failure to provide access on the date for which inspection Ss requested or for deviation from plans requiring the approval of the 6ul lding official. To obtain reinspeetion, the applioant shall file an application therefor Sn writing open a form furnished for that purpose and pay the reinspeetion Cee as set forth Sn City Council flesolut ion. In instances where reinspeotion Pees have been assessed, no additional inspection of the work will be performed until the required fees have been paid. I"1 LJ SECTION 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, • part or portion of this Ordinance Ss for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any covet of competent ,Jwisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council declares it xould have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phase, part or portion thereof, irrespective that any one of more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phases or portions de declared invalid or uncoastituti naal. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall slga this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published xithin Pifteen (15) days after Sts passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation pu611shed in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, antl ADOPTED this 20th day of Narch, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Hikels, Mayor • ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk C , J ., nn n . wrnxsn nrrn ~ ernwrr ~ • STAFF REPORT ~~' >.y I~ ~ C IA U 12 I) 197 March 20, 1985 T0: City Manager and Ctiy Council FROM: Jerry R. Grant, Building Official SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF UNIFORM HOUSING CODE I. BACKGROUND: This ordinance is an update of the 1979 Uniform Housing Code currently part of the Municipal Code. The Housing Code applies to maintenance and use of dwelling occupancies and establishes procedures for achieving repair or abatement of substandard builAings in those categories. A public hearing has been advertised for this meeting. II. SUMMARY: This item falls into the same category as the previous item relative to continuation of adoption procedures. III. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council hold a hearing to allow for those responding to the notification and terminate action on this ordinance to allow for preparation of consolidated adoption of ordinances and their return following appropriate notification and hearing procedures. • • ORDINANCE N0. 8-8.2920 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CIICAMONfq, CALIFORNIA, RDOPTING THE 1982 EDITION OF THE 11N (FORM HOUSING CODE. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does herebv ordain as fol cows: SECTION I: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by de letinq the existing Chapter 15.16 in its entirety and by add inq a new Chapter 15.16 to read as follows: Chanter 15.16 UNIFORM HOUSING CODE. Section 15.16.010 ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. The City adopts by reference the Uniform Housing Code, 198? Edition, copyright 1982 6y the International Conference of Buslding Officials, and satA Uniform Housing Code is adopted in total as the law of the City except as hereinafter provided. Three copies of said code have been and now are filed in the office of the City Clerk for public record and inspection, and the code is referred to, and adopted by reference as if incorporated and set out at length in this chapter, under the • provisions of Government Code Section 50022.1 et.seq. Section 15.16.020 Section 203 amended - Board of Ropeals. Sectior, 203 of the Uniform Housing Cade is amended to read as follows: Section 203 BOARD OF APPEALS. In order to or ovide for f;nat interpretation of the provisions of this code aM to hear anneals provided for hereunder, there is hereby established a Board of Aopeais consisting of five (5) members, said members to be members of the City Council or persons othr_r than employees of the City, aDPOinted by the City Council and who shall serve at its pleasure. The Building Official shall be an ex officio member of and shall act as Secretary to said Board. The board my adopt reasonable rules and regulations for conducting its business and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the Building Off itial with a duplicate copy to the appellant. Appeals to the Board shall be processed in accordance with fh apter 12 of this Cnde. Section 15.16.030 VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES. Section 204 of the Uniform Housing Cade, 1982 Edition, is amended to read as follows: Section 204. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use or maintain any building or structure or cause or permit the same Lo be done in violation of this code. Ordinance No, B-3-20-020 Page 2 Any person, firm or Corporation violating any Of the provi5 ions of this Code shall be deemed quilty of a misdemeanor, anA each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Code is committed, continued, or permitted, and conviction of any such violation such person shall be punishable by a fine of not more than 5500.00 or by imprisonment for a term not exceeding six (6) months, or by both fine and imprisonment, Section 15.16.040 Section 1501 amended -- Repair or demolition. Section 1501 of the Uniform Housing Code is amended to read as follows: Section 1501 (a). PROCEDURE. When any work of repair or demolition is to be done pursuant to Section 1401 (c) 3 of this code, the Buildinq Official shall cause the work to be accompitshed by city personnel or by private contract under the direction of the Buildinq Official. Plans and specifications therefore may be prepared by the Building Official or he may employ such architectural and engineering assistance on a contract basis as he may deem reasonably necessary. Section 1501 (b) COSTS. The cost of such work may be made a special assessment against the property involved, or may be made a personal obligation of the property owner, whichever the legislative body of this .iurisd;ction shall determine is appropriate. SECTION 2: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is far any reason held to he invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent ,jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The Citv Council declares it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective that anv one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SEC'" N 3: The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City f, Jerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof and cause the same to be published within fifteen g15) days after its passage, at least once, in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California and circulated in the f,1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, and thereupon, and thirty (30) days after its passage, this ordinance shall take effect and be in force. C CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 20, 1965 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Lisa A. Wininger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENV I~40NMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85-OlA RICHAROS - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Low Density Residential to Industrial Park for 2.5 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main - APN 209-052-01, and 02. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant requested a General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Industrial Park for a 1.2 acre site in order to sell the property which is currently utilized as a forge to an electrical contractor for use • as warehouse storage and office space. The Planning Commission expressed concern regarding amending the Land Use Map of the General Plan for 1.2 acres and directed Staff to study expansion of the project area and land use compatibility issues. The expanded project area selected by the Commission included the original 1.2 acre site and an addf tional 1.3 acre vacant site located directly east. The Commission determined that the Low Density Residential designation was less appropriate for the project site which is adjacent to a major thoroughfare and the railroad right-of-way, and that the less intense Industrial Park designation would be a more appropriate change. The attached Planning Commission report provides more detailed information relative to this item. I:. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the General Plan Amendment. if the City Council concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. R ~ yy submitted, P1 RG:C9f7ns Attachments: Plannin7 Commission Staff Report -February 27, 1985 ~ Resolution of Approval -: i RESOLUTIO"1 "10. 95-?5 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIOtJ 6F THE C[TY OF RAI:CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ADOPTED LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all continents on the proposed General Plan Amendment 86-01- A. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Ptann ing Cammiss ion does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the following amendment to the Land Use Eiement of the General Plan. SECTION 1: The General Plan Land Use Map shall be amended as follows: APN 209-061-01 and 02 currently designated as Low Density Residential shall be changed to Industrial Park for 2.5 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main. SECTION 2: A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption by the ity Council for this General Pian Wnendment, based upon the completion and findings of the [n itial Study. APPROVED AtJO ROOPTEO THIS 27TH OAY OF FEBRUARY, 1985. ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cac amonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of Fe6ru ary, 19$5, by the followfng vn to-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, MC NIEL, CHITIEA, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE :l ~ ' ,:, ra Febru zry 27, 1985 Dear Sirs I am writing in response to a letter I have received at my home in regards to a possible zone change from residential to manufacturing in my neighborhood. I am writing you to ~~egister my strong protest against the change. This has been a residential neiahhrrhood for many years and we want to keep it that way. !1y husba r,d has lived on this land for over 60 years and I have lived in our home for 17 years. Mast of the residents of this community have been living here for most of their lives. We do not want our homes to be surrounded by factories. [ live at 9819 Main Street which is next to a large vacant lot. If anything is to go on that land I want it to be residential and not manufacturing. This zone change would raise our property taxes and chanye the nature cf our neighborhood. This may not be the nicest • residential in Rancho Cucamonga but it is ours and it is the only place we can afford to live. We do not want `a stories here. And I again state that I am very strongly opposed to any chances in zoning for this area. I hope my voice is heard because i would be Brea tty affected by any change. My husband who is 74 and has spent almost his entire life here is also very strongly opposed to anv rhanoe. Please take into consideration our situation before any chance is made. Sinre re ly, 'y~ ~ ~ y r ~, e , C, G%_.C. C 2L' ~ A ,~ • ~~~/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ct,Na H ~y STAFF REPORT ~~ , , • <~ s ~ y ` ~~ z ~ ~Z 19%% DAiE: February 27, 1985 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Lisa A. Wininger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85-01- A - RI CHARDS - A request to amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan from Low Density Residential to Industrial Park for 3.9 acres of land located on the east side of Archibald between Feron and 8th - APN 209-061-1, 2, 21, 22, 29; 209-062-1, 2. I. ABSTRACT: A General Pian Amendment was requested to change the land use designation from Low Density Residential to Industrial • Park far a 1.2 acre site at the southeast corner of Archibald and Main (see attached report). The Planning Commission directed staff to study the proposed land use change in terms of an expanded project area to include the project site and other parcels to the north and east, and determine the appropriateness of the proposed change for a larger area. At this meeting, the Commission will consider the land use change and determine if the project area is to be expanded. II. BACKGROUND: At the January 26, 1985, Planning Commission meeting, a request was considered for a General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Industrial Park for a 1.2 acre site located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main (see attached report). At that time, the Commission expressed concern regarding the advisability of amending the Land Use Map of the General Plan for a 1.2 acre area. Staff was directed to study expansion of the project area and land use compatibility of the proposed change with on and off site uses. II1. ANALYSIS: A. Project Area: The expanded project area which was examined by staff includes seven parcels located on the east side of Archibald between Feron and the AT' and SF railroad right-of-way, divided by Main Street (see Exhibit A). The area north of Main Street consists of five parcels with three single family ITE'i F Planning Commission Staff Report P ebruary 21, 1985 GPA 85-O1-A -Richards Page s2 homes, a neighborhood market and vacant land. The area borders by single family homes to the east and is approximately 1.4 acres in area. The General Plan designates the land use as Law Oen sity Residential, as does the Development District designation. The two parcels located south of Main which equal 2.5 acres consist of the Custom Alloys site which was originally proposed for the General Plan Amendment and a vacant parcel owned by the Santa Fe Railroad. Bordered on the east by single family homes and the south by the railroad right-of-way, the area's current General Plan and Development Oist rict designation is Low Density Residential. • In examining the merits of changing the General Pian Land Use Designations for these areas, it appears that the proposed Industrial Park use would be • inappropriate for the area north of Main Street. The existing residential uses conform with the Low Density designation although the commercial use is non- conforming in nature. Single family development closely borders the eastern edge and the lot configuration and area (1.4 acres) would limit development of industrial park uses. The area south of Main appears to be mare appropriate for industrial park uses. The two parcels make up a larger area (2.6 acres) than was originally proposed for the General Plan Amendment and the proposed land use change would not conflict with any on-site uses. The eastern boundary of the area is separated to some extent from existing residential uses by the undeveloped right-of-way for Reid Street and would be impacted somewhat less by the proposed industrial park use than by the existing forge activities. Therefore, staff recommends that the project area under analysis for the proposed Gen eras Plan Amendment include the two adjacent parcels east of Archibald and south of Main (APN 209-062-01, 02). Land Use Compatibility: The proposed change from Low Density Residential to Industrial Park could impact surrounding uses through additional traffic, noise and • changes in aesthetic character of the neighborhood. u ~ . Planning Commission Staff Report February 27, 1985 GPA 85-01-A - Richards Page r3 However, the Industrial Park designation is the least intense of the industrial uses and a probable reduction in current levels of noise, emissions, and vibration could be anticipated with the elimination of the forge. Residences facing the project site on Main would experience most of the impact, should the property develop as an Industrial Park use. It is possible that some of the noise currently experienced from the railroad right-of-way could be buffered from the neighborhood by future development of the project site. Retaining the Low Density Residential designation could expose new residential development to high levels of noise from Archibald and the railroad and would allow continuing operation of the forge as a legal nonconforming use. With the current land use designation, it is unlikely that new development will • occur on-site in the near future. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The California Environmental Quality Act requires that whenever there is evidence that a signff icant impact may occur, an Environmental Impact Report must be prepared. Staff feels that the requested General Plan Amendment could result in some impact in the areas of circulation, aesthetics, health, safety and nuisance as discussed in the Initial Study attached to the previous staff report. However, none of the impacts discussed above would be considered a significant adverse impact which could not be mitigated through the design review process when a proposed project is submitted. Therefore, staff feels that no further environmental analysis at the General Plan level is merited. Further environmental review at the project level should include a full discussion of impacts and mitigation measures proposed in the areas of circulation, aesthetics, health, safety and nuisance. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of - the General Plan Amendment, decide that the change from Low Density Residential to Industrial Park would promote the land use goals and policies of the General Plan and that this Amendment would not be materially detrimental to the adjacent properties or would not cause significant adverse impacts as listed under the Environmental Assessment, the following are the findings that are necessary on approval. Planning Commission Staff Report February 27, 1985 GPA 85-O1-A -Richards Page n4 I A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the land use element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. V[. CORRESPOND"tNCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the boundary of the proposed project. To date, no correspondence has been received. VII. RECOMME NOATION: Should the Planning Commission determine that the Facts for Finding of approval indicate that the land use change is appropriate on the 2 parcels adjacent to the railroad, adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval would be required. In addition, the applicant will be required to file a Development District Amendment to change the DD designation from • "L" to Industrial Specific Plan - Industrial Park. Should the Commission wish to deny the Amendment, a Resolution of Denial is also attached. ResQec tful ly~ubmitted, Rick/ Gomez City Planner RG:LW:cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Project Area Map January 26, 1985 Staff Report Initial Study Resolution of Approval Resolution of Genial ~J • },~ '~~7//J//'J//' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ fiii////////~'_'..1 a Z W O V! W Q i H Vl 2 W O F _~ O W f r a f z w 0 N W G T _F N 2 W D 3 0 J ----- --- .... I o z -~.f I_'- - -- __ -~ ~ I it ~ =~~~c'_ ///i J Q S H' N D 2 J Q W 2 W n,mv nr.~ n ~ war crn nr~n n wenw+r , ____ __ _.___.____ _____...___. _._ ~w u_,,,vt. STAFF REPORT ~~ ',.. x _ ~, Z -,y;; DATE: January 26, 1985 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Lisa A. Wininger, Assistant Planner SU6JECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85-01- A - R[CNA~tDS - A request to amend the Land Use Map of the eneral P an from low Density Residential to Industrial Park for 1.2 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main - APN 209-G61-O1. I. ABSTRACT: A General Plan Rmendment is requested to change the land use designation from Low Density Residential to Industrial Park for a 1.2 acre site located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main. The applicant wishes to cease the current nonconforming use as a forge and sell the structure for use by an electrical contractor as office, warehousing and Storage facility. The Commission will determine if the proposed change is appropriate in terms of scope and land use compatibility. iI. BACKGROUND; The applicant wishes to develop a light industrial use-- on a I.2 acre site ioc ated on Archibald Avenue near the North Town area. The existing industrial activity will be discontinued to allow the proposed office, retail and storage use by an electrical contractor. The current General Plan and Development District designations of Low Density Residential do not permit the proposed use. The existing use, a foundry, is currently nonconforming in nature. Consequently, a General Plan Amendment is requested to change the current Low Density Residential designation (2-4 du/acre) to Industrial Park. The purpose of this meeting is to evaluate the proposed General Plan Amendment and any possible alternative land uses for the project site. III. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Amend the General Plan Land Use idap from Low Density Residential (2-4 du/acre) Co Industrial Park. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 95-O1-A - Richards January 26, 1985 Page k2 B. Location: East of Archibald Avenue, south of Main Street. C. Parcel Size: 1.2 acres D. Existing Development District Oes ign ation: Low Density Residential E. Existing Land Use: Metal Forge F. Surrounding Land Use and Development District Design at ions: North - Commercial and Residential (Low Density Residential) South - AT & SF Railroad right-of-way and Residential (Industrial Specific Plan) East - Vacant and Residential (Low Density Residential) West - Commercial and industrial (Industrial Specific Plan) G. Surrounding General Plan Designations: North - low Density Residential South - Gener at Industrial • East - Low Density Residential West - General Industrial • H. Site Characteristics: The project site is bounded on the south by the rai road right-of-way and on the east by vacant parcels. A 9,000 square foot metal building located on the southern portion of the site houses the existing industrial use. Other site features consist of a small outbuilding, paved parking areas, several eucalyptus trees, and other shrubs. IV. ANALYSIS: A. History: When the General Plan was adopted, the North Town area, roughly bounded by Archibald, 26th, Marine, and 8th Streets, was considered to be distinctly single family residential in nature and received a General Plan designation of Low Density Residential. The Custom Alloys forge and the neighborhood market at the corner of Archibald and Main thus became Nonconforming uses. B. Reason far Request: The project applicant wishes to cease operations as a forge and sell the structure for use as warehouse and storage space with limited office and sales activity. Since the proposed use differs significantly from the current nonconforming use, the General Plan Amendment has been requested to permit the proposed use. • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 85-O1-A -Richards January 2G, 1985 Page e3 C. General Plan Land Use Goals and Policies: The existing land use designation of the project site and the surrounding neighborhood is Low Density Residential. The General Plan describes the Low Density Residential designation as "characterized by single family homes...appropriate where the traditional character of detached single family units prevail and where the level of services including roads, shopping and recreation are not sufficient to justify a higher density." In comparison, the Industrial Park designation requested by the applicant is defined in the General Plan as "grouped concentrations of industrial and research and development offices, organized along maj or thoroughfares on the periphery of the Industrial Area". The General Plan states that opportunities should 6e encouraged to mix different but compatible land uses and activities in the City, and that land uses must be organized to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent uses. In addition, it is implied in the Development Cade and the General Plan that nonconforming uses shall gradually be eliminated where possible and replaced with uses that are • consistent with the existing General Plan designation. D. Issues for Consideration: Two major issues arise in consideration of this project. The first issue is that of compatibility of the proposed land use with the existing surrounding land uses. The current industrial use, while separated to some extent from most of the residential use in the area, is clearly incompatible with the single family homes in the area. The operation of a forge with attendent noise, emissions, vibration, traffic, and aesthetic impacts is inappropriate in close proximity to homes. This use has been allowed to continue as a nonconforming use only because it was in operation prior to the establishment of the low Density residential designation. The proposed industrial park, while a less intensive industrial use than the forge, would pose some of the same problems in terms of traffic, noise, and aesthetic quality. Since the existing structure would remain, albeit in a different function, no significant improvement wouid oaur in screening or site design. In addition, the parcel size of 1.2 acres is too small to allow development of additional industrial park uses, thereby limiting the scope of additional development. The second major issue is that of the size of parcels for which General Plan Amendments may be considered. Nhile the PLANNING COMMISSIOtJ STAFF REPORT GPA 85-O1-A -Richards January 26, 1985 Page rf4 City has no formal minimum lot size for General Plan Amendment consideration, past City policy dictates that areas to be amended be defined by logical physical or other boundaries, and Lh at all properties in the immediate area which have similar characteristics be given similar consideration. Allowing amendments for parcels ';i ch do not meet these cr'teria would lead to a "spot zoning" si±uat ion, where small pieta; of land scattered throughout the City bear land use designations which create inconsistent patchwork patterns of land use. Based on the above factors, staff feels that the General Plan Amendment as proposed is not appropriate far the project site. However, the site's proximity to the railroad right-of-way and associated nuisances, to Archibald Avenue, and overall trends of deveiopment in the North Town area, suggest that the Low Density Residential development may not be the optimal ultimate land use for the site either. This report will discuss alternatives for land use of the project site which consider land use compatibility and site constraints. U ALTERNATIVES: In considering alternative land uses for the • project ;ite, it is apparent that the small size of the site limits the scope of any use. In order to discuss alternative uses, it is necessary to maximize the area under consideration to determine if the site may bn linked to adjacent properties to form a larger, more logical project boundary. Exhibit "B" shows the area fronting on Archibald between Feron and the railroad right-of-way which is either vacant or sparsely developed. This area differs significantly from the single family character of the North Town neighborhood and forms a logical area of consideration for changes in land use. Two basic land use alternatives have been considered for the expanded project area under discussion. 1. Industrial Park: The site's proximity to the railroad right way and the Industrial Area as well as its location along a major thoroughfare appear consistent with the typical Industrial Park use. However, incompatibility with surrounding residential uses would again be a problem. Even with an expanded project area, the scale of the project would create a very small Industrial Park. In addition, the parcels are owned by a variety of persons and gaining ownership of a sufficient number of parcels for an integrated development would be difficult if not impossible. • PLANNING COMMISSI C31 STAFF REPORT GPA 85-01-A -Richards January 26, 1985 Page #5 2. Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/ac): Like the Discovery Townhomes project just north of the project area, a medium density residential project would maintain the predominantly residential nature of the area while creating a buffer from Archibald Avenue and the railroad right-of-~aay. This land use would be more compatible with existing residential uses than the current or proposed land uses. However, proximity to the railroad right-of-way could expose residents to railroad and automobile noise which would require mitigation through site design and barriers. Also, problems exist in terms of project scope and parcel ownership. Site design incorporating existing circulation would also be difficult. Since the Medium Density Residential designation allows a range of 4-14 dwelling units per acre, the Development District designation could fall into the Low-Medium (4-8 du/acre) or Medium (8-14 du/acre) categories. Depending on the number of owners wishing to join together in developing their properties, the Commission could determine at a later date if the project scope justified aLow-Medium or Medium designation. • VI. ENV IRONIAENTAL ASSESSMENT: The California Environmental Quality Act requires that whenever there is evidence that a significant impact may occur, an Environmental Impact Report must be prepared. Staff feels that the requested General Plan Amendment as Droposed could result in some impacts in the categories of socio-economic factors, land use and planning considerations, circulation, health, safety and nuisance factors, and aesthetics. Part II of the attached Initial Study discusses each of these impacts in detail. On the basis of these potential impacts, it is suggested additional environmental analysis would be necessary prior to approval of the amendment as proposed. V I1. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commiss ,.?n, upon examination of the Genera lan Amendment, decide that the change from Low Density Residential would promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Plan, and that this Amendment would not be materially detrimental to the adjacent propertf es or would not cause significant adverse impacts as listed under the Environmental Assessment, the fallowing are the findings that are necessary on approval: PLANNING COMMISSJOfI STAFF REPORT GPA 85-O 1-A - Richards January 26, 1985 Page #6 • A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the land use element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. V[I1 . CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the boundary of the proposed project. To date, no correspondence has been received. IX. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis of the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, staff recommends denial of the General Plan Amendment as submitted. Should the Commission wish to consider the alternative land uses discussed, direction should be given regarding the nature of further study of land uses in the project area. The Commission has several alternatives for action: 1. To approve the General Plan Fmendment per the attached Resolution of Approval. This alternative is not recommended. 2. To deny the General Plan Amendment per the attached Resolution of Denial with no further study. This would confirm the current Low Density Residential designation. 3. With applicant's consent, to continue the amendment, and to provide Staff with specific direction as to the scope and type of land use to be analyzed and brought back for Commission action. (Should the applicant decline to consent to the changes in the scope of the amendment, it would be appropriate to deny this request and to initiate a new amendment for review during the next General Plan Amendment cycle.) fitted, ( Rifle Gomez, City Planner RG:LW:cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan and Development District Map Exhibit "B" - Expanded Project Area Map Initial Study Resolution of Denial • Resolution of Approval • CITY OF RANCHO CUCM1NONGa PART II - INITI,IL SIl:DY ENl'IRO`~^'.nNIAL CHECl'LIST DATE: ~Tal1dd/U /0. ~ /(// APPLICA.~7: ~iv(') ~~hJardS / n _, FIL iNG DATE: ~~ /~ ~~7~p /LOG \'L')fBER: '~:'~//~d Y~ D~ ~- PR0IECT: ~'rJ./P/72ip~~ JI~N~ ~l/YI(pl~/f2PK~ PROJECT LocaTIDN: ~C(/{~)PdSt LD//IP_ `' -^ ~" ~fGGI/~~~ a'i~c~/GC- I. E\TIRON?'~'`~T:.L I`II':1CT5 (Exp lanaclon of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attach ed sheets). YES :1iYSE NO . 1. Sails and feolo e•:. Will the proposal have sign:: icon[ resui[5 in: a. L'n stab le ground Condit to ns or in changes in geologic relacionshipsl X _ b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface K contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or mod iEicacion of any unique goo to glc or physical Features? x e. My potential increase Sn vlnd or voter erosion of soils, affecting either on or off 61 ce condicans? )( f, Changes in erosion siltation, of deposition? ~ /\ g. Exposure Of poop la or property to geologic hazards such as ear chqua kes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X h. M lnc rease in the race of ex traction and/or X use of any mineral resource? ~ __ _ 2. Nyd rology. Nill the proposal have slgnif Scant results in: a. Changes in cutren cs, or the course of direction of flea ing screavs, rivers, or epheve ral serene channels? b. Changes in absorpcf on races, drainage patterns, or the :ate and amount of surface eater runof?? c. Alterations co the course or floe of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in anv body of eater? " e. Discharge into Surface va to rs, or anv site ration of su zface eater quality? f. Alteration of grourdva ter characce ris tics? g. Change in the quantity of groundua [ers, either through dire cc additlo ns or uith- dzavals, or through Sn [erference inch an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction Sn the avount of eater u;hu- uise available for public eater supp l: es? i. Exposure of people or property to eater related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Ouali tc. bill the proposal have significant zes alts in: a. Constant oz periodic air eaiss ions frov vobile or indirect sources? Stac ionary sources? h. Deter io ra cion of amb Sent air quality and/or interference with [he attainvenc of ap plicabie air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional cl Seat is conditions, affecting air movement, mo isCUre or tevp era[u re? 4. Biota Flora. Hill the proposal have significant results Sn: Page 2 YES `14YBE 90 _ _ • VX U !\ x. .x _ XX_ X • x - Zi _ X a. Change in [he cha racte rls ties of species, lnclud Sng diversity, distribu ci on, or number -/ of any species of plants? 1l B. Reduction of the numbers of any un Sque, rate -- or eodangt red species of planes? • 'a^2 YES `i4YFE _0 • c. Introduce inn of new of disruptive species of planes into an area? d. Reduction 1n the potenilal for agr icul[u tal production? 'X Fa_na. Will [he proposal hav¢ sign if Scoot zesul is ~~-- ir.: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of snits ls? X f b. Reduction of [he mssbers of any unique, Tare or endangered species of an Wals? X c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to [he migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wlld'_ife habits t? x 5. Peouiation. Wi11 [he proposal have significant results in: • a. Will Che proposal alter the location, distri- buclon, density, diversity, or grevth rate o: the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect ex is [ing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Soc ie-Economic Factors. Will [he proposal have signif icanc results in: a. Change in Ioca2 oz regional ratio-economic characteristics, including economic or co©ercial diversity, [ax rate, and property _ values? ~( b. Will proj ece costs be eqv Stably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, Cax payers or project users? __ 7. Land L'se and Planninc Consideraifons. Will the proposal have signif icanc resul cs in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? ~ - b. A conflict with any designs [ions, objectives, pollcles, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? ,~' c. M impact upon the qulaity of quantity of exlstfng consumptive or non-consumptive recreational opportunities? X Page r YES AdF?- _0 E. Transuerta tion. Will the proposal have s13n 1.`icar,t • results in: a. Generation of substantial additlenal vehicular movecent? b. Ef feces on ex lst ing streets, or de":a nd for nee street conscruccian' ~( c. Effects on ex lsting parking facili eies, or demand for neu parking? )( d. Subs cac[ial iepac: upor, existing [ransporta- ' ilon syscexs? X e. Al Cerailons [o present patterns of circ~la- tion or movement of people andior goods.' X E. Aliera:!ons to or offec[s on present and poten tlal eater-borne, rail, sass transit or air traffic? K g. Znczeas es Sn [raif is hazards [c color vehicles , b icyclis [s or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Ni11 the proposal have signif ica^c results Sn: • a. A dls a-Sauce to the integri:? o.` archaeological, paleon [o logical, and/or histe rival resources? 1( 10. Health, Saf et v, and ;;uisance Factors. Nill the proposal have slgnif icanc results in: . a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people co potential health hazards? ___ ;( c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances Sn the event of an acclden c? d. M increase in the number of Snd iv id uals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? X e. Increase in exis[Sng noise levels'. ?~ f. Exposure of people [o pocencia lly dangerous no lse levels? X _- • g. The creation of obi ectlonahle odors? k h. M increase in light or glare? V - Page 5 YES "AYBE NO • 11. Aesthetics. WS11 the proposal have signlf Scant results ir.: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? `~( b. The treat ion of an aesthetically offensive site? ~( c. A con_lic[ with the objective of designated or poten vial scenic corridors'. 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a signlffcanc need for new sy seems, or al Cera[Sons [o the foil owln g: a. Elec[::c power? b. Natural or packaged gas? ~~ c. Communicatlorc systems? .C d. Water supp l}•? e. Wastewater fat it Sties? • f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities". h. Fire protection? __ 1. Police pro tectlon? j. Schools? `~ k. Parks oz other recreational fat ill[Ses? X I. Maintenance of pu611c fat it ides, including roads and flood control Fac ilicfes? m. Other gavernmen [al services? 13. Enerev and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal - have slgn:[icanc results in: a. Use of subscancial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Subs canctal Sncrease in demand upon exis clog sources of energy? c. An increase in :he demand for development of new sources of energy? X d. An Sncrease or pecpetuatlon of the consumption of non-renewable forns of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? _ ~' Page 6 e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. ttanda[orv Findings of Signi'i YES !tAYOE YO k ~ a. Does the project have [he po centfal co degrade the qua 11 [y of [he environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish ar vildlife species, cause a fish or vildlife popula [ion co drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to elimina [e a plane or ani¢al community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plan[ or animal or el i¢inate important examples of the major periods of Cal if ornla history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the po [en[i..: [o achieve short-ter¢, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (q shore-term impact on the environment is one which occurs Sn a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). ~- c. Dues the project have impacts which are Snd ividual ly limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively corn lderab le means chat the incremental of .'et is of an individual project are considerable when viewed Ln connection with the eEfetts o[ pas[ projects, and probable future projects). ~i d. Does the prol ect have envir~ =.encal effects vhi ch will cause substantial adverse eEEec cs '' on human beings, either di:ec tly or lod ireccly? ~ II. DIS CL'SSIOV OF E~*VIaOli1R'!;TgL EVgLJATIOY (i.e., of afflrmacive answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). ~~~~ • Page ~ III. DE?EA`!INdTI C:; • On the basis of this 1rti [Sal evaluation: ^ I find the proposed project COCLD NOT have a significant eff ecc on the environment, and a NECATA'E DEC'..~;RATION will 6e prepared. I find that although the proposed pzoj ecc could have a significant ~.• ~ effect on the environment, [here uill not be a signif lean[ effect Sn ch is case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added [a the proj ecc. A NEGATZtB DECLARATION DILL BE PREPARED. r-- 1 I find the proposed project 2fAY have a significanr effect on the 1 envirnment, and an ENVIROF~ST I:@ACT RE703i is required. Cure • I< ~ Z • II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION/MITIGATION MEASURES P~oulation - The change from a residential to industrial land use would alter the location and distribution of housing planned for the North Town area and replace it with a nonresidential use, therzby altering planned population patterns. However, due to the scale of the project, no significant impacts on population trends will be experienced. No mitigation measures are requ ireJ. Land Use and Planning Considerations - Since the proposed project i5 a General Plan Amendment, it represents a departure from the land use of the site and surrounding area. Should the General Plan Amendment be approved, the following mitigation measures will be required at the project design review level. 1. Rdequ ate buffering between the project site and surrounding residential uses shall De incorporated in the site plan. 2. Siting of the industrial park uses shall minimize impact on adjacent uses in accordance with the general design nuidelines of the Development Code. Trans ortat ion - The warehousing and storage activities could create • additiona evels of traffic on Main Street and Archibald. In addition, it is likely that new parking facilities would be required on-site. Additional traffic could represent a hazard to vehicles and pedestrians in the area. However, these impacts will be mitigated by the following measures, implementing the design review process. 1. Access and circulation shall be designed to provide a safe and efficient system on and off-site in accordance with Section 17.10.060 of the Oeve lopment Cade. 2. Parking areas shall De designed to minimize visual disruption, noise and light and glare through the use of walls, location, landscaping, etc. Health Safet and Nuisance Factors - Increased traffic and loading/unloading activities cou d create an increase in the existing noise levels, which are currently much higher than would be created by residential uses. An increase in light and glare could be caused by the additional traffic and lighting required by the light industrial use. Project review at the technical and design review stages serve to minimize noise and light and glare impacts to an insignificant level. Mitigation measures, in addition to those described above are as follows: Operation of the industrial park use shat' comply with the performance standards of the Development Code Section 17.10.050 for noise, light and glare, smoke, maintenance of open areas, vibration, ffre hazard, outdoor storage, air quality and odors. l '! Aesthetics - Continuation of the site in its current state represents an aesthetically displeasing condition to the surrounding areas. The change to Industrial could allow continuing use of the existing building with no site improvement. However, development of the vacant parcel would require design review which would emphasize an aesthetically pleasing design for the site. Continuing use of the Custom Alloys building would not represent an increased aesthetic impact upon the neighborhood; it would continue the current level of impact. Specific mitigation measures required at the design review level 6y the City are: 1. Site design shall conform with the huilding design standards of the Development Code in terms of design theme, scale, materials and colors, signing and screening. 2. The proposed Indus*.rial Park use shall conform with the general design standard of the Development Code for site plan design of industrial buildings in regards to building orientation and landscape/open space. • • 2 -7 • RESOLUTION N0. P-3-2B=2R ? - "" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comnen is on the proposed General Plan Amendment 85-O1-A. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has made the following findings: A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Pmendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. SECTION 2: A Negative Declaration is hereby adopted for this General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. • NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the following amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan for the following described real property: APN 209-061-01 currently designated as Low Density Residential shall be changed to Industrial Park for 1.2 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Main. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk .. /,~ n.mv n STAFF REPORT ~~` Mo"^ c 9 -- 19?; DATE: March 20, 1985 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FISCAL YEAR 985-1986/PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES • ABSTRACT: In accordance with HBD requirements, Staff has prepared the Preliminary Statement of Comm oily Objectives for the Fiscal Year 1985/86 Community Development Block Grant program. The City has received proposals for 13 programs/projects for a total cost of 81,654,800.00. Based on an anticipated Block Grant of $473,000.00, approximately $378,400.00 will he available for project funding. The Council will be asked to make a preliminary selection of those projects which most closely correspond to community needs. The thirteen proposed projects are described in this report. In addition, the City's policies on relocation assis tan::e for those affected by Block Grant funded activities, and on flood hazard protection for rehabilitation of homes in the flood plain are included, as required by HUD. At this meeting, the City Council will also review the attached Statement of Community Objectives, relocation assistance policy and consider the flood hazard protection mitigation measures presented in this report. BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has participated in the Community Development Block Grant Program since 1982 as an entitlement City. Each year, the City has prepared an application to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to secure funding for specific projects and programs which further specified federal and local goals ar~d objectives. Funds are allot. ated to local jurisdictions based on a formula which considers the City population, instance of poverty and instance of overcrowding in the City, In Fiscal Year 1985-66, Rancho Cucamonga has been allocated $473,000.00, a slight increase over Fiscal Year 1984/85 funding, due to population increases in the City. E94,600.00 of this is to be used for local costs and implementation, including approximately $19,000 for an ongoing CDBG administration 1 ~ ., City Council Staff Report March 20, 1985 Page N2 • contract with Cotton/Bel and/Associates and 57,000 for the required Fair Housing Services provided by Inland Mediation Board, leaving 5318,400.00 for projects and programs. Federal regulations specify that projects and activities which are selected for funding must meet certain eligibility criteria which are summarized below: The activity must be carried out in a neighborhood consisting predominantly of persons of low and moderate income and provide services for such persons. In Rancho Cucamonga, only the Northtown and Southwest Cucamonga neighborhoods qualify under this provisf on. The activity must involve facilities designed for use predominantly by persons of low and moderate income; or The ac tivf ty must involve employment of persons, a majority of wham are persons of low and moderate income. Based on these guidelines, the Planning Division solicited proposals for • projects to be funded under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Ten new projects were subrt~i tied for funding in addition to three ongoing programs. Each project is described in detail in the project description sheets contained in the Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives. Staff has evaluated these projects on the basis of Federal regulations and the Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives. The total amount of funding requested for Fiscal Year 1985/86 is $1,654,300.00. However, approximately 5378,400.00 is available for direct project funding. The projects are sunanarized in the attached table. The projects are: 1. Housin Rehabilitation: This is an ongoing program providing Be ow Market nterest Rate (EMIR) and deferred loans and emergency repair grants to eligible households throughout the City, This program is a virtual requirement of the Community Development Olock Grant program. Staff recommends that the minimum funding for the program be set at 580,000.00 to permit eligible households in need of assistance to participate. Requested Funding: 580,000.00 Eligibility; Yes 2y" City Council Staff Report March 20, 1985 Page k3 • 2. North Town Park: This is a multi-year project involving the acquisition and development of a park in the North Town target area. In 1984-85, site acquisition was funded in the amount of 8150,000.00. This year, an additional E150,000.00 is being requested for development of the park. The project is clearly eligible under Black Grant regulations hecause over half the residents of the area are low and moderate income. Requested Funding: E150,000.00 Eligibility: Yes North Town Street Improvements (Area I): This is a multi-year project involving the reconstruction of Acacia, Belmont, and Eighth Streets with the addition of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveway aprons. Planning and engineering for the project was funded in 1984-85 in the amount of 815,000.00. The project is clearly eligible under CDBG regulations because North Town is a low and moderate income area. Requested Funding: 5153,000.00 Eligibility: Yes • 4. Lions Center Ex~ans ion: This is a new project proposed for mu-1t i-year of nding. The Community Services Department is proposing to expand the Lions Center to add both multi-purpose and special purpose rooms for its recreation programs. The existing Center is too small to accommodate all of the programs needed and desired by the community. Since the Center is not located in a target area and will not be used primarily or exclusively by low and moderate income households, the City requested a formal eligibility determination from HUD. Funding proportional to the percentage of law and moderate income residents of the City has been requested, (24.8% or 5136,400.00 of the E550,000.00 estimated total cost). Unfortunately, HUD has determined that the project is not eligible for block grant funding since it does not meet the major requirement of principally benefiting low and moderate income persons. Requested Funding: 5136,400.00 Eligibility: No 5. Southwest Cucamonga Park: This is a new project proposed for multi-year funding. The City would acquire and develop a park in the Southwest Cucamonga target area. The total cost is City Council Staff Report March 20, 1985 Page 54 • estimated at 5600,000.00, but only the site acquisition and planning is proposed for this year. Because the Census information does not show the residents of the area to be predominantly low and moderate income, a special survey of the area was completed in January, 1985, to qualify the project for CDBG funding. The area was clearly identified as eligible for Block Grant benefit. HUD concurs with the eligibility determination. Requested Funding: !300,000.00 Eligibility: Yes 6. Southwest Cuc amonaa Street Improvements (Area 1): This is a new project proposed for mu ti-year funding. it would involve the reconstruction of the streets and addition of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveway aprons on Via Carrillo, Placida Court, Avenida Ve,iar and Sierra Madre. The total cost would be 5250,000.00, of which 525,000.00 is engineering and design. All of these streets are in the target area established 6y the survey. Requested Funding: 5250,000.00 • Eligibility: Yes 7. Southwest Cuc amonaa Street Improvements (Area II 1: This is a new project. It would involve the reconstruction of the streets and addition of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on Calaveras, Salina Avenue, Vinmar Drive and Sierra Madre Avenue between Arrow and Ninth. The total cost is estimated to be 5250,000 of which 525,000 would be engineering and project design costs. Requested Funding: 5250,000.00 Eligibility: Yes 8. Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvements (Area iII): This is a new proje---ct a s~ t would involve the reconstruction of the streets and addition of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on - Calaveras, Vinmar, Sierra Madre between Eighth and Ninth. The total cost is estimated to be $250,000 of which approximately 525,000 would be for project design and engineering. Requested Funding: 5250,000.00 • E11gi6ility: Yes ~ ~. City Council Staff Report March 20, 1985 Page #5 lJ Handicapped Sian s: Several shopping centers in Rancho Cucamonga do not have standing signs making handicapped spaces and citing the Section of the municipal code reserving them for the disabled. Without such signs, the Sheriff will not ticket non-handicapped people who use the spaces. The City cannot at this time require property owners to post such signs and the owners are reluctant to incur the additionai cost, although minor. Funds would be used to make up the signs far posting in older centers throughout the community. Requested Funding: 55,000.00 Eligibility: Yes 10. Chaffe -Garcia House: The Etiwanda Historical Society has requested a47, 00.0' to move, protect, preserve, and restore the Chaffey-Garcia House. When this work is completed, the house will be a museum surrounded by a small park. Since the house is not located in a target area, and will not serve predominantly low and moderate income residents, the City requested a federal eligibility determination from HUD, who has indicated that the project is not eligible since it does not meet the major requirement of principally benefiting low and • moderate income persons. Requested Funding: 547,100.00 Eligibility: No 11. Rolling Start Inc.: Rolling Start is a non-profit public service agency which prov ;Ges a variety of services to assist senor citizens and the disabled to be able to maintain an independent lifestyle. They have requested funding for three of their projects: a. General Counseling, information (510,000) and referral service. b. Lifel ~ine services which provides (515 000) , emergency alert equipment to qualified individuals, provides training in their use, and pays - for a people to respond to an emergency alarm. c. Deaf services - which provides (E 8,000) interpreters, phone relay services, 2 -~ City Council Staff Report March 20, 1985 Page k6 • counseling and referral for the deaf and hearing impaired. Requested Funding: $33,300.00 Eligibility: Yes 12. Gardiner W. S rin Auditorium: Gardiner Auditorium is a regional cultural aci icy used by all the residents of the West Valley, including Rancho Cucamonga. The Chaffey Joint Union School Oistri ct is requesting funds from several cities in the region to rehabilitate the structure, including covering or removing the existing ceiling which contains asbestos and upgrading of the wiring throughout the facility. This project was submitted, but not approved, for funding last year. Requested Funding: $40,000.00 Eligibility: Yes 13. Concerned Citizens for Communit Im rovemen t: According to information submitted, CI is a non-profit organization which provides services to the homeless, including counseling and • referrals, assistance finding housing, food, job training, and medical care to permit the homeless and poor to function independently. Since this is a puDl is service for the poor, all of the costs are eligible. This program was also submitted, but not approved, for funding last year. Requested Funding: 527,500.00 Eligibility: Yes RELOCATION ASSISTANCE POLICY: None of the activities proposed for funding this year or anticipated in 1985/86 would involve the displacement of residents or businesses. However, in the event that displacement should occur, proof sions for relocation assistance will be made in conformance or with the City's adopted Relocation Policy and the requirements of state and federal law. FL000 HAZARD PROTECTION: Although most of the water courses in the City have been channelized to reduce flood hazards, there are some areas which are po~:entially subject to flooding in a 100-year flood, as indicated on the 1984 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Hazard Map. There are residential structures within the floodplain which could he eligible for participation in the rehabilitation program if the owners meet the income requirements. CDBG regulations require the City to develop policies addressing this problem. u City Council Staff Report March 20, 1985 Page k7 • In accordance with Executive Order 11988, staff considered alternatives to rehabilitation of housing in the flood hazard areas and found them impractical or undesirable. One alternative would be to exclude residential units in these areas from the rehabilitation program and encourage the conversion of these areas to other uses. This would not guarantee that the use would change and low income residents of the properties would have no way to finance any necessary repairs of their units. As a result, they would live in substandard conditions and therefore be mare subject to flood damage. Another alternative would be to relocate the residents and remove the units from the flood hazard areas. This would be impractical and quite expensive. In addition, the identified flood hazard areas encompass a mix of residential, public, commercial, and industrial uses. Removal of the residential use would neither remove the danger of flood damage and injury nor return the flood area to its natural state. Therefore, the City has determined that rehabilitation of the units in the flood hazard area is the most practical and desirable alternative. In order to mitigate flood hazard impacts for any units which are rehabilitated under the program, the County of San Bernardino requires that owners of properties located in flood hazard areas show evidence of federal flood insurance coverage before their loans are funded. This • requirement applies to all loans in Rancho Cucamonga. ANALYSIS: In considering project funding for Fiscal Year 1985/86, Staff has reviewed each of the proposals on the basfs of eligibility under Block Grant criteria, status as an ongoing or obligated program/project and project priority in terms of need within the City. A substantial Housing Rehabilitation/Repair program is a virtual requirement of Block Grant programs. The North Town Park and North Town streets projects are multi-year in nature and the City already comni tted substantial funds toward their implementation. Therefore, based on the available level of funding, it appears that the most appropriate projects to be funded are the Nousing Rehabilitation/Repair program, North Town Park and North Town Streets projects. Since total costs for these projects slightly exceed the funds available, (5383,000.00 vs. E378,400.00 available) the Council will need to determine appropriate funding levels for each. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Council adapt the attached eso ut on, resulting in the following actions: 1. Adapt the attached Relocation Assistance Policy as required by HUD. 2. Determine that the continuing operation of the housing rehabilitation program for homes located in the 100-year flood plain is an appropriate alternative and the proposed mitigation measures are adequate. City Council Staff Report March 2C, 1985 P aye a8 3. Select for preliminary funding: • a.HOUSing Rehabilitation, b.North Town Park (2nd Year), and c.florth Town Streets, Area I (2nd Year) and determine funding levels for a total amount not to exceed 5376,400.00. Res rSfully submii't'~d, :~ ~,s-. ..r.-~~ R. ck o~_~pLZ, Gity 1a11n e~ i ~RG:LW:cv 1 • Attachment: Preliminary Statement of Community Obj ettive5 Relocation Assistance Policy • • J 1 > WU~ O .. WJ~ W W O } 1-- C 5 O F zc 6 H y 2 6 ~ '-O-z w 1- ~ _ N U ~ . -i U T J ~ ~ d.nU ~ • ~ Q O GO V = o] 2 y W Q ~ U 6 V N w Wj ~ 0 ~ Q } "~ ~ F ~ d O+ L U 3V Wt z. T q VI N N N N L d GI d O d d N d d O N 6 Yl } y } Z } } Y } } 2 } } y 6 4 Q a] m o] (G m m ab m m an O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 o c o C o O o M O In 0 o ri In o 0 0 o ai ~ ri o ~ m ~n y M O )n !n !++ e m v N . 1 M N N f~! W W l4 W M V1 W W W /1 M VA M 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 ° o ° o ° ~ ~ n o ~ c o O o o o ti Qi O o o O O In n m O n T ID vY O Cl I(1 y V' M y N C M w 4a7 lp N N N o w w w w w w w w w w w u rY d t y y L 'r L V C V d V U d d d .n L O d d d d q YI > C > > C C C C t Y C O L w L v T !n W a i o+ a i Of T l . s E q I y C y y C G C r n a 01 >f C W W W W C O C C pl EE u ~ FE N r wT+ E E i 3 ~ A t~ O ~~ d •~ •~- d H O L U U V U U U U U U UO W K U U L L q q I 01 d d c >) T 1 1 ~+ 1 N Y N .x > > v v v a ~ v v ~i a ~i w E £ z 2 z z z z z x z 2 d 01 ~+ OIV Ofu > > N ~ G C C C C C N O C O C d Y d L Yr O Y~~ E g N N E E ~ L E E q N OI q O N G p L q Y Y L y> U> U> y aJ MI V 6 y C C q O O 7 O 0 0 U L a i N q c O q a n u L n V L n U L n - a L ro q + O U 1 ~ / e 3 x u ro u c_ u E~ . . u E~ d 6 O ~ In ¢ a Of~ H O H W U VI OI d C N ri.