Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992/03/04 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGUZAH MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. March 4, 1992 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ++• City CounciLnembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Nexander, Councilmember Charles J. Buryuet, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilnember Pamela J. Wright, Councilmember •~• .Jack Lam, Cih~ Manager .James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 PAGE City Council Agenda March 4, 1992 1 All items •ubmitt ed for the City Couvcil Agenda must bm in writing. The deadlivv for aubmi[tivg these itev Ls 5:00 p.m. ov the wadneadsp prior to the oviing. Thm City Clerk'a Office racaivea all avch itua. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Roll Call: Suquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, Williams _, and Wright B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS .. Honoring Joseph OlIaria and Hie Contributions to the Community. 2. Present at ten of 5-Year Service Pin to Rat by lames and Pat Morriaon. 3. Preeentat ion of Pcoclamation Recognizing March ae Red Croee Month. 4. Presentation of Proclamation Recognizing Marsh 8-14, 1992 ae Girl Stout week. 5. Recognition of March ], 1992 ae Arbor Oay. C. COlOIUNICATION9 FROM TH6 PUBLIC Thia L^ the time od place foz the general public to addreaa the City Comcil. St•tm law prohib ita Lbm City Council fror eddreaa ivg oy iuw not pr•vioualy included ov the Agoda. The City Council map recHvm teat imony •n0 set the otter for e auD•egvent ustivg, Cooavts are to be limited to five minutes per ivdividuel. D. CON96NTD. CAL~~ Tha following Covuvt CaLnd•r ilea are expected to ba routivv avd nan-covtrovaraial. Thaq will be ecbd upon by the Council at one Cim• without diacu uion. Any item uy he roovd by • couvci Lamhar or ovbaz of the audience for disc utaiov. 1. Approval of Min ales: January 29, 1992 ~RCquet absent) February 5, 1392 PAGE City Council Agenda March 4, 1992 2 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/1'/92 and 2/19/92; i and Payroll ending 2/33/92 for the total amount of $1,732,389.73. 3. Approval to appropriate $5,000.00 from Deferred Revenue 12 Account 22-236 to prepare a design study for Rochester Tvenue Street Improvements north of Highland Avenue and to amend Fiscal Year 9}/92 budget to include appropriation in a Systems Expenditure Account. ~. Approval of Parcel Map 13900, located at the southeast 13 corner of '^.a :n Street and Reid Avenue, submitted by crr:n Brothers Construction Company. RESOLUTION NO. 92-049 14 A R'c SOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 13800 _. Approval to execute contract (CO 92-013) for Eny rneerin9 16 Servaces for Map and PLan Checking with Derbish, Guerra and Associates. 6. Approval to execute an Agreement for Acquisition of 17 Se cue ity, and Deposit for Lark Orive betwee0 its ea sre rly terminus and Rochester Avenue Street Rights-of- Way subm>tt ed by the William Lyon Company. RESOL'JT:ON NG. 92-038 1£; A RESCLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCiL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN.ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT OF OFF- SITE PROPERTY, SECURITY, AND DEPOSIT FOR LARA DRIVE FROM THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY ANO AUTHORIB IiJG Ti{E MAYOR ANO CITY CLERH TO SIGN SAM F, 7. Approval to execute ar. Agreement for the Instal iation of ?_3 5 : reek Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way at the southeast corner of Calave ras Avenue antl tti nth 5 :. reek ne r.een the Church of T. ne Nazare Ge and the City c.f Rancho i:~,; r.amcnca. Cit7 Council Agenda L~+L L March 4, 1992 3 RESOLUTION :r'0. o2_Oc0 Z4 A RESOL'JT ION OF THE CITY COCNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CV CA.MOIiG A, CALiFOAN:A, ACCEPTI NC AN ACRE ENE NT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND CED:CAT:ON ee^ROM T.... CHURCH Or THE NAZARENE AND AUTHORIZING THE HAYOR ANO CLTY CLERK TO SIGN THE SANE 8. Approval to execute Improveme r.t Fgreements, Improvement 2b Securities fer Improvements tc the south side of 24th Street from approximately 600 feet west of Cherry Avenue tc approximateiy 1900 feet east of Cherry Avenue, a Traffic Signal at 24th Street and Cherry Avenue, Improvement to Cherry A•+enue Erom 24th Street to the I- 15 Freeway and the installat :on of a 30 inch water line in 24th Street submitted by First City-HU Cter's Ridge Limited Partnership in cor.jvnct ion wir,h Tract 13750 located in the City of Fontana. RESOLUTION N0. 92-OEi z~ A RESOLUTION OF T. HE CITY COWC.'L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZM PROVEMENT AGPEENENTG, AND IMPROVEMENT SECVRZ TIES FOR 24 TE1 S.REET, CHERRY AVENUE, 2RAFFSC SIGNAL AND A 30 INCH WATER LINE IN 24TH STREET 9. Approval to accept improvements, P,e:ease pf Ecnds and 33 Notice of Completion Eor OR 97-E E, ioc ated on the southwest cor r.ez of Rochester A•: enue and Jersey eou levard. Release: Faithful Performance 9ond (Street) 590x,000.00 RESOLUTION :i0. 92-052 34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL O'F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOi1G A, CA:. 1?OP.N IA, ACCEPT Ii.G THE ?U9L iC IMPR O'JE ME:I TS rOR CR 27-E5 AND AUTHORIZING THE FIL aIG OF A ^O:ICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE 'dURi: 10. Approval tc ac:ep[ Improvements, Release of acnds and 35 Notice of Completion for DR °0-05, :orated on the no rthe_a st coiner of Hellman Avenue ani 9th Street. PAGE Cicy Cou r.ca Agenda March 4, 1992 4 Release: r'a it hful Performance Bond (Street) 5336,000.00 AESOLVTI09 iv0. 92-053 3Li A RESOLUTION OF THE C:TY COU::CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'JCAMONGA, CALIFOP.N IA, ACCEPTING TilE PllR?.IC :MPROVEME?.TS FOR DA 9C-OS AND AVTHORIZING TH.E FIL:::G OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION ee^OR THE WORK ll. Anoroval !^~ accept Improvements, Release of 9ontls and 37 [iOC icE Of COmQ1BtlOn far PdrCel Yap i[263. lac ated On the southeast corner of Highland Avenue ar.d Milliken Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bord (Street) 5336,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond Street) 5 33,600.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92-054 y~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ': HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAk.ONCA, CALTFORNiA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IN.P ROVEMENTS FCA PARCEL MAP 12263 At:D AUT HORI2I::G THE r-ICING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOA THE WORK le. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Honds Ear the 3y following Improvement Prcects: Arrow P.cute widening, Phaae 2, CO 90-009; Highland ReCOnsCruction Hermosa to Mayberry, CO 90-073; and Parks Retrofit, CO 90-022; Base Line Road Beaut if icatior„ CO 89-150; Hillside Read .Storm Drain, CO 90-002; 19th Street, West City Limits to Carnelian Avenue, CO 90-046; 19th Street and Amethyst Street, CO 90-073; 4th street and Haven Av enoe Entry Mcnument, CO 90-0:9; Amethyst S^..reet `.orth ~. :9th ' Street, CO 9U-051; 19rh Street, archrt ald ec Haver. Avenues, CO 90-139. E,_CONSENT ORDINANCES The follow Lng ord inauces pave had public hearings at the time of first reading. Secnnd readings ere ea petted to be routine and non-controve rsiel. They will be acted upon by the Council at ooe time without tliscusa ion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. ~ ~ PAGE / _ ~ Y y ~~~V,' (~ ~'q~ City Council Agenda ~ ~ `-~+`.+-' [ ~ l March 4, 1992 y~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ 4 ~ ( 5 i. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORCINAV CE PERTAINING TO MASSAGE TECHVIC'AYS ESTABLI SHMEHTS AYD SiM2 L'nR BL`S INESSES ORDINANCE NO. 405 (second ce ading) 4C A9 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CODNCIL OF THE C'. TY OF RANCHO CVCA.MONGA~ CAL:FORNIA~ ACD ING A NEW CHAPTER ?-24 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ML`N:CIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO MASSAGE TECHNICIANS, ES TP,9LISHHENTS AND SIMILAR BUSINESSES 2. CONS ID°RATION OF GE VELOPMENT COCE AF!E NC M,E NT 91-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CVCANO".;GA - A [ey-u est to amentl the dePrn aion of Massage Establishment ~r. Se ct ;.on 17.02.140 o_ the Deveiooment Code. ORDINANCE N0. 486 (second reading) 5D AN ORCINANCE OF TH°_ C..Y COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA.NONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE A.MENDHENT 91-05, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.02.140 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE THE DEFINITION OF MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT, A:JD MAKING FIND BJGS IN SJPPO RT THEREOF _. CONS ID EPATI CtJ TO ESTAeL:Sii A SPEED LI M.IT OF 40 MPH 09 'E°ON AVE`!UE r`ROM HAVEN AVE 9CE TO HICHLANO AVENUE AHD 45 MPH ON EAST AVENUE FROM 3ASE LINE ROAD TO HIG Y.L ANO AVENUE ORDINANCE NO. 407 (second reading) ~`~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CODUCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF SHE RANCHO CV CAHONGA CITY ^_CCE REGAPCING PP.I MA FACIE SPEED LINISS C4 CE RTA:N CITY STREETS F. ADVEATI SED PUBLIC HEARIN6E The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting [o receive public testimony. CONBIbE RATION TO ADOPT FIYAL REPORT FOR AH 939'5 SOURCE EI REDUCTI OtJ AND R°CYCLIHG ELEME9T AND HOUGEHO:_b Hp 2ARC OUS :Ins-e ELEy~NT PAGE City Council Agenda March 4, 1992 RESOL'JTiON NO. 92-055 D5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRO'.'I NG AB 939'5 FINAL REPORT FOR THE SOVRCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND FSNAL REPORT FOR THE HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT 2. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COfJD ITSONAL 'JSE PERMIT 91-20 - SHELL OIL - An appeal of o0 the Pla nnin? Commission's decision denying a request to establish a gas station, mini-market, and car wash on a i. 31 acre parcel in the Medium Residential Designation (8-13 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra 'Jista Planned Comm~u r.it y, located at the southwest corner of Base Lice Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-151-17. RESOLUTION NO. 92-OSti ]zZ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALIFORNIA, D E!JYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT HO. 91-20, A REQUE S': TO ESTABLISH A GAS STATION, MINI- MARKET, A^1^ CAR WASH ON A 1.31 ACRE PARCEL Ih THE MED IL'H RESIDENTIAL DESSGNA'TIOf1 (B-]4 O WELi:NG UN:TS PER ACRE] OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMM UNSTY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENGE, AND HAX:NG FI!JD UJGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-151-17 G. PVBLIC HEARINGS The following items have vo legal publicetiov or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public to stimovy. i. CO NS IDF. RATION OF EMINENT OON.A:N ACTION TO ACOUI RE PUBLIC ~~y RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR LARK CP.:VF {'ROM ITS EXISTING EASTEP,LY TER MI!r'15. TO ROCHESTER A'JEt_UE - Public hearing of prose ets regard inq em.nent domain acxion to acquire public right-oE-way Eor Lark Drive from its easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue at the property commonly known by Assessors Parcel Number 227-011-13 (a vacant lot) Eor the sonar: uct ion of street improvements across the south property line of said property. PAGE CiCY Council Agenda Harch 4, 1992 7 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -C57 i'o' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCA.MCNGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED P.ND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RAKING FINDINGS ItJ EVPpORT THEREOF i. CONSIDERATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACOUIPE PUBLIC jj3 RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR LARK DRIVE FROM IT'S EXISTING EASTERLY TERMINUS ':O ROCHESTER AVENUE AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF Hic HLAND AVENUE AND ROCHESTER A'JENUE - Public hearing of protests regarding eminent domain action to acquire public right-of-way for Lark Drive from its eaeteriy terminus to Rochester Avenue and the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue at the property locatetl at 11881 Highlantl Avenue (APN 227-011-09) for the construction of street improvements across the south property line of said property. RESOLUTION NO. 92-058 j3~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ONGA, CALIFORNIA, DE ^_LAR:NG THE PUBLIC NEEU AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF AA NCHO CUCAHONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF N. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair say open iha meeting for public input. No items 5u bmitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requestetl by the City Co until for diacuaeiov. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input. .. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO FILL VACANCY ON THE PL'B6IC SAFETY COM'AISSION (oral Report) PAGE City Council Agenda March 4, 1992 E 2. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT MOBILE HOME ACCORD RENEWAL Z4$ CONTRACT !CO 92-0141 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEZT MEETING This is the lime for City Covec i.l to idevtify the itmms thep wish to disease at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed et this meeting, oaly idevt ified for the next meeting. R. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PVELIC This is the time and place Eor the general public to eddreaa the City Covvcil. State lew prohibits the City Council from addressing evy issue vot previously included ov the Agenda. The City Council may receive teatimovy avd set the wetter for e subsequent meeting. Comenta are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOllRNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EZECVTI V£ SESSION TO DISNSS PERSONNEL MATTERS. I, Debra J. Adams, City Cletk of the City of Rancho Cacamo nga~ hereby certify chat a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted On Fe bcuary 28, 1992, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Coda 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Dr, ive. January 29, 1992 CITY OF RANCHU CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, January 29, 1992, for an Ezecutive Session to discuss pending litigation in the Serrano Room of the Civic Center, The Executive Session was recessed at 7:20 to the schrAuled joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Cily Council and Planning Commission in [he Rains Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at tOS00 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California The meeting was called to order at ?:24 p,m, by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Prescnt wcrc Cnuncilmcmbcrs: William 1. Alexander, Diane Williams, Pamela J. Wright (artivicei at 7:27 p.m J, and Mayor Dennis L. $IOIIL Ahsent was Councilmembcr: Charles I. Buquct II. Prescnt wcrc Planning Commissioners: Smanne Chitiea, John Mclcher, Wendy Vallctle, and Chairman Larry McNicl, Absent was Commissioner: Pelcr TOlstoy. Also prescm wcrc: Ixk Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwoal, Ahpnty City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Dirrctor, Brad Buller, Cily Planner; Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, Larry Flcndcrson, Principal Planner; Jce O'Neil, City Engineer, Shintu BoSC, Deputy Cily Engineer, and tan S»Ilon, Deputy City Clerk. t 454i• Jack I,vn, City Manngrr, staled there was a request to add an item at the end of Use agenda to approve a resolution that would allow the Cily tit apply for a grant application. Ii L t~l'1'~I,f~Y V1~A-VIS HOUSING MIX AI_Jp HOUSING OU JETTY Commissioner Mclchcr slalerl he hart asked for This item fn he nn the agenda diw to issues that wcrc raised with the rccem U.S. Homes project, where the developer requested smatter Tot sizes, and how this affected the Etiwanda Specific Plan. He rclt that the devclopmcnt occurring in the Etiwanda area seems to be missing the {Hint of the City Council/Planning Commission Joint Meeting Minutes January?9, 1992 Page 2 Edwanda Specific Plan, and does not seem to have the quality envisioned for the Euwanda area. He stated Nere is also some concern by members of the Commission about smaller lot subdivisions looking very crowded. He stated the Commission has been discussing the possibility of requiring more modest houses. He sWtrA they then stared In discuss what arc they trying W do wish housing, and the concem was raised that if you do something modest today, it could be the blighmd area o(Ihe fu Wro. Ceuncilmcmber Wright arrived at 7:27 p.m. ..x+». Commissioner Melchor sorted the question was does the City have any set of goals or ambitlons fur the housing mix and yuality other than those set in the Gencrnl Plan, or should the Commission tx encouraging the largest house compatible with the Int size instead of going with a more modest type of house. C'ouncilmcmbcr Alexander asked what was (heir dchniuun of"modesC' Commissioner Melchor stated dtcy were looking at having a smaller scale o(house on we lot instead of having a large, chunky two-story house filling up every possible inch allowed. He stated modest did not necessarily refer b a Icss erpenxivc hou.~c, that they would still be quality built homes. Councilmember Alexander fell it was a goad idea, and agreed that "modest" did not have to be equated to the cost. Chairman McNicl swtrd what stanrA this discussion is that it is consistent in the development community to use the maximum amount of syttam foouge allowed for dte footprint of the house, so you end up with a minimum amount n(setbacks and a very barge swcwre consuming the lot, which does not create an ideal view for a neighbor and hroks just like row housing. He swted a counterpoint would be to Iwk at communities to the west that were new I is 0 years ago comprised of what could he considered modest housing, and what they nok like now. Gmncilmemher Wright stated that form a lay person's point of view, she had always assumed the sim of the house was mocker driven in the City, as is the lot size. Shc felt That people wanted die large houxs built nn the small Intl because they did not have the lime to take care of a larger lot. Commissioner Chitica .amted pan of that may be we, and pan of it wmdd be to realirc the most profit from the land by the developer, but Ihat ideas may change. Shc sated that the developers have contimwlly wanted to build larger and larger homes, so when the Commission approved some of the smaller lots, the idra was to provide a mix of horsing with a smaller home Iwing built nn the smaller lot. She asked when should the Commission stare, saying Ihcy have a policy that a certain number of houses in a tract should have a smaller footprint, and felt the Commission nreded a policy from me Council nn the appmprateness in moving in that direction. Commissioner Vallette 54ned currently what Ihcy see arc two-story homes on veq~ minimal Intl, which just scans as a uay of amassing housing pnxluct. ~t:nrr Stout fch the kind of housing they arc Acscribing is being built in a nombr-r of communities in the area, and fch the mason Rancho Cncamnnga was successful with that type of home as opposed to the others is because Rant hn Cucamonga providas n more community orien~sd philosophy in their planning, sn instead o(concenUating a Int of clfnrt into the lot itself dory have put a lot of effort into the cnvinmmcnt around it. 'Rey arc seeing the rceuhs o(that philosophy, and he did not fat That was necessarily bad. He agreed with Commi.asioner Mclchcr drat the Eliw;mda Specific Plan did not do what anyone wanted it to do. It was ton dcnsc for a country atmosphere, but not dcnsc enough for the developers, and that was why it ttid not work. City Council/Planning Commission Joint Meeting Minutes January 29, 1992 Page 3 Councilmember Alexander asked if the Commission was just concerned with the Etlwanda area Commissioner Mclcher stated no, but that is what gave rise to the question. He stated the Commission had discussed that there were things they could do with their ordinances w create a Icss dense look, but it would push house sizes down which might create a product that fhe market does not want. He felt Mayor Stout's comments W ere hdpfid. Commissioner Valleuc statcA she was concerned because she secs a pattern developing where the developers arc using the maximum lot coverage with minimum set-backs, and in some vacts that is Irving only enough room between drivcwnys for one car to park. Shc did not feel That was good for the community, and would not be pmvideag them with a yuality cnvironmenL M:p~or Stout felt they should not misinterpret what he said, that he believed Ihcre were opportunities to come up with dif(erent!ypes of product or set-backs, ete., to achieve a different type of look. C'ouncilmember Williams Thought there were very few small houses available in the community and felt they would sell quickly if built. Shc slated she would like m encourage the developers to have a mix ofhousing styles. Commissioner Chides stated Ney coulA Ao That but i[ would be very different from their previous direction, and felt They needed to Nseuss This befom making any big changes. Councilmember Wright stated she would like to see something different, that she did not like the look of row boating, but felt the lot size was really the issue and how The cost of land in the Cily affected that Shc felt (hose were Planning Commission itsuos, and that when a developer comes witA a plan, They could see that there is variety in the design. C'ouncilrncmix+r Williams felt if someone was creative, they could Iwvc the density but still achieve a different look hclw'ccn uniLS. Mayor Slow smled one problem with having a single story house was that it would need a larger footprint and would not fit nn some of the lot Sizes. Cnuncilmcmber Williams felt them wcrc people who were looking for quality homes that wcrc not necessarily large in nivc. Mayor Slaw felt dsu in past Acvclopments, the single-story houses wcrc tha last to sell when mixed wish Iwo-story basses. He thought maybe it wwlA he 6cttcr to have a development of just single-story homes instead of vying m mix them. Chairman A7cN icl smtcd the Commission has t>ecn discussing (hc feasibility of rcyuiring a small pcrccntagc of a Accclnpment to be single-story. (ic fch as far as lot size, you could have the same problem with a 7,IXp square font Ins 2s you would wish a 3,(xl(h5,(KK) square font lot, in tertn5 of side yard, or having one flat straight wall m tarty dte Inad since it is the cheapest meu5nd of construction. He smted the Commission was in a yuandary on whether rn s41rt demanding «tmesiogle-(amity houses in a vacs, or a whole Vaet of single-story houses, or whether iI was even a ¢cxxi idcn or nnl. Commissioner Chilicn staled the concern was if if was Ik1ler Io put single-family drenched homes nn small 1015 or m have the same number of units clustered in multi-family dcvclopmcnts, because there wcrc very Aiffcrcnl philosophical trends involved with Mnh. Shc stated there were also some differences of opinion in the Commission tin what is appmprinm m have adjacent m the Irceway and that it will maintain its yuality. City Council/1'lanning Commission Joint Meeting Minutes January 29, 1992 Page 4 Brad Buller, City Planner, stated every year the Commission works on its work program, and for Nc first time Ncy arc seeing a lot of traces built in Nis grander style that appear very cramped. Also, Nere has been a mspite in applications for singlbfamily developments, and Ncy Iclt mw was a good time to raise Nis issue. They wanted to make Ne Council aware Nat Ney will 6e dealing wiN Nis issue more during Ne next year, and on defining how Ne product should fn into the sueetscape. Conncilmember Williams asked if they were making sum Nat developers were designing ways N access RV parking in dtc bxk yard. Ctmirtnan McNicl smted Ncy arc looking at requiring 15% as a reasonable amount Brad Buller, City Planner, sated Ne new dirccdon would be w get as many homes as possible desigced N allow RV parking in Nc bxk yard. Chairman McNicl stated Ne vend will probably be to go to some single-story units and pulling in of Ne side yard, which will bring down Ne sale price of Ne house, so there will probably be developers who come to Ne Council m complain. The Council and Commission discussed various styles and ways of introducing single-story homes into Ne community. rrrrr» B2. COMMISSION RE Commissioner Melchor slated in Ne design Review process. Ne Commission concentrates on Ne community face of a project, what people sec when they drive by places Ncy might not normally go into. He smtul wiN a public project that will be u.ced by Ne citrons of Ne community, he Nought all of No space within that projcet should also he subject to review, His Nought was Nat Ne City's projects would benefit by increasing Ne Planning Commission's involvement in Ne development of Them. He Celt design involved a lot more other Nan Nc snpcrBC.ial coaling of Nc building. Mayor Stout stated the Council hat had concerns about Nis issue. He stated i(a someone wants to build something, they have architects and engineers to help interpret Ncir davres as Ne owner imo a building, but Ne bottom line is that the owner is Ne customer, and still owns Nc building and is involved in the process. He fch that on City prnjectt, the Council, acting as Nc repremnmtives of Ne community, would be considered the cusmmer and Nus .ahould he mom involved in Nc project. He slated the way Nc process is Set up now, past a certain point Ne Council has oat been as involved as he Ihouglu Ncy should be as Ne cutl0mer. Commissioner Mclchcr klt the Council, or a subcommiuec of Ne Council, should he involved and prevent each time the Nlnnning Commission is considering a public project, and have equal input into the process. Cnuncilmcmhrr Williams felt Ncy could set a policy on Nis in mMion very catily. CnuncihnemMr Wright smted in the past they have always smyai ma o(a project when it goes to the Planning Camminsien, and at that point is when dtey have tell out of eonvol of the project. Savor Stout suuM Ncy needed to be uamful txYause Ne Planning Commission is appointed by Ne Council, sn Ncy ^annnt Ix invnlval in a double dealing simatinn where they ore not getting :m hnncat opinion tram the Commission. City Council/Planning Commission Joint Mcedng Minutes January 29, 1992 Page 5 Councilmember Wright agreed, and (ch it they went with a team approach, then input could be given from both sides early on so everyone could understand why certain conclusions are reached. Councilmember W illiams concurmd. Commissioner Chides felt that from the Planning Commission side, i(Ncy wem involved earlier on in the design process, they might have an opportunity to suggest appropriate a curative changes b;fore it was too late. The Council and Commission discussed how some o(Ne major public buildings have been designed and ezmuteA recently. Mayor Stout felt having a subcwnmittee involved in the process would be good, with mpons to Ne toll Council on a regular basis. Chairman McNiel sated Nc reason Nis item was on the agenda was baause the Planning Commission is rarely involved in interior space design (or any of Ne facilities, and felt if Ncy had a subcommittee also, Ncy might be able to make suggestions on more efficient uses of the space. Councilmember Alexander felt it was all right to raise questions, but they had to keep in mind that nciNer Ne Council nor Commission were space efficiency experts. Chairmmt McNiel agreed and surfed Nis would not supersede any consulting group h'ved for thatpurpose. Commissioner Melchor Stated Ney just wanted to M able to questions or challenge, to make sure the experts arc doing whst wat rvccdW. rr~+~• [13 Commissioner Vallcttc stated she had requested Nis item in ordu to give a brie update to the Council from Nc Planning Commission's perception. She stated on January 27, 1991, she and Commissioner Tolstoy attended a meeting wiN Councilmembers Ruqucl and Williams, Caloans mpresentatlves and City staff. She stated a lot of cnnccros were discussed, and felt Ncy had n bcucr pwspxtive now as to what to expect from the freeway. She slated hmdscaping issues, clevauw of Ne (reway, flood control channels, and sound attenuation walls were some o(Ne topics discussed. Shc snstcd Ne Planning Commission's subcommittee for Route 30 opemtcs under direction of the Cmmcil and the policy set by Council. Shc felt it was important to have the Commission's subcommittee continue, Mcause she could sec Ne freeway affecting future projects afmr Ne discussions wiN Caltmns, such as Ne umnd aucmwtion walls. She asked i(thc Council desired any input by or about Ne Commission's subcommittee, nr i(Ncy had any questions. Councilmember Williams sated it wvas an ezecllent meeting, and asked staff what was the decision on Ne sound aucnuatlon walls. Ilnul huller, City Planner, sLatM sniff undershx>d Nat Caloans wns now requiring more acccpmnce nn Ne walls, sn salt was gmng u> pursue the issue with Caloans to get some type o(pnhcy in writing from Nem. Mayor Stout sLSte+I the City needed to come up wiN some way m pay for Ne walls up fmm to ensure they could pay lirr them when C'aluans works nut all o(their rcquiremenLS, incase Ne state no longer has the (ands m pay for Nem. City Council/Planning Commission Joint Meeting Minwes January 29,1992 Page 6 Thc Council and Commission discussed the current understanding o(the sound attenuation rcquiremenLS by Caltrans Chairman McNiel stated the Commission's subcommittce was set up m keep the Commission aware of changes involved in the freeway so Ihcy would know how to handle projects that were adjacent m ih not to help design iL Mayor Stout stated one problem they are having now is that the City is being prcssurerJ into making daisions about infraswcturc that is adjacem to the freeway, m that when they condition a developer b do something in that area, hcause Calhans has not set atieir work for the frceway yet, the City is having to excuse developers fmm their conditions. He stated they need to be awam of these things and keep communication open. Councilmcmbcr Williams stated the agreement was to have meetings with Caltrans on a regular basis about the freeway. rrrrrr &1. STA IS OF REGIONA Drad huller, City Planner, smted this was brought up because the Commission has not seen much of the design smtus of the mall lately. Commissioner Mclcher stated (here is some coneem that the Agency is moving along wi(h plans for site developmem at a vcmendous invesanent of money, and the developers of the mall appear to be giving the impression of holding o(f until the last minute for appmval of the design, where the City will be pmsscd to making an approval just to keep Uings moving. He thought the Commission would like assurances that the developer is Icing reminded to allow plenty of time in their schedule for design mview. :Mayor Stout staled it is common (or a developer b come in m the last moment (or a mall project, and they could not really control drat. He thought the Commission needed to commit to the idea that this project will need a tremendous amount of attention in a very shoe dme span, That they would not be able to go through the normal process, and might have to delay some other projects in order to get this one done in a timely manner when it was submitted. He felt sm(f has pushed the developer to keep the City appraised o(the progress, which has not always hnppencd in summnding ciders. Commissioner Chitica smlGl they did expect some changes based on the Iluidity of the project, but slated they have hccn waiting (or mom than a year and a half for another meeting on the wnceplual design. 4faynr Smut smtcA it will be n chat lenge m the Commission when the developer says they arc ready m go, and he felt they would have m work out design issues as quickly as possible, shat there will not be the luxury of dme for review, and that they will have to do the bast they ran umlera lot of pressure. rrxrrr R5. AISCSI$SION OF HEMS OP M ITItAI (J'1"F FST Chninnan McNiel staled the Commission has been approached fora (rreway sign for a shopping center. He slated they have approximately six oplxlnunities for freeway signs, and as the requcsLS comp in, each development will feel Thal their sign needs to he gr:mder than the last one. He asked what was the Council's opinion on freeway signs. City Council/Planning Commission Joint Meeting Minutes Ianuary 29, 1992 Page 7 lack Lam, City Manager, stafcd when the sign ordinance wac developed, the issue of freeway signs was discussed but there was no development in that area yet, sn it was agreed that Jtc City would deal with freeway signs when that time arrived. He smterl them was rw deLVled discussion on how large, or how many users should be on one, etc, He slated there was also a provision placed in the ordinance for regional shopping centers drat when the site was approved, the sign would be by special approval of the Planning Commission. Chairman McNiel felt that frceway signs have been misused in other communities and he did not want m sec that happen in Rancho Qtramonga. Mayor Stout stated the primary purpose of a sign is to benefit the public by allowing Ihem to find what they are looking for, but he felt they also ncedcd to keep the signs tasteful and of a reasonable size. Fle also felt they needed to be reasonable as far as how many businesses Ihcy allow to be listed on the sign. Councilmember Williams felt That people could determine what type of smaller stores were in a center based upon the majors, and felt it would be all right for the major slates to have their names on a sign but no[ every store in the center. Brad Buller, City Planner, sated that each shopping center had the right w requests sign program. He stated that in the case of Foothill Marketplace, iLc onenmtion to the freeway was such that it would not have good visibility m the traffic nn the frceway, so they wanted m be sure to have a sign that served them. The Council and Commission discussed the types of signs they would like w see on the frceway as far as structure and acslhcdca. The Council and Commission discussed the selection process used in Rancho Cucamonga to select Planning Commission meml+ers, and contorted that it was good the way it was x~ith general selection by the entire Council as npptxM to each Councilmember wlecting one Commissioner. .Mayor Stout sorted he would like the Commission and Council to lx concerned with envisioning things they would like In tic in the community ten or fifmcn years from now. He felt with all the alteration they have had to pay to current affairs, thcrc has not always been time for looking ahead. Flt sated his feelings slcm from the rcalizauon of how long it lakes to accomplish something, so if you did not Stan planning rmw (or future projaLS, they might no[ ever happen. rW~~. tack Lam, Gty Manager, slated there was the possihility for a grant application, and in order to submit the application, a resnlutimt would need to he appoved to allow the City to apply (or the grant. .Mayor Smm salted in order w adA an emergency item to the agenda, it would need the affirmative von of all ('nunal members prcunt. S101'IO\': Movat by Wright, seconded by Alexander to add an Envin>nmenlal Enhancement anA Mitigation Program for Grant As~ie4ance item In the agenda. Mndcal cartied unanimously, 4-0-I (Baguet ahsenQ. l~ySdmtnlZ}vl_ I~i~~SNECESSARYFORTI{1~OLIPLETIONOFTIIGPROJGC~ City Council/Planning Commission Joint Mectlng Minutes Ianuary 29, 1992 Page 8 RESOLUTION N0.92-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TF{E APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SECTTON 164,5fi OF THE STREE'T'S AND HIGHWAYS CODE 1989 FOR THE ROCHESTER AVENUE -RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIiGH SCHOOL MITIGATION PROGRAM MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 92-018. Motlon carried unanimously, 4-0.1 (Ruquc[abseaQ. w+trr• No communications were made fiom the public. •+.