HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/08/01 - Agenda Packet - (Adden.)r 1
L A
\_J
�.� QTY OF
RANKM CLUAM0 UA
Y c CITY COUNCIL
o
F 2 !]L.El V l.lr1
U >
1977
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Addenda. to Amaust 1, 1984 Agenda
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The
deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the
meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items.
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag.
B. Roll Call: Wright _, Buquet , Mikels _
Dahl and Ring
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one time without discussion.
P. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council approving 1
issuance of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds.
•
L
Addendum to City Council Agenda -2- August 1, 1984
RESOLUTION N0. 84 -217 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS 1984
SERIES A IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF
$21,375,000
Q. Approval of application for new Residential Revenue 5
Mortgage Bond Program.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -218 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING APPLICATION
FOR ALLOCATION OF MORTGAGE SUBSIDY BONDS AND
FILING OF NOTICE OF SALE THEREOF WITH
MORTGAGE BOND ALLOCATION COMMITTEE,
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PROGRAM DEPOSIT
AGREEMENTS AND PROVIDING OTHER MATTERS
PROPERLY RELATING THERETO
4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. NON- ADVERTISED HEARINGS
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
E. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN AR -1355 9
REVENUE MORTGAGE BOND PROGRAM FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ORDINANCE NO. 229 (second reeding) 10
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
A HOME MORTGAGE FINANCING PROGRAM FOR
MODERATE AND LOW- INCOME FAMILIES FOR THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
0 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS
8. ADJOURNMENT
n
U
0
CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 1, 1984
C�GMOtiC
L 9
e }
,h
1977
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: CONCURRENCE WITH SB -99 REVENUE MORTGAGE BOND PROGRAM
The attached resolution approves the Redevelopment Agency's issuance
of 1984 Series A Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds under SB -99.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of a resolution by the City Council.
Reslkectful]Y ubmitted,
Community Development Director
JL:jk
Attach.
2271H
• RESOLUTION NO.
JHHW:ACH:ea 07/27/84
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSIGNING ALLOCATION OF QUALIFIED BONDS TO
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE AGENCY OF ITS
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, 1984 SERIES A,
IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $21,375,000
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San
Bernardino County, California, as follows:
WHEREAS, by the enactment of Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 33750) of
Part 1 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, the
legislature of the State has authorized redevelopment agencies to issue revenue
bonds for the purpose of financing residential construction within redevelopment
project areas;
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency ") has
determined to implement a residential construction financing program to provide for
the issuance of Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds of the Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency, the proceeds of which are to be used to carry out such
program;
• WHEREAS, to that end, the Agency did by Resolution No. , adopted
1984, authorize the issuance of $21,375,000 principal amount of
Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1984 Series A; and
s
WHEREAS, the City of, Rancho Cucamonga (the "City ") pursuant to the
provisions of the Costa -Marks Bond Allocation Act of 1981 (the "Act "), Chapter 3.5
(commencing with Section 50171) of Part 1 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety
Code of the State of California, did file with the Mortgage Bond Allocation
Committee of the State of California a notice specifying among other things, the
amount of qualified mortgage revenue bonds proposed to be issued by the City;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee by its Resolution No.
assigned an allocation to the City to issue qualified mortgage bonds in an
amount not to exceed $
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has undertaken and is
carrying out a redevelopment program in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance
with the provisions of the California Community Redevelopment Law;
WHEREAS, the City now desires to assign $21,375,000 of its allocation to the
Agency; in accordance with the further provisions of the Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 33640 of the Health and Safety Code requires the Agency to
obtain the approval of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, prior to
issuance of the Bonds authorized pursuant to the foregoing described Indenture;
pol
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga that .
1. $21,375,Oj00 of the City's allocation to issue mortgage revenue bonds
heretofore granted to the City by the Mortgage Bond Allocation
Committee is hereby assigned to the Agency.
2. The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency is hereby given approval to
issue said Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1984 Series A, in a
principal amount of $21,375,000.
R R R R R R R
2
3
1I I1
I
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a
. resolution duly passed and adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga on the 1st day of August, 1984, by the following vote:
ATTEST:
r
AYES, and in favor thereof, Council Members:
NOES, Council Members:
ABSENT, Council Members:
ty
41
0
•
Ell
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 1, 1984
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL REVENUE MORTGAGE
BOND PROGRAM
Attached is a resolution authorizing the application for the next
round of residential mortgage bonds. The application will be for-
warded to the State Allocation Board. The sooner our application
is submitted after completion of the current program, the sooner
Rancho Cucamonga will be placed :n the allocation list.
That the City Council consider approval of the resolution for
application of a new residential revenue mortgage bond program.
JACK LAM, AIMF'
Community Development
Attach.
e
5
�. cn,NON
1977
2280H JHHW:ACH:ea 07/28/84
RESOLUTION NO. jV-.a /:
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR
ALLOCATION OF MORTGAGE SUBSIDY BONDS AND
FILING OF NOTICE OF SALE THEREOF WITH MORTGAGE BOND
ALLOCATION COMMITTEE, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
PROGRAM DEPOSIT AGREEMENTS AND PROVIDING OTHER MATTERS
PROPERLY RELATING THERETO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
as follows:
WHEREAS, both the City and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency have
undertaken programs and have issued qualified mortgage revenue bonds to finance the
purchase of mortgages made to finance single- family owner- occupied homes
constructed within the City and the Agency, respectively, and and the City and the
Agency may each desire to issue additional qualified mortgage revenue bonds (the
"Bonds ") to finance the purchase of additional mortgages;
WHEREAS, to obtain an allocation to issue the Bonds within the federally
imposed limit upon the issuance of mortgage subsidy bonds, the City, for itself and
• on behalf of the Agency, must file, pursuant to the Costa -Marks Housing Bond
Allocation Act of 1981, as amended (the "Costa -Marks Act "), a notice of sale of the
desired principal amount of the Bonds proposed to be issued with the State Mortgage
Bond Allocation Committee, all or a portion of which allocation the City proposes
to assign to the Agency;
WHEREAS, in addition, in order for the City to obtain such an allocation,
the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee requires that the City cause evidence of the
deposit of an amount of money or, in lieu thereof, of a letter of credit, securing
such amount, which amount shall be subject to forfeiture and application by the
City to assist housing for persons of low and moderate income within the City upon
the failure to sell any or only a portion of the Bonds;
WHEREAS, developers within the within the City and the Agency desire to
provide the deposit required to be made in order to obtain such an allocation, such
deposit to be subject to the terms and conditions described in Program Deposit
Agreement between such developer and the Agency; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to use for purposes of deposits by the developers
the Program Deposit Agreement previously approved by the City's Resolution No. 83-
160, adopted September 7, 1983;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED and ORDERED, as follows:
1. Application to the State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee for an
allocation for the Bonds under the Costa -Marks Act is hereby authorized and
®
approved.
EN
2. A notice of sale of $ principal amount of such Bonds is
hereby caused to be filed by the City Clerk with the Mortgage Bond Allocation •
Committee.
3. The Program Deposit Agreement previously approved by the adoption of
the City's Resolution No. 83 -160, adopted September 7, 1983, is hereby approved for
use in connection with the collection of deposits from developers, as required by
the Costa -Marks Act;
4. At such time as the developers shall have complied with the deposit
requirements of the Program Deposit Agreement, the City Clerk shall cause to be
delivered to the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee a certified copy of this
resolution, together with a certificate executed by the City Manager and
substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, and hereby made a part
hereof, to the effect that the City has on deposit in an interest - bearing trust
account or, to the extent applicable, has secured by a letter of credit an amount
which equals 112 of 1% of the principal amount of the Bonds requested for
allocation.
Adopted this 1st day of August, 1984, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: •
CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA
ATTEST:
City Clerk
IRA
•
2070H
• CERTIFICATION REGARDING NOTICE TO THE
MORTGAGE BOND ALLOCATION COMMITTEE
JHHW:ACH:ea 07/05/84
The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby certifies to the Mortgage Bend
Allocation Committee pursuant to the requirements of Section 50191 of the Costa -
Marks Housing Bond Allocation Act of 1981 (the "Costa -Marks Act "), as follows:
1. The City did by Resolution adopted on August 1, 1984, order the filing
with the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee of a notice of sale and request for
grant to the City of an allocation of mortgage subsidy bonds in the amount of $
all or a portion of which the City wishes to assign to its
Redevelopment Agency.
2. The City has on deposit in an interest - bearing trust account or has
secured by appropriate letters of credit an amount equal to 112 of 1 percent of the
dollar amount set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, which deposit is subject to the
forfeiture provisions of the Costa-Marks Act.
3. The City requests the grant of an entitlement allocation of
$20,000,000.
4. The undersigned City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been
• duly authorized and directed to execute and deliver this Certification pursuant to
resolution of the City. A certified copy of the above mentioned resolution
accompanies this Certification. The City will provide in a timely manner any
further information required or requested by the Committee.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By
City Manager
Date: , 1984
•
Exhibit A
8
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CCCAbIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 1, 1984
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A HOME
MORTGAGE FINANCING PROGRAM UNDER AS -1355
��cn.a�oro
2 �
n
-
A
Z
Bond Counsel has revised his opinion regarding the second reading
for the AB -1355 enabling ordinance. Therefore, the action taken
at the adjourned city council meeting last week has the effect of
ordinance first reading and the City Council is asked to take second
reading of this ordinance. No changes are made in the original
program since the ordinance still became effective immediately
upon adoption (first reading) last week.
Respectfully.sukitted,
Community Development Director
JL:jk
- 9
19'"
�cJ
Gt,CAAi(M_
CrrY of
' RANCM CUCAMONCA
s CITY COUNM
o AiENL)k
'J >
1977
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
1. 1984 - 7:30 s.m.
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The
deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the
meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items.
• 1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag.
B. Roll Cell: Wright , Buquet ti , Mike1S 4
Dahl and Ring.
C. Approval of Minutes: June 6, 1984
June 18, 1984
June 20, 1984
June 28, 1984
July 5, 1984
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
Thursday, August 2, 1984, 7:00 P.M. - HISTORICAL
PRESERVATION COMMISSION, Lions Park Community Center.
Wednesday, August 8, 1984, 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING, Lions Park Community Center.
City Council Agenda -2- August 1, 1984
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar _items are expected to be
routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one time without discussion.
A. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 84 -08 -01 and I
Payroll ending 7/12/84 for the total amount of
$597,928.08.
B. Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AB 84 -18 for On -Sale 5
Beer 4 Wine Eating Place License, Linda J. Lane, 8890
Eighth Street.
C.
Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AB 84 -19 for On -Sale
7
Beer 6 Wine Eating Place License, Eduardo S Zoila
Manquera, 9730 19th Street,
D.
Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AB 84 -20 for On -Sale
9
Beer 6 Nine Eating Place License, Farzin Bina 6 Babman
Nasseri, 8998 Foothill Blvd, #102.
E.
Forward Claim (CL 84 -15) against the City by Betty Gean
11
Hall, auto accident on May 9, 1984, located at
Archibald Avenue and 4th Street.
F.
Forward Claim (CL 84 -16) against the City by Jon
14
Landberg, personal injuries on April 24, 1984, in the
Victoria Country Club (Parkway).
G.
Approval of Parcel Map 8597, located on the east side
17
of Vineyard Avenue, between Ninth Street and Arrow
Route, submitted by Lozier Corporation. Item continued
from July 18, 1984 meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 84-201 21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP 8597
H. Approval of Bonds and Agreement for Parcel 1 of Parcel 22
Map No. 8179, located on the west side of Cottage
Avenue, south of 8th Street, submitted by Edward L.
Mayhew.
•
City Council Agenda -3- August 1, 1984
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -212 30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR PARCEL I OF PARCEL MAP 8179
I. Approval of Bonds and Agreement and Final Map of Tract 31
No. 12332 -1, located on the east side of Haven Avenue
at the north City Limits, submitted by Walter Laband.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -213 45
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12332 -1
J. Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien 46
Agreement, submitted by Randolph and Sandy Davis for
property located at 5751 Cabrosa Place.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -214 53
. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM RANDOLPH AND SANDY DAVIS AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN
THE SAME
K.
Approval of agreement with consulting engineer L.S.
54
Eisenhart for design of traffic signal for a fee of
$2,000.00.
L.
Approval of release of bonds for Tract 10491 for sales
57
office /garage conversion on Lot 1 and Subdivision Sign
located on Lot 1, Lightner Development.
M.
Approval of release of $500.00 cash deposit for a
58
Subdivision Sign located at 10111 Victoria Street for
Tract 9305, Jones Company,
N.
Approval of amendment to the existing professional
59
services contract to Include preparation of fiscal year
1983 -84 Guarantee Performance Reports as required by
HUD.
19
City Council Agenda -4- August 1, 1984
U
0. Set public hearing for August 15, 1984 for appeal of
Planning Commission decision approving conditions
placed on Tentative Parcel Map No. 8583, Lucas Land
Company.
4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ORDERING THE YORK IN CORNRCI'ION WITH ANNEXATION 50. 5 62
TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I FOR TRACT
NOS. 11934, 12044, 12045, 12046
RESOLUTION N0, 84 -215 71
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 5 TO
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR
TRACT NOS. 11934, 12644, 12045, 12046
5. NON- ADVERTISED HEARINGS
A. AN AMENDMENT TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CREDIT
AGAINST RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PARK DEDICATION
REQUIREMENTS - Item continued from July 18, 1984
meeting.
ORDINANCE NO. 105 -C (second reading) 73
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTIONS E AND F OF
SECTION 16.32.030 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO PARK AND
RECREATIONAL LAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
B. DISCUSSION OF AMBULANCE MATTERS PERTAINING TO
REGULATIONS OF AMBULANCE SXRVICE WITHIN THE CITY Of
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
12
•
•
.i l
City Council Agenda -5- August 1, 1984
ORDINANCE NO. 230 (first reading) 75
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION
OF AMBULANCES
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
A. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING ORDINANCE 148 - Amendment
85
would remove "sunset" provision from present "Mobile
Home Park Rent Mediation" Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. 148 -A (URGENCY)
86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 148 BY
REPEALING SECTION 2 THEREOF PERTAINING TO
TERMINATION OF CHAPTER 8.10 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "MOBILE
HOME PARK RENT MEDIATION", AND DECLARING THE
URGENCY THEREOF
B. AUTHORIZING BALLOT POSITIONS BE PREPARED FOR DIRECT
87
ELECTION OF MAYOR MEASURE - The City Council will
consider authorizing the, preparation of written ballot
arguments and direct City Attorney to prepare an
impartial analysis for City measure regarding the
direct election of Mayor.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -216
92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
CERTAIN OF ITS MEMBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN
ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE AND
DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
C. SIGN AMORTIZATION PROGRAM - A program for the Council's
93
consideration which provides for the orderly removal
and /or correction of signs which became nonconforming
due to adoption of the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance
(1979).
City Council Agenda -6- August 1, 1984
D. CITY ATTORNEY STATUS REPORT ON UNFUNDED STATE MANDATED 107
PROGRAMS
7. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. ADJUSTMENT Of MUNICIPAL ELEMON DATES - The City 110
Council will discuss the potential of modifying current
municipal election dates to coincide with other
statewide and /or other local elections.
8. ADJOURNMENT
C-1
_ N 6- 1-9 SI OF WARRANTS
•
PAYEE
____________ ______ _______
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ID A E 4 LIFE SERVICE
14 ACII,% TRAVEL AGENCY
404 4LL5EE iT2V'_N
22 AM PUBLIC HUNKS ASSOC
31C AAFOH TPUCK E ^CIE_S E ECLIP INC
4L1 AYENS• bPIAN
31 BANK ^F AME "nl:A NT r $A
4C6 THE BAm"AIAN LLPPAHY
41 BISHOP IOMPAYY
154 MICHAEL BRANCMAN ASSOC, 14C
292 BRUBAKEF, LAVIS C PERSCM
249 CHARLES BUNUET 11
It C G ENGINEERING
560 CUR PAPER CL -FANY
tB CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE
69 CHAFFEY VNIOP ME DIST
72 CHRISICPNER CHEV, MAPN
T4 CITY RENTAL
51 CLAREMOMI BLUEPRINT CLPPANY
327 CLARK bOARDPAN CO. LTC
36C CLAYTON, DANIEL
3B7 COCA -COLA BOTTLING COMPANY CF 14
399 COCHPAN, JOSEPHINE
130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO
3B3 COPY LINE CONP
02 H B COVEY, INC.
402 CRUZ, MARIA
260 CSULB FULARDATION
BB CUCAMONGA CO HATER DIST
B7 CUCAMONGA PRINTING
243 DAY- 11MERS, 114C
315 TED CE BONES
105 DERBISH GUERRA C ASSOC.
331 DUNN C COMPANY
236 ESBIL CLRPLRATION
397 ESSIG, BOBBIE
164 FIELCMAN, 93LAPP L ASSOCIATES
167 FOOTHILL LAANMUwER SERVICE
351 FORD OF UPLAND, INC
392 FOMLER, MAN
• RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 1
IIEP UES,R
_________ ______ ___
AAMRN AANR.API.
___________________
•
1345, -
13961
VEFICIE NAINLSNERIFEU
;3462
641.12
'.AI LEAGUE OF CillE. C
0114k ITEMS
IJEE3
40L.C6
KEFUNO NEC CLASS
1,"i
IO.LL
- EMNEFSHIP CUES
E 2465
5...00
VICE 6PACKo1
134tf
59.3t
NEFUND FEC CLASS
1;567
IA.LC
IRIVELIMEE1lNGS
IHER lltMi
134FE
32 &.21
FILINE FEE` FEW O.&4 -14
139t4
1.1.4.
FCd; F;UNEFt SAw
1394E
41 It
26 SIR 1111237t
13491
2.55C.CC
NEFuHG UN KLLUM,.IA110N
DePU517
13992
2,50L AC
USN ALVANCE
13993
15G.CO
PLAN CK SE.PVICES
13494
2,424.CL
AEWND oUi LTC 74,?
13545
35.4:
STREET SIGNS r
,INfN ITEMS
13996
L,4E<.tT
FAC1l1TY FINIAL
13991
3,00L..00
VEPICLE MAINTtUbll 18 E
OTHER ITEMS
13596
44b.5b
EQUIP BENTAI
13999
17.50
EEV P111 P.Av C
LTPER Ilkdb
14000
62.9'.
F OFNS E AGFFEMtNTS
14GCI
57.64
FEFUNL REC FEES
(ACV,
1-_.5.
RENT 'JUNE
14003
19.00
NEFUND FEC FEES
14004
54.00
AKRONIMMANGA E
U1HER IIEM$
L4CC5
2,216.21
MPKIHLY MEN14L CUPY M C
1IhEN ITEMS
14006
341.71 .
NtPAIK TO GAC PUMP
14CO7
60.66
REFUND GEC CLASS
14006
36.CU
6UCGEI SIRAIE61ES
1411[9
16L.CL
1RALT 934b -PKY E
..INER ITEMS
14010
466.31
2X3 NOTICE
14011
IAE.40
UFFICE SUPPLIES C
:FINE- IIEMX
14[12
35.9t
..PLSIT CLNST PEN 142[
14013
50L.CD
PLAN CA SEAVICkS
14014
31210.UG
CASTER •wMEEI
14D16
571.Ba
PUN CHECK
14016
2,22b.72
MEFUNG NEC FEES
14017
I..CO
1904 FES MO FG FiV Bs%;,
F.UGPAM
14GIE
461.54
L.wNPCwER REPAIR
14L19
14.58
VkH MAIN] 73622,
1402E
14.00
NEFUND REC FEES
14021
36.00
•
{
6-
1-64 LIST CF :ARRAATS
kAN,FO
CU,AFONDA
FAGF .
•
PAYEE
ITE• .ESCA
NAnRv
______-
i
______________________________________----___-____--__-____-___-_
_________---
_________
- -_
391
FREEMAN. CARMEN
REFLNO HE' FEES
14C22
31.OL
137
GENERAL IELEPHLki CC.
9a L-2A?4 C To-_A
ll' -PS
I4 ?.
2,: 9c. 73
143
GRANT, JENNY k.
Fk RFUNMh6CE kEUUK1TICN
14021
I CiL.0L
359
GRCSS, "Sly
nIkUNL REC FEc6
14025
13.x
366
GRUNAU, CINISA
kk FUNO RFC FEES
14(-2(
3E.D(
396
HERR, FALL
REFUND NEC FEES
ISC'a7
lb.CL
158
NOII IOAY RUCK Lu.. INC.
ASPHALT - bIHEk
llk4s
14(25
}91.69
372
J. M. COhCNEIE
CEP PERMIT )537
1h(2S
3CC.to
312
MAY C JACMSUN CJ
ki*UND CONST VEk.II Lb. DEPOSIT
1463,
5C(.CL
175
JOBS AVAILw6LE
EMPLOYCENI ACv
I4C) 1
:44.L1
398
MAYS, dERh ALINE
REFUND NEC FkaS
14[32
1`_.OD
365
KEITH. LORI
NEFUNU NkC .i c.
14C33
N.DU
265
KINMO'S GRAPh1L5
kFFICE oUFPLlki
14(35
lbb.82
352
KkALI. EkVIN
kikUNL NLC FEES
14[35
15.0::
714
4NU1E. JUAN A
MINLIES 7/11/64 = LTKER
37EMS
14036
` -C.DC
4OC
KUMAR, AJAY
RE F UNC Rill CLASS
14[37
IE.LC
193
LAIRD CONSINUC1106 CU
TRASH CLEAN UP 61N /6AKER
14C38
5,727.CC
339
LAM, JACK
PkRFLRMANCE RECLORI710N
14039
2,CCC.00
507
M C M NEFRIGERAIICN, KID, A/,
Al , LONG SERVIC[ C L1hER
ITEMS
24C4O
24.6b
313
MACCO CONoIRUC11UN
6EPC:SIT CUNSI PER 2143-3
14[41
1.GLL.C6
332
NAJOk IUCK SUPPLY. INC
LOCKS
I 4 42
65.53
183
BILL MARK C ASSCCILIES
EERYL /kELLMAN S%L M UhA /hS
I4C43
3,J1 S.5G
324
MARTIN JASMA INC
Dk POSIT CONST PER 1587
14444
166.OG
264
MC CUICHAN CO, INC
QVEkFNY OE PLAN F.ES
14C45
1,d T2.G6
1J
283
EFlk NC (LINE
REFUND RE, CLASS
I4G46
16.00
.52
JON MINELS
J Sh ACVANLE
14L41
154.00
aC9
MODERN ALL3YS. INC
ncPAlk,.LPLACE MBGR
I4CA�
S,3EL.CC
347
MUMTCLAlk AUTO 800Y
kEhiCLE nkPAIM/SMEki" S
14044
186.(.6
408
MOkIGhGE BOND ALLDCA7IDK CLMM
FEES ISS4 FkQLkkM
14050
300.60
231
NEMAK INC.
oAL DUE JULY NEAT
14[5)
1.513.15
232
OMRITRANS
8.1 PASSi5-JL'NE LS54
14[52
126.00
306
CR70k, LLOYD R
INSVRCl1Uh F2c3 7. i-7 /:a
IACSJ
1,ALL.CL
461
PACIFIC NLLK L GRAVEL C.
ASk(ALT - LIH(k
17EM1
14[54
12.4[
353
PEOR64A, RARTMA
n[FUNJ NEC FE.S
14[55
IS.00
27i
PITNEY >Gwki
MAIL SCALE C JTHER
ITEMS
14056
254.6,
255
PONA OISTRi6UTIKG CG
kDiL
I4C57
7,18(.61
242
PRECISION BUILT PULLS
LCC. PERMIT REFeK0
1405E
212.E8
605
PRINTING MChi
+DNE BLUE,k&04NLIhiS
14[59
457.'.1
497
QUILL CGhP
yf FlCE aUPPLIiS
44CLC
3&.C5
251
R C k AUICMLTIVE
VERICLE kEFATkJSHER:FFE
14[61
1'.2.36
307
R C LAND CL
LVkkPAY Ch BLOG PERMITS
14CL2
39.50
7*
0
E-
1 -64 LIST GF .AERANT3
FANLNe CULAMLNGA
F"t
•
PAYEE
ITEM _I:CR
1A.RA
MLR .1Y1.
2EI
RANCH. CDC' 6REAAF a51 LIONS
EENVI Cf :, U:a
1
6,.00
273
F'%C. .ISP ;AI
L
5:9: LA SLI% .
:1nFn
;1FM5 14c,1
111 . 7E
474
RANCk: !,CNAL CLINIC
Lu T72RI PHTSII.AEa
lit(:
S.CC
BARK -Ala. 11.:
ll
'.MP.ILN S[6v: CE
.s0
274
JA7Z Rf YNJLCS
-
YINLTE S`6 /:
IN.TE
CT t[R
I40t1
ITEMS 14061
1
55.60
Ili
NI1C CAMERA LENTEni
C
ES
PhOI3 SUPPLIES
UIhE.
ITEMS 1 4c6
611.34
2i6
RIVERSICf 6LNST9L,T
YNINI[A nAl[RIAL [
AHEM
]]EMS I4C64
151._.
343
R7VEF:IC[ ..Cn ST FI -7101 CL
FRLC PAY F;
1-4CTl
•C a, 24E.7J
.
221
FOGCR'. RS IIJ
USn ICV:N LE
1
[ ACT 1
150 .CC
%i4
90CI, LiSLI( C
ALAS CY .CRVIEE 719 -7120
14(.7.
a,CC(.LL
3(3
SAI.ISbURY, CLOY
.AFU -D ^-EC fEkS
14CT3
I3.5C
1CC
Cr. or SAN 2Ek6ARCI%C
3Pk'IAL IAa LLEC71LN
14074
1, 21E.C1
KC
SEARS, RCELUCK ANC CO.
