The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985/02/06 - Agenda PacketCUCA,L1~ '~ ~~ QTY OF ~' ' ~; /R+r,~~~v{ca~l~o jc~u/~cI~n~o~r/•r~cfTn r r `l~1 I TI~A,~JI/iVl.1L LYl~~Lf1 1977 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Beee Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Nedne sday, February 6, 1985 - 7:30 p.m. All iteau enbmitted for the Ciq Comcil Agenda >oat be in ~ri[ing. The deadline for wbmitting thoe iteau is 5:00 p.m. on the Vedneaday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk'• Office reeeivo all ouch items. 1. CALL ZO OYDNI A. Pledge of Allegiance to Plag. • B. Roll Call: Gr fight Buquet , Mikele _ Dahl _, and Ring C. Approval of Minutes: December 5, 1984; December 19, 1984; January 2, 1985; and January 16, 1985. 2 . 1N11O0lC W ~11't8/PYRg6OrASI0A9 A. Thursday, February 7, 1985, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COlOIISSION, Lions Park Community Center. R. Nedneeday, Pebruary 13, 1985, 7;00 p.m. - PLANNING COlOlISSION, Liana Park Commun i[y Cancer. 3. CDIISEIIT CALE1Okl The follwing Comenf Calendar items are effected to be rwtine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon 6y Che Comeil at one tiara rithwt diawuion. A, Approval of Narrante, Register No's. 85-02-06 and .~ Payroll ending 01-02-85 for the total amount of $813,714.34, r1 City Council Agenda _p_ B. Approval and adoption of criteria for lending agencies for the 1985 Resident ial Mortgage Revenue bond Program rhich all pan is ipating lending agencies must conform to for the proposed Bond Program. RESOLUTION N0. 85-15 February 6, 1985 9 ll A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCLL OF TFIE CITY OF RANClIO CUGMONGA, GLIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPATION EY LENDERS IN THE CITY OP RANCRO CUCAMONCA BOME MORTGAGE FINANCING PROGRAM r1 LJ C. Approval to award contract for design services of is Archibald Avenue Sideralk Improvements be Green ease Line Road and Foothill Boulevard to C C Engineering, sad authorize ezecut ion of [he agreement in the amount of 59,340 plus IOI for coa[ingeaciea from the TDA Article 3 funds allocation. D. Approval of Bonds, Agreement, and Final Nap of Tract 12091 located an the east aide of Grove Avenue ac 8th Street submitted by Rancho Verde Development. RESOLUTION N0. 85-1fi A RESOLUTION OF TEIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GLIFORNIA, APPROV P7C IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECORII'i, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 12091 E. Approval of Bonds and Agr semen[ for Tracts 12590-1 through 6 located on [he north aide of Baee Line Road and east side of Haven Avenue submitted by Lewis Homes of Cal ifornie. RESOLUTION N0. 85-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF tllE CITY OF RANCNO COCAHONGA, GLIFORNLA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IlH~ROVEMENT SECURITY, AND PINAL NAY OF TRACT NOS. 12590-1, 12590-2, 12590-3, 12095-4, 12095-5, AND 12590-fi F. Approval of Bosde, Agreement, and Final Map of Tract 11781 lots [ed on the west aide of Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street end Highland Avenue aubm icted by Daly Construction. ~5 36 37 46 47 City Couvcil Agevda -3- February 6, 1985 RESOLUTION N0. 8$-18 5~ A RESOLUTION OF 'IHB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCBO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IlffROVEMENT SECURITY, AND PINAL NAP OP TRACT N0. 11781 G. Approval of Bcnd e, Agreement, and Su®ary Vacac ion of 50 Tract 12621 located on the south side of Arrow Rouce be [weep Nadrone and Baker Avenues subm i[[ed by Richwood Development Company. RESOLUTION? N0. 85-19 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCAO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OP TRACT N0. 12621 RESOLUTION N0. 85-20 71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF kAliCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OP A PORTION OP RICNw00D DRIVE • N. Approval of Releasing of Bonds and Filing Not :ce of 7/i Completion: Parcel Mao 6051: located on Burlwood at Hanzani[a by Nelson Construction. Re lea ae Improvement. Securiey $13,600 Retain for Labor 6 Material Guarantee $ 6,800 RESOLUTION N0, 85-21 J6 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNLA, ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL NAP 6051 ANO AUTRORI2ING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE wORR I. Approval of Bonds end Agreement for CAP 83-22 located 77 on the soucheaet corner of Aelme and Hampshire S[reece submitted by Allsire Rancho Cucamonga. Release previously submitted bonds by Blanco Security Storage, Ltd. City Council Ageada -4- February 6, 1985 Release Faithful Perfot~ance Bond $32,000 Release Labor b Material Bond $16,000 • eES0L1R'I 0N N0. 85-22 83 A RESOLOTIOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ItANCRO CUCAMONCA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 83-22 J. Approval [o accept Offer of Dedication of a 30-foot Bs vide portion on Landon Avenue, a north/south street, located east of Archibald Avenue on the north aide of Lemon Avenue. RESOLUTION N0. 85-23 8i A RESOLUTION OF TBE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A 30-FOOT DEDICATION ON CORDON AVENUE AS OFFERED POR AIGRNAY AND ROAD POHPOSES K. Approval of a Subordina cion Agreement submitted by Fred 88 Jan¢ for his proper[q located at 9942 Almond Street. RESOLUTION N0. 85-24 91 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORD'_NATION AGREEMENT FROM FRED JAN2 dtiD AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO S C N SAME L. Approval of consul[ ant contract with Linville, Civil 92 Engineers/Surveyors, Inc. for [he reconstruction of Hermosa Avenue, 130 feet south of Mignons [[e S[reeC, co Nine [e enth Street. Contract not to exceed $3,950. M. Approval of in cent [o annex Tract Noe. 12320, 12490, 102 11606-1, 10046, 10047, and 12721 to Serest Lighting Ne is tenance Dietr ic[ Nos. 1 end 2 ae Amese cion No. B and No. 6 re ape cc ively and setting the publ. is hearing Ear March 6, 1985. RESOLUTION N0. 85-25 113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCAO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEKATION N0. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING NAIHTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 (TRACT NOS. 12320, 12490, 11606-1, 10046, 10047, end 12721) _ City Council Agenda -5- February 6, 1985 RESOLUTION N0. 85-26 114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO-NCIL OF TEE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEEATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEIlATION AS ANNE7UTION N0. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 1; PURSUANT TO TEE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR BEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO AESOLllTION N0. 85-27 ~?7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COD NCIL OF TBE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT POR ANNERATION N0, 6 TO STREET LIGRTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (TRACT NOS. 12320, 11606-1, 10046, 10047, 9619) RESOLUTION N0. 85-28 1_8 A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEZATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ;, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SA.D ANNERATION AS ANNERATION N0. 6 TO STA"_T LICATING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSC A):T TO TAE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 15-2 AND OFFERING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO N. Approval of incept to annex Trac[ Nos. 11320, 12490, 1=0 Ilfi-6-1, 10046, 10047, 12721, and 9619 Co Landscape Ma incenance Die[r ict No. 1 ae Annexation No. 21 and ae Icing [he public hearing for March 6, 1985. RESOLUTION N0. 85-29 17R A RESOLUTION DF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CllCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNERATION N0. Z1 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. l (TRACT NOS. 12320, 12490, 11606-1, 10046, 10047, 12721, AND 9619) ,~ City Council Ageode -b- February 6, 1985 RESOLUTION N0. 85-30 [39 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP eAN000 COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS IATENTION TO ORDER THE ANNERATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNERATION AS ANNERATION N0. 21 TO LAN-SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSDANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AN- OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 0. Appzov el of a Resolution acknowledging Nat ionai 14F Engineers' Week February 17 -23, 1985 io be cel ebraced by the Nat iooal Society of ProEesaional Eng insets. RESOLUTION N0. 85-71 148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACRNOWLEDGINC NATIONAL ENC INFERS' WEER FEBRUARY 11-23, 1985 BY THE NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS P. Approval of an application for flank of American Card 144 Service. 1ESOLUTION N0. 85-72 149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODNCIL OF TILE Ct `.Y OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APYROV I::G APPLICATION FOR BANK OF AMERICAN CARD SERVILE Q. Approval to forward claim (CL85-02) against the City by l52 Tommy Hirai for auto damage encouat eyed at Be se Line and Archibald to Carl Wei ten Company, insurance carrier. R. Alcoholic Beva~tage Application (A885-O1) for on-Sale l83 Beer and Wine for Pepperm Tat Eiaphaac Restaurant, 10174 Pooth ill Blvd. S. Sec public bearing for Fabruarq 20, 1985: ___ Env iroamental Ae ee aeme~t and General Ylan Amendment 95-02. An amendment [o the Public Bealth and Sa£ety Elemenc co provide consistency vith State taw provisions of the Alquiet-Priolo Act, ae amended. ;~ City Council Agenda -7- February 6, 1985 T. Se[ public hearing for March 6, 1985: Consider the floue ing Yol is iee Report and policies of the Ci[y of • Rancho Cucamonga, as required by [he Internal Revenue Code See[ion 103(A) ae they relate [o housing aaeietance, and the propo eed 1985 Residential Mortgage Revenue Bond. U. Approval of Re imbursemeat-Lien Agreement with En Agape 154 Fel lovsh ip Ca construct a por [ion of Nineteenth Street at Beryl et rest in conjunction with the Beryl-Nel loran Storm Drain. Amount of Agr semen[ - $13,020.10. P. Approval of an egx semen[ Eor the preparation of CCARs 16^_ v i[h Richvood Development as a prerequisite for further approvals of Tract No. 12621 located at the south side of Arrov Righvey be tveen Baker and Madrone Avenues. RESOLUTION N0. ES-33 16S A REBOLUTION OP THE CITY COllNCIL OF TBE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT NITN RICRNOOD DEVELOPMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OP CCARS FOR TRACT N0. 12621 N. Approval to authorize issuance of bonds, filing of 156 validation action, and approving contracts with Wit ldan Aa sociates (to complete Financial Administrative O se rv ice e) and with P. Mackenzie Brown, Inc. (to act ae Bond Counsel). RESOLUTION N0. 85-34 l77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE GF CERTAIN BONDS TO FINANCE FACILITIES TN A C014(DNITY PACILITIES DISTRICT 4 ADVERTISED PDBLIC HEARINGS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMCNT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84-OS CARYN COMPANY - A development Dietr ict Ammdme¢t to prezone uniocorporeted ter ritorq ea "Caryn Planed Community" for apptoaimately 240 acres of land, located be tveea the ext eneion of Banyan Avenue end Highland Avenue on the north and south, end be [veen [he extension of Ra [heeler S Milliken Avenues on the east and vest, APN 225-141-08, 12-19, 21 -28, 225-151-01 through 03, 0), 08, 10-13. City Council Agenda -8- February 6, 1985 ORDINANCE N0. 246 (aecand reading) 180 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAHONGA, CALIPOHAIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE N0. 84-OS TO PREZONE THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION AS "CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY" AND ADOPTING THE DEVELCPMENT PLAN FOR APPROEIMATELY 248 AC&ES, LOCATED BETWEEN TAE EATENSION OP BANYAN AVENUE AND NICIQ,AN- AVENUE ON THE NORTH AND SODTR AND BETWEEN THE ERTENSION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND HILLIREN AVENUE OF TflE EAST AND WEST B. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - CARYN - A Development Agreement 182 be tveen the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Caryn Developmenc Company, Kaufman and Broad Land Company, and Mari borough Development Corporation relative co properties located be [wean the extension of Banynn Avenue and Highland Avenue on [be north end south, and be [veers [he ascension of Rochee[et and and Milliken Avenues oa the east and we at - APN 335-141 -08, 12-39, 225-151-01 through 03, 07, 08, 10-13. ORDINANCE N0. 248 (f ira[ reading) 207 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAR 4N DEVELOPMENT COlO?ANY, RAUFlIAN AND BROAD LA\D COMPANY, AND MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPNE):T CORPORATION, IN RELATION TO THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN THE ERTENSION )F BANYAN AVENUE AND THE PROPOSED POOTN LLL FREEWAY ON THE NORTR AND SOUTH, AND BETWEEN THE ERTENSION OF ROCHESTER AND MILLIREN AVENUEE ON THE EAST AND WEST - APN 735-141 -08, 12-19, 225-151-01 THROOGR 03, 07, O8, 10-13 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PUN 205 AMENDMENT 84-02 - MAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - Amendmenc of Per[ III of the Induetr iel Area Specific Plan co set abl ish a Haven Avenue Overlay Disf rict, located on both ei des of Haven Avenue be tveen Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street. ORDINANCE N0. 249 (first reading) 2^_0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIA, APPROVING INDU STRIAE AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84-02 AMENDING PART III OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH A MVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT LOCATED ON eOTii SIDES OP EAVEN AVENGE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVAED AND 4TA STREET City Caun cil Agenda -9- Fehr ua ry 6, 1985 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ~}^_ 84-04A - HAVEN AVENGE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A General Plan Amendment from Office to Induatr ial Park for approximately 40 ecrea of land located oa the ve at side of Haven Avenue, be cveen Foo [b ill Blvd. and Arrov A ighvay, in conjunction vith [he Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208-J31-61, 12, 13 and ZO B-241 -01. RESOLUTION N0. 85-35 _..- A RESOLUTTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-04A - HAVEN APENDE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A1ffiNDTNC THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE HAP FROM CFFICE PROFES SIONA:. TO INDll STRIAE PARR FOR APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES OE LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OP RAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW HIGHWAY - APN 2D 8-331-01, 12, 13 AND 208-741-01 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84-04 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A Development Die[r ic[ Amendment Erom OP (Office /Pr of easionall to ISP (Industrial Specific Plan} for approximately 40 acres of land located on the ve s[ side of Haven Avenue, in conjunction with the Haven • Avenue Overlay Dia[r ict - APN 208-731-01, 12, 13 and 208-741 -01, ORDINANCE N0. 250 (first tending) `~8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DI S'ritICT AMENDMENT 84-04 - HAVEN APENllE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM OP TO ISP ANO MH FOR APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE PEST SIDE OF RAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW HIGHWAY -APN 20 B-331-01, 12. 17 AND 208-341-01 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 - RAVEN AVENGE OVERLAY DISTRICT - An amendment [o the Induatr ial Specific Plan to expand the bounds ry of Subarea 1 (Industrial Perk ca[ego ry) to include approximately 40 acr ee of land located on [he vest side of Haven Av¢aue, be [veen Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Aighway, in conjunction vi[h the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208-331-OI, l2, 13 end 208-314-OI. City Council Agenda -10- Februarq 6, 1985 ORDINANCE N0. 251 (f fret rending) ~Sq AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMORGA, CALIFOBNU, APPROVIAG INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAA ANEIiDNENT 84-01 - RAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - ERYANOING TAE BOUNDARY OF SUBAREA 7 (INDtlSTAIAL PARR CATEGORY) TO INCLtlDE APPAOEIHATELY 40 ACRES DP LAND LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF RAVEN AVENGE, BETNEEN FOOTRILL BODLEVAAD AND AKRON NIGeAAY - APN 208-331-01, I2, 13 AND 208-314-01 5. RO1-ADVERTISED PUBLIC RE~tIeOS No items submitted. 6. CITS MAYGEL'S SLFF tEPOttS A. BARRED ROUBING FOR SENIORS PROGRAH - Cova ids rativ¢ of a ~50 propoeel bq Ial and Hedia[io¢ Board [o participate in e shared housing program far senior citizens, B, ALTA LOMA CHANNEL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. R4-2 - 254 Covaideration of Re solar iove and Engineer's ftepart to in it iace pzo<eedinga for [he Alta Loma Cha¢¢el District and authorize construct ion and bond bide. Sit the public hearing Eor Dietr ict formation on March 20, 1985. REBOLllT20N N0, 85-36 V67 A RESOLUTION OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HARING FINDINGS ON PETITION RESOLUTION H0, 85-37 258 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIPORNU, DESIGNATING PERSONS TD PERFORM VARIOUS DUTIES FOR SPECIAL ASSEBSMENT PROCEEDINGS RESOLUTION NO, 85-38 2i0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 171E CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONCA, CALIFOANU, ADOPTING A MAP SAONING TAE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OP A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ~~ City Council Agenda -11- February fi, 1985 RESOLUTION N0. 85-39 271 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY _ OP RANCEO COCAMONGA, GLIPORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER TH6 CONSTRUCTION OP CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS, TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES, IN A PROPOSED ASSES EMENT DISTRICT PDRSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1917"; DECLARING THE WORR TO BE OF MORE TEAK LDCAL OR ORDINANCE BENEPIT; DESCRIBING THE DTETRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES TREREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS RESOLUTION N0. 85-40 `r6 A RESOLUTION OP TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CllCANONGA, GLIPORNIA, PASSING ON TEE "REPORT" OP THE ENGINEER, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING A TINE AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC NEARING RESOLUTION N0. 85-41 279 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TAE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA, GLIFORNLA, REFERENCING PREVAILING WAGE SGLE AND DIRECTING CALL FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS RESOLUTION N0. 85-42 ^-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI IY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS TO FINANCE INPROVEI(ENTS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIE TRICT C. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS FOfl T$E FORMATION OF THE RANCHO :S3 CUCANONGA PARR AND RECREATION FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - Resolutions directing ataEf and Seam members to proceed with the fotna[ion of a Park end Recreation Improvement District. RESOLUTION N0. 85-43 285 A RESOLUTION OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF ItANCRO CUCANONGA, GLIFORNG, ADOPTING A PLAT SBOWING THE AREA AND PROPERTY TO BE AS SES BED IN A PROY05ED ASSES SMENT DISTRICT City Council Allende -12- February 6, 1985 RESOLUTION NO. 85-44 :N5 A BESOLDTION OF THE CITY COONCIL OP THE CITY _ OF RANCHO COCANONOA, CALIPOBHIA, INITIATING PROCERDINGS AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OP AN ENGZEEER'S 'REPORT" FOR CERTAIN ASSESSNENT DISTRICT PROCEEDINGS D, REQUEST FOR SPECIAL MEETING TO REYIEN DAY CREER --- FACILITIES. o ~ ~ ~ ~7 CODNCIL EOHI16S8 Na ireme aubmii ted. R. AD]ODR<ffiRS I Y• 1 L I a I 1 K 1 [ I a 1 I 1 I I R 1 ~ 1 K 1 ¢ 1 3 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I i I 1 I Z 1 U I 1 W I O I i I W ; 1 w 1 Y 1 < I y~ J O P J rv O O N 0 0 0 P J P N O F J O 0 0 W? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`¢\ 0 0 0`r W U U O j.~•I[\.p000rOOJ•OOLL\U'O NPOOOW-+Ip0000U01[\r OOmrNOJO nIJ`I[\~DmNJJj.Vm!•IP~+rUWmOrvrNYVi J',.)J NIL\ONJ:J J~.p nl aDr ryN NP.-• PL UGI ~`~rWju]OPWI[\.-•OWN.+.Or G•+jOOmO .-INUN.-•n rH '• Pr Nh-1 r1N~j N r• P O•'• Vj `~ W u• a .. v .~N mV'Q\.pF9P J•+NmjLL]WrmV`O •'~Nm j.t\•OrWJ`O tiNm j1[\Lr DlTO YjjYJ'jjYY ~.~\.n 1\-•V\n\•(\.n .L\L•O .O wI ~(!•OW J.O .(rNFrrNrrrFW NNNNNNNryN:V IVNNry NIVN^INNNN(VNNNryNNNNNNN NNNIVN U O O J O U w .+ O J J O O J O J J U U O J J^ O J U O J O U O J O O U O O U J 'J JI \n v\ JI ./1 J\ N N ./\ N v1 w W w W u 1 i 1 L W ~ W W W J H H ti H H ~-• •-• M n1 H W ss as z s z z ¢¢ z ww w > S S S 2 S L 2 2 S S S O r•- r~F r r r r rr r J J J J J = G J O '~ J Y Y O W' W W W G L I W I J \.) W W O J w~~zl L ~u .- v, ~ L LL W LL 2 LL V w a< " 1 _ w U J L L L .+u i s L LL s 1- 4 Y~ J L w\n .J }J UI-y VIU ZOVJ t•'J W(_1W V•U' m Jrl.~ zmlc\..p WLL\W wml~lm Jy y'ONN V\ L 1'ZNN fl)Z VNNN VNN LNNN ZUJdJOZ rY\nL J•-1Yj r+V'i-• /r u~Yp .-+m ZlnYmjj •-1J Sw2~- ~-•ZQ UmrO K J yY•F> ww< JSLN J`ZUlZulnJwyJfrLw'J V\L wV\r• JNNWyZSV\U Itiy V•NN •-. y NO~+L "1~ /'.ly 1-•1-n.•wmul .u (Y 1-V\LL 4NNC)W~-•W Vi h+J Nvn .n J }}YV`•9 JJaC- ¢LL wIC }<W L QHw f< Z« O¢ /\ JJy y'Q Q < A N Y J r. •- ~ J r n s ~ s G .n ~ L J LL U J J LL 1 6 Q J J J V•N V\p NVNW M1J~/1Q~-iuS W~JYZ VO r+llUO~ ~J/1pFUUJ ~+ N S w ~[ .1] U N (] Z a w J N LL W LI N V1 V LL LL W R W W I~ J W Q p y p J O V V w (J ~] N O p O 1 J¢ J W ~ O O O Z-+x•31 C Z JU'-' L V LL JulM wf L L•-1F ZZ w2 ZZ•-•U 1Y2 Z~2L ZZ nwwn ~-•Y.•~J.-cur-aGl->.n J\L 2: JO~nWJO>sr~Jry Lr-»J :7i S ZJO~wJ.uLLwZ w.L]2r-.LL JU 2~uwJ2W W V.2W JwJQLwW W .ONUi Q •-IT rD n >a zJ 3-+J1-Frw 2 ¢4 LL(CZ 011L~Y1n>U'1 mL•-1LL'YY 2 U Z Y• w Z c ~1 Z O J 2 N N w Y C n i ~~ m Q Z O Z U O w LL U N > w2 r+~ UL W C J N ~• 2 Vf lS O VI > F W a O 2 U yr O J S: Z K ¢ a t9 r Yw <r 2 4 1~ V UYt W WV < L L W6' N Y.n L W Y 2wN U J U Y Z W 2 i 1n 0 1 < ~+ Z U w Q 2 O 2 J>y1Y QF Q1n .J LI- Np: J C Li W V N V Z {L ILLL >1.)2 2/1 V Jy' YiL V N•- 1 U Z y 3Z.-1-NY VI a yJF .L wJ'Qw r<JK Urn Y L WO p~-1Uw<ZY N \nN +Z W YFN62 J J i Zy 0•-1Y W W 3 -Z J R1-2 2 t V ~ S N U T Y -• ¢ w'J w X W L N S O¢ w a Q W LLSS -~ LJY~-I Z LLLLrLL2 Z ~<J -;] OZ\n< ~+L~ FO W4L JW UZ 20911 ~- - «.~. J •^ W W 1~ 2 D F Y 1 -Z Z n In L U W - Y• w W O W J< -2 U 6 O 1' 1-• i- Q U Z L w H 4 J a -U W 4 4 Y 4 W W U J Q L 2 U •-~ LL< -1 O -S 1/J~-+`+ I-JGJ OJVIV JNJUI"' J x-14 -Z •"1 lJN<LLLW 2lJ '11Y .L 1IlWJJmO J[]IJ aIL 01"'1M J<1YN • UJy'OJ pZ OU -fLL f •001-l r+0«KKZZ x2 -iao<wrWZy'YJSZJ<O W WW•'•<.. •+¢JQOrZLJf-mW WO'+U l)T.21NL]y'If.N<WJJIII«Y< 1 I 1 •9'.DVVF'1JJf.Z=$y1LQ1/11/INN4«KWWW•"1M Q.000 t a<< t 4< a< 4 a a Q J<< (< <<< t t< t<< m m O ~Im m ID m m LL b m m NUUV..mFNPrvmul if NPPp•mU^rv m1[\jO W1[1P•q]tl f0 .(m•-1qu V~m 1-•~+•~+ y m•+WnmNN.+FONJNO~N O`l'N •~1 N~1r P1 M1 g11{1fj•OY •0P j 1 N j.T j3\ W .+1j `/'mNJ• j(" m' • timm 1{Iw NN W n 2 O V J U O u a Q Z K Q S 7 r J m N 1 1 OOO.-IO OI~OUOJOONUONOOOmYOYOOO P~O NI~JOYOP.•IOp Yr~ •I G~'G NOY.yI{\OOOOn1wUOrutO•+N~UOOYI[)WLL\yOUO.+m ~1[~Itt lh •O Jl f 1 11 .pPWJ~OmI'11~61J NIT mLLtNtil'-~p•-I ~u 11'1 (O WI•IPYPI•I W.U LL\P •'•NYYry J.j Q 1 (1 LL\ N Y I(\ N .•1 N •-r (•t •-~ f•1 1(\ N .-1 1•f •-r rv U .O N P p• Y T 1~ •-1 •• Y ..~ O• Y W ry •O W J • 1 .-• PI{I 1~ IV N ~ N IV (.1 .• IT I'I N IV Y Y .y Y ~•) 'I r~ ~ 1 - - - Y 1 L N Y .y Q 1 2 1 1 1 1 K 1 .-IN^IY 2~~nCCtTO•"INmYLL\.QI..mPO•y N~IYW.QI-mP O.~V NI•f Ylc\,p 1~yPU•y 21 y~WtQW~pmaDYPPPP.p•PPPITP000OGUOOUJ•~1w w.v .+«•..w •+•'INN d 1 NNNrVNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN(•1m r~~-)1.11.1^1 r1 Tt•1~'11•f 1~l f~l t•1 !'1 ~~11.1 !'I r1TT al S 1 OGUJOOVOO:J,JOS.:.JUO...OOiJuUOV000JOOJOUJJOO.J U:] 1 1 1 N N/1N VI /1 /1 NN IAN N N I L L L L i L L L L L S L F I ww ww 1 ~- -•-F` F~H~ fH 1 ry w •'1 ti r• 1-1 r• r••1 1-~ 1Y H •-~ •-~ ~-• ~+ I N ~ L R 22S YYR' d'tL (Y 2K KlL LL S ~ V L S V S 2 2 2 S S L S L 2 2 S S 1 N W L) N W p p O W W tJ W t: W Li W G G W W O W W 1 L 2 2 ZL 2 1 JDIA D /1 U ~~ J ~ 1 L L W S LL w 1 1 ~-'• H W W U W U N N w$ W 1 f .A F- H .A Y y I.y Y L ~ J Y Y 1 J 'L •"~ Lu J J L w U J J J VI U O j v /1 Q u d V W •-~ .ti n N J .~ t•1 w W d' d W L d T N W W N 1 N1... N1L Yrv N~`~O N/INw N L N UwL GNNVIN <V1 J1 I n1YU. Y YYY+t InT 2 -r L ZN L •'IYY •-Y /1 J1T QL Z m W Z ¢ 1 Qu <a o ww S 1-> LQ W JI NZ n11.n ,,, /1 .ni LNJUJ JL •SInZY,-1 .1 n+W V1VJUWJJ LL /1 1 J~ /1 .. J1 ~n IY H O V1 rr ti Q VI r•4 W Q J L JI d •'1 QS' L <RS 6"¢Q 4 y ZQ JJZ JQ j S«/1L 26~'+<KJJYdJV L L 1 JG W J:.IOJ LLU W V L Q.'>JL OIYZ JU W D Z W UHL .. rl-U J.)U wL¢.. /~N r1 N IYU 1'-tLrDUU LL.n /IWNNQN~/1 1 1 U Y N V U ~A S Y 2' /1 N /1 w VI W L tY W U ,y U J1 < /1 N d' ~1 Z W I U OC MU OD Ot ]V ~YU ¢^O w W/IUUJa QD W <W J L OO W w V W u 1- 1 Z~W Z~y L ~ LL W dNZ L L'y <ZV_L Z V d• i3'1- Z L ZZ UL Jrll<U1~1-O~JDJL V.^Jr-• .y,~-rr ~.u l-LYJ 7~-••-~2r-1 ~-1' L LL y N /1 LL LL r ~, r 4 W J W N l,] J N S .J J` y S L U N ~-• d LL LL /~ N W W /1 r j j ^ 1 W Z j'~uwL~ W w Ww UJ>w W JDS•+G W W r- u Z QO wUU WLL G•I OrJ 1 O_'~-+U 'LL'Y~ STLL]:.DWOSSyLLL 1,aj2J`y>JI]"•LUR:L OmGJa01Q6 U ¢ J I -+ J N 1 LL W 1 ~~ G ~ U H Z 1 p Y < 1 tY 2 O Z 6 p J .A L 6 J ~ r U 1 Z U ¢ W OY i Z 6 2 N_ 2 < V~] L O J L l Y 1 P V a < V N H < O O Z Z 7 ~- ~ L -O (L L J ^1 W< 1 N V W O LL U U Z 'U N j U f \ Q K U' r r d > N ULL /1 u1J2 W Z w¢ U Ur W ZUZL I J ~J O IY W IA H L j F'1 J d' W W L lJ ~- M W h+ O d' .-J l'JG JtJ U' W /1 Jt JW d/IU J 1^L «HtU 1 CLQ L LSLZp r'+Q -OS Hl6 WLLZWr 12OL U Lw Z< ~-IZ OLY <QU ~ S WtJ> ~ZZ L1H 1-I lY J W m¢ ZwJw-~L S'i r-~Y OdO L OUI-Z¢d V O<WU W 06'd 2<1- 1 HL JAL NL]<J 2 YJ1Y W ;J (J i) ~Y2L V1¢ Z Jm•'1L y W W wV W JFnW JOr 'u L'Y 1 S<J }Wti«J<WC]JJ W< L1Y< LW /1LLF OLJS WO¢J SJUJ -GNWWY-•W Z~Y r-~SOr J 21-< } Z<w Q N«IYJDd 1 $(Y d Jt JC] S OU W L Z J1LL L J -LL rLLC]U Z -i W U' V' I-1¢ U W UCI)w wK NV'U.D W<LLOWOLWHw'J M.wW >~YSZLL S-!rt 1 Yom- -~YiQ SOIJr{L UIJ VI J_1- JJN rrW OO 1 Z>wwJ ~<wOYww6LLOn•IUU d•/I IA I1- DOJO W1-r2IZm ~YT D OYi]1- YY YYI-ruJ 1-~j r0 >JrrY QI/ILLdO V1YrLLQ 3 <t JJJ 1 <LUUJILQ ~tC•Ai-'~UJJJ2QZWMd'rUJyZiW2dK<wOUVW,=MM 1 lL Q D J 7 D D D J J J~ 4< l w 2 W 2 2 2 n 0 0 0 0 0< p 0 OIY ¢¢ D D < f< mN¢).vm mrD mID W:DOVUVUUVYUVUJUVV000 VVUUUUVOOWO ul Y 1 ¢1 PTW Wf'1•'IN WU OYNmJ.pY ¢IPNNPNYrI~PI(101[1 •O I~WYIttF M.. V dl A-WPTYUII[\m.-IWr[\JW mIt1 •uUPO1U r•1-1-ID ~O m++l~$ PYP.r a)WOp~ 1 I(\ ~1 M1 u\ W~ V N .-1 Y Y N P T ./ Y W Al In irl '1 Y Y P T I •r m000rOU-IrJOOrvu~01-~nrOOUOOmuOl-ml-OwuNPUOV'O OmO OJOmu\ry1POW00•-Id vm d•-I lt\OPOO^OOVJw O.-IYPrvUONOOdO I- I • • £1 POtO.-IW NU\YPI[\NrvWPm P,t\J•NOwrNI-yNI-WdJWVIm WnI~rN.u dl[\ <1 1.1'.1- `U •'IY .+^.y NI[\JYmmOw^PP.y .r •-I •+W^P ~I[\NN O•'ImNv 1 I[\ m m LL\ C I[1 O N L = W LL\ N R 1 _ 'Y I d N r W W J m < 1 ~ 1 1 I 1 ;I NmYLL\dFmPO•~NmYU\drWPO•-I Nin YU\dr,y\PO^Nm Y~(\JI~tOPy^N R'1 NNNNNNNNmmmmmmmmmmYYYYYVYYJYU\~(\I[11(11[I I[rW LL\1[I I{\.J .py KI mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmr mmmmmm 3 1 O D U J O O U O O J O J O J U O J U O O y U 0 U J U 0 y J O J O O J J U O O J O O I I I Vl m 1 £ £ Z I ~ W 1 ^ ^ 1 FI I LL Q K I W 1 _ ~ J Z 1 ~ I o W o0 o upo n a ooow u o 1 z L 1 J J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ J ~ -J ~ H 1 LL LL LL u. r. LL LL J N LL L I 'n ,u w W LL LL W W m I 1' wC YIL ll-^ LLY U Y L~USSL Y1 1 OJU w yJ0 LW y .ar 4•-I JOwOJ 1 wNNr-i ..r WWy~nm W"u _uW (L W Y.L 1>J-uW W.yrm U`JN I V1NN>J1U In VIYNNN££NNNO.'W V1 OGOLLNNUI y1 VN<ryNV1Y I W m Y L L rv L Z V Y Y W Y Y w L Z< N R w m N £1J Z L Z m m„ Y m W 0 KI ww> ww ¢a.+wWO .+ wrn ww .w+ JI U4nNNJY:d~J /r JINU1:j JV~<J¢UJI u1N UJ„p.J N~/11-NNU1 JII "INN Wti HVr vI^ J.N QQLLNL w~nN SI]^I'w LL 1n VI JI VI {n^ W 1 J Q< Y J VIA J J<<< J S 1 LL J J $ W J O H<< $ J J J~ LL ¢< W<¢ J w O 1 J J U (J . J J J O O J N O L < J J •- I J O J J J J Y I NVUWJIH WN/1U JUN^r-JIN VI VI^ ,/)1-(;J U.)>lYN /I VIW ^UUV1UUvl £I N $NU NN NUU NNwVI W/I< <wNVIN ~l[\ vl NG W O O U W f W W w 0 J U W~] w W w l- N J W U 1Y G~ w w W W W W W O O W O O WIJ r i Z ZZ LKUZ Z L.' ~ Z fY .L '.~z L wUyI-I~-.IZ2 Z2LZ2 uU•-•2 z~y2 ZLI-I JUZ^~-r-IN1-•J.`LLIn~^.. ~-I.-TOLL.-. J4yLL O.r I-I I-IILLLLUUJ^ ^I NLLLL<JIZ LLN NIi /1 vILLNIn<O S~nW1 £.JW V11nLLLLJ' OLLLLN^I 1 ~ w w J J O LL~ Jiu J ... J L L w J J O LL w 7 J w y y w Z J J J LL LL w w w K w u O J i tO tY tY t1WUU3]aI IYYCy W-+-+.~.uaxa iSll ~L Y•Y JUi931 ,y OJP¢d'.11L 'S•:11-• I 2 ~~ J I LL 1 ~ In 1 J vI 1 J IJ U L ~ LL Y Z y O ~ ~- 2 r '^ • s ~ o u u r i z w 0 z U n. In n u a .+ o ~ I '~ ~ w z u r > z I~ \n a o a I u1G U :] U u O< < vlw KU r H I M w O ~£ LL< y'UI-I<ZUO UW • 1 2 S«2¢W rIn tLU Jn.IW <LLI-+1 LwWVn+r-ILSw < LY F- <YOI-+U J3 YU~J •-LO£SJKOZUUS^OU LLJXW2<NW W p.'SL U¢U YU -~ VIn I••I y,OU<U' ZwN ^r+N W^OJOWKU= J 1 ZOw< - y\IG <J•+IC Y.u l2 Z W J~ W L I £./1LL /IL KJ J.y (LYI•a I J<W OHO W I[ JL > W <L^IJJ W OwIL ILLL-Ir wrl •-I<Nwn•w «rLl>U4 1 W JWU' /IUZ YOJ< tDJ 4 V 4 £UVI C.< ¢J C W 1-V Z LOS I Q Ll .1. (L £ w C •]: I'• U I-I < IL _ - S LL < W 2 - I . •Ny\pwwr' LL^YJL~'1MUWLL'O JVJrN 1-J OYJJ •N>J -WY N <U(C 4LWLLG< ZLC7w <N«<LW N< I wln In r..IN<1 VIwJ < .£21-Hp'•Qf(YWI-III-I .y J/\I-11-r3K1Y J2f N21LK I ^w~'IW YYI- ZZ Yrlw fY Z~<V UI-Iwjw V SLY 4wV(Lwww Jl-It WC I L» .L V U V L 2 ~( < W Y 0 4 V1 ; W W d 1- M L] 2 J J J Z L W' 1L Y• L Z J U W O W w> I «tW'I I•IM OOUIY2V SY<OJJ£ZI-WWMI~•I<O«t¢W WI"IOS Q.J W W I OUOpO00000U0UUUwwWWWWwLLLLLLLLj00I:J {p 1'J U•~J U'OU•I:J {.'J2m W 1 Y I l1 1[\m•Olt\..•PPNrrtvmd Wl-mdPYN.^1-•-IV ~.I IrIN SOW yfp l•~~pmPViWNW d 1 d.OdOw^O^dN.~Yd`r vNJdWI[\1(IWPrvr.lu-1 I[\d~~/y l{\m.-IO m•OrwP I Wm ^IwN^PW mNyl [\.[\u\YWrfYwm:y fll it\1-W HIV IH •y •+I`N Ls1 3 _ __ J u i 0 Z O i u 0 LL U S N .1 r 1 ZI Q 1 •I al ~ 1 31 I 1 Y 1 ~ 1 LL ~ a 31 I i 1 I I 1 1 W 0 H W ~Y I Y 1 aI al moUwpoom:.,ooro~ol-Y Omr JNO•+ooo JO..ooooJ000ao 4~u~ •-•Om w000.-•JUOVpmOmr rPrv JN-rP00 +00•-•M OOOJOOI[~m Y.. mwL04•NWIn N4~4\4••pPUrJ1410PrJWr4~O..~ryNPwmYN9r Nmm ryry P .y m .-• -+ r w .+ .O 1- N M1 m O LL) U• m m N Vt W .-~ .~• .-• m .~ 4) .+ .-• N •-• P -f .y m m .+ m.. m.o by .+vN .. m~m .. t mY4:JlrmJ•O.+Nm-rY)Lr.DPU•VNmV'W.pr•OPIJ~NmY41 .Or mPO~iVm w.u.•1.OJ.I.pnrrl-rrr tir rmmw m4immmmwPPPPPPPPPPO OOG mmmmmmmmmlNmmmmmmn mmmmmmmmm~nmmmmmmmmm~vvv titi .. ...~.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .-•.. r.y ^..I .~.rn .. .. V O J O O J J O J U O O O O U O ~ p U J V J O J U O J ~ J O V O O U J O O O O G O n ~ W L W r '- r4 W V W W --1 h N w VI N O.L W 7 W Z S i Ow O w w .L Z S U :L U V Z J r •-~ LL r LL n _] J J J O p Ow p 4 •v]Op~nYOpW 00 /t /t U p LVI L Z 2'L In y2 Zen L'L N W O D 7 7 L D~ W i p U Z >> J LL IL } LL L w LL LL W Z L w w i L .. j w w V ~ J •-. E Y r .Y .L t•1 :7 •L 2 I.y ~- .L S ./1 V• '2 r QY2 J LJtL JY. JL Z OJJJ UOO JOOU '2 w2 ~w wm(.] YW J2W wW 111.1 Y.9 nl •lim nl (Om1L NOVLV1N Vli NLL V1 V1 L~~Ni i NVI •n Nry ryNNNryry •nNZ Z~-•YYL •CZ Y •f L ZLL ^'•L ZNY Y LL W •!•mLL m V'J' mmJ O~JL> W r 6 w W Q W O w Q J Q W W 0 0 O h $ H W¢ UryNUUV1U+nL JU •J JLOQS ~JV Np Z~nNNVfN/1 n.•_IJ4 ^6/1 ^V••"'1 ~w~-+ ~- •-•r'•L V~N~uJ1N•n VINNOIH JZ QSJ¢v(L SS JJZ jJ JN'SZZ JJOS 26 ¢Zi t<4Q«Q.LLJ3 O J U J L t J U W (J J J W W J J J J J J< O NUUHVIV Inr Jan VI JIl V)J1mrlCr /~Nr SiUV LNVJUVUV Zen V•r N Uu~ V•~+ 21-uI V1Y L•nN U U•-VIN6V•Y Y•'+ a. Nl w00:]wOw-1 .]O Jww¢Qwwp OS JJ'u •uU2 ¢00<'-000000 L Z L~/_ ZY .: W <L ZLL YL L 2~ W [[ a> Lr•iwdZ Z4•YZZ Z ZZL u ^OLL~"r-•J^+~~3:r LJNHJ~ YS.'+'••J6l ILOJ~IC •YJ JO J~JO 1- /ILL N~+•LLV r-•2v N~.~JN NLLV1a VILL .. V•,yi wWLLW>LLLL LLLLWLLZLLVIV O w w L JiJ 5 2 w n J J> J J J w L D L N j J 7 J >~y w> O w w w w W w t LL J S W YLL'•'~ L•Y 11 .+•C ry.t .JyU L3! m.1 •-'V ~Q J, 9f1 ]. UY SI.] QKK IL. 1'N'Q NONE H 2 Z N < n 1 t U LL W v V ~- O U v 1 Z L .J /r Z V h-.+U Y z w ~-• ~nL ULLi:r J ~ 1-. 1-1 > Y W N L 4 OUY ~-UrY•-• w V O Q ~"~ J• VI f •y ~< J U r U Z ~. J O V .7 wS rUm t2J~-'1p yIH•. h Oww ~] f 1 U ~-Y V J 1LY6 V N K V 4 1 U iJ VI S 4 4 lL W R' J w Il V V N LL W •-~ VI (1 (1 U.Y r1 NV J•'+:[ .u0 rO.J i-•v1 W•"IJ JM C:LJ Z 2•••lu 2 ~-'~.]j QhuJJ UJU VO (YK N<U'L<<•CLVwmZ t•"• aLG[ J 2 ~V Y ti J J LL CI •] J iL +i t W J •-~ 2 2 L n ~•~• •-• ti t t S p Z Q IL UJ U W Y W O~'~.~¢ i.n L /IW LLJU lJLL V pUV-7>2 JVI •nO<>~2 ¢t /+Y S ~n•-•/I f W tLL W•-. r.w W•-•~W 22 Y0 027 fYLLYOLY -t _aZ aLL Q,Y U-•< .~-+OI-rrJ 4VILt UFO l •L 'J•pr-• LS Q<wZZW> U FYI ZNtJ •• t DVS. 6YQr U:L I.1 `-'l.`,~ wr UUGZ UOZI .7 .ILj .•y. - YJCJ ~•-iJLw~yU S u D1~Z U V•ZZ:LK ZNNW H Nw ).YOW C JJUV JJJ wLLJJLw Z Q 3 00<tWW YYLL•VI<2 wd •J YQ. JJLLJJJ>J.JJJL}(IL61Ort L•90 JJHr WUV R.mY j'ZdyJO2 JP f QQQ.y wr-I.-IOO pODt[]]Y SmS2222Z <tWODOOtfW MJC SmZ1 SSS ZS2 SSSL SS ZNNr•MM~-II-1'IMl>9~1~y0YYSJ]LYi rmV'Y•'+m.u.Y.+4•InPm UPrrrNmN UOtOm M~1~1NT~pq PwrPl~ f ~V wv~~1.1Pm+~•n.-I .••wwr mw wr~„w.IVU.-I CJNP~Pm rPP LL\4~PP~m NN N `fNNtiN 4 y .~. , W (7 ¢ O Z J U 0 S u 2 ¢ 1 ~YONJOOmJrODUOOUQ+OrtTOOrHPONODD000ilomoul[~ru • 1 I[~1-I aD ap OV•D U~UFOUJDDVOD^W DI[~Y mll~Dr00 UInD0JV~Il~0UY m1n 1 L I IhNPWWF NIt~IT 1.IUUNOWUm1{~1pNN~WInmONJJLL~mNV•.L 1~WNI[1PJ•~ <1 P^OP ~OtiP rmmHm..luw^mu\~. ^1n Or-ma~OmNYWmHrPN•p Y :v • 1 •O .p F N NY m.-1 S1(~ YLL~ NN m NmNm Q 1 ¢ 1 N Y .y N <1 m 31 1 1 1 iWdNw OHNmrln .p l~tD ITOHNmr~•p l~ilPUnNmYw R 1 .pl-~O TO^NmY ¢ 1 DOOOD ••1 •"1 ^^•-'1^^HHNNNryNNNNryN m;lmmmmmmmmYY'Y rY ¢ 1 `F Y Y Y r r Y r 'Y Y r Y Y Y r r Y Y Y r r Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y v Y r Y Y r Y Y r Y Y r < 1 N H .• ^ .-1 n .y .-1 H ^ ^ ^ ^ .r .+ ^ H H .+ ^ ^ '1 .-1 H ^ .-r .-1 ^ .-1 .... ^ ..r .-1 .-I .-1 .-~ .-~ ^ 3 1 O J O O U O J J V O O D U U U ~+ U 0 0 .~ O D J U D O J O J O J O O V U U U U O O J 1 1 1 N N N N N N N 1 s r L s s s i 1 w w 1 r ~ H r r I H N H r+ M '-+ H I 1 W W_ ¢_ W_ W W W_ 1 S Z 1 ~ H I D O 7 0 O J U y 1 U W OO OV 2 W W t_10 1.f DAIU~ I Z Z L Z r L 2 Z 1 > O J ~ J 2 Z N < J ~ D I LL LL U u w W LL 1 W lY W •u W Q ( U N :Yl J W 1 m _ L J JUr-J V OH O>JJ•~•IZ mV 1nZ ^ I .aaQ +INNm•.•m mY WWN¢I-~N w~1mWW 2W 1 NNJ VINrNryryNV VI 1n Nl7 V1JJNW~NLL~VIDJVINUNJN 1 W Z Z L Y m m r O m Z < r Y.u U U m N S m O'n Z N m ~'^ Y W N Z< Z ¢ 1 M W O w Q LL H w Y W W W ~< J w1"'W UI JUZ NUU11 J1 V1 VIw N1 ~YZU GVINJS=NGNN LI"")NV1 •L1D•"'V ZV VII X1"1<WZ NF4H /1U VIUWH 1JI VILL WWND 'nO HNNW LtiWH wl pJ VO <JJYi4< Qt£J ~'«d?><^•y 4•"12 J66N ¢CIU J¢J OI ^ 1/ILH J ~JJJLLJQ.u JJJ J~JJI~D JJ O1"1 >.n~ rUV/11n VIV UwJ Qr+~IJU1-1-S 1n Stn LI 1n<L< V11n 1r U1-•N/IZ LLLL ~L Jr V1 UUNf NwV1 yl WWI"'1 u•U UWWJJOCUV•ir W1L<U^wLLLLD¢UDJUWOO<^¢$wtiW F- I V Z K r^ 2 2 2 3! Z. Z Z Z Y 2 H L T L U H H 2 r Z 4< Z Z Z¢¢ w w Z J 2 w2JN Or+H.- JJJ^JLwHQHV.uH¢S ~1n2J~LL~-1J,1-1-m 0•^41.1 ^1 LLNrr+9WLL VI VINLLLLLL nJVIZ 4LLLLi .yLLZ6LL V1L ulLLLLZVIL7VIL V1 1 LL J « J e w -J 7 Z w w g J J w J .u w .a S 2 w U J w Z O~ w WJ Z w l~ ^^ 7 U.LZl"1L1¢mu]-+YSY•YS'JaYl2UYY.J 1n .n 1L V.1¢HJmS2UHCV11p UJ1 I I 1 2 1 U I H U N I \ N Y 1.•1 1 N Q Q ¢ ~ 1 Y W Q W 1 U IY 2 ~¢ V NaJ I ~ O O< N Z w Vf V Z ~- 1•• W M O !- I D U ~ i 4I Z w w ~ ~ r 2 ~ I F DU < J ~O L. P1 e'1 J• V O W 1 U 1 ~ 2¢ U?~ 6 U ZH u. 1 W 1I1 1"I ^ H w N 1- Q ./1 Ji 2 W w W N Z W S F° U' LL U J I L U g J Y V 1 < L T Y V 1 4/ 1 W q• Y HDUZF• YZ 1-12 HLS.L 1/•ZLHZOJH NQ4 ¢~ W V Z 1~¢1'•]HJ«H SZ U ]L 1~•'^W WOD>^S^S/I w:~1-1 WJ' ¢1I1 < 1 rN¢raJ~-1mY2YZLY¢ ZV OC'+H ..¢ S4J22U N4Um 1nJr 2UJJL J J J2iJ (J Q sr•y 2.u }: '-•LZ 7•y LL.2 J1-1wJ .nW W J J I <7UV1 •-1 W<^J iJJ2Lw (Y <~HNJJ >Z WMN(LQ 'JJ¢N U 1 p U L 2 LL 1- J J< ~ -1 J td LL J^ r J ~ L 4 ~ H L~ m J I 1 U 2 W UuDN V6J1Uf] ,2 ~ W L¢i ytNNN WS+/L w U JJJ J r.n V GIU •Z SJ wIL U UwwD a 4t<W S 1 L `n <ww U•n ~LL 1YL uL W < •LZ LZ 2NJL tL Y~/1 Q= L Z 2U I OJOUO^ ~~¢wQ<UUNLI<=JV141-+^1•+1-IM 44U<WHQ MOOUn•1 1 F• S¢~t,$41u DC1 ,vUHWH U• MS~•1'*hhS]LL <'L Y~r JMI..IM W 1 NLLUr-1SQD7jU' YLZ>W 1"VI f.~UU¢SSS¢¢~ '1V LKrHJ1..rFM^ 1 ~ g4<Wwww^^00<UUU~ Qq4««<VVMMGiUOVI I-1«<m1..1 W I y JJJ J.J J J J J J J J U J J J J L S L Z L L L= L I S`C ~= T r. .L Z T• Y Z Z Z W I i i ,oaomm nl-o•moauol-..YOrr minvrDOalao w•o Al-NO.+U a~nGo 21 ti`oOP^POd^rO PaUN r.yU1`OmyuO. 1[11n OY-Nm~wFYNWP.-IO mall yYl[•r1P 11mr Y~tl 'V HNi(~N~+1N.D Ip HN mNNNIh ••I ~O~ NN1[1~WJ`N1D r I NONOwJOO.JJmwYOWUrLL~O P•+00`rOP.-11[•N OI[~OWJUYJOrNV .1 mUPYNJU~OUOWPti~GNrOrO.-•P OUWmYrNYOWmPUJPOYmu\JM1 1 W SI mu~.{10.Odmu\w wJPmm.+W.p NNPrULJU~N.-I U~r U~nmrJru~J ru~mW ql mY O~-.p m.-•rYtiW UYrP.+J•-I I(~NN^ImYNP U4'YYU Pu~N~O .pN • I •-• •-1 n N In .-I H m V m N .y H m P .Y H U Q 1 q Y I H •-• N a a Q 1 N (~ ry I N I U I Z R1 W.pr mJ`O~+N.nYI(•.jlr maJ^I VmYWyrwPO•+NmYU~,pr mTO -•NmYm ZSY I S Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y J' Y 'f Y Y Y Y Y Y v Y Y Y v Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m Y Y Y~ < < 1 .-1 n .v ti .-• .~• ti .-..-1 .-• .+..• n .. H .-I .-I ..• .-• .• ...y ti ...-~ .• .y .-• .-• .r .. n ~• n .-I U 3 I G U U U J O:J :J J O O O D U U J J U J U U U J U J U J O U J O O J U J J V O O :J J J I U 1 1 N J1 VI N N N t/1 N O I i £ £ L i i i i 2 I w w w w w w J rr1-r 6 1 u• ¢ 1 2 Q 1' G 26 Z Q1'¢K L 1 WW www 1 L 1 2 J US 'J ZSSS J 1 , .7 LJwJ ~.J J Cl "JJ^ J w 1 W W O W UO U WLL.~iI mWOVI W''-.IWW •n OU 1 L L L V. L N N L IL 1 O w2 W 70 Z•-w Ow L ~< I LL Y ~-• "-1 L Z L LL 2 I .Y ~ •- i t1 Y Y 1- i S .n VI LL' ~n O ¢ JI'- 2 U 1 JZX O JJ1 VIZ wDUJ J JYJ• V• .u u].•. ^IJ .uLLL 11ND w0 JN .Owww£ I NNj,LL Y iV IVN NVI JIU J. UJ N VI GN Z SUNH U I ZY Y J Y Yln wL G^• V11-IJ wLLY (y 2LL HN LL)M2F K 1 w ar•~ r- -+ww>[t w>.+J .> OHwO Ziw £ O<>wR > U1 WILL ISN/1 n2 JJJLwr-IKS N ~J w£M YW II ItVWV11 VI I ~-•N 'Uw 2•n 11 •'• wrJ rJ1r UHF-ZrOJ qUr WH>w y I Jq.L n-I>Oq ~<4 O.JJN wfLN>ZZg2wJZOgULL LL22~NJOHVI JI J:]J HJ JJ1 J LLL wwJW .u ~-•i LL qW0 J I VIU ~- NUJ l) 'n/1v ,~•-V1i iU i~YN£r UG Vl>LI'~1-NN1~ y i N UJ.~q ~w/• N+IU wJlU1YY YWVIYQG 2•n VIpYUUN~ wOJJ11 UU L: :J J•y uwwq.'l gLL4gU 41-•wgUw•'• Vlw q<GCw ~- I L.Z 1f ^~"~2 2LUw~~~tY qH:L^111172p.^r Z.7r1 2R'ILZ H~1-1-.i J>V•~.~.-' ~~Gr-SLLJ:~4 HYJL 21-CU L.L~~•-•S ^I N•Y JI VIW.pLLWLLLL1JLL /I ~nLN^Lw WLVI w.J^gQHOVIJ ZVIw12 I J'.uLL2~wJwww•"•~JJOU<OS»wJ~.1J»YJZ LL'tL<>tOJl<G I mY'--~~-'I ~n1Q02.L>uJ~I.LUIYUV•~JJIJJU]O11aLL1LLU,HJ9VILU < J I Q Q I IL IL V N I J LL L Z I-. Y G1 w W U N ^• LL LL J (Z L 1 U 6 1 f- • « U W w 4L S LL Z U Z Z U_UW VI V u O 2LLLL O HL } r Z N V HOOL »N In •-~ J LL rn N~ 1- f IL K Z r Z Y W J r 1•I W W1 Z V W W W •~ L I I.J I) Z J Vl Krr WHO J<N NI.JOO q m W VI 2 Y U^rq f KGJ> 1-•1 J. UZ UVV IL I qYN ,I IY F' q•- >•Lr IZ > 1 JUHMY•r NZLLr W20m LL V •n s_ >'w ~lO OU~^NVI (Y<J wZ'+ 4L q'Y ~+"^Oww Vl rt<Z'tUUO < H <U""12wOKLJ YwwE 0 >q ~' •O ~L p"1 WH1~ JU ~Z O WHM2 2L i ILw£~-•.-NUW <~-+ N~IO£O~C J JrNNO JOO[a 0(l1HH~-• I u+ p YGI'wL 2J Y~< VIL Z.u riU4 JZ LL Z Ll9UNS •yHUpO LL I '•-SJ6WU .n-~VIUQO SJJO JJwq •-•~r Y¢ N ~S Y'O: IYK G I /I GNU 7'L15 •n .w •-• J qJ :J 4LLr Uwl"I Lh •~U' ~r W W W W •"IN NrFf <t NL...W ~ GLL q Yw ].LN UIL TIH .JL 1J f tiw22 KiUUfY2 WVI V122 Z WC:I1 J)1 Z Y r <KG rOSJJU <HH J~ tL J: It N r V• J w R ~ W •!] L L C LL "/I i I l Y L 1 J V ~ •L 9 IY •L w V V 1 yI H N V Y} W W w 1 N> JNUq£UOOu1}wWW 1Y VIgGNQq<U tY¢IY2Hr1-mmm J I i LL H Z • w ~( <£ N H~ H J lY Z Z O J •• O LL H O M W W M N W W w H LL W W 1 lL fl-W U Z2'N VIN'-Hr J(L O1~ ~JLIW W £ £LL HJNN2f»mmOLLLLG Z 2 1{I 1 U JL 2• f q«< q« Q W 1"• M Q M • q< t W W W W t H M M O O O g f< f q w w I LGJ01wLL4LLLLALLLL{1yLLLL1mCtL tL O: •[. a'Q1£RLL~QCG2¢tYNNNNVI 1 w 1 W } 1 41 PP WIt~,Om JIYNPrJrw.+WNWm.~•W Ww •O InOHmm N•O n1WY•ON m•+•~v I LL 1 1[I~IPm.-1.'•m NUIYYJTIWrLLIr N•01f~•~•P X1.1 (/IFmPNr'1F M'rmm'I ~p~ N 1 Y i•NYaNY .-IYYY.LYYNfr NPm YN•f V'mm •'INmNYmr•f I I ~voYOO~o-.uo0001-orvLL\IT •ONJaI-a)YV O.V UIO-.o NJ0000 J0~ .I NO~O WPHJ OO•~•Od UNr`~•-I .+I~N•Om LL\nY Vr•O ap 1nUJ00000Y0Y h 1 N £ 1 mmN.JYOti•-ly'UWRIO ~O WI`P LL1mFLL\HP NyNUn11~ULL\V\UUJyLL\O LL\1"Y ¢ I P.• 11\•+OYHnr u1N NPLL1 I~OmH P.U I~YU•PI{\ P.-1NU\O UHYN P • w I J N N H =ti m m Itl m m N •-1 u-N m O r- •-1 (~ K 1 Q 'Y 1 Irl N O H •-1 N LL\ p Q 1 F I < 1 u I Z R 1 ~O I~WPU•+NmY11,pF yaO•+NTYLL\.QFyPl.1 •'~NI•IY y\,p F.yf U•+NmYLLrW L O'. 1 YYYJY YYYYYYYYY ~~u\\I[II{\LL\~OOOH•~•~H~H.-~H.+~~Y NNNNrvN I[1 1{1 1[1 LL\ LL\ 1[1 1[1 I[\ 111 LLI LL• ~(\ ~ LL\ LL\ 1(\ LL\ I[• 'll ¢ ¢ I ..H .. .y ,. .. .•... V ; 1 O U O O U O U O J .> O J 0 0 0 ..IJ U J G O U J O U J U U O U J J V J J J O O J O J J 1 U I 1 :il N VI Vf .il N H VI VI N /1 N N O I i £ f 1' £ L£ i i l i i£ £ L 1 W w W w w ..1 W W J 1 ~- ~ r 1- r F• r r '• O Z I •-• H •y •n •-• r+ H H .~• .•• •-• ti M M H W Z < 1 JI J U tt I S ~ Q d (Y V,' d Y Y .Y ,Y Q OC Q d 2 u .L I W W_ W W_ _ _ _ W_ W W_ W _ W_ W 1 1 S [ [ S V w O F- ~" 1•• r h H W Y I W W O W U W O W W W W W W W W W W W W w 0 Z p p L 2 L N V G Z Z 1 ) ~ J d r ~ ~ I N ~ ) 1 Z 7 Z LL LL I W J W /1 [Y Y YNrW ¢ WW 1 Y 2'rd d' Q d L.A £ U .YY I J Zd v JU YH{S Vf U2wJ1HUO N d w p r ~ ry u J w W LL J h L U ~• 1 w LL m N W' u 1 Wd V1~VIL NNryNN ZZVILJ N U Q•'• Hd'Un•NNNV1 I r~ L Y$ Y m Y Y Z LL 2 H O J Z H L LL r- ~ H h m Y Z Z W K 1 <•n w<1-- w Q>ZOLI-1 JI••Ir>~-d'K OJm» wwr~ U I V` JIJNUil YN nNU U Hl lJ JAY r- • QJL LL'SWW .DSS <NVIV UZJ yl l pal-VIHNM H•/1 '+y] 1 LJUli9<SI•^ ^dl-•w we~Sl~ uV1 VfN1-•x-16 W 1 J Z Q J Q J d' Q Q~ Q J S s 0 'u 2 1 H U U /1 Z d< N£< Z LL w N m d< J J t d O 1 "'I J J U L J H$ '-• < S. I H N W J L u L O W h Y J J L J 1 d'QUV1U /IH UJUNI-¢r YJ VIVZJI /I IYN rVl wLZ HwV JNV1 £ I US /IUW VIWJQ Qw£•YJ Y4 wUNp Jy02 U2 VINWN • 1 yI UwL]W:J JI]•,)I.].u UUJI IY<NhT YWJ¢r WJQ Uu QHpUW WJ r. ~ W ti jN~r2-1r.U.l ~ ~~ jZS~H Qw 4w J wUU W Kr^wd HIYJSL 2L V V 1 VI ~•L NLL NVIYu vHiVf'1J1111W=+I ,L¢m[L OLLSZ•u2Uw~^rw JJI••I n•IHH > H L L VILL LL N N$ LL 1 /IJw Jw)L WwwWJpw ~vYY(J Y._.•IY Uy WGOW Q>'~J OQWWOJ WLL 1 ¢ wCG 1p ~( W•+}lL (Y K.S1 p,LL p, W 'I n1 .1)m naJU-'» U6 W UUUI-J.OSS'(pL>O 1 1 I G 1 Y U Z 1 U L [] I 2 J L O .7 U G 6 _ I I-I U UJ UUJ VY 2 L n W U > L L 2 r L Z .J 1" £ h 11 1 O d O O p 0 0 0 V Z w 2 h 1 U J ~/I VIN /1 VI VI W .J W O /~ L 1••I vI L < S Q I L O p U U O O< 2 J z 6 LL Y O d w w w W w w 0 O V •[ O Y 1 h 0 ¢ N ¢ J L J V V H Z Y O M• U ¢ ¢4«Q4 O wnp h 1 Jm t U 1Y < N >pd' z 1 o w~u < O ZL ZZ222 Z LL 2 2 w0r- < 1 UY 1YUU d 2 dd12RS Sd U O O O OS tL I tL •-• Z1-1 ¢ JOC.IJGGU 6 M O •'•GW 4L C Q Y S 1Y {L [•j J LL LL 1l LL LL LL 1 lY I-' w r^ 2 Y< S VI O JWU¢'-1 iL ^JJJ ¢¢«<¢¢ NrG U [Y <1-.nn Y2O 1 (Y LLJ~ JSGN•Y 1L UUUU UUV ^N VIU ZNI^1- ZIUZ<~J JHy O 4 0 ^W w7 Y Vlu4 <HSL ~ JN •]LL <Q•OQ:NS 1 LL W HHw Vt ¢ JLLyl ~J041J Z Z ZL Z 2L JhW Y r-OZ Y YS ¢O V O Wd ^U HQI2LLILSYW;YWwGV1QLL UO Su7 330 1 .(JJ J41 /Ii :. .u W W W U W G JU• > J1"•LL UI~hOVI Y W 1 (Y ID Um JJ WJZ ^~NN W S Z 22 = $S p Y Hw1-1N[~ 1-IV < V1Nh J ~ ¢wHnd W3Z 3'+1 QI-1-r-1-1-•1-1-tar->J W2YpI,~WILOJ2ZZ 1 Z 2 Z r Y M ]: >¢ Q a w Q Q J J » D ~j O J Q<¢ w J W 6< V M M JlL O J I<< W m w l NVIV VINmVINNV1N NU1w OO G00000d d!^-OS71 «•d•W w000KIL2 I W 1 mtt1NNVIN VI VI VINNV1Ny1Nti NNY•mml••r-h1•l••h•1^y. ~G Y 1 <I JN1-YU~PLL1•D U1Nmm y,p..rl-Ff^I~I~I~P NN OID 1m PPMIPPhPP YY1r~'1111 - 1 4 1 NI'•N u\P1r1NPu1 u1•.m NP~1 •-1 '1 •-1 •+••1 •+m N111YF1`~N AI /Vt•.1YP11131 .O YI•• 1v I P•+m ~;•I U1 u1 .-1 mmP PWmmml•1mmm1111.Im \r1NYP•-1rImPY yJT I u a< u x U U Y Z ~. 3 O Jt m a IV I 1 OO JPOI-000.)UOUmOOm JOP.-IOaP OO1~OmOPLL~Om 0000 m • 1 NP UNO mr O00 J00 PU1UPm01~1`~ONOU10 au1P000 Om 0000 r 1- SI • • . • • . • • . • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • . • . 01[4J:70 Lm~I~NNO mmm m aOmm Olt)amlft N -•~ f~ <1 ~ . Ip rUN wNNN rNUM1NF N.-1'11.1 Um01(4 N1f1-'1 •y .rmmammvnrvr-.. .r .. - ~ d to .I ([ 1 ^. N I Nm rvm rv N .. m..ar rv - r S 1 f I .y m m • z I 1 ~ I I ¢ 1 1-mPO~+rvmrul,ol-mPW.+Nm r!~al-apaO-+N mr,~.o r-aPO-•Nmr 21 NNNmm mml'lmmmmmvvrvrvrr vrl(41[11(11(11{lmm1n u11n a.paaa :l 1 I[1 IP LL1 LL1 1[1 LL1 m m W LL1 LL1 M •R H I[11[1 I(1 1[11[11[1 1t1 LL11[1 LL1 S LL1 W LL1 LL1 LLl LL1 S4 in 1[1 m It1 IL4 ~ ~~~~~ 3 1 I O O J J O O J O J J O O G J O O O U O O U U:J O J O D U O O J J J O J O O J 1 1 T .n vl .n N N an N N y 1 L Y u U 1 w w w w w W 1 I~ M r ~ ~ ~ 1"1 j 1 I W M W M M 1..1 e.l w U 1 n 1' 2 Z R ~ Z Q R 2 2 tY J I I W w w w w W w w Z S W w ti • S S J i = s F 1 _ ~ n 1- ~- m .. ~ ~ . . 1 - I - u I '~ ) O J J O J U O J J I Z 1- 1 W :-) vlw Y W WOr••nOW WOW W W 1 '/1 > ) L V1 Z Z 1 u wo > >rw> > 1 Z z U .1 ry L li u ~/1 n Q 1 1-• 1- W L 1-• W J In I ~ .n y .L S/11L Y YJFf 0 1 quoJ op onw o0 a u z ~a I n w~.)..m rvv ~..WU w w J»I. , 1 JI F N m N N Z r U Z N N JI N N Q R' Y W •-• N N ry 1 T r r f•1 W rl r ti f JI Z I^ LL Z y Z w w} fY U T Y r ~ 1 •-' OS >~1 WW1-IO W~O•".W NN ZN NNy1N W1 f LL r¢¢<f 22 ¢v1¢OZp J62 JW6 LLJZ ZICM< ¢«< J 1 J J W JJ JJJW pJ fLL ^I .J •~•1"1OL ~L JJJJ 1 U N LUJ ~UUL VI-rH>ONpLVINY NV1R Qf.V 1-1/1UUJV L I N W N Yr UL ¢pV11/1 }V11"IN NWWUq y w' zpt>W ¢}Op~lp p<Lpf <u< .Ip<wH¢ww„IW OY W. .ppup H pz ¢ U .rW Zz rz zau zs L 1-1 Hz z11 Z'L WUZZ Z~ uJZ2Z z ti l mom.-....1¢J»_.»IC..~r..JL Z..~¢...um•-.., .. ..~}..n» • 1 mLL J1uwLLJ i. 11LLW W1G¢mV1 i"•V1LLy N>LLL111JU'V1a J'y LLLLLLLL I ry lJ u J w< w y w w w> ([ w U J U< f O W J J p w LL O Z 2 Z O J .~ w W w W 1 I I IY16.J,)y'>ly'!CtL YvYOa.YVJLLUL'.L .YJ aI<L:]b..I w..~ULL~n .c 1L 2'IL 1 1 I 1 1 U 1 I y I I .. } 1 N F' ~ H ~ 1 y= U 2 LLt 1 r O M U 211 w O U U I VI 1- U IJ r ¢ U p ~¢ S 1/1 > W 1 Li In J J .V rY.n ~U w ~ 1 1 Z < r Z w < H W V< Z W •+ I (Y M1- Z r2 N WO WW ZI.'1 )(> LN OI/1>r} 1 „ ~ w W LL' } W IY Z w H M ~) LL' i..l f « W ~W N~ (l( SOJW lLL (L I-U •-JWWU'U'J 1 <rH JZ O > m Y V1 1 y O W l< 1 ll X LL W L f < f ./1 W W< IL I 1 ) VI./1 IJ fY J <Ofr SJ2U } W<$ Rln LL1F< 1 J Wf >q -W ~^J,L ~-ILLf/_LL' WL lLr NS f OUJ I } L y W~ $ yt>U llW ~Lw O ^WOS FM LNZ }LLan < - I S• 1- 1'^ G S W M i q p.' S^ O.' -1,) 1Y (> L J U N U i..J K J O'. V I U Z Z L M Q J SON.+¢ULF-LLJ71-}LL1L 1111 qY £q In ./1m ClOMI-1¢ h l <fY _ 9 U Y1 .y wIC w¢¢ .L uwYOZ JLL 1 3Up0 LN 1 LL J`S [yr~ -([IL 'L <(>.nJ SCK LO UIC J y2 wIL IL 16O 1 M r 1"1 J 1.~ w S w W w w 2 Z W W W W H U W O} X Z L W W W J I l •> JJ Uppp.-11-IYO J¢NI-IN r~gZJJV1p OO LILO 1 w J' n r+ 1.. J J Z Z 2 G Z F Z (L Z 4L K V I X m V N V 1 N LL' J J J Z R Y W LLZ > ~ r r»» ") w I ~"JJ »»»3W 33S3~3332G3323 X>NNNNN }. t 1 ~NU'~a1~1^al~.+vOa Nr-U mPm mml-ul al(11[11nOm-~1PO.+IV •G LL11t1 d I ..mv Nr-LL11c1PU1Nrv.-IOP~-IOI~mm.~IV P..Pt O`O JIPWr Cth~V'.r p. LLlmr rm4lr 1'l m m rvr yN..r my rvrmr mm Pl•1PrNa 1F 1.1T NNN • V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ucwM STAFF REPORT ~~ y T • I1 LJ ' ~ I~~ DATE: February 6, 1985 - ig;; TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack lam, AICP, Community Development Director gy; Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: ADOPTION DF CRITERIA FOR LENDING AGENCIES FOR THE 1985 RESIDEN MDRTGRGE REVENUE BOND PROGRAM BACKGROUND: In expectation of a 1965 Mortgage Bond allocation from the State, Staff, with authorization from the participating developers, is preparing the necessary application for private lending agencies who wish to participate in the 1985 Band Program. It is necessary, pursuant to Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code, for the City Council to establish minimum eligibility requirements which lending institutions must meet in order to participate. The attached Resolution is similar to the two previous bond issue resolutions in that it identifies the three necessary criteria which a lender must satisfy to participate in the expected 1985 Band Program. Briefly, these criteria are as follows: 1. The lender has had significant past and present experience in funding mortgages financed by revenue bonds or has serviced conventional loans far the participating developers; 2. The lender shall be a Federal National Mortgage Association or a Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation approved seller/servicer and an approved Federal Housing Administration mortgagee; and 3. The lender must confine its servicing fee to the lowest possible rate, but, in any event, the fee Cannot be greater than the formula established by the Bond Counsel. A list of local lending institutions, as well as those which have expressed an interest, is being prepared. Upon adoption of the Resolution establishing the participation criteria, applications will be mailed to these lending agencies and the qualified lender(s) will be chosen. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ~ Adoption of Criteria far Lending Agencies for ~ 1985 Residential Mortgage Revenue Bond Program February 6, 1985 Page 2 r 1 LJ RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution establishing the minimum criteria for the lending agencies for the 1985 Single Family Residential Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. ~ectf lyT'submitted, i Jack Lam, AICP Community Development Director JL:LD:ns Attachment: Resolution • • /G% RESOLUTION NO. ~'z-S-r=R C"5- (~ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 7HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPAT (ON BY LENDERS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOME MORTGAGE FINANCING PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") has undertaken a home mortgage financing program (the "Program") pursuant to Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (the "Act") for persons and families within the income limits established by the Act, and proposes to issue a new series of revenue bonds pursuant to the Act to provide additional funds for the Program; and, 'WHEREAS, the Act requires that home mortgages financed with the proceeds of such revenue ponds shall be originated and serviced 6y lending institutions (the "Lenders") approved by the City for participation in the Program; and, WHEREAS, Section 52020(b) of the Act further requires the City to establish criteria for participation by Lenders on an equitable basis; and WHEREAS, the City, with the afd of its staff, has selected the • follow inq described criteria for participation by Lenders in the Program, which criteria the City hereby determines to be an equitable basis for such participation. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED, as follows: 1. A lender shall be eligible to participate in the Program of the City if Lender meets the following requirements: (a) The Lender shall have originated and shall be now servfc ing a significant number of mortgages financed by revenue bonds issued by the State of California or by counties, redevelopment agencies, or other Cities within the State or shall otherwise be qualified by reason of having originated and serviced conventional loans for Program huilders; and (b) The Lender shall be a Federal National Mortgage Association or a Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation approved seller/servicer and an approved Federal Housing Administration mortgagee; and Resolution No. P-2-6-1-R Page 2 (c) The Lender must agree to originate and service home mortgages at the lowest cost which is in • the best interests of the mortgagor, which shall, in any event, be a fee of not mare than one-half of one percent (1/2 of 1%) of the initial principal amount of the applicable home mortgage and an annual fee to service home mortgages of not more than one-fifth of one percent (7./5 of 1%) of the declining principal balance of the applicable home mortgage. 2. The City Clerk shall cause a notice of the City's intent to select one or more lenders to participate in the Program, and of such criteria, to be published once in The Daily Report. 3. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that it intends to select one or more lending institutions (the "Lender") to originate and service Home Mortgages to be purchased with the proceeds of its new series of Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds to be issued to provide additional funds for the City's Home Mortgage Financing Program (the "Program"). The City has established the following criteria for selection of Lenders for its Program: (a) The Lender shall have originated and shall be now • servicing a significant number of mortgages financed by revenue bonds issued by the State of Ca if iornia or by counties, redevelopment agencies or other cities within the State or shall otherwise be qualified 6y reason of having originated and serviced conventional loans for Program builders; and (b) the Lender shall be a Federal National Mortgage Association or a Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corportion approved seller/servicer and an approved Federal Housing Administration mortgagee; and (c) The Lender shall agree to originate and service home mortgages at the lowest cost which is in the best interests of the mortgagor, which shall, in any event, be • a fee of not more than one-half of one percent (1/2 of 1%) of the initial principal amount of the applicable home mortgzge and an annual fee to service home mortgages of not more than one-fifth of one percent (1/5 of 1%) of the declining principal balance of the applicable home mortgage. • /~ Resolution No. P-2-6-1-R Page 3 Further information, together with appropriate application forms, may 6e obtained by interested senders from City Hall, Planning Division, P. 0. Box 907, 9320 Base line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, City Clerk 4. The City Clerk shall also cause a copy of such notice to be mailed tq all lenders who she believes transacts business within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PA55E0, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of Fehru ary, 1985, AYES: NOES; ABSENT: don D. Mi a s, Mayor • ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk 1~ IJ u CITY OF RANCHO CliCA\SO~GA STAFF REPORT GATE: February 6, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8, Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Richard Cota, Assistant Civil Engineer oi~tiroN ~'F Cy ~', j s I~ty~~Y ~ ... !z 19" ~ SUBJECT: Award of Contract far Design Services of Arch ihald gvenue Sidewalk Improvements between Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard to C G Engineering and authorize execution of the agreement in the amount of 59,340.00 plus lOX for contingencies from the TDA Rrticle 3 funds allocated Attached are copies of C G Engineering's Agreement for Consultant Services as a bid proposal submittal for the above sub,j ect design services. The Engineering Staff has analyzed the bid and finds it correct and acceptable. The proposed services will include a field survey of the orooos ed prc ject, right-of-way research to delineate existing right-of_wav limits and one "redline" plan at 1"=20' showing alignment concept for sidewalk placement, right-of-way acquisition, landscaping, trees and street lighting improvements required. Subsequent to an Engineering and Planning Staff review and determination of a general landscape theme to be implemented, C G Engineering will then submit a second proposal far the Final Oesign Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates to be prepared, The proposed project encompasses the pedestrian route along both sides of Archibald Avenue which serves two purposes: a safe route for children to walk to Central Elementary School and/or a safe route to walk to the neighborhood shopping centers. The proposed project lies in a ma,j or arterial street which carries high volumes of both vehicular and pedestrian traffic, This street is fronted by many older est ahlished single-family dwellings as well as multiple-dwell inq units and recently developed commercial centers. Presently, pedestrian traffic at some locations is forced to walk across lawns or in the streets. This street, Rrch ibald Avenue, is also one of the City's primary north-south water carrying roads during the rainy season. The design services will be financed from Transporation Development (TDA) Article 3, Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities funds allocated by SANBAG for FY 84/85 in the amount of 862,000 for design and construction. ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF Award of Contract Archibald Avenue February 6, 1985 Page 2 RECOM7ENDATION REPORT for Design Services for Sidewalk Improvements It is recommended that City Coucil award the contract for design services of Rrchibald Avenue Sidewalk Improvements to C G Enq ineerinp and authorize execution of the attached "Rgreement for Consultant Services" at the contract amount of 59,340.00 plus 10% for contingent ies from the TOA Article 3 funds atloc ated. Re~pec tfu llyrsubmi Cted, / LBN:q~,tjaa Attachments • • • 1~ J ,ict • AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 198 ,between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and C G Engineering hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City desires to prepare designs, ccnstruction plans, specifications and cost estimates for Sidewalk and Street Beautification for Archibald Avenue from Foothill to Base Line hereinafter referred to as "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has the necessary skills and qualifications and licences required by law to perform the services required under this • Agreement in connection with said Project; and WHEREAS, the City desires to retain the Consultant for services hereinafter described in connection with said Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council at a regular meeting held on the day of 19R ,authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties that: I. DEFINITIONS. As used in this Agreement, the following definitions shall be applicable: a. Consultant. Consultant shall mean C G Engineering a California Corporation located at San Bernardino, California b. City. City shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation, located at 9320 Base Lfne Road, suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. -1 ENGINEERING COPY J!~ c. City Council. City Council shall mean the City Council of • the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d. Services.- Services shall mean the services to be performed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. e. Satisfactory. Satisfactory shall mean satisfactory to the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform for, and furnish to, the City the services described in Exhibit A, "Scope of Services" attached hereto. 3. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. The Consulant agrees that it shall delingently and responsibly pursue the performance of the services required of it by this Agreement and that said services shall be completed within 20 working days after execution of this Agreement in accordance with the Project • Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B. If a delay beyond the control of the Consultant is encountered, a time extension may be mutually agreed upon in writing by the City and the Consultant. The Consultant shall present documentation satisfactory to the Cfty to substantiate any request for a time extension. 4. PAYMENT. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, upon satisfactory completion of the services described in the "SCOPE OF SERVICES", (Exhibit A) the Consultant shall be compensated based upon the actual time spent on the Project at the Consultant's standard hourly rates attached hereto as Exhibit C, Dlus outside services, but shall not exceed a total amount of S 9340.00 • -2- ~7 • In the event of authorization, in writing, 6y the City of changes from the work as indicated in Exhibit A or for other written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated herein, additional compensation shall be allowed for such extra work based upon the Consultant's standard hourly rates (See Exhibit C). The Consultant shall submit invoices which specify the area where work was completed and the associated time for completion to the City for approval. The Consultant agrees to invoice the City for services rendered not more often than once a month. Work performed at the request of the City, outside the limit specified in this Agreement, is to be designated as "Extra Work" on monthly invoices. Work performed in connection with an authorized written change order will be so designated on said invoice. • 5. CITY SUPPORT. The City shall provide the following items of support to the Consultant: a, Provide a staff engineer to work with the Consultant for the purpose of giving advice and to provide coordination within the scope of this Agreement. b. Make available and provide all existing data and information relevant to the proposed Protect. c. Provide all right-of-way negotf ations. d, Provide environmental processing. e. Provide plans and spec ificattons for kidding. f. Prepare and mail final utility notice. 6. SUSPENSION, 7ERM[NATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The Cfty may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portfon hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least fifteen (15) days prior to -3- I~ written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately. cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days of service of said notice, the City shall pay to the Consultant all earned and unpaid fees and casts based upon the rates attached hereto as Exhibit C, plus outside services, but the sum so paid shall not exceed a dollar figure which bears the same proportionate relationship to S ga4n.On as the quantity of work completed by the consultant bears to 100X of the work prescribed herein. If the City suspends, terminates or abandons ~a portion of this Agreement such suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. 7. BREACH OF CONTRACT. if the Consultant defaults in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall have ten (lo) days after service upon it of written notice of such default in which. to cure the default by rendering a sati 5factory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Rgreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. • _4_ ~~ • 9. INDEPENDENT CDNTRRLTDR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. 10. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Cans ultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, its officers and • employees shall not be liabie at law or in equity occasioned by failure of Che Consultant to comply with this section. 11, ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any moneys due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. 12. INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain general liability and workers compensation insurance coverage effective on the first day of work and in full force throughout the full term of this Agreement. The policy or policies shall be underwrf tten by insurers admitted to operate in the State of California, on forms no less broad 5n the scope of coverage than standard forms. Entire iimits of liability maintained must be certified but in no event shall limits 6e less than specified hereinbelow. Any aggregate limitation of liability shall be separate as to the risks arising out of the subject matter of this proposal. -5- ~%G Coverage Minimum Lim Workers' Compensation & Employer's Liability E100,000.00 Comprehensive General Liability/Comprehensive E500,000.00 Auto Liability Combined single limit each occurance If reaues ted, the Consultant agrees to deposit with the City, certificates of insurance to satisfy the City that insurance requirements of this Agreement have been complied with, and to keep such insurance in effect and the certificates therefore on deposit with the City during the entire term of this Agreement. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto and supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. • In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Darties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSULTANT on i e s, ayor Date: ATTEST: Bever y A. Aut a et, ity er C G ENG//.I~~NEERING By: A/V'~ i'~/~.9~ Title: PROJECT ENGINEER Date: (- // $s APPROVEO,~AS TO FORM• -6- Date: JAN 3 0198°,~ • J~ EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. Perform field surveys within the limits of the ultimate right-of-way to the curb line on each side of the street and prepare base topography sheets at 20 scale from Lhe field surveys. 2. Conduct right-of-way research to allow for the plotting of the existing right-of-way limits on the topography d rawi nos. 3. Prepare "one" redline alignment concept for sidewalk placement showing the areas to 6e landscaped, needed right-of-way dedications and missing street lights and trees. This is to be performed with staff coordination; a general landscape theme shall he provided by the City. 4. A Scope of Work proposal for Phase II Design and Plan Preparation for sidewalk and landscape improvements to be 6a sed on the staff review and acceptance of the redline alignment and design concepts. • NDTE: The field survey and the Copogra phy plotting will be completed in such a manner so they will serve as base plans for the final construction dra~aings. \J ~~ PROJECT SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B The following schedule will be followed for the performance of the items included in the Scope of Services: 1. Field Surveys 2. Right-of-Way Research 3. Oesi gn Concept 4. Staff Coordination 5. Right-of-Way 5 working days 2 ,~ ~~ 8 ~~ ~~ 9 ~~ ~~ 2 ~~ ~~ TOTAL 20 Working Days • ~3 C G ENGINEERING Planning and Engineering • EXHIBIT C PREVAIL IHG HOOBL2 BAtBS July 1, 1984 -June 30, 1985 OFPZCE Principal Engineer 580.00/Hr. Project Manager 60.00/H Z. Project Engineez 55.00/Hr. Landscape Architect 55.00/H r. Real Property Specialist 55.00/Hr. Principal Planner 54.00/H r. Senioc Designer 46.00/Hr. Designer-Draftsman 42.00/H C. Planner 36.00/Hr. Senior Draftsman 34.00/H r. Draftsman 30.00/Hr. Computer Operator 30.00/A r. Engineer Aide 30.00/Hr. • Administrative Assistant 30.00/H r. Clerical 18.00/HZ. PIHLD Resident Engineer (Professional) 60.00/Hr. Inspector (Unlicensed) 42.00/H Z. Pi eld Survey Supecv isor (Licensed) 52.00/Hr. 2 Man Survey Party 108.00/H r. 3 Man Survey Party 138.00/Hr. Electronic Measuring Device 70.00/Day MISCBLLAHHODS SSHVIC8.5 AHD BEPEBSES Mileage 0.225/Mi. Prints, Copying, Reproduction and Miscellaneous Materials Cost + 108 Outside Consul tanL Services Cost + 108 Equipment Rental Per Cal trans Publications OGFY85 2827 S. WATEAMAN AVE., SUITE E • SAN BERNAADINO, CALIFORNIA 92408.17141 824.2420 ~~ nrmv nc o nn+rvn ri+r nT,rnvr n • STAFF REPORT DAT'c: February 6, 1965 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Mubb s, City Engineer BY: Joe E. Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer 7 z z .. isr- SUBJECT: Approval of Bonds, Agreement and final Map of Tract 12091 located on the east side of Grove Avenue at 8th Street submitted 6y Rancho Verde Development The attached bonds, agreement and final map of Tract 12091 are submitted for City Council approval. The project is a development of 248 condominiums on 11.35 acres located on the east side of Grove Avenue at 8th Street. The subdivision was tentatively approved by the Planning Commission on January 12, 1983. The bond amounts submitted are as follows: • Tract 12091 Faithful Performance 5102,000.00 Labor & Material RECOHENDATI ON 851,000.00 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract No. 12091, accepting the bonds and agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same on behalf of the City. • ~tf ully su bm' ed, L .J :kr Attachments f v"V ` ^'C 9 C' `(, I! cirr aP ru~cuo cvcnacaen ~~_ cin a uruuo ~ t--r U L 'yIYE ';ate. ~ ~ t 3 I ~~ V '~ i cirv ac onrnz;o V IGIN ITY MAP .4`~~~~IO> CITY OC RANCFIO CCCA,~10\GA ~~ ~ \n ~!. ?: Y %r}.~ rJM14 1 c. (W-~ 'o ENGINEERING DIVISION ~~ ~ > VICINITY MAP Ian 9l- N ~~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ / ~I~ 1 ~r~I ~ I ~ 11' !i \)~a- -~ai+~M~r wn~ `L ~ \ ~~~ i 111-y si ~ ~ ]' ~ ~I~ ~- ~ ! ,i -~ :~: .,~ . _~~'i ~ r I I ~ I I S~ I J^.,I ~ ~ i1 i sYi ~ - r ~ ,! ~ ~ ' ~l i i i ;--~ 1 f ~~ ~ ~„ Ii i I =~ ` II---------- ~ Y . ~ JC' / ~ 4 \ / n ~ IrI r ~~ , 7 Cj ~ .:... ~, ---s~,=~- -- ~,~' r~ CHAFfEY J61NT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT °° °'i''°°~ ; O ]I1 WE Si iViN Si n[F' 0\'., °IO Cc CiFCF Pa 9^F] December 13, 1984 Letter of Certification of School District Capacity Within the Chaffey Joint Union Hfgh School District attendance boundaries for the following described project: Location/Description: Number of Dwellings: Tract No. 12091 NE corner of 8th 8 Grove Rancho Cucamonga, CA 248 multi units Anticipated Completion Date: Summer 1985 The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 37 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State or California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall validate such commitment. cc: Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga S~~ervir,terdertt/Asst. superintendent by Dianne Atl~n_„~j (,g~,~,l,~~~` `~. Steve Wheatley RA~'1C H0 VERDE 9333 baseline Road, Suite 1~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA ~t yk' J R OBC RLO V[1A50VEI Suoe ~R+en~ Cucamonga School District 8776 ArChib old Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Calilormn 91730.4698 Telephone p1496i~69d1 December 13, 1984 Date LETTER OF CERTIFICATION FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY 60,up V~ T9 ~5,[[[ .