+wr MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to adjourn. Motlon rarticd unanimously, 4-0-1 (Btpuet absent). Thc meeting adjourned at 9:I5 p.m. Respectfully submi«cd, lan Sulton Deputy City Clerk Approved by Planning Commission: Febmary 26, 1992 Approved by City Camcil; Fehrua:y 5, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA CITY COUN CSL MINUTES Reoular Meet inc A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held on Wednesday, February 5, 1992, in the council chambers of zhe civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Ca camonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p, m. by Mayor Dennis L. 5*_out. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Bu qu et II, Diane Will iam9, Pamela J. Wright (aYrived 7:27 p.m.), and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manage[; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry e. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community pevelopment DirecCOr; Tarry Smith, Park Planning/Development Superintendent; Drad Duller, City Planner; Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Jim Harris, Associate Engineer; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst IZ; Susan Mickey, Managemert Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection D.i strict; and Debra J. Adams, City C1er k. B ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS R1. Pre SentaCion of 30-year Service Pin to Historic Preservation Commissioner Melicent Arne r. Mayor Stout presentetl Historic Pf eseY Vat i.en Commissioner Melicent Arner with her 30-year service pin. S2. Mayor stoat anncu nced that Rancho Cucamonga would be featured on Channel 9 on March 21, d: 30 a.m. on Melody Rodgers' Show which is abouC new communities. 03. Jack Lam, city Manager announced that Item b9 has a substitute Resolution because ti.e one in f.he packet was missing words. eM1. Jack Lam, City Manager, announced that the title of Ordinance No. 483 listed under Consent ordinances is incor.eect, that the correct title has been di.StY ibuted to the Council. • • ~ x + + City Council Minutes February 5, 1992 Page 2 C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Minutes: December 18, 1991 January 2, 1992 (Williams, Wright absent) January i5, 1992 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/15/92 and 1/22/92; and Payroll ending 1/2/92 and :/16/92 for the total amount of $2,241,429.64. 03. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off sale Eeer 6 Wine for The New Mexico Connection, Arlyn C. zipp, 1153) Birth 5tzeet, Spot E-1. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for 21" Off-sale General for The Price Cluh, The Price Company (P-12), South Side of Foothill Boulevard and Et iwanda Avenue. D5. Approval of the Basketball Hardcou rt Retrofit Project and the authorization to advert See the ^NOt ice Inviting Bids^ and Co appropriate the necessary £u nde for Account Numbers 31-3901-585/Revenue and 3i-4532-8810/ Expenditure. RESOLUTION NO. 92-019 A RESOLUTS ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND BPECIFICATLONS FOR Ti3E "eASRE TBALL HARDCOVRT RETROFIT PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CI'T'Y CLE P.R TO ADVEATI5E AND ftECF.I VE BIDS D6. Approval to extend ComcasC Cabie T.V. franchise. RF.S OLUTIOf] NO, 91-Oi2G A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPI RAI'I ON OF CU P.REDT iICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA D]. Approval of appropriation from the Self-Insurance reserve. D8. Approval nE the City's portion for Pcofessieral Services for the Fines and Forfeitures La»suit in the amount of $2,03].00, to be funded from Account No. 01- 42fi5-6028. City Council Minutes February 5, 1992 Page 3 D9. Approval of County of San Bernardino, Department of Environmental Health Services, Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) retlesignat ion for the enforcement of state and local minimum st andarde for solid waste operations. RESOLUTION NO. 92-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG A, CALIFORNIA, REDESIPNATING THE SAN BERNAHDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES AS THE LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY D10. Approval of Time Exte r.sion for desiynat ion of a portion of cottonwood Way as a private et rest and exempting the abutting properties from requirements set forth in Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal code subject to certain spec if is conditions. RESOLUTION NO. 92-021 A AE SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCE70 CUCAMONGA, CALIFOANI A, APPROVING TT ME E%TENSION FOR THE DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF COTTONWOOD WAY AS A PRIVATE BTP.EET AND E%EMPTING THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES FROM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CORE SUBJECT TO CEATA IN CONDITIONS ^11. Approval to execute a Subordination Agreement for Wiliam R. and Dona C. Aarnes, for their property, located at 12715 Summit Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 92-022 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM WILLIAM R. AND DONA C. BARNES AND AUTHORIZING THF, MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SANE D 12. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extene ion for Tract 12332^2, located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Tackatem Placa, submitted by M.J. Brock. RF,S OhUTION NO. 92-023 P. RESOLUTION OF T.HE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CP.LTPORNIA, APPPOVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT G\TENSION AND IMPROVEME;lT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12332-2 D13. Approval to execute Improvement Aq reeme nt Extension Eor Tract 13063, located on the east side of F,a st Avenue between Highland Avenue and Victoria Street, submitted by Citation Builders. City Council Minutes February 5, 1992 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 92-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT 5£CVRITY FOR TFEACT 13063 D14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13281 Landscape, located on the northwest corner of Rase Line Aoad and Rochester Avenue, submitted by the William Lyon Company. AESOLVTION NO. 92-025 A PEGOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURI T° FOR TRACT 13281 LANDSCAPE 015. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13565-5 thru -10, located on the nnrthe ast corner of Summit Avenue and Wardman eulloCk Road, submitted by Standard Pacific. RESOLUTION NO. 92-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALTFOANI A, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SE CUAITY FOA TRACT 13565-5 THRU -30 D16. Approval to execute Improvement A9re ement Extension foc Tza ct 13664, located on the east aitle of Haven Avenue north of Church Street, submitted by Lewis Homee. RESOLUTION t:0. 92-C27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CYTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY F'OR TRACT 13664 D17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13851, located on the northeast corner of Wilson Avenue and Canistel Avenue, aubm fitted by Pacific international Development. R£GOLVTION NO. 92-028 A RF.S GLUT ION OF THE CITY COU NCII. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAY.ONG A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSZON AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13851 D18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extena ion for Tract 14121, located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue, submitted by J.P. Rhoades Devel cement. City Council Minutes February 6, 1992 Page 5 RESOLUTION N0. 92-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECVRITY FOR TRACT 14121 D19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for bR 89-21, located on the northeast corner of Spruce Avenue and White oak Avenue, submitted by Great Western Hotels, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 92-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNTA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ACREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECUAI TY FOR DA 89-21 b20. Approval to accept Impcovementa, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13565 - 24th Street Improvements, located on 24th Street between Wardman 0ullock Aoad and San Seva ins Avenue. Release: Fa it nful Performance Bond (Street) $]38,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ ]3,800.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92-03I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13565 - 24TH STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D21. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 9897, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. Heledse Faithful Performance Bonds: Elm Avenue $ 90,000. 00 Town Center $274,000. 00 Terra Vista Pa rkwav $103,000. 00 Storm Drain $157,110. 00 Church Street $40],600. 00 Accept Maintenance Guarantee Ro r.d s: Elm Avenue $ 9,000. 00 Ta,:_ Center S 27,300. 00 Terra_V_sa Packwav S 10,300. 00 S M rm Drain 5 15,711. 00 Church Street $ 40,760. 00 City Council Minutes February 8, 1997. Page 6 RESOLUTION No. 92--32 A RESOL'J TLON OF THE CITY COU[iC IL Op 'PHE GI TY OF RANCHO gUCAMONGA, CALIFORtJIA, ACCEPTSPIG Th^n PUHLiC IMPROVEMENTS FOA PARCEL MRP 5897 A}JQ AUTHORI2ING THE £I LING OF R NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE h'ON.X -22. APprovat to accept improvements, Release of Bonds ar,d Noe ice of Camplet ion for Parcel Map 13030 - Traffic Signa is, located an Haven Avenue and Town Center nr ive and Sprvce Avenue and Town Center Drive. Release Faithful Performance 3onds (Signals): Haven S 2bwn Center 5 93,500.00 S rg uce_& Toorn Centex S 82.500.00 RE50L-TION NO. 92-033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CSTY CO U:+^_IL OF' THE CiTX OF RANCHO CUCFMONGA, CRLI FORNIA, ACCE PTS7JG THR PllBLIC IMPRGVE`M1ENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 11030 - TRA FFSC SIG 7JAL5 ACI- AU TV40RI2ING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLET TOt7 FOR THE WOAY, -23. Approval to zelease t:a ineenance cu araM ee bond for Tract 13823, located an the couch side of Lemon Avenue ceti.aen Harsac Placa and Sem illcn Place. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bor. c` (Street) S 6,300.00 -24. Approval to accept the Corporate Yard Improvement Project, located at 9I53 Ninth Street, Contract CO BS-172, as cempleta and au`.horiae the City Engineer to file a "Notlca of Compl etien." RESOLUTION NO. 92-034 A A,ESOLUTI OtS OF THE CSTY CO;I:;CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOA:JI A, ACCEPTING THE PUALSC IMPROVEMENTS FOR T3{E CORPORATE YARD IMPR GVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT CO 88-172, AND AUTHOATZS N+ THE FILING OF A irOT1CE JF CON.FLB'iSON FOR THE WORN MOT TON: Moved by Alexander, s¢conded dy Huquet to approve the Consent Calendar as corrected (change to Reaolutior, No, 92-020). Motion :are ied unanimously, 4-0- 1 (tJright absent). E,_., _._COHSENT Oft OIHANCES El. PEVI E'd OF' C"P?`;.CJT C.°Y, _RF ,y LA °7 OIU5 __A FFY'C7~_t_G STOS?IG~PS. T_tD.PAP.N.ING OF FiP ~-ATIU JAI_ 1~'[r' SO,I, .~itt Y, RFf LI F~hi IAI PRU; FR7 ic;i Cgbra J. Ad an's, :':';% C7vrk, read the liC 1c! of Ordinance No. 483. City Council Minute9 February 5, 1992 Page 7 ORDINANCE NO. 483 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COVN CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 17.08.070-F SO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARRING AND STORAGE WI T.H IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS MOTTONi Moved by Williams, seconded by Buquet to waive full re adinq and approve Ordinance No. 4H3. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Nright absent), F. ADVERTISED PUDLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSN.ENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the street System Map of the Et iwanda Specific Plan to change the portion of Miller Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue an East Avenue from a Collector to a Secondary Arterial. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Staff report presented by Jim Harris, Associate Engineer. Mayon Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 4R3. ORDINANCE NO. 484 (first read inq) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCSL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AP PP.OVI NG ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90 -01, TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN STREET SYSTEM MAP TO CHANCE THE PORTION of MILLER AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE FROM A COLLECTOR TO A SECONDARY ARTERIAL AND MA ICI NG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 404. Motion ca rz ied unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). MOTION: Moved by Eu quet, seconded by Alexander to set seta nd reading of Ordinance No. 484 tar February 19, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wrrght absenCl. e'2. CQN_'UENnTION 1'Q VAGATF, AN ALL F._Y LOCATED SOOTH OF NINTH STREET FROM VI NMAR TO SIERRA N.A DR E',.A VENUE,S Staff report. presented by Dunne Ha ker, Assistant to the City Menage r. Mayor Stovt opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Clty Council WeLQ: City Council Mirutes- February 5, 1992 Page A Mark Hernandez, 8251-1/2 9th Street, objected to the alley being closed because he uses it to get access to his house. Aubrey Campbell, lives on south side of the alley, stated Mr. Hernandez' aunt +.s in favor of closing the alley. There heing no further response, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Stout presented background information on this matter and how it happened to cone before the City Council. He stated he supported the Resolution because of the public safety issue involved. He felt this would help to make this area safer. AESOLUTI ON NO. 92-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'l HE CLTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN ALLEY LOCATED SOUTH OF NINTH STREET FROM VINMAR TO SIERRA MADRE AVENUES MOTION: Moved by Buqu et, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92-035. Motion carried unan imouely, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). Councilmember Wright arrived at 7:27 p.m. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. R. CITY MANAOER'3 STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION OF A PRR-APPLICATION AF.VIEW PROCESS - A request of the joint City Council/Planning Commission Svbc omm it tee to approve a Fre-Application Review process. Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Councilmember Buqu et felt it was an improv=meat over what the City had beECre now. MOTIOIi: Mo vod by Alexander, seconded by wrig ht to approve the Pre-Application Rev ie~a Process. Motion carried unanimou Fl:y, 5-0. city Council Minutes February 5, 1992 Page 9 H2. CONS IDERA^aION OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOtID REDVCTION FOA TRACT 12462. LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMN.IT AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANOA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE SVEMITTED EY FIRST FAMILY HOMES Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to approve staff's recommendation and that First Family Homes matters hereafter be placed on the Consent Calendar for the future when applicable. Motion carried unanimously, 4-1 (euquet no). H3. CISCUSSION OF MOBILE HOME. ACCORD REN EhW=L Staff report presented by James Markman, City Attorney, who stated this whole prccess is to provide protection for people who live in mobile home parks. He stated the Accord came about in 1963. Ne stated staff has been working with the owners and the tea idente to reach an agreement for several me nt h5 now. He felt an Accord could provide more protection than an Ordinance becauss of current case law. Mr. Markman stated there are four issues being dealt wtt h: 1. Amount of cost of living index to be passed through 2. Capital pass-throw ghe for the mobile home parks 3. Rent equalization 4. Volu nary vacancy decontrol Ile stated he felt an Accord would beet protect the residents James Markman, city Attorney, stated there were alternatives to be considered in resolving this, but that if it cannot be resolved, and the Council does want to afford the protection, the way to do this would be to set up a rent control system Eor mobile home parks within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. He et ated it weu ld take a study in order to set this up to get the facts about an ordinance. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the Aac ord ie effective until tonight and that staff needs direction from the City Council on what to do next on this matter. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council were: Hatry Pate, Alta Laguna Mobile lbme Pan'k, stated they have been working with the park wm ers and City sta Ef on renewing the Accord. He stated if they can't yet the Accord renewed, then they would want an Ordinance. He continued by telling about the negotiating process they have gone through with t. he owners. He stated tL'ry felt the park ownezs are being unreasonable and that they can raise the rents to any amount they want to. He presenter) the City Attorney, James Markman, with an Ordinance which was from the City of San Bernardino. Mayor Stout asked that the ordinance be marked as Exhibit "1" Cicy Council Minutes February 5, 1992 Page 30 Jre Huesa, Casa Volante Mobile Home Park, felt the CPI should be changed to a rate of 758 of the CPI. He felt increases should not be more than 98. He continued to tell about previous rent increases pet Che CPI and the hardship it has on the mob lle home residents. Martin Enriquez, Sycamore Mobile Home Park, talked about the pass-throughe fcr the mcbile home parks, antl felt the owners should set aside money to be able to do the imprcvement items. He felt the owners wanted a 1-1/28 gift which they would not have Co show ary accountability for. He at at ed he felt the south side of the wall around his mobile home park needs to be repaired or replaced. crack Pfifer, Alea Vista N.ob ile Home Park, spoke on reserves and Felt capital improvements should be done from profits from the reserves. Jean Ganemlan, Pines Mobile Home Park, talked about tent increases and an equalization pia n. She stated she did not agree with Che City ana the owners' plan far equ al izac io n. She stated the residents want affordable housing- Bill Near y, Pines N.ob ile Home Park, talked about affordable housing needs. He presented statistics on the type of people that live in mobile home parks. He slated they would like an extension of the Accord or a rent at abilizat ion Ordinance. Roland erindameur, Chaparral Mobile Home Park, epo ke on city fins ncee. He stated he felt it hard Co understand how Che City can spend money on the many projects in the City and not on the mobile home resident a. He asked fur the city council to consider their needs. Howard Chapman, Chaparral Mobile No;.e Park, stated the City Council has a decision to make with va rioua options to choose from. He felt the City Council should renew the Accord with Chs accep eance of the residents and owners or enact an Ordinance. lack WS.l liams, Ramona Vllla Mobile Home Park, at ated the owners have stated they get 30A profit from the rents collecCed. He at at ed many people cannot pay For any rent increases. He did not feel the park owners would lose. He stated the residents felt pros eu red from the City and the owners. He stated there are ewo major issues still to be worked out between the owners and the residents: 1. CPI amount, 2. Rent equalization increase He continued to talk abut the negotiations and Che compromises they came to with the owners. He fe1C the Cicy Council should eu oport the Accord. Dee Murray asked For the City Council to help the mobile home residents City Council Minutes February 5, 1992 Page 11 Valerie cra iyer, Alta Vista Mobile Home Park, stated the mobile home residents cannot afford a rest increase. Marilyn Filmore, Pines Hob ile Home Park, commented on the amount she has spent on her home. Beverly Mahu 11 a, Finance Manager uE Mobile Home Industry, commented on repossessed mobile homes and mobile home Bales. Roxanne Hernandez felt rent contr cl was important in order for the residents to have a chance to stay in the City eo that their children can continue going to school in Aancho Cucamonga. Bill Sch~: einfurth, Director operations, Alta Laguna Hob ile Home Park, felt staff and the City Attorney's office have made a great effort in trying to resolve this. He stated they have made many proposals to resolve the problems. He at at ed they have never received a proposal from the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Ne stated Alta Laguna owners would accept the Accord and the sharing of improvement costs. He coot inusd to state that with the leer proposal presented, they would accept everythiny except going lower than 100E of the CPI. tie stated they would like to have another Accord. He continued to state that even without the Accord they would continue to be reasonable with the residents of Alta Laguna. Howard 5ummerland, Chaparral Mobile Home Park Management, stated they have not threatened the City with a law su if.. He atat ed they do want to get this resolved. He stated with ChB recent fax he received, he would accept it with the exception of the BOB CPI figure. John Davis, Director of Operations Sycamore Vi11a Mobile Home Park, Brat ed they do not have a reserve to do capital improvements. He stated they would agree with staff's proposal datetl 1-30-92 except for the CPI figure. Jim Ma hache k, Attorney far Pines Mobile Home Park, stated he was not here to threaten the City with a lawsuit, but told of the rights of the owners. He felt the Accord was better than a rent control law. He stated they wou Ld nor accept at aff's proposal of 1-30-92 as a package, but would accept some of the things contained in it. Drad Downey, Casa Volante, spoke on vacancy tlecont rol and named all the jurisdictions that have this. Jack Williams, Hamona Vi11a Mobile Home Park, made comm rants as to some of the owners, comments. Bill SchweinEu a h, Director Oper a'. ions, Atta La quna N.obile Home Park, felt eve ryore should let staff know iE they would accept the 1-30-92 proposal or not, and that this should be done on paper. Jean Ganem ian, Pines Mobile Name Park, asked if the City Council has seen the packet submitted to the City Council on 1-28-92. Ci*_y Cou nc<1 Minutes February 5, 1992 Page 12 Hinds naniels, ^eputy City Manager, stated the information was presented to the City Council in matrix form. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Alexander stated it appears to him that the owners and the residents are still willing to work on the differences. He stated the fact of tY,zeatened litigation does not worry him, but the fact that it miyht do more harm than gootl to the situation does bother him. Its stated he would like to see an extension of the Accord so ne 9ot sat ions can go forth. Councilmember Wright stated if the Accord is not signed, the residents would not be protected. She felt there was an indication that both aides are willing to cor.t inue negotiations. She stated she is hesitant to leave the teaidenta unnxotected. She felt it negotiations are going on that a moratorium be declared on an emergency basis that would protect the residents until negotiations are completed. She felt this would give both parties the opportunity to negotiate, but for the City Attorney to draft some kind of an Ordinance so that if a conclusion cannot be reached, it could come back to the Council to do whatever needs to be done. Councilmember Buquet stated he felt that a compromise could be reached if both groups work on the issues. He felt the residents would benefit more from an Accord. counciimember Williams stated she agreed with Councilmember Buquet and stated if somethiny cou la not 6e worked out after an extension that the City Council step in and take an emetgency action. Councilmember Alexander stated it both parties are willing to work further on this, he would be there to help out. Mayor 5t out stated he did not think r,he residents could go unproeected. Ne felt everyone needed to get together and work on this, but felt that they would all not come away Cotally happy. He stated he would support an ordinance, but did not feel that would really help the residents. He felt negot iatione ahoultl continue. Councilmember Huquet agreed tfiat everyone needs to get together, Eace to face, and work the issues through. James Markman, City Attorney, suggested that the Council authorize the Mayor to execute an extension of the Accord up to 90 days, staff Co continue neo_otiatione wi.Ch the residents and owners, and for the City Manager to prepare an RFR to perform a reces=dry study that would support the enactment of an ordinance should negotiations Ea il. MOT?ON: Movers by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to accept the City Attor ney'e rec n;;une ndation. Mnt. icn carried 4-1 (Wright nod. City Council Minutes February 5, 1992 Page i3 COUncilmember Wright stated she was votir'^ no because she still did not believe that the residents were left protected from at least int imidat ior, because there ie ro moratorium, Accord signed, just direction to try to get one, and she also wasn't sure that a study was what needs to be done to prove the need because she felt the need hatl already been proved. Mayor Stout stated he felt the study was needed so that if there was an ordinance, it would be one that woa ld stand up in a court of law. Cou ncilmsmber euqu et felt everyt hirg should be done correctly rega rdiny this. James Markman, City Attorney, stated Jeff King never intended to make the statement that the City Attorney's office is intimidated by presenting an ordinance, if in Eact the facts support it, He stated the City Attorney's office would prey ent an Ordinance to the City Council and would be happy to do eo in order to take the law as Ear as it can to protect the residents in their opinion. Aerec ess was taken at 9:55 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at i0:13 p. m. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS No items submitted. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NE1!T MEETING J1. count ilmember Williams asked that the Mayor's term come hack to the Council fo: discussion ae m whether it should be on the ballot to make it a four year term. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM TRF. PUALIC K1. REQUEST FROM PAI MO MORALES, RANCHO LITTLE LEAGUE, FOA WAIVER OF CITY REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTCOOR STORAGE Staff report presented by Aick Gomez, Community D evelcpment Director. Pr imo Morales asked the City Council to allow them h.o place the cargo containers en the land owned by the Water District. Mayor Stout asked Mr. Moralee what hi, long range plan was for the container a. Mr. Morales stated he has a contract with the Water District for five years which is renewable once a year. City Council Minutes February 5, 1992 Page 14 Discussion took place ae to the planting of *,: ees being a requirement in order to hide the storage bin e. Councilmember Buquet Eelt this might be a problem for vandalism because of similar situations he has seen in other cities. councilmember Buquet felt he should talk to the school about a location for the bins. Staff stated they have not yet talked to the school. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated he would work with Mr. Morales and the School District to work out a location for the bins. Mayor Stout suggestetl they start with the CUP process now so that Mr. Morales ie not held up any longer than necessary. ACTION: Staff to work with Mr. Morales and the School Gistr ict in order to place the containers on the school Bite, but to also go ahead with the CUP process. L. ADJOURNMENT Cou ncilmember Alexander stated due to the death of Mr. Joe DiIOCio, he would like to request that the ceunc it adjourn in his memory. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to adjourn in the memory of Mr. Joe DiIor io. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 10:64 p.m. Respectfully au bm fitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Appr'o ved: iNP tFm i~M1 a0O 9Nu .; \: O~ .ii iii ° m a obOC~p np°NNNV O ryN riooaeoo.~r i~ rio~aiioe~ m ~+ y m M1 •a0 M1 a eamw n v N wwV ~ ~ mm~w NN n n n n .Y^ •n.111n•n iPOy maNe NmaNwn~yNmaN eI~~P°nnmanwn °aPOOOOaaoasaaaaaaaaaaasvaessaaaaoasvasvossssssss ma. ................ aaaaa.aa.a.. ...... o ~ooooawwwawwweewowawewwaweoe<wwwwawwwwweewweowwwweww > 1 1 s N V M1e • e w e VwM1w aYl M ~ O V i N W M1W WZY6l~ :w P _ O u ,w w V V° aJN WJ~N(M SJW v vNlnyViVn ( NJl_W( WyW DM1 \N\W llW i~ w~ iVO°v hJl JryZ hJ N _VJN Nw\N ? NaNOCM1ON W JNOONV~, \LLO u .°li e...Wi.WwJO'~a ieD"(l n iiiw r.iW~ vz s~ii. i wOViW°WLL M1~ ?D~J FwOh ~l Nx..zz°sN ( M1i °VDN (( JNM1WtiVitJVli>OJmi O WNFVWZ°Z w\ p2'wi° D( O RCZW WiiO>Nw~ u w N Il(RW¢~NIJVwlIiVNHJ WiFZ 2(p( MYVNF N`yV = 7_V_ OnOew NW~JYM:SN O FI N wOYJJwuI~OYGCO>w WrM1ipW > OetOJ ( (WOVwOI OINVJY V N ~Il • ~l neW em .ee. ~ °~ c Nem.N. _ ~i \zmz. W o i W'~1p V xlP H V \WN° VYNVNOUN ND~NwoM2 ri JLLWJ d~ hJJJV N w pry W w . z y .. ~ siWS~Mi ~`~ n~iiW oWyaw o000 9 w 4 Oy 6 N N oxionren °e ceeo `.M1n z 'a z~rn° t e W f O t l~ _ W_i _ __ ( i .MiIF lJ/NOII{n Nlu VJWS(iG ~(l(i_ = WWWWRwrW„TW » W >OrtNCVUO) YOODC N V Yii y NN_lV w Y[ J HOVD ZhN• iV_N VV wW<wNVJV W WW VN VOVWyy oii o. ~:>i o °" wines Q „F SJJSNO lnij N sN M1VN..JN VLL( NV V7WFyFnu .iz oi~ozz res a' i~~~ W.i. zsx~rieou~uxo"M1M1 u x• .+i awoiz~xz~ oio V FJ.° WI~FO M1OC6i _ _ v uuD~~~iizi:(wz: .VON J ~..ll.ll..fallllllffl ( 0 i amm. mw.rND a m m wa< i .o wo N mw~ maeNnn n SWW VN nW6~ yy a2 SS R2 (NVV ilia .w.n zN a= N((wM1twpW ViV wzu Nr ci~:z~ Dw (i° OwWwlw wio ::~. rJ00lOE Npp°iooa u a N.. Nal°emaaTM1meeooN p N NI i iP' <p0 V W ego ~omoeow~oo eo.~mi >'aoi ap~a~. iii.ii:iiii~i+iaia+a++ia~i a~tla p o00 oooaoaaooeeoaeaoaoaaeoaaoaaae aaaaa oooaaae ¢ • 1 • . . • • .Sir°a~ :° is n •~•~Tj~ Ja • a NJ• • ITe.°. VN J n\ N Me ~ryW rOfV >_lN _ P•• WWwrfw C wrJ wi•V SW W WJ•• WN~6W JJJC~J VJ JJLLJ VNf Rr ¢fJ J i J~V~VJJ irVW, J u¢ PiJr¢ ~Vip rS ` J> >it°.~Ni »r,°•1 ."i> > u ai~relN piN ~J~~~ 'p pm. °w po p e i \ipo •pp pJ pfNN< fw p„e ¢J NJm LLUWWwwoiS61LLL W\\O )r<i LLVJ<1 m ¢JOOwOpV6 SUO SMrOmMr_r_SNV ONVJN p _ rirwir~N yY .N LLL w N VjiV2<miN 0=J 1<-rVWW 6WWS¢ ILIIV iwiiJiVpiiWpV r _ IVrIii N~nNpmpHiv¢ JV~w Jrp uJO J<6u 6UWm UOif mi<wi¢J J < JNONrSV¢VpO~irn< ¢Jr¢wr¢m J¢RW ¢O ¢1L JO< ¢<2J6¢rii<WWI¢NrYM VwWWJ LL iLLw WN ~V¢W•MLLWWLLNN• OSp H<GjWW WM aiiJwisw<w)>LLwww~j ~7p OOV¢CON VO)nOJ¢OOTTU .~¢6pnYp <VJWOVi¢ppp¢6{y'JUPp<FOV ... U yV feNe YLL N vV) NiJ JV> uLL¢Nir<NV• NZ~J ~JNOrw ipJN¢NWiprSNW N~a Wlrii r<fiii wiZLN wJ~ r V WLL N uU W vW i J pW LN JJ fr vV iZ¢ itWin N D ZKpV J VLV vViNS>J>2rNi¢• OrOV vL vV¢ LL ip¢Oii<ipJJ>wJ fVi ~f< WSNNIJ VpVpOpppWWwLLLLLLLLLLLLLLVVVVVVZLLZZ OPm P oMa par as eTe as a ra.: Boa ratio aca~a N ainmaii.°+aama ri~Na a NI VSw <LL LWO WNNPPappa00nNO:nOaoaoOe• pee eN NO0ovN0 p00 OryN oaN maONN N~pwaNaOaN.~m aNpOPN Nan Nwe N w an..N .ano nN~N .. n °e ~°.1 h N N aH Nr ~ NN N a .. a N aw a iN.. ~yi• \• n n .~NNaNan•wo~NmaNan•we..NwaNana a .a..S a :. S a a.. N..N. N.'" .'". w y n .: 9 a a .a. ° .a. .a. .°. n.. ".:.n. ^. n. ^ ~ • aoaeoaeoaa.aaaaaaaaaa~aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa oaaaaaaaa u aaa0oaaaaaaaa aaaaaVaaaaOaaa a`OaOaana w i a> • ^l Je N• •a •y a w=i N\ oataW PLO r\ N Vyy oU Opntinta0 N \y~ ~+ b a' JnW _ W • •\• O ••ni• •V V~ • \a p •Y VY 1 V • •uN HwN YV MM• ViFW wV j Zm yJJ JJJ S J VJJIZZ J y CSJ J NLL w LL Z J _, s Y »O 7» OJN »I~Jni \J Iw SGJi> > •V J IVJypp pCp •1 iIN •JN >wp VYp N•LLLLLLNW1l ll iwOS > 1 LLLLZ LLILib o pLL O <w i =>?yN„OON000 OONb M= OOnpeVjMN U[NpwOSLLIO.OJ~ JO n C YVJNYZN l bw•ZS NJWLL ib Y3N ii JWw<w_Ww Ziy WW• _ NIZ NV O YY•wWZO3rbiin~~Yi=Niwin Oi Wp iJei <Va w• SUGH<IVi SS•~nfaNZp •\Z>u2Nk • ONw<• VN•>•\LLY wJV•WiiYM6f SZWZOSi76i0eWW• b> VVK SZCJC(i+WWLLw WWILWWis Z wOZb • » ) <JWa>YWfY wJw> >W~<)J)bjWYO) >WOiN•obspb o.°YO W..i:a li lbbipe..blie l ~ny<oz<ab•bb<zNnb ~i ~i• HI w i u i io w u VV i» w Y~ Jw V lLL V MVN O i •ONw~ J_ JZ Niw~ OSW<ON SIeiNOJ< nN ~<< aJN Si IN N6V~p2Ji C i ~OpNi<i YVSO WM1Vne Yi2<~O<SSS~fVZNOJyi O SSS• iiZ OOOY ii'zzz.... .... ..llllii<.rJJJJJJJJJCii i u .i. l V < S a > V r M S = O iJ7 bJ NF raiSC Z SLL Vw SF z iJiNi iJ F wZ WZJON VUpNf~Vi YZ~r wJi /~3< OOJZ S'f iiizzzzzizzbobbaa .. as ii>.aaaa ...N.il aiia a vi N nnN~aNN as iai.~. .. NN 3 NI ~aW S alp SLL y LL r. v i rpOOMO00m ado p0 O/O p./Na eaarepP^NaNPNOa I~anmTONaa..a nFe P~- .fa o.f.N NopaN~Nynie ry^rfN .. ... .. N N ~ f ~ : -. .- i .. f a ¢i n / r i / n n r OY m~IN aNOPOfNmPNa.~OP fNmfNar NawfPO vT• P~yrPi rPi rOi .Pi .PiNNNNnNNNNNryryNM1NryMr •VIVIV V./aaVaaa V'IVVVY.O a.VfapaPPJVf•aPP)•+~PafP+Taa ooaaaoaaoaoofaaaoaaaaaa as oaaaooapof as oooaoaoo 2 zf ~ ~ u N i w \ • P ~pP n a :e a NaNf i i ¢a ego V •fWPa O m fI1M N NIOPO~ NQLOm O N a Vi ryv a20 ¢a~-f0 N• 1 __ ai Off •• O f fW f VLVVUH V/aVV iV wjpPO VJ VP VP NVU~w 16 tiV LLww¢¢N rV• rPr If i=J J~ JVrJ ZJJ =6J NON w0 O NJJ1~ J rV fM==NVp1pnOONifNN O=N O NyJfy00 O V Of sOWaOJr90 _O 70V •f6 ~. V..o NJONm P~f FW'.NO 0000NOpprOrOiNNjf ¢fi MJ ¢ O ON YiS~~ZWaW NWZwf~LL OWJW~i~pw NSnLL /~ VwKOJnsOON OJf OZFOOi OIJwOiLLi JJO O.[r0 ~fi~OW u.V 2F )7Y h_W~r Hf rVl~mmW> a00p ~NOOa •rn__LLwpO i~ r.OZ¢S O WiF p dwOW M1~L al)6M1¢Ji00J 200 r p WW fib rig wZWiiOUii » ii\O^r rO2W~¢OONO OIiZ JZ /O YJn6iJNN>on WiJLN6O F.[ON¢OJ Wf¢ V w>GOaV6 IZ ¢rW¢NS¢K¢ra¢iJ m +F LV wOf O'JSwr Tw wOViu wf:rm mm=WwN NW ~8~~°. a~dWW~"Si:w.~bd°m:~~~Ww.o:::~ '„ve' V~.Np OgWV000¢ONNOOLL f Jia mI pOaf00 / r a U V J 0 .V tl Vi Y e u N J.i+ a f pJ[J YZ Y VY N •V.~ V ci f V¢N • O O Z rJ r _ ZiW'wa O r V 26 \~u¢iLL¢ i y. viS O O ¢>JF UF• ionOLLW O [ I¢ p OOJLW VrW ry¢yZ .WiJ V I Uir r2rr YZa inyWSV6 „VVN.O.O Ja ZZ iO~N~ OJZWZFiZ WSO _ OP ¢JNr.J f J6w OP >~s6 t M iwn=s J N zJw• nJ0 VV p0 ZSLOYr OJ wwiOVVVU¢ W wVNaJ J atNaJOOJW ZW_____ _ O OYwOr~V aVVrwwap y W VV6NWYtF ¢JN OV¢ ZSWOVNWSZO_O_OWa2• JJOV JJ JJnWr¢rph vYWw rtafVJW __V_o„in4C O `VUrZfV •f w2y ¢S¢ JLNw071 uJ s iiWfwi.. VVwwzS6ftt Wig .`.oop¢r¢.f ff wssiYOP r~aY ¢<nWOp6¢6LLG6G6>4)Wr¢¢¢¢6¢¢¢~nNNNnNNNNNNNN NnnNNNrFr ryPaPNfar :in Nm . N.NmNf ~ mnN NNm N yNNNN rmmNNfmm f Nanm mN Z in ~. ¢N ~Sn i •i• 12 O• nmy~ „~op ~ T moNN Oa P m~00Pnna yin no~nm w ~ ~ mrN a.. Nah m.rN +.. m~M oppm~m~ ~n nl m pc<caoaooaaaaaaaaaaooonoconoaaacoaoaaaaaeaaoaoenaaaa _. . .• ~i T P• J a NJmJ P~\ w Aha ~ m p . _ V ¢JT~NNS TUZ.r Z.inVFWp L 6Vh NiJ Ph¢i KVVN _ Sw~npH ¢_pw ¢LLN • a20~+J O~n6 Z ~ ¢.S G JOJJ¢c¢ wUUFO wOppJV o wOwpfV ¢lo ¢OW¢JOU SrNi00 w¢¢¢rNNZw~¢¢1m YhWV.60VJ zz N V F r iw 00 2 OJ + YO <V V. ¢ N2Y •LO i~ =mow U ~2N zzz of :i .moo ozwz u~i~~° iz~¢+~ wi" 0¢JJJi¢ ¢.Yr~..Z2220 ¢J.. .ZiY OOOOON oaamaVVVUV~UJUUUUUUVVUU ~aaam..a~NMaaa~ NeNaaem Tnl N • '-S \ V N a N •• . \ V~NNyM 3 w ¢ J\ aV. N H\O m~ JJY.NJ 2F O\O 7V I ¢ Wirt 2b~OZ~P n N2\tl wwV Nh' Sprin aSi NZr~ uJ7 wpFK JV~ J¢e`rJ¢Z2 .2eU2t] VSI~a2u OW ¢i.nw~ WZwW¢ ..°ae~~¢¢wWZ¢~a¢mr¢a.. ...>2~.. OZ N l 2~2 O ww~ S Unrt a ~n LFLLLL 6V. J. w z .aa a ii.°. ~ioii ne ~°o inw ¢~.~ au~N V¢J JZS w~p » .ff. o[s UUOOOpO000p¢OOOUwwwwwwLLULLULL oaNa N NN~oamN..a en aN N NNnn 1 oo.