COUNTER 1. ^.P
14C75
86.55
126
SEVCN CAT AU1C PART;
AUIL PARIS
L1FLH
21E�> 140t
55.64
i17
SGUINLAN CSLIPLRSIA EDISON CC.
6L57 LAkNLI IAN '
„IFEA
W-S ISC77
3.:EC.3C
d1
SUUIhERN CALIF-NIA ECI SUN CO.
=4 tASELINE7MARINE NE C
U FEN
ITir,S I4L7E
:76.66
217
SCUTMERN CALIFCRNll EDISON CC.
7324 CENTER irk I
INCH
1TEr.S 14079
I.C49.7t
.�
317
SOUIHEkN CLLIPDRNIA E:4 SON CU.
24 EASELI%E,VI.%LyA ;. L
_TNER
17Era 14(EC
69,313.9°
315
SCUTNERN CAL:F..NN:A GAS C..4PANY
6751 ANR;,.. F:.Y C
LINER
ITEMS IiOLI
121.62
322
SPARMLETTS
If&TELY NE%71L
146f,
53.50
SSMA
CU'-
Lice -
3, CC
.Ab
57ANCAND LFFICE SYi1L'15
LFflLi SUFFLILa
146c4
74.b5
344
STANTCE NURSERIES, INC
1kEES
14CE5
9CE.42
(N
253
MR. CLARK STA-A
;,EFUNC CUNLI PER 3573
14Cn6
I5C.CC
.3D
STATIONERS CUnFC NAIICN
_Fi1Ck aOFFLILi L
31NER
IIEr.S 14[87
3[2.36
4E
STEVE'a MLcIL
11NICLF _1' L
L7MER
:IEMS 146!0
197.1E
J72
SCIIIVA'.. a
I A:. CA
14084
:, 714.CC
.74
1M6 SJN
LMPLZT °b.T A E
CInER
ITEY.a I41SC
_C =.EL
-29
3RIS11 M LATE
FLNCHICLFa LIUN, FA-N
34091
35 .C2
246
THE PORILAC.O MILT[':.
:.AT LEAGUE IF CIIIkS
IT [;I
:I E 4 1409:
31E.80
iEl
DEPT '.F TRANSPGkTATl:.n
AF'R76.19= 4yIV.11vNT 3:.6
14093
2,429.33
.fc
TRAVi Ra, F.b LklA
.c /UNC n.L 11LS
]4CS5
3(.CC
256
UN;VEF]AL A. _L, INC
11LFCkC CIS TIC
:509:
S..CC
it9
LPLANC ALTO PA.JS
kE =LG: -LS LL-
:469t
E.(4
113
USA T,,CAY
aCc SCR :F'11..N
liC97
54.CC
84
VANCE CCNPL.RITICN
nLJ FAT
1 4C9
24.IC3.lc
453
"SSEFMAN, L.ALNEN
,E {E2ef A;. _E F_:CGNi 71UN
14095
2,CCC.CC
.67
WESTERN NLLM C
A_rr4 LI
:41C,
9.V
55E
.ES7EAN 1tr.FLNARY SERVICL
LxFC -AMY FLLF E
LTF_R
IIEu. :416:
TIL.It
366
:MHCAILl Y, -'Illy
..;f UIL ILL 5k ,S
:4:02
54.DL
365
D. 4ILLIAM. PRINTS%:,
_-- LARCS.R C.r E2
I43C3
7.95
0
ob
7
*-"¢F
•- 7 -i4 L:!7 C: wdF WATTS
GARLIC CLLAtCAC•
GA_C +
_
igEE
lt!' _S:G
_----------------------------------------------------------
'n AUGn
wA1•G .A:'1.
:-------------------------------------
357 AY"C -FI GL ?Lnl
,,!rLt.L GkC FEL!
IUCS
15.44
:C4 AEGC>t
nEYIALIShLnIF
L :InFF 11E'L :ill's
7'5PY.3C
aC YLNCF. C:i ^_ia ,: G'. I -=
1 Lan /JUNE - St LRIFFi
IUCt
TC.CC
TU AL LKCAS
VIs
0
ob
7
•
l.itA ,ye, /y.rc�
COPY.._.N.._...•..N.N.. -Z �/- TN.I1..::... _ar
AMICNIOM !OR AtCONnIK M11OA01 lNntlNll
I.: O•Iaal'�II N AI«A.li I...rT CwMN
Iw re�e CAIN."It, Son 3eznardi -O
...`•+•+^••....•�.••
Ia. IpI�a1«I X.rN/ •p1(. f.
Saarlw lw.al./ «IAw.,
I MEFSl Of I:CCNSfISI
NL
A -tale .:cer - ., Snc
.ULli. _reoires
AppSN .Nw SN. 2" ❑
M.....TM.::tT4=,e
aaaW15�—
cop( 3615
Ow
I,A w
2. 04AIAyS) a At11KANT15)
T.wp. r..,.
)A550
ElMiwple �f22iG
�.u.r..
]. TTN(S) OF TMNSACTIOEyS)
116plan a ^YES" on...r N ,., v nr Ill en on eM[.inwn .Xrtn Noll b. C «mN pwr N Mi. epyl..won.
lfG
TT.E
fA`:cr Ltnda r,
:er :Bf. 42
Ib) tb b .AI .er .01c'. w .ww ar i.rwl N M .i.lelN eny of me pe.X.T of M. Al<anell< I..wap. CAnlrel Act
1 "N "•-'0
47
I; _ 21
nw.r
aN.w.N F.iMw
,7ver2ay -ent
21.7^
x t «w.n N Iwmw -NwMr �M Swr
SIGN X(!! ... .. – ............................. . .. .. ....
...._.. .... ------------------------------------------------ .
AnlKAT10N MY TRANSFEROR
IS. STATE Or CAlVO11,1IA Cwary ......... .. N....__.7�T ^!.........•.
c�'r..nd Z'Cctl. [gory
it % "'�:.aII JCSO
fOTAI
1 It"
3390 ll rht �trpwt an.N��Cl.[awrrw�Tnl OTC ; ^. . f)l.arn..I..rR
0. Net WW. Bdow, f/w LM.; Fa Dw". , V. CW,
AnAd A (] S..&qd F�aMMIn.laa
p ANgC: 31L ....... .........................._... . CMS fMtl0 ..7(1 S /81
r_..
Qle- 0F. N_.___._...l M l. ............................. 04..n ........ ......... ArM Na ----------- ..._......
ra.«..M. w..
A II h.Iwwl lnweN. r. An h.aiwl Nrd.
Sb.n tIM el t¢ru 42- 14.:499 fry Lz Let
1. AIwIXi AJMW rr 61TF.nl I e 11–NMnb.r eN ihwl
0. Nen. yw .••. b.w fenrNlN N a NwnTl 10. Xa.. Iw ..w am N M. perlwwl N Ib. AkMNiI
C. Act
' I....p(. er r.a.l.ael`r N Ilw
M O..arinl.n....
n.! w M. Act?
Act
116plan a ^YES" on...r N ,., v nr Ill en on eM[.inwn .Xrtn Noll b. C «mN pwr N Mi. epyl..won.
•
11. AWk.nl Wrw. (.1 M. any weiwq.r .IaNwN .n An'wle I l.," p..wl .dl .w. al: M. aulfirwen. al a 4amm, aw
Ib) tb b .AI .er .01c'. w .ww ar i.rwl N M .i.lelN eny of me pe.X.T of M. Al<anell< I..wap. CAnlrel Act
13. STATE Of CAIIEO MA Cwnry al ___ LaII -!GrII9Td1 O___. _OWN .7 /.]A/AAa ..
r��'wy
nw.r
r xw.r . .. n .✓ +.... �X. ., .+. ...� n•r . n ...� ..n n..�.. ...w
b AMIUNT
SIGN X(!! ... .. – ............................. . .. .. ....
...._.. .... ------------------------------------------------ .
AnlKAT10N MY TRANSFEROR
IS. STATE Or CAlVO11,1IA Cwary ......... .. N....__.7�T ^!.........•.
.nl .
FI�
.Xn'...
.. ...an w ....... . ... ......i...r.n...., w ........ ...,..n n
3390 ll rht �trpwt an.N��Cl.[awrrw�Tnl OTC ; ^. . f)l.arn..I..rR
0. Net WW. Bdow, f/w LM.; Fa Dw". , V. CW,
AnAd A (] S..&qd F�aMMIn.laa
p ANgC: 31L ....... .........................._... . CMS fMtl0 ..7(1 S /81
r_..
Qle- 0F. N_.___._...l M l. ............................. 04..n ........ ......... ArM Na ----------- ..._......
ra.«..M. w..
1
�1
�I
�I
I
c
i z �
I I;
_L_��SrYZc�r_ _
L'.Tq of OuTA6C, ' C,ry or L)A7r2 0
JF_'S 'DCP07- ,S LoClFTED v/� tje �Ua2TtftdeS'1 Cp2Ne/�
V i ,? Q PnZD A-we- K -Aj 8 c` 57/1cCr
SuLjec.I ' YRoPI �oNED �t%busTQiAL SQL /FC �LAr()
At( 6UTADmUDIA16 Yi PIOL Y t S o
G etiekA -L '-PLflti ° T. s. p.
•
N
i z �
I I;
_L_��SrYZc�r_ _
L'.Tq of OuTA6C, ' C,ry or L)A7r2 0
JF_'S 'DCP07- ,S LoClFTED v/� tje �Ua2TtftdeS'1 Cp2Ne/�
V i ,? Q PnZD A-we- K -Aj 8 c` 57/1cCr
SuLjec.I ' YRoPI �oNED �t%busTQiAL SQL /FC �LAr()
At( 6UTADmUDIA16 Yi PIOL Y t S o
G etiekA -L '-PLflti ° T. s. p.
•
•
COPY MMI V
Iwr.w.Jf4x I.<Y xrlwN ��OM.Or
S)MICATMTN MR ALCONOEEL RINIRAOS MUMS)
Iw Dprlm.. N AlwhNk E.r.fE. C.x.l
1b3r wr... CiI.TNf# San e.rELArdin0
1. TTIII Of LICENSERS)
FILE NO
I
04 SAL-- 1 --i
ee..w pry,... Si`73i i
EECFMI NO.
GEOI
CODE 7619
1. NAMHRI W AFR1GWrIS1
" F ,
FA.<F -cAAF
4ANf;L'CAA. 3duArdo E :.ol1A 0.
a. TAEISI OF TEANSACTIONIS)
FEE
LK.
IM
200.00
EO
Annual Fee
196.50
.. I..w..
Enchi AilidA Aou RA CT 70
S. laM.n N Aww -N.n.w ww lw.w
9770 -19th Street
RaUh"Q"99tAISan9A 91770 SaTI
TOT,
3996.90
A 11 Frw1.w<4a.eN. >. An lr.mrx<InuN
SMm RIM N lw«. Cin b—'? Tee
E. M.IiM AdEr.111�1 A11.rwI Iraln SI -N..bw o�10 r11M rrw. ilmw
$alnw
P. Nw.Iw «w bwn <anael.0 N. I.Nn11 10 Han Y.ri «x _abNO anT N M pwra:w. N Ib. AItWRe
CO.nN MI w rq.bliw..1 M. p<Ilwlxwl ryn
wnrM Is IR. AM
11, RIO.. • "TES' wr..r w iNmr 9 w 10 w w an «Nn.nr .Rmb IR.II M M.A parr N rwr .ppfc.nw.
• I` 12. Appinam Mrwr (A) IM .w m.wPr eAF in en.xl. ii <enxJ w.m•xr ..II b.x oll Xlr awl•R<anam ai A 1I <wrw, eM
Ib1 rear M NI w1 _N+w w awx w pwmn ro M rNw.E ..r aI lb. w....w. of n. NeeRMi1 I.rww. Cw1rN An.
IS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA C «no el , Snn 9e[n S[•i In ?.-- -...., N. lj- luAA ..............
t u AFnICNT
VON "ENE I .. .. ...._.. .. ... _.
r )e
Fj
APPLICATION BY TRANSFIROR
IS STATE OF CALIFORNIA Cann N --- SAR_ 10f,"[d1E10 ............. O.N ------ ......................
It L.. NwIb.I.M Ef.N CnI aM [ip C.A. CARL,
! Oo NN MIEN F.br TAe, Lin.; For or eo.EN U.. One,
AFMbM Q Rw.rEN AAFF.,
O FLtiRIY PPe. --------------------
OR.... Rh N.......... jFN E. .... ......................... aEIw.I ................. A1w4. N" ---- ------ .....-••-
� orrr( I
}
5 � S7A71lC.
�r1m�rCIL S
F.lt�,l/dA l�enF
YAQI�iuL Ae A
F SS
TM"'T CAQL:S
Erurc S(C.
Snv./ S
L — – _ l9'A STQLerr
•
-&a FucA,L,dR �Lse is Locor£o Nj Uo�iffE
i2aOe,2 o6 /44 STQeer -fa A&I SAZD
-J
IPO &N CUe&A1rU ;ZaVD ° 10! – Vei6 �f�e v %i11 krAc
A(ex7# o L -1" llevs,T7 2 -v Du4IAc.
F_ �r ,°, M II - Meirtnn I�tsA Zkus,7✓ 142V Dds�A,
Sou7�i o° LM- IaJ Ae" TMwY 24 Dui /AC
wfv'ST o oQ- b�aY ��ilo�efS /O.U/FC
l7"a,IAL 1PL h u o deja#Lvch 10D Ian m ea c
Alm r,4 8 4- 4 DU't /AC.
F_A -sr e M I�- Me►luun F�/s!F l�uc,lf lJ -nl ac's /Alc.
seu`rl, d IN- M.Lu.�.m7iws,ry �- I�'!Ju's /Az.
A
0
COPY__.........._... wma.....ma.'�._._.a...�
APNXa"O11 00a ALCO{gDC W12,04141 LKINfflfl
M1: OMrnrwrl N Ak.Wk faltraa. e«a.1
1901 frwAw San Bernardino
Sevawaa, Ca{f Hfle
..
"' • ° °'" °'r
M anhrwr+d h.r.aT aPWt lot
rt.n..tw«., A.Am..:
I I trof'.SI Of LICENSNSI
FEE NO. tp
O
CN S1IL; JEER 6 4VIE
RATPM 2L \CO
1pu
Eefotr„Aot ,'1/a4 "
{EC eeTrp
�v AM
GEOGRAMK/rl
CooE 615
oot.
Ittwi
]. NAAO(SI OF AERIGWlf51
To". a.nml
Ea. -on.,
BINAr Farzin
NASSERIt 9ahman
1. TYMSI Of TRANACMMS1
FEE
LK.
TYf!
'.:.4
E
900.00
41
' ^NAL FRG
196.50
4. Naw M amb..
Numero Ono Pizza CT 20
1 l.eaAatr of Mn.n -N.mNt as Lt.w
9999 Foothill 01,,d., 9102
Gry and La Cad. C"
Rancho Cacamonaa 91730 San Rernardim
TOTAL
{
406.50
6. It Mme.. Lkan.d. 7. AN h.mrM InrrN
«.m TYa..Rn. 41- 119664 tO Surrender upon issuance on umrnl Yee
f. Alahrr{ Aadr.0 OF ddf.roar Nato SI- tlurniw aM Snwl r..o, r..
Same
a
Y. Ne.. rye na bxn tM ^tM M. M11hon11 10 Na.. pr C ^NAM ano a at. M M. Alt«alx
t {.,hn of thermal Al, ar rpubaem N M. DtAMnnr pat
' amaa ro the Atra E' :•
• I I E.a.. a "YES" amm N .Nmr 9 « 10 an as gthothrn.m -e.th mall M d. «ltd ear at rbt aealnanea— am
12 AMIKunt W'sts (a) IMr mry manaE.r "Play" in arvd* hpnya pemwt -rll halt ell M. awlb<eMnl of a Lt.n.a.
;61 that Ir. -rll rot nolen or taut/ w potato to M vNaNd any of rho po.aent of th. Altahollt ",*rag* Cemnl All
u Vote Of CASI"NIA caunq m. Son. Rarnaxdlnv ------- Y...._..- -. -_..
w ma....m. rv..t...
n, xrv.y- .tatrmw �
•..••MM
v
4h i.NA A •A+A M +-. •r �rrvr
• �- n w • w / fir r , - -
r
M M"ry
M
M1
I. a INICANt
GNNERE ... :-- _L::...__- .r ................ .........................
APPLICATION Rt TRANSFIRON
IS. STATE OF CALIMMIA c_., N ....... .... ........................... OaN..___.. -------. -----------
r
vMvx • xrwry M ... -rixv • .y..r, x-.rry ..v.r.«" rr at +in..t.. tr
../rat v w 4•x. ..n .- '1 AMr h�M..lovr
Do No Wree Sao. row Lima; F« 0-y0latrt i Uw 0*
Alt ch" O Rww4N.aetar
O RA d RAraaa
O- +..._.- _..-+-
I
oaks - waM "a
°-......--- -----
� c
. L1rtuF
U. ,newo
? „tC,uG 17th
uwaJ I6j
S rtmrr
tr
let
,Pn2(i n.0. I A4
Av
kfu ote& Uw 94fain 1 5 LncA -rep ou diie ,(1,PL7?/siD,9 oL
Fea4,tL SLua 6eTweed VIUeVWD ArJe 9vD LVo.o s7Xee;
lU.'kw file 6emeb eewne2.
rxo rClT�1 Cu drlenmp�oNru; GC'- �'mcuFC �eJn,nnrnRG
`x/1/I,.�arNG,vE i�cAl,.r1A S AlocriF /L -Lor,� dausry �PSrn�/dL
F »,T / Fiouf /IAr C.E,Wr»f /ItglC
.Sou7/i /Mil- A.(r�a.sr /iSNCiEasrTY
.11S, �.r�irgC
•,Qitoea,iC7 %�eN a QomrnlrC.rrL
�U1iI CCA.7 l%raiar; �_ M -117-W L - Lj deu.,; v Z,, :.`1c
oFST / eommeee lu.
':^ru'Li //yl Fl- /Rni�6,u dRUSrT/
,PCL, ZYAJr/RL
WEST /Cem.r!ldral[ ;�
. ORDINANCE NO. 229
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A HOME MORTGAGE FINANCING
PROGRAM FOR MODERATE AND LOW- INCOME FAMILIES FOR THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ( the
"City ") proposes to undertake a home mortgage financing program (the 'Program ")
pursuant to Chapters I -5 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code
of the State of California (the "Act ") for persona and families within the
income limits established by the Act, and proposes to issue revenue bonds
pursuant to the Act to provide funds for the Program;
WHEREAS, there is a shortage of decent, safe and sanitary housing,
particularly of housing affordable by persons in the lower end of the
purchasing spectrum, and a consequent need to encourage the construction of
homes affordable by such persons and otherwise to increase the housing supply
for such persons in the City; and
is WHEREAS, the authorization, issuance and sale of mortgage revenue
bonds under the Act represents a means of providing funds at below market rates
for the purpose of financing such housing;
NOW, THEREFORE:
SECTION 1: Adoption of Howe Mortgage Financing Progr N
Based upon the findings of the City Council, the City hereby adopts
the Program pursuant to the Act for the purpose of increasing the housing
supply for moderate and low - income families in the City.
SECTION 2: Findings
The City Council hereby finds and declares that:
(a) Decent housing is an essential motivating force in helping people
to achieve self - fulfillment in a free and democratic society;
(b) A healthy housing market is one in which residents of this state
have a choice of housing opportunities and one in which the housing consumer
may effectively choose within the free market;
/0
Ordinance No. 229
Page 2
(c) There exists within the City a shortage of housing available to
moderate and low - income persons, as such persons are now or hereafter defined
by the provisions of the Mr, and that this shortage is exacerbated during
periods of rising interest rates, particularly as high interest rates have the
effect of diminishing the number of otherwise creditworthy buyers from
qualifying for private sector mortgage capital sources, and in order to remedy
this adverse effect on potential homebuyers on the low end of the purchasing
spectrum, it is necessary to implement a public program to reduce the cost of
mortgage financing for single family purchases for those persons unable to
compete for mortgage financing in the conventional mortgage market; and
(d) It is necessary, in order to implement a public program to reduce
the cost of mortgage financing, to authorize long -term, low - interest mortgages
to persons not presently eligible for financing through private sector lending
institutions to finance construction, rehabilitation and acquisition of homes,
and in order to finance the Program, to issue mortgage revenue bonds to fund
the Program.
SECTION 3: Liberal Construction
The provisions of this Ordinance, being necessary for the welfare of
the City and its inhabitants shall be liberally construed to effect the purpose
of the Program. •
SECTION 4: Effective Date
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the
same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once
in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published In the City
of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California. This Ordinance will take effect immediately upon adoption pursuant
to Health and Safety Code Section 52031. The facts constituting the public
purpose of this Ordinance are the findings of the City Council set forth in
Section 2.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Ist day of August, 1994.
AYES;
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk //
•
0
•
E
I BELOUD AND PIANNERINO
Attorneys at Law
2 9330 Baseline Road, Suite 100
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
3
4. Telephone: 714/960 -1100
511 Attorneys for Claimant
0'
,II
O
10
11 BETTY GEAN BALL
i
12 1 vs.
Ii
13'ICITY OF ONTARIO, CITY OF
RANCHO CUCArdONGA, COUNTY OF
14 SAN BERNARDINO, AND STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
15
IG�j TO THE CITY OF ONTA
1711 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STA
18i You are hereby noti
19 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cuca
90 San Bernardino, claims damage
21 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF 5
i
22i'CALIFORNIA in the amount of $
23, This claim is based
24 claimant or, or about May 9, 1
25 section on Archibald Avenue a
26 California, county of San Bern
27 stances:
28 //
p
QC.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P.DMINISTRr.T10N
JUL 13 1984
4189 IDAI2(1A314A6
CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES
(Section 911.2 of the GOVERNMENT
CODE)
RIO, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
TE OF CALIFORNIA:
fied that BETTY GEAN HALL of 8272
monga, CA 91730, county of
s from the CITY OF ONTARIO, CITY OF
AN BERNARDINO, and STATE OF
100,000.00.
on personal injuries sustained by
984, in the vicinity of the inter -
an 4th Street, Rancho Cucamonga,
ardino, under the following circ=-
I On May 9, 1984, claimant (Driver !lo. 1) was traveline
2, eastbound in the left turn lane cf 4th Street to turn northbound
Ji on Archibald Avenue. Driver No. 2 was southbound in the No. 1
4�',, lane of Archibald Avenue. Both drivers entered the intersection
;0 at the same time as both had a Green light causing a collision.
G!I It was discovered that there was a malfunction in the traffic
sicnal box. As a result, claimant was severely injured. the
8i extent of which are presently unknown.
The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of
loll this claim is computed as follows:
il :i Damages incurred to date ........................Unknown
,
12 Expenses for medical and hospital care.......... Unknown
13 Loss of Earnings ........ ........................Unknown
11 General Damages....... .....................G100,000.
IS
Total Damages Incurred to Date ...... ............Unknown
1G Estimate] Property Damages ......................Unknown
1711 i Future Expenses for Medical and Hospital Care—Unknown
ii
Other Prospective Special Damages. Unknown
19
Total Amount of Claim as of Date of Presentation.. Unknown
20i All notices or other communications with regard to
2111 this claim should be sent to claimant's attorney at 9330 Baseline
22.1 Road, Suite 100, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701.
I
2311 DATED: July 11, 1984
24I BELO ND MANNERINO
25 / 1/
2GI 0
BY:
27 JOHN D. MANN INO
Attorney foyr�laimant
28
-2-
•
•
0
1I
21
3
4
5
6
71
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.A I k 111 C 111(;•. _ :.. :( : I
1 \il III ( \III, B N IL %.(OI \T1 OF
�. :..,, :
,..d „,....In „ur,nmr,nnm:J1 „�n +n lxm n,r,✓n;ru,m.,,n.. ,.., �,, .�., ��.,, ,,. ;,. u. ,, �. .,,�.,, ,, ., ..,, .�,
+....n,,,r :n. + + +„ nrLr a n, n, ,n,,+ ills, 1 1. 1, . ;. : +, r :,,u
I do w.r a +:dr, pinnin u/rrnun :M1Vr :hr 1'orr¢ ^mR n ,mr and rmr,n
C,.,vrrd an er_ ( j/d
PROOF OF SERVICE R1 %I IM 11011a. ]m( 5C C Y r
ST i it OF (A I. I FOR CIA. COL.\TY OF LOS ANGELES
m m mr n+onm aln.no:d. I am mo:M1r oer q/nyhrnn +.an anJ nor o roan m In, x nhn,, nn,;,.. e, a +,n m.. „ ,n..
'd, .... n
9330 Baseline Road, Suite 100, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
On July 12 ,ry 84 ,/rcnrd lAr .nx +n CLAIii FOR PERS071AL
INJURIES (SECTION 911.2 of the GOVERNMENT CODE)
+n rnr interested narties
_
in ,,d✓a".n n: ylvnnpa rrv, In, rhoro(,n,hI,d m a ,rolyd rmrinpr nI1 r-Iuvr Inr,ron mil, prrpu,c u: rnr (n✓,d sill .. ...a :.