~...,. ... ~... n: s.. a.:. a ~cA a.. ~•.~ ~.. _._. n... c~. Within Cucamonga School District and Cucamonga School District attendance boundaries for the following described project: Location/Description NEC 8th and Grove Tract x12097 Number of Dwelling Units 248 Multiple Dwelling Units • Anticipated Completion Date Gentlemen: The Cucamonga School District hereby certifies that the capacity for 76 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy F. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocations Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90 day period shall validate syGtrXamni tment. S1y,11~ /' NVy}}1~/ Roberto Velasqueh \/J`\V\ Superintendent 1111 ~ _. cc: Planning Df vision, City of Rancho Cucamonga RV:fv ~y CITY OF 0.AXCH0 CU CAMO NGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR tract No. 12091 KH OU All MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and enteretl into, in conformance with the provisions of the Su baivi Sion Mep Act of the State pf Cali Porni a, and of the applicable Ordinances o/ the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Lal if prnia, a municipal corporatfon, by and between said City, hereinafter re/erred to as the City, and Lee-Jay Development Co..inc, hereina tEr r2f EYretl to aT [he eveloper. WITNES SETH: THAT, WHE0.EAS, said Developer desires tp develop certain real Droperty in said City as shown on the condicsonally approved subdivf Sion known as Tract Na. 12091; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by Said OevetoDer as prerequisite to approval of Said subdivision 9en erally located at the northe asC corner of Eighth Street and Groye Avenue. NOU, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by Said Developer as foilowf: 1. The Geveloper hereby agrees to construct at • Oevelover's expense all improvements described on Page fi here- of within twelve months from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the r¢splutipn of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the tlay follow- ing the firs[ anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Geveloper may request an extension Of time to Complete the terms hereof. Such request shalt be submitted to the City in writing not less than 30 de ys before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a star em en: of circumstances nece ss itatiny the ezt erasion of time. The City shall have the right t0 review the provisions of this agreement, including the C onStrnCLI00 St dOd arils, CpiC e5 tuna[!, and imDrOVement SeCnri ty, and tp require ad.i ui cments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 4. If [he Oevel oper fails or ne 9lects to eom ply wl th the provisions pt this agreement, the City shall have the right eL aer tir,.e tc cause said Fr evicinns to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Oev elpper and/ar his surety the full cost and expense incurred. 5. The Geveloper shah pr ovlde metered water service to each lot of said development in accordance with the re gu lots on s, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Hater District. 6. The Oevel oper shall be responsible for replacement, relpcation, or removal of any component of any irri gaLi on water system in cant ltct with construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the L{ty Engineer and [he owner of such Mater system. -1- ~~ ~ ~~ ]. Improvements required [c be con strutted shall conform to the St antlard Drawings and Standard Spec~f icetiens Of the City, and to the Improvement P'. an approved by and an file in the olf ice of the City Engineer. Saitl im provemen is are tabulated On the Cansfructi pn an0 Bond =stimate, hereby incOrporat ea on page 6 hereof, as taken from [he +m prov ement plans Ii steC thereon by ppmner. Th¢ DeVelppeY shdll 3150 be rESpon slble for <onstr'JC- tiOn of any [ran si Lions or other incidental work be yontl [he tract bOUnddfle5 ds needed f0Y 5df ¢Sy dnd prpp2Y SUff aCe dr atnage. Errors ar ommissions discovered during con structin shall be corrected upon the tlirection of the City Engineer. Revised work tlue to said plan modifications shall be covered by the prOVisipos of Mis agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. "0. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer frog the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations 7is[e0 [hereon shall be obser vetl, with atten ti0n given to safety procedures, can trot of dust, noise, or etner ncisance f0 She area, and to proper notification of Dublfc utilities and Ci[y Departments. Failure to cOn01Y with this section mall be subject to the penalties Drov iOed therefor. 9. the Developer shall be responsible For removal Of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights-ot-way within Or adJ Dining said tle velopmen[ resulting from work relative to said development. 10. Mork done wi tM1in existing streets shall be diligently pursued tp completion; the Ci [y shall have the ri ghf • to complete any and all work in 'he event of unjustified delay in completioo, and to recover all cal ana expense incurred from the Developer and/or his contractor .y any lawful means. ll. Sold Developer sh a'.1 at all times following dedica- tion of the streets and easement; in said su bf divi lion, up t0 the completion and acceptance O/ said work or improvement by said City Council, glue good and adequate warning to the travel tng public of each and every dangerous condition existent in ;aid street or easement, and will protect [he [raveling public from such def ec[ive or dangerous cOndi liens. Unt11 the compte[1on of all Improvements, herein incorpOr a[ed on Page 6 [o be performed, each of said 5[ree is not accepted as improvements shall Oe under the charge of said Jevelpper. Said Developer may close alt or a portion of any street subject co the conditions contained in a temporary street closure permf t, issue0 Oy the Lity Engineer, whenever it !s necessary [o protect the public durf ng the con strut lion of the improvements herein agreed [o Oe made. 12. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after Other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as provided by Dr din ante in act ord an <e with the Olentinq diagram approved by the City Community Development Director. The Developer sh 371 be responsible far mal ntalning all frees planted fn goad health until the end of the guaranteed maintenance DeriOd, Or /or nne year after planting, whtGhever 15 later. 13. The Developer is re spOnsi Ole for meeting all cOndl. lions establisned by the City pursuant tp the Subdlvislon Map Act, City Drdiances, and this agreement for the development, and • for the maintenance o/ all improvements cpnitru oleo thereunder -2- J ~~ until the improvement is accept etl for maintenance by the City, anE no improvement security provided hereinwi th Sh a'.1 be re leas¢d bef Ore such acceptance unless other vise provided and autM1ori tea by the City Lo unc it of the City. 14. This ayr eem ent shall not termina!e unit the m ain[en an ce guarantee se curi:y hereinafter de scribed has been released by the City, or unti'. a new agr ee',ent tpgeth¢r with the required improvement security has been Su Dmi tteC tp Che Lity by a successor to [he herein named, and by res olutlon of th¢ City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and tDe improvement security therefor has been released. 15. The improvement security to be furnished Dy the Developer with this agreement shall consist of t".e foi lowing and shall be in a farm acceptable by the Lity Attorney: A. is secure faithful perf orm do ce of Chis oar eemen t. 1, A EOnd Of bonds by pne of more duly dPLhOr1L@d corporate sureties in [he form and content specified by Government f,cde Section 6fi4S9.t. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the farm and content specified by the City Act or ne y. G. A deposit wi Th the City of money or negotiable Don ds of the kind apProv eO for securing deposits of public monies. B. To secure laborers antl mat eri almen: 7. A bond or bonds by pne or more duly authorized COr pO rdCR sur¢C1e5 in the form and ConC@nt • specifie0 by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Imprevem ent Security Instrument Sn the form and content specif tea by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit wi:n Lity of money or negotiable bonds of Che k~nC appr oveC for geCUring L. A cash tleposit wi :h the City to guarantee payment by [he Developer c, the engineer or surveyor whose certi/i cake aD De ors upon the Final Map for the ze [tiny of all boundary, lot cprner, and street centerline mon umen is and for furnishfng centerline tie notes to the Lily. the amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer Or surveyor as acceptable Payment in full; ar, if n0 value is submi [tea, th¢ cash bond 5h all be as shown pn the Construction and Bond Estimate con coined h er¢in. Satd cash deposit may he refunded as sopn as proce- dure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie hates and written assurance pf payment in full from the engineer ar surveyor. 0. Tne required bonds and [he principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement. 16. The Oevelo-er warrants that the imps c':°^'°^rs descN Ded fn tMS agreement shall he free from defects in materials and wo rk manihip. Any and a71 portions of the lmprpve- ments f0u nd [o be def ectlve within One (I) Year follow ing the data on wM ch the improiem ents are accented by the Lf ty Shaii De repaired or re0l acetl by Developer free Of ail charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equal to ten pert en[ (10%} Of the construction estimate or 5200.00, whichever is greater, to Secure the fat thfut performance of Oev et oDer's Obt (gatf ohs as tlescri Ded to this Dara- graph. The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the /ai th/ul performance by the Developer o/ any obligation of the -3- Developer to do specified work with respect [a any parkway mdln[en dnCQ 355 e5SmQnt dlStriC G. Dote thQ imOfDVQOQn is have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security nos been accepted by the- Lity, the other improvement security described in this agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise au [M1Oriied by the Subdivision Map Act and any applicable Lity Ortlinance. l7. Tnat Lhe Developer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him antl any con[^ac [or or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may dYiSe blcaUSe Of LhQ ndLUfe Of Lfle Mork Or ffOm Oper d210p5 Under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any cdntractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or Indirectly emplpyetl by said persons, even thpugh such damages he no[ caused by the negligence of [he Developer ar any can tr ac tar or subcontractor ar anyone employed by said persons. the public liability and property damage fnsurance shall list the Lity as additon al insured and directly protect the City, itz o(f icerz, dgln[s dOd QmplnyCes, d5 well a5 Lhe OIVelOpef, h15 CUO tr dG2Ur5 and his •abcontractor s, and all insurance policies issued lie reunder eapll so state. the minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily injury or death liability limits of not less tha 5300,000 far each person and 51,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and Droperty damage liabil- ity 1lmi is of not less than $100,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of • 5250,000 far claims which may arise from the opera- tions of the Developer in the performance of the work herein prpvidxd. Automobile iiabi'i[y lnsur ante ccve^ing alt vehicles used in [he pe rf ermance pf this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits Of nOt less than 32DD,D DO fOf edch perspn and 5300,000 far each accident or occurrence, and Droperty damage liability limits of not Less than 150,000 far each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than 5100,000 which may arise from the opera- tiens of the Oevelpper or his Contractor in perf arming the work provided for herein. 18. That before the a+ecution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate ar certificates of insurance covering the speciffetl insurance. Each such certificate shall bear an endars ement pre<l ud ing the cancellations, or reduction in coverage of any pal icy evlaences by such certificate, befb re the eepiration of thirty (30) days after the City shall have received notification by registered mail from the insurance carrier. As evitlence of untlerst ands ng the provisions contalneO hereto, and of intent to comply with same, the Subdivider has su bmf tied the fallowing described improvement secvri ty, an0 has affixed his signature hereto: -4- is..• ~3 stn a roWCMU LU6re1Uh61 ' ' ENGIY EERING DIVISION • ~ ENCROACi;4ENT 'JERNIT FEE SCHEDULE 'far (mprpve'fen:: TRFCT 'i0. 'M9! Date: '~~*,:~ ~.capu:e y: _ ^v,.. - ^ssac. ,:,File Re. e•ence; ,.:y Crewing 'c. ~- ' NOTE Wes not 1~tude current lee for ,,, 4riting permit or paremmt tleposits OL'AVT;'r gy;• DDrr Ci;y. " P.:.C. curb - :2" C.f, 24^ gutter 7,25 T-?T x c:rp - 9^ C. F. 2G" 5v ['-er 6.G0 -?'+a. A.C. berm <,50 - _ " S. F, "rive apprpa6n 2.iC -"-_ 3 ~ $r, 3" P.C.C. cross gut;er (ire, cur c; 3.<] _ _ - S.F. - Pr¢para:i cr of zupgrade 0.:6 _ S. F, Crushed agg, base ;per inch th!c Y, C.C3 -'OV F.C. ;pve• :390 tons; 27.:0 ' TCA ;9G0 [o '300 Cons) 35.:0 'CY F.C. (i00 to 900 tons) ti. CC 25.59 i.00 - ~ F.C. ;ender 600 Cons) 50.00 _ . F. S A.C. (3^ [hick) C. Si ~- S.E. Pat cn A,C. (trench) :. IS ~~"- S.%. :" [nick d. C. over'aY 9.10 ' __ EA. AC,'v st sewer ma"Aare :p grace 25^. C0 Ed. Fd;ust zewe^ c!een put ': 9•LCe :S9. CC ^- Ad:ua: waver va:v¢s :p grace )S.C: Ed. S;ree< !i grs 10:0.90 2 0 0.00 " • :: F. ' 9arrrcaCes ;inter sec 5500 nln) 2 a a" reewopd peace- 1.':.. .;i ` S, F, 12 xenaval o/ F.C. per a^en: 7.75 :'-?~'CJ _ EA. S:r eat signs 2:0.00 EF, Ref'ec [pR and DDas rS '^ ~~>1 L F ' Concre!e bitty wa" 25. CO c F - aetain roS waa 2C.C] ~ ~ AY ~ AA9 negate Sase 1. 9C !~?r; 9 - C. ". Concrete s: rvc :ores a26.CC ' 10" 9CP (20:0 0) 29. CO ` 36" R.' 2000 J) 69.:7 ~ So'f. r] ' F 46" RCP (0290 0) 76.':0 EA, Catch basin N • d' 2000.W 1 En, Catch basin 'd 0' 2900.^: 5.900.00 EA. - Catch basin A 22' GSC0. 00 ` EA. _ Lpcal Eeoress :En a' SCC.CO ' ` EA. lpGdl E¢pfeS5 i09 :2' lD."i0. 37 EA. Cunc[ipn structure 6000.:0 'EA. Outlet strut [ore, Std N506 ` C. CO - EA. ~ Outlet strut Gre, SCC ISC7 SDG.D7 - e.A. Guard pasts CO. CO -" L.F. Guard panel !wood) 25.CJ i-J-J LF. Sawcut 2,00 1 16c. 00 EA. Headwall (dB" wf n3) 4000.00 -~'C'L~;uO _ L.F. Racwodd heaE er :. IS `- S.F, LanESCap!nS 6 Irr iga:!pn 2,75 L,f, Rol1 cur0 ;P,C. C.) 7.50 530 L.f. 30' 0..C.P, (2000-0) d2. 00 72•-i 9'6'CRO ~ ENGINEE0.lNG iN5PEC11CN fEE ' Q 615.00 $UB TOTP3, 92,501.55 MIES70RAT10N/OELIYEAT108 CASH s o 0 0 .oD CONTINGENCY COST$ ~-' 0 •Oe OEPO6IT (REfONDAOIE ) FAITHFUL PERfCRNANCE BOND (l00%) Bog eee.e0 fbNUNENTATICN SURETY (CASN) 2e SD0.00 LA00R AHO MATERIAL 90Np (SO%J ~ nnn.n0 '~.Mlrsumt to Clty o/ geMno Cucawan9, Municipal COtle, Tttte I, CMpter LOA, adOptlrq Sn ' • Nrn,rdlra Caunq code Tlt las, Chapters 1.5, , cash restonetcn/dell m,tton Mpostt sMll ' 4.ade pM pr to 1ssu,Ma o/ ,n En9lneeH lg Construction Penn R. FPITHF UL PFRf ORNPNLE Type: P•inc'o al :ro ur :: i10:,^.00.00 AL 3ARA~R 3p\JS Va^e a'rtl a.d r?SS :f sprety; fi9i [ Sp r._¢[ Les Ay¢1¢s •CA. 9puii NP TE RI PL qN0 LANOR Type: +r in cinal Anaun!: iE:,^,0;.00 P.L saluEp, acsLs \a".e dnd 3d dre55 Of sing :y: b2i c>>a~mnaaGCle: scr ¢e" L ASN OEPOS CTalIUIR~At~I}A11v01~~ T Ype: Principal dnpun;: S?,SOC.00 Ha-= and ad dress n` s'.:rety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACGEPTAN[E OY THE CITY iN b TV ESS FEREOF, the parties herg:p have eaa sed 'rgse presets to be du iy executed and ac'e nowied ge 'd'tn all --z'~ gs required b/ law pn Che dates se `forth opposite their Srgnd 4'es. ~ tee-.~av o topj~/p9c C•'r.. L,c. 0 ateld 1 by (e'~F. CCf.TI , LeYelGpCr Signature Leoq rNens 'riotetl ]ate by Leve'oper • St 9na :.-e accepted: Ci [y of Aar. cho Cucamonga, Cal iron r.ia A Municipal Corocrtl pn Oy: _ Attest Mayan ~ ., _. Appravea: /~.'! / p ? ' City PTt rn ey __ ~ Mp e ~ ~ ~ ' on M M aN u r - rv i ' IC.wEw~orl .~w.w tTPTT OI GYNONMM ~ 1WUNTY O. L~Au(wElf) J rn c r5B ~ Mfs. r. rM r'Mrg1 • NMMF NW r rV aM r- rMMwg.n.rr PYwMOI WwMrw ~MOrwW1W eI WNMa01Y MrwrMMy FrM~.M aw„ul ' EIa«W wrrEraM F~irr Y n a r M wrN IYWMwY wi4ewMM y =.~.,. erFirl,~L sEAL R, r, -!+e Er Nexbl: • ~M ~ -~W.~\~Y_jt` IM ~1aIY lYCYMaMYW L >rw~iM 1M CorMalr ` N .• :';~V:i':[.._::v '~ Y .\;1 ~~ a~ II ~5 EVGI ~ f~ ~OUth Y ewwW W _"_ irwrr W MEna.wM ry'o•, n . a"n ¢. ;±a+ ,w r uW Md wrTMwM eMMIM aM rnAr Mq~ NN~+waww ~~ w • w el w ITNEN MYMV ~ pEY wIweW MW wO RESOLUTION N0. E02-06-0BfF " ~ - ~~ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT "!0. 12091 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12091, consisting of 248 Condominiums, submitted 6y Rancho Verde, Subdivider, located on the east side of Grove Avenue at 8th Street has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is • authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authe et, City Jerk jaa -: , . z:' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~c c.~arq ' STAFF REPORT ~° "~ • 5Q`~7 Z _ ~ `1''z GATE: Fehruary 6, 1985 _' 19" T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer 3Y: Barbara Kroll, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Bonds and Agreement for Tracts 12590-1 through 6 located on the north side of Base Line Road and the east side of Haven Avenue submitted by Lewis Homes of California Tracts 12590-1 through 6 was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on July 11, 1984 as tentative Tract No. 12590 for the division of 39.7 acres into 215 lots within the Terra Vista Planned Community. An Agreement and bonds have been submitted in the following amounts to guarantee the installation of off-site improvements: • Faithful Performance Bonds 5910,000.00 Labor and Material Bonds 5485,000.00 Letters of approval have been received from Chaf f ey Union High School, Alta Loma School District and Cucamonga County Water District. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the acceptance of bonds and agreement and the signature of said map. R~tfully ubmi ted, ~ / LBH: :kro Attachments lrJ _~~ ~~ Y --- --- -- •15N tltltl31 un.mun .. t! i w ° ° •' 3• is i '~ ~ o° ;: . . ,:, W ~ ~.. y.~Sf=if . 1 --_. ~ . c ~ il: =:r . - .. ' ~ . .. .. _ ...._ ... I - _ r r~ 11 ' _ 1 4 .. •_a_~\ t ~~1 ~ ... : . 1 i li , ~. _ ~, ~. ~ I• p ~ • f T . ~ k-~~ I .,i , ^ I ll) le 1 I ). '~ ~ ~ i lllNY \ \ •I ~? . ~n ~ j ~I~? `~'~ • g 4 h T - a !. ( ...~~. _.. . N a ~~ i j ~ ' 3 a - ~ T r allufy9r -r _~ , e : Y ~ ., i - . ~~ ~ ~ ~~-n e _ . ~ l ~ I s , "i d - ~ F ! I v 3. ~. ~. i . i 7 t° ~ i -F--..-. ' l i' ' .~ ' ` t f11MinY • r ~ r•) MfnYN _ 7_ •' I 1 w~ CHAFFEY J61NT UNION HIGH SCHOOI DISTRICT : '°•"'°°°° • O ]11 WEST FIfTX SigFfT. OYTGgIO CAIIf OgNln 91 )fi] - ., , O O O •r ./ir • i.y„ Se ay'ic it Cl~a lta "{,., stl ~ ~~~~~~ 9°a{n of rq u5 r({S ~... .. • - Y ._~ y • .. .. -. ,. ai liE (L1un.'3 ARV'.,, '-l [SY }'t!i i~ January 28, 1985 ( Letter of Certification ~ ~ ~ ~'+~`~" "•`;~n;;~~, of School District Capacity ~~ - •~~.~. Within the Chaffey Joint Union High School OiStrict attendance boundaries for the following described project: location/Description: Tract Nos. 12590 through 12590-6 NE Corner of Haven 8 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, CA Number of Dwellings: 211 single family dwellings Anticipated Completion Date: January 1986 The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 92 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion o the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of Callfarnia continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such mann=.r that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points, The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Apprcval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall validate such commitment. CC--~C*tPw Tfperiritendettt/ sst. superintendent cc: Planning Division by Dianne Alien 11._ _ ~~_ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~~~. Jerry Bryan LEWIS NOMES Box 679 Upland, CA 91786 ~y Alta Loma School District 93SO~F 9asellne Road • Post Olflce Boa 370 • Alta Loma. California 91701 • 719/9fi7~ JOMN E. McMU0.TRY Suprtlnlenden! FI.OTD M. STORK Pnsonnrl/SUpp•rt SrMa STAGY NELSON ewinp, SrMm MILLT STMIN Cu MCUIum/SpaHa(/nJp, Established 1885 Jar uan 25. i995 Date 60AP0 OF TRl1S1EEi ROBERT S. FROST ROBERT W TANGE MAN MRS. LIZ GALLARI NI MRS. SANORA A. OERLY JOHN C. BOOR LETTER OP CERTIFICATION FOR SCBOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY For Residential Construction within the Alta Loma School District. DEVELOPER Let:is Hones of California (Term 1'i st al TRACT NUMBER 1?590 LOCATION Sorth of Baseline, [last ak 'la•'en, 6or ~,..,., coon ,tea n•„~ r.,.,,:~ F1 ~r.,1 ~r,,,r ~,t .F,,, nl NUMHE P. OF DWELLING UNITS ~tl •;,,Ff„ f,,,;l~. ANTI CZPATED COMPLETION DATE 5„~„~e fo¢c Gentlemen: The Alta Loma School District hereby certifies that the capacity for _yy~~ students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy F. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any suc- cessor Act, in such manner that the State Allocations Board may fund all school 6uilr]ing projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from Che date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90 day period shall validate such commitment. • Very truly yours, ~t[t-C/~ ~. II ~ IXKA.J'/ Stacy W. Nelson ,ldministrator of Business Services • jh cc: Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga ~// CITY OF 0.AXCN0 CUCIIMONGA IMPROVE KENT N60.EEMENi F00. Tract Nos. 12590-1-6 KN ON ALL MEN DV THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered iota, in conformance with tM1e provi signs of the $u bdi vision Map Act of the Staie Of California, and of the ap pl i<ahie Ordinances of the City of Ran chO LucamOng a, California, a municipal torpor a[ion, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the Li ty, and Lewis Development Lo. hereinafter referred to as the CevelOper. NITNESSETH: THAT, NNEREAS, said Developer desires t0 develop certain real property in said Lity as shown on the conditionally approved Subdivision known as Tract Nos. 12590-1-6; and NHE RE AS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said peveloper as prerequisite to approval Of said subdivision generally located on the east side Of Haven, north st de of Baseline Road. HON, iNEAEFORE, 1t is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The Oev eloper hereby agrees to construct at • Deveiope is expense alt improvemen [s described on Page 6 here- of wf thin twelve months from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement sha'1 be effective On the date of the resol utinn Of [he Lovncil of said Cfty approving this agreement. This agreement sh al' be in default on the day fallow- ing the tlrst anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of tfine has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitted f0 the City in wri [ing not less than 3D days before the expiration date hereof, and shall <on fain a statement o/ circumstances nece ssitating the extension of time. The City shall have the right tq review the prgvisi ons of this agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to requf re adJustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof, 4. If the Developer (ails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the Hgh[ a[ any time to cause said pr ovisi0ns to be met by any laM ul means, and thereupon 'recover from the Developer and/or his surety [he full cost and expense incurred. 5. the Developer shalt provide metered waL er service to each lot Of said development in accordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Nater District, 6. The Developer shall be responsible for reptacemen t, relocaLi on, or removal of any component Of any irrlgati qn eater system in conflict with construction of required impr ov ement5 to the satisfaction Of [he Cl ty Engineer and the oener of such water System. L~1~. y/ ]. Improvements regal red to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Spe<if stations of the Lity, and Co the Improvement Plan approved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Said fmprov em en is are tabulated on the Construction and Band Estimate, hereby incorporated on page fi hereof, as taken from the improvement plans Listed thereon by number, The Developer shall also be res ponsi Dle for canstruc- timn of any transitions or other in cioenial work beyond [he tr acl boundaries as needed for safety and Dro per surface drainage. Errors or ommi ssions discovered durf ng cons tructin shalt be cor rectea upon the direction of the Lily Engineer. Revised wa rk due to said plan modifications shall De covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original Dlanned works. 8. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the Lity Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall De ob Served, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notif scat ion of public uti lilies and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section shall be suhj ect to the pan alts ei pr pvided theref cr. 9. The Develpp er shall De responsible for removal of ail loose rocks and other debris from Oublic rights-pf-way within or ad3 of nfng said development resulting from work relative to said development. t0. Nork done within existing streets shall De dil igen!ly pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjutt if led delay in • <om pleti on, and tD recover ail cost and expense incurred from the Developer and/or his cpntractmr ty any lawful means. 11. Said Developer shall at alt times fallowing dedica- tion of the streets one easements In said ~~'. ids visi on, up to the completion and ecce ptance of said work or improvement by said L sty Council, give good and adegu ate warning [o :be travel :ng public of each and every dangerous conClti nn exist ent in said street or easement, and will prof e.c the vaveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. Until the completion of all i.mprov em ent s, herein incorporated on page 6 to he perto rmetl, each of said streets not accepted as improvements shall be under the charge of saitl Oeve toper. Safd Developer may close ail or a pprtion of any street subject to the fonds Lions contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued by the CS ty Engineer, whenever It is necessary to protect the public during the construction o/ the improvements herein agreed to De made. 12. Parkway trees reRU tree to De planted sha it be planted by the Developer after other impr ov emeni work, grading and clean vp has been completed. Planting shall De done as provided by Drdinan ce in accordance with the planting diagram approves by the Lity L00m 1'el ty Development Director. the bevel op er shall be responsible far maintaining all trees planted {n good he ai[h until the end of the gu aranieeO maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is tat er. 17. The Developer is responsl Ole for meeting all condi- tions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision MaD Act, Li ty Or dfances, and cols agreement far the ae uelopment, and . for the mat oleo an ce of all improvements coniL rutted thereunder _2. • I d until the improvement is accepted for maintenance by Che Ci[y, dnd n0 ImprpV em ¢O[ 22<Ori ty pfovld¢d herojnyi[h shall b! released before sy<h acceptance unless otherwise prOVi tled and authorized by the Ci[y Council of Che City. 14. This agreement shalt no[ terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has be¢n released by the City, or until a new agr ee.m enc together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a succ¢ssor to the herein named, and by resol uti0n Of the City Council same has been accepted, and This agreement and the improvement security therefor has been released. 15. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptable by the City Alta rney: A. i0 secure fat th tul performance of this agreement. 1. A band or bonds by one or more duly authorized c orgorate sureties in the Porm and content specified by Government Code Section fi6499.1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of [he kind approves for securing deposits of public monies. B, To secure laborers and maters almen: 1. A bond Or bonds by one or more tluly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Cade Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvem en: Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit wi :h Ci[y Of money or negotiable bands of the find approved for securing C. A cash deposit e;th the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to Me engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Fin a1 Map for the setting of all boundary, lot corner, and scree[ centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline tfe notes To the City. The amount of the deposit may he any amount certffied Oy the engineer qr surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Lonstructtoe and Bond estimate contained herein. Said cdih deposit may be refunded d5 5000 a5 prOte- Oure permits after receipt by the City of the [en[eriine tie nOteS dnd wri [Ten dSSUr do Ce of Dayment in full /rom the engineer or surveyor. D. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof dre set forth On page 6 0( [his agreement. ifi. The Developer warrants that the imDrov ements described In this agreement shall be tree from Aelec is 1n ma[eriats and workmanship. Any and a71 por ti mss of the improve- ments found to be defective within one (1) year following the data on which the 7mprnv ements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer Tree of all charges t0 the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee securf Ty fn a sum equal [o ten percent (10X) of [he cans tr uctlan estimate or f2D0.00, whichever is greater, to secure the fatthf ul per/orm ante of Developer's abligatf ons as described in this pera- • graph, the matntenan ne guarantee security shall al s0 secure the faith/u1 pert arm an ce by the Devet oper 01 any Obiigatton of the •~- ~~ 7 Developer to do specified work with respect to any parkway maintenanc¢ assessment district. Once She improvemen [s have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has oe en accepted Dy the City, [he otter improvement security described in this agreement may De releases provided that such release is otherwise autharif ed by the Subdivision Map Act and any applicable City Ordinance. U . That the OeveloDer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor Oerf Arming work covered by this agreement from claims far property damages which may arise because c1 the nature of the work or from Doer arsons under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any con tT actDr or su DCOntract or, or anyone directly or indirectly empiayed by said De rs ons, even though such damages De not cause0 by [he negligence of the Oevel oDer ar any contractor or subcontrdctor or anyone employed by said persons. The puDl is liability and property tlamage insurance shall list the Lity as additonal insured sad directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subconcr actor s, ana all insurance poi icier ixsu ed hereunder shall so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: A. Con[r attar`s liability in5ur ante providing botlily injury or death liabil[ty limits of not less tha $700,000 for each person and 51,000,000 /or each accident or occurrence, and property damage liabil- ity limits o/ not less than 5700,000 for each acct- dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of 5250,000 for tl alms which may arise from the oDera- • tfons of the Developer in the performance of Me work herein provided. d. Automobile liability insurance covering all VBhtclef of 2d In the perform dnc¢ DI Chis dgreemen[ providing bodily inf ury liability limits of noe less than 5200,000 for each person and 5700,000 for each accident or occurrence, and pr operfy damage liability limits of not less than SS 7,000 Por each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than f100, 000 which nay arise from the opera- tions of the Oevel over or nis Contractor in performing the work provided far herein. 18. That before the ezecutiDn of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the Ciiy a certificate or certi/icatef of insurance covering the specif led insurance. Each such <er[ffica[e shall Dear an endorsement precluding the cancellations, or re ductian in coverage of any Doticy evidences by such <ertif irate, before the expiration o/ thirty (70) days after the City shall have received notification by r¢giscered mall from Lhe insurance card er. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and D/ Integt to comply with same, the 5ubdiv ider has submitted the following described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: • -4- © I+ ~I '~ FAITHFUL PE0.FORNANCE type: Bonds ?rincipal 4s,o un t: S9i0 DDD.DD Name antl ad deoss of surety: NATE0.IAL ANO LA800. PAYMENT type: aooaa vr;nc;pal ;r~n'dA:; saEE,ooD.oD Name and address of surety: CASH DEP OSIi NUNUNEXTATION Type: Cash Principal Ampun t; 510.200.00 Y ame and address df Svrety: MAINTENANCE GUNRNNTEE ?roe: Prin cipat dmopn t: Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO NCCEPTANCE RY THE CITY IN NI?NESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to he tluly ex el;u'.^d and ac'e nosrl edged with a71 to r^lali:ies re pv fired by lae nn tre da' F set forth apposite their slgnd:ur es. Lh'"n(5 I .iLOP ICFS CJ. Date LD'vs by I ~~ ,0eveloper pl gn ure tinted Date by rln ted Accepted: C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, C al if ornfa A Municipal Lorporatton Developer IA[ml nl P, n n[r, hipl S rarf Ji Laq r00.M1p ~ 55 1 COLNtt aS _ .Vtl 9F.PoYAPD SV04_ 1 r~„_ Ja`ia ry a, t99i .Mare me m[ooeen [n[a [%onn e.e;,r } .n rM lpl um nne, perpamr rppenN Richard A. L@v1s 9Yn[~n to mewl[,M .I,milO of rM pN.vMip rMt mld y ,M w~N~n n,wmmrvd rtL,w~INaad rem [ iMr._M-n[[urN rM Vme(er uWmM+Il el u~d Prlrminp [rd lA[Ied p.rumMip w<.vrN rM rnM `4'IiNESS Mnd rM Ollrtnl I ~/~ ` ^ Y ~ ~~^~i^, F, ~ ~Dfin A t~ ROe NSON -"'=°a ~ r r j s~[p[.r ` v>=_lS- om a L q i! Wna A. fto6 Lnsan \~ ; `~~~rr r<ew p l.p rt~bnJpJ 1 Nrmr ITrpN w Pnrtlt '~_ IEI pL~ T,rw Y[w4rprMmm °,;~'- i7 • RESOLUTION N0. -E82-O6-09R-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCRMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROV Eh1ENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL h1AP OF TRACT NOS. 12590- 1, 12590-2, 12590-3, 12590-4, 12590-5 AND 12590-6 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12590, consisting of 170 lots, submitted by Lewis Development Company, Subdivider, located on the north side of Base Line Road, east side of Haven Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 2B of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the l mprovement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication far public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same • on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y ut a et, City erk jaa /~W nrmv no n n err vn nr•n w n.rnwrn n STAFF REPORT DATE: February 6, 1985 T0: City Councii and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer ~,,.,..,. ANC e% r ~ II'- 1V. SUBJECT: Approval of Bonds, Agreement and Final Map of Tract 11781 located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue submitted by Daly Construction • The attached Bonds, Agreement and Final Map of Tract 11781 are submitted for Council approval. The pro,~ect is a division of 6.4 acres of land into 76- condominiums located on Hermosa Avenue. The subdivision was tentatively approved by the Planning Commission on April 22, 1981 and extended for 12 months on April 11, 1984. The bond amounts submitted are as follows; Faithful Performance Bond: 592,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 546,000.00 RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that City Counct adapt the attached resolution aoprovinq Tract Na. 11181, accepting the Bonds and Rgreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign on behalf of the City. Respectfully n LB .JS:Jaa Attachments "! / • ~ r 11(-~~ II ~ { FC ; FG w ~]~ ` I ' l I ~ i'll!~~~'L ~ I'g~~~~~~' - ~~ it ~~lM II _ :r~N~ ._ ~ I~ Iy ---r yc:=.. 1~'~ y f~a ~ I _ nJ.~ G : F : ~'2.-_,_~.I f'.ITITT~a I;I,.~._''..ni...l i.E\1 ~ D I ~~~~~~~~~r~~~ ~~r^~~~~/~~~ ~p~ 1:~._ ' ,p ~rc ~,~ -.~ a ~irtl~Bl ~ n~ll+ ~~: q ~~rr1=,=.;., ~ ~~1f'~1 ^ ~IjI~FIP.~, I'A' 1~1~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' • s~ _~ ~^ a y~~~, ^= of *l~r~,i~' o ENGINEERING DIVISION C ~ z ~ VICINITY bU\P !m ~t~' / \ ,~ N page - ,w...,_...... ...... -.... CHAFFEY JO~Nt UNION HIGH SCHOOI DISTRICT ~~~~~~~~~~:~~-~ O ill WESt flfiN j!u([' ' December 4, 1984 ~O (r~`~\~\, Letter of Certification ((('JJJ~ `u% of School District Capacity Within the Lhaffey Joint Ur,ion Hioh School District attendance boundaries for the following described project: Location/Description: Tract No. 11625 - 102 condos Tract No. 11181 - 73 condos 19th Street 8 Hermosa in Rancho Cucamonga Number of Dwellings: 175 • Anticipatetl Completion Date: December 1985 The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 26 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund ail school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall ~ralidate such commitment. ...... SvperiTrtendt~tt/Assts Superintendept by Dianne Allen /~^(~(~~[?, cc: Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonca Darrell Connerton DALY CONSTRUCTION 9310 Baseline Rd., St. 102 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 987-8024 ~f y Roy E. Daly Construction Corporation ~0 December 11, 1984 Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs, Daly Construction Corporation respectfully requests the annexation of Tracts 11625 and 11781 into the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call at • (714) 987-8024. S' cerely ar onnerton Project Manager DC/mm • ~`G California Office (714) 987.8024 9310 Baseline • Suite 102 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~w~ y ' ~ -" ROBERT NEUFELp y,/ src.remv. Gmev1 Mn.ope. . CUGAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOVO W. MICHAEL q..no.. ~6 a'. '~,~ •- _ .. EA RLER ANbER50N BEVERLY E OR ADEN VICTOR A. CMERRA N. JR.. P-nMrnt CHARLES A WEST January 23, 1905 City of Rancho Cucamonga ' Engineering Department P. O. Box 807 ' Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: John Martin Gentlemen: Roy E. -aly s Company, Developez of Tract No. 11781, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, has deposited with this District a Material . and Labor Bond, a Faithful Performance Bond, and a Utilities Improvement Agreement for waterline and se~.:erline construction. These bonds and agreements are being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. Presently, the sewer and water improvement plans have not been approved. If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ~/i L / Betty F.ten Secretary b Alta Loma School I~ilstric~~ 93 SO~F 8aselinc Road Post Olr¢c Boa 3]0 AI^ Loma. L'aiito:nu 91701 • 71A/9~6~ JOIIN 9. McM VPTI Supenmrndmr fLOYO AI, STORt Peaonnrl/SUpyort Srn STAGY NELSON 4uilnrti StM[u AfILLY STRAIN Cumrulu,NSpralal ho IisWblimhrd il)lli _____ Snvembe: li, 1954 agARU OF TRUSTEES ROHEiiT 5 FROSt IIOIII:NI l': I A.4GE\!.\ MNS LI% (:ALLANI NI Mlq ).1N UN1 .1 aElll.l JGIM l RUOR L;~:':'TCR or ctalrrlo-'ICTrrzov roa scllooL ur,~~r~atr!' cr,i~,-,cl^~: Por Residential Construction wi Ciun the A.Lta Loma S: hoot District. UC':'~LOP CR_ Da1v Construction 3AC :' ?. Uh!r\IfR_._.11781 ___,_ L0:'~'fl(Yd Itiest side of hiermos=between f{iy_hland_and 19th Streets. _ _ PII'I •I'. P:!! ~~P I1WIi LLINC UNITS i3 Condominiums A":'I'iCLI~i,'1'1': i7 C(1?I I'L;('. lJN LllLPG 1;,riY 1956 • I gun C i.au~•n ...> ?1 to Lorry School Di stt ict ilerL•by ccr of ies that the capacity for 21.9 stu~'cn is will be provided within 24 months of the comple[ion of the abo•.;e project. This certif icaticn is given on the r_onuis ion thnt the State of i:al ifornia continues to ftmd Clrc pr~.]v isior.s r„ the Le: oy ['. Grecnu i.ease/DUCCim se Act of J976, or any suc- cessor Act, in such manner CII~IL the tital•e Allocali('m:: Doard may Fund all school build iug projects umlcr its currant rules and regulations without priority points. 1'he comet: linen[ n[ this capaci Cy shaJ.l c:pire 50 days f. rom the date of Chic ]otter. App rovnl of the final mao or the is suancp of building perrni rs by thn City of Rancho ~ucanlonya wi Lhiu LhaC 9U day putirnl :;h,lll valt~:a LO such r:n,mi tmen C. Very Cruly yrmrs, ~~,ry~~} I V~.o.~-~+~ ~ .~.W- tiLacy YI, Ncl.un • AJlni ni.r r:rtnr of flu.incss Scrvi cos jh 1 ~ cc: Planning Uivisiuii Ci Cy of Ir•un-hu Cue mnonya cnr oP rtnbcrto cutgnoncA IXP0.0YEMEHT AGREfMENi FOR ~ TMCT 11]Bl KNON All MEtt 6T infSE P0.ESENig: Thal this agreement is made end entered into, in conformance ,n to the pravisiunt of the SV6div is ion Hap Att il/ tnr StaCe of Cal iforn te, antl Of the aDPliceple Ordinances of the City of poncho Ca<amon9a, Ca)7f Ornia, a mun is spat corpora Lion, Dy and petwean sa 1J City, hereinafter rrof erred LO as tAt City, anJ koy E. Daly and Comna nY herelnaf ter retefred to as the ~CVe1o DOr. NITMES$ETH: THAI, UNEREAg, said Developer dxslres to develop certain real proper ty In Bald h ty as Shown On the cOnO r6~onally ap pr OVed aubOtv55i0n knOwp a2 Tract !IO. 11701 ~ en0 NN FREAS, said h ly has estd0l lined certain requirements t0 be met by sdid Develpper es prerequu Re tq apDr oval of said subdtvis ton generally loca[td at Northwxst corner of lYth Street and Hermosa Avenue NON, THEREFORE, it 1s nero0y agreed by said City and by said Dev alp Der as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees [o construct at Dare toper's expense ail iupr ov ementx Jzscrsbed On Puge 6 here- of within twelve moo tits from the eFfec[iv@ date here0(. 2. [hit agreem MF shall be of (active on [he date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. ih iz ogre em[nt Snell be to default on the day to ltow• ing the first anniversary date of sofa approval unlest an t%ten- sion of time nos teen granted oy said City as hereinafter provid- ed, B. Tne Developer may request an z%[ensiCn of time to complete [h¢ [arms ncrtof. Such request shall Oe suumttt ed to the City in writing not less than BD nays before the e%pir atlgn due hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances ne cesiitat jn9 the c%tension of time. Tne CttY shall nave the n gh[ to revleN the Drov is tons of this agreement, including th@ COnS tf ULtlOp StdOdBr ds, COSt eft sm ate, and lillpf pVemen[ iCCUf sty, and to require adjustments thereto if any Sv OStanttal change has dccu rred during the term hereof. 4. If the Developer falls pr neglects to comply with the provisions of tots ayre einent, the City Snell nave lhz right at any' trine [o cause said Drovitio ns to Oe met by any lawful meen5, end thereupon recover from the Developer and/qr his surety the full case dnd expense incurred. 5. The Developer snail provid0 mxlered water service to each sot Of said developing nt fn accorUance wLLh Ue regulations, scne du lei, dnJ fees p! tn[ CUC diagnyd County Natgl Di1tric 1. 6, Tne Developer shall De responztble for replacement, relocation, or removal of any <Onip on@nt of any lrrfgaU on water system to conlL tt w n h construction of required improv@ments to the tdUSle<tion of the Ci[y Engineer and thz Ownu of taco water system. -I- Tfltts dnd Comaflnd. P.M. ~ 3 1. Improvements required [o De cans [r vatea snail conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard SVec lfam bons of the City, and to the Improvement plan epproved by and on file in the of h ce o/ the City En glnxe r, yard improvements are tabulated • on the Cons<ruetion and Dona Es[imatx, her eoy incorDOrated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the improvem enl Dians listed [hereon by numoer, the Developer shall also be resDOnsthle (or cons[ruc- [100 Of dny [rdpiit ions Or p[h!r 1nC ttlidtdl work beyond lht tr dCt 00400dr iii d5 needed fOf Sa(Q[y dnd DY(ID2f sort aC! tlf ainagC. Errors pr ommiss ions discovered do n rig construe tin shall to co rrx ted upon the Direction of [he hty Engineer. Revised work due [o said plan modtf is at wns shall he <ov 2re0 Dy the provin ohs of this agreement and secured Dy [he surety coven n9 the original planned works. 8. Eons[r vctlbn permits shall De obtained by the Developer from the office of the Ctty Engtneer pn or to star[ of work; ell regulations lis [ed [hereon snail De DDS erveJ, with an ent ton given to sefety prpceJUros, cp ntrol of dust, no de, or other nufsancx [o the area, antl to proper hoist xation of publ u ul ilities and City Dl Dart:ne nts. Failure to comply with tots sec [ion mall be sutj ect to the penal n es provided therefor, 9. The Developer shall De ,•asDOnsiOle (or removal of all loose rocks and other debris iron public rigs is-of •wey withan or ad]oining said developin ¢nt res4ltvtg from work relative to fd5d Oevelopmen t, 10, Mork done within existing streets shall De 0111gently pursued to completion; the Criy mall have the right '~I to cpmDlete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, antl to recover all cos[ and expense incurred from the Developer and/or his <onQrac[or Dy any lawful Weans. 11. Said Developer Shall at all times following Dedica- tion of the streets and eas emen[s in said :ubidiv ision, up to the completion and ac<e Dl once of sold work ar improvement by seed • City Council, glue gpod and adequate warning to the traveling D4b1 it Of edCh dnd every ddOgerO US Cpb!lt ion PxiS LP nL in Sald street or easement, and will protect tot traveling Puoltc from such defective or dangerous conditions. Un[fl the completion of all improvements, hereto incorpdreted on Page 6 t4 De performed, each of sa td streets not ac Ce p[ed as smp roveinen is shall be unJCr tl~e ch arye of saiA Oevel4 per. Said Developer may close all ar a portion of any street suo)ect to [hP <ondiltgni conlaineJ in a te~npdrary street clasur¢ permit, isiueD by the City Engtneer, wnenev er it is necessary ro protect the public dur in9 the construe tion of the imDrovemxn[s herein agreed to be made, ' l2. Parkway trees required to be planted shall De planted oy the Developer after e[hxr improvement Work, grading and cleanup has Deen completetl. Planting shall De done as provided by Oralnance in accordance with [he pidnt ing diagram apDr ov ed by the City Community Oxvdlppmxnt Director. The Developer mall De responn bee for maintaining all trees '• "planted In good health unn I the enJ Of tn¢ gu er anteed maintenance period, or (or one year after planting, whichever is later. U. the Developer is re sp onslDle far meee in9 ell conDi- [lons establ isneD by [ne Ctty pw'suant to the Svadlvision -2- ~l../ MoD Act, City Ordiences, and this ogre an¢nt for the development, ~ end for tae maintenance df all impravemen is constructed the rtund<r un[fl fnP Improvement IS accz peed fee maintenance by ~ the Ci[Y, and no Improvement secu my prov toed nerzlnw stn snail De released Defar< such acceptance unlasi other wise provided and author lted Dy tAe U [y C6unCl1 0( the h [y, 14. This agreement shall nOt terminate until the ma{nt enen<t quaran tee secu my herrenaf ter descn bed has been released Dy the Ca[y, or umfri a new agreement toga lher with the required impr oveme nt 's ecvri ty has been suhini [t ed to the City by a successor [o the here do named, and Dy resolution of lDe City Councli Scone has been auep[ed, and IA is agreement and the improvement security tneret or nos been vale asetl. De veto art wifA cue em provement security to b< furnished Dy tAe p is ayrcem znt shall cons ut of the fallowing and shall De in a form acceptable by the City 0.[[or nay; A. To secure faithful Derf dr manse of this agreement. 1. A Gond or bonds by ono Or pore duly au [hooted corporate curet sat in the form and cgntent spe<if i¢G Dy Government Code Section 66@99.1. 2. An Improvement Secure ty instrument en lne farm and content Sptc i(eeo by [he City A[[qr ne y. 7. d depose[ with tree City of money or negotiable oonJi of [he kfnd approved for ie curing deposits of DuDl ee monies. 8. To secure laborers and mater ialmen: 1. A bond or oonds by one or more duly autndrjied corporate sure[ aes in the form and content sp ecelied by Gover cone nt Cooe Szction 66499.1. T. An Improvement Security Instrument in the /orm • and content specefied Dp the City Pttorney. 7. q de Dgsit with Ci[y of ino nay qr negotiable bonds df tree kind approved for seroring C. A cash deDOSrt with the Laty to guarantee payment by tree Oeve lapis [o tnd en glnoer or surveyor wn ose certificate appears upon tree final Map for tnN setting of all 6ountlar y, lot corner, and str@et centerline monuments and fur (urn lS hin9 ce nter tine tie notes to the City. The amqun[ of tree deoonc mdy be any amount certllied Dy the <nglnezr or sury¢yor as accept ablx payment ir. full; or, if no value n su bme tted, the cash Dond th all be as shown on tAe Construction and Bono Estimate coot wined Ae re tn. Sato cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proce- dure permits after receipt ay the City of the centerline tie notes and written ats ur once of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor, The required ~~bonJi and the principal amounts thereof ere set for Ul on page 6 of this a9rewnent, 16. TAe Developer Warrants that the imyrav nuents oast rfDed in this agreement shall De free from def ec [s in ' " me't2r i'a'IS"a nd'iao rkmanihiq. Any and ati portlom of tree imgrov¢- men[s found to be defective wftMn one (l) year following the data on whech the unprovementt are atteDted by the CI[y Shall De repaired or replaced Dy Oevelapzr free of all char 9es to tree City. The Geveloper mall Turn sin a maintenance guar dnte@ security in a sum equal to ten percent (IU%j of the cans [rutteon -3- s ~~ lst imste or t10U.00, whsn haver Is qre atxr, to secure the Ialtnful perfor wance o1 Oeveloper'i Obl sga dons es dzscr sped In this pars- • gra Dh. fhe main[enancx guarantee security shall also secure [De feitMul per/ormance by the Oev glop er of any oDliy anon of use Developer to do sp ec if ied work with res pee[ to any pathway maintenance assessment distr is [. Once the improremen is nave been accepted and a matn[enance guarantee security hei Deen ace ep[eo Dy the Ci[y, the other improvement security describe0 in this dgr cement may be tale eseJ provided Chet sucn release is otherwise lutnDrli2d Dy Cne $u tl liViSlUn hldp pct a0tl any dppl iCa01¢ :sty Ordinan«. ll. That the Developer shall take out an0 maintain Sash public 11dD 11 sty anC Dr oper ty damage uisur an ce as shell protect hsm and any conlractur or su DC Ont roc [or performing work covered by In is agreement from clasini fcr propz rty dameg es which may do S¢ hecause Df th0 nature Of the wars or from Opera[ionf and Or leis agreement, whet her such opera U Ons De by hsmself or by any Contractor or icbcontrac[or, or anyone aired ly or fndiret[ly employztl by said persons, even though such damages De not caused Dy the negligence of the Oevelop<r or any cpn[rac for or subcontractor or anyone employed Dy sasd persons. Tne public lia Dility dnd proDOr ty damagz insuranct snail I~SI the Ci[y as additonal insured and directly Drotztt [he i.ity, Its dtficers, agents and employees, as well as the DtvelaDer, nis con[r act ors and his subcontractors, and all snsurance policies issued nereuneer shall so st dt e, the musimum amounts of such insurance ih all De as follows: p. Contractor's 11aDility insurance providing bodily injury or death if aDiltty isms [s of not less tna 5300,000 for each person and 11,000,000 for each accident or Deco rr ante, an0 property da~nage liaDil- s[y Ifinils of not less than 5100,000 Por each accs- dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of • f2g0,000 far claims which m+y an se tram the opera- tiDns of the Developer in the pert armence of the work Herein provided. D, putom oblle IiaDlli[y Insurance cover ing all vehicles used in the perfonna nee of this egr cement gravid ing bodily indury Laoility lsmits of n0[ less roan 5200,000 far each person and 5700, OUO for each accident or OCC Urren<t, a0d Dr op er ty damage IiaDility limjts of not It ss than 550,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an ag greyate of Hal less loan 5:00,000 wh sun may arise from the oDera- tlons of the Developer ar nis Contractor sn pert or mf ng the cork provided for herein, l8. That Def ore the coccus ion of this agreement, the O eveloper Shall ff le with the City a cxrtif tc ate or cart if is aces of Insurance covering the specif ieo fnsuranc e. Each sucn c art if it ate shall Dear an endorsement Drec lading the cancellations, or reduction in Coverage of any policy evidences Dy Such Ctrt i(Kate, before the expiration Bf lh~rty (70) days after tna hty shall Aave received not sf station Dy registered mall from lox fnsur ones tarn ar. ps evidence of understanding the provsslons contained herein, and a( Intent to comply with tame, thz iundivsder has su bmilte0 the f ollowsng oeicriDtd imp ravemznt sxcun ty, and has alh xed nis signature hereto; -4• • ~~ • Fq liliF UL PEAf ORMAnCE TYDl: Surety Dn nti pal Arno unU $9],000 ' Hame an0 address of surely; HATf RIAL M1HO LAAOR PAYMEnT Type: Surety - Principal Amount: 54fi,000 flame and eddresi a( surety: [A S11 OEP OS IT MOn UNE NTAT IOH Type: Casn Principal Amount: 5 1, P50 Name and address of surety: NAINTf nAHCE GHARAHTEE Type: Principal Amount: Name and edaress of surety: TO 8E POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OY THE CITY IN NITNE SS HEREOF, the yart ies hereto nave caused these presents to De duly a ecuted and acknouledged with all /ormall [ies re Mu tred Dy I w on the dales set /ortn oppostte their signs lures. Dale ( d ; /G.'~ Dy ~ 1 . ,Developer • g e ure I Roy E. Daly. Jr. Pn rated I ~} Ort< /?,L~ Dy ~ ,. ,.. i'1" r ^I "' ~•Dev eloper ~~ 19n store ` Mary Ellen Oa 1Y ~~22 ''l, Pn rated r IGCL( /q, /{! / 2ra0 Ac ceDCed: SHIRLEY ~ . GAGLIANO City oY Rancho Cucamonga, N0T1RY PUBLIC Celifof Old yT.~ nANaAS A Nun l<iDa1 Corporatlon Ml Pppummant Eapaw 3"ly -Q(,. BY: Haydr Attest: ~~y Clerk ,.~ Approved: DEVELO PEA'S SIGMAIVAE MUST DE NOTAIi I2fD -S- J v WGLSI I't^n{VUIY]11 U.1.., CNCNOACIe1tII( PGINII IfL .LII000LC for lmproremenL Iletnosa Ave. 70 ~ 75.59 to 59 ~ 90.10 Oate: 1G=ril-1st corpuled-6y; - .~reilly C.I:. /I, S. Inc~__ file 0.e erence: Cuy Ordw mg Ao. e o NOTE: Ooes Iwt Include current fre for • wrltln9 Dermlt ur Pavement deDOSlts gpANTITY UNIT lTfw PRICE NSW NT l5 L.f. P.C.C. curo - 12" C.F. 24' gutter ].25 lne 75 072.09 L,f. P.C.T;, curo - 0' C.F. 2Y' 9v uer 6.00 2291.'u 94.^A L.f. P.C.[, curo on1Y ;30 5tA ]2 19^_ Lf. A.C. oerm 4.50 Sbt .(Y1 2727.5 S.F. 4• P.C.C. sldadls 1.75 4~?7.3 1] S.F. Orbs approacn 2.50 S,F. 0' P.C.C. cross quit er (Inc, curo) ].40 9.61.1 .A 9.°,0 C.Y. Street e.cavatlon 1.50 1.•fa.00 C.Y. Import<J emoankment 1•S'] 75.675 S.f. Preparation or suo rase 0.15 0.051.28 S.F. Crutned a9g. Dase per Inch [nick) 0,01 TON A.C. (aver 1700 tons) 2J.W TON A.C. (900 to lID0 loot) ]S. LO -5 tT TON A.C. (SW la 500 tons 45.OJ 2A .975.00 . TON A.C. lancer 500 tonsl 60.00 S.F. A.C. (]' trt1cU 0.55 S.f. PatcN d.C. (trencnl 1.75 S f 1" [nick A.C. ov erl aY 0,]0 "--¢- . . fA. AdJutt sewer manna le [0 9reox 250.00 500.00 FA AOJuit sewer clean out to grade 150.00 0 . fA. AdJ utt water vat v<s to grade )5.00 ~ =5- FA. Str<ec llgntt 1~•W o L f Barrl odes (Intertec, 4500 min) 1.W C{4T ~ . . L.F. f S 2 F 4' rlJwood Mader 1.75 Removal o/ A.C. pavement4 F<F Pavuta:nt Lt .a2't.tkt . . . L.f, Removal o/ D.C.C. csro l.]0 I W -- L.i. Removal of A.C. Cerm , 200 W FA. Street 519nf JS OJ '~-- EA. F Reflectors and Dosts Ccncrete LIOCk wall . 25 CU 9 1" rp ,ry;8 . L. S.F. Rcu lntng wall 20 CO 1011 A99rxgate oas! 7 W 425 00 C.Y, Con sate strut [ores 29 W L.f. le" RCP (2 WO O1 • ~- F L 23' RCD (1500 0) ]S.u0 . . f L ]6` RCP 2000 J) 49 00 . . f l 4B• PCP (1200 0) )6.00 . . fA Catcn oasin M 4' 2000.00 ' . [p, Cetnt auto u 8' 2900. CO Cq, latch oasin W 22' 4500.W EA Lout depress ton 4' SOU.CO . FA Local oeprnston l2' ]WO•W . fA Junction structure 5000,00 . EA Ou[let structure, Std 1506 1500. CO . U Wllet s[nc[ure, StJ 1507 5 . EA. Gu drd Dots 40.00 L.F. Guard Danel (wood) 25,W ~- L F Sawcu[ 2.00 t.dm.(n . . FA. Nxadwall (48` wing) 4U00 CO f, L Redwood header ' w/~g~^ . - ~ 5.i.- - L+ndicap ln9q : Irrlgat tan 2 75 ~ L.F, Roll curo (P,C.C.1 7.50 JE !A. Sc. Trx(:3 78.011 nl 'J yl 825.W fq fi fA10 99 lt. .v m:m: 4v. ]lvc+ . . ENGI NEFR ING INSPCC110N fEE SUB TOTPL B;Ln7:1.In • mREST00.ATl ON/OELINEAI ION CASH [OnT InGEnCY COSTS R r.. •.I pfPOSIT lREfpNpARLE) fAlitlFbt PE0.F00.MANCE BOUO (lW }) yp,Im r,n MONUMENTAT ION 5URE1i (CASH) ti•YO. on LA000. AND MATERIAL OONO (50}) d0.irp (p I aNrswnt to CItY of Randlo Cucason9a Mun lclpal Code, Title 1, Chapter l.pd, adoDtlny San &rn+rd lna County Cade Tltlet, Ch4Dlers t-5, ! usN r4stontlon/dellnatlon deposit tM11 G pde prior to lituance of an En9lneerln9~[/onstructlon Per>,I t. Rev lsed 1/B4 7~U .. ..-.. ...-. . L • <. ,: RESOLUTION N0. F02.=06-B2R-~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, ANO FINAL h1RP OF TRACT N0. 11781 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 11781, consisting of 76 Condos, submitted by Daly Construction, Su 6divider, located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 6y the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is . authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted es good and sufficient, su b,lect to approval as to form and content thereof 6y the City Rttorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y Autheiet, City Clerk Jaa K ~~/• J / • u • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 6, 1985 , T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Mubbs, City Engineer 8Y: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician GCG.NO^' ~o ~9 ~i~,,- Iz 2 I~ I9 ~ I SUBJECT: Approval of Bonds, Agreement and Summary Vacation of Tract 12621 located on the south side of Arrow Route between Madrone and Raker Avenues submitted by Richwood Development Company Tract 12621 was approved by Planning Commission on September 12, 1984 for the division of 7.85 acres of land into 93 lots. An Agreement and Bonds have been submitted in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5169,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: E 84,500.00 Letters of approval have been received from the School Districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C .&R.s have been approved by the City Attorney. In addition, a portion of the existing south half of Richwood Drive is being vacated to shorten the cul-de-sac. RECOMMENDATIOX St is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 12621, Bonds and Agreement and Summary Vacation of a portion of Richwood Drive and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and cause said map and vacation to be recorded. LB~ifBK :,jaa Attachments ~U ~~ °,J- 65~sps ~: .. +e+. 1+e f.. ~ F ~ e e C c °Ze cell ~c t. •i .1 .+ Sf .! 'e t5:i ' 61 ]: a c on ', '" . er sr u, uoaY° `HEN ` - n ee• n 1+ . ee ~+..: . n••: se rt . ~i LOT Oel+ol°'u •o- hk 66 o I°: ~. - nLrs n'~ nee ,_u--~:Ir:< ~0t ~ .. z °.. 4 SALINA 5'i'~'I:1° 'ae'i •srv rf as oo ~$' ` - nn•r n's »e° .~A'o~ o I• .. ai. ~. il,°SL'1l te.Gg,i ^~,. R= ___ I,\,ve lr sr "IIe ~?eI. °r rs. rl sr ;.ue,. 'I ~ss. .. ?[?r ~~. "e e.° bj. ;Ur isiau°: r n n yWj ~i 1"ve5 '°"e. ~Irse sm i~li ar ~-' er n~ 1~. z °J _ s~a~ STREETe I / h M1I ruu new n•e N If W. ~ la 1',~II+/! II «s 12 _ .V, .,rr°V~w to ao°0p. j's eer~I a+{< so as i _. w "-- -a~r+ov /' ~ `/$ 13 ^ R 14 ` IS •I 16 ' ` e I ~~~`m tl a »-m I ~~ To ~~ ~.,en ~.-n e. ~ _ LOT eU" rw°e' ~°e •ra no it LOT ~A~ ~ n Ee• fY p"[ 66111' $ ^a~ n e>• a ~r a vu aa' _ ~s RICHWOOD ~-~- -T--- ---- ----- I ----- -----T `-~: I I ctc~go . 3~~ CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAAtONC'A tiNe~ <" A. a Pik ~ ~ ~j ~ Q ENGINEERING DIVISION lm 1 ~ page C CHAFFEY JOINT UNION ...lol__________V_.- ooooo~ .~. o....,,,,: r~cA.~.;;,;, .'~..._,TL.,. January 8, 1981 . I ."vu Hurber of Dwellings: 90 multi facily Within the Chaffey Joint Union Hiah School District attendance boundaries for the following described project: Location/Description: Tract No. 12621 C HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Letter of Certification .,, p~ of School District Cacacity ;,s:,19;;1,'~;ii;Ji~liS~S SW co rr.er of Arrow Rt, and '^ad ro ne Rancho Cucamonga • Anticipated Completion Date: Fall 1986 The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 14 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permi*.s by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall validate such commitment. /~~ `^~_ cc:, Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 5c erintendeM/Asst. Superintendent by Dianne Allen J ~. ~, '7 ~~ ..E . 74 vJ+ Cucamonga School District 8776 ArcniDald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga. California 91730 " Telephone (7141 997b941 noe[flro vsusoo¢ danud ry 11. 1Q86 s.o..,,.e.,l Date LETTER OF CERTIFICATION FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY • 80An0 Of TR VtTELE CAgOI CONFEq W'LLIAM CRA WfOgO GEOYG IA Gfl IFi~.n oAWO HALL JULIAN gINC'JN Within Cutamon9a School District and Cucamonga School District attendance boundaries for the following described project: Location/Description Tract a12621, Southwest corner of Arrow and Number of Dwelling Units 90 Multio L• dwellings Anticipated Completion Date Fall 1981 Gentlemen: The Cucamonga School District hereby certifies that the capacity for 97 students will he provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy F. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocations Board may fund ail school building projects under its current rules and regulations wf thout priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final mep or the issuance of building penni is by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90 day period shall validate suc ommitment. Si ce -1 ~~ L^-~\ r Velasquez ( \ Superintendent cc: Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga RV:vc • f _I a - ~~ NenP•e•Mm, ~,~ ~ ROBERT NEUFELD ` ~~~ ~ ~ S,rete rr. Gewew Mnwunr • CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MICHAEL inn ~ Onrcbv ~~ ~ ' ~ EARLE R ANDERSON BEVERLY E BRAOEN VICTOR A. CHERBA K. JR,. P•nAe el <HA RLEB A WEBT January 23, 198 \ 'A ~ i i City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department ,,.,. ,.~ P. 0. Box 807 _ Rancho Cucamonga, California 9730 Attention: John Martin Gentlemen: Richwood Development Company, Developer of Tract No. 12621, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, has deposited with this District • a Material and Labor Bond, a Fai~_hful Performance Bond, and a Utilities Improvement Agreement far waterline and sewerline construction. These bonds and agreements are being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. Presently, the sewer and water improvement plans have not been approved. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, CUCP.MONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ~) ~~, ~~ ~7< ~~;~~ Betty Fien Secretary • b ~~ ~=~~~ ~s~d~s 0^n CITY OF Rp NLHD CO[pMONG0. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FO0. TRACT X0. 12621 KNOH ALL MEN BY THESE PRESE3TS: That [his agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the apPticable Ordi r.ances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, C allforni a, a municipal torpor ation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred tO as the City, and Ric MOOd Development Cam pony hereinafter referred to as the 7ev¢7 oiler. HI TNESSE T'd: THAT, HHE RE A6, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as ih own on the conditionally approved subdivision known as tract No. 12621; ana HHEAEAS, said City has est ablizhed certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located on the south side at Arrow between Madrone and Baker. NON, THEREFORE, It is hereby agreed by said City and by said Oev eloper as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at De velo0er's expense ail improvements described on Page 6 here-of. wt ehin twelve mon ins from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement sh al' be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said Cf ty approving this ag reemen [. This agreement shall be in default On the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of satd aDDr ov ai unless an exten- sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request Shall be su0mitt ed t0 the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shalt contain a statement Of circum St an ces necessitating the extension of Cime. the City shall have the right to review the pravl lions of this agreement, Including the construction standards, co it estimate, and im Drovement secure ty, a r.d to require add ustmen is therein if any substantial change has Occurred duN ng She term hereof. 4. I/ the Developer (ails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions t0 be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Oevel Oiler and/Or his surety the full cost and expense incurred. B. The Developer ih die provide metered eater Service [0 each fat of said develOpm ent in accord ace with the regulations, schedules, and fees Of the Cucamonga County Hater District. 6, Th¢ Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component Of any irrigation water system in contilct with constructs on Of required Improvements [o the sa [i sf action of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. • -1 i.7~~. (c ). impro veaents ropuirPd t0 be cpnslrect ed shall co nfore to the Stan lard Drawings antl Standard Spectfica:i ens Of the r: ty, And [p the improvement it an approve] by and On file iv the office Of the City Engineer, ;aid ,mprpvemen[s are tabulated an the Con structivn and fiord Estimate, hereby incorporated On page b hereof, as taken frog the improvement plans listed [hereon by number, Tne Developer snail also be responsi Sle for constrvc- tip0 of any transitions pr Otn er incise ntal work be yD ad the tri¢[ boundaries as neetled for safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or Ommi scions discovered during constructin shall be cor reC tee upon the dir_ction of ;he City Engine^~. AeVisBd wa r'a due td said plan and ificatfons shall be covered by Lhe provisions of :His agreement and secured by the surety cpveriny the original planned works. 