Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/05/16 - Agenda PacketF-1 L L � ��cA.Nr,,� U U .4 OT F 2 > 1977 crrY OF RANCHO CUGaMONGA CITY IOU UL lYE TA Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California May 16, 1984 - 7:30 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing, The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Wright — I Buquet Mikels Dahl nd King _ C. Approval of Minutes: April 4, 1984 April 18, 1984 May 2, 1984 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS A. Thursday, May 17, 1984, 7:15 p.m. - PARK ADVISORY COMMITTEE, Lions Park Community Center. B. Wednesday, May 23, 1984, 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, Lions Park Community Center. C. Tuesday, May 29, 1984, 7:30 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION, Community Library meeting room. D. Presentation of 1984 Spring Clean Poster Contest Awards. City Council Agenda -2- May 16, 1984 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RICHARD AND PHYLLIS NEWTON FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -08 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME u 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. A. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 84 -05 -16 and I Payroll ending 4/30/84 for the total amount of $419,623.54. B. Forward Claim against the City by Philip H. Perdue to 5 the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier for handling. C. Approval of acceptance of Final Tract No. 12320 from 6 Barclays -Terra for their project located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 84-125 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL MAP OF TRACT 12320 D. Approval of acceptance of Real Property Improvement 12 Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by Hillside Community Church for CUP 82 -29, located at 5354 Haven Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -126 16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH FOR CUP 82 -29 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME E. Approval of acceptance of a Real Property Improvement 17 Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by Richard and Phyllis Newton for DR 83 -08, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Grove Avenue RESOLUTION NO. 84 -127 22 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RICHARD AND PHYLLIS NEWTON FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -08 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME u Ll City Council Agenda -3- May 16, 1984 F. Approval of acceptance of Real Property Improvement 23 Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by William and Dona Barnes for a single family residence at 12715 Summit, located west of Etiwanda Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -128 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM WILLIAM AND DONA BARNES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME G. Release of Bonds: 4th Street Storm Drain - Located on the north side of 4th Street, 2300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue; owner, Etiwanda Investment Company (Pic -N- Save). Release Labor S Material Bond $176,000 H. Approval of a Storm Drain Easement Deed from Southern 29 California Edison Company to the City of Rancho • Cucamonga for 7th Street, west of Etiwanda Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -129 34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR 7TH STREET, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME f. Approval of completed plans and specifications for the traffic signal at Carnelian Street and Lemon Avenue. Estimated cost is $60,000. It is recommended that the project be advertised for construction. J. Approval of adoption of criteria for Lending Agencies 35 For the 1984 Residential Mortgage Revenue Bond Program to establish the criteria which all participating lending agencies must conform to in the proposed Mortgage Bond Program. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -130 37 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPATION BY LENDERS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOME MORTGAGE FINANCE PROGRAM City Council Agenda -4- May 16, 1984 K. Approval of final plans and specifications for the Bear 40 Gulch Place, Arrow Route 6 Arrow Park grading improvements and authorization to advertise for construction bids. , L. Set public hearing for June 6, 1984 to approve Development District Amendment 83 -07, Archibald Associates, from Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 4.5 acres of land located on Archibald Avenue, south of Victoria - APN 202 - 181 -15. M. Set public hearing for June 6, 1984 for Appeal of Planning Commission decision approving Tentative Tract 12532, Archibald Associates. N. Set public hearing for June 6, 1984 for Appeal of Planning Commission decision denying Conditional Use permit 84-02, Harp. 0. Set public hearing for June 6, 1984 for consideration of Development Agreement between Lewis Homes and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • P. Set public hearing for June 20, 1984 to form Landscape 41 14 Maintenance District No. 5 for the open space area .. i within Tract 11915 -1, located at the northeast corner of Turner Avenue and 26th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -131 43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 5, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -132 47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 84 -133 48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING L� ITS INTENTION TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. DISTRICT NO. 5 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 City Council Agenda -5- May 16, 1984 Q. Set public hearing for June 20, 1984 for Annual 51 Assessment and preliminary approval of City Engineer's Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. I. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -134 55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 84 -135 78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO R. Set public hearing for June 20, 1984 for Annual 81 Assessment and preliminary approval of City Engineer's Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria). RESOLUTION NO. 84 -136 84 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 84 -137 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO • City Council Agenda -6- May 16, 1984 S. Set public hearing for June 20, 1984 for Annual 111 Assessment and preliminary approval of City Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance Districts No. 1, 2 and 3 RESOLUTION NO. 84 -138 114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 84 -139 115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. I FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO • RESOLUTION NO. 84 -140 119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 84 -141 120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 84 -142 124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE Is DISTRICT NO. 3 • City Council. Agenda -7- May 16, 1984 RESOLUTION NO. 84 -143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. FORMATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 - It is recommended that City Council determine that the public necessity, health, safety and welfare require the formation of Underground Utility District No. 2 along Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Base Line Road and adopt the attached Resolution forming said District. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM CHURCH STREET TO BASE LINE ROAD B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84 -01 - RICHWOOD - A Development District Amendment from Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 16.3 acres of land, located on the south side of Arrow Highway, north side of 9th Street, between Baker Avenue and Madrone Avenue - AFN 207- 261 -02 and 07, 207- 132 -01 through 37. ORDINANCE N0. 226 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 207 - 261 -02 AND 07, AND 207 - 132 -01 THROUGH 37, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW HIGHWAY, NORTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET, BETWEEN BARER AND 14ADRONE AVENUES FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DU /AC) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DU /AC). 125 127 136 138 151 City Council Agenda -8- May 16, 1984 r C. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING A TIME 153 EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11781 - ROBERTS GROUP - A total residential development of 76 condominiums on 6.4 acres of land in the Medium- Residential District (4 -14 du /ac), located on the west side of Hermosa, approximately 330 feet north of 19th Street - APN 202 - 171 -29 6 38. D. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING 176 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -01 - WEST - The development of a coin - operated car wash on .45 acres of land in the General Commercial district, located on the southeast corner of Foothill and Helms - APN 208 - 261 -54. E. REVENUE SHARING - EPA 15 - Appropriation of Entitlement 204 Period 15 of Revenue Sharing. 5. NON- ADVERTISED HEARINGS A. STATUS REPORT OF ACQUISITION OF TRAINING LEVEE FOR 205 FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES - R.C. LAND CO. - Construction of Training Levee providing Flood Protection for Tracts • 11934, 12044, 12045, and 12046. Approval is recommended of agreement with R.C. Land Co. to cover ' all costs involved In the condemnation of lands required for the construction of a flood protection training levee. r - -' 1 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No Items Submitted 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. DISCUSSION ON ITEM REGARDING CITY COUNCIL INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY - The City Council appointed a subcommitte to formulate suggestions and come back this meeting. B. CONSIDERATION OF HISTORICAL COMMISSION VACANCY C. DISCUSS PROCEDURE FOR FILLING VACANT PLANNING COMMISSION POSITION 8. ADJOURNMENT PI 263 PUBLIC EMPL FETIREMECT 51-TEM 646 MAIM WPEHINIEIII ASSLC 379 AMBMGSE, .i NLY 647 SANCHE2, LANIEL E :UTH 647 SANCHEZ. DANIEL 6 RUTH 462 KUFN, MARY 445 MAFPICIT MOTEL 14 ACTION TnANEL A:. 1n 1 463 wASSERFAK, LAFEA 576 KING, JEFF.EY 615 WRIGHT, FAKHL4 6CS MILNE, it A.SDN 336 GLLNCALE F"ErAL :AVI 465 INTEFVA71ONAL C11Y ,•CV1 a -t:: 476 CANL „ARAEN E A 314 LCFIMEn, M-" 248 PEA FLC 14 A C F TIRE SERVICE 613 A A KV ING 2 A -AA6LE LCCK 4 KtY 14 ACTILn INAVEL ACLN.:Y 146 ARCH17ELTS C FLAXNC- L+ .TJ.t 31 &ANA OF AMEFY.A N1 .. iA 33 BASELINE HAnGHa.t 35 BEAR GULCH 71RE D.RVICE 188 BECRCSIAN' HCTCH 40 BEST CFFI.E hdC.,T. 41 ?15HGP CGMFAKY 53 C G ENGINEEFIHC 635 CALIF ENERGY CCV415i7Un 62 CALIF -AKIA JCU.NAL L24 STATE LF CALIFLRNIA 631 CALLAGHAN E C.MPANY 550 CAn III, INGFIC 643 CHAPFET CLLLEC! '.Intl SERVICt•- ITEM CESLP. 1AFF.. CHECK. [NiAt AF P,F 4/15154 CA CATE 4,27, %4 31523, 115.4 - 13:34 StrIAAN CK CATE 41,11=4 li :3v. LK CATE 5/21/24 LiHt. lliVi 11 -3f• SETTLEMENT CA CATE h/ ? 01HE= 1TE'45 :3,37 .LIILEMENI CH DAIS h/: i.c4 1153c. HEEL lAC h /21 /c5 `` -:S� CL.NtE`E 51:7 -15 .R.. ilcl °_ :3 %4L. CGNFE HENCE NLi 5/37-11 `IHLF it•a 11>hl. ;ASH ACV 5 /1T - .1FEn I l["S 11542'• LAS,. ACV 5/11 -15 IS 11543+ :Air. ACV 5/11 -:5 C .1 HEM liEYa 11:54. rE11Y CASH >I HLd tl!i 1155,-. F,N 87Y,E4 11546, 1,6 4,25.65 11541. lit B. CK LATE 4 /14/c4 .; .lr en Ilt•i l.tc:' 1.tE4 - 13131 ELECT 104 c .. L:EF 111; 1- 1 --13: 11..3 - I, IL3 Ll RICE SGPPL li: .IRE. tl lYa :3115 13:L5 - 13254 VEHICLE r.AJ NT 1341 .-FUND 6n iL34 :3:11 S:Ei it INE 13.62 ARE AIF FARE ,. .1 Htn Ilf rS 13.,3 GAAPnjij n(2i :ia 4 -( 4C24-IC 46-3 iC 4-:511 E LIFER 11E1- 3:15 FLEE$ AO REPAIR 21! 132 131 iliJ 5 /13-5/4 -t S% LdeANILL. T3.6S MAIN7 5UFPLIIS L .1Rk. .10: :327:. ENG SERVICES 13271 ZN-KBY CGNSERYAIIC% SIANOA..S 13:72 6/E4 -6/65 13275 CECA GVILELIA:S i >5.- e].- iC:2 -C 33274 FLbLIC:TIOVS 13:7> CLASS 621. :3.71 C3/ RENIAL t /:iv 5 13271 1 .A.. Ay: . 11.454.41 i4. it t .LL cc .(C 55 .CE 421 .LC 57S.CC ..00 (.LL 55. C•t -6 -.t I :5 5(t.59 i2. -4'.r It IS: .ei a ,e 55.LL 15.7; 22.LC .90 14'.4: 55.5. II: hC ,.+1�^ . - �..�.�...� ■ ONE F■. B .om :; ' F A% : =f�' 1751 [i wAkFAN11 PAYEE ------------------- - - - - -- 10 643 $1 367 633 363 63 65 66 E7 546 107 617 tlt 117 196 632 249 135 137 Ale 142 292 143 COE 00 157 ISE 163 t42 172 612 669 175 622 525 114 369 136 t41 Be CMANdEh GF CLrKhLE CLAPPER, 6LB CLAREMCNI eLUEPKEkl COMPA.,Y COCA -COLA — ITLING CLAFANY C1 LA CONSOLIDATEC ELECTRICAL .117 iNC COPY LIME CCkF COVINGTON E CRP.LE CULAMGLGA _C .AIEA CI' -I CUCAMONGA -3 WATER L16T CULAMGkGA Ph PIT INC DAVIDSON. SUSIE DETCO DUSTMAN. R E GREENLEE, NANCY EMPEY, hAmwY EVANS, KEVIN FUJI? E TAI3AMI G C P MACHINE C- kADIATCW GENERAL ELECIn IC GENERAL IELEFnE%E C,. Glasom, CAMli TlhC GOMEZ, FICA CPS CONSULTING _141L iNG GRANT. JERRY k. HAhiMAN, DiVLN ECAARC G HILL, JA VOLLEY, '4LLLIAM L. MGLLIOAY .%h C_.' ENC. lap. INTERNATIONAL TIME etCC kL_n J. h. CO NC nt IE C R JAiSCMAE, IN- JERSEY INTL. Ldu,r, 1%" JOBS AVAILABLE NEELt, GAR, KROUIIL, 6ITC KRUSE. JOAN A LAN, JACK LEAIS NLMt3 LIESCh. LEA LINVILLE- SAYLEFSO6 C ASSOCIATES • k4L:PL CLCArLNGA PACE . ITEr Li SLR wAANk xA,F JI.I. ----------------------------------------------- - - - - -- MAY REFUND CONSI PdF :563 r FIAIIhG LC ME 4ERIGlF NA IA1 IOG = JlnEk lIEYS LEGAL SEFVLA '2 lk 62EC MELLMEMAR Y rn C lI,C. IlErl L I91h2hA7tc PAY L .ir.Cn 11 Ena CLASS OF lnt MAY:. CLASS 6234 R RrFUNCFJND El CLASS 270 nEFGA 5 L CLASS J7L /5_YC FIEEAGF -MAY At1Nd VEHICL SI eEAUI VEHICLE R MAINZ 155- 45f6 /5nER1F :S C _1h :A IlE'I_ WBUNC At' CLeSSc 5 •ILEAGr -MAY IAN BERNAFCINL ROAD IKFk L,EN7N7S MILtAG,-MAY nEFGNU CLKSI PER 14.15 dASELIKE 1r1LLlKtN MILEACE -SAY , 31 hEh Ilk -a A.Fn AL1 ulh_N llE1b ,,PIE., III PAINT RENEWAL 4.1 h /t4- 41 :51EE P3 :7C6 VEHICLE MAINZ L1ntR IIL °a CGLt R, VUA, NLE EF. V6K hV.cN A.SaC1ASSIS PLANN,:m : Tnir :IEr- nc_tWa NEC CLASS 1nArEL Ailft F.NLTES 4/11164 _ Llr:h III" KILtAG3 -MIT KEFUNO CLKSI rEk 1217 McFUNO KEC CLASS CHURCH iT C :InE, 11t4i 7 . 1324 :3279 :32dC cl 3i 133? 132z4 -132,"6 132,6 :32,7 3dE I32c6 3 291 13:51 3292 3253 3294 32v4 13:96 13261 1329, : 3396 113PG 3C 1 1:3::2 :33 (-3 33C9 3 ,6 : a3o7 :33CE 1-31.6 133:1 133:3 13, 131.3 319 13316 :3Cl 1331 I 133:, I,000.co 2 St.OL t6.56 YL. 422.22 42 3, E.46 L, 4Y1.5C 436.( d 637.46 L3 .LL 41.5_ h 2E.:1 tt .CC t7.oC .Dc ! `.2 2.29 9CC.CC 75.13 415.74 C 4.,7 3L.CC 26L .CC 7,:92.00 171 .1-L 2cc .C, i .-2: .3( 421.6: E33.SL !3.15 9371 93 l2IQ s(. IS.CC 21. EL Y.(G 2 FC. 5l." vG 1.432. SC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • l9-I1f-14 .. • OF 4ARRANT6 �ANCh57 CUCAn ON6A MA6E 3 • PAYEE _________________________________________________________________ Ili" 'ki'll __ __ _______ .EAAk, ____________________ dAnk.:nl. 611 LITTLE FED SCM00L HOUSE CONST PAPER 13315 1;L.35 607 LIVINGSTON MECICAL PRCC CO POCXEl MAiM 1732( 61.E1 314 LOh IMER, Mann LLE_IICN 13321 3'.CL 200 LCS AAGEIES IIYE! 5/5 -E /4 1;32I IE.00 " • 907 M C M REF FI GERATION, H1G, ALC 2U3LCIN4 MAINI !3323 555.CC 1 MALI MANN ASCUAIEi 6EFYL.k 0 iTUHY 0 C .,) HcR ]1E: ^> 1 ?324 S, ;((.(L 496 96 MAFCGII, MICHAEL i 4131 C 4/12 72325 555.0. 631 MARTIN, CALMO r VEHICLE 1332E 32a MARIINE7 OA 5 =4viCE VEHICLE nA3NT AINT 13121 1,7 ;:.43 23 MC AAUGHAN, h6bEhl P,E. N, PEAK CM i/1 -CITE 3321 15C 615 MEl FARRAR YASGNHY hEFLNC e! EC TC is ;3325 E1.55 _ 136 $81 INC 3EFV ICE AGREEMENT 1333( L1.E! 567 NE7HOAX ORM C09HUV1CA 1IUAN Mal RENTAL 33A1 2(.0 110 ISRLAtSSltn RGvIFIC MA VEHICLE MAL .11 :Eh IIf3h 1333: 152.45 154 COMPEAl1C PACIFIC COMFE n: ]AL 3NLdER4LE .LAS FENS AI SICRA'vE S fAL1LIIY 13333 tt .C4 515 PALM2 F, ERIK CLASS In STRLCI)G 135_5 ;Ct.6E 617 PANEI ZcPHERS, :Y HUN FIN JOURNAL ]37;. 67.CL 61/6 E PEA WE Cc PL!IT IGN SEFVI _E :k60Y /f 3LE 2651 km 13337 �Z.CL PEA PGO 'iFICE SUPPLIES LnEF I1E FS 13331 115.7E 635 PITN_Y c' -A =5 SIAG PG5IAGE AETF2 1733c 11L.51 255 P4nA CESIh]9J11EL FUEL S;C3s 258 R C P ALUCAMG IaE VEP.ICLE MA]nl .1hEF 11Ers :3311 113.0: 636 RANCHO GISPCSNGA fIJ:.EF S. 3P fh21E F5 _I Pik 13;51 151.11 C26 RANCHS 5AL 6525 NO ciH1L 7 ♦IFik JIE.> I1E:s 13'5. 111.7: 616 TIRE HALL'S TIRE Si FV 1F6 1nOLM E4L 710 PEO Hlll L FcA"E FFAFES 133 +4 1G2.2, 175 VNLLZ REY6CLLN IIE•'s 13 :5L 531.(-1 873 RITZ 8172 ;IUEeA .Cnll17 F;LALFG ISIPT64 RELIEF IAISILIE - IPk. k ITE'> 133il 25.1: 216 RIVERS IRI wLLEFk InI �FFICE SLPPlILS TK _ ..TFEh IT Et! 1335- 2,t 276 ROBERT RI11) MLLES 4S2MAY 1335E 23( .11 L0 5'6 DRIG ROOHIGLESL D!ALNA CLASS 616E 1535 131 .tc 515 RCG1, LESLIE C 4131 -314 • + :: -- - 301 SAN 6ERAAk _J. 9 Ehlf .1 FAY 33so] 112 .G( 114 —%C SAN 6E F•LL F...Si C0:'n TV .LMF IICnEli .39: _ 614 SCMNFIDER, GLACYS ntFJAL RTC CLASSES ?73x? ,CL 176 SEVEN DAY AUIL PAhls VEHICLE MAINE tIFEc 111'1 ILc,S 9,.33 623 SMITH, ALSEI'AnIE d -FLNO dEC LLAE1 1;31: 31C SOJIb -AN CALIF. LAI.LiCAF, •aYF. APRIL PAINT 13356 7,5SE.33 ;IT SCUThEkN CALIFL.KIA E.1-L% ;- LSIS 1,11 "KLA A. _ ,. UE�. ]�E> :35a 1 "21.6: 317 SOUTr.EHN LALIFCdhIA ICISLr. CE. %115 MEA.OH $1 ,inr:. 11 bS 1371( .23.,7 317 SOUTHERN GALI;CwNIA EDIiOk CC. 6(15 AFCNIEAL. '>ik IhiF 11.1s I'!SS 35 ?.7n / ` 6 -1I-L4 LIST OF RAFRANTS FNNLbU CL•CA -UNaA t", PAYEE IIEt 6cSCR wAr Ma A.k.,:: 1. 317 SOUTMEFN CALIFORNIA EOi SON C9. 319 SOU79EAN CALIFORNIA GA3 CJY.FANY 532 SPANGNCLAa SAr 33C STATIONERS C_nPCn +TICS 64C STEVENS, PIAE 634 SUNOERLANC PN[SS 614 ]ERA-0. IN. i26 THOMAS TEMP�nAFIEi 341 TRAMA -REST FC6C 1:u:1 372 7RIAC FHO7, 215 TURNER-_, INC 62C UGALA7r Sh ANAAR 553 UMIS1R6l LC3 AN:cLES 376 THE Ua AN LANC 1NS7110i 475 CARL RAAREN C CC US wEil COAST AN6CNISTS 629 WESIERh lHNICAIICN SUrrLY 362 MARY +hITh.V A65 D. WILLIAMS P�I`.IIN: 621 WILSON, IOA 302 RILSOt- bNYANI 371 23E MECICAL SoFV I,E 5161 BASELINE _ t1NEF 11CMO 133.: 55.1( 7211 uth'i ,.0 J nt. {1ErS raatl ?71.7: CLASS t.12 ::362 125.6 'FFICE S6FPLILS ., 7nEh IIEVE 13 ?t3 :9:.13 REFUND COh.l FSR :355 3"1 SIA'CA" CRAw1NL, 133E I,Cl1.2L tl 531 13 E`. 5 1lmt .22 SPIN :3311 31t.1c .ErJCLE L1a E ,T,EF IILM; li3[0 7(C.7e tOFFLER :337[:,E: A FUNI FE. CL-SSE: :3371 1..(C nIAC PARTS _ .IrEw il[:b 13z% A,5i,ac $HANEL PANNINC 1.i7: 1/,;: FALL _ _L ;R l7 Er: 13!11 I,CE[.3n IFEE .3N4 A,P,l 13A15 ll,c EE.6. SPRINMIER FARTS I"7t 21- ;I.IL7ES 3/3/t v .1 FEw li['o 13'17 v(. ^U KIN., 4FlGnl :.InE. II E'•F :337[ c9.t7 .EFUNG RE: CLASS 3 ?371 l:.at eLNIF ENLIN,. MAn_n `_U FLIES 1::1e1 t t t L �C , L" _cam w • CLAIM FOR D.vMV,GE OR INJURY 6z^.;g��;-- O Claims for death , injury to person, or to personal property must be filed not later than' 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). `' kB tE —� Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the occurrence (Gov. Code //, Sec. 911.2). ,.Q,,.a W. - -- - -- - - - - -. cftr of funcfw cucnMO►�ra �.. ;Cs> ,Gas �.: -� c�(I 5!' ADMINISTRATION rddress to /which Claimant wishes notices sent. MAY 4 soee WHEN did damage or injury occur?;/ '1 "llilf8l„I�I�1748141�18 WHERE did damage or injury occur'. `.( :n-L. r V' ..-�•• .;..,..,1-. f •lv.et.•�4- t.. --..+ HCPN and under what circumstances did damage or injury oc;,ut? kHAT particular action by the City, or its employees (Ipiude names of employees, if known) caused the alleged damage or injury? WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as it may be known at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed: iAttocl, estimates or bills, if possible) NAMES and oddresses of witnesses, Doctors and Hospitals: 51 � i O - A E 50 (478) signaturrif at aimonf Total Amount Claimed: NAMES and oddresses of witnesses, Doctors and Hospitals: 51 � i O - A E 50 (478) signaturrif at aimonf PHILIP PERDUE l•- AMV pEgOVE AMY MDUE FASHIONS • G.wvagT COgew,C,Ow. �r — ..:r_..St�. I� VICE "77259 anal ee>.z1DO 614e IHPOa,wl,l i,..,. CHECK 'dae`+e+a�aae w.LC..o c�c.HOwcn. c. n.., OUR PRICES IN •101ME �I�I:U� xe asr- +a'a DATE1T --,E ADDRESS ,ax lE er, Invl uw � nET'o uosE vAio ouT W.M 'TEMS MICE AMC IT 1]" BLACK 1]" BLACK 14 WHITE 15 ACK '5' Y'lHITE V I CHROME NI�EELS � C ER1 BAR Regisiration #AH34657 ALL TIRES ARE PRORATED: GUARANTEE IS VOID IF TIRE HAS BEEN TRUED. CLAIMS AND ADJUSTMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY TICKET. TAX /V\ NO CASH REFUND. REGISTRATION FORMS FURNISHED TOTAL RECEIVED BY .E e • • • • fRmv nC n 1 \in IIn 11 it 1 unvr 1 The attached resolution is for the approval of the final map for a 29 lot subdivision (second of two phases) at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Avenue. The project was approved by the Planning Commision on January 26, 1983 and consists of 116 condominiums on 8.9 acres. The bonds and agreement were previously approved by City Council on March 7, 1984. School letters were issued originally for the first phase covering the entire development. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the final map of Tract No. 12320 and authorizing City Clerk to sign the Map. Respectfully ssuub%miitt�ed, LBH:k1M: jaa Attachments STAFF REPORT x _ e z DATE: May 16, 1984 197' TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: John Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Map of Tract No. 12320 from Barclays -Terra for their project located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Avenue The attached resolution is for the approval of the final map for a 29 lot subdivision (second of two phases) at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Avenue. The project was approved by the Planning Commision on January 26, 1983 and consists of 116 condominiums on 8.9 acres. The bonds and agreement were previously approved by City Council on March 7, 1984. School letters were issued originally for the first phase covering the entire development. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the final map of Tract No. 12320 and authorizing City Clerk to sign the Map. Respectfully ssuub%miitt�ed, LBH:k1M: jaa Attachments E ------------- 27 21 i. 26 4, 19 • /V 18 21 LoT 8 24 22 2' 14 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANK)NUA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY _MAP A title; TRACT 12320 N page �a r.stablivhrd 1011: BOARD OF TRUStLLS pOBFRT S. FROST ROBLRI W. TA \(;L \:A♦ Mes. UZ GAL LARi::I AIRS. SANDRA ,\. UI,RLT JOIN C BOOR i Alta Loma ScAflool D strjct 73iO P n..whm- . PnN 01r." 8,,.:-41 . %I,., ...O. •)1'411 . Tru98 766 J011x t. AICM WipT Suprnnlrn0rnr FLOTD M.STORR I'rnunn.USupp.n Srmr _ Pchn:n 1'v 21, 19 °4 STACT\(LSON MILLI STRAIN C.A C.I.WSPKIW P q" r.l: ••:1;z OF a::rrn rc,vrrc:; rot+ :I In;ru, I>ISrarr ^r 1',.I nc rry Fur ReSidential Construction within �hc Alta Low,, School District. DEVELOPER Terra West Developme nt Ccmoanv _ TRACT M- P-IRER 12720 r.nr'ATION Southeast corner Archibald anal Victoria NU?ih ER OF DIIIA,I. ; UNIT'S llu_ multi- fanily units (condominium) ANTICIPATED CO:•IPr•RTION DATI: December 19a4 • Centlemen: Tho Alta Loma School District h;n•uhv rcrtific:; That the capacity for 34.8 student:; will bu provided within 24 months of the rompl et ion of t.hc above project. This certification is (riven on the condition that the State of California continues to LuIld the provisions of the Leroy F. Greene Lcase /Purghnsa Act of 1976, or any suc- cessor Act, in such manner, that the State Allocations Board may fund all school huildinl; projects undr -r its current rules and regulation:; withnul. priority points. The commitment of this caoacit;• shollexpire 90 uays from the date of this letter. of the final map or the, issuance of buildinq perr:it:: by Lhc City r)r i%InchO Cucamonga wlthtn that 90 (lay pl•rh,,i ;,hn;l volil:.ttr such <Ini'.itli Lmont. V{�-r^ t��ily ygnru. 1'Llyd ^, CI n1' Y. • Adnnni•.I i.il .n Po s,mn,.i •.11d aupport !;or•:iccs 311 6 cc: Planning Ui viaihn, Citl' All I!, utchu (:neamerrla p1a0.1 In uf}!15 /.[SAC 9 N 6t AIL n nCa. . v:111.1 S.Elvr ,inn a .aM1 1.y . ca(I,[ [n. n.a5 5 Vn N[IV . .auf5!!5 nap 5nM1V0 [a an \!t'. VFa I� • 's a, 1 February 24, 1984 Letter of Certif'_cation of school District CdpagitV tlitbin the Chaf_`ev Joint Union Pugh School District and the atrercance oouncar.es for the ...lcwLng descc_nec pro3ectu Locat'_on /Description: Tract No. 12320 Victoria E Archibald Rancho Cucamonga Number of Dwellings: 116 condominiums � Ant'_ pat_- Complet__n Date: December 1954 The school district herecv certifies that the capacity for is students will he provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the state of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease /Purchase Not of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date o`_ this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonaa within that 90 -day cericd shall validate such c^ :matte^'. by Dianne Alley Terra West Day. cc: ?lanninc et•: is.c r. (`��0',�1Lt� '05 E. 17th St. cf'Sar.cne C...... ^:c nca Suite 216 Santa Ana, CA 92701 r Dave Boucher l P. r 1 s CHAFFEY JOINT U`3103 HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 0 111 WUT "FT. ST11FfT. ONTAPIO. C.U*OWH 11742 n5f. om[ as [n ocan a fuorY na a \\aM1 C Suirn IOV[a r�V M1a\ t avi l CInTC• I I I an OMl , Va11 a5rr p1a0.1 In uf}!15 /.[SAC 9 N 6t AIL n nCa. . v:111.1 S.Elvr ,inn a .aM1 1.y . ca(I,[ [n. n.a5 5 Vn N[IV . .auf5!!5 nap 5nM1V0 [a an \!t'. VFa I� • 's a, 1 February 24, 1984 Letter of Certif'_cation of school District CdpagitV tlitbin the Chaf_`ev Joint Union Pugh School District and the atrercance oouncar.es for the ...lcwLng descc_nec pro3ectu Locat'_on /Description: Tract No. 12320 Victoria E Archibald Rancho Cucamonga Number of Dwellings: 116 condominiums � Ant'_ pat_- Complet__n Date: December 1954 The school district herecv certifies that the capacity for is students will he provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the state of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease /Purchase Not of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date o`_ this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonaa within that 90 -day cericd shall validate such c^ :matte^'. by Dianne Alley Terra West Day. cc: ?lanninc et•: is.c r. (`��0',�1Lt� '05 E. 17th St. cf'Sar.cne C...... ^:c nca Suite 216 Santa Ana, CA 92701 r Dave Boucher l P. r 1 s City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Deo_artment P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamcnl'a, California 91730 Attention: Barbara Krall Gentleman: Barclays- Terra, A General Partnership, Developer of Tracts No. 12320 and No. 12320 -1, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, has de- • posited with this District a Material and Labor Bond, a Faith- ` ful Percormance Bond, and a Utilities Improvement Agreement. These bonds and agreements are being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. In addition, this letter is to verify that the above referenced Developer has complied with all requirements for development that are mandated by District policy. Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Betty Fi[n Secrntary M RCSERT NELIFELD CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MICHA D .L - - • •- EAR RLS R ANDERSON BEVERLY E. 6RADEN VICTOR A. CHERSAN.:R P11.nr1 CHARLES A. WEST February 13, 1984 _.. . City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Deo_artment P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamcnl'a, California 91730 Attention: Barbara Krall Gentleman: Barclays- Terra, A General Partnership, Developer of Tracts No. 12320 and No. 12320 -1, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, has de- • posited with this District a Material and Labor Bond, a Faith- ` ful Percormance Bond, and a Utilities Improvement Agreement. These bonds and agreements are being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. In addition, this letter is to verify that the above referenced Developer has complied with all requirements for development that are mandated by District policy. Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Betty Fi[n Secrntary M RESOLUTION NO. Oi1&43!n A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12320 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12320 consisting of 60 units on 29 lots, submitted by Barclays- Terra, Subdivider, located on the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider offered an Improvement Agreement approved and executed by City Council on March 7, 1984 together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said rinal Map being the second of two phases, offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City C erk jaa Jon 0, tike s, Mayor • • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 16, 1984 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician Gl'Gi,1 {pt ,.> VIM SUBJECT: Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by Hillside Community Church for CUP 82 -29 located at 5354 Haven Avenue CUP 82 -29 was approved by Planning Commission on February 9, 1983 for the development of a church and related facilities on approximately 10 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue between Hillside Road and Carrari Street. The attached Lien Agreement is to guarantee future improvements of the street along the north property line. These improvements are to be constructed at the time of development of a permanent Sanctuary or when the property to the west develops. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Counil adopt the attached resolution approving said Lien Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Respectfully sub itted, T LBH� : jaa Attachments n u CITY OP RANCHO title; f•,NG,NEER,NG DI\'ISIOV 6w 7 --- 19771_r -' VICINITY ,MAP page. • RECORIIDIG REQUESTED BY: and WHEN RECORDED MAD. TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. Box 809 IIANCHOCLC.ASIONGd.C;1LIFORNIA 91700 REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN .AGREEMENT THIS AGREEyENT, made and entered into this day of , 19_, by and between T�- " •:: Gi iL: n:Fl: l:GU.fiSi (hereinafter referred to as "Developer'), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.110NGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'City'), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit for D. R. 82 -29, Hillside Communitv Church, the Citv requires the construction of missing off -site street improvements including curb. gutter. asphalt paving end • appurtenant work adjacent to the property to be developed; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such improvements unto n later date, as determined by the Cdy; and WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer fails or neglects to tlo so and that the City shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment due City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE.: 1. The Developer hereby agrees that they will install off -site street improvements including curb, gutter, nsphalt paving and appurtenant work in aeeordence and compliance with all applicable ordinances resolutions, rules and regulatiom of the City in effect at the time of the installation. Slid improvements shell be installed upon and along future.street located on northeriv property line of said project. 