The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985/01/02 - Agenda PacketGL'G'~ 7 Qr~' (~ ~ C1 RANC}{O C.UCt~YOJNCiA _ r CITY COUi~"IL T \{f-~ O ~ Z ~~'Il 1 U > 1977 L iona Park Common i[y Center 9161 Baae Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California January 2, 1985 All its eabnit[ed for [he City Co®cil Agenda moat be in mritiog. The deadline for mmhmitting theme its is 5:00 p.m. w the Yedneaday prior to the meeting. The City Clett"• Off iee tteeirea all aaeh iteu. 1. Ciil T11 OltrF.l A. Pledge of Allegiance [o Fla;. B. Roll Call: Nright Buquet _, Mike la , Dahl _, and Ring C. Approval of Ninu[ea: None submi L:e d. 2. A~OOIICeAIlf9/tttS6RTATI0g9 A. Thursday, January 3, 1985, 7:00 p.m. - RISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, Linos Park Community Center. B. Nedneadsy, January 9, 1985, 7:00 p. m. - YLANNINO COI4IISSION, Liona Park Co®un ity Center. C. Pr esen[at ion of Service Award and City Plaque [0 0e len R ilmurry. 3. COIASRNT CALEIm•Al The Eollomimg Conaem[ G1_odar its are eapeeted to be romtine and nom-ewtrosenial. They mill be acted upon by the Coamcil at one time mithomt diaeweiom. A. Approval of Narran[s, Beg istez No. 01-02-85, and 1 Payroll ending 12-22-84 for a total soon[ of $759,349.70. City '~omcil Agenda -2- Saaunry 2, 1985 H. Approval to accept bonds and agreement for Parcel Map 8648 and Development Review 84-02 located at [he northeast corder of Rochester Avenue add the Santa Fe Railroad submitted by Lincoln Property Company No. 611. RESCLOTION,NO. 85-01 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF T8E CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA, GLIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AC REEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-02 AND PARCEL MAP 8648 C. Apprw al o: Improvement Exteos ion Agr eeme¢ta for Tracts 11934, 12044, 12045, and 12046 (Victoria Planned Community Project) submitted by the Nilliam Lyon Company. RESOLUTION N0. 85-02 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUGMONCA, GLIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EETENSION AGREEMENTS AND IMEROVEMENT SECORITIES FOR TRACTS 11934, 12044, 1X45, AND • 12046 D. Approval Co accept Agreement and Bank security instrument and Final Hap of Tr ac[ 11625 located a[ [he northvesc corner of 19th Street and Eezmosa Avenue submitted by Roy E. De ly Con et rust ion RESOLUTION N0. 85-03 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCRO CUGlgNGA, GLIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND PINAL MAP OP TRACT N0. 11625 E. Apprw el of consul [a n[ contract with Derbish, Guerre and Associates to design storm drain o¢ Archibald Avenue end street reconstruction on Lemon Avenue to eanya¢ Street. Contract not to exceed $15,000.00. F. Approval to award rontract for elec[r ical undergrounding of ae rvice tonne ctione in Underground Otil ity Dietr ict No. 2 (UOD#2) o¢ Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Base Liae Roed to the lowest responsible bidder, Deww, and authorize eze cation of the contract at [he contract amount of 516,520 plus lOS ~~ for coot i¢genciee. 2 7 8 L3 14 28 29 40 City Council Agenda -3- January 2, 1985 G. Approval to award bid for purcLase of teo (30) vehicle 42 mobile radios to Comm-Ser Eaterpr ise a, Rancho Cucamonga, the loves[ bidder, for a total purchase price of $9,283.00. A. Approval of a contract with San Bernardino County [0 46 administer the 1984-A5 Block Grant Houe ing Repair/Rehabil i[ation Programs. I. Approval of Resolution urging reappo in[ment of Fel[ 52 Ingalls to the California Transports Lion Commission. RESOLUTION N0. 85-04 57 A RESOLUTION OP TUE CITY COUNCIL OP 'aHE CITY OF RANCFIO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SCPPORTING THE REAPPOINTMENT OF WALTER INGALLS TO THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMNISS ION J. Approval [o renew liability contract for claims with 58 Carl Herren Company far December 1984 through November 30, 1985 with coat increases of epprorima[ely 3S over-all. • R. Approval to forward Claim ago inet the City by G.G.S. i9 Enterprises, Inc. (CL84-38) for negligence by [he Footh ili Fire District to Ci[y A[[orney and Insurance Carrier. •. 1DVNRTISED PONLIC HNININGB No items subm i[ted. 5. NON-ADVNNTISND ~NINCB A. REGULATIONS OP AMBULANCE SERVICE NITHIN THE CITY OF 62 RANCHO CUCAMONCA. Item continued from November 21, 1984 meeting. ORDINANCE N0, 230 (second reading) 62 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OP RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNLA, At4NDING 1RE uliiuNO CUCAMONCA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF AMBULANCES City Council Agenda -4- Januarq 2, 1985 6. CITT MAEAGEE'S SSA!! EEPOETS A. RECOMMENDATION TO PORt4 PARE AND EECREATION Il~HOVEMENT DISTRICT N0. 1 POE IMPflOVEMBNT OF NEHITAGE AND BED FILL BASIN PARRS ANb ESTAELISE A SPECIAL IMPROVeMENT FUND. RESOLUTION N0. 85-OS A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT FUND POR PARES AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 8. REPORT ON THE STREET IDENTIFICATION SIGN PROGRAIf. Item requested by Council at the December 5, 1984 meeting. C. REPORT ON ZONING DESIGNATIONS. Item reque e[ed by Council at [he December 5, 1984 meeting. D. REPORT ON CAMPAIGN FINANCING AND CONTROLS POB CITY ELECTIONS AE PROPOSED BY TIIE ADVISORY COMMISSION. • ). CODECIL EOSIYE83 No items submitted. 8. AD.IODEdffiNT 72 74 75 76 90 • I •~Ip OI~00pP0 alp OOm+000••1 •-IDPOOOO m~l1Pa0000001[IOary Fi mmWh000~+0 map lpOVmmVOrIt1000000~pm P.pwOW000NO~ON .1 L 1 mlp mm.pOYNn.pm 0~4HHY OIt~mrN.+OIpOOrymOmmO~pN YIpaO.py f 1 ONWP•pO•rPmNmarNOFONmPO~OmY=1NON^I m1P U\NLL~NNPLL~~pP ~ n•, 1 •'IP U1 r'IOm n r~Nm rNl: mT.-I N10 ..rw < Q 1 .n .~ w h N N 6 f 1 31 < i u 2 R 1 ay~~phmPU~YNmYtl.phmP O~-INmYwyrmPONNmYLL\.ptimpOtiNm O 61 NNNNNNmmmmmTmmmmYYY•f YfYY`i YIP I{~mIPNLL~4~1p 1p 1p .OWWd S ¢ I P p•P P P P P P P P P p P P P P p P P P P P P p P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P l f 1 O O U O O o O D O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O U O U O O U O O O O O O O O U 3 1 O O O U O O U O O O V O O O 0 U U U O O O U O D U O O O O O O O O O O O O O U O J V 1 NVI _ NN N NN N_N S 1 ww W w W W w W W W u dl-H r rr rrrl- z i < H H .. .. 1-1 .... .. H n H .. < 1 J Q S 6¢ ¢ ¢ w Q ¢¢ ¢ Q Q 6 Q _ _ _ U _W _ _ _ _ _ _ > Z Z Z orr r rr~-1- Wu W o au` 'Ja a oDOo A Z V W y W W ~ r ~ IJ W W W 2 W W W W 1 W 2 Z Y Z U ~ 2 H H m J O U 1 V ! < < < 2 J S Z U N d S D p. .L 1 i NN N iN d d d iw a~'i wm DWw N.zww n ~ }< Y V P j N N N U J V V W N< N u1 W L J N U Y} UU QO HV HLLLLWV~u vl > <Z dY Q 1 e.l Od >w rNjWHr >~"I r j p U 1 22 dmw ~GUN2J0~-IJLQ2 1>Y J220<J•+ 22JU2UwQ ; 1 ~-•<O ~+ZHm J6^w w01]O OdJ nUw OZ w i >i ~J d n>o< LLnd<Ni NzH1..a •^dd ~iNaaJZN Lo OI UI ¢`•S LLr~d JL <1-FHr >d LLYr l WS 1 Nv1 w02•-wl- OSDN r «SINJ ¢u12 u1 j1~ S I N :J N f w w V u N U N¢¢ ul ¢ w< H w N O U¢ J LL LL u< O¢ y V J O Q N W J l LL¢ { J r h¢ 1- w N V J J L O W W<< l W~ r 1 VwZw~2 L~-•U2 w1~•U VItHHd¢<NNwNJr<UVZ LZ ¢L 2 ¢¢N 7m~-6J.-iJmZH HQf.I r.;.-•rlm rl r.2W .IV r-IZrM2w u} LL¢ w L Z< m 2 u S H~a- T Z w d J 2 V V V S U LL •+ J S 2 2 j V N N Z L U> SSwLL~-•W~uDJ~wWWfLL~iOZ~uODHWWWWLL<~-•w WI~WwJfOwQ< N N Y V<¢ S U< d>¢ L L O; ~., n ~ w U N Q¢ L Q o S S j j m O O m U U N l 2 I 1 1 J 1 U 2 Q Z Z 0 off a c r•N r } > N p < V Z Y Y 1 < r O < < L w 1 H l Y 7 r > d< w p 1 w UH mw w r' I[ Lp. ZHN 2 O V U < Y O S W 1 S Y N N ¢ W U ti r H m 'n ¢ Y y O U ¢Q Hp.l 1 w W} l V 2 l< Z N~ ~ y 'i P Z L t 1- V< O< O O 2 H^WYwUV NZw W¢vl w N W ~Zr~; ~ dry2J V¢'WW t Y VWLWYIHY ¢w SU I Z¢ w<NH> Y¢•+t0 wW1•r 6 I > j N l r i+ W J O Q < 2 W U 2 V V q U d W p J L ~ m l< " ¢ W W N L Z r d V 2 3 O¢ H H Z} L Q Z i N •2 ¢ w r l t 2 l 1 J 2ON m0 OIyHD ~-•r~+Y O WOw<V NFL ~r-~ y2 1 N N Y 2 w¢< N Y W N ¢ r r Z N m W¢ Q U~-1 ¢1- J O Q 6•+J ¢N Y< « •SLLw NtOZ10mw2wNUV I ON<j6u NUS ZrS •ItJIWY • LL6H O LLlN O 1 ~ Q J J Q O S r p N U 2 l J N ry O L Z w U J 2 O S r l< S LL!< 1 m r 0 2 2 Q U¢ U w J< S d w w< o u O. L Z J i w¢ 0 0 0 r~-w W«<Wrr-1 ZN~H OVO O¢VLLJ20 JOOVJW Z2 I J L L V U J r- M O N y r¢< J t O r N O S U N U r Y O 0 I ¢Q 6100ZHStl-IjN JW O W<WF•OLLWO .¢¢NJ WI Uteri (' J 1 <H~"I •(¢¢ ZOI•I<WJ¢QJOJ Nb1.1¢66r j~•I¢>pCIW p.j« Y W W< r r j w J H V¢ r p. V1 Y< O J O J V J J J p• Q Z W¢ r r f U J Z L~ U V 6. ; 1 UVO <p.¢¢¢N «wwl•1-O t< «twZj rIJ00<OOJp m W .c << l<<~¢ l< l<< C m m m n m m U V V 1.1 V U U U y V V U V V O D U U J 1 w I h 1 ; f OONmvpmm~-•D ONOmOlp ~y m+JgmNO nromo +yhmNO•"I It1 Y~ ~ d I .yWOm.~a.+aam..m mlpP alp 00 M'f W~pO ~FlpmaOmmOm 1 hlpmNn~•Ihh W nNl+r Nm IV 11{1 al ml~rwl l~ m 0 0 0 0 a O O O a O g m O O F m OO OO ~~~ N m m P F O P 0 0 0 0 .-I N O I- 0 0 0 E F' O N!! O O F 0 0 0 0 m a m P 0 0 0 F N ZI mODU.+P PFNUmNFI{.OYmOY~mlYti.-rmP01[~N I(~1{~Ommm ml(~.y l{~mY tl N1P If1N aFwNY.4m a1[I Nf-WTON.F II~Ymry~aNN P.+F Vn •y r-NOa N! PY.Ory NP mm .4YP Hm.~O N..H m NN T.~F O ¢ 1 < (L 1 N ^~ N IP N m N .y .~ m .4 .y o < I .. m m ;I < t] O ¢1 aaaaaa OF F'.M1I-FFFFFmmmmYPaFmPO.~ryTYmaFmP O.~Nm! m m m m m m m p P P P P P P P P P O O O O p L K I P P P P P P p~ P P P P P P P P P P P P p P P P P P P P P P P P P P 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 < < 1 O O O O O U O O O J O O O O O O O O O O O O O U O O O O O U O C C O U ; I O O O O J V O O O J O O O O O V V O O O J O O V O O V U O O O U O U O O O U O O O J u o is i t z s r x w w V w U z ~- Z •-..+ f n ti H .r H 1 K N V 2 S 6 2 U 2 Z 2 2 S U Hd V F F 00 Z ~ "'IZA O p :J J JO OJ >O 1 W W Ow ZW MWw2 O[H Wp W W W W O 2 Z N O N O F W N Z W N N 2 X 1 U J 2 w d¢ l U 2~ P N Z p L W J < ~ W< zwl- a < <uW F I Yw JNwV W.J NUU< <.Vd W<J Y.'1 1 Y~ W¢r VS< N¢.w¢ Z% ¢ 6 LL 6j¢ Y LLti WU Z/1¢ W .JF w6 LL m¢ N LK .F.,sW YF.'J ~ a 1 Z J N y N N N Z 1~ N .n O N J L W U N a N N N N N U 1 p N p J d' Z N W 2 w w N LL N J ¢ W L 2 t < Z H d V I ~W w 2NJ_Z JJ(LHWmN2Hwd^Z'IS UFS NZ OtU1LW¢ <ZWI]U -.wd~-¢U Fr U U HN"~ V Zti S¢^^WU6 w I U .'.YJ wZLLILN .SZZ¢ JWt2< ^< ^7JNJ OI w2u NV JJLL~n2{OM7W.(pwU SNt HL F tLL WL<ON WNmN O[[N> im» LLmNN <T ~-UNI-y0 S I w Z w U 2 N W O J N < O F U N N w U O 1- < w w L W N U O s>wpHHUwlJ Upm¢a N d< O w N O 2 r N d W W W m 2 J< U N Z N LL w¢< w 7¢ J O w w w W w a w 1- w<< w¢ O J J¢ w w< N J J pJ w -. J¢ J C< w N U C IL N~ 6 m¢ O S a W :J ¢ N 'L S J O r w 4 ,L d T d U f 0 0 0 6 T L U< W U U¢ I W N 1 Z N •mLO < 1 J 2 S N N 2 JnN U o ~d{< o i ~ ~ Hu < N¢ U 2 2 O U r 2 LL F F V N W Y OUV.+ U d O UH UNOLL Z<~' 1 4 ~+ O ti LL O R 2 p Z ¢V O 2 O J O 2 tn¢O O ~ Op[ ~ LL HWWV V H 1 yU~~ <y¢ < S NNV ~t0)) dW 2 2 Y 1 1 H ¢ ) N r J W w L Z • Z N F r V 7 Y Y O O t 1 •OWJU O O fN i] ZOOH J:J<N~'^.~12 OUH~ ¢ < F{ V d 2 U 0 2 Z ~ Z¢ p U U i L V L< U V H F¢ W H r r- ¢ I Z t i Z n< W u t L J P U L H w 2 < O 2 J U U { 1 ti ~.. .+Z¢YI-~ .rp OSUZwmZ dWwS HYwJJJ ~F ¢HO J j OLLWp ~¢w~+f J ~r¢VN22OON JOO»JJ Or.I YOJ~Ua¢~ pdNrJ¢d HOW¢w .NZ2 J1.9 w )Orr+¢G.O OOS WI- ~N<N O f< J Z 6' OS O U L<¢ n. H<< S fY F 2 2 O< 3 i H H n U Z 2 J O Z 2 2 O W< w w U w W 2 H Z J¢ W w ) w b r F N w rl < O G O J Z t j> L O 2 p O 2 O d) H d LL N U J j> ~< •<< W m ¢ R U W U 1 O O < H IL O¢ ~L N u ~ O < ¢ Y Y O O L 2 Z( Y U 1 J LL ~Jr-.r+Y¢P<NF )~u< 1WYJU(L I-'h WWWH2Q¢¢'INW O J 1 (( J 1 H m Z W V S Y V W W 1 Z 2 _f _O W<< Y J J J< W W W W N i W R W ~-. 'J UZ ~Yd¢2NYUVOWZZ¢« WWtJJJJI"'Fr¢L<'L Y~"1>3 N. 1 Oa{¢<wWtwW H..~JZ2<HOJLLOWwutt``O{{]]02 i2 fwC1W t<w m W UUULO00000¢OWwYLLLLUmLLOUOVYZZK Zen AIM M~U I'1 !fYJOJ ~ wl I[Fg„ f 1 1{~F HI{IaPmmNl•'IOPYFWPIYmN'OYFPMglNmP o1n N~+P Fm ml.l » Y 1 OmPInYPO m~-Om..m ~.y .+rPm min ~fmmPfw Its! N~~+malmP min FFF~yF Fp.~FN F.~'IaFYFFF NnnFf Mw ~-1 .4F 0!•O F~/IFF.4FF 1 ~ 4 I_..~ 4 • i .InNOOCOnooorvmooNmmoPmomampor-POUOmmm..aPONm • 1 nm wluNrOPU~00YY00ryJNOm•101-0•+OOmm000NPPrvYPO~Om I m L 1 NY•.IhmmNPNONhrvOO Pl~h~nmmNOmWmYVrvOUmll)Y NmYYNIgm < 1 YNrYmrY•pNONm mI{Im N~ONO mmNrO YmNU NYmvn lghN••IY mm•~ o•.am •~N rN..rm OJ1m m+~r~.y u ac i <¢ 1 rv mP NL N rm •'IY N n N rl < 1 M1 m 21 < u z : i IpLhmP OrwNmYYr .prmPOnNmYm.p n•mPOti vmYN Qt-mPp.-rNmYw O R I 00000.-I.r•rr•y•-I.+•~•-INNNNNNNNNNNmmmmmmm~•ImmY<•YYYY i ¢ 1 O O O O O_ O O O U O O O U O O O U p O O O O O O O D U O O O U O O O O O O O O U O < < U 3 1 O a O D U O O O J p O O U O O O D U O p O O O U O O O O O D U O O O 'l O O O O O O J V n A N N N N O Z i Z O L Z L[ Z i Z S Z w x W W w V ~ ¢ U 2 1 r I.n MZ •'r Z •'~h'•-~•nNr < O 6 ¢ 2 ¢~- ¢•w ¢ J 6¢¢¢¢¢ Y w W_ p _ Y W ¢ N < m p Z 2 S S 2 S <r rZ F6 '- PO r•1-ti WO O VU OZ O .+Z V•+OJOO .~ ¢ a a 2 4 4¢ N W W 7 W W 1.) w.¢ W y W V W U W m XV Yr Z ¢ NU I < J W 4 t Z U 6 W W N r W y 1 ~- J W 2 1 V )- W w Z W U W¢ J V V W y N.t¢ O p LL6r WrUL ~-•V I ¢ N r J p ¢> r 4JwG ~• •q I LLmWVYV ¢O•+•+ W.] Z N •+JZ lLl-¢ N2 ¢ I O rrL 1J •~ F' N> Z r2 ¢V w rW0) M JLLII) W•+ V 1 ¢ZJ•+VS2 Z+•at Z w2J NL 2Z W .>'<N 6WZ N 1 M1OGY w0 GJLW O JSpJLL•+< HJZr+rN02J( rV1-~w N¢< J> ~+ V x N lJ 6 A¢ Z •. Z m Z J O 4 N W U w p¢ N J Z N 7 OI ^Ow 6J<tLLZp ~+<rZJr>•+2wJw O<70 O U N Y N N¢ N J .~~u ~- r U' N N Z> O r r U 2 m 7 F F• ¢>< Y Z W> m LI O WL WV ¢O <NZw~N<w 2M«06<~- O wl O¢wxwu¢.+r .Jy<w.+ w<06N.ny ZU-~VrZUU¢ mPW<OV 7NrV•I<•Z•:Y SWZJ~r¢L+d•V+m LONLLaw.-~rrVjZ=•-• VyOmnZJ< LL Z LL 4 N W m h 7 u. LL l Z< W O y L N LL N O¢> O h m S LL U L m W N •'r O m LL N r J W O u w ,) Z>> J W L O Z J J 2 LL<< W O¢ h J J J1 J w w O O O p O O m m LL< wSWVWJrrmPOU¢m 2 Y V •Z I V 2 OU001 I Z _V ( r U U V U 6_ .-~ U J •+2 Y NZ 02YL20 U x O O q Y U L O O O O U Z O ON •' ^w WV•~ ro 000 J LL <qZJ o6vNiw O<WQ> >j•<+•(+.<r •<+•<it t'J Z hZ JOO•'• r O OWrJ N¢(N0 •(¢ 202222 ¢ MW < zwWJOmY.>uNU zrxz ~p UYp<4~ ( xas¢~[G u ~ WLOW (r•<J UW.nrZWr NUOV QUr~ LLx000000 Jr LZ Sxp W.nxJJ2 OL w.u ,n 2204-•NUZ L•+LLLLLLULLx w> < OpYUOrxUr-W<r'4 JLVJa LU(rZr¢ O O<nH•+r•Inp NQ Z O¢ N Y. ¢ O V L ¢~] QJ < J O O 2 6 r O< LLJ U W V J J J J J V O Z W I r2<uN;](..• LJ4LJVSNN^•O¢JO< J ti<t(« ¢JN LL 1 w >_ O 2 ._+ ¢ U D O<¢ Y LL¢ N__ N_ 6¢ t w x Z N V V U U U N< O O w .Z. w OWrww wwN r<OI-YYJwr-( OLOUN W Z J p V Z l •'~ ¢ L L O O x N r W N Z m 2 (Y O W O 2 Z Z L 2 W O 6 O <1•Z« LO O.• <4rw <.1 YWN40ZmLU¢¢¢¢¢ZOwO N 2 J J Z Z r LL J W U U N N F F. W F w M Wr- < 1 N W W w W W O h N Y ~r<Z¢UOOm<IO¢Vr ¢Yq¢ - mO2wYZN SSZSLSwnN YrW J 1 ZLW<1-~r"11~•LZU•'I M¢NWWWWNNW U¢WN •ffrr~l•f Q I() w w W O J O J O ( N Z m 11 JLL< WLLJxx(l<¢¢x d'R¢R'NNNNNIII<O r•N NNNN~y1JNN rv W ; <1 ••mulmYNr~mYfmOYmNJ)m m.UyN NI~~N {0 ~ POPP~O N hl FnmYmml[IY mltl lam 000 PIVOW NPI'•rF ahPN Yh~pm m•+N ~r hlq P~. r-1 .. .1 n101C J)m 1 h~FhNFhYNONr~•.NmNhhmhm ~l'•t'•Ih hAmmmlrl 111N I-m 1 r 1 Ib u 1 aPO.. ~onaoooraOOmo • I LL1 ~+1>ry mlll0<r O.nU ONPIF m • ~ • • ~ • • • r ~ • • ~ r 1 Y L 1 mPP.p ItIJNrNm.pd Pln Nl{~ P a 1 m rr1tiNY14 V'TlnQggYN r • 1 N ~''1ti m mr N1'1n '~ u ¢1 < s I .~ m..rv M p < I P jl m 1 < 1 Z Z 1 .prmPU~+NmYLLl .pr mP V~+ O ¢I ?YYfWWIPNIPNNNI{~N .OW L R 1 0 0 0~~ 0 0 0 0 0~~ 0 0» O V 2 1 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V O D U V O U I 1 N y O 1 L L V S 1 W ~) F~ i .. .. u a i R 1 ¢ ¢ J 1 f 1 Z S 1 Y O 1 O O ~- I N 1 W W W W O W 1 N N Y 1 N 1 Z Z2 2 J! Z j u iJU V jm u W N f 1 J J J J O W I~ J W Z 1 N N N N N N LL N N R'1 UW1~ WW~wJwnnN V'¢MN U I < Z 2 2 Z J Z p ~" J W Z W J Z N 1 IL ~+r~W •'~~+p rlp ~p )~+Zpr H N< j N N p N O p LL t M n 4 N O 1 2~ L O D O p p N LL 0 2 7 :1 am ammNm ~NI-~.uNm W i W W u N a O J O O w O U N W Y O i W O rl h2V222U2^+"USZ U2 20r 'O Jr+OW L'+r~0>~+J W S~ LL W LL W W n W W LL p W W 1 < W w ti iL W LL W O< LL L W O LL W LY)~+LZOS ZOlOCUOOC 1 1 1 U 1 2 1 u .. 1 z .+ ~ i m ~ 1 Y ¢~ ~ Vy 1 V O Z O m 0 N 1 K m UwO00C nINiI Z 1 M Z W J U p~ f 2 < 1 2U Z ti Q 1 U¢OUrU+JJ2f¢WOr IU+ < ; ~O Lf1~IJ~njpr2a j LL<6N t 06 I" 1 J r~ w¢ N O N a j 0 U LL 1 Qrp20WWr~+L> p ~ O 1 MN~OUJ~JL<R •6 1 R J j LL U a Y 0? L J m Y u N W 1 y l 1 O O L ~N p C J L r 1 N L N 2 0 W 2 W ~ O¢ Y m 'U J 1 WRZYahrUrY2NW022 r 1 J W< h J J J N N J O¢>> O W 1 n r r U 0 O j< Y Y> 1 w 1 N i i OmnP~+Nmrr OInPOP.nn ~ p 1 O m~I o r y n r r w J N m O ~O 0 I MrNfrr NM1~f NTr Mlnrr • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 2, 1984 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer ~;UGMq,, ~~ 7 ;~ ~, ~ !ia F ~ ~~2 !'> 19" SUBJECT: Acceptance of Ronds and Agreement for Parcel Map 8648 and Development Review 84-02 located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and the Santa Fe Railroad submitted by Lincoln Property Company No. 611 The attached resolution is submitted for the approval of an Improvement agreement to guarantee construction of missing street improvements. The improvements are required with the development of 3 warehouses by Lincoln Property Company No. 611 located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and the Santa Fe Railroad. The Bonds are as follow: • Faithful Performance Bond f140,000.00 Labor & Material Bond f 70,000.00 The subdivision of the land, Parcel Map 8648, has not been approved for technical accuracy and is not yet available for presentation to City Council. RECOMMENDRTION It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Bonds and Agreements authorizing the Mayor & City Clerk to sign on behalf of the City. Resp /~/submi ed, LBH:JXhl.ko Attachments I~ L n CITY OF gANCNO LULANONGA II:7 ROYENENT AGREEMENT FOR Parcel Nap No. 8610 L Oirectbr Revi er Bt-02 KN OR ALL MEN RY THESE PRESENTS: That thfs agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the prpvisi Ons of the Municipal [ode ono Regulations of the City of 0.ancho Cucamonga, State of Cal if prnia, a monies pal torpor atian, hereinafter referred to as the City, and /v,vutax YT.aKArr Gnrirru MJ/// w CA taecIIV,l/A cravyAJ, FAerrrasN.P hereina t ret e'er eo to as the Deve oper. THAT, HNERE AS, said Developer tlesires to tle vel op certain real property in said City Located on the rest side of Rochester Avenue north of 8th Street; and NHE REAS, said City has establish eo certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval; and NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and be [w een the City and the Developer as foilars: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct dt Develop er's expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof ri[hin twelve months from the date hereof. • 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of [he resat of ion of the Council of said Lity approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default an the day follor- ing the firs[ anniversary date of Bald apprpv al unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by saitl City as herein afL er provid- ed. 3. The Develpper may request atltlitional time in rhich to complete the provisions of this agreement, In rr5ting not less than 30 Oays prier to the default date, and 1ncluOing a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In <oniidera- H an of such request, the Ctty reserves the right to revier the pravisi onz hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and cuff l<iency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects tp comply with the provisions of [his agreement, the Clty shall have the right at any tfine to cause sNd Drov isf ans to be completed Dy any lar- /ul means, and thereupon La recover from said Developer and/or his Surety the full cast and expense 1n<urreo in so dos na, S. Cons [ruction permits shall he oht afned by the Devel- oper from [he gHfce o/ the City Engineer pr ipr to start of any work ri thin the public right-of-ray, and the developer shall conduct such work in full compii once rith the regulations contained therein, Non-compliance may result in stopping o/ the work 6y [he Lity, and assessment of the pen altles provided. 6. Public right-of-ray improvement rcrk required shall be constructed in cpnf ormance rich approved fmprpvement plans. Standard Spec l/i cation s, and Stan da^d Orarings and any special '3 amendments thereto. [pnsfruct ion shall include any transitions andior other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage ar public safety. Errors or ommissioni discovered during canstruc• [ion shall be cprr ec[ed upon the dlrec ti on of the City Engineer. 0.evise0 work due to said pion mOdif i<ations shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original punned works. 7. Nork done within existing streets shall be dilig<nL- ly Dursued to <ompl elf on; the City shall have the right to complete any and alt work in the event of un,j us [if led delay in completion, and tm recover ail cost and expense into rreO from the Developer and/ar his contractor oy any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocations, or remoV al pf d0y cOm pOdent Of any irrigation Na[er system 1n CanfilCt Nlth the rOQulred Mork tp Lh! SdLITf dCC lpn Of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other OebNS from the public ri gh [-Of-way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as d7rec led by the Community Development Director. 11. The Improvement security Lo be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion o/ the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the aDDroval of the Lf ty p[torn ey. The prin- cipal amount of said improvement Security Shall not be less than the amount Shown: • • 2 ``\ • FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: S1a0,00-. 00 Name rind addre55 a` Surf ty: tnem tr tal [ndemn t[y Company e.0.aox 5056, son Jo ae, ca. 95L50 NAT E0.I0.L ANO L0.800. iyp°: Principal Amount: $70,000.00 Y rifle dnd ddtlr e55 0( SOr![y: Indw total Indeaniq Company e.0. eon 5056, son doa<, Ca. 95150 CASN DEPOSIT MONUME NTAT ION Type: Principal Amount: Il ame and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PR7OR TD ACCEPT AMCE BY THE CITY 1`1 MIT YE SS HEREOF, the par[i es 4ereto have caused [here presents t0 be duly eaecuied'and acknowledge wiM alt `ornalitiEs required b~l~ pn the at set fort opposite their signatures. Date yy/ti S by ~C~i •~•~~ 4>w Developer gna[Ore noted Date py Oev eloper ~gnawre Pn nted Accepted: City pf Rancho Cucamonga, Cal if arnia 0. Yunici pal CdrDOratian 8y: Mayor Attest: City grk v /J ApPrlved: ~w / ~' / ~ ~~-~' tf Y/~ trorney DEY ELOPER'S SIGNATUpEi MUST BE NOTARI IEO C~ 7 S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDHGM1 • ENGINEERING DIVISION ENCROhCM1ENT PERMIT FEE SCIIEUULE For Irtprpvement: RLCI e•STCR \llSUfi S Bth 4RI:TT OYGITr STCRI P21 Oa[e: t1-1-NS wmouteo oy: i Filx Rerarence: , ~ _Lity Oraw mg No. NOTE: Does npt include current fee for writing permit or pavement deposits Ow ;r;-rr DN[r Pa ce A"mrrr LF. P.L.C. cure - i2" L.G. 24^ 9u axr 7,23 -rv L.F. P.r... c~ra ~ 7" ' ^. 2." g~:c zr 5. C:7 - _ L.F. P.C.C. cuo only i. EO L.f. A.C. tern ~EO ~nr~ ± S.F. 6" P.C.L. lid^e s'.'< 1.1i ~ n.3 . ~;p S. F. Or ive :oprvac~ ~~%0 G ` S.F. 8• P.C.C. cross ::Car ( ~. art) 3.=~ t "y C.Y. Stre^t exc av att on 1.E0 1 X11 _ C.Y. Imparted ego an <nent 1. i] ~ >' av S. F. Preparation of suJ~"a:e 0•:= t l~ ~ •- ;t: S.F. Lrpsh2d agg. bass (per inch chick) J.]]x I1 0 't A t_ TON A.C. (over 1700 tans) ' ` TON A.C. (900 to 1377 tans) ii. 70 S9i T08 A.C. (500 t0 900 toad 45.OD 31-^i _ TOa A.C. (antler 509 [on:, 60.~D S.F. A.C. (J" thick) 0.'S S. F. Pa[ch A.C. (trench) 1.75 j ;;-i S.f. 1" to i[k A.C. oven aY 0.10 t.;`S ~ EA. Adjust loner manhole to gr adz '%D•OJ Jy~P_ ~- EA. Adju s[ sewer clean oo( :v yraea liJ, LS EA. Adj osi cater valves a Or aee ]S. GO ~ EA. Street lights 1000.00 t n _ L.F. Barricades (tnf ersac. SSDO ninl 1.C0 L.F. 2 x 3" redwood ne ve• 1.75 ~"gp S. F. Aemoval of A.C- oav t~aet ^ O. ii 10 7 A.1'; L.F. L F. 0 Removal of P.C.C. :. Aeavval of A.C. Cerr . 1.00 ___ EA. Street signs 200.C0 EA. Reflectors and posts 75.00 ]1S ~- L.F. Concrete black wall 25.OD S.f. Retaining wall 20. C0 TON Agg regatx base 7•~ L.Y. Cant rete structures 425,00 L.F. ld" RCP (2000 G1 29.00 ~ L.F. 30 »' RCP (1500 D) 35,n0 075 - Sin L.F. Jfi" RCP (2000 D) 49.00 t L.i, AB" RCP (1200 0) 76.00 EA, Cat cN basin M = 4' 2000.OD EA. Catch basin N ' 8' 2900,00 ~ EA. Catch basin N "~' N' 6500.00 4.SOn _ 1 EA. Local depression l4' 1500,00 1-ion _ EA. Local depress ivn l2' 1000.00 - i EA. Junctfan structure 5000,00 ~ EA. Outlet s[r uc tun, Std 0506 1500.00 fA. Outlet structure, Std 1507 500.00 EA. Guard posts a0.00 "" '- - L.F. Guard Dane1 (woadl 25.00 -- L.F. Sawcut 2.00 EA. Headwall (4B" ainy) 4000.00 L.F. Aednood header 1,75 oat l S.F. Landscaping 6 irrigation 2.75 10 X31 z L.F. Roll taro (P.C.L.( 7.50 IS LS Str:et $[npmg 015 EHGI NE EA ING INSPECTION FEE S b95.72 SUd TOTAL 1~6 •RFST00.A 1011/OEL IN EAT ION CASH LL o~ CnNTINGENCY COSTS ,z sP DEPOSIT (REFUN0A0LE) Fn iTNFUL PERf00.MPNCE BOND (100%) ue MUNUME N!AtION SU0.EIT (CASH) ~' LA00R ANO MPTERI AL BOND (50%) ae Mursuant to Clty of Rancna Cucanron9a Municipal Code, Title [, CnaPter 1.00, adoptilq San Bernardino County Ladd Tlt les, CMPters 1A, a cash restoration/delineation daposR iN11 N ^ade prior to issuaiMe a/ an En9lneerlig Constru~ an Perwit. r -- . a. RESOLUTION NO..f4i~YWYlR- g5-Qf • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR.D1RfCTOP. REVIEN N0. 