~ d .ti N •+ ~-+ d r N rr mr d ^ 6 q 1 >f OI L d 01 C e •~ L 3 0 3 N 3 u t u u d c C L p L L VI 41 L E L d q L d q ~ d q ~~ P 41 N q C Y FI q ~.) d UI N d C1 M y L a Y~ a U 1 O L L O C O U O L L O L L O L L C q ^ L C ~ ONQ OaJQ q L O q O > SK 2 Z JU yU yVl yy`-' Nye Z U C O U 1 rl .V ~ O 10 )O 1~ OJ O1 O rl N f.1 ^1 H .y r-1 l • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RELOCAT[0Y ASSISTANCE POLICY FOR THE COMMUNITY OEVEL OPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Recent changes in the regulations governing the expenditure of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds require that the City establish a policy governing the provision of relocation assistance to any family, individual, business, nonprofit organization or farm that results from implementation of its CDBG programs. It is the policy of the City to avoid displacement of all families, individuals, businesses, nonprofit organizations and farms in carrying out its CDGB programs. No displacement is expected to result from the activities proposed for the 1985-86 fiscal year. However, in the event that operation of any of the CDBG funded programs results in the voluntary or involuntary displacement of any family, individual, business, nonprofit organization, or farm (whether owner or renter) the City will provide relocation assistance in accordance with the st>~dards and guideiines set forth in the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act and Section 7260 et. sea. of the • State of California Government Code (Title 25, Chapter 6) and the guidelines issued by the Commission of Housing and Community Development. The City will meet its relocation responsibilities through the use of its staff and con suitants, supplemented by assistance from local realtors, social agencies, and civic arg anization s. [t is the City's objective that all displacees be relocated with a minimum of hardship in accommodations which are decent, safe, sanitary, and suitahle to their individual needs; located in areas not less desirable than their current location in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities, and reasonably accessible to their customers or places of employment; and priced within their financial means. The City anticipates no relocations, and will handle those which result from implementat ton of CDBG activities in an individual, case-by-case manner. Services provided to eligible displacees shall include but not be limited to: Providing information on project activities, rights, benefits, and options open to them. Maintaining liaison between displacees and agencies or firms with resources to assist them (e. g., Chamber of Commerce, Small Business Administration, Office of Local Economic Development, lending institutions, realtors, etc.) o Locating, inspecting, evaluating, or stimulating the production of accommodations to meet the needs of all displacees. o Assisting displacees in obtaining financing. • o Assisting displacees in securing priority consideration for Section 8, public housing, or other housing assistance programs. o Making referrals to appropriate social, community, and welfare agencies. o Assisting eligible displacees to prepare claims for all relocation assistance payments to which they are entitled. o Keeping records, maintaining files, and coordinating all relocation activities. o Providing all families, individuals, businesses, institutions, and farms which are displaced by CDBG-funded programs, with written notice of this policy, the types of service available to them, and the amount of relocation assistance 6enef its for which they may be eligible. (Payments will be Lhose established 6y State and Federal guidelines.) City staff and consultants will be available to answer questions and provide information, and 6y their early involvement to see that relocation proceeds with a minimum of hardship. • • _ " ., • RESOLUTIOI NO.-P--3-28=1R - ~.. R RESOLUTION OF ?HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES AP10 SELECTING PROJECTS FOR PRELIMINARY FUNDING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRRNT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1965/86. WHEREAS, The City of Rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement City under the regulations governing the Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, Lhe City Staff has received proposals far projects and programs from various organizations in the Community; and WHEREAS, the City Sta" has conducted a needs assessment to detemine program eligibility and needs; and WHEREAS, the City released a Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives indicating in priority order all programs and projects submitted • for Block Grant funding in the next program year; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a Legally noticed public hearing in order to give the public an opportunity to respond to staff recommendations for program funding and to put forth for Council consideration recommendations of their Own; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heard public testimony and received all public input regarding the City's Community Development Block Grant Program for the next program year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby take the fallowing actions: A. Adopt the Relocation Assistance Policy. 8. Determine that operation of the Housing Rehabilitation program in the flood plain is the most practical and desirable of the alternatives, and the proposed mitigation measures are sufficient. C. Select for preliminary funding the following projects and programs to be funded out of the City's Community Development Block Grant award: r `- 7 City Council Resolution P-3-20-1R Page ~2 Project/P ro4ram Amount 1. Housing Rehabilitation S 80,000 2. North Town Park (development) (2nd Year Funding) 3. North Town Streets (Area I) (2nd Year funding) 4. Local Costs/Program Implementation a. Future Projects S 10,000 b. Contracts and Administration S 26,600 c. Programs Management S 51,000 d. Fair Housing Services S 7,000 5. Contingency TOTAL 473,000 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor Bever y A. Authelet, City C erk L • L J • CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAbfONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 20, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 84-2 ~ ~~cn.szoti C9 ~~ i ~ ~ ~i m t~~i !r ~_ ~ iiZ I9T7 Attached for Council action are a series of resolutions required to complete the formation of the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District. Key among these actions are: o Approval of Engineer's Final Report and Assessments o Award of the Construction Contract o Rccept ante of bond bids and authorization of the issuance of bonds o Approval of City contribution You will recall that the City and Co!!~ty were significant participants in the proposed program and that any savings in construction and bond bids would o0 towards reduction of those contributions. Assessments as noticed for the public hearing have remained the same. I am happy to report that favorable construction and bond bids have resulted in a savings of over $200,000. This reduction places the City contribution, remaining at approximately 5450,000, within the range of our original estimate at the time of abandonment of District 82-2. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Sealed bids for the shove referenced project were opened in the office of the City Clerk on Tuesday, March 7, 1985, at 10:00 am. The lowest, responsible bidder is Donald Hubbs, Inc., 0.8.A. Jesse Hubbs and Sons, Inc. Proposals were submitted by; Donald Hubbs, Inc. 51,928,190.00 KEC Co. 52,073,511.00 E. L. Yeager 52,130,089.00 Riverside Construction 52,144,980.00 Brutoco E2, 179,980.00 Colich-Falcon 52,188.360.00 Kruse Construction 52,798,575.00 U ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 52,102,984.00 A detailed bid summary is attached for your information. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 84-2 March 20, 1985 Page 2 • You should be aware that the low bidder is a second cousin of the City Engineer but that there is no financial relationship existent and both the City Attorney and Bond Counsel find no conflict of interest. RECONtl€NDATION It is recommended that Council execute the resolution awarding the contract for the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 84-2 to Donald Hubbs, Inc., OBA Jesse Hubbs and Sons, Inc. of Rialto, California, as the lowest, responsible bidder, for the amount of 81,928,190.00 plus 5X contingency. The total amount of the contract not-to-exceed S?,024,600.00. BOND BIDS Bond bids were received from two underwriters. The results were as follows: Discount M. L. Siern and Co. 9.501% 5% Stone and Youngberg 9.6048% 5% Burr Wilson 9.105% 5X 1'he interest rate was very favorable and the 5% discount was well below the estimated 7.5%. • To lend perspective, if the homes were required to pay a fee, they would likely pay 13% to 15% interest on that fee for a 30-year perf od rather than the 9.5X for 15 years provided by the bond sale and assessments. This method of financing has distinct advantages on developfng property. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council adopt the resolution accepting proposals and making award for sale of bonds to the lowest, qualified bidder, M. L. Stern and Co. at anet-effective rate of 9.501%. CONCLUSION: Attached for the Council's information is the previous staff report on this item, the construction bid summary, the three bond bids and the Order of Procedure for the public hearing. At the date of this report, no protest has been received against formation of the District. Staff recommends that Council take the appropriate actions to proceed with the project and approve the City contribution to be appropriated from the Drainage Fee and Systems Development Fund, Respectfully submitted, ~.~~~~~ ~ L H:.S a Attachments A ORDER a PROCEDURE un a RRNCNO NCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 80-2 (AL TA LONA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) DATE a PUBLIC HEARING: MARLN 20, 1985 PUBLIC HEAAI NG HEARING REOUTA EO PUR SVANT TO iNE 'NUN IC IPAL IMPROVEMENT FOR CONSIDERATION : ACi a 1913". MAYOR: Announce that this 15 the HAN! ono place Hxeo for the p utA is hearing on protests pr able;bons to the Resolution of Intention, En95neer~s "Report' aM all other matters r elat lnq to ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 8A-2 (Q TA IOMA C NANNEL IMPROVEMENTS). • CITY LLERK: Announce that notice of Nearing has been given In fne manner aM form as regplrM by law, aM to at the follows np of Ytoavits ere on it le: - [erttflcate of 'rostina Streets - [ertlflcate u/ Mailing Notice aM Filing AOUpadry Map - A/f ioavit of Publication M Not 1;e of improvement - ARloavit o/ Publication of Notice Invit lrg Se al eo BSOs - gifitlavit of Posting Notice Inviting Seal eo Bfos STAFF; Eapla in purpose, scope ono urger of pr oceo ure for Public Near ings. STAFF: - Explain general nature, locet tan aM eaten[ al She proposed works of improvement aM bounea ri es of the Assessment Ci str act. - Present aM summarl xe `A eport• pursuant to the provlslons a/ the "MUn lcipal Improremm~t Act W 1913", cpnsistl nq o/ the followt ng: a. Plana: b. Spec lllcat ions: ;. gssessment Aall; tl. Assessment Diaoram: e. Desc ri pt lon of the works o/ Improvement. - 6oia in nethotl ana formula p/ assess~rene spreatl; - Revlew construction bias race ivee - Make recamnentletlon at to sale of bpntls STAFF; Report on nueAer (%) of protests re<eivee aM announce - that cop les nave been dellve ree to each nemner of the leglslati ve booy. • ENO a STAFF flEPORT - OPEN FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION ~- ORDER OF PROCEOVRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGN ASSESSMENT OISTR ICT N0. Ba.2 (AL TA LOMI CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) PAGE TNO GATE OF PUBLIC NEARING: NHRCN 20, 1985 MAYOA: FSrst, ask to hear tram [nose who have /sled written protests against the pr oceed ings. Next, ask to near tram anyone else who wlsnes to speak against E~ improvement, the Assessment District, or the me thou or spread. Tn_n, ask to near from anyone Mio wishes [p speak in favor of the pr pceedings. STAFF: Report pn final percentage (%) of protests race lved. CITY COUNCIL: By Motion, deQare Public Henri ng CIOBED. • IF 7NE LEGISLATIVE BOBY NISNES i0 PROCEED: CITY COUNCIL: Wopt RESOLUTION OVERRVL ING ANO OENYI NG PROTESTS: To h adapte0 if am protests, oral or written, hove Deen race ived. CITY LOUNC IL: adopt AESOL UTION APPRDYI NG CONTRIBUTION: ih is is the formal a<[ion approving the cantr In utipn, CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION CONE IRM IIIG gSSESSMENTS; IDis Aesa lut ion orders the work and confirms the assessments. CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION AUTNIX(I Z ING ISSUANCE OF BONGS: Thfs 0.esplutlon out norizes the issuance of bonds fa finance the tmpr ovements. CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLbT10N AMAR DING CONSTRVLTION CONTRACT: The WopHOn of tots Resolut'pn awards the cons tract Tan contract to the lowest responsible bidder. CITY COUNCIL Adpp[ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FOR 7NE SALE OF BONGS: This Resolution ec<ep is the proposal /or Me :ale W Band: to finance the improvements. • s a • i 1 r • DATE: February 6, 1985 STAFF REPORT v~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hub6 s, City Engineer SUBJECT: ALTA LOMA CHANNEL ASS ESShIE NT DISTRICT 94-2 \J BACKGROU"!D 3 ~~'. l _ ^' ~' ~~~J r 19Tr At±ached for Council action are a number of resolutions required to initiate the formation process for the revised Alta Loma Channel Assessment District. Key actions include preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report, authorization to solicit construction and bond bids and the setting the public hearing for March 20, 1985. OISTRICT 30 U`1DARY The District boundaries are delineated on the attached area map and included in a urger scale map attached to the Engineer's Report. The boundary encompasses only those lands northerly of the Alta Loma Basins tributary to the Alta Loma Channel project which have previously received development approvals of some type. The current boundary differs from the most recent revisions (see attached Staff Reports) by exclusion of tracts southerly of Alta Loma Basins and the exclusion of the Church properties located at the northeast corner of Archibald and 'dilson Avenues. Those properties southerly of the basin have been required to install significant interim protection measures and will pay ordinary drainage fees. It was felt further ohligat ion would have been inequitable. The Church property subsequent to our previous hearings has begun construction and paid drainage fees which will be contributed to the project. PETITIONS RECEIVED The current District is comprised of 225 acres of which 80`.6 is contained in tracts owned by Dick Scott, Inc., The Anden Group, and Crismar Deve iopment Corporation. We have received petitions from each of these parties consenting to the District and waiving requirements for a Debt Report. One of your actions will be to accept these petitions by Resolution. The remaining property owners are aware of the District and with two exceptions, have not voiced objections. The two questionable properties are associated with Philo Biane. Mr. Biane in the past parceled his property and sold a portion on which a tentative tract map has been filed. Both of these approvals conditioned participation in the Assessment District. It should be noted that Drainage Fees will be waived upon approval of the District. ~ t CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 84-2 February 6, 1985 Page 2 ESTIMATES Ai10 ASSESSMENTS The Distri c# cost estimate is delineated in the Engineer's Report and totals 53,055,850. As currently structured, the District and bond sale will fund 51,728,512, the County will fund $437,559 and the City will contribute 5889,780. Included in the City contribution is the contingency fund of 595,027 and the bond reserve fund of 5172,851. The City will retain the reserve fund in trust for debt service until termination of the District. We will be ab ie to expend interest on that fund in the administration of the District. Of the remaining City funds, 5275,763 will be assigned to construction of the channel crossings at Hillside Road and Wilson Avenue and to the improvement of Hermosa Avenue at the Alta Loma Basins. These projects are included in this year's budget to be funded with Systems Development funds. Of the remaining incidental costs of 5346,139, approximately 5254,000 has already been expended from the Cr ainage Fee fund on Engineering for the project. • The District amount to bond of 51,728,512 results is the same assessment as previously noticed under Rssessment District 82-2. This amount will remain fixed upon receipt of bids. Any increase or decrease in costs would be reflected in the City and County portions of the project. The table below • summarizes the previous information: ALTA LOh1A CHANNEL COST Sl'MMARY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY COUNTY TOTAL 51,728,512 5889,780 5437,559 53,055,851 COST ANALYSIS CITY CONTR IBUTI O.i 1. Hillside Rd., Wilson Ave., Hermosa Ave. 2. Incidental Engineering 3. Reserve Fund (Loan) 4. Construction Contingency Fund TOTAL FUND EXP EN OED TO DATE BALANCE FUNDING SOURCES SYSTEM DEVELOPhiE NT AND STORM GRAIN FUNDS COUNTY CONTRIBUTION 1. Hermosa Equalizer Culvert 2. Construction Administration, Inspection, Survey, etc TOTAL 5275,763 5346,139 5172,851 595 027 $889, 8 5254 000 635, 80 5212,559 • 522000_ S ~~ ~- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 84-2 February 6, 1995 • Page 3 PRO,]ECT IMPACT The proposed project will provide drainage and flood protection for the properties within the Oi strict boundary, provide safe improved road crossings and reduce flows in Hermosa Avenue in normal storms. The project by no means fully mitigates the potential impact of future develepment tributary to Hermosa Avenue. To further address this issue, we will be proposing that further development participate in completion of the original project through payment of fees and further excavacation of the Alta Lama Basins. These policies will return to the Council with Lhe Storm Dain tlaster Plan and fee revisions in the near future. PRD.IECT SCHEDULE o City Council authorization to bid and to form Assessment District 84-2 - February 6, 1985 o Opening of construction bids - March 7, 1985 o Second Council meeting, conffrmat ion of assessments and final protest hearing/award bids - March 20, 1985 . o End of cash collection - April 21, 1985 o Date of the ponds - May 2, 1985 o Closing - May 9, 1985 o Start of construction - May 9, 985 o Completion of construction plus or minus - February 1986. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends proceeding with the District and adoption of the necessary resolutions. Respectfully submitY9~1, ri ` /~ ~~~~ LBH:j Attachments EXCL.NPEO Donaltl G. King and Associates r project Area Legend: R'opoaed Assessment Dfshfcy 84-2 fe- ~~~ Roposed Dbtrky l3ouWSry _~~SY Figure No. i~ A"L2 ~ I - . ;: ;' _~•-~;',-~~ ~ ,NEW DEBRIS BASIN CHANNEL ~ ~ ~ ° •"_ ' " u•ui•uw: (BASIN NO. 3 ) ' AND EXCAVATION '-'•IMPROVEMENTS ~.` I n :-_: . NEW CULVERT AND ' _xr---~~wug/~u~~ ~ ~ - 'STREiE~~ IM7PROVEI MENTS _-'~==.t5 I- NEW ~~/r ~ CHANNEL `STORM DRAINS ~ IMPgOVEMENTS .~~ # j%~' .--.- ~ . PO°°••d NEW EOUALR!<R '~ = :~;` ~~~ ~ - ~,; CUIVERTB STREET _ !y ,,~-. ~ ~ . ~_. ~IMPROVEMENTSI ~ ~ ~! : I' l __~ a- "Q~ ^~C _. '".~_;` ~_ _ _ _ NO N OUTLET PIPE -~ __ r-_ 1 T ---- -r- NENL __iy '._tc ?P~!r3:_°-~.. ~ '~ r '~~' ~ N S_PILLWAV-X: ~~`-,;:~.1:~~_ ~::. _~ie II. Paae i4 project Camoo~ents 4 Oonald G. King and Associates Flgut! No. • DID FONM FOR t915 ptT BONDS 7m CJa 0371( mS Q' N/IDD OGV4it 18d:C ~1Le 1~0 ptc 0}YJS L~ ®/ ~~ Oa®sa. a1i •^'^" 917X1 SUI: Rtpttml 4r Iapweatt Bvtb A:satt DISCIR Ib. BFZ (AlLla Floot OnROI Oertel), the m !~K ft,7A,512 \J N satoctLtm tdm all Ottm and oaaunw of yar Poum of 5138 cf 7xpcavaa3G Burk, leQovamis Bad pet of 1915. Asss9re~c Dlstrlcx !b. Di-2 maE Fe0ctory 6, 19"j, w scT~t @ tallwLg 01d tra 7~rvvamrt Bunls (L>ocove~i Bvd pct of 79151 w 4 OateO MaY 2. 7985, a 17. 31st by suer itw1t9t1on at Ce asaeS7lRafL roll am Q1a~, Wrlever ID later, v;rh mtneas pgaDle Jsraery 2, 19fA ard Qetml'trr sdtrFpnl ly m Janmry 2 and July 2: ~611t11 ttDC ]NIfl~4' Bp1£ LR6 NAtIRDC IN121a5f N1JE -~- ty,; 1987 0. ;" i t995 9-C } 19® 9.'~ f 196 9.^0 -b 7993 9~'B } 1997 9. v0 f 19rP 9.-0 S 19~ 9.-- S 1431 e.'" f 1999 ~:'-f 7992 a.,0 f ZI%A -~-s 1993 9.z0 S -- 1,6i2,086.i0 11! vlll pey 95 S far a total O[ S Mtcfl L^ a Eismnt/tamaimo( SB6,ii5.60 f1m tte St,'~,512 per valor, pim atct+aea interest m mte of mlivery. As a mcn:r m UIICf>mtim, tte 1n4teat ~; in acmcm~ KM Ve aeove 010, is: Gams L~4rac Cg6C f 1,607,051.69 D39romV{3tlY,ttx S 86,:2'.60 11JGLL tEl'INID&ST CjA' S .5s~89.r9 FSfecuce Net interesx Bate 9.fi0i6 L 'Wa offer li aC,}.et m a aaclsfattay legal oplrum !ry F. KarYavle Umm, Inc., Paricro SnID Fe, Callfomfa, epprov7.7G ae valtoiry aC tte Bm69, ac you e~erse. Flelostl trrtln fs a CSVders or C¢r[ilftd rhek 1n tm mwrz of SiS.ODJ ropOle b ne o,aer of ve (9T ~ AAt9]O QGl4tA NLLt0 ve ceµesc rv reo:nee prtsR+c1Y >n ae event ce are me 11! aacQss161 OSOOer, OVIe[n.Y to 0; reraf.e7 a~E applic4 a~uisc ne pvrclage prim o.` trc ~~. au: rua u mae m10,}ect m tre mdfuau lv 3. ;~~~~9~c ue /v~ ss~e or ws eie i:r «•, (iirol 1~~ID~1 ODer Nesbit of tfe 5yrdltw@ ace: ~1': D1re: ,arc^. 1i, 198i 10 ~* N_° 24629826 9ECUFCNATIONAL BANK anw~wuarwrwrct 1WtCH 6, 1985 ~a,~rne wmnumaui.o. rm.xgoa a aw,r ••CIIY OF BAN<NO GVOp910NOM w e e w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w TMR0,000.00 SPM6~'~:~d~Qc7~J'gra ~- , x :~T:~a;;~;%..r: ~r; L. ,`fit.- ~J)~:t31ct-1.c. ~5 u.t-4.~.: r _ .,~.aa..... I a'2L629A 26• ~:p22000043G034~ae 240p• .,., --.-- ,.,.., """'~ a y BI^ FORM FOR 1915 ACT BONGS • 'ID: CCIaS pF}1< CJ1Y U' RAIOO QCMIIt'd g~C Pose1Le R®o Poet O6IQ PoA 8A 19rh: Off, nr'r^^'- 917A IOt: Ptcp®1 to I4~t BiLLa Assert OLS4'let tb. B42 ^ (/,ttai® FlsOtl ~tol Gravel), tbt >a E»Be0 f1,7®,512 7 In atm~roe .nv: all reran artl mafinass of yaa tbnn of Sa:e of ;groveoet: SmCs, Ie{rovem:t 9vtl Act at 1915. Aaessamt C1SCiet tb. 84-2 6~atl Fepnery o. 1935. w sux'~: tte fOl:a'srg biC fs 7oQrovenart datls (LTmv~t Bvo Ace of 19151 tp 5e ~te1 !ay 2, tom:, m IIe 31st my a[rer tKOC1Nnm of tle avesm>Pnt roll any dlaga~, vtlahever :s laver, '_i'.: inrewsC Payable Javsr/ E, 19fti artl ffeteai'rer seafarruo l:y m Ja~:er/ 2 a~t1 11y 2: BNFi MRIISIIIC BJa7831' MATE B76 MATI1iBC III' RATE tan e 1jr; ~9- 1¢1 G 1955 ~ t9~ F 1?b t9c5 tai Ao tai i 1993 7 t 199 a 19a s t9¢ G 2Sli ~ Si .. 795; L 1,14$0/6va lie wll l pay QS S far a tcpl of S vNC`. is a d:xrnnc/p~e2 cf 3 K. 4.15, G ftrID rte 51,72552 Lsr vela, plus arsr~ rntenst ID aaaa Y Gelrvery. Asa ®trr W 1r.'a;RL'm, Ce uA:est Cr5'y In aGAtr'd~lm v1C V:¢ shave bu, is: Crm~s In>Prast Cost a 1 SGl, iN.O q D1scaA:v Frecisr. S b{ Yir: Lo 1OfAL to L'f~'rS^ TA' E~Z49 Eftecn~e tax Iosrest Pare A Ttus aCer ss sub;,ect m a satLeiacrgy 1~1 oplrum :n' F. Marxrie Brhr, IIc., 4ar.~a Fe, Cdllfarma, app~'vL'g- me vallClty c; tre BxiGS, at your eF,erse. 8iclosh letef ^. is a ~rler's or Cern::~ c':eu1 rn tfe mw'~c of 515,~t FByable 4 _`e c:~' I oI tze CC1Y 6 R/117D OG1lII1tA, v0um ve :earyest be acurAV pr~:lY N be event w are z: rle simessCUl buffer, avervue to Ce ieIDS+c'z artl eppiled agauat rte pu[cue Prcae ai ten Bs6s. 'Bus b1C is tede actr_t w 4e cCrtllnm, (L' arty) sYCn m me reverse sltl' of 4.:s :-- --.,- 1 9~tretl ty: He. L. SaE~,d tG. (FL ~i A over Mevhers of rre syrrsm~ are: .ti-~ ~a(,e~~u~<w v. P• Sn1r4 8,4wc4 Tr. 1fMn0.ii, M:~ -! Iww.rena-~. Mnuw6YY ' • N.roar: ®ce: 3Il y/fir 1~ t o . t..„~,. ~ F{~ pnt1nMpta1Bne ~ N°_ 774547 ~~ .~. ~o~~.,.ooe ari« soon ~,....,.,m a:.a MM/sMM Henn ea~w+ica, c0 a:0oz C88h18IS C118Ck - B3/W ,e. , ~:~Ai6 e••e 3-I3-es F„st -a ' BB •is uv J~d I5,0001oT^OOCi S . a ro*ve .wCI1Y OF RANCHO COCARONGA•• a.oen or ~ 111 e~rnone ' eo ruu ~ e'tl 7745477e• is 22tltlO23&:137O~s9B ~45Ou 11 B5M1]8 70: • Kai: • C71T CIDK CIIY ~ RANCH7 CiG4Qir1 ADC BaeelLe Road Pmt Ofllne B;a BW Rarbd qa~, n.Itr ~~ 91730 Rope®i >2t~ L~rt Bards Aesaeszxrt District Ib. 81.2 U1>elaB Fl.aod Osrnol Charnel), Nat m I~oeed (1,718,512 In eocaetierne vim all tenor ard cmdlttau: of yar Pbtace of ale of Lnprov®er2 Bm Iadaovesmt Bind Act of 1915. Ae.9r~~t District No. Bt-2 dated Febnary 6, 1985, ve sutr the follovlrlg D1d for Improv~t Bads (Imprvv~t Bad Act of 1915) w re datai May 2, 19 or the 31st day after recortlaum of the aeseasment roll arts diagram, vhia>Ewer Ss laver, r. interest peyaDle Jartery 2, 1986 and ttereatler eaniammnl ly m Jansry 2 and July 2: 6~ MA71R11C II®~ RATE B;TZS MICIIRIIG INID~sI' RAZE ~~ ~ 1991 o,1i 193/ 0 ; n % 1995 , c n % 1988 0 ; n % 1996 0 : n % 1983 n '- % 1937 n_-' % 1990 0 og % 1998 a_7s % 1991 ~o„_~~ % 1999 n :n % 19y? o ~c % 2OW a nn % 1993 a , ; % Ye viii pay 95 % foC a total of $ 1,542, OA7. 1CIiCt113 a dlatgllt/prem11J11 of $ Afi.G25. fray rte $1,728,512 par' valor, plus accrued Snterest to dove of delivey. As a matter 1nt'ana3tim, The SnRreat cost, 3n acoond3rce vim the above b1d, is: Gn7es Interest Cost $yy~e 7n7 n~,t/~va a aF :~s TDrnc riEr rrrmusr oar $ , ; ; ~ ~ ,~ Effective Net Interest Rate o. ;n; % ibis offer is subiect to a satisfactory legal opwm by F. Merxavle B[v n, Irlc., Fiancro S~nti: Fe, Cslifornia, approving the validity of tre Binds, at your expense. thclosed herein is a (hsnier's or Certified Gterlc Sn the arrant mf $15,000 payable W tie order cY Ve CC1Y Cf RAtI}D CIGPQdYi, vhlrh Me request 6e ret+yrled ptvv~tly in Ve event ne are ro~ the arccessfUl bidder, Omervlse to be remired and applied against Lhe purrlsae price of tr lids. This Did Ss made sub,)ect w rte arditta>s (if arty) etn~ m the reverse side o1' this bid i'ort 511h-itted by: BI RR, WILSO:J S CO., LXC Dyer Pl.mbers of fiE Syrdi®te one; 2hem~as >resplfm ieh Vice Pres iJenC Nlmber: W1p: 71r:r~h I1, 19A5 10 HID FORM FOR 1915 AC7.' BONDS sue. R88cR888E88 888888€@~~€^ R R@8888888 i , ~ , • ~8@~S8€~8~~8~88SQEvSB<,`~c R€€~ s o°~~° . . ` =1 cV'v'~-~v'~~`.~cRc€E€88ccS °. R'~'c•°~Rece8o8~c~ _.. . z~~~_..-~. ~. C~SmcB^oa ~. cERc88c€8€8888€5888€€88888€R8 RS8 85~ € a ~ € c ° ~BP 888 °a £R8° ~88 ve°€S€~ e~8 a '~588S,R~°€8R°r8o€a8~8a8m8a8SRe 'm ~~~~mr,~,. 'c i ~888888888~€°0€€~€€€8o8€88R8c°88€88 ~8~~~~£Ra ~o~~e~~~~Rsa~~~~ oe~~'~°o~€Q . , €=~~ ati a °' .- - e-~ ~, m eR°8RRR8888R8a<€R8~8F.8~€~8~5e . . $ .Q S .g .g . m~_.~~~e .....nduoimmdm o .-. ~., r .~ w r, ~.. ~, • a SSR8€888888888888€€RRRRBRRRRo8888 a ~ ~~€~eoe~~~°~°oo~d&~~v~S~B€~em°oa°fi € .-..a~aa_m~.:.:^^ao~rSee~N ~, mom ~ °8$888888 °c oomRN8e8RR68R°o ~° m...~~~ea ~" S ~~~ N o 0 Q ~8RR8R8€°o 8888 °088888R88R8SRR8888885 ~o$~o~€a°g~~g€o~~$~z<~BSo~gogss~e~ ~83~~s~SRR88~RRSS<SesaB°8°8684 e "~~`- 6 a tiEj~E^OOOOOO ~CU000OCR~O~R~OVC~(~On~mB O N + rv vo m 6 ~^ W N T>CNI. +t R~%~ i n CSr~~~ pia pF FOUtiuUV\mT Il N~mmmmm ~tC ~¢E F .-C~^~ u wKC gv~rt~' v~9 NNpN GN S.ba fN000UU~pTeOi~a~~cVCUCVCVOO ~~CCG •CL~C rVrOLL6WWCV¢6o<OV Vr~U¢UCV6mKmROCUCY2 ~'r n nqP~~^~^^^^^^NNNNNNryNNNn(~'I~n ~'r~ €€€€€€@€€5€€€88cc888€ccc@88€€€,E€€€€€ a €~n~u°~°c~~M~c c.ccc~v~€o€~anec~`4v e~F~aa~€.€ - 55€€€€€€€55888€€€,:€€€5€€€88€€€~8€V " r- .~. ~ ~~ ~C m .~ <nn~m_.~~y €55€€88888€€€8€€€€€88€88€€€858€€€€€8 8 4 ~/ P €€88888888588€58€€~€€€5€5€888€5v€€~ €€8€85€5€€€€€€€~€€€8€858888€€8€€€€88 8 ~e€8me~€~.~d~e `': ~~`~vS~~~N€~g.ea~4 a,o~e~ J€€€€€€€€€€€€5€€585V888€88888888~88~ '. ~ 88€€5€8€-5€85€€€€€€8S€€S€€€€€885€8€~ ~ qq 'ccccc~mo e.Jc 'o c~ocd .. e e.. oo _ ,... ,.~,., c '~ m ~$5€55€€€€€8€888888V888888888€€5/.8€~ .................................... ¢ccc°c_- "I .- 88€5€88888€888€5€€€€€€€€€€€€°€€€€€€8 8 ~g$eesvens;^°€~~~s°°a~~g°°sa=m~~me€R88 a ~~ Nm ~ ..~ ~e & .d€€8°°€€85€€888 ~°88°°°°~.°o°°°°°°88°°°°8888h88~ [~" E E E E .. .. w ~ r .s p J~ c vu oe~~~` oo-ccoooc m ~, o00 oodoo .z° '~ u u' A¢us¢ "~ " ° g ~ i,. • . ~, a ~mn ~~~~. c~~'=~ u~ u ` uu uum`.gt q~ P ~~p m~ ? TV VUtiuVUVIUVVVU~mmU ~C aAy mJJJ ~ N T ¢¢¢ ¢¢¢¢¢¢ [ y y R R ' ga °S$Sg>~~~~E ~y ` e ~~i•n / ~ j ~j N OO . i• . x ~ p r y i~i6am~~•Imnmm nlNNZUV~vdim ~N VSO V.~-~.~ a7»r[--.Y l ~r p F m bWb mvVVVVIC NNbNV ~ ¢ V ~ n~rNh n ~ n ~ 0< U u~ ~ON r i V v i m l V 'f . r • i .-888888€888888888€8€8E€€@€S.S€€€885 mJIJ_sam Ss~~58585~'^5"Se8484548o5a o '^ ~8888885588~888,888855555555€888888 g~€~s~~~g~€~~NPs~=ma~e~€P~~gnm~~~~R a mQm_ .. _ ~888858~8888888e8o8°.8~8~848o5r -~~~ .. ..~-ti a -_ ~ _ .. ~, ~$ ~ ~° .g 3 a E J ~8€$88°eo8°oo °oe's8885€5 °o x°85888°o 88SSS8 ~o~~°s~S~~,~~°s °sooo°s°°€o~°sss&s~~~~$g~~g s a ....... ................. ....... r88S888888888884848°8°84848484 N 6 O n v EEEE .EgJEI°o`°88~°0~8 °8 °od ^o OOOOCe p oticogcm g<8v838m~ S 2S j Clr-~O _ ]OS t ~2-~n cCl 2 _ _ _~~ ~J ~ 6 F W a`o ~e'v.n ln~c n°°~ _- -- ..¢¢.. N _~~Hm wiA ~S c' ..A nnm o.a ctl~c-c=~`--.`.: ~.`_c-.€'u _ ~S~.a WUCU a"ioa"ou u'.". isucu`n'm a'a~$Q~d ~: ~~, - ai E~ 5€€€~,€€€€€€€€;€€€€€s€€€€€€€,€~€~€,€0€€€ e t~ µ` ~ '€€85€€8888€€88888€.:,€€€€888€88888,8, wF~ ~..~,,,.crrec~~.-u.eF~NBr~^J~° ~S€BJCa ~L~' t ~~ 8€885€08€68€800€888€€0888€08€~08€858 ~a E~~~°a°°¢QOeBe°8$8€€€s~~€0o~~mSee5~m8 .i m ~€8€~°€€808€.888€€€88,:8808€5°~€°8°08°0,.; «•~ Y ^" ~.. ~ ~PmoB£€oSS~€"`"'AN'~~.°'Y",=.--°8,'"-~'.°GrJ 8888888888€88888888888888588888€8€88 8 ~ ooococooooco~oe eg€g gggcSm~~snou c o ' $ c Qa i ° . $o€€°o °o,°~o~omme~ rl n ~ 888888$8888888€8~888888858008N88~ ad d~ ~~ ~ J do~ m °Saa°88oa~ ~88~~°~€8~88o~ 8 .. .. °a~_~~__ F 'E ,:~2q§ g€Q °e ervmc~~dn€mmo r^En'.°~~8~N~., -peNjee~ .. Fz W ~i .. ~ ,. `. n odu ,_ , '.'"r .c o ym ° rv • ~. dv cc o ~ N ~ Y QQ o p 6t9 UG' y C¢6 ++d[ 8 G ~ ~ 1. N~ cc 1 v innJ~ln N~ ~C '1 L Y ~mJJ`0FY TuuuVU mc ~ Y y ¢ pp KC22KCCKO ? G n6C "i ~" ~° °' ° i uE ~ " ~ eo c ' [5 . . .. - .. . N ~i .. ~ . 8c. ~ u ~T y o muu7a rvrvi~ ~~i nn~° i .~ ' ~ °v ai :ee~ 'riii~i~~. ° ennn n v . m c i c ~ m< o voeva °,n~r n~~rv'~irN$'m ee~uem~$ n.~m~m,.°,oav ~~ ^ n RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING AND DENVI NG PROTESTS AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHD COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has, by Resolution, declared its intention to order the construction of certain public works of improvement, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", be inq Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 (ALTA LOMq CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"): and, WHEREAS, certain owners of Drope rty 1i a61e to be assessed for improvements have Filed written protests or objections and delivered the same to the City Clerk not later than the hour Set for hearing such objections; and WHEREAS, at the time set for said Public Hearing, all protests and objections were duly heard and considered, and all matters as to the method and formula of the assessment spread and the determination as to whether or not the property did receive a benefit and whether the assessments were apportioned in accordance to benefit were heard and considered. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the public hearing on the Assessment District is hereby closed. SECTION 3. that all protests and objections of every kind and nature be, and the same hereby are, overruled and denied, and it is further determined that said protests and oh,iect ions are made by the owners of less than one-half (1/2) of the area of property to 6e assessed for said improvements within said Assessment District. SECTION 4. That is hereby further determined that all properties within the bounda- ries of the Assessment District receive a local and direct benefit from the works df improvement as Droposed for said Assessment District, and it 1s hereby further determined and declared that all assessable costs an4 expenses have been apport Toned and spread aver the properties within the boundaries of the Assessment District in direct proportion to the bene- fits received thereby. SECTION 5. That the Engtneer'z method of spread and apportionment of all costs hereby approved and adopted as being a correct and proper apportfon~ and distribution of all assessable costs for these vrorks of improvement. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of _ 19A5. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTEST: Y L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA r~ L • STRTE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council, approved an ski gnedTiy the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the meeting of said City Council held on the day of T985, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS EXECUTED this day of , 1965, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Y L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STRTE OF CALIFORNIA [SEAL] • RESOLUTION N0. ~ "- ~ -' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND PROVIDING FOR CONTRIBUTION TO PAY CERTAIN COSTS AND EXPENSES IN AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. NHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has, by Resolu- tion, declared its intention to authorize the construction of certain works of improve- ment pursuant to the terms and prov isf ons of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 (ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and, MHEREAS, the City Council is desirous at this time of providing a contribution to pay a portion of the costs and expenses of the work and proceedings: antl, HH ER EAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10205 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, a contr iD ut ion may be provided to pay a portion of the costs and expenses at any time prior to the conf frmat ion of the proceedings on said • Rssessment District. NON, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2. That the appropriation of the monies as set forth as a contribution in the Engineer's "Report" as herein presented relating to the above referenced Assessment District is hereby approved and authorized. Said contriDut ion shall be used to pay for the items of work as set forth in said Engineer's "Report" and the appropriation shall be from the funds as indicated therein. SECTION 3. That said contribution is authorized pursuant to Section 10205 of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of _ 1985. ATTEST: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq STATE OF CALIFORNIA I Y CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council, approved a signe y the Mayor, and attested 6y the City Lle rk, all at the meeting of said City Council held on the day of ~ 1985, and that the same was passed and adopted 6y tie following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBEkS ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS EKECUTED this _ day of 1985, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA [SEAL) • • RESOWTION N0. ~ .; - •, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS MODE, TOGETHER WITN APPURTENANCES, AND APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S "REPORT" WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, did, on the 6th day of February, 1965, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 85-39, for the construction of certain public works of improvement, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, including acqutsitfon where appropriate, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 (ALTA COMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution of Intention, a "Report", as therein provided, was presented, considered and approved; and, WHEREAS, said "Report", as preliminarily approved, contained all the matters and items called for by law and as pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improve- . ment Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, including the following: 1. Plans and sDecffications of the proposed improvements; 2. Estimate of cast; 3. Diagram of Assessment District; 4. An assessment according to benefits; 5. A description of the works of improvement. and, WHEREAS, all protests have been heard and considered, and a full hearing has been given, all in the manner provided by law; and, WHEREAS, notices of said hearing were duly and regularly posted, mailed and published in the time, form and manner requfred by law and as evidenced by affidavits on file with the transcript of these proceedings; and, WHEREAS, the owners of one-half (1/2) of the area assessed for the cost of the pro- - jest dfd not file written protests against the said proposed improvements and acqui- sition, where appropriate, and this City Council did, after providing a full hearing, overrule and deny all protests and objections; and, WHEREAS, the assessment roll has been updated since the preliminary approval by this legislative body; and, WHEREAS, this City Council is now satisfied with the assessment and all matters con- tafned in the "Report" as now submitted. ~~J NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: • SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the "Report", consisting of the assessment and diagram for the improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connec- tion therewith, including acquisition where appropriate, fs hereby confirmed. SECTION 3. That the public interest and convenience require the proposed improve- ments to be made, and therefore it is hereby ordered that the work to 6e done and improvements to be made, together with appurtenances and appur- tenant work in connection therewith, including acquisition where appro- priate, in said Assessment District, as set forth in the Resolution of Intention previously adopted and as set forth in the "Report" presentetl and considered, and as now submitted. SECTION 4. That the assessment contained in said "Report" is hereby levied upon the respective subdivisions of land in the Assessment Oistrict as set forth in said "Report". SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall forthwith deliver to the Supe rf ntendent of Streets the said assessment, together with the diagram attached thereto and made a part thereof, as confirmed, with his certificate of such confirmation attached and the date thereof; and that said Supe ri ntende~ of Streets shall then immediately record said diagram and assessment his Office in a suitable book to be kept for that purpose and attach thereto his certificate of the date of such recording. SECTION 6. That said Superintendent of Streets, upon the recording of said diagram and assessment, shall mail to each owner of real property within the Assessment District at his last known address, as the same appears on the tax roils of the County or on file in the Office of the Cfty Clerk, or to both addresses ff said address is not the same, or to General Delivery when no address so appears, a statement containing a designation by street number or other description of the property assessed sufficient to enable the owner to identify the same, the amount of the assessment, the time and place of payment thereof, the effect of failure to pay within such time, and a statement of the fact that bonds will be issued on unpaid assessments pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915". SECTION 7. That said Superintendent of Streets shall aiso give notice 6y publishing a copy of a notice of recording of assessment in the newspaper previously selected to publish all notices as provided by law, gf vi ng notice that said assessment has been recorded in his Office, and that all sums assessed thereon are due and payable immediately, and that the payment of said sums is to be made within thirty (30) days after the date of record- ing the assessment, which date shall be so stated in said notice, and of the fact that securities will be issued upon unpaid assessments. • SECTION 8. Upon confirmation of the assessments and recordation of the assessment _ roll and diagram, a Certified Copy of the assessment diagram shall be immediately filed in the Office of the County Recorder. Immediately thereafter, a copy of the notice of assessment shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder 1n the manner and form as set forth by law and specifically Section 3114 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 9. That the Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to es tab tish a special fund account to he known as the IMPROVEMENT FUND, and designated by the name of this Assessment Oistr ict, into which fund shalt be paid all payments to be received upon said assessment, and the Droceeds of the sale of bonds to be issued representing unpaid assessments. SECTION 10. That the Treasurer is hereby further authorized to es ta6lish a SPECIAL RESERVE FUND, into which the designated amount shall be transferred and held in trust for the bondholders and used to assist final discharge by any payment by property owners efth in the boundaries of the Assessment O istrict. APPROVED and ADOPTED this tlay of 1985. • ATTEST: L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIiY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA STATE OF CAL [FORNIA C__I STATE OF CAL IFORNlA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. was duly passed, approvetl and adopted 6y the City Council, approved and signed y the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the meeting of said City Council held on the day of -165, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: LOUNC IL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS EXECUTED this _ day of , 1965, at Rancho Cucamonga, California: Y L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA [SEAL] r 1 L~ _ ,. , • RESOLUTION N0. : - ~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE f SSUANCE OF BONDS PURSUANT TO THE "IMPROVEMENT BONG ACT OF 1915" WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL [FORNIR, has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upon lands within a special assessment district described in a Resolution of Intention previously adopted for said improvements, said special assessment District known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 (ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment Oistrfct"); and, WHEREAS, said proceedings providetl for the issuance of bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Lode of the State of California, and it is necessary to establish terms and provisions of such issuance; and, • WHEREAS, the final unpaid balance to assessment, as well as the denomination antl amounts to mature each year, cannot be determined until following the 30-day cash collection period after the recordation of said assessment; and, WHEREAS, there has now been presented for consideration by this legislative body an Information for Bidders Document containing information including but not limited to the Assessment District and the type of bonds, including terms and conditions thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Un aid Assessments. The treasurer shall, immediately upon the completion o the -day cos collection period, determine the assessments which are unpaid and the aggregate amount thereof as authorized by Section 8621 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 3. Registeretl Bonds. Said bonds shall be issuaDle only as fully registered o6~n s in t e nomination of E5,000, or any integral multiple thereof, e r.cept for one bond maturing in the first year of maturity, which shall include the amount by which the total issue exceeds the maximum integral multiple of E5,000 contained therein. SECTION 4. Oate of Bonds. All of said bonds shall be dated the 2nd day of May, 8 and nterest shall accrue from that date. SECTION 5. Maturit and Oenomination. The bonds shall be issued in serial form wi~ annua maturities on u y 2nd of every year succeeding the first ten (1 months after their date, until the whole is paid. The amount maturing each year shall be such as to °e;uit in approx ima cely equal annual debt service during the term of the issue as reflected by the interest rate and/or rates and principal amounts maturing in the respective years of maturity, and the Treasurer or designated Registrar shall, fmmediately upon completion of the cash collection period, prescribe the denomina- tions of the bonds, which shall be in convenient amounts, not necessarily equal, and shall further provide far their issuance and delivery. SECTION 6. Interest. Each bond shall be of a single maturity and shall bear inte- rest at the rate as set forth in the accepted bid proposal for safd bonds from the fnterest payment date next preceding the date on which ft is authenticated and registered, unless said bond is authenticated and registered as of an interest payment date, in which case it shall bear interest from said interest payment date, or unless said bond is authen- ticated and registered prior to the first interest payment date, in which case it shall bear interest from its date, until payment of its principal sum has been discharged. SECTION 7. Place of Pa nt. The principal and interest on the bonds shall De pay- s e in a u money of the United States of America at the office of the Treasurer, or such paying agent as may be designated by Resolution of the legislative body. Principal and interest on said bonds shall be paid by check or draft the registe red owner thereof at his address as it appears on the books of registration, or at such address as may have been filed with the Treasu- rer for that purpose, as of the 15th day immediately preceding said interest payment date. SECTION 8. Redemption. This bond, or a portion thereof if issued in a denomination greater tan E6,000, shall be sub,iect to redemption and payment in advance of maturity in increments of E6,000 as provided in Section 8768 of [he Streets and Highways Code, on the 2nd day of January or July in any year, by giving the notice provided fn said law to the registered owner thereof at his address as it appears on the books of registrat ton and by paying principal of and accrued interest on such redeemed amount, together with a premium equal to five percent (5X) of the redeemed prin- cfpal amount. If less than the entire bond is redeemed, the unredeemed portion shall be reissued to the registered owner thereof. SECTION 9. Transfer of Re istered Bonds. Any fully registered bond may, in accor- dance with its terms, transferred upon the books of registration required to be kept pursuant to the provisions of Section 11 by the owner in whose name it is registeretl, or by his duly authorized attorney or legal representative, upon surrender of such fully registered bond for registration of such transfer, accompanied by delivery of a written instrument or transfer in a form approved by the Treasurer and by the owner of said bonds, duly executed. • • The Treasurer shall require the payment by the bondholder requesting such transfer of any tax or other governmental charge required Lo be paid with respect to such transfer and such charges as provided for in the system of registration for registered debt obligations. No transfer of fully registered bonds shall be required to De made during the flf teen (15) days next preceding each interest payment date. SECTION 10. Exchange of Registered Bonds. Fully registered bonds may be exchanged at t~ie~Tice o t-lie~reasurer, or designated transfer agent/registrar, for a like aggregate principal amount of bonds of the same series, interest rate and maturity, sub,iect to the terms and conditions provided in the system of registration for registered debt obligations, including the payment of certain charges, if any, upon surrender and cancellation of this bond. Upon such transfer and exchange, a new registered bond or bonds of any authorized denomination or denom inatfons of the same maturity for the same aggregate principal amount wi it be issued to the transferee in exchange therefor. SECTION 11. Books of Registration. There shall be kept by the Treasurer sufficient ooks or the reg is[rat ion and transfer of the Donds and, upon presenta- tion for such purpose, the Treasurer shall, under such reasonable regu- lations as it may prescribe, register or transfer or cause to be regis- tered or transferred, on said register, bonds as hereinbefore provided. • SECTION 12. Execution of Bonds. The bonds shall be executed in facsimile by the reasurel~- ~ and y~the City Clerk, and the corporate seal shah be imprinted in facsimile on the bonds. The bands shall then be delivered to the transfer agent and registrar, for au then[ic ation and registra- tion. In case an officer who shall have signed or attested to any of the bones by facsimile or otherwise shall cease to be such officer before the authentication, delivery and issuance of the bonds, such bonds nevertheless may De authenticated, delivered and issued, and upon such authentication, delivery and issue, shall be as bi nd inq as though those who signed and attested the same had remained in office. SECTION 13. Authentication. Only such of the bonds as shall bear thereon a certift- cate--~~~ntication substantially in the form below, manually exe- cuted by the transfer agent and registrar, shall be valid or obligatory for any purpdse or entitled to the benefits of thfs Resolution, and such certificate of the transfer agent and registrar shall be conclusive evi- dence that the bonds so authenticated have been duly executed, authenti- cated and delivered hereunder, and are entitled to the benefits of this Resolution. FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION AND REGISTRATION This bond has been authenticated and registe red on BANK OF AMERICA NT 6 SA as Transfer Agent and Registrar By: SECTION 14. Negotiability, Reg istrat ion and Transfer of Bonds. The transfer of a• SECTION 15. Ownership of Bonds. The person in whose name any bond shall be regis- tered sha be deemed and regarded as the absolute owner thereof for all purposes, and payment of or on account of the principal and redempt io premium, if any, of any such bond, and the interest on any such bon shall be made only to or upon the order of the registered owner there or his legal representative. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to sati 5fy and discharge the liability upon such bond, includ- ing the redemption premium, if any, one interest thereon, to the extent of [he sum or sums so paid. bond may be registered only upon such books of registration upon surren- der thereof to the transfer agent and registrar, together with an assignment duly executed by the owner or hi: attorney or legal represen- tative, in satisfactory form. Upon any suth registration of transfer, a new bond or bonds shall be authenticated and delivered in exchange for such bond, in the name of the transferee, of any denomination or denomi- nations authorized by this Resolution, and in an aggregate principal amount equal to the principal amount of such bond or principal amount of such bond or bonds so surrendered. In all cases in which bonds shall be exchanged or transferred, the transfer agent and registrar shall authen- ticate at the earliest practical time, bonds in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. All bonds surrendered in such exchange or registration transfer shall forthwith be cancelled. The legislative body may make a charge for every such exchange or registration of trans- fer of bonds sufficient to reimburse it for any tax or other governmen- tal charge required to be paid with •es pect to such exchange or regis- tration of transfer, The transfer agent and registrar shall not be required to make such exchange or registration of transfer of bonds during the fifteen (IS) days immediately preceding any January 2nd or July 2nd. SECTION 16. Mutilated Oestro ed Stolen or Lost Bonds. In case any bond secured hereby sha become muti ated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the legislative body shall cause to be executed and authenticated anew bond of like date and tenor in exchange antl suhstitution for and upon the cancellation of such mutilated bond or in lieu of and in substitution for such bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the owner's paying the r eas ona6le expenses and charges in connection therewith, and, in the case of a bond destroyed, stolen or lost, his filing with the le~isla- tive body of evidence satisfactory to it and to the Treasurer thereof that such bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of hfs ownership thereof, and furnishing the legislative body with indemnity satisfactory to it. SECTION 17. Cancellation of Bonds. All bonds paid or redeemed, either at qr before matur ty, sha be cancelled upon the payment or redemption of such bonds, and shall be delivered to the transfer agent and registrar When such payment or redemption is made. All bonds cancelled under any of the provisions of thfs Resolution shall be destroyed by the transfer agent and registrar, which shall execute a certfffcate in duplica describing the bonds so destroyed, and shall retain said executed ce~ tificate to its permanent files for the issue. • SECTION 16. Reserve Fund. The City hereby establishes and creates a special Reserve un o provide available monies from which the City can advance the amount of any delinquent installment on unpaid assessments levied in these proceedings into the Redemption Fund as a loan. This Reserve Fund shall not be funded in the bond issue, but shall be made available from lawful funds of the City. This Reserve Fund shall be held and main- tained as a separate trust account, distinct from all other funds. The amount se[ aside as available monies shall equal [en percent (10X) of the par amount of bonds issued. For Dart icu la rs as to the disposition and utilization of the special Reserve Fund, reference is made to the Notice of Sale of Improvement Bands previously approved by this City for these proceedings. Upon the discharge of all assessments and bonds, any monies as set aside in the special Reserve Fund shall revert back to the Cfty. SECTION 19. Improvement Fund. The proceeds from the sale of Che bands shall be p aced rn [he and hereby created, pursuant to Sections 10602 and 10424 of the California Streets and Highways Code, as amended, which shall be called the "Improvement Fund", and the monies in said Fund shall be used only for the purposes authorized in said assessment pr oceedings. Any surplus in the Improvement Fund after completion of the improvements shall remain in the Improvement Fund for a period not less than two (2) years from the receipt of Dond proceeds as provided in Section 10427.1 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and thereafter shall be utilized or distributed as determined by the legislat ive body. • SECTION 20. Redemption Fund. Principal of and interest on said bonds shall be Daid out o~the -edemption Fund created pursuant to Section 8671 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Accrued interest paid Dy [he punch aser of the bonds, if any, shall be deposited in the Redemption Fund. In all respects not recited herein, said bonds shall De governed by the provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", Division 10 of the California Streets and Hf ghways Code, as amended. SECTION 21. Covenant to Foreclose. The legislative body hereby covenants that upon e au t o any assessment payment due, it will cause foreclosure proceedings to be brought within one hundred fifty (150) days of such default and thereafter diligently prosecute to completion such proceedings. SECTION 22. Order to Print and Authenticate Bonds. The Treasurer is hereby instruc- ted to cause ands, as set ort ove, to be printed, and to proceed to cause said bonds to be authenticated and delivered to an authorized representative of the purchaser, upon payment of the purchase price as set forth in the accepted proposal for Che sale of bonds. SECTION 23. Arbitrage Certificate. On the basis of the facts, estimates and circum- stances now in existence and in existence on the date of issue of the bonds, as determined by the Treasurer, said Treasurer is he reDy authg- rized to certify that it is not expected that the proceeds of the issue will be used in a manner that would cause such atilt gat ions to be arbi- trage ponds. Such certffication shall be delivered to the purchaser together with the bonds. SECTION 24. Designation of Transfer Agent, Paying Agent and Registr ar. The BANK AMERICA NT & SA is fiereby designated transfer agent, paying agent a~ registrar with respect to these proceedings and the bonds to be issued. SECTION 25. Information for Bidders Document. The Information for Bidders Document, as prepared and submitted, is hereby approved and adopted, and the exe- cution and distribution is hereby authorized. A copy of said Informa- tion for Bidders Document shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings and remain open for public inspection. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1985. C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTEST: Y L K CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA • C~ • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 00 HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council, approved as sn~igned-6y the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the meeting of said City Council held on the day of ~~85, and that the same was passed and adoDte~ tTie following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS EXEC UTEO this day of 1985, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Y L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA [SEAL] • RESOLU': ION N0. ~ - =' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, did publicly open, examine and declare all sealed Draposals or bids for doing the work and improvements described in its Resolution of Intention, which Resolution and a "Report" subsequently approved, are hereby expressly referred to for a description of said work and improvements and for all particulars relative to the proceedings for the works of improvement, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 (ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District") NON, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: • SECTION 1. That the shove recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That this City Council hereby re iects all of said proposals or bids e zcept that herein mentf oned, and does hereby award the construction contract for doing satA work and making improvements in the Assessment District to the lowest responsible bf dde r, to-wit: DONALD C. HUBBS, INC., dha JESSE HUBBS 6 SONS at the prices named in the bid of said bidder on file with the transcript of these proceedings and open far public inspection. SECTION 3. That this award of contract is hereby conditioned upon and made sub,iect to the receipt of monies and proceeds from [he issuance and sale of bonds. The Contractor shall not commence cons tract ion or order equipment until he has received a Notice to proceed. Any progress payment to the - Contractor for work carp le ted may be delayed if monies have not been received from the sale of bonds. SECTION 4. That the works of improvement shall be constructed in the manner and form as set forth in the plans and Specifications for these proceedf nq s, as previously approved as a part of the "Report", as required Dy law and specifically the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 5. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Agr ment for the works of Improvement relating to said Assessment Oistri~ and a copy of said Agreement shall be on file with the transcript of these proceedings. SECTION 5. That all monies to pay for the costs and expenses of the above referenced Assessment District shall be paid from the funds as deposited in the Improvement Fund, including any interest earned thereon. APPROVED and ADOPTED this __ day of 1985. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTE57: Y L K C1iY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA • • • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BEkNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 00 HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council, approved and sign ,y the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the meeting of said City Council held on the day of -x485, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS EIf EC UTEO this _ day of 1985, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Y L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA [SEAL] • ~ RESOLUTION N0. - RESOLUTION DF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND MAKING ANARD FOR SALE OF BONDS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REDEMPTION FUND FOR THE PAYMENT OF SAID BONDS WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has heretofore instituted and conducted proceeds ng5 under the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Df vision 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain public works of improvement, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 (ALTA LOM4 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and, WHEREAS, in the Resolution of Intention it was determined and declared that bonds should issue under the provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California: and, • NHEREAS, there has now been received, in proper form, a proposal for the purchase of said bonds to issue under said proceedings, and said proposal received is cons fdered to be the bid that would best serve the interests of owners of land included within the Assessment District and should be accepted. NON, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the written proposal received from _ _ M. C . Sff.~,.-. ~..~--.C Co ._ ~~. for the purchase of improvement bonds rep resentf ng unpaid assessments in said Assessment District is hereby accepted and approved. SECTION 3. That said sale is subJect to all the terms and conditions as set forth in the Resolution of intention, the accepted proposal, and all other related band authorization document at ton. SECTION 4. That the Treasurer be, and hereby is, directed to have the bonds printed immediately upon the expiration of the cash collection period, and said Treasurer shall then have said bands signed and delivered to said bidder upon receipt of the amount of monies due pursuant to said proposal aM upon the performance of all the conditions as set forth 1n the written proposal. ~~ , SECTION 5. That the interest rate or rates on said bonds be, and the same hereby • fixed at the rate or rates as set forth in said accepted proposal. SECTION 6. That the Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to keep a redemption fund designated by the name of the proceedings, into which he shall place all sums received for the collection of the assessments and the interest thereon, together with all penalties, if applicable, thereon and from which he shall disburse such funds to the registered owner. Under no circumstances shalt the said bonds or interest thereon be paid out of any other fund except as provided by law. Said fund shall be known as the REDEMPTION FUND, aid shall be designated by the name of this Assessment District. SECTION 7. That the Treasurer shall transfer monies as necessary from the SPECIAL RESERVE FUND in the manner and form as authorized 6y law. APPROVED and AOOPTEB this day of 1985. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTEST: • Y L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA l J \J STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Cfty Council, approved and stgne y the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the meeting of said City Council held on the day of -~~BS, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS EXECUTED this _ day of 1985, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Y L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CAL iFORNIA [SEAL] • STAFF REPORT Vry GATE: March 20, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubus, City Engineer S'JBJE CT: Et i•wan da Area Drainage Plan and Polities Gc~aiOy^ <~9 ~~ 1/ } 19]C Council will recall that November 7, 1984, a moratorium was established in the E tiwanda Specific Plan Area to allow the development of a Drainage Master Plan and Development Policies. That moratorium expires at tonight's meeting. The attached resolution adopts the Interim Plan and Policy Statement which was reviewed and recommended for approval 6y the Advisory Committee and the Planning Commission. The report will 6e interim until such time as the City Master Plar~ of Drainage has been revised and a new environmentai document is completed. We will then be recommending a number of modifications to our Drainage Fee Ordinance to update cost and provide a better geographical split of fee funds. CJ SUMMARY OF POLICY ISSUES The drainage report divides the study area into eight subareas with specific ccneitions which must be met for each subarea prier to development. I will not elaborate on the policies which are self-explanatory, There are, however, two policy areas which are highlighted in the adopting resolution. These policies deal with the time of collection of drainage fees and the segregation of drainage fee funds into two unique drainage districts. It is proposed for fee purposes that the Etiwanda area be segregated from the City as a whole and that the area be split at approximately Highland Avenue. This approach is tailored to concentrate funds in the area of development, to accelerate reimbu rsment opportunities and to encourage joint funding or assessment district funding mechanisms. Also to facilitate cost shad ng and to accelerate reimbursments, it is proposed that fees be collected at time of map recordation for Tracts and Parcel Maps rather than at bui iding permit issuance. This element was the most controversial area reviewed by the Committee and may deserve discussion. It is staff's opinion that this apprc ach to fee collection would be the primary impetus to drawing land owners together in an integrated solution. continued....... °~ ~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Etiwanda Area Drainage Plan and Policies March 20, 1985 Page 2 The proposed policies retain fee payments at building permit issuance for development of single family homes on existing lots and development review where ro map would be involved. Single family homes on existing lots are exempt from development policies but will 6e required to pay fees. The proposed plan and policies were reviewed and recnrtenended for approval by Lhe Planning Commission at its March 13, 1985 meeting (see attached resolution and staff report). RECOMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the resolution adopting the interim Etiwanda Area Drainage Plan and Development Policies. Respectfully subm iyted, ~~lf ~ / LB N:N da Attachments • • u ." • ............... ...............un STAFF REPORT DRTE: March 13, 1985 TD: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer ~~t.~•Np ~`/ tr` i ~`/ 9r 19; SUBJECT: INTERIM REPORT ON ETI WAN DA SPECIFIC AREA DRA'NAGr PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES BACKfiRO~JND Recognizing the inadequacy of drainage and flood control facilities to support any development, the City Council on November 7, 1984, imposed a moratorium in the Etiwanda Specific Plan Area for a period of four months to allow preparation of a Master Planned Storm Drain and Development Policies for the area. • With the concerted effort by the City Staff and the Civil Engineering Consultant, Williamson & Schmid of Irvine, an interim report has been prepared to address those issues and to propose policies to implement Lhe Master Plan. A copy of the interim report is attached for your review. ANALYSIS The report proposes two alternate alignments for the Master Planned Storm Drains for your consideration. For the purpose of setting development policies, the area has been delineated into eight (8) subareas based on its unique drainage criteria. Each subarea has separately been addressed in the report. Also included in the report is a recommendation for implementation of those policies. The report was presented to the Etiwanda Drainage Advisory Committee for review and discussion at their meetings on February 28 and March 8, 1985. This interim report specifically dea15 with the storm drain system and associated development poiicies. Presently, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is in the process of preparing a Flood Hazard Map for the area. This map is expected to be published shortly. The FEMA guidelines will impose certain restrictions on development in areas subject Co flooding. It is envisioned that those areas abutting Etiwanda Creek and its spreading ground and the drainage area tributary to the San Sev aine Basin will have major impacts due to flooding. More restrictive development polices may have to be imposed on those aras to conform to FEMA policies. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Interim Report on Etiwanda Specific Area Drainage Plan and Development Policies March 13, 1985 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning apprev ing the Interim Drainage Plan Specific Area and recormnend adoption City of Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully subrt~i tted, / ~ / d/ V l LBH~t' ja / i Attachments Commission adopt the attached resolution and Development Policies for Etiwanda of the same by the City Council of the • L • . ADVISORY COMMITTEE - ETIWANDA DRAINAGE PLAN Chuck Buquet -Rancho Cucamonga City Councilmember Herman Rempel - Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissioner Jim Banks, Rancho Cucamonga Citizens Advisory Commission Wayne Blanton -Newton Realty, Pomona Allan Kielhold, San Bernardino County Transportation and flood Control District Cary Lowe, Lewis Homes, Upland Gerry Bryant, Lewis Homes, Upland Joseph DiIoriu, The Caryn Co., Rancho Cucamonga • '1+~ :/ ~~- ~~~ ,: - J~ ~~ RANC:iO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVIBG THE I'rTERIM DRAINAGE PLAN AND DEVELOPMEN T POLICIES !N ETI FAIT DA SPECIFIC AREA A.'iD RECOMMEND PIG F00?TIOB OF THE SA^1E GY THE ...Tv "O UIIC IL OF THE CITY OF RAYCH7 C„CA!4C'!GF WHER E,;S, on November 7, 1984, the City Council of the City of R;:n cho Cucamonga, passed and zdopted an Ordinance establishing a moratorium on development in the 'e twianda Specific Plan Area to allow far the preparation of Drainage Plan and Development Policies for that Area; and 'L'hEREAS, an interim report on Grainage Plan and Development Pcl icier for the Brea has Seen prepared 6y a Civil Engi r,e Bring Consultant contracted dy the City; and WHEREAS, on .4 arch 13, 1985, the Planning Ccamissicn held a hearing to review and cons der the report. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMON GA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVEC AS FOLLOWS that the interim report on Orainage Plzn and Development Policies for the Etiwan da Specific Plan Area is hereby approved and recommends adoption of _ • the interim ra po rt by the City Coun cii of the City of P,an cho Cucamonga. APPROVED APiD ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF '.ARCH, 1985. uLAIrNING COh1MISS[0^1 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO f.U CHMOiiGA cY: / - ATTEST: rman I, Ric Go ez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho uca~ a, do hereby certify that tha foregoing Resolution was duly and regula ly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City o Rancho C,uc amonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of 7larch, 1985, by the fo'lo~.ri ng vote-to-wit: AYES: ~;0+tvtc,`IONERS: CHIT;EA, iY'lIEL 6A'tKER, RE'4nEL. ST7i' I,UE S: ,:>>I?1i:,a:uliERS: NOt1E AUSENT: COMRISSIONERS: NONE I.,~ • ESOL UTION N0. E93~-28-18R A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IF ORN[A, APPP.OV ING THE INTERIM ET I'dAiJDA AREA DRAINAGE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that the public, health and safety requires that adequate flood control and drainage facilities accompany additional land development; and WHEREAS, to adequately provide guidance to developers and property owners, it is des irah le to est ahlish a Master Plan of Drainage and Development Policies; and WHEREAS, no such plans or policies have been established for the Etiwanda Area; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga upon recommendation of the Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the Interim Etiwanda Area Drainage Plan and Development Policies dated March 20, 1985. BE IT FURTHER RESOL VEO that upon adoption of this Resolution, • drainage fees shall be due and payable prior to recordation of any Parcel Map or Final Map within the Drainage Plan Area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that two drainage fee funds be established for the Etiwanda Drainage Plan Area. Funds generated in Areas 1, 2, 3 and 6 shall be segregated from those collected in Areas 4, 5, 7 and 8. Each fund shall be utilized only for construction of facilities or reimbursements for facilities constructed within the respective areas. PAS SEO, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of t4 arch, 1985. AYES: NOES ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa ,Ion D. Mikels, "layor n rmv nc n n ntr un rr m n nsnw?r n STAFF REPORT ~~~?. z + ~c ' <; ,~: Date: March 15, 19 95 y To: City Council and City Hanager f~~ _.-__~ ____-____ /~ ' IV;; From: Bill Ho11ay, ~ \ DStector, Community 6ervi ces Department Subject: Peq uest by Government Rela tinns Committee of the Chamber of Commerce to amend Ordinance 105-C pertaining to park fee dell ca tion. In briefr this issue is the one that you have reviewed before, as has the Park Development Commission. It centers on [he prowl dons in Section 1(6) which say Sn relation to 'Credit for Private open Space': That the minimum open space for which credit will be considered is three acres... • It Ls that th <ee acre prowl sion which Mr. Gomel objects to. when the Park Development Commission reel eared the matter in some detail last fall the final outcome was that with the pend log flnancl.nq issues facing the City's Pa zk program Proposition 36 and the Park Improvement District, It would be premature to cut any exists nq support systems from 'the public park financi n4 me ch and sms. A1`_h ou qh Proposition 36 has keen defeated the issue of the park Improvement District Ss still unresolved. Therefore to Ef believes that the requested ac tlon Mr. Gomel Ss still premature. C oun cll Opttons• 1. Implement Request 2, Deny Request 3. Refer back to staff to he re-evaluated when the issue of the Park Improvement Issue has been resolved. Staff Recgmme nda ti nn: Optl on 3 If I can answer any questions please let me know. BH/bs rancho ~ucamon~a • CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 7365 CARNELIAN STREET. SUITE 130 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 TELEPHONE: 71419871012 March li, 1985 Mr. Lauren '~Ja sserman, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 "C" Baseline Road P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Dear Mr. k~a sse rma n: • On behalf of the Ra roc ho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, 1 am requesting that I, as chairman of the chamLer's Government Relations Committee, be placed on the agenda for the March 20, 1985, City Council meetino. i will need only a few rnomen is time to ma kz a reque s± that the council reevaluate the minimum acreage requirement for considering credit for private open space, as it is now Stated in Ordinance No. 105-C. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Since reiy, ~ y Lowell GomQs Chairman, llo vernm ent Relations Committee lG:bc rancho ~ucamon~a • CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 7365 CARNELIAN STREET, SUITE 130 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 TELEPHONE: 71419871012 M1ia rch 13, 198; The Honorable Jon D. Mikels 4a yor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 932G "C" 3a se'ine Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91130 near Mayor Mikels: • During Che summer of 1984, Ordinance 106, pertaining to park and recreation land dedication requirements, was revised, leading to the adoption of ;rdina nce 105-C in the early fall. AL this time, the so-called Jarvis IV aro; osi ti on was on the ballot, and Ana ny of us feared that if it passed, we would not be able to look to bond financing for our park development. ?n this ceotext, Ordinance 105 was changed from the previous ordinance in part of uoser,tion E of Section 16.32.030 of the Municipal Lode to read: "(E) That Lhe minimum open space for which credit will be considered is three acres and provides a minimum of four r,f the elements listed below, or a combination of such, anC other recreational improvements that will r.~eet the specific recreation park needs of the future residents of the area;..." 'he intention was to make sure that the general fund obtained as much money as aossible to develop the parks the city had acquired or was purchasing. The unintended result was to make credit for private open space obtainable effectively only for planned communities. The three-acre minimum for up to 60'b Credit meant that a project would have a park and recreation dedication requirement of six (6) acres. This indicates a arojec ted population of 2,000 citizens, which in turn equates to 600 plus dwelling units. That eliminated any smaller project outside the planned communities from being considered for credit. This would be likely to result in those protects designing a lower level of the active recreation elements than if they got partial credit. An example of this is the AM Company. Under the old ordinance, they designed a project with enough active recreation in private open space to merit credit, Under the new rules, their next project, on the same zoning, came in as a "standard" single-family project, with no common open space. -2- The city's General Plan calls for three levels of parks to meet the recreational needs of our citizens. 'We are working hard on the multi-neighbor- hood parks, such a5 Red Hill Basin and Heritage, and the neighborhood parks 5u ch as Bear Gulch. But the third tier of this system, the mini-neighborhood park, has necessarily been bypassed due to funding constraints. It is precisely this sort of recreational need that can be met in part by creative use of private open space. The P,a ncho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Government Relations Committee has held several meetings on this subject. The chamber's concerns were brought before the Park Development Commission members in November. While generally sympathetic to the removal of the minimum acreage requirement, they wanted some direction from the council. On behalf of the Board of Directors and the Govern- ment Relations Committee of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Lomme rce, I request that you consider elimination of the three-acre minimum requirement for private open space credit in Ordinance 105-C. The following is a possible change of Secticn 16.32.030 for your consideration: "(6) That the open space for which credit will be considered shall provide a minimum of four of the elements listed below, or a combination of such, and other recreational improvements that will meet the specific recreation park needs of the future residents of the area:..." Thank you for your consideration of this matter. I shall be present at . the council meeting to answer any questions you or the other council ^~embers may have. Cordially, ~ ~' ~ ~ ~_-~' Lowell Gomes Chairman, Government Relations Committee Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce LG:bc C~ • vu a va' uauvvaav v~i,nuav.vvn (}v-^:np MEMORANDUM ~~'~~~_ ate: Ma rrh, 15, 1985 - '" To: City Covncil and City Manager ~~ "' 1'1" From: Bill Nolley, Community Services Direttor By: Mary Whitney, Community Services Coordinator Subject: Land Donation from the 41111iam Lyon Company for the. Re location of the Chaffey-Garcia House. Per Council action negoti atinns have. been completed within the guidelt nes and parameters es taD llshed through Council direction foc acouisition of property fran the William Lyon Company for the relocation of the Chaffey-Garcia House. The basics of the agreement are as follows: 1. The William Lyon Company will donate to [he CS ty a one acre site for the re loca:Son of ehe Chaffey-Garcia House. 2. As consideration for this donation of property, the City shall grant the W1111 am Lyon Company credit for 1/2 acre towards Priyete Open Space requirements within the Vlc torso Planned Community. Jim Markman, CS ty Attorney, has reviewed this agreement. We met today with Mr. Sim Bailey, Vice President of the wills am Lyon Company, for final acceptance of the attached agreement. At Mr. Bailey's request, a sub-section was added to the aq reemen t, hand written at the bottom of page 2. This sub-section states that in the event reloca tl on of the house does not cake place, ownership of the property will revert back to the William Lyon Company. This section will be incorporated Ln to the final agreement prior to your mee tins of March 20. Staff Recommendation I[ is recommended that hosed on past direction of the CS ty Council that the Mayor be authorized to execute the subject aoreement. Further, that the Community Services Oepar tment he instructed to process and implement such agreemen t. MW:ks 30 ? City of Rancho Cucamonga California • A G R E E !f E N T THIS AGPSEMFNT is entered into Sn the C±tv of Rancho Cucamonga, herei r,at ter called C1"!, and the William Lyon Company, hereinafter called COMPANY. I? IS HEREBY AGRED AS POLL GWG; WHEREAS, the CI PY, wishes to obtain a one acre parcel of land herein descr bed for the purpose of fostering and encouraging a orocram of community suooo rted his aric preserva "•.on, and WR EREAS, the COMPANY, has signified a wll li ngness to donate a one acre parcel of land to the CI :": for said purposes; iT IS NCW THERE SAE AGREED AS FGLLCWS: FIRST: The paztres hereto agree to the following defini trons: A. "PROPERTY" shall mean the one acre parcel of land desc rl bed as 'the east 220 feet of the north 448 feet of Lot 9 block v of Etiwanda Colony Lands subdivision Sn the City of Ran<ho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California as • per map filed Ln map book 2, page 24, records of County Recorder of said County. Except therefrom the north 250 feet.' H. The "COUNCIL" shall mean the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Council is the Governing Body of the City. _. The "DIRECTOR" shall mean the Director of Community Services, or his designee, au tharized by COUNCIL to represent the CITY Ln matters pertai ninq to the PROPERTY. The responsibi li `1 es of the DIRECTOR shall include, but not be limited to the following: 1. Coordinate on behalf of the CITY all necessary documentation re la true to transfer of the PROPERTY. SECOND: The parties hereto agree to the following condl dons: ARTICLE Z - COMPANY A. The COMPANY shall donate to the CZTYr fot the re iota trort of the property known as "The Chaffey-G ar c!a goose", a Clty Hls toric Landmark, the one acre site as described herein. B. Ownership of the PROPERTY, Smprovement made or attached .~ there for shall be vested solely and irrevocably in the name of the CITY. 3~ a gage 2 N11+,: am Lyon Com oa ry Agreement A. As cons :dera tion for the donation of tRe ppOP EFTY, lie CITY shall gran: the COMPANY credit in the amount of 1/2 acre towards any currently unde to nni ned Private Cpen Soace recuir ements for the JSctnria planned Communi tv. ARTIQ.E ZZI - CONDITIONS A. The PROPERTY donated to the CITY by the COMPANY shall 6e used solely for the re iota ion of the 'Chaffey-Garcia House', currently Soca fed at 6295 F.tiwa nda Avenue. The house Will be used EoY non-commercial and noh-Ye9idenL'al activi flea. W1 th the Doss ible exception of a caretaker, no overnight residents shall be a1loWed. 9. WS Ch1n one year after records tron of the Grant Deed a Wooden fence not less than 6 feet in heicRt shall be constructed. • ... Vpon restoration of the hcuse, the exterior shall be maintained in a neat, clean con dl tlon. D. This document may be modified only by further wzi teen agreement between the naztles hereto, and such agreement shall not be effec five until executed by both the COMPANY and the CITY. IN WI141EHE THEAE NRE, The CITY and the COMPANY have caused tbis agreement to be executed cn the day of 1985. For the For the CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMDNGA WILLIAM ,LYON COMPANY By By / ~--~~ ~ / / , ~ /1 ~/ . - , ~ ~ , ,~ ~~ don D. Mike ls, MayoY Name/Tl,t le Beverly Au thelet, Ca Clerk Date ~/ • :,~ ~C ~I+r~ "7 ,~yl. (~p~tg{~ rr-o-.'-~`!~ ~ Q~.P2~~ .,<-i /Xl~f +~ t~b~d Vt yd~ts~~ ~fzuw6i .P~ L~J~...q~rn ~D• - ~.,.. > ~/s/~s~,.u~i Harch 16, 1985 ~ Lauren H. Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga De aY Lauren: I have prepared a financial plan and completion schedule for the restoration of the Chaffey-Garcia house. The information provided is based upon cost estimates that have peen provided by various contractors and building supply companies. The time table is a combination of some contract services, put most of It is volunteer help. I am confident that the house portion of the pro]ect can be completed within the estimated time and cost schedules as outlined. Ha]or expenses such as block wall, asphalt paving, future sewer system, off-site improvements, and proposed future buildings will require additional time due to a lacK of funds. The source of this funding is currently unknown. We have had a lot of interest shown by various conpan ies and individuals In the area to help In the pro]ect. The following materials and/or services have been donated: I. Archlte ctural drawings....H.M.C. • 2. House movlhg ..............Lewls Homes 3. Grading ...................Mathis Constr u.:tlon 4. Foundation Hater lals....,.H tdway Building Supply 5. Foundation labor ..........Cal if. Youth Authority 6. Roof framing ..............Joe DIIor!o 7. Shingle installation......Loca1 roofer 8. Fence Instal3ation......,.Ca1 if. Youth Authority 9. Several hundred dollars In donations The Etiwanda Hlstor lcal Soc le ty has approximately twenty members. Six of the pioneer families are represented by the group. AS a board me miler, I have volunteered to coordinate the work in restoring the house. I have had forty years of experience in the construction field and also have the time re qulred, as I am currently retired. The Society has been established as a tax free museum operation by the I.R.S. and State Franchise Tax Board. Once the house has been moved, we intend to publlc[ze the pro]ect antl seek additional donations of money and materials. We all believe that the Chaffey-Careia house is of ma]or historical value, not only to Rancho Cucamonga, but to the entire West End, If our small group is unable to have the full support of the City and surrounding conmunitles. then our effort to save the house will fall. We cannot accampl ish the lob alone. We appreciate the help that you and your staff have provided vs. Skilcerely, r^,- J~mes W. Clark ~:gC. ESTINATED COMPLETION SCHEDULE FOR HOUSE I. Architectural plans .......................... .....February 1985 Donated by H.M.C. 2. Grade new site ..........................last reek to March 1985 Donated by Mathis Construction 3. Hove house .............................First reek in April 1985 96,800 donated by Lexis Ho ^es 4. Install foundation ........................... ......Hay 31, 1985 Material donated by Nldway Building Supply Labor donated by Calif. Youth Authority 5. Roof fraaing ................................. .....June 30, 1985 Labor provided through Joe DiIorlo 6. Asphalt shingles installed ................... .....July 3l, 1985 Labor donated by local roofer Material purchased by Hlstorlcal Soc lety 7. Reaork building eaterlor ..................... ..October 31, 1985 Labor provided by Hlstorlcal Soc lety Material provided by Historical Society 8. Couple to interior ............................ ....March 31, 1986 Material provided by donations Labor provtded by Hlstorlcal Society ESTINATED MATERIAL COSTS 1. Foundation blocks, steel, ce ^e nt ................. ...... t650 2. Roof Erase and sheet petal ....................... ........850 3. Asphalt shingles ................................ .......1500 4. Miscellaneous porch wa terlals .................... .......2000 5. Miscellaneous outside rework ..................... .......1000 6. Miscellaneous inside rework ...................... .......5000 7. Windows and Erases ................... ........... .......4500 6. Electrical ....................................... ........600 9. Paint and Pa Per .................................. ....... 500 10. Mtscellane our .................................... ........300 House only 16900 11. Chain link fencing ............................... .......4000 12. Asphalt paving ................................... .......4500 13. Sewer ............................................ .......3000 14. Water service .................................... ........800 i5. Landscaping ...................................... ........500 All other 12800 Contingency 5300 Total cost 35000 • • Funds on hand 3500 The cost of the block wall, If required, will be an additional • •18,000 per city quotation. If St is required, we don't see the reason for It to be placed on the north or east alder. The cost would then be reduced Lo (9000. ~.,v ~ rrmv nc n n wrrrrn rr •r n unwtc n • ~,.._ _..v,1,G STAFF REPORT <?~/~~ ~~ ~~, _ ~~ i 14" ~ DATE: March 20, 1985 ///~ T0; Mayor and Members of Ci[y Counci~~/~J~ FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, Ci[y Manage ~~F'^j_,°,•"a,._„_i RUBJECT: AMBULANCE SERVICES IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TAE NEED FOR REGULATION Aa directed 6y Che Ci[y Council, a three-member task force was created [o review and de [ermine the need for regu la[ing ambulance eervicee within the City. After review of all pertinent information and ieeue9 surrounding ambulance eervicee, [be task force has prepared this report which identifies the follwing: * The reaponeibilities of those public agencies directing ambulance eervicee * Those emergency and non-emergency tranef er services provided during the 1984 calendar year * Issues relating to ambulance ae rvice regu la[i on. I[ will be helpful [o note imitially the de si gne[ian of emergency call and transfer call ea recommended by [he teak force: Bmeraencv Call means a request for the dispatch of an ambulance to tr anapor[ or provide other aeei stance £or a person who apparently has a sudden nr unforeseen need of medical attention. Transfer Call means a reque et far the dispatch of an ambulance to tranef er a person, not M1av ing a sudden or unforeseen need for medical atteatioo, Er~m one de etine ci on to another destination for purposes of routine pre-echedu led medical eervicee. These def initi one will play a critical role in [he Council's se [ting policy relating to level of service. The teak force com[ende that ell cal le can be defined ee either of [he above. Ciry Council Agenda March 20, 1985 AMBULANCE SERVICES IN RANCHO COCAHONGA Page 2 r 1 LJ Additionally in coneideziog [he raga lotion of ambulance services, it may be helpful to understand the critera used by the County ¢f Sa¢ Bernardino in determi¢ing "need" for certifying paramedic eervicee. The fol low ing is ext ratted directly from the Inland Count iea Emergency Medical Authority (ICENA): "A¢y organization proposing to prw ids Advanced or Limited Advanced Life Support eery ices moat submit a formal letter of application, accompanied by a proposed ee rvice plan, for review and appr oval by the Health Officer. The applica¢t moat demonstrate the need for each class of service and its economic feasibility, and that the proposed aerv ice will be prw ided competently and efficiently at a level of quality meeting or exceeding current standards. IC ie the ge ue ral in[enti on of the county to ensure the[ 24-hour Advanced Life Support ee rites are available and coat-effective in all densely populated areas of the county, Chet 24-hwr Limited Advanced Life Support eervicee ere developed to serve suburban and semi-rural ereaa where Advanced fife Support eervicee are not juetif ied by service volume and economic feenibili [y, and that 24-hour Basic Life Support eery ices nre available throughout the remainder of fhe county. The Health Officer • shall rev ier and approve or disapprove applica[i one based on this general intent, and when indicated, will recommend madif ica[i on of service plane to conform. The Health Officer may consul[ the Mobile Intene ive Care Adv ivory Committee, the Emergencyda Medical Care Commit see, and other interested community and profeeaional ozgaoizati one in making de term inati one of service clone par suant to [hie plan." Por the Council's reference, a copy of Ordina¢ce No. 230 is attached. The teak force recommends that of ter coneidera[i on of these findings, the city council direct staff to prepare en ambulance ordinance which ref lecte the policies of the council. pRl6HGT d!D TlYBFEI lESFfM186 PlOClDO!!S Eme rRency Reaoonee Procedure Lest year, [he Foothill Pire Dietr i<t responded to approzimete ly 1300 medical emergencies. As policy, the Fire Dietz ict diepatchea at least one fire engine with personnel certified ae Emergency Medical Technician I (EMT) for each emergency call. These pe reonnel usually arrive on [hr, scene prior to the pr ive [e ambulance, since they ee ldom leave Distri^t boundaries and are closer [o the scene than [he private ambulance company. • City Council Agenda Harsh 20, 1985 AMBULANCE SERVICES IN RANCHO CDCAMONGA Page 3 • The large majority of emergency calla are dispatched to the Foo[h ill Pire Dia [r ict via the fire diet rict directly or the Wee[ End Sheriff S[a ti on in Ontario. From [here, Foothill Fire diapa [thee its ow personnel to the scene ae well ae a paramedic unit provided by [he private ambulance company. Upon arrival to a medical emergency, the Emergency Medical Technician I takes appropriate action to the extent his/her training allow. Priva [e ambulance par®edica, upon arrival, will take charge of the medical emergency with the Foothill Fire District pe reonnel aeeie ting where ne ceaeary. When paramed ice arrive on the scene of a medical emergency, a communication link is established be the en a physician in en emergency room a[ a nearby hospital and the paramedic on the scene. As part of the procedure, a description of [he patient's vital signs, the na cure of the injury, the mechanism of injury, and medical hi et ory is conveyed [o the physician, The paramedic, under euperv iei on of a hospital phye ican, es[abl iahes an IV (intravenous) [o ensure a way to quickly adm inieter drugs directly into the circulatory system should it become neceaeery. Adjunctive equipment, henrt monitor iog equipment, end other medical devices may be utilized by [he paramedic ae necessary. It should be noted that if private ambulance pe reonnel were ENT I certified rather than paramedic qualified, [here would be no appreciable increase in patient care ocher Chan the vehicle to physically transport the patient [o [be • appropriate medical facility. In addition, the absence of a paramedic in emergency situa [ions you ld preclude the adminiatrati on of vari oua procedures and equipment as mentioned above. While emergency room ee rv ice is 10-15 minutes from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the benefits of paramedic administered procedures end medi ca ti oa could eignif ican[ ly reduce injury and ultimately save lives. Transfer Call Procedu zee Both the Pao[hill Fire and the independent ambulance compan iee receive reque ate for non-emergeocy transfer eerv ice. In such ca sea, the Fite District does not dispatch their unite, but refers the reque et [o the private company. Summary of Rmerxencv and Transfer Calls AB reported by the Foothill Pire District, [he following is a summary of [hose emergency end non-emergency trenef er eerv ices performed during the calendar year 1984. AB noted, approximate ly 605 of those 1300 calla dispatched were emergencies requiri ag paramedic service, while 205 of those calla did sot require anq tr aneport at all. An additional lOS were attributed [o non-emergency transfer whereby pa ti ante needing no paramedic ae rve were trenef erred from one loco [i on to another (i.e. home, office, hoepi cal). 2t is aignif ican[ [o note the[ [he somber of non-emergeocy transfer calla will increase sign if ican[ly whend [he new 6os pi[al is completed. The following date also indicates a percentage breakdown of those different types of medical prob lame requiring pe remedi< ae rvice. City Council Agenda March 20, 1985 .'KBOLANCE SERVICES IN RANCHO CDCANONGA Page 4 u Summary of Emer gency and Transfer Calls Durine 1984 (Based oa a Partial Survey of 1300 Calls) Percentage of total cells responding vi[h paramedic aerv ice 90S Percentage of total calla defined as emergency 70X Percentage of total calla requiring parmedic aerv ice 60X Percentage of total calls for no transport ("dry rune") 20X Percentage of total calls for non-emergency [tanef er IOX Tvae of Medical Emereenciee Reeoonded to (Based on a Partial Survey of Calla) Trauma 20X Traffic Collisions 18X Mear[ Problems 12X Difficulty Breathing 8X Seizures 6S Over Doee 4X Stroke 1X Other 1X CDltIDIT B1lYVICE P1OPID~S • Pr esen[ly, the City ie aerv iced uy two ambulance compaoiee -- Trans Medical which pr widee both emergency medical and non-emergency transfer ee rv ices and Canyon Medical Service vhich provides only oon-emergency transfer service. Trans-Medical As a County approved paramedic provider agency, Tr an e-Medical, maintains tvo 24-hour paramedic ambulances at tvo be ee locations (Pooch ill et Grove and 8300 Foothill Blvd) vithin [he City, Trans Medical also maintains eight addi [i anal 24-hour paramedic embu lances, end five additional EMT-1 ambulances within the surrounding communities vhich could be available to residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Schedule of rates charged by Trans-Medical are ae follwe according to emergency (paramedic) or non-emergency cranef er (ENT-1) aerv ices: Non-Emergency Emereencv Base Rate S 75.00 S 130.00 Mileage (coat per mile) 5,00 6.00 Night Service (additional) 32.00 32.00 Waiting Time (per l5 min) 22.00 22.00 Oxygen Administered 15.00 15.00 Paramedic Response N/A 6$.00 • Emergegcy Reaponee N/A 50.00 City Council Agenda March 20, 1985 AMBULANCE SERVICES IN RANCHO COCAMONGA Page 5 u Can von Medical Services Canyon Ne di cal maintains three 24-hour EMT-1 ambulances in Opland for use vich in Rancho Cucamonga as non-emergency transfer eerv ice vehicles. Presently, the County of San Bernardino is considering Canyon Medical'a appl nation for paramedic certification. Canyon Medical proposes locating one paramedic ambulance vitb in the City, staffed by one paramedic and one EMf-1 if the cercif ication ie granted by [he County. Schedule of rates charged by Canyon Medical ere ea follwe acco: ding to "proposed" emergency or exie[ing non-emergency transfer services: Transfer Celle Emergency Calls (oronosed) Base Rate S 75.00 $ 100.00 Mileage (coat per mile) S.OC 5.00 Nigbt Service (addi [i onal) 20.C:, xO.OJ Nailing Time (per 15 min) 15.00 15.00 Oxygen Administered 12.00 20.00 Paramedic Response N/A 50.00 Emergency Reeponee N/A N/C • Throughout the 1984 calendar year, Trans Medical responded [0 2,184 emergency cal is and 46 non-emergency calla. Of those emergency calla, 804 (36X) were claseif ied as "dry rune." Cenyoa Hedicel 9erv ices, for a aia month period in 1984 responded to 14 non-emergency talle within the CiCy. Canyon Medical did not begin operating until Suly 1, 1984. POLICT ISBDBB NHICM REQDItR CIYt CWACIL DIYHCI'I011 To determine the appropriate regulation of ambulance services which [he Cicy eh ould implement end to eetablieh gu ids lines for an ambulance eerv ice ordinance, it is recommended [ha[ the Crty Council address the follwing policy ie sues. Level of Service Ybet ~inissom standards shoo ld 6e established for personnel respoedimg to energency and nos-emergency ca1bT Option 1: Adopt universal standards for embu lance personnel and equipment for both emergency and transfer services. Result: Nou ld require paramedics on all ambulance rune (emergency and [raneEer calla). Could prove costly to eerv ice provider and inevitably to patient, since 6eee rate schedule is 25I-5 BX higher Eor paremed is eerv ices rather than tznaef er services (See page 3). City Council Ageada March Z0, 1985 AMHDLANCE SERVICES IN RANCHO COCANONGA Page 6 • Ov[ion 2: Require pnramedica to be available for all emergency Celle while requiring only ENT statue for non-emergency tranaf er services. Re salt: Nould prw ids an acceptable service level necessary for emergency and could prove lees costly to both provider and pe Cient for transfer calls. Transfer calla would eti 11 require paramedic service on all emergency calla, which ae voted accounts fox 90S of all calla. Recommendation: Por the overall benefit of the community, it ie recommended Ghat Option 2 be implemented. Vhat minima. standards shoo ld 6e eaiabliahed for caergeaq vehiele equipment/aappliea and man-sergeme7 transfer cgoipmeut/aopplieat Option 1: Adopt parmedic equipment end vehicle standards for veh is lee responding to emergency cells in order to allow Fvr [he availability of emergency medical equi pmen[ and supplies. Por vehic lee responding onl Co non-emergency ranefer csl le, require the minimum of EMT-1 equipment and vehicle etendarde. Ambulance prw idera may utilize paramedic equipment a¢d vehicles for nos-emergency transfer calla, however. Result: Nhile emergency medical supplies may not be necessary for transfer • eerv ice, main [aiming only emergency paramedic unite would ellom more flexibility in responding to calla duriog a major emergency. Requiring specially marked vehic lee for tranaf er services could reeeric[ service levels since other local juriedicti ono require provider Go maintain only paramedic unite. Requiring a minimum of ENT-1 level equipment and vehicle etendarde you ld still allow ambulance companies to prw ids only non-emergeocy tr anefer eerv ice. Oo[ion 2: De ei gnats varying equipment and vehicle standards for emergeocy and non-emergency [ranefer cal le ac cordiag to emergency euppl ies necessary for the eerv ices. Reaul[: In remote cases, Chia option may not be beneficial [o the public healeh in the event an emergency aitua [i on occurs duriog non-emergency [ranefer service, Such a situeti on is not foreseeable and may be unavoided. Th i• option would require any ezieti¢g company providing a etric Cly nos-emergency [ranefer ee rv ice within the Ci [y to utilize paramedic equipment and vehicles vhea it mnq not be necessary. Recommendation; Option 1 • City Council Agenda March 20, 1985 AMBULANCE SERVICES IM RANCflO COCAMONGA Yage 7 Yhat rsimiamm standard ihwld be eatibliihed ai respwie tine for emergency aediul ier~icet Option 1: Establish arbt Crary "reasonable" reaponee time ae determined by past record of ambulance responses. (Statistical average 8 miautea) Result: Averaging allwe for a wide variance in reaponee times, including the possibility for 20-30 minute responses. Option 2: Es[ab lisp reasonable reaponee time according to the Cal iforaia Eighway Patrol standards (10 minutes). Resu 1[: Utilizing Slate standards ehou ld be reasonable criteria and warrant compliance. City could efficiently monitor su<ce se of standard res pones time and use it in determining the appr opriateneea of renewing prov ider'e permit. Rec ommendaticn: Option 2 Rate S[ru<tu re • Sbwld City regmlate rate structure of imbalance aerwiteat Oot ion 1: Allow ee rv ice prwiders to set rates. Result: May lead [o leas comps ci tive iocreea sag rates since comps tits on among prw iders ie limited by the rotating call structure. Oot ion 2: City escabliehes rase onable race etruccure be aed on provider reque s[s increae ing coe!s. ?seal[: Hay lead to high rate increases if based on inczeasing provider coats, Cou :.d crea ce conf li<t among providers. Option 3: City monitors rates eeC by prwidera based on those rates <barged by providers in other local jar isdictiona, Re salt: ehou ld create a fair and equitable rate structure which can be warracted by rates structures of otber jurisdictions. City Council will not becwe involved in annual discuses on of rate increases, but public rill be aesurred that rates are generally comparable to other communities i^ the Ne et Eod. If we encounter prob lame with this proposed policy, [he Ci[y Couo<il hoe the option of implementing a formal Eee structure at a Inter date. Recommendation: Option 3 City Council Agenda March 20, 1985 AHB0I.ANCE SERpICES IN IUNCflO CIICAYONGA Page 8 ADDI7IO~dL PtOtISIO[8 FO[ AlO1DI.61C6 S~YIC6 RBGDLASI01 From a review of the proposed Ordinance No. 230, the task force recoa®ende <ha[ the follwing prwieione, ae written in Chat ordinance, be included in a new draft ordinance. A <opy of Ordi naoce No. 230 hoe been attached for you reference. Fermi to - Section 4,1.02 [hroug6 Sec[i on 4.1.12. Note: At Council direction, a proviei on requiring she provider to submit the moat recent Ambulance Inspection Report issued by the California Highway Petrol shoo ld be included in renewal of permit. Additi gnally, the reek force recommends the prow iaion of 8 minute response time (95S of ca lle) be altered to reflect a 10 minute response time for all to lle, ae eeta6liehed by the CflP. Invee [iaa[ion 8v City Nanaaer - Section 4.1.05 Emeraencv Service Requirement - Section 4.1.13 Conformance with Permit Ordinance - Section 4,1.14 Standards for Disoatch - Sec[iou 4.1.15 Ambulance Safety and Emer¢encv - Section 4.1.16 Eauiomeni Regu iremente Note: A[ Council direction, this ee coon ehou ld be updated [o include de eigna[ion of emergency response equipment{vehrcle and tranef er response equipment/vehicle as recommended in th ie repot[. Ambulance Pera onnel - Section 4.1.17 Noce: At Council direction, this section should be updated to include de aigna[ion of peremedi< personnel for all emerge..:.y calls and EMT-1 personnel far all traoef er calla ae recommended in this report. Continuation of Call - Section 4,1.18 Eme raencv and Disaster Overa[ione - Section 4,1.19 Veer Como la int Procedures - Section 4.1.20 Enforcement Reeoona ibilitiee - Section 4.1.21 Excused Performance - Sec[i oo 4.1.22 l J • In addition to the above, the task force recommends the follwing be included in prepazeti on of the embu lance ordinance: • City Council Agenda March 20, 1985 ANBDLANCE SERVICES IN RANCHO COCANONGA Page 9 • C ommunica[ione - requiring pr widers [o maintain [he capability of making radio contact be [wean the base eta [i on and each ambulance unit. Automatic Respoaee Prohibited - making i[ unlawful to dispatch an ambulance ae a result of moni toriog or hearing police or fire radio communica[ione. Obedience to Traffic Lave, Ord inenc es and Regu letione Medical Control at Scene of Accident - requirements for coordination of medical service be tveen ambulance personnel and fire personnel. Records and Repor[a - requiring wart oue types of records be available for inapec[i on, including diepa tch loge, inepettion rec orde, maintenance records and financial records. SDMAIT Once the City Council has provided the staff with epecif is di rectioo regarding the major policy is ease, staff will work with the Ci [y Attorney to prepare a comprehene ive ordinance similar to that which vas previously considered several months ago. With the exception of Che policies outlined in Chia report, major • provisions of the previous ordinances were acceptable to a majority of [he Ci [y Council. SE@IS R~.ATIIIG IO AffiDLARCB SERVICE Advance Life Buooort means special eervi cee designed to provide def inieive pr ehaspital emergency medical care including, but not limited to, cardiopulmonary reaueci eati on, cardiac monitoring, cardiac defibrillation, advanced airway management, intrevenoua therapy, adminia tr ati on of epecif ied drugs and other medicinal prepara[i one, and other epecif ied techniques and prose dares edm inistered by authorized personnel under the direct euperviei on of a base eta ti on hospital. Basic Life Suooort means emergency fire[ aid and cardi opu lmonery reeuecita [ion pr ocedurea which, ea a minimum, include recognizing respiratory end cardiac arrest end starting the proper application of cardi opu lmonery reeuaci cation [o maintain life without invasive techniques until the victim may be Cr aneported or until advanced life support ie available. Ambulance means any prive to ly or publicly caned motor vehicle (aircraft, or watercraft) [bat ie epeci al ly deai goad or conetruceed, and equipped, and is intended to be ueed for and ie maintained or operated for the trenaportati on of persona who are sick, injured, wounded, ar otherviee incapacitated or helpless. Ambulance Driver means a person with a valid emergency vehicle open ors cer[it icate and current cer[i£icati on ae em Emergency medical Technician-Ambulance. City Council Agenda March 20, 1985 AMBOLANCE SERVICES Page 10 IN RANCBO COCAMONGA Certificate means a specific document issued to an individual denoting competence in the named area of prehospital service. Emergencv means a condition or situation in which an individual has a need for immediate medical attention, or where the potential for such need ie perceived by emergency medical personnel or a public safety agency. Emer¢encv Call means a request for the diepa [ch of an ambulance to transport or prow ids other assistance for a person who apparently hoe a sudden or unforeseen need of medical attention. Emer¢encv Medical Services means the eervites utilized in responding to a medical emergency. Emer¢encv Medical Technician-I (ENT-1) means an individual trained i^ all facets of basic life supper[ according to standards prescribed by this part and who has a valid cer[if icate issued pur euant to this part, Th ie definition shall include, but no[ be limited to, EMT-1(FS) and EMT-1-A. Eme reencv Medical Technician-II (EMT-ID means an EMT-I rith additional training in limited advanced life eupnort according Co standards prescribed bq this part and who hoe a valid certificate ie sued pur swan[ to th ie per[. Emergeocv Medical Technician-Paramedic CEMT-P oc Paramedic) meene an individual who is a mobile intensive care paramedic whose scope of practice tP provide advanced life support ie according [o standards prescribed by this part and rho has a valid certificate issued pursuant to this pert. Limited Advanced Life Suooort meene special service designed [o provide prehospital emergency medical care limited to techniques and pr ocedurea that exceed basic life support but are lees then advanced life support and ere [hose procedures specified pursuant to Section 1797.171. Local EMS A¢ency means the agency, department, or office having primary responsibility for adminietra[ion of emergency medical eerv ices in a County. Au [horitq ri[hin San Bernardino Comtq ie the Inland Counties Emergency Medical Authority (ICEMA). Provider meene a person or the spouse of a person rho, as an individual or member of a corporation or organization, whether profit making ar nonprofit, on a regular basis gives or offers for sale any supplies, equipment, professional or nonpr o£eseional. Response Time meene the time between [he Po[if ication of a^ ambulan<e eerv ice [ha[ en emergency hoe ac tarred and the arrival of that service et [he scene of [he emergency. • • Trans ter Ambulance means any motor vehicle construct ed, equipped and used for • transferring [he injured or sick under circumstances which do not constitute a^ emergency and rhich Gave not 6e represented ae an emergency. City Council Agenda Narc6 20, 1985 ANBOLANCE SEBYICES IN RANCHO COCAMONGA Page 11 L Traaafer Call means a request for the die pa [c6 of an ambulance to transfer a person, not having a sudden or unforeeeem need for medical attention, from one distinatian [o another destination for purposes of routine pre-scheduled medical services. LNH/kep DRAFT not \eneom® ~OR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY ORDINANCE N0. 230 W OADINANCE 02 TAE CZTS OF PANCHO CUCA.40NGA, C\LIFORNIA, \lffNDING ?NE RANCRO CUCANONOA MUNICIPAL CODE PERT\INING 10 THE flEOVLATION OF At~VLANCFS. She City Council of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca:lfornla, does ordain as follova: SEC?IDN 1: Tne Rancho Cucamonga Munl.1pai Code v hereby amended to read as follova: "Chapter 1. pmtu:mces "Sec. q.1.01. De[Inltlons. Unlev otherwise stated, worm and cacao are def Sned as follova: (a7 AlIDUL1NCE. She term 'ambulmce' meem any vehicle specially constructed, vodlCiea or equlDDed, and mad for the purpose of lraaaDOriing slek. Sn~ured, oonvalescent, Sn[Stm or otherwise SncapecStated persona and vhich is equlppe6 vltb emergency signaang devices (such ea red light and siren} or vhich U sub;act to lieeming ty the Ca:itornla Nighvay Pat: of as m ambulance, (bl AMNVLANGE NEPtlICE OPERAtOR. ;he term 'ambulance service operator' mama any penon Mo owns or operates one or more amhwlmeea. (c) COUNCIL. The term 'COUne11' aeons the City Cauncll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (d) CtASS OF SERVICE. the term 'C:aaa of Service' seam the level or levels of complexity v[ Cield emergency aeaica: services and . will De spec ified as sea SC life auppart provided by Emergency Medical TeCMieim (ENf-tq peraormel conforming to CaL'fornia <alth and Safety Code, Section 17fi0 (Ci, toil advanced :fte support provided by CallTOrnla 1lcemed physician Br by paramedtsa and mob L:e Intensive care nwses certiCled by the ^,ounty 9ealth GttlCer under Ca:ffornla Health and Safety Cotle, Section W01, (e7 CITT. the term 'City' means the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca lifornl a. CIT1 MANAGER. The :arm •CSty Manager' seam CF.e C!ty l of the Qty of flancho Cucamonga, or nis designee. Manager (g} COVNTT. She term 'County' seam the County oC Sm Bernardino, Cal Sfornla. (h) COVNTT NEALTfl OFFICER. The term 'County Ifealeh Officer' means chat person designated as ouch by the County oP San Bernardino. (li EMPCENCT CALL. The term 'Emergency Call' Ss a request for the diapet ch of m ambulmce to transport or prowl de other aafatmce Cor a person who aDParentlY Ma a sudden or unforeseen need of medical attention. U7 EMERGENCY SERVICE. The term 'Eyaergency Service' means the Cunaciom perfatmed in response to m emergency calf. (kl PATIENS. The term 'Patient' means a sick, SnCwed, wounded, Snvalld, eapactant mother, convalescent, or othervise Spcapaeltatad peraen. (1) PERSON. The term 'Person' includes any individual partnmrahlp, firm, corporation, assoclat ton, goverMental agency or other group pr cwOlnstion sating as a unit. OrdSnende No. 23D Page 2 (m) BISIC LIPS SUPPOflT (9L5) AMBULANCE. The term 'gIS • Ambuiance' means an amhulance vhleh has equipment antl supptlea as specified by TSEle 13. California AdmSnlstratlve Code. (nJ ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT. (A15) OR LIMITED ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT (LALSJ AMBULANCE. The Cerm 'ALS or LALS Ambulance' means an ambulance vhlch has additional equipment and suDDlies as spec ifiad by Che County gealth Officer. (c) MOBILE INTENSIVE CAflE (MPC) PANAMBDIC. The Eerm 'MIC Peramedi c' meetu a person aDectally trained in the provision of emergency cardiac end noncardiac core appropriately certlfiee by the Cocnty Health Officer. (p) MOBILE INtENS:YE CARE (MIC) NURSE. The term 'MIC nwse' means a novae vho has been cartsCSed by the County Nealth Officer as qua11f1ed In the provl oleo of emergency cardiac antl no artllac care In the ivuence of emergency Sna lrvctiom to MSC paramedles. (q) PEIIMITTEE. The term 'Perms tree' means any person Mo poaamaea a current CIEy Permit to set as an ambulance aervlce operator. (r) CODE 3. the term 'Code 3' means Che period vhen an ambulance Sa traveling to or from a patient plek-up point using red llghte and/or siren and Ss Crave ling ir. such a mercer as to roach its deaEinatlon Sn the shortest poenible ame. "Sec. V. t.02. Permits: flequlred It shall be umlavful for any person, either as ovnery employee or othervfse, to operate m mbulance, or to engage Sn Ouainem as an • ambulance aervlce operator, upon the streets or any publtc way or place Sn the City except ID confotvvmce vlth a vaL'd CSty permit to operate m ambulance aervlce. (e) EICEPTION9. IDe equipment and perso:mel standards spec ifSed In this chapter apply to all ambulance agent sea; novever, the licensing ens permit requlrementa shell not aDDly to: (U Publicly owed embulenem; a„ (27 Vehicles operated as amDU:antes at the request of local authorities dwtng any btate of var emergency,' duty Droclaived 'state of emergency' or 'local emergenev,' as defined to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 9 of Dtviaion 1 of Title 2 of the Government Cade), as amended. "Sec. q. 1.03• Permit Fees. Permit Cesa shall be those vhlch are, Crom Ciaa to time, set py the Cowoil. All permits shall De issued to expire on June 30 of each year. "Sec. 4.1.OV. Application for a Permit or Peeeral of a permit. (a) PROCEDURE 1ND INFORMITION flEOUIRED. Prerequlaltea to the issuance of a pmrmlt or remevml of a permit for an applicant shell include the f111ng rith the City Manager en application In vrSting on a form to M furnished by the City Manager, rhlch atoll provide the Colloving minimum Snfarmmtlon: (1) Naaa eod daacription of applicant. • Ordinance No. 230 Page 3 • (27 Business addrev and resldenee address of any Sndlv3dwl app: Scant. (3) ?he mme order vhiCh the ambulance service viii do pusinev. (e) If a mrporatlon, a Joint venture, a wrtnerahlp o li¢It ed psrtverohlp, the nmes of all part nen, Or Che names Of corporate oCflcen, their rea!denee addresses acd their peroevt age of part SClpation Sn the Ouaineas. (5) l verifieation that the spy lScant Ss equlppetl to one will provide AIS paramedic service aL ail tlaea So the City. (6) 1 statement Sn reveval applivatSOrs Lhat the applicant ovm or has order his contr03 required equipment to adegwtely covduct m mbulmce service in the CS[y, vD1ch meeb the requlremevta established Dy the Cal3fornla Vehicle Code, and that the applicant nuns or has access to aultaDle and safe facill tto for mints icing his ambulance service iv a clean and sanitary row«[Sov. shoo an Sn1[Ial appllCatlov Sa autallt ed, d statement teat the apDllcaet viii om or viii have wider his rnnt rol required equSpaevt to adegwtely covduct an ambulance service Sn the CSty, vpich meets the roqulremevts eatabl3aDed by the California Vehicle Cotle and that the applicmt viii ovv or viii have access to aultaDle and sate facillt LS tar mintainlo6 pis ambulance aervlm So a clean and aanStary cond3tlon. Both Soltial and ranevsl appllmtioea moat cone sin a statement that the applicsnt viii mintaly («atlon) at least one AIS equipped ambulance vtth:n the geographlcai Dowdvlas of the City. Atltlitiomlly, [M app:SCanE mmt eataDlish to the raaaomDle mtlsfsetlan of the Ctty Manager that the applicnt has edegwte capability Lo 'DSCh up' or augaent such lIS equipped amDulavice Sf it Ss not 1®edlately available to respond to a mil • therefor. (7J A list Cor renewal applicet Iona amended as required d urlog tpe year for any changed, aubatlt uted, loaned or leased vehicles, g3 vlvg a empleta deacript ion of each mbulance vehicle Oparetetl bg tpe appll cant, covering a list Of the ivt erml equlpvaat Carried Dy each ambulance, InC1W SVg the petSent mpavSLy thereof. and a copy of the moat recant Ambu:aece Impaction Report Sasued by the CalSforpla NSghvay Patrol far eecp vehicle. alien an Soltial appllentlon 1a submitted, a lSSt, mended as required awing the year far any changed, avDStit uted, loaned or :eased vehicles, gluing a complete deacM ption of each ubulance vehicie to De operated by the a DPlicent, voverSng a lint of the internal equipment carried by each ambulance, Sncluding the patient ce pab111LY thereof, sod a copy of the moat recent Ambulance Impaction Report Issued Dy Che Calltoro3a HSHhvsy Patrol for each vehicle shoo be provided to the City Memger prior to the alert of mbulance operation. (8) M affltmtion [or roneval appllcatlom that mach Porm3tted ambulance sod Sta appurtenances rnnform to all apDaceDle proviaiom of this Ordimvice, the Callfornla Vehlele Code, Che Calltornla Adminlatretlve Code and any of her State, County ar City applimble dirovtlve. alien an inf alai applf cation is vubmStted, and aftirmatlon that each permitted ambulance and Sta apDUrtemnces covfotn to all applicable provisiom of this chapE ar, the Callfornle Vehicle Coda, the California Administrative Code, and any of per State, Comty or CSty applimble dSrectlve shel: Da provi dad to the City Manager pMOr to the start of mbulsvee operatlom. (9) A at«amant for ravavmi aDDll catiom that the applSemt wploye suffleSavt panomal eaagwbly trained Md aveile Dle to daliwr eNrgwgy AL9 pvuMio ub111Mw sarviem Of good gwllty « all Et WS In CM City. 4Ma M initial application is saDmttbd, a st«~mt coat the apDligmt viii wplmy autticlent pamomsl adgwtely Lralved Md nallebls to daliwr eNrgencq AIS mhulamoe aarricae oC goad gwllty at all elms. Ordinmce Ne. 230 Pads LL (10) A :Sat far renevel applicat iom Bluing a deacrlpClon • of Che level of training tar each wbulmce employee and a copy of each certSflcate or 1lcmvao Sssuetl Dy the State and County estaD11sh1~ qualificat Som of such personnel in wbulmm aperat iom. Yhen m Snitlal aDPllcat lov Ss sub¢Sttetl, a ISat, mevded m required tlwirtg the year for my pareamel chmgea, diving deacriptlov of the level of trnining for ench wbu:mce employee and a coDY of ench cart Sflcate or llcmae Saaued by the State and Lomty eataDllahing quallf SCaL ions oP such peraomel Sn wbulmce operat iom shall De provided to the CStY Memger prier to start of ambulmce opernt SOV. (11) A statement, in m initial appl Scat San, that shams to ~ Che antlstnetion of the City Mamger that the Sasumce of a permit Is Sn the public interest and there Is a need for a permit to be Saaued, iv that there is a requlrwevt for whulmce service which em De legally serviced Dy the apDllean[. (12) A statement sigeed Dy Ehe applicmt that as a condSt loo of the Clty Iaauivg a permit, applicmt agrees to aDpeer and defend nil ectSOro against the City mising ouL of the exeref se of said pervtt, and shell indwvity and save Cha City, Its oPficem mtl wployws and egwts harolesa of and Lrw all claim, tlevantls, actions, or cauma of act Soto of ovary kind and deacrlpt ion resulting tlSrect ly or Sndirec[ly, arlnng aut ot, or in my ny corrected vice the emareSSe of Lola Pormlt. "See. V.1 .O5. Inyeaiigmtlan by CSty Mavag<r. Upon receipt of a coupletetl SnSt1a1 (non-renevel) application, the Cfty Manager shall conduct m Imsetlgntlon to tletevmine If the • applicmt meets all requSrevmts of this Ordinaece, Upon couplet ion of his Investlgatian, the City Mamger shall recommend Co the Comcil test a permit tro grmted or tlenied, 'the detetnainal ion of the Comc11 atoll De made after a public hearing upon the qualiftcet!ans of the ePplSCavt. "Sec. V.LJ6. Insuance or Dw1e1 of Permit. (aJ TTe CSty CouneII may ardor the lsauanee of a nom permit to conduc! m wbulmce service In the CSty upon finding that the applicant vests all requlrwen[a of this Ordlnmca. (D) TTe Comcil wy order the devlal of a permit Sf St finds: (U mat the applicatlan is not :n the corm and does nos contaly the SMOrmtlon required by the provSSiona of this chepterp (2) That the vehicles dwcrihed in tM apD11_et ion ere lmdequate or meafe for the pwposea [or wlch they are to he used) (3) That the color schwa, nme, monogru, or Insignia to De mad upon such vehiclen Ss In coefllet mite or Smitatea my color schwa, nws, mopogrm, or insignia used by my persov so a to ha ulsleading or tend to devalue or dafnud the publSC. (c) Tna Cometl wy order she denial of a pstvit if the applicant or my pertnor, officer or dSrwtar Lharmh (1) Yu provioualr the holder of s City permit, with paralt qa rvabd er auagvdad and the Larva or trovditloda of the auapamiov have not hew fultillmd ar corraabd. (2) Is co~ittimg mr ant, wine, Sr m~lttw hr mr • parvtttw, mould M promda for tea auepanaian or nvonatlm or n panic Saawd pursuant to this Ordlmmca. Ordinance No. 230 Page 5 • (3) Naa mmmlt Vd any act SnvolVing dishonesty, fraud, or Oecalt vh¢reby avather fa ln~a^ed or vhere the appll cent has b¢nefSt ed. (V) Haa act¢d as an ambulance service operator Sn the City vlthout possessing a valid permit therefor. f5) Haa aided or abetted any person to violate any provSSion of thL• chapter or any Drior ambulance ordf nsnce. (6) Makes any [else or misi<ading statement upon any ap olicatien, or dwing the course of any lnveetSgation~ requlre0 or permitted by this chapter. (c) gONOINC OF APPLICANL. gefor¢ any permit fa Lmued wder the proviaiotm of thin Ortllnance, the Council shall require the applicant as a condStioe to the issuance of the permit to post vlth the City Clerk a cash bond Sv the eum of yenty Five ihouaand Daliwa U25~000. 00) or a ewety Cond in the same amount fwnlehed by a corporoElon authorLZed to do business So tF.O State Cf Cal1lornSe, payaCle to the Clty. the bond atoll De condlEfoned upon Che Cuil and faithful performance by the permlttee at hIS oD11galfov under the appl:caDle provfaieeu of [h1a Ordinance and atoll De kept !n Cut: force and effect by the permit Eee throughout the Iife oC the permit and ell ronevala theraoL (d) LIANILITS INSUHANCB, Te peralttee aha 11 obtain and keep in farce during the term Of said permit public 11abi11ty and bodily fnewsnce feaued by a compeoy authorl3ed to dC buaLneaJ So the State of Callforn3a Snswfvg the ovner, and also naming the Cfty ea an addLtlonal inawed of such ambulance against Soea Dy reason oP tngury ar dama8ea that meY reamlt to persona or property trw negligent S operation or defective comtructioo of such ambulance, or from vlolatlon of tnie Ordlnmce or of any ether lav of the Slate of California or of the Onlted States. Said policy ahaa he Sn the sum of not less Chan Fow Million Dollar (gV,DOD,ODD.DO) Ibr p<re mel SnJ wy Eo or death o[ any one person Sn any single acclden E; and the limits of each such vehlcie aha 11 not ba leas tnan Fow Million Ooilars 04,000,000.00) for damages to or destruction of property Ln any one ecoStlent. porkers' Compematton inewance ahe1: M carried covering all employees of the permittee. CoD1¢e of the policies or cart Sfcet ea evidencing such pC11C1es ehaa be CSl.ed vlth the City Clerk. All policies aha 11 camtalp a provision requiring a thirty (30) day notice to De diem to the City Clerk prier to canaellatlon, acdlflcatlan or roduction of limits. "See. V.1.07• Content oC Permit. Tha permit still specify the dates of issuance and of eapiratlon~ the number of amulance units [o be ueed by the permitlee and any special cantlitiona regarding co®unlcatlona, equipment and peraoMel denied appro prleb by the City Cowoil. "Sec. V,1.Og. Amendment o: Permits, Open requsat Oy the pervittee, the City Manager my amend the condltlov epeciflsd in s perm! Sf he floda each requested changes to 4 Sn suhetentfel compllanee vlth the provisions of thin Chapter. 