The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985/02/20 - Agenda Packet~p G~CASfO G~(` 1 ~'1 ©N ~ ~ t_ O l~`, l~l l`r I'l~.A~JIJ • rl-1L ~ U ~ L~1~ ]~ \ l~ 1977 Lioos Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cu camorga, California Februarv 20, 1985 - 7:30 o.m. All iteo ~obutted for the Ci tT Comeil Agenda ~u~t be in ~rifiog. She deadlive for sub~i[ting these iteo i• 5:00 p.~. on the NednodaT prior to the meeting. The Ciq Clerk'• Office recei~e• ill such items. 1. CALL SO Oi116R A. Pledge of Allegiance [o Flag. B, Roll Call: Nright _, euque[ _, Nike le Dahl _, and King C. Approval of Minutes: .]anon zy 30, 1985 2. ANI101111C~T3/PYSSWISATIONS A. Tbursday, February 21, 1985, 7:30 p.m. - PARK DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Liona Park Communi [y Center. B. Ge dne eday, February 27, 1985, 7:00 p.m. -PLANNING COMMISSION, Liona Park Community Center. C. Thursday, Pebruazy 28, 1985, 7:J0 p.m. -ADVISORY COMMISSION, Library Conf erente Rom. D. Va ca nciea on Mis[oric Preservation Commission and Park Development Comm iesion. Applicatiane being accepted through March 14, 1985. Contact City Clerk for more information, City Council Agenda -2- Pebruary 20, 1985 3. C~SE11'T rat*anao • The folloning Cotuent Calendar iteau are e=pected to 6e roa[iae and non-contrmeraial. Shed trill be acted upon 67 the Co®cil at one tine ~ithont diacnuion. A. Approval of Warrants, Register No'e. 8$-02-20 and i Payroll ending 2-3-85 Eor the total amount of 5326,051 .70. e. Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AB 85-02 for On-Sale 8 Beer d Hide Eating Place License, Donna H. Kolb and Leonard D. Rolb, 6614 Carnelian. C. £orvard Claim (CL 85-03) aga in et Che Ci [y by Se ldon George Nall, per eonal injuries on Sanuary 21, 1985, on Foothill Boulevard in fion[ of Pines Trailer Cour [. D. Forvard Claim (CL 85-04) aga inet the City by Manuel A. IO Sanchez, auto accident on November 11, 1984, on Highland Avenue. E. Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract end Lien 11 Agreement, submitted by Genet/ ieve Ives for property to ca [ed ac 18020 Chervil S[r set. RESOLOTION 85-46 ~5 . A RE$OLL'TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C:?Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND L:EN AGREEMENT FROM GENEVIEVE IVES AND AUTHORIZ :SG THE NAYOR AND CITY CLERR TO SIGN SAME F. Approval of 8onda, Improvement Agreement and Drainage (F Reimbursement Agreement for Tract 9441 and Tract 1L609, located south of Mile on Avenue, ve et of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Crismar Development and release of Bonds, Impr ov amen[ Agreement and Reimbursement Agreement for Tract 9441 and Tract 11ti 09, submitted by Nubank. Release: Faithful Performance Bonds Phase I 5141,700 Phaee II $148,200 Phaee III 5252,400 Phaee IV S 90,200 Phase V 5650,600 Labor b Material Bonds Phaee I S 70,850 Phaee II S 74,100 Phaee III 5126,200 Phaee IV S 45,100 V $325 100 Ph aee , City Council Agenda -3- Pebruary 20, 1985 Accept: Faithful Pe rformence Hoads • Phase I $141,700 Phase II 5148,200 Phase III $252,400 Phaae IV S 90,200 Yhaee V $650,600 Accep[: Laboz S Na serial Bonds Phase I $ 70,850 Phase II $ 74,100 Phase III 5126,200 Phase IV S 45,100 Phase V $325,300 RESOLUTION N0, 85-47 33 A RESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AG REENENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 9441 AND TRACT 11609 RESOLUTION N0. 85-48 34 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY CODNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A RETHBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FROM CRISMAR • DEVELOPMENT FOR TRACT 9441 AND TRACT 11609 G. Approval of Honds and Agreement for DR 84-18, ;o ca tad 35 an she east aide of Archibald Avenue, south aide of 7[h SCreeC, submitted by Mar[in Jaeka. RESOLUTION N0. 85-49 +~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-18 H, Approval of Subordi na Cion Agreement, submitted by +I William and Dona Hezneb For [heir props rcy located at 12715 3uawit Avenue RE80LUTION N0. 85-50 ~1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT PRON WILLIAM AND DOHA BARNES AND AUTNORIZ ING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEAR TO SIGN SAME City Council Agenda -4- February 20, 1985 I. Release of Honda: :5 • TRACT 12184 - Located south of 8e ae Line and east of Beryl; aver, Tow d Country Development. Release: Monument Bond (Ca eh Deposit) $2,800.00 12919 SU!4fIT AVENUE - Owner; Richard T. and Carol Ftevch. Release: Labor and Material Bond $4,250,00 d, Approval of authorization [o Ivv its Hida For [he :6 Amethyst Avenue Sidewalk from 8aee Line Road to Nonce Vista Street Improvement Proj ec[. K. Approval of Award of Contract for Design Services for ~~ Che wideving and reconstruction of the west aide of Turver Avenue (Block Grant Project) [o Norris-Repke, Inc. for the amount of $8,100.00. L. Approval of additional Appropria [ions for Contract 55 Cavti ngency in Building S Safety Department regarding Plan Check Se rv icee. M. Approval of auc horizetion of Che tranef er of a portion 5% of the expected 1985 Mortgage Bond Allocation in an • amount not to exceed $6,000,000 [o Che Ci[y c: Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. RESOLUTION N0. 85-51 5A A ftES OLUTION OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TRANSFERRING A PORTION OF THE ALLOCATION OF MORTGAGE SUBSIDY BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO ERCEED 56,000,000 TO THE CITY OF RANCHO GllCAMONCA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY N. Approval of Resolution supporting [he amendment of h9 Iosurence Code Section 533, Evidence Code Section 352 and Cover®ent Code Sections 825 and 990 ae Chey concern Punitive Damages. RESOLUTION N0. 85-52 i3 A RES OLLT ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, G LIFORN LA, SllPPORTING AND RECOMMENDING THE AMENDMENT OF INSURANCE CODE SECTION 533, EVIDENCE CODE SECTION 352 AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 825 ANO 990 AS TREY CONCERN PUNITIVE DAMAGES City Council Agenda -5- February 20, 1985 0. Approval of procedure for receiving and distributing %9 • administrative and compliance fees for private activity bonds. RESOLUTION N0. 85-53 %° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN CNO CDCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR RECEIP INC AND TRANSFERRING 80ND ISSUE ADMINISTRATIVE AND COMPLIANCE FEES BETWEEN FUNDS P. Approval to accept the offer from Alta Loma School 80 District to sell 2.3 scree adjacent to Rermosa Park. Q. Approval of an aetabliehment of a Formal Investment ,43 Polity fo r the City. R. Approval of Underwriter"e Agreement Far Day Creek A5 Community Fe cilitiea District, Mello Roos Ac[. S. Approval of Agreement for Finao<ial Consultant Services 90 for Day Creek Community Facil iti ea District, Hello Roos. T. Approval of recommendation by [he City Council Park 9i pcquisi ti on Cov®ittee to decline offer of land • dedication in-lieu of perk dedication fees f~r Tract No. 12902, a project by Woodland Pacific Corpo r;ti on. b. ADP6RTTBEC PDbLIC BEdRIlIC3 A. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - CARYN - A Development Agreement 6e tween [he City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca ryn Development Company, Kaufman and Broad Land Company, and Marlborough Development Corporation relative [o properties located be [weep the eztenai on of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and between the extension of Ro<heeter and Milliken Avenues on the ee et and west - APN 335-141 -08, end 12-19, 225-151-01 through 03, 07, 08, 10-13. Item continued from February 6, 1985 meeting. ORDINANCE N0. 248 (second reading) 98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RAN CEO CUCAMONGA, CARYN DEVELOPMDNT COMPANY, RAUFMAN AND BROAD LAND COMPANY, AND MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, IN RELATION TO TAE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN TEIE ERTEN 5ION OF City Council Agenda -b- Pebrua ry 20, 1985 BANYAN AVENUE ANO THE PROPOSED POOTA ILL • FREEIiAY ON THE NOETH AND SOUTH, AND BETNEIN THE ESIENSION OE ROCHESTER AND MILLIREN AVffi70E5 ON TEE EAST AND NEST - APN 335-141-08, AND 12-19, 225-151-O1 THROOGH 03, 07, 08, 10-13 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT_AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN ;lo AMENDMENT 84-02 - HAVEN AVENOUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - Amendmen[ of Part III of [he Industrial Area Specific Pla¢ [o establish a Maven Avenue Overlay Dis[r ic[, located on both aides of Bev en Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and 4th S[ree[. Item Conti ~Ued ftom February b, 1985 meeti¢g. ORDINANCE N0. 249 (firs[ reading) 1'i AN ORDINANCE OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84-02 AMENDING PART III OF TAE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISA A RAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT LOCATED ON BOTH SIDEB OF RAVEN AVENUE BETIiEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 4TE STREET C, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT • AMENDMENT 84-04 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A Development District Amendment free OP (Office /Pr of eesiona l) to ISP (Industrial Specix :o Plan) for approximate lv 40 acres of land located on :he west side of Haven Avenue, in oonj un coon with t.~ Haven Avenue Ovrr fay District - AFN 208-331-01, 12, :3 and ZO8-341 -01. Item continued from February 6, 1985 mee [i ng. ORDINANCE N0. 250 (second reading) 14Sa AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84-04 - MAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A CHANGE IN THE DIBTA ICT DESIGNATION PROM OP TO ISP AND MH FOR APPRORIHATELY 40 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OP HAVEN AVENUE BETNEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARRON HIGHNAY - APN 208-J31-O1, l2, 13 and 208-341-01 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - An amendment to Che Induetr iel Specific Plan to expand the boundary of Subarea 7 (IDduatrial Perk category) to City Council Agende -7- February 20, 1985 iaclude epprozimate ly 40 acres of land located on the vest ei de of Haven Avenue, be tveen Foothill Eoulevard and Azror High ray, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlny District - APN 208-331-01, 12, 13 and 208-314-01. Item continued from February 6, 1985 mee [iag. ORDINANCE N0. 25i (second zeadi ng) '.-=6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CL'CAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DIB TRICT - ERPANDING THE BOUNDARY OF SOHAAEA 7 (INDUSTRIAL PARR CATEGORY) TO IN CL ODE APPROAIHATELY 40 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OP RAVEN AVENUE, BETNEEN FOOTRILL BOOLEVAAD AND ARROW RIGHNAY - APN 208-331-01, 12, 13 AND 208-314-01 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1+> 8585=02 - Ao Amendment to the Public Health end Sefety Element to provide consistency vith Slate Lav pr ov inione of the Alquiet-Priolo Ac[, ae amended. RESOLUTION N0. 85-54 i6~ A AESOLOTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY • OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROV :HG GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PS-02, AMENDING :'HE PUBLIC HEALTf7 AND SAFETY ELEMENT OF SHE RANCHO CUCAHONGA GENERAL PLAN F. REPROGRAMMING OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT l5fi FUN DE - A request Co reprogram Community Development Block Graot Funds Erom [he 1984/85 Contingency Fund to the Sha-ed Housing for Seniors Program. RESOLLTION N0. 85-55 15i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF RANCHO COCANONGA, CALIPORNIA, REPROGRAMMING FUNDS FROM THE 1984-85 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 5. 110!-ADV817ISED H6AiI11G8 No Items Submitted City Council Agenda -S- February 20, 1985 6. CITY MAt6CB!'S S'LPP HHPORY9 A. REDDEST POR AiJ'THORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACT WITR V l6g L SYSTBNS. INC. POR NAPPING PROSECT - A request for authorization co ¢egotiate a contract with V L Systems for preparation of computer-based data system for production of atlas ma pa for [he City and adjacent areas, B. ANNERATION N0. 1 - ANNEXATION OF APPRORIMATELY 24H '_09 ACRES BOUNDED BY HIGBLAND AVENUE AND THE ERTENSIONS OF HILL IXEN. BANYAN AND ROCNE STER AVENUES (CARYN) RESOLDTION N0. BS-56 C11 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNERATION OF TERRITORY GENE!(AI.LY LOCATED BETWEEN THE ERTEN SION OP BANYAN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ON TAE NORTH AND SOUTTi AND BETWEEN THE ERTENSIONS OF ROCRESTER AV EN OE AND MILLIREN AVENIIE ON THE EAST AND WEST (ANNEXATION N0. ll 7. COUpCIL BOSI1B33 . A. CONSIDERATION OF NATTER TO FILL VACANCY ON THE ''-~a ADVISORY COMMISSION POR ALTA LONA COMMUNITY 8. AD.IOORL®IT 1 i rvU O O r 1-vJ G.OUN1'I~Omrm G,.~OG 6.J oOJmO • rU o O m u mVU OrOrlo-~OrTJJ C. .000OV VU•mrm F- ^ L 1 Or T V W rYtJ u\r,Orv S.l .ll .yh CI C.J UJU JNr wrv 11 Om G O 1" Nr:V Ty\U)r^u\1-PY\fVNN'Y (VOL, fV^TLL\P • I PM1' G ~V ^ (a V.~r TU`n. I- ^LL~ ^.+r u\9 U ~ i 1 1 - I 1 I • - - ^ < lY N N T r•I r N 4 f I I = 1 1 q 1 L ~[I mlJ'N I'1F m^ N(~^..Y .'~rU\~uhw O-V^N~•,r ~.Ct W1~u~.T ~. ^f~Tr.\wF WPU~. O K 1 V r U O F M1 1'1 Ih ~ .U W `O v W `• `• L F h F I^ F h h h h M1 .1. W yi W M QI W W w 14 P U` £ '1' I NNI• '.TV ru\ I~y .. u\Y~J\LL.u ~ U\ILt LL, n.u Y\LL... DUI U\i[ ul \V\n\'+ < ¢ 1 ~ H ~ ^ ~ ti ^ ~ ~ u S I Uv \. O J C% L„~rJ vvUL, Hv':. ... vu~vn Jt. .J _ .~..oJ ~ I u I , LL o i O Y r P m i i ) a i S 1 W .eU W ryuAw V I d H I w H C K c m :: I Y ur Z 1 Y i • LL W ~ F t~ r Z N W 1 >_ ,p ~ 1 N W S ~1 = »~L W ~Jr w> I ¢~ r-•- ~~ •- . J ly t YrJ rJ ;, bi (J< ,n 'n In ZLL+4 ~InWt rvwN uE ~ I. JL ZGl9 C Wt1 J C1 Y ~Y W h J w J J •-. I-i •+ L U P it H ,-0£ .J £ O~-UC', LL LL Y LU Y.1mL ZLL 2 ' t i r J C L J L C .D .Y LL • I f1 J L! l'J'[J ¢u,w .Lw wJ IY ~. i •- C. .J n[L .-~q .O Y Y Y Y`~'~ nJ/•LLr VI LL '7 L N l I q J al N N .~ /, N Y 2 1 2r ."' q a 4 I Itp w~uW .9mi LirE JZ L~. CJ I 42 , > L H LO(Y LLJiw W 1 £: £ Z SLL4 w I •-1 S +~ J Y ~_ '-uq J it, £ JU U0 CC,J ~J D i • I ^ I < J Z L .uU 'r Lr ¢.Lw LL.UU V i UUJ p l JY q 4 v~ ^ u u L ~J 4 L t] w .+ .>_ -1 r+ u' J j Q £1.1 /. >.L ~u /ILLr ^rU U"~:l l7J I I Sw L -I v\ .JY ., wt1 a ;J ~(Lwwq 'I ¢q Z Zy~1 1 L W ~ J q ¢ )Y ~ • . -I 44 JHW•"Y.-I r~•~-. •n J Y) I 2J ~J • NI J•`. ' ) 1 : >J-.1 \ ' •L 5I¢ TV1J Y:>'L JUZZL LL J .w r~ G Z c Y. L W Y ]: - Y S^< d (L •'+ Y ti I Y ~ .[ 1 S n R C • , . u ¢u. -•Llt '~ ^LL wu,G.i IL444^ lLLK I Ww Q .. ~i JG,:w .~lw.Y .u Jq 9L~U~y )J 1LL ' N .a L U ~Y Y + C - 11 U .L LI C . 1 .. J .J) UI `r ,/• .7 C.1 (L LL .L 'S LL J IJ I I • '+y~ ~ _ r I ~• IA d ~ K . I ~ Z W " I w G J • W I U .. E •- I N L S Y `~ 1 ) .] 1 Q Z'Jt w wu•N UaN I HJ Z 4 www 1-w ' n D JI w U F •' ~n 1 a,n;J S ZY< r I N¢ H l `1 `G •'1 L I ~ .J U p _, > O Y Y Z £ V U V d< V a YZ r J<LL<.-IJJO 4 EmO 1 1 6 CJ L .L q C] w r- Y L N .+ S J LL LL LL Q 4 N ,L W L J l] .L `t 4 R G /I LL J •- Y J N •+ H lU J J N q U ~ U W 1 E u J I1 >> 4 U J U w J J J H LL(< , i Y •- '] [Y t: 7 Z w i.u 0 Z .-I .+ -. O r < ¢ 4 1- tY O F. J 'J L J 'V > IYq 4 W ¢ ¢~u .O fl Lw'Y;Y. Y(1CJV.)H »1~tJ LL I U^ 4 ~ ti w u s t LL' J r- W ~;< •^ < S r^ Z :J I ~q •- r Z !. a)4.( CG£ ^O V ^q EwLLLLUZWZ !, .L U •+ /1JJ ~JUw Or-1-LL rh OO.~ JUL L G ~) ~ 1 J p J r JI ^C] iJ J < ^ t J ~[ /I w w ++ Z V U i u¢ J J J •1 ' I ri>J .L .J S44 '-+OSLLwwwwpCwlY <•+J»Z ~W J I Q • > V J £ " M1Z4M~S j'n tYSiy'U;J1'J ty„¢YY•J I QJ q Z,LL QWLJ61-r^~J m'LXYWJ«6NI+HJ P I 1 1] < 2¢Q 'JJ <(r C:D<=OQ W•+HWWwJ WZ'1 w K¢ ,> li ? N 4/•~n m0(LW~n« iL J•nJDm ~, I U N I < 1 LL I ~JP T Y N Ij) ~ h O Vt V U"•ti •U 4 rL ~V mA)OmW hot ^I fl1 ~ w 1`1 m }I ry ^ •0 m '~ O rv 1 r v w ' J h r i_ I • .v n T w T h i w • I `!.. I 1 Oh<LL\GInY01[tG NU OOm J'Ur-.ttONV ~LL`Pr-`D U~ic\mmO OLL\u. LL\mm~f y\`r •I '~mFON mOII\1I`Y4JOO NF J41mO mUli".1-r"O•f t.~^.GUmF W.+mI[\T'[ H I N £ 1 (}tiM1lU`OM1Glftmi VOMIT yN'~ •'~O~+I~VNI-mrrmLL .+l[\h LL~^J NI[\TI(\y rG ¢ 1 M W W CmP ^P ^ O Nr~r-Inrv V r.v V NC •C. .- by Nmr-w .~. .U J' C 1 n al 31 i a G ¢ ~ NmrN~(.P mPU.-NOI YI[\,pF.Ly`U~NIn ~"[r vl~\uPU r'Nmvlh .y l-y.TO•-•N G Q I PPPPU`O'PPC'G IIU UUUV(lUti ~ ^N hhNNNlV rV lh m(•11" i d I 'n LL\ I[\ yr .C u\ y\ I[1 v .u W W .O W '~ aJ W +~ `( ~ `u W `.. W ~, u) •l, ., W .Ll W W W L a a I .-.. U j 1 `J U O". i V J G v (: . J/ G V V V ... u J r r ~. ~ .. ./~ V V _, ..... ~+ ~. ~// l ~. V v . U 1 I In `n N N O £ 1 i 1 S 5 2 i 2 1 w w w w w w u, rn w V ; r 1- r r r y .M1-r .- Z rr r.-..u r-~.y ui rr ^ < ; N LL s ¢ ¢ z L u Q J LL K w w W u w `L W W -' _ 1U r ~. . ~ r r F H F- l: F- l~ • !- u .lJ /U ] ~) U G:I tJ V N 1.I lJO~r~ Il]r-x000 UUIJ U Cr IJN I.'.UL OU '.J C]UW U 2_ 2~~-L 12Z]' LL Y _ Z~-' 2C 2<Z L > ~' 1-7~ JJ Y,.^iQ Q _ V n-1 JJI QQ p JJ .J GY rLLa a J'LLL J u.7 rt r s r _ ~ ¢ .t .r ~~ z ..~ s < a s s :L ~ \c ,Y .~ c J ti L 1- J~ LL r uY L 'n"~ wv.i uLL 4V ~.J s u _. r L In .n w ~ .n .n u\ In '" /1 1 v. ~ •n rn ~I ~ /, rn ZJ ULL '~+2 < y'• L QL 2 Z L Z.u .,'2 CiL .J '[.Hwr-.! II w LI g Z Zw L K wJh-rn Cl u~.p., u6\u uiu wU`~ G.-~tiONI-~>r.u y>w rl U V 2 V J ~,) w J J V 1) J J r1 i J U U V_'Z' '! J J J P r+dr 1U'-~i -•:J h+ r-. _)n.LLr aU.W ^'Iw LL'-" W 1 JJ<O~.n :L • JL_ JJ -, lLd ~ Jd Z Sd V J 2GJJrJIJJJSF4 Cl 1 H£ LL w J J LL 1Y J LL J~ W 4 ~~ .7 W J\ 1"' > > J J .nLL 1JN ~OV.NV\ •rn£Jrn CJJ` 1V If'N O'n VIr J•)"n Vl <.f'n • LL I rn Wr Ya wrnLL ~~ ur ~]V• v+Yu.n >-LL Cll \ww.uW y1 m~u lu iu r I 11 p' Jw eta ulY wG I,]ww W ,a W Vu u Q ¢ ~ M• Y UL1d 'M<Zl Zl_G'L Zr ! ZdrT Li Ud r-r Fll HIJ IL ry2 y.L »L UY~ J1d2m Jd'LL"F11 InLL 'nlV•u\In ,~ lnwr~W .,r .J LLGIn <1Y •n \nL /"n JILLr-+N I J w W (> a .LJ w J J W> J Q _) J J> a J LL. J LL> S u. O~ 2 Q J J J b J J LL l J 1 .L'L>\J U.t]Jam CW,+J Cy m41U~LJ1[a CuC: LJNU V.000 mm.I L~LWOZ.U 1 1 1 S I > U in U U a W x ~W u a > a a w J1 2 Q J ' > r y w If < .~ ~ ~ 1 W I) rLil N H UCI I O L LL 'r V I / 1 w r $ Y W U] t L u l~ LL N r J J~J U W a s ~ t r- YuJ r1 U~J<2N IL TL'J L Z WJia Yw r-mJLU V..) Y,J IY <J nJ JIa< Uu+Y ~r> >.- LL' V I-) L Z J¢ l In N I_ J ,L > J U J LL U a '1 WJ J.)yJ WWW'nL CJ L n LnIrQ 3 1 ~1Y1- 1r /w2 YI>_ rn00 ¢2 wCL •L I ~- U L in Y N> W W 'n < ') U J J C' 1 Il h' ' L r- LL r)Or-+W ~J Y J1ar Jr/1L JUU W '1 :> I yV a'-rZ4 ViLJLL wJ a46>r~mw wr'LW 1 i ri ~+ J .'l r n i ]: 1< LG .L f J< [] •L VI II yJ •JtL_. =LLL .J J1..).Jlw 9 m U m J, J ~] 0 0¢ U' n J ..y U Y r rJ J 7 J I < • W (.].-I .n r-IUw <a as YK XO 'JYJ 'J<JUUI"'r rd'm jJr~l-.M1H JWruNWW.Om 1( m ~ «< i e a a a i i a s a a i i¢ a a i m m v aai 0 1 w O Y H < 1 .)NPIT 'nN nrmP.YF t•IY r-•p '4 ~+P.yPNYI(~N ~~ a 1 .n mOVrn .n .r N'II MIT r.vrln r-v +..Nm~orrq y vr- .Jr .Onr p wM1O dvti yr fir- n I ...__ ;:l:l::.~.1:..:... .. _ < U u u zu z ..~ ~.iU ~ W L P .2L ~ w¢ w W ~ OMM O w'w2'-+L JU1p YU VI aL J1~0ZI-1 .+L .n .n 3O~u"11"1¢O¢ V C.- Y O r+V JI- wOW Z(~w ~` W a a r- v] ~ W :J .L .L V IY J <Sr .n50r-wUO Z <ti .n2 Zr<ZJ O WO In rn r W a ,J JI j W J lil 'S L7, U ~ YMw nllZ ."rJ H [JO1 U WO )ly rn ~n¢21i Q J W U Y 1J W Y Y< M< Y OWJ(L tL JOZ YU'Jm 2J (Y NYU•LYJJZf9O »~1W l <~W W~rl li 0'. 1i9 O~ m.0 mm~IJ ~v ,~,t(.r Ilt P 'f ~~a yPi • W d < l] Z O_ J u 2 i • L s 3 J W V N N ~ONVLL`N~]rOrur~r•ON:J LL\OO Oln u~s.i LL\000•+InOrO HOIrv OM O O,-O P..C 3311 m1[\LL~VP I~OmI[\U'IPODUTLLIUUU~u\1-rOO''OntO GN100N0`f 31 V'nHr•I .J j/Omv`.JI+I`IL)OI"FNN(JJO`PI+JrO NC:n 1NO`1(•rLL\~n 1U Cl .pU W 1[11\ ~U 4~•4~ti r.G QTY UH W r'S 1{\Y'('.h LL\ fn ~^`7-NNU\ W •4 W W NY'Nm N ~~ N'+ ~ .n 0 _N ~• N ~+ m W rn .~+ N T r+ Y •-1 LL) . Y n S mrlnwl-WPp-•Nn+rln.rrwu`~-•Nmr\n~l-,v u`c., .-hmrln .tl l-Wmc3 .+Nm mm mm mm mrrrrr rrr rrln .n l(I LL\IC\~-~ ~ u, .C .G v. LLL. .[l W.[I ., SI-rrr- ,OW `OW K. .uSW•1w u u.Wn .D u. .Dr L.V wl ... :lU ~.. .. L,O W.L N~.:Lw V: W .1 J(j L V u.~ JOU.-.i \. .+V UC ... J V Vr\- ~- v v ~..- l ~ J V cv ..UJUU Vv L s s s 1... ;c _ s 5 s LL u . I w i i i i =~ ~ H f- ~ H 1 d P" qQ Ol.1 LIN U\.. UpHOC] U WO pUrdpO t.1UO pw pU I Z Z L L L Z ~- Z. Z L Z Z 2$ /r -' L Z VI $< J.L IJ` U~NLLJ ~ /• i JJ ~~~ J\LW LL LL Q LL k U LL LL M ~L LL LL 1 ~w LL W LL w u. _ W U I ~Y U rY .L L J S C S W IY -~ Q .L 1 V Y ,C LY LL Y 'L .Y ~ IY .Y 1 4 L C' - ~ d rl 6' .L rL d w W u. +r Y lJ Y ~ 3 ~ L 'L '..u V .l. 1 ~.~ rl ~ .C w ~ _ Il U i 1 /1 2 N .. ~ U r J1 N Jr VI JI W UI LL Vl N Q G JI VIN n /1 N /1 N J\ I L u L 2ZSW2 L ~ ,L ~yU W f]ZZ HwE ZNZG d'1 WU '~L L'G ~LW WHO F' \dl-Wwh WWW Ww V 1 U< U$aJU JG UU WU.J ~.) Jw._L•EV V Y~~M '1LIVJUZ UJ I-r Y .y n -~ J HI ••I V H •C L ~-• ! rLL-I I-+ Y Q H H W M M H j w LL H J -' JJ$JJC J(1 r"'~+<r`•VIJ JLLJJJ< WJJJjJ U I JOU ~•-J J ;LL < 1 HZ2c L LL V LR 1 J1JS. VId VI 1n Vl HVIVI~JIf \A .LWV ).lNrJl IJNVI fVl 'n U1 V1W 1 I J\ f W 1n H In J 1. w ~ J .)I I^ L] V I I .n vl d' Q .~. ay y V1 N LL VIN W r. N \/I VI V1 ymQWtY W'ICw -~S ~4 ul<W JyIL £J£ WUUi u.1WWJ[J F-WW WO H I ZI W ZU'LHOL .r SyM L 3 ~) G W6 :1 LZZ LuF-M2V YtY G Z 22 j' LL h• u N u H '- Vy'I 1-\ I-r ^ .-• rli r-r .II • Y .-I .-I -) H U " 1-1 N ~ w H H IY J I ,/I V Z vI .D V I y H V l, ..-. G VIN u I u~ 2 ./ I F J Y i 4' 3 ./I IL JI V I VI S LL~ N JI N LL V I. ~[[ p O J J H Z J H T J 7 U 'a J J w J w J J ~+Cr C J w V w W J J W W p 7 9 p W O J ~L <•J W./I ,ll ~.f)rnv OWU.L..ri~')T.JV ~a-.vS 11 n.n ~jIW 7Q 4W(L WR mY I ~ ~ J H ~ LL p L w ( W J L H M W N 1 N O F- 1 2 CL < O W 1 ~) 42 / 1 Y W d y F Z W S VI /I i LL O rn ~ a U Z L < w ~ /I ¢ U ~] .U. ` O W Z IL w Z W H 7 O w L V ~ ~!~ W 1 ~ Jd J ~UI)Z"^ /. 'L V`ll L V.YCI'• VY f•~ 1 < < Grrr 2u •/Iw IL. LL L .nrr 2/I 3 K< V LI- v) Inw nU W.2 JO Od I 11V UU.Y L i JI L~ <1" WT -1 .il J <4(~ Lj~ d W u2 UL JQ 1 N 3- <':]d' W JI LLL]f- h- tl:. IL D Y. 3la WUF1 ZIZ d~ Z /1H JH1.]J TR illJ Ur-MHi~\)JL H..1CS~~tCJ U .tiR Jd'")64U H.)CJ NI-000 "r> >~'-1K<W S:]CJQSJYHO O SW V< '1u YL•'1{ ',L 1UJ 9"I.J .IWYIUUrSWVI tYV Ur '1WYU 4Q{H ru. G']01U GW'DU< ..,' S<Y~ WZO L WI" tL /1 ^^^'^L U_. .CUU ~~S < wynlY .ua<4<r1+IdS0 .-WO I W`-r /V G Z J? ~ fILOL JYZC] UiOO U' V~Ow~--Y (yZ JLL ' .-U JL G L •L J C Q,/ILy (IuJM2 W JyH J G L 2 (O. It JLLI"ILLw 2L~.Ja l~J\nX<nL.uOL ter- 6lLU JIJ Y\LQOJOC O~~ ULS uWLLJll v. WLL 9,JJKZ SI^~n ~" 1 yMI•.UiL IW YS ~ 1-w.-I iJJLLHS .L .N<d HMI<Y YSF•Y~U6N<f ~ J ft \n Ol] JJ JJ$IYR Z Q I_ Q W NJfY 21~H'1"'U £LL JT.OW V U ~ HJ W l <(<t «WS w ZLJ <LS MH rI tJ t]OOOJRJ J <( W I UVUVUU <'JU VUYUU /IR UU VUUVVU~DU(7V VV 00 O I .{IT'ILNI[~Vr-IrmJrV tT nl ~p J'JN.OO •YNU`m PN 1[)dNN HIt\nw+rr VrvN 01-u.p .owm Nr P.~nwcOw ?O W4 Pti 1 rv JI r~n•rr r.Q L.O .Or OF mmm 111~R `D I ' 1 I Mmp OU JmrvO U'L[V m~O ay O~NOU:..JUU CUUY -0wOV O'n •'+pOPU I I I~OPNH~n NPU UNO NNNNr U•-Im.+G vr•'OmiJwC.Jm OO N..P OU•+ON Y' £ 1 'l\Y.h Jm Thl•ly l[f ... L, ~A Wpm (i .f 111 .y 4iG WrLL\v JPS.~~ av NNf"31~h JPN Q 1 ~'• m •-1 •+ N ^' .p'• Y J (`I rl W (1' N u ~ N N N N P .+ h .y y .y 1(~ m ¢ 1 • ¢ 1 .f 'y r1 H ^ .O LL q 1 ¢i 3 1 < I l7 2 h 1 `Ym V]hm PORN 1`iYY: W r.Y U` rJ ^'Nmvyl .pr .DP U"'N I•iYy].Oh 1J`J•-1 ^Vmv O ¢ 1 ICI-1-hl- F Epmm U W e~ym~il a: STS U`P'S V ,rN PtT to C:U J 000tU Ov.-i N.vtif. S Y-1 L.(ImW v~.ya.L .u .~W WW`C'.LV (/u vrr r h1~ FNh1'-I~ < Q I ti .+ .y .-. ..y ~. .v ~~ ..y ..~ .+ ...y ti N y . U S 1 O.,O.. .~ J J(iv~ --~ vJC.. .~ ~..~ ,~ ~~ J... ,~.. .. .~'. c.J V [ ~ JOU.-~ J V I N V. y1 O I L ] Z y 1 I lY U I Z I H ~. .-i H ~ H 4 I K I K L ,y ;y a I W 2 ~ ~ Z H r .~ ~ l~ u I I O JG L+IJ b GWUGUU LIOU GL~O GUW G O Ow0 I L Z! L 2 LL. Z L Z L 2 L 2 L G L Z O Z L. w I J - J _ v[ ~ J G _~ J J J O V O J J J G O O ?. J I I J 1 LL LL LL :L u. J u W :L w Vy yyJ, 2 .Y ,( .•, ~,Y (Y c Y IC .Y .L T ~+ 2 L 'G C IY w .L 1' H L 1 ~ C L: u W y ~ U In [n [n ul N u• ' I L w w/ W u F-. L L /1 i L GI j c L N w< W < W - H w Z Vf L ' UI VZ'JVV JJHVIJ V~~H [l 1. li [/J Vu iV ZVY V V~'1 In w p, ti '-• Ll 4 u q rl '+ q C] H .• G r+ W H I W I JILL JJw JLL'-+< y J~iJJ J~ Z J J JJr+JQ JJ ~-'IJLLCJJNJ1nJ I V'N4 nOVI V1:nJ .^u,m'nv h'N UtN•-j JNJI D. 'n .i •-NJNmn Z I NU 1U~N , ~1/I JI V~VI to .i JiYNV /1 VI Vf •-HU'iQ WI WQww wUU~ ny a rIWU.'lt +~ wUwJ ~'WJtLLL H:1W wClu 1-' ~K~Yryq 2V ~u WLG ~L GZSHHZIJL'•V JMG HH2.n I-I []r. r.IHMC)~ I .•1 Z LL V y1 U Vl LL ~, U ~n'-• ~ n J u :(\ N i 11 '~' J+ L Vl './1 4 W u1 '^ L >1 J /1 LL N ' ~Cl1 JJH~LL W%J.(JQ JJ.J J1xJVVIJJIJJ WV)w J.7 /IJJ UJOUOW 1 1 UOU1 D[.JDU•Yw.Y4-0ZW Yll.~.uW wN Vlu u.O .Y Jl ~Y y94VIW .L -0wCIS ;] I 1 1 w 1 H V I u: ~ 1 w 1 J H 1 h s ~[ Y :+ ~~ I .. u .i to a z w W v v u < I- I ~ 1L N J • < I 2u gYln y1 :n C]N U L q ~VH •i UKV N I t•1 Z U H J Y Y h i 1 Q LJ J ('J Z w JJ JMIY Ot') < u.L ti~ U (YU ~ LY UW2 < I C u4 ¢r; ~n .V.. 21 V'-+<N Y r Hr~23n n(YO N H•MHWZ K Z ~`"'dn d<U WW.C O!L r-H fY :-• J UUV1~'n 7lY q w 5 y Z w [- S Y L V C J Y 1 J V ~"~ L ( Z rJ LJ H J J V Z 1~ ,J w H :J J :] J1 [L W Y Y W ~ H J W Z W 3 V (1-lJ 'JV V!_ O~- 3 2:L ..+ w u. lY to 2 w~1¢ JU ZY196 ~JOJ 'u 'JZ Q.LH QH C].tJ JI'~ r./ILL JJ .Y JI..IJ £L M JZI.u OH 5_ LLJN{[m:u W<N~uIL~ r£U KNO ~J'11WNW ' O J ,]V¢ L.] J(Y G • W K '-H W ZZ 4 JLJ W QU Jn1 .t, 0,']1Y.V \) ~ r) , r ~ Y ti .~ 1. Y J ti 4 L a' n Z ~/ J 2 V1 Y J H= U y (J (LL y. IJ W V< L ' :n +~ 2'L GULL q,JJ O£.+.. ~ G£tJ ~. Of-L <t4 4Vw V~ Vf I w u ur1 6'ui 41.-1 H11 J..J QZU' Z UQ 'nYUZOUL UNQ I U.]Y wJ •S .uZ w""U:LS Y Y Y dK W 1'/1 /1 J jin 2 ZtDr Z21Y ~ W r J 1 'JOYZ[-~11-Z Y'Jr-~Z2'L 'LVWOYUIJ JO ]w WSJWt q.Y 22 GLL ~J<q'J XVIS WJW (O((q<ZZJV jW JIL W<J JID JZJJf- S=Z< ' W 1 SwW H.yH gU$Jti WO W (L 1(L Ww Oly02 «< W W Z 2 QOWLL I m w i `-UU UfJ CIUW71~t]LL'DLL'LL LL4(D (7U 11UU X. Z'= N.-••N7•~2Y I O >_ I _ n <~ .yl-my:~y .r amlcl~~v nhmml-y\`h 1-<'P m,OI mm ~ ~ LL mOllluwllmNl- w mnl ••IwmfmpP NY rvN N ~ 1 O..r-uY.. uu\.Jn .l .r ~.y L1~:11-IY n[[1L r F. Jm K 1 r t.. _ - - _ - • U h r i 4 S 1 < 1 p 1 Z R 1 O LL 1 i O. 1 4 4 I ~ S 1 U o x u z i a ¢ 1 ¢ 1 V 1 N I W 1 O 1 i 1 • 1_ 1 .. 1 • N 2 < 3 U N J N ID W 1 V Y N < 1 LL N l~i~ tLOO.LmO000wG~mONLLNmu rvmUrvC~r pGI~~~N.DN000V~IP •ONO OmmmrV ~; p..l oPU\m GOU01-rv Pln 1`'IO NmN ~IWGl uL .OJ .DUN•'•P.pONwLL\F ^uVJ'A M1J VI LL\I`JY P:JY O.y p-•.Ir MNON.+ .y ..rmhJN U.r NN•-~Q~.L. ~{L NIA WfV P•^NI[\ m4\N•Y ry wrv ~W .~mr Nd.~••r .. .. Y.. r .+.r Y• •'• fl N W 1(\.OrWQ~G•'•NmYU~.Jr WLTU ti1VmY1(1yF wP V..N(~Y,t\,pr W0'J..~NmYLL\ •'••-1 •'1 ~•.+rv NNNNIVNNN Nmnl ni nrm nL r• 1•in mYYYYYYYYYJ'LLLWLL`I[\IL\u\ rrhrrl'-rrrrFF rr rF rr rrrrrrrl-rrl-rrrrhrrF rl~rr LUOCJ ~. ~, OJU'~.J.i JU JCJ L~ v OLU ~. .. _ .J .. ~. .. ,. .. ... u.. U~-.JUGU UU /. w s u x : a. ¢ s u < ¢ ¢ i ws i z i ~ s ~- .. ~ ~, c ~ ~J u u L U u+pG L)UU GO ~IJw U O tJb GU Lnu p4ILUptW0 Z u ZJ_ Z Z Z L r Z Y 2 2 'J_ Z L P L •+ Z U rGU U> OULn "!.~' J U UUI- >O p_+UO<U u LL W u d u 2 IJQi .JOw S Ln :Y C Y• ~Y Y LL 1 r ll i-• 2 .. LL' L 4 iZ .L i l .L ti (Y .L G > p, LY L L J r w$ iut WW LUri ~L •nU 2V1NJ nN .~ vl V\Qr V1N nNV. VI IJ LnU W ~ NZZU uL... JL L W (/I VI )~. W r Z~Y Z C>In Z LInL z2 W 21-• wLi wtiQLiW w .1 Zw JW WN^ WW~W 1W¢SW} UIYWUtJUI-•UU_ liUwrL iu J ~.'r <UUi •JJ VJUvLU~J r•1 w U 6J •-• .-. r I-I r• (1 i r+ U .r 1 ~~ a r+ v ~ 1- •-• r+ rn i-. f < n W J yLnZ JJ<J .~ JJZ$v jJMJ i J•+ jJJ W $ JJ2 JJJ J~'.JV1Q <'1 W 4 p -) 2 IJ ILO LL LL H U l/IN>OInN LNV1 ..~ nM>•-•9 ~I JIr 1'N 1.Y V1N JI VI~VINN V1f 1lr«OW wY W w,i InsU~ i 11 V\ 'lI /~:l N W Z~ `n WN yvt lnr YN V Qll (J ~~JUw w4,Yw OU ww••I IYW r$-1~SOM.Z-. ZL~-.-LIM 4Z~•G 6L OL w22•+.t L•«ZIr Z'L.LUI<2 <rw.. SD ~.L •-~~1-~I ~n LL'~^~Cl rrrwJ L~+•. r'0Kw VIZ NLLNVLLLIn /ILL ~yN J)ViLLLr ~1W YrWlJi pi Lin LnML WJI NI"•VINNIYm VI UU<wI7JuJOw,~.7 ]<UwiJwJJla J.u WOUDU p'JJ <D OJW'+D w rLU V IZ W<(IS>l .D :~ W .`. .AUU S.. ,J twUV :Ili ~mIIJrV+.Oai W W WLPJm VvI i j w V 1 ¢ F ~ a i 2 ZLl W U~ w < w Y L~1 V L L~ Ln 1 ~ J ILL4 U .•J W ~ w M LL U• •Z ~ 2 Z tJ lJ VI 6 'j '. u zp ~ } r ¢.. V L ~ O V ¢ lL r-• > O O U N Q =UJL WQ() U(L>(L VIN nU M W 2 2 O p U 0 N J< •> U W> T N w O J Y 00 C10: il)~L VI VI CI J S'< < 2 J UJ) J Mr Qr-Ur WL .:W Ln w1: 4 UIJ <L <¢ N < 1 } l'J 'nw< H<~^`^ <£ Y~Y ••I.J nn~~-I OIYh M Jr W UU Lw C i ~ IL []Y JW Il L VIJr• O W LI-• <_~ » W>/IW JO. J~njJN UI-~l ••I VI< 'JW O~J O}W Wr NW VI Z1' U 9 W<L1i)w JLL U¢£:J f- YUUUVI ~J WOLL YN Oi' 1 S'1w •LMJ~-•4'l 1UU SLGWG•-• ~Y •LJ Gt I~iY ZZ YLL OJLLIn .Z-IV"IJ6L•_y L_ l)J22 Owe-•P.O.L HJ<Q_O~N2<¢ O O J J W 1 V' V ~ J J /• .JI l) .y 1/ V J J ~) C U LL i< U N W W I"• U ~[ l Y O U! f VU Rv. LU iLY•- JiUL 6.C S4<U ~ YU U.-1 .[ r wr YY b 7u n~ YrG G L L W OJZ L Z L Z I LL~-'IJ2 JO 1 V Z M~U OCJ '~ Ln -)p 1 aYW u... •. ~u<Y <•••u <YOUI-•OxmLLLL .u I-Iw rl ...2 22 ~• ~Np OI-+1-'I~1-LJLSN•~TUFI In ~n<Se•1 Yl<mLLOJJV _Y J .J«w~]UJ •«44«~-1 I.10«f<~mJW W<SI.1 •+O QQ yIJI tt < J J J J J J S S i i S L L J R S S L L Z 2 2 2 L Y LL LL Z LL LL G d ll1 OIL S LL rYmPY W'LtirWWJ1-ON Wr JV~'1~mW^ •('q •0N O~.-1 LL\ L mP mr YNy~ 7Y.•{)`Y~1®•-1W Nr N.Omm~•m 0•T 1{l I(l ILIm 0•+mr~-I-CI.pWm nrlY •pYl~l-~{t J1 .p 1~M.O N1i~i .p O~YrV ~ •D •4 I1 ~I ~ j ~~ 1 n•~0041P It mONVF ptpOF.r000^C F.+v000~uF ONNOLOOONOJ •I ~tr'OVl-0••IUPNPV3WON•yJ OOm OPNI[(^•-IPV JOVt-OGU\UmP OO H 1 •O LI O.OtiONI~d•r:J..W4+~nmlp•r..,,f. LInP GF LF WmF.y tp l[\.p V.SO.+Ii\N1~NJ • <1 mN•rO ^•ONm4\-`+, ~W W041 rvlnv~f\ .~ u\ui:: a,PN.:N4\m OrvF V.. m W • 1 m 1(\ •1 N .y / V N q/ y v .•1 N •f OJ N m • u ¢ 1 < s I •. In r .rv... m LL < I 31 I < I Z AI LI+mPO•-IN mrLL\WM1 UJ`:J.-~f~~n SLL\.JF UJ•'~)^I\I r~Y LL~~OF 4)O'ti^NInY LL\L O ¢ 1 ~NW~r. W.p W.4 ~. +1 u/Si .pFFFF FI--FFFM1 w41W W i).f14141 f, ;}-(T NPP PU` S S 1 Flrf f M1Fr FFFF1~ FFF FF FFFF FF I~FFM1F F FFF F FFFFM1F J U 1 u1 V\ N Nu O I 2F £ ] £ 3 i~ 11 S 1 1 W W ../ V I •- r ^ Z .+.-~ H .r W .. H F• r• 1-1 W < I s 1 s.c s .r I- r. I ¢¢¢¢~ 1 w w w 2 w lu w w r 1\~ S 2ZS 2(D I y7 H W ~: !.) t,\ G Lp w U L U (.I (] O L` L1 W V l I V: L] G C] G CJ 1 N L G~ L 2 L L Z 2 l /1 Z Z G L 1 ~ J2 ~ ~-) J 7 J J+I w DO L ~-' 70 I Y U Y \: .u w! •~11:r W.C2 lC .ui.•.G [ :Y U',G 1a nS1 ,LT Y L U }<w..1 L ~ JLL I.Cd~ /W ~J/ 9.u 1 LL n IY LL 4 Jl Jr N G JI l~ I~ • IJ JI JI I ] rl li ~nLJ J.; l.S L1:2 VIL.nL ~L L-- iL7¢~ •yLL 2 UI Z Wr'•J JJI£ _J /V WJ•-•U )<OF ~ VU(WJ(LUU u) J UV~~ S4•-:- •-+QY"'• ""Z'~/-LJ (•y^ rn LL.1 LL: Wl•n l••1LL ^^ Z Z 6 d j !f] LL J J 1 L J J J 1 J Cl J 1 J O J < Y C: Y Z J J W ~ LLI J J M J u i .+ < d~ o ~ ~. d w s x w a a z s 1 f V1~J~n~ IN ~'7J ~^.N^ ^1-•fL£/1 ?p•-VINf~n • W I J :-• ~ u~ W ~n J '_ ' I I~ V I V ~: n •.1 w J/ w y N j Q w 3 •-/ -~ Y V 1~ ~• Q l J W u ~ H In l-•G \fYwW u ~. \l <1.><w u1 w_l• F I < to ¢ J V W 2 •-• .. L a: 41 :-• L 2<^ L M1 L i l n• L ul d L 2 V Z¢ Z Z S H I W S •" "~ 1 F -~ < ^ r J_ r-/ L I--• ^ .J J\ !~ LL •-• \Y M ^ $ J ^ H ~ I JIO}4n OIU l7 U•-+ ~•C tLV ^~n^J~•-Ir _ 1LN•"I .u !/' /12u uZ\n /ILL/• G 20<I ~ CYw~U.J J1wJ~J<O¢~:L / ) Q ~T •+•/:V }per W <w00>YIJ ^N<V 1l)1 (Y^ W •', Lt7 '1S L .)1111 b 1 .1 •- ) J.u P.7•F J6I yj J\!.U WOLL W I I I 1 JI 1 • i d 1 V ± \J 1 FL• Uy.~¢1-• 1 U U U J d J I w 1 umW u I Ln v t r_ L- ~. L u ', I w p G wGODU1Zr i O ~ 1 ••1 1 < ••1 r•• •-• N JI J W 'i 2 _ V .< w 0000 <rn7V H 1 S ,~ O ~VZ n ~1 O W W wUO~> V N 1 a nH.n (LV N LL Z nZ«<4 J0¢ i< H I I+ QZ.n mZ tOULLnC dL] £Q•'11"I •-••'•I<UW ¢ L L •+ < •+ Z W.. a V~-n ~4 JLYG 2 V H j ~- < p rv-\t Y';1 Ot.. Jlxw SF- ¢¢(Y ¢.+W i ZO ¢ dV ¢wVJ J6~~ •'~nV J A •OGw U~(~Aw N ~i02 S' 1 1 v w d Q J L. •y Y <'J J J J1 J Y w /• LL LL LL u LL I" ¢ W V 1"1 < I W _.uJ.( I~Lr-12UJ U•-~J Ss Wr nr-11-•M•~..WO¢J a ~ O .L I Lp¢W J O•'I l~~<O LLln7 <1'•1~-'•N JJJJJW LH.•1^(L ¢T.YU _ LSwd 61l .O S~Jq J9LL Cl •(J~nN4£'n'L<a'«<J lO :7~(TW WWL I ••1 VI^£~ .•• .V L2 <wL"J U Y$:yw^UUUUUW •V1 L)]U VI J~In n'I .J VIWwW L "•0+1 Jr~.] W.~YOOV JJYQ UYI: ~J OS ,L IJ .-•:Y r-(JW J'h ~C}Jn-Q JUrZ>-1'-•ZZ2L LZ 4 •2M¢2 U Z1.~ •1'~ •11YJ 1--•-•QUL /f N) A ILSS.C S.jNOJINJtSO W l _ W 1: J u. J ti Q\ V u• H X C J ~"• Q U W W W. J J• Y W ~/ 1 .~ 1 M~ l u I J ;¢< \L ~ WU} L L~nJw<L ZLL61 N2 C'!ZL•]:22*JW W •••Q1r~~1T ¢NI'-' J I ZNwJI r-I UVIYWW}W=LL¢WW<rl•f l"Hr.'-1+2»2ti-MAW IJOWIY'-jJ1HZ Z'L LZ<J JK Jd WW¢f•1J J.7U~J» <W WLZ iaW 4\ 1 WwLW.+n-10/I It«QaWw W~yw Y=N tHO O 00 I~w•~ ~~~5 ~ W I C¢H Y,c (L¢¢wNNIn J1 VI VI UIN VI VI InZNV1 UJ W~ fOV <I mm NN~V JIM •r 4\M^J PUfP•O VQQQ~~~NP ~vP t4\ p ~•O W LL i 'D.-IO W..r b..•O TP^~ PNf~n N~1 .0 •-1 IPNW lO I~ •I Orr u...v lnmr••. ..~~r.rrl•-.. #r-r w.n ~u +11- ' =._S .'-s_ _ .._s s s =1 s3 _~: __- _"'s_ct rx ee-~o s a s e i i 1 LPG rvo mrl-cU~mPO-Gln ,nmo.]o Glnooo-•o r P~•r lf ~mP V ~IPmm ~ ^ 1 1~ 1 F £ 1 Ip m p N Nll I OI G Wum00 QUO fJ . . . . . II•. . . . . . Pln..lnr,rr•om•cU\mw•mv1{\.Jrvm`. 1(\U W.~-, ~L U\O rvJr-rv f 1 mNNYm Nm••IF YmNOm ~.-r GIV mN"-IF ~+Y '~'•+ O ¢ 1 . < Y I ~ H N a f I j I I 1 V' 1 z x I rvmPO..rvmrY\.YI-m.TO•+NI"vV\,p 1-wIT J.. ry,~IVU. 1,r O R I PP PO,:iO OOOGGUO•-1 •+.+^ ~+•-~••-..h ryr.INhr.,nN £ LL I 1"1~61mg i~~mml m mm~ 4 a ^m W ~m • Smta, LLr <I 1m ¢ f 1 r ~ ~ .n N• ti .... V J I JIJO1... .i ,l r'U IJG-•.J ,IO.~,~~. ... ~Vv.+J.~,u r~J li ,. . . ;.] 7 _ V 1 I N n V £ F 2 1 V r Z r. ,- ¢ , M O'. I IY 2 L I S J I F C J 1 G pUU UUGIJ LiUJI J GW GlJ JGIJ L Z L L L ~ Z ~n C Z U ul Z L ¢ Z L »J ~~ J .~~w DI-,W ~ G M» 1 LL u. LL LL LL L 1 J J LL LL w W w, ., r LL.. n i ~ ' ~ .c Ir..Y i ~ ~c G s z r a t r u M u. ~.c ,n 1 M ~o rn ~ v ~ D ul :Y G ... r. n v v ulr ,n t/1 /1 tY yl G u r N •n N w U I I LC L_+L L d ,nw . L ~1w V1 L. Z•-• ,nG +i u1 WS2 t"+N ¢ wdl ... J•-w•.. ,=,yw w,nrui„..2•-r ,nw U I :J U U4 V V V 2n+J 1r-• G JpZ V LJ JGJQU uJ [l ,n '~ ,n I _ - ,-, J 1~ •~ U J LL ~ r-• D 1-, r-r 0 J 6 •Y ••• r-r 4 Jl ^ w I JJJ1n JJ Jq 6[L _ Z£LL rJ F J q D Jp. 6•-JJ) < i G i i LL G r Y LL Z L Z W J Y~ n J /1 ,n In ,L ,n VI Jl ~ W i n i ti U ~ .n N 'n .J ;n ~ •n Vl u V 1 S 1 vVa ,n ,,AW,n ~YL UI - vrN f N / , N W I W W W 1- t .u W J w ~ ¢< :] +. ~ u U J ui u/ W LL W G 1] H I LZZ022 LUh U d.1ZFZL C~ZU JL\J 2J,-•L LUZ 1 r, 4 .... r•• nn ~'. .-..L '+ Z LL " u :] .-, ¢ n .. U .• Y r •-. O r/I N N Z N n Jl j' n W< •-, l y V I w S L I In LL y' .Y W/ I V I U LL I ]J~~gG]JW gLLJ J1JQW,]']"JU/WWJLLIyw2JJWW ' I I ,OmmUWm:O>SgmW QV iS~I]¢WLL».n ~J JUUl r4 m£L I r I y I U a' 1 ' -n W > ~ I 1 F 1 f n 4 . , I m I o ... W 1 u Y J /, ~ W W ~ ~~ 1 z •+ G 1 _ 1-~ f M 1 j W ) LL W 2 LL < N R tt N K rl V lD U Z I W i V N W O w ,-, W V 2 O p (9 N 1 2 G ••1 W V•"I U vl ~- NgwM2 7 Nul 2 I q V 10 pW w £JrYy ~~ W < I J L2 < t~ r5a]OZ 5 VfYLI-ZL n q~Y ~ 1 W U ••• w LL 2 L~/ U ,-• ¢ ,G ¢ f 4 ,Y '-~ •-, ail C V Q I ,1 y ,.~ f w d JtL JU J1Y 1-•,ulT JJpWJ J q V 1W M 3 p2 i f<U1J•OU,J "'I 22 Z WO.f 2 t N,n Y p I r1iW ~ ML Ol.YLJL Wr')ru lT jrNn< :]C19J i LL ,- ¢ H • r J W •-• J ~] W „'• q W W IL tJ . n M w q) ££ Y d Y ¢ O rn •1 N Vl J J( £ U m LL h Y J¢ (Y •t H 2 V< G it N ,JI ,n V it Y¢ Jy>_ a ~I~rn q •••6' YU' ¢U r,m ,-•tiUrq r f,l J/\-+ YN ) L,~ q L u. L d<Y£.-iJ 1 V1OU'L.U n ,-, 1 J ,J ,L ~ y ,u .n L ~••, w LC IY U l J l ,...1 w ~1 1 ff jl-rU JWl~W(],~] WW/I IYWU•"1 •'I r", ~1721.ZLW J 1 21Y Zuy 12,nJ Wc7J1-•1J~1-•1-UJjZ ZOGj Y 1 2,-WmL ¢+t 1LNJLJr•fC j( JuIMNJJ JY 4W 1(\ I W W S•y ~--, 1SpZ f Q•'••••f t •w W W W 1.1M • Q•>~ W m w I rrr-r.-•-•~r-»yy aV jLL;SJ;S 2pU YYYNN 1 w r u yl N < 1 1 4 I ,Tm mm mr-.y lnmPrvm mmW Y•'-1 IQmmNr~m 001-.+ LPI"OrvGm•'•m FPr[t ~1-•+I~mul .•1 •pPll\N •Y O" mF ~aV I a-m y11"Y,OrNIgFWL rN L••r~1{M OIMWm 1.111 1.m 1 li ~ L l _` .._ `_ ` `. L V L ~~ a P v N Y U 2 J U • COP 1 `b; ;'^`~' 'yw;i~ ""' w~wwd-dw.rwrr ww. wn. r...lr lA-". w.tiw,w. N.aa. • YNStNgM Iq Y~OIbSR M71M1 YL7rq 1. Tnry51 W IKlaS451 1A! N0. 8s -o a- r. oy.Tr N •ISYre www~. e.ra aI ,ate dm,. ~ .,..._ ~ ~. 1blwM.y ~~ Barnac~irw t.1:L.~ 1...::. - Swvw,u.El1~ 0lQOSAE1EfAl 1w wAri~w/wlrT ~wlw Mw V~I~Awl r.lrww Iww~ Tww, h1IwI i faAA1gD 0 MTIKAIREfI AASwI waw Sw. ],OY ^ .\aw~ w.^.qa .: .e L:dl IbwOnlw _-`-y. EM[I:1 paf. ]. MgS1 p TS.SMLCTOWSI ~ ~' ITR I.:.J L+ l 14w a Mir aaLnan ~nii S. I.aaw a M.b.rNrnYw w/ SII.a .a1J Ja::lallan n ~ y ~C~ E :nar nnra ~.r .a .lane : TOTY .136.50 • N Inww I:rawSi. ) An M1Tnirl Mliw TV~T„~ J 1vr~ ~~ Ciw lwipT 1 ~+ ~, 11w~ ~ stir ~M WwitlN a • fawN 10. I1n~ T^• ww .wMwi w:1 a Xw wwiww a Ilw AAwIwS N 0 Mwwa c«i.I An .. w..lai.. a i. o..ww+J .. wwy w w. AaTI AJO 1 t. [~IYn • "T!3" www w ww ~ w 10 w w wwaMnwl .ItiTA ial M Mw~A OwI a 1151 ~ryM1aS^Ii. • 13. AwFwnl Awl Hl Nnl wM wwwSw Tw/w1N in M~Nb IK~nIN wwwlw wl1 Mw aY M~ pYSIM~w M ~ ~w (YI iw M .NI wa~w w twN w /wI^I w M ANaa a. a Xw wenlian al w AkdwYT M.waw CwwN 10. STAT! W CAplOSWA CwnM a .__._a.._.:.A.:Jd...._...._.......Oew..... .r.?~d._........... ww r. • .....a.~ . . r ~'. _ _ xNn ../r.,w ~ n.w~ ~.0~ .. r Mw .,.~ ~.M1 ~n IwM1 ~.~ ~.4 M wwti ~k ~, r w 1C+w.~r ~-w~' ~.! + M +w Own ~1 n ~w. / wJ~~..1 ilw n ,n w/.mn . .. ...r M1 ...u..n w n....~. -w.. iOOi..~ u.M.r Ynti~+ SIGN wMS ....... ....................._.....______.. __............_.....__._.. _.___._......................._ •rn~unoN ~r nIw>3nRw IS. STATE q [AIIIOAwIA Cwnry a ......................................Gw_........................... ~rnr ~M. / ~ .. ~ww +~ ~www n M N M .wJ a In.w1 1T ~. M n nM. nMw wMrww w f..,,,r wO..,~ ,. W nw ~ h n,wM .i ~~4- w M1 ~„w r n M1 wl+~ • '•nnww +Mw n wr,~ 1~.. A wd ,rwAM .. wwti M h ..li ~I.n ~ ~On.nr n O~xM~iwMw n w .fin O . yn ~~- ~.~. .~. ,I~ +~ Yn OwM.T h wr n . . W A ~ nw.~ .~ .w. M ,w~,~., www.. iMw M +wtin n w Mti n .M. ,,.Mn I . h, h nw,ln .M+.v ~. M -,ti... F ww ~Y~. n F I..nw M + hMM Iii. n S ~~~ ^ • ^ bnS.ai M M._......_JYM a........._ ..................dlllw w....__.._.......lwwM NA ................._ s m na ~ Baru w. nn Na WrMe Mbr TGa Liw; iw DepawEa Uw a+r •wwlM: ^ Mr:rM wliw. O ~r rrwE. CoAR W N.m,.-. G L 8 S ~. 3 •. CITY O ~RANCNO CUCAMONCA ~~3.D_. _. _..,~' CWIN PDt D1MtGg ON II.Nti PDMIh"STR: TI(1N "'~'"' ~ V FEB ,1 • 1. Claims for death, in Jury to person, or to personal prop y must bd d pg la• than 100 daga after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.3~~~~~1~.~~ 2. Claims for damages to real property must be Piled no later than! 1 year the occurrence (Cov. Cooe, Sec. 911.2). 70: CTfi OP RIHC80 COCtNOtft yc-'t y~~-~ EL=cn'c-c• /-1.r!-<. 9y 3c y.c T-2,i s~ 9~~~i ~/t 9-3~3Y s~f Name of Claimant Address Zip Phone Age ~am~ Atldress to whSch Claimant wishes notices sent. YBA did damage or injury occur? / .~ i YB®t did damage or inJury occur? i-c~TN~ ~ dwoi FAc./! o~ R/.%o T,7~~c~rC., BOY and under what circumstances did damage or in,Jury ocnurl ?,P,~e.~o [// /Jiv.rro 4!p~,~!AO~ 9T S iu Am i,/ nru R,/~r~e^ ./~ 4.~,-NTH ANO SN daoE r r 7Pcc,~ YBIS particular action by the Clty, or its employees, caused the alleged damage • injury? (Include name9 of employees, if known). YH~7 sum do yeu claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be known at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed. (Attach estimates or bills, if possSble). F1M3.: L.4N LE E N eSf yin ~-Gm6rzc~ew ~-, 2.,. ..-. E 227, v.. Total Amount Claimed: S t1lBL4 and addresses oP witnesses, doctors, and hospitals: gf-/-E,~ ~'R. FF. th 949r/ Fi!oT N.// .Pn,//e (: i~ ~ ...'f.~ ~ [t!i7./r.~r I yY9'G.'f '~ .S.a n: i9 Snrv,a /-~..~ ' Gm Ream/c.~ ?.,~~., ~~o7s/// Ci?.,: Dom: N.,, b.nce i.,r ~~f1~~ Date N~.°ic ~~ '~-,~r~C~ Signature of Claimant • S03(u78)-8C Form D CL BS-oy ~~'. ' filr m iripbcale W ~ ry R ~ V • CITY pDMANCSORATFONONGA • cLnIM ncnlrvsr JPN `x11985 ~ CITY OF ETIfiANDA ~ 9~Diu1lYflt~~~fgig n~f ~ ! Date~ARY 17. 1985 T0~ CITY CLERKS OFFICE CCU `~,~/~y.~~~-Q~~..,,~~,, P.O. eox 807 ~_ 1`'°"""' -"4 Et iwanda, CA. 91730 ~ ~_.~_, , Pursuant to rtre nrnvi5nms pl SeC!ipns 905 and 910 vl the Government Code of the State of California, demand is hereby made ayainst the treasury of the CITY OF ETIWANDA ,State of California, in the amount of § 50.000.00 In support of said claim, the following information is submitted: 1. Name Of clairna m: - MANII Ft _ _ Ai F' IANDRO SANCNF7 - Fm Mrdele fur 2. Address of claimant: 8762 Mipopette Rancho Cucamon.ea._90701 (714) 989-3001 Snerr CrtY Zrp Ama Cndr rnd TeNphvne Np. 3. nddres5 to which claimant desires notice to be mailed (lf different from Item 2~: • • -.i37 N. Vineyard Ave.. Suite 300. Ontario CA - 91764 (714)986-3761 Surer Gry Irp Am Code rnd TrkpA Vpr Nv. NEHMEH & ASSOCIATES 4. Narnp of legal owner of damayed property upon which claim is based: NJ1NU£L ALF iANDRO q9 H lrnr hLdmr Lur 5. Name of registered pwner of damayed property upon which claim is based: NANIIPS etc'teNnan AANCH 7 nrrr nnedk ~,u 6. Dale alleyed damage occurred: NO EMBFR 11 1984 Mon fh DaY Yur t 7. Place where alleyed darnaye occurred~__SI?`~~0_ HIGHLAND AVE., SAN BERNARDINO, CA. Prpndr Sbrn Number or Neemr Cron Sheele B Tune pl day or niyht rlamaye occurred: 9. Public property and/ur public officers or employees alleyed to be at lauh: ~0. Narne, address and telephone number of witnesses it possible ~ FRED GROS ENBACH • __~A9A_TIIRf1110J$~t RANC(lp !'IICAMON[:Ar CA. ~14,~ 9A7-A676 ,w r~ L • CIT1 OF RANCHO CUCA.rIONCA G~;CAagpryC STAFF REPORT ~?~ ~. z ~ !~ r G ii2 U > GATE: February 20, 1985 19'~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubb s, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kr all, Engineer Technician SOB JECT: Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by Genevieve Ives for property located at 18020 Chervil Street Mrs. Ives has submitted the attached Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement to guarantee the construction of street improvements for the frontage of a landlocked parcel located at 12820 Chervil Street in order to obtain a building permit. An irrevocable offer to dedicate this portion of Chervil has been recorded. RECOMIENOATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the az tached resolution approving the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and cause same to 6e recorded. ReSdettfully su bml~tted, _ ko Attachments • RE[DRDING REQUESTED BY: and NHEN RECORDED NEIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CDLAMONGA P. O. Box 807 RANCHO LOCAMD NGF, LAL IFOftN[A 91730 PEAL PROPE0.TY IMPROVEMENT CONT0.ACT 11X0 LIEN AGREEMENT TNIS AG0.EE MENT, made and enteretl into this daY of 19_, by and between Genevieve A. Ives (herein after referred to as "Developer"), and the CITY OF RANCHO CDCAHONGA, CALIF O0.NI A, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred tp as "City'), provides as fall ow s: RNE 0.E A5, as a general condition precedent tD the • issuance pf a building permit far 12820 Lhervil Street • development the City requires the construction of missing aff- site street Improvements including curb, gutter, asphalt pavement and appurtenant work adjacent to the property to be developed; and 4HEREAS, the DevelaDer desires to postpone construction pf such ImprpveAen is until a liter date, as del ermiped by the city; ana RHE 0.EA5, the Li ty is agreeable to such postponement provided that Me Developer ent ors into this Agreement requiring the 0evel oDer to construct said improvements, at no exDe nse to the City, after demand to do so by the Lity, which Said Agreement shall also prpvide that the City may construct said lmprpv ements if the DevelaDer falls pr neglects to do so and that the Lity shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security far the Developer's performance, and any repayment due City. 1 HO'd, THE0.EF09 E, THE PARTIES AGREE: I. The Developer hereby agrees that sne will install off-site street improvements including curt, gut :er, as pA3lt pavement and appurtenant work in sscprdance and compliance with dll 3DPI 4ab12 Ordinan Cei re50IJ t1pnS. r'JIeS and rCgu13[i0n5 Of the City fn effect at the tine of ;he in st illation. Saitl imDrovemen[s shall pe ~nztalled upon and along the frontage of Parcel 4 of Parel Mao 3795 oeing located at 12820 Chervil Street, not to exceed the centerline of said street or beyond the frontage of the suh)ect property except as required tp provide for adequate drainage and traffic transition per :ity Standards. 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed no later than one (i) year following written notice tp [he Developer from the City to commence inst all itipn of the • same. Ins: all anon of said imcro vements shall be at no espe nse • to the City. J. in the even[ the :eveioper shall fail or refuse to complete the insi alla[i on of said improvements in a timely manner, City may 3t any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intentipn to do so, enter pp On the property herelnaf ter described and camDlete Said imPraveaents and recover all coats of completion incurred Ey tfie City from the Oevel peer. 4. ip secure the Derf prmance by the Developer of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City pf any funds which may be expended by City in completing safd impravem en is upon default Ey the Developer hereunder, fhe Developer doe; by these presents grant, Ear gai n, sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following described real property situated in the City of 0.anche Cucamonga, County o/• San 8ernardlno, State of California, to-wit: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map ]395 as retarded ID Book 31, page 31 a1 Parcel Map, County of San Berner dine, State o/ Cali/orn H, 11P11 227-211-]5 13 , 5. This conveyance is in trust for the purposes d escrihed above. 6. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully perform all Of the acts and things to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void, of herei se, it shall remain n full force antl effect and in all respects shall be consider ed 'and treated as a morl gage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties ai [h respec! the re Cp shall he governed by the provisions of the Li vil Lode pf [he State of Lalifornia, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7. this Agreement shall be bindf ng upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, eeecutprs, administrate rs, successors antl assigns of each of [he parties hereto. :~ 8. To the extent required to give off eci of this Agreement as a mortgage, the tern "Develope r•' shall he "mortpago r" and the Li ty shall be the "mortgagee" as Chose terns are used in the the Li vil Lode of the State p/ California and any p Cher statute pertaining to mor[gag es on real property. 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the D revisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum rrh ich the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder ar [0 foreclose the mortgage created hereby, then the Orevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs ana such re assn able attorneys fees as shall be arrartled by the Court. • • • tom,. , ~.