3. Cvnstrvctivn permits shall he obtained by the Developer from the office Of [M1e Lity Eng'neer pr;ar to start of work; all regvl ations listed thereon shall be observed, with atte+tivn given to safety procedures, Control of dust, noise, ar Other nuisance to the ar¢a, and tp proper n0tif ica[ion of public uti li[.es and Li ty Departments. Failure to romply ai:n this Section shall b¢ su bj eCt to ChP p¢nal tl¢5 proVldetl th Cf of pr. 9. The Developer shall be rospo r.s ible far removal of all loose racks an0 other debris from public rights-Of-way within or adjoining said Development resulting tram work r¢letive to said de velOpm en t. to, pork done w, thin existing ;[reels shall be diligently pursued to ¢Ompleti0n; [he Lity shall nave the right tv comDlete any and all work in the event of dnj uslilied delay in comp le[i0n, an0 to recover all nst snd expense incarred from the Developer and/ar his cantr ac for Jy any lawf ui means. ll. Said Je veioper sh :`1 at all times fol'.owing dedica- tion O£ [he etree [s and ea5emen ;s in said subidivi<ion, up tp the cOmpleti pn and acceptance of said work or im DrOVement by said City Council, give goad and ode G..ate warning [o the tr aveiing puh11C of each and every ddngPrp US condition 8xiste n[ in said street or easement, and will protect the traveling Oub 71c from such def ec[1v¢ Or dangerous conditions. Dntil [he completion of all improvements, Herein incOrpOr ated on Page 6 to be performed. each of said styee is no[ accep[¢d as improvements shall be upd er the charge of said Developer $aitl Developer may clos¢ ail or a portion of any street subject [p the tonal [loos contained in a temporary street closure permit, izzuetl Oy [he Ci[y Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the public during the construction of [he improvemen [s herein agreed LO be made. 32. Parkway trees reguired to be planted snail be planted by the Developer after other imps vement work, grading and cleanup nay been completetl. Planting shat) be don¢ at prOVieed Ey ordinance In accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Development Director. The De veioper shall be responsible far maintaining all trees planted in good health until the end of the guaranteed main[ en an ce perioA, ar for One y¢ar after planting, which¢ver 15 1 ater. 1J. the Developer is re spo nsibte tar meeting all condi- ti0nt es[abiished by the Lity pursuant to th¢ $ubdf vision Mao -2- Act, City Grdian ce s, and this agreement for the de velpp n.ent, and for the maintenance of alt improvements cons VUC[ed [hereunder until the improvement is accepted for mat n!enan Ce by Che City, and np-ImpYeVem¢nC seC1Y1 Cy pfpVltled ner elnwl th Shall De released before Such acceptance unless otherwise provided antl au:hgrixed by the City Council of [he Lity. 14. Tnis agreement snail not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has Deen released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required improvement security has been suDmi tied to the City by a successor to the herein nametl, and by resolution of the City Council same nos been accepted, and this ogre em en! and [he improvement security therefor has been releases. 15. Tne improvement security to De furnished by [he Oe veloper with Chis agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptable Dy the City A[[orney: To Secure faithful pert orm ante of this a5reemen t. t. A Dond or bonds by one or more duly aa[horized corporate sureties in ine form one content sDecif fed by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money dr negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies. To secure laborers antl materialmen: 1. A Dond or bands by one or more duly out harized corporate sure ties in the farm and con ten specifies by Lavernment Code Sec(iDn 66199.1. 2. An lmprpv eme-r. Security Instrument in the form and content ;pecif fed by (he City Attorney. 3. A dep02~t with City of money or negotiable Opnds of the '<, nd aDprpved for ser uri r.v A cash deposit ~. ~[h the city to guaranies payment by the Leveloper to the engineer ar surveyor whose certificate appears upon [he F~ .l Nab for the setting of alt bD and ar y, lo[ corner, aim c4 .et centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline fie notes So the City. The amount of ine deposit may De any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no value is su omitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond Ettimate contained herein. Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proce- dure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes ana written assurance at payment in full from the engineer or surveyor. The required bonds and the Drincipal amounts thereof are set forth un page 6 of this agreement. 16. The Oeve toper warrants that the improvements de scri Ded in this agreement ihaii De free from defects 1n mater) als anA workman shf p. Any and all pD rtions of the improve- ments found to be defective within one (I) year follow tog [he des to on which the improvements are accepted Dy the City shall De repaired or replaced by Gevelop er free of all cnargef tq the City. The Developer shalt furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equai to ten percent (10:) df the construction r 1 L J -3- estimate or $200.00, whiche v¢r is Greater, to secure the fat thf vl performance of Developer's obliga[;ans as described in this para- graph. The maintenance guarantee sebari :y sha!1 ai;o secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Oevel oper [o do Specified wor'a with respect to any parew ay maintenance assessment district. On c¢ the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guar an Ceti sec prity Dd$ Seen aC C¢ptetl by the Li Ty, the oth¢r imprpv¢me of se Girt ty described in Cnis agreement may Se releasdd prpvid¢d Chat such release is tithe rwise authorised by the $ubdi Ji sion Map AcC and any appl icaole =i :y Ordinance. 17. That the Developer shall :xae out and naintain such puD1iC liability and property dam ag@ ins dr ante as shall protect him and any contr ac [or or subcontr zctpr pert arm inq wort covered by Cnis agreement from claims for property damages whicn :nay arise because pf the nature of the work nr fron operations antler this agreement, whether Such operations he by himself or by any contractor or subcpn tr actor, anyone directly Dr indirectly employed Dy said persons, eventhough such damages Se not caused Dy the negligence of the Developer or any contractor ar subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The pub tic liability and property damage insurance shall list the Lity as adds tonal insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as welt as the Oxvel oper, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issue0 hereunder shall se state. The minimum amounts of such insurance shah be as fatiows: A. Contractor's lia^`i'[y insurance providing hotlily • injury or deaM .iapili(y limits of not less tha 5300,000 far eat^~ person and 51,000,000 for each act lde of or occurrent=, and property damage liabil- ity limi [s of no[ less than 3100,000 for each acci- dent or pccurre^ce with an aggr¢ga to limit of f250,000 for c7a'nS which may arise from the oDera- fions of the Developer in the performance of [he work herein provided. 8. Putomobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance pf this agreement providing bodily fnjury liability limits of not less than 5200,000 for each person and 5300,000 for ea<n accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of no[ less than 550,000 for each acciCent or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than 5100,000 which may arise from [he opera- tions of the Oevetoper or his Lontr ac tar in pe rlarm my the Bork provided for herein. t8. Thai before the execution of this agreement, the Oev eloper shall fife with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance. Each such c@rtifi care shall Dear an endorsement precluding the can cell aliens, or reduc [ton in coverage of any policy evidences by such certificate, before the expi rattan o/ thirty (]OJ days after the City shall have received na [ificatlDn by registered matt from the insurance carrier. As evidence of underst finding the Drovi signs contained herein, and of intent to ccmDly with same, the Subdivider haz submi tt ¢d the following described improvement security, and has affixed his Si gOdture hQ ret O: _4. I. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE type: Bond principal Amount: 5169.000.00 Name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT 7 ypl; Bpntl Principal Amount: 534,500.00 Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MO NU MEXTAT[ON Type: Cash 9ond Principal Amoun[: 55,100.00 Yame and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Princi Pal Amaun t: Name and address of surety TO 8E POS TEO PRIOR TO ALOE PTAXLE BY THE CITY LY NIiNE SS MERE OF, the parties hereto have causetl Ihese• pres en[s to be duly execu :?d and ackna wiedyed with all fOrTdli Lies required by Idrr On :he dates Set fOf [11 Opp'J'sl [e Lhlfr Signatures. Oate Dy .Develope+ n Oa[e by ,Developer ign azure Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, C alffornfa A Municipal Cor por atipn By: Maypr Attest: Approved: OEVELOPEA'S SIGNATUpE MUST eE NOTARI2E0 • -5- ~l • RESOLUTION PIO. {92-A6-95R -' - ~ i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT ND. 12621 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12621, consisting of 93 lots, submitted by Richwood Development, Subdivider, located on the south side of Arrow between Madrone and Baker Avenues has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with goad and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is • authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and 5uff icien t, subject Lo approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authe et, City C er jaa ~J~ RESOLUTION N0. E02='OG-'1'SRY~ ~ ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUFiMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF q PORTION OF RICHWOOD DRIVE WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and HSghway Code, the Lity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City Street hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence suhmitt ed that a portion of Richwood Drive is unnecessary for present or prospective pubi is street purposes because it has been superceded by relocation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by Lhe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating that portion of street on Map V-042 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal tlescri pt ion which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made apart thereof. • SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said portion of Richwood Drive no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, RPPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon O. IAikels, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authe et, City C, erk Sao ~~ EXHIBIT "q" • Beginning at a point on the Northerly line of Tract 9658 as per map recorded in Book 165, Pages 83 thru 86 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California, distant thereon 420.21 feet West of centerline of Mad rone Avenue, said point being the most Northwester ly corner of Lot 5 of said Tract, thence North 89°55'15"East 20.19 feet to the 6eginn ing of a non-tangent curve, concave Northeasterly, with a radial bearing of North 89° 55'15"East and having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 90°00'00" an arc length of 78.54 feet; thence North 89°55'15"East 0.52 feet to the beginning of anon-tangent curve, concave Northeasterly with a radial bearing of North 00°04'45" West and having a radius of 75.00 feet; thence Westerly along said curve through a central angle of 70°31'46" an arc length of 9[.32 feet to the point of beginning. Said parcel contains 0.01351 acres. u • i~ • C to B~ lp ; _ _i `~ °~ ~ °~rr= .. 63 , r » o. ~ Ism . u e aX^ ~ fi4 oRl R °I ~~ nHiuf : seer u e Z an _ i .O = 65 ^el ..N aoa p ~ per st Ire » ~ `ti h 66 a ~ I . s ~ e. n.».rr »m. - s= RU_Up i IR- s r. sn. s]o' ~.y: ' .. M. ee ,tits cieN LOT ' '>'aa o0 .An H if' e .. RICHWOOD ---r-------~--------~-------T - ~ ~ i ~.. i ~ ~ 3 E 7(H I B I T "A" r7 ~ >,°~ » a n»•s+ar~ ~ ~~ ' nn w vo , Noa u[o aop ses ma ' "' rs. - n n• ss n'e » Ne T n. .R x LOT ..~~~me. en] o~ "]ro .,_ R - nar sus', »ee' Re ^-_n, F ] 1. I Y R,"~ N'I l W 1 \ e II.R rte t] . nn n ~ yin vn n~+n w srnnrn w C~ STAFF REPORT DATE: February 6, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager /I/1 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer/ +, SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice d, fom let ion ~~-- ~~ -p 9 N ~~7 A _ IZ ., '> I9%7 Parcel Map 6051 - located on Burlwood at Manzanita DEVELOPER: Nelson Construction 6937 Mesada Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Reduction in Improvement Security: b13,600 • The road improvements for Parcel Map 6051 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that Council accept the improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and authorize the reduction of the Improvement Security Instrument (releasing 513,600 and retaining 56,800). The 56,800 will be held for six months to guarantee Labor and Materials. LBH:bc 7~ RECORDING AEOUESTEO BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Bo. BO] Rancho Cuc amgnga, California 91730 NMEN RECOR OEO MAIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMJNW P. 0. Bax 807 Rancho Cucamonga. California 91730 N Oi ICE OF COMPLETION NOi ICE I$ HEREBY GIVER THAT: 1. the undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter desert bed real property, the nature of which interest ar estate i5: NELSON CONSTRUCTION 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF MNLHO CUCAMIINW, 9320-[ Base line Rgad, P. 0. Bos 80), Rancho Cuc amvnga, California 91730. 7. On the 6th day o/ Febro ary, 1985, there was completed on the • hereinafter described real Droperty tae work of improvement set forth in the contract documen [s far: PARCEL '^AP 6051 a. The name of the original cantr attar Por the work of improvement d5 d wh012 wd 5: NELSON LOHSTq UCTION 5. The real property rpterred [o her efn is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Co~n[y of $an Bernardino, California, and is described as fOIIOXS: PARCEL NtAP 6051 CITY OF RANCHO N[AMONGA, a municipal corporatl on, Owner Oa[e L pyd Xu6 s, y ng neer • C1 ~ J - RESOLUTION N0. ~~E82-Bft=i41f _ - i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 6051 ANO AUTHORIZING 7HE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE: WHEREAS, the construction of puhl is improvements for Parcel Map 6051 have been completetl to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is fiereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: don O, i4ike s, Mayor ATTEST: every A. Authel et, City C erk jaa 'G • STAFF REPORT vA DATE: February 6, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kroll, Engineering Technician O C~u.Sipt, ~~~~i ~7. s ' :~ r -_ lu'C . SUBJECT: Approval of Bonds and Agreement for CUP 83-22 located on the southeast corner of Helms and Hampshire Streets submitted by Allsize Rancho Cucamonga and release of previously submitted 9onds and Agreement submitted by Blanco Security Storage, Ltd. CUP 83-22 was approved by Planning Commission on gpril 26, 1984 for the construction of a mini warehouse. Allsize Rancho fuc amonga has submitted the attached Bonds and Agreement to guarantee construction of street improvements on Helms and Hampshire Street in connection with this project. Bonds in the following amounts have been submitted; Faithful Performance Bond: 532,000.00 labor and Material Bond: E16,000.00 in addition, Blanco Security Storage, Ltd. is requesting that the Bonds and Agreement previously submitted for this project be released. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution approving said Bcnds and Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. It is also recommended that the previously accepted Bonds and agreement submitted by Blanco Security Storage, Ltd, be released. Resp~tfully submitted, ~ f / ~~~ ~~~Z~ LBH: Bx Jj as Attachment j~ r/ ~~ I ~ I, :. ,. .~ ~~~J_n •_ _A rF A. .F ~ .. ~' ~1 ~PIn ~L., t'~ , ~_~ ..~ ~~ ~ ..rn•Ft ` L ...----- ' ~i}pi i .._._... ~~ 1~ ' r ~ ~~ iy 5/;W ^ 11 IL ~ •. ~ 1 I h j ~I I \ r, (1,'~~I It N r ~f`Il .. I n.. ^• Yl 11`:,Jy ,y XIMPS••AF OSl '~'z' ~~Y~J-~ t 1 i ~ y+ddd~~ ,+.•^^' ~ I~ntct "S j1~I '~ r_ _ z 3 .« it ~• •" 7. ACT.iL., ,: Nd_ _~_\`.fJq[1;f 11 ~~~ ~// ~.~r ~,^ CITY OF RAtiCHO ClCA1~10\GA «fPB3~iZ_ /` ~ $ G Fj {.~ ~' V6~ EN INEHRING DIVISION w T \ I VICINITY MAP 1 ~I ` PaFz • ~ CITY OF RP NCND CUCA MONGA IMPROVEMENT RGAEE MEHi FOR [UP 87-22 KY D'd ALL MEV 7Y THESE PRE <ESiS: 'hat this ogre?Ten: is mdCe and en[oretl lntJ, n CJnf pr^1n Ce 'xi[h the pYpVts~pns Of ihp Municipa'. :ode and Aegu~l itions of City of Pan the Cat arzonga, State of Ca:i/ornf a, a municipal corporation, Ferein of Lr referred :o as the Li ty, one Alisi ze gauche OK anion ga; A Senpral p~rtnersh~p herpinaPT er referred :p as the Develape~. TNAT, 'eH EpEd$, said 7eveloper tlesires tc develop ce rtair redl prcperty in Shcd Llty 1nC 3t ed On the SO UtnedSL GOrn2r Of Net mS dnd Nam "v S F,ir? $:r2e t5: dnd NNEgEnS, sold Li ty has established ter tarn requ".r?menu [c be met by said Deve igper as prerequisite Co gr an H ng cf final dpproVdi; dnC NOA. TMEREFLRE, it is hereby agreed Sy and Se txeen the City and Che Beveloper as follows: 1. The Oe velgper hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all improvements described on page a hereof within twelve months from the date hereof, 2. this agreement shall be effective on the dot? of the resell u[ion of [he Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall he in def aul[ on the day follow- . fug the first anniversary date cf said apprpvai unless an exten- sion of time has been gran Ted by Said Lity as hereinafter provid- ed. 3. The Ceveloper maY request atlditional tf me in which to Complete the provisicns of this agreement, in writing nd[ less than 30 days prior to the def au:t date, and including a statement of circumstances of ne cessi [y for adds tien at time. In considera- fien of such request, the Li ty reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cast estimate, and sufficiency of the irprovemen; security, and tq regJife dd]ustmen is thCretp whEn warrdn [eel by SJhstantidl Ch dOgei therein. 4. I/ the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the prgvisions of thfs agreement, the City shall nave the right at any time to Cause said provisions to be rumple [e0 by any lae- ful means, and thereupon [o recpv er /rpm said Developer and/or his Surety the full cast and expense incurred In so doing. 5. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Devel- oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work wf thin the public right-of-way, and the developer shall conduct such work in full cgmplian ce with Me re 9ulat ions contained [herein. Non-compliance may rezu It in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public right-of-way Improvement work required shall be constructed in conform ante with app•oved Improvement plans, Standard Spec llication s, and Standard Drawings and any special / J amendments thereto. ton str uc[ipn shall include any transitions and/or p[h er loci den; dl wprk deemed necessary far pr ainape or public safely. Errors ar ommi scions discovered dun ng construc- tion shall be carrectetl upon [he d~rec[ton of :he Cfty Eng ineCY. aeV152d anYk d'Je t0 sdltl pl do m0difi Ci LiOCS shdll be cpv eyed by Lhe pravisipns of this agreenev and secured by the surety covering the pn ginal planned worts. ]. Bork done 'xithin eel sting siree [s 5'na Pi be diligent- ly pu rsved to cane ieHoh; the Ci[y s4 a:l have 'he right b complete any and ell work in the event of anju Y.ifted delay in coup'e[ion, antl to •ecov er atl cast and e*Pense '~nc:rretl from the Developer and/or his contractor by any lawful means. fi. the Developer shall be responsi0 ie far replacement, relpcattpn s, or re"oval of any component of any irr ;a;'pn wat e~ sys tom in conflict xiLh the re paired work to the sat~sftction of the Ci Cy En g~,neer and [he awn er of the cater system. 9. the Developer shall be responsible for rerov al o/ all loose rock and other debris fron Che public right-pf-way. 10. The Developer shall plant and saint sin parkway trees as directed by the Cpmmunity Development airectpr. II. the improvement socuri ty to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject [o the apPr oval of [he City Ai±orney. the prin- cipal amount of said im pravement security shall not be less than the amount sho an: L • Cs• c J FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Tyoe: ~rur,Dai ,r. ,,. ~.. 53:......~ Name ae d. address of sura ty; CaDltal Bond 6 Insurance CO. S Neal A1tt 9ond1 n0 NATE R1b~CDA~10 ICaAB~ka• ;113, nnaheim, LA 32dGS Typo urines... ,-.~,.. i::,:7A..- Na°.e and address o/ s.re cy: Sane as Above CASH DEPOSIT MO NUMEMTATION rpe. N a-.^ and address cf surety: TO BE POSTED PRI00. TO ALCE PTPNCE BY THE CITY I4 'd1T NESS HEdEDF, the par;ies he roto have eause. these presents to be Cu it' eaecu[eC and ac'Xn o'n'. =_Cge itp 'Il `a"a'i;`es requiretl Sy laW on [he d ~%J~,( s/,e/J'~,/, /.`o ~h ^ppos,t ^„ir si3r a;ur~s. Date;2/23/'x- byar/~-~ ,,...,~~' '3evela:er OaL== by Y Ceve'ogar Accepted: 4:/'Cp~^~ --~ Litt' o` Rancho Cdc a.rn7l, Cali`prq'a A Municipal Lor porat'D~ By: Mayor A toes[: tty L /e/r/~k~ ~ ADproved:~~/~~~ /',~ (S ty ~i'o rney - January J. 19d5 ~ Gary ;, " Fenne th !{. Crurc,e ^ p race ~p, Socdan, BaFelo, John ,y. Brews car and Peer i .. -rine " • +,• i,ll Size Ra ncho~ o CO ,, e , Yp Ofi ICIAL Sf ML Q ~ DLEYA D. KrEV; ATT ' nga e m < By nou ~aaup .L gems ~~ YM nneaL arncc in ,ner - ..e, o. w.e. .m.,~. . n .. „i ,c ~ ~~ F OPI N frE 40V NiY MI COMNRpMr aOYNyTpn Q WrtHFSS my n•ne /n on,n,auen F y~~ ~ OLETA p, KIEWATT _ / r'~••~e•rm ruoarnau,..~u•n CIiY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGII ENBIXEERIN6 DIY[SiON ENC0.0ACNNFNT PEANIT fEE SCFIEOIILF • FOr (AIprOVIII<n4^. soCCFRazt COC. er a! :.3 ih='3 3^.d ~L^s St e_Oa Dille: ~_:-'-36 lOntpOteO Oy; _-~3^. aT:3~~ + .i~CC. File Ae erence: City Oran ng o.~~ NOTE: Dols rot include current fee for M tang Perwit or Paveaent deposici QUANT I'v ON•r -' P9:CE ^CY- :9i '= d~_ '^5 q 3l B^ L_ 3 4CG 3fi L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. S. F. S. F. $. F. C.Y. C.Y. S. F. S. F. 70n TON TOY i0N S. F. S.F. S. F. EA. EA. EA. Ea. L.F. L.F. $. F. LF, L.F. EA. EA. L.F. S. F. TON C.Y. L.f. L.F, L.F. L.F. EA. EA. EA. EA. EA. EA. EA, EA. EA, L.F, L.f. EA. L.F. S, F. L,F, ~. p. C.:. curb - :2" C. F. 24^ gutter P.C.C. Garb - 9" C.F. 26^ gutter P.C.C. curb on!y T.C. bertl 6' P, L.L. si tlevalk On ve aoprb acn D" ?. C.-. crass gutter tint, curb) $tr s.t 2aC dV dt 100 ImporteC embanxmen[ Prepdrat~m of subgraoe Cr as netl a9g: oase (per inch tnici) A.C. (over .300 [bnsl A.^.. ;900 to 1700 tons) A,C. ;500 to 900 tans) A.C. (under 500 cons) A.L. (3" [hick) P dt cn A.C. (tro0th) 1" thick d.C. overlay adjust sever manhole to gr ad< gdjo st sever clean out to grace Aa; ust .stet valves w grade S[^^et lights Darn cads pint <rsec. Si00 mrn 2 x Y' redvalo neater Aembvi! bf q,L. pavo*ent Remav al of p,C.C. n:c A¢movil Of A.C. berm Street signs Reflectors and Oasis Cbnc cte block vall Retaining vali qgg re gate base Concrete struc:+res 1B" ACP j2000 01 26" ALP ;1SC0 71 36" 4CP (2000 7i ae" vLP (I2pp Di Cat cn basin A S' Catch basin 'A • X' Cat cn basin N • 22' Lbcai Cepression 4' Local depression l2' Junction structure Out le[ Structure, Std 1506 •~d. put let structure, Std 1507 Guars posts Guard panel (vbpd) Savcut NeaCvall (/8" vingJ Retlvobd header Lantli<aping 6 irrigation 0.011 cure (P. C. C.1 St: vet Trees 7.25 5.00 S -_ 5.50 0.50 1.75 ~ -` 3rpO .=J - - 7.aD 1.50 7.50 0.i5 - 27.00 75.70 4i. CO 60.00 5 5.360 0.55 1.75 0.30 bSO:k70 c".L: 5 I SO. JO .i5c0IX ;~.:; s :;~ 1.00 1.75 7.70 :. v0 2CL'0 T..70 25.70 2L.OC 7.G0 62' 29. i0 75 J0 J?. CO i5.70 20L0.'JO 2900.70 6500.00 500,00 1000.00 5000.00 2.500 5 [~•,] SG0.00 40.00 25.00 2.00 ~•~ - 4000.00 1.75 2.75 7.50 lOJ.00 5 1.500 ENGINEER ING (NSPFCT ION FEE 51, i55 SUB TOTAL •AE5T00.ATION/OEL INEAiiON LASX st mb CONTINGENCY COSTS DEPOSIT (REFUXOABLE) fAITMFUI PERFO0.MANCE BONG (100%) MONUMFXIATION SURETY (CASH) ^ia UA00. ANO NATEAIK BONG (50%) 15,J00 KXrtulnt tl CitY of XlecNo Cuc4aXwgl NYnleepll Cldt, T1tle I, CMpter 1.0N, ldeptlAE SlN Nrnudlnp CwA[Y Cah Tltln, Chapters 1•S, l usN nstmltlan/dXltneltlen dsposlt sMll M ttede prt/r tX lssuenee M en EngineerlA9 Conttructlpn Ienit. A.Nited B/ee "d -4- .'~ - •;, • RESOLUTION N0. F0~04-B3T(- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEh1ENT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 83-22 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on February 6, 1985, by Allsize Rancho Cucamonga as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southeast corner of Helms and Hampshire Streets; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, CUP 83-22; and 'WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said • Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPT"e0 this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaw J CITY OF RAtiCHO CL'CA~IONGA ~cc+,uoy STAFF REPORT ~? ;. z, ~ _ A~~~ l~l> _ _~ > DATE: February 6, 1985 ~°~- T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 3. Hubbs, City Engineer 8Y: Barbara Kroll, Engineering Technician S UBOECT: Acceptance of Offer of Dedication for Street Purposes, offered as London Avenue (30 feet wide) a north/south street located east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Lemon Avenue • The developer of Tract No. 12523 located on the northeast corner of Lemon and London Avenues, has requested the City accept the dedication of London Avenue as offered on an Easement Deed recorded in the County of San Bernardino on August 3, 1973 in order to construct a portion of the street. A portion of London Avenue from the centerline of London Avenue west will be paved along with the full street improvements on the east half of the street for the development of Tract No. 12523. This will allow for better two-way traffic flow. RECOMAENOATION It is recommended that City Council adapt the attached resolution accepting the 30-foot Offer to Dedicate on London Avenue and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and cause same to record. R esp ctfully s~ LBH K:jaa Attachments . `` TENTATIVE M. ~ ~~ TRACT 12523 ~_ ~~., .~.. . , _....___.__.,.. ~ ..,e. ~.. ~4 t -- ,: ~ ,-r - ~ -- . -,-tA. _~o FI J I l .PV ll. ~. xM! J1Ull • ~IIM ~ ~ to I ~ „ ., . ' .5 • D E R B I S H G U ERR A & A S S O C I A T E S I N C. • CIVIL ENCIN EERS LA90 PL.{N8FR5 Iii EAST "F" STREET. SUITE 13 • ONTARIO, CA LIFORNI.{ 91 )6J )N 9!]-0)l0 )H ~ 9!]~3 )l9 January 9, 1955 Ci [y of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Tract 12523 Att: Lloyd Hubbs - City Engineer Lloyd, • This letter is [o formally request acceptance 'cy the City of the exist- ting offer of dedication for the wesC half of London between Lemon and Liberty in conjunction with the above noted projecC. Please do not hesitate Co contact me, should you have any questions of comments, Yours very tru~jlLy/, D niel E~ erra DER33ISH, CCERRA 6 ASSO RTES, INC. DEC: hb ~~ RESOLUT tON N0.-E02=06=Q7R' ~ ~ " A RESOL UTI OPI OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFORNIR, ACCEPTING A 30-FOOT OE OICATiON ON LONDON AV EtiUE AS OFFERED FOR HIGHWAY AtJO ROAD PURPOSES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The offer to dedicate to the Ccunty of San Bernardino, State of California, the property herein described for Highway and Road purposes, is hereby accepted. Said property is described as follows: Thcse portions of the easement as offered to dedicate to the County of San Bernardino per easement deed as recorded in Bock 8239, Page 744, Official Records of said County, being a portion of Lot 29, Foothili Frostiess fruit Company Tract No. 2, as per map recorded in Book 20 of Maps 7, Page 34, records of said County. E%CEPTING, therefrom Parcel No. 1 (Liberty Street) as described in said easement deed. Section 2: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this resolution to be filed for record in the office of the • County Recortler of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. PASS"e D, APPR04 ED, and ADOPTED this oth day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES ABSENT: don D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa 4~ • • - CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA;VIONGA G~cn.trpH STAFF REPORT o c ~` 9 ~, , 1~ zq ~ 1 I > ' DATE: February 6, 1985 i9__ T0: City Cou ncil and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kr all, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Subordination Agreement submitted ny Fred Janz for his property located at 9942 Almond Street In order to secure financing for his project, Fred Janz has requested approval of a Subordination Agreement to subordinate a lien agreement in favor of the lender. This lien agreement for the future construction of street improvements along the frontage of 9942 Almond Street was approved by City Council on October 17, 1984. RECOIMERDRTIOR It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and accept the Subordination Agreement and cause same to be recorded. Respectfully submitt d, LBH:B~; as Attachment ~. CSu by r:.g~t • SD BOq DIN~TION 116gEEMENT NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREENEVT RESULTS IN YO'JA SEC UAITY I YTEAEST IN TxE vR OVER TY 9^cC DNIVG SUB:ECT i0 AND LOUEB PR.D0.ITY i HAN THE LIEN OF SOME OiH EA O4 LA7EA SEE'JA[TY LY SCAUMENi. ?HIS AGREE°EYi, mace this 4_d ay of ~[ay~~ ,19 -, by Fte1 P. suxna '. owner of :n? 13no neroinaf'.e• de scr :bed and nerelna ter referred to ds "Owne•" and the Ei [y of Aancho Cucamonga heroin of ter ref erreE to as "Cf ty", owner and holder of [he certain Real Property and .Ten Agreemen: hereinafter referred tp as "Lien Agreement". YITNESSETH ==l ~ RrW Q~tg s Ye hec:ca--~ ut$ ~aC $i. ~::. }t'-/ THAT NNEREAS, ~a ~"tsr: dR®'e=• dated -~Trr:~`-"R ~,n3 coven ng: 99:2 ALvu' Ste!, ~CC':.a~a®. ?sHl: lL[xl 1 M F~~= ^m :3c'l, as P= P'a, _ :x' N hZl' :T Cf .,T[@: ~. ~ ~. ~¢t#'S '.v`n $'~l. ~VO ".3l'Sy to secure Rut ~Y1^POVSam¢arl :Tel at~ert. which was retarded x77$'94 iIa29FLrr181 In the off fc lal Aem rds of said County; an0 gMEREAS, owner has executed a deed pf trust and note in the sum o f 'Yie rta~ ar3 seam; seep ~Jnrual, six nad'a' bil'us atl z; :0^ data .:aaur~; ~~ pD5 to aver of • ~aziY vy:'.: ae.^.m wed :~ H e re i n a f [ e • re erred [o as "Lender", pay ab :e nfth .n serest and upon the tens and cond,;ions deu rihed fhe•^~^ whim deed of tru s[ is to be recdraed can ca rrently herewith; and N HEAEBS, it fs a cond, Lipn pre;edent td mdk irg said loan fM1it s did need Of [r USC ldsC dh OV_ 'Q9[1nnQd shrill Jnennd :(Ondl ly be anE f2mdln it 311 L1mQ5 d lien pr Chd•ge UpU9 Lhe Idnd nereinbefore Ee scribed, pn or and supericr to the lf_n or charge of the Lien Agreement; and NYEAEAS, Leader is wtl ling [c mdiQ sdid loan prpvi ded [he deed pf trust securing CM1e same is a li¢n or charge dpon the above descn bed property prior to superior to He lien or cn arpe of [ne Lien Agreement and provided [hat City w,Il specifically and uncondi Clonally Subordinate the lien or charge of the Uen Agreement to Me Iten or charge of Che deed of trust in favor o£ Lender; and gHEAE AS, it is the mutual benef ii pf [he parties hereto that Lender modify said loan to Owner; and City is willing that the deed of trust securing the same shall con stitut a lien or charge upon said land which is unconditionally prior to superior io the lien or charge on ene Lien Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in con5tderation of the mutual benefits ac cur ing tp [he parties hereto anE c['m valuable consideratipr., toe f eCQlpt dnd Stiff iciQnCy pf wM1iCh CpnS~Eofdti pn is hereby acknowledgetl, and in order to induce Lender [o modify the loan above referretl tp, IC is herby declared, under z[eod and agreed as follows: (I) ih at saiA deed of trust securing said note in favor of lender and any renewals or est enslons [Hereof, ahd1l un rondi [tonally be and remain at all times described a lien ar charge on the pr prior and superior to the operty therein lien or charge of [he Lien Agreement. `.: r C ~ (2} iha[ lender would not make i a loan above descr ibex without [his subordination agreement. (3) That this agreement shall be the whole and only agr<¢men[ with regard to the sub0 rdnation pf [he ' lien or charge pf the Lien Agreement tp the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to and shall supersede and cancel, but only insofar as would effort the priority between ibe deed Of trust and Lien Agreement any prior agreements ds to such subardinati on including, but not limited to, these prpv~sion 5, if any, contained in She Lien Agreement which provide for the subordination of the Iien dr charge thereof t0 another deed pr deeds Of [ru it or to another ma rtg age or morcg ages. the City decia res, agrees antl acknowledges that: (d) He consents to and approves all prOVis ions o1 the note and deed of trust in favor of ',ender above referred tp by that certain and if is ation agree Went by and between Owner and Lender, dated , ~, (b) Ne intentionally and unconditionally Naives, relinquishes and subordinates the lien or charge of the Li¢n qg reement in fav Or of the lien or charge upon saie lane of the deed of [rust in favor of Lender above referred to and understands that in reliance upon, one in cpnsfeeratf on of this weiver, relinquishment and Bubo rein a[ipn • specific loans and advances are being one will be made dnd as a part ar] parcel thereof, spec ~fic monetary and other ¢bl ~gations are being and wi!I b2 en[2red 19[0 N11i Ch d00Id n0[ be 0dd2 Or en [ef ed into bv[ for said ~liance open this wa [ver, relinquishment and Bubo^dina[io n; and (C) An Qp dpr52menC hds h2en pl3<2d YpOn the Lien Agreement [hat said Lien Agreement has by [his instrument Seen subordinated to Me lion or charge Of Che deed Of (rOSt in (dvOf Of LeOd?r dbJle referred to. NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CON7A;YS A PROVISION 'NHICH ALL095 THE PERSON OBL IGAiED ON YOUA REAL PR OPER 7Y SE NAfiY TO O6iA L4 A LOAN, A POflTION OF NM ICH MAY BE E%PENOEO FOR ?UR POSES OT HEN THAN IMPA OVEMEAI DF iNE LAND./%~Yw[~ /r .Harry Iltn. 1965 l/ - MI Y27TT~-- TILL SIGNRTURE$ MUST BE NOTAR TIED 2 • ~a'~ /; } RESOLUTION N0. ~E82~-O6-BiR ~ ~ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAilCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM FRED JANZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of Street Improvements along 9942 Almond Street 'was approved by City Council on October 17, 1984 and recorded in San Dernardino County on October 25, 1984, Instrument No. 84-256175; and WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project, the lender requires that the above-mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordinate Agreement be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Suhord ination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of february, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authelet, ity C erk jaa n•mv nn n w vn v~ nr.n ...rn..., . • STAFF REPORT ~~,,,.,.,oy~ t/ S ~~ ~' ww~ ~„ DATE: febru ary 6, 1985 T0: fity Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Huhbs, City Engineer BY: 3a rbara Kroll, Engineering Technician 19'C SUBJECT: Approval of Consultant Contract with Linville, Civil Engineers/Surveyors, Inc. far the Reconstruction of Hermosa Avenue 130 feet south of Mignonette Street to Nineteenth Street. Contract not-to-exceed E3,950.00. Attached is an Agreement far Consultant Services for the design of the above subject project. Said services will include design evaluation and plans for street improvement, quantity and cost estimates and rough grade and curb staking for the project area. • This project is to be constructed along with Tract No. 11625. RECQMENDATIOM It is recommended that City Council approve the attached Agreement, sub,i ect to approval by an impartial attorney, awarding the Consultant Services for the above described project to Linville, Civil Engineers/Surveyors, tnc. and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement, fontract not to exceed 53,950.00. Respectful l~yJz~u7~bmi,Cted~,~ ~~~ !/ LBH: ~a AttacUUUUUUhment ~~ AGREEMENT FCR CONSULTANT SERVICES THiS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of ,198_, between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Linville-Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors, Inc. hereinafter referred tc as "Consultant". WITNES SETH: WHEREAS, the City desires to prepare designs, construction plans, specifications and cost estimates for Hermosa Rvenue 130 Feet South of Mignonette Street to tlineteenth Street hereinafter referred to as "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has the necessary skills and qualifications and licences required by law to perform the services required under this • Agreement in connection with said Project; and WHEREAS, the City desires to retain the Consultant for services hereinafter described in connection with said Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of February, 1985, authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties that: 1. DEFINITIONS. As used in this Agreement, the following definitions shall be applicable: a. Consultant. Consultant shall mean Linville-Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors, Inc. a California Corporation located at 9333 Base Line Road, Suite 190, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701. ® -1- b. City. City shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation, located at 9320 base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. c. City Council. City Council shall mean the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d. Services. Services shall mean the services to be performed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. e. Satisfactory. Satisfactory shall mean satisfactory to the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform for, and furnish to, the City the services described in Exhibit A, "Scope of Services" attached hereto. 3. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. The Consulant agrees that it shall • delingently and responsibly pursue the performance of the services required of it by this Agreement and that said services shall be completed within 30 calendar days after execution of this Agreement in accordance with the Project Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit 8, If a delay beyond the control of the Consultant is encountered, a time extension may be mutually agreed upon in writing by the City and the Consultant. The Consultant shall present documentation satisfactory to the City to substantiate any request for a time extension. 4. PAYMENT. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, upon satisfactory completion of the services described in the "SCOPE OF SERVICES", (Exhibit A) the Consultant shall be compensated based upon the actual time spent on the Project at the Consultant's standard hourly • rates attached hereto as Exhibit C, plus outside services, but shall not exceed a total amount of E3,950.00. _p. ^// In the event of authorization, in writing, by the City of changes from the work as indicated in Ezh ibit A or for other written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated herein, additional compensation shall be allowed for such extra work based upon the Consultant's standard hourly rates (See Exhibit C). The Consultant shall submit invoices which specify the area where work was completed and the associated time for completion to the City far approval, The Consultant agrees to invoice the City for services rendered not more often than once a month. Work performed at the request of the City, outside the limit specified in this Agreement, is to be designated as "Extra Work" on monthly invoices. Work performed in connection with an authorized written change order will be so desi9nat ed on said invoice. • 5. CITY SUPPORT. The City shall provide the following items of supDOrt to the Consultant: a. Provide a staff engineer to work with [he Consultant for the purpose of giving advice and to provide coordination within the scope of this Agreement. b. Make available aid provide all existing data and information relevant to the proposed Project. c. Provide all right-of-way negotiations. d. Provide environmental processing. e. Provide traffic index. f. Provide plans and specifications for Kidding. g. Prepare and mail final utility notice. 6. SUSPENSIDN, TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof, Cy serving upon the Consultant at least fifteen (16) days prior to -3- • written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless Lhe notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days of service of said notice, the City shall pay to the Consultant all earned and unpaid fees and costs based upon the rates attached hereto as Exhibit C, plus outside services, but the sum so paid shall not exceed a dollar figure which hears the same proportionate relationship to 53,950,00 as the quantity of work completed by the consultant bears to 100: of the work prescribed herein. If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. 1. BREACH OF CONTRACT. If the Consultant defaults in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall have • ten (10) days after service upon it of written notice of such default in which to cure the default 6y rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may he entitied at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. • -4- y~ 9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents Shall have control aver the conduct of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. 10. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed 6y it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with ali such laws and regulations. The City, its officers and • employees shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 11. ASSI GNh1ENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any moneys due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. 12. INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain general liability and workers compensation insurance coverage effective on the first day of work and in full force throughout the full term of this Agreement. The policy or policies shall he underwritten by insurers admitted to operate in the State of California, on forms no less broad in the scope of coverage than standard forms. Entire limits of liability maintained must be certified but in no event shall limits 6e less than specified hereinbelow. Any aggregate limitation of liability shall be separate as to the risks arising out of the subject matter of this proposal. _5_ _; -7 • Coves e Minimum Limit Workers' Compensation & Employer's Liability 5100,000.00 Comprehensive General liability/Comprehensive 5500,000.00 Auto Liability Combined single limit each oaurance If requested, the Consultant agrees to deposit with the City, certificates of insurance to satisfy the City that insurance requirements of this Agreement have been complied with, and to keep such insu rance in effect and the certificates therefore on deposit with the City during the entire term of this Agreement. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto and supersede all ti ti d iti t t th t tt i i b h f • nego ons an pr a or wr ng n respec o e su jec ma er ereo . :n the event of conflict 6e tween the terms, conditions or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instru ment, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused th is Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGy LINVILLE-CIVIL ENGINEERS/LRND SURVEYORS, INC. ~ ~ Jon D. Mikels, Mayor Date: Title: L'dt.5r©6nr/ ATTEST: Date: rLZ~E~ 0 Bever y A. Authelet, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: • By Date: ity Attorney _6. 7 G FXhihit "A" • SCOPE OF SIIiVICFS Predesign meeting with City Staff. Conduct Field Surveys (Togo and Sections) necessary for design. Supply Citl' with Field Survey Notes. Complete design for Improvanent Plans. Prepaze Improvement Plans per City Standards which will designate Topography within ultimate street right-of-ways, existing utility locations, construction limits, existing, Proposed, and future profiles, general and construction notes and estimate of quantities at the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Plot proposed and existing street sections at maximun 50 foot intervals within ultimate street right-of-nays. Prepare and maintain design files for transmittal to City upon request. • SUnply Construction Survey Staking and Coordination. Attend coordination and pre-constructior. meetinfs with City as requested. =j'/r EYhibit "6" PEiL17ECP SCEtE:UULE Description: Calendar Davs Complete preliminary Field Surveys 4 Complete Improvement Plans ,Estimate of Quantities and Plotted Sections for 1st review by City 6 Complete Improvement Plans for City Approval 6 Total: 16 L 'R~e above schedule does not include City review time between submittals for review or the construction phase. • ~~ J • Exhibit "C" O~~'Sl.'LTa\T'S STAt~D:ll7D HOLRLS kL1T&S Principal ~ S 66/hr. Office Engineer 350/hr. Technician S 30j hr. Secretary S 18/hr. 2-Stan Survey Crev S 96/hr. 3-J~'an Sun'ey Crew S 126/hr. In-Iiouse Printing :1t Cost "lot to Ercecd^ Artqunt--------$ 3,950.00 • u ~i/ • _ _ .. .. .. -. ~~-... .iV1 STAFF REPORT ~'~. ~ 1^. ti: h Z GATE: February 6, 1985 ._ ~ ' ~v'- T0; City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY; Barbara Kroll, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: Intent to annex Tract Nos. 12320, 12490, 11606-1, 10046, 10047, and 12721 to Street Lighting Maintenance Oistri ct Nos. 1 and 2 and Annexation fio. 8 and No. 6 respectively and setting the publfc fie aring for March 6, 1985 Attached for City Council approval are resolutions setting the public hearing for annexation of the above referenced Street lighting Maintenance Districts. The Engineer's Report for both districts showing the number of street lights, the number of lots to ve annexed into each district and the estimated amount of assessments are attached for preliminary approval. The following is a list of projects to be annexed: District No. 1 District No. 2 (Arterial) {Local liohts) Tract 12320 Tract 12320 12490 11606-1 11606-1 10046 10046 10047 10047 9619 12)21 RECOM~ENDAT1t1N It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the date of the public hearing for March 6, 1985, and giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report. Re ectfull su fitted, ~LBH: K Atta hmen is ~~_ ~.. , --~ _~.°, t PtA2A BUILCFJ+S ":ti/ InICORPdiATEO ]'.3i .A Ai nvav Avenue Casa Mesa Ca•JOrrva 9M'<5 ~+ 052a9W November 15, 1984 Mr. John L. Martin Assistant Civil Engineer Community Development Dept. Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Tract 9619 Dear Mr. Martin: U Please be informed that it is our intention as the owner/ developer of Tract 9619, located in the City of • Rancho Cucamonga, to join the City Maintenance District X1 £or the purposes of landscape and lighting main- tenance upon completion of our offsite improvements. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, G orge R. Meek r, Jr. President GRM:mb • A Subsidiary cf Calilornia Federal Savings and Loan Associatior. ~v ~ robertson homes/youthPrn • e Erv1s100 or ree„a rerp9,e lisp ronhecrois license numtar di9)i5 665]fmbiReder0dmf ~s1IXMton, to 95 E09 i~09195).5991 I WlcaolN dove smbl@ rollart u9D3i ~ I]I it l]0d200 November 8, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pu61is Works Department 9320 Baseline Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Re: Tract # 12721 Woodsong Village Gentlemen, Robertson Homes hearby request that it be admitted to the city of Rancho Cucamonga landscape and lighting district. Th you or your cooperation. Y IT~ , • 1 Gar Mazu~/ of t Manager a division of CATWZL CORPORATION GM:cs lG ~f _ Novemher 19, 1964 I1oni [tuhhs City ~gineer City of Ranctq Cucaironaa 9320 Baseline F3~ad, Sate C Post Office Box 607 Rarc!n Ncatmnaa, CA 91730 , Re: 'iYacts 10046 S 10047 Dear' :Nr. Hubbs: We desire tv join the landscaping and street light maintenance distracts in the City of Rancho Cucarmnga for tracts referenced alnve. VerY~trlulY }roars, • J ~6'i~1~EV~~ ' Senior Vice President F4R2: pt cc: James R. Hnutson • 7h~ And~n Oroup 16133 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1270, Encino, Calilornia 91436, TelepAOne 213.872.03& BARCLAYS PROPERTIES, INC. Sovember °6. 195!. Cier of Rancho Cuca m„onto Department of Engineering P. 0. Box 9fi. 9340 Baseline Rancho Cucamongo, California 91730 RE: Tract 11E06-1 Gentleaen; k~e are the developers of the above named Tract, which we wish Co hate included in the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape and LighCing District. This LetCer will serve as our formal notice of intent to join . such districts. Sincerel}', ~/J fl~,t~ i c2~rtfw~ 4-t~~~ a garec Pa r.~e la Parrish B,1 C t5 TdC MPP/nt \\ 17702 COWAN STREET • IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714 • ptgl 476000 American National Group 405 So. Beve^v O^~.e Eie~ty Hills. California 90212 • X213; 879 0900 EET Ono F. Schme4era. Jr. Gn mrman o' me aoaro v Y ^ ?m .U September 10, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dept. of Engineering P.O. Box 807 9340 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Tract 12490 Gent Lumen: F1e are the developers of the above named Tract, which we wish to have included in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape and Lighting District. This letter will serve as our formal notice of intent to join such districts. Sincerely, Martha Schnieders MSS/mtc Real Estate Services Ir~stment ~ C)ael9^ ~ [~vebprnent ~ Cons[nictien ~ Fnence • Merke[irg • Menegartertt • Itaeurerce l~ CIiY .,'r Rni1C1{0 CCCF'.t01iC.'r EfI,iNEEP.!N6 CIV1S:Otl • r L ~ i February 2S, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering De oartment P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: John Martin Re: Tract 12320, Hurt ington Villas Request for Membership-Landscape s Lighting [4aintenance District • Gentlemen: As requested, please accept this letter as a request for membership into and participation in the Landscape and Lighting bfain to nance District for Tract 12320, Rancho Cucamonga. Thank you for your time and consideration. Should you require any further information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, TERRA WEST DEVELOPMENT CO. y David Boucher Project Manager xc: Correspondence File Suite 276 1505 E. 171M1 Street Sonia Ana, CA 92705 711-953-5322 171 W. Juana Street San Leandro. CA 91577 115••SBS1B71 Ic,~ .. • CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 8 Tract Nos. 12320, 12490, 11606-1, 10046, 10047 and 12721 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SEC7IDN 2. General Description This "ity Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. the City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained wi 17 have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the 5trpet lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual • maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall he considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street tights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting df strict include; the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the su6j ect area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for 5tr eel lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Bas e4 on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 • (including Annexation No. 8 comprised of 616 lots and 14 9500E street lights and/or G 5800E lights) is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: L amo Size* Quantity Rate** 9500E 168 9,gp S600L 110 8.J5 *H igh Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamps Rate Mo's Total 168 X 9.90 X 12 = $19,958.40 11D X 8.75 X 12 $11,550.00 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost 31,508.40 = 6.14/year/unit No. of Units in District 5126 6.14 divided by 12 = 0.51/mo./unit • Assessment shalt apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Dia9r am Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", Annexation No. 8. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall he proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. ' It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings, 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's • Report. lIL • 3. City Council adapts Resolution of Intention to annex to District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the Lity Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. C~ 1 EXHIBIT "A" • Properties and improvements to 6e included within Rnnexation tlo. 8 of Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Tract No. Unit No. of Street Lights 12320 60 Condo 4 @ 9500E 12490 144 Condo 3 @ 9500E 11605-1 41 S.F. 0 10046 27 S.F. 2 @ 5800E 10041 43 S.f. 4 @ 9500E 12721 270 Condo 3 @ 9500E 9619 31 Lots 3 @ 5800E r 1 U • r i~ ~ RESOLUTION N0. .E02--66~k3R ^l _> • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO STREET LIGHTING h1A INTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on February 6, 1985, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE [T RESOLVED by the City Council of [he City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and erpenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the 6o undaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and Confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to 6e received 6y said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 113 RESOLUTION N0. bB2-96-k]R ` A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTI OfI TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASS ESSh1ENT DISTRIQ: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 8 TO STREET LIGHTI;IG hW INTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LI G'dT I'IG ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AiJO 7LACE FOR REARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, TH'c REEORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with saSd district. • SECTION 2. Location of lJork: The foregoing described work is to 6e located within roadway right-of-way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps ~nhich are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation 'lo. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1". SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public 6enef it, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: Atl that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior 6o undary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 8 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" maps is on file in Lhe office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer; The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of Bald City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and ertent of the assessments and far the ezt ent of the work. I SECTION 5. Collection of Rssessments: The assessment shall be • collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments far the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on March 6, 1985, at the hour of 7:30 pm in the Lity Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient Lo identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Light in9 Act of 1912: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. . SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6196 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, a ifornia, and circulated in Che City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSEG, APPROVE O, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa Jon D. Nike s, Mayor 1 J ,5 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ACJNEXATION NO. 8 7 . ._ ,< ! .r.. ..:~~ -----11-.,\~~s. <, -- K... ,,,-, ~_.,... _. ~., e... .._. , `I --- ~~ ~ ~,z%4' ~ ,~ :: ~.,~' .,/I ITS \PS. ^e ~ ' ~I e f~ Z .:~.,,I 11 z.' r~c t n ro ~~b l' _ I _'-_ r ~~...~ ~ -~ ~.. .,i F ..+ s lo~ ' ~ i x. wi I~~' e..ai ~ / >U~.i. i Fl~i4 ~ '~ I ' I r r` M t / 4 ~ ` . .o. o ~ . n„ ill ._.... o ~ ti ' ~ ASSESS11AE~1T DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 • ACJNEXATION NO. 8 1 r,.i:~.~=i: r :. r_ .~ I i ~ ~ I, ~ ' ~ _~~ ~; `O`-yam' I ~ ~~~. _pk i{ L p 4 . r ^ T~ r~ ~ ~ r >_ I ~ w rel. ~i`S~ i _ % / ..~ ( ~. /\v ~.. L '~~r.l'f' Irk ~i^ Il i f. [ ~,<^-~hT I l y ~Y r ). .Ind / ~~~T l,~~tl1".I~~~µ~ ~~~•~_,..r 'n ~. ~ 'r'_•'^^' ,tx/ r re x,01 ',^~ .. 'f `:.- ~,,~.. rr ~ i It. ; ~i ~`; ~ : • ~, ',I r i 0 t.\A.` ~i7 ,pyi' r '~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w title _ ':;~~~' COUNTY OF 3AN BERNARDINO /\ ranr ~~ w i~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA -- ~~ _ un LLOYO MUBBS CITY ENGNEER R.C E.23889 DATE page ASSESSAAE~IT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ACJNEXATION NO. 8 • • .~ ,• r-.,~" 'ice .._.~_ ... ~~ ~~I ilk. ~~.~'ii' ~:._ - ~ ra ~ ~, ., .- . a _ ~ 4i'f . ~ r. ~~^ ~_~, .y~:. :i ASSESSAAEJYT DIAGRAAA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 • ACJNEXATION NO. 8 ' _.... __ ,~ •. _ _ -- ., - - - - -- ;, -- =~, - - '--~ _ _ .,;. ,, , .ii ..I ill .l . _ .~ I'~I .. ~_ .~~. ~~-i '1 i ^.'I •... I .~ '1 i '~.~ 1 • __ 9~ -~ ~'li ... ... ~~.. ...:r- L.,~ ~'t: _ .~.~^t. ~~' 1 ~ ~ / I 1 .~ 1 / ~ r ~ ~ `"f '~V. ,y, r~, _ _ `: r i , s-t.__.::..~- __ _ - .r iT ~Te r , ~~\ . _ ;~`Oy~"4'°'.,. CITY OF R ANCHO CUCAMONGA w title Y ~,,. '' = COUNTY OF 9AN BERNARDINO / \ :yrrh _ -- ~; '?~ STATE OF CALIFUR T=nr ~~>- NIA im _ LLOYD HU888. CITY ENGINEER R CE 23889 D T4 E 0'ge ASSESSMEiVT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 APJNEXATION NO. 8 • a: %~ i t ::;1 n „ % ~q~i (~~i.-( _- ~ ~i..r'?'~ L~;4f. ~ r. to ~ ,1 I t ` r, '~'~I:..'I ~i ~ - ' i, ii / O. ..il,In~ ~ J a ' ~ - 1 : r .. ,, . ~ il'k' ~ - ~ _ ,; ., ~ I i -~ - - - i i1, v r i ~ ~ i. ~ I ! jt, y.7 ~_ % j .I ~ ~ . f -1 i cis -o ~ I it i F ; .'3 ~ ^% ~ ~f flf ~~%~ ;,,oy=--° s ; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ,rL~h~ .._ ~;~~' i~ STATE OF CAIdir'ORNIA ~~ -= N un .. _ .... .......... _. _.. ..._...--- -------- title; page ASSESS~IAEAIT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 • ACJNEXATION NO. 8 . i--_'.'_----_-_--~I-' ~'--_ --__ _ 2 .,~ ... 3.. ~ 30 31 1 -• ~. __-_ :~~< 29 ~ .-~~ I ~ .~ i f~ _] -_ ~~__22 for ~~ + 19 X5'.__5. ~ .. e_.~ . ~ V6 ~I - ; ~---Jr i v. _ e~~ ', 7 I t? 14 i6 , ~ W7 .. -. ~: '. - 6 ifi ._ _ - ~ f~ ~-4 13 1P rl, , 10 9 'I .. .. ~ °~ ;.~°y~'"1p ; CITY OF RANCHO CUC cic r ;,, AMONGA w ,;-_'. _ COUNTY OF J3AN BERNARDINO ,\ TF ~i ~ +~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA - L___~> 157, - LLOYp HUBBS CITY ENGINEER RCE.23B89 p-qTE pal ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DI STRICT NO. 1 C 8 A ~NEXATION NO. , i,..~-~ . . _. ... . - ._-~t_,.~_.._- --- .. __ -----~_--- _ _. -- .~ ~ ~ g - -~- - ~ ~ ~~ 1' ~ . I ,_ _ t,~ _ ., _ ~ ~. ._. ____.__ '~ __ _ I, .J.~ ~ ~_ ._ .. ... ._ _ ;~_ __ _.____ '~ I ~~ ~ .O h~ •-r, r,: __._ _ 1. i -" ~~ _ _ _ - „_, . it a. o~~-`~^"°5:. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t~cle; ~ A x~ ., ;~~: ;} COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO / \ TRACT 12721 : >: ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Vi ~~' rY N NTi 1 LlIVO MIIRRC nrv cur.:mcco A r'c 9ioon n.r~ '~ pag! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Engineer's Report far Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 6 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter I, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SE CTIDN 2. General Description This City Council has elected to "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance determined that the street lights to all lots within said tracts as well street lights. annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit District No. 2. The City Council has 6e maintained will have an effect upon as on the lots directly abutting the Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local residential streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of • general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall 6e divided on a per lot 6asi s. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications far street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is herehy made a part of this report Lo the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing far the illumination of [he subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred far street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These casts are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Idj The estimated total cost for lighting Maintenance District No. 2 • (including Annexation No. 6 comprised of 202 lots and 73 street lights) is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* quantity Rate** *H igh Pressure Sodium Vapor **SCE Schedule LS-1. A71 night service per map per month, effective January 1, 1983. Lamps Rate Mo's Tat al 388 % 8.75 % 12 = $40,740.00 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Total Annual t-0ainten ante Cost = 40,J40.00 =29.29/year/unit No. of Units in District 1391 29.29 divided by 12 = 2.44/mo./unit • Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Rssessment Di agr am Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", Annexation No. 6. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment far each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTIOII 1. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's • Report. ~~u • 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in ~1ay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves Lhe individual assessments. • :~ exHlslr ^a^ Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 6 of Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: Tract Street Lights !6800L 12320 2 11606-1 17 10046 16 10047 22 9619 16 lJ • ~4 RESOLUTION NU. F,01-96-1gR ~~ 7 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 WHEREAS, on February 6, 1985, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should 6e modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the bcundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and to nfirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed, SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. --. ~, ., ~°7 RESOLUTION N0.-€42--06-16R-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNE%RTION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNE%ATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 6 TO STREET LIGHTL'iG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LAN DS CAP I~"!G AND LIGHTIPG ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO YOW, THEREFORE BE [T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district descrihed in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. • SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located within roadway right-of-way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation :lo. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2". SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary pu6l is benefit, and the said City Council herehy makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annezation ilo. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance Oi st rict No. 2" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and ® extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. l~~ SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be • collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually tend uct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on March 6, i985, at the hour of 1:30 pm in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections wilt be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last egualized assessment ro 71 of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 1. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. • SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 96 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the Ci*.y Clerk shalt cause the same to he published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least onto in The ~Dai ly Re o~rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ont ar io,~lifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSE G, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon 0. Mikel s, I4ayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk • jag la~j ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 6 • ~.r 4, , . r i ri ~I. t 1 ~ III r ~~ ` :y R. to }l ~ :r r ~ n .,, „ ae~„A ~ '~~l_- .~'-y v .,. ~ -.-....- .j;~:.r r- .. . ~" "'°~;. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~r~' T ,° COUNTY OF SAN SERNARDINO rcin " n~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA - ~ T ~l 6 +> lv im r i nvn u1 rFRC cirv ENGINEER R.C E.23889 OAI'E page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 2 ACJNEXATION NO. 6 • - I r n\ I _~`1 '~\ r u-s ~_u m~r ~ .. ~ zz t~ y' ~/;~}~ \..4 tl\ zr ~^ ~: _ ~ ' ~ ~ s'~~ ~, ~~a ~. ter' I, ~ ~ ' u ,,., ~ 3' ~I' rl r iy ~. Ls II: ~. ~ io v~,j~~, .m, e~!~~ ~ ~ ~Y ~~ ~ .~. . .1 ~ ~~s a, ~ ', rwi .,~i".. ~r ..n~ ti~r 1 ~~ r~--_~-~ _~n-^ '~a .1 11 ~- yi• I ~ ~ n ,us. v F~ ~~ ICI n v ... ~ ~ f~+t[p ' ~ _ ._, I~ -~------ ..... o°"y'~'`'0t^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'fir i i:. Y;,,~.~~= COUNTY OF 9AN BERNARDINO ~~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA t,~ A title roerT gFtq N o,g~ • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ACJNEXATION NO. 6 • ~ I r I r.,. i. ;_ ~ ~ ~ - I o /: - ' ~-cr Ir _.~ ~ ~; ~; ~ _. ~ ~ ,. I~'I ~~ ~. ~ .: y(•I~ -w fit. ~i~ `'. ,, :~t_,. ~._L~~- ":h.-°:1. ~_~~ t f It ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ '~ I ' 1 ,; ~ J; . 4'~r~l- 1 ~ '~ f -r ". ~~. ~1 F' i ~ 1, ~ y ti ~ vL i >< Yn ~' ~ i;i ~~~' i> nn i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG w COUNTY OF SAN gERNpRDINO / \ 8TATE OF CALIFORNIA ~T .OYD HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER R.CF?3aao ~~ 1 r;; '„ .. ,_. =,~~C4`. ". .. ~' t .a->-. =:i.. title; page ASSESSME~lT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIN ENANCE DISTRICT NO. g • AC~NEXATION NO. 6 u ~r~ ^"~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ^ i ~. _' ..~ ~~ ~ COUNTY OF 9AN BERNARDINO c: ' ~; 6 ~ $TATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~ :~ N trn LLOYD MUBBS CITY ENGINEER acv 9aooe -.~ title; ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ACINEXATION NO. 6 • _ - ~ ~ .: .. 1 I 29 ~ 30 31 1 -, 2 ,. , ~~. . . ~- -, i._ ~2. . I ~ 19~ , . -~ ^ ~ ~~_ 2B _.._- __ ~ _._ _ g ~ ~ ~ ~ .... • a 18 ~ ~ 6 Y3 7 . 2 ~ ` ` ~ r _ i ~,, 24 ' 15 16 17 B , ~ -. .....n ~, I:, 14 13 12 1/ w. ti 1~ ~ 9 I ' r; (+~ _{,~ ~4 .. .. ~ ~, n..rv nc o n~rrvn rrr a~anvr ~ • a~ STAFF REPORT ! ~~,~'}n i ~ ~i ~-, A, ~'> DATE: February 6, 1985 _ ~z S 70: City Council and City Planager cr-' F RONr. Lloyd 3. Hubb s, City Engineer 8Y: Barbara Krail, Engineer Technician SUB,;ECT: Intent to annex Tract Nos. 12320, 12440, 11b06-1, 10046, 10047, 12721 and 9619 to Landscape Maintenance District No, 1 as Annexation No. 21 and setting the public hearing for March 6, 1985 The fallowing projects are being annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1: FINAL APPROVAL PRO,lECT LOCATION BY CItY COUNCIL TR 12320 S.E.C. Victoria St, and Archibald Avenue TR 12490 E/5 of Vineyard Ave. S/0 Foothill Blvd. TR 11606-1 E/0 Haven, S/0 19th St. at Victoria St. 7R 10046 W/D Hillside Rd between Archibald & Hermosa TR 10047 S/S Hillside Rd between Archibald & Hermosa TR 12721 S/0 Foothill Blvd. E/S of Vineyard Ave. TR 9619 W/S of Carnelian Ave, W/0 V icara Drive Attached far City Council approval is a rPSOlution declaring the City's intent to annex the shave described tracts to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and setting the public hearing date far March 6, 1985. Also attached for preliminary approval is the Engineer's Report for the annexation. RECOM£NDAtiON It is recommended that City Council adopt resolutions approving the Engineer's Report and setting the date of public hearing for March 6, 1985. Res ectf ully suh~tted x=1.8, : C•~ Attachments r 1r r ~~ °~ • CE'. Ei t`vNENi LO February 28, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: John Martin Re: Tract 12320, Huntington Villas Request for Membership-Landscape a Lighting Maintenance Dis t:• Gentlemen: As requested, please accept this letter as a request for membe rshio into and participation in the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District for Tract 12320, Rancho Cucamonga. Thank you for your time and consideration. Should you require any further information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, TERRA WEST DEVELOPMENT CO. David Boucher Project Manager xc: Correspondence File • Suite 216 1505 E. 17in Street 171 W.Juane 9ireet Senle Ana. CA 92705 San LeanOro, CA 9{t77 714953.5322 115-395-1377 American National Group 405 So BevFVry Orna Bevetty HiIISCaIRbrna 90212 • '213;8790900 Edmund i. SC~nleden. Jr. Cnartman of :re aoa rd ,: ~i I.a bn ~,. 7 J _ .:~ September 10, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dept. of Engineering P.O. Box 807 9340 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Tract 12490 • Gentlemen: _~iY C. fi FilCliO CC'..