•o ol-oq roomy ~. o e ' o P + n oea eao ..o oaN Poao~ io •o wDeF+ „ IO e T :i Oua NOnNMPr ra NaNINn Nin •aaN rf~r.. m noN + Nrv wM .. M .. r <a ~i o wo r N a -. a Mr..armPOrnMrNa NarmPa rvMrNarmPOw n m r° m. ~ - m mmm c a,mm mrnr '".aea$n °m om°maa.rl-ear oom+maaaamemv°, P°~ n r ° o ° , „ ~ MMM MMTmMnIM MI1MIiM MMMM M n MMMMMMnMM MMMMMMMn e a ~ > ~ ~a aaaaaaa a aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa Daaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaao • m m < < P P ~ U \ O N \ \n I~rt a\^J N N w O ~ ~ II \ P Y•aV aP •a • n \ N •N w al •PiPa ` aa2 a\i \ •• M< 1 PON< N v V V`i P < P < nPT r ¢ r ~N~ c n h ~ ` o :NP T ~ «J •sN . q \ m + . W N P2 ml N\42V• 7 N w VSPWP Njq•W P Wn H < F\'J Gil y•D<V qqV P K W 9\C wJpu<N ~ Z ~<.n \i+N Z ¢ipl OJ 1¢SJ pN _JwMu J 16 Nq ¢ ¢rvi 1 I wql IIp inl OJIN O Vex V J wIW < J6 ~ m D r Ou ii ' • nV t Tlp S W ¢I l JIpV wJ D W WM y WNOS l2PlYW wui4r w2• yy pNr pSi •L>w ~iO~wnnu lu JS2 YWpW^JW \O; •2• <V all<T M¢<YpZm<PmJ•<q <Iw16 NYep¢Y1~ l J r w SLL q NOp SS <mw i4'i Fir J V<D wHr n Y pOWw <pVmOUNW MIY¢}mIN21< w W nq~ LLwN O\VY <2wtrwiulZwrw W rWiYrZDN ZZViFwLLN NmmOY2r nSw N W Nu rq J42pJ„ J<SZ N wSW • ZVNw Yp2<p< fS N j N pr n ' n JwSN uiw ¢LL Nu\OwW wir_' >n ww uSM JOLLJJ<WS JJCIp FwjJ wJ VJ<OOZVJDJJ2go S4Yp;i Ju wOiVWM Jp in OF2DiOgOZJOD w;G ^ Cf2 Vu NODV=wp~- VwO=2 N=V=~6 LLr iw HV>N V '~ 1 pJ7WNYr JJaO<DOV uDOJ NZ,JUVVWwJO w u N2VpVw UVa2 DSJSNJiuV230 iN2 NONE-ZS3 NSN w m •t• ¢ ¢pwwwlpZU ~IDUYwr¢ p~rWOgJ>w rZrrD OLLZNLLLL ZZPLLiN LLin j<SOw¢p¢g6:<LL1r rZV u12LL¢wa>LL JW Jt N 6SN •Qwq WyLLWVwJ Jew qwW WJJ J mq> p¢NDC» P¢uNquJp ¢Onq¢>4JLLgpVYr7p< i6rD~ pZgN V 2 J Y S _ m p VJ• 3 q u t • Nl WNN N O H mm qr i Y i ~+ Z Wq •J 2N w Fm TNY D20 OO 2<2R2 V w0 62r V} qSU 1 •02n _ NOZ D J ~YW¢Y<w « > <OY~ NJ E 6 6< J6pp l>¢L u }J LL<` l:> J 7 pSwwO q<Ui{• i ~ ~ •Si0• <rJ• N ~itiwLL u< < < O ¢w 1O 2 .2N<ONI LLi000pU ¢Op< <S LLJw •ilWw iVppWW u+iNNSrgm •LZ i~LVrJW+ NJI w w wJr ~ ~ • =i _ JI qDq Y¢O > w6NVSW ¢i2Dq Yiw _V__V Y'n}LS Oww O 60 ;<J ~wSq} VJNOmC « =VJJV 6 OJSK<uMUD'Vewgpm[ : m w M<Ol3Wr O7j w Oj< < __ W W p J a T O < w ~~ •S~ VYYY r _ _ __ _ _ _ _u _ _ __ LL UVVVV ww llllYK KIL JJJ LLLLLLLLLL V omrryCO ran PaP+o nPnNNPNPa mMarnPO rrN Pr• Nnm9• u •2• aOPmN nP ¢Na ryPM M<mrnn nryN~N •nrmNrMNN <<< r<nnn nan rNVmrrn w r > c • • (, 2 • 00+0 OOONOO ONO• Npo •z• md+. w•.~h.elar alnrv~~HO o e ntetlomi moeenw; ~mron ' .• •~P NN anNmNZO N.. •m.Im N •p Nap~n N.. Z• / p TINaNmpOTNT IN ar-YnP TaNahmPOrNTa ar•mwe. t PTU P~pPTPPPTP wpPP~TmmT TPy IP as T /¢ Tmnn TTm TTTTTn mTTTmnTTmnpt wpj .n TmT~~mmTT~pTTnnm /¢ oaaaaa•aaaeaa•aa•amN•aaoaa••a•vaaa•aaaaa •aaa aea•aa ii r V ~ ¢P Nc w s°a .. w i ~. °a •~ °m • P: i u e ~ °aeu ~ i\i a waoNN AIL- .. W > z a ii.aw ' / NNPP J t = lamxJ 1 Z y / PwN¢ p wP¢LLP WC F• O V ~[ P =Np Y V tr !\W\ry OZ NJP Jwf ZU V• a pTar2 f ~ Y J N •~ ¢ trNMM NN VU ¢LL O{ Vw YZ !N ¢o F =aF_w O Vfy • ¢J 1 ILLEN¢ Ww Jai~tr pp O' 6 aJ~¢¢uNFC trl ZLL ¢ 1¢ LL f CJ CP NW • t ¢p W Vu Y ~1a1PV6 ~FWJrNeP ¢ON Vt..¢W ~•¢ •OmW ii ry:IrvJW j0 IWW yNQ• VZ f~-rVNWV ¢wO1NwY Z WfT rrta WaN •trw pW)i O`T ~NN VOS~pfJ= !V w a mZNN¢ f Y'NW V6O f_ NS_J OONMO O_ W lu.=m ¢ utyN N YNrN•r •Vn6wF 'h0: JOGUwa¢N Jrc•m JVO N ~N <JK Nf ~Zw 6mWOW¢ War ZlJi ut.220¢O •JO Nf r UO Jr yaY •[LLJwLL U ¢r f JwwZJLLrunm oZLLJ wJ (J06 V JUSN iwL¢O ~Wy~utr p VVmVeV V=:w GOf WZO u o .Ow=rOPV=NJ•••^IFwJwliNO6~ 6F• y OQaF` u JJ02i \Z aN V1 ~+ r Nd •W• rr •LL LLN mNJn.0110iNrOruJiV OJ NNt.JV00?FVFN.nWN NONNNJi w Y. LLLIf ILOOmONiiNWOJf<OJwJm NFIO ¢Of¢PTj~VO 20` rna0 WOw 1), Ow[y wo r wTZtr~FJ0.!<Fyi Y.6)!¢yEj4 WxJ ww`f Z f¢¢¢ K S rrJf6V V Z JNNyOCOVV¢u xZa w ~u '^ ~ mNs V J V Z N f n O N J J V 7WN f O u w ti ~ r ~ _ NZO O J J O( w2 »Z _ f w ZO V Lf i~ r VNO •• \ j wfr w •O t VJ•f NJwV='JLL ZN Wy VVWO w' LJUwYiZVrtrZ~VZJiLLf w jwp~<p •. ' ¢Zna O y•OjWZgf wl..2naw••[v U0 r ¢ wz N 000 • _NJa ZZ _OV6m ZV VZ~~JfO~Viryi rmiN -wJ<W: wVVV t N NOV rZi .Ja na wf JJ •JrV •~JG~NOLO •V N/.Z~Zrt•Z+`Mim f n4 Y f i. •< \z2 •I ~~JJZW Ntrh¢J N •¢ WAN iw NJ ¢ t ~+ woauWrpNyfozNN•f¢ owwwwwNO¢WO ~ N N .w~.~ a :w `VZ ZtrOWrVVOZ Z •(Zhu rVFiiO J VUZ¢ti: ZY aWn„J60f ZVrtfFIIO VV`:Y¢¢¢1W. •-OtrY•~•r JfJOrJV)r Vuw.::if n~ NofzzN •ff wwwQQa¢m¢f~~~w ii ciiiiizziz'zzzzzoooom¢eaWWSp.WUP e.w ne.¢ Ntrtr¢trN~NNNN ~pTmN maINNaNmp..aerNaNaTI . n no OnaNaTNa aNTNaTraNN wmtrp maNaaNNU~Nm Y211 T va raijm~ ry.YN Tmry ry TNV~TNTNmaN.•NN N rv N N NN OpITN w/ n .•N ''' q FI ZuO LL r i]r6 OOOPrOemO00pOno00eNIp pp ni °Ono panNO oNWOeeooepF ooe +.r.mn o aoioi oaw ego rvN ,ncero ,N era ~n NP N• IryP ONNN ~. w PamNhN m r < .. r m r ~YaN rvmnranr ae nNaa .. :_: \.Ye m .. • r JaN N.p NAY h fV PVO^N.p FOPOnN mmNf N.pFO NTaNO PPPVUaTpPPP cPP PPPPOOOOO oa 000 0 P a pPPPPP nfONafaf• •~aa•aQa~V poWOOaaoa a.meoaaaooonoaoaeaneaaava Wvcaea~o aaaN W Wa .• f • rflf . f T T J¢ I V i~h J\ w }N N = ~WW ¢ flli t O f f W FfV F =w OVO O f F fOW :. J`:e ~:: gW .. '~ SP O f00 MO V ON Ow f u ~ P nVUPYwiiw IJ+J i hH Yet ¢ NOV<f if0 OG In •SS.~6¢Y \r WPW06V i h O _ O• pp o OZmwyNyr• z2 JJ N pVOVrirv V.hi~Z Nr Fh_.hi N_'Jw Nf wn ~p Y00 OVW J J O m:N¢Sm V Y~f ¢oVF >OF I cZLL Lf0 J OJO PpVWU.JZ1JYw„ VWFa„~ FF •oY JoOpM1 ¢f OOOZNf RO Z fo p OY LLU Nul-YeeW ZUVMZ NN0000 iJ OrJOff FZW WO F ¢U SrwN2 w'F020 J Fw0_w2_W60 2 wWy O NWVON¢ nOJNJO fLL6 it/Z OK 1 u ¢ ¢00 ONON O Zi PfY WNLLWy '1 JLLf7 N=O yo YYPF ilV N NN6Y¢ fWJILLW>1¢W¢ 4Z~JFV o iws`f ff .a. oWMioLLNpoJW r¢o~a Fu¢ plo N ¢60¢ yVu1W-F 6J¢uOwyiri ?rJhNf rNNWZZWZ Ozf Y2'J SW..pw NZZ St w0 WY Nle(NrNhrrLLr n nFSfwm Oi VfZUU=~OJOhhNrNwNrV .fr Nib zp fFZJW7 oYU1f~J YVY u •JJHfa¢f NV VUNr JmVfUNpOYVJJTU~ P ynVfu2S>OFN¢OWNNVNO>)pLLUaVZnwHpfar i ~i •O2~ •q• •i• W tiW ~ N V M x s .n i .. o f Y~ V v00 f S O ¢f Wlr wU w LLi OlU ¢Or uOhf y C WJf NOIW¢N FS et W ¢ Y W V W V UVW riZ O NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N J a Phil N r Su i; z .. n~ ~o f O N F r 1 SY Nz of 00 FS Z OYW~~ t ONN s uprhJ Nz uuu 1f~WZi~°. U VfUriN ~.~n WVW ¢ZmOWwNrrfuOw wi~ w2wXOp LL TJT Y¢ ILZlnZV2 SJW _ W\WVSY ¢Sf YJf60 ZfV }J OeFNfVrn l• S}¢ NSe[r _ f3Z ffN JSY S¢O¢JZ2w6 ffJS¢NYY..EOFF 0006 » Jlf LO¢ IiFTT Mf• NNNNNNNNFFFFhFFFJ7J7>}T>ZllliilZl N<mno wNhmp TOaPaPF mPa Nmm~N m nnNNNrvnNN Nrm n nN n nmNm nnnnnnNNmn nNwNn n N Ib J U F• N ~~w V :o°n :oE .F. •F• •Z• •S• O~ •~~ .o.a eo m ;~oTT~ _ n n•~ nNN }~~ ~• Vb40V0<ViV r • i • N NOtl N O NNG f ~~VVNJ ~ •J66RFF~M VV MLLMT • Z M iiWJ~~°ss wi0•IOJ~N ieveW`oo U TN~r WuLLtlu~V FI ~~Y6 n QOMNfz~ Ffn FUN uN ~„ NV INNUVOiiN Y o O wV wV >~ ~S wK NJ ~V~J~ i Q o0 NSZn ZI NOS QiV> Sn0001 ~FFI}MNnY m NNNm m /- I GATE: T0: FROM: I 3Y: ~~ SU9JECT: -- ('1'1'1' nP K:1 ~1'Ilu l'I'(',11I(iXG:1 STAFF REPORT March 4, 199? _~ ,,~ .i'"~~, Maynr and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager 'dilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE 55,000 FROM DEFERRED P.E VF.N UE ACCOUNT 22-236 TO PREPARE A DESIGN STUDY FOR ROCHESTER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS NORTH OP HIGHLAND AVENUE AND TO AMEND FISCAL YEAR 91/92 BUDGET TO INCLUDE APPR OPR IRTICN IN A SYSTEMS ERPENOITURE ACCOUNT ocrnu~cunnr mu It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve the appropriation ~~ ', of 25,000 and amend Fiscal Year 91/92 budget to include funds in a Systems Expenditure account. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS ~ I ' On March Z, 1988, Marbo rough Development paid an in lieu fee of $514,965 to the City for improvements of Rochester Avenue north of Highland II ~~ Avenue- The street improvements were a condition of development. The I j developer, who was on the west side of Rochester, paid the in lieu fee so 'I I, when development on the east side occurred the full width of road j '~ improvements would be installed. Development on the east half has not occurred. Therefore, the City plans to design and construct the west li half of Rochester Avenue with a connection Lo Vintage Drive. Also, using ~. the full accrued value of funds, which currently are 2759,000, I improvements up to Banyan may be installed. A design study is needed for staff to determine Lhe limits of work and provide a time schedule of I, j design/construe ti on for budget planning. 55,000 would cover the staff ~i Lime and material charges to prepare a design study this fiscal year. II Respectfully suhmi tte d, ' I ~~~j'~i'~' ~'i 'dilliam J- C'Neil ''~, '~, City Engineer WJ O:HM:sd ~, J ~a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE; March 4, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AI CP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: N1111e Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 13800, located at the southeast corner of Main Street and Reid Avenue, submitted by Orrin Bros. Construction Company. RECOMIEIIDATIOM It is recommended that Ctty Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 13800 and authorizing the City C1 erk to cause said map to record. Analysts/Background Parcel Map 13800 was approved by the Planning Commission on February 13, 1991, for the division of .41 acre of land into 2 parcels in the Low Residential Development District, located at the southeast corner of Main Street and Reid Avenue. One of the conditions of aDProval of the Parcel Map is a request to vacate Reid Avenue, south of Main Street and west of the pro,{ect site. On October 16, 1991, the City Council approved the vacation of said Reid Avenue and this resulted 1n a portion of Reid Avenue becoming a part of the Parcel Map and a portion becoming a part of the parcel to the west. Public Improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. The Developer, Orrin Bros. Construction Company, 1s submitting a cash bond for the setting of monuments 1n the following amount: Monumentation Cash Bond f2, 500.00 Respectfully submitted; William J. O'Neil ~-~ City Engineer WJO:WV;,Ih Attachments RESOLUTION N0. 9~ ~ U ! A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APP ROYING PARCEL MAP N0. 13800. NHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 13800, submitted by Orrin Bros. Construction Company, Subdivider, and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the southeast corner of Main Street and Reid Avenue, was approved by the Planning Comnlssion as provided to the State Subdivision Map Act and Ts in compliance with the recuirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 13800 is the F1na1 Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and NHEREAS, said subdivider has met the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the F1na1 Map. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYEO by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: That the Final Map be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map No. 13800 be and the same 1s hereby approved and the City Engineer 1s authorized tc present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. l~ s! /f a ~~ IL (EY/ST 2ES/oEpT/AL) Zo.vE i ~ l ~ ~ I ~ p ~ - ~ ~ c 1 t,n.c ser.. p '~"" __~ -~~ ~ V i ~ 9r.~ r 0 ~ I ~ r P~ RC 6L/f 9 , , 1 L ~ Q L~ C (/ACAUTJ ~ 2 ~ ~ ZD4E L -) ~ \ 'W ` 1 e Wyy IfII/~ vi yq a/V ~ ~i i' r Z~Y V//J ~ a. r. e s. F P aG, P~'~ S/TE c G~ 5LH 7 Er/PY QES/OEPr/.~c.) ZJA/E L 23 ~ dl 22, i ~ 2/ ), , ?O i /9 /B \ [s.nr ra.~ I _ ,, ~, n ~ ~~, . l a L 1 Ar:c 2 P 7r ro ~., J iR ~~J- ~ CEK/S'L IfE S/OE4T/d G) ~ ` a (q+/) ~'r / i l ~ ~ LJ ~ ' ! ZOA/E L ~ ' ' I\I +~ ~~ IIT IU I 1 RA/[ ROAD C~'~Y ®.F RA?dC7~J0 Cl9CAPA®@dGA E~1GiNEERING DIVISION ,~ r r ~~~ '~~ r` N ,~ _ ITE;N; PM /.3800 TITLE: EXHIBIT:. A // ~S t'I1'1' UI~ R:1SClIQ C'I'C':1AIU\U:1 STAFF REPORT te. r rR, DATE: +la rch 4, 1992 >'- T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~~ ,_; Jack Lam, AICP, City !"a na ger F ROtd: William J . O'Neil, City Engineer 3Y: Dan James , Senior Civi'. Engineer SJ BJECT: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR MAP AND PLAN CHECKING WITH DERBISH, GL ER~4A AND ASSOCIATES RECOl41ENDATION It is rec onmended that the City Council approve the subject agreement with Derhish, Guerra and Associates and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the same. BAf,KGRWN6/ANALYSIS When the economy started to slow down Engineering Oivisi on stopped issuing projects to consultants for plan checking. Presently there are only two in- house plan checkers providing all the plan check services. The result has i been extended turn around time. It is now taking 8 to 10 weeks to complete the first pt an r.heck. Engineering has been receiving requests from developers to expedite the plan checking process. The City Council adopted a resolution establishing revised ' plan check fees. The resolution has a provision to allow expedited plan check ~~ services through an additional charge. t Also, the Victoria Lakes Community Facilities District proposes to contract street and storm drain improvements worth approximately 525.0 million and ~ approximately 57.0 million worth of utility installation. In order to meet the time schedule set by the developer and scheduled opening of the Regional Nall, the plans for these improvements need to be reviewed and approved for bidding by July, 1992. '' 'he suSj ect agreement would provide for the use of the ron sul taut for plan r,'n e e!;i ng services when du elopers request expedited review and for plan checking services for the CFD. Respectfully submitted, ' - .-, i 'd ill iam J. O'Neil °ity Engineer 1~ I CITY OF RANCFIO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 4, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, Cfty Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF SECURITY, AND DEPOSIT FOR LARK DRIVE BETWEEN IT'S EASTERLY TERMINUS AND ROCHESTER AVENUE STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY SUBMITTED BY THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY. AECOl~ENDATIOM It 15 recommended that the Ctty Council adopt the attached Resolution approving an Acquisition Agreement, Security, and Deposit, also authorize the Mayor and the City C1 erk to sign said agreement. The William Lyon Canpany after unsuccessful negotiations with the property owners is requesting that the C11y complete negotiations for Lark Drive per the three party agreement between the City, the School District and the N111Tam Lyon Company dated December 3, 1987. The City 7s authorized by State Law to acquire by eminent domain that property necessary for street improvement purposes. The Developer has signed the agreement and submitted the appropriate deposit and security for the acquisition. This agreement allocates costs and responsibilities towards obtaining said properties. Respectfully submitted~,/ William J. O'Neil J City Engineer NJO:MO:Iy Attachment RESOLUTION NO- ~~ 03g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT OF OFF-SITE PROPERTY, SECURITY, AND DEPOSIT FOR'LARK DRIVE FROM THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME HEREAS, The William Lyon Company has entered into a 3 party agreement with the Chaffey High School District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct Lark Drive and obtain Rights-of-way therefore as shown on Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, The William Lyon Company has called upon the City to complete the acquisition process; and WHEREAS, for The William Lyon Company to meet the requirements established by said agreement The WTl liam Lyon Company has offered the Acqulsl tT on Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient security and deposit. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Acquisition Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Acquisition Agreement on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Acquisition Agreement is accepted as good and sufficient, subfect to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1992. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: enn s ou ayor ig u~c~~Ar`lo AvE~IUE ~ ~ rzTE ~~0 I ~ I I A~rJ ZZ7-all-13 I At>rJ 227-OII-09 ~ ~ i I I I PART I a ~ PAtZT 2.1 f 2 -~- zc. x +I LARK OQIVF_ FU1-u RE HIGN SG NOOL ~~RK LAND W 7 i~ Q f- W I ~~ c~~r~~ t i t ir; ~,~~; -, ciTV or a~~NCF{u cr`~c,~,~lo~~c,~ ~ ~ ,_-~.11~~ ar ''r = ENGINEERING DIVISION ~. VICINITY RIAP N ivn"'~ 1 ~ paRe t dol ~~ L~'~d~ ,d, L1~1~1X~ r; RI D 'n 'O f 1 v° mD Nn (~ ~"~ .~ O ~3 ~ D O Z Z -~ c m A r K r m 4 m F k N N n _W -1 Z b m E r Y m 0 l~Z r D m ~U .~ m ~ E ~ lV , z ~ F ~ ~ ~! m ~ w ~~ `. 3 m ~~ n G 0 ; ~ ~~~ 0 m ~. z W Z y ~ ~ m i p ~I f ~~l 4~ zm ~ ~~ i "~ .~ mn f~ < w l m _r mz ~m WT yW 2Y 62, 0' ;nm mm ECT ]2 00' 30 00' ~ F . ~__ . ~r~i :~ _ ~ m ou a? .00'01 D'O C\ •; P m \~ 3¢ w ~= o o ~~ n o Q N m iW OOi ~~ >. J~ '~ ~V W~ 1 Q ~~ ~: ;~ as ~ a W2 W~ N~ ~ OI ^^ `fl of r m~ t ~ N~ 1 1V1 ~I `L` l7 ~~ 1 ~~ l~~ i " ~ ~ i 4 O ~~ ~ ~ O t O , ¢ Y N /, ti y n ~r i3 `! W ~" 10 '^ ~ z -- ~ o W ~2 j ~ x =~ LL f _ o n z 4 au WW -~ Z N j ~ v \ ` W ) W ~ r ~ \ W W 3 r z r ¢ ~i i3 00 L`l.f ~~ \~ Q J 3 z F m 2 2 i 0 z J N } Z Z Q ~ a i-- ga O~ U U U ~ W O~ a a~ ~J W J D W h U o Gp, N ooe 6 • v! n°im Q Mor F- rc4S Q O F 0 o°u p~0 oom ¢QJ O /C./1~ ~ f > ~ T 1-~. ~I ~A1~~ ~ .`.... ZJF 2. J ._ ' 9b Y ~mm as ~ 1<~d~ ~. L{~~\I P. .: 3~.~ 3.. r r3 m y, ~~ D r -~ o° my N C1 n n :17 -i V Op ZZ N C a m +°~ m m m R z f w O n z m ti 1 m b t -_~ __~. ({~ tt m z "0 +°. D ti b m n m_ r _ ! ~£ ~11 m M \ - tv m ~~ `~ . ~ ^tiw 4 ~ ~ b ~ ~ z ~ \ ~~o o ~11 x\ :Dn , 0~J `~g u~ m O b `•~ ~ ~n .fC . , o d' ,,; ~.~ ~ J "J. (~ ~~ C!~ y, m n 1~ a M1b P~ NK mr n- i Wm ti~ z~ bm m 0 1, i -- -- - - -- CCPI' OF RAtiCI-iO Cl'('AAIOVGA STAFF REPORT ~ ,~,-c~ rte. --^.'~ GATE: March 4, 1992 ,1 (( T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ' Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager 'i FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ' BY: Henry Mu rakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET ' IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY AT THE ~, SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CALAVERAS AVENUE AND NINTH STREET BETWEEN THE CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for installation of Street Improvements and Dedication between the Church of the Nazarene and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/AIUiL YS I S The attached subject Agreement between the City and the Church of the Nazarene provides for street improvements which include curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, along Lhe northwest corner portion of the Church of the Nazarene parcel. The Church of the Nazarene has agreed to grant to the City a Road Easement t0 allow for Lhe street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements for the Calaveras Avenue from Ninth Street to Chaffey Alley Project. Respec tfuily submitted, , ~~%k~ ~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:HM:Iy Attachment 3 RESOLUTION NC. v/'1. ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION FROM THE CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Cou ncit of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Calaveras Avenue from Ninth Street to Chaffey Street A11ey Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the northwest corner portion of the Church of the Nazarene parcel, shall be made a part of the Calaveras Avenue from Ninth Street to Chaffey Alley Project; and WHEREAS, the Church of the Nazarene has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to Lhe City for said improvements. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. 2y CI'[";' OF RAl•ICHO CtiCA:~lO\G?. STAFF REPORT > ' DATE: March 4, 1992 ~~ j T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council '~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer DY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET FROM APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET WEST OF CHERRY AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 1900 FEET EAST OF CHERRY AVENUE, A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT 24TH STREET AND CHERRY AVENUE, IMPROVEMENT TO CHERRY AVENUE FROM 24TH STkEET TO THE I- 15 FREEWAY AND THE INSTALLATION OF A 30" WATER LINE IN 24TH STREET SUBMITTED BY FIRST CITY /fNNTER'S RIDGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP IN CONJUNCTION WITH TRACT 13750 LOCATED IN THE CITY OF FONTANA RECOMIENDATION It is recommended that the City Cauncll adopt the attached resolution accepting the sub,iect agreements and securities and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Hunter's Ridge (Tract 13750) is a single family residential development located on the north side of 24th Street in the City of Fontana. The Developer, First City/Hunter's Ridge Limited Partnership is requesting the construction of a 30" water line in 24th Street for water supply from Cucamonga County Mater District to their deve7 opment. Hunter's Ridge has been conditioned by the City of Fontana to construct extensive offslte Improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which includes, but not limited to, the south half of 24th Street from approximately 600 feet west of Cherry Avenue to approximately 1900 feet east of Cherry Avenue (Exhibits B-1 and B-2); traffic signal at the intersection of 24th Street and Cherry Avenue (Exhibit B-3) and the construction of a four lane street, including a landscape median 151and, for Cherry Avenue from 24th Street to the I-15 Freeway (Exhibit B-4). Prior to the issuance of any encroachment permits for the construction of the 30" water line in ?4th Street, the Developer will construct the south half of 24th Street from the existing terminus easterly to Cherry Avenue which will help reduce the traffic congestion during the construction of the 30" water ;~ 5 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPGRTS 24TH ST - FIRST CSTY/NDN7ER'S kI DGE March 4, 1942 Page 2 line. In addition, the Developer will work closely with staff to provide communication to the existing residents in the area explaining the proposed construction schedule and limits of work. The Improvement Agreement provides For the construction along 24th Street including the traffic signal at Cherry Avenue to be completed within six months and the construction of Cherry Avenue to be completed within twelve months. The ayreements and secu rlties submitted by First City{Hunter's Ridge Limited Partnership for the before mentioned improvements are in the following amounts: Faithful Labor and Performance Bond Material Bond 24th Street West of Cherry Avenue E 166,000.00 S 83,000,00 24th Street East of Cherry Avenue 224,000.00 112,000.00 Traffic Signal at 24th Street d Cherry Avenue 250,000.00 125,000,00 Cherry Avenue 24th Street to I-IS Freeway 945,000.00 472,000.00 3O" Water line in 24th Street Summit Avenue to East City Limits 92,000.00 46,000.00 Total 51,677,000,00 E838,000.00 Copies of the agreements and securities signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ,,~ ~~ J Will{am J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JS:diw Attachment l~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~ . ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALiFORNI A, APPROVING IhIP ROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR 24TH STREET, CHE RRi AVENUE, TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND A 30" WATER LINE IN 24TH STREET. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, City/Hunter'saRidge LimitedsPartnershipmas developer,eforntheeimprovementFofst Public right-of-way generally located in 24th Street and Cherry Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements,ise`corbeedone inid Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, conjunction with the development of Tract 13750 located within the City of Fontana; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreements secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which is identified in said Improvement Agreements NU41, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: That Bald Improvement Agreements be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said Ctty and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and subjectitolapprovalnassto formeandreontenttthereof by the Cityicient, Attorney. a~ Sim CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDVEERING DIVL9ION N.T. 5 , N ~; TR. /3750 TITLE: VICINITY MAP_. 2Q EXFiIDIT: MA ~ 't-~Z ' 1 ~ `I, ° W ~~i 1, ;illy. IV~'°'{•~l cil ar ~6~I"I~f,,,•,Z `~a ~~. ,'r.,... ,,,y=,:,~=~ it '.: + _~....~ ~~ II ..ybn <.. ~ x5 ++ f~ '~ ~ i "~ ~~~ g I ~'1 :~~ ~d9 i I •'n [\ II ap Zxi ~ r~ql ., ~I,JI `~1~ ~+ `V o ~ l ; ~:e II jI i :s ~I i I 4 ~~Il i ' F;^ ' I ~x~a ~ti `V ~ ~ I ~ i ~ - ~ zttj Wy ~ l i N :~I ,,, ;. .~ - gyp.,. i..,:i$,?~'I '• I i ! 1txa+xq l~ ,p.x l ~~ I d ~11M] Tll~nlf Nx~l 'L9 ~'81~4, NXd ~i3r p J/ri ~ N71d (V 9 Cjl I! t 8 , i I . ~ w,.~ a 1 L ~ ~~ 1 ,.. I I• u i x ' I 'r • I •.,, .. t 1 ~ ~I .J ~ I ..,..,. I I i-°:vl i ...../ y 11 ~ i ,,, A I b r I .i., i~: ~i{'{I ;' i 1! I L;, ,. N 1.1•,. ~ c..ii/I •,•,• ~R I I. I ~.~ ~I~I II ill i ~~`. ~f.7i~ ICE Sq~ ~i s~ ~~ 4 y, 010 L~ ah w~ W ~~ QO ~, ' iq I I ~I 'I ~ t" ~.'tl11F{ ~ 'O'C1 1 PI iP 1C.. I Z' .. _,.. ...y,..l.~. i ~~ ~ . ,,,. ~J ~ I I I ~ ~ I U: : ;',1A1 ~I .~'1.. y li I I',. .. `,. r ti lit ~Ii~' ~ '.j, ~~ ~ 3~ N N vM` w ;'~ ~ ~,i'~ ~ W ~~ ~~ ,, ~ I~~ ~,, N p ~ I ~'~ ~ ~ D ~t] 1, ~ ~ ~, U ~° - _ I ~ _'~ ~ _ I i~ V. _ ~nar~ ~~ Ir I e ¢.,y~ ~ le ~,~. YF2 1 ~~ili~ill _~~ ~ m ?COI V ll ~ i ~ 'S.. ~ ~ ~~v F ~~~ t~ ~~ u~ ~ V ~ ~'2 _.. Il li 11 \~L~~ - ~ • \ IIO F ~ 61i lL O~^~J`~GY 006` ~.~ / ~~I a \\ `\ 1 ~ N I _ CKER. Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a -- ~~ ~ ~- ~ 1 ~ ~ z ' ~ RVEN U E ' ~ '~~ m I ~ n { ~ ~; I ~ ~ _I a~~, ~ ~ ~ a. _ I ~ ~ "~ L~ a v ~~ ~~ ~ I i ~ 'nom. ~~ /~ r ~. I I ~ ~/ . ~ ' on ~ ~ „s ~f i ~ I~ tiN ~ ~ pd F ~ m ~ i ~ ~ ~ W q ^' ^~ V ~/ ~ N ~ti ' I iW ~~~ ~ ~9 ~~c ~ i ~ W a~* x~i ~ ci of ei I ~~ ~, ~~ J '~ g -3 3 ~ ~, 3r 7??AFF/c I31 ~ IN'"I I S/GNRL rp ~ • ~. ~Q TH, ~ ~ ~?~-~- ~,i i ~ ~, ;;^ '~ ~ ,; .~ ~{/ n 4 a ~'r j~~ ~ ' ..r _. , . C. _ ~ •. I CF .. f ~;./~ / 1j, r' ~ /A/OlCA/ES ! CE'~iU.~tl1 ii~.,•n~~` ~ ~~/(+~ !• i.4 k ~o ®laaRce~enoEUrs r .i/:, l~f~~i;l :~s i TNl> //GKEE/+EA!/~ iit d{~ ~1 ,,' ~1 ~'F~ ~1111r`f I e.. 4 y i ~' ~° n r ~' :;. r~ ,, ,~~;,~~ EXH/B/T B 4 y; ~ c i f. 1 ~ cHE,e,ey av i i3 ~ .~ i ~~;~~i'I~i f° 3 ~ ;q~, ~. , y/ a ; , 'i ~',P ~' ~.~'_ c -------- - CITY OF RANCHO ClY' A~tONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 4, 1992 T0: FROM BY: SUBJECT: r^j `,~o> Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR OR 87-56, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND JERSEY BOULEVARD RECOMMEN011TION: The required street improvements far DR 87-56 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of E904,000. BIlCK6R0UND/ANALYSIS OR 87-56 -located on the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Jersey Boulevard DEVELOPER: Stenton Jersey Partners 28202 Cabot Road, Suite 200 Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5904,000 Respectfully submitted.` ;,-~ C'~ Le,~ William J. O'Neil "/ G1 ty Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment RESOLUTION N0. C~~, ~ aa, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING 7HE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR B'-56 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 87-56 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resoives, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 3 LI - •--- - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CdMONGA STAFF REPORT ~. ! DATE: March 4, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~~, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer i BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II c:/' SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOT ICCE OF ~ COMPLETION FOR DR 90-05, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HELLMAN AVENUE ANO 9TH STREET '', RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for DR 90-05 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and tt is recommended that City Council accept said Improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of E330,000. BACK9t0UND/ANALYSIS DR 90-05 - located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and 9th Street DEVELOPER: Russell D. Jeter 935 Vista de LeJas Drive Santa Barbara, CA 93110 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5330,000 Respectfully submitted, /~`'~`~ William J. O'Neil City En9lneer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment 35 RESOLUTION N0. ya - ~,~ j' A RESOLUTION OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 90-05 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A ~NO"fICE OF COMPLETION FOR TfiE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 90-OS have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San 6ernardl no County. 3~ -- CITY' OF RANCHO CCC.A~SUNGA STAFF REPORT Sr ~ ~ _ ~., ~'~i DATE: March 4, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~~ FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II ~? SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF ~~ • COMPLETION FOR PARCEL MAP 12263 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST '~, CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE '~ i The required street improvements for Parcel Map 12263 have been conpleted in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Malntenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of (33,600.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completlort and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of E336,000.00. BACKGROUND/AlU1LYSIS Parcel Map 12263 - located at the southeast corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenues DEVELOPER: The Nilliam Lyon Co. 4490 Von Kansan Newport Beach, CA 92658 Fccept: Release: Malntenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 33,600.00 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f336,000.00 Respectfully subelst`d, ~~~~ Wm. Joe O'Neil Ctty Engineer WJO:SMG:Iy Attachment 31 RESOLUTION N0. 9~- ~ `~ A R"eSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 12263 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 12263 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepteC and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 1( -- CITY OF RANCHO Ci'CAf1ONGA ~<z --- ---- STAFF REPORT I ~''' DATE: March 4, 1992 ~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~~ FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~~~ BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer 'I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE BONOS FOR THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENT ~i, PROJECTS: ARROW ROUTE WIDENING, PHASE II, CO 90-009; ~~ HIGHLAND AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION HERMOSA TO MAYBERRY AVENUES, ' CO 90-073; PARKS RETROFIT, CO 90-022; BASE LINE ROAD ~, BEAUTIFICATION, CO 89-160; HILLSIDE ROAD STORM DRAIN, CO i, 90-002; 19TH STREET, HEST CITY LIMITS TO CARNELIAN AVENUE, I CO 90-046; 19TH STREET AND AMETHYST STREET, CO 90-073; 4TH STREET AND NAYEN AVENUE ENTRY MONUMENT, CO 90-019; AMETHYST STREET NORTH OF 19TH STREET, CO 90-051; 19TH STREET ARCHIBALD TO HAVEN AVENUES, CO 90-137 It is recomm:nded that the City Council authorize the C1Ly clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds on the subject improvement project- BACKtllOUMD/ANAI'fSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects 1n materials and workmanship. Respectfully submltte~d, William J. O'Ne11 ~~ City Engineer WJO:LRB:sd 3~ ORDINANCE NO. 485 AN ORDINAi~7CE OF TEiE CITY :llCmICIL OF THE CITY OF PANQi0 CLYAMONf'A, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A N'f.W CHAPPFR 9.24 'IO THE RANCHO CiGAh10N('~ MUNICIPAL CODE FET2'iAINING TC MASSAGE TDCiNICIANS, ESFABLiSfR•II•lIS AND ST~ffIAR BL'Sl7•iFSSES The City Council of the C±.ty of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows; SECPION 1: A new Chapter 9.24 hereby is added to the Ra-xho CLcararga MuniciFxal Cie to read, in words and figures, as follows: "chapter 9,24 'R•1assage Establishrpnts and Teclv;icians "ARTICLE I - Massage Fstablishvmnts "Section 9.24.010 - Definitions 9.24.020 - Permit Required 9.24.030 - Sane - Exceptiors 9.24.040 - Massage Establishment - Application 9.24.050 - Same - Operatirxl Rs3uirements 9.24.060 - Sane - Facilities 9.24.070 - Same - Inspections 9.24.080 - Sure - permit NOt Assignable 9.24.090 - Same -Change of Location or Name 9.24.100 - Same - Notification of Change 9.24.110 - Scarp - Renecral of Permit 9.24.120 - Applicability of Regulations to Existing business "ARTICLE II - Massage Technicians ".Section 9.24.7.00 - Massage Technicians - Permit Required 9.24.210 - Sane -Application 9.24.220 - Svre - Renewal 9.24.230 - Same - Notification by Technician "A.4PICLE III - Out Call Massage Sas vices "Section 9.23.300 - Out Call Massage Services - Special Qdorsement Required 9.23.310 - Svne - Application 9.23.720 - Same - Records "ARFTCLE S/ - Prohibited Conduct, procedures, and Penalties "Section 9.24.%,00 - Pe~ohi.bitej Conduct 9..;4.410 - Suspensions Pending Revx tion 9.).4.420 - Revocation - Message Establishment Pettnit 9.24.470 - Sang - htassJaye Tc~hnician Permit lL OCdinance No. 485 Page 2 9.24.440 -Permit Denial/Revocation Appeal Procedure 9.24.450 - Fav:den of Proof at Hearing 9.24.460 -Penalties for Violation of Chapter 9.24.470 -Civil Remedies Available 9.24.480 - Severability "Section 9.24.010 -Definitions "Unless the p~-tinilar provision of the context otherwise requires, the definitions and provisions containal in this Ser_tion shall govern the construction, meaning, and application of words and phrases user in this Qiapter: "(a) 'Director' shall mean the Adrunistrative Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or his or her designer. "(b) 'Fli~loyee' means any and all persons, other than a massage technician, who may render any service to the permittee, and who receives caR~ensation from the permittee or his or her agent, and who have no physical contact with the customers or clients. "(c) 'Hearing Officer' shall mean the City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or his or her designee. "(d) 'Massage' means any method of treating the e~rterrul pu-~ of the human body for remedial, health, or hygienic ~ by means of pressure on or friction against; or stroking, kneading,rubbing, tapping pounding; or stimulating the external parts of the human body with the hands or other parts of the human body, with or without the aid of any mechanical or electrical apparatus or appliances; or with or without supplementary aids, such as rubbing alcohol, liniments, antiseptics, oils, powders, creams, lotions, ointments, or other similar preparations. "(e) 'Massage Establishment' means any establishmesit having a fixed place of business where any person, firm, association, pa.f r.ip, corporation engages in, conducts, or car,-ries on, or pei.-mits to be engagai in, conducted or carried on, arty business of giving massages, baths, administra- tion of fomentation, electric or magnetic treatments, alcohol ruts, or any other type of system for treatment or manipulation of the human body with or without any charactrs of bath, such as Turkish, Russian, Swedish, Japanese, vapor, shower, electric tub, sponge, minec-al, fomentation, or any other type of bath. "(f) 'Massage Technician' sha 11 include a 'Massage Technician', Massage Trainee', 'Masseur', 'Masseuse', and Weans any person who administzrs to another person, for any form of consideration, 'massage' as defined, or Oaths, manipulation of the body, electric massage procedure, or similaz procedure. F "(g) 'Permittee' means any [p1-son, firm, partnership or corporation avirg a permit issued hereunder, "(h) 'Recoc~iized School of Massar;e' means any school or institution of learning which teaches the theory, ethics, practice, profession, or work of massage, whim has been approved pursuant to the California Education Code. A school offering a correspondence course ~I lrcquirinq attendance shall not be Ordinance No. 485 Page 3 deertrfl a 'recognized school'. :he City of Fanclio Cucamonga shall have the right to ~rfirm that the applicant has actually atterdecl class in a recognized school of massage. "(i) 'Out Call Massage Service' means any business where the primary function of such business is to engage in or carry on massage, not at a fixed location but at a location designated 65' the customer or client. "Section 9 24 020 -Permit 1teAUired "(a) It shall be unlawful for arty person, firm, ~'+ h'p ar corporation to engages in, conduct or carry on, or to permit to be engaged in, mnduc.