~. ' • RESOLUTION N0. E92-28-Aii2 ~ ~ ~ u~C • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAh10NGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN RGREEMENT FROM GENEVI EVE IVES ANO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR ANO CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 80-38 on May 7, 1980, to establish requirements for landlocked parcels where no subdivision fs occurring; and WHEREAS, a single family residence, located at 12820 Chervil is a Landlocked Parcel within the meaning of said Resolution No. 80-38; and WHEREAS, Genevieve Ives has executed a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. • PASSED, APPROVED, and RDOPTED this 20th day of February, 1985. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa • ~~ • CITY OF Rr1NCH0 CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 20, 1995 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubhs, f, ity Engineer DY: Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer C~ ~/ ~ ~ ,, x - ~ ~' I9'~ I SUBJECT: Approval of Bonds, Improvement Agreement and Drainage Reimbursement Agreement for Tract 9441 and Tract 11609 located south of Wiison Avenue, west of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Crismar Oevelooment and release of Bonds, Improvement Agreement and Reimbursement Agreement for Tract 9441 and Tract 11609 submitted by Nubank The attached bonds and agreements for Tract 9441 and Tract 11609 are submitted for Council approve. The tracts, submitted bV Nubanks, were originally approved by the Planning Commission on February 25, 1981. They have since been purchased by Crismar Development. The amounts submitted are as follows: Faithful Performance Bonds: Phase I $141,700.00 Phase fi $148,200.00 Phase III $252,400,00 Phase IV $ 90,200.00 Phase V $650,600.00 Labor and Material Bonds: Phase i S 10,850.00 Phase II S 74,100.00 Phase IIS E126,200.00 Phase IV S 45,100.00 Phase V 5325,300.00 RECOITIENDATION It is recommendeA that City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the bonds and agreements from Crismar Oevelooment and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same on behalf of the City, it is also recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release all bonds and agreements for Tract 9441 and tract 11609 submitted by Nubank. tfully subm ~(p ~.. . _ _ . . ~ VIw~Prer/rwl ~ ~' ' , ~,,, ROBERT NEU FELD ~.~^i • CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Srvefarv, Cr+eN Ke~owr LLOTD W. MIC HA E<• Darr ` feel s.•. .. ,~ ~ ..._+n~n. _._ . ..-. ~ - _ ~ ~ „~ ~ .r ..a EA R LE R. ANDERSON BEVERLY E. BRA DEN VICTOR A. CMER BA K. JR.. ReMrnt CHARLES A. WEST 'f ~„ • iq f .~ January 9, 1985 'A .: " , ,, r City of Rancho Cucamonga "'~'~F~~~'°~/~"~~~"' Engineering Aepartment P. O. Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mr. John Martin Gentlemen: Crismar Development Corporation, Developer of Tract No. 9441 - • Phases II, III S IV (Lots 1 - 72), situated in Rancho Cucamonga, • has deposited with this District a Material and Labor Bond, a Faithful Performance Hond, and a Utilities Improvement Agreement for waterline construction. These bonds and agreements are being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. The waterline ~~ovement plans have been approved. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, CUJfC~//AJMO(N//G/A~ COUNTY WATER DISTRICT .'X iL G``i~~-~~ it Hetty F en Secretary b • ~~ 1 ~, vu•-P.••4••e -~° ROBERT NEU FELD SevNrv. Gene.v! Nav CUGAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MiCHA~ "' ` ' ~ -" EA RLE R ANDERSON VICTOR A. OHER BA H. JR.. P.•Ment BEVERLY E. BRA DEN CHARLES A. WEBT January 9, 1985 ,~ ~ • ^1 .. A n t City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department ~- ,,;~,,,,~ „ P. 0. Box 807 ~ ~ °"'~'~~ Rancho Cucamonga, California ~~~~~~~~~" " °~ Attention: Mr. John Martin Gentlemen: Crismar Development Corporation, Developer of Tract No. 11609, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, has deposited with this District • a Material and Labor Bond, a Faithful Performance Bond, and a • Utilities Improvement Agreement for waterline construction. These bonds and agreements are being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. The waterline improvement plans have been approved. 2f you have any questions concerning this matter, please coatact the undersigned. Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUt7TY WATER DISTRICT ~y~~~t• Betty Fien Secretary b • • CITT oP PANCgO CUCAMONGA IMPR OY EMENT AGO EEMGNi POR tR10T Nei. 9tltl1 a 11609 KN ON ALL MEN SY TN EEE PRESENS S: ihat [his agreement Is made dnd lne P.f td In :m• lh CDnf Of mdnCa vlCh Lne proV(9lofla Of [he Ruodivia ion NaD Ace of tR< State of Californva, and of [he apDlicaol< Drdlnaneea Of [Re Clty of Ra ne eo Cucamonga, [a:vforn u, mu nictDal torpor atlon, h/ an] hecveen as ld Clay, h<rei natter referred Co tR< Clty, Crls mar Development Corporation, CaltfO rota acOrDOrta[von, aM1a-rE tnaf[er re[err ed [o as the Developer, N ITN ESSEIN: iNAi, 4HEREAS, aaf0 Developer desires t0 develop cerca In real property In savd Cl[y a shown on [he condi[tona lly app roveC aumd wtaion known as Trac[ Nos. 9YV1 and 1i60q~ and NHEREAS, aald Clty Ras eataml lap ed certain requlrenen td co ee met by aald Developer as Drerequta tie to approval of said au0d IN laion generally located at 41ilsOn pv=our w/n He rmOaa Avenue NON, TNER EF OR E, It Ss he rety agreed by said Clty and by aald Developer sa follova: • 1. the De veloDer heremy agrees to constr ucc ac Oeve loper'a a;penne all imp rove men to de ser ih ed on Page 6 here- • of with to twelve montna from the effect the date hereo C. 2. Shia agr eenent aha 11 De eC.r ec [ive on the date of U.e reao lULlOn Of cne Count ll of as va Rty approving to is agreement. Thla agreement aRa11 he lr default on the day follow- Sng the flret annlver awry as ce of as ld approval unleaa an ez[en- mon of time naa he<n gra n[ad oy aald City ap hero inafLer prOVtd- ee. 3• TRe Deve lcDer may request an ex cens+on of tine [o Omp le [e Lhe [ef ma Rereef. Such requea[ aha ll Oa aumml[ted CO the Clty In writing not leas coon 3o days before the ezptrat ton date hereof, and sha 11 eomea In a acateaent et ca rcumaca noes ne ceaaltacln6 taa extenelon of time. The GltT shall Rave the right <o r<vlew tha pfOV to long o! thta agreement, lnc lad log the cone traction aLaOdarda, coat estimate, a0d vmDrovenenc aecurlty, and to require adJua[men is Che rein 1C any au0a[a n[tal eRange has occurred during Che term hereof. V. If tRe Developer Ta lLa or neglects to coop Sy vltR tRe prOVlslona of ehla •greemene, CRe CS[y aRa 11 Rave the rlgR[ ac any tlmn [o cause as ld Drovlalana co me met Oy any lavful means, and thereupon recover [roe GRe Developer and/or h1J au rely the Cull cost and expense incurred. 5. the D<veloper aha 11 provide metered voter service to each lot of aald deve lapment In accerd ante wltR [he re gu la elons, achedulea, and fees mf the Cucamonga County Nater Dlstr let, 6. TRe Developer shall Da re eponslele for replacsme nt, r<loca tlon, ar removal of •py aeponen[ of any Srrtga [ten ve tef systen In Danfllot v1[h cone cr u<tlon of required lmprovemenca to the sa tiafacelon of the City Dngln<er and cRe owner of such aster aY stem. • -1_ I~ T, laprovemen[a rep dived :o pe .truc[ed malt CCnfOra CC the SCBaJdftl Dr3Mlndx dnJ $Car,JdrJ ^OD=C I:'1 Ca ttOn9 a( Ch! Ct[y, and [o the Iaprovenen[ Ptan approved Cy an! on file i the off:ae of Lpe C1 cy Endvneer. $a td vnpr r:e-.en :~ are to Du la tea on [he Construe tl on end ED nd Estamate, Here ty ^.c DrDOra tea on pale 6 " ~eof, ds taken ffcm Lne improve*enL Mans :Y. ed [hereon Cy nu mCer. The Developer snail also De esDOnna :e far eDnstfuc- [lon or any [ramitiCna or otter inCldemtal w, eyond :he [tart C~Una sties as needed for sale [y and prcper~. ace dra lna3e errors Dr m¢m usions Jiaeove red durvn; .._ sna ll he Cte] upon L:I[ alfeCtlOn of [!,! Ctty - - ••PeVi9Cd wnfN doer 6o sa as plan amd iflcations sha 11 n! c ..rd~eyc a provialona Cf ch la agree mint anJ aecYretl by th< 9ure[y ~.C.ar ...extne origins: p lannen xo r'R a. B. ConstrwC tioa Dermi[s std ll De oCta anetl by :he OeveloDer Ram [pe mff ice o[ the C1[y Engineer prior to start o YOrk~ dll regYldtionE listed Lherean aha ll 009trVEd, VlLli a::encian given to safety prECedores, control e( dm e, no tae, or otner nu aance to the area, and to proper nDt:fica son of pupltc uti:: Ciea dmd Clty DE Oar[ments. Fallw re to o¢D ly wi to ~nis me a10n shall pe suDJeet to the penalties prov Ldea the rotor. 9. Tne Developer snail De respensab/e Cor removal of all loose rocks and otn er dept is from pup: a ra6hts-of-way vi[hlp or ad loon ang said developaen[ resulting fro.n uo rk relative to saad Jevelmpxen e. 10. Nork done with In ea ts[iD6 streets shall De • • elLdently Dursmee to cC mptecion; en[ Ca[y shoo have the right to co mple[< any and all worw to [ne even[ of unJupti~ied delay In eoxple [ion, sna eo recover all cost and Capense rred from the DlVelop!r and/Or Ilia CO ntrdCtCr by any Idvfw: :9ans. I1. Sold Deve loDer sna 11 at all hoes .'ollowing dedica- tion of the streets and asements Sn said suCSdtvlslon, up to [he co mpletton and •ecep to nee of sa ld vork or tmDrovement Dy fold City Counc ll, Blve good and adequate warning to the tr>v cling pupil[ of eacn and every dangerous cone iLion ezia[eat In sold eCreet or ease went, end wtll Drotec[ the [ravelvne DuDl1c from 9 uch de (ec five or dange roue condi Cion s. Da 41 cne comp letimn of all 1mproTes enta, Heron aaemrporoie0 on Page fi to De Derfor med, each of sale atree ca not acceyted a S aDrov eacn is snail Da uneer the char ge of da ld Developer. Said De ve toper may close all or a portion of any street sup JecL to the Imna atlons contained In • to mD ovary atr[et closure permit, laa ued Oy the L1 Cy En 6lneer, Npenever it Ss n<ceasarY to protect tn< pupltc during the coon [roc tlon of cpe Smp ravemen es herein agreed to be made. 12. Pf rkway trees raqulred to pe planted snail De planeed py Cn• Davalop ar after otter ImDro ve Went vorN, grad ir.g antl cleanup Ham Deen completed. Pla nt log shall pe done as proviJed py Drdlna nCe Sn aCCprdanCe N1 Cn Che D1anLing dlagfam approved Dy the Clty Community De velo Amen[ Director. The Developer snail pe reapona lDle for main coining all trees plan[Ed to good nealtn until the cne of the guaranteed ma lntenanc! per log, or far one year after plan Ong, vhlcnever la later 17. Th• Developer la reaDonslple for mee ctng all mend i- • bona cats elta has Cy tM Clty pursuant co the BuDdlvlat on Map act, Ctty ord lanefa, and to la agreement for Lhe development, and for Lne fm lntenance of all tnproven enta Iona tructed ins rounder -2- ' OtV ante the mprovement Sp accepted for ntenance by the Clty, a ana ne improve went ]ecurlty provided Here cv i:n ana11 De releap ed DlfOrp ucn eclp CdnDp Iln ie]] Ot11e r41ae prOVl]eJ and an [nort2ld Dy the City Council oC the Clty. lY. Th1a agra<ment ]nail not mrm cote un cvl the ` Od In Cenan<e gYafanC« f1 C'/ nGr<Sf1a (C2f 4<9CrlD od na] l re le a]ed Dy the C1cy, or until a nev agree„-.ant tPgecher vith ene required :mDfovemeet ] curt [y hap Deen auDni ttad to the Ci[y Dy a mcc<]aor co the Herein naaed, ana Dy ~.uu Pn of the C:cy Council ]a me Dap Deen accepted, and Wis agreeme nc and the lmFrovemen[ ]ecur S[y mere [or Dap Deen re1<aaed. I5. Tne .eDravement pecurlty to turn ipn ee Dy the Oev-1<per van tnta agree menc ]Dell co n]v,t ..• (a llo'u ng sae pha ll be to a (orm ace<ptatla by th< 4 :y da orneye R. Tp pecure faithful perfmrmaac> <C agree.m en [. ~ I. A Dond or Donda Dy one cr mor! duly au chortzed corporate puretlea tDe and ontent spec lfled Dy Government C<ue Section D5YDq,l. 2. An Improvement Secu n ty instrunen[ In the Cora ana cantene ppeclf led Oy cne hey Attorney. 3. A d<DOrit v1tD the City of m nay a negotiable Dond> e( CDe kind approved for securing depm lta mf public nenlm. g. To pecu re laDOrerp and ma ten almc~: I. A Dond or Donda Dy e e duly aucherized A or corporate pure tl en :n cne fore and emncenc spec lfled Dy Government Code Seccton 66Y9g.1. 2. An Improvement Security In acrumenc in cne form • and cen[ent apeC if led D') cne Ctty Attorney. 3• A de poalc v ah Ctty of oney o negotla Dle Dane] mf cne gtne app re ved ror < ma ring C. A teen dlpoa i[ vl[h the Cl[y co quarantee payment Dy tDe Developer Co CDe eng i.:eer or au rvey or vn ope certlflcate aDPea rp upon [Dq Ftnal Map for the >etting of all boundary, lot corner, and atreec centerline monumenm and for fu ro caning centerline tie note] to cne Ct[y. TDC a cant of [ne depma e may De any amount carclhpJ by cne engineer or surveyor as ac<eDtaD le payment to full: or, if no •alY< 1! aubni ttea, tnp Ca9n Dp-d ]Dill Dp as andVn an LD< Con rtructlon and Bond Ept Smote cmnealmed Here ln. 5aia coon depoplt nay De refunded p] goon ap Drode- dure D<rml[a after receipt Dy [ne Ll[y of the centerllnp tie notes ana vrttten sap uranee oC payment In full from rile engineer mr au rv ey or. D. the req aired Donda and CDe principal anounta thereat are pet fortD on page 6 pf thta agr cement. 16. iDa Devsloper varran to that the imp rove manta deacriDed in enlp a8reement anali De free from defects In mater gala add vork man]hip. Any and all p<r[ione of the lmDrove- nenGe found td De detective vltn Sn one (1) year (olloving [De data on vh1eD ene imp rovementa ere accepted Dy CDe CILy obeli De repaired or replaced Dy DeveloPer free of all cne rgm to the Cl ry. in! Developer ana 11 fu rn L]n a maintenance guarantee sec urlty In m equal Lo ten percent (10i) of the conpeructlon eatlaa to or 7200 m00, vhienever to greaten to secure the hltDful per (orman<e of Otve loper'a obligor long a] ace<r[D ed In to la para- graDn, Tne malnten•nce guaran te• ]ecurlty anall alpo aecur• the • fal to (cal pert orma nap Oy the Developer of any ebllgatimn of the _d_ a' ~~ ~ Oeve lODer eo do spe<tflee vork vien espeCC cC any park vay avnt<nance a men[ aia:ric:. an ee ene yen ea ..a ve been acoeDted and a emalnten ante guarantee eyr apes been, ccep tee Dy the Cvty, ene pcner improve nen: aecuri [e dCa criDetl aan :his a greemen[ may De released prOVidee that O _._ ocnervi:e u:hariCld by Lnt $Jtltl :vlalOn Yiap qC[ an.11 .I f. ye a3 ]p L1aCab 1< ~ :/ pr]in anse. li. That the Developer ana 11 cake Out and ma Inca in ouch DuDl:c IlaDiltty and DrpDe r:Y damage shad DrotC O[ him and any contractor auDC On[ra etar]aperformieg vork cove retl by Lh is agree ¢<nc from0 clatma [or property damagm vh tch gay a ris! Deea me at [he na CUre Of [he work or from operatlOna under t hea ag re aen :, vhether ]CCh op era[]ons Ce / v.velf or Dy any contractor or auecOncracLer, or anyone Cvrecay SOd erectly e Cployed Dy ]a ld Der]on], even :hough ]uch ]ama3es De no: Causes Dy Che seglagenc< of Che Developer ny n[rac cor uDCOn tractor or anyen< employed Dy aeC roe ra one CO the pup Lc IiaDe Lty and property dama8e loan ranee anaa list ch< Clcy as aOdi:onal insured and dlrec ay DrCeecc cF.e Cicy, ice Orrice ra, agents an] employees, as yell as ene Devs:ope r, nia contraC[ora and his auDCpd[rac COra, and all insuraeC! pOi:c i<a Laa ued D!reandlr ahdll a0 aLd [<. T11< mtnlmYm dmOUnL] O( 9uC 11 1naYfi nC! a hall be as fOlloVa; A. Contractor's 11aDlliGy lnaurance provldleg DOdlly LnJUry Of des en 11dElllty 1{GlC9 Of nOt 1<aa Lhd 3300,000 far each D<raon ene 31,000,000 for each • accldenL or Occurrence, and property ea Gage lla D11- ity 11mStaocf net le]] than 3100,000 Cor <dCh acCl- dent or urrence xith an aggregate limit of C • 2250,000 for Claims vh SCD may arise f m [he opera- tfona of the Deve lop m~ ld [he performance of [hC ark here In prov Seee. B. Autemehlle 11aDllicy lm ura nee cover log all vehl0lea used In the performance of thts agreement providing Oodlly In Jury 1faDl tl cy Ilmita of no[ leas Chan 2200,000 tar eaen person and 2300, D00 fer each ace tdent CccvrrenCC, ene Dreperey damage r 11aDtltcy Ilml b of not le ]] chdp 350~0p0 Cor each acetdent or Occurrence, Vtch an aggregaL• of na[ lean than 2100,000 VOSCh may df tae fr Om [ha opara- Clona of the Developer or hie CCmtrvctar 1v Derfo rvln8 Lh< xork prOVld ed for he reap. 1g. Thrt OafOre the execution of eh la agreemene, the Oeve Loper shall file vleh Che Clty a CerttClca to or cerclffcatea of Sn]ura nca Covering the aDeclfled Insure nca. Each uCh a cere if tea to aha ll hear an endCraeme nt prec lud ln6 the cancellations, yr reduction In Coverage of any policy ev idencea Dy au ch cert if tca:a, Oefore the ex plra cton of thvrty (301 days after the Clty shwa nave reCe tved notvf ica[lOn Dy reglsLered malt frog the tvaurance Carrier. A] ev Silence of and eratand log the pro vlalona ten to 4ne0 Pere ln, and Of intent cp comply Vttt1 as me, the $uDd lv ider has ]u0 m3 t: ee the folioving de acrlbad LmDrovemen[ ae curlty, and has affixed hfe slgna cure he reco: `.J -V- • dz ~ PAIZNPBL PeRPOfl NANCE Pr SacvDat „moon c: Phase I S1Y1 ,i00 .OJ Phase tI tYR,20D .cL Phase III 252, Y00.00 Phase IV 90,200.09 Phase V 650,6CG. :L NATEpIAL AND LABOR PATMENT Pr:cc:; ~: ,,.w :n,. P hose [ 3 10,RSG.d3 Phase II iV,IG0.00 Pnase ::I t26,200.c0 Phase :'! u5,IC0.C0 Pease V 325,300.60 LIStl DEPOS It MONBMENTALIOY 2rvnc :'v ~= Amodac: N/A MAZNteNANCe DDAPANSEE Pr lncapa: Anoun c: IOS of Fa StDful Performs nee Bone dq reaene i0 BB POSSBD Pfl ZOO iO gCCEPtANCE OS SNE C[ii • Ztl NttN6 SS XBREOP, tDe parelea Dere co have c see these • preYen[a to Da duly eaecu[ed dnd aek no oleo qed aaklth all fOr¢a lit laa re9olred Oy lax on tl:e date] aeC fOf [h opp0ii to ch¢lr a18 na [urea. Date Oc to her I6 1984 Dy ,Oe veloper 5lsx na :.: r^ CN1 StMN BEVE LOYMENi f.ORPO UTiION, a California Co rnora [i nn P ^ f.p ted-~~\ Py: Marta Mort', Pres men[ Date pt' - '^ ~ ,D<eeloper lgnaeu re Pr Sneed Accepted: Llty of poncho Cuc akanga, Caltfornla A Monte teal Lo rperaeton By: Mayor Att ea t: Clty Clerk /., _~ Approved: / /~%a DBPELOPBp~S SZGMAZORB MOST B8 MOT ARI2ED • -5- ~ ~~ • • CITS OP AANCIIO COCAMOHCA CONSTflUCT ION ESiIMATH ENCflOACID4Jfr PERMIr FFP SCIIEOULE For [aDroveaen[ oC Inproveaent of Pnaae I ~ ' FLLe Re Yerence: :A 9Y+1 5 11509 Ct:y C+g. N<. 'Cl S Pnaae I) NOTB: Daea not lnclode currevt !ee fe r wrlting perva[ or paveeent aepm[b. CONSTPDCT:D4 COSS E9ta"A T'E ITC4 CJANTI:Y l:It 'J'I IT COST J AGL V' P.C.C. Grm - 12" C. F. P.C. `. [ere - 3" &F. 2250 L.F. 5. 00 1j,5 ^,O. dG P.C.C. Gra on iy o^ C. F. A.C. ?ern iJ2J0 e:n.) 80 r. 50 350. ;0 Y" P.C. c. 5: deva l[ t5C0 S.F. L ?5 2,5).5. .0 6^ Dn ve Appnacn 390Y S. F. 2. 10 0,13'~ ~0 B" P.C.C. Croaa Geezer 2176 3.f'. 2. SD 5JIY0 , 00 Scree Ex<avatvon 3500 C.Y. 3~ OO 10 „OG. 00 IoD ar[<tl E¢pdnKmen[ Preparat von of Sutgnde Y0660 S.F. 0. 15 7,299. 00 Crashed A;gregate 0aae (per Sn. [hlck) YB660 S.t'. 0. 16 7,785. 00 A.C. (aver 1300 tom) A.C. (900 ce 1300 Bona) 1077 Ton 30. 00 32,310. 00 A.C. (unacr 500 [0 900 Iona) A.C. (vnaer 500 tone) Pa tnh A.C. (trench) • 1^ [n tcK A.C. Ove rlaY Si e2Y R.F. Ad]u at xwer aanho le tx gratle 0. 30 17.227. 00 Ad}s r clean out to graae AdJ"uc wa to va lvee to grade 5 EA. SO LO 250 .00 Stroec L:;h to 6 EA. 1500 . 00 9.000 .0 Scree[ Svgna Y t'A. 2GL. CO "90 .00 5ereee Tre<a flemoval o! A. C, Pavemen[ 1766Y S. F. 0. 35 6,182 .00 Pa T1 ec [on 6 Poa [a 10 Ed. 35. DD 350 .00 Catch Baun 2 EA. 2500. 00 5,000 .00 Local Ce preen lon 2 EA. 1LOL. LO 2,000 .Oo CDYSI'AUCSiOq 0051 J12R.R25. G0 coNrlxcexa cosrs s u.e33. Do TOtAL COVSigUCTlOx 31 u1 eC 9. 0: FA ItNFUL PERFOAHANCE SUREti (1004) Slat,?C 0. 00 LABOR AND MATERIAL SECURITY (504) 3 70.^,50. 00 ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE •RESTOA At[04 /OEL INEAtION CASH DEPOSII (fl8FUN0ABLE) MONUMENTAT ION SU RETT (CASH) { I,B00 .05 aPurauan[ to Clt1 of NocM Ncuonga Mao lc lpal Code, Tl t le I, ChmDter 1. 0g, mdaptl~ Sen 8arogrd lno CouotY Cade Tlt lea, Ouptera 1-5, m raaN reatoratloo/dellneat loo dapoa It aN 11 Oe ode Drtor to Wuanca of m Pay lnecrlM Cana[root tan Permit. • -A- • ~ 4 a, .. • CIR OP RANCf10 CUCAMONf.A CONSYflUGTION ESTIMATE ENCROICIMENt PERMIT FEE SL:UEDULE For trpnvesent of: Improveoev of Ppase :I Ca ce: Coapu[ee LY: F tae E!feronce: Tfl 9V41 S I;eG9 C::y Owg, ;:o (PFa se ISi NOTE: Does mt lnplwee c ent fce for vrlttfy Dermit mr Davement depose ta. LC.4STAU[t!SN COST ° _ _ IT`-.Y GCAa:::? :JS- 3 aY:':9T P.C.C. L+rO - :2^ L.F. P.C. C. ca ra-d ^c.F. 2x55 ~... St Y,730.GC P.0.:. L'Jr0 an:y 6" C. F. A.L. sera U2C0 nmJ u^ P.C.C. Si eewaik 5635 9,968.00 6" Crave Ap proacn Y295 ... F. 9,022.:0 B^ P.C.C. Crpsa Cutter Str!!t Excavac wn 2xb¢ C.T. 7,38fi.W Iapart ee Eaaanka<nt Prepare a on of SuOgraee 30396 S.F. Y,559.00 Crmnee Aderega to Base (Der m. tntOkl 30396 a.:. 3,SYB.00 A.C. (over 1300 tonal A.C. (9G0 eo 1300 tone) A.C. (ur.e!r ',00 to 900 Iona) 570 C.,a 25,650.00 A.L. (urA<r 500 cons) Po ttS A.C. (VencH) • t^ to lck A.C. Overlay Ae lu s: zeuer eanhole to grade • Ae;v ze sever clean out m graee AC tvs: va :cr valves to grace 5[reec v Horn n 16,500.00 Strrt Stgna 2 ~•~. Y00.00 Streec ire!e I+a nnoie (rype Aa) t EA, I, 1DD.GD Junct inn Str uc eu re B I EA. 650. C0 IB• flCP Y5 - 1,350.00 27• ACP 39 L•F, i,B7B.00 30^ PCP 2u3 1..2. 9,120.00 36^ A[P 51 L.F. 2,VVB.00 Caren Baa to N + i' 1 Ed. 1,500.00 CaLen Bas In V W~ 1 EA. A,500.00 Outle[ Structure N Y~ I EA. 2.500.00 Rlp Rap t6 Tan 736.00 Inlet gpran I EA. 10,000.00 LONSTAVCTI04 COOt It 3V,1u5.G0 LONtZ 40ENCY COSTS 13 1.75.00 TOTAL WNSTRUCIfON IYB S20,C0 FAITHFUL PEAFOAMANCE SUREIY (1004) w9 200.00 LABOR ANO HATERI AL SECURITY (S0f1 tY,100.00 ENC IIIEERINO SVSPECtIOY FEE sgESTORATZON/pfLINEATION CASH DEPOSIT (AEFVNOABLEI I~NUMENTATION gURE7Y (GASHI x.800,00 • aPurauant to Cit) o[ BuwNO CuoaAgmBR Nzm1m10a1 CaOe, SitN I, aza0ter 1.08, adoptln6 San parmarglm rmotY COOe Tlt lca, QYptem 1-5, • waN natora lion/dellnutlom Oepoalt aGall W udv Dr mr to lea0en0e mt h 6161neerlns CMat[0o tlov [ar•1L. -ba- • ~5 • • city OP AAxcxD cucuroacA CONSTAURION ESitHATE FJICRO•CW4]li PEAHti fEE SLIIEOULE For Lap nrenenc pR Improvement o! Phaee , Ca [e: Campu tea ty: File Pe R.r ecce: TP 9Y 41 4 t:b09 Ll:y uag. .IP. IPhaae Ittl xore: We! cot mmoae eurrene ree ror vrlelmg permit or pavement acpw:U. CC`ISTPUCT:LN COSt EST J"..4TE T='1 yUAaT[SY ____ is lT :JST S 0.yGJl:' P.C.C. Lurp - :2" C. F. P.L.L. Curo - x" C.F. 3047 ~... 23,002.00 F.C.C. Caro only e" FF. A.C. c (5200 m n,7 u^ P. cec~ iifevalk 7336 - 12,93'3•x0 fi" ^- APDraaph 4292 S. F. t7. +t3.00 B^ P.C.C. :r05! G'.ICef 1024 - 4,560.00 streee E vae:Gn 3856 e.x. lE tt,56x.00 imp0r[ea ae ankm_nt Prepaauon or Sungraae 73Y 01 I1 ,OIO AO Crusn ca ABa rega to Rale (Der ln. :h 1c4 73401 - q, dOB.00 A.C. (over 1300 epm) 1376 fin 27,520.00 A.C. (900 t0 t3OO [0na) A.C. iavter 500 to 900 tone) Pa [cn A.C. (:re nenl AG J~.:a[ s r ,tdnhOle LO grace • Af.Jast sever etcan out to grace Aa taa; va [er valvm [a grace • 5[ree[ L:3"p 1V Eq. 21,000.00 0[rce[ St ins fi EA. 1,200.00 $t ree[ i ee9 r Ju nc[mp S true LUre Type x 2 EA. 1.300.00 Junction G:ruc cure Ty De C i I, 700.L0 Ma nnole ~ 2 ' 3,YOC.CO Conc. m::ar 6 Z, ]00.00 IB^ PCP V9 L~F. I, Y]0.00 2V" flLP YOY L.F. 1u,5YY.00 IB^ Cep (Vleh Plug) ] L.F. t5B.0O 36" RCP 02B L.F. 30, 1Y4,00 tl5" ACP 2VV L.F. 15.120.00 Gtch 9aatn x • 1tl' 2 L.F. 4,500.00 mecn Ba to 4 . 1Y' 2 L,F. 7,500.00 Local tie prey loe N • 1V~ 2 EA. 2,000 AO Lmml aeDreaalon N = 20' 2 Ed. 3r000.U0 30" CHP Plser 1 Ed, x00.00 Plp flab 39 ton 1,794.00 Jom e![s[ A.C. 33 L.F. 82.00 P.e co ve ea rr lcaee 33 L.F. 190..)0 CONSTPUCIION COLT S22).+tt,OG CONTI4CEIICY CGSTS 3 22.942.00 TOtAL CONSTAUCTtON 725:.359.:0 FAITHFUL PERFOAHANCE SUAEtY (IOOS) 5252.~~00.00 LABOR AND MATERIAL SEWAtTY (SOS) S12E. M0.00 ENC INFERS NC IN$PELtI ON FEE •ALTOPAT SON/OELtNEATtOp LASH OEPOSti • (PEFUNDABLE) MONUMENTATION SUAET2 (CAStl) •aurlwmt W Cltt of x•met0 Cxc•rn8a Nlm lel wl Coa•, Tltle I, CNDtar 1.OB, mOODtInB Sa Mrrrd leo Coumy Coati tltlea, Ouptera 1-5, • rJaN rmatar•tlw/amllw•tlm aewslt eR•11 Pm ra• prlw W bau•ncm of r ~xlw•rIn Camatr[u tlaa ParLL t. /1~ ~ • • CITS CF 9.ANLHD CVC :4ONC..I LONETPUCTIOH ESTIY.ITE QlCflOACUIU:NT PENtIT FEE DLIIEGULE For Improvement of: ieD rovenent of PPa d- " Dace: caD~ted ty:_ - Fvle i!fe ren ce: Td ?YYi f I:e'J9 Lay 0x4• Nm. (POase tJl NOTg: Doea not Snctude current tee tar xrlting permit or parevent depov ta. CO;ISTP VCTTINi COST 9. ' IT:4 OII ANT L-Y - DN!; f R:!O:1 :T P.C.G. Curb - 12" C. F. P.C.C. Curti - B" 6F. 1d]9 L.F. 11,259. 00 P.C.C. L,.rD only d^ L.F. A.L. Bera (5200 mn.) V^ P.C.C. Sv dead lx 2181 Y,B']. CO 6^ Or re App rca el uVhu _.:. 9,3]V. OD d• P.C.C. E a Gutter S: rce: Eacavauon 1982 6'!. 5,64fi . 00 Iopmr:ed Emtankmenc PttDa: at mn mt Euegrade 2Bi22 S. F. V, 300. DO Crusned Aggregate Baae (Der Sn. CD tck) 28122 ~... 3, YY]. OD A.C. (over 1300 tone) A.C. 1900 tm 1300 :om) A.0. (under 500 tD 900 tons) 539 ..n 2Y,159 .J0 A.C. (under 9C0 tone) PateD A.C. (Crenen) • 1" [M1 tcN A.L. Overlay AE Jua: aexer mannmle to grade • AdJu at serer clean out to grade AO Just va ter va lvea to grade Street Lignta i £A. ID,BC0 .00 S: rte.[ Slgne 1 :.^. 200 .00 St rest Tre ea Pa rA vay La ndaeape and Irclgat ton 36" PCP fYE L.F. 7,105 .00 Remove Cevp. Inlet and Jo1nt I.. S. 1,000 .00 CONSTP.uCTIOtI [OS; td 1 .9 tlD.0O WNTINCENCS COSTS f 8.198.00 TOTAL LONSTAVCTSON 570.']9.90 FAITIIFUL PERFOPNANCE EUPETT (100T) 60.200.00 LABOfl AND HATE AI AC EECVflITY (504) IN 5.100.00 ENC INEE PING INSPECTION FEE aPESTOPAT30N/DELINEATION CASN DEPOSIT (PEFUNDABLE) MONUMENTfStOll SU AELY (GASH) aPUrauant to Clty ey IWeDO acaavnga Nunle teal Cotle, Rtle I, tlupter L OB, adopt tng San Beroaretmo County Cade ilt lea, CTUpte ra 1-9, a coat, rotmra tloe/dellneattom Aapoa It alull De mdc Drt or to laauance o[ >n Aglneer lfy Comtruo tlon Perett. -hc- ~ / CiTT OF AANL110 NC.ANONr,A CONS1flOCTION EST [HATE 8NLp0\CVIff.NT PEAlAIt FEE SLIIECULE Far Iupnvemen: o(: I]p revs-enc oT Phese 'J _ e::e Ee Cerence: TA purl t '~ !L9 Ct!y va;. IiO- -_ (Posse NS NQTE: poet not lnc luxe a ent fee for uric Tog Dena or pavement Aepm ttp. CONS: PUQ:04 COST TEY CJn'ITI:: ~ _ 5 d~mJ'i: • P.C.L. Cub - 12" 0.F. P.L.L. L,,rb - s^ c.F. P.L.L. :: rb enly 6" 0.F. A.C. Zero 11200 ¢inJ N" o Sl:eva l'k 6" " e Approach d^ P.6. ~. Lr va Latter Pre pa ra:icn or 5ubgrede A.C. '. r 1300 tons) A.C. (94D to 1)00 Cpna? A.0. (under 500 to 900 tons) Pa tcb A. L, i[rencD) 1" !n tck A.C. Overlay 2Y^ Pvpe ALP Storm Oralp int?t $[f'JC GUf[ - Mdr old IIt aE'Jdll outlet Pad Ov::c; Spec lal f4d" diame:ar) 50^c :at Strue [arc - slope protect on s the Oran Conn cc tv pn or 5.0. Nmd bal4 (uarpadl far out:at AubO le - sups C:car:n; Tracxo :dal Channel Pec!angu lar'Cnannel p.C. Boa Culvert 6-font nldh main lipk fence u0 - 60. 00 2, YOO.Oo 1 12,000. LO 12,000.00 1 I - - Ii ,000. 3,140. CO 00 17,00040 3,500.40 Y88 - IO. CO Y, 800.04 • 2 2,SL0. 00 5,400.40 2 Ed. I,JG0. 00 2,000.00 I EA. 6,a C0. tp fi,4C 4. o0 1192 S.F. 5- 50 6„56.00 1 20,000. 00 28,000,40 1695 L.F. 172. 40 291,SY0 ,00 Y65 - 235. tV 109.d0Y ,00 125 l.'. T00. 0o 87.500.00 1915 •..-. 9. 00 15,324.00 LAet57AUCTIOq LASS 1591 500.00 CONT INGENCT COSTS 3 59.:`.0.00 TOTAL CONSTAUCTI09 1550 559.00 FAtTXFVL PEAFOpMANLE SUAETY (1004) 1650 SCO AO LABOR AND NAtEBIAL sECUptTY (SOS) 4125.?00.00 ENOINEEP INC IN SPELT IOH FEE r AE52OPAS ION/DELINEATION CASN DEPOSIT (pEFUNDABLE) MONUMEYt ATiON SU9ETT (CASNI aPUrauant to CSy oP Aaaceo Oacamonp Mloiclpal Cade, Tltle I, CAapter 1.09, adopt ln8 San 9ern\rdlno fnuntT Coda iltlem, CDaptera 1-9, a raaN reatoratlon/dellneat lan dtDOalt eN ll to ede pr for to IeaWnce of an Eng loser ln8 Cmuntrvmtlmm Per~lt. •Bd- • P V • 1 ~~ ~y ~ _ ,, ~~ • i REInRUxsenexr AcneEnexr POfl PLANNED DRAINAGE PACILITI CONSTRUCTION N0. 2 TNIS AOREEnENT, mate ant entered iota thi9 day y 193 , by and to bw e°,^, the CiT'1 GF FAY ~iiO GJCAN0;10 A. Caiitornia, a mun!cipal dnrperatiOn, hereinafter called "Ct ty•' and Cr!smar Ce'+^:-pment Do rporatiOn, ref errCd to a9 "Developer", provides: HISNESS ETH wNEPEAS, In th¢ OF(nlon Of Che City is nece9s ary Chub planned drainage !sell files De construe Led tOr the proper dralLage of Developer's development described a9: 7PACT5 9V41 ANO 1160 i; a^.d NHEPEAS, Che Developer, at Che Developer's Own expense will install the planned drainage [ac::i Ctea hereinaftef dese tired, and: xHEfl EAS, the cost of coon true ling the plan r,ed draAnage [utilities hereinafter described will ex OeeO the planned drainage taci:ities fee, wN ch w/ll De Da ya Dle with respent to the dev_iop.cent under the provisions of City Ordinance NO. 75, and, wHE AEAS, Section g of CSty Ord l.nan re `i0. 75 provides: "SECTION 8: C t 'i b D elsr^^ and Peimbur9ement. • • Mhenever the coomtruc Clon of planners drainage fac4lltles is nscessary far the proper draica qe of a aubd,visiOn, the CSty say require the subdivider to cone tract such fat tltti es wiLD c red:t being glv en by tha City [Oward any fCe payment regal red by this Drd lnance. If the cost of such cbOS true lion exc eed9 the tee which would otDerulae De payable Nlth re sDeN Lo the 9ubd IV191on, tYe Gay Counctl may, at its disc r'et/on, enter Into a reimbu r9ement agreement with the developer. In tDe event a rllmbu r9 ClaenL dgr«mCnt i9 ¢nter2d SntO~ r¢I.T.bnr9Emr 1L 9i1a 11 bC made Oniy afCef Li1C (Pe r<Qalr<d Dy Ch l9 OrdlddnCC i9 C011 eC L8d in cunneccion Nlth a aubd ivlslOn or deve Lopmont On other property in the area encempa aced by CDe reimburse ment bounds rlas described 1n the rliIDbOr9CminL dxrC¢IDIpL. Tt18 Ed 919 Of rliNnur9Cmemt )hall De the developer's actual cost of Construction of the planned drainage faclLltlea. The term of a re lmburaement agreement shall nJt C%Ceed GCn (iD) yid r9." NOw, THE PEFOfl E, the parties hereto agree as [allows: 1, TDe Developer will, and at Developer's ours expense, forty Sh all laDOr: equipment and ma Ceria 1, and pay all costs lnc:de nt to [he instal latlon In accordance with Diane and specifications approved Dy the Clty Engineer of CDe City, Lhe foiiOwing planned drainage !acillties: The Alta Loma Channel contlgunud Co the nest boundary of Tracts 9441 and i160) from tl'~e Alta Loma Ba)Ina to the north aide n[ w:laon Avenue, lncludlg box culvert cro9a+ng Of Wilson Avenue. • 30 • 2. Installation of said o nned dru sate facia ties shall • be ce nple cetl vn mnfor na nee wvth theip:cv ision cf the sued u•isico agreecent far Trects 11609 and 9.J1. J. The City Engineer and County Flood Control Enq vneer s ball ins pecc and test the plan red Era inaye feu lc ues, and of ter any defvc veiny discovered by said Eng vneer has been corrected by Cevelepe:, City man 'grit ten approval and accepca nee f ~ Che San 3e [na rd ino C ccy Flood Conc:ol Distn<t sEali re tease se<un t~ oeld to secure co nst ^c[ion of sa vd facile ues. 4. Cicy and County shat: not be resco rs:ble for any Icss or damage co said planned drat ra ge Eaci L Cies prior to their ace a?csnce by County Flood Centrol pistnct. Deve to per hereby guava ncees and warrants said planned drainage Eacilvues for a period of one fll year folio oo cg the cempletion and acceptance the reef agavn st an't deEec u':e ao[k o[ la bo[ done, ar de Eec true ma ce eels Ea rnv shed. 5. Developer shall protect, indemr¢Ey and save ha rcl ess City and County Flmd Con crol Distract from and aqa insc any and all clu ms, de nand s, and causes of action of any ca cure whatsoever, and any expense incident to defense by Cicy and Coun cy Flood Conerol O sscr ice of any such demand or action far im, ury to or death of persons or loss of or damage to property occurs nq on Developer's develo pmenc, or in any manner gloving out of or cossetted with Developer's cons^uc- ticn, repair and maintenance of [he planned drainage facilities described her_i n, or m any canner growing out of or connected with any defimencp , in wcrkma nship Or material furnished in cennec uon vv th cons truc[ic n, mince wnce or repair of said planned tlraina ge Eac vii ties. 6. City hereby agrees that in conslde ration of Developer's irs mile uon of said planned dra usage and scre_c facilities, CS ev • wail not assess Develo pets Me fees leveed under the provisions of Ordinances Ji and 61 ac i suance of building permvcs Eor the sub;ect • tra rs. ]. Cicy hereby agrees that in conside ra uon of Developers inzta llac von of said planned drainage and street facilities, City will in con`. a:manne wiM conditions of approval Eor Pa mel Map 6627 make papmenc to the Developer drainage Eees co elected under the previsions of Ordinance ]i for development of lands on Parcel one of se vd parcel map vetch a 60 days of collection of said fees. B. For the amount Mat the actual cost of cons t[uc lion of said planned drainage facilities exceeds the fees which developer, but far pa ragraph 6 hereof, would De [equiied to pay under the provssions of ordananres 75 and 61, which said excess amount is herei na[eer referred co as the "original reimhursement sum" the City shall reim- burse Developer, ezc lusive of the pmvis von of Paragraph ] hereof, only as and when fees are collected and e[ Ordinance eo. 76 and only according to the formula Aer¢inaf ter des<rlb ed. Amounts to be reim- bursed to Developer shall be determined as follows: A. Eollawing completion o[ construction Me Developer shall submit all cc at da ca to the City Enginee[. The City Engineer shall Chen de<e rmine Me actual cost of construction, and such de corm ins cion s ha ii be final fACtaal costs shell include applicable design and c anscnm uon, eng ineerl ng, surveying, inspection the rges levied by the Gfy and County Flood Conerol Cis tr is c, all eLgi ble contiacc costs and Dcnd premiums not to ezc¢ed 1\ of the Channel Cans trot non Contract amount. B. Annually, at ehe end eE each fiscal year, the Cicy shalt set aside into a "planned drainage [elm bu rsemenc fund" coven ty-five percent (2511 of all Eees rollec ted during Me fiscal yea[ under the p rove sio ns of Ordinance No. 75. C. Tha Developer shall be eliq lble to share In Che plan ned• drainage reimbursement Eund commencing with the fiscal yeas which Ma planned drainage facilities are nubs cancvally comple ced as de cermined by ch¢ Cicy Enginee[. ~l D. if the De velopcr is el:yibl¢ r r. in the planned d ra ini,c [¢rmbursement EonJ, [h ¢n oat ,.I ;'.a 121 on [ha af!e[ the •: c.l of such ff seal year, the City sF.ali p~; t.. ...;doper, fra r. t".? a:~aunc set aside in ehe planned dratna~ls r_. ^• , .,ursr.¢nt Fs nd, a ~~ Erac e~onal sha [¢ [hers:: dete:ninetl as foll.r. s lil The numerator shall Ec v.c ~ - nal re:^bursere^~. r cF.e Develope[ and [he denominator cn 1:~: ve total of [he r rs or i:n ~al etmbursement sums Eor all Develops .r.v sr? eligible to slm re :r. ;hc Plann¢J drainage rm mtnrscnc::t L.r " ,.,. ;aid ~~.•,: r. fiscal ~ q. till of Developer's right en r =-._ c Eereund er shall cease as of the entl of clue fiscal year !`~.li nn r I1G1 years nftec [IYa [fiscal year In which [he Develnpr.r nt ::cane eligible fa[ rcrmmrsemen: hereunder, whether or not [ul:y,, t... 1G. Nothing In [his agreement shall enttile Developer to re in L,irsemcnc of a sum in eacezs of the or bJvnal r_...aurseme nc sum. I1. :.mounts payable to Deve Soper 1:¢;vander shall hear late rest ac tl~e race of ten pe ttent per year cal ca lat.:i .:.. :r.e ou cs to ad u,q balance from tine disbu[sed to time race wml. 12. Payments may be marled to Cevc lcwcr ac the following address, 2120 Ni lshi re Boulevard Suite 2D0 Santa Ham ca, California ?'.:E4 U. Developer may changt the matt ay aJJ cuss by yr it[en no uCC J¢live[ed to the Clty Clerk. • li. Pights to relmbursemenc due and e: tots agreement may he • aszia:ed after wn Cten no Clce co the city by U', n, holler cF such n ghts as shaven Ey the rece[ds of the City. 5.. u'. ass:gnme nt shall only Le offer uve only with respect to payments heron inq due and pa •, solo more than thirty ~)GI days after rettip: by Ctty cE written no rice of s.:ch asalgnment. City sha 11 not Ee ray r. rrd to davlde any pay nerve to be made hereunder. In the even[ is app ca rs from the records of Glue Coy tlmt more than one Ilj person halls ~ eight to payment here undeq the Cl[y may deliver the full payment [n any one of such per sane and such payment shall be deemed pay-^.nt to all. l9. As used in this agreement, :he term "Ordl wore No. 75 s 61" find odes any ordinance amending or modily rnq Ordinances No. t5 L 61 and any ordinance adopted hereaEte< which covers <he same or vm LLar sublecc matte[ and la intended to replxe Ord: no nc es No. 75 6 61. 16. The Clty reserves the r/q h[ to a[ nny rime increase ar derrcasu Ghe tees payable under ordinances ^o. ii 6 6l. lt. 1( the fee established by ordinances Vo. 19 s 61 are hereiuaECnr dad aced Invalid or unenf or ceahl e, or collet clan che[eof is oth erwrse precluded by law, all Developer's nghts to r¢im horsemen[ her cu n,:ar shall Imm¢d Sate ly cease and cermtna te. 19. This agreement shall be lnterp: rated area rding eo the laws of cl.o State of Callfor nla. Thla document o;nta ins ehe entire agreennnc Le tw¢en [he paroles wieh reap etc co the snb)¢ct ma tree hereof. Thts ., pecrte nt canna[ be modi [led eke opt by an agrer..m ant in wrl Clog, aiyr.¢J by the party ega lose wham ch¢ en[orcemene of any waiver, cha nqe, modifies clan or dlwharge le eo ught. SuEjec[ to any provlalo na he tern to the contrary, [hie agreemen! shall in all respects bind, anJ \n::(C t0 [hC b[neElt n(, the 11¢lrar CNCrll cur:: adltn l9 [Cd [O C9, sec acs mars and assigns df each o[ [he par cles. • J ... .. ~~ - ~ .~/farf RESOLUTION N0. E02~-Z0-OMt- - " ~~~~~ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO • CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 9441 AND TRACT 11609 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract 9441 and Tract 11609 cons istinp of 84 lots, submitted by Crismar Development, Subdivider, located south of Wilson Avenue, west of Hermosa Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with thr_ requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite Lo approval of the final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. Th a[ said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and • • 2, That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and PASSED, APPROVED, and ADDPTEC this 20th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on a s, ayor ATTEST: every A. ut a et, ,ty erk jaa ?~ ~~ RESOLUTION NO.--E^~O-~T :' `' ~%`F, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO • CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FROM CRISMAR DEVELOPMENT FOR TRACT 9441 RND TRACT 11604 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement executed by Crismar Development as developers, for the installation of storm drain facilities to be constructed for orooer drainage of Developer's deveiooment described as Tract 9441 and Tract 11609, generally located south of Wilson gvenue, west of Hermosa Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Developer, at Oevelooer's own expense, will install the planned drainage facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED 6y the Citv Council of the r, ity of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same are hereby approved and the t4ayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1985. AYES: • NOES: • ABSENT: on i e s, ayor ATTEST: every u e et, i y er ,~aa • ~`I w • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GUCwMp STAFF REPORT ~~' '~~., ., Fi U Ij> DATE: 70: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: February 20, 1985 - 79T City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Barbara Kr all, Engineer Technician gpproval of Bonds and Agreement for D.R. 84-18 located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south side of 7th Street submitted by Martin Jaska Development Review 84-18 was approved by Planning Commission on July 30, 1984, for the development of an industrial building on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south side of 8th Street. Martin Jaska has submitted bonds and an agreement to guarantee the constructfon of 1th Street in the following amounts: Faithful Performance eond .................$13,981.00 Labor and Material Bond .......... .. .......E36,990.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the hoods and agreement and authorizing the Mayor and Lity Clerk to sign same. gq~pRctfully suglnitted, LB~BK: ko Attachments C , J ~s LITY OF AAXCHp LOLAMOXGA INPq OYEMEHT AGAEEMENi FOR Oe ve lopaenv P.e view 84-18 KY"vlr dLL YEY BY THESE PAESEJ?5: Tn a[ :r ~s agreement is made sad entered into, in conformance xi'n :he pro'n ;,ores of the Mumc~pa t Lode and Regal ai ions of ;he City of Aanc F.p Cucampnga, State of Lals Porni a, a munic:o al corpora :+pn, here'~naf ter refer-- ed Ip " as the Lity, by and be bxeen said Ci(y ar and in J. Jaska, Ir.c. hereinafter rer erred to as free seve .ape•. TNni, aNEAEAS: sold ;evelpper deli-es :o dev_'op ^ert atn rest prcper:y 1n 551d „i;y lpc ated on ease s: de of drehib old Ave., south st Ce of ]th BLreet ; and HHE9Ed5, sa'd C. ty has es;abiis'ned certain requirements to be not by said Deve :oper as prerequts~:e to granting of final approval; and NH EAEAS, the execu t+on of this ogre emen[ and posting of impro vemen[ secure ty as heretnaf ter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to 6e equivalent to Drior co mpte[ipn of sold requirements for the purpose of securing sold approval, N OH, THEA Ef 7A ;, i[ is hereby agreed by and be Geen [he L icy and ;ho pevel oper as folly x;: • I, The Developer hereby agrees (o co rest ruct a( tlevelopor's expense all imprpve-ev[z desc^i bed pre page a hereof • within I2 mon(ns from the date he regf. 2. This a9r_e^Ient sh al' be effec:ivo qn the data of Me resol u[t on of the Council u` said Li ty ap0rpvsng [his agreement. This agreement shall Se in default pre the day follow- ing the first anniversary date pf sold approval unless an exten- sion of time has been gr sn led by ;aid City as nereinaf ter provid- ed. 3. The peveloper may request add i[ional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less loan 30 days prior to Me default date, and including a Sta[em ent of ctrcumst anc ei of necessity for additional time. In cpnsidera- ti0n of such request, the Lity reserves the right to revfen the ~, Orovi signs hereof, including construction standards, rust estimate, and ;uff iciency of th¢ improvement security, and tq require adJusemen[s thereto when warranted by subi[ant tai changes t here .n. 4. (f tree Oevelo per faits or neglects tq comply with the provisions o/ this agreement, the City sh ail have the right dt dny tim! to CdllSe sdid DraviSipns tp be cpmplCied by dny Idw- ful means, and th ereuDOn [o recover from sdid Developer and/or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing, 5. Construction permits shall be obCai reed by the Devel- oper from Me oif ice of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the Dubl is right-of-way, and the developer shall conduct such work In full compliance with the regal a(ions contained (herein, Non-compliance may result in stopping of the work by the [ Ry, and assessment of [he penalties Dr ov ide d. 6. Dublfc right-of-way lmprov ement work required shall be constructed in conformance with approved improvement Dl ores, Stand and Specifications and Standard Ora i • , w n gs and any special 'I- Q S, F., p. A., Rls., P.M„COD d1 `F- i o,e amendments Mere to, Construction shall include o t' r a for dr i a e a and/Or other inc]dental wD rk de?med recess art' 9 public safety. Errora Or ommizsians disov?rod dun ng construc- tion shall be corrected upo r. the direction of [he City Eng[neer. Revised work due CO Sald plan ^~odi`icalions Sn all be :ov?red by [he pro viztons of this agr?even: and se:ureO by Me surety cOVerir9 the art ginal planned eorxs. 7. Rork done within existing stye?[s sn all Se ditiAent- ly pursuer Co cem pl?[ipn; the C+[y snail have the right ro Complet2 day dnd ill wprk 10 :ne ?Vent ]f Jnjust :`i ed delay 'n compl?[i0n, and :o recJVer all cast dnd ? ?n s? in<v rretl from Me Dev01ap2r and/af n15 COnCr ac for by dry iLwf Jl nCa05. 9. The D?Ve1Jp?f Shal! ne fe5pan51 S1? for ~epldCemeO (, reloc a[tpns, Or rem ova: Of any cdaDOnen[ a` any i rigation water system in coon ict vita [h? re0u:red wor'. !o Me satisfaction of the Ci [y Engine?r and [he owner Of [ne xa[?r system. 9. The Developer shall be rez0onsihla for removal 01 all l0osa rack and other Debris from Che DuDl is riyh t-of-way. 10, Tne Developer shall plant and maintain parkway ire?s as directed by ere Community Development Director. L1. Tne improvement security [o be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion o! Me terms o/ this agreement Shall be subject t0 the approval of roe Litt' gttorne y. TTe prin- ciDa1 amount of said improvement security shall hat be less Lnen [he ampun[ shown: • • -2- • ~~ ~~ J n u FAITHFUL PERFO0.MANLE Type: Prin:ip al gmount $73,981.00 Have and addr=. ss pf suro [y: MATER IRL ANO LABOR Tyoe: pr;ncipal arovnt: $)6.990,00 -~~_,... .-,..---~ Hame and adores; pf surety: CASH BEPOSIT MON UMENTAiION . ...~,. -... _. Type: Prins pal amop nt: Name and atltl ress pf surety: TO eE POSTED PRIOR TO q[CEPTR NLE BY THE CITY [\ NITHE55 HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknorleege rich all formalities repaired by lar on the-dates set iarth opposite their signatures. i Oa c= 2/4/85 by ..~, a1a; :~-~.~ '----~,~i-ocer eigna [u re Roger M. Sask a, President MRB~E N, .1. SASKA, INC. • r Oa[e by~~1-.- v~. Developer • igr. .urT- e~- prt nted Ac ceptetl: City of qan cho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Cor poratipn 8Y~ Maypr At[e s[: ,//// aty err Ctt A orney DEVELOPER'S S[GNAT URE$ MUST BE MOTARIZED C I _7_ • 3~ • cilr nc npncno cpcAmDNG,A EML NEED ING OI YI SIO ""' N ES IMAFE OF COST ~I/OR ae<-le GATE . ~z _ss LOCA7EON a'h r . OFYELOPER e - o la EMG INFEq ~ssoa area rn ntn.ers (lYq 4V•a we. 9qf ODANTI TY UNIT ITEM PA ICE ANWNT e<e< L.F. L f P,C.C. curb _ 12• C.F. 2/' gutter 7.25 <9 . . L.F. P,[.C. curb - 0• C.F. 2a' gutter P.C.C. turn gnlY 6,00 a ° L.F. A.C. berm 5 50 u n < ? <ibe I S.E. /• P.C.O. sidewalk /,y0 1 75 -. iz S? t 5oe S.F. S F Or lve approach 8• P [ . z]° I __, . . Y C , .C. Cross 9u lter (Inc. curb) J, 0 ' 6~ o . . Street eacavatlm 1 ~ fi.<flp ? o 3 c.r. INPOrt ld lmpanknront 5520 $,F, preparation of SVbyrdd! 0;15 ~0 a~a x s_i_zo S.F. TON Crusned a9g, ease (per loan thick) 4" s 0.07= o at ~ ~s~ A.C. lover I7W tons) 27 00 r T 6 fOX A.C. 1900 to 1300 tans) , 75 W 3] TON A.C. (500 to 9W tans) . /5 W __ TLN A.C. (under SW tans) , 60 W 30 664 __ S.F. S.F, A.C. Patch A.C, (trench) . 