Rancho Cucamonga, California
„I
edd,rurd e, l:dln.,I
—!_V
CITY OF ONTARIO
CITY OF RA:JCHO CLC:i \1J�GA
CLERK OF THE CITY OE Oi,TARIO
CLEW: OF HE CITY OF RANCHO C1,CAMO "X',A
CITY FLAIL
CIn' PALL
303 EAST "B" STR IET
9320 BASELI::E ROAD
ONTARIO, CA 91764
RANCiIO CL)Z%mDNGA CA 91701
COUJTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE. OF CALIFORNIA
CLERK OF T11E ROARD OF SUPERVISORS STA +TC BOARD OF CONTROL
175 WEST 5th STRFET
OJVER:LENT CLAIMS SECTION
SAN BER.NARDINO, CA 92415
926 "J” STRFEr,SUITE 300
l er;lr„r :n. ✓rr rrnnm If p,,.,,. M., h, r,rrx
" :ne +I I-, Wn"PAM, CA 95814
July 12, 1984.____ar
Rancho Cucamonga
clr.eLe nn
' Iddw,.
y urr- --
s •.nnvr
i ISARPM CISNIHIS
1iIRA H. ZINCHEFSKY
THE LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD G. ANDREWS ��`C., ����� �•
2 205 West 20th Street
Santa Ana, California 92706 -2760 -'
3II (714) 972 -0276
4
5I I
611 1 CLAIM OF JON LANDBERG, ) CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES
(Government Code 4910)
7I1 )
> RECslrEO
81,1 vs ) CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNCA
ADMINISTRr THON
9 )
JUL 29 N4
10 :11 THE CITY OF RANCHO ) AN
CUCAMONGA ) 9h1hI 991
too
12 1
131 TO: THE CITY CLERK, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1
141i' YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that claimant JON LANDBERG claims damages
151 from THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA in the amount of $54,500.00
1611 and makes the following statement in support of his claim:
17'. 1. Claimant's address is 989 Victoria, Apt#Gl, Costa Mesa,
18, California, 92627.
19 2.' Notice concerning this claim should be sent to the
201 Law Office of Richard G. Andrews, 205 West 20th Street, Santa
21, Ana, California, 92706 -2760.
221 3. This claim is based on personal injuries sustained by
23',. claimant on April 24, 1984, in the Victoria Country Club, in the
241'1 City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino.
2511, 4. At the above time and place, claimant was attempting
1
2811 to release a hose from a fire hydrant, and tripped over piping
2711 immediately adjacent thereto causing him to fall into an
28 excavation next to the hydrant severely injuring his back.
-I- /Y
it
1,
Due to this dangerous condition of said property, and due to
1
2.
the above - mentioned public entity's negligent and reckless
3
ownership, maintenance, and control of such condition, and
411
negligent and reckless failure to warn, protect and correct
gill
such dangerous condition, although it should, and could have
81�
reasonably done so, and was on actual constructive notice to
7j11
do so, as a result thereof, claimant was seriously and
permanently injured thereby.
9�!
5. The names of the public employees causing claimant's
10i
injuries are unknown.
11,1 i
6. The claim to date is $54,500.00 and continuing.
12i
7. The basis, for the claim is:
13ii
(a) Medical Expenses $ 2,500.00
ib
(b) Estimated Future Medical
Expenses 2,000.00
15„
18'',
(c) Loss of Wages Estimate 20,000.00
17.,
(d) General Damages 30,000.00
18
TOTAL $ 54,500.00
19
20,
/
Dated; P
211
THE LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD G. ANDREWS
22
23!!
e
2411
on behalf of claimant.
2511,
26,1
2711
i
28
/s
( V ER IF ICA TION — 16. 2011.7 C, C. P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
lam
rn IAr a6arc "t"la I'll" or pntrrol.(: I Mn rmG At
and Anow IAr rwnnu Mrrco% end I "Illy Thal IM ram.O Inn -f MY awn Anow/N(t, "pl u to IAarr manrN wkirh arc 1Aann
nard Ypan a" /unnatlan or Mllrl, and m la Ihon manrl 16rllrrr 11 11 M Imr.
£vmVd
I drrlarr. under prnaby o/ pmJY,Y. I*., a, jar,,a,, 1, Irv, and .wort.
SI(MIYN
Cah/arma
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL 11013., 20U.5 C C. P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE
1 d a rnldrm of iAe cowry aJarcrale: / am onr rAr at o /rl(A1rrn Yran and mat a parry 10 (At w0hln mgdrd,,I /an: mY 6YImnI
Jrm u
205 West 20th Street, Santa Ana, CA 92706 -2760
Oa .T+1 12 3a3R4 .19 R4 Ilrrrri,he MtA1n C1AII.1 FOR PFR ON T IN toy
M lhr interested parties
rn raid
by a1 I, $,,,, pY h /md..j In alra/rdrnn /opr wllA pan ( r0rrrw dl
/ Y prepaid. in 'be Unurd Smut mod
add mro aI Jollonr
The City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Ea.rYlro an July 12 1984 ,I Santa Ana
n r
fpfi`"j , Call/omio
l Mrlarc; Yndrr M'nallY NMMn'• IMI tM /art(aM(U rrur ant tarns.
�G 1A // / of
•
•
�•• av ,, a.vnaravavvt� GVGMC)�
STAFF REPORT'
7
ii J p
a" U
DATE: August 1, 1984 1977
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 8597 located on the east side of Vineyard
Avenue between Ninth Street and Arrow Route submitted by Lozier
Corp. Item continued from July 18, 1984 meeting.
Parcel Map 8597 was tentatively approved by the Planning Commission on
July 11, 1984 for the division of 37.75 acres of land in the General
Industrial /Rail Served District (Subarea No. 2) into 2 parcels located on the
east side of Vineyard Avenue between Ninth Street and Arrow Route.
Off -site improvements will be constructed at time of building permit issuance
for Parcel No. 2.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
Parcel Map 8597 and authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign same.
Re pectfully sub tted,
LSH :jaa
Attachments
77
0
9
9
L
C17i' OF RANCHO CUCAij tONCA
ErK.WEERINC DIVISION A
WINITY AIAP 1 \I
title.;
Page
eve /xeew-
rr�acFn
rr'w. vuc eNVnsfP
30 fV((/J 4KxVf
wLi SeIOIA
I
.EGCIJ0
PARCEL MAP N0. 8597
IN WE C117 OAR!/' ✓CN7 CUCA /^ONGA
t/xaawvnuvarmrr //auv /r rrr2:•spv a /cs /o. nre.
OAE4v/NE4 e5 Fe'i Yec Jf:.v�E• h 1,
Y Os I<Lr ee "I'll, SJNA�PN.iMA'xL C.X/M1 71, SiCry
M,
CA( /FL >N/-0
�1
j,.
w'
_x a.
LP %W hf)V IE
FEE .p i
nNF rFHO b'[NUE
r=a
hINH—LI-41
rvv �a� SaMNS-
i9
p',
�a
c8
,,rr /, r
ner /P.Gf
eoCMifN iMN
Po e0/ /PB
r.a NEH <S+Y LfiM/
� I
_ M
's•
I
V lrl:llES (:Er /NO �-
eV( ulbJA
mrewsowar ar,re(rw+4f ro
r .nr5nf'.x/. r +xr
�r'e1 /en
b5 �( + /dMU ei3
u oNrJ
:r'4I [K nmue(annn rvirf4erS+IY/
nrll 0.V +( «i WQ � JJ
Mn :brr rn nv
M':a��rnv�rnx nun'rcrPor n+ /fo mta
P UILti'�
'I T
VK /NIIY MI P
•
i
;. �
P.fR: EL 2
PoY. EL l
aaav s
•o un h[
w'
_x a.
LP %W hf)V IE
FEE .p i
nNF rFHO b'[NUE
r=a
hINH—LI-41
rvv �a� SaMNS-
i9
p',
�a
c8
,,rr /, r
ner /P.Gf
eoCMifN iMN
Po e0/ /PB
r.a NEH <S+Y LfiM/
� I
_ M
's•
I
V lrl:llES (:Er /NO �-
eV( ulbJA
mrewsowar ar,re(rw+4f ro
r .nr5nf'.x/. r +xr
�r'e1 /en
b5 �( + /dMU ei3
u oNrJ
:r'4I [K nmue(annn rvirf4erS+IY/
nrll 0.V +( «i WQ � JJ
Mn :brr rn nv
M':a��rnv�rnx nun'rcrPor n+ /fo mta
P UILti'�
'I T
VK /NIIY MI P
•
•
•
9
Ile
r,
PARCEL MAP N -5W O. 8
11 1W
- - - - --------
r�111,411 f1c, Wt's -
�n
11-� 4 il
VICIVII, Ii4P
• RESOLUTION NO. 84 -201
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8597
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8597)
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8597, submitted by Lozier
Corporation and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the east side of Vineyard
Avenue between Ninth Street and Arrow Route, being a division of Lots 11 and
12 Subdivision of Lot 10, Cucamonga Vineyard Tract as recorded in Book 20 of
Maps, Page 44 of San Bernardino County, State of California, was apprnved on
July 11, 1984 by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 8597 is the final map of the division of
land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 8597 be and the same
is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the
County Recorder to be filed for record.
• PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of August, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Aut a et, City erk
jaa
•
30
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
0
•
P
I �T' n w,nR nlrnA.r '11.
STAFF REPORT .
��
z! 2
n
1Z
1 r>
DATE: August 1, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Bonds and Agreement for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 6179
located on the west aide of Cottage Avenue, south of 8th Street
submitted by Edward L. Mayhew
Mr. Edward Mayhew has submitted the attached bonds and agreement to guarantee
the construction of street improvements for his project located on the west
side of Cottage Avenue, south of 8th Street.
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting
the bonds and agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same.
Respectfully s witted,
LBH:BK:jaa
Attachments
:Z —1-
0
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
N
ENGINEERING DIVISION
u Ez
�> vlclNlry nvkr
1917
23
page
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR
seieet - omvenentp :o^ ?=cal ', of lionsel ' ".a^ No. Ei94
KAOY ALL MEN ay THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is
made and entered into, in conformance with the orav it ions of the
Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referr-
ed to as the City, by and between said City
and Edward L. Yavhew hereinafter referred to as
LIn eveloper.
THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain
real property in said City located on the w side or - nttaae ;Fence
1"
L'2+_',.P- 21 3th 5tr1 et_: and
WHEREAS, said City has estat'ished certain reauireaerts
to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting pf final
approval; and
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of
improvement security as hereinafter cited, a" approved by the
City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of
said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed oy and between the
City and the Developer as foilo•s:
1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at
developer's expense all improvements oats. ited on page d nereof
within 12 months from the date hereof.
2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the
resolution of the Council of said City approving this
agreement. This agreement shall he in default on the day follow-
ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten-
sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid-
ed.
J. The Developer may request add, tional time in which
to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less
than 70 days prior to the default date, and including a statement
of Circumstances of necessity for additional time. in Considera-
tion of Such request, the City reserves the right to review the
Provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost
estimate, and sufficiency of the Improvement security, and to
require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes
therein,
4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with
the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right
at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any law-
ful means, and thereupon to recover from Said Developer and /or
his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing.
5. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Devel-
oper from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any
work within the public right -of -way, and the developer shall
conduct such work in fail compliance with the regulations
contained therein. Non- compllante may result in stopping of the
work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided.
6. Public right -of -way improvement work required shall
he Constructed in cnnfdrmance with approved improvement plans,
Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special
.I-
S.F.. D.R„ Res., P,M. dDD
0
amendments thereto. Construction shall in,' ace any transitions
and /or other incidental work deemed necessary fpr drainage or
public safety. Errors or ommissions discovered during CpnStruc-
tion shall be Corrected upon the di recti0. of the City
Engineer. Revised work due to said plan ,odificat ions shall be
covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the
surety covering the original planned narks.
J. Work done within existing streets shall be diligent -
Ty pursued to completion; the City ih a 11 have the r g h *. t0
complete any and all work in the event of unDU sti f 4 9 d delay
completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred iron one
Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful neani.
9. The Developer shall be responsible °ae reo'icenert,
relocations, or removal of any component of any ' -igai � .,atx-
system in conflict with the required Bork to tine satisfic::on 0
the City Engineer and the owner of the water systan.
9. The Developer shall be resaons !:1e 'or removal of
all loose rock and other debris fro, the publ is
10. The Developer shall Plant and -a,ntain parSoay
trees as directed,by the Community Develocnent ectoe.
11. The improvement security to be f ri5heJ by t-be
Developer to guarantee c"olation of the terns C this a7r=_e•,en:
Shall be subject to the approval of the City Atto - ;�" , P-1- •
Cleo) amount of said improvement security 5 +all ^ t ass :, .
the amount shown:
_1_
r
•
0
DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED
E
O-
r .C,
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
Type:
Pr c la al :mart: $12,000.00
Name and
address of surety:
MATERIAL AND LABOR
Type:
prnncipa! ++lavnt: 5 6,000.00
Name and
address Of surety:
CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION
Type:
Pr'acl;al A1O11t: N/A
—
Name and
address of surety:
TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the part+as beat; ' caased [hest
presents
to be duly executed and aCknOd!edne .x1tha ! fjria litie5
required
Dy law an the dates set forth opposite te'r si3natures.
-1/s-11yF %%%«.�1.,
Data
br Cry..,r,. /. - �elel "Del
,
•.
nted
z"dL
AI�R
Ddla
by eoo'_'.pp..r
Signature
VC %0 CaVxry
Nf
Printed
AD.e Pted:
Z �\ OFFICIAL SLot
pl. D. SHOWALTER
City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California
?n �swN.'Nmu
A Municipal
Corporation wuar
7 nn uwm .. n aM
By:
layor
Attest
City C 1 a re �
r ,
Approved:
•r! 7
I City At Mro Pey
DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED
E
O-
r .C,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •
ENGINEERING DIVISION
ICROACHNENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
For Improvement: -
Date: :- it 11, unpute y:
File Re erence: Parcel Map 6179 City Drawing no.
NOTE: Does not include current fee for
writing permit or pavement deposits
QUANTITY
UNIT
'TEM
PRICE
MOUNT
L.F.
P.C.C. curb - IZ' C.F. 24" gutter
7.25
lc3
L.F.
P.C.C. curb - a- C.F, 24^ gutter
6.00
_
L.F.
P,C.C. curb only
5.50
_
L.F.
A.C. berm
4.50
^:3
S.F.
4" P.C.C. sidewalk
1.75
_
'
S.F.
Drive approach
2,50
J-
S.F.
8" P.C.C. cross gutter (inc, curb)
JAO
C.Y.
Street excavation
1.50
C.Y.
Imported embankment
1,50
S.F.
Preparation of subgrade
0.15
S.F,
Crushed agg. base (per inch thick)
- 0.03
_
TON
A.C. (over 1300 tons)
27.00
TON
A.L. (900 to 1700 tons)
35.00
TON
A.C. (500 to 900 tans)
45.00
_
TON
A.C. (under 500 tans)
60.00
S.F.
A.C. (3" thick)
0.55
S.F.
Patch A,C. (trench)
1.75
--
S.F.
1" thick A.C. overlay
0.30
EA.
Adjust sewer manhole to grade
250.00
EA.
Adjust sewer clean out to grade
150.00
=
EA.
EA.
Adjust later valves to grade
Street
Street lights
Barricades $500
75.00
I000.00
1.00
L.F.
L.F.
min)
redwood header
2 a 4" redwood header
1.75
--
S.F.
Removal of A.C, pavement
0.35
L.F.
Removal of P.C.C. Curb
3,30
L.P.
Removal of A.C. berm
1.00
EA.
Street signs
200.00
EA.
Reflectors and posts
35.00
L.F.
Concrete block wall
25.00
S.F,
Retaining wall
20,00
TON
Aggregate base
7.00
C.Y.
Concrete structures
425.00
"
L.F.
18" RCP (2000 0)
29.00
- --"
L.F.
24" RCP (1500 0)
35.00
L.F.
36^ RCP (2000 D)
49.00
--
L.F.
48" RCP (1200 0)
76.00
EA.
Catch basin H , 4'
2000.00
EA,
Catch basin N + 8'
2900,00
EA.
Catch basin N • 22'
4500.00
EA.
Local depression 4'
500.00
EA,
Local depression 12
1000.00
EA.
Junction structure
5000.00
�-
EA.
Outlet structure, Std 1506
1500.00
-`
EA,
Outlet structure, Std 1507
500.00
EA.
Guard posts
40.00
-
L.F.
Guard panel (wood)
25,00
L.F.
Sawcut
2.00
-
EA.
Headwall (AB" wing)
4000.00
13i
L.F.
Redwood header
1.75
_31
S,F.
Landscaping S Irrigation
2.75
--
L.F,
Roll curb (P,C.C.)
7.50
ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE 6600.00 TOTAL
CONTINGENCY RESTORATION/DELINEATION CASH +- CONTINGENCY COSTS
DEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE) ( FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (ZOOS) +000.00
MONUMEHTAT ION SURETY ([ASH) N/A LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (501) ,61000-0n
Mprseant to City of Rantho CotanoW Munitipal Cade, Title I, Chapter 1.08, adopting SAN
lernardlm County Code Titles, Chapters 1.5, a ash rettoratimidelimatim depoalt Stoll
be made prior to issuance of 0 Engineering Constructim Permit.
•
➢oral so.
Precrax: 6216.00
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BON0
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of ;antra Cucamonga,
State of California, and LDdARD L. ::AYKLw
(hereinafter designated as 'print :pa nave entered :Ito am
agreement whereby principal agrees to `nstall and complete
certain designated public improvements, ankh said agreement,
dated 1984 , and Identified as
fril jpo
project Parce �M ap 3I7➢is Eby refer r =ta and made a part
hereof; and,
WHEREAS, said principal is regu ired under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NON, THEREFORE, we the princip at and TiL OHIO CASUALTY I14SURA14CE COMIPAN
as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the ty o an hh0
Cucamonga (hereinafter called "CityH), in the penal sum of Twelve
thousand and 00 /100 Dollars ($12,000.00) lawful money of the
United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be
made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and
administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all tnings stand to and abide by,
and well and truly keeo and perform the covenants, condi ti ors and
provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made
•
as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and
performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in
all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and
shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and
employees, as therein stipulated, then this obi i gat ion shall
become hull and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full
force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to
the face amount specified therefor, [here shall be included costs
and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's
fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation,
all to be taxed as costs and included i0 any judgment rendered.
r es
The s surety hereby stipulates and agree that no change,
extension time, alteration or addition the [erns the
agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the speci.
fications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its
obligations on this hand, and it does hereby waive notice of any
such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by
the principal and surety above named, a Sure }, ,
:9s�'
EL'WARD L. KAMW ',HE UHIO CACUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
(Developer) urety
41,
9n atu re (Attorney-in ar.t
Cordon C. Hill
PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS
SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED
f"-ft" -
Bond :lo. 2— 6 -0?2
Previva: Incl. in PerT. Bond
LAIOR AND NATERIALMEN BOND •
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and A i L 4: ' —
(hereinafter designated as "pr-nc spa " ave entered into an
agreement whereby orincipal agrees to in itA I and coma let
certain designated pu0t is improvements, which said agreement,
dated April 27, ' 1984 , and identified
as project arce ap 3179 is hereby re er•ed —' a and Wade a part
hereof; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is
required before entering upon the performance of the nark, to
file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made in
Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 3 of Division 3
of the Civil Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material
men and other persons employed in the performance of the
aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of
Civil Procedure in the sum of Six thousand and 00 /100 Dollars
(S6,000,00), for materials furnished or labor thereon of any
kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment insurance Act
with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the
same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth,
and also in case suit is brought upon this bona wi11 pay in
addition to the face amount thereof, costs• and reasonable
expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred
by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded
and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as casts and ti be •
included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and
corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 !commencing
with Section 3082) of Part 4 of 3ivison 3 of the Civ it Code, so
as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any Suit
brought upan this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then
this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be
and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change,
extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said
agreement or the specif lcetions accompanying the same shall in
any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here.
by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or
addition.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by
the principal and surety above named, a Suue y,
1964. _
EDWARD L. KAYIGSW THE CHIC CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPAi
1. / eve ope ry Wre y
[Signature ( thin -fact
Gordon C. Hill
PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS
SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED •
.I 9
• RESOLUTION NO. 08..04--� F4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 8179
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on
August 1, 1984, by Edward L. Mayhew as developer, for the improvement of
public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located on the west side of Cottage Avenue, south of
8th Street; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning
Commission, Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 8179; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by
good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said
• Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of August, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
Jae
U
IK
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
0
•
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 1, 1984
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: John Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer
. w
aw
1977
SUBJECT: Approval Bonds and Agreement and Final Map of Tract No. 12332 -1
located on the east side of Haven Avenue at the north City Limits
submitted by Walter Laband
The subject tract is the first phase subdivision of 53 lots of a total of 204
lots on 142 acres on the east side of Haven Avenue north of Hillside Channel at
the north City Limits. The tract was tentatively approved by the Planning
Commission on May 11, 1983., The attached agreement and security has been
approved by the City Attorney as submitted by Mr. Walter H. Laband,
owner /subdivider. The security offered is a time deposit receipt in the name of
the City for $980,117.00 to guarantee completion of street and storm Main
improvements.
RBCOWMATIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
the Final Map of Tract No. 12232-1, Improvement Agreement and Security and
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same.
Attachments
3/
,r � y i • ohm �, ', = � Y , t� �, y - � � I� - � .� �,I I ,
+� v f ;r /y5y ". a1�1 q�P.{.`�. Y� Y j"1�: ^fib ,t •5��i
If IF
it
�u
iy
i �
� /•'q .ID �11 j �iJ�'�� .'i4 a3. f T� r
'
it'•• rs !L (1.3, � r r
�1 Z l'�� 31r�
t
ry i
,r � y i • ohm �, ', = � Y , t� �, y - � � I� - � .� �,I I ,
+� v f ;r /y5y ". a1�1 q�P.{.`�. Y� Y j"1�: ^fib ,t •5��i
If IF
it
CHAFFEY JffN�T UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
0
0000
July 13, 1984
Letter of Certification
of School District Capacity
• �r A
Within the Chaffer Joint Union Hiah School District attendance boundaries
for the following described project:
Location /Description: Tract No. 12332 - 1
Haven above Wilson
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Number of Dwellings: 53 single family dwellings (n6 r)
Anticipated Completion Date: unknown
The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 8
students will be provided within 24 months of the completions the
above project. This certification is given on the condition that the
State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G.
Greene Lease /Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner
that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects
under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The
commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this
letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits
by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90 -day period shall validate
such commitment.
•
/ sst. Superintendent
by Dianne Allen -
cc: Planning Division �1L�
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Assoc. Engineers
Attn: Phil Douglas
P. 0. Box 9419 •
Ontario, CA 91761
33
rI
Alta Loma School District
93501' 04seline Road . ['1151 011ke floe 370 • Alw Loma. California 91701 a 714/9a7-0766
1 II1I5 _June 25, 1984
Date
WI\P.II UI INU \IllS
WIM 14, S IRUST
1Y1N1 III R IANIi L MAN
\1N, I V I'll l.\N191
'.INS AN I IIA A IIIAt
1i 111% I, n111 1A
JOHN E. WMURTRY
SYpMnn.d.M
nOYD M. STORK
hnonneVSuppon S.,v$ms
STACY NELSON
SYHnw S.M.
MILLI STRAIN
IJ:'I'7•I:R OF CERTIFICATION FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY
For Residential Construction within. the Alta Loma
School District.
nPa'IiLOP hR Associated_ Ennineers
TRACT NI1.viR1>R 12332_1 LOCATION Top of Haven Avenue
NUMBER OF DIi I'LLINC UNI'T'S_ 53 single family LOTS
• A.NTTCIPATED COMPLETION DATE
Cent lemen:
The Alta Loma School District hereby certifies that the
Rapacity for 31.8 students will be provided within
24 months of the completion of the above project. This
certification is given on the condition that the State
of California continues to fund the provisions of the
Leroy P. Greene Lease /Purchase Act of 1976, or any suc-
cessor Act, in such manner that the State Allocations
Board may fund all school building projects under its
current rules and regulations without priority points.
The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from
the dato of this letter. Approval of the final map or
the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga within that 90day period shall validate such
commitment.
Very truly yours,
Floyd M. afnrk
Administrator
Personnel and Support Services
lh 34
cc: Planninq Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga
Reference: Develooment Code Section 17.08.050 -C.1
G Vk,-P...
ROBERT NEUFELD
Sm'.' ., 0—, Mmwnr.
CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MICHAEL
' EARLE R. ANDERSON
VICTOR A. CHERBA K, JR., P-1-1 BEVERLY E. BRADEN CHARLES A. WEST
June 26, 1984
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Engineering Department 1
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
. a01Nf E4.NI: OY"!L:I
Attention: Mr. John Martin
Gentlemen:
The W.H.L. Corporation, developer of Tract No. 12332 -1, situated
in Rancho Cucamonga, has paid all fees due, and deposited with the •
District a Letter of Credit covering the water system improvements
needed to sufficiently service the subject tract. Upon completion
of the water system improvements to the specifications of the
District, an ample supply of potable water for normal use and fire
protection will be available and will be furnished on demand, with-
out exception, to each and every lot within the development.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact
the undersigned.