2, The installation of said improvement shall be completed no later than one (D year following written notice to the Developer from the (:try to commence • installation of the some. Installation of said improvements shall be at no expense to the • City. d. In the event the Developer shall fad or refuse to complete the installation of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete seid improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the Developer. 4. To ,secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and conditions of this .Agreement and to secure the repayment to City of any funds which may be expended by City in completing said improvements upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain. sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following described real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, to-wrt: Lot 1 of Showalter Subdivision in Use City of Sausalito Cucamongs, County of Sat Bernardino, State of California, as per mqr recorded in flask 19 of Maps, Page 75 in the Office of the Canty Recorder of said Canty. (201-101-25) 5. This conveyance is in trust for the purposes described above. 6. Now. therefore, if the Developer shall (pitifully perform all of the sets • and things to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shell be void, otherwise. it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall he governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7. This Agreement snail be binding open and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and emigres of each of the parties hereto, S. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the term "Developer" shall he "mortgagor" and the City slmll be the "mortgaged' as those terms are used in the lire Civil Code of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to mortages on real property. 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover arty sum which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to fnrvelase the mnrtgnge created hereby, then the prevnd/ng party shall be entitled to recover it, eosin and 11201 reusonahhe attorneys roes as shall he awarded by the Court. • 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2SLI6 -06CR • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH FOR CUP 82 -29 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, CUP 82 -29, located on the west side of Haven Avenue between Hillside Road and Carrari Street, submitted by Hillside Community Church was approved on May 16, 1984; and WHEREAS, Installation of curb, gutter, asphalt pavement and appurtenant work established as prerequisite to issuance of Building Permit has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Hillside Community Church. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1984. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authe et, City C1erK jaa Fj Jon 0. i, e s, Mayor 0 EI nT'V nV nnvnvnn n\11n\oe STAFF REPORT c� ;F 'Z DATE: May 16, 1984 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by Richard and Phyllis Newton for D.R. 83 -08 located on the north side of Foothill Blvd., east of Grove Avenue D. R. 83 -08 was approved by Planning Commission on May 11, 1983 for the development of a 3,858 square foot auto service building on ,37 acre of land. The attached Lien Agreement is for the future development of the median island on Foothill Blvd, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving said Lien Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and cause same to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder, Respectfully,)ubmitted, LBH:BK:jaa Attachments REJ H.LL COGNTRY CLUB . .... -- ----- -ic- "Icr W- 7 29 iii 2 25 3, 45 33 44 GD 52 M 42 .9 3 r7 M 41 49 50 1 3 . I � I I — ...... = I T-9. IS 37 M 39 90 w 51 16 SAN SEWRODIVO O o CITY ()I; RANCI I 0 CUCAN IONG tit[' 1: MAN EER ING A 49 DIVISION VI CI N I TY 1A 11 -----7- N pngo� RE CORDING REQUESTED BY: • and WHEN REC0RDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RAECHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT D.R. 83 -08 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19_, by and between 0. Richard Newton and Phyllis R. Newton (hereinafter referred to as - Developer -), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit for Development Review 83 -08 the • City requires the construction of missing off -site street improvements including one -half landscaped median island adjacent to the property to he developed; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such Improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and WHEREAS, the City Is agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said Improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said Improvements If the Develooer falls or neglects to do so and that the City shalt have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment due City. 1 t.i • HOW, 74EREFORE, T4E PARTIES AGREE: 1. The Developer hereby agrees that they will install of` -site street improvements including one -half landscaped median Island in accordance and COmDIi ante with all app l i tab le ordinances resolutions, rules and regulations of the City In effect at the time of the installation. Said improvements shall be installed upon and along Foothill Blvd. 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed no later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation Of said improvments shall be at no expense to the City. 3, to the event the Developer shall fail or refuse t0 complete the installation of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon • the property hereinafter described and complete said Improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the Developer. a. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and Conditions Of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City of any funds which may be expended by City in completing said Improvements upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following described real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit: Being a consolidation of the following described parcels: Lots 3 and 4, Tract Mo. 2521 Red Mill Estates Subdivision Mo. 2, as per plat recorded jn Book 35 of Maps, Pages 37 and 38, records of said County. Together with that portion of all of the alley(s) adjacent to said land as shown on Tract Mo. 2521, as recorded in Map Book 36, Pages 37 -38, County of San Bernardino, State of California, that - would normally pass by operation of law as vacated by Resolution No. 83 -130, a certified copy of which recorded as Document Mo. 83- 225182, September 27, 1983. • EXCEPT the southerly 10.00 feet as dedicated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street purposes. • 3 • S. This conveyance is in trust for the purposes described above. 6, now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void, otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and ooligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertsining to mortgages on real property. 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, Successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. 8. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the term -Developer shall be 'mortgagor- and the City shall be the ^mortgagee^ as those terms • are used in the the Civil Code of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to mortages on real property. 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the mortgage Created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its casts and "Ch reasonable attorneys fees as shall be awarded by the Court. • 3 RESOLUTION NO. D5-16 =076R • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RICHARD AND PHYLLIS NEWTON FOR- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -08 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Development Review 83 -08 located on Foothill Blvd., east of Grove Avenue, submitted by Richard and Phyllis Newton, was approved on May 16, 1984; and WHEREAS, Installation of one -half landscape median island established as prerequisite to issuance of Building Permit has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Richard and Phyllis Newton. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1984. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Aut e et, City Clerk jaa Jon 0. i e s, Mayor L • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 16, 1984 I'll TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: John Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement submitted by William and Dona Barnes for a single family residence at 12715 Summit located west of Etiwanda Avenue Mr, and Mrs. Barnes, property owners, have applied for a building permit to construct a dwelling unit on a piece of property at 12715 Summit Avenue. The property fronts upon unimproved Summit Avenue, an old portion of a public street. The access to the lot is provided from Etiwanda Avenue by Summit Avenue, presently dirt, with one existing house west of Etiwanda Avenue. As a prerequisite to issuane of a building permit for such parcels as established by City Council Resolution No. 80 -38, an irrevocable offer of dedication on their portion of the access for street purposes and a lien agreement for future improvements are required. Mr. and Mrs. Barnes have executed and entered into a lien agreement to provide required street improvements nt some future date to be determined by the City. The street dedication has been made. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and accept the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement on behalf of the City. Respectfully su�ub%// ttte�edd,�, LfH•J :jaa Attachments EiCA11C)1 c jf Im SITE TY OF RANCHO CUCANK ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP c, I A m- N page L z' It i ' i o:` �• � i �. a .r li R I 3 IC Ia. I 1 I a.c lea: 13 10 IS 16 o roniHLLNp AVENUE '.r EiCA11C)1 c jf Im SITE TY OF RANCHO CUCANK ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP c, I A m- N page RECORDING REQUESTED BY: • and "EN IN ECO RUED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CRY Of RANCHO :OCAHONDA P. 0, Box 307 RANCHO C'JCFMONGA, CAL IFORN 1A 91730 REAL PROPERTY IMPROYEMERT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEvENT, made and entered into this day of , 19_, by and between William C. Barnes and Bona C. Barnes (hereinafter referred to as -Developer"), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCA'40NGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as *City"I. provides as follows: WHEREAS. as a general condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit for a single f a m by residence at 12715 Summit Avenue, the City requires the construction of • missing off -site street improvements including curb, gutter, A.C. pavement, drive approach and street lights adjacent to the property to be developed; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer faits or neglects to do so and that the City shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's Performance, and any repayment due City. 0 1 NOM, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: 1, The Developer hereby agrees that they will inSta ii off -site street improvements including curb, gutter, A.C. Pavement, drive approach and street lights io accordance and Compliance with all applicable ordinanCOS resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time of the installation. Said improvements shall be installed upon and along Summit Avenue, 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed no later than one 11) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to Commence installation of the same. Installation of said improvments shall be at no expense to the City. • 1. In the event the Developer Shalt fail or refuse to complete the installation of Said improvements in a timely manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do to, enter upon the property hereinafter described antl complete said improvements and recover all Costs Of Completion incurred by the City from the Developer, 4, To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and Conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City of any funds whith may he expended by City in completing said improvements upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, Sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following described real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, Slate of California, to -wit: The West 112 of Lot 2, Block "0 ", according to the preliminary MAP of ETIWANOA COLONY LANDS, in the County of San NernardiAO, Stale of California, as per plat recorded to Book 2 of Maps, Page 24, records of said County. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the West 20 feet, ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the north 724 feet of the East 168 feet of said land, m� 2 r ' 0 5. This conveyance is in trust for the purposes described above. 6. low, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void, otherwise, It shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall he considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be aoverned by the provisions of the Civil Cade of the State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages an real property. 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. • e. To the extent required to 91 ve effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the term 'Developer' Seat be 'mortgagar' and the City shall be the -mortgagee- as those terms are used in the the Civil Code of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to mortages on real property. 9. If legal action is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the mortgage created hereby, then the prevai l leg party shall be entitled to recover Its costs and such reasonable attorneys fees as Shall be awarded by the Court. RESOLUTION NO. 05- 36 -12C9 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM 'WILLIAM AND DONA BARNES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 80 -38 on May 7, 1980, to establish requirements for landlocked parcels where no subdivision is occurring; and WHEREAS, 12715 Summit located west of Etiwanda Avenue is unimproved; and WHEREAS, 'William and Dona Barnes have executed a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1984. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa 0 I Jon D. Mike s, Mayor n L J • E — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 16, 1984 _ TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: John ;Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer `o �icasrptc 19]7 SUBJECT: Approval of a Storm Drain Easement Deed from Southern California Edison Company to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on 7th Street and Etiwanda Avenue The attached resolution is for the acceptance of a Storm Drain Easement over a portion of the land owned by the Southern California Edison Company on Etiwanda Avenue. The land being granted to the City is for the conveyance of storm flows under the recent widening of 7th Street west of Etiwanda Avenue. The construction of 7th Street was completed under the development requirements of the Pic -N -Sav warehouse. This document then will complete the necessary requirements for the 7th Street street construction. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Storm Drain Easement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Easement Deed and that the City Clerk forward the original to the County Recorder and a copy to Southern California Edison Company. Res�P,ctfully submitted, LBi4JM: jaa Attachments r. • POA,T /0�/ OF NE 114, 5EC. 17, T. /S., B. 6W., 5. B. Al. n 3L �I— i, 10 WIDE PIPEL'NE EASE MENT PER OR 27 5C -', 57 5 I••� /_`__ 589 °5G 37 "H 29000.,`, N00 °OJ 23'W 1200' 1 S LT LINE OF PARCEL 2 5 E COR,1L O 7 L $T. PCL 2 J CO 2C 0 40 90 SLALE Iv FEE' LEGEND aLANOSCF 5.0 E CC. STORM DRAIN EASEMENT TO CITY OF RANCHO CJCAtAONGA y .J 56102 A I w; aI I i V �I 3C -- I GI' I I I a 0 2 I w 4 rh J.0 M s 5498 I ETIWANDA GENERATING STATION MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WITIN LANDS DF S C CO. E Location: City of Rancho Cucamonga A.P.N. 229 - 283 -28 STORM DRAIN EASEMENT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter called "Grantor does hereby grant to CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "Grantee ", an easement for storm drain purposes, in, on, under, over, along and across that certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: A strip of land, 15.00 feet wide, lying within that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 17, Township 1• South, Range 6 West, San Bernardino Meridian, more particu- larly shown we Parcel 2, on Record of Survey Map, filed to Book 19, pages ] and 8 of Record of Surveys, in the office of the County Recorder of said County, the centerline of said strip of land, 15.00 feet wide, is described as follows: a Beginning at the Southeast corner said Parcel 2; West, thence South 89' 56' 37" West, 270,00 feetet , measured along the Southerly ine of said Parcel 2, to the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING of f this description; thence North 00' 03' 23" West, 12.00 feet. i e SUBJECT ti covenants, conditions, restrictions, leases ( v reser- vations, tit erceptffec encumbrances. rights, easements. leases q and licenses, affect, ng she above described real property or any limitOn thereof, whether of record or not, including but not limited to the following: An easement for pipeline purposes in favor of George F. Johnston, at us., recorded April 17, 1951 in Book 2750, page 157 of Official Records, in the office of the county Recorder of said County, The foregoing grant is made subject to the following terms Intl conditions: 1. The said Easemeot is granted subject to the right of Grantor to construct, intain. 'doe, operate, alter, add [o, r'.a rl replic , reconstruct, enlarge and /or remove in, on, aver, nder, throcgh, along and across the above described real property, electric tnnsmiss,ri and distribution lines and communication lines, together with supporting r,tructures and appurtenances, for conveying electric energy for light, heat, power and communication purposes, and pipelines and appurtenances for the transportation of oil, petroleum, gas, watn.r, or other substances, and conduits for ony am; all purposes. Storm Grain Easement City oGO., a £ Rancho Cuc amonga c Cuc b City Sen al 90. 57002A 2. Grantor shall not erect or place at any future tine any of.its facilities so as to interfere .its the rights of Grantee created by this Easement grant. 3. The said Easement shall be exercised so as not to endanger or interfere with the construction, mArhtaaacrg, use, operation, presence, repair, replacement, relocation, reconstruc- tion or removal of such electric Ct ansmissiOn, distribution or communication lines, pipelines, or other conduits. 4. The above described real property is to be used only for the purposes specified herein and in the event: (a) said real property is not he used (bl said real property shall be vacated as a storm drain right of wary; or 8. The rights hereby granted are not necessary or useful in the performance of the duties of said Grantor to the public. 9. Grantee agrees to maintain the above described real property in a condition satisfactory to 61antnr. lo. Any notice provided herein to be given by either party hereto to the other may be served by .lepclltirq in the united star,, post Office, postage prepaid, a sealed envelope ontauv ng a cep, of S.,h notice and addressed to said other party lc its principal place of bc","s. 11. By the acceptance hereof, the Grantee agrees to indemnify Grantor, 'to eflicprs, agents, and /or employees, from any and all tiabllity, loss, or damage to which Grantor, its officers, agents, arnl /or employees may be sus,Cted as the result of aby net it omission by Grantee, its officers, agents or employees arising out of the exe ccisrr by Grantee, its officers, agents, or employees, of any of the rights granted to it by this 1n9trtlmeet. -2- )c) the project for which this Easement is being granted is abandoned, the Easement shall thereupon, ipso facto, revert to and merge in the interest of Grantor in the above described real property. S. As a controlling part of the consideration for the execution and delivery Of this instrument by Grantor, the Easement is accepted upon and subject to the express condition that the improvement for which the Easement is given, regardless of the • time performed, and any other work or improvement commenced within two years from the date of recording of this Casement (.high improvement and other work or improvement are hereinafter sometime, collectively called "Improvement ") shall be done without any cost or expense whatsoever to Grantor. 6. Also as a controlling part of the consideration for the execution and delivery of this instrument by Grantor. Grantee covenants, for Itself, its successors and assigns, to construct and maintain the improvement to be located on the above described real property at its own expense. 9. Grantee hereby recognizes Grantor's title and interest in and to the above described real property and agrees never to assail or resist Grantor's title or interest therein. 8. The rights hereby granted are not necessary or useful in the performance of the duties of said Grantor to the public. 9. Grantee agrees to maintain the above described real property in a condition satisfactory to 61antnr. lo. Any notice provided herein to be given by either party hereto to the other may be served by .lepclltirq in the united star,, post Office, postage prepaid, a sealed envelope ontauv ng a cep, of S.,h notice and addressed to said other party lc its principal place of bc","s. 11. By the acceptance hereof, the Grantee agrees to indemnify Grantor, 'to eflicprs, agents, and /or employees, from any and all tiabllity, loss, or damage to which Grantor, its officers, agents, arnl /or employees may be sus,Cted as the result of aby net it omission by Grantee, its officers, agents or employees arising out of the exe ccisrr by Grantee, its officers, agents, or employees, of any of the rights granted to it by this 1n9trtlmeet. -2- storm brain Easement S.C.E. CO., a Corp., to City of Rancho Cucamonga Serial yo. 57002A 12. upon the termination or reversion of the rights herein granted, Grantee shall at its own risk and expense remove said facilities and restore said above described real property as nearly as possible to the same state and condition that it was in prior to any construction of said facilities, but if it should fail to do so within sixty fe0) days after such termination, Grantor may do so at the risk of Grantee, and all cost and expense of such removal and the restoration of said premises as aforesaid, together with interest thereon at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum shall be paid by Grantee upon demand. 13. The use of the neuter gender herein will, when appropriate, be construed to mean either the masculine or feminine gender or both. Unless expressly provided elsewhere, herein to the contrary, the terns, covenants and conditions of this Easement inure to the benefit of and are binding upon the heirs, successors, representatives and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Southern California Edison Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed hereto and this instrument to be executed by the Manager of Right of Way q# Land and ASSiA cant ec retary, t unto duly authorized this day of , 19 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY • Eyn, Jr. Manager of Right of Way a and BY Assistant Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby accept the above and foregoing Easement upon and subject to all of the terms, covenants and conditions therein contained, and does hereby agree to comply With and perform each and all of said terms, cove manta and conditions. DATED as of this day of _! 19__ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By By RESOLUTION No. 95= 1f5 =IiER • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR 7TH STREET WEST OF ETI'WANDA AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, a Parcel Map was approved and recorded with the condition to construct 7th Street west of Etiwand Avenue; and WHEREAS, perpetuation of existing storm drain flows :oust be considered through Southern California Edison Company property on 7th Street west of Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, Southern California Edison Company has provided the City with a Storm Drain Easement over the land north of 7th Street on Edison property. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Storm Drain Easement be and the same is hereby approved and that the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign same Storm Drain Easement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and that the City Clerk attest thereto and the City Clerk shall then forward the original to the County Recorder and a copy to Southern California Edison Company. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Autne et, City C err jaa 17J Jon D. Mikels, Mayor 0 STAFF REPORT DATE: May 15, 1934 TO: :1embers of the City Council and City Manager FROM: lack Lam, Community Development Director �. � ^ "t,! IF _ 2 19197 SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF CRITERIA FOR LE ^10111G AGENCIES FOR THE 1984 RES i3EATIAL i10RTGAGE REVENUE 30NDDPROGRAil BACKGROUND: In expectation of the passage and signing of Federal egis.ation extending the law enabling housing mortgage bonds, staff, with authorization from the participating developers, is preparing the necessary application for private lending agencies who wish to participate in the 1984 Bond program. It is necessary, pursuant to Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code, to establish minimum eligibility requirements which lending institutions must meet in order to participate. The attached Resolution, prepared by the Mortgage Programs Bond Counsel of Jones, Hall, Hill and White, is similar to the previous S8 99 bond issue resolution and identifies the three necessary criteria. Briefly, these are as follows: A. The lender has had significant past and present experience in funding mortgages financed by revenue bonds or has serviced conventional loans for the participating developers; B. The lender shall be a Federal National Mortgage Association or a Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation approved sellerlservicer; and, C. The lender must confine its servicing fee to the lowest possible rate, but, in any event, the fee cannot be greater than the formula established by the Bond Counsel. A list of local lending institutions, as well as those which have expressed an interest, is being prepared. Upon adoption of the Resolution establishing the participation criteria, applications will be mailed to these lending agencies and the qualified lender(s) will be chosen. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Adoption of Criteria /Lending Agencies May lo, 1984 Page 2 RECOMME9DATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution establ.ishing the minimum criteria for the lending agencies for the 1984 Single Family Residential Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. Respectfully bmitted, JAC Directo r of Community Development JL:T3:jr Attachment: Resolution • • • RESOLUTION N0. - SCR A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPATION BY LENDERS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOME MORTGAGE FINANCING PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City ") proposes to undertake a home mortgage financing program (the "Program ") pursuant to Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (the "Act ") for persons and families within the income limits established by the Act, and proposes to issue revenue bonds pursuant to the Act to provide funds for the Program; and, 'WHEREAS, the Act requires that home mortgages be financed with the proceeds of such revenue bonds shall be originated and serviced by lending institutions (the "Lenders ") approved by the City for participation in the Program; and, 'WHEREAS, Section 52020(b) of the Act further requires the City to establish criteria for participation by Lenders on an equitable basis; and • 'WHEREAS, the City, with the aid of its staff, has selected the following described criteria for participation by Lenders in the Program, which criteria the City hereby determines to be an equitable basis for such participation. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, as follows: 1. A Lender shall be eligible to participate in the Program of the City if Lender meets the following requirements: (a) The Lender shall have originated and shall be now servicing a significant number of mortgages financed by revenue bonds issued by the State of California or by counties, redevelopment agencies or other cities within the State or shall otherwise be qualified by reason of having originated and serviced conventional loans for Program builders; (b) The Lender shall be a Federal National Mortgage Association or a Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation approved seller /service; and Resolution No. Page 2 • (c) The Lender must agree to originate and service home mortgages at the lowest cost which is in the best interests of the mortgagor, which shall, in any event, be a fee of not more than one -half of one percent (1/2 of 1 %) of the initial principal amount of the applicable home mortgage and an annual fee to service_ home mortgages of not more than one -fifth of one percent (1/5 of 1 %) of the declining principal balance of the applicable home mortgage. 2. The City Clerk shall cause a notice of the City's intent to select one or more lenders to participate in the Program, and of such criteria, to be published once in The Daily Renort, 3. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that it intends to select one or more lending institutions (the "Lender ") to originate and service Home Mortgages to be purchased with the proceeds • of its Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds to be issued to provide funds for the City's Home Mortgage Financing Program (the "Program "). The City has established the following criteria for selection of Lenders for its Program: (a) The Lender shall have originated and shall be now servicing a significant number of mortgages financed by revenue bonds issued by the State of California or by cities, redevelopment agencies or other counties within the State or shall otherwise be qualified by reason of having originated and serviced conventional loans for Program builders; (b) The Lender shall be a Federal National Mortgage Association or a Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation approved seller / servicer; and (c) The Lender shall agree to originate and service home mortgages at the lowest cost which is in the best interests of the mortgagor, which shall, in any event, be a fee of not more than one -half of one percent (1/2 of 1 %) of the initial principal amount of the applicable home mortgage and an annual fee to service home mortgages of not more than one -fifth of • one percent (1/5 of 1 %) of the declining principal balance of the applicable home mortgage. Resolution No. Page 3 Further information, together with appropriate application forms, may be obtained by interested lenders from City Hall, Planning Division, P.O. Box 807, 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. City C1erK 4. The City Clerk shall also cause a copy of such notice to be mailed to all lenders who she believes transacts business within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, .APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • ATTEST: Jon D. I4ike s, Mayor Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk /jr .3 0 • `0 MEMORANDUM,, Date: May 10, 1984 To: City Council and City Manager From: Dick May. R2sriner Subject: Approval of Final Plans and Specifications for the Bear Gulch Place, Arrow Route and Arrow Park Grading Improvements and Authorization to Advertise for Construction Rids The final plans and specifications for the street improvements for Bear Gulch Place and Arrow Route and for the grading improvements to Arrow Park have been completed for construction bid solicitation. In order to provide adequate vehicular access to Bear Gulch Elementary School prior to it's opening next September, it is necesGary for the City Council to approve the project plans and specifications and authorize the advertisement for construction bids for the above mentioned road improvements. As the grading plan for the proposed Arrow Park site has also been completed and some of the street improvements, such as road frontages, sidewalks and parkway areas, would affect the park grading, we believe it best to include the actual park grading and drainage work with the street improvements. This way the park construction can begin sooner and the City can take advantage of potentially lower construction bids by combining the two construction activities. The remaining park construction is anticipated to begin concurrent with or shortly after the completion of the grading and street improvements. With the authorization to solicit construction bids, it is anticipated that the construction contract will be awarded to the lowest qualified bidder in mid June, 1984 with the contract to be completed by August 15, 1984. The estimated cost for this construction is $110,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: That the City Council approve the final plans and specifications for the Bear Gulch Place, Arrow Route and Arrow Park grading improvements and authorize the solicitation for construction bids. L J — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA3I0 \GA STAFF REPORT DATE: may 16, 1984 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician C C,a.1tc)4 t > 1977 S033ECT: Set Public Hearing for June 20, 1984 to form Landscape Maintenance 9istric: No. 5 for the open space area within Tract 11915 -1 located at the northeast corner of Turner and 26th Street LeBrett Homes, Inc., developer of Tract 11915 -1 a subdivision of 44 units located at the northeast corner of Turner Avenue and 26th Street, has requested the formation of a landscape maintenance district for the open space areas within the project, The units within the district will be assessed for the open space areas with the City being responsible for the maintenance. All improvements will be installed by the developer. The areas to be maintained are shown on Exhibit "A" of the Engineer's Report. Total annual maintenance costs are estimated as follows: Per open space and tot lot $0.30 x 24,000 s.f. = 57,200 Per unit annual assessment $7,200 - 44 = $163.64 Pre unit monthly assessment 5163.64 - 12 = 513.64 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions initiating and forming Landscape Maintenance District No. 5, approving the City Engineer's Report, and setting the public hearing for June 20, 1984. Respectfully sub fitted, LB • K:jaa Attachments • 2102 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE. SUITE 151 IRVINE, CA 92715 [714] 833 -2014 March 23, 1994 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 -C Base Line Road :Yi C'q0 �;;;;r•xi:6C:, Rancho Cucamonga, Ci. 91730 :': G:'.l�Ldll:i ATTN: Barbara RD: Landscape Maintenance District - Tract 11915 -1 Dear Barbara: Lebrett Homes Inc. hereby requests the formation of a Landscape Maintenance District to include the open space areas of Tract 11915 -1. Sincerely yours, Peter R. Hubinuer President PRH:1 jh r i ;, RESOLUTION 10. O-�j.6 -08CR A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATIJN OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets and Highways Code authorizes this City Council to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to improve and maintain open space and tot lot located therein; and ''WHEREAS, this City Council declares to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 5" to improve and maintain open space and tot lot located within the boundaries of said landscape maintenance district. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby proposes the formation of an assessment istrict to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 5" pursuant to the Landscaping and Lightino Act of 1972. SECTION 2: The nature, location and extent of the improvements to be installed and maintained with "Landscape Maintenance District No. 5" are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The location and extent of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 is ­more described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein, and tha City Council hereby specifies the designation "Landscape Maintenance District No. 5" for said landscape maintenance district. SECTION 4: The City Engineer is hereby authorized an directed to cause the preparation and filing of a report with respect to the formation of Landscape Maintenance District in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the California Streets and Highways Code. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ® ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa on D. Mi e s, Mayor EXHIBIT "B" Lot A, B and C of Tract 11915 -1 as recorded in Book 172, Pages 13 -15, Of MaD5, records of San Bernardino County, State of California. • • i1 L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description The report deals with the establishment of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Area to be included in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagram. The total area being 720,700 square feet (open space), and a tot lot located on Lot C and consisting of 3,300 square feet. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District, are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any parkway and tot lot improvement. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all units in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. • SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the parkway, open space and tot lot are to be prepared by the developer. The plans and specifications are as stipulated in the conditions of approval and as approved by the City Engineer and City Planning Commission. Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract Nap and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscape area. The plans and specifications for landscape improvements on the individual lots are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. 0 Detailed maintenance activities include: The repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, to include landscaping, and tot lot, providing for life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and tot lot equipment. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No casts will be incurred for improvement construction. All improvements • will be constructed by developers. Based on data from other cities, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) per square foot per year per open space and tot lot. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 comprised of 44 units and per unit costs are shown: Total Annual Maintenance Cost: Open Space and Tot Lot 0.30 x 24,000 = 7,200 Per Unit Annual Assessment 7,200 divided by 44 = 163.64 Per Unit Monthly Assessment = 13.64 Assessment shall apply to each unit as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached Assessment Diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A ". SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for for the entire district is found to be of general benefit • to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to form a District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council, 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. • -b RESOLUTION N0. 09 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA'1ONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 WHEREAS, on May 16, 1984, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: _ SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses oT said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in saiTAssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for to e purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. n RESOLUTION NO. 05 -}i- -- CR • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, on May 16, 1984, this City Council adopted Resolution No. * proposing the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 5" for the purpose of maintaining certain landscape and improvements to be located within said assessment district; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 1984, this City Council preliminary approved an Engineer's Report with respect to said "Landscape Maintenance District No. 5" and caused said Engineer's Report to be filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, this City Council desires to form Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 for the maintenance of certain landscape improvements to be located herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: • SECTION 1. This City Council hereby declares its intention to order the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 5" for the purpose of maintaining certain landscape improvements therein and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 2. The landscape improvements to be maintained within the boundaries of Landscape Maintenance District No.5 are more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. The general location of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 is :pore particularly described on the diagram attached at "Exhibit B" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a full detailed description of the boundaries of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and of land within said assessment district. SECTION S. This City Council hereby sets the date, time and place of a public Rear,— on the formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 to be as follows: DATE: June 20, 1984 • TIME: 7:30 pm PLACE: City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line Road. City of Rancho Cucamonga SECTION 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby • authorize aan3� irected to cause a certified cony of this Resolution to be published at least once, ten (10) days before the date set for said public hearing in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario a�rculated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City Clerk is also authorized and directed to cause a Notice of Public Hearing to be sent by first class mail to those persons who names and addressess appear on the last equalized county assssment roll or the State Board of Equalization Assessment roll with respect to the real property to be included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 5. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk jaa • rI L ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM . LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 17 IB dg 20 21 J''22 �� 23 �28 +,_!: i'1' .. ,.27 r , !! P k. °� `ii d,1 �1, >•2!� %q.'S • e n' ....4'1A ..... - 'i? tit kkl. I6 IS 14•`iV 13 12 ! �� r .. II i,l M! 32 IO 9 �•' 1 3 33 ti {t ,! .a � a� • o It s'a a 'fi I �,.;, .•> • 7 34,j za ^ G'ONLORO OR /V8 "' qi ."''� �•.-S: { k -� 44 A' N't i� 9 lei t ° ,�q y { .4 I: Li 39 !. lid sir. 43 V' 42 41 40 `I_ ,0 39 37 c. w CITY OF ItANCI10 CUCr \ \10NGA � TRACT 11915 -1 ENGINEERING DIVISION yivn � \'ICINITI' , X11: \P r R � z r� u • r 1 U CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May lo, 1984 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing for Annual Assessment for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Attached is the City Engineer's Annual Report and a Resolution declaring the City's intention to levy and collect assessments and setting a public hearing for June 20, 1984 for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The annual assessment has been reduced from last year's assessment of 543.00 per lot to $38.00 per lot for this year. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolutions, giving preliminary approval of the City Engineer's Annual Report and setting a public hearing on June 20, 1984 to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Res gctfully submitted, V / LBH:bc Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1984 -85 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. SECTION I. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION Z. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The report deals with the actual costs for Fiscal Year 1983 -84 and the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1984 -85 of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Areas to be included in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. The total area of said parkways being 377,077 square feet. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District area: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration of any parkway improvement. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be • divided on a per lot basis. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 9 Parkway improvements were constructed by the developers for the individual subdivision parkways. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each subdivision and as approved by the City Planning Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscape areas. The plans and specifications for landscape improvement on the individual tracts are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the enumerated parkway areas include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair, and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. SECTION 4. Due to the general deterioration, vandalism or loss various parkways • within the District will be renovated, repaired and replanted at an estimated cost. of $26,452.46. Based on historical data adjusted for inflation, it is estimated that maintenance cost for assessment purposes will equal seventeen cents (5.17) per square foot for the fiscal year 1984 -85. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data, 1983 -84 Estimated Assessment Costs $.17 x 223,396 square feet = $37,977.32 537,977.32 = $42.58 ($43.00) �s 1983 -84 Actual Cost Summary 83 -84 Actual Parkway Maintenance Costs Utilities $6,480.60 City Labor & Adm. 852,08 Contract Maint. 19,882.36 Need Control 263.79 TOTAL $27,478.83 Actual Assessment ($33,356.00) less Actual Cost ($ 27,478.83) + 83 -84 • Restoration Carryover ($15,575.29) _ $26,452.46 CARRYOVER FOR 84 -85 RESTORATION 1984 -85 Estimated Assessment Cost. $.17 x 377,077 square feet = $64,103.09 SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed Master Assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeid "Exhibit A ". Detailed diagrams of each tract are included. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. Lot dimensions are as shown on individual Tract .Maps as shown in records of County Recorder. TOTAL ASSESSABLE LOTS 1983 -84 = 1687 • ANNEXATION SUM4ARY • TRACT NO. OF LOTS *ASSESSABLE 11734 96 0 12184 32 0 12019 35 35 12020 28 28 12021 33 33 12022 36 36 12023 33 33 12024 34 34 12025 40 0 11173 70 70 11173 -1 47 47 11144 62 62 12090 128 128 12237, 12237 -1, 12237 -2 86 0 12305 59 0 10277 -1 8 0 11013 30 0 12320 -1 56 0 11797 240 0 9399 12 0 9400 12 0 12414 92 0 • 11915 -1 44 0 11549 -1 27 0 O.R. 83 -17 68 0 12362 88 0 12026 24 0 12027 30 0 11663 13 0 Total Lots 1480 506 NOTE: Only annexed Tracts 60% occupied shall be included for assessment purposes. TOTAL ASSESSABLE LOTS 1984 -85 = 1687 SECTION 6, ASSESSMENT Improvement for the entire district are found to he of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. it is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District, ASSESSEMENT = $64,103.09 divided by 1687 lots = $37.99 ($38.00) 9 RESOLUTION NO. 86 —+6-e4 R A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO • CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10. 1 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvement of said Landscape Maintenance District No. 1: and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: • 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1984 -85 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this * day of * • • t � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA is 9 /7 /0 /G // 1$ /2 14 /3 BANYAN ST. Filed in the Office of the City Clerk W Q O J Q u a a i this , day of 97).� LEGEND — Asses,ment District Boundary ��+Lmdsca ping City C1crK Area LI I 1-- TRACT 92(5 7 I <nr .nynnr cc..nw ay. � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE' OF CALIFORNIA 5 5/ 50 S'9 4B M RNZFjN /Tq OR, y7 W 20 Zl 22 23 21, \5� C > H ti N ti W Q 19 I /B I 17 /b I IS SUNFLOWER SL i v 2° W 1 h W n /y /3 12 i y� 10 GS �9 7 9 P G m Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. —� erh E. • LEGEND — Assessment District Boundary �Landscaping Area :v. I TRACT 9268 I 10F 2 Q 0 • I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN 13ERNAR OIN0 STATE' OF CALIFORNIA Ff th isC in tte Office o? the City Clerk 19i:. day of r V a W e LEGECD �Assessrent District +7 "„"� Landscaping Area ounda ry TRACT 9268 2 F 2 i v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF, SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA W/L S O.Y AVE. L \9 3B 37 \X11 4l W 36 30 Y� Z 35 I JI al 43 rJ I 34 731 cc, 70,yr,,QO ( Filed in the Of`ice of the City Clerk this day 979. Cl ty CierY, l 1� W 20 25 ¢ 24 Z3 21 O J a m i /B LEGEND — :Assessment District Boundary ■� Landscaping Area • TRACT s 92G9 /oF 2 ...., >,,. ,d. 4 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF . CALIFORNIA N( h Z Q W e W/L SCA/ AVE. I i vi ve 2 so W 4 zz = vs J Q Lill. _.. C C VwcoC wAy Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of LEGEND 197?. — Assessrent District Boundary �Landscaping Area F �j 3 TRACT 9269 2OF2 a 1-1, . m 6`w. B s 6 7 H 9 /e Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of LEGEND 197?. — Assessrent District Boundary �Landscaping Area F �j 3 TRACT 9269 2OF2 a 1-1, . m 6`w. B s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM • LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE -OF CALIFORNIA Filad in the Dffice of the City Clerk this day of 1979. ty LEGEND —Assessment District 3uundary � Landscaping Area TRACT 9306 I l OF 2 cnr mpmur tcr. uru aac ,J a I I L/r C cc/na DA \I Fly/ YO h 25 /5 I H2 39 26 /Y Q Q V.5 36 2) Q F v m /3 j Q U Y9 37 20 Q v Filad in the Dffice of the City Clerk this day of 1979. ty LEGEND —Assessment District 3uundary � Landscaping Area TRACT 9306 I l OF 2 cnr mpmur tcr. uru aac ,J 0 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA /Z J e ,o z Q U) J 6 7 HS I j6 I 46 35 47 3Y 4H 33 Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. ere 0 L 1 ory �ny�ur r.c�. nw ar 1 e W e ST. Q LEGEND —Assessment District Boundary 400� Landscaping Area TRACT 9306 c. 2 F 2 8 Q 2 � Q LEGEND —Assessment District Boundary 400� Landscaping Area TRACT 9306 c. 2 F 2 8 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN RERNARDIN NARDINO STATE - OF CALIFORNIA Fii ^d in the Office of the City Clerk this _ day of 19i ?.— N sF, LEC..;D — Assessr•!ent Ui;irirt kundary . I.andscaping Area .•n .ngmor r,a•. nu. au. A PJ TRACT 935/ E � � w z CL Q. Q A& 5 /OF 2 A or 0 • • T 0 0 W � f U _ C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i •� COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA u U d a+ w y ti �u 'r' O �L C n a N L V 61 - Ci 1 l� u i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CAI.;FORNIA c 96 95 94 i 93 192 � 91 4v � 39/ /y II 2 O AaNGE SL L17 /S S/ 9 rr l b s 2e �• 21 � p(, BRlSTJL OA. W m /9 za 21 22 23 2v Q Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 197;. Ct LESP;D I —Assessment District Boundary � Landscaping Area • I TRACT 9402 6 ulr �n pn�o r.a�.um awe /�� 0 • 0 u J V_ O _ a C � _ I — I .n c LL � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 i v' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO n° STATE OF CALIFCRNIA ., I 0 C !0 — W � \ w H N 9 &RIY6L 9 4 f ' I _ 2T TRACT 9403 I 7 14 Zp LL e I 4Z c4 — 11 LvlvE Y — 2l 10 i !I Z0 31 �I 3o ¢ 31 a I'I 33 L TRACT 9403 I 7 CITY hl 4r e OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE - OF CALIFORNIA / I 2 > 5 19 e a a/ 2 6 7 2 ki • PO?LfiR 57'REZ7 2 I � W 1 v $ I I I .. 29 z® 27 26 25 L � � 2Y 23 WILSON Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this _ day of 1971. �iorr. AVI5. LLGLIiD —Assessment District Boundary lw �Landscaping Area . TRACT 0430 I 1 of 2 A 0 is s PO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE 'OF CALIFORNIA W If �t I WILSON /7yE. Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this _ day of 197:. c7 ��ere W 1 Q Z LEGEND --- Assessrent District Boundary �Undscapin9 Area ob •npmur r.c.�. r+w aau T'PA C / 9430 I20F 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA —lL_ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 24 2s 2�I j 27 Z j Q 28 29 30 Q v Q 31 V' 32 Filed in the Oi °ire or thr. City Clark this day or 1977. b City Clarr. • LECEID Assessment District Ooundary �Llndsca Pinq ,1raa ,I .... >>.,. .v.I TRACT 9434 I 9 0 • a � t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Filed in the Office of the City Clerk I this day of I V 9i ?. -- City Cim �J ✓i '/ 3 /2 / a 5 /5 /O � 2 /b 9 e y 777 w- a z i 2s 25' 27 20 23 21 22 r2u LEGECD — 4ssessment District Boundary � L:mdscapinq Area TRACT 9436 ur/ •n9���u r.c.�. nw T , /O 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Z -- - -- e 7 /6 15 1 /Y 1B /9 io • _J x 9 2 z8 23 of 5 U . r\ ib/ 25i L4 Fiind in the Offic, of the City Clerk this day of 1979.— LE GEIiD —Assessment District Boundary �Landscaping Area • TRACT 9437 cnr m�n.v r,cn. um au. ^ ..f E • \ J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Cb Z —Z5 I� ti i ti 2 I n4 71-3 2 i 3L 3 10 I j -' ¢ /4 4 ti1�33 � 9 a z7 V tic i ¢ S 5 )Y � 6 C; tip 6 7 /6 BANYAN s /7 3,5" 37 20 /9 18 )� Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. erk 9 1 LEGEND Assessment District Boundary Landscapinq Area TRACT 9444 I 12 ury mymu Gu, mp .v. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE 'OF CALIFORNIA 1 '/ Ya i 39 1 '�, 37 ' 36 � 35 i 3Y 133 W2 Y3 BURSUNOY %VE. 3/ P Q 50 Q 5a 61 vs Y9 L�SI 5Y 57 60 lj 557 j S9 59 nnCMB FLD yy8;4'U� 29 36 Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this _ day of 1979. i �4�11 7 26, 25 2Yi 23 122 Lf 20 19 ' /B dURGU•vOY RVE. ti k w, 3 �9 9 /0 /5 U R 2 a z I B O // /Y � N 9RC,11d]i40 RVE,S'uE LEGEND — •lssessment District Boundary Landscaping Area • <v, I TRACT 9445 l /3 G E CITY �UF RANCHO CUCA'MONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 �f II W 2 7 5 � b W 7 Z Q� se it ye y/ C n 52 R 17 yP F TSb 53 l y 4b 43 a 4 5 i5 Sv y5 yY 4.7 YINE !9 30 f` 29 h 38 3/ Ze !7 I 3z 27 36 33 p 26 35 l 3Y •�> Ls STREE B I 9 1(0 l j 11 112 I Ix I M I I I5 I Ib 117 I IB 119 120 121 122 i 17 21 So urRERN PeuG /CI R. R RN / I_ Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 197). City G1erI'• LEDEIID — Assessment District Boundary C i Landscaping Area TPA CT 9454 14 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE -OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 J L rJ u J n 2 T u 0 u W o n PI —aa; \ 3G 5J 52 J7 35 54 51 JB 34 55 50 39 33 56 Q 49 I 40 Q 32 57 48 I 4/ 3l 47 I 42 O JO Lo 59 ` 46 43 --1 29 GO 45 09 28 HEATHER ST Q { RING AVE m 1 1 2 J J 5 G 7 B f9 f" ST C TRACT 9472 ( 15 [19 it 20 21 22 23 124 25 26 127 is 17 16 l5 14 13 K if 0 Q { RING AVE m 1 1 2 J J 5 G 7 B f9 f" ST C TRACT 9472 ( 15 0 • 9 CITY CJ OF RANCHO ASSESSMENT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CUCAMONGA DIAGRAM DISTRICT NO. t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTYV OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE "OF CALIFORNIA BASEL I'JF sJI JAI a"/I lBl 1p 41 :Y .)I ltl ll'3a L9L . 43 t5 dill v9 ¢ tis A\ 3V I II I t 9i I 9d \ld�n,lB'!9 U 51 bIv Bl9 sz pia ! 55 � SY Filad in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1971. cy I,IeYY. r`I till .1..r ..C... l.l.l LESE :lD —Assessment District Boundary � I.andscaping Area TRACT 9480 /G d ADDITIONAL MAPS AS DESCRIBED IN THE ENGINEER'S REPORT ARE ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. If you wish to look at them or have copies made, please notify my office. • Beverly Authe let City Clerk C� J �- r • • is :/ . RESOLUTION N0. BFF�5-02 CR A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS '![THIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND-LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Oescriotion of 'Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for the fiscal year 1984 -85 for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said District. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures and walls in connection with said parkways. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within roadway rign�Tvay and landscaping easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District No. I ". Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 111, indicating by said boundary line the extent of the territory included 'within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and more particular description of said assessment district, and the said map so on file shall govern for all details as t.o the extent of said assessment district. Report of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has • approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearin SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 20th day of June, 1984, at the hor of 7:30 o.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and ail persons may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1984 -85. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the Hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 • SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7; Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, a i ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16 day of %lay, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Aut e et, ,ty err jaa 0 Jon D. Mikels, Mayor • 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 16, 1984 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing for Annual Assessment for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria) Attached is the City Engineer's Annual Report and a Resolution declaring the City's intention to levy and collect assessments and setting a public hearing for June 20, 1984 for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2. The annual assessment for residential unit is $223.77. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolutions, giving preliminary approval of the City Engineer's Annual Report and setting a public hearing on June 20, 1984 to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2. Respectfully submitted, LBH:b Attachments • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 84 -85 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER (Victoria) L J SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Street and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION This report deals with the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1984 -85 of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for the Victoria Planned Community. The District includes the majority of the area as included within the planned community, as approved by Ordinance No. 143, including the Victoria linear park, the trees within the dedicated tree maintenance easement, the trees and ground cover within the tree and ground cover maintenance easements dedicated to the City, the public parks, and other areas required by the Planned Community plan or by the City Council, or as dedicated by the various subdivisions. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration of landscape improvements. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall be divided on a per lot basis. SECTION 3. PLANS AMU SPECIFICATIONS (SCOPE OF WORK) The existing landscape improvements were constructed by the developer for the Victoria Planned Community. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval and as approved by the Community Development Department. Detailed maintenance activities on the landscaped improvements include: The repair, removal or replaremnt of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease orinjury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Construction of remaining landscape improvements, including parks, parkways, paseos, etc,, as required by the Planned Community plan or by the City Council will be constructed by developer at the expense of the District. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS Stage One Construction • The estimated maintenance cost (at current dollars) for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for Tracts 11934 and 12044 comprising 300 units is shwon below: Victoria Park Lane, 198,881.82 sq. ft. X $0.33/sq. ft. _ $65,631.00 Trees 300 x $5 /Tree - 1,500.00 Total 1984 -85 Annual Maintenance Cost �T1 - 0 The estimated construction cost of future landscaping for vacant land comprising of 1958.78 acres at 1/4 assessment is $111,101.83. TOTAL ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION COST = $178,232.83 SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed boundary map and legal description of the Assessment District are attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A" and "Exhibit B ". Copies of recorded map of Tract 11934 and 12044, showing areas to be maintained by the District, are hereby incorporated into the text of this report. Precise lot dimensions are included in the referenced tract maps and Assessor's records. SECTION 6. ASSESSMENTS Maintenance costs for the entire district are found to be of specific benefit to al� lots within the District and tha assessment shall be equal for each parcel. 