-ted or carried on, in or upon aM premises within the city of ltanc3ro Cucamonga, the operation of a massage estab7.istmrht as herein described, without first having obtained a permit issued by the City of pancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions hereinafter set forth. Said permit shall invrer>i.ately be surrendered to the Director upon suspension, revocation, or expiration of said permit. "(b) A ~ *++'.t issued n~m~?nt to this Qiapter shall be valid for twelve (12) months from the date of issuance unless revoked or ~ 'lhe permit required shall be in addition to arty lusiness lirnlue required by City ordirianee or any other permit required for such use includuy, but not limited to arty conditional use permit or other similar entitlertent for use. "Section 9.24.070 -Same -Deceptions "'lhe provisions of this chapter shall not apply to the followitq classes of inr]ividuals while engaged in the performance of the duties of their respective professions: "(a) Physicians, surgeons, chiropractors, osteopaths, or physical therapists who are duly licensers to practice their respective professions in the State of California. "(b) Msses ra7istered under the laws of the Stare of California. "(c) t7arbers and beauticians who are duly licenLSed under the laws of the State of California while engaging in practice within the scope of their licenses, except that this provision shall apply solely to the massagitg of the ne~c, Pace, and/or scalp of the customer or client. "(d) Hospitals, nursing hwres, sanatoriums, or other health care facilities duly licenser3 by the State of California. "(e) Aaredited high schools, junior colleges, and colleges or universities whose coaches and trainers are acting within the scope of their enploynnnt. "(f) Trainers of amateur, semiprofessional or professional athletes or athletic team. `~ Z Ordinance No. 485 Page 4 "Section 9 24 040 - Massage_EStablishment A~lication "(a) Arty person, corporation, or partnership desiring to obtain a p..tanit to operate a massage establishment shall make application urcler penalty of perjury to the Director. Prior to suimittirrg such application, a nonre- fundable fee in an amount established by City council resolution shall be paid to the City to defray, in part, the cost of the investigation and report required by this Chapter, A ce17]' of the receipt shoring payment of the reguira3 fee shall accorgkany the application. "(b) 'She application and fee required order this Section shall b° in addition to any license, permit or fee required order any other Chapter of this Code or ordinance heretofore or hereafter adopted. "(e) The application for permit does not authorize conducting a m3ssaye establistvrent until such permit has been granted, "(d) Each applicant for a massage establishment permit shall suhnit the following information: "1. The full true name under which the business will be conducted. "2. The present or proposed address where the business is to be mrducted. "3. The applicant's full, true name, any other name, used, date of birth, California Drivers License number or California identification number, Social Security number, present residence aaciress and telephone number. 'She sex, height, weight, color of hair, and color of eyes, "4. Previous two (2} residences of the applicant and the inclusive dates at each address. "5. 'the applicant's busuiess, oavpation, and e~layment history for five (5) years preceding the date of application, and the inclusive dates of sa>re. "6. The permit history of the applicant, including whether such person has ever had arty +,^;t or license issued by any agency, Lroard, City, County, Territory, or State, the date of issuance of such a permit or license, whether the permit or licvJrse was revoks3 or suspended, or if a vocational or professional license or perm).t was issued, revoked, or suspend, and the reason(s) therefor, "7. All convictions for any crime involving conduct which requires registration under any state law similar- to and includilxl California P=eal Code Section 290, or of conduct which is a violation of the provisions of any state law similar to and including California dial Code Sections 314, 315, 316, 318, 647, or any crime involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or moral turpitude. "8. A cat~lete definition of all services to be provided. ~-{ 3 ordinance No. 485 Page 5 "9. 'Rte Hanle, address, and date of birth of each massage technician, aide, trainee, or enq~loyee who is or will be enployad in said establishment. "10. 'Ike name and address of cry massage lusiness or other like establishment craned or operated )ry any person whose name is required to be given pursuant to this Section wherein the business or profession of massage is carried on. "11. Aaxptable written proof that the applicant is at least eighteen (18) years of age. "12. If the applicant is a mzporation, the Warne of the mrporation shall be set forth e>mctly as shown in its Articles of Incorpora- tion or rnarter to3ether with the State arc3 date of incorporation and the names and residence addresses of each of its current officers arc] directors, arc] of each stockholder holding more than five percent (5$) of the stork of that corporation. "13. If the applicant is a partnership, the application shall set forth the name and residence addresses of each of the partrwss, including limited partners. If the applicant is a limited partrwi~stlip, it shall furnish a copy of its certificate of limited ~ rinc,~~.;p as file3 with the Crnmty Clerk. If one or more of the partriers is a mrporation, the provisions of silsection 9.24.040(d)12 pertaining to corporate applicants shall apply. "l4. 'ihe applicant, if a corporation, or partnership, shall designate one (1) of its officers or general partners to act as its responsible managing emq~loyee. rich person stall amplete and sign all application forms required of an iniividual applicant under this Chapter, however, only one (1) application fee shall be charged. the mrporation's or partnership's responsible managing employee must, at all tines, meet all of the requirements established for permittees by this Chapter or the corporation or partnership permit shall be suspeTded until a responsible managing e~loyee who meets such requirements is designated. If no such person is determitnd within ninety (90) days, the corporation or , rtro,~hip permit shall be deems] canoelad without further notice a=d a new initial application for permit must be filed. "15. 'ihe Director may require the applicant to furnish finger- prints when needed for the purpose of establishing identification. Any recp~ired fuxlerprintirg fee will be the responsibility of the applicant. "16. Iwo (2) portrait (^pass,~xrt") photographs of the applicant, two (2) inches Iry two (z) inches in size. "17. A description of any other business to Ue operated on the same premises, or on adjoining premises, ownad or controlled by the applicant. "7.8. 'Ike Hann and address of the saner and lessor of the real property upon or in which the husiness is tc be conducted. In the event the applicant is rot the legal caner of the property, the application must be arxaq~anied by a copy of the lease arc] a notarized aclawwledg`mnt from the owner of the property that a massage establishmmnt will be located on his/her proPe-rty • ~ '1 ordinance No. 485 Page 6 "19. Authorization for the City of Rancho cticamrga, its agents arcs employees to seek information atd corrtuct an investigation into the truth of the statements set forth in the application. "20. The applicant shall sukmit any change of address or fact 'w'hich may occur during the procedure of applyirxl for a massage establishment permit. "21. The applicant, if an individual, or designated responsible maragirx7 ercq~loyee if a partnership or corporation, shall personally appear at the PcLtinistrative Services Departrnt and produce prmf that the application fee has been paid and shall present the application containing the required information as described in this Section. "22. A certificate of mrtq~liance from both the City of Rancho cL'camonga Community Developrmnt Depaztmeirt, Building and Safety Division, and the San Bernardino County Health Department must be submitted prior to the application approval. Arty required inspection fees shall 6e the responsi- bility of the applicant. "If the certificates of <~liance are not receivs3 by the Director within ninety (90) days of the date of filing, the application shall he deemed void. If any land use permit or other entitlement for use is required, such permit or entitlement for use shall be applied for and received prior to the massage establishment permit becoming effei~tive. "23. the Director shall have up to sixty (60) calendar days to investigate the application and the background of the applicant. Upon the mrtpletion of the irnestigation, the pirector shall grant the permit if he or she finds: "(a) The required fee has been paid. "(b) The application conforms in all respects to the provisions of this Chapter. "(c) 'the applicant has not made a material misrepresenta- tion in the application. "(d) 'ihe applicant, if an individual, or any of the stock- holders of the corporation, or any officers or directors, if the applicant is a corporation, or any pa.~-tner if the applicant is a partnership, has not been convicted in a court of migxtent jurisdiction of an offense involvirxl conduct which requires registration order California Penal Ccde Section 290, or of conduct which is a violation of the provisions of California Penal Cade Sections 314, 315, 316, 318, 647, or any other crime involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or moral. turpitude. "(e) The applicant has not had a massage establishment, massage technician, or other similar permit or license denied, revokai, or suspended by the City, or any other State or local agency prior to the date of approval. "(f) 'Ihe applicant is at least eighteen (18) years of age. `1 S Ordinance No. 485 Page 7 "(g) The massage establishment as proposed by the applicant would mnply with all applicable laws, including, but not limited tn, health, zoning, fire, arcs safety requirements arc? star.-ia,~.a~, "24. If the Director, following investigation of the applicant, determines that the applicant does not fulfill the requirements a• set forth in this Chapter, the Director shall deny said application by dated written notice to the applicant. The applicznt shall have the right of appeal as set forth in Section 9.24.440. "" ion 9.24.050 -Same - One.ati Reauirements 'TIO person Shall erxiage ]It, Cotduct, Or CdrT}' on, Or Permlt t0 be engaged in, corclucts3, or carried on, any massage establishment, unless each and all of the follvriirg requirements are met: "(a) Each Person employed or acting as a massage technician shall have a valid permit issued by the Director. It shall he unlawful for any owner, manager, operator, responsible managing e~loyee, or perrtitteQ in charge of or in control of a massage establishment to ertq~loyee or pernut a person to act as a massage technician who is not in possession of a valid, unrevoked massage technician permit issued ~wrsuant to this Chapter and whid~ is worn clearly visible during working hours. "(b) The possession of a valid Massage Establishment Permit does not authorize the Possessor to perform work for which a Massage 'technician Permit is required. "(c) Massage and bath operations shall 6e carried on or mrducted, and the premises shall be open, only between the hours of 7:00 o'clock a.m. and 10:00 o'clock p. m. "(d) A list of sec. vices available and the cost of such services shall be posted in an open public Place within the premises, and shall be. described in readily understardable language. No owner, manager, operator, responsible managing ertq~loyee, or permittee shall permit, arcl no massage technician shall offer or perform, any ser~icr: other than those posted. "(e) 'Ihe Massage Establishment t~nnit and a copy of the permit of each arcl every massage technician enq~loyed in the establishment shall 6e displayed in an open and conspicuous place on the premises. "(f) Every massage establishment shall keep a written record of the date and hour of each treatment, the Wane and address of each customer or client, the name of the massage technician administering the treatment, arcl the type of treatment administered. Su:h «Titten record shall be maintaincYl in form approved by the Director. SUCK records shall to open to inspection only try officials charged with enforcement of this Qiapter arc] shall be i:sed for no other purpose, vicluding use of the file by ogners and employees of the establishment. Any unauthorized disclosure or use of such information by any officer or employee of the City or the county of San Bernardino, or the owner or employee of the massage establish^ier.t shall constitute a misdemeanor and such persons shall be subject to the penalty of the provisions of this Qupter IW Ordinance No. 485 Page 8 in addition to any other penalties provided by law. Such rewrds shall be maintained on the premises of the massage establishment for a period of two (2) Years. "(g) Massage establishments shall at all t1npS to equipped with an adaluate supply of clean, sanitary towels, coverings, and linens. Clean towels, coverings and linens shall be stored in enclosed cabinets. 'Towels and linens shall not be used on more than one (1) custarex~ or client, unless such towel or linen has first bePS laurdeted and disinfectril. Dispc~able towels am] coverings shall not be used on more than one (1) customer or client. Soiled linens and paper tvvels shall be deposited in separate, approved receptacles. "(h) If male and female custamss or clients aze to be treated simultaneow^ly at the same massage establishment, a separate massage roan or roorts, separate dressing facilities and separate toilet facilities shall be provided For male arcs female custai~exs or clients. "(i) Wet and dry heat rooms, steam or vapor roans or cabinets, toilet rows, shcwwi- aril bath rooms, tannircg booths, whirlpool baths and pools shall 6e thoroughly cleaned and disinfected as needed, and at least once each day the premises are open, with a disinfectant approved by the San Hernaiiiira County Health Depu tn~ent. 6athtuks shall be thoroughly cleangi with a disinfectant approved by the Health Depu-t~mnt after each use, All walls, ceilings, floors, and other physical facilities of the establishment must be in good repair and maintained in a clean and sanitary corclition. "(7) Instruments utilized in performing massage shall not 6e used on more than one (1) custrnar or client unless such instruments have been sterilized, using approved sterilizing methods. "(k) All erployees, including massage technicians, shall b? clean, and wear clean, nnn-transparent outer garments. Said garrierrts shall not expose their genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or chest. Massage technicians shall maintain the massage technician permit visibly on their person durircl business hours. "(1) No person shall enter, be or remain in any part of a message establishment while in the possession of, consuming, under the influence of or using any a'coholic beverage or drugs except pursuant to a prescription for such drugs. 'the owner, operator, responsible managing en~loyee, manager, or pemittee shall not permit any such per-son to enter or remain upon such premises. "(m) No massage establishment she 11 operate as a sthool of massage, or use tho, same facilities as that of a soliml of massage. "(n) No massage establishment granted a permit wider this Article shall place, publish or distribute or cause to be places, published or distrituted any advertising matter that depicts any portion of the human body that would reasonably suggesk to prospective customers or clients that env service is available other than those services described in Section 9.24. o50 (d) of this Article, nor shall any massage es4ablishment or out call :mssage service employ language in the text of such advertising that would reasonably suggest to a prospective patron that any service is available other than those services as de :- :Fa.; in 5?ction 9.24.OSO(d) of this Article. y~ Ordiiwice No. 465 Page 9 "(o) No service ernnperated in Section 9.24.050 (d) of this Article may be carried on within airy cubicle, room, booth or any azea within a massage establishment, which is fitted with a door capable of being locked. "(p) All exterior doors shall remain unlocked fran the interior side during business hours. "(q) A massage shall not be given arcl no custaner or client shall be in the presence of a massage technician or other et~loyee unless the aistaner's or client's genitals are fully covered by a non-transparent coveri.lg and, in addition, a female customer's or client's breasts are fully covered by anon-transparent covering. "(r) No massage establishment shall be open for business without at least one (1) massage technician on the premises at all times who is in possession of a current, unrevoked ~ *+~; t. "Sec-tion 9.24.060 -Same -Facilities "Every passage establishment shall maintain facilities nieetitg all of the following requirements: "(a) Any signs shall he in wnformance with the c~urent oxdinanees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. "(b) Miniminn lighting shall be provided in asordanoe with Article 220 of the National Electric Code or successor provision or provisions, and, in addition, enax¢~ lighting shall be provided in each roan or enclosure where passage services are performed on custoers or clients to provide a minipann of seventy foot (75') carclle light intensity at three feet (3') above the floor and the same shall be energized and operational at all times when massage services are being performed therein. "(c) Minimum ventilation shall be provided in accordance with Section 1105 of the Uniform Building Code or successor provision or provisions. "(d) Adequate equipment for disinfecting and sterilizing instruments used in performing the acts of massage shall be provided. "(e) Hot and cold running water shall be provided at all times. "(f) Clr¢.ed cabinets shall be provided for storage of clean .linens. "(g) Adequate ka3thiuq, drevsirg, locker and toilet facilities shall ke provided for custopwss or clients. A minimum of one (1) tub or shower and a dressing roan containing separate lockers which are capable of being locked must be provided for each custarier or client. Separate toilets and wash basins must be provided for male and female customers or clients. "(h) A minipnpn of one (1) separate wash basin for employees shall be provided at all times. 'Ihe basin shall be located within or as close as practicable to the area devoted to performing of massage services. Sanitary towels shall also be provided at each basin. '~~ 8 Oxrlinance No. 485 Page 10 "(i) Pads ;iced on massage tables shall be covered with a durable, washable plastic or other waterproof material acceptable to the San Betn'rrdino County Health Department. "(j) Proof of cacpliance with all applicable provisions of the Parxho Cucamonga Municipal Nde and all applicable laws, o**'J; narr~at aryl regulations shall he provided prior to the i of arty permits. "Section 9.24.070 -Sarre -Inspections '"Ihe Chief of Police, Director of Community Develogrent, Director atd the San E3errtvdino Clarnty Health Department, or their authorized representa- tives, shall have the right to enter the massage establishment for the purpose of making reasonable unscheduled inspections to otserve and enforce en~liance with applicable regulations, laws, and provisions of this Chapter. "Section 9 24.080 -Permit iJOn-assicmable "No massage establishment permit may be sold, transferred or assigrrd by the permitteP, or by operation of law, to arty other person or persons, and any such sale, transfer or assiegm~ent, or attecipted sale, transfer or assign ment, shall be deemed to mrvtitute a wluntary surrender of such permit and such permit shall thereafter be deemed t=.mi*+ated and void; provided and exceptirq, however, that if the permittee is a nart:erchip and one (1) or more of the partners should die, one (1) or more of the surviving partners may acquire, by pure2rase or otherwise. the interest of the deceased partner or partners without effecting a surrender or re.m;nation of such permit and in each case the permittee shall thereafter be deems] to be the surviving parnter(s) • one (i) or more proposed partners in a partevr~v`;p granted a permit hereunder may make application to the Director, together with the fee original application providing all information as require] for partners in the first instance and, upon approval thereof, the transfer of the interests of one (1) or more partners to the propose] partner or partners may oars. If the permit is issuer] to a corporation, stock may tie sold, transferred, issued, or. assigned to a person not listed on the application as a sTeekholder, the permit shall be deemed terminated and void; provided, however, the proposed transfere° may sukmit to the Director, together with a fee established bi' the City Council, an application to amend the original application providing all information as required for stockholders in the first instarxe, and, upon approval thereof, the transfer ray then occur "Section 9.24.090 =Chance of iecation or Name "(a) A change of location of a massage establishment may be approved by the Director provided all ordinances and regulations of the City of Pandno Cucamonga are acaipliel with. "(b) No pennittee shall operate order any name or conduct any establishment order arty designation not specified in the permit, "(c) Any application for an expansion of a building or other place of bus mess of a massage establishment shall require conq~liance with Section 9.24.060 of this Article. -l I Ordinance No. 485 Page 11 "Section 9.24.100 - Massage Establishment Notification of Charae "(a) 'Ihe holder of the permit to operate or mrciuct a massage establishment shall notify the Director, in writing, of the name and address of each person enq~loyed, including massage technicians, at such establishmalrt within five (5) days of said person being enq~lcyed. "The requirements of this Section aze in addition to the other provisions of this Article, and nothing contained herein shall relieve the permittee of the responsibility of acrerta inirg, prior to engoloyment, whether an ert~loyee has a current, unrewksl Massage Teciv~ician Permit. "(b) If, during the term of a permit, the applicant has any clwrge in information providad on or mrxrrni~ the original application or permit renewal application, notification must 6e made to the Duector in writing, within ten (10) business days of the charge. "Section 9.24.110 -Same -Renewal cf Permit "A massage establishment licensed order this Qiapter shall submit an application for renewal thirty (30) days prior to the expiration thereof. 'ihe renewal application shall 6e sutxni.tted together with the requisite fee as establishe3 1Ti' the City Council. Approval of the renewal application shall he contingent ton satisfactory ecr~q~liance with all pertinent provisions of this Qiapter. "Section 9 24 720 - Aoolicability of Regulations to Existi Eusinesses "The provisions of this Article shall be applicable to all persons and kusinesses described herein whether the described activities were established before or after the effective date of this Article, except that massage establishments legally in business prior to the effective date hereof shall have one Itundrsl eighty (180) calendar days or until the expiration of their clurent business license, whichever is greater, to crnq~ly with the terms hereof. Al7PLCL,E II - I+@SSAGE TEI7RJICIANS "Sec-lion 9 24 200 -Massage Technicians -Permit Required "(a) Zt shall 6e unlawful for any person to engage in the Lxvsiness of acting or to act as a massage technician unless such person holds a valid trassage technician permit issued by the City. Each massage terlvrician permit holder shall be issuad a photo identification badge which will also serve as a massage technician permit. 'Ihe permit holder shall maintain the massage technician permit visibly on his or her person during business hours. Each p~imit holder shall inmediately surrender to the Director any massage tethnician permit issuc~l by the city upon the suspelLSion, revocation, or expiration of such permit. "(b) A permit under this Section shall be valid for twelve (12) months from the date of issuance unless revoked or suspended. So Ordinance No. 485 Page 12 "section 9 24 210 - Same Application "(a) Faclr applicant for a massage technician permit shall make application order penalty of perjury to the Director. Prior to sutmittirq an application, a raru~efundable fee as established by the City (burrcil shall be paid to help defray the cxrsts of investigation and report required by this Article. A SPY of the receipt shall ac~ngxny the application. "(b) Permit fees required urx9er this section shall 6e in addition to any license, permit or fee required under any other Section or Chapter of this mde. "(c) The application far permit does not authorize the applicant to practise massage until such permit has been granted. "(d) Fac3r applicant for a massage technician permit shall subnit the follvring information: "1. Fach and every fact or inquiry set forth in Sections 9.24.040 (d)7 through 9.24.040 (d)7, inclusive, of Article I of this Chapter. "2. Acceptable written proof that the applicant is at least eighteen (18) years of age. ^(e) The applicant mast furnish a diploma or certificate of graduation fran a minimmr 100-hour ~ir:~ of instnrction fran either: "1. A recognized school of massage as defined in Section 9.24.010 (h) of Article I of this Chapter; or "2. An existirq school or institution of learning outside the State of California, together with a certifisi transcript of the applicant's school records showing date of enrolLnerrt, hours of instruction and graduation from a ewrse having at least the minimum ra3uirements prescribed by Title 5, Division 21, of the California Code of Regulations, wherein the theory, method, profession acrd wrk of massage is taught, and a orny of the school's approval bS' its State Beard of Fducation. "(f) Tfie massage establisYment's full name, address and teiephore number where the ~o technician will be e>rployad at a fixed place of tusiness. 1'n the event the applicant seeks to conduct out call massage services not listed in the original application, a separate application and fee must be submitted. "(g) Stroh other identification and information as the Director may require in order to discover the truth of the matters herein specified as required to be set forth in the application. "(h) TWn (2) portrait ("passport") photographs of the applicant, twro (2) inches by two (2) inClres in site. "(i) The Director may require the applicant to furnish fingerprints when needed for the purpose of establishirrq identification. Any required fingerprinting foes will be the responsibility of the applicant. 5~ ordinance No. 485 Page 17 "(j) A certificate from a medical doctor licensed to practice in the State of Cali.:omia stating that the applicant has, within thirty (30) days in¢~d.iately nrn-rag; ~ the date of application, been examined atd fount to 6e free of arty contagious or miarwnicable disease. "(k) Authorization for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its agents and enrnloyees to seek information and rAnduct an investigation into the truth of the statements set forth in the application• "(1) 'Ihe Director shall have up to sixty (60) calendar days to investigate the application and the bac'cgrourcl of the applicant. Upon conpletion of the investigation, shall grant the pe_rnit if he or she finds in actirordance with Section 9.24. o40 (d)23 (a) through (f), inclusive; arcl "1. 'Ihe applicant has furnished an ameptable diploma or certificate of graduation fran a recrognized school; or "2. 'the applicant has furnished written proof frcan a recognized school that the minimrnn numlpx of hours of instruction have been cxmq~leted. "(m) if the Cirector, follaaing investigation of the application, detei3nines that the applicant does not fulfill the requirements as set forth in this Section, the Director shall deny said application by dated, written notice. Any applicant for a permit who is refused a permit by the Director may appeal the denial as set forth in Section 9.24.440. "Section 9.24.220 -Same -Renewal "A massage technician licensed under this Chapter shall file an application to renew the permit thirty (30) days prior to the date of expira- tion thereof. Approval shall he contingent won satisfactory ccnpliarx~ with all pertinent sections of this Artic~e, including a current medical clearance. A renewal fee as established by the City Council shall be charged to defray, in part, the amt of the renewal investigation rc~uired by this Article. "SeC'tion 9.24.230 -Sane - NOtlflcation by TeChnrcian "If, during the term of a permit, the massage technician has arty :hange in infoniution suLmitttd during the original application, or renewal thereof as the rase may Ix, the massage technician shall notify the Director of such change within ten (10) business days thereof, in writing. "AR'T'ICLE III - Orly f`Aii NWSSAGE SERVICES '!Section 9._24.300 -Out Call Nassaae Services -Special IIdorsement Rc~7uirei "It shall be unlawful for any massage establishment or massage technician to provide, or to offer to provide, massage at any location except at the place of business approved for a massage establishment hereunder; Rr ovidad, harev=x, that a massage establishment or massage technician may obtain a special endorsement to the pernut issues thereto specifically authorizing out call massage services. sz Ordinance No. 485 Page 14 "Sei-tion 3.24.310 -Sane - *+olicat~on "Arty massage establishment or massage technician desiring to provide out call masexc services shall sulanit to the Director, together with the requisite nonrefundable fee therefor as established by the City Council, an application to provide out call massage services within the City of Rancho clrcamonga. >r addition to the requirenrnts set forth herein pertaining to passage establishment permit or massage technician permit application, as the case may be, the applicant shall sukmit detailed information setting forth the mariner arc] mearvs of transporting, to and from the premises where nut call massage servirns are to be perform, the clean, sanitary tarels, coverings and linens, sterilized irt,tr~nnentr to be utilized, as well as any supplemen- tary aids, equi(xros~t or devicss to be utilized and the method(s) of disposal thereof. "Section 9.24.320 -Same -Records "All massage technicians authorized to perform out call nuccago services hereunder shall keep a written record, at the massage technician's principal place of business, a separate record of out call massage services performed as ranrired by, and subject to the restrictions of, Section 9.24.050 (f) of Article I hereof and shall include therein the location, try street address, including suite or apar-taent number, where such services have Keen perform. "ARI'ICT,E N - PROHIBTTID NNIXKT, PROCIDURFS, AND PEW~LT'IFS "Section 9.24.400 -Prohibited Co.+fi3ct "(a) It shall be unlawful for any massage technician to massage the genital area of arty cwtaner or client or the breasts of any female customer or client or for any massage establishmw~t to allv.~ or permit such massage. "(b) Massage technicians shall be fully clothsi in non-trar~sEvrent clcthing at all times that shall not expose their genitals, pubic area, tuttocks, or chest. "(c) It shall be unlawful for a massage technician to perform any massage services at any location other than that location specif lad on the massage technician permit. "section 9 24 410 - ~ slop Pendi Revocation "when the grounds for revocation under this Article are that the permittce is suspects] of immoral, irkroper, or otherwise objectionable conduct, the permit may to suspends] until the revocation hearing procedure has been cxx;Q~leted. "Section 9.24.420 -Revocation -Massage £stablishment Permit "The Director shall revoke the massage establis}~ment permit of any person, firm, partrwsship or corporation holding the same upon receipt of satisfactory evidence that the permittee has made a material nusrepresentation on the permit application, or if the permittee, any managing responsible 53 Ordinance, No. 465 Page 15 employee thereof or any of the persons enumerated in Sec.-lions 9.24.040 (d)12 or 9.24.040 (d)13 of Article I of this chapter has been convicted of or e~=*-u~ a plea of guilty or polo contesdere to any charge of a violation of any of the provisions of this ~apr=r, or of the ernnrerated statutes set forth in 9.24.040 (d)7 of Article I cf this Chapter or any lesser included offense. 'lhe Director may revcke, after notice and hearing, a massage establishment permit if, on the basis of satisfactory evidence, it is sham that the permittee, any managing responsible e:fp~ loyee, or any etr~loyee, representative, or agent of the permittee or any massage technician employed by the pexnittee, has engagsi in conduct constituting a violation of this Chapter or of any of the enumerated statutes set forth in Section 9.24.040(d)7 of Article I of this Chapter. The Director shall provide the permittee with written notice of the revocation or proposed revocation by certified mail addressed to the street address of the massage establishment as shown on the application. '!Section 9.24.430 -Same - Massaee Technician Permit "'It±e Director shall revoke the massage technician permit of airy person holding the same upon receiving satisfactory evidence that the permittee has made a material misrepresentation on the permit application or if the perruttee has been convicted of or entered a plea of guilty or polo mnterdere to any charge of a violation of any of the provisions of this chapter, or any of the enumerated statutes set forth in Section 9.24.040 (d)7 of Article I of this Chapter or to a lesser included offense. The Director may, after notice and hearing, revoke the massage technician permit of any permittee if, on the basis of satisfactory evidence it shows that the permi.ttee has engaged in conduct constituting a violation of this Chapter or any of the ernmierated statutes set forth in Section 9.24.040id)7 of Article I of this Chapter, The Director shall provide the pennittee with written notice of the revocation by certified mail addressed to the permittee at the address of record sham on the massage technician permit application. '!Section 9.24.440 -Permit Denial/Revocation n al Procedure "'ihe applicant or permittee, as the case may be, within ten (l0) business days after receipt of denial of an application fora permit order either Article I or Article II, hereof, or notice of revocation, may file an appeal with the City Clerk to he taken to the Hearing Officer. In the event an appeal is filed within the ten (l0) day time frame, a suspension may be in effect until the final decision has been rendered by the Hearing Officer. "If the applicant or permittee fails to make an appeal within the ten (10) day fi1Lq period provided herein, denial/revocation shall take effect i,-r_rliately upon expiration cf such filing period. No permit shall to re•.rokad until after a hearing shall have lxas held cefore the Hearing Offioer to determ i.ne gmd cause for such revocation, or the appeal filing period has lapsed. It is unla'.uful for any person to conduct a massage establishment or carry on the tus iness of massage until the revoked permit has been reinstates by the HeariixJ Officer. ^NOti.ce of such hearin7 shall !