9uoh a•andwvt a1u11 not effect the expiretlan dente of the ealating peralt, nmf ehall St authorise a clangs Ln ovnerehip frov that specified in the original permit. Imo. I1 u Ordlnmce No. 230 Page 6 "Sec. V. 1.09. geneval of Permits. • (a) Fermlta shall be reveved amually by the City Mmager upon eppllca[Son of the Dermlttee, Sf the permit holder proposes no subatmtial change Sn the mntevt Of the permit, and if [he Clty Manager determinee tDat the permit holder has, dwing the Der3od of the expiring perms t, apmeted In aubatmtlei conformity v1Lh Lhe provlalom of this Ordinmce and the rules and regulatSOm o[ the City, and Chat h< Sa capable of cantlnulnq operation 1n conformity with the rules and regulatlov oP the City. (D) Unieaa good cause can be ahoM by Che permittee, it shall be a valid basis tar non-reneMl of a permit if the permlttee has not, dwSng CDe brocading permit perlad, Dad a Code 3 respome time to at lent 951 of its emergency calls of elgnt (g7 minutes a lean. Said respome time Doing mesa wad frN the time the permittee received the request until the permittee~a NDUlmce actually arrived at the locet ion for MSOD LDe aervlCe vas requested. (c) IC thv renewal appllcatlee Drapoaes a aubstentlal chmge In the content of the permit, the appllcetion shall De praeevetl a new appllcetlov pwaumt to sections u.t.05 and Y.1.06 of tnla chapter. "Sec. Y.1.10. Suepenafon and flevocmtlon of Permits. Tee City Nansger shall bs Npoverea to awpend or revoke the permit Sssuad weer the pravlalov of tDls Chapter to operate m ambulmce service, when IC bN Dean found after Snveatl gation Ehat the permlttN or any partner, o[tleer, or dlrectan (a) Yiolates my section of thU chapter or my rules or regulatlona [Dot are promulgated Dy the City which relate to hie • permit actSvStSes. (D) Ie convicted of any offense relating to the use, sale, poawsalon, or trmaportatlov of narcotics or Debit forming drugs. (c7 Camtte any act involving dishonesty, [read, or deceit whereby mother Ss Sn]uretl, or whereby the permit tee has Denef ited, or any set involving wrel twpltuda. (d) gee misreDreaented a material tact Sn obtaining a permit, or Sa no longer adhering Eo the cooditloro specified Ln h1a app:lcatiov. (e) Aida or abate my person who violates the previsions of Chia chapter. (f) Fails to make and keep records shoving hie trmaact LOra ea a peraittN, or Ta11s to Dave aucb records evalleDle for inspection by the City Manager or hla duly authorizea ropreaentat ive for a period of not lean thm three yeah after caapLtton of my trmaactlon La MSeh the records refer, or rofuaea [o comply vtth a vrltt en request of the City Mmtuger or Nke auoh record aveileble for ins pectlon. (gl Accapta m emergency call Men either unable or mvilling to provide the requeatN serviee or fails to infoty the perwn requesting aucb service of any delay and fails to obtalm CDe consent of aucb person Detoro ceualty m smbulmce to reapov0 [ram a :ocetim more dlatmt Clan tM one to which the request na direc Nd. (N R\H1Vae YtNWt aNtWN dYmNLAN{LMt N mmmtimYeYmly ~mmmHe IBC WNtNN wmgemey eNYiee Lem • eN{iwwm MmiN N NN {W ]LL mWme • Ordinance ga. 230 Page 7 • (h) Fa13a to notify the Flre Department of a requaat for emergency asWlmce aeralce. (17 Operetm an emDUlmce demoted as a paramedic volt by vordivg or lettering On Lhe unit rlt hoot qua liCfed gIC peraotmel and equipment iv the vehicle. (J7 During any valldatlon Por1od of not lees than Chlrty (30) days, [all we of permltt ee Co respond to g5f of Code 3 ca lie rit hin eight (B) minutes or ima viii D! au!CicSant g'omda for revocation o[ pervlt. ^$ec. a.t.11. $uepemion, CovdltSOml OperatSOn, and Tmporery Parlance. In the evevt of a change Sn awerahlp of any kind or mtwe, any Snterruptiom of aervlca, eL wmm akaa krpty-Cara Faap Yews dreakiwmr or my aubatantSal change Sn ateffSng or equipment of the ambulance aervSCe, rhich causes the mbulenae aervlca to De carried out different ly then specified Sn the current apentStg permit, [he permlttee shall notify CM LSty tWUger 1®edlately In writing, atatlm the facts of such change. (a) Upov requaat by the petvaittee, the Gity Manager my granE a temporary variance in writing from the condition apecilSed In the wlglnal permit if he flpda LNL ouch cmnge Is Sn aubatant lal complianm with the prmvislom at thin Chapter. if [he Llty Mamger flmda that such change Is not in aubstantSal comDilaeee vSth this Ordinance, he may smpemd, revoke, or amend the permit by written notice. In all caau Mao a chevge of ownership ocewa Sn an ambulance aervlca, m appllcatlov for a new permit shell De filed • with the City Manager wit hin thirty (30) days, in no cane ahsit any temporary rnrSanp be valid for more then sixty (60) days without written approval of the Councfl. "Sec. V,1.12. Appeal Procedwe It the renewal of a permit fa denied by the City ;onager or iC the Clty Mamger aua panda or revokes a permit, the permit ee shall to given rrltten notice specifying not only the action taken, Sut to the event of a auapemlan or revocation, the eCCect:ve date thereat, which aM 11 be no[ leas than flftaen (151 Jaya after the date of said notice. Such not 3t1cetlov shall ba Dy rogiat erect or certified mai:. (e) Yit hin can (10) dqa after the date of such not SCtcet ion. the pmrmit[p may requaat a hearing before the City Manager. Such requaat moat M lm writing to the sty Clerk. Il ouch requaat Ia timely mda, the effsotip data of any denial, atmm~alov or roomtion atoll be ertemdad until fifteen (15) days to 11ow1ng the G ity MNagINa ecEfon upon said requaat. the Clty Mamger may, after auchd heeri~[g, affirm, modify, or set aelde the or Liael deciaten. (D) If, after the hearing provides for above, the City Memgar denim the renwal of or empenda or revokes a pert.it, the petdmittee aha 11 love the right Lo demsn0 a having Dy the Cqunoi 1. l requaat for a hewing dull M mda Sn writing to the CSty Clmrk within f iftem (15) mlendar days fallovivg the denial, ampenai0n, revocation or two-revawl of the penit. Upoe receipt of s mitten requaat, the City Clark shall fat the matt ar for Narivg on a data not corm Sham alrty (60) days follovlty rwmlpt of the written regwat end gip netica Co tb apps ilantr the City Maas{mr, and any other Snbraatad paraom who may preaant evldavea, rminmmt to the deaSaloD cf tbm CSty Memgmr. Yitbin thirty (30) days following the Ordinance No. 230 Page 0 dovclualon of the hearing, the Council aha 11 coke findings and Saaue • Ste order, whether or not the permit should be Issued or the suspension or revocation smtalm. (c) Dwing the time available to request an appeal, and at any time before the anpeal to the Ccuncll shall have become final, the effect of such nov-reveval, auapemion or ravocatSOn shall be stayed. (d) Notvlthat coding any othro prowl slom herela contained to the contrary, the City Manager atoll be empowered to effect an lmmdiate ampemlon of a permit without delayirg the efPectlve data thereof Sf he first finds the cavtanued conduct of such permittee Sa so far remvvetl tram empliance with thin CMpter or the general , welfare vt tsa citizens or the Cltr as to dm t3fY aucn ln•ed:eta action. j (e) Any permittee oho Ns such i®ed late auapemion action taken egalmt It shell have a heer3ttg acnedu3eO Defore the City Manager within seven (7) working Jaya of aucn smpevaioe. "Sec. 4.[.13. Fyargevcy Service flequlremmts. Each penlttee she 11 provide emergency MIC paramedic embulanee service on a coot Snuom twenty-tow (24) hours per day oasis. ^3ec. 4.1.14. CnrJOrmnca vitD Permit Ordinance. No ahulaem operator shall provide ambulance service for mbulance calla orlglmtSng within the City micas ne atoll Hot have a valid City permll. Aqy vloLtlm of this 9evtim anmll M a aa0mmrear. • "Sec. V.1 .15. Standards for DSapstM. Each mbulance service receiving an emergency ambulance request shall dispatch an mnulantt in compliance with the Drocedurea ldentSrled in Title 13, California Adminlatrative Coda. If an ambulance Ia oat available [or Smedlate @aDatch, CM procedures identified Sn ]itle 13, California Administrative Code, stua be compiled v10 h. (a) Tne Fire Department eheli he immediately notified of any emergency ambulance rcqueat. "Sec. V.1 .16. Imtulanee Safety end Emergency Equipment paquirement a. Ambulances shell to maintained et all times iv good mechanical repair and in a clean and smltary condition. (a) MINlM1IM EOVIPtffMT. All mbulences shell be equtpped u3th al: safety atM emrgency equipment required far mbulancm ny the Calltornie tlenlcle Code end the California Advloiatretive Code and edmSnSeMetlve rules of the Cvmty Nealtn Orfider as the emm are nov vrttten, cr nereatter emended. (b) Ala I!®t2ANCE WUIPMENf. In addltton to the regular ambulance equipment and supplies, evy AL4 amnulmce shell ciao be equipped as nqulrad by the valid edminiat ntlve Tulsa of the Comty gealth Oftleer. (c) MIINSENIECE OF F)1EpGENCE EpOLPtffi!S AND SUPPLIES. Drasalvgar bmndmglvgr inatrWnes and athmr medlml eupPllma used for • emrm and treatmmnt or pmtimta viii ne proNebd eq [nay arm atmrile vmm~ ramdy tar uu. '~ Ordinance No. 230 Page 9 • "Sec. tl. 1.17. Mhulance Pereotuiel. Every person who drSVee an ambulance vlthln Che City, vhlle reapondivg to mergeney call>, shall comply vith the requlrmen[a to the California Aded.ni>trat SVe Code for ambulance drivers. The driver oC ao mbulance shall be trained and competent Sn the proper u>e of all mergeney equipmnt required by tC'a Ordlrarme. The driver shall alga hold a certlticate of at least an EM-1A unless the mDUlence aervlce operator has Deen aped Pically a meted From t61s requirement by the Council. (a) At~ULANCE ATTENDAM. M mbulance attendant shall De trained and competent 1n the proPor use of all mergeney equlpmen! required by this Ordinance, and shall hold the required certification of at lees[ an FM-tA. If the vahSnle is belvg used as av A15 mbulmce, at lent one attendant atoll hold a certi[Sdete a> an MiC parmedld Sa>uM by the geelt6 OfCSCer for AIS mbulance. (h7 ATTENDLYf flfGUIflED. EaM abidance befey operated vlthln the City, Sv reapone to an mergevcy call, atoll be staffed by both a driver and NIC pu~adlc. The MIC patsdlc of an mDUlmce responding !o an mergeney cell shell occupy the patient compartmen! rhile trmaporting any perme Sn apperont need at aedieal anent ion. M mbulance drlvar or mbulanoa attendmt rho Ss a G1lfornla lieen>ed DDYaieim or am f4C novae certified by tea county geslth Officer, shall De ezmpt frm the mergeney medical training requlrmmnt of thfa section. This scot ion shall not apply dwing any 'state of mergeney' or 'local emergency' as defined fv the Goverment Coce of the State of • California. "Sec. V. t, ig. font SnntSOn of G11. M mbulance based and properly 1lcemed eubtde the Clty but not llemaad by the City soil n suthorizM to tramport s patient to or tMouen the City, but shall not be authorlied to transport pstimts orlginting Sn the CSty. "Sec. Y.1.19. Emergency and DSSmter Operation. owing any 'state of va mergeney,' 'state of emergency,' o '1ocQ emergency' as defined Sn the California Emergency Servicee Ict (CMpter y of Oiviaion 1 of TStie 2 of the Goverment Code), as mended, each mbulance aervlce operator shall provide equipment, fac Slltim, and psraormel as required by the City Meneger. "Sec. V. 1.20. User Complaint Prooedwea. My user or subscriber to m mbulance service coot ending tMt he has been required Eo pay m exeeaalve charge for aervlce or that he has received unaatlsfectory servlem ny file a wlttm cmplalvt with the City ILnager nett lltg forth such allegatlom. IDe CSty Manger shell notlty the affected paralttee of such coaDlalnt, and shall tnvaatlgete the matter tv det etvlne the validity oP the emplalnt. if the emplalnt la debrmlved to be valid, the CSty Manager atoll take a reuomDla and proper action to aaowe compliance rith the condition of this Ordlnmce. eMord ^Attsvdant" changed to "MIC parawdlc" my 10-11-gV. Ordinance No. 230 Page 10 "Sec. V.1.21. Er.COrcement peapoma1 bi11C1ea. • (a) The CSty Manager shall make all necessary and reasonable rules and regulatlona subdect !o the approval of the Council covering amDUlence service operation, ambulance equipment, ambulance vehicles, ambulance peraomelr and Cor the effective and reasomble edminlrtrac lov of lhla Orditmnce. (b) The Clty Manager shall ins pact the records, facl11t1ea, vehlclmr equipment antl a<thoda oC operation vhenever such im pectfona are deemed neceasary. "Sec. V.1.22. Excused Pertotmnce. No operator atoll be deemed to be Sn violet ion v[ Sta permit SC it ahal; fad to provide. either to vhole or In pert, the services olherviae requ;red Of St Sf such performance la prevented by any of the follow:ng: (a) Acta of God; (b) [a DOr at tikes or dla putea{ (c) Intervention of soy goverment Cady; or (d) My force reaaomDly Deymmd the covtrol of the operator. SECTION 2: IDe City Council hereby dacleres that it would trove adopted Chia Ordinance and each aectlonr suhaectlonr aentenoe, clause, phrase or portion thereat Irrespective of the fact that any one or more sectlom, subaeet lam, aentencea, clauaas, phrases or porriom thereof De declared invalid mr unconatltut uloml. If for aaY rmaona any portion of thl! Ordinance shall be declared invalid or mcOmtltutlunal, Chen all other prowls Iona thereof shall remain Sn full force and effect, • SECTION 3: IDe Mayor atoll s1~ this Ordinance and the City Clark atoll atteak~tEe dams, end the City Clerk shall cause [he Ordinance to be published within fift eee (15) days after its pesaa ge, at least once in the Da11y flepart, a news paper of general circulation, publ Sahed in the City of Ont arto, and circulet eO Sn the City oC BanchO Cucamonga, Callfornla. NOT APPflOgEDr tMa Lne day or Januaryr 1985. AYES: Dahl, Buquet NOES: Nrightr MSkela, King ABSENT: None Jon p..ikela, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Wthelet, ity Clerk • TRl~Ti/'~• MEMORANDUM ~/r~,~' a ~~~ Date: March 13, 1995 ~~ .. _ Z F To: City Council and City Manager =~: __ ~ 19'? From: Hisloric Preservation Commission ey: Mary whitnev, Community Services Coordinator 11 n. Suhjec e: Appointment to Historic Preserva [ion Comml ssion March 20, Agenda Item 7-A. The Historic Preserva tl on Commi salon, at their March 7 mee ring, unanimously selected Mr. Bob Schmidt to be recommended io Council foz appointment to the Canml ss icn. Mr. Schmidt is currently the President of the Casa de Rancho Cucamonga Xis torical Society and has contrnual Ly displayed his Snteres t, knowledge and enthusiasm for historic preservation. If appo in tad, Mr. Schmidt would serve out the tezm vacated by Commissioner Kilmurr ay in January of this year. Nis tr. rm would expl re Julyr 1987. ?M'/ i s Fte~hO~s!~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAR40NGA ADMIN'STRr;T10N • Iris. ~'. 1 7(S191AIll(YlIl1213141$IB CISZ77ffii'S APPLICASIOM IO S6RV6 Od Historic Preservation Commission NAME B. A. Scheidt ADDRESS 6917 Bervl St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 PHONE 987-2972 OCCUPATION Elementary Principal EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) Dfasters Degree CAlifornia State University Los Angeles- 1962 Bachelor's Degree Wash inP.ron University. St Louis - 1950 Are there any Workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please List No • Why are you interested in this position? I am extremely interested in local historv. I have lived, worked and owned property in this area for thirty years and 1 am involved in the com munity anA irs background. Nhat do you consider to be your ma,Jor qualifications? lam active in local historv research as PresiAent of Casa de Rancho Cucamonga Historical Society. I write historical articles for their publication. I have an academic backeround in historv. REFEflENCES: 1. lSaxine Sttane 7103 Archibald Rancho Cucamonga 91730 2. Eueene Billings 6817 Amethyst Rancho Cucamonga 91701 _ _ __ 3, FIOVA Stork 775 N. Ukiah Wav Upland 91786 Please attach a written statement containing any atlditional information you Ceel would be useful to the CLty Council. (AC ?orm E) l ;u~- `9 CITY GF RANCHO CUCAhiGNGA • AD MI N~ST'i: T{ON MAR 141985 AM PY Z ~6~9 )101111121112~3)4~516 CISI26N'S APPLICAIION TO SBEPE ON EIS i o>'~~ ~R-'S ~ 2v aT:c n: 'n wiss~nA: NAME v ._ - n ~ t: r. G '> A' . pDDRE55 ~" ~~ ZIP PHONE "'~~ OCCUPATION EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) pre there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list • t+hy are you interested in this position? ~ ~ r~•. •r: i, ~., f Nhat do you consider to be your ma,Jor qualifications? ~ r' ~/ hr. rr- sl. ~ .~. i. n .T r is 1. i r ~ ~ ~ ~ /~ REFERENCES: 2. ~' Please attach a urltten statement containing any additional information you feel wouJ.d be useful to the City Council. (flC Form E) ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ n < a u: r a C O } • 1 - (p 2 '> l9'l7 • ,: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA er.~lon D. S1lkeb u~.r.r.. Chvku J. &pu<t Ii Iet4q Kin` Riclurd N. DaIJ Pameh J. Wnaht CISIIDI•S aPFLICITIOB 20 S¢R96 09 Park Cevelopment Commission 3~ hlgheat year completed and all degrees) Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If ao, plea u liat~w' Why are you What do you consider to to your ma,jar qualitieationa?. `S~i~C d~.+-e. ,~c.c_ (x ~~~~. Ylnae attach a wrltGn statement contalaiog any addltloaal latormation you feel would W useful to the City Council. (RC Form ¢) ~~f ~ 3~ 7 aao sAaetnve eoAO. turr¢ c .roar omen aoa eo? • aar+ceo cocAeoiroA. cACarotiriA nno • inn eee.ieai 4. ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $ Z l97? CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON: ,F. ~. {'%!.~A_ rI i~~~': rt ~ ~-='~ ~'~' NAME hlc C( •1 {~I ~? ADDRESS !%C;~~ ~iArlr L-.LL/FI CC:!/mil PNONEI / !'r'j- C//,j) OCCUPATION ~Jl St/SC:rYG ~V%C•<L4S (: l~ A/t !~-iNi G~,IL /l i(Ttrr rL' rl~t ~-, .~NY'J EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) /} tl. A/=!-AGE Cs1ArFLI, u/7~ E.`L~% ~ A C'o~C~CL / Are there any wozkday even inga you could not meet? If so, plesae list. h!r'~. Why are you interested in this poai tion7 qui r.r rL{,/ S,t; Ttt E>i C-D rn; • T/LE ~L~C~eLL'V~7~tn. Cl- C•il'. Ccrn Mww, .i a -L-SVF.';/uLu Ji1tK1 /.~ TN6 ~,T..L j qn~ bck .~ r/... c!r~ rti Agar /IOwCi l~i ccY,/7s c.cCC 5 +.. •^. rc 5 /*<'c ti..~~.. ~c~•~~ What do you consider to be your major qualifications?~ N.1!r.' SETL~~ t~- :NC Ne.t,iN[~e ~n~C Tihd /i a( (e/..+•.~ Nd.l L,~fD rA li. C••(N•.~o •-r w 33 <r' /ny iJ yc M. /~L~D ."dCE ICR.r H~..~H [1i Tk6 (i i ~ i_ Nr~ p :C.•,~ cT~ l9 /'C"~rOta; [..-M t c!'/-QI:ti r:., ~~.P [.<!J .~- THG C~iy u„CH N. G+. *E •.. Pi,. Ci /I!:. h.. i /rN.i .Yi REFERENCES :. NC CC n~.P ., ti,fy C-,Cici r9A1J ai.;t~ h, CC T[ Nrt•:= 1Cmr ~a... •.ccn~C•~ .I:' 7no • ,iy CC..i r,..rc> 7c C Fc- 1. /)NCrIc LLr .t'/[•NNeJSC[i c~':[•E !'Pre. r`l pNl. ,=4 v4 Yi u:K -S• /*C. C_ 2. F//jJ/t,P iH% C}~f'L~2= ~ ~~i iCTL~'~ Si /Ai+.< CNTN C~~-K :'Nt•'.t'<N 3.~J }e: JrC (C1C {) ~ CSC AUIf/SS+f .c-lL '~~f/. 5~. "j' l1r." -,G~ Per +IL~CriNC-C- TfIS/C /7rr['.E L(.fv.n•T7cE ~ 11,~/C!lLC•!' Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. r1 L J _.;aR PORT OPPICE 60XSOr • RANCHO CI'CAMONGA.CALIPORNIA P1710 • plgsls.1661 March I5, 1985 Mayor Ton D, ~•tik els Citv Council blr mbrrs City a t P ancho Cucamonga Drar Mayor ~fik els end City Cnuncil Vtrmbers, I am err ally into rrstrd in beine an active member of the city's Park Commission, As a li fr-long rr sid rnt of this arse, I take greet pride in our community and its activitira. Th mu¢hout the years I have been involved in our comm- unity ae a past coach for A°SO (yea ral, I am a past president of the • ~~nmrns socc• r team. T have served a boo year term vith the Student Cite Cnuncil M Floyd Stork School, my last yesr es Chairmen. I ~~ as inat ramrnMl in brining Cable T, V, into my immediate neighborhood, and also inat.amental in brining the Neighborhood Watch Program to my at re et. i am currently a Block Parent. I ~~ea an active member on the Heritage Park Task Force and a member of the Red Hill Basin Task Forte as v~ell. ~fy Huab end es .•ell as myself are both involved in law en[o rcement as fssll time ca rer rs. Last Saturday I volunteered my time (in~+e rp rinting child ran ~~ith the San Derna rdino She ri fPa Dept. and the Chamber of Commerce for our City, i believr in programs that are worthwhile end beneftciel to the residents >f our Community, Being involved pith tte Park Com mie lion vrould be a very ea*.ia tying endeavor for me, Any cons ids ration given me would be greatly appreciated. i _ G-i l., ~`~ ~~GAA,o ~ / ~> CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~, , , . •tii" ~~:iT w.r.. Jon D. Mikelr s r....w.w.. C - 4 ~ Charles J. Eurue( II Jamea G Frnal _ - ~- - Richard M. Dahl Phillip D. 8rhloeeer pr CISIZAN•S nPPLICATION TO SAAl/Lr ON Advisory/Parks • NAD!E Faye E. Chapman ADDRESS 7580 E1 Arco, Cucamonga, CA 91130 Home phone: 985-3214 PEDeE work: 620-7511 X3378 OCCUPATION Small Business Co-ordinaton General Dynamics EDUCATIOtI: (list highest year completed and all degrees) High School diploma +~Ty are you interested in this position? I have always been an involved citizen sensitive to the community needs during rapid transition. I feel I would like to be more directly involved. Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list what do you consider to he your ma,lor nue t o .en. W ... T1~191~ll11~111218NIb~8 RcF r-.R E"ICES: t. Pat Gearna rt 6862 Eci Wanda Avenue, Eti wa nda 2. Betty McNav 7600 Calls Casino, Cucamonga 3. Father Charles Be unison St. Marks Episcopal Church 330 E 16th Street, Upland Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council. RC-(J) 7. 9830 BASELINE NOAD. 9l'ITE (' • R)ST DFFICE EOI 887 EAN('HO CUCAMONGA. CALIFONNIA 91780 17111989.1851 Advisory: 1 have chaired the Civic League Organization in my former town in Virginia. Currently I belong to the Pomona Chamber of Commerce, Pomona Business d Profe55ional Women, as Membership Chairman and am a Booster to the National Management Association at General Dynamics. Parks: I have been very involved in Garden Clubs and Beautificatfon Committees in Virginia. I would like to see all the new developments in our area start their own clubs to beautify our city. This also fills a social need as well as building a sense of pride in our conmunity. u • <'~~ <. , ~yY '7 • 711 ^ A F. ~ ~. C.I > 1971 r1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C ITIZEI:'E APPLICATION TO SEAVE ON: Parka and ReCreati Oa Advisory Cowl ti.p NANE Cary L. Stevem ADDRESS 1)038 Ivy RaaCIlO CICaaOnga P Y.ONE (714) ~9-1028 OCCGPATION Field OpEiatOr E D[IC ATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) High School Diplolo; . Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. No Why are you interested in this po sitlon? T,o proaote latereat In aad iairneeeea to all recreatioml activities in the city. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? Please aee attached atateoeat. AEeeae>lcES: 1,Csry Ciche lla 9800 Clach Ring Leas R,C„(714) 980-5795~Ceztified Public Accountant 2 .Jerry Bredlau 13040 Pinoa R.C..(714) BG9-t ~o7 F'9~w.Ma icnool gaud Prea7dwnt 3 ~(~__BOph._ ?_~wa1 :.lusaan R.C. _(~yy~,.9~1'2389 ~CStTUe Little League pregldent Please attach a wriCten statement containing any additional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City CounciR•E C ~ ~ ~ E ' CITY Of RANCHO COCAMONOA AOMINISTR+,TION * ~r s ~ ~aw~i,>ts,4,ae i PORT OFFICE BOX807 . RA1C11t/COCA>IO\GA, CAWFOR81A 91770 ~ 1710979.1871 v~^ M ay ujer' quallficatlom,I present tM folloxing, 14 years u a Little League aaruger and teach, • 4 years u s girls softball coach. 9 years u Seolor-Sig leagne Adainiatrator for DSetrict 21. 2 years as Area 1 Mnetor for DSatrlct 21(Little league Baseball). Yhile serving u Area 1 Mrector a¢d Senior-Big Ieagu Adalnintrstar,I hnw had the opportunity to eolw local Vague probLeu involving scheduling, rule book deeisions,aad fie ]d ~obleu(i¢cluding helping bui]d a Senior League field for Vineyard Little Ieague),Besides DueL1l,Ihaw supported tha youth soccer leagues Sn the city,I haw supported Alta Lou HSgh School sports taro and plan to support sports and band prograu at the nex Etixa¢da Hlgh School. 2 feel that the city out fSM or bsgl¢ to provide adequte apace for all youth sports prograu sod city sponsored recreational progn; u.This out Be done through bond Ssaues or other aeons for aara city perka,Besidee sports progreu,aore parks are needed for city residents to spend their ]els,ae t1ae,Thadc you for considering RY sppllcatlon. Sincerely, /,f:n,~ 6 ./,~Gi~~ia. Cary L. Stewu • l ~~~V~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ?I-. .eq..Jon D. Mike6 L p '~z f•~r1,- - ti ~ ChWn J. Bvavel tl Jame• C FmA 1911 Rieherd M. Dahl Phillip D. Sehlm•er CISIZEN•S APPLICAtIOR 1'0 SBRY6 OII ;%C:..•~/~ ~ '~_i~o acS nii: ~ +/~ _, ~~.r<.i/-.• ,, ~ NAME ~!d 'Le.! ,~r•'~'~ ~.1 ADDRESS Y.'//n ~i %;~1 ~it.ii~,. .. ,-rte, CT` i -.'.r \.9n i. - ,.'-/ PHONE `.~F'~l-(~ i % OCC1flRCION ~.~ ), •~.'L j Ti ~ ~ 'i96 .z 96 o T EDUCATION: (list hlghgst year completed and all degrees) ~~~-''r~1.~ '-z i./i'°iLc~/, .."tom: ~.i. _.,~ >T ' ;/ ~ ~~^_~7(:.1 Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please 14bt ' • Nhy are you interested in this position?. •_ /<. > ~:.?~ ~~t _ ' REFERENCES: 1. 2. 3. • Please attach s written statement containing any additional information you feel would 6e useful tc the City Council. RC-(I) pif RARRLINR ROAD, 8U1TB C • POeT OFFICB ROX f07 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA f V70 • (71Q fff•If61 Nhat do you consider to be your msJor qualifications2. _ `. ~_r. ! s',u<<~ ~ ; , f' n Y r~~ p Z U 19]] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ONi ~~ UY NAME , '.?-; i-„~ s C~-~ce ~-i?~iY (- ADDRESS Y" ~+l~'t ~'J ., ~G.--, r, G_. J;o„+c 599 rnj •, . ~~ PHONE .r~(J-~ ?j'~ +3 ,>' OCCUPAT ION',Ft.,r,:ac ~'! ~ JG Q:•cr>u'~ a:'xi4 ~r EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? IE so, phase List. ~''~c •-~'d~'c Nhy are you interested in this position7~+t r"~.SC d. ~. ~'a+'+.-.~%~%'nt~i • ~ _ ,. ~ r - -'hr ~,_ ~ c1 .~''G.>'~r?20 YC~C.~vG'l.'~: ), 45 y~f. ~ <~S g..¢b.~J~vC .'PGA.-. y JWhat do you consider to be your major qualifications? 'w ~cl.~C:c~,+-]F. ?7 ;~ : ~'lt.,.c r"~ C:. .:rS CSS'v I4 r~7cK7;~ J7.'Lv]rJ,riG C-I~PZJ ~. c:uJ•~7Cr r G, ;n ,n-7 ,J,~e- rrr .s,~, ": tie REFERENCES: + ~-. Please attach a written statement containing any additional infor- mation yeu Feel would be useful to the City Council. _r ~~~c._,bl tr ~pF.lc~ 'IYJ~ S41-r)~ rr7 E'Y'~~~ FA.r~~ _ 1 ~, ~c»~/t~/J]!_[_1~7C1:J( .w 'i+~/f ~~~UP%O~rrl e'rr~ L•'r • `,'Jai'.KS °i.C7 /J~.yC~~rz,.r~ r;S ~~ L~7<I.: C. r.•. dl, e~ r s~ :' Ji~7a-r~c~ ~~'c~rrC ~P)ar7. POST OPFICE RO%SP7 • RANCHO CCCAlIONCA,CALIFORNIA f17m1 • (7111>eMIS{I -:,~ ~iGa.tfO ~~~, ~ 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • = /~ '~~'-~j~\~^ wa... Jan D. )fikels w _ ~z ..m....~•w.. ~ ('hadn J. Buquet II Jamo C. Frnat -- ~ Richsre N. DeM1I Phillip D. Schlosser IN"~ CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERYE ON ~y.f.K (C::~l//4!///_ !/~S Try': J~rjiv: IlJ f`fl~a ~iaf PNONE f f,~ -h l~' ~ OCCUPATION /-~~ ~ iniF r'.. EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) // ~~// lr~ir~'.-% (~%/C ±'!i% .73 i~~f'iir'i3" .'/i<')`J Afr0.i`l1`f Y'!d.IlAc/T K.'. i Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list Why are you interested in this position? %c' i~.' ~. ~>/s-Tj C~n iJ i t /Jhu.+.cf.- What do you consider to be your major qualifications?/~>/." C~n' /~'~ iN ~~~y„l. -<'ir T/! i:l~ /1 it"~ .~.•/G~ / i~Yc - f•~`.'n/ ii~it .'!~• ' • ~C< !7'/~ ;'f' ti Cllr! i,-h'a'[ /~C .iN C/: ..~'!. C.'.., ...i i- (`. a.: i.,i 7T.. /^ 'EFEflENCES: • Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel could be useful to the City Council. RC-(I) ~~ 9520 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE C PoBT OFFICE BO%907 RAN('NO 1'CCAMONCA. ('ALIFORNIA 917:N1 • 17111989.1851 V aaa yr atAly l.nV VUIiH:Y1V1V ljA G1;CA,'11~ MEMORANDUM ~~~~. f%,~ ~,`. ~~ March 20, 1985 w" "~: City Council and City Manager FAOM: Acbert A. ASzzo Assistant to City Manager SUBJECT: Modification to City Office Space As part of the current fiscal year budget, the City Council authorized the acquisition of additional office space at 9340 Rase Line Unit E (previously occupied by Base Line Mimal Roapitali. It was anticipated with the addition of this space a central counter (one stop servfoe) area could be developed. The plane for this concept were developed and construction bids received, however the cost was verq prahlbitive (Sn the =100,000 range). The present City office facilities are temporary and a capital expenditure of this sort would not 6e prudent, The original notion of a central counter was abandoned and a "bare bones" approach undertaken. This would mean merely providing additional office space to ancomodate the current staffing levels. Four construction bids were received, as follows: Young Contraotora =28,900.00 L. R. Porter S35,T00.00 PNE E38,314.00 Laughlin 347,441.00 The low bid is within the authorized budget amount for these modifications. RECOlMENDATION It is recommended the City Council authorl2e +ho City Manager to accept and sign a contract with Young Contractors to begin construction on the City office modification. RAA:mk ..,.,M U.S•~~qe u.r.wp,,,.,,, '~, :~~'`; Los W Area OmceRau~~an XUrWn 2500 iINNro Boulevard y ~ r° Los Angeles, CelXania 90057 lANif i S rod] ^~'!.. ..^ ~~ Mr. Otto Kroutil ~"~3.,- ~'? City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ ~`~~l,;, '~`~'y P.O. Box 807 "~~i... Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ,'~"jn .. /if ~` 5 Dear Mr. Kroutil: SUBJECT: Comnun ity Development Block Grant Program Request for Determination of Eligibility This is in response to your letter of February 27, 1985 requesting a determination of eligibility for the Lions Comnun ity Center Expansion and the Chaffey-Garcia House. Your letter estimates that approximately twenty-four percent of the residents using the Lions Community Center will be low-and- moderate income. While the City Counci lS part-time use of the center does not violate CDBG reguiations, the activity does not address one of three national objectives of the program, as cited in 24 CFR 570.9D1, and is therefore ineligible. While historic structures such as the Chaffey-Garcia House can be rehabilitated under Section 24 CFR 570.202(d), it is also necessary for the activity to qualify under 24 CFR 570.901. Based on the infor- mation in your letter, this activity does not address one of the national objectives and therefore is considered ineligible for CDBG assistance. Any questions related to the above can be directed to Mr. John Crawford, your Community Planning and Development Representative at (213) 688-5209. S inter ly, ~-~ ~ .Cv/'~~ rbert L R~rts~ Direc tor, Community Planning and Development Division, 9.4C GI:G~tiO1P ' '~ " ~~ ~ ` ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA z u\ s ~~'+,:Yx[y . ~_ .w.«.. inn ^. )likely y ~ r F ~~ ro..n..n,n... __ > Charle.J.ltu I II J¢fhe)' Hine 4~.' 19i% RieharJ )I. Uahl Pnmela,l. R'ri~hl February 25, 1985 Mr. Herb Roberts Community Planning and Development Department of Housing and Urban Development 2500 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 600 Los Angeles, California 90057 SUBJECT: PROJECT ELIGIBILITY Dear Mr. Roberts: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has received proposals for two projects for possible Fy 1985/86 Comnun ity Development Bleck Grant funding. We wish to determine if they are eligible and if so, under what provisions. The projects are described below. The City Council will be considering projects for funding on their March 20, 1985, agenda. We would appreciate having your determination as to the eligibility of these two projects prior to that hearing. 1. lions Community Center Expansion. The Lions Community Center is a multi- purpose recreational factitty located on Base Line Road. The programs it houses draw residents from throughout the City, including low and moderate income residents. 8ecau se the City is growing rapidly, there is a need for mare space for recreation programs. The Community Service Department cannot currently provide the range or number of programs needed and desired due to a lack of space. Since there is room to expand Lions Center and it is centrally located, Community Service- has askeA that CDBG funds be used to fund a portion of the total cost of the expansion equal to the portion of the City residents who are lower income (24X). While the expansion space would be designed and used completely for recreation programs, one of the rooms in the existing center is currently used for City Council, Planning Commission, etc., meetings on a regular basis. This use will continue until a City Hall is built in the next 3-5 years. However, the proposed expansion will not he subject to this usage. Is the proposed expansion eligible under 570.200(b)(1) if it is separated from this general government use? ?. Chaffe Garcia House. The Chaffey-Garcia house is one of the ffrst structures bui t in the region and it is intimately tied to the early history of the comnun ity. It is on the local Register of Landmarks. The land on which it stands has been approved for development and the house has been given to the City and the Etiwanda Historical Society. It will be moved to another site and restored. Because the building will be moved, ft is no longer eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. However, it is still locally significant and will be used as a small museum for the history of City and the area and meeting place. 8720 8ASELIRE ROAD, 9UITEC POST OFFICE. 80X 807 RAXCIIO CCCA710\GA, CALIFOR8Ip 91770 • (71d1989.1851 Mr, Herb Roberts February 25, 1985 Page 2 Can the City utilize COBG funds to assist in this rehabilitation under 5)0.202 (dj (rehabilitation of historic structures) ? If so, should the funding be proportioned to the number of low and moderate income households in the City or can we fund more of the costs? Thank you for your guidance on these two matters. If you have any questions, please feet free to call me. [ON Senior Planner OK:LAW:das DEPARTMENT cc: Bohn Crawford MEMORAN DDM TO: City Council ~O°a ••°'-----~ ~-- -- FROM: City Attorney,~Aewwewfennee3 DATED: MJp'R C L.~J-J. /y Y' 3 RE: Executive Session Notice--Litigation Matters The following statement should be read into the record in accordance with California Government Code Section 54956.9 prior to recessing to an Executive Session: The CouncilfAeleway will recess to Executive Session to consider a litigation matter under the authority of: 'X ~ California Government Code Section 54956.9(a), <~( concerning a matter entitled ~7y AF Qp7,cd/e CUCAAYOU6A VS • ~'• 3•Po. Lf}FGO t C, T7 o F Fb n, + A.~,q Case No. J$~~C L~ ~Y ~~• California Government Code Section 69956.9(a), concerning an adjudicatory proceeding which has been formally initiated. The proceeding will not be identified. To do so would: Jeopardize the City's/Agency's ability to effect service of process. Jeopardize the City's/Agency's ability to conclude existing settlement negotiations to its advantage. n California Government Code Section 54956.9(6)(1)-- I~ conce rninq a matter where there is a significant exposure to litigation. (~ California Government Code Section 54956.9(6)(2)-- concerning whether or not a closed session is authorized under Section 54956.9(6)(1). n California Government Code Section 54956.9(c)-- I~ The Council/Agency has decided, or is deciding, to initiate litigation. ~ NATHAN A 51 N1CN ~~a. ,~ D ONAtO F DAY GARY E EC r_- CHAP.LES A KOEn_cR W IL LIA NI HgAGNEiS C- y-, y.....:, JACn c RA*E__e City of Fontana C A L I F O P V I A March 2G, 19fl5 Lauren Wasserman Ci.Cy of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Lauren: PATRICIA M HURRAY Grr C~ERx JOHN D PIg22q Attached is the official Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release as approved Tuesday, March t9, by Fontana's City Counc ll, and as executed by Fo ntana's Mayor fiat Simon. The Clty of Fontana has executed chis Ag re amen[ in [he belief [ha[ it includes language which is mutually beneficial to both our communities, We have entered this Agreement in the spirit of cooperation. h'e recognize a continuing concern of the Rancho Cucamonga/Etiwa nda com- munity is the total number of units to be developed on the property to question. While we ere advised by our attornfes [hat we cannot legally commit to a density standard until the completion of a Specific Plan; we do he to by acknowledge that [he developer has communicated co us both [hat he will not request a density which exceeds [he gross acreage mul[ipl ied by a factor of four, thus resulting in a total acreage average density not to exceed four units per acre (theoretically a specific acre could exceed [he four units if other acreage was less). As sta Ef we have informed our Council hfembers of this ata tad intent of the develooe r. I[ is our full expec tatlon that the developer shall continue to bind themselves by that intent. Ln the context of the aho ve, we request that your City Council review and approve the attached a[ chis evening's me ing. 5 ncerely, Ja ate lle 1 y Manager JR/NS/pa 3J?1 SIERRA AVENUE iP U aJX 5181 cpNigNA G41F0 RNIA 92J]5 Pnl J50~)600 SISTER CITY - xAML00 P5. B C CA NA Dq SET?LE`IE~T .1C REE11EtiT ADD )!UICAh RELEASE PARTIES the parties to this .\g [cement are the Ci[y of 3a ncho Cucamonea, a municipai corporation, whose address is 9720 Base Line Coad, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (hereinafter "Rancho Cucamonea"), Sames Banks, an individual, whose address is the City of Fontana, a municipal corpo ra [ion (hereinafter "Fontana"), whose address is 8357 Sierra .\venue, Fontana, California 92735, and Che San Bernardino County Local Agency Fo roa Lion Commission (hereinafter the "Com- mission"), whose address is 825 Easc third Screec, Room 201, San 3ernardino, California 92515. RECI?.1LS Rancho Cucamonga and FOnta na are ciC ies adjacent [o each ocher, sharing a common boundary in some areas and separated by unincorpo ra [ed county to rri[o ry in others. The Commission, whose task it is to set and review the boundaries for spheres of influence between cities and to approve annexations, originally established the sphere of influence boundary between the two cities north of Summit Avenue at the northerly extension of San Sevaine Road. In 1984, following an application by the fi Cy of Fontana an^ in spite of apposition by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Commission by Re soiu[i0n Fos. L9S5 and L91i changed this sphere of inf iue nee boundary he bdeen Che two titles by mOVin^, it eastward Co the norther L: extension of fhecrv Avenue north of Summit .\venue and approved l annexation of some of the area 6erween Che northerly excensio ns of San Bevaine Road and Cherry Avenue [o Fontana. This annexation area Ls formally identified by [he Commission as Annexa [ion No. 114, She ultimate location of the portion of Che northern boundary north of Summit Avenue between the two cities involved in Annexation No. 114 has been a matter of dispute between them. Resolutions Nos. 1944 and 1945 were challenged in the action entiCl ed City of Rancho Cucamonga and James Banks, petitioners v. San Bernardino County Local Agency Formation Commission, tes pondent and Cicy of Fontana, real party in interest, and is identified as San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No. OCV 34356 (hereinafter "this action"). All parties to Ch15 action and to [his Agreement now desire [o settle and dispose of, fully and completely, any and all claims, demands and causes of action which are contained in, may arise our of or are Sn any manner connected with this arc ion. In consideration of the mutual releases contained herein, and for good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, [he parties promise, agree and release as follows: 1. Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana each agree to accept and respect [he sphere of influence boundary north of Summit Avenue established by Com- mission Resolution Yo, 1944 as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and 6y reference lncor po rated herein, and [o make no ateempt to have this boundary designated as within the sphere of influence of Che other city. A11 parries recognize that said boundary was established by the Commission after extensive consideration at duly noticed public hearings and consci- totes a Logical and appropriate boundary between the two cities, Rancho Cucamonga and Fnntana fu aher agree co accept and respect each ocher's currently Lncorpo ra red city eerritory and not [o initiate annexa- 2 [ions with each ocher's present city limits, as shown on Exhibit "A". 2. The Commission agrees [o accept and recognize the present Rancho Cucamonga city limits nozth of Interstate IS and to accept and recognize the sphere of influence boundary line established by Commission Re so lotion \o. 1944 as the plan for [he probable ul[[ma to physical boundary and service acea between Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana as the boundary and service area is defined in Government code Section 54774. 3. The Commission shall comp lace Annexation No. 114 [o Fontana upon e xecucion of Chis Ag re amen[ and Rancho Cucamonga and .lames Banks hereby agree thereto. 4. eon Cana shall prepare and complete a specific plan for [he area in Annexa [fan Yo, 114 ([he "anne xa[Son area") and an F.n vironme n[al Impact Report ("EI R") for said specific plan pursuant to the provisions of [he Scace Planning and Zon[ng taw, Government Code Sections 65000 et seq, [he California Environmental Quality Act. Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq, ("CEQ A"), [he State CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Admin. Code Section 15000 et seQ and the Fontana Municipal Code before pe rmlcting any develop- ment to the annexation area. In so doing Fontana shall solicit and seriously consider the concerns of Rancho Cucamonga and shall proceed in accordance with Exhi b[t "B" attached he reCO and incorporated herein by reference. Irt particulaq without 11m1 tang [he foregoing Fontana shall requite [he payment of school impaction fees, or the eq uivalenc, and any ocher fees which may be idencif red as necessary m1[Sga cion in the env ironmen[al raview/specific plan process. 5. Rancho Cucamonga and E'o nca na acknowledge chat the owner of the 570 acres in the annexation area Mas by a separate agreement with Rancho Cucamonga agreed that the annexa cion area shall be developed at a J dens icy of no more than an average of four units per gross acre. Fontana Eu ether acknowledges that this density i5 Consistent with Fo nCana's pre- zoning of the aanexatia;, area. BoCh rile Cities of Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga mu [ua11y agree co permit development at densities no higher than those established by the present West Foothill Community Plan. 6. Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana acknowledge chat the owner of cer- taro unincorporated area west of the sphere of influence boundary esta- blished by Commission Resolution No. 1944 and wese of done xction No. 114 has be a se pa ra [e agreement with Rancho Cucamonga agreed co annex Che area [o Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana agrees not to object to such annexation. 7. The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, [he City Council of Fontana and [he Commission shall each adopt a resolution authorizing [he execution of [his Agreement. Said resolutions are attached hereto as Exhihits C-1, C-2, and C-3. 8. Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana agree [o cooperate in encouraging the establishment of a regional park in [he area of San Se vaine Creek along the sphere of influence houndary established 6y Commission Re so lotion No. 1944. 9. No future change in the land use designations of the County of San 8erna rd ino shall in any way modify this Agreement, 10. Upon [he execution of this agreement, Rancho Cucamonga and James Banks shall file a dismissal with prejudice of this action. Il. Each party hereto shall bear his/her/its own costs and attorneys' Ee es incurred In this action. 12. .his Agreement is made fn compromise of disputed claims be n~een the parties and provisions of this agreement are not co be construed as an admission of liability or re sponsibili[y on the part oC any party. l7. This Agreement constitutes an espltci[ valuer of each and all 4 , provisions of California CLvi1 Code Section 1542, which provides as Ea llous: "A general release does not extend [o claims uh ich the creditor does not know or suspect exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his se [clement with the debtor". 14. There are no agreements or and ers[andings be cween [he parties regarding this matter except Chose expressly set forth herein. I5. This Agreement shall inure to the 6enef is of and shall be binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties and each of chem. 16. the pa rcies hereto hereby declare [ha[ they are executing this Ag reemenC in full settlement and release with full knowledge of S[s provi- sions and after receiving legal advise as [o Gheir rights from their respective attorneys, and declare that each person executing this agreer.,ent in a re presen[aC1 ve capacity or on behalf of a principal or public entity is authorized and empowered to do so an by doing [hereby binds said princi- pal and/or public entity, U. The parties have cooperated in drafting [his Ag rermen[ and neither the Agreement nor any provision thereof shall be construed against any party in any construction or incerpre ta[ion of this dg reeve nt. 18. Except for the agreemen cs sec forth above, the paroles hereto do hereby mutually release and discharge each other, [heir heirs, successors and assigns of and from any and all claims, causes of action or demands of uha[ever nature, anticipnced or unanticipated, known or unknown, incurred on or before the date of execution co [hls dg reeme nt by the parties hereto, including, but not lim iced co, all chins, causes of action qr demand wh LCh are contained Ln, or may arise out of or be in any way connected with this 5 action. 19. Nothing in this ag[eemen[ shall be construed to prevenc any party from bringing an action to enforce [he provisions of [his agreement. In any such action, the prevailing party shall 6e entitled Co recovery of the reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection therewith. 6 The parties hereby agree to execute any ocher documents necessary co effect this Agreement, Dated: , 1981 James E. Banks Da [ed: 1985 CS Cy of Rancho Cucamonga 8y Jon Mike ls, ?layor Dated: , L985 of oncana _~ /j ~ han A. Sim n flavor Dated: 1985 San ernardlno County Local Agency Formation Commission By . Chairman Approved as [o Form and Concen t: R ICLIARDS, WATSOe, DREYFDSS 6 GERSHON A Professional Corporation ALLARD, BHELTON b 0'CO\SOR Wynne Furth Cary C. Wunderlin By Rochelle Browne, dtcorneys for the City of Fon Cana Alan K. Marks, County Counsel Ban Bernardino County 6Y Clark H. Alsop, Deputy County Counsel, Attorneys for [he San Bernardino County Local ,\qe ncy Formation Commission By Attorneys for Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga and James E• Banks E%HIBIT "B" The City of Fontana will solicit and seriously consider [he concerns of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the preparation of a Specific Plan and Environ- mental Impact Report for dnnexacion Area No. 114. Generally, input from [he City of Rancho Cucamonga will be solicited in accordance with [he forma[ found in [he "Scope of Work" which follows. I[ must be noted Chae the Eormat for the "Scope of IJork" included herein will change somewhat as a result of negotiations with [he consultant selected co develop [he Speci- fic Plan and Environmental Impact Repott. Regardless of any changes to the "Scope of Work", the following points of input and/or sharing of products will occur: PHdSE i Iask t: Programming The primary Eocus of [his [ask will be [o deve Lop in is ial development con- cepts and strategies far [he site. The Consultant Team will: meet with Client Team to outline the existing goals and objectives of the City of Fontana and the aDPlicant, which are relevant to the specific planning pro- cess. City of Rancho Cucamonga staff will be invited to participate in this me Being co clarify Rancho Cucamon ga's objectives and concerns. o The summary report shall be made available eo Rancho Cucamonga staff. task 2: Research The purpose of this [ask is [o become familiar with the site to determine environmental, 90C 1a 1, po lltica 1, economic, physical and other EaCtors which may have an impact on deve Lopmen c. Simultaneously, the Co nsu ltanc Team will begin preparing the Environmental Impact Report as outlined in Phase II, Task 4, Environmental Impact Report. Consultant will meet with re pre sen[a[ives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga [o retr Le ve info oration on factors which may impact the development of the Specific Plan. o Copies of rz po its shall be submitted to Rancho Cucamonga scoff. Task 3: Synthesis The purpose of this cask will be [o evaluate and synthesize the inf ormacion Erom prior tasks and to present this information through [he use of composite maps, diagrams, re po res and supplemental visual dls plays to indicate the op porcunl[le s, limf ta[IOns and alternative development st ra teg Ses associazed with the subject site. The consultant will meet with Client Team to identify all pertinent research findings, the interaction of the site characteristics with [he alternative development concepts and expectations for Che site co result in modif ica [ion of the dra Ft (first cuts) alternate land use plans. o A summary Report/Copies [o Rancho Cucamonga Staff. Iask 4: Alternatives The purpose of this task will 6e [o prepare three alternative site u[il iza tion concept plans base on the above preliminary evaluation and analysis and on the initial development concepts. She intent is that these alternatives will qualitatively diffe re n[. Present three (3) alternatives [o [he Rancho Cucamonga Ci [y Council at a workshop session for Che purpose of obtaining formal recommendation. Attend and present three '1) alte rnativec to [he Fontana Planning Commission (aC a workshop), for [he purpose of selecting a preferred alternative, along with Rancho Cucamonga City Council recommendations. Rancho Cucamonga input shall be given serious consideration by the CS[y of Fon Cana, particularly as S[ might [elate co the previously identified environmental issues and their effects on Che City of Rancho Cucamonga. o A copy of the draft product will be made available Co Rancho Cucamonga. PHASE II Task 1: General Plan Amendment Yothing required if consistent with agreement. Task 2: Refinement of Fiscal Re po rc Copy of the draft Fiscal Impact Re po rc will be sent [o the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Task 7: The Specific Plan The purpose of this [ask is [o produce a workable plan document. o Oraft copies [o Rancho Cucamonga Task 4: The Envi ronmencal Impact Re part (EI R) Concurrent with [he pre paracion of the Specific Plan (development plan), and CPA, [he Consultant Team gill prepare an EIR which shall conE orm co [he Cutde lines of [he California Environmental Quality Act (C F.Q,\) and the City's Env ironmencal Guidelines (CF.G), The Consultant will work closely with the Client Team and wi [h Rancho Cucamonga Staff co see that all previously identified issues are satisEactorlly addressed. Fontana Shall seriously consider [hose environmental issues identified 6y the Cf ty of Rancho Cucamonga and the Coun cy's Environmental Review Process during the annexation hearings and subsequent litigation. Foncana will also seriously consider [hose issues affecting Che community of Etiwanda. Each of Chese issues will be addressed by the Environmen cal/Specific Plan Consultant retained by [he City of Foncana. Submit circula to ble draft EIR/PLan/Copies to Rancho Cucamonga. Submic final document/Copies to Rancho Cucamonga. (Rd6CH0) Lw~'~ `e'ra C;//n.. ,; EXFIIBIT •1• CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDN6A DISADVANTABES BUSINESS PR06RAN (DBE) AND 1ANEN-DNNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (HBE) I. POLICY STRTEMENT It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to utilize Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in all aspects of contracting to the maximum extent feasible. This policy is fully described in the City's Disadvantaged Business Program which constitutes City policy and a commitment to substantially increase Disadvantaged Business and Woman-Owned Business Utilization. This policy includes any program or facility funded wholly or in part by any U.S. Department of Transportation modal element, through CalTrans. The City, its contractors and subcontractors, which are the recipients of Federal-aid funds, agree to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts. In this regard, the City and all of its contractors and subcontractors wilt take all reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR 23 to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. N MIKELS, MRYOR -I- II. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) and Women-owned Business Enterprise (WBE) Liaison Officer Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer, is the D/WBE Liaison Officer for the City and shall report to the Director of Community Development. Mr. Hubbs, will 6e assigned such staff as is necessary to fully implement the provision of 49 CFR Part 23 and such other D/WBE programs as may be required. The rep~~~ing structure and duties of support staff are shown on Attachment A. III. Duties of the D/WBE Liaison Officer The D/WBE Liaison Officer shall develop, manage and implement the D/WBE Program on a day-to-day basis. The Liaison Officer shall: * Develop and carry out technical assistance programs for D/WBE's. * Rrrange solicitations, time for the presentation of bids, quantities, specifications, and delivery schedules, so as to facilitate the participation of D/WBE's. Where such changes are found necessary to increase D/WBE utilization, they will be made in consultation and cooperation with the functional unit involved. * Provide guidance to D/WBE's in overcoming barriers, such as inability to obtain bonding or financfng. * Carry out information and communication programs on contracting opportunities in a timely manner. Programs shall be bilingual where appropriate. _2_ * Investigate the services offered by banks owned and controlled by Disadvantaged business and Women Business Enterprises. Ensure that, where feasible, the City utilizes said banks. * Utilize a listing of D/WBE's certified by CalTrans. Said listing to be made available to all bidders on City projects. Such listing will include the follo~ding information: Name, address, telephone number, ethnic and/or sexual ownership, type of work performed by firm. * Approve any removal and/or substitution of a Disadvantaged or Women Business Enterprise during contract performance. Prior to approval of substitution and/or removal of D/WBE, prime contractors will be required to prove performance of good faith efforts to replace the D/WBE with another eligible D/WBE. * Establish overall goals for both disadvantaged and woman-owned business enterprises. Goals shall be evaluated on October 1, of each year and adjusted as necessary. * Establish individual project goals for disadvantaged and woman- owned business enterprises. All projects will 6e evaluated for the appropriateness of goals. * Maintain such documentation as is necessary to verify the City's performance of the above activities. -3- IV. Establishment of Overall D/WBE Goal The City will establish an overall goal for its use of D/WBE's. This goal will be updated annually as of October 1 of each year. The City's overall goal and the methodology used to determine the goal for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1984, is shown on Attachment B. V. Contract Goals All projects receiving U.S. DOT funds will be evaluated far the appropriateness of D/WBE goals. Projects will be evaluated and goals established, utilizing the following criteria: * Size of project. * Opportunities for D/WBE's as subcontractors, vendors, suppliers. * Disadvantaged population of county in which work is to be performed. * Existing/D/WBE goals being utilized in the project area by other State, Federal or local jurisdictions. * Availability of D/WBE's. * Past experience on projects similar to the project being evaluated. * Such other factors as may effect the utilization of D/WBE's. -4- Each project will be evaluated in conformance with the above criteria. Complete documentation will be retained of every project so evaluated. Contracts which do not contain specific goals will contain the following provision. 1. "Pol is It is policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that disadvantaged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under this agreement. Consequently, the D/WRE requirements of 49 CFR Part 23 apply to this agreement." 2. "D/WBE Obligation. (i) The recipient or its contractor agrees to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR ParC 23 have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided under this agreement. In this regard, all recipients or contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. Recipients and theircontractors shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of OOT-assisted contracts." -5- D/WBE use on projects without goals will be reported to the liaison Officer and will be included in the City's reports to Call rans and to the appropriate DOT element. D/WBE use on such projects will be counted toward attainment of the overall goal. VI. Public Notification At the time of submittal of this program to the U.S. Department of Transportation, the City will publish a notice in hoth disadvantaged and majority local media. Said publication shall: * Announce the City's overall goals. * Inform the public that the goals and a description of how they were set, are av ail able for public inspection for a period of 30 days. * Inform the public that both U.S. OOT and the City will accept comments on the goals for 45 days from the date of the notice. * The notice shall advise interested parties that comments are for informational purposes only. In addition to the foregoing, interested disadvantaged and majority contractor orgainizations will receive direct mailings of this complete program with a request that they provide written comments to the City on this program. -6- VII. Contract Procedure This plan shall be implemented through the utilization of a contract special provision which is attached hereto as Attachment "C". These procedures require bidders to submit the names of D/WBE subcontractors and suppliers, a description of the work each is to perform or material to be furnished, and the dollar value of each D/WBE subcontract. VIII. D/WBE Notification Projects will be advertised in local newspapers and minority focus newspapers when possible. These ads will include reference to D/WBE requirements and will indicate DBE and WBE goals set by the City. D/WBE assistance centers will receive notification of projects scheduled to be advertised. Assistance Centers, Minority Business Development Centers and Program Management Centers will receive complimentary plans and specifications for projects within their geographical area of responsibility. IX. Disadvan taaes and Woman Owned Banks The City of Rancho Cucamonga will encourage all contractors to use the services of banks owned and controlled by minorities or women. This encouragement will be disseminated during pre-bid and pre-construction conferences (if scheduled) and the contract specifications. X. selection Criteria for Contracts with D/WBE Goals Every contract containing D/WBE goals shall 6e evaluated by the D/WBE Liaison Officer to his/her designee to ascertain kidding contractor's 7- efforts to attain the D/WBE goals. The award of any project with D/WBE goals must be concurred with Sy the D/WBE Liaison Officer or his/her designee before said contract may be awarded. Should there 6e disagreement between the City's functional units concerning contractor's efforts to attain contract goals for D/WBE participation, the matter shall be referred to the Liaison Officer or his/her designee, for final determination. Competitors that fail to meet the D/WBE goals and fail to demonstrate sufficient reasonable efforts shall not be eligible to be awarded the contract. Any contracts that contain D/WBE goals, pursuant to this policy, will be monitored on an ongoing basis by project personnel during the course of construction. The D/WBE Liaison Officer is to be immediately advised of any circumstances wherein contractor compliance with the D/WBE provision is questionable. The contractor shall submit a final report for each project with D/WBE goals which includes total payments to the prime contractor as well as payments the prime contractor has made to D/WBE subcontractors, vendors and suppliers. If the report indicates the prime contractor has not achieved the project goals, project personnel shall attach an evaluation, in narrative form, of the reasons for failure to attain the goals and any corrective action that was taken. Prime contractors will be required to notify City personnel of any situation in which regularly scheduled progress payments are not made to D/WBE subcontractors, vendors or suppliers. -8- X1. Set-Asides If determined necessary by the D/WBE Liaison Officer, the City, will consider the use of D/WBE set-asides as a tool to achieve the overall City goal. XII. Counting D/WBE Participants The City, its contractors, and subcontractors shall count D/WBE participation in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.47, Title 49, of the Cade of Federal Regulations. XIII. Records and Reports The D/WBE Liaison Officer shall maintain such records, and provide such reports, as are necessary to ensure full compliance with this policy. Such records and reports shall include, as a minimum, the following information: * Awards to D/WBE's. * Awards to majority contractors. * Final project reports concerning D/WBE utilization. * Such other data as is needed to fully evaluate the City's compliance with this program. '9- The D/WBE Liaison Officer shall submit reports to CalTrans and Lo U.S. DOT elements as required. These reports will include: * Number and dollar value of contracts awarded. * Number and dollar value of contracts and subcontracts awarded to D/WBE's. * Description of general categories of contracts awarded to D/WBE's. * The percentage of the dollar value of all contracts awarded during the quarter which were awarded to D/WBE's. * Indication as to the extent of which the percentage met or exceeded the overall Citv goals. * Reports shall be broken dawn separately by ethnic grouping and sex. XIV. D/WBE Listing The City of Rancho Cucamonga will utilize a listing of firms certified by CalTr ans to be Disadvantaged Businesses in accordance with the DOT Order. This listing will be developed and maintained in accordance with Sections 23.51, 23.53, 23.55, and 23.87 of 49 CFR. This listing shall 6e made available to propsective contractors at no charge. -10- Contractors will be permitted to rely upon the authenticity of firms listed in this Directory. %V. Complaints Any comet aints received by the City concerning this program will be investigated 6y the City. The City wilt endeavor to resolve said complaints within 90 days of receipt of the D/WBE Liaison Officer. The appropriate DOT element and CalTr ans will be furnished a copy of the complaint and may be invited to participate in the investigation/resolution. The DOT element and CalTrans will receive a complete investigative report on the complaint and may be requested to concur in the proposed disposition of said complaint. Contractors will 6e directed to notify the City of any complaints they may receive concerning this program. -11- ATTACHMENT "A" Organization Chart CITY MANAGER Mr. Lauren Wasserman COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Mr. Jack Lam LIAISON OFFICER Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs City Engineer Duties Insure that the D/WBE is implemented as adopted by the City Council. Duties per Section IlI of Policy Statement PUBLIC WORKS ENG. SENIOR CIVIL ENG.