0,55 ' __ S.F. 1• Nick A.C. overlay I, 75 0 J0 EA. EA. Adlast sewer manno le to grade Adlust i l . 250.Op i EA. Mr c ean out to grade AdJust t 150,W s EA. wa er valves to grade Street Iignts 75,Op ]5 5c 9 L.F. Narr tcadeS (Interst<. f500 min) 1000,00 1 W 5 0 0 • B6 ito L.F. S.f. 2 a 1• rldwpOd hlatltr pemoval o/ A Pavement C 1 75 5 t ] tt z L.F. , . gempwl of P.C.C. care OJS J 70 - _ L,F. Removal of A.C. DNm . n 3 EA. Street signs 2W W EA. Re/lectors and posts . 75 W zoo ~_ l.F. Concrete DIgcR wall 25 00 __ f.F. petaintny wail . 20 00 TON Aggregate Ease . 7 00 ~_ C.Y, Contract structures , 125 W --~" l.i, 10• qCP (2000 01 , 29 W __ L.F. 21• PCP (1500 01 , ]S.W L.F. 76• PCp (20W 01 19 00 L.F, t0^ qOP (12W D) , 76 W ~_ EA. Gtc[l Wain N /' 1000 OD EA. [atcN Eat in N 0• , 2900 00 EA. Catch basin N 22' /500 W EA. Leeal depression /' . 500 W EA. Local depression it' 1000 00 __ EA. Junetlon structure , 5000 00 FA. Outlet Structure, Ste 1506 , 15DD W __ EA. Outlet structure, Std 1507 . yW 00 FA. Cuard pasta . AO W L,F, Guard panel (wppol 25 W Tit L.F, 5awcut . 2 W EA. Headwall (IB• win9) . /W0.00 x30 L.F. Redwood header 1,75 S.F, Undsuping L Irr l9 anon 2,75 ___ Lf. Roll rurb lP.t.C.l 750 ENG IN EEA ING INSPECTION FEE ~p,~'y,~y~a SUB TOTPL ] •RE STORAii ON/OEL IYEAi IDN CASH Ygn CONTINGENCY COSTS 6 DFP05I7 (gEfuNDApIE) FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BONG (IW%) ]~ EIONUMENTAT ION SURETY (CASH) w~9 LpBOR AND MNTERI Pi DONO (50%) 3G• 9a •Pursuant to CItY pf RaMho Cucaaon9a Nun lcipal Code, Htle I, DNaptK 1.OA, adopting Stn &rnardliro County Code Titles, CnaDters 1.5, a case restoration/delineation Mposlt 3M11 W Moe prior to ISSUan<e of an Enylneerin9 Conitructlan PenAlt. Per ' RESOLUTION N0.-~E02-~20-02R = `~- ~'G • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCiI OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 64-18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has far its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on ' February 12, 1985, by Martin Jaska as developer, for the imorovement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south side of 7th Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and Subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 84-18; and WHEREAS, safd improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Rgreement. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E tT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Callforn ia, that said Improvement Agreement and said • Improvement Security be and the same are hereby aooroved and the Mayor is • hereby authorized to Sign said Improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1985. RYES: NOES: ABSENT: on D. i e s, Mayor ATTEST: every u e e , y er jaa • • 11V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 20, 1985 TD: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 6. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kroll, Engineer Technician ~g G~%~'NOM- `C ~`Y ~ ;; x. ~~ A r ~ I~ i9%% SUBJECT: Approval of Subordination Agreement submitted by William and Dana Barnes for their property located at 12715 Summit Avenue • The Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by William and Dona Barnes to guarantee the future construction of street improvements along the frontage of their property located at 12715 Summit Rvenue was approved by City Council on May 16, 1984. In order to secure financing, the lender requires that this Lien Agreement be subordinate to a Lien in favor of the lender. Mr. and Mrs. Barnes have submitted the attached Subordination Agreement far City Council approval. RECD!lENUATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving said Subordination Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. ko r1 u Attachments ~~ VNEN RECORDED PEASE SEND TD CITY CLE 4H LITV OF gayrun EaLAMUN GA P. 0. 30% 807 UB00.DINA 7ION AG0.E EMENT RANCHO CL'CAHONGA, CA 9177 NOTICE: THIS SU904 OS NATi ON AGREEM EVT 4ESOL iS IV YO'!R SE C'J47'Y INTEREST IN THE Pft 0PE4TY 9ECOM [HG SUBJECT i0 RNO LO4Eq Pq I9RiTY TMRV iNE LIEV OF SOME OTHE4 OR LATER SE[U4IiY INSTR VxE4T, 7HIS ADAEE°EVT, node this day of ,1995 by Mill i. an A and Opna C Barnes, owner of tn¢ and=fnaf te^ described and hereinafter ref =_rreA to as "Owner" anA the City Rancho Cvcarvnga hereinafter referred to ds "Gifu", owner and hplAer of the certain Real Prooerty and Lien Agree Tent hereinafter -- _-red to az "Lien Agreement". VITNESSETH THAT 'dH E4 ER$, The 9ea1 Prooerty Imvrovement Contract an7 Li¢n Agreement dated xay 17, 1984 covering: The Nest 1/2 pf Lot 2, Blocv "D•', according to the preliminary moo of Eti Wanda f,o lonv Lands, in the County of San 9ernardino, State pi Caaifvrn ta, as per plat rec oreA in 8pov 2 of raps, Page 24, recorAS of said County. E%CEPTi4G THEREFROM the Nest 20 feet. RL 50 E%LEPlNG THEREFAON the North 324 feet of the East 168 feet of said land; to secure the construction pf street ImprOV em¢nta whi<h wdz recorded way J1, 198a, Instrument Np. 84-127730 in the Official Records of said County; and NHERE AS, owner has e.ecut ed a deed of frost and note +n the sum 0I CVF. !!i: V0P9P SIiBi ?r!pL'SA.Vp Fi'r'E PpXCOED ML:FPS (i06. 509 ,: Ji dated ~n avor Of SCQ'.4E SAV: S'LS n.Yp :,]A.Y A56^]:.iTt:.Y erpindf C2r r of erre ,p as 'Len or oaya e n to ,n ter r.st an, upon the :erms• and cpndi :i ohs de sc rs bed mere ~, which deed of trust is m he recprtl<d con rdrrent`y herewith; tnd VHEAEAS, it is a condition pr~v=dent to moving said loan that said deed of [rust last above -pntipned sh ail uncondl[onally be and remain at all times a lien pr ch arge oven the land hereinbef or¢ described, or for ant superior to the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement; and VNE4E AS, lender is wi 111np [o mdve said loan or ovlded the deed of trust securing the sane is a Ii¢n pr charge upon the abov< described Prooerty prior to sup^-i or Lo the lien or charge of ih< Lien Agreement and provided that L1ty •111 sDeNfically anA unconditionally subs rdin ate the lien or charge of the Uen Agreement to the tlen or charge of She deed of trust in favor of Lender; dnd NNEREAS, it is the mutual bene`i[ of th¢ parties hereto that Lender modify said IOdp t0 Ow nor; and Lity 15 willing that the deed Of Cr1152 seCI1r16y the sdme Sndll CpnStltpt< d 1{¢n Or Cildrq¢ upon said 1d~~L which is unconditionally prior tp superior to Lhe 11pn or charge on the Lfen Rgr Bement. NON, iNEREFOR E, in consideration of the mutual b<n efits acc urine to the parties hereto antl other valvab le consider anon, the receipt and sufficiency of which cons ideraClpn iz hereby acvnowledged, and in orA er to induce Lender to moAffy the loan above referred to, It is hereby declared, understood anA agreed as follows: (l) That satA deed pi Crust secur inq satA note to fdV Or pf Lender dnA d9y reneNdls nr eaten510nS thereof, shall unconditionally be anA remain at all times a lien pr charge on the property therein • described prior and suoeri or to the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement. ~- (2) That Lender would not male its loan above d escrfpetl without this su bprdina!'pn ag r¢¢men t. (3) That this agreement shall be the wh ol¢ and pniv agreement with r¢g and to the v~bprdna:ign of th¢ Tien qr charge of the Lien A^y re¢ment tp the lien or charge of the deed of trust ~n favo^ of Lender above referred to and shalt sup^^seAe anA cancel, but only ini ofar as wou 7C affect tho prig^i!v be teefn tF,e lead pf trust and Lion Agreement snv prior dgrEem2nts a5 [a tUCh subgrd'n at bn including, but not limi!ed tp, tnoze provisions, if any, coot a+ned the !ien Agreement wh;ch provide for Che su~bgrdinaiion of th¢ lien qr charge thereof to another deed or d¢eds of trust or to another mortgage or mortgages. The City declares, agrees antl actnpwledges that: (a) He consents to and approves all prgvis+ons of the note antl deed of Lru st in favor of Lende^ above referred tp by that certain mpAivic anon ogre ement by and Cetween Owner and Lende^• aaeea (b) He intentionaity and unconditlon ally waives, relinquishes and subordinates the lien or charge ' of the Lien Agr e¢mCn[ 10 fdvpr of the 11¢n pr charge upon said land of the deed of trust in Povpr of Lender above ref errad to and antl erstands that in reliance upon, and in consideration of this waiver, relinquishment and subordination • specific loans and a^nn<es are being and will be made and as a Dart ar9 parcel the rent, tPeci He monetary and other o~'inations are being and wilt be entered into vnich vnuld not he male or en to^ed into but for saiA ^el lance upon this waiver, relinquishment and subq^dination; and (<) An endorsement has been placed upon [he Lien ggreement that said Lien Agreement hat by this lnstru ment been su bq Minuted to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to. NOTICE: THIS SUBORDIYA TION AGREE+IE NT LDRTA]NS A RRD YI SION VHT F,H AL LD'AS THE PEASOR OBL(GAiEO ON YOUR REAL PROPERTY SEC OAiTY TO OBTAIN A LOgN, A PORTION OF NN;^,4 MAY 9E E%PE NOEO FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN IMPROVENENi OF THE LA'10. .(wy~. nyy.~y, +~ - ~' 8.s ~ y ~ , _ j~L21Aa1 R. a11N RC1 -~- b IVi~A~N~ OA CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA _~ -_- ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED art FHB 0619NS r uunn o~ :., c.::e::u >d 3 ftESOLUT ION N0.-E92-2B-83R "`--~.- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM WILLIAM & DONA BARNES ANO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of curb, gutter, A.C. pavement, drive approach and street lights along at 12715 Summit was approved by City Council on May I6, 1984 and recorded in San Bernardino County on May 31, 1984, Instrument No. 84-127730; and WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing far the project, the lender requires that the above-mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordinate Agreement be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the . City Clerk attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of Fehru ary, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authelet, lty Clerk jaa ~' T • STAFF REPORT Vry GATE: February 20, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Eng inee SUBJECT: Release of Bonds ,~ Gv~^MO,y` 9 3 ~ si ~ '~ _~~ 1977 Tract 12184 - located South of Base line and East of Beryl DEVELOPER: Town & Country Development 133 N. Pixley Street Orange, CA 92668 Monument Bond (Cash Deposit) 52,800.00 n lJ All final monuments for Tract 12184 have been set and the developer has signed an "Assignment of Cash Deposit" to the Engineer, John G. Goetten. It is recommended that Council authorize the City Clerk to release the cash deposit in the amount of 52,800.00 to John f,. Goetten, Consulting Civil Engineers, Inc. 12919 Summit Avenue DEVELOPER: Richard T. and Carol French 12919 Summit Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91139 labor and Material Bond 54,250.00 Six months have passed since the reiease of the Faithful Performance Bond for the above referenced tract and no claims have been filed. It is recommended that Council authorize the release of the remaining 54,250.00 being held by Western Community Bank. ~J y5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT • u Y_ DATE; February 20, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Nubbs, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Authorization to Invite Bids for the Amethyst Avenue Sidewalk from Base Line Road to Monte Vista Street Improvement Pro,iect The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by Wilson-Bryant and Assptiates, Civil Engineers, reviewed by Staff and approved by the City Engineer. The project generally consists of the installation of missing sidewalk along the East side of Amethyst within the project limits. Also, some curb and gutter, cross-gutter, drive approach, match-up paving and underground electrical conduit for Future street lights. The Engineer's Estimate is E30,500.00. The above project has been previously approved for funding utilit;zing Pedestrian Sidewalk Grant (E20,000), gas tax and systems development funds. RECOIMENDATIOM: Staff recommends that the City Councit authorize the City Clerk to advertise "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Amethyst Avenue Sidewalk from Base Line to Monte Vista Street Improvement Project, approve the funding source, Pedestrian Sidewalk Grant and System Development funds, and approve the design, plans and specif icat ipns fpr the above project. Respectfuliy sub ~ ~ LBH: :hc ~~V CITY" OF RANCHO CtiCA.510NGA STAFF REPORT GATE: February 20, 1985 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Nubbs, City Engineer 8Y: Richard Cota, Rssistant Civil Engineer CMG N~~C 9 ~;- ~ ~;, _ ~ F Z t~'T SUBJECT: Award of Design Services for the Widening and Reconstruction of the West side of Turner Avenue (81ock Grant Project) to Norris-Repke, Inc. On dams ary 24, 1985 in response to requests for proposals, four engineering firms submitted proposals for Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) far the Widening and Reconstruction of the west side of Turner Avenue as welt as the full improvement of Main Street from Turner Avenue west for approximately 200 feet. Because this is a Block Grant Project, we have invited two certified, minority engineering consulting firms to submit proposals for said project. A listing of the proposals is as follows: ENGINEERING FIRMS PROPOSAL R. Boughman and Associates (MBE) E15,590,00 A. H. 8. Associates (MBE) 514,220.00 Linville Civil Engineers, Inc. S 8,816.00 Norris-Repke, Inc. E 8,100.00 RECOIMENDATION The firm of Norris-Repke, Inc. is recommended to be awarded the Enqineerinq Services Contract for the Widening and Reconstruction of the West side Turner Avenue from A. T. & S. F. Railroad North to Feron Bivd. for an amount not to exceed E8,100.00 plus 10% for contingencies. This amount is considered Dart of the Block Grant funding. Respectfully sub, fitted, LBd: :jaa Attachment !f 7 O U N 00 W O 6' ~ ~ 6 Z N 0 i Wes, cr 3 ~ W W W W w i Z 4 W W 6' F 0 ¢ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 z .~. e E .-i S N ^+ ~-~' w w a m U O ~ O o • O C O • O • N a w w J 2 ~ g o c o c o 0 0 0 o v c c O In e N n N a In E x 1n a n Y ti q w w ~- w w M L r o Y O N O n N fO E a Y .. w x m O c o ~ ~' O c o o o ° ~ + rn b e N 4A N a~ n l(` O C 2 w w w u w -- 0 0 O O O O • O O O N O Yl N t0 M e N w .r w w K u ' O ~+ • ~ E b G / .+ ~ m H 'i O •', U Q1 ~- M K w ~ 6 ~ w O O O [C O ~ !- O O O O O m .-. O O O 1 1(1 ti O O O Il] O 1• O O O N O O O E E o O O O O E E O a+ O In C q7 a a e O O O O a a O .-1 nn d' ^ a + ~ e e PF U N O Z ~ U M ~+ v q p H q qv 2 `•• M H q A-` C C vl O P G 9 C J G O C O Q ~ ~ O N V H G O V C U ~ C U C A i c L - L v a L o E N z a+ c H o v v O U a C N O O P _ Y U MN O L ~ a n G U G C F-' ad N ~O U V Y a+ pi O O U d O ~ ad N q q pL U •n r -~ L 6 a y 1L E ^ N {+ U L K U ~O a 6 •-1 ^ G N N q ~ U N ~ O P O G N N N W O' vi a ~ O ~ n W a 1! L 6 1O •~ n- W U L V O ry C O a piC W L A E C UV.1 N N d ~ C C • ~ U d U a J a O N d ~ W a ~ O EO K W ~ W L ^ L C .E V U f, ~ T a> a In v a c a a a a+ vl a . . T a N L a L i s L a L E C C C a G6 N•~ TN NO r0 C A La 01 001 O > r 6'O 6 G 6 Q p r a U •~ N L ••'• 01 L a O a N a L a 01 a L L N a N W V1 ~ WW dV1 dd 6•Y d W 1 WQ p 1 O y d0 W O V ~ m 2 •-1 N (~1 O N ~O 1~ W 01 ^y .-1 . 1 .1 P•1 )y~ ^y 1 U • RGREEMENT FOR CONSULTRNT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of _, 198_, between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and lorris-R epke, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". WI TNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City desires to prepare designs, construction plans, specifications and cost estimates for the Reconstruction and Improvement of Turner Avenue from Feron to the A.T.S.F. Railroad Crossing hereinafter referred to as "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has the necessary skills and qualifications and licences required by law to perform the services required under this • Agreement in connection with said Project; and WHEREAS, the City desires to retain the Consultant for services hereinafter described in connection with said Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of February, 1985, authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to enter Soto this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties that: 1. DEFINITIONS. As used in this Agreement, the following definitions shall be applic zble: a. Consultant. Consultant shall mean Norris-R epke, Inc. consul t'.ng Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors a California Corporation located at 17662 Irvine Blvd., Suite 7, Tustin, CA 92680. -1- ~~Y h. City. City shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a • Municipal Corporation, located at 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. c. City Council. City Council shall mean the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuczmonga. d. Services. Services shall mean the services to 6e performed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. e. Satisfactory. Satisfactory shail mean satisfactory to the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform for, and furnish to, the City the services described in Exhibit A, "Scope of Services" attached hereto. 3. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. The Consulant agrees that it shall del ingently and responsibly pursue the performance of the services required of • it b,y this Agreement and that said services shall be completed within 90 calendar days from the date of Notice to Proceed following the execution of this Agreement in accordance with the Project Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B, 1f a delay beyond the control of the Consultant is emountered, a time extension may be mutually agreed upon in writing by the City and the Consultant. The Consultant shall present documentation satisfactory to the City to substantiate any request for a time extension. 4. PAYMENT. Upon satisfactory completion of the services described in the "SCOPE OF SERVICES", (Exhibit R) the Consultant shall be compensated based _p_ • ,r^ • upon the actual time spent on the Project at the Consultant's standard hourly rates attached hereto as Exhibit C, plus outside services, but shall not exceed a total amount of w8,100.00, with option to engage construction survey for an additional 55,150.00 (survey price to be reconfirmed at the time of construction). In the event of authorization, in writing, 6y the City of changes from the work as indicated in Exhibit A or for other written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated herein, additional compensation shall 6e allowed far such extra work based upon the Consultant's standard hourly rates (See Exhibit C). The Consultant shall submit invoices which specify the area where work was completed and the associated time for completion to the City for • approval. The Consultant agrees to invoice the City for services rendered not more often than once a month. Work performed at the request of the City, outside the limit specified in this Agreement, is to be designated as "Extra Work" on monthly invoices. Work performed in connecticn with an authorized written change order will be so designated on said invoice. 5. CITY SUPPORT. The City shall provide the following items of support to the Consultant: a. Provide a staff engineer to work with the Consultant for the purpose of giving advice and to provide coordination within the scope of this Agreement. b. Make available and provide all existing data and information relevant to Lhe proposed Project. c. Provide all right-of-way negotiations. -3- 51 n u d. Provide environmental processing. e. Provide traffic index. f. Provide plans and specifications for 6idd ing. g. Prepare and mail final utility notice. 6. SUSPENSION, TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OE AGREEMENT. The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof, 6y serving upon the Consultant at least fifteen (15) days prior to written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days of service of said notice, the City shall pay to the Consultant all earned and unpaid fees and costs based upon the rates attached hereto as Exhibit C, plus outside services, but the sum so paid shall not exceed a dollar figure which bears the same proportionate relationship to • $8,100.00 as the quantity of work completed by the consultant hears to 100X of the work prescribed herein. If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the renalnder of this Agreement. 1. BREACH OF CONTRACT. [f the Consultant defaults in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of written notice of such default in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without • -4- J r! prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. nyluFRSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall became the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. 9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at ail times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's officers, employees or . agents, except as herein set forth. The Consultant shalt not at any time ar in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or ayents of the City. 10. LEGAL RESpoNSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way attest the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, its officers and employees shall not 6e liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 11. ASSIGNMENt. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any moneys due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. -5- ~3 12. INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain general liability and • workers compensation insurance coverage effective on the first day of work and in full force throughout the full term of this Agreement. The policy ar policies shall be underwritten by insurers admitted to operate in the State of California, on farms no less broad in the scope of coverage than standard forms. Entire limits of liability maintained must be certified but in no event sh ail limits be less than specified hereinbelow. Any aggregate limitation of liability shall be separate as to the risks arising out of the subject matter of this proposal. Coverage Minimum Limit Workers' Compensation & Employer's Liability E100,000.00 Comprehensive General Liability/Comprehensive E500,000.00 • Auto Liahility Combined single limit each occurance If requested, the Consultant agrees to deposit with the City, certificates of insurance to satisfy the City that insurance requirements of this Agreement have been complied with, and to keep such insurance fn effect and the certificates therefore on deDOSit with the City during the entire term of this Agreement. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto ar referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto and supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. -b- • 3' ~! • In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to 6e executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSULTANT on D. Mike s, Mayor Date: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk • APPROVED AS'TO FORM: _ j ,~ .. _, /~ ~~ By ~~ -',i _~ ~ ",'i_ 4 , City Attorn -~- NORRIS-REPKE, INC. Consulting Civil Engineers and L/and Surveyors ~ ~ BY: ,/! ,.~~1-;iii` ~I ~..f:~ I Date: ~. - % - i-' Date: ? ~ '^; ~~ CS' City of Rancho Cucamonga The following is an outline of our proposed scone of services. It is our intent that this outline provide enough detail so our approach is clearly defined. \ NRI 66-01 \ Sanuary 24, 1985 • EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES A. Orientation and Data Collection 1. Meet with City staff and hold "kickoff" meeting. Present a list of information needed. Discuss design criteria, requirements and procedures. Obtain needed direction from City staff. Discuss project schedule and make adjustments if necessary. This is a critical meeting and adequate preparation and time must be allocated. ?. Collect available inf. ormation pertaininy to the project including benchmark data, survey control data, right of way information, City Standard plans, existing street and storm drain plans and appropriate des i.gn criteria. 3. Perform comprehensive review of material obtained. This • review will determine the parameters of what additional information is required. All data collected will be reviewed and problems brought to the attention of City staff. e. Field Design Survey Perform the Follrn+i ng field survey: 1. Establish centerline control and stationing. 2. Establish vertical control from City benchmark. It is our understanding a benchmark is located at 8th Street and Turner Ave. 3. To nog ra phy within limits of ultimate right of way on Turner Avenue (100 Eeet) from A.T.S.F. Railroad to about 125 foot north of Feron Blvd., on Main Street (70 feet) and on the south side of Feron Blvd. for about 200 feet west of Turner Avenue. Also certain items located beyond the right of way will be located or noted if pertinent to the design (i.e. existing driveways, sidewalks, trees, etc.). • ~J~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ \ ;JRI 6G-O1 • January 24, 1985 4. Cross sections at SC feet intervals on Turner Avenue from the A.T.S.F. Railroad to 25th Street, on Main Street and on Feron 61vd. for about 7C0 feet west of Turner Ave. Cross sections will extend to 10 feet beyond ultimate right of way except at existing driveways where they will extend 25 feet beyond ultimate right of way. 5. A11 original survey data will be prepared in a legible organized manner and presented to the City in a presentable format. C. C.E.Q.A. Initial Study Parts I and II of the City's Initial Study Questionnaire would be completed and delivered to the City Eor processing. These would be completed after the field survey was completed and plotted and in conjunction with a field review so the of Eects of the project could be better determined. This proposal does not include attendance at Planning • Ccmmission or City Council mee ti ng_. D. Cons truc[ion Document Preparation This phase of the project includes the following services: 1. After plotting of the field survey perform an extensive field review to establish the limits of pavement removal and other pertinent design requirements. 2. Prepare a "title" or first sheet showing a L" = qp' scale final striping plan. Also included on this sheet would be: - Project title - Utility and drawing legends - Benchmark/Basis of Bearings - Construction quantities - Standard title/Signature blocks 3. Prepare Plan and profile sheets at a scale of 1" = 40' for Turner Avenue, Main St. and the south side of Feron Blvd. This proposal is based on designs and plans being prepared to conform with the design report prepared by the City and dated December, 1984. The plans would include the following items: - Topography within Ultimate Street right of way - Right of way limits - Tract and lot numbers with lot lines - Utility locations K~~7 ~. / ~ \ ~ ~-~ City of Ra rcho Cucamonga L~\ J\ NRI 66-01 January 24, 1985 • - Construction elements clearly defined - Profiles of existing and proposed top of curb or edge of pavement centerline 4. Prepare cross sections Eor design pur noses only showing existing conditions and proposed construction. 5. Prepare bid proposal and special provision section of project specifications usinq Green Do ok as Standard SpeciCica[ion. Project. information would also be placed on "boiler plate" provided by the City. 6. Prepare itemized construction quantities and cost estimate. E. Construction Document Processing 1. Upon completion of the preliminary plans, specifications and cost estimate, submit two (2) sets of each to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Eor review and comment. 2. Meet with City staff to discuss results of City staff • review. 3. Make agreed on revisions and corrections to the plans, specifications and cos[ estimate and re-submit as above. 4. Opon final completion, acceptance and approval of the plans, specifications and estimate by the City provide the City with the original plans, specifications and itemized cost estimate. F. Utility Coordination Contact utilities per list provided by the City and obtain utility location inEorma tion. 2. Plot utility location and information on the plans. 3. Prepare preliminary utility notices and send preliminary plans to utilities. 4. Monitor responses Erom utilities. 5. Review conflicts and recommend mitigating measures. Attend meetings regarding adjustments and relocations. Additional • designs required are not included in this proposal. 6. This proposal is based on the final utility notice being handled by the City. v G R \ City of Rancho Cucamonga • ~\ NRI 66-01 January 24, 1985 G. Legal Oescripti ons Prepare 1=gal descriptions and "plat mans" for corner c~~t-off and four foot strip right of way acquisition at the followrng three locations: - AP x209-085-18 Carmen/so Sanchez 8809 Turner, R.C. - AP y209 -085-10 George 5 Robert/JT M.inija rez 8848 Turner, R.C, - AP x209-085-16 Pete G. Etal s Ben Travaglia, 10091 tda in St. R.C. H. Files This proposal includes the preparation and maintenance of pzo ject files as listed in the request for proposals. It is our understanding that only the inf ormaLion generated by the consultant is to he included in these files and it is the City's responsibility to consolidate the City and consultant files at the completion of the project. • I. Construction Phase :4e propose to provide the following se rvicos during the construction phase of the project; L. Attend pry-construction meeting. 2, Clarify plans and answer questions regarding the designs and specifics t.i ons prepared. This dons not include redesign due to unforeseen conditions or field visits. 3. Provide construction survey if requested by the City. J. Project Meetings In addition to an initial "kickoff" meetiny and other meetings specifically stated in this proposal, it is our opinion that progress meetings should be held during the design process so that there may be frequent communication regarding the project. In this way City staff is kept informed on the project progress, Problem areas can be discussed and additional direction can be received by the consultant if needed. We therefore propose to request a progress meeting at appropriate times during the course of the design. We anticipate a maximum of two meetings will be required 1 y ~~~ Cit}' of Rancho Cucamonga r NRI 66-01 \ Canuary 24, 1985 Page 11 • FEE NORRIS-REPRE, INC. proposes tc provide the services as outlined in this prooosal for a not to exceed fee amount of 58100.0 0. The following presents an itemized estimate of the fee Eor the various areas of service. 1. Orientation and Research includ irg oreparation and maintenance of files 5 400.00 2. Field Design Survey 1800.00 3. C.E.Q.A. Initial Study inc Lading field review 400.00 4. Constcu coon Document Preoara tion - Construction Plans including Utility Coor- dination, cross-sections and design meetings 4000.00 - Specifications/Documents/EStima[e. 900.00 5. Legal Descriptions 400.00 • 6. Construction Phase 200.00 Total Fee 5 R100.00 As requested, the following fee is proposed £or providing the construction survey requirod to complete the improvements outlined in the City's project report. 1. Provide one set rough grade stakes at 50• inter- vals along right of way. Paint join lines 5 800.00 2. Provide one set "Blue Top" for subgrade and aggregate base on 50' intervals (one row each street) 900.00 3. verification of line and grade for subgrade, aggregate base, curb and gutter form and finished grade. (4 trips) (If requested). 1500.00 4. Provide stakes for RCP and catch basin 150.00 5. Provide one set curb and gutter stakes 1300.00 6. Reset centerline intersection monuments. 500.00 • All fees would be invoiced monthly based on actual time worked and the Hourly Rate Schedule included in the Appendix as Ex- hibit C. ~'~/ I~ iI City of Rancho Cucamonga \ ~ \ NRI 66-01 • \VI .7a nuary 24, 1985 Page 8 CITY RESPONS I~ILITIES This Proposal is based on the City assuming the :`ollowing respcnsibiliCics: 1. Make available and provide all existing data and information relevant to the proposed project. 2. Provide City Standard linen drawing sheets 3. Provide all right of way negotiations. 4. Provide environmental document processing. 5. Provide title reports. 6. Provide plans and specifications for bidding. • ~' xo ~~ 0 4 U 0 n F $ V ~ O ~ Z d w ~ O G •2 E U w W ~ a ww ° z ~~ o a E. a z ~ oa -~ F Z x m a F N r+ G / N ~ N O / E H U p O. .+ O Q .+ >. ^ O 'O / J 7 G F / 0 N iL f/I E N ., u ~ K m .. u u o G N ~ O ~i W p / b / 1! d T .ti N F O+ ti C N C C O C H ~ w u / m N / ~ U N v N N Q v ^ N ^ / 4 W L G ~0 CY N / O v .. a m H m ~ v w v ca rn H .ti M O N O W U W V .7 ~~ n u • ~~~I City of Rancho Cucamonga :SRI 66-01 • January 24, 1905 EXHIEIT C SCHEDULE OE STANDARD I!OURLY RATES Registered Engineer 5 17. 00 Licensed Land Surveyrr 53. 00 Designer/Supervisor 47. 00 Design Drafter 38. 00 Drafter 28. 00 Clerical 24. 00 Survey Crew (3-man) 128. 00 (2-man) 10""<. 00 (1-man) 72. 00 • The above Eees will be escalated 63 on each August 1, beginning August 1, 1985, for any work uncompleted et the time through no fault of Engineer. Outside agency Fees art not included in the above fees and will be billed at cost plus 10'#. FAOPOSac • CHRTIFZCaTZON OF NOH-DISCAIMINATIOA BT CONTRACTORS As suppliers of goods or services to the City of Rancho Cucaaonga, the fL^a listed below certifies that it does not discr iainate in its employment with regard to age/handicap, race, color, religion, sex or national origin, that it is in compliance With all federal, state and local directives and executive orders regarding non-discriaination in employment; and tF.at it agrees to deaonstra to positively and aggressively the principle of equal opportunity in employment. We agree spec L°icaily: i. To establish or observe employment policies which affirmatively promote opportunities for ainority persons at all job levels. 2. To communicate this policy to all persons concerned, including all company employees, outside recruiting services, especially those serving minority communities, and to the minority communities at large. ' 3• To take affirmative steps to hire minority employees within the firs. :.OP P,14-REPKE, IN.C. • TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING Presi.dec7t DATE ~-2¢-~; ,> Please include any additional inforaation available ..^egard ing equal opportunity employment programs now in effect within your firm. E-3 ~~ u STAFF REPORT ~~~~~~ ~~',,~ x ~~~ - ~ 19" I DRTE: 0c-05-BS • TO: Cxty Council FROM: Harry Ernvey, France Di recSC~r ~ SU6JECT: gddit Tonal gdprodrt at lon/E~.u id inv 8 Safety RECOMMENDgTION: T,. adorodriate an add it ir•nal sB5, 000 xn the build ir~o & Safety Deoartrner~t for the o~.irodses of meet xrm the additional work load demands created by the tremendous ~iosur ge xr~ b~.u ltl xr~q act ivity in the City. quo an add it xcral f5, 000 will be needed in the Maintenance arse oderat ion accoxmt far supdorc. Wlth increases lYi Peldted revBnU@5. ?yen aver` the venerOUS area :ct ions tnat were made at the ov9se*, of the Fiscal year, it is felt that enaidh add it .or,al hands will be available to warrar~*. the realest mace 6v the Euild xnb Gff icial. Jerry Grara, and ~or• Courc:l to Dive ravoradle o ~rsiderat ior~ to nxs rec~.iest. Girrer~t iv Plan Check Fees are anead :f the budget estimates ere c0%. whim dv Vear ena snCn~ltl dr'~. _~.~ce abo~.rt fS0, 000 to s~a,aas more than anticidated. qls• E~.ulainq Perrnit5 are rune xnq about lE% ahead of 6~adget ar•] snould droduce close to xf r,ot more than a f100. 000 over eiadget. These aodt :anal revernxes are clear :nd xcat iorv that a lot of worms a dc~: nd on, and that f: nanc:ai s~.rddort a necessary to ma: ntain the level of revernie that is being ^enerated. /~~ January 30, 1985 CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA MEMORANDUM T0: Harry Empey, Finance Director FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official ~/{ry~ SUBJECT: ALLOCATION OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS /T/0 _BUILDING AND SAFETY CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT During the first half of this fiscal year our inspection workload increased 48% and our plan check function processed twice the construction valuation processed during the same period last fiscal year, In order to cope with the burden pending recruitment of inspection and plan check personnel authorized in the budget, we were forced to rely heavily on contract services to meet commitments. (City Council was advised of our action ;n this regard several times) As a result, our contract services h a~ae exceeded our projection for the entire veer by aoproximateiy E50,000, to say nothing of the months remaining in this budget period, The purpose of this memo is to request that a supplementary allocation 6e processed through the City Council in order that we might continue to meet our responsibilities, and restore those funds bracketed for other contract services. The amount calculated to meet our needs until July is E85,000. (I reaiize that income dosn't necessarily dictate expenditures but our plan check income thus far has alreaAy exceeded expectations by some E62,000.) Your assistance in initiating a transfusion action will be sincerely appreciated, JG:11 ~0/ L CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 20, 1985 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Oeve lopment Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst ~~oaMp ~t ~i ~ h j ~ I''a - IIZ 19~` i SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF A PORTION OF THE 1985 MORTGAGE SUBS IOY BOND ALLOCATION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXC ED 6,000,000 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BACKGROUND: In August 1984 the City of Rancho Cucamonga applied to the State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee for E150,000,000 in Single Family Mortgage Subsidy Bonds. This request was made in anticip atinn of the City doing a 1985 Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. to date, a total of nine (9) developers have expressed interest in the City's 1985 Mortgage Bond Program. One of these developers, Lewis Homes of Southern California, is located in the Redevelopment Project Area and has also expressed an interest in participating in a Senate Bi It 99 Bond Issue as well. Because Lewis Homes is the only developer wanting to participate in an Agency Bond Program, there is not enough demand for the Agency to pursue it on an individual level. Stone and Youngberg, underwriter for the City 1985 Bond Program, has informed Agency Staff of a joint Housing Finance Agency that is being created for a 1985 Senate Bill Mortgage Bond Issue which Lewis Homes could participate in. In order for this to occur, the City would need to transfer a portion of the expected 1985 Bond allocation to the Agency. The amount of the transfer will be equal to the entitlement monies that Lewis Homes would have received in the City issue. Lewis Homes' supplemental monies will remain in the City issue, only the entitlement monies are requesting to be transferred. The other cities that would be participating in this joint issue are Covina, Calexico and Downey. Lewis Homes will pay all participation costs associated with each respective band issue. There would be no adverse impact upon the City's principal issue. ENDATION: Staff recommends that the City approve the transfer by ng the attached Resolution. Community Development Director JL:LD:ns !7 RESOLUTION NO.-A-2-20-03R " ~ ~ / • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, TRANSFERRING A PORTION OF THE ALLOCATION OF MORTGAGE SUBSIDY BONDS, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED E5,000,000, TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") has received an allocation from the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee; and WHEREAS, the City believes that the purposes of the City will be better served by having the Redevelopment Agency of the City carry out the issuance of a portion of the 1985 Mortgage Suhs idy Bond Allocation. NOW, THEREFORE, THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ODES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A portion of the City's 1985 allocation of Mortgage Subsidy Bonds from the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee is hereby assigned to the Conmlun ity Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Section 2. This transfer is for servicing Lewis Homes, a participating developer, in the 1985 Bond Program. The allocation transfer • will be equal to Lewis Homes' entitlement allocation as determined by the City. PRSSEO, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1985. AYES: * NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mike s, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City er GG ~9~ CITY HALL '333 VA LLEV 90 VLEVARO EL NONTE CAL FOP NIA 91'34 TELEPhONE r3!d~ 5%5-2:25 February 4, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Citv }tanager 9320 Sase Line, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Subject: Punitive Damages Dear Colleague: The frequency with which public employees, especially police personnel, are being sued for punitive damages has greatly accelerated in the last few years. This is no accident. Many plaintiffs' attorneys have come to :ecogn ize pwritive damage demands as a pnwerfal tool in their legal arsenal against public employees. The public entity is immune to the demand but the public emple7ee i5 left personally • exposed and vulnerable. The reason for the demand, even .i r.he:e no justification, is that they are a tremendous retaliatory tool to be raised against the employee who mast feu: their financial impact on his life as well as Their slat on his or her professional reputation. Furthermore, they can be used as a frightening tool in the negotiating process because the public entity may not wish to expose its employee to the rigor, of a lawsuit and his nr her professional reparation to the vagaries of a jury who may not be permitted ro be made aware of all of the evidence. The problem is that finding liability for, punitive damages seems to be easier than ever before even though it generally conceded that employees Today are mach better trained, much more aware of their responsibility to r.he public and mach better supervised. Juries today have lit rle difficulty in finding *he prerequisites for an award of punitive damages. Perhaps it is because the thieshhnld difference between an award for compensatory damages and pun hive damages Seems to blur. ~y Page 2 • At one time, punitive damages required a specific finding of real opnression, or real malice, or real fraud. Today malice may be implied and probably the same is true for oppression and fraud. Recently fhe courts have broadened the opportunities by holding " that gross negligence" or "bad faith" can also be justiEicat ion for an award of punitive damages. In anv event, the public employee has been made the butt of almost every conceivable lawsuit with total exposure for punitive damages. Police personnel in particular are beginning to feel the ravages of this exposure and no one can blame them for their sensitivity to this issue. By virtue of their duties, police personnel are frequently brought into positions of confrontation with some of the mare violent members of society. It has now become routine that in practically the majority of instances for each arrest the disgruntled arrestee on the advice of an attorney retaliates by a lawsuit and a demand for punitive damages. The attorneys that promulgated these suits have little concern for the ramifications of their demand other than it may garner a substantial settlement for their client. However, the real danger is riot that the public citizen must ultimately pay for this settlement from his hard earned wages but that there is bound to be a lack of enthusiasm by the average public employee to do what is necessary • to perform his job in a competent manner. One of the greatest judges that this land has ever known described it as the danger that public employees will perform their duties with a "lack of ardor". That judge was John Learned Hand and he understood that the greatest danger that, the nation faces is the danger of rendering police personnel impotent. He understood that if we removed all police perso oriel from the streets tomorrow the country could probably not survive the chaos that would follow. The same thing can be accomplished by immobilizing the police through fear of personal liability and accusations of professional incompetence. It is for this reason that it i3 essential that the public entity thak employs the police take steps to protect the public safety and welfare of the community even though they may be criticized for their support. Sometimes a special courage is uecessary to do that which must be done even though there may be those who will find it politically expedient to be critical. • /J Page 3 Nevertheless, it is the public entities that know that recruitment for police has been drying up. It is no longer a profession that has the image or the allure that it once had. It is the public entities that know that in order to continue to attract competent personnel that salaries have climbed dramatically, a fact which the taxpayer knows only indirectly. It is the public entity that knows even that with all the fringe benefits and all the high salaries that they are nvt holding on to their existing personnel. Also, it is the public entity that knows that the fear of punitive damages is having an affect on the performance of their employees. for the above reasons we are asking each City to adopt a resolution identical or similar to the ones already adopted by the Cities of El Monte, Norwalk and San Bruno which will be used to end this perverse activity directed against public employees by permitting employees to be covered by insurance against punitive damages (other states already permit this) or by clarifying the law and permitting a City Council to authorize payment where it is justified and they make certain findings. • ~ Your help is sorely needed. Please asaist us by adopting a resolution identical or similar to the ooe adapted by ES Monte `~~ and sendiny it to the following address: Mr. Sidney Maleck City Attorney City of E1 Monte 11333 Valley Boulevard E1 Monte, California 91731 Respectfully yours, Gregory D.;KOrduner Administr a'F ive Officer GDK:SM:ah ~(~ This matter has become so critical that even the State 9az is beginninq ` to ta:ce notice. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA :r::Ew :.~ ,.,.LL ~JI\0 ~ E . .'~, 1~ I 0 ,. r^L.ra u,. n. JLE' f.. f...: is .. L..:.n..r .. .~.~ .ttS:i[[a. [w ...'L J. • ~,..~; Sr 'k UF:.1 `. .: Yttf eaA FR ncCUw, i a .;, d. ~~.. Vli 'nl Y. Sanuary 1985 Dear Colleague: ... I 4 E ` F ~ 1 P P = ~,F Fa v .4E ..lP \ L :C[ ~ ~ LE .\ " i \E \~E u, •JP'~n •1L] L JISOa l\' NLC PXO . ' ~ ll::C `~I SiIi. FEP v :n ' f... S al[G.L •Il .: 5 I ¢~ ' :oen I want to call your attention [o an especially timely and valuable CEB program. For plaintiffs' lawyers these days, an almost routine question to ask is, "Does this case involve a bad faith claim?" The possibility of reaping punitive damages is a strong incentive for an affirmz_ive answer, a~~.d a wave of new case law seems to be encouraging [his [rand--especially if there is an insurance company's deep pock=: to look to. For lawyers who represent insurers, the specter of punitive damages looms larger and .anger. What preventive measures can reduce this risk? CEB's March/April program offers you a unique opportunity to learn how to apply this evolving body of law. It will give you a chance to hear how the state's most knowledgeable practitioners are handling bad faith cases. It will deliver wt itten materials that will assist you in pursuing or defending a claim effectively to settlement or trial. I encourage you to enroll now for CEB's Bad Faith Insurance Liter program. If you have to make a c o>,ce etween two o errngs on this subject, I urge you to choose the one being provided by the State Bar's continuing education provider, CEB. Sincerely, ~~~ Burke M. Critchfie ld • President 7a ' RESOLUTION N0. - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING AND RECOMMENDING THE AMENDMENT OF INSURANCE CODE SECTION 533, EVIDENCE CODE SECTION 352 AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 825 AND 490 AS THEY CONCERN PUNITIVE DAMAGES WHEREAS, pleiatif fs in lawsuits instituted again at pvb lic officials and amp loyeea are increasingly seeking punitive damages knowing [hat because such officers and employees are personally liable, [here is greater pre sears towards settlement of the li[iga [ion even where such claims are not yell founded; and WHEREAS, [here are instances where punitive damages have been awarded 6y jar iee against public off icicle and amp loyeea principally 6e cause such per sops are perceived to be unpopular def andante; and WHEREAS, juries have awarded punitive damages against public off icere because relevant but prejudicial evidence vas sac laded at tr iel and the juriee were no[ appr iced of all the facto and it is believed that [he admission of ali relevant evidence et a trial wherein punitive damages ate eou8hc would help • prevent any unjust award of punitive damages against public employees; end WHEREAS, it is believed chat municipalities ehou td have the authority to either pay for or insute Chair employees against punitive damages; and WHEREAS, awards of punitive damages do constitute disincentives to qualified persona to enter or remain in the public service and ie therefore contrary co the interests of all citi zena of [his State. NOW, TFIEREFORE, the Ci [y Council of Che City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby £ind, de [ermine, and recto lve act foll ovs: SECTION 1: That it does support and recommend chat Insurance Code Se ct iun 533, Evidence Code Section 352 and Government Code Sections 825 and 990 act [hey concern punicive damages be amended to read as £o hove: 2naaranee Cod< Section 577. Wilful act of incur ed; negligence An insurer ie not liable for a lose caused by the wil Eul act of the insured; but he is not exonerated by the negligence of the insured, or of the inaured's agents ar others. Nothin¢ contained herein is intended to 8~idmee Code Section 352. Discretion aE court to exclude evidence. `i3 Covermen[ Cade Section 825. Reque s[ for defense or defense by public anti [y; payment of judgement, compromise or ee [Clement; agreement with employee; rase rvetion of rights; memorandum of ands rstandi¢g. If an employee or former employee of a public entity request the public entity to defend him against any claim or action against him for an injury arising out of an act or omission occurring within the scope of his employment ae an employee of the public entity end such request is made iv writing not lees than 10 days before the day of trial, and the employee or former employee reasonably coopers tee in good faith in the defense of the claim or action, [he public entity shall pay any judgement based thereon or any comprom ice or settlement of the claim or action [o which the public entity has agreed. If the public entity conducts the defense of an employee or Former • employee age inet any claim oz action rith his reasonable good faith cooperation, the public entity shall pay any judgement be eed [hereon or any compromise or aetclement of the claim or action to which [he public enci ty has agreed; but, where [he pubiic entity conducted such defe¢ee pursuant to an agreement with the employee or former employee reserving the rights of Che public entity not [o pay [he judgement, compromise or settlement until it is eacabliahed chat the injury arose out of an act or omission occurring within the scope of his employment ae en employee of the public entity, the public ant icy is required to pay the judgement, compromise or settlement only if it ie eat ebiiehed chat the injury arose out of en ac[ or omission occurring in the scope of his employment ae an employee of the public entity. Nothing in this section *** sha 11 obli¢ate a public entity [o pay such part of a claim or judgement as is for punitive or exemplary damsges. • / I The court in its discretion may exclude evidence of ics probative value ie substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will (a) necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury. • If the provisions of this section are in conflict with [he provisions of a memorandum of uaderacanding reached pursuant to Chapter 12 (con®encing with Section 3560) of Division 4 of Title 1, the memorandum of unde rereading shall be controlling without further legislative action, eacep[ that if auch provisions of a memorandum of understanding require [he expenditure of funds, the provisions shall not become effective ua le es approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. Gove:n~e¢t Code Section 990. Authority [o insure generally. Except for a liability which may be insured against pursuant to Division 4 (co®encing with Section 3200) of the Labor Code, a local public entity may: (a) Insure icse lE against all or any part of any tor[ or inverse oondemnation liabi,l i[y. (b) Insure any employee of the local public entity against all or any par[ of hie liability for injury resulting from as act or omission in [he scope of his amp loymen[. (c) Insure, coo tract oz provide against a claim or the expense of defending a claim aga inet [he local public entity or its employee, whe [bar or no[ liability exists on such claim, including a claim for damages wader • Section 3294 of the Civil Code or otherw iee for the sake of example or by way of punishment, where auch liability arose from an act or omission in the scope of hie employment, and an insurance contract for auch purpose ie valid and binding notwithstanding Section 1668 of [he Civ tl Code, Section 533 of the Ineara¢ce Cade, of any other prov ieion of law. (d) A hoepi tal district may participate in a reciprocal or interiaeurance exchange with [he mamba ra of its medical staff ae provided i^ Section 1284 ¢E the Insurance Code. Onderliaing ( ) indicated additions by snendnent. Asterisks (*s*) indicate deletions by amendment. SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall certify to [he adoption of this Re so lotion. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOYTBD this 20th day of February, 1985. / L. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATc: 0e-14-BS TC: City Cr,,,incu • FROM: Harry 6mdey, Finance Direct raJ~ ~~+°/ SU6SEC?: Procedure for receiv:nq and tlistribut iYig apm:nist rat ive and c~mdl fiance fees for or hate aCt lVity 6pntls. "~~°'~ Z - ~3~~+G4. `z 19" I ?he attached r@sol ut icm is a Cor,t:n~~?-:rri of the ordcetlure the RJR 6oare initiated earlier wh ic- ~.n~.~st be concluded by Counoil atloot inq a sinn:ar reso L.ro .on. The activities of bonds and ccrtnPl canoe fees is ore of cooperative effort between the City ,i Rancho G.wam~~nga antl the Rar,chr_~ CucamGnq Retleve:oornerw Pgencv as these monies c~.rt accro55 both ggenc ies. u q nE50~_L~T ION OF THE CS T'Y Gr aq,uCNG CUCGkC~YGF ES"~HEL1SnI~VG yP~RGCEDUR't5 FCR RECEIV iNG rND -RLINS~ERRTNG COND iSS'Jc gDMiN iSTRgCi'JE gtiD Cu^1~~;L1NCE r•EES RESWEcW ~UrvDS wNE R5:;5, trre Cttv of ,Ranch.=~ C~.icanr~~nca may receive admtrus- tra~.ive fees from var tr, ~.rs tr~.rstees reoard:rm Ctty x~nc 155U25: aY~tl. ~HC'~E q~, e;~e C:tv of aancn~~ Gacann~nba will frcan time to tlrne receive a soectf tc oercer,taae to comae ranee fees for . tnr :.SSV dnCP_ Gf rOCr`t Oape revere~.ie brnic!~. ':GW, TrcaE=unc`, Ec :' RESOw ED, that gserve qtr tra5t arcaunrs are nerebv est ab l;.sned tv r•e :o:ve trUStee aonu rnstrat :.ve fees, como::ar~ce feet. antl ocher pert tr;ent mnr;tes, T;~te reserve is tc. matnta ui ;~ mtru nn.:m balance _` ?80.000, Lifter a bertotl ~:~f or~a (U vear the Ctty w,anarer rnav direct these F~,inGS to excess of the #50,000 r,n-, ur.!~n+ +~eo~.i lr^ement to be trar~sf erretl to the Cab ttal Reserve =~.mc of Sne Ctty of Rar~cno C+s amor~oa. ~ ,i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM • Date: February 13, 1985 To: Ci ty,~/,oy/\nlc~i~/ll and City Manager From: Dick Wdy ~r;?ark Project Cootdi nator w0 ~t:'GMO'lh+ ~ ~'. Y ~r~ ~4Y~ Z In-? ~ Subject: Acceptance of Offer £rom Alta Loma School District to Sell 2.3 acres Adjacent to Hermosa Park (Consent Calendar) BACKGROUND: The attached letter from the Alta Loma school District offers approximately 2.3 acres of Land, immediately adjacent to the Hermosa Park property for sale at the price of 5105,000 (approximately 545,652/acre). The property has been declared as surplus to the District and they have agreed to sell it to the City £or the price they origi pally paid fot the land. The City's purchase of this property will culminate a logical and incremental acquisiticn pr ogram for the Hermosa Park site. This acquisition w111 augment two previous purchases of 5 acres and 3.25 acres, "square off" the park boundaries and complete the park size at 10.5+ acres. With authorization from the City Council, the Commun ity Services Department wi ll work with the School • District and open escrow to purchase the property. A ECCIMMENDATZON: That the City Council: Accept the offer of sale from Alta Loma School District of 2.3 acres of surplus school property immediately adjacent to the Hermosa Park site, in the amount of 5105,000; and Authorize the 5105,000, plus any necessary and incidential acquisition costs to be disbursed from the Park Deve LOpment Fund for ;his purchase; and Authorize the Community Servi cea Department to work with the Alta Loma school District to open escrow pzoceedi nqa for the purchase of the site. DM/js Attach: District Letter Map of Purchase r`1 `J ~~ Alta Loma School District ssso-F Baseline Road . post ofRce Eox 370 Alta Lomy Calitomia 91781 7u/9R7.p7~ JOHN E. McMURTi~ Supenntendenr DEAN R. ENFlELD oEeernn loo PrrsvnneG'Popil PersonnH e w,n of eeuoune rnua.,o lees ~ uses MILLY STRAW Cum<v/umi5peoo! Rn/trfs STAGY 9ELSON Business Servtrrs February 7, 99H5 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Cucamonga, California Attn: Lauren Wasserman City Manager Gentlemen: Pursuant to provisions of Education Code section 39030, the Alta Loma School Dis[ria offers for sale to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that land designated as Lots 3 through 9 inclusive of that tract recorded as Trey[ 9387 Q.3 acres M/L) for the price of one Hundred five thousand dollars ($'105,0001. Time and details of sale to be agreed upon later by the City and School District. JEM:nd incerely, /' ~/o~~.:.h ~/ John E. McMurtry ' ' Superintendent • • JOHN C. BOOK ROBERY S. FROST kl BOARD OF TRUSTEES MRS. LIZ CALLARINI MRS. SANDRA A. OERLY ROBERT W, TANGEMAN ~ [ainw i' ~ DIAGRAM OF BUILDING AREAS ®IAiIC f~ANi I~~4 ~1'/ -tD~O~LsR CANYON iCNDD1. A~'TA~ CNOOL Du 7NICT efINAL fUNi r ',{t'' Aooaui N o• n' or' a ~ses.o6' _ ~ r- _- e~ RiNO¢R6AFTCN MIMMY ~. -- yARO ~~ Rine,-.I A z I~ ~~~ 0 "ICI v 3~0'. ~'~ o~~ "~u`1\ oV' 2., i-swlo 1~ ~ I--- I'~ n ~i _ ~ - *'- J VRIMf31~'~ G RApe2 IL~ I~~ h ~II PLOY GI20UND ~I SIB ~ \ OI A'G. I '~ NALNTNm II _ SroR~ I~ I D~H~ r ARNN I ~ ' ~K inn .~1 ~"fl~ ~ ~' it ~, Z~ ~i ~--- - a t 1 ?I ~~LC/CL I JPPL'R L~.~ C.p UI P. ~~.4DGS ;I ~~' PLI.Y ~iROUµC ~i 1 ,~ ~_ ~~._..--_ N o• ~i 4~ W G~0~9 • ~~,~ ~ i n C ir:~-' KP~'~ O F L h w LoT 9 /'~ ~o~ a ~ NE~~VM~i0-~5-I'A~i / LQT 7 u ~Y,1 ~I~ / I 1 V n % LoT 4 N I\/` PLOT PLAN ~ L.nT s Z - P __. hfp1~4MATE ~ ,~ ~~ LQT 4 ~ U~ ~ ®~ LoT ~ _ .. I or 21 iNu I ~~ ~...~~ AlOVi Ii NIAiVN[D IN AC CONDANGt NITN ANT. tOt to OIIICI 0/ iCM00l fIAN MINI aVtCrl-TU ie TITI~ l.6LLIf. ADYINI ~/ NAT COOL. // A CAA!.tLiL~F.L ••:'F.~!7, ~RCNITECT4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM ~~- x < ~ '~ 19" DATc: 0~-:4-BS TQ: C1LV Cq,"I Y:C1. FROM: Harry Enmev. Fnr,ar,ce Gnrect:~~- City Investment Poincv 7 At tacnee for City Cu,"~r,c:l's c_msidera st atemer,t with reoards to nnvestmer,t PolncV Statement has been ^regaretl v Gnverr,mer,t ;;ode that d>_rects each act adgress'S tnose areas that have been of the recent events to gefa:l the Ci +lont ebel io. c ion is a goincv ~' C1tV fuY,tl S. T~~15 accordance witn the . ant nes and ^asncaiiv ~eemetl weakest nr~ light :es ..f San lose and q6 1073 a:"it pored by G~rtese secs into root ion the re^ui remer,ts f-n` ag0gt lY~p C14Y lYNest mBY,t OOI1Cy anC as r`es,A it the recomrnengat nor, 15 LO hdve C.: LIY,Cll ddggt the att dCneO Pc,11Cy and to dq so annually as chances nn the law require, also nave the City "i reas:.rrer sn nn the attac~ed aol ncv tneredv mawir•q nt the off is tai City :nvestrnent Poi>.cv. ~3 CITY OF RlNCNO CUCRMONGR STRTEMENT CF INVESTMENT POLiCv • PURPOSE -nisk st at er0ent 15 lnt er~pep tU pPnV lpe pl.lltleilr:es fpr• the UrLldeYlt 1"V OSt "9eY:t !lf t^le l.1t V+5 ternom•arv 1u ie CaSn. aYltl ~41t i1nP_ tn? U!111C 1eS `er n:aurrnlo:r~e the eff.clencv of ine Cay's cash ma r.a Dement syst ern. -~.e L,. ;:-vale coa. a :_~ enhance the ecorlcmllc st atl,ls c° the Cay w•n.e or•otert. nc Its ot....e. casn. ~EJEC:?~c -he Clcvrs cash rnanaeernent svst er.: a .?s: ar•e^ t_~ acc~.lrate:v rnnaor ar:C f~R'e Cas` eN Ue Y~C aUr•es dYltl reVen!IeS. th!IS er,adl SYl^ the City i,.. YIV?SC ^.IYICS _ cue TUli25t eaten. U0552 p.e. Tne Clty at LBm UtS t J]Lalr: Ll°- ny~lest 'J1?i^ p. X551 U_e as Ion? a5 lr:vest merits meet tti? crlter•1d eSt a`u: isneC TGr• safety aria .:al.ntl ay. POLiCV -he Clty :rt Rar:chc~ Cl.lcamor:pa ooer•aces as ternpe r~.~ry pC:r:l ep :pie cash .r'~e5trneYrCS JrCer the @`:.Itlent rnaYl r`Llle (C:Vli '~ ~_e Serf lnYl Ec6.. • _: __p. )*. Tn is of Yvr`US the C:tv a broac spec*. r:.rn of Invest meat c ~rt!~•,ct les as .Drip as Lhe :nvestrnent is ceerm~c ^r utlent and a o d a:.owan ie '.I ricer c~.l r+^erlc lec lsl at:nn of the Stat a~ of Cai:forrlla :.3c ~. e^•nmert J;de Secc :. : 53600 er, sea.! . west ^•e~`s rnav pe made lr: the _. ,owlr,c raec ~.a: - '.oec~.lr:c:es of '.ne U. S. Governmer:t. !r its apencles - fraa ~.i EI_IS:ness Pcmin: str•a*.1~_n _l~ans - -._ „~flr_s c?s „f Deposit for a:re Depos:LS! piacetl with commerr. a. _an~s and/or say ;rms antl ioan corncanles - we:~~':ab.e Cert: flr_a*. es of Debosa - EanMers Pccept ances - Cr~mrrerc:a; Paper - ._oca. Aper:cy Srrvest merit ~ urlp (State ~ooil Demand Depus Its - 'e~~vchase Rp reernerl*.s tRedos! - Qass n~:pow Sav lrlps rcoour:t Demar:as De]~ns Its - Reverse ~eol!.cn ase Ro ree+~+erlts Crrterla fnr sei ect lr^P lnvestrner:ts ar:d Lne oreer of pr: or lty are: i. Safet v. ine safety and r•lsn associated wlt7 an lr:vest ment refers to the potent lai ioss r_:f or:rlcl ca i, Inter^ess era comb:rlat torl of these amoclrlt s. The City only operates vn those Invest merits that ar•e corlsvdered ver^v safe. • 2. ~_ltll_ud av. Th is refers to the abli ltv to "cash in" at any moment lrl time with a rnl rllmal cnance of i.osi rm some port lr, r. of or^irlc: pal c:r interest. t_ldu:d:ty a arl :nrn~:rt arlt Invest meat c..la i:tv especially when the need frr Lmexpectetl fl,lntls occurs occas: onal lv. LiJ 3. Vield. Vield is the potential tlollar earnings arr investrnerit can provide. Sometimes described as raie of return. Safeveec-rip. Securities purchased from brokers/dealers snail be held in third party safek.eegi r~^ py the trust decartment pf the local agency's banx r,r otner tlesigr~at ed third party trust, the Cityrs name and central. whenever possible. irr+estrnerit nbrect eve. The cash manap ernent system of the City r!f Rarshr! Gxcamchea is designed to accurately reanitor and forecast ex- penditures and revenues, taus ins urin^ the investment of monies to the fullest extent possible. gttem pts to obtain highest interest yields pvssi pie as long as investments meet the criteria required fqr safety acid iipludity. City Constraints. 7ne City of Rancho Cucamonga operates its pooled cash irrvest menu anger the Prudent Man Rule. This affords a 6roatl spectrgm Hof investment opportunities so long as the investment is deemec oral ent and is perrnissable antler currently effective iegislat icn of the State of California arrp otner ungr_~sed legal restrictions the City rnav Rrom time to tune peern to qe reasnndble and prudent. • 'rho City strives to maintain the level of roves: ~nent of all fuanps as near :00 Y• as posssple, through daily and pro rec~~d cash flow de- termir~aticros. Idle casn management and investment transactions are the reSpGYi53h111Ly Of the City Treasurer and i~r n15/her appC,l ntetl c es i p rise. -ne pasic premise underlying the Cityrs investment philoscrohy is, and will c,r•~.:nue to pe, to insure that money is always safe and available Where needeC. * '~ne prudent Man Ruie states, in essence, that "investing... prgperty fr_,r the penefit pf another, a trustee shall exercise the Judgement app care. upper the circumst ance5 then prevailing, whim men of prudence, ^iscretion and intelligence exercise ir, the management of their qwr, affairs. . City Treasurer City of Rancho Cucamonga • gttacnrnent: prudent Man Rule y ^. c J J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE; February 20, 1985 T0: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: UNDERWRITER'S AGREEMENT FOR DAY CREEK COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT - MELLO RODS ACT Attached please find an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Stone and Youngberg to act as underwriters for the Day Creek Community facilities District pursuant to the Melto-Roos Act. • RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve and authorize this agreement for signature. submitted, Development Director JL:jk Attach. ~~ ~~~~ ST()\E 8: YOL~\Gf3ERG • vEV3Eii >iC~ C>'CCi E[CM<M1,E UNDERWRITING AGREEMENT January 24, 1985 City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Jack lam, Community Development Director Re: Underwriter's Agreement for Day Creek Community Facilities District Melio-Roos 84-1 Honorable City Council Members: This letter will serve as an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Stone b Youngberg ("the Underwriters") to serve as Underwriters to the City until the parties enter into an actual Purchase Contract regarding the negotiated sale of bonds for the above-named project to be issued Dy the City pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 as amended. You have informed us that the City intends to issue the Bonds to provide • funds for financing various public improvements and far this purpose requires the services of the Underwriters to assist in the structuring of the financing and to enter into a Purchase Contract that is agreeable to the City and its financial advisor. As Underwriters we will use our best efforts to bring the Bonds to market at reasonable rates under then existing conditions. The Underwriters agree to undertake the below listed services and functions. A, Structuring and Financing The Underwriters will work with the City to create the mast feasible and efficient structure for the marketing ci' the ponds. 2. The Underwriters will work with the City's bond counsel in recommending specific terms and conditions affecting the Bonds. The Underwriters will prepare an Official Statement on behalf of the City (preliminary and final versions, respectively) far sale of the Bonds. Although it will 6e the responsibility of the Underwriters to prepare the Official Statement, the City agrees to participate in its preparation by providing pertinent information to 6e included Lheretn and agrees to review the Official Statement for accuracy as it relates to matters concerning the Bonds, the Improvement project, and the City. The Official Statement will include a description of the • Bonds and their security and pertinent financial and economic data. The execution and delivery of the Official Statement will be duly authorized by the City far use fn marketing the Bonds. I~ ONE CALIFORNIA aTREET ~ SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 9Utl ~ (AIS) Ymd7u • City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga January 24, 1985 Page - 2 - 4. If the City so requests, we will assist in arranging the selection of a paying agent. 8. Marketing the Bonds: At the designated time for the sale of the Bands, the Underwriters will submit an offer to the City to purchase the Bonds, subject to pertinent resolutions, the Official Statement, and all other necessary documents, approvals, and proceedings governing such Bands having been determined by bond counsel, the City, and the Underwriters to be satisfactory in all respects for financing purposes. It is intended that, once purchased, the Bonds will be re-offered to the public on the basis of an immediate "bona fide public offering". The Underwriters may forma group of investment banking firms for the purpose of underwri Ling and selling the Bonds. 2. At least one day prior to the submission of any such format offer to the City for the purchase of the Bonds, the Underwriters will indicate to the City the interest rate or rates, the purchase price • from the City, and public offering price of the Bonds which we then estimate will be fncluded in such offer. If, after negotiations in good faith, the City and the Underwriters fail to agree on the terms of sale of the Bonds, and upon written notice to the Underwriters the City may then offer the Bonds for sale to others. C. General Provisions Relating to the City and the Underwriters: 1. The City agrees to make available to the Underwriters without cost, sufficient copies of any applicable reports, agreements, contracts, resolutions, and other relevant documents pertaining to the improvement prajett, the City ar the Bonds as reasonably may be required from time to time for the prompt and efficient performance by the Underwriters of their obligations hereunder. 2. The Underwriters shall pay their own out-of-pocket and other expenses, including the cost of Underwriter's Counsel (if applicable), Blue Sky and Investment Memorandum, printing of the Offical Statement, and any advertising expenses in connection with the public offering of the Bonds. 3. The City shall pay from the proceeds of the Bonds all costs and expenses customarily paid therefrom including the cost of printing the Uonds and the Official Statement, and any other documents, the fees and expenses of its legal counsel, bond counsel, accountants, architects, engineers, and of any other experts or consultants retained 6y the City in connection with the financing. City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga January 24, 1985 Page-3- 4. It is expressly understood and agreed and the City hereby recognizes that in performing its activities the Underwriters are acting solely on their own behalf and plan to submit to the City a proposal to purchase the Bonds for resale. Nothing herein shall be construed to make the Underwriters an employee or financial, fiscal or other advisor of the City, or to establish any fiduciary relationship between the City and the Underwriters. It is understood and agreed that the City shall not be required to compensate Underwriters for services provided to the City under this agreement if the bonds are not sot d. If the Bonds qualify for bond insurance, and the City elects to issue the Bonds with such insurance, the City shall include the insurance premium as an incidental expense of the assessment district. 5. This agreement shall extend to the date of sale of the Bonds as contemplated herein, when the formal bond Purchase Contract is entered into by the parties. • 6, Nothing herein shall prohibit Stone b Youngberg from acting as Underwriter or financial advisor to the City or its Redevelopment • Agency on other financings. 7, Upon termination of this agreement, the City shall be under no further obligation to the Underwriters hereunder. Upon your acceptance set forth below, this letter wilt constitute an agreement between the City and the undersigned. Very truly yours, STONE /d YAUNGB,E;ZG//~ Scott C, Sollers Partner Accepted this _ day of 1985 By: SCS:crq (O165s) • J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: T0: FROM: SUBJECT: February 20, 1985 .~ GvCAMO~G' ~~ ~. x- , ~~ lll~z - > 19F 1 Members of the City Council and City Manager Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development Af,REEMENT FOR FINANCIAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR D Y CREEK COMMUNITY FACILITIES OI STRICT - MELLO 8005 Attached please find an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates to provide financial consultant services for the Day Creek Conenunity Facilities District pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act. RECOMMENDATION: That Cou ncile approve and authorize this agreement for signature. Resoectfu j,l ~' submitted, JACK LAM, AICP -- Community Development Director J L:jk Attach. 7U Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates • MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS .,T`.~f~F~R~!~C.'0 CUCAP,iGPJG1 ~.1"UilITY [EVE' OPYtFNT CEFT, January 23, 1985 yaw ~ - i~e~ AM PM Honorable Mayor and City Council 7~8~9il0illiLi1i2~3i4i$~g City of Rancho Cucamonga • 9320 C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Financial Consultant Services Day Creek Community facilities District Gentlemen: This letter proposal is submitted in accordance with a request from Jack Lam, Director of Community Development. The proposal is concerned with furnishing financial consultant services to be performed In conjunction with the Day Creek • Community Facilities District ("Project"j. Tne services which we will provide are as follows: A. General Assist In providing financial consultant services in connection with any and all financing requirements as they pertain to the proposed Project. In this connection, we will make available to you the research, statistical and consultant eta £1's of the Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates organization to such extent as they may be necessary and helpful. B. Spec Sflc Services 1) Review of Documents. Review oi' the financial aspects of all documents pertaining to the Project. 2) Municipal Bond Market. Furnish the City with information concerning the then current municipal bond market conditions and make recommenda d ons as to the technical details of the financing, including maturity u t~ 8081 Bueineee Ceutsr Drive. Suite 803 Irvine, California 88716 (714) 768.8781 n ~~ schedules, funds, covenants, prior redemption schedules, and other details which will, in our opinion, make the proposed financing most acceptable to the designated underwriter; and, therefore, mar ke table at the lowest possible interest rate. 3) Negotiated Sale. Assist the City in negotiating the sale of the contemplated bonds to the designated underwriter. In this connection, we will review and comment and advise the City on coupon rates, the bond discount, and the underwriter's gross profit in an effort to assure a satisfactory net effective interest rate. 4) Official Statement. Assist the City in the review of the Official Statement prepared by the underwriter. If a due diligence meeting Ss held, we will participate in such due diligence meeting and assist you in the examination of pertinent financial data. 5) Consults Lion/Advice. Attend any meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary, and, in addition, will be available Yor consultation and advice • until such time as the bonds issued to finance the Project have been sold. These meetings include, but are not limitetl to, work sessions and seminars and conferences with other professional consultants associatetl with Lhe Project. 6) Critical Path. Assist in the development of the critical pa to of events. 7) Attendance at Bond Closing. We will compute closing figures including accrued interest and assist Sn coordinating the events of the closing. 8) Table oY Debt Service. After the bonds have been delivered, we will prepare and furnish the City a Table of Debt BervSce which will set forth actual semiannual and annual payments of principal and interest due on the bonds. 9) Assist in obtaining municipal bond insurance and/or credit rating if such are available. rrl MVNICIPAL FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS Feea The fees for services rendered hereunder shall be based on our curren± rate of $85.00 per hour, not to exceed $2,500, plus a lump sum of $12,500 payable at the time the bonds sold to finance the Project are delivered to the underwriter. Expenses We will pay our own out-of -pocket expenses; provided, however, that if travel outside of Southern California is necessary in the £urthe ranee oi' the Project and such travel is authorized by the City, the City will reimburse us for all costs of such travel and expenses incident thereto, including lodging and subsistence. Terma The City may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice theceof to Consultant, provided that the City shall be obliged to pay us for all work performed and all direct costs incurred prior to receipt of notice of termination by us. It is expressly understood that this Agreement does not • intend to and is not under any circumstances to be construed as requiring us to perform any services which constitute the practice of law; we are employed in an expert financial advisory capacity only. If the foregoing proposal is satisfactory to you, please take appropriate action to authorize its acceptance by signing and returning the duplicate copy hereof. Respectfully submitted, FIELDMAN, RO PP AND ASSOCIATES 9(S211am L. -Fi e'.l dman WLF/pae • 93 MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL CONSVLTANTS • Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates MUNi CIFAL FINANCIAL CONSUUANTS SCHEDULE OF FEES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1985 • Principals of the Firm $BS.OU Per Hour Technical Assistants $45.00 Per Hour $O81 Buelneee Center Drive, 8u1te $03 Irvine, California 8$716 • (71{) 76$-$781 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Oa te: February 15, 1985 To: City Council dnd City Mdnager Fz om: Bv: Subject: G~~'HOyC K~~~9 x ,_ "rz ~~~~ z - -'q_ Bill Halley Director, Community Services Depar ;.went Dick Mark Project Coordinator Approval of Recomme nda lion by City Council Park Acquisition Canmi tree to Decline Offer of Land Dedication in Lieu of Park Fees for Tract Nt2902, A Project by Woodland Pacific Development, Inc. (Consent Calendar) Item "T" • Back qr ourd: The Woodland Pacific Development Corporation, who awns the eucalyptus grove known as Hermosa Grove, at the north end of Hermosa Drive, has offered a land dedication of 2.85 acres for park development, in It eu of park fees with the subdivision development of the site. The intent behind the land dedication would be to use the site for passive picnic area and frail development as the site would he located at the intersection of proposed community trails. The site is designated on the General Plan as a park site. The park concept was re vl awed by the Park Development Commission on Sanvary ~7, 19P6, with no decision or recommendation reached on the concept (2 yes votes; 2 no votes and 1 commissioner was absent). The issue was then discussed wi U the City Council Park Acouisi ti on Cammi tree members, Councilmen Dahl and Kinq, by the Community Services Director with :heir recommendation be inq to decline the offer of dedication and require the pa tk fees instead famoun ~,i nq to $41,553.92 for the 46 units proposed on the site). Recommendation: Based on that direction, it is recommended that the City Council decline the offer of land dedication for park purposes on Tract 12902. Further, it is recommended that a General Plan Amendment be initiated to remove the park des ignation from the site as shown on the City's General Plan. cc: Park Development Commission attachments ks ~~ TENTATNE DIAP - n~-~ ~. ~ TRACT 12902 ~--j' ~`, (-~: ..... _ ~ ~ P~ ~ ~ n ~ rata' ~~: i 12.1 '~ ~ i { ___ __ .~." _ ~ v~ I i __ .= r _. ~_. .-_- ~--ti I. '_ ~ - - ~~. ~ r r .. s' - , ~ ~ y :; ,. rr_~„.-~ ~ -- _ ... r . s-_-+.-.r ~ _n M .. __ ._ _.-.... .._. ._-. __ y~~_.~ .......... .. .. . i .„ q/' rL ~~.', .~a_ ~ ~ ~ ~ u~~-<-.; mgr ~!.. .. ~ • / / ~ ~ tom' . ~ . ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~ 1' '~ ~ ~n „~ i c=ry ~~ ~ __.__, ~ ~ Z~ cc a ~ ¢U i~ aoWG ~~ ~ ~~ o e° "s ~ E ~~y~g ~ g~;~ o~ i x~n n i~ ~ t i N t( a ~'.1 L"'~' v 6..J u~7 ~~ __.____QO'7._ __. _ ___. _...- ._. v • ORDINANCE N0. 248 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARYN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, KAUFMAN AND BROAD LAND COMPANY, AND MARLBOROUGH UEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, IN RELATION TO THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF BANYAN AVENUE AND THE PROPOSED FOOTHILL FREEWAY ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH, AND BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF ROCHESTER AND MZLLZKEN AVENUES ON THE EAST AND WEST. WHEREAS, the City Council, following duly held public hearings approved the Caryn Planned Community on property described Sn Exhibit "A" and generally located as described above; and WHEREAS, St has been determined that the development of the property Sn accordance with the Caryn Planned Community/Development Plan text within the City limits would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City, in that the property, developed Sn a manner authorized by the development approvals would be consistent with the City's General Plana and WHEREAS, the implementation of said developmen*. in accordance with • the Planned Community/Development Plan text within the City limits would be benef1c1a1 to the public purposes of the City, Sn that the property, developed in a manner authorized by the development approvals would be consistent with the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga passed a resolution recommending approval of this Development Agreement to the CS*,y Council NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council £intls and determines as follows: A. Government Code Section 65864 through 65869.5 authorizes the City *.o enter into binding Development Agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests Sn real property for the development of such property. D. Three copies of the proposed Developmen*. Agreement are on file in the office of the Ciry Clerk, and *,he same are public records of the City. C. The CS*.y Council has held a public hearing on the Caryn Development Agreement and notice of that public hearing has been given for the time and in the manner prescribed by Government Code Section 65867• u ~G D. The provisions of the Caryn Development Agreement are • consistent witF. the General Plan and the Caryn Planned Community text, and there is no Specific Plan affecting the property subject to the proposed Development Agreement. SECTION 2: The Caryn Development Agreement referred to in Section 1 above, Ss herehy approved. On the effective date of this Ordinance the Mayor shall sign as many copies of said Development Agreement as are necessary for the use of the parties, the City Clerk shall attest to the same and shall deliver one fully signed copy to each party to the Agreement. SECTION 3: No later than ten (10j days hereafter the effective date of this Ordinance the City Clerk shall record the Caryn Development Agreement with the San Bernardino County Clerk. SECTION V: The Mayor shall sSgn this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after Sts passage at least once in The Dally Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. MSkels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk • • ~~ ~ C `~'¢~; D Ev'c LOPRE c;~ c g~^ THIS DE'1ELO?:dE::~ AGREEaE".T (the 'Aeceement'; is r._.._ _.... entered into this day of 1985, :, _-._ _: _'! OF RAaCEG ~.. ~.,.1 G,".GA (',,. `_y,') a ^unicipal Cocpocat.., ,--_ CA 3'!:~ ..E.=.. ~?i. c.~_ _..:'.?A5Y ('Car (n,") d Cai:_.. 0:113 ,. ,, _ ;3t.on, F:A a?.°.A:: A:iG 3ROA7 _n:~D CC:1?A::Y ('K S 3.") a C3__.o[a_a Cocpo[dt:on, and :^.AR:.~CRC~G3 ..E JE~G?:: =,._ CGR?~RA:. C;: ("......, i a California cot?oration. Cacyn, K S B and MDC are sor..e t:-,es hecein referred w collectivel7 as 'Owner.' REC-JA:.S C axyn, K 6 3, and l1DC 'nave ownership in te[ests :n t:.2 red: p: ooercy descciced in Exh ioi[ A which is attached to t:,a Agreement ar.d a pact of it ('the ?[ocerty'.) On Decemcec i9, 193:, the pa[ties to this Agreement enterer into an Annexation • Ag r2enent setting £oxth t'ne conditicns ;.....: ••+n tc;: tney wou:d COn52n_ t0 t.,e 3nneX3[tOn O£ t,^.0 ?COpe[t': Cltj, Sect_on 4.: of Cne Annexation Ag:ee-~enc pcev:das Gnat as a ..,....:t:an of annexation, City slid comfit:-. she rec ms of Actic:e 3 of :..' A~.n2x3tion Agreement, and aRCh Ot:'.er pr o'J 15 ions Of Che Anne xat:on Agee ment as have yet to be pe[fr_c,e d, as a development agreement. This is t';,at deve'., cent agreement. It shall oe effective upon Cne annexation of t..e prope[t7 m City, and :~ _s adopted in co:.pliance a u n and p _suant to Secttnns 658cr a;.d following of the Government Code of ter beatings before and rev :ew by the Planning Commission and City Council of City. ~la~~iE~~ A J ~, ~ C The City has determined that the development of the Property in a manner authorized by this Agreement wound :.e • consistent with the City's General ?fan. Thec efe[e, in consideration of the oromi;es, n,..,.__ covenants herein contained, and for other good and ;uff:r an. consideration, the receipt of ~.+h:cn is nereny ackno>+:e^-~~ , _„_ parties agree as follows: 1.0 city Develannent Approvals. 1.1 planned Cornanity Zone, Text, Subdivision 'rap, and par cel Man. pursuant to California Government Code Sact:a^ 65859, City has pcezoned the residential portion of the Prooec^_y as planned Co a~munity, w:u cn zoning classif icat:on a et£ective upon the annexation of the property to the City, A planned Community Text/Dev elopmenr plan has Deen adopted oy the City fOr ?base I and supsequent phases o[ :evelopmen^_ of the • property. IC is attached to this AgreemSr= as 'cxhipit 8 d an a part of ct, Owner has submitted to the City for its aoprpval, (pursuant to Califoc pia Government Code Section 6645:), Tentative Tract Map L'o. 12642 and an application for parcel ..^..ap approval as conter..o fated Dy the Certificate of Compliance issued by the County, The resolution of the City Count.: approving Tentative Tract Map No. 12642 is attached to th LS Agreement as Exhibit C and a part of it. The resolution of the planning Commission approving 2accel Map ;;o. 8617 is attached to this Agreeme nt as Exhibit D and a part of it. As used in this Agreement, the tern "City Development • APProvals" shall mean and refer to the approvals described -2- /r ~ C ~ aoove in this Section 1.1 of the zonino, Plano=_c Co r.,can:ty • Cext/Development plan, tentative rap dppcov al, a.. par cel rap approval, and the provisions of tiffs Agr>e^.ent. 1.2 co r.r eatal ?ev:e'.+, C:t7 3CL?ea 10 ....-__C3rte dl: ^eCesSdL'j dRd 3ooL000 :ate CeV1?'A and ey3113tttn OC =.._ pot?nt131 environreatal 1^,p aCC of the deve lo_cen~ of tie P[opecty in accordance '.+i to tie Cit7 Development Approvais, and shall oe the "lead aeency' for nucposes of the California Environmental pualit7 Act. ^.he City shall cause the environmental pc xess ing and evaluation necessary for the development of Coe property :n accordance with the Development Approvals to oe ootained on a timelt oasis and in conformity a:t^ all applicaol? legal requirements. . 2.0 C'dnec's ni c'n is anr: ^u ^_ies. 2.1 R:Rht to Deye ao. O'ar.et <_... ,.: have the right to scodiv:de t..e 2cooert7 and to co r.s uuct s.-g'_e fari ly residences as contemplated oy, and suo7ect only eo the City Develocr.?nt Apo[ov als and co m.p:fiance with ?xist:ng lass anr ordinances, pcov ided Cwnec shall eor..p 17 with the provisions of _-_ uniform tuilding and safety codes of _..? City then in effect, suo]ect to the provisions of Section 2.9 of this Agreement concern:n^, fees. City shall hoc cake any action wh:ca a :n conf::ct with the deve:oorent of ^_ne property in confocr.;ty wit: Coe City Development Appro':als. City further agrees to act ~'i e'n reasonaole diligence and in an expeditious manner in cevieving and acting upon su6tnietals, applications, oc requests for peen as, approvals or other authoci2ations _~_ I© ~' C C it with the City Developr..ent Approvals. City gay, to CaliEocnia Government Code Section 65e66, app:: ne~.+ • agulations and policies for the develepmene o'_ t.._ which are not in conflict with those ruses, ons ar,d policies apoiicab'_e at the ti-e of tie C:ty ent Approvals and ahicn do nor E_..s trace the :pose of Bement, or in any other manner eater:.ally and adversely he development of the Property consistent witn the City =nt Approvals. 2.2 Reliance on Aoncov als. Cwnec shall ae all t.;~,es e 'Termination Date' (as nereinaftec defined) have the develop the residential po r :on of the Pro petty in ce with [he rules, cecu lations, and ordinances le to development of real property existing as of the the City Develo?Went Approvals, sco7ect to any ma tree, • .ion, cest::ction or approval of su c'n develoor.,ent wh: _:, pct to t.,e authority oc ;ur indiction of a governments: the[ than t^e City oc a political subdivision of the ithcut limiting the generality of the foregoing, City hat the only planning, zoning, design, density, heig;.t sons, use limitations, packing requirements, grading, pion, env iconmental, architectural and development is and requirements to be applied to the residential of the Property by the City shall be those contained :n ces and [ales and regulations in effect on the date of y Development Appcov als (as ehe same may have been the of any duly enacted vac lance or other discretionary • 'd- ~v ( ~ modification procedure eabodied in the City Development _ Approvals ), and that such standatds and cesccicc:o ns s::a.1 continue to gov ern the development of the resider-ia! pc: uon of the ?copecty is:esoective of any changes made ::_.__:___ .o such ocdiaaaces, rules or cequlations. 2.7 Deve!oo^.ent as Ao^:oved. 0'w nec ac: =_es taat :_ will not develop the Pcopecty in e. nannec mater islly inconsistent with the C u y Development Aperovals. Owner aq:ees [hat its development of the 2copecty will be sua;ecc to t.._ c esezvations and/oc dedications o[ov ided for in the final subdivision tract nap for the ?:opecty to the extent regai:ed by t'ne City Development Approvals. 2.4 Dedications. Following the issuance of the City Develoo'~e nt Approvals and the annexation of the Pcopecty to the . City, t'ae Jwnec shall offer, and the Cit; aha11 accept for ~ainrenance, (a) the dedication of ea.h -.. ;o: and ninoc [oadway on the ?:ocec ty {including wi Cnout limita.:on proposed Baryon Avenue, and "_he so-caked loop roads), and ail other puoL:c i^,p:o:eaents, as each is substantially ce r.p lured by OC on oe::al= o~ 7dnec in accordance vith the final map and i r.t:ovenent plans and the City's applicaole ouolic improvement standards and cequlations in effect on the date 'Hereof, as modified by [his Agceer.,ent, including the 5x'n ioits which are attached to it, and (b) the 'Pack Site' (as hereinaEtec deEinedl, all landscaping strips and equestrian eeails, as each of same is substancia117 completed in accordance with Cne final map plans, the City Development Approvals, and the City's applicable public improvement standards and regulations in -5- ~ ~,~ _.. C ~ effect on the date heceoE, as modified by this Agreemen^_, including the Exhibits which ace attached to it. Tae C:t; • agrees '.hat at any and all times after acceptance of dedication, and notwi Cn standing the t_caina~ion oc exo::aeon of this Agreement, and subject to sari guarantees as are set fO[Ch in Cie City's nuolic improvement ceeulat:cns as t.,_ sa r..e exist as of the date hereof, as r..odif ied by this .ogre^_nent, including the Exhibits which are attached to it, the City shall be solely responsible for the maintenance, repo:: and replacement of all portions of tie Property so dedicated oy Owner. Except as heceinabove exncessly provided, no additzonal dedication shall he required to 6e made by the Owner pcov:ded the Owner develops the Property sunstantially in accordance with the City Development Apo royals. 