~e given in writing and mailed at least ten (l0) days prior to the date of the hearing, by certified mail, addressed to the address listed on the massage establishment application, or massage terhnician application, as the Case „ay be. S`1 Ordinance No. 485 Page 16 "'Ihe notice shall state the grounds of the conq~laint arr] shall state the time and place where such hearing will be held. "After said hearing, the Hearing Officer shall render a written decision within ten (10) ].usiness days from the date the matter is sukmitted for decision. The action of the Henri,-g Officer shall 6e final and conclusive. "Section 9.24.450 -Burden of Proof at Hearinr+ "Unless otherwise specifically provided ty law, the burden is on the permittee/applicant in any hearing under this Article to prove that the deter- mi~tion of the Director which is being appealed is unreasonable, erroneous, or clearly alz><sive of discretion. '!Section 9.24.460 -Penalties for Violation of Chatter "It shall he unlawful for any person, firm, partnnershlp, or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the ra]uirements of this Chapter. Any person, firm, part nip or corporation violating any provisions of this Chapter. or failing to ccmrply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished try a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or lry inrPriso:mvst not exceeding six (6) months, or try both such fine and i~risonment. Fach and every person, firm, partnership, or corpora- tion shall he deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of arty of the provisions of this chapter is cofmnittecl, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership or corporation, and shall to deemed punishable therefor as provided in this chapter. "Section 9.24.470 -Civil Remedies Available "TT:e violation of any of the provisions of this Ctuapter shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the city through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permana~t injunction or in any other manner provided Fry law for the abatefrent of such nuisances. "Section 9.24.480 - Severability "'Ihe City Council declares that, should any provision, section, pazagraph, sentence or word of this chapter be rendered or declazed invalid by any final court action in a court of cmigxtent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislative, the refraining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Chapter shall remain in full force and effect." SECPION 2: The Mayor sha 11 sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inl<vd Vallev Dai lv_BUlletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontazio, California, and circulated in the City of IiwfGfo Ncamonga, California. ss oRDUUwcE Nc. 4ae AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CO[,'NCIL OF Tiff CTIY OF RANCHO CUCAFYNI('~f, CALIkbRNIA, APPROVING DEVECOPMfM' CDDE AMfT1D- Fff371' 91-05, A+ffNDIIJG TITLE 17, C4API'FR 17.02.140 OF THE RANCHO C[1CAhbNGA MUflICIPAL NDE 'ro REVISE Ti$ DFFINITION OF MASSAGE ESIABLISHhIDTf, AND MAI~tG FLNDIIJGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does herelry ordain as follows: SIX,'1'ION 1: Section 17-02.140 is revised to read as follows: MASSAGE FSTABLI57PffNP: Arty establishment havirx7 a fixed place of kusiness where any person, firm, association, partriership, or corporation engages in, conducts, or carries on, or permits to be engage] in, mrrlucted, or carries on, any business of giving massages, baths, acLninistration of fomentation, electric or magnetic treatments, almhol ruts, or any other type of system for treatment or manipulation ~of the human body with or without any character of bath, such as Turkish, Russian, Swedish, Japanese, vapor, shower, electric tub, sponge, mineral, fomentation, or any other type of bath. Massage establishments shall not include the following: a. Physicians, surgeons, chiropractors, osteopaths, or physical therapists who are duly licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. b. Nurses registered under Use laws of the State of California. c. Harbers and beauticians who are duly licensed under the laws of the State of California while engaging in practice within the scope of their licenses, except that this provision shall apply solely to the passaging of the neck, face, and/or scalp of the customer or client. d. I:ospitals, nursing hors, ~~natcriims, or other health care facilities duly licensed frf tl:e :,tste of California. e. Accredited high schoc l:, ;un for colleges, and colleges or universities wrtrese coaches :n,i trainers are acting within the scope of their epq~loyment. f. Trainers of amateur, sem.prof.PSSional, or professional athletes oT arhletic teams. SECTION 2: 'This Council finds t';ut t::is ,~^iendrieht is not considered a project by the California Fhvironmentnl ;^..ality Ad and is, therefore, exenq~t (see Article 5, cemm~aicing with Scxt.cn l~,i;r>li ~~ rndinarxe No. 486 Page 2 SEr'1'TON 3: 'Ihe City Council declares that, should arty provision, section, pararA aPh. ~t~-~, or word of this Ordinance he rendered or declare3 irnalid by any final mart action in a cwrt of rn~@etent jurisdio- tion, or by reason of arty preehq~tive legislation, the rasnainirg provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentenms, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full form. and effect. SfCPION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordirarr-e and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after fi 9~adropt circulation pablish~ the Citylof 113i1v Bulletin, a neaspapes' Ontario, and circulated in the City of Rambo Cucamonga. i S1 ORDINANCE N0. 487 AN ORDINANCE OF 'iHE CITY WUNCIL OF 'IFIE CI'Pl OF RANCHO CUCA[3C7NGA, CALIFbRNIA, AR4NDING SECPION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO cZKADDN('•A CPPY CODE Rf~ARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEtD LII4P15 ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals. (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that this City council may, try ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state higtrvray. (ii) The City Traffic Engineer has mrductxd an erquleerug and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of this ordinance. (iii) 'ihe determinations concerning Prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, bela.~, are based upon the en7ineerirg and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above. 8. Ordinance. NCIn', 1}IIItEEORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Qrcanorga does hereby ordain as follows: SECPION 1: Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10 20 020 Dec,-rease of sate law maximum sneecl. It is determined try City Council resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted br' state law is greater than is reasonable or safe order the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declazed that the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or Farts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: Declazed Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed limit (MPI1) 1. Archibald Ave. -Banyan St. to north end 50 2. Archibald Ave. - 4th St. to Banyan St. 45 3. Arrow Rt. -Baker Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 4. Baker Ave. - 8th St. to Foothill 61vd 35 5. Banyan St. from Beryl St. to Inndon Ave. 35 6. Banyan St. from :rest City Limits to Beryl St. 40 7. Base Line Ida. -west City limits to Carnelian st. 45 8. Base Luce Rd. -Carnelian St. to Hermosa Ave. 40 9. Base Line Rd. - Elerngsa Ave. to Spruce Ave. 45 10. Beryl St. -Banyan St. to end 45 il. Beryl St. - 800' N/o Lemon Ave. to Banyan St. 40 12. Canistel Ave. -Wilson Ave. to Antietam Dr. 35 13. carnelian St. -Vineyard Ave. to end 45 S~ Occlinanoe No. 487 Page 2 Declared Prima Facie Name of .Street or Portion Affected Sneed Limit (I+~H1 14. Centel Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Church St. 40 15. Qvrr11 St, Archibald Ave. to FUn St. 40 16. East Ave. - Base Line Rd. to Highlard Ave. 45 17. 8th SC. -Grove Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 18. Etiwanda Ave. - Foothill B1W., to Summit Ave. 45 19. Fairmont Dr. - Milliken Ave. to east erxl 35 20. Fredricksknsg Ave. - Banyan St. to Seven Pines Dr. 35 21. GYOVe Ave. - 8th St. to Foothill Blvd. 40 22. Haven Ave. - 4111 St. to Wilson Ave. 45 23. Hellman Ave. - Foothill Blvd.. to Alta Lena IIr. 35 24. Hellman Ave. - 500' N/o Manzanita Dr. to Valley View 40 25. Hellm'jn Ave. - 6th St. to Foothill Blvd. 45 26. Henrc~a Ave. - Base Line &l. to Wilson Ave. 45 27. Hermosa Ave. - Wilson Ave. to 51m Valley Dr. 40 28. Hermosa Ave. - 8th St. to Base Dine Rl. 45 29. Highlarrl Ave. - Sapphire St. to Carnelian St. 40 30. Highland Ave. -Amethyst St. to Hernnsa Ave. 35 31. Highland Ave. - Hernc~sa Ave. to 800' W/o Haven Ave. 45 32. Hillside Rd. - Rarx3i Gate to Amethyst St. 35 33. Hillside Rd. - Amethyst St. to Haven Ave. 40 34. Hillside Fd. - Haven Ave. to Ganistel Ave. 35 35. Leann Ave. - Jasper St. to Beryl St. 35 36. Lemon Ave. - Archibald Ave. to Haven Ave. 40 37. Lemon Ave. - Haven Ave. to Highland Ave. 40 38. Manzanita Dr. - Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 35 39. Mountain View Dr. - Spruce Ave. to Milliken Ave. 40 40. 9th St. - Baker Ave. to Archibald Ave. 40 41. Red Hill Gauntry Club Dr. - Foothill Blvd. to Alta cuesta 35 42. RoUester Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Ri. 40 43. San Bernardino Isl. - Vineyard Ave. to Archibald Ave 35 44. Sa~hise St. - Banyan St. to end 45 45. Sapphire St. - 19th St. to lemon Ave. 40 46. 7th St. - Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave. 45 47. Spruce Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 40 48. Terra Vista Pazkway - Church St. W Belpine P1. 40 49. Victoria St. - Archibald Ave. to Ramona Ave. 35 50. Victoria St. - E2iwarcla Ave. to Rt. 15 40 51, Victoria St. - Haven Ave. to Mendocino P1. 40 57. Victoria Park In. - Fairmont Way to Base Line Isl. 35 53. Victoria Windrows Ioop (north & south) 35 54. Vineyard Ave. -Church St. to Base Line Rd. 40 55. Vineyard Ave. - Bth St. to Carnelian Ave. 45 56. Vintage f1r. - Milliken Ave. to east end 35 57. Wh ittram Ave. - Etiwanda Ave. to east City lirti~s 40 58. Wilson Ave. - Amethyst Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 59. Wilson Ave. - Haven Ave. to 200' east of Canistel Ave. 40 (OCd. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho cUCam onga 5/D2 124 SC~ Ordinance No. 487 Page 3 (i) Hoth sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per has are speeds whim are more than are reasorable or safe; and (ii) 'fie miles per hair as stats3 are the prima facie spells which aze mcet appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits whic3~ are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thermf; and (iii) 'the miles per has stated are herety declazed to to the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (iv) the Traffic Digineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie Speer] limit declared herein. SECPION 2: 'fie City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to he published as required bi' law. SECTION 3: 'Ihe Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the city Clerk shall cause the same to he published within fifteen (15) days after its ; a=~;e at least aloe in the Inland Daily ~lletin, a newspaper of gerwral circulation published in the. City of Ontario, California, and cirwlated in the City of Parx3~o Cucamonga. ~; L -- - - CiTl' OF RAN('H~) C;'(',1MOKGA STAFF REPORT ~..~C; ;~~ DATE: March 4, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT FINAL REPORT FOR AB 939'S SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT The City Council adopt the Final Report for AB 939's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) by Resolution as required by AB 939 legislation. The State of California passed AB 939 legislation on September 29, 1989. This legislation requires cities and counties in the State of California to develop and adopt solid waste management plans. The specific requirements of this legislation mandate cities and counties to reduce their solid waste by 25% by 1995 and 50% by the Year 2000. The legislation also allows cities and counties to develop funding components to pay for the costs associated with developing and implementing local agencies' solid waste management plans. An essential part of the State's comprehensive legislation for solid waste management is the provision for solid waste handling on a regional basis for the purposes of preservation of health and safety and the well-being of the public. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Final Report AB 939 March 4, 1992 Page Two plan was developed in conjunction with the County of San Bernardino's AB 939 Task Force and specifically the West End Coalition made up of the County of San Bernardino and the cities of Chino, Montclair, and Upland. The West End coalition contracted with SCS Engineers to develop the required SRRE and HHWE for all five agencies. The individual entities of the West End Coalition are required to submit separate SRRE and HHWE reports. The attached document is the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Final Report far its SRR and HHW Elements. The SRR Element is contained in two documents. Volume I includes the following sections: `Introduction 'Waste Generation Gomponent 'Source Reduction Component 'Composting Component 'Special Wastes Component 'Education and Public Information Component 'Disposal Facility Capacity Component 'Funding Component 'Plan Integration Gomponent Also included in this volume is the Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Element. As stipulated in subsequent legislation to AB 939, AB 182o requires aself-standing document which has been bound with the SRRE for ease of evaluation and distribution. ~p Z Final Report AB 939 March 4, 1992 Page Three Volume II includes the three required technical studies used to prepare the SRR Element and includes the following: 'Waste Disposal Characterization 'Waste Diversion Characterization 'Waste Generation Projection This Volume was prepared in conjunction with the West End Coalition and will be submitted as one document to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). The CIWMB is the State's designated entity to carry out and regulate this legislation. The planning process and the tormat of this report follow the guidelines set forth in the CIWMB regulations. The process includes (1) assessment of existing conditions and programs; (2) identification of a number of possible alternatives to accomplish program objectives in source reduction, recycling, composting, and puhlic education; (3) evaluation of each alternative using a list of criteria provided in the regulations; (4) selection of those alternatives that are appropriate to the jurisdiction's situation; (5) identification of the sources of funds to pay for all of the selected programs; and (6) development of an integrated plan that combines all of the selected programs to meet the diversion goals. The Final Report provides this information and is attached under separate cover. The legislation does require an assessment as to whether the Final Report will require an Environmental Impact Report or the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Tha project has been reviewed and l~ 3 Final Report AB 939 March 4, 1992 Page Four considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and can be adopted with the issuance of a Negative Declaration. The Resolution for adopting the Negative Declaration and the Final Report is attached for the City Council's consideration. Respectfu I S mitted, lane O'Neal Management Analyst II Wu ~~s RESOLUPSON N0. 92-~+* A RFSOUJi'ICkI OF THE CTTY (S7UNCiL OF THE C'PiY OF RANCHO (11CAMON(,A, CAISFORNIA, APPROVING AB 939'5 FINAL RFFOFQ' FOR THE S(HII2CE RFDIICPiON AND RFxYCLIIY' ET,II4FIT2' AND FINAL RII~I7P FUR 1HE HOUSF}{OII7 HAZARDOUS WASTE FI,kT4SIT WHII2FAS, Assembly Bill (AB) 939, the Integrated Solid Waste Manage- ment Act of 1989, r~uires all cities and counties to prepare a car~rehensive solid waste management plan, called a Sasce Reduction and Recycling Alement (SRRE}. Sulsequent enacted legislation, AB 2707, requires the preparation of a separate Household Hazardous Waste Element (HNWE); and WHEREAS, on October 24, 1991, the City's F7rvironmental Man3ganPnt Commission conducted an advertised public hearing in accordance with Title 14, ~apter 9, Article 7.0 of the California Ints7rafPd WastE Management Board to receive testimorry regarding the Prelinu.nary Draft SR[L and HHWE. Notice of the time and place of the hearing was given as required by law; and 4UIIIiFAS, on March 4, 1992, the City Council mrrlucted an advertised public hearing to receive testimony regarding the Final Report for the SRRE and HHWE. Notice of the time and place of the hearing was given as required by law. WHEREAS, the Final Report of the SRRE and HHWE references projected costs based on current infomation which may charge due to changing laws, technologies, and other actions of other agencies which affect solid waste management. NOA, THEREFURE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby firrl and certify that the project has been reviewed and considered in mrtq~liarice with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and, further, the City Caaicil hereby issues a Negative Declaration. ~S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 4, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: Hrad Bulls [, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A.ND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-20 - SHELL OIL - Appeal of the Planning Cosmission's denial of a request to request to establish a gas station, mini-market, and car wash on a 1.31 acre parcel in the Medium Aeai de ntlal de si gnation, (e-14 dwelling unite per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Hase Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-151-17. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission re cowmen de denial of Conditional Uae Permit 91-20 through adoption of the attached Resolution. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop a 24-hour service station facility consisting of 12 gasoline di spenaing stations, a 2,152 square Eoot mini-market, and a drive-thru car wash. Under the definition contained in the Terta Vista Community Plan, service stations and their related uses (mini-market and car wash) are considered "community faci Li ti ea." As such, service stations may be Located in any coning deai gnation along Terra Vista's major arterials (Roches ter, Foothill, Base Line, and M!lllken ), subject to review and apptoVal of a Conditional Uee Permit. The Tei[a Vista Community Plan does, however, require the use to be "separated from tealdentlal uses by a street, additional Landscape setback, or other 'buffer' satisfactory to the Planning Co®tiseion." Pla nnino Covm:i esLon: The Planning Commission considered the application during three public hear in g9. Initially, the project was presented to the Planning Cormnisaion on October 9r 1991 because of the Desi qn Review Committee's cro nc er ns about the compatibility of the service station with the. existing residential unite to the north and east and potential rest dential unite to the south and west. At that meeting, the Commission felt that the concept was not acceptable and directed the applicant to return to the Desi qn Review Committee with revisions to address the following cones rna: The Site ehou ld be increased to make a substantial conttibut ion to the buffering of the Euture residential unite to [he south and west. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 91-20 - SNELL OIL March 4, 1992 Page 2 2. 7Te mini-market should be deleted. 3. The site should be increased to include all 'ingress/egress. Curing December 17, 1991, and January e, 1992, public hearing, the Planning Commdssion reviewed plane for the service station. The plans provided a minimum ten-foot landscape buffer along the south and west site boundaries of the site with a proposed 50-foot building setback and 25-foot landscape setback within the future residential project to the south and west. The proposal however, stained the mini-market use. While the proposal began to address the previous concerns, the Cosmis sion felt that the proposal did not 9o Ear enough to adequately mitigate the potential conflicts between the service station and the residential areas. The Co®isaion determined that the proposed use would create excessive noise and an intensity o£ use which is incompatible with the residential areas. As a result, the application was denied by the Coon:ission. Copies o£ the Planning Commission Staff Reports and Minutes are attached. Respa f ly sub d, Bra er City anner BH:SM: je Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Lettez of Appeal Exhibit ^B" - Planning Commission Etatf Report (dated December 11, 1991) Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Staff Report (dated Octobez 9, 1991) Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Ml notes (dated Oct obez 9, 1991) Exhibit "E"_- Planning Commission Minutes (dated December 17, 1991) Exhibit "P" - Planning Commission Ml notes (dated January 8, 1992) Exhibit ^G" - Planning Cosmission Minutes (dated January 22, 1992 Exhibit "R" - PLann inq Cosmf anion Resolution No. 92-10 Exhibit "I" - Crime Rep oats of Selected Service Station Locations Rea olution of Denial !0 1V4~~ Y January 28, 1992 City Cicrk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Ccnmr Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: ADPeaI of Eoviroomeotal Assessmeot and Coodltlonal Use Permit 91-20 The above referenced Environmental Assessment and Conditional Usc Permit was denied by th< City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission at their meeting on January 22, 1992. The applicant, Shell Oil Company, desires to appeal the Planning Commission decision and thereby forward the project to the City Council for an aDPropriate hearing. The applicant believes that the project should b< permitted for the following reasons. I. The use is permitted subject to review and approval of a conditional use permit. 2. The site is appropriately located at the corner of two major arterials. 3. The use has been buffered from adjacent projects by major arterial streets with extensive landscaping and berming on the north and east, and with the cooperation of the adjacent landowner, a major building setback on the south and west is ineludcd. 4. The project was reviewed on three separate occasions by [he D.R.C. with a recommendation of apDrovai based on Shell acquiring additional land for buffering and circulation, which waa accomplished. 5. The site has taken into consideration safe traffic patterns onto adjacent ctrecr ':.: including large access driveways. 6. The project design has located any potential noise sources at street edge, and nut provided screening in the form of a reverse station, berming, and landscaping. Shell Oil Company has taken great strides to insure that all potentially ncga!~+~c impacts have been mitigated, that the use is in conformance with the intent m nu General Plan and the Terra Vista Community Plan, and [hat the project wiil bcncf it the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Sincere) , nF nn ,~.;n ...~ , VO'=". -~~n ~~: George T cndorou FORMA Jr~N E8~ Agent for Sholl Oil Company AA1 GT/md ~131~1"~I~I~Il;ti;'.;11jYN 1 La ~ ~x~~a7- A „ ~073~7 C,+,c Came` D~ ve • Suna 100 • RanFno Cucamonga GA 91710 `~ rie~ 9892232 • FAg -~,, a~ ~;tu v .~ ran..., +4C,.Va. nr_•E-• cp~=(~oE+'~e;ES~an+r.G +aFCA, F~F'E r9Aa :E&G4 i~~aC4NE4u, aA4AGF4E4' ~;,ECquE4` CITY OF RANCHO CUCANiJNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 11, 1991 TD: Chairman and Members of the Planning Co®iseion F AO M: Drad Huller, City Planner HY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE YERM IT 91-20 SRRLL OIL - A request to ea tabliah a gas sta tlon, mini-market, and car wash on a 1.31 ac ze parcel iu the Medium Residential desl gna ti on, (8-74 dwelling unite per acre) of the Tetra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Hase Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-751-17. Related Pile: Tentative Parcel Map 73987. Staff reco®ends issuance of a Negatl ve Dec la tats on. HACRGRO UND: On October 9, 7991, the Planning Commission considered the devc Lopme nt plans for the proposed service stet ion. At that time, the Commission voiced concern about the compatibility of the service station with the surrounding residential properties. After receiving public testimony on the project, a majority of the Co®iseion felt the service station land use might work at this location provided the following issues were sa ti efactorily addressed in revised plane: 1. Greater buffering shoo ld be provided along the south and west site bounds ri ee. A majority of the butf erinq should be provided on the service station site. 2. The mini-market should be deleted. 3. The property boundaries/lot lines should be adjusted to include all improvements necessary for the service station operation (i.e., driveway, walls, landscaping, etc.) As a result, th le item was continued to allow the app Licant to revise the plans and submit them for Design Review Committee revise prior to additional consideration by the Co®Sesion. DF.SZGN REVIEW COMM ITTEB: The Oeal gn Review Committee (Chi ties, Melcher, Rroutll) originally reviewed the proposal on September Sr 1991. At that time, the Commlitee noted several architectural and site planning issues connected with the project (see October 9, 1991 staff report fuc recommendatlone ). The Committee also had ee [SOUS reservations about the compete billty of the service at at ion and the future residential units to the south end west. Ae a result, the Co®Sttee referred the projert to the Planning Cosmieslon for consideration. On November 21, 1991, the Desiyn 1 PLANNING COMM IS SIGN ! 'F REPORT COP 91-20 - SHELL OIL December 11, 1991 Page 2 Review Committee (Chilies, McNiel, Rroutil) reviewed the plans submitted by the applicant. The revised plans incorporate the Rochester driveway into the lot area anfl provide terming along the south and west boundaries to increase the height of the perimeter wall. No additional landscape area is being proposed on ^site and the service station still includes a mini^ market. The applicant chose not to address previous archi tectux'al comments until the land use issues can 6e resolved. The Committee felt tha~ the buffeting provided by the applicant was insufficient along the south and west boundaries. The Committee Fel[ Chat in order to consider the project acceptable, a minimum 5-foot (free and clear) landscape area should be provided on the service station Bite and that some assurances should be provided by the adjacent property owner that additional landscaping will be provided with the residential project to create a substantial buff ez between the two projects. The Co®ittee suggested that a minimum combined landscape area of 35 feet be explored. The applicant should revise the plane Eor additional Committee review at the meeting of December 5, 1991. In that revisions to the plan were not available at the time of the report preparations, staff will orally update the Commission to any changes that have resulted with the oropoeal. Finally, the Committee felt that Che air and water stand should be relocated from the south property line to the eastern portion of the site to minimize the noise nuisance adjacent to the residential area. CORRESPONDENCE: Additional notices were mailed to all reei dente within 500 feet of the Project site and the site was posted. RECOMMENDATION: If, after receiving all public teatlmonyr the Commies ion feels that the applicant has not satisfactorily addressed the Corm is sion's previous direction, staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of Denial. If however, the Planning Cosmie8lon fee le that the use and design as proposed are appropriate for this location, the Planning Commission should direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval with the inclusion of a condition requiring the architectural plane to be reviewed and approved by the Desl qn Review Committee gtior to the iseuan<e of building permits. The appropriate Aeaoluiion will return to the Commission on January 8, 1991, for adoption. Ae ul lye , 6r B e City sons BB:SM:js ALtachments: ExhibiC "A" - Revised Slte Plan Exhibit "B" - Revised Landscape Plan Exhibit "C" - Staff Report (dated October 9, 1991) Exhibit "D" - Planning Comm Lseion Minutes (dated October 9, 1991) ~~ ~ 1 CITY OF I2ABTC`E{Cl. S.:UCAMONGA PLANPIING DMSION -7 I ,.,~~,.,.a, o~ ,..:.:~~..,... ~~ ~ ~, ,; ~__.,~ .~ ~. E u' L lai ~u~ ~i ~p~ _ ~~ ~ 9 y~ IF" Y• TTEM: f~~ 9/- 20 TffLE: rsv~r~ cTU1~ tY~N JV EXHIBIT: ~J SCALE: _ ,~~ ~~.~ PI~1NT LEGEND w ~~ ~~ :..~~ SYVBOI CO~ANILAL NAVE LWMK.N NAME 'BEES .~s.....ma«.- a... ~.. ., ~ +.. rv... ..~. ~.a r.. rv.. +I , ~m+v SNVVftS "i +~ -.',c,- ~~ ~.. w ~~ :rawKmw ~' yip ~ 4 CI'il' OFFCf ~UCAMONGA 17EM'---~~u'O 9/-20 PLANNING DIVISION TT['I'E: gv,~~o taasu~ N EXHIBIT: a~ SCALE: ~Z lal:l VS' lVffl~~lav vvva+•.+v.•+a• STAFF REPORT DATE: October 9, 1991 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SBHJ ECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSfiBSMENT AND CONDITIONAL ^SS PERMIT 91-20 SHELL OIL - A reque9t to flstabll ah a gee station, mini-market, and car wash on a 1.0E acre parcel in the Medium Residential de si9nation, (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest corner cf Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227- 151-17. Related File: Tentative Parcel Map 139 E7. Staff recomnend9 issuance of a Ne gative Declaration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Conceptual Site Plan, Conceptual Grading Plan, Conceptual Landscape Plan, building elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Buztounding Land Vse and Zoning: North - Single Pamily Residential under cOn9 tract io n: Victoria Planned Community (Low Medium Residential, 4-e dwelling unite per acre) South - Vacant: Terra Vista Planned Communl ty (Medium Real.dentlal, E-14 dwelling unite per acre) East - Single PamlLy Reaidentialf Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) West - Vacant: Terra Vista Planned Community (Medium Residential, Residential E-14 dwelling unite par acre) C. General Plan Desl9natlone: Project SSte - Low Medium Residential (d-E dwel ling units per acre) North - Low MedSUm Realdentlal (4-8 dwelling un Lts per acre) South - Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) West - Lov Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) D. Parking Cdlcu latione: Type of Uee Service Station Min 1-Market Total Number of Number of Square Parking Spacee Spaces Footage Ratio Required Provided 3 3 2,152 1/250 9 U 12 16 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-20 - SHELL OII. October 9, 1991 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to deve lop.a 24-hour service station facility consisting of 12 gasoline dispensing stations, a 2,152 square foot mini-aarket, and a drive-thru car wash. Under the definition contained in the Terra Vista Community Plan, service stations and their related uses (mini-market and car wash) aze considered "Community Facilities." As such, service stations may be located ir. any zoning designation, along any of Terra Vista's major arterials (Rochester, Poothill, Base Line, and Milliken), subject to review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The Terra Vista Community Plan does, however, require the use to be "separated from residential uses by a street, additional landscape setback, or other 'buffer' satisfactory to the Planning Co¢miseio n." B. Desi 4n Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Chitiea, Me lcher, Kroutil) reviewed the project on September 5, 1991, and did not recommend approval. The Committee requested that the plane be revised to address the following concerns: Architecture 1. The canopy column seems out of proportion. 2. The gable, pop-out roof elements appear unfinished and should be redesigned to provide a more integrated roof design. 3. The storefront elevation should be redesigned to elimina[e the glass at the bottom portion of the elevation to screen merchandise that may be stacked against the window. 4. A sturdier material (i.e. ceramic tl le) should be used at the base of the columns to minimize damage. 5. The building should be designed with a Buff icient roof overhang [o prevent water from running down the building aide and at alning the walla. Site Plan 1. The property line at the southeast corner of the ai to should relate to the driveway location. It dote not seem appropriate to cross over property not owned by the applicant to access the project. 2. Some concecn was expressed about the three-car stacking for each pump island. 1 -I PLANNING COMM IS SICN STAFF REPORT CUP 91-20 - SHELL OIL October 9, 1991 Page 3 3. TT.e location of the parking spaces adjacent to the residential area might create problems with noise, trash, etc. 6. Concern was expressed about the visibility of the aii/water stand from the cashier's window. Clear visibility should be maintained for security and safety of the patrons. In addition to the architecture and site planning comments, the Committee expressed seriosss reservations about locating a service station at this location because of the proximity of future residential projects. The Committee felt that there would be on- going conflicts between the two uses. Land Use: In October 1989, the Planning Commis aion apprvvsd an amendment to the Terra Vista Planned Community allowing service stations along the major arterials of Terra Vista (Milliken, Haee Line, Foothill, and Rochester) subject to review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Conditional Permit applications are typically required for those activities that, because of their unique site development and operating characteristics, require special consideration in order to operate in a manner compatible with surrounding uses and provide adequate mitigation of any potential adverse impacts. The Commission felt that there may have been appropriate locations along the arterials for service stations and that the Conditional Use Permit process wns the mrrect instrument for review of any ouch proposal. In reviewing the current application, the Desi qn Review Committee expressed concern about the compatibi llty of this service star ion in re Lotion to future residences immediately adjacent to the south and west. Because o£ the concerns voiced, the applicant and staff agreed to bring the application to the full Planning Commission to discuss the compatibility of the service station with the surrounding uses. In determining whether the request will be compatible with the surrounding us ea, the Planning Commission should consider the following: 1. Ia the design (orientation, placement, buffer/separation, architecture, Landscaping) of the service station appropriate to mitigate any potential roof lices between the two different usee7 2. I9 the orientation and placement of the building consistent with the policies of the City in relation to the public right-of-way and adjacent usee7 D. Neighborhood Meeting: On September 4, 1991, a neighborhood meeting was conducted to rece lve input from re sl dente on the proposed service stations however, no reai dents attended the meeting. 