1984 -85 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT = $67,131.00 divided by 300 lots = $223.77 1984 -85 VACANT LAND ASSESSMENT = 1958.78 acres at 1/4 Assessment per acre = $111,101.83 • �r RESOLUTION N0.- 45—t6=0TCR • A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvement of said Landscape Maintenance District No. 2; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: • 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1994 -85 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. V F.• a Q, .mtl ci A J� _ it _ •:;I ; i I I 1 1 1 SCALE 1 1',2000. _ _'r�� :��, _ i �i _ .�, :i • T�'T VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT EXHIBIT 'A RE` /[SEC) 5 -19 -82 1' 1-09-32 VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE . DISTRICT EXHIBIT "9" THOSE PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 31 AND 32 IN TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE TOWNSHIP PLAT APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED NOVE1'BER 13, 1955 TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE TOWNSHIP PLAT APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED JUNE 20, 1884 TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF SECTIONS S AND 6 IN TOWNSHIP I SOUTH, RANGE 6 'WEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE TOWNSHIP PLAT APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED APRIL 19, 1884 AND THAT PORTION OF • ECTION 8 TC'WNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 'WEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERI- DIAN ACCORDING TO THE TOWNSHIP PLAT APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED NOVEMBER 3, 1873, ALL IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8, DISTANT EASTERLY 60 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NCRTHERLY ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT EASTERLY 60 FEET FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 1650 FEET OF SAID `IORTH'AEST QUARTER; THENCE 'WESTERLY 50 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY TO THE WESTERLY LIME OF SAID SEC710 >1 3; T:4E(:E `lORTHERLY ALONG SAID 'dESTERLY LINE TO THE '40R7H'WE5T CCRf;ER OF SAID SECTION d; THENCE wSTERLY 310 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTICN 6; THENCE NORTHERLY Iof8 l l VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT EXHIBIT "B" ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WfTH AND DISTANT WESTERLY 370 FEET FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT I OF TRACT NO. 8369, RECORDED IN BOOK 118, PAGES 36 TO 39 OF MAP BOOKS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE WESTERLY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 8369, THE EASTERLY LINE OF TRACT NO. 8805 RECORDED IN BOOK 126, PAGES 61 AND 62 OF MAP BOOKS RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND THE EASTERLY LINE AND ITS NORTHERLY PRO- LONGATION OF TRACT NO. 8806 RECORDED IN BOOK 130 PAGES 38 AND 39 OF MAP BOOKS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SEC- TION 31; THENCE 'WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EASTERLY 430 FEET OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EASTERLY 430 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION BEING ALSO THE CENTERLINE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE AND SAID CENTERLINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE 'WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH- WEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31 AND THE CENTERLINE OF MILLIKEEN AVENUE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG WESTERLY LC.E AND SAID CENTERLINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LLNE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT -OF- '.JAY, THENCE 2 of j • E VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE • DISTRICT EXHIBIT '5" WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 260 ACRES OF SAID SECTION 36, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 36 AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST HALF TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID EAST HALF TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; !HENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST HALF TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 31 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTHERLY 50 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL AND SOUTHERLY 50 FEET FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 32 TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE NORTHERLY 50 FEET ALONG SAID 'WEST LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 32 TO THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS AS PER MAP RECC.ROED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS PAGE 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; Th1ETICE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 3of8 7. VICTORIA t, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT EXHI BIT "B" 1 OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RE- CORDED IN BOCK 5397, PAGE 475 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK I; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK TO THE NORTH- 9 EAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 150.00 FEET OF THE EAST 200.00 FEET OF LOT • 8 IN SAID BLOCK I; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH 150.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 200.00 FEET OF SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID 'WESTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 100.00 FEET OF LOT 9 IN SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED EASTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 360.00 FEET OF LOT 9 IN SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 360.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 300.00 FEET OF SAID BLOCK I; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTICNED WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 200.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 1; E 4 of '. L VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE • DISTRICT EKH'SIT "S" THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED EASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINES OF LOTS 9 AND 10 IN SAID BLOCK I TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THE^.CE SCUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 15 IN SAID BLOCK I, ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION, THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK J AND THE WESTERLYLINE OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK J OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS TO THE NORTH- EAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE 'WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 40 FEET OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED IN ST -ERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -'WAY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 200 FEET OF LOT 8 IN SAID BLOCK J; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGA- TION TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 50 FEET OF LOT 9 IN SAID BLOCK J; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 220 FEET OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED WESTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH- ERLY 250 FEET OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY U(tIE OF SAID LOT TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15 IN SAID BLOCK J; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 15 TO 0E NCRTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTIIERLY 87.83 FEET OF SAID 5 of l VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ExNi BIT "B" LOT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 12 FEET OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION TO THE NORTH- ERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 5 OF SAID ETI'WANOA COLONY LANDS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 6 IN SAID BLOCK S; • THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINES OF LOTS 6, 11 AND 14 IN SAID BLOCK S TO THE NORTHERLY LINE ETIWANDA CACTUS ACRES RECORDED IN • BOOK 19 OF MAPS, PAGES 63 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SCUTH- ERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 31; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BLOCK 6 OF SAID ETI'WANDA CACTUS ACRES; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT F OF SAID ETIWANDA CACTUS ACRES; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT -OF -'WAY OF HIGHWAY 31; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -'WAY TO THE SOUTHERLY LIME OF THE NORTHERLY 50 FEET OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED IN BOOK 8219, PAGE 62 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTHERLY 6 of V!C'ORI? LANDSCAP= MAI :TEN;.NCE DISTRICT E X- IB +STERLY OF THE FOLLCWING DESCRIBED LINE; EGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 19 WITH LINE THAT IS PARALLEL '41TH AND 270,00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WEST ..INE OF LOT 18 OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 19 WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL 'WITH AND 300.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAIO LOT 18. ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 13 IN BLOCK J AND THE UNNAMED ROAD 66.00 FEET WIDE ADJOINING SAID LOT ON THE SOUTH OF SAID ETI'AANDA COLONY LANDS LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; .EGLNNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTHERLY LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE 66 FEET WIDE AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1174 PAGE 148 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 13 IN BLOC'(. J OF SAID ETI'WANOA COLONY LANDS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAIO SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF THE EAST- ERLY 150 FEET OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 5 OF SAID ET RWANDA COLONY LANDS; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID UN- NAMED ROAD. ALSO EXCEPT THE NCRTHERLY 652.25 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 500,01 FEET OF THE ?IORTH4fESi QUARTER OF SAIO SECTION 5. ALSO EXCEPT Pr ".P.0 E'. 1, OF Pf,RC E'- NAP N0,1, RECCROED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 1, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF 5,V! 3EP.h7.RDl "WO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 0LSO EXCEPT THE LAND DESCRIBED 1`7 THE DEED TO ELLENA BROTHERS RECORDED ANUARY 3, 1945 IN BOOK 1729, PAGE 306, OFFICIAL RECORDS, 8 o 8 1 �J 11 111 / I�oe O � z m Itl.uC vA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE C.STRICT NO. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN SERNAROINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7 -z/ s z ENGINEER�RCE. 23889 DATE O Itt,O ICY /l wry 1m ^O • -- 60r1- 101—p- O .o VACANT LAND GM SHT I OF I� E CITY OF RAN�,HO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM • LANDSCAPE MAIN?ENANCE DISTRICT NO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA - I COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO IIVJ STATE OF CALIFORNIA I � I O C O O u< O 7 -ZI -sr- I VACANT LAND ENGINEER RCE. 23889 DATE O Gs O SHT Z OF II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM • LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTRiCT NO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA O � O OW tar a 1 @ .1•+ 4 3 Govt. Lot 3 j; Govt. Lot 2 jz(_ BZ I VACANT LAND RCE. 23889 DATE SRT 3 OF 11 s ;wy Sl 0 Q� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY CF SAN KRNARpI,NO STATE CF CALIFORNIA Imo „o _ ..... i I . I I I I I zi —gz DATE I TRACT I I ' .�• I �, �, a I�I I VACANT LAND SMT 4 OF 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTNO. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA COJNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA a �: I � �� I I I � :zl- ' ETR�l c : . " al A 1 I I € ^I I I I Ai CT i I` 11934, 3l 8 0 �7 -Z / -gz I VACANT LAND TOFT ENGINEERTRCE. 23889 DATE 0 I: ? 1. f Go 3l 8 0 �7 -Z / -gz I VACANT LAND TOFT ENGINEERTRCE. 23889 DATE 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. CITY OF RANCHO CU'CAMCNGA COUNTY OF SAN EERNARDINO d ti Q STATE OF CALIFORNIA i �Wun :u watuuuaam �uuwuuuaua{uiq.0 w.. o...'�. .,a nuaG �i l ' TRACT ', 1Z04fo © a o TRACT 12045 . � ilARafl - .��nn *rrtamrmurrtaimmrtnm.�, F I G TR� 044 - AC T 1 LL D U CIT ENGINEER RCE, 23969 DATE VACANT LgND SNT (p - j0F II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ^I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE GSTRICT N0. NI CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNAK'NO STATE OF CALIFCRNIA TRACT 12044 'BRACT 1 I 11934 - —I L.a5W5O..U5UI5555OWW I= I � ?�♦ I i I 9 ZI n l w i v u a .7 , nuwauy5xuiuw�` .. .. Co.," �� 7 -u 8 SHT j VACANT LAND LLOYDLLOYD H�S, CITY ENGINEER RCE.23889CITY ENGINEER RCE.23889 DATE n OF 11 II rl yr n al Gji ta.3 u K Gorr, L., 6 UM ter � u -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA%IONGA CCUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATED CA= LIFORNIA e nrfnniiw -� ,fmmmnmmn7 fLLP• :I _ C 3 a G r � R f Q 0 i rr r .I �f �� f f � � • r• Y� f � If'\ � f a mmmnrt {I OO I •�0 �I I 0 — g �:9 � s le tj r. y f9 • �a r SRT 8 � R VACANT LAND CE. 23689 OATE OF 11 ]T ]05 Y 2 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM • LANDSCAPE `.1AINTENANCC CSTRICT N0, CITY OF RANCHO CLCA' „CNGA COUNTY OF SAN SERNARDNO STATE OF C%- IFORNIA con lol,w • car Lor Gar lu 5 � .• • Gorr l•r 6 _._. Ca C __ - -a munanfiimurrn I -_•— — - -�— --- __�__� O Gorr L., a - 1I -�• _1._...A JIB \.... ': ...�[ ''� \�... 1 II _•I._. q I 1 ! Ir I • RC 9� D TEg j VACANT LAND ICE 1 11 d<.. 9 (5 9 Ac 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM L4NI'SCAFF M—UNTENANCE 'STRICT NO CITY CF RAr:CHO CUCAMONGA CO(JNTY C ' F SAN HR%APD:NO STATE CF C4LlFCJ9N:A P3 _Z/ 8 z SHT 10 VACANT LAND 54TE I OF 11 LI P, 5 � P, + is 11 ~ 'K j L T 10 — P, It zN, skm _Z/ 8 z SHT 10 VACANT LAND 54TE I OF 11 13 TO J9 `�7 E, Ul I Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE CF CALIFCRNIA -4 - ----- - 23889 DATE VACANT LAND SHT 11 OF 11 • 9 E� 13 TO J9 `�7 E, Ul I Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE CF CALIFCRNIA -4 - ----- - 23889 DATE VACANT LAND SHT 11 OF 11 • CITY OF R" `VCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE CSTRICT NO. ' CITY CF RANCHO CUO -MONGA COUNTY CF SAN SERNARC!NO STATE CF CAL!FCRNIA 23 4 51613 9 11 --R:501-0 CXRT III a 11 a :23 22'2 2::19 9 w 3 1 ce G Es3m ?v'R MACE I CC p7 6 65 (2 '04 03 !64E CC6'gr 92414] 155 35 BI .RIS R.4CE Q 44RT 33 i0 N 7 34 ZZ c 35 .'C L CR00 1 3e 1 ' GE3AUl'�M �LACc = 43 V/ u .3 i 55 `.G 57 58 W w 'd GRCL'NO E T,�� E MA /NrE/JA.uCt `3 ����� S2 G9 q ' 7 Bz TRACT NO. 11934 sN} LLOYD N/i33S� C TY EN- NEER RCE. 23389 OAic (/ OF ¢ ,1 b fG IJ 3 I i�� • t. 41M.s[k3ja� 7, 34i�ir "ZEST 4 i .. ...r _.. f �SA td TREE MAIIVTENA NCE ONLY GROONO E TREE MA/NrFNANCE !�8z TRACT NO. 1204 DATE L CITY OF RA "CHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM \t \\ \ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CISTRICT 140. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA!.10NGA • CCUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFCR.WA b fG IJ 3 I i�� • t. 41M.s[k3ja� 7, 34i�ir "ZEST 4 i .. ...r _.. f �SA td TREE MAIIVTENA NCE ONLY GROONO E TREE MA/NrFNANCE !�8z TRACT NO. 1204 DATE L CITY OF R; ICHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAV BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TREE hlA /NTE.NANCE ONLY N 61ZOUNO j� TREE M,4 1NTEN4NCE iGz� 7 -fez TRACT N0. 12045 SRT 3 ENGNEER, RCE. 23c GATE OF 4 { CITY OF RA -"CHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA • COUNTY CF SAN BERNARDINO STATE CF CALIFORNIA ti I• TREE MA 11V7-6VANCE ONLY r, --EE MA /Nr'ENANCE CITY ENGINEER RCE.23oB7 —,F Z TRACT N0. 12046 srlr 4 OF ¢ • I` VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT • EXHIBIT "B" ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED TO THE NORTHER'WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT -OF -'WAY OF HIGHWAY 31; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT -OF -NAY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHhcST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THE NORTH 200 FEET OF THE WEST 230 FEET OF THE EAST 380 FEET OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK S OF SAID ETIWANOA COLONY LANDS, ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 200 FEET OF THE WEST 218 FEET OF THE EAST 368 FEET OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK S OF SAID ETI'WANDA COLONY LANDS. *ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 14 IN BLOCK J OF SAID ETI'WANDA COLONY LANDS, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 330 FEET OF SAID LOT. ALSO EXCEPT LOTS 21,22,23,24,29,30,31,32 AND THE EAST HALF OF LOT 28 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS PAGE 1 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPT LOTS 10,11,12,13,14 AND THAT PORTION OF LOT 9 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY LYING 'WESTERLY OF THE 'WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 32. ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 19 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY LYING 9 7of8 RESOLUTION NO. Z5-�S • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIBHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Descriotion of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for the fiscal year 1984 -85 for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said District. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures and walls in connection with said . parkways. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within roadway rignt-of -way and landscaping easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 ". Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 ", indicating by said boundary line the extent of the territory included within the proposedo assessment district and which map is on file in the Office of he City y• Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and more particular description of said assessment, district., and the said map so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment district., I�� Reoort of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No, * has • approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report, Landscape Maintenance District No. 2" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 20th day of June, 1984, at th e dour of 7:30 p.m, in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1984 -85. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the Hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 , • SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Ca ifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 0 DATE: 'lay 16, 1984 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer �� Ct'G1.�/OlC9 a . � IZ d> 1977 J I SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing for Annual Assessment for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2 and 3 Attached is the City Engineer's Annual Report and a Resolution declaring the City's intention to levy and collect assessments and setting a public hearing for June 20, 1984 for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2 and 3. The annual assessment for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is $9.64. The annual assessment for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 is $33.93. The annual assessment for Street Lighitng Maintenance District No. 3 is $55.90. RECOMMENDATION: \J It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolutions, giving preliminary approval of the City Engineer's Annual Report and setting a public hearing on June 20, 1984 to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Respectfully sub ittteed,, L BH :a.a Attachments \J • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1994 -85 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION This report deals with the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1984 -85 of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for Tracts enumerated in Exhibit. A within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The area to be considered is specifically defined in the body of this report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District. are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be devided on a per lot • basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available dat.a, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes • will be as indicated below for the fiscal year 1984 -85. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. 1984 -85 Estimated Assessment • 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* uantity Rate ** 9. 5800L - 51 8.82 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamps Rate Months Total 54 x 9.95 x i2 $ 6,447.60 51 x 8.82 x 12 $ 5,397.84 TrFIT S34 Z. incidental Expenses: Engineering and Administration = $1,000.00 3. Costs per dwelling unit: Total Annual Estimated Costs: $11,845.44 + $1,000 = 39.64 /year /unit No. of Units in District i33� $9.64 divided by 12 = $0.80 /mo. /unit • Assessment shall be applied to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 111. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. District. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the • RESOLUTION NO._D5 -i6-n R • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1: and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: • 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. • 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That. said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1984 -85 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. :i RESOLUTION NO. .�5- 11riSCR • A RESOLUTIOI OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and 'Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of 'Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for the fiscal year 1984 -84 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. Location of Work . SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within roadway rignt -ot -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1°. Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 ", indicating by said boundary line the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and more Particular description of said assessment district, and the said map so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment district, r1 \. I Report of Engineer • SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No * has approved ti-�fe annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance - District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 20th day of June, 1984, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1984 -85. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the Hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 • SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Go-Wr-n—me-nr Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario, a i ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1984 -85 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION This report deals with the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1984 -85 of Street Lighting Maintenance District. No. 2 for Tracts enumerated in Exhibit A within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The area to be considered is specifically defined in the body of this report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. 'Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all • areas in the District and cost shall be devided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject. area. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below for the fiscal year 1984 -85. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. n 1984 -85 Estimated Assessment • I. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamo Size* uantity Rate ** 58 L 2 8.82 *High re55Ure o lum VaDOr * *SCE Schedule LS -1. All night service per lamp per month, effective 1 -1 -84 Lamos Rate Months Total 72 x 8.82 x 12 $7,620.45 2. Incidental Expenses: Engineering and Administration = $1,000.00 3. Costs per duelling unit: Total Annual Estimated Costs: $7,620.45 + $1,000 = $33.93 /year /unit No. of Units in tstnct - -7g 533.93 divided by 12 = $2.82 /mo. /unit Assessment shall be applied to each lot as explained in Section 6. • SECTION S. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 ". These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. District. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the C� RESOLUTION NO. 05- 44 -t7CR • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2: and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: • 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1984 -85 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. �,T RESOLUTION N0. `D - 14-HCR A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ,NO. 2 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of 'Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 for the fiscal year 1984 -84 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. • Location of Work SECTION ?: The foregoing described work is to be located within roadway rgnt -of -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 ". • Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, "s-07 more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 ", indicating by said boundary line the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and more Particular description of said assessment district., and the said map so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment district. Report of Engineer • SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved tie annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, and the method of assessment,. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 20th day of June, 1984, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1984 -85. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the Hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 • SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Onta—rl-0,---CaTiTcrnia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • 1994 -85 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION This report deals with the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1984 -85 of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 for Tract Nos. 11934 and 12044 within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The area to be considered is specifically defined in the body of this report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvement. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per dwelling unit basis. • SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS �J The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual tracts are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4, ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incur-ed for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that. maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below for the fiscal year 1994 -85. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. 1984_85 Estimated Assessment S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: • Lamo Size- Quantity Rate ** SHOL 149 8.82 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor * *SCE Schedule LS -1. All night service per lamp per month. Effective 1 -1 -84 Lamps Rate Months Total 149 x 8.82 x 12 $15,770.16 2. Incidental Expenses: Engineering and Administration = $1,000.00 3. Costs per dwelling unit: Total Annual Estimated Costs: 515,770.60 + $1,000 = 555.90 /year /unit No. of Units in District To - S55,90 divided by 12 = S4.66 /mo. /unit Assessment shall be applied to each lot as explained in Section 6. • SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 31P. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District, RESOLUTION NO. 05-i6—MR • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPnRT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in 'writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: • 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1984 -85 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. RESOLUTION N0. 0j- .F9CR • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it IS the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 for the fiscal year 1984 -84 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. • Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within roadway rignt -of -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are an file in the City Clerks Office, entitled "Assessment. Diagrams Street Lighting ,Maintenance District No. 3 ". Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is' 07 more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 311, indicating by said boundary line the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and more particular description of said assessment district, and the said map so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment district. r� u Reoort of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has • approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 20th day of June, 1964, at the o of 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1984 -85. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the Hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 • SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario, a ifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. E 7�= • is 9 nr`ry no o n w+wn �r-r , �rne'n e STAFF REPORT ti ih DATE: May 16, 1964 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Richard Cota, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Formation of Underground Utility District No. 2 Along Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Base Line Road At the regular meeting of April 18, 1984, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 84 -103 calling for a public hearing to determine whether public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the formation of Underground Utility District No. 2 along Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Base Line Road. In accordance with the Southern California Edison Company's (SCE) Rule 20A ruling and regulations for allocation of said funds, it has been determined by the Engineering Staff that undergrounding in Archibald Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road is in the general public's interest for the following reasons: 1. Such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy concentration of overhead distribution facilities; 2. Said street and right -of -way is extensively used by the general public and carries a heavy volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic; 3. Said street and right -of -way passes through a civic area with scenic interest to the general public. In my April 18, 1984 Staff Report to the City Council, I addressed the potential costs to the property owners required to convert to underground facilities and recommended alternative numbered two (2) which calls for the following participation between SCE and the City: a) Request SCE to utilize Rule 20 A funds to pay for no more than 100 feet of the customer's underground service lateral within private property. This would include trenching, cable /conduit and backfilling, 0 City pays remainder of estimated conversion cost to provide the pull box and meter modifications necessary for underground conversions, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Formation of Underground Utility District No. 2 May 16, 1984 Page 2 • A subsequent detailed field investigation performed by the Southern California Edison Company and the - City's Engineering and Building Division representatives has determined that six (6) of the twenty -five (25) required underground conversions will necessitate upgrading of the existing electrical service to meet the minimum building and electrical code requirements. Considering that the Engineering Staff is recommending Option 2 (SCE and rity Participation) to cover normal costs to convert to underground servicing, it is recommended that a new meter and junction panel be provided by the City to the property owner and that the property owner complete all necessary wiring up to this panel as required to meet current building and electrical code requirements. The six (6) property owners will be required to bear the costs required to upgrade their own electrical wiring as heretofore mentioned; such costs are estimated not to exceed $500.00. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended, due to the excessive accumulation of overhead wiring and the high vehicular usage, that Underground Utility District No. 2 along Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Base Line Road be formed by adoption of the attached resolution. It is also recommended that the City Council via the Engineering Division request the Southern California Edison Company to expend Rule 20A funds for trenching to the individual service points and that City • Beautification Funds be expended to complete such service conversions except for such items as heretofore presented. � clfully submittA, LB�i: as Attachments Cl /DIST. RiCT EC,%EQjy II iI j. Li CI "I'1' y UCAVO.\'(�.\ I 1 o UTILITY CIST11CT S VICINITY M.\P 13.04.010 Title 13 • PURLIC SERViCEs Chapters. 13.04 Undercround Utility Districts 13.08 Stores Drainage Plan Chanter 13.04 UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICTS Sec-ions: 13.04.010 Definitions. 13.04.020 Public hearing by council. 13.04.030 Underground utility districts designated by resolution. 13.04.040 Unlawful acts. 13.04.050 Exception -- Emergency or unusual circumstances. 13.04.060 Other exceptions. 13.04.070 Notice to property owners and utility com- • panies. 13.04.080 Responsibility of utility companies. 13.04.090 Responsibility of property owners. 13.04.100 Responsibility of city. 13.04.110 Extension of time. 13.04.120 Violation -- Penal —Y. 13.04.010 Definitions, For the purposes of this chapter the following words and pnrases shall have the meanings set out below: A. "Commission" means the Public Utilities CO .mi'asion of the state. B. "Person" means and includes individuals, firms, corporations, partnerships, and their agents and employees. C. "Poles, overhead wires and associated overhead structures" means poles, towers, supports, wires, conductors, guys, stabs, platforms, crossarms, braces, transformers, insulators, cutouts, switches, ccm.=n•ication circuits, appliances, attachments and appurtenances located aboveground Wit: a district and used or useful in su :olyiny^ electric, com,-unicat,on or similar or associated service, D, "U. ^.der. ^.round utility di- or "distsi^ means that area is the city within •"..__, poles, overhead wires, and associated overhead strxtures^a prohibited as such area is describes J, a resolution adcptcs nursuant to the provi- sions of Section 3 of this or-4 -once. . 153 13.04.'20 -- 13.04.030 E. "Utility" includes all persons or entities s- - • eleccr'_c, communication or similar or associated ser•: ite Dv means Of materials or devices. (Ord. 11 ;l, i9 i3). 13.04.020 public hearinc by council. The council ma•: °ram time to time call public hearings to ascertain whether the public necessi r:, health, safety or welfare requires the removal of poles, overhead wires and associated overhead structures within designated areas of the city and the undercround installation of wires and facilities for subcly- inc eiectric, com.,iunicaticn, or similar or associated service. The city clerk shall notify all affected property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and utilities concerned by mail of the tine and place of such hearings at Least ten days prior to the date thereof. Each such hearing shall be open to the public and mav be continued from time to time. At each suer hearinc all cersons interested shall be given an opcort• =J ty to he heard. The decision of the council sha11 be final and conclusive. (Ord. 11 52, 19;3). 13.04.030 Underground utility districts desicnated by resol.'t_'zn. A. it, aster any such public nearing the council finds that the public necessity, health, safety or welfare reauires such removal and such undercround installation within a designated area, the council shall, by resolution, declare such designated area an underground utility district and • order such removal and undercround installation. B. The council shall also make one or more of the following tirdings; That such undergroundinc will avoid or eliminate an unusually neav;• concentration of overhead electric facili- ties; 2. The street or read right- cf -•sav is extensively used by the general public and carries a heavv volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic; 3. The street or road r'_cht -of -way passes through a civic area or cublic recreation area or an area of unusual scenic interest to the general public. C. Such resolution shall include a description of the area comprising such district and shall fix the time within which such removal and underground installation shall be accomplished and within which affected prccerty owners must be ready to receive undercround service. e reasonable time shall be allowed for such removal and undergrcund installation, having due regard for the availability of funds, labor, materials and e ?•cement cecessary for sack removal and the install= of •uch undercround facilities as mav occasioned ...__eby. ,(Ord. ll 53, '9 73), _ 154 13.04.040 -- 13.04.060 13.: -040 Unlawful acts. Whenever the council creates a; J - ' _ _ and orders the removal of poles,e overhead wires anc associated overhead structures therein as provided in Sect_cn 13.04.030, it $hall be unlawful for anv person or utility to erect, construct, place, keen, mazatain, continue, emplo;• or operate poles, overhead wires and associated overhead structures in the district after the date when said overhead facilities are recuired to be removed by such resolution, except as the overhead facilities may be recuired to furnish service to an owner or occupant of pro - nerty prior to the performance_ by such owner or occupant of the uncereround work necessary for such owner or occupant to continue to receive utility service as provided in Section 13.04.090, and for suc: reasonable time required to remove the facilities after said work has been performed, and except as otherwise provided in this chapter. (Ord. 11 34, 1978). 13.04.050 Exception-- 4merpenev or unusual circumstances. Notwitastanaing tae provisions or this cha_oter, overhead facilities may be installed and maintained for a period, not to exceed ten days, without authority of the city engineer in order to provide emercency service. The city encineer may grant special permission, on such terms as deemed appro- priate, in cases of unusual circumstances, without discriair.- ation as to any person or utility, to erect, construct, install, maintain, use or operate poles, overhead wires and • associated overhead structures. (Ord. 11 35, 1978). 13.04. 060 Ct:-.e _ _ _ pas. In a..n.y resolutic.. adopted s•_,ant to Section 13.04.030, tie followinc are exempted unless specifically included in tie resolution: A. Any municipal facilities or equipment installed under the supervision and to the satisfaction of the cir_: engineer: B. Poles, or eleatroliers used exclusively for street li g'"inq C. Overhead :wires (exclusive of suo_oorting structures) crossing any portion of a district within which overhead wires have been prohibited, or connecting to buildincs on the perimeter of a district, when such wires oriain_te in an area from which poles, overhead wires and associated overhead structures are not prohibited; D. Poles, overhead wires and associated overhead structures used for the _ransmiss -on of elect^ c enercv at nominal voltages in excess of t..__ fnur thousand `!•,-e hundred volts; E. Over-.ead :wires att_cned to the exterior s__race of a - _ by means 0. a .._ _.. t Or _ _ and P_xta,u1_ i nc yf rom•one location on the b'uri4L. ^,_•tJ'anO t.^2r`lOC1t.CR on tie sane ouildJna or to an ad,acent b',114ing without crossiru ar.v public ztreet; LJ 135 13.04.07J-- '.3.04.090 F. Antennae, associated ecuic_ -.eat and supporting str_c- • used by a,utilitp for _°,._ n_ _ n� cor�.unicationy seroice_s; ,G. Ecultment appurtenant to under,_ound "aci" ties, such as sur -ace mounted transformers, pedestal mounted teracna_ boxes and meter cabinets, and concealed ducts; H. T>_mcorary _poles, overhead wires and associated over:-.ead structures used or to be used in con3unction with construction project. (Ord. 11 56, 1978). 13.04.070 Notice to oroperty owners and utilitv cc -.- nanies. A. Witnia zen daps aster the fective date o= - - adopted pursuant to Section 13.04.030, the cit• clerk shall notif': all affect =_d utilities and all persons owning real property within the district created by said resolution of the adoption thereof. The city clerk shall further notify such affected orooerty owners of the necessit:• that, .: they or anv person occupying such pronerty desire to ccntinue to receive electric, communication, or similar or associated service, they or such occupant shall provide all necessary = cility changes on their premises so as to receive suc-, service from the lines of the supplying utility or utilities at a new location. S. Not- ficaticn by the city clerk shall be made by mailing a cep•: of the resolution adopted pursuant to Section 13.04.030, tocet:er with a cepv of the ordinance codified in this cca_o_er, to affected procert•: owners as such are shown • on the last ec•ual_•zed assessment roll and to the affected uti Litres. (Ord. 1i 57, 1973). 13. ^4.037 aescons_pr Li_•: of comnani_s. I: under -rocnq construction is necessary to provice tilit service wrthia a dirt r_tt created by 'any resolutioR adcptad pursuant to section 13.04.030, suo_olyinc utility shall, °urns that ccrtion of the conduits, cr„duc -ors and asso- ciated ecu_c -.end required to be furnished by it ender Its aonlicable rules, reculations and tar_ffs on file with the commission. (Ord. 11 58, 1978). 13.04.090 3esconsibility of prover-:' owners. A. Every_ person owning, operating, leasing, occappinc or renting a building or structure within a district shall construct and provide that - ort_on o: the service connection on his p 1 - between the fac!" tias referred to in Section 13.04.083 anc the termination facility on or •within said buildina or structure being served. if the atov=_ 45 not accgmplis;,ed b, any cerscn 'within ne __-. ded _ _ „_ rest iUtiJn enacted ursuan_ --action L3.34.030, _-.a _ e _ Shall - i pct_. l n -.wr:__ V to ._ - . of 3uC :”, pramses, a notice •wrlt_'.: to the owner ^2Cf as sno•wn on tne last eerualized assessment roll, to pro ,::-z_ _ne _- c'u__ed _ _., ..______es .. _t.._., _en da;- at___ rece• 3: sup.. notice is 156 13.04.ogo B. The notice to provide the recuired underground • facilities may he given either t•• personal service or by -n case of service by mail on ei cher o: sunh persons, the notice must be deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope with postage prepaid, addressed to the person in possession of such premises at such premises, and the notice must be addressed to the owner thereof as such owner's name appears, and must be addressed to such owner's last known acdress as the same appears on the last equalized assessment roll, and when no address appears, to General Delivery, Cit•, of Rancho Cuczmonca. If notice is given by mail, such notiue shall be deemed to have been received by the person to whom it has been sent within forty -eight hours after the mailing thereof. If notice is given by mail to either the owner or cccnpant of such premises, the city encineer shall within forty -eic ht hours zfcer the mailing thereof, cause a copy_ thereof, printed on a card not less than eight inches hp ten inches in size, to be posted in a conspiceous place on the premises. C. The notice civen by the city engineer to provide the recuired underground facilities shali particularly specify what wor:c is recuired to be done, and shall state that if said work is not ccmpleted with in thirty days after receipt of such notice, the city encineer will provide such required underground facilities in which case the cost and expense thereof will be assessed against the property benefited and • become a lien upon such property. D. If upon the expiration of the thirty day period, the said recuired undercroun.d facilities have not been provided, the city encineer shall forthwith proceed to do the work; provided, however, if such premises are unoccupied and no electric or co, =ur.ication services are being furnished thereto, the city engineer may in lieu of providina the recuired facilities, authorize the disconnection and removal of any and all overhead service wires and associated facilities supplying utility service to the property. Upon completion of the work by the city engineer, he shall file a written report with the city council setting forth the fact that tie recuired underground facilities have been provided and the cast thereof, together with a legal description of the property against which such cost is to be assessed. The council shall thereupon fix a time and Glace for hearing protests against t e assess- ment of the cost o: such work up_or,, such premises, wh' -ch .ime s all not be less than ten daps thereafter. E. The city encineer shall, ,:non the t_.., e for hen ring such. protests having been ..xed, cave a notice in writing to the cerscn in pcssess.or, of - _sas, grid a notice in wr: t_ - thereof to .._ ..-_mot =_of, the manner ro^,ided in tnis ztanter ..or t e _ a of t •�" tie notice to pro•: ,de the recuired cncer :roan: facto ___s, of the time and place that the count:, 'will n the __cent and will hear , rotests I1 U 137 13.04.:00-13..4.120 • acainst the assessment. Such notice a---!! _ also se fort: the amount 04 p onosed assessment. F. Upon the date and hour set for the hearing of prc- tes s t o council shal 1 he=r and consider retort and a1L protests, if -e be any, and then proceed �to affirm, m.,odif Jor e3e_t the •ass__ assessment. G. if any assessments is not raid within c ive days after __ its con^ation by the council'_, the amount of assessment shall become a Lien uo_ci the prcnerty acainst which the assessment is "fade ov the city engineer, and the city encineer is directed to tun over to to treasurer a notice of lien on earn of t e properties on which the assessment has not been paid, and the treasurer shall add the amount of the asses scent to the next regular hill for taxes levied acainst the premises upon which the assessment was not paid. The assessment shall be due and na••,ab1_= at tae same time as the prover.•_; taxes are due and payable, and if not paid when due and payable, shall bear interest at the rate of six per- cent per ann=. (Ord. 11 59, 1978). 13 .04.100 Resnonsibil;ty of c4` The city shall remove at its own enter ^.se ail city - owned ecuicnent from all poles required to be removed hereunder in ample time to enable the owner or user of such poles to remove the same within the time specified in the resolution enacted pursuant to Section 13.04.030. (Ord. 11 510, 1978). . 17.04.110 Extension of tine. I.n. the event that any act _ -_ = •1 - ' p is cnapt -_ . by resolution adopted pursuant to Section 13.04.030 cannot beperforo.ed •within tae time provided on account of shortage of materials, war, restraint by pub'__c authorities, strikes, labor disturbances, civil disobedience, or any other circ•amstances beyond the control Of the actor, then the time within which the act will be accompli s;-.ed shall he extended for a period eau -4 alent to the time of the limitation. (Ord. 11 511, 1979). 41 13.02.120 Violation -- Penalty. It shall be unlawful for any -person to violate any provision or to fail to compl^ with any o: the requirements of this chapter. Any person violating any provision of this chatter or failing to ccmpls" with any of i s requirements shall be deemed c_uilty of a - misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be cunisted by a :_ne not exceedi- f hundred dollars or my impr.son- mant not six -mcnt. s, or 5•• bot.. suc;; - and _c,pn s0nr..ent� -':acn such cerscn eh.a_1 'ce 9ee =_d :o ' a se=ar-to .,_c _.se for earn ^ nortic. .: d.zc:. any vio.at_cn oC any of _ne rcPis_c:.s ..t tnls a. _ corn..•. mot_ co.. to ^._. son _ _^9_sa...1 be nuoi - '.ab_a there'cr _s ..._ in _.._s cnanter. (Ord. 11 111. 1373). 155 21. RESOLUTION NO. .05- 46 -05CR • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA:MONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT 10. 2 ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM CHURCH STREET TO BASE LINE ROAD WHEREAS, a oublic hearing was held on May 16, 1984, at the hour of 7:30 pm, at the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, to determine whether the public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the formation of an underground utility district along Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California; and WHEREAS, a notice of such nearing has been given to all affected Property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and to all utilities concerned in the manner and for the time required by law; and WHEREAS, such hearing has been duly and regularly held and all persons interested have been given an opportunity to be heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: Section 1: It is hereby found and determined pursuant to Rancho • Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 13.04 and the definitions contained herein that the public necessity, health, safety and welfare requires the formation of an underground utility district along Archibald Avenue, from Church Street. to Base Line Road, in order to remove utility poles, overhead wires and associated structures and to underground utilities along said portion of Archibald Avenue. Said Archibald Avenue is a public street which is extensively used by the general public and carries a heavy volume of vehicular traffic. Section 2: An underground utility district to be known as underground Utility District No. 2 is hereby established in that area along Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, more particularly described as follows: Those portions of Parcel Map No. 793 as per plat recorded in Book 8 of Parcel Maps, Pages 8, 9 and 10; Parcel Map No. 4365, as per plat recorded in Book 39 of Parcel Maps, Page 24; Portion of Cucamonga Fruitlands, as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9; Tract No. 8332, as per plat recorded in Boo'< 111 of Maps, Pages 1 and 2; Tract No. 5351, as cer plat recorded in Book 100 of 'flans, Pages 32 and 33; Parcel :flap No. 6651, as per plat recorded in Book 71 of Parcel Maps, Pages 17 and 13; Parcel dap No. 4251, as per plat recorded in Book 43 of Parcel Maps, Pages 61 and 62; Tract No. 9522, as per plat recorded in Book 135 of ® Maps, Pages 69 and 70; Tract. No. 7913, as per plat recorded in Book 102 of Maps, Pages 60 and 61; all records of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California, lying within a strip of land 120.00 feet wide, the centerline of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the centerline of Archibald Avenue distant thereon North 1° 06, 08" 'West 160.00 feet from the • intersection of the centerlines of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue as per the above said Parcel Map No. 793; thence Southerly along said centerline of Archibald Avenue, a distance of 2,970.00+ feet to the intersection of the centerlines of Church Street and said Archibald Avenue. The sidelines of said 120.00 foot wide strip of land are parallel to and measured at right angles from the above described centerline of Archibald Avenue, and shall be prolonged or shortened so as to begin from a line perpendicular to and passing through said Beginning Point an the centerline of Archibald Avenue and terminate at said centerline of Church Street. NOTE: That certain map entitled "Underground Utility District No. 2 ", which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is attached hereto and made a part of this description of the Archibald Avenue Underground Utility District No. 2. Section 3: All poles, overhead wires and associated overhead structures s— na TTT be removed and underground installations made in said underground utility district within the following times and conditions: a. Underground installation by Utility Companies and property owners • and reconnections no later than May 1, 1985. b. Removal of poles, ovehead wires and other associated structures no later than August 1, 1985. c. That the Southern California Edison Company utilizes Rule 20A funds to underground the first one- hundred (100) feet of service lateral for those property owners required to convert to underground. d. That the City of Rancho Cucamonga utilize City Beautification funds to complete the service conversions (i.e. pull can, terminals and meter modifications) for those property owners required to convert to underground. Section 4: The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail a copy hereof and a copy of Municipal Code Section 13.04 to all affected property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and to all affected utilities within ten (10) days after adoption of this resolution, • 11T1' nV n h %TOUn OTTO %A Tnll' 1 STAFF REPORT DATE: May 16, 1964 TG: Mayor and Members of the City Council - - -1�,- FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AMENDMENT 84 -0 - RICBNO00 - A Deve 7pment Districts Amendment from Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) to Low Medium Residential (4- 8 du /ac) for 16.3 acres of land located on the south side of Arrow Highway, north side of 9th Street, between Baker Avenue and Madrone Avenue - APN 207 - 261 -02 and 07, 207- 132 -01 thru 37. SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on April 11, 1984 to consider the above described project and recommended approval of the Negative Declaration and Development Districts Amendment (Zone Change). In addition, the Planning Commission approved the related Tentative Tract 12621 for the development of 29 duplexes (58 units). Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission staff report which fully describes the proposed Development Districts Amendment. The proposed Development Districts Amendment and project are consistent with the City's General Plan and related ordinances. The project site is appropriate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development. No adverse environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this Development Districts Amendment. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Development Districts Amendment request through the adoption of the attached Ordinance and issuance of a Negative Declaration. t 1 Respectful submitted: Rick�Ga�>� city %fanner Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report - DDA 84 -01 Planning Commission Resolution Proposed City Council Ordinance 9 CI — (21:': OF RANCHO Ci:CAMONGA ST. 4 - ?-- -)(-IN �m —i —� 1 ail l DA-,-; 49ril 11, _9q4 T0: Chairman and '!e:'Ders of t'he_ Planning Commission ..•�i!: R1C% Gam4Z, Planner C.:r -'ohns -33n., .,1ss aC lat2 Planner Sh'E„ -� PTV IRO.'1:4E'; ?�L ASSES S'dENT AND DEVE OPvE"T OTS711CTS RlC' -'4007 - .1 Oeve iopment ]iscr ict �mencmenc From 4edlum Residential (8 -14 du's /ac) to Lnn- :4edium Residential (4 -8 du's /ac) for 16.3 acres of land located on the south side of Arrow Highwav, north side of 9th Street, between baker Avenue and "adrone Avenue - ,AP:1 207 - 261 -02 and 07, 207- 132 -01 thru 37. RELATED FILE: TE;ITATI' /E TRACT 12621 - RICHSJ000 I. PROJEiT AND S17E DESCRIPTION: A. Action Reou_sted: Aooroval of a Development District Amendment and issuance or a Negative Declaration. B. Puroosa: The development of 29 duplexes (53 units). C. Location: South of Arro,v, west of 'ladrone, North of gth, east of 3axer. D. Parcel Size: 16.3 acres. E. Existino Zoning: i^edium- Residential F. Existing Land 'Jse: Vacant G. Surrounding Land !Jse and Zonino- North an - Single- ramiiy d multi - family units, vacant prooerty, zoned Medium-Residential. South - Cuo Tex units .vithin Tract 9658, church, zoned '!edium- Residential. East - sinhle- '-rnily homes, coned :tedium- Residential; restauranc, zoned General Commerr,ial. Nest - Sinole- family suodivision, elementary school, zoned Low- Residential. PL.'- NI•IG CO ? "'IISSION S AFF REPORT • April 11, 1934 Pagz 2 General plan De_si ^n 3tirns: Pro, -cc Sate - ;,Ieo:u„iestaential ;1 -11 North - Potential par< site, tedium -R e_r dential , chi 's /ac). Sou'n - pled iam -,csi den, i 31 du 's /3c?. East - vat iui- Resid an* ial du's /ac 1, Ccraner:'3' to southeast iCas< and Cleaver Restaurant;. '.Jest - Law- Residential (2 -4 du's /ac). I. Site - haracta,isti,s: Projett site sloces to the southeast uni rormiy at aporo.('7ately 2 11M Vegetation is limited to indigenous shrubs and weeds. No structures exist on the property. II. ANALYSIS: A. Gene ^al: This Development District Amenn-ent :vas sub7itted in conjuncs ion with Tentative Tract 12621, also on tonight's agenda. The original application subaitted by the )evelooer included only the 7.35 project site for Tentative Tract • 12621. The boundaries of the Amendment 'were expanded pv staff to include the southerly church, and Tract 9653 also c v-looed by Rich:rood with identical units as or000sed with 7T 1252:. The intent of expanding the Aiendment 'etas to provide consistency of zoning regulations for botp Richwood projects and the adjoining church. • Approval of DDA 34 -01 is necessary to allpw the applicant to develop TT 12621 under the Optional Development Stanaards of the LX District. Development standards of the I•led ium Residential District, such as lot sizes and dinenslons, open space requirements, and setbacks, differ from the LM District because they were written to apply to multi - family projects with higher densities. Since the Richwood projects are single- family in character, the Low- Medium standards a ^e more applicable, In addition, development of TT 12621 '!mde^ the L ?I standards is consistent with Tract 9653 and co- oatiple with other adjoining prooerties. B. Environn�nt31 ,�s �s sr.en r,: Part I of the Initial Study '•ias Seen comoiated by the applicant. Starf romol,_tei the Environmental Chec <li st and found no sio_nificant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this zone change. If the =anission concco's with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. • . 3 PLA';'.I'IC CJIN ?:;. TI S_;FF - -PO' T ODA t .Aorii i ?, 1031 Pan- -ir_a • The Develec-ient Distrirt ;menement is consistent with cne General Plan, and the Proocsed tract dith a density or anoroximately 7.1 units per acre is consistent :iith the L'1 district. In addition, the chan:e of zone for Tract 9653 and the church is consistent,rith the existina usas on the orocarty and cz—za'1b1.e Ai to the surroundina Tana Uses. Aporovdl z ,i1e District .menament 011 not treat, any adverse impacts on the envlroomenc or oe detrimental to properties or imorovements in the vicinity. V. CDRRESP7):D VICE: This item has been advertised as a Public Pearina in .he Dai.v ?eoo -* newspaper, Notices were sent to all prooerty owners .n in in SJD feet of the subject properties. In addition, Public Nearing notices were posted on the site. To date no corresoonaence has been received either for or against this project. V. REC C'd'dE'IDA ? ?0 > ;: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conauct a Public Nearing to consider public input and elements or r this project, If after such consideration the Commission concurs • \ with the facts for findinos, adoption of the attacned Resolution and rzcor.-endation of a Negative Declaration to the City Council would be appropriate. Res p.� tfllllyy,STTDIiitted, Rick Gomez City; Planner RG:CJ:ns i Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location .dap Exhibit "D" - General Plan and Zoning ,daps Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan for TT 12621 Initial Study - Part I Resolution of Approval i i, u • ll � % III -- i A � r•1 ••r r.�..:_. �\ / '.i'I .. I i I r i _,Ll!l] -�•�� �'a�'• �,`_ yip i:'� i �r lli rM¢ _ - �1'•n� jI � � I � r I eV • � Z�- 1_I.O1� 4 •.(114'.Vu = V umc wr �H .l uxl.nc v NORT! I C • RANCHO CUCA\ uN(;,1 TITI.!. PLANNING DIVISION I:�Inrrr:- .- i�SCTI.rf: ;�Y r Arrow DiStrict 9MED mw GC e CITY OF RANCHO CUC,\,NIONGA -�A iO PLANING DIVEION A --- 3�- SCALE: �- 0 • NORTI I CITY OF RANCIA) CUCAMONG-1 t . ITU' PLANNING DIVISION 1AIMIT: e- SCALE! C1-- OF R�—':C—O PA-.. I PR=EC7 !=R!A=N SHEET - To be completed .0 n n tv ar7' 4 cant 7 " vironmental Assessment Review Fe--: $3 I For all prciects recu-irin= en•irnnmental raview, -n-- form must be completed and submitted to t-e Deve:zzmanz Review Cc=lttee through the department where t�e protect application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will Part 11 of the Initial S-udv. The Develoomenz Fev-,ew Committee will meet and take action no later th ' an zen (10) days before the public meeting at which time - . ne pro3ect is to be heard. The Committee will make one cf three determinations: 1) The project will have no sic..L- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a sianizL2a❑t environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Rencrt will be prepared, or 3) An additional info�aticn reptrt should be supplied by the applicant giving further in: . nrma- ticn concerning the proposed pro)ect. PR=-'-T TITLE: -7.\C,7 "6'1 CF—FEK TIT) iCTic A2nT--_N-IS NAN'.E, -1-70rz co. --I- . ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: �4c' 26" N,rt!i rin Gahrlei P.1-d. I ... 01,—, C\ 1.11% -1.--z nl NA.