2.5 Smecovements. Cwnec shall _; responsible for the • instailat:on of all on-site and of `_-site _-.?r ovements cequ:red under [he ordinances, rules and cegulat:c:u existing as of Che date of the City Development Approvals, inch ding but not limited to, the provision of on-site streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drainage facilities and sewer and water service, The do ainage pattern and design criteria for all drainage improvements, the width, grade, curvature and design of all streets, curbs and sidewalks, and the conceptual and improvement plans for all other off-site improvements, requited to oe constructed or installed by the Cit7 Development Approvals shall (if in compliance with all applicable ordinances, rules and cegulatio ns) be appcov ed by City within a reasonable eime after submittal to City by Owner, and upon • -6- l05 ... C C :eceiv:ne such entitlement, Cwne[ r..ay proceed to cafe .; ,. _„ • ir..pcovements in accordance the:ew itn. 2.6 L'tili w ~asenents. °he c:ty a".^.ai: ___ _._ ___ necessac•~ aocroociate public easements Eoc water and . ___.___; as necessary to se[vice the ?coperey as :-.proved -• .c_ _...._. pursuant to this a,g[eenent; pc e•r ded, :°. o~.:evec, .,. ., .,.c _.st_o~ and agreed ttat iii easements that a:e cecu:red to ce ac ;, a ed shall 5e paid for oy Owner. 2 J Pack Site. The puo::c nark (hece:n .eEer:ed to as the '2a[k Sites) identified in the ]avelooment Plan sa_:: oe Waned •Cacyn's ?ark'. Cacyn's ?ark shall be de•:elooed :.. s uostantial conformity with the design shown in Exhio:t E attached he[eto and incocnorated herein oy ref ec once. Ca run's ?ark shall oe developed in phases as descr oed :n said Exam a • ,,. City's 7icectoc of Commani Cf Service: :;tees to rev :e•.u a:: plans, d: aw:ngs and specif icaeco.^.s Eoc ss.: pack in a pconnt ma r.n er. 2.a G:adinc. City further agrees c`at C'w her wit: :n a':e the t to commence grading upcn sec.:: .ng a g:ad:ng _ ....it, and that permits will not be denied oared on season oc date provided that Owner aq[ees to comply .~itn all City required precautions and to use due case .a grading activities and to take ceasonaole steps to prevent erosion, slippage oc danc ec pus :~.n o°_'_ conditions. 0'a nec ackn o~..:edges gnat City, pursuant to exiting grading ceeulations, is empowered to suspend oc :modify grading when hazardous conditions ace determined to exist, provided Chat City will not exercise such power if Owner takes reasonable steps prescribed by Che City to _7_ t ~ mitigate any potential damage, to assure that adjacent pcopecty owners will not be damaged, and to repair any actual damace co • the Property and all adjacent pcopecty within a ceasor,acLe t.c,_. 2.9 Fees. City and owner agree Char ^_ne C: r: 's fees and exactions far 3eveloomen[ of the Property shall oe c,od:f red as follows if due and paid before the cer^ination date of t.. _~ Agreement. a. School Fees. Fees for schools and schooling shall he paid solely in accordance with City Ordinance No. 69-C as the same exists as of the date hereof. b. Building Permit and Construction Fees. Plan check and building and construction permit fees shall be paid in accordance with the City's fee schedule as a exists at the time • Owner suomits appropc::te applications for building or contt:uctr.n permits; provided, however, that if the building and construction permit fee schedule, as it exists as of the date of this agreement, is amended to impose a fee, exaction oc imposition to reimburse the City for its costs, or otherwise defray the cost Go the City, of providing a service which is not presently provided by the City, hoc within the scope of services oc purposes contemplated by the Uniform euildlnq Coda, Owne[ shall not be obligated to pay such • -8- ~ /D 7 ... C C additional fee, chat ae, exaction oc . imposision. c. Storm Drair. Fees. Inasr,.u cn as _.._ ~___r. drains ceeuiced by the C:ty 0eveloccen. .4po:ovals exc__.. _.._ s_and__.s _: _:e .___,, no SCO [,^, d: 3::1 fees ps any '<:: d ~, .._ .._ cecc::ed of Cwner _. ?cppe: c. :s deve_-. _.. to the :ec;;:rements of the C ay Oevelop-.en^ Approvals, d. 4ecceation and ?arc ?ees. Inasnucn as _.._ 'park site" (as hece:naftec defined) ant other open spade eo pe developed and dedicated or donated oy Owner to t,.e City, meets the standards and cequi; ements of s'ne • City, no park or recrss-..on fees o+i11 ce requited of Cwnec if t..a ?roperty is developed to she City _avelopr.ent Approvals. e. '"c affic ;!i ti ration ..._ Traffic Mitigation Fee desc: iped .n Concision of Approval tip. 94 of Exaio:t 3 to the Annexation Agreemens wall pe ;educed so Thirty-five thousand do:_ars, ($35,000,00.) f. Cthec Fees. Owner shall nos oe required to ray she Cit;'s 9eautif:c3s:on ?ees oc Systems Development Pees. do other Eees or ot.^,er charges shall oe imposed upon owner in connectipn with the development of the property in accordance with ehe City Development Approvals for any of Che pucposea or -9- ~~ ~ - r ~ services men a oned in this Section 2,9 oc ioc to the 7_.„cast ion Date of this Agreement. 3.0 Assessment Districts and ?ublic Financ:cc " - - 3.1 ;4e1'_o-Roos and Lightino and Landscac :.^.a Districts. City and Cwner hereby scree to use thetr t_st efforts to cause the annexation of the 2cope:ty to (a) c.._ lay Creek Mello -p.oos Dist:ctt established and exa tin; wct h:n t.-,e City Eoc the installation, maintenance and provision of Elood control and drainage facilities, which, when constructed, w:li benefit the property, and (b) the Lighting and LandscaoLnq District established and existing within [he City so ao to provide the property with all services presently pc ovided to oche[ properties within the City by such district, The City shall consider annexation to such oth ec special benefit assessment districts as may be requested _rom time eo ti^e by • ow r,er. The aanexation o[ the property t., eac'n of such districts shall oe accomplished at Che ear:iest possible time and shall oe on terms and conditions gene:ally applicable to other p: op ecties presently within such districts, provided, 'However, teat no assessment shall be made under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act until 608 occupancy of each tract. 3.2 1913 Act Assessment District. IE requested 'oy Owner, City agrees to initiate and use its best efforts to pursue to completion proceedings pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code, for the formation of one or more assessment districts, and proceedings for the au ehorization and issuance • of improvement bonds pucsuane to ehe Improvement Bond Act of -10- ~ iov _ C C 1315, Jiv a.on 11 of the Streets and Highways Code, co ; Laance sucn improvement cosy as identified py Owner t., _,._ _- :^ t'ne request by Owner and authorized to be fLnar.ced - -~_-.~- -- su c.^. AcCS. Gwner shall advance all coscs, Lnc L,:~:nc t....s, .._ the pceparau on of er,g i.^.eecino pi3ns and specLfLCations, eccn o.a LC oc financial stcdies and teas :p:iity r=_rors, _.._ s_~.. o c'n e: costs as are necessary oc appcopn ate for t.,e super•r LSLpn and admintstrac:on of tae Lssuance and sale of assessment dis tc ict bonds. ;':;e costs so advanced s~nall 'oe ceLnpursed co Owner from [ne proceeds of the bonds issued. One ac nor=_ SeCieS OE impCOVemenCS dist[LCt bends ma'( be issued CO f:n3nte surd improve^.ent costs. However, no bo r,d shall pe issued Ln an anonnc greater taan (a1 tF.e cost of constructing those imocpv =_mencs Ldentified oy Owner to Cit_+ pins (bl amounts • incladed in tad pond issue [o cover the :. .t of financ Lr.g fees, d:s ^. punt fees, cesezve fund (not to excel; maXic,um dent secvLCe on suc^; ponds for one year), consulting Fees actendant to the fcc cation pf the assessmenc district, bond insurance ore^.: uas, bond attorneys' fees, ceir..p ucsements to Cwaac, and eenec casts nocr..a:i~ and ceasonacly associated wit'n t..a iss~~ance of suci 'ponds, 3.3 Noctcage Revenue goads, If the Gt7 initiates a program to issue moz"_gage revenue, indcst;:ai cevemue oc 51'.i i3r CrOe a...,_a or nodes, the proceeds r." which stay legaiiy he used to Finance, in whole oc in part, tae purchase by none buyers of any portion of the development of Che property by Owner, o[ the constcuceion of such development by Owner, the Owner shall be allowed to participate in such a p[ogcam. Such -11- ~~C~ ~. ~ C participation shall be based on the rules and proced eras of _.._ City applied on a uniform basis to all other develope:; w;t^;,~ • the City, and for purposes of the allocation to ce ca.= ;_. _.,_ City's 1985 mortgage revenue bond program, Ci ~~: snap n... r ed::ce any allocation that oche r.+ise woulc nave peen r.~a ce co Owner on the bases that the Property is nor yet annexe, a _.._ C it7 on the date of the allocation. If Cane:, o: ar.y of t.. e.a, elects to participate in the City's 1935 mortgage revenue rood program, the following provisions shall apply: a) The City shall not require the payment of commLtcenc fees, (other than the 1/29 deposit fee) before !larch 5, 1985. bl On March 5, 1945, Owner, or any of them, may do any of the following: 1) Elect not to oarticipa to .:. :he mortgage revenue • bond proc:am. 2) lay the co mm fitment foes. 3) Use its allocation, if any, in a separate issue which the City agrees to issue. If any Owner elects this option, Owner shall pay the applicable commitment fees for such separate issue, at such time as required by underwriter's counsel in order to maintain the allocation, and sic.al^_aneously pay any increased costs of the bond issue incurred by the City, or its redevelopment agency, together with all increased costs incurred by any other participants in the • 1985 bond program as a result of such division or -12- .. y ~ ~ I .. C c divisions of t.`•e issue. ?he anocnt, :_ ., of • sLLCh 1RCCeaa2d CO;tS, s'.^.all De deter ^, 1.^.e~ _.._ C1ty upon the :too:t of the undo:~. ntec, ?., :!a :..^.t enance Assessment ~i;t:t ....,s - __.....~ o[ tae ?rcper-7 to be dedicated 6y Owner to the 7. _; a; provided :n ?arac:a?:n 3.: :'IeCeOf S.^.a l: OZ ^3:.^.C 3:a?^ ", _.... Cit7 oc by a Landscaping and ',i yh.tia? Act of .19?~ assessr.ent dis tr.ct r.ow existing oc hereafter formed. ?he Ow ne: accees to coooecats in and consent to the fo nation of the asses;^er.t distn ct, (or annexation to an existing district ), Eoc :.._ maintenance of all sack. ?copecty, and including all of c.._ Prooecty witain the district. 4.0 Ter ^S aatior. Tat=_: ~xoiration. 4.1 ?he t2ra "Lecc,i^st:on pate" shall Wean t.._ . eat liar of (a) the fifth (5th) ann iv ecsar, of the date twat c:.e first final suodivision is act .-a? Eoc ?F.=: =_ shall ^ave been recorded in the Of_iciai Rece:'s of San __:nacdino County, or (o) pe cemoer 3L, 1990. Provided, however, that this Agreement sha Li t2c ]lin3t°_ 'wl t.n respect to each patter of the Property upon the issuance of a cecuficate cf occ-panty or release foc oecupa r,cy foc such parcel. 5.0 Review, 5.1 Annaal Review. City shall cevie•d this Ag[eement at least once every twelve month period f: or,. the date this Agreement is executed at which time Owner shall be raga iced to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Evidence of good faith compliance shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, the preparation of -13- /rte I~ ^ -. C ~ improvement plans following the issuance of the City Development Approvals, the commencement of cons tcact:ca .:?on • any potion of the ?z operty, or the periodic puoi_c advertisement for sale of single family resident:a: .... __ s+i th in the ?rooecty. Owner shall be in default uncle: t.._s Agree "tent if it provides City •with a written notice sta uc: that it does not intent to perform further under .c or :_ City makes a fintling and deterainacion following tae ocescc :b ed periodic review as set forth above and as provided in California Government Code Sections 65865.1 that, upon tiie basis of substantial evidence, Owner has not complied in good faith with the terns of this Agceeme nt. 5.2 Independent Review. It is hereby acknowledged and agreed ['mat each of the parties which comp: ae Owner will own, and as to KS3 and MDC, will develop .:ffecent pocnions of the Property. :he finding and determina:.on by City pursuant to ?aragcaph 5.1 above that one of the pa: =ies comprising Owner has not complied in good faith with the terms of t'n is Agreement shall not bind the other parties cor..prising the Cwnec and shall not affect the rights of the of hoc parties under this Agreement or the obligations of the Ci[y to such other parties unless and until City shall have independently Found and determined that each of such other parties has not complied in good faith with the eerns of this Agreement. This exclusion shall not apply when there is a deEauit by one or more affiliated owners or developers of the Property, in which case each affiliated owner may be found in default on the basis o£ such affiliation. •AEEiliated• entities are Chose in which there Ls common • -14- ~-i X13 .. C ~ ownership of 309 oc mo:e of the entities, or one o: c.._ rdns • 300 or more of another. 6.0 Remedies Upon Default. 6.1 O•.+ner's Remedies. °xceoc 35 bC b'J:ded ::1 Paragraph 6.3 hereof, this Ag; Bement shall be er.f orctat_a oy Owner notwithstanding any change in an? aoplicanle ge n~=: a. oc specific plan, zoning, subdivision oc oui ld:^: :eaulat:on adopted by Cit7 which alters or amends the rv les, ceg~aations, oC policies soecif iea in California Government Code Sections 65866. To the ex!ent perm tted by law, therefore, it is expressly recocnized that specific performance of this Agreement for the 'uenefic of Owner, and for each of Che parties comprising Cwne:, is a proper and desirable remedy in addi[:on to any and all other remedies which may be available co Cwner. • Provided i! is further agreed that Owner s-.a 11 have no nga! !o dar..a ges in the event of breach of this Ac_ea;cent by City, 6.2 City's Re-edits. City shah ^ave no ;icht to any damages or other relief in the event of a breach of this Agreement by tuner except that City may suspend its obligations and tominate this Agreement as to the party which como;ises the Owner if such party is in default, as defined in Paragraph 6.1. Provided, this shall not limit City's remedies under any other agreement with Owner oc which would otherwise be available Co it in the absence of this Agreement. 6.3 Actions of Other Agencies. If, as a result of Che laws, regulations, oc actions of Eedecal, state oc other agencies having supremacy over City, compliance with this Agreement by the City is prevented oc precluded, the provisions -16- // y .. ~ C of this Agreement may be modified or suspended so as tc comply with such laws, regulations or actions. IE, however, ;_,.: • modiEicatien or suspension substantially dept iv es eitmar of c.,_ parties of the bargained fot benefits of this Agree^enc, s,.,,,. parties small be entitled to terminate this Agreement; provided, however, prior to any such termination, Cit7 sna:: negotiate in good fain with Owner to reach a reasonaoie alternative development eF.at may be undertaken by tine Owner in lieu of the development oc eeh erwise to provide Owner with the benefit of such covenant by City whici~ is prevented or precluded by any laws, ceguiations, oc actions of any federal, state or other agency having supremacy aver City, 7.0 Amendment o[ Cancellation. 7,1 This Agreement may be amended oz cancelled in whole oc in pare only by mutual consent := the parties cursuant • to the provisions of California Gbvernmec: Code Section 65063 and the rules and regulations adopted by C:ey, (a) Any amendment to this Agreement which does not relate to the Termination Date, permi~ed uses, density oc intensity of use, height or size of buildings, provisions £or reservation of land, conditions, terms, restrictions and requirements relating to subsequent discretionary actions, or any conditions oc covenants relating to the use of the Property shall not require a public hear my before the parties may execute an amendment hereto. (b) Any nonsubstantial deviations from ehe City Development Approvals, or from this Agreement as determined • by City's City Manager, oc Diceotor of Community -16- %== X15 C C Development, shall not (to the extent not otherwisa lzgaily required) require any amendment to to is Ag:eenent nor any public heating before approval thereof by the Cit7 ':a nagr_ o[ Di[ee[or of Community Development. B.0 Fur t:~~c Assurances and Addi^_icnal ?coons o7 8.1 City shall, to t::e extent lecally pe: pitted, take all actions necessary to effectcace and impl=Went the ter^s ant provisions of this Agreement. 9.0 Notices. 9.1 Any notice to be given oc other documents to be delivered by one party to the otnec small oe delivered in person or by postage prepaid, eeccif ied oc registered mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: To City: Mc. Jack Lan • Direcco: of Commc -.:ty Development City of Rancho C~_. r.on3a 9320 3aseli ne Avzr..z Rancho Cucamonga, :alifoc r.ia :o Dane[: If to K63: With copies to: If LO MDC: If to Caryn: • Kaufman and Broad Land Company 11601 Nilsnire eou:zv and 11th Floor Los Angeles, California 9002. Attention: t1r. Cl.ide Lane Kaufman and Broad a gal Depactaent 11601 Wilsnire Boulevard 11th Floor Los Angeles, California 90025 Maclbocough Development Corporation 2029 Century Park cast Suite 1550 Loa Angeles, California 90067 Attention: Michael Romeo The Caryn Development Company 10340 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornia 91730 Attention: G~'rn -17- ~ ,. ~+ ~/~ ~ C F7i th conies to: Thongs Clack, Jr., Esq. Stradling, Yocca, Carlson S Eau:r. • 660 Newport Center Drive Suite 1600 Newport Seach, California 9266G-54~_ An7 mailed notice given as aforesaid shall 'oe deemed effective 48 hours after depos:C into tae United Slates -.a.i a~ aforesaid. Either patty hereto -.ay Eton ti ~e co c: r,„=, ty wci^_ten notice to any of the other parties, designate a different name oc address which shall be substituted for tsar given above. The change of nave oc address shall be effec^_:ve upon receipt of personally delivered or Eive (6) days after tie date of deposit of the notice into the United States nail if oy mail, 10.0 Assignment. 10.1 Owner, and each of Chen, shall have the right to assign oc transfer their respective rigb==, title and interest • .:nde[ this Agreet:ent, in whole or in par=, to any person, Eirn, roc no:acion oc entity wishout the Fcioc '•::CCen consent of City, 2n the event of any such assignment, the assigning Owner shall provide City with written notice of such assignment at least thirty (30) days pc for to such assicn ment oc transfer. The obligations of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits hereof shall inure to, the successors-in-interest and assigns of the Owners. 11,0 Entire Agreement. 11.1 This Agreement, including the Exhibits hereto, contained the entice agreement between the parties and any agreements or representations concerning this Agreement, eli• • Property, oc the development of the Property by the Owners -18- '%` 117 •. C ~ pursuant hereto, not Set forth herein shall be of no fo:ce or • effect. 12.0 Sev erability. 12.1 Subject to pacagc3ph 6,; hereof, if any t_, , condition, provision, oc covenant of this Agreement, or _.._ application thereof to any person o[ circa instance, shail ce finally held invalid or unenf occeable uy a coot of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement and its application shall not be affected and shall remain valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 13.0 Independent Ccntcactocs. 13.1 In carrying ou: the provisions of this A9ceement, Owner and City shall act as independent contractors and nothing contained in this A9ceement shall be deemed oc • construed by the parties hereto oc by any :nird person to create the relationship of principal and a:~ncy, joint venCUte[s o[ partnership. I:I t7I T:IESS t:H EREOF, this Annexation A9ceement is made and entered into as of the date and year first above written. THE CAAY;: DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Cal if ocnia Cocpocation By: Its By: ICs STATE OF CAGIFORC7IA 1 . COUNTY OF ) On this __ day of , 1985, bttott mt, tht -19- ~%• ~ //z~ nrmv nc D A Aif'un !`T'n e MnTV_ e _ _ _~',yC STAFF REPORT ~?~ ~. xi r~~ ~I~~ ~ z _ I~z DATE: February 20, 1985 ~ 19` T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AM N MEN - HAV N AVENUE OV RLAY I TRICT - An amen ment to t e n ustrial Area pecrf is an to create a Haven Avenue Overlay District located along Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street. The Overlay District will modify permitted land uses and orov ide specific design standards regarding site planning and architecture. At the last meeting, the City Council reviewed the proposed Haven Avenue Overlay District Ordinance and considered comments from the public. Following public input and lengthy discussion, staff was directed to revise the proposed Ordinance in several areas. The areas of requested revisions included the following: 1. Land uses adjacent to the ATSSF Railroad; 2. Clarification of fast food uses; 3. Clarification of Master Plan requirements; 4. Revision of Master Plan area houndaries; 5. Miscellaneous minor word changes. LAND USES: The Overlay District provisions as recommended by the Tanning Commission specify the primary land use along Haven Avenue to be of an administrative/Droffesional and office nature, with other related uses also being permitted. However, light industrial-type uses, including research and development, were specifically excluded by the Planning Commission. However, it is recognized that the parcels directly adjacent to railroad deserve a special consideratfon in terms of both site planning and design as well as land use. Based on Council's direction for more flexibility on these parcels, it is recommended that paragraph 8.1 be revised as follows: 8.1. The primary land use function along Haven Avenue i5 intended to be of an administrative/professional and office nature. liowerer, on the parcels directly adjacent to the railroad, the Planning Camaisston Aay consider additional uses penlitted in Subarea 6, subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Penlit, and a finding that ISP AMENDMENT 84-02/Haven Avenue Overlay District February 20, 1985 Page 2 such a use will be consistent with the stated design goal for Haven Avenue and other provisions of the Overlay District. This new language would enable the Planning Commission to consider other uses normally permi*.ted in an Industrial Park category, while not compromising the intent of the Overlay District. FAST FOOD USES: A request has been made to clarify the intent of the Overlay District as it relates to fast food uses. The Overlay District, as recommended by the Planning Commission, permits uses defined as "eating and drinking estahlishmen is". By definition, this includes restaurants and bars, but intentionally excludes fast food type services as a primary use. This would preclude the development of typical free standing fast food restaurants, most of which require drive-through facilities, in the Overlay District. However, fast food would be permitted as an ancillary or secondary use as a part of a larger project. Consequently, an office park might be developed which includes integrated fast food services, provided such service is clearly ancillary and in support of the primary office park use. Further, any such ancillary use would be subject to the 20 percent limitation as • defined in Section B.2 of the Ordinance. MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENTS: This section was the subject of suhstantial ~cussion by the City Council and staff was requested to address the following items: A. Redefine what "Master Plan" means; B. Ctar ify criteria to be used far Master Plans; and C. Define the role of architecture in Master Planning. Based on the Council's direction, the following changes to the Overlay District text are recommended: Master Planned Develo ment: The intent of this section is to provide or ntegrated development at the earliest possible time in the review process. Through the Master P1 an process, there is opportunity to coordinate the efforts of single or multiple property owners and to discourage piecemeal development. Finally, master planning of defined areas will avoid development of single parcels of land in a manner which would prevent or preclude future development of adjacent parcels in the best way feasible. It is not the intention of the master planning process Lo cast future development patterns in stone. Rather, it is an attempt to discover Drobtems • before they develop, to deal with issues while they can 6e solved, and to take advantage of opportunities while they exist. The standards and guidelines which follow I ~G ISP AMENDMENT 84-02/Haven Avenue Overlay District February 20, 1985 Page 3 are intended to apply to all projects and should not be constrained 6y parcel lines or specific site boundaries. C.1. A conceptual Master Plan shall be submitted for Planning Cammiss ion approval, together with any development proposal, including subdivision or parcel map applications. Such Master Plan shall address relationships to other parcels within the Master Plan area. C.2. At minimum, Master Plans shall indicate conceptual building locations, overall circulation, points of ingress and egress to both public and private streets, parking lot layouts, conceptual grading and drainage, areas to be used for landscaping and plazas, pedestrian circulation, and cannon signing. Areas intended far comaon use, such as shared access, reciprocal parking or pedestrian plazas shall also be identified. In addition, a statement of architectural intent and/or conceptual elevations shall be submitted to indicate how the • architectural concepts including style, form, bulk, height, orientation, and materials relate to other buildings or projects within the planning area as well as to the overall design goal for Haven Avenue. Again, the intent here is not to finalize design of all buildings within each master plan area; this would obviously be not be realistic or desirable. However, the architectural requirements will assure that project proponents begin to think about the architectural concept and its relationships to other buildings or projects early on in the planning stages. It will also help assure that buildings whose architecture is dictated by their use are placed in locations that are harmonious and reiate well with the remainder of the planning area. MASTER PLAN AREAS: It has been suggested that the Master Plan area of t e imme iate northeast corner of 4th Street and Haven Avenue 6e expanded to Kett er relate to existing property ownership patterns. Staff has reviewed the request and has no objections to the request. Consequently, it is recommended that Figure V-2 be revised accordingly, per attachment. MISCELLANEOUS MINOR CHANGES: Miscellaneous changes, dealing with architecture, phasing, and design quality have been incorporated in the revised text for your consideration tonight. All of the changes outlined in the report are also indicated in bold print in the attached Ordinance. ~~~ ISP ANEN D~NENT 94-02/4aven Avenue Overlay District February 20, 1985 Page 4 • R ECOt4MENDATlON: It is recommended that the revisions and provide staff with approo riate revised Haven Avenue Overlay Oistr icf and Oec laration is recommended. Res~ectfullytted ~+~- F.~ Rick G eq,....'" City P anner RG:OK:jr ,Attachments Council review the Ordinance direction. Approval of the the issuance of a Negative • • ~~n ORDINANCE NO. 249 AN OROINRNCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RME NDING PART III OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH A HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY OISTP,I CT LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RNO 4TH STREET. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The fallowing section i5 hereby added to Dart III, Development Standards and Guidelines: V. HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT Purpose The purpose of the Overlay District is to establish development standards which address the unique setting and character of the Haven Avenue corridor. The Haven Avenue Overlay District is located on both the east and west sides of Haven Avenue extending from Foothill Boulevard south to 4th Street, as shown in Figure V-1. . Rpplicability The Overlay District is to be applied in conjunction with the So ecif is Plan for Subareas 6 and 7 and provides more specific and/cr restrictive development policies, design standards and land use regulations for both Subareas 6 and 7, Tonics not specifically covered by the Haven Avenue Overlay District will continue to be governed by the regulations of the Specific Plan. Development adjacent to the Haven Avenue Overlay District shall consider compatibility and integration ~nith the Overlay District through the Master Plan process. Setting Haven Avenue is located near the geographic center of the City and will be the most significant gateway into Rancho Cucamonga. Another important aspect is the distinctiveness of the Haven Avenue corridor in relation to other major arterials designated as "Special Boulevards". Haven Avenue is the major travel route for the City and has the Dotential for high end office development with a unique combination of direct access to the airport and the Interstate 10 freeway. This provides the City a rare opportunity to enhance its image by encouraging intensive, high quality office and professional development along the Haven Avenue corridor, '1: Relation to . General Plan The General Plan affirms that travel routes are predominate elements of the community's image and encourages the distinctiveness of individual d istri~ts and roadway corridors. In addition, the General Plan states that a consistent design theme is necessary to reinforce the image or perception of a route. The Specific Plan states that the Haven Avenue corridor and the Industrial Park category should be designed to project a "campus like image for firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment with high prestige value". A. Goal Statement Goals are statements that define the community's aspiration and intentions. The goal far the Haven Avenue corridor has evolved from sessions with the industrial and business communities and with the City's elected and appointed officials. This goal represents the current conception of and future aspirations for the best interest of the City for the Haven Avenue corridor. Encourage long-range master planned • development along the Haven Avenue corridor which enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image 6y providing an intensive, high quality gateway into the City and by promoting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosphere in a campus like setting with high prestige identity. 8. Land Use Types The intent of the following policies is to encourage land uses and development consistent with the design goal for the Haven Avenue corridor as an intensive, high quality gateway into the community. B.1. The primary land use function along Haven Avenue is intended to be of an administrative/professional and office nature. However, on the parcels directly adjacent to the railroad, the Planning Commission may consider additional uses permitted in Subarea 6, subject to the issuance of a Conditional • ' P T • Use Permit, and a finding that such a use will be consistent with the stated design goal for Haven Avenue and all other provisions of the Overlay District. 8.2. Select ancillary commercial and business support service uses shall not exceed 20% of the floor area in any Master Planned deveiopmen t. Concentration of such uses in any building or along the street frontage is not permitted. 6.3. The following land use types are permitted or conditionally permitted within the Haven Avenue Overlay District. All other uses shall he prohibited. Permitted Hses Administrative and Office Financial, Insurance & Real Estate Services Communication Services Medical/Health Care Services • Professional Services Administrative Civic Services Cultural Business Supply Retail Saes & Serv ices* Business Support Services Eating and Drinking Establishments Conditional Uses Convenience Sales & Serv ices* Entertainment Food and Beverage Sales* ~~' Hotel/Motel * Personas Services Recreation Facilities Public Assembly Public Safety & Utility Services Religious Assembly *Ancillary Uses Limited to 20X of the floor area per 8.2. C. Master Planned Development The intent of this section is to provide for integrated development at the earliest possible time in the review process. Through the Master Plan process there is opportunity ~~5 to coordinate the efforts of single or • multiple property owners and discourage piecemeal development. Finally, master planning of defined areas rill avoid development of single parcels of land in a manner which could prevent or preclude future development of adjacent parcels in the best ray feasible. It is not the intention of the master planning process to cast future development patterns in stone. Rather, it is an attempt to discover problems before they develop, to deal with •issues chile they can be solved, and to take advantage of opportunities while they exist. The standards and guidelines which follow are intended to apply to all projects and should not be constrained by parcel lines or specific site boundaries. C.1. A conceptual Master Plan shall be submitted for Planning Commission approval, together with any development proposal, including subdivision or parcel maD applications. Suth Master Plan shall address relationships to other parcels within the Master Plan area. • C.2. AC minimum, Master Plans shall indicate conceptual building locations, overall circulation, points of ingress and egress to both public and private streets, Dorking lot layouts, conceptual grading and drainage, areas to be used for landscaping and plazas, pedestrian circulation, and common signing. Areas intended for common use, such as shared access, reciprocal parking or pedestrian plazas shall also be identified. in addition, a statement of architectural intent and/or conceptual elevations shall be submitted tv indicate how the architectural concepts including style, form, bulk, height, orientation, and materials relate to other buildings or projects within the planning area as well as to the overall design goat for Haven Avenue. • I ~. • C.3. The Master Plan boundaries indicated in Figure 'J-2 are logical planning boundaries based upon physical contraints and property ownership. These boundaries may be modified when it is determined that the Master Plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The City Planner may require master planning of property outside the Overlay Oistr ict, adjacent to a project proposal, where necessary to assure integrated development and promote the goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. C.4, No Parcei Map or Suhd ivis ion Map shall be accepted or approved without concurrent submittal and approval of a Master Plan to assure integrated development consistent with the goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. C.5. Architecture within Master Planned development shall have a compatible • design style with variation in the building style, form, and materials in accordance with the architectural standards of the Overlay District. Lot Size C.6. Minimum parcel size shall be two (2) acres with a minimum parcel depth of 225 feet within a Master Pian development. A 300-foot minimum lot width shall also be required, consistent with the access control policies. The Planning Cortenission may waive these requirements when it is determined that the parcel is part of a Master Plan which is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Overlay District. All lots of record are allowed to develop according to the requirements of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Access C.7. Vehicular access onto Haven Avenue shall be discouraged wherever suitable alternative access may be developed from other streets as determined through the Master Plan process. If vehicular ~~7 access onto Haven Avenue is granted, • said access shall be shared with adjacent parcels. The minimum distance between drive approaches shalt be 300 feet with 100 feet Lhe minimum distance between a drive approach and the curb return of any intersection along haven Avenue. Also, reciprocal parking and access easements shall be required, where appropriate, with any development proposal. C.B. Public transit facilities shall be considered within all Master Plans. Convenient pedestrian access shall he provided to designated transit facilities, such as bus stops. C.9. On-site circulation for both pedestrians and vehicles shall consider existing or planned circulation patterns on adjacent properties. Connections shall be made where appropriate to foster more integrated development and enhance pedestrian movement. D. Site Orientation • The following standards are intended to promote integrated, pedestrian oriented, office park development in a campus like setting: Pedestrian Orientation D.1. Site planning, including building configuration and placement, must create opportunities for courtyards and plazas and other landscaped open spaces and promote safe and convenient pedestrian movement with continuous landscaped pathways between buildings. 0.2. Parking areas and circulation aisles along the Haven Avenue street frontage are discouraged and may only be approved through the Master Plan process when it is determined appropriate and necessary to implement the design goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Their visual impact shall be fully mitigated through dispersed parking areas and • ~~~ • extensive landscaping and berming. D.3. Parking D.4. D. 5. D.6. Vehicular circulation around the rear and side portions of a site is encouraged. Circulation aisles which fragment or disrupt the connection of pedestrian spaces throughout a project shall be avoided to the extent possible. The use of dispersed parking areas which provide convenient access to buildings without interrupting interior pedestrian spaces is encouraged to reduce the need for large parking lots. Where large parking lots are necessary, they shall be located in areas less visible from Haven Avenue and their visual impact fully mitigated with building placement and extensive landscaping and berming. On-street parking along Haven Avenue shall be prohibited. Building placement at or near the streetscape building setback is strongly • encouraged within all developments, particularly on corner lots with high visibility. '^u ltiple building placement should provide variable streetscape setbacks to reduce streetscape monotony. Setbacks D.7. A 45-foot average landscape setback and a minimum 45-foot building setback shall be required along Haven Avenue, as measured from the ultimate face of curb, including existing lots of record and condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral part of a Master Planned development. D.B. Ancillary service and loading areas shall be designed and located where least visible from public view and adjacent properties designated "Industrial Park". 0.9. All existing and new utilities, including electrical service less than 34.5 KV, within the project shall be installed underground. ~~r E. Landscaping Requirements • The intent of the following standards is to enhance the visual quality of the st ree tsc ape and orov ide an attractive and pleasant working environment in a campus like setting. Minimum Landscape Coverage E.1. A minimum twenty-five (25) percent of net lot area (excludes right-of-way dedications and private streets) shall 6e landscaped areas and pedestrian hardscape plazas and courtyards. E.2. The landscape/hard scope coverage requirement may be modified for individual parcels within master planned developments when it is determined that the master plan as a whole meets the required coverage and the project is consistent with the intent and purposes of the design goal for Haven Avenue. E. 3. A maximum five (5) percent credit toward the required landscape/hardscape coverage may be permitted where appropriate public art is to be • displayed in a setting which enhances pedestrian spaces and building architecture. E .4. A consistent st reetscape design theme shall 6e developed along the Haven Avenue streetscape which incorporated intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, alluvial rocksc ape, mounding, meandering sidewalks, and appropriate street furniture. Landscaping materials shall be selected which provide an historic link to the City's past, such as eucalyptus windrows, citrus trees, and grape vines. In addition, a program of street name monumant signs shall be developed to include low profile, natural alluvial rock monument signs with individual letters formed in a sandblasted concrete face. • 13D • Berming E.5. Landscaping and berming shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the streets cape, enhance building architecture, screen utilities and buffer views of automobiles, pavement and service areas, and to define and to distinguish the pedestrian environment from vehicular spaces. 'dater Conservation E.6. A combination of water conserving landscape and irrigation techniques are required such as the use of drought tolerant plant species and hardscape (non-irrigated) surfaces, and special irrigation systems such as drip emitters, low volume stream rotors, deep watering of trees and shrubs, tensiometers to measure soil moisture, and automatic timers. E.7. Landscape materials shall be selected for their low maintenance, drought tolerance, and heat and wind tolerance. F. Open Space and Pedestrian Environment • The intent of this section is to promote the functional design and location of pedestrian spaces, and provide convenient pedestrian circulation on and off site and promote a campus like setting. F.1. The development of a pedestrian node or focal paint, such as a plaza or courtyard is required within all projects. F.2. The location of plazas and courtyards should encourage maximum pedestrian use and be separated and/or buffered from vehicular parking and circulation. Such locations may be near a prominent building entrance or along a centralized pedestrian path. Pedestrian Facilities F.3. Pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall be designed to create an attractive, comfortable, and functional setting with a "sense of place". A combination of the following design elements are encouraged, but are not limited to: pavement or Surface texture; 131 elevation/grade changes; use of • landscape materials and structures to provide shade and define enclosed spaces; seating (eg - benches, steps, ar raised planters); and outdoor eating areas. In addition, the use of water features, covered walkways, kiosks and public art are encouraged. F.4. Trash receptacles, drinking fountains, light standards and other street furniture shall be designed to enhance the appearance and function of open space areas. F.S. Convenient pedestrian circulation shall be provided throughout all projects to connect parking areas and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open spaces. G. Architecture The following standards are intended to promote a high quality office park image with high prestige identity: • Orb an Style G.1. Desirable architecture along Haven Avenue shall project a high quality progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development. While the use of a variety of exterior materials may be permitted to achieve this image; Spanish, Mediterranean, or traditional architecture styles are not generally considered appropriate for office buildings. G.2. Variations in architectural styles, construction methods, and materials for certain ancillary uses, such as restaurants and banks, may 6e permitted where the architecture is exemplary and consistent with the high quality image required for Haven Avenue and where a particular design is necessary and more appropriate considering the intended use of the building. • ~ .+ of • Multiple Story G.3. Multiple story buildings of sufficient mass are encouraged that reflect the scale and proportion of the Haven Avenue right-of-way and streetscape setbacks. Low, linear buildings are discouraged. G.4. Building design elements that are considered inappropriate for an office park atmosphere include retail type storefront elevations (linear configurations, continuous ground floor glazing, multiple doorways), and numerous overhead roll-up doors which promote concentrations of ancillary commercial and business support services, and are therefore prohibited. G. 5. Service and loading areas shall be screened from public view and adjoining properties, wherever possible, to reduce site design constraints on future adjacent development. Architectural Variety G.6. Architectural planes shall have var iati cn in depth and angle to create • variety and interest in the basic form and silhou etc= of the huild ing. G.7. Articulation of the elevation surfaces is encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns and provide variety in the building plane or surface. G.B. Building entrances shall be well articulated and project a formal entrance statement through variation of architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscaped plazas. G.9. Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjunction with variation in the major form giving elements of a structure. Signs G.10. A coordinated Uniform Sign Program shall be required for any development, including wall and monument signs. Building wall signs shall consist of 1~3 individual letters and can signs are • prohibited. The size, number, typical design and location of the signs, as permitted by the City's Sign Ordinance, shall 6e submitted with the deve looment application and be reviewed concurrently. H. Urban Centers The following standards are intended to promote the highest quality development and intensity to create conrtnunity focal points or "urban centers" near the key intersections of 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard, as shown in Figure V-1. H. 1. The applicability of these urban centar standards for specific parcels shall be determined through the ~Naster Plan review process. H.2. Multiple story buildings shall be of the highest design quality, particularly at the immediate corners of 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. Oesirab le • structural co~ponen is include steel, and concrete in conjunction with curtain walls, spandrels and glass. Wood frame structures are discouraged. H.3. A minimum thirty (30) percent of net lot area (excludes right-of-way dedications and private streets) shall be landscaped areas and pedestrian hardscape plazas or courtyards. H.4. Special landscaping and str eetsc ape design features shall be developed for the intersections at 4th and Foothill to create an intensive and prestigious gateway entry into Rancho Cucamonga and the Haven Avenue Avenue Corridor. H.S. The use of parking structures is encouraged to promote intensified development and maximize the site area devoted to urban pedestrian plazas and courtyards. Parking structures shall be harmoniously designed with the main building and located around the rear or e side Dortions of the site. 13~ • H.6. The minimum parcel size shall be five (6) acres unless waived by the Planning Commission when it is determined that the parcel is designed as an irte gral part of a master planned development consistent with the intent and nuroose of the Overlay District. SECTION 2: The City Council finds that Industrial Area Soecifis ?Ian Amendment 8-0'2 is an implementation of the General ?Ian and :ndustrial Specific Plan goals and polities and that the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan Environmental Impact Reports adequate iy cover any potential significant adverse impacts. Further, the City Council finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental imp act report is required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. Specifically, the City Council. 0.. No substantial changes are proposed in any goals or palic ies which would require major revisions to the EIR's. 3. No substantial changes have occurred with reso ect to the circumstances under which the project is heing undertaken. C. No new information on the project has become available. • SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (16) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontariu, California, and circulated in the City of .Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPRONEO, and ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1985. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: on D. Mike s, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Au the let, City C erk ~J FIG. V-1 HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT Urban Center Overlay Dlatriet TRAILS/ROUTES 0 0 0 o pedeatrlan e • • e Bicycle ~7OC] Regional Multi-Use -~ Spacial Streetacaps/ Landscaping Power Line/ Utility Easement ~•••~- Creeks d Channels n Bridge Access Points '~A`: tPark © Fire Station io , Acres ®o aoo- 'eon- r tae ,M u ~ ein <` (, V ~'TF ~~ F,- ~uOMU a' ~ a ~~ ,-•;~e; o• oe eo -~, i F / t, /- m ~ ?(a .. I I ~'w I, AT~~R0. V ~•• is ~~ "~ II e ~ s8th "i'i FIG. V-2 MASTER AREAS CIRCULATION r 120' R.O.Yd. e~ 100' R.O.W. ~~ 88' or less R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE +++-Ft Exleting ++.++~ ProPOSed TRAILS/ROUTES 0 0 0 o Pedestrian • • • • Bicycle /y, ;,d Regional ~,c" Multi-Use -~-~°~'^~^ Speeial Streeteeepe/ '^^°`°` landscaping ......:....__ Power Llne/ UtilRy Easement ....•••+ Cresks A Cl.a.mels ~ Bridge Aceese Pointe ,~ LPark ® Flre Station SLJ 10 Acres ~~~ 0• 400' B00 7600 137 rL C CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA PART II - INITIAL 5'IL'DY E\TIRONHENTAL CHECKLIST C i'"~/~ APPLIC.LS"f : ' ~Y :tG U2N~+.~s~--Q-'/~/--- ~ .y FILING DA:£: ~~ p LOG Nl.?IDER: ~~/ /c¢1hu4Lh.dN ~Q ~Z. PROJECT LOCH IO`; /LjQ1(M. ~ ~O'~[~ GL~C~/ ~~-P I. ENC'LRO::`C''NT.'.L I`LnAC'.S (£xplana[lon of all "yes" and "maybe' answers are requited on accached sheets), YES )Lal'3E NO • 1. Soils and Ge olo g:•. kill the proposal hate s:gnif icanc resoles in: a, tinscab ie ground conditions ar in changes in geo iog is relac icnsh ips? ,_ / b. Dis ru pc ions, disp lacemencs, compac cion or bu: iai of the soil ~. ~ c. Change Sn topography ox ground surface contour Sn servals? _ d. The destruction, covering or modif Scacion of any unique geologic or physical fea cures'. _, e. Any po cencial increase in wind or vote: erosion of soils, off eccing either on or off site condi cans' ,_ f. Changes in ero sfon siltation, or deposit ion? 1 g. Exposure of people ar proper cy co geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- /' slides, ground failure, ar similar hazards? __ _ h. An increase In [he rate of ex[ractLon and/or esource? e al f i ~' any m n r r use o 2. Hydrol~. M111 the proposal have signif Scant results in; page ? YES ~1AY3E NO a. Changes in Curren cs, or the course of direction of floving streams, rivers, or ephemeral scream . channels? - ~ b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the race and amount of surface vacer runoff? 1 c. Alterations co the course or floe of flood vacers? d. Change in the amount of surface vacer in anv body of vacer? e. Discharge into surface vacers, or anv al[eracicn of surface vacer quail[y' f. Al [e ration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in [he quanil[y of groundvaters, either through direct addi[Sons or with- drawals, or [h rough in serf erence with an aquifer? Quality? , Quant l[y? L h, the redo cc ion in [he amount of water o;'^,e r- • vise ova ila6le for public water supplies'. 1 i. Exposure of people or property [o vacer related hazards such as fleodi ng or sei:hes? .L 7. Air Qua li cy. Will the proposal have signif icanc res ults in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from moh ile or indirect sources? / Scat ionary sources? j + b. Deterioration of ambient air qual icy and/or Interference with the atta inmenc of applicable air quality standards? t c. Alteration of local or reg innal climatic rood itions, affecting air movement, moisture i or tempe ra [u re? L 4. Biota Flo ra. WI11 the proposal have sign if Scan[ results in: a. Change in [he characteristics of species, • Snciuding divers icy, dSscr ibu clon, or number / " of any spec ies of planes? , L - ~ / b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, tare or endangered species of planes? .. ~ - ~ ! ?age } i t YES 9AYBE 90 <. Introduction of nev or disruptive species of • plants into an area? d. Reduction Sn [he po ceniial for agricultural / production? 1 Fauna. Will the proposal have sign if icanc results in: a. Change in [he charac cezistics of species, Snclud ing diversity, distribution, or numbers ~ of any species of animals'. b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? - c. Sn[roduction of new or disruptive species of animals Snto an area, or result in a barrier / to the migration or movement of animals? - -f/ d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or w11d1 ife habitat? 5. Popui of ion. Wi'_1 the proposal have signif icanc results in: • a. Will the proposal alter the location, ~istzi- bution, density, diversity, or grouch race of the hucan population of an area? 6. Will the proposal affect existing house^.g, or / create a demand for additional housing? 1 6. Soclo-Economic Facto zs, Will the proposal have significant results Sn: a. Change Sn Iocal or regional socfo-economic charac[ eris[ics, lnc hiding economSC or co®ercial diversity, [ax rate, and property values? b. W111 project costs 5e equita5ly des [rl5ot ed among proj etc beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or prof etc users? ~ 7. Land Cse and Planning Consideracfons. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial al [e ra tion of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict vith any designations, objectives, poll[ ies, or adopted plans of any governmental ~ en[it Ses? c. M impact upon the qulaity or quantity of ~ exlating conaumpefve or non-consumptive recreaclonal opportunStlea? 'it ~~ Page 4 YES :"AYHE VO R. Transocr[at ion. Will the proposal have Significant results 1n: • a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movemen c? / L b. Effects on exist Sng streets, or demand for / new street cons [ruction? c. Effec cs on existing parking facilities, or demand for nev parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing [ransporta- CSon systems? / L e. Alterations io present patterns of cir cola- [ion or movement of people and, or goods? f. AI [eracions to or effe<is on present and poten tlal eater-borne, rail, mass transit or air [raft?c? L/ g. Increases Sn traffic hazards co motor vehicles, bit ycl is cs or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Lull the proposal have significant results in: • a. A disturb once to the incegr icy of azcha ao logical, paleoctologieal, and/or historical resources? _ / 10. Health, Safecv, and nuisance Factors. N111 the proposal have signif Scan[ results Ln: a. Creation of any heal [h hazard or potential health / hazard? 1 - b. Ezposu re of people to po[en cfal health hazards? ,___ / c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in [he event of an act idenc? -- 1 d. M increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or patheno genic organisms or [he exposure of people [o such organisms? / e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to pocencia lly dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of ob~ecilonah le odors? _ / • h. M increase in light or glare? __ ~~ l41 C- ! Page 5 YES HAYBE NO 11. Aesihe[Scs. Will the proposal have aignif Scant • results Sn: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic / vista or vlev? L/ b. The treat ion of an aes checically offensive ~ site? / c. A conflict vieh the objective of designated or poten cial scenic corridors? / 12. L't Slides and Public Services. W111 the proposal have a signli icanc need for nev systems, or alterations co [he folloving: a. Electric pove r? / b. Natural oz packaged gas? c. Communicat Sons sys Gems? d. Water supply? / e. Wastevacer facilities? / • f. Flood control structures? / g. Solid vasce facilities? r h. Fire pra[ec[Son? 1. Police pro cect ior.? r j. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational fat it Sties? 1. Na int enance of public facilities, including / roads and flood control facilities? -f/ m. Other governmental services? 1 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will [he proposal have signif icanc results in: a. fise of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? / / -- --- b. Substantial Sncrease Sn demand upon ex is [ing sources of energy? / ,~ c. M increase in the demand for development of nev sources of energy? d. M Sncrease or perpetuation of Che consumption of non-renewable forms of energy, when feas lble / renewa63e aourcea of energy are available? I ~,~ _ _- Page 6 e. Subs [antial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14- Mandatory Findings of Slgnlf icance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce [he habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population co drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of res[rici the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve shor c--tern, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well in [o the future). YES MAY HE VO . - 1 -_ L c. Does [he project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cu.-~u laclve~y tons iderable • means chat the incremental eEfec is of an individual project are considerable whai viewed Sn connection with the effects of pas[ projects, and probable future projects). d. Does [he prof ec[ have environmental effec cs which will cause substantial adverse effects / on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 1 II. DISC';HHIOX OF ENl'IROS`fftiTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of off irvat ive answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). ~((7 C ~ Page 7 III. DETERMINATION • On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, end a NEGATIVE DECLARATION viii be prepared. I find that although [he proposed prof ec[ could have a algnlf Scant I eEfecc on the environment, there viii not be a significant effect ;-~ in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the proj etc. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION l7ILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed proj etc NAY have a significant eEfecc on the envirnment, and an EWIRONDffNT FACT PORT Ss r/e9ui[ed~, Date ~ ~ ~" -' J • 14~ . OADINANCE N0. 250 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN?A, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTAICT AMENDMENT N0. 84-04 - HAYEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM OP TO ISP AND D4I FOR APPRO%IMATELY 40 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW HIGHWAY - APN: Zoe-331-01, 12, 13 AND tag-341-01. The C1*.y Council of the CS*.y of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the above-described Development District Amendment, and this City Council has held a public hearing Sn the time and manner prescribed 6y law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. • B. That the subject property Ss suitable for the uses perms *.ted in the proposed districts and the Haven Avneue Overlay in terms of access, size, and enmpatibi llty :rith existing land use in the surrounding area; and, C. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and, D. That the proposed dSstrict change is in conformance with the General Plan. E. This rezoning will have nn significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: the subject real property is hereby rezoned Sn accordance with Exhibit "A" and the Development District Map Ss hereby amended `~ accordingly. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause Erie same to be published within fifteen (15) days after Sts passage at least once Sn The Daily Aeport, a newspaper of general circulation _~ puDl.tshed Sn the City of Ontario, Calif ornia, and circulated in the City of flancho Cucamonga, California, PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1985• .yY 4 . OflDINANCE N0. 251 AN OflDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - ERPANDING THE BOUNDARY OF SUBAREA 7 (INDUSTATAL PARK CATEGOgY) TO INCLUDE APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND gAAOW HIGHWAY - APN 208-331-01, 12, 13, AND 208-341-01 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The C1*.y Council hereby Finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a pu611c hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the above-described Industrial Specific Plan Amendment, and this City Council has held a public hearing Sn the rime and manner prescribed by law and duly heard • and considered said recommendation. B. Tha4 the sub,Jeot property is suitable for *.he uses permitted Sn the Haven Avenue Overlay District and in Subarea 7 (Industrial Park Category'' in terms of access, size, a[.d compatibility with existing land use Sn the surrounding area; and, C. That the proposed Industrial Specific Pian Amendment would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properries; and, D. That the proposed Industrial $peciflc Plan Amendment Ss Sn conformance with the General Plan. E. This amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The sub,l ect real property is hereby redesignated Sn the manner state6, and the Industrial Specific Plan Ss hereby amended accordingly, SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to De published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published Sn the Clty of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of "~ Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day oC February, 1985. i 1y5c • var c~nw..v~ G~....m0 MEMORANDUM '~"~~', a . ~~~ ____~_= DATE: February 20, 1965 19 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BV: Oan Go Leman, Senior Planner SUBJECT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GEN ERFL PLAN AMENDMENT 35-02 - An amendment to the Public health & Safety Element to provide consistency with State Law Provision of the Alqu ist-Pr io to Act, as amended. The Planning Commission, on February 13, 1985, recommended to the City Council adoption of the attached Reso iution amending the Public Health & Safety Element to clarify language regarding development within the Special Studies Zones for earthquake faults. The Commission added a policy regarding notification of prospective buyers of property within Special Studies Zones of the fact that the property is located within the earthquake fault Special Studies Zone, as required by the Alquist- Priolo Act. The Planning Commission Staff Report is attached for your review and consideration. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment 85-02 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Re sect ful ubmitted, y~~f is me it P er RG :OC:ns Attachments: February 13, 1985 Planning Commission Staff Report Resolution of Approval of General Plan Amendment 85-02 /% CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 13, 1985 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner G~G,NpL C9 ~i - ~- 't iz _ ~, ~~~2 19C. I SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85-02 - An amendment to the Public Health and Safety Element to provide consistency with State Law Provision of the Alquist-Priolo Act, as amended. BACKGROUND: The Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act, as amended, is intended to prohibit the location of certain types of developments and structures for human occup anty across active faults. in order to implement the Act, the State Geologist compiled maps delineating Special Study Zones for earthquake faults. The City's General Plan adopted in 1981 includes a Seismic Safety and Safety Element within the Public Health and Safety Super Element. Portions of the policies regarding seismicity within the Public Health and Safety Element are inconsistent with the exemptions provided for by the Alquist-Priolo Act. The language in these policies need to be clarified to refer to the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act and the policies and criteria of the State Mining and Geology Board regarding development within the Special Study Zones. The proposed changes are attached far your review and consideration (new text is boldfaced). II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Parts I and II of the Initial Study have been complete y taf Based upon completion of the Initial Study and Environmental Checklist, Staff has found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of the proposed changes. The environmental impact of the seismicity policies of the General Plan were fully analyzed in the General Plan EIR certified by City Council in 1981. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The modifications to the language in these pe es wo- u-ld provide consistency with State Law Provision of the Alquist-Priolo Act and comply with the following findings: A. The Amendment does not conflict with the goals and policies of the Public Health and Safety Element of the General Plan. ITEM L PIANN ING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT General Plan Amendment 85-02 February 13, 1985 Page 2 B. The Amendment does promote the intent of the Alquist-Prio to Act, and C. The Amendment would not be detrimental to the Public Health or Safety, or cause significant adverse impacts, IV. CORRESPON6ENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Nearing in Th~Y Report newspaper, To date no correspondence has been received regarding the proposed amendment. V. RECOMMENOAT ION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider the proposed amendment to the Puhtic Health and Safety kfj}1ly~su~ tted, e a:uu:ns Attachments: Figure V-3 General Plan Excerpt with Proposed Changes Alquist-Prio to Act initial Study, Part II Resolution of Approval of General Plan Amendment .~ T r! l ~ ~ 2 2 a > V ~ N N ~ J U ~ a ~ W ~g pm 00 N o v v ~' ~ ~8 ~ W Z M 4 ) ? W lal. w ~ aN N S =N ~ y Za N v~IQ ~Q 2j W~ a p w X ~~ ¢w =Sv OW >~ ~ HW 7 as ~ N ~ O N J y w cv< ~ auai ~~ ~ oe ~ 0I W e( - -, w - ~_ lLi C7 2 ~_ w .__. I __. . vv CO r t • • ~ ~ V~ EXCERPT FROM iNE GENERAL PLAN o and welfare and intensity of use (see Table V-1. o Restrict the location of critical structures and facilities from geologically hazardous areas, unless no alternative is avaf lahle (see Table V-1). n Support seismic research through appropriate actions by all public agencies. o Require special construction features in the design of structures where site investi- gations confirm potential seismic hazards. POLICIES o Any major subdivision, emergency facility, or other type of structure tht attracts numbers of people, is open to the general public, or provides essential community services should not he permitted within an Aiquist-Pr io to Special Study Zone, as shown . in Figure V-3. o The most probable locations of future fault rupture are within the special studies zone as designated on the maps compiled by the State Geologist under Lhe Aiquist-Pr is to Geologic Hazards Zone Act. Any proposal far development of a prodect, as defined in Section 2621.6 of the Aiquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act, within TNd tddd dNdld lddlddd an Aiquist-Priolo or City adopted Special Study Zone, as shorn in Figure Y-3, shall include a report by a certified engineering geologist dA YN! 7d6dYfdd df idd1C 1[fdddS i6HdfNdJ ~fd9ldddJt Iddd@d/ltd dy Ndil dffNdr~ tNd ddtldlddtM1ddY dfddl consistent with the guidelines and criteria of the Aiquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Att. o No structures for human occupancy, other than $dd 61dNlY a single-family wood frame dt:l'd2l:dfdd dwelling not exceeding Mo stories Then such dwelling is not part of a development of four or more dwellings, shall be permitted to be placed across the trace i4AfNld ZD9 fddC of an active dr" 06xddti!Adalii dtYdlid fault YrdCd. Wdbdlfdd~d d1<Ydtidtfd .'r ~~ ~ 1dr' Ndd~dN daadpdNd;i YNdll d!z N! dddlY!! • MiYNAN 80 1!!Y 01 dN ldYf~l! fddlY Ydldll Mhere faults cannot be specifically located, the probability of fault rupture shall be investigated and, where appropriate, buildings shall be designed to accommodate foundation offsets while retaining structure integrity. (p. 236) Restrictions which apply within state designated Fault Hazard Special Studies Zones for the Cucamonga fault shall also apply to the City adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill fault. Any proposal for development of a project, as defined in Section 2621.6 of the Alquist-Prio to Special Studies Zones Act, within either Special Study Zone shall FNdJd!! d dlddfY d1 lNillYYiNdYlddB N11 d alNYJ1/!d !A@dA!lViNA @l01d@!dY dd YN! 1dddYilN d1 1dd7Y Ydlald i41YMAd YN! d!>rllddd~lNY ddld! WNl1! 1dd7Yd d1 f!Y!@dlYli! comply with the Policies and • Criteria of the State Mining and Geology Board with reference to the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act. All proposals for critical structures, regardless of location in the City, shall include investigations of the geologic and engineering conditions of the site. Critical structures include those facilities requied to maintain order and to provide emergency services following an earthquake such as police and fire stations and hospitals. Where appropriate, building design shall include allowances for offset of building foundations resulting from surface displacement. The City Building Official shall require critical structures within the City to be designed to remain functional following the maximum credible shaking at the site of the structure. o Potential sites for grade separates interchanges on existing and proposed highway construction within the Alquist- Priolo Special Study Zones should be • reviewed by the City Engineer. ii J o All proposed major utility lines, including • gas lines, power transmission lines, water distribution lines, and sewer lines, should 6e prevented from crossing a potentially active fault. Where alternate routes are not possible, facility design must satisfactorily demonstrate adequate systems of valves, switches and other equipment to minimize danger to the surrounding development. Where appropriate, such systems should include devices capable of shutting off gas flow in the event of a pipeline rupture. The City should encourage cooperation of the County and surrounding communities in a program to improve the data base of geologic/seismic information. The data base should be used as part of normal development review procedure. The data base should include information in fault locations (p. 238) o Agents and sellers of real property which is located within a Special Studies Zone shall disclose to any prospective purchaser the • fact that the property is located within a Special Studies Zone pursuant to the requirements of the Alqu ist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act. 19tl0 FAULT-RL'PTCRE HAZARD ZO\'ES IV G\LIFORSIA • APPENDICES • Data tie presented htre:n to proade City and County otTicials, pmpersy owncn. des eloptrs. geolo¢ISts, and others with specnic m(ormauon They may need to elTmh:atc the Act in aconite Because the Act cony be implemented m the local cos crnmem les<I. tt rs impaatne that the local emuivs untlas[and its snout complex aspems. ]'a parallel case of sutessida mmn¢ has hecn previously keislated in Cah(ornu, and n n cots noble that a certain amount of contwinn evert donne she initial vaecs of tmplemenmuon. Appendix A ALQUIST-PRIOLO SPECIAL STUDIES ZONES ACT Excerpu ham Ca Glarnia P~bllc Resowcez Code 660 them rc in the dganmcnt a Stale 4fimn¢ and Gcrloe}' Board mnsisnn¢ of nine mcmbus appointed by the Gos error 64i the board shall alw tcncatapalicv and appcah board for the purposes of Chapter ' S ICpmm[nQa¢ unh Secnnn 2621) a( Dnivon ] U DICI510N 2 GEOLUG I'. NI\ES AND ?tI SISG CI{A P1ER' S SPECIAL STL'DI ES ZO\ES 262. This charter shall he Anawn .cod may be curd as the Algwa-Pnaio Spatal StuJmt Zones Aa 262L5. It is the purpose of this chapter to pronde for slit adoption and admmisiraunn ui mmn¢ laws, ordinances. rules. and re¢ulanom bs ones anJ <aunb<s m tmplem<nlation of the general plan that is in ctTca m any city or taunt} The Legnla~ lure declares that the pros loons ai this chaplet arc intended In proside pnhnes and mtuia m assiv amen, counua, and vote agenncs m the exercise n( their re5ponvbJnv to prohibit the IOCd110a of d<veopmenu and gructurtt for human occupancy across the trace of agts'c faults as defined by flits board. This chapmr n applicable to any project, as dcHred m Secnnn 2621 b, upon issuance of the oRaal tp<ual studies zones maps to attceted local Jumdicunns, but does nut apish to any Aoclop~ mein nr structure in eaucnce poor m }Lis q, ITS The im~ plemematmn of shrc chapter shall be pursuam in fnhcies anA erucna estabhsheJ and adapted h•, iho Stale 1linma unJ Geoh og) Huard 2621 n rat Aa nod in this charier. "prnicn" cocain f I I Am submttsion nl Ian) which n wbJrct to flit 5¢hJhl~ Sion Nap Act, Dn nion 2 Icmnmennng wuh Secuan 6611111 of Tul¢ ' nl the Gna crnmem Crde. and whmh cantemplata the eventual construction of ervemres (or humor oxupancy (2) Structures I'or human ~u vpancy, with the exception oP (AI Sin¢le-(amdy wwxl frame dweldn ¢s m he bulb pit parcels of land (or which g<nln¢ic reports haw hecn appnssed pursuam to the prosiaons of para¢mph I I7 a( shrc wbdineon. (BI A angle-family wood inmc dwelhne nits <uccdine tun stones when oath dweihn¢ rc not part o(a;ladopment ul (ous or more duelhnes. Ibl Fm slit purposes pi this chaptxr. a mobdchame whose body width exceeds cabs feet shall be considued to be a sin¢le- (amily wood frame dwelling nor acceding :uo unites DIVISION I ADNI\'ISTRA iIOV CHAPTER ]. DEPARTJIENT OF CONSERb'ATION Aru¢le J State Mmm¢ and Geoloey Boatel and slit Dnition of ?Loin and Ga•lo¢v 2621 '. This chapmr, exetpt Secnnn 2621 v shall nos apnly to the ennversian of an arcnn¢ aparimem complex into a condo- minium, This chapter shall apply to projects which are located within a delineate) spemal studin zone. 262'_ In order in assist cities and <nunhes in Cher plannma. zonin¢. and buildin z-re¢ulanon functions: the State Gcolo¢iat shall delineate, by' December 7I. 19)J. appropriately wide sae aal studies zones In encompass all petcntiaiiy anJ recently aan< trees of the San Andreas, Calawsns. Hayward. and San tannin Fwlts, noel such ,vher faults. nr a¢ments thereof, as he deems su~nendy acme anJ cell vl<Ened as to conavute a potential hazard to nrucmres from surface faulting or fault creep. Such special studies zones shall ordmanly henna-quarter indent less m width, acept m areumstanccs whmh may rtquire the Slate Geoloeiv m devenate a wader zone Pvrsuani to shit swoon. the Stale Gealneut shall compde maps Jehneab n¢ the spe<:al atidies tones and shall wbmit wch maps m all etT2cred abet :aumms, and stain a¢ennes. rim later thin Oe~emher il, lo'i, for res law .tad anmmem ConcerneJ 7urndiclnim and a¢encim shall whmn all inch ¢amm<nts m the Stale Slininz and (icilagy &tord for res feu anJ consiJcmupn wnhut aO Jays µ'nhm w0 dots of wch revww.the Stau GCOlo~ gtv shall pros ide copses pf the ntTcial maps to concerned lute agenacs and w each toy or wunry' haling junsdinion aver lands lying within any wch zone The Stat<GmingiN Shall continually review new geologic and xrcm¢ Aata and shall revrce th<specul studies zones or delineate admhonal special smdRS zones when warranted by new m(or mauan. Th<SUtc Geoingrcl shall submit all revised maps and 26] I n :\ parv,.. who R acting as an a¢ent fur a teller of tea' prcpcny winch ~.. ocatnd within a delmcatcd special Hud¢s zone or slit seikr.f he is atone without an a¢cni. shall disclose to any prnspectne purchaser the fact that the property n located within a dehneatcd speaai .tuAies zone '_b'1.3 This chooser shall not apply to ahermmm or addivons • to am ercc!ure ss ~t bin o special studies vane the value o(which dots not <rrcd `'. percent nl the salve of the stmnurc. • CAUF00.SIA DR'I510V OF MMES ASD GEOLOGY' uldiunna l maps m al l aRtctee goes. eoumms, and stain aarnci<s for then rev¢u and vmmtm Concerned lunsd¢nons and agenaa shall suhmn all wch comments to the Stale Mmmg antl Gealnes Bnartl (or revmw antl consideratmn wuhm o0 days. K'uhm u0 days ui wch rn'iew, the Slam Gmineisl shall pmcide copin of the revved and addmonal oRCUI maps m cnneemetl dale ugtncia and to each mtv or county hannglunsdmuon user Ia W+ Is m¢ unhin .m +uch zone. 2h2J The approval of a pro7<cI by a mly or counq~ shall be m arordance nnh pohaia and cnicna eslabllsh<d by the State Mmmg and Gtolpn Board and the tindmgt of the Slam Gmin- grsi In ihe Jes elopmem of .uch pnhmes and :rnena, the Stain Sfimne and Geology Board +hall w<k the comment and atlucc of a17ratd atles. cnuntia. and slam a¢enna, Coles and counucs shall regwm. ^nor to the appro. al n1 a prof«I. a ¢tolomc report datinine and Jehntaling om~ hazard of suria<e fault rupture If the atv nr County li nds that no undue hazard of Ihis kind exrcn, :he ¢roloem report ~n wch hazard may b<warved, wnh appros ai OI•the )late Gtoln¢IN A(tcr a repan lus heen appros ed nr a warm ¢ranttd. sub¢~ quint eeo!oeic repnrn shall not he requiretl. prosidetl that new geoln¢m Jau warranun¢ further inmsogariont is not recorded SP i2 2621 \nthingmlhls chapterrzmmnded to prevent ones and counoes Irom a[abhshmz pobcros and cmm~a which are stncter than !hose established by Ihrs thapi<r nr b. the Slate Mlmng and Geology Bnurd. our irnm impo+ln¢ mid crollecnn¢ (ca :n adtli. non to Ihos< «quired untla this Chapter .6?S Cal 6th applicant fur apprawl of a protect may b< charecd a reasonable fee q the cu y or county hasing)unstllxuon over the prolevI. (bl Such f<es shall be ¢t m an amount tulTivlent :n meet, but not ro cs¢ed. the culls :o the nry' or county al admimsrenng and complyin¢ xrth the prosivons of tins chapter Ic) The ecoloeio report rcgwr<d by Section :62J shall be In wl7mem Jemll 0., meet me <rrtena and pohaes <smbhshetl by the Stmt }fining and Geelo¢y BmrJ for indnidual parcels of land. :670 In carry log nut the prm alum of this chaplet. the Stain Gcoloeut and the buaN vhall b< aJvrsed by the Snsm¢ Safeo' Commisvon. SIGSF.D IVTO LAK' DECE}1B[R ':. lop^. ,qME\DED SF.PTEM BER ]b. 19'a, MAY i, l0'S. SEPTEMBER ]g. 19]5, SEPTE\I BER ::.. 196 ASD $GPTEMHER -', loT9 u Appendix B POLICIES AND CRITERIA OF THE STATE MINING AND GEOLOGY BOARD • Wifh Reference to fhe Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Ac} IEuerph Irom the Collfornia Adminishorn< Code. TRIe la, Dlvhmn b, Chapter d, Subchapter 7, Article III) Jbi),7 ISTRODCCTIOS The le¢islawre has Declared in Iht AlVmso- Pnnln Spenal $IUJIes Zones Acl that the State Geolo- gist and the Stine Mlnine and Gtuingy Board are chareed under the Act umh the ;apomihihiy a( auiuing the Qties. Counties, and 5'alt agennes in the csercne J(Ihar resppnsibJrty to prn- rideiorlhepuhhosaia) m hatarduus (auh zones, Asdai¢naud by the Act, the pohun and en«na set forth hennaller are Limned b hazards resulim¢ from wrlace faulting or (auh :rezp 7hn hm Jannn Jues nm imply Ihat rnher ¢calo¢m hazards are not nnpnrom anJ Ihar such ether hazards should not be convd~ Bred m the total es alum ion of land sa(eIy Impi<mrniahon u(Iht Aldw,i-i'rinlo Spaial Snidms Tones An b) nlecieJ C~oe+ antl Gvinm's Inli is only a portion nl the «qm rcmcnl irr ihcve i-. „inlet anJ Cron In prepare +awut ~.rlcr. anJ vlcn eitmenh tit that General plant. punuam la Sesnon n5)p: ,(I anJ Ni0` I nl the Gowrnmem CVJe The sp<a.il ,ludin nat+. meuhtr wuh Ihec poie'ies and rnwna. shnutJ h¢ in nrprrand min ihe Inul uismm safety and +afnv elem¢nts tit the ;enaal pl.in The Slate Genlucul has cnmpi IcA and rs m I he prows of mmpil. mg maps dehntsn nz spenal studms zones pursuant la Section 2fi2: o(the Puhiic Resources Code The spenal stadia zones devgnated nn the maps are based on fault data of vaned quality. 11 Is eFpccted That ihe maps will be tensed as more complete grolog¢al information hccomes available. Also, addwonal spe aal swdl<s zones may b<dthnealed m the (inure. The Board has certain «sponsibiluies regarding renew and consideration of those maps poor m the time That they arc finally determined. Cibes. Counties and Stale agenaa haw certain opportumha under tht Aa to t,`mmem on the preliminary maps provided by the Stare Geologist spa Iliac Policies and Cntena. Certain procedures are su¢¢c+tetl herein unh regard 1o Ihos< respan- sihiLnes and Commtnis. Pleose nett that ihe qcl i+nrn retina vse ISeaton ;b;l ! n(the PuhhC Resourc<r Gidel II applies w esen proposed new real eslaiG dmelopmeal or vrucnrre fur human aeupancy thin mn- slilules a "prol«Y' ss JelineJ under Section :621,6 0l l he Public Resources Cwle. J601 REVIEtJ'OF PRELIMIy1AR1'NAPS. The State Mim mg and Geology Board suggests teal each rerlewmg gpv<mmen- tal agency lake Iht following veps m reviewing the preliminary mdps SYlimllled fJr 111<rr CopVderallon'. I v 1950 I O fACLT-R6'PTCRE H:\Z.ARD ZO\'ES 1\ CALIFORSIA All praputy owners anhtn the prcliminan .penal studies zones mapped by the Slue Gevlv¢ist should be nobtied Dy the Ctbcs and Counties of the inclusion of that lands within said prebmmary spemai uud¢s zones by pubhcavon or other means deaencd m inform stud properly ox nets Such nomicuion shall not of necesttry regmre noblieanon by tors ¢e or by mall. Thts nonli:umn udl pcrmu aBected propcrry awncn to presem geola¢tc es idenm they might hm¢ rdauve !n the preitminan, maps. Cu¢5, Counties, nntl State aeenge5 arc crcourazed to examine tF.e prdiminen maps dclineaung special smd~ ms zono and in make rmommendauona. a:cpmpenieJ by supponinR data and diuuwons, w [he State SLmne and Geulu¢y Rinrd for mndtlicauvn of said zones m ae:orJancc xnh the stature and urthm the ume penod Speciti2tl Ihcfmn. For perposat ui the :\ct, the Smt< 1ltnin¢ and Geola¢y Board :ccJrds iauits which base had wrfaoe ditplace- ment uahtn Holocene nine lotion the iasi ILL+00 ycvnl Js actnc and hrns its conamuung a po¢mml huutl L'pon wbmnaon ni sausfacasy eeoloes evo- dente that n iauh shnxn xnhin a special wadies zone has nor F.JJ satiate dtspiacement x'vhm Holocene ume. Jnd that is not deemed carve, the blimn¢ and Gmlo¢y Board may recommend to th<State Genlo¢ty that the bnundena of the speci,9 studtes zone be upprro pnamq moJiticd, The dcfimuon of aane fault is intended m represent minimum en¢na only for all structures Gnes. Coun- ucs anJ State agencros may xnh to tmpme more re- vn:use Aetimnans rgwnng a loner ume penod of Aemrtntmmd absence u( dtsplJCC:nrnt fur :nhcal stni;;ures web as bleb-nsc hu~~ldin_s, hapu ah, and schools 7 NJ: SPECIFlC CRITERIA The inlicui.^.g apen(u and de~ Laded .:rnena shall apply within apeaal studlcs nines anJ shall be includcA m any plannin¢ program, ordiwnec. rules and reeu. lahans adup¢d by Cwcs anJ Cnunucs pursuant to said Spcaal StuJies Zones Avt • fa) ]o structure for human occupancy. Idenntied as a pro7en under Sttuvn Jb:l h of the Act, shall he per mated u+ be planed acrow the trace of an aane fault Furthermore, the area wnhm fifty (501 feet of an active IJUh shall be assumed to be underlain by active branches of ilia. (cult unless end until prm<n other wise by nn approprintc geulag¢ invau¢umn and sub mission of a report by a ¢enlugtst rc¢tsmred :n the Stan of Ghfornta. This SO foot standaN is intended to rcprarn[ minimum totem only for Jii struaurm It is the opinion n(th< Board that 'ertain <ssenual or cantor st rucmrcz. such .u high-rise hwld'~ocs. hospt~ tars. end s:huois shnulJ he wnieetn more restrn;nse cntena at the Jiscrsitau of Cain and C'aur.ucs Nore~ over, u o re<nnnnendcd that a ecologic report by J genln¢nt rv:gtttered in the State nl Cditlrrnia he r: gmrcJ for a ttnclo-(amih Ju clime olhcrw we cxempo cd unJCr Sccuun :621 6, d that st runurc lies nn or wuhtn II)n fact vl'the trace afan hiVnncaih aane nr other known active fau11 as thuxn nn Special StuJics Zonn Naps nr by more grease or deladeJ ininrnu~ non known to the apprm mg authonty (b) Apphcminn im a da elopmcm pcrmn far any promo (as delined m &cam lb:I b t ut(mn a spectel.mmes zone shall he acn+mpamed by a eerloeic report rte . parui bye ¢eoioent rcgatered m the Sta¢ o! CJidnr ma. and JircctN :n the problem of pumm:.tl sariJ:e fault drcpiacemem throu¢h the proleu st ;, unless such repon is uan eel punuam to Semm~ ~1b:3 (cl One t I) :npy o(all such eailceic rpnrts shell he riled with the State Genlu¢is[ by the public bads ha~ine lunsdmnon vnhm thvt}' days iciloumz arep4rv_e br the appro. ine pund¢nnn The State Geoingu; shell piase such rcpom on open tiie fd) Agcoloast re¢ttacredmthe Smte vi Caidornla. vith~ retained h.' itch Cttv or C,unry, mm; emluate the geoloetc reparn regmred heron and adsite !hc body hmin¢ yunsAmnon Jnd authanq (<1 Coles and Counties may esmbhsh pnhe¢s and cntenv which arc more r<stnc:ne than :hose esubinhed heron. In particular. the BuarA beheses that cnmprr hcnsnc eeoloeic and en¢ineennz qudtc should be reyw«d for any "cantor" nr "cr :nuul" structure m presmusiy AetineJ xhether or not i; n ideated urthin a spcnal smdics tone f0 In azeordanee wvh Secuvn _b:! of the Pnbhc Ro sources Code, each apph:ant Wr apprmal ul'a prn)cct within a ddmealcd spcnal vudia zone ma} M char¢ed a reasnnablc fee by the Cu} or Count} havln¢ junsdmnon over the pro)eet. (el As use:: heron the 4allou me delimnnna apply • (I) \ "p ro;ect" includes am svu::ure for human ' uupancy nr new reel esmic An eionmcm as delined under Scuinn ]a71 4 of the Pobli: Re~ s, ~J res Cudc. f:) A'nrun arc Inr human n;rJpancy" tt a build mg, as Jelined by the lmfvm Bwldln¢ Cade, wh¢h it cspecmd rn lime a banal n<cuoavcs rate nl more than :.rNa7 man hours per year (J) A "new real euate des elnpmetn" Is defined as any new dcselnpmem nt real pmpem xh¢h cunmmplaies the esenht.d comvvninn of "vruaur es Wr human accapanev" (q) "Sinn"IS ilia delined by theCmform Bwldln¢ Code Fur th<purpvses of the Aa. the number of .:ones m a building n equal to the number of htumt ilonr les era, pro kN ilia anv Icseh which Jilkv from each other by low Ihan tvn feet shall he considered .u one Aislmct les el (5) So change to me or chanacr ni nccupanvy. which resvln m the tom coon of a hvd Jin¢ nr st rv:;are trsm me nor imenJcd for human na capons. its ~;nc Nhlch is sit mtendeJ. obeli he permuted unrest the hmldm_¢ nr structure com~ phas xtlh the pros pions ni the AcL (h) It n recnmmtnded that Citio and Counnet nansler speaal studtes tyres m(drmalmn to maps of tmlahl< scale shnwm¢ Icgal property boundutes, wnh adnce • from the Cahforma Uivnton of Nines and Gmlogy if needed. a an aid to show the xoncs at the parcel level. li 1 It is manded that all State and regional agencies haw. mg appnnal awhonty for pro)ects defined m Section : ~.j 2621.6 shall comply wnh all provlnons of the Act and these Pohnes and Cntena. ADOPTED tiOVEMBER 2J, 197 J, REVISED 1CLV I, 1974, 1L'YE 26, 1975. A4D 1AYUARY J1, 1979 u C C FILI?~G DAT°• ~ ~S~~J/fLpOC ~'L'."3 Lti: S.S ~Zi PROJECT: ~~{{ f~/,~(j~//~ O~O~~ ~ ~.I?~ PRGJEC- LOCAT;O:L• A//~ I. EVTIRr1?~'1:T,L I!L~;1C':S (Exp lana[ion of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are zeGu i:ed on attached sheets). YES >145'E' ti0 1. Soils and ^,eo to e^. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. L'nsc ab le ground conditions or in thar.ges in geelogic relationships? 6. Disruptions, disp lacemencs, compaction or / burial of [he soil? t. Change in topography or ground surface / contour Sntervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification / of any unlGue geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or va[ex erosion of soils, affecting either on or eff ` site condito ns? 1 f. Changes in erosion sil cation, or deposi[Son? / / "'ttt g. Exposure of people or property to geolegic hazards such as eart;tq wakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An Increase Sn the race of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? 1 2. ydro loev. 17111 [he proposal have significant results in: ~~ i_ CITY OF RA.\C!?0 CCC:y`!0\G+ PART II - L7I'IAL SiCDY' E11'IRO\?'?'\TAL CHEC:iI.I ST l- l ?age YES "_4YBC AO a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction • of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral strean chann_ls? b. Changes in absorp[1 on races, drainage paCte rns, or the rate and amount of su-:ace water / runoff'. c. Alter ac ions [o the course or flow of Good waters.' / d. Change Sn the amount of surface water in any / body of water? -(~/ e. Discbarge into sur.""ace va to rs, or any alt erat ion of surface cater quality? f. A1[erac ion of groundwater characteristics'. g. Charge in the quantity of groundwa[ers, either through direct addi[ie ns or with- drawals, or through in [eTference wits an aquifer? Quality? Qu anci[y^. _ h. She redo cc ion Sn [he amount of water c:.".e r- / vise ava liable fo: public water suppli~=s? / i. Exposoce of people or prnpe ry [o eater / related hazards such as flcodin3 or seicbes? V L 3. Alr Oua li :~~. Will the proposal have significant res ults ic: a. Constant or period iC air emissions from mobile / or 1r.direct sources? Stationary sources? Y' b. Deterioration of amb lent air quality and/or interference with [he atta irrent of applicable / air quality standards? -~ -4/ c. Alterat SOn of local or regional cllmac is conditions, affecting air movement, moisture / or t¢mpe ra to re? t/ 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have sign if icanc results in: a, Change 1n the tharacterisilcs of species, including diversity, distribu clon, or number of any species of plants? (/C b. Reduction of [he numbers IE any unique, rare of endangered spec les of plants? • C f l ?age 3 YES :AY3° SO t. Tnc roducclen of new of disruptive snec!es of / plants info an area? L/. d. Reduction in the po cenc!ai for agricul rural / production? _ Fauna. Wi11 the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the c!;araccei is[ics of species, inci ud'_ng dived ir:, disir ib ut ion, or nuah ers oz dry species of anica'_s^. _( b. Reduce SOa of the nu`hea of any un true, rare /~ or endangered Species of animals'. L c. Inc reductian of mew oz dis:u?Live species of animals in co an area, or result in a barri e: / to Che migtacian or sovemenc of animals? 7/ d. Deterioration or removal of existing Eish or / / wildlife hab iCac'. ,j/- S. Ponula[ion. Wi11 Che proposal have significant resuis ia: • a. Will the proposal alter the locatio r., list =- butien, density, diversity, or growth :ate o: the human popui at ion of an araa: ,_ _ b. Will the prepesvl affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing'. 6. Socio-Econonic Fat to s. Will the proposal have sig.^.ii icar.[ results in: a. Change in local or regional sotto-econemic characceris[ics, ittcluding economic or commercial diversity, tax race, and property / values'. _ b. W111 project costs be equ12a61y dis[r ibu[ed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, / tax payers or protect users? 4, ). Land L'se dad Plann int Cansider at ions. Wil: [he p re pe sal have sigraf is an[ tesul cs in: a. A suhscantial al[e ration of [he present or planned land use of an area? -- b. A conflict vlth any designations, objet Gives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entitles? _ _ ~ ~ . 1 e. M impart upon the qulai[y ot? gaanti [y of / exl5 ring consump[SVe or non-consumptive rec re..t tonal opportunities? __ ,_ C ~ Pa2e 4 YES ?LL 'i :: Vo 8. Transoertari vn. Will the proposal have sigr,'_.'ican[ • resul cs Ea: a. Generation of substance al addit!anal vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing st: eecs, or demo nd Eor nev street consttu ct ion' / C c. Effects on existing parkins .