Yours truly,
CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
41_�17a4dw zl�'�
Russel C. Silva
Engineering Aide III
bf
cc: Associated Engineers
ATTN: Philip Douglas
3'
•
DEPARTMENT OF TRA*PORTATIONI
FLOOD CONTROLIAIRPORTS
819 t Third Street . San Bern",,o, CA 924154815 • (714) 383•
March 12, 1984
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ENVIRONMENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
File: 1- 552/2.04
W. H. Laband
3311 East Cameron
West Covina, California 91791
Attention: Mr. W. H. Laband
Re: Zone 1, Hillside Channel
PERMIT NO. P- 184016
Gentlemen:
Your request for permission to connect to an existing 60" stub out located on
Hillside Channel east of Haven Avenue in the north portion of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga can be recommended for approval by the Flood Control Engineer. Your
copy of the permit will be mailed to you upon receipt of the Inspection Fee in
• the amount of $300.00 and the attached Certificate of Insurance (Certificates on
this form only will be acceptable).
Your check should be made payable to the San Bernardino County Flood Control
District and should show District file and permit numbers as referenced above.
If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Mr. Jim Dunn,
Permits Section at (714) 383 -1739.
WMC: rc
Attachment as noted
•
34,
(Very truly yours,
WILLIAM M. COLLINS, Permit Engineer
Flood Control District
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR
HAVEN VI-a SS ^A ?ES
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is
made end entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the
Subdivision Map Act 0f the State of California, and of the
applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, a municipal Corporation, by and between said City,
hereinafter referred to as the City, and
.A H, - hereinafter referred to as [ne
eve o er.
WITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, said Oeveloper des,res to develop certain
real property in said City as shown on the Conditionally approved
subdivision known as rx.rt :2333 -t : and
WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements
to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said
subdivision generally located at Haven Avenue Nor -h of Hutaie.
ooa c.tmt channel.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by
Slid Developer as follows:
1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at
. Developer's expense all improvements described on Page 6 here-
of within twelve months from the effective date hereof.
2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the
resolution of the Council of said City approving this
agreement. This agreement shalt be in default on the day follow -
fog the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten-
sion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid.
Ad.
3. The Developer may request an extension of time to
complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to
the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration
date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances
necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the
right to review the provisl0 ns of this agreement, including the
construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security,
and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has
occurred during the term hereof.
A. If the Developer falls or neglects to comply with
the provisions of this agreement, the City shall nave the right
at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful
means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety
the full cost and expense Incurred.
S. The Developer shall provide metered water service to
each lot of said development in accordance with the regulations,
schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Water District,
6. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement,
relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water
system In conflict With construction of required Improvements to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water
system.
-I-
37
A Tracts and Comm/Ind. P.M.
0
7. Improvements required to be constructed shall
confgrm to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of
the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file in
the office of the City Engineer. Said improvements are tabulated
on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated on
page 6 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon
by number. The Developer shall also be responsible for construc-
tion of any transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract
boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage.
Errors or ommisslons discovered during constructin shall be
corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work
due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions
of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original
planned works.
a. Construction permits shall be obtained by the
Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of
work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with
attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or
ether nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public
utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this
section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor.
9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of
all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within
or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to
said development.
30. Work done within existing streets shall be
diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the righlAM
to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay i
completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the
Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means.
11. Said Developer shall at all times following dedica-
tion of the streets and easements in said subidlvlsion, up to the
completion and acceptance of said work or improvement by said
City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling
Public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said
street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from
such defective or dangerous conditions.
Until the completion of all improvements, herein Incorporated on
Page 6 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as
improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer, Said
Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the
conditions contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued
by the City Engineer, when ever it is necessary to protect the
public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed
to be made.
12. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be
planted by the Developer after other improvement work, grading
And cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as
provided by Ordinance In accordance with the planting diagram
approved by the City Community Development Director,
The Developer shall be responsible (or maintaining all trees
planted in good health until the end of the guaranteed
maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is
later.
13. The Developer Is responsible for meeting all copol.
tions establlshed by the City pursuant to the Subdivision •
.2.
3?
f�
0
•
Map Act, City Ordiances, and this agreement for the development,
and for the maintenance of all improvemen [5 constructed
thereunder unt 11 the improvement IS accepted for maintenance by
the City, and no improvement security provided hereinwith shall
be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided one
authorized by the City Council of the City.
14. This agreement shall not terminate until the
maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been
released b the City, or until a new agreement together with the
required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a
successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City
Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the
Improvement security therefor has been released.
15. The improvement security to be furnished by the
Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and
shall be in a farm acceptable by the City Attorney:
A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement.
1. A band or bonds by one or more duly authorized
corporate sureties in the form and content
specified by Government Code Section 66499.1.
2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form
and content Specified by the City Attorney,
D. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable
bonds of the kind approved for securing
deposits of public monies.
6. To secure laborers and matenalmen;
1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized
corporate sureties in the form and content
specified by Government Code Section 65499.1.
2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the farm
and content specified by the City Attorney.
0. A deposit with City of money or negotiable
bonds of the kind approved for securing
C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment
by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose
certificate appears upon the final Map for the
setting of all boundary, lot corner, and street
centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline
tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit
may be any amount certified by the engineer or
surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no
value is submitted, the cash band shall be as shown
on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained
herein.
Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proce-
dure permits after receipt by the City Of the
centerline tie notes and written assurance of
payment In full from the engineer or surveyor.
The required bonds and the principal amounts
thereof are set forth an page 6 of this agreement.
16. The Developer warrants that the improvements
descr bed in this agreement shall be free from defects in
materials and workmanship. Any and all portions of the Improve-
ments found to be defect lve wi thln one (I) year following the
data on which the Improvements are accepted by the Clty shall be
repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the
City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee
security in a sum equal to ten percent (10 %) of the construction
3y
0
estimate or S200. 00, whichever is greater, to ugcure the fa, thfuI OOS as performance Of A O.tvera.e'sarainlee a Security shalet�l so securo the
,,a psi, The m 9u Y
/aithful performance b the Developer d( any nbliga 0M of the
De v e leper to d0 Specified walk with respect to Jny parkway
maintenance assessment district. Once the improvements have been
accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted
by the City, the other improvement security deem Ded ,n this
agreement may be released Provided that Such release IS otnerwlse
authorised by the Subdivision Map Act ono any applicable City
Ordinance.
17. That the Developer Shall take out Ind maintain Such
public liability and property damage insurance as Shall protect
him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work cuvered
by this agreement from claims for property damages which may
arise because of the nature of the work ar from operations under
this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any
contractor of subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly
employed by said persons, eVen though such oamanes Oe not cnu Sed
by the negligence of the Developer ur arif '.nntractor or
subcontractor Or anyone employed by said persons. the public
liability and property damage Insurance Shall list the City a$
additonal insured and directly protect the city, its officers,
agents and employees, as well as the Oevelooer, ors con v actor
and In" subcontractors, and all iosur)ncv nnIiCIOS issued
hereunder shall so state. The minimum amounts of suer Insurance
shall be as follows:
A. Contractor's liability insurance oravid,nq bodily
injury or death IlabiI ity Inn l is of not less the
S300,000 for each person and $1,Jr1D,000 for each
accident or occurrence, and property dm,iage i,abrl-
ity limits of not less than 5100,000 for each acci-
dent or Occurrence with an aggregate limit of
$250,000 for Claims which may ar,sa from the opera-
. tions of the Developer rn [he performance of the
work herein Provided.
0. Automobile liability rnsurancw covering all
vehicles used in the perronnenCe of this agreement
providing had, ly injury Ilabr I itv I,m, to of not
IesS than 5200,000 far each Person ono Sj00,000 for
each accident or occurrence, and Property damage
liability limits of not less than ;50,000 for each
accident or occurrence. ,ith in 19relate of not
less than 5100,000 which ,nay arise from the opera-
tionS of the Developer or his Contractor in
performing the work provided for heroin.
18. That before the eaecutron of this agreement, the
Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates
of insurance covering the specified insurance. Each Such
certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding the
Lance I at ions, or reduction in coverage of any policy evidences
by such certificate, before the expiration of thirty (70) days
after the Clty shall have received not,ficet,00 by registered
mail from the insurance carrier,
•
A$ evidence of understanding the provisions herein, and
of intent to comply with same, the $ubd,vider Iles submitted the
fallowing described improvement security, and has affixed his -
Signature hereto:
N0
•4-
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
Type: Tine Deposit Receipt P nc 1p al AmO a ot: S600 , 078
Name and address of Surety: Bank of America, Covina Branch
MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT
Type: Time Deposit Receipt Principal Amount: 5307,039
Name and address of surety: Bank of America, Covina Branch
CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION
Type: Cash Flint: "I S3'S5C.GO
Name and address Of surety:
MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE
Type: Bond Principal ronnunt: 560,000
Name and address Of surety:
TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OY THE CITY
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto havm caused those
presents to be duly executed and ac k now l nn,) no with al
• formalities required by law on the dates Se[ forth opens i to their
signatures. _
Date Uy I— 'tinig; t Oe velape
r
Ana f
Hatcer n. L. -1
f ln[tld
Date by ,Oev0lopar
gnature
Accepted:
City of Rancho
Cucamonga,
California
A Municipal
Corporation
By:
Mayor
Attest:
Icy erk
Approved:
DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED
S
7�
CITY OF RA \:NO 2UCAMONG.A •
CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
ENCROACNHENT PER417 FEE SCHEDULE
For Improvement of:
Tnct :2332 -1
Date: May (004
umPu:ed by:
Alsoclaild Enrtr
o
File Reference:
Cat' ow'. No.
843 and
6.3 - D
NOTE:
Does no, include c wr,en,
tee for
Nriung
perm,t or pa,ement
dep0z:cs.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
CO ANrITY
UNIT
UNIT L05T
E AMOUNT
P.C.C. cure - :G" O.F.
24^ gutter 65
L.F.
700
455
P.C.C. curb - 8" C.F.
24" gu¢cer :0,335
L.F.
6.00
62,0:0
P.C.C. curb only
225
L.F.
5.50
1,233
41' P.C.C. sidewalk
12,220
S.F.
1.25
22.225
Oetve approach
650
S.F.
2.50
1.625
8" P.C.'.. s Rutter
tan. curb) 6'1"
S.F.
).40
.o40
Sereer Escavac,on
25.350
C.Y.
1.50
38 .025
A.C.
3,332
TOM
17.00
90.099
Adjust Manhole to grade
I
CA.
250.00
250
Adjust yatyes to
guile 32
EA.
75.00
2,400
Sirce, lights
50
EA.
1000.00
50,000
Barricades
2
EA.
2100.00
4,200
Street si8na
10
EA.
200.00
2.000
18" PCP 120W o)
1,019
L.F.
29.
GO
29.551
2411 RCP, (1500 0)
1,302
L.F.
35.00
45.745
36" RCP '(2000 D)
428
L.F.
49.00
23,422
60" PCP (1200 Of
20
L.F.
85.00
11700
Catch basin N a 4'
1
EA.
2000.00
2,000
Catch basin H _ 7'
4
EA-
2o00.JU
i1,bJ0
Catch basin 4 28'
1
EA.
4500.00
Local depression 41
1
EA.
500.00
SU
Local depression 141
3
EA,
1000.00
3,000
Junaico structure
9
EA.
5000.00
45,000
Ouclec structure, Std
*506 1
EA,
1500.00
11500
Saucut
315
L.F.
2.00
6)0
Catch basin 4 = 14'
3
EA.
3250.00
0,:50
Local depression 7'
4
EA.
520.00
2.080
Local depression 28'
1
EA.
1500.00
11500
33" R.L.P. 0750 0)
405
L.F.
64.00
25,020
P.C.C. ac.enc paving
6,982
S.F.
2.25
15,7:0
Mountain catch basin
3
EA.
2000.00
6,000
Manhole
6
EA.
22W.00
13,200
CONSTRUCTION OUST
CONTINGENCY COSTS 54,553
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 600.078
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SURETY (100 %) 3600.078
LABOR AND MATERIAL SECURITY (50 %) 300.039
ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE
sRESTORATIONIDELINEATION CASH DEPOSIT
(REFUNDABLE)
MONUMENTATION SURETY (CASH)
-Pursuant to City of Rancho Cuca monga Municipal Code, Title 1, Chapter 1.08,
adopting San Bernardino County Code Titles, Chapters 1 -5, a cash r ra icon/
delineation deposit shall be made prior to issurance of an Engineering
Construction Permit.
-6-
T 1
OVA"
0
0
uCA..
Time De-posit Receipt
pcE 0u 13, 1984
12.10-1
1
0
SUBDIVISION
GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE
(SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS)
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government
Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on
the final map of TRACT N0. 12372 are to be set
and furnished by t e su dfvider'S engineer or surveyor on or
before JUNE 30 1986 as specified in the
Engineer's or urveyor'S erti ,cote an agr oes to furnish the
notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified
in Section 66497, of the Government Code.
The undersigned hands you herewith the sum of S 3,850.00
as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee t at tfi—Fe monuments
will be set and the notes furnished as above provided on or
before the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor will
be paid by the undersigned.
It is further understood and agreed that in the event the
undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the
time specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to •
complete said requirements or cause them to be completed and the
cost thereof is to be a charge against said cash deposit, and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to make the necessary
transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city
fund.
It IV further agreed that if the undersigned does not present
evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or
surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if the
engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed in Section
66497 of the Government Code, the City shall pay to said engineer
or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made.
If the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of
the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference
within thirty (30) days after receiving written statement from
the City of Rancho Cucamonga specifying the amount of the
difference between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said
requirements.
Cordially,
H. H. La Band Subdivider
3311 E. Cameron Address
West Covina, CA 91791
Date —July 13, 1984
The depositer of record (for return of any portion of the cash
deposit) shall be
Qa.
ame IAIdres s) •
NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED
qY
rft
RESOLUTION NO. 98'= Et =C?CR 3'a - '.i
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12332-1
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12332 -1 consisting of 53
lots, submitted by Walter H. Laband, Subdivider, located on the east side of
Haven Avenue at the north City Limits has been submitted to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the
Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the
requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the
Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said
City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for
approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets
delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
• approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same
on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is
authorized to attest thereto; and
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good
and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and
content thereof by the City Attorney; and
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon on
behalf of said City.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of August, 1984,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
0 ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
'aa yi
r 1
L-A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 1, 1984 -
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
� CUCAko&
r Z
T
�I
- 1g„
SUBJECT: Approval of Beal Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement
submitted by Randolph and Sandy Davis for property located at 5751
Cabrosa Place
Mr. and Mrs. Randolph Davis have applied for a building permit to construct a
dwelling unit on a lot located at 5751 Cabrosa Place generally located south
of Wilson Avenue and West of Haven Avenue. The property does not front upon
any public street. Access to the lot is provided from Wilson Avenue and an
offer to dedicate public streets fronting the lot has been submitted as
established by City Council Resolution No. 80 -38.
The attached Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement has been
submitted to guarantee the future construction of the street.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and accept the Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien agreement on behalf of the City.
Respectfully sub tted,
LBH: :Jaa
Attachments
y%
0
Z
0
0
�m
i
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY MAP
A
N
page
CABROSA
RECORDING REQUESTED NY:
and
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P. 0. Box $07
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day
of , 19_, by and between Randolph.
S. Davis and Sandy Davis (hereinafter referred t0 as
"Developer-), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a
municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as -City-),
provides as follows:
WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the
• issuance of a building permit for 5751 Cabrosa Place development
the City requires the construction of missing off -site street
improvements including curb, gutter, asphalt pavement and
appurfenant work adjacent to the property to be developed; and
WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction
Of such Improvements until a later date, as determined by the
City; and
WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement
Provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring
the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expense to
the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement
shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements
if the Developer fails or neglects to do so and that the City
shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as
security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment. due
• City,
Yh
NON, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: •
1. The Developer hereby agrees that they will install
off -site street improvements including curb, gutter, asphalt
pavement and appurtenant Mork in accordance and compliance With
all applicable ordinances resolutions, rules and regulations of
the City in effect at the time of the installation. Said
improvements shall be installed upon and along Cabrosa Place and
future Gast /west street located on the northerly side of said
Tot.
2. The installation of said improvements shall be
completed no later than one (1) year following Written notice to
the Developer from the City to commence installation of the
same. Imstallatior of said improvments shall be At no expense to
the City.
D. In the event the Developer shall fail or refuse to •
complete the installation of said Improvements in a timely
manner,. City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the
Developer Written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon
the property hereinafter described and complete said Improvements
and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the
Developer.
4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the
terms and Conditions of this Agreement and to secure the
repayment to City of any funds which may be expended by City In
completing said improvements upon default by the Developer
hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain,
sell and convey to the City, in trust, the following described
real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit:
The Southwest quarter of the North 4 15ths of the East one -haif of •
the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast
quarter of Sectiom 26, township 1 North, Range 7 Nest, San
Bernardino aas4 and Nerldlan, according to Government Survey.
S. This conveyance is in trust for the purposes
described above.
6. Raw, therefore, if the Developer Shall faithfully
perform all of the acts and things to be done under this
Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void, otnerwise, it
shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall
be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and
the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto
shall be governed by the provi Sions of the Ci vi Code of the
State of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining
to mortgages on real property,
7, This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall Inure
to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto.
`J
a. To the extent required to give effect of this
Agreement as a mortgage, the term "Developer- shall be
'mortgagor' and the City shall be the "mortgagee' as those terms
are used in the the Civil Code of the State of California and any
other statute pertaining to mortages on real property.
9. If legal action is commenced t0 enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City
is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to
foreclose the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party
shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable
attorneys fees as shalt be awarded by the Court,
•
A mm -0
0
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Agreement on the day and year first above written.
CITY DEVELOPER
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RANDOLPH S. AND SANDY DAVIS
CALIFORNIA, a municipal
corporationy Tk J %Vjy,,,ja
By. _
Jan rke s
Mayor — ..
ATTEST: 1981
Beverly A. Aothelet
City Clerk
•.. ........... u... r.... • u. a e...... u. •...... u. •...... .......
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO)
On ,19 ,before
me
the undersigned Notary Public, Personally appeared JON 0. MIKELS,
personally known to me to be the Mayor of the CITY OF RANCHO •
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known tp me
to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of
said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such
municipal corporation executed it.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
Notary 9nature
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) as
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO)
On this the Ind day, of JULY 1984 before
me, Rita S. DeLaROSa, Notar Public
the un ers lgne Notary u c personally appears
Sandy Davis
l xxl personally known [o me
( ) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) i,, subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowleged that uh. executed it.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
K,',l, 00"T qL SBAL Anos DFUR05A IOL dry G[MKM1Y v, nru� .ww. fu M. INS
NOTE: WHEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED BY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, •
THE ABOVE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A
CORPORATION /►ARiNEFSA[P-K'CRM6IREDGENENT IS REQUIRED.
/qw" si
0
•
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
On this the 19th day of June, 1987, before me, Barbara Lou
Geraldine_ Brooks, the undersigned Notary Public, personally
appeared Randolph S. Davis, personally known to me to be the
person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged that he executed it.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
..�........ ..gfR.. uµ..1...
ieMI�INWOWY1t IINIB �
trDrow.
li �2 itAi
i «..1.......w......
S1
Notary Signature
RESOLUTION NO. 9803 Q4CR A
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RANDOLPH AND
SANDY DAVIS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGN THE SAME
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted
Resolution No. 80 -38 on May 7, 1980, to establish requirements for landlocked
parcels where no subdivision is occurring; and
`WHEREAS, a single family lot located at 5751 Cabr03a Place is a
Landlocked Parcel within the meaning of said Resolution No. 80 -38; and
WHEREAS, Randolph and Sandy Davis have executed a Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement
Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign
same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of August, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
jaa
53
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
AGRE -MENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
DESIGN AND PREPARATION OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS
AT
ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND SIXTH STREET
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1984
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal orp� oration, hereinafter
referred to as "City ", and Lawrence S. Eisenhart, Consulting Engineer,
with the place of business at 22400 Barton Road, Suite 200, Grand Terrace,
California, 92324, hereinafter referred to as "Engineer'.
WITHESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, City has need for engineering services, consisting of
the preparation of improvement plans, specifications, and estimates for
the traffic signal to be constructed at the intersection of Archibald
Avenue and Sixth Street, hereinafter referred to as "Project ".
• WHEREAS, it is beneficial to City to have under contract an
engineering firm which can immediately perform required services for
City for a predetermined lump sum fee; and,
•
WHEREAS, Engineer desires to perform engineering services for
City under contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it mutually agreed as follows:
I. Engineer, when authorized, shall perform professional civil
engineering services in conjunction with the aforementioned project
as follows:
TASK A. Orientation Meeting with City
1. Review of project scope.
2. Obtain from City:
a. Pertinent design criteria for traffic signal design;
b. Available street improvement plans, topography, utility
information and plan sheets.
5'Y
TASK B. Complete the improvement Plans for the project •
1, Development of a title sheet /detail sheet and a traffic
signal plan at 1 " =20' scale, a bid proposal and technical
specification utilizing the 1984 edition of the Caltrans
Standard Specification. The traffic signal plan shall
include intersection striping, if required. Street im-
provements will not be involved in this project.
2. Preparation of detailed estimates of quantities and can -
struction costs prior to advertising for competitive bids.
3. Plans and technical specifications shall be suitable for
approval by City.
4. Furnish original plans, specifications and bidding forms
to City.
TASK C. Construction Phase Services
Engineer shall be available for consultation during the con-
struction phase and make recommendations on contract change
orders,
II. City shall provide engineer with assistance in the prep-
aration of the plans, specifications and estimates for project by
providing the following:
•
A. Copies of all improvement plans, atlas sheets or other
drawings within project limits as required.
S. Location of all subsurface utility facilities and other
improvements.
C. Plan checking on a no fee basis.
D. City standard sheets if available.
E. City shall prepare the required number of bid documents,
advertise far bids, and perform construction management
and inspection services.
III. City shall reimburse engineer for services performed
a lump sum fee of two thousand dollars ($2,000) for Tasks A and B.
Task C shall be paid on a time and materials oasis at sixty dollars
($60.00) per hour and a mileage rate of twenty -five cents (25c)
per mile.
City shall pay the engineer the prorata share of the fixed fee of
work completea as determined by the City upon billing once each
month at a regular City Council meeting.
•
SS
•
City shall have the right to audit the statement and remove from
payment any item with which City is in disagreement, whicn item
shall be thereafter reviewed with the engineer. After full review,
City shall make the final decision.
Engineer shall begin the work to be performed within five (5) days
after mailing by City to engineer of a .Notice to Proceed and shall
diligently prosecute same and submit plans to City for first plan
check within 30 calendar days thereafter.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Engineer have executed this agreement
as of the date first above written.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Nayor
APPROV:O AS TO FORM
Dart JUL 2 41984
City C erk st
c .c.air,.
RRRC10C9Lb.00:f U,�.gARIA
Lawrence S. Eisenhart, Consulting Engineer
S ro
W
•
!I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
rral
1977
DATE: July 13, 1984
TO: Harry Empey, Director of Finance
FROM: Gary W. Richards, Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF T.O.P. BONDS FOR LIGHTNER DEVELOPMENT
Work for the following tract has been completed and the guarantee
bonds are hereby authorized by the Planning Department for release
to Lightner Development d Contracting, 1365 W. Foothill Boulevard,
Upland, California 91786
Tract No. Lot No. Amount of Receipt No. Purpose/
Cash Deposit Location
10491
1
$2,500
20454 Sales Office /Garage
Conversion on lot
no. 1, tract no.
10491.
10491
1
$ 500
20488 Subdivision sign on
lot 41, Tract No.
10491.
Thank you
for your
assistance; ii
you have any questions regarding
this bond
release,
please call.
GWR /das
S11
•
MEMORANDUM 4 "*�, S
9
0777
DATE: July 24, 1984
TO: Harry Empey, Finance Director
FROM: Gary W. Richards, Code Enforcement Officer*
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF $500 CASH DEPOSIT (SIGN) TO THE JONES
COMPANY
Work for the following tract has been completed and the $500 cash
deposit is /are hereby authorized by the Planning Department for
release to The Jones Company, 10945 South Street, P.O. Box 1178,
Cerritos, California 90701.
S?
AMOUNT OF
PURPOSE/
TRACT NO. LOT NO.
'CASH DEPOSIT
RECEIPT NO.
LOCATION
9305 17
$500
17482
Cash Deposit for
Subdivision Sign
located at 10111
Victoria Street
Thank you for your assistance; if you have
any questions
regarding this
cash deposit release,
please call.
GWR /das
S?
nr,.rtr nc n , %rntrn nrrn a x.rnwrn e
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 1, 1984
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Lisa Nininger, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 1983 -84 BLOCK GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORTS
ABSTRACT: According to HUD guidelines, all recipients of Block Grant
unds are required to submit a Grantee Performance Report (GPR) for the
CDBG funds within sixty (60) days of the end of the fiscal year. Staff
is recommending an amendment to our current contract with Donald A.
Cotton 6 Associates in order to include preparation of the GPR for the
fee of $1,600, to be fully paid for by HUD.
BACKGROUND: The consulting firm of Donald A. Cotton and Associates
A was retained in March 1984 to assist the City in the preparation
of the new Block Grant application for HUD funds. The contract did not
include preparation of two year -end Grantee Performance Reports, which
are required to be submitted to HUD for evaluation of the City's
programs. The process must be completed by August 30, 1984.
Since they are well acquainted with the CDBG process in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, DACA is, extremely qualified to prepare the mandatory
GPR in the required time frame. OACA will prepare the GPR for a
professional services fee not to exceed $1,600, directly reimbursable by
HUD.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council direct staff to
amen the ex sting contract with Donald A. Cotton and Associates to
include the preparation of the Fiscal Year 198344 Grantee Performance
LN:ns
Pi
submitted,
Contract Amendment
Sq
. AMENDMENT
TO THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR
PREPARATION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION,
AND
RELATED TECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
1
This Amendment is effective as of the 1st day of August, 1984, by and
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter collectively referred to as
"CITY" and DONALD A. COTTON ASSOCIATES, INC. (hereinafter referred to as
"DACA ").
2. RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY desires to extend the existing contract with DACA to
include additional professional services related to the Grantee Performance
Reports; and
• WHEREAS, DACA is willing to render such services as hereinafter defined;
NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and DACA agree to amend the existing contract to
include the following services.
`J
3. AGREEMENTS
3.1 Agreements of DACA: DACA agrees as follows:
3.1.1 That DACA will prepare a Grantee Performance Report
for the 1983 -84 Community Development Block Grant
program in the City in accordance with HUD
regulations.
3.1.2 Invoices for services shall be submitted by DACA in
accord with the payment schedule contained in Section
3.3 of the existing agreement.
3.2 Agreements of CITY: CITY agrees as follows:
3.2.1 To pay DACA the sum of $1,600.00 for the performance
of the services described herein.
�j v
4. COUNTERPART EXECUTION •
This agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which so
executed shall be deemed an original irrespective of the date of the
execution, and said counterparts, together shall constitute one and the same
agreement.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: OACA:
Signature Signature
Ti
Tit
i1
U
r 1
LJ
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CIJCAAIO
STAFF REPORT'
ir
O 0
F O Z
DATE: August 1, 1984
1977
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO.
5 TO STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT NOS.
11934, 12044,
12045 AND 12046
Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering
the work in
connection with Annexation No. 5 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1
for the following tracts:
Tract Nos. No. of Street
Lights
(arterial lights)
•
11934 0
12044 0
12045 0
12046 26
The Engineer's Report is also attached for final approval. This
report shows
the estimated costs of the District and includes a location
map for each
tract.
Letters of intent to loin the District have been received from
the developer
of each tract. Letters have been sent to the developers and the
Resolution of
Intent has been placed in the Daily Report Newspaper giving the
time and date
of public hearing.
RBCO149NDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution
ordering
the work in connection with Annexation No. 5 to Street Lighting Maintenance
District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report.
R ttully sU mitted,
V
LBH:Be. i as
Attachments
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• Engineer's Report for
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1
Annexation No. 5
Tracts 11934, 12044, 12045, 12046
SECTION 1. Authority for Report
This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter
1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. General Description
This City Council has elected to
"Av into Street Lighting Maintenance
determined that the street lights to
all lots within said tracts as well
street lights.
annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit
District No. 1. The City Council has
be maintained will have an effect upon
as on the lots directly abutting the
Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district
are:
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on
• arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is
considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost
shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums
with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall
be considered to benefit the same as a lot.
SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications
The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the
developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions
of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering
Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development
plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting
areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the
individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent
as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district
include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of
any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area.
SECTION 4. Estimated Costs
No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction.
All improvements will be constructed by developers. Eased on available data,
it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as
indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be
based on actual coat data.
(0 3
The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 •
(including Annexation No. 5 comprised of 745 lots and 26 9500L street lights
is shown below:
1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy:
Lamp Size* Quantity Rateff
9500L 141 9.90
5800L 95 8.75
*High Pressure Sodium Vapor
Lamps Rate M013 Total
141 X 9.90 X 12 c 16,750.80
95 X 8.75 X 12 = 9,975.00
Total Annual
Maintenance Cost = 26,725.80 _ 7.13 /year /unit
No. of Units
in District 3750
7.13 divided by 12 c .59 /mo. /unit
Assessment
•
shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6.
SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram
Copies Of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and
labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 ^, Annexation No. 5.
These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report.
SECTION 6. Assessment
Improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all
dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each
unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of
assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional
to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel.
It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the
District.
SECTION 7. Order of Events
1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings.
2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's
Report.
3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex to District and sets
•
public hearing date.
Gy
City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and
• determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings.
5. Every year in Hay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council.
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and
approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments.
�VC'
EXHIBIT "A"
Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 5 of Street
Lighting Maintenance District 1:
Tract No of Units /Lots No of Street Lights
11934 123 0
12044 177 0
12045 271 0
12046 174 26
745 26 (9500L)
a
n
LJ
E
•
•
J
�J
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
ANNEXATION NO. 5
title
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � znncR 11e34
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
> ,'s STATE OF CALIFORNIA
61 6
N
tm
LLOYD HUBBS CITY ENGINEER RC 23P.89 DATE Daft __
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
ANNEXATION NO. 5
9/
mummmmmm
MARIGOLD COURT
3
6
LARKSPUR PLACE
99 Im 101:(1` 106 21
103 22
9B ✓45M Co'COGRt 23
BI
A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA title;
�✓ , �} m_ a T 1 OG
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
>i STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Im LLOYD HUBBS. CITY ENGIN R. .23889 DATE Page
0
0
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
AtINEXATION NO. 5
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
ANNEXATION NO. 5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
A
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO , \
'Z STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IM LLOYD MUBBS CITY ENGINEER RCE 27989
N
Da
12046
RESOLUTION NO. -G8- 0T--OTCR '�`/ --�'
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION
NO. 5 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS.
11934, 12044, 12045 AND 12046
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the
5th day of July, 1984, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 84 -196 to order
the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 5 to Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 84 -196
was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by
law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on
file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said
Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement ", was duly and legally
posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as
appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of
the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the
Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property
proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of
• Intention No. 84 -166, according to the names and addresses of such owners as
the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and
manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in
the office of the City Clerk; and
•
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence,
oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and
concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be
derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to
order the proposed work.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the
annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council
hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of
Intention No. 84 -196 be done and made; and
SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally
approved; and
7/
SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the
Engineer's Report are hereby approved.
SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent
of said tracts have been occupied.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this let day of August, 1984.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
jaa
% I
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
•
C,
J
• ORDINANCE NO. 105 -C
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SUBSECTION E AND F OF SECTION 16.32.030 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO PARK AND
RECREATIONAL LAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
Section l: Subsection E of Section 16.32.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
"Credit for Private Open Space"
Where private open space for park and recreational purposes is
provided in a proposed subdivision, and such space is to be privately owned and
maintained by the future residents of the subdivision, such areas may be
credited against not more than fifty percent (50%) of the requirement of
dedication and development for park and recreation purposes, as set forth in
this article, or the payment of fees in lieu thereof, as set forth herein,
provided the Planning Commission finds it is in the public interest to do so,
and that the following standards are met:
• (1) That yards, court areas, setbacks and other open areas required
to be maintained by the zoning and building provisions of this Code shall not
be included in the computation of such private open space; and
(2) That the private ownership and maintenance of the open space is
adequately provided for by written agreement; and
(3) That the use of the private open space is restricted for park and
recreational purposes by recorded covenants which run with the land in favor of
the existing and future owners of property within the subdivision and which
cannot be defeated or eliminated without the consent of the Council; and
(4) That the proposed private open space is reasonably adaptable for
use for park and recreational purposes, taking into consideration such factors
as size, shape, topography, geology, access and location of the private open
space land; and
(5) That facilities proposed for the open space are in substantial
accordance with the provisions of the recreation and parks element of the
general plan for the City and are approved by the Planning Commission; and
(6) That the minimum open apace for which credit will be considered
is three acres and provides a minimum of four of the elements listed below, or
a combination of such, and other recreational improvements that will meet the
• specific recreation park needs of the future residents of the area;
r7 3
Criteria List
A. Children's play apparatus
B. Family barbecue picnic area
C. Game court area
D. Swim pool with adjacent deck and ancilllary facilities
E. Recreation building
The subdivider requestiing consideration for private open space credit
shall, as part of the submittal filing, include:
1. Written request for such consideration by the Planning
Commission; and
2. Submit detailed plans and specifications for areas and
improvements within such proposed private open space.
The Planning Commission shall, as an element of the review for private
open space credit, solicit comments and recommendations from the Park
Development Commission on all such applications.
LI
Section 2: Subsection F of Section 16.32.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga •
Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
"Credit for Private Open Space - Planned Communities"
Where private open space for park and recreational purposes is
provided in a planned community and portions of or all such space is to be
privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the planned community
or publicly dedicated and maintained by a special assessment district, credit
against the requirement of dedication for park and recreational purposes, as
set forth in Section 16.32.020 G shall be determined through the adoption of
the planned community text; provided, however, that the park standard for the
planned community is the same as for any other development and that the
planning commission finds it is in the public interest to do so, and that the
standards for private open space, as set forth in Section 16.32.030 E, are met.
Section 3: All other portions of Ordinance 105 shall remain in full
force and effect.
Section 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage
at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published
in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
CJ
74
ORDINANCE W. d i r
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCRO WCAHWA MUNICIPAL
CODE PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF AMBULANCES.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucasunp, Cmlifarnla, does ordain
u follow,
SECTION 1, The gucho CudAm d,& Mwiclpal Code is hereby mended to road,
as folloks,
"CMpter 1. ubulancee
Definition..
Unless otbarvise stated, cards and terms am defined as fcllOws,
(a) AMBULANCE. The tam 'eabulanem' wane any vehicle
spNoially dedigne, constructed, modified, equipped, &".god,
mintAlned, and operated for the purpose of transporting dick,
injured, wadded, invalid, or espactant ootherd.
(b) AMBULANCE SERVICE OPERATOR. The tam loaWlence Service
operator' Nana Any person who dmpm or operates one or sure
ambulance.
(c) COUNCIL. TM Nn 'Council' means the City COCbcil of the
City of Nevado, Cuamusup.
(d) CLASS OF SERVICE. The ten 'Class of Service' wan' the
level or levels of complexity of field deergway medical services add
+ill he apecifled as basic life support Provided by Evargwcy Medical
Technician (off -IU pereaceal oonforming to California Health And
Safety cam, Section 1760 (t), full advance life support provided by
California licensed physician or by parwadlce and eabilm Intensive
can nursoo amrtifle by the County Health Officer under California
Meslth amd Safety COde, Section 1481.
(a) CITT. The tan 'City' woe the City of Rancho Cucasunp,
California.
(f) CITY MANAGER, The term 'City M&ba"r' assns the City
Manager of the City of Reecho CucaWnp. or his designee.
(g) COMM. The ten 'County' Nana the County of San
Bernardino, California.
(h) COMM REALTR OFFICER. The tan 'County Reaith officer'
mans that person designated as such by the County of Sad Bernardino.
(i) EMERGENCY CALL. IM ten 'Emr6mcy Call' is • m4mst far
the dispatch of en ubulance to transport or provide other assistance
far a "tam who apparently has a sudden or m[ormmen need of
med1c.1 attention.
(d) EMERGENCT SERVICE. The tan 'bargmncy Berlin -' Nara the
fundbloos parramod in nspoNe to An emrgenoy call.
(k) P&TICIrr. The ten 'Patient' mane a sick, Injured,
kowded, invalid, expevtut author, oonvalasoent, or otherviee
iampeottow person.
(1) PENNON. The tan 'Person' LDOludes uy Individual
partaeruip, rift, corporation, association, sovertuental agency or
other group or wablutiob Noting u a wit.
(m) BASIC LIFE SOPPORT MR) AMBULANCI. The tan 'HIS
Wbulanom' meats AN ubul sus Yhlob has equipmet And supplies u
spwifled by Title 13, California Adminlstntive Coda-
7s-
Ordinance No.
Page 2
(n) ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT (ALS) OR LIMITED ADVANCED LIFE •
SUPPORT (LALS) AMBULANCE. The teem 'ALS ar LALS Ambulance' eeans en
ambulance which Me additional equipment and supplies as specified by
the County Health Officer.
(o) MOBILE INTENSIVE CARE (MSC) PARAMEDIC. Me ten 'MIC
Paramedic' mean, a Person specially trained Sn the provision of
emergency cardiac and noncardiac care appropriately certified by the
County Health Officer.
(p) MOBILE INTENSIVE CARE (MIC) NURSE. The ten 'MIC nurse'
means a nurse who has been certified by the County Health Officer ae
qualified in the provision of emergency cardiac and noncardiac care
in the Issuance of emergency Instructions to MIC paramedics.
(q) PERMITTER. The ten 'Peralttee' means any person who
possesses a current City Permit to act as an aabulance service
operator.
(r) CODE 3• The term 'Code 3' meads the period when an
ambulance is traveling to or tram a patient pick -up Point ualng red
light. and /or sirens and is traveling In such • sense, ae to reach
its destination in the shortest Possible time.
"Sec. 4.1.02. Permits; Required.
It shall he unlawful for any person, either as owner, employee
or otherwise, to operate an ambulance, or to engage in business as an
ambulance service operator, upon the streets or any public way or
place in the City except In conformance with A valid City permit to
operate eh abidance service. .
(a) EXCEPTIONS. The equipment and Personnel standards
specified in this chapter apply to all ambulance agencies; however,
the licensing and permit requirements shall not apply for
(1) Publicly owned ambulances{ or,
(2) Vehicles operated as ambulances at the request of
local authorities during any 'state of war emergency,' duly
proclaimed 'state of emergency' or 'local emergeneyl' as defined in
the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 of Division 1 of
Title 2 of the GoVereuent Code), as amended.
"Sec. 4.1.03. Permit Fees.
Permit fees shall be those which are, from time to time, set by
the Council. All permits shall be issued to expire on June 30 of
each year.
"Sec. 4.1.04. Application for a Permit or Renewal of a Permit.
(a) PROCEDURE AND INFORMATIOR REOUIRED. Prerequisites to the
issuenge of a permit or renewal of a permit for an applicant shall
Include the filing with the City Manager an application in writing m
a form to be furnished by the City Manager, which shall provide the
following minim Snformetionr
(1) Name and description of applicant.
(2) Business address and residents address of any
individual applicant. •
(3) The ruse under Mieh the ambulance service will do
business.
76
Ordinance No.
Page 3
•
(b) If a corporation, a ,joint venture, a partnership or
limited partnership, the comes of all partners, or the ewes of
corporate officers, their residence addresses and their percentage of
participation in the business.
(A) A statement of facts to show that the public
coovenSenn and necessity require the issuance of a permit to the
applicant.
(6) A verification that the applicant is equipped to and
w111 provide ALA paramedic service at all times in the City.
(7) A Statement in renewal applications that the applicant
dens or has under his control required equipment to adequately
conduct M ambulance Service in the City, Mich meets the
requirements established by the California Vehicle Code, and that the
applicant coma or has .mesa to Suitable and safe facilities for
maintaining his ubulence Service in a clean and Sanitary
oonsitiw. When an initial application is submitted, a statmnt
that the applicant will Om or w 11 have under his control required
equipment ter adequately conduct on ambulance Service in the City,
uhi0h Nets the requlr cents established by the California Vehicle
Cods and that the applicant will own or will have access to Suitable
and safe facilities for maintaining his ambulance service in a clean
and Sanitary condition. both initial and rmeual applications suet
contain a statement that the applicant will maintain (Station) at
least one ALS equipped ambulance within the gno esphinal boundaries
of the City. Additionally, the applicant must establish to the
reiatooble satisfaction of the City Manager that the applicant has
adequate capability to 'back up` or sutment such ALS equipped
ambulance if it is not immediately ...liable to respond to a call
•
therefor.
(b) A list for renmeal applications amended as required
ute or leased
during veer for any endc Substituted,
each ambulance
vehicles, biting • complete description of uch ambulance Vehicle
,
the internal equipment
carratea the applicant, covering a li uip
the pa
carried by Non ambulance, including the patient capacity Chardob
y
age • espy of EM wet re by
each Inside.
When an initial
Patrol for when initial
LM California ubmh "y Patrol for each
as required
application is submitted, a list, amended as required during the year
for any Substituted, leaned lessee ve giving
e
vehicle to be operated by one
description each a vehicle operated
ccapl6e of each uhe
applicant, "veptlon
covering • llac of CM internal equipment carried by each
into
thereof, and • copy of
ambul including the patient on a
theu
most Ambulance Ice eotcon Report Issued by the California
CM most
trot for he pr ided t r
patrol for each "lance spell io provided co CM City Manager
Vice
prior Le CM stare of ambulance operation.
(9) M affirmation for ronenl applications that each
permitted ambulance and its appurtenances conform to all applicable
provistona of this Ordinance, the California Vehicle Code, the
California Administrative Code and any other State, County or City
applicable directive. When an initial application is submitted, and
affirmation that each permitted ambulance and its appurtenances
conform to all applicable provisions of this chapter, the California
Vehicle Cede, the California Adalnlntrative Code, and any other
State, County or City applicable directive shall he provided to the
City Manager prior to the start of ambulance operations.
(10) A statement for raneeal applications that the
applicant employs sufficient personnel adequately trained add
&"liable to deliver amwMay ALS paramedic ambulance Services, of
tons quality at all times In the City. When an initial application
IS &ubaitten, & statement that the applicant will employ sufficient
persomael adquately trained ens available to deliver emergency ALS
ambulance Service, of good quality, at all times.
77
Ordinance No.
Page 4
(I1) A list for renewal applications giving a description •
of the level of training for each ambulance employee and a copy of
each dertlficate or license issued by the State and County
establishing qualifications of such personnel in ambulance
operations. When An Initial application is submitted, a list,
amended as required during the year for any personnel changes, giving
daserlptim of the level of training for each emulates employ" and
a copy of each certificate or license Issued by the State and County
establishing q"lifi"tions of such persomsl In etulmce operations
shall be provided to the City Manager prior to start of ebuLnce
operation.
(12) A statement, in at initial application, that shows to
the satisfaction of the City Manager that the issuance of a Permit Ss
in the public Interest And there is A Owed for • permit to he Issued,
in that then is a requirement for ebulama service Mich can be
legally serviced by the applicant.
(19) m atatWaat sign" by the applicant that as a
Condition of the City issuing a permit, applicant gream to appear
and dafmd all actions against the City arising out of the exercise
of aid permit, teed $bell 1"mify and save the City, its offioera
and employees, and agents harmless of ad from all claims, demda,
actions, or cause of actims of every a1M and description resulting
directly of indirectly, arising out of, or in my way connected with
the exercise of this permit.
"Sic. 4.1.05. Tnvestigation by City Manager.
Upon receipt of a completed Initial (non - renewal) mpllcatimn
the City Manager mall Conduct m investigation to determine if the •
public heslth, safety, welfare, Convenience and necessity require to
granting of a permit for which the application Mm ham made sad
stall further determine if the applicant meets all mqulrements of
this Ordisance. The investigation on all non - renewal applicetiona
shall requirm the City Manager to conduct a public hearing an such
need and upon the qual fictions of the applicant. Upon completion
of his investigation, the City Mahager mall mceeend to the Council
that a permit ne granted or denied. NO permit shall be issued by the
City Namger until the Council Mm determined that the public health,
safety, welfare, convenience and necessity require the granting of
such permit. The determination of the Council shall be by mean. of
its conduct of a public hearing upon such need and the qualifioatione
of the applicant.
"Sac. 4.1.06. issuance or venial of Permit.
The City Council my order the issuance of a new permit te
conduct an ealence aenvlce in the City upon finding that the public
health, safety, welfare, convenience and necessity require the
availability of each enlace service and that the applicant Wall
all mquirmsenta of this Ordinance.
(a) The Council may order the denial of a permit on the ground
of infeasibility. Menever a new application is filed under the
provisions of this ordlm" for a permit to provide Ambulance
service in the City, the Counall, after due investigation, Amy find
and determine, as a Uttar of fast, that there dews art exist
sufficient potential no" for amalan" service te duatity the
granting of an additioual separate and distinct permit for "a within
the City. predicated on Such findings, the Cowell W deny the
application for permit an the grounds that the granting of such new
permit is not In the public interest and welfare.
(b) The Council my order the denial or am -rmOml of a permit
if the applicant or my partner, officer or director thereat,
78
Ordinance No.
page 5
• (1) Was previously the holder of a City perait, which
psrait was revoked or auspmded and the term or conditions of the
suspension nova not been fulfilled or corrected.
(2) Is coamitting any act, which, If coa•itted by any
"r tta, would be grounds for the awWat., or revocation of a
Pareit issued pursuant to this Ordinance.
(3) Has o0aaltted any act involving d13h..OSty, ffmd, or
deceit whereby another is injured or where the applicant has
benefited.
(4) gas acted as an ambulmce service operator fn the City
without possessing a valid yereit therefor.
(51 Ms aided or abetted soy Para.. to violate my
provision of this chapter or any prior smulence ordinance.
(6) Makes any false or nialeading atateavvt upon any
application, or during the course of any investigation, required or
paralttad by this chapter.
(o) BONDTMO OF APPLICANT. Before any permit 33 iaued Mder
the provisions of this Ordinance, the Council Shall require the
applicant m a condition to the Issuance of the permit to post with
the City Clark a cash Mond In the au• of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars
025,000.00) or a surety bond in the sus mount furnished by a
wrpomtlon authorized to do business in the State of Callfomla,
payable to tM City. The bond shall be conditioned upon the full and
faithful perforaYlce by the pereitta of his obligations under the
applicable provisions of this Ordinance and aMll be kept in full
• force and effect by the pereittee throughout the life of the "mit
and all renegls thereof.
(d) LIABILITY INSURANCE. The permittee Shell obtain and keep
in force during the tare of said parait public liability and bodily
Insurance LSOU44 by a uaapany authorised to do business In the State
of California insuring the owner, and also casing the City m an
additional insured of such ambulance against 1033 by reason of Injury
or damages that say result to persons or property fro negligent
operation or defective construction of such ambulance, or from
violation of this Ordinance or of my ether law of the State of
California or of the United States. Said policy shall be in the me
of not leas than Four Killion Dollars (14,000,000.00) for personal
injury to or death of any one person in my single accident; and the
limits of earth such vehicle SM11 not M leas then Pow Million
Dollars ($4,000,000.00) for daaegas to or destruction of property in
any own accident. Wcrkera' Compeneation insurance shall be carried
covering all Mplo"03 of the peratttee. Copies of the policies or
oartlfates vidmain, such policies atoll be filed with the City
Clerk. All Pa1lc1ga shall contain a provision requiring a thirty
(30) ay notice to be given to the City Clerk prior to cancellation,
modification or raduction of limits.
0
"Sac. 4.1.07. Content of Permit.
The perSlt Shall apocify the dates of issuance and of
expiration, the mater of amulmce units to be us" by the perafttes
and my special conditions regarding ooamMiatfons, equipamt and
personnel deemed appropriate by the City Munger.
7�
Ordinance ho.
Page 6
^San. 4.1.08. Aaeodmmt of P.ralt.. •
Upon r"mat by the peralttae, the City tanager nay ,send the
conditions Specified in a Penh it he finds such requested changes
to M in substantial CCapllmce with the provisions of this
ordlpauca. Such ma ndesnt still not affect the expiration date of
the exl,tieg ISreit, nor shall it authorise a change in ownership
from that specified in the original permit.
"San. 4.1.09. Renewal of Pernits.
Paraits shall be renewed annually by the City Manager upon
application of the paratttea, if the beret holder proposes an
substantial Chang* In the Contact of the parait, and if the City
Manager determines that the berm holder has, during the period of
the expiring perdit, operated in substantial coeforaity with the
provisions of this ordinance and the rules and regulations of the
City, and that a is capable Of Continuing operation to conformity
with the rule, and regulation, of the City.
(a) Unless good cause Can be shown by the peraittee, it !hull
be a valid Dols for env -ranesal of • petit if the permittae has
ant, during the preceding parait period, had a Code 3 response ties
to At lust 9S% of its eesrgendy calla of eight (8) minutes or
leas. Said response time being mmured from the ties the pereittes
recelved the request until the penitt" -a mbulmbe actually amlred
at the lonatlon for which the service wu requested.
"Sao. 4.1.10. Suspension snd gavocatice of Parana.
The City Mensg*r shall be espower d to suspend or revoke the •
perelt issued under the provisions of this Ordinance to Oberst. an
ambulance service, Man it has been found attar investigation that
the persittu or my partner, officer, or director;
(a) Violates any section of this chapter or my rules or
ngulatlC60 that are promulgated by the City which relate to his
pardt activitles.
(b) Is convicted of my offense relating to the use, sale,
poaaessim, or transportation of narcotics or habit tuning drugs.
(0) CoesSts my act involving dishonesty, fraud, or deceit
whereby another is injured, Or whrreby the penittee has benefited,
or my act'Snvolving noral turpitude,
(d) Has atarepnlmted a material fact in obtaining a permit,
or is m longer adhering to the Conditions specified in his
appl3Cation.
(e) Aids of abate my person who violatea the provisions of
this chapter.
(f) pails m Am. and keep records showing his transacttn60 as
a peraittee, or tails to have auoh records available for Inspection
by the City Munger or his only authorised reprmentati a for a
Period Of not 1608 than three years after enpletlon of my
transaction to which the record, refer, or refuses to comply with a
Witt" request of the City Manager or mks such record Aullable for
inspection.
(g) AaCapts an energemy, Call when either unable or unwilling
to Provide the requ60ted Service or tails to infon the person •
requesting such SMViCa Of My delay and falls to obtain the oansmt
of such person before Causing ae ubulmce to respond Ira a location
anon dialect then the One to wbloh the request me directed,
NE
ordiemce go.
page 7
• (h) Failure, without adequate Justification, to continuously
provide HIC paramedic eaargescy service for a continuous period of
w,. than 24 hours.
(1) Fails to notify the Fin Dapartaant of a request for
emergmcy aalarce service,
(J) Opentm an smulance demoted as a paramedic unit by
wording or lettering on the unit without gnallfl,d MIL personnel and
equlparnt in the 'chick.