%IE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE- CCNTAC7--:, CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: n+'• : 2A5 'forth can lintl�icl 1-,� 111117 .in, LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSZ-. NO.) tt' LIST 0-4-ER PERIXITS NEC-SSARY FROM LOCAL, REGlo% Aj, S7:,-E A!:D FEDZ-RAL--AGENCJBS AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH P==S: I-i i PROJECT OESC5IPTIC:: CEECRIPT:O[t OF PRCJECT: S�ncle .. �.... :., ACZZAGE va PRO : °CT ; fnzA 7i7O SCU FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: -.S, n'Cr" Ate. Wcoa u'.' /S 11,5 TcTAL 4L J"I SETT' °G OF THE PROD--CT 5:.-- INCLUDING ISPORA.ATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), A.NI ?IALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORIC;SL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY En:STING STRUCTURES AND THEIR LSE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)t Is the cro7ect part of a larger project, one of a series of cunT Iative ac.icns, which alt: ^ouch individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? 0 I -2 r V iI 46 K Yz5 \0 1. Create a substantial chance in orc.nd ccntc_rs: .. 2. Create a s•l:bstant4-1 zi�anzc.c in existing noise cr vibrat__n? 2. Create a Jstantial c.h= dar.tn.d c :unicina l� services (pciice, __re, 4ater, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create chances in the ex4stinc zoning cr general plan desiz _,..ins; 5. Remove an•: ex:istino trees? How many? _ > 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials s•.:ch as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Exolana_ ca of a^. ` `3 answers above - ^r.locc rill III 16 Z�r IV°OHTSiT: If the project involves the construction o_` residential units, complete the form on the nest page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluat ion to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and infcr ation presented ate true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I furtner understand that addit _ information may be recurred to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can he cacti by -he Development Review Co -ttee. ~, Date ciana ta':e Title t -1 T"e 4cilowin; infor=atic" should be prc,..ided to t-e of Ranaho planning Dl•risjo.n in order to a46 4r. assessinz t"c ab�-'-tv 0' t�.a sc-co'- district to accoomodate the propose_ resident!a! NaZe 04 Developer and Tentative Tr4ct No.: Specific Location of Pr-,3ect: PFLm.zr P.. S-' 2 P.-. 1. Nu7ber of single f =i 1 4� 60 SecC 37+ S y un-5: 2. Number of multiple =its: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: ju❑o 4. Earliest date of occl-,?arlcy: Mod,! � an& 2 of Tentative S. Bsdrccms Price Rance 127n 44 ea 3 bdm 1007 16 ea 2 bdn SecC 37+ S 553.000 573,000 • F- -M RESOLUTION NO. 84 -29 • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA)IONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECO :IMENOI:IG APPROVAL OF DISTRICT CHANGE 40. 84 -01 REQUESTI„G A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM TO LOW - MEDIUM FOR 16.3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW, NORTH SIDE OF 9TH, BETWEEN BAKER AND MAORONE. WHEREAS, on the 6th day of January, 1934 an application was filed and accepted on the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of April, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and • 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTiO ^1 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project.vi 11 not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on April 11, 1984. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 11th day of April, 1984, District Change No. 84 -01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt District Change No. 84 -01. 3. That a Certified Cony of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF APRIL, 1964. • CCM:dISS13:7 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dennis L ' =tout, i ATTEST: ,RicK Gomez, I, Rid Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho/'Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regulairly introduced, passed, and adooted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of April, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 50 • i1 U ORDINANCE N0. 4&- 1fi -0+eO • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 207- 261 -02 and 07, 207- 132 -01 thru 37, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW, NORTH SIDE OF 9TH, BETWEEN BAKER AND MADRONE AVENUES, FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DU /AC) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DU /AC). The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • C. That this rezoning is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein, SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the development district map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessor's Parcel Numbers 207- 261 -02 and 07, 207- 132 -01 thru 37, approximately 16.3 acres of land located on the south side of Arrow, north side of 9th, between Baker and Madrone Avenues, is hereby changed from Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). Ordinance No. 05- 16 -OICO Page 2 • The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dai , a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1984. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon 0. Mies, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City er 7 • 11 • • 11111 / /TT ITTl l \I/ ITI.. STAFF REPORT'S Vim. s: t ll T J DATE: May 16, 1984 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11781 - ROBERTS GROUP - A total residential evelopment of condominiums on 6.4 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (4 -14 du /ac) located on the west side of Hermosa, approximately 330 feet north of 19th Street - APN 202- 171 -29 and 38. SUMMARY: The applicant has appealed the Planning Commission decision to deny the time extension request for Tentative Tract 11781. The City's Subdivision Ordinance allows an initial tentative tract map approval of two (2) years and two additional one (1) year extensions for a total time period of four years to prepare a final tract map. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of April 11, 1984, reviewed the time extension request and project design. Based upon that review, the Commission determined that the project design was inconsistent with the current Development Code standards in areas regarding energy conservation, recreational amenities, interior and side setbacks, and landscaping, and therefore denied the time extension request. The applicant is currently working with the City Attorney on an agreement to ensure the City's ability to guarantee installation of solar water heating and recreational amenities. A memo from the City Attorney will be available at the meeting regarding this matter. The decision to deny the request was also based on the City Attorney's opinion that the City could not impose new conditions, with or without the applicant's consent, at the time of an extension request. He advised that the Commission could either "Grandfather" the previously approved tract per the Development Code, or deny the extension request finding that the project is at variance with the Development Code requirements. Additionally, this project is located within the 19th Street Corridor Study area which is currently undergoing analysis by the Planning Commission regarding General Plan land use densities. Attached for your review and consideration is the Planning Commission staff report which fully outlines the project and issues. Also attached is a copy of the Commission's Resolution of Denial and Minutes of the meeting of April 11, 1984. 15 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Time Extension Denial - TT 11781 May 16, 1984 Page 2 r1 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denial of the appeal request based upon the findings contained within the Resolution. Resp1ctf lly- sQiittedd,, -- Rick doiaey City Planner RG:DC:jr Attachments; Appeal Letter from Applicant Planning Commission Staff Report - April 11, 1984 Planning Commission Resolution of Denial Planning Commission Minutes - April 11, 1984 i1 LJ • 73 (1z17:40 :-,....'iL y -::,i 93062 ,hor,: 0'J5 --i81 7r,5; • THE ROBERTS GROUP, INC. • 0 y y j F�Fji CITY (;r * i;.- ',,FICA 10N T. CCMYONI ?Y f•CV; CcpgcNT DEPT.. APR 16 1984 AM ps 713191b�1ii12i11?�3�4�6 6 April 12, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 ATTN: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: Appeal of Planning Commission Decision For Extension of Tentative Tract #11781 Gentlemen: The Roberts Group respectfully appeals the Planning Commission decision regarding Tentative Tract 611781 and requests that it be extended. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respec tf ally, Bruce Tripp President, Land Division BT /kf cc: Mr. Hamilton Smith CITY OF RANCHO COCA VIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 11, 1984 " TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commnission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11781 - ROBERTS GROUP - A total residential development of 76 condominiums on 6.4 acres of land in the the Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) District located on the west side of Hermosa, approximately 330 feet north of 19th Street - APN 202 - 171 -29 6 38. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a 12 -month time extension for Tentative Tract 11781, as described above. The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on April 22, 1981. The current expiration date is April 22, 1984. The developer is requesting a 12 -month extension to April 22, 1985. This is the final time extension that may be granted for this map. All phases of this map must be recorded prior to the expiration date. This project is located within the 19th Street Corridor Study area boundary, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ". The approved project density is approximately 12 dwelling units per acre. This study is currently undergoing further analysis by the 19th Street Corridor subcommittee and staff. II. ANALYSIS: Since the approval of this project, the new Development Code was adopted. Therefore, in order to consider a time extension, this project was reviewed for conformance with the Development Code requirements. Based upon this review the following inconsistencies with the Optional Development Standards for the Medium Residential District were noted: 1. Energy Conservation - The Development Code requires an alternative energy system to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa. Solar energy was intended to be the primary energy system. The conditions of approval for this project require preplumbing for solar; however, the project did not include a solar water heating system. r ITEM A µ5. PLANNDIG COMMISSIOtt 'AFF REPORT Time Extension /TT P,81-Roberts Group April 11, 1934 Page 2 2. Recreation Area /Facility - Recreational amenities are required To conjunction with common open space areas such as, but not limited to, swimming 'pools and spas, court facilities (e.g. tennis, basketball, volleyball, etc.). In addition, an enclosed tot lot area with play equipment and a large open lawn area is required. Further, all recreational areas or facilities are required to be maintained by a private homeowners association or private assessment district. The site plan, as shown on Exhibit "B ", does not indicate any recreation facilities or amenities. 3. Interior Site Boundary Setback - A 20 -foot setback is required along the project per ter, •whereas 10 -feet has been provided as shown on the site plan, Exhibit "B ". However, this discrepancy only occurs adjacent to the flood control channel or the Foothill Freeway corridor and is not considered significant, 4. Hermosa Streetscaoe Setback - A 45 -foot landscape and building setback is required from the curb face along Hermosa Avenue; however, only 37 feet has been provided. 5. Driveway Width - The parking regulations require a 29 -foot wide driveway between garages, whereas only 24 feet has been provided. However, if the garage apron is calculated into the driveway width, the project exceeds the 29 -foot requirement. Items 1 and 2 would have a significant effect on the appearance of the project, therefore it is recommended that, with consent of the applicant, additional conditions of approval be added to the project to require compliance with the Development Code provisions. Items 3 -5 are not considered to be significant and would not significantly alter the appearance of the project. III. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has two alternatives to consi er: gain the consent of the applicant for these discrepancies to be modified through new conditions of approval consistent with the new Development Code requirements; or, (2) deny the time extension if the Commission feels that the tentative map is in conflict with the direction of the new Development Code. Respectfully submitted, yC lr Rick ,Gomez City/ Planner ,RG:OCtjr PLANNING COMMISSIOCY 'AFF REPORT Time Extension /TT I�LAI- Roberts Group April 11, 1984 Page 3 • Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Site Plan Exhibit "C -1 and C -2" - Elevations Planning Commission Resolution of Approval 81 -42 Time Extension Resolution of Approval Time Extension Resolution of Denial • • ;. ? '.- • THE ROBERTS GROUP, INC. i191 O m.)11�''i h,I�I`Ily b :a arcr 7 , 1934 Ci' c: ?ancno Cucamenra 90 a. n u Ross, S: ". c ?. .ox _37 Rancho Cucamonga CA 917 ?0 AT T;i: Planning Department PE: 8c,^.0 t.,. FOR EXTENSION OF TENTATIVE TRACT =11791 Gentlemen: The 9oberts Group, Inc respectfully requests that Tent - ative ;rant =11791 be axtended. Please extend the subject tract because The Roberts Group, Inc. needs more Lire to finalize the tract map and engineering plans. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Bruce Tripp President, Land Division BT/k' i S i_n i !,JL a STUDY AREA BOUNDARY SCALE 19 to ST. CORRIDOR STUDY NORTH CITY or ITFAI: -T 11791 RANCHO CCC1,%K) \G.1 TITI,F: �_ �-*+�N ��F, PLANNING DIVISION I.XIIIIiIT scmx: • • 0 • 79cf,cle-eD FooTHII-L WelEFIWAY Cop-r-jo6p — r—G— -v — V CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUC,-\,NK),x(,,1 TITLE; -5 PLANNINC, DIVISION EXHIBIT SCALE: I �-, rn NORTH I ct-1 rl� INoIIT14 CITY OF [Tr\i:_ir 117S RANCHO CUCAMONGlik TITIT; PLANNING DIVISION EM MIT SCALE: ) Ll n LJ 9--k ��✓atiic,ll CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CCC- 1JI0 \Gr1 PLANNING DIVISION IT(\I: liir- 73! TITLE: L41 -ham EXI MIT \ORTI I RESOLUTIC71 NO. 31 -12 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIT'i OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11781 (P.D. 80 -14). WHEREAS, Tentative Tract 11ap No. 11781, hereinafter "Mao" submitted by The Roberts Group, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 6.4 acres of land located on the west side of Hermosa, north of 19th, consisting of 76 dwelling units, and being divided into 1 lot, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on April 22, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: • SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11781 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. • �:esoiution ::o. S1 -.:) Page 2 l (g) That this project will not create adverse imcacts on the • environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECT;,N 2: Tentative Tract ?lap ';o. 11731, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION I. Low profile rock walls shall be incorporated into the landscape design along Hermosa Avenue. ENGINEERING DIVISION 2. Design and installation of improved channel for Alta Loma Channel from westernmost tract boundary to Hermosa Avenue with adequate inlet and outlet control shall be required per San Bernardino County Flood District's standards and specifications. The construction cost of the channel shall be credited to the storm drain fees for the project, and a reimbursement agreement will be executed per City Ordinance Ilo. 75 to cover contributions which exceed the amount of these fees. 3. Structural adequacy of the existing wall located easterly of Hermosa Avenue across the channel outlet shall be • investigated and necessary reconstruction of the wall if required, shall be done to the satisfaction of the Flood Control District, 4. All required on -site and off -site right -of -way for the channel shall be dedicated in fee to the Flood Control District. 5. A lot line adjustment to redefine tract boundary between tentative tracts 11731 and 11625 along the channel right - of -way shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map. 6. The portion of the proposed State Highway 30 corridor at the northwest corner as shoo-in on the tentative tract shall have a lot designation as determined by the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22 °D DAY OF APRIL, 1931. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i Richard Dahl, Chairman • : +eso!Jtion Page 3 �f • 1r, Secretary or the Plann my Cgr..mission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoino Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April, 1931 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Sceranka, King, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: "lone ABSE'IT: CO ?iMISSITIERS: Tolstoy • r � J c :.IlF BILIELo?"Em I , I II t04S 0 7-P,'1791 PD. Iw- 14 bVl II ;T IF +.[t C IC I :"i I I F,,R C1 I'PLI1":;FE MD, NE rMLUIPL• .Z., Fa :11 Ilk, A. Jni ,I :C., all ,IF r-11 N111.1", f:,. • I, a 1". IF I CIF 11 11-1111_ "IF FF"I'a cr,011'... rll r: F ILI Clky 1.11II.11F I I I ­ L, IF . ...... IF, . . . . . . I F1 1 root ., i"r, ­I I altlF 6. a of t baft ... d fI1F. AIJ.11cit JoJ tt IF F.j I,., 't Fr, I., 'III U,, I IdMi A .� IF I.:" rl , , . k, :.IC I 1 11 .. 1. .1 L.IIIII", I, : , F-I .11 .T I I I I C". I I IF '. . I " ILL • t". of :1, b""" If Ck, . a":,l I., 1.1d iftaod,kc; :.ern. I, not it., llkl� d , I, If 11"J"t AS Fk_-_ A la III aaal 11 ILLI Ill .... OFF) III ... �.j I I ....... ..... A'IF II, II !..kI I., L t I � S.cF, I , I ; r. 'F, IF., O.,F I; F. I,' t FIFt III 1I.Fli .. t.:, JL. I 1' .­0 1 IF ' . fl?. All I.L I 1•L.111 IIIIII•I It 3 L, 1 1• "a l I', a Ill .1 1 Lt", IF 'I.., IF .,I IF ... .. I :i.. It ILL, ­1 t 3 A', ,z­111111 If ­I L All val.1, I IFI it Frail Lc for i,j,vil•Fl ­Ft, ­11, all rL: ;It. III ko'c' I':' ; " , c " " IF ,, I r, ,, a ­­ II.Fj 1 11 al !11 1,,, I', a!,, 'I . u , 1.c, offLI", it Vu. All ILL, 1J.1.11 IF, : FF I rrr,l Irr IF, 1­11 un 1, .,11 le Id•:u I; 1k, I III I11111L.1 I.. u.r 1. 1. IFIAI'LlIl., pr. al r,". 11 ILL 'all I .1111IFF l"LL' 1. I­FFIFIY "'a I. I Ir"I IF_Fl I If FIlla N. I Far taz I, arit iA I." "..j.-Ct. v ell. S,,L,.,,t, L­­ %•,lh IS I.III I.Iff tiF IIFIIa:Ilvd ca, il I.111 utL n, o", JFL",o:.•,nt a,all Ita For FLO '1­1 LF LF, I1! 1, 1 l". I III., I, 1 1, it", FILL'. If N. fkk I " F., , r lo"Fl, IF. I c'1lLF11cI IF I :"a F F'Ia, I fl a 'IF L lj� I ik, I I I. IF C I, t IF I , , I I `I[ I'll IF --it-' IF 1.Lk-I.l1F IF11.0'r" 1 1, /I I � ILL, I.., F.I., ct P a l l I'll tpt I­ IF I'll I "1 •✓ ✓­1 . 1.11' I:— FL,'t I ;F-ICy calla.. I IFS AtL'11 11111 bl 1" 11 la Ici S tract I L L i t , -t 1 1 1 1 1 L I"-- If I,,, hmtln I I F I, L, 111c4 -1 cc, OF I , I It, 13. LI, u1 Flat— 4 FILL"' 111 ILI T." SIrrIII I" " ILL W. :.I Ina I ',,1 11.1 IF sL III Iccup Lar. , I IF tl,, Flu Sit lan IF 111 m... A da ul. I I If, I " ", FILL r:°, 1.1 Ilan ­111 .1 ::k a,., 1, 1 ILL IF I F IF C I IF I I rL �'a t I , C , , IF '. 1, IF 7., 1* 1 1 k I ;:Fi, :1 k, clll� 'a"n a, a­k" fa . . . . . . . . . . F . . . I I . I I . c and t FILL, city Pl, L Ilk I I ILI,k•] Pat ry r I", I IF I I ,al 11 1 I IF F I I." 111 r kil,`.II inlI F.11 1. I's I I I I I L.III, I I I I In IF, .,,I I I I I I I F l•. Iva I cr I, d, I L I I t IF IF 1 .1 L I , : I tit) I II "k I If I F f I I I I.,. Ill. 11 111 I11F1 IF Ilrr al &0 vro loct no. 2). in t project :D +11 Pr' :,L' _ Verc ; or al,rd,hle hro r nh. nr[ .r c r ...I Pia. wo irr^ m­' r, liogrJ nJlarnq rat lr. 1•' nmd', le at tl,. Iran of I. r.. [:� rr! [ ^r` Urml ";le 1. rntn to r'll, -,I! L, ¢•I•"•. r.J Dr E,%:$1 ItY rlle.ner p r l0 - toan[ a ro fr Ln l INngtWr a lt. All h✓ v, Ili tlar .ltula,l W nJS thllI have d m i m outs id, Jrmrnirnn o Jn,l sell a�. „r Lill. a,IP tent ID VI rIr IrJ 5[all. r�. P'"Itag lot arras s Lill Lr a mvu....m IS gall.. it<e. _ ✓]. All Lm -.,:y au a xr•I; u: 4+11 t i nnnonua of 26 feet wide. _V.."a. ( . vy ...... t ,I I p..: yr IrJ. m 11r 1nre Mee aria elear. i n - 'I Zt La sf all nJ.. n,J cone nmt mn r nWln[ will ou te.il ore In Strictr-,.— n J[[ furr.rn.3 IeIlll 11 -111 1.• rl,tle Striped. -Vol, . All or.,[s"Ill L, ".:,L art r. en L.wnc garage door owners. __ ✓. p` +I`J I :, r,. .a sr.l a„ rt stall be turn DI O[s eJ. _ ✓I. - c Cv' rt.:[LCL rrnY tW 11 r r I e C•.0 vat - :, «Stn C! the alof ar o/ n rt.n nI ncr Irr _�+ �«' toc pf rnCr VIC 5pu rte n! Ir..n'.pn.r tat .,n �� Y ffi rl it am rl it it p.1 ml[�1 r.r lh fhv`n[e e'd J[io ill, .11.11 LLr. '. a.'!I 9•: .I . •.I [ C.�. t (rnJa ^.I P'It' [,:r, r a. we Oar rla „rr .�• mu.r n W ur U :....nnu. �tl rLnr11Jm9 Ycn.n tt. lanai•, ".., ® /_ . A .1e1 r1.'J I,n.r r.',. ,and r ....UO :. Alin than be tuemillm to a,lI i,; Dy Li e ➢ler:..o3 ;; -r o Prr f to the 111olo[x of eullnlny [.• ...1 . . Msl il.le A Ia",r LI +r nr rr r r.rrluca t.a . S.ee Linn type alull s...J nl.n 11n11I r..l ; .• Pr np.. 1.1 rrl ..... . rn {r ....: al.I W tc ry [. I.e.l. [f .. m.n9 rrnr Ilan J5C ann .. . . ,I... t. f•.r . A,,,.o 01 l.j,l trfr The ..lain t . r,l plo J t'+ anal ,eJ el all Plan .nl Di r i i.on ArI [o Lpl•r I..lr I Inn f na gran.r.q {'I an.ra c ] SIr. r Ire.:, e x of IS gallrm sile or larger, null be Linal L.t rn ",,It Ira_ t for IL. ban M a . C'I' ''t 'n1-1 I .nl I^ Irlarl. Ill an rrrage p( ever/ JJ' talennrw rll -1 ur. 1,. a 0 VIJ, A ­o ,r of 50 Ile ; yc rhos [ r ail ri °,,;I ^pr a..J O prr to l,J .. n p. Inc de.clq .�q Ln, or 1 �Is ✓i, All I,r uVl;r r.l a v loa II Dr r ntau.ld Io a L[ p f,c'•• Ir ,n . 1 'Jl lily a,r.l tlr• rry t r,r11l l0nr vrJ:.r li Dana anal JvLr :.. 6. TII slope LJ•ds rn .c a of Lv. (-1 L "t eo reruul L:pl, vrl at 5:1 or q rr.a l.:f 51„I'r :,:II Ic•I r,,,li <a (�•I Jed r : rt..,l 1 r 1I.r nl vr:M1 nrl ,mpm .n tt nl u,.• C pf r I Lc „�I rr u�n sll .I..rl„ I�It r [ ee lull 1. �I to .rlr). roans rr.q r,r mJ tr..,t. :,11 s. o�F Inn,. nj +�,l rrr r.r n •nrll [.' / Frn Wlne "l J ral Ilan anl[urr.lnl[onb Lla.r JerJ lue J:v l..p.+.n trl unto „Irr rah. rl Wort :5 tc 1.1 anJ p r: "1 LY In rel..J al..l• far l•rorY lar b.a pru t5, an [u a'. `[Lan of ton siq s!•rl Le er .>l a [,J L/ tl,c Il Liao r,l Stetf to ,lvrrm. it It rt n In Sot n �r r nr/ C•nJr trr. . L/ ). FI I Nr sYS "'a" a d I.r I, I ly nlrn 1.1 l,.el 1•Y a of n r roll l.:rlln p:lv r : r;,l rD l.` la lr.�� CI[, r 1'r'.fr [« nr to p.v Lt/ p r..r"la I, s,r nR, r,i 1•,i lab nq n,v trnot .a,., Iarenmprng. r.l t il'N.P-n n:• 1 r rq Arlo :+'lam. mall 1•e untvll"I L/ be Jr.c14• r Io a, ,r v. ua unto sat ' n r[l'I 4A Me fn:a) J ..r In of M. 1.r.r In _'[., pall .. CY1. r.nll :. la" l: -ap lnl J „1 S.J"�+1lt bill Le m[In.I.J :n Lrr re l,rir r.l IanJau pt I`Lnn +u.l .lull Lo v Iv[[ [o alr ,ral or 11.1 Plan, rmg 0.rrticr. -__ ❑i. a„ of . of all.: [re” planted rnL.o Liao pre'. [, sn,.11 tv n t.s. ✓ II. :i••.r ..I lar I. rl..e .r.A . .t111I •. In L'nv LN Id nJ i. a; Inq. IS r[glvri, Jim .r.lnl .] r r l." a D. S. y.: lay 5ign4 prnlul :rl for I,,, Jereln: •n, nt ".all De n..t 31.”, Aran. to hr 1. n.. I, Air :.rrn A� r to ..." J LL r., 1lolr% rL ..,.1 al,Prnv: rrU: v : r pn ^ .qL•u uImrr u nd [v: . r' .eL. a"t h Jl L.. .,,.. 11 It am vrmul p. t ^ I: n lu nl1 .. Jm W.n4 p•r..a t. r.r 3. Jle n:') „S n.L.,a:,,L on ate Sall. nll`r1 yl.t r,( r.l ,r. tl. II. pp. I I'd ...11 n. Ilr, :el•a rat rin rre:.m ImJ avl•. n. L. It IS A.I.1 ......1 Dr.rctor n[v ie' tnJn Lc a[conplr;hrn Prior' to toe r.al+n[c nl a Il.rn a.r:q P, r..n 1. z �1. vro n [t Ln. _ 2. Vrr. r I:.: it r::I [..:. .Irsn.J to reCUrda.. of the (rrul ,..: Iry rs In, ,. ✓ 1. A.1 •.•.tl t [ rji 731 5 9re [rJ 5:111 r[[ to Itrr ........I 1:1lt o ... r,'C,r lr t renal Il:f Yrrnrrt :. ni• rIGG 'I I ,)r..:.J to , "r"od or [)•!sl +t Y I., n (. rs .1 �.1 .aY yJl cr Jv'le ta` cur ui[lur,i or rr rofJ I111'.a 4- 111. 1I. :rrfl.r r r n C IJ rn le, nrun.t., sian"I sIJ OVr ent ty rr., cra o/ I5 . ., . rr:.- J ,:r \rt:• nr p.:II lr: [, otr In tr a I on or In r[nnr v•. r.. ' 1,...J .1 lo[ haft c . I it n.l . r, i.l : 1 11 :,:rl r.:[ IJ :::511111 ra ryroi.rl n[ 1 r (r a r.. it ... rr r) t1 est lan !r lfrc, I., Sn., S I , nit r..+ to f 1 1 $ Lr tLC .:.11.1.1 .1 tR the cl ty pr lur to a +6. 1x [nc lrml 1,19 It or prior to wwa of 1.•IrL.ra no r wrl yr rl. vn t[en arr[+t non... fr rlI i : .111 1,: v11111 t I I.r C r lr Il Arto .111: •-.111'1:•11 srl r. r., 1.1.11 l yhool yro Ill iurn 1^111 rfr [rl r[It rr.r r::t I.. r:• L:'.I, i nit, LY I[ty' $c111, fls tr lc[ Mi 11:111 r (Yl) [ r tl'. frn +l r.ri JISI11, 11 rn [ne [ of 1It • ,Ip III. 1.....e,.. .f 1r [z 111 Vf tale of ,rl lso O.er ru iJcnl ial L. nel " ". III Irr or 1. 11.e n r,t .rle rnq: ,.d vrJ. ti flea 1. +r.o.. . of .1 . 11..: . .:I' Ir.r r.J�.11,: Lm l n res:r Y {':I rt r IL',Ir 1 Prr l'St. tin 11 tf I'll ,. It t. tr to I`. ` 1.11..1 C• - .. le. .0 lr•.• 11[11 Pitt" In.,st b." 1'.11 1 u'.I L1• r ..t•• :I n Vr rn- [n tln,I .r r�r 11 I' .r1: n It 1111 It lal r. .J N'1.•,<: ,iL ut 1. nr Srllbr r rr :l 'r I'.n 1. u: L'..l..l .111.1 11 .` Clt r...r I(I r.. of ] .I lltil. ;1,.11 nrj 1111 SuVVJY IIVi Ilrl or Y.J{run, Sll.rll [e cytJ UU t d...l ;vl [at[rJ U U.- CI[,. r ..II uld.gId if tnr tentnrr ,.11.'11 , n.Jt a t nJ r t,rl : q p. .:ts •'.I . ,. .rl .•.I. ^Ir . 1•. 'v' `1.'1 [:. . 511 el 11 I" .[• u.l r... r r .ro... r. .r. +.1, '..'1�1/ In, t•I :nn ,..) I.. n. ..Ir.... _ 9. D'1. 51141:.1 n .ry .1,t t..t I,n 111.1 vs a tot I do- lorrx C:c i an -, s rl t 11^I'VI Y•l:.r a 1 1 1 .... rr l J ti ve to 'hi, I1'S:: t n „I u. •.•r .r u:' t 11..1111 r I, 1.r lu 1Ind r:.JI . tt racn,5r I or LL1. v +V 1r tl., a „L.h vl .l n,r q., r.) to Ee Jevelot'J as bd t nnm 3 I: i, .r slrnl w;r.:a I.c .:'It oI r. ,r I, nln'I F . ,u I l,.... F. r ..Irr'nf 1..'111 vul I Lit IJ 1 r • rr l: r JI t. 1•. rf, 1'i rtl v_ .I - W-t ;Irll l.•'irl il!(f.I lu lt: In 111::1 l Or .l.r..t ,i :r.. t'rel l.:l`• frL' rri r.11 Im II rVr ..5:,,r a a.nill.k : '.I of r. er rtu n .. yr.ro, 11:11 rs..... vel N rr.r Ic In. + n; a Irrr Jr „•I Ir fur r u rr (Isf r .r 1111 ...... tr. n[r (rrt .rt 11: tl ILll r '. nn) il. tl. �, lrra t `111 Iris r.l n I it, In•. I. I' : l bt, le nn p. '[ [ -d Pi Pin (t , [ \rny F, .1 I', ,,I I, _:. ��• __,_•1. I'rr.:r"I It rStr.u.nnl.l I, it, 15 lcn to at. J�:r ' 1 [Irs r J' 1+5'..'[ r )r r. .r,: lr r , �1'� Ir,• ., r C' on. tray lets- it It r I ...1 r.. rr. 11115 ..Irrrf 1`yr oy':u lf. 1 .rl .r � \I LnbnrJ 1. rr ,,:r I.., .., 11 „r: r. „1 u1 u.' 1.,11, r,r c11I Irr1; •.1 :.. r.., :.,. ,: u n.r l.r Iv. ,rr, v:l lr:.- r.:r.u...:. .. ,r ,.r :.l rr.l it r n:,:r .•• a I Ln r It I I... .: 11 L.nr L. t9 r ...ly rr nt Lrr lJ r.l .nl 2•. lo,r r r. q.rl tl 11:1. rur W mu.r bJ u t er V: r. ^rl Jrr.l 5.111 I. . + rl r• I , i b.. :. lY x.14 .r urru l.n 1111. ra t. rll .I 1111 bu i,r l.r ,. .•.•.• I. srr l.l:.t m: yfr tr sretl pr r •n 111,1 .r r <u.. r Ir rrl r,r i 1:11:1 r ,rr ;1.111 Le 'c. 111,1: rr rntc .r [Ir ll. 1�'la ..:r.J I- ...... t :L rll I.• ,rr rynr e.l Li o rl - nlr:reJ enY ru [er Irc 11.11 St It, .1 (.111 L1rn,, to yfr ft). Ial t 111.1. A qr ..L, W rl rel•.nt 51.:11 L, le rl .0 r.l LY .1 rp.II 111.1 rrnlur....r nr ryo l n' i.J 5..11.1 t t:J Jt Il:.' t f :.i Vl rt Jf rnn Itr r.1 in Ir ",t 'r 11 ' .l 5115 .. SI ' 1111 f [ yl r � nl l•' .rl I.Y :t•- nd Lv .rrru r r zuJ n,. : -tr 1[Vr v In "la[ ul '1p a of La11r11 ng Ir ..... [ 1.111 [Lev n,.r, '.Ill- n�lr[ orY.lrn;ra n, tLV IJl"rr,. SA.rI ff rtD,r[vlo J 1� a:,la l[IJ a rl r lr'... r[rt• rnrl r rryl•I J• ilr r• 1 Imlr t [., [II i•[r\Irr r. lr.n r. tl.... r•rl Jr ^J r'J JI yJr•r la. •SJ . _5 '.brft n'J OJ ICt/ Or v11110 n. 6. _ _ L o, Irrll to.et r re. r,.. .�I.A !II va fr .L Zl, ^tal r( Jra nagr J. r. 1., Irn t'J. �i r M1 C. H. ' t 1 all r t, o v Itnc VU rls. [u 1.e Jrl l•, na,r.....I L, rrS:�r tOUrlJ rLrvl „Lr. Laa. a •:.I tb'Ln„ lr crl hry It r.n ' r,aw b.. r.r. rr..•.y tlrr t rrl .r ,.l'P Url nn.l L! [ C rnf ea rn .•rr y r :I rra.[t.a 2. M1 Y uu^ f. l'.rr -[rrC Jr un.r.p. _ _ _ • rr•r rn, ..n nl %.r I,.,.1 ,•r • r: Rr ^,•. r'. n;s, nef essm'Y r4r JerrJ [rnuq 4r Ln y..l rvnl'••r errs. _. rr lLl nL .a/ aitlt I [em.�r.. o'.1 f eJ �. `rClmrl:, 1 It.r L.J p^L•flrng .ne t4 ne infb l!en r rtt rnu y ,[all J5 J. Gael •.11 �.. .r r of •urY w f i I rr. ur f atr•'..t.: t... rr _- ,[ m L nrr' trnr 1 tal lrr, J vu3 1 rru,.r4.a'r.n rr.,.u:.. rins t I• +ra rl fr lJ Lr.., rn lr.•ru.l. ...ry rrr. ^r url E La tr.,t rnC lr•.I•n. ln: l\ 1. 1.•1 rr.,t rrr .. nr.lr a t,r.r l:l•ny rennr[ 1 •S tr :l. r - -lf J lrr SIG •1•.: tl a:,r 'I to LC � b'CL A ILL ��- - "atl I C IL.Il tl 11 1' 1 I 1 .IIEI 1 _ . SrI.VC L;'d to tIP t rllr I fJn , mrSJm•J tL+ut I -- - .I- 1 .Ill rr r.Ilr l.riral lln;rta -/ r 11r E4 rle r9D• .t - t ite ) N„ - RMPSA ✓_ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ I ✓ _ ;11 1 ca, Ire rl 1 JnJ ul rtl 1 f.jl !tl In.rn _I rve 1 [ tnnrl r lL Irll lr rr - I cr.aanv rnu ntf. 1 ir. I I•• - teau aul ev nt01lrt 4r ' � •t to - — I fluJet IJ^J, CJr I • ^I IC :IS It Llll.CI if f. II 1'.]p -It lsln, FOR fp ^p110.1 CE r1aJ rr Pt Jr nn .r -_- V 1 r, a, .Il pl illf 101 IfrIIILf. - "- to a'ry :.nrt [a• ° "1 :..: r_[•L runt ':..Ir s1 II I�rG r '.I rn tl.. p I'rrJ J,..l an rn, r•nllfl rr'rr an_l •_f al rr rot �'r (rtY rr. ]al :..•rr•t .. Rr lr[r'. rn __I- C. :rC,: r[.c: sl •. Ir, .r l.lrt r.:n ca .r a. r. 1 ,rt, r 5. Stnal r'• rll aL .,Y JnJ •11 n1` F5 rl r of ell m[e r sLe rr,J lilt rlrnl .x ,rr •- u,Pr nt ICI rn �^ r lri (rJ Crl, rl, as vl. an Dn [nr Jt rva[ •a V. ^Rr f.ry 1 E411 rtnlrr n. •. r• 1r 'J tvlll lf' rlar X 2• .�I! r all rr ,�L y1J^i J^J^tt. l.• r'o u :. o •n E ,n ,. .... °'ti r• v.rll b_..r. 'r1,,rrnLt lra rl lurl rlra nl4,:o "•'l stn.F... lr<rbv.. ro /E zb.r .hC lol to �r • n•J lE_ 1( o d.. JII 1 ulrl .r y nr (..r 'Ir HE�^%Of2_AvF. .L_ 6. Srr rtY Nrll Le p.,ar J J ° ( ��rr� t .,l rr r fr,lr .r I: '.: � -_ r.a Il,r'C DI L,e „` � - .r•'.. rl 1..( a _ _ ! f V Icfaan,C ul Lur l'L �• r.,L _ __ _ •.. rr L.•rt a.J 1•e•.r lt. n•I�,ar i'r 1 r r tf” Z l •Iea "• '.nr,. .,nl Lr ra irvJ na. cl b sunrldrns. rol .K dl tc rre[ - rr.rr•n'ror _ J. cll r Gh frig rr. m or,Jll le nLrl lrl or .,•r :Le [rnn /rm "'Al tr "Ill" "d 0. P.r .vf•vayb r.l [r. •____ - -%� Sl rr •l. ' __ ___. Ir.lallt tr a(NC ,I: •.I r. ad .rrl ltvl .r.0 rq.r 1 ,rl v r.Jl E,. r..n; o u., Olr G r „•.r. 4-1 ovrr _ P "s4rinq J C... to !^I AI g. - --- Io p[I ^•J cllt rL r.l ra "'1 r' '••R' +t rofil II Lr ut acJ ron c .•[n JI r r rnr ••, v:c,',r anu r -_ a •nt wi to f•'I1 otIL ;n Iao r. ,•'I r .n,,,t _ :da r i, rr J e. i u„ ,ri nl n ica :c rli la Jr :LC I^grr z aoleo noo, +rev n<1 r SSJVI tlt rt! rJ x[r- „rrr n of ae r. 1. [:� .nt.•r 11 Ee u t oaI r p rc. 