The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984/10/03 - Agenda PacketE r1 �J IU 1971 CTY OF RANUiO CUCAMO A CITY COUNCIL AGENElk Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California October 3. 1984 - 7:30 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda most be in mritiog. The deadline for submitting theme items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. She City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL To ognn A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Wright Buquet ,, Mikels Dahl _, and Ring _. C. Approval of Minutes: June 14, 1984 September 5, 1984 2. Ag0o011CINIT8 /PRgSIM IONS A. Presentation of Rancho Cucamonga's Official Belt Buckle r F_ L_ r7, City Council Agenda -2- 3. CONSNNr CAi.ENDAR The following Comment Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- eontrowersial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. A. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 84 -10 -03 and Payroll ending 09/16/84 for the total amount of $382,805.18. B. Forward Claim (CL 84 -21) against the City by Vincent Brocatello, auto damage, September 17, 1984, at Malvern Street. C. Approval of Tract 12809, submitted by Lewis Development Company, located on the north side of Base Line Road between Milliken Avenue and Deer Creek Channel. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -252 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL HAP OF TRACT NO. 12809 D. Approval of Parcel Map 8550 and request for a vacation of 6 feet of Rochester, submitted by Richard Wagner, located on the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and 7tb Street. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -253 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8550 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8550) RESOLUTION NO. 84 -254 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF THE WESTERLY 6 FEET OF OLD ROCHESTER AVENUE AS SHOWN FOR PARCEL MAP 8550 E. Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, submitted by Lincoln Property Company for the future construction of a cul -de -sac street in connection with DR 84 -02, located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, north of 8th Street. October 3, 1984 1 5 8 10 11 15 16 19 • 0 City Council Agenda -3- RESOLUTION NO. 84-255 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME F. Release of Bonds: Tract No. 9658 - Located at 9th Street and Madrone. Release: Monumentation Bond $ 2,500.00 CUP 83 -04 - Located on the west side of Sapphire, South of Banyan. Release: Labor S Material Security $24,500.00 G. Approval of Award of Engineering Design Agreement for the reconstruction and improvement of Base Line Road from Teakway to Haven for the a= not to exceed $18,180.00 to be paid from Gas Tax and Systems Development Funds. H. Approval of request for authorization of additional funds for Contract Change Order 1 to Cooperative Agreement with Lowy Development per Council Resolution No. 84 -13. Recommend authorization of additional $16,000.00 expenditure of funds for relocation of 600+ feet of 8 inch watermain in Base Line Road, east of Hermosa. 1. Approval of Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Central School District for a Sewer easement to serve Bear Gulch Park. J. Approval of amendment to Salary Resolution No. 84 -190 to recognize three additional 1984 -85 budget authorized full -time positions. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -190A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE SALARY RESOLUTION NO. 84 -190 October 3, 1984 26 27 29 43 48 52 53 City Council Agenda -4- October 3, 1984 • X. Approval to authorize staff to commence negotiations 54 regarding CATV service program proposals with the companies presently operating in Rancho Cucamonga. L. Set public hearing for November 17, 1984 for appeal of Planning Commission decision approving Tentative Tract 12726, A -M Company. 4. ADVERTISED PDSI.IC HEMIM A. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITION OF APPROVAL - 55 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -32 - BARMARIAN - The development of an industrial complex totaling 123,000 sq. ft. on 8 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5), located at the northwest corner of Center Avenue and 6th Street - AFN 209 - 261 -26. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT_ AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 8484 =02 - Amendments to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Sections 17.02.110, 17.08.090, 17.08.050 and 17.02.020, Title 17 of the Municipal Code, in relation • to time extensions, public bearing notification, transition of density, neighborhood compatibility (site plan design, landscaping, open apace, grading, architecture), and preservation of viewshed. Item continued from September 5, 1984 meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 233 (second reading) 71 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16, SECTION 1.401.11.2 OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE, IN RELATION TO TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSIONS ORDINANCE NO. 234 (second reading) 72 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17, SECTIONS 17.02.110, 17.08.090, 17.08.050, AND 17.02.020 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, IN RELATION TO TIME EXTENSIONS, PUBLIC NEARING NOTIFICATION, TRANSITION OF DENSITY, NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY (SITE PLAN DESIGN, LANDSCAPING, OPEN SPACE, GRADING AND ARCHITECTURE), AND PRESERVATION OF VIENSHED I City Council Agenda -5- October 3, 1984 • 5. 111*- 1DVKTisED HEmns A. CHANGE OF MUNICIPAL ELECTION DATE - Item continued from September 19, 1984 meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 236 (second reading) 78 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING THAT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHALL BE HELD ON THE SAME DAY AS THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION, NAMELY, THE FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE FIRST MONDAY OF NOVEMBER IN EACH EVEN NUMBERED YEAR 6. CITY MANAM'S STAFF REPORTS A. DISCUSSION OF AMBULANCE NATTERS PERTAINING TO 79 REGULATIONS OF AMBULANCE SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Item continued from September 19, 1984 meeting. • B. A REQUEST FROM SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS FOR TAX EXEMPT BOND 91 FINANCING C. A REPORT ON THE STATUS OF EFFORTS TO REDUCE CONGESTION 92 AT AND EXAMINE ALTERNATE ACCESS TO THE DEER CANYON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL D. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 98 BEAR GULCH PARR E. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE NAMING OF THE UNNAMED PARR 100 SITE ON CHURCH STREET. EAST OF TURNER AVENUE AS CHURCH STREET PARR RESOLUTION NO. 84 -256 101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE NAMING OF THE UNNAMED PARK SITE ON CHURCH STREET AS CHURCH STREET PARK L J City Council Agenda -6- October 3, 1984 F. PROPOSED AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CARL WARNECKE AND 102 ASSOCIATES FOR TEE DESIGN OF A CIVIC AND PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY ON LAND OWNED BY THE CITY NEAR HAVEN AND FOOTHILL G. REQUEST TO SET DATE FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR PERSONNEL MATTERS RELATED TO CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 7. COUNCIL NOSIRSS 8. ADJOBIAMENT 0 -.10- 3 -84 LIST OF WARRANTS PAYEE 10 A E R TIRE SERVICE 3 A -1 LINEN 2 A -AABLE LOCK C KEY 13 ACTION BUSINESS MACHINES 682 THE ANDEN GROUP 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 661 ATLAS POOLS 665 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING, WEST 677 B E B CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. 679 8 E C GROWERS 31 BANK OF AMERICA NT C SA 33 BASELINE HARDWARE - 33 BASELINE HARDWARE 186 BEDROSIAN, NOTCH 676 BETTER BUSINESS CORP. PLUMBING 253 BILL C WAG'S INC 41 BISHOP COMPANY 657 BRALCO METALS -- 681- BUSINESS CUMPUTING 53 C G ENGINEERING 666 C.M.T.A. - -102 CA ST DEPT. TRANSPORTATION 683 CALIFORNIA COMPUTER SCHOOL 652 CARL'S UNIFORM SALES - -68- CITIES SIGN SERVICE 6!5 CONSTRUCTION CO. „I 4ee U S A, INC 6N SPORTING 609DS 651 CHUCK BRADEN WELDING 74 CITY RENTAL lA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LA 650PUTER ROOM SUPPLY STORE 130 R SERVICE CO i. -86 CROWDER DEVELOPMENT CORP. { 660 CTS 85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST ��..-_-�.,,7— CUCARO%GA PRINTING_ �; 1 DA14L, WALDEN MAINTENANCE 92 DAILY REPORT 100 OEROISH SUERRA E ASSOC. I 0 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 1 ITEM OESCR -------------------------------------------------------- WARR# WARR.AMT. es CHECK# OVERLAP SHERIFFS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 00009 1,363.14 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER E OTHER ITEMS 00010 202.50 KEYS 00011 15.90 OFFICE EQUIPMENT E OTHER ITEMS 00012 2,342.46 REFUND- MORTGAGE BOND DEPGSIT 00013 9,419.47 CONTRACT SERVICES 00014 15,000.00 OVERPAYMENT ON PERMIT 84 -6375 00015 10.00 OVERPAYMENT ON BUSINESS LICENSE CCC16 72.00 MAINT SUPPLIES 00017 308.99 MAINT SUPPLIES 00018 1,007.00 VISA 4024-0046-1704 -2 C OTHER ITEMS 00019 975.01 VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIE C OTHER ITEMS 00020 118.42 MAINT SUPPLIES C OTHER ITEMS 00021 25.19 INSPECTOR VICTORIA PROJECT 00022 3,550.00 EQUIPMENT OCC23 36.50 ROAD SERVICE 00024 42.00 MAINT SUPPLIES 00025 117.85 OVERPAYMENT ON BUSINESS LICENSE COC26 23.00 SUBSCRIPTION 00027 14.75 ARCHIBALD FAU ROADWAY C OTHER ITEMS 00028 10,875.90 TREASURERS HANDBOOK 00029 35.00 SIGNALS E LIGHTING 00030 2,397.25 COMPUTER CLASS 00031 72.00 UNIFORMS ODC32 1,516.33 MAINT SUPPLIES C0033 55.65 REFUND DEPOSIT ON BARRICADES PERMIT 00035 500.00 7920750028 00035 59.17 MAINT SUPPLIES 00036 260.07 GATE FOR ALTA LOMA C VINEYARD PARKS 00037 610.00 EQUIPMENT TRAILER 00038 130.00 SEPT RENT C OTHER ITEMS 00039 148.70 COMPUTER SUPPLIES C OTHER ITEMS 00040 22.48 AUGUST MAINTENANCE C OTHER ITEMS 00041 1,485.48 REFUND ON PERMIT 84 -6220 00042 7.00 TYPEWRITER MAINT RENE E OTHER ITEMS 00043 1,320.00 TRACT 9348 -PKY E OTHER ITEMS 00044 404.18 FOUNDERS DAY PARADE C OTHER ITEMS 00045 3,840.93 SEPTEMBER MAINTENANCE 00046 1,650.00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL E OTHER ITEMS C0047 666.C9 BEAR GULCH ACCESS RDA C OTHER ITEMS 00048 7,074.00 10- 3 -64 LIST OF WARRANTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 2 PAYEE ITEM DESCR WARRN WARR.AMT. ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- - - - - -- 107 OETCO __219 DICKSON CO, INC 118 THE EMPIRE CO. 121 F C E CHECK PROTECTOR 125 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS. CO. 127 FONTANA WOOD PRESERVING 244 GEMOC 137 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 519 GENERAL WHOLESALE PRCOUCTS 358 GPS CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 660 GREENWAY C ASSOCIATES 145 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 663 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW 157 HOLLEY, WILLIAM L. 158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. 495 HYDRO -SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC 163 IBM 673 IDEAS UNLIM17EO 506 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT - - -169 INTL CONF. SLOG OFFICIALS 172 J. N. CONCRETE 569 JERSEY INTL. GROUP, INC. 646 JIM BUTLER OLDS 175 JOBS AVAILABLE 678 KING TOOL C EQUIPMENT RENTAL 114 KRUSE,. JOAN A 635 -PAUL LA JOIE 50 IINVI LLE- SANDERSON C ASSOCIATES 222 frlB. *-] POWER TOOLS 669 LOWY DEVELOPMENT CORP. 668 LRYD 0. GOOLSBY 66L,AND COMPANY i 1]] MLAN, BURFO RD C ARIAS 644 LOCK SUPPLY, INC. 't 621 NINAGERENT SERVIOCES INSTITUTE 250 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 653 R.D. MASTON S! - MATLOCK t WINEBERG 28 NC KAUGNAN, ROBERT , P.E. IBS MAMAN DESK OF ONTARIO, INC 670 AEL T. TURNER OFFICE SUPPLIES C OTHER ITEMS 00049 165.36 SEPT STREET SWEEPING 00050 2,362.50 INSURANCE 00051 309.00 SERVICE CALL -CHECK PROTECTOR C0052 82.74 LOT BOOK 00053 50.00 KODAK KOS 00054 66.46 CASSETTE TAPES 00055 56.95 980 -2634 C OTHER ITEMS 00056 2,234.03 AhTl STATIC MAT 00057 95.88 CONTRACT SERVICES 00058 776.00 PATHFINDER MEETINGS 00059 1,580.00 FUEL 00060 367.19 PRIh7EO MATERIALS 00061 47.00 TRAVEL -HOLLEY CCC62 20C.00 ASPHALT C OTHER ITEMS 00063 814.44 MAINT SUPPLIES C OTHER ITEMS 00064 324.34 SEPT RENTAL AND USAGE C OTHER ITEMS 00065 1,932.65 IDEAS UNLIMITED PUBLICATION COC66 117.00 ASPHALT 00067 97.52 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE MANUAL 00066 18.39 RELOCATE SIDEWALK 921C ARCHIBALD 00069 5,401.71 YVONNE JEAN ALLEN -CLA C OTHER ITEMS 00070 5,994.52 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 00071 155.16 ADVERTISEMENT 00072 84.80 RENTAL OF TRENCHER 00073 675.02 P.C. MEETING 9 -12 -84 C OTHER ITEMS 00074 50.00 OFFICE EQUIP RENTAL C OTHER ITEMS 00075 192.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES/ E OTHER ITEMS 00076 1,284.50 MAINT EQUIP 00077 637.06 PROGRESS ESTIMATE 01 00078 41,021.99 MILEAGE 00079 22.50 OVERPAYMENT ON BUSINESS LICENSE _ 00080 23.00 CLAIMANT RONALD PAYNE 00081 625.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00082 21.34 REGISTRATION FEE L.A. 1C-3C -B4 00083 155.00 SHERIFFS VEHICLE MAINTANCE 00084 2,093.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES C OTHER ITEMS 00065 74.20 ENCLOSE OFFICE IN FINANCE AREA 00086 3,488.00 CONTRACT PLAN CHECK 00087 220 OFFICE E C OTHER ITEMS 00088 2,986 REFUND OFWSTORATION DEPOSIT 00089 250. ._10- 3 -84 LIST OF WARRANTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 3 PAYEE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ITEM DESCR WARRN WARR.AMT. 118 RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES HELLMAN STORM DRAIN 00090 3,268.00 - 522 NATIONAL GRAPHIC SUPPLY ORAWSNG BOARD 00091 IOC.14 643 NATIONAL PURCHASING INSTITUTE MEMBERSHIP DUES 00092 75.00 230 NSI INC COMPUTER RENTAL C OTHER ITEMS 00093 530.54 231 NEMAK INC. OCTOBER 1 RENTAL 00091 2,151.75 306 ORTON, LLOYD R CONTRACT PLAN CHECK COC95 1,6J0.00 229 PACIFIC PRODUCTS, INC MAINT SUPPLIES E OTHER ITEMS 00096 735.34 111 PACIFIC SPRAYERS TREE SPRAYING 00097 i5.00 656 PAS GRAPHICS OFFICE SUPPLIES E OTHER ITEMS 00098 992.38 649 PEACE OFFICERS RESEARCH ASSOC. MEMBERSHIP 00099 375.00 587 JAMES 0. PEARCE CONTRACT PLAN CHECK C OTHER ITEMS 00100 1,600.00 255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO GASOLINE 00101 8,498.21 251 R C R AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 00102 3CC.81 228 RANCHO CUCA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REPAY RDA RED FOR 111 SEATTLE FIRST 00103 169.47 474 RANCHO MEDICAL CLINIC AUGUST PHYSICALS 00101 45040 1000 A N RE17ER DEVELOPMENT CO OCTOBER RENT 00105 8,556.80 112 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS FILM C OTHER ITEMS OO1C6 59.23 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT OFFICE EQUIP E OTHER ITEMS 00107 2,102.59 521 ROOT, LESLIE D CONTRACT PLAN CHECK 00108 2,OOD.00 303 SAN BERNARDINO CO. SURVEYOR ASSESS UPDATES C OTHER ITEMS 00109 53.95 664 SCI -ARC CONTINUING EDUCA71ON SYMPOSIUM -RICK GOMEZ 00110 75.00 126 SEVEN DAY AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS E OTHER ITEMS 00111 63.58 655 SHERATON WORLD ROOM RESERVATION NAP /HOLLEY C0112 370.00 36 SEA SMIDERLE P.D.C. MINUTES 9120185 00113 5C.0C 641 SMISER FREIGHT SERVICE MAINT SUPPLIES 00114 25.19 -- 317 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 9187 SN BOND C OTHER ITEMS 00115 5,305.i3 317 SOUINERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 31 BASELINE-MARINE N. E OTHER ITEMS 00116 658.17 317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 7329 CENTER SPA C OTHER ITEMS C0117 661.15 317 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 6524 BERYL C OTHER ITEMS 00118 44.41 318 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 6057 CARNELIAN C OTHER ITEMS 00119 272.86 319 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 111 N GROVE AVE CC12C 12.15 2_-SPAOKLEITS _ MONTHLY RENTAL C OTHER ITEMS 00121 153.82 323 STANDARD BRANDS PAINT MAINT SUPPLIES E OTHER ITEMS 00122 87.61 330 STATIONERS CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES E OTHER ITEMS 00123 1,351.39 - 330 STATIONERS CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES C OTHER ITEMS D0124 295.62 334 STOCKWELL C SINNEY OFFICE SUPPLIES C0125 62.75 ' 376 SULLIVAN, R CONTRACT SERVICES 00126 3,290.00 :�- .._279- --IME- SUIT -- AD NUMBER 256751 C OTHER ITEMS 00127 216.82 1 331 SUPPLIERS, THE MAINT EQUIP 00128 1,433.23 401 T C 0 INSTALLATION, INC REPLACE BLOWER SWITCH C OTHER ITEMS 00129 128.45 .� 424 TEXACO, INC GAS 00130 28.70 10- 3 -84 LIST OF WARRANTS PA' reo 341 675 662 630 478 213 645 365 647 509 654 370 !EE TIBINI SYSTEMS, INC TRANS -WEST FORD TRUCK THE TROPHY CASE U C REGENTS VALLEY SOUND CARL WARREN C CO WA%IE, KLEEN -LINE CORP WESTERN MAYFLOWER D. WILLIAMS PRINTING O.F. WOLFINBARGER XEROX CORPORATION YOUNG-5 YUKON DISPOSAL SERVICE • • RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 4 ITEM CESCR WARRB WARR.AMT. PRINTER CABLE 00131 121.20 CREDIT /WARRANTY C OTHER ITEMS 00132 5.63 MEDALS C OTHER ITEMS 00133 729.55 SEMINAR -LLOYD C PAUL 00134 300.00 MAINT. SUPPLIES C 07HER ITEMS 00135 79.50 CONTRACT SERVICES F OTHER ITEMS 00136 253.35 MAINT SUPPLIES C OTHER ITEMS 00137 399.66 VAN C 2 MEN 00138 130.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00139 229.44 MULCH 00140 450.50 MONTHLY RENTAL AUGUST C OTHER ITEMS C0141 1,664.49 OFFICESUPPLIES 00142 30.37 POLICE STATION TRASH DISPOSAL 00143 70.00 TOTAL CHECKS 196,870.51 • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTR, DON SEP 181984 Vincent (Jim) Broneatello wn_ali rw 8595 Willow Drive Cucamonga, CA 91730 September 17, 1984 Robert A. Rizzo Assisstant To The Manager 9320 Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Sir On Sunday, September 17, 1984, my family and I decided to go for a ride in the evening. Our house is located in the Village Park Community area. Since there are only a limited number of routes by which we could leave our development, we chose the Salina to Malvern exit. This brought us in front of the city's recreation- al center, with its new addition. As we drove by, our car hit an • object in the road; the light was fading and it was impossible to differentiate between the object and the pavement. The object turned out to be a very sharp piece of metal which as apparently cast from the work site. Needless to say, the metal tore a large, unrepairable gash in the right rear tire. As was previously stated, the tire was hopelessly damaged, and had to be replaced. The steel wheel upon which the tire turned, was also ruined and a substitute was needed. The cost of replacing the tire was $45.87. The replacement cost for the wheel was $31.50. I have attached copies of the repair sheets to verify that I am not fabricating anything. As the sheet shows, I decided to buy two tires. The cost on the tire repair sheet was divided to arrive at the afore mentioned tire replacement figure. Since the damages done to my tire and wheel came about ny negligence on the part of some worker at the city financed construction site, I feel that I should be reimbursed for damages, The city owes me a total of $77.37 for the tire and wheel. In conclusion, I believe that it is only fair that I be compensated for my damaged vehicle parts. I have completed the necessary forms and am attaching this letter as further explanation of the situation. Please respond as quickly as possible. • Respectfully, Vincent (Jim) Broncatello VJBIms f,Q,AjC ALL LLIQ'S F WHEELS & ACCESSORIES I ri I LES I IAANK�" F: J)F� 0:4409 EAST MISSION BLVD. M 714/591-4900 OR 591-0231 !�kjr,!vJN(3 YIJUP 11RE PNIM NF.EUI- Ll . 10 ';! ! ,1 '9 POMONA CA 91766, FOR S CASH 0 H L I 0: P: T T 0 0 MILEAGE� REFERENCE SNIP V.A 177 TOCK WHEEL ALANCE PASSrNt36R (y) jo oo rn o S. ()U OL SUB-10TAL — 1 j mwn I NAME ADDRESS CITY F-7Z owuYf eOEJ ..E. A .x . E ..nwuaxo xcxuxo v m.em JI. 1;i 6 J uc3.xos ]. masn n. Iw3 V14.3 us vl4s ]. nnw. ]m A'! RF<AIF AMIC.FI PAID OUT ADJ. CREDIT _ — -_ —_.. DUAN. PART NUMBER 0E 5 C RIP i ION uwl IuEI+oEO uNn" Ex1EEOfR IOtAL DRICE EFCISE EIICISE EEICE PPKE /. / I 1 I TAXABLE AMOUNT - (R1 %SALES TAX ./ TERMS: INET loth PROX.) FINANCE CHARGE IS COMPUTED BY A "PERIODIC RATE" OF 11/i% PER MONTH WHICH 15 AN • ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 18%. P.O. NO. �ATURE L—J VC I 40FOUTHERN V I 505 WEST HOLT STREET POMONA, CALIFORNIA 91766 NAME ADDRESS CITY F-7Z owuYf eOEJ ..E. A .x . E ..nwuaxo xcxuxo v m.em JI. 1;i 6 J uc3.xos ]. masn n. Iw3 V14.3 us vl4s ]. nnw. ]m A'! RF<AIF AMIC.FI PAID OUT ADJ. CREDIT _ — -_ —_.. DUAN. PART NUMBER 0E 5 C RIP i ION uwl IuEI+oEO uNn" Ex1EEOfR IOtAL DRICE EFCISE EIICISE EEICE PPKE /. / I 1 I TAXABLE AMOUNT - (R1 %SALES TAX ./ TERMS: INET loth PROX.) FINANCE CHARGE IS COMPUTED BY A "PERIODIC RATE" OF 11/i% PER MONTH WHICH 15 AN • ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 18%. P.O. NO. �ATURE L—J ..E. A .x . E ..nwuaxo xcxuxo v m.em JI. 1;i 6 J uc3.xos ]. masn n. Iw3 V14.3 us vl4s ]. nnw. ]m A'! RF<AIF AMIC.FI PAID OUT ADJ. CREDIT _ — -_ —_.. DUAN. PART NUMBER 0E 5 C RIP i ION uwl IuEI+oEO uNn" Ex1EEOfR IOtAL DRICE EFCISE EIICISE EEICE PPKE /. / I 1 I TAXABLE AMOUNT - (R1 %SALES TAX ./ TERMS: INET loth PROX.) FINANCE CHARGE IS COMPUTED BY A "PERIODIC RATE" OF 11/i% PER MONTH WHICH 15 AN • ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 18%. P.O. NO. �ATURE L—J RF<AIF AMIC.FI PAID OUT ADJ. CREDIT _ — -_ —_.. DUAN. PART NUMBER 0E 5 C RIP i ION uwl IuEI+oEO uNn" Ex1EEOfR IOtAL DRICE EFCISE EIICISE EEICE PPKE /. / I 1 I TAXABLE AMOUNT - (R1 %SALES TAX ./ TERMS: INET loth PROX.) FINANCE CHARGE IS COMPUTED BY A "PERIODIC RATE" OF 11/i% PER MONTH WHICH 15 AN • ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 18%. P.O. NO. �ATURE L—J • ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 18%. P.O. NO. �ATURE L—J L • is rTTV nn` n n \T`Un PT'l n AfnXTr n STAFF REPORT DATE: October 3, 1984 19.E TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Tract 12809 Submitted by Lewis Development Company and Located on the Northside of Baseline Road Between Milliken Avenue and Deer Creek Channel. Tract 12809 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 26, 1984 for the division of 100 acres of land into 11 lots within the Terra Vista Planned Community for a City Park. Improvements are to be constructed by the City per the agreement between Lewis Development Company and the City signed on May 24, 1984. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract Map 12809 and authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign same and cause to record. ReSpectfull so i/ttttedd,� LBH:SK:ko Attachments 0 • u♦ r�. F 1.' II�1 2 L�n�a n — Sn n 7KY! — qen Mx a ®.c4a .�rn.c. "• a.sf /nccnf e+9nrr.rr nnw ao ;N/%n TENTATIVESHEET , OF 1 SHEETS TRACT NO. 12809 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA r•[wn'. one Y[MOlcvoa —�' ntt[n�u[ rtnn.s ryKN .M.aYf�� [ann. n v . ones uYa aa. �,�r. a a. ua ui III on :nun SIR( "Nf u♦ r�. F 1.' II�1 2 L�n�a n — Sn n 7KY! — qen Mx a ®.c4a .�rn.c. "• a.sf /nccnf e+9nrr.rr nnw ao ;N/%n • RESOLUTION NO. 48 89 0@0 JV -ASX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12809 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12809, consisting of 11 lots, submitted by Lewis Development Company, Subdivider, located on the north side of Base Line Road between Milliken Avenueand Deer Creek Channel has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That the Final Map be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 1984. AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST:. Beverly A. Authelet, City Cler jaa • Jan 0. Mike s, Mayor riTV nP A e ATCAn CI TC e VVIUC e Parcel Map 8550 was approved by Planning Commission on July 25, 1984 for the division of 14.38 acres of land into 7 parcels in the General Industrial District (Sub Area 13) located on the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and 7th Street. The developer is also requesting a 6 foot vacation of a portion of Rochester Avenue. This vacation is a result of the re- alignment of Rochester Avenue to facilitate the 7th Street Freeway Ramp. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 8550 and authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign same. In addition, it is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution summarily vacating a portion of Rochester Avenue and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and cause same to be recorded. Respectfully submit ed, 1' LBH/BK: Attachments 0 STAFF REPORT °y "Q =. rot1'1 DATE: October 3, 1984 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 8550 and Request for a Summary Vacation of 6 Feet of Rochester Avenue Submitted by Richard Wagner and Located on the Southwest Corner of Rochester Avenue and 7th Street. Parcel Map 8550 was approved by Planning Commission on July 25, 1984 for the division of 14.38 acres of land into 7 parcels in the General Industrial District (Sub Area 13) located on the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and 7th Street. The developer is also requesting a 6 foot vacation of a portion of Rochester Avenue. This vacation is a result of the re- alignment of Rochester Avenue to facilitate the 7th Street Freeway Ramp. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 8550 and authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign same. In addition, it is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution summarily vacating a portion of Rochester Avenue and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and cause same to be recorded. Respectfully submit ed, 1' LBH/BK: Attachments 0 'a 0 � I wr � [Of J9 YCCNC5�C4`N E )IIO y llanY4 •e +'r 4Yl4aY W' ° -I I 1pYtYG- GNla.l IYOyNa..� r4 •.\ �I +I sl I • r![Y ..r A 1 - ; TCe.TP.TwH PARCEL MAP N0. 8550 • "" IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I- �,:" ,,,,,,,,_ , ,,° ______ -- tr � I wr � [Of J9 YCCNC5�C4`N E )IIO y llanY4 •e +'r 4Yl4aY W' ° -I I 1pYtYG- GNla.l IYOyNa..� r4 •.\ �I +I sl I • r![Y ..r A 1 - ; 0 PROJECT: SITE L y/ + '��i ii� �.•.. °. _ -� � _ilia Li . —4th --jEREEI C, CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA A ENGINEERING DIVISION NXIMTN: N page page _ r L. D. King, Inc. 317 N Eur. :d Avenue Ontann CaLfnrnia 91762 17141 988 5492 E%GINEERS.PLANNERS September 18, 1984 File: 559 -08 Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Subject: Request for the Vacation of a Portion of Old Rochester Avenue Right -of Way - Tentative Parcel May 8550 Dear Mr. Hubbs: On behalf of the property owner, Richard Wagner, et al, please consider this request for the vacation of the westerly 6' of Old Rochester Avenue right -of -way as shown on Parcel Map 8550. • The conditions of approval provided for the vacation of the westerly 3'. The master plan right -of -way is 54' and there presently exists 60' of right -of -way. The original Map of Rochester Avenue created a 120' right - of -way for Old Rochester Avenue (Orange Avenue). The easterly 60' of this right -of -way was vacated December 18, 1936, O.R. Book 1177, Page 320, thereby creating the 60' right -of -way as it exists today. A balanced vacation of 3' on the west side and 3' on the east side would creat a 54' master plan right -of -way. The vacated 3' strip of property on the east side,of Old Rochester Avenue should pass, by law to the adjoining pro- perty on the west side of Old Pochester Avenue. It is therefore requested thatthe westerly 6' of Old Rochester Avenue be vacated. Your consideration of this request is appreciated. Cordially, D. H. MAYS, P.S. Branch Manager DHM /bk cc: Richard Wagner 0 iy Offmm in ONTARIO and SANTA ANA • RESOLUTION N0, i@ 89 87CR tV—vtS3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, G4.IFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8550 (TENTATIVE PARLZL MAP NO. 8550 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8550 submitted by Richard Wagner, et al and consisting of 7 parcels, located at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and 7th Street, being a division of a portion of Lots 37 and 38 of Rochester as per map recorded in Book 9, Page 20 of maps, records of San Bernardino County was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 8550 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 8550 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of October 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa J Jon 0. Mi a s, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. i8 8i Qi6p tcf-Ary • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF THE WESTERLY 6 FEET OF OLD ROCHESTER AVENUE AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 8550. WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City Street hereinafter more particularly described: and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that the Westerly 6 feet of Old Rochester Avenue is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes because it has been superceded by relocation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating that portion of street on Map V -39 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part thereof. • SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said Wester-Ty-6 feet of Old Rochester Avenue no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of October 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authe et, City Clerk jaa on a s, ayor EXHIBIT "A" That portion of (Old) Rochester Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State • of California, as per Parcel Map No. 8550, recorded in Book , of Parcel Maps, pages and in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more pafticularlyyescribed as follows: Commencing at the centerline intersection of (Old Rocheste• Avenue and 6th Street; thence South 00 10'55" West, along the centerline of (Old) Rochester Avenue, 660.17 feet; thence North 890 49'05" West, a distance of 24.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 890 42155" West, to the Westerly right -of -way of (Old) Rochester Avenue, a distance of 6.00 feet; thence North 0° 10'55" East, along the westerly right -of -way of (Old) Rochester Avenue, a distance of 139.83 feet to a point in a curve concave Southwesterly, having a radius of 473.00 feet, a radial line to said point being North 81° 02141" East; thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 90 08'14" an arc length of 75.43 feet to a tangent line, said line being parallel to and 24.00 feet West of the centerline of (Old) Rochester Avenue; thence South 00 10155" West along said tangent line 114.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing approximately 0.02 acre. r 1 \J 11 W r uJ W zz _ 10 ;. DEDICATED TO TO THE CITY 1 Q l O RANCHO CUCAMONGA. Gth STREETy Ojs� 1297. IG a N 4 i� 0 z E 2 3G. 514 0 a PARCEL 4 N N N I. GIO AC. 3 'n � - a NET p Nt FLUS1-1, NO REF. N 0 3 19 S N :_K ..... O Z 2� 1238.89' 1 s a 260.00. -- 4GZ.37' _3 0 N NN 0 Z 0 m m PARCEL 5 1.138 AC. NET 2p•�4 �' `a 0 '31 a e FD. I" I.P. 4 TAG "CITY ENG, R.C.E. 23889', FLUS1-1, NO REF. 0 (L 7 th ST. sd m in n m PARCEL 7 41,E 3.Q.BG AC. NCI O2 NET l(tPD.) IW O'WIDE PORTION OF COLO)ROCHESTER N AVENUE RIW VACATED ax THE CITY I)N OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COl1NC1L m . RESOLLL mom AS SHOWN ON DOG. NO. $Z O.R. --� 129G.88' (129G.92 ) o =—OFFER OF DED- .-, ICATION TO THE CITY OF RANCHO r' CUCAMONGA FOR STREET PURPOS e N n m r 0„ m �ma m SN 5 W • m Li) Z W 9 / N Q( I W 30N z LLJ D f u ^^0' SEARCHED F[ �_ LL NOTHING, SET .-. NOTHING, EST Q By PROPORTION J � 0 0 U • n Development Review 84 -02 was approved by Planning Commission on April 25, 1984 with the condition the developer provide a lien agreement for the future construction of a cul -de -sac street at the west property line. Lincoln Property Company has submitted the attached Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement to satisfy this condition. RECOMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and cause to record. Respeftfu l ly svbmtt�d, LBH:Bko l Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CijCAargy STAFF REPORT DATE: October 3, 1984 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement Submitted by Lincoln Property Company for the Future Construction of a Cul -De- Sac Street in Connection with D.R. 84 -02 Located on the West Side of Rochester Avenue, North of 8th Street. Development Review 84 -02 was approved by Planning Commission on April 25, 1984 with the condition the developer provide a lien agreement for the future construction of a cul -de -sac street at the west property line. Lincoln Property Company has submitted the attached Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement to satisfy this condition. RECOMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and cause to record. Respeftfu l ly svbmtt�d, LBH:Bko l Attachments VAO • • �bjl I t roperty Ai ant zF- Lan 0 ""po -Rom, • RECORDING REQUESTED BY: and WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. Be. 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered Into this day of , 19 , by and pet ween Lincoln Property company o11,^ California Limited Partnershio Y . 6 (hcreina Pte, referred to as "Developer-), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), provided as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the Issuance Of a building permit for D. R. E4-02 development, the City requires • the construction of missing off -site street improvements including curb, gutter, asphalt pavement and appurtenant work adjacent to the property to be developed; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and WHEREAS, the City la agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enters Into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expanse to the City, after demand to do so by the City, Which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer Pails or neglects to do so and that the City shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer0a performance, and any repayment due City, NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: 1. The Developer hereby agrees that it will install off - site street improvements including curb, gutter, asphalt pavement and appurtenant work in accordance and compliance With all applicable ordinances resolutions, rules and regulations of the City In effect at the time of the Installation. Said improvements &hail be installed upon and along Cul -de -Sac Street as shown on 0 deed recorded a Do cu men t No. sa recorded in the County of San Bernsedinh, State of California. Not to exceed the n.n ter :i -na if said street ar beycnd the frontage of subject property except a9 rmq',,ad to prp'v:de toe 2]ne' :a-.e drainage and trlf.io trsnsition per City Standards. 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed b later than one ;I) year fh i lc w h written notice to the Drielhper .Trim the t; to commence -nsta tcst ion of the same. Instal :at :an of said Improvements z.c I be at n- expense to the City• 3• In the event the Developer shall fall or re ^.Ise to aomp l e to tha installation of said Improvements in a timely canner, City may at any time thereafter, upon givtcg the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete said lmprovanents and recover all comb of chaplet Lou incu. red by the City Tm th< Developer .. 4, To ecur_ the performance by Inc Ine Developer of the, terms and condibtons of this Agrnctent and .o secare the repayment to City of any fu.is which may be expended by City In completing said improvetents upon de.rault by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following descr; bed real property situated In the city of Rancho Cucamonga, County or San Be,- nardina, State of California, tc -.,L: That land situated to the City of Ranehn Cucamonga, County of San Bereerdino, State of California, described as follow: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Let 30 of the Map of Rochester per Book 9, page 20 of Maps, records of said County; Thence along the north line of said lot 30 North 89° 43' 214 Bast 1297.34 feet to the Northeast career of said lot 30; Thence along the easterly line of Lot 30 and Lot 31, of maid Map of nocheate. South 0* 24. 05- Nast 766.13 feet to the Southeast career of said Lot 31; Thence along the southerly line of said Lot 31 South BOO 09' 56w West 1298.63 feet to the Soutbweet corner of said Lot 31; Thence 41006 the westerly line of said Lot 31 and said Lot 30 North • Ut 25' 464 East 800.61 feet to the Northwest corner Of said Let 30 and the Point of Beglnolmg. 8a0epting therafroa the east 20 feat Of said lots as shown on deed raoardad on , 1904 28 Document Me, , County of Ban Eernaralao, Sts e of Ca liforaia. { ads ... e • 5. This conveyance is in trust for the purposes described above. _ 6. Now. therefore. if the Developer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void, otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California. and any other applicable statute. pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. 8. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the term "Developer" shall be "mortgagor" and the City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the Civil Code of • the State of California and any other statute oertaininq to mortgages on real property. 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the mortgage created hereby. then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and such re ... nable attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court. 10. If the real property described in Paragraph 1 hereof is subdivided in accordance with the California Subdivision Map Act, Cal. Gov. Code Sections 66410 at seq., and the ordinances of the City which are applicable thereto, the City shall cause to be reconveyed from the lien of this Agreement all legal parcels within such real property which exist after such subdivision and which do not have any frontage along the street described in Paragraph 1 hereof. 11. Upon the request of Developer, the City will reconvey the lien of this Agreement from the real property described in Paragraph e hereof if the Developer posts with the City a completion bond with respect to the lien -free completion of the improvements which are to be completed pursuant to Paragraph 1 hereof in an amount equal to one 3 and one -half times the estimated cost of such improvements.• reasonably determined by the City, and if the bonding company and the form of such bond are satisfactory to the City, as reasonably determined by the City. 12. Upon the request Of Developer, the City will cause the lien of the mortgage created by this Agreement to be subordinated, in a legally effective manner, to the lien of any and all mortgages and deeds of trust, and all advances of the proceeds of all loans secured thereby and all other amounts secured thereby, provided that: the total outstanding principal amount of all such loans at any time shall not exceed the amount of $9.350.000; such loans shall not bear interest at a rate per annum in excess of (i) the "prime rate" of interest from time to time announced by the Bank of America or other nationally recognised lending institution plus (ii) 24 per annum; and the proceeds of such loans are used for the payment of the direct and indirect costs of developing and constructing on- and off -site improvements to the real property described in Paragraph 4 hereof, • other costs and expenses related thereto, including, without limitation, interest and loan fees, costs of consultants, such as engineering and architectural consultants, legal fees, Developer's Overhead costs and fees and the costs of permits and other governmental charges. L IN WITNESS 'WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement On the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: Jon D. Mngela Mayor ATTEST Beverly A. Authe:et DEVELOPER Lincoln Property Company No. 611, �Cim It e� mar cnership Erik M. Hansen. Partner City Clerk e................. uuauaauaaueu.sa• a a•ouuaau.uaa.s.• / STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERN Afl DI NO7 On ,19_,befort ma the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared JON D. O MRANCH • personally known to me to the Mayor or the CITY OF RANCHO NO be AMONGe CALIFORNIA, ho executed a municipal wit corporation, and known to me to mu irte person ors executed cite within instrument on behalf of said corporation corporation, and acknowledged is me that ouch municipal oorDOrac ton eke toted a. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. Notary Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF SAN BEA WARDING) On this the day, of hero re me, the undersigned Notary Public personally appeared ( 1 personally known to me ( 7 proved to me on the has is of satisfactory evidence to be the person(.) xhona name(.) subscribed to the within 1nStrvment and acknowleged that executed It. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Signature NOTE: WHEN DOCUMENT IS EIRCUTED BY 1 CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, THE ABOVE AC RNON LRDCEMENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION /PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS REQUIRED. RESOLUTION NO. - i6 BB BIOR Ptl -Ast • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance: and WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement established as prerequisite to issuance of building permit for O.R. 84 -02 has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Lincoln Property Company. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of October 1984 AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Aut a et, City Clerk jaa I Jon U. Mike s, Mayor • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 3, 1984 TO: City Council and City Manager ,l FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Enginee, SUBJECT: Release of Bonds , Tract No. 9658 - located at 9th Street and Madrone DEVELOPER: Richwood Development Co. 2305 Montecelo Dr. San Marino, California Release of Monumentation Bond $2,500.00 Certification from McCutchan Engineering indicates that all final monuments have been set and they have been paid in full. It is recommended that City Council authorize the release of the Monumentation Bond in the amount of $2,500.00. C.U.P. 83 -04 - located on the West side of Sapphire, South of Banyan DEVELOPER: Alta Loma Christian Church 9774 19th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Release of Labor & Material Security $24,500.00 The contractor for the above referenced project has submitted copies of labor and material releases for all street improvement sub contractors. It is recommended that City Council authorize release of the Labor and Material Security in the amunt of $24,500.00 to Alta Loma Chrustian Church. continued... City Council Staff Report Release of Bonds October 3, 1984 • Page 2 Minor Subdivision 78 -0194 - located at the Southeast corner of 19th & Jasper SURETY: Family Savings & Loan Assoc. 3683 Crenshaw Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90016 Release of Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $12,343.64 Release of Labor and Material Bond (Road $12,343.64 M.S. 78 -0194 has been completed and it is recommended that City Council release the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds, each in the amount of $12,343.64. LBR: be • L J J 0 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 3, 1984 is -, TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Blane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award of Engineering Design Agreement for the Reconstruction and Improvement of Baseline Road from Teak Way to Haven. On September 13, 1984, two engineering design proposals were received from three pre - qualified firms invited by staff to submit proposals for the subject project. A tabulation of the two proposals received is attached for your consideration. The design and engineering firm of L. A. Wainscott and Associates, Inc. of Grande Terrace, California submitted the low proposal for a not to exceed fee of 818,180 for Plans, Specifications, Estimates (P.S. & E), Right of Way Engineering and a Pavement Investigation and Report. The subject project is included in the 1984 -85 Capital Project listing and has been assigned account number 22- 4637 -8050 for payment by Gas Tax and Systems Development Funds. RECOMMENDATION It is hereby recommended that the firm of L. A. Wainscott and Associates, Inc. be engaged for the preparation of Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimates, etc for the subject project. Respectfully sub tied, ?LHrWF: ko Attachments 0 r1 LJ BASE LINE ROAD Teak Way to Haven Avenue Reconstruction and Improvement Project No. 800 -84 -01 SUMMARY OF DESIGN P R 0 P 0 5 A L 5 TASK L. A. WAINSCOTT 1. Field Survey $ 2,880.00 2. Utility Research $ 1,000.00 3. Pavement Evaluation $ 2,500.00 4. Initial Study $ 500.00 5. Plans $ 6,000.00 6. R/W Description $ 1,300.00 7. Design File $ 200.00 8. Estimate S 600.00 9. Specs $ 1,500.00 10. Contract Exhibits $ 500.00 11. Meetings $ 700,00 12. Pre - Const. Conference $ 500.00 & Design Clarifications TOTAL $18,180.00 Const. Survey $ 2,400.00 L. D. KING $ 3,696.00 $ 850.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 350.00 $ 7,900.00 $ 750.00 $ 250.00 $ 800,00 $ 1,200.00 -- ---0---- $ 456.00 $ 456.00 $21,208.00 $10,000.00 ASSOCIATED J Q 0 a 0 a f 0 z J V W D 0 In the event of authorization, in writing, by the City of changes from the work as indicated in Exhibit A or for other written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated herein, additional compensation shall be allowed for such extra work based upon the Consultant's standard hourly rates (See Exhibit C). The Consultant shall submit invoices which specify the area where work was completed and the associated time for completion to the City for approval. The Consultant agrees to invoice the City for services rendered not more often than once a month. Work performed at the request of the City, outside the limit specified in this Agreement, is to be designated as "Extra Work" an monthly invoices. Work performed in connection with an authorized written change order will be so designated on said invoice. S. CITY SUPPORT. The City shall provide the following items of is support to the Consultant: a. Provide a staff engineer to work with the Consultant for the purpose of giving advice and to provide coordination within the scope of this Agreement. b. Make available and provide all existing data and 'information relevant to the proposed Project. c. Provide all right -of -way negotiations. d. Provide environmental processing. e. Provide plans and specifications for bidding. f. Prepare and Tail final utility notice. 6. SUSPENSION, TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion • hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least fifteen (15) days prior to -3- written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty -five (35) days of service of said notice, the City shall pay to the Consultant all earned and unpaid fees and costs based upon the rates attached 'hereto as Exhibit C, plus outside services, but the sum so paid shall not exceed a dollar figure which bears the same proportionate relationship to S i8.180.0o as the quantity of work completed by the consultant bears to 100% of the work prescribed herein. If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. 7. BREACH OF CONTRACT. If the Consultant defaults in the • performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of written notice of such default in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. OWNERSHIP OF 00CUMEATS. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. -4- Entire limits of liability maintained must be certified but in no event shall limits be less than specified hereinbelow. Any aggregate limitation of liability shall be separate as to the risks arising out of the • subject matter of this proposal. -5- 9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, emoloyees or agents are in any fanner officers, employees or agents of the City. 10. LEGAL RESPONSI31LITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, its officers and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the • Consultant to comply with this section. 11. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any moneys due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. 12. INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain general liability and workers compensation insurance coverage effective on the first day of work and in full force throughout the full term of this Agreement. The policy or policies shall be underwritten by insurers admitted to operate in the State of California, on forms no less broad in the scope of coverage than standard forms. Entire limits of liability maintained must be certified but in no event shall limits be less than specified hereinbelow. Any aggregate limitation of liability shall be separate as to the risks arising out of the • subject matter of this proposal. -5- • Coveraae Minimum Limit Workers' Cpmpensdtion S E ?plover's Liability 3100,000.00 Comprehensive General Liability / Comorehensive SS00,000.00 Auto Liability Combined single limit each occurance If requested, the Consultant agrees to deposit with the City, certificates of insurance a satisfy the City that insurance requirements of this Agreement have been complied with, and to keep such insurance in effect and the certificates therefore on deposit with the City during the entire term of this Agreement. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto and supersede all • negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. . IN 'WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSULTANT on 0. likels, Mayor Date: ATTEST: ever y A. Autne et, City ClerK ® APPROVED AV TO FORM: 8y L y Atto ney -6- L A Wains�coott /8 Associates, Inc. Title: President Date: September 18. 1984 Date: SEP J fi 1984 I1�Ij � II1 EXHIBIT A, SCOPE OF SERVICES The objective of the engineering services is to provide the City with a complete set of plans and specifications for the rehabilitation of approximately 3550 LF of Baseline Avenue. A separate engineering evaluation report will be prepared to document the existing pavement conditions and to present pavement rehabilitation recommendations. The scope of the engineering services and associated budgeted costs are as follows: Task 1 - Field Survey Field survey will be performed to develop the necessary design base maps and to located pavement failures. The field survey will: a. Establish centerline control and stationing. b. Pickup visible surface culture within the street right -of -way. C. Provide cross sections of existing ground surface at 50 foot intervals. d. Map location of pavement failures that have been premarked by the pavement evaluation team (see task 3). The budgeted cost for this task is $2,880.00. • Task 2 - Utility Research & Coordination The location of existing utilities within the project limits will be determined by researching available plans. The proposed design will be coordinated with affected utility agencies. Work under this task includes: a. Research and obtain utility maps of existing utilities. b. Plot existing utilities on base plans. c. Transmit plan sets with utility notice to affected agencies. d. Recommend utility conflict mitigation measures. e. Attend utility coordination meetings (up to two meetings are anticipated). The budgeted cost for this task is $600.00. Task 3 - Pavement Evaluation and Design An engineering evaluation report will be prepared to document the condition of the existing pavement, to present street rehabilitation recommendation and to provide design parameters for retaining wall design. The following items of work are anticipated under this task: • �a a. Perform a pavement condition survey within the project limits. Recommended removal areas will be field marked with paint for pickup by field surveyors (See Task 1). b. Three to six core samples will be taken to determine asphalt thickness and subgrade quality at selected locations. c. Laboratory analysis including R -Value testing will be performed. d. A Benkelman Beam Deflection Analysis will be performed to establish overlay requirements. e. Specific design recommendations for pavement overlay and replacement and retaining wall will be provided. The budgeted cost for this task is $2,000,00 Task 4 - En.vironmental Initial Study The City of Rancho Cucamonga's standard initial study questionaire parts I and II, will be completed by a member of our staff. It is anticipated that the proposed work wail not have a significant impact upon the environment and that the City will be able to prepare a Negative Declaration and complete the environmental review process. The budgeted cost for this task is $500.00 • 'ask 5 - Construction Plans Construction plans will be prepared in accordance with City standards. It is that one (1) title sheet, four (4) 40 scale plan and profile sheets and three (3) cross section sheets will be provided under this task. The construction plans will include the following improvements: a. Indicate existing street rehabilitation requirements (3500 lineal feet between stations 18 +00 and 53 +00) b. Widen south side of Baseline to 25 feet from centerline and install A.C. berm and sidewalk between Cambridge and Turner Avenues, (390 lineal feet between stations 22 +60 and 26 +50 ±). c. Widen south side of Baseline to 25 feet from centerlines and install AC berm between Turner and Center Avenues, (830 lineal feet between station 26 +70 and 35 +00 t). d. Construct approximately 350 lineal feet of 6 foot high retaining wall at south side of Baseline (between stations 23 +65 and 28 +20 -). e, Construct two new curb returns at intersection of Turner and Baseline Avenues (south side of Baseline). f, Construct street overflow deflector at Southeast corner of Baseline and Turner Avenues. g. Construct new curb return at Southwest corner of Ivy Lane and Baseline Avenues. 2 =a •h. Remove "tree island" at southwest corner of Ivy lane and Baseline and install new curb and gutter and sidewalk. The budgeted cost for this task is $6,000.00 Task 6 - R /'W Legal Descriptions Legal descriptions and right -of -way (R /W) plats will be prepared for use by the City in acquiring rights -of -way for additional dedications along the south side of Baseline Road between stations 23 +65 to 34 +95' . Four (4) parcels will be affected by the additional R/W dedications. The budgeted cost for this task is 51,300.00. Task 7 - Maintain Design Files Design files will be maintained as directed by the City and will be forwarded to the City upon project completion. The budgeted cost for this task is S200.00. Task 8 - Engineers Cost Estimate An engineers construction cost estimate will be prepared based upon a detailed quantity takeoff. • The budgeted cost for this task is $600.00. Task 9 - Specifications A complete contract specification will be prepared. The items of work under this task include: a. Write the special provisions referencing the "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction" (Green Book). b. Prepare the bid items schedule (contract proposal). C. List referenced standard drawings and insert copies into specification. d. Assemble specification into one original document and forward to the City. The budgeted cost for this task is $1,500.00. Task 10 - Contract Exhibits The following exhibits will be prepared by insertion into the Design, Services Agreement: a. Scope of services with estimated fees. b. A bar graph design schedule. 3 c � 0 The budgeted cost for this task is 5500.00. Task 11 — Staff Coordination Meetings A member of the project team will attend project coordination and design review meetings with the City staff as required. Up to 3 meetings are anticipated. The budgeted cost for this task is S700.00. Task 12 — pre — Construction Conference and Design Clarifications A member of the design team will attend the pre— construction conference. Also under tins task L A 'Aainscott & Associates will provide design clarification as required during construction. The budgeted fee for this task is 5500.00. 4 EXHIBIT B, PROJECT SCHEDULE PROJECT /TASK 'WEEKS 1 4 7 ! in i 11 19, 1. Field Survey p Ut i I .t ! 3. Pavement Evaluation ! ! . Environ. Initial 5. Preo. Const. Plans 6. R/W Legals and Plats ��1 �1 ►—� 7. Maintain Dpqinn ` 8. En r. Cost Esti. 9. Preo. Soecs. I. —� Rpl i Pw I I ! I aea I I ! I ! I I I ! I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mir I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Exhibit C SCHEDULE OF RATE Engineer ... ..........:.................... S 60.00 per hour Surveyor ... ............................... S 54.00 per hour Associate Engineer & Geologist............ S 54.00 per hour Engineering Technician .................... S 44,00 per hour Laboratory & Field Technician ............. S 35.00 per hour Engineering Aide .......................... S 33.00 per hour Three -Man Survey Crew ..................... S 120.00 per hour Two -Man Survey Crew ....................... S 101.00 per hour EDM - Total Station ....................... S 10.00 per hour Computer_ ................................ S .02 per CPU page- second Subsistance ............................... S 40.00 per day Clerical ... ............................... S 22.00 per hour Field Technician Vehicle .................. S 0.25 per mile 1) Fees and other charges will be billed monthly as the work progresses, and shall be due at the time of billing. 2) Client hereby agrees that the balance as stated on the billing from Engineer to Client is correct, conclusive and binding on the Client unless • Client within ten (10) days from the date of the making of the billing notifies Engineer in writing of the particular item that is alleged to be incorrect. 3) Any amounts not paid within thirty (30) days of the billing date shall be considered delinquent, and shall bear a service charge of one and one -half (1 112) percent per month on the unpaid balance not to exceed the maximum annual interest allowed by law. 4) Jobs-with estimates of less than $3.000.00 normally require a retainer of $1,000.00 or fifty (50) percent of the estimate, whichever is less, prior to work beginning. The balance will be due upon completion of the work /report. 5) .A 510.00 per hour per employee premium shall be paid for all overtime requested by the client. is May 1984 Contract AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this %�ii/,/ day of 0r,16 � c r ,19841, between the CITY OF RANC40 CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and L A Wainscott & Assoc. In hereinafter referred to as "Consultant ". 'WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City desires to prepare designs, construction plans, specifications and cost estimates for Reha6iiiration of aaseline Road between Teak Way and Haven Avenue _ 'hereinafter referred to as "Project "; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has the necessary skills and qualifications and licences required by law to perform the services required under this . Agreement in connection with said Project; and WHEREAS, the City desires to retain the Consultant for services hereinafter described in connection with said Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 3 r� day of 198 authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties that: 1. OEFINITIONS. As used in this Agreement, the following definitions shall be applicable: a. Consultant. Consultant shall meanL A Wainscott & Associates, Inc. a California Corporation located at 22400 Rarton Roan cite 200 Grand Terrace CA 92324 . b. City. City shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a 19 Municipal Corporation, located at 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. -1- c. City Council. City Council shall mean the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d. Services. Services shall mean the services to be oerformed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. e. Satisfactory. Satisfactory shall mean satisfactory to the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform for, and furnish to, the City the services described in Exhibit A, "Scope of Services" attached hereto. 3. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE, The Consulant agrees that it shall delingently and responsibly pursue the performance of the services required of it by this Agreement and that said services shall be completed within 84 calendar days after execution of this Agreement in accordance with the Project Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B. If a delay beyond the control of the Consultant is encountered, a time extension may be mutually agreed upon in writing by the City and the Consultant. The Consultant shall present documentation satisfactory to the City to substantiate any request for a time extension. 4. PAYMENT, Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, upon satisfactory completion of the services described in the "SCOPE OF SERVICES", (Exhibit A) the Consultant shall be compensated based upon the actual time spent on the Project at the Consultants standard hourly rates attached hereto as Exhibit C, plus outside services, but shall not exceed a total amount of S 18,180.00 -2- 0 • Ll • Y' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAVONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 3, 1984 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Senior Public Works Inspector 0cCA.tiFo, } 9 Y.7. V F Z 1977 SUBJECT: Request for Authorization of Additional Funds for Contract Change Order 1 to Cooperative Agreement with Lowy Development per Council Resolution Yo. 84 -13. Recommend Authorization of Additional $16,000.00 Expenditure of Funds for Relocation of 600+ Feet of 8 Inch Watermain in Baseline Road East of Hermosa. As previously approved, the City is currently participating in a Cooperative Agreement with Lowy Development for the construction of certain street and drainage improvements at Hermosa and Baseline. On August 17, 1984, the general contractor performing roadway grading in Baseline Road, east of Hermosa, (the City's portion) uncovered an existing, in service, 8 inch watermain owned and maintained by the Cucamonga County Water District. The watermain in question was shown on the approved plans and reported by the district as existing approximately 5 feet south of the south proposed A.C. Berm on Baseline outside of the limits of the proposed work. However, the actual location of the watermain proved to be approximately 8 feet north of that shown on the plans and higher than the proposed finished surface. The actual location is having an immediate and extensive negative impact upon the contruction schedule, in that work had to be halted until approximately 600+ feet of watermain could be relocated. It is the City's policy to require utilities to relocate, at their expense, their facilities when they interfer with City street improvements within existing public right -of -way. The district's position, at that time was they would not accept any responsibility for the relocation until further studies were made. In order to not delay the progress until some agreement could be reached, City staff issued a Contract Change Order to Lowy Development to relocate the watermain. The existing watermain could not be lowered due to its deteriorated state. Therefore, a new watermain was installed several feet line a further south and well below any future improvements. The old li hd to be removed and disposed of. This change exceeded the contract contingency amount, and although it is not necessary for Council to approve the Contract Change Order, it is necessary that Council authorize the additional expenditure of funds. L, 7 Ll The City has received the total cost of the change and has invoiced the District for the full amount. At this time, City staff does not know how the District will respond. Copies of the Contract Memorandum and Contract Change Order are attached. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize additional funds to be transfered into Account Number 22- 4631 -8050 "Baseline, Hermosa to Haven" in the amount of $16,500.00 to provide for emergency relocation of 8 inch watermain per attached Contract Change Order and Memorandum. Resp,ecfully subm)tted, LBH:DB:ko Attachments • • r] • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO \GA MEMORANDUM Date: 9/14/84 Project; Tract 11350 Hermosa & Base Line Contract No. 22- 4637 -8050 TO: Resident Engineer, Monte Prescher FROM: Asst. Res. Engr., Dave Blevins COCA si0 - � c 2 = -1977 CCO No. 1 Rev. No. _ Sup. No._ Act. No, 22 -4637 -8050 $ DECR. S 16,500.00 INCR. $ Cont. Bal. THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR: Emergency Replacement of existing 8" water main in Base Line East of Hermosa. Existing 8" main line, being uncovered during construction, was not accurately plotted on plans nor reported by Cucamonga County Water District as existing within the roadway. Existing main line was above the designed new profile of Base Line Road, New replacement 8" main line to be installed below designed new finish surface of Base Line and 20 feet South of existing 8" main per Cucamonga County Water District Standards. This change will exceed the total contact contingency balance by $5,132.00, therefore, it is recommended additional funds be sought from City Council to cover this contingency. CCO DISCUSSED WITH; ESTIMATE This CCO OF COST Total to date 1) City Engr, Lloyd Hobbs Items $ $ 2) Other Chuck Bergson Force Account $ib-5b0.M— $�3 3) Other Lowy Dev. /C.P,Con. Adjustments $ $ Prior Appr, By:: Llo Hobbs Date: TOTAL S 16,500,00 $ 16,500.00 C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M 0 N G A CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 CONTRACT. N0. 22- 4637 -8050 . PROJECT: Tract 11350 SHEET 1 Of 1 SHEETS TO: Lowv DevPlnnmonh or do the following described work not included in the plans and�� specifications picas ono On this contra '.S CHANGE ORDER IS NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL APPROVED BY EE ENGINEER. Uescription of ''1 1: to be done, estimate of g''I ties, and prices to be paid. Segregate between nal additional at contract price, agreed price and force account. Unless otherwise stated, rates for rental of equiprlent cover only such time and equiprent is actually used and no allowance will be made for idle tine. 1. Estimate of Increase at Force Account a. Remove and dispose of existng 3" water main in Base Line Road and place new 8" water main below new designed finish surface profile of Base Line, 30 feet RT of centerline STA 14 +50 of Base Line to 30 feet RT of centerline STA 20 +52 of Base Line , per Cucamonga County Water District Standards. Payment to be at Force Account per Section 3 (Changes in Work) of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, 1982 Edition. Estimate of Increase at Force Account = $16,500.00 • Estimated Cost: Decrease $ or Increase $ 16,500.00 By reason of this order the time of crnpletion wi I I be adjusted as follows; Submitted: Asst. Res. Engr, by: Date: Approved: Resident Resident Engineer by:�,�� 9 Date:= hereby agree. If this - _ .M. — w `�° —1w vr'posea ano all materials, except as otherwise be notedaaboveWiaand�vr� all eservices furnish for the work above s pertain all the necessary pacified, and will accept as full 'payment therefor the prices shorn above. Accepted, Date Contractor By: Title If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order,his attention is directed to the requiramnts of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified. •C.P. Construction Co., Inc. SEWER P.O. Boa 1206 0 ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91752 PHONE, 1YATEw „ne LOrcvacs ..c No 1:+735 714 /991.1091 August 2Sth, 1984 Engineering Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Claifornia 91730 AM% City Engineer Dear Sir: This is a Bid Proposal for installation of the now S" water main in Baseline east of Hermosa: a. Install approximately 550 L.F. of 8" pipe 2 $ 24.00 per foot. b. Construct two water services, including connecting to the existing service lines for two houses currently served by the line to be abandoned. c. Total cast not to e -ceed $15,000.00. • If you desire any additional information please call me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely yours, C.P. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. By '=z7" m�TL 0 is BACKGROUND In order to service the proposed restroom building at Hear Gulch Park, a sewer easement across property owned by the Central School District at Bear Gulch Elementary School is required to connect to the nearest sewer line, located in Konocti Street (see attached map.) The proposed sewer line alignment from the park to the point of connection in Konocti Street requires that the sewer line be constructed underneath a buried Southern California Edison electrical line which supplies electricity to the elementary school. The District has indicated a willingness to grant the required sewer easement to the City provided that the City enters the attached agreement. This agreement provides that should the City's sewer line installation affect the electrical line or other pertinent lines in the area, the City shall pay for necessary costs for relocation of the lines without cost to the District. This is strictly a precautionary measure requested by the School District and should pose no problem to either the City's or the District's future development in the area. In addition to the agreement, an easement document for the sewer easement is also attached. With the approval of the agreement, the City Engineer will accept the easement document. That the City Council: 1. Enter into the attached aqreement with the Central School District, and 2. Instruct the City Engineer to accept the sewer easement document. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM �uGMO� �- Date: To: September 28, 1984 City Council 09d city Manager O s — !n 19i] From: Dick , ark Project Coordinator Subject: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR A SEWER EASEMENT TO SERVE BEAR GULCH PARK is BACKGROUND In order to service the proposed restroom building at Hear Gulch Park, a sewer easement across property owned by the Central School District at Bear Gulch Elementary School is required to connect to the nearest sewer line, located in Konocti Street (see attached map.) The proposed sewer line alignment from the park to the point of connection in Konocti Street requires that the sewer line be constructed underneath a buried Southern California Edison electrical line which supplies electricity to the elementary school. The District has indicated a willingness to grant the required sewer easement to the City provided that the City enters the attached agreement. This agreement provides that should the City's sewer line installation affect the electrical line or other pertinent lines in the area, the City shall pay for necessary costs for relocation of the lines without cost to the District. This is strictly a precautionary measure requested by the School District and should pose no problem to either the City's or the District's future development in the area. In addition to the agreement, an easement document for the sewer easement is also attached. With the approval of the agreement, the City Engineer will accept the easement document. That the City Council: 1. Enter into the attached aqreement with the Central School District, and 2. Instruct the City Engineer to accept the sewer easement document. BE/.vd A A"7;lLW OF COTS •` CUCAMOt/6A V/n/EYAeC T.EAC7,A -T REG'Ct20Ep /.V GOOK PO FAGE44Y .e�OR05 OF'$AN BEQjYA,QLYNO. COUNT STATE' - OF GAC /F. r... ,. Are O.B G 54 / /.EB7Lf r o.a. asst ee . as s'r 57 A f: c wrsrL..lit•OF _ ea snv6 i.`. 8Ei1cR ' aK/ 'TNl wfST 329 "� , I,r Gu� Pane, Of TiVFEAST ii SD /i!T LOT Pl O,tAOSQ�+Je 'T" ^ ►, Amd /I POw ,fir �f 3 G SNQ /GA7js' p1p /!A! /pt/ pf GS6{/iN7 TO Ti✓! e., r), OF' . R.4Ul.{t0 CuCM74�J.f� FOC sne«T /.80A0 i!