~C'bli0b E P9~HEEP.!NO GIV'4'A!I [9e are the developers of the above named Tract, which we wish to have included in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape and Lighting District. This letter will serve as our formal notice of intent to join such districts. Sincerely, Martha Schnieders MSS/mtc i ~ Real Estate Services 1 i IMHBtfrlant ~ Design ~ Devebprnent ~ Conetr.JCtion ~ Finance ~ Marketing. Menegelnerx ~ IreuPen(,`e e BARCLAYS PROPERTIES, INC. November 26, !994 City of Rancho Cucamongo Department of Engineering P. 0. Box A07 9350 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, California 91. RE: Tract 11505-i Gentlemen: We are [he developers of the above named Tract, which we wish [o have included in [he City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape and Lighting District. This Letter o~i 11 serve as our formal notice of intent [o join such districts. ~ Sincerelc, /7 7ii~ ,r,,. i U:i.CCla. /ic~:,~ a/ ga ryet Pamela Parrish eakctrtt's roc MPP!nt • ~\ 132 17702 COWAN STREET ~ IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714 ~ 17141 4740300 Novanher 19, 1984 Lloyd Huhbs City IIigineer City of FancM Cucaimnga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Post Office Box 807 Fancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Tracts 10046 s 10047 Dear Nti-, tiubbs: We desire to join the larciscaping and street light maintenance dist>;ucts in the City o£ Rancho Cucaaonga for trnets referenced al,ove. Y V~~~) ~~sr "Mi~rl Senior V~e President ~4iR:pt cc: James R. wrutson C~ 133 fM AnASn Group 1E133 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1270, Encino, California 91438, Telephone 213.872.8384 robertxon homer/~+on~np~n a divison of <mw~l <oryorabon convacror's license number 3a~ 665J embundero dma .noaMOn ca cs]n9 ~~20m 9P59fl~ INI[aolN dnvfl fm1e i02 ~coilan u92)$i ~ Clai l]0@00 November 8, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Department 9320 Baseline Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Re: Tract A 12721 Woodsong Village. Gentlemen, Robertson Romes hearby request that it be admitted to the city of Rancho Cucamonga landscape and lighting district. you ~or your cooperation. • Manager a divis}~on of CATWIL CORPORATION GM:cs • I ] `~ J "1 Jra'~a avv.av A~=nue costa !desa Cab r.,a ~25P -•~ ~eza'r. November 15, 1984 Mr. John L. Martin Assistant Civil Engineer Community Development Dept. Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Tract 9619 Dear Mr. Martin: • Please be informed that it is our intention as the owner/ developer of Tract 9619, located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to join the City Maintenance District B1 for the purposes of landscape and lighting main- tenance upon completion of our offsite improvements. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, George R. Meek r, Jr. President GRM:mb i~5 A SuOvoiarr el ,a L'~rnia Fotler al Sav mgs antl Loan Aggociatwn • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNEXATION N0. 21 to the Landscape hlainten ante District IJ o. 1 Tract Nos. 12320, 12490, 1160fi-1, 10046, 10047, 12721 And 9619 SECTION 1. Authority far Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex ail new tracts into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 12320, 12490, 11606-1, 10046, 10047, 12721 and 9619 as well as on the lots directly ahu tt ing the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the Tract Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by the developer and have been approved as part of the improvevent plans for Tract Nos. 12320, 12490, 11606-1, 10046, 10047, 12121 and 9619. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in conformance with the Planning Commission. Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract Map and the assessment diayr ors - the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to hhe same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway Smprovement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cast data. ~?a The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance Oistri ct No. 1 • (including Annexation No. 21 Comprised of 19,145 square feet of landscaped area) is shown below: Total Annual 'd ainten ante Cost $.30 X 535,018 square feet = 160,505.40 Per Lot Annual Assessment 160.105.40 = 36.93 4346 Per Lot Monthly Assessment 36.93 = 3.08 12 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment Diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced by the amount saved by the District due to said homeowner maintenance. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of Che proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and • labeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diagr a;n is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for Annexation No. 21 is found to be of general benefit to all lots within [he District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June 1985, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the 1982/83 fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as reyu iced by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1912. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the Oistr ict or abandon the proceedings. • 5. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. j ~ r7 RESOLUTION N0. `^~~-iz+~ ~ = - ~ ' • _ _. i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO UIJC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PREL IfJI NARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEKATI O~J N0. 21 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on February 6, 19&S, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED 6y the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report 6e, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTI O~J 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SE CT IGN 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to he received by said suhdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. ~zk l • RESOL UT IDN Y0. `^~' "w`-i~~- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU"IC IL OF THE CITY OF RASCHO CUCAMCNGA, CALIFORNIA DE GLARING ITS INTENTION TO OR OER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MA PITENANCE DISTR;CT `!0. 1, Afl ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGIIATING SAID Ai1NEXAT ION AS ANNEXATION Y0. 21 TO LANDSCAPE MItINTENANCE DISTRICT ;10. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LAYDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACi OF 1572 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTI OBIS THERETO NO'W, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SE CTIO"! 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes uy deed or recorded subdivi5 ion tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of • any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and wails in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of 'Work: The foregoing described work is to be located within roadway right-of-way and landscaping eas ement5 of Landscape l4aint en ante District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 21 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1". SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said Gity Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is de scribed as follows: All that certain territory of [he City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary tines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 21 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. * indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City, SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said Lity Dy Resolution No. * has aDProved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer`s Report, Annexation No, 21, Landscape iAainten ante District Yo. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said • City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City 'c ng ineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council dill annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on March 3,-3~, at the hour o 0 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 9161 3as2 Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must he deiivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Lan dscaeing and Lighting Act of 1972; All the work • herein proposed shall he done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lf ghting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Pu6l ication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6 96 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be pubiished 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dai~Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of Eebru ary, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on D. i4ikels, Mayor ATTEST: • Bever y A. Authe et, icy er jaa ~Yv ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM U LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 21 _ -. --_ 29 30 Jt -~_~~~~~~ '~ ~~~ - ._. ~. 3 M1 __-~~_ I ._.... ~ 26 _~ - r `;_~~_ 21~ 1 20 4_. •. a - '~_ ~til i ,..ems K ~: ' fi 2) ' ~I _ 6 .r. - ~. =~ ~_~ - _ .i 26 .,. .,, ~ . ~ _ 1L1Lf+ ~ i..__ _-6 ~~ 15 i6~~' ~) 6 'f - _ s..~ --_~ ~ ~_ _ ~_. ~ / _. _ _ i.. ... ...J ,... ". fl; ~~ ~~~~C.1 tlp~, ~,.y u) CITI OF RANCHO CUCA,~IONGA w a , / \ ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION inn VICINITY MAP ~~~' N page ;ASSESSMEiVT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 21 N ~ . ~ 1 ~ Ld r I I ~ ~ ~ , ... ~ 7 .~ ~ ,. ; ~. .~. c .~ i : ~: ~ i. *, ~ t j ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~. , . ; ,. ,~ i y~ , .. l ~ -- ~ ~ ~' 4~r ; ; I ~cil:~ •~ :ii -i ie Fes, ~I e" _ a .~"~''°i~ cITY of a~~ti~c--lo cc;c~,~lo`c,~ ~'~ ~~ ~! ~~-" ~~ ENGINEERING DIVISION y~ ~-~'r i~ ~ T 1RACT 12490 nn 1 VICINITY N1AP l~J Page • L~ .:ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 21 .. .... ..... ' : _ _, _ - - ' _ r ... ~-- - -- - ~'. - i-. 1.,x.,1 I~~i-.: . . - I ~ - ..1 ~ ~ . 1-q..-a. . , r ~ ~ .... :L i.li - -' - ~ ~ ..1 •. .~~.. . .. - __ i' - n-- - , i'- 1 _ 1- ~. ~ 1.,. 'r i' ~ .. ^T_.,,,1 f - .i. ~ ~,, 1 ~ I 1 I ~ ~ r Il ..~ / ! • M r~Yl l e S . ~• .. c .\ •... ~ . • e va'.. ~1. i_ `f ~L ~.~ ~i ~`°"~4~1^ CITY OF RANCHO CI;C ~~ ~'+'~ AAtONGA S ° ENGINEERING DIVISION f~ A c VICINITY MAP N TRACT 11606-1 im 1 ~I Pa$e ;ASSESSMEiVT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 21 - ~ ~.. { ~, ,, ''~ , ::;; , ~/~,. ~ ''d~ I . I .. i. !~~ • , ~-_ ~, `CC'_~1jp'~ CITY OF RA\CIiO Cl;C.1,~lONGA A ~ . q / L~ ~,.,., i ~ ENGINEERING DR'ISION / \ TRACT 10046 t J ' VICINITY MAP N I a e P B :~ • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 21 --- : I ~.,.i_ ~~ _.~ ~ .' ~'~ i 1, . ::j I II IIi __: --'r"'-+~.-~..1~v_^I :u-t ~Cll.~~_, ~~ I L._. F~. r~ivy ~~. N,~ 4 F a ` ~ 11 ~~ I! l r "~. !~ v t .~,.~ ll. i y _~- i.i~. --ilrt ~' ~.` I ~ ~ ~~~ art F ; y Y ~f I1~ . i ~ Ili '/ \ ; ' ^"~ i ~ I ;4 I T • T.~.-n~} 1 5 ~ L ~1 ~ k ~ 1 ~ i~i a.eA ~.i~ rY ~ ~ t; f ~., li' .~ n t ~ ~:_ r li a i -r i .l ~ is !- ~' _ .__ ~~ ~'....: .,,, .~.. Vii. _ _-_'_. _ `1 I_' ACC \ 4p `~ar~. ~ i ¢> ll "~~ 3! = "~ _ ~ 7.ywN%~ C y7~ CITI' OF RA\CHO CCCA.,\10~GA S ENGINEERING DIVISION /'\ VICINITY MAP N TRACI page ;ASSESSMEUT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 • ANNEXATION NO. 21 .. ~ _, ._ ....._ ~ - - _ +°'~, ~. _' is _ , _ ..__.. _. -- _- _:- ::. ~ _ ~_ -- - - -- '- ill: __ - . . , _ _=__..-=~j_~ - ~ 1 "f '~ ' - _ ~ _. . . ,. _ __ ._-.. _ i -i ~'/~o O°y~'~ni• ~~ ~,~ CITY OF RAti`CHO C[;CA,~101'GA c.~_ A ~ 6 ~ ° ENCIYEERINC DIVI$Ip;v , ` z u nn VICINITY MAp ~ TRACT 1 ~1 page • ;ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 ANNEXATION NO. 21 ~ ~ r .~ ~ __ I.a ~l I I I J~ .r~• ~~ ~ ~~M :. ~ .. ~ ~ ~ GL r ~ , p E '_ nr ..e ~~.~ i .il F-_ ~ l l ~~ .,.:.,~:,I, ~~ ~.\ e ~L/ ,c Z Y z' ~_ zi' /M ~•P4 s~ •+~I ;........~. ~`li is: /~J ~~~(~^~`' ~j ~ W >e. ':/~11~ ~ ..~~ „~I ~'I"' a..v hr+ I rwr~. j./ , L f... ~0 ~,0 "'fin ~~~ / ~~~ CITY OP RANCHO CGCA,~ION~GA I~ ENGINEERING DIVISION ~1 ~ ' VICINITY (NAP ~T TRACT 9619 xn 1 v pa e RESOLCTION N0. 85-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OE RANCHO CL'CANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACKNOIJLEDGING NAi IONAL ENGINEERB' WEEK FEBRUARY " _ 17-?3,_ 1985 BY THE NATIONAL .SOCIETY OE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS '.JHE3EAS, the National Society or professional Engineers celebrates ':a tionai E r.g sneers' '.Je ek a^.nuaily during the week of George 'da s'nine tOn's `,rods ti ona~ bir*. Fd ay, in honor of our first ?resident who was a noted military engineer and land surveyor; and • 'W HE4EAS, engineering technology is a vital element in providing health. safety, and econor„„veal growth. for the citizens of the !n land E~^.pire, the State of California, antl the Nation: and WHEREAS, the engineering profession is composed of members in all technical branches employed in private practSCe. industry, education, government, one construction; and tiHEREAS, the van ous local, State, and National Engineering Societies have ;oined efforts to provide an educational Engineers 'Reek for the public; and 'dH E4 EAS, the City Council has long recognized the value of the engineering profession in service to the public and supports Engineers' 'Week; and SlHE.4 EAS, the local Riverside-San Bernardino Chapter 20 of the California Society of Professional Engineers has keen actively involved in planning for the various local activities; VOW THEREFORE BE Ii RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCP.MONCA Sbaben4~ rGaki,4an/kwart+NR+N,9gY~k+9~9'RRM/R+d~AV1Yp,kdd/.GRrfy++++k++++++++++++++~~w that the week of February 17 - 23, 1985, be recognized as National Engineers' Week •iM'11~NA+Mtn+KAgaMgJF+iq,&i.Agwqdrqfe++ k' RESAO :BofA Rea :baa • RESOLDTION NO. BS- A RESOLOTION OF THE CITY CODNCIL OP TAE CITY OF RANCBO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING APPLICATION FOE BANE OF AMERICA CARD SEAVTCE HBEREAS, the Citq of Bancho Cucamonga desires to obtain Bank of American Visa hank cards from Bank of American NT65A (hereinafter called "BANK") for use by certain of [he City's officers and emplogees; and NHEAEAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga intends [o authorize said officers [o use such bank cards for and is connection with corporate bus inees; and NHEREAS, BANK will sot issue said beak cards m?sae [he Citq of Rancho Cucamonga agrees Co assume full reepooe ibil ity for use of such cards, or any of Them, and to psy BANK for all indebtedness incurred through the use of such cards, whether such use or indebtedneae wne authorized bq the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Chet Jon D. Nikele, Mayor, end Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk, are hereby mthorized, directed and empowered, in the . name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to apply to BANK for the issuance of a B cE A Viea bank card, and to axe cafe au<h appl i<atiooe and agreements ae BANK may require in order [o accompl ieh the foregoing. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, chat BANK ie authorized Ca act upon [hie Resolution until written not ice of its revocation is delivered to BANK, end [hat [he authority hereby granted shall apply with equal Eoi ce and effect to the successors in office of the of f icere named herein. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED [hie • day of February, 1985. AYES: NOE9: ABSENT; Jon D. Mike le, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk ~~1 APPLICATION COMMERCIAL BANKAMERICARD VISA [ommfrdfl •seuM s.niat M)17 101 ]. MVNgf n.wxw r,.mW~, cn unxx (x1]1 5]p~55!] ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ --~ 4320 Base Line Suite C Rancho Cucamonga California ~ 91730 Type o1 a11$~nf3] Bus. TflfpM1OM Municipal Government 714 ~ 999-1851 OWMrsMp ^ No. O1 Vf5. 1O Bui. Carwnlion $~ 7 putMnnip Q ~ Oinb ^ CompMy Checkup Ot/iu Loudon Odin No, Acct. No. Rwueslw Clftlil Lwrt N0. of Cfrtls 51500 y ccmww s~m.~~.• Jon D. Mikels Mayor .n..u (r.v..ml Corporate ResoUtion~ank Card Servi BANICAFAMERICA WHEREAS, this eorpornwn defirx to obtain B of A Visa Goa ~pp BANK OF AMERICA NTySA Mereinahb ullad~"BANK'7 for ux by wrxm of Me cwporati0n'a oNinra arM employee: +m WHEREAS, Me corpownon imends to auMOrize uid oflicaO and employee 10 ux auN bank urds for and in con neenon wiM corporate buur.ns; and WHEREAS. BANK will not iame uid DanY carts unlep Me eorpaation apes to anume hll rnponsibiGry for Me ua of such cards, or ary al ;hem, and to OaY BANK for dl inMDtedneu iMUrr+d Mrpugh Me ux of suM urds. whemer wcn use o indebudness was autnon:ed Dv Mt corooranon; NOW, THEREFORE, be It reolved tMt Jon D. Mike15 r the Mayor the prerdm or Me Vice prnident. and Beverly A. Atlthelet In saramy,-ar- the City Clerk ,McAtsittantSecretaryoltnisesxponbOnuandher e0v +r authorised, directed and e^r0owne0. in tnr name of Mia corporation, to apply ro BANK for Iht isw+rsee o1 B Of A V i5a bank cartls. and to eeecute auto appleauom and preemenn n BANK may rpuire in oreer to accOmplrs r the loreyomg. R ESD WEO FURTHER, ;oat BANK Is aumonietl t0 Kt upon Mis redutipn until wntlln nplK<Of ro rFOCappn delnoed t0 BANK an0 that Me sutnontY hereby 9ranxd sMll apply with aqud /oru arW affect to the asrttnsors m offrc< Ot M offices named nere~n I Beverly A. Authe let Ziaeeu~yM City Clerk of the City o£ Ranc o Cucamonga, a corpora UOn. mCprpor atld under ;ne aws p' "+! $tit! Of f a 7 i f[irn i n , dp hereby Certdy tha~prr gmnq is a iul~ Dot aid :ones Copv o' a resdb LDn of Me 6mrd 01 Dnecm•s or uid eorponbon, duly and regularly Da an adoD:etl at a me~~ng of ne Boa.tl of Duecmn of xid CorOOrYUOn which wu ODIy and requlnly uIIM and held in all rlspetta ! repd~rlC Dv law. and by the Dy~laws o' x~0 Co•DYiLOn. on Me day of 19_ , et whidr mtetir a major rtY of ;ne Boartl or O~nctos of wd coroor+uon was present aM voted in }Na! of xid redution. I fur;nr cendy Mat xid resobnon n sell in lull force and eHKt and Ms trot D+an amended or reoaed, and Ma Me spec^+en s,gw;ures aopx•~n9 Allow ire the agnatur<s of the offices authorirzd t0 u9n applications +nd agreements for Mis corporation by vnwe o' t^~s resoWnon. IN WITNE55'.1 HE REOF, I na.e nereunta ut my nand a wd SK•etary, and affaed the corporate x+l of uitl corpon tl~on, Mis day of W _ . AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES: saewtrur o • A OpA+peAylp ernr~ r~ ..III ~~~-' " 1 CLIDf POR D1MA06 OR IIIJORL ~J'-(av-ASS G-°"-' • 1. Claim for death, injury to person, or to personal property must be filed no later than 100 days after the occurrence (Cov. Code, Sec. 911.2). 2. Claim for demagea to reel property must be Clled no later than 7 year the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec.,911.2). 111: CITL OP RABC80 COCAtR)ROA 7pmm~/~ RA)~ 3~8 E. Ellpo~e~Cfi9n~u 98~-5~ 3~ Name of Claimant Address Zip Phone Age 3/8 E~EI /no,eadv Cf l~ntAR~~ CAIr-< 9i76~ Addreaa to which Claimant wishaa notices se t. YB~ did damge or SnJury occur? NUY ~ z4 ~ ~ 9gy tIBRgR eta eamage or injury occur?(~~lggl(~ Q t3Y~SCL(Y'te_ BOY and under what circumtancaa did damage or injury occur? ~r.~yn rC t°Y1~4k^\i~dl rr~~ v~ ~~FfPr+SCT ~S C~riVVUJty-ric4, k -F-rrm .1 k~~r 5~lUrrr Q ire.. .inn/L. • MEAT particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the allegee damge or Sn,7ury7 (Include names of employees, if known). ~Ev's he~~~c~enCe Us Yv\are~,is pot hc''~. PRAT sum do you claim? Include the estimted amount oP any prospee Live loss, insofar as St may be known at the time of the presentation oP this claim, together with the basis of computation oP the amount claimed. (Attach estlmtea or bills, if possible). ~_ .Sc' P F~ ~i+Ck1a c4 f M >f Total Amount Claimed: 1 ~ 7 ~ ,~ 7 NAlRL4 and addresses of witnesses, doctors, and hospitals: Ynn.i ~orAa ~nACa.>..arv it rOn ~791~,i"hArv~nr'\Qn G113o GSO- ~ l - X 5 ~1iLr AOMI~ RaTION ~~ -~~1.~.,...a ~~ . '~ Date Signatu f Claimant pan el ryes SD3(478)-RC(N) rf ~~ a ~~ N COPY ~~ . , _.~.. h_..r, 3eef.c rM---- +y. • r„_.<:.~4+C~.G ArnrAl.lw.r~n...~`..~. AN1N•NgN ~ MSOIAOIK IIIII~~N AI{~IIIIN 1. r1RAa1 p uctN3tls1 Nq ~ ~ _ - ~ rA. IttParr A AkWk InwT Crlo.l A6 s -o/ IqA ^eP~rrtY ~~ ~' . AMA.. CaAA. /lIAI e... .~... w<.,,.., t E o ~ a i GN~J,~' ~AN~ clocaAAIPC.A cone -:~r• b ~~ Fp TICN pare w i.l u Irwe1 t NAWIA «.rnrANrm JAN IS ~ w r..p. r«rr;r ANEG I ^~w~ +~~~~ ~A~p,~~a'rp nMlw Mn "t'MO E11MI» DeN: ~k G. DaPldton-P[es/V.Prea/]ssq..... iH tK C OSON AND 3TPRIDS I`iC i1ANL - CiroWal . TrA1 Yatk G, Davldaon-Ptea/V.2tes,~.5~l~Iw1 S i ] +eot3ie E Gmy-Chico. of 3d. /5Cw:kh lda[ .1P?LY e'EE .Z'CEZ PT 1212Q8 a Nww el 141..w Sated LD, 16/Nq olua erv ca A. laalMe N Mwr-Nr..Mr ~tl fawr aee IdL7S Foothill 31vd. Orr wr1 LP Ce1o Cwnr f _ - TOTAA SD,00 t. Alulrrrl AIIdeN Iil dlhrenr kM ll-JJemMr «d AM •1...1 n.. n^r III. Nalnul. G 91]3v N P. Hor.lerr.rer bwn <Mw[M N s lel»r] 10. rrwe re. rM wol9rod eer d Mt peri~wn ei Me AI<dreA Ie•erear Cmrrd M w nvrrl.nm el rbe OrAsNmenl M p ro roe A<r] • t t. t.p.n a ^rtA^ wr.p ro iw.m v p Iv e. e. prwMnM -bnh rben a ewmw pwr a con ePP4<arcwr. 1]. Aql' eAreee !ol rM arty meMyp Nnplgd omwle ~~wmN prmnrr III M.e all Ib gw1iR<wronr el a A<mM. an (bl rM M .ill M .wloro w <wM w pernir ro Yro,.ialeM o•y of Hn pen.•rn. 1 Ae AlwMeli< 4.erege <amrN AN, U. ArArf W CAtIAOM4 Ceu.ry el _.5;1:i..i.:SLuJ(II.J ............. Den...._._1-11.2._..__.. ...•~ ~r YMS M r.T .rI w w M •' ti,~ro w~ • Y.nFnw~iO~i wM+w•n 4<. _ ~ Ar.• ~ +~He~ ~~ ^ r.r .n~ .~.n ". .. nrwin.~ y w.~. .. ~ i~ .. ~M •r~i < .iwwr .r ~.wrrwv J .re•~n n: r .r ..nx....~ w... •n nwr w ,n.n ..n i ~M•M. IV AINIC~Nr 5~>< ZNC. _ ~'~;~"r SIGN N!A! 1l7/:n.JC .....:........ ~~i ..___.._~~~.cAA=f.~• ~ ~. _ _ S~ ......_._.. AMlKAT10N ~I TtANlRAW IA. SLAT! a CALIAOANIA Cwmry d__.SAI1.3[.1::YipL:1...._,..___.OM ............................ Y.Y..wr•r w .rn ew. ~wr w.. .. .4^ .r n.nJ n wn r.~.. innrw .m4+•w, M ..r.~. , .r~nl 4 yrw Mn h wnM~ .i ~r.M M<. r^.w ~ ..~<M.. ~nr^, w.n..<M•.^h M rI.J^r M +n"~ ~4.q ..~.n~~~••r rn nlww~ M1 wr .nMw I~ r ~.Nn. M m~ . M M i n M wM+nr _•M.n .r'n•L ~~. ~ M 4n.n ..A n •.M••n ~.e•mr n h eF~~` ^ blrt.aL M M...__._.__lM1 M ............................. Dike ur..__......,.,....MtN11 Na .....,...........,.. .re r,...M I~. .L~w.. w.. ID1ga Poothf 11 rtA Ve.. Pa .!.., r........,..N 1r°~ eD _ a.M D^AW IOfiAIN Qv Nw Avra, wlor 1'A4 Llnrl For UtroNrat*J t/w QJP •n..k.di q Ae<erdN rwaw. ^ rNrrNVrl AtPrrA .: CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA~IONGA STAFF REPORT OATS: February 6, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubhs, City Engineer 8Y: 3arrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer c~~ .,~~' ~~ ., x ~~~~ ~„-- SUBJECT: Ropr ov al of Reimbursement - Lien Agreement with the °.n Aa aae Fellowship to construe a portion of Nineteenth Street at 9er v~ Street in conjunction with the Bervl-Hellman Storm Ora n. Amount of Agreement 513,020.70. • The En Rgaoe Fe ll owsh io has applied for a building permit to make an addition to Lheir facility at the southeast corner of Beryl Avenue and 19th Street. As a contlition of the permit, Lhey are required to install missing street improvements on 19th Street. Tho 3eryl-Hellman Avenue Storm Orain Project is under construction immediate'v adj zc ent to their sit=, therefore, it hr.d been suggested that the ~C itv contractor complete the En Aq ape improvements as a change order to the r+rv pro ier . En Agape has agreed to the general conc~gt but has asked iv ;t ~wo~i~~l be fe asi6le to reimburse the cost to the City over a five-ve ar period. The cost of the improvements is estimated to 6e 513,020.80. An Agreement has been forwarded to En Agape st at;no that the ^itv is will ina to consider the construction of the improvements with the understand+nq that the costs will be reimbursed over a five-year period in six equal payments, the first being due within 30 days, interest at 10; per year on the unpaid balance will be charged. The reimhursement is to be secured by a Lien on the property. A copy of the Agreement is attached for your consideration, RECOMIERDATION Recommend ao proval of the Agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same. J Res ectful~~ G ii / ~ J LBH: ®H:jaa Attachment ~ ~u ,~ En Aagpe Fellowship 9101 Nineteenth Street Alta Loma. Calif. 91701 U.S.A. (714) 987-1275 tl ~ r January e, (9S5 Mr. Lloyd Rubbs City Engineer 9320 Baseline ftd. Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Ifu bbs, CL'Y Ci BAYCHO CCCAAfOf:Cd In regards co m conversation wiCh you, and yours with B111 Mann and dssoc iaees, we at En Agape Fellowship £e-1 [hat we should not be herd total ly :espo::s i61e for improvements to the wafer line and the mov in, of the [elaphone pole at 19c'r. and 3eryl. re see the city's w1111ngr.e ss to help us br i:,g this siCUation to a close and we feel [hat having this work done by Riverside Construc- tion Co. would eapidite this matter in the most cost efficient way possiSle. We understand that this would be done under provisions that Ghe city would allow for a 5 year period of time to hr ing this financial respo nsibil icy to a conclusion (due and payable in 5 yrs.) Shank you for your coorperation and insight. Please contact me with any questions concerning [his matter. Cod bless you. Yours uly, Michael Sohnson En Agape Fello~.: sh i7 11.1/cib Pastor Harold Dewberry )K~' J . RECORDIM6 RERUESTEO 0Y: and YNEN RECORDED NAIL T0; CITY ELERK C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMOtIGA D, 0. Bow 80y RANCHO CU CA NOY GA, LALIFOq 4IA 91730 STREET FgONTA6E CONSiRUCTIOR REINDURSENEN7 A6REENERi SECURED 0Y REAL PROPERTY ITEM A6REEMERi THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into tht5 day I of 1995, Dy and between En Agape I F<110wship Inereindtter ref errlD t0 as "Oe ve70De r"), and the CITY I DF RANCHO LULA NONGA, CAL FORMA, a municipal eorpOr atlan iher clod Rer relerred tp as "City";, provides as follows: NHEq EAS, ai a general condition precedene to [he issw once of a building permit i0r ;~e En Agape FellowsNtp • development the City re dvires the cans t, uctt9n Of misting off- site street fmprOVemens alony 19th :reel ad)a<ent to the property to De developed; dnd NXERE AS, the Developer Desires that ine C1ty construct said 7mDravements to co n)pnction wfth Cify's pro)ect as deicri oed in Eantolt "A" I9 th Street Improvements STA 022 to 1a25 City Oranf ng No. 917. NHEREA S, ene Developer Deslref tD postpone payment tD C1ty for costs o1 sucn 5mprpvemen [s un ell a later date, es det ermined by the Etty; and MM ER EAS, Che Clty is agreeable tp Such p05[pon errant provided that tna Oevela per en eers Into this Agreement redo lrfn9 the Developer to make said payments, 1f the Developer N17S or neglects to da so and toot the Ctty shall Mve a Itee upon to • real property meref nal ter Devtloptr's Darf ormance. described at tecmrlty for ~~ I F~ 1 r N041, ?FERi FORT, '4E cG0.T:ES FGdc • 1. The ~1ty wl ~~, i[ :i [Y~d Own a%pens° fJ!n'Sh dl' l acor, efiui o.*on; anC ~a :e•~31, and eaj all costs 'wide^~: :] :n. ~ns: a:la:•on in accD•canc? .,.! >1 d-.; ~ soen` ,..~:•s a]c•cvee by Che .i ty Eny', n eer pf ;he ."Y :he frontage impr:': e'-en;s des;r:beC in ;xF.~]i: n 3:^ng :ne street ad; p:n~ny tho parc=ls o' lane describes 'n ~x`.~ti; ". . $. .n5;a1'3:i :^ Of sdld `YCn[d:o j-J•]:^-e •,t ah3~1 be C]*D ieCeE d: the edge :.me d5 [ne inG•:VeTRn:i `.r .i tY'S p•Cje:: uESCribed 3bav? are Cp'p'ie:eE. 3. pevolDper hereby agrees tD re: mbu•se Ci :y an amount ., des:riEetl in Exniptt "C hereto. Said ameun[s are based upcn 3^ eSt inld [e ]( :05; whi C!I is 3'd b]e:; t0 Ch do ge EaSeC uDOn dC tU dl .. .s incur^ed to complete the w:•k. Oevel cDer shat: pay tD Li ty • . tats' i~:ant ,n sir eDOal ~rsta:laen is each sae ana DaY ib L• tlithin a .i T.e `rd-e frO,T Che :dte O( :he exECJ:19n Of [hts 0. gre emen :, :he srs[ ins:3!1me^: wi[iin 30 days, each suCcessi v^ ipst dil Tent Mt thin One-year 1nC•omoq (5, dOC t!Ip '"d5t tl1[g1n /1Ve y23r s. In dCdit:On, lnle•es; On ChE unDd1C bdldn.•e Slld l: ,1o pold a2 d rdte Of tJn pe' ye 3'. d. To SeCUro the pe rf prm ante by [Ee Oe velope• of [h[ terms and candid ons of this Agreemen [, the Oevet oper does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City, in trust, fne prppe•[y descr'. bee to `%F.i b,; "8". 5. This conveyance is to trust far the purposes desc •+hed abase. 6. Now, there/ore, if [he ~eveioDer shall faithfully perform atl pl the acts and things tD be done under this • Agreement, then this conveyance shall be vD{d, of herwtse, it shall remain in full force and of (ect and to all ref pecis shall 2 .:7 • be consi EereE anE :r eateE as a mortgage on :.._ ._' prope•:Y 3^.. the ri 9nts anE oollgi:ians of the Da•:ies nu ~ re<pee: ;F¢r=:p shall be governeC by the previ 5'. pn5 of tie :~~ :oae of ;ve $t 3;e Of :dl if 9r^13, dnE 3nY Cane' 3p:" C3a1a 5:3;.;?, p?";3'r' f tp Cpr:gdge5 On 'edl :rJJe•:%. :. h15 a -. _.,• ShL'~ _. .'n!Ins Cpe^, _,. a'n a' to M¢ bere`i: of the Heirs, exe:u:ors, aE~ri••.s:'3t;rz, S.C:?$$a^s inE 3iS1 Cry ]f eaC^, .,_ ]L•:laS "_ .... 9. ~~ ..,_ _.:ent -e T; _. .. 9'. ve ,f+ect .r lz Ag•eeaent as a nor gage, the tern "Ceve~ope•" sna'1 be "mo ^. ga 9or" anE :ne [i!y shall be cee "aor:gagee" as tno s¢ :e'ns are .se] in a? :,_ _~+ :oG¢ Cf :he <;i:e of ~a"`c rria 3nJ any C;h^^ St3:C:a por. a. r'ry :. -ar :ga.+S ]n rn3'~ ~rOpe`:J. • .. :1 'egal iL:'~:n 'S :. _"Ce] :. ?nf 3r.e 3") :. Me prn vl5i 0.r5 Of [r •5 ngreerenL, :0 _ •+,r dny $v wniC+ the :I:y is en:i tl eo t; re:a v¢• fron tr? uev el Boer ne-eunEe• a' to fb recto se the ro rtga?¢ cre3:eE nere:y. then the prevai'r ag pa'!y mall be en:1 ;'eE to recover i[s rsts ar. suce reasonable at[cr^ey5 f¢es as snail be awarded by tte :c yra, 7 w :N niTYEOS BhEREJF, the parties he^e :a have .e_,+... [biz Agreement on the day and year `first ahoy nr ::e^. LITT DEVELOPER :TY OF BAN:F.O C'J :A Y9'i G4, C, IFC a ..n.., c.a', corpcr~aa do BY Jon _ „ Maps ni'. Ei-: seve-.Y _~_. Ci :yn 'en ...........................wn....,......,...... ,............... STAiE OF LAL IF ORNIA ss LL'JY iY OF SAN 9EB.`IARL IY07 On ,'c_,be`pre JnCe-slTn2a iYC:I^y LJit:, per50ndilf dpp°.3re: u a^~ 3E'iE RLY A. Auri,E'_E7 personally known td me tc be :he ~wayo• • [i0Y Llerk, r@soe^tively, ;~ ,he .:TY OF RAY:hJ :JCANUYuA. :FOnN:a, a mun~n oal corpcra:~en, and known r,e to be the Pea do w~p e.ec.[e, :ne w: ;a~^ ins:rumen[ c, ~be~a1` a1 said ci pal ce rppr atldn, and acknc.'ed ged to me tna; Bach n., nicipal coryra:ipn eaecu :ee i,. N;T'iE SS 4V dAYJ A':0 pFF:::AL SEAL. N c:ary 5 y, iture BTd TE OF LAL IF03NIA ) SS COUN7Y OF SAN BERYdR 01'i0) On this [he day, of before me, the anders~9n e0 NO[ary ub :C per5dna. f dppedr¢c pe^s ona~ y ono wn to me proved co me an roe basis d1 satisfactory eviden Ce [o he Me person(s) whose namels) sub5crl bed [d the i!hin inS Vumen[ and ackndwl ¢ged tha: ¢aecu[ed f[. N::liE 55 MY HANG ANJ OFFICIAL SEAL. Notary tgna[ere NOTF: NNEM OOC UME NT IS FAECUTEO BY N LORPORIIT LOX OR PNRT NE0.THI P, • THE NBOYE 11CNNONLE DGEMENT IS NOT ~CCE Pi~BLE. A COR POR11i ION /P0. N NEE DGE ME NT IS REQUIRE O. a `i~~ ~ ~ ~/ ezxlecr •e• Prop<rty loc ate< st soutne as: comer pf Igtn Street and 9ery1 Avenue (APN 202-Gal-ai), lagatly Eescr+neC as: .he Nprth one-nalf of Me Yes: op^-~~aH of Lot 2, dio Ce :2 0/ .uc aeon ga Hpnes:<aa Aztoc'atten .~ :ne .:i :y of ian cno Cuca-or;a, Cpunty o/ $an dernar ^_ino, 5[a:e of ]a!rfernia as Fer naP f~~:eC +n Cap BpoR 6, page :6 in Me Bffica of the Ceunty deC pr~tr pf saiC Cp only. J )~~~ ezx535r •~• • 1, gpadvay Eac av aLion 2. B' curE 6 2a^ gutter 3. a• Class IS Ease 4, gelocate stop sign 5, xate• Bain enc aslment 6. 6" :nick qL pavivg ), gd~ust water valve 9. getpcat! H•! hvfrani 9. qe locate str!!t i+gnt i0. Sidewati 60 cy ? 510.00/ ' 5600,00 170 1! a S10/i' ~ 51,700.00 BO tons a 525/ton 52,:00.70 1 lath ? 525/!a 525.70 Lump Sua - 51,750.79 90 tp-s ? 532.50!b n. 32,925.97 1 each ? 535/ea 535.70 1 !a<n 0 51,'.00 ~!a ' 51,500.77 3 earn ? 5600 Na = 5600.07 lOZi s` a 51.70/s` 5'..7'5.'^ Si. epu sl payments o7 52,717,36 eacn • • 6 ~ ~~~ • • CITY OF RAtiCHO CCCAMOtiGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 5, 1985 " T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, Lity Engineer BY: Barhara Kral 1, Engineering Technician ~~cn.uo~ <'~~~~~. \`~ x r ,~ .; Z - ~4~ F 1 ~u-- SUBJECT: Approval of An Agreement for the Preparation of C.C.&R.s wi*.h R ichwood Development as a prerequisite for further approvals of Tract 12621 locatzd at the south side of Arrow Highway be cween 8 ak er and Mad rune Aven ue5 The Final Map of Tract No. 12621 was approved by City Council on February 6, 1985. The required G.C.&R.s are under preparation and were not completed in time for agenda preparation. An Agreement to guarantee completion was entered into by the Developer it conformance with standards and conditions established and acceptable to the C+ty Attorney. Normally, the recur daticn of L.L.&R.s is made at the time of approval of the Department of Real Estate Report prior to occupancy of a project. Therefore, a delay in recordation would not affect the final map approval. However, arrangement of the attached agreement was advisable to relieve potential loss of funds and approval of the project. RECONlENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Agreement for Preparation of C.C.&R.s for Tract No. 12621. R e~pe ctf idly sutyhitt ed, LBN: ~K:jaa Attachment ~e~ RECD P.C ED RECC ESTED Et' AVD NHES RECORDED RET CRF TJp City Clerk, City eE Rancho Cucamonga AG P.E E`:EtiT THIE ACA EE°ES: is entered into [his day of 1935 end is to be eEfec Live that dace, regaivess of cne ca :a o. axe cation heceoE, and is by and De cween the Ca ty of Aancho Cucamonga, a municipal corpora cion (heceinaf ter some tines referred to as "City') entl Richwood Deve Lopmenc Corpus :LOr. (nereinaE ter sometimes [ef erred co as "Ce valoper j. NHER E05, Deve Lo per has purchased or will purcl:a se appnx- irotely eight acres, more or less, iota cad genera Gy wester ly of 4.c rone Avenue and southerly of Arrow riigr.way, Want ru Cucamonga l:ne "Projec c'), and • NHEA EAS, Deve io per has processed and received ~n to Live approval Erom 'he City Eor a <oc.r cn in latest sub"_tvssion consis ctng of 90 units or lots ant roc ious re ¢ea aonal areas, open space and private scree cs in the Project; ana NHEREAE, in connection with tents rive aoprs vat by the City, [he City has cents r. re ly apps vac a cca<c vap Eor Irac[ Yo. L2621 and site plan (5/A) to aliou a planned unit deve to pr..en t; and NN EREAS, a[ the time of recordation of the final tract sap for Tract 12fi 21, i[ Ls anticipated that De velaper will be the owner of the Project ; and NH EREdS, as a candi ti on pre cadent to approval of the tentative tract map antl stce plan, the ci ey tae mad< certain conditions and re quiremen a regarding recordation of Covenants, Conditions end Res ¢is bona (hereinafter sometimes referred co as "CC6R s) to be recorded wi ch the said final map vhi ch may incorporate certain epee Sal building features to ba provided 6y Deve LO per in the Project; end NHEREAS, ehe Elnal tract map Eor Tract 12621 must be re carded as soon as passible to alloy commencement of conscruc ti on of the Project{ and NHEREAE, Developer desires to record the final tact map Ear Tract 40. 12fi 2I without concurrent records cion of the CC6R's because review of the CC6R s by the Ca llfornia DePar tment of Aeai Es ca to (hereinafter some times referred to as "DRE ) vi1L most certainly resat[ in re qu iced chan3es to sand CC60.'s but vi L1 not be accomplished petoe to the re quea led dace for racarda cion of [he EinaL Irac[ map Ear tract 12621; end • I~J • ti F:ER EAS, City and -eve lope: dest:e m ?n txr into ehis Agr_exe nt [c provide assurance m the CiN eha; o0 occupancv permit for a har..e, mvnhouse or con dominiu^. ;n :ne ?:u'ec: vi11 be issued until a set of CC6 R's has been approved by and acce peed by the Ciey and recorded and tF.a: J?ve iaper vi': not re ce r+e Einal hookuo of perv nent utilities to the units u: 'ro nes be Eore re cor'a don o: said CCik's app ro rxd Sy :he C , , SC':, :4EREF+RE, ;he pat c.es ._-_:~ ag; _ as .r...as: 3. Prior to any obLi3a uen on ;'ne par: n City :o issue occupancy ox rmtts Ear the ?rojec; m b=_ coast: vc ;ad in accorcance ~ v"h fins l Iract :',ap L3631 and site plan ~S/A. or w alloy :he pe r..a vent hookcp of pe raanen: uu L; t:xs [o :he ums or he acs i -aid T:ac t, uevxi:oer vi11 deposes vi :'n C a sxt of proposed ' - CZS R s, and viL1 cec t:Ey m City these ;he ~ R's so deposited have e ceived D'nE apprava 1. Fur:her, sa:d C - cast 'oe a ce pets bLe t u a approved by :. ri end its legal coup sei end c=_corded prior to ~ ]: c+ s oblt.a et on ;o Issue occucancy pe c-.:;e a perm is far ' utill ty n oo hups for cne Project. 2. She said CLs A's vi L1 tncorpo:acx :hx: e:o any spacial conditia ns or recui;e~encs which have teen re GU:r?d by the City o: as Planning Coe: fission ar City Co u.:ci1. 3. IE, aECer re Gorda ciao of [he Eival teat: map Eor Tract 12531, then is a request to r wart the ?rojec[ to octets 3e or aeuest by Developer or ar.y successor io in Gets: to re subd ivide ...^ grope ry, this A3reeaenc via be cancelled and term.i na led by -,cording adecu^.ent :o char eff?ct executed by :he City and . ~:e Soper or L_ve Taper s successor in interest as a condition cadent eo such :-version co acreage or approval of a di EE_renc 'eject or subdivision an the sub ~ea pro Pe r:y. Once CC6R's _::a Eac tor-: to the C~r: and ape r:red by the DP.E sha 1L have been ~ • <ce iced by the City Eor reco:a i ;:an and rata rde d, the Ci [;~ and Jevx to per or its success a: in it "rest shall esewte and record a document dec Tae: r., [hoc the con.:.:ons of [ais Agree r..ent have be_n sa cisfi?d anL tr.a: tnis A3:eeme:r, a nu 1l, ve id, canceiled, and of no Eur c'ner Eorce ant eEEec :. FIIERE E:RE, this Ag;s?.: ant a ca_cu tad the day and year Eirst above vri::e n. -E~'E L-PE d' v' .. cow .n :.--.~n~~' ,'. ~.:. ;E RdS C'r.: :: CA:IJ\GA r / I~ // h re s:aen• j Ilayar o: ;ne Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga BY: Secretary ATTEST: Ci q' er~Cl ~t of the C{ty eE Rancho Cucamonga s.,~E ~~. _ . • ~ „ -<. _ ~ E ~ ~ d~ ~G ~r < . a _ a .3. _. ~re ,.< __ 4~ 8 - .<o,ooa ..mats .n ~-'Faa•aro 1 '. ~ vt . o.,,..,i o„~ -"~^' iironnie . Po n • .,e.w o ... o. a~n eona me~:.co p WifNE SS m, n.n0.n0 one~.i,.e , i.n 7, 11tl est. ~ ~- ~ RESOLUTION N0. -€G2-~66-~6R ~- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH RICH'WOOD DEVELOPMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL DF C.C. &R.5 FOR TRACT N0. 12621 WHEREAS, the tentative Map of Tract No. 12621, consisting of 93 lots, submitted by Richwood Development, Subdivider, located on the south side of Arrow Highway between Madrone and Baker Av'en ues was conditionally approved to prepare Covenants, Conditions and Resolutions (C.C.&R'S) in compliance with standards established by the City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements as a prerequisite to approval of occupancy of the proposed development said subdivider has entered iota an agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City. NO'W, THEREFORE, BE IT R"e SOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cat if ornia as follows: That said agreement he and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Cterk is authorized to attest thereto and cause same to be recorded upon said execution. • PASSED, APPROV E7, and ADOPTED this 6th day ?f February, 198E. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City C erk jaa '' • CITY OF Rd\CHO CtiCASIO~GA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 6, 1985 TD: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 3. HubbS, City Engineer S'J B,IECT: Day Creek Community Facilities District 94-1 GL CA.\ipt, t~,~ Y s~;\7 x _ ~~, z _ > to Attached for Council action are the initial steps required to complete the Day Creek Community Fac;lit ies District. These action include: o Adoption of Resolution authorizing the issuance of bonds. 0 4uthorization of F. Mackensie Brown to file the necessarv court action to validate the District formation, o Aparoval of Agreement with Wilidan Associates to prepare the final District Maos, Ledgers and necessary Assessor's Computer Tapes and Records to levee the first ve ars's tax. o Agreement with F. '•!ackens ie Brown, tnc. to act as Band Counsel in the District process an; final bond sales. This Agreement includes provisions to terminate the ex'sting Agreement with the now defunct firm of Brown and Nazarek. Staff wilt be scheduling a work Shop with the founr_il fo review in depth the necessary contractur al arrangements and staffing required to comoiete the Dav Creek program. We currentiy contemol ate that the project will be built in two phases with the first phase to begin construction in the Sor ing of 1986. To meet this schedule, design contracts will need to he executed soon and st affnq provided for adequate coordination. These issues will be explored in more detail at the proposed workshop. Day Creek is an overall E32 million oroj ect of which over 523 million will he funded through the Mello-Roos District and 0.edev eiooment Aqencv. We recommend the City begin this unusually challenging project. RECQMEN~ATION Recommend adoption of the Resolution authorizing the issuance of Certain Bonds to Finance Facilities in a Conmtunity Facilities District and anorove contracts with 'dil ldan Associates to complete Financial Administrative Services and F. Mackensie Brown, Inc. to act as Bond Counsel for the District. Respectfuli sub~ytted, `CBM~a fV ~- SPq rel C9'JYSS aG°rswcy Tw(E gGREEMEVf is mane ere entlreE ,nto to is eav or I9RE, oy ane 0liween the CITY OF RAV CyO :JC.tMDY'uA-!~ IF~RV:n, e~pu T+^c ca ro cratien (ne •¢`nafter referree IO es "C rty"J, fne F, K4LKENZiE 9R^. N4, I4L. lnerei r.af[er referreE to es 'COUnzet"). NDN, THE°EFDAE, IT IS NER E?v RGd EE7 nv and De tw!e^ the oa rt les ne re to as follows: SEC IDN I. Tn a[ Counsel sna[1 xrr orm leml se rv i,s in eonne:[ron win Ue or opas!s pro:eeo, nos retatrpR to the formation or a Lomrw i:y FacillHes D'stria, ina aei ng ane re la[!c Bona +sspe,4e, fn the matte of a Dr DDeseE Lamxu- nlty ra. 11[1!5 :IS[fia known dnE el Sl On et ee as CDMN'J41TV Fa[IL IT IES D;G`°;R ND. 94_I (ppr CAE EK O+R: NA GE SY STEMI (ner. inarter refenep to as the "Dtstri;["I pneer MoceeO`nas :ofM Uaee Dun ae n: to the provisions or the "mel to-°p os Comman+ty Fati !; [f es 5a N 19:2", Oe inR Cnao ter t.S, Pert 1, Din sio^ 2, Ti tl< 5 of tM Government Coca of the St re or Lali Porn+a. Saip sern.eS in ell in<1 upl: • a. Pr20erdS10n Dr ell rlSOl~:i Jn2, n0[ias, :Dn: r a:[5, eprE rC rmi, n[ner pd'Jl rf anE EO:vm¢pts reDU`ree `n tnp DrOa 9C np5: 9, E+am: nation of [ne pro:e¢a'^pi, step !y st¢o, as taken: ,. ADPe er at all nl arlnRS ur Eer Me Dr p:l eEi nR S, enc eaenE any mpltlne where at tenaan:e is recu+reE; D. Ae rr .w ine "Report^ of the Eng~ne!r as it reta:ez to [n! pr o:eeE; npS for [ne Dis[r i;r E. Aer'ew ane aami ne the map snow`np the area era nounoarl es of the D; aria; F. Review [he ne tnce ane formate ut `IiieO Oy the Engineer for [ne aDpO r[10nm!nt OI ine SD[C1 a1 [ar; G. Make re:omne hoar ions as to sate oI Conei, as rep vlreE: N, Asf ist in dny 11 e:LlOn pr O:M V'¢ OrJaSSi np, e5 OK¢Siary inO lOr r lp vi rle: I. In s;r~a ion ane aari;.e in ce^ne ct'on wi to any ar the fore9ot ne: 1, Issua+c° ar an aoorovi no L•eei oo`n'o~ att!sr ne w the ve ME'b ? tn¢ pr p;¢!Elnps an, tee issuance pr the porws; v, 4ny ane ai! c:ner astomarv Dr p:e¢E+ncs rel atlnc_ to tn! formation of the Ts:na enp the tssuan:e o! ecnc s. Su:n le ea! sern:es sn e!1 hat ina u0e env sl rvl:ei in conne:t ion with tnt ea u`s`t'on, ny !esemen[ or <onEemvtl-on, of any leseml nts or D[ne• f ntnreu fn rear oraoerty necessary fpr the proposee impr ov¢ments. Tnes~ servi:es :an ce Drpv lDee uy Counsel, oy seoerdte agreemem, ff aesireo~ t. ~~ `~ .t ~~ . • SECTION 2. IDe[ [ne City shall pe Aprm as f.l :ows: 4, Furnish to CCUnSeI fu:n mep s, rK Or]s. [R'e seer;n ei, anC p[+<r dp:u- iaent3 apC pr p:eep'n05, pr Ce ri iltee ip0`e5 [ne re0/, a5 ne;a55ary, B. DEY to Cpuniel a 4e :pmp uteC on the erount Of ed;n Eone 15 sae, if im re in en ane, as Pollo4s: ONE-NA;F OF ONE vERCENT (1/25) on the Itrit fID,000,00^.; ONE-O'JADT ED [f ONE DER[EN? (1/eSl Irom 510,000, 001 to 127, OOO,n00; ONE-Ei (N TV OF ONE DERCENT (1/R51 on the Oelen:e. S EC'ION 3. Tire lees sxci li ee in Sett ion 2 above de hat in;tope any se rv i;es in con- neC[+pn Vito N< e:OU+si Lion, Ey con;reC pr ;Ondemnatf on, pI any edSements pf pi her prppe rty neCe55arr for the iistr t;[, Or dny Se rv lte5 i ;ann e;tlpn wr to any pr OCeedinpa fdr validd[i0n o/ any pr O:e<^. `nds pr in :onne;[ipp with dny Other 11 [1gat10n, A[ [hE rEpueit pf in! Llty, Lpunsel V;11 repfeSlpt rt in dny p[nV maiteri r<I dt •np [p sd"J pfpll;[, 1nC1uC'np, Eu[ ^pt lm't<a ip, LnE /p 11o4r nU: A. Environme n[a! pra;<mtnv s: B. 4;pu15f [ion Of pr pp<rty py nep0[':[rpn Or :oMenm d[rp^: C. Li naat+on cnellendtnq the valad'ty or [n< or p:e eC'nps: C. Na'i ea ti on of oro:e<prnps. • Counsel ws ll xrform any or :we a0 pve sere+: es at a^ nvur'y ran [' mu[u d'ly dCre<C uCpn U<f Cre my wp rk +s aC[ua'.ly p<ra arme9, ane :Ob apes enr [n at en aareemen: wcula pe prpvr pep Por eny urv'.:es xs'rm tf va'tpe H On oro:eedinps sre inir a[eC, Lne E<e for scrip va li net ron o ro:eedinas snarl not ea:eeC 5',000..9, p!us :psis in:urr e]. S EC'UN a, n [he event the prpteep5nas s^< ter.~na'^e or de andpne< dr for :o me sa'e Ci opras other vppn CCnc lus'pr pf the pud'~1: neon nv pr uopn tqe wn;lu- St0^ pf Lne <lea iCn, Lppn S<1 Sndll R 9d'] a re dspn a!le f« /pr sE rV l:ee ren;ereC to ed to Oes<p uoon a hourly rate pf Sgn.OC per np ur, not to ea:eed s T, sce. no. SECT I7N S. Counsel nerMy slates tDei R goes not represent ;1; ents wiro adverse in V--rests :p the City az it relates [o the lssuan;e oral ya le M ine Nonas ldr /l~anp nq M1s Diitr is t. SECTION 6, in ar this Fore.,4 nt mey x urmina;ep Dv either party ne re to Cy mat inp wn;ten net ¢E the rent to Ue Jl her pe rty, IN NITNESS N`!Ev `OF, the pa't'es hereto nave ;cruse^. [n is Adreemen: tc x ere;uted pn the day ane year ris; ne re rna)pve rrt Rte n. ^'VrJF A4Y CN0 CCC 4w7Nu4 Bv' ~.y 7E DeN •vC CL':4°JVi4 F.. E... 1•rE OF :4tf0DV:4 C; + CI•v DF-RAV Li9 C'K W9Via $?AiE OF CFL ;FCD V:F • °COBMSEL" F. FIa CK EN 2IE B90NA, INC. By: AGREEMENT • for FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DAV CREEK COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT THIS AGREEM1tENT, made and entered into this day of 1985, between She CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON- GA, a AtuniGpal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and WILL- DAN ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, CITY has formed Community Facilities District No. 84-1, known as the Day Creek Drainage System, in accordance with the Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982; and WHEREAS, said Community Facilities District has been duly ap- proved by the electors?e within rts boundaries; and WHEREAS, CIT1 wishes to implement the program of financing and • constructing drainage Facilities as set forth in ENGINEER's Tax Appor- tionment Report used for implementing the District; and WHEREAS, ENGINEER is familiar with the program and proceedings which have led to the establishment of this financing program 4or drain- age facilities. that: NOW, THEREFORE, it iz hereby agreed by and between the parties 1. DEFINITIONS. As used in this Agreement, the following definitions shall be applicable: a. Consultant. Consultant shall mean Willdan Associates, a California Corporation located at 290 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805. b. City. City shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation, located at 9320 Base Line Road, Swte C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, c. City Council. City Council shall moan the City Couneil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, d. Services. Services shall mean the services to be performed by the Consultant pursuant to this • Agreement. e. Satisfactory. Satisfactory shall mean satisfactory to the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform for, and Furnish to, The Lity the services described in Exhibit A, "Scope of Services" attached hereto. 3. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. The consultant agrees that it shall dil)gently and responsibly pursue the performance of the services required of it by this Agreement. If a delay beyond the control of the Consultant is encountered, a time extension may be mutually agreed upon in writing by the City and the Consultant. The Consultant shall present documentation satisfactory to the Gity to substantute any request for a time extension. 4. PA Vh1ENT. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, upon completion of the authorized services described in the "SCOPE OF SERVICES". (Exhibit A), the Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with the payment schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B, but shall not exceed a total amount of 521,500 without additional au- thorizatwn. • Since the amount of work effort to complete the various elements of the overall program will vary, it is proposed that our services be provid- ed on an hourly cost basis with a budget limitation, Monthly invoices will be submitted for work completed during the preceding month based on salary cost times a multiplier of 2.6. In the event of authorization, in writing, by the City, of changes from the work as indicated in Exhibit A or for other written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated herein, additional compen- sation shall be allowed for such extra work based upon the actual salary costs times the multiplier with a not-to-exceed budget limitation for the extra work. The Consultant shall submit invoices which specify the area where work was completed and the associated time for completion to the City for approval, The Consultant agrees to invoice the City for services ren- dered not more often than once a month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) calendar days following submittal of an invoice to City by Consultant for oath completed task. Work performed at the request of the City, outside the limit specified in this Agreement, is to ba dasignat- ed as "Extra Work" on monthly invoices. Work parformad in connection with an authorized written change order will be so designated an said in- • voice. Ili 5. CITY SUPPORT. The City shall provide the following items • of support to the Consultant: a. Provide a staff engineer to work with the Consultant for the purpose of giving advice and to provide co- ordination within the scope of this Agreement. Make evadable and provide all existing data and in- formation relevant to the proposed Project. 6. SUSPENSION, TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEh1ENT. The C+ty may, at any time, suspend, termr nate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least fifteen (15) days prior to written notice. 'Upon receipt of said nonce, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work un- der this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thir- ty-five (35) days of service of said notice, the City shall pay to the Con- sultant all earned and unpaid fees and costs, but the sum sa paid shall not exceed a dollar figure which bears the same proportionate relationship to S?7,500 as the quantity of work completed by the consultant, bears to 100: of the work prescribed herein. If the City susaends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement, such suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. • 7. BREACH OF CONTRACT. If the Consultant defaults in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this agreement, it shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of written notice of such default in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of Yime, the Gty shall have the right, notwithstanding any other pro- vision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further no- tice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be enti- tled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agree- ment shall become the sole property of She City. The City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant against all damages, claims, and losses, including defense costs, arising out of any reuse of the docu- ments as said documents are considered instruments of services performed pursuant to this Agreement. 9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Nei- • ther the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have con- ~~ trol over the conduct of the Con sultanf or any of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The Consul- . tant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. 10. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep it- self informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which to the best of its knowledge, information and belief may in any manner affect those employed by it or may in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, its officers and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 11. ASSIGWIENT. The Consultant shall not assign the perfor- mance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any moneys due hereunder, without the prior written consent of Lhe City. 1?. INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain general liability and workers compensation insurance [overage effective on the first day of work and in full force throughout the full term of this Agreement. The policy or polies shall be underwritten by msu rers admitted to operate in the State of California. on forms no less broad m the scope of coverage than standard forms. Entire limits of habilKy maintained must be certified but in no event shall limits 6e less than spenfied herein below. Coverage Minimum Limit Workers Compensation 6 Employer's Liability E 100,000 Comprehensive General Liability/Comprehensive E1 ,000, 000 Auto Liability each occurance and aggregate If requested, the Consultant agrees to deposit with the City, cer- tificates of insurance to satisfy the City that insurance requirements of this Agreement have been complied with, and to keep such insurance in effect and the certificates therefore on deposit with the City during the entire term of this Agreement. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT, This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto and supersede all ne- gotiations and prior writing in respect to the Subject matter hereof. • • 4 In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions or pro- visions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the • terms and conditwns of this Agreement shall prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agree- ment to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO ClCA110VGA WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 'r ~- Jon D. Mikels, Mayor William Stookey ~ ~i Date: Date: ' .~~ +! - ATTEST: By: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FOR11: ~f/~~ '~9 Attorney . j~.n f~(SYei<r i 5 %' EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES ENGINEER shall provide services necessary for the implementation and ad- ministration of the financing and taxing provisions of Community FacihLes Distnd No. &1-1. These services shall consist of the following: Proles LOn of Maximum Tax Ra[e and Sale of Bonds ENGINEER shall partiupate m the development of a construction schedule consistent with the needs of CITY. ?. With The assistance of the financial consultant or bond underwriter appointed by CITY for the projecT. ENGINEER shall review points of bond sales and amou rats with the objective of; .. Minimizing the tax to 6e levied m the jmtial stages of the project. 6. Minimjnng the maximum tau rate. • c. Prepare a projected rate of the Special Tax during the life of the Catnct. • II. Taxmo Administration Prepare a map and ledger for acmenistering the Special Tax. The map shall identify all taxable parcels and shall identify all non-taxable parcels which were excluded 6y reason of the forma- tion proceedings. A ledger shall be prepared keying the parcels to the map, setting forth their area, and establishjng their basis for the Special Taz. 2. A review will be conducted covering the distribution of the parcels within the Community Facjlities Distract. The parcel ownerships and acreage for each will be updated. 3. Cnvrdmation will be majntamed with the Assessor's office to facili- tate their incorporation of the Special Tax with the regularly scheduled County tax collection. 4, A computer program will be prepared adaptable to the hardware of the San Bernardino County Tax Collector and, when the amounts of the Special Tax are Cetermined, they will be included thereon with timely transmittal Yo the Tax Collector upon receipt of appro- priate CITY approvals. 6 '~~ lII. Apportwnments • 1. As divisions of land occur, ENGINEER shall apporUOn the Special Tax in accordance with the provisions of the ENGINES R's Tax Apportionment Report and enter such apportionments on the maps and ledgers. Such parcels will initially be identified by their legal description and the Assessor parcel number wdl be entered as soon as known. ?. It is ant:upated that the Soenal Tax will 6e levied on the basis of net area. As development records and public dedications are made, the taxable area of the Di stnct wdl reduce. ENGINEER shall con sfantly monitor debt service obligation versus taxable area so as fo protect the tax rate wrthin the maximum allowed, IV. Other Serv ¢es The services indicated above envision carrying the admmisfraUOn of the D istnct Through calendar Year 1985, including an initial tax levy, which anticipates an initial bond sale. If requested, ENGINEER shall provide the following addrtmnal services: 1. Annual finanual admm~stration of the protect including the formu- IaLon and processing of each years Speual Tax during the life of the Community Facilities Distnci or during the life of any bonds issued. ?. If directed by GITI', develop and administer a program o4 disclo- sure, recog razing that at this point there is no statutory require• ment related to conveying the knowledge to a homeb uyer that this Special Tax will be imposed upon his property. 7 EXHIBIT B . CO~iPENSA71ON In setting forth the compensation, it is understood that CITY will either provide ENGINEER with the assistance of a bond attorney and financial consultant assouated with the protect or, if directed, ENGINEER would supply such services by subcontract at cost. Compensation for the various efforts will be based upon the regular sala- ry costs in effect by ENGINEER at the time services are performed, with the following maximums which will not be exceeded in accordance with Section 4, Payment, of the Agreement. 1. For the services set forth in Paragraph I, fhe maximum fee of s5.000. Z, For services set forth m Paragraph I1, a maximum fee of 818,000. 3. For apportionment, an amount equal to 830.00 per newly created parcel upon which an apportionment is made. The estimated amount is 83,000. 4. A budget of 51,50D far printing and computer Lme is estimated and shall not be exceeded without additional authonze4on. • 5. For services set forth in Paragraph IV, a maximum fee to be nego- mated when and if the serves are authorized and the cope of such se rvme5 is known. ENGINEER shall invoice CITY once monthly and CITY shall pay ENGINEER in accordance with CITY's regularly followed disbursement process. En- gmeer~s cost of panting and other outside expenses shall be compensated at cost plus ten percent. Computer expense shall be invoiced at cost. • 8 s • aES!lt U?ION '!0. ~ ' ~ Q RESnL L'T!ON OF THE C:TV COUNCSL OF THE CITY OF RAN C40 CUCAMONf,A, CALIFORNIA, AUTNOAIZI Nf T4E :SS'JANCE OF CE4TA L9 90ND'> TO FI YAYf,E ~ACI'_:T:ES :N A CDMMUN ITY FAC[L:?IE$ DIS T4iCT WH E4 E=5, Lhe C:TV CO'J';C'- Of Lhe CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA, CAL ;FO4';:A (he r'e ina`[er referretl Lo as The "lec;s'~a[ive body of the local Agency"), es Cabl;shed a C.omm~,;nity °dc ~~l~ties di; [ricC, ours uanc to the terms and provisions Of the "Mei to-4o os Commu- nity Far ii ties Act Of lgg2" !the "Act"1, being Chanter 2.5, Part t, Division 2 T i['e 5 0` the 5ove rnment ',Ode of the State of California, said Comm uni Cy `atil Y. ies district referred to as .DMM'JNITV FP.C ILIT:E$ DISTRICT N0. 1 (he ro jnd`ter referred [0 d5 the "DiStriGt"); dnd, WHEREAS, oursuant to Resolution adcD ted by the legislative body and oursuant Co the provisions of law, a snecial election was duly and regularly held relating to the levy of d spec al tzx and the incur r, na of a bonded indebtedness in the Community Facilities District, at wh i;h ele cc ion there was submitted [0 the aualieied voters of said D15LY iCL Che fO11pWi^~= OrODOSI[ipp, [0-WiC D40AOS:T: D"I • C: 7Y On pANCNp CUCAM^'!,A (CpMM'JN ITV =A CILITIE$ `1iSTp;CT N0. Ad-1, ORY rq rrK DRA: VA.;E SY51EM) AU TNORIZATION '0 :VC'JR 90IJDED IYDE9'E7 NES5 AND A'JTHORIZAT:ON FOR SaEC [AL TAX LEVY Sha11 the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, Community Facilities District No. Ad-1 (Day Creek Drainage System) inu~r a banded indehtedness in an amount no[ to exceeA 520,225,000.00, co finance certain public capital drainage improve- menCS to meet the needs of new develop- ment wi Ch in the Community facilities Dis Cr ict, inc lud imp all appurtenant work necessary and incidental expenses, said indebtedness [o be secured by annually levied soecial taxes? YES NO Tae rate and aoo0r[~~cn Went Of the special tax shall ae nerally he as fol loos: The Community Facilities Dtstrlcc has been divttled into two zones: ZONE "A": general areas to be serveA by the drainage facilities, ezclu- sive of Zone "9", ZONE "B": A limited area, he inn only partially served by drainage fac i-• li ties. Zone "R" consists of chose properties bounded en the South by X00 THiLL ROULEVaR D, on the East by ROCHESTER AVENUE, on the North 6y RASE LINE ROAD, and on the West by the prolong attgn of ?1I'_L iK E!7 AVEV'J E. The rate, method and formula far the levy pf [he special tax for the r esoect ivB zones, being Zone "A" and Zone "6^, is as 'ollows, based upon a bond a^•o un*. not [o exceed 520,225,000.90, payah'e over a periotl of years not to exceed twenty (20, years. ZO"!E "A.": NOT TO EXCEED SS SO.OO PER ACRE. 20NE "R": NO_ TO E%CE ED 5550.00 PER ACRE FOP, l9q ALB ES. At such time as the final drainape plan is es [abllshed for Zone "9", only these prone roes that drain into the DAY CP,EEK CHANNEL shall be sup iect to the soeci al drainape Fee. Areas pf Zone 'B" in ex:;ess of 190 acres that d0 drain 7n[a ChB DAY CREEK CHANNEL Sha:l be SUb iect to a drainape fee. and, WHEREAS, said oroo osition received the affirmative voce and assent of ~rore than two-thirds (2/3) of all pf the qualif ieA electors voting on said prooosi Lion: and, WHEREAS, at th 15 time this 'eaislative Endy, act inn in its capacity ds The po verni np body of [he District, 15 ^es i"ou5 [o proceed to authorize the issuance of bonds t0• o tnance the improvements in said District, as au the r; zed by the act and for the a ur'p 05eS se[ fo1'Ch 1^ Said bd'. loC prpp 051[100; and, W4E°EAS, this legislative body is also desirous to autnori ze the vali dacipn of said bonds and the soeci al tax securing payment thereon. VOW, TH EREF OP E, 9E iT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTIOr; 1. Th ac the above recitals are all true and correct SEC, TION 2, That this legislative body dges hereby gut her ize the issuance of ponds of the Community Facilities Oistr ict No. 1 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "Bonds") pursuant to the authori zacion of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Act"), beinq Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division ?, Title 5 of the Government Code of the St ace of California, and said bonds shall be issued to finance the facilities as set forth in the ab pve ballot pr onosit ion. The bonds shall be dBSigr.a ted "C,TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COwM7!I:TV FaC;~~1T;ES OISTR: CT N0. 1, 90 NOS", shall he in an amount not co exceed 520, 225,000.00, and shall be issua6le in denomina- tions o` S5,^OO or any in L Aral multiple thereof. For further Specific pare culars and cpndi bons relat inn to the terms and conditions of the sale df ponds, a Notice df Sale mall pe presented and considered by this legislative hotly prior to the acceptance of any proposal, • SECTION 3. That F, M4 CKEV ZI: BROWN, INL „ SonA Counsel, is hereby autheri zed and directed [o forthwith file and prosecute to final juAgment an action in the Suoerior Cou rT [o determine [he validity of [he pr oceeAi na s, [he authori zat icn o' [he special tax anA enforce aY,lity of [he hoods. ARRROVE? aM A70 °TEO this daY pf 1997. C;TV OF RAN C:10 CUCAMON ;A STATE OF CAL IFOR N,~ ATTEST. C!?v CL EaK C iT.v OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CAl [FORN:A i O 7 r `/•n • DRDINANCE N0. o-,-,-~~~ '~ AN ORDINANCE B1<,~Ii6.GS7Jk'r.4lMlEft OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE N0. 84-05 TO PREZONE THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION AS "CAR Y:'1 P!ANNEO COMMUNITY" AND ADOPT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR APPROXIMATELY 248 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN THE E%TENSI O.J OF BANYAN AV Ei:UE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH, AND BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND MI LL IKEN AVENUE ON THE EAST AND 'BEST. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California has initiated proceedings for the Change of Organization (annexation) for the above described property pursuant to Section 56195 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, desires to prezone the above-described unincorporated territory pursuant to Section 65859 of the California Government Code. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the prez oning of the above described properties to "Caryn Planned Comm pity" as defined in the attached Development Plan Text and its Conditions of Approval which are by this reference made a part hereof, and that this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duty heard and considered said recommendation. B. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and C. That this prezoning will provide far the development of a comprehensively planned urban community within Lhe District Lhat is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations. J trU City Council Ordinance Page tit D. That this prezoning will provide for development within • the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. E. That this prezoning will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities and public services required by development with Lhe District. r". That this prezoning is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. G. This prezoning would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Declaration is issued. S ECi[ON 2: The above described real property is hereby prezoned in the mannner stated, and the development district map is hereby amended accordingly. Further, the development of said property shall be regulated by the adopted Development Plan text and its Conditions of Approval and in part by the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. SECTION 3: That the prezoning shall hecome effective at the same time that the annexation becomes effective pursuant to Section 65959 of the California Government Code. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk • ~. / • CITY OF R:1~CH0 CCC a3I0~1Gd STAFF REPORT DATE: February 6, 1985 T0: `^ayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 8Y: Otto Kroutil, Senior ?lan ner ~%%-\tj Q~~ ° 'q ,. _~~_ " z _ ~ Z ._ -.L__-.~: SUBJECT: DEVELO?MEAT AGREEMENT - CARYN - A development agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Caryn Development Company, Kaufman & Broad Land Company, and Marlborough Development Corporation relative to properties located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and west. BACKGROUND: Rs you will recall, on December 19, 1984, the City Council entered into an Annexation Agreement for the County approved Caryn Planned Community Site. Annexation proceedings for the 248 acre site, bound by Highland and future extensions of Milliken, Banyan, and Rochester, are currently underway. The Local Agency Formation Commission is expected to review the City's annexation petition at its February 20, 1985 meeting. The Annexation Agreement, which is currently in effect, outlines the terms of both the annexation and the development of the subject property. However, once the annexation is complete, a separate development agreement hetween the City and the developers will he required to assure Lhat future development of the site is consistent with the intent of the original approvals. This development agreement is presented far your consideration tonight. FJ I[. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: The Draft Development Agreement, attached for your review, imp emen is the Annexation Agreement provisions. It is virtually ident~cal to the approved Annexation Agreement, except that the provisions dealing with annexation of the property have been eliminated. The prinr.iples of the agreement are that any duplicate approvals of the project by the City be consistent with City format, but that there be no conditions more onerous than those contained in the original County approvals, and that certain fees would not be applied to the property (systems fee and 6e autif is at ion fee). The park fee and storm drain fee would not be assessed since extensive storm drains and park and open space improvements are a part of the development approvals. The owners of the property agree with inclusion in the landscape and street lighting maintenance ~~~ C[TY COU'1C IL STAFF REPORT Development Agreement - Caryn February 6, 1985 Page 2 districts as well as in the Day Creek Mello-Roos District. Gwner also agrees the payment of all school fees. All negotiated points outlined in the Annexation Agreement are also contained in the Development Agreement. IiI. CORRESPONDENCE/PUBLIC INPUT: The Development Agreement has been advertised in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, for a public hearing. To date, no correspondence has been received on the subject. IV. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on Planning Commission 8irect ion, it is retortmiended that the City Council hold a pubiiC hearing on the Development Agreement and adopt the attached ordinance approving the Development Agreement as presented. ~p ly suhmitted: Rick Gomez City Planner RG:OK:ns Attachment • • • I~~ C • RE SCVJTIO'I 'i0. 35-07 A RESOLCTiO'! OF THE PLAIN I"G C^u X'^ISSi O`7 OF THE CI T'f OF BANC'r;0 ^_'JC;;'~At1GA RE Wh!."xENO i'1G TO T'rE CITY COUIJC IL AP P~40VAL OF A OW EEOPMENT AGRE E`"ENT RET'd EE"1 THE CITY OF RA"IC HO COC R1401iGA AND CA.RYN DEVELOP?lE BT COYIPA:'7Y, KAUFMA"J AND 3~40AD LANG COMPANY, At10 I4AR LiiO ROCGH DEVELOP:^.E NT COR?ORAT20'7, I'J RELATIO'J i0 THE PROP E~R TY GENERALLY LOCATED BET'dEEN THE E%TENSI O'! OF 6A!IYAN AVENUE Af1D THE RROPOSEO FOOT9ILL FREE'dAY ON THE NORTH A"70 SC7TH, A^ID GET'W'c E)! THE E%TE:JSIO!1 OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE ON THE `AST AND 'REST. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated annexation proceedings for the above-described property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, following a duly held public hearing is rocommending approval of the Caryn Planned CommUO ity on said • property to the City Council; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission, following a duly held public hearing has approved TT12642 for a portion of the property; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the development of the property in accordance with the Caryn Planned Community/Development Plan text within the City limits would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City, in that the property, developed in a manner authorized by the development approvals would be consistent with the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the implementation of said development in accordance with the Planned Community/Development Plan can be best acromplished through the provisions of Lhe attached Development Agreement (which is by reference incorporated herein). NO'd, TH E.R EFORE, the Planning Commission of the Ci±y of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve to recommend to the City Council approval of the attached Devn lopment Agreement upon annexation of the property to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. "4 PLANNI`1G CO'1MI SSION • S0. UTION ~~ January 9, 1984 Page #2 • APPROV EO ANO ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1935. PLANNIfIG~CIIh1MiSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I. ~ Dennis L,L~Stou+<,_Cnair~a'an ATTES :~ I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho C;.t amonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January, 1985, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, MCN[`rL, BARKER, CHITIEA, RE;4PEL NOES: COMM ISS IO'IERS: NO`IE • ABSENT: CO?!'4I SS TONERS: NONE • I ='~ c ~ • DE'/Ei02:iE MT AGREEh!EN^ TA3LE OF COVTECITS RECITALS 1 1.0 City Development Approvals 2 1.1 Planned Community Zone, Text, Su~odiv rs ion [?an, and Paccei Mao 2 1.2 2nvi[onmental Review 3 2.0 Owne r's Rights and Duties 3 2.1 Right Co Develop 3 2.2 Rel ian r._ nn Approvals 4 2.3 Development as Approved 5 2.4 Dedications 5 2.5 Improvements 6 2.6 Gtilit'y Easements 7 • 7 2 k Site P 7 . ... ac 2.8 Gc ailing 7 2.9 Fees 8 a, School Fees 8 b. Building Permit and Construction Fees 8 c. Store Drain Fees 9 d. Recreation and Park Fees 9 e. Traffic Mitigation Fee 9 f. Other Fees 9 3.0 Assessment Districts and Public E'inancing Methods 10 3.1 ;Mello-Roos and Lighting and Landscaping Districts 10 3.2 1913 Act Assessment District 10 3.3 Mortgage Revenue Bonds 11 _ . ( ~ 3.4 Maintenance Asszssment District 13 • 4.0 Termination Date; Exoication 13 5.0 P.e view 13 5.1 Annual Review 13 5.2 Independent Review 14 6.0 Renedies Upon pefault l5 6.1 Owner's Renedies .~ 15 6.2 City's Remedies 15 6.3 Actions of Other Agencies 15 7.0 Amendment cc Cancellation 16 8.0 Fur the[ Assurances and Additional Actions ny City 17 9.0 Notices 17 10.0 Assignment 18 11.0 Entice Agreement 18 • 1i .0 severability 19 13.0 Independent Contractors 19 EX F:i3IT A Property Description EXH_T 9IT B Planned Community Te%t/Development Plan EXHIBIT C Tentative [lap Approval EXHIBIT D Parcel Mao AFPCOVal EXHIBIT E Caryn 's Park Development Plan • ;.~= • ORDINRNC'c NO. fi`--0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORAIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARYN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, KAUFMAN AND BROAD LANG COMPANY, AND MARLBOROUGH DE'JELOPMENT CORPORATION, IN RELATION TO THE PROPERTY GEYERAL!Y LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF BANYAN AVENUE AND Th',E PROPOSED FOOTHILL FR EE'WAY ON THE IJORTH AND SOUTH, At1D B "e T'WE EN THE EXTENSION OF RGCHESTER AND MILLIKEN AV EtJU'ES OA THE EAST AND 'WEST. 'WHEREAS, the City Council, following duly held public hearings approved the Caryn ?lammed Community on property described in Exhibit "A" and generally located as described above; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the development of the property in accordance with the Caryn Planned Community/Development Plan text within the City limits would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City, in that the property, developed in a manner authorized by the development approvals would be consistent with the City's General Plan; and WHE~4EAS, the implementation of said development in accordance with the Planned Community/Development Plan text within the City limits would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City, in that the property, developed • in a manner authorized by the development approvals would be consistent with the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga passed a reso lutian recommending approval of this Development Agreement Lo the City Council NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines as follows: A. Government Code Section 65864 through 65869.5 authorizes the City to enter into binding Development Agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property. B. Three copies of the proposed Development Agreement are on file in the. office of the City Clerk, and the same are public records of the City, C. The City Council has held a public hearing on the Caryn Development Agreement and notice of that public hearing has been given for the time and in the manner prescribed by Government Cede Section 65861. r~ 7 Ordinance 1JO. P-2-6-1-0 Page 2 D. The provisions of the Caryn Development Agreement are • consistent with the General Plan and the Caryn Planned Community text, and there i<_ no Specific Plan affecting the property subject to the orooosed Development Agreement. SECTION 2: The Caryn bevelopment Agreement referred to in Section 1 above, is hereby approved. Or the efifective date of this Ordinance the Mayor shall sign as many copies or said Development Agreement as are necessary for the use of the parties, the City Clerk shall attest to the same and shall deliver one fully signed copy to each oarty to the Agreement. SECTION J: No later than ten (10) days hereafter the effective date of this Ordinance the City Clerk shall record the Caryn Development Agreement with the San Bernardino County Recorder. The idayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: • NOES: A65ENT: on D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A, uthelet, City Cler J ~;.~ ~ j' C ~''¢•~~ DEVELOPttENf `AGREEMENT ' • THiS JE'JELO?t^.E C:. AGREEi4ENT (the 'Agreement") is wade and entered :n[o this day of , 1985, by tae CI^.Y 0° RAt1C 80 CJC AidO[7GA ("City,") a municipal corporation, THE CARYii DEV ELO?:d E;IT CO:IPACJY ("Cacyn,') a California ccr poca[ron, KAU'MAC] A:7D BROAD LACID CCMPAC7Y ("K b 3,") a California corporation, and MARLDOROCGH DEVEL OP'1 E;JT COR?JRATI O[: ("'1DC,") a California corporation, Cazyn, x & 9 and 1~]DC ace sometimes herein referred to collectively as "Owner," RECITALS Caryn, K 6 B, and MDC have own ershin interests in the real property described in Exhibit A which is attached to this Agreement and a part of it ("the Property".) On December 19, 1984, the parties to this Agreement entered into an Annexation • Agreement setting forth the conditions under which they would consent to the annexation of the Property to City, Section 4.1 of [he Annexation Agreement provides that a>- a condition of annexation, City will confirm the terms of Article 4 of the Annexation Agreement, and such other provisions of the Annexation Agreement as have yet to be performed, as a development agreement, This is Chat development agreement. It shall be effective upon the annexation of the Propez[y Co City, and it is adopted in compliance with and pursuant to Sections 65864 and following of the Government Code after hearings before and review by the Planning Commission and City Council of City, ~~~ C The City has determined that the development of the Property in a manner authorized by this Agreement ~.rould he • consistent with the City's General Plan. Therefor=_, in consideration of the promises, mu.ual covenants herein contained, and foe other good and sufficient consideration, the receipt of which is hereoy acknowiedced, the parties agree as follows: 1.0 City Development Approvals. 1.1 Planned Community Zone, Text, Subdivision "ao and Parcel Mao, Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65859, City has prezoned the residential portion of the Property as planned Community, which zoning classif icat:on is effective upon the annexation of the Property to the City. A Planned Community Text/Development plan has been adopted by the • City for Phase I and subsequent oiiases of .ievelopment of the Property, It is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B and a part of it. Owner has submitted to the City for its approval, (pursuant to California Government Code Section 66454), Tentative Tract Map No. 12642 and an application for pazcel map approval as contemplated by the Certificate of Compliance issued by the County. The resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract ;4ap No. 12fi 42 is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit C and a par[ of it, The resolution of the Planning Commission approving Parcel Map No. 8617 is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit D and a part of it. As used in this Agreement, the term "City Development • Appr ovals• shall mean and refer to the approvals described _2_ i !. ~ ~ above in this Section '_.1 of the zoning, Planner Co:amcni~y . Text/Development Plan, tentative nap approval, and gaccel map approval, and the provisions of this Agreement. 1.2 Environmental Review. City agrees to undertake all necessary and aporoor iate review and evaluation of the potential environmental impact of tut develop~ent of the Pcopeety in accordance with the City Development Approvals, and shall be the "lead agency" for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Ci[y shall cause the environmental processing and evaluation necessary for the dev eloonent of [he Property in accordance with the Development Approvals to be ob[ained on a timely basis and in conf ocmity with all applicable legal requirements. . 2.0 Owner's Rights and Duties. 2.1 Right to Develop. Owner shaJ.l have the right to subdivide the Property and to construct single family residences as contemplated by, and subject only to the City Development Approvals and compliance wi t'n existing iaws and ordinances, provided Owner shall comply with the pc ov isions of the uniform building and safety codes of the City then in effect, subject to the provisions of Section 2.9 of this Agreement concerning fees. City shall not [ake any action which is in conflict with the development of the Property in conformity with the Ci[y Development Approvals. City further agrees to act with reasonable diligence and in an expeditious manner in reviewing and acting upon submittals, applications, oc requests for permits, approvals or other au th o[izations -3- C C consistent with the City Development Approvals, City aay, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65366, apoiy new • rules, regulations and policies for the development of t.._ Property which are not in conflict with those rules, regulations and policies applicable at the [iae of the City De•/elopment Approvals and •.+h icn do no[ frustrate the puepose of this Agreement, or in any other manner materi311y and acvecsel7 affect the development of the property consistent with the City Development Approvals. 2.2 Reliance on Approvals. Owner shall at all [ices until the 'Termination Date" (as hereinafter defined) have the right to develop the residential portion of the Property in accordance with the rules, regulations, and ordinances applicable to development of real property existing as of the • date of the City Development Approvals, s~_nject to any natter, prohibition, restriction or approval of such development which is subject to the authority or juc isdietion of a govecnme ntal agency other than the City or a political subdivision of the City. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, City agrees that the only planning, zoning, design, density, height limitations, use limitations, parking requirements, grading, subdivision, environmental, architectural and development standards and requirements to be applied to [he residential portion of the property by the City shall be those contained in ordinances and rules and regulations in effect on the date of the City DevelopmenC Approvals (as the same may have been the subjeck of any duly enacted variance or other discretionary • _q_ ~' I t ~ nod ification procedure enbodizd in the City Development • Approvals), and [hat su c'n standards and restrictions snail continue to govern the development of the residential portion of the property irrespective of any changes made hereafter to such ordinances, rules or reaulatio ns. 2.3 Development as Approved. Owner agrees that it will not develop the Property in a manner materially inconsistent with the City Development Approvals. Owner agrees tna[ its development of the Property will be subject to the reservations and/oc dedications provided for in the final subdivision tract nap for the Property to the extent required by the City Development Approvals. 2.4 Dedications. Folloeting the issuance of the City Development Approvals and the annexation of the Property to the • City, the Owner shall offer, and the Ci[y shall accept for maintenance, (a) the dedication of each ma7oc and minor roadway on t'ne property (including without limitation Proposed Banyon Avenue, and [he so-called loop roads), and all other public improvements, as each is substantially completed by or on bzhalE of Owner in accordance with the final map and improvement plans and the City's applicable public improvement standards and regulations in effect on the date hereof, as modified by t'n is Agreement, including the Exhibits which ate attached to it, and ('o) the "Pack Site" (as hereinafter defined), all landscaping strips and equestrian trails, as each of sa rye is substantially completed in accordance with the final map plans, the City Development Approvals, and the City's applicable public improvement standards and regulations in -5- i '~ } C effect on the date hereof, as modified by this Agreement, including the Exhibits which are attached to it. Tne City . agrees that at any and all tines after acceptance of dedication, and notwithstanding the tee ~ination or expiration of this Agreement, and subject to such guarantees as are set forth in the City's public improvement reeulations as the sane exist as of the date hereof, as codified by this Agreement, including the Exhibits which are attached to it, the City s'nall 6e solely responsible for [he maintenance, repair and replacement of all portions of the Property so dedicatee by Owner. Except as hereinabove expressly provided, no additional dedication shall be required to be made by the Owner provided the Owner develops the Property substantially in accordance with the City Development Approvals. 2.5 Improvements. Owner shall be res Po nsible for the . installation of all on-site and off-site i~-~p rovements requited under the ordinances, rules and regulations existing as of the date of the City Development Approvals, including but not limited to, the provision of on-site streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drainage facilities and sewer and water service, The drainage pattern and design criteria for all drainage improvements, the width, grade, curvature and design of all streets, curbs and sidewalks, and the conceptual and improvement plans for all other off-site improvements, required to be constructed or installed by the City Development Approvals shall (iE in compliance with all applicable ordinances, rules and regulations( be approved by City within a reasonable time after submittal to City by owner, and upon -6- r r receiving such entitlement, Owner nay proceed ;o rake s.:ch . ir.,prov e.nents in accordance therewith. 2.6 L't ill ty "casements. ':he City shall app:eve ail necessary aooroociate oublic easements for date: and utilities as necessary to se[vice the Property as improved oy the rdner pursuant to this Aacee r„ent; provided, however, it is understood and agreed that all easements that are required Co o= acquired shall be paid for by Own eC. 2.7 Park Site. the public park (herein rofe::_d to as the 'Park Site") identified in the Develoonent Plan shall be maned "Caryn's Pack". Caryn's Park shall be developed in substantial conformity with the design shown in Exhibit 6 attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, Caryn's Park shall be developed in phases as desccioed in said 2xhioit • s. City's Director cf Community Services agrees to review all plans, drawings and specifications Eor said park in a pronnt Wanner. 2.8 Gr adina. City further agrees that Owner will have the right to commence grading upon securing a grading permit, and that permits will not be denied based on season or date provided that Owner agrees to comply with all City required precautions and to use due care in grading activities ana to take reason a'o le steps to prevent erosion, slippage oc dangerous run off conditions. Owner acknowledges that City, pursuant to existing grading regulations, is empowered to suspend or modify grading when hazardous conditions are determined to exist, provided that City will not exercise such power if Owner takes reasonable steps prescribed by the City to _~_ { ~ mitigace any potential damage, to assure that adjacent pcooerty owners will not be damaged, and to eepair any actual damage to • [he PCODEr t'f and all adjacent proper[? within a reasonaole ti-~e. 2.9 Fees. City and Owner agree that t'ne City's fees and exactions for development of [:ne 2rogerty shall be modified as follows if due and paid before the Termination Date of t'n is Agreement. a. School Fees. Fees for schools and schooling shall be paid solely in accordance with City Ordinance No. 69-C as the same exists as of the date hereof. b. Building Permit and Construction Fees. Plan check and building and construction permit fees shall be paid in accordance with the ' d l i i t h i i f • ty s ee sche u e as t ex s s a[ t e t me C Owner submits appropriate applications for building or construction permits; provided, however, that if the building and construction permit fee schedule, as it exis is as of the date of this agreement, is amended to impose a fee, exaction or imposition to reimburse the City for its costs, or otherwise defray the cost to the City, of providing a service which is not presently provided by the City, nor within the scope of services or purposes contemplated by the Uniform Building Code, • Owner shall no[ he obligated to pay such -8- C C additional fee, chaz;=, exaction or . • imposition. c, Storm Drain Fees, Inasmuch as the s^_o c:- drains required by the City Develop,,^.e r,t Approvals exceed the standards of the City, no store drain fees of any kind mill ne required of C'dnec if Property is developed to the requirements of the City Developrent Approvals. d. Recreation and Pack Fees. Inasmuch as the "park site" (as hereinafter defined) and other open space to be developed and dedicated or donated by Owner to the City, meets the standards and [equicements of the • City, no park or recrea ripe fees will be required of Owner if the Property is developed to the City Development Approvals, e. Traffic 6itigation Fee. The Traffic Mitigation Fee described in Condition of Approval No, 84 of Exhibit B to ttte Annexation Agreement Shall be reduced to Thirty-five thousand dollars, ($35,000.00.) f. Other Fees. Owner shall no[ be required to pay the city's 9eautification Fees or Systems Development Fees. ^o other fees or other charges shall be imposed upon Owner in connection with the development of the property in accordance with the City Development Approvals for any of the purposes or -9 - c ~ services mentioned in this Section 2.9 prior to the :er r. ~..^.a~ion Date of this Agreement. . 3.0 As sessaent Districts and public Financinc Methods. 3.1 ;lello-coos and Lighting and Landscaping District;. City and Owner hereby agree to use their bast effoc is to cause the annexation of the property to (a) t..e gay Creek :le llo-P,o os District established and existing within t;;e city for the installation, maintenance and provision of flood control and drainaye facilities, which, when constructed, will benefit the property, and (b) the Lighting and Landscaping District established and existing within the Ci[y so as to pc guide the property with all services presently provided to other properties within the City by such district. The City shall consider annexation to such other special benefit • assessment districts as may be requested from tine to time by Owner. The annexation of the Property to each of such districts shall be accomplished at the earliest possible time and shall be on [erns and conditions generally applicable to other properties presently within such districts. provided, h o~w ever, that no assessment shall he made under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act until 608 occupancy of each tract. 3.2 1913 Act Assessment District. If requested by Owner, City agrees to initiate and use its best efforts [o pursue to completion proceedings pursuant to the t1un icipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code, for the formation of one oc more assessment districts, and proceedings for the authorization and issuance . of improvement bonds pursuant to the Zmprovement Bond Act of -10- C ~ 1315, Oi'n sion 12 of [he Streets and Hichvays Cod=, to ,=finance • suc^ impr ov emen[ costs as identified oy Owner to _.._ amity .n ,...e ceGuest by Owner and authorized to be financed puesuant to suc^ Acts. O'•vner shall advance all costs, includinc [hose of the preparation of engin=eying plans and specifications, economic oc f'_nan cial studies and feasibilitf reports, and such ofher costs as are necessary or appropriate for the supervision and administration of the issuance and sale of assessment district bonds. The costs so advanced shall be reiapursed to Owner from the proceeds of the bonds issued. One or Wore series of improvements distc ict bonds may be issued to Einance such inpr ovenent costs. However, no bond shall be issued in an amount greater than (a) the cost of constructing those improvements identified by Ownee to City plus (b) amounts • inc:aded in the bond issue to cover the ce '.t of financing fees, discount fees, reseeve fund (not to exceed maximum dept service on such bonds for one fear), consulting fees attendant to the formation of the assessment dis icier, bond insurance prep iums, bond attorneys' Eees, ceimb ursements to Owner, and other costs normally and reasonably associated with the issuance of such bonds. 3.3 Moctaaye Revenue Hoods. If the City initiates a program to issue mortgage revenu=, indcstr ial revenue or similar type bonds or notes, the proceeds of which nay legally b? used to finance, in whole oc in part, the purchase by home buyers of any portion of the development of the Property by Owner, or [ne construction of such development by Owner, the Owner shall be allowed to participate in such a program. Such -11- pa cticipation shall be based on the rules and procedures of th_ Cit li d • y apa e on a uniform basis to all other d_veloners ~~+i t'n in the City, and Eor purposes of the allocation to 'oe made for the City's 1985 martgage revenue bond crogram, City shall not redace any allocation that otherwise wouln have been made to OtJn er on the basis that the property is not vet annexed to the City on the date of the allocation. If Owner, or an7 of to em, elects to participate in the City's 1965 mortgage revenue oond program, the following provisions shall aupl_v: a) The Clty shall no[ require the oayment of commit:er.t fees, (other than the 1/28 deposit fee) before March 5, 1985. b) On March 5, 1985, Owner, or an7 of them, may do any of the following: • 1) Effect not to participate in the mortgage revenue bond program. 2) pay the commitment fees, 3) Use its allocation, if any, in a separate issue which the City agrees to issue. If any Owner elects this option, Owner shall pay the applicable commitment fees Eor such separate issue, at such time as required by underwriter's counsel in order to maintain the allocation, and simultaneously pay any increased costs of the bond issue incurred by the City, or its redevelopment agency, together with all increased costs incurred by any other participants in the • 1985 bond program as a result of such division or -12- :.~ t i divisions of `_he issue. The amount, if e ., of • such increased costs, shall be Bete rirn= py the City anon the report of the undarwr iter. 3.; :!a intenance assessment District. :hose portions of tha Property to be dedicated by Owner to the City as prpvided in ?aragcaph 3.3 hereof shall be raintained by the Cie? or by a Landscaping and Lightino Ac[ of .;972 assessment district now existing oz hereafter Eor me d. The Owner as rees [o cooperate in and consent to the formation of tae assessment district, (or annexation to an existing district), for the maintenance of all such property, and including all of the Property within the district. 4.0 Ter ^.i nation Date; Exnira tion. 4.1 The term "Termination Date" shall mean [he • earlier of (a) the fifth (5th) anniversary of the date tat the first final subdivision tract map for Phase I shall have been zecor ded in the official R=cords of San 9ecnardino County, oz (6) Decempec 31, 1990. Provided, 'nowever, that this Agc ee;nen[ shall tezminate with respect [o each parcel ok the Property upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or release for occupancy for such pazcel. 5.0 Review. 5.1 Annual Review. City shall review this Agreement dt ledst Once every twelve month oez iod from the date this Agreement is executed at which time Owner shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Evidence of good faith compliance shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, the preparation of -13- ~~, J C ~ improvement plans following the issuance of the City Development Ap ocovals, the commene=Went of construction :pon • an7 portion of the Property, oc the peciodie ounlic advertisement for sale of single famil7 zesidentie: units within the ?ropecty. Owner shall be in default under thin A9cee;~ent if it provides City with a written notice sta t.,^.g t'n at it does not intend to perform further under it oe if Ci[y makes a finding and deter nination foll o~w ing the oresc r bed peciodie review as set forth above and as provided in California Government Code Sections 65861.1 that, upon t'ne basis of substantial evidence, Owner has not complied in good faith with the teens of this Agreement. 5.2 Independent review. It is hereby acknowledged and agreed that each of the nacties which comprise Owner will own, and as to K6a and MnC, will develop diffezent portions of . the property. The finding and determination by City pursuant to paragraph 5.1 above tha r_ one of the patties co mpcising Owner has not complied in good faith with the terms of this Agreement shall not bind the other parties comprising the Owner and shall not affect the rights of the other parties under this Agreement or the obligations of the City to such other parties unless and until City shall have independently found and deter Wined that each of such other parties has not complied in good faith with the terms of this Agreement. This exclusion shall not apply when there is a default by one or more affiliated owners or developers of the Property, in which case each affiliated owner may be found in default on the basis of such affiliation. "Affiliated' entities are those in which there is common • -14- ;' C C a.:neea~^:o of 304 or ^.o:e of t'ne entities, oc one o; c..._ a~.+ns 3G's or r..oce of anot::er. 5,f ~e^•e dies Goon Default o.l Owner's 3eaedies. Sx ceot as nrov:ded in paragcapn 5.; oereof, this agreement shall be er.f orceab'_e by 0'.+n ec no t~ecthstanding an7 change in any aoplicaole general oc specific plan, zoning, subdiv rs ion oc build:n,: reculac:on adopted by City an icl alters oc amends the roles, cegu lations, or policies soecif ien in California Government code Sections 65dfio. To the extent permitted by lay.+, Cher eEoca, it i-u expressly tern;.^,i zed that specific performance of this Ag:eenen[ foe t:;e 'u eneEit of 0•dner, and for each of t~ne parties comprising Owner, is a proper and desicaole remedy in addition Co any and all other remedies wnich may be availaole to 0'd net. • Pc ovided it is fur t'ner agreed that Owner sts11 have no cigar to da r.,ages in the event of breach of this Agceeiaent by City. 6.2 City's Remedies. City shall nave no right to any damages or other relief in the event of a breach of this Agreene nt by Owner except that Cit7 may suspend its oh Ligations and tecmin ate this Agree r.,ent as to the patty wnic'n comprises the Owner if such Party is in default, as defined in Paragraph 6.1. Provided, this shall not limit City's remedies under any other aereement with Owner oc which would otnecwise be available to it in the absence of this Agreement. 6.3 Actions o£ Other Agencies. If, as a result of the laws, regulations, or actions of federal, state oc ot'nec agencies having supremacy ove[ City, compliance with this Agreement by the City is pcev ented oc precluded, the provisions -15- ~ C of this Aq reement may be modified or suspended so as to comply with such laws, regulations or actions. If, i~owever, such • modification or suspension substantially deprives either of the parties of tae bargained for benefits of this Agreement, such parties shall be entitled t0 terminate this Agreement; provided, however, prior to any such termination, City shall negotiate in good faith with Owner tc reach a reasonable alternative development that may be undertaken by t'ne owner in lieu of the development or other~w ise to provide Owner with the ben of it of such covenant by City whi ci: is prevented or precluded by any laws, regulations, or actions of any federal, state or other ayency having supremacy over City, 7,0 Amendment or Cancellation. 7.1 This Agreement may be amended or cancelled in • whole oc in part only by mutual consent of the parties pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 65868 and the rules and regulations adopted by City. (a) Any amendment to this Agreement which does not relate to the Termination Date, permitted uses, density or intensity of use, height or size of buildings, provisions for reservation of land, conditions, terms, restrictions and requirements relating to subsequent discretionary actions, or any conditions oc covenants relating to the use of the property shall not require a public heariny before the parties may execute an amendment hereto. ib) Any nonsubs tantial deviations Erom the City Development Approvals, or from this Agreement as determined by City's City Manager, or Director of Community -16- i%.~, C C Development, shall not (to the exte r.t not otherwis= legally • requited) [equice any a^endment to this Agreement nor any public hearing uefore approval thereof by the City >:a mater or Director of Co mmuni^_y Development. d.0 F~.:cther Assurances and Additional .Actions 'ov Ci C~, 8,1 City shall, to the extent legally per~itted, take all actions necessary to effectuate and imol=_nent the t_r a,s and orov isions of ty is Agreement. 9.0 Notices. 9.1 Any notice to be eiven or oth_c documen to to be delivered by one party [o the other shall be delivered in person or by postage pzepaid, certified or registered rag il, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: To City: Mr. Jack Lan • Director of Commun:ty Develonment City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 aaseline Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California To Owner: Zf to Kb a: Kaufman and Broad Land Company 11601 Ailsnire Boulevard 11th F1ooL Los Angeles, California 90025 Attention: Mr, Clyde Lane With copies to: Kaufman and Broad Legal Depac tment 11601 Wilshire Boulevard 11th Floor Los Angeles, California 90025 IE to MDC: Marlborough Development Corporation 2029 Century Park Rast Suite 1550 Los Angeles, California 90067 Attention: Michael Romeo If to Caryn: The Caryn Development Company 10340 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: ~y.,~2~~j,j rcT-'ice U ~ -17- `t Flith conies to; Tho ^,35 ClarK, vr., Esq. St:adlin4, Yocca, Carlson ; 3au]n • 660 ;:e wooer Center Drive SLLlte 160J Bewporc Ecach, California 9265C-540'. Any mailed notice 4iven as afoeesaid shall 'oe deemed effective 48 hours after de cos it into the United Slates ^,a:1 as aforesaid. Either party hereto r.~ay from ti^e to ti.r~e, by writter, notice to any of the other parties, desi4nate ~ different Wane oc address which shall be substituted for roar 4iven above. Tne channe of na r.e oc addeess shall be effectcve upon receipt of personally delivered oc five (5) days aft=: t.e date of deposit of the notice into the United Stales mail if by mail, 10.0 Assignment. 10.1 Owner, and ea c'n of [hen, shall have tine ugiit to • assign oc transfer their respective rights, title and interest under this Agceera=_nt, in whole or in part, to any person, fir^., corporation oc entity without the prior written consent of City. In [he event of any such assignment, the assigning Owner shall provide City with written notice of such assignment at least thirty (30) days prior to such assignment or transfer. The obligations of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits hereof shall inure to, tine successors-in-interest and assigns of the Owners. 11.0 Entice Agreement, 11,1 This Agreement, including the Exhibits hereto, contained the entire agreement between the oarties and any ag[eemen is or representations concerning this Agreement, the • Property, or the development of the Property by the Owners -18- i ~ i" pursuant hereto, not set forth herein sha!1 'oe of no force or • effect, 12.0 Severaoility. 12.1 Subject to Pazagraph 5.3 hereof, if any ter-~, condition, provision, oc covenant of this Agreement, or the apoiica r.ron thereo `. to amp person or circu stance, s all be finally held invalid or unenforceable by a cncct of competent jucisdictron, the remainder of this Agreement and its application shall not be affected and shall [emain valid and enforceable to the Eu 11 est extent permitted by law, 13.0 Independent Contcacto:s. 13.1 In carrying out the provisions of this Agreement, Owner and City shall act as independent contractors and nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed or • construed by the parties hereto or by any `_h ird person to create the relationship of principal and agency, joint venturers or partnership. IN f7ITNESS L7H EREOF, this Annexation Aqr eemen[ is made and entered into as of the date and year first above w[itten. THE CARYN DEVELOPNE;IT COMPANY, a Califoenia Co[oora lion By: By: Its STATE OF CALIFORtiIA ) COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 1985, before me, the -19- r JC STAFF REPORT GATE: February 6, 1985 T0: Mayor and 'lembers of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 8Y: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner c~_->~<o ..`c,. < j s ~~.r ~.``~ . , s - Io-= d SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TNDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC ?LAN AMENDMENT 84-02 -HAVEN OVERLAY DISTRICT - An amendment to the Industr al Area Specific Plan to create a Haven Avenue Overlay District located along Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street, The Overlay District will modify permitted land uses and provide specific design standards regarding site planning and architecture. • BACKGROU`1D: The Haven Avenue Overlay District and associated items presented to the City Council in this and the following report represent 6-months of effort by the Planning Commission, Our ing that time period, the Commission Held siz hearings on the subject of Haven Avenue, and additional meetings involving the Economic Development Subcommittee of the Chamber of Commerce were also held to facilitate comments from the community, The result, the 'Haven Avenue Overlay District Ordinance, is before you tonight for your consideration. There were a number of reasons for considering creation of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Haven Avenue is located near the geographical center of the City and will be the most significant gateway into Rancho Cucamonga, The importance of Haven Avenue is highlighted by future and planned development which includes the County Law and Justice Center, the future Civic Center, the Barton Plaza, and other development in the vicinity of Foothill and Haven Avenue. South of the City, Ontario Intern at ion ai Center is planned with a major hotel to be developed in the near future. Finally, Haven Avenue provides access to Chaffey College artd will be a major entryway into the Ontario Internation ai Airport. However, sign if ;cant concerns were raised by the Planning Commission regarding the land use, building configuration, site planning, and style of architecture most appropriate and des irah le for Haven Avenue. Two projects submitted for Haven Avenue and denied by the Planning Commission highlighted the need for more defined design goals and development regulations for Haven Avenue. The Or aft Overlay Oistrict Ordinance, presented for your consideration, answers this need and wilt provide the City with the opportunity to enhance its image by providing intensive, high l .. ~, ~. 1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ISP Amendment 84-02 - Haven Avenue Overlay Dis*_rict February 6, 1985 Page 2 • quality office and professional development along this significant boulevard. II. OVERLAY DISTRICT OV ERV IE'A: Staff has incorporated into the Overlay District text the recommendations of the Planning Commission and Chamber of Commerce. The following is a brief summary of the key components of the Overlay District. For more detailed information, please consult the text of the ordinance attached to this report, or the five detailed Planning Commission reports distributed for your information under separate cover. The Overlay District contains three basic topic areas: A. Land Use Re ulat ions: The permitted and conditionally permitted land uses o the existing Subareas 6 and 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan have been revised to reflect more appropriate land uses along the Haven Avenue corridor. The major change involves the prohibition of manufacturing facilities of any kind along the Haven Avenue frontage. Further, ancillary commercial and business support uses are limited to a maximum 20 percent of the total floor area. • Rather, emphasis is placed on the development of office professional facilities and related support uses, such as restaurant, community facilities, etc. Master Plano in The Overlay Oistrict further defines the master p ann ing requirement for development along Haven. The intent of the master plan process is to encourage integrated master piano ed development rather than fragmented, piecemeal development. This process facilitates reciprocal parking and access, clustered common open space/plaza areas, and coordination of improvements without the constraint of parcel lines or specific site boundaries. Develo ment Standards: The proposed development standards for site orientation, an dscap ing, open space, pedestrian environment, and architecture have been tailored to implement the intent and purpose of the stated design goals for Haven Avenue. These development standards are based on experience with other projects submitted along Haven Avenue and other areas of the City with the express intent of achieving the stated design goals. The boundaries of the Overlay District, as recommended by the Planning Commission, would include portions of Subareas 6 and 7 as shown in Figure V-1. From Civic Center Drive south to • Trademark, the Overlay District is generally one lot deep in most locations, which equates to between 225 and 600 feet, depending on the depth of existing lots. At the key /G CITY COUNC?L STAFF REPORT ISP Amendment 84-02 - Haven Avenue Overlay District • February 6, 1985 Page 3 intersections ofi 4th Street and Haven and Foothill Boulevard and Haven the depth of the Overlay District widens to approximately 1,000 feet to accommodate more intensive deve lnpment appropriate for the two intersections. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: To approve the Haven Avenue Overlay District, the City Council should make the following findings: A. That the Haven Avenue Overlay District is consistent with General Plan land use policies and Industrial Area Specific Plan; and, 8, That the Haven Avenue Overlay District promotes the goals of the Land Use Element and the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and, C, That implementation of the Haven Avenue Overlay District standards and regulations would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. • IV. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council review and adopt the attached Ordinance and ,issue of a Negative Declaration. Res py,'ctfuyYy-submitted, R :jr FIG. V-2 MASTER AREAS PLAN CIRCULATION ~ 120' R.O.W- ~~ 100' R.O.W. 88' or lesa R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE -~~-~•~ Existing .r+++- PfoPOSed TRAILS/ROUTES 0 0 0 o Pedestrian • ~ ~ • BIcYCIe ~?•-G Regional Multi-Use --'~^ Special Streetscape/ "^°^"°` Lantlscaping ...............- ..........._._: Power Llne/ Utility Easement .~ Creeks 8 Channels '~ r1 Bridge Access Points :~ 1Park © Fire Station 5~ 10 Acres ~- , 0 0 400 800 160 ~~ -- 'i 4 pyh MOitu 9 i t a ~ • u AT { $F N.fl. __ ~ '1 wev., ..a~.. s •. ~ . i 11+x___-., E w}ye.n. ~ f i r ~ i >7• I~- _~+~ JIi. f • ciry oP RA.uc!to cucxMo~cA PART II - INITIAL SP'-Y ESCIROV'>EyTAL CNEC'dLIST DATE i A.°PLICA:. : _~ ~!GG fj.~~.{µcs '- (~-// ~ ,~- FILI::G -ATE: ' :/ LOG NL'IflE7~:T~ ~/ /}~/I~H~.I.i/wtr/1 yQ 'r/Z PROJEC": / fPt~(CG,Y /~'~ ~LfhC //(/L'Ct~(~~},~~r~//n;7 G/"~/A~o~.lii~y~~~px PRO.:IC' LJCATIO\: J( [jQ/C1l ~T ~C~J~N ~/~/,(C~,/ 1Y~^1, 7"CK-C:-F•'"7"' (Exp ianac ion of all "yes" ar.d "maybe" answers are required on attach ed Shee[a). YTS v.`'_` \0 1. Soils a::d Ce oio~. 'dill [he proposal have • s.3: :Einant resui[s ia: a. Cnsc ab le ground condic ions or in changes in geo iogfc relatiorships'. / b. -isrup; ions, disp latemen is, compac[SOn or burial of [he soil? % c. Change in topography or ground surface contour Sncervals? d. 'Ihe destruction, covering or mod i'. icacian of any unique geologic or physical features^. e. Any potent lal increase in wind or eater erosion of so 11s, affecting etcher on or of: site condlco ns'. -f/ f. Changes Ir, erosion sil cat ion, or deposition'. ,_ g. Exposure of people or property [o geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- /' slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? __ _ h. An increase Sn the rate of extraction and/or ' use of any mineral resource? -_ / 2. Hydrology, W111 [he proposal have signlf leant Lesul[s in: ~~? l ~ page ' YES MAYHE SO a. Changes in Curren cs, or the course of direc clon of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral scream ' • channels? b. Changes Sn absorption races, drainage pa cterns, or the rate and amounC of surface eater runoff? c. Alt eras ions to the course or floe of flood wale rs? - .r d. Change in the amount of surface water in anv body of water? e. Discharge Sn to surface wa cers, or am alteration of surface water quality? f. Al teracion of groundwater charatteris[ics? y_ g. Change Sn the quantity of groundvacers, either through direct add icSO ns or wieh- dravals. of through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? _ L h. She reduction 1n the amount of eater o:her- S vise available for public water supplies? 1 i. Exposure of pecple or proper[}' to vase: rela Ced hazards such as Flooding or se is hes? _ 1 3. Air Quali n•. WS11 the proposal have significant res ults in: a. Cons cant or periodic air emissfo ns f:om mobile / or ind irecc sources? ~ Stationary sources? _ .- b. Deterioration of amb lent air qualicy and/or In ce rf erence with [he attainment of applicable air quality standards? t c. Alteration of local or regional climatic cond itlons, affecting air movement, mo is cure or temperature? 1 4. 81ota ` Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change Sn Che characteristics of species, / • including diversity, distribution, ar number of any species of plants? L b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plan [s? _ ~~~ 'age YES H,1Y3E ;:0 c. Incroduc tion of new or disruptive species of • plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potenclal for agricultural producti ' on . Fauna. Gill the proposal have signif is ant results in: a. Change in the character is tics of species, Sncl ud ir.g diversity, disuiSucion, oz numbers •- • of any species of animals'. ~ b. Reduce ion of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals^. c. Inc mduc[ion of nev of disrup [ive species of anisals into an area, or resale in a barrier Co the migration or movement of anisals? / d. Det er SOratlon or removal of existing fist' or wildlife habitat? 5. Popu lot ion. Will the proposal have sign ifiwnt results in: • a, Gill the proposal alter the Location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth ra [e of [he human population of an area? / L/ i .. b. Will Che proposal affect existing hous i:.g, or / create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio-Economic Factors. Wi11 the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local of regional socio-economic characteristics, including economic et commercial diversity, tax sate, and property values? b. W111 project costs Se equ itab ly distr Sbuted among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, / tar payers or project users? ~ 7. Land Cse and Plannlnz Cons idera[ions. Wilt the proposal have significant cesuics in' a. A subscanclal alteration of [he present or planned land use of an area? b. A conf Llct with any des Sgnat ions, obj ec lives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental ~ entities? __ c. M impact upon Che ~~lai[y or quantity of ' exis eing conaimpcive or non-consumptive ~ recreational opportunities? r ~~ C Page 4 YES MAYSE YO g. Transportation. Will the proposal have signlf Scan[ • results in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movemen c? i 1 b. Ef feces on existing scree [s, or dexand for neW street conscrucrion? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or % demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing [ransporta- cion s stems? y e. Alcerac ions to present patterns of circula- cion or movement of people and/or goods? /' 7 f. Alt erac ions to or effects on present and pocenciai voce r-borne, rail, mass transit or air trafi ic? / g. Inc teases in traffic hazards io mo ter vehicles, 6lcyclis[s or pedes cr Sans'. 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have s ignif Scant res ulis in: • a. Adis [urbance to the integrity o.` as Fneo logical, paleontological, and/or historical resr,:: ces^. / 10. Health, Safety, and \uisante Pa eta rs. W111 the preposai have sSgnif is ant results 1n: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? otential health hazard b Ex os re of eo ie to ? / . p u p p s D c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances Sn the event of an accident? d. M increase in the number of Snd iv idua is or species of vector or patheno gee is organises or the exposure of people co such organ SSCS? / e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to po centially dangerous / noise levels? J/ g. The creation of ob~ec[Sonable odors? / • h. M Sncrease Sn light or glare? v~~ Pa3e 5 C YES :.AYBE NO 11. Aesthetics. WSll [he proposal have slg^. if icon[ • resulcs in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic L vista or view? b. The czeacfon of an ass [helically offensive % site^. - c. A conf lit[ vi th [he objective of de si gna led / or pot en cial scenic tort Sdors^. ._ - 12. Ctllities and Pub lit Services. +111 Che proposal have a significant need for nev sys Gems, or alterations to the following: / a. Elect zit power? - / b. Natural or packaged gas? ? / 1 c. Communications syscevs / d. Water supply? ¢, Was tewa[er facilities? • f. Flood control structures? / g. So11d was [e faci'_i:1es^. _. L h. Fire pro tettlon^. - i. Police protect to n? -- L j. Schools? -!- k. Parks or other recreacfonal fa<ili[1 es? ,~ 1. Ma incenance of public facSl it Ses, including / roads and flood control facilities? /_ m. Other governmental services? ._ L 13. Energv and Scarce Resources. WS11 Che proposal have sign if icanc resulcs in: a a. L'se of sub scan dal of excessive fuel or energy. ,_ / / _- tt 6. Substantial Sncrease in demand upon existing / / sources of energy? - c. M Sncrease in the demand for development of ,~ nev sources of energy? ^- d. M increase or perpetuation of [he consumption of non-renevable forma of energy, when feasible / tenevable sources of energy ere available? _ :~ 17 ( %~ Page 6 e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Findings of Sign if scan e. a. Does the proj a<c have the poeen tial co degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population [o drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plan[ or animal co©unity, reduce [he number or restrict [he range of a rare or endangered plan[ or animal or elimina ce important examples of Che major periods of California his Cory or prehistory? YES '".AYBE YO - - 1 --1 b. Does [he proj ett have the po cential to achieve short-term, to [he disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (,L short-term Impact on the en Vi ronment is one which occurs in a rel atlvely brief, definitive period of tiae while long- term impacts will endure well Snto the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulailvely considerable? (Como la cively cons idezable means rhos the incremental effects of an • indiv Sdual project are considerable when viewed Sn connection with [he effects o`. pas[ projects, and probable future proj ec cs). d. Does the project have environ:,en[a1 effects which will cause substantial adverse effects / on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 1 II. DISCCSSIOV OF EVVIRO6'~'tiTAL EVALtiATIOY (i.e., cE off irmacive answers to [he above questions plus a discussion of proposed mltigac ion measures). • ~ .,.^ y Page III. DETERMINATION . On the basis of this Snlclal evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a signif Scant offect an the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _ I find chat although [he proposed pro}etc could have a algnSflcanc effect on [he environment, [here viii not be a significant effete LJ in [his case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added co the pro; ect. A NEGATI :'E DECLARATION HILL HE PREPARED, r i I find [he proposed project NAY have a signif Scan[ of .'ec[ on the L_, enviznment, and an Eh'1'IRONSLv:7T I>ffALT/~tEPORT Ss regu;=ed. '//'~~ l~ Dace /~' /: Title • rI~ • ORDINANCE NO. .P--2-5-4-0-- 'i/~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PART iit OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH A HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT LOCATED ON 80TH SIDES OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 4TH STREET. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The fallowing section is hereby added to Part III, Development Standards and Guidelines: V. HAVEN AV-cNUE OVERLAY DISTRICT Purpose The purpose of the Overlay District is to establish development standards which address the unique setting and character of the Haven Avenue corridor. The Haven Avenue Overlay District is located on both the east and west sides of Haven Avenue extending from Foothill Boulevard south to 4th Street, as shown in Figure V-1, Applicability The Overlay District is to be applied in conjunction with the Soecif is Plan for Subareas 6 and 7 and provides more specific and/or restrictive develop^~ent policies, design standards and land use regulations for both Subareas 6 and 7. Topics not specifically covered by the Haven Avenue Overlay District will continue to be governed by the regulations of the Specific Plan. Development adjacent to the Haven Avenue Overlay District shall consider compatibility and integration with the Overlay District through the Master Plan process. Setting Haven Avenue is located near the geographic center of the City and will be the most significant gateway into Rancho Cucamonga. Another important aspect is the distinctiveness of the Haven Avenue corridor in relation to other major arterials designated as "Special Boulevards". Haven Avenue is the major travel route for the City and has the potential for high end office development with a unique combination of direct access to the airport and the Interstate 10 freeway. This provides the City a rare opportunity to enhance its image by encouraging intensive, high quality office and professional development along the Haven Avenue corridor. ~ r . J Page 2 Relation to General Plan The General Plan affirms that travel routes are • predominate elements of the community's image and encourages the d~ist inctiveness of individual districts and roadway corridors. In addition, the General Plan states that a consistent design theme is necessary to reinforce the image or perception of a route. The Specific Plan states that the Haven Rvenue corridor and the Industrial Park category should be designed to project a "campus like image for firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment with high prestige value". A, Goal Statement Goals are statements that define the community's aspiration and intentions. The goal for the Haven Avenue corridor has evolved from sessions with the industrial and business communities and with the City's elected and appointed officials. This goal represents the current conception of and future aspirations for the best interest of the City for the Haven Avenue corridor. Encourage long-range master planned development along the Haven Avenue corridor • which enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high quality gateway into the City and by promoting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosphere in a campus like setting with high prestige identity. B. Land Use Tvp es The intent of the following policies is to encourage land uses and development consistent with the design goal for the Haven Avenue corridor as an intensive, high quality gateway into the community. B.1. The primary land use function along Haven Avenue is intended to be of an administrative /p rofession~l and office, nature. 6.2. Select ancillary commerc is lk and business ";~+^ sipport service uses shall not exceed -~~ 20% of the floor area in any Master ~.:~ Page 3 Planned development. Concentration of such uses in any hui ld ing or along the street frontage is not permitted. 3.3. The following land use types are permitted or conditionally permi*_ted within the Haven Avenue Overlay Cistrict. All other uses shall be prohibited. Permitted Uses Administrative and Office Financial, Insurance & Real Estate Services Communication Services Medical/Health Care Services Professional Services Administrative Civic Services Cultural Business Supply Retail Sa~.es & Services Business Support Services Eating and Drinking Establishments Conditional Uses Convenience Sales & Services Entertainment Food and Beverage Sa lesk Hotel/Motel Personal Services Recreation Facilities Public Assembly Public Safety A Utility Services Religious Assembly 'Ancillary Uses limited to 20% of the floor area per 8.2. C. Master Planned Develo^ment The intent of this section is to provide far integrated development at the earliest possible time in the review process. Through the Master Plan process there is opportunity to coordinate the efforts of single or multiple property owners and discourage piecemeal development. The City Planner may require master planning of property outside the Overlay District, adjacent to a Droject proposal, where necessary to assure integrated development and promote the goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The following standards shall apply to all projects and should not 6e constrained by parcel lines or / f Page 4 specific site boundaries: • C.1. A conceptual Master Plan shall he submitted for Planning Commission approval together with any develcpment proposal, including suhd iv ision or parcel map applications, to address harmonious site D1an relationships and potential for shared access and open spaces, and reciprocal parking. Master Plans shall indicate conceptual building pad locations, points of ingress and egress, parking lot configurations, conceptual grading and drainage, landscape and plaza areas, pedestrian circulation, and signs. In addition, a statement of architectural intent and/or conceptual elevations shall adequately specify how the architectural concepts, including style, form, bulk, height, orientation, and materials will meet the intent of the architectural standards and design goal for Haven Avenue. C. 2. The Master Plan boundaries indicated in Figure V-2 are logical planning • boundaries based upon physical contra rots and property ownership. These boundaries may be modified when it is determined that the Master Plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. C.3. No Parcel Map or Subdivision Map shall be accepted or approved without concurrent submittal and approval of a Master Plan to assure integrated development consistent with the goat of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. C.4. Architecture within Master Planned development shall have a compatible design style with variation in the building style, form, and materials in accordance with the architectural standards of the Overlay District. lot Size C.5. Minimum parcel size shall be two (2) acres with a minimum parcel depth of 225 feet within a Master Plan development. • ~ ~ Page 5 • A 300-foot minimum lot width shall also be required, consistent with the access control policies. The Planning Commission may waive these requirements when it is determined that the parcel is part of a Master Plan which is Consistent with the intent and ourpose of the Overlay District. All io is of record are allowed to develop according to the requirements of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Access C.6. Vehicular access onto Haven Avenue shall be discouraged wherever su itah le alternative access may be developed from other streets as determined through the Master Plan process. If vehicular access onto Haven Avenue is granted, said access shall be shared with adjacent parcels. The minimum distance between drive approaches shall be 300 feet with 100 feet the minimum distance between a drive approach and the curb return of any intersection along Haven Avenue. Also, reciprocal parking and • access easements shall be required, where appropriate, with any development proposal. C.7. Public transit facilities shall be considered within all Master Pions. Convenient pedestrian access shalt be provided to designated transit facilities, such as bus stops. C.B. On-site circulation for both pedestrians and vehicles shad consider existing or planned circulation patterns on adjacent properties. Connections shall be made where appropriate to foster more integrated development and enhance pedestrian movement. D. Site Orientation The following standards are intended to promote integrated, pedestrian oriented, office park development in a campus like setting: rr~ l Page 6 Pedestrian Orientation D.1. Site planning, including building . configuration and placement, must create opportunities for courtyards and plazas and other landscaped open spaces and promote safe and convenient pedestrian movement with continuous iandscaped pathways between buildings. 0.2. Parking areas and circulation aisles along the Haven Avenue street frontage are discouraged and may only be approved through the Master Plan process when it is determined appropriate and necessary to implement the design goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Their visual impact shall be fully mitigated through dispersed parking areas and extensive landscaping and herming. D.3. Vehicular circulation arountl the rear and side portions of a site is encouraged. Circulation aisles which fragment or disrupt the connection of pedestrian spaces throughout a project shall be avoided to the extent possible. Parking D.4. The use of dispersed parking areas which • provide convenient access to buildings without interrupting interior pedestrian spaces is encouraged to reduce the need for large parking lots. Where large parking lots are necessary, they shall be located in areas less visible from Haven Avenue and their visual impact fully mitigated with building placement and extensive landscaping and berming. D.5. On-street parking along Haven Avenue shall be prohibited. D.6. Building placement at or near the streetscape building setback is strongly encouraged within all developments, p articu iarly on corner lots with high visihility. Multiple building placement should provide variable streetscape setbacks to reduce streetscape monotony. • %: ~ Page 7 • Setbacks D.7. A 45-foot average landscape setback and a minimum 45-foot building setback shall be required along Haven Avenue, as measured from the ultimate face of curb, including existing lots of record and condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral part of a Master Planned development. D.B. Ancillary service and loading areas shall be designed and located where least visible from public view and adjacent properties designated "Industrial Park". D.9. All existing and new utilities, including electrical service less than 34.5 KV, within the project shall be installed underground. E. Landscaping Requirements The intent of the following standards is to enhance the visual quality of the streetscape and provide an attractive and pleasant working • environment in a campus like setting. Minimum Landscape Coverage E.1. A minimum then ty-five (25) percent of net lot area (excludes right-of-way dedications and private streets) shall be landscaped areas and pedestrian hardscape plazas and courtyards. E.2. The landscape/hardscape coverage requirement may be modified for individual parcels within master planned developments when it is determined that the master plan as a whole meets the required coverage and the project is consistent with the intent and purposes of the design goal for Haven Avenue. E.3. A maximum five (5) percent credit toward the required landscape/hardscape coverage may be permitted where appropriate public art is to be displayed in a setting which enhances pedestrian spaces and building architecture. '~O Page 8 E.4. A consistent st reetscape design theme • shall be developed along the Haven Avenue streetscape which incorporated intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, alluvial rockscaoe, mounding, meandering sidewalks, and appropriate street furniture. L andscap my materials shall be selected which provide an historic link to the City's past, such as eucalyptus windrows, citrus trees, and grape vines. In addition, a program of street name monument signs shall be developed Lo include low profile, natural a;luvial rock monument signs with individual letters formed in a sandblasted concrete face. Berming E.5. Landscaping and berming shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the streetscape, enhance building architecture, screen utilities and huffer views of automobiles, pavement and service areas, and to define and to distinguish the pedestrian environment from vehicular spaces. . Water Conservation E.6. A combination of water conserving landscape and irrigation techniques are required such as the use of draught tolerant plant species and hard sc ape (non-irrigated) surfaces, and special irrigation systems such as drip emitters, low volume stream rotors, deep watering of trees and shrubs, tensiometers to measure soil moisture, and automatic timers. E.7. Landscape materials shall be selected for their low maintenance, drought tolerance, and heat and wind tolerance. F. Open Space and Pedestrian Environment The intent of this section is to promote the functional design and location of pedestrian spaces, and provide convenient pedestrian circulation on and off site and promote a campus like setting. s ~:; Page 9 • F.1. The development of a pedes±r ion node or focal point, such as a plaza or courtyard is required within all projects. F.2. The location of plazas and courtyards should encpurage maximum pedestrian use and be separated and/or buffered from vehicular parking and circulation. Such locations may be near a prominent building entrance or along a centralized pedestrian path. Pedestrian Facilities F.3. Pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall be designed to create an attractive, comfortable, and functional setting with a "sense of place". A comh inat ion of the following design elements are encouraged, but are not limited to: pavement or surface texture; elevation/grade changes; use of landscape materials and structures to provide shade and define enclosed spaces; seating (eg - benches, steps, or raised planters); and outdoor eating • areas. In addition, the use of water features, covered walkways, and public art are encouraged. F.4. Trash receptacles, drinking fountains, light standards and other street furniture shall be designed to enhance the appearance and function of open space areas. F.5. Convenient pedestrian circulation shall 6e provided throughout all projects to connect parking areas and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open spaces. G. Architecture The following standards are intended to promote a high quality office park image with high prestige identity: Urban Style G.1. Desirable architecture along Haven Avenue shall project a high quality progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development. White the use of a variety of exterior materials may be ,~ ': ~r ~ .. Page 10 permitted to achieve this image; • Spanish, Mediterranean, or traditional architecture styles are not generally considered appropriate far office buildings. G.2. Variations in architectural styles, construction methods, and materials for certain ancillary uses, such as restaurants and banks, may he permitted where the architecture is exemplary and consistent with the high quality image required for Haven Avenue and where a particular design is necessary and more appropriate considering the intended use of the building. Multiple Story G. 3. Multiple story buildings of sufficient mass are encouraged that reflect the scale and oroport ion of the Haven Avenue right-of-way and streetsc ape setbacks. Low, linear buildings are discouraged. G. 4. Building design elements that are considered inappropriate for an office park atmosphere include retail type • storefront elevations (linear configurations, continuous glazing, multiple doorways), and numerous overhead roll-up doors which promote concentrations of ancillary commercial and business support services, and are therefore prohibited. G.S. Service and loading areas shall be screened from public view and adjoining properties, wherever possible, to reduce site design constraints on future adjacent development. Architectural Variety G. 6. Architectural planes shall have variation in depth and angle to create variety and interest in the basis form and silhouette of the building. G. 7, Articulation of the elevation surfaces is encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns and provide variety in the building plane or surf ate. • 1,f ~J Page 11 • G.B. Building entrances shall 6e well articulated and project a formal entrance statement through variation of architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscaped plazas. G.9. Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjunction with variation in the major form giving elements of a structure. Signs G. 10. A coordinated Uniform Sign Program shall 6e required for any development, including wall and monument signs. Building wall signs shall consist of individual letters and can signs are prohibited. The size, number, typical design and location of the signs, as permitted by the City's Sign Ordinance, shall be submitted with the development application and be reviewed concurrently. N. Urban Centers • The following standards are intended to promote the highest quality deve lopmen[ and intensity to create community focal points or "urban centers" near the key intersections of 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard, as shown in Figure V-1. N.1. The applicability of these urban center standards for specific parcels shall be determined through the Master Plan review process. M.2. Multiple story office and professional buildings of the highest design quality are required, particularly at the immediate corners of 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. Oes irah le structural components include steel, and concrete in conjunction with curtain walls, spandrels and glass. Wood frame structures are discouraged. Page 12 H.3. A minimum thirty (30) percent of net lot • area (excludes right-of-way dedications and private streets) shall be land;c aped areas and pedestrian hardscape plazas or c0ur [yards. N.4. Special landscaping and streetscape design features shall be developed for the intersections at 4th and Foothill to create an intensive and prestigious gateway =_n try into Rancho Cucamonga and the Haven Avenue Avenue Corridor. H.6. The use of parking structures is encouraged to promote intensified development and maximize the site area devoted to urban pedestrian plazas and courtyards. Prrk ing structures shall be harmoniously designed with the main building and located around the rear or side portions of the site. H.6. The minimum parcel size shall be five (5) acres unless waived by the Planning Commission when it is determined that the parcel is designed as an integral • part of a T~3ster planned development consistent with the intent and purpose of the Overlay District. SECTION 2: The City Council finds that Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendments cn implementation of the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan goals and policies and that the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan Environmental Impact Reports adequately cover any potential significant adverse impacts. Further, the City Council finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. Specifically, the City Council. A. No substantial changes are proposed in any goals or policies which would require major revisions to the EIR's. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken. No new information on the project has become available. SECTION 3: The I4ayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Da i~l Rye or~t, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • ~/ ~~ • • - CITT OF RA1CH0 CtiC.ay10\G.A STAFF REPORT DAiE: February 6, 1985 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil. Senior Planner ~~~~' ~~ y 3 \'' _ w.~ >_ :.J" F _ Z V- SUBJECT: ENV I~4ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-O4A - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A General Plan Amendment from Office to Industrial Park for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208-331 -01, 12, 13, and 208-341-O1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT GISTRICT AMENDMENT 8 -0 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A Development District Amendment from OP (Office/Professional) to ISP (Industrial Specific Plan) and MH (14-24 du/ac) for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven riven ue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208-331-01, 12, 13, and 208- 341-01. ENV IRONh1ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - An amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan to expand the boundaries of Subarea 7 (Industrial Park category) to include ao proximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208-331-01, 12, 13 and 208-341-01. BACKGROUND: These three items are presented in conjunction with the review of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The intent is to simplify the implementation of the Overlay District by including all of the overlay area within the Industrial Specific Plan. This will eliminate duplication of the Overlay District in the Development Code and provide consistency relative to base district standards and zoning. In addition, future changes and refinements of the Overlay District can be handled through modifications of the Industrial Specific Plan only, with no need to amend other documents. r _ T CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT General Plan Amendment 84-04A February 5, 1585 • The Planning Commission held a series of public hearings on these items starting in October of 1984, and recommends approval of all three items in conjunction with approval of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. A detailed Planning Commission Staff Report is attached for your review and consideration. I[. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: To approve the proposed Amendments, the City Council should make the following findings: A. That the amendments are consistent with the intent of the General Plan Land Use Policies; and B. That the amendments promote the goals of the Land Use Element; and C. That the amendments would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Oaity Report newspaper, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against the proposed amendments. IV. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City . Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 84- 04A. Adopt Ordinance approving Development District Amendment 84-04 (1st reading only, February 6, 1985). 3. Adopt Ordinance approving Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 84-02 (1st reading only, February 6, 1985). Res pK Ctf idly Sapmitted, Planner OK:cv Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report with Exhibits Resolution of Approval • Ordinances (2) ! ' , • ....-..., ., .,.~ ...... STAFF REPORT .... LLi.n.M1rO . ~~?=~~~9 ~~ ~ ^~ - OATE: December 12, 1984 __ ~0 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commi ssion FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 8Y: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE SMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-04A - HAVEN AVF NUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A General Plan Amendment from Office to Industrial Park for approx imately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208-331-01, 12, 13, and 208-341-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MEN M N - HAV N AVENU V RLAY D R - A Oeve opment District endment from OP (Office/Professional) to [SP (Industrial Specific Plan) and MH (14-24 du/ac) for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 20fl-331 -01, 12, 13, and 208- 341-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84-0 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - An amendment to the Industr is pec ific Plan to expand the boundaries of Subarea 7 (Industrial Park category) to include approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District -APN 208-331-01, 12, 13 and 208-341-01. I. BACKGROUND: These three items are presented in conjunction with the adoption of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The intent is to simplify the implementation of the Overlay District by including all of Lhe study area within the Industrial Specific Plan. This will eliminate duplication of the Overlay District in the Development Code and provide consistency relative to base district standards and zoning. At the November 14th meeting, the Planning Commission received public input and disc ssed Lhe three land use amendments and indicated their concurrence with Lhe proposed amendments. Therefore, adoption of the attached Resolutions recommending approval to the City Council would be appropriate. ' T / ITEMS J, K, L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Overlay District December 12, 1984 Paqe 2 II. SIT`e DESCRIPTION: A. Location: West side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway. B. Parcel Size: Approximately 40 acres. C. Exist inq Zoning: OP (Office/Professional) D. Exist inq land Use: Grapevines exist on the majority of site with a house and barn located on the south side of Foothili Boulevard near the Oeer Creek Channel. E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Virginia Dare 'dinery, GTE Building, zoned General Commercial. South - Old La Mancha Golf Course, zoned ISP (Industrial Park, Subarea ]). East - Office Building and County Law and bus tice Center under construction, zoned ISP (Industrial Park, Subarea 7); K-Mart, zoned ISP (Commerciai, Subarea 1). • West - Grapevines, Deer Creek Channel, zoned MH (Medium-High Residential, FC (Flood Control), OP (Office/Professional). F. General Ptan Des ignat ions: Project Site - Office North - Commercial South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park, Commercial West - Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/ac), Flood Control, Dffice. III. ANALYSIS: The subject property represents a critical portion of the Haven Avenue Corridor. Development of the site under the Overlay District standards will help create an "urban center" and provide a significant gateway into the corridor. As mentioned previously, the proposed amendments will provide a consistent base district for all of the study area and simplify implementation of the Overlay District standards. • PLANNING COMM ISSiDN STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Overlay District December 12, 1984 Page 3 • The subject property is shown on Exhibit "A". Year the northwest corner of Arrow Highway and Haven Avenue the Current District boundary between OP and MH follows an existing property line 659' west of Haven Avenue. The proposed boundary between the ISP and MH Districts, however, is 310' closer to Naven for consistency with Tentative Parcel Map 8345, recently approved by the Planning Commission (see Exhibit "8"). The revised boundary is necessary to avoid splitting a future parcel between land use districts, and will add approximately 9.5 acres to the Medium High Residential District (14-24 du/ac). To mitigate potential concerns for proper land use transition and buffering, a condition of the Parcel Map requires a master plan to be processed concurrently with any development application submitted on the property. IV. ENV IRO NME^1TAL ASSESSMENT: The Initial Study, including the env ironmental Checklist, has been completed and staff found no substantial evidence to indicate significant environmental impacts will result from approval of the proposed amendments. The followwing is a summary of the major environmental factors considered by Staff during preparation of the Initial Study. If Lhe Commission concurs with Staff's findings, a recommendation to • the City Council for approval of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Traffic. The land use change from Office to Residential on the 9.5 acre portion of the site should reduce tr off is volume counts by an estimated 1,220 daily trips. This estimate is based upon bu ildout of the 9.5 acres at the mid-point of the density range (i.e., 19 du/ac ). Drainag e. Water runoff should be approximately six (6) percent less if the property is built out under the proposed land use designations. The reduction is attributable to the lesser amount of impervious surfaces if the land use on the 9.5 acre portion of the site is ultimately multiple family residential versus office or industrial. Schools. Development of the 9.5 acre residential portion of the site would generate approximately 54 additional students (based on buildout at 19 du/ac). General Plan Consistency. The proposed Development District Amendment will not create a technical inconsistency with the General Plan, since the Land Use Map is general in nature and exact zone houndaries are determined by the Development District Map. ,. __ K PLANNIYG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Maven Avenue Overlay District December 12, 1984 Page 4 • V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: To approve the Amendments, the Commission should cake the fol Towing findings: A. That the amendments are consistent with the intent of th=_ General Plan Land Use Policies; and 8. That the amendments promcte the goals of the Land Use Element; and C. That the amendments would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing inin h~Daily RReport newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. To date, no written corrspondence has been received either for or against the proposed amendments. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission adopt the attached Res Ttions recommending approval Lo the City Council of ~he propo~sejd Amendments and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Re s~eCtfjtlly^sG6mitted, • ~ ~ i ,, Rickl Gomez City P er RG: OC:ns I Attachments: Exhibit "A" - location Map Exhibit "B" - Haven Avenue Overlay District Map Initial Study, Part II Resolutions • ^t r ~- 5 uB I.S.P. FI6. IV"~ _ _ _ __. C~ ulitTli LIT 1• (~I' ITf ~I ~VE'n1 AVE. AMEhII~MErY75 r~ R.1\CH() Ci:C:1~ IO\G:1 TITLr. -~. Dlsr. n~ ~ I . s . PLA\\i\G UI\'L~IOV E\f IlI)IT .$`SC:\LE• h ~. DEO~LOPMENT DISTRICT I..AP C nrhw[o 1EIRnnvE PARCEL MAP. NO. 8345 m< <:.. a, . ..a.<. a,...,.., ;;;aa „~.~ ~.~r "~ ~ ;rrt ~ r."•ni~ ~r. i,i ¢~ ', ~ .~.C_ // i. _. .,,, "3^ ~ ~~ ~=~ii:K IY. ::..::.t..l .. l dy=Rl-A't D1S'7KIG'f QpuNR-~K'7r ' LINE oUaWKi. k ~~ PROPOSEDrI/SP BOUNDARY ,. ~:~-rte: =-- ~ o'er' c lI ',.., J.pp ~Siiiiliiiiiiii~~~^i~~/~~0~~~~0 ~' i Future City ~- < - - i Hall ` -~ .. " ~ ~~ P.M .B34s \ORTH CI I'I OI' ITEM: F1AVEn1 A`/t<. AM eN bMEtiITC • R.-1\CHO CL'CAJIO~(~.1 TITLE GVERtAYaypcr ~ouNioaR.Y PLANNI\~G DI\'ISIO~i EXIIIRIT~ ~r81~ SCALE - ~~C~ • clrx of gavcHO cvcA.yovcA PART II - INITIAL STl^JY esti•Ixo:v~;;rAL cxecxLlsr DArE: A.oPLI C.::- FIL r)7G DA \Z ;,E PECSECr LDCArIG\: Gins ~~_ hLs r~ ~t~C ~, ~,y~y~ ,I I. E~Z'LHO\'w/\r iL I:~ACrS / T=.~- (EZplanaclon a.' all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). ~~ g'q"° ~ _Yri N ti0 • 1. Sot's and Gecio e.. Hill [he proposal have s:gr.i Cl ca Lt results ln: a. L'ns:ab:e grou^d conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Dis;options, displacements, compaction or ` burial of [he soil? ~ c. Change in topography or ground surface T contour ince teals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? ~ e. Any potential increase in wind or eater erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site condito ns' ~ f. Changes in erosion siltation, or daposition^. g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- - slides, ground fallu re, or similar hazards? h. An increase in [he race of extrac[Son and/or use of any mineral resource? 2. Hydrology. Hill the proposal have significant resui [s in: 4D J ~ ( ?age 2 YES MAYBE \0 a. Changes in currents, oT the course of direction • of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral scream channels? ~ b. Changes in absorption races, drainage patxerns, or the rate and amount of surface eater tunof .". f, C, AlCera[lOns to Che COUCSe OL flow 02 f10od va ters? d. Change in [he amount of surface water in any body of water'. e. Discharge Sn to surface va [ers, oz anv al[erat ion of surface vacer quality? L f. Al Cerat ion of grounduacer cha rat terisclcs? ~ g. Change in the quantity cf greundwaters, either through direct additions or vich- drawals, or through in cerference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? ~ h. The reduction Sn the amount of vacer o:ner- • wise available for pub Sic vacer supplic;'. i i. Exposure of people or property to water i related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 1 3. Air Ouali tt•. Will the proposal have SSgnif Scant res uits in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile ~ or indirect Sources? _, _ , St acionary sources? f b. Deter Lorat ion of amb Sent air quality and/or interference with the attainment of applicable t i li d d ? ~. a r qua ty s an ar s c. A1Ceratlon of local or regional climatic cond itian5, affectSng air movement, volsCU re " or tempe rata re? _' 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change 1n the cbaracterls tics of species, • including diversity, dis [ribu[lon, or number ~ of any species of planes? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare ~ ~~ or endangered species of planes? r ~' C - c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. 'rill the proposal have sign if icanc results in: a. C:;ange in the characteristics of species, lnclud ing diversity, dis tt Sbution, or numbers o: any species of anima ls? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of antmals? c. Incxoduttion of nev or disruptive species of anima is Sato an area, or result in a barTieL co [he migration or movemenC of animals'. d. Deter ioratien or reaoval of existing fish oT vildl ife habitat? 5. Poou:a[ic ~. Will the proposal have significant LeSU~ita ln: • a. I: il: the proposal alter the location, d,strl_ button, density, divers icy, or grow [h rate o: the human population of an area? h. Wi11 the proposal of .`ect existing housing, or create a demand for add iti0nal housing: 6. Soc io--economic Factors. Will the proposal have s igr.if is an: results in: a. Change in local or regional sotto-economic char acteriscics, including economic or commercial diversity, [ax rate, and proper c7 values? b. Will project costs be egait ab ly discribu ced among project benef is Sarles, S.e., buyers, tax payers or project users'. 7. Land use and Plann in¢ Considerations. Will [he preposal have signif icanc resin cs in'. a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict vlch any designations, objectives, po llciea, or adopted plans of any governmental ent Sties? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of exfating consumptive Ot non-consumptive recreational opportunities? r~ y ~ `3 $Z YES `"AY3E VO - L i I _. ~ f- i - _ L -- {- /i~ ~_ .,L C ~ Page 4 YES NAYHE VO 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant • results Sn: a. Generation of substantial addltlonal vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new scree[ canscruc[SOn? c. Effects on existing parking facLL•'cies, or demand for new parking? ~ d. Substantial Impact upon existing [ranspor[a- [Son systems'. L e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods^. ~ f. Alterations [o or effects on present and ~ potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or air Graff ic? T g. Increases Sn traffic hazards to motor vehicles, b icyclis [s or pedestrians? _ ~ 9. Cultural Resources. Will the preposal have sigr.ificanc results in: • a. A disturb ante to the ince 3ri[y o: archaeo log icai, paleontological, and/or historical resources^. 10. Health, Safety, and \uisance Factors. Will the proposal have signif is ant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health / hazard? / 1 b. Ezp osure of people [o potential health hazards? 1 c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances 1n the even[ of an accident? _. d. M increase Sn the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic - organisms or the exposure of people to such ~ organists'. 1 v l ? i l i i s i/ se e e s ng no e in ex st e. Increa f. Exposure of people eo potentially dangerous (' noise levels? _ g. The <reacion of obJec[ionable odors? / / • h. M increase in light or glare? 1 ~ 7 ~ .. ` Page i YES vAYBE VO • 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? 4 L 6. 'Lhe creaCion of an aesthetically offens Sve site? 4 ~ c. A conflict with the obj eccive of desi gna ced or potential scenic corridors? 12. L'c i!it ies and Pu611c Services. Will [he proposal have a signif icanc need for new systems, or alterations to [he following: a. Electric power? ~ b. Natural or packaged gas? ^ c. Communica [ions sys [ems . d. Water supply? 1 e. Wastewater facilities? 1 F f d ^ • . loo control structures . g. Solid was ce facilities^ !~ F h ? . ire pro ce ct ion i. Police protection? L ]. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? L 1. Hair.[ enance of public facilities, including / roads and flood control Eac ilicies? _ m. Other governmental services? 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have sign iEicanc results in: a. L'se of suhscancial or ex cesslve fuel or energy? _ 1 b. Subs can tial Increase Sn demand upon existing / sources of energy? c. M increase in the demand for development of / new eaurces of energy? 1 d, M increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non-renewable forms of energy, when feas lb le ~ renewable sources of energy ere evailab le? _ ~ -~ C C e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Handacmry Findin¢s of SE¢n if stance. a. Does the project have the potential co degrade the quality of the env Sronment, substantially reduce [he habitat of Elsh or wildlife species, cause a fish or vildllfe population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten [o eliminate a plan[ or animal community, seduce the number ar restrict the range of a rare or endangered plan[ or animal of eliminate Important examples of Che major periods of California history or preh is[ory~ page 6 YES ?fAYBE NO L • b. Does the prmj etc have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact an the environment is one which occurs In a relatively brief, definitive period of Cime while long- term impacts will endure veil ineo [he future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limf [ed, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumula cively considerable • means [hat the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). d. Does Che project have envizonmen cal effects vhich will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or fodirectly? ~' II. DIS CCSSI09 OF ESl'IAO'ilff9TA1 EVALL'ATIOV (i.e., of affimacive answers co the above questions plus a discussion of proposed sicigation measures). Y Paee i C i III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initia'_ evaluation: • I find the proposed project COUID NOT have a signlf scan[ effecc ~ ` on the environment, and a NEGATII'E DECLARATION will be prepared, _ I find that although the proposed project could have a eignlficanc effect on the environment, [here will no[ be a significant effecc ~1 in this case because the mitigation measures descrlb ed on an a[[athed sheet hav¢ been added [o the prof ect. A NECATA'E DECLARATION WILL HE PREPARED. C I find [he enviznmenc, pzoposed prof ect !fA`! and an ENVIRON?ff.AT have a signif scan[ ef_`ecc on the wired. I}lPACT °P Daze /~ ~ ,~~- ~ ,c _~ ~ ! _ r _. • '4 RESOLUTION N0.-P~2-b-~R'~ '~' '~ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -04A - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO IN D'JSTRIAL PARK FOR, APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SI OE OF HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN F00THI L'- 90ULEVARD AND ARROW HIGHWAY - AP N'S: 208-331-01, 12, 13 AND 208-341-01. 'WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission is recommending approval of the above-descrihed General P1 an Amendment; and, 'WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 55854 of the California Government Code; and, 'dH EREAS, GPq 84-04A is necessary to effectively implement the Haven Avenue Overlay District. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has made the following findings: 1. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the General Plan land Use Policies. 2. The amendment promotes the goals of the Land Use Element. 3. The amendment will not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cuc amnion ga City Council has found that this General P a~~l n Amendment will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration is hereby issued. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that General Plan Amendment 84-04A, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A", is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED, and RDOPTED this 6th day of FEBRUARY, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mike s, Mayor 7~ ' w ORDIAANCE N0.-?--2~6'?'R'- • AN OROIYANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN L0., APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT ND. 84-04 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY 0[STRICT - A CHANGt` IN THE OiS TRICT DESIGNATION FROM OP TO ISP A"1D MH FOR APPROXIMATELY 40 AC.°.ES OF LAND LOCATEfl ON THE 'REST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, BET'dEEN FOOTH Il.L BOULEVARD AND ARRO'd HIGH'AAY - APN: 203-331-O1, 12, 13 ANO 206-341-01. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing he id in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the above-described Development District Amendment, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distr itts and the Haven Avn eue Overlay in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and, C. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor Che surrounding properties; and, D. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. E. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTS ON 2; the subject real property is hereby rezoned in accordance with Exhibit "A" and the Development District Map is hereby amended accordingly. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the Ctty of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. L; v J ORDINANCE N0. P-2-6--38 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - EXPANDING THE BOUNDARY OF SUBAREA 7 (INDUSTRIAL PARK CATEGORY) TO INCLUDE APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE 'BEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, BET'dEEN FOOTHILL 80ULEVARD AND ARROW HIGHWAY - AP'1 2D8-331-01, 12, 13, ANO 208-341-01. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the above-described Industrial Specific Plan Amendment, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. • B. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the Haven Avenue Overlay District and in Subarea 1 (Industrial Park Category) in terms of attess, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and, C. That the proposed Industrial Specific Plan Amendment would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and, D. That the proposed Industrial Specific Plan Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. E. This amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The subject real property is hereby redesignated in the manner stated, and the Industrial Specific Plan is hereby amended accordingly. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shalt cause the same to be published within fifteen (1S) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. l ^/l Y 4 • • CITI" OF RANCHO CL'Cd3t0\G:1 STAFF REPORT GATE: February 6, 1985 TD: Mayor and Members of the City Council PROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: !isa A. 'Ain roger, Assistant Planner ~~~=/~ ~~"tr, ~~ ~~~ 9 Z -_ j c ZL = __-q ~_ ___-~ S U3JECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL 9Y INLAND MEDIATION 30AR0 TO PARTICIPATE IA SNARED HOU I9G FOR E9I ORS PROGRAM BACKGROUND: Since 1982, the Lity has utilized Block Grant funds to contract for landlord/tenant information and mediation with Inland Mediation 9oard (IM8), a nonprofit organization which contracts with many cities in the region to provide these services. Recently, IM3 submitted a request to the City for funding to contribute to the initiation costs of a Shared Housing for Seniors program. This program would provide a free service to senior citizens, catching seniors in need of housing with others who wish *_o share their hope and housing costs. This service is extremely helps rl to senior homeowners who wish to remain in their homes but need ass is`. ante with housing costs and in many cases provides companionship for beth parties. The Drags am also provides displaced senior citizens an off prd able alternative to living alone. Similar programs exist in Riverside, Santa Ana and Garden Grove. Housing matches occur through a computerized system with preliminary interviews and counseling Conducted by Inland '^ediation Board staff. Inland Mediation Board has requested an allocation of 55,000 of 91o ck Grant funds over the next two years as .Rancho Cucamonga's share of the regional cost, based on the number of senior citizens residing in the area. The program will operate on a regional basis with housing matches ocuirring throughout the western San Bernardino County region. Financial support will be provided by a State grant, with matching funds from the region's cities, many of which have agreed to support the program. Although requests for allocation of 31ock Grant funds usually occur in March and April when public hearings are held for the upcoming Black Grant program year, iM9 is requesting a commitment to allocate funds prior to Nor rh 1 to be eligible for State matching funds. Rancho Cuc amon ga's 55,000 allocation aou ld have to be reprogrammed from the 1983/85 contingency fund of 514,950 through a public hearing held at the first Council meeting in March. r~~ x Inland Mediation 3oard Shared Housing for Seniors Program February 6, 1985 Page 2 • RECOMMENDATION: Given the relatively low cost of participation in the program and evidence of its effectiveness in other localities, staff and the City's 31ock Grant consultant, Cotton/Beland/Associates recommend tentative approval of Inland Mediation Board's request for $5,000 for the Shared Housing for Seniors program. A letter of intent to participate in the program is attached Lo this report. Should Council approve the request, the letter of intent will require the mayor's signature. In addition, a public hearing will be scheduled for the first Council meeting in March in order to officially reprogram funds from the contingency fund to the Shared Housing for Seniors program. Resp ec tful }y submitted, is ome~~ ity ner RG: Lil: jr Attachments: Letter from Inland Mediation Board Dated December 21, 1984 Letter of Intent . • v ^~~ `Inland Mediation Board DEC 2 i i98 afJ PR December ?.1, 1984 Mr. Otto Kroutil ' Community Development Department ' Planning Divls ion . ~ P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Kroutil, Inland Mediation Board would like the City of Rancho Cucamonga to consider '. expanding their social services to [he community by adding the Shared Housing ~ , for Seniors program. This type of service is not actively Being done in this area. Inland Mediation Board would offer a free service to those displaced '' senior citizens who have no home because they have been priced out of the ' • housing market. Due to increasing financial distress, many seniors citizens see shared housing as a viah le alternative. This program will help the senior co reduce housing costs by matching with other compatible individuals in the , San Bernardino County ores. The program would follow ehe stace guidelines. According to 1984 Rancho Cucamonga population figures [he senior count is SX of total population. The state will fund [his two year program for a [Deal of $50,000 asking the County ' and cities within the area to match funds. This means Inland Mediation Board ~'~.a ' has co raise $50,000 for the 1985-1987 fiscal years from the local communities. , If Rancho Cucamonga would like to par ticipace $5,000 would be their approximate :p.~' C .. share. .,. 'iy{+~('= Our organization would be glad to meet with you to discuss this program if ,~~;!: ~r 4' ' there are any questions or problems. Rancho Cucamonga's cooperation is an " +"~~~ ` f.mpor[ane Eactor in the total success. " ' Yoy~u(~r~(s/~"Lt/~/r/-uJl~~~~~~! ` 4 ,2iGiY/~,//LLY//~ ~ . ., . a p ' Betty Davldow . i .,; + Executive Director ',~~, :~~;' "'~ L..~ ,Ti,['~H ... ~ ~ ": !.~fh 1i ~, A.... •v i 1 ~ .. ' '• R: ~Js~ ~, q ' ~ ~L ,,~. 9fi17 Ar rnw Nighway Su1tC "B',~Aan¢ho_Cucamonga ~CA 97J30 ' 4R1N141~fQ~0m0( • p74) 987.8883 • (800) 3271 =s CITY OF R:1VCH0 CLC'a~10\GA STAFF REPORT 7ATE: February o, 1955 T0: City Council and City Planager fRCM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer S L'6 CECT: HLTA LO'^A CHANNEL ASS ES SSIENT DISTRICT D4-2 BACKGR OL'"JD ~ c~c:xsrgtir t.~9 z _~~ ~ z _ C Z -- ~„- --~ Attached for Council action are a number of resolutions required to initiate the formation process for the revised Alta Loma Channel Assessment District. Key actions include preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report, authorization to solicit construction and bond bids and the setting the public hearing for March 20, 1985. DISTRICT 30 UiJ DARY The District boundaries are delineated on the attached area map and included in a larger scale moo attached to the Engineer's Report. The 6o undary encompasses only those lands northerly of the Alta Loma Basins tributary to the Alta Loma Channel project which have prev busty received development approvals of some type. The cu n~ent boundary differs from the most recent revisions (see attached Staff Reports) by exclusion of tracts southerly of Alta Loma Basins and the exclusion of the Church properties located at the northeast corner of Archibald and 'dilson Avenues. Those properties southerly of the basin have been required to install significant interim protection measures and will pay ordinary drainage fees. It was felt further obligation would have been inequitable. The Church property subsequent to our previous hearings has begun construction and paid drainage fees which will be contributed to the project. PETITIONS RECEIVED The current District is comprised of 225 acres of which GO% is contained in tracts owned by Dick Scott, Inc., The Anden Group, and Crismar Development Corporation. We have received petitions from each of these parties consenting to the District and waiving requirements for a Oebt Report. One of your actions will be to accept these petitions by Resolution. The remaining property owners are aware of the District and with two exceptions, have not voiced objections. The two questionable properties are associated with Phi to Biane. Mr. biome in the past parceled his property and sold a portion on which a tentative tract map has keen filed. Both of these approvals conditioned participation in the Assessment District. It should be noted that Drainage Fees will be waived upon approval of the District. CITY COU^1CIL STAFF REPORT Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 84-2 f ehru ary 6, 1985 Page 2 • ESTIMATES ANO ASS`_SShiE NTS The Cistrict cost estimate is delineated in the Engineer's Report and totals $3,055,850. As currently structured, the District and bond sale will fund $1,728,512, the County will fund $437,559 and the City will contribute $889,780. Included in the City rnn±rihut ion is the contingency fund of $95,027 and the bond reserve fund of 5172,851. The City will retain the reserv_ fund in trust for debt service until termination of the District. 'We will be able to expend interest on that fund in the administration of the District. Of the remaining City funds, $275,753 will be assigned to can struction of the channel crossings at Hillside Road and Wilson Avenue and to the improvement of Hermosa Avenue at the Hlta Loma Basins. These prcj ects are included in this year's budget to he funded with Systems Development funds. Of the remaining incidental costs of $346,139, approximately $254,000 has al ready been expended from the Drainage fee fund on Engineering for the project. The District amount to bond of $1,728,512 results is the same assessment as previously noticed under Assessment Distri cY 82-2. ih is amount will remain fixed upon receipt of bids. Any increase or decrease in costs would be ref lerted in the City and County portions of the project . The table below summarizes the previous information: • ALTA LOh1A CHANNEL COST SUMMARY ASSESSMENT D[SL4I CT CITY COUNTY TOTAL $1,729,512 $889,780 $437,559 $3,055,851 COST ANALYSIS CIiY CONTRIBUTION 1. Hillside Rd., Wilson Ave., Hermosa Ave. $275,763 2. Incidental Engineering E346,139 3. Reserve Fund (Loan) $172,851 4. Construction Contingency Fund $95 027 TOTAL $b FUP1D EXPENDED TO DATE $254 000 BA LANCE 635, 80 FUNDING SOURCES SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND STORM DRA IN FUNDS COUNTY CONTRIBUTION l • 1. Hermosa Equa izer Culvert $212,559 2. Construction Administration, Inspection, Survey, etc. $225 000 TOTAL 43 ,5 9 f. - .~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Alta Loma Channel Assessment District 84-? February 6, 1985 • Page 3 PROJECT IMPACT The prooosed project will provide drainage and flcod protection for the properties within the District boundary, provide safe improved road crossings and reduce flows in Hermosa Avenue in normal storms. The praj ect 6y no means ful iy mitigates the potential impact of future development tributary to Hermosa Avenue. To further address this issue, we will be proposing that further development participate in completion of the original project through payment of fees and further excavacation of the Alta Loma basins. These policies will return to the Council with the Storm Dain toaster Plan and fee revisions in the near future. PROJECT SCHEDULE o City Council authorization to hid and to form Assessment District 84-? - February 6, 1985 o Opening of construction bids - March 7, 1985 o Second Council meeting, confirmation of assessments and final protest hearing/award bids - March 20, 1985 • o End of cash collection - April 21, 1985 o Date of the bonds - May 2, 1985 o Closing - May 9, 1985 o Start of construction - play 9, 985 o Completion of construction plus or minus -February 1985. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends proceeding with the District and adoption of the necessary resolutions. Respectfully submitCp2f, c~~ i v ~~~~ti~~ `~ LBH: J J Attachments r<~ Y . ~ ~"";r ;..• r " ~. ~-. ~- ,J -~ `-..--- --- -~- _ .~ L.,- .. K aW ~ ~7 s: ~; l~ f .`n ~~~ I ~ i i _/ .2Y~'. L L ^I~rY a Cam o- Page 11 ~t=:''J ^;,`^,~r~„$;~ B E Rti~. ,R D3'V O' Y ~ ~~~~__ Ali N ~-'- / n ~ NA~10A~}, .IrO ftPST ``r- J / • ~\~ _ ,i' ~- J ~. J sr--~~-- --~I ~, siaE' ~ :-_~~ _ -_- -~ - _ - -- -- ~~,~. - ..~~ Y~' ~=.i-' '~ ~, , „~ .. '1 •' `I 1~ 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 ~~ "'-~c-~ ~~RJ-=xe n= ~' rA' `~' n ~/ az ._ 4 ; d S..a. 1~ C ® EXCLU0E0 Project Area Legend: Proposed AsaesemerK Dfstrtct i34-2 ~ ~ ~ Proposed Dietrkt BourWery • Figure No. Donaltl G. King antl Associates i" -~ Pace I4 • 3B; .. aa..g1.....oq _ .. _._ ~~ :q ~ ~ _ ' i _ ~ 1'~ I. ~ y„« ,i ~~~ ~ ~ ~;~~ , +( '{ ~ ,NEW DEBRIS BASIN ~ CHANNEL "`-' ~ '~' u•••:•n.o'~RASIN NO. 31 _ AND EXCAVATION ~ IMPROVEMENTS ~.=~. ~ r ' ~i : .+~ .~ .,. Wuu .. ~ T~ woq// NEW CULVERT AND r ., _ - 'STREET IMPROVEMENTS-^ier-r .__, / ' I. NEW \ /.. ~ / CHANNEL ~ ~i z STOgM DRgIN=_ ~ -~ - ~= ~ ~ IMPROVEMENTS I, _ ;.~, . i--~ •~ ~ ~~~ ' ~ -~ ` punn.'A NEW EOUALIgTt I : ~ ,~ ~ C '` CULVERT 8 STREET I ~--- y _.;; w _ MPROVEMENT51 _-4. _ 3 I -='+ ~'~3 -=. OUTLET PIPE pip N .( ~~ _--..__ ._~. NEY1L .:~~, EXCAVATION :.; :.~-`S'I '}~ ILLWAY-~:a:~~~:~?c: J:.~ ~;~ ~~ SP ~~ ' ~' ~ ~ ' , : _ ~ ~ ~'_ ~ n K" : v ~ ~ ~i i ~~ ~'1 .fit T tl ~' I ~ - .-s _ } I 11 '~~%i y 1'-" ~- groject Components 4 Flqure No. Oonaltl G, King and Associates ' ~ :7 -- - - CITI" OF Ra VCHU CCCAIIUAC~1 i~c~,~t~ STAFF REPORT ~° " ` ~ r ~ a~ F = ~~ 7 ~ _ > t =-a ' :,n'E. „une 6, 1984 . _I ~'-" TD: City ~ouncil and City ,Manager ~ F.R G'•': Lloyd 3. Hubbs, City Eng'^ee- SU?CECT: ;,tta Channel Assessment Distr; ct G2-? June 6, 1954 is the date of th_= final formation hearing on Assessment District 32-2. As explained in my memo of April 30, 1934 (attached?, Staff has proposed a revision to the District eliminating those properties which have not submitted some type of 8e velopment proposal, On May 22, a worts hop was held with the property owners to exp Lain this option. Representatives of the I P.Sdr Group were present and several of the active developers. Only one ohj ection tp the proposal was raised by Phiio Bane, Mr Biane processed a parcel Mao recently to divide his 20 acres far sale, The remaining 6 acre parcel ah ich is the site of his home he feels should be exempt from i assessment, The conditions of the parcel map required iec ;usian in the • District are consistent with the philosophy of the :eve lopment inclusion. All other input on the new proposal was positive. Based on the support of the revised District, it i5 Staff's recommendation that Assessment District 62-2 be ah an doped and a District within the revised hounder ies be iniCitated with a tentative construction schedule for early j Spring of 1945. jl Development of the new District will require .modification to the plans and bid documents, revisions to the Environmental Impact Report and additional Assessment Engineering Services to establish the new district. If Council wishes to proceed with the revised district, you should approve the attached contract revis ;ens as listed below: Associated Engineers - Design - $29,000,00 Don King and Associates - E.I.R. - - $ 5,625.00 Don Owen & Associates - Assessment Engineer - $14,000.00 The bvo key paints 20 consider about the proposed District revision are the fact Lhat the City cantribut ion to the District may exceed $500,000 and the immediate etf ect of the revised project will he increased growth with no mitigation of increased runoff to Hermosa Avenue. Even considering these two factors, staff feels that the rev i5ed project is the most expeditious - alternt at ive and should be developed. % CITY COU`lC IL STAFF / Alta Lama Channel June 6, 1984 ~ Page 2 REPORT }} Assessmc~~. District 32-2 4S RECPYMENDATION It is SL aff~s recommendation that Council adapt the attached resolution abandoning Assessment District 32-2 and rejecting all construction bids. Adopt a resolution reinitiating proceedings on Assessment District 84-2 and approve consultant contract changes to proceed ~dith formation of a revised assessment district. Contract changes are specified in the attached contract documents in the amounts as spec ifi=d above. Respectfully submi'ted, °~ LB aa' Attachments • j / %~ y;~ - CITY OF RASCHO CCCA~IO;vGA iVIE1bI0ftANDUiVI DAT°: April 30, 1984 T0: City Cour,c it and City Manager PAO:d: Lloyd B. Y.ubbs, City Engineer SUBJ^cCT: ALTA LCNA CBANNEL ASSESSMENT DISTAZCT °.'-2 ~ ~~~~.iin1~. ~.` ~ a r~\ ~. ~! c~ ~_~ s - ,.>-- -1 The purposa of this meme is to sumvarise the restruc ling of the Alta Loma Channel Assessment DisUr ict. T.'nis restructured district '.+ili be presented to property owners on May 22, 1984 at 7:00 cm in the ne^orum, It there appears to be no significant opposition, the current district would be abandoned on June 6 and Lhe process of formation of the subsequent district begun. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82-2 DESCRIPTION Exhibit A shows the boundary antl key elements of District 82-2 which is currently in process. These Fey pro }ect elements and cost estimates are delineated below: Project Element Estimate Cost 1. Storm Orain 3B and 3B Basin $ 414,000 (Serves exclusively Tract 10089} 2. Alta Loma Basin 3 Construction 141,000 ?, Alta Loma Basin at Hillside 111,000 4. Channel Crossing at Hillside 75,000 5, Channel Crossing at Wilson 125,000 6. Alta Loma Channel and Spillway from Basin 3 to Basin No.2 1,426,000 7. Excavation of Alta Loma Basin No. 2 190,000 9. Construction of Equalizer Sox and Outlet 9orks 150,000 g, Storm Ocain 3E (Wilson 0.vrnue) 37,000 10. Hillside Road and Storm Drain 3D tE1,000 11. Engineering (Design S Construetion} 550,000 TOTA6 33,?80,000 i / ~[ Alta Loma Channel Asses .e..(~ District 92-2 ~ April 30, 1904 ?age 2 / / • Under the existing proposal, the construction costs plus financing total $4,650,000 to be assessed to 602.68 acres resulting in a $7,715 per acre assessment. REV i3I09 P90POEAL CECCR??TION IC is proposed that the scone of improveaent and Dis tricL boundari=_s he reduced to allow currently approved developments to continue at approximately Lhe assessment level originally noticed (see Exhibit B). In order W accomplish Lhis will require the City to contribute funds to the DisticL and enter into a re imbursexent agreement with the County Tor engineering costs. The revised boundary is shown on Ezh ib it 9 and the new project elements and deletions are shown below: Project Element Estimate Cost 1. Storm Drain 3B and 30 Basins Deleted 2. Alta Loma Basin 3 Construction $ 141,000 3. Alta Loma Basin 3 Excavation Deleted 4. Channel Crossing at Hillside (75,000) . 5. Channel Crossin3 at Wilson (City Contr ib~a ion) (125,000) 6. Alta Loma Channel and Sp illxay Cram Basin 3 to 9asin No. 2 1,426,000 7. Excavation of Alta Loma Basin No. 2 Deleted 8. Construction of Equalizer Boz and Outlet Work 150,000 9. Storm Drain 3E (Wilson Avenue) 37,000 10. H111s!de Road and Storm Drain 3D Deleted 11. Engineering (City Contribution County Loan) (550.000) Cost to District 1,554,000 CSLy Contribution 500,000 County Loan 250,000 TOTAL $2,304,000 The total cost to bond Cor the project including construction contingency, bond discount and reserve would be approximately $2,000,000. Total acreage within the reduced boundary would be approximately 260 acres. The resulting assessments would be approximately $7,700 per acre. • v Alta Loma Channel Asse9. .~~~ District 92-2 April 30, t984 :age • ZL show id be noted :hat Tentative Tract 10099 has been deleted Cro:c 'h~+ proposed District 9oundsry. This tract would be held responsible Car Storm Drain 39 and 3B Basin and excavation of Alta Loma Basin No. 3 at ti~c~~ of development (total cost $555;000). Staff feels that a City contribution to the project in the form of ":'~+i n:+,;o and Systems .Fees for road crossings is ,justified based on ovens Ll CitY benefits of the project. Approximately $250,000 of City contribution has already been expended in engineering and associated costs. These Cun,IS h.rve been drawn from the Drainage Fee Fund. It is proposed that Lhe County loan the City $250,000 in the Corm o! Engineering and Inspection Services. The costs would be repaid with Fu cure Drainage Fees. '!'his general concept has been supported Dy the County and it would be proposed that a standard reimbursement agreement far drain.+Sn 6c utilized. This will be worked out as the project continues. Those properties not included in the District would be expected to p~iY tl+~' current prevailing drainage fee and complete excavation of the Altn Loma Basins prior to issuance of building permits. IC should be pointed out that development in process under Lhe restruc CUr~d program will be relieved of potential flood hazard but no mitigation of • increased flows to Hermosa/Turner will be of feo cod '_ ~metliately. Stn tC will continue to vigorously pursue the bas In expansion :^, the future as t'unds become available. PAOCEDUR ES If the proposed restructuring meets with Council and Community approval, the current District would be abandoned and a new District developed. D~+vr.lopment of the new District will require revision of the Plans and Specificatlona, Environmental Docuaents, a new Engineer's Aeport and new advertisement and postings. The estiaa ted cost of this work is $40,000 to $45,000. Aof inu.l figures are currently being obtained frog consultants Cor the pro j~~ct. If you have any questions, please call. Respectfully submitted, L9H:jaa ce: Mackensie Brown, Bond Counsel lack Lam, CDD Director Robert Dougherty, City Attorney Chuck Laird, S.B. County Dan Ring, EIfl Consultant Larry Ro lapp, Financ inL Consultant Don Owen, Assessment Engineer .... ...:~.••• ~ BASIN i.. :~'.I ~ I •~• LEGEND --_~• ~ 4 E lOC B No ••• ••••••• DISTr"~ ~' ~ ' as ••`: BOUNDARY -~--yi ~„ ~, p STJRM :••2AS:N3 I ~ P EXISTING `~ ii ~ E CRAW EXCA~A?IGN (.~ ~ DEVELOPME • ~•-•• ~•••• • ~' II NOT ASSESSED • -__- __--:.. sx ~ ~ :e 'I b (BASINa IT- -_.I _~~• ,~ ~ - ~ccws~RUC •~-i X11-._";--~-: t~i' _., ' ~ i •~ _ - ~~ H1LL=1oE'a RM ~^ •~ I, u wL'.floE cH„NNEL - « ~ ~ ~L:~~ "~~' ~ RAIN 3D. ~ 1 -_.- ~~~~~~_ ~ i ~ I '.r --1 ... CRO55'~NG-- ~__~~'_~L1~I L~ I~ f ~ Ib i ~--- ---~ L_~ v I~ I i 1, ~~ '~ ~ ~V ILSCY [HAN •fNN ........r.~~,1~W1 I ~ ! ' ! 1~ ~CRGSGING .1 ~--'- ~~--`~-~-~ •' EXIST. ASSESSMEP a • ~ r _ •~~ U ~ ~V - ~~ ~i-i~ ~ ~ EXCATf N~~~"`YYY ~'ECUALI'c apY ~I`i --_ 1' - ~~ii "~~ •\ ~` ~"~_j. ~- HAVE9 CHANNEL _...~ •,\~. -~,~ .~~ ~ OuTLcT NORTH ~r 1-- i • ~~ ~. ~~ ., _ _ u~ ~y.~ __ _ _ _ Y'~~ ~~ w Ir ,yJ ~ ........I _~_..• ~. r. . ~ -~. _~~. ~~~ I~ ~ ~~ ~ I~ -h I -- ; -.---:~ I~_ I _ i Tom'. ;r=- r~---,.~, °I ~, ~~-:~f~~'~ ALTA LONE CHANtIEL --~-":~_~- /,y RANCHO CUCA"O9GA ~, ~;,,,,..., „I„ ~ ~; EXHIBIT ..A.. iRi Ol•l~~,t . ~""~ ~e. s ~~~ ~.,- `,~ i ~N[~~ N r, ~ NN '~ _, ,y ~ L Y~ 7 f L' _ ~-~~•. ~ - ~~ IQ l J y li:-!.. ~L~-~-~~~ '~" 1 - ti„_---•--- i i~- I I ~~~ -III^ca_..7~ Q!Q n ~~ LEGEND •~~~• PROPOSED DISTRICT fiOUNCARV a AREAS TO BE ASSESSED ~~_~_ _ -~ I ~~=,~I ~f i PROPOSED j "ASSESSMENTi I ~~~ H4V EN CMFNNEL cuTL°T NORTH ~~_.._~0'~- ~._~. ~L: ... ._~.'. -!I _..~. ,_ ~µ z-: ~y L 4~.'` ~r.cs~', . t-.f -.i.~~ r-, ALTA LCHA CHAiJJJEL ?;., wd~~ '+ ~ RA~JCNO CL'CA"O~4GA -`n.___.. ,~ ~~~=~L"~i n li ~' ~~ ~, EXHIBIT B i~i~n:virF.' d ~- ORDER OP PROC EOURE CITY OF RAN LHO [UCANONGA ASSESSMENT OI STR ICT N0. 96-2 (AIiA LOMq CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) GATE 06 MEETING: FEBRUARY 6, 1985 STAFF: Present eeec urea Petitions aM Certificate o1 Suffittency. STAFF; General presentation as to bounoari es pt Asses salm Distr ic[ eM eef ent o/ works o/ improvement. CITY COUNCIL; Aooot RESOLVTION MAKING FINDINGS ON PETITION: Formal as ion accepts nq the Petition. CITY COUNCIL: AEOpI RESOLUTION DESIGNATING PERSONS i0 PE RfORM DIRIES: Formal dDDOi ntl,pM of $ucer in [e0lln[ 01 SCf ee [S dnd newf Ddpef fOr lepol publica[io n. C17Y (OUHC II: Adopt RESOLUTION ADDPi ING PROPOSED ~'JN DARY MAP; Formal action approv;Op bounea ri es Of pr ppoSeO ASSes s^4 nt Dis[rit t. CITY [pDNL II: Adopt RESOLUTION 7F INTENTION: Juri said ionel Aes of ucion "7913 A<[" prpceea'~nas, beclarinp intent [o order improve and issue bonds. STAFF: PreSe nt arson o1 Enc. neef's "Reno ri" Dursuant [D fh! provisions of "MUn icfDat Imp~DVeme n[ Ac[ pf 19ll", cpns refs ny of Ne f011owinp: I. Plant; 2. Spec ifs. a[fons: 7. Cost Estimate; a, Assessment Roll; 5. Assessment Diagram; CITY COUNCIL: Apppt RESOLUTION PASSING ON REPORT 0.ND SETTIND PUBLIC NFARI NG: Sets pub HC he ar inq on "1913 Act" Enp sneer's "Report". CRY COVNCIL: 0.JOOt RESOLUTION REfERENC ING WGE SCALE ANO CALLING f0A BIOS (CONS TAVCifON): Formal action au tha ri xin9 bi dJi nq on Me works of improvement. CITY [pUNL R: AGOOt RESOLUTION AVTxOpIZt NG SALE CF ~H05: This Resolution a uthori 2l5 the 5a le pf bonds to finance the impr DVements. PROPOSED SCNEOULE: f FOR UAAY 6, 1985: AOOPi ,pRl$D I[Yi DNAL PESOLIR IONS ANp AUTMOAi2E AI DD ING ON NOAKS OF IMPA OVEMEN7 R10 SALE OF BO NOS MAACH ], IoBA: GATE fOR AECEIPi OF CONSTRUCTION BIOS MARCH Z0, 19fl 5: PUBLIC HEARING i0 CO NSIDEA [ONf IRM47ION OF ASSES D IS TR ICS PNO OR DEA ING IMPROVEMENTS ;'i; IL ~~ • RESOLUTION N0. - ~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq, CALIFORNIA, MAKING FINDINGS ON PETITION WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has been presented by certain property owners an executed Petition reques tinq the construction of certain public improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, said improvements to be constructed pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 8a_2 (ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"): and, WHEREAS, it has been reported that said Petition contains the signatures of more than sixty percent (60X) of the property owners of the assessable area of the property to De sub,iect to assessment for the proposed works of improvement. Said Petition meets the requirements of Section 2804 of Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, [T IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Tnat it is hereby found that said Petition has been signed by owners own inq land constituting more than sixty percent (60X) of all assessable land within the boundaries of the proposed As5e55me nt District. SECTION 3. That said Petition shall be filed with the transcript of these proceed- ings and shall remain open to public inspection. S ECT(ON 4, That said Petition meets the requirements of Section 2804 of Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and further proceedings and limitations under the provisions of the "Special Assess- ment Investiqat ion, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931" shall not be applicable to these proceedings. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1985, ATTEST: CITY OF RANCHO CUCRMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA fTY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~!~ 7 • RESOLUTION N0. ~~ ~- ~ ~% RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING PERSONS 70 PERFORM VARIOUS DUTIES FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, is considering the formation of a special assessment disrr ict, pursuant to the terms anA provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and H ighways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain public works of improvement, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, 5a id Special assessment district to be known and des iqn ated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. A4-2 (ALTA LOM4 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and, WHEREAS, at this time, the City is desirous of making the required appointments and designating persons to perform certain duties, in order to allow the proceedings to go forward to completion in accordance with the provisions of law. NOW, THEREFORE, IT lS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. • SECTION 2. That LLOYD ft. HUBBS is hereby appointed to perform all of [he duties and functions of the Superintendent of Streets as said du[i es are specified and designated in the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", be inq Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the above referenced As se ss men[ District. SECTION 3. That the place for recordation of the assessment roll and di agram shall be in the Office of the Superintendent of Streets, and said assessment roll and diagram, upon recordation, shall be kept as a permanent record. SECTION 4. ih at the GAILY REPORT is hereby designated as the newspaper for all publications as required Dy law and as necessary for completion of this Assessment District. SECTION 5. That DON OWEN b ASSOCIATES is hereby appointed [he Assessment Engineer for said pr oce ed Togs, and said Asses sr<n~ Enq ineer shall perform all of the duties and responsibilities as set forth by law as they relate to said Assessment District, SECTION 6. That ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS is hereby appointed as Design Engineer for these proceedings, and Said Design Enq ineer shall perform all of the duties and responsibilities as set forth by law as they relate to said Assessment District. r1 ~I ~ L~ SECTION 7. That FIELOMAN, ROLAPP 6 ASSOCIATES is hereby appointed as FI NANC~ CONSULTANT, and authorized to obtain a proposal or bid for Che sale bonds to be issued in order to finance said proceedings, said bonds to be issued pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. That F, MACKENZIE BROHN, Attorney at Law, is hereby appointed to act as Bond Counsel for the purposes of preparing proceedings and issuing an approving opinion attesting to the validity of the proceedings and the enforceability of the bonds. SECTION 9. That this City Council hereby establishes a special IMPROVEMENT FUND designated by the name and number of the Assessment District, and into said fund shall be placed all proceeds from the sale of bonds and cash collections. in order to expedite the improvements or at quisition under these proceedings and as authorized by law, funds from any available source may be transferred into Said special fund. Any funds transferred are a loan to the fund and shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the sale of bonds, all as required and authorized by law, and specifically Section 10210 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1985. C~ ATTEST; Y L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA • r ~ r, /~ r • RESOLUTION N0. ^ ^~ - ~=~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WNEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has been presented and has received a map showing and de sc ribino the boundaries of the area proposed to to assessed in an assessment district under the provisions and authority of the "Municipal Improvement Ac[ df 1913", Se ing Oivis ion 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California: said assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 (AL TA COMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"). NOW, THEREFORE, IT 15 HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. • SECTION 2. That a map Of the Asses srmnt Oistr ict sho winq the hounds ri es of the pro- posed Assessment Di5[r ict and lands antl property to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of Che proposed improvements designated as "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT OIS TR ILT N0. 84-2 (ALTR COMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS)" is hereby Submitted, and the same is hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 3. That the original maD of said proppse0 boundaries of the proposed Assess- ment District and one copy thereof is to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. S EC iI ON 4. A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one copy of the map of the Assessment District, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fiz inp the time and place of hearing on the formation or exCe nt of said Assessment District, a copy of said map shall be filed wiCh the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner anA form provided for Sn Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. '~~ n, ~~ • RESOLUTION N0, "'~ - ~/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTEN- TION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS, TOGETHER W[TH APPURTENANCES,IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT qCT OF 1913"; DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY BENEFIT; DESCRIBING THE DIST- RICT TO DE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS RND EXPENSES THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The public interest and convenience require, and it is the intention of this body, pursuant to the provisions of Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913"), to order the construction of certain public improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, in a special assessment district known and designated a5 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 • (ALTA COMA CHANNEL 1MPR0 VEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District") OESCR IPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS R. The proposed works of imorovemen[ are qe ne ral ly described as the wr- struction and installation of certain sm rm drainage channel improve- ments, Inc ludinq a debris dam and spillway improvements, box culverts and road crossing improvements, together with appurtenances and appur- tenant work, to serve and benefit properties within the boundaries of Che Assessment District. 8. Said streets, rights-of-way and easements shall be shown upon the plans herein referred to and to be filed with these proceedings. C. All of said work and improvements are to be constructed a[ the places and in the particular locations, of the forms, sizes, dimensions am materials, and at the lines, grades and elevations as shown and deli- neated upon [he plans, profiles and specifkatio ns to 6e made there- for, as hereinafter provided, D. The description of the improvements and the termini of the work con- tained in this Resolution are pe neral in nature. All items of work do not necessarily extend for the full length of the description thereof. The plans and profiles of the work as contained in the Engineer's "Report" shall be controlling as to the correct and de [ailed descrip- tion thereof, /1 /~ Whenever any public way is herein referred to as running between public ways, or from or to any public way, the intersections of t public ways referred to are included to the extent that work shall be shown on the plans to be done therein. Notice is hereby given of the fact that in many cases said work and improvement will bring the finished work to a grade different from that formerly ex ist inq, and that to said extent, sa itl grades are hereby changed and said work will be done to said ch anged qr ades. DESCRIP710N OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SECTION 2. That said improvements and work are of direct benefit to the properties and land within the Assessment District, and this City Council hereby makes tl.e ex oenses of said work and improvement chargeable upon a district, which said Assessment District is hereby declared to be the Assessment District benefited by said work and improvements and to be assessed to pay the ces is and ez penses thereof, including incidental expenses and costs and which is described as follows: All that certain territory in the District included within the exterior boundary lines shown on the plat exhibiting the property affected or benefited by or to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of said work and improvements Sn the Assessment District, said map titled and indenti- fied as "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF • ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. Ba-2 (ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS)" and which said map was heretofore approved and which said map or tli agram is on file with the Cranscrioc of these proceedings, EXCEPTING from the area shown within and delineated upon said mao or plat here inabove referred to, the area of all public screets, public avenues, Dublic lanes, Dublic roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, and all easements and ri ghts-of-way therein containeA Gel onp inq to the public. For all particulars as to the boundaries of the Assessment District, reference is hereby made Co said boundary mao heretofore previously approved, and for a complete description of said Assessment District, the said plat and proposed boundary map on file shall govern. R EPOPT OF ENGINEER SECTION 3. That this proposed improvement is hereby referreA to the appointed SUPER- INTENDENT OF STREETS, who is hereby directed to make and file the report in writing containing the following; A. Plans and specifications of the pr oposeA improvements: An estimate of the cost of [he proposed works of improvement, includ- ing the cost of the incidental expenses in connection therewith; • ~~ C. R diagram showing the Assessment District above referred to, which shall also show the boundaries and dimensions of the respective Subdi- visions of land within said Assessment District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention, each of which subdivisions shall be given a separate number upon said Diagram: D. A proposed assessment of the total amount of the assessable costs and expenses of the pr oposetl improvement upon the several divisions of land in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such subdivi- sions, respectively, from said improvement. Said assessment shall refer to such subdivisions upon said diagram by the respective numbers thereof: E. The description of the works of improvement to be constructed under these proceedings, and acquisition, where necessary. When any portion or percentage of the cos[ and expenses df the improvements is to be paid from sources other than assessments, the amount of such portion or percentage shall first be deducted from the total estimated costs and expenses of said work and improvements, and said a5 sessment shall include only the remainder of the estimated costs and expenses. Said assessment shall refer to said subdivisions by their respective numbers as assigned pursuant to Subsection D. of this Section, BONDS • SECTION 4. Notice is hereby given that serial bonds co represent Che unpaid assess- ments, and bear interest at the rate of not [o exceed the current legal maximum rate of 12x per annum, will be issued hereunder in the manner pr cv ided in the "Improvement Band Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets antl Highway. Code of the State of California, the last installment of which bonds shall mature a maximum of and not to exceed FOURTEEN (la) YEARS from the second day of July next succeeding ten (10) months from their dace. The pr ovisiens of Part 11.1 of said Act, pr ov idinq an alterna- tive procedure for the advance payment of as sessment5 and the calling of bonds shall apply. The principal amount of the bonds maturing each year shall be other than an amount equal to an even annual proportion of the aggregate principal of the Donds, and the amount of principal maturing Sn each year, plus the amount of interest payable in that year, will 6e generally an apgreq ate amount that is equal each year, except far the first year's adjustment. Pursuant to the Drovisions of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, specifically Section 10603, the Treasurer is hereby designated as the officer to collect and receive the assessments during the cash collection period. Said bonds further shall be serviced by the designated Paying Agent. "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913" SECTION 5. That except as herein otherwfse provided for the issuance of Donds, all of said improvements shall be made and ordered pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal lmprovement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. ~ ^? 1 ' .