'r [Y rn !r _� 0:- •...r.n Jf ou.ls In Ire prc VDSN t 4 ). Lut rn c15. rlr Jra rna.IP 1: .ter rJ.r ar, -r!, r, r.•a• :r ..l ri fr.l.. .abt ;rlr r LvJ rn t: f.n [ro, rrJ SI J11 l•I rnelL V�l or notr: rJ JIm Sllall EP ra'rlY lfeJ -i ral ar.v t. Y `- II' Err ntrJ trl J., It tfrCJfJnJI +n. X_ B. nll ;r Ilr,.,t I 1 u•v45 all m. , �r s t „L c t varw l:; e. rl rn t vLr t.Ivl u•rJ,.r '.r I•.at rr.l,l lyd tun vt r..:rrJ,. •, Rm!<Ie rmoJRurato ur. II. Jtwrr u,•rir lo,InrD Vrrn ;o f49 natf `S rC "14- "r •S rl'tln nJ:o a r• l for Ir rl l..r r [rI •.1 ( I[Cl �l.r. MI „�rC 5rJ[u]I155^L:.a', D.,AI rC r L'S 31rJ I1 to Jrrl la ene [tr 'J [ed m to CI r alar, rrr/ ,u ..,ra .'•.I r. n '.r3 Irr., rrryo t' I Y yri vdte Vr rrr [Y. 34J IIr - ba r Le :.l.nr a,l. rLrr. r.G re. p.r..n, rlr 4 �� • r _J r� r`. Malagr aM ilrall r. xu nl ...l: 1 mm nslnn Of .11 m sit! Jura r• faJirt ,.. .......... ny III C>ty [nq rnn r. � _ 1. In1 +riRUtn ".'e, ..I) LO rr•rrrn'J at tM• fo llax lnq lotrtlnry: %�_ J. Is.• pnrnir.l Pro lr,t M1IIS mllun .>reai bqf uleJ as aob)"t In Ile. Illna mWrr ll..• it, UI,.a 111 d Iniur > err rrpgr.rm and is sob,,,, in X_ "I pr uv rs runs of ", -'I Lroi.evc n: [.IY llydrnan[e 1b. 1's. X_ A. A d""Ir LAanx•1 m.Ver "o"ll I'olsr tlon wall viii be leq..I- i to prnl.Cl lM 51!11 to, l Uy I;%,.,, nny lee, ruMlI to It Pee is, or to a s ton. d. ni.. .x 3. Ap +.rlr rrn 11,11 0:' a.p- for a Cceptauce end diyl.,A JI wrixa Jae,., rabr rng I, rrel .rerf,o. dl.,—t , l a. lei ter of acc:Pmnn• In,a Jr.- "It'eam pmplrly aanee dull to !eyes red 111:re rumll IrcI ", we't Ilu.n o,rto private properties. N. 1- "AwaSA AV. al.m iY a14. b.n of ry1J aa11alor' vote! tarryily -' S4rc u1 [rxp flood tsl Lrcial L>:,•.ir irl..r; Lr nl:Lr-). nllvd sorer[ cunneclinns. (lend pu1!'(tinn 'A I".. andlor' la.u:zcai'•'J errtn ot'r.s loJ !-111,1 JlivewYl at properly I ln.:. 1M 1011uun) sp.n• J,airl >ba 11 pd ins la 11.4 10 1M sallsl.lctlol of tAe [rll (nl rue..,: /i S. poor In r itr i of "I 119. a ofuad -se -Ile OldrolJ911 and drainogo I .l, ter tnerpm le_, sn>II LL I.t:ul{f0 1. the City I'M 'r for 111.1, _X 1 —� Pmv[de all atil«% serace5 to each lot mclydidp sanitary severs . w ter, Noctfa M>•ur, III. teleplmne . . a 'able w)erislnn conduit. all It ilru..i .I tlan u.• tru p._I 51+11 to mo 111,1 n...l.".m:J 11thLnj uUblles alnwl o.l +r vteru is lest lMn 11 I•!. Utility ratrr:ene V.all Or ".v.a'J td the spe<il ica lion of tort se.vrg .111,1, ccoluncs .nd «e Call engineer. tFVrlOprr loall t, rclNalell for the rel ocatim eI e+i st lop pups is u111011es. of Itoulfed. r.., 11 -1,1 iMll to r-,so -, blw or u:r irr.laliem. or street Ilgl...... In iILO'danlO nIlh 'IsI M'in calif -rnia Edison Cavil., III CItY ftd Ml.IrJf. Wte, JM s r -tans tall i.,• drtigned and [ ntlrueled to err[ "'loor:mis -I 1M Cr. -I-1a (rood, Ater Diltrldt IC(aD), foothill Ive betritl and e¢ lnvirormnntal Dcalth frWrivoL Or IM C-only a rI San ir"rdimr. A 1Itlef or cny.11.l. I. CM .111 lot rn,vired pier 1. M[- ntleru, li• nove" be not been srculrrl Irm all .1(1(11., and other inMr<sgJ ege.eles 1n.Olvrrl. 04 veral of tae flail anp vill W S"J"t to any rivIvilreeve" IAat ..y be rcce ivN f1w tDelt. JC p. t. J( s. XO _)_C R. 0. • 5� a i It. to.__m I4. 1 M hq,r n l rr_ „ 5 1. pe..ls> Inn u(n,r ay.nC." ell re ... wr,1 Is f..11w... A. Cal"In, is. _s/ C. Cmnu% r..nl q.t It acnl 1)syulurd Vr iJ� lip r , I•I n C. 5.,n Il rrnrrJrna Coont, MI., 1•,11•.:1 lilt!r.l y 01 h..r- --------- _/5- y. A c,,y or Inn Cn' /meet., ConJitinn an -I A".0" ,00A".0" of In t., rl ll:n Of UO I':_, .orr5 to Lne a"'Is,I) m to' City Arl.,nay. s,>n D.: and a ,orr Naardm to tle City. Ito urr5 n,n _X 3. !teal Da reel and Iraet nips s,a 11 aoo,.r. to City Itandni JS .uJ procedure. A Parcel wp sMlt 00 recordeJ prior to first phase sol.,vision to y prevent -eels nn of uvttugu iJ!J panels. p.3. hfur 10 rvcn rrla l inu. a Ilne(e of Inlenstnn I. lean laM it Jlx and l Dist Phil en 111 La' r1 IeJ r. stn 1.... Ci IY 1'r.o nc il. ,D, eng.. -e, I., It", 1n'gl wd in Dn vl,l IorniUOo sW 11 De I.n ne Dr tH drvel pl•ar, {. All penm•'p`r LmJ:npnl I.arl.y, ere rv, 'I'd t0 De ,to 1. 1 nr lu tlr tau lf, q.e uyiuleoan:e dnlri(L. 1, la'dL(ap i`y I.., Irr ",site t /!ton: r,1011i to b: in.lull,d on in t. InnJ /nni"I" pel,ext" OC 0-1 t,n't aria 41,111 I [,or r.... xr:ly In,u Ir.: llod. r ra 1 nnc nt t t;i, ! -J LY Inc illy In .I .nn. u ... :a ra' i1, x. c d'i tr', t. J 1 I\ j RESOLUTION 10. 84 -26 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO C'JCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, DENYING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11781. WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.83(b) of Ordinance 28 -B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described tentative tentative tract. WHEREAS, The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission finds that the tentative tract described herein is in conflict with the directions of the City's Development Code. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby denies a time extension for Tentative Tract 11781, Roberts Group. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th DAY OF APRIL, 1964 . PLANS U 1MI SS ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCXMONGA Dennis L Stout, Cnairman ,1.4 ATTEST: I� Ric''6 Gomez, Deputy ecretary I 1, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City -of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of April, 1984 by the following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, STOUT, JUAREZ, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: McNIEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • A. TI'Mr 3X=;S:J:! =OR '*:; ^ „TI7E TRACT 1191 - R03ERTS GROUP - A total resiaen�.al davelopmenc of 76 condom niums on 6.4 acres of land in the Medium aes,-den.ial (4 -i4 du /ac) District located on the west side of Her-osa, approximately 330 feet north of 19th Street - APN 202- 171 -29 6 38. Commissioner 3arker asked the -City Attorney what repercussions would result if the Planning Commission acted to approve, deny, or approve with modirications, the time extensions on the Consent Calendar, Mr. Dougherty, City Attorney, replied that the basic issue is whether the Planning Commission desires to have the Development Code apply in cart or in total for the ten ative maps that are being considered for extension at this meeting. Mr. Dougherty stated that Development Code section 17.02.020, subsection C -7, has a grand fatheri ng clause which allows the property under a tentative map to develop under the ordinance in effect at the time of tentative map approval, assuming that it occurs within the time limit permitted within the life of the tentative map. He further stated that if the map expired, the new Development Code would apply and would govern any approval of the new map on the property. Mr. Dougherty stated that the question raised is whether the City, in granting an extension to a previously approved tentative map, can add new or revised conditions and was taken up in El Patio vs the Permanent Pent Control Board in Santa Monica. Mr. Dougherty further stated that the Court of Appeal held that the City could not, as a condition of extension, add any new conditions to the • previously approved tentative and the Court ordered that the final map be approved without the conditions that the Santa Monica Planning Commission attempted to add. Mr. Dougherty stated that this limits the cities' ability in flexibility of action. He further stated that if an extension is granted to Item A, and assuming that the builder builds within the time period in effect at the time of the tentative, the old ordinance would control. Additionally, if the Commission denies the extension and the map expires, the new Development Code and other regulations on the new map would control. Commissioner Barker stated that the subject report indicates that this tentative was reviewed for conformity with the new Development Code and staff indicated that in the areas of energy conservation, recreational amenities, interior and side setbacks, and landscaping, it is not in conformance with the new Development Code. He indicated that the question very simply is do we accept this with all the conflicts or does the Commission deny it and make the developer aware he will have to come back and present a plan which would conform with the Development Code. Planning Commission Minutes 2 April 11, 1984 • Chairman St-It stated that he has concern with tnis specific project because he and others are serving on the 19th Street corridor studv and the possibility exists that in the near rUture there may be a change in the Genera'_ Plan for this area. He indicated that it is surrounded by single family dwellings and the piece across the street may be low density and his concerns are primarily those centered on a change to the General Plan :'or this area. Mr. Tom 'Winfield, attorney with Brown, Winfield, and Canzoneri, representing the Roberts Group, stated that the El Patio case as it is being couched is somewhat unique. Further, that the final trap was approved with conditions attacned and thereafter the property owner objected to complying with the conditions which were imposed. Mr. Winfield stated that the grandfathering provisions of the Development Code were a legislative determination by the Council so that people with tentative tract map approval, who were moving forward in a reasonable course of conduct, would not be caught short and have the rug pulled out from under them. He indicated that this is exactly the position that his clients find themselves in if the extension is denied. Further, that another tentative map has been extended for this single development and if this one is denied, it would create many problems for his client. He indicated that both parcels are owned by the same party who will be developing it as a single project. This is not a situation, he said, where the developer has bought a piece of land for speculation, has sat back doing nothing on the property, and is asking for an extension at the last minute. He indicated that the economy has been such where development has been infeasible. Mr. Winfield stated that if the City Attorney is asked what position the Commission is in, he would state that you could condition the map with the client's participation and agreement but he did not know how the E1 Patio case would affect this. He also cited other recent Supreme Court rulings. Mr. Winfield felt that energy considerations could be met by his client if they are allowed to move forward and indicated that while they may not install energy saving water heaters in the development, they would install the plumbing for solar heating and would meet the energy requirements with regard to the swimming pool. Commissioner Barker stated that there is a rumor that Mr. Winfield is working on an alternative plan. Mr. Winfield replied that it may be a rumor, but he has no understanding or this. Chairman Stout stated that even if the applicant were to consent to the additional conditions, the 'el Patio case is saying, that they do not have to conform. Planning Commission Minutes 3 April 11, 1984 Mr. Winfield stated that in E1 Patio there had not been anv discussion and is • was approved; whereas, tonight there was discussion and agreement that the cond.t'_cns soul] be adhered to. He indicated that there is nothing that says a development cannot be approved with conditions. Mr. Dougherty stated that El Patio did involve a tentative xap and the order of the court was that a final maD be approved or processed for approval. Further, the authority for extension comes from Government Code, Subsection 6645.26 and is part of the Subdivision Map Act and the basic time period governing the life of the map is found in that section. Mr. Dougherty stated that the City has the option of adding 12 months onto that basic time and additional extensions not to exceed 3 years. in effect, a map given every possible extension can last as long as 6 years. "Ir. Dougherty stated that the legislature limited the time so that if future changes are made in development codes, the cities could apply the new law. He indicated that the E1 Patio case stated that the discretionary extensions up to three or four years is simply that, discretionary with the Council or with the Commission. He stated that the Commission has the discretion of making these determinations and his belief is that regardless of the developer's agreement to the conditions, the Commission lacks power to add more conditions whether the developer agrees to it or not, and the Commission would be taking on good faith what the developer is saying without any hold at all that the conditions would be complied with. Mr. Winfield stated that the staff report indicates that the conditions may be optional. • Mr. Rick Gomez, City Planner, explained the Mandatory and optional standard provisions of the Development Code as they relate to density and design considerations. Mr. Winfield stated that the real issue here is not whether the City is imposing additional conditions, but whether the grandfathering provisions of the Development Code apply and whether they might have a right to waive a portion or the City would have the right to change the Development Code and limit, modify or extend the Development Code and go through the proper legislative process. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -26, denying a time extension for Tentative Tract No. 11781 - Roberts Croup. Commissioner Me Niel dissented, indicating that this is a negotiable situation and he felt that the axe fell quickly, thereby doing unnecessary damage. B. TIME ERTE:ISI .1- ?9R- .25.3T1TT_75 "ACT 10825 - !0:1'( ^EVELo?ME7T - A total residential development of 2 ;'tn;s _, amily units, 31 patio homes and 202 townhouse units on 57.7 acres of land loZ^ited_ between Haven and Hermosa, approximately 660 feet south of Wilson - APN 26T- 13, 14, 02, 63 65, and 69. Planning Commission Minutes 4 April 11, 1984 �n� • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 16, 1984 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - WE a 'eve opment a a coin- operate car wash on acres of land in the General Commercial District located on the southeast corner of Foothill and Helms - APN 208- 261 -54. SUMMARY The applicant has requested an appeal to the Planning Commission decision to deny a Conditional Use Permit request for a coin- operated car wash. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of April 11, 1984, held a Public Hearing to consider the request and found that the request was not consistent with the Special Boulevard character of Foothill Boulevard. The Commission felt the basic problem was that the site is too small for what is proposed and that a car wash use is inappropriate for Foothill Boulevard. The Commission's decision to deny the Conditional Use Permit was based mainly on the General Plan policies for Special Boulevards to promote a center concept and previous Planning Commission policy regarding service commercial use, such as, automobile service station bays, repair and tire shops, car washes, and similar uses to be designed with service bays facing away from intersections or the Special Boulevard. The General Plan policies encourage commercial centers as opposed to strip commercial development that results from proliferation of service commercial users. The Planning Commission was concerned that any deviance from these policies would be setting a precedent for other areas within the City. Attached for your review and consideration is the Planning Commission staff report which fully outlines the policies and issues applicable in this case. Also attached is a copy of the Commission Resolution and minutes of the meeting of April 11, 1984. r CITY COWI IL STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -01 - !Jest • May lo, 1984 Page Z RECOMMEADATIO1 The Planning Commission recommends denial of the appeal request based upon the findings contained within the Resolution, RespLtfully,su�,itted: Rick Grimeaj City Manner Attachments: Appeal Letter from Applicant Planning Commission Staff Report - April 11, 1984 Planning Commission Resolution of Denial Planning Commission Minutes - April 11, 1984 • • 0 I� �J Christopher M. {Vest 518 17th Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Res. (714)536 -0650 Bus. (714)592 -4450 RE: Coin operated car wash. Case number: C.U.P. 84 -01 With respect to the City Concil: I Chris West here by request an appeal for the decision made by the Planning Commission dated the 11th day of April 1984. it is my feeling that my proposed project is the best possible use for this property and the staff report submitted to the Planning Commission has no basis for their recommendation. Further it is also my intention to modify said project to elim- inate my opposition. Thank you, Chris West CITY OF R NCRO CUCq ONGA ADMINISTR; TION APR 25 1wA AM S191n111112111Epii4i5j6 A r CITY OF RANCHO Ci;CI,.IONGA STAFF REPORT W� D47E: -•oril 11, J934 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRO!-I: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Can Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -01 '.:EST - The deveiooment of a coin operated car wash on .45 acres of land in the General Commercial district located on the southeast corner of Foothill and Helms - API! 208 - 261 -54. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Reauested: Approval of Conditional Use Permit, site plans, elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of a coin operated coin wash. C. Location: Southeast corner of Foothill and Helms (Exhibit 7AI 0. Parcel Size: .45 acres. E. Exist ina Zon in a: General Commercial F. Existing Land Ilse: Vacant. G. Surroundina Land Use and Zon in 2. Nor[n - Commercial; Genera Commercial South - 'Woolworth Garden Center; General Commercial East - Perry's Market; General Commercial West - Vacant; General Commercial H. General Plan Desionations: Project Site - General Commercial North - General Commercial South - General Commercial East - General Commercial West - General Commercial ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 34 -01 - WEST April 11, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: Site slopes to the south at approximately a 2p grade and is vacant. Curbs, gutters and paveaent improvement exists on Foothill & Helms. This parcel is the remainder of parcel map lot split that created the 'Aoolwortn Garden Center to the East and South. J. Aoulicable Regulations: The Development Code permits coin -op car 4asnes in the General Commercial District; CUP required; 18 parking spaces required. II. ANALYSIS: A, General: Because of its unique operating characteristics, coin - ooerated car washes were conditionally permitted in the new Development Code subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission of a Conditional Use Permit. The Conditional Use Permit process is intended to afford an opportunity for broad public review and evaluation of the site • development requirements and operating characteristics of certain uses which require special consideration in order to operate_ in a manner compatible with surrounding uses. The Plannina_ Commission is authorized to grant Conditional Use Permits to achieve these purposes and impose reasonable conditions to ensure that all site development regulations and performance standards are provided in accordance with the Development Code and General Plan. Typical conditions may include requirements for special setbacks, buffering, fences, screening, regulation of vehicular ingress and egress, regulation of hours, or other characteristics of operation. The primary issue for this request is the compatibility and appropriateness of the coin - operated carwash use for this particular location and at an intersection along a Special Boulevard. The Planning Commission should review the size, shape, access and topography of the site to assure that it is appropriate for the development of a coin- operated carwash facility. PLAN'IM C01Mt -0ISSIXI STAFF REPORT CUP B4 -01 - WEST • April 11, 1984 Page 3 The project site is less than 1/2 acre in size and is approximately 196 feet deep and 100 feet wide. The new Development Code would require a minimum site area of 40,000 square feet except for parcels created within shoppinq centers where a master plan has been developed and appropriate easements granted for reciprocal access and parking. During the review of the 'Woolworth's Garden Center and related parcel map, a conceptual corner site plan (Exhibit "G ") was developed which indicated a 5,000 square foot building located on the corner. The proposed site plan for the carwash as shown in Exhibit "H" is substantially different from the previously approved corner site plan. To minimize potential traffic conflicts on Helms, the Engineering Division recommends that the northerly drive approach on Helms Avenue be located a minimum of 100 feet from Foothill Boulevard, as shown on Exhibit "B ". However, this would result in only 28 feet between the two driveways which could create further confusion and traffic conflicts. Therefore, the Engineering Division recommends that a only a . single 50 -foot wide drive approach be provided on Helms, as shown on the alternate sketch, Exhibit "D ". This is intended to reduce traffic conflicts on Helms Avenue caused by stacking of vehicles if the carwash is full. The conflict occurs where northbound traffic on Helms Avenue attempt to make a left turn onto Foothill and cars making a right turn from Foothill onto Helms attempt to enter the carwash. To offset these vehicles, the Engineering Division recommended the single drive approach at the southwest corner of the project site. However, this results in interior circulation problems on the site during peak use hours. The carwash has seven car washing bays and the site could accommodate a stacking of approximately five or six vehicles on the west side of the building. Additional patrons would be forced to wait in line out into the driveways and onto Helms Avenue, park in the detail area along the east property line, or park in the 'Woolworth's par'<ing lot until a car wash bay became available. • PLAN IING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • CUP 34 -01 - 'd EST Aoril 11, 1934 Page 4 The second issue is the visibility of car washing bays from Foothill 3oulevard. Past Planning Commission policy has been to require automobile service station bays, repair and tire shoos, carwashs and other similar uses to be designed with the service bays facing away from intersections or Special Boulevards. The applicant intends to provide a 4 -foot high stacco screen wall with berming and landscaping along Foothill and Helms Avenue. However, Foothill Boulevard sits three to four feet higher than the pad elevation of the carwash facility. Therefore. the effect of a screen wall would be minimal for traffic on Foothill Boulevard. Further, the drive approaches on Helms Avenue provide additional visibility into the carwash bays. The size and shape of the property precludes reorienting the building to mitigate this concern because the building is open on both sides. The Development Code requires a minimum 5 -foot wide landscaped strip along the south and east property lines. This planter should include at least one 15- gallon size tree per each 3 • stalls. Along the east property line, a 4 -foot high wall would separate this project from the planter in the 'dool•worth's parking lot. No on -site planters are provided, as shown in Exhibit "B", along the south and east boundaries. B. lesion Review Committee: The Committee expressed severe concern witn t'ne appropriateness of the carwash use along Foothill Boulevard, however deferred the consideration of this issue to the full Planning Commission. The Committee has worked with the applicant to resolve concerns relative to the site plan layout, roof design, and screening. The site plan has been revised to provide a minimum of 20 feet of landscaping as measured from curb face along Helms Avenue, as shown in Exhibit "B ". The Committee recommended that extensive mounding and landscaping be provided along both street frontages, in particular, berming against the screen walls with creeping vines or shrubbery along the walls facing streets to discourage the possibility of graffiti. The roof design was revised to repeat the small mansard roof element on the north end of the building, Exhibit "F ". Colored renderings of the project as viewed from Foothill Boulevard will be available at the Public Hearing. I* PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 24 -01 - 'WEST April 11. 1934 Page 5 C. Environmental Revie.i: Based upon the initial study, staff has determined that this project may have a significant impact upon the environment in terms of creating an aesthetically offensive site. To mitigate this concern, the applicant has provided screen walls, landscape berms, and an architectural style compatible with the surrounding area. III. FACTS FOR FIND11GS: oefore approving a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission must make the following findings: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the District in nhich the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or we if are, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable • provisions of the Development Code Further, the Planning Commission should consider whether the size, shape and topography of the subject site is approoriate for the proposed use. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing Tin The Daily Reoort newspaper. The property was posted and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. The adjacent 'Aool.iorth Garden Center has objected to this project on the basis that it is not appropriate for this particular location. No further correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. OPTIONS: The Planning Commission may select from the following options: 1. Approve the CUP. 2. Continuance to allow for revisions. 3. Deny the CUP. • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • CUP 84 -01 - :JEST April 11, 1984 Page 6 VI. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all material and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the -Facts for Finding and Conditions of Approval, adoption of the attached resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. If the Commission cannot support the Facts for Finding and Conditions of Approval, a Resolution of Denial has been provided. Resoectf,plly gmitted, Rick Gi z City/ Planner i rG:DC:ns {Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Man • Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Alternate Site Plan Exhibit "E -1" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E -2" - Section AA Exhibit "F" - Elevations Exhibit "G" - Previously Approved Corner Site Plan Exhibit "4" - Proposed Corner Site Plan Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions Resolution of Denial 0 As Of this last •eel: 1 had the TL7 O-nortun4-.%, Ic the C31- Desian �eview and 'eolo=ent Review ­j c itt�cs. �ased on those meet - ings it is an anent to me that � have the il_^e desires as noes the C_,ty of liancll CUC�=,=Cia to protect t::e intool.rity annl� the desires of the CntY by LuJ'dlng only noteworth*, (IOVCIOhMcn-S on Foothill Boule- vard. In the last three •ears I have taken great time and effort not to mention invest--ten's is change the image of most coin-oper'ateil, car Washes that 1,aVe been :1cvelOZS 1 0. i. the early GCs an 705. 1 have and will continue to build only -the state of the art coin- oporatcd car wa2hos to prove that they can he a desireaL-le and com- patible asset -0 not Only the driving public but to ad(7 to the quality of the city that I have the Opportunity to hil4l! in. In the recent past I have bta�n,:,4 three conditional use 7 e crmits in areas that Were thought to be only designated for high quality com- mercial huildin-s but I have proven that the tvnc of buildings that house the car washes care very clean and attractive and therefore are very appealing to not only the city but to the customers that patron- ize the facilit,.. As with every individual project it has certain detriments that must be overcome in order to be a successful business. In meeting with the Desigs. Review and Development review not only are their thoughts and comments appreciated but easily accommodated with plans that I have in mind. Great care and planning has been put into this project includ- ing the thought of customer stacking and parking, tine spent in the car wash, turnover of the car wash, and based on ol.:r market study and feasibility study, we have added two additional car wash bays in order to eliminate excessive stacking in waiting by customers in order to keep cars and traffic down to a minimum and Provide a better ser- vice to our customers. A very important asset to the car Wash and business is to be able to have the approval of the Planning Commission and Traffic Department to allow two access driveways on Helm Street in order to keep the flow and the conjestion of the car wash off of the street and to eliminate any off street parking. Again, care has been taken to create a visually attractive building as you can see by the rendering. But maintenance, upkeep and repairs are as important as an attractive building, it is gen- erally accepted that the ainount of business received s directly re- lated to the time and money the owner is willing to invest. The car wash must be managed and maintained in a condition suit- able for this area an," the city in general. And in regards to vandalism I have found that 90 percent of all vandalism in this type of business stems from equipment failure. If the customer puts in his or her money and it does not work properly, they have a tendency to take it out on the building. SO, it is impor- tant to have an on-sight attendant to help, manage and protect our investment. Therefore, the above facts and statements and my belief in the • car wash industry are strong justifications for the approval of this requested Conditional t:Ge Permit. /S1 rely, Lm CLI�_ PPesident of Coin-op, west 0 0 �cwEGT F.a�•.r ---� : a 4 .:.,gym V NORTI I RANCHO Ci:CANK) \G1 TITLE, l PLANNING DIVISION LU m;IT: SCALE Nivi" Wr CAR LUASO 1p Nolu'l ary (v RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITS MAN DIVISION 17xl 111111,; SCALE: I • Fo07H I WL V .rr F M WFI I Cin, ()I, irrM: R:1\CISO CUCAMONG A nT1.e: AN) SCRfff Gtf; PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT e4i A � 41— ul Nolen I 0 • CITY ON ITEM: rSJP 34'D RANCHO CUC,'" 1()\GA TITLE: 7f; &TA PLANNNG DIVISION EXIMIM-1—:)SCALE: �� • • fil Q L W, I; 1•\ r i ♦B(fr Mi F° a .i w �o Fr V � e N' • .G 0 5 GS•V4 I1� ° -9` G>•T tiro. 1�1iCbt.IV :R TJ PARKING LOT I Cat N'ORTI I cin, Or rn;,l Cep a4 -o i R:1NCI-IO CUC -1,NK GA rIT1.e: A �/ PG+4N PLANNING DIVISION r�l nllrr• �(sc,�l.