(k) During my validation period of not leas than thirty (30)
days, failure of percittee to respond to 95% of Cod, 3 calla within
eight (g) minute or 1033 will be sufficient grounds for nvowtlon
of peralt.
^Sac. 4.1.11. Swpewlon, Conditional Operation, and Tampovery
PariR
In the asset of a change in ownership of my kind or nature my
interruption of service of anon than twenty -four (24) aura duration,
or my substantial change In staffing Or equipamt Of the SmUlmce
service, which causes the asbulmc, service to be carried out
differently than specified in the current operating permit, the
pereittea shall notify the City Mawgar ir•adietaly in writing,
stating the facts of such change.
(&) Upon request by the gnittea, the City M Ager nay grant a
temporary Variance in writing from the condition specified in the
oeiglnal peralt if he finds that such change Is in substantial
• cwpltanw with the provisions of this Ordinance. If the City
Manager finds that such change I. not in substantial ocmplimcs with
this Ordinannce, be may awpend, revoke, or nand the permit by
written notics. In all mans when a change of Ownership Occurs In an
ambulance service, an application for a new percit shall be filed
with the City haneger within thirty (30) days. In he case shall my
t6"rwy variance be valid for acre than slaty (60) days without
written approval or the Council.
F
-Sen. 4.1.12, appMI procedure.
If the renwal of a permit is denied by the City Manager or if
the City Manager suspends Or revoked a pereit, the persit,e shall be
given wrlttm notice specifying not Only the action taken, but in the
event or a suspension or revocation, the effective dates thereof.
Such notification shall be by registered or certified call.
(a) the persittse mall thereupon be entitled to a hearing
before the City Manager. no p,,-Mttee atoll he afforded a hearing
prior to the effective data Of any denial, suspension or
revocation. The City Meager coy, after such Mining, affirm,
modify, or set aside the original decision.
(b) If, after the hearing provided for above, the City Manager
denies the rmwal of or swpends or revokes a peRit, the peraitt"
shall Mss the right to demand a hearing by LM COwofl. A request
for a bearing shall be aside in writing to the City Clark within
fifteen (15) colander dap following the denial, swpeMion,
revocation Or non.renwal of the permit. Upon receipt Of a written
request, the City Clark shall set the rtter for hearing on a date
el
Ordlnmce No.
Page g
not son then sixty (60) "" following receipt of the written •
request and glue notice to the appellant, the City Manager, and any
other interested persona who My present evidence, relevwnt to the
decision of the City Manager. Within thirty (30) days following the
conclusion of the hearing, the Council mall sake findings and issue
its, order, whether or not the perslt sauld be issued or the
suspension or revocation sustains.
(c) During the ties available to request an appeal, and at any
tine before the appeal to the Council shall have blames final, the
effect of mob own- meawal, se Paxton or revocation shall he stayed.
(d) Notwithatandia any other provisions herein contained to
the contrary, the City Manager mall be espovems to affect an
ie•ediate suspension of a pareit without delaying the effective date
thereof If M first finds the continued conduct of such peraittee 13
an far resoved fra coepilence with this Ordinance or the general
welfare of the citizen of the City an to Justify such ivaeadiate
action.
(a) Any perelttee who as such Iesediate suspm.ion action
akm against it shall hays a hearing scheduled before the City
Manager within seven (7) working days of such suspension.
"Sec. 4.1.13• Beer Nancy Service Nequlresenta.
Each persittes call prowls. sawrgmny MIC paramdic ambulance
sarvice on a continuous twenty -tour (24) houra per day hesta.
-Sec. 40.14. Conf..m with Pemit Ordinance. •
No esbulance operator shall provide ambulance service for
abulance calls originating within the City unless he shall first
have a valid City permit.
-Sec. 4.1.15. Standards for Dispatch.
Emb mubulance service receiving an emergency ambulance request
shall dispatch an mbulmce in ampliance with the procedures
identified in Title 13, California Adainlstrative Code. If an
aebulance is not available for Sesediate dispatch, the procedures
identified in Title 13, California Administrative Code, shall he
compiled with.
(a) The Fire Department shall be SeseAtately notified of my
m.rgenay Ybulmom request.
-Sec. 4.1.16. Ambulance Safety and ENrgency Equipe.nt
muireesmb.
Ambulances, shall be sainained at all time in good esohanioal
repair and in a clean and smite" condition.
(a) MINIMUM EQUIPMENT. All esbulances shall be equipped with
all safety and emergency equipesnt required for ambulance by the
California Vehicle Code and the Californla Assintatmtiwe Code and
adalnlstoati,e rules of the County Meath officer as the saes are am
writtmv or hereafter aamded.
(b) ALT AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT. In addition to the regular
obulance aqulpYat as supplLes, any ALS Ambulande shall also he •
equipped u required by the valid administrative rules of the County
E.olth Officer.
R.&
ordinance No.
Page 9
• (c) MAINTENANCE OF EMENGENCT EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES.
breedings, bandaging, Icetnaents and other wdi"1 supplies used for
care and trea"wht of patients uill he protected so they are Sterile
Aso ready for "e.
"See. 4.1.17. Aanulanp Persoanel.
Eery person rho drives an "balance rithln the City, chile
responding to Mer6eney calls, shell comply with the requlreaenES in
the California Administrative Code for "enlace drivers. The driver
of an aawlance shall ba trained and aMpetent in the proper use of
all Margency p Ipant required by this ordinance. The driver shall
also hold a certificate of at least an Off-IA noises the sabulance
service operator h" Even Specifically eaMpted free this requlreaent
by the Conoil.
(a) AMUNCE ATTENDANT. An asbulance attendant shall ba
trained and competent In the proper use of all ewrgency squipeent
required by this Ordinance, and Shall hold the rvquirsd certification
of at least an Off -1A. If the vehisla Ss Wing wed a " ALS
sahelanom, at least 0ne attendant shall held a "rtlylnate as So MIC
perasedic issued by the Health officer for ALS sabulonce.
(b) ATTENDANT NEQOINED. Each sabulance being operated v1 "in
the City, in response to an margeney cell, shall he staffed by both
a driver and attendant. Teas attendant of an Moulanse rospnding to
an, emergency call Shall onsupy, the patient coapartwnt while
transporting any Arson In apparent need of wdlsol attention.
An Mbulance driver or asEUlance attendant vhe is a California
• It.*" physician or an MIC nurse certified by the County Health
Offiosrp shall he except true the ea haw sedical training
requirement Of this aaction.
This avetion Shall trot apply during any 'state of MergenM' or
'local ewrgsney' " defined in the Goverment Code of the Ste" of
California.
"Sec. 4.1.18. Continuation of Call.
An mb l.. based and properly licensed outside the City but
not licensed by the City shall he authorised to transport a patient
to or through the City, but shall cwt he authorized to transport
patients originating in the City.
IS.. 4.1.19, Emergency and Disaster Operations.
During any 'state of rer eaergenoy.' 'state of 4Mer6noy,' or
'local a deny' as deficad in the California Ewrgensy Sertioas Act
(Chapter 7 of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Governeanb Code), "
""dodo each asbulance service operator shall provide equlpeentp
fac111tiesp and personnel " required by the City Manager.
1940. 4.1.20. User Conplaint procedures.
Any over or subscriber to an asbulance service eootnding that
he hex base mquired to pay an excessive charge for service or that
he hex received unsatisfactory services "y file a written cosplafnt
with the City Manager setting forth own alleptio". The city
Manager shall notify the affected permittee of won complaint, and
xM11 investigate the hatter " datermina CM validity of the
oomplaint. If the oeeplaint is deteraimd to be validp the City
Manager Shall take a reasaable and proper *oil= to Secure
cogpliance with the canditins of this Ordlnaaw.
g3
Ordinance No.
Page 10
-S.. 4.1.21. Worneaent Responsibilities. •
(a) The City Manager shall Sake all necessary and reasonable
rule and regulations subject to the approval of the Council onveriaS
abidance service apmati.., anbulanca equt mat, asbulance vehicles,
aabulance personnel, and for the effective and raaeomble
adai nistration of this Ordinance.
(b) the City Manager Shall inspect the records, facilities,
vehicles, e0ulpmnt and setbods of operation uteMetr such
Inspections w deeded necessary.
"Sec. 4.1.22. Excused Perforoanoe.
No operator shall SO deeaad to he in violation of Its perch if
it Shall fall to provide, either In uhola or an part, the sereien
.there[.. required of it If Such perfornence is prevmtod by any of
the folloving,
(a) Acts of Cod(
(b) Labor strikes or disputes)
(c) Intervention of any governamt body, or
(d) My Come rwombly beyond the control of the operator.
SECTION 2: The City council hereby deolar.. that it would haves adopted
thisos and each section, Suheection, sentence, .lawns, phrase or
portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or we seutloa,
Subsections, Sentences, clauses, phrases on P0rtl0a thereof he M01"
invalid or usconstltutulmul. If for any reasons my portion of this
Ordinance shall he declared Invalid Or unconstitutional, than all Other •
provisions thereof Shull remin in full force and affect.
SECTION 32 The ftyor Shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk Shall
ettat to the aaae, and the City Clark Shall "MO the Ordinance t0 be
published vIthln fifteen (19) days after its passage, at least once In The
Daily Ropoft, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of
tar o, Sun circulated In the City of Poncho Cucuonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of 1984.
ALES:
NOES:
ABSENT.,
ATTEST:
Jon D. Hikela, Hayor
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
91
•
• M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager
FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney
DATE: November 1, 1983
RE: Ambulance Ordinance
The sample Ambulance Ordinance which you sent to me for
review, under your cover memo of October 24, 1983, is in most
respects identical to the one adopted by the City of Ontario on
December 7, 1982. I am enclosing a copy of Ontario's Ordinance
for your review and comparison.
The most significant difference between Ontario's Ordinance
• and the sample submitted by the ambulance operators is at Section
4 -1.18 of Ontario's Ordinance which allows the City Council to
regulate maximum rates that a permitee may charge. No comparable
provision appears in the sample ordinance.
Also, the Ontario Ordinance does not have an equivalent of
the sample Ordinance's Section 4 -1.22 "Excused Performance ". I do
not recommend inclusion of a section such as proposed Section 4 -1.22.
It is overbroad.
I have no difficulty with the first two of the three added
items. These are essentially policy matters. On the addition
subsection (k) to Section 4 -1.10, there should be some clarifica-
tion as to what is meant by "validation period" as used in that
subsection.
The proposed ordinance would give the City Council the
right to restrict the number of ambulance operators in the City on
¢9_q
a "public convenience and necessity" basis. Such ordinances
commonly provide for some form of rate regulation in order to •
protect the public from the possibility of overcharge due to a
lack of available alternative service providers.
RED: sjo
Enclosure
$4-Q
•
•
A
•
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 1, 1984
TO: Members of City Council and City Manager
FROM: Mark Lorimer, Administrative Analyst'I
SUBJECT: URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 148
For consideration the City Attorney has prepared the attached Urgency
Ordinance No. 148 -A which, if adopted, mould eliminate Section 2
(termination) of the City's existing Mobile Nome Park Meet and Confer
Ordinance No. 148. Upon amendment of such section, Ordinance No. 148
would continue in full force and effect until further Council action on
the ordinance is taken.
Staff recommends adoption of the attached Ordinance No. 148 -A.
ML /kep
8s
137
SUBJECT: URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 148
For consideration the City Attorney has prepared the attached Urgency
Ordinance No. 148 -A which, if adopted, mould eliminate Section 2
(termination) of the City's existing Mobile Nome Park Meet and Confer
Ordinance No. 148. Upon amendment of such section, Ordinance No. 148
would continue in full force and effect until further Council action on
the ordinance is taken.
Staff recommends adoption of the attached Ordinance No. 148 -A.
ML /kep
8s
• ORDINANCE NO. 148 -A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 148 BY REPEALING SECTION 2 THEREOF
PERTAINING TO TERMINATION OF CHAPTER 8.10 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "MOBILE HOME PARE RENT
MEDIATION', AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Ordinance No. 148 which was approved and adopted on August
5, 1981 is hereby amended by repealing Section 2 thereof. Section 2, which is
repealed by this Ordinance, reads as follows:
"Termination; Unless extended by action of the City
Council, this Ordinance shall terminate and have no force
and effect three (1) years after adoption."
SECTION 2: Unless this Ordinance is adopted as an urgency measure,
Ordinance No. 148 will expire by its own terms on August 5, 1984, thereby
removing from law a procedure designed to resolve rent increase disputes
between the tenants and owners of mobile home parks before an alternate
• procedure can be considered by the City Council. The City Council finds that
it is in the best interests of the public health, safety and welfare to extend
the provisions of Ordinance No. 148 indefinitely while alternatives thereto are
being considered by the City Council.
SECTION 3: This Ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency
measure, and it shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage
at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published
in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1984.
r 1
86
r]
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 1, 1984
TO: City Council ,
I.
FROM: Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Individuals
to Write Arguments for City Measure
On July 5, the City Council approved to place Measures on the November
Statewide ballot regarding whether the position of Mayor should be elected and
whether the Mayor's terms of office should be for two years or four years.
For BmamYc consideration, is a Resolution authorizing the individua ;e who may
file a written argument for and /or against the city measures. / Only one
argument for and one argument against can be authorized. Under Elections Code
Section 5016, the City Clerk is given guidelines for selecting the arguments
should more than one argument be submitted. Also included for consideration is
authorization for the City Attorney to write an impartial analysis of the
Measures.
Council has passed Resolution No 79 -110 which includes a provision for allowing
rebuttal arguments not to exceed 250 words. This Resolution is In effect until
repealed by the City Council. (Per Section 5014.5 of the Elections Code).
The Registrar of Voters has selected the deadlines of August 14th for written
arguments and August 21st for rebuttals.
be
attach: Proposed Resolution
Resolution No. 79 -110
Election Code Sections 5010 -5025
W
RESOLUTION 10. 79 -110
. A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES
FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED
TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS THEREOF FOR THE Ni7N ICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE NEU IN SAID CITY ON T17ESDAY. THE SIN DAY
OF APRIL, 1900.
WHEREAS, Section 10012 of the Elections Code of the Scare o.
California authorizes the governing body of any local agency to adopt
regulations pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a
municipal election, including costs thereof; and
NHEREAS, it is the optnion of Ch. Attorney General of Cu
State of California(No. M 7615, y. , 6, 1976) that A candidate may n
r
be billed for the additional cost of preparing candidates' statements in
Spanish if ..ch were nor requested by the candidate but were rep of tad
solely by reason of recent a endments to the Federal Voting giants Act
of 1965 (Public Lau 91-71, August 6. 1975);
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Ranehn '.:.monad.
Calif ... la, does herehy resolve, declare, determine and order t. w..
0
SECTION 1: That each candidate ttapg A candidate', state -
manc shall, at the time of filing said staces. "t, C v a depnste It
5175.00 to offset the escimaced costs :f prinrtng and handling the
candidate's statements. Funds collected in excoss It actual oronced
costs shall be refunded within 10 days after the certification the
municipal election by the City Clerk. If the actual P ocated
exceed 5175.00 per candtdace, each candidate shall par that :a' .tea's
share of the balance within )0 days ac CeC notif;aatton by tFv Ctiy
Clerk.
SECTION : That in accordance with Slettan �1015.i and
50;:.5 of the Elections Code of the State of California, the City Council
�f the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby deurmines chat rebuttal argunencs
c exceeding 259 words may be submitted for each measure which will
appear an the municipal ballot.
SECTION 5: not in compliance with the recent amendnenca
to the Federal Voting Rights Ace of 1965 (Public Law 9s -77, Anguu 6,
1975) the City Clerk shall provide a Spanish translation of rte candtdace 'i
9%
EFCTSO^ L '.hat in accordance with Section ]_gc7 :t c
Election. Code of t e Srace of Calitocala, the Clcv Council of ! e City
of Rane'na Cuc oolongs hereby de[erm tees that each candidate for Tanta pal
affix shall at the time of filing, pay A fee of 523.00 co cover a »n
ai proI..ing nomination papers.
SECTION ] That pursuant to Section 30011 f the Electlons
Cade of the 51ate of California. each candidate for e a e t,
be voted for at the Municipal Elec Cton co be held In In, CVC. If
•
Cucamonga on the Bch day of April, 1980, may prepare a sand t!are's
statement on an appropriate form provided by Che Cic: Clcrs. Such
stdcyment may fnclude the name, age, and o c.p.t,.h of the card,dacc and
a brief description of no more than two hundred (200) words a f the
candidate's education and qualifications expressed by the candidate
him.. }f. Such statement shall not include .arty affiliation If the
candidate. nor membeeehip or activity in partisan Colllical n r h on catis.
Such statement shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk at the
time the candidate's nomination napers are filed. Such +tatenene 1.11 be
withdrawnt but not changed, during the ;.erind t'.:r '.[ling naminatlIc
papers and until 5:00 p.m, of the next working day after the c!Ise a.
the nomination Perini.
0
SECTION 1: That each candidate ttapg A candidate', state -
manc shall, at the time of filing said staces. "t, C v a depnste It
5175.00 to offset the escimaced costs :f prinrtng and handling the
candidate's statements. Funds collected in excoss It actual oronced
costs shall be refunded within 10 days after the certification the
municipal election by the City Clerk. If the actual P ocated
exceed 5175.00 per candtdace, each candidate shall par that :a' .tea's
share of the balance within )0 days ac CeC notif;aatton by tFv Ctiy
Clerk.
SECTION : That in accordance with Slettan �1015.i and
50;:.5 of the Elections Code of the State of California, the City Council
�f the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby deurmines chat rebuttal argunencs
c exceeding 259 words may be submitted for each measure which will
appear an the municipal ballot.
SECTION 5: not in compliance with the recent amendnenca
to the Federal Voting Rights Ace of 1965 (Public Law 9s -77, Anguu 6,
1975) the City Clerk shall provide a Spanish translation of rte candtdace 'i
9%
aracemenc to be included in the Voter's Pamphlet which contains the •
statement of each candidate in EnBi lah and Spanish, pursuant to :ay.
SECTION That the City Clerk shall oroyide each candidate
or the candidate's represencatiya A copy of this Nesatucrnn at the time
nominating petitions are issued.
SECTION g; That the Cib+ Clerk ahall certtfy to the passage
and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the ^ a to the book of
original Resolutions of said City; and shall nake a n nute f passage
and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City
Council of said Clay, in the minute, of the meeting at which the same is
,eased and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19tn day of December, 1979
AYES: Schlosser, Bridge, Palombo, Mike l s, Frost
.DES: Vone
ABSENT: Inns
Mayo
ATTEST:
e^ •at,
M
W
•
4M. 111 CTIONS CODF
4411111. Examinallon al pellllon.
After the Petition has been filed, the clerk shall examine the petition in the
same manner as are county petitions in accordance with Sections 3707 and 3708,
except that, for the purposes of this section. references in those Sections lA the
board of supervisors shall be treated as references to the legislative bady of the
city or city and county. The expenses of signature verification shall be provided
by the governing body receiving the petition foam the clerk.
(Added by.8/ats. 1981. c. 138 .d 11.)
Hot Preservation and destruction of petition.
The Petition shall be preserved and destroyed In accordance with the
provisions of Section 3756.
(Added by SIB& 1981, c. 136, ¢12.)
HH. Petitions pal accepted.
Petitions which do not substantially conform to the form requirements of this
article shall not be accepted for filing by the clerk.
(Added by Slap 1981. C. 136. ,p13.)
Article 4. Arguments Concerning City Measures
5414. "Clly measure' definition.
S As used in Ions article. "city measure" includes any proposed city charter, any
Proposed amendment to a city charter, any proposition for the issuance of bonds
by the city, any advisory question. or any Other question or proPoslllon Submitted
to the voters of a city.
(Amended by Sats. 1976, C. 916. ,4'2.)
Sql. City attorney le Prepare Impartial analysts.
Whenever any city measure gmlffia for a place on The ballot the governing
body may direct the city clerk To transmit a copy of The measure to the city
attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the office of the City attorney are
affected. The city attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure
showing the effect of the measure on the existing taw and the operation of the
mtavure. If the in affects the organization or salaries of the office of the
city attorney, the governing board may direct the city clerk to prepare the
Impartial analysis. The analysts shall be printed preceding the arguments for and
agalat the measure. The analysis shall not exceed 5110 words in length.
(Added by Staffs. 1976, C. 118, §3)
Still 11 oat algerwlw Provided, voters may submit arguments.
If there is no other method provided by general law, ur, to the case of a
chartered city, by the charier or by city ordinance. arguments for and against any
city measure may be submitted to The qualified voters of the city pursuant to this
article. If a method is otherwise provided by general law, or, in the case of a
Chartered city, by charter or city ordinance. for submitting arguments as to a
Particular kind of city measure. that method shall control.
(Added AYStfits. 1978, r 248, 13.)
R)
E t(CTIONS CODE 5114A
5417. Written argameSM
The legislative body, or any member or members of me legislative body
authorised by that body, or any individual voter who is elliptic la vote on the
measure, or bona fide associalion of citizens, or any commmllm Of voters and
as oclaaom, may file a written argument for or against any city etwe tire. No
argument shall exceed 300 words in length. The city clerk shall muse an argument
for and an argument against the measure to he Printed along with me following
statement on the front coven or if Anne, on the heading of the first page, of the
printed arguments;
"Arguments in support or opposhion of the proposed Incas arc the opinions of
the aulhors."
The city clerk shall enclose a printed COPY of both arguments with each sample
ballot; provided, that only those arguments filed pursuant to this section wall be
printed and enclosed with the sample ballot. The Printed arguments are "official
matter" within the meaning of those words used in Section 10010.
Printed arguments submitted to voters in accordance with Ibis section snail be
titled either "Argument In Favor Of Measure _ " or " Argumeot Against
Measure _— _ -- _ ," accordingly, the blank spaces being filled in only with the
. letter or number. If any, which despgMws the measure. At the discretion of the
clerk. the word "Proposition" may be subslplutd for the word "Meagre" in such
titles. Words used In the title shalt not be Counted when determining the length
Of any argument.
(Amended by Staffs. 1983 c. 812 06.5.)
$414. Argameal nal accepted wllluat mmea
A ballot argument shall not be accepted under (his article unless accompanid
by the name or homes of the Person or persons submitting it. or, if submitted on
behalf of an organization, the name of the orgatinnu m and the come of in Wait
one of Its principal officers.
No more than five sigmlurashall appear with any argument Submitted under
this ankle. In caw any argument is signed by more than live Persops the
Sigm(ures of the first five shall be printed.
(Added by SISM 1976, C. 248. 531
5414.1. Argument Sol accepted wltlom consent from pence IaelaaN m
W.I.
A ballot argument or, if applicable, a rebuttal argument which Includes in its
text the name of a person, other than the a,that of the argument, who is
reprewnled as being for or against a meagre, shall not he accepted unless the
Camara, of Such tomenl of
argument Is accompanied by a signed Ca a
Person. other than an individual, shall be signed by an officer or other duly
authorized reprewnand", "Person" as used 'a this section mesa any individual,
Partnership. corporation. Bwarialion, commal". labor orpolzeiton, and
any
other orpniauon or group of persons.
(Added by Stets. 1978. C. 172 U)
51114.14 Rebaual arguments
(a) 11 Bay person submits an argument against a city meBSAle.and an argument
has been filed in favor of the city measure, the clerk shall immedialely wad
copies of that argument to the persons filing the argamenl in favor of the city
meagre The persons filing the argument in favor of the city tip
Prepare and Submit a rebulal argument not exceeding 250 wo Ire Clerk shall
ME 11 I Cl IONS COOF •
4"1. Examination of petition.
After the petition has been filed, the clerk shall examine the petition In the
same manner as are county petitions in accordance with Sections 3707 and 7708,
except that, for the purposes of this section, references in those sections to the
board of supervisors shall be treated as references to the legislative body of the
city or city and county. The expenses of signature verification shall be provided
by the governing body receiving the Petition from the clerk.
(Added by Slats 1981, a 136, §11.)
/US. Pre"rvatlon and destruction al petition.
The Petition shall be preserved and destroyed in accordance with the
provisions of Section 3756.
(Added by S1e19. 1981, C. 136, 1121
4U7. Petitions not accepted.
Pei illons which do not subslant is fly conform to the form requirements Of this
article shall not be accepted for filing by the clerk.
(Added by Slats. 1981. C. 136, §13.)
Article e. Arguments Concerning City Measures
UIa. •City measure' definition.
As used inthis article, "city measure" includes any proposed city charter, any
p proposed amendment to a city charter, any proposition for the issuance of bonds
by the CRY, any advisory question, or any other question or proposition Sul mftled
to the voters of a city.
(Amended by Slats., 1976, C. 91f §Z.)
Ull. City attorney to prepare impartial analy5iL
Whenever any city measure qualities far a place an the ballot, the governing
body may direct the city clerk to Imusmlt a copy of the measure to the city
attorney, unless the organization orsalarie; of the office of the city attorney are
affected. The city attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure
showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation of the
measure. If the measure affects the organirion or salaries of the office of the
city attorney, the governing board may direct the city clerk to prepare the
Impartial analysis. The analysis shall be printed preceding the arguments for and
against the measure. The analysis shall not exceed 500 words in length.
(Added by Slats. 1976, C. 248, §'3.)
5017. 11 not otherwise provided, voters may submit arguments.
If there Is no other method provided by general law, or, in the case of a
chartered city. by the charter or by city ordinance , arguments for and against any
City measure may be submitted to the qualified voters of the city pursuant to Ibis
article. If a method is otherwise provided by general law, or. in the case of a
Chartered city, by charter or city ordinance, for submitting arguments as to a
Particular kind of city measure. that method shall control.