/,libsCS� ANO ' y WHEREF I The Central School District, its successor and assigns (hereinafter "District "), has agreed to grant to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal oorporatio (hereinafter "City ") an easement and right of way for the installation and operation of sewer lines, such easement to run over, under, across and through that portion of District's property described in the Grant of Easement, which is attached hereto and expressly made a part hereof (hereinafter "easement ") . WHEREFORE, the parties hereto acknowledge that by virtue of the above Grant of Easement by District to City, District, as a result of the installation of City sewer lines in the easement area, may be required by Southern California Edison, by Cucamonga County Water District, or by any other utility eampany, to relocate any or all of the conduits, cables, electrical or communication facilities, sewer or water lines, telephone lines or conduits installed by District in the easement area. WHEREFORE, the parties hereto acknowledge that further development or (redevelopment by District may be necessary in the easement area for the installation of storm drains, electrical conduits, water or sewer lines because of the expansion of facilities on District property at Bear Gulch School. NOW nEREFDRE, the parties agree: That in consideration of District's grant of easement to City, City agrees that should it became necessary at same time in the futur* as a result of District's reasonable development or redevelopment of the easement area, or as a result of City's installation of sewer lines in the easement area, to relocate Southern California Edison's or associated ompany's conduits, cables, or other electrical or communication facilities which are located upon the easement area, or to relocate water or sewer lines installed and owned by District which are located upon the easement area, then the City shall pay all necessary costs of such relocation. Executed this _ day of , 1984. Cr1Y OF RANCHO 0J AMONGA, a municipal corporation Jon D. Mikels, Mayor Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk J CENTRAL SCHOOL DISSTRICr Andrew E. Carlmark, Director - NoI . • BEAR GULCH SCHOOL aoogwNO MouoTen SY City of Rancho Cucamonp "EN REWAND YML TO City of Rancho Cucamonga P,O. Boa 80'7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SMC! alDYf THIS LINE FOR a1C011NaY USE EASEMENT ^ n -al < hoa• ]t,�•_<L 94i] Foot' +' " 91 vd Rancno_,�c ]noy-d. :]'''r ^'] 3:'__ _ GRANT(S) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation. an EASEMENT for EdE >. '745 "oUC":'V c':R ?CS-3 m, uver and UDOn that certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. County of San Bcr.,aMtno, State of California, Desnbed as Follows: -Tat "It 'i_� of -It 3, is 3e, :']t oa s.n1' n t's': - ,r .• „�� / { i is •'ca -d =1 'eio 3a:< caye 44. ':]r:S ;).• ..•i'.0 ^')i. >t:" :, .. ill 1. ):s— .� n.. - ' it `lo-tnesst :):-^^ • s. s7" _s. :3, • !: i3'1 It 30.'J0'ee.,.._ ^CE Aest ] I -- ',t / { i Dated— GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT EGG: 3':pv:`GEV7E.,: CORPORATE ACKNOWLEOGMENT y�vr"r "+ra•> .10�4_� no a p.a. ................ ................. I....... i. " "! ... ..... ... . P r , LJ 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 3, 1984 TO: City Manager and City Council FROM: Robert A. Rizzo Assistant to City Manager SUBJECT: Amendment to Salary Resolution No. 84 -190 During the 1984 -85 budget process the following three full -time positions were approved, however were not included on the adopted Salary Resolution (No. 84 -190): a) Senior Redevelopment Analyst, b) Grading Specialist, and c) Engineerng Aide. The attached Resolution No. 84 -190A (if adopted) would recognize the above - mentioned budget approved positions. If you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact me. RECOMMENDATIONS Approve amendment to Salary Resolution No. 84 -190 to recognize three additional 1984 -85 budget authorized full -time positons. RAR:mk RESOLUTION NO. 84 -190A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE SALARY RESOLUTION NO. 84 -190. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby amends Resolution No. 84 -190 as follows: SECTION 1: Salary Ranges ADDITION OF ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES (Monthly Amounts) ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk E 7 Jon D. Mikels, Mayor Control Class Minimum Point Maximum Code Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount 21XX Engineering 2101 Engineering Aide 247 ' 1,187 277 1,378 28T 1,449 23XX Inspection . 2332 Grading Specialist 347 1,954 377 2,270 387 2,386 24XX Development Administration 2450 Sr. Redevelopment Analyst. 382 2,327 412 2,702 422 2,841 + Denotes Management /Professional Classes PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this a day of 1: 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk E 7 Jon D. Mikels, Mayor /�TTVnV D A XTOUn OT T' A%ffnXYPA STAFF REPORT�� V u October 3, 1984 1977 TO: City Manager and City Council FROM: Robert A. Rizzo Assistant to City Manager SUBJECT: CATV Matters Regarding Extention of Service Within Rancho Cucamonga As directed by the City Council, staff has held its initial meetings with the four cable television (CATV) companies providing service in Rancho Cucamonga. Each of the four expressed an interest in expanding their operations. Although, only two companies (Alta Loma and DCA) indicated they were ready to commence negotiations. The latter two CATV companies - Group W, wished to conduct some engineering studies and then consider discussing their intentions. Acton CATV brought in one group who was about to purchase their Rancho Cucamonga holdings, however, since then that buyer has withdrawn. Moreover, in the past week Acton has mentioned to the City they have another potential buyer, but the City has not received any request for a transfer of their franchise. The next step in this process appears to first met with those CATV companies who have indicated they are willing to proceed. At that time, we would begin discussing and reviewing each of the companies service program proposals, and returning to City Council for input and direction. Staff is requesting authorization from the City Council to begin CATV negotiations in a refranchising mode with the companies willing to proceed. RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to commence negotiations regarding CATV service program proposals with the companies presently operating in Rancho Cucamonga. RAR:mk rY 0 U 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c�CA^fo STAFF REPORT,. �T v ? DATE: October 3, 1984 197% TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Linda D. Daniels, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF CONDITION NUMBER 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 84 -92 APPIM ING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84- 2 - BARMAKIAN - The deve opment of an industrial complex totaling 23,000 sq. ft. on 8 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5), located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Center Avenue - APN 209 - 261 -26. SUMMARY The Planning Commission, at their meeting of August 22, previewed and discussed the above described project. During the staff presentation and discussion it was indicated that the applicant was proposing to paint the building except for those areas proposed to be sandblasted or use fluted concrete. The Design Review Committee, at their meeting of July 31, 1984 stated that a textured surface was more appropriate than a painted surface for this style and type of clustered multi- tenant project in order to demonstrate a high office professional image. In response to this, the Commission agreed with the Design Review Committee's intent that texturing be added to the building which would replace the proposed painted areas. In the Commission's action, Condition Number 3 was added which required the proposed painted surfaces to be replaced with a sandblasted texture, except where the fluted block was proposed. Attached for your review and consideration are the Planning Commission staff report of August 22, 1984 and the Design Review Committee Action Agenda of July 31, 1984. Also attached are building elevation exhibits which identify the areas where the applicant is proposing to use the fluted concrete, the sandblasted concrete and the painted concrete. r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 84 -32 - Barmakian October 10, 1984 Page 2 • RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of Development Review -84 -32 based upon the findings and facts contained within the Resolution approved August 22, 1984. Res ctfuI s bmitted, r Vez ns Attachments: Appeal Letter Planning Commission Staff Report - August 22, 1984 Planning Commission Resolution of Approval - August 22, 1984 Planning Commission Minutes - August 22, 1984 Design Review Committee Action Agenda - July 31, 1984 Exhibit "A" - Building Elevations • • - .o T1-e BARMAKIAN August 29, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite "C" P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk RE: Environmental Assessment and Development Review 84- 32- Barmakian Dear Ms. Authelet: We are hereby requesting an appeal of an added condition to DR 84 -32 Planning Commission Meeting of August 22, 1984 (item Q). This condition regards the requirement to sandblast the exterior elevations of all buildings in lieu of a painted facade as requested. . There are several reasons for our concern over this matter; 1)We feel that sandblasting the entire facade in addition to the sandblasted- fluted areas we have proposed would be an estheticaly inferior solution. 2)The additional cost of sandblasting the entire wall area of all six buildings would nut the project into a questionable economic position. The additional cost will translate into an increased rent scale which will result in an uncompetitive product for today's market conditions. We feel, and the Commission agrees, that our project is well planned and exceeds all requirements of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan. As noted in the I.S.P. part 3 page 33, projects should be "compatible with surrounding land use and architecture... and the best architectural traditions of Southern California." In our professional opinion our project, as proposed, complies with this stated goal and in fact exceeds the established standards in Subarea S. As we indicated to both staff and the commission, we are totally willing to cooperate with them in the selection of a color palette 19 which will be satisfying to all concerned. • Ms. Beverly Authelet page 2 We would appreciate an opportunity to present additional information and participate in a more expansive discussion regarding our position. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention and cooperation regarding our appeal. TH V14Cotial PANY eAIA Vice - President, Architecture cc: Tony Albany, Western Systems Financial Corporation William Keller, Keller Construction Company, Inc. • • r, U U c c nrmv nti• n n nrnvn nr,n n nenwrn n STAFF REPORT DATE: August 22, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Linda Daniels, Associate Planner 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -32 - BARMAKIAN - The development of an industrial complex tots i123,000 square feet on 8 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5), located at the northwest corner of Center Avenue and 6th Street - APN 209- 261 -26. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan and architectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of a 123,000 sq. ft. industrial /manufacturing complex. C. Location: The northwest corner of Center Avenue and 6th Street. D. Parcel Size: 8.04 acres. E. Existin Zonin : Industrial Area Specific Plan, General Industria /Rail Served Category (Subarea 5). F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin : ort - ac ant, n ustria pecific Plan (Subarea 5). South - Vacant, Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 6). East - Vacant, Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 5). West - Deer Creek Flood Control Channel and Vacant, Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 5). M. General Plan 0esi nations: Project Site - General Industrial/Rail Served. North - General Industrial /Rail Served. South - Industrial Park. East - General Industrial /Rail Served. West - General Industrial /Rail Served. ITEM Q PLANNING COMMISSIO' STAFF Environmental Assessment August 22, 1984 Page 2 REPORT and OR 84 -32 - Barmakian I. Site Characteristics: The property is currently vacant and presently slopes in a southeasterly direction. Vegetation is limited to an old grape vineyard and indigenous grasses and weeds. The improved Deer Creek Flood Control Channel borders the subject site on the west. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project is designed as an industrial /manufacturing complex with each building expected to have a different user. The exterior materials include the use of tilt -up concrete panels which will maintain a natural grey color. Around the window areas along 6th Street and at each building entrance fluted concrete and sandblasted concrete textures will be used. Each building entrance will have a reveal of approximately six to eight inches in width. Each entrance reveal will be painted a different color in order to establish building identity. Access to the site shall be provided from Center Avenue and a public cul -de -sac leading from 6th Street. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project and recommended several design and landscaping changes which the applicant has addressed. These addressed changes include such things as (1) the addition of fluted and sandblasted concrete at the building entrances and window areas, (2) the extension of the landscape area at the corner of 6th Street and Center Avenue so that it wraps around the main building entrance, (3) the provision of landscape areas adjacent to the buildings, (4) the screening of loading areas, and (5) the natural grey be exposed on the building facade rather than painted. The Design Review Committee also requested the applicant to provide three to five foot landscaped area an the west, between the proposed buildings and the property line, in order to enhance the buildings adjacent to the proposed Regional equestrian trail. This is possible with the present site plan design. The Committee also commented on the colors proposed for the buildings. They preferred the concrete to remain a natural grey color and that the accent colors carry out low -key or muted tones. Suggestions as to appropriate types of colors were steel blue, rust, navy blue, forest green and dark browns or tan. The applicant has chosen to use some of these colors in addition to various shades of orange and purple. A condition requiring a more appropriate choice of colors is provided for your consideration. �O • CJ • PLANNING COMMISSIOr ,TAFF REPORT Environmental Asses..aent and DR 84 -32 - Barmakian August 22, 1984 Page 3 C. Technical Review Committee: The Development Review Committee reviewed the project and determined that with the recommended conditions of approval the project is consistent with applicable standards and ordinances. D. Gradina Commi the ttee: The Grading Committee has also conceptually approved grading plan provided the two —foot swale shown on the north property line is constructed. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial rea A — pe0T1c-7Pfn and the General Plan. The proposed use, building design and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, is in compliance with all applicable City standards. In addition, the project will not be detrimental to • adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for Environmental Review in fh e Daily Report Newspaper. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution and Conditions pertaining to this project. `ctf u ljr—s-ubqi tted, gG:LD:ns Attachments E Exhibit "A" - Location Map & Industrial Specific Plan Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Illustrated Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations (3 sheets) Initial Study - Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions o/ RESOLUTION NO. 84 -92 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -32 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CENTER AVENUE & 6TH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL /RAIL SERVED DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 20th day of July, 1984, a complete application was filed by Andrew Barmakian for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of August, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and • 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and • 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on August 22, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -32 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: That the reveal colors proposed for the entrance of each building be revised to include more subdued colors such as steel blue, rust, dark brown, forest green and tan. A three to five foot landscaped area shall be provided along the west boundary, between the buildings and the property line. • • Resolution r +o. Page 2 t ATTEST s 3. The building face shall be sandblasted except where fluted concrete is proposed. This sandblasted area shall be left in a natural concrete state and shall not be painted. 4. The walls proposed along the property line perimeter and in the interior of the site shall incorporate the fluted concrete in its design. 5. The top band on each building can be either painted or dyed a dark grey color. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 1984. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • I, Ri4k Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of August, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, STOUT, BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 1 J Draft Excerpt - Planning Commission Minutes August 22, 1984 DIRECTOR'S REPORTS Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -32 - BARMAKIAN - The development of an industrial complex totaling 123,000 square feet on 8 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5), located at the northwest corner of Center Avenue and 6th Street - APN 209- 261-26. Linda Daniels, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report and stated that most concerns of the Design Review Committee had been addressed with the exception of the colors proposed for the building. She explained that the Design Review Committee had stated a preference that the concrete remain in the natural grey color; however, the applicant expressed preference to paint the grey surface. Chairman Stout stated that there was one other issue discussed in Design Review relating to the use of fluted concrete block on the connecting walls, which the applicant had agreed to provide. Pete Pitassi, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission stating that he would agree to providing the fluted concrete block on the connecting walls. He stated agreement with the staff report and the Resolution with the • exception of the applicant's desire to paint the non - sandblasted exterior surfaces rather than leave it in its natural concrete state. He advised that this would give the building a more uniform color. Additionally, he advised that the applicant was flexible on the accent colors and would accept the Commission's suggestions. Commissioner Rempel stated that there are two things wrong with painted surfaces; they require more maintenance and at some time will need to be repainted, at which time a different exterior color might be selected. He suggested that if the applicant desired a darker grey, he could add more concrete to the mixture. Chairman Stout stated that he thought the accent colors would be on the fluted concrete but that the flat surfaces would be sandblasted. Mr. Gomez stated that during discussions in Design Review it was determined that fluted concrete would go around the office portions of the building with the remainder to be sanblasted and the color accents would be around the fluted concrete. Additionally, that only the colored reveals would not be sandblasted. ,� Y • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -32 - BARMAKIAN - The development of an industrial complex totaling 123,000 sq. ft. on 8.0 acres of land in Subarea 5, General Industrial /Rail Served, located at the northwest corner of Center Avenue and 6th Street - APN 209- 261 -26. Background The applicant is withdrawing the previous submittal, OR 84 -14, which proposed three warehouse distribution buildings totaling 147,400 sq. ft. The applicant is now proposing to develop an industrial complex which leans more toward office- manufacturing activities. In addition, 6th Street is designated as a Special Boulevard in the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Staff Comments The following are suggested areas of concern for design improvement: 1. A stronger architectural statement is needed at the intersection of 6th Street and Center Avenue. This • statement could be done through a combination of architectural treatment to the building and landscaping. The addition of larger overhangs at the building entrances; a textured building treatment with a contrasting color band, which could also be contrasting to the building wall treatment; the addition of window elements along the elevations facing 6th Street, or incorporating additional elements to help break -up the building plane are a few suggestions to improve the building facade and appearance. 2. The west building elevation located at the southwest corner of the site has not been included in the development package. Since the building is visible from 6th Street an elevation must be provided. 3. The truck /vehicle loading areas should be screened. 4. To help reduce the mass of the buildings along 6th Street, berming directly adjacent to the building should be considered. S. The landscape setback along the public cul -de -sac street is required to be an average of 25 ft. The applicant is proposing the majority of landscaping at 10 feet, with only minor portions at 30 feet; however, some of this will be lost due to a wider street pa•.ament that is required. This will impact the present design layout along the cul -de -sac significantly. Design Review Comments - DR 34- 32 /Barmakian Page 2 • 6. A landscaped area, large enough for trees and bushes, should be provided adjacent to the 6 foot high screen walls by the loading areas for the buildings. 7. The trash enclosures by the two "Type A" buildings along the north property line should be relocated into possibly one of the parking stall locations. By doing this a much larger landscaped area, adjacent to the storage area, can be provided. Design Review Committee Action Members Present: Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout, Rick Gomez Staff Planner: Linda 0. Daniels 1. The immediate corner of 6th Street and Center Avenue must be enhanced aesthetically. This shall be done by bringing the existing landscaped area further north so that it wraps around the entrance to the building and reduces the parking area. 2. An average 25 foot landscaped area must be provided along • the public cul -de -sac street. 3. A textured building material shall be chosen, such as ribbed concrete, to replace the proposed smooth painted surface. 4. The color bands proposed for the buildings shall be limited to not more than one color for each cluster of buildings. The colors shall be revised so that more subdued colors, such as rust, tan or navy blue, are chosen. 5. All loading areas must be screened from public view through a combination of screenwall and /or landscaping. 6. The site shall meet the minimum landscape requirements established by the industrial Area Specific Plan. 7. A special treatment on the buildings facing the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel or a setback for landscaping must be provided due to the Regional trail facility. 8. The screen walls for the parking and loading areas shall be of consistent material and color as the buildings in the development. • Cc �% 0 LiFSn �i' ec3&?t5il arnr��v a snrr s+�� -r. CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAIIOjNCA PLANNING DIVISION iMM r, D¢I.