1S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CVP 91-20 - SXELL OTL October 9, 1991 Page d E. Enviroruaental Assessment: In completing the Environmental Assessment for the project, staff has identified several areas of potential adverse environmental impacts connected with the project. Ficst, as with any gas station, amiss ion of vapors from the dispensing of gasoline is a prime concern. The applicant has been working with the South Coast Air Quality Management Oistri ct and has obtained the necessary permits for the project. The sernnd issue connected with the project is the creation of new light and glare at the intersection. The Development Code requires that a lighting plan be submitted for review by the City identifying the foot candles present on-site and allowing not more than five foot candles to spill onto adjacent properties. Plans will be reviewed to ensure light fixtures are directed and shielded to limit any spill-over onto adjacent properties. Tf the project is approved by the Commission, this will become a condition of approval. The third and final environmental issue is noise that might be created by the project. The noise introduced to the residential neighborhood is different from the typical noise issues dealt with by the Commission. The noise can not be metered like the freeway noise because it will not 6e constant. The noise will be intermittent and include au<h things as the starting and stopping of care, the revving of engines, squealing of tires, loud radios, etc. The applicant is indicating that a block wall will be constructed around the perimeter of the station next to the future residences. This will help cut down the noise to the homes. The nearest existing residence is on the east side of Rochester Avenue but the master plan shows future residences as close as ten Eeet from the station property line. If the Commission approves the project, the Comfai scion may want to consider a greater separation between the station and future residences to provide an adequate buffer. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In Order for the Planning COmil scion to approve the Conditional ose Permit app licationr the following findings moat be made: That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the obje cti vee of the Development Code and Terra Vista Planned Community, and the purposes of the district in which the Bite is located. That the proposed use, together with the conditions app Li cable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Planned Community. YLANN 1TiG CONM IEE LON STAFF REPORT CUp 91-20 - SHELL OIL October 9, 7991 Page 5 CORRESYDNDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have Deen sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject site. RECOMMENDAT LON: Staff recommends that the Pla nnirtg Commission receive all written and oral testimony on the proposed project. If, in Lhe opinion of the Planning Commission, the project can be designed to provide sufficient buffering between the two uses, the Ylanning Cos~iss ion should refer thin item back to the Design Review Com:ittee or direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval to be Drought back at the next meeting. If the Ylanning Commission does not £eel that the compatibility can be achieved between the uses, staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution denying the Conditional Use Permit application for adoption at the next meeting. Respect lly sub ted, ~~ Brad ler City Planner BH:SM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Mep Exhibit "H" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape P1aR Exhibit ^D" - Building Elevntions _7 7 . -.._ _i .. .m .~ ~ :wnf i -~ ~ _ ..~ ~ VACANT - -- - UNDER CONSTRUCTION ~~ /; ~~ ZONEO MEDIUM ;VACANT Lois __ _ ~ DENSITY RESIDENTIAL _ s --r- -^ '- ~ - ~ i ..._,._-_-- ~ ~I LINE ROAD SITE BASE ~ ~" I ~.I.-I.~ ~V I A~O~ VACANT ~~~ ~~~ I L I \ I CURRENT STATUS. ~ - f(/TURE~ UNRIANNEO ~ t MEDIUM DENSITY ~~ ~~~ ~ RESIDENTIAL `, I ~ ~ ~~ ~~ , , ~~-1.~J I~~~~~~~ \~,~ ~~~ \ / V ``/~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~~ ~6rr'', ~~ _I ~_f.^, CITY OF F~AlYCE~Cl. ,~UCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION a W W U ~ `rte` _ ~"r --I'~ ~ ~~ ~, ~~~~ ~ ' ~k _. 1--, ~~ '~ ~~ ' I - 1 --/l .I ~ x«roao IpfF' REM: cum sr ~ ca TITLE: ~1'i11r ur~i~iridw EXHIBIT:A-~ SCALE: N it f ~~ i ~~~~~ . 1--i l1 ~n ~" s. ne,.i~.irv~. am.w.o~ne: I Y ~__ ~~._ S L ~p ~ o ~ ali II .~ V ~~\ / ~ I I ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ 1i ~/. 'Y ~/~ 11 ~i it 1 'I. e S ~-- - C ~ \ Q f ~'wanv aatsxxu z i~ t~ N ; ~,ij a U ti N ~$ v t ~~ U ~/ x __-- tl3153'MJOb ~ ----- _- ----__-----_ ~-~'- ~ a .,~. -- g ~.~ ~ b ~ ~ -. ~_ - _ . ~ -~ ~ / t --_ ~- ~ ~ .: ~ .a ~ - --- • ~_ ~* ~ ; ~ _ y ,, i ~, - 3 °'~ o ~ ~ _ r1 ~~ ' c• •. ' < ~~~~ i t .. ~ _ \ ~ ! . _ _- ,/ ,~_ ! .~/ _~ i i y ~ U ~~ e ^ ~e ~: / _ y~ i J _ ~r -4 4 ~k ~T, ~ ^k sn 1 m°_ i~~ U~ y~ " R rt s r ~c~ Y e R ^, J o~ ~a -~ "~~ __ ~ ~~ R -t / i K .^., -"- n r ^~' ~~ /~ ~ .. i e ~..~ tTEM: Guv ~ to CITY OF ~ UCAMONGA .~.~~; ~is~.aN PLANNIN('r D ION • ~ EJ(HIBIT:~L SCALE: ,., g~ a ~` ~~ n y~-\ ,i :r -~ -rt ~.' s- r ,~, ~ y . r_ ~vvJ 9 ~i ,~ ~ ~ r .,,r. __ .~~.k, ~ ~ i - -- ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 -- ~ 3 ~ ..i~ ~~ ~~ (/ ~ ~ ~ - ~` i~ I ~~j \~) § ~ °.i$ z E a~ y v ~~ ~ L U CITY OF CAMONGA PLA ION U ~~` NCVIN~- D TITLE: _ ~YiVATJQNJ EXHIBIT: A~ SCALE: `~ 3 s~ CRY OF~~H UCAMONGA PLANN7Nti D [ON -~ REM: Cleo 9j= st0 TITLE: fLE-Gl/NVS EXHIBIT:O-2SCALE: ' i ~. ~.. 4~ ~i I i'> 1' ~> ~ ' i ~ /; l CITY OFD UCAMONGA PLANIVIN~- © IOIV W k t l i ~~ ITEM:. CMi ~= JtO rrrLE: ErE is+fie.+~ EXHIBPf: O •J SCALE: gs e 3 a Y r --~~ .-~ ~', 'I ~~ Notion: Moved by Toletoy, seconded by Va llette, to adopt the reeolvticn a reproving Hodif ie ation tc Conditional Uee Permit 88-42. Hction carrieC by the f oilawing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, HCNIE L, ME LCHEA, TOLS TOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE AH SENT: COMHISSIONE AS: NONE -carried I. ENVIRONMENTAL A85ESS HE N' AND CON-ITION r USE PERMIT 91-20 - SHELL OIL - A request to est eb liah a gee stet is n, mini-market, antl ear wash on a I.OR3 acre paresl in the Medium Reeidentiel deeignet ion, (e-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned community, to cat ad at the soot hwest corner of ease Line Road and Aochest ar Avenue - APN: 227-151-17. Staff recomnende ieauance of a Negative Declaration. Re lntad tile: Ten!at ive Parcel Map 13987. .,• ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES SHENT AND T NTATI PAR M P 13907 LEWIS QEVELOPHENT COMPANY - The crest ion of a single 1. 0E3 acre parcel for the development of a gee station, mini-market, anC car waah in the Medium Au idsnt ial du ignat ion (8-16 dwelling unite per acres of the Terre Vista Planned community, located nt the southwest corner of Bau Line Road end Rochubr Avenue - APN: 227-151-17. Staff recommends Louancs of a Negative Oeclat ation. ReLatad Lila: Cored ltionel Uaa Permit 91.20. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the ataft report. Chairman McNiel ee ked if there was ecceu to the housing development through the Bout hero driveway. Mr. Murphy replied that the plans depict an emergency ecru a. ,ye eaitl the master plan shows two points of eecus coming oft tM future etree t, wh uh the Fire Dratrict feeU ie euff is ient, and therefore the ecceu from the eery ice station drivawry will be an extra arc a s. Comniea inner Tolstoy asked if there would be arc us from Rochester. Bartye Hanson, Senior Civil Engine r, stated staff had sugguted an ecceae from Rochester but the applicant had oat proposed one. Nr. Hu rphy stated the master plan is purely conceptual and any proposals would have to pzocsued through [he Planning ComnLSion. Mr. Hanson staUd that st off would be concerned about mixing ree identiai traffic wrth the sarv ice station traffic. Cha icmen McNis1 opened the public nearing Pianni r.g Commiaeion Hinut ee -9- October 9, iii. !J ~i ~,Y///fi'/T "/~ „ Ceoroe Theodorcu, Fo rma~ 10790 civic Center Rrive, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he represented She it Oil. He st aced the design of the ee r+ice star ion is atvoical of a retail service station and moos the raeu It of many months cf working with [he Planning and Engineering staff. Ha said they had provided the reverse atation deeign in co nfcrmance with the Crty'e policy. He et at ed she arch itectss re moos mss nt to coordin eta with Terra viapa ae a whole and aieo wzth Cent rnl Park Plaza. Ha indicated the qullw ing deeign for ingreee/egress was selected to mitigate traffic impacts with right-turn lanes provided into both driveways to provide safe ingreee/egre ea. He stated they were working w iih the adjacent property owner and it did rot appear it would be ne ceaeary tc provide access to the residential area. He said the gullw ing deeign had provided enhanced landscaping ace a. Ne ea id the pump ie lar.de are approx imetely 100 feet from the property lines and high der.e ity shrubs would ba placed along the perimeter of the property. He stated the topography and lantlecap ing would screen the view from the et: set. He reported there moos an approximate 3-foot Breda sapaz at ion between the property and the adjacent Euture reeider.t ial area. He proposed tls nee, tall trees atljnce rt to the future reside nc ea. He felt the et at eon will ae rev a reed in the convnu r.ity fcr increased compstit ion. Commissioner Nelcher qussticnad if the epplieant had considered a traditional atation with the pumps facing the arrest for th i• sit e. Hr. Thsotlorou responded negatively. He said they felt the reversed atation deeign would ba appropriate in light of other stations in the community. Comm teaionsr Nelcher stated that ncroe• the intersection [here is an existing walled ree ident ial project which provided eeparetion from the •ita. He felt the future roe itlential proj ect• would also be walled. He thought i[ may be appropriate to turn tM station around to face the street and ecraen it from Che adjoining future ru idantial use to the south. Mr. Theodorcu stated they had been diiectsd to reveres the et at ion. He felt that with rasidanti al ptoj mots on the adjacent thra cornan, the pcopceed deeign mny G visually more harmonious with the other corners. Chairman McNiel ettUtl the Commie ion he• given direction that eery ice stations shoo ld not face streata. Commi a toner Valletta etatad that one of the caneern• raised et the Dee ign Review CommLttu muting wu tM mouth pmpsrty lino. Sha commented trot the driveway croon property which is not owned by the applLcsn[. Hr. Theodorou etatad there had bun sxUnslw nsgot tattoos bNwun Shell and Uwi• Homo and Shall will be o6ligaCSd to maintain the •uement in perpet~a it y. Rick Mege r, Lewis Homu, 115fi Noath Mou orals Avenu •, Upland, etatad they hatl been working with Shell oil over the last year •nd had worked cLoss Ly order the direction o2 eta Cf. Ha felt t'na 0ue Line and Rochuuz inter action wilt be a high-CrafYrc interaction. He thought there ie a shortage of sere:ce Planning Commleeian N.inutae 4b- October 9, . I stations in the City, particularly in thin area cE the community, and the need will grow over time. He et ated they did not plan tc canetruct the neighbor ir.q residential area until at least :993 and fhe residential parcel rould be conditioned to prov itla additional barr iere, architectural, and land acaF irq d etaila to further buffer the site. He stated [hat Lewis ie by nature a resi3ential developer and they would not sacrifice the tharact ar of the residential arse for a 1-acre service wt at ion. He felt the land use ie compatible and that all of the cancerne could be mitigated. Chairman HcNiQ commented that once the eerv ice stet ion ie approved, the developer may pursue a change of zoning on the edjncent property to make it more compatible. Hs stated that he would not support such a land use cF.ange and buffering would be crucial from born parcels. Hr. Mager felt therw was adequate buffeting proposed from the shell property, but they expected butferina would aLo be ad dr ee wd when they proceaesd the residential property. Hs etatetl Lewis Homes had nv desire to change the surrounding land use from resident ial. He said [hat tN Twrre Vita Community PLan amendment ih 1988 defined Rochse<er Avenues and Bu• Lines Road as key arterials and the plan required aervic• et at ion uee• to be adequately buffered. Chairman HcNisl qua et is nsd the proposed ems_-gwncy drivwwap access and the southern driveway. Hr. Mager responded that 5he11 011 had originally propoud • 3/4-acres eerv ice station •iN. He uid they determ insd it would not be pose ibis Co design a project the Planning Commission would support on such a ems 11 parcel and therefore, the proposed parcel i• now slight ly larger than 1 •cre. He eantl they did not want a •heted dr'_vaway with the resident Lal ars• and they had propo sad an emergency acceq et the ague st of tM Fit• Oistr ice. Hs said shell has intlicated they cannot •tford to •lso purchase the lard containing the proposed southern driveway end had proposed an easement which they would bs abl rgaGd to maintain in perpetu ii y. Chairman NcNie1 asked how much land would be added Co tM She11 parcel if they purchaud tM land contain Lnq the proposed Qr Sveway. Hr. Theodorou replied approximately 1/a acre. Commissioner Hslcher ubd if it would be appropriate to atldren by minute action tM future relationship between the wrviee seat ion property and the adjoining ru ldeneo. Ne feli St •houltl b• noted that the Commis lion woultl be looking for adequate buffer inq and the Terra Vista specific plan requ ices separation by a street, additional Lndreape wtback, or other buffer. He fall the Commiq Lon shoo ld require • wparat ion equal to the width of the wider of the two •tresG an which the service slat ion fronts plus [he normal residential setback between tM wrvics station property line and the nearest ce•idential unit. Hs felt that Lewis Hame• should be requ lred to camplecely solve the eccu• problems, including emergency access !cr the ree:dent:al area, itru pective of eM eerv ic• station •i[y eo tMre would not be gates or Flann ing Comm>aeion Hinutse +MDf octaber 9, :95 ~~ any ether menne of ingress or egress on the southerly driveway. He asked if the appiica rtt felt such Condit io na were acceptable. Commieeionc Valletta asked if the Fire Department had seen the site plan with the driveway. Nr. Murphy said the Fire Department had indi catetl the 'emergency ac ce ee from t'.^.e eery ice et at ion weultl nut be needed. He avid there were two other access noir.te for the ree ident ial erect on the master plan. Hr. Hager •tatad they did not object to deletion of the emergency access from the service station to the ree idential area. Ha euggeeted coot ire ing the ;natter to permit Lewis Homac to look at Cho number of unite that may to iosi if the Commie ion ware to req.: ire the eetbac ke eugge eted by Cammieoic ner Melchez. Joe Oleaon, Lewis Homes, 115b North Mountain Avenue, Vpland, stated the se!back 6u gge at ed by Commies ion er Melchez would probably equal 120-150 feet. He aaid he woultl like Lewia'e design people to look at the project. comet ieeioner To let oy comment ed that it would not be acceptable to move a1'. cf the open apace for the residential project to this location. Nr. Oleeon agreed, and stated the ree ident ial pnrcel could be subject to multi-family stand arde. H. request ed that th• Planning Convnieaion recommend an exc option to eh. Terra Vista Planned Community 5t rest Impzavement ~ Implement nt ion Policy [o exempt the requirement for eon et ruction of the west half of Roc M•ter Avenue from Baee Line Road to Church Street. Mrcheel Robert e, '7349 Fennel Road, Rancho Cucamonga, stated there are currently reaidencee In place on the eouthaeet corner of Rochester and Base Line. He commented that unfortunately moat of the reaidente were not told c: the mooting. He appreciated the Conan is eion'o concern for future ree ident_a: development. He felt Baae Lin. and Milliken would ba a mare logical Bite for a service stet ion. He .aid theta are three school hue stops on Roche at er. He stated that the neighboring reeidenta would be subject to fumes from any gasoline apil L. Ns indicated there i• a pzopowd future high school in the area and he did not think the site i• nppropriab Eor a aarvic• stet io n. P.e r equeated that all vsidenb in the neighborhood be given announcements of any future meetings. Chairmen McNiel atabd that the legal not ificat ions had been sent to the prcperty owners within a 500-foot radius. Nr. Roberto atnbd his house eheuLd have received • notice, but he had cot. Heerinq no further acrimony, Chairman McNiel closed ale public heezing. Mr. Nu rphy et eted the Planning Commies ionaca had three apt ions: (1) If they felt comfoctab la with CM land uu, they could continue tM item to .-ev gee the pLa r.e, return to Design Review, and the full Comm ieeion; ;2) IE they agreed 2iannang Comm ie eon Nlnutee bNY- October ?, 1 with the land use and felt the ccndit ions could address the Dea ign Aev iew Committee's concerns, they could direct staff to return wit'r. a reeoivtion of app=oval for adoption at the nett meeting; or (3) if they did rot feel comfortable with the use, they coultl direst staff to return with a reeolut ion of denial for ad cpticn at the next meeting. Cemm iee ionet Chitiea stated she had ,Daen on the Ceeign~Rev iew Committee and had expre seed some tooter rs. She felt it would be appropriate for the more int enae veer to provide the major mitigation measures. She questioned if such an intenva use should be adjacent to rwaidancae. She felt it would bs Jiff ieult to mit igata intermittent noise from radios and vehicles. 5ha did not feel it would be appropriate to turn the stet inn around to face the intereacticr. in order to provide eddit ional buffering to the atljaeent neighborhood. Sh• agreed that evrvicw etation• are necessary, but ditl not feel this particular location is appropriate. Comaieaioner Melchor stated he was greatly concerned about the question of land use. Ha said service atntions, along with related usa• of mini-market and car wash, are Condit ionel ly pemitted netording to the 1989 amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan. Hs quutioned the appropriatsnee• of a mini- ma:kat because of the proximity of shopping facilities lees than 3/4 mile away. Ha also questioned the need for a car weeh, but stated he understood the need for competit ivenave. Ha indicated he had visited the Shell etation in Moreno Vnllay that had been reteraneed at the Design Aeview Commit tae Meeting and he thought the etation was wall done but msy experience traffic problems. He did not feel the project was ready for final action, but thought it should return to the Daeign Awvisw Comaittee before retu rninq to the full Commission. Ha ngreed the City needs additional service stet ions end felt the Location was good. Commievioner Vellett• thought that if thw station were npprovad, it should terry the major burden of providing a 6ufter to the future zeeidentinl area. She did not foal the site i• appropriate bateau of visibility from a residential area, light, •nd not u. Commie loner ToLtoy tali the location was appropriab becauw it i• a malor i ntersaction and M agtnd that the City nud• morn ^tat lane. Ne thought both parcels should ba involved with the buttering. Ha commented that the applicant had reported there w.• not enough monty in Shell's budget to provide enough lend to support the et etion. Ha thought it was necessary to provide a large enough property to corttin ell of the driveways, acne, and adequate buffering. Na felt the du ign still nudwd a lot of work. Chairman McN lei eked tM width of Rochester. Mr. Henson replied Lt U 7Z feat from curb to curb in • 100-foot right of way. Chairman McN •el rt ated he we• not convinced the location i• lnappcopriate for a sere its at et ion; however, ha fa It it i• a unlit iee area. He was pu zx led [hat Shell Oil wa^ not willing to purthae• en addltio nel 1/4 acre r.c accommodate the driveway be tau ea he felt the currer,e pLn may lead tc problems Plenc ing Comm lesion Minutes {,ld,. October 9, :>°: ~~ ir. the future. He thought adegv ate buffer irg may be possible, but warted zt ehawn on the plans. He «aa not sure the applicant knew what buffering would ba needed to mi[igate aE Ee cte on future residences. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated there appeared to be two commieaionere who felt the use was not appropriate for thin location, two.who felt the use was appropriate, and one who felt the use may be appropriate Dui tilers were major design ieeuev. He said it would be a judgment call on the part of the applicant ae to whether they should proceed. Chairman McNiel asked if any of the Ccmmiaeionere agreed with the proposed easement for the tlriveway. It was the unanimous cane ensue of the Comm lesion thnt the concept was not acceptable. chairmen NcN ie1 a^_atad that the city needs service et at zone, but he felt the tleeign problems for the Bite moat be atltlzeee¢d. Ccnmissioner Valletta £elc th¢ plan called for too much on aveh a small site and she felt it was too close to a resident iel area. She felt the applicant should Beak a larger site. Commissioner Tolatoy agr¢sd a larger airs would be better. Commi uion•r Chitin felt the site woe ld havv to incruu significantly. commissioner Ve11¢Lty aakvd if the other Commleaioners agreed the proposed parcel iv not large enough. chairman McNlel felt there was aveh a consensus. Commies ionar To Ltoy was concerned about a mini-market and thought a tvll- servica etetion may be more eppropriaty for the location. Hr. Murphy stabd a full service ¢t at ion would introduu other noise factors, such as jac ka, squ ipmvnt, etc. Commie ionar Mslchvr felt it should b¢ noted that a Bite at 0asa Line and Hilliksn had bwn previously considered for • urvicv station, end it was determined that was not a sultab is situ. H¢ augqutsd a finding that th¢ nee ie appropriate subject to adequate size, having ell ingrn s/egress on Bite, mekin9 a ^ubstant iel contribution to the buffering, end dsLtion of the mznz- market. Cammiss loner To Utoy agrud. commlu iorsc He1cMr suggutad the item may havv to b¢ rvedvert Led. Mc. 8u 11.er et et ad toot a ns iy-hborhood meeting had bqn held but ne one showed up. He [hough[ it may bs eppropr lets to send ou[ additional nottcee. He said staff would be aura that the residents in the Rochester tract are not if zed. 7lenning Ccnmzaeion Hinut as ~LS4-•~ October 9, :99' -II Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Hot ion: Novad by Helcher, seconded by Tcletay, to find that the use is appropriate vuDjert to adequate size, having a1L ir.greee/agrees on Bite, making n eubet an tiai coot ribvtion tc the buffering, and tle letion of the mini- market and tc continue Environmental Aeeeeeme nt and Cc nd it Tonal Vee Permit 91- 20 and Environmental Aassevmen! and Tentat'_ve Parcel Map 13907 to December 11, :991. Motion carried by [he following vote: AYES: CORM ISSIONERS: NCNSEL, HELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHIIIEA, VAIwETTE ABSENT: COlfH ISSZONERS: NONE -carried The Planning Ccmmi¢e ion rec eeaetl from 9:15 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. K. A N A D W 0- RANCON REALTY FUND 1j - Ths development of a 31 acre office park master plan within the Znduetrial Park District (Suharea 7) of the Induvtriei Atea Specific Plan, located on the north eitle of Civic Cent ez Drive Det wean White Oak Avenue and Red oak Street - APN: 200-352-23, 24, 2E, 69, and 50. Staff recommentls iuuanu of a Negative Daclartt ion. ... ENN IRONiSENTAL AESESSHENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP 13611 - AANCON REALTY FUND III - A subdlvieion of 31 ecru of land Lnto 10 parcel• in the Indu atrial Park District (Subaru 7) of the Indu atrial Area Specific Pian, laceted on the north ^ide of Civic Curter 6rive Detwean White oak Avenue and Rod Oak Street - APN: 208-352-23, 24, 2E, 49, end 50. Ste Et recomnende i.eeusnce of a Negative Dw laration. Tom Crahn, Au ivtart Planner, ptuanbd the staff report end •howetl documents depicting the conceptual psdeetrian plaza s• pzev Lonely approved by [he Planning Commieeion. Chairman McNie1 asketl iC the delsticn of the nwnuswnt •iqn• had altered the entries in tetme of landscaping. Hr. Grahn stated the tleaign chengetl somewhat. He said the grading plan and parcel map do not indicate a •igr.if icon[ grade change 6etwun the eor. per and [he street. Ha stand the applicant had bun asked to prepare the addit icon: vxhibic• shown nn page 36 of the design qu idelinu showing increased landscaped utback• sad buffers to be inc lutlsd at the inteructionv. Comm ieeioner Vellety asked if a building would be cor.etructed right hehAnd the plaza. She indicated one was shown on the mavtK plan for the plaza but was not shown an the vita plan. Planning Cemm iaeion Mrr.utes yLb- October 9, :99: ~Z ~~N/ ! r I ~Lfryl'~ Cha Lrman HcN1i1 opened the public hearing•~here ware m comments and he AYES: f.OHH'_SSIONE}j.P~ HISIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOR, VALLETTE closed the hear irq. Mo^_io n: Hoved by Toletcy, escort ad/by Chitiet, to issue s Negative Declaration and atlopt the reao tion approv inq Env it orune nt al Aeeeeement, Tentative Parcel Map 13859, an he Vacation of Railroad Avenue South. Hot ion carriatl by the following vot . NOES: COHMISSYONEAS: NONE ABSENT: Cf)HMISSIONEAS: NONE -cnrriad . « . . ~~ ,. '} A . request to estab lisM1 a gas sta[idn, ih ni-oTi eE} id ~ur wash on a 1.31 acre parul in the Medium Residential du ignatlon, (8-16 dwelling unite par acre) of tM Terra Vista Planned Conmunity, lo<atsd at the southwest corner of Baca Line Rond and Rochastei Avenue - ApN: 127-151-17. Staff r ecommende iesuano oL a Negative Dec larat lan. Related Lila: Tantat ive Parcel Mnp 13987. (Continued from Oct oDsr 9, 1991) Scots Murphy, Auoc Lte Planner, praeanbd tM et aft report. Ha st siad that the plans provided at the meeting reflected the requatad adjustment in the property line to include the driveway otf Aochabr. Ne aid the new plane provided a minicoum 30-[ooL landscaped arra within the urvic• station ei<e. He reported that the Duign Rav saw Covmltta had auggated a non-buildable easement ba recorded for the property located to the south and watt to provide a minimum building setback of 50 feat. Ne aid the Design Rav law Comm itcee also requastad that nolu attenuaUOn methods G explored for inst allot ion with the eery ice station. Chairman HcNiel quest LOned if there had been discuaion• regarding poeeibly moving the vacuum stalls away from the ru ldent isl area. Mr. Hurphy replied that the Comm it tea had disouued moving tho air and water at and. He •uggaGd Chat the Commiee Lon may du its to xlao nave the vacaum locat ton. Chairman HcNiel opened the public haring. George Theodorour Porma, 10790 CLv is Center Drive, f100, Rancho Cucamonga, stated hs reposmtW She 11 oil. He reported chan9a had been made to the •tb plea based upon review st two Design Review Coesalttee Meetings aubaeq~e nt to the last PLnnLnq Commie ion review of the project. He ^ald They had incorporated an aseswnt Snto Shs 11'e property sad had reviad the erte Flan boundary on the southwest portion to include a minimum o! 10 feet of LendecepLnq 6etueen tM curb and property line on 9he11'• property. He eaid they aLo Lncraaed the MCght of the overall scraninq from • 6-Lott wa1: t_ 'itieri~sq eawieeLdsl RSMH ~ '118' DedMbeK 17, 199: ~l3 a 6-foot wait over • 4-foot berm to effectively yield a 10-Loot height. Ha said Lewis has been cooperative in agreeing to provide whatever ie needed on the residential property to the south and vent to provide the combined ]5-fact landscaped buffering. He believed that would be vufflciant to provide the e ^_reening. Hs et eted they had discueeed the potent lal elimination of the mini-market with Shell, but She11 requizea the mint-market. He ea id it was hie understanding that the mini-market would be allowed to remain. Ccmmieeioner To le toy asked if the vacuum stalls would be moved. Hr. Theotlorou et ated their movement had never bean diecu ued. George Dynes, '13]8 Psnnel Road, Rancho Cucamonga, ataGd he Dad not talked at the last Planning Commie ion Meeting. He avid there ere to itle nts to the east of the proposed service atat ion in the Rochester tract. He et atad the wind blows from the west to [M east and anything that spills at the station will probably go to tM asst. He said he had lived clog to a uzvlca station in the past and when you drive into a service station you can smell the qae. He reported that the air Quality Nanagemen! District (AQMD) had notified hie neighborhood of the project and hatl indicated the chance of getting cancer because of the service stet ton would ba 1 chance in a million. He objected to the increaeed chances of cancer. He indicebd that a lot of the neighbors ate upset by the prospect of a earv ice et at ion. He Lelt • mini-market is uneccepteb le Decause !t would increase cr Lae. He uid he inveatigatu crimes in Claremont and they most often occur at mini-marts. He objected to a 26- hcur operation of a mini-market. No did net [eel • wrvioe station he longv in a residential area. He thought that there would be Lncruud traffic on Rochester and conmanted there ie a school bus stop at Roc he afar and L ro nwootl. He felt t ecru ice stet ion shoe ld 6e located at Pooihlll becau ee the wind would then blow into nn area zoned for Commercial. Cha trman McNisl stet ed that an September 4, 1991, there was a ne ig hborhooa meeting and na one came. Nr. Dynes et ated he had not heard aDOUt the neighborhood meeting. He said he did not know anything about the service station until he received the AQND notification. Ne said a sign went up afUr that flat. Chairman McNiel asked Dow far hie house is located Czom the proposed site. Hr. Dynes psponded that It ie two blocks to the est. He thought a serv ue stnt ion should be placed on Milliken in a Commercial zoM, not a res idenn cal area. Larry Aoes, Shell Oilr 19 Quiet Hill e, Pomona, sated he is the LndLvidual wno will be respons lb le Cor running [hs service station. He Bald he would lake ro dlecuea the concerns of gasoline vapors. Ne uid Sn the last two to thraq y ears there have bun ma]or changes in the conetructlon of urviu etat:one, including precautions such as double walls for tanks and lino, vapor recovery nozz LS, vapor recovery arses, antl spill containment units around the drop fills. He said that wcurity ie a big concern and 9M 11 OL1 installa total Planning Commie SOn Ninut es t~9A^ ^acem6gr li's L video eurveild sore unite which aza tied in with their meneger'e unite and a unit at hie rioms. He said the et at ion will be run as a salaried et at ion, not a leased et at ion. He said the station will be a $Z million operat io^, including service et etlon, free car wash, and mint-market. Comm Tea TOner Helcher asked how many lot at io ne Mr. Ross currently runs. Hz. Rosa replied that he nee 10 etatione under hie directicn, including one that ie just coming on-line ir. Palm Springs. Commissioner Helchor Baked haw many cr imae hod taken place at Lhose locations during the past year. Mr, Rcu replied that during the pact three yore there have been two hold-ups at the nine etatione which have been operat inq. Ho said they provide brightly lit locaticne and their security camerae era easily seen by LM public. ccmmiee TOner Hslchsr asked if theca had been any other crimes of any sect. Mr. Ross responded that graffiti ie the only other cY1me and they constantly paint out any graffiti which appears. Cammi uioner Tol atoy asked if they experience lcit erSnq free eM no ighborhocd people. Mr. Rose said they hove very little lolterLnq. He reported that Shell oil does not allow pay GUphonea, which cuts down on loitering. He said they also do not have video gamao. Chairman HcNiel asked if the et at ion will always Do a ulezisd ataticn. Nr. Rosa et atad that they open etatione so Marled siai ions and then search for dealers to run the etakions. Ho said Sn hL thrn years they had turned over ono station to a dealer. Chairman HcNiel asked !f UwL Homes wes in agreement with the buffering. Rick Mager, Lwis Hoare, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upland, stated they concurred with the r-quutad buffering. Commlesioner Tol atoy asked if Lney wore propoolnq a non-bu lldablo easement. Hz. Murphy stated iM ro would be no habitable structures within 50 Eeet. He said it could W detached gan.ps. Hr. Heger agreed with the under tending. Chairman HcNiel asked L[ a lighting layout had been received. He was tooter nwd abcut the lighting effect to the streets and surrounding area. Rlanninq Commi o ion Mlnutos td0-• Oecembec l :331 I ~J Hr. Murphy at atatl lighcrnq ie typically hard led through the plan check proce ee. Ha said tM photometric diagram 1e rev Sewed by staff and the eherif f'e department to be ears chars is edaqu eta lighting an-site and there ie not a spillage of light onto atljoin ing propertise. commies ioner Tolstoy asked what the South Coast Al,r Quality Hanegement Oietri ct (SCAQMD) permit entai la. He asked whet typ. of restrictions were placed cn the et at io n. Hr. Rose stated the SCAQHD cone idere the plena and pncnutione antl i0 ease the permit to diepnn9e gasoline with no restrictions. Ha acid that neigh bore are advised ae part of tM SCAQND proc ass. H• said he had hoard that some residents thought a refinery was going to b• built there lneteatl of a earv ice station. Hr. Hu rphy et at ed that he had zeceiwd several t•lepho n• calla tram people wondering why tR• City was going to allow a ref finery to b• built. Mr. Rose stated they meet az excsetl every guideline oC 5CAQMD. Hr. Dynes stated that they had received only one letter from AQNn which indtcnted that a certain amount cE gas particles would be emitNd. Fearing no further bet imony, Chairman HcN1.1 closed the puDllc hearing. Commissioner Vallait• comment •d that -at the October 9, 1991, Planning Commie sion Meeting, the Commie ibn had voted by • J-Z vob that the use fie appropriate if certain factors were considered ins lading the project's making an adequate contribution to the bu [feting. 9M stated that the plans intlicated approximately 10 feet of 6u tfering and she did not feel that wan a aubstant Sal contribution to the but taring. 9M said the motion also called for the deletion of the mini-market and the present ptopoul et 111 called far the mini-market. Commieeicnet Helcher asked how many other service etatione in the City have mini-markets end what experience the Sher it ['s department Dae had in relation to crime. Nr. Murphy responded that almost all of the service stations Ln town have some Corm of mini-surkN In varying ri rase He did not knov about the Sheriff's experi•nu. Commies loner Va11atG ukW how many of the other urvlc• at atione are surrounded by ruid•ntlal on all sides. Mr. Murphy did not kncw of any that are au mounded by residential. Commlasio n•r ch Ltiu •bt•d she appreciated working with the people from She11 end their securing cooperation from Lewis on the drlvew•y aspect. However, she •t 111 felt that the sution is too intensive of a use to W placed in an exclusively re •ldsnt isl neighborhood. SM was concerned aDOUt vapors, l.g nt, Planr.i ng Commieslan Hlnutas ~Lb^ Oscember i~, :i 31 I~ noise, antl eeturity problems. She did not feel the location is appropriate. Sha said that even thcugh the applicant had gone to great langthe with the design, the trill had Bite-speeif is obj act ions. She agreetl with ^_he concerns of Hr. ^ynee. Chairmar. N<Niel {ell the facility was fine far a gee e¢at io n. He acid there had been some diecu se iona abouC whether each a use would be appropriate at Chia location. H0 indicated tha< Rochester and Be ee Line ie a fairly major intereecti on and he did rot feel th• use is inappropriate. He ditl not feel the potential prob lame associated with a service etaticn are eo critical that they cannot be mitigated. He felt the applicant had contributed auhatane :ally to the 6u EEaring for the back aide and noted that the City had zecaivotl au era recta from thn adjacent residential property developer of a willingneu to work with the City with respect to the balance of the mitigation meaaurae. Ho taw no reason that a mini-market should be allowed to go elaowhere and not bo permitted in this location. He thought Cho cammun ity le in dire need of ee rvice etas iona. Coimnieeioner Melchor et aced he support od the appl icetion. conenieeio rar Toletoy stated that at the October 9, 1991, Mooting commieaionor McLC her had suggested deletion o[ the mini-market. He questioned l[ Commies Toner Malcher had changed hie mind caneerning the deletion of the minl- matket. Commisslonec Nolchor crated that at the October 9, 1991, meeting he had pointed out to eM Commie lore that in the Terra Vista plan Mango that enable t his uw the CommieaLon had the pourer to regulate whether or not there we• a mini-market in this iceation. He said hie remark at the Ortobor 9 meeting was in an effort to get aome sort at dealt ion made. He said ha dtd not pareanal ly have a prob lam with rho mini-market. Commies ionar Toletoy agreed that the City certainly needs more eery ice stet ions and he felt that neighborhood esrvics stations are appropriate. He trot ed that tote Line and Rochester will be a major intersect lore in the future and hs felt there L a who is eras of rho CLty which la not currently aervod by gas etattone. Hs e4tod he •illl had grist rosorvtt ions about the mini- market. Ns sold that •ltho49h Shell his LndlCated minl-markets era economically neuoary, he thought the Ciiy currently has two •tatlone wlt hoot mini-marts which seem to Da doing sat Ltaetorily. Ne supported n qae etas ion and car wash sa long a• the vacuum station wars moved, but he was not cony laud a mint-market should ha permitted. Commies ionar Va11otG questioned if the proposed buttering was to be JS feet or 50 feet. Mr. Mucphy •tats0 there wu a proposed 50-Coot building utback from the property Lino for ro Sdsnt ial uu •nd a combined 35-toot land scope tuffar ing area. Ha said the service station wa^ proposing 10 fat of Lndsca pl.ny, eo a 25-Loot land •caped .area would 6e pL<od on th• ru ident Tel property. Planning Comm iseion Minute -q~l,gr December .