(Added by Slats 1976. C. 13.)
•
ELECTIONS COOF 5014".
5515. written arguments,
The legisapve body. or MY member or members of the IeglamiI body
smaorlred by the# body or any individual voter who Is ellgibte to vote an the
measure, or boon fide association of et' m or any C*Ugg=tioa of anima it
association& may the a written WgM,M, for or aping any city ttteamm. No
argumeatSMIl exceed 3tl0wordafn length. The city clerashall mitt, an afpmeal
for and an argument against the measure to be prinled along with the following
Sialemenl cn the front rover• or If none, on the heading of me first pug,, of the
printed arguments:
the a norse�rs in SuVWrt or opposition Ot me proposed tows am the opinions of
The city clerk shall enclose a printed copy of both arguments with each sample
build; provided, that only those arguments filed pursuant to this sector shall be
Printed and enclosed with the Sample ballot The printed arguments arc "official
matter" within the meaning of those words used in Societies 10010.
Printed arguments submitted to voters in accordance hub thlssectlen she
be
Idled either "Argument In Favor Of Measure _ __ _ "or "Argume d Against
Measure __ ___ ___; • accordingly, the blank spaces being filled In Only wjib the
I
etter or number, If soy. which designates the measure. At the discretion of the
clerk. the word "Proposition" may be subMtuled for the word ^Measure'• In Such
lilles. Words used In the title shall no be counted when dem mining the length
of any argument.
(Amended by Scars INN C. 812, §'65.)
5014. Argument ao accepted Wilk", umes,
A ballot argument shall no be accepted older this article unie55 accompanied
by The Mme or names of the Person or persons Submitting it, 0r, if Submitted on
behalf Of an orgoniretfoo, the name of the organization and the Mme of at lead
Oft of its principal Officers.
No more Than five signatures shall appear with any argument Submitted under
(his article. In lase any argument is signed by more than five persons the
sfgnalures of the first five shall be printed.
(Added by Smm. 1976, C. 248. §3.)
55th. Argument sal accepted Wilk", "meal from penses iaelaaed b
text.
A ballot argument or, if applicable. a rebuttal argument which includes in Its
(en the name of a person, other than the author of the argument, who is
represented as being for or against a measure, shall not be W"Pled oaks the
argument is accompanied by a Signed consent of Such Person. The emlTeal of a
Person. Other than an individual, shall be signed by an officer or Other dray
authorized repre imialive. "Person" as used in this Section means any individual .
partnership. corponllon, association committee, lahor orpniratioa and any
other arganiralton or group of persons.
(Added by Slabs. 1978, c. 172, a)
5511.5. gtbtnnl argument&
(a) It any person submits an argument against a city measure, and an argument
has been filed in favor of the city measure. the clerk shell imtttedlamly send
copies of that argument to the persons filing the argument in favor of the city
measure. The persons filing the argument fn favor of the city r s may
Prepare and Submit a rebmlal argument Mf exceeding 250 words. IN"
• RESOLUTION NO. 84- �((p
M
L J
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ME CIYY OF WIND
CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS MFt1RERS TO
FILE A WRITTEN ARGUIEMT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE AND
DIRECTING M CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
WHEREAS, A special mwnitipal election is to be held in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California on November 6, 1984 at Which there will be
submitted to the qualified elector. of the City the following measures:
Shall the electors elect a Mayor and four City Councileembers?
Shall the ten of office of Mayor be two years?
Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years?
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA,
CALIFORNIA, DOSS RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETCRNINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.• That this City Council, being the legislative body of the
City of RenTsmoaga, authorizes the following exeberm of that body to file
A written argument in favor of the City measure set forth in the recitab
hereof in sccordance with Article 4, Chapter y, Division 5 of the elections
Code of the State of Gllfornia and to change the argument until and including
.Minot 14, 1984, the date fixed by the City Clark after which no segments for
at against the City measures may be submitted to the City Clerk.
and authorises the following aeabers of that body to file a written argument
against the City esasure at forth in the recitals hereof in accordance with
Article 4. Mapes, I. Division 5 of the Elections Code of the Sure of
California and to change the argument until and including ,MAust 14, 1984, the
date fixed by the City Clerk after which an arguments for or against the City
measures may be submitted to the City Clerk.
SECTION 2: That the city council direct, the city clerk to transmit a
copy of cgs measure to the city attorney, unless the organization or salarias
of the office of the city attorney are affected. The city attorney shall
prepare an impartial analysis of the measure, showing the effect of the
measure, on the existing law AM the operation of the measure. If the measure
affects the organisation or salaries of the office of the city attorney, the
city clerk shall prepare the impartial analysis. The impartial analysis shall
be filed by August 14, 1984, the date set by the city clerk for the filing of
primary ae8ments.
PASSED, APPROVED, aM ADOPTED this let day of August, 1984.
9 �.
r�
u
•
J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 1, 1984
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Gary Richards, Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: SIGN AMORTIZATION PROGRAM
US
SUMMARY: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of July 11, 1984,
reviewed the proposed alternatives for the Sign Amortization Program.
Of the alternatives recommended, the Planning Commission chose
alternative one, which requires full compliance of all nonconforming
signs within a specified time period.
The Planning Commission felt that all nonconforming sign owners should
be corrected by the same procedure. The Commission also indicated that
certain nonconforming signs should be excluded from this program because
of their historical significance to the City, (i.e., Sycamore Inn, Magic
Lamp, Thomas Bros. Winery (Foothill /Vineyard).
Attached for your review and consideration is the Planning Commission
Staff Report which out Lines the alternatives, the proposed first
notification letter, the composite list of all nonconforming signs, and
the Planning Commission Minutes of the meeting of July 11, 1984.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the implementation
o a teernative one (1) based upon the intent of the Rancho Cucamonga
Muni ipal Si dinance.
Re - sdbmitted,
RG:GR:Jr
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report - July 11, 1984
Planning Commission Minutes - July 11, 1984
93
1977
9
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��cnMOic
STAFF REPORT
>.
F $ il?
DATE: July 11, 1984
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Gary N. Richards, Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: SIGN AMORTIZATION PROGRAM
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is to provide a program for the
ordeemoval and /or correction of signs which became nonconforming
due to the adoption of the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance in 1979.
BACKGROUND: When the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted the Sign
Or finance to replace the existing County ordinance, all signs existing
within the City at that time which did not meet the criteria of the new
ordinance were defined as legal but nonconforming and were given a five
(5) year amortization period in which to be brought into conformance or
removed. This 5 -year amortization period expired on May 4, 1984.
Therefore, according to the Sign Ordinance, all signs which became
nonconforming due to its adoption must be: (1) Removed according to the
amortization program; or, (2) Brought into conformance with the adopted
Sign Ordinance. options to these alternatives include signs with
historical significance or hardship cases.
REVIEW OF PROPOSED PROGRAM: The following amortization program has been
developed to bring these signs into conformance with the adopted Sign
Ordinance or removed. This program includes a major versus minor
violation concept for the purpose of correcting—the more flag
violations first. Therefore, nonconforming signs which exceed current
sign requirements by 50 percent or more for height, size, type, location
and number, shall be classified as major sign violations. Due to
limitations in staff resources, a list of all businesses and the nature
of violation is attached. These violations will be abated first under
this program.
Signs which do not exceed the current sign requirements of height, size,
type, location and number by 50 percent will be classified as minor sign
violations. These violations will be abated through current correction
provisions for nonconforming signs. As the uses change ownership or
make building revisions, processing of these violations would proceed.
All potential violators will be sent a letter apprising them of their
status, the nature of the amortization program and the options available
to them (see attached). The notification process will include the
9y ITEM M
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Sign Amortization Program
July 11, 1984
Page 2
•
issuance of two violation notices. The initial notice will inform the
sign owner of the problem and request a response within thirty (30) days
as to their intentions of either removing or bringing the nonconforming
sign into compliance. The second notice will be accompanied by a
warning citation extending to the sign owner ninety (90) days in which
to remove or bring the nonconforming sign into compliance. If at the
end of this time period the sign in question has not been removed or
brought into compliance, a citation will be issued commencing the legal
action process.
An appeal process will also be available to owners of nonconforming
signs. If an owner disagrees with the City's decision to classify their
sign as nonconforming because they feel their sign meets the criteria
for historical significance or hardship cases, they may apply for a
decision of the Planning Commission within ten (10) days of receipt of
the initial notice of violation.
News releases regarding the sign amortization program have already been
written and released for publication in the Chamber of Commerce Resource
and the City Grapevine informing the public that the 5 -year amortization
period has elapsed, and that the City will be commencing its initial •
notification process. Future news releases are scheduled for the Rancho
Cucamonga Times.
Options to this process include signs which have historical
significance. Upon written request by a sign owner, the Planning
Commission has the authority to allow nonconforming signs to remain if
they feel the sign in question is of historical significance to the
community and that it meets the criteria noted in the Sign Ordinance.
Historical signs should be signs which have been identified as those
having had an integral part in the early development and establishment
of our community. Staff has indicated which signs may have that
designation based upon the intent of the Sign Ordinance.
Another option available to nonconforming sign owners is that of
hardship status. Again, the owner has the responsibility of applying in
writing to the Planning Commission. The Commission has the authority,
according to the Sign Ordinance, to permit retention of a nonconforming
sign if the owner can clearly demonstrate that an extreme hardship or
unusual circumstance exists which warrants the rentention of the sign.
REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES: There are three (3) possible alternatives to
sign amortization:
1. Require full compliance of all nonconforming signs
according to the Sign Amortization Program with specified
time periods for removal. •
a5
n
U
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Sign Amortization Program
July 11, 1984
Page 3
2. Require full compliance of all major nonconforming signs
within a specified time period.
3. Implement an ongoing compliance program for all
nonconforming signs.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that alternative number two (2) be
imp emeT n-1 LeT--aTong with the proposed notification program noted in the
text of this report.
Spect 44y submitted,
Ri
Ci y Planner
RG:GR:jr
Attachments: List of Violators (To be delivered under separate cover)
Example of Letter to Potential Businesses
• Sign Requirements
•
9(�
• PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE VIOLATION LETTER
On April 4, 1979, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive
Sign Ordinance that recognized the need for signs as a means to identify
businesses, and the importance of signs as a design element within the
Community. This Ordinance was adopted in order to make our City
attractive to residents, visitors, and commercial, industrial and
professional businesses, while maintaining economic stability through an
attractive signing program.
All signs existing within the City at the time of adoption which did not
meet the provisions of the new ordinance were classified as legal, but
nonconforming. These nonconforming signs were given a five (5) year
amortization period in which to be brought into conformance or
removed. Your ( Type Sign ) sign was classified as nonconforming
because ( Reason for Nonconformity ), and therefore must be brought
into conformance or removed.
In certain cases, owners of nonconforming signs may apply for the
designation of Historical Significance or Extreme Hardship. Historical
signs should be signs which have been identified as those having had an
integral part in the early development and establishment of our
• community. Extreme Hardship signs are signs which clearly demonstrate
that an extreme hardship or unusual circumstance exists which warrants
the retention of the sign. If you believe your sign lies within the
•realm of the above designations, a request must be made to the Planning
Division within ten (10) working days. Such requests are heard before
the Planning Commission prior to action.
The City has adopted a Sign Amortization program which provides that you
respond to this notification within thirty (30) days as to your
intentions in correcting this violation of the Rancho Cucamonga Sign
Ordinance. Your response should include the following:
1. Within a period of not more than ninety (90) days, the
correction or removal of the nonconforming sign.
2. Description and drawings of revised plan with attached
sign application permit.
3. Timing of correction measures.
Our staff, or Gary Richards, will be glad to answer any questions you
may have regarding this natter. Feel free to contact this office
between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at (714) 989 -1851.
Thank you for your cooperation.
7%
G. Nonccnformine Sims
1. Intent of Provisions. R is the intent of this chapter to recognize that the •
eventual ehmma[mn of existing signs that are not in conformity with the
provisions of this title, is as important as is the prohibition of new' signs that
would violate these regulations.
2. General Recuirements
(a) A nonconforming sign may not be:
1. Changed to another nonconforming sign. /
2. Structurally altered to extend its useful life.
3. Expanded.
3. Reestablished after a business discontinued for sixty days.
5. Reestablished after damage or destruction of more than fifty
percent of its value, as determined by the building official.
(b) No new sign shall be approved for a site, structure, building or use
that contains nonconforming signs unless such nonconforming signs
are removed or modified to conform with the provisions of this title.
(c) No building permit shall be issued for any structures, buildin;
expansions or new buildin; construction on a site which contains •
nonconforming signs, unless all signs on the site are brought into
conformance with this title. This does not include interior alterations
which do not substantially change the character or intensity of the
site.
3. Amortization Recuirements
(a) Every sign which does not comply with the provisions of this title
shall be amortized in accordance with the following schedule:
Value Time Period
Signs under $250 180 days
$250- -$500 1 -1/2 v<ar
$50(1- 51,000 2 years
Over $1,000
(b) The value of a nonconforming sign shall be determined by the buildin;
official in accordance with the latest material valuation schedules.
(c) Time periods for amortization of nonconforming signs shall begin
from the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title. Any
sign which becomes nonconforming either by reason of amendment to
this title or by annexation to the city, shall also be subject to the
provisions of this title. The period of time within which such sign •
must be abated shall commence upon the effective date of such
amendment or annexation.
9F V' no
• 4. Historical Signs. Signs which have historical significance to community but
do not conform to the provisions of this title may be allowed to remain
provided that the Planning Commission makes the following findings:
(a) The sign has historical significance for the community.
(b) The sign does not create nor cause a traffic hazard.
(c) The sign does not create a visual nuisance to the character of the
community.
(d) The sign is properly maintained and structurally sound.
(e) The sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties.
5. Hardship Cases. Under cases of extreme hardship and unusual
circumstances, the Planning Commission shall have the authority to allow
the retention of a nonconforming sign if the Commission specifically finds
that extreme hardship and unusual circumstances exist.
The proponent of such request, shall have the burden of clearly
demonstrating that an extreme hardship and unusual circumstance does
exists and warrants the retention of such sign. The Planning Commission
shall conduct a public hearing. The procedures for conducting the public
hearing and application fees shall be regulated by the variance procedures
• and fees established by the City Zoning Ordinance.
The Planning Commission shall use the following findings for determining
that an extreme and unusual circumstance exists:
(a) The site has a unique character or features that causes visibility
problems.
(b) The sign does not create a traffic hazard.
(c) The sign does not create a visual blight to the community.
(d) The sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties.
(e) The sign is properly maintained and structurally sound.
(f) No other signing alternative or design would be feasible or be able to
provide reasonable signing in accordance with this ordinance.
If the Planning Commission finds that an extreme turd unusual circumstance
exists, but that the design or condition of the sign creates a visual blight,
then the Commission can grant a relief from the amortization of the
nonconforming sign with the condition that the sign be remodeled to a more
aesthetic - design. If a business or shopping center, found to have the above
hardship and which contains nonconforming signs, is remodeled, then the
• Commission shall have the authority to request that the nonconforming signs
be upgraded to match the design and architectural style of the remodeled
buildings.
99
® LIST - NONCODMING SIGNS age 1
REASON FOR
ORD. SECTION
SIGN OWNER & LOCATION
TYPE OF SIGN
NONCONFORMITY
VIOLATED
MAJOR /MINOR
1. Allura Dairy
1 -18' F/S sign.
Height
14.20.1 DO(1)
x
8799 Grove Avenue
_
Height
14.20.100(1)
1
X
2. Grove Self -Serve Car Wash
_
1 -15' F/S pole sign.
8761 Grove Avenue
1 -Roof Sign.
Sin location____
14.16.020(A)
X
3. Exxon Service Station
1 -30' F/S pole sign.
Height
14.20.100(1)
X
2 -Price signs attached to light poles
Pricing signs only
14.20.100(a)
X
permitted on
Monument sign.__
14.20.100(1)
X t
4. Arrow & Grove Market
1 -18' Pole sign.
Height
8114 Arrow Hwq
14.20.100(1)_
5. Larry's M Rentals—
7 -20' F/S sign.
Height
Bernardi
8285 San Bernardino Rd.
I
6. Fat Daddys Pizza & More
— _ -__- — —
1 -Roof Sign.
_ — -
Sign location
14.16.020(A)
-%
—
X
8111 Foothill Blvd
7. International TV & Video
1 -Roof Sign.
Sign location
14.16.02D(A)
X
8111C Foothill Blvd
1 8. Nail Saloon
1 -Roof Sign.
Sign location
14.16.020(A)
X
81110 Foothill Blvd
9. Foothill Lawnmower
1 -20' F/S sign.
Height
14.20.100(1)
X f
8131 Foothill Blvd
10. Red Hill Auto Center
1 -13' F/S sign.
Height
14.20.100(7)
X
8133 Foothill Blvd
11. Red Hill Liquor _
-Roof Sign.
Sign location
14.16.020(A)
X
8161 Foothill Blvd
12. Mobil Service Station
1 -15' F/S Pole Sign,
Height
14.20.100(4)
X 1
7126 Amethyst Avenue
13. Magic Lamp Inn
-15' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
14.20.100(1)
X
8189 Foothill Blvd
-12' F/S Monumant Sign.
Height
14.20.100(1)
1 %
-Roof Sign.
Sign location
14.16.020(A)
14. Lowe's Power Tools
- Roof Sign.
Sign location
14.16.020(A)
X
8269 Foothill Blvd
15. China Alley
-15' Monumant Sign w/48' Copy.
Height & Size
14.20.1OD(1)
X 1
_ 8270 Foothill Blvd
16. Century 21 Pools Inc.
_
1 - 25' F/S Pole Sign
Height
14.20.100(1)
X
8291 Foothill Blvd
I
LIST - NONCONFORMING SIGNS
Page 2
REASON FOR
ORD. SECTION
SIGN OWNER & LOCATION
TYPE OF SIGN
NONCONFORMITY
VIOLATED
MAJOR /MINOR
17. Sycamore Inn
1 -15' F/S Sign w/96' of copy.
Height & Size
14.20.100(1)
x 1
8318 Foothill Blvd
1 -15' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
14.20.100(1)
x
18. Deans's Tire Service
8393 Foothill Blvd
Numerous Roof Signs------------
1 -Roof Sign
Sign location _
Sign location
14- I6.020(A)___
14.16.020(A)
x
%
19. Bear Gulch Bar & Grill
8411 Foothill Blvd.__
—�
20. Casa Volante
4 -F /S Ground Signs.
Type & Number
14.16.020(L)
X
8651 Foothill Blvd
1 -12' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
14.20.100(1)
x
21. Century 21 - Hembree Realty
8746 Foothill Blvd
22. Roller City
1 -30' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
14.20.100(1)
x
8874 Foothill Blvd
1-Roof Sign. -
Sign location
14.16 ,__
, 020(A�_
14.20.100(1)
_% _ __ __
I x
_____
23. Thomas Vineyard Winery
1 -12' F/S Sign w /105' of sign copy.
Height & Size
8916 Foothill Blvd
14.20.100(1)
_
x
24. Red Hill Liquor
1 -20' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
8939 Foothill Blvd
25. New Kansan Motel
1 -12' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
14.20.100(1)
%
9300 Foothill Blvd
Height - -` - -_�
14.20.100(1) -_-
- - - -r_% -
- --
26. Billies Style Salon
1 -10' F/S Pole Sign. �_ -- —
9336 Foothill Blvd
Sign location
14.16.020(A)
%
__
27. Cucamonga Wheels
1 -Roof Sign.
9464 Foothill Blvd
14.20.100(1)
% 1
28. Perry's Market
1- 35'F /S Pole Sign w1240' of Copy.
Height & Size
9477 Foothill Blvd.
29. Chevron Service Station
1 -30' F/S Pole Sign w /48' of Copy.
Height & Size
14.20.100(4)
x
9511 Foothill Blvd
1
30. Shell Service Station
1 -25' F/S Pole Sign. !
Height
14.20.100(4)
x i
_ 9524 Foothill Blvd __-
1 -12'. F/S Pole SSgnHeight
1 -15' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
14.20.100(_4)
14.20.100(1)
_ - x____
x 1
____
31. 1st Trust Bank
9555 Foothill Blvd
Height & Size
x
32. Wilmington Federal Savings
1- 20'F /S Sign w /48' of sign copy.
9590 Foothill Blvd
4.20.100 1
4.20.100
x
33. McOonalds
9659 F ill Blvd
1 -30' F/S Pole Sign w/72' of copy.
1 F/S Pole Sign.
Height & Size
-35'
eight
i
__-
LIST - NONCOW&MING SIGNS
r1
_
dtje
d-
SIGN OWNER 8 LOCATION
TYPE OF SIGN
REASON FOR
ORD. SECTION
NONCONFORMITY
VIOLATED
MAJOR /MINOR
34.
Carl's Liquor
9677 Foothill Blvd
1 -Roof Sign.
Sign location
14.16.02D(A)
X I
_
2 -to man wall si ns.—
____
Number signs
1.4_._2.0_.700
X
35.
Rancho Auto Sales
9751 Foothill Blvd
1 -12' F/S Sign.
_of _s_i
Height
_
14.20.100(1)
_J - - --- - ----
X
_
1 -Roof Sign. _
— _9__(_?
Si n lac ation
14_16,020 A
X
36.
Yamaha of Cucamonga
9760 Foothill Blvd
1 -Sign exceeds roof line.
Sign location
14.16.020(A)
%
Exceeds ermitted number
_
of suns.
_Number of si ns
g.—.
14.20.100
37.
PG Automotive
1 -Roof Sign.
Sign location
_ _ _
14.16.020(A)
_X__
9776 Foothill Blvd
1 -Roof Sign.
Sign location
14.16.020(A)
X
X
38. Foothill Auto Body
9777 Foothill Blvd
39.
Auto Plaza
9797 Foothill Blvd___
---
1-20' F/S Pole Sign w /80'
of copy
- - -- - --
Height 8 Size
'- --
14.20.100(7)
- -)- - -- - --
X
_
40.
3 -Unit Commercial Center
1 -15' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
14.20.100(1)
—
X
9798 Foothill Blvd
0 41.
A& R Tire Service
9820 Foothill Blvd
1 -15' F/S Pole Sign w/48'
9
of Co py.
Height & Size
14.20.100(1)
X
42.
Foothill off -road Spec.
1 -12' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
74.20.100(1)
I
9860 Foothill Blvd
14.20.100(1)
X
C
43. Rancho Automotive & Gas
1 -15' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
9888 Foothill Blvd _
X
44.
Equi's Restaurant
1 -20' F/S Sign w/32' of sign
copy.
Height & Size
14.20.100(1)
10006 Foothill Blvd _
X
45.
Gilberto's Dinner
1 -2D' F/S pole Sign _ w /60'
of copy.
Height & Size
14.20.100(1)
1
10025 Foothill Blvd
X
46.
Texaco Service Station
7 -25' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
14.20.100 (4J
10080 Foothill Blvd
%
I
47.
Circle K Food Store
10110
1- 25'F /S Pole Sign w/48' of Copy.
Height & Size
14.20.100(1)
X 1-
Foothill Blvd
48.
Residence
10150 Foothill Blvd
1 -15' F/S Sign.
Height
74.20.100(1)
X - r —_— —_ --
I
49.
Espinosa Tires
1 -12' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
14.20.100(7)
10218 Foothill Blvd
X
50.
Opici Winery
1 -10' F/S Sign. _ - - --
Off -Site - - -- - --
14.16.020(G) _ --
_� - - —_-
.
SWC Haven & Foothill Blvd
X
-- LIST - NONCONFORMING SIGNS Page 4
REASON FOR
ORD. SECTION
SIGN OWNER & LOCATION
TYPE OF SIGN
NONCONFORMITY
VIOLATED
MAJOR /MINOR
51. Chaffey College
1 -15' F/S Pole Sign w /9b' of copy.
Off -Site
14.16.020(G)
X 1
SWC Haven & Foothill Blvd
1 -Roof Sign.
Sign location
14.16.020(A)
X
52. Cowgirl Theater
11871 Foothill Blvd
1 -12' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
14.20.110(1)
X
53. C.M.A. Wine & Vinegars
11929 Foothill Blvd
54. Circle K Food Store
1 -30' F/S Pole Sign w /48' of copy.
Height & Size
14.20.100(l)
X
12854 Foothill Blvd
2 -10' F/S Pole Signs.
Height & Plumber
14.20.100(l)
X
55. Etiwanda Realty
12854 Foothill Blvd
______L_____
56. Farmer Jacks Restaurant
1 -20' F/S Pole Sign.
Height
14.20.100(1)
X-
12892 Foothill Blvd
14.20.100(1)
X
57. Town & Country Liquors
—
1 -15' F/S Pole Sign.
_ -- —_
Height
12962 Foothill Blvd
T 58. Rancho Welding
1 -Roof Sign.
Sign location
14.16.020(A)
X
10479 8th Street
Height
14.20.100(1)
X
59. Hartwell Corp.
1 -15' F/S Sign.
9825 6th Street
14.16.020(A)
X
60. Cleveland Crane & Eng.
1 -Roof Sign.
Sign location
8881 Utica Avenue
14.20.110(1)
X
61. Matheson
1 -10' F/S Sign.
Height
8800 Utica Avenue
14.16.020(A)
I
X
62. Electrical Products Corp.
1 -Roof Sign.
Sign location
9449 Santa Anita
63. Precision Hydraulic Sys. Inc.
1 -12' F/S Sign.
Height
14.20.110(1)
X
8821 Etiwanda
Sign location
14.16.020(A)
I
X 1
64. Butlers Diner
1 -Roof Sign.