�.,PAL -0 TITLE i'LPIlci%Or dzftt/`gw LQ URIT ' _ SCALE: ---' I Y � �Z aUm Q °�U ❑5 Z(n C NORTI i �s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO \GA PLANNING DIVISION G> c ITE \1:_,09 861^3Z i m� WKZ25 2a.ZE° U Q °°� 0mw UF ¢� j Wcc <QE ¢? (o NOR I 0 TITLE: _4k(*XlW eAft&M4 • EXHIBIT: A. SCALE: Ll r co-aE(E pf*r-o, (b-w6 pmljrw Cdr ♦.y 'li� ILIIi�I' E�X�TiP -10O R E OF W., CITY OF ITEM: D&84 -32 RANCHO CLCANIOiNGA TITLE: -?Y-hATm' atic>w► PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: !A2— SCALE A-W NORTH I Z� Wq U� °aV 9n� Ci ¢G{/ffTTl• ILIIi�I' E�X�TiP -10O R E OF W., CITY OF ITEM: D&84 -32 RANCHO CLCANIOiNGA TITLE: -?Y-hATm' atic>w► PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: !A2— SCALE A-W NORTH I Z� Wq U� °aV • ORDINANCE NO. 233 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16, SECTION 1.401.11.2 OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE, IN RELATION TO TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSIONS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The following section is hereby added to Section 1.401.2, Tentative Map Time Extensions, to read as follows: Section 1.401.11.2(g) Findings The Commission may not grant a time extension for an approved tentative map unless it can make all of the following findings; The previously approved tentative map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, Specific Plans, ordinances, plans, codes and policies; and, 2. The extension of the tentative map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plans, ordinances, plans, codes and policies; and, 3. The extension of the tentative map is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and 4. The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. Unless all of the above findings are made by the Commission, the requested extension shall be denied. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 1984. 17/ ORDINANCE NO. 234 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17, SECTIONS 17.02.110, 17.08.090, 17.08.050, AND 17.02.020 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, I+ RELATION TO TIME EXTENSIONS, PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION, TRANSITION OF DENSITY, NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY (SITE PLAN DESIGN, LANDSCAPING, OPEN SPACE, GRADING AND ARCHITECTURE), AND PRESERVATION OF VIEWSHED. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The following sections are hereby added to Section 17.02.110 -- Public Hearings and Notification, to read as follows: A. General Apartments and /or multi - family projects of four (4) units or more. D. Notice of Hearing 4. Supplemental Notice Requirements. Additional public notification beyond the standard 300 -foot boundary shall be • required for a development related project as determined by the City Planner in any one of the following circumstances: (1) The proposed development is a residential infill project with a higher intensity land use than that of the exising neighborhood; or, (2) The proposed residential infill project requires a General Plan land use amendment; or, (3) The proposed residential infill project requires an EIR; or, (4) As determined to be necessary and desirable by the City Planner based on the nature of the proposed project. In determining the boundaries of the expanded notification area, the following criteria shall be used: (1) The expanded area may be directly affected by the proposed project due to proposed or established circulation and drainage patterns, or access, view, grading, or other similar considerations; or (2) The expanded area is an integral part of the affected is neighborhood or subdivision. ',7 If it is determined upon initial submittal that supplemental • notification is necessary, the applicant shall be notified, within 30 days as part of the City's Notice of Complete Application, of expanded notification area to be included in the mailings, and shall be required to submit three (3) sets of gummed address labels based on the latest equalized tax assessors rolls for the expanded area. The application shall not be deemed complete until the labels have been submitted. SECTION 2: The following sections are hereby added to Section 17.02.110 C - Notice of Filing, to read as follows: 1. Standard Notice Requirement. At such time as an application for a project which requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission is deemed complete for processing, the City Planner shall cause notices to be posted conspicuously on the project site not more than 300 feet apart along project perimeter fronting on improved public streets. Each notice shall contain a general description of the project and a copy of any proposed subdivision map or site plan. Such notices shall have the following title in lettering not less than one (1) inch in height: "NOTICE OF FILING ". 2. Supplemental Notice Requirements. (a) Applicability: In addition to standard requirements, large -foot by 8 -foot sign or signs shall be required • to be posted at the project site for development related projects in any one of the following circumstances: (1) The proposed development is an infill project with a higher intensity land use than that of the existing neighborhood; or, (2) The proposed infill project requires a General Plan land use amendment; or, (3) The proposed infill project requires an EIR; or, (4) As determined to be necessary and desirable by the City Planner based on the nature of the proposed project. For large projects, the City Planner may determine that more than one sign is necessary. The purpose of the supplemental large sign notice requirement is to notify the community and the neighbors in the affected area early in the review process, allowing the applicant and the City the benefit of citizens' comments during the initial stages of project review. C1 %3 If it is determined upon initial submittal that a large, 4 -foot • by 8 -foot notification sign(s) is necessary, the applicant shall be notified of required sign bonding fees and sign permit filing requirements within 30 days as part of the City's Notice of Complete Application. A 8500 cash deposit is required to ensure compliance with the supplemental notification requirements including maintenance and removal of the large notification sign. The project application shall not be deemed complete until the large sign is installed and required cash deposit made. (b) Siqn Criteria /Maintenance. In order to implement the large signs as an effective form of public notification, the following rules and standards shall apply: (1) Sign Size and_Specifications. All large sign(s) shall e four feet by eight feet (4'% 8') in size and be constructed to the specifications of Figure 1. The specific project information text on the sign shall be provided by the Planning Division. (2) Location and Installation Standards. All large sign(s) shall be installed according to the specifications of Figure 2. The location for the signs) on the project site shall be determined by the City Planner. (3) Timing. All large notification sign(s) shall be installed by the applicant at the project site in accordance with the above criteria. Once the project application is deemed complete and all notification sign(s) installed per City standards, the project will be scheduled for Design and Development Review Committee meetings. (4) Si n Removal and Maintenance. All large sign(s) must be kept adequate y maintained and remain in place until the final decision on the application has been made or the application is withdrawn. All large sign(s) shall be removed by the applicant within fourteen (14) days of the final decision or date of withdrawal. Failure to remove the sign within the prescribed period may result in forfeiture of the cash deposit and removal of the sign by the City. SECTION 3: Language is hereby added to Section 17.08.090 - General Design Guidelines, to read as follows: Section 17.08.090 General Design Guidelines /'1 ti Site Plan Design 1. Existing Site Conditions. Natural features must be used to • an advantage as design elements; such as mature vegetation, landforms, drainage courses, grading, rock outcroppings and views. Conversely, undesirable site figures must be minimized through proper site planning and building orientation. S. Landsca in /0 en Space. Landscaping and open spaces must be designed as an integral part of project design and enhance the building design, enhance public views and spaces and provide buffers and transitions where needed, with emphasis on complementing grading and softening slope banks. Landscaping must provide for solar access and shade to facilitate energy conservation. 9. Grading. Development should relate to the natural surroundings and minimize grading by following the natural contours as much as possible. Graded slopes should be rounded and contoured to blend with the existing terrain. Split -level pads, built -up foundations, stepped footings, etc., can be used in areas of moderate to steep gradient. Above all, grading shall be designed to complement the project's orientation, scale, height, design and transitions with surrounding areas. D. Building Design • 2. Architecture. The architecture must consider compatibility with surrounding character, including harmonious building style, form, size, color, material and roof line. Individual dwelling units should be distinguishable from one another and have separate entrances. Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, projection or recession of stories, balconies, reveals, and awning contribute to a building's character while aiding in climate control. Further, changes in the roof level or planes provide architectural interest. The architectural concept should also complement the grading and topography of the site. In particular, Low - Medium density residential development should be designed with upgraded architecture through increased delineation of surface treatment and architectural details. SECTION 4: The following language is hereby added to Section 17.08.050 - Absolute Policies, to read as follows: • Section 17.08.050 Absolute Policies B. Nei hborhood Com at ibilit The project is compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and neighborhood relative to architectural design; scale, bulk, density and unit size; identity and neighborhood character; building orientation and setback; grading; and visual integrity. SECTION 5: The following language is hereby added to Section 17.08.090 D - Building Design, to read as follows: Section 17.08.090 D Building Design Scale. The mass and scale of the building must be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street locations and surrounding developments. Setbacks and overall heights should provide an element of openness and human scale. All attached projects adjacent to existing one -story single family developments shall be one story, unless the impact of two -story structures on the existing one -story neighborhood is fully mitigated with emphasis on privacy, views, and general compatibility. Multiple family product type (i.e., apartment, condominium, townhouse) is discouraged immediately adjacent to lower density single family areas. • SECTION 6: The City Council finds that Development Code Amendment 84 -03 is an implementation of the General Plan goals and policies and that the General Plan Environmental Impact Report adequately covers any potential significant adverse impacts. Further, the City Council finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. Specifically, the City Council. is A. No substantial changes are proposed in any goals or policies which would require major revisions to the EIR. B. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken. C. No new information on the project has become available. SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 1984. i� 1NOTICE OF FILING TFile No.: Tract 198763° =PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OFr4 2 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES x Applicant: Public Hearing TT Ace Developers L i- For Information Contact City of Rancho Cucamonga PLANNING DIVISION 9320 Baseline Rd. (714) 989 -1851 • 1 FIGURE 1 DESIGN OF LARGE NOTIFICATION SIGN • • 0 • ORDINANCE NO. 236 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING THAT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHALL BE HELD ON THE SAME DAY AS THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION, NAMELY, THE FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE FIRST MONDAY OF NOVEMBER IN EACH EVEN NUMBERED YEAR The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Ordinance is enacted under the authority of Goverment Code Section 36503.5(a). SECTION 2: The general municipal election of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be held on the same day as the statewide general election, namely, on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November in each even numbered year. SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall apply to general municipal elections held in 1986 and subsequent years, provided, however, that nothing in this Ordinance shall limit or otherwise effect the authority of the City Council to change the day of the general municipal election in the manner permitted by • Goverment Code Section 36503.5 or any other relevant statute. SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall become operative upon the approval of the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors. r� SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of September, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk 7B Jon D. Mikels, Mayor M E M O R A N D U M TO: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk FROM: Robert E. Dougherty,-City Attorney DATE: September 27, 1984 RE: Ambulance Ordinance Inasmuch as the draft ambulance ordinance is apparently on your word processor, I have made suggested changes by either pen and ink corrections on the ordinance which appeared in the last agenda packet, by additional or substitute provisions which are referred to in this memo, or by a combination of both. Please revise Ordinance No. 230 accordingly for the October 3, • 1984 agenda. ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS: 4.1.01(a) Ambulance. The term "ambulance" means a vehicle specially constructed, modified or equipped, and used for the purpose of transporting sick, injured, convalescent, infirm or otherwise in- capacitated persons and which is equipped with emergency signaling devices (such as red light and siren) or which is subject to licens- ing by the California Highway Patrol as an ambulance. 4.1.06(b). The Council may order the denial dal of a permit if it finds: (1) That the application is not in the form and does not contain the information required by the provisions of this chap- ter; 49 (2) That the vehicles described in the application are inadequate or unsafe for the purposes for which they are to be used; -1- 74 ORDINANCE NO. 230 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL COOE PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF AMBULANCES. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1; The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as fo oil5 "Chapter 1. Ambulances "Sec. 4.1.01. Oefinitions. Unless otherwise stated, words and terms are defined as follows: (a) AMBULANCE. The term 'ambulance' means any vehicle specially constructed, modified or equipped, and used for the purpose of transporting sick, injured, convalescent, infirm or otherwise incapacitated persons and which is equipped with emergency signaling devices (such as red light and siren) or which Is subject to licensing by he California Highway Patrol as an ambulance. (b) AMBULANCE SERVICE OPERATOR. The term 'ambulance service operator' means any person who owns or operates one or more ambulances. (c) COUNCIL The term 'Council' means the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. is (d) CLASS OF SERVICE. The term 'Class of Service' means the level or levels of complexity of field emergency medical services and will be specified as basic life support provided by Emergency Medical Technician (EMT -IA) personnel conforming to California Health and Safety Code, Section 1780 (f), full advanced life support provided by California licensed physician or by paramedics and mobile Intensive care nurses certified by the County Health Officer under California Health and Safety Code, Section 1481. (e) CITY. The term 'City' means the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. (f) CITY MANAGER. The term 'City Manager' means the City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or his designee. (g) COUNTY. The term 'County' means the County of San Bernardino, California. (h) COUNTY HEALTH OFFICE°.. The term 'County Health Officer' means that person designated as such by the County of San Bernardino. (i) EMERGENCY CALL. The term 'Emergency Call' Is a request for the dispatch of an ambulance to transport or provide other assistance for a person who apparently has a sudden or unforeseen need of medical attention. (j) EMERGENCY SERVICE. The term 'Emergency Service' means the functions performed In response to an emergency call. (k) PATIENT. The term 'Patient' means a sick, injured, wounded, invalid, expectant mother, convalescent, or otherwise incapacitated person. (1) PERSON. The term 'Person' includes any individual partnership, firm, corporation, association, governmental agency or other group or combination acting as a unit. Ordinance No. 230 Page 2 (m) BASIC LIFE SUPPORT (BLS) AMBULANCE. The term 'BLS • Ambulance' means an ambulance which has equipment and supplies as specified by Title 13, California Administrative Code. (n) ADVANCFD LIFE SUPPORT (ALS) OR LIMITED ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT (LALS) AMBULANCE. The term 'ALS or LALS Ambulance' means an ambulance which has additional equipment and supplies as specified by the County Health Officer. (o) MOBILE INTENSIVE CARE (MIC) PARAMEDIC. The term 'MIC Paramedic' means a person specially trained in the provision of emergency, cardiac and noncardiac care appropriately certified by the County Health Officer, (p) MOBILE INTENSIVE CARE (MIC) NURSE. The term 'MIC nurse' means a nurse who has been certified by the County Health Officer as qualified in the provision of emergency cardiac and noncardiac care in the issuance of emergency instructions to MIC paramedics. (q) PERMITTEE. The term 'Permittee' means any person who possesses a current City permit to act as an ambulance service operator. (r) CODE 3. The term 'Code 3' means the period when an ambulance is traveling to or from a patient pick -up point using red lights and /or sirens and is traveling in such a manner as to reach its destination in the shortest possible time. -Sec. 4.1.02, Permits: Required. It shall be unlawful for any person, either as owner, employee or otherwise, to operate an ambulance, or to engage in business as an • ambulance service operator, upon the streets or any public way or place in the City except in conformance with a valid City permit to operate an ambulance service. (a) EXCEPTIONS. The equipment and personnel standards specified In this chapter apply to all ambulance agencies; however, the licensing and permit requirements shall not apply to: (1) Publicly owned ambulances; or, (2) Vehicles operated as ambulances at the request of local authorities during any 'state of war emergency,' duly proclaimed 'state of emmrgency' or 'local emergency,' as defined in the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 of Division I of Title 2 of the Government Code), as amended, "Sec, 4,1.03, Permit Fees. Permit fees shall be those which are, from time to time, set by the Council. All permits shalt be issued to expire on June 30 of each year. -Sec. 4.1.04, Application for a Permit or Renewal of a Permit. (a) PROCEDURE AND INFORMATION REQUIRED. Prerequisites to the issuance of a permit or renewal of a permit for an applicant shall include the filing with the City Manager an application In writing on a form to be furnished by the City Manager, which shall provide the following minimum information: (I) Name and description of applicant. • 1 i Ordinance No. 230 Page 3 . (2) Business address and residence address of any individual applicant. (3) The name under which the ambulance service will do business. (a) If a corporation, a Joint venture, a partnership or limited partnership, the names of all partners, or the names of corporate officers, their residence addresses and their percentage of Participation in the business. (5) A verification that the applicant is equipped to and will provide ALS paramedic service at all times in the City, (6) A statement in renewal applications that the applicant owns or has under his control required equipment to adequately conduct an ambulance Service in the City, which meets the requirements established by the California Vehicle Code, and that the applicant owns or has access to suitable and safe facilities for maintaining his ambulance service in a clean and sanitary condition. When an initial application is submitted, a Statement that the applicant will own or will have under his control required equipment to adequately conduct an ambulance service in the City, which meets the requirements established by the California Vehicle Code and that the applicant will own or will have access to suitable and safe facilities for maintaining his ambulance service in a clean and sanitary condition. Both initial and renewal applications must contain a Statement that the applicant will maintain (station) at least one ALS equipped ambulance within the geographical boundaries of the City. Additionally, the applicant must establish to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager that the applicant has adequate capability to 'back up' or augment such ALS equipped ambulance if it is not immediately available to respond to a call • therefor. (7) A list for renewal applications amended as required during the year for any changed, substituted, loaned or leased vehicles, giving a complete description of each ambulance vehicle operated by the applicant, covering a list of the internal equipment carried by each ambulance, Including the patient capacity thereof, and a copy of the most recent Ambulance Inspection Report issued by the California Highway Patrol for each vehicle. When an initial application is Submitted, a list, amended as required during the year for any changed, substituted, loaned or leased vehicles, giving a complete description of each ambulance vehicle to be operated by the applicant, covering a list of the internal equipment carried by each ambulance, including the patient capability thereof, and a copy of the most recent Ambulance Inspection Report Issued by the California Highway Patrol for each vehicle shall be provided to the City Manager prior to the start of ambulance operation. (8) An affirmation for renewal applications that each permitted ambulance and Its appurtenances conform to all applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the California Vehicle Code, the California Administrative Code and any other State, County or City applicable directive. When an initial application is submitted, and affirmation that each permitted ambulance and its appurtenances conform to all applicable provisions of this chapter, the California Vehicle Cade, the California Administrative Code, and any other State, County or City applicable directive shall be provided to the City Manager prior to the start of ambulance operations. (9) A statement for renewal applications that the applicant employs sufficient personnel adequately trained and available to deliver emergency ALS paramedic ambulance services of good quality at all times in the City. When an Initial application is submitted, a statement that the applicant will employ sufficient Personnel adquately trained and available to deliver emergency ALS ambulance services of good quality at all times. R Ordinance No. 230 Page 4 (10) A list for renewal applications giving a description • of the level of training for each ambulance employee and a copy of each certificate or license issued by the State and County establishing qualifications of such personnel in ambulance operations. When an initial application is submitted, a list, amended as required during the year for any personnel changes, giving description of the level of training for each ambulance employee and a copy of each certificate or license issued by the State and County establishing qualifications of such personnel in ambulance operations shall be provided to the City Manager prior to start of ambulance operation. (11) A