`ac li ties, or /~. demand Eor nev pa rk ir.g? / d. Subscaa ial lcpacc upon existing transpor[a- ticn sys [ems? e. Alterations to present patterns c: cir c:aa- t1or, or movement of people and!cr goads', / f. A1[er ac ions to or affects on present and potential va ter-borne, rail, mass trans is or air [:off ic? / g. Increases Sn traffic hazards to motor vehicles, 6ic:clis[s or pedes [r ions? 9. CuL `ural Resources. Will the proposal have s ie nic icanc results in: • a. Adis tutbance to the intagri^: of atc :c oiogica 1, paleontological, and/or his mrical resources? / 10. Health, Sacet v, and nuisance Para-s. Will [he pm po sae ;;^,ave signiticant tesuis in: . a. Creation of any health hazard or potential heai ih hazard.' / b. Exposure of people to paten teal hen lch hazards? - __ c. A risk of explos ivn or release of hazardous substances Sn the even[ of an accidene? d. M increase in the Hums er of Snd is Ld uals or species of vector or pacheno genic orgynisms or the exposure o; people to such organi;rs? / e. Increase in exist ing noise levels'r f. Exposure of people [o pocen[ially dangerous noise levels? _- / g. The treat ion of obj ec clonab le odors? _ • 1 h. M Increase !n light or glare? _/ __ Paga i C YES u4Y3E 40 _ 11. Aes ihetScs. Rill the proposal have sSgnif Scant results in: a. The obstruction of deg: ado tlon of any scenic / V iSCd OY VS¢w? -- ' -- - b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive 1 site? -- -- c. A conflict vi[h the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? ,. 1Z. L't pities and Public Services. Rill the proposal have a sig^,if icanc need for new sy seems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power' h. tiatural or packaged gas? CoYm:unications systems? c . d. Water supply? e. Waste%aver facilities? -- • f. Flood control structures', g, Solid vas to fat i'_i:ies". h. Fire protection^. -- - 1. Police protection? - - 3. Schools? ~- - / / k. Parks or ocher recreational Eac ilicies? 1 1. Tfaint enance of public fat i11i1es, including roads and flood control facilities? _. / __ m. Ocher govern rental services" -- - 13. Ener¢v and Scarce P.esou rtes. Rill [he proposal have sign :.f icon[ results in: a. L'se of suh scandal or excessive Eue1 or energy? _- b. Substantial Snc tease in deuaand upon existing sources of energy'. - -- c, An Sncrease Sn the demand for development of / new sources of energy? d. An Sncrease or perpetuation of the consump [ion / of non-renevab le forms of energy, when Eeas ib le renewable sources of energy are avallab le? _ ___ ~ ., v r ~ 7age 6 YES 4AYE= ti0 e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? _ 14. yand ate rv Flndin¢s of Signif ica^.ce. a. Does [he project have the pOten[Sa1 to degrade [he quail ty of [he env ironcent, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop b elov self sustaining levels, threaten co eliminate a plant or animal coccunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or el icinate important ezamp les of the major periods of California histor}• or prehistory? _ b. Does the proj etc have the po cencial [o achieve short-term, [o the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-ten Smpa cc on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- / term impacts will endure well Sn[o the Future), -f/ c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable • means chat the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in tonne U ion with the effects o.' past proj eccs, and prohah le future proj etcs). ____ d. Does the project have env ire.^menCal effects which will cause substantial adverse effzccs / on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISC°SSiO): OF ESCT&05:AII::TAL EVALBATIOS (i. e., of affizma Live answers to [he above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). • L•- ( C Pa 3e 7 III. DETER`1IVATIO:; • On/he basis of this initial evaluation: ~I find [he proposed project COCLD NOT have a sigaif scant effecc on the environment, and a NEGdiri% DEC1.\R.iTIOV will be pre?aced. _ I find [hac although Che pzapos ed project could have a significant ef: ect on the envizonvent, [here will no[ be a significant etfecc ~I in this case because the micl3a [ion measures described on an attached sheet have been added to [he project. A C7EGATI~T DECL.lGTIO:d WILL BE PREP:V2EJ. C I find the proposed proj ec[ Y em..i:raent, a~n/d an Ehti'I RC :'>'~'V" Da[e_ ~ /~//g7 • /-I RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 85-02, AMENDING THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN, TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is necessary to provide consistency with State Law provision of the Alquist-Priolo Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of February, 1985, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the Amendment does not conflict with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan. 2. That the Amendment does promote goals of the Public Health and Safety Element. • 3. That the Amendment would not be detrimental to the public • health or safety or cause significant adverse impacts. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission recommends that the following seismicity policies of the Public °ea lth and Safety Element, starting on page 236, be changed Lo read as follows: o The most probable locations of future fault rupture are within the special studies zone as designated on the maps compiled by the State Geologist under the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Naz ards Zone Act. Any proposal for deve loDment of a project, as defined in Section 2621.6 of the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act, within an Alquist-Priolo or City adopted Special Study Zone, as shown in Figure V-3, shall include a report by a certified engineering geologist consistent with the guidelines and criteria of the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act. o No structures for human occupancy, other than a single-family wood-frame dwelling not exceeding two stories when such dwelling is not part of a development of four or more dwellings, shall be permitted to be placed across the trace of an active fault. Where faults cannot be specifically located, the probability of fault rupture shall be • `nvestigated and, where appropriate, buildings shall be designed to accommodate foundation offsets while retaining structure integrity. IC... Resolution Yo. GPA 85-02 Page 2 • o Restrictions which apply within state designated Fault Hazard Sper, ial Studies Zones far the Cucamonga fault shall also apply to the City adopted Sn ec ial Studies Zone for the Red Hill fault. Any proposal for development of a project, as defined in Section 2621.6 of t'ne Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act, within either Special Study Zone shall comply with the Policies and Criteria of the State ~'dininq and Geology 4o and with reference to the .Alquist- Priolo Special Studies Zones Act. SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission recommends that the following seismicity policy be added to the Public Health and Safety Element, starting on page 238, to read as follows: o Agents and sellers of real property which is located within a Special Studies Zone shall disclose to any prospective purchaser the fact that the property is located within a Special Studies Zone pursuant to the requirements of the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act. SECTION 0.: the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on • February 13, 1935. KO'd, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65"55 of the California Government Code, tht the Planning Commission of the Ci±y of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 13th day of February, General Plan Amendment No. 85-02. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt General Plan Amendment No. 85-02. 3. That a Certified Copy of this ,4eso lution and related ma teriai hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF FEBRUARY. 1985. PLANK CNG COMMISS [Ofl OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary ~7 • RESOLUTION NO- ° ' '^ ^ao - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPP,OVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85-02 AMENDING THE PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is necessary to provide consistency with State Law provisions of the Alquist-Pr io to Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOL VEO, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council has hereby approved the following amendment to the Public Health and Safety Element of the General Plan. SECTION 1: The seismicity policies of the Public Health and Safety Element, starting an page 236, shall be changed to read as follows: o The most probable locations of future fault rupture are within the special studies zone as designated on the maps compiled by the State Geologist under the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazards Zone Act. Any • proposal for development of a project, as defined in Section 2621.6 of the Alquist-Priolo :aecial Studies Zones Act, within an Alquist-Priolo cr City adopted Special Study Zone, as shown in Figure V-3, shall include a report by a certified engineering geologist consistent with the guidelines and criteria of the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act. No structures for human occupancy, other than a single-family wood-frame dwelling not exceeding two stories when such dwelling is not part of a development of four or more dwellings, shall be permitted to be placed across the trace of an active fault. Where faults cannot be specifically located, the probability of fault rupture shall be investigated and, where appropriate, buildings shall be designed to accommodate foundation offsets while retaining structure integrity. /~ ~~/ Resa tution No. P-2-20-04R Page 2 o Restrictions which apply within state designated Fault Hazard Soec ial Studies Zones for the Cucamonga • fault shall also apply to the City adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill fault. Any proposal for development of a project, as defined in Section 2621.6 of the Alqu ist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act, within either Special Study Zone shall comply with the Policies and Criteria of the State Mining and Geology Board with reference to the Alquist- Priolo Special Studies Zones Act. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comanission recommends that the following seismicity policy be added to the Public Health and Safety Element, starting on page 238, to read as follows: o Agents and sellers of real property which is located within a Special Studies Zone shall disclose to any prospective purchaser the fact that the property is located within a Special Studies Zone pursuant to the requirements of the Alqu ist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act. SECTION 3, A Negative Declaration is hereby adopted for this General Plan Amendment based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1985. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Bever y A. Authe et, ity er • I '. ~ J - CITY OF RAtiCHO CtiCA~IOVGA cv ca.alo~ STAFF REPORT z~ _.^ =~-_x GATE: February 20, 1985 -' rs- T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROt1: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Lisa 'dininger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REPROGRAMM iNG OF BLOCK GRANT CONTINGENCY FUNDS TO THE HARED HOUSING FOR SENIORS PROGP.AM BACKGRO UtlO: At the February 6, 1985 meeting, Council considered a proposal by Inland hlediat ion Board to participate in a Shared Housing for Seniors Program, which provides housing matches between senior citizens in need of housing and those who wish to share their homes. IMB requested an allocation of 45,000 of CDRG funds to finance Rancho Cuc amon ga's share of the regional program. At that meeting, Council expressed a desire to consider approval of the program and set the p u6lic hearing for reprogramming of 45,000 from the 1984/85 Block Grant • contingency fund to the Shared Housing for Seniors Program. A public hearing is required under CDRG regulations whenever funds are reprogrammed from one project to another. The Shared Housing for Seniors program would pray ide a free service to senior citizens, matching seniors in need of housing with others who wish to share their home and housing costs. This service is extremely helpful to senior homeowners who wish to remain in their homes but need assistance with housing costs and in many cases provides companionship far both Parties. The Program also provides displaced senior citizens an affordable alternative to living alone. Similar programs exist in Riverside, Santa Ana and Garden Grove. Housing matches occur through a computerized system with preliminary interviews and counseling conducted by Inland Mediation Board staff. RECOMMENDATION: After considering any public input, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the reprogramming of contingency funds to the Shared Housing for Seniors program and dir?tt staff to transmit the amended budget and narrative to HUD _ fp c iii suhmitt ed, Rick omez ,~ ~-~ •~, ~...,,,r city lanne~r ERG: L' .' ~ ~~0~ RESOLUTION N0. p_-2-2~-n1R '~ - • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPROGRAMMING FUNDS FROM THE 1984/85 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, following a public hearing the City Council has authorized the Community Development Block Grant funding for Fiscal Year 1984/85 in the amount of 5467,000; and, WHEREAS, a contingency fund of 514,950 was established for unanticipated costs; and, WHEREAS, a request of 55,000 of contingency funds has been requested for a Shared Housing for Seniors Program; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved participation by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the Shared Housing for Seniors Program. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby reprogram contingency funds in the amount of 55,000 to the Shared Housing for Seniors Program. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of FEBRUARY, 1985. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mike s, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Au thelet, City Clerk i~ nrmv nr.. n n wrrvn ~r ~r~ n nxn~rr n • STAFF REPORT ~'~y ~`'9. ~~ ~ s ~~= i ~ Y~ 'x _ ~ ^z ____ > 19'9 ~ February 20, 1984 T0: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official ~/` ' .'~ SUBJECT: REQiIEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACT WITH YL SYSTEMS INC. FOR MAPPING PROJECT Since incorporation there has been incalculable time loss and AeTay in response due to the inadequacy or non-existence of suitable base maps for utilization in the every daY ooerat ions of the city functions. • As the city council is aware funding has been cumulativ ety provided in the last two budget years to allow for contractual preparation of base maps for the city. The mast economical way of developing these maps is through a process of computerized digitization of a data hale and product inn of maps from that base. As a side benefit to production of the mans, the data base if properly prepared can serve as the nuc'eus of a local parcel base data storage system that will Aovetail with San Bernardino County's hase and is the inir,ial step tnwarA a complete oarcei- based data management system for planning studies, report generation, plan check and permit tracking, etc. Once th55 project is initiated, the Planning Division can proceed with development of the balance pf the overall system. During the past 18 months we have explored a variety of cooperative avenues for mutual partic ioation in the project. in the formative stages the Cucamonga County Water District indicated an interest in participation, but eventually decided to withdraw. We explored having San Bernardino County perform the work, but they indicated that they do not have staff time available to input the data and produce the maps, and additionally do not believe that they should compete with private enterprize. However they have a keen interest in exchanging different data once it is developed. ~~ REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR MAPPING PROJECT • February 20, 1985 Page 2 We also made contact with the Foothill Fire Aistr ict who originally indicated they had no interest, but has since expressed some yet-to-be-explored possibilities. After a first abortive attempt to obtain comparah le proposals from potential contractors, and revision of our request, a second Request for Proposal was distributed to seven firms that had previously indicated an interest in the mapping project. We have received -~sponses from all proponents and have analyzed their prOpO5a15 reiatiVe to each Company's Prior experiences 1n similar projects, qualifications of st off inq, equipment to he utilized, their ability to perform the work in a competent anA satisfactory manner, and of course anticipated costs. Of highest priority was the attainment of a high degr ee of compata6ility with the San Bernardino County data management system to facilitate future interchange of data. We have also explored the abilities of the proponents to provide Aata updates anA production of special maps upon request, although these items maV • be available from the county once the data base is complete. After thorough study by a staff committee, including visits to proponents facilities, interviews with several of the most promising candidates, and solicitation of expertise from county sources, it is the unanimous opinion of the committee that VL Systems Inc., an Irvine based firm, best fits all of the parameters established in the request far proposal, Thev are currently performing similar work for the cities of Irvine and Poway and additionally offer the County of Orange and the Irvine Company as references. Contacts with the two cities indfcate highly Satisfactory results. San Bernardino founty Aata management section is also Completely satisfied that their system is compatible with and interfaces readily with the coon t,y system allowing dual exchange of information. it is recommended that the staff be authorized to negotiate a contract with VL Systems, Inc. for preparation of a data base and production of base maps for the city. JRG:11 • r~W9 CCCAMp ~`~' ~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~~ 0 ~' A ' • ~ 6 IZ fownlivn.len _ ~~> Chvles J. Bu9uet II leHrer Ring 19;> Richard 11. Dahl Pamela J. \fright December 20, 1984 VL Systems Inc. 2691 Richter Ste. 118 Irvine, CA 92114 Attn: Dave Byers SUBJECT: SUBMITTAL OF PROPOSALS FOR MAPPING SERVICES Gentlemen: • In June of this year, the City of Rancho Cucamonga solicited proposals for developing a computerized digital data base for mapping purposes and provid inq maoo inq services. Analysis of the resDOnses received indicated that the request for proposal lacked adequate information to achieve comparable responses and additionally contained errors. To attempt to clarify the issues we have prepared a revised request for proposal. Your firm is one of those submitting an original proposal or has since expressed an interest in doing so, hence the direction of this letter, We request that this information be returned on or before January 15, preparatory to recommendation for contract authorization to the city council early next year. I will once again serve as project manager so please direct questions or responses to my attention. Thank you for your cpntinued cooperation Sincerely, Jerry' ra~~~~ Buil inq Official 1~ JG:11 I fr J 9070 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE C POST OFPICE BOX SOT RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91700 • (7109941951 REpUEST FOR PROPOSAL: • PROJECT: The Project consists of three segments: 1) Development of a sample atlas sheet as a Pilot Program, to be developed using data provided by the enclosed city map, (Exhibit C) and other currently existing records. 2) Development of a computerized data base for future production of maps of the geographical area of the City of Rancho C ucamonga and adj oininq areas as outlined on the accompa r.ying Exhibit A. 3) Preparation and production of map atlas pages encompassing all lands within the incor orated boundaries of the city from the data base. Exhibit B Pilot Program A. As the initial step in completion of the project, the contractor is to complete a Pilot Program. The Pilot Program is to encompass digitization of the area shown on Exhibit C and preparation of a sample atlas page from currently existing maps and records. The sample page will he subject Co city approval as to the format and arrangement prior to proceeding with the balance of the • project. B. The contractor is to provide a cost for completion of the Pilot Program. C. The contractor is to specify the time required for completion of the Pilot Program. D. Acceptance of the Proposal far development of the Pilot Program will not constitute acceptance of the proposai for the balance of the project. II. Development of the Data Base A. The data base, is to be prepared in format compatible with the format used by the County of San Bernardino so that the data base may interface with that of the County's geo-based information and mapping system (GIMS). B. The contractor, in the proposal, is to describe techniques proposed to be used for converting the data base to California State Plane Coordinates. C. The contractor, in the proposal is to provide a listing of sources of information to be utilized in development • of the data base and specify any additional costs that will accrue as a result of obtaining such information. (1) 7~ • D. The data base is to be capable, through the utilization of appropriate equipment, of production of maps of any scale, showing any individual or combination of the data layers described in Nos. 1 through 19 listed below: 1. City Boundary lines 2. Street Centerlines 3. Street rights-of-way, including designated future rights of way 4. Street width dimensions from established centerlines to adjacent property lines 5. Street names 6. Parcel lines 7. Parcel dimensions 8. Parcel addresses 9. Tract and Parcel Map indent ification numbers boundaries and recording data 10. Lot ar Parcel numbers 11. Assessor parcel numbers (book, page, parcel) 12. Equestrian easements of record 13. Drainage easements and Flood Control District rights-of way 14. Identification of FEMA flood zones A and AO (Approximateey 10 percent total parcels) 15. Zoning designations 16. Lot area (to the next higher .O1 of an acre • 17. 18. General Plan designations Planning Review File Nos. (approximately 1000 throughout city) 19. Fire hydrant locations (approx. 2,400) E. The con tractor is to base the proposal costs for digitiz ing upon the following assumptions: a. The area to be digitized is approz imatl ey 50.5 square mile s. b. Ther e are an estimated 25,000 parcels within the proj ect area. The con tractor is to include in the proposal the unit of measure ment used to develope the cost of digitization and is to specify how an adjustment in cost is to be derived in the event that the area to be digitized or the num ber Of parcels varies from the preceding assumpt ions. F. Alterna tive costs are to be provided as follows: 1. The cast of digitizing data layers 1-14 inclusive cf Part fI Section "D". 2. The costs of digitizing data layers 1-19 inclusive of part li Section "D". (2) ~~~ G. The Contractor is to include in the proposal, the time • required to complete digitization of the alternatives outlined in D1 and D2 above. I[I. Preparation of Map Atlas A. As a part of the project the contractor is to produce a set of maps of the area within the city boundaries (approximately 35 sq. miles). The maps are to be drawn on reproducible mylar, three mil thickness, (or alternately on vellum, 20 lb. weight, incorporating data layers 1-14 inclusive outlined in Part II of Section "C". Maps are to be prepared 17" x 22" in size with sufficient overlap to enable a user to determine perimeter street widths and intersection locations and identify adjacent properties beyond the basic area of each map. Maps are to be prepared at a scale of 1 = 100' incorporating approximately 1/16 of a land Section on each map plus overlap, with alignment markings for adjacent mappping segments. Maps are to be uniform in size and produced in the atlas format approved by the city as part of the Pilot Program described in Part I. B. The contractor is to provide alternative total costs for production of the maps on vellum or on mylar as outlined • above, based upon the assumption that there will he 560 maps. C. The contractor is Lo include in the proposal unit costs of myl ar and vellum maps for adjustment of the total cost of map production in the event that the number of maps exceeds or is less than 560 in number. IV. Updating and Service A. The Contractor is to include in his proposal the costs of updating the data base by the addition of data for the following hypothetical developments: 1. A 50 lot subdivision, alternative costs for data layers 1-14 and 1-19 listed in Part II, Section D. 2. A 3-parcel Parcel Map, alternative costs for data layers 1-14 and 1-19 listed in Part I1, Section D 3. A dedication of street right-of-way adjoining an existing parcel. 0. The contractor is to include current costs for production of the maps outlined be ow, assuming a data • base has already been completed. 1. A mylar map of the area within the city boundaries (3) 173 • (approzimately 35 sq. miles) including data layers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 15 of Part II section "D" at scale 1" = 1000'; final map to be approximately 56" x 42" in size. 2. A mylar map of the city at scale 1" 1000' showing data layers 1, 3, 5, and 19 of Part II Section "D". 3. An ink plotting on paper of one-quarter section of land at scale 1" 200' showing layers 2, 4, 5, and 16 of Part II. Section D. C. The contractor is to include in his proposal the time lapse required for preparation and delivery of special maps produced from the data base, as may be requested from time to time by the city. V. Qualification and Selection A. The contractor is to provide a statement indicating the firms prior experience in preparation of systems of similar nature, their current status and reference contact person, a resume of qualifications of persons who will perform various stages of the work, equipment to be utilized in digitizing and map production, and is • also encouraged to submit other supportive data or graphics. B. Selection of a contractor will be solely at the discretion of the city and will be based upon judgement of the contractors ability to perform the work in a competent and satisfactory manner, the methods to be used in development of the project, service response capabilities the Cime required and the costs far completion of the project. C. Each prospective contractor is to complete the accompanying form and return it as a part of the proposal. (4) ~7 i ,; -~ ,- ~, 1 i jj r ~ ' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ r-° - _ ~ -' - 1 ~ 1 , ~ - 1 _ ,p~V. _ . ~ 1 ~ i s ! { _ I .. ' ~ ~ I, I I 1 Y I ~ I v i~ ~ " ...... r '. .. '. II 1 ..~ I 1 ' I ~ ~..~ ~L r I n r 1 1 _- ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ - : ~ ~ ,. - - ' a ~~~ . ~~~ I ~ i ~ n, n I 'O Z ~ ' ~ t . .. o 1 ~ z _ . ~ ,,- -- -- - -- ---- ~ ~ o 1 ~ D i 1: 1: -- -- - . - --:-~ . .... 1 1 . la ... _ - I 70 . 1 ~ - ' O _... rn , ~ , n ' 1 ~ ' I I F ~ i S _ I I• ~ ~ i ... ~ ~ .n...~_ . .~~'.... i _ ~1. l .. ~._. ........~... ... .. ~ • I ~ ~ .. \ :;~ ~; n - I I it ~~, ~ ~ - ; ~ _ ~~ ~ i .... . . .... ... ~ .. ~ _ , ~ • ; .- ~ ~ . - - 1 ; 1 -- - - - -- o _. ~ ., - =--- .: _ 4 1 . ....; .: -_ . _,. . ~- ~. , . _.. I I I . .' ~~ ~~lil 1 ....t ~ r 1 + i75 'PROPOSAL GCi IF~TER MAPPING CERVICEC CITY OF R,A~~!CHO CUCAMONGA ~~~ VLSystems. Inc. VLSystems, Inc 259' Hmnter Sane t•a ~, ne CA o2 )~J~=t2a "~~iecrianerA 6G'~55ii January 15, 1985 Mr. Jerry R. Grant Building Official City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Boz 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 COMPUTER MAPPING SERVICES Dear Hr. Grant: In response to your December 20, 1984, RFP, VLSystems, Inc. (V LS) is pleased to submit this proposal to prepare a city base map and digital data base Cor the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Although much of this present proposal Is contained in our Orevious proposal submitted under the aegis of Yan Dell and Associates on June 28, 1984, there are signi"Scant differences in content. This suhmittal has been prepared to be complete unto itself and supercedes our previous proposal. We have reviewed the City's new Request for Proposal. Our response is organized as follows: OBJECTIVES SCOPE OF SERVICES PROFESSIONAL FEE/SCFIEDGLE PROFESSIONAL QDALIFICATIONS APPENDICES Within Proposal: Zoning Map CS ty of Poway Final Plat Example Submiet ed Separately: Irvine Highway Improvements Water Mains (vellum and laminate) Poway Redevelopment District Bound Layered Demonstration We consider the Appendices (submitted within the proposal and separately) to be crucial to demonstrating VLSystems' product and our client's utilization oC our services. We encourage the City to examine them carefully. We woultl like to inform you of Lhe move that we recently made from Van Dell R Associates to VLSystems, Inc. VLSystems is the originator of the software used in our mapping efforts as cell as that used 6y Van Dell for civil engineering, A restructuring of VLSystems has made it propitious for us to transfer our efforts, personnel, and accounts in order to remain close to the programming effort. This serves to make data conversion efforts easier and less costly and results in improved service to clients. VLSystems, Inc, is a multidSscip11ne0 computer mapping/CADD Cirs consisting of a staff committed to creative and cost-effective consulting service. Our firm is most eager to provide this mapping and data base service. Our team member, • ~7 7 ~_ Rattray and Associates, sill also be extremely beneficial to the survey - control and aerial Dhotography work program. With prior experience with the City oC Poway in San Diego County and Irvine in Orange County, we Teel confident regartl ing our qualificatl ons to perform the desired automated mapping tasks for Rancho Cucamonga. To a large extent, we will be calling upon planners, engineers and cartographers to assist in the data Boll ection and input. Much of the work can be adequately addressed by these professional disciplines while the technical drafting will be performed Dy our in-house computer mapping system. MANGO, the soTtware package, runs on Digital Equipment Corporation's (DEC) PDP it and VA% series mini computers. Cale omp high speed plotters and Tektronix color graphics terminals will be used for data input/output. This system has been specifically designed to create planning and engineering drawings under an intense production environment and therefore is well suited for this mapping and data Dase management function. A primary concern of the team Ss to provide the mapping data in a format both usable and compatible with the County's mapping system. Our ob)ecti ve Ss to provide the City of flancho Cucamonga with Doth short-term and long-term solutions to their automation interests. The most Smmedi ate goal would De to establish a valid and accurate mapping base that will be compatible with the departmental needs of the City. At the same time, the basis needs of a parcel data base system are available to the City as a pilot study, with a minimal investment, for those anticipated future needs of the City. On behalf of our office, we would like to again thank you, Barbara grail and Lisa Wininger for your helpful discussion of the City's oD3ectives in this project. We are confident that YLSystems, Inc. cen provide the highest quality and most cost-effective product, as well as Lhe most responsive service available to the City, We hope our proposal reflects our interest and enthusiasu in t61s challenging assignment. He are hopeful that our revised proposal will De acceptable and are reedy to begin implementation of our system immediately. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, e VLSystems, Inc. - Je Cfre~~J, rostor, AICP Dave ye Y Di rec o Municipal Applications Planner a ing Analyst JJP/~h 17/56 _._ ~~~`4 1 ~,~ OBJECTIVES • C y^~ OBJECTIVES ^ The immediate objactive of Lhis project is to supply the City with a set of base maps, and in this process, to also establish a digital land-base which is transferrable to San Bernardino County Computer Rapping and Storage System. 1 In both endeavors St is essential to remain sensitive to the techniques of the County Tax Assessor's and Recorder's offices. The method for creating parcels for assessment purposes often varies from the set of criteria for establishing tat/parcel subdivision lines. It is also our goal to establish a close working relationship with Lhe City in order to insure that present operations or desired future applications of the City's information base are compatible with !ts own internal policies and procedures. The development of automated base maps will enable the City to drastically cut the duplication of mapping efforts among departments as well as providing e reliable, easily upd stable information base. To be most effective, this will be done in such a way as to be adaptable to current in-house manual drafting techniques. That is to say, such aspects as line style, letter quality, etc. will be easily recognizable and understood. VANGO, the mapping system, handles data quite differently than other "in teractl ve^ automated mapping systems. Rather than storing Smages, V1NG0 stores points with associated ^Sntelllgence^ separately from the instructions as to how these points are related. fits is important for a number of reasons; there results a significantly more compact data base, far less disk storage is required and the data can remain permanently on-line, hence reduced system costs. In-house system costs are much less, important for a city which may eventually wish to have this option. Workstation costs are lower (35,000. to 315,000, as compared to 360,000. to Ego, 000. )~ than other typical mapping systems. Much of our input for the base information is via coordinate geometry. ~ For a typical 6 workstatl on system ~~J Rather than simply "digitized", tract map boundaries are entered and stored as real ground coordinates. The result is a much more dependable and accurate ~~ base map. The benefits from this are realized as other layers of information - begin to rely on and refer to the base information. •' Whether the mapping base is stored in VLS's system or transferred to the county, the City departments will be able to store, manage and manipulate the vast amount oC information needed to help make useful maps and exhibits for a variety of planning and policy decisions. There are several immedl ate benefits whlch will be achieved by the City. Most obvious of these Ss that updates to the map Ease will be much quicker. Often, manual changes must be drawn by the City on 100, 200', 400' and 1000' scale maps. In contrast, with the proposed automateC mapping avai lability, changes will only have to be made once, since maps are produced with any given "window" and at any desired scale. Also, any combination of layers in the system can be combined to create a composite drawing (See Exhibit A). Secondly, the system can aid Sn compiling profiles of planning units, redevelopment projects or any special study area. Should the system become integrated with a parcel data Lase system, parcel level reports would be produceable Cor planners or engineers. Depending on the parcel data system desired by the City, reports can Identify areas where there has been av increase or decrease in property values, frequency of building permits, housing conditl ons, arson vlolatlons, etc. • 7hi rd, results of projects and exhibits frequently needed by Lhe planning and/or engineering department can be produced much faster. Recently one of VLS' clients required an exhibit for a redevelopment study. The request was for a map showing lot line information, rights-of-way, and parcels, 1000 feet on either side of a major arterial, for a distance of one mile. Both the parcel level inlormation and maD were produced within hours. This would have Laken several days since the City normally would have had to create a • composite by hand, from existing 200 or 100 scale assessor maps, as well as to collect a great Beal oC parcel information. `" Lot Lines ~~ r ~~ } Street Rights-of-Way Street Names Flood Hazard Areas Zoning Population/Housing Characteristics Composite Map of any Selected Layers ~ i~.~ EXHIBIT A 9y integr at Sng the long-term desire of a parcel data base/geographic • r information system, the City can be in a unique position to provide information reports. In addition, counter inquiries from developers, industries, or marketing firms evaluating sites in the city can rely on the system to locate properties which meet certain criteria. For example, suppose one wishes to know where parcels exist that are two acres in size, vacant, and in zone RR 1. This can be listed easily and/or plotted on a map with some distinguishing feature. Also, as the City subsequently adds sewer and water information, another dimension of infrastructure assessment can be added and presented as vital information. Physical condition and/or development Sn the City can also be traced and monitored. Such items as housing condition, combined with zoning and inspection records make the process of monitoring much less cumbersome. f The possible applications discussed are by no means exhaustive. The uses o the system d eterminetl by the City are limited only by the nature of the information needs and the quality and quantity of data. Nerein lies one • important variable oC the equation for a sucee s sful system. Close attention will be paid towards evaluating data prior to input, based upon the volume of data, degree of complexity and ultimate use in a data base. Every attempt will be made to prevent the City from falling victim Lo the "garbage Sn - garbage out^ syndrome. Nith these objectives in mind, the following section describes in detail the immediate tasks at hand to be accomplished by the team. r ~ i~~ 17/52 • SCOPE OF SERVICES ~• ., ~~ ~s~ r r r SCOPE OF SERVICES This scope of services can be divided into the Co ll owing five (b) tasks: 1. Data Collection and Research 2. Establishment of Survey/Mapping Control 3. Creation oC Data Rase a. Pilot Study 5. Development of Geographic Information System (OIS) - Optional 1.0 Data Collection and Research VLSystems, Inc. will collect the city maps and related documents which wi 11 become part ar layers of the data base. These documents would include, but not be limited to: (a) existing city atlas (f) assessor map (t) zoning (g) FIRM maps (FLOOD) (c) general plan (d) planning review approval designations (e) record map/parcel map and related subdivision documents The County Surveyor's office and the County Computer Mapping office will De contacted to obtain California State Plane coordinates which ezist Sn the city at various mayor arterial intersections, section corners or other locations useful in controlling the mapping process. Special "klckoC C^ and progress meetings will be held with the Ccunty to insure that their mapping control points are integrated into the City's base throughout the duration of the mapping program. 2.0 Establishment of Control All available control Doints that will benefit the establishment oC state • plane coordinates for the entire city will be utilized. It appears that some desired control points by the City do not readily a:iat in the city tiles. ,~~ _~ i One of the most economical methods available to accomplish this desired control is analytical aerotrian gulatlon to be performed by our team member, ' Ratt ray and Associates. This method combines aerial photography with a Cully computerized stereoplotter and a mathematical solution which reduces the amount of field surveying necessary and provides as many control points as required. A First order analytical stereoplotter with a simultaneous bundle adjustment can provide control points to whatever accuracy is required. This -- task assumes time and effort to collect Ch1s information and employ it in the mapping process. A combination of section corners and street centerline intersections will De used to establish consistency with the county system and future efforts of the City. Rather Lhan starting Crom one end of the City (or section) and creating the base from this paint, a logical distribution and frequency of control points will be used to adjust the progression of the mapping. A methodology employing acceptable surveying techniques will De used ' Lo establish a good fit of tract/parcel map boundaries before proceeding to - right-o C-way and lot line Snput. A meeting with City staff will be held to Dresent this approach before proceeding further with the mapping program. ' 3.C DS gitize and Create Data Base VLS will uti lSze a state-of-the-art computer mapping system, called VAN00, - to enter the data and produce the des fired drawings. Procedures tleveloped and ~ proven in numerous base map app lleations, as well as design and display - projects, will 6e utilized. VLS will input much of the Dase information with eo-ordinate geometry using bash of hearings from actual record documents. Accuracy of Lhe base map can then De assured. This system will De employed as an efficient means of creating va rioua overlays oC information (S.e., property lines, streets, zoning, easements, ete.) from documents provided by the city. These sheets will be checked against assessor maps to determine the number oC lots current Lo the date assumed by the City's RF P. IC should be noted that - there is no limitation on the number of layers malnta in ed by VANGO. - ~ By combining these documents with VLS' control map, supplemented with record map informatf on such as tract and parcel maDS, the adjustments needed Le produce an extremely accurate data Dase can be minimized. -~G As requested in the RFP, it is VLS' intent to map the following items • itlentlfied in the RFP: 1. City Boundary Lines 2. Street Centerlines 3. Street rights-of-way, including designated future rights-of-way 4, Street width dimensions from established centerlines to adjacent property lines 5. Street names 6. Parcel lines 7. Parcel dimensions 8. Parcel addresses 9. Tract and Parcel Map identification numbers boundaries and recortling data 10. Lot or Parcel numbers 11, Assessor parcel numbers (book, page, parcel) 12„ Equestrian easements of record • 13• Drainage easements and Flood Control District rights-of-way 1Y. Identification of FENA flood zones A and AO (Approximately 10 percent total parcels) 15. Zoning designations 16. Lot area (to the next higher .01 of an acre 17. General Plan designations 1g. Planning Aevi ew File Nos. (approximately 1000 throughout city) 19. Fire hydrant locations (approximately 2,400) During this process VLS will deliver 100' scale paper plots Lo the City, as well as 1000' scale progress-to-date plots so the City may periodically view the work being accomplished. The City would begin to receive maps on a weekly basis within one month of the beginning of Lhe work program. VLS will deliver, in addition to the above ezhlbits, a magnetic tape for transferring data to the San Bernardino County Mapping and Storage system, • 4.0 Pilot Program _ YLS is pleased to see the City aDProach this project with a pilot study. _ A mini-project oC this type will present the oppartun ity to solve many problems at a small, manageable scale. The pilot program will consist of digitizing the area shown on Exhibit C 1n the citys RFP, and preparation of a sample atlas page. This pilot study will allow the city to consider the various configurations of a Case map as - well as form and content of various mapping layers. Special attention will be .. paid to the technique and graphic style oC the final map. The City x311 _ _ experience first-hantl the issues involved in creating this Case information and participate dlr ectly in determining line weight, character style and y med ias, which will define the objectives between the consultant and City staff for future work. At this point, the City may desire to have a terminal in-house in order to v1eM mapping progress as well as begin to ezperlment with Geographic Information System options. (See 5.0 below) S.0 Development of Geographic Information System (Optional) YLS' experience has shown that there Ss a wealth of loca117 generated Information needed for policy decisions. Phis City-generated operational data is usually maintained manually and/or in separate unlinked computer files. There is also much data available from outside sources such as: o Assessor files o U.S. Census o commercial data bases o special windshield surveys or other studies o satellite remote sensing devices YLS will take the County As sesor'a parcel and address date Cile end set up a system that permits Lhe City to access this information. Since ell City r I~8 I needs cannot De perceived at the time of system initialization, a pilot study . containing certain principals of data structure and organization will be esta611sh ed. This geographic information system (G IS) will be convenient for City staff to experiment with and add additional parcel attribute character Sstics. With minimal investment, the City will discover its own hest ' organizational format to continue development of an integrated information ' system. VLS will demonstrate how to link Lhe mapping (i.e. geographic) and parcel - (i .e., attribute) data system. Items such as assessor parcel numbers and site _ attributes along ui th information the City believes important such as zoning, building permit information, ownership data, etc., will De tested with Che land base information in this pilot study. This link is accomplished through the use of an apparent centroid point on each parcel. The centroid will enable the CLty to relate the geographic data Dase with any attribute data it may desire. Certain information will De best represented as geographic information in a layer of the base information. • - Such items as, but not limited to, rights-of-way and parcel lines. other information will De represented bath as geographic information and attribute _ data (plottable through the centroid point). These items include zoning, _ general plan designations and other zonal areas. Some information is Desi represented and stored as attriDUted data. This is data specific to a certain parcel which is stored in GIS and also plottable through the centroid paint. Included in this data are lot acreage, parcel address and assessor parcels. As shown in the following Exhibit B, the data file is associates with the - centroid point Sn the computer. This allows for report generation, dealing - with development tracking issues as well as functions outlined in the _ OBJECTIVES section. i • ~/ r r i i i i i i i r r i i DELIVERABLES 1, Bibliography outlining the source documents and exhibits used to support the mapping effort. 