~, :991 f Commissioner +lal lei t. stated that the original motion of October 9, 1991, called for deleC loo of the mini-market. Sha asked how the praj ect had proceeded Sn the proses to include a mini-market. Nz. Hurphy orated that the direction from the October 9, 1991, meeting was to return the project to Design Aoview. He said the OH ign Aaview Committee reviewed the project antl the Eaeling of at lee si one member of the Committee was that the mini-market was not a concern and thors was no clear conesneus from the Come, ittea. He said it wa• therefore reiuzned to the full Commiaeion for their cone Lderat ion. commissioner Vellatt• asked the Luture ccnEigurationo for ^ay Ctuk Avulevard avtl Aocheet er Avenue. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Enginur, responded thst Day Creek Boulevard will be a six-lea. divided highway and Aochaster 1a termed a major arterial, Which will be s four-lane undivided highway. Commie sionsc Va11atL ached if thane are Commerdal situ on the corner of Day Creek ecu laverd and Bue Llne Road. Nr. Nurphy stated that the cloeeat commecc Sal area is at Highland. Chairman HcNLl asked Commies Loner ToLtoy'e concerns requdinq mini-markets. Commie loner Tolatoy ruponded to iterinq, the potential for Crime, and people leaving their cu adios turned up whit running Sn to buy something. He eaid the potential problems could be controlled by good management, but ha did not feel thou problems should be near ru ltlential aru s. Moved by ChiCieb uconded by Vaileite, to dllect stafl to prepare a reso uilvn of denial for 6nvlronmental Auusment and Conditional ^ee Permit 91-20. Notion taLLd to carry 6y [he falloWlnq vote AYES: COt97I SSIONERe~ CHITIEA, VALLBTTt NOES: CONMISSIONSMt MCNI6L, HELCNEA, TOLSTOY ABSENTa CONH199I0lRAli NONB -C•11sd Comtaiu loner Tol stoy stated he voNd no be csuu he Celt that • wrv Lce stet ion Le needed in thaC locaCion even though he did not fNl • mint-market should be permitted. Bred Buller, City Planner, eked if conditions could W added to address the concerns oL Co®SU loner Tolatoy. N. sugquted the Ccemiesion may wish to direct etaLf to preWrs • resolution of approval with conditions including perhaps limiting the hour^ o[ operation [or the mini-market or the eat :ce facll Sty. He eteted that su f[ had not yet prepued a resolution of approve: sad perMFS staCL could dlstuu th+ conditions with the apyllcant to see if concerns could W adequately add need. Planning comet Leicn Mlnutu +d2~ December i-, .9?: (i' Chairman NcN 1el objected to lim it inq the haute :>f operation because he felt it would be n restriction of life etyl e. xucaray Noved by Nelche r, eacor,ded by Tolst oy, to direct et aff to prepare a reaolut ion of approval with appropriate anodic ion• for the January e, 1993, Plano inq Comm L aion Nseting. Net loo carried by the fo l3ow inq vote: AYES: COMMZSSIONEA3: NCN ffiL, HELCHER, 20LSTOY NOES: CONHISSZONE R3: CHITIEA, VALLETTE ABSENT: COMttISSIONERS: NONE -cart ietl Chaiman HcN iel reopened the public hearing to allow the Commiseion to diecuee the contli[ic n• on dams azy e, 1992. ,ryeiaati.,. s e e e e l U. ENVIRONMENTAL A53665N_NT ANO ^E NTATIVE PA_CEL M. 13987 LEWIS DsP .VJ(yCPMENT OONPANY `.- Tne creation of a •ingl• 1.31 acre parcel for the Development of a gai et at ion, mini-marks[, and car wash Ln the Medium Ro sident iel des ignetidn (8-16 duQlLnq unit per wca) of rho Terra Vista Planned Community, to c~tsd at tM southwest cornea of Bow Line Roed ¢nd Rocheetsr Avenue - AP~: 227-151-17. Stott rocamaiortda Lsu once of a Negative Declarsi ion. Related fLle: Conditional Des Permit 91-20. (Continued from octobor A, 1991) Scott Murphy, Awac laG P1annLr, stated that aiaff recommsndod that the item b• continued to Snnuaty B, 1992, to permit tM Comma o ion to handle i! concurrently wLth Condit ional UYe Permit 91-20. Chairman HcNial opened the pub 110 hearing. Rick Nagar, Lewi• Homes, 1156 No th Nouniain Avenue, Upland, diecueaad the condition requiring the oxtene!on ~ all otf-site improvamont• along Roehe stet from the interwar ion of Raw Lin Aoad down to Cburch. H• thought that placed an excuaiw burden on tM pr ]oat and ukad that rho alto bo viewed an connection with future ru identlal d valopsont in Planning Ares 7. H• felt the impact of • onracse dwelopme t et the corner will have negligib is dralnego •ffecto and the o[f-alb dral ago impravaawnta of RocMOter could to daferwd except that Cho Terra Vista P1 nnod Community 9t root Improvement and Drainege Improvement :mplementat Lon Poll lw adopted Ln September 1989 require that any development at rho corner would 'trigger CM exUnoion o[ the off-site improvasunb down to Church. Ha asked thl~t the applicant bo permitted to deal with •nginwrlnq rtat[ to •oLw eny poGn •1 problems chef thorn could b¢ ae tMy zelat• to the ono-earn parcel davalope~nt and doter rho compleb aff-site Lmprovemonto. Chairman N<N lei requuUd that Engineorinq dpnslder Mr. Moger'• comments and consider nee only potential drainage prohlwo', but •Lo wtoty with rsepsct to haw tN road would widen ar narrcw coming off kho wrvlw ota[LOn property. Planning Comm lea ion Minutes Fya.h Doc ember .:+. ~I ... ENVIRONMENTAL ASS ESSHENT AND GENERAL P'AN AMENDMENT 90-038 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA - A raga eat to tec ommentl approval of a vaneral Plan Amendment to provide coneiatency wi[h the draft Et iwanaa North Specific Plan, prezoning approximately 6,840 ac re• of territory in the Rancho Cucamo nqa epner• of influence to provide for 3,fi13 Bing le family dwelling unite on 2,473 ac ra• of vacant land, 28 acres of neighborhood coamerclal ues, 4 echoo le, 5 parka, an equestrian cunt er, antl preservation of 6,112 acres of open apace general ly located north of Highland Avanua (State Route 30~, south of the son Bernardino National Forest, vast of the City of Fontana, and east of Milliken Avenue. (Continued from December 17, 1993.) Rrad Buller, city Plen nor, remarked that eta tf recommended that the matter be continued to January 22, 1991, to allow time for nsgetiniion• to be complvt vd in the lawsuit. Chairman HcNiel oq nsd the public hearing. David DlIOrio, Caryn, stated he would be abU tc return on January 22, 1992. Notion: Ho vad by Tolstoy, seconded by Vallet te, to continue Env Sronmvnt al Impact Report for Sgcific Plan 90-01, Environmental Aueesment and SgclEic Flan 90-01, and Envlranment al As pesment and General Plan Amendment 90-03B to January 22, 1992. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCA{EL, !lELCNER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COHMISSIONEAS: NONE A85ENT: CONMISSIONER9+ NONE -carried F. F,ErvjAONMENTAL ASSSSSM6NT AND CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT 91-20 - SHELL OIL - A request to net eblleh • gee etaiion, mini-market, and car wash on a 1.31 ace parcel in the Medium Ru ldential deeignat ion, (R-14 dwelling unite per acre( oC the Tent VLta Planned Co®unlty, located at the southwest corner of Rap Line Roed and Rochutes Avenue - APN+ 227-151-17. Staff recommend^ issuance of a Negat lee Declaration. RelaGd file: Tentative Parcel Map 13987. (Continued from December 17, 1991) Scott Murphy, Auocl-t• Dlannec, pruentad tM staff report commae•SOrer Melchor asked hcw many other prvice station mini-markets in the City nave the hours oL agration limited, pay telephones prahibldd, and video surveillance caawrru reg4lzod. Hr. Murphy responded this would be the flat. Cammi a inner Meicher stated he understood the rnsoninq for the pcond and third conditicne. He asked LL staff had received •ny opposit Lon from the applicant regarding the prapood conditions. Pla r.n Lng Comml a ion Mlnutu ~n7r' January B, 1992 ~(.1. Mr. MurpF.y replied that the applicant ha3 only objected to !hs lim it atten of haute. Cnatrman Mc 9ie1 opened the public hearing. C eorge ?heodorou, Forma, 10'190 civic ca nt sr Drive, #100, Rancho cue amonga, requea~ed clarification on Condition 12 regarding video eu rveillanee. He asked if Sheil'e et andard set-up would be what et off wa• seek irg. He oL•ee rued that Shell cFerates many et at tone on a 24-houz baeie with relatively little vantlaltsm or come. He commented that She 11 fee ie that having the station c Fer ate on a 26 hour baeie is a deterrent to to iterinq and vandalism and p,-ovitlee tet!er cc nl rol. He felt that if the station were closed during the evening hours, [hare wou id be more opportunity for vandalism. He ai so indicated that Shell requ irea *_hat the location be open 24 haute per day to order to achieve ar, acceptable profit. He observed that the Bite will be the l argeet She11 atat ion site because of the additional required landec api^.g and the driveway requ it emen!e. Ne noted that ae it will ba their lar gear and meet ex pens the etatton, they rvi11 not be able tc operate it on a part time baeie. He comment etl thz.t the et ati ~ ie a neighborhood vt at ion, not a freeway location. He said Shell seeks to provide aerv ice [o the community 24 hours per tlay, including serving coffee at 2;00 a. m. Chairman McNiel commented that the relocation ct the vacuum •talle had been die<ueaad. Hr. Murphy noted that Condition 10 raga fired telocat ion of the vacuums to the eat iefactinn of the City Planner. ~ Chairman McHial suggested ::,ey bs relocated to the exit of the car wavh by Base Line Road. Mr. ?FSOdorcu agraad. Comm teaioner Toletoy asked if the surveillance camerae would still be in uee iE She11 should sell the stet ion. Larry Roea, Shell Oil, 19 Quiet H111• Road, Pomona, stated the surveillance aystam would be sold to an incoming dealer. He stated the system works over telephone lines. Comm ieeioner Me lc Mr asked for the experience oC the Sheriff's et atton regarding opera[ lone 24-hoar-par-day mini-market Cecilit lee. Mr. Hu cphy ruponded that tM Sheriff's department had prov Sded information regard.ng calls to five locations. He as 1^ that the Mob11 011 stet ion at Vineyard and Arrow had 48 total calls •inu October 1989 including 32 petty theft, 2 hurglar,~, 3 drunk Ln public, 2 <red it card a[feneee, 2 malictoue m iachivf, i kidn app Lrg, and 1 as cult with a deadly wupan. He noted that the Stop-N-GO had 53 roc al ca11• since Suly 1988 includ lnq 25 petty theft, J bu rglary, 3 alcohol related, ] au cult/battery, 7 collleion, 5 malic :oue mtechief, and 7 miecelleneous. Piano tog C;nun tee ion Minutaa tg.~- January 8, :i?: ~~I ~F-_. Commies ioner Helcher ae ked for ^mments regartl ing average number of cane Hr. Hurphy said there were an average of 13 ca 11e per year of var ices degrees, with the majority Ceing far Fatty theft and miecellaneoue much reE types of _:feneee. He as id there hays been a total of 9 robber iea at 5 Lccat io ne over rte last 3 to 4 years. csmraeicnet Helcher ae ked if the Sher iff'e Department had given any comments. Hr. Hurphy resporded nega t'ivel y. Comm ieeioner Me lcher observed that it did not eeund like a problem. Comm ieeioner Ch it iaa ae ked if. statist ice ware obtained for the Mobil station on the ccrner of Lemon and Haven. Mr. Hurphy responded that over the last four years there had been a total of 25 calls inc :..:d ing 1 robbery, 2 aeeeu It with a deadly weapon, 2 burglary, B petty theft, ~ col Lieion, 1 ma Lcioue mie chief, and 7 miscsllaneoue including paeaing of a Eict it ious chock and annoying telephone calla. Richard Hager, Lewis Homes Hanagame nt Corporation, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upiand, noted that the report did not indicate the time of day of the calla for aervic e. He avid it was tatalLy conceivable that the majority of the calls were during daylight hours. Ja eeph Oleeon, Lewis Nomea Hanagament Cotporat ion, 1156 North Mount sin Avenue, vp la nd, ae ked for relief from the conditions requiring off-sire improvements Eor drainage and street improvement e. He referenced hie Ju 1y 36, 1991, leper in u+h ich he had expte seed the opinion that the Terra Vista Street and Drainage lmprovemer~t Implementation pol Sties ware originally adopted in the context of large residential developments. Ha remarked ha undsratcod iG was not the purview of the Commission to drop the conditions, but M requested that the Commies ion make a recommendation that the City council permit a variance from the polic See becau ea it is a smell project. Hearing no Curt her testimony, Chairman McN Ssl cloned the pub lit hearing. Commie ioner Tolstoy remarked that the buf faring between the station and the future multi-Camily project Go she south 1e utrsmely important. He euggeetetl a condition bs added to ensure that the landacaplnq is maint wined and the eh ru be era not aware ly pruned to allow more visibility to the at ation. grad Buller, C!ty PLannsr, suggsat ed that standard condition 6.16 be mod rE ied to cage ire that shrub maintenance criteria be aubmlttad for City Planner revrew and approval. Chairman HcNis1 reopened the public hearing to ask iE the applicant woe :d ogres to the add it ionel rage ic•msnt. Hr. Theodarou remarked Chat Shs ll Oil would agree to the add It ionel wording. P1a nn.nq Camm ice ron Minutes /9-• January 9, ~i2 OZ Chairman HcNtel again closed the public hearing c<mTiee icner Chi!iea opp<eed the inters ity of the use adjacent to residence e. she stated that if the project were to be approved, she supported any mit tgation measures including limiting the hours of the mini-market. Comm iss _ener Valletta agreed. she eemarked that the applicant had indicated they wished to ba open 24 hours to service the nesd• of the community. She noted that there are several 24-hour grocery stores in the sr ea ah ich could sere ;ce the community. commrse io r.er Helcher observed that the applicant would not have the power to ers urs that landscape plane for the future rea idant ial property to the south include a minimum 25-foot lantl scope setback. Hr. Hu rphy stated the condition was added Co put the developer on notice that the requirement will be included in the zeeidanttal project. comsieeioner Melchor noted that the Condit io n• rsquir• trash bins to have counter-weighted tide. He ae ked if such bins are available from the rubb Lah company. Can Coleman, principal Planner, et at ad it wa• hie undsretendinq that the City requ ire• all trash franchieee• to provide that type of container. He noted City Council policy requires counter-weighted lids. Mr. Murphy 9uggeeted adding the wording 'it available.' Cgmmieeioner Melchor remarked that ohs chain link over rho trash bin enclgeure ahqu ld be under the treL11s. Ha felt <hs hour of operst iun •hould not ba restricted and the facility •hou Ld be permitted to operate 26 hours pet day, He auggeated that the candLt ion regarding video eurvelllnnce be clarified to indicate the equipment •hould ba equal to the beet installed in any other shell et at ions. Conmleeioner Ne lcher observed that the coed Ltione require an in-Lieu fee £qr future undezarounding of overhead ut iLitla• on the gppoo its e ids of Rochester. He cgmmented that the City had just completed parkway beautlf is ation in that area and the land L nlrudy developed. He asked iE iho lines would ever be undergrounded. Barrye Hanson, ssnLOr CLv it Engineer, roponded that Lt L• Laprobable that the linen will bs under grounded but he thought they may be. Comm iesioner Malcher asked Lt a developer can request a refund aftoc a pec iotl of time if the undergzqunding hu not tnkm piece. Mr. Hanson responded that such a period has not been defined. Chairmen McNiel observed that oven though the po •eibility that the lines will bs undergcounded may be remote, it doe• ea1eL. He felt the City must prepare Eor that pees ibility. Commie ions[ Malcher thought perhaps et some point the Clty could make acme choiu• where underground lag iq needed and utilize [he funds Sn another acaa. Plana.nq Comm ienion Mlnutos }3a^" January d, ,?32 iv3 ~rrr~e~r „~ - 4 Mr. Hanson at aced the Euntle era earmarked by ioc ation Comm ie eioner Hoi Cher at ated that he was invclved when the :errs Vi eta St rest improvement Implementation Policy was developed and ha recalled that the City had dEVeto pad the policy because of impatience with she developer's tract-by- tract approach. He thought the ..uject iva is worthwhile, but ^e telt the requ irenent was excessive for this small development and was not ^_he intent of the poi icy when it was adopted. Ha suggest ed that the Commission recommend to the City council that relief ba given. Ha said that ne was rot involved with the adoption of the Ora inaga improvement Implementation Policy, but he felt the intent was the same. Ha thought that since adoption of the policy, San Antonio Medical Facility wa• coast ru cted with a detention bavin which only serves it. He su ggeet ed that the City council yield on the policy. Ha thcught Engineering Ca nd it ion 4 should be clarified to at eta which developer will maintain the entry monument - Lewis Hama• or Shell. Ha felt it would be excessive to requ izc that She11 Oil install the Base Ltne Road median landecapinq from Milliken to Roc heeter Avenue. Ccmmiesionar Valletta thought the landecapinq median i• partially built Eor HLSlikan. Mr. Hurphy responded that it i• currently undo[ construction and ehcu Ld bo completed by the time Sha11 oil is raatly to gull permits. He remarked that the condition wa• included to ensure that the median will be completed. He noted that the iocan[ of the contlit ion regarding entry monument maintenance was to alert She11 011 that the city will not maintain the monument. He et ated the monument ie currently elated to be Located on Snell Oil's property. He conjectured that Sha11 oil antl Lewis have a wpa[ate agreement regarding installation of the monument. He commented that if the City had to er~f errs maintananca of the landecapinq, the City will he con_act ing the property owner. He oeid Lewis Home• ha• a •iqn location designated Eor the corner but they arc under no obligation to construct the sign. Chairman NcNtal suggested that the condition be reworded to raga ire a monument sign. Commissioner Melchor •tatad that hi• or iglnal concern wu that the ca nd Lt ion include• the wards '1[ canstru ctad^ which would uem to Lmply there is no ca reainty [het the sign ulll be constructstl. Chairmen HcNisl mggea ted deleting 'if co nstru c[ed" end ind lc at ing that meintonanc• woultl ba the respons ib it ity of the tenant ineteatl of the tlew lopcr. Hr. Henson suggested that if ohs Comm lesion wanted to be sur• the eLgn to co net roc btl, a condition •havld t• placed under the Plenntnq sect ton. Commlssicncc Ch It SS• foLt th• street improvement and dralnego condo.one should remain. Cheixmen McNiol oburved chat Commieslonor Melchor had sugggbd that relief be given regard Lng the rellet of construct ing Rochester Avenu• end she of orm draLn •o long as en unsafe rend it icn i• not created. Planning Comm inoion Hlnuts• }bl~- January 9, ;,9: I r ~"xH•e~7" aF - s Commissioner Nelcher remarked that he did not believe it was the intent of the or ig snot Po liciee to create Bach an unequally werghted situation for each a small development. Ha thought it was the intent of the original policies to get the develc par to put in the :nfraet zucture in a logical, orderly faeh io n. Cc mmieeiorer Ch it sea ae ksd how that could be accomplie had if the commies ion ke spa relieving is dividu al part ale of pzopert y. Ccmm seasoner Melcher commented that Lew ie should never be relieved Commieeicn er Valletta commented that when the Lucky Center was originally built the policy drd not require undezgzoundinq. She recalled that recently two email parceie in the center were pz oceeeed and they were r.ot relieved of the regv irement. Commieeioner Tolatoy Eelt it should be a Councii decision and the commission should not make a recommendation. He eaitl that in light of Faet problems with streets, the Ccnvniaeion should not seal with it but iretaad thou ld allow the City Council to make their awn interpretation of requirements. Commiseior.er thirsts agreed. Chairman NcNiel noted that Commieeionaz Halehar had euggeeted perhaps rewording the trash enclosure conditions. Commissioner Tcletoy obssrvetl that the City's at erdard drawing for trash enclosures would provide ufflcient dir act ion. ~. Commieeioner Nelcher observed that the applicant had raised a question about the ee curity ay stem. Nr. Nurphy noted that it was never etaft'e intent to raga ire more Chan what Shell had pro po eed, Mr. Bu 11er agreed and suggested that it the Coersi a ion wished to indicate the eurve silents system would bs subject to approval by the City Planner, staff would verify that the system would adequately addzsu the entire site, not duet the building. Chairman NcNiel reopened the public hearing and esksd why Shell Oil objected to pay telephone. Nr. Rote responded that She11 Oil feels that pay telephones encourage la staring. chairmen 4eNie1 asked if they would be willing to include • pay telephcne ins :de the mini-market. Nz. Ross reap.-,nded neget lvsly. Chairman NcNiel again cloud tM public heering Piano r.g Comm:eeion Minutes ti.D3'd Sa nuary 8, '. ~~> ,Yf/isil " G" Commiaeioner Chitiea questioned if the City ehculd prohibit pay tel ephonea. She thought it should ba ens owners' nreregat iva. Chairman HcNlel stet ed that salesmen use a tot of pny tale phones and bacauve the eta^_icn ie isolated it may make eenoe to have a pay phone rn case vomeona has a breakdown. Ccmmieeio ner Melc her supported the condition prohibiting pay telephanev. Ha remarketl Ghat hie Homeowners' Aeeociat ion had removed the pay telephone Erom the swimming pool aien of their comples because it waa 6e ing used at all hour by people who were not even resident• to conduct all sorts of unlawful act ivitise. Commies ionar Tolstoy remarked that hr had talked to a uzvice oration operator who hatl hie pay telephone removed because he said it waa often used for drug deals. He fe it the Commiaaicn should nrohib Lt pay telephone. Regarding limiting the hours, Chairman HcNiel romme ntad that the applic ant had propoaetl a 24 Four operation. He felt the activity at the service star ion would r.ot ba greatly increeeed by the mini-market i.l the late hoe re. He Es Lt that iE the station were open, the mini-msrkat •hculd also be left open. He thought that cloainq the mini-market would not affect potent sal crime. Commis ionar Tolstoy asked about noise fnctora. No thought the entice station should be closed after 11:00 p.m. Ne asked Lf the pumps would be the type where a credit card could be inurgd Ln the pampa. Chairman HcNiol reopened the public hearing. Hr. Aoe :eeponded that the moat advanced system which ecupta credit cards at the pump. However, he said i[ would still be a manned oparat ion far safety reavone. Chairman McNLel again cloud the publLc hear Snq. Codsaioner Tolstoy coevented that he voted for • utvice stet son bateau M feels one Se certainly needed In the are and i^ located on busy •enete, eaeo Line and Aochu ter. Re said it had bun hie under et ending that there could be limits on the hour of operation. He did not feel that a• a ne ighborhootl et at Lon In a resident sal neighborhood it •nould nwd to W open 24 hoe cs. Notion: Moved b;• Valls2 te, seconded by Chitin, to prepare s rosoluticn of denial for Environmental Aeeunnt and Conditional Uu Permit 91-20. Metion carried by the following vote: AYESt COMM ISSIONEA9: CNITIEA, TOLSTOY, VA[,LETT6 N069t CONK ISSIONEA9o HCNIEL, MELCHER A85£NT: COHMIS9IONEAgo NONE -casrlsd Planning Commie ion HSnuta• tAY~ aanuary B, :391 ~~~ t."x.~/i~j" F - 7 " Notion: Roved by Chit iee, seconded by Melchor, unanimously carried, to adopt the Hinut ee of December 17, 1991, ae emended. CONSENT CAL EtlDAA A. EW IRONMENT ASS 5 CO O AL USE PERMIT 91-ZO - SHEkL 0~2 - Reeolution o£ denial cE a raqueei to establish a gas station, mini-market, and car wash on a 1.31 acc+ parc+l in the Medium Residential designation, (8-14 dwelling units per ecr+) of the Torre Vista Planned community, located at the eouthws+t turner of Eaea Line Road and Rmchaster Avenue - APN: 227-151-17. (Continued from Jnnuarp E, 1992.) e. ENV'RONHENTAI. AS 5 W C 03 V. 5. HoHE CoRpOFATION - Reaolut ion o[ dm1a1 of a request to amend certain development et andarda within the Etiwenda 9pecif is Plan a• deacti bed below: 1i To allow single family detached resident ial development wLthin the Medium Aee id+nt ial District (8-14 dwelling units par ecr+) utilizing Basic Developm+nt Stead nrda7 and 2) To reduce the minimum averaq+ lot •ize from 10,000 squaza feat to 8,900 equate Eeat wLthin the Low N+dium Ruldentlal DLtzlct (4-8 dwsllinq units par ecr+) under Basic Owelopmant Standazds( and 3) To reduce th+ minLsum avarag+ lot •ize from 10,000 aqusrs fast to A,500 •quara fast withLn the Medium Auidsn[L1 Oietrict (e-16 dwelling units par ecr+) under Baa1c Dsvalopment Standards. (Continued from January 8, 1992.) C. TIRE EXTENSION FOR TBNTATTVB TMCT 13835 - HOMESTEAD - A r+queet for a rims ext+naion for a neidentlal subdlvi•ion of 70 •Lngle family late on 25 acres o[ land Sn th+ Lou Resident Sal Dlstr let (Z-4 dwelling unlt• per acre) located nt th+ northeast corner of Highland and Rochester - APN: 225-152-01 through Od and 3E. D. TIH6 EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVB TRACT 14055 - NODBRN COAPORATSON - A request for a time axt+nslon Lor a 3-lot subd Lv Lian and d+elgn review of I15 condominium unLL on 10.27 acres o[ land In th+ Medium Ae•Ldential Olat rlct (8-16 dw 111nq unite per acre), located north mf Arzow Highway and seat of Baker Avows - APNI 207-201-32 and 12. Ttem A was pulled for dLCUU ion. Motion: Mov+d by Chlt lea, seconded by Vsl Utta, to adopt Ttema e, C, and D of she Consent Calendar. A. E~tj_ONMENTAL aS3633MENT ANO CONDSTIONAL USE PBPNIT 91-ZO Chairman HcNial Snvited pu611c comment. Plana inq Conm LasLcn Hinute• t2~ January 22, 1997. JO F,1'/,f/B/f ~i ,~ George Theodoreu, Forma, 10790 Civic Center Orive, 1100, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he was rapre venting Shell Oil. He request ad clarif ieat ion on the reaclution regarding the fintl ing that there waa inadequate buffering to mit igate the impacts of the at at io r, on the adjoining residential area. Ha asked if it was the intention of the Conm ieeion to tleny the a~plicat ion based cn the buffering. There were no add itionel public comment e. Comm ieeioner Chitiea commented that she did not believe the uea ie appropr iota directly ad]acent to a residential area. She felt the impact is too great and additional buffering would be needed. Comanieeio ner Valletta agreed th ac there was inatlequ ate buffering. CoRSnieeioner Toletoy thought the buffering may be adequate. He said he had voted against the project because of the proposed 2a-hour por day oparat ion in a residential neighborhood. Coaania cio ner Chitiea commented commissioner Toletoy nod objet tod to the operation becau ea of it• proximity to the reoidencae, and therefore, it appeared the buffering from the neighborhood wa• in adoqu ate. Commissioner Toletoy felt the landscaping to be sufficient buffer irg for dny time operations, but not night time. He agreed thnt eho statement regarding inadequate buffering ehculd remain in the the recto lotion. Notion: Moved by Chitiea, eoconded by Talatoy, to ndopt the roso lot ion denying Environmental Assessment and Conditional Ue• Permit 91-20. Motion carried by the fallowing vote: AYES: CONN ISS IONEAS: CH ITIEA, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: CONMISSIONERS: NCNIEL, MELCHSR ABSENT: COMNISS IDNERSi NONE -c err Led PUBLIC E. T<NVIRONHENTAL IlLPACT R_PORT FOA SPECIPIC P AN 90 O1 AND G N AL PLAN A.4ENOMENT 90-038 - CITY OP AAnCHO CUCANONGa - A public hoering to comment on the draft final envlronmont al Smpact report prepared for the Et iwanda North Spoc if is P1 en and Gonetal Alen Amendment 90-03B tc pre vane approx lmably 6,840 acres of Corr Rory in the Rancho Cu cemonga sphere of Ln flu sore to provide for 3,613 of ogle fam Lly dwelling unite on 2,477 scree of vacant land, 2B ecru of neighborhood commorciel uw, 4 ec hoe lc, 5 parka, an equutrian cantor, and pre urv atlan oC 4,112 ecru of open apace generally located north of Highl end Avenue (Stab Roue 30), south cf the San Barnes rd Lno National Forest, wart of the City of Fontana, end east of Milliken Avsnuo. (Continued from Janusry 0, 1992.) 2iannLng CommteeLon Minot e• Llt~ January 22, :r92 l c~Q RESOLUTION N0. ----- A RESOLUTION OT THE PLANNING COMHISSION Oe^ THE CITY CF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFOR,N iA~ DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PEFHIT NO. 91-20, A REQUEST TO ESTAELISH A GAS STATION, HINI-MARAE T, AND CAA WASH ON A 1. J1 ACRE PARCEL IN THE HEDiUH RESIDENTIAL ^ESIGNATION (R-la DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE EOUTH{vB ST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER dVENUE, AND HARING FINDINGS I:1 SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-151-1]. A. Rec itale. (i~ shell 011 Company hoe filed an applLcation for the issuance of the Conditional Uae Permit No. 91-''<0 a• docrlbsd in the title of .his Reaolut ion. Here ineftsr in ehie Reeolui ion, the subject Condit icnal Uae Permit request is re ESrred to ae ^the appLication.' (ii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Crnunission conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued •a Ld public he ar inq to allow the dsvelopment plane to ba resubmitted to the Deelgn Review Conmittee. (iii) On the 17th day of December 1991, th• Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hear inq on the application and cant inusd said hearing to January B, 1991. (iv) On the 8th day of January 1991, the Planning Commission o£ the city of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing or. ehai date. The Planning Ccmm lse ion tlirected that a Resolut ion of Denial ba prepared for the January 22, 1992, meeting. (v) All legal prerequin lees prLOr to the adopt LOn of th le ReacLut :en have occurred. D. aeeo lut ion. NON, THEREFORi, it 1• hsisby found, dstetml Md, and zuolved by the Planning Commlu ion oC the CLCy of Rancho Cucamonga a follows 1. Th 1^ CommLalon hereby spsciCLCally flnd• Chat ell of the '.acre sec forth in the RetLttL, Pert A, of thL Resolution srs true and cor.ect. 2. ea Nd upon •ubet art ial evidence prumted to this Ca m:aa; .r. during the above-ref sr engd public hearing• on DsCSmber 17, 1991, and :am.,a cy R, 1992, me lud Lng written and oral st etf reports, eager her with ...._ 'set imony, th i• Co~iu ior. hereby epecAf ically finds a• fo lloWa: (a) TM application appllu to property local ad ac cre lout hweat ccrnar of Bus Line Road and Rochutsr Avenue With a street f. -r ~.a :e of 250 feat along Rau Lin• Rcad and 176 feet along Rochutsr Ave sae. parcel ie present ly vacant; and f (> P'..TNNING CO MM:S SION -ESOLOT.ON NO. .._-., CJP 91-20 - SHELL C COMPANY Sanuary Z3, 1393 Page 2 (b) TM properties to tM north and gnat era zoned for and being tleveloped with •inyl• family reeidencu. TM ptopartSU to the south and west are zonod for multi-family unite and era vacant) and (c) Under tM Terra Vista Community Pin, wcviee at atione and related uses (mini-market and car wa •h) era defined as "Community Pac it it iee^ and are permitted Ln any zoning designation •lonq tRe major arter isle (ease ins, Milliken, or. Rcehuter) subj act to trvisw and approval of a Conditional L'ee Pe rmit~ and (d) TM appllcat ion contemplaNa tM Z6-hoot opsrat ion cE a qaa et at ion, mini-market, and car washy and (a) Under eM Terra Vista Community Planr +n adaqu me separation shall M provided betwan a urvlee station and ru Ldsnk is 1. areas in the form of a street, add it ionsl landscape utbtck, or other "buffer" of non-ru idant Lel use utLLctory to the Planning CamUSion. As proposed, ir.autf is SSni buCterinq ex iat• to sdaquaUly aitigats the Lmp¢ta of the proposed operation on tF.• adjoining ru Ldentially zonod arise) and (f) Vnder the Terra Vista Ca®unity Pi m, the appzopriatenee• of the lacailons of wrvlee stations, including car wsha• and convenience retail (mini-muU), ^hall M determined by tM P1aMlnq Cc®Lo Lon during the conditional Uw Permit proeue) one (y) TM proposed 2d-hour a day oparaiion o! the gn• etas ion, car wash, and mini-market will ruult in sxceulve vMlculaz traf Lic, vehic lee left running, radios p1+yLnq, K0., ttaatinq axcauiw noise, sic emissions, and an intensity of use which L incompat iDla with the ruidant ial aces. 3. Based upon tM eubatant Lal evidence pnwnted Go this Comm ieeion during ehs above-raterancad public hearing and upon tM apacif is rind inge cf facts sat forth in paragraph 1 and Z above, this Co®luicn hereby finds and concludes a• Lo Mown (a) That tM proposed use la not in accord with the General Plan, tM objectives of tM Development Cade, and the purpowa of the diet rice in which eM siG 1• located. (b) That tM prapoud uu will W datr imental to the public health, safety, or w1Lra oz materially inj uriou^ to propart iee oc improvements in the vicinity. 6. [7aasd upon tM Cinding• and cone lusion• ut forth Sn paragraphs 1, Z, and 7 above, thin Coemiuicn Mrehy danLn tM application. 5. Tha Secretary to this Commie ion shall certify to the adoption of this Raeolut ion. l 'i PLANNING COMMISSION RT ~LJT ION NO. y___„ CUP 91-10 - SHELL OIL .'4PANY January 22, 1992 P nqe 3 APPROV60 AND ADOPTED THIS 32ND DAY OP JA.WAAY 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: / I/.G(J~ o~ ~~ ~LC(X "~ Larry L~ 1 el, Cha man ATTEST: Brad , 9s sta I, Brad Bu llsr, Secretary of Chs PLnnlnq Co®lssion of ihs Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, da hereby certify that the foregoing Aewlution vas duly and regularly introduced, paced, and adopted by the P1aMinq ComooLelon of the City of Rancho Cucatonga, at • reguLr meeting of the Planning CcamU•ion hold on the 22nd day of January 1992, by the tolltwrinq vote-towitt AYP.SS COlMI99IONEA9t CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMI98IONEA9t NCNIEL, MELCHER ABSENT: COMMI9SIONERSt NONE -" -CITY' OF RAtiCHO CLY'.