statement, in an initial application, that shows to the satisfaction of the City Manager that the issuance of a permit is in the public interest and there is a need for a permit to be issued, in that there is a requirement for ambulance service which can be legally serviced by the applicant. (12) A statement signed by the applicant that as a condition of the City issuing a permit, applicant agrees to appear and defend all actions against the City arising out of the exercise of said permit, and shall indemnify and save the City, its officers and employees and agents harmless of and from all claims, demands, actions, or causes of actions of every kind and description resulting directly or indirectly, arising out of, or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. "Sec. 4.1.05. Investigation by City Manager. Upon receipt of a completed Initial (non - renewal) application, the City Manager shall conduct an investigation to determine if the applicant meets all requirements of this Ordinance. Upon completion m . of his investigation, the City Manager shall recommend to the Council that a permit be granted or denied. The determination of the Council shall be made after a public hearing upon the qualifications of the applicant, "Sec. 4.1.06. Issuance or Curial of permit, (a) The City Council may order the issuance of a new permit to conduct an ambulance service in the City upon finding that the applicant meets all requirements of this Ordinance. (b) The Council may order the denial of a permit if it finds: (1) That the application Is not in the form and does not contain the information required by the provisions of this chapter; (2) That the vehicles described In the application are inadequate or unsafe for the purposes for which they are to be used; (3) That the color scheme, name, monogram, or insignia to be used upon such vehicles is in conflict with or imitates any color scheme, name, monogram, or Insignia used by any person so a to be misleading or tend to deceive or defraud the public. (c) The Council may order the denial of a permit if the applicant or any partner, officer or director thereof: (1) Was previously the holder of a City permit, which permit was revoked or suspended and the terms or conditions of the suspension have not been fulfilled or corrected, (2) Is committing any act, which, if committed by any • pemmittee, would be grounds for the suspension or revocation of a permit Issued pursuant to this Ordinance. r Ordinance No. 230 Page 5 • (3) Has committed any act involving dishonesty, fraud, or deceit whereby another is injured or where the applicant has benefited. (4) Has acted as an ambulance service operator in the City without possessing a valid permit therefor. (5) Has aided or abetted any person to violate any provision of this chapter or any prior ambulance ordinance. (6) Makes any false or misleading statement upon any application, or during the course of any investigation, required or permitted by this chapter, (c) BONDING OF APPLICANT. Before any permit is issued under the provisions of this Ordinance, the Council shall require the applicant as a condition to the issuance of the permit to post with the City Clerk a cash bond in the sun of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars (125,000.00) or a surety bond in the same amount furnished by a corporation authorized to do business in the State of California, payable to the City. The bond shall be conditioned upon the full and faithful performance by the permittee of his obligations under the applicable provisions of this Ordinance and shall be kept in full farce and effect by the permittee throughout the life of the permit and all renewals thereof. (d) LIABILITY INSURANCE. The permittee shall obtain and keep In force during the term of said permit public liability and bodily insurance issued by a company authorized to do business in the State of California insuring the owner, and also naming the City as an additional insured of such ambulance against loss by reason of injury or damages that may result to persons or property from negligent • operation or defective construction of such ambulance, or from violation of this Ordinance or of any other law of the State of California or of the United States. Said policy shall be in the sum of not less than Four Million Dollars ($4,000,GOO.00) for personal injury to or death of any one person in any single accident; and the limits of each such vehicle shall not be less than Four Million Dollars (54,000,000,00) for damages to or destruction of property in any one accident, Workers' Compensation insurance shall be carried covering all employees of the permittee. Copies o` the policies or certffcates evidencing such policies shall be filed with the City Clerk. All policies shall contain a provision requiring a thirty (30) day notice to be given to the City Clerk prior to cancellation, modification or reduction of limits. "Sec. 4.1.07. Content of Permit. The Permit shall specify the dates of issuance and of expiration, the number of amulance units to be used by the permittee and any special conditions regarding communications, equipment and personnel deemed appropriate by the City Council. "Sec. 4.1.08. Amendment of Permits Upon request by the permittee, the City Manager may amend the conditions specified In a permit if he finds such requested changes to be in substantial compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. Such amendment shall not affect the expiration date of the existing permit, nor shall It authorize a change In ownership from that specified In the original permit. I? S_ Ordinance No. 230 Page 6 "Sec. 4.1.09. Renewal of Permits. • (a) Permits Shall be renewed annually by the City Manager upon application of the permittee, if the permit holder proposes no Substantial change in the content of the permit, and if the City Manager determines that the permit holder has, during the period of the - expiring permit, operated in substantial conformity with the provisions of this Ordinance and the rules and regulations of the City, and that he is capable of continuing operation in conformity with the rules and regulations of the City. (b) Unless good cause can be shorn by the permittee, it shall be a valid basis for non - renewal of a permit if the permittee has not, during the preceding permit period, had a Code 3 response time to at least 95% of its emergency calls of eight (8) minutes or less. Said response time being measured from the time the permittee received the request until the permittee's ambulance actually arrived at the location for which the service was requested. (e) If the renewal application proposes a substantial change in the content of the permit, the application shall be processed as a new application pursuant to sections 4.1.05 and 4.1.06 of this chapter. -Sec. 4.1.10. Suspension and Revocation of Permits. The City Manager shall be empowered to suspend or revoke the permit issued under the provisions of this Chapter to operate an ambulance service, when it has been found after investigation that the permittee or any partner, officer, or director: (a) Violates any section of this chapter or any rules or • regulations that are promulgated by the City which relate to his permit activities. (b) Is convicted of any offense relating to the use, sale, possession, or transportation of narcotics or habit forming drugs. (c) Commits any act involving dishonesty, fraud, or deceit whereby another is injured, or whereby the permittee has benefited, or any act involving moral turpitude. (d) Has misrepresented a material fact in obtaining a permit, or is no longer adhering to the conditions specified in his application. (e) Aids or abets any person wno violates the provisions of this chapter, (f) Fails to make and keep records showing his transactions as a permittee, or falls to have such records available for inspection by the City Manager or his duly authorized representative for a period of not less than three years after completion of any transaction to which the records refer, or refuses to comply with a written request of the City Manager or make such record available for inspection. (g) Accepts an emergency call when either unable or unwilling to provide the requested service or fails to inform the person requesting such service of any delay and faits to obtain the consent of such person before causing an ambulance to respond from a location more distant than the one to which the request was directed. (h) Failure, without adequate .justification, to continuously provide MIC paramedic emergency service for a continuous period of • more than 24 hours. .G G Ordinance No. 230 Page 7 • (i) Fails to notify the Fire Department of a request for emergency ambulance service. (j) Operates an ambulance demoted as a paramedic unit by wording or lettering on the unit without qualified MIL personnel and equipment in the vehicle. (k) During any validation period of not less than thirty (30) days, failure of permittee to respond to 95% of Code 3 calls within eight (B) minutes or less will be sufficient grounds for revocation of permit. -Sec. 4.1.11. Suspension, Conditional Operation, and Temporary ar once. In the event of a change in ownership of any kind or nature any interruption of service of more than twenty -four (24) hours duration, or any substantial change in staffing or equipment of the ambulance service, which causes the ambulance service to be carried out differently than specified in the current operating permit, the permittee shall notify the City Manager immediately in writing, stating the facts of such change. (a) Upon request by the permittee, the City Manager may grant a temporary variance in writing from the Condition specified In the original permit if he finds that such change is in substantial compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. If the City Manager finds that such change is not In substantial compliance with this Ordinance, he may suspend, revoke, or amend the permit by written notice. In all cases when a change of ownership occurs in an ambulance service, an application for a new permit shall be filed • with the City Manager within thirty (30) days. In no Case shall any temporary variance be valid for more than sixty (60) days without written approval of the Council. "Sec. 4.1.12. appeal Procedure If the renewal of a permit is denied by the City Manager or if the City Manager suspends or revokes a permit, the permitee shall be given written notice specifying not only the action taken, but in the event of a suspension or revocation, the effective date thereof, which shall be not less than fifteen (15) days after the date of said notice. Such notification shall be by registered or certified mail. (a) within ten (10) days after the date of such notification, the permittee may request a hearing before the City Manager. Such request most be in writing to the City Clerk. If such request is timely made, the effective date of any denial, suspension or revocation shall be extended until fifteen (15) days following the City Manager's action upon said request. The City Manager may, after suchd hearing, affirm, modify, or set aside the original decision. (b) If, after the hearing provided for above, the City Manager denies the renewal of or suspends or revokes a permit, the permittee shall have the right to demand a hearing by the Council. A request for a hearing shall be made In writing to the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days following the denial, suspension, revocation or non - renewal of the permit. Upon receipt of a written request, the City Clerk shall set the matter for hearing on a date not more than sixty (60) days following receipt of the written request and give notice to the appellant, the City Manager, and any other interested persons who may present evidence, relevant to the decision of the City Manager, within thirty (30) days following the Ordinance No. 230 Page 0 toncluslon of the hearing, the Council shall make findings and issue . its order, whether or not the permit should be issued or the suspension or revocation sustains. (c) During the time available to request an appeal, and at any time before the appeal to the Council shall have became final, the effect of such non - renewal, suspension or revocation shall be stayed, (d) Notwithstanding any other provisions herein contained to the contrary, the City Manager shall be empowered to effect an immediate suspension of a permit without delaying the effective date thereof if he first finds the continued conduct of such permittee is so far removed from compliance with this Chapter or the general welfare of the citizens of the City as to justify such immediate action. (e) Any permittee who has such Immediate suspension action taken against it shall have a hearing scheduled before the City Manager within seven (7) working days of such suspension. "Sec. 4.1.13. Emergency Service Requirements, Each permittee shall provide emergency MIC paramedic ambulance service on a continuous twenty -four (24) hours per day basis. -Sec. 4.1.14. Conformance with Permit Ordinance. No ambulance operator shall provide ambulance service for ambulance calls originating within the City unless he shall first have a valid City permit. "Sec. 4.1.15. Standards for Dispatch. • Each ambulance service receiving an emergency ambulance request shall dispatch an ambulance in compliance with the procedures identified in Title 13, California Administrative Code. If an ambulance is not available for immediate dispatch, the procedures identified in Title 13, California Administrative rode, shall be compiled with. (a) The Fire Department shall be immediately notified of any emergency ambulance request, "Sec. 4.1.16. Ambulance Safety and Emergency Equipment equirements. Ambulances shall be maintained at all times in good mechanical repair and in a clean and sanitary condition. (a) MINIMUM EQUIPMENT. All ambulances shall be equipped with all safety and emergency equipment required for ambulances by the California Vehicle Code and the California Administrative Code and administrative rules of the County Health Officer as the same are now written, or hereafter amended. (b) ALS AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT. In addition to the regular ambulance equipment and supplies, any ALS ambulance shall also be equipped as required by the valid administrative rules of the County Health Officer. (c) MAINTENANCE OF EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES. Dressings, bandaging, instruments and other medical supplies used for • care and treatment of patients will be protected 50 they are sterile when ready for use. If '? Ordinance No. 230 Page 9 "Sec. 4.1.19. Emergency and Disaster Operations. During any 'state of war emergency,' 'state of amergency,' or 'local emergency' as defined in the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code), as amended, each ambulance service operator shall provide equipment, facilities, and personnel as required by the City Manager. Sec. 4.1.20. User Complaint Procedures. Any user or subscriber to an Ambulance service contending that he has been required to pay an excessive charge for service or that he has received unsatisfactory services may file a written complaint with the City Manager setting forth such allegations. The City Manager shall notify the affected permittee of such complaint, and shall investigate the matter to determine the validity of the complaint. If the complaint Is determined to be valid, the City Manager shall take a reasonable and proper action to secure compliance with the conditions of this Ordinance. Y " "Sec. 4.1.17. Ambulance Personnel. Every person who drives an ambulance within the City, while responding to emergency calls, shall comply with the requirements In the California Administrative Code for ambulance drivers. The driver of an Ambulance shall be trained and competent in the proper use of all emergency equipment required by this Ordinance. The driver shall also hold a certificate of at least an EMT -IA unless the Ambulance service operator has been specifically exempted from this requirement by the Council. (a) AMBULANCE ATTENDANT. An Ambulance attendant shall be trained and competent in the proper use of all emergency equipment required by this Ordinance, and shall hold the required certification of at least an EMT -IA. If the vehicle is being used As an AILS Ambulance, at least one attendant shall hold a certificate as an MIC paramedic issued by the Health Officer for ALS Ambulance. (b) ATTENDANT REWIRED. Each Ambulance being operated within the City, in response to an emergency call, shall be staffed by both a driver and attendant. The attendant of an Ambulance responding to _ an emergency call shall occupy the patient Compartment while transporting any person in apparent need of medical attention. An Ambulance driver or ambulance attendant who is a California licensed physician or an MIC nurse certified by the County Health Officer, shall be exempt from the emergency medical training requirement of this section. This section shall not apply during any 'state of emergency' or 'local emergency' as defined in the Government Code of the State of California. • "Sec. 4.1.18. Continuation of Calf. An Ambulance based and properly licensed outside the City but not licensed by the City shall be authorized to transport a patient to or through the City, but Shall not be authorized to transport patients originating In the City. "Sec. 4.1.19. Emergency and Disaster Operations. During any 'state of war emergency,' 'state of amergency,' or 'local emergency' as defined in the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code), as amended, each ambulance service operator shall provide equipment, facilities, and personnel as required by the City Manager. Sec. 4.1.20. User Complaint Procedures. Any user or subscriber to an Ambulance service contending that he has been required to pay an excessive charge for service or that he has received unsatisfactory services may file a written complaint with the City Manager setting forth such allegations. The City Manager shall notify the affected permittee of such complaint, and shall investigate the matter to determine the validity of the complaint. If the complaint Is determined to be valid, the City Manager shall take a reasonable and proper action to secure compliance with the conditions of this Ordinance. Y " ordinance No. 230 Page 10 -Sec. 4,1.21. Enforcement Responsibilities. • (a) The City Manager shall make all necessary and reasonable rules and regulations subject to the approval of the Council covering ambulance service operation, ambulance equipment, ambulance vehicles, ambulance personnel, and for the effective and reasonable administration of this Ordinance. (b) The City Manager shall inspect the records, facilities, vehicles, equipment and methods of operation whenever such inspections are deemed necessary. "Sec. 4.1.22. Excused. Performance No operator shall be deemed to be in violation of its permit if it shall fail to provide, either in whole or in part, the services otherwise required of it if such performance is prevented by any of the following: (a) Acts of God; (b) Labor strikes or disputes; (c) Intervention of any government body; or (d) Any force reasonably beyond the control of the operator. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this airUfnance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared Invalid or unconstitutuional. If for any reasons any Portion of this Ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional, then all other provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall • attesTto tfiie same, and the City Clerk shall cause the Ordinance to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Oail Re or t, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City 0 nt ar o, an circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of _, 1984, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: on D. Mikels, Mayor Beverly A. A4thelet, City Clerk • • I 1 ,11111 nn n n110vn ,1111, nrnw.n STAFF REPORT DATE: October 3, 1984 19 i7 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: RE UFST FOR TAX EXEMPT BOND FINANCING FROM ELITE VELOPM NT SYCAMORE SPRING The City has been requested by Elite Development Company to participate in the issuance of Tax Exempt Bonds to facilitate the construction of 240 apartment units. The project, located on the east side of Archibald, between Base Line and the Pacific Electric Railroad tracks, was originally approved in May of 1981 as a condominium development. The project contains about 11.5 acres of land resulting in a net density of 20.86 dwellings per acre. It consists of a mix of one and two bedroom dwellings arranged around a continuous water element. The attached staff report of May 27, 1981 provides additional details about the project. Phase I of the development, consisting of 64 dwellings is already under construction. However, because of high interest rates, the developer is facing apparent difficulties in marketing the units as condominiums and obtaining financing for the construction of the remainder of the project. Consequently, the developer now intends to market the units as apartments and finance the project under a Tax Exempt Bond available for rental projects. The City is being asked to participate in the bond program. This would involve the adoption by the City Council of an Inducement Resolution, specifying in effect that the use of Tax Exempt Bonds is necessary to induce the creation of affordable rental housing in the community. In return, the developer would be required to make available at least 20% of the units to persons of low and moderate income. Currently, there are two apartment projects financed under the Tax Exempt Construction Bonds in the City; the Don Miguel Apartments on 19th and the Pepperwood Project across from Gemco on Foothill Boulevard. Both of these projects were financed under the County's Rental Construction Bond Program. The City has a participation agreement with the County, which allows the County, at its discretion, to finance City approved apartment projects within the community. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Tax Exempt Bond Financing October 3, 1984 Page 2 LJ ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: There are three basic questions that must be asked when considering this request. First, does the City intend at this point in time to get actively involved in the provision of additional rental housing. Past and current focus of the City's housing programs has been on the reduction of mortgage rates for ownership housing, housing rehabilitation of existing stock, and cooperation with the County and the State in regards to affordable rental housing. The issuance of a tax exempt rental bond would be a first for the community. The second question deals with whether or not this particular project, its location, design, and relationship to surrounding areas is appropriate for the use as apartments. The developer may, at his discretion, make the units available as rental units, provided the project is built exactly as approved and remains technically a condominium project. However, without a Tax Exempt Bond or other form of assistance, this may not be financially feasible. Finally, the most important question is whether it is it appropriate to finance a project designed and constructed as condominiums though a Tax Exempt Bond intended as a tool for the provision of affordable rental housing, and to do so without the community's involvement. In the past, the community has expressed serious concerns relative to is construction of higher density rental projects, with affordable rental housing being of particular concern. Another concern had to do with projects presented and approved as condominiums, but marketed as apartments. This has come up over and over again in various community meetings, and resulted in an effort by the City to keep the residents informed and involved in the planning process. The project in questions was designed, reviewed, and approved as condominiums. Consequently, it would seem inappropriate to facilitate the construction of the project as an affordable rental development without giving the community an opportunity to comment and review the project. RECOMMENDATION: In light of the above, staff respectively recommends that the Council decline to participate in the Rental Bond Program. However, should the Council wish to pursue in the program, staff will work closely with the developer to facilitate the process. Respcfct ully submitted, Rick Cit PI er g RG OK:jr • Attachments: Staff Report - May 27, 1981 Letter of Request Background Materials W L- 0 — CITY OP RA\C1-i0 CI C(- O \G:\ STAFF RLpotu DATE: May 27, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner roc —� 5 !? SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT N0, 80 -13 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11197 - DIVERSIFIED INVESTItENT - A total residential development comprised of 240 condominium units on 11.5 acres of land wihtin the R -3 zone located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line Road APN 202- 181 -12, 21(portion) 1977 ABSTRACT: The applicants have submitted a total residential project for the development of a planned development consisting of 240 dwelling units designed around a continuous water element on 11.5 acres of land within the R -3 zone. The project is submitted as a planned development and would be so designated on the Zoning Map upon approval by the City Council. The project has received favorable point ratings to allow consideration of the project by the Planning Commission. The project is now being brought before the Planning Commission for its recommen- dation of approval on the Planned Development designation and approval of the Tentative Tract Map. Resolutions and Conditions of Approval are attached for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The project site is generally located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Street (Exhibit "A "). As the Commission may recall, a recently approved Parcel .lap split the property located on the corner, for purposes of developing a professional office complex and to allow the rear portion to be developed as a residential project. The project consists of 240 dwelling units designed as condo- miniums and placed around a continuous water element. The intent of the development is to provide views and frontage to the water element for each dwelling unit. The site is presently zoned R -3 and is General Planned for residential densities at 14 -24 dwelling units per acre. The project is designed at approximately 20 units per acre. The application will require two actions by the Planning Commission; one would be adoption of the attached Resolution which recommends changing the zoning to a Plan- ned Development designation, and secondly, approval of the Tentative Tract Map with the recommended conditions of approval. The site is pre- sently undeveloped and contains a chicken ranch which shall be removed with the development of this project. To the east of the project is an existing mobilehome park and areas to the north and south are presently vacant. The railroad boarders the north boundary of the project. C Staff Report • PD 80 -13 (TT 11797) (2) May 27, 1981 The project has been reviewed under the Growth Management Review process and has received the minimum amount of points necessary to allow consi- deration of the project by the Planning Commission. ANALYSIS: The project, as proposed and with the recommended conditions of approval, will meet the provisions of the State Subdivision Map Act, the City Subdivision Ordinance, and the Zoning Ordinance. As was pre- viously mentioned, the concept of development utilizes a continuous water element flowing through the entire project and providing frontage to each dwelling unit. All dwelling units are provided with private patio areas as well as having the ability to utilize the common open space and recreation areas provided throughout the development. Parking is designed as detached carports and open spaces around the perimeter of the project. The dwelling units are 1 and 2 bedroom. Primary access to the project will be provided by one main entry from Archibald Avenue which aligns with a proposed street on the west side of Archibald. The internal circulation system is basically a loop system which does not interupt or separate dwelling units. Since some of the • carports and parking spaces are on the opposite side of the driveway from the dwelling units, it is recommended that texturized pathways be provided at appropriate locations throughout the development to desig- nate pedestrian crossings. In addition, it is recommended that the entry way be treated with a texturized pavement to enhance the entry and improve the Special Boulevard treatment. Secondary emergency access will be provided at the southeast corner of the project which will be ultimately tied into the proposed professional center on the south end of the project. Under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance a multi ole family develop- ment is required to provide 2.2 parking spaces per unit, one in a carport or garage and the remaining may be in open spaces. A project of this size would require a minimum of 528 parking spaces to meet the require- ments of the Zoning Ordinance. The project applicant is proposing to provide 1 space in a carport for each dwelling unit, and a balance of 260 open spaces which would provide a total of 500 parking spaces: 28 parking spaces short of the Ordinance requirements. The City Planner has reviewed the relationship of the unit sizes to the parking require- ments and feels that with 96 of the units being less then 700 sq. ft, in size that a minor deviation of 5; would be appropriate in this case. If the Commission concurs with this finding, then a Minor Deviation would, hereby, be granted with the approval of this project. • • Staff Report P.D. 80 -13 (TT 11797) (3) May 27, 1981 The present grading of the site falls in a southeasterly direction. The conceptual grading plan has been approved which indicates an insignificant change in the present grade of the land. Drainage of the site will be taken across the southerly parcel to Base Line Avenue to existing drainage improvements. The project will be required to meet the minimum tree requirement for multiple family projects as established by the Planning Commission, In addition to the landscaping, the project is providing an extensive water element throughout the project area. Attached in the exhibits are some sections indicating the landscape treatment proposal along Archibald Avenue which meets the requirements for a Special Boulevard. The applicant has designed the frontage of Archibald to create a diver- sity in the parking arrangement and pockets of landscaping. It is recommended that dense landscaping be provided around the perimeter of the site for appropriate buffering. There are some existing trees on the site which staff recommends saving. • The Design Review Committee has reviewed the architectural design of the structures and the design elements of the project. The Design Review Committee gave a favorable rating of the project contingent upon final approval of the composition shingle roof by the City Planner. The theme of the project is to provide a woodsy appearance with siiulated masonite shingle siding and composition shingle roofing. Colored exhibits and displays will be available for the Planning Commissions review and consideration during the meeting. The number of trash enclosures Provided throughout the development will not meet the needs of the total project and additional enclosures will be required. As these enclosures are being proposed adjacent to the carports, it is recommended that these enclosures be designed with an overhead shade shelter for heat reduction. Details of the trash enclosures and the overhead structure shall be included in the final building plans for review and approval by the City Planner. • Part I of the Initial Study as provided by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field investigation to determine significant adverse impacts that may result from this project. Upon completion of this study, no significant adverse impacts were found as a result of this project based upon the conditions of approval recommended. Therefore, Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project. 1 Staff Report PD 80 -13 (TT 11797) (4) I May 27, 1981 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Daily Report Newspaper and property owners within 300 feet of the project boundaries were notified by mail of this hearing. To date, no corres- pondence has been received for this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input on the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval recommended, then the adoption of the attached Resoluiton and Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. Respc%ctfully submitted, i BARRY .40GAN ,City planner • i ✓ DKH :MV:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Sections Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Tract Map Exhibit "G " - "M" - Elevations Part I - Initial Study Resolution for P.D. designation Resolution for Tentative Tract 11 I' � +1 • i5J RI! lz 7�117 an 1.6 c C . L cc is NORTH CITY OF • RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM:'Rt'W r-knoi5ctit TITLE 3 ( 11'79" LNIIIRIT= Z *= SCALE: 0 Elite Development Company September 25, 1984 Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9321 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Sycamore Springs - 240 Units NEC Baseline & Archibald Dear Mr. Wasserman: Sycamore Springs, a Limited Partnership, would like to request that the City of Rancho Cucamonga provide an inducement resolution allowing the use of the tax exempt • bond financing for this 240 unit development as an apartment project. Therefore, it is formally requested that Sycamore Springs be scheduled for the next City Council meeting on October 3rd, 1984. 1 Several events have occurred during the past year which necessitates that the 64 units under construction now and the remaining 176 units to be built will have to be financed as apartments. In August, 1983, the City of Rancho Cucamonga closed applications for the City's tax exempt bond issue for single family housing. Because our ,joint venture with Lincoln Savings and Loan Association and the purchase of our land was not consummated until after August, it was not possible for us to submit an application including fees before the deadline. We requested that our application be accepted and added to the existing list since the offering had not been prepared vet or the bonds sold. Mr. Tim Beatle discussed this matter with the bond administrator and /or legal counsel and determined that we could not be included. 17581 Irvme Blvd. — Suite 107 • Tustin Calitonnia 92680 • (7 14) 731-1820 9 1 0 Mr, Lauren Wasserman, City Manager September 25, 1984 Page Two We then requested that we be allotted any funds which a developer who had previously submitted an application did not use. This did not occur to my knowledge. We also sent a letter to Mr. Beatle in November, 1983, of which I am enclosing a copy, requesting that we be included in the City's first bond issue of 1984. Due to the lack of congressional legislation permitting tax exempt bond issues until June, 1984, the 1983 issue was postponed and marketed only a few months ago. The 1355 issue was approximately $28 million with each developer receiving an average of $Ij to $2 million of bond funds. Had Sycamore Springs been a participant, we probably would only have received enough funds to sell and finance about 25 of our 64 units in Phase I which equals 10% of the total number of units in the development. However, there was no opportunity to be a part of this issue and there was no subsequent issue in 1984. • Sycamore Springs submitted an application to the County of San Bernardino for their tax exempt bond issue which was sold during this past summer. The amount of their issue was also $28 million. We were advised by Thelma Moore of the County of San Bernardino and Greg Ballinger of Miller and Schroeder, municipal bond underwriting company, that we could not participate in their program because our project was located within an incorporated City that intended on issuing its own bonds. Their bond counsel also verbally confirmed this policy. I am enclosing a copy of our application to the County. In July, 1984, we sent a complete application and package together with a check for $60,000 as an initial fee to Colonial Associates which was required in order to participate in the bond issue sponsored by the California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA). Mr. Tom Putnam, Vice President of Colonial's municipal bond department, and formerly director of CHFA, handled our request. We did not receive any of the $300 million in bond funds sold because total developer requests exceeded $1.6 billion. I have again enclosed a copy of our submittal for your review. • ,; i N Mr, Lauren Wasserman, City Manager September 25, 1984 Page Three As you can see, we have attempted to take advantage of every opportunity to obtain financing that will allow us to build and sell these units in a timely manner. Without at least $10 million to $15 million of tax exempt bond financing for first time homebuyers, this project will not succeed in view of today's conventional. FHA & VA loan rates of 14 %. Since obtaining future tax exempt bond financing for single family housing does not appear encouraging_ and because no bond funds are available for the first phase of 64 units which were started several months as condominiums in anticipation of participating in one of those three bond issues, we must now request the City's approval of an Inducement Resolution allowing us to use tax exempt bond financing to complete the development as apartments. By the terms of the bond issue, many of • the units will be made available to persons with limited incomes. The entire project will be built out in accordance with our plans as condominiums. As I understand it, there will be no direct cost to the City for this issue. Lincoln Savings & Loan Association will obtain tax exempt bond financing through Stifel, Nicolaus and Company, a bond underwriting firm in St. Louis, Missiouri, and provide the funds to this project. A loan must be placed on the development prior to completion of the first phase which is scheduled for December, 1984. It will take approximately sixty (60) days to complete the documentation for the bond issue from the date we receive an Inducement Resolution. Therefore, your cooperation and prompt response to our request will be greatly appreciated. If there are any other questions that I can answer or if there is any additional information you need, please call me as soon as possible. N � T Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager September 25, 1984 Page Four Veer�rrJJ/yyy/ truly yours,/' Charles H. Henderson Partner CHH:nlw Enclosures cc: Mayor Jon Mikels Mayor ProTem Richard M. Dahl Councilman Charles J. Buquet 11 Councilwoman Pamela Wright Councilman Jeff King Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner • • ?i S 0 Elite Development Company November 5. 1983 Mr. Tim Beatle City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Tim: I appreciate your effort in adding Sycamore Investments, which is composed of Elite Development Company, Jack Tarr, and Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, to your list of applicants seeking tax exempt bond financing. If any funds become available in the next proposed issue of 1984, I certainly would appreciate being contacted by your office. • We hope to start construction on 64 condominium units in December, 1983, which will be located near the intersection of Baseline and Archibald. We would like to have our prices start in the high 40's or low 50's but that will depend upon the availability of bond financing. The project will feature streams, waterfalls, and lush landscaning. The total project will consist of 240 units. CJ Thank you again for offering to place me on your priority list for any "fallouts" in the next issue and on your list for any subsequent issues. Sincerely, / n Charles H. Henderson Partner CHH;cla ? / 'L 17581 Ir +me Brod, — Suite 107 • Tustin Calilomia 92680 • (714) 731.1820 �c'pif DEVELOPER OOESTI04NAIRE Item 1. Developer Name Scr CA A (C.%a Dw. c. 7 Item 2. Doing Business as ' Item 3. Date Established 19 A3 J i Item 4. Headquarters Located at 1'7581 �,i s S' i07 Item 5. Developer Representative c ,,k- h`GN n�c,L�P.J Title >�A- 2fi.��'L Phone Number {� /q 73/— /A',1n Item 6. The Developer is a Partnership 'r Corporation A. Partnership Percent Names of all Partners Title Interest Occupation • /i,JCQL) S � L T 6 'L i..i� -rte;. ;?"/ oK 1 e.�dcvctonJ General Managing Partner �CiF Dt;=v B. Corporation Closed Public Names of Maior Shareholders Percent Interest s 9 /c. Names(s) and function(s) of Chief Operating Officer(s): Item 7. Name of your attorney �� STwJn.rA,) firm Name M 6 L'* —,M, r['o,�/ l�u ��,q q,c V' POZe,r.21 Fvs Address ' I ,L ?AC XA27 ,c R /.,d A2 r ocanna tiz tco Phone Number /41 7S.z- YvCex' Item D. The Developer (is is not) the General Contractor. If not, then complete the fo owing regarding the General Contractor: A. Company Name S. Doing business as C. Date Established 0. Headquarters located at • E. Company representative Title: Phone Number ( ) Item 9. The general contractor is a Partnership Corporation Item 10. Please attach the resumes of the individual partners and /or officers of the developer. Item 11. Construction Lenders for the last three years (please attach a list and include the following): A. Name B. Address C. Phone Number 0. Lending Officer E. Development • 2 9/ m Item 12. the company oe d /does not) own the land. • If "not" then complete the following: Opt*on: Expiration Date: Owners Phone: Escrow: Closing Date: Owners Phone: Other ( lea 1 i p se ex a n). Item 13. A. Does your development require an Amendment of the General Plan? N O If yes, please explain: B. Does your development require a Zoning Change? NO If yes, explain: C. Are there any law suits pending, past or threatened? No If yes, explain: Item 14. What further administrative approvals (i.e., tract map approval) are required before construction can begin? -7-b pp Fa4 dv ud�1 rN< Item 15. Are there reasons why the project may not be built as projected? Item 16. A. Has the Developer or any principal ever filed for bankruptcy? _ MD If yes, please explain: 11 3 r 8. Are there any law suits pending or threatened against any Principal or the Developer? _— .111.n if yes. Please explain: C. Has the Contractor or any principal ever filed for bankruptcy? _ No If yes, please explain: D. Are there any lawsuits pending or threatened against the Contractor or a principal? Alf, If yes, please explain: — Item 17. List develoonents built during last three years (please attach a list and include the following): A. Name • B. Location C. Date construction began D. Type of unit E. Price range F. Present status of sales Item 18. Are there any members of your organization currently holding elected or appointed positions with the entity issuing the bonds? If so, list the name of the individual(s), Position(s) held and name of governmental entity. No • a r,/0 DEVELOPMENT 5 through B concern information regarding your housing development( Item 1. Name of development :4 it a.,,., , " Sp 41 ,✓.r _ Item 2. Location of development (list major cross streets and city) Item 3. Type of unit: Number of Number of Units Buildings Per Building Apartment (rental) Condominium /townhouse �L S1 rte, y Single family hones Item 4. Description of units (complete table on page 7) • Item 5. Description of comnon areas, recreational facilities and parking areas: Item 6. Timing of construction Phase I Phase II Phase III T Number of units — C`i �iY (nV R it A6C,D A'Sc,D ABc. Floor plan type [, Date to begin construction 'f /s v II9S Date of completion _ In IV4 /y( i�A6_ o/i Date to begin marketing 11ty id's- II} Date to complete marketing 3In- gk 31J L q/ Item 7. Types of mortgages offered for development '_ Conventional _ FHA _ VA 5 Item B. ConstruCtion Lender �-- Address (D( �i ,i coC c./ W o� 004K'r We Phone number /3l -2/"p Lending Officer _ .L A— F h-7 --%Z; �iyC Item 9. Average estimated sales price per unit f C:�, 973 Average estimated mortgage per unit f C 4'.5 7 y Item 10. Total dollar sales for development f 11; 3131 S4 Total mortgage funds from bond proceeds requested for development S 3,Aoa4aoo Item 11. Number of units Oeveloper intends to finance with bond proceeds 61_ Item 12. Complete the Takedown Schedule (page 8) which sets forth how the Oeveloepr intends to takedown mortgage money. • • 6 a / Q Description of units �9 Garage floor Y units Square tl of tl of S of Dining Bonus tl car Attached or Estimated Sales Plan Per Plan Foot Storles Bedrooms Bathrooms room 7 Room ? Den - Garage Detached Price 1� YD O3 ( ( NoN6 vo b Noon I liar,- S7,S37 g S4 s8o 1' I - 1 D.rr S3,.)-3a- C. 9t ss5o 2 • Ir01 DffT• 74,991 Z r 17-21 .1 DuT 7G Y33 �9 TAKEDOWN SCHEDULE 1984 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct i,.2 668 Nov 166, "66e- Dec 11.1 66, 666. • 1985 Sinn— Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug •Sep Oct Nov Dec 1986 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec TOTAL MORTGAGE FUNDS REQUESTED f -I goo Coo • G/ - �- D6Val�•,e.�rs �wiCT By 6L,7-0 / nIR+�� LocRno.� coNSr �` _ Sat? HYDE 1s p S7"As SP,�J,.+ qxs¢ Q..a r AnIR� 6 /�a <eNCIoS ¢b.fOVb- /oppOO 13CSoCc/ ea KNR�oR LR.F7i /C �{�UA�� GIF e1. GON�OS � iG�o00- /10 000 /s-.L 5ecd f-e, 7° 6v closaJ Jr s /., Lake (77to d 6 � ,�ieedr / %Y3 C.N doS � 7C, S'O I I Sva o Co S.64-, C/O e4rad 1;),44 GM//s IZPM A+4 i+I� OXO 7b _s) Clore d 41l8Y y Sa %'s `Z#N 03 f;m ) -Pav O , o rr�NO CaNJoS �clSeav- CS o0o AU sea i c(— c /9r 7s s /8i NA"O- ADDkExs T� APA S4-L 10701 W -A�. 81id (/n1Y7S Fvor +/awAt✓ 6#w4va (,.,s 4..+WAR.s Soar -y {- �uy�C�J SI-L to l L..�eoC,✓ W (Zr�1x8 -3eae rnaM1.K ,�nQ72;d�6 CaocKae &wK r9000 nA^�A�,�,�bv�5ss-seL RaKi' oP�A» acid. s J- iA2t;ea. GRa6K - rS3k Drw9 CR'%f6 dx og- - /i'fK C-Atd6j4uOi SvcA- O,re - avow ni OWJ4 SPA" ,fs CUCA+ V, r• z cAaw i'- s`Su o vrpA: o 0 0 0 O i t k'20LN SA\ i. AND LOAN ASSOCIATION 01 LINCOLN WAY P.O. BOX 2D27 A MONTEREY PARR, C 91754 DATE July 37. 79RS $60�DOD_00 PAY � 1� SQ7t 1 Of 0,QOr1(:a• �: � LINCOLN SAVINGS TO TPE ORDfP Dr -Colonial Associates 7/31/84 1.0 M MW v,nmml . / /�„mo.•.le spm5 �Jn 4'0000 2 78 7 3 19• I :1 2 2000 7 7 11: 10502808179' -., ...C, L'_5 D� IiNTMN AEGIO•.4L HEAD OFF C! Ulaik ESNK ♦Oi -NGE LE: C.:', IF JH'. .. II ASE DETACH BEFORE OEPOSITIFI Colonial Associates Re: CHFA Bond Funds 18 of $6,000,000.00 Rancho Cucamonga $60,000.00 D E I, / =,C 11 LINCOLN' SAVINGS 101 LINCOLN WAY • P.O. BOX 2729 G 00.278731 AND LOAN ASSOCIATION MONTEREY PARK. CA 91751 " o..n nnf. L, ?I✓ q/ v. 1984 HOME MORTGAGE PROGR:,M -r FRIES A (HMP PROGRAM. E) • PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT EXHIBIT, 5 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION . Sycamore Investments, A Joint Venture A. DEVELOPER: *Elite Development Company, A Joint Venturer Lincoln Savings & Loan Association, a Jt. Venturer 1. Firm Name Charles Jack Tarr, A Joint Venturer 2. Address 17581 Irvine Blvd. - Suite 107 3. City Tustin, California Zip 92680 4. Contact Charles H. Henderson 5. phone ( 714) 731 -1820 _ B. DEVELOPMENT NAME: 1. Legal Name and /or Tract No. Sycamore Investments, Tract No. 11797 2. Marketing /Advertising Name Sycamore Springs 3. Model Sales Office Phone No. ( ) C. DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: (Attach a street map showing location of development) • 1. County San Bernardino 2. City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 3. Street Address 7221 Archibald 4. Nearest Cross- Streets Archibald and Baseline Census Tract No. Target ` Rural_ Non - Target X Thomas Bros. Map Page 6 Coordinates 12 - A -1 D. DEVELOPMENT /HOUSING TYPE: 1. Will the proposed development have a Homeowner's Association? Yes X No (If YES, the development will have to meet a 508 _--_ pre -sale requirement and be appraised on FNMA 1073) If YES to Question 1, answer the followings (COMMON AREA SUBDIVISION 2. 