~ SURPLUS FUNDS SECTION 6. That if any excess shall be realized from the assessment, it shall be used, in such amounts as the City Council may determine, in accordance with the provisions of law for one or more of the followi nq purposes: A. Transfer to the general fund: provided that the amount of any such transfer shall not exceed the lesser of One Thousand Dollars (E1 ,000.00) or five percent (5X) of the total from the Improvement Fund; B, As a credit upon the assessment and any supplemental assessment: or C. For the maintenance Of the improvement. SD EC IAL FUND SECTION 7. The Lity Council hereby establishes a special improvement fund identi- fied and designated by the name of Lois Assessment District, aM into said Fund monies may be transferred at any time to expedite the making of Che improvements herein authorized, and any such advancement of funds is a loan and shall be repaid gut of the proceeds of the sale of bontls as authorized by law. PRIVATE CONTRACT • SECTION 8. Notice is hereby given that the public interest will not be served by allowing the property owners to take the contract for the construction of the improvements, and Chat, as authorized by law, no nqt ice of award of contras[ shall be published. PROCEEDINGS INQUIRIES SECTION 9. For any and all information relating to these pr oceedings, ins ludinq information relating to protest procedure, your attention is tlirect ed to Lhe person designated below: LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. BO% 801 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 TELEPHONE: (714) 989-1651 PUBLIC PROPERTY SECTION 10. All public property in the use and performance of a public function shall be omitted from assessment in these Droceedings unless express provided and listed herein. X71 • PETITION SECTION 11. That a petition signed by property owners representing more than GOX in area of the property subject to assessment for said improvement has been signed and filed with the City Council, and said written petition expressly contains a waiver of any of the proceedings and limitations as set forth under Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931". APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 19A5. CITY OF RRNCNO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTEST: Y L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA • l.J ~~~ • RESOLUTION N0. ~ =- c~a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRSSING ON THE "REPORT" OF THE ENGINEER, GIVING PRELIMINARY AP PROVRL, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, CALIFORNIA, has instituted proceedings far the construction of certain public works of improvement and appurte- nances under provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", be inq Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 (ALTA COMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and, NHER EAS, there has been prepared and filed with the City Council a "Report" provided for in Sections 10203 and 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and ChiS "Report" has been presented for consideration; and, WHEREAS, a Resolution of Intention for this improvement was previously adopted by the City Council: and the "Report" as now presented shall stand as the "Report" for the • purpose of subsequent proceedings hereunder. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RE SOL VEO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the ah ove recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. chat the "Report" of the Engineer referred to here in ab ove is considered adapted, passed upon, and preliminarily approved, as follows: A. That the plans and specifications for the proposed improvements to be made, contained in said "Rea ort" be, and they are hereby prelimi- narily approved and adopted: 8. That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of said acquisition, where necessary, and improvements, and of the incidental ezDenses in connection therewith, contained in said "Report", 6e, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and adopted; C. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said Resolution of Intention, and also Che boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions of land within said Assessment District, as the same ez isteA at the time of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, each of which subdivisions have been given a separate number upon saitl di agram, as contained in said "Report", he, and it is hereby preliminarily approved and adopted: D. That the proposed as se55ment upon the several subdivisions of land in said Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated benefits r, -. -/ / ~' to be received by such subdivisions, respectively, from said acquis t ion and improvements, and of the incidental expenses thereof, a contained in said "Report", De, and they are hereby preliminarily approved and adopted; E. That the maps and descriptions of the lands and easements to be acquired, as contained in said "Report" be, and the same are hereby preliminarily approved; F. That said "Report" shall stand as the Engineer's "Report" for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings had Dursuant to said Resolution of Intention. SECTION 3. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 1985, AT THE HOUR OF 1:30 O'CLOCK P,M „ IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, LOCATED AT LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER FORUM, 9161 BASE LINE ROAD, RANCHO LUCAMONGA, CA, ANY AND ALL PERSONS HAVING ANY OR JECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED WORK, OR ASSESSMENT, OR EXTENT OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, OR TO THE PROPOSED GRADES, MAY APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID WORK SHOULD NOT BE DONE OR CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION AND THE "REPORT" OF THE ENGINEER. PROTESTS MUST BE IN WRITING PND MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY CLERK AT OR BEFORE THE TIME SET FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of said Publi~ Hearing by causinq to be conspicuously posted~on all open streets within the Rssessment District, not more than 300 feet apart on each street so posted, but not less than 3 in all, notice of the passage of the Resolu- tion of Intention and of this Resolution, all in accordance with the provisions of said Division 12. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice Of said Public Hearing anA of the passage of the Resolution of Intention and this Reso- lution by causinq such notice Co be published in accordance with Section 6066 of the Government Code, in the newspaper previously designated as the newspaper for all publications as required by law and as necessary for completion of this Assessment District. SECTION 6. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to mail notice of said Public Hearing and the adoption of the Resolution of Intention and of Che filing of the "Report" to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed, whose names and ad dresses dppe ar on the last eq ud112ed a55e55- ment roll for City taxes prior thereto, or as known to said City Clerk, and to all other persons as prescribed in accordance with the provisions of said Division 12. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk is hereby further directed to file a coDY of th~ proposed boundary map in the Office of Che County Recorder within fifteen X77 • (15) days of the adoption of the proposed boundary map; said boundary ma0 to tp in the manner and form as set forth in Oivis ion 4.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1985. YR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA \J 1 / `7 • RESOLUTION N0. "~ -~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REFERENCING PREVAILING WAGE SCALE AND DIRECTING CALL FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has heretofore instituted proceed ings under the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the c ons crud ion of certain public works of improvement in a sceci al assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 (AL TA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"): and, WHEREAS, at this time there have been submitted for final review the plans and scecifi- cations for the works of improvement for the Assessment District: and, WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to also call for sealed proposals or bids for the doing of Said work and improvements in said Assessment District: and, WHEREAS, it is necessary to determine the prevailing rate of wages for the various • classifications of workmen required in the performance of said work. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above reci*als are all true and correct. SECTICN 2. That the plans antl soecif icatio ns for the works of improvement in the Assessment District are hereby ao proved and authorized for bidding. SECTION 3. That it is hereby determined and ascertained that the general prevailing rate of per diem wages in the locality in wfi ich said work described is to be performed in the matter of the construction of certain public works of improvement, together with appurtenances, in the Assessment Oistr ict, under the provisions of the "Municipal [mproveme nt Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the Stale of California, for each craft or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute the contract, and also the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and overtime work of each craft or type of workman or mechanic, is in accordance with the schedule obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, pursuant to [he provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of Califor- nia, and reference is hereby made to copies thereof on file with the transcript of these proceedings, which said copies are available Co any interested party upon reouest. Further, a copy shall be posted at each ,job site during the course of construction. SECTION 4. That the proposals or bids shall be opened and examined dt a public meeting so called: and said results of the biddi na shall be reported a[ the next regular meet inq of this City Council after the opening of the bids. SECTION 5. That the terms and conditions for bi ddinq on the works of improvement this Assessment District are as set forth in fu 11 in the Bid Documents the specifications as previously approved. Reference is hereby made to said Bid Documents heretofore approved and identified as follows: NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. fla-2 (ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) For all particulars as to bitldinq, the Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals above referenced and all incorporated documents and laws, including but not limited to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", shall control. SECTION 6. That it is hereby determined that in the event the contractor, contract- inq owners included, does not complete the work within the time limit specified in the contract or within the time limit as shall be autho- rized, the cgntr actor or contracting owners, as the case may 6e, shall pay as liquidated damages the amount or amounts a5 set forth in the specifications for the project, said amounts herein referenced arM so incorporated. That it is impractical to determine the actual damage which will be sustained by reason of such delay, but that the stated sum is a reason ah le amount for said liquidated damages and is not being imposed as a penalty. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1985. • MAYOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTEST: Y L RK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA • '. ~~. -, v,, • RESOLUTION N0. ~ ^< RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SPECIAL ASSESS- MENT BONDS 70 FINANCE IMPROVEMENTS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT O15TRI CT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has initiated proceedings pursuant to the terms and conditions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain puhlic works of improvement, together with appurte- nances and acquisition, where necessary, in a special assessment district; said special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 64-2 (ALTA COMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"): and, WHEREAS, it has Deen further determined that serial bonds shall be issued to finance the costs and expenses of said improvements and proceedings, and said bonds shall be issued pursuant to [he terms and provisions of the "lmpr ovement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California: and, • WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous of authorizing the sale of bonds to finance the works of improvement as proposed for this Assessment District. NOW, THEREFORE, IT !S HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the ah ove recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Thac the FINANCIAL CONSULTANT is hereby authorized to soli=ic a proDOSaI or proposals for the sale of bones for the Assessment District. The interest rate on said bonds shall not exceed the current legal maximum rate of twelve percent (12M) Der annum. Said bonds shall be issued pursuant to the terms and conditions as set forth in the Resolution of Intention as previously adopted for these proceed ings, SECTION 3. That this Resolution is adopted Dursuant to the provisions of Section 10602 of the Streets ane Highways Code of the State of California, and it is further directed that all recommendations relating to the sale of bonds be presented to this body no later than the time set for the Public Hearing on the "Report" and related matters for this Assessment District. S Ef,TION 4. That there will 6e pr ovideA, at no ex Dense to the bidder, the aDpr ov ing legal opinion of F. MALKENZIE BROWN, Attorney at Law, attesting to the validity of the proceedings and the enforceability of the bonds. SECTION 5. Th aY pursuant to the provisions of Section 10600.5, it is hereby deter- mined that the bonds shall bear interest from their date, and the date of the bonds shall 6e MAY 2, 1985, or the 31st day after recordation of the assessment roii and diagram, whichever is later, ;fir s SECTION 6. That the information far Bidders Document, incJUdinq the Notice of S/~ APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1985. for these proceedings (hereinafter referred to as the BOND B1 DDI DOCUMENTS), as prepared and presented by the Financial Consultant, are hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 7. The Financial Consultant is hereby directed to mail copies of the BOND BIDDING DOCUMENTS to all persons determined to be prospective purchasers and inte rs ted in bidding on the bonds to be issued far these proceedings, and is hereby authorized to make minor modifications and amendments to the BOND BIDDING DOCUMENTS in order to provide the best available information up to the date and time for the sale. SECTION 8. That in the event of any delinquency in the payment of any installment of an assessment, it is hereby covenanted with the holder of the bonds that this City Council will cause [o be commenced and thereafter di ligentiy or osecuted, judicial foreclosure proceedings upon all delinquent unpaid assessments upon the specific terms, times and conditions as set forth in the bidding documents relating to the sale of bonds. It is further hereby ordered that an investigation be initiated as soon as possible each year to determine all tax delinquencies on all properties within the boundaries of the above referenced Assessment Disirct. ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CAL [FORNIA • .~ ~,~.~ • F. MAC KQN CIE BROWN ..n4aev a Drvc,~ p 0.ANCH0 SANTA FE gALIF00.NIA 92W1 January 28, 19A5 William Holley Director of Community Services City of Ranchp Cucamonga P. 0. Ron ft07 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 41730 RE: PARK ANO RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK) Dear Bill: Enclosed herein please find the following: Snu D~ 6'.''. ,56~59fl• ~.D •6~ pos nvG 4C5 z.n sDa ~. zz 1. RESOLUTION ADOPTING PLAT: The plat shall be prepared by Wil ldan Associates and be maee available prior to the adoption of [his Resolution. • 2. RESOLUTION INITIATING PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERING ENGINEER'S "REPORT": This will be the orma action o the ity ounce ortlen ng the preparation of the authorized Engineer's "Report". Prior co the adoption of the above Resolutions, the City Clerk should have received and have pn file a Plat map, to 6e prepared 6y Wil ldan R Associates, qe ne ral ly showing the area and property pr noosed to be assessed in the referenceA Assessment Distr i~a . Please note that Section 2 in the Resolution Ordering the Engineer's "R epprt" refers Co an Exhibit "A" for a particular description of the works of improvement. I have at this time included a qe neral description as provided by the City: however, I would appreciate a careful review of this description to determine whether or not any modifications or amendments should be made. The proposed schedule for the pr o,j ect is still as follows: DATE ACTIVITY F ERR VARY 6, 1985: -- Approval of plat -- Formal order for preparation of Engineer's "Report con- sisting of the following: A. Pions B. Specifications C. Cost estimate D. Assessment diagram E, Assessment roll ~~`~ ~ ~ F. MACKENZIE B0.0WN William Hol ley~~ Director of Community Services City of Rancho Cucamonga January p8, 1985 Page Two • DATE ACTIVITY MARCH 20, 1985: -- Preliminary order approving "Report" -- Adopt Resolution of Intention and set public hearing -- Notice to be given by publication and mailing MAY 14, 1985 -- Hold Public Hearing, and City Council consider the following: A. Confirm assessments B. Order improvements C. Sell bonds Upon atloption of the enclosed Resolutions, I would appreciate rece iv inq conforme~ copies so that my file can bP kept current. If there are any Questions concerning this transmittal, please don't hesitate to cgncact me. -Vye~ry truly yours, l rl QC,. F. MACKENZIE BROHN FMB:bd enc 1. cc: Lauren Wasserman (letter only) u t~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~~-~i RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PLAT SHONI NG THE AREA AND PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has been presented and received a plat showing and des cribinq the area and property proposed to be assessed in an assessment district under the provisions and authority of the "L andscapino and Liqhtinq Act of 1972", be inq Division 15, Part 2 pf the Streets and Highways Code of the Slate of California, in what is known and desfgn aced as PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, That the above recitals are all Cr ue and correct. SECTION 2. That a plat showinq the areas and property proposed to he assessed in said Assessment District, as herewith submitted, is hereby approved and • adopted. SECTION 3. That the original plat showinq [he proposed areas and property to be assessed for the District shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk and remain open for public inspection. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1985. MAYOR CITY OF RANCHO CUC MIONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTEST: L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA r ~ J ~13x yr n/uv~nv ~u~nmviv.acx ~v~mp MEMORANDUM ~?`~~~",. 2i~,> __ 9 s 19~i DATE: February 6, 1985 TC: City Council FROM: City Clerk SUBJECT: Added Consent Calendar Ttem The following =tem needs to De added to the Consent Calendar in order to meet State deadlines for adopting the Uniform Mechanical Code. Set date of March 6, 19H6 for public hearing for consideration of adoption of the 19H7 edition of Lhe Uniform Mechanical Code. RESOLUTION N0. ?' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITiA7I NG PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEER'S "REPORT" FOR CERTAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, at this time proposes to initiate proceedings for the format ion of a scecial assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", be inq Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in what is known and designated as PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (,HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and, WHEREAS, there has been submitted for approval a Dlat designated by the name of this Assessment District, generally showing the area and property to he assessed in said Assessment District: and, WHEREAS, this City Council is desirous to order the preparation of a "Reoort", as authorized by Section ?2585 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, That the above recitals are all true and correct. DESCRIPTION OF IMPRDVEMENTS SECTION 2. That the public interest and convenience requires, and this legislative body does propose at this time to initiate proceedings for the formation of a special Assessment District for the following improvements: A, The installation and construction of park and retreational improve- ments, including but not limited to land preparation, inc ludinq grading, landscaping and irrigation systems, together With appurte- nant work; B. The maintenance and/or servicing of the foregoing. For particulars as to these works of improvement, reference is made to • Exhibit "A" attached hereto, referenced and so incorporated. • DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SECTION 3. Thai said improvements will provide a special and direct benefit to the property and parcels of land within Lhe boundaries of the Assessment District, and for a general description of the area and boundaries of said proposed District, reference is made to a Plat previously approved b,y this legislative body and identified by the name of this Assessment District, which Plat is on file with the transcript of these proceedings and open for public inspection. REPORT OF ENGINEER SECTION 4. That this improvement is hereby referred to WILLDAN & ASSOCIRTES, the appointed Engineer of Work, who is hereby directed to make and file the "Report" generally containing the following: 1. Plans and specifications for the improvements; 2. An estimate of the costs of the improvements for the pro,iect and referenced fiscal year: 3. A diagram for the Rs sessment District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; a, An assessment of the estimate costs of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the Assessment District in proportion to the benefits received. • That upon completion of the preparation of said "Report", the original shall De filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this legislative body fpr its immedf ate review and consideration. FISCAL YEAR SECTION 5. That the above "Report" shall include all costs and expenses relating to the fiscal ,year commencing duly 1, 1985, and end inq dune 30, 1986. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1985. MAY R CITY OF RANCVIO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTEST: L K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK) E%HIBIT "A" The proposed works of improvement are generally described as follows: I. HERITAGE PgRK Improvements will provide two shared li qh ted softball/soccer facilities, an equestrian facility, pl aygrounds, picnic areas, hard court and ,fogging trails. Additionally, a portion of the Rancho Wash will be retained as a "wilderness" area. II. REO HILL COMMUNITY PARK Improvements will provide four dedicated and if ghtetl baseball/softball diamonds • and two dedicated and lighted soccer fields. These will provide year-around facilities far each sport not now available. Also included will be a lake with a peninsula concert bowl and sloping, grassed amphitheater type ie ati ng, indivi- dual and group picnic areas, ,fogging trails with ezerci 5e stations, playgrounds and passive areas. x x x • CITX OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA c~~,+~o~ STAFF REPORT ~ 9. ~~ xJ i ~^ ~ ~« ,z DgTE: February 6, 1985 iy;; - T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CARYN ANNEXATION/TAX REVENUE EXCHANGE As part of the annexation proceedings for the Caryn Planned Community site iocated north of Highland, east of Milliken, the City and County of San Bernardino are required to reach an agreement on the property tax distribution formula to be effective upon annexation. Under normal circumstances, the County uses a standard formula. Under this formula, upon annexation, the cities receive 50 percent of the tax revenue generated by similar properties located within the City limits. This approach allows the County to retain the other 50 percent, under the premise that development of the site will generate new costs for the County, such as social services, law and ,iustice costs, library costs, etc. However, because Rancho Cucamonga is a post-Propasit ion 13 city, the property tax revenues generated in the City and returned to the City are already quite low, approximately 4.94 percent. This would mean that by using the standard formula, the City would only receive approximately two and one-half percent of all revenues generated on the site upon annexation. Staff felt that in our case the standard SO percent formuia was not equitable to the City and consequently negotiated an agreement with the County of San Bernardino which would allow future property tax transfer at the same rate that is in effect elsewhere within Lhe City limits, i.e., 4.94 percent. This is the best ratio possible under the circumstances, To finalize this agreement, approval of the attached Resolution by the City Council is required. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached Resolution, setting the City's shar~e^'o1f property tax revenue generated at 4.94 percent be apP~~ved. °~ / RG:OK:,{r ~gS-~1S RESOLUTION N0. P-2-6-3-R A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TA% REVENUES TD BE E%CNANGEO BETWEEN AND AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIND AND 7HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESULTING FROM 7HE JURISDICTIONAL CHANGE DESCRIBED eY LAFC N0. 2317 (CARYN) SECTION 1. THE CITY COWYCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA hereby finds and determines that: A. Pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, prior to the issuance of a certificate of filing by the Local Agency formation Commission Executive Officer, the governing bodies of all ocai agencies whose service area or service responsibilities wilt be altered by a proposed jurisdictional change shall negotiate and determine by resolution the amount of Droperty tax revenues to be exchanged between and among such agencies. B. Extept as provided in Section 99.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, in Lhe event that a jurisdictional change would effect the service area or service responsibility of one or more special districts, Lhe Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino shall, on behalf of th district or districts, negotiate any exchange of property taz revenues. C. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino have determined the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged as a result of the following jurisdict TOnal change: LAFC N0. 2317 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SECTION 2. THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA hereby resolves and orders that: A. The negotiated exchange of property tax revenues between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino, attached hereto as Exhibit °A" and incorporated herein by reference, resulting from the above-described jurisdictional change wfll be based on the City's historical share of 4.94tL and is hereby approved and accepted. Resolution No. P-2-6-3-R Page 2 B. The annual tax increment generated in the area subject to the jurisdictional change and attributable to the local agencies whose service are or service responsibilities will be altered by the proposed jurisdictional change shall be allocated in future years pursuant to the provisions of Section 96 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. SECTION 3. THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA is herehy directed to certify to the passage of this Resolution and to cause a certified copy to be sent to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Bernardino. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on D. Mi a s, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City erk ALTA LOMA RIDIIJG CLUB fut~Lo>n~,cnm~ P.O.Boall6 Pc': vary 5, 14s5 Mayor Son Dfikels City of Rancho Cucamonga California Dear Mayor htikals, As the board of directors of the Alta Lo;ux R.aing Club, we would like to express our support for a feasibility study to be done Co establish an assessment district to fund the development of Heritage and Red (till Community Parks. We wish to encourage the city council Co bring this concept before a public hearing. Respectfully, 1 ~/~//~/~////,//~) C.-1 ~~~.~~C-~~' ~'~ 1.t,~ ~i1 ~~e~~• ~. EGG. Lhf/1~ ~' ~~1.,.~~~ ~~, ~C.~ri ~y;,~'l~l... n<<. ~ ~ / ~ . ~.<-lam, l~ 7 ~, ~~~~~ . ~~.~/z~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1.~,, >'n'~~ A.H. REITER DEVELOPMENT February 1, 1985 TO: Mayor and City Council SUBJEC^_': Haven Avenue Overlay District Honorable Mayor and members of the City Council: We appreciate this opportunity to provide the City Council with our comments regarding the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The Reiter Development Company has a significant interest in the future development along the Haven Avenue Overlay District. we either own or have interest to develop sixty acres within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, including forty-six acres located at the NEC of Haven Avenue and 9th Street. We share in the interest to assure high quality development along Haven Avenue. it is with this interest that we support the adoptior. of the Haven Overlay District. Throughout the review process of the Overlay District we have provided comments in regards to our interests and concerns. We have taken the liberty to review in detail the standards of the Overlay District for both the intent and specific languace. It is our interest to support the adoption of the intent and standards of the Overlay District, but in some instances we request clarification or suggested language changes. The attachment is a summary of our cormlents. They are shown in order as they appear within the draft text of the Overlay District. We hope that the City Council will consider our requests and our comments during their deliberation of this ordinance. Again, thank you for the opportunity to provide comment. Sincerely, A.H, REITER.~ L MENT CO. _/ ,/ ^,. ~gl~s/,~J/yH / i er, /fj/ encl. cc: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Rick Gomez, City Planner Otto Rrouti 1, Senior Planner Mailing Address: P.O. Boa 7250 Newport Beach, Cslilornw 9M5&7250 (7111 751154/ Pullman al Redhill l .; V. HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT Purpose The purpose of the Overlay District is to establish development standards which address the unique setting and character of the Haven Avenue corridor. The Haven Avenue Overlay District is located on both the east and west sides of Haven Avenue extending from Foothill Boulevard south to 4th Street, as shown in figure V-1. Applicability The Overlay District is to be applied in conjunction with the Specific Plan for Subareas 6 and 7 and provides more specific and/or restrictive development policies, design standards and land use regulations for both Subareas 6 and 7. Topics not specifically covered 6y the Haven Avenue Overlay District will continue to 6e a_overned by the regulations of the Specific Plan. Development adjacent to the Haven Avenue Overlay District shall consider compatibility and integration with the Overlay District through the Master Plan process. Setting Haven Avenue is located near the geographic center of the City and will be the most significant gateway into Rancho Cucamonga. Another important aspect i5 the distinctiveness of the Haven Avenue corridDr in relation to other major arterials designated as "Special Boulevards". Haven Avenue is the major travel route for the City and has the potential for high end office development with a unique combination of direct access to the airport and the Interstate ID freeway. This provides the City a rare opportunity to enhance its image by encouraging intensive, high quality office and professional development along the Haven Avenue corridor. Relation to General Plan The General Plan affirms that travel routes are predominate elements of the community's image and encourages the distinctiveness of individual districts and roadway corridors. In addition, the General Plan states that a consistent design theme is necessary to reinforce the image or perception of a route. The Specific Ptan states that the Haven Avenue corridor and the InduYrial Park category should be designed to project a "campus tike image for firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment with high prestige value". -1- A. Goal Statement wE HEARTEOLV SUPPORT TIE ODNCEPT TO ENCOURAGE LONG RANGE MASTER PLAN OF HAVEN AVENUE FOR HIGH WALT TY DEVELOPMENT. Goals are statements that define the conmunity's aspiration and intentions. The goal for the Haven Avenue corridor has evolved from sessions with the industrial and business eortenunit ies and with the City's elected and appointed officials. This goal represents the current conception of and future aspirations for the best interest of the City for the Haven Avenue corridor. Encourage long-range master planned development along the Haven Avenue corridor which enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high quality gateway into the City and by promoting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosphere in a campus like setting with high prestige identity. B. Land Use Types wE SVPPOITT TiE cowcePT of THE PRI• The intent of the following Dolicies is to MARY FUNCTION OF HAVEN AVENUE Is encourage land uses and development consistent _ To PROVIDE FOR ADMINISTRAn vE with the design goal for the Haven Avenue PROFESS1oNAL USE, wE ENCOURAGE, corri dor as an intensive, high quality gateway 11pN~• ~into the cortmunity. ~ G~~~ rrn+r Si1DULD sERVIDE LII•E B.1. The primary land use function along ArailsoN, TOPEKA sANrA FE. Haven Avenue is intended to be of an rNls AREA Is MORE su1TABLE As A administrative/professional and office TRAI.6ITION FROM THE OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL nature. L6E TO INCLUDE THE POTENTIAL POR Llrrr RtrD. wE SUGGEST THAT TIfE g,p, Select ancillary commercial and business LANGUAGE BE PRw1oEO w A NEw sEC. support service uses shall not exceed le.Al IN TtOSE AREAS ABVrrlw RAIL po; of the floor area in any Master sERVICE Llra= LIGHT RESEARCH AND oEV• Planned development. Concentration of ELOPnaNr uses ARE PERMrTTED IN ADDInoN such uses in any building or along the To 71RSE uses SHORN IN B,]. street frontage is not permitted. wE REOUESr cLARIF1urION REGARDING 6.3. The following land use types are A FOOD PARK USE IN ThB: W1VEN OVERLAY permitted or conditionally permitted DISTRICT. Is IT PERMISSIBLE TO ALLOIT within the Haven Avenue Overlay WITHIN AN OVERALL INTEGRATED FOOD PARK District. All other uses shall be A VARIETY OF RESTAVRAKf3, SERVICES IN• prohibited. CLUDING ~~FAST-FODD;• IF SO, wE SUCLEST A FURTHER DEFT NITION REGARDING FOOD PARK BE INCLUDED IN TABLE REGARDING B.] -2- Permitted Uses Administrative and Office Financial, Insurance & Real Estate Services Communication Services Medical/Health Care Services Pro`essional Services Administrative Civic Services Culturzl _ Business Supply Retail Saes & Services" Business Support Services Eating and Drinking Establishments Conditional Uses convenience Sales & Services' Entertainment Food and Beverage Sales Hotel/Motel Personal Services Recreation Facilities Public Assembly Public Safety & Utility Religious Assembly Ancillary Uses limited floor area per B.2. wE sUPPaRT THE INTENT OF TH is SECTION 70 PROVIDE A MASTER PLIW TO ASSUR• INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT AT THE EARLIEST FOS-, nLE TIME. NE sUGGEST, /I011EVCR, TiAT THE WORDING gL50 REFER TO THE NEED TD COORDINATE DEVELOR.IENT EFFORT OF LOGICAL MASTER PLAN BOWmgRy 1111GRE 'IfiESE gREAS ARE OF COI.fgN INTEREST AND INTENT. RATF¢R THAN REFERRING TO EITHER SINGLE OR MULTIPLE PROP£RTY ORtffRSH I P. 11E REQUEST CLARIFICATION DN IR6N AND 11liY THE C I TY PLANNER MAY RE- OUtRE MASTER PLANNING ADDITIONAL AREAS WHICH M/1Y LIE OUTSIDE TIE OVERLAY DISTRICT, INABMUCN AS THERE BOUNDARIES HI1VE ALREADY BEEN DEFINED MI7HIN THE INTENT ANp PtATPOSE OF THE OVERLAY DISTRICT AS S//OIFry ON E%.V-2. C. Master Planned Development Services to 20: of the The intent of this section is to provide for integrated development at the earliest possible time in the review process. Through the Master Plan process there is opportunfty to coordinate the efforts of single or multiple property owners and discourage piecemeal development. The City Planner may require master planning of property outside the Overlay District, adjacent to a project proposal, where necessary to assure integrated development and promote the goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The following standards shall apply to all projects and should not 6e constrained by parcel lines or specific site boundarfes: C.1. A conceptual Master Plan shall be submitted for Planning Commission approval together with any development proposal, including subdivision or parcel map aDPlications, to address harmonious site plan relationships and potential for shared access and open spaces, and reciprocal parking. Master -3- Plans shzll indicate conceptual building ITEM c-~ wE suPPaar nns NA~Grtlx pad locations, points of ingress and Clr THE NOfiDING BUT SUGGEST CHANGE egress, parking lot configurations, REGARDING THE ABILIx ro USE EITHER conceptual grading and drainage, A CONRrNATION OE ARCHITECTURAL landscape and plaza areas, pedestrian STATEMEM OR CONCEPTUAL ELEVATI GF6, ilrCU laL10n, and signs. In addition, a statement of architectural intent ;p~'Jor conceptual elevations shall adequately specify haw the architectural concepts, ' including style, form, bulk, height, orientation, and materials will meet the intent of the architectural standards and uesign goal for Haven Avenue. C. 2. The Master Plan boundaries indicated in Figure V-2 are logical planning r TEM c•z wE suPPONT THE DaAaDAR~ES boundaries based upon physical or THE AasrER PLAN AREA Rvr REOUESr con trzi nts and property ownership. 70 E%PAND THE MASTER PLAN earmARr These boundaries may be modified when it LbCATED AT ii-IE NEC or aTH sTREEr is determined that the Master Plan is AND MAVEN As sHGwN oN THE ATTACHED consistent with the intent and purpose ~'a'T• of t':e Haven Avenue Overlay District. ('. 3. No Parcei Nap or SuDdiv is ion Map shall De accepted or approved without concurrent submittal and approval of a Master Plan to assure integrated developmen: consistent with the goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. C.4. Architecture within Master Planned development shall have a compatible design style with variation in the building style, form, and materials in accordance with the architectural standards of the Overlay District. Lot Size C.S. Minimum parcel size shall be two (2) acres with a minimum parcel depth of 225 feet within a Master Plan development. A 3D0-foot minimum lot width shall also be required, consistent with the access control policies. The Planning Commission may waive these requirements when it is determined that the parcel is part of a Master Plan which is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Overlay District. Atl lots of record are allowed to develop according to the requirements of the Haven Avenue, Overlay District. -4- Access ITEM C-6 SUGGESTS T1AT THE WORDINGS IWfTH M'1 gppROVED MASTER PLAN CBE ADDED lb 7)iE END OT THIS REQUIREMENT C.6. Vehicular access onto Haven Avenue shall be discouraged wherever suitable alternative access may be developed from other streets as determined through the Mzs ter Plan process. If vehicular access onto Haven Avenue is granted, said access shall he shared with adjacent parcels. The minimum distance - between drive approaches shall be 300 feet with I00 feet tfie minimum distance between a drive approach and the Curb return of any intersection alonD Haven Avenue. Also, reciprocal parking and access easements shall be required, where appropriate, with any development proposal MITH AN APPROVED MUSTER PLAN. C.7. Public transit facilities shall 6e considered within all Master Plans. Convenient pedestrian access shall be provided to designated transit facilities, such as bus stops. C.B. Dn-site circulation for both pedestrians and vehicles shall consider existing or planned cfrcu lotion patterns on adjacent properties. Connections shall be made where appropriate to foster more integrated development and enhance Dedestrian movement. D. Site Orientation The following standards are intended to promote integrated, pedestrian oriented, office park development in a campus like settfng: Pedestrian Orientation 0.1. Site Dlanning, including building configuration and placement, must create opportunities for courtyards and plazas and other landscaped open spaces and promote safe and convenient pedestrian movement with continuous landscaped pathways between buildings. -5- D.2. D.3. Parking D.4. D.S. D.S. Parking areas and circulation aisles along the Haven Avenue street frontage are discouraged and may only be approved through the Master Plan process when it is determined appropriate anE necessary to implement the design goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Their visual impact shall be fully mitigated through dispersed parking areas and extensive landscaping and berming. Vehicular circulation around the rear and side portions of a site is encouraged. Lircu lotion aisles which fragment or disrupt the connection of pedestrian spaces throughout a project shall be avoided to the extent possible. The use of dispersed parking areas which provide convenient access to buildings without interrupting interior pedestrian spaces is encour aced to reduce the need for large barking lots. Where large parking lots are necessary, they shall be located in areas less visible from Haven Avenue and their visual impact fully mitigated with buildino Dlacement and extensive landscaping and berming. On-street parking along Haven Avenue shall be prohibited. Building placement at or near the streetscape building setback is strongly encouraged within all developments, particularly on corner lots with high visibility. Multiple building Dlacement should provide variable streetscape setbacks to reduce streetscape monotone. Setbacks D.7. A 45-foot average landscape setback and a minimum 45-foot building setback shall be required along Haven Avenue, as measured from the ultimate face of curb, including existing lots of record and condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral Dart of a Master Planned development. -6- D.B. Ancillary service and loading areas shall be designed and located where least visible from public view and adjacent prop ertfes designated "Industrial Park". D.9. All existing and new utilities, including electricai service less than 34.5 KV, within the project shall be _ installed underground. F. Landscap ine Reovirements The intent of the following Standards is to enhance the visual qu zl ity of the streetscape and provide an attractive and pleasant workine environment in a campus tike setting. Minimum Landscape Coverage E.1. A minimum twenty-five (25) percent of net lot area (excludes right-of-way dedications and private Streets) shall be land stayed areas and pedestrian hardscape plazas and courtyards. E.Z. the Landscape/hardscape coverage requirement may be modified for individual parcels within master planned developments when it is tletermined that the master plan as a whole meets the required coverage and the project is consistent with the intent and purposes of th=_ design goal for Haven Avenue. E.3. A maximum five (5) percent credit toward the required landscape/hardscape coverage may be permitted where appropriate pu6l it art is to be displayed in a setting which enhances pedestrian spaces and building architecture. E.4. A consistent streetscape design theme shall be developed along the Haven Avenue streetscape which incorporated intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, alluvial rockscape, mounding, meandering sidewalks, and appropriate street furniture. Landscaping materials shalt be selected which provide an historic link to the _7_ City's past, such as eucalyptus windrows, citrus trees, and grape vines. In addition, a program of street name monument signs shall be developed to include low profile, natural alluvial rock monument signs with individual letters formed in a sandblasted concrete face. Berming E.S. Landscaping and berming shall be designed to create visual interest and ' variety to the streetscape, enhance building architecture, screen utilities and buffer views of automobiles, pavement and service areas, and to define and to distinguish the pedestrian environment from vehicular spaces. Water Conservation E.6. A combination of water conserving landscape and irrigation techniques are required such as the use of drought tolerant plant species and hardscape (non-irrigated) surfaces, and special irrigation systems such as drip emitters, low volume stream rotors, deep watering of trees and shrubs, tensiometers to measure soil moisture, and automatic timers. E.7. Landscape materials shall be selected for their low maintenance, drought tolerance, and heat and wind tolerance. F. Ooen Space and Pedestrian Environment The intent of this section is to Dromote the functional design and location of pedestrian spaces, and provide convenient pedestrian circulation on and off site and promote a campus like setting. F.1. The development of a pedestrian node or focal point, such as a Dlaza or courtyard is required within all projects. -8- F.2. The location of plazas and courtyards should encourage maximum pedestrian use and be sevarated xnd/or buffered from vehicular parking and circulation. Such locations may be near a prominent building entrance or along a centralized pedestrian path. Pedestrian facilities .F.3. Pedestrian plazas or courtyards shalt be designed to create an attractive, comfortable, and functional setting with ' a "sense of place°. A combination of the following des ion elements are encouraged, but are not limited to: pavement or surface texture; elevation/grade changes; use of landscape materials and structures to provide shade and define enclosed spaces; seating (eg - benches, steps, or raised planters); and outdoor eating areas. In addition, the use of water features, covered walkways,~and public art are encouraged. K~a~ F.4. Trash receptacles, drinking fountains, light standards and other street furniture shall be designed to enhance the appearance and function of open space areas. F.S. Convenient pedestrian circulation shalt 6e provided throughout all Drojects to connect parking areas and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open spaces. G. Architecture The following standards are intended to promote a hfah quality office park image with high prestige identity: Urban Style G.1. Desirable architecture along Haven nEM ~-~ xE suvaaer n¢ mrvcerr Avenue shall project a high quality OF HICi1 WALITY Pnocseessive nNU progressive, sophisticated, and urban 80PI/1571 G1EO ures~w srne of oE,rc~oP. style of development. While the use of acrrt. a variety of exterior materials may be permitted to achieve this image; Spanish, Mediterranean, or traditional architecture styles are not generally considered aDDropriate for office buildings. _g_ G.2. Variations in architectural styles, construction methods, and materials for certain ancillary uses, such as restaurants and banks, may be Dermitted where the architecture is exemplary and consistent with the high quality image required for Haven Avenue and where a particular design is necessary and more appropriate considering the intended use of the building. Multiple Story G.3. Multiple story buildings of sufficient mass are encouraged that reflect the scale and proportion of the Haven Avenue right-of-way and streetscape setbacks. Low, linear buildings are discouraged. ITEM G-~ I/E QUESTION wHETMER TiE G.4. LORDING REGARDING OOIlTI NUOU~ GLAZING RHIfN MAY BE COPSIRUED TO PRECLUDE AROiI TECTURAL ELEVATIOFS REMINIS~NT GF TIE MODERN COiTEAYORARt' BUILDING S110i AS TIE BARION OFFICE BUILDING. ~ SUGGEST TWT A pIFFERENT RORDING REGARDING CONTI NUONS GLAZING BE INSERTED OR THAT THE wOI1DING COIJfi NUOLS GLAZING BE DELETED. Building design elements that are considered inappropriate for an office park atmosphere include retail type storefront elevations (linear configurations, continuous glazing, multiple doorways), and numerous overhead roll-up doors which promote concentrations of ancillary commercial and business support services, and are therefore prohibited. G.S. Service and lDading areas shall be screened from public view and adjoining properties, wherever possible, to reduce site design constraints on future adjacent development. MAr Architectural Variety G. 6. Architectural planes 4bd11 have ITEM c-a APPEARS To BE REDUPDANT variation in depth and angle to create •I TI ITEM G-~ AND Tres BOULD sucGESr variety and interest in the basic form TNAT IT BE ELI MIWTED OR n+AT Ar and silhouette of the building. LEAST MODIFY FROM °SNALL~TO MAY:' G.7. Articulation of the elevation surfaces is encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns and provide variety in the building plane or surface. -10- G.B. Building entrances shall be well articulated and project a formal entrance statement through variation of architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscaped plazas. G.9. Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjunction with variation - in the major form giving elements of a structure. Signs 6.10. A coordinated Uniform Sign Program shall 6e required for any development, including wa17 and monument signs. Buildinc wall signs shall consist of individual letters and can signs are prohibited. The size, number, typical des ion and location of the signs, as permitted by the City's Sign Ordinance, shall be submitted with the development application and be reviewed concurrently. H. Urban Centers The following standards ace intended to promote the highest quality development and intensity to create community focal points or "urban centers" near the key intersections of 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard, as shown in -Figure V-1. h.l. The applicability of these urban center standards for specific parcels shad be determined through the Master Plan review process. H.2. Multiple story office, and professional, ~7EM x-z ME surwnT n¢ ooncear of buildings of the highest design quality wan.Tl•S'IORY OFFICE/PROFESSIOHNL are required, particularly at the eu/~oirvcs of H~o¢sT oun~ix oES ica+ innnediate corners of 4th Street and eirr w/sw .~ noo ~ ~,cE~ ~ .~ Foothill Boulevard. Desirable ^lprEL TYPE DESirl!"IN AOD~r~ON ~o structural components include steel, and ~bFFICE/PROFESSIOfL1t ." concrete in conjunction with curtain walls, spandrels and glass. Wood frame structures are discouraged. ar+ncc -11- H.3. A minimum thirty (30) percent of net lot area (excludes right-of-way dedications and private streets) shall be landscaped areas and pedestrian hardscape plazas or courtyards. ~rEr+ w-+ wE suPPORr nr/E coRCEPr H.4. Special landscaping and streetscape of sPEC~A~ ~ArmscAPinc AND srREEr- design features shall be developed for scAPE oes~c~ FEA1lIRE5 AT nriE - the intersections at 4th and Foothill to wrExwr ENTVIN~ ro rHE cinv. create an intensive and prestieious gateway entry into Rancho Cucamonga and the Haven Avenue Avenue Corridor. H.5 AE SUPPORT l1iE CdVOEPT OF PAftlC~NG srnucnmes ro PROngrE moRE ~ RrErs ~ F~ Eo oEVe~oPr+Errr. The use of parking structures is encouraged to Dromote intensified development and maximize the site area devoted to urban pedestrian plazas and courtyards. Parking structures shall be harmoniously designed with the main building and located around the rear or side portions of the site. H.6. The minimum parcel size shall be five (5) acres unless waived 6y the Planning Commission when it is determined that the parcel is designed as an integral part of a master, planned development consistent with the intent and purpose of the Overlay District. -12- FIG. V-1 HAVEN AVEtVUE ~~~ OVERLAY DISTRICT ~ Urban Center Y" Overlay District TRAILS/ROUTES o O o o Pedestrian • ~ ~ • BieYcle ~, ~-~ Regional Multi-t)sa Special Streetscapel Landscaping Power Line/ Utility Easement ~-•^- Creeks & Channels n Britlge Access Points ~~{??' 1Park Fire Station 5' 10 ~w Acres .r~s.s•<t ' 0 800 160 A00 ~. 7 S t ?, Sbq ~ wewo a y a - ; u .~~. wwrw s u , ~~ ...e...,, ~ ~ t ~ „3 ~. L I 1 i ~ n.eaenst i ?,-~ ~` IiI! r ~l ~- ~ ...m.„ ,~ =;' f £SM:; r. £: ~ FIG. V-2 SUGHESREDTERVREQUESTEZ~I/ES MASTER PLAN AREAS '~ CIRCULATION ® 120' R.O.Vd. ~ 100' R.O.W. 88' or less R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE ++++F Existing +++++- Proposed TRAILS/ROUTES 0 0 0 o Pedestrian • • ~ • Bicycle /~,~~ ~s' Regional e l i-U s Mu t -°-w^ Spacial Streetscape/ •"°""°' Landscaping Power Line/ Utilky Easement ~•••~ Creeka 8 Channels I~ Bridge n •~ Aceecs Points c~ 1Park © Fire Station G 10 Acres 0 40D' 800 1600 ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: Febrva ry 4, 1985 ', To: City Council and City Manager ~- ~ F''~ Prom: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Depar [went Subject: LIONS pAR1C COMMUNITY CENTER MDD IFICATION Gt7~M0 L~ ~9 z ~ y,, > ~_'' $ Z -____ ~.D 1971 ~ On January 16, 1985, as you will renal 1, the City Council authorized the hallway/office modifications [o the Lions park Community Center in an amount not tc exceed $4,900 based on the estimate of costs which I presented to you. That estimate was, unfortunately, not reflective of the bid results. The lowest responsible bidder was Young Contzactor of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount of $6,550.00. This exceeds the amount authorized by $1,650. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: staff requests that the amount authorized for the proiecG be increased to 'a not to exceed' figure of $7,500 (bid plus 16; construction contingency) and authorize a contract to he let to young Contractors for the purpose of pro vidynq the desired building improvements. Further, we request authorization to acquire sucA office equipment (desk, chairs, file cabinet, etc.) as needed to properly opeza to ai Liona Park Community Cen tat. As before, funding for the above items is covered by the Recreation Services Enterprise Fund. if I can provide further information, let me know. :,: /,!T DATE: February 6, 1985 MEMORANDUMV T0: City Council and City Manager / ~',I~, FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Eng inee~//~1~/ SUBJECT: Offer of Dedication - Parcel~'Map 1589 2~i~~ j 9C ~„ I ~ ~i F rp ih 19i Consent Calendar Item "J" on the February 6, 1985 Cnuncil Agenda is a resolution accepting An Offer of Dedication of a 30-fcot strip of London Avenue north of Lemon Avenue. This dedication was offered to the founts in conjunction with Parcel Map 1539 in August of 1973. The dedication was a requirement of the subdivision but was offered by separate instrument. Under Section 66477.2 of the Government Code (Subdivision Map qct) (attached), Offer of Dedications are irrevocable and may be accepted by the public entity at anv time. In conjunction with the development of Tract 12523, London Avenue will be constructed as a 26-foot street utilizing a portion of the sub,l ect Offer of Dedication. In order to provide adequate width for vehicle anA emergency access to the tract, it is proposed to accept the Offer of Dedication and construct the street, Attached far your information is a request from an attorney representing the property owner• subject to the dedication to withdraw that offer, Also attached is the City Attorney's reply and relevant backup material. I have met with Mr. Davis and his client, Mr. Miller and indicated our intent to accept the Offer. Mr. Davis will likely request to be heard at the Council meeting and questipn the validity of the Offer and threaten suit. Mr. Davis has indicated that as a condition of the City accepting the Offer, he. wouid like an agreement from the City accepting all maintenance of the strip and preparation of an appraisal of the impact of the street dedication and improvement on his property values. 1 have indicated to Mr. Davis that the City will maintain the dedication and improvements consistent with provisions of the Streets and Highways Code but that these provisions do not relieve the property owner of certain obligations. As concerns the appraisal, it would serve no legal or public purpose and is an unwarranted expense. it should finally be pointed out that Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map 1589 will be land-locked without the subject dedication. Parcel 3 is owned by Mr. Miller. CITY COUNCIL MEMO RE: Offer of Dedication - Parcel Map 1589 February 6, 1985 Page 2 RECOMMENDATIDN It will serve no purpose to explore the legality of the Offer of Oedication at the Council meeting. If, in fact, the Offer has some defect, the action of acceptance would be invalidated. This can only he determined by a court of law. It is the Staff's and City Attorney's position that the Offer is valid and should be accepted. I would suggest that you receive the property owner's input, adopt the resolution of acceptance and refer the issue to the City Attorney for further review. ~sp ctfully s b / ~ i LBH:' attachment ~~ f i~~ si i ~~,~: ~ s,:~ .~ ;, ~I a ~,~- I IA S i ._ .,. ,~--- ------ - ,-a ------ ----~-- -- ---- g I s;~ :: '~°_` S ~'r s.. ~ 9'h ._ ;. a ~i, .~ T ~ __ ~.r .._,. ... sn+. ... +-n.o .rre• ro i d l 1 I rv 0 If ~!; ~ - c ~ I 3 t ~' z :. ql~ ~ .z.e. ~. ze „, ve i ~ ~U i N A ~ ~ i r I ;1 ~I ~ .. ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~'~ ~; __ _ HERMOSG _z63~. ^, r::'; r-a.~:--___FbFNUE__._ ~.L_-~=~-~~* ~;~. jIt ~ ~ TRACT 7007' MB 90 /b3,64 ~ ~J '~~ ~ Q, b~; c.+t. {a . ._ ~ V _~ 4 5 ''^a ~ ~ o yyyy fs..~33 y ~~. S ~ s: C .1 ... ' ~ 'n~'~~ ~ iyiE C °e v'q~p ~3. ~} ~ :: e ~ y g~ > ~ q r.., ~~``i A ~'"4ix m ~` ~~ frgt~ ~~~ p t; ,~~~ °~ pi ~~~~ ai ~ ~aF `~ ~y suc~i a ~ Z,~ v i _o~yo,_ *' ~,1 y, N~ dq~;i4 ~ ^59~ ~a 2~p e4e ~R7 ~~~ \~A~ 'ff~1,C, o ~a ~ lr ~,c ~i y ~7M CY~ep atl~ z r~~;l~vyg ~' u, m' ~'~ 3i 3 ~;gym $; \~Jl iW goo ~'i ;.~p~ ~~iq !>) ~ k grr0 t~ \~ ~~ s,3eZy' 4I»z+ ez ~~ °rjN_ Yr Z _ W „'. i COVINGTON b. CROWE ~TTO wrvE.s n T r. o ~. [v S.PE ET ~. ~.i rea rsaJ 1131 WEST Si%T H ~~ ~ POST OIFiCE d0% X615 _ ~ v v- ~ OIaTPRiO, CP..icOarvin 91)62 ~ 1985 31 - , , , January Mr. James S. Davis Attorney at Law 8350 Archibald Avenue Suite 211 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Parcel at 9780 Lemon Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Mr. Davis: Your letter to Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which is dated January 22, 1985 and which concerns the above-referenced parcel has been given to me for reply. Your letter was sent in an attempt to withdraw an offer of dedication for public street purposes which was made at the time your client's lot was subdivided. offers of dedication for public street purposes, which are made in conjunction with the subdivision of land, are governed by the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Please see Government Code §66477.2 which in summary says that such offers of dedication, subject to CCP §771.010 are irrevocable and may be accepted by the public entity at any time. The offer to dedicate in the case of your client's parcel was made by written instruments recorded on August 3, 19$3 in Book 8239, Payes 744 - 748, inclusive, official records of the County of San Bernardino, California. Your client, therefore, had at least constructive notice o£ the irrevocable offers when he purchased the property, and he is chargeable with kno~~:Ledge of the law as it pertains thereto. The City of Rancho Cucamonga plans to accept the dedica- tions in the near future so that public street improvements plan for the area may be completed. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please Mr. James S. Davis January 31, 1985 Page Tti0 do rot hesitate to give me a call. Very truly yours, COVINCTON S CROF7E, ,i' J- ROIIERT E. D?UGHERTY City Attorney for the City of Rancho Cucamonga RED:sjo cc: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga b.p.s.: I see no reason for you not to put the previously made offers of dedications before the City Council for acceptance. games S. i~auis, Esq. ATTORNEY AT LAW e~50 Arcnroala Avenue Seae 211 Rancho Cucaman9a, CA 91730 v ..,~~.~~ Y.+i,v1 Mr. Lloyd Hobbs City fhgineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Rd. Pancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Subject: Parcel at 9780 icmon Dear Mr. Hobbs; ~:I i'1 ':u 74!1CHU CU'~;SAitl~:4 iriR'd4Ei'I;'lu G.li5f;9 January 22, 1905 ~71d~997~7900 I am the attorrney for Mr. Rick Miller who is the sucessor in interest to the above property. It is Mr. Miller's understanding that the former ovner, Mr. John Beale had made an offer to the city to dedicate a 30 foot stzip running nozth and south ~ the parcel to be usei for a roadway. That offer is hereby witFdrawn. Mr. Miller was not aware of this offer until rec~ltly and wishes to discuss the matter with the city before the project proceais. Please contact my office when convenient so we can set up a meeting to resolve the situation. and keep the delay to the city to a minium. Sincerely ~ f ~~ .,1. `e. ~~ [~~ James ~. Davis i C n _ i _ O _ ~ . _ _ _ -j _ _ 9 . _ n C - ' _ _ 1 .'. n ~ O « C .. _ ~ _ _ _ _ E V - ~ _ a ~ _ ` O ~v i __~ 2_ __ _ L _ 9 C __ CCV O C __ __ O c J~ > _ _ L > V .^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _'_ ~ _ _ .i 9 0`1pi".._u _ .. ~~ ..L 9a ..~ L E v ~ ~ - v c _ L ° ' ~ o ~ ~ ~ c ° ~ ' ° ~ 5 c ' u 3 ~ m c ' a ~ . c c ; ' ' L ,.^. Jc a ~ v _ . b = i s u j _' ~_= r ^ ~^ N~ n„ 'J+ _?' O '. 2= N 4 c~ 8'°o rr ~~~°J L ~=S~~O E` ~ -' ~° n d ~ n'tt >cc~ u _ - ~"' o . o E °_ c . ~ ~ = - E i ? 5 ~ ° c ° ° L L t E ^ - ` c E ~ c ~ ' c o . o c J ; c " -- ~ E _ . ~ y ~a ~ ~ o_t _ . 'c u o EPgc=% =?o4~,i. a$-4:y ..P m3 c= '" '- - tE.. o? . ~ - ~ O_ O C C ~ C b ._ - E ~_ . i_ .,. _ c - 2 9 ~ 0 y .. m E C CJi 3 L i~ L~ V L L L % w f S ~ C _ > y C T G 2C - _ - ` .~ _ , _ ~ O~ ~ tl - q :2 C- O r r a G v ~ ~ OO. Jn c ^- S a O. o ~ .^'. 3 c~ a L O A O ~ r G Y V h U ~ ~` O ~ L .) O . '. . E . _ j . _ _ ~ Ea-.,~oo~~ a4cL ac t~ ~t E ==i~L 4" E G> c' W - ~ _ . E o ~ Win;% ' f c ' E it cc. c..c ` >. N c a = n ' ~ v o "c a 3~0 8 .c: ~ a u 7 U L ~ n L C L C '' ~ C n ~ a w L~~ m ~ L _ J ? _ _ g O C T ~ = 7 Y m J n_ O= ~'~ ~_ t N ' - ~ E i_ G- c i'" E p a ~ G l U .^~:,C hi ' _ _ _ ~ O-L nC._~'~L >C O~J_LC CE.L LnLN L n G ~C n -- T Y V u O_ m- ..u LL ~ pEFa=O O E _ ..Gi _ .'. .0 .. .p U C - j C ~ _-_ L - _ - _ - _ _ _ ~ o ~ - ` - o ~ o `E _ _ _ E - - c O L .. .'_. C_ _ _ LL C; _n_ _~ u_ ; C l_ C C~~ j i ~` c 3= j j L-- C L O c ~~ t-~ ='1,0 cE ~ ~ o= c_~_= V. C _ ~-- _ C L~ C~~ ~ 7 C c_S _ LYp C _--_ c c L ~~- c o i- - - j c c - °_ ° c c 5 _ o a -" c%`o~- of _- ~'~ ~^1qC~ C pG > LV-. _ ~ i 3 j C b~_ C C Y C-Oa aC-. .. X07 C`L .~. O 0 C^^ ~ p L Y v a q C C+ _ q q O~ i L 0 4 T: r~ G O N a OL,.. iA JL L. T A ~'O _ r c E c o p- .. 2 c C :. - V i L T n .J ~ a~ .' O C_ = n C y C. . L^ E o ~n5 - o'q~cto~o. `a =~s ;;i„n-~t >~°.E -~ E 'ob' o.- 4 r 2 - c: >. _ ~ °o c Y ~ c; ~_:- r o c .c o_ 4 _ ., r c y b~L2 O:.-C Y.y C'JL OLS COi~~C.L ~LO?OLi.O:in O'L. L 0c=o eG ecc a'`~Lm L ;Eianr~ ~o'~~~m ~ n E c m ~ .c - a v y>. o 0 0 st ='o ~ E~= a 4 ^- S c c u d~ c„ E ~- S a' r '. ~ c rs= t;[„ -s. c o°' 4 a E E c n vn ~occ.O iEtt°-^~+ °__' 'L BE'=~L~°Eou$ o ~` E c G ~, p, n c c c r ~ _' ~ = r'c o 4- N' °. b ` -~ L S _ .C C y-~ p r. T y J O_` 2 3 C C^ r 'p. I L 3L: T q O 4 .`. ;~ `O GT~`•'_•CLCCL OCLL--.`.~~ ~LLL4LyL p L_ E F a L o c? u E c '.~ =.} ~. o 'c ~~ z 3 i i >. 3 `- t~ 3 ~t~ ``=A:L^k5r2L.c _ ac ~ c`E c'~Ggc E: oci-. :. r. o'O5?~: - - o`LLCC?oe p S 1 `n N O 4 t n v 7 2~ H O C"~^ p~_ L C 9 9 a 2 C V a ~ a .. L" ^tY=O ~ - E o ~ c c ,~ ` c^?~- ~ s v 5 0 ._ u? c 5~ a o a° c o L - `rC0 -C i. y0C myO> yL UC~~Ca ~i4 ~'~OiCL 'i O,tn~40n~-a>TO b'c_u N K..t ~~ua ~E "'ucT=:'-nf o o<` ~O ~qc t ~~b -c -:=n.?=u..-oL ~c,~ocrm'otocEE6 .L n 'i-p9~ ~~ ce tNC='.,uy„' EJ 4 ~.E M n`' 2 n u n 'a.-c c c ~~ ici ° c E ~? V>> ~ ~ L E u c~?„ i ` ~'i O ~ A O ~ d 6 C L~ O n N b a S L G -. O L GL L C_ C - ~L' Y oL - _ C r t Q _ L ` d G _ _ _ _ _ L - O ~ ~ p C 5 ~ °_ 3 j v E _ E c L ,. _ s - - p - ~ - N - - - _ ~~ ~_ _ _ L -~ ~ L p V •N~ L Y = G _ C - _ __ O .. v ~ Q _ C - ~ ] U d _ _ o __ _ _ -_ i s Y c _ _ _ .. u c c ~ y m ~ c - °' - _ - - _ W-- - = eY ¢ O b ~ Z -_ ~ J J _ _ - p U O m C U T J ' OiO m _ ____ O _ d- _ ^L `p E r tt L - - - iJ .t VI C .`. L - _ _ _ - Y f L :..C i . _ _ n. Y F _ _ O_ V f-_ i V ~ yi I- ~ ° t ~ E u m ~c __ ~ c_ __ v -__ - x c c - > o: c >,a, g r t n c J t -° a~= o f ~ c t o? t c T " f~ j L .~. ~ G. ~ C O ~ p 9 n? O C Y E y~ ~ .. L j n C 7_ E j L = ~ n f c`_; c ~ ~~ o c ' ~ o o c c 'c L o J r F c¢~ ~ E a _ ; L ` T' L °° w f " q ' ` E . E y __ v S~ C C G J O ~ ~ C ~ . . ~ . p v = J:O ~ i. ~ E c L L N °~ °~ or E ~ "='o E ~~''-> _ S ~o E C C ra.~ . = G . u: ~~. Z . _ ° __ _ C b n N ~ y L V ~-, c E:=; ~ F S C G G y p N 0~ 6 S C ^',vc r ._ ~_ 6 - L E v Q c = = = 3 _ ,. P _ ~_-~~._ _ ~ » 'cc E:~=~ ' '_L nL C ~. Y J ` U E Q _ d~-"c tee - . t ' ~ j L _ ? L ^ CL OL 1 _ v d o.. E ~~ .. Y ^ .. _.- :C_ ~'a .. ?LID VO= ~~~P ~-~ = ..pa: c ax c:o C .~L ~ a - E= i ;. ~`: 4 ~e j :, i E s m^ L'= 3 ~ p e ., NE j 2 ~ q `o ~ W E ~ ~ v j E ti c° c ` ] pcc oo`o~~°~ E t_LroG N~"'O o UG.,ce ora o oL~_~ = ~ a O_ G C= .. _ p~ .. n` j c_ G O O ;. 'n " O 'a .Ui, ` C p u S 9 '~ $ L~ a n N c_ .. _. O C[~ c .c ^.~ G L « C n p L O L~ O L` a L ~~ 'J v - _ _ i O E C _ L C P c c U J` C ('i ' O ~ C_ t_~ y rrC L:'c = ~_ '- a o r~'r ~ i c 9 ~Ec' o pay rc~c- "°~c- -_ _ O[` S '. L c f L a ° `O ! ' J-^: o c G „ 'c ~_ L= N L L- ~ ~. O j C. ~ v O '^ n G C« L ~ ~ .. _ t L L G_ C L ~„ o? ~„s ~= =c5 L EcE ~ 5 _ =--cc f ~ ~ U L C o`_~c._LO `' ,~ V U ~= '~ E' n ~ _ C C_ °n~L ~__ ~ L Y vL U L n O U~- Vey _ ~ ~. ' - ' ^ .. U' 9C-^1:.-L °.. yl~ LC-'.]T •~ ~..~ ` ~L ' ` ~ ~ `)tyi. OLD ~LO~ NyC:J'.`.L Up " pL L~ p~_ ~ _ O- ~ G ~v .] L, O U G_~ L 9[ C ~ C ~_ P L C _ 1_- C C-nC O° 1 C C p` L Ea.L~CO_ C Y L O ~v O C ~ wt c ° ^ ¢ ' ~ ? ~ _ cFE a ^ ' 2 C ^ ~.,t ] ?-,t ;c 3 -~~ ' eE E ' ~ Y - p E ,= - ~p ~r Y L _ .~ O G O s L `..' >'. .^- ~ L. 'J .. L O C C 'J• _ ~• L^ p 9 J n .. P v v. J p W GL L =W LC-..G.aL ~,[L' CL ~Cq O}T~2'" nGEL y O NV iOECa Eq YJVLG U_yv~ .~ U 9LOC-~Ep..~;'- -.i jL. '..Li .~~ ~ U pt_ cjL E c`~2 E L- _' T?ULLU zL _ q`9 L.. V ~vb . u ~>.c .. ms:. z. y? z m m o' o L ~ Fx ~ 1= ~'0 2 c e a= :, E N w pc _ _ o '.• e c "' m~ c c_ a a E° ~ ' ^ m Z c Y 4= `c a~ a c?_ 9 0~ p ~ c o L^ c~ Y ° L-~ c ~~ ~ Q ~ ., o c n ~EG~ o f~~ E~ LNL a ~ „E aL„ ~ ,o ]EaaE=~ _ ~ gN°EcE N an _ I I ~~ .~ W t 9 Y rc 9 n 1 O z ] N Y C w c<<<'~~~~~,,y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~,~.~~~~~ ~`~` c~~ tic b~IEA~IORANDUM ^'~ °~ '~ .tAN19E5 !' ~~~ ~ = ° :<ECEIVc~- ,wn ~ ~ 'sue .a~ To: FR02 SUBJ -~ -- -- - ~- metav:u ~a~ n.. i. ,....,nrr J., .. r.. J.Nwr...~..1.. M •....a .sn+J N~~ .wM aIUO ...i ..e F•.nnw a. Gr..IM1Mr.1.....Y .1 n.... .z J mM.: : J u.~c.~.,..~, cw. o. w. w un. dmto Nexmu[ex[[n svuL tira`~« tam ~~a ^oae J.. ...l m. arr:et ur u[geN[lut :..r o......,en s.... s.. ~.... IC...n.+.l cM. fN. mfm a. sn...-. an.. - NoinNwq. _ la..za i wrgx [t Nxe., ..e ovum .nF.n.N.l u oY.venT[ u w 6VMTY ai.M Lq.a WFY. •w.: ..rM~u ra Pn.e ,CJiI~.,.~.[AeddThI11G1.AY ~. [WO NNM1Rq..~~r.J•u vM. fAa.. •Nrtl n. n( Itet Sa.~lOOIIIILL gM1L1f ffNT LOOAM I11AR INI. f... (.r rr n .N.e In faoL xa .! n. r.. ,.n n. r.e.re. oe ..u n.nq. Iu.rlaa .. (auw.: Mcet W1. 1 (L[[xllTf ft[xgl . x..rn zo.oN (.a .! m. qa na(.( ..u La n. f~MgI~MJ .l (I~NWl fVMO[~ Tn. c..( 1x.00 (..[ .( ul. L.t f!, q[IRIML tM lwtl, 1.00 fl.! tMMO[. fML[L N0. 1 ! tel.nlul...O. p.E r..ol .[ I.M buM.d N lollT.; on in. [.n ]T ro. v.a uM .( .Ne rMrl N.. z; an tM s.utn LT . Ilm tMt a r.ulbl rlm .M .Onnt ll.00 (nt Nnrtnnlf .f aM .. .nIM .e .. fo. oo !.a .u., . m.,m on ..u Tr..t: t AM o ro. Ne.m, ..~ er 1 ex . .. t. tn. n.rm..a .M n..lnf . .n.. .( zo.ov x..l .na . r.. L.m[n~•v.m m gin. ,~+N. nn. a nm nrcn N.. z ..e unN~t r. ..u o•nu.l un.. ~~~~ ]019Ta Lt~ C1 ./ nf(/J L7 (-' C 4. r,.r aon9219 ,W 7aa Gw[91a Yur wYMYiaY ~ V.I SYlYWla____° wr__JYlY..1G`lYl]__ Mr4 r [rur hMr Y YI w tpLaai_L~a~i.iM.DUam e. ~lin!•S___. __ wru• uM YrMw~ ~nMYMYYr wrM•y~rYwwl wl Y wM~lrwrl u u Yrl -t~YY_rIwYN rM wr, [li[YI I IYxr~rrrrLJ Aw ~ Yr rlynnhV` MY~I hlw u N M rYl [wM w IIW _~1R,l,~gc~_ aew Yrw rlaYlwlr MrM1rl __rr A_ _ n h1Mr u wI['nrrr Y+tYlrMrrx w .~~ rrF• i .rte. 4Yrrr, Ir • VlI r1. wnM1 Mn w l ...... ~~ ~iry~l Imir fruri ~r ~ill~ rn1 fwrl~ r~r qur i a c ~~q £g: 3E7 §. J Yw rl a~Y ar4~ 4 Yw. w. M.wrwY..