* TRAFFIC SENIOR CIVIL ENG.* LAND OEVELOPME Ni SENIOR CIVIL ENG* DESIGN t I I ~ Staff Delegation Staff Delegation Staff Delegation Staff Delegation * Duties to assist the Liaison Officer in insuring contractor compliance through receiving reports and taking interviews and making field observations and keeping records of contract acitivities. -12- ATTACHMENT "B" The City of Rancho Cucamonga has set the following annual goals for participation in projects receiving U.S. DOT Funds by DBE and WBE contractors far the period of October 1, 1984 through September 30, 1985. DBE: 10%, WBE: 1%. -13- ATTACHMENT C SPECIAL PROVISIONS 2-1.02 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS. This project is subject to Part 23, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations entitled "Participation By Minority Business Enterprise In Department of Transportation Programs." Portions of the Regulations, including portions of Subpart D which defines Disadvantaged business (DB) and includes other provisions imp1 ementing Section 105(f) of the 1982 Surface Transportation Act, are set forth in Section 6-1.D4, of these special provisions, and the Regulations in their entirety are incorporated herein 6y this reference. Bidders shall be fully informed respecting the requirements of the Regulations and the Department's Disadvantaged Business (DB) and Woman owned Business Enterprise (WBE) progr mns developed pursuant to the Regulations; particular attention is directed to the following matters: (a) A DB or WBE must be a small business concern as defined pursuant to Section 3 of U.S. Small Business Act and relevant regulations promulgated pursuant th¢reto; (6) A DB or WBE may participate as a subcontractor, joint venture partner with a prime or subcontractor, or vendor of material or supplies; (c) A DB or WBE joint venture partner must be responsible for a clearly defined portion of the work to 6e performed in addition to satisfying requirements for ownership and control. The D8 or WBE joint venturer must submit either Schedule B of the Regulations or California Department of Transportation Form CRSA, "Information for Determining Disadvantaged Business and Woman Owned Business Enterprise Joint Venture Eligibility"; (d) A DB or WBE must perform a commercially useful function, i. e., must 6e responsible for the execution of a distinct element of the work and must carry out its responsibility by actually performing, managing and supervising the work; (e) Credit for a DB or WBE vendor of materials or supplies is limited to 20 percent of the amount to be paid to the vendor for the material unless the vendor manufactures or substantially alters the goods; (f) Credit for trucking by OBs and WBES will be the amount to be paid when the DB or WBE trucker will perform the trucking with his/her own trucks, tractors and employees or when a DB or WBE trucking broker has signed agreements with D8 or WBE truckers assuring that the trucking will be performed by DB and WBt truckers, respectively. Credit for trucking by DBs and WBES will be limited to 20 percent of the amount paid in all other cases. (g) A DB or WBE must be a certified DB or WBE on the date bids for the project are opened before credit may 6e allowed toward the DB or WBE goal. The Department's DB and WBE Directory identifies DBs and WBES which have been certified. Others may also qualify for certification but must 6e certified before bid opening. The 06 and WBE directory may be obtained. -14- (h) Noncompliance by the Contractor with the requirements of the regulations constitutes a breach of this contract and may result in termination of the contract or other appropriate remedy for such breach. (i) Bidders are encouraged to utilize services offered by banks owned and controlled by minorities or women. 2-1.03 DB and WBE GOALS FOR THIS PROJECT. The City has established the following goals for disadvantaged businesses (DBj participation and far woman owned business enterprises (WBE) participation for this project: Disadvantaged business (DB) 10 percent Woman owned business enterprises lWBE) 1 percent It is the bidder's responsibility to make a sufficient portion of the work available to subcontractors and suppliers and to select those portions of the work or material needs consistent with the available D6 and WBE subcontractors and suppliers, so as to assure meeting the goals for DB and WBE participation. SECTION 3. SUBMISSION OF DB AND iBE INFORMATION, AWIRO, ANO EXECUTION OF CONTRIICi 3-1.01 GENERAL. The bidder's attention is directed to the provisions in Section 3, "Award and Execution of Contract," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions for the requirements and conditions concerning submittal of DB and WBE information, award, and execution of contract. It is the bidder's responsibility to meet the goals far OD and WBE participation or to provide information to establish that, prior to bidding, the bidder made good faith efforts to do so, as outlined in Appendix A "Guidance Concerning Good Faith Efforts" set forth in Section 6-1.04, "Participation by Minority Business Enterprises in Subcontracting," elsewhere in these special provisions. It is agreed that the bidder's security furnished under the provisions of Section 2-1.07, "Proposal Guaranty," of the Standard Specifications shall also be security for the bidder's compliance with the 08 and WBE information requirements in Section 3-1.OlA, "DB and WBE information," herein. ]t is further agreed that if the bidder fails to submit the required DB and WBE information by the times speciff ed in said Section 3-1.OlA, such failure shall be deemed to 6e a failure to execute the contract and shall be just cuase for the forfeiture of the security of the bidder. 3-1.OlA OB and WBE IMF ORh1ATI ON. The apparent successful bidder (low bidder (low bidder) and the second low bidder shall submit DB and WBE information to the office at which bids were received no later that following bid opening. Other bidders need not submit DB and WBE information unless requested to do so by the Department. When such request is made, the DD and WBE information of such bidder shall be submitted within 5 days, unless a later time is authorized by the Department. The bidders DB and WBE information shall establish that Lhe DB and WBE goals will be met or that a good faith effort to meed the goals has been made. -15- Bidders are cautioned that even though their submittal indicates they wilt meet the stated DB and WBE goals, their submittal should also include their good faith efforts information along with their DB and WBE goal information to protect their eligibility for award of the contract in the event the Department, in its review, finds that the goal has not been met. The information to show that the DB and WBE goals will be met shall include the names of DBs and WBEs to be used with a complete description of work or supplies to be provided by each and the dollar value of each such DB and WBE transaction. (Note: DB and WBE subcontractors for signal and lighting items, if there are such items of work, must have been named in the bid - See section entitled "Subcontracting" of these special provisions). The information necessary to establish the bidder's good faith efforts to meet the DB and WBE goals should inc'.ud e: (1) The names and dates of advertisement of each newspaper, trade paper, and minority-focus paper in which a request for D8 and WBE participation for this project was placed by the bidder; (2) The names and dates of notices of all certified DBs and WBES solicited by direct mail for this project and the dates and methods used for following up initial solicitations to determine with certainty whether the DBS or WBEs were interested. (3) The items of work for which the bidder requested Bubb ids or materiais to be supplied by DBs and WBEs, the information furnished interested DBS and WBEs, the plans, specifications and requirements for the work, and any break down of items of work into economically feasible units to facilitate D8 or WBE participation. Where there are DBs or WBEs available fur doing portions of work normally performed by the bidder with his own forces, the bidder will be expected to make portions of such work available for DBs or WBEs to bid on. (4) The names of DBs and WBEs who submitted bids for any of the work indicated in (3) above which were not accepted, a summary of the bidder's discussions and/or negotiations with them, the name of the subcontractor or supplier that was selected for that portion of work, and the reasons for the bidder's choice. If the reason for rejecting a OB or W8E bid was price, give the price bid by subcontractor or supplier. Since the utilization of available DB's & WBEs is expected, only significant price differences will be considered as cause for rejecting such DB or WBE bids. (6) Assistance that the bidder has extended to DBs and WB ES identified in (4) above to remedy the deficiency in their subbids. (6) Any additional data to support a demonstration of goad faith effort, such as contacts with DB and WBE assistance agencies. 3-1.016 AWARD OF CONTRACT. The award of contract, if it be awarded, will be to the lowest responsible bidder whose proposal complies with all the requirements prescribed and who has met the goals for DB and WBE participation or has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the Department, good faith effort to do so. Meeting the goals for DB and WBE participation or demonstrating, to the satisfaction of the Department, good faith efforts to do so is a condition for being eligible for award of contract. -16- City of Rancho Cucamonga California A G R E E MEN T THZS AGRFF.MENT is entered into in the City of Rancho Cucamonca, herelnaf ter called CITY, and the William Lyon Company, hereinafter Called COMPANY. IT IS HEREBY AGRFFD AS FOLLOWS; WHEREAS, the CITY, wishes to obtain a one acre parcel of land herein described for the purpose of fostering and encouraging a program of community supported historic preservation, and WHEREAS, the COMPANY, has signified a willingness to donate a one acre parcel of land to the CITY for said purposes; IT IS NOW THER£FOAF. AGREED AS FOLLOWS: FIRST: The parties hereto agree to the following defSnl lions: A. "PROPERTY" shall mean the one acre parcel of land described as 'the east 220 feet of the north 448 feet of Lot 9 block J of Etiwanda Colony Lands subdivision in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California as per map filed in map book 2, page 24, records of County Recorder of said County. Except therefrom the north 250 feet.' B. The "COUNCIL" shall mean the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga. The council is the Governing Body of the CS ty. C. The "DIRECTOR" shall mean the Director of community Services, or his designee, au thorl2ed by COUNCIL to repreaen t, the CITY in matters pertaining to the PROPERTY. The responsibi li tree of the DIRECTOR shell Snc lud e, but not be limited to the following: 1. Coordinate on behalf of the C2 TY all necessary documentation rela tl ve to transfer of the PROPERTY. SECOND: The parties hereto agree to the follows nq conditions: ARTICLE I - COMPANY A. The COMPANY shall donate to the CITY, for the relocation of the property known ae "The Chaffey-Garcia Houa a", a City Historic Landmark, the one acre ei to as described herein. B. Ownership of the PROPERTY, Smpiovement mode or attached thereto, shall be vested solely and irrevocably in the name of the CITY. Page 2 William Lyon Company Agreement ARTICLE II - CITY A. As consideration for the donation of the PROPERTY, the CITY shall grant the COMPANY credit Sn the amount of 1/2 acre towards any currently undetermined Private Open Space requirements for the Victoria Planned Community. ARTICLE III - CONDITIONS A. The PROPERTY donated to the CITY by the COMPANY shall be used solely for the relocation of the 'Chaffey-Garcia House', currently located at 6295 £tiwanda Avenue. The house will be used for non-commercial and non-residential actlvl ti es. With the possible exception of a caretaker, no overnight residents shall be allowed. B. Ni thin one year after recordation of the Grant Deed a wooden fence not less than 6 feet in height shall be constructed. C. Upon restoration of the house, the exterior shall be maintained in a neat, clean condition. D. If relocation of the Chaffey-Garcia Houae to this property is not consummated, thia Agreement is null and void and property reverie back to the the Wi lllam Lyon Company. E. This document may be modified only by further written agreement between the partl ea hereto, and each agreement shall not be effective until executed by both the COMPANY and the CITY. IN WITNESS THEREFORE, The CITY and the COMPANY have caused this agreement to be executed on the day of 1485. For the CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MONGA By PoY the WILLIAM LYON COMPANY By Jon D. Mike 18, Mayor Name/Title Beverly Authelet, City Clerk Date City of Rancho Cucamonga California A G R E P. MEN T THIS AGPFEMFNT is entered into Sn the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter called CITY, and the William Lyon Company, hereinafter called COMPANY. IT IG HEAF.HY AGR££D AS FOLLOWS; WHEREAS, the CITY, wishes to obtain a one acre parcel of land herein de scrihed for the purpose of fostering and encouraging a program of community supported historic preservation, and WHEREAS, the COMPANY, has signified a willingness to donate a one acre parcel of land to the CITY for said purposes; IT IS NOW THERFFORE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: FIRST: The parties hereto agree to the following defini lions: A. "PROPERTY" shall mean the one acre parcel of land described as 'the east 220 feet of the north 448 feet of Lot 9 block 7 of F.tiwanda Colony Lands subdivision in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California as per map filed in map book 2, page 24, records of County Recorder of said county. Except therefrom the north 250 feet.' H. The "COUNCIL" shell mean the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Council Sa the Governing Body of the City. C. The "DIRECTOR" shall mean the Director of Community Servl ce s, or his designee, au thorized by CONNCIL to represent the CITY in matters pertaining to the PROPERTY. The responsibilities of the DIRECTOR shall include, but not 6e limited to the following: 1. Coordinate on behalf of the CITY all necessaYy documentation relative to transfer of the PROPERTY. SECOND: The parties hereto agree to the following conditions: ARTICLE I - COMPANY A. The COMPANY shall donate to the CITY, for the selocatron of the property known ae "The Chaffey-Garcia House", a City Historic Landmark, the one acre Bite as described herein. H. Ownership of the PROPERTY, improvement made or attached thereto, shall be vested solely and irrevocably in the name of the CITY. Page 2 tri lli am Lyon Company Agreement ARTICLE II - CZ TY A. As co nside Ya tr on foY the done tlon of the PPOPERTY, the CITY shall grant the COMPANY credit in the amount of 1/2 acre towards any currently undetermined Pzi va to Open Space requirements for the VL ctoria Planned Community. ARTICLE III - CONDITIONS A. The PROPRRTY donated to the CITX by the COMPANY shall 6e used sc le ly for the relocation of the 'Chaffey-Garcia House', currently located at 6295 Etiwa nda Avenue. The house will be used for non-commercial and non-residential activities. with the possible exception of a caretaker, no overnight residents shall be allowed. R. Within one year after recordation of the Grant Deed a wooden fence not less than 6 feet in height shall to constrvcted. C. Upon restoration of the house, the exterior shall be maintained in a neetr clean con ditron. D. If relocation of the Chaffey-Garcia House to this property 15 not consummated, this Agreement is null and void and property reverts back to the the Wi lllam Lyon Company. E. This document may be modified only by further written agreement between the parties hereto, and such agreement shell not be effective until executed by both the COMPANY and the CITY. IN WITNESS THEREFORE, The CITY end the COMPANY have caused this agreement to be executed an the day of 1985. For the CITY OF RANCHO COCA MONGA Ry Eor the WILLIAM LYON COMPANY ey Jon D. Mikels, Mayor Beverly Au thele t, City Clerk Name/Title Date _ '?Y OF RP.tiCHO CUCAMO~JG~ I ~ SETTLE.NENT AGREEMENT ~~~'UUNITv CE!'E'OFidENT CEF'. AND MUTNAL RELEASE MAR 1 ~ 15d5 uA PM ISJ9Jl0illit2!1!2!3!4i516 ~ ,~ ~ I .. ~ ~ ~ . ., v, ~ ~ PARTIES ~ l ~ The parties [o this Agreement are the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal <orporation, whose address is 9320 Ha se Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (hereinafter "Rancho Cucamonga"), James Banks, an individual, whose address is [he City of Fontana, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "FOLCBna"), whose addresa ie 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, California 92335, and [he San Bernardino County Local Agency Formation Commis aion (hereinafter the "Commiseiou'"), whose addresa is 825 Eaet Third Street, Room 201, San Bernardino, California 92415. RECITALS Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana are titian adjacent to each other, sharing a common hounds ry in some areas and separated by unincorporated county territory in others. The Commis lion, whose task it is to net and review the boundaries for apheree of influence between cities and to approve annexations, originally eatabliahed the sphere of influence boundary between the two cities north of Summit Avenue at the northerly extension of San Sevaioe Road, In 1984, fo 11 ovine ao aoolica t'o b Che Ci[v of Fontana and in soi[e_of oooosition by [he Ci tv of R n h Cucamonga, the Commission by Resolution Nos, 1944 and 1945 changed Ch ie sphere of influence boundary between the two cities by moving i[ eas [ward to [he northerly extension of Cherry Avenue north of Summit Avenue and approved 1 annexation of some of [he area between the northerly extensions of San Seva ins Road and Cherry Avenue to Foncana. This annexation area is formally identified by [he Commission as Annexation No. 114. The ultima [e location of the portion of the rsorthein boundary north of Summit Avenue between [he two cities involved in Annexation No. 114 has been a matter of dispute between [hem. Resolutions Nos. 1944 and 1945 were challenged in the action entitled City of Rancho Cucamonga and James Banks, petitioners v. San Bernardino County Local Agency Formation Commission, responders[ and City of Foncana, real party in interest, and is identified as San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No. OCV 34356 (hereinafter "this action'). All parties to Ch is action and [o this Agreement now desire [o settle and diepase of, fully and completely, any and all claims, demarsda and causes of action which are contained in, may arise out of or are in a¢y manner comec[ed with [his actio¢, erevided-fiewever-ther-she-6ity-ef-Reeehe 6neemenre--deea--nee-meke-ant--<emmitment-te-refrnin-from--bzinr$nr.--felarn }aweaiie-shoe}d-the-brio-ef-£eneene-Dressed-le-sie}ate-this-arreemenz:-!he 6e}}fernie--£nv}re+meele}--fine}}h-Ael-or-nm-alher-}erin-co_nneetien--rith the-ereceseimr-ef-the-deve}eomentr ' I¢ consideration of [he mutual releases contained herein, and for good a¢d valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby ecknow ledged, the parties pr omia e, agree and release as follows: 1. Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana each agree to accept and respece [he sphere of influence boundary north of Summit Avenue established by Comsission Resolution No. 1944 as shown on Fxhibi[ "A" attached hereto arsd by re Eerencr incornoratrd herein, and [o make no attempt to have th ie boundary des igneted as within [he sphere of inE luence of the other city. All parties recognize [hat said boundary was established by Che Comm is aion 2 after extens iye consideration at duly not it ed public hearings and constitutes a logical and appropriate boundary between the two cities. Rancho Cucamonea and Fontana fu [h c e to cc o[ d res e t h other's eurr entl incornora ced c'tv t ito d not t i 't'at annexations with each other's resent cit limits as shown on Exhibit "A", 2, The Commission agrees [o accept and recognize the nreaent Ran h Cucamonea city 1'mits th f In[ rsta[e 15 and to secs t nd oxni e the sphere of influence boundary line established by Commission P.eaolution as the plan for the probable ultimate physical boundary and service area be tveen Rancho Cucamonga and Ponlana ae [hat boundary and service area ie defined in Government code Section 54774. No. 1944 / ea the n}!}male phyeiee} benndery beeveee Renehe Bneemenge eed Pontaner A}}-nerliee-ezree-!h !-nnr-fnlnze-ennexelien-eereae-this-bennderr een}d-heve-aitnifieent-evrire a }-}m e!a d she £ere-nn-Earire~enla} impeni--Revere--eh }}-be~reaered-befe -th -6emmi»ien- oor • a • eh ennexelien- 3. The Commission shall complete Annexation No. 114 to Fontana upon eaecut ion of this Agreement and Rancho Cucamonga and lames Sanke hereby agree [hereto. ' 4. Fontana shall pr epe re and complete a specific plan For [he area in Annexation No. 114 (the "annexation area") and an Env ironmentel Impact Report ("EIR") for said apecit is plan pursuant to [he prov iaione of Che State Planning and Zoning Law, Covernment Code :ectione 65000 et sea, the California Environmental Quality Act. Public Resources Cade Section 21000 et seg, ("CEQA"), the Scats CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Admin. Code Section 15000 P.t seg and the Fontana Municipal Code before permitting any deve lopmenG in the annexation area. In so doing Fontana shall solicit and seriously consider [he concerns of Rancho Cucamonga and shall proceed in 3 accordance with Exhib i[ "S" attached hereto and incorporated herein 6y reference. In oar titular with u[ 1' icing the force 'ne Font hall require [h a ant of school i a ti f o the 'v lent d v other fees which ma be iden[if ied as necessar~ miti anon in the environmental re w/ v if is nl n r ass. 5. Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana acknowledge that [he owner of [he 570 acres in the annexation area hea by a separate agreement with Rancho anneaa tion area Cucamonga agreed ( ] that the_[ }cad shall b d elo d at a density of no more than an average of four units per gross acre. Fontana further acknowledges that [hie density ie conais tent with Fontana'e prezoning of Both the Cities of Pon[ana and Rancho Cucamonga mutually agree the annexation area.Jend-arreee--see to rmit d vc low~ent at hi•h no hi her densit iea / than th tab l' had b the [ west P [hrll Cov®u cv Plan. 6. Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana acknowledge that [he owner of certain unincorporated area wea[ of the sphere of influence boundary established by Commission Resolution Nn, 1944 and west of Annexation No. 114 has be a separate agreement with Rancho Cucamonga agreed to annex the area Co Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana agrees no[ Co object to ouch annexation. 7. The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, the City Council of Fontana and the Commission shall each adopt a resolution authorizing the execution of this Agreement. Said resolu[ione~re attached hereto Exhibits C 1 C-2. and C-3. 8. Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana agree [o cooperate in encouraging the es to bl ishment n; a regional park in [he area of San Seva ins Creek along [lie sphere of inf lue¢ce boundary established by Commission Reso lotion No. 1944, 9. No future change in the land use des ignatio¢s of [he County of 4 San Bernardino shall in any way modify this Agreement. 10. Upon the execution of [his agreement, Ra¢cho Cucamonga and James Banks shall File a dismissal with prejudice of this ac tio¢. I1. Each party hereto shall bear his/her/its own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in this action. 12. This Agreement is made in compromise of disputed claims be [wean the parties and provisions of this agreement are not [o be construed as en admission of liability or responsibility on the part of any party. }fv13. This Agreement constitutes an explicit waiver of each and all provisions of California Civil Code Set [ion 1542, which provides ae follows: "A general release does not extend [o claims which Che creditor does no[ know or suspect exist in his favor at the time of executing Che release. which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor^. Prerided:-heweoer:-ghee-Panefio-6 oa --reaeraen--iea-rich[-to--eh }}acre enr-fnlnre-i}}see}}er-in-the-der } aclnl-ef-th - xed }nnd f '} _ bS aei-nerh-fe-nerferm- -d t nder !h' A_r e R }3:14. There are no agreemen to or understandings between the parties regarding [his matter except those expressly ae[ forth herein. }4:15. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties and each of them. }i:16. The parties hereto hereby declare that they are executing this Agreement in Full sett lament and release with full knowledge of its provisions and after receiving legal advise ae to their righ to from their respective attorneys, and declare that each person executing [his agreement 5 in a representative capacity or on behalf of a principal or public entity is authorized and empowered to do so an by doing thereby binds said principal and/or public entity. >`br17. The parties have cooperated in drafting this Agreemeo[ and neither the Agreement nor any provision thereof shall be construed against any party in any construction or inter pr eta [ion of this Agreemen [. 34v18. Except for [he agreements set forth above, the parties hereto do hereby mutually release and discharge each other, their heirs, successors and assigns of and from any and all claims, causes of action or demands of whatever nature, anticipated oz unan[i cipa[ed, known or unknaw, incurred on or before [he date of execution to Chia Agreement by the parties hereto, including, but no[ limited to, all cla ima, eausea of action or demand which are con [a fined in, or may arise out of or be in any vay connected with Ch fie action. 19. Nothing in this agreement aha 11 be cone trued [o prevent any party from bringing an action to enforce the provisions of Chie agreement. In say such action, Cbe prevailing party shall be entitled to recovery of [be reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection therevi[h. 6 38:20. The pa r[ies hereby agree to execute any other documents necessary to effect [his Agreement. Dated: 1985 James E. Banks Dated: 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga By _ Jon Mikels, Mayor Dated: __ , 1985 City o£ Fontana By Nathan A. Simon, Mayor Dated: , 1985 San Bernardino Couoty Local Agency Formation Commission By Chairman Approved as to Form and Content: &ICBARDS, WATSON, DREYFUBS b ALLARD, BNELTON S O'COtiNOR GERSRON Wynne Furth A Professional Corporation Gary C, Wunder lin HY BY Rochelle Broome, Attorneys Attorneys for City of For the City of Fontana Raacho Cucamonga and James H, Benka Alen R, Marko, County Counsel San Bernardino County By _ Clark N. Alsop, Deputy County Counsel, Attorneys for .the Sam Bernardino County Lucal Agency Formation Commission 7 ' National Forrest Boundary ~;, _ ~ ~"~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~~ ~. ~ ... ~ ~ y r~- ,_ ,: _: _.. I _ _ -_ /~' I! ~ ~ i - i -. ,, .. `~ m i .1,~`" - ~r,-~.. i i _.v /.m/ i " .. _ ~'~~ii i ~ ~~'v r =' L:. ~ I _. IA ~ ~ ~~~ / .- ~ ~me.,,,,. ~ ~ _ f -__~ "._ _ _".,~ ~ ~'~ it •;,. ~ ccv~s~~ ~I ~ ~ ~ •~ s. _ I _,.,.~ ~i ~ 'I- ,< ~ - ~~., v ~~~~ _, ',S'~~~\ .~ ~~ _.~~ ~ ¢~ i e i'4 Cur~ont.Qgrichq'iCu ~ha'Imoriga c4~y bounaariea ~i" ~~~ N i ~-4' II ~}-~m~ ~~~ iii ,. _"I~'i ~e a., i, ,'~ lip,, EXHIBIT "A" ... 9' ~ ~ ,\ I ~ i~ ...,.. ,, --- - I ~ ,~ I .,..:w i q l E%NIBIT "B" The City of Fontana will solicit and seriously consider the concerns of [he City of Rancho Cucamonga in the preparation of a Specific Plao and Environmental Impact Report for Mnexation Area No. 114. Generally, input from the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga will be solicited in accordance wi[6 the format found in the "Scope of Work" which follows. It moat be noted that the format For the "Scope of Work" included herein will change somewhat as a result of negotia tious with the consultant ae lac [ed to develop the Specific Plan and Envizonmental Impact Report. Regardless of any changes to the "Scope of Work", [he fo Bowing points of input and/or sharing of products will occur: PHASE I Teak 1: Programming cesa. City of Rancho Cucamonga staff will be invited to partici this meeting to clarify Rancho Cucamonga'e objectives and concerns. o The sumsary report shall be made available to Rancho Cucamonga staff. Task 2: Research o Copies of reports shall be submitted [o Rancho Cucamonga staff. Consultant vi 11 meet with representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to retrieve informs [ion on factors which may impact the development of the Specific Plan. Task 3: Synthesis Taek 4: Alteraativea PNASE II Taek 1: General Plaa Amendment Nothinc required if consistent with aereement. Task 2: Refinement of Fiscal Report Copy of the draft Piacal Impact Report will be sent to [he Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga. Task 3: The Specific Plan The nurnose of [his [ask is [a~rod ice a workable plan document. o Draft copies to Rancho Cucamonga cuts) alternate land use,~lans. o A summary Repoz/Copies to Rancho Cucamonga Staff. Pr be t thr a (3) alternatives to the Rancho Cucamonea Citv Couneil at a workshop sea i n for the a rpose f obta in ins formal recommendation. o A copy of the draft product will be made ava ilab ie Co Rancho Cucamonga. Submit circula [able draft EIR/Plea/Copies to Rancho Cucamonga. Submit final document/Copies to Rancho Cucamonga. (RANCNC) Task 4: The Environmen[a1 Impact Report (EIR) Po¢tana shall seriously consider those environmental ieeuee identified by the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga and the County's Enviro®ental Review Process during the anoeaa[ion hearings sad aubeequent Litigation. Pontana will also seriously consider those ieeuee effec[i¢g [be community of Etivanda. Pesch of these ieeuee will be addressed by the 6nviro®enta l/Specific Plan Consultant retained by the City of Pon[aaa. l~D~'~~p~~{11~~T'~ll''Il1~'+7~-~q -~ 7~7~c~T~~pq .~~.i'~lJTd .L~,C il d~~l `v :Vil~J d dlll~~' O BOX 3S • 6673 AMETHYST ST • NANCHO CUCAMONGA 91707 17141 9E 7.75]5 March 15, 1985 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 ATTN: Lauren M. Wasserman RE: Fire Defense/Master Plan Study for the Foothill Fire Protection District Dear Lauren: On March 14, 1985, our Board of Directors approved retaining Hunt Research Corporation to conduct an independant fire defense/ master plan study that will identify life safety and fire pro- tection needs as our community continues to develop. The final document will provide us with an excellent tool for our future planning and necessary expansion. The study will include a recommended level of service, number of fire stations, optimum service areas, future staffing and equipment needs, the optimum cost effective delivery system, and additional data to assist our District in determining our strengths and weaknesses. The Board of Directors feel this study should definitely be utilized in concert with our efforts to form a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for fire protection. I am con- vinced that each project will compliment one another and add tremendous validity to our need for expansion and the revenue necessary for capital improvements, equipment, manpower, and operations when such expansion becomes justified to meet the demands upon an approved level of service. The Board of Directors has directed me to approach the Redevelopment Agency to gain authorization to finance the cost associated with this fire defense study through our revenue in the Rancho Redevelopment Project Fire Protection Fund. As you know, we did not utilize any of the revenues, as previously approved to fund consultant costs associated with our previous Mello-Roos election. Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency March 15, 1985 Page Two I would request, that the Redevelopment Agency approve funding the Hunt Research CorporationOf00rjOdefeTheirt proposalt isesomea twenty thousand dollars (520, what less than the requested amount, however we are now plan- ning to utilize Hunt Research along with our Mello-Roos Con- sultants in several developer, landowner, and community meetings, that is not specifically addressed in their original scope of work. we feel it is extremely important that a fire defense/master plan study be performed now to address present and future impacts, identify potential levels of service, and formulate a plan for future fire protection and associated services in our community. I would appreciate your cooperation in addressing this request at the next Redevelopment Agency meeting- We would like to proceed with our planning as soon as possible. If }•ou have any questions regarding this request, please contact me. Also, I plan on attending the Agency meeting to assist you in addressing any questions they may have regarding this issue. Respectfully, r L. Dennis Mich el Fire Chief PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES March 1985 COMMON ITY OEVE LOPMENi BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CItY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA Jon D. Mikels, Mayor Charles J. Buq uet II, Councilmember Richard M. Dahl, Councilmember Jeffrey King, Councilmember Pamela J. WrighC, Councilmember MARCH, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. Introduction I II. Standard Form 424 2 III. Statement of Community Objectives 3 A. De scri pion and Ase ssme nt of the Use of Previous COBG 3 EnCiclement Funds B. Comprehensive Stra cegy/SCateme n[ of Community 6 Objectives iV. Community Development Program A. Project Descriptions B. Maps V. Housing Assistance Plan and Nousi ng Action Program VI. Citizen Participation Requirements VII. Ce r[if ica ti ona Q° GL}CAMp~C9 t '~ a / r O O ~ z I. Introduction ~ ~ a 1977 I. INTRODDCTION Section 570.2 of Che Conso lids Ced Community Devel opme nC Block Grant Regulations identifies the primary objet rive of [he Community Deve lopmenc Block Grant Program as "[he development of viable urban communities, by providine dace n[ housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, Principally for persons of lcw and moderate income". The three-year Community Development and Rousing Plan and [he one-year Community Development Program, which together comprise Che su6s[ance of this applic a[ion, have been pre Pared to address [his primary goal: ° The needs idenc if ied center on the major Problems facing Che pockets of older development within [he larger, rapidly growing City; ° The strategy developed Dy [he City is designed to: (l) focus eff or[s within these target areas; (2) upgrade Che existing housing stock; and (3) improve inadequate and substandard public improve menCS. W iCh ch is approach, the CiCy anticipates meeting [he goals of [he CDBG program, inc Luding elimination of blighting inE luences, preventing the spread of blight and de [eriora[ion, and supporting Che investment of public and private funds in rehabilitation. As required by federal law (Section S7U. 301 of the regulations), the Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives was made available for public review prior co the public heating held March 20, L985, ac 7:70 p.m. in the Lions Community Center in [he City of Rancho Cucamonga. A[ that time, the City Council will co nei der public comment on [he community objectives and select some o£ [hem for funding in 1985(86. Legal notices and display advertisements were published in the Deily Aepor[ on February 22, 1985, co inform citizens of the hearing and solicit their input. A description of [he Block Grant Program and public hearing date ve re also published in the spring issue of GtaDevine. l ~~° ~~c~MO~c~ t '~ ~ r 0 0 F ~ z il. SF 424 U 9 1977 DYL .......1 .. ~ _. _ _ FEDERAL ASSISTANCE L ^'^+' ` "'""LL L arAn ~ . xunlx GNT'a \/A '~/µ i \/d 1. Tr•L a ^ rLINLl1tlIl01 n r- uYt\ ~ • art L wl[ r... ...r. r.r IDfIIR "cTw ~N1lIGT10M ' .««\ (.I i ualON i g rl'N 1 : ~ 7 1 Is EsslcL[o Is r.Y ^ L0fI11G1gM M IelEllf ILL31 ~ r... 1 Lppllf A aE[l7Ll KIIDII YWY l ILGI AI•LN.MtgLdIIbIT L f[D[ML Wl01[N ID(llfiflG nON NO, . Llrl.rlYr. f.ity of Rancho Cucamonga ~I ~a D11•Irl. ur Planning Division I, atrrn.o. r P,O. Box 807 i reo- . Ylrts ~I ~4 ~• f2 h ~ 8~ '• q Rancho Cuc aronga DNY- : San Bernardino'; `"'~" I ` °~ ~1•~ ~ California a111M. 9730 i~,w Corvnunit7 Development • a.-Y rN.[. INS n[to Krnut it I [.Iwl ~ Bluck Cran[ ¢ IN4Wr Md !7741 Uft9-IAii L ml[ :WD o(aGlllmon Or IIIR1CNIr[ YNOIEtt ~ L iYrL D( NrL1UN1/NECIh Ent IFIN..W 1-n.41M«M«IYxWI~ '~ 44~W 1-Ixr Nr D I ~ ~ (..LW DNnrr ~Vb~ "~"_ fYx •IIr.Irx4 Wlx a~iaNL 0/ 1WIt 111N[E ' M«Y LIY Olrw.u i t1«. Nxn Wlxlr/' 1' J _ L NYA y rNOKCT IY•KT INrw g rr. [rrxlxn LL [abWT[D NOY~ '~ IL IVK W NMYGLION arNN rl ecN or r[L10NS i ANw 4Yww [-MIYW~w ga rEnvttlro '•+.r u-w..«~ Ciey of Rancho Cucamnn g 65, 000 crx rrrxr.xH nD~~ ~ n harotrD runmrA a wHGnslaw anwcls are Iai..L ar (MNCE In.... x Irl • 10LLR .M • .rhIGN1 \ rgNC( ~i Mlw MY. I-0IYI Iir.x111: "~ ~ MUw ir Dr«w \ [rhlrANr w 35 35 ~ I ~, ox«x. • O[IE w K rlq/CCT L1ANT I q. nMrtR 11i'rr'w' DNi[ Y~ rY\ 4V ' oYI4aN1N ENx .rY~ ~T'T lL h~ ' I l rtix WIx411 I~ 11A5 ] I I 19 Yw(Y ' ~ ~ ... e lxlt ,p[ 1- tlTIWILD GTL TO >.r .wp YI , IL 1115rIIW I(OUlll IDCNIIRGfION NDY!(N rl 5D«YIILLD M I. no[ o w rEO1RNL AWNLTY a 85 5 31 ~ ft-8>-MC-06-0566 1 ___ . __ ____ as rLOwu iasner ro Nacur[ LLOVpT In..NCR«aw.11)r41 il. 11[NnNNe •oDLD Deg[, of Housing b Crban Development, Los Angeles, C.1. 90057 ~ fllw .~,7f Nr LL • N O. IYI M w LwY1M. N W. \ M rw«x[ M OM GIW Ma .n w«n.lti N rrnr«. «•r.x N N .v. r. RxFr Y Y Yy Nn'«NYIYIYn1.11Y w I «I.II.Y Y««.. Y w.wllYr «rIN«+r w' YI r.r.r u..IrHI. rY.r YYrIr. a THl I «w YI rtrO. Y..snN Yr r~ AIr[IGIA M xYrW Y r rwNrw •rr r e[\Tlnu r.r«N.n .rrrN.r rMl YNrr DI So. California Assn. of Governments ^ ^ Tlui sr M nr [luw ~~ r r YW a0 San Bernardino Assn. of Governments ^ ^ IU 5 Resea ch ^ ^ ~ u • nRL L[11/ [EL by \ IYw1/IIY . wniluNro _- IIMEI MnW lon D. Mike Ls, Tr +•' W tU/Af1Va Ma •nr B k ND[![CT NAYL 'il»MUCM Yr rW 4. x(CEIVID Ir La ORLANIUIgMI YMT D. .LDYIIWtgbW OfrltL Sl f [O[ML rrrtIGTION I IDLNIIirGIION - A ~~ A I[OIIUI ONANt rytNtlfIG110N i LL ACTMN TMLN 1L NMplq Twr MY W .. >L Y.w Nwl\ M Q L aLVr1 L4NTIn0 [. IINW .00 '' lL XOTION Mi[- D DE/L 11 - '" p \ uau a AMIURr sa conrAn ron NaDInaML I nioN[u. ri~ rr x~IL r.r 0 a L[aWYL NM ., aIATi a HON IN•...J uNrbr rrxr i uiTi~ '~A 11 y r_lo[[[ A yyy i Li. x[Y.NNL NOOEO L LYWI riLNiLL ,p~ M ..~. III[N rw W, Yr Y•Yw\ rlrrNr nw rw w. • rtstLU [(Un rla pnclN. - rLDLMI ADLIIDT ~ r w. • ~L~[/ rNr«N. N I. rr. r~l~ r M 1. 0W WYIY ML INr.. ul(14W,« «. r N LY Itlr Y H Lw1 «II\ MIL NCTgN gL.N1 srLNOAND rwY [:[ rAU I ao-nr h~ll[•[•r GfA.IM«Y~I~II~.Y lr1 `~ ~lo III. Preliminary Statement ~ I`z of Community Objectives 1977 A. DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSNBNT OF USE OF PREVIOUS CDBG ENT ITLEHENT FUNDS 1. Fiscal Year 1982-83 In 1982-83 the City received $360,000.00 which vas allocated to the fo ltoving grog rams: ° Housing Rehabilitation Program: $ 84,000.00 ° Neighborhood Center Expansion: B1 ,000.00 ° North Tovn Street Improvements: 120,000.00 (Cents[ and Maxine Streets) ° Contingency 17,387.00 ° Local Costs of Program Imp lemen [a[ion 57,613.00 The City's community development objectives for 1982-83 included the following: I. To develop a program capable of eliminatin g and preventing slums, blight, and conditions de [r ime ntat to heal th, safety, and public we lEare that can aid in preserving housing stock for people of low and moderate income. II. Continue Ci[y efforts [o eliminate conditions which are detrimental [o health, safety, and public ve lfare, alleviate physical and economic distress through the stimulation of private investment and cosmuni[y revitalization and improve the quality of community services. II1. To expand and improve the quantity and quality of community services, provide needed neighborhood and community facilities and reduce the isolation of senior citizens living within [he City. the programs funded by [he City for 1982-83 are consistent with the City's objectives. The housing rehabi li [a[ion program directly meets [he need addressed in Objective I; the North Town street imp roveme nta satisfy Objective I[; the neighborhood center expansion carries out Objet Live III. The programs are also consistent with [he broad national objectives specified in the "maximum feasible priority" certification. The housing rehabilitation program ie intended to improve substandard housing, thus slim ineti ng alums and 61igh [ing influence. Per[icipat ion in [he program ie also limited to lover income households, or families with senior citizen or handicapped persons as heads of household. the neighborhood center expansion is targeted [o senior citizens in [he City. The street improvements will directly benefit residents of the North Tovn to rge[ area, a majo ri[y of whose residents are lower income. 2. Piacal Year 1983-84 In 1983-84 the City received a total of $437,000.00 in Community Development Block Grant funds which were allocated as follows: 3 ° Housing Rehabilitation Program $ 70,000,00 ° Neighborhood Center Expansion 297,000.00 ° Fair Housing Services 5,000.00 ° Contingency 5,000.00 ° Local Costs of Program Imnlemen[a[ion 60,000.00 The City's community development objectives for 1983-84 were similar to 06j actives I and III from 1982-87: To develop a program Capable of eliminating and preventing slums, blight, and conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare that can aid in preserving housing stock far people of low and moderate income. I1. To expand and improve [he quantity and quality of community services, provide needed neighborhood and community facilities and reduce the isolation of senior ci [ize ns living within Che City. The Housing Rehabilitation and Neighborhood Center Expansion programs are consistent wi eh Objectives I end I1, respectively. The Fair Housing Services program serves to eliminate and prevent conditions detrimental [o health, safety and public we lfere ae identified in Objective I. In to rma of consistency with [he national "maximum feasible priority" objective, refer [o Che discus9ion above regarding the 1982-83 program. In addition, the Fair Nousing Services program provides mediation services in landlord/tenant di spu [es. The resolution of such conflict be nefita low and moderate income Eamilie s. The project also provides information and affirmative support for state and federal Fair Housing Lavs~ consistent with Section 570.601 (b) of [he regulations. 3. Fiscal Yeer 1984-85 In 1984-85 (the current program year), Rancho Cucamonga ceceived $467,000.00 in Community Development Block Grant funds which were allocated as follows: ° Housing Rehabilitation Program $ 60,000.00 ° Fair Housing Services 6,000.00 ° North Town Park Si[e Acquisi [icn 150,000.00 ° North Town Serest Improvements Phase 150,000.00 ° North Toun Street Improve men[ planning, Phase 15,000.00 ° Contingency 15,000.00 ° Local Costs of Program Implementation 71,050.00 The adopted community development objectives for 1984-85 are: I. To eliminate end prevent alums and bli ghe and condi bone de trimentel to he aleh, safe [y, and public welfare while preserving the housing stock far people of low and moderate income. 4 il. To provide information and affirmative support for the Fair Housing laws of the Stale and federal gove rnmen[s, in support of the goal of ensuriro cF.ot all r_stden[s hz i, ce oe sa to a decent home in a au i[able living environment. III. To provide neighborhood parka and recreation Facilities in low and moderate income neighborhoods in order to support rehabi li cation of those areas and in order [o meet the needs of the residents. Creation of these cents ra for community activities wi71 improve the living environment in [he surrounding low and moderate income neighborhoods and support the prevention end elimination of blighting condicions, as required under the national priorities. iV. To el imine to hazards to the public he al[h and safety and provide ac rest improvements in areas terge cad for housing rehabi li[ation assistance. Priority in these improvements is being given to areas whose residence are predominantly low end moderate income and co repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus improving the living envi ronmen[. The Housing Rehabilitation Program ie conaietent with the first objectives Fair Housing Services implements [he second objective, North Town Park implements the third objective, and bo[A North Town Street improvement proj ec to add rase the fourth objective. All of the proj ec to ere conaie [en[ with [he national objet Give of giving "maximum feasible priority" [o Drojec to that benef is lox and moderate i nt ome households end/or eliminate alums and blighting condicions, Rehabilitation loans and grants are available only co lower income househal de. The No r[h Town and you chxest Cucamonga target areas in which all of [he capital improvement projects ere located have over S1X of the residents in the lover income cetego ry. Nell over S1X of the City's 1984-85 Community Development Block Gren[ expendi[u rea will direc [ly benefit lower income households. B. COHPRENENBIVE STRATEGY (BTATENENT OF CC~UIUN ITY OBJECTIVES) Although [he exact amount of the 1985-86 grant is not known, i[ is estimated to be $420,000. Funding of all projects aubmi tted to [he City for consideration in 1985-86 would cost approximately $1,600,000. The f olloving statement of community o6je cCives end programs reflects the priorities of the City Council of [he Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga established aC a public hearing held for [he purpose on Harch 20, 1985, (see Section VI ). City policy regarding the CDBG program is [o designate at least 51 percent of the entitlement funds each year Eor programs which directly benefit persona of low and moderate income. 1. Housing Maintenance aad Rehabilitation (existing program) Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need Co continue City etfo rte [o improve existing housing stock [hat does no[ meet building or safe [y code requirements ye[ is basically sound and can, with some improvement efforts, continue to serve the housing needs of the City. Buba[andara units are not concentrated in one area but are ac ette red in ems 11 neighborhoods throughout the Ci[y. Objective: To eliminate and prevent slums and blight and conditions detrimental to health, cafe ty end public velfere while preserving [he housing stock for people of low end moderate income. This is in direct compliance with the national objective of eliminating slums and blight. Only low and mode ra [e income households ere eligible for loans or grants, which is also in accord with the federal regulations. Programs: The existing Housing Rehabilitation Program offers deferred loans and below-market interest rate home loans Co pe sons/families of lov-or-moderate income and home improvement grants for minor projects to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persona throughout the City. This program is managed by the San Bernardino County Office of Community Development through a contract with the Ci[y. Funded ec tivities include: ° Outreach/public information; ° Home improvement loans; and ° Nome repair grants (senior citizen, disabled, handicapped persons). In 1982/83, $84,000.00 of [he City's Block Grant vas allocated for this program end $20,000.00 vas expended. In 1983/84 $70,000.00 was allocated end $42,000.00 was expended at the end of the year. In 1984/85, $60,000.00 vas allocated, end to date $40,000.00 has been expended. In addition, all of the funds from [he 1983/84 program year have been expended. This increased performance is due co expended publicity about the program put out by [he City end to [he addition of deferred loans to the p rogrem. The need ie clearly there end [he funds have been expended as targeted. T. Community Services (ezisting and new programs) Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need [o provide recreation facilities ecceseible to persons and families of low and moderate income throughout the community. Objective: To provid¢ neighborhood parks and recreation feciliCies in low and moderate income neighborhoods in order to support rehabilitation of those areas and in order to meet the needs of [he residents. Creation of these centers for community ac Ci viCies will improve the living environment in the surrounding low and moderate income neighborhoods and support the prevention and elimination of bli ghcing conditions, as required under [he national priorities. P ro grams (a) North Town Park: development of a neighborhood park in the North Toun target area. This is a multi-year project. Si [e acquisition and planning were funded in 1984-85. Novever, no vacant aiCe of at least five acres ([he Ci[y standard) was availaSle. Therefore, the Community Services Department is working on en agreement with [he School District to develop a park on their land adjacent to Rancho Cucamonga Middle School. Funds are requested this year to comple [e the park. (b) Sou Ghwe a[ Cucamonga Perk: acquisition and development of a neighborhood park in [he Southwest Cucamonga to rgec area. This is a mutt i-year program with only Bite acquisition proposed Eor this year. (c) Cheffey-Carcia House: Restoration of [his house co serve as a local museum and centerpiece fora small park. Foundation and roof work ere proposed for [his year. (d) Lions Center Expansion: This is a multi-ye er project involving the construction of a 6,000 aqua re foot addition to Lions Community Center co improve services to [he entire City. 3. S[ree[ Improveme n[s (new prog came) Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need far certain public improvements in neighborhoods which have been Large red Eor rehabilitation ass'.t. nce [o pre van[ and eliminate blight and deterioration. These improvements would reinforce private efforts and eliminate hazards [o public health end SafeCy. Objective: To eliminate hazards [o the public heal ch end safety end provide scree[ improvements in areas [a rge red £or housing rehabilitation assistance. Priority in these improvements is being given to areas whose residents ere predominantly low and moderate income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus improving [he living environment. These programs will further the national goals of eliminating alums end blight and prime ri ly be ne fitting low and moderate income households. Programs• (a) Nor [h Tow Street Improvements including rec ona[ruttion of the street and construction of curbs, gutters, aidevalke, and driveway aprons on the fol loving subs [andard atree ta: Acacia, Belmont, end Eighth. This area ie predominantly low and moderate income. This is the construc [ion work co complete the project whose planning and engineering was funded [hie year. (6) Sou[hveet Cucamonga street improvemeo ts, including rec mnscruction of the scree[ and cons[ruc Lion of curbs, gotta re, sidewe lka, and driveway aprons on [he following e[ree [s: Via Cerri llo, Placida Court, Calaveres, Vinmar and Sierra Madre. The City Engineer has divided the neighborhood into three areas. The cost of improving local streets in each area is estimated to be $250,000 oC $750,000 Coal. 4. Public Services (new programs) Needs Assessment Finding: There is a need for public eervice targeted at special groups of lover income families and individuals who are not able to function ae independent and integral mamba cs of society without assistance. Objective: To yrovide counseling, referral, emergency end ongoing ee rvices to those lower income members of society who have special nee de in order [o permit Chem Co enjoy independent living. Programs: (a) Rolling Scart provides counseling, referral, emergency re aponee, ince rpre[ers, etc. to the elderly and dieab led [o permit them co live independently. (b) Concerned Citizens for Community Improvement provides emergency and ongoing food, ahel ter, counseling, training, etc. to permit the poor and homeless to join [he mainstream of society. B ~~ Gv~M~Nc9 f n a ~ r IV. Community 0 o Development F ~ z Program ~ a is~~ rvm +...~ eu\w.\ V 1 O11.Y1Y1Mf °I NONIIp .ND Yw1.M 01 VILOIUINI 1. N.YI 01 •.ILIL•Nl .NVyq COYVVN~f•OCWlMY1NT I10011.Y C'C' o Ranchu Cucamon ~a C •wLIC•T~04r0\•wT NVYCIn -ROl[CT tUTAYIIq~ e-85-NC-06-0556 Ifllloy 0/.MLKURRr -- IwoY TY O wwm°w,ome Julc 1, 1985 June 30, 1986 O •YINOw4/, o•TLo C. M.YL O/I\ONCI I.IIIONLY YVYICw IINV1110YYI4T•L wC V11Y1.•TVL Housin Rehabilitation 1 Cale orical Exclusion • IMTITV YIIN wINOM1111LIlr IO11 C•wIT1Y00VT TNC IwONCT •. TILI.NOMf 4V V\Iw (714) 383-3897 v Yuuo.;IN Or I\owcT Continuation of a Hous inR Aehabilitat ion Program that offers below market interest rate loans and deferred loans, to tower income persons or families, and home improvement grants for minor repairs to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persons. Activities funded include: nu Creach/public informa- tion, hone ir.:provement loans, and emer Kenc7 repair grants (senior ciC izens and disabled onlvl. O ONLI i/tmINNO aw INNwew/ p/pll/ Ir101rrlcn, 11, CL41N Tw.L)ILINNVYIUTION O~ITwICT111 20 ll and cit ~-wid i ible households V •NTrur.no •ccorLRNYL NTI Home Improvement Loans l"> each Horne Repair (:rants 'S each ^ UR1 I/LdlnrWdMWbMnY 0p1lII<tl IR•Ln. li WIO COMIGN/YT •CTIr~T;11 IIIOOPIY YLN(yNOi INYWVI I/L~ /lN/TI~YY+N </nrw wl•w+N<r;FMYYw COC G 01MC11 Y I/r 1, (pp CVYY1Il, I\m, MVO~Ipl.J LOwIV00 ILNCIIT OTNC• ICYC/IT •WYNI COVNCf IN M kl IN 41 outreach/public information 1 5.0* 1 0 1 0 _ Home improvement loans 40.0+' 0 0 __ Home re air rants 35.0* 0 0 11 T-1VI 1 80.0 1 f : f.~,y(:Y~ •.,~,;v , 1! ieW Can TOM-W W;tll Cawwwwvry Dwllovwlwl lNS1 Gr/nl ivA ly/rn 11 C14nY111 <w L/ i 80.0 MNY</Y~w MUo-wlf 1. r;ellar/r ryp W Mpl '__.-.._.-. *Pret iminary estimate of funds dis[r ibut ion; funds may be a!luc aced in varying proportions among the individual activities. rw,~ •r/..,., eY• ». . W OV•NTYaNT O/NVY/~YO .NO Y+IiN NYIIYrYIwt •MY•\LO.YYN~rr owa\wwnrroe+•Y r. M•YI UI .114L.Nr City of Rancho Cucamoq a MaECi EI1M{I~IIN I. •N\IL1TwN/O+.Nr NYY+IN a-85-MC-06-0556 1 r[+wo a •n\K•Lnnr 19 anal+u to ! • I11OY Jul? 1, 1985 rn Sune 30, 1986 . w ^ INYxION, O.TID O •YaNOnNT.emo • M•YI O. I+OIIC. I. rNOMLT NVYN. forth Town Park 2 I. LMVI+OMW NT.\+l VxN1T..Vl review completed • /Ynn.x«wwOMmuT. row c.++riro our rNarrowcT Citv of Rancho Cucamonga /~TI\II,wNa NVYIIN (7l4) 989-1851 •/ oau.nnoN O. r+own This is the second year of a two-year project. Las[ year funds were allocated co purchase a site for a park in the tiorth Town area. This year, funds will be used to develop a park with a lighced ball-diamond, sand area, picnlc area, etc. (see attached plan) O Owe• NrwlWNwn w wranewe.wnl w•Ibcn. u. nNlw++•ttmn»wlLnwN m/rmenw x •Nnu..noNCwwua,.Yaen Development of [he 4.8 acre park. O Olia MLannnwe on •NNW w/!U W /lucll. ,l Lo/L COwoN/Nr •ttrvnwa 1110Gwp Y[•+IYMOJ I+wrrvl•gr xnelwru,wl r/naw rwllwiw MwNwrw ww» COL D OTN/+ . rr. •. Lori suw.+r, ra,., NUe.laanl \pw,YOO NNOn OTN// LINLar •YOY»T LoY+ca W W kl IO 1.1 ark dove to men[ E150.0 s 0 ~ 0 1C. t/Wa ilso.o t a EO :i~hi~.; ti:~,~l '. IE ToW Can TL 4{Ww'~e. CeNlll+/«tT DaMOprYnl ~la+•Grana illnb lL+//CW.Y.1 nJ t! E Yue rer x w MVwwIw.MWIEI{1.MM• ~ L( ~fl ~._~` O O m `` C~ •\ \r iS l.`I YOMY.NYI _ ,~ _ I ~____-_ _._._.. _ _. Y V 1 f ' ~ I I o > € ~_.. _~ ~ -~ J O o ~ ~~ -~ ~ _ .I ,ii3~ ' 01.~~~; fill ieY MUYM~ - .Il.. _ ' _ - i-~i~ h~ P"~ i_ - is I .rl ,my ti -,y ~..~_ ' I ~ 1 _"~ 111_ '_J, _ .~ I` 1 t,' ~~~1 ~'t ~' i~~ ' rl. ~~ .ij ~ ~ ,~ .~' '~~, q}. t„ i I _. 1 1~ ~ .~ ~~ ti 7. 1 ~ T y~_~ . r __ Irr..e.w_ ow w. n•la~ V• Ol/NI+Y(w+OI wpV11wO.MO VI1.•M Oa VILOrYIYr ,. w.Yl VI .ML,CMr •wMV•I COLYIVM,rr Oa VLLOLYLMr /1,OOV.Y I.1CV Jf RanChO I.LLCamUnga MO1FCT fBMM~lIt B-8$-"!C-06-0556 1. I11u00 01 •MLKMM1Rr _ a • /,IpY 10 ,µ O•Nlwa ra/WI O III V,./OY, O.+10 July 1, 1985 June 70, 1986 O waYOwwr. o•+10 I, Y•YI OI I,IOMCt •II,ONCr MVYa1• I. aMVI.OMYIMr.L.1V1a,Y1t•rV3 3 Cale orical exempt ior. 1, Iwnrr wOw N VOM,.ryHr ron c.1111r,Y0 OYr rwa r.OnO I. to IVMOwt YuYLII, (71+) 989-1851 r1 OIIG~Ir IOw OI .eONCI this is Che second phase of Chis project. Last Tear, design and engineering were comp leeed. This year Acacia, Belmont, and Eighth StreeCS will be reconstns Ced, with curbs, gutters, sidewalks and drivewa7 aprons. This project will continue the effort to upgrade public improvements in Chis predominanely low and moderate income area. O OIS1 NCenMIYNM INWNpW o111h/ Yb IfRII. O. Nwtb +w•C+Iwawwuumr oY+bC+lp l a •wn<NUm•ecarul.rlhn Remove existing substandard surface (where it exists), grade and reconstruct ehe. s't reef s, and construct curbs, gutters, sidewalks and driveway aprons on rlc ac ia, Belmont and Eighth S[ree[. O (Tsl//eme,wNNm d!'1anY ppelll YM IT{Ir. u <ow carrowarucnrlrna MOWwrt••IUww lw ww,rn /r 1, 1l.rrwY.+w.I rLwnw ry w.ww MNNwlb lw.w 001 0 OTN111 w M•. cVtT lVYY.eq /rwnNW~AR.I lOwV00 Orq• •YOVMr \OW<1 /a Marl 1a Y11,r 41 ~l kl hl fN StreeC recons[ruc tlon f 1$3. f 0 f 0 le. Tech f l53 . f 0 f 0 i.1e? ~ ti~4. ~, I! TeW CeaY Te M 1w wow CYwll..un D..NUVIYm f~ece Wawl FYA fSY* eI Ce4,wiY 1 eY/ ll f 153. 0 MMww IwN wVa3ell.3,rna eaar/w AM p VM•1 a 0 __ o m '`.. .. -` . ~ C- ,`~ i i _N ~~ m E ° °' o E .. L N Z ,~^ V/ it~Y 1~ ~. i~l, ~ r 1 ,~ i _ it _ _ I I _ _.~. . I 1 ..... .. .~-.~ ' i ln~'/W1tM4) , ~~ ~ ~ ' I i L ,; ~ _ _ _ - ~},~.,I - ~ , ~- a } I I o y _ M I z _, 'a M ~ I ~ I YF a J ,-r r M i3i = -F _ ~~~ ~ C i ` s _ ~[ ,~ i _ ~L_ '«w _ ' , _ ~ s n _ ~_ a ~ aJ ~^ , I ~ i ' _ i ., m , ~ , ~ ._' ~ ,'I _I _. • .~. 1J~ ..~ , ~ rl"r. t, i ~~li I'+}q~,pr~worv i~111. ~ `\ .,, J . , ~ ~ - _ ~i ,~~ ~ I _~~ r /' ~~~ 1 , _ ~ ~` .. ~ 'i7 ',._ I J_ ~ 'i. ~~ I . _ _ _ ., J-- ~.~~ rr,. wwr.+. Y.< O<IwNTY<NT Or NON~NO.NO V N\YI O< W rMY<Nl .NNYwI <OWVNITT O<V<LOrY<NT INDp..Y 1. N Wa OI .r.LK.NT Glty of Rancho Cucamonga ~newGT{~Anr a .AL1<..N}rNN.N.NVYN.N B-85-MC-06-0556 ~. /[nroow wnLlcwuurr ® rwOY Slily I, 1985 ro June 30, 1986 ONglwLarNNTrrI L. O wavlaroN,wTao O wwNwawr, onao .. Nwra el rwown <.rwown NUwu a.awvlN nNTwL wr IaNn wa ~i ~ i Southwest Cucamon a Park 5 env onmenta ew rev • <NTITt NIIN w«IOwi<ILIT. ION C.wNVINOOVT TN<INOA<T ..T<L NOYa.VY<a11 Ci[ of Rancho Cucamon a (714) 989-1851 u MaennwN Or .avower Southwest Cucamonga was r~cen[ly surveyed to determine its eligibility for colmnunicy improvements utilizing CDBG funds. Over 51% of [he households were found [e be low and moderate income. The area is a target area for residential rehabilitation because it has older homes and subs Candard public improvements. Development of a neighborhood park (approximately 5 acres) would support public and private revitalization efforts and provide for the recreation needs of the area. o aNl« n<w,wNlaeaa.<anawaw/r.lrle.mrn. n, tawNTU(TUI/<NVYIN.nON OI<TwgtUl 21 o wwncnwnoNCroaw\o.YCan This project is too complex and expensive to accomplish in one year. Site adgv isit ion and planning are proposed for this year, with development to fallow next near. 0 ol.<. ncrlaw.»a4Yno+Naw/hlaN Naaali. O <ONO COMONa NT w<nvlTlaa awOOR1Y Y<ww IYNDI IgrwMMU kNr rl~rwrV rNNlr. NiNa1r+•Nrllnrr wNw CM G OTNIN Y M1r., <OfIlUYY.•Y, INrw MVO.JOII,I lOrYwO «w.lT OTNaN .<N</11 NrOVNI <OVNCI 41 N kl M Irl Slte ac visit ion { 300.0 { 0 { 0 a. tall { 300.0 { 0 { 0 ": #!d W.: c~Fil` ' 1S ToW Can T. M ~I.14 Wean Col^^NwNh MwIOMYwI ~~ GrYll iw0 (SINN /I CalvnYr 1 rr0cl { 00.0 nwlrw lrr..wW1~1<.I.1/~a .OYYN A~ N Wal NI/O IA<1{1<I e~ ~ Proposed Terpet Area .~ . <t~ M . ~~ ~ ~_ -- 0~. MY r i ~~ ~ LM -, ~ ,. ~ _. ' J ~ 1 ew ~~e~~ ' 9 s~ eel eel t_ k i 1+f. i <« -=_ _- No Scale Neighborhood Park ~ _ - ~GfX Southwest Cucamonga rrw w.r+.. o wJ w,e, VA OII.NTYIN\OI MOW~Np .Mp VwEM[Y VEa(IIYtY\ r. F.aYt pI .MIIC+Mr .MN V.l CO44VNIlr pI VtLWUwrl+ppll.u C a .^O~tt ~•^r I .NIIG.