~\iJVGA _ MEMORANDUM `~~- ~ DATE: February 18, 199 T0: SCOTT MURPHY, Associate Flanner FROM: MICHAEL INGRAH, Adm~nrstzatrve ireutenant ~ SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-20 - SHELL OIL POLICE CASES A"..' SELECTED STORES - PART 2 As 70^ requested, I have attached information regarding the addresses of 9524 FootP,ill Boulevard (Shell Oil) and 6411 Haven Avenue !Unocal). I am unable to provrde you with the times of occurrences fcr the locations suhmrtted to you December 27, 1991, as that information has been purged. we have the capahility of obtai r.rng times of incidence but only for those occurrences 60 to 90 days lust prior to the date of rnqurry. By way of observation, the Police Department has noticed greater calls fcr service at minx-marts to be on Friday and 3atu r::ay nights hetween E:00 p.m. till midnight. The problems usually stem from a higher volume of juvenile weekend traffic Mrth petty the tr "beer runs" being very prevalent. Another observation involves three discinct factors; 1. Available services/products ~i 2. Availability of alcohol 3. Prime lO V`dt10^ !lrnr-marts involve all of these far_tors which results in hi ;her customer volume. Greater customer volume along with .es~/ ', a~;cessab il.rty o£ alcohol w:.i1 generally require greater ser: ~~~ f rem low <_nforcenent. Aqa vi, !?1e v; e_ let me know if you r?quire any further assrsta;~'~~ cr information. N~ ~ 11 ~~ _ ~ ~~~_,,. SHELL OIL 9524 FOOTHILL BLVD. DATE CRIME \ INCIDENT !SE R'PEMBER 26, 1989 i FORGERY i `JULY 2 :989 PETTY THEFT JUNE 25, __ 1989 DISTURBING THE PEACE JUNE 23, ~ 1989 INDECENT ERPGSURE AUGUST .4 , i99i 'S RAFFIC ACCIDENT-MINOR INJ. ~'t 20, 1 591 BATTERY MAY 8, 19 91 FOUND PROPERTY MARCH 21, 1991 MALICIO L'S MISCHIEF ~tfAFCH 26, 1991 IMPERSONATING AN 0£FICER UNOCAL 6411 HAVEN AVENUE DATE CRIME \ INCIDENT SEPTEMBER 13, 1990 TRAFFIC COLLISION-NON-INJURY JULY 17, 1990 BURGLARY JUNE 16, 1990 TAMPERING WITH VEHICLE ffAY 8, 19 90 PETTY THEFT HARCH 22, 1991 BURGLARY MARCH 3, 1991 BURGLARY JANUARY 2 1, 1992 CREDIT CARD OFFENSE DECEHBER 10, 1991 HIT & RUN - NON-INJURY CITY OF HAtiCHO CL-CA\SU~GA MEMORANDUM DA.'S: December 2 1991 TO: SCU7T HURPHY, Associa ce Flanner i'ROIi: BRUCE ZEZT~:R, Chief or Police BY: lfTL7/AEL ZAGRAN, Administrative lieutenant SUBJECT: POLICE CXSES AT SELECTED lQNI-rWRkbT S7URES ~r- Z have attached a Sist of incidences occurring at Che five mini-market stores you have targeted for use as a measuring device in reference Lo the appiacati on ror a CONDITIONAL USE PERHZT 91-10 - by SHFr.r. OSl,. the instances are no[ necessarily m chronological order. i nape Brat the rnforma Cion that I have provided will assist m your presen tauon to the Planning Commass:on on January 8, 1992. Fiease let me Ynow if you re9uire any further assistance or _nfozma uon C~ ~1 Bi7>~ $i Atch m lit: listing o2 Poltce Cases tor: 8519 Vineyard Avenue - Hobil Oil 7187 Archibald Avenue -Stop-N-Go 9533 Foothall Blvd. - AH/PH Hini-MarkeC (Arco) 18477 Lemon Avenue - Hobtl Oil 9315 Base Line Rd - Hobii O.1 H7BZL6 OIL 8514 VDIEYAAD AVENUE RATE CRIH6 \ 171C]DENT .VO'JE1fEER L', 1991 PETTY THEFT NOVE1fBER 9, :991 PETTY THEFT OCTOBER 31, 1991 PETTY TItEFT JCT OBER 13, 1991 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON OCTOBER o, 1991 PETTY THEFT SEPTLTQ3ER 30, 1991 PETTY TXEFT SEPTEM9ER Zd, 1991 PETTY THEFT SEFTElIDER 29, 1991 PETTY TFlEFT SEPTEMBER Z5, 1991 PETTY THEFT AUGUST ZZ, 1991 PETTY THEFT AUGUST 22, 1991 PETTY THEFT JULY 13, 1991 PETTY THEFT JULY 6, 1991 PETTY THEFT JUNE 30, 1991 KIDNAPPING 1fAY 24, 1991 PETTY THEFT F7AY 70, 1991 PETTY THEFT 1/AY 18, 1991 DRUNX ZN PUBLIC MAY 4, 1991 PETTY TXEFT h1ARCH 29, 1991 COUNTERFEITING MARCH 74, 1991 PETTY THEFT MARCH 1, 1991 PETTY THEFT FEBRUARY 27, 1991 CREDIT CARD OFFENSE FEBRUARY 18, 1991 FEBRUARY 16, 1991 MALICIOUS FD'SCHIEF DRUNX I11 PUBLIC _ I, ~~ GECErBER 14, 1990 DECEMBER 3, 1990 NUVEHBER 30, 1990 PETTY THEFT PETTY TXEFT INCIDENT/I4SC LAW ZNF CALL ~ -~ _ J ~u NOVEl~ER 9, 1990 BURGLARY _ 1~ NOVE7lBER d, 1990 PETTY TF~FT ___.._. OCTOBER 73, 1990 PETTY THEFT I _._11 Page Z of d pages 1~~ rnBas Ozz 8.514 VINEYARD AVENI~ Continued OCTOBER 13, 1998 AREA CXECK REpUESTED OCTOBER 1, 1990 EFffiEZZI.EN7dENT SEPTE+IDER 30, 1990 BURGLARY AUGUST 29, 1990 PETTY THE1'T AUGUST 16, 1990 PETTY THEFT AUGUST Z5, 1990 PETTY THEFT JULY 31, 1990 PETTY THEFT JULY 23, 1990 PETTY TtIEFT JULY 19, 1990 HALICZOUS HISCHZEF JUNG 17, 1990 PETTY THEFT ,TUNE 16, 1990 PETTY THEFT HAY 25, 1990 CREDIT CARD OFFENSE HAY 31, 1990 PETTY THEFT APRIL 18, 1990 PETTY T!¢,TT APRIL 16, 1990 PETTY THEFT NOVEHBER 18, 1989 DRi/ldf IN PUBLIC NOVEL®ER 11, 1989 VEHICLE 11~W REPORT OC710BER 27, 1989 PETTY THEFT flip Page 3 of 8 pages STOP-N-GO ARCHIBAID AVENUE 7287 ~~ / II7~~ PATS -INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION NON NCH 7, 1988 PETTY THEFT ER 17, 1987 SEPTEt~ BURGLARY sCHIEF US MI 1988 AUGUST 27, ,yp1,ICZ0 FZC COLLISION Y TRAF AUGUST 20, 1988 NON-INJUR 0U8 MISCHIEF 1988 dUGUST e, MpLZCI 1988 NLy 26, PETTY T'~T 30, 1990 BEPT~ER BATTERY ER 2, 1990 SEPTEMB BURGLARY AUGUST 7, 1990 PETTY Tf~PT JULY 16, 1990 PETTS' 17¢FT JULY li, 1990 PETTY THEFT ~, PORT OF PLANT ~~ VINE 28, 1990 E FMS , JUNE 1, 1990 BION PETTY TAT COI.LI JURY TRAFFIC JUNE 7, 1990 0 NON-IN LEN VEHICLE MARCH 15, 199 STO NCH 12, 1990 PETTY T~'T LAW INF. CALL EBRUARY 27. 1990 INCIDENT/NIEC. ~ F JANU~Y iq, 1990 SCHIEP MALICIOUS MZ 1990 JANUARY 14, PETTY TAT NOVE!®ER 26. 1989 PETTY TUFT ,1,~,SS '~I A ~ NOVEI~ER 12, 1989 ~p(IDATING COLLISION Y TRAFFIC OCTOBER q, 1989 9 - NON-IJdJUR BCHIE£ --~ UB NI BEPTElIDER 18, 198 .__ MALZCZO AUGUST 29, 1989 PETTY THEFT NON-~'JUR Y -~-- AUGUST 12, 1989 ._--~ HIT y RUN ~- OLICE OF JULY 11, 1989 _ RESIBTING P _ ..__ 1989 5 _ PETTY T~F-T~ CE TAN , JULY 0~ _ NFL CONTR HAY 2g, 1989 - ~,pER I EBRUARY 20, 1989 PETTY PNEFT F DECEF®ER 2b, 1991 Page q °f a Pages ~`1 51OP-N~'Oi 7287 ARCIIIPAID AVEM16 Continued NOVEMBER li, 1991 BURGLARY OCTOBER 28, 1991 PETTY THEFT OCTOBER 19, 1991 AREA CHECK REQUESTED SEPTEPIDER ?O, 1991 PETTY THEFT OCTOBER 11, 1991 ASSAULT KITH DEADLY WEAPON SEPTE!®ER 29, 1991 PETTY THEFT SEPTElIDER 19, 1991 NON-INJLRY TRAFFIC COLLISION AUGUST 2i, 1591 DISORDERLY CONDUCT AUGUST 27, 1991 PETTY THEPT AUGUST 12, 1991 I7IPERSONATION OF PEACE OFFICER AUGUST 2, 1991 NON-INJURY TRA££IC COLLISION JULY 29, 1991 PETTY THEFT JULY 17, 1991 HINOR IN POSSESSION ALCOHOL JULY 6, 1991 PETTY T11EF'T JUNE 30, 1991 PETTY THEFT JUNE 9, 1991 PETTY THEFT JUNE 13, 1991 ORUNX ZN PUBLIC JUNE 9, 1991 PETTY T}HEEE'T HAY 4, 1991 RESISTING POLICE OFFICER APRIL 15, 1991 PETTY THEFT MARCH 11, 1991 PETTY THEFT FEBRUARY 9, 1991 PETTY THEFT FEBRUARY 2, 1991 PETTY THEFT Page 15 of 8 pages \~~ ArLPH 1~YI-7IARICbT (ARC10J 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD. LHTS CRIHE / AKTAEA? SEPTENBER 15, 1989 R089ERY AUGUST 22, 1989 iXCZDENT/MiSC LAW INF CALL JUNE 18, 1989 ACCIDENT W//~IINOR INJURIES ~7/NE 6, 1989 BURGLARY MAY 26, 1958 DESERTING CHILD UNDER 14 DECEMBER 15, 1987 NON-INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION NOVEPIDER 17, 1987 HIT 6 RUN NON-INJURY AUGUST 27, 1987 PETTf' THEFT DECEl~FJ7 14, 1991 .'LUSCIOUS 1ffSCTfIF.E' NOVEIIDF.R 30, 1991 ROBBERY NOVEAIDER 8, 1991 BATTERY OCTOBER 25, 1991 SHOOTING AT WIG9BITED DWELLING AUGUST 29, 1990 BURGLARY AUGUST 10, 1990 &9TTERY AUGUST 5, 1990 NON-INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION JULY 22, 1990 ORUNX IX PUBLIC JUNE 8, 1990 NON-INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION NOVEHBER 9, 1989 BATTERY OCTOBER 29, 1989 NON-INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION OCTOBER 20, 1989 BATTERY AUGUST 6, 1988 PETTY THEFT NOVEHBER 8, 1991 ROBBERY MAY 27, 1991 FOUND PROPERTY HAY 11, 1991 NON-INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION HAY 8, 1991 PETTY THEFT HARCN 1, 1991 STOLEN VEHICLE DEC1J-IDER 15, 1990 DRUNX IN PUBLIC NOVEMBER 30, 1990 + _~ ROBBERY NOVFJ~IDER 19, 1990 - NON-INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION i Page tiI ofq8 pages 1 1 1 NDBIZ OIL 10677 LENDN AVENflE UATE CRIN6 / Z]YCIDEMP AUGUST 20, 1988 PETTY THEFT SEPTEHBER 18, 1990 STOLEN VEHICLE SEFTEMBER 3, 1990 PETTY THEFT APRIL 18, 1989 PETTY TNE£T FEBRUARY 2, 1989 ROBBERY APRIL 8, 199A BOMB THREAT AUGUST 29, 1988 PETTY THEFT APRIL 2, 19911 ROBBERY FEBRUARY 26, 1991 ROBBERY JANUARY 1, 1991 PETTY THEFT DECEHBER 10, 1990 PETTY THEE'T DECEMBER 3, 1990 STOLEN VEHICLE NOVEhIDER 30, 1990 INCIDENT/HISC LAW INF CALL NOVEHBER 9, 1990 PETTY THEFT NOVEMBER 7, 1990 PETTY THEFT AUGUST 25, 1990 TAMPERWG WZTH VEHICLE AUGUST 12, 1988 CHILD ABUSE AUGUST 6, 1990 PETTY THEFT APRIL 23, 1988 PETTY THEFT AUGUST 15, 1990 PETTY THEFT AUGUST 29, 1989 FORGERY NOVE!®ER 21, 1991 FRAUDULENT USE OF ACCESS CARD ~ AUGUST 31, 1991 _. MARE/PASS FICTITIOUS CHECXS J JULY 21, 1991 - PETTY THEFT JUNE 23, 1991 PETTY THEFT _ MAY .31, 1991 _ PETTY THEFT HAY 18, 1991 PETTY THEFT NAY 5, 1991 _ _. DRIVWG UNDER THE INFLUENCE DECEMBER 28, 1988 ROBBERY N -. i, AUGUST i, 1988 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF ~ AUGUST 26, 1988 PETTY THEFT ~~ l aqe o pages ~ Z~ NOBIL orz 9315 BASE LL16 RCND DA3$ (7t71rJS / I71C.LTIf4i7 DECEHBER 3, 1991 PETTY THEFT SLILY 25, 1991 NON-LYJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION APRIL, 4, t 991 NON-WJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION HARCH 21, 1991 INDECENT' EKP0.5URE NOVEAIDER 29, 1990 NON-INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION AUGUST 22, 1987 BURGLARY SEPTEMBER 29, 1990 HAXE/PASS FICTITIOUS CI~CKS JULY 10, 1990 PETTY THEFT JULY 14, 1990 PETTY THEFT APRIL 30, 1990 MALICIOUS HISCHIEE' MARCN 28, 1990 ROBBERY DECEMBER 22, 1989 PETTY THEFT DECF?IDER 18, 1989 BURGLARY OCTOBER 29, 1989 GRAND THEFT OCTOBER 14, 1989 PETTY THEFT SEPTEMBER 13, 1989 AHNOYIAG TELEPHONE CALLS NAY 19, 1989 NON-INJURY 1R9FFIC COLLISION DECEFIBER 13, 1988 ANNOYING TELEPHONE CALLS DECEMBER 11, 1988 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON HOVFd1BEF 1, 1988 &1TTERY JULY 29, 1988 ACCIDENT N/lIINOR ZNJURI68 JULY 3, 1988 PETTY THEFT' JUNE 11, 1988 PETTY THEFT NAY 11, 1988 ASSIST OTHIER DEPARTd~M!' OCTOBER 25, 1987 PETTY THEFT SEPTEf43ER 22, 1987 ° LILT WITH DEADLY WFIPON ~ 2~ Page 8 of 8 pages RESOLUTION N0. ~a' ~,./~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING CONG IT IONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-20, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A GAS STATION, MTNZ-MARKET, AND CAR WASH ON A 1.31 ACRE PARCEL IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATZ ON (R-14 DWELLING :H::TE PER ACRE) OF TH F. TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTIR]E ST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-151- 17. A. Recitals. (i) Shell Oil Company has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-20 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to act "the application." (ii) On Oceober 9, 1991, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said pssblic hearing to allow the development plans to be resubmitted to the Design Review Committee. (iii) On the 17th day of December 1991, the Planning Conanission of the City of Ranchq Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to January B, 1992. (iv) On the 8th day of January 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heating on the application and concluded said hearlnq on that date. The Planning Commission directed that a Resolution of Denial be prepared for the Janusz 22, 1992, meeting. (v) On the 22nd day of January 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Re so lutlon No. 92-10 thereby denying, based on certain facts and findings, the application. (vi) The applicant subsequently filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision with the City Clerk wlthln the time iimita prescribed by law. (vil) On the 4th day of March 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearlnq and concluded said hearing on that date. (viii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. e. Recto lotion. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby Pound, date rml ned, and resolved by the City Cnuncil of the CSty of Rancho Cucamonga act follows: ~ 2Z CITY COUtIC IL RESOLUTION NO. COP 91-2C - SHELL OIL COMPANY March 24, 1992 Page 2 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Hased upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on March 4, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, togs they with public testimony, this Council hereby spa cifical ly finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Hase Line Road and Ro cheater Avenue with a street frontage of 250 feet along Base Line Aoad and 17d feet along Rochester Avenue. The parcel is presently vacant; and (b) The properties to the north and east are zoned for and being developed with single-family residences. The properties to the scuth and west are zoned for my It i-family uni to ana are vacant; and (c) Under the Terra Vista Community Plan, service stations and related uses (mini-market and car wash) are defined as "Community Facilities" and are permitted in any zoning des ignation along the major arterials (Hase Line, Milliken, or Rochester) subject to review and approval of a Conditional Uae Permit; and (d) The application contemplates the 24-hour operation of a gas station, mini-market, and car wash; and (e) Under the Terra Vista Community Plan, an adequate separation shall be provided between a service station and residential areas in the form of a street, adds [ional landscape setback, or other "buffer" of non-residential use eaCi sfactozy to the planning Commission or City Council upon appeal. As proposed, insufficient buffering exists to adequately mi tigers the impacts of the proposed operation on the adjoining residentially zoned areas; and (F) Under the Terra Vista Community Plan, the appropriateness o£ the locations of service stations, including car washes and convenience retail (mini-marts), shall 'lx de temiined by the Planning Commission, or city Council upon appeal, during the Conditional Uae Permit process; and (q) The proposed 24-hour-a-day operation of the gas station, car Wash, and mini-market will result in excessive vehicular traffic, vehicles left. running, radios playing, etc•, creating excessive not se, air eml ssicns, and an intenai ty of use which is incompatible with the residential area. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Counctl during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings cf facts set forth in paragr aphe 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows; L.1 CSTY COVNCSL RESOLUTSON NO• CIJP 91-20 - SHELL OTL COMPANY March 24, 1992 Page 3 (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the -evelopment Code, and the puryoses of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use wilt be detrimental to the public has lth, safety, or welfare or matezially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 9~ Hased upon the Findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the application. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to She11 Oil Company that the t+.me within which judicial review of the decision zePresented by this Res elution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 5. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: la) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, aad (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Reso lot ion, by certified mail, return-receip[ requested, to Shell Oil Company at the addr¢se identified in City zecords. 12~{ CITY OF R~1tiCH0 CCCANOIvGA '... STAFF REPORT '~ .r-, ~ GATE: March 4, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ! Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager I FROM: William J- O'Neil, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate Engineer ~~I SUBJECT: EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-NAY FOR LARK OR IVE FROM ITS EXISTING EASTERLY TERMINUS TO ROCHESTER AVENUE. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to proceed with condemnation of Right-of-Nay for the construction of street improvements for the Lark Drive from its exl5ting easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue at the property commonly known by Assessors Parcel Number 227-011-13 (a vacant lot) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This is an Eminent Domain action to acquire Right-of-Way for Lark Drive. The projects limits are from the existing easterly terminus of Lark Drive to Rochester Avenue. This street is needed prior to the opening of the new High School on the south side of Lark Drive. The property owner of the parcel in question, APN 227-011-13 has been contacted personally by staff and sent a written offer based on the Independent appraiser valuation. To date the owners have not responded to the latest offer. Although open negotiations remain available, 1t is felt necessary due to time constraints to have the street constructed prior to school opening Tn September, to enact a Resolution of Necessity to proceed with condemnation of such Right-of-Way for the construction of Lark Drive. It 7s requested that Council direct the City Attorney to obtain a 3 day order of possession to insure construction completion in a timely manner. Respectfully submit~ed~ William J. O'Neil ,~~y~G~ City Engineer ~ WJO:JLM:Iy /~ Attachments RESOLUTION N0. `7~' ~ CJ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga by mutual 3 party agreement with The William Lyon Company (TWLC) and Chaffey Nigh School District was pursuing the acquisition of Right-of-Way for Lark Drive, the location commonly known by APN 227-011-13 (a vacant lot). TWLC attempted to negotiate with owners to purchase the necessary rights-of-Way but was unable to acquire same. (ti) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 40404(a), a City may acquire private property by condemnation when it is necessary for establishing, laying out, extending and widening streets; (iii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 7267.2, prior to adopting this Resolution, the CT ty has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as established by independent appraisal valuation; (iv) On March 4, 1992, this Council held a duly noticed hearing pursuant to the terms of California Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1245.235, and said hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; (v) This project has been environmentally revf ewed through the Circulation element of the Victoria Planned Comnuni ty and approved by City Ordinance No. 143. No charges to the project area have occurred, and it is found no additional Environmental Revtew is necessary; and 8. Resolution NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A-1 thru A-6, oft s esn u inn. SECTION 2: That portion of the property which is required for a Right-of-Way for s ree mprovement purposes referenced herein is situated in Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in Lhe legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by thts reference. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council durin~ g t e eve-referenced public hearing, including wr7tten staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: ZED RESOLUTION - LARK DRIVE MARCH 4, 1992 PAGE 2 a. The public interest and necessity requT red the proposed project; b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c. The property defined in this Resolution is necessary for the proposed project; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real property pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Sec Lion 7267.2. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby declares its Intention to acquire the proper y escr bed in Section 2, above, by proceedings in Eminent Domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, Tn the name of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning for street improvement purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the provisions of lax applicable thereto. The City Attorney Ts authorized and instructed to make applications to said Court for an order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of ayor I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, Ctty Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution as Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1942 and was finally passed at a regular mee ng o he City ounc o e ty of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1992, by the following vote; AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: e ra ams, y er City of Rancho Cucamonga ~Z~ EYFfI©IT A-1 nELOnwna LF W e$m ev City of Rurcho Cuumonp NNIN P[COAOFU YrV l i0 Cily of Rancho Cucemon{[ F.O. Bor 80T Rulrho Cucunonga, CA 91])B OACl An0Vf 1NO LIN[ECn n[COIIOG'E UEE EASEMENT FUR A VALUABLE CUNSIDERATIUN, roc:ipl of which u h<Rey aknowl<decb b1NET CAT£ LAO ER, Tmaree of [he Cher len H. Lauer Trm[ undo[ Perlmat loo of irasE JateJ December 1). 1984, and !WICELLf. BAUEP, Trmtee of the !InrcellP Pmer Trust under Pec loco[ loo of Trua Jottd May IB, 190) GRAM(S) to the City of Rancho Cu<emonge, • Municipd Carpoution, an EASEpIENT far Sr reef, hlglrvay and related purpoaea. in, m'tr and u; on Ihel crnain re.U property in the Cily of Rancho Cucamonp, County o(San Bemudino, Swle of CaliforNa, Demnbtd ss Follows: BEF. ATTALIIEO ESIIIBIiS Doled __ _ _.--__-_ - OENERAL AGKNOWLEOOMENT SIFIe of Gavnly of on mra the _ e.rm-_--__-- ss ine und<r)ipned Noln[ OvGb6 oenomlly [o0evad 11 Oerfon[IIY Anown In ma I' em.ne ro m.n^rne eas•n of sauamnorr eaaence m e. me oeraom+l.ane. nam.ul __ mbsoreae to ten wnnm maNam.~l one ersnawreepee mu e.e<weml WIINEBB mr n+^d and olootl neat Nolnv a fr9narme 19 _, btlore me, TI115 IG A r{f.NCPLL PCPNCNL[GGCN[NL PL[AS[ USE PPOPF.P ACP xOXLECGEn LNT. L L. PAPTNF.PVIIIp, COPPOMTE, EiC. exniair a-z Letel orcrlpd on for St[eet HlfiMey .M Releaed Purpasee LerR ~0 rive ced SceteO to Tha Clty of Rancho cuceaonge Those portlone of the Nestarly 1/1 a( the Northwest 1/e o[ the Northeast 1/~, Sectlon ]1, TIN, RfiN, Sen se[nerdlno Base Meridian, in the County of San Be me rdino, State of Cell[urnie, according to the Unltea Ste tau coverneent Township plat approved by the Surveyor General doted Novesber 11, 1005, ae shown on the Pecord of Survey recorded in Book A7, Pege 72, records In the office o[ the County Recorder, o[ the County of Sen Berne rd loo, descrl bed ea follcus: Parcel 1 The Southerly 52.00 [eat thereof. Parcel 3 BRGIMNI MC et the Nottheeet corner of the e0ove descrl bed Pe reel 1: TN®IC6 Nestarly along the Northerly line o[ geld parcel 1 a distance of 110.9e [eat to a polo[ on a tangent curve coneeve Northerly he wing a radius o[ 170.00 feet; TNffiIC6 easterly along sold curve N[ough a centre] engla oC 09 degrees Be etnutee o7 seconds an ere dintence o[ 50.56 Eeet to a point one rove tse tangent curve coneeve Southerly he vi nq a radlue of 1)0.00 fee[, a radial t0 eald reveres [engent curve through sold point beers 5 00 degrees 50 einutes 22 seconds 8: T88NC8 8esterly along said curve through a central angle 09 degrees Ot einutes 07 seconds en ere die [once oC 68.06 feel toe polo[ on s tangent line drown pe rellel to end 10.00 feet Northerly e¢e su red et right e ogles a[ sold NorNerly line of said Pe reel 1; TBBMCB P.eate rly along es ld line a dletence o[ 1.s7 feet to a polo[ on the eeete rly line of se ld Nest ]/1, Northwest 1/e, Northeast 1/1, Sectlop ]1, TIN, R6M1 7718NC6 SoukheNy along ra la 8esterly line a ale [once oC IO.ao feet to the POINT or BBCINNINO. App(oxleete Area Parcel 1: 17,311 A egeere [ht, O.eO acres Peccel 3: 695.0 eque[a feet, O.OI acres E%HIBii N-3 00 of ___~ ~s s~ i'_' a r~~ .',: L1 ltl 111 ~ L.l /_ Y i. W _,~ ~w y w a Y o j1~ ~\ \ £I • \ \i 1\ ~w~ u\j ¢ { ~` i~ °i _~ ~~ ~ ~ Y j .oo oC\~~oOJ21 rz a°- a ~- ~a o~ U V V N aw o° FJ a° a~ ~J W J W 0 V1 0° a ^°° °m ~ ads ads o© o EXI{I BIT A-4 [.eyel Deecrl ptlon Poi Street flighvey eiM Related Yurposee on LerR Driva Oedlceted to The Clty of Rancho Cuce>to~ge That portion of the Rea terly 1/3 of the Xeste[ly 1/2 of the Northwe¢t 1/t of the Nor Neest ]/a o[ Section Jl, T1N, R6x, Sen Bernnra ino Be ae entl Meridian, 1n the County of Sen Bernardino, State o[ Celifarn te, eccardl nq to the United States Goverment Tomship plot approved Dy the surveyor General datetl Noveadxfr 3J, 1885 ee shorn on the Record of Surv¢y recorded In Bovk ~9, Pege 72, records 1n the of[lce of the county Recorder o[ the County o[ Sen Bernerdlnv, tlescri bed ea [ollowe: Tha Southerly 62.00 teat thereo (. Approxlrete area: 30,530.2 square [eat o.~~ scree e EXHIBIT A-5 F/:' _- N u° wg TJ ~1 ¢3 L- L) ~ L~ tit ~~1 ~9 ~~ 1 ~ ~N l~~ 4 3 2 Y e 4 W u l w (] _ Y Q J ~' 2 Z a O ar Ea o~ u~ u aw o° rJ as a" IJ CITY OF RAVCHO CUCAb10NGA STAFF REPORT '' r,- DATE: March 4, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR LARK DRIVE FROM ITS EXISTING EASTERLY TERMINUS TO ROCHESTER AVENUE AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE AECOMIENDATIpI Staff recormends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to proceed with condemnation of Right-of-Nay for the construction of street Improvements for the Lark Drive from Its existing easterly terminus to Rochester Avenue and the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue at the property located at 18811 Highland Avenue (APN 227-011-09) in the C1 ty of Rancho Cucamonga. This is an Eminent Domain action to acquire R1 ght-af-Way for Lark Drive. The limits are from the existing easterly terminus of Lark Drive to Rochester Avenue. This street is needed prior to the opening of the new High School on the south side of Lark Drive. The second portion of the sub,{ect property is for the installation of a signal and full intersection widening for Highland Avenue at Rochester Avenue. This is needed to handle the traffic generated by the new school. The property owner of the parcel in question, APN 227-011-09 has been contacted personally by staff to discuss the protect. As of this date, negotiations have resulted in an impasse. There is no "middle ground" acceptable to the owner. The owner was offered the opportunity to present viable information to the Appraiser for possible reevaluations. The conclusion of the meeting found the owner presenting 2 year old offers on the property and personal opinions on valuation of the land. Since this information is Inconclusive and unsubstantiated the appraisal must remain unchanged, This is unacceptable to the owner and results in the request for Eminent Domain. Mr. De Vito requested, by letter dateA February 28, 1992, the Eminent Domain hearing be continued for two weeks. Mr. DeV/to was contacted upon CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-NAY FOR LAAK DRIVE TO ROCHESTER AVENUE MARCH 4, 1992 PAGE 2 receipt of the letter by the City on February 26, 1992. He was informed that the City could not delay the hearing date of March 4, 1992, since prior commitments have been made to Chaffey School Dt strut regarding the construction of certain improvements adjacent to the school. However, Mr. De V1 to was told that City staff would be willing to meet with him anytime before or after the hearing. Although open negotiations remain available, it is felt necessary, due to time constraints to have the street constructed prior to school opening in September, to enact a Resol utlon of Necessity to proceed with condemnation of such Right-of-Nay for the construction of lark Drive. it is requested that Council direct the City Attorney to obtain a 3-day order of possession to insure construction completion in a timely manner. Respectfully submltteQ, `~ ~ ~~--C ~/ Nilliam J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:JLM:Iy Attachments ~a4 RESOLUTION N0. %a-()~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals (1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga by a mutual 3 party agreement with The William Lyon Company (TNLC) and Chaffey High School District was pursuing the acquisition of Right-of-Way for Lark Drive at APN 227-011-09 commonly known by the Street address 18811 Highland Avenue. TWLC attempted to negotiate with owners to purchase the necessary rights-of-Way but was unable to acquire same, further the C7ty by the same agreement attempted to obtain street Right-of-way for widening the intersection of Highland and Rochester Avenues for a signal but could not reach a negotiated settlement. (ii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 40404(a), a City may acquire private properties by condemnation when it is necessary for establishing, laying out, extending and widening streets; (iii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 7267.2, prior to adapting this Resolution, the City has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire the properties for the full amount of fair market value as established by independent appraisal valuation; (iv) On March 4, 1992, this Council held a duly noticed hearing pursuant to the terms of California Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1245.235, and said hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; (v) This project has been environmentally reviewed through the Circulation element of the Victoria Planned Community and approved by City Ordinance No. 143 and City Resolution 91-321. No changes to the project area have occurred, and it is found no additional Environment Review is necessary; and B. Resolution NOW THEREFORE, it 1s hereby found, dete nnl ned and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A-1 thru A-6, of [Fiis~Teso titian. SECTION 2: That portion of the properties which are required for a Righ -o~f~l- ay-for street improvement purposes referenced herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in the legal descriptions and maps attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. ~3y RESOLUTION -LARK DRIYE MARCH 4, 1992 PAGE 2 SECTIDN 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during~e move-referenced public hearing, including written staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: a. The public interest and necessity required the proposed project; b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and Lhe least private injury; c. The property defined in this Resolution is necessary for the proposed project; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real property pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Section 7267.2. SECTIDN 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire the propert- e~~ri bed in Section 2, above, by proceedings in Eminent Domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action Tn the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the properties described herein for the purpose of condemning for street improvement purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make appl lcatlons to said Court for an order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be dl rected by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real properties for the uses and purposes herein described. SECTIDN 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of ayor I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution as Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City ~of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1992 and was finally passed at a regular mee ng o he City ounc o e ty of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1992, by the following vote; AYES: COUNCIL MEhIBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MENDERS: ATTEST: e ra ams, ty er 3 (P City of Rancho Cucamonga /e xlGNUxD B apr~T~Ea E%H IBIT '^' A[COpNMO L[W flI [L ry, Cilr of R•ncho Numoo[A wxex ^ewAp[o [wL To Cilr o(R•ncha CLClmoll/! P.O. Bap AOI R[ncho Cuc[mOnp, G 911]0 w J µ'I EXHIBIT A-I VAC[NOVI iNI[UMI LOp p[COpON'[V[! EASEDIENT APx 22)-DI]-p9 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDEMTION, nalpl of .N<h a hacbr ahnowlcdµd, NICK OEVITO INC.. A LAL IF GANIA L00.PpUTION GRANilS) to the Cily o! R4r~~1~oECS. NlGlal'Ar[s^Nlo`dEE^iEtl DURPOSE$ ~~ENT faY In, nrcr •nd oFOn IA•t cal•in rN propcrV N Ne Cilr of R[ncho Cuumonp. County of 5•n Bcrnudinv, Su¢ o! UIIlomi•, D<sribcd u Fellow<: THOSE ppAT IONS OF THE EASTER IT 1/2 OF THE NOP TH4E ST 1/4 OF iNE Np1 TNEAS7 1/4 OL SECTION 3l, TIN, R64, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AXp MERIDIAN IN THE COUNTY OF SAN B ERNAADINO, STAE OF [AU FOANIA, ALLOAO ING iC THE UNItEO STATES GOVEANHE Ni TONNSIIIP PLAT APPAOVCO BY, THE SURYE/0R GENERAL, OATEO NOYE ND FR ID, 1885, AS SNOMN ON TXE AEC00.0 OF SURVEY RECORDED IN BOOK 41, PAGE ]2, RECOA OS IN THE OFFICE OF 1NE COUNTY RECORDER, OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNA0.01N0, DESCRIBED AS FOLLONS: BEGINNING Ai iNE INTERSECTION NI iN TIIE NEST LINE OF ROf llf SiTR AY[NVE. A 60~FfgT XIOF. $t~E'T AND THE SOUTH LINE OF HIGHLAND AYCNUE, A 66-FOOT HIDE SBEE I, 111E NCE NUR iH B9 76'09" NEST ALONG THE $OViNERIl LINE OF HI GNUND AVENUE 40.09 FEET, THENCE SOUTHERLY 13.00 FEET ALONG A LINE PERPENOICUTAR NI7N RND MEASURED Ai AIGNT ANGLES NIiH iNE S4ID SOUTHERLI LINE OF NIGHlANO AVENUE TO iNE BE GIHNI HC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOU TN4E 57 HAYING A RADIUS OF 2L 00 FEET, SA10 BEGINNING OF CVR YE IS TANGENT i0 A LINE OAANN PARALLEL MIiH ANp IT.00 FECT SOWX MEASURCO AT RIGHT ANGlFS OF THE SOU iN LINE OF NI GIIL ANO AYE XUE, THE NCE $OUTNEAGtEALT )2.91 FEET QONCr SA10 CUR YE i0 A RAO IAL UNE OF SAID CVA YE, SAIp R4DIAl UNE IS PEPP CfI01CUlAR N71H AHO MEASUR EO Ai AIGN7 ANGLES NITH iNE NES7E0.lY LINE OF ROCHESTER AYE NUE, THENCE 20.00 FEE6 ALONG $A ID AADIAI LINE TO 7NE NES TEALT LINE OF gOCNES TFA AVENUE, THENCE NOR iH 0 Il'20" EAST )7.05 FEET ALONG SAID NFSIERLT LINE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE i0 THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 10AJ.)4 SOUAAE FEET HOAE OR LEBS. AITACNEp HERETO AND MADE A PART OF THE LEGAL OESLR (PiION I$ A PUT IABLEp 'EANIB Ii B'. DNed _ OEN EpAL ACKNOWlE00MENT 51•b 41 l On lpb ln.__eq el IY, ,O[bn m•, J1 " . G4Vn1Y 41 -- ' In• and•ulpnM Nal•ry puEl¢, p[rmn•IIY •pp[[hd I] per.o"NIY .eennla m• n p •.ma m.e, m•LUOmYUI•I•u4i. •.m•nc• m 0•m•p•He"bl wnmevwl.l VO¢n0[e lalM muam•m.."e •c n~eama[e mn •u<NI•e n. WIf NE53 mY MnO mdoll¢bl Vtl N41•p f S~pe•lul• i N15 IS A f.L U[pAL ACpNONL[OL NIL Ni. LLLA$L 115L LLOp[p ACLNOXLLaG I.MLNT, Z.L. pAp TNLp SX Ip, COppCM: L, LiC. ex.Hlslr a-2 _ ~~{IGHLAND AVENUE _ N 89' 36' 09' W C URV't DATA: G = 89°47'37" R = 21.00' LC = 32 91' E; H/w w z ~u aN ¢. w~ ~~ NI o =z 0 20' PROPOSED R/W 30, t. NIA w 3 I N ~ ~ DENOTES AREA OF EASEMEN?= N.T.S. 1043 34 SQUARE FEEPr LC =32.91' ~ n ,~P 2 40 89' P.0.8. _~ r l~- ;AREA=104334'1 N m M ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP -EXHIBIT "B" ~ VESTEE: NICK DEVITO, INC. ~ APN 227-011-09 ~nnTr 1°'7~1''-'-{ cuo ,. r , ncr , E%HI BITS A-3 71105E PORTIONS OF TIIE EASTERLY l/2 OF THE NORTIINEST 1/4 ~OF TIIE NORTIIEASi 1/4 OF SECTION 3i, T1N, IIGW, SAN DERNA!iU 1N0 MSE AIJU F1F.RIUTAN IIJ Tllf. C1111NfY OP SAN UERNAl1U1N0, SfAIE OF GAL IFOfUJfA, ACC UItUIIJG TU TIIE UNIIEU SiAIES GUVEItNNf.NT TOIJNSIIIP PLAT APPROVED DY TIIE SURyEYOR GENERAL, DATED IJOVEFiOfR 13, IBB5, AS SIIUWN OIJ TIIF. RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED IU BOOK 47, PAGE 72, RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, OF TIIE COUNTY OF SAN DERNARUINO, UESCRIOEU AS FOLLONS: DEGINFJIIJG AT TIIE INTERSECTI011 WITH TIIE WEST LINE OF ROCHESTER AVERiIE, A GO-FOOT WIUE STREET ANO TIIE SOUTH LINE OF HIGIILARO AYE NUE, A 66-FOOT NIUE STREET, TIIENCE pURTII 89 36'09" WEST ALONG TIIE SOUTREIiLY LINE OF IIIGIILMJU AVENUE 40.09 FEET, 111ENCE SOUTHERLY 13.00 FEET ALOIJG A LIRE PERPEIJDICULAR H1TH AHU IdEA$URED AT RIGHT ANGLES WITH THE SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF HIGIILAIID AVEIIUE TO TIIE BEGINIJIHG OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO TIIE SOUTHWEST HAYRJG A RADIUS OF 21.00 FEET. SAID DEf,INIJIIJG OF CURVE IS TANGENT TO A LINE URAWN PAIIALLEL WITH AIIU I3.VU FEET SUUTII 11EASUREl1 AT Riflli ANGLES OF 111E SOUTH L[NE OF HIGIILAIJO AVENUE, TIIEHC6 SOUTHEASTERLY 32.91 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE TO A RADIAL LINE OF snto CURVE, SAID RAUfAL LIRE 1S PfRPENUICULAR WITH AIJU FIEASUREU AT RIGHT AIJGLES WITH TIIE WESTERLY LINE OF ROCIIESiER AVENUE, TIIENCE 20.00 FEETO ALONG SAID RnUTAL LINE TO TIIE WESTERLY LINE OF ROCHESTER AVEIIUE, TIIEIJCE IJURTII 0 11'26" EAST 33.85 FEET ALONG SAID NESTERLY LIME OF ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 711E POIIJT OF OEGINNING. CONTAINING 1043.34 SgUARE FEET FIORE OR LESS. ATTACHED HERETO AIJU PUIUE A PART OF TIIE LEGAL UESCRIPiION IS A PLAT LA6LEU "EXHIBIT B". ~