84-02 i Z.,ur~"" WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on November 30, 1984, by Lincoln Property Company as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to tl~e real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast Corner of Rochester Avenue and the Santa Fe Railroad; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Director Review No. 84-02; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said • Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved znd the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on a s, ayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authe et, ,ty er jaa 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOftT GATE: January 2, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager iy;, FROM: Lloyd B. Rubbs, CSty Engineer BY: Barbara Kroll, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreements for Tracts 11934, 12044, 12045 and 12046 (Victoria Planned Community Project} submitted by The tlilliam lyan Co. The Wiiliam Lyon Company is requesting a one year extension of time to complete the eff-site improvements for Tracts 11934, 12044, 12045 and 12046. fie original approval was granted on August 9, 1982 for a period of One year and extended on August 9, 1983 for an additional one year period. This extension will expire qugust 9, 1985. Agreements and Bonds in the following amounts are on file ir, the City Clerks office: Tract No. Faithful Performance 11934 E 338,000.00 12044 3,700,000.00 1,400,000.00 (landscaping) 12045 1,284,000.00 500,000.00 (landscaping) 12046 1,073,000.00 RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Improvement Extension Agreement for the above described tracts an0 authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Resp tfully submitted, ~~~/ ~`~ LBM;B ko ~~/ ~ Ati!dchments J 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUfAMDIGA lMPPOVEMEHT E1lTEN$I0N AGREEMENT FOR Tract il9JA KROR ALL NEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and enl erect into, fn conformance with the prat/ is ions of the Subdivision Yap Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cdl ifornia, a muniapal corporation, by and between the said City, nereinaf ter 2fefre0 i0 d5 the City, and THE 'pi LL[0.Y LYOY CO4P.ANY referred [o ds fhe Oev 07 oper. MITtsESSETN: THAT, RHEREai said Devel ~Oer entered into an fmpnvement a9reemenc with the Ctty as a reppiss[e to issuance bf bu ildings perms ts, and NNEREai, said Developer desires an eztensipn of time m co-oie!e the tens p( the said improvement agreement, NDa, THEREFORE, it iz hereby agreed Sy the City and by said Devei oper as /allows: 1. The comp tetiOn date of the terms of Me Said improvement agreement is hereby extended by a Deripd of se monins from the date o£ espirab on of Me slid d8reement. Expitatlon dat¢ is August 9. 1905 2. Increase in improvement securf ties to reflect current improvement eDTts shall De furnished Dy cne deve toper with this a9reemenc and shall he approved by She City Attorney. 7. The re4uired hood and the additional principal amounts [hereof are lei forth on the attached Sheet. 4. A11 other terms and cpndit tans of the said improvement agreement sh ati remdln the Tdme. qs evidence o/ understanding the Orovis:ons contained herein, and of intent to comply with Yame, the Oe /e !oper qas submitted [he telow de scrfoed improvement security, and has off iced hiT signature hereto; FAtTNFDL PERFORMgN[f eOND Oescr lotion: TRACt p^9J4 qdd itiDnal Principal amount; No Addltt~nal $erety: Bond AEEress: MATERI A< WID LABOfl 80!10 Description: Bond Additional Principal AmounL• Yo Adau tonal Surety: ApPpDVEO qi i0 FDNM gddress: CASH OEPDSIT MDpUMENTING BOND ~ gddi ti anal Cash Oeposi tt ~ murr ra NNPa omnnw tasaanw NAtHTENAMCE GUARpI1TEE BOND Principal Nnount: Ta be pas tact prior to acctptance pf the prof ect by the City. u.e.eaeae.o¢ewAwe.aaae.e..».aee.w..aA.aa¢e..a. waee«A.¢..ae~aAAe.oa CITY OF RAYCNO CUCA40:IGA OEVEL LAL IFOANIA, a municf pal carp oration By: n Fa rd on dike s, :agar Asst n er:etary e the wl ll lam Lyon Company Rtlit: iefen Na Sierman, y !rk IIOIF: DEVELOPERS SIGNATURE MAST 8E IIOTARtiFA 9 CITY CF RAlICNO NChMONGA (NPAOYENENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT FDR naet tzq.~ KNO'd ALL MEN 3T iH ESE FR ESENTS: That this 3gre?me nt Is made anp entered into, in con Pormance vilh Che provi si ens of the Su bdiv+s .qn I^ap Act of the Oty c` Rancho Cucamonga, Cai iforni a, a mun+ctpal corporar pn, by and be Caeev the sam CI C;/, h2 relnaf ter f2fefred to as Cn! [iC), dnd tnE 4ILLIAY LYL`V ;ONP iNY rQ ferc?d tp d5 In2 DQVeloper. MITNESSETN: THAT, AFEREAS Sa+d Devel Goer ?n[?r!n inW an +*~orove^. !nt agre¢mert vrtb the [ity 35 E reCp151 t2 CO ISSJ anC°_ cf b0+idi.3Ci ^. _, ma, dnd 'ANER EA S, said Developer desi ros an extens+on pf time tc co.ap fete [he ter-s of the said V+ry rpvQ.mert agreement. NCB, THER4 GRE, R fs hereby agr!ed Sy the ;ity and Sy said C!•re leper ds fpilpvs: 1. The rmplev on dace of the to raz of roe sa+d imprp vement agre!men[ is hereby extended by a periptl of t3 months frcm the oat=_ of exp+r of ;on pf Cha Said ag reemen C. ESei noon ~'Kugusx 9. I9B 5. 2. [nCredee in imgrovemBOC sec uritie5 [o ref lee[ current imp rpveTent cosy shall be Purn is't!d by [ne dev!lop!r aRn this agre!ment and sfia11 he approved by the City Attorney. 3. the required bard and She addio- ;nal pn nc+eal amcunts Uerepf are s¢t• Iprth on ene atia[ned sheet. 4. All pt her terms sad cpndiHvns c. [he sa+i i~nprpvement ag rQ!^. en[ shad remain me same. As !vi Bence of unders tdndino the prcv ;'~pns cants:ned n=~^'n, and of intent tp comply vifn same, the Cevel vo er has sucm tt zd the be lov da scr ibed Imo roveme nt security, and Nas affixed nis sigwture 'n a re m: FAITHFUL PERFCRMAHCE DDND Oescripf+qn; good Add::i anal Principal Ar, cunt Nn Addt voml Surety; Aed ress: MATER IPI AND LA80R BDHO OE SC ripti Pd: rPACT r1304a Atld it i0ndl PfinC lpol 0. m0un[: ,yo Additional Surety: eaod gpppOVFO AS i0 FORM Address: CASN DEPOSIT MCNUNENT LYG BDXD °"R ~~I D ~~ A.,I gddit icn?I Cas h Depc Si t; L ~ port mt~ x~.'on kapp mcuvw[arto5ma MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE DDND Principal Amcunh Te be post!d pr+pr td dcceptance of the project by he City. e...ea.«R«~e«..ooua~w..~euar~e «.err~.a .. ,«.e.r.er «.u reaa»o~~~ LIT'/ OF RaNCNO LUf,A(aDNGA OEVEI 1 LAL IFGRtii A, a morn cipal corporation • By: 5[r ven Ford on rdtee s, aynr Aay uMe Secce ear A[teit: ihr Villiam Lyon Company dUr¢n F1. Xd SS Qrmdn, Cy Qrk NDTE: DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE M15T BE NOTAIIIIED J~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT E%TE NSION AGREEMENT FOR Tract 1205 K:iO'N ALL MEN 9Y idEi PR ES E'fT S: That this agr=e^enC ism ^_ and en [erect into, in cJ Of CrmanCe 'with [he prCVtsiCns .f [he ° 1'n si On wep Act of Cne City :f Rancho Cucamonga. Cdl iform a, a aunt typal cpropra[u^., by and hetw¢Qn the svE City, here mdf ter refereed tp ds thQ EI[1, a:IE T'.F. ':I LLi 14 1.:".N "nyPna l' referred to as the Ceve icpe~. NITtIESSETH: THAT, 'NNEREdS said OQVeloper en [ereE into an ~,-crarement agr¢ement ai to [he Ci [y as a reo'disite to issuance of buildires perm ts, and NNER EAS, said Oev¢icp¢r des+res do extension pf tL:,e [o cpxp :ele tF.¢ t¢r~s :: the said imp rovemgnt agre¢ment. NON, THE?.EFORE, it is hereby agreeE Sy :he City and by said 0eyeleoQr as ful loss: 1. the completio'i da [e of the terns of [ne said improvement agreement is hereby extended py a periotl of 13 mpntns from the date of exp:ratlpn of the said agre¢men 2. Eap[ra uon late is August 9. 19P.i 2. Increase in improvemen[ securities to reflect current improvement cos[s shall be turn ish¢d by the Eeveloper wi [h [his agroemen[ and iha17 pe approved by the City A[[c rney. 7. The repui r¢E bond and the additional principal amounts there of ar¢ set • fprLh On [hC ditdched ShQEt. 4. All other terms and c-ldtti ons :f Lh¢ saltl imvrovement agr¢eaen: shalt renaiv [ne same. As evidence of unde•st anE ing the prov'5'pns contained here tn, and pf in[en[ to [OAp ly Nrth SdmP, [hQ OQVQ1000r nd5 z'J t.-,r [fQ'J [nP bQ1Ca GQSCrIGQd lnprovQmE n[ 5¢L'ari [y, and Ilan L:f l%ed !Ii5 Sl jnd[BrP CEfECO: FA ITNFOL PEA FORMAN[E 90N0 Oes cripCion: THncT wl2oc> Addi ti oval Principal PmounC %~ nddtti onal Surety; Band Address: IMTERIAL ANO LAHOR BOIID Oe icriptiCn: Add it ionai Princ ipai Amoun[; Yo Addttinnal Surety: APPROVED AS i0 fORM Address: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTIDG BOND ~ ~~ 1 0 1981 i Pddit ipnal Cash OePOS it: ~ brr aaCwngr x wupa.ra rxirama MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE e0H0 P incip dl Amount; To Ce pps :Qd odor to acceptance of Me project by the City. e.n.«.«t.w«.....a.:.....a.a.....»........, e'.r.«.r..n..o... aa.aa... CI1Y OF AAIILNO CUCwOYGA OE'!E' [AL IF OP.N IA, a munlc ipal corporation DYI w F rd on ;N'aQ s, MuYC~ - ,\ scant Seu Atte z[: ThQ wllllam Lyon Company au ron , . Na sserman, Tty erx MOTF: OEVEIOPER'S SIGNATURE fIUST BE NOTARIZED ~ , C[TY DE RANCHO NCANDHGA IMPROYEMENf f%TENSION AGAEENENT Tra~a f4@_¢ KR00 4LL +'EN BY TNESE pPE$ENiS; That tMS apreeaent is made and enierse into, id ca nfOr^3nCe xito the pr.Yislans of the Sahd i'n Si On 'cap ACC of the :i CY pf Aancno Cuc cap ng a, California, a munlcipol coropr at ion, Sy a*d oe: u¢a+ the sad Cfty, Jere ladf ter refrrrea to as the Ci4/, and ix". F:4{,;+h ''„taz ;::^t edFY reF¢rred tp as ih¢ 9¢vCl peer, NIT'tES$ETH: THAT, 'ANE?E+i Sa :O CCVeI Op e' Cnt=red Inca d0 IRCrp v¢2ent 3^yr=e-.CK site t.., City as a r=.autst to :0 is suanre of hufidings p¢rm+s, one LXEA EA $, said C¢Veloper deail95 an ex[ens tort pf the W Cpflp le to the LeY^S ]Y the sat: ;2provexenc a9ro¢aenn, NO'q, iH;?CF;RE, it is hereby agre¢d CY the City and by Bald ~,,e `cp¢r ds failoas: 1. the ccro tet mn Cate of the lers of me sa+tl ,mproeenent aare¢nent id hereby es :CnEez by a per'pd of t1 mdnfhs frcn h drt¢ of ¢xp:rat :on of tha card agreement. [xpt ra tSLF'aate fs AOqu.a[ 9. 5~,d5. $. (r.C YO LSe fn 1111Pi0Ve^enI Se[Or `i:'Ie5 CO r¢f !eC: Current imprOVP,Tent COS:i Sfiall be fu Mizhed by the developer with tors agree^~ent amp Shall be apprpvec by the City At arn¢y. • 3. The re;u+red bond and the atldi: ^.ral princtaal mounts the»;f ar¢ Set (crib pn the at:acpeu ;h,eC t. a, A11 of Her tarns and conditions c` the sa+d improve-¢n[ ag^eeoev snail remain Che Same. AS $V IJanC9 Of Vpd2 YSt dnOlp9 [YIB prpV!5', ens Cprttdi vatl Ner9+l1, 3ntl of 102eM1t ip coop ly with carne, the Cevetpp¢r has surnttep the 6etee descn p¢tl ~,*orov¢ment decor itY, and Ilan dfficed hli SiGndCUre ~ereC T. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE RONO OeatY 1Pt10n; TPAGT eI R3h AEEtC10naI Fi inLrDal ATOllnt; So Add(tional Sure[Y: flood RdEres z: MATER IAI AND IPBOR BONG Ceseriptf pn: ACdiCOndl pn nc tpol ArAOOnt; No Add lrlonal SO fCLy: Band Address: APPRDYED AS tO iDAM CAGH DEPOS iT NDNUMENTLYG BONG aN_ ~TF1~]i~_, t+t+ PEO 12 TOnal ,ash Ceppdi t: rt an endnrtr ra MA[NTfHANCE GUPR ANTEE BOND ww aaaprwa alwreu PriRRc ipal Amount Te CR oo, :¢E on Oi to acceptance pf ine project by th9 C1ty. C(f'r CF 4AaCY0 CUCd aONGA Oi V. O~ CRL lFC"nN{R, a rm n+c Tool corporation BY: rovr+, Ford JOn J. :fi kp 5, MdYOr Aesl s[3 nc f[rr . At tech the vtll lam lvo~ comPa ~y Lauren M. Nasf ermdn, 41[Y tZ re rk -- 6DfE: DEVELOPER`S S1CNA111RE MUST BE NDTAgIZED ' RESOLUTION N0, iA~L~-C~~R 85-~2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT E%TENSION AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRACTS 11934, 12044, 12045, 0.ND 12046 'WHEREAS, the City Council of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration Improvement Extension Agreements executed on January 2, 1984 by William Lyon Company as Developer, for the improvement of oublic right-of-way adjacent to real property specifically described therein, and generally located north of Baseline and west of Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Extension Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as Tractsk 11934, 12044, 12045, and 12046; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreements are secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of • Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreements and said Improvement Securities be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on i e s, ayor ATTEST: every A. uthe et, ity erk jaa ~~ nrmv nc n n wrnvn nttr n w,rn~rn n • STAFF REPORT 2c' I ~n CI T i, L Y GATE: January 2, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd e. Hubbs, City Engineer BY; Jahn L. Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer F', ~~ i2 ~~> 19".7 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Agreement and Bank Security Instrument and Final Map of Tract No. 11625 located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue submitted by Roy E. Daley, Construction. The attached bank security, agreements and final map of Tract No. 11625 for the tract development are submitted herewith for Council approval. The project is a division of 8.26 acres of land into 5 lots located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue. The subdivision was tentatively approved by the Planning Commission on July 21, 1981. The Union Bank security amounts submitted are as follows. J Faithful Performance Labor & Material Tract No. 11625 E425,300.00 E212,650.00 RECOMHENDgTION It is reconmended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract No. 11625, accepting the bonds and agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign on heha if of the City. Respectfully sub fitted, .._i ~' -~~L6H:~LM:ko Attachments CHAFFEY J~NT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ~°°~•~°~°°° ~~O mr.[p [a,~s.am orv,n Fin canrenrvia svae .. .. ~. ~~•. .w, s...... ~ .~. ~.,~ w ~e:m ~ ., .. ..:'.:.. Decenber 4, 1984 DE pf'nar,~pyr OF~jA 4ri ~ ~ ~ I?J4 ofLSchocloDistrictlCapacity, 7[S+9+I0~11~+~~r12'3r~7JG Within the Chaffer Joint Union Hiah School District attendance boundaries for [he following descrihed prof ec t: Location/Description: _. Tract No. 11625 - 102 condos Tract No. 11781 - 73 condos 19th Street 8 Hermo°a in Ra ocho Cucamonga • (lumber of Dwellings: '175 Anticipated Completion Date: December i935 The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 26 students will be provided within 24 months of tl+e completion of the above prcject. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all scheol building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points, The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final maD or the issuance of building permits by the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall validate such commitment. ~~a~.+'.'aos"' Svperimrtertdenrt/As sta Superintend by Dianne Allen T 1D.~4~9.- ~~ cc: Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga '~ Darrell Connerton DALY CONSTRUCTION 9310 Baseline Rd „ St, 102 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1 987-8024 ! S Alta Loma School I)flstrict 9350 F Baseline Road • Poss Ol11cc Oos 370 • ,Ub Lama. C alifornia 91701 • 714/9E7~6 ESIR6lishrA ItltlS ROANO OF TRUSTEES ROIIE111 5. FRU51 NOIlIi0.T N' 1,\NGf. M:\N MNS. LI% cALLnHI NI MIIS. SANUHA A. OF.It I.I' JOIIN C. IIOOR JOHN E. McMURTRT Suprnntrnlrnr FLOTO M. STORK rr.sonnrVSuppert Servlr _.yol'ember_1~,,, 198J___ STACT NELSON I)~ILe Euilnraa Srrvlna MILLY STRAIN Cumru(um/Sprrla/ fn/t Lli:'TCii OC CIiIM'I Pi C(1'CION POR SCIIOQ I. DIa'l'ItI C'T fp,pr\UITY ['or Residential Construction within the Alta Loma School Disc rict. UIiVLLOPCR Daly_Const_ructio~___ _ ___ TRACT NUMBIiR_ 11625 LOt'A'I' I oN 19th Ilermosa .. .Ii-.__ r.._ Northwest Corner Nl1PI0liR 01' UWIiLh ING UN I'f5 102 Condominiums AN'PI CIPA'1'!iU CO~NPLL 1'TON DA'I'L•'_-November 1985 • Gent 1.!nen The Alta Loma School District hereby certifies that the capacity For .3[1.R sturlonts wilt be provided within - 2A months of the completion o[ the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy C. Greene Lease/Purcha sn Act of. 7976, or an'r suc- cessor Act, in such manner that the State Allocaeions Uoard may fund all ::drool building projects under its current rules and regulations without. priority points. '1'he commi Gnent of I:his capacity :; h,\1l expire y0 days Crom the date of this letter. App rnval of the final map or the issuance of build: na permits by the City of Rancho cucamonya within that 90 day peL ilnl shall validate such cbmmi tmcn C. Vhry Cully your.^„ sU'~L'.a„ L,..~ , t ~4~RX.t~:,ti I .1LQA.1- Stacy li, ,\'clwm • \Jminist r:rtul' of 6usincss Sr. rvices jh cc: Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonya I ~~ ~E..m. :.L-la:...: ~s.r.....-....r._,_a ~.i._~__.~- - .-. 21884__paY. RCCLi[a - ~'9 C?"'%'^_.t. E 5 159UE0 AS A !IATT9A CF Y;fO'•.IAI;ON C'ILY?n'p C6YFER$ ' )C3:.i9:FO;RVECEpTIFKATE NCLCER. iN'2 CEPTIFIEATE'uDES NOT AL!END. . T`:D ii Ali<A TYS CO•/ERAGE FFFOflOEO DY AFC FCLtC:_5 EEW'N. RED. S. JAMES 8 CO. OF MISSOI IRI, INC. PHONES 816~8d2-66~O~NSAS CITY, MO. 641tl8, ~C'.'•PANIES AFFGROWG CCV°_Rs1GE ' - ~' ~ Insurance Company of forth America -vaa;,r mwAEO ~--Fa ~ Hartford Casualty Insurance Company Roy -c, Daly and Company =Tr~arv `, Onixed Scales Fire Insurance Company 5350 College Boulevard Overland Park, Kansas 66211 ~ ~_;-'Oa"Y FJ •APPNr - 9 TH1515 TO CEDTFY''OT PnL:C'E$CF iRURFNCE LI$TEDEELO`NNAVE 9EEN ISSVEDTOTHEaNSU%ED NAME0606VE FOR iNE pbIMY PERroOtNDICRED. t L71 NOTYIITHST}NCNG my"EDU',!F`dEYL"CP40T CCNbITIC:l OF ANY CCNTRACi CA OTHEROCCUttENi YlRN pf9PECi iJ'dNMH THIS CEpTIFTATE NAY EE 159UEDORNPY"!Ri•.`L iYEIdSUBARCE AfFOROED CY THE POLI<IESOESCnIaEb FEftElfl tSSUa/ECTTO}LL iNE tERM$,fXLWalO.YS, AND CONDI• TIONS OF SUCH POLa:ES. t~ ~ -. ~: uv^~s ~^ rv•.a*+' y~ -":'N' `.IIi9'N TNOY9ANOS-~ N°E OF ~hSUeFVCE i POL!GY f.V•,IaER ,: vu vni ~ [a E w¢»~ ~ :UFFO•-__ OCC~'+ GENERAL UADILITY - , ~ is i,:ir ~ S ~ S pp1,IpPEAENSNE EPM I faEwS'.SCPEMi'C';S ~ - n,.l . _ _ . A ',+tmwscr.~fsE n>yap HAB DO 54 32 42A 8-1-84 8-1-85 ' ='CpOC.SCCYPLFTEO CPEPA)4Ni ' ~ ~~~ I Cf,VTWLiO>L ~ '. J:3M1ED151.DDD ~S 1vtl00 I '.OEPE:CE•:1 CC:TATCECBS ~ ~ ( i 'I'pAp)'N -9pPEnN OAIn4F ' 'Ea+l :`JJA/ + ~I I i PEPSONAL ~`UURY ' S 1 OOO f }UTCMOaM1E LIADRITY i.<C N• ' ~" i S ~ .. b e ~ I I - ' ( , . q,a^n .V L 10 ~ I .: an.Ep .ems ' . '. ' ~k,4tim $ 1 ?` {.~ (:~. ;s') 37ABD SB1482 4-1-84 I 4-1-85 }•: :IiY4Fai0 /L':i ~ iiANAGFrv S I '' G.~v E'~~• ..1... T "" upW.Gt I=i UTI I N° '- : L OO ::. + v I C ~ S 1 3 ; ,% i a .Ep I i :: F O ~ • s: ` EXCESS LI}DIUTY ~ ' X: •~E°=L'-a~='•! 523 347 4368 +6-14-84 16-14-85 ~':a ewEO $SF000 i$SY000 ) f 5*VP)TORY .~,. !. . . WCRREdS' CD!1PENSATION ~ ~ $ ~.sui+hu:E.vn /.ND ~ YSHSE.f.]LI:Y LI`.!In . SWLO"ifR9'U.a1LITY i j f $ CSEASE E>SN EpRO°EEI i)TY°R ~ ~ ( , 1 CESL:r- :.O°eP ~t i:'. ..., : ~,., :iN~C'_•~G.FryI ItE••s City of Rancho Cucamonga is an additional Snslrcnd as respents operations of the insured aC Bunridge Pines ill and Sunridge Yinea 02 ~n"~^T~1r-•~.Tr(~.~~'MTV. ~': ~.r-n:T~Man~~_~~'.. ~.+~TT, y;yF.~rTw)^,Y~. .JUwi..'~.~.:T.n:E! -:4'7L~' ~~i.-...~. l'.tifvs:.r.. w..+..r... .c.~"Li5' "1+411n,}~m~ 'a" CiC Of Rancho Cucamon a x°CULD AiIY°.~P°ADOVE OESMIEEO POLICIES FE CANCEILEp C_FC~PR iMF. iY. Y B %1! ]L 'll;. T:: N pTE "vl[OP.DF. TNF. ISSUING CD•.1MNY Wlll Rancho CUCa(EOngdY Caliiornla '.IML 30 `.}YS Y'WIT*YV NOT•C?tO THE CERTIFICATE I IO LOER RAAIEO TO THE ~ f , IEfT ~Hx%%Xxxxxlx %JS%](X1ETS3Y~RI~!2!xY>~, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cxT ---- AbiyF)f~[E~,7EPaESF!: .. ~~t 7 "'"" CID ~..~ ROBERT NEY FELD S,enYn. GrN Yww~/r CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MICNAEL Urretn~ nn sAN ~cnrvwnomo eo. cocw NOrvcw. cwu,. •n ao r. o. nN sv ~A T xOS. EARLS R. ANDERSON REVER LY E. BRADEN VICTOR A. CMERBAK. JR.. FnNen~ CHARLES A. WEST CITY lOF R N C 0 CUCAMONGA December 21, 198A "OMMONITY OEVEI OFMENi DEPT. DEC ~ 1 1984 7i8i9iYI~11i12~1i2i3i4~5 6 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department ~ P. O. Sox E07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mr. John Martin Gentlemen: Roy F. DTly s Company, Developer of Tract No. 11625, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, has deposited with this District a Material • and Labor Band, a Faithful Performance Bond, and a Utilities Improvement Agreement for waterline and sewerline construction. These bonds and agreements are being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. Presently, the sewer and water improvement plans have not been approved. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Betty F~~~ Secretary b • l~ _ Roy E. Daly Construction Corporation December 11, 1984 Lloyd Hubbs, City Rngireer City of Rancho Cucamcn,a ?ost Office Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs, Daly Construction Corporation respectfully requests the annexation nE Tracts 11625 and 11781 into the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District. • If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call at (714) 937-8024. S' cerely ar onn ton Project Manager OC/mm California Olfice (714) 98T•8024 9310 Beaeline • Suite 102 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 81 T30 CITY Oi RAACNO CVCAMON6A INPROYEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT I1fi 25 NN ON ALL MEN ar THESE PRESENTS: That this rgreem enL is made and entered into, fn conformance with the provisions o! the Suhdivis ton Map Act of the State of Callforn i+, and of the +PDticable Or di nantei of the City a/ Rancho Cucamonga, Lal horn ia, a municipal corporation, by and between Bald City, hereinafter referred to as [he City, and Ro E. Dal and hereina ter re er re to as t c eve oper, M(TNESSETN: THAT, NME0.EA5, said Developer desires to de veiap certain real property in said City es shorn on th!! CCandid onalty aPpro ved auhdivision kn pwn ds Tract No. 11fi Yb ~ and M MEREA S, Bald Cif.y has established certain requirements to be met by said Develcper a prerequis tte to approval f said suhd7vlsion generally located at Nmrchweet corner of 19 tgn Street and Hermosa Avenue NOM, THEREFORE, 1t is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1. the Developer hereby agrees to construct at • De ve Taper's espense all improvemen ti described on page 6 here- of within twelve months frog the effECH ve date hereof, 2. ih is a9reem ant shalt be effective an the date of the resolution of [he Council 0/ said City approving this agreement. ibis agreement Snell be in default on the day f011gw- ing Lhe firs[ anniversary date of said aporaual unless an eaten- slon of time has been granted by said Ci[y as hereina/ Cer prpvid- ed, 3. The Oe veloper may request an ex[enslpn pf time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be su bmiC[ed Lo Lhe City in writing hat leis than 30 days before the aspiration date hereof, and shall contain a atatemant of cf rcumstances nece5 sltating the eatenalon of time. the City sh ali Aave [he right [b review the provisions of this agreement, Including [he construction standards, cast estimate, and improvement security, and [a require ad]ui [men is therein if any su bstantf al change has occurred during the term hereof, 4. If the Oeveioper falls or negle<CS to comply with the provisions of th is agreement, the Clty shall nave the right a[ any time to cause said provisipns to be met by any lawful means, and [hereupon recover from the Developer and/or Ais surety the fuli cost end espense incurred. 5. The Deveioper shall provide metered water servita to each lot of said development in accordance with the re9uiattons, schedules, and fees o/ the Cucamonga County Nater OlstritL. 6. the Developer shalt Da responsible for replacement, relpcation, or removal of any tomppnent of any lrrigatian water system In can/tlct with construction of required lmproveaenLS to the sans/action of the City Engineer and tna owner o/ such avatar • aystlm. -1- n~ ~ impr ov ements requi nnC Standard t9Pec if ,cat+°ns aof Y" [a ndard Drawings roved DY a^d 0° file ao the S lmprpv em ant Ptan app tabulated cc of arm toano to the Said improvements are on the off~ce of the C1t Ya EQ 9~pa dr Estimate, hereby in°°rD°r aced the improvement plans Listed [Hereon on the Canitr action responsible for construc- page 6 hereof, as Laken fro hall also b< and the tract py numb er. The Dev<IOp er sot her fncain ee nvfoPeor ka~ref ace drainage. ;ion of any tr an si tionsfor saf etY construct in shall be a5 "coded dUr5n9 peV's!d NOfk boundaries mmissions discovered sneer. Errors or o cav erect Dy the pr ov is ~°al corrected upon the dire C::oo of the City ngc ov erin9 the trig. due to saitl Olen modifications sh phe surety p( this agreement and Secured Dy DY Lp< planned Norks. arms is Shall be Obtained {t Engineer Prior to st arC t?