\IO4MII.nl YVW 1• e-85-MC-06-0556 1 IEwiOe or wNLKM1UTY '- +~~ orrolNla tswlwwl •woY ro O wtrwoN.omo July 1, 1995 June 30, 1986 O wtNO.rtNl.ow+to I. w.YtW lwpNfr I.IwOIt C\NV41t• I,EYYIIIOYW N1+l wt Vltw{1.IVf 8outhwesC Cucamonga SCreet Improvemen s 6 Categorical exemption I IMTI\r MrN w1YOMIMl111 ION C.IIw\Iwp Wl 1Xt IrrpNC1 I \t L{I,pMI wVYttll Ci[v of Rancho Cucamon a (il4) 999-1851 n eltcw4neL Or .wertn SouChwest Cucamonga was recently determined (by a survey) Co have over 51'/, low and moderate income residents. It is an area of elder hous inq with substandard and deteriorated public improvements. Reconstruction of the sC ree CS would support public and private rehabilitat ien efforts in the area. O Wc1 i/eme/NNd mtdtlNwWtYlrhlMNesk u. ct wow rornuNNUruwnor era¢nu 21 n Iwnu..Ttn weeoww.w wn Remove existing substandard surface, grade and reronseruct Che streets and cunse rucC curbs, gutters, sidewalks on Via Carrillo, Avenida Vejar, Plac ida Court and Sierra Madre dvereae north of Arrow Iiighway. O ONt1NmllinrNJ On tOblgnY NtP/tINllltk. ,) CpNO <OWONtH wC]rvmU INpprlw 4.N WM0: l+NWIN NN ftn rr+YwwrNw..Nw w4y wwNN NYwwYw 4+ww COW O\NIw +Jfn4 (rY/1UtNV1/Y, Iww wVO.letJ.1 aewr4pp olwtw IIMErIT Itrltrll wYeyNl WVrICt IJ OI kl NI IY Cn ineerin + lans t 25.0 t 0 t 0 Sereet improvements 225,0 0 0 11. Tet/t t 250 0 t 0 t 0 ~. .. ~ 5,{ : 4ty. . ~ ,, 1S. tow Cae TI Y IYe w~II Cawwwnlq CNYaowYwl tlte~ Grtnl FYY Rum NCdunw • r10 r/ t 250.0 Nrllsw•wlwwArl.l.MawNeYlww hp « ~tR1 NW loll N111 s~ ~ Proposed Tsrpet Area uuu Siroeb to De Improved ~ ~ '~ ~ re M ~ .~ .f~- ,, - _. ~ ~ - t - ~ ~~ _ ~,,. - ~ ~ ' i _ ~ + ~ 6 ~ LM e ~ ~ ~ - -r i ~ - - u ~ r ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ MH ~~ , _= = ~ No Scale Street Improvements -Area 1 Southwest Cucamonga ~~~ OYr Me .f •~i V 1 Ol1•NSYl N+01 MONINO •«O YN. /I OI VIIOrW Y1 1. F.YI VI •NI,C.Mt City of Rancho Cucamonga •YNU•a wYYVNnt owlawYawtrrtwr•Y r Nnucu~o«ro..Y3NwaN MOJEGt {IIeaMA11r g-gj-MC-06-0556 ~- f rlnioow •wl3c•aurr • f3 o•ww•lrr ra rrwr To r 37 wrnnoY. o•oo Sulr 1, 1985 June 30, 1986 O wtNOYwt, o•no I. Y.W OI INGMtt •.INOACf MVMrt• S.IMYIIIWYIMt•l «t V11Na+.+V3 Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvemen s 7 Categorical exemption • wn+rwlt«Nnrorlmur. roN U«•riwoYt rwurowcT enurwoNa NU«n• Citv of Rancho Cucamonga (71+) 989-1851 w oaacnnwN Or r•ow<T Southwest Cucamonga was recently determined (by a survey) to have over Sl% low attd moderate income residents. It is an area of older housing wieh substandard and deteriorated public improvements. Reconstruction of [he streets would support public and private rehabilitation efforts in the area. O per ilem3erwAen rANeaIW pa/Itl rn0 rrlt.. I, c1 NIw •N•rnnroNwa«.no« mn w~enw 1 2l y •eT~brum•cwYra«wYlYn Remove existing substandard surface, grade and reconstruct the serge is and construct curbs, gutters, sidewalks on Calaveras Avenue, Salina ~\venue, t'in Mar Urive, and Sierra Madre Avenue between Arrow and Rinth St reels O (/IaeI/CP'1en3wJaw w/A'naN~prplU rW Mao. ,) corn COWONtM •prvmp rNOGR•Y r{rA IYYN L•w•w.Y1 r11, IINr sYMMlw««M,w•r •I«w rlfw.~w•w, CD1 G OTNFY w rr+•. (OJT IUYa.eq Irrw NYD~roVJ low,YDO o+q• •WV4 mY¢t tl N11p It«IrIT hl N kl Iw Itl Cngineer Lng b Plans f 25.0 f 0 3 0 Street improvements 225.0 0 0 ~/. 7e1,,, s zso.o f o • o S i1\t~!«: 1r:~3 , 1{. TeW CaD Tr M-W wiw Caw«rnln ~raelJOlNllltfNtr Grlm FYrb ffYN UCWww {tw0tl f 2 Y..n n3ar Y wi IYwww IYN NUpAI{.3, rw1~•D{aMa ryp q ~1{r3 _~ No Scale Street Improvements -Area 2 Southwest Cucamonga ~~ .ww,rr._ oua we o wum ua oP.wrwlrr or «Owrp .rOUM.wav1\ArWw\ r.wW101 .nut.«T w«ru•a cewu«n. owaaorrwrrwopww Cit of Rancho Cuc Amon a 1 .nllC.r,Owp1,IV\ 4VYrl. iN10HCT /IMJMAf1Y 8-85-NC-06-0556 a ~ . r rwow \o . o wi«.a . r~rl O wavulor, o.wo Suly 1, 1985 June 30, 1986 O wwwo\ra«r. o.no .. M.Va 01100ACr 1. r110ACT M1VWa• J awVl«OMYJ«\/.L wI VIJM Jr.r Vt Sou[hwesC Cucamon a Street Im rovemen s 8 Categorical exempt ien • {wnn wOwgNOMUM1tl•roll c.wwv~«O OYr lwa rwOAC\ LrLLPr0wlwmalr City of Rancho Cucamon a (714) 989-1851 _ ra OJKwwr~OMp r.OMC\ Southwest Cucamonga was recently determines (67 a survey) to have aver it".. low and moderate income residents. IC is an area of elder housing with substandartl and deter icrated public improvements. Reconstruction of Che streets would support public and private rehabil ita[fon efforts in the area. O CMTI it eO+1AVN On JAF'IJaW OJJIhI anJ rfuM n, a«aw rw.rnunrwar.no+euTw~ow 21 N ur¢o.no.ccou«ur.«wn Remove existing substandard surface, grade and reconstruct the screecs and construct curbs, gutters, sidewalks on Calaveras Avenue, VinMar Avenue, and Sierra Madre Avenue between Eighth and Sin[h Streets. O CMCJ!/crntlniAl on aaanoww'pgf~I Na anAll. O coat COwra«trr rcbnbfy Iw(g111,u.U~JY«Oaw Pw,.w1NL nr\fl,wrnVl wN..r.. wrr l.ww x~l\..riw Mw co w oTraw nM4CpfTfulw.oq lrw, «uD.gtl aownoo orraw .ww«r aowcJ KMIIt as Nar,T Jx 11 kl III bl En ineec ing S plans / 25.0 / 0 / 0 _` S[ree[ improvements 225.0 0 0 -. ~ ` _ _ N . Tout ! 250.0 / 0 / 0 r1 iitrj.v~ ti,%k IS Taw Can To iV 1aA Wiw Camllwnlry DrraleVwlnl /lafo Ti\Mll ilp ILrw N Co{AVw / rM J! / 250.0 MVwwltrw wuD\{l{.\. /~rl,w COrrw 1'a/t N TI{e\ ram Pra POaed Terpet Aree uurr 31reeH to e• Imorovsd ~ ' .~ . ~~' ` M ~~ ;. . ~, ~ ---- ' Y{+ err .~ 1 1 V1Y 1 ~ ~ ~ ` i y LM ' ~ ~ ,. ~ -~ - } ~ ~ - ~ _ - -~ ~ ~ - --- ' y.r ~• ra yy ra 1 - a ~ _ - _ H 1 ~ 11~ H _~ No Scale Street Improvements -Area 3 Southwest Cucamonga r~~ 1w. Iww.Y• VCOII•N\VlN\OI NOWIM .NO V.1.Y pl VaLO1YlY1 .YNV•I GOWVNI\r OCV{LWWNr IwOON•Y \. N.Va 01 •wL1G•Nr rrtV Of BdnChO CUCamOnga MOttCTfUW~gY a •wuc.noNmw.Yr NUYau B_95-MC-0556 t. nw,opw u.ucwlun ,C~ - IIgr1 July 1, 1985 t0 June 30, 1966 • Ail OIIgIN•L kO /WI ^ IICVICgN, O•\a0 p •w YO11a4r o.rlp L Y.Yl O11NOx Cr •Iwpx Cr NVYa1• Handicapped signs 4 I.CN VIIIONYIN\•L •I VIaM1 1\.r Vy Categorical exemption 1 lNTlr\VItN IICMONCgILItr rOw Gwllrlq Wr lW IbMC\ w\aLllVpyC NVYLIN 7l4 989-1811 4 pamnnnow or .noxn Older shopping centers have handicapped parking spaces designated by blue pain[ but they do not have signs which cite the section of the municipal code reserving [hem for Che disabled. Without such signs, Che Sheriff's Depar Cmenl cannot ticket offenders. Froper[y owners are reluctant to erect [he signs and [he City cannot require them to do so. Provision of [he signs would make [he spaces more visible [n disabled residents as well as per- miteing enforcement of City code provisions. p ONCa i/evnHl.Yew.aYWSrW Mlrhl rN lrt~M n, uNa1x \••nwxNVYU•neN pxrwlrntl City-wide \a •wiiC~1.\l0 •CCOML~1NYlN\a Placement of ZO-30 signs in shopping centers around [he Ci[y. ^ 01rt1!/epnenpae ow •OO'norW rphlW tl[s•, II cp.O COwON[Nr .C\rvlnal 11100144 gldl luNpl h. wrlM 11/r fLMewYYwn\YI.w1w YNVnY~1IwYnNY Mwr C01 G OrNIw w M•, LOJTtVYY•11, Inn NLq.roll.l LOVY00 IGNIIIa Odaw 1l Nlll\ •VOVN\ NVNC[ IM N kl IO Irl ~ 5.0 * 0 f 0 te. ToWa f 5.0 ~ 0 ~ 0 : 4~tY!~ ~ tij:Rr 11 TOW Can T1 M ~W WIA CYNgwh MgNVwlwl /qN Gr\[ iwN lS1111I/ Ca411w OIN [I / 5.0 MlYw rr1111uawnrA.M~wolwY ~ O( p[[ ww .~Yn. r.w,...~ ww w b Nl/I VJ WIw11TwN101 MY1I1NO wNO Y11\YNV/LOIY<Yt wwnuwL COtrunnr owLLOrwwrwowul t. N.Yr OI .MLK.N. CiC of Rancho Cucamonga MOIECT i1MAM/Mt a wwLrcwrloNmw/Nawwl. B-85-MC-06-0556 /. r/wloON wnLlcYUrtv rlpy July 1, 1985 r0 June 30, 1986 w~ oNAIrwL •rw rr! O MVI/N)N, OwraO O wwNOr/Nr. o.no <. wr/er rww/cr •rrowo rtwm Lions Center Expansion 9 r. /wnwonrtnrNa MVnw/Twan Review required • LNTIt. rlrM 11<MON<~<ILIrV I00 fJIlIiTINOOVI rN<rMA<T Cite of Rancho Cucamon a /.1<L/rNOYI r1N<I• (714) 989-1851 4 NKwwT10N OI rNOAb The Lions Communit}' Center is the central building for recreation programs in [he City, It is not large enough to handle all of the demand foz -rograms within the City. In order to offer more classes and a wider variety of classes, seven additional rooms are needed. Block Gran[ funds will be used to fund only a Portion of the total cost equal to the percentage low and moderate income users of the Center (i.e., residents in Rancho Cucamonga). O Ois/ iI mnlY.wd w wU.osW oNrrU w Anew. tt, aMU<rwwerwnNUruwrmwomwlnur 20 q wnTKnwnoNewr•LnwNewn Expansion of Lions Center to provide space fo: recreation programs for all income groups. ^ ol.e/n<e,:wr.ert./mrwrst.nlwA/.+1. t/ <e/c COtMOMNt Krntrl/a rwOC11NY V/M IVND/IM wrr.w NL /(M fI7I~If1Yn}Mr M.w NfIMIY II.r~ /N G OTN/11 4Mw. Lo/r /VYrw Nr, Irw NW~M).! LOIVYOO NMrlr Orr<• NNVIt wlgVNl <OONN 4! W /I/ W NI i 136.0 ~ 0 S 414.0 Park development q. 7/Wt i 136.0 f 0 f 414.0 ~ : W y~: ~ r,Y,Aa 1t 7eW Caao T/M/r/wlw Crwwunlry Ww~op.Iww ~b</Wrlt flw~IfNw OI (.wYTM/w<1I 136.0 Mlww lrw, MVDwI/.1. wI.P<Wtwlr ~a(r O( WII ~'"'~""~'••~• V i t Q r v o 0 r °o ~ N \ ~~ I T C C ~ N E a p x U W C r O ~ JV ~ i . ~ anv iaYtl , ~ ~ ! I. ~: I _ _ _ -. .._. .~ - - _ i ~~ ~ ant tONYMU3 I I I ~ ' .....-.~ -- I-'^ _.,.. .. ~~J.~ .~ E I o o . : ; ~ o i Y 3 Z ~- ..a ~ ' I ' Sl O NI N J ~ k rl N~ CI C __ a - =.,11,' '~/,-1 x,,111 ant N3AYM ' - ip .?.. -- _ i_ II .. _ ~~ I L_ L] ~_g1tNIN011~ .utl ,, __. y ,._.I'r i ~II 3 ~ ~'LJDM1 ~~. ~'Ir 1, .I .1 .+.r .{ .~ r J ~ y 1 ~ Il IJJ .~ ~ _. ~ ~ - `~ IY. r~ y ~1 ,, -- ~ ~ ..~...-- 1. YwYt 01 M~~~~+' VA DIIwwIVIYr OI NO1w1YO wNO WON Da VtLWwY\ kin -}IO l'.nCalftOn d •MVwI IAWVY11r Ot VlLMwwl O110011wY 1. MwLM.1110Y/OwN111VV1\• MW[eT ~~T ef-p~85-NC-06-Oi56 ~~ ~. 0111100 OO YwL1VOlutV V..Y/ Owq~YwLI~IrI \o O nvmow,e.\w~-~ aacr June 30, 1986 ^ lwwowYr. Dwrao~-'--~ Ju1}' 1, 2985 wtwown NUVYP LYevIwaMUawilL wtvlh+alwrla Y Ywra Dr rwowm l0 _~ ~~ Chat tev-I,a.=•~ ~~ --- -(714) 916-75'L .MOr rllN IIaPOYOIPIIrt .OII CNII V IMOOY. Ma .MMP Ec iwanda Historical Soc iety wa<IN.ooY O. Iwowa reglonafEIt hascbeeno givens to the~Citvnb}a iewie Hrmestand wlilli betmnvedf d e Soc ie Cyw isl seeking fundsKrowrescere Che2hoosetforTuseF aswanlocalsmuseuml in a sra11 public park. 0 wd arld lrlill la 1w11U./tW aCCOMLIONYINtO Construction of anew fourd Cect the proper[yrwhileh~es[orat ion ist in of a temporary fence to p progress. (~ pwfemw1iw11C aD a0O'Iiwltl OalM1l awd ~~ aYOO\IN vaww /IIYW Iw wwN++11 M b wONIYr acllYlrnl GOb O\MI/ 11. sow cD emevNM'^I IeNwIw wN~"r MSOnrr. w~l LowoD o\wa• Wu/e1 IVI\11ww1. IAMIO.lQ1) wreVwr r M 4 ~\ alNaalt O1Na/Ir fi1 N M1 M w z Et iwanda H t 11.3 f 35.8 5.8.6 - - Hestorat ian _ Society 1 1 f LL3 ~ 75.8 538.5 :«;~',: r" Ie. Tatah gCYrvllwlw~d 147.1 I5. iaW (qae To M-aYe Mill CDIwwwllYn DwMuo^II^t SIaA Gram IMM /SIYI' _. .__,..... M ~ MM' rN...v..r 1 1 w oo••\YaNr ar wwr,Na •«a w•w wr.wrw«\ ,..•n o. wue•«r U«Or •w••a•Y•«r rwoow•Y Cit of Rancho Cucamon a •Nww.caYY .. MlK•\~a«x••wr NUY•Cw ryµp~ty qty ti-BS-NC-66-Oii6 i. rC•ICa 0I YICK•~.U\Y •.~ D•IOM•l1«M Yrr1 rwax .a O wcvnw«, o.no July 1, 1g85 Sune 30, 1986 Q •wwawNn o•vo {, Y.w o. •wow c. ..rNOnt. NUw.• ll 1.NVINONYTM•l•.VL'1 .1•\N{ orical exclusion Cate Rolling Start g •«nrr w.r«n.+owaY.m row aaw•aw oYr.w noxo w n.uvNaN..u..m . Rollin Start Inc. (7i4 391-+679 ». wrcw~nwN w ••oxn Rolling $tarC, Inc. is anon-prof lC agency which provides equipment and services to permit and encourage the elderly and handicapped co live independently and function integrally in our soc ien~. Q pNrl NCOiIN.w/a•r?~MM/WI•/W WIfxw __._ 1l CCMN \•.CfIMICNWC••60N al•\MCrIN City-wide u •wnar•vo•ccov.u••r\«\• Provis ton of (.) information, counseling, and referral services; (?) t. if el ine emergency electronic equipment and answering/response services; and (';l interpreters, talephone relay, and counseling for the deaf and hearing impaired in Rancho Cucamonga. ^ P•N Haw•a•ada•wMlnaiW pylN •waM~•. 11.I •.aa•.Y Y..11 •UNpll~• wwwrl 11 1 1Y1 1f. ikW COYra..Nr K irti MRV•Nr Fw, CaCl a aTNIw IMY1rwOM•N wNwYw r/ MAIpjt C1M1.C.Y, IAMyPJ4J.l CaNrWO a.wCw ~~~ puwC\ NNV.\ pNV.\ IN M k1 MI 4/ information b Counseling f 1a•0 j - f _ Lifeline emergency services 15.7 - Deaf services 8.0 - f 33.0 t - t : 'ky'+a(w~ \.7yµ` N. T•W. 0•rdacwwM tNa (•j1Yw tYrYk IL•w a/CM.+.N. •wNlcl f J3.3 tS. Tevl Cwu TaM aM Wia,C«mwrymly wua >or ~• lC~ µNYaw rY+ww~n.... ~•...~••• ..~ .+ Inln 1p V~ Ne u nm V { O(IpRTY(MT 01 M011EIM0 1ND UN\1M D[ Vf LO1YlNl 1. N1M! O) 111LIC1Ni 1MNYIL COYYVMITT Of VfLWY(NT IROOp1,M ('.lt of Rancho Cucamon d MOJECT {VMMARV ~ 111LIL1TIONAp1NT NVY{!R B-82-NC-06-0556 !. IFRIOD Oi 1NLIC1tl LITr ~ (. OpIOINNL IWN yWr) M OY TO O REVI\IOM 01Tfp July 1, 1985 June 70, 1986 , O .u[4D4FNT D1 . nD •. MAY[Oi INORCT •IROIf CT NVY\Fp )ENVINON4[N11L R[VIEW STITVS Gardiner Auditorium Rehabil iCation • lNi1TV WITH Nli10NS1\IlITY 10p C1ppYINOOVT TNL IROIiR • TiLEINON[MV4\(R School Discricc (714) 984-6671 Ip pEiCWIITION O/INOIE[T Gardiner Aud i[orium is the only facility in Che western valley region of San Bernardino County suited for major col [oral events (symphonies, etc.). I[ is used by all the residents of [he West. ~'al ley. T'ne structure itself is a fine example of public architecture built during the 1930x. It is in need oC remvat ion Co con Cinue its usefulness -par [icularly rep lacemen[ of [he existing ceiling which has been determined to contain ashes [os. o al.r nLDRD.W Wn op fOM~paW qpl,! rM,)[srn. 1 CEFEV{TR1O1\I/EMVY[RITION ObTgCT1[) Entire ci[ li NNTICII.ElED 1000W 11{NY(MT/ (1) Covering or removal and replacement of [he ceiling and upper portion of the walls. (2) Rewiring and upgrading of the electrical system (,3) Repair and upgrading of [he stage rigging ^ U,rElELbinmwd on f0linanYOfE\h1 W)e Effa'II. O CD\O COINONEMT ICTIV ITI[{ IppDpAM YE1p iUNOi Ln ll,q,w6eRl IE NI NImW~IWI/n\w wIY IW~IIWMNYl. Nlwn CD\G OTN[R xI IWLE, COSISUYYAp Y, lWw MUD.HMI.! LOWIYpO OTNFp \\M(/IT \[N[IIT 1YOUNT EOVRC[ 41 pl k! 1/1 bl Rehabilltat ion 1 9.6 1 30.4 1 220.0 Other cities, San Bernardino County, and the School _-._--_ J2istzict- 11. Tod( f 9.6 1 30.4 1 {iiYyt, ~ c:;~;k: , IS TDW CnR TDd/M WIDI LornmYnM ~E(MDDN+\t bbd GnM fun6ISLm D/CN4ma/n/s/ f 40.0 pgl{LN,oNN NVD.AIE.I. NNIDI IL OYYew r(1( p/ T\I[{ MVD IOM IOIEI ._...._ out Nu N wu~ UlOll.wtYl+r Ol Ngq~rO wNO V11t.rOt VIaOrWNr .NNwacerrerarDwuww+r rweoww r, r1W Or YrLIC.Mr v Rancho Cucamon a MOJ{Ci WNMMIi /. wtrtwnorrow.rr rawu g- -MC-06-0556 I. riwgD Or tlrLKwQIItV [~ /DOY July 1, 1985 -- 10 June 30, 1986 •. Owrolrwl lwr•raq ^ wtVl{10Y. O.ND O twNDwrr,s.rts •w.wwrwowrr Concerned Citizens Eor trwDACr NUwtw tCMY1w04wh1.L 11IVOO bNVy Categorical exemption t. twnrr~awwtvowglun rowuw+nND art rutrwwm Concerned Citizens - William Swain, President t. nurwDN rwuw _ N. wtcwntwr or nOxer Concerned Citizens for Community Improvement is a non-prof iC agency which provides counseling, referrals and emergency services far Che poor and homeless in Los Angeles and San Bernard ino. Thev are seeking to expand Chese services to encompass the Rancho Cucamonga area. ^ Ctuc11/lwwtlrl+OM /Itll'tvrWayrlN N//IWM. Ir pwNrwwOllMwwtwgroY O,OwNTIN CiCV-Wide n wwrrcnwnDweeoranNwNn Emergency and ongoing counseling and refers., to the poor and homeless on housing, food, education, jobs and jab [raining, medical care, etc. O OK/Mnnthw/M MYNalr arr/tl Wlrtd. \t CDNI COVrOM1CNr .C11VIr,LL rwwwAY Vlww /1MDt lrn ww+.r ML /(Yrr.nrwYnllM,rir l~.t rr~rlM1••MIVI CD/ 0 OTMLw p IV11 CDtVtM+rw/Y, /r+III10./lrl,/ lOwN00 ttwnr OtMlll NNtIp urourr buwp W N kl !W HI Counseling & emergency services { 27.5 { - { u. Tw1/I { 27.5 { _ { : ~a'-': ~ rw4. . 1!. TDW CD/r Tw M-/it WlllGwwWt/OnNaMNw1 {INt GItnl fulY lLw NCabmr{Nt! t 27.i IMrrw tw+rW~101{I..wA~+0lwrr {qr el 1/111 •••••••'~'~'•• i i ~~ c~~`MO~,c9 j {~ a J r 0 o V. Housing F ~ z Assistance Plan ~ a rs~~ - U.S. Department of Houprp ant Urban Dewlopmerw ' ~T ~ Loa Argelea Me Olfcs, Regbn IX ' ~ 2500 Wilsnire Boulevard Loa Argelea, Celnomla 90057 '`~~ l r; ', ~ .I :~:7Y CF 5!';iX~' rI;CAii OA' .: :'C limit: fbr~O rPfNI CEPGA tdA't 1 S 1893 'A~ i I !i 13&3 AM Honorable Jon D. Mikels, Mayor 718r911011111211f2f3191a16 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Mr. Richard Marks, Associate Planner P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 9:130 Dear Mayor Mikels: Subject: Community Development Block Grant Program 6-83-MC-O6-0556 - City of Rancho Cucamonga Approval of Housing Assistance Plan In accordance with 24 CfR 570.306 and current instructions, the Area Office has reviewed your Housing Assistance Plan for the period of October 1, 1982 through September 30, 1985. Based on our review, we find your Housing Assistance Plan to be accep- table. It is therefore approved. Accomplishments toward your Housing Assistance Plan goals will be reviewed annually as reported in your Grantee Performance Reports and as a result of Area Office monitoring of your City. Sincerely, ohn TL i~ ~rvArea Manager 32 M U6IARTMENT OP HOUSING ANp URBAN DEVE LOPMFNT I I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM I ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM r HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN B fR01A: October 1, 1982 TD: September 30, 1985 ~ •. owr of wsMluloN w. 1 '.'.Y 1 3 .\pTil 1, 1983 OOrlginfl ^Revision ^gmendmmt Sq^rv.ora„monno OMB I Ipfnl PART 1 - HOU5INC ASSISTANCE NEEDS TABLE I -HOUSING STOCK CONDITIONS STANDAflD UNITS SUBSTANDARD UNITS SUBSTANDARD UNITS SUITABLE FCR RERA! TENURE TYPE OCCNIEO uNR! V•CANT uNITi OCCNIEO uNlT9 yACANT uNlif OCCVPIEO uN?s Vf.CANT Toift LovRr lncwn L~•iTs • • C O E f G ! Own<r 1J 887 43 I T Renter 2 597 TABLE II -RENTAL SUBSIDY NEE 03 OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS ELDERLY SMALL FAMILY LARGE fAMILV TOTAL 1 / K ! Ver Low InmmE 4 38 _ 1 ~ r 9 Pttrxnt % ~ % 10. L % If,J% to Otner Lown Inmme 102 n ETR __ t] To be Dif IELed to Topl 1102 1E PEItSnt % o % % 100% PART II ~ THREE YEAR COAL TABLE 1 -UNITS TO BE ASSISTED REHABIO FTATION 9JBStANOMDUNITS ryEW CONSTRVCTION CONY ERSION TO STANDARD UNITS HOME IMPROV EMENT$ L M N O 16 OWntt ]j t6 Renter U (UNITS EXPECTED TO ASSIST LOWER INCOME HOUSE HOLOSI 1T OWMI S t! Renty n TABLE II -LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS TO RECEIVE RENTAL SUBSIDIES' ELDERLY SMALL FAMILY LARGE iAMILV TOTAL f o n f I HODMlgidf to W AairtM 16A 113 16 lLi m PttaM 11.0 % 77.9 % 11.0 % 1EA% TABLE III -GOALS FOR HUD RESOURCES SUBJECT TO LOCAL REVIEW AND COMMENT ELDERLY $MgII FAMILY URGE fAMILV TOTAL T u v w t Houwnpids to W Assoted 0 70 5 LS L 45 I I 45 I 45 33 PART III -GENERAL LOCATIONS .A ANfN mf07dfnfilYillptM PMnllae•tionf o/popoadfssirtw7 houfinp. ~ ~ I ~ ~ a 5 ,~ ~ . a O ~ ° .> ~ t O V ~F c N O ~'1 O~ O ~ j< Q ~ r W O ~ • C JJ O O OO • W ~ u . p O = ~ r ; ~` ' L ' ~ . ~ ~ a ~ ~ ! ~ _ 6 U { ~ ~ ~ O ~ j L - Ft v1 .y N N O L V G O J O N F ' oG m m o o ~ ~ o H~ u n a a : ° . a j ~ _ ti L L L 7 7 S W p ~ w ~~~z J W m O O LO ry ^ I 2 ~ C_ 0Z Y "1 ~ON~ `O ~ ~ _ W~ $ H J :~ =' @ ~ ~ ~ ° + $ c ~ x = 4 F v3 '~ i `e ~ ,d, } _ 3 ~ ~ _ < u u M1 C ~ ~ ~ _ N ~ = ' E E 2 < E e w a 0 = _ _` a o p o : ,. ~ L , u~ ° i~ ~ 2 b! tt Q 6 W n w N z2 ~ w ~~ C C q e u z o q ~ ~ ~ 3 w .v L ~. u Q t - Z ••• b m° c p ~ o ~{°. ..~ u.q. N ~ p q U V ~ ~ d F 1 1 _ g ~ b~ 3 d d d C d Q .t h S y y 7~ V q q eJ m L g tl n R~ O C C ~. ~ I q O O O l 9 ~ m I o g q Y ..1 iJ Y~ W 9 O ~ O G C C C C O H O r I S [ ~ ww.~im n m ~ LL O ~ D 2 q u u ~ c 2 ' d m v d -~ a O p y y % .~ > E > Y J ~ m Q L ~ O C V m • < 1 6% ao n n .I G L C y ti :l ti ~ p 1 ~ o C K vi n 7 n O ~ ti R O~ U V df y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2~ ~ 0 d p C p 0 0 0 ~ ' m V U V~ u L A r 34 FooLlotc to T.il~li~ II anc! Table III The coal shags only 1G units for tl:e elderly cersiscent •.uith :i:e ~.r%- portion of needs and available fiu:ds. Ths qwl is coo sma 11 ~ alla:' ~r a feasible senioz citizen project. A goal large cnaiyh to acca'rodato n feasible developrnt, in order to raintain proportionality by f:-milt' t; ~~:, would necessitate total goals which are extrctaely unrealistic both in rela- tion to reed and to available resources. Therefore, if ~~ assisted elCerb; hcusing develepnent is prcpesed, the City of Rancho CucacronGa ::ill consider amending its iIAP to acca^ncdaee the project and o:i11 at Lhat ti:.e rcwest ~ waiver of pmportic:ality reauireamnts baszd on reason„b1e level of effort and past perfor:;vznce. 1 35 Narrative on !?ousina assistance :seeds Definition of Substandard: Units which do rot ;:tet local buiidlnr cede, •.: ^,ic`.•. standards exceed [he Section 8 Ecistirg hou,ino quality sta,dards. Defitition of S~utjvhle for Rehabilitation: Substa:~.dard utti is whit.^, are st:uc- turally sound an3 for which she oust of rehabilitation will rot exceoc'. the 1a:er of 803 of the reriacanent cost for 803 of the rarket vabre after re~abilitation. - F~:ecte3 to Rside by Ccr-..n^e~t Parrs: The SG',G :•.c<;:o:.al Y.ousirq Al iocat:gin bdel snows a total fair share for P3ncho Cccscnca of 336. :Tie xr- ce~t allocated to each fa.:ily t}~e i5 bascsi on a distribution obtained fror,. HCD, ~!~, fer the current erected to reside fer "Re-ainder of Saa 9er..~rdino Coc-~t}•; which i^eluded Rancho Cucaconea. - Basis for Data: 1) 1980 Census infozraticn pzepazed by SCAG and HG79. 2) Substandazd Dni is Suitable for Rehab based on percentage of total substandard units esti.•vted by local rehab. progra-a e>cperience. 3) I.a.•er irca^e occupant; of units suitable for rehab based on local rehab program e~~ience. ~rpeeted Ir.2act of Conversion of R:ntal Housing to Corxicruriun or Cocasrative Ownershio• Srnne displace^cnt is presently oct.:rrinq due to cerdminium cvnversrons approved prior to 1983. N>nrori:ately i81 units mnvcrted out of X48 36 ~'~~ e cn t;ousing Assistance !:e©ds (CCnt'd. approved, .bst of the tenants rrn~ing are not f~~ti.lies M-i th ch.ldren and rents on the converted wits HCre relati~~ely :tigh. Rancho Clsa^onga's mrdanini~ar oidinarca 1Lrits com~ersions to no rote than one half the n~.ber of rntltifamily re^.t~l duel lugs addcrl to the housing stock during the preceding year. :ve addi tio.~al displace^~ent -- is e~cpected for the HAP period. 77 :tinozity Housirq ;:Mds Elack Lower incare households in substarrlaz3 F.ousina O:.^ter: 8 !'tenter: 1 Inver inccre hoaseholds requiring rental subsidies Elderly 9ha11 Farily Large F.1^uly 1 9 2 - Loser incrnie households to be displaced Elderly S`aall Fa.:ily Lame Fa.-ily 0 0 0 5.a^ish Ozinin Inver inc~ne households in substandard housirv ONner: 45 Renter: 13 -- Iwtr incaae households requiring rental subsidies Elderly 9;u11 Faruly t.arge Family 12 93 24 - Iaorer inmae households to be displaced - Elderly mall Fa^ti ly Large Fa:uly 0 0 0 - Mericar. I.,3iar„ Alaskan flati~~e Lower inoa:e ttou_seholds in st'ustardard housing owner: 3 Renter: Toner inmae households rmuirinq rental subsidies Elderly mall Fanny Iarge Family 1 1 9 2 38 i - ,,riey Housing Needs Contd. 1 Lower Ircme households to be displaced Elderly 5ra11 Fa^uly Iargc Fa:uly 0 0 0 Asian or Pacific Isla.^der Lower i,care households in substandard ho~sirg O~.ner: 9 Renter: 1 Lower incare households requiring rental subsidies ELderly 5.311 Family Large Fa.:ily 1 6 1 Icier ircmie households to he displaced - Elderly Small Family Large Faro ly 0 0 0 (Xher Minority Lower insane Fouseholds in substandard housing Owner: 23 ?enter: 5 ' t,wrer i:xvne households requiring rental subsidies Elderly Small Family Lance Faruly 5 39 10 Ic.:er incv~e households to be displaced Elderly Small Fnmily fazge Faruly 0 0 0 Minority data basod on 1980 census minority by tenure t}ape as a percentage of total housing reels. 39 /• Special Housina Heeds of Handicaa•.~ed Persons ~ IOIr' I':CYr~ EL.:uS 117::5. : rl)ING .tiSSISTnNG._T Single Individuals: 707 33 Pter.•~bers of 9-x11 Families: 912 42 D1a^bers Of Iarge Families: 101 S Esti^cates of handicapped persons based on California Decaztment of ReS:abilitation Statewide Study of Disabled, 1978. Flaw] on this repo: ar. esti:ated 3,674 disabled persons live in Par:cho CL•ca.;onga. tio~ever, about 1,720 of then have types of disabilities u;hich are likely to affect their housing needs, such as blindness, deafness, musculoskeletal ccxlitions, anQutatiors, deformities, mental retardation, epilepsy, r..,:1- tiple sclerosis, paralysis, etc. Most of the disabled aze rot in loser i~ca-ie households. The es[imaies o£ the nu^~ber who arc lower incrs:~e re.^.ters is based or. tl:e incidence of ]a.•er income renters in the Overall population. tote also that about seven percent of ttic disabled are also elderly. Ten percent of all rental units developai wrll be accessible to the handicapped. Special Housi^g b=eds o° Iicuseholds headed by Single Individuals •dic5 denel'ident children i,ccozding to the 1980 census, there are a total of 1,055 single parent families in Rancho Cucaronga cti.^~risirg 6. Bb of total households. A 1919 report by the Fair Housing Project called The Extent and Effects Of Discrimination Acairst Children in Rental dousing shvsthat farole headed families are renters 1.7 times as often as all households with children and tlat fenile headed low income renters with children tend to be inadequately housed about 303 (core often thah Overall lower income households in California. }lance, about 94 si.-:gle parent households with children are estirated to neat rental assistance. About Ida of all sin- gle parent households are fatale headed, and 225 are male headed, accord- ing to [he 1480 census. Other Scecial Housina Needs Done 40 %~ G,:ncral L~cat ions of Proposed Assisted I;ous i::+~ (see atWCi:cd :rsul '~[naanda", Census Tract 20: South of Saselirc, C~.ast of L'le xvore : rcc•.:a++, l:orth of ?ooti:ill i3oulevard, and [;est of EasC Avu:::c. The area is vacant wrth a specific plot: ~~clcrine muLti4av ly lend use catagories is currently afore is Ct:.y Council for adoptia:. _ ___ra Vista", °azt of Carsus Tract 20; east of Elaven Avenue, Nest of 'lilikca, &~pt: aE Base line and 50rth of :oc [hill Eo:ilevard. The area is vacant Land with an ado; tcc: ?1~:::zd coimts.ity ~r!uc^ i:.c'_udzs nulti faaily laid ices a::d ccal~ wr ~:i:0 lo•:~a:.d mderato- ircFe units (-clav &Oi of r.~~diaa inc :rn.; V'_c`_ccia", Bart of Cents Tract 20: Seutl: of Eiighlard, )9rth of SPiL4 cracks, ;'est of Eti::arda, East of Day Crzek. T!'.e area is ~ vacant uLamed ccrtr„u:uty ^:hicn trclsdes ''ultitar..ily la:.d uses an for •niiich of fordable l:cusi:;a goals and policies are :,ro::USed. "ba.`. Toan and "[lest Cuo~~nnga", Pari of Census ^.rcet '_l; North of anew, Nest of Archibald and ^:orth of the PaiLoad :racy Nest of Haven. Infill new construction sites are availalle and rehabilitations - opportunitizs are lcmted in this area. All scraices aze develec~d. "Cld. :lta [,aaa", Part of Census Tract 20: _ t•Iec[ o::~.rchiLuld, mast o: IIe1L~:c, ::urth nt [3aseline, Sout!: of lAth S:.rcet. :1us area is decclo vi with soon icfill }rowing sites available. - 4l V 0 a V O S O z a LL O F u 1 /~ \~ b O GI 00 M p Qr `^~ 0 O x t0 ,o q ~ o ~, m as V m O F~ H ~ „z d C7 • -\ I ..., y J ~ s ~ T a ~ ~ «+ a1n ~ ~ .~, ~ .. u ~t ~ m ~ C ~ U u i ~ C V o • ^ o ' _ _1. ' f •1 -- _ '?~3nY1M SITi, ° - ^ ~ ^ - ~ ' - - a., . - - _ a a-'.~ . - _. _ _ ^ , ^ .. ^ ~ I _ ~ r x O -~ t ~; ~ - u-N ~ il7)'I It•iy a•' -I_ Q JUG ~ IF~It~~¢ JT-i :J ~•' ,y ~h~T '~:::: -3 -'I•ii f'::C'' ..: J.?O rW.r.;~^'. t aMUN __ _111J_. .J ~{.. 1... ,r It~~~i'_ ll~.lA ~MliOi C III _ _ '~{_.': :'. _. [;t L::..:, ~4'c. -i^'-1111::::::: t0._.-- _ ~ ~ ~ J ~Jc C ~r.O _ i:i~i: ~r 1 T V dAi :::I(.'iR'.~ G ^ rr ~ ~ ~•.1'y U.S. Dpanmeell of lbuelnq eM UrEen pevNepment ~ Los Angaba dreg On1G1, Re9~on I% s j :SOO Wilsnire Boubvera .>, ~I Los Ange'~es CaWOrnia 90057 s{eoarable Jo r. D. Nikels, A.avo: "i_y o' Rancho Cucamonga :.1"FVR'^C1: Yr, Aichard Narks, ;.s sec, ^lic^er .... eox 907 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91770 Oedr Naynr Nikels: SUBJECT: Community Oev elopment Block Grant Program N0. B-B4-MC-06-0556_ City Of Rancho Cucamen~a Annual Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) Approval In accordance with 24 CFR 570.306 and current instructions, this Office has reviewed your Annual Housing Assistante Plan for the period October 1, 1983 thru Septemoer 30, 1984. 8a5ed on our review, we find your Housing Assistance Plan to he accep table and it 15 therefore approved. Accomplishments toward your HAP goals will 4e reviewed annually as reported in your HAP Performance Reports and as a result of our monitoring of your program, .Sincerely, '~.~t...~(~ .t ~, . [gn ac io A. Galindo " Acting Manager Eos Angeles Offfce, 9.45 43 ~ _1 NARRATIVE FOR THREE YEAR GOAL AND ONE YEAR GOAL Substandard residential units to be demolished as a result of direct Federal, State, or local actions: None Actions the Community will take to implement its one and three year goal; 1. Sale of Mortgage Revenue Bonds to provide 6e low market mortgage financing for owner occupants. Most users will be moderate income, none expected to be low income. An issue which will fund an estimated 500 mortgages has been sold. The goal will be realized, therefore, sub,lect only to market conditions and the developers' ability to develop and sell the homes. 2. By cooperation agreement with the County of San Bernardino, rental pro,lects in Rancho Cucamonga with 20 percent of the units restricted io low income households at rents less than 30 percent of income, may De financed with County Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds. 4e expect about 500 new units will be financed In Rancho Cucamonga in this manner or by City/Redevelopment Agency bonds over the next throe years. Developer interest is currently very strong; however, market conditions and developer performance will dictate whether the units committed are completed. 3. Rancho Cucamonga will allocate CDBG funds for rehabilitation loans and grants and for the "Senior Repair Programs. These programs are administered by the County of San Bernardino pursuant to an agreement with the City. 44 Narrative for Three it Goal & One Year Goal ~ Page 2 • ~~' 4. The City has entered into a cooperation agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino for the Section 8 Drogram. The goals can he achieved if the Housing Authority greatly increases its efforts to solicit tenants and leases in Rancho Cucamonga, as opposed to other parts of the County where Section 8 has been more widely used in the past. fie City will assist in this "affirmative marketing" to the extent possible. 5. The voters of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a referendum allowing public ownership or financing of low rent housing pursuant to Article XXXIV of the State Constitution. This enables use of public housing and various multifamily financing programs. 6. The City has entered into a Cooperation Agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino for use of the Public Housing Program. Although no new projects have keen proposed for Rancho Cucamonga, agreements are in place should funding become available. 7. Several of the Planned Communities in Rancho Cucamonga contain commitments to development of affordable housing in the text of the approved or proposed Community Plan. The developer commits to develop a portion of units for lower income renters at monthly rents not exceeding 30 percent of gross income and the City agrees to provide Incentives and assistance where necessary and possible. 8. Rancho Cucamonga participates in a Countywide Revolving Fund for land banking or other front end costs far law income family housing deve lapment, particularly public housing. 45 l .•• Narrative for Three .ar Goal & One Year Goal ~ Page 3 9. Twenty percent of tax increment funds from the City's redevelopment projects will be used to assist low income housing development as necessary and as funds become available. 10. The city proposes to reduce or ref mDurse fees and parking requirements for senior citizen housing. I1. By State law, a 25 percent density bonus or funds/concessions of equal value are available to any project with at least 25 percent of the units affordable to tow and moderate income households. Provisions to Assure that a Maiority of Dwelling Units to Receive Rehabilitation Subsidy will Assist Lower Income Households. 1) All rehab loans and grants are restricted to low income homeowners. 2. Rental rehab loans are given only far structures to be occupied solely by lower income renters and the projects are selected such that after rehab rents da not exceed 30 percent of~~tenant incomes. 46 c~ .~ W t e ~, 1 . O N ~ ry Q ~ ~ d ~ T .~ . N I U ~ I h ~ ~ ~ O I 1 ~ II ~ O > ,~ < I ~ E i g Y d o ^+ o Y, o o O 3 ~ '= I i p z V ] ~ ~~ ~: b _ y ~~ ~ O O O O O y III, a Y~ Y ( I ' 1 I t ~~ c z ~k o ~ O , 0 ~ N .ti N N O Io i 1 2 m : ~r o Y ~~ a i ~ ~'+ p K z 0 7 W . ~ 8 W : O O .` . n Z ® ~ `f 4l N~ F • : Y ~ i ~ „ r ~ ~ ~ Vf In O N O Ci .. ti o ID e~ ~ i Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . 2 K i( l( % _ ~ f 9 '~ 0 ~ O r i E > . j _ - ~ ~ e ~. 0 6 ^ ' € ? ( ~ N J1 0 I ~r NUO s ~ ~ L ~ .. i ° ., N d Departm°~ 0 Ci ~, Dion ~ ~ o , p N ~ ' j$ _ ~ . ~ ~, ; 83 ~ ~ ~ a Q.~ ~ r r ~ ~ 0 1i f d _ a 1 ~ W ~ w a ~ ' ~ E ~ ~ ~ a N N .- ~ ill l:dffl F . s ~- o Program f;i; u ~ 'a ~ . G !!! ff , . c c A A d ~ 8 g [ y A A L N ~ t7 5 ~ N .+ d ~ x ~ P {~~J _ g ~ + ~[ Fd adt 6 = O :• N i A OI 1^ ~ . p ia ~ c ° o o ~ ~ a =` ~ p p c c a O r ' m ~ m ~ t C 0 4. S ~ ~ A A q 7 N J N M M d C C i Y 2 > ~~ • ~ 6 YO d ~ + W ~ ~ L d M d O aC ^ C m t m ~ H < C E C! q C d d yG aw ~1 K / 8 H 8 ~~ O OC ~ OI d 01 Y U~ l~l ~ l N L ~ ~ 1 S 1 u M m po Lpp ~i U V U i i 47 VII. Certifications 1977 1 1 1 1 y r O ~ z VI. Citizen Participation ~9» J t:Rlt'1' 1 P t CAT I ONS The Grantee certifies that: (e) It pwsesses legal authority to make a grant submission end to ezeeutc e community development end housing program; (b) Its governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act a resolution, motion or sim filer action authcrizing the person identified es the official representative of the grantee to submit the final statement end all understandings and assurances contained therein, end directing end authorizing the person identified es the official representative of the grantee to act in connectigt with the submission o! the final statement end to provide such edditicnal information es may De required; (c) Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, the grantee has: (I) met the citizen participation requirements of S 670.301(eX2) and has provided citizens with: (A) the estimate of the amount of CDBG funds proposed to De used [or activities that will benefit persotts of low end moderate income; and (B) its plan [or minimizing displacement of persons as a result of activities assisted with CDBG funds end to assist persons actually displaced es a result of such activities; (2) prepared ifs final statement of community development objectives end projected use of funds in accordance with S 670.301(sx3) end mode the final statement aveiloDle to the public; IC) The grant will he conducted end administered in rnmpliance with: (l) Title VI of the Civil Rights Acl o[ 1964 (PuC. L. 88-352; 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.); end (2) Title VUI of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Pub. L. 90-284; 42 U.S.C. 3601 et s~.1; (e) It will affirmatively further fair housing; February 1984 I (f) Il has developed its final statement of projected use of funds so es to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low end moderate income families or flid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; (the final statement of projected use of funds may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and - immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, end other tinanciel resources ere not available); except that the aggregate use of CDBG [ands received under section 106 of the Act end, if applicable, under section 108 of the Ac[, during 1984-85 (e period specified Dy the grantee consisting of 1, 2, or 9 program years , sha principally Denetit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less then SI percent of such funds are used [or activities shot benefit such persons during such period; Igl ft has developed a community development plan, for the period specified in paragraph (f) above, that identifies community development end housing needs -- end specifies both short and long-term community development objectives chef _ have Decn developed in accordance with the primary objective end requirements of the Act; (h) It D following a current housing assistance plan which hos been approved 6y IIUD pursuant to S 570.906; (il it wdl not attempt to recover nny capital costs of public improvements assisted ir. whole or in pert with funds Itrovided under section I06 of the Act or with amounts resulting from a guarantee under section 108 of the Act Dy assessing any amount against properties owned end occupied Dy persons of low end moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment mode es a condition of obtaining access to such public improvement, unless: (1) funds received under section 106 of the Act ere used to pay the proportion of such fee or assessment coat relates to the capital costs of such public improvement that are financed from revenue sources of her then under Title 1 the Act; or (2) for purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned end occupied by persons of low and mndero lc income who are not persons of low income, the grantee certifies to the Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received under section 106 of the Act to comply with the requirements o[ subperogteph (11; end (j) It will comply with the other provisions of the Act end with other applicable laws. - 2 - £t~wanc~a area ~bra~nage ~'larz ancL development' 2~olicies CirJ o`f `~nnc(o Cucarnonr~a, Cafi forn i~ TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I INTROOOCT[ON SECTION II GENERRL DRAINAGE PLAN AND POLICIES ANALYSIS SECTION III AREA PLANS AND POLICIES AREA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3 AREA 4 AREAS 5 & 7 AREA 6 AREA 8 SECTION IV IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION V ALTERNATIVE DRAINAGE POLICIES PAGE 1 4 8 8 10 12 14 16 21 23 24 25 i SECIIgI I INTRODUCTION On November 1, 1984, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga recognizing critical concern with drainage within the Etiwanda Specific Plan Area established a moratorium on additional development within the area to allow the preparation of a Master Plan of Drainage and Development Policies. This report represents the first product of efforts to develop the Plan. IC is anticipated that the policies proposed in this document would be presented to Council on March 20, 1985 for final adoption. BACKGROUND The Etiwanda Area encompasses over 3000 acres of land centered on the historic community of Etiwanda. Etiwanda developed out of the citrus industry and was built up around the local railroad station. The Community is bordered on the east by The Devore Freeway, on the west by the Victoria Planned Community and on the north by the San Gabriel Mountains and several thousand acres of County Territory included in the Foothills Community Plan. The Etiwanda Area drains gently to the southeast into Etiwanda Creek. Etiwanda Creek is a natural drainage course with only minor improvements north of Foothill Blvd. The reach under the Devore Freeway is concrete lined, and the reach between the freeway and Foothill Blvd. is an earth channel with rail and wire revetment. The creek above The Devore Freeway is an earth excavated channel with minimum flood flow capacity and major debris potential. This reach is subject to serious erosion and debris movement caused by flows generated from the mountains and Foothills Area. In the past, flows have broken out of the channel on numerous occasions. This stretch of channel represents a major potential flood hazard. Etiwanda Creek below Foothill Blvd. exists as a natural drainage course extending to Airport Drive in Ontario. The creek has no capacity for flood flows through this reach and additional development without adequate mitigation would present a hazard. There are tf~ree existing drainage retention facilities on Etiwanda Creek. The Etiwanda Spreading Grounds above and below 24th Street, the Victoria Basin between Highland Avenue and The Devore Freeway and the Etiwanda Conservation Basins located at Etiwanda Avenue and Fourth Street. These basins represent primary resource in mitigating increased flow from bath the Etiwanda Area and the County Foothills Area. -1- The mast northeasterly portions of the Etiwanda Area and the Foothills drain to the San Sevaine Basins out letting to the San Sevaine Channel. The magnitude of the San Sevaine Basin is such that flow generated tributary to it can be mitigated through development of the basin. For policy purposes of the current study, ignores those areas tributary to the San Sevaine Basins. The areas westerly of the Etiwanda Area are included in the Victoria ' Drainage System which is tributary to the Day Creek System. Because there are no significant issues related to the Day Creek System, this area has been excluded for study. The primary focus for analysis are those areas tributary to Etiwanda 1 Creek. In studying The Etiwanda Specific Plan Area, we have assumed that all flows from the foothills will be captured by an interceptor drain northerly of '- 24th Street and routed through the Etiwanda Spreading grounds where additional __ debris and flows would be attenuated to protect from adverse downstream impacts. PROPOSED REGIONAL FL000 CONTROL FACILITIES A regional flood control plan has been prepared and accepted by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. This plan known as the Day, Etiwanda and San Sevaine Creeks System Drainage Plan proposes the diversion of upper Etiwanda Creek at Foothill Blvd. into San Sevaine Creek. Etiwanda Creek , south of Foothill Blvd, would become a local drain to Airport Drive where flows are directed to lower Etiwanda Creek Channel currently under design by the City of Ontario. Lower Etiwanda Creek empties into the Nineville Basin on ' the Day Creek System. Day Creek Channel recently received property owner approval to fund construction through a combination of a Mello-Roos Tax and Redevelopment Tax , Increment. This Channei will enter the design phase in the month of April with construction to begin by April of 1986. It is generally accepted that the Etiwanda Creek is inadequate to accept , the increased runoff created by further development. No diversion of flows into San Sevaine Channel will be allowed until the down stream channel has , been constructed to a level acceptable to the County Flood Control District. LOCAL ORA WAGE There exists no local drainage systems in the Etiwanda Area. Flows generated by existing development are currently dispersed over natural terrain in a sheet flow condition or collect in natural channels and along the , existing streets. _2_ ' 1 1 Of the streets in the Etiwanda, only Etiwanda Avenue has any significant water carrying capacity. This capacity is provided by the existing rubble curbing Which is in need of repair at several locations. The remaining streets such as East Avenue, Victoria Street, Summit Avenue and Miller Avenue are all narrow unimproved streets with minimal water carrying capacity. 1 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT Given the general lack of both regional and local drainage systems in the Etiwanda Area, it can 6e anticipated that unconstrained development would result in massive damage to public streets and potential flood hazards to life and property throughout the Area. -3- M SECTION II , GENERAL DRAINAGE PLAN AND POLICIES ANALYSIS ' For purposes of analysis and policy development, the study area has been broken into eight unique subareas. Each of these areas are analyzed in detail , in SECTION III. These areas fall into two distinct categories: first, those areas tributary to the Victoria Basin and second, those which drain to Etiwanda Creek directly. The second category significantly impacts East Avenue. Those areas tributary to Victoria Basin can mitigate regional impacts through use of the basin for flow detention. The major problem for drainage in this area is the provisan of storm drain facilities to deliver flows to the basin. Any significant development in the area requires construction of the Route 30 interceptor drain and southerly connection to the Victoria Basin. If ' proximity to the basin is such that extensive improvements are infeasible, the development should be considered premature and should await a natural extension of the drainage system. ' Those areas tributary directly to Etiwanda Creek via East Avenue are Beverly strained 6y a lack of both regional and local drainage systems. Two , options have been identified to mitigate increased flows due to development of these areas. Both options require significant early capital commitments. In addition to the drainage improvements required to facilitate , development, each site will be required to construct adequate flood protection measures in conformance with the City's Flood Protection Code. 1 -4- ' 1 LC~WCl1h~CL .7{I"QCL`bl"c7lll~iCJC`p~rllL EcrwmdaSyrwrlrny~Crrounds San St.xiuw I - SP'Y"d°'9 CjlnmAs 'Aty Crcck I' 5'°""'is~ I L'~ ~ i per 111 A<z Day CrcekBaun 1~------ spay Crc<(c Channel-- ~, >~rhm >n~a ~Ar,anv 9ioua s-- 2kwrc Fn<way --~ $ounc~ary a Ct~md ~... SynaAuuJ JCranou(s ~... Channel or Cn<k ~i ~ ... `Rxrnday Aria. wig CI b~aona. Basin rr .~ 1 I ~' QII.'I -5- ~riwanc~a..,4rea~ra%rta~e pan Q ~ I y ~~ ~ .c ~ 2-.s ~ FF t-i ~ E;, ~ ~ r ~-: 2-4 v 2-! Thyhland ~1vc h_7 w 5-5 5_2 Viccorui. V~aoria Srrur Bnsui s-~ R R `Bax L'nc Rani •5-a 5-/ ~ ~_7 7-2 Sjl Ttwrc Frca.:iy 7-/ ~ ®O 1-l. i £wrhill bwd 0 Q ft~Jtnd ... 2lvpaudDrauu .Channel arCrr~k `Propose. ..~V faster ~lar1 `bra~na~e -6- ... 7VropastA'Auuu ... 'EtounAnn, .Arra nu ~-z Int z-, ;no.oa+ ;.~,,~ 1 4 inC 2-2 ; Wo,oOo ,~ rea. Jnt 2-~ ;105.600 ~raina e 2~~an. W!C"EltlnlnttJ c~ _7_ ~r~wanc~t. a4rea~rairta~e pan SECTION III ARER PLANS AND POLICIES AREA 1 E)<ISTING CONDITIONS Area 1 drains the area north of Highland Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue. The area i5 divided into numerous parcels varying in size from 5 to 20 acres. The general drainage pattern is to Etiwanda Avenue concentrating at the intersection of Highland and Etiwanda Avenues. Etiwanda Avenue is 40 feet wide, the pavement is in poor condition. Curbs along the street are shallow rubble curDS in a poor state of repair. Provisions for drainage at the intersection of Etiwanda and Highland include small catch basins and cross drains. The intersection currently receives periodic flooding. Etiwanda Avenue extending southerly of Highland contains limited water carrying capacity with no outlet until it meets Etiwanda Channel in Ontario. PROPOSED MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE The Area 1 Master Plan includes a ma,ior interceptor drain along the north boundary of Route 30 (Drain 2-1 ). This drain collects flaws from the north and routes them east and south into the Victoria Basins. An additional drain will be required ir. Etiwanda Avenue to convey flows in excess of street capacity (Drain 1-2) RECOMMENDED DRAINAGE POLICIES This area is the most remote area tributary to the Victoria Basins. Etiwanda Avenue has limited capacity to accept additional drainage. The area should not develop until adequate interim or permanent connection can De made to the Route 30 Drain (2-1) and potential flooding and damage on Etiwanda Avenue is mitigated through construction of segments of Drain 1-2. Prior to comp let ton of Drain 2-I, ft may be possible to convey drainage easterly in the proposed freeway right-of-way making use of interim channels and levees. This option is subJect to any property owner easements and/or requirements of CalTrans' permits. Due to the total deficiency of drainage facilities serving this area, development not already submitted should not be allowed the use of interim retention facilities except as fntegrated into a channel on the freeway right- of-way. Development will be required to participate in needed expansfon of the Victoria Basin and the required inlet and outlet facilities. -8- rbra~na~e plan. .~4rea 2 .,~~o~ ~:rat io~r'Esnmm~s (mc : -, :856.+00 (nic 2': f Joo~aa UIt 2'3 j1U5,6M J lcdmd ~ . . , Channel arCrcck ti Ill . .. ~lopaua 2h-auu ` Lbundan~ fi,m. r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~r~wanc~Ct..~4rea~rauta9e ~~art. AREA 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Area 2 drains the area northerly of Highland Avenue extending to 24th - Street between Etiwanda and East Avenues and to Summit Avenue easterly of East Avenue. The area drains generally in the southeasterly direction to the Victoria Basin. The area northerly of Summit Avenue currently drains to Summit Avenue then easterly where it proceeds southerly in several undefined natural watercourses. Highland Avenue currently contains a low capacity earthen ditch on the south side which collects and deposits flows into undefined watercourses directed towards Victoria Basin. East Avenue pavements are in poor condition and the street has no curbs and neglible water carrying capacity. East Avenue requires realignment at Summit Avenue. Summit Avenue is a narrow two-lane road with mounding and earthen channel _- along the south shoulder. Water carrying capacity of the street is minimal and future development would create serious flooding and damage along Summit. Several development proposals have been submitted in the area between East and Etiwanda Avenues from Highland to Summit. The City has budgeted funds to reconstruct East Avenue in Cooperation with developers. - PROPOSED MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE Area 2 drains to the Route 30 interceptor drain (2-1) and thence _ southerly into the Victoria Basin. Grains will also be required on Summit Avenue (2-3) and East Avenue (2-2) to convey flaws in excess of street capacity. RECOMMENDED DRAINAGE POLICY No additional development should be allowed without completion of the Route 30 interceptor drain (2-1) easterly of East Avenue to Victoria Basin and construction of the East Avenue (2-2) storm drains. Interim drainage facilities may be constructed in the Route 30 Freeway right- of-way draining to Victoria Basin. These interim facilities would be subject to approval of CalTrans. A11 development will be required to excavate port tons of Victoria Basin and contribute to necessary inlet and outlet facilities. Interim facilities shall not be creditable to any applicable drainage fees. -10- ~riwanc~a..~rea~ra%rta~e p(cin uwny ~braina~e pCan ~,~~,~,,,,~~„ Lnc J-1 iMr,ooo ~4rea 3 _, 1_ ...'Av~wsedDrauu ... 24opoudDrauu AREA 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS i,rea 3 lies north of the extension of Summit Avenue between East Avenue and Etiwanda Creek. The area drains in a basically sheet flow condition towards the southeast. The Etiwanda Specific Plan shows Summit Avenue being extended in the future to easterly of Etiwanda Creek. Any development would increase and concentrate flows to the south. These actions require adequate easements for drainage. PROPOSED MASTER PLAN This area wail be served by storm drain in Summit Avenue (Drain 3-1). RECOMMENDED DRAINAGE POLICY Any development should provide adequate flowage easements to direct flows to the Summit Avenue Storm Drain 3-1 and construct adequate foci lines to divert flows along the alignment of Drain 3-1 into Etiwanda Creek. The development shall be required to pay fees or construct portions of the channel. Disposition of flows into Etiwanda Creek will require Flood Control District approval and provision of detention at the point of discharge or in the Etiwanda Spreading grounds. Where development constructs portions of Summit Avenue, the storm drain shall be installed. Area 3 is su6~ect to severe flood hazards due to breakout of flows from Etiwanda Creek and the Etiwanda Spreading grounds. Any development wall require extensive flood protection measures to 6e designed by the developer's engineer untfl such time as the upstream debris dam and channel have been constructed. -12- ~riwanc~a..~rea'llra~na9e pan Gunnar Svc Y ~ `> 5 ~ QM: M ~ ~+ ~a 0 w m 711ghland Atx 1 U ltl[COft0. O BASUt J y., 9?cwrc Fruwuy tilC(UI"4t S[IPCC , Sa,r(on Pac ~ R'R ~ ! `Bose Lac Raul ~, !-/ { Is9cncl Channel ar Cnck i-! . , . 4lvposcA'A~auts ~, .. Bvlo,Aan~.Arw. ~raina~e ~~an 14 rea ~ 1 l.3- AREA 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS Area 4 lies westerly of Etiwanda Avenue northerly of Base Line Road. The area drains south easterly to Etiwanda Avenue and thence south on Etiwanda Avenue until flaws find their way into Etiwanda Creek between Foothill 81vd. and Fourth St. Etiwanda Avenue pavement conditions are poor and the rubble curbing is in a poor state of repair. Flows have traditfanaliy been retained in the street in this area without significant damage. PROPOSED MRSTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE This area is planned to drain to Etiwanda Avenue with the provision of cross culvert at Base Line Road and a portion of drain in Etiwanda Avenue (4- 1) directing flows into The Oevore Freeway Interceptor Drain (5-1) or to drain 7-1 depending on options presented in Area 5 and 7 policies. RECOM~IENDEO DRAINAGE POLICIES Development in this area will be required to improve curb sections on Etiwanda Avenue to insure the water carrying capacity of the street and to pay fees to contribute to future Master Plan Storm Orain construction of Orain 5-1 or 7-1. -14- ~tiwanc~a .~rea'~rauta9e pan Summi'r r1t+c ~ r--/BO® v ~ ~ w ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 31,yhln„d A~ D1/!rs a / ~~ - / 5-s 5 Vurorin Vurarut Srrrcr !' 'Hasa, /8~.~ ~ 5-P $au(icnt P~ ~ O .~ ~ i-4 Bnsc Lnc ~ 'R~ ~cncC i-.Y Q...`$wmdMJ:41Yn. 4-/ `e .i-/;1 A~ e ~Dcwrc Fruway /V ~-/ ~, Nroyoscd2Lnuu .- , . UynorutlDrmns lUSr "f5fir,iart5 ~bY'alna~e pCan Iul< 5-1 31,954 M0 int 5-r f Zt2o~ ~4,rea, 5 jinc s-s f zs~.ena hnc s-• f z~o.ma Tine 5-s ~ ais.aao -7 5- AREAS SAND7 EXISTING CONDITIONS Areas 5 and 7 include those lands lying between Foothill Blvd. and Highland Avenue which generally drain to Etiwanda Creek via East Avenue. Flows currently collect in East Avenue and are deposited into Etiwanda Creek at Foothill Blvd. Area 5 lies northerly of the Devore Freeway and Area 7 southerly. East Avenue northerly of Base Line Road is a narrow 30-foot paved section with no curbing. Graded shoulders are eroded in heavy storms and pavement undermining is common. Unconstrained development would increase this erosion potential in magnitude and frequency. At Base Line Road flows are picked up in a drainage system constructed with The Devore Freeway. This system conveys flows to a box culvert under The Devore Freeway to an outlet onto East Avenue. East Avenue south of Base Line Road has been widened to 40 feet and a berm constructed on the west side to enhance water carrying capacity. Increased flows would likely exceed the street capacity. Areas southerly of Base Line and north of The Devore Freeway drain into collector drains constructed with the freeway and are discharged through three cross culverts to natural collection points southerly of the freeway. These culverts then drain overland to Miller Avenue where general ponding occurs until further diversion to East Avenue easterly or southeasterly occurs. DRAINAGE OPTIONS Two alternative drainage plans hava been explored to handle these areas: Option 1 would continue the historic pattern of draining all lands to East Avenue for eventual deposition into Etiwanda Creek. Until the appropriate downstream channel facilities are constructed, increased flows would have to be att ennuated in a detention basin located in the vicinity of the intersection of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. This detention facility would outlet into Etiwanda Creek until San Sevaine Channel was improved to accept these flows. When no longer needed, the basin could be reclaimed and sold. Option 2 would construct a drain along The Devore Freeway from Base line Road to a connection point with an existing freeway drain some 600 feet south of Miller Avenue. Flows would then be diverted to Day Creek Channel which will be constructed within the next three years. Under this option the diversion of Area 5 flows to Day Creek would mitigate the impact of increased flows caused by the deveiopment of Area 7. Area 7 would then drain ,•to the existing Etiwanda Creek with no further mitigation. -16- r ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS: , Under Option 1 before any development was allowed to proceed, lands for the construction of the detention basin would have to be secured and an ' initial excavation and inlet and outlet systems constructed. The estimated initial cost of this construction including a 10-acre land acquisition would be 8600,000 to 8800,OG0. Under Option 2 the Interim Victoria Planned Community retention basin ' would have to be modified to attenuate Victoria flows to free capacity in The Oevore Ereeway drain. That drain would then be extended northerly an adequate distance to divert flows away from Etiwanda Creek to Day Creek. The goal , would 6e to effect sufficient diversion to compensate for the impact of increased flows on East Avenue due to development. The minimal cost of this construction involving extension of The Devore Freeway Orain to the second , cross culvert north of Miller Avenue would be approximately 8400,000. Option 1 could be significantly reduced if the 10-acre site could be attained at lower no cost. This could be accomplished through easements in the flood plane or through combination with future park acquisition and _ development. Initial basin development could be accomplished far less than 8100,000 once land had been acquired. Option 1 has the further advantage of , freeing those portions of Area 5 north of Base Line with a lower initial investment. Option 2 has the advantage of a lower initial cost assuming land is not 1 readily available for the detention basin. An additional benefit of Option 2 is that the permanent diversion to Day ' Creek would reduce the Etiwanda Creek impact immediately and for the long term. The Devore Ereeway drain further opens the possibility of a connection ' to Victoria Basin which could possibly affect dramatic savings on the eventual than nel ization of Etiwanda and San Sevaine Channels. Option 2 provides better drainage for the area south of Base Line Road than does Option 1. A final advantage of Option 2 is that it would avoid an unsightly basin in the vicinity of Foothill Blvd. and the ongoing maintenance liability. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION , Staff generally favors Option 2 but feels that the benefits of Option 1 , given an ability to obtain cheap land are sufficient to retain both Options until further assessments of land availability can be made. This can best 6e accomplished with the assistance of development interests in the two areas. AREA 5 DEVELOPMENT POLICIES , East Avenue north of Base Line Road has no capacity to accept inceased , runoff. Prior to development of any of this area, the East Avenue Drain 5-2 will have to be constructed or the street improved its entire length to accept the additional water. 17 , ~riwancja, .~4rea,`~ra~nage p(an D -,:~ .~-, ~,. '-~ ~ ;~ .~ ~ ~Ylil(n-Id ~ ,,yyo $4 O ~~N' ~1IQYS CaCC No IS ~-1~1 i-l 5-Ih a ~~~hat oO a~a ~ ~~ h`° -~ ;, <~ ~ ~C vv .gnvW T1R1K ~ V J ~C Ar `/ V ~' Sawn ~ R'R v Lrg~nd ~ ~• • • Channel arGak ~.,. ~braina~e Can Cafr'bnmaas 1 i 1 1 1 _, Victoria Street is a flat narrow (36-foot) street with limited water carrying capacity. Further development north of Victoria will have to assess drainage impacts on Victoria and ff required install needed portion of the Victoria Storm Drain Line 5-5. Areas tributary to Storm Drain 5-3 and 5-4 will be required to construct needed segments of these lines to prevent any unusual problems caused by development. Where drain construction is not required fees should be paid to assist in final construction. Option 1 Policies No development of Area 5 would be allowed until adequate detention facilities have been constructed to County Standards. Option 2 Policies Development could only proceed to the extent that flows can be diverted to the Devore Freeway drain and the Victoria P.C. Interim basin modifications have been completed. This program would iodate cost sharing alternatives or farce development to occur in a south to north orientation fallowing construction of The Devore Freeway Drain Line 5-I. AREA 7 DEVELOPMENT POLICIES No development of this area can proceed until the basin in Option 1 has been constructed to County Standards or adequate drainage diversions to Day Creek under Option 2 have been effected. All development will be required to contribute towards the construction of the Foothill 81vd. (7-1) and East Avenue (7-2) Storm Drains. -19- ~y aA~ Clmnntl arCmk ~... `Boim~an, Arrt ~braina~e ~~an Casr'Esnninus 24rea, 6 ,,~u b.. ,z.>~.~ _20_ ~riwanc~a..~rea.`~ra~na9e p(an AREA 6 EXISTING CONDITIONS Area 6 lies northerly of the Victoria Basin to Highland Avenue between East Avenue and Etiwanda Creek. The area drains in a southeasterly direction into the Victoria Basin. PROPOSED MASTER PLAN The area is served by Storm Dratn 6-1 which drains to the Victoria Basin. RECOMMENDED DRAINAGE POLICIES Development in the area will be required to obtain easements for adequate drainage along the alignment of Storm Drain 6-1 to deposition of flows into the Victoria Basin. Construct or contribute to the construction of Storm Drain 6-1. Excavate portions of the Victoria Basin and contribute to necessary inlet and outlet structure to the Basin. -21- ~riwanc~a .