2, One set of 100' scale progress plots to De used by City for review and checking purposes. 3. One set of 100' scale vellum or mylar base maps incorporating approximately 1/16 section of land as specified in the RF P. 4. One set of 1000' scale paper plots depicting the base at completion oC the work program. 17/51 i ~~ CLIENT gEFEg ENCES • Client Tel=ohone Barry K. Nogan, Director of Planning (619) 745-6600 City of Poway Planning Department Pouay, Cal Sfornia o Pouay City Base Mapping o Pouay Data Base System o Housing Needs Study Edward (Tony) 5l unka, CSty Engineer (774) 660-3663 City of Irvine, Engineering Services Irvine, Calffornia 0 2rvine Base Mapping Dan Fricke, Planner IV (714) g34-5550 County of Orange Environmental Management Agency , o County of Orange Master Environmental Assessment • Larry Sample, Project Engineer (714) 720-2370 The Irvine Company Irvine, Californ la o Irvine Highway Impro~ementa • I~~ PROFESSIONAL FEE/ SCHEDULE • ~ ~a PROFESSIONAL, FEE/SCHEDULE • The professional fee proposed is structured in accordance with the requirements outlined in the City's revised RFP. The fee/schetlule is based upon the 25,000 parcels, SO.S mil estimate in the RFP, • r r r • ~ ~~3 FIRM ;l A.•fE c'L5~•s toms, Inc. A OOR ESS ^591 3ichter .4ve., Suits 118 CITY,STATE ir~i^e, California 9^i1+-~I~~ C 071TACi PERSOy Setfrev Presto r, lave 3rers RESPONSE TO RFP !TENS Item I.- 9. Pilot program casts S 1,9co.oo Item I-C. 1. Time for completion of Pilot Program 7 wks Remarks: Includes chec's (s) by Ci[v of work as it progresses Item II-C Additional cost far source information Remarks: Lxistinn maps not possessed .+ or provi..ed on lean by the vi C: mill be nb[a'_r.ea th rpu^, h local 'o lueprir.t c omwnv - 5>CO bud et establisher.. Item II-0 Unit of measurement costs(sq. miles, parce l etcderive digitizing Method of cast adjustment c- ~0 g ,<i ' 1 Remarks: units of cost vary zeatly dependin on rich - cons idetations as: specific area of ci[•: 'u rhan vs. rural); level of accuracy needed; source of informs! ion and type of info resat ion. Item II-E Item iI-E _ ~ Item II-E _ 1. Cost of digitizing data layers 1 14 Sez.szs.oo 2. Cost of digitizing data layers 1-19 S;,,rc.cc~ Remdra$: ;.nc lu des ohptperamae Cric control. Includes ces[ of pilot program in the event VLS is chosen co complete ro'ec[. ^oes not inc'_ude calculation and is ut of laver 16, lot pares. Lot area is adjusted ac a rate of S.iS/lat. 1. Time for digitizing data layers 1-14 5_6 mos ~ ~ I ~ µ Item II-'c 2. Time for digitizing data layers 1-19 6=9 mo• Remarks: :::e schedule assumes a Dace ar.c is ip ated desirable ro [he Ci b: and is ad'ustabie. item I1I-6 Cast for production of vellum maps $ 6.3:/sheet Cost for production of mylar maos S ".50/;beet Remdrk5: Tie cosCs based upon taw -aCeCials and 52C LO Ciae '2e4 ir2d fOr CaC^ :'an. Item I9-A 1. Costs for 50 lot Subdivision update: data layers 1-ld 5165.00 data layers 1-19 5'_5.00 Item I'J-A 2. Casts for 3-parcel Parcel Map update: data Layers 1-13 5 x5.00 data layers 1-19 5 60.00 ltem I`7-A 3. Cast for dedication of ROW update: 5.40/Sin. fc Remark S: ,4ssumes ac e,:race con[rc1 and record ~ • dcr_a.er.[s su^r.l ied. I tam IV-3 1. Cost of mylar city map showing data layers 1,2,3,5,6,15 and 17 5115.00 Item IY-3 2. Cost of mylar city map showing data layers 1,3,5 and 19 5 !15.00 Remarks: Item I'J-8 3. Cost of 1/4 Section ink on paper map showing data layers 2,A,6 and 16 $ 45.00 Remarks: Item I'J-C Time required for base map preparation and delivery of special maps / days Remarks: This Cime frame is also flex i6le depending vn ^atv re of desired mao. (Aare lv would exceed 1-2 days) . ~s5 Total Cost of Project: Digitization Data Layers 1-19 inch, pilot program, - atlas maps) S 66 ,976.o0j Time lapse far completion of total pro,;ect 6-9 mos x Aef ei to temara Iter., II-c; assuc.es pcoductior. o[ vellum craps. r ~~ r ^ ^ 1, EstaD li shment of Pilot SEUdv for Par el Data System ;motional) VLSys Lems~ Inc, ; 3000 2. Future Services (OOtl onal) VLSystems, Inc. a. Additional Mapping D. Encoding and Storage of Additf onal Items in Parcel Data System E2.50 to 3.50 per parcel ;. 25 to .TS per parcel Travel expenses to and from City Hall are included in this Dudget. A full staff meeting once every 2-3 weeks with the City will also De held in addition to numerous direct interfaces the City project manager and affected staff. Any special mapping request or mylar reproduction will be negotiated on an individual Dasis. A map requested Dy the City usually will be provided within one or two days following the request. • • /~ / scneouLe The consultant team proposes work to be complete in six (6) to nine (9) months from date of contract. Alterations to this schedule can De arranged if the city desires. YLS is prepared to begin work immediately. work ran be completed sooner; however, experience shows accessibility Dy the client to the work process results in a much more useful data Case organization. A shortened Lime frame usually results in lost oDPOrtunities due to Lhe proh 161tive cost of changing basic aspects of file organization. r r r ~ ,~~ PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS • • ly5 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS VLSystems, Inc., is a mul tidisciplined mapping/software vendor firm offering professional services in the fields of Public Planning, Civil and Mapping Computer Systems. Our staff represents a balanced cross-section of planners, engineers, cartographers and programmers. Many of our staff have a wealth of public sector experience having served as staff and administrators for local agencies throughout Southern California. Our technical capabilities are enhanced by registered professionals and an in-house CADD system recognized as one of the most advanced for ground based Informatl on in the industry. To a large extent, we will call upon Lhe expertise of our engineers and planners to conduct the research necessary to gather documents relevant to preparation of Lhe city's Dase map. Review of documents related to property line, and right-o t-way locations such as CracL maps, street improvement drawings, etc., will De performed by qualified engineers, surveyors and planners experienced in preparing these plans for the development community. Our planners and technicians will assist in the data base gathering by researching relevant planning documents and insuring that the final product Ss compatible in style and quality with Sts intended use by the planning department. Cartographers on staff will help insure that visual integrity and graphic communication in the base map Ss maintained. Accuracy of the final Dase map and photo interpretation will De closely scrutinized by our land surveyors and Rattray and Associates whose background demand this special attention. - For overall project coordination and primary interface with City staff, Jeffrey J. Prostor, AICP will serve as project manager. Nis most recent applications of our in-house computer technology for conducting Dase map activities and parcel data systems in Pouay and Irvine will be directly applicable to Rancho Cucamonga's Dase map and data Dase activities. The following team chart identifies the primary individuals to be involved in the base map and parcel data system activities followed Dy the respective resumes, w ~d ~ r r Dave Byers and Ed Wong will tlir ectly be responsible for research and input of • the city's base map. Ed Nong's experience with Sr vine and Poway as well as Irvine Nighway Iaprovements for the Irvine Company will greatly enhance the cartographic integrity of the final product. Dave Byers' experience with Irvine and Poway, along with Master Environmental Assessment for the County of Orange, will add user's sensitivity to the project. Harvey Liss will oversee the development of the optional geographic information system for Rancho Cucamonga. Dr. Liss's years of innovation with land-Cased computer systems will be invaluable in development of a system which atltlresses the needs of the many departments in the City dependent on geographic information. YLSys terns, Znc. will also be relying upon the services of Rattray and Associates. Rattray's experience in aerial mapping and inter-olati on will be extremely beneficial to the accuracy oC the base map. Aattray and Associates are located in Escondido and Santa Ana. fie firm has completed many projects • oC a geodetic control nature Sn San Bernardino county. Using the analytical aerotriangulation method, they are about to begin contract work establishing control at Ontario International Airport. In the exhibits presented Sn the appendices, various applications useful to clients ere presented. These demonstrate how zoning, water and saver line, floodline and floodway as well es other layers may be prese~ed. 1 _I.. • s _' ~__ .~ vi i t PROJECT TEAM VLSystems, Inc. City of I Rancho Cucamonga. J. PROSTOR, AICP Project Management ~rrrrrre~rr^ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ RATTRAP and Assoc. T. RATTRAP/G. DILDINE Photoprammetry, Geodetic Control D. BYERS E. WONG Research, Enco HARVEY H. LISS P.E„ PhD. Geographic 1n10rmatlOn System ~D o2 VLSYSTEMS Computer-Aided MapDln9 System { i 1 L 1 i JEFFREY J. PROSTOR, AICP ERPEAI ENCE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL APPLICATION 'lLSystems, Zne. Irvine, CA Responsible for pro)ect management and computer operations related to both private and public mapping and data Dase projects. Experience inclutles creating mapping bases, stereo plotter interfacing, municipal needs studies, network analysis and parcel data Dase systems. SENIOR PLANNEA San Dell and Associates Irvine, CA Responsible for pro)ect management in a variety of public and private mapping, planning and design pro )ects. Conducted general computer applications in planning, engineering and environmental disciplines. PLANNER I2I ~ • City of Irvine Irvine, CA administered all current development planning review fcr the tlepartment. Duties included policy development and review oC various zoning, subdivision and site design projects. Other responsiD pities included chairman of subdivision committee and leader for several task force committees. EDUCATION University of California Irvine, CA Post Graduate Studies (Social Ecology), 1975-1978 University oC Ca lifornla Irvine, CA Bachelor of Arts (Social Ecology), 1975 PROFESSIONAL CEflTIFICATION American Inst MUte of Certifted Planners - Charter Member PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association, Member • Urban Land Institute, Member Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (UAISA) Southern California Computer Aided Mapping Association (SCCAMA) ~~- 3 EDWIN W. WONG YPCVrcnrF CA P.TCGP,APHfR :'LSys terns, Inc. Cr vine, CA Administer computer-as9lsted mapping applications for both Drivate and public ,apping and data Dase projects. Responsible for project organization, client :i ason and ensuring the cartographic integrity of maps. ASSiSTAN7 CARTOGRAPHER '!an Dell and Associates, Inc. Irvine, CA Responsible for computer-assisted mapping applications consisting of Lhe creation oC city base maps and the mapping of related infrastructure .'aci li ties and various thematic data. STUDENT CONTRIBUTOR L'. S. -Mexico Borderlands Atlas Geographical analysis, using maps and satellite imagery, oC an area 100 miles by 20D miles in extent overlapping a portion of the U.S. -Mexico borderlands. EDUCATION CALIFORNrA STATE UNIVERSITY Long Beach, California Post-Baccalaureate Studies, 19R3 UNI VEASITY OF CALIFOflNIA Los Angeles, California Bachelor of Arts (Geography), 1982 PROFESSIONAL AFFILITATIONS American Congress in Surveying and Mapping (AGSM), Member American Cartographic Association (ACA), Member Southern California Computer-Aided Mapping Association (SCCAMA) California Map Society, Member 17/64 YQ / DAVE L. B2EflS E%PERIENCE PLANNER/MAPP18G ANALYST 'lLSystems, Inc. 2 rvine, CA Respons ib it ities include system configuration for municipal data base systems, i.^.put for and produe tion of special studies and maps includ ing redevelopment districts, infrastructure assessment, etc. Computer applications to enviro rmental assessment. DATA BASE/PLANNING ASSISTANT Van Dell and Associates, Inc. Irvine, CA Respons Sb it iti es include parcel data for municipal data Dase systems, utilization of cartographic principals Sn computer-assisted base mapping, interpretation and encoding oC en vl ronmental constraints Cor Master Environmental Assessment, County oC Orange and assisting current and environmental planning tasks. PLANNING INTERN City of Laguna Beach Laguna Beach, CA Res panslble for reorganization of commerc Sal building plans, and reviewing internal organlzat ion of the Community Development Department. ECUCATZON UNI'lERSZTY OF CALIFDBNIA Irvine, CA Bachelor of Arts (Social Ecology -Planning), 1983 SAN JDAOUIN DELTA COLLEGE Stockton, CA Associate in Arts (social Sciences), 1975 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Amer lc an Planning Assoc la tlon, Member Urban and Regional In To rmation Sya terra Association (Ufl ISA) Southern California Computer Aided Mapping Association (SCCAMA)~ • • n, v C. HARVEY H. LISS, P.E. 'VFFRT FwrF . RES IOENT/TECHNICAL DIRECTOR 7LSys terns, Inc. 'mine, CA Respons iD le for research and development as well as supervising all computer activity. Nis main activity has been the development oT an interactive, computer-based design, drafting, and geographic data Dase and information system. PROJECT ENGINEER/DIfl ECTOR OF RESEARCH '!an Dell 6 Associates, Inc. Irvine, CA Responsible Cor pro,{ect management Cor a variety of engSneering, urban design and hyd rogeological projects. ASSISTANT PROFESSOR Stevens Institute of Technology Hobak en, New Jersey Instructed civil engineering and applied mechanics while developing a computer code and associated graphic output Tor numerical analysis. EDUCATION POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF NEN YORK New York, New York Doctor of Philosopy, Appll ed Mechanics, 1969 POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF NEN YORK New Ya rk, New York Master of Science, Applied Mechanics, 1964 THE COOPER UNION Bachelor oC Science, CS vil Engineering, 1962 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Professional Engineer (CE) Ca llfornia @25246 PROFE5SIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers, Nember Society of the Sigma Xi, Member ~~/~ ,;'1A5 F. RATTRRY PRESIDENT - ~-ce Junior College and University of California, Business ~nagzment and Engineering. E^',°ER - California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors, California Land Surveyors Association, American Congress of Surveying and Mapping, and The American Society of Phetogrammetry. Past President of California Land Surveyors Association, San Diego. '... S:S~ERED SURVEYOR - California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico. `_?',7 ERIENCE - Eleven years President of Rattray and Associates, Inc. We have provided services throughout the United States and in Saudi Arabia. Seven years Project Supervisor and twelve years Field for Pafford and Associates, Lot Angeles, California. Project Supervisor for the Los Angeles area and field surveying in California, Arizona and Nevada. Instructor of Surveying and Photogrammetry at Palomar College. Member of the Surveying Advisory Committee, Palomar College. Three years teaching surveying in the Los Angeles City School System. • ~G 7 _ •: BRYANT ESCONDIDO OFFICE MANAGER -,ar Junior College - AA Drafting Technology 3ER - California Land Surveyors Association . E?.: ENCE - 4 Years Drafting, plus fi years Drafting Supervision in the following types of Surveys: Boundary, Architectural, Topography, Photogra mmetric Mapping and Hytlrogra phis. -7C KER Decree in Geography (cartography), University of .rnia at Los Angeles, -.°Eq:E`7CE - 3 Years Photogrammetry y LS' nrmv no n n vnvn nrn w n,rrnrn w u DATE: February 20, 1985 STAFF REPORT we L......auyC ~~~. z ~/ '-,~ ~,r~ili - c- .. > 19%' T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil_ Senior Planner SUBJECT: ANNEXATION N0. 1 - ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 248 ALRES OUNO U Y H OHL N AVENUE AND THE EX NS ION 0 MILL IKEN BANYAN ANO ROCHESTER AVENUES CARYN At the December 19, 1984 meeting, the City Council entered into an Annexation Agreement for the 248 acre Caryn Company site located north of Highland and east of future extension of Milliken Avenue. The agreement stipulated the City's intention to annex the site pending resolution of several planning, administrative, and procedural matters. As of this date, these matters have been successfully resolved, as follows: • o Approval of the Caryn Planned Community Development Plan Tezt for the site -- City Council, January 16, 1985. o First reading of Oeve lopment Agreement far the site -- City Council, February 6, 1985. o Approval of Taz Revenue Exchange -- City Council, Fehru ary 6, 1985 County of Board of Supervisors, February 11, 1985 o Approval by Local Agency Formation Commission of proposed annexation, authorizing the City to annex without public hearings -- February 20, 1985. Consequently, the site is ready for annexation. The only actions remaining on the part of the City Council are to order the annexation of the site to the City of Rancho Cucamonga through approval of the attached Resolution, and second reading on the Development Agreement Ordinance placed elsewhere on tonight's agenda. The entire site is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's sphere of influence and is fully contiguous to the existing city boundaries on the south and west. Annexation of the site represents a logical extension of the current City limits as well as its services, The city, with assistance of its cooperating agencies, is authorized and capable of providing the full range of the necessary urban services for the site. Finally, the Droposed annexation area is uninhabited, and the annexation is supported by 100% property owner consent. ~~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Annexation No. 1 February 20, 1985 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS A detailed Environmental Analysis Report was prepared by the County of San Bernardino at the time of County review of the project associated with the ann ezation. The report focused on environmental topics identified during the review process, including geology, flood control and drainage, circulation, noise, air quality, community services, and public utilities. As a result of the review, the County issued a mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. The City Staff was involved in a review process and worked clasely with the County on development of appropriate modifications to mitigate potential environmental effects caused as a result of development in the project area. All these modifications have since been incorporated into the project's Planned Community Development Plan Text. This Planned Community Tezt was in turn adopted by the City; it became, in effect the legal mechanism for controlling future development on the site, and actual prezon ing for the property. Through this prezon ing, the City became a Lead Agency under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, and, based on previously conducted environmental work, issued a Negative Declaration in connection with such prezon in g. This Negative Declaration on the site's prezon ing is all that is required under CEQA in connection with the Annexation. RECOMMENDATION upon the above, Staff ution, apywing Annexation ct~~1y submitted, RG:OK:ns Attachments recommends approval of the attached No. 1. ~~ • • • RESOLUTION P-.2~2B=UZR c A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF BANYAN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH AND BETWEEN THE EXTENSIONS OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE ON THE EAST AND WEST (ANNEXATION N0. 1). WHEREAS, the territory legally described in attached Exhibit "A", which is by reference incorporated herein, is located within the established Sphere of Influence of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and is contiguous to current City Limits; and, WHEREAS, the annexation of said territory will represent a logical extension of the City's boundaries and urban services; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the annexation of the property to the City would 6e beneficial to the public purposes of the City; • and, WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Bernardino County has reviewed the proposed annexation and on February 20, 1985 approved Resolution No. f~~, approving the above-described annexation and authorizing the City Lo order the same. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order the annexation of the above-described territory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga subject to all terms and conditions of LAFC Resolution No._, and the following conditions: 1. Upon effective date of the annexation, the territory ~ shall be withdrawn from~45f~fr1~ and CSA 70. _ - _~~ ~~. ?~. 2. Regular County assessment roles are to be used for ''~ ~1 ~~"~ tax purposes. ~-~:/ ~ ,/ L " 3. Subject property will 6e taxed for existing bonded f .' `-~~ indebtedness or existing contractual obligations. E' C C _~ EXEIBIT A • A:iN EXATION CF TRACT 12642 (Uti °,E CORD ED) AP1D TRACT 12643 (UPiRECC RD ED) APID BANYAN STREET (PROPOSED,` TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi40PIGA A PCHTIO" OF SECTiO:i 30, TOWNSXIP 1 NCRTH, RAPdGE o WE S'T, SAN °?°IdARLI:JO MERIDI A?7, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERN AP.D INO, STATE OF CAL: FO RPIIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEG IPiNIi;G pT THE SO'J TiIWEST QUARTER OF SP.ID SECTION 30, SAiD BEG I?IN I?IG BEI:r'G AiJ ANGLE POINT IN THE EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE CIT:' CF RANCHO CUCAMOP7G.4, THENCE P70 RTH 00°19'39" WEST 2651.49 FEET ALO:iG THE WEST LIPIE OF SAID SECTION 30 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER CF SAID SOUTHWEST QU Afi TER, SAID WEST LINE BEING A BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID CITY; THENCE SOUTH 89°34'46" EAST 2707.29 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SATD SOUTXWEST QUARTER TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST OUA.RTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH 89°34'34" EAST 1327.73 F'EE^t ALGPIG THE PIORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE NOATXEA5T CORDER OF T.HE NORTH'r/EST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SCL''.H 00°02'02" 'dEST 2639.28 FEET AL OivG THE EAST LINE OF THE iORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER P.ND ITS PROLONGATION • ^.C SAID SOUTH LI?iE CF SAID SECTION, SAID SOU'.~"! LINE BEING A E.DARY L??i" OF THE CITY OF RAPICHO CUCAFiONGA; THF."ICE NORTH 9;°'6'09" 'dEST 1324 .1d FEET P.LONG SAID SOUTH LI.IE AND BGU2ID ARY LTi7E THE SO'; ^_3 ;:1ST 7;03iiER OF SAID SOUTH47E ST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH °.~°4~'2" 'elEST 2654.1G FEET ALGNG SATJ SOUTH .. _.,.. AND BOUivD ARY L.aE _ . THE POI::T C? BEGIPi:iI NG. TOLETHER WITI' THE SCUT_H 40.00 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SALD SECTI OiI APID THE SOUTH 40.00 FEET OF TH3 :dORTHEAST QIi:1RTER OF SAID SECTION. COMPRI ST_NG 249.07 ACRES SSG :47B PR3PARED Oft DEC. 12, 1984 N3337 I1 U / ~i C ~ ~ ~ ~~i Q , ~ ~o ' , ~ ~o ~T ~~ ~~ ! ~r ~~ :3 2~~ W~ ~ I • \ ~ d ~~'^ ^ ' + .YL 6F9l -- M.ZO, SOWS ~~ Ltl i~ L~l 'T m (/~ i a V' h iT IT ~W - W n T 3 h v W ~7 I y "~( .d -- 3h L~, hWp ~ ' / m 1 F ~ \ >, • m ~\01 N w ~y V w d ~ IT3 ~ ~ • it b W Q ~ ~ ~ 0 yy 3 ~ 2 ~ Z ~ W C,~ h Ltl m ~ ~ ti r ~ i n ~ ~ ~ w X W ~ ~ _" 2 4k N a a Z Q r ~ 0 ~ 4 W ~y ~ ~p ti~ p ^ ~ 2 y V ,~ 0 _~ I ~~ r ~ W o gh a x ,d $~ ~ xm I ~b l °~ YY $ ~// 30N1~Y N~yr pi lY ~ I ~e ~~ .LI /ffl M.LF. F/.[tlN $ tl9N(IWtlOW OHJNtlN i0 Ally I m 8 v ~. uslo fF ~ ~ G .:.' ~y~'~c RANCHO CUCAfv10NGA ~s,~j/,,~~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO~~~I~~'~?'''T~oN • sV'. ~ -~ _ Mwr yon D. Nikele SEP 29 1984 rya `z nr~lnembn r- -__ ^_~~_ _ > rharie.J.R~~4~e1a JeHre) Ems 718191~11ll1121112t3141516 J lu--= Richard 3I. Ilahl 1•amela J, R'riehi Sept. 15, 1984 CISIZEB'S IPPLICASTOtl TO SERPB oN Citizens' Advisory Committee NAME (I'.r. ) U11a E. suers ADDRESS 8357 Eella Vist q}, Alta Loma PHONE 907 3382 OCCUPATION Retired 70cia1 Studies Instructor EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) At, MA, plus 50 adds ioaal unit s. of graduate work in economics, least 2G correspondence courses as a Naval Officer, incl6ding ind :: -a9b9~cm~cut.nv.r,v T~o~..c. o..~Y, «•o..~..o .. u,..--o~ ... ...~. ..• ~.......... ....,.-o.- ...... Ctlet~ arry~wOttc~ay evenings you could not meet't If so, please list • ^Ic I have a_wgys been involved in Why are you interested in this position? nlanr.in~ n d..ic+on ma i.ng in all of m9 avocatioral and vocational endeavors. I believe all continue to make contrib~.:tions to the well being oS my community What do you consider to be your major qualifications? (1) Heeire t0 servd (2) Z am completely independent and beholden to no special in- terest except the citizenry at large(;) I have the eduBational government for 25 years I have what amounts to 4C ye are (lnciudi f and worker is every phase o£ my careers. REFERENCES: ~. Mike Dirksen, 8uperin~ent, Chaffey Joint Union nigh District. 2• L.urlran Wan :erman City Nnng~r 3• .rudan Tames Cramer- San 9ernardino Municipal Court. Former 4a Sob Rltizo, Ar-sistant City Man=ger Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council. (RC Form E) 98Y0 BASELINE, ROAM, BCITE f. • POST OFFICE BIIX 907 • RANCHO CCCANIISGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 • ~71q 989.1851 ' ~~ Y Addendum to Citizen's Application to 8~rve on Citizen's Advisory oZ ~3ttee. Applicant: lllla E. Bauere 1-I originally opposed incorporation of Rancho Cucamonga because I oould no great benefit to the area into which I had moved (Alta Loma) is 1975 in hopes that it would remain free of the political chicanery and ill advised deciaiona the.t brought about the dec~ine of the City of Pomona in which I had lived for 13 gears. However, the incoprparation is a fait = yc c~o_m~l_i_. Aside from the need bo maintain the low density character off'-AZta Loma, the need to improve its park £acilvties and possibil* the landscaping of arterials, the character o£ Alta Loma is £airly well set. And while there still needs to be special representation £or Alta L ma in the spirit of the ori6 final Advisory Committee a greater need is rEo bring the three areas o£ Rancho Cucamonga together. 2-I pr=~fer to bring to the Advisory Committee rational and logical decisions. rc%e .v 3-There is a erc~ clued ( that word ahctrld be empheaized)~that the power structtlrE O£ e ~ y consists of the de~elopere, the Chamber of Commerce and the commerical interests along 19th and 16th street. As a citizen beholden to bone of those interests I should be able to speak Tor the general public as a whole. 4-!qy capabilities may be indidated by my personal history. (a) In the military I enlisted as an apprentice seamen but on retirement from the Naval Reserve had attained the rank of full Commander. During my 30 years of active and neaerve service I held four commands, the last being Group Commander in charge o£ all Reserve activities from (ro ughly}gellog Hill to 3ancho Cucamonga, from t~ Chino Hills to Mt. Baldy. (b) As a newspaper man I was advanced to an editorship 6 months after taking my first dob and rras a managing editor (or in that general category) qr executive editor from then on, working oa daily paper in California, Cregon, Wash in~ton and Los Angeles. (c) As an edsc ator Z was Chairman of the District Teachers' Association, Chairman of. Cheffey nigh Task Force on Grading and Grouping, Ch air¢an o£ the Local Curriculum Steering Co:mittee, Chairman of the District Curriculum Steering Coi~mitteb, Chairman o£ the District Competencies Task Force, BuLcommittee Chairman of two Graduation Requirements Task Forces and a member of other committees, too numY~erous to mention, generally havin.~ to do with setting or advising on general educational policy. (d) I retired from teaching fir. 1973 aft~a 25 years' service. I have taught or substituted in all schools in Chaffey District, in Middle Schools and High School in Clarement and Pomona „in a school for mentally retarded, in a continuation school and for one year on the college level through the extension division of thelllniversity of Cregon. (e) I serviifor one year as executive editor for a new publishing company and for the last month as its general managfr. (By that • time, unfortunately, I saw that it was not going to snrvive and left.) It went bankrupt lase than a year later. 5-If selected I expect to attend all meetings regularly and in addition will be a regular attendant at the Council Meetings. ' :~/,ri CE~~9tlsC~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~~~U.NO~ CITY OF ftAlv'CHO CUCAM01~1Nok, T~WN . '~~ ~ ,r•r..Jon D. Nikele ~ C' ~~~~F r..,.,U.,.... 418191n1v1~(1121314t$(8 - ` "Z Chvln J. Bulvet li Jamm G Frmt - ~ Rieh~rd M. Dahl PMllip D. 3<hloexr 19"" 'hc qtly;sercf C`ornm,;5•r ,~ ,,,- e,P/,,/_ ' J r _ CITIZENS APPLICATION TO SEAVE ON 1' ~ y ~ ~ r) •41 ~ ~ ~ • r ; ., ~„; , r~ • ~ C ADD.;ESS G; 75~~ Y s~ ~JG " i%vC a l<: G- a+^a ~`.g yi ~c / ?HONE f//r(~cfa"/ //7/ OCCUPATION /1'r C%va /,1 ^ rrp /, 5~!-/Tram /`fa hi.. -1 t SG IYt/M] !%nvJnCr EDUCATION: (11st dhdi/ghes~~tJ) year completed and all degrees)) ~~NI~~ D. L'el.'C~''?C?}~} re "((IC''ry Ql f ~fsJi~ L /u (r'rJYoN'/ /~•rul~vnl~~' rX ~' %!('/r( lC~~•CY[~l,C T/~:lpS ll4rt~hlG .7 /<- (j /t,~/N TC xG100 r3 A K. /, l,i,, r Sc.r. rr v /Jilt •t/„ ~.. ~.7` ~N~/•vN [ i Are there any workCay evenings you could not acct? If so, please list '~ . 7 • 'nny are you interested in this position? 1- N•ll " 'l '~n'S*tA •h q haY~ eNgVC'r~~Se ,h 41'~'rt~ al'taS ~{k7f U,• (!JfrL'nnnL/K ~i~;.,~fht -~'•Parr~F7c L'/C,lKrn. [ 1 n•n VFr •1[M^pe'c( tltC. ~ +hC 'dhat do ••>ou consider to be your mayor qualifications'~~r'1 ec(•ca ~Rn•~ /-q .n, q„c~ , CNekt/r/,,.,1 l2 /~^ nrleree.r,r C'~!b 1lrr C'CM.~,/n,fy<u~ C'•w~ /a-~r{,,.-j "arn w Sfi, rrh ~/J..' 7l,s ~ i. ~< c. hn at /.rdre ,.~+AN . , ~_ u..,,.._, _.. ~._ _ ,_.,J ~,. ~,..Jf,...l.fsB~.,l.. G..' 1S ur 4 i n ~a l' c ~ lcc.. / {acs arx~ prh %tu iSS ltl l,~rtn./ ~ 1- a.a Nq rn/.r nm.••~ <if u.,c/ 4rr7aif2r'>!I~c„Pl4nur, /~-1F-+-FRi'r*rKr rN a/.u l.~ wr Fh n,. /*FrCiS~''•'Y, ci rnM'7/rrS c'Owtw!•SSr o~ S~[~ver - °AEENNCES: ~ . Brzn-i 5!/.~i/rN 1(E ~ ~<. s, ~. Fie Aµ. !.o•„•L Y~i - 2 »L 9Hn ~:'mri Ydo-'/zvy 3. 5'h"2 ~Th S,'~n L/Z 3 ~~„•nL.r.c.~oP ~!'l2i~u„•r, Y1~9-YS zE Please attach a written statement containing any addit LOnal information you feel would be useful to the City Council. RC-(I) Anse BARELINE ROAD, g!9TE C POST OFPICE BOE x07 RANCHO CCCA.NON/G_A, CALIFOR70A l17a0 (71Q 9A9d A51 • ~ ~/! C e'rr' i,~ ~43L 6~~f~G~ rNN6/JG--- Unc~ I}J ~n!'ru vS ~'h/cl,c, pn/ t%C~ ~g~G. //~~ l V= fvavt wzeke~ ay u ('~.~~g75S~uwa~ i~tfern is (i'nv~rtsnurty 'TNh Lt'wr5 a.,J u5 un /~r1t,n•s/rvl;vr l.~drr~ r<~ ,TynJ Garner ,.l ~hr ~iy{r,cf ~rna+~s ~u ,., 5.8. CCU.NO~ ~~r~,~~~., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN1dt3~`l~ycHO ~ -~ ~ x~i~1 ~l,' w.,..JunD.Mike~• FGN~Ir:IST~; W~gH ONGA _ cc I~z r•,wa...w.. SEP 27 1984 = ti ~~ Ch.dee J. Buquer II l.mee C Fmet Ap -_y_- R~rn,raR.D.m rnnrpD.s~hio..rgl$191101llI~i1i2i3i4i5s CITIZEN`S APPLICATION TO SEAVE ON ADVI80RT CWLMIASIOS NAME James 0. Campbell ADDRESS PHONE 980-1518 OCCUPATION q„~1 ne ~_~ Own nr EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) Nac ra.'~ nog.e _ Cnr:n_Fr nnnm:ra Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list • 'nry are you interested in this position? t haves ~P ~ho tahg.n,,.h rh;~ c onnunity. and I feel my experience in husiness rm,ld ha v c hclnfnl cnluino problems. What do you consider Lo be your ma,)or qualifications?y/~yG=os s.e,n ~ of mana¢ement experience: active oar[ic ioaCion in Service Oreanita[io ns inc lud ine Little LeaKUe, Soccer. and 8ov Scout or¢anizations: alone virh a dam; r., rn pact is ipa [e in community deV el opmenC. 'EFERENCEB: 1. _ Jahn Chandler - 90A5 cameitla cr. at ra tomes r, on nI 2• _d¢>;ry Cross - P. 0. Rns 11A6 d1r~ tnma fem. Olinl 3• Dave Kober es - 5847 Hillside Cove. Alta Loma. Ca 91701 ,~ Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council. RC-(I) ~~~ 9aR0 BABELINE ROAD, SUITEC PoBT OFFICE BO%907 RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CALIFORNIA 9l7s0 • p1O 999-1951 ~ G ~~~ ~ ~~~'„ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAA(~AlL c a,~r (~~~,,ca • v~ >SS ADMINIST r;, 'I kfv `' liz CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON $EP2819984 -.i ~~roL~~d55 ~> ADVISORY COM9ISSION ~ 19" 71819L~tll~21112~Si41818 NAME Grace M. Jones ADDRESS 10544 Wilson Ave., (P. O. Box 1h 1) A1[a Loma, CA 91701 PHONE 900-2460 OCCUPATION Business Owner EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) 4 yrs. college, B.A. in Education Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. Nhy are you interested in this Dosition? I wane eo become involved in my ca,mnunicv. I feel wl[h r.,v ex9erience I could serve [he community well. • Nhat do you consider to be your maJor qualifications? I am in celligene, updated on most issues and I have served the community Ln other cities chat I have 11ved. I am currently chairman of the finance tortoni t[ee at s[. Peter b Sc Paul Church. as well as ore=_id ene of the parish en nnrii. i v omhc. of the board of cne lfarinwood Parks b rec re scion in San Rafael, CA< also a member of [he coordinacin¢ council for [he Dixie School District 1~ can Rafaci• a board of director for the S. F. Archioces an Youth Organ izacion and many many hours of volunteer work in the cicv of Danville. CA REFERENCES: L. Rev, Charles O'Connor. 5084 Fallin¢ Tree Lane. A.L. 91701 2. Mrs. Grace Braze 1, 9613 Arrow Highway, suite E, R.C., 91770 3. Mrs. Anne Ca linskv, 5458 Va Linda. A.L.. 91701 r,- ~If GCC4.N0 ~~~~~. C ~ R CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO~,~ tlaxa onra =~ ~ \h .wy..lon D. Mikele ADMINISTRHTION • ~~p '~ ~ CawrJrw4n SEP 2 0 >~ C 4 ~ Chvlee J. Buquet II J~mee C Froet ~ ~ -- 19'~ p,99~~~~9q~~~q~Q~~ Richvd N. Duhl Phillip D. Schlneeer Q_p,1L33.~7.9.4_L 1 +1+9'ei'+MM~~ ?1'M'1°I~1•' • i CITZZEN•S APPLICATION TO SRRYE rxt~~ ADDRESS ~ ; ~ - - ~ "' oypgo '- _ '^ OCCUPATIDN -' EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) Are there any workday evenings you coultl not meet? If so, please list h'hy are you interested in this position? ~ ~ • 'rlhat do you consider to be your ma for qualifications? ~ ~-~ Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you • feel would 6e useful Lo the City Council. RC-(Z) ~~~~ 9370 BARELINE ROAD, SUITE C PORT OFFICE BOE 804 RANCHO CUCAMONf.A, CALIFORNIA 91730 • 01/1939.1931 ,~`"`A'" CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ~ ~~~ f ~ CIIY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA a '- P ~~ AOMINISTRgTION ' SEP 261~A ~ 6 ~~ > ~, 7~191n~l~lir'~sr1~8 CITIZEN'E AP2LICATION TO SERVE ON: Citizens Advisory Commission NAME James D. Boo khou[ ADDRESS 5961 La yC On ~( ~~ ~ ~ ~ A~fA ~jr//J PHONE 983-4600 OCCUPATION Bank Adminiscrac ion EDUCATION: (list highest year completed and all degrees) M[. San An mnio College 72 hours unde r¢raduace L'n iversicy of Sou[he rn CaliFo rnia Leadership 0eve lopmenc program ' San Diego St aCe College 60- hours under¢raduace L'n ive cs icy of Conner ticuc Exe cur ive Development program Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list. Vo • interested in this o Wh e osition? :-v lve t i h L i y ar y u p o men n e o ne [o ma'.<e Che commumicv a betCer place co live. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? Generalist ~; ioh spec i'. is knowledge of gove rnmenc and ies operation. Husiness background and exoe ci ence. RE?ERE)iC ES: 1, Supervisor Rcbe rc Townsend San 9ernard ino 2. Frederick St emrich, Former dss istanc Sheriff Los .ange les Co un[v 7, Berger 9ielsen. Manager Mon[c La it Chamber of Commerce. Please attach a written statement containin3 any addiCional infor- mation you feel would be useful to the City Council. tr ~~U POST OFFICE 80%007 ~ RANCIlO CI'CA.IIONGA, CALIFORNIA !1700 ~ (tulflf-1151 '~ .. r ' _t Suss D. pookh out Vtu Pr nldent Ilar kst! np/Ade1 nl stratlon Bolden Paclf lc Bank J1s Bookhout, rsd dent a} the Nut End for ovfr 2q Yprf. Involved in di ff sr ent phun of Finan cl al lndurtry Man aquut for II Yearf. Farun Pr utdent Mar,tcl alr CA caber of Couerc• Pr oident Man lcl alr Plaza Rerchan tf Auoclatlon ChU roan of the Chino PLnninq Cassi•d on Pn anti Board of Truetus, Nuau• of Nlrt ary and Art, Onl arla Pruident, Poaona Valley Mor kshap Pr nltlent, Monte Vifta County Ma Hr Dlftrict Facllitln CorponUan Prl vat• Industry Counc11,8an Bernardino CountyiRnber Huber In hernaH anal Aneclatl on o{ Fl nanclal Planners Parf onaL Married (U nda lssl 2 Childr sn, Resldent a{ Rancho Cuwanq• Current Ruponsibllltun Bolden Pacific Banks Marked nq Policy, Pr aduct Devel op sent, Tralnlnq, Ad vertf sing, gales Activity Public and Cduunlty Re Ltl on s. Branch Adslnistration. Education, Undergraduate cork ate Mount San Antonio Col Lqs San Dlepo Stab Colleq• Univsr arty Of 9outhfrn California Univer sl ty of Conn •ctlcutt BanfraL Eeperi coca in •any phases of Construction and Osvelop cant. Tr oval led Ezt mel vaiy in United Btatu and Eur op• October 10, 1984 C icy of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Sirs: Ny family and I reten[ly moved eo Rancho Cucamonga. We are enthusiast is about the city and its pocenciat; Eor this reason we would like to become involved where ue can be of value. I have. as the a[t ached information will show, some experience • in Local Government and Planning Processes. 1 hope chat you will consider me Eor any position where I might 6e of assistance. Sincerely, G~~..~ '~~ dames Bookhouc Vice President Narkecing(Adminiscration P.O. Box 630 ~ 845 Norm EuClkd AVenuel~ Ontera, C~~~ ~ (714) 963.4800 f ~ RESOLUTION N0. AA 84-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE AEDEVELOP[gNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF AANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPAOVING THE MASTEfl PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 84-06 FOA A REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED NORTH OF FOOTHILL HOULEVAAD, WEST OF INTERSTATE 15 IN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That the Master Plan and Conditional Use Permit 84-Ofi are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That this approval is conceptual approval of the Master Plan and CUP only and does not constitute approval of any specific designs. That specific site plan and architectural reviex is required for each phase of the project. 2. The northernmost Lake shall be the form-giving element and provide greater visibility of the lake and lake edge activities. In addition, a second smaller lake shall be provided at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Loop consistent with the VSetoria Lakes Community Plan. Buildings and activities around both lakes should be planned to promote visibility of the lake. 3• Trails around the lake and through the center shall be designed as an attractive focus of attention through landscaping and special treatment. 4. That mitigation measures provided within the Environmental Impact Report will be required upon each individual phase where applicble and when necessary to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. 5• A refined conceptual Master plan shall be submlted within 90 days that addresses the design guidelines in Conditions 1-3 listed above. 6. A unifying architectural theme shall be developed utilizing common design elements and materials. Natural materials, earthtone colors and design features reflective of the City's xinery heritage, suoh as covered trellises and vines shall be Sncorporated into the overall theme. SECTION 2: That a supplemental Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and certified for this pro~eet xhieh contains mitigation measures that reduce impacts to an insignificant level. PASSED, APPflOVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of November, 1984. AYES: Wright, Buquet, Mikela, Dahl, ging NOES: None ABSENT: None o D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly Authelet, CSty Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM February 20, 1985 TO: City Council ~ 1 i ., l/I FROM: Beverly Aut City CZe SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 246 .d~ c~MO~9 ~- ~ I!x F ~ ijD 19iT Because the publication requirements foz Ordinance No. 296 were not met, we are bringing Ordinance No. 246 back to City Council for readoption. Since the public hearing has already been held, it is the feeling of the City Attorney that bringing this back to Council Foz a new adoption date and to publish according to the requirements set out in the Government Code would be sufficient. We would not have to hold a whale new public hearing. Attach: Ordinance No. 246-A ORDINANCE N0. 2a6_p 111 ONDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAHONGp, CALIFORNIA, DEVELOPMENT DISTfl ICT CHANCE N0. da.OS TO PREZONE THE DIRTRICt DESIGNATION AS "CAPYN PLANYEC COMMUNITY" ANO ADOPt THE OEYELOPMENT ?LAN FOR APPRO%IMATELY 2bH ACRES LOCATED BETYIEEN T:D: E%tENS iGN OF BANYAN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND pYENVE ON SHE NOR?N RND EOV*N, AND HETNEEN THE E%TENSIDN OF POCHFSTEP 0.YENU°_ AND MILLIKEN AVENU'c CN ?HE EAST RND vESt 'vHEflEAS. the City >C Reecho Cucm>nga, Cal lC>rnla F.as n!tiated proceedinga far the Change of Organixatian (arv,exatl>n) far the aD>ve fexr!betl property pwaumk tp Settlers 56195 aC the Calif>rnla u>ve r:went c>de; and NHEREAS. the CSty of Rancho Cucmonga, 6aafornla, deairea to prenne the above-described uninc>rporated territory pursuant to gectl>n 65859 x the Cel if>rnla Government Cade. The City Cmuncll >C the CLty at flmch0 Cucmange, Califarria does ordain as t>1'_>vs: gEC?ION The Cicy Cawc11 hereby Cinda and determSnea the foi loving: p. That the Plaeming Gomniasioh of tbz CSty of Rancho G ucmpnda, follaring a public bearing cold Sn the time end manner prmcrl6ed by lar, recamme~ s the prez>ning of the eMVe descrl D<tl properties ~ "Caryn Plamed C>mmunlty^ as defined to tF.e attachesDevelopment Plan Text and Sts Condltl>m of Appnval which are py Shia reference made a pert ~areot, and the! tnia Cicy C>unc1: has held a Dublie hearind :n the 'Ime and manner prescribed by ldr and duly :card anG »nsidered aald remmmendatlon. B. Thst the suDCect praparty :a auttabla for the mee permitted in the pnpaa ed dlatrict to 'erma at acceea, size, and comp~ti btllty with axle tang Land use In the aurraunding area; and ... That thla Drezon:nq will provide `.>r t.`.a devaiapmant of a camprehenaively planned urban eammcntty wit bin the District Shoe fa superior t> development >therviae a:loveDle under alternate regu:at loos. D. That Shia Drez>ning will pnv':e for development vtthin the Diat rlet In a mercer tom iatent 'with the Genera: Plan and with re:ate0 deve:opment and growth management pollclea mf the City. E. :Tat this prezaning will provl5e for the cnnatructl>n, Smpnvement, >r extension aC trans DOrtaelon faei11t1es, public utllitiea and public aervlcas required by development with the Oiatrlct, F. That Shia prez>ning is consistent with the ob~eetlvea >[ the Devei>pment C>de >f the CSty >f Rancho Cucmonga. .. thla premning vmvld not have a:gnlf tcanE Smpeet >n the environment mr the aurraundin8 Dnpertlea end that a Negative Declaration to iamed. gECt20N L The ab>ve dsacribed real property is hereby prexoned to the mannner statetl, end the development diatrtet map Sa hereby emended accordingly. Further, the developaent o[ acid praparty shall Ds regular ad by the adopt ad Developmept Plan text and Ste Conditi>ne of ADDnvai end in pert Dy the Rancho Cuouonga DevQapMnt Code. Ordinance No. 2N6 Pege 2 SECTION 3: Chet the prezoning spoil hemme efflctive at the same time that the aMemtlam hcomea effective purauanC to Sect!in 65d55 0[ the CaliMrnla OovarmmenC Cade. SECIION V: The lfeyar shall sign Chia Ordinance and the Cuy C:erk shall cause the same to W puhl iahed v1Ch1n fifteen (151 days offer its passage aC lesat once !n The Oaiiy gemorC, a nova paper of genera: e!rcu:at!:n yuEl iahed !n the Clty n( Ontario, CailMrnla, and c!rcuiatle !.. tae ]!tY o. poncho Cucamonga, Cali°. ornla, PASSED, 0.PPflOVED, and ppOPtED ATEg: NOES: ABSENt: aqn O. ylke:a, Moror ATTESt: Bever:Y A Authe.et, Gity Cierk ' { ~.. \~ „ February 8, 1985 Beverly Authelec, City Clerk City of Aancho Cucamonga 9320 baseline Road Su iee C Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Dear Ns. AuCheleC, I wish [o appeal [he issuance of a tree removal permit in accordance with Section 7 of Ordinance No. 37. The permit covers [he area east of Archibald Avenue Co Hermosa Avenue and south of Wilson Avenue. I would also appreciate [he City Council's review of special arrangements made between [he City and Crismar Homes concerning a previous violation of Ordinance No. 37 in which 75-100 trees were illegally destroyed. This action is taken because I believe issuance of the permit and the special a rrangemen[s v.io lace both [he letter and sp it i[ of Ordinance No. 37. Please note [ha[ this appeal automatically suspends Che permit and prevents the Eur[her removal of trees until [he City Council takes further a C.C iOn. Sincerely, w-IQL~~ Phil Ye ovkian 5835 Burgundy Ave, Ph. 980-3066 Added Consent Calendar Ztem: Set Public Headiny fnr March 6, 1985 ~~n' OF RANCHO UCAMONGA ADMIN;STE;, TION µ FEe 81985 7i8i91~iUj8ili~8~g~gi8