~ g. C°nscrucv on D De observed, er from [he oft ice of to thereon shall pf dust, noise, or Oev elo0 ulations listed control uDlic work; all wen To saf etY Dr ocedures r0 er not ificatiDn wish Lois attention 9 Lne area, and to feiPlure to comply of her nuisance to Oepartmen LS• nalties Provided therefor. utilities a^d C1tuD act to the De val of section shall Dt a ~ er mall De r<iponiiDle for remD Nithin debris from Pop 1'c n9hts of-Nay to g, The Develop {rom work relative all loose rocks and Ge hel°Pment resuitin9 or adjoining said Oe said development. streets mall da ne within aaiCt tY gs Hall hav! the rf 9ht l0, Nork n; the ustif sect delay +^ unj tDe dili9en tlY Dor sued f0 °Nork tie the event of nwrr ed from to complete any and a71 nd axe ense i • lesion, and to recover all cD St a lawful means. com0 and/or his contractor DY any dedica- Developer hall at all times (p 77oN in9P to the 1p er f in said suDidiviaf on, said ll. Said Oeve ees ements work or impr °v em ant Dy Lion of Che streets at anc@ of said tD the traveling t etion and acceD adequate war nin9 existent in said comb ood and ub15c from Courcil, glue 9 dangerous condition Ci tY, of eacn and andr will Protect the traveling p public easement, n ftlons. street or or tlan garb US co d incorP°r at ed on such Oef ect~ve menns, herein 11 improve said Streets not ac tE Pted old Dnti1 the completion of a each of Developer. to De performed, the <nar 9e of said u6 act tp the Page 6 Hall be under any street s ~iL iTSUed i mpr ov em en me aDt oSe all or a portion of closure perm tn< tCmpOr ary sV eat fmtltt DevetoD er Y it is necessary to„e ein agreed condf ti ons contaiin eer'^ wpenever p impr OVements DY the av~rtln9E the co Hatt acts on of t e puDtic [° be planted shall be to De made, required Nork, gr acting 12. parkway trees other improvement De dons as lop er after planting mall diagram planted DY the De Deen completed. witty the planting and clean uP has ip accord once sre<tpr. Ordinance t Developme^t D provided DY Lne City Communi Y all trees aDDr°p ed DY onsiDie for mason[ ai `^e9 guaranteed the Developer offal the attnre u tie the end [anti n9, wnicnever is nce period, or for one year after p planted [n 9 m of Mena all cgndi- later. respons iDle for meetsn9 17. Tne Dev [nap CitYS pursuant Lo toe Subdivision b ons est ablishe0 by P- ~' r • MaD Act, City Ordianc es, and ibis agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all imDrov em en is cans trusted [hereunder until the improvement is accepted /or meinten ante by the L1ty, and no improvement security provided hereinwitA shall De released before such acs eat ante unless oMer wise provided and authorized by the C[fy Council of the City. la. this aGreem<nt shall no[ terminate until the maintenance guar ani ee security hereinafter described has been released by fhe City, or until a new agreement together with [he reooired improvement security has beln submitted t0 [he Ci[y by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution rf [he City Council same has been accepted, and ibis agreement and the improvement security theref pr has been released, 15. The improvement zeturity tp be furnished by the Oevelo per with this agreement shall cons+st of the following and shall be in a farm ac ce ptabie by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 3. A band or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content spec ifie0 by Government Code Section 66409.1. 2. An Improvement Security tnstrument in the form and content specified by the L1[y AtLO rney. 3. A deposit with the C1ty of money or negotiable bonds o/ the kind approved far securing deposits of public monies. B. io secure laborers and mateH almen: L A bond or bantls by one or more duty authorized corporate su reties in the form and content • specified by Government Lode Section 6fi 499.1. 2. Rn Improvement Security Instrument to the form and content specified by the Cify Attorney. 3. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing [. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer co the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the final Map for the seta ing of alt bovndar y, tot Corner, and street Centerline monuments and far furnishing centerline tie notes to the Lily. the amount of the deposit may be any amount cert Hied by the en Df neer or surveyor as acceptable payment to full; or, if no value is submi [tea, Me cash bond shall be as shown an the Construction one Bond Estimate contained herein. Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as pr oce• dare permits after recel pt by the City of the centerline tie notes and wri t[en assurance of payment in full from the engineer ar surveyor, D, ine repaired bones and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement, 16. The Developer warrants that the improvements described in this agreement shall be free from de/ec is in materials and workmanship. AnY and all portions of the improve- ments found to be detective wi Lein one (11 year fallowing the data on which the Improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Oev eloper free of ail charges to [he City, the Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee se aarity in a sum e4ual to ten percent (10%) of th! construction • -3- est+mate or 5200.00, whichever is groat er, to se ea re the /aithf ul performance of level oper's oDliga [ions as described in this para- graph. ?Te maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance ey the 0ev eloper of any oelig a;ipn of the Developer to do specified work with resp ec[ a any parkway maintenance ass es smen[ district. Once the im proven eats nave Deen dCCeDt!] and d 'ildln CEn ant! gudr dntee 5![u rity Ads 0!!n aCCEpt ed ey the Li [y, the other improvement security de scrieetl in this agreement may be r!leased provided that such release ~s otherwise autnori zed DY the $uDd ivisi pn Map Act and any apDi. icable Ci~y Ordinance. 17, T1 at [be Developer shall take out and maintdin sacs public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him dad any cDntr ac [pr or subcontractor perfprming work covered Dy tAis agreement from claims for property 7amages which may arise because of the nature of [he work or from operations under Ihfs agreement, whether Such operations De by himself ar by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone di rec[ly or indirectly employed by said persons, even though such damages De no[ caused by the negiigen ce of the Oev eloper or any coati actor or ;ubcpntractor or anyone employed by Said perspns. The public liability and prop er(y dam ayt insurance shall list the Uay as ad di(on al insured antl directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractprs and his suDcontr acto rs, and all insurance policies issued hereunder shall sp state. Tne minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: • R. Con[r actor's liaell lty insurance providing bodily injury or de atn '~.~dbility limits pf no[ less tha f 300,000 for each Gerson and SI,000, 000 far each accident or occur root e, dad preperty damage liabil- ity limits of not 'ess than 5100,000 for xacA a<ci- dent pr occurrence wttn an aggregate limit pf 5250,000 far claims which may arise from the opera- tions pf the Oev eloper in the performance of [he wprk herein provided, 0. Automobile Liability insurance ccver ing all v eDi<les used in the performance of this agreement providing bodily injury liaeili[y limits pl not leaf than f200,000 for each person and 5700,000 tar e acn accident or occurrence, one property G:m age liability lfmi is of not less than f50,000 for each accident pr occurrence, with an aggregate pt not less than 5100,000 which may arise from the opera- tions of [ne Developer or his Contractor in perf arming ihB work provided far herein. 18. That Oetpre [he eaecuti on of this agreement, the De ve toper shall file with the Lfty a certificate or cert N i<ates pf ipsurdncC COVerfOg [11e Specified infur date. Each fuGh C!rt ifiedt2 shrill Bear rip end0 rfement preClDding [he c anceltati pas, pr reduction in coverage of any policy evidences Oy such cerc if Kate, before the enpiration of thirty (80) dayf after the City shall nave received hall ilcatipn b, registered mail from the ins uran ee carrier. As evidence of understanding t7e provtsipnz contain!d heref n, and of intent [o comply with Same, the Subdivider has fuDmitt ed the fe!Ipwing described imDrovem eat security, and has affi._; his signature here [p: -4- r ~~ e FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE TYOe: Surety Principal Amount: Sa2S,300.00 Ndme dnd dddrl55 pf Silt ety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PATMENT Type: Surety Principal Ampunt: 5312,650.00 Name and address Of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONVMENTAT ION Type: Cash Principal Amount: 5 1,A50.00 Name and address pf surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE type: Principal Amount: Name and address of surety: TD DE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OT THE CITT IN N[TNESS NEREOF, [he parties hereto have caused these presents to he duly exec of ed and acknprledged with all ormalitf es repaired by tar on the dates set forth apposite Meir • signatures. /" r, Date /.Z DY a _. ~~ IYI ~ ,Developer r• i9natu re' '.1 Rp E. Dal Jr. / may,, q r m/e~ Date / y / Oy O/lu.. ~6.t.W a++LS- Oeve caper rrr!!!-$,gnatu r~ Mar Ellen Dal r me A«epLed: City of 0.ancho Cucamonga, Califprnla A Munfcipal Corporation gy; Ma ypr At[es t: styJ ¢rk r ' ADOroved: ~ ~ OEYELOP EA'S SIGN AT URE MUST BE NOTARIZED -S- • a~µ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR • ~ EMG[NEERIgG OIVI SI CN ENCAOACHMEIR PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE Far Improvtment: _ 19<1 6 He: vosa (Off-Tract) Tract 11615 OatC 9i5 '9a Ompute y: pandv >~a ri File Referrnce: City Orari ng p. NOTE: Goes mt iM lode current fee for •ritiny perwit or pareeaent depos5ts QUANTITY UNIT ITEM PA iCE AMOUNT 32B L.F. P,C.C, curb - 32^ C.F. 24• gutter 1.25 2,J>e ~~ L.F. P.C.C. curb - 0• C.G. 24• gutter 6.00 y ~yp 1G3 L.F. p,C,C_ curb only Itransicio ns7 5.50 ~ - L.F. A.C. Eerm 4.50 3-663 S.F. 4• P.C.C. sideralk 1.75 2 5 4 936 S.F. Drive approach * ramps 2.50 - -j~y-p- 12a S.F. B" P. C.C, crass gut ter (inc. curb) 3,40 ;6Z C.Y. Street excavation 1.50 [.Y. Imported em0an kmen[ 1.50 109.200 S.F. Preparation of sucgrade 0.15 T6Tdi!•- 24.9^9 S. F. Crushed agg. case (per inch thick) 0.03 750 TOn A.C. (over 1700 tans) 27.00 TON p,C. (900 to IJ00 tons) 35.00 i0N A.C. (500 to 900 font) 45.00 TON A.C. (under 500 tone) 60,00 24 9_99 S.F. A.C. (3• thick) 0.55 l3.ia9 _ S.F. Patch A.C. (french) 1.75 ~ S.F. 1• thick A.C. overlay (Feather] 0.30 Z.LZS- 2 EA. gdjus: serer manhole to grade 250.00 -~00 EA. Adjust sewer clean out to grade 150, 00 ~- EA, qdj use rater vat vez to grade 15.00 ~- B EA. Street lighcz 1000.00 p.000 • L.F. Ba•rtcades (intersec. 5500 min) 1.00 L.F. 2 x 4' redhaad hex^er 1.75 9_y 70]0 S.F. Removal of q.C, paveaent c e.^c 0.55 5.250 616 L.F. 0.emoval 01 p,C. C. comb (uaP ? 3.30 2,031 L.F. Removal o/ A.C. berm 1.00 l EA. S[ree[ signs 200,00 -660- _ EA. Reflectors and posts 35.00 L.F. Concrete block call 25,00 S.F, Ret of ning call 20,00 -STr'D- TON Aggregate base 7.00 i 700 ~- C.Y. L.f, Concrete Structures f~k ra~n~47.a lB^ RCP (2000 0) 200. oo 29.00 260 000 -11 3fiu L.F. 24^ RCP (1500 0) 35.00 L.F. ]6" 0.CP (2000 O) 49.00 l.F. 48" qCP (1200 0) 76.00 EA. Cat cn basin N 4' 2000.00 ~- FA. [atcn basin W 6' 2900.00 T966- EA, Catch basfn V 22' x500.00 Fp. Local depression 4' 500.00 1 EA. Local depression 12' 1000.W ~:,-06'6' 1 Ep, Junc[lan structure 5000.00 5,000 1 EA. Outlet structure, Std t50fi 1500.00 l 500 -T ER. Outlet structure, S[d 1507 500.00 -`5'O6~ q EA. Guard poste 40,00 --SS- L.F. Guard panel (road) 25.00 6s _ L,F, 5arcut 2.00 _ ER. Neadrell (48" ring) 4000.00 L.F. Redrood header ;, 15 S.f. Landicap;ng 6 Irrf gation 2.75 ~ L.f. Roll curb (P.[,C.) 7.50 -189' 4 EA. Relocace Potter Pole ]000.00 12,000 • ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEf SUB TOTAL 369 85l •RE STORATION/Off INEAT ION CASH /Seco CONTINGENCY CO5T5 (i5i) 5 DEPOSIT (A EFUNOABLE) F~.NFUL PERFORMANCE BONG 11001) -d3i~3J~ MONUMENTAT ION SURETY (USN) f a1f0 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (501) aPursuant to CItY o/ Nancho Cucalewi9a MuolclPel Cab, Tlt le I, Chapter 1.OB, adppttig in IRnardtno County Cade Titles, CMpters 1-5, a ush restoration/dellneatlan deposit iM11 M ~aG prior to IssuaMe oT N En9lnee~~onstrtN:ttan Pen4ft. ,~--yy INTERNq TIGNgL BANKING OIV 1510N ~~ ~L.1' VO. Bor ,7100, Los Ang/es, bli/omia 90051 ^ v.o. 4ox 455aD, San F.Wmltto, Qn/omb B4 r4s ORIGINAL !CM/e Addrea: "UN/ONBANK"Telex 674511) DATE IIECEMBER 19.19 NUM9ER Of.l}'S V iNG 9gNK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 OASELINE ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGAI CA 917371 GENTLEMEN: WE HEREBY AUTHORIZE YOU TO DRAW ON OURSE LV E$ fOR ACCOUNT Of ROY E. DRLY1 JR. AND MARY ELLEN DALY 5350 COLLEGE ROAD1 OVERLAND PARK1 KANSgS 66211 UP TO THE AGGREGATE gMOUNT OF FOUR HUNDReU TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($ 4251300.00) AVAILABLE BY YOUR DRAFT AT SIGHT TO BE ACCOMPANIED EV THE FOLLOWING OOCUMENT~. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT OF $4251300.00 REFERS TO THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE OF THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AS OUTLINED IN THE ATTACHED CONSTRUC- TION AND BONG ESTIMATE ON A PROJECT IN RANCHO CUCAMONCR KNOWN AS TRACT 11625 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINOI STATE OF CALIFORN IAI ACCORDING • TO THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 191 1904 BETWEEN THE CITY , ., OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA AND ROY E. DALY 8 COMPANY . THIS LETTER OF CREDIT WILL EXPIRE EITHER UPON DISBURSEMENT OF THE `_..)' $4251300.00 TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONCA OR UPON COMPLETION AND '~;'.~ ACCEPTANCE 8Y THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR OF THAT PORTION OF THE AFOR EMENTIONEO WORK SECURED BY THIS INSTRU MENTI OR IN NO EVENTI LATER THRN JUNE 151 1986. :/:. ~ ~ } fl. IRI~~ R. 9~ DRgFTS UNDER THIS CREDITHUST BE MARKED "DRAWN UNDER" UNION BANK, L~ LOS ANGELES ^ SAN FRANCISCO,g pppppppp; }~ CALIFORNIA CREDIT NO. 4$D/152B9 DgreD DECEMBER 191 198 4AND PRESENTED AT OUR OFFICEEEQ~^A~ NOT LATER THAN JUNE 151 1986 AT 8:00 P.M. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT MUST ACCOMPANY DRAFT AND DOCUMENTS PRESENTED TO UB FOR PAYMENT. ~ ~ 6 9:a XlAkdkkkiNtkJ4JCk k>YP15k9tkJ(3BIAX7dl%IYikdtrlYJDltr)63tIU6YdhX%d(Y41Dt'IUkuCktlWclMl)kttWX %rYdtdNU{ifd(~JbkIXX ~~~ bbkON1EY~IXAR1YNcgk1YIX9;Jl96X NCN191dIrAXrThlEhd4WXdPM~Y1CpANXdFR bK kdhlNElikSld~dEJtdDA AAAIIDI". ~~ WE HEREBY UNDERTAKE TNAT ORAfT50RAWN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TFRMS Of THE CREDIT WILL BE DULY §" HONORED BV US. %~%RA~4MK%JGX:A%gI0g6%n%OQ71~OW%0(rXONMpkHIA%941IF7t ~ UNION BANK ' 10R k9tBORIXgMF~AR J1aCTAVAX R920WN110VR9PR1<~ 11~c~.J ,vlNellptc auK . ~ .r "z,~,:xa xoau;;o n~ ~ ~.• ~ E~ l~ L V1nuBI,.C .LKAtVII. , _.. ,..,I(INTE RNATIDN 4L BANNING DIVISION ^ UNION. LJ P.O. Box J100, Los Ange/es, Gli/ornia 90051 F'J 'a"` ORIGINAL / P, D. Box 05500. San Francuo, Cahlornu 94145 (UD/a AdCrea; "UNIONBANK"TNea 6745IY1 DATE DECEMBER 19.1984 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA 9320 BASELINE ROAD RANCHO CUCpMONCAr CA 91330 GENTLCMEN: I WE HEREBY AUTHOfl IZE VOU TO DRAW ON OURSELVES FOR ACCOUNT OF ROY E. DALYr JR. AND MARY ELLEN OALY S3S0 COLLEGE RORDr OVERLAND PARKr KANSAS 66211 UP TO THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF TWO HUNDRED TWELVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FIFTY AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($ 212 ,650.00) ' AVAILABLE BV YODR DRAFT AT SIGHT TO BE ACCOMPANIED BV THE fOILOWING DOCUMENT. '" THIS LETTER OF CREDIT OF $212 ,650.00 REFERS TD THE LABOR AND MATERIAL TD BE UT ILI2ED IN THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AS OUTLINED IN THE ATTACHED CONSTRUCTION AND BOND ESTIMRTE ON A PROJECT 1N RANCHO ' CU CAMONGA KNOWN AS TRACT 11625 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD INOr STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 19. I j• 1984 BETWEEN THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONCA AND ROY E. DALY A COMPANY. THIS LETTER Of CREDIT WILL E%PIRE EITHER UPON DISBURSEMENT OF THE $212 ,650 .00 TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OR UPON COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OF THAT PORTION DF THE Af OR EMENTIONED WORK SECURED BY THIS INSTRU MENTr OR IN NO EV ENT, LATER THAN JUNE 15r 1986. • j~i ~y~ DRAFTS UNDER THIS CREDIT MUST BE MARKED "DRAWN VNDER" UNION @AN K, C]I LOS gNGELES ^ SAN FRANCISCO ~ O. CALIFORNIA CREDIT NO, 4SD/1S29D pATFp DECEMBER 19r 1984AND PRESENTED A70UR OFFICE~~ NOT IATFR THAN JUNE 15r 1986 AT G:OD P.M. a $a THIS LETTER Of CREDIT MUST ACCOMPANY GRAFT AND DOCUMENTS PRESENTED TO US FOR PAYMENT. y~~ X114L'W4i~>~ifJfJ5~Cd61614~s`4KJI~Fd4KL16'SYflf3(~SiF%313Wi7EYciINdtYf7fEX'blYl%didF$dJF#WtN%71rJ6Yi114kJfY~IdWF761hXX 3°~~ bbd4MlExkARYxhkd4i;-0Gkd6X gdldWid>x YnAkdtrYaal'dNMk kJIdlJWtp bKd(dNNEbtld(dlYdlltxkdDN bbAbDl°. WE HEREBY UNDERTAKE THAT DRAFTS DRAWN IN COMPLIANC ITH THE TERMS OF THE CREDIT Wlll BE OULV HONOREp BY US. $ xxxawvxNxxwxAdExxuwoxlwtacz~wllwcsfxscllEU 7 ~ bxxAldb%IwN>aFxbKxddpWbll4RfAFIYkMdIAK0. UNION BANK~~~I1~ /~•. y~ p~ _ AVfNOllli/Y .IYIIa1V N[ TrN •"4~ 2'J {y't1V •r TNeauao nanervN~ RESOLUTION N0. iG7.~92~9PR 8S-G13 A RESOLUTION OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, RND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 11625 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 11625, consisting of 5 lots, submitted by Roy E. Oaly, Construction, Subdivider, located at the Northwest corner of 19th and Hermosa has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dy said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City. together with good and sufficient improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedlcation for public use the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor fs authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on i e s, ayor ATTEST; Bever y A. Put a et, ity erk jaa o! 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT • GATE; January 2, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Consultant Contract with Derbish, Guerra and Associates for the design of Archibald Avenue Storm Drain and Street Reconstruction from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street. Contract not to exceed 515,000.00. Attached, is an agreement for Consultant Services for the design of the above subject project. Said services will include preliminary survey and design for the removal and reconstruction of the east side of Archfha ld from Leman Avenue to Banyan Street and portions of the west side of Archibald Avenue from approximately 600 feet north of Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street; and, extension of a portion of the Master Plan Storm Brain from Banyan Street south alcng Archibald Avenue and thence easterly to the Alta Loma Channel. This project will be performed with Tract No. 12523, far which Derbish, Guerra and Associates acted as Engineers. RECOMMENDATION It is recamnended that City Council approve the attached agreement awarding the design services for the above described Droject to Derbish, Guerra and Associates and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement, and authorize funding from the Gas Tax and Systems Development funds in an amount not to exceed 115,000.00 Respectfully sub fitted, LB :B :k~ Attachments r~ • AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT ;Fk'%ICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 2nd day of January, 1985, between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Derbish, Guerra & Associates, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City desires to prepare designs, construction plans, specifications and cost estimates for Archibald Avenue Street Reconstruction from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street and Extension of the portion of the Master Plan Storm Brain Line 4-Br from Banyan to Miller ditch hereinafter referred to as "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has the necessary skills and qualifications and licences required by law to perform the services required under this Agreement in connection with said Project; and WHEREAS, the City desires to retain the Consultant for services hereinafter described in connection with said Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of January, 1985, authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties that: 1. DEFINITIONS. As used in this Agreement, the following definitions shall be applicable: a. Consultant. Consultant shall mean Derbish, Guerra & Associates, Inc. a California Corporation located at 124 East "F" Street, • Suite 12, Ontario, CA 91764. -1- ~~ b. City. City shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation, located at 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. c. City Council. City Council shall mean the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d. Services. Services shall mean the services to be performed by the Cuns~ltant pursuant to this Agreement. e. Satisfactory. Satisfactory shall mean satisfactory to the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform for, and furnish ta, the City the services described in Exhibit A, "Scope of Services" attached hereto. 3. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. The Consulant agrees that it shall • delingently and responsibly pursue the performance of the services required of it by this Agreement and that said services shall be completed within 45 working days after execution of this Agreement in accordance with the Project Schedule attached hereto as Exh ibi[ B. If a delay beyond the control of the Consultant is encountered, a time extension may be mutually agreed upon in writing by the City and the Consultant. The Consultant shalt present documentation satisfactory to the City to substantiate any request for a time extension. 4. PAYMENT. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, upon satisfactory completion of the services described in the "SCOPE OF SERVICES", (Exhibit A) the Consultant shall be compensated based upon the actual time spent on the Project at the Consultant's standard hourly • -2- 31 rates attached hereto as Exh Shit C, plus outside services, but shall not exceed a total amount of $15,000.00, In the event of authorization, in writing, by the City of changes from the work as indicated in Exhibit A or for other written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated herein, add iLional compensation sha',l ne allowed for such extra work hosed upon the Consultant's standard hourly rates (See Exhibit C). The Consultant shall submit invoices which specify the area where work was comp feted and the associated time for completion to Che City for approval. The Consultant agrees to invoice the City for services rendered not more often than once a month. Work performed at the request of the City, outside the limit specified in this Agreement, is to be designated as "Extra • Work" on monthly invoices. Work performed in connection with an authorized written change order will 6e so designated on said invoice. 5, CITY SUPPORT. The City Shall provide the following items of support to the Consultant: a. Provide a staff engineer to work with the Consultant for the purpose of giving advice and to provide coordination within the scope of this Agreement. b. Make available and provide all existing data and information relevant to the proposed Project. t. Provide all right-af-way negotiations. d. Provide enviranmentai processing. e. Provide traffic index. f. Provide plans and specifications for bidding. g. Prepare and mail final utility notice. -3- 7 n J 6. SUSPENSION, TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving a written notice upon the Consultant at least fifteen (15) days prior to termination. Upon receipt of said notice, the Ccnsu pant shall inonediate ly cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days of service of said notice, the City shall pay to the Consultant all earned and unpaid fees and costs based upon the rates attached hereto as Exhibit C, plus outside services, but the sum so paid shall not exceed a dollar figure which bears the same proportionate relationship to E15,000.00 as the quantity of work completed by the consultant bears to 100X of the work prescribed herein. If ih? City s~~snends, terminates or abandons a portion of this • Agreement such suspension, termin atf an or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. 7. BREACH OF CONTRACT. If the Consultant defaults in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of written notice of such default in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstandfng any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all • original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of -4- 33 providing the services Lo be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of ,the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. 9. tNOEPENOENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at att times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the Cdnsultant~s officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. 10. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect • those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Rgreement. The Consultant shalt at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, tts orncers and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 11. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the Derformance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any moneys due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. 12. INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain general 1l ability and workers compensation insurance coverage effective on the first day of work and in full force throughout the full term of this Agreement. The policy or policies Shall be underwritten by insurers admitted to operate in the State of California, on forms no less broad in the scope of coverage than standard forms. -5- 3'~ Entire limits of liability maintained must be certified but in no event shall limits he less than Specified hereinhe low. Any aggregate limitation of liability shall be separate as to the risks ari sing out of the subject matter of this proposal. Coverage Minimum Limit Workers' Compensation & Employer's Liahility 5100,000.00 Comprehensive General Liability/Comprehensive E500,000.00 Auto Liability Comh fined single limit each occurance tf requested, the Consultant agrees to deposit with the City, certificates of insurance to satisfy the City Lhat insurance re quirements of this Agreement have been compiied with, and to keep such insu rance in effect and the certificates therefore on deposit with the City during the entire term • of this Agreement. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto and supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. r 1 U -6- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to L J he executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA on Mt a s, Mayor Date: ATTEST: every Authe et, tty erk CONSULTANT '~,~1'JIS~1 GyE~- i .Q~ec. ~M. By: "t Title: Ryee'tv•euT APPROVED AS TO FORM: By tty ttarney Date: '~- 36 PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES ARCHIBALO AVENUE STREET RECONSTRUCTION - LEMON AVENllE TO BANYAN STREET EXTENSION OF MASTER PLAN STOIUI GRAIN LINE 4-Br EXHIBIT ".';' SCOPE OF WORK/ENGINEERING FE6 Scope of Work Project consists of preliminary survey and design of the following improvements: 1. Removal and reconstruction of [he east side of Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue [o Banyan Street. 2. Removal and reconstruction of po rtiona of Che west side of Archibald Avenue from approximately • 600 feet north of Lemon Avenue [o Banyan Street. 3. Storm drain improvements Erom the exis [ing pro- posed terminus at approximately 150 fees east of Archibald Avenue pec Tract 12523 drawing No. 885 westerly to Archibald Avenue, northerly on Archibald Avenue [c Banyan Street, westerly on Banyan Street to Jadeite Street and northerly cn Jadeite Street as necessary to intercept full tributary 100 year flows. Esrimared Eneineerina Fee The not to exceed Engineering Fes for [he work as noted above Sa $15,000.00 (fifteen thousand dollars). Actual cost will be de- termined by multiplying the appropriate schedule as attached (EXHIBIT "C") by the number of hours worked. Blueprinting and reproduction cost, if Incurred by the Engineer will he added at cost plus 15X. 37 PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES ARCHIBALD AVENUE STREET RECONSTRUCTION - LEMON AVENUE TO BANYAN STREET EXTENSION OF MASTER PLAN STORM DRALN LINE 4-Br EXHIBIT "e" SCHEDULE OF IJORK The estimated time for completion on the prof ecc is as follows: WarkinR Days 0 - Award of Contract/Nocice to Pcoceed 5 - Preliminary Survey Completed 10 - 15 - • 20 - Preliminary Design Comple [e/Set Up Deeign Meeting 25 - 70 - 35 - Submittal of Final Design Far Plan Check 40 - Plan Check Corrections 45 - Final Design Completed • 38 D E R B I S H G U E R R A & A S S O C I A T E S I N C. CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS • 11• EAST "F" STREET, SUITE IS • ONTARIO. CA LI!'O RNIA 9i'!6/ T19 ~ 9!J-S]]O lH - 9!]d )J9 - EXHIBIT "C" 1/83 ST:1H0.1RD HOURLY RACES PRINCIPAL ENGINEER $ 72.00 per hour PROJECT P4INAGER $ 64.00 per hour DESIGNER $ 50.00 per hour ~RAPTS;NN $ 43.00 per hour P REPdRAT ION/RESEARCH $ 46.00 per hour 2 >L1i7 SURVEY CREW $107.00 per hour 3 iWN SURVEY CREW $132.00 per tour CLERICAL $ 22.00 per hour INSPECTION/CONSTRUCTION SOPERVIS ION $ 37.00 per hour Above rates include mil eage, equipment and l.ns [rumen[s, use of office space and ma [eriala and supplies. U • 3~i ~~CALtO.Yr ~9, ., ~~, C1'fY ~F gpNCHO CU~~'i80NGA ~~ STAFF R,EpORT <~I ,~ ~`,F Y ' Z -- -1 January 2, 1985 I DP1'E: city Manager City Council and Engineer TO' Nubbs, Dity for Floyd B• t Civil Engineer contract FBOM: to Pssistan award then Under 9r°und Richard Co City Council Lions from Church By: ded that th of Service Connec Avenue Dewco recommen rounding Archibald bidder, it is Onder9 2adt tUoD#~„e lowest responsible amount of SUBJECT: Electrical at the contract Util itY D~gyse Line Ro execution of the contract Street to 10% for contin9encies• and authorize 516,520.00 Plus Clerk of the Cit SunenarY ice 21, 1984 in Me °f Attached is a anal hill Dec roP existing led was re°P ived andereeceived10.ThePEn97heerPn9 p5edfc of act t bid ened P Sea ubliclY roP°s aL and accePtable• roan and onversion include and was P the bi t Pcorrec• for the under9 shall a met of lation of fuse panels. the bid and finds articiPatjOn connections ions. The use The service switch aund convey this Proj the CiCY s P icdl ect. • entail electr boxes.. under9ro a for homeof junct~ CopcomP1ete said sourc overhead 11 be the revenue installation ,.essaryding sha modifications ne. 15 Dpp •00. City Beautification fun ect contract to En9~neer s estimate 15 $ subj above of the cif award the on the attached summary NECOM~ENDAt10N ended that the CitYDe,°xfeceived~nandaa~ horlpx forec°°nt~n9encies. It is recbm^esPtheible biddeosal 516, eted. the lowest bid Prof of 520a asPbud9 of contract amount ati°n Fun contrytionat the the Beautific ct drawn from Funds L0 be d y ,; `~^, tfully subm)tte , {tesp f ~/~ r~~ ~~ b ~' ~BC:k //i pttbchments ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMWRY OF PROPOSALS OPENED ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: 514,600.00 GATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1984 CONTRACT NO.: 21-4647-8136 PROJECT: Electrical Undergrounding of Service Connections in Underground Utility District No. 2 (UUDA2) LOCATION: Rrchiba ld Avenue from Church Street to Baseline Road N A E ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION (UNIT ITEM N0. QUANTITY PRICE IN HORDS) UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 25 16" X 24" X 6" Pull-Box 5353.00 58,825.00 (with required conduit/wire) 2 1 Combination Service Closure- 5475.00 53,325.00 Meter Sockets (with required conduit/wire) 3 14 Grounding Installation E 70.00 5 980.00 4 Lump Sum Six (6) Junction Boxes (with 51,140.00 required conduit/wire) (box sizes to be determined in field) 5 Lump Sum Removals 5 700.00 6 Lump Sum Cutting & Patching 51,150.00 7 Lump Sum Clearfng d Grubbing/Clean Up E 400.00 TOTAL BID SIXTEEN THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY AND NO/100 DOLLARS in wor s TOTAL BID 516,520.00 (in figures) • • C~ ~/ /.TT V lT L1 D A fill. V A !.T T/~ A TllTfill~ A STAFF REPORT ~r DATE: January 2, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Bids for Ten (10) Vehicle Mobil Radios °; ~ It ~, Ili 19ii Two bids were received on December 20, 1984, for purchase of ten (10) vehicle mobile radios (see attached). Mobil Communications Service of Los Angeles placed a bid for a Midland Brand radio and Comm-Ser Enterprise of Rancho Cucamonga bid Standard Brand radios. Although Mobile Communications bfd is substantially lower, four points must 6e considered: \J 1. The City's current fleet is made up of General Electric and Standard radios. Standardizing the fleet will mean lower maintenance cost as the fleet grows. 2. Midland radios, as bid, do not meet the specifications for rated power supply to operate (a less than fully charged vehicle battery will not operate the radio) and second they lack a second tone board for allowing screening of vehicle to vehicle transmisstion from the base stations. 3. Cost to have the radios installed in Los Angeles will require approximately E1,400.00 in transportation costs to deliver the vehicles to and from Los Angeles. Plus, any additional work that might be needed under the first year of warranty. 4. Finally the City receives 1X sales tax back for using a local vendor. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above, it is recommended that Council award the bid for ten (10) mobile vehicle radios to Comm-Ser Enterprises, Rancho Cucamonga, for a total purchase price of E9,283.00. u Respectfully submj~tted, ~' `~~~ ~ LBH• :bc ~~ O w z U' W 2 d £O O Q H U J O 6 U VI O O d x O U d' 2 1 Q z w W O O T C } Q nri f U N Q ~ ~ 0 0 N 2 N r .-1 U W r H 2 Q O O U N W N L O O O S N S S Z 0 0 0 0 L ~ OOOOt~Im NObO 1~1 U! O N N ul to m m N .O 1~ Y'f (O V £ t.1N G'OQ1ll V)rl 1~ N C Q w r LO (O q L N N O O O S S E O O • . E O m ¢l I(f V) f~1 ul n 1I'1 N b A A 1~ U 1~ i ? 01 (+IN UINM OSOS I~1 N ~J .C r b 0 O.-1 v1 0 N 0 .~1 N O .4 C .--~ G7 I~ Vl b t'J b off O Q£ n.--i m.--~ fn ~n a.-~ u fV ~ e e ~ 0 U i- A V .ti O O bm1~ OSO n o ~ m ~ rbi vNi ui .ri vi I b blob W ~ oab nN.. z ti a a o ~ a m c z m c o n: c N Z' N N A-. d O A C C ~ JL Q N pCQ a .N N6 Lm E N N y E N d A _ +Il J lei ~ N 6 O! M H A y GI N m ~t~~+ v LmL3~ O L 3 ~+ O C U VI c L r a w r N C ~ K ~ N m W O ~~ N N O L W= C O N W =rWVloru ~p ulroW ~ rr. p r N m p JrIN ("1Q^~ Jr1NM~ r Q VINO ~ O //~ • u I ENGINEERING DIVISIO.! 9340 BASE LINE, SUITE B RANCHO CUC{4MONGA, CR 91701 City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Honorable Council: In accordance with the established specifications, the undersigned bidder agrees to provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 'dith ten (10) each low band, FM, Two Way Mobile Radios at the following price, including sales tax. A.) low Banu, FM, Two 'day Radio Units 1.) Ten (10) each mobile radios 5 571.69 z 10 = 5 5,716.90 (Includes all components less antenna/). 2.) Four (4) each loaded antenna 5 36.89 xq = S 147.36 3.) Six (6) each whip antenna S 52.71 z 6 E 316.26 SUB TOTAL = 5 6.180.52 Sales Taz = 5 370.8;} TOTAL COST (Item A) = f 6.51.35 B.) Labor for Installation ^/ 1.) Seven (7) Ea. onto Chevy 5-10 Blazers 56.00 x19'= 5 455.00 2.) Two (2) Ea. onto Chevy 3/4 ton Pickups $5.00 x 2 = 5 130.00 • 3.) One (1) Ea. onto Mobile Street Sweeper $5.00 x 1 = $ 65.00 TOTAL COST (Item B) = S 650.00 GRAND TOTAL =' S 7,201.35 (Items R & B) STATE M11KE AND MODEL FOR RADIO UNIT & COMPONENTS Make Ni.dland Model 70-0506 w/70-2102,70-2191,70-2195 MHIP ANTENNA Make Antenna Specialists Model ASPA 268 LOADED ANTENNA Make~ntenna Specialists Model Abp 63 L APPRO%IMATE DELIVERY TIME 30 CALENDAR GAYS v~Q~ ICE A~ORd$OSO_11.11svb~L- '~' / ~~ ,/ ~~ - Los Angeles, CA 90040 :~ Gene R. 'a tin, Vice President N ~~ . ENGINEERING DI VIS [Oi! 9340 BASE LINE, SUITE B RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9i 730 Honorable Council: In accordance with the established specifications, the undersigned bidder agrees to provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga, with ten (10) each low band, FM, Two Way Mobile Radios at the following price, including sales tax. A.) Low Band, FM, Two 'day Radio Units 1.) Ten (10) each mohile radios E 77?.i)0 x 10 = S 7,J„7, pp (Includes all components less antenna) 2.) Four (4) each loaded antenna S 55.0o x ~'~ . S z'^.oo 3.) Six (6) each whip antenna E 75.np x 6 = $ :.>;;,~~ SUB TOTAL = E ~,ni^.^n Sales Tax = 5 ~. iJ.~;o TOTAL COST (Item A) _ _ 5,551, ;7n \J B.) Labor for Installation 1.) Seven (1) Ea. onto Chevy 5-10 Blazers 5 75.00 x m 7 = E szs,00 2.) Two (2) Ea. onto Chevy 3/4 tan Pickups S ';_oo x 2 = 5 L50.oo • 3.) One (1) Ea. onto Mobile Street Sweeper 5 7_.Cr, x 1 b 75.n0 TOTAL COST (Item B) s 150.00 GRAND TOTAL = f ~,?~S.cO (Items A & B) STATE MAKE AND MODEL FOR RADIO UNIT 6 COMPONENTS MHIP AIITENNq LOgOEO ANTENNA Make standard Model 7GGL15 Make Antenna Special Ls is MedeI.ASPGJI Make An to nna Specia Liscs Model .~sP; V 7 APPROXIMATE DELIVERY TIME 1o CALENDAR DAYS Cnn~-;zr En to rcrises nL55 drehiSaLd AveAv= 5~[e lUl I ,s~~ A~N[h] war lw/~~,~~ Cuca:non.a, Cn. '11150 (7t») ~a7-ao to • n ~5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT • • BATE: January 2, 1985 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: 1984-85 HOUSING REPAIR/REHABILITATION LOAN CONTRACT WITH AN 8 RN O N C UN Y BACKGROUND: Since 1982, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has contracted with the County of San Bernardino to administer the Housing Repair/Rehabilitation Laan Program funded under the Community Development Block Grani Program. The County ev alu ate5 loan and grant applications, performs home repairs, and coordinates rehabilitation loans, as required under the Federal regulations for rehabilitation programs supported 6y Block Grant funds. The contract in the amount of EBB,Q00 extends the terms of the existing agreement through June 30, 19d5. RECOMMENOAT tON: It fs recommended ty of Rancho Cucamonga and the continue the implementation of the Program 6e approved. Res ^c fuliy ~ubmitted: _ ~~~ ~~icl('~Gomei /City Planner that the contract between the County of San Bernardino to Housing Repair/Rehabilitation RG:ns Attachment: Contract -[ COUNTY USE ONLY ~ ~ COUNTY OF SAN (1E RNAROINO • a~+b+ ~-",~' CONTRACT TRANSMITTAL Office of Community .-, -_ Connie Chambers pn, F,,. 2563 aue,p[t Vnlt Np. $~i V~UVi[C[Np. Gimp yV. JoF NO, gmpun~pl Canira[i 020 2230 155 88,000 o.p,[n wm[ [man pn[ wm~[n, pi [.c~ p,. Rancho Cucamonga ~pm~rz re~aMnow~np e.vmmn a,~~m.n N/A Housing Assistance Pro ra qpO,puma,. q~nopp~tp[N Contractor: - City of Rancho Cucamonga Birth Date Federal ID No. or Social Security No, 9B-3217002 121900 Contractor's Representative: Ot[o Kroutil Address: 9320 Baseline Road, P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamon a CA phone: (714) 98901851 Nature of Contract: !Brie/ty describe (he Ben<ral terms o~Me con tract) This contract provides for the Coun[y of San Bernardino to implement a housing preservation program Eor the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The program consists of a Home Repair program far Senior CS [izens and disabled persona and a Rehabili- tation Loan program. • to nyp/pVW M,O LF9FI FO,m n~ ,/ Cpunh cmm.~ ~---. Dori on the "Standard Conyact" n f0 Tlli,m.pv. 4clmn .p, •[ppn.mp nO.ntr .1em,nn Vgp4cLo om C u i. T k A C T • THIS AGREEMENT is mane and entered into this 1st day Of July, 1984, by ono between the COUNTY CF SAN BERNARDINO (herei r,a fter referred to as "COUNTY") and the CITY CF RANCHO CUCANONGA (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, bath COUNTY and CITY are eligible to apply for grants from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, pu rsuan i. to the provisions oi- the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and WHEREAS, both COUNTY and CITY have been approved for funding in the farm of a Community Development Block Grant under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, for the program year beginning July 1, 1984, and ending June 30, 1985; and WHEREAS, both CCUNTY and CITY have each developed a community development plan pursuant to Title I of the Act that includes a Housing Program that will help meet the housing assistance needs of lower income persons residing in their respective jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the Office of Cormunity Development (hereinafter referred to as "OCD"), as the COUNTY entity responsible far administering the Federal Community Development Block Grant Contract and CITY desire to coordinate their efforts to • maximize utilization of personnel and resources and increase the efficiency and eccnomics in administering their Housing Assistance Program. NOW, THEREFORE, COUNTY AND CITY for and in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements herein contained do agree as follows: I. This Agreement is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 1, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title I of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Sectien 65GG), relating to the joint exercise of powers common to public agencies. The purpose of the Agreement is to utilize OLD'; repair crews to make repairs on and for Rancho Cucamonga senior and handicapped and disabled hcmeowners as part of the CI1'Y's Housing Program. 2. The CITY hereby authorizes the COUNTY to utilize and assume responsibility for COUNTY work crews to accomplish essential repairs on housing units of homeowners in the CITY of Rancho Cucamonga who qualify for Senior Repair grants under Lhe CITY's Community Development Block Grant program guidelines as administered by the COUNTY. For the purpose of this program the cities housing program guidelines are the same as the County's 3. a. COONTY shall act as the agent for the CITY in all matters related to assessing, estimating, assigning, and effecting all repair work to be conducted as part of Lhe C[TY's Senior Home Repair Program antl Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program. • ~IU -1- • b. Each party agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the other party from any and all claims losses and damages occurring or resulting from any negligent or wrongful act or omission of its officers, agents or employees in the performance of this contract. c. The County-shall indemnify and hold harmless City against any liability claims, losses, demands, and actions incurred by City as a result of determination by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development that activities undertaken by County under the program or programs failed to comply with any laws, regulations or policies applicable thereto or that any funds billed 6y and dishursed to the County under this agreement were improperly expended. 4. The terms of this agreement shall become effective on the date mentioned above and shall continue in full force and effect during the CDBG Program year, beginning July I, 1964 and ending June 30, 1985 or until conclusion of the program; in any event either COUNTY or CITY may terminate this program relationship by giving the other party a written notice 30 calendar days before termination is to take effect. 5, a. COUNTY agrees to process to completion a minimum of nine (9) Housing Rehabilitation Loans. 6. COUNTY agrees to perform all necessary work to complete minimum of twenty-one (21) Senior Home Repair program grants. • c. COUNTY administrative costs shall not exceed 25% of the program funding. Administrative costs shall include but not necessarily limited to: grant and loan processing, legal fees, title reports and supplies. In no event shall administrative costs exceed $1,000 per Housing Rehabilitation loan and $500 per Senior Home Repair grant. d. COUNTY and CITY declare that all work performed in accordance with this agreement shall not exceed a total of 588,000. The work covered by this agreement shall consist of Repair and Rehabilitation Loan activities. Reasonable efforts will be made to expend 60% on the Loan program, which is to include deferred and formal assurance, as well as regular loans, and 40% on the Senior Home Repair Program, 6. CITY shall assume sole responsibility for planning and implementing all outreach activities and efforts and for the printing and dissemination of all written materfal. 7. a, OCD shalt submit itemized monthly statements of work performed, the number of applications received, the number of enrollments, and the number of completions. Ethnicity of clients whose work has been completed, is to be provided monthly for purposes of reporting to HUD. b. At the close of each quarter of the program year, COUNTY shall bill CITY for costs incurred during that quarter, pursuant to the teens of this agreement n U B. In the event this agreement is terminated by any party for any reason, COUNTY shall be paid by CITY for all services rendered on the basis of the percentage of work completed on the date notice of termination is given, and except for the obligations described in Paragraph 3b and 3c of this Agreement, neither party shall have any further obligation under this Agreement. 9. CITY and COUNTY hereby agree to meet in an informal meeting to resolve all disputes arising out of or relatir~y iu this Ayreera nt or the breach thereof. 10. CITY and COUNTY hereby agree that the employees hired to work in the repair program described here :n will meet the minimum standards currently required in the COUNTY'S Housing Program. 11. All information obtained from or about the participant sha 11 be used solely for the purposes of this Program and for determining eli9ibil ity. The names of participating individuals and all information obtained from or about them will be held in absolute confidence by the CITY and the Office of Connnunity Development and its emp lcyees. Any information requested by other County departments, State, local, or federal agencies which would permit the identification of a participant or his/her address will be granted only upon receipt of a written permission from the program participant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the governing bodies of the parties hereto have authorized this Agreement and have caused the said Agreement to be executed as of the date hereof. By: CITY OF RAxIC}U CL'CANLPiGA COl/1Nfy OF SAN BFRNARDINC~ • BY: l ~ C%~ ~~ ~~P / \ Chairman, tloahtl oY-SUper4iSer5 cu. M~~~ NOV 2 B 1984 ATTEST: ity er APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: MAIfIllA M. SEKE[L1K, Clerk of the Board puty APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Alan K. Marks COUNTY COUNSEL i ity Attorney eputy Qu unsT Dated: ~ ~r~or /5 /~f' • -3- sv • ATTACHMENT F1 Program Expenditures Total City Program Expenditures 588,000 Program Expenditures by Percentage and Dollars a) Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program 60° of 588,000 = $82,8L'0 b) Senior kepair Program 40r of $88,000 = $35,200 • 11/13/84/jj HP2-R000A lJ ~~ ~ the San Bernardino County Transportation Commissior t~C~~~~~y SAN HERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS ~~---" i A PLANNING COUNCIL OF CDOPERATING INTERACTIVE GOVERNMENTS Wells Fargo Building, 334 W. Third Street, Suite 401 San Bernardino, California 52101 (714) 884827E DATE: December 19, 1964 TO: SA/v'BAG Board A1embers 1ls vors City Clerks City \fenagers FP.O\!; Ices 91cDaniel, Executive Director StiBJECT: CTC P.eagQointment _ Keller Ingalls • At the SAtiB.AG meeting of December ii, 1984, the Board unanimously approl~ed an action urging Kalt Ingalls' reeppoin tment to the CTC I end requesting member agencies io take similar slaps. The members all Celt that ISelt Ingalls had been very instrumental in securing many projects for us, both vrhile he was in the Assembly and during his two years as a CTC member. He was present at the meeting and pledged continued support for our needs. Attached is a draft resolution end a teller from ilir, Ingalls to the Gev ernor, which can provide additional information. it you need <_pecitie project data to flesh it out, please call us. Ke request thef you consider sending either a letter o[ support (you can adopt the resolution) or approve a resolution. In either case, please send the original to the Governor end copies to those shown on the attached page. Thank you. N'vi:sh cc; V;elter Ingalls Bob Nielsen Attachments K CITIES CF'. AOELAIJTO, BARBTOt'J. B'G BEAR LA 6E, CNMO, COLTOK. FDNTaNA. Gry.N DTERRACE. LOMA LINDA. MONTCIAIR. Original: The Honorable George Deukmejian, Governor • Attention: Mervin Baxter, Appo[ntmen is Secretary State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Copies: '•lii rk Nest-, Attention: Dana Reed Business, Transportation, 4 Housing Agency 1120 N Street, Room 2101 Sacramento, CA 95614 iCelt Ingalls, Commissioner P.O. Box 542 Riverside, CA 92502 Cali[ornia Transportation Commission Attention: Bob Nielsen, Execut[ve Director 1120 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814 1'!es S!cDeniel, Executive Director S,4NBAG 334 iV. Third Street, Suite 401 Sen Bernardino, CA 92401 ~', • .