~4rea Pivd ~ ~v, .Arrow Roucc ~(WtC "f'ntwny $nncn & R R na9e pCan ~~ s R-/ i 'bad Cru(c Cfinnruf .0 ~~ aD ''~ c v ;3 ,~ I /~ ~~n~ ~ e g. `)~xmdnn~.Arrn. ~. , Noyoscd'Uauu ~,.Chnnncl orCr,!ck ~braina~e pCan ~4rea $ _. ,_ AREA 8 - E%I STING CONDITIONS Area 8 is the area southerly of Foothill Blvd. tributary to Etiwanda Creek. Existing drainage is generally south into a natural watercourse. This watercourse is currently subject to periodic flooding in major storm events. Upon implementation of the Day-Etiwanda-San Sevaine System, Etiwanda Creek will he joined to the San Sevaine Channel at Foothill Blvd. and divert _ flows which currently traverse this natural channel will 6e diverted. When this diversion is effected, the existing channel with minor improvements would accommodate the remaining local drainage. Currently existing at the Fourth Street crossing of Etiwanda Creek are - the Etiwanda Conservation Basins. Although these basins are under easements with the Southern California Edison Company with a 90-day termination clause, they do provide a resource to mitigate increased frequency of flow due to development. They also Drovide opportunities for water conservation. _ PROPOSED MASTER PLAN Area 8 will utilize the existing natural Etiwanda Creek with construction of local feeder drains in Arrow Route (Line 8-1) and along the Santa Fe - Railroad (Line 8-2). The section cf channel between Arrow Route and the Santa Fe Railroad will he formalized with spetif is easements and protection provided to abutting properties through the construction of rock slope protection along the channel banks. Minor crossing improvements and collector drain will 6e constructed at ' the crossing with Whittr am Avenue. RECOMMENDED DRAINAGE POLICIES ' If Option 2 for the Areas 5 & 7 is implemented, land shall 6e allowed to drain freely into Etiwanda Avenue and Etiwanda Creek as long as adequate protection is provided to adjacent properties. If Option 1 for the Areas 5 & ' 1 is chosen before any development is allowed to proceed, the required detention basin would have to be secured as required for those areas. Where necessary, developments may be required to construct local feeder drain lines ' 8-1 and 8-2 or to improve segments of the Etiwanda Creek to meet Master Plan requiements. All properties with adequate disposal opportunities will contribute fees toward the implementation of the Master Plan facilities. -23- SECTION IY IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS The Etiwanda Area is predominately undeveloped and, therefore, presents opporutnities for funding which are not readily available in other areas of the City. To take advantage of those opportunities, the area should be segregated from the Citywide fee program and individual fee districts establshed. This program would enhance reimbursement arrangemenets and provide incentives for assessments and other joint financing opportunities. Fee districts shall correspond to the basic facilities divison. One district would include those areas tributary to Victoria Basin (Area 1, 2, 3, 6) and the other district areas tributary directly to Etiwanda Creek (Areas 4, 5, 7, 8). To accelerate funding of needed facilities, drainage fees collected as a condition of subdivisions should be paid at the time of map recordation rather than at time of building permit issuance. This action would generate facility funds ahead of the needs created by the actual development. In the absence of viable assessment opportunities or joint projects, it is unlikely that development will be able to occur in the upper watersheds until facilities are in place. Development under these conditions will be forced by economic constraints to proceed along master plan facilities from their outlet northerly. All fees shall include an increment towards final completion of the regional system. CUSTOM LOT SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT One issue which should be discussed is the status of existing lot single family home construction. It is recommended to exempt this type of development from the policy provision and to allow fee payments only. This policy would generate certain cash flows into drainage funds with minimal impact. -24- SECTION Y ALTERNATIVE DRAINAGE POLICIES In the analysis of alternatives to the proposed drainage policies, two options were reviewed: o Extensive use of interim retention facilities o Unconstrained development Unconstrained development will result in significant public expenses due to damages Great od by frequent flooding conditions. Extensive use of detention facilities is not feasible because of ongoing maintenance liabilities and the need for basins to outlet onto existing streets. The ultimate effect of retention basins are to reduce and prolong flows. If they are not carefully designed, they can produce increased flows over a long period of time causing extended damage to public facilities. Under Subareas 1 and 2, the option for interim retention within the Route 30 Freeway drain seems viable if the appropriate approvals can be attained. No other option would be recommended beyond any currently in the approval stages. -25- ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2 PREPARED BY DON 0~4'EN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2061 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE SUITE 206 IRVINE CALIFORNIA 92715 (714) 752-9082 FEBRUARY 1985 RAtJCHO CUCAMONGA AC 84-2 PAGE 1 AGENCY: CITY O-r FANCkO CUCAM~~P:GA PRO,IE CT: A55ESSMErJT DISiRIC.T 84-2 - fAI TA L:1MA CHANNEL IMFROVEMENTS) TO: CITY COUNCIL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE r'FOVISIONS OF SECTION L(1?04 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHUiAYS CODE Pursuant to <he prOViFions of the "MUnic~pal improvement Acr of 1R 73," being Division 12 of the S~reetg and Highways Code of the State of Cailfornia, and In accordance with the Resolution of Intention, being Resolution No. 85-19, adopted by the City Council of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCA6(ONGA (hereinafter referred to ae the "City"1, In connection with the proceedings for ASS F.S SMENT DISTRICT 84-2 -(ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (herelnef ter referred to as the "Assessment District"), I, eubmlt herewith the Report for the Ae seeament District, consisting of five (5) parts as follows: PART I Plans and specifications fer the proposed improvements ere flletl herewith and made a part hereof. Said plans and epecifrcations are on file in the Office of the City En9lneer. PART II An estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements, Including incidental costs and eepensas in connection - therewith, Is sat forth on the lists theronf, attached hereto, and are on the in the Office of the City Engineer. PART III A propo^•ed as.ac:nm~~t of the total amount of the costs and oxpnn;es of th.~ ~•r~„~,ed im~rnv.•n'.e n',~ upon the .~..voral subdlvlF~ens of I'~•~I within the A.s easement District, ~n prepn't~on rn ton e~;t in•.ted benrfta to be reco~ved by Surh suhdlvl., o~~~, from Faid in•prov wo,•n t=, in rot forth upon •he RANCHO CDf_AMONGA AD 94-7 PAGE 2 assessment roll filed herewith end made a part hereof. PART IV A diagram showing rho Ass~ssmnnt f~~~tr,n', the boundaries and the dimensions of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District, as the same existed a* the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention is filed herewitn and made a part hereof, and part of the assessment. PART V Description of the work for the proposed imprevemen+s and des<rio'ion of all rrghta-of-way, easements and lands to he acquired, if necessary, is sot forth in the assessment and report, and made a part hereof. PART I Plans and specifications for the proposed improvements are filed herewith and made a part thereof. Sa1d plans and specifications are on file in the Office of the City Engineer. PART II Pro)ect coat have been estimated on the entire Frolect end contributions from the city and the county are subtrar.ted from total projer.t cost to determine the portion M be assessed under the assessment proceeding. The cost estimates as preliminarly approved are shown in the first part of the following table. Cost estimates as confirmed are to be presented in second part of the table, City and county funds ere from appropriate flood control funds dedicated to and contributed for the completion of the project as shown in Exhibit A & 8 and summarized below. AS PRELIMI- AS NARILY APPROVED CONFIRMED EstimateA Cost of Construction: f f Estimated Incidental Costs and Expenses f f_______ F.etimated Tntpl Cost: f Y Estimated Contra bu!ion: f f RANCHO CUrAMgNGA AD 84.2 Par,E ? Balance to Assessment: S S ___________ ___________ PART III ASSESSMENT ROLL MUNINCIPAL IMPRDVFR'~E NT ACT OF 1313, DIVISION 12 OF TaE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFGRNI<.. WHEREAS. nn the 6 day of February, 1985, the City C.n un<il ni the City of Rancho Cucamonga, f..alifo~nia !hereinafter referrptl to as "Agency"), tlitl, pursuant to tha provedons ns the "Mun rncip?i :mprovpmen! Act of 1<++°~," he,n.. Division 12 of the Strep :s and Highways Code of the Eta+< ^i California, ar.d ae amended, adopt its Resolution ei ~nten*~nn No. 66-33, +nr the construction of certain puhlit improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in corn a<tion therewith, in a special assessmenht district known and designated as - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 84-2 !AL TA LAMA CHANNEL IMPRnvFMF NTS) !hereinafter referred tc ae the "Assessment District"); and WHEREAS, said Resoluf ion of Intention, as required by law, did direct the appointed Superintendent of Streets to make and file a "Report," consisting of the following: a. Plana; b. Specifications; c. Cost estimate; d. Assessment Diagram showing the Assessment - District and the subdivision of land contained therein; - e. A proposed assessment of the costs and __ expenses of the worKS of improvement levied upon the parcels and lots of land within the boundari P.S of the Assessment District. For particulars, reference is matle to the Resolution of Intention as previously adopted. - NtIW, THFFEFpRE, I, LLOYD HUBBS S:oerintendpnt of Streets city of RAW:H4 CUCAMONGA, pursuant to the "Munincrpal - Improvement Act of 1473," do herepy suomit the following: 1. I, pursuant to the pro~'~^.ions of law and the - Resolution of Intention, have ar.s<nned the costd and expenses of tnc worA^, of rmnrnvono nt to Ge performed In the nti:; ,•scment District upon rno p.ir eels of Inns In the .n ,~. ,.; ,mint I±~stri,:t bnne!itod thereby in direct RANCHO ^'IC AMONGA AD 84-2 PA ,E 4 proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of sa,d Darcels. For part~cuiars as to the identification ni sard parcels, reference ~s made to the Assessment Diagram, a ropy of wh,fh is attarhpd hcre~n. 2. As required by iaw, a fi~agram .s hereto attached, showing the Assessment District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective earcpls and subdivisions of land within said District as the same existed at the time of the passage of said Rpsolut~pn of Irate ration, each of which SubdiVisinng n land or Darcels or lots respectively have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in said AF9eSEmpnt Rell• 3. The subdivisions 2nd parcels of land the numbers therp,n ae shown nn the respective Assessmen~ Diagram as attached hereto correspond with ?he numbera as appearing on the Assessment Roll 3s contained herein. 4, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that bonds will be .sewed in acc~rdanre with Division 1D of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California fthe "Improvement Bond Art of 1915"), to represent all unpaid assessments, and the last installment of said bonds shall mature a maximum of rant to exceed fourteen !14) years from tho 2nd day of July next succeeding ten (101 months from their date. Said bonds shall bear Interest at a rate not to exceed the current legal maximum rate of 12% per annum. 5. By virtue of the authority contained in said "Munincipal Imprpvement Ar.t of 1913," and by further direction and order of Agency, I hereby make the fallowing Assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the works of improvement for the Assessment Oistr~ct based on the costs and expenses as set forth below: R. The Method of Spread of Assessment is as set forth in Exhibit "F", which is attached hereto, referenced and so incarporated. In co ncluslon, it is my opinion that the aS9e6smenTg fnf the abOVC-rpfelenred A9SpeSment District have been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the works of Imprevampnt. OAiEp: February 6, t?85. t)y`--------•------------- HANGIO CUCAMONGA AD Ad-' FADE S SUPERINTENDENT OF $iFiF"$ CITY OF RANCHO CUl'Alr~inp3q COUNTY OF SAN RERNARDINii DATED: February F, togs. ~? '''~ ' ___ S :NT E-p--'___ PART IV The assessmen+ diacram for ~s sot forth .n Fvhihi! E. PART V The description of works to he constructed Is as follows; 1. Improvement of the evicting Alta Loma Channel from 1,357• feet north of Hillside (the ?unction of channels 3A and 3h, ee^ Figure d pzgp ??? s^uth +n the existing Alta Loma Basins. This work includes: a. providing concrete lining with fencing to the Channel; b. providing new culvert structures and street imprnvementsat Hillside and Wilson Avenues; t. Constructing a new spillway into the existing Alta Loma Basins located north of Banyan Street 2. Construction of a new debris basin (Basin No. 3I with a spillway and a dam at the north end of the Alta Loma Channel; 3. Provision of new 33" pipes and street improvements to Complete the connection Of Storm drain ?F to the Alta Loma Channel; 4. Modification of the outlet structure from the East Baeln tBas~n No. 2) to the existing Havc r. Avenue Storm Drain. Pr ovislon of a new egualizer and street improvements at Nermosa ,4 venue between the two Alta Lnma Basins. The necessary right of wny and the appropriate right of way certliicate arc set forth ae Evhibit f;. RANf_HO CUCAMONGA AD A4-2 PAGE F 1 , _ _ _ , as CITY CLERK ~~F THE CITY OF RAtJC HO CUC AIn~?":GA, COUNT! OF SAN BERNARD i`4'~, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify that the forago~ng AssD:c-.p nt. rOrJp'hp~ w,th the Diagram attar hnd thprctr, was fled rr my office nn the 6 day of February, i98S. _________________________ CITY CLERK CITY OF RAIJCHO CUCAMONGA I, , as CITY CLERK of the CITY OF RANCHO f.. U^AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, dp hergbv .ar?ifv that the fnregoiny Assessment, tno ether with *herD~.?or a.r~ attached thereto. was aporoved and conf,rmed by t-.e of said Cit on the ____ day of _______________ Y _________________________ CITY CI ERK CITV OF RANCHO Ct!CAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDI Nn I, as SUPERINTENDENT OF _________________________ STREETS of eaiA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram attached thereto, was recorded in my office on the ____ day of ______ _______r 198 SUPERINTENDENT OF STREET.i CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ,ANCHO CUCAMONGA AD B<-2 PAGE 7 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C EXH18tT D EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT F EXHIBIT G EXHIEIT H EXHIBITS Estimate of Cof.t as Preliminary Annrovetl Fstrmate of cost as confirmed Prallmrnary coat estlmatea Assessment roll Assessmen? d'~agram Method of spread Assessrne nt engineers quali~icat .ens Right-oi-way certificate EXHIpIT A J' RANCHl1 CUCAMf'.W iA AD R4-2 EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 EXH181? A ESTIMATE OF ICSTS '~• ~~ AS P PEL Ir.+I NARiL Y APPRpVFD . 'y. `.*~f 4 I. CONSTRUCTION COST ! Based on engineers estimates (see exhibi t G ASSESSMENT TOTAL COST CirY COUNTY DIST 8<-= ^.onslruct~on estimale 52,1D2 ,'??4 f275,~03 f2n7 ,:?7 ft,g"4 7.- 5% Con+ingency (105,149 (?5,027 (10,12^ fC Total censtructinn f2;70R,133 (370,790 3712,F5b~ f1,g24,-R< II. CONSTRUCTION AMdI N ISTRATIDN Administration (50,000 f0 fsD,Dno f0 Survey (115,000 f0 (115,000 fO Snils and testing fR0,000 f0 f60,000 fC Total f225,000 f0 5225,000 SO III. INCIDENTAL EXPE NSF6 FIR (AD R2-2 & AD 84-2) f16,808 f16,80A f0 f0 Design Eng (205,000 5205,000 f0 f0 Assessment Eng f36,000 135,000 f0 f0 9onA Counsel 57,2,421 f22,421 ;0 f0 Financial Conslte f20 ,000 (20,000 f0 SO Registration Coets f15,000 f15,000 f0 SC Bond v n nting antl 55,000 (5,000 f0 fC Servicing BonA Discount 7.5% (129 ,fi3R f25 ,910 f0 Y103,7^F•~ Total f44A,E67 (340,133 f0 E1113,7: `. GRAND to?n!.. t^,873,000 4711'.,y;y 4437,599 (1,720,512 exHi¢ir e w (iA7Y. HU I,UI A'A .i AAA Ai $4-~ TOTAL COST !'ITY f!,3JR,ty0 fR',6f,7 fg6,410 fA6, 2P•R f7.024,fn0 f1P?,955 EXHIBIT 0 ESTIMATE Oc ~'^STS AS CONE ARMED I. UrJS?P!4^TI~^J COST Based on contract bids Constrtrrtion Estimate 5% CentinGanry Total rcns a urt iun II. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AdminisVation (50,000 Survey f115,000 Soils and testing f60, 000 Total f225,000 I11. INCIDENTAL EXPENSES EIR (AD R7-2 h AD 84-21 Design Eng Assessment Eng Bond Council Financial Cnnsl<s Registration Costs Bond Printing and Servicing Bond Discount 7.5% Total fiRAAD TOTAL F.XHIOIt 0 F,~ql' ~ .49CCCsv=N? COUNTY DIST 84-' 370<'.,4?7 F1,P4C .:I:.6 310. '~. 30 3217~«q 31, F,.4^ ~i.4F f0 f50,OOU f0 f0 4115,000 f0 ;0 fF0,0OO SO so sz2s,ona sn f16,808 f16, 808 fn fO s2os,ono s2os,eoD sn sD f36,000 f3fi,000 f0 fn f22,421 f22,421 f0 f0 s2n,DOO szo,ooo sD sn sls,ooo sls,oon sn so 45,000 f5, 000 f0 f0 fA6,42R f0 f406,655 f320,229 42,656,255 f480, 184 f0 (66,426 t0 f103, 77.0 f437,55g 41,728,512 Exi~ieir c RANT,HQ CUCAMgNGA AD 84-2 FY,HIPIT ~^. PA ,F t F KHIPIY "C" SCHEDULE 0= Uf;~T CO57 At:7 LU!d-" SUM11 A!.1C L'NTs PRELIMINARY CrINTRACT ITE!dS Opcrr:pr,nn (Unit Eatlmated Item No. Pricy rn Words) Clua ntity Unit P rice Totol t, Cloarinn and Grunhing L.R. L.S. S90.Dr'0 2. Traffic Control L.S. L.S. x15 ,!':'~0 3. DPVeIpD Wctor SUDPIY L.F. L.S. A1f`, (In.. 4. F!ni~hing Roadway L.S. L.S. f7.Onn 5. Foadway Excavation, 7600 C.Y. s7 .00 f5'., 2(:0 Hillside Road, Wilson Avenue and Hermosa Avenve 6. Englargoment of Alta 5000 C.Y. (3 .50 f17 ,:,00 Loma bas .,s No. ~ and No. 2 7. Excavatinn of Alta 35000 C.Y. f3. 50 st°2,500 Loma Saein No. 3 B. Ditch Excavation 23000 C.Y. f7. 50 f177_,500 ?. Class 2 Aggregate Base 1000 C.Y. f24. U0 (24,000 10. Asphalt Concrete 2100 tons (35. 00 f73,500 11. Plate Asphalt Concrete 600 S.Y. (7. 50 f4,500 (Misc. Areas) 12. Place Asphalt Concrete 400 L.F. f2. 50 (1,000 Dike 13. Asphalt Emulsion 2 tons (500. 00 (1,000 (Paint Olnder> 14. Driveway and Driveway 500 $.Y. 522. 00 f11,000 ApprDatn 15. Concrete Sidewalk 500 S.Y. f22. 00 611,000 (6' wide) 16. Curb and Gutf or 2200 L.F. (10. 00 f^~,nCO 17. i6" Splash Curb f$,6pq 1R. Concrete for 2500 C.Y. f110. On s275.040 Trepezoldal Channel 1?. Rointnrc..+Ment St?el 147000 Lbs IF> f0. d5 ifR,150 for Trapezoidal ('hen nf;l 20. Concrotr inr 520 C.Y. f217. 00 f112,A40 Rectangular Channel 21. Reinforcement Stp.~l 1D3onD Lbe (Fl f0. 45 f46,35G ter Rectanqul nr fh2nnel 27.. Concrete for 250 C.Y. IF) (276. 00 fF.R,i`•I1 T rineu lions 23. Re,nfor r.nment 5tecl 'I c,000 Lbs (F) (0. 60 f21,Ntn for Tiansit~ons RANf.Hp f, IJ CAA!r)~YiP. 40 Q4-2 F.XH I R I T ~' PAt3~:. 2 Dessript~r,n !Unit Est lmated Item No. Price In Words) Caant rty Unlt Price Total c4. Concrete for t0'x Z' fin C.v. (F) (320. Oil F~; tili, Bor Culvert , 25. R.+i rr`nrcam.+nt 9rngl .^4000 lbs (F) (0.40 fo ~an0 for iG'x 8' Oox Culver t . 26. Cnnu ete fnr 1,'_'x ?' 140 C.Y.(F) f300.On fd2 00C~ Box Culvert , 27. Relnforcem~nt Steei 45000 Lbs (F) (0.40 f7P 000 fOr 12'x ?' BON rUlVPr t . ' 28. Concrete for Double ' 455 C.Y. (F) (250,00 K17,Iy 7Sl~ 8 z 6' Ro. Gil vert , 29. Re,nforcem~nt Steel 30000 Lbs (F) f0.4n Safi Op;. fnr Dnubla 8'x 6' Box , Culvert 90. Con r.~ete fnr Alta 560 C.Y. (F) f20U.On a•t2 i,On Loma RaS,n 'Jp. 3 Spillway 31. Reinforcement Steel 7N000 Lbs (F) f0.4S '00 (35 for Alta Loma Oas~n , No. 3 Spillway 32. Concrete for Spillway 1R0 C.Y. fF) (7.20.00 f39 E00 Sta. 3a62 to Sta. 4.42 , 33. Reinforcement Steel 7000 Lbs fF) (0.45 f3 150 for Spillway Sta. 3.62 , tp Sta. 4+42 34. Modify Haven Storm L.S. f5,000.00 (5 000 Drain Inlet , 35. Rock, Light Clase, for 1900 C.Y. 521.00 f3? 500 Cpncreted-rock Slope , Protection 36. Mlnpr ContrPte for 760 C,Y. f50.00 538 000 ConcreteA-rock Slope , Protection 37. Rock, 1-ton Class, for 700 C.Y. (25.00 Rock Slone Protection 3B, 48" RCP (1350-0) 64 L F f77,500 39. .38" RCP (1500-D) , . 24 L F f85.00 (5,440 40. 36" RCP f135G-D) . . 7A L F f67.00 ft,f,OB 41. 38" RCP (7350-0) . . 306 L F ff,5.00 f5,070 C.nncrete encnced . . f105.00 f32, 730 42. ?3" RCP (t950-O) 57E L.F. f67.00 7a f35 6 A3. 33" RCP (1350-D) " 72 L.F. f6D.Dn , s4 ~:'0 44, 46 30 Rfr (7500-D7 " 86 L.F. (59.00 , SS,074 • 8D RCP (730-p ) " 34 L.F. f58.00 11 37? 4f. 24 RCP (1500-D) P.0 L.F. f45.00 , 0n0 13 07. 24" RCP (135 ~-D) 128 L.F. f43.00 , (5 504 49. Manhole "A" 3 Ea. (1,900.00 , f5 70fi 4`?• Catch F?assn NJ 1 8 Ga. (3,200.00 , t19 2nn 60. Catch B:r;,,n Nn. .. ° 1 F.a. 13,700.00 , 7np f3 51. to vcr S.,n,tary 7r L.F. sro Do , Sewer, Hermosa Avenue . 52. Snnitnry S,•wnr A{anholp, 1 C.i. f3,000.00 (4,3;0 Ile rro„r;n Avenue in,nOn RANCHiJ fI1CARiUNGA AD 8a-2 EX.H InIT !' ^4GE 3 Des<r~ption (bolt Eetlmdt•'d Item No. Prife in Worde> OUantity Unit Pr ice Total 53• Alta Loma basin Nn. 3 L.S. L.S. 3:t,UVJ Inlet -`<• Typn ;•? inlet3 ^'. Ea. St, 5,i0. U: 2'4,-~~.'.. 55. 2A" 12-Ga. Corrugated 54•L.F. 540. 00 a2, 260 Steel Pipa 56. 9'-6"x 6'-S" Corrugate 136 I_.F. f225 .00 f30,b00 Steel Pin?-arch 57. 6' Chain-Ink fence 10500 I-.F. f5 .00 S0. 58. 4' 'Walk Gates 7.6 Ea. 5300 .On f7,-n.~ q.9, t5' Shan-Ink Double Z Ea. f1,200 .c'• iC.~.^~~'. Orive rate E0. 16' f_hain-link Onuble 2 Ea. (1,500 .00 t'+,OC~) Drivf Gate F, 1. Pipe Gate 6 Ea. f800 .Or: tfi,a0:~ 6:. Type 36P Grate 23 Ea. E300 .Ori 1R ,'>n0 63. Water Line Relocation, 48 L.F, f100 .04 L4 80~~ Hermosa AvenuR 64. Water Line Relocation, 68 L.F. f100 .Op 35,^C :~ Hillside Road 65. Water Line Relocation, 12 L.F. f10U .00 (1,200 Wilson Avenue 66. Inlet "9", Hermosa 1.5. L.S. f16 ,000 Avenue 67. Permanent Traffic Signs 6 Ea. f1D0 .00 f600 fiB. Traffic Markers 74 Ea. S40 .OU 4,'.,960 69. Field Office and L.S. L.S. 412 ,ODO laboratory TOTAL f2, 102,384 - gPN'IU"! t: U';p MrPrlA PD e.a-2 EXH1011 C PP^E 1 $fHEDUI_E r)F FO'U ~; •iST 4L1 I_I IMP 511M AMQUNTS ALTERNATIVE "P" f,ONigAC i i 7F.Mi ``~ ~~ DeGCr in+:on nin l+ Est sated Item Nr. Fr .ce ~n 4lor tlcl GuanL ty BI d Amount 1 flPar mG dnC Gr:.:pp Tn l° L. 5• E1Q11, 111,1(, 2. Trarr,c C,•'rcI ... L. S. s77,npp 3. bevel n. wate• S~:po1y L.S. L. S. slq.lii C e, F:n,=h:nn Ps:dw?v L s, L. S. s2.nnn 5. P. padwav Ecr a,va' ,n 7Ai e] f.Y. f~.OG x15,2U:: Mil !sl de P.oad, '.~'~ lean Avenue and Hermosa Aver:ue 6. F..ngl ar yement of Alta 4000 C.Y. (2.00 (8,00(1 Loma 6aalns No, t and No. 2 7. Excavation of Alta 36000 C.Y. (5.00 (180,000 I _,.3 rlgel n, Nn, i 8. Ditrh Excavation 23000 C.Y. f3.25 s74, 750 9. Class 2 Aggregate Base 1600 tons f12.00 s1g,200 10. Asphalt Conc rote 2100 tons f30.00 ff,3,000 11. Place Asphalt Concrete 600 S.V. fR.00 f4, 800 (Misc. Ar eae7 12. Place Aspha~t Concrete 400 L.F. (5.00 12,000 Dike 13. Asphalt Emulsion 2 tone f500.00 f1, 000 (Paint Binder? 14. Drlveaey and Driveway 500 S.Y. f12.00 f6,000 Approach 15. Concrete Sidewalk 500 S.Y. f10.00 f5,000 76' wldel i6. furb and Gutter 2200 L.F. f5.25 (11,550 17. 16" Splash Glrb 700 L.F. f5.00 f3, 500 18. Concrete for 2500 C.Y. (120.00 (300, 000 Trapem last Channel 19. Reinforcement Steel 147000 LDe, f0.40 f58,800 for Trapezoidal Channel 20. Concrete for 520 C.Y. f220.00 (714,400 Rectangular Channel 21. Reinter cement Steel 103000 LDe. (0.40 (41,200 for Roc tangular Channel 22. Concrete for 250 C.Y, f220.00 f55,000 Trdn91 t10n3 23. Reinforcement Steel 35000 Lbs. (0.40 (/4,000 for Transltlona F.X:I 151 i •' Pn•ri{ 2 p 4l r: rt) ~: W: AMi /1•a a;, {14-~ D••arr~nt~~n i::n.• rg. imu rod Itam rio. >r,r.+ .n pbr^,-,1 In,4n.,t: B,d '~ Nmun• 24. toner?t? lr,r tff'y R' Pfd ,;,'1. f325,Qf. ~ i°n,ni:n w 9n• Culy?rt ~`r 25. R?. r,for vment Steal 24000 Lbs. f0.40 f9,GV0 for +0'x .9' Bn. Culy?rt O 7 rnn: .?.q .r - ?' tin r f^^. .Oii .e2,~:.n~ V BOY r.UIVP.rt 27. Re enforcement St??V 45'MO Lbs. t0.4G f78,OG,l 2A. Concrete fnr Do~.,b to 455 C,v. f90^.M f+96.50n P..'x 6' 8~~x culvert 29. n+,nforcen:ent Ste?~ 000iJ0 Los. f0.40 f36,C9Q fnr Double A'r F" Bnx (uivort 90. foncrete for Arta SEO f.. ~'. (200.00 ftt2,00G lrrme Ra~~n r.:n, Z Soil~way 37. Re enter cem?nt S:ael 7A000 Lbs. (0.40 191,:00 for Alta Loma Basin No. 3 Soiliwav 32. Concrete for So~llway 180 C.Y. f200.00 f36,000 Sta. 3.62 to Sta. 4.42 33. Relniorcement 5tee~ 7000 Lbs. f0.40 f2, 800 for Spillway Sta. 3x62 t4 Sta. 4.47 34. Modlfy Haven Storm L.S. l.S. (5,000 Drain Inlet 35. Rock, light Class, for 1900 f..Y. f72.00 f22,800 foncreted-rock Slope Proter.t ron 36. Minor f-oncrete for , 760 C.Y. f50.00 (38,000 Concreted-rock Slope Protection 37. Rock, i-ton Class, fnr 700 C.Y. f/2.00 (8,400 Pock Slope Pr ofection 38. 48" RCP (1350-D) 64 L.F, (100.00 (6,400 39. 36" RCP !1500-D) 24 L.F. f100.00 f2,400 40. 36" RCP (1350-D1 7A L.F. f70.00 55,460 41. 36" RCP 11350-D) 306 L.F, f90.00 f27,540 Concrete encased 42. 33" Rf,P 11350-D1 576 L.F, (60.00 f34,560 43. 33" RCP (1350-0) 72 L.F. fR0.00 (4,320 44. 30" RCP 17500-D) 86 L.F. f58.00 f4,?8g 45. 30" Rf.P (1350-07 34 L.F. (68.00 f1,972 46. 24" RCP (1500-D1 80 l•F. f54.00 54,320 47. 24" RCP 11350-p7 128 l.F. S50.Oq f6, 41x) 4R. Manhole "A" 3 Ea. f2,On0.00 16,000 49. Ce tch Bps m No. 1 6 Ea. (2,700.00 f16,200 50. fetch Basrn No. 3 1 Ea. f3,700.00 f3,700 51. 70" VCP San~tarv 72 L.F, f70.00 (5,040 Sewer, Her mo~a Avenue 52. Sanitary Snwm Manhole, 1 Ea. (400.00 f400 Her mesa Avenue S3. Alta Loma Uanin No. 3 4.5. 1.5. f15,000 NAIA {FI fir AN~rJ:A 4t1 .4d-~ fig=tr ior: nn (U~„ ' E9t~mite4 Inl..• 54. Ty;c ,;N? I,.: ets 21 Ea. 55. 2d^ 17-fia. Cor ramated 54 LF. Stems' Pipn Sfi. 9•-R^, E'-5" forruga+e 135 L.F. ;+....I n.c.-~.-r. 57. 6' +:hain-pink fence tG500 LF 59, 4' Walk Oates 24 ca. 54, t5• fha~n-ain't Doubt? 2 Ea. 0•~ve ,ate 60. 19' fhain-I,nk Double 2 Ea. fir ~~~ talc " P: ne fate 8 Ea. S2• Tvn< ;RF Gate 2+ Ea. 63. Wa *.er lin? and oca: on. 4A L.F. Me•mnsn Avenue F4. Wqt+r L,n., Relr.-nt:o^ .~ L.F. Hi~IaidS Rnad 65. Water Llne Relocation, 12 L.F. W,laon Avenue 5fi. Inlet "8", Mermnsa L.S. AV enIIP 67. Permanent Tratfic Signs 6 Ea. 6R. Traffic Markers 60 Ea. 69. Field Office and L.S. Laboratory TOTAL EXHIUIT : rA.,r 3 9~d Anr.ur~' st,:n0 ,0n y>* ^cq ir..0 .1?~i f2,°00 f4 .5n f4i,2~0 ~~ f250 f5n0 .0n .On i9. r:0n f!.'00 ~`~ iRnn .nn f+.~oo f SR.'1 . GII f4. d?f s9oo .r?n f5. er.^, f+4G .00 tS, R:y0 f400 .00 (4,800 L.S. (9,000 f20D .00 ft,200 f40 .00 f2, 400 L.S. f2,500 (1,929,190 EXHIBIT D RANCHO CUCA:Jr7NuA AO ;14-2 EXH101T ^ nd,,r . EXH121T D ASSES Sl.!F NT Nn. FAYVF~:'c TAX A55EcS0i ti'i. ilSinlP'IQN PR'cLIN!t!A ^n l' i(~`:=li~~'~O p'~:•„ i':. .. ,__ BOON PAGE PAR TFA('T NO./l0T ASSf SSn!ENi ASSESSVF NT t"OLL ci'I~.\ Tn L 201 71 5 55,209.59 201 71 6 f3f;,4f 7. 12 201 71 25 f65,274.08 201 71 2F f5R,309.52 201 7+ 35 feR,il2.ng 201 71 3F 459,934,5E 201 P3 4g 39t,A57.an 201 A3 47 fa,11f• 7F. ant e3 48 f17 ,771.59 201 P3 49 315,245,71 201 137 iF 11F09/ 1 54,845.68 207 132 17 11609/ 2 f4,5A 1.37 201 137 18 11609/ 3 f4,SA1.37 201 132 19 11F09/ 1 f4,270,96 201 132 20 11609/ S f4,317.OF 201 132 21 11609/ F (4,405.17 201 132 22 9441/ 44 E4, 140,46 201 132 23 9441/ 43 54,140.86 201 132 74 8441/ 42 f4,140.AF 201 132 25 9441/ 47 f4,052.75 201 132 ?6 9441/ 46 f4,052.75 201 132 27 9441/ 45 54,228.96 201 142 17 9441/ 54 f4,052.7$ 201 142 18 9441/ $3 f4,052.75 201 142 19 9441/ 62 f4,317.06 201 142 20 9441/ 51 f4,052.75 201 142 21 9441/ SO (4,052.75 201 142 22 9441/ 49 (4,052.7$ 201 142 23 9441/ 4A (4,052.75 201 142 24 9447/ 41 f4,140.86 201 142 25 0441/ 40 fa,052.75 201 142 CF 9441/ 39 (4,052.75 201 142 27 X441/ ;8 f4,052.75 201 142 26 9441/, 37 (3,464.65 201 142 29 94411 ;F s3,96a,65 201 142 30 9441/ 35 f4 ,062.15 201 152 1 f3,A 12.24 201 152 13 (4,052.75 201 152 14 fa,052,75 201 152 16 9441/ 10 fa,140.Ar, 201 152 17 9441/ 4 ;4,140.?il-. 201 151 18 9441/ A (4,052.75 _ RANCHO CUCAMONC;A AD 34-<' .~ - A,^,SF~E '.'E':' t:^ . PAYh+ENTS TqX A$ $`c $511P NO. DESCRIPTION pREI IMINARY CONFIRMED OUgI N'3 CASH A!1'~U^ - 80pK PJ. ~2 PAR TRACT Nil./LOT A55t$SMENi A5$ES Stdc Ni CULLE: TICIN TO Lic -. 201 152 19 5441/ 7 54,057.75 ?R1 '`<' R 54d 1~ P Rd,Q52,7F - ?01 152 21 9441/ 34 5d ,0$2.75 _ 201 tfi2 22 94d 1/ 33 54,052.75 201 152 23 9441/ 32 54,057.75 - 201 152 cA AA41/ 31 S4,nS2.75 201 162 25+ 9441/ 30 s4, 140.86 201 152 ?F 9d41/ 29 54,220.96 701 152 ^7 paa l/ 2A x4,052.'6 -- 2C1 1F3 17 6441/ 27 f4,052.7y 2n7 1F3 1A 9441/ 2C S4,p52.7K - 201 1F' 19 0441/ 25 54,052.75 201 173 1 11809/ 7 (4,405.17 201 17~ 11809/ R 54,228.96 201 173 3 11609/ 9 x4, 14p.RF 201 173 d 11F09/ 10 f4,493.27 2ni 173 5 7100"09/ 11 f4,5A 1.37 201 173 F 11609/ 12 f4,581.37 201 17.3 7 0441/ fit S4,i17.OF 201 173 8 9441/ F1 f4, 140.88 201 173 9 9441/ 60 f4, tA0.E5 201 173 f0 9441/ 66 54,052.75 201 173 11 9441/ 64 54,052.75 c^01 173 12 9441/ 63 f4,27ft .9F 201 173 13 f171,45A.75 201 422 1 10045/ 16 f7,400.68 201 422 2 10045/ 15 f4,O5c^.75 201 422 3 10045/ 14 f3,876.55 201 42? 4 10045/ 13 54,052.75 201 421 5 10045/ 12 (3,984.85 c^M 422 F 10045/ 11 f4, 1AO,BF 201 422 7 10045/ 10 f4,052.T5 201 422 A t00A5/ 9 f4,052. 75 201 427 9 tOn45/ 8 f4,05?. 75 201 972 10 +01145/ 7 s3,964.F5 201 427 it 10045/ F 54,4+13.27 201 4:2 t2 t0i14 ~/ 5 x4,228.96 201 422 13 10045/ 4 t4,052. 75 201 d2^ t4 10045/ 3 f3,R64.F5 201 42. 15 10(145/ 2 f4,4n5, 17 201 422 1F 10045/ 1 f4,A45,68 2n1 do4 t t2°37-1/ 1 54,2?P.06 2n1 444 12_°037.1/ 2 54,2221,aF 201 4A4 3 1,'.2:•7.1: 3 f4, 1AO,Ofi 201 4d4 4 1::,97-1/ 4 F4, t4n,n0 201 444 1:: X7-1: 5 54,14(1,06 2111 .14A 6 1; 2,97- 1! 6 f4, 1A 11,HF RAyCHn CuCn6SnNGn AD 64-2 E:CHIO'? D PAtiE 3 A$SFSSME':T N T A`( AeeEgenP 8001( PAGE 2!11 44e 201 4»4 201 444 201 444 201 444 201 444 201 dqq 207 444 2Dt 4d4 201 452 201 4°2 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 45? 201 457 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 152 201 452 201 452 2n1 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 4113 201 469 2111 463 201 463 2111 4113 201 4114 1. I:n. D~FrPiPTIOr: PAP iRA GT yr,/l OT 7 12237-1/ 7 e. 122x7-v s g 1223'-1/ 9 ,0 12237- v ,o 11 1'c 237-1/ 11 12 12237-t/ 12 13 12237-1/ 19 14 12237-1/ 14 15 12237-1/ iR t 12237-2/ 9 2 12237-2/ 3 12237-27 ? a 1223'-2/ to $ 12217-2/ 1~ R 12237-7/ 12 7 12237-2/ t3 A 12237-2/ 14 9 12237-2/ 15 10 12237-2/ 16 11 12237-2/ 17 12 12237-2/ 1A 13 12237-2/ 19 14 12237-2/ 20 15 12237-2/ 21 16 12237-2/ 72 17 12237-2/ 23 18 12237-2/ c'4 19 12237-2/ 75 20 12237-2/ 26 21 12237-2/ 27 22 12237-2/ 2A 23 12237/ 8 24 12237/ 9 25 12237/ 10 26 1c^^237/ 11 27 12237/ 72 2A 12237/ 13 ?4 12237/ 1a 30 12237/ 15 31 12237/ 16 32 12237/' 17 33 12287/ to 34 12237/ 19 1 12237/ i 2 12237/ 2 3 12: .7/ 3 4 12237/ 4 S 1 ,' i / 6 1..^2;17/ 6 PRFI Ir.SI r!A 9V ASSESSMEN` f4,22R.~r', s4,3.7.ca sa,317.Od f4,2?A.~fi f4,22F.. QE f4,140.A6 54,140.RA f4,140.Afi f4t4n.P.E f4,052.75 54,052.75 54 ,052.'S 44.052.75 f4 ,052.75 f4, 140.AF s4,-2e.ss f4,22R.96 54,052.75 (4,062.75 f4,052.75 f4 ,052.75 f4,052.75 f4,052.75 f4,22A.96 54,052.75 f4,052,75 f4, 140.Afi f4,140.86 f4,052.75 (6,726.72 f5,55n,51 (4,052.76 (4,052.75 54 ,5A 1.37 56,638.61 f4 „SR 1.37 (4,052.75 s4,DS2.75 fa ,052.75 f4 ,5A 1.97 55,550.51 t4,^20.9fi (4,4115,17 f4, 140,06 54,22A .'d F'~ Sn,1nn.Ac (4,052.75 rn,lnn,n~:, f4 ,1152,75 PAYMtNiS rnvPIRME:D DURIrr= r4cF+ A•/~~_~• ASSESS61`r NT COLE FC7ION TG ~_ : E RAD1CI1p CU^AMO":GA AD P4-2 EXHIBIT i? PA~:;E 4 AJSCJSh~E Ii7 NQ . TAX AS SESS/1F r;n. pISCRIPTIQN BOO,t PA!,E PFR TRAl7 Nip. /LC1T 2n1 463 7 12237/ 7 2nt d53 0 12237/ <20 201 ar',3 9 12237/ 21 201 4E'. 70 t^<237/ 22 201 qE3 11 12237/ 23 201 453 t2 12237/ 24 201 453 13 12237/ 25 201 4F' 14 12237/ 26 201 4r.3 t5 1223%/ 27 201 4p,3 tF 12237/ 29 PREI IMINAP.V QINFiRMED AS5E3SAtE NT A55t SSMENT 54,0`.2 .75 nJ,iG J..°. F', A4 ,052 .75 f4,14n.ftE 54,220.9E s0,810.33 E7,g1i4 .40 fF,072.Ve 51•.079.13 517,444.46 2n1 521 5 12237-2/ 1 E4,14D .kF 201 5^t fi 12237-2/ 2 f4,140 .P5 201 c2+ ~ 12227-'_/ 4 fa,140 .Rf _ 201 921 9 12237-2/ 5 (4,140 .85 _ 201 921 9 12237-'</ 6 f4,14R .6E 201 971 tD 12237-2/ 7 (4,140 .85 - 201 971 11 12237-1/ 16 f4,140 .8F 201 971 12 12237-1/ 17 f4,140 .8E _ 201 921 13 12237-1/ 18 f4,140 .86 - 201 971 14 12237-1/ 19 f4,140 .86 201 921 15 1223)-1/ 20 f4, 140. 85 - 201 921 1F 12237-1/ 21 f4,1A0 ,8F 2n1 s21 17 12237- v zz sa,lan .ae 201 971 16 12237-1/ 23 f4, 140 .e6 - 201 521 19 12237-1/ 24 54,140. 85 - 2n1 911 20 122'.7-1/ 25 f4,140. 8F 201 971 21 12237-1/ 26 f4, 140. 8E -_ 201 921 22 12237-1/ 27 f4,140. P6 201 921 23 12237-1/ 28 (4,140 .85 - 201 921 24 12237-1/ 29 f4, 140, 06 201 921 25 12237-1/ 30 f4,140. 05 201 971 9 9441/ 72 (4,226. 95 201 971 10 9441/ 71 (4,317. 06 201 971 11 9441/ 70 f4,317. 06 - 201 971 12 9441/ 59 f4,052. 75 201 571 13 5441/ 5g (4,052. 75 -- 2n1 071 14 9441/ 07 (4,052. 75 _ 2n1 C71 iS 9441/ 66 f4,n52. 75 201 971 1F 9441/ 59 54,140. 5E 201 971 17 94e 1/ FB s4,140 . !t6 201 911 i6 9441/ F7 f9, 14n, dF 201 971 1g 9441/ 5F f4,052. 75 201 971 20 9441/ 55 54,140. 85 - 2n1 491 29 9441/ 20 fa,278. 9F, 201 491 30 9J41/ tg f4,n61'. /S - 201 9111 31 n4q 1/ 1E 54,140. 86 - 201 41;1 9JJ 1/ 17 f4, 14ii. `d; 2111 951 3' 9nJ 1/ 15 9.4,7?R. OF, PAVMENTi. DARING ~: ACH A1,1i ~i,J'. COLLEC TIt'iN i0 ~Ic RAnIrrRO fUf Ar.~nNr,A AD 54-2 ASSFSSMEIiT Np . TAX AS SESSi1R Nn, DICrRIVTI nN PR EC IMINARY CDNFIR!,AF.D EnpK PAGE Pna TRACT NO. /l'iT ASSESS0.~E NT ASSESSMENT 201 ?81 3d 9441/ 15 xq,22R,a8 201 381 ?5 Sa41! 1q x4.?+7.0'; 201 SAi ,°.8 9441/ 1'. 54,140,fi8 201 981 i7 x+441/ 12 (4.052.75 201 981 i8 9441/ 11 t4,140.f8 201 ?F1 ?9 4441/ $ f4,052.75 <<^O1 9Pt 40 9441/ 4 f4,052.75 201 981 41 9441/ 3 (4,052.75 ?Ot c8+ e2 qay'/ 2 (4,052.75 201 981 43 9441/ 1 f4,052.75 201 g91 10 04A 1/ 24 (4,052.75 ?07 9^1 ti 9441/ 23 14,0.`,2.75 20t Qa1 12 qaa t; ?2 f4,052.T5 201 Sgt 13 8441/ 21 54,05:.75 108! 571 4 9441/ 21 538,305.80 FXHIR!T 0 Pa ;E 5 PAYME'Ji^-, pIIR I N„ 1'ASR AM1'OL"~ l:Dll E!'TIr~N m LIE CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE RAFJCHO WCAM9•'JGA AD ^~4-2 EXHI011 D PA r,F 6 PAYME"JTS ASSESSMFIJT Nn, DES('glPTinrJ PRE! IAn NARY Ci mJFIRMED OURIN, ~'ABIi 4M:;•' TRACT LOT TRACT NO./i OT A55ESSMFtJ7 ASSESSMENT LOLL Ei:11ON i0 L'E 1004E 1 10046/ 1 54,123,<24 10046 2 t00n6/ 2 84,132,05 10046 3 1004ti/ 3 54,0711.37 10046 4 10048/ 4 E4,052.75 10046 5 10046/ 54,043.94 10048 6 10046/ F E4,pa3,9a 1004E 7 10(146/ 7 (4,052.75 tOn 45 8 10046/ 8 54 ,n`; ,,c 10046 9 1004!./ ? E4,057.75 1004E 10 1004E/ 10 x4,09(,0' 11i04F 11 1(:1:146 tf x4,05; .7~ 1004(. 12 1004./ 1? 54,049.9A 1!104F 13 10 f14F/ 13 14,079, 1P 10046 14 tOn4R/ U (4,057.76 10048 15 1004F/ 15 f4,n70.;47 100x6 +6 10048/ 16 tq, 13: .OS 1004E 17 10046/ 17 (4,070.:;7 1004E 16 10046/ 18 (4,043.94 10046 19 10046/ 19 54,043,94 10048 70 10046/ 20 S4. 1B4 .91 1001E 21 10046/ 21 f4, 132 .115 1004E 22 10046/ 22 f4, 149.67 10046 23 10046/ 23 f4, 149.67 10046 24 10046/ 24 (4,202.53 10046 25 10048/ 25 f4,T61.R2 10048 26 10046/ 2F (4,123.24 10046 27 10045/ 27 f4,09F.8i 10047 1 10047/ 1 56,325.62 10047 2 10047/ 2 f4,343.49 10047 3 10047/ 3 f4,369.93 10047 4 10047/ 4 (4,290.63 10047 5 10047/ 5 (5,2.50 .9F 10047 6 10047/ 6 f4,246.5ft 10047 7 10047/ 7 f4,3f 9.99 10047 8 10047/ 8 f4, 187,29 10047 R 10047/ 9 S4,Of 1.SR 10047 10 10047/ 1n tn, 140,87 1004' 11 10047/ 11 E4, 129.74 10047 12 10047/, 12 f4, 1fi7.29 10047 13 10047/ 13 f4, 105.62 100A7 14 10047/ 14 f4, 176. 10 10047 15 10047/ 15 fa,25S.3g 101147 1f 10047/ 16 54,149.(,7 10L1A7 17 10047/ !7 f4,396.96 10047 1R 101147/ to 54,9; S,fl7 1(1047 1R 111 lln7/ 19 54,3P,A .l; f.1 10(147 <4^0 101147/ 20 f4,OYl1. 17 101147 21 1111147/ 21 54 ,11 (t i. Sf~ 101)47 .'.2 1017 A'ii ^: S4,11~~1. {i t1 RANCHO CUCAM(R1GA AD ?~4-2 A55F °. SNF'JT Nn, DESC PIpT It7N PPEI ~h!IMARY •`.'!1"!F IPA'FO T RAFT LOT TPACT ;4p,/LO T ASSCggt,'E'JT A`•S.E FSh1F PIT 100e7 eo •0047/ 2? 34.?69.x? 10047 2-0 10pa7/ 24 fa,i67.~9 10047 25 tOnd7/ 25 fe ,079. 16 10047 76 10047/ 76 fd,132.06 10947 27 tU047/ 27 f4,11d.43 10047 2P. 10047/ 20 (4,184.91 10947 29 10047/ 23 56,10$.$6 10047 30 10047/ 30 f4,3 TR,. 17 10 C:47 '.1 19047/ xd,agg.g3 19047 32 10047/ 32 f4,a 1;9.9F "0047 33 tOn47/ ?3 f4,ad9.22 1nne7 $4 1C1p47: ?4 x5,nr5.g4 10047 ;!$ 1C11147/ '.6 f$,1:7. t"1 "0047 ?.6 10047/ ?6 f4, iR4.91 tpD47 37 10047/ 37 f4,070.3i 10047 38 10n47/ 38 f4,M0.37 tn,p q7 ?0 1n047/ ?9 f4,U711 .','•7 10047 40 10047/ 40 (4,167.29 10047 41 10047/ 41 f4,3fi 1. 12 10047 42 10047/ 42 (4,493,27 10047 43 10047/ 43 (4,651.86 TOTALS EXHIBIT D P4•;F 7 PAtiT"F ;JT =• f111R IN6 r'A SH ~"•'L•", i:ILLECTIIIN iU (,_ RNIf.HO ~UC'.P.MCPI +A AO 64-2 D ISfRIPTIOFI PRELIMIPJARY CfPJF IAMED p(A1It PAGE PPA TRAfT PK1. /10T ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 2M 71 5 f5,209.59 f5,209.59 701 71 6 f3F,467. 1J S3F,467.12 ?Oi 71 25 f6F,273.66 fF6, 273.08 ,201 71 ?6 f5F,309.57 T`F, 309.52 701 71 36 f4P, 112.OP ' f4R,112.OB 701 71 3F f53,934.56 453,934.5E 701 83 4P f91,P57.30 f91,°57.30 201 P; 47 f9, 11F.76 59,11E .7B 701 fl3 4P f17, 773.69 517,773.89 ?O1 B3 49 f15,245.71 515,245.71 201 132 1F 11603/ 1 (4,645.66 (4,645.68 701 132 17 11F09/ 2 S4,SP.1.37 f4, SP1.37 201 132 16 11609/ 3 f4,5P1.37 S4, SP 1.37 701 137. 19 11609/ 4 f4,22P.9F f4,22$.9F 201 132 20 11F09/ 5 54,317.06 f4,317.Of• 201 137 21 11603/ fi f4,405.17 54,405,17 ?O1 132 22 9441/ 44 f4, 140.8E f4, 140.P6 701 137 23 0441/ 43 f4, 140.66 f4, 140.66 701 132 74 9441/ 42 f4, 140.86 f4, 140.66 201 132 25 9441/ 47 f4,057.75 f4,052.75 20i 3441: 46 E4,052.75 E4,057.75 201 137 27 9441/ 45 f4,22B.9F (4,228.96 201 14? 17 9441/ 54 (4,057.75 (4,052.75 201 147 16 9441/ 53 f4,052.75 (4,052.75 201 142 19 9441/52 (4,317.06 f4,317.Ofi 701 147 20 9441/ 51 (4,052.75 f4, 052.15 201 142 21 9441/ 50 f4, 052,75 ;4,052.75 701 147 Z2 9441/ 49 f4,057.76 f4,052.75 201 142 23 9441/ 4B f4,05?.75 f4, 052.75 701 147 24 9441/ 41 f4, 140,66 f4, 140.66 70i 142 25 9441/ 40 f4, OS?.75 f4,052.75 701 142 25 9441/ 39 (4,052.75 (4,052.76 201 142 27 9441/ RB f4,05?.75 f4,052.75 2111 142 2P 9441/ 37 f3,9F4.65 f3,9fi4.65 ?01 147 29 9441/ 3F f3,9F4.65 (3,964.65 201 142 30 9441/ 35 (4,057.75 f4,052.75 701 152 1 (3,61274 f3,612.74 701 152 13 f4,05?.75 (4,052.75 201 157 14 •f4,057.75 f4,O62.76 201 152 16 9441/ 10 f4, 140.P6 f4, 140.NF ?M 152 17 9441/ 9 f4, 140.P6 f4, 140.A5 701 152 16 8441/ 6 54,057.75 (4,057.75 701 157 19 9441/ 7 f4,052.75 f4,057.75 701 152 2C1 9441/ F (4,05?.76 , f4, 052.75 201 157 21 9441/ 34 f4,052.75 f4,O52.75 ?01 15? 27 9441/ 33 54,057.75 (4,052,75 201 1S,^ 73 9441/ 32 f4,C157.75 S4, C157. 75 EXH101T D PnGF t PAYMENTS DUR IPf3 CASH AMOIIPJT LOLL ECiION TO LIEN fWJOHO fl1CAMOFIGA AD 84-? D ISCR IPT ICJd PTIF,LIMINAflV BOOK PACE PAA TRAI'.T N0./l0T ASSESSMFNI 201 152 24 9441; 31 (4.052.75 201 152 25 9441/ 30 f4,140.PR 201 152 25 9441/ 79 f4,?20.9F 201 157 27 9441/ 2ft f4,U52.7S E Y,N101T 0 PAGE 2 PAYMENTS CC4IF IRMFO 01 Iq ifG CASH AM()LYJT ASSESSMENT COLLECT ICIN TO LIEN (4,052.7°. f4,140.PF f 4,22R.9F f4,OSZ.iS - ?01 163 17 9441/ 27 (4,052.75 (4,052.75 201 163 10 9441/ ?F fq,052.75 54,052.75 201 163 19 9441/ 25 (4,057.75 f4,U52. 75 201 1S3 1 11609/ 7 (4,405.17 (4,405.17 201 173 2 t1F09/ R f4,22R.9F (4,229.96 201 173 3 11609/ 9 f4, 140.RR f4, 14D.R6 _ 201 173 4 11F09/ 10 44,4 X3.27 f4,493.77 201 173 5 11609/ 11 ;4 ,Sn1.37 f4,5F1.37 201 173 F 11009/ 12 (4,501.37 S4,SR1.37 701 173 7 9441/ F2 f4,317.05 f4,317 ,05 201 173 P 94d 1/ 61 (4,140.06 f4, 140.A6 _ 201 173 9 9441/ FO f4, 140.8E f4,140.86 - 201 173 1D 9441/ F5 S4,D52.75 f4,052.75 ?O1 173 11 9441/ 64 f4 ,057.75 54,1152.75 - 201 173 12 9441/ F3 44,220.9E 54,220.9E -- 201 173 13 (171,456.75 (171,455.75 - 201 422 1 10045/ 16 f7,400,60 (7,400.68 _ 201 422 2 10045/ 15 f4,062.75 ;4,052.75 2M 42Z 3 10045/ 14 f3.876,55 (3,076.55 - ?01 422 4 10045/ 13 (4,057-75 (4,052.7.5 201 427 5 10045/ 12 (3,954.65 f3 ,9F4 .FS ?O1 427 F 10045/ 11 54,140.86 f4,140.96 201 422 7 10045/ 10 (4,052.75 (4,052.75 _ Z01 472 0 1(1(145/ 9 (4,05?.75 (4,052.75 - 201 42<^. R 10045/ 0 f4,05?.75 f4,052,7$ 201 A22 t0 10045/ 7 f3,954.65 f3,9fi4,65 201 422 11 10045/ 6 f4,493.27 f4,493.27 - ?01 422 12 10045/ 5 f4,228.96 44,220.96 201 422 13 10045/ 4 f4,052.7F f4,052. 75 201 42Z 14 10045/ 3 f3,954.65 53,904.fi.5 201 d22 IS 10045/ 2 (1,405.17 54,405.17 ' 201 422 1F 100x5/ 1 f4,045.60 f4,B45.68 ?R1 444 1 17237-t/ 1 (4,228.96 f4,2Z8.95 201 444 7 1^_237-1/ 44,220.9fi 44,229.9E ' 201 444 3 12237-1/ 3 'f4, 140.RF f4, 140.06 201 444 q 12237-1/ 4 f4, 140,0E f4, 140.PR 201 444 S 12237-1/ S f4, 140.0E f4, 140.R6 ' 201 444 F 12237-1/ f, f4, 140. Hfi f4,140.0R 2R1 444 7 12237-1/ 7 44,220.9E (4,270.96 201 444 0 12237.1/ 0 f4,317.OR f4,317.06 201 444 9 12037-1/ 9 (4,317 AR fA,317.OF - TO1 Add 10 12237-1/ 10 f4,220.9R f4,22R .9F 201 444 tt 12297-ti 11 f4,2Cn.~tR tn,220,9F _ 701 444 12 1223?-1/ 12 f4,140.RF f4, 140,00 -. ?01 444 13 12237-1/ t3 f4, 140 ,RF f4, 140, R1i RlJJCFk~ CUCAMOtY~A FD 84-2 OISCR IPTIOtI PREL IMI NaRY CCPIP IRMEO ROrut PA ,E PAP TRAf.T tgl,/LOT ASSESSIIFNT ASSE55MCNT 201 444 14 12237-1/ 14 f4, 140, Rfi f4, 140.86 ?01 444 15 12237-1/ 15 f4, 140.A6 54, 140.A6 201 452 1 12237-2/ 3 f4,052.75 (4,052.75 701 a5.2 122'7-2/ A (4,052.75 (4,052.75 2M 457 3 12237-2/ 9 f4,057.75 • f4,052.75 201 457 4 12237-2/ 10 f4,057.75 f4,052.75 701 452 S 12237-2/ 11 (4,052.75 (4,052.75 201 457 6 12237-2/ 12 f4, 140.86 f4, 140.86 7O/ 452 7 12237-2/ 13 f4,228.96 54,228.96 201 45? 9 12237-2/ 14 (4,229.96 f4,228.A6 ?O1 457 9 12237-2/ 15 f4,052.75 f4,052.75 201 452 10 12237-2/ ifi (4,057.75 (4,052.75 701 452 11 12237-2/ 17 f4,057.75 f4,052.7.5 201 457 12 12237-2/ IB 54,057.75 54,052.75 2(11 457 13 12237-2/ 19 (4,057.75 f4,052.75 201 457 14 12237-2/ 20 54,052.75 f4,052.75 ?O1 452 15 12237-2/ 71 54,22A.96 f4,22A.96 201 457 16 12237-2/ 22 f4,057. 75 (4,052.75 201 452 17 12237-2/ 73 (4,057.75 (4,052.75 201 452 1A 12237-2/ 24 f4, 140.A6 f4, 140.A6 201 452 19 12737-2/ 25 54,140.66 54, 140.A6 201 452 20 12237-2/ 76 f4,052.75 f4,052.75 201 452 21 12237-2/ 77 f5,726.72 f5, 72A.71 201 452 22 12237-2/ 2B (5,550.51 (5,550.51 701 452 23 12237/ A (4,052.75 (4,052.75 201 452 24 12237/ 9 f4,052.75 44,052.75 201 452 25 12237/ /0 (4,581.37 54 ,SA1.37 201 462 26 12237/ 11 f5,638.F1 f5,630.61 201 452 27 12237/ 12 f4,5A 1.37 f4,561.37 701 457 2P 12237/ 13 (4,052.75 (4,052.75 201 452 29 12237/ 14 f4,052.75 ;4,052.75 201 452 30 12237/ 15 (4,052.75 ;4,052.75 201 457 31 12237/ 16 S4, Sfl1.37 f4,5A1.37 701 452 32 12237/ 17 (5,550.51 55,650.51 201 452 3i 12237/ 1B f4,228.96 f4,228.P6 201 452 34 12237/ 19 (4,405,17 f4,405.17 201 463 1 12237/ 1 f4, 140.A6 f4, 140.A6 ?01 463 2 12237/ 2 f4,220.96 ;4,22fl .96 701 463 3 12237/ 3 f4, 140.86 f4, 140.A6 ?01 463 4 12737/ 4 f4,052.75 ;4,057.75 201 4A3 5 12237/ 5 f4, 140,A6 ;4,140.86 201 46i 6 12237/ 6 54,G57.75 (4,052.75 201 463 7 12237/ 7 ;4,052.75 (4,052.75 201 463 R 12237/ 20 54,140.A6 f4, 140.86 201 463 9 12237/ 21 f4,057.75 f4,052.76 701 4F.', 10 12237/ 22 f4, 140.A6 f4,140.A6 201 463 11 12297/ 23 f4,22A.9A. (4,228 A6 701 463 12 12297/ 24 fA,B10 99 fA,A10.33 781 463 13 12237/ 75 f7,6R4,99 (7,664.90 2(11 463 14 12237/ 26 ffi,R72,06 fR,A72.06 701 463 16 12237/ 27 (6,079. i3 f6,070. 13 EXHipli D PAGC 3 PAYMENTS 0110IPX; CASH AMi4MT COLLECTION TO LIEN RANf.HO COrAMi11JUA AO 84-: DIS~RIPTIOIJ PRELIMINARY C01 iF IRMED Bfa1X PASF PPA TRAf.i NO./LIST ASSE SSMFNT ASSFSSMEIIi 2M 463 16 122.'.7/ 26 f17,4d4.46 f17,444.46 201 514 1 10047/ 1 f6,325.R2 f6,32S.R2 2M 514 2 10047/ 2 (4,343.4'3 f4, 343.49 M 614 3 10047/ 3 54,?Rq,?9 f4,3P9.93 201 514 4 10047/ 4 f4,290.63 54,290.63 201 514 6 10047/ 5 (5,250.96 S5,?60.:46 201 514 6 10047/ 6 f4,246.5R 54,746.56 201 51a 7 10047/ 7 f4,359.93 (4,369.93 701 514 R 10047/ R f4,167.29 f4,167.29 ?01 614 9 10047/ 9 f4,061.56 (4,061.56 201 514 10 10047/ 10 f4, 149.67 f4, 149,67 201 514 11 tU047/ 11 f4, 123, 24 f4, 1?3.24 201 514 12 10047/ 12 f4, 167.29 ;4, tfi7.29 701 514 13 10047/ 13 f4, 105.62 f4,106.67 701 514 14 10047/ 14 (4,176.10 f4, 176.10 201 614 1S 10047/ 16 f4,255.39 f4,265.39 201 .514 16 10047/ 16 f4,149.67 ;4,149.67 201 524 1 10047/ 17 f4, 396.36 ;4,396.36 201 524 2 10047/ 1R f4,325.87 f4,3?5,67 201 574 3 10047/ 19 f4,334,6R f4,334.68 201 524 4 10047/ 20 f4,070.37 ;4,070.37 201 62! 5 10047! 2+. s4, 061.56 ;4,061.56 201 574 6 10047/ 22 f4,061.56 54,061.Sfi 201 524 7 1(X147/ ?3 (4,369.93 ;4,369.93 201 524 B 10047/ 24 f4, 167.29 (4,167.29 201 524 g 10047/ 25 f4,079.1R f4,079.1R 201 524 10 10047/ 26 f4,132.05 f4, 132.05 201 524 11 10047/ 27 f4,114.43 f4,i14.43 201 524 12 10047/ .26 f4, 164.91 ;4,164.91 201 524 13 10047/ 29 f6, 105.56 ;6,10.5.56 201 524 14 10047/ 30 f4,916.17 ;4,916.17 201 524 15 10047/ 31 ;4,369.93 (4,369.93 201 524 16 10047/ 32 f4,413.98 (4,413.98 201 524 17 10047/ 33 f4,449.22 f4,449.22 201 524 16 10047/ 34 55,065.94 (5,065,94 201 524 19 10047/ 35 55,127.61 ;5,127.61 201 524 20 10047/ 36 f4, 164.91 f4, 1R4.91 2M .524 21 10047/ 37 f4,070.37 (4,070.37 201 524 22 10047/ 36 f4,070.;97 f4,070.37 701 524 23 10047/ 39 f4,070.37 (4,070.37 ?01 52a 24 10047/ 40 (4,157.29 f4,167.?9 701 524 25 10047/ 41 .f4,361. 1? f4 ,361. 12 201 524 76 10047/ 47 (4,499,27 f4,493.27 201 524 27 10047/ 43 f4,651.A6 f4,651.Afi 201 53? 1 1004fi/ 1 f4,123.74 f4, 123.24 201 53? IUn46/ 2 f4,132. Ofi , f4,132.05 701 532 3 1004R/ 3 (4,070,37 (4,070.37 201 542 0 111046/ 4 f4,06?.75 (4,052,75 201 537 5 10046/ 5 (4,043.04 (4,043.94 701 532 F 10O4R/ 6 f4,043.94 (4,043.94 F XHIHIT D PAGF 4 PAYMENTS OIIR IPX; CASH .4MOU"!T COL LECTI(NJ TO LIEN 8M1CH0 flh'AMf4 fvA AD 84-2 OISCR IPT I(kt PRELIM RIAAY BC/?N PAfE PAA TRACT PIO, /L nT ASSESSMENT 201 S32 7 10046; 7 f4,0`.++2.75 701 532 A 10046/ A f4,062.75 201 532 9 10046/ 9 f4,052.76 201 532 10 10046/ 10 f9,09A.A1 201 637 11 +On46/ 11 f4,n52.75 201 532 12 1004fi/ 12 f9,043.34 201 532 13 1004F/ 13 f4 ,079. 1ft 201 592 14 10n46/ 14 f4,052.75 201 532 15 10046/ 15 f4,07fi. 37 201 632 !f 10046/ i6 f4, 192.05 201 537 17 10046/ 17 (4,070.37 201 592 1A 1004fi/ 1A f4,043.3q 201 532 19 10046/ 13 f4,043.94 201 432 20 10046/ 20 (9,184.91 7n1 53? 21 10096/ 2t f4, 132.05 201 432 22 10046/ 22 f4, 199.67 2n1 43? 23 10048/ 23 f4, 149.67 201 532 24 10046/ 24 f9,202.53 201 532 25 1004F/ 75 ;4,281,82 201 532 25 10046/ 26 54,123.24 201 532 27 10046/ 27 (4,096.81 201 971 5 12237-2/ 1 ;4, 140.Pfi 201 921 F 12297-2/ 2 f4; 140.Afi 201 921 7 12237-2/ 4 f4, 140.P6 201 921 A 12c^374/ 5 f4, 140.86 201 921 9 12237-2/ 6 f4, 140.86 201 921 10 12237-2/ 7 f4, 140.P6 201 921 11 12237-1/ 16 f4, 140.88 201 921 12 12237-1/ 17 f4, 140.86 201 021 13 12237-1/ 1A f4, 140.86 201 921 19 12237-1/ 19 f4, 14n.R6 201 921 16 12237.1/ 20 f4, 140.86 201 921 16 12237-1/ 21 f9, 140.8E 201 921 17 12237-1/ 22 f4, 140.86 201 921 1A 12237-1/ 23 f4, 140.A6 701 921 19 12237-1/ 24 f4, 140.66 201 921 20 12237-1/ 25 f4, 140.86 201 921 21 12237-1/ 26 f4, 140.P6 701 921 22 12237-1/ 27 f4, 140.98 ?Ot 921 23 12297-1/ 28 f4, 140.PF 201 921 24 12237-1/ 29 f4, 140.86 201 821 24 12237-1/ 30 f4, 140.86 701 071 9 9441r T2 f4,22A .96 701 971 10 9441/ 71 f4,317.OF 201 971 11 0441/ 70 f4, 317.06 201 971 12 9441/ R9 (4,057.75 201 971 13 9441/ F8 (4,062.75 201 971 14 9441/ 67 (4,052. 7f. 201 371 15 9441/ 6R (4,052.75 201 971 16 9441r °,9 f4, 140.88 201 871 17 9441/ SR f4, 140,86 PA,VMENTS CCf4FIP~MED D'~IR INfi CASH AMnUrIT ASSESSMENT COLLFCTION TO LIEN f4,U52.75 ;4,052.7,5 f4,052. 75 f4,OQ6.81 A4,n52.75 (4,043.99 (4,079.16 f4,O5Z,76 f4,n7B.s7 f4, 132.05 54,070.37 (4,043.94 (4,043.94 f4, 184.91 f4,13?.OS f4, 149,67 f4, 149.67 f4,202.53 F4,281.A2 f4, 123.24 54,096.61 54,140.86 ' f4; 140.86 f4, 140.86 f4, 140.66 f4, 140.86 f4, 140.86 f4,140.A6 f4, 140.86 f4, 140.A6 54, 140.Afi f4, 140.86 f4, 140,86 54,140.86 54, 140.A6 f4, 140.8fi f4, 140.86 f4, 14p.BF f4,140.A6 f4, 140.86 f4, 14C1, A6 f 4, 140.86 f4,22R.GR f4,317.0E (4,317.06 f 4,052.75 ;4,062.75 (4,052.75 f 4,Y1 ;2.75 f4, 140.08 f 4, 140.6fi RAfK'HU CUCAMffAiA AL A4-2 E ...IOIT o Pnc~ s PPYMFNTS 01 SI'R IPTION PRELIMI N^AY CIY~IF IRMCO OIIR IPNi CASH AMOLL^1T 9011K EASE PAA TAAC.T wr. /L l1T ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT Cf4.LECTION Tll I IEN 2n1 971 1R 9441/ S7 f4, 140.A5 ;4, 140.AA 201 971 19 9441/ 55 f4,p57,75 (4,052.75 701 971 20 9441/ 55 f4, 140.AR f4, 140.A5 201 ~A1 29 9441/ 20 f4,22A.95 f4,2^. R.9R 201 9A1 30 9441/ 1R (4,057.75• ;4,052.',5 201 9A1 31 9441/ 1R f4, 140.85 f4, 140.Rfi 201 9A1 37 9441/ 17 f4,140.Rfi f4, 140.A5 201 961 33 9441/ 1R f4,22A .9fi f4,27B.46 201 9A1 34 9441/ 15 (4,229.95 f4,2^.8.96 201 9A1 35 9441/ 14 ;4,317.05 ;4,317.06 701 9A1 36 9441/ 13 f4, 140.P5 f4, 140.A5 ?01 9A1 37 9441/ 12 f4,052.75 f4,052.75 701 9A1 3R 9441/ 11 f4, 140.Rfi E4,140.AR 701 981 39 4441/ 5 f4,052.75 ;4,052.75 201 9A1 40 9441/ 4 f4,057.75 f4,052.75 201 981 41 9441/ 3 f4,052.75 f4 ,052.75 201 9A1 42 9441/ 2 f4,05?.75 54,052.75 701 981 43 9441/ 1 f4, 05?.75 54,052.75 201 991 10 9441/ 74 f4,052.75 (4,052.75 201 991 11 9441/ 73 f4, 052.75 f4,052.75 201 C91 12 9441/ 27 f4,052.75 ;4,052.75 201 991 13 . 8441/ 21 ;4,0$2.75 f1,057.75 1051 571 4 9441/ 71 f3B,305.A0 f3A,305.80 TOTAI. f1, 728,512.00 ;1,778,512.00 Ea111B1T E aSSGSS?,II~~T DI:\CrP_~~I ALT:1 LO`LI.1 C'H_1\~EL ASSESS\IE\T DISTRICT B-I'-? tJ .... C Y ~( :. ~I! ~~~ ~ ~ L«. ~+ 1 ~ ~~, u~ I~~LT.' r IVl iii` -~ ~;~ I'i~ i I~ ~~~:.. ~.,_ _. - i K s;oic.z . et.-~-. ~ren ~. i. •ss<s . ~,a, z r w+u.s ~- LEGEND an.Yr( nisn.e S.Kni ___. ~~ +ur uwrcs ~ mwn (wwoK.Y -. wKKKt .ort ..o mms :n ..(sw ar :• - *1i...: ~s r. iWK W AKr Wr1 .Si~VO wP n( OM1 P[~.99 ['v[.YM. fYfigt v.r TKr uui SM MMIS ~ y' ~[r nKf it0.i I.Q MwR2 n.Ir'W.r rum ...wt. ~.Y-' NECIXiD Of nUN^ ( ~ ~ A_R w'M[ T~Q 7 S O v P M On p ~wgq'.~.'[rYpn:. ur a iAl, OrV QIAf V 1K On T ruY)V N[..nF. Kf.15(o M M Pr~Q Y M[ ?.f[A~[rE.nf 7 )rK[rt M 0.: Y !Nf 9~IIrwRP rrMwOiCUf~ninri. a'(.S Y. i~ .W iq K(. i•N.5 Kr~ '..( Ivrn[f i vil5'N(rl +~,to-Y'Ni r`~' 1 [~~j,ti$~2Y~v~ .i.~n4~t.0i~eurl,v .i0. .. .~inl un a,.. s ni cn a r..n~e cx•w(. ::°...: o~. o ... ~...: .r . ~i`. Kcwai r -w :..~. 1 .d. ......... s ..... 0nh ftCPO,[ Or 'Y :MM1 > Yn lin.RM 1 row cocutt Ncco:<Ne:~ I ,- ~~. ASSESSMENT DIAL ALTA LO MA C HAr ASSESSMENT DISTRIC ~ `% N Sq 101 xM yi p I ~y bi V3 to C n 11 1) p' 9 1 ~ an 1 L11 1• ~ y 1 xq b1 ux x m ~ ~ ° w zn xo ex ° m vi n I ~ q1 ax • • ~ 1r m ~ 1 i m au m ~ i • yi / m ~ i Ir1 n1 m m m m x m r ° •- a 1 to r • m ~ m T m m m zm n1 h ]I A f01 On • i I >D 1 I 11 xa _ m SCALE: - 1 "=400' ]M on m ~ ~ ~ xq en a i ~ I I Sm µ le ~ µ > x° ST m a au w w w u n m µ µ 11 1 °A a°a 10 1 ~. ~1 I ~ ]N 1 W ay ~ ~ µ u. .~ '•,i r I ~ m ~ ~ Na ° x01 aM aN aN x ° 1 ~ 901 SN dx p Sa 1 I I I ~ m1 n 1a Ia I :- iix '1 . 1 1° Sa nx ' I i NS ° 1° vx 1• I ' REFERENCE NJ7~ '' S3 ° i m 1 ";1 ~1 '„ THE LINES AN, 1 f; AIJD DETAILEC,' ' >;x ~ ui ~ ° 'z' ON FlLE AS Oy ~~ 9]I _ n mx So WI >1 • 101 xm sxx ~ v1 ° LLL vx i01 v y ° 1 Q I ! Y . ° urllQ w x1 Sm m vx au tl Q a ~ % sax nx m n 2 31 .. ~, .r 1 1 vx ~ !ff ii n Ki 4N Sl . .£ .."~ ~MENT DIAGRAM LOlVIA CHANNEL JNT DISTRICT 84--- ~ r9 ~P ~ p /,I'I~/= n ae i ~ i ~ ' i , , ~ I ~ m .u m w ua xu ~,. m yl a • W w z x zm w uz ~ zm m u uz yq SP m w m ux ux uz is pzF w a' zc xm ~, v ,a m u 4. uz m m ux ax m r y iox u v ixi m • w ,• m w a• zm m za z~z x w m, ~ i~ °'^ n m w m m n Uz ~ :p1 az xa is ix w a z za m zn z uz w • az a uz n m • tm n y m • m za •v ~ m Yz m m w uz xa xm x ° iu zm q3 ~ m 1e w T a •a •Si ~ ]N a •a ) • bS 10 U m 10 • •a •a ] •y a uz e 1 zm ° " m m m m m f01 rn m z • m • u to • e rn m ALL LOTS, PIECES, AND PARCELS SHOWN AND REFERENCED m m m u n m TO THE ASSESSORS MAP ARE W7THIN THE DISTRICT za m • a i~' v rn m m m •" ;. ._...... j '"' "' ~' m LEGEND • ; : . / i y •mi• •ma w w CENTER LINE EXISTING STREETS ~-------------------- ..~ . .; ~ n u y v .. . .. •''•~'~ ~''•''~~~ I "• . y -; - w ' PROJECT FACILITIES :•: ~.•:~ ' ] , ! i01 •' ~ ~ PROPERTY BOUNDARY - ; ,~, xq w • ... w•'~ •i DISTRICT BOUNDARY m ~ f M• • • c 'm as zm vz m '~ i - iz yz w m w m w ~• m REFERENCE NOTE AND SYMBOLS m m yz m " liz 7HE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF ANY PARCEL OF LAND, MAY, FOR A FULL ' wl AND DETAILED DESCRIPTION THEREOF BE FOUND IN THE ASSESSORS MAP ' ; ON FILE AS OF MARCH 20 7985 ; a' v a z~ ~, + ~ • m y] ¢. I n I r a ASSESSORS MAP ! ' a ~ ~; 201 ~^ ( _' 444 BOOK NUMBER 12~ ~_ HILLSIDE ROAD i ls, l I WILSON AVE w ~i >I a a~ ml x~ U! Q ;a REFERENCE NOTE AND S "' '~13 "J 'm" THE LINES AND DIMENSIS e l> 1° v x,~, AND DETAILED DESCRIPT. ' ~'i3 ~ xm ~uDK ~' ON FILE AS OF MARCH ' J 3 JJ3 Z ~~ vx n Jo >' :m 3b ~ as a~ vz °JS v: ~ a n eer>3Dx zn zm ~ N! ld GT Lx JJJ } Y]3 v3\ b v ¢ ~i ~I J x3 ~~yy ~1 ~. vz ia"x Sxi °x F WI v ~ _~ ____ __ :_________ss'___________ .t xa ~ ax. ,~ J ~. im rz za io ' r-'ss i ~. sz. 1 AI. ID '.~ .. is { ~.~ sse ~y s" ' 4~ 1-~" G' "' RECORD OF FILIf e° , ~,'r u ~, :° I ^~ I~% FILED IN THE OFFICE OF ss, "'= L d3 THIS DAY OF urFa+~°~r ~ CITY CLERK OF THE CIT ;: ', i-'~"'° I ~ "° ~ ~ RECORDED IN THE OFFIC + _ . -mi sz.F p'~ v. x. I - _ -.-I__-.._ THIS DAY OF '~' ' ~ ~-,Jxm--'_.; °~JMaErea on_-}f °"J H 9 SUPERINTENDANT OF ST ,~..' xal IS a. ~xm T-?- I ~~ ;' i 3 ]x. i,,, L>ol ', '~ THE CITY OF RANCHO C ~~ J ~ _ -_._.L-_..1-S.. L_.- i_ ~ _ -L-...__ ~ AN ASSESSMENT WAS I. -- ''----'----------~--- }~ D ...-----~----~~ - - ----- - ~ D xa ~~---'-"- AND PARCELS OF LAN l]x 1' i- :%a _.l (~_.__ .--__. ..--- WAS LEVIED ON THE 1° ~ ~.3~_ I i SJ DIAGRAM AND THE ASS of >3 I J I SUPERINTENDANT OF S~. ~1}~ .3 ~'xC 3 ~ ~ _ 3 ra J~J]~ --~ --I , 1985. REFERENCE IS M~ °' .+ ]__ OFFICE OF THE SUPERID e ,, '~~ n°i I I '~> EACH ASSESSMENT LEA ~„ -32n ,Jrz -'~ 1 ~ '`~~ ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 3J rz6 LJ ~.. _ °o: 'u ';; ~ „J CITY CLERK OF THE CI. 3. 35 D ~~.~. zol xm'- rs "' ':~ ° ._°~ `_ ~'._„~ FILED THIS DAY l.x l = s'~ IN BOOK OF MAPS z „'~"- ^ -- ,~ ~ ;;~ ~ ° COUNTY RECORDER, OF 'x? ~ xD °9 ~. ~ COUNTY RECORDER OF' _ I'° io' ~~ ii ovi xci xol zol 3e " e 'n xo vn vn Dn I + 10 p 1.] 3 1D 1.3 1]1 IS] °01 °°I °01 N MI 31 0 n1 el Del Del I Jv w u u u I uz ux i zz • I roe xm i iii lee m° vel iel I R- M N ]J 1 Mi ~~' ta] l15 'pl .pl 1 ££yy ~ l3 >~ MI ~' 1 Iet ]]I M 1 1ya ~'I , urz vex vel ' ~ xol l° ux xol n Im vei °°' f1 iei Je zol i '{~ ID xol vel I i° ~ e le] - ' v xm - ~ A m zn xol 3n I to vvl m nl I pv I u u I I I i i I ?.. CONNECT TO EXISTING ALTA LOMA BASIN 1 t: >a :a d] ;e] Ui w v] ]. sa de w. ~~ >f a. ¢~ o~ w~ x~ . ]~ i ;:: ~ ~ ,a re ~ ~I ~y a]v G ~ a: ee~ ,e ~ ~ ~ b ]OI L'e, ele ~ 9~ 1 le 1 ~] ~I rs , i!_ ; ~ o'~ .' ' -a' ~ e]e m m. ~1~1 _~1, io ' ;: ]e :a . .. o ' ^ ~ ~ nr - ' -. , ae] ar b 9 -' , I r',v ~ ~ ~_ _. r v.] I ._. l :m ~~ . -1 ,,~ I , ~ ,, ..{ '~ 9`I MCI lOr ID~ , am nr ai , „ I ,e , , a I om ]~ ,] ~~~ ], ,] I,G AIJA LOMA BASIN v REFERENCE NOTE AND SYMBOLS THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF ANY PARCEL OF LAND, MAY, FOR A FULL AND DETAILED DESCRIPTION THEREOF BE FOUND IN THE ASSESSORS MAP ON FILE AS OF MARCH 20 1985 ASSESSORS MAP 201 qqq BOOK NUMBER 12 PAGE NUMBER PARCEL NUMBER ^ RECORD OF FILING FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THIS DAY OF ,1985. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDANT OF STREETS THIS DAY OF ,1985. SUPERINTENDANT OF STREETS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AN ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE LO'~S, PiECE5, AND PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM, SAID ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIED ON THE DAY OF 1985. SAID ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WERE RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDANT OF STREETS OF SAID CITY ON THE DAY OF , 1985, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE ASSESSMENT ROLi. RECORDED IH THF. OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDANT OF STREETS FOR THE EXACT AMOUNT OF EACH ASSESSMENT LEVIED AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF LAND SHOWN ON Thi15 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA FILED THIS DAY OF 1985. AT THE HOUR OF O'CICCK .M. IN BOOK OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS IN THE OFFICE OF ThiE COUNTY RECORDER, OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORfJIA COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR COUNTY RECORDER EXHIBIT F NANCHO CUCAMr1N~iA AD 04-? F_XHIR'T F r'AGG + FXHIUIT "F" METHOD 4F ~PRGAD C'F ASSEF°MErJT The iav: req~.r,res ar.d ?he statutes provide th ~T assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of tnP "Muninr, pal Imp•ovcment Act of 1913," must be DasPd nn the benefit that the propPrtips receive from the works of improvemen*. The statute deer not sper~fy the mnthnd nr formula ?hat should by need ,n ary sppr:al assessment distn ct proceedings. Thp responsibility rests with !:. ASSeSSme^.t EnC~nPp~ ~.VM ,g •pta•ned for the pur:C rP making an onr~vsis of the ra!'ts ant dPte~mini n_~ them, -r:t aFFortinnment of +he assessment Obligat•nn. For these• prOCeed•ngc the Crty aas •pt2innd the eerv:<e of pnn swan 3 Associates, tn<. Exhibit "F" is attached sPrrinq fort F: crier expPr~en<e r.t the hFSP55rr:e n.t Eng,ne:•r. The Assessment Fng!neer then maKPS niA rec onmie m]arion a• the puhl~c hearing on the Asses e.rc:p nt D~stric'„ and iF: £:nal aUthOrity and action rpat8 with the Gity after heai~nu all testimony and evidence presented at that public near~n.]. UDOn the Conclusion of the public hearrng, the Crty mus? make the final erg on in determininq whether or nor top assn ;ement spread has Dean made in direct proportion to the Dene*~+s received. The method of assessment of the cnneiruction costs and the incidental costs of the Alta Loma Channel improvements has considered the new development potential which lies wl Urn the drainage area, including currently vacant lands. Adjustment to the base acreages as shown in the County Assessor's Maps was necessary in order to account for grove acreage to put all lands on the same basis, ad]ustment for pro)ect right-of-way was required for the program. Prefect costs were then spread among each parcel in accordan r,e with the ad lusted acreage of each parcel. Base Acr+age Per County Assessor Maps. The base acreage se shown nn the Cr :.in ty Assp=snr Maps was used and od n.+..in7 to the nParnst 1G0th of an acr?. Resulting acraanPS per cartel are set forth rn the table entrtiod "Ad7ustpd A u nape " Ad nistment th firers Acre age. Srnr.e the undeveloped land within thr bnnnfitcr! ^rCa is rn SOn+P Cat :: •`5 gro•.F land inrinr to street dedication' and in other corns was linivhed Its, equity of the pssessment required ad)ustment to an equal land base. A largo numbs' pf the I~+tn has Dr~en tlnvnloppd undnr development a~r~nm~nt agr~•ni nq to pay drainage tees bas•'d upon gionn arrP,iq •) and, tnprotero, gross ac cease wn, considrrrd thr. i!pst bops to be used ui the equation. All dPVnlannA Ir t^ lee rn pqu'i'pd io .tr o~:p acr,•;ion throunh the !^ie ei Jrn ndln~tnvmt factor o} 1. 1" timpu finish~•d let acr P~i(p••: RANCHO CUCAN~~Nr,A AD ?n-2 EXHIBIT r' PA ,E to equate with procs acre;.^e of the let. The t. 1S lector was developed by Pxam~ninq the narma! r:t reet dedir:atlon rPgUirement in ~;mpar~EOn t0 nnrmai IOt depth. IL W3°. determined that 15?< of the gross acreage was requl red for tled~catirn en the lot in tho ma !.o'Ity .,f dedication circurnstancee. The adlus tpient to gross acreage as shown in the thirtl column of the attached acreage ad iustment table. Ad)ustment fnr Profec; Right-of-Way. Since the Dreposed protect will table land (for rlgh!-or-way purposes) trnm several of the properties, the requrrPd right-of-way was laid out and aaiustment for I;.nd to he rerroaed from the '~=r ~~t future development on each affected DPrfPI. Th;s ad,~:: !mer,t fcr prc)ert right-of-way is shown nn the ac reagP ad;us?moot table. Spread of Asees srnen! Af r056 Adjusted Acreage. Us~n- the ad)usted anreage for assessment purposes as develoocd and ,_. forth in ihn acreage adfustment table, pro rest Coate were proDCr :Toned among the ad/usted acreages for each p ~cel within the bnnefited area. RANCHO Cl1CAAM)NC.A AD 84-2 EXHi91T F PAGc 3 RANCHO CUC7.MONGA AO 84-2 BENIFIT SPREAD BASED DN ADJUSTED ACREA GE 1728512.00 225.62 A-P-N ASSFSSCRS ADJ GROSS ADJUS TldFNT BOOK PAr,E PAR DIA. ACRES ACERAGF FOR R/W ADJ ACRES ASSESSMENT 201 71 S 0.68 1.000 0.000 O.6R s5,2n9,59 201 71 6 4.7E 1.000 0.000 4.76 f36,467. 12 201 71 25 12.14 1.000 3.620 6.52 (65,273.08 201 71 26 7.50 1.000 0.150 7.35 f56 ,309.52 201 71 35 6.2A 1.000 0.000 6.28 (48,112 .118 201 71 36 7.04 1.000 0.000 7,04 55',934.59 201 P3 46 11.99 1.000 0.000 11.99 (91,857 .:i0 201 A3 47 1.19 1.000 0.000 1.79 f9, 116.70 201 03 48 2.32 1.000 0.000 2.32 517,773.89 201 R3 49 1.99 1.000 0.000 1.99 f?5,245.71 201 132 16 0.,55 1.150 0.000 0.63 (4,845,68 201 132 17 0.52 1.150 0.000 O.fO S4 ,SA1.37 201 13<' 18 0.52 1.150 0.000 0.60 54.581.37 201 132 19 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.55 (4,228.96 201 132 20 0.49 1.150 0.000 O.SC, (4,317.06 2D1 132 2! 0.50 1.150 0.000 0.58 54,405.17 201 132 22 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 54,140.86 201 132 23 O.AI 1.150 0.000 0.54 54,140.86 201 132 24 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 (4,140.86 201 132 25 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 132 26 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 Sa,052.75 201 132 27 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,22R.96 201 142 17 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.7.5 201 142 1B 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 142 19 0.49 1,150 0.000 0.56 f4,317.06 201 142 20 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 142 ?1 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 142 22 0.4E 1.150 0.000 0,53 54,052.75 201 142 23 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,057.75 201 142 24 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.R6 201 142 2Ci 0.4E 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 142 26 0.4fi 1,150 0.000 0.53 f4 ,1157.75 201 142 ?7 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,057.75 201 14c 28 0.45 1.150 0.000 0.52 (3,964.(5 201 142 29 0.45 1.150 0.000 0.52 f3,96a.i~5 201 142 30 0,46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 152 1 0.41 1.150 0.000 0.47 f3,012.24 201 152 13 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4 ,1152.7 201 152 14 0,46 1.150 0,000 0.53 f4 ,1152.75 201 152 16 0.47 1. 1Ei0 0,000 0.54 f4,1Al1.i+6 201 152 17 0,47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,14U.111; 201 152 to O,4C+ 1. 15J o.non 0.53 (4,11!:; ,7S 201 1G2 10 0.4f 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,0~~2.75 201 152 70 O.4f, 1, 150 0.1'100 0.53 f4,1162.7:i flANCJ10 f.UC.AMONGA AO b4-2 EXIT 101 T F PAGE 4 A-P-N ASSESSORS ADJ GROSS AD.RISTMF.NT BOOK PAGE PAn DIA. ACRES ACEt1AGE FOP R/W ApJ ACRES ASSESSM1fENT 201 152 21 0.4P 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 752 2? 0.16 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 152 23 0.46 1.1.50 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 152 74 0.46 1.150 ~ 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 152 ?5 0.47 1 , 150 0,000 0.54 f4,140.P6 207 752 26 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,220.96 201 152 27 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 fA,052.75 201 163 17 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,062.75 201 163 to 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,06?, 75 201 763 19 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 173 1 0.50 1.150 0.000 O.SP (4,405.17 201 173 2 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.55 (4,2211.96 201 173 3 0.47 1,150 0.000 0.54 54,140.'$ 201 173 a 0.51 1.150 0.000 0.59 f4,493.27 201 173 5 0.5? 1.150 0.000 0.60 f4,5fl1. i7 201 173 6 0.52 1.150 0.000 0.60 f4,SP 1.?7 201 173 7 0.49 1.150 0.000 0.56 (4,317.06 201 173 8 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.Aci 201 173 9 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.66 201 173 10 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 173 11 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 173 12 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.55 (4,226.96 201 173 13 22.38 1.000 0.000 22.38 f171,456.75 201 422 1 O.B4 1.150 0.000 0.97 f7,400.RB 201 422 2 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 707 422 3 0.44 1.150 0.000 0.57 53,076..55 201 422 4 0.46 1.750 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 472 5 0.45 1.150 0.000 0.52 53,964.65 201 422 6 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.66 201 422 7 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 472 B 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 422 9 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 422 10 0.45 7.150 0 000 0.52 f3,964,65 201 422 11 0.51 1.750 0.000 0.59 (4,493.27 201 422 12 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.55 (4,228.96 201 422 13 0.46 1,150 0.000 0.53 f4 ,11 ,; .75 201 4?2 14 0.45 1.150 0.000 0.52 (3,964.65 201 422 75 0.50 7.150 0.000 O.SP f4,4U5, 17 201 422 16 0.55 1.150 0.000 0.63 f4,R45.6B 201 444 1 0.4P 1.150 0 000 0.55 f4,2?O.Q6 201 444 2 0.48 1.150 0.000 0..55 f4, 7.?B.9n 201 444 3 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.R6 201 4d4 4 0.47 7.150 0.000 0.54 f4,lnil.P6 201 444 5 0.47 1.150 0.000 0,54 f4,/411, r1R 201 444 6 0.47 1.150 0.000 O~SA fA, 140.116 201 444 7 0.4P 1. 