1s the development a condominium? Yes X No 3. Is the development a Planned Unit Development (PUD)? Yes-41 q/ v. 03 Sales models on -site or nearby have been completed and sicr.s ur directing the public to the development • 05 Framing has commenced on those units which are proposed to be marketed and sold with CHFA financing 07 Exterior construction is completed 10 Units are completed entirely, but unsold and unoccupied 6. Do you have a final recorded subdivision map for the phase covered by this commitment? Yes X (Enclosed) No 7. Have you secured final approval from D.R.E. to market? Yes No) If No, by what date do you expect your "white paper "? g/gi- F. INSTITUTIONAL LENDER APPROVALS: 1. Has the development been approved by: a. FHA (In process) Yes_ No X Not Submitted b. FNMA (Fannie Mae) Yes— X Not Submitted c. Other (Specify) 2. Submit evidence of approval by any of the above. G. FINANCING: _ • 1. Have you recorded a construction loan? Yes No; If NO, by what date do you expect to do so or to take equivalent action to secure construction financing? Lincoln IgEincg S Loan Comment: Association, joint venture partner wi oe construction TnJer: Proposed Construction Lender: 2. What do you anticipate to be the source of your takeout financing for those units NOT committed by CHFA? FHA /VA 3. Do you have any outstanding commitments for this development from any lender for any tax - exempt bond financing issued or planned by a, entity of local government? Yes_ No, If YES, which program interest rate and terms? 4. Are there any restrictions by any local tax- exempt bond financing that would prohibit you from using CHFA bond financing? Yes_ No_ H. RECENT SALES ACTIVITY: (If no previous sales, go to Section I) 1. Are you currently, or have you been marketing units in this development within the past year? Yes_ No_ i i� If YES, give bedroom and bath count, square footage and price for each model offered or attach a recent price list). 9/ C Model 1: BR BA Sq. Ft. Price $ ' Model 2: HR aA Sq. Ft. Price $ Model 3: SR BA^ Sq. Ft. Price $ Model 4: BR BA Sq. Ft. Price $ Model 5: BR— Sq. Ft. Price $ 2. Have you used Buydowns in your marketing program? Yes_ No I. LOCAL GOVERNMENT TIE -IN: 1. Is your development subject to the requirements of an inclusionary zoning ordinance mandating that a portion of your units be affordable to persons, of low and moderate income? Yes No Ia. Is this enforced by resale controls attached to the deed? (If YES, submit copy of controls) Yes No 2. Does your development have any tie -in to local government housing and community development programs offering land writedown or othe assistance to make it more affordable to persons of low or moderat income? Yes No 2a. Does this tie -in involve any instrument that becomes a lien o the property? (If YES, describe and submit a copy) Yeses_ No 3. Does the development involve owner participation in the constructi of the unit ( "Self - Help ")? Yes No J. DEVELOPMENT FEATURES: • Please describe the major features of your development or attach a brochure. Sycamore Springs is a 240 unit condominum development featuring heavy landscaping, streams and waters a7ls. inere will ho inn cmimmino nnnl and snn and a recreation building. Each un K. COMMENTS ON MARKETING EXPERIENCE OR PLANS: Elite Develonment Companv has built and sold the following water - oriented projects during the past four years: ern ree , n arro ss nnitc•..9ninnakpr Run k Harhor Greek. Dana Point - 288 units: LaKe urove, Varnen orove - izq uuiL5. rrlUr LV uicac pi v,Jcc�a, the partners of Elite Develonment Cpany have built and financed more than 2,000 units over a period oomf 0 years. E L. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS: 1. For all projects submit the following: • - Street map (preferably a page from the Thomas Bros. street atlas where available) clearly locating the subject site. - Final recorded subdivision map with certificate page, or if not available, one or more of the following: - the engineered final subdivision map (not recorded) - a tentative map - an assessors map page clearly delineating the subject site - any other legible plat map showing the tract, blocks, or scattered site submitted Sales brochure or equivalent "footprint" of the models being offered clearly delineating bedroom and bath count and total square footage and proposed price list. (If the brochure has not been developed, any reasonably descriptive information about the models may be substituted. Large scale drawings and plans are not required and legal or page -size submittals are preferred). 2. For all Condominium /PUD /Townhouse or other common interest subdivisions in addition to the above, please provide the following: (This applies to developments in excess of 10 units) • - Condominium Site Plan: At whatever state of engineering available that clearly shows the proposed phasing (as set forth in the DRE application for a "white paper "), the building layout, lot number scheme and where available, address number scheme for units within development. - Approval: Evidence of FHA or FNMA approval of the development if available. - Price Survey of Competitive Developments: Showing their location on map with list of bedroom and bath count, square footage and prices for each. I 1984 HOME MORTGAGE FROG RAl1- SERIES A (HMP PROGRAM E) PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT EXHIBIT 6 • DEVELOPER AGREEMENT The undersigned Developer ( "Developer ") has submitted Developer Applications to the California Housing Financing Agency ( "CHFA ") for the'following developments: Svcamore Springs, Rancho Cucamonga ( "Developments ") through the following Lender: Colonial Associates, Inc. (address) One Governor Park, 6390 Greenwich Drive - Suite 200. San Diego, California 92122 ( "Lender ") Should these Developments be approved by CHFA for participation in the Home Mortgage Revenue Bond Program, 1984 Series E ( "Home Mortgage Program ") Developer agrees that loans secured by units in these Developments will be purchased by CHFA pursuant to applicable provisions of Zenovich- Moscone- Chacon Housing and Home Finance Act, constituting Division 31 (commencing with Section 56000) of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California ( "CHFA Act "), the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder, the Mortgage Subsidy Bond Tax Act of 1984 ( "Tax Act "), and all agreements, contracts, commitments, manuals, and other documents pertaining to the Home Mortgage Program and amendments thereto, collectively referred to as the "Program Documents ". Developer hereby certifies that for each Development: 1. The information on the Development Application and the attachments thereto is a complete and accurate description of the Development; The Development has met all land use, subdivision, planning, zoning and other development requirements and has received approval from all necessary levels of government, except as followss • 3. There is no pending litigation nor are there any outstanding liens on the Development that would substantially delay the,sale and timely delivery • of mortgage loans to CHFA. Developer further agrees as follows: 1. Program Manual. Developer has received and agrees that its participation in the Home Mortgage Program will be bound by the Program Manual. for the Home Mortgage Program, which is incorporated herein by reference. 2. Fees. Any fees paid by Developer are not refundable unless (1) CHFA has been requested to and has been able in its determination to reallocate a commitment and receive fees from another Developer or Lender or .(2) in the case of Developer's submittal of the 38 commitment fee in the form of a letter of credit upon loan purchase at 978 of the principal amount of the loan by CHFA (as described in the program Manual). 3. Pre - Selection Inspection. Participation in the Home Mortgage Program is subject to a pre - selection inspection of each Development by CHFA. Approval of a Development is evidenced by the issuance of a Development number which will be used to make reservations of individual loans. 4. Pre-Sales. CHFA has established 518 presale requirements Tor condominiums and planned unit developments as • set out in the Program Manual. Only owner occupied units can be counted against the 518 presale requirement. 5. Approved Models. CHFA will purchase loans secured only by single family dwelling units as described in Exhibit A -3 attached to this Developer's Agreement at a price per unit no higher than that price originally accepted by CHFA. The developer understands that the bid prices for each model on the- A-3 cannot be increased and remain in effect for the full commi Lic.enL period. The purchase price approved by CHFA on the A -3 is within the safe harbor sale price limits established by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Should that safe harbor number be readjusted by the IRS, Developer will reduce the purchase price of the unit to conform with such reduced IRS safe harbor limits unless Developer is able to reallocate the commitment for any affected units and such reallocation is approved by CHFA. 6. Delivery Period. CHFA will purchase loans only during a period of 18 months following the delivery of the bonds sold to finance the Home Mortgage Program. Delivery date is anticipated to be September 15, 1984. 7. Cancellation. CHFA may cancel commitments at the following times for the following reasons as more specifically described in the Program Manual: a!Z-r (a) Six months from delivery of the bonds for fzilu:e to submit a final recorded subdivision map; (b) Nine months from delivery of the bonds for failure to obtain building permits; • Ic) Twelve months from delivery of the bonds for failure to deliver loans in an aggregate amount equal to 258 of the development's commitment for conditional approval as described in the Program Manual. S. Indemnification. Developer will indemnify and hold CHFA harmless against any and all losses, claims, damages or liabilities to which CHFA may become subject arising from any and all warranties, express or implied, as to merchantability or fitness of a particular purpose Developer has made or may make in the future in connection with those housing units constructed or to be constructed by Developer for which mortgage loans are purchased by CHFA. Additionally, Developer agrees to indemnify and hold CHFA harmless against any and all losses, claims, damages or liabilities for which CHFA may become liable, for any and all defects, latent or otherwise, in all housing units to be constructed by Developer for participation in the Home Mortgage Program. Dated: duly 23. 1989 SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS Developer: Elite Develooment Comoany Address: 17581 Irvine Blvd. - Suite 107 • Tustin California 92680 Telephone: (71,,,4) 731 -18/20 Authorized Signature: l/ /� 3 • • 1984 NOME MORTGAGE PROGRAM �ENIES A ("UMP•PROORAM E ") • Development Name Sycamore CUMMITMENT Shrines AG111;6 f FURM A -3 Lender Lincoln Savines & hoalgo- San Bernardino Development Address Sycamore 7221 Archibald nvestments - City 6 'Lip Rancho Cucamonga 91730 — Developer Elite Development Compaq - -_ -__ Total Units in Development ('this Phase) 2.10 Targeted Rural Bd- Ba Sq. 11t. Model A 1 1 632 Model B 1 1 580 Model C 2 2 890 Model D 2 2 887 Model 5 Model 6 D Model 7 _ (4 Model 8 Signed by (Lender): Firm Name By Non - Targeted g Census Tract No. Price* Bid Amount Commitment Accepted $ 64,600 Est. 240 Units at $- 58,500 Average Sale Price of $ 81,900 $ 72,973 S 81.400 x .95 - $60,494 $ Est. 240 Units at $ TOTAL LOAN FUNDS $ REQUESTED: $ $ 16,637,500 Signed by (Developer): Sycamore Investments Firm Name Elite / Development Companv By 6f( Na e�o // c�t,9 n Date (Rounded to Nearest $500). TOTAL LOAN-FUNDS- COMMITMENT AMOUNT AWARDED; $ Accepted for CHFA by: By THE DEVELOPMENT NUMBER 1S • The bid price is the maximum sales pr.ice of the unit that can be submitted to CIIFA for loan purchase. The bid price c: -it be raised durina the 10 month delivory onr;nn •11 .0 IL I I � .. ...• YIO \u`jy�•r .111Y 11 �- A, .li'4'ar li L IIL� n•nr• �I ...r ... �.1- ; j A I .I� i 1 I I � �. I`• F� , I• I'��- 1 uu.il J� i _ 1 _ II I �I �� 1 I I I1 _4 • I r:. .rr.n`I I !r� .. �:.�M•r: r.r ' i i I t ,�l �i .l ........ 1 •3d ,��T�l1ii L_' ; I � [I I -.i r i ; , r � �� t'I �3L�,h,,,,Irlr [t•..:�:,� I ; I� I I,lu " "I_.r. „r, 2 I m i ....1• w .0 I � I i . r 41I r •l F i, :I I _ f _' I .. ,e u L ► ,- .. _ _ ./ FODiNILL_ BLVP j i.x�, 1, •11` I ; I' I � y , �..': ri . �l 1, .,... ,.,d,. I I I I a:• 1 nlrP SOW - -- . r .ncn I- I I I 4 ...,., 1 1 II ' I.+l .1 etnr T-1 -� _ e- I IM11 tr'� <v i - e•'I. �I I o I I I I ac AIJA 5T r it ..__I_ -"I•j r=_�” --�-. I - __ r ,. ... I 1 Lrn x i I •, a s. -•, I ,... - rY .,r I I___ sr il, 1 V i _ — _.'__I V t — _ r ,.1,--- !'n' —_� I �, ST I. lr._ 'I 1 6 _ 6I I I I1 — r 1� �•`�..� I 1 I's i -is 14,1 Fl Ms. I's 77- i -is 14,1 --l— —s — 77- MARKET SURVEY - SAN BERNARDINO COUNTS 9/z -r • • No. of Project Units Plan So. Ft. Sales Price Rancho 82 A 2 Bd..2Ba. 1,168 579,900 Villas B 3 Bd.2Ba. 1,568 S85,900 Acacia Orchard 104 A 2 Bd.lBa. 766 559,900- 562,900 Meadows Ph.1-62 B 2 Bd.l} Ba. 1,146 $74,990 Ph-2-62 C 3 Bd.2} Ba. 1,312 $83,900 Creekstone 60 A 2 Bd.1Ba. 752 $75,998 Barratt B 2 Bd.2Ba. 892 $84,990 C 3 Bd.2Ba. 982 586,990 D 4 Bd.2j8a. 1,252 $95,990 j Country Studio 1 340 339.900- S41,900 Oaks Studio 2 400 $47,900- $49,900 Barratt 1 Bd. 1 Ba. 513 554,900- 558,900 2 Bd. 2 Ba. 746 $66,900 - $67,900 9/z -r • • t ( l y _ <•J�� it --__ -- -- I _ e — fr %cIk` -- -� if - is 7 0 • MARKET SURVEY - SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY No. of Project Units Plan Sq. Ft. Sales Price Rancho 82 A 2 Bd.28a. 1,168 $79,900 Villas B 3 Bd.2Ba, 1,568 $85,900 Acacia Orchard 104 A 2 Bd -1Ba. 766 $59,900- $62,900 Meadows Ph.I -62 B 2 Bd.l+l Ba. 1,146 $74,990 Ph.2 -62 C 3 Bd.2} Ba. 1,312 $83,900 Creekstone 60 A 2 Bd.1Ba. 752 $75,998 Barratt B 2 Bd.213a. 892 $84,990 C 3 Bd,2Ba. 982 $86,990 D 4 Bd.2}Ba. 1,252 $95,990 Country Studio 1 340 $39,900 - $41,900 Oaks Studio 2 400 $47,900 - $49,900 • Barratt 1 Bd, 1 Ba. 513 $54,900- $58,900 2 Rd. 2 Ba, 746 $66,900- $67,900 • `J E At l.TTl1 ! CVv.rIU�C STAFF REPORT DATE: October 3, 1984 , TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Circulation and Access Issues at Deer Canyon School At the opening of the Deer Canyon School for the 1984 -85 school year, traffic congestion was experienced, causing concern about emergency access and school bus movements. Staff has been directed to look into the seriousness of the problems and possible corrective action. Setting Deer Canyon School is located on Hamilton Street, a partially developed local residential street and gains access from one direction only, This access also requires travel over a minimum of 800 feet of local residential streets. These streets provide width for only two lanes of traffic since they must serve the parking needs of the abutting property. Reported Problems Observations and reports indicate that, during times when a large number of parents use private cars to transport children to school, a backup of waitng cars occurs and results in a line of stopped vehicles extending out onto Hamilton Street. This stacking of vehicles, combined with illegal and legal parking along Hamilton Street, has impeded the movement of school busses and raised concerns about emergency vehicle access. The reported problem now occurs only during storms or at times when a school activity requires parents' presence. There is also a severe weekend parking shortage during soccer games, which results in illegal parking on Hamilton. Recent Action At the request of the Fire Marshall, the no parking zones near the school were reviewed by the Traffic Engineer. As a result, the signs for the existing zone along the north side of Hamilton were augmented and new parking prohibitions were placed into effect on the south side (Exhibit A). Along with this, there will be increased enforcement effort by the Sheriff against illegal parking. y r CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Circulation and Access Issues at Deer Canyon School October 3, 1984 Page 2 • This action will provide school bus and emergency vehicle access, even during crowded conditions, provided all parking is in legal areas. PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS Alternate Access Ideally, the school should be located on a through street, not only for emergency access but for the convenience of users and neighbors. School property extends to Hermosa Avenue, making it possible to extend Hamilton to Hermosa without the purchase of right -of -way from other properties. Exhibit B shows that the alignment of Hamilton would have to be shifted slightly south to accomplish this. This would require slight reconstruction of existing improvements at the parking lot and would result in an acceptable intersection on Hermosa. (Grade differential at Hermosa necessitates the use of a full 60 feet of right -of -way.) This work would provide a second access and additional on- street parking and would solve the congestion problem during bad weather. The cost is shown on Exhibit 3. The use of sixty feet of this portion of the school property for a street would affect the process of its acquisition as park property, which is underway at this time. . Additional Widening As an aid to circulation for busses and fire trucks, widening could be accomplished along the school frontage within existing right -of -way and by purchasing 140 feet of right -of -way as shown on Exhibit C. With parking restrictions and special striping, this work would reduce congestion without the extension to Hermosa. The cost is shown on Exhibit C. Proper Circulation Ultimately, upon the development of the portion of the school property adjacent to Hermosa, or the property to the north, Hamilton should be extended to provide proper circulation for the area. Exhibit D shows an additional alternate for a Hamilton Street extension which would minimize right -of -way purchases of non - school property and reduce the street width so that there would be no parking available on the street. This would, however, leave the completion of the street to the developers of the adjacent property. Respgctfully submitted,,, LBH:PAR: jaa • Attachments • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - - -- /\V VSUWplH �1S 3113NON91IN AV OV31SlVH A z 0 K z 2 EXHIBIT A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'a z AV CIV31SIVH O � O o v � o N 3 ce H w2 VI C d Cj r N 7 V W N W I ? v 0. P+ • ILI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -.-offic-z AV 0V31SlVH m o0 aI Y VI 3 O � 2 N � W 10 Ot d O 'o 'o a _ On m - -- -- - -AV v5VWn]H FLS 311340NOIW EXHIBIT C CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,MONGA a ull a J N ___ ls� vllllava N 10 0 0 7 J O AV OV31SlVH fJ Z O p O o 0 U o O u _ C 3 N 1� N V t7 3 a >� 3 � V N � 3 � t • z 01 2 vV Z >u O _ O¢ V nV vsowa3H I---� 3113NON 91W 10 0 0 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �acnn4atic MEMORANDUM' , Date: September 27, 1984 To: From: Subject: BACKGROUND' City Council S City Manager D Dick M ar Project Cordinator U", AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR REAR GULCH PARK DEVELOPMENT PROTECT On September 25, 1984, bids were received from seven bidders for the Rear Gulch Park Development Project, The City's estimate for the 4.5 acre park site development was $250,000, including four additive alternates. Mathis Environmental, Inc. of Rancho Cucamonga, was the lowest qualified bidder of the seven companies submitting bids with a base bid proposal of $229,293.00. With the four additive alternates included in the project, their total bid was $247,443.00. A tabulation of the results of the seven bid proposals is attached for your reference. Sufficient funds are available in the Park Development Fund for the award of the bid base and four additive alternates. • RECOMMENDATION• That the City Council award a construction contract to Mathis Environmental, Inc. as the lowest qualified bidder on this project in the amount of $247,443.00, including the four additive alternates, and authorize the funding from the park development fund for the full contract amount plus 10% for contingency purposes. a CITY DF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJECT: BEAR GULCH PARK DEVELOPMENT Date: September 25, 1984 LOCATION: 9070 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga N/E Corner Arrow Route and Bear Gulch Place FIRM Base Bid Additive idd rive hive ttive TOTAL Mathis Environmental $229,293.00 $1,950.00 $10,000.00 $5,900.00 $ 300.00 $247,443.00 Challenge Engineering $237,700.00 $1,725.00 $11,400.00 $6,300.00 $ 500.00 $257,625.00 R & R General Contractor $258,350.00 $1,400.00 $ 6,80D.00 $5,900.00 $4,800.00 $277,250.00 W.D. Gott Contractors $284,701.00 $1,676.00 $13,33I.00 $8,914.00 $1,106.00 $309,728.00 Redlands Paving Co. $311,861.00 $1,893.00 $10,450.00 $6,019.00 $5,005.00 $335,228.00 v Tracy & Haigh $320,750.00 $1,500.00 $ 9,400.00 $6,100.00 $5,650.00 $343,400.00 Vance Corporation $349,870.00 $ 550.00 $11,250.00 $8,500.00 $ 700.00 $370,870.00 11 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COGMoj MEMORANDUM Date: -September 27, 1984 p To: City Council and City Manager L 19` From: The Park Development Commission B ay y: Dick M NNopYroject Coordinator Subject: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE NAMING OF THE UNNAMED PARK SITE ON CHURCH STREET, EAST OF TURNER AVENUE AS CHURCH STREET PARK BACKGROUND At the July 18, 1984 City Council meeting, the City Council selected and approved by Resolution the official names to be used in conjunction with the park facilities that are presently either developed or can reasonably he expected to develop in the near future. A park site, located on the north side of Church Street, east of Turner Avenue, however remains unnamed. With regard to this unnamed site, the Historic Preservation Commission recommended to the Park Development Commission, that the park be named Church Street Park. This recommendation is based on two main factors. First, the parksite is located on Church Street. Second, Church Street is one of the oldest streets within the City and is named after a City Historic landmark. Both of these factors are consistent with the naming policy guidelines approved by the Park Development Commission, The Park Development Commission concurs with the recommended naming of the parksite as Church Street Park and is herein recommending such to the City Council for approval by Resolution. Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the name Church Street Park, as recommended by the Park Development Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission, for the unnamed park site on Church street. / 7 .� 0 RESOLUTION NO. 84- 1$'& A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE NAMING OF THE UNNAMED PARK SITE ON CHURCH STREET AS CHURCH STREET PARK WHEREAS, at it's regular meeting of September 6, 1984, the Historical Preservation Commission recommended to the Park Development Commission that the unnamed park site on Church Street be named Church Street Park; and WHEREAS, at it's regular meeting of September 20, 1984, the Park Development Commission concurred with the recommendation of the Historical Preservation Commission; and WHEREAS, both Commissions recommended that the park site be officially named by the City Council as Church Street Park: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: • SECTION 1. That the unnamed park site on the north side of Church Street, east of Turner Avenue be officially named as Church Street Park, PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of October, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk 0 /J/ Jon D. Mikels, Mayor A MEMORANDUM VA z7 44 i P __.0, DATE: September 28, 1984 ' T0: City Council FROM: Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk SUBJECT: Agenda Item 6F: Agreement with Sohn Carl Warnecke For Design of a Civic and Public Safety Facility Not all information was available at the time the Agenda was run. Materials will be delivered to members of the City Council prior to the October 3rd meeting.