~3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA GFOR+E DfU %MEJIFN WAITEi ING41 ,ONINDI CCw¢:SSMiNIR ' r,~ I.O EO%54 v RIVE RSIDE. CA v] • (71II ]E4010C CA LIFORNIA,iR~5POR7ATION COMMISSION Z I O N STREET, IO. 00% 1 q9 SACM MEMO DSE03 ' (v i 61 u5.1E90 is ii "'r I^•, r ~~ L December 5, 1984 j~, ~~ ~ `, ( I~! _[ 1 Q ~y p;i L~ ra eE...rm:a~ The Honorable George Deukmejian A;wW^'ED' Governor, State of California cru State Capitol Szcraaento, CA 95814 Attention: Marvin Baxter Appointme n[s Secretary >:y dear Governor: • ay this letter I am applying for reappointment to the California Transportation Commission. I am presently serving the balance of a four-year term, having been appointed in December of 1982 upon my retirement f:cm the California State Assembly. I have been associated in and involved with transportation policy making for the past twelve years. Curing six of those years, from 1974-1980, I was chairman c`_ the Assembly Transportation Committee. As chairman of thzt important ccmmiitee, I was privileged co author a ~:a riety of legislation, ranging from the creation of local county commissions to the mandating of transit labor efficiencies, culminating in the pas:.age of Assembly Bill ;02 (Aleuist-Ingalls Act1. That landmark legislation not only created the California Transportation as the successor to the various boards and commissions which previously had dealt with transportation financing and Manning, but also created the system of inter-relationships Se t•.:een state and local government which is the framework for today's transportation planning and financing•decision Waking for the State of California. As the architect of the 402 process and the "father" of the California Transportation Commission,.I have a strong paternalistic interest in seeing that our transportation decision-making process is a successful ~~ T 1 December 5, 1984 • Page Two one. I also share your strong belief that the people of the State of California deserve the best transportation facilities and opportunities that i:heir tax dollars afford them. As an advocate forexpa nding the •t ransportation opportunities for the people of the State of California, I found myself in strong disagreement with the previous administration's priorities and was frequently at odds with the former Director of [he Department of Transportation and an outspoken critic of the Brown Administration's lack of support for transportation. Because your,prede- cessor did not have the commitment to transportation that you and I share, the 402 process was not allowed to work until you came to office with new direction and new personnel. I find this an exciting time to be involved in the work of the California Transportation Commission. It is a pleasure to see the process which Z authored finally work, and work well. Pfy sincere request is to be • allowed to continue to be a part of this exciting and successful venture. Because I was appointed by the previous Governor (over the strong objections of his close supporters) and then only for the two-year balance of a a four-year term, I have not been able to participate as actively and as freely in the deliberations and the business of the Commission as I would like. (Although due to seniority znd rotation I am next in line to be a vice-chairman of the Commission, I have deferred to one of your appointees as the more appropriate choice.) Should I receive the favor of your appointment, I would be able [o participate even more actively and fully in the Commission's deliber- ations. Although I would be greatly honored by your reappointing me to the Commission, the desire for the elevated status that comes with holding high public office is not my overriding consideration. I believe I can make a significant contribution to the activities of the California Transportation Commission. I sincerely believe my reappointment would be a credit to your administration, • 5S .. • December 5, 1984 Page Three as well as a service to the people of the State of California. In that spirit, I respectfully request reappointment to the California Transportation Commission. • Respectfully submitted, CAGI FOR A TRAM SPD. TIOV COMMISSION halter M. Ingalls Member .:..I •als • n U 7~ , 169d0:Y. lepb:bu 1t80LPIIn N0. EY•~ 8'~-Dy' A 1a90L0t[Ol OT i1E CIIT COOtCil OT i96 CItt OP W®D [9CANppCA, CLLIPOLpL, SpPPOltt110 IpE IPJPPOip'DOlti OT VLL'Rl IpCALL9 I[1 tea CALItOtlIL ilM9POlt1tl0p cowliaala VB{t[A9, Yal Mr Iv4lb, a .saber of the Cd ifocvir MrnblT ruthored M 1246, vnicn utrhl iehed Cowq Ycevrprbeiov Co~iuiovr iv order to rcnie.e rote effective tuvrprtrtivv pro[raiv{; avd VtnW, Arrnbltrev tvplb wat authored N 60f, vhi<n oublirhrd the Glitocvie irrnrp.rrrfon Cp®aeinv, evd pan itirap rav isal tee errwprtatiov decirioo-ulivt peoetu iv ehie rote; rod VYLRW, a Cheirrav o[ tee AernblT tvvrprtrtiov Ce~ittera ne ut ov the Co~iuiov er the brnblt'r raprunta[ive Ern its ivnptiov; evd NLRtAa, duriv{ [nie aeon, ne vu iortr:~nul iv recuriv{ paw{e of 9p 215, vnicn prat ided viol on Ewdiv{ Eor lout r[ree U, rote ni{nrgr, svd public trnriq evd VYCIW, Yalur Ivpllr vu eppivted rr • citiuv rasher of the GliforviR trrvrpnetiov Co~iuiov upo hit volwtrrp recirant Eras e0e runbl[ iv l9{2; avd VtAtTJ9, hie renice ov the Co~iuior hu 6e<n urked M of fectiv covicen Eor tuwpruciov wedr iv both Sao aerwrdivo avd Rirenide Gw[ier evd VpPJIW, hie leedeuhip nu ee<vr<d a r,~ber of uproot Projecu o[ trot • Dewfit to the City of 4vchv Cucuvop; rod VatlCA9, Wlter Ioplb' [en ov tAe Glif oroie icevrprtetiov Cooiu iov vitl azpire iv Tebrwrl. 19a4~ rod VtalLA6, ridupurd rupprt rithiv tee Ivlroe Iapice esirts for hit rerppivcuvt, [rn pbl is •pecio, corrwiq araevin[iow, red bueiwn ivtrrnu; rod Vtt•NAS, [he Ciq of 4ocho Cvcuor{e tither to joie iv chit rupprt [or Val Oer IRNIIi rappiverevt. aDN, Sps<LNl6, ra It laa0Lpa0 that ene Citt of Lrocno Cuwov{r ur{er Cmervor Ceoge Deulaej ieo to rnppiv[ Yd[er Ivplle [o • full Enr-Peer ten ov the GlEfoevhR tuveptv[iov Co~inioR; Rod POlildt, {t ti Rt90LPCD thr[ the le{i LLetire reprnmu[irn Ern 9ev 9erwedlvo Red lirenlde Gweler be mcouu{ed to ur{e evd nppet rush {uMrwwrlrt neppiverevt. PA99LD, ATTl01LD, avd AOOTILD chit • daP a[ Lvwr7, 1999. AT99: • a0lA: A{SEllt: Jov D. Nl4U, MR70r AitEat: bee1P A. MehLLRt, Cltp CLrt ca~. rra~ a ca h,.uvar,c~ AgiaaR/C4wn Mmin4bxols • lpgt M Ca/117417 37!4107 Foal •~ December 13, 1984 Mr. Harry J. Empty Finance Director City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Liability Claims Administration 12-1-84 to 12-1-85 Dear Mr. Repays Just a Hole to ra111nd you that our Curren! contract for liability claims handling expired November 30, 1981. I am suggesting that we renew for an additional 12 months on the same tarme and con- ditions es in Lhe exlsiing contract with the tollowing minor changes: 1983/84 1984/85 P Services $26.00 per hour =27.00 Telephone 46 of anrvicea St Photogzapha 1.50 per color print ::o change Mileage .35 per mile t.o Change Photocopy .15 par page .20 Stenographic 3.50 par page No change Office Expense 13.00 + 10~ of services 513.50 + 10• The shwa rsle changes amount to approximaeely 3•, percent over-ell increase. This egre44aant sill guazentee your rnea slruatura with no change through November 30, 1985. I suggest, for convenience, that we renew this on the basis of your signature ns indicated below. I! you hew any queationa, please contact !ha undersigned. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN i COMPANY RSC:ab Aoy B. George Enc: Reply envelope +~ 9I~~GN~~A7vR=~~pp7p1~4pE01y1" ~~ ~0p7p7~,~11~~ DATEt i~/ri/ry a111410~ 70A0MA11 (aq ~N17 p1A M ~ea 41n 4e 71.4 e1I111 CLAI4 AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY [Gov. C Sections 905, 910] TO: CITY OF RANCHO C[I('AMONGA 9320 Baseline Road, Unit C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 CITY ~ RANCHO C~IM~.AA OflGA ADMINISTRnTN)N OEC 81 I!1 L>R,al,l,~s Pursuant to applicable provisions of the Government Code the following information is submitted in support of the instant claim: 1. The name of the Claimant is G.G.S. Enterprises, Inc., whose address is 5649 Alhambra Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90032. 2. Notices concerning this cla:.-~ should be sent to Richard A. Granowitz, Esq., 290 North "D" Street, Ste. 504, San Bernardino, California 92401. 3. The da *_es, place and other circumstances giving rise to this claim are as follows: Claimant is the Lessee of a commercial building located at 8886 Vincent, Rancho Cucamonga. Claimant proposed to manufacture furniture at the commercial site at 8886 Vincent, Rancho Cucamonga. Based upon the express representations of the Foothill Fire Protection District regarding the suff i^,iency and appropriateness of the building J 1 • at 8886 Vincent, Rancho Cucamonga, for the purpose of furniture manufacturing, Claimant was induced to enter into a lease agreement for~such building for the purpose of manufacturing furniture. The term of the lease was five years, and rent is at the rate of 516,000.00 per month. The F'oothiii Fire Protection District has given and Continues to give, inform and disseminate to Claimant, improper, inaccurate and negligent misinformation and continues to make misrepresentations all regarding the sufficiency and appropriateness of the building at 8886 Vincent, Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of manufacturing furniture there by Claimant. Claimant first became aware of these matters on or about October 23, 1984. In addition, the Foothill Fire • Protection District has imposed requirements upon Claimant which are are not legally or factually necessary for the manufacturing of furniture at said location. Moreover, the Foothill Fire Protection District has improperly, and with an intent to specifically harm Claimant, or with a conscious or negligent disregard of the possible consequences to Claimant after having been specifically advised of Claimant's needs, requirements and contemplated uses, failed and refused to inspect at all Claimant's leased premises, or inspect same in a timely manner, after having specifically agreed to do so. The District has refused to advise Claimant, in any event, of the DSstric is purported requirements to allow Claimant to • 2 • manufacture furniture on the premises. 4. As a result of these actions hezeinabove alleged, Claimant may suffer losses and damage for the full extent of the lease agreement for the property at 8886 Vincent, Rancho Cucamonga, in the sum of $960,000.00. In addition, Claimant has suffered loss of income and loss of reputation and goodwill, all to its damages in an amount not yet presently ascertainable, but in any event, in an amount believed to 6e not less than $500,000.00. 5. The name or names of the public employee or employees causing the injury, damage, or lose, if known, include, but may not be limited to the Foothill Pire • Protection District, Susan D. Wolfe, Jim W. Bowman and Lloyd B. Almand. 6. Claimant, at present, is unable to enumerate the exact amount of damages incurred or to be incurred to date, but said damages are in a sum not less than 51,500,000.00. Dated: December 21, 1984 RICHARD A. GRANOWITZ, A PROFES NAL LAW CORP I By: char A. Granow Attorney for Claimant • 3 ~1 OLD[LIECL q. 230 • Y OLDIIIIRt 0/ TlA CITI OP RLIICBD COCINOIIC/, CALIPOOII, l1ODII110 SAL R1RSI0 COC1MOmG/ AOkICIPIL COD[ PLLtlILI116 N TLC R0004t20L OP L~OIJLCLt. TM City Couadll of tM Clly of RwM Cucuonp, Lall[CrD1a. don xdaln •a Collwa, SECIIOm Ir tM RadcM Cucatonp Muntcip•1 Cede la MnDy ammd•d :o read a folleua, ^CMPL•r 1. AmWlanen ^gp, LL.1,01. DKinltldd•. OoLaa atMMt• atalM. wr0a aM bmt are d•f toga n CClldwt (•) Al00L111C[. tM bA 'aeulan<•' nw any wM<U apwially <orutructad, mdift•d or pulppad, and n•d toe the purpoa• of !r•dapoKl~ sink. LPJurN, cdnolnenl, infin or oth•rv1a• Inc•p•Cltat•d paraD,u and VDSCD Sa puippM Vito arrianay alLnalinL d•rian (eucD u red 11LDt and aims) or Vnicn La auDJ•et to lLewinL Dy LM C•llfomia Ri/D•q Patrol as am uwlaa<a. (D) 1lOIOL/NCL gEAP2CL OPFR120A. Th• t•rs 'mDUladc• ferrite Op•rataf' Nw Ny parade Vn0 OVM ar OD•rat•a O(la Or •dr• amDUlan<n. (C7 COUACIL. IDa cars 'Council' Hans eh• City CDUne11 Of LM City of RaneM Ncaawnp. • (dl CLLg3 OF gERPICE. Coe t•m 'Class of Smrie•' a•ana :M Lval or Lola at ewpbaiq '1•id as•rpncy aWidal nntau and ~ +111 M ap•vifi•d as Mala 11Ce .:+pp<rt pmridad Dy r pncy Madi<•l Tnralalad (ENS-t A) D•KOM•1 :on[orslaL Co C•llfomia Nnitn uW gaf•Ly Coda, 9•C!!an 1760 ([). .1 sdrana•d 11f• auDDdrt Drorid•d Dy C•lifomi• lidw•d DDyaloiu :r Dy paru•dlca uW •PDlU inlnaiv care nw»a emtiflad Oy cM ::.nty H•altn Officer under CaltfornSa Holth and 9af•ty Coda, gaCtidn '+Bl, (•) CItS. ID• Can 'City' ••anf Lh• City of RanChe Cu<amanp, Calaomia. (f) CISS MAAIO[L. ih• brm 'Grey Aanapr' nw tn• ttey MaP•{•r of tM Clty e[ Rmem Cueamonp, dr n1a Goipaa. (~) COUNSt. the Cart 'Cauncy' aaana LM County OC gan B•mardieo, Callfdm!•. (D) e00NM NCALSA OrtICtR. IT• tars 'CeuntY Huleh Ofti<•r• mew th•t parade dulp•e•d u auto Dy CM Cdwty df gee A•rnaMinO. (1I 6T4ROLAaa C1LL. Tn• Nn '9rrt•nar hll' b • rpu•at Cor Ch• dlapmtDD of N YWSamC• CO CrwpO'! Or Dmrida OCDM Uflalb<a Cor • praas Moe appar•etly Ma • auddaa Or untpr•a••n nand Of m•di<m1 aCt•ntla0. UI E(4ROtIKf SMPICL. the Cm 'Farpndy 9mria•' wua LM fwctiw p•KOrsM to m•polu• td ao amrpdgr call. (k) PAS'.'Q[. TM CM 'Patlmt' mmo• • aldk, tn~ur•d, Vaudd•dr lnr•11d, •ip•etmDt motD•r, coDVal•wwt, or dtn•rria• lwpmaltatW pN'•om. (1) PLEA011. 1'D• ten 'P•r•o•' leplWU .ey indlridu•1 pvtNr•ESp. tilfa oorpotmtio•, a•m001atiaD, pr•rl~•m4l a{aaf or acDp' P'd•P df aaMlaattae wtte~ u a ueit, {(/~ Ordtn•Me No. 2O0 P•q. z (N) IASit lifE SUFFONT (LLS) AMNNMCE. TM tern 'KS • AlYlwu' aelwt M wM1aK• Midi n•3 equtpnwt aM fupplln as ipKlfiN op Title lS, C•llfonie Ad•1Mitntin Cade. (n) NDVANCEO LIFE SUPPdiT (ALS) ON LIMITED AOYAMCEO LIFE SUP1011T (LlllS) MMRMCE. TM tern 'ALS ar LALS Meulwce' news w +alElllanu whld nn addltton•1 squlpeMt owl supplln es specified oy tM CaMY Nxlth O/Ifur. (a) MOEILE INTENSIVE CME (NIC) PMMEOIC. fie tern 'NiC Darwedit' ne•M • pNSU sMCfally trained 1n tM provisim o/ awrgeircy c•rdiK aM nwKardiK can approprl Kely certified oY Me coansr II.•t en OHlcer. IOI NDI[lf INTENSIVE CME (NICI NIMSE. TM tern 'MIC muse' newt a mire rM has Men urtlflb oy LM County Nea1M Offices as qualified in CM provlitu 01 ansrgwcy cVdIK aM ,roKardlK CVs In tM hsu•nce of wVgency instrucdans to NIC parwdics. (ql PENNITTEE. TM ten 'Perm stn' peens anY arson wM pattettn • Curlent City penis to act as an weu Hnce serrl Ce operator. (r) CODE 7. iM LeA 'Cade l' nNans Me period Men ae wM1aMe is eraveltnq to or trap a patient pick-up paint using red I lyhts aM/or sirem end Is traveling 1n sucn • m,ner +s to rutn its dntlntlM In CM inortut pastlOH one. "SK. 1.1.02. iernits: NMUlrtd. It tMll M unlawful for any person, efeMr of awns. wploYn or otntnlse. Lo pperaq N woglance, or to angage In business as an anenlenu nrrlu operator, uonn tM ttrests H anY Duolic way ar pHU In Ms C1tY except 1n ca•`ameaKS wf th a valid CItY pernit to operate w anMlwce servtu. (a) EECEITIONS. TM '.lutpnent and personnel suMarOs sPKffled in Mls cMptn aDDl7 to all esMLnce +9eMles; however, tM Huns/nq oM psrnit nqutrs~enes sMt1 not apply to: (1) Puollcly tuned woglances: ar, (2) Vwlcles ppereted as amoul antes et Me request al local autMrtties during mY 'state of war tmergencri' duly prK1a1NM 'suG of wergencY' ar 'local wargncY.' as aeH Md fn tM Cal lfornt• FaergwcY San Ices Act (CMptp 7 of Olvitl on 1 of iltls 2 of tM Wnnnwt Code), of aneiMed. "SK. 1.1.0]. PeAR inf. PerNtt fwf tMi1 M roofs which ere, trap else to tin, ut oy Me CoWN:11. All peiwtts snap De Issued to ltplr! on Jun )0 of eetn ri•r. "set. 1.1.01. Appllotlw /or . Perntt or NeMwel o! a Pernlt. (el PNOCWOII[ ANO INONMT[ON NEWIREO. Pnnwitites to tM ISSUMn o/ s perNlt ar rsMwel Of a Den1t for r appllunt sMll lneluM tM /fitnq wisp tM CitY Nenager M lppllutton in wrtttnq on a forty to M furnRMd OY tM C1tY NMeger, wnlcn sM11 Drovtee ene following nlnlet~ 1n/onNtton: (1) NM and deferiptlon o/ 1pp11ewR • Ordinance M. t]0 Page - tMivtduat(2~itu.^Mff addrus and retidenci address of My (3) iM name under which tM ambulann service +til do DuslMSS. (Q [f a <OrpONti M, a J01nt vMture, < Daftn<RMD Dr Hmittd parinersMp, Me ne~ms o1 sIi partners, or the names a1 corporate ofllcers, MHr residence addresses and toeir percentage of partlcf6+tiM in cM buslMSS. ($) A verificatiM that CM applicant Is <pu ipped to and wlii provid! ALS paramedic servl<! at eii times fn the City. (d) A itatlMnt In MMwal appllUttonf CMt the appliGnt owns or MS undo his control required equlpamnt to adeouately conduct N aaW laMe serv l<e In tn! CitY. rA1cM1 meets tM requireMnts est\o11snM by tM California Yeh icie C(Mt, and tMC CM applicant owns or nIf access tp sul table and safe facllitles for maintalntng hit amDul ante SerV1G to a cicM and LOi Lary cOn0ltiM. wlen an fniti al appll Cat lan is suOmt Cted, a stateaaMt Mat cM appllunt +111 own or +111 Mve undM Ms control reoul red equlpaeMt to ad\quately Conduct M M4u1 MCe sere ice ~n ene City, whim meets tM reoutreeents establlsned by Me Cell/ornia Y<nicle Code aM Mat the appllGnt w111 o+n or +111 Mve acGlss t0 am table and soh hcllitles for nulntN ntnq Mt anieul anq servl ce ~n a c1eM aM sMltarY candid on. Both Inttl al and renanl app11c1t1 ohs must contain a fcattment M!c the appltgnt rill nay nteln (ftatl M) at least cne ALS epui p0ed MMe1Ma w1tMn tn! gepgre0hi cal DandarLs O1 tM Clty. Atldltlonally, tM apDlicant must establish to M! rNSMa61! tali sf action of the Clty Manager Mat the ippllGnt has adeoueh upablHty CO 'back up• Dr dugeln! such 0.k$ Bout peed . ambul Mt! if It is mt lnatedlately aw11 able to reipcnd CO a call Mentor. (Yj A lilt /or rental appllCatl Mf anMdld at required during tM year for any ehe-led, su0stt toted, loaned or leased vehf ties, 9lviny a Complete :<scr lOtlM of each etAUl MCe vMIQe operated by tn! appN CMt, cOv<~~nq a list of the internal eoulpMnt arriad DY each aabulMn, inc'~aoing the pat/Mt capacity thereof, end a copy 0! LM ngSt npnt pmbul cent! [nsPectton Ae00rt 1tsuN Oy LM Lai tfornla hlgMaY patrol for each vehicle. MMn an inl ti el aOpHUtlon Is suMltteo, • list, amintlld as required durMq LM year /Or any cMngM, substi toted, IoeMd or teased veh l<1 es, giving a cweplet\ defCrl Dtton of each MOUl ant\ veniUe tp D! oplratld by the appllcMt, covering a Ilst of the internal eouipmint carried by each eMUI MCe, InCl uelnq Me Dati ant Capab111 ty thereof, and a COpY of M! mpst rNent aepulMa LntpecCt on gepart Itsuetl by the Cal UOrnta Ntgn+ay patrol for aaM vMlcle Mail De provided to the Cicy Manager prlpr t0 tn! start Of ambulMn operation. (B) M aftlnnatlM Ior renewal eDDllgtlpns tMt Uch penlttad ambYlMd NO Its aDOUrtManas Conform to all aDpllcabl• provisions of MIS OnInMCe, tM Ca111oro1a VMIt1e Code, the Lalifornle Admi nltMltive Cade and enY bther State, County or Cfty applluDL Olnctln. MnM M inl tl al aODllcadM is submi tt\d, ono afilnalClM tMt euD permitted en0ulMn and Its appurNnuicet tonfons to Ul applicable pror5si ohs Of tMS <MptM, tM Lalthrnla Ylhitl\ COM, tM Cal lfornie Admintstratlw Codl, Mo MY Other StaN, County Of C1ty applieable elrecttn Shall be provided t0 tM City MMagM Or1pr to tM se\rt of Imbul MCe operations. (g) A stetrrnt /pr renaal appllUtloM that M\ appllcmt agiDys sufNNMt personnel ad\paately CrafMO arte antllel\ to d\tiver eMrgMCY Al$ prcaeedle eabuleM\ smites or ts~tuMlttM,aa SUtM\nt CMCnCM iapp ilCM M 1}nlmploy~f/1ctMt p\rsdm\t aegpablY M\IMd Md \vellN to to dtilver eMrgedcY AlS amWlMt\ serYten of goad quaNty at dl t1MS. '~ Or'd1n•na• b. 270 P•p • (f0) l list fm r•n•u•i aW11c•tlaN µrtep • e•NrlptlN• of th• 1•Nl e< tnla!•~ far Non Ybllmp Yp1ayN and • roW of ••Cn NrtiflNC• or liCma• tnuN M ell SL•M Yd Cawty NtaDll•nly au•litlNCloN of auc6 WraoY•1 se YDUlYN op•ntion•. IInY Y 1nlti•1 appllwtiro fa auYletW, • 1lrt, ar•d•d N rpulr•d dotty an• lam fm my panoen•1 chanps, dirln~ d'i•oHptiaa of tM I•Nl of Mlnly for NeD a•DUlYC• wployN and • ropy of son entiftwb or llc•N• laau•d h CM Stall all Cowty YtaDllanin( qualirlNtlN• of awD Wramn•1 io YDUlmc• opmatlom atoll M prortdad to ell City MYym prior to start of YDU1mN op•ratim. (11) A atata•Nt, In m lnltt•1 application, [Nt ahWS to ell NelafNtlN of CM City Mwryr cMt ell laauaru• of • Wr•tt is In tM puDllc intmNt and tMr• is • nNd for • pant! to M SaavW, In tMt thn Ss • rputranmt for YDUlmc• Nrr1N Mim CY M 1•plly svrlC•d Dy CM apptle•nt. (12) a at•t••mt alpW 01 th• appitemt tMt N condltim of tM City bwlp{ • p•r•St, •pplic•nt a•rwa to appw and eatNd all aetloY •p1Mt CM City •riain• ouc or ell axareta• of w1d D•rnt, all atoll !rWaaitr Yd a•n CM Clty, Sta of!SC•ra Yd Yplor••a all arynta nar•1••a of all trN aii ci•1N. Saomda, aatlms, or wwN of Nt1•Y of nary kind all dNCrlpelpn r•acaty dir•Ctly er SndirmCly, ulsiy out at, a Sn my vay Com•ct•a ritR ell nnciN o! Lhis Walt. ^S•C. 0.1.05. InYYtlptlN D> City Monaryr. Upon rN•ipt of • Ca•pUt•d Sn1C1.3 (non-nn•NU applicatim, CM City Man•pr atoll rnndu<t m 4ngaClrytion to dat•niM 1! tM appL'Cmt •••ta all rpuirapnta a! ChL Ord1n•nC•. JDOn co•p:•tlon of hla tnrmttrytion, CM Ctty "enaryr atoll raco~•nd to LM Cawc11 coat • panic M MntW or d<r.'.al. ID• dat•r•ination ar cM Cawcil shall ea Nd• •[tar • pu0lle ~+tr1n{ upon ell aw11f lc•:SOna or CM .ppucmc. "Sm. a. t, 06. IfawnN ar Om1a: <f P•rnlt. (O ID• C[C1 Cowcil Ny ordv Lh• Snumea of • nN p•r•1t to Conduct m YOUlmw ryfriC• to CM City upon findly [Mt th• appllemt a•ata •11 rpuiran•nta or ChL CrCinmc•. !Dl rn• Cowell Yr erdv ell eanial ar a panic IC St finder (1) :Tut tM appllc•CSOn Sa not en cna tan and daN nac rontaln CM (ntorYtlOa rpuirm er tM prorialona or Chia clupurt (2) 11ut tM rMfcln d•aeriD•d Sn [M •ppllwttaa an 1MdpwN Cr uw•t• for tM pwpoaN tar uRloR CMy all to M w•dl (7) flat CM Color •Ch•••, n•N, annadr••, or tnsipi• to M w•e upne •um rM1e1N la Sn Conflict aitR or t•1t•N• m1 rolm faR•N, n•N, •onop~r, ar Sna1ryL ua•d 0y my Wraan N • W M aSalNdly or t•dd to d•NSN or d•[r•ud tn• WDilc. (a1 ID• eowail ry ordm tM dmLl o! • Watt lr en• appllemt ar my p•rtnmr otHe•r er dlr•ator tMr•ofr (1) MY pnrlowly CM Rold•r of a Ctty Walt, •RSCR Wn1t N• nNY•d m Iwpmd•d <M CM Carla m COrWittaM 9f tn• awp•Mtm MN nac MY Nlfill•d a~ corncOW. (2) U to~iCCty my Nt, Mlon, tt oo~ttt•d M my Wt11ttN, avu10 M pwed• for ell swpY•lw Cr nroa•tim of Watt LuuN purau•nt to eni• arein•n••. WJ DroinMCe M. 270 vaq. s (q) N1s cow/Clad any act Invp ivin9 dishonesty, Irwd, or detest MKedY anotkar 1s infured or when CM appitcant has benefftM. ({) Nas xted as M anW IMCe service oMrator in the City rltfwut possesfiiiq !valid Pemait Mlrelor. (f) xaS Nded or abetted any person to violets any provlston of this Napter or any prior Mbulan~e ordinance. (6) NakeS any fake or n/t Iladinq ttatanent upon any appllation, pr during CM tours! of anY investigation, repaired or perm! tth by Mls chapgr. (cl 80N0If16 OF kPPt[CkNT, Blfor! any permit is issued under tM provistans o1 this Ordinance, cM Louncil shall rcWtrc Che app HCant as a coMitfan to tM issuance oI Me pernlt to past wRn the Ctty Clerk ! ysn DoM in the sw of Twenty Ftve Thousand Ooll arf (fqf, WO.OOi or ! surety bontl In LM saM Mgani turnlswe oy a Corporation authorlia0 to eo ouSlness 1n the State o1 CalSPorM e, payable to Me City. TM bond sMil a conoiHoad upon the full and /aithful perforruna by LM pma/tree of Ms pbli9act ohs ender the apptluele provisions of M1s Ordinance and snail be kept 1n full fora aM effect by tM penlmtta! throughout the life of the pereit aid all raiieialf tMreof. (d) LAIIL[Ty INSURkI1CE. The perms etn shall obtain and kep In force during tM terw o} tNd plrnit public Ifabtlity and bodily insurance isswtl 6y a cagany eutharlxW to M bust ness in tM SGte of Celifornla Inturinq CM owner, and oleo nMiny the Ctty as an addst]onal insured of such anbulan~! against loss by reason of Indury or dMages that m1y result to persons ar property frmn negl /gent operateon or defect Ne const^uctton of such Mbul ante, or from vfol alto pf this Ordl neMe :~ pf any pthM ear o{ tM flat! p1 Cali/ornta or of LM Unitetl Stets. Said policy sM11 b! in the sun of not less Man Fwr Niiiton )ol tart (R,000,DD0.001 for personal tnfury to pr death of My one x~son In any sln9le accident; and tM Haiti of etch tuM vMtcle shall not be Lest thm four Nlttia Dollars 1f1,000,000.00) far dams7es to or destruction of property in any oM Rcidlnt. Yorker' Compensate on insurance sM11 a Curfed <oNrliq alt fmplpypi o1 M! Derml ttee. CpPtes of the poNttes or arts/catty evlderKtnq taco polities sMll a 111!0 wf en tM City Clerk. kit Po11C1ls shall contain a Drovlsi en reouiNnq a tMrty (W) day ~wttce tp M given to the Gty Clara DH Or tp cancellation, mpdtftutta or reduction of Iimt ts. 'Sec. 1,1.07. Content of permR. TM permit shall spKtfy the dates of issuance ono pf eaptratton, tM nuaper of Mal ante units tp a usetl by tM Delpittee ono My spe[111 aMitlMt regards nq comawiapons, eWlpment an0 personnel deiced appropN lU by the City Council. 'Sec, {.1.01. MMdment Of Perml ts. Upon redwst by tM Dlrgi[tN, tM Ctty MMager may amend ere wndi tipnt SDlelHed In ^ peMt if M f1MS Suck requnted changes to M in supstantlal cpagllana with LM provlsfonf o/ NiS Chapter. Such MMdment fM11 not alfeet CM lapinefon dot! 01 tM aaiftinq peA1t, nor thdl it autMriu a change to orMrsMp frog Mat spKlflad to tM oNgtnal peealt, `. Ordlnwm M. 230 Pap 6 'eN. t. t.al. Mehl of tatftN. • (a) Pantta .eul M r•tymaa amwur Dr cha cur CYnaPar npm appltNtim et tM p•n1CtN, it CM gntt Mldar DrogaN m auNtwel.l eMep m eM amcwe er eM p•nte, and a cM clq !Yeah,' Nt•rslNa Ctlat tM parait holder Ns, Burin/ CM pmiod of CM aylrlm paradC, opantN W wNtantial crovfarnly ulttl CM Dro•is1aN of ChU ONfnwN and cM rylN avd r•N1ac1aN aC CM City, and CMC M Sa cagCl• of aavtlvulG ogratim in evntvrslty .Itb CM ry1N a0d M1Nlatiew Or CM CSty. (D) UnlNa pad GYN Cw M alpm q the graltb•, it atoll M . slid OaaL Cer nee-rwayl of a grate u tN p•ra1tCN Raa mt, durto~ tM pr•a•diva pa~lt p•rlod, tud • Cod• 3 r•apma• CSN to at lwst 95f ar ita +ara•oes N1L of •lpt (e) ntnutN w iwa. eaid nspwN tiN Mleq awsurN [rm the cSN tea gnlttN r•c•1••d CM r•aYNt will LM P•rY1tCN'a aaDUl•vc• aotNlly •rrtvd at tM lautlm for aMaD tM a•MN uu rpwat•d. (c) IC LM rN•wl applldatiw progau • aNStwtlal chanp iv CM concwt of CM peel,, CM a0D11Ntim atoll M pryc•asM u a vw apDllNtim punuN! to awtlaN a,1.0e and a.1.Ofi e[ thca eMDC•t'. •M0. •.1.10. ewNwlm and M•watSN yr P•nita. tea City Mna{ar atoll M •agoaarae to awpand ar ra•ob tM grad, 1asuN uvd•r tM pro•Salws of tell CMOMr W op•nN N aneulam• aaniaa, aRw It has Caw towel afLar inrutlptim LMC Let gn1eLN el' Ny pY'CNfr OrrleMr nr .flraaterl (a) givlatN avy awtim of this cNptm ar Ny ru1N ar • nNlaLims LMC an pr•wlptad ey the city vtlictl ralaN ce hia gr•iC Nti•SCiN. (D) Ia cvvSOt•d of Ny :ftaMa nlatina to tM ua•, Nl•, gauNiw, ar trNapw2aciw o! hanotios or MDiC Ior•tn~ drop. (e) Caaactts avy NC in•c:vtn~ dlahonuty, fraud, er dw•!L aMnOJ amCMt' is lalurN, or ybnDy eM p•raletN Ma C•na[SCN, or any wt ipNl•in{ aural Cwpttud•. (dl NN nlmaq•swtN • N. 1 feet In oat•intn{ • peel[, or L N 1•rra! adp•r1u0 to ... conditloN apwitlN Sn M1la a0P11Ntlm. (q a1N or a0•b any gnov Me v1vLeN :M preHaivvs of teU aMPt•r. (!) /ells to asdY and kaap ramna fhwlo~ RU LransaatloN N • pn7.iteNr or hill to NN fum r•eona a•allsala Car lNpwtim Dy ctla Clty )Ynafar ar ela dolt weMrlsN npwwNtb• for a griN at mt laN cew cerN ywn afe•r oa~Uttm of wy tranaaotlee td mlotl CM ramrN r•[•r, er ntw•a to mDply aite a vrlCtw rpwst Ot CM Clty (YmtY' er aab loch naaN anilatlla ter iNpwtiaD. f~) lawpes u a•mfatlay call aha0 •Stbr muOU or uavlllia{ to pn•SN cM nOwatN a•r•iw a tails to ivfon CM grave npwatiP~ sum saMN at qtly NW asd tLLla N oDNln tM pmawt et auae parsm Mtan NNiq m NDYINN to napond trm • lamclm Mn dlatmt LMn tea en• to aElaD tM raquwt Daa dirNLad. <N /N2asa• WaNW aNhaN 1•aaN+aaaaa.