8733 Etiwanda Avenue
1 -20' F/S Pole Sign w/32' of copy.
Height & Size
14.20.110(1)
X
65. Kaman Bearing
8545 Etiwanda Avenue
66. R.C. Medical Building
1 -8' F/S Sign W/4 Tenants listed.
Exceeds number
14.20.100(2)b
X
7388 Carnelian Avenue
permitted to be
1
listed.
67. Al ph
9640 el i ne Rd
1 -30' F/S Sign w/144' of •n copy.
Height & Size
14.20.100(1)
_
X
—
A LIST - NONCO�MING SIGNS Page .
.
REASON FOR
ORD.
SECTION
SIGN OWNER & LOCATION
TYPE OF SIGN
NONCONFORMITY
VIOLATED
MAJOR /MINOR
68.
7- Eleven Store
1 -20'
F/S Pole
Sign.
Height
14.20.100(1)
X 1
9464 Baseline Rd
69_
Sunrize Center
1- 20'F /S Pole Sign
w/48'
of copy.
Height & Size
14.20.100(2)
X
8685 -8601 Baseline RdJ
1 -25'
F/S Sun
W /720'_of
Sign coy_.
Height &Size __
_14.20.100j2)
_
_ X_�___ _
___ _
70.
Ameron
1 -15'
F/S Sign
w/64' of
Sign copy.
Height 8-Size
14.20.110(1)
X
12459 Arrow Rte.
14.20.110(1)
71. Bookside Winery
3 -30' Signs painted on towers.
Height
X
12281 Arrow, Rte.
_
_____
72.
TPAC
1 -10'
F/S Sign
w/32' of
sign copy.
Height & Size
14.20.110(1)
X
12167 Arrow Rte.
14.16.030
__
X
73. La Mancha Solf Course
1 -15' F/S Sign w /60' of sign copy.
Height & Size
10495 Arrow Rte.
14.20.100(1)
X
74. Santolucito's Italian Market
1 -Roof Sign.
Sign location
10095 Arrow Rte.
3 75.
Matts Hardware
8810 Archibald Avenue
1 -12'
F/S Pole
Sign.
Height
14.20.110(1)
I X
'
1
1
I
I
i
I
I
I
1
I
r
• Minute Excerpt - Planning Commission Minutes - July 11, 1994
M. SIGN AMORTIZATION PROGRAM
Senior Planner, Tim Beetle, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman Stout indicated that he did not take option two to mean that the
signs that are in minor violation would be defer- ^d and that the major
violations would be taken care of first.
Commissioner Barker stated that what they will be doing is taking option one
and prioritizing those signs which would be handled first.
Chairman Stout stated that his personal feeling is that the signs must be
taken care of in order to be equitable. Further, some people will take care
of their signs voluntarily and perhaps the best way to approach this is to
handle the worst violations first.
Commissioner Rempel cited the portion of the ordinance written for historical
signs such as the Sycamore Inn, Thomas Vineyard, and the Magic Lamp.
Mr. Beedle explained that at the request of the applicant, signs of historical
importance would come back to the Commission for special designation. He
indicated that the Commission could direct staff as to whether they would wish
to review these requests.
Commissioner Barker asked that since the sign ordinance was written with
places such as the Sycamore Inn and Thomas Vineyards in mind, what is the
logic of their appearing before the Commission to say that they are something
special.
Chairman Stout related that this determination has already been made.
Mr. Beedle stated that the approach that can be used is to have a list of
those signs specifically designated as having historical significance.
Further, it would also provide a vehicle for others who would like to have
their signs considered for this designation.
Commissioner Rempel asked how many additional Planning Commission meetings it
will take to hear these requests.
Chairman Stout felt that there should be full compliance with the sign
ordinance of all nonconforming signs and that the major violations be the
first to be taken care of, Additionally, a list should be prepared of those
signs that are of historical importance.
Commissioner Rempel stated that he and Mr. Sceranka, who sat on the Commission
at the time the sign ordinance was approved, would be able to come up with a
list of those signs that should have historical designation. He indicated
that this list would be given to the Code Enforcement Officer so they would
not be bothered. Commissioner Rempel further stated that he does not see a
difference between major or minor violations as they must all be asked to
conform. He suggested that staff go through the list of nonconforming signs
and take care of all of them.
for
Mr. Hopson stated that in deference to the statute, the Commission really
•
should have some action somewhere that says that this sign is nonconforming,
but it is o.k. because there should be some administrative action to establish
the exemptions.
Chairman Stout asked that a list be prepared to be reviewed by the Commission
on whether historic designation is given in order to avoid conflicts.
Mr. Beedle replied that a list will be prepared for the next Planning
Commission meeting of those signs that are eligible for historical
designation. Following the preparation of that list, Mr. Beedle indicated
that the community will be advised that the program has begun to abate the
nonconforming signs.
The Commission concurred with option number one, to require full compliance of
all nonconforming signs according to the Sign Amortization Program with
specified time periods for removal be implemented.
Mr. Sceranka stated it is critical that the Planning Commission commit to the
100 percent enforcement of the sign program. Further, that the Chamber of
Commerce has been approached by many of its members who want to see
conformance with the program and who are anxious to see the golden arches go
down.
Mr. Sceranka indicated that the Chamber of Commerce is 100 percent behind this
program.
•
Commissioner McNiel asked if this report will be forwarded to the City
Council. Mr. Beedle explained that it will be taken to the Council as an
information item.
1, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing is a true and accurate account of the Planning Commission
M/i�I tes 0 y 11, 1984.
ary
/p6
J
• M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney
DATE: July 26, 1984
RE: Status of Unfunded State Mandated Local Programs
The "Property Tax Relief Act of 1972 ", popularly known as
"Senate Bill 90 ", limited local governments' power to levy property
taxes. Senate Bill 90 also provided that the state shall reimburse
local governments for all costs mandated by the state.
Subsequent to the enaction of Senate Bill 90 the Legislature
continued to enact legislation mandating new local programs without
• providing the wherewithal for local agencies to carry them out.
The Legislature was able to do so by simply stating that the see-
tions of the Revenue and'Taxation Code requiring reimbursement were
not applicable to a particular bill for a specified reason. As
these "disclaimers" had equal dignity with the legislation requir-
ing reimbursement, local governments were left without a basis to
challenge these disclaimers.
In 1980 the people of the state enacted Article XIIIB as
part of the Constitution. Section 6 of Article XIIIB reads:
SEC. 6. Whenever the Legislature or any
state agency mandates a new program or
higher level of service on any local gov-
ernment, the state shall provide a sub-
vention of funds to reimburse such local
government for the costs of such program
or increased level of service, except that
the Legislature may, but need not, provide
such subvention of funds for the following
mandates:
(a) Legislative mandates requested by the
107
local agency affected;
(b) Legislation defining a new crime or •
changing an existing definition of a crime;
or
(c) Legislative mandates enacted prior to
January 1, 1975, or executive orders or re-
gulations initially implementing legisla-
tion enacted prior to January 1, 1975.
The Legislature, undeterred, continued to pass legislation
imposing mandated programs on local agencies without providing the
funding to carry out those programs. Also, the Board of Control
continued with its practice of denying all claims for reimbursement
brought pursuant to Senate Bill 90.
Two (2) recent Court cases may, however, change this state
practice.
The first case is City of Sacramento -vs- State of California,
59 Cal.App.3d 182 (May, 1984). In this case the Court of Appeal •
upheld a trial court order issuing a Writ of Mandate directing the
Board of Control to hold a hearing to determine the amount of the
Plaintiffs' claims. The Court held that the state was required to
reimburse the County of Sacramento, and the other claimants, for
state mandated local costs which in that case were costs of payments
into the state unemployment insurance system on behalf of Plaintiffs'
public employees.
The second, and more interesting decision is a trial court
one rendered by the Sacramento County Superior Court in the case of
Contra Costa County, etc., et al. -vs- State of California. etc..
et al. I have been advised by the League of California Cities'
staff attorney that the Superior Court held that state mandated •
local programs for which no state funding is provided are invalid
and unenforceable against local agencies. I have ordered a copy
X09
pa-
• of the Judgment from the League, and I will be able to comment more
specifically once I receive it.
It is unknown at this time whether the state will appeal the
Contra Costa County case - decision.
In view of the holding in the City of Sacramento -vs- State
of California case it is my recommendation that the Finance Director
identify and quantify all expenditures made by the City with respect
to state mandated programs or higher levels of service in existing
programs and that appropriate claims therefor be filed with the
state Board of Control.
RED:s jo
cc: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager
cc: Harry Empey, Finance Director
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant to the City Manager
FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney
DATE: July 24, 1984
RE: General Municipal Election Dates
Government Code §36503.5 gives the City Council the power,
by ordinance, to change the general municipal election date to
coincide with any of the following:
(1) The statewide direct primary election;
(2) The statewide general election; and,
(3) School district elections which, by virtue of
• Elections Code §2602, are held on the first Tuesday after the first
Monday in November of each odd numbered year.
However, Government Code §36503.5(b) provides: "As the re-
sult of the adoption of an ordinance pursuant to this section, no
term of office shall be increased or decreased by more than 10
months."
Because of subsection (b) the effect of changing the general
municipal election date to coincide with the statewide primary or
the statewide general election would be to increase the terms of
existing council members. Changing the general municipal election
date to coincide with school district elections would result in a
decrease in the terms of existing council members.
0 RED: sja
//O
§ 36501 60VERNMENT CODE
DIVISION' 3, OFFICERS
PART 1. GENERAL
See.
36503.5 Ordinance, consolidated elections.
36503.1. Change of general municipal elecpon punuanl to 5 Ir "w36, time "'Ind for filing u
candidate fSeal.
36504. Citv in 0olusa County; general municipal electron on <ome day as statewide general
election; ordinance
36512.1. Vacancies: special eleeu.ni to fill; ordinance.
365112. Vacancies; special clocnon to fill after term of temporary Appointee: ordmunce.
365123. Repealed.
36516.2. Councilmen. compensation: increase by ordinance or amendment. prohihlunn against auto-
matic mereaes.
§ 36501. Governing officers and employees
win. W Ueri.iana lacuna a. • am<J
1, Dail rdfm MMim, unJar Ic, We `I O, am (o nn HL 9 -I r -0a n
nccr omryu6dd. reiemn Mc efecne ,d6.c
,,I o, .:,is and• For +,Ioul.e olhaa of coy v,irlf rl
§ 36502. Councilman cheek at treasurer, gasllfications: varanev upon nonresidence
A person is not eligihle to hold office m muneiiman, eft, cIc,k. I,, it, trea..urer ono- he is at the
time of avummg such office an elector of the oty.' • ' and_ae v r creel rrr of `h `rm n the
time nomination oaoers Am Issued to the can finlfl e , Rmtci� rctln9,_ "_'f_ d' to Pmet ono
If, during his term of nffice, he mrn'es his place of residence „IfLmie of the clty limP.s nr ceases to on
an decor of the city. his office shall Immediately become .acani.
Amended by Stan1.1975, e. 1030, p. 2432, § 4, urgency. eft. Sept. '9. 19:.51
Law Rnlo. Canamnrad,, -dune, r al• < .mdd,Io
l.ehna n of remunere reudem mon< Iron, .,porl noun, tau "I mndn<d uc � . • Ina „I ....mo
,,N., o0u< m Cabfm. a 119'4, 11 C W L R I I'e Jn 1,no , <. hen• I l9•a, I.0I ai It", 14. Y t'd. V
I`a
the Alec of .,.nm• phoning o evna, a and .
Vore<M DrcNane n n . a nUp.n J -.0 ,d:.. •nlmc6, � c
In¢ <lwnl I rd"'Jo'l coal 1101 mu.n¢,vvn hLFLrecn nr Oln
(honer of Of 2 \m Ocn 1 -. �•p
than of a.
(Inc 'A, 11 rulnnrv'mont !, nal ,ard.-
1. In Yemnl ,fa. n pro ..f har v,l n t :116n:c
In lido of nuFna .. I .olur rl 1. r•lontial . :,mtl rr� mh . fran,
f K,I,
of np(n JmNN nine rl umgnunorvhn of r.me •car 11`I'a I In (al Rry nea. 1 ('1.1 1,I„ a•r
§ 36503. General election: elective office.: term
(lnless ntherwme rcouo,4 by Section 11143 and nscepl Is onthnnvr J h1 Se !inn .W o;i -, or 36304, a
gg neral muencfpal election shall he held an the second Tuo, ial m \ono in each e.en.nnm , ri,d env
Ex c As otheruve prostdcl m this title.' ' ' II elect ve e u n(fl1__hod he fll� d be the eny' • '
Ownraln at s generl mumripal election. Cilc ' ' ' ofLa,n h, yn_n¢,eiort, Lent 'stir rhn;l hom
of�Lrr ' ' ' the r Drescr heel termer from the Tuesday swi,, 7 f1c lice., ,led nro .c4 nef their
see .... o. are elected and qualified.
(Amended by Slats. 1973,, 1146. p. 7367.4 21; Sta. 1978, r. 13;6., 1667.§ 22' Simn 1979, r. 376, p
1431. 6 2: Stala.1981. e. 1013. P, 3910, 4 2. urgency, eff Sept 0) 198L Jtats IP*^_. I. 4d6. 4 67.
Stats.1982, c. 218, P. § I
1`173 11011.0. "The unfor em• ,1<epnn 11111I of Inc o,vvnm.nl
S fon 41 of 61at%I4'I, < 1I0 , Crondel Cole In 4a1rn :I of ft, nil •hall noI Ia1e <ff<,, in h,
Underline mdlcalea changes or additions by amendment
94
GOVERNMENT CODE ' GOVERNMENT CODE § 36503.5
3.5: time nerind In, filing :n
me ds, as <utex'ide eum•ral
ppnmtee, "'tinny'.,
rent, pmndrrtir,n ee:nn>t :nrtm
� Al p OVn 41st.
•on nSareeida...
y treasurer n to
s[n[Crl ti
I{r•_(`IFn rl:l LL::!Ir
�cullnn !d;'4'! rif tha I' _
the at;. 'r rill +err ,n,I, I , ie
Inn lr In,h,b :.. a
rcJc11 nI.. an¢.1c
IV Jr
111 t d. Ypv n4. J: t <`1 or
pi,i " "onI..l... and .,1m11
+Vm m I r
nI 'N", I.'. nJ a.Illlri I'
ual r,^ rim 1
4. l: t'A:,I ri J1:
Y Seennn ali3oa:r r,r :36.-1114. a
in rarh ...,,•rnumwr,al scar.
all !», pl Ipn Ly thu et, a '
�ie<mc ilt� "dflm +hall Mid
hor vectlnn ,cod m:t:l Ihelr
7, § 2^_. Slats 1070, r iN p.
H: Stars . U2, r. 11:5. 0
secinn 1h,p ,-f the ol,...n I of
err ae1 .hall m,t lak<ellh'I in Ihv
addlt:ons by amendment
:r<m Aoembly Bill No. 996 of the Ml-'4 RcgWx
Scvlon Is razi Into tar. aryl a x amemn Sxu,m
4503 ul the Gc,,, nt Cale IACmmbly Btu Sa sy,k
.mss not chn'socul-
19'M 4m,N,w,n. Subcbluled "aeon Tni,hy In
>9n1" fcr "fin, Tuesday acr the first ,onus. m
March- In hm ernl<nn
IT9 anandnten,. ltuenef 1h< < <ee�u , nn runic, to
1y5m.
19112 AmrMnam. SuFsum,el "Section !3441" I
c'rmn WN 1" In iR fro a ui•,:fyiW "all
' ve Mhca" and "dmntTe n'lor ",;I, ceunc,inan.
:hi' it's Berk, and dun tie' ,reasoner" soul -dixI
tau•ely. m the —cW anlencc and rexrnte thy, IAq
•<TenIL ••Inch. ,nor ,o ,fin amendment. roJ: "Cyr
cncllrrcn. ,he cn• clerk. and nn veasur<r .:an Wd
hce for !our •an Scm the Tu<vuy vii con •,g in,.,
<:mma aid unul Weir I.Is se ela,al and uuah.
,,N„
Subudmahoa M Imitation by Sutv1912 I. 464 in
mm" eall non dmina iN 1982 Iona of he ;MIA,
regular on xhoh n ellenne on or hfoee laic. I.
951, ae nae undo, Buy, k Hoc. C. tj loot I
C. Reb.
General mtm,arol elei cmWucs. sa EI¢llnn<
Cede 8 2601,
L nand Slain Supreme Caul
Reargom.n, pl , at 1., •e :orlon, cn. mum
a1. •v M'Iw v Uns[smD, 19-9. 98 S.CI. 2493. 41' C S.
315. 5- Lliy J all
\1.144 of IMio.
Discoveersoon 4
N9mloanoos 2
1. 3
3 3850.3.5. Ordinance: consolidated elections
I. In gerwnl
N. rry'lal morn :on has tines, eru[tgl in camllelbete
umhnl w men Icr elan Ico due Ii, anvi
terms under Sale t9-1. 96. I lay. 5- OMAUy.G<n. 99,
' 'a
The eleclo:t o1 a genres fix c,,, Its va lave I,
poser, arWn i Wn and this •cco.r. t Su am tae
m If a [d• c•vnalman Tram icut .con in in .Ban,
xtlh ,hc a el the dfice ,4 na•ca xh¢M1
rtcadm fo(`una<r 44 3491V and Rro2 r6 O Aup
Gen. 32 -. a-a--e
There n a,, r.o v.b :fin Maem W<datiae olhm
If <In cisk and Inc appotnlne ogtm of cr,, uuruaer of
lag:w Bach. ar thou offim are r1,nln cauulola
wvkr the lax 31 OpaMly.0 183,
2, Soniuliwn
Scoar inns rnav te, alice. under EJevC I LN say
IS., 'eve Se March c WI, ee Q mumcosi
lemon ,rem Ikecmler 6, ;P3. uma 12 a.l «k npn m
OetemM 2'. i9'). 5- DMA, Gm, 89,
1. Teel,
The areendrmll of tle, sacnnn by Son, try. ch. I M,
r.hlch m,¢ f.,. tb< term of he v prommn� lave
nrGKnl Lq:1
ourl[dnlm in Imtr yay, 51 Opy,A•tS.Orn.
a. Diwdmoanm
\I [It,. Americana [uimbM in., at laMC me,hW M
Zing con muWil mists In San Eavani Calif.
aunal. Wool to oi 11ut I had
hen dens < m aIlan, o a... to eevinral O'w'e as a 1,, ,he
Wmlcn -cote ass <oncenra or open,w u a Inugt.e.
Iul d:•::e Io lunhn rasa tar economic di.-nanon:
word resealed ao I nnos"N halm it o; :W it,...
n W.11c. err f.hm, shin, m Wil.vw In the
da'mnl rsla• oSJ Ihere ,va, no tuMUnoui Poof M
na nn nmrnauon eve of any ra a elmma,
n u:uen cl any damning seh,rle basil aganis Mesory
\metica n,,i,nl I,nding tool nna 1911 Only mrse
Mencin.Amencvn had hen dec1N in coy council
de,ne fan :m: M<euacd ccsnr Simon. apmom
notch !T1 rl the roluuuon rondo Yan Sickle
IC \.19'91 r pfd 1261. [otn. demel IW $,a
3916, 446 1 5 99. N LEd.2d log
fa) A city' council may enact an ordinance requmne Its general municipal election to he heid on the
same day as the matex'Ide direct prima,' elcau.n, the tis, of the vatewule genera: election, or on the
day' of x..I district elec tions. m xt forth m 8<utio, ,602 rf I, Elections Grle Any .N;nance
adapted pursuant to this subdivision shall Semme .psfn ive non, the approval of the hoard of
supervisors. M oM'nanre II be rod by :Sc mtrd'f +urera '..mess tone hallnt sh le. vot no
eauiomenl or comic ' f• •ia[
°at tLals rannnt be handled.
,b) As the result of th daut nn of an , d ^ :n tts•eet'on no to nf sifice shall he
inSLeMeu or dec'e sed b' the, In •-
W If an election is held pursuant W suhdl.�w.is dal. and the electon is :m „nhdstod with another
el «ion, the provisions contained in Part 2.51 commencing von `cclica 23300) of Dislsion 14, exmot
Section M302 of the Elections Cade shall govern the consolidation. and, :f the county' derN is
that election.
requested to conduct the municipal election, Sanction 22003 of the Elecuona Cade shall be applicable is
LU If. pursuant W tubdivision (a), a general municipal election Is held on the same day as a
stelawide election or the same day as a xhool district elect,.,, those' • city officers whose • '
lermsaf office would have, poor Io the adoption of the ordinance. expired an the Tuesday succeeding
the second Tuesday in April of an even - numbered year, shall, instead, continue in their offices until no
Asterisk, indicate deletions by amendment
95
§ 36503.5 GOVERNMENT Cone
later than the fourth Tuesday niter the day of the general municipal eitrtinn and until their
r n are elected and nualified.
lJ Within 30 days after the ordinance horn d,, nperati;e nursuant to suluhyision la), the city clerk
shall use a notice to he marled to all registered voters Informing the enters of the change in the
election date. The notice shall also inform the enters that as a resent in the change in the electron
date, elected city officeholders' terms in office will be ... Lh dgki
f<1 If a et} adopts an ordinance pursuant to subdisis!nn tab the municipai elect,., following the
adoption of the ordinance and each municipal election therm([,, shall ire conducted on the date
specified by the city council, in accordance with s.noicisaon tai, unless the ordinance in question is
later repealed by the cite council.
If the date of I mudI6,nil election is h d t to this wet on at least one election
sha'I he held before th 1 J b r rt.
,.neat d or amended
(Added hT Stau.1981, c. 1013, p 5910. 6 :1, urgency, eff. gent :10. 1991. Amended by Slats I9a2, c.
21g ILL —.42.)
mat \mmmMwnl. Aali tau.. ,c car rohl ILL. Lot. .ot,inamJ ".haevj to, kn,,ird m.hr rnJA
..N iM, reealoJ Lille" suhh rill to .upL rn Lrmrrl, mho r,li r, od aJdeJ ibr Lmi .en
,uhf..ah. .ern `•noon 1 in:" ...N nine m Iha .neon
rcl¢ In¢ned "e
r •Inrmrrd wN d . m wN. Ida d.rmcrh low IlArar. Pelrrrme.
Lm " ...... .n `ter of ,d lay'. and ."i,1 rid etwune. =Sv
ntrrrmur w..e.v r. mma.eaN amt Vu.tlefee.l" �,� ehe l'1 \. F's..rnn. it
rv,
:?
$ MAUL Change of general municipal election pursuant to 5 36.503.5: time period for filing u
candidate
if the daze of a general municipal ebetion In chars Re 'Ilnuunt In <ertinn 3rislq I. un;mRhstaMln¢
.^,
c.mtmn :2536 of the Eleruons Pale. the Is nod to [Ile a; , enad:dat, for the F^naral mumcpal sleetmn
s�,
< ^.all !Y the same as the nor mation io /lest :n No as a ca,,i,!at, for the election in which the general
_ .r`.c•`.4''
:numapal election is conso'wiatmL
Addni by StaL.(953. ,•.:.59, p. —. § 2.1
$ 36501. City in Colusa County: general municipal election tin same day as statewide general
election: ordinance
(al A M. containing a Impulatrnn of liull r or lu.. than artcalled :n a county of the .;11th eta +s. as let
fnrth In Section 21,4071. may enact an ordinance regmnng a, gdn.rsi munecep :d eleetwn to Ire huui on
the same Ilan as the statewide general o ectem.
rbl The prilmelF If,ulefil"I'm r,,I .hall a,d, at the .n,,oi vnsuanp mumnpd election ueeurnn¢
of :r r Uric enae IInrllft of the ono in It ore.
lbi,i r,. the tt'mcni municipal clvcaom Immudut,1, fol'o,in, the adoption of the ,rimm,t, shall
hood on the s .end Tuesday in April m Uhl oust t r u :rig ,.trn.nomho ,"I ',car I,'! o'ing :he
av
dnptmn of the nnhnanre At such e act :on the crts'rl, rk 011 eau:. ,n null.. m to Included m the
,ample 'toi lot mailmgs .n fuming the -I r, of the -hang n 7',. riert,rn dale ;4.o It mrtirr shall also
infnrm the':nter, that is a result an the eianom In the gilt, rem -I ate, ciuvmd rep rrff!cehnlder! terms In
nff.ec wall be cslenrlod
It a rat \' adopts all nrdimmu , purs'Jant In °nlidimlion In , :M . mend en'snimt mam:elpal election
foi!owm¢ the adoptlnn If the onlln,m•v and • a h I a tic tied thereafter .nail he conducted on
the date que,diol in mlaveumn III unless the ordinal. In quo etion Is later reloaded I y the Ieglrlatne
'M,
I Added by SIMS.1070, c. 576, p. 1133, § A 1
$ 36505. Appointive officem: appointment
I ew Peden (nmmrn nr \idea of I11cess.
F.dmmn A Irma.... mnJem alone, from aenrmme prnvmrnmm M.nn.s as
pure.. Alice in Cal.ferma. 119.4) 11 l'.`w L P. I I'
lfngerImg .ndicates char,.. or addatlons by amendment
9fi
:?
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
O C,UCAafp '
z' r
� � A
1977
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
July 30, 1984
Members of the City Council and City Manager
Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
RDA AGENDA AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ADDENDUM
As a result of last week's meeting the necessary agendas and
supportive mated als have been included for Wednesday evening's
JACK LAM, AICP —
Community Development Director
JL:jk
Attach.