[ Is CITY OF RAING 10 cuc i TITLE; . I - PLANNING DIN'JSIO I:NllilllT:iE,--Z- Scm,u NORTi I • 0 if Is CITY OF RAING 10 cuc i TITLE; . I - PLANNING DIN'JSIO I:NllilllT:iE,--Z- Scm,u NORTi I • 0 WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION ;1 li it I ,i a t I W i l ?rrculC-0 s (y A PPY MOO • u V \ORTI I • Cllnr or Jn I'M �4 _ RAND -10 CUCAMONGA rrrl,h: , oved C e ie PAP PLANNING DIVISION ICIIIRIT: —f —SCALD F:i TRILL WWLWORTWIS ferri � pAoif,4—T u -' P 4 -r-) CITY OF lt:1 -NCFIO CUCZ1NIONGYA1 PLANNING DIVISION M ATI I txlb L:7— WWLWORTWIS ferri � pAoif,4—T u -' P 4 -r-) CITY OF lt:1 -NCFIO CUCZ1NIONGYA1 PLANNING DIVISION M ATI I L:7— WWLWORTWIS ferri � pAoif,4—T u -' P 4 -r-) CITY OF lt:1 -NCFIO CUCZ1NIONGYA1 PLANNING DIVISION M ATI I • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: F= :" i Hr L� GC111- -C APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: C OLN . ;'r /'/N NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: GH'Z,- 1. r"'' '.J, 1p.- — !..,. rr ^ -. -,c 5rp'. / /ih �%. /!C'N/!•M �j J.V +o rJ G. \.'r �]AG i:'T LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 • PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: .\''�� -T DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? • 1-2 r - • WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO Y 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X' 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? .( 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _L 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? V 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? • Explanation of any YES answers above: <, r IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 25 ^' 4 Signature Title ` 1-3 i RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION . The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: • 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model R and k of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range I -4 _i . • RESOLUTIGN NO. 34 -31 • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CTMVIONGA PLAIv4l'IG C0;4- 1ISS1M`I DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PER'•1IT N0. 34 -01 FOR A COIN -OP CAR 'WASH LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNIER OF FOOTHILL AND HELMS I`I THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 27th day of February, 1984, a complete application was filed by Chris West for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of April, 1934, the Rancho Cucanonea Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above -destr ibed project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonaa Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the Following findings cannot be net: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. Tliat the proposed use, together with the conditions • applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injdrious to properties or inprovements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with eacn of the applicable provisions of the Development Copa. SECTION! 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -01 is denied, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF APRIL, 1984 PLANK G MMISMN Or THE CITY O�F1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 1.. Dennis L. hope, „nairn Sn �I ATTEST: RicW Gomez, 7e picy Sec r Cary 11 Resolution .'lo. • Page 1, Rick Gomez, Oeouty Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passedd, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of April, 198a, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMIISSIONERS: RE "PEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, STOUT NOES: cv"Ir SSIOIIERS: McNIEL A3SE:IT: CO }1MISSIONERS: NONE • • Associate_ ?'canner, Curt Johnston, reviewed the start reports. Cha;,r-an . cut opened the public hearing. Mr. Gera 14 Tust, of the engineering firm of �McCutchan Cor_oany, - rnc., representing the applicant, indicated that they accept the conditions as proposed. ' Cocsiosiorer ?!cNiel stated that at Des;g iew there had been discussion of a to: lot and asked what its disposition was. Mr. Johnston replied the Des i3n�iew Committee felt that a tot lot would be inappropriate i.a this particular develooment and asked that a picnic area be added instead. j Motion: Moved by/McNiel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution :1o.i84 -29 approving Development Districts Amendment No. 94-01 and issuing a Negative Declaration. Motion;," Moved by Mc Niel, seconded by Hempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -30, approving Tentative Tract No. 12521 and issuing a Neaa Live Declaration. 4 • / * I. EW111O lMENT.AL ASSESSME):T AND CONDITIONAL USE PE. MIT 94 -01 - 4,7ST - The development of a coin operated car wash on .45 acres of land in the General Commercial district located on the southeast corner of Foothill and Helms - APN 208 - 251 -54. Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report and stated that a letter was received from the 'Woolworth Garden Center opposing this conditional use permit. Chairman Stout asked with respect to the new Development Cade, what the minimum size of parcels are as compared to the size of this project. Mr. Coleman replied that it is 40,000 sq. ft. with the exception of when it is a part of a shopping ,center. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Chris Nest, 519 18th Street, Huntington Beach, the applicant, stated that he has the same desires that were expressed by the Desirn Review Committee to build only a positive facility for the city and is building only state- of -the- art car washes. Mr. :Jest stated that 90 perccnr, of .;ta -rlo comments are easily fitted and that they have ;one through ext•xnsrve landscsoin; and will install wrouant iron and have worked on the • :onalex desi;n ind jr^hiteeture. Further, that he felt the problem Edith iJnolworSh could be ;o Coed rhrou h a screen wall of additional landscaping. Planning, Commission Minutes 7 ,April 11, 1934 C airr._n Stout asked Mr. :lest if he has ever built a car dash on a one -: =_1f acre piece of property like this before. Mr. 'best rep Led that the smallest car wash has been 13,000 square .feet and they have redesigned the storage room to provide more space. Further, that they antictoate washing between 3,000 and 3,500 cars Per -oath and over that period of time traffic usually works itself out. Mr. Brian Harden, manager of the Woolworth Garden Center, read the letter he had provided to -he Planning Commission. Mr. Forrest Perry, 9180 orange Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that there is a 3ecu cty eronla_ there and a safety problem with the traff_c light ana .felt that the car crash should not be allowed. Mr. West stated that when he originally got involved in this Particular site it was his understanding that the propety was zoned for this type of operation. In the meantime, however, he stated, the Development Code was adopted and the uses changed. He indicated that when Woolworth got into the center it was zoned for his type of use and a two story office /commercial building was proposed which would have parking problems. Mr. West stated that with regard to the street light, cars have had the ability to get in and out of the shopping center and he does not see how it would create any more problem than a left turn lane. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. . Commissioner 9empei stated that he would have a problem with approving this kind of use on Foothill Boulevard. He expressed concern over the height of the car wash and t e area which would be used on the west side of the car wash where they would be datailin3 their cars with the rags and papers that might be left in open view. Commissioner Barker stated that this is a very nice building in the wrong location. Commissioner Mc2 el stated that when this came to the Design Review Committee, the Committse struggled with it because of its location. He indicated that Mr. West has gone along way in trying to achieve what is desired for Foothill Boulevard. Further, the Commission must provide the type of services that are needed in a City the size of Rancho Cucamonga in order for it to function. Commissioner McNiel felt that this project could be made to work. Commissioner 9emcel stated t:;at there had been ❑ lot of discussion on the type of businesses that would be oompatible on Foothill Sou /evard and what had been piannes: for that area. He felt that a car wash is not what is wanted on Foothill Boulevard Ind 'ne hoped that Mr. Perry will do something to enhance his store. t I Planning Commission Minutes 8 April 11, 1984 0 Commia5ioner VJarez le -t the nesi;a of :he car wsh is nice but she did not wart to +' located no Foothill Boulevard. Chairman Stcut stated that ?' ^• 77est has done a lot to have the car wash fit on that corner but Foothill is a Special 3oulevard and eventually the City wants to make that street more at'ra^_tive. Chairman Stout stated that ' -a basic problem is that piece is too small for what 43 proposed and they are trying to mitigate it through design and landacsping. Chair -an Stout did not feel i- fit on that corner. Motion: Moved by RemPel, seconded by Barker, carried, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -31, denying Conditiona: Use Permit 84 -01 - Nest. Commissioner :1ci14al dissented for his stated reasons. 8:15 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:70 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. # 11 f # A 8:30 P.m. Commissioner Juarez left the meeting due to a family emergency. i • s s f J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND '.ENT.AT'VE TRACT 1253? - ARC;'. :BALD ISSOCIATE3 - The develop -enc oC 111 zero lot line homes on 14.5 acres in the Low - Medium Residential District, located between Archibald and Ramona at Monte Vista Street.- APN 202 - 181 -05, 06, 15, 16. Chairman Stout stated that the Development District Amendment had not been advertised and this item would be continued, but that testimony would be taken tonight if there were comments. Associate Planner, Dan Coleman, r =Viewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. , Mr. Randy Poag, 801 Park Center Drive, Santa Ana, reviewed the project relating to the recreation area as well as the lot sizes. He also explained all changes that were made in order to incorporate the'5 additional acres into their deve'_opmert and CF It they now have a plan which would satisfy the existing nomeowners and no-n ly with the City's standards as well, Mr. Poag stated hzz concern with .... sr,a C° report rega Min; setbacks. Mr. Ar3m 3a8senian. pro.'e ^_t irehit ^ct, addrassed the concerns expressed in the staff report and described the 3rcn1tacture and patio homes concept. Planning Commission Minutes 9 April 11, 1984 L1 • r1 U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: May 16, 1984 To: City Council From: Finance Director Subject: Revenue Sharing - EPA 15, 1984 -85 � G�GMQy� si T r- r 19': 1 This will be the last time Council will be asked to consider Revenue Sharing just prior to the adoption of the City Budget. Inasmuch as the Federal Fiscal Year is somewhat different than ours, their approval of Revenue Sharing periods overlaps our Budget year. Therefore, in late summer or early fall we will once again be considering Revenue Sharing for Entitlement Period 16 (EPA -16), so as to be consistent with the Federal Budget. A new requirement has been added to recipents of Revenue Sharing and that is Section 504 of the Rules and Regulations governing revenue sharing. This has to do with the handicapped and their accessibility to public agencies. This includes not only those that are wheel chair bound,but also the hearing impaired, and others. Further details will be forth coming once the complete set of Regulations has been received by the City. As in the past, the recommendation is to appropriate Revenue Sharing, in 1984 -85 its $292,965, for the support of the Sheriff's contract with the City. Revenue Sharing has become an integral source of revenue in helping to off set cost of Public Safety operations over the years. Again, it is recommended that Revenue Sharing, EPA 16, be appropriated to support Law Enforcement for the period 10/1/83 thru 9/30/84. AGHELNF -NT THIS AGRE=, made and entered into this 8 day of December, 1983, by and between the CITY OF RANCID CUGAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a Municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and RC LAND COMPANY, a California general partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Developer ", provides as follows: RECITALS WHEREAS, Developer desired to cowlete the improvements required for the subdivision of certain real property in the City sham on conditionally approved Tentative Tract Map No. 11934; WHEREAS, one of the conditions of approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 11934 is that adequate flood protection facilities be provided; WHEREAS, the Corps of Engineers and the Federal Emergency Manage- • m of Agency has detennined that said adequate flood protection requires the acquisition and construction of a training levee to provide protection from a possible outbreak of the east levee of the Day Creek Spreafiing Grounds and to ranove Tentative Tract No. 11934 from the Flood Plain Zone. WHEREAS, the training levee is required north of Highland Avenue, in the unincorporated area, but is necessary for the safety and protection of area within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, City is willing to acquire the right -of -way for the train- ing levee across the property described in Exhibit "A" and "E'', at the present time, only if Developer agrees to pay all costs of acquiring said right -of -way; NOW, THEREFORE, City and Developer agree as follows: (1) Developer shall use its best efforts to acquire, by appropriate O means, an easanent for construction and maintenance of the training levee across the property described in Exhibit "A" and 'B" attached hereto. (2) If Developer is unable to acquire easement after using its best efforts, City shall use its best efforts to acquire by appropriate Proceedings, including eminent domain proceedings if necessary, said • easement. (3) Developer may utilize said easement, when acquired for the construction of a training levee, in order to satisfy the flood protection conditions of Tentative Tract Na. 11934. The location, design and constzuc- ' tion of said training levee within said easement shall conform to all City and appropriate governmental agencies' requirements therefor. (4) All costs of acquiring the aforesaid easement shall be borne by the Developer. Said costs shall include, but shall not be limited to, just compensation for the property acquired including severance damages, if any, litigation expenses and damages upon dismissal or defeat of right to take, appraisals, acquisition agent expenses, legal fees, and court costs. Any settlement which exceeds 1155 of the appraised value shall be approved by the Developer. • (5) Immediately upon the execution of this Agreement, Developer shall make a payment on account to the City in the sum of $3,000.00. This sun, and any other deposit with the City, may be used for any purpose con- templated by this Agreement. (6) Prior to the filing of a cacplaint in eminent domain for the purpose of acquiring the easement herein described, Developer shall deposit with the City the probable amount of compensation, based on an appraisal, that will be awarded in the proceeding, together with an additional sum equal to 15% of the probable amount of compensation. Said amount, and additions thereto while in the control of the City, will be kept in an interest bearing account. (7) In the event additional cronies are necessary in order to complete the acquisition contemplated by this Agreement, Developer shall deposit the • same with the City within fifteen (15) days after demand is made therefor. -2- (7) (cunt.) Without in any way limiting the foregoing, within fifteen (15) days • after entry of judgment, or other order, in any eminent domain proceeding, Developer shall deposit with the City an amount of money sufficient to enable the City to make said payment. (8) Subsequent to the conclusion of all proceedings contemplated by this Agreement, City shall return any unused portion of Developer's deposits including interest thereon to Developer. (9) This Agreement shall be binding and shall inure to the benefit of successors and assigns of the parties hereto. (10) Time is of the essence of this Agreement. (11) This Agreement nay be modified or amended only by an instru- ment in writing executed by both parties. (12) In the event either party is required to commence legal action • to secure performance by the other party of any of the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to recover court costs and reasonable attorneys fees. IN WITNESS WHMEOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. RC LAND COMPANY a California General Partnership BY: THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY as General Partner/ i /- Senior eePresident � i e President m ,E ,ESC 7 1983 _ .. CITY OF RANCHO C(1CAMONGA RM BY: • Mayor -3- M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager; and Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer FROM: Robert E. Dougherty,- City Attorney DATE: December 21, 1963 RE: Training Levee for Protection of Tracts 11934, 12044, 12045 and 12046. Enclosed please find quadruplicate originals of a proposed Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and the RC Land Company relative to the condemnation of property for the purpose of constructing a training levee to provide protection from a possible outbreak of the east levee of the Day Creek Spreading Grounds and to remove Tentative Tract No. 11934 from the Flood Plain • 'Lone. Also enclosed is RC Land Company's check in the sum of $3,000.00, which check is issued pursuant to paragraph 5 of the Agreement. The Agreement should be presented to the City Council for approval and execution and thereafter a fully signed copy of the Agreement should be returned to The William Lyon Company. Also, please provide me with a photocopy of a signed original for my file. once the City Council approves the Agreement, then the first step is to obtain appraisals of the parcels which the City seeks to acquire. Since the time we last commenced an eminent domain action, there has been a chanage in State law effecting the proce- dures which we must follow. Government Code §7267.2 now requires that "Prior to adopting a Resolution of Necessity . . . and ini- -1- tiating negotiations for the acquisition of real property, the public entity shall establish an amount which it believes to be • just compensation therefor, and shall make an offer to the owner or owners of record to acquire the property for the full amount so established. . . . in no event shall such amount be less than the public entity's approved appraisal of the fair market value of the property . Once the City Council approves the Agreement I will contact Difilippo 6 Company, Real Estate Appraisers, and I will ask them to perform the required appraisals assuming that their schedule will permit them to do so promptly. You may recall that Difilippo 6 Company performed appraisals for the City in connection with Assessment District 82 -1. However, if Difilippo 6 Company cannot perform appraisals promptly, I will shop around in an effort to locate a competent appraiser who can. • In the meantime, Lloyd, please check the latest equalized county assessment roll and provide me with the name and address of each owner of record of the subject parcels. RED:sjo Enclosures cc: Mr. Richard S. Robinson, Vice President /Treasurer The William Lyon Company F- 6,1 -2- • ;iiv��ILLL \�l LlC) \r/ /i.� /i7g7i/ fe19 CCP =�2n7E PLAZA, P C 90% 7526. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 94560 • (71-'! 333 -36CC Deco ber 12, 1983 133';\^ "s. Rober- E. Dougherty Attomev at law for the Citv of Banclo Cucannnga 1131 West Sixth Street Suite 300 Dntario, G1 91762 RE: Trnin.inq Levee fcr Protection of Tracts 11934. 12344, 12045 and 12046 Dear }r. Dougherty: Attaches are three fully executed copies of the Agreer,.ent regarding thee Trainin', Levee. Also attached is a check in the =,omt of 53,000.00 • payable'to the City of Rancho Cucamnr._a. We iould appreciate it if you orould proceed with the cmdennation as expeditiously as possible as the will be, lookine to deliver homes which will need to be protected by this facility m' ;larch of 1984. If you have any questions or if there is anything we can do to help with the process, please let us know. Sincerely, Ta WIIZLiN LYO1Z COMPANY ichard S. Ro inson vice President /Treasurer Attachments RSR /jj cc: }r. L1c ^d B. Hubbs :Ir. Ca ;(echling P.S. Af -er sU� ture. please renv-n one fully executed copy of the Agroenent. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT TO: MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL FROM: JEFF KING RE: PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS A. PROPOSED METHOD OF SELECTION: (1) Deal with all three vacancies simultaneously. (2) Each member of City Council, following interviews, Mal/ nominate/ one person they feel should be on the Commission. (3) The two incumbents are automatically included within the finalists, thereby making a total of seven contenders. (4) Starting from R to L or L to R, each councilmember votes for three. (a) Any finalist receiving three votes has thereby won a majority and is on the Planning Commission. (5) The process continues in reverse order, until a total of three finalists receive a majority vote of the Council. (a) ie; if after the first round of voting ora of the finalists receives a majortiy, then on the next round each councilmember has two votes. A drawback of this idea may be that towards the end it becomes difficult to achieve a majority. Overall however, I feel it to be reasonable and fair. CONVERSION OF OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES TO UNDERGROUND INFORMATION MANUAL OF PROCEDURES FOR PROPERTY OWNERS PREPARED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY, 1984 PROJECT DESIGNATION Underground utility District No. 2 (Archibald Avenue - Church Street to Base Line Road) CITY AND UTILITY CONTACTS FOR SPECIFIC QUESTIONS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Richard Cota Assistant Civil Engineer (714) 989 -1851 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Burt Steele Customer Service Planner (714) 947 -8272 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY Chuck Smith O.S.P. Engineering Supervisor (714) 986 -3318 Dear Property Owner: The area adjacent to your property is being considered as an "Underground Utility District" by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If approved the Council will adopt a Resolu- tion establishing the "Underground District" requiring all existing and future overhead utility lines within the area boundary to be placed underground. This booklet describes the sequence of events, procedures, and requirements of the property owners and the utilities to accomplish this conversion project. The property owners' responsibilities are summarized on Pages 9, 10, and 11. Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION n 1967, the California Public Utilities 'omission (CPUC) issued its Decision No. 13078, which requires private electric and :omunication utilities in the State of _ alifornia to set aside a certain amount of _oney each year for the conversion of -xisting overhead distribution lines to an underground location. The purpose of these funds would be to remove congested overhead poles and wires in areas used extensively by the general public such as large civic or recreational areas, and areas of unusual scenic interest, and to replace them with underground facilities. CPUC Decision No. 73078 was issued by the CPUC following many months of public hearings where all interested parties such as Cities, Counties, developers, utilities, and individuals expressed their view on the conversion proposal. Page 2 UNDERGROUND PROGRAM Statewide program to convert overhead lines to underground on a selective basis. Electric and Communication Utilities allocate money each year to selected conversion programs. ° ati o• � °�Teoa %. na�wa i!o °e .lo o• , "v �o o; aa00" 0°n °O °.>c °°... °o .ono . 4 OVERHEAD i? TO UNDERGROUND �1 V/L P L >ooe•oe'nl••h• J ,Pe •••'�_�'� 8 �p e•,o°e;on :•.••tea _•s_ _.__ v. _ o Page 3 SUMMARY OF RULING Overhead to underground conversion is done at the Utilities' expense except for the conversion of service facilities on private property. (See Page 9 for conversion on private property.) For an area to qualify, underground must be in the general public interest for one or more of the following reasons: 1. To eliminate an unusually heavy concentration of overhead electric and communication distribution facilities. 2, where streets or roadways are extensively used by the general public and carry a high volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. 3. Where a civic or recreational area is of unusual scenic interest to the general public. Additional details of the CPUC Decision are listed on Pages 5 and 6. Page 4 KEY PARTS OF CPUC DECISION NO. 73078 The Decision applies to all private electric and communication utilities. The key parts of the ruling state the following: "The utility will, at its expense, replace its existing overhead distri- bution facilities with underground distribution facilities along public streets and roads, and on public lands and private property across which rights - of -way satisfactory to the utility have been obtained, or may be obtained without cost or condemnation, by the utility, provided that: 1. The governing body of the City or County in which such distribution facilities are and will be located has a. Determined, after consultation with the utility and after holding public hearings on the subject, that such undergrounding is in the general public interest for one or more of the following reasons: (1) Such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy concentra- tion of overhead distribu- tion facilities; (2) Said street or road or right-of-way is extensively used by the general public and carries a heavy volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic; Page 5 Continued KEY PARTS (Cont.) (3) Said street or road or right -of -way adjoins or passes through a civic area or public recreation area or an area of unusual scenic interest to the general public. b. Adopted an ordinance creating an underground district in the area in which both the existing and new facilities are and will be located requiring, among other things: (1) That all existing overhead communication and electric distribution facilities in such district shall be removed. (2) That each property owner served from such electric overhead distribution facilities shall provide, in accordance with the utility's rules for under- ground service, all electrical facility changes on his premises necessary to receive service from the underground facilities of the utility as soon as it is available. (3) Authorizing the utility to discontinue its overhead service." Page 6 PROCEDURE FOR PROJECT DESIGNATION Each year the utilities allocate certain amounts of money to each community based upon the number of customers*in each City or County being served by the utility. These allocated funds accumulate from year to year. The City or County and utility representatives are responsible for reviewing and recommending the areas or projects which qualify for the conversion. After public hearings with the property owners in a proposed area, the City or County then designates the area as an "Underground Utility District" with clearly identified project boundaries. The utilities will then proceed to construct new underground facilities; and when all private property owners have provided new underground service connections, the over- head facilities are removed. Except for the property owners' costs of providing underground service connections, the conversion of the overhead facilities to underground is paid by the utilities. This procedure is diagramed on Page 8 * Overhead Page 7 AREAS OR PROJECTS CONSIDERED FOR CONVERSION )UALIFIED .ELECTED PUBLIC BEARING IF PROJECT IS FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL PUBLIC INTE•,REST, UNDER - GROUNDING RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED BY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY UTILITIES AND PROPERTY OWNERS COMPLETE UNDERGROUNDING WITHIN DESIGNATED TI14E PERIOD (USUALLY ONE YEAR FROM TIME RESOLUTION IS PASSED). Page 8 PROPERTY OWNERS' RESPONSIBILITY Underground conversion of existing lines is generally considered as an advantage to areas which wish to upgrade themselves from an aesthetic standpoint. Property owners are required to pay for the conversion of their overhead service to new underground service. This involves digging a trench from their property line to the electric meter, telephone, and TV service locations on the building. It is also necessary to modify the electric service meter panel to accept the new underground service. These items of trenching, backfill, metering modifications, etc., are generally done by local electrical contractors. The owners' costs usually range between $ 500 and$1,000. Some cases could exceed this depending upon trenching distance, trench conditions, and meter modifications. It is desirable that property owners obtain two or three "bids" from qualified contractors in order to compare costs. It is recommended that the property owners contact their local Edison Company and telephone company offices for assistance in determining required trench depths, trench location, backfill, duct requirements (if any), methods of modifying electric meter panel, and cable charges (if any). The telephone cable from the property line to the building is provided at no cost to the property owner. The underground electric service cables are provided by the utility continued... Page 9 at no cost to the property owner if the total length from the property line to the meter is 100 feet or less. If the total length is more than 100 feet, there is a nominal "excess footage" charge. When the utilities have completed their portion of the new underground facilities, the property owners will be notified so they can proceed with the installation and connection of the services. Should you have any questions regarding your new underground service, please con- tact the utility representative listed below. The diagrams on Page 11 illustrate the property owners' responsibilities. Page 10 v/h e .ems. OVERHEAD 4 v/L UNDERGROUND STREET Y P/' cups c% NOTE: 'Property owners are required to pay for trenchi.nq and backfill (short dashed line) from property line to electric, telephone, and Cable TV service locations. it is also necessary to pay for electric meter modification. Page 11