• b NnatsasNYy /Parfiaa Mi0 IasaDadM •Da/paq aaNaN /N • N.tYNY pgaa M arN eW 2a tlaaDa• ~7 oralwaw ao. zla rase r (h) r•SL b ooctfy tM rlr. 0•p•ltaant or • r•gwat for aa•rgmy aaeulaaw a•rriw. (1) Opanc•a m aahulspN dmtaa as • par•nad1C wit h1 WN1o{ ar 1•et•rlda « CM wSt vlteeue gwli[SK MC D•raomal end pulysant 1o tM vhlCb. (J) Owioa any validation p•rloa or not Seas clua tMrty (,0) dqa, fallun of D•t+itt•• co r•apow to 951 0[ COd• 3 calla vlthin elgnt (B) ntnuto o! laua vill e• aufflci•nt grouMa Cdr hvonLlen of D•r•it. ^$•C. tl.1 .11. $wWwin. Cmnditlanl Op•hLion. •M /faoorarr Vvtane•. In tee •vL Of • CIINg• to ovn•lfhSD Of +nr ktvd or wtw•, u,y SRtarcupttem of aanin, K sass •W avNy.gw• 4i•> m•m•• daaaaL••r ar +ay auWCantlal ch•nN to aGC[tng or quipmt o[ tn• YouLvn a•Mn, Mien eaw•• CM uaulada aKViw m b nrrlK out dlrr•rMtl] cnam apwlttK tR tM Cum•ac op•!•tiag D•ratt, LM p•ra1LC•a atoll ptlh tM City Maug•r tYadLbly Sn vrtcing, atatldg CM fames of awn Cn•np. (•I upon rpwae er ce• p•ralct«, cM Cltr nuupr mar sane efapor•ry vviand to writing [!da eM :eKltion ap•ciriK 1o tM origlwl Danit If M ftnda Clot awn en•n{• to Lm aueabetbl Ca•plimn vitn tM proriaien of tnia rnapc•r, if tb Ciq Mwg•r f Sods thae augh eNnga la nt to auhatanenl caaplianc• vltn Mia 0ldinmc•, h• v7 awpaaW, r•wk•, u •m•M tM p•raic or artlt•n netlCe, In all C••b VRM a CIIm11g. Of OM•faeip OCCYra In N ameululC• a•rrlc•, a appllcattw for • nN p•r•te aM11 M !tied utth eM Cte7 ;Lnag•! vitnin :^.6 ty (3D) days, In no e•a• aNli any tnporary vviand• b .mud .^ r ao!• loan slaty ;607 days vltnout vrtce•n •DDroval of tna Cowc!:. "Sac. Y.1. 12. dgpwl Proc•dw• It !M r•npl o[ a p•rale la denied oy tha City Manapr or tf eM CSt7 M•gyr auapaaN or r•vokn • parvit, ch• pat7ritn atoll t• g1Vao Mittan Mttn apadltytRg nOt CRly tna aCttgn Cakan. buC Sn tna avant o[ a awpMaiaa or !•vocaelan, to •[twctr• date tMraot, Midh atoll b not lass enan tltta•n (i5) wya attar ens wu of a•id notice. 9wn noti[inclon atoll b ey rylrt•r•d or C•rtl[iad nail. (al atenln ten (10) aaya of tar tna sate of auto wttttntion, CM palfitt•• w7 raquMt • having b[or• [M Cur !7wpr. soon aquae we b to arteins b tna coy clerk. tt aann rpwae 1• CtMly aaA•, CM •fr•Ctlr• dab o[ any da!•1, awp•oalon or rNOatleq atoll b at•naa wtil ft[ba (15) aya follaving cM Ctty IWUgM'a wtin upae a•id squat. ma Cltr panagx' ar, •fur awns nests{, elfin, apolf7, or art olds eM ortglaal aaglataq. (o) If, altar eM n•.ring prortda for •mr•, CM City !WagM dania CM r•nwl or or swp•K• of nroWa • p•raa.t, cM p•raltta aM11 Mr• eM rtgn0 b d•aam t n•ving ny eM Coulwil. d rpuat for a n••rtag shall b rM to vrteiag eo eM Ctey Clark utenim fiftm (15I al•aav dap follostog tM danL1. awp•wiom, nroatioa oP naa-lfaaal of CM p•ratlt, Uppa r•alpt of • vriua rpw•t, eM Citg. Clark •Mll fat CM seta! Cdr M1a1'leg on a dab not aaM tba •Srty l60) dq• folloslag !•d•lpt O[ qla mritta • hgwat sad g1a aotio• b CM •pp•llat, CG Citr Mgaagw' am any otMr Satarata parses ,In• Y7 pra•gt Hidaaa, r•1•mt b LM awluae of eM ciey lraasr, glenig tmrey (ao) aaya roueNeg eM ~~ Crdinaar t1o. x7o p•n e pt•olwle• at er D••riy, tM Cpwpll aril a•r finaiy aN iaaw • iM ordw'. vMeDr or ppt tN pu'•10 aMuld M tMUN [r CM awparlpn w nrertlw swt•!u. (p) Arty CM t1r •wiLDl• to rpwat b •pprl, and at br t1r DKoa+r tDa •pD••1 to tM Courll atoll Mw Decor t1M1, CM •ffwt of our npa-ranMl, swpanalw al' nmwtiw atoll M atayd. (d) rtvlEMebdly aw pc6r prortatow hralo ppet•led to CM owtr•rr, !M Cltf Mba••r atoll M sq••rd to •ffbt b iw•plat• awpartw of • grdt YSCDeut lalayin{ CM af[•ptiw pats CMrapt It M first tlvda !M owtlnwd eonduot of fuptl gr•ittw Sa b far rar+N frw pp•plibw vlttl ttlia cMOtc or tM {an•nl wlfw of cM clttiaw of CM Clq of to 1wC1ry awn Lradlata •et1w. (•) An7 grdttN •1n Ma auph taadtat• awgwlon btiw Leta agiwt it atoll Mw • tu•riy fonduld Mfan eM Ctey Mavpr rittlln Mpb (TI vertle{ G1a e[ ease awgwiw. •1.0. r.1.17. Oar{roy {•ntw {•pulraaamM. [•pD par•lttw atoll DrortM a•r{•by 1¢C p•ra••dic bDUlb<• sanlw w • wntlnww <Yaney_feul' l2r) howa par MY Maia. •sb. t.l. tr. contor•ra• Ytte panlt oralMtlw. r rtulbw opwtor atoll Dter4M rDulbw faniw for NDUla•p• calla wi{lwtiy YltDtn tM City wlwa M atoll fine Mw • wild Clty grit. Aq wel•etr e[ eDi• Dwtlr ae•l1 M •d•dar•ar. • "gap. t. 1.15. 9ta•E•rda tar Toptb. t•olt a•Dul••w aaniw racHViy r aa.•ryrar a•DUlbw rpwac atoll dLgtetl r ••DUl•ne• in cwplibw vtetl CM proedwn 1dbtlliN ie 8t1• 17, GlttoroU ld•Sniatr•tiw Cd•. If b rDYl•Dw U MC •wil•DU ter taMdi•M dLgtetl, CM procdwa ldwtlriN to 21t1• 17, G1lternL Adtntatratiw Cd•, atoll M poylid vitD. (•> Itl• ttN 0•grtr•c atoll a Sr•pl•t•lr wtltid of any arr{wa7 a•DUlmw rpwat. "7.0. r. 1.16. A•DUi•np• 9ar•t bd tsar 6 ui t •w ra•r •. /•DYl••wa aril M rlnt•lnd •t all tiro In 7ppod ewpnbiwl ngir •N G • plan •N aamtary wditiw. (•) l4111MM LOD)tlOII. 111 rWlbwa atoll M pulppN vICD •11 a•r.er •nd arrtpsay •rulprn6 rputrd !pr a•Dulaopp Dr CM cuuprol. yriel• cod. bd tn• eaurmml. Arlmacr•elw cod• bd •prei•tr•CSw rulN of tM Cpwy gr1tD Cft1oM' u CM far w nov rrletrr w nMNrtM ••bdad. (D) IWt YMIIyCt lWIylllOR. to addltlw tp ttl• npl•r ••DYI•nw •gYip•rt •N auppllw, W AI, a•DYlar• atoll •Sp M p•tppN u rwulrN h tD• wild •da{1Dtaeneiw rules or eM cower 8wleh Oftiwr. tr•a•!•p. D••d•ila~. 1ret.rrr {at ptDrr r{to•t •up~llN wN ta7 pW {•Y trN4rr d p•tirta Kll W Dnt•atN N my w at•rtl• YDr ra•q tm ur. W Drdlaaaea r. 2l0 Pap 9 • "aM. •.1.17. rbilaaoe Peragmel. tier) perar aM dMrr M eadwlenve a1teM tM cty, re1L nepoediry M eaw'pnq Mlla. atoll Maps) uite CM nqulrreoM M Ce• G1lteraL Ad[talatnCin Coda for aWUlenoe drtrera. See drlm of M aawlaar sMll M tnlnM •r CoapeteaL !e tM Drop•r uu of •31 eaarpoo) equipart rpulrw M CnU Ordtaante. ine drlrr atoll also Mld • vMSt1uM of et Irat M F2R-11 voleae [M uM1uM am1M op•rater h•a WM apMiftc•11) eawpeN fra thla MqulreaMt D) CM Couaoll. fa) AMM.A[Ct IT^lNA[[. M aaM1MM •Ctpd•ot atoll M Cn3Md ,-. oaap•tut 1o CM propM uu of all eaan•[env) pulpaM! rpuired M CDU DfdlneoM. em aM11 Mld tM required Mrtlfto•t1M of at lout M tIR-~A. tt tM rMlcle is M!•[ uatl u M AIS YDUIMM, •C lewt glle attandrt atoll Mid • Cert1liCab u u MIC pveaadio u.ued M eM Nruh dram for A13 uDU1MM. (D) ATStp01R [[[VItLD. ben YM1MM Min[ openced utenio CM CSC), M nepoMe M u eur[eaa) Mll, atoll M sNftN D) Mtn • drlpr and Ir: laa~ala. 1'ne 1~: Pn~ata of u uM1eMe napondM[ to M erryee0) Mll atoll occupy t~tlant coapartarot vn1U CrMaportin[ M) person fn •pp•rMt MM 0[ awdiC•1 •etmCiM. M uDU1MM drbM or eaOUluM attendut too b • Callfarnl• lleepaed pn)alclu ar M MIC nurse Mrt:.^LM y tM Count) Nolte OfflMr, atoll M eaeapt trr CM euryuC) eMlul CnMln< nqulrerot et CnL apt1M. ID1f amtlM aMlt pt •ppl) durln[ M) 'state at euryua)' or '1Ma1 err[eeo)• u dettned to eM GMenuent CMe of the Stets of • Gll[arn1•. ^Sp. Y.LiB. Cantlnutton at 'ia, M YDUIMM Maed aM prgml) 11emaW Mtalde the CiCy Dut not 11geMed q tM Cit) aMl: :e auteorisq M eranaport • paetene !o ar terou~ Me CSq, MC ncall MC M uthorlaN Co erMaport patluM or1[igatly[ 1o tea City. "[eC. V, 1.19. FAMr[rof aM D1fUter Dper•LSMe. Dwiry M7 'ataM of vv eur[eM),' •aNte at err[MC),' or 'local err[enC)• •a deflnM in eN hitrornla ta•rpev) 5errteM Aot (CMpter 7 0[ DSrlaton 1 of IStie 2 of CM Corernaut Coda), ea eaMded, ove rau1MM aen1M operator atoll proride pulpaMt, faailltlu, •nd perwmel Y rpulnd D) CM Cler Ma c~^.r. "dp. V.~.20. Veer CMOLMt Procedures. Ant user ar auMM1Mr M M eaenl•IIN fen1M oontendln[ tn•C M nee Deee rpulrM to p•) M uoeuin :Mrp for Nnlge or LMC M nas reaetred unutlatlator) aeniaH r) til• a N'ittr arplatnt vitn CM Cit) MAna[ar aaeeln[ rortn auto allepelar. 'IM Cic) Maaapr .toll Me1td' tM UtwtN p•nltew or auge ooaplaiat, uW atoll MgatlpN CM reMr eo deNraiM tM aa11d1y vt the Co[pl•int. If CM goaplalat Sa de[enlo•0 to M slid, eM CSC) M•na{ar atoll tar • reasorDM •ad proper rttee M aeoun crplia[ge atU CM aMditloos of thU ONLnrM. e[ora "AetMdMt" CMnpd cd "MiC f•ra[WSO" M Id-ti-t1. .- ~ ~/Q Ordinuw Nd. 270 _ v,ge to •Sec. x.1.21. Enforcanxnt RlsponslblHtles. • (a) TM City Manplr SMI1 mrx all necnsKy and reasonaDl! ruiq and rlgulaflons sW7lct t0 tM approval of !ne Council corerl~ anpelance sxrvice OpKatiM, aseul enn eW tpannt, aeeul once vtlil ctas, re~lanG plrsamd, and for th! effective and reafonaDle adilnlstratton a1 tMS Oralnrn. {p) iM L1ty Manager sMil inspect the recOMS, faclliti es, veMpes, eputpnlnt and methods of Operatl on whenevK such I nspectl OnS ere deeMd nlcessry. •Gec. 1.1.22. Escusad pnformmce. ib operator snap be deeawd t0 D• to viol allM or tcs permit if It snap hil LO DrOV1 M, e1 Mer fn wlmL Or in part, the services ONlntiL repaired of 1t If such performance 1a prevented by any pf tM fOllorl ng; (e) Acts pf Gad; (p) lebOr strlklf Or tlisputlf: (c) In[ervlntion of any 9ovlrmeent Dody; or (d) Any fort! reasonably peyond tM Control or ene operator. SECT10a 2: ine Cicy Council Mrepy decl res tMt is wgatd have adoDtld this r nanc! and each sects on, subslctlon, sentMGe. tl auSe, pngA Or pOrLlon tnere0f irrespective of cM fact Mat any Om Or mpn sectfont, suDfecti0ns, Stntmces, claufa, OMafls or porcl ons thereof De dKLred invalid or unconstitulul onal. I1 /or ry rexfpns any pOrtl on Of cn if Ordinance mall M declarM invOld or unconstituttonai, cnen aii other provisions thereof shall remain in full Porte rd Nlect. _ $ CT[ON 3: TM MAYOr sNil sign r~s Ordinance and cM City Clerk sna11 does p ! SYM, rd Me Clty C''rk shall uus! the Ordinrc! to be Oab 713 W '2tMa nlospaplr(o/) glneralr ~~cul aC onsa~011 shed ain CMl CICYT~ near o, a circulated In eM CitY of lancno Cucpnonge, Ell/ornia. PASSED, APP0.0VE0, and AOOPIED this _ day o/ _. 19Ba. AYES: HOES: ABSEBT: on ~ ! s, eYOr ATiE7T: vKY u e e, y K ~ 1 L_J ~f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~cnafotic STAFF REPORT ~' ~ ~ ~, - >;; ,~~~ DATB: January 2, 1985 y~'' ~I~z ~~ $ ~> 19i" T0: City Council FROM: Lauren H. Wasserman "~ /~ -~ Cicy Manager SUBJECT: Formation of Park,and Recreation Improvement Discr ic[ for Improvement of Heritage Pazk and Red Hill Common itq Park For the past several yearn, the City Council has span[ a considerable amount of time studying the alternaliv ee Eor financing park acquisition and development Eor our community. Until re<ently, Che only al [ernative funding available for the City was either "pay-as-you-go," or a Mello Roos Community Fecil icier District. Neither of these alternativ ee vas totally acceptable as a cool for financing park acquisition and perk improv emenca. Nw, however, a nev • alternative ie available to the Cicy. In the lase session, the California Legislature amended [he 1972 Lendsca ping and Lighting Ac! co permit the acquisition, dev elopmenc, end maintenance of park si [es through Che use of a benef is asseeemenc program. The City of Rancho Cucamonga spearheaded the effort to enact ch is recent amendment [o the S[a[e Law. Because of the limited funds available for park dev elopmen! sod maintenance, it ie recoamended that [he City Council authorize [he staff [o initial: proceedings to form Park and Re crea [ion Improvement District I vhich will finance improvements and maintenance at tvo major common i[y parka, Heritage Park and Red Hill Community Park. Prior to set a6l iahing the park improvement district, it ie ae ce wary [o utilize the services of special Coun ee 1, financial coneul[ants, consulting engineers, patk designers, and our own city staff to compile the dace required for benefit sane semen[ program. RECOMMENDATION: I[ is recommended that the Eol low ing firma be hired by [he City in order co sari et the staff vith the formation of the Park and Recreation Improvement District I. Legal Counsel F. NecRenz ie Brwn Financial Consultants Piel loan and Rnlapp Engineers liil ldan end Associates Yark Designers Recreation Systems Inc. (R9I) Bond Undervritere Stone sod Youngberg -~ n City Council Staff Report Re: Formation Park Imprwement District January T, 1985 Page 2 All of [he above firms, with the ezception of RSI, have worked ae a team on the • Induetr ial Asee sammt District end the Alta Loma Chancel Asaeesment District. RSI bas completed place for several City parka. AC the time this report vas prepared, Firm coat set imetes were no[ available. This information rill be available prior to the January 2 Ci [y Comcil meeting. All costa incurred may be reimbursed to the Ci[y prw iding [he City Council adopts a reeolut ion eetabl ish ing a Special Improvement Pund for the proposed improvement district. Ic summary, [vo spec if is sct ions are pr opoeed for your cone iderationT 1. Authorize project teem ae recommended to proceed with the Formation of Park and Recreation Improvement Di attic[ I. 2. Approve the acts ched Resolution rhich establishes a Special Improvemeat Fund foz the proposed Park sad Recreation Imprw amen[ Diet rict. This will prw ids for reimbursement to the City for all coats incurred iE the district is ultimately eetabl iehed. LRSI :baa attach. - Resolution • LJ 73 RESAO: Yark S Rec:baa RESOLPITON N0. 8'!m' HS'~t:.1 A RESOLDTION OF THE CITY CODNCIL OP TAE CITY OF RANCII6 COCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SPECIAL IMPROYENRNT FOND FOR PARRS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (hereinafter referred to ae "City"), is now cone idexing [he formation of a ape cial aese esment district for Che construction aad installation of certain park improvements, toga that with appux tenan<ee and appurtemnt work in connection [herev i[h, pursuant to the prov isione of the "Landscaping aad Lighting Ac[ of 1972", beiog Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, cos®encing vit6 Section 22500, in a special assessment district known and deeigaa red ae PARR AND NECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMONITY PARR) (hereinafter referred to ae the "Aa se lament District"); and NHEREAS, at Chia time th ie City Council ie desirous [o eetabl ieh a special improvement fund for the purposes of advancing any monies oeceesary to pay for preliminary costa and expenses for consulting, staff of works of improvement, any such advances to De repaid from [he proceeds of bonds; end • WHEREAS, [hie City Council intends to finance the impravemente for said As ae eamenc District through the levy of aese semen[e and/ar [he iaeunnce of bonds purauaat co the prov ie ions of the °Improvement 0ond Act of 19!5", and being Division 10 of [he S[ree[e aad Highways Code of the State of California. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: SECTION 1. That fhe above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That this legicl at ive body does hereby set abl ieh a special Improvement Fund designated by [he name of this Ae ae lament District, into which funds may be transferred at any time to expedite the making of the improvement herein author iaed, and said funds ere a loan and shell be repaid out of the proceeds of the sale of bonds ea author iaed by law. PASSED, APYROPED, and ADOPTED th ie • day of January, 1985. HIES: NOES: ABSENT: Joa D. Mikela, ILyor 7~ V3LL VL • ~ l1V VVV[1113V~~VA MEMORANDUM August 6, 19gU C~ aTO~ `~~ Y ~~ x,~~\ ^~ I9Jr I T0: City Manager and City Councii FROM: 9obert A. Rizzo Assistant to City Nanager SUBJECT: Community :dantlty Street Signs • The Advisory Commission at a recent meeting voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council consider a standard street sign for the CSty. Thef.r suggestion vas to have the street signs vilth al: capital letters, block location, green background, and with reflective white lettering. Also, the City logo should appear on these signs with the Sdentity of each of the =ommunitiee as shcvn below: ~iG4.Nptir+ ~'~~~^ z ~pj~]~~~ „~~~pi'i'~ ` Y ~ ~iU Np,~ z ~. Cacamonga ~CU.ti1p~ ~`~~`;T _~ l\\`.> = ~~ z Z _crdanda RAR:mk 7J 1.111 V! Rtlly liRV VUliH1Y1 W1V liA MEMORANDUM DATE: December i9, 1984 C~C.~.i(rj .\~~~ 'r .~~~,\` ~,~. f~. 1 lUf9 TD: !dayor and 'Aembers of the C'r~~jj,,J/C~~uuncil FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner (~~l/~ BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Plan rkr SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE 1. J The intent of this memo is to explain the existing Oeve lopment Code policies regarding residential density ranges, master planning, and housing product type. The Development Code estab fished six residential development districts with density ranges based upon the General Plan land use designations (see attached). For example, the Low Residential District permits densities ranging from 2 to 4 dwelling units per acre. However, in the Low-Medium, Medium, Medium-High, and High Residential Districts, the developer may choose between two different categories of development standards -- Bas iC and Optional. Within these districts, the General Plan density ranges are further divided into tower and upper density groupings which correspond to a set of development standards for each grouping. This dual approach was created to address and mitigate the critical issues of neighborhood compatibility and proper transition of density associated within inf ill development. The approach is similar to the basic and optional standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan with one significant difference: The Etiwanda Specific Plan encourages projects to develop using the Optional Standards to achieve cdmmun ity goals far preservation of open space, rural character, etc. the Development Optional Standards were designed to ensure that projects at both the lower and upper end of their density range would have neighborhood compatibility. The Basic Development Standards are intended to provide a set of standards which will ensure good quality and comp at i6ility. For example, under the Basic Development Standards a project in the Low- Medium (4-S du(ac) Residential District could develop up to 6 du/ac. This density limitation, as well as the development standards, are intended to faster development which will be Compatible and provide for proper transitions rrom more sensitive or less intense surrounding existing residential neighhdrhodd s. W Memo to City Council December 19, 1984 • Page 2 The Optional Development Standards allow development at the higher end of the density range. These standards are intended to provide high standards for the development of projects of superior quality and compatibility. The Optional Development Standards are not designed to encourage higher density development; rather they are intended to carefully manage that density to ensure superior design, proper transition and compatibility with lower intensity surrounding existing residential uses. In addition, both the Basic and Optional Oeve lopment Standards must 6e used in conjunction with the Absolute Policies and Design GuidTines also contained in the Development Code (see attached). The actual density allowed in any residential project is determined through the Design Review process. With regard to Master Planning, the Development Code requires prep arat inn of a Master Plan for all areas specially designated on the General Plan and Development Oistr ict Map. Although there is no minimum or maximum size for these Master Plan areas, typically the Master Plan designation occurs in large, undeveloped areas, such as those areas around Ch affey College. The Master Plan process is intended to address • the unique characteristics of certain areas and to assure harmony between proposed and existing uses. In many cases, a variety of housing product types are proposed by a Master Plan to deal with site constraints and site opportunities. Pursuant to the Development Code Absolute Policies, proper transition may be needed from adjacent areas of lesser intensity. For example, if a Medium Residential site is located adjacent to existing single family residences, it may be appropriate to use duplexes or triplexes as a transition to condominiums or apartments as illustrated in the attached graphic. A combination of design techniques may also be used to provide density transition, such as open space setbacks, dense landscaping, architectural scale and mass, grade changes, etc. Large scale master planning of areas of 50+ acres may be appropriate to ensure variety of housing product type and architectural style to discourage monotony and address the housing needs of a divergent population. The Development Code and General Plan policies and guidelines require architectural variation and a range of housing product types (see attached). In conclusion, the Basic and Dpttonal Standards Absolute Policies and Master Plan process have been successfully used in the review of hundreds of projects since their adoption. These Development Code policies played a significant role during the appeal process on several highly controversial projects in 1984. Staff feels that implementation of these policies through the Development Design Review process provides a comprehensfve system of checks and 6a lances to assure nefghborhood • compatibility. RG:OC:ns ~~ '~~ x~ ``~ o ~ ~~} ~~ ,: ~~"-;>> ..~-. ~ w ~~ LL = N ~7'i ~+~' . \ =~ ~~~ ~- ,1 b 4 _ N 1 ~ ~ ~~ . n ""T~~.\ ~l'~ ~, ~ ~ ' i~ ` '.:. ~~ ~_~. ~tT-l // .~./_//,~.~ ' V 2 /i// 1~~y/I' y. V 4 ' N `~ ~.. ~ ~J ~i~ll N fir, J ~'^'S~ .~/ Yom' ,C~/ ~Ji '\~ ~ \\ )a~~ > A ~ ~/ ~ ~ p~ / 0 Section 17.08.040 B. Basic Develooment Standards. The Collowing table, Table 17.08.040-H sets forth minimum development standards Cor residential development projects filed up to the mid-point of the permitted density range. TABLE 17.08.040-8 BASIC DEVELOPl1fENT STANDARDS (rn =Not Rw010tOd1 YL L LM Y Mx 8 Lot Area: Minimum Vet Averegf :1,500 5,001 6,000 a/R N!R NIR Minimum Net 20,000 i~200 5.000 10.000 N'R N)R Numpe of OwHUry UNbe L'p to Up to Cp m Vp to Up to Up tp (p<[miR<E per <ercl 3 S 6 tt l9 X riNmum DweWrt Wut Sva Single femdy dercNM EweWnge only 900p1tp 900%)/tp, 900ayftp lot DimanaoR ~ . M~mmum bi@N 90evg. SLVg. ILvg. 10 NIR N!R 0 regmrM front veryLO vuSt3 very'SS +elpee¢I Mm. comer let ndt0 t00 20 s0 IS NIR N/R Mlmmum depl0 I50 100 90 100 NIR NIR SLmmum frontage 50 10 10 b NIR N/R (0 (font property pMl Mm. nag lo[ frontVa 20 M 20 10 N/R N/R (d (rent Pmoerty 4ne1 ~~~ F:ant Y<MO'c 10rvg. RSgvq. 20rv4. 23pq, N/R Nf8 vuyxs vuyt4 vvy:3 vuyt4 Comer Ada Yud 13 SS l0 l3 NIR N!8 Inlenor Ada Yad l0/l1 S/l0 S 100 NIR .Yl0. Rev ford 10 20 IS 100 NIR N/8 Private SVeet 11° 20° IOO 3f Se S< (veneple. put na Im tNnl At lntenw 10/5 Ow3 ISIS t1d/Sd t34']d t]d/30 Srte BouMery (D•eum¢ Gnw Sfpu<twrc `~ Pront to Fronl N/R N/H ES l0 10 00 OlTer NIR NtR l0 IS IS SS Nugpl lbolruag 13 13 13 1St i0t 35 _ lot COVOegf 23% l01 f0% 10% 30% 30% IMenmum %1 wm 9peff R<pur<d~ Pnvet< Op<n Spwe 2000/NIR 1000/N/R )00/ti0 I2S/130 ISO/t00 ISOyl00 (Ground floor L'Pper story Un61 Common Open Speee NrR N/R N/R 101 JO% ]0% pdinimcm DI lfeole Oo<n spe<ee 65'6 601 101 13% 11% 14- I Pr:ve:e Y Common) Pacrequan Ares/P<ediry N/R N/R N/R Rey,.+r<e v<r s«. r..w.ao-a LufYCepgq{ 1 aequlrfd per See. I*.oe.ao-e <. Evclueing lend necmuy for+econduy+treeb erN utaub. p. n1 morvred from WgmW ngMro(-way Ln<. verLale want yrd+Nlo•N punwnl to Section 1].01.060-H E Ado 10 feet d edleetnt t0 YL, L or LM duvmt. Lef INN 11 ffet from peaty of gdewNS reyulrca automatic /uy<doa apenfrf. L Limrt lrtary wrtnin 30 (M ay VLULOgVI<t 0. Pulmeta IIMlnptnq ur manor Rrot me+. N. A nPSb 6mtly deUeNld dweWn0la1 tNn 900 +quuf ffft wN nymn IM epprogl of • Condrti0N1 Uw Ptlmlt pef Seatlan 11.01.010. -78- 71 `~ Section 17.08.040 C. Optional Development Standards. The following table, Table 17.08.040-C sets forth minimum development standards for residential development projects filed up to the maximum density permitted by the density range. TAHLE 17.08.040-0 OFTIONAL DfiVELOPhIENT STANDARDS (N/6 ~ Not Beplvre0) L LY M Ytl Y Mwmum 814 Ar•[ SA6 SAC N/R N/R N,~R Igroul btAm Vui[[4n rcgwrcdmemglefwaY euGYVmaa N/R N/R (minimum nett Numper of ONe848 VuY UP 4 Vp to uD 4 UP to up 4 siryle Omar aeteelRd d.ewngs oNY OOOgitO 900egrt8 900.gft0 inl Dim~ltl® Minimum XidN VY411a1 rcgwred In mryle funny aedvulaa N!A N/R ($ rcgwred (rvnr u4eckl Minimum DeDtO YYIeNan re gwrcd in+in[le M1mil9 +rID0ltiftclu N/R N!R S11rUCeo Lo<el sv<a xoln x0/18• 2v2s SDns mraD (evereq</mm.l Prirue Suee[ SM 5• ]• 5• So IvvuDie, gut no ' lea l4nl At lnlenor N/5 l5/a 200/50 304'50 200/50 51t< Bwmduy (OneWng Vmt/ Accenory Bldq.l 0.m0entW &[Id4Y 9epuevaree Front rP Front 3a SS NiH N/R N/R Other x0 l0 N/R N/R N/R IJw4tiAN Pnvete Open Splp 1000/N/A 30P/150 225/350 l50/too 150/100 (Ground FIaoN Uppn Story Vnitl Common Opm Sp[a• S% 5% ]5% OS% a5% Imm~mum hl U4DU Opm 9pen• 00% 8% 10% 10% 10% (grvete eM common) Oeen.tlm Ara/PeaB14 N3R 0.pwred pu[Nrent 4 9eetlon 11.01.0100 _ RKmretl purwnt 4 Seeyon V.01.0/0-1 (rant YWI~R 0.egNrM pursuant 4 SeeVOn 11.08.010-8 ON NtYfA[Wyeaan N/R Regwrcd pu4uute 4 Secllon 11.08.010-N ExcluOinq lend nece54ry (or +<eondnry nrc<b Ntl utenW. 