+.. rur.r,w war r+.......eY wr.r Yw YYM .. ..r MrMww W fir. u+rwrW W rYw Yrwrn ~IYYMrw'YW •• Mw~ wlY Wwew sYVrww' ~ ru Irwl Y • rrwrw Yw Ywn wry alA1Y y W M yMrl rnl . . . . h , . ... ... . . a . .. .... NYw wY/Yr l+~ ww _, t_~ .;~ ~~._ ¢~Desas ,.I gas SKIS 25 SO CERI ~FY tNAS 1)(¢ OPFYA OP DEDTGS30N OJNVEYED BY S1R {iITNIX IHST0.lDRNI t0 TNC COUN[Y Ol SAN BERNARDINO~ STASE OP GLIFORXG~ A BOpT OORPOMSE AND POlli[0~ IS NE0.¢DT AIXNONLEOO¢0 DY IN¢ UND¢RSIGtI[D OFTICER ON DEHALF OP IHE BMDD OI ¢UPE0.VISORS P)RSUANT SO AUTNORISY WNP¢RRED DY RESOLDSIDN OF IY1¢ BOARD 01 DUPERV:BORB ADOPTED ON DECF10E0. lB~ l9)2 AND 1H¢ OFFEREE WNSENTB SO SIR PECO0.pASfOH 'MEMOP EY It5 pN.T ADiNORIEE; OPYIEER~ RMSDANI lYl PNOV(SIDNS OP CNAPIEft IE.) OF DIVISION) OT tIT1E 1 OP S1R WV¢0.`BRHI CODE DI 1)1E pSAR OP GLIPO0.NIA. ~ yyr w'rto: X' .' ~ 3 eT: 14Utf11eis.. ~N 1~ COUNTY ENGINEER ~ ~ ~ ~ emB2J91u, %ar ta..r.m 1.Y-nw.~_L. ~. :1 ~ asY e.:. ,:nuaneeul n tan. r. orrm n.neu.wr.ru• r.Y w~.Yr.o. 531 s wr •' G ~ ~ •>mr tg +r Ye .rnm=~wr~ m c.me'.e. nmrn w, ;u~n~a J mr. '.. ~.r.r.enr.ar.a.r=raware. mwn apuei r. .:o .•wa '~ q~~~~' T 1 ~ 1 a n. r..wX.na.wr.m e' . ~ r eme.r arrb aew il. y~~ 3 R]I009 ~~ OrrN 1 NO RE t E ~' 9RWT OR lISCYfMT ~iw wrrru.~lrt CxY'- ! ~ ~L n.wXUtnt.Yrwer rH l0.«il +. w..rwG a¢re. C---~- Xe.ra er rvDrnlrw. o n. wr. Xwrt a s. sent Xrn•e~X ( em .~r. - [1 ~~~1I ..MYM OMIrTI\Iar1r [TRCY 6r'C41r XC]rIIRID010...a[r r Irk u0 W'.Irl. or rnr uru [.XIVN.~YiN[IRlri la XMlYniW WM lunppO ntr,ow.r..I rna. rY C~- lerle•in. a..arrw<ornwrrY rntl uJ Cwiur ilr. Se 6 LO Ir.a of tit E.r[ Ir.l( of let I9. 1cT.r11 Ct TFMTV.55 rylltT CMTGMI. t .. p r X.p e.taf JrE to Beat IL al X.DNr pr6. ]G, FF.erE. e( 1IJ1 ICRIWCtIp tWC. X0. ]. fgYNfY. (.l J I Y l So r ]1 Q o.rre a. w ~'__ d 4. ^- ~ ~. wnwnYlMY OXO[91F w~ uu~w _ _ J0/ 19l] ]u y _ _ p 1 , ~. Iw w r u ^ r / ~ r nrwlX .rr rcPeE.R rnL r.K~n pal1 ...._ r ~YYX ~rN<Yr• /nr n.. y~Iu n rr. cennNwunnuuo me. n.r..nrwnwr onto rrpr..wl nem wurgr reuo..mnalnr eur.r u..r.r r. yr r... ~.~.~~.... ~.. lma ~~Irrr '"" 'Liii • . ~ r+</rrrt wlfN[II F1~/ warlrerrl.rY. r1 1're ~~ wlu ril~t[r.~ !`!/IG- WRin/L -~ -- ..._ N;,;,;,:arr:;; a-„c..:;:cs;~ar mezss N(E gas ~~ '~ TXIS SS N CERTIFY '1'NA.T THe SNTWST tM A[AL PMPI1.tT WHVEVEO BY 111E 4IIHIN INSSRUN¢HI 10 110: WUNYY 01 SAN BERIUMINO~ STAYS OP ViI.IFD0.NtA~ A BODY WRWMTL AXC ' WLt'tt C, t5 F~0.EBY ACCEPFED BV Tid NNDEPSIQiEO OPR¢t ON BEHAV OP TIE ROAM OP SUPE0.Yf 500.4 PVAS'rAM 10 AVINDRIIY WNFEpPED BY RQSOIIIl'IOry OP SH¢ BOAIO OP SltPepVISOL4 ADDITE^ ON DELEl01E0. 1B, 19]1 AND SHE LtUM¢¢ WNSEtT5 30 R¢WRMTIDN TIICRCOP BY ITS DDLY AVTWRIZZD OPPI2R. r DATED: ~~Y!~T3 6Y 4~CLGt~l1~e., ~ ` auxiY exclxeeN F- ,. ,~ d 1 T' Gi ca r ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 8 -l ,~ PREPARED BY DON OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2061 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE SUITE 206 IRVINE CALIFORNIA 92715 (714) 752-9082 FEBRUARY 1985 ~, ~~ RANGHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-2 lJ AGENCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUOAMI7NGA PROJECT: ASSESSMENT DiSTRiCT A4-2 - (ALTA LCIMA CHANNEL IMPHDVEMENTSI TO: CITY C~UNC II FNGINEEP'S REPORT PURSUANT 70 THE PROVISIONS 1'1F SEf i I ON 1UZil4 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHU/A YS .ODE PAGE 1 Pursuant to the provisions of the "Munir~pal Improvement Art of '91'.," being Givision 12 of the S'r eets and Highways Code of the State o£ Califprn~a, zed .n accnrdanre with the Resolut~nn of Intention, he.ng Resolution No. 85-i9, adopted by the Clty Council pf the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIJGA (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), in cpnnectlpn • with the proceedings for ASS F.SSMFNT DISTRICT 84-2 -(ALTA LOMA CH AIJNEL IMP ROVEMENTSI (hereinafter referred tp as the "Assessment District"), I, submit h?rewith the Report for tho Assessment District, coneisting of five (S> parts as follows: PART I Plans and speclf~cations for the proposed improvements are filed herewith and made a part hereof. Said plans and specifications are on file in the Offir.e of the City Eng rneer PART II An estimate of the cost of the proposed imprOVemPntS, including incid?ntal costs and expenses in cnnnect~nn therewith, is se* forth on the lists thereof. attar had hereto, and are on file in the Otfice of the City Engineer. PART III A proposed a':-a ^.=mn•it of the total amount of the costa and expenses of th.~ .r rcand imprpven'~e ntr upon the .averal subd~vis'nns of land wit•i~n the Assessment D'str~<t~. ~n proportion to +i•n e•~rimated hennf~t= to be received by such subdivisi^ns, from said improv?meats, is e:et }orth upon the RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD R4-? • PAGE 2 assessment roll Bled herewith and made a part hereof. PART IV 4 diagram showing the ASSeSCment District, the boundan es and the dimens~nns of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Gistr~ct, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention ~s flletl herewith and made a part hereof, and part of the assessment, PART V Description of the work for the proposed improvements and description of all rights rof -way. easements and lands to he acquired, if necesrary, ~s ser forth in the assessment and report, and made a part hereof. PART I • Plana and specifications for the proposed Irnprovements ere filed herewith and made a part thereof. Said plans antl specifications are on file in the Office of the Clty Engineer. PART II Project coat have been estimated on the entire pro leer and contributions from the city and the county are subtracted from total project cost to detrrmine the portion to be assessed under the assessment proceeding. The cost estimates as prelim~narly approved are shown in the first part of the following table. Coat estimates as confirmetl are to be presented ~n secpnd part of the table. f.'ity and county funds are from appropriate flood control funds dedicated tp antl contributed for the completion of the pro~e<t as shown in Exhibit A & B and summarized below. AS PRELIMI- AS NARIIY APPROVED CONFIRMED EstimateA Cost of f_onstru<tinn: f __________ f Estimated Incidental Costs and :~ Expenses: f___.________ f Estimated Total Cost: Estimated Contribution f E ___________ ___________ f f RANCHO CUCAMnNGA AD Q4-~ • PAGE ? Balance to Assessment: E E ___________ ___________ PART III ASSESSMENT ROLL MUNINCIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF t9 t3, DIVISION t2 pF THE STREETS AND HIGH'AAYS CC`DE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. WHE P,E Ac. nn the E day of Fehruarv, P?AS, the City Cquncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califs rn•a Iheroinattpr refplrpd t0 r "AgpnCy") did, pUr6l:Pnf to the prnvlsiona of the "Munlnc,Dal ',mprevem~n* ac. of t'a rq ." hp.r,q Divis'on IZ of top Ftree+s and Highways Code of the Stag rat Califnrn la, end a= amended, adnp* its Reso'~utinn cf in+~. -,~~on No. FS-39, for the construction o! certain puh'Ic Improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant worn •n connertion therpwlth, in a special assessrc,enht district known and designated as • ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. P~A-7 fAL7A LCMAA CHANNEL IMPROVEMEN?S~ fherelnafter referred to as the "Assessment District"): and WHEREAS, said Rpsotution of Intention, as reouired by law, did direct the appo rntpd Supprlntendent of $trpets to make and file a "Report," consisting of the fnllowinc: a. Plans; b. Specifications; c. Cost estimate; d. Assessment Diagram showing the Assessment District and the Subdivision of land contained therein; e. A proDOSpd assessment of ihp costs and ezppnsps of the works of imoroveroent levied Upon the par<n3 and lOt9 Of Iqnd Within the boundaries of the Assessment Dlstrir,t. For particulars, ref erencp is made to the R?solution of Intpntion ae previously adopted. NCriU, THFREPnRE, I, LLOYD HUBBS Suoerlntpndent of S*rppts rlty of RANT HO CUCAMONGA, pursuant tg the "Munin<ipal Improvement Act of 1913," do hereby submit the following: 1, I, eursuant to the provisions of law and the Resglutinn of Intpntion, have assessed top costs and expenses of the works of improvement *o be pert armed in the Assessment District uron rho. nareels of land In the A^^•es3ment District benefited thereby in direct R P.NCHO C.IIf_~,gMONGA AD 84-2 ?AGE 4 proportion and relation to the estimated bPnef,ts t0 he received by Pach of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, 2 ropy of which .s attached hereto. ?. As required by law, a Diagram is here*•~ attached, shnw,ng the Assessment D,str~ct, as welt as the Dountlaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and enbdivisions of land within said O,strict as the Same PxiStPd at the temp Of the passage Ot Sald Resolution of Intention, each nt which subdiv,sione n+ land or parcels or lots respectively have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and ~n said Assessment Roll. 3. Tho subdivisions and parcels of lantl the numbers therein as shown nn the r¢spective Assessment Diagram as attached hereto Correspond with the numbers as app¢ar rng on the Aseessmf nt poll as contained herein. • 4. NOTIOE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that bonds will b¢ Issued in accordance with Division 10 of the Streets and Nighways Cptle of the State of faliforn,a (toe "ImprOVement @ond Art of 1915"), to repres¢nt all unpaid assessments, and the last installment of said bonds shall mature a maximum of not to exc¢etl fourt¢Pn (14) years from the 2nd day of July next succeeding !4n f 10) months from their date. Said bonds shall b¢ar int¢rest at a rate not to exceed the current legal maximum rate of 17% per annum. S. By virtue of the authority contained in said "Munint,pal Imorovement Act of 1913," and by further direttlon antl order pf Agency, I hereby make the fpllowing Assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the works of improvement for the Assessment Oistr~ct basetl on the costs and expenses ae set forth below: fi. The Method of Spread of Assessment is as set forth in Exhibit "F", which is attached hereto, ref¢rencPd and so incnrpor ateA. In Conclusion, ,t ig my opinion that the aSSP6Smenta fOr the abpv¢^ref PrpnCed A9geaSme.nt District have keen spread in tllrect accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the works of improvement. / DATED: February 6, 1:+85. // r r L ~ / BY ~lc~ D~"""~y"- ~_ _/ _ RANCHO CUCArdONGA AD P4-7. PAGE 5 SUPERINTENDENT OF SThEEiS CITY OF RANCHO CUl"A.AV iNi3A COUNTY OF SAN RERPIA HDINi1 DATED: February E, 1905. ~~- S ENT E-'- VEER `_ PART IV The assessment diagram for is set forth in Fxhih rt E. PART V Tho description of works to he constructed Is as follows: 1. Improvement of the existing Alta Loma Channel from • 1,3`2 feet north of Hillside Ithe )unction of channels 3A and ;R, see Fi gore 4, page 14) youth to the existing Alta Loma Basins. This work includes: a. providing concrete lining with fencing to the Channel; b. providing new culvert structures and street ~mprovementsat Hillside and Wilton Avenues; c. constructing a new spillway Into the existing Alta Loma Basins located north of Ranyan Street 2, Construction of a new debris basin (Basin No. 3) with a spillway and a dam at the north end of the Alta Loma Channel; 3. Provision of new 33" pipes and street imnrovemente to complete the connection of storm drain "~F to the Alta Loma Channel; ~. Modiflcatinn of the outlet at nwture from the East Basin (Basin IJO. 2) to the existing Haven Avenu? Storm Drain. Provision of a new equalizer and street imprpvemente at Hermosa Avenue between the two Alta Lnma Basins. The necessary right of way and the aporoDr~ate right of way tertif icate are set forth ae Exhibit fi. gANCHq f,UCAMONGA AD R4-^ PAGE 6 I ~°_^-•M ~ ti'aa,,.,Q as CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANi,.HO CUCA6'J".GA,~C.OI ''t F SAN BFRNARDINiI, CALIFORNIA. do herenv certify that the foregoing Ass?SSmen^, tnge•her with the Diagram attar hod thereto. was filed ~n my -off .re nn the F day of February, 1985. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~A I , ~G,4_..~-, _~._ P"~t4_ _ _ as CITY CLERK pf thq CI?Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C LIF RNIA. do hwraCv <or+.ify that tr,e for?going Asaessmen[, tnaethyr with the D.?Dram attached +herete, was aporoved and cnnf~rmed by the p,;6_,~,,,9_ of ;aid Clty on the J(f/~ dny of clTV r_ieRK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BF RNARDING I _L LPfO__1d,_!'~U~~S _ as SUPFRINT F.NOF_N? OF STR F.ETS of said CIiY qF RANCHO fUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, de hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram attached thereto- as- recorded in my off,ce on the ~~ tlay of _ t 38s U F D~T OF STREET; CITY F RANCHO CUCAMON~A COUNiY OF SAN BERNARDINO C RANf_HO CUCAMQNfA AD 04-Z PAGE 7 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 8 EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT D EXH1817 E EXHIBIT F FXH!BIT G EXHIBIT H EXHIBITS Estimate of Ccat as Preliminary Approved fetimate of cost as ccnf lrmed Preliminary coat estimates Assessment roll Assessment diagram Method of spread Assessment engineers qualifications Right-of-way Certificate :~ • EXHIBIT A RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-2 EXHIBIT A PArE 1 EXHIBIT q ESTIMP.TF OF CnSTS AS PREI IMINARILY APPROVED I. CONSTRICTION COST Based on eng,neers est,mates (see exhibit C) ASSESSMENT TOTAL COST CITY COUNTY GIST 94-: Cons?rurt,on est,mate t2, 102,9P•4 £275,76; £20^,'?•7 x1 .E24 lf',= 5% Cnnt,ngency f105,149 x95,027 £10,1?;. x0 Total cOnstruct~on f2,20R,133 £370,790 3; 12 ,F5t='• x~,F'L4,7A= C J II. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION Adm,nisiratinn ;50,000 t0 ;50,00;,' f0 Survey ft15,000 f0 ;115,000 EO Soils and testing fF0,000 fR t60,0(10 f0 Total f225,On0 f0 5225,000 SO III. INCIDENTAL EXPE NSES EIR lAD P7-2 & AD 64-2) 516,906 f16,9.09 f0 f0 Design Eng ;205,000 f205,000 fG f0 Assessment Eng t36 ,000 t36,000 t0 f0 bond Counsel f22,a21 f22,421 f0 f0 P,nancial Conslts ;20 ,ono f20,00U fU f0 Reg,stration Costs f15,000 i15,00U f0 f0 Bond Pr rnt~ng antl ;5,000 SS ,000 iCl f0 Servicing Bond D,scount 7,5% f123,fi09 f25,910 f0 ;103,729 Total ;449,607 f3a6,139 f0 ;103,726 GRAND TOTAL ;2,093,000 f716 ,929 $437,g5g f1,726,512 • EXHIBIT 8 RANCHO CVCAMONOA AD R4-2 • EXHIBIT R PAGE t EXHIBIT B ESTIMATE OF COSTS AS CONFIRMED I. CONSTRUCTION COST Based nn contract Aids ASSESSMENT TOTAL COST CITY COUNTY DIST 84-2 Con8truct inn estimate 5% Contingency Total construr?ion II. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION Administration Survey • Solle and testing Total III. INCIDENTAL EXPENSES EIR fAD 82-2 k AO 84-2) Deelgn Eng Assessment Eng Bond Council Finant~al Conslts Reglstratinn Poste Bond Printing and Servicing . Bond Dlecount 7.5% SPecl al reserve t0% Total fiRANO TOTAL • EXHIBIT C RANCHO CUCAlACNGA AD 84-? EXH I R I T f-. PAGE 1 EXHIBIT ••C" SCHEDULE OF UfJ1T COST AND LUMP SUM AMOUNTS PRELIMINARY • CONTRACT ITEMS Oestriprion (Unit Estimated Item No. Price in Words) CJuantity Un rt Prire Tctal 1. Clear,ng and Grtibhinar L.S. L.S. (90,000 7. Traftlr Control L.S. L.S. f15 ,000 3. Develop Water SuPPIY L.S. L.S. $10 ,0(1a 4. Fini-h,ng Roadway L.S. L.S. x7,000 5. Roadway Excavation, 7600 C.Y. f7.00 $5';,200 H~Ilside poatl. Wi~sOn Avenue and Hermosa Avenue 6. Englargnment of Alta 5000 C.V. (3.50 f17 ,000 Loma Basins No. i and No. 2 7. Excavation et Alta 35000 C.Y, (3,50 SiC2,500 Loma Basin No. 3 8. Ditr.h Excavation 23000 C.Y. ;7.50 f177. ,500 9. Class 2 Aggregate Base 1000 C.Y. s24.00 524,000 10. Asphalt Con r,rr.te 2100 tons (35.00 (73,500 11. Place Aennalt Concrete F00 S.Y. (7.50 f4,500 (Misc. Areas) 12, Prate Asphalt Concrete 400 L.F. f2.50 51,000 Dike 13. Asphalt Emulsion 2 tons f500,00 f1,000 (Pant Binder) 14, Driveway and Driveway 500 S.Y. 522.00 f1t,000 Approach 15. Concrete Sidawalk 500 S.Y. f22.00 511,000 f6• WIdP.) 16. Curb and Gutter 2200 L.F. ;1D .00 s°C,000 17. 16" Splash Curb f5,600 tH, Cnncret e, for 2500 C.Y. f110.0n fZ75,000 Trapezoidal Channel ig. Reinforcement Steel 147000 Lbs lF) f0,45 S6R,t50 for Trapezoidal Channel 20. Controls tnr 520 C.V, f7. 17,00 f112,840 Rectangular Channel 21, Reinforcement Ste~•I 103000 Lbe (F) f0.45 f46 ,3S0 for Rectangular Channel 22. Concrete for 250 C.Y. (FI (275,00 ffi8,7li0 Transitions 23, Reinforcement Steel 95000 Lbe lF) f0.60 f21,000 for Transitions RANCHO f,UCAMr)NFA AD 64-2 • • EXHIBIT t, PAGc 2 Description (Unit Estimated Unit Price Total Item Ne. Price in Wnrds) auantity 00 !3:0 g?S,niin 24. Concrete for 10'x Z' AO C.Y. ( F) . „_, ^` Box Culvert RP~nfnr<ement Steel 24000 Lbs (F) f0.40 f?,APO for 1U'x 8' Rox Culvert 00 !300 00i~ f•+2, 76. CnnrrPte +nr 12'x ?' 140 C.Y.( F) . Box Culvert l ~ ,000 Lbs 4 (F) f0 40 ft8 ,000 27. Reinforcement Stee . fnr 12'x ?' Box Culver? Y lF) !2`0.00 !179 ,7r,0 26. Concrete for Onuble . 456 C. A'x fi' 90~ Gilvert (F) fO.bn t96 .000 29, RP~nfortemPnt Steel 90000 Lbs +or Double R'x 6' 0ox (invert Y 560 C (F1 f7_O fi.On !'12.000 a0. Concrete for Alta . . Loma Basin :JO. 3 SP~Ilway t Steel f 7fl000 Lbs (F) f0.4`., f35,1i1O 31. orcemen Rein for Alta Loma Basin No. 3 Spillway Y 0 C (F) 1720 00 539,600 32. Con v Pte for Spillway . . 1fl Sta. 3.62 ?n Sta. 4.42 bs 7000 l (F) f0.45 43,160 g3. Reinforcement Steel . for Spillway Sta. 3.62 to Sta. 442 S L f5,000.00 f`„ 000 3q, Modify Haven Storm . . Dram Inlet Y C !21.00 to?,?00 35. Ro r.k, Light Clase, for . . 1900 Cnn<reted-rock Slope Protect~nn Y 0 C f50.00 (36,000 3g, Minor I:OnCrPtP for . . 76 Concreted-rock Slope g7. Protection Rock, 1-ton Class, for 700 C.Y. f25.00 ft?,500 Rock Slone Protection ffl$ 00 E5,440 38. 4B" RCP (1350-D) 64 L.F. . 00 !67 S1,ERR 39. 36" RCP (1500-D) 24 L.F. . 00 f6S ER.070 40. 36" RCP (7350-D) 7fl L.F. . 00 f105 !32,130 41. 36" RCP (1350-D> 306 L.F. . C.n nrretP enc asPd 00 (67 f35.1a6 42. 93" RCP (tA50-D) 576 L.F. . f60 0n 44.9:O 43. 33" HCP (1350-D) 77 L.F. . 00 !59 (5,074 44. 30" RCP (1500-01 B6 L.F. . f66• M E1,?7? 45, 30" RCP !13`0-D) 34 L.F. !45 00 fa,Onn 46. 24" RCP (1500-D) 60 L.F. . f43 00 f5,5O4 47. 74" RCP 11350-0) 126 L.F. . 900.00 f1 f6,70U 46. Manhole "A^ 3 Ea. , 2oD.nn s3 f7n,2nn a9. rat<h Ras~n No. t 6 Ea. , 700.00 (9 43.7~O S0. Catch Basin No. 3 1 Ea. , 00 (60 51. 10" VCF Sanitary 72 L.F. . f4,320 Sewer, Hermosa Avenue f3 000 00 52• Sanitary Snwrr Manhole, lea. fA,00n HP.ImOnd AVPnuP RPNCHO f.UCAMDNGA AD 94-2 EXH I6IT r GAGE 3 • Descript,on (Unit Estimated Item No . Prue in WordFt CTu amity Unit Pr ite Total 53. Alta Loma i3 assn No. 3 L.S. L.S. f17 ,1100 Inlet 54. Type a'MP Inlets 23 Ea. f1,500. 00 534,500 55. 24" 17.-Ga. Corrugated 54 I_.F. ;40. 00 (2,150 Steel Pipe 56. 9'-6"x 6'-S" Corrugate 136 L.F. (225. 00 f30 ,600 Steel Pipe-arch 57. 6' Chain-link fence 10500 L.F. (5. 00 (62.500 58. 4' Walk Gaffes 7.6 Ea. f300. On (7.800 5'?. ?5' Cna~n-IinK Double 2 Ea. 51,200. 00 f2:ann Drive Gate 60. tE' Chain-link Doubly 2 Ea. f1,500. 00 f3,000 Or•,ve Gate 61. Pipe Gate 8 Ea. f800. 00 f6,400 62. iy~c 36R Grate 23 Ea. f300. 0n fF,?nn 63. Water Line Relocat,on, 48 L.F. f100. 00 (4.800 Hermosa Avenue 64. Water Line Relocation, 6A L.F. (100. 00 f5,800 Hillside Road 65. Water Line Relocation, 12 L.F. f10U. 00 f1,200 • f6. Wilson Avenue Inlet "B", Hermosa L.S. L.S. 515,000 Avenue 67. Permanent Tratflc Signs 5 Ea. (100. 00 Sf 00 68. Traff,c Markers 74 Ea. 540. 00 S.'.,?60 69. Field Office and L.S. L.S. 512,000 Laboratory TOTAL f2, 102,384 • EXHIBIT D 7 n U RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD R4-2 EXHIBIT D PM9E 1 EXHIBIT D ASSE55MFNT Nn . _ TAX AS S'c $SOR NO. DISCRIPiION BOC1K PAGE PAR TRACT NO./LOT 201 71 5 201 71 6 201 71 25 tot 71 26 201 71 3fi 201 71 36 201 R3 4F 201 R3 47 201 g3 4R 207 R3 49 201 13? 1fi 11F09: 201 132 17 11509/ 201 132 1R 11609/ 201 732 19 11F09/ z01 732 z0 11F09/ 201 132 21 1/F09/ 201 132 22 5441/ A 201 13Z 23 9441/ 4 201 132 24 9441/ 4 2n1 132 25 0441/ 4 201 132 ?6 9441/ 4 201 132 77 9441/ 4 201 142 17 9441/ 5 201 142 18 9441/ 5 201 142 19 8441/ 5 201 142 20 9441/ 5 201 142 21 9441/ 5 201 142 22 9441/ 4 ?n1 142 23 9447/ 4 201 142 24 9441/ 4 201 142 ?5 ;1441/ 4 2n1 142 ,^R 7441/ 3 201 142 27 x441/ 3 201 142 76 7441/ 3 201 142 29 9441/ 201 742 30 9441/ .3 201 152 1 • 201 152 13 201 15~ 14 201 i52 16 9441/ 1 201 152 17 9441/ 201 152 1R 9441/ PAYMENTS PRELIMINARY CONFIRMEC DURING CASH A'dJUId ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT CAILECTION TO LIES f 5,209.59 f3fi ,467. 12 (65,773.08 556,309.52 f4R,112.4F 553,934.5E • *91,OF7.90 59,116.75 f17 ,773.99 f15 ,745.71 7 f4,R45.F6 2 f4,6R1.37 9 (4,681.37 4 (4,228.95 5 fe,g 77 .OF F (4,405. i7 4 (4,140.86 3 f4,1g0.P.6 2 f4,1gn .A6 7 54,052.75 6 54,052.75 5 54,220.96 4 54,052.75 3 (4,052,75 2 (4,317,06 1 (4,052.75 0 54,052.78 9 (4,052.75 R 54,052.75 1 fq,140.RF 0 fa,05.^.75 9 54,052.7$ R (9,052.75 7 f3,964.E5 8 53,964.55 S (4,052.75 f 3,612.24 (4,052.75 (4,052.75 0 (4,140.66 9 (4,740.85 R 54,052,75 • i RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-Z ASSFS S'dENT NO. TA% A$SE5SCIR NCI. DISCRIPTION 6OC1K PAGE PAR TRACT NO. /LOT 201 152 19 8441/ 7 201 152 20 9441/ ~ fi 201 152 71 9441/ 34 201 152 22 94a 1/ 33 201 152 23 9441/ 32 201 152 c^4 9441/ 31 201 152 25 9441/ 30 201 152 26 9441/ c"9 201 152 27 9441/ 26 PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT ASSE55MENT !4,052,75 !4,052,75 !4,05?.75 !x,052.75 !4,05; .75 f4,052.75 54,140.96 f4,226.96 !4.052.'5 2C1 163 17 9441/ 27 f4,052 .75 201 163 1B 9441/ 26 !4,052 ,75 201 163 1g 9441/ 25 f4,052 .75 201 179 1 11609/ 7 !4,40.5 .17 201 173 11609/ 6 54,228 .96 201 173 3 11609/ 9 !4,140 .85 201 173 4 11609/ 10 f4,493 .27 201 173 5 11609/ 11 f4,SP1 .37 201 173 F 11609/ 12 f4,581 .37 201 173 7 9441/ 62 f4,317 ,06 201 173 B 9441/ 61 f4,140 .BR 201 173 9 9441/ 60 f4,140 .Ffi 201 173 10 9441/ 65 f4,052 .75 2n1 173 11 9441/ 64 !4,052 .75 201 173 17 9411/ 63 !4,228 .96 201 173 13 f171,4.56 .75 201 422 1 10045/ 16 f7,400, 66 201 422 2 10045/ 15 !4,052. 75 201 422 3 10045/ 14 f3,876. .55 201 422 4 10045/ 13 !4,052, 75 201 422 6 10045/ 12 (3,964. 65 201 422 6 10045/ 11 f4, 140. 66 201 422 7 10045/ 10 f4,052. 75 201 422 R 10045/ 9 f4,052. 75 201 422 9 10045/ 8 f4,057. 75 201 477 10 X0045/ 7 53,964. 65 201 427 1t 10045/ 6 f4,493. 27 201 422 12 100x5/ S !4,226. ?6 201 42Z 13 10045/ 4 !4,052. 75 201 42? 1e 10045/ 3 f3,964. 65 201 422 t6 10045/ 2 f4,4n!:. 17 201 422 16 10045/ 1 f4,R45, fifl 201 444 1 12237-1/ 1 f4,22P. 96 20i 444 12237-1/ 2 44,22R. Qfi 201 444 3 12237-1/ 3 f4,140. flF. 201 444 4 12237-1/ 4 !4,140. 86 201 444 5 12237-1/ 5 ;4,140. OF 201 444 6 12237-1/ 6 f4,140, RF EXHIR!T D PA13E 2 PAVMEN7S DUR I NO CA9H AM1l!" LOLL EI'TION TO L~: L \J RANC}10 CU[AMIINGA AD P.4-2 ASSESSMENT N TAY A55ESSr1P BCK1K PAGE 2n1 x44 201 44 201 444 2n1 44q 201 444 201 444 201 444 201 444 2n1 x44 201 452 2p1 4°2 201 452 ,n1 a5? zD1 45? 201 452 201 as2 201 452 201 452 201 457 201 4 52 201 457 201 a$2 2n1 452 201 452 201 452 2n1 452 201 452 201 452 201 452. 201 452 2n1 452 201 452 zn1 45z 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 452 201 e52 2n1 452 201 452 201 457 201 452 201 452 201 4E3 201 4F3 201 463 201 463 2n1 4F3 201 4F3 ~. N'1. D15f PIPTIQN PAP. TRACT NO./LOT 7 122x7-1/ 7 P. 12237-1/ 6 0 1223'-1/ 9 10 12237-1/ 10 11 72237-1/ 11 12 12237-1/ 12 13 12237-1/ 13 14 12237-1/ 14 15 12237-i/ 15 122'7_2/ R 12237-2/ A 3 1<^^237-2/ g 4 1?237-2/ +0 5 122^^.+7-2/ 11 F 12237-?/ 12 7 122'7-2/ 13 8 12237-2/ t4 9 12237-2/ 16 10 12237-2i 16 11 12237-2/ 17 12 12237-2/ 18 13 12237-7/ 19 14 12237-2/ 20 15 12237-2/ 21 iF 12237-2/ 72 17 17237-2/ 23 1R 12237-2/ 24 19 12237-2/ 75 20 12237-2/ 26 21 12237-2/ 27 22 12237-2/ 26 23 12237/ R ?4 12237/ 9 7F 12237/ 10 7F 12237/ 11 27 12237/ 12 28 12237/ 13 2R 12237/ 14 3n 12237/ 15 31 12237/ 1F 42 12237/ 17 33 12237/ 18 34 12237/ 19 1 12237/ 1 2 12237/ 2 3 12237/ 3 4 12237/ 4 5 12237/ $ F 12237/ 6 PREI IMINARY CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT f4,22a.9fi 54,3+7.06 14,317.06 54,278.9E t4 ,27R.96 s4,14D.RF f4, 140.AF 54, 14D.RF Se,14n.86 f4,OS2.75 14.052.75 54,0.52.75 $a .052.75 }4,052.7$ f4, 140.RF f4,228.4F ;4,278.96 f4,052.76 (4,052.75 ;4,052.75 54,0$2.7$ 14,062.75 54,052.75 f4,27R.9F $4,052.75 54,052.7$ t4, 140.8n 54,140.8E f4,052.75 ($,726.77 f5,$Sn.$1 14,0$2,7$ 14,0$2.75 14,SP 1.37 t5,F38.F7 f4,5R1.37 $a~n52.75 t4,052.7R t4,0$2.7F t4,5P1.37 1R ,550.51 54,220.9E 54,405.17 f4,140.0E f4,228.9E S4, 1411. Rf f4,052.7$ f4, 140.R0 (4,052,75 EXHIfliT D PAGE 3 PAYMENTS DURING CASH AMOI" - COLLECTION TO LIE RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD A4-2 EXHIBIT D PAGE 4 ASSESSMENT NO. TAX A6SESSnP Nn, D'FfRIPTICN BOC1K PA6F PAR TRACT NI?. /LOT 201 4513, 7 12237/ 7 201 463 R 1:227/ 20 201 a63 a 12237/ 21 201 463 10 +223?/ 22 201 4fi3 it 12237/ 23 201 4Fi, 12 12237/ 24 201 463 13 12237/ 25 201 46"~ 14 12237/ 26 2n1 463 15 12237/ 27 241 463 1R 12237/ 29 ^41 97' 241 921 2nt 9^+ 201 971 201 97.1 2n1 9:1 201 971 20+ 921 201 921 201 971 201 921 201 921 201 971 201 92+ 2n1 921 201 971 2n1 921 201 921 201 921 201 021 zDt 9z1 201 971 201 971 201 971 201 971 ^111 a7+ 2n+ 971 2n1 971 2nt 971 2n+ 97+ 241 471 2n1 971 201 971 201 981 2M 981 2D1 981 201 981 201 981 5 F 7 P 9 +D 11 12 +3 14 15 1fi 17 iR 19 20 21 22 L3 24 2~i 9 10 11 12 13 +a 15 18 n 1P 19 20 29 30 31 33 12237-2/ 12237-c^^/ 122?7-'/ 12237-2/ 12237-2! +22'.7-2/ 12237-1/ 12237- v 12237-1/ 12237-1/ 12237-1/ 12237-1/ 1;2;97-1/ 122'7-1/ 12237-1/ 12237-1/ 12237-1/ 12237-1/ 12237-1/ 12237-1~ 12237-1/ 8441/ 9441/ 9441/ 4441/ 9441/ Cd41/ x441/ 9441/ .:ae 1/ 9441/ 9a41/ 9441/ 9441/ 944 v 8441/ ga4v 9441/ PREL IMINAPY CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT (4,052,75 34, 140.P,6 f 4,052.75 f4, i40.E6 f4,22A.96 fA,610 .33 s7,F64.99 f6,872.0E fF,079. 13 s17 .a44.a6 • E4,140.R6 2 f9,140.P6 4 xa,140.A6 $ fa,14 O.A6 6 f4,14n.86 7 54, 140.AR 16 54,140.8E 17 54,140.86 18 f4,140.RE 13 (4,140.86 70 (4,140.86 21 f4,140.AE 22 (4,140.86 23 f4,140,P,5 24 (4,140.86 25 f4, 140.86 26 54,140.86 27 (4,140.86 26 (4,140.86 29 54,140.86 30 f4,140.PF 72 x4,228.96 71 (4,317.06 70 54,317.06 69 (4,057.75 F, p, (4,052,75 67 ;4,0$2,75 E6 (4.0$2.75 59 54,140.86 SA f4,140.R6 67 (4,/40.81: `8 (4,052. 75 55 (4,140.86 20 ;4,228.96 19 s4,DS:.7s 18 f4,140.Af 17 f4,140.P. C+ 16 f4,72R.96 PAYMENTS DURING I`A9N AM~"tUN" COIlFCTI(IN i(l LIE RANfRO CU~A!M)NGA AD 84-2 EXH181T D PAGE S u ASSESSMENT NO. TAX ASSESSOR N0. DISCRIPTION BOOK PAGE PAR TRACT NO,/LO7 201 481 34 9441/ 15 201 ?R1 35 9441/ 19 201 9R1 3F 9441/ 13 201 ?81 37 9441/ 12 201 481 38 9441/ 71 201 9R1 99 9441/ 5 201 481 40 9441/ 4 201 981 41 9b41/ 3 201 SR1 a2 9451/ 2 201 981 43 9441/ 1 PRELIMINARY CONPIRMED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT f4,22R.4F f4,a17.05 f4, t40.AF f4,O52. 75 54, 140.FF f4,052.75 f4,052.75 f 4,D52.75 f4,D52.75 f 4,052.75 201 991 10 9441/ 24 f4,057. 75 201 991 11 gn41/ 23 f4,052. 75 201 441 12 4a41/ 22 f4,052. 'S 2R1 991 13 4441/ 21 f4,052 . 75 10fi1 571 4 9441/ 21 f38,305. 80 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE PAYMENTS DURING CASR AMOUN' LOLL EI"TIDN TO lIF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD E4-2 EXNIaIT D rAGE 6 PAYMENTS ASSESSMENT N(+. DESCRIPTInN PRELIMINARY CnNFIRMED DURINn rASH eMI.UN" TRACT LOT TRACT NO,/LOT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT COLLECTION TO LIE' 1004E 1 100461 1 54,17.3.24 10046 2 10046/ 2 44,132.05 10046 3 10046/ 3 fa,07p.37 10046 4 1004F/ 4 44,052.7$ 1004E P 10046/ S 44,043.94 10046 6 10046/ F Sa,049.94 10046 7 10646/ 7 44,052.75 10046 9 10046/ P 44,05:.75 10046 9 10046/ ? 44,052,75 10046 10 1004E/ 10 s4,09R.P' 10046 11 10046' 11 x4,05; .7~ 1004E 12 1004fi/ 12 44,043.04 1004E 13 104146/ 13 ;4,079.18 10046 14 1n04fi/ 14 44,052.75 10046 1S 10046/ 15 44,070.37 t00a6 t6 10046/ 16 44,13?.05 1004E 17 10045/ 17 44,070.37 1004E 1P 10045/ 18 44,(143.94 • 10046 10045 19 20 10046/ 10n46/ 19 20 x4,043.?4 44,184.91 1004E 21 10044/ 21 f4, 132.05 10046 10046/ 22 44,149.67 10045 23 10046/ 23 ;4,143.67 10045 24 1n046/ 24 x4,202.53 10046 25 10046/ 2F 44,78 1.82 1004E 26 10046/ 7F 44,12;.24 1004E 27 10046/ 27 44,096.81 10047 1 10047/ 1 f6,326,ft2 10047 2 10047/ 2 44,343,49 10047 3 10047/ 3 (4,369.93 10047 4 10047/ 4 54,290.63 10047 6 10047/ 5 f5,2S(I.9f, 10047 6 10047/ 6 x4,24F.FR 10047 7 10047/ 7 44,369.93 10047 P 10047/ R fd,1F7,29 10047 9 10047/ 9 x4,061.Fg 10047 10 10047/ 10 x4, 14Q,F7 1004' 11 10047/ 11 44,123,24 10047 12 10047/ 12 44,167,29 10047 13 10047/ 13 x4,105.62 10047 14 10047/ 14 44, 178, 10 10047 1F 10047/ 15 f4,2SS,39 10047 16 10047/ 15 44,149.67 • 10D47 17 10047/ 17 f4,395.?6 10047 1R 10047/ 1P t4,32S,P7 10047 19 10047/ tg f4,334.5P 10047 20 10047/ 20 ;4,070.37 10047 21 10047/ 21 44,0P1.55 10047 22 10047/ 22 44,0''.1.55 RANCHO CUCAMONGA AO 64-2 EXHIPIT D PAGE 7 ASSESSMENT NO. OESC.R IPTION PRELIMINARY TRACT LOT TRACT NO./LOT ASSESSMEN T 10047 23 10047/ ?3 x4,359. a4 10047 24 10047/ 24 fa,157. 29 10047 2S 10097/ 25 f4,07R. 16 10047 76 10047/ Z6 f4, 132. 05 10047 27 10047/ 27 44,114. 43 10047 28 10047/ 26 f4,164. 91 10047 29 10047/ 29 46,105. 55 10047 30 10047/ 30 f4,91F. 17 10047 '.1 10047/ ;11 s4,35'.T• 33 10047 32 10047/ 32 54,413. 98 10047 33 10n47: 33 fa,443, 22 10047 34 10047/ 34 ES,OR5, 44 10047 35 10047/ 3$ 45,127. 61 10047 35 10047/ 36 f4,1R4. 91 10047 37 10047/ 37 f4,070. 37 10087 36 tOn47/ 36 f4,07n, :i7 1n047 39 10047! 39 f4 ,070. 37 10047 40 10047/ 40 f4,167. 2~3 10047 41 10047/ 41 f4 ,3fi 1. 12 10047 42 10047/ 42 54,493. 27 • tU047 43 10047/ 43 f4,R51. 65 TOTALS PAYMENTS C.ONF I RMED DURING CASH A61~ ~U N' ASSESSMENT CiILLE(~T Ii1N Tip '. IE~ • EXHIBIT E n f/ ASSESStiiENT DIACrRA1I ALTA L01~1A CHANNEL ASSESS~IE\?T DISTRICT 8~#--2 _; _; /-~ r N i - ',: \~ f tai-~.: C` - _ ' = ~ _~ . .p. 1 i~ ~ ~. Z I• ~~ ~ l >R. MZS .M.a( .+)M1„ w .W,R R.(IKLv rv5 ~V mr:r5'M. ..r.~ u[ I ~ • ur arv rt «~t1~~ .[. ~rti 9 0 5 ~/ a~Hrve i ~ ~~~ ' 1 (~ r 5 ' $GlE'-~'.~00' ,/, v n ' ~ iGIO ~ M . C[ ~ trv 'wK~i uO ~ ~~"'~ '!4rr.[H^R!rv .s4)iar e.ar[: LEGEND ''~ i i c `.' _ I I cwm vM n~s..K sTan -_ , h rl~V,r~ I ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ,p~ 1' rnwn..mns p ~ ~ ~ .eo<Irn va,uu. -. Y` pp111S1 w.our .~. ~` l'i I .ACRR NR W 9rvlLLS ~~ ^ .N[D tt+KrvNgrplf y ~4r srvivil O lw u ~o uMO N w n 5 ~ • r~ ~'' ~~ _ . tpiN •a T.C. ~.f rv1 n~[p aNMA•[ O~ yuw„c: b ~ ~ f-, ~ ; ~ .n r--1 v.< N .sxsswv..o !-~ ~f ' I 'v ~ ~ r s+ -~ ~ n.m w I' ~ .a rw i- w~a. ,. m ~ r..m rwevn t~"~-"vo ~ . ~ :1 C%1 I ~~ ~.` ~~ RECORD DI RLINC ~~~~v"~ mi• om~a~am~nm.rrK O.. r+..row..vc..~o.~. ~, ~~„-~ ~~~~~--'~ on aen « M nr a +..nm mcw~a. ~ }} Rcuovo v x a<rn „mv ama+,¢ro•rv a sTCns '' ~~ ~ M nor ry •.knO cv(ivaE. o, .R ~' I~•~'it~ ~-I w.sssr.r ..; vr.ro e. ~r :t~•nnwiw.+~a .rxi, T'T, wDn.o:Glf„Y,~M Y~.M1 M'v .SiIS+Kn T~A~u ~ 4 1f 1 ~.~ ~ i~I 1nj,~yiTast t M1 Y M X .K x. I ~.~-a-., ~-1 ~' S I .u[Wt ~ nS rnn>..rn l n. f. vT--~- ~'~-1 n ~.v[w f w nrc.wrv ~~~~ ~~~ u~ ~5~~ I „PMAtt r(ffM(~'O v( ~M1.'x~r T tug llM.nMO ~'.R :r'~ ~~ ~ ~'. '~~~ ~AMM1 RCPL(. Y % t0.nn Y Yrv RM.NrO .~w~Tx -~ ~~ ~ I {'Ofl :RUNTY RECORDER f'`:eYV.7J- I~~a ji' ~ G ~~ { :rw^.. ro vav,ro a,.w. vea • EXHIBIT F RANCHO CU C.4M0NGP, AD R4-c • EXHIR'T F PAGE 1 EXHIBIT "F" METHOD OF SPREAD (~F ASSESSMENT The law req!u r'es and th? statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provi5iona of the "Muninr~pnl Improvem?nt Art of 1g 13r" meet be based nn the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute dons not see r.ify the method nr formula ?hat should b? used in any special assessment disirirt proceedings. The responsibii~ty rests w,th ?ne Assessment Engineer, who ~s retained for the purpose .~f making an anaivais of the tarts antl determ~n~no the r.nrrc%t apportinnm?nt gf the asses^-meat obtioai~nn. For these prose?d~nas the City has retained the serv,ce gf D<•~ tlw~n Associates. Inc. Exhibit "8" is attached setting forth pr,or expor~ence of the Assessment Engineer. The Assessment Engineer then makes his recommendation ar the public hearing on the Assessment District, and th? f,r,al authority and action rests with the City after hearing a:~ testimony and evidence presented at that public hear~nq. Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, the City must make • the tinai action in determ~ninq whether or not the assessment spreatl has bean made ~n direct proportion to the benefits received. The method of assessment of the construction co:as and the incidental costs of the Alta Loma Channel improvements has <onsid?red the new development potential which lies within the drainage area, ingluding currently vat ani lands. Atl~ustm?nr to the base acreages as shown in th? County Assessor's Maps was necessary in order to account for gross acreage to put all lands on the same basis, adjustment for pro j?ct right-of-way was required for the program. Project coats were then spread among each parcel in accordanr.e with tha adjusted acreage of each parcel. g89 P. Acreage Per County Assessor Maps. The base acreage as shown on the f_ounty Assessor Mapa was used and ad nis led to the nearest 100th of an acr?. Resulting acreages per parcel ar? set forth in the labia entitled "Ad~ustod ACreayo " Ad tostment to hr~ss Acreage. Sinr.e the and?valpoed land wi<hin the bennf.t?d area is in some r. area gross land iprinr *o r.treet dndleatienl and in other sae o,s was finished lots, ?gaily of the assessment required adjustorent to an equal land ban?. A large number of the Intl hag baon devnlnped under development ayraem?nt agraeing to pay drainage fees based upon gross acreage anA, therefore, gross acreage was consldrred the beet boss to be used in the equation. All davnloped lots were equated tg press acreage through th? use ni an ndJUStment f;rcipr of 1.15 times finished Igt acreages RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-2 w EXHIBIT F PA ~E 2 to equate with gross acreage n1 the lot. The 1.15 frc for was developed ny examining the normal street dedlcatlon regw rement in comparison to normal lot tlepth. It was determined that 15% of the groes acreage was required for ded~catinn on the I'ot In the majority of dedication circumstances. The adjustment to gross acreage as shown in the third column of the attached au eape adjustment table. Adjustment for Protect Right-of-Way. Since the proposed protect will take land (for right-or-way purposes) from several of the properties, the required right-of-way was laid out and adtustment for land to he removed from the uae rf future development on each affected parcel. This adju ~:mznt for projert right-nf-way is shown nn the acreage ad)us invent table. Spread ofi Assessment Across Ad lusted Acreage. UGin, thz adjus?ed acreage For assessment purposes as developed an; set forth in the acreage adjustment ta61e, pro sect costs werz proportioned among the adjusted acreages for each parcel within the benefited area. C, J • RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 64-2 r 1 U EXHIBIT F PAGE 3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-2 BENIFIT SPREAD BASED ON ADJUSTED ACREA GE 1726512 .00 225.62 A-P-N ASSESSORS AOJ GROSS ADJUSTMENT BOOK PAGE PAR DIA. ACRES ACERAGE FOR R/W ADJ ACRES ASSESSMENT 201 71 5 0.6P 1.000 0.000 0.6R fS,209 .59 201 71 6 4.76 1.000 0.000 4.76 f36,a67 .12 201 71 25 12.14 1.000 3.620 8.52 E65,273 .08 201 71 76 7.50 1.000 0.150 7.35 556,309 .52 201 71 35 6.28 1.000 0.000 6.28 548,112 .118 201 71 36 7.04 1.000 0.000 7.04 553,934 .SP 201 P3 46 11.99 1.000 0.000 11.99 f91,8S7 .30 201 P.3 47 1.19 1.000 0.000 1.19 54,116 .78 201 03 48 2.32 1.000 0.000 2.32 517,773 .89 201 R3 49 1.99 1.000 0.000 1.99 f15,245 .71 201 132 16 0,55 1.150 0.000 0.63 f4 ,845 .68 201 132 17 0.52 1.150 0.000 0.60 S4,5R1 .37 201 132 18 0.52 1.150 0.000 0.60 (4,581 .37 201 132 19 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4 ,2^8 .96 201 132 20 0.49 1.150 0.000 0.56 54,317 .06 201 132 21 0.50 1.150 0.000 0.58 54,405 .17 201 132 22 0.47 1.150 p.000 0.54 (4,140 .66 201 132 23 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140 .A6 201 132 24 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 54,1411 ,96 201 132 25 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 ;4,052 .75 201 132 26 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 Sa,052 .75 201 132 27 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 54,2?8 .96 201 142 17 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052 .75 201 142 18 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 ;4,052 .75 201 142 19 0.49 1.150 0.000 0.56 54,317 .06 201 142 20 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4 ,052 .75 201 142 21 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052 .75 201 142 22 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052 .75 201 142 23 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052 .75 201 142 24 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 54,140 .P,6 201 142 25 O.A6 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,OS2 .75 201 142 26 0.45 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052 .75 201 142 ?7 0.46 1,150 0.000 0.53 54,052 .75 201 142 2ft 0.45 1.150 0.000 0.52 53,964 .5,5 201 142 29 0.45 1.150 0.000 0.52 f3,964 .65 201 142 30 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052 .75 201 152 1 0.41 1.150 D.000 0.47 (3,612 .24 201 152 13 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052 .75 201 152 14 0.46 1.150 o.non O.S3 f4,1152 .75 201 152 16 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140 .66 201 152 17 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,14U .86 201 152 18 0.4E 1. 15 t1 0.000 0.53 f4,OS; .75 201 152 19 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052 .75 201 152 20 0.46 1.150 0.000 o.sa f4,J52 .75 RANCHO GUCAMONGA AO 81-2 EXN181i F PAGE 4 • A"P"N ASSE550RS ADJ GROSS ADJUSTMENT BOOK PAGE PAn DIA. ACRf.6 ACERAGE FOR R/W ADJ ACRES ASSESSMENT 201 152 21 O.q6 1,150 0.000 0.53 44,052.%$ 201 152 27 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 44,052.75 201 152 23 0.4F ~ 1.150 0.000 0.53 44,052.75 201 152 74 0.46 1.150 0.000 0,53 f~,052.75 201 152 ?5 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 54,140.86 201 152 26 0.4R 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,226.96 201 152 27 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052. 75 201 163 17 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 44,052. 75 201 163 18 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.7$ 201 163 19 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 173 1 0.50 1.150 0.000 0.58 (4,405.17 201 173 2 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 fa,228.96 201 173 3 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 44,140. 6~6 201 173 4 0.51 1.150 0.000 0.59 f4,49',. 27 201 173 $ 0.52 1.150 0.000 0.60 f4 ,.SR 1.37 201 173 6 0.52 1.150 0.000 0.60 44.581.37 201 173 7 0.49 1.150 0.000 0,56 54,317.06 201 173 ft 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140,66 201 173 9 0.47 1.1$0 0.000 0.54 44,140.88 • 201 173 10 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052. 75 201 173 11 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 173 12 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 54,226.:36 201 173 13 22.36 1.000 0.000 22.38 f171,456.75 201 422 1 0.64 1.150 0.000 0.97 47,400. R8 201 422 2 O.A6 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 422 3 0.44 1.150 0.000 0.51 f3,R76.55 201 422 4 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052. 75 201 422 5 0.45 1.150 0.000 0.52 f3,9f++4.65 201 422 6 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.R6 201 422 7 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 422 6 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052. 7.5 201 422 9 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,05?, 75 201 422 10 0.45 1.1,50 0.000 0.52 (3,964,65 201 422 11 0.51 1.150 0.000 0.59 44,493.27 201 422 12 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 44,228.36 201 422 tR 0.46 1,150 0.000 0.53 sq,p52. 75 201 472 14 0.45 1.150 0.000 0.52 43,964.65 201 422 15 0.50 1.150 0.000 0.56 44,405, 17 201 422 16 D.55 1.150 0.000 0.63 f4,R45. 68 201 444 1 0.46 1,150 0.000 0,5,5 f4,226. 96 201 444 2 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,2?6.9R 201 444 3 0.47 1150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.R6 201 444 1 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.A9 201 444 5 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,1411. R6 201 444 6 0.47 1,150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140. 66 201 444 7 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.56 f4,226.96 701 4A4 6 0. 4A 1.150 0.000 0,56 f4,317.06 201 144 9 0.49 1.150 0.000 O.Sfi (4,917, OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-2 n lJ EXHIBIT F PAGE 5 A-P-N ASSESSORS AUJ GROSS ADJUSTMENT BOOK PAGE PAR DIA. ACRES ACERAGE FOR R/W AOJ ACRES ASSESSMENT 201 444 10 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,22d .'36 201 444 11 0.46 1.150 o.non 0.55 f4,2?d.96 201 444 12 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.46 201 444 13 0.47 1.1.50 0.000 0.54 f4,140.d6 201 444 14 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 54,140.4E 201 444 15 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.A6 201 452 1 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,0,52.75 201 452 2 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 452 3 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.?~ 201 452 4 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,0.52.75 201 452 5 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 452 F 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.dE 701 452 7 0.4E 1.150 0.000 0.55 (4,224.96 201 452 d 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,22R.96 201 452 9 0.4E 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 452 10 0.46 1.150 0.000 O.S3 (4,052.75 201 452 11 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 452 12 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 452 13 0.46 1. 15G 0,000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 452 14 0.46 1.1,50 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 . 201 452 15 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.5,5 (4,224.96 201 452 16 0.4E 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 452 17 0.4E 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 2.01 452 1F 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 ;4,140.dF 201 452 19 0.47 1. 15U 0.000 0.54 f4,140.R6 201 452 20 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 452 21 0.65 1.150 0.000 0.75 f5,72F.72 201 452 27 O.F3 1.150 0.000 0.72 f5,550.51 201 452 23 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 452 24 0.46 1.160 0.000 0,53 (4,052.75 201 457 25 0.52 1.150 0.000 0.60 (4,581.37 201 452 26 0.64 1.150 0.000 0.74 f5,638.61 201 452 27 0.52 1.150 0.000 0.60 54,581.37 201 452 26 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 452 29 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 457 30 0.4E 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 452 31 0.5? 1.160 o.non 0.60 f4,501.37 201 452 3? O.F3 1.150 0.000 0.72 f5 „550.51 201 452 33 0.46 1.150 0,000 0.55 f4,228.9fi 201 452 34 0.50 1.150 0.000 O.Sd (4,405.17 201 4fi3 1 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.9F, 201 463 2 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,22R,06 201 4F3 3 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.dF 201 463 4 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 463 5 0.47 1.160 0.000 0.54 f4,1A0.06 201 4F3 F O.A6 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4.052.75 201 463 7 0.46 1.160 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 4fi3 8 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.dF 201 463 9 O. 4F 1.750 0.000 0.53 (4,062.75 201 4fi3 10 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.66 RANCHO CUCAMONGA AO B4-2 • EXHIBIT F PAGE 6 A-P-N ASSESSORS AD.1 GRO55 ADJUSTMENT ROOK PAGE PAR DIA. ACRES ACERAGF FOR R/W ADJ ACRES ASSESSMENT 201 4F3 11 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 ;4,2?.0.96 201 463 12 1.00 1.150 0.000 1.15 fft,010.33 201 463 13 0.ft7 ~ 1.150 0.000 1.00 f7,AA4.94 201 463 14 0.7A 1.150 0.000 0.90 f6,072.Ofi 201 463 15 0.69 1.150 0.000 0.79 fe.,079. 13 207 463 16 1.90 1.150 0.000 2.28 f17,444.46 201 921 5 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 ;4,140.06 201 921 6 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.Rfi 201 921 7 D.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.P~6 201 921 B 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 ;4,140.A6 201 921 9 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 150.A6 201 921 10 C.47 1.150 0.000 0,54 ;4,140.06 201 971 11 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 (4,140.66 201 921 12 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.A6 201 921 13 0.47 7.150 0.000 0.54 f4, i40.A6 201 921 14 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 14U.R6 201 921 15 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.A6 201 921 16 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 24,140.06 201 921 17 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.6 201 921 1ft 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 24,140. A•6 • 201 971 19 0.47 1.150 O.D00 0.54 f4,140.P•6 201 921 20 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.66 201 921 21 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 ;4,140.66 201 921 22 0,47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,14U.06 207 921 23 0.47 1.150 0,000 0.54 24,140.06 201 921 24 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 ;4, 140, P,6 ?01 921 25 0.47 1. 15D 0.000 0.54 24,140.86 201 971 9 0.48 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,^.26,86 201 971 /0 0.49 1.150 0.000 0.56 24,317.06 201 971 11 0.49 1.150 0.000 0.56 24,317.06 201 977 12 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 ;4,052.75 201 971 13 O.4fi 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 971 14 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 24,052.74 201 971 15 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 24,052.75 201 971 16 0.47 1.150 0,000 0.54 f4, 140.06 201 971 17 0.47 1.150 0.000 ~ 0.54 (4,140.66 201 971 to 0,47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.AF 201 971 19 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 971 20 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 ;4,140.A6 201 981 29 0.4ft 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,22R .:a6 201 9A1 30 0.46 1.160 0.000 0.,53 ;4,052.7.5 201 9R1 31 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,140.0fi 201 901 32 0,47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4,t40.R6 201 9A1 33 0.40 1.150 0,000 0.55 f4,22R,9F 201 901 34 0,40 1.150 0.000 0.55 f4,27R.86 201 9R1 ?5 0.49 1.150 0.000 0,56 f4,317.U6 201 9P1 ,16 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.Rfi 201 9R1 37 0,4R 1.150 0.000 0.53 24,052.75 201 9A1 aft 0.47 1.150 0.000 0.54 f4, 140.Bfi RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 64-2 • EXHIBIT F PAGE 7 A-P-N ASSESSORS ADJ GROSS ADJUSTMENT BOOK PAGE PAR DIA. ACRES ACERAGE FOR R/W ADJ ACRES ASSESSMENT 201 9R1 39 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 54,052.75 201 961 40 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,057.75 201 961 41 0-46 - 1.150 0.000 0.53 ;4,n52.75 201 961 42 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 061 43 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 201 901 12 0.46 1.150 0.00 0.53 201 901 10 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 (4,052.75 201 991 11 0.46 1.150 0.000 0,53 (4,052.75 201 991 12 0.45 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,OS2.75 201 991 13 0.46 1.150 0.000 0.53 f4,052.75 1061 571 4 5.00 1.000 0.000 5.00 536,305.60 • • n RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-2 ASSESSORS TRACT l0T DIA. ACRES 10046 1 0.47 tOn46 2 0.47 1004E 3 0.4E 10046 4 0.4E 10046 5 0.4E 10046 F 0.46 10046 7 0.4E 1004E A O.4F 10046 9 0.46 10046 10 0.47 1004E 11 0.4E 10045 12 0.46 1004E 13 0.46 1004fi 14 0.46 10046 15 0.46 10046 1F 0.47 1004E 17 0.46 10046 to 0.46 1004E 19 O. 4F 1n046 20 U.4A 1004E 21 0.47 10045 27 O.d7 1004E 23 0.47 10046 24 O,4B 1004E 25 0.49 7004E 2F 11.47 t004~ 77 0.41 10047 1 0.72 10D47 7 0.49 10047 3 0.50 10047 4 0.49 10047 5 0.60 10047 F 0.4A 10047 7 0.50 10047 A 0.47 10047 9 0.4F 10047 10 0.47 10047 11 0.47 10n47 12 0.47 10047 13 0.47 10047 14 0.47 10047 15 A.4A 10047 iF 0.47 10047 17 0.60 10047 19 0.40 10047 19 0.49 10047 70 O.4F 10047 21 0,4E 101147 2? 0.4E 10047 23 0.50 FXN161T F PAGE A AOJ GRASS ADJUSTMENT ACREAGE FOR R/W ADJ Af RFS ASSESSMENT 1$0 0 ,000 0 54 f4,123 .24 150 0 .000 0 .54 f4,132 .05 150 n ,000 0 .53 54,070 ,37 150 O .000I 0 .53 54,052 .1$ 150 0 ,000 0 .53 54,049 .94 1.50 0 .000 n .S3 34,049 .94 150 0 .000 0 .53 54,052 .75 150 0 .000 0 .53 34,052 .76 150 0 .000 0 .53 54,052 .7$ 150 0 .000 0 .53 f4,0P6 .91 160 0 .000 0 .53 ;4,0$2 .7$ 150 0 .000 0 .53 f4 ,Ob3 .44 150 0 .000 0 .53 f4,079 .19 150 0 .000 0 .53 34,052 .75 150 0 ,000 O .F9 54,070 .37 150 0 .000 0 .54 (4,132 .115 1S0 0 .000 0 .53 f4,070 .37 150 0 .000 0 .53 54,043 .94 150 0 ,000 0 ,59 f4 ,043 .94 150 0 .000 0 .55 64,194 .91 150 0 .000 0 .54 f4,132 .05 150 O .On0 0. 54 f4,149 .67 150 0 .000 0 .54 54,149 ,57 150 0 .000 0. 55 54,202 .53 150 0. 000 0. 56 t4 ,2A1 ,A2 150 n .nnn 0 .54 (4,123 .24 150 0. 000 0. 53 54,09G .A1 O .S7 150 0. 000 O. B3 56,325 .92 150 n. 000 0. 67 54,343 .49 150 0. 000 0. 57 54 3F9 .g3 150 n. ono 0. 56 54,2417 .63 150 0, 000 O. R9 f5,250 .96 150 0. 000 0. 55 f4,246 .5A 150 0. 000 0. 57 54,35x .93 150 n oon 0. 54 f4,1F7 ,29 150 0. 000 0. 53 (4,061 .56 150 0. 000 0. 54 f4,149 .67 150 0. 000 0. 54 f4,123 .24 150 0, 000 0, 54 f4,167 .29 150 n. DRn 0. 5q f4,105 .67 15n n. 000 n. 55 (4,176 ,10 15n 0, 000 CI. SF f4 ,255. 39 150 n. nnn 0, 54 34,14q. 67 150 O. t100 0. 57 ;4,396 .36 15n 0, 001;1 0, 56 f4,375, A7 150 O. OOn n, 57 (4,394. 68 150 0. 000 0. 53 (4,1170. 37 150 0. 000 0. 59 f4,Ofi 1. 56 15(1 U. On0 ~1. 6d f4 ,061, 5E 1511 O. OOh 0. 57 54,369. 93 RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-7 • EXHIBIT F PAGE 9 ASSESSORS ADJ GROSS ADJUSTMENT TRACT lOT DIA. ACRES ACREAGE FOR R/W ADJ AC RES ASSESSMENT 100x7 24 0.47 1.150 0,000 0 .54 f4, 1>;7.29 in047 2S 0.4E 1.150 0.000 11 ,53 f4,079.18 10047 2F 0.47 1.150 0.000 0 .54 t4, 132.05 101147 27 0.47 1.160 0,000 0 .54 54,114.43 10047 2R 0.4A 1.150 0.11110 11 ,55 34, 1ft4.?1 10047 79 O.fi9 1.150 0.000 O .PO 56,105.56 10047 30 O.SF 1.150 0.000 0 .64 f4,91F. 17 10047 31 0.50 1.150 0.000 0 .57 54,369.93 10047 32 0.50 1.150 0.000 0 .58 34,413.98 10047 33 0.51 1.150 0.000 0 .58 54,449.22 10047 34 0.58 1.150 0.000 O .F6 35,065,94 10047 35 0.58 1.1.50 0.000 O .F7 55,127,61 10047 36 0.48 1.150 0.000 0 .55 54,184.91 10047 37 0.46 1.150 0.000 0 .53 54,070.37 10047 RR 0.46 1.150 0.000 0 ,53 54,0170,37 10047 35 0.46 1.150 0.000 0 .53 f4,O70.37 10047 40 0.47 1.150 0.000 0 .54 54,167.29 10047 41 0.50 1.150 0.000 0 .57 S4,3fi 1. 1? 10047 42 0.51 1.150 0.000 0 .59 ;4,493.27 10047 43 0.53 1.150 0.000 0 .61 54,651.86 • 210.33 275 .62 1728512.00 • EXHIBIT f • RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-7 EXHIBIT G PAGE t ~J FXHi81T G LANGDON W. OWEN University of California, Berkeley Registration: California Mr. Owen has over 33 years of experience in (.lull and sanitary engineering, with primary emphasis on water resources systems planning, design, development and manaoement. He has aq eztensiva backq roand 'n the areas of groundwater Dasin management, wastewater renlamatinn ae av!ater desalination, water quality management, coastal Harriers *o prevent seawater intrusion, water supply systems, cenlunrtive use programs, malor water transfer facilities and water resources associated recreational development. Additional areas of Mr. Owen's ezpertiee include municipal financing agency requirements and procedures, insti nitlonal • relationships, expert testimony, and eronom~c evaluations. Specific experiences related to your proposal are includetl as an APDendix. Don Owen & Aseociatee, Inc. From 1973 to the present, Mr. Gwen has workeA ae a consulting engineer. His primary areas of involvement Include development of resources management programs, from inception to Implementation, for local, regional, State and Federal governmental agencies and entities in the private business sector. This activity in[ludes planning, assessment englneering, design, institutional relation r,hips and consulting on the implementation of pro lasts. Orange County Water Dlstrlct From 1965 to 1973, Mr. Owen served progressively as Dlstrlct Engineer, Assistant Manager, and Secretary-Manager of the platelet, Hls responslbllitles for the District, which pioneered numerous new approaches In the field of water menagrmrnt, ranged from supervision of all englnaen ng programs to overall manngement and adminletratlon of Uistrfct BCtIVItieB. Malor pro leers developed under his direction included a onmbined 15 MqD wastewater reclamation plant and S MGU desalination plant <n provide a water supply for a coastal anllnlty Intrusion barn er. Additional District programs Intludrd a gf 0110 dWBtef basin repleniohment program, Honln R ANI:~HI:I i'l1i: AA1UNtiA AD B~-2 EXHIBIT fi PAGE 2 operation studies, wastewater reclamation Investlga*ion, water eupDly quality management program, water rights litigation settlement, ano water facility oriented recreation programs. Mr. Owen developed and toortlinated a groundwater llaer pump tar and correlative basin equity program d?signed to equalize costs between groundwater uer and imported water supplies. He also negotiated solid waste disposal contracts as Dart of hia duties for the District. State of California Department of Water Resources From 1954 to 1965, Mr. Owen directed the Department's Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Studies Section. In this capa- city, he was responsible for the planning and imnlementatinn of a Delta water pro i;ct. As Chairman of the State-Federal Inter-Agency Delta Task Force, he directed the preparation of the molt,-million dollar Delta Pian. This included input from 3B local, State and Federal agenr.iee which hr coordinated. Mr. Owen also served on numerous [ommittees and task forces considering problems associated with the San ~loaquin Valley Drain; San Francisco Bay Area water programs; State Water Pro)ect contract negotiations; legal and . legislative matters; water quality and public Information programs. Prior to the above, Mr, Owen was responsible for the study, planning and design of alternative projects for the Delta portion of the State Water Project. Alternative pro trots Investigated were salinity control barrier plans in Ue San Francisco Bay System, Cross-Delta Waterway Control Plana, and a Delta Peripheral Canal. Considerations involved were wat r.r quality, wastewater disposal, master levee systems, tish and wildlife, vehicular transportation routing, agricultural and Industrial water supply systems and recreational facilities. Activities included feasibility studies, economi t. evaluations, project formulation, design, recommended project selection, report preparation and frequent public meetings and speeches. APPENIDX A Talbert Barrier (Orange County Water District) Mr. Owen completed the conceptual design, and as Manager of the Orange County Water District, supervised the construction of the talbrrt Barrier which is a seawater intrusion barrier eonetrur.ted in Orange County involving 17 multi-point In)ectlon wells and fi extraction wills. The barrier system Is designed to crests a groundwater mound and a pumping trough to rntablish a zero gradient and control the intrusion of ocrnn water Into the Orange County Groundwater Basin. The barrier ones, as a water supply, trritary treated water. Thp Project was completed in 1372 and has born In continuous oDeratlnn since that dat P., RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-2 • EXHIBIT (i PAGE 3 Alarm the Barrier (Orange County Water District-Los Angrlee County Flocd Control District) Mr. Owen served nn the Joint Management r'omml[tee and participated in the Conceptual design of the Alamitos Rarrlpr Project. This Pro7e<t is a combination of injection and extraction wells which control seawater intrusion into the northern edge of the Orange County Groundwater Basin and the Central Western Basins of Los Angeles County. The Project uses filtered Metropolitan Water District water as a water supply antl was ronstru<ted in 1969 antl has hero in coot inunus operation since that date. Santa Ana River Spreading Fau !!ties (Orange County Water District) Mr. Owen, ae Chiei Engineer for the Orange L'ounty Water District, designed and supervisetl construttinn of 400 acres of spreading facilities on the Santa Ana River capable n} percolating in excess of 200,000 acre feet of water annually. These facilities constructed between 19 F3 and 1973 have been in continuous operation. During the design and construttinn of these facilities, it was necessary to develop predictive methods of subsurf ar.e groundwater movements in order to protect the District from subsequent litigation, Roth hydrologic characteristics of the aquifer and water quality changes were a necessary part of the predictive tool. Treated Wastewater Percolation Ponds !City of Corona) Mr. Owen developed the conceptual design and supervised the final design of wastewater percolation ponds for the City of Corona. These facilities were constructed in 1978 and have been in continuous operation since that date. Northern Guam Lease (Guam Government) As a subcontractor to CDM Fnginrere, Mr. Owen performed consulting srrvrcea on the Northern Guam Lensr which dealt largely with the interface of seawater and fresh water aquifer Cmm~OaPd of coral shales on the northern halt of the island ni Guam. These studir^, contributed to a change in the prar.t~re of groundwater evtrart~on nn the Northern Le nae. Safety of future groundwater sunplirs were determined by the interface of salt and fresh water and the impact of extraction and/or eubsurf ace inflow in that equilibrium. The facilities recommended in the study are currently under cnnetructlon. MaPtel Lrvy System Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (State of Callinrnlal Retwoen 1953 and 1963, Mr. (Yuen nupervised the preparation of RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-2 EXHIBIT fi PAGE 4 conceptual plans for flood control and levy construction in Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. During this period of time, the mayor component of levy design dealt with the hydraulic characteristics of subsurface floods underlying the heavy organic soils of the Delta. Organic solid have the characteristics of undergoing extensive permeability changes with only slight loadings, Unloaded organic materials may have a Dermeabrlity in the range of course Band whsle eligntly loaded organic materials have permeability In the range of concrete. The analysis of pore pressure and levy stability during construction on organic soils require an extensive research into the nature of in-situ soil moisture changes while the soil mans undergoes loading conditions. Field tests of the research program were conducted between 1460 and 1963 and the•levy stability nn the test sections has been maintained since loaf time. The overall master levy system has never been implemented. Groundwater Management Plane !Various Cllente) General groundwater management plans which Involve the conceptual design of spreading facilities in the prediction • of groundwater movements have been completed for the following clients: 1. Big Bear Muninclpal Water DISt11ct 2. City of Corona 3. City of Santa 8arhara 4. Chino Basin Muninclpal Water District 5. Warren Basin/yucca Valley 6. The Irvine Company Lands (70,000 stress 7. Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District ~~ RANCHO CU(.AMONGA AD RI-2 • • EXHIBIT G PAGE S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 t4 15 16 Additional experiences which involve prediction of ground- water management are: CLIENT LOCATION PURPOSE Aliso Water Manage- SE Orange County Area-wide ment Agency Facilities Plan American National San Bernardino Wastewater Disposal Housing County Appiw Valley Ceunty San Bernardino Appraisal Water District County Consol~datetl Rock Co . SE Orange County Court Case Corp of Engineers Riverside County Recreational LA District Facilities Oaon Corporation Rtverside County Appraisal EPA Region 9 Globe, Arizona Wastewater D~epnsal Otis Heald Northern San Diego County Court Case Hi-Desert founty San Bernardino Groundwater Water District County Adjudication IntroTech (Italy) Poe River Valley Water Supply Study Irvine Ranch Water Orange County Water Supply System District City of Rialto San Rernardino Wastewater Disposal County Riverla General San Bernardino General Plan County (9eaumont) Amendment Sunkist Growera Riverside. County Appraisal (Corona) State of Calltornia Niles Cone Alameda Water Supply Study County Yucaipa County Water San Bernardino Sewage Plant Project District County • RANCHO CUCAMONfA AD 84-2 n LJ MUNICIPAL FINANCING (VARIOUS CLIENTS) EXF1181T r, pq ,E 6 Mr. Owen has actetl as Financial Planner Aasessmen? Englneer or Financial Advisor to the following: 1. Orange County Water District IDiatrict Flnancingl 2. The Irvine Company (Municipal Financing) 3. Big Bear Municipal Water District (Lake Acquisition) 4. Big Bear Municipal Water District (Assessment Englneer) 5. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District 6. City of Rancho Qicamonoa 7. County of San Bernardino 8. County of Santa Barhar2 9. County of San Diego • 10. Ramono Municipal Water Distrlet 11. City of Rialto 12. Sunkist 13. Moble Land Development Company 14. Taubman Corporation 15, City of Torrance 16. Ailso Water Management Agency 17. Apple Valley County Water Agency 1R. Valley Center Municipal Water District 1'd. Fnmona Valtey Municipal Water District • NAIJI:HU ('.UCAMON ,A AD 84-2 EXPERT WITNESS (VARIOUS CI.IENTS> EXHIBIT , PAGE y Mr. Owen has served as an expert witness nntl advisor in legal actions ~n the fnllew~ng matters: 1. OCWD vs. Chino Santa Ana River Ad~udlcation 7. Delta Water rights hearing (State Water Resources Control Boardl ?. City of Placentia Land Condemnation 4. Ptie Heald vs. Cal Trans (Water rights appraisals .. Summit Ranch Bankruptcy (Water rights appraisals 8. Warren Basso Grountl Water Ad~udscation 7. Big Bear Lake Acquisition 8. Mallard Slough EIR Suit • 9. City of Rialtp Assessment District 1D. Csty nt Irvsne vs. IRWD (One man one vote <hallengel 1i. Santa Ynez River Water f'onservatlon District ID 1 :~ • EXHIpIT H • RANCHO CUCAMONGA AD 84-r. • E XHIPIT G EXf11R1T H PAGF. 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATE STATE OF ('AL IFORNIA COUNTY DF SAN RERNARDIND CITY (1F RANCHO CUCAMONGA The und~rreigned. LLOYD HU9RS, hereby CERTIFIES UNDER PENAI_7Y OF PERJURY that the following ~e all true and correct. That th?ra have new been instit~atetl pro<eed~nys under +h? provisions of the "MUnicloal Imorovemnnt Art of 1313", 'o?ing Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the Sta-? of California, for the cons t.nction of certain ouDlie Improvements in a special assessment disc n ct known and designateA as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ND, 94-2 fAl-TA LgMA FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL) (hereinafter referred to ae the "Assessment Dlstrltt"). • THE UNDERSIGNED STATES AND CERTIFIES AS FOLLDWS: (check one> ( ) a. That all easements, rights-of-way, or lantl necessary for the accomplishment of the works of imorov?meet for the above referenced Assessment Oistrirt have been obtained and are in the possession of the City. (}~) b. That all easements, rights-of -way or IanA necessary for the accomplishment of the works of improvement for fhe above referenced Assessment District have Deen obtained and are in the poesy-esion of the City, except for those attachetl hereto, showing I?gal ~ description anA maps of rights-of-way and easements not yet obtained at this time. It Ie further acknowledged that works of improvement ae proposed to be construr CeA within saiA Assessment District must be constructed within puDllt rlohts-of-way, land, or easements as owned by said Clty at the time of the construe lion of the works of Improvement, and the undersigned hereby further certif ins tha+ all righ4 s-~f-way n?:essary ipr the works of Improvement will he oDtalned and in the possession of the G ty pn nr to the commencement of any cnnstructlon, EXFf.UTED thin R day of February, 7395, at Rant hn Cucamonga, Callfornla. LLOYD HURRS RANCHO Cl)f.AMON9A AD B4-? E)[H191T H PACE 2 __ /4 CITY RANCHO CNCAMONGA STAT OF CALIFORNIA • ~,.>,~, PROPOSED BOUND. ALTA LO MA C HAN ASSESSMENT DISTRIC ,. N va on x ~i w~~ ,. ~ .ii Nt I: u za nx m to b~ m •I bf ml ~ ax a m ~n to I ~ L r ~a i0 SCALE:- 1"=400' %1 ) v l ~>..,1 i n ' `i ~ , _ Qa ` y... . ;n ~ J n u ,. u u to Q le u ,~ ~~ 1. n va ~ 4 Q T u u a I 1 ~~ „ m la ~T ~~ D . ? i ~ HyP ]% 1N is s u~ REFERENCE NOTE A'. THE LINES AND DIM_ AND DETAILED DESG, ON FILE AS OF JAN1_ 10046 AND TRACT t A8 201 444 BQ, JSED BOUl~TDARIES, LOl~IA CRANI~TEL :~IENT DISTRICT 84- ~ xm an a xm an N zm xm w w a m zm m ux n v xor ~ ba ui ro e ~' ra l bi bx i a 1m ]m eT I eb zo e xm on e 1m mr u 7a l m N1 W 1s w 1m m~ zm ue "iII v ao _1 Q m n u zm I xm ~ ea en bx a re m n w im vm iv zm . 1x y, zn '~ vm m zm m ~~ ':. ' bx ° bx v ~n e xm iu ~ ~~~~~. zm a0 m /` xm ~ w eex m zm ° za xvl \ "a b1 T pr'-1{ en b[ \ 1e YI IDI p ` ti ee ~ 1 ~ in 1 exa 1 /i111 uz xa e S e AND PARCELS SH O'J;N AND REFEREF;CEU ALL LOTS PIECES ,m p, a " m , , TO THE ASSESSORS MAP ARE WITHIN THE DISTR'~~CT i ^' TEMPORARY NUMBERS FOR TRACTS 10046 & 10047 ARE n REFERENCED TO THE FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP FILED ~, e a AUGUST 17 1984 AND CERTIFIED BY THE CITY CF RANCHO im CUCAMONGA.ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS VrILL BE PHOVIOED ~e m WHEN ASSIGNED BY THE ASSESSOR. SEE REPORT FOR m REFERENCE BETYIEEN ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS AND ' u TEMPORARY NUMBERS am axe ~ LEGEND >a w CENTER LINE EXISTING STREETS ----------~~-°-°-°-~~-°-~~- vr w a PROJECT FACILITIES PROPERTY SOUPJCARY -- DISTRICT BOUNDARY :.....::~.::::~:..: ~ :::::.:::.::.:::::..~:,,: ~. REFERENCE NOTE AND SYMBOLS ' THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF ANY PARCEL OF LAND, !.U1 Y, FOR A FULL AND DETAILED DESCRIPTION THEREOF BE FOUND IPJ 'HE ASSESSORS MAP ON FILE AS OF JANUARY 1 1985 OR IN THE FINAL TRACT MAPS FOR TRACT 10046 AND TRACT 10047 AS FILED WITH THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM ONCA ASSESSORS MAP FINAL TRACT MAPS 201 444 BOOK NUMBER 27 -LOT NUMBER TRAC '.' - " 'n!LLS'rDE KOAD I i, i .. i ~~~-~. ........~. ° ' L I r n. E ~ ~/ I 1 ~ F~, ~ ~_ C ;. I ~. 1~7~ REFERENCE NOTE AND SYM` THE LINES AND D161ENSIONS AND DETAILED DESCRIPTION ON FILE AS OF JANUARY 1 10046 AND TRACT 10047 A ASSESSORS 201 aaa_ I BOOK NUMF PAGE NUME PARCEL NU )~1=~" j w y ~~~~i FILED IN Tlic OFFICE OF Tli /~ yy THIS 6th DAY OF FEBRUA. i ;; ~ ,~ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY 0 , ~ b rr ~ I I b , _ _ w ' TFiE AP HEREIN, SNOWING ~ ~ - -- ~-~--- - . . i ~ ~ ~ DISTP.ICT, YJAS APPROVED B . ~L _:__I~ ~ ~ ~ CUCA~40;dGA BY RESOLUTIOt -----__ -. b ., ~ ~ i FEERUA,RY 1985 ~ ~Iv~ ~ - CITY CLERK OF THE CITY O. I i - ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. .; FILED THIS DAY OF 1' I IN BOOK OF MAPS OF A I ~ CCUtJTY FECORDER, OF THE ~ CCUNTY RECORDER OF 7HE ~,~ m in rn on u a fm In xn xn m In n+ cn M 10 11 11 ]01 m la CONNECT TO EXISTING ALTA LOMA BASIN REFERENCE NOTE AND 51M B0'~_S THE LItJES AND DIt.fENSI0N5 OF ANi !';.RCEL O'r .,, ~Cr A FUt.. e~f ANU DETAILED DESCSIPTION THEREOF BE f*C.. t.D ~" '~~' ~ ~~ °O~''"~ !"' ON FILE AS OF JANUARY 1 1985 OR ! , Th~E Fehr'^.. ~~2A~ ~ ^'S F:'4 fHACT 10046 AND TRACT 10047 AS FILED WITH THE CIT1 C'r' f2:.d C'r •,0 CU CA!.IONGA ASSESSORS fd AP Flf: i.'. 'i2;.Cl C.ArS 201 ~~'-, 444 BOOK NUMBER /`-~_ ~i OT ~. J'1BER TRACT 1C046 12 PAGE NUMBER ~~~_.--~0' r, l~f.INER TRACT tC0.7 PARCEL NU~!BER ~./ FILED RJ TI1E OFFICE OF TfIE CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCfiO CUCAMONGA THIS 6th DAY OF FEBRUARY 1985 CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO^:GA I, TF1F FGFP HEREIN, SHONIING THE BG'J"JUARIES 0= THE PRO?OSED ASSESS';.ENT 11 DISTRiCi, 5VA5 APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 0~ THE CITY OF RA^:CHO ~~,~, ~ CU CA!A O,JGA BY RESOLUTION NO 85-38, ADO?TED ON THE 6th DAY CF ,~' „ ~, FEBRUARY 1985 CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FILED THIS DAY OF 1945. AT THE FiOU.R OF O~G~OCK b! IN BOCK OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS IN THE OFFICE OF THE CCUNTY RECORDER, OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR COUNTY RECORDER '~sIN ^