1,F'0 o.Dno 0,55 f4,??P.!1 F, ?01 444 P 0.49 1. 15p 0.000 0,66 f4,317.Oh '107 444 9 0.49 7,150 0.000 O,SIi f4,317,UF ANCHO CUCAN.ONGA AO A4-2 EXHIBIT F PAGE S A-P•N ASSESSORS ADJ GROSS ADJUSTA!F NT ~CXIK PAGF. PAR DIA, ACFFS ACERAGF FOn R/W AOJ ACRES ASSE SSttirE N7 201 444 10 0-4A 1.150 0.000 0.55 ga,2. d.'~~ti 201 444 11 0.40 1.150 o.nnn 0.55 54,22A.~15 201 444 12 0.47 1.150 D,000 0.54 54,140.e`. 201 444 13 0.47 1,150 0.000 0.54 54, 1411.Ffi 201 444 14 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 54,140.5 201 444 15 0.47 1.150 0.000 0,54 f4,140.A6 201 452 1 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4 ,052.75 201 452 2 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 452 3 0.4fi 1,1,50 0.000 0.53 14,052.°E 201 452 4 0.46 1.150 O.p00 0.53 S4,n52,75 201 d52 5 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 E4 ,1152.75 201 452 F 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 54,140.!'8 201 452 7 0,4ft 1.150 0.000 0.55 g4,22A.9n 2n1 452 R 0.48 1.150 0,000 0.55 Sa,228.F~, 201 452 9 0.46 ~ 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.?5 201 452 10 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 452 11 0.46 1,150 0,000 0.53 54,052.75 201 452 12 0.4E 1.150 0.000 0,53 54,052,75 201 452 13 0.46 1,150 0.000 0.53 fa,052.75 201 452 14 0.46 1.150 O.OOn 0.53 54,052.75 201 452 15 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,22A.9b 201 452 16 0.4F 1.150 O.OnO 0.53 54,052.75 201 452 17 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 452 18 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 54,140.FF 201 452 19 0.47 1.150 O.OnO 0.54 54,140,06 201 d52 20 0.46 1.150 O.OOn 0.53 54,05?.75 201 462 21 0.65 1.150 0.000 0.75 (5,726.72 201 452 22 0.63 1.150 0.000 0.72 f5,550.51 201 452 23 0.46 1.150 0.000 0,53 (4,052.75 201 452 24 0.46 1.160 0,000 0.53 f4,052.15 201 452 25 0.52 1.150 0.000 0.60 (4,581.37 201 452 26 0.64 1,150 0.000 0.7A f5,638.Ft 201 452 27 0.52 1,150 0.000 0.60 f4,SP,1.37 201 452 2A 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 45? 29 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 452 30 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052,75 201 452 31 0.52 1.150 o.nnn O.FO S4 ,Sfl1.37 201 452 32 O.F3 1.150 0.000 0.72 15,550.57 201 452 33 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 54,22A.9fi 201 452 34 0.50 1.150 0.000 0.58 f4,4n5,t7 201 4A3 1 0.47 1.160 O.OOn 0.54 54,14n.P, f, 201 463 2 0.4A 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,22n .'tA 201 463 3 0,47 1.150 0.000 0,54 f4,/4n.AF 201 4F3 d 0,4F 1.150 0,000 0.53 SA,052.75 201 463 5 0.47 1. 16n 0,000 0.54 54, 14 n.t16 201 4F3 F 0,48 1.150 O.OOn 0.53 (4,052.75 201 4F3 7 0.46 1.150 O.lT I10 0,53 (4,052.75 201 4F3 8 0.47 1,1::0 0,000 0,54 SA,14O.it6 201 AF3 9 n.46 1.tsn 0.n00 O.Ci3 f4,n~.2.7; 201 4F3 10 0.47 1.160 0.11110 n,CiA fd, 140.01, RANCHO CUCAMI)NGA AD 04-2 EXHIBIT F PnGF 6 A-P-N ASSESS(1RS AD.1 GROSS ADJUSTh1FNT BOOK PAr_.E PAR OIA. ACRES ACERAGF FOR R/W ADJ ACRES ASSESS\!E tJi 201 463 11 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 fa,?7H.:afi 201 463 1? 1.00 1.150 0.000 1.15 fR,R 10.3? 2D1 463 13 O.R7 1.150 0.000 1,00 f7,6fi4.~c 201 463 14 0.7P 7.150 0.000 0.90 f6,672.On 201 463 1S 0.69 1.150 0.000 0.79 fF,,079.1? 201 463 16 1.98 1.150 0.000 2.28 (17,444.46 201 921 S 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.8 207 921 5 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.r.~ 201 921 7 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.P~. 201 921 8 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 1.4, 740.85 201 921 9 0.47 1,750 0.000 0.54 t4, 140.8E 201 921 10 0.47 , 1.750 0.000 0.54 54, 14 O.AE 201 971 11 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 44,14D.6F. 201 921 17 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 54, 140.(; 201 921 13 0.47 1.150 O.OOD 0.54 54,140,3n 201 921 14 0.47 7.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 7417. ;1E 2D1 921 15 0.47 1.750 0.000 0.54 f4, 14n.66 2p1 921 16 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.Ah' 201 921 17 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.,'-'.6 201 921 1R 0.47 1,150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.86 201 9?1 19 0.47 7.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.?6 207 921 20 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 740.86 201 921 21 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.86 201 921 22 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 (4.1411.88 201 921 23 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 54,140.86 201 921 24 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 (4,140.86 201 921 25 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.86 201 971 9 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 (4,228.96 201 971 10 0.49 1,150 0.000 0.56 fe,317.p6 201 971 11 0.49 1.150 0.000 0.56 (4,317.06 201 971 12 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 971 13 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 971 14 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.7E 201 971 15 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 971 16 0.47 1.150 o,onn 0.54 f4,140.AE 207 971 17 D.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, ttp,56 201 971 1R 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.^~.~ 201 971 19 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,n52.7` 201 971 20 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.r5 201 981 29 0.4P 7.150 0.000 0.55 f4,2^R .'1G 201 9P1 30 0.46 1.160 O.n00 0,53 14,052.75 201 981 31 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 (4,140.8( 207 901 32 0.47 1.750 0.000 0,54 f4, 140.86 201 981 33 0.48 1.150 o,nno 0.5.5 f4,220 .',1 r, 201 981 34 0.40 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,22it.~ii. 2111 9fl1 BS 0.49 1.1511 0.000 0.56 f4,317.iid 201 901 Jfi D.47 1. 15n D.n00 0,54 f4,140.rrt 201 9flt .i7 0,4f, 1.1;0 O.n00 0.53 f4,nS2.74 201 901 :10 0.47 1.7511 0.110 t1 O.SA ff 4,140.iu1 RANCHO CUCAl.10NGA AD P4-7 EXHIBIT F PAGE 7 A-P-N ASSESSOP,S ADJ GROSS ADJUSTMFtJT BOOK PAGE PAR DIA, AC P.FS ACERhGE FOR R/W ADJ ACRES ASSESSM C^JT 201 981 39 0.4E 1.150 0.000 0.53 (:,052 .75 201 961 40 0.46 1.150 O.Oll0 0.53 f4,C15: .i5 201 981 41 0.46 i. 150 0.000 0.53 f4,!152 .7J 201 981 42 0.46 1,150 0.000 0.53 (4,052 .75 201 961 43 0.4E 1•.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052 .i5 201 991 12 0.46 1.150 0.00 0 .53 201 997 10 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052 .75 201 991 11 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,057 .75 201 991 12 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.5'~ fa,U52 .'S 201 991 13 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052 .'S 1061 571 4 5.00 1.000 0.000 5.00 E3ft,305. a0 Rnr.u:no rucnmo,lcn no s4-2 ASSESSORS ADJ GROSS ADJUSTMENT TRACT LOT OIA, ACRES ACREAGE FOR R/W PtNI01T F PAGE B AOJ AfRFS ASSESSMENT 1004 ii 1 0.47 1.150 0.000 P 54 10046 2 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 7004E 3 0.4E 1.1$0 n.nnR 0.53 10 pJ6 4 0.4E 1.150 (7.000 0.5;9 10114E F 0.4E 1. 1fi0 n.ono 0.53 10046 F n.4F 1,150 O.OC10 0.63 1004E 7 0,4E 1.150 0,000 0.53 1004E A 0.46 1.150 0.1100 0.53 10046 9 0.4E 1.150 0.000 0.53 10046 10 0.47 1. 15U 0.000 0.53 10046 11 0.4E 1.150 0.000 11.53 10046 12 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 1004E 13 0,46 1.150 0.000 0.53 1004E 14 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 1004E 15 0.46 1.150 0.000 0..53 101?46 1F 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 1004E 17 0.46 1.150 0,000 0.53 1004E 1A 0.46 1.1$0 0.0(10 0.53 1004E 19 O.IF 1.150 0.000 0.53 10046 20 0.4A 1.150 0.000 0.55 1004E 27 0.47 1.150 0.000 O.Sa !0045 2? n_e7 1.150 0.000 0.54 in040 23 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 1004E 24 0.4A 1.150 0.000 0.55 100x6 2S 0,49 1.150 O.OL10 0,56 10045 2F 0.47 1.150 n.ono 0,54 t09nF ?7 0.47 1.150 n.n00 0.55 100x7 1 0.7? 1,150 0.000 0.63 1GJ47 7 n.a3 1. 15n n.OnO 0. ;7 100J~ 3 0 50 1 1Fp 0.000 0.`% t00n7 4 0,49 1.'150 O.I?00 0.56 1rn47 5 0.60 1,150 noon O.R9 mn4'! 6 n,4A 1.150 0,000 0.°.> 10047 7 0.50 1.150 O,OnO 0 5.7 1nOn7 A 0,47 1.150 o.nnn 0 54 100!7 9 0,4E 1.150 n.nno 0.54 10047 10 n. b7 1. 1F0 0.000 0.54 10047 it 0.47 1.150 O.OOn 0.54 1n!147 12 O.d7 1.150 CI. OnO 0,54 1004+ 13 0,47 1.150 n.0N1 n,5a 1110.17 t4 0.47 7. 15n il, OOn n.5`, 11104! 15 0.4R 1.150 0,0011 f1,4F 1011!7 1F 0.47 1, 15f1 n,1111 f1 1'1,54 10047 17 0.50 1.150 0.000 0,57 10 o.,J to 0.44 1. 1Sn O,j;l il'I O,Sp, 1004! 14 0. n'7 1.1v1 r1, rlnn n.67 1[104! II CI. 41i 1.150 n,000 O,F3 1004! i 1 0,4E 1.1511 U,11U i1 11,5'1 10047 21 I'1.4F 1. 15 CI i1, 1'11711 iI,S9 10047 23 0.50 1. 15n i1.Onn r1.57 RANCHO Cll r`AA41PICiA AD A4-2 EXHIBIT F PAGE 9 ASSESSORS ADJ GROSS ADJIIS iA1E NT TRACT LOT OIA. ACRES ACREAGE FOR R/W ADJ ACRES ASSFSSA~FNT 100x7 24 0.47 1.150 0.000 11 .54 t4,1h7.2~ 10047 25 0.4E 1.1511 0.0110 ll ,$3 f4 ,117A.18 10047 2F 0.47 1.1.50 O.O110 0 .54 f4,132 .OS 101147 27 0.47 1.150 0.000 11 ,54 (4,114.43 111047 2R 0,48 1. 15q q.0110 11 .55 f4,1R4 .'?1 10047 79 O.fi9 1.1511 0,01)0 O . All 56,105.5„ 10047 30 0.56 1.150 0.000 0 .64 f4,91F.17 10047 31 0.50 1.150 0.000 0 .57 (4,369.93 10047 32 0.50 1.150 0.000 0 .58 54,413.98 10047 33 0.51 1.150 0.000 O .SA f4,44'3,22 10047 34 O.SA 1.150 0.000 0 .66 S5,U65.94 10047 3S 0.58 1.150 0.(100 0 .67 55,127.61 10047 36 0.48 1.150 0,000 0 .55 f4, 184,131 10047 37 0.46 1.150 0.000 0 .53 (4,070.37 10047 3B O.4F 1.150 0.000 0 .53 54,070.37 10047 39 0.4E 1.150 0.000 0 .53 f4,070.3i 10047 40 0.47 1.150 0.000 0 .54 t4, 167.2 10047 41 0.50 1.150 0.000 0 .57 t4 ,361. 12 10047 42 0.51 1.150 0.000 0 .59 f4, 493.27 10047 43 0..53 1.150 0.000 0 .61 51,651.8 210.33 225.62 1726512.Ou FXHIpIT f, RAIJCIIO CUCi+64`6.,iA AD b4-7 F.%HIBIT G PAGE 1 EXHIBIT G LANGDCIN W. C1WEN University of California, Berkeley Registration: California Mr. P.ven has ever ,,~ v<?r^ n! experience in r:vil and sanitary enG~ne••r,^g, w,th pr ~.mary crop bmais on ~wa?er resources Systems Dlanning, design, develonment and manaoen:e nt. Ike has an oat ensivF bac¢ornund ~n the areas nt grnur ;+vater basin manacn~r,e •.t wastewater rer iamat~nn ~~?a:a•r• desalination, water quality management. coaGtel hprr~~~•s 'n prevent seawater In?rusion, water supply systems, eenrun; t~ve use programs, mayor water transfer tacilitles and water resources asseciateo recreational development. Additional areas of Mr. Coven's expertise Include rnuniripat financing agency repuirements and procedures, institutional relatinnehips, expert testimony, and econom~< ~_valuatiens. Specltic experiences related to your proposal ale Inciudetl a~ an Appendix. Don Owen & Asaoci ales, Inc. From 1973 to the present, Mr. Owen has workeA ae a consulting engineer. Hls primary are ae of Involvement Includ r. development o1 rP.apJrte9 management programs, Trom Inception to Implementation, for total, regional, State and Federal governmental agencies and entities in the private business sector. This activity IncluAes planning, assessment engineering, design, institutional relation ,hips and consulting on the. implementation of protects. Orange County Water Dlstrlct From 1965 to 1973, Mr. Oven served progressively as Dlstrlct Engler r,r, Assistant Mananor, and Secretary-Manager of the Dlstrlct, Hlrt re3ponslbl~ltles for the Dlstrlct, which pioncerad numerous new aoProaches in the held of water management, ranged from cu perviuion of all engineering progroms to overall management and adminletratlon of Uistriot atllVltlPa. Ids lnr pro lrctn devnlonrd under hie. direction rneludnd a c nrnhlnc,i 1;<.h,l ;ll wn•, tgwali•r rrclam.ttlon plant and $ A4 i!) Ae r.nllnntlnn r. lant to provide n w.rtnr •nq>ply 1nr ^ cwr,tai nnllnlty Int nit;ion beerier. Additional Dir..trirt prone ;,m ti Intlurlr rl a groundw,~trr ha~Iin n•;>laniuhnvnt program, b;vlin RAI!Gua taJ+:Ah'~GNi;A AU 64-2 E XIIIBIT r, pn r,E 2 operation studies. wastewater reclamation Inv wttipation, water supply quality manapemnnT prnnram, water rinhtp Iitlgation settlement, and water facility oriented rnrrnation programs. Mr. Ovren developed and coordinated a oroundwetnr user Dump tax and Correlative basin equity progrom d••sionod to equali.e costa between groundwater use and Imported waver supplies. He also negotiated soled waste dl.^•DO¢al contracts as part of hie duties for the District. State of California Department of Water Resources From 1954 to 1965, Idr. Uwen directed the Department's Sacramento-San Joaquin pelts Studies Section. In thi.^, czna- city, he was rPapnnaible for the planning and Imnlemen!atinn of a Delta water pro sect. As Chairman of the State-Feuerai Inter-Agency Delta Task Force, he directed the preparation of the multi-million dollar Delta Plan. Thi¢ included inplrt from 30 local, State and Federal apse r,l es which ha coordinated. Mr. liven also served on numerous committees and task forces consider rng problems associated with the San .loaquin Valley Drain; San Francisco Bay Area water programs; State Water Protect contract negotiations; legal and legislative matters; water quality and public information programs. Prior to the above, Mr. Owen was responsible for the study, planning and design o} alternative protects for the Uelta portion of the State Water Project. Alternative pro facts Investigated were salinity control barrier plans in the San Francisco Bay System, Cross-Delta Waterway Control Plans, and a Delta Peripheral Canal. Considerations involved were water quality, wastewater disposal, master levee systems, fish and wildlife, vehicular transportation routing, agri[ultural and Industrial water supply systems and recreational facilities. Activities included feasibility studies, economic evaluations, project formulation, design, recommended project selection, report preparation and frequent public meetings end speeches. APPENIDX A Talbert Barrier (Orange County Water District) Mr. Owen completed the conceptual design, and as Manager of the Orange County Water Oistr ict, supervised the constrl:ction n} the Talbert Barrier which is a seawater intrusion bar ricer conetructnd in Orange founty Involving 17 multi-point InJectlnn wells and fi extraction wells, The barrier system le Anslgnrd to create a groundwater mound and a humping trough to nntnbiinh a Zero qr adient ano control the intr union 01 oenan water Into the Urangc l'nunly Groundwater 8nnin. The barrier ur,nn, an a water nupply, tnritary ire.lt nd wn L•r. Thn PrnJect wan completed In 197? and han been in eonflmrous op r.r orlon since that date, RnNC;uo cucn:;,;;.an nD rTa-z EXRIp!T G PACs a Alamitos 9arripr (Orange County Water District-Los nngo lea County Flood Control D~stri<t) Mr. Owen served nn the Joint IAanagement r^ommittee and Dartieipaten rn the conceptual design of the Alamitos Oarrier Protect. This Protect is ~a combination of in iect~nn end eztrar.tion wells which control seawater int vision into the northern edge of the O:Togs County Groundwater basin and the Central Western Basins of Los Angeles County. The Project uses filtered Metropolitan Water District water as a water supply and was fonstruCted in i9F9 and has neon in continuous operation since that date. Santa Ana River Spreading Fa<illties (Orange County Water Disrrictl Mr. Owen, as Chief Engineer for the Orange County Water District, designed and supervised construction of 400 acres of spreading facilities on the Santa Ana River capable ,r percolating .n excess of 200,000 acre feet of water annu:~lly. These facilities constructed between 1953 and 1973 have neon in continuous operation. During the design and construction of these facilities, it was necessary to develop predictive methods of subsurface groundwater movements in order to protect the District from subsequent litigation. Roth hydrologic characteristics of the aqui ter and water quality changes were a necessary part of the predictive tool. Treated Wastewater Percolation Ponds !City of Corona) Mr. Owen developed the conceptual design and supervised the final design of wastewater percolation ponds for the City of Corona. These facilities were constructed 1 i97R and have been in continuous operation since that date. Northern Guam Lenae (Guam Government) Ae a subcontractor to CDM Engineers, Mr. Owen performed consulting services on the Northern Guam Leese which dealt largely with the interlace nt seawater and fresh water aquifer composed of coral shales on the northern halt of the island of Guam. These studios [ontrihuted to a change in the practice of groundwater evtra<tion on the Northern Leese. Sa/sty of future groundwater !:applies were determined by the Inter ace of salt and fresh water and the impact of extraction and/or subsurface inflow in that equilihrlum. The t acuities recommendod in the study are currently undrr cons( nictien. A1;ic ter Levy Systom Sacr mm~nto-San JoaGUin Delta IStatc o1 Califnrnint lip Uvnnn L1g3 nnA tgLO, Alr. (Turn nupnrvivcd the prepnr nllon of nnwciio cucnr;rl~.;n nD oa-z EXHIBIT ('i PAGE 4 conceptual plans for flood control and levy construction in Saeram?nto-San Joaa~.n n D?Ita. During ihi r. oerlod of time. the major component of Ipvy design Aealt with the hydr aul~< characteris<~cs of subeurf ace floods underlyi nq the h..^avy organic soils of the Delta. Organic solid have the characteristics of undergoing ext?nr.ive permeability cha.n„?s with only slight loadings. Unloaded organic materials may have a Derme ability ~n the range of course sand whelp slightly loaded organic materials have permeability In the range of concrete. The analysis of pore pressure and I?vy stahility during construction nn organic soils require an extensive research into the nature of ~n-situ soil m.,i store Changes while the soil mass underaoea loading condition,. Field tests of the research program were conducted betty>?n 1460 and 7963 and the levy stability nn the test Rertionv has been maintained s~ncr that tiro?. Thr overall mast?r levy system has nevor been implemented. Groundwater Management Plana (Varloue Clients) General groundwater management plans which Involve the conceptual design of spreading facil tries in the pretl~c[ion of groundwater movements have been completed for the 1o lfowing clients: Big Bear Munincipal Water Dletrlct City of Corona City of Santa Barbara Chino Basin Munincipal Water District Warren Basin/Yucca Valley The Irvine Company lands (70,000 acres) Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District RANCHO GUCAMON(iA AD A4-2 EXHIBIT r rngE q Additional exper,enu•s which involve predretlon of ground- water management are: CLIENT LOCATION PURPOSE 1. Allso Water Manage- SE Orange County Area-wide ment Agoncy Facilities Plan 2. Amen can Natrona) San Bernardino Wastewater D,snncal Rousing County 3. Appiw Valley C,.ounty San Bernardino Appraisal Water District County 4. Consolidated Rock Co . SE Orange County Court Case 5. Corp of Engineers Riversides Coun;y Recreational LA District Facilities 6. Daon Corporation Riversrde Coun?y Appraisal 7. EPA Region 9 Globe, Arizona Wastewater D~spn,al 6. Otis Heald Northern San Diego COUnty Caurt Cahn 9. Hi-Oesert County San Rernardino Groundwater Water District County Adjudication 10. IntrgTech (Italy) Poe River Valley Water Supply Study 11. Irvine Ranch Water Orange County Water Supply System District 12. City of Rialto San Bernardino Wastewater Disposal County 73. Rlveria General San Bernardino General Pian County )Beaumont) Amendment t~. Sunkist Growers Riverside County Appraisal (Corona) 15. State of Calliornia Nllea Cone Alameda Water Supply Study County i6. Vucalpa County Water San Bernardino Sewage Plant Pro)ect Dietrlct County RArlr.llo ru.Ar,!-,;a,A An u4-z EXII I B I T r. PAGE 6 MUrJICIPAI FIrJANC I;J;; IVARi~~l~5 CL IE;dTi) Mr. Owen hay art rd as F!nanr ;al Planner Asset=moor Enginnpr or F;nan<!al Ada~sor to the t..l~o-,a~ng: t. N ange County Water Gistrict rDistr!ct Financing ' 2. The Irvine Company (Mun!c!pal Flnanc~noi 3. Big Bear Munic!pal Water District (L nIP Acquic;tion) 4. B!g Bear M;m!r;pal Water D~str!rt (Assessment Enpinrt~~~ 5. El~lnore valley A1un~cioai 'Water Distrirt F. r~tY o1 Ranrno Cucamnnca 7. County of San Bernardino A. County of Santa Barbara 9. County of San D!ego 10. P.amonc Mun!c!pa! Warp. n;arrict 11. City ni Rialto 12. Sunkist 13. Moble Land Devolnpme rat Company 14. Taubman Corporation 16. Clty of Tnrr ante 16. AIISO Water Management Agency i7. Apple Valley County Water Agency 1'. Valley Center Munic~Dal Wa her Distr!ct~ 1'.+. Pomona Valipy Mun~ciDal Water D;etrrct i.. CiN ~ prt.„ ~~ ! t_\ t,cl ~c' rl TP. \\ L i .+ 1 ~,r I r ,. RANI^NO 1 CCAMrINnA AD 2,14-2 f XIliR1T r, r•t rr T FXPEf,T 'J/l It:[°.S (VARIOUS CLIENT S1 Mr. Owen has servetl as an evaert wetness antl adveeor In Iega! - actions ~r the /nllcw~na matterr: - 1. OCWD vs. Chino Santa Ana Fiver Ad)udica*~en ~. Delta Water right: hearing t5tatn Water nesnurces Control Boardl ~. ('ety ni flacent~a L:~nd ('r.ndemr,at,on 4. Otis Nna1d vc. lal Trans (Water right, appraesal+ `.. Summit Ranch Bankrunt~y 'lVar<r right;; a;+pr5~4al1 F. Warren Basin 6rounn Water Ad;uditatior: 7. Bin Bear Lak •+ Acquiset,on P.. Mallard Slouoh EI.°. Suit 9. City of Rialto Assessment District iD• City of Irvine vs. IRWD (One man one vote challenge) -- 11. Santa Vnez River Water Conaervetion District ID 1 EXt11Q1T H RAN(-H~J LUr. Atb )rJUA AD L:4-~ F.XH'p1T H RAr;F 1 E XH~P11 G RIGHT-r?F-'NAY CF.FTII=I(HTE STATF irF L:I iP~F 0.'.P Cdr."JTY C'•- SA'J prF"APDi'::r CITY GF RAIJI Hi.I CUCA64_NGA The undarsigncd. LLGVD 4ilnpg, hereby CERTIFIES UNDER FFNAI_TY OF PEiiJURY ?hat ?he fol~owing Is all ?n.Je and correc ;. Th:,t lher~ h;, r:. now boon •nstit•rtnd on]ceedrna•; ;coder •h„ P~nv~sions o! the "61uni<ical Im~~rovernnnt h:! e* 1513" ~nr; Orvis~on t: of ?he Streets a M H~nhwaye Code of ?h~ Std-,.. o Ca!~fornr a. f~~r ?hc cnnstri~ction ni cer?a~~n n~rbl~c ~mp•n.veme nts rn ~ ^n4cinr ~s sesames; drsirir, kno..n ,.,, dcirgr ~+nr1 3i ASSESSM'c NT DISTRICT NCr. 94-2 (AI-TA L4M11A FLOGD CDNTRCL CHP,NN F.L7 (hn_reinafter referred to a» the "Assessment Drstrrct"7. THE UNDERSIfiNcC SL:TES AND CERTlr=1ES AS FGLLGVS: (che :k unei ( ) a. That all easements, rights-of-way, or land necessary for the ac complrshment of the works of improvement for the above referenced Assessmont Distn r? have been oh rained »nd are in the possession of the Crty, b. Thet all easements, rights-of-way or land necessary for the accomplishment of the works of rmnrovnmen; for the aDOVe referenced Aseescment District have been obtained and are rn the possession of the Crty, except for those attached hereto, showing Ingal ` description and mans of rights-of-way and easements not yet obtarned at this time. It re further acknowledged that works of rmprnvement ae propnsod to De conefructeA wrthrn Bard Assessment Dir.?rr<t must De co ns;ructed wrthrn puDlrc rights-of-way, lane, or casements as owned by ^.oid Crty at the time of fire to nstructron of the worAS of improvnmont, and the underc,gned herehv further certit~ns tna+ all rights-ot-way neceusary for the works of rmprovcmnnt will he obtarned ^nd in the possession of the City prrnr to the commencement of any cnnstru<tron. E?',FCUTPi7 thi•, ~~ day of hehrudry, 1!1A5, at Rancho f.u urmorrgd, l"dlrfornia, LL O1'D IIURRS F.Af.C11U COI; A1.!'iN~iA AD G4-' FXII l y l 7 a rA!'.:: S I1Pf RIN'cNOth( pF 9TR4 _'S----~ C I Tv pF RAICf IIQ rur. a~!n;; ~.A STATE OF CALIFORNIA Harch 20, 1985 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNCA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER A mee [i ng of the Redevel opmev[ Agency of [he Ci [y of Rancho Cucamonga met on Nednasday, March 20, 1985 iv Che Liona Park Communi Cy Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cu csmovga. Chairman Jov D. Mikela called [he meeting to Order at 7:04 p.m. Pr anent were Agency Members: Pamela J. Ntigh t, Ch axles J. Buquet II, Richard M, Dahl, and Chairman Jov D. Mikela. Aleo present were: Eze cut ive Director, Lauren M. Wasserman; Legal Counsel, John Brwn; De pu[y Director, Jack Lam. Absent: Agency Membe ra Jeffrey Ring, who vaa working out of tow. x + + + + + 2. CONSENT CALENDAd No items submitted. + + + + x + 3. BTAPF &EPORTS 3A. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT KITE FOOTRILL PIRE PROTECTION DISTEICT PERTAINING TO (1) PRIORITIZATION OP E%PENDITDRES OP TAR ALLOCATION FDNDS. S[afF report by Lauren M. Wae aermeo, Eae cu[ive Director. MOTION: Moved 6y Dahl, seconded by Buquet to approve the amendment to the rov- tract vit6 the Paoth ill Pi re Distr i<[ vhic6 allws ue to change [he priority of [he expendi CUre of funds. Moci on carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). + + + + + + 30. REQUEST PROM P00TlIILL PINE PROTECTION DIRTRICT POR OSE OF TAR INCRF2fENT TO (2) FINANCE PIKE PROTECTION MASTER PLAN. Staff report by Lauren M. Nasee rman. The amount of the request ie approaimately 520,000 to complete the et udy. Chief Michael, Poothill Pi re Protection Die [rict, stated he did not feel [hey would go over the S20,000 figure. MOTION: Moved 6y Buquet, seconded by Wright to authorize Che $20,000 expendi- ture for a Fire Protection Master Plan study. Moti oa tarn ed 4-0-1 (Ring eb- aen[). + + + + x + 4. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Muved by Oe61, seconded by Buquet to adjourn the RDA meeting. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). The meeting edjovraed a[ 7:11 p.m. Respectfully submit tad, eev erly A. Authelet As aie[ent Secretary March 20, 1985 CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONCA CITY COONCIL MINOTES Rezu lar Mee[in¢ 1. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of [he City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga me[ on Wednesday, Merth Z0, 1985, in [he Li one Park Community Center, 9161 Be se Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeci ng vas called to order a[ 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mskele. Present were Councilmembers: Pamela J. Wright; Charles J. Buquet, II; Richard M. Dahl, and May oz Son D. Nikels. Also present were: City Nanege r, Lauren M. Naeaerman; City Clerk, Beverly A. Mthele[; City Attorney, James Markman; As eistant to the City Hanage r, Robert Rizzo; Administrative Malyet, Mark Lorimer; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Hick Gomez; Senior Planner, O[[o Rroutil; As eiatent Planner, Lisa Winniger; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubba; Finance Di tact oz, Harry Empey; Community Services Director, Bill Holley; and Communi [y Services Coordi- nator, Mary Whitney. Absent: Ccuncilman Jeffrey Ring, who was out of two on business x x x x x x x 2. ANNOONCENENTS/PRESENTATIONS 2A. Thure day, Me rth 21, 1985, 7:30 p.m. - PARR DEVELOPMENT COMMIS SIGN, Lions Park Communi [y Center. 2B. Wednesday, March 27, 1985, 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION, Li one Park Com- munity Center. 2C, Thursday, March 28, 1985, 7:30 p. m, - ADVISORY COMMISSION, Library Confer- ence Roam. 2D. Presents ti on of City Plaque [o Robert Dougherty for ouCStanding service ae City Attorney. 2E. Presentation of City Plaque to Eduard Hope on for ou[etanding service ae As- aiatant City Attorney. 2F. Mayor Mi ke le introduced the nev city attorney, James Merlman, who in turn introduced hie staff: Mdy Arch incz yeki, Ralph Ranson, and Craig Fox. 2G. Mr. Waese rman requested Chat Consent Calendar item 3R be removed from the ConeenC Calendar. Councilwoman Wright requested [ha[ item 3P be remw ed for dia cue ai on. Mayor Mikele requested item 3V be removed for diecuesi on. Coun- cilman Dahl requested item 35 be removed for die cueaion. City Attorney re- quested item 3L be removed for diecuesi oo. x x x x x x 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 3A. Apprw al of Nerrente, Register No's. 85-03-20 sad Payroll ending 03/03/85 for the total emounc of $428,473.54. 38. Alcoholic Beverage Applica [i on No. AB 85-03 Eor Off-Sale Beer d Wine Ee Ci ng (1) Place License, Joel A. Sterrett, 10110 Foothill Boulevard. City Council Ninu[ea March 20, 1985 Page 2 (2) 3C. Forvard Claim CCL 85-09) against [he Ci [y by Richard Dean Ya tee, failure of City Co inform claimant of regulations concerning running a business au[ of his home, December 15, 1981. 3D. Appr wal of Parcel M.ap 8063, Bond, Agreement and Real Property Improvement Cootract and Lien Agreement, loce[ed at the southea e[ Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Levis Dev el opmen[ Company. (3) RB.SOLDSION N0. 85-73 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COORCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO COCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP N0. 8063, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 8063), IMPROVEMENT AGAEEMENT AND IMPROVEMEAT SECORITY (4) REB OLi1TI0N N0. 85-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORHIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY INPROVENEIIT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREECENT FROM LEN IS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR PARCEL MAP 8063 AND AUTlIORI2ING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEAR TO SIGN TAE SAME 2E. Appr wal of Parcel Map 8828, Bond and Agreement, located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue between A: row Ai ghway and Ninth Street, submitted by Barmakian Company. (5) RESOLUTION N0. 85-]5 (G) A RESOLUTION OF TAE CITY CODNCIL OP TAE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 8828, IMPROVE- MENT AGREEMENT AHD IMPROVEMENT SECORITY (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 8828) 2P. Ito rt.wed for diatmuioo by Comcikmoman oright. Approval of Parcel Hap 9079 and Real Property Imprwemen[ Contract cud Lien Agreement, located at the nor theaet corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Aveoue, submitted by Sycamore Inv eatmenta. (7~ RESOLUTION N0. 85-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODNCIL OF TAE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROV IAC PARCEL NAP 9079 (TEHTATIVE PARCEL NAP 9079) (8) RESOLUTION N0. 85-77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AREAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEM AGREEMENT PROM SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS, POR PARCEL MAP 9079 AND AUTAORI2ING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEBR TO SIGN THE SAME 3G. Appr wal of Tract No. 10035, Security and Agreement, located oo the south and ease side of Red Aill Country Club Drive, south of Calls Coraz on, subm i[[ed by Rancho Ae eociatea, Ltd. (9) RESOLUTION N0. 85-78 (10) A RE80LOTION OF THE CITY COURC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEHENT AGREEMENT, IM- PROVEMENT BECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 10035 City Council Minutes March Z0, 1985 Page 3 3H. Approval of Aonde, Agreement and Final Hap of Tract 11893, located on the eou[h aide of Banyan, west of Sapphire, submitted by Plaza Aui lde rs, Inc. RESOLUTION N0. 85-79 (11) (12) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SHPROVPAENT AG REEHENT, IM- PROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OP TRACT 11893 3I. Approval of Tract No. 12772-1, Bonds and Agreement, located on Che was: side of Turner Avenue at Pa LO Al [o Street, submitted by Morris d Searlee. RESOLUTION N0. 85-80 (13) (1.4) A RESOLPfTON OF THE CITY CODNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IM- PROVEI~NT SECORITY AND FINAL MAP OP TRACT N0. 12772-1 3J, Appr wal of Tract No. 12801-1, Honds and Agreement, located on the south aide of Banyan Street, east of Carnelian Street, submitted by the Deer Creek Company RES OLOTION N0. 85-81 (i5) (15) A RES OLOTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP T8E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IM- PROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 12801-1 3R. Release of Bonds: Tract 9638 - Located aoz [h of Lemon, weet of Archibald; owner Cri emar -e- (17) velopment Corporation. Maintenance Guarantee Bood $8,450.00 3L. Items revved for dimcauion 67 [he City Attorney. Appr wal of a Pipeline (18) L ice nee be cveen the Atchison, Topeka and Sance Pe Railway Company and the City (L9) in connection with Tract 11606-1, located east of Raven Avenue be cveen 8aee Line Roed and 19th Street and also the apprwel of an agreement be cveen the developer, Barclays-Tac and the CiCy. (CO 85-26 S 27) RESOLUTION N0. 85-82 A RESOLUTION OF TBE CITY COUNCIL OP TAE CITY OP RANCHO COCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PIPELINE LICENSE BETNEEN THE CITY AND THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND EANTA PE RAILNAY POR THE INSTALLATION OF A STORM DAAIA PIPE BENEATH THE RAILROAD TRACKS 3M. Apprwel of Agreement with James L. Markman Lev Office (CO 85-28) for legal (20) services. 3N. Approval of Fi rat Amendment to Agreement for cooperation be [wean the Foal- ('21) hilt Pi re Pracection Diet ric[, the Redevelopment Ageneq of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RA 82-03) 30. Approval of award of contract far the Amethyst Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (22) to the lowesc, reeponeib le bidder, Cedric C. Elias Paving Cont ractora of Yomona, California, (CO 85-29) at the amount of $29,741.88 plus lOX contingencies. The total amount not to exceed $32,715.26. Ci [y Council Minutes March 20, 1985 Rage 4 (23) 3P. Approval of Street Frontage Construction Reimbursement Agreement between Robert A. and Shirley A. Lees and the Ci [y of Rancho Cucamonga. The agreement allows for reimbursement to be made [o [he City for the conetru coon of street frontage impr ov emente at 10213 Baee Line Aoad. This agreement includes a Grans of Ea semen[ for Roadway and Related Purposes for the ultimate widening of Beae Line. RESOLUTION N0. 85-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING STREET FRONTAGE CONSTRUC- TION REIMBORSIIdENT AGREEMENT BETNEEN ROBERT A. AND SRIRLEY A, LEES AND THE CITY OP RANCRO CDCAMONGA (24) 3Q. Approval of Street Frontage Construction Reimbursement Agreement between Dolores Brwne and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for reimbur semente [o be made by Ma. Brwne [o the City for street improv emente to be built along Base Line Road west of Ivy Lane. The agr eemenC also Hr ants to [he Ci [y an Ea Bement far Roadway Purposes along Baee Line Road and Ivy Lane. Such Graet of Easement is intended co al low for the ultimate widening of these eCreete. RESOLUTION N0. 85-84 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING STREET PRONTAGE CONSTAOC- TION REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN DOLORES BROViNE AND THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONCA (25) 3R. Approval of Joint Construction Agreement for Stree[e and Severline Con- struction on Archibald Avenue between Cucamonga County Water Di strict and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION N0. 85-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A JOINT CONSTRUCTION AGREE- MENT FOR STREETS AND SEWERLINE CONSTRUCTION BETNEEN THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONCA AND CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (26) 35. Itet• reamed for diacmuiom b~ Co®ci ltea Dahl. Appr mal of the final ex- penditure of $100,447.95 for the Rel loran Avenue from 6th Street to 656 feet north Re cone[ruc[ion Project, accept the improvements ae complete and authorize the Finance Director to make Che appropriate transfer of addi [i onal funds from Gae Tax or Syeteme Development revenue source. (27) 3T. Approval of Concract Change Order No. 1 for Engine Bring De ei go Services on the Baee Line Road Imprm emente from Teak Way to Haven Avenue. Derbish, Guerra d As sociatea (CO 83-79). (28) 3U. Approval of Exteoei on [o Rinds rears for Agreement fot In e[ellati on of Drai nags Fa cili[iee. (CO 85-30) (29) 3V. Approval of au th orizatioo expenditure of 570,000.00 from General Fund Bud- getad Contingency for purchase of telephone system from ITT Business Communica- tions Corporation. 3W. Set public hearing for April 17, 1985, for Intent to Annea Tract Nos. 12362, 12621, 12091, 11781, 11625, 12525, 12740, 12741 and 12772-1 ao Annexa- tion No. 9 to Street Lighting Maintenance Die[ric[ No, 1 and Tract Noe, 12621, 12772-1, 12525, 12739, 12740 and 1274' ao Annexation No. 7 [o Street Ligh ti ag Maintenance District No. 2. City Council Minutes March 20, 1985 Page 5 RESOLUTION N0. 85-86 (30) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OR RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGI- NEER'S REPORT FOA ANNERATION N0. 9 TO STREET LIG NTTNG MAIN- TENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RESOLUTION N0. 85'87 i71) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODNC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNERATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSEH SMENT DISTR LCT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXA- TION N0. 9 TO STREET LIGRTING MAINTENANCE DIS TRLCT N0. 1; PURSUANT 1V THE LANDSCAPTNG AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OF- FERING A TINE AND PLACE FOR HEAR INC OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION N0. 85-88 i3-') A RES OLDTION OF TflE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, OF PREL SNINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGI- NEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO STREET LIGRTING MAIN- TENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 AESOLUTION N0, 85-89 (~}) A RES OLDTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STRERT LIGHTING NA INTFAANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN AS SES Sf4ENT DIB TR ICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNERA- TION N0. 7 TO STREET LIGRTING RAIN TENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LANDECAPING AND LICRTTNG ACT OF 1972 AND OF- FERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR REARING OBJECTIONS TRERETO 3R, Se[ public hearing for April 17, 1985, foz In tea[ to Aanea Tract Nob. 12525, 12539, 12540, 12541, 11781, 12772-1, 12621, 11625, 12362 and 9539 to Londe ca pe Maintenance Dis[ritt No. 1 ae Anneza tion No. 22. RESOLUTION NO, 85-90 (3`') A RESOL OTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIA, OF PREL ININARY APPROVAL OP CITY ENGI- NEER'S REPORT FOR ANNERATION N0. 22 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RESOLOTION N0. 85^91 (3>) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL OF TBE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIPORN IA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. I, AN AS- SESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNERA- TION NO, 22 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIB TRICT N0. 1; PORSO- ANT TG THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGRTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR REARING OBJECTIONS THERETO MOTION: Moved by Nzight, seconded by Dahl to appr we the Consent Calendar vi[h i tame "F", 'T.", "R", "S", and "Vs rem wed. Mo[icn carried 4-0-1 (King ab- sent). •+~:+ D iecuseion of Item 3F: Appr wal o£ Parcel Map 9079 and Real Prop¢r[y Improve- ment Contract and Lien Agreement, located at [he northeast corner of Baee Line Rosd and Archibald Avenue, eubm fitted by Sycamore I¢veetmenta. Goan ci lvomao Nzight ata [ed she pulled [he item in order to vote "mo". MOTION: Moved by euquet, ee conded by Dahl to approve item 3F. Mo [i on carried 3-1-1 (Nright - na; Ring - absent). City Council Minutes March 20, 1985 Page 6 RESOLUTION N0. BS-76 A NES OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 9079 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 9079) RESOLUTION N0. 85-77 A RESOLUTION OF 'fHE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT PROM SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS, FOR PARCEL MAP 9079 AND AUTHORIZING THE NAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME Diacuseioc of Item 3L: Appr oval of a Pipeline License between the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Axilway Company and the Ci [y in connection with Tr art 11606-1, loco [ed east of Raven Avenue be tweet/ Base Line Road and 19th Street and also [he approval of an agreement be tweet/ the developer, Barclays-Tac and the Ci [y. Item removed by Ci [y Attorney. The City At [orney recommended chat Paragraph 6 be amended with new indemnification provisions as follows: "Developer agrees to indemnify Ci[y and Ci[y'e elecced officials, officers, agents and empl oyeea from any and all costa, expenses, claims, liabilities, actions and causes of action, and all court costs a¢d actorneys' fees related th ereco, for injury co or death of persons (including, but no[ limited to, passengers and employees of Railroad and empl oyeea of City), and damage to or loea of property (including, but no[ limited to, pr ope rcy owned, leased, occupied or used 6y or in the ca ee, custody or control of Railroad or the employees of Railroad or Ci [y or the employees of City), hwever [he same may be caused, resulting from, arising out of or in any way connected with [his Agreement oz the conetruc[i on of the aforesaid project to the maximum extent pe twitted by law." NOTION: Noved by Dahl, seconded by Wright to approve ae emended by City Attor- ney. Carried 4-0-1 (Ring abe ant). RESOLUTION N0. 85-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OP RANCAO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PIPELINE LICENSE BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE ATCBISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY FOR THE IN BTALLATION OF A STORM DRAIN PIPE BENEATA TAE RAILROAD TRACKS • tx+• Discueaicn of Icem 3S: Appr oval of the final expenditure of $100,447.95 for [he Hellman .anus from 6th S[ree[ to 656 feet north RecOne[ruct ion Project, accept the impr ovemen[a ae complete and authorize the Finance Director to make [he eppropr late Cron of er of additional funds from Gas Tax or Syeteme Develop- ment revenue source. Councilman Dahl inquired info [he statue of the area along Hellman. Mr. Wae se rman ata red staff will check this, and put a note in his box. Usually [here ie a have layer and then a finished layer. This particular project in- volved more work than Ch ey or iginelly avticipa red because of [he er oa ion caused by water over [he years. The auh-ba ee had to be pulled out and replaced. The extra coat was for .`.at reason. MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Wright to approve the expenditure of $100,447.95 for the Nellman Avenue Re cone [ruction project and accept the im- provements. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). •+~x: Diecueaion of Item 3V: Approval of authorization expenditure of $70,000,00 from General Fund Budge cad Co n[i nge ^cy for purchase of teleph ens system from ITT Bus ins ee Communica [ions Corporation. Mayor Mikele asked what Chia vas. City Council Minutes March 20, 1985 Page 7 Mr. waeee zme¢ pointed out [he[ Council had originally appr wed [hie some time a8o. Origival ly a lea ee/purchase had been appr wed which would have coat $30,000 i¢ costa. we have decided [o proceed with an outright purchase. MOTION: Moved by Mi kale, ae conded by Buq ue[ to appr we [he $70,000 expenditure for purchase of a telephone system from ITT Business Communica ti one Corpora- tion. Motion ce cried 4-0-1 (King absent). + + + + x + 4, ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 4A. ADOPTION OF 1982 UNIFORM HECEANICAL CODE - This adop[i on will enact [he (7f) l sleet avatlable edi [i on of the nationally recognized Uniform Me chani tal Code and fulfill Stale mandate For its adoption. Item continued from March 6, 1985 meeti vg, Staff report by Jerry Grant, Building Official. Mr. Grant recommended [hat because of acme inadequacies in adverb sing a¢d de- scription within the ordinance, it was et aff's recommends [i on to start all war again, Mayor Hikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, [he public hearing was closed, ORDINANCE N0. 252 (aecovd reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY OP RANCEIO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, ADOPTING TIIE ]982 EDITION OF TEE UNIFORM MECEIAN ICAL CODE ACTION: Council concurred [o continue tv a date when [his is ready + + + + + + 40. ADOPTION OF 1982 UNIFORM HOGS ING CODE - Thie adoption rill enact the latest (~~) available edi ti ov of the na ei ovally recognized Uniform Housing Code and fulfill Sta [e me¢da [e for i[e adoptioa. Staff report by Jerry Grant, Building Offi- cial. Mr. Grant ate tad that the same thing applies to this Ordinance. Mayor Mike le opened [he meeting fot public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing rae cl oaed. ORDINANCE N0. 254 (Fire[ reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCflO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 1982 EOI TION OP TEE UNI- FORH EODS ING CODE ACTION: Council concurred Go continue Chia [o a future date whe¢ its ready. • + + + ~ x 4C. ENVIRONMENTAL AS5ES SMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85-OlA RICHARDS - A (3N) request to emend the General Plao Lend Uae Map from Lor De nei ty Reeidenti al [o Industrial Park for 2,5 scree of lend located on [he southeast corner of Archi- bald sod Meio - APN 209-062-01, aad 02. Staff report 6y Liea Ninniger, Aseie- [ent Pl sons r. Ne. Ninniger stated she had received ane letter in oppo ei [i on to this project. City Council Minutes March 20, 1985 Page 8 Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Ad dreg sing Council were: Dan Richards, repre ee n[i¢g Mr. 6 Hrs. Don Harris, owners of Custom Allay. They are in eecrw which is ready Co cl see with Don Oren of Oven Electric. Originally [heir req use[ roe for just the Custom A11 oy site, but [he Plan- ning staff suggested a larger ar ee, and he ranted [o make sure that it roe clear that the only area approved by the Planing Commission roe the area of [he tvo parce le. The area to the myth vas decided not appropriate. They concurred with Chia de ciai on. Mildred Fea>~s, poet Or of Mount Zion Four Square Church, asked if this could have any[hi¢g [o do with their property. Otto Arout il, Senior Planner, re- spo¢ded thxt th ie pr of act naa no relati o¢ehip Co [he Church's property. Nacho Craci a, 10364 Rumbol t, had ¢o problem with Mr. Owen going into [he corner. They rare concerned [hat [he area rae being enlarged to take in the seat of [he empty field. Whnt really concerned them was that another City Council mighc look a[ this and say i[ makes se nee to go acr osa the street tc the ¢orth. Orlea Ar iae, 9858 Main Street, eapreesed that Chey had not been notified of this heerivg. Those who did get the notice, it came too late. The people were concerned about the area to the north and how it would affect [hem. Dan Richards stated that the requested use for the area wan for [he leas[ intensive industrial zoning Cha[ [he Ci[y had which was an indus[ri al park. The current use ie a non-conforming use for that zoning. There is a forge i^ there nw, but [hat will be leaving. The bus ivees going in wiil not be one which will create pol lotion or noise impaction. Mr. Oven realizes and has so eta tad to [he Plavni ng Commis ei on, [he requirements necessary to improve [he property Co City standards. Don Orena stated [ha[ Hr. Ramie had a problem because he would have to lease th ie out as foundry. It will Gave Co be a fouvdry or a bueine ee like his. There being no Eurther public response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Authelet reed the title of Resolution No. 85-92. RESOLUTION N0. 85-92 A RESOLUTION OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF RANGTIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AID:NDING TBE ADOPTED LAND USE ELEMENT OF TAE RANCHO CUCANONGA GENERAL PLAN MOTION: Moved by Buque [, ee conded by Dahl to appr we Reaoluti on No. 85-92 end [o waive full reading. Mo[i on carried 4--0-1 (Ring abaev[). Councilman Dahl felt Chia vas the beet use for the site and neighborhood. x x x x x x (39) 4D. COlD1UNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCR GRANT APPLICATIONB FOR PI SCAL YEAR 1985-86 - The Council will tev iev the preliminary eta Cement of commuviCy abj actives and select for funding those pr of acts moat needed in the Caa®uni cy. Staff report by Otto Rrou[il, Senior Planner. Mayor Mi ke le opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Nacho Gracie stated he had met with the Water Department - there is en area on Hembol dt from the Creek Co Turner that doesn't have any sewer line e. Pe chaps et a later dace we could look at Chia for future Block Grant fund- ing. City fours cil Minutes March 20, 1985 Page 9 Tony 2enz, representing Ra thy Harkey, Pr aside of of Che Alumni AB eoci anon of Chaffey Nigh School Oiatriet, emphasized the need for improvements to [he Gardner Spring Auditorium and encouraged consideration of Fonda [o as- sist them. Jim Frost encouraged support for [he Chaffey Carcia Roue e. Robert Nebbs, Report Developer for Rolling S[ar [, requested support. Sondra Svai ne req ueated help for [he lw income. There being no further public response, Nay or Nikels cl Deed [he public hearing. City Clerk Au Chalet read [he title of Resolution No. 85-93. RESOLOTION N0. 85-93 A RESOLUTION OP TtlE CITY COONCIL OF TAE CITY OF RANCtlO CUCAMONCA, CALIPORN IA, ADOPTING PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COlOR:NITY OBJECTIVES ANO SELECT It1G PROJECTS POR PRELIMINARY FUNDING MOTION: Mw ed by Buquet, ae conded by Wright to designate the follw ing projects for Community Development Block Groot funding: Houeiog Rehabilitation North Twn Park North Twn Street with direction to staff to inn eetiga [e funding (approximately 55,000) for hand- icapped signs. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Ring abeent). xxxxx Mayor Mi ke la called a race es a[ 9:20 p.m. The meeting reconvened a[ 9:40 p.m. vich all members of Council present, but Councilman Ring. xxxxx x x x x x x 4E. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 - ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS. Staff re- port by Lloyd tlubba, Ct[y Engineer. Ma cRe nz ie Br wo vent war the procedure for the ev evi ng. Mr. Hubby elated only one written pr o[e s[ had been received from Mr. F. Biene, which zepr eeen[s 2.44 percent of [he acreage. May ar Mikel. opened [he mee[i ng for public hearing fer [hose who had Eiled a vri tten protest ago inet [he proceedings. Addres ei ng Council were: Jeanne Tibbs tte, daughter of Hr. Biene. Mr. Biene vas usable [o come to the meeting since he vas out of two, She eta led [hey agreed with the Ci ty'e intxnt to improve [he flood control channel. They felt, hwever, that the selection of their property vas unfair because they were arbitrarily selected far incl uai on in the District rather then include all [he [ax payers within [he va ter shed. Me. Tibbs tte eta led Chet there Mere two areas to din case - parcels 2, 3, and 4 which are the lover parts le. She requested that the lover pe rte la 6e remw ed from [he di et rict. Md, Parcel No. 1 which is in escrow. If Chia doesn't go through, then Mr. Bi eve will keep the property far farming City Council Minutes Na rch 20, 1985 Page 10 Hayor Mikels asked for those why wished to ape ak against [he impr weme¢[s, [he District, or [he mach od of the spread. Addressing Council vas: Vic Cherbak, 9820 Cinch Ring Lene, AI [a Loma. Stated [he reason for [he impr w emenc will cake care of excees flood waters [ha[ have been created by a development. Therefore, that property under Bev el opmen[, eh ould be in- cluded in this District. The three lots we are Calking about along Wilson, he did not feel i[ was Council's intent to hasten [he demise of agricultur- al land. This is no[ vacant property -- it is an agricultural producing property. All of [he other Bevel opmente are spread over the homewnere of Che subd ivisione, but [he three parcels are not -- Council ie creating a har ship for a farmer. Mr. Cherbak felt it was unfair chat Council increase the fees for a few developers who have come From outside [he City [o develop property, avd then charge Che fees to the homewners without regard to the ocher poten- tial Bev elopmen[e that are going to contribute to the flood waters in [he Channel. He augge aced that avy other Bev el opmevte which contributed to [he flood waters in Che Chavnel be charged the fee for [his. Mayor Mikels opened [he meeting For those who were in favor of [he Dis [r ict. Addressing Council were: Blare Frandsen, 3366 Halstead Avenue spoke i¢ favor of [he district. Mayor Mikels asked what vas [he percentage of fival pr oteete. Mawer: includ- ing [he three lots, 3.25. MOTION: Moved by Wright, se canded by Dahl Co cl wee the publ it hearing. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). MOTION: Mwed by Suque[ [o amend the asses ement on Parcel No. 3 (which is Tax Code 201-8348) reducing to zero in as much ae the panel does no[ receive aoy special a¢d direct beveEi[ from [he works of imprwemen[. Motion failed for lack of a second. Councilmen Dahl felt that Parcels Z, 3, avd 4 could be developed at a[ later time. Mr. Cherback stated [ha[ Pe rce is 2 amd 3 has grape vines which support the wi¢ery, Parcel 4 has Che grapefruit gr we. Parcel 2 consists mf 1.3 acres. Councilman Dahl felt that Pa rce le 2 end 3 eh ould be remw ed from [he Aeeeeemeni District. He felt th ie would be a good compromise. Councilmen Buque[ felt [hat the fair th i¢g would be [o exempt Parcel 3 where the rea idevtial core was, and o¢ parrs le 2 and 4 prw ids a loan prw ision where Che City will put in the dol lace nw and that money become due and payable et some time in the future rhea it ie developed. Don Oren, consul [en[, ata tad we had arranged a hardship clause which stated in a case of an acceptable hardship the City would pick up the payments as a loan ae they occurred against that lien, up the a maximum of 15 years. A[ the end of 15 years, the Ci [y will atop charging interest, but still set the full amount payable as the amount due at the end of [he 15 year period or whenever Bev el opmenc occurred, Mayor Mikels asked Mre. Ti bbi tta if she concurred with this plan. She asked what the in ter es[ rate waa. Larry Rollapp stated i[ vauld be 9.50. Mr. Ti bbe [te asked if the loan would be on Pa rcele Z and 4 with Parcel 3 exempted. Mayor Hikels eta [ed Chet vaa correct. Me. Tibbi tte stated she concurred with Chia plan. MOTION: Moved by Buq ue t, ee conded by Wright to exempt Pa r<el 3 from the Ae- seeament Dis[zi c[ with [he loan prw iai on se[ in place for Pa rce la 2 and 4. Mo [i on carried 4-0-1 (King absent). City Council Minutes March 20, 1985 Pagc 11 MacKenzie Brown went over the action just to make sure everyone understood. WheC has been done is to eliminate Parcel 3 from the As ae ssment District. Pa rce le 2 and 4 to remain in the As aeeament District. Upon the proper applice- tion~ an agreement of a loan program can be ini[i ated. MacKenzie Brown reed Che title of Resolution No. 85-94. RESOLUTION N0. 85-94 ('~) A RES OLOTION OF THE CITY CDUNC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OVERRUL INC AND DENYING PROTESTS AND MAAING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Huque[ to adopt Ree oluti on No. 85-95 and waive full reading. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). Ma cRe nz ie Brown read the title of Reeoluti on No. 85-95. RESOLUTION N0. 85-95 ("~) A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND PROVIDING FOR CONTRTHU- TION TO PAY CERTAIN COSTS AND ERPENSES IN AN ASSESSMENT DIS- TRICT MOTION: Hov ed by Wright, seconded by Mi ke is to adopt Resolution N0. 85-95 and waive full reading. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). Ma cRenzie Hrown read the title o£ Resolution No. 85-96. RESOLUTION N0. 85-96 ('+=) A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TBE CITY OF RAECHO COCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT, ORDERING TEE IMPROVEMENTS MADE, TOGETHER KITH APPURTENANCES, AND APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S "REPORT" NOTION: Moved by Buque t, seconded by Dahl [o adopt Resolution No. 85-96 and waive full reading. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). MacRe n: ie Brown read the title of Reeoluti on No. 85-97. RESOLUTION N0. 85-97 (~~~) A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCEO COCANONGA, CALIPORN IA, AUTHORIE INC AND PROVIDING FOR TAE IS- SUANCE OF EONDS PURSOANT TO THR "IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OP 1915" MOTION: Moved by Mike le, seconded by BuqueC to adopt Reeol uti an No. 85-97 and waive full reading. Motion carried 4-0-I (Ring absent). Ma cReozie Brown read [he title of Reeoluti om No. 85-98. RESOLUTION NO, 85-98 (44) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR TAE CON- RTRIICTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORR9 OP IMPROVEMENT IN A SPE- CIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT City Council Ninutea March 20, 1985 Page 12 NOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buque[ [o adopt Reaolu ti on No. 85-98 and waive full reedivg. Mo[i on carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). Mac Re nz ie Br wn read the title of Resolution No. 85-99. (:.5) RESOLUTION N0. 85-99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND HARING AWARD FOR BALE OP BONDS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ES TABLIS@DiNT OP A REDEMPTION FOND FOR THE PAYMENT OP SAID BONDS MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to adopt Reaolu tion No. 85-99. Mo- tio¢ carried G-D-1 (Ring absent). ~+~~+~ Mayor Mike le called a recess at 10:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened a[ 11:05 p.m. with all members of the Council press nt exce pf Councilman Ring. xxw.t*~ • ! R * ~ f 5. NON-ADVENTI SED NEANINGS No Items Su bm i[[ed * + • x x t 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFP REPORTS (L6) 6q, ETIWANDA AREA DRAINAGE PLAN A,YD POLICIES - Recommend approval of the Inter- im E[iwanda Area Drainage and Development Pol ici ee. Staff reporC by Lloyd Hubby, City Engineer. Mayor Ni kale opened the meeti vg for public hearing. Addressing Council were James Banks, E[ive¢da resident, asked rha[ does it mean the single family only would pay only drainage fees. Dose this mean [hat the drainage fees end the proposed fees stack on [op of each otherT Hr. Hubby responded [here would no ocher fee except the City's drainage fee established at Chia point for this area. This does nn[ establ ieh a fee. James Fr oe[ asked if dovn stream fflciliti ea were included in th ie Plen or will they be picked up in the be lance of the Master Plen? Mr. Mubba re- sponded that under the one plan where the diver[ [o Day Creek, you would take advantage of the Day Creek Imprwemente and would of feet any impact of development on the downstream. If you went with the option which re to fined the regi onel system in Etiwenda, there would be a fee incr amen[ to assist in the construction of the Etiwenda Creek Project. There 6ei ng no further response, the public hearing rea cl oeed. City Clerk Authelet read [he Ci [le of Resolution No. 85-100. RESOLUTION N0. 85-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCAO CUCANONGA, CALIPORN IA, APPROV INC INTERIM ETIWANOA AREA DRAINAGE AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES NOTION: Hov ed by euquet, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No. 85-100 end waive full reading, Notion carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). • : * x ~ ~ City Council Minutes March 20, 1985 Page 13 6B. Mayor Mike le opened the meeting for public discussion. Addressing Council vas Lovell Comes of [he Ran rho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce presented [he re- quest. There being no further public res ponce, the public portion of the meeting vas closed. ACTION: Council concurred [hat if a developer vented to put in a park [ha[ you ld be acceptable end usable for everyone, then that vould be great. Direc- tion to staff vas to inv eetiga to th ie concept fuz Cher. w + t (+7) 6C, CNAFFEY-GAAC IA BDDSE. Staff report by Mary phitney. (;8) MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Wright [o approve the amended agreement. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). (CO 85-71) • x : ~ r + 6D. CONSIDERATION OP TASR FORCE PINDING ON AMBULANCE SERVICES. Staff report by (~9) Lauren M. pee carman, Ci Cy Manager. ACTION: Council concurred to continue Co April 17th meeting for diacussi on and have item placed near the beginning of the Agenda. x+• ,t+: 6E, BTATUS REPORT REGABDINC MODIFICATIOMS_TO C_I_TY _OFFICES OFFICES (COMMUNITY (~O) AEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT). MOTION: Nov ed by Dahl, seconded by Nright to approve [he expenditure of 528,900 to Youag Bui ldera For the Community Development building modifica- tions. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). + ,e x +. x 6F. STATOS REPORT OP PUBLIC SAPETR-CIVIC CENTER PAC ILITY. Item continued to (~l) the next meeting. r x ~ w ~ 1. COUNCIL BUSINESS 7A. APPOINTMENTS ON BISTORIC PRESERVATION COMlII SSION AND PARR DEVELOENENT COM- (52) MISSION. Item continued [o [he nezr meeting. x ,t~ ~ ~: 8. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved 6y Dehl, seconded by Buquet to adjourn tc a Closed Seeeion to consider a litigation matter under the authority of California Government Code Section 5456 .9(a), concerning a matter entitled City of Rancho Cucamonga versus San Berne rdino County LAFCO and City of Fontana, Caee No. SBSC3 OCV 3x356. Mo- tion carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). The mee [i ng adjourned at 12:20 p,m. to Closed Seeeion. City Council Minutes March 20, 1985 Page 14 The meeting reconvened et 12:40 a.m. with all members of [he Council present eacep[ Councilman Ring. MOTION: Moved by Buque t, seconded by Dahl to approve an agreement entitled, "Settlement Agreement and Mntual Release" be [veers the Ci Cy of Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, end San ee rnardino County I,AFC, end authorize the Mayor and City Clerk [o sign said ogre emevt condi ti owed upon and aubj ecC to the fi [y entering into a final agreement vi[h Mr. Coseoulie, Mr. Me [ich, and Mr. Di Iorio formalizing the Memorandum of IIvderstanding on the denai ty to be allwed on their property. Mo[i on carried 4-0-1 (Ring absent). MOTION: Moved by Buque t, seconded by Wright [o adjourn the meeting. Motion tarried 4-0-1 (Ring abe ant ). The meeting adjourned at 12:45 a.m. Reaps c[fully submitted, Beverly A. Au[helet City Clerk