0. A< m<6tUr<d IfOm UNIm<4 rlgiltb('N<y Unl. Ref<r to ie01e It.01.0i0-D for IdOlianet utoecM informelion. e. Limit Htory waMn 50 feel a( VL or L Oorrmt. d. Add ID feet d sdlecept to VL, L or LN dalnel. Lev wen IS feet from Oeek of nd<w[W regwres eutomeuc gu[ge door openers. L Penmeter luauepin4 end m5<na tUeel lRO. g. A ungl< femJy deuene0 dweWng 1<v t0en 900 pave fe<t ndl regmn toe approval of a corMitlonel ux permit per Seelion 11,01.0]0. -77 ~j/~ Section 17.08.050 F. Lwdscepinq. Trees perform mwy essential fwetions for the com mwity: beauty, shading, wind protection, screening, noise buffering and air filtering. Plant material should be selected to achieve these purposes, while tolerant to factors such as wind, heat and low water. AR trees used must be consistent with adopted tree palette pursuant to the General Plan. The following table, Table 17.08.040-F, sets forth minimum stwdards [or the number and size of trees, both on- and off-site, as required in Tables 17.08.040-B and C; however, does not apply to single family detached or duplex dwellings. TABLE 17.08.040-P LANDSCAPE STANDARDS DI8 T R1CT FEATURE LM M MH H 1. k trees/gross acre 40 50 60 70 2. % box trees 10 20 30 30 3. % 15~allon trees 80 70 60 70 4. % 5 gallon trees 10 10 10 0 G. Recreation Area/Facility Where required, in Table 17.08.040-C developer shah provide recreational amenities in cronjunetion with common open space, such as, but not Bmited to, swimming pools and spas, court facilities (e.g. tennis, basketball, volleyball), etc. In addition, enclosed tot lot facilities with play equipment, end large open lawn areas ere required. All recreation areas or facilities required by this section shag be maintained by private homeowner's associations or private assessment districts. H. Ener~Conservati~on. Where required, in Table t7.08.040C this Section se ea forth requirements for energy conservation features. 1. New residential development shell be provided with w alternative energy system to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating wy swimming pool or spa. Solar energy shall be the primary energy system unless other alternative energy systems ere demonstrateA to be of equivalent capacity end efficiency 2. All appBwces and fixtures shall be energy conserving (e.g., reduced consumption shower heeds, water conserving toilets, etc). Section 17.08.050 Atrsolute PoBcies The Absolute Policies are intended to address the most critical issues associated with residential development. These include assuring neighborhood compatibility, compliance with adopted plans, adequacy of public facilities end services, end protection of the environment and public health. Each project must satisfy all absolute policies before approval can be granted. These policies ere used in evaluation of a residential project as described in Section 17.06.030 of [his Title. A. Plans k Policies 1. The Project is consistent with the adopted General Plan, Lend Use Plan, Development Code, and all applicable Specific Plans. 2. The Project is consistent wish the adopted Master Pien of Trails. _?9_ ~•/ Section 17.08.050 3. The Project is cronsistent with the adopted Parks end Recreation Plan. 4. The Project is consistent with the adopted Circulation Plan. B. Nef4hborhood Comnatitdlity 1. The Project is cuinpatible with end sensitive to the immediate environment of the site anu neighborhood relative to architectural design; scale, bul;t and building height; id+^Uty and neighborhood character; building orientation and setback; grading; end visual integrity. 2. The conRicts that ere presumed to exist between the propoecd development and surrounding land uses as described in Table 17.09.050-F pertaining to "Land Use Conflicts", have been effectively mitigated in the project design. 3. Tha Project is designed so that the additional traffic generated does not have significant adverse impact on surrounding development. C. Public Facilities & Services 1. The Project includes school facilities or adequate school facilities exist which are or wilt be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Written certification from all affected School Districts is required within ninety (90) days prior to the Cinal map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 2. The Project includes sewer and water facilities or adequate facilities exist which are or will be available to ,erve the project. Written certification from the affected sewer end water district required within ninety (90) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ane Regional {Valet Control Board and the City, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained end submitted to the City. 9. The Project includes street improvements end will generate traffic volumes resulting in a service level equal to or above level D (defined as a 95-95 percent volume to capacity ratio by the DKS traffic study). 4. The Project provides adequate access far emergency vehicles. 5. The Project provides storm drains, master planned drainage (acilities or special drainage facilities necessary to adequately dispose of surface water runoff or alleviate grading constraints. 8. The Project provides for a Homeowner's Association andi or lfaintenance District to ensure both on-site and oft-site maintenance. 7. The Project conforms to the access control policies of the General Plan regarding arterials. 8. The Project provides local feeder trials and community trails as required by the General Plan. -80- ~z Se^_tion 17.08.050 D. Public Health h Safety 1. The Project Ges within, or partially within, an adopted "Special Studies Zone"; a geologic report has been submitted which locates the presence or absence oC actual fault traces in accordance with the provisions of the 4lquist-Priolo Act, end special engineering precautions have been taken to overcome those limitations or these areas have been set aside from development. 2, The Project lies within areas subject to geologic hazards (i.e., slopes greeter than 4096, slope instability, soil erosion, ground failure), as rdentified in Figures V-1 end V-3 of the General Plen; en adequate geologic or soils engineering investigation has been submitted, and special engineering precautions have been taken to overcome those limitations or these areas have been set aside from development. 3. The Project lies within areas of Tujunga-Delhi soil association which may have soil bearing capabilities that could limit development, as identified in Figure V-2 of the General Plan, en adequate soils engineering investigation has been submitted which indicates the soils can adequately support the weight of the structure. 4. The Project is not on public sewers end Hes within areas of Friant Escondido end Ramona/Arlington soil associations which may not be suitable for on-site wastewater disposal, as identified in Figure V-2 of the General Plan, an adequate site specific investigation has been submitted that demonstrates the soils are suitable and the disposal of waste water will not degrade the subsurface water quality. 5. The Project is located within a flood hazard area, as identified in Figure V-5 of the General Plan, end special construction features have Deen incorporated into the design of structures. 6. The Project is located within a Pire hazard area, as identified in Figure V-8 of the General Plana a program Cor interim fuel management has been included to reduce the risk of [ire, and [ire mitigation measures (e.g., fire resistant building materials, site design which enhances fire access, etr..) have been incorporated into the project design per the requirements oP the Foothill Fire Protection Districe. 7. AH projects shall be within a seven (7) minute response time from a fire protection facility. If the project is not within that response time, then provisions must be made with the Foothill Fire Protection District for adequate fire protection. E, Resource Protection 1. The Project contains landforms of citywide significance (i.e., foothills defined es having slopes greeter then 10%, and Red Hill) and the project has been designed to minimize alteration of the landform through proper site planning, clustering, and following natural contours. 2. The Project is located within a major groundwater recharge area, es Identified in Figure IV-2 of the General Pian, and development has been clustered to promote infiltration end to maintain open space. ~~ Section 17.08.050 3. The Project contains streemside woodland associations, identified es a significant natural resource in Figure IV-2 of the General P'en, and site investigations have been completed, and mitigation measures proposed (including clustering) to mitigate impacts upon riparian community. 4. The Project is located on a site or contains a structure or other feature which is designated as a historic landmark, and provision has been made for preservation of said landmark in accordance with the Historic Preservation Ordinance. 5. The Project site is designated by the General Plan es Hillside Residential, and environmental studies have been conducted to determine land holding capacity and site development constraints, and the proposed density is no greater then two units per net buildable acre. 6. The Project site is designated by the Genera! Plan as Open Space, and development has been concentrated to preserve open space, and the proposed density is no greater than an average density of one unit per 40 acres. 7. The Project promotes energy efficiency through the use o[ energy efficient building design (e.g., south facing windows, energy conserving building materials end appliances, ete.l end site planning (e.g., east-west aligned wits, landscaping for solar access, etc.). F. Land Use Conflicts • The matrix in Table 17.08.090-F indicates the conflicts that ere presumed to exist between land uses. The types of mitigation measures listed in the following sections ere the design tools that should be employed either separately or in combination to mitigate existing or potential .and use conflicts. The Absolute Policies require that such conflicts be effectively mitigated in the project design. 1. Land Use Conflict Nitiga!ion Nessures (e) Open Space Setbacks. By providing an open space buffer between conflicting land uses conflicts can often be avoided. The width of the buffer required will depend on the severity et conflict and the extent of landscaping. To work effectively, the ownership, use, end maintenance of the open space buffer must be clearly defined. (b) Lendscaoin and To v re hic Chen es. As part of an open space bu er or as a treatment of land immediately adjacent to buildings, landscaping can he used to reduce conflicts. (c) Dense plantings of evergreens can provide a visual butter. (1) Sensitive landscaping can soften the sharp visual contrast between two abutting land uses by subduing the differences in architecture and bulk end by providing a gradual transition rather than a harsh edge between uses. (2) Dense growth of plants can be visually appealing but also can be used to discourage unwanted end unsafe pedestrian or bicycle access between land uses. -82- Section 17.00.050 (3) Landscaping can be used in crombination with other mitigation measures, such as reducing the width of open space buffer required end soften the visual conflict created by safety end security fences. (4) Recontouring of the land can alter views, subdue sounds, reduce glare, change the sense o[ proximity, and channel pedestrian travel. (d) Orientation. The strict spatial proximity between land uses and the apparent or functional proximity can be very different depending on the orientation of buildings end activities in the two land uses. (1) The buildings themselves can cause a buffer to be created by effectively turning their backs on each other - orienting views, access and principal activities away from the other land use. Care must be taken, however, that a hazardous and unaesthetic "no-mans" land is not created in the process. (2) Alternately, the intervening space can be eliminated altogether if the two buildings share a common back waB. (0) An entire site plan can be oriented so that the activities and functions are aligned hierarchicaLLy - placing those least compatible furthest Crom the common boundary between lend uses and those most compatible near that boundary (i.e., single story adjacent to single story). (e) Barriers and Alleviation. Ii may be appropriate and necessary to use physical Harriers to prevent the undesirable attributes of one land use from affecting the people and activities in the adjacent land use. (1) Fences, walls and berms can prevent the passage of people into areas that woWd be unsafe or insecure. (2) Light end noise can also be mitigated through physical barriers such as fences, walls, berms, screens and landscaping. (f) Architectural Compatibility. In addition to the architectural considerations involved in mitigation through orientation, the architectural design of buildings can reduce conflict and promote compatibility. (1) Materiels, colors, scale, end prominence of buildings in adjacent lend uses can be coordinated so there is a gradual transition from one land use to another rather then a sharp end displeasing contrast. Purely aesthetic details that are "tacked" onto a building to Grover up land use conflicts, however, will cause more harm than good. (2) The architectural compatibility should rise from a total consideration o[ the [unction of each land use and the Function of the space between them. _g0_ y!1 Section 17.08.050 (g) Circulation. Streets end parking areas can often serve to reduce certain types of land use conflicts. Separation of conflicting uses with a street or perking area can provide a buffer. TABLE 17.08.090-F -LAND USE CONPL[CTS LJ ~.....•.~~~.~~,r~. La nd Use Conflicts ~..~ ~.•.,, u..... fI vF ? T n....m r.uw..~nru. er .n~M C ~ ~.Or oCeS IC 5 . N r~1 d U ~ ~ ~~`~ 'r'°d°"' Lan ses c o ° y _ > ~ cesthe?~cs Ac',ve Recr~?:on I' " ~ ~ c G ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ pnvocy . a ° ° cccess C ~ G ~ X ~~•`~., LCw Denc,ty I ; ~ - ~ McderGte ~ i :` ~ D ~ c Ce^s~,ty i , ~ o '" L ~\ \ m o I Ins??uhoncl ~ II I S ~ a ~ ~ U Cffce,'9usness \I~~ 1 _~ i _ \/_ I l~ __..p I V/ ~ rk ~ c N E .x ~ I II x O U Ccr~merc'.c' I I Inc~s?nol I I I .. o ~_ Rcdrecd O o x ccr~~rg io•s I -- _ „o __ - ` , " _ ~i = ` ~ ~ ` ~ I /~ ~! n I ~ -ea- Section 17.08.090 C J. Air ualit . No operation or activity shall cause the emission of any smoke, fly • ash, dust, umes, vapors, gases or other forms of air pollution which can cause damage to health, animals, vegetation, or other forms o[ property, or which can cause excessive soiling on any other lot. No emission shall be permitted which exceeds the requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District or the requirements of any Air Quality Plan adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. K. Fire and Exblosi on Hazards. An operation or activity involving the storage of flammable or explosive materials shall be provided with adequate safety devices against the hazard of fire and explosion end adequate fire-fighting and fire suppression equipment and devices in accordance with the requirements of the Foothill Fire District Uniform Building Code, and Uniform Fire Code. Burning of waste materials in open fire is prohibited at any point. L. Fissionable or Radioactive Materials. No operation or activities shall be permitted which result at any time in the release or emission of any fissionable or radioactive materials into the atmosphere, the ground, or sewerage systems. M. Lyuid or Solid fVaste. No operation or action shall discharge at any point into any public street, public sewer, private sewage disposal system, stream, body oC water or into the ground, of any materials of such nature or temperature as can contaminate any water supply, interfere with bacterial processes in sewage treatment, or otherwise cause the emission of dangerous or offensive elements, except in accord with standards approved by the California Department of Public Health or such other governmental agency as shall have jurisdiction. • C Section 17.08.090 General Design Guidelines A. Intent. The intent of the guidelines is to assist the developer in understanding end complying with the City's standards for building and site design. The guidelines are based upon community design goals as expressed in the General Plan, end encourage the orderly and harmonious appearance o[ structures and property along with associated Facilities, such as signs, landscaping, parking areas, end streets. The guidelines establish a high standard for design quality but are Dexible enough to allow individual expression and imaginative solutions. B. Applicability. The provisions of this section shall apply to ell development within ell residential districts, unless otherwise specified herein. Any addition, remodeling, relocation or construction requiring a building permit within any residential district subject to Development/Design Review pursuant to Chapter 17.06 shell adhere to these guidelines where applicable. C. Site Plan Design 1. Existing Site Conditions. Natural features should be used to an advantage as design elements; such es, mature vegetation, landforms, drainage courses, rock outcroppings and views. Conversely, undesirable site features can be minimized through proper site planning end building orientation. L • -84- Section 17.0`...090 2. Building Orientation. Placement of the buildings shall be done in a manner C compatible with surrounding existing and planned uses and buildings. The setback from streets and adjacent properties should relate to the scale of the proposed building. ~ Larger buildings require more setback arcs [or e ba!anee of scale and compatibility with adjacent uses. Buildings should be oriented along a northsouth azis, as much as possible, to encouragE~ energy conservation. 0. Access/Circulation. The access and circulation should be designed to provide a safe and efficient system for vehicles and pedestrians. P~~ints of access shall comply with city access regulations and shall not cronf ,et with other planned or existing access points. Two points of access shall be provided for all but the smallest residential developments. The circulation system should be designed to reduce conflicts between vehi ~ular end pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on adjacent properties, com`nne access where possible, end provide adequate maneuvering areas. Curvili~ ear streets ere encouraged whenever possible. Vehicular end pedestrian traCic shell be separated, to the extent possible, through the use of a continuous system of public end private sidewalks. 4. ~ Areas. Parking areas should be designed to minimize visual Par kin ~ ~ ~ disrupt- ion of the overaLL project design. Parking areas should ne screened from streets through Lrombinations of mounding, landscaping, low profile walls end grade separations. The design of parking areas should also minimize auto noise, glare, and increases in ambient air temp erature. This • can be accomplished through sound wells, screening with fences or hedges, frees, end separation of parking spaces and driveways from residences. 5, Landscaping/Open Space. Landscaping and open spaces should be de:signed as an integral pert of project design end enhance the building deaf ;n, enhance public views and spaces and provide buffers and transitions where neoded. Landscaping should provide [or solar access and shade to facilitate energy conservation. 6. Fencing/Screening. Fences and wells ere discouraged ~mless needed for a specific screening or safety purpose. Where they are needed, color, material end variation of the vertical and horizontal planes ere needed to blend with the site end building design. The use of any fencing or walls should be consistent with the overall design theme. 7, Li htin Adequate on-site lighting should be provided to ensure a safe environment while at the same time not cause areas of intense light or glare. Fixtures and poles shall be designed end placed in a manner consistent end compatible with the overall site and building design character. 8. Utilities and Ancillary Equipment. On-site utilities end equipment shell be located in inconspicuous areas, away from public view. Where they are located in pubtlc view, they shell be screened with a combination of material that best suits the overall design theme. 9. Gradin Development should relate to the natural surroundings and minimize grading Dy following the natural contours as much as possible. E Grnded slopes should be rounded end contoured to blend with the existing terrain. Split-level pads, built-up foundations, stepped footings, etc., can be a di t , en used in areas of moderate to steep gr ~ ~ y y ~ c • ~7 V - ,_ Section 17.118.090 10. Fire Safety. Development should be designed in accordance with Fire • District requirements [or two points of safe end ready access. Areas designated as high fire hazard areas should minimize fuel buildup around residences through greenbelts or cultivated fuel breaks. D. Building Design 1. Design Theme. A recognizable design theme shall be established which is compatible with surrounding planned or existing developments and should be based upon prominent design features in the immediate area (e.g., trees, landforms, historic landmarks). Subtle variations are encouraged which provide visual interest but do not create abrupt changes causing discard in the overall character of the immediate neighborhood. It is not intended that one style of architecture should be dominant bu[ that individual structures shall create end enhance a high quality and harmonious community appearance. 2. Architecture. The achitecture should cronsider compatibility with surrounding character, including harmonious building style, Porm, size, color, material and roof line. Individual dwelling units should be distinguishable from one another end have separate entrances. Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, projection or recession of stories, balconies, reveals, and awnings contribute [o a building's character while aiding in climate rnntrol. Further, changes in the roof level or planes provide architectural interest. f 3. Scflle. The mass and scale of the building should be proportionate to the • l si[e, open spaces, street locations end surrounding developments. Setbacks and overall heights should provide en element of openness end human scnle. 4. Materials end Colors. Colors, textures and materials shall be coordinated to achieve total compatibility oP design. They should blend well with the environment and not cause abrupt changes. 5. Si in Every building shell be designed with a precise concept fcr adequate signing. Provisions Por sign placement; sign scale in relationship with building end readability shaLL be considered in developing the signing concept. While providing the most effective signing, it shall also be highly compatible with the building and site design relative to color, material and placement. 8. Equipment Screenin Any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building, or ground, shell be Screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally compatible in terms of material, color, shape, and size. The screening design shaLL blend with the building design. Where individual equipment is provided, a continuous screen is desirable. L • _gg_ ~~ • M E M O R A N D U M T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney DATE: November 2, 1984 RE: Comments upon Advisory Commission Recommendation on Campaign Financing and Controls for City .1 ion in his memorandum of September 19, 1964, Robert A. Rizzo sum- marized 19 areas that the Advisory Commission recommended the City Council consider for developing a campaign practices ordinance for the City. The purpose of this memo is to comment on each of those 19 items. • (1) "Coordinate with Fair Political Practice Law, (See Rose- ville ordinance , 2.60.30)" - Comment: The Political Reform Act of 1974 (Government Code §81000, et seq.), here.i Wafter referred to as "the Act" is the State law referred to. §81013 of the Act states that it does not prevent a local agency from imposing additional re- quirements on any person if the requirements do not prevent the per- son from complu-i rq with the Act. 12) "Use total expenditure control guideline from state stat- ute, modified for local suitability, i.e. maximum 51.00 per registered voter" - Comment: Campaign expenditure limitations were declared un- constitutional by the United States Supreme Court in Buckley -vs- Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 46 L.Ed.2d, 659, 96 S.Ct. 612 (1976). 131 "Leave initiative, referendum and recall control to state statute" - Comment: No comment is required. (4) "Limi.t total (aggregate) unidentified (under $100.00 there- -1 Yd fore anonymous) contributions to $1,000.00 excess to local charity of candidate's choice or to city if no charity picked" - Comment: The • City would have the option to do this. (5) "Limit anonymous contributions to $99.99, any single con- tribution in excess to go to charity or city as above" - Comment: This would conflict with State law. §84309 of the Act provides that an anonymous contribution of $100.00 or more shall be paid to the Secretary of State for deposit in the general fund of this state. (6) "Leave contributions $100.00 - $249.99 to state disclosure requirements" - Comment: No comment is required. (71 "Increase disclosure requirements on contributions of $250.00 - $999.99. (a) Individual; City of residence; Employer or field of employment, (b) Non-individual; Address; Type of organiza- tion; Formation date; Nuc~bEr of member=_; Whether individual contri- • butions are required to organization or candidate" - Comment: The City would have the option to do this. 181 "Forbid contributions of over $999.99" - Comment: The City would have the option to do this. 191 "Prevent aggregation tctalling required individual con- tributions (condition of employment, promotion of membership) against group or organization, and see P. 4 of Poway ordinance" - Comment: I am unclear as to what prohibition is intended. If the intent is to prohibit an employer from requiring an employee, or an organiza- tion from requiring a member, to contribute to a candidate, then to the extent that the same would not already be prohibited by State law, the City could do this. (10) "Desirable to allow surplus funds to 6e held only ninety • days after election, then distribute to charity or city takes and _Z 7 • prohibit all contributions more than six months before election" - Comment: This item presents two issues, the second of which appears to 6e "prohibit. all contributions more than six months before elec- tion". If this is what the Advisory Commission intends, then the concept is in my opinion unconstitutional as it could operate to pro- hibit lawfully declared candidates from receiving any contributions whatsoever. The first part of item 10, concerning the distribution of unspent campaign contributions to a charity or to the City could probably be adopted by the City. However, such a regulation would certainly insure that there would be no surplus campaign funds. (11) "Forbid contributions through blind intermediary or under assumed names" - Comment: This is already forbidden by §84301 of the Act. • (12) "Contributions by City contractors limited to 525.00" - Comment: The City could probably enact this limitation. However, would the limitation be $25.00 total, or per candidate? Also, peri- meters would have to be established so that it can be determined exactly when a oers on is, and ceases to be, a City contractor. (13) "Forbid contributions by developers between time sixty days preceding initial application and sixty days after final approval (recording of tract map)" - Comment: This subject matter is already covered to some extent by 884308 of the Act which prevents a direct or indirect acceptance, solicitation, or direction of a contribution of 5250.00 or more by any person who serves on a quasi-judicial board or commission from any person who has an application for a license, permit or other entitlement for use pending before the body upon which such person sits. Legislative bodies such as City (:ouncils arc exempted from Q84308. It would be within the power of the C~.t}~ _3- ~~rl to extend similar prohibitions to the City Coan~ii. • (14) "Authorize City Attorney to enforce" - Comment: This is impractical, as an appointed City Attorney holds office at the plea- sure of the City Council. This inpracticality is recognized in §91001.5 of the Act which permits enforcement of the Act only by District Attorneys and elected City Attorneys. A City ordinance could provide for a "special prosecutor" who would not be subject to removal except by unanimous vote of the City Council. (15) "impose very high penalties for violation - knowing = mis- demeanor" - Comment: State law provides that the maximum punishment which may be imposed for violation of a municipal ordinance is im- prisonment in the County Jail for six months or a fine of $1,000.00, or both. On the ether hand, willful violations of the Act are misde- meanors subject to penalties including a fine of the greater of . 510,000.00, or three times the amount the person fails to report pro- perly or unlawfully contributed, expended, gave or received. (16) "Leave uncontrolled committees to State law" - Comment: No comment is required. (17) "Require incumbents to publish total of anonymous gifts and all required disclosure information (names, etc.) from campaign in two newspapers with the highest circulation that are published with - in 25 miles of Rancho Cucamonga twice in the week before election" - Comment: If a requirement such as this is imposed, it should be im- posed on all candidates and not just incumbents. Imposing such a requirement only on incumbents would probably violate the equal pro- tection clause of the Constitution. i l ti t f i d id i d " • on e o s emeanor v o a Successful cand ate conv c m (18) loses council position" - Comment: I do not believe that this is ~3 • withir. the power of tha City. Matters concerning election and re- moval of municipal officers are governed by State law. Even in the case of a misdemeanor conviction under the Act, the successful can- didate is not removed from office. The person is only prohibited from being a candidate for elective office for a period of four (4) years following the conviction. (19) "Recommend Gardena ordinance as good starting point" - Comment: The City Council should decide what, if any, restrictions in addition to those imposed by the Act are desizable with reference to local conditions and not conditions which may have existed in other cities- RED ajo • _5_ rI 7 COVINGTON 6 CROWE iTO Pn cvs ni - Cn it ]^ WEST 5~%TM STREET aaa a,o>• PO S' OIF~CC Bo% ISIS o n.w wlo. uulo arvlw apex -' ~ October 25 1984 , - ~ ,« . s James Banks, Jr. BANKS b RLTC HIE Attorneys at Law Post Of _`ice Box 27R Ualand, Calif oraia 91786 Re: Camcaicn Financing Controls Dear Jim: Thank you for your letter of October 8, 1984. In your Letter you advocate the advisory comr?.i ssicn :ecom- • mendation that the City of Rancho Cucamo r. :a impose so r..e corm of campaign c-xoenditure limitar io rs apon ci b.~ eoune_1 candidates. You state that the purpose of the advisor" coom fission rn recom- mending expenditure limits is to Greve.^,t a wealthly can- didate from gaining an unfair advantage c•~ar others who are limited by our contribution restrictions." However noble your purpose may be, I am of the opi::ion that Buckley -vs- ': a1eo, 42' '~, 5. 1, 46 L.Ed.2d, 659, 96 Sct. 612 (1976) made it clear that any attempt to impose Limi[s on what one may spe.^,cl on his or her own campaign would be unconstitu- tional. In Buckley, among other things, the Court struck down the ceilirq on personal es:cenditures by candidates on their o:: ,-, behalf which the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 had im- posed upon candidates for Federal office. In doing so, the Court, at 424 U.S. 52-54, observed "The candidate, no less than any other person, has a first amendment right to engage in the discussion of public issues and vigorously and tirelessly to advocate his own election and the election of other candidates . section 6081a)'s ceiling on personal expenditures by a candidate in furtherance of his own campaign thus clearly and directly interferes with constitutionally protected freedoms." Rejecting a justification for the limits similar to that advanced in }•our letter, the Court stated "The ancillary inter- • est in equalizing the relative financial resources of candidates competing for elective office, therefore, provides the sole relevant rationale for section 608(a)'s expenditure ceiling. C James Banks, Jr, October 23, 1984 - Paqe TWO . That interest is clearly not sufficient to jcstify t!:e prop: is ions infringement on fundamental :first amendment richts." In Suck ley the Court. also struck down the iadecendeat azc=_^.- diture provisions of the r'ederal Elect ioa Campaign Act. Nothing I see in Buckley ~,aould permit a distintt~on based upon the fact that a person is a candidate for local or state office instead of Federal office. Under the circumstances I do not believe it appropriate fcr me to recommend that the City Council adopt camoaian exile nditare limitations when any attemut tc enforce such limitations might involve the City in a cost:.: 51933 action. \'o ry tru i_: }'ours, CO'v'I ::GTONs CROi:E, ~_ ' RCERT E~70009iRTY . city ttorney far the C ay Of aa:':F.O CL`Cam~^.Cd RED:sjo cc: Mr. Robert 2. Rizzo, Assistant to the City >tanager City of Rancho Cucamonga L Tom" f.~~ed I TL1~ --- OIT1 OF BA~CHO OUC3~fOtiGP. c,~c.~•~igi, ~~ ~CY STAFF REPORT zv~r y,~ IA GATE: Jani:ary 2, 1985 iv„ Tp; City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer 6Y: Barbara Kr all, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: Apprnv al of Suhor dination Agreement from Alexander and Joyce Frazin for project lcc ated at 8817 Strang Lane A lien Agreement for the installation of curb, gutter, asphalt pavement and appurtentant work was approved by City Council on March 7, 1984. In order to secure financing for the project, the tender requires that the Lien Agreement he subordinate to a lien in favor of the lender. Mr. and Mrs. Frazin have submitted the attached Subordination Agreement for City Council approval. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving said Subordination Agreement and authorizing the Mayor to sign same. Resp tfully submi ted, a B : Atta(((ch///ments r - -~ f ~ Subdrdggmt SUBOROIXATIOX AGREEMENT MOTILE: THIS SUBOROINgi ION AGREEMENT RE SVLTS IN YOUR SECVRI7Y INTEA EST IN iNE PROPEfl 7Y BECOMING SUBJECT TO pNO LONER PRIOpITY 7NAN THE L[EN OF SOME OTHER OR LgTER SECURITY INSTRUMENT. THIS AGREEMENT, made th15 2][h day or OECEMRER Iq e4 by 'AIL%ANOfR L. 6 JOYCE A. FRA2T.Y ~ . owner a the and herein ter descn a an erelna ter re erred Cn as 'Owner' and the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter referred tp as 'C1ty", owner and holder of the Certain Real Property and Lien Agreement he rein a/tar referred to as 'Lien Agreement'. NI TNESSETH TNA7 NNE2Eq$, ALE%ANDF.q L. 6 JOVCE A. FRAZ SN Gated JANfARY 19 1984 cdvlring: see ezhiblc 'A' +teaened ryereco and made a prtt hereof. t0 slLUr! A Iles cmn[[ae[ ;or certain read Lnprovmten[a white was re<mr a nARni ], m the 0 is sal Records of said County; an NNEREAS, owner has esecuted a deed of trust and note in the sum Of ONE HHNOREn FIt'rY TNOCEANII 90LV.R5 6 NO CEN[s ($150.000.00) date n av or of a1nAASlN/AMERt AN E%PPESH MOR A h!rlipaf tlr re !ne o as Lender payaD e w to n[eres[ and upon Che terms and coedit tons described therein, which deed of trust is to De roc ordetl concurrently herewith; antl RNEREA S, it 1s a condition precedent to nod5fyin9 said loan that said deed of Crust last abd ve nentioned shall uncond itonally De and remain at all t1m<s a lien or charge uDdn the land heretnbe/are described, prior and su peri0r to tht Ilan or ch arye of the Lten Agreement; and NNEREAS, lender 1s willing to nodify said loon provided the deed o/ trust recur tng the same is a lien ar charge updn the above described property prior to superior to the Ilan or charge o/ the Lf en Agreement and provided that Clty will sDe<f/scat ly and uncondi t{ovally suborolnate the lien or charge of the Lten Agreement to toe lien or charge of the deed of trust to favor Of L<nder; and NNEREAS, It 1s the mutual benefit of the parties hereto that lender modify said loan to Owner; and City 1s willing that the deed o/ trust securing the same shall conic itute a Ilan or charge upon Bald land whim Is uncondlt ton oily prior to sub erlor to the lien or charge on the Llen Agreement, NON. THE0.EF OR E, in consideration Of the mutual bane/its actor leg to tn0 Dart ies hereto and other valuable cons idarat ion, tAe receipt and suff lciency of which cons ideratlon is hereby acknowled 9ed, and in order to induce Lender to nod tfy the Idan a ~OVe referred to, it Is Aefeby declared, understood and agreed as fol lays: (1) That said deed of [rust securfng said note in savor of Lender and any renewals or a%t ens ions there oi, snail unconditionally De and renain at all times a Ilan or charge <n the property therein de striped prior and superior to tAe Iten or charge of the Lfed pgreament. (1) That Lender uouid not and ify its loan above descrlbe0 without tMa su bor dinat ton agreement. (3) That this agreement shall be the whole and only agreement with regard to the su bordn at ion pf the lien or charge pi the lien Agreement [o the lien or charge of the deed of trust in /avar of Lender above referred to and shall supersede and cancel, but only insofar as would at sect the priority Detr een the deed of trust and Lien Agreement any prior agreements as to such subordination incluafng, but not limited tp. those pr pv iitons, if any, contained in the Lien Agreement rhi<n provide for the su bordina[ion of the lien or charge thereof to another deed or deeds of trust or to another mortgage or mortgages. The City declares, agrees and acknowledges that: (a) Ne eonse nts to and aDprov es all provisions of the note and deed of trust in Nvor of Lender aDOVe referred to Dy to at certain mpdificat ion agreemeus by and between Owner and Lender, dated (D) Ne int entlonally and unconditionally raives, rel inAvisnes and subordinates the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement in /avar o1 the lien or charge upon sale land of the deed of trust in lavor of Lender above referred to and understands that in reliance upon, and in cons lder at ion pf this waiver, relinpuishment and subordination specific loans and advances are DeSng and rill be made and as a part and parcel thereof, spe<H1< monetary and other obligations are being and will De entered into rhich would mat De made or entered into Dut for said reliance upon this waiver, relinyu ishment and su DOrd ina[f on; and (c) An endorsement Aas been placed upon the Lten Agreement that said Lien A9reemenL Aas Dy this instrument 6e<n subordf mated to the lien or charge of the deed of trust In favor oT lender above referred td. NOTICE: TNIS SUBOR OINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A PA OVI SION NHICM ALLOYS TXE PERSON OOL IGAT EO OX YOUR REAL PROPERTY SEC UAITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN, A PORTION Of NNICN MAY 0E E%PENOEO i0R PURPOSES OTNEA THAN IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND.~~~~~~ pp~~ 1'i .Y,'nH ~.~NyVW. sa o'e 'e`t a~ O ~~f'~3ME ~ s~j ALL SIGNATURES MUST RE MOTARIIED Improved real propeety cwmnonly known as. gel] Strang Lane Rancho Wcamonga, California 91101 end more particulacy described as Eollous PARCEL 1 6xh 16 ie "A" the cu cerly 15o fee[ oL the westerly 890 Eeet of the Sou ch half of all the port ion of lo[ 4, Mock 1J, Cucamonga Nwntead Aaeo[ia ti on VM, ea per p lax record to book b, page 46 of maps In die of [Ice of [he County 0.ecorder of vtd County. Lying Southerly of a line drawn pau llel eo [Be Northerly I1ne of said le[. the Norchves terly comer of sold parcel be Lng a point equ t-distance Eton [he Northwest corner and [he Sou chvee[ corner of said lot. gxcc pc ing there frwn all water and octet rvgh [e. PARCEL 2 A n -exclua [v< easement for road pu ceases over [M1e gm.[N JO fee[ of ehe Ner[h 16y feet of the Nesc 165 Eeef of all chat pertlon of Lot 4, Block 1J, Cucamonga Haneateed As sot la[fan lend as per map r ca[ded to Book 6, Psge 46 of maps, San Bernardino County reco[da, ly tngegw cherly of a I the drawn parallel to north of as td lat. ehe Noc chwca terly corner of cold parcel being a[ a point equf-distance Er® [he Norttrvea[ corner and Nouthveat corner of aerie lot. PA0.cfL 3 A n -egclm [ve eaaeaen[ Eor roatl pu rpoa¢a a r the South JO feet of Che gnat n565 feet of the Neat gJ0 feee of the North half of ell that porbfon of lo[ 4, block 1J, Cec monger Homee[cad Aa sot lotion 4nd~ as per map cord book 6, page 46 of maps San Bema[d lno County rec ocds~ ly tng bonthcrly o[ • Lfne drawn paullet to the Northerly line o[ as ld to [. 'Ile Narthvea terly corner o[ as ld perccl being a[ a pofnc equ i-d is [ante [tom the Ner[hwest mtnar of the Soo [Nveae corner o[ as td lp[. RES OL ~IT ION .l0. E9i=92=04R ~~~ - ~ `~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO U7C IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBDRDIiJATION AGREEh1ENT FROM ALE HANDER ANO JOYCE FRAZIN A"7D AUTH OR IZ I'JG THE iMYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SA14E 'WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of curb, gutter, asphalt paving and appurtentant work along Strang Lane was approved by City Council on March 7, 1984 and recorded in San Bernardino County on March 27, 1984, Instrument No. 84-670438; and WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project, the lender requires that the above-mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 6y the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordinate Agreement be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 1985. AYES: NOES ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, tAayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk ,{aa .~ Bra' F. MAC KENZIE BROWN orv0 OOx nOCO SsN O 16191 ) CnE RJ wPC [ R9A R C c PZL 1)1s1 B56~S99w wnPRED B OV BE VP ni vn.. nv 1+ ~ 111 Jf 95999 RANCHO SANTA FE. GLIFO RNIA 9206] ~os nuc ues lz ul sez ~)Js December 19, 1984 - Lauren Wasserman, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 801 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Lauren: Enclosed herein please find proposed Amendment to the "Land scaoinq and Lighting Rct o` 1972", which would provide a 30-day statute of limitations. The purpose for this is to provide a period of time in which a challenge must be filed; otherwise, the challenge would be barred by the 30-day period. This would bring the "1972" assessment statute in conformity with the provisions of the "Improvement Act of 1911" (30-day ch al le nqe period), the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" (30-day challenge period), and the "Mello-Roos Community facilities District Act of 1962" (30-day chal le nqe period). The courts have upheld the validity of the 30-day statute of limitat igns, and I would recommend that in order to preserve the integrity of the municipal financing market and to guarantee to purchasers astable security, that the 30-day statute of limita- tions section also be added to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912". If yoq.~ave any questions, please call. Yery tr/ yours, M4CKENIIE BROWN FMB:bd encl. PROPOSED PMENDMENT TO "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING AC7 OF 1972" THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS; SECTION 1. Section 22fi62.5 is added to the Streets and Highways Code, to read: "22562.fi. The validity of an assessment levied under this part for the purpose of raising revenue necessary to pay the debt service on hoods issued pursuant to Section 22662.5 shall not be contested in any action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding is commenced within thirty days after the initial assessment is levied. Any appeal from a final ,judgment in such an action or proceeding shall be perfected within thirty days after the entry of ,iudgment." SECTION 2. This act is an urgency statute neces sar,y for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety within the me aninq of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts consti- tuting the necessity are: In order to provide necessary certainty anA stability to the potential purchasers of hoods issued pursuant to the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately. RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR PARKS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT OISTRIC7, WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as "City"), is now considering the formation of a special assessment district for the construction and installation of certain park improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19?2", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califofnia, canine nci ng with Section 22500, in a special assessment district known and designated as PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMl1N 1TY PARK) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"): and, WHEREAS, at this time this City Council is desirous to establish a special improve- ment fund for the purposes of advancing any monies necessary to pay for preliminary costs and expenses for consulting, staff or Works of improvement, any such advances to be repaid from the proceeds of bonds: and, WHEREAS, this City Council intends to finance the improvements for said Assessment District through the levy of assessments and/or the issuance of bonds pursuant to the provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That this legislative body does hereby establish a special IMPROVEMENT FUND designated by the name of this Assessment District, Into which funds may be transferred at any time to expedite the making of the improvement herein au thori zcd, and said funds are a loan and shall be repaid out of [he proceeds of the sale of bonds as authorized by law. APPROVED and ADOPTED th i5 day of 1985. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORN?.4 A TTES 7: I Y LRK CITY OF RANCHO CUCnMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA [ltl3$] tlIN803I1tl7 30 31tl1S tl9NOWtl707 OH7Ntl8 30 A117 %IN310 AlI7 •eluuo;ILe7 `e DU Owe m7 oy~ue8 1e `S861 ;o A'ep slyl 031073%3 S839W3W 117N007 ~NItl1S8tl S838W3W 117N007 ~1N3 S9tl S839W3W 1I7N007 ~S30N S838W3W 117N007 ~S 3Atl :a;on duiMOLLO; ay1 6q Pa;dope pue passed seM awes ay7 1ey1 pue `SgyL' ;o A'ep ayl uo pLay Ly~uno7 AlFO DLes ;o tiul7aaw a41 7e lLe `~ual7 F1L7 a47 Aq Pa1sal;e Due `ao6ep ay; 6q pautiis pue panoudde `Llouno7 F;17 ayl A'q pa;dope pue panoudde `passed A'Lnp sen •oN uol;nLosaB tiulaq `uoy;nLosaB tiulo6auo; ay1 1e47 A3I1tl37 A8383H Da `tlI N803I 1tl7 `tlBNOWtl707 OH7NVN !0 A117 a47 ;o A8310 Al[7 'NtlWi13SSNM 'W N3 L'Otll `[ tl9NOWtl707 OH7NtlN 30 AlI7 ONIOHtlNtl38 NVS 30 A1N000 VIN903I 1V7 30 31tl15 1 .~ M E M O R A N D U M T0: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager PROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney DATE: December 27, 1989 RE: Ambulance Ordinance ~C~TI' OF RANCHO UCAM1~GNGq ~{~ ADMINISTRn7{ON OEC 28 KJB~{ AY 7!8j9jn{ll{tt{11~3~g{S 6 Under the "Emergency Medical Service System and the Prehospi- tal Emergency Medical Care Personnel Act" (Health and Safety Code §1797, et seq.) the Health officer of San -ernardino County is the authority for regulating Prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in both the unincorporated and incorporated areas of the County. Under A- 3153, a copy of which was sent with Dr. Pettersen's letter, the Health Officer as the "Local EMS Agency" now has the power to directly restrict competition between EMS providers by creating one or more "exclusive operating areas" within which EMS services may be restricted to one or more EMS providers. Prior to AB 3153's effective date, which is January 1, 1985, a local EMS agency was unable to restrict competition among EMS pro- viders, except as the same could 6e accomplished indirectly such as by denying certification to a proposed EMS provider. Under the law as it exists prior to January 1, 1985 cities have jurisdiction to regulate non-EMS ambulance services within their territorial boundaries, and presumably, the authority (previous anti- trust implications aside) to restrict competition by requiring a finding of public convenience and necessity before a new provider would be franchised. After January 1, 1985 cities will still have the power to regulate non-EMS ambulance services, but, ir. my humble opinion, state law will have preempted the City's ability to restrict competition among EMS providers, Rancho Cucamonga's proposed ambulance ordinance, in its pre- sent form, does not restrict competition among non-EMS or EMS ambu- lance providers. The principal effect of the ordinance is to re- quire any operator who wishes to provide non-emergency ambulance ser- vices within the City to also provide to the City emergency ambulance services at the level specified in the ordinance. The puritanical motive for such an ordinance, which I have heard expressed, is that any provider who wishes to skim the "cream" of non-emergency medical transportation should be required to share the "burden" of providing the citizens of the city with available emergency medical transporta- tion. This issue is, of course, one of policy and I, therefore, do no more than state it. The thrust of Dr. Pettersen's December 7, 1984 letter appears to be a desire on his part for the County to take oven the admini- stration of programs to regulate the providers of non-emergency as well as emergency ambulance services in the incorporated as well as the unincorporated areas of the County, If the City were amenable to so contracting with the County, then it would be advisable to re- solve any areas of conflict between the County's ambulance ordinance and the City's proposed ambulance ordinance. In fact, the advisable alternative, should the City desire to contract with the County, wou13 be to incorporate the County Ambulance Ordinance by reference into the City's Municipal Code. On the other hand, if the City is not interested in contracting with the County for ambulance regula- tion services, then all of the alternatives listed in your December 18, 1984 letter. are available. I will make no recommendation as to 'Z- which alternatives should be chosen by the City Council, and I will only explain the effect of each choice. Because the County xealth Officer has refused to certify Canyon Medical Services as a para- medic provider, adoption of the ordinance on January 2, 1985 would have the effect of requiring that company to cease operating ambu- lances within the City as of February 1, 1985. If the proposed ambu- lance ordinance is not adopted by the City Council, Canyon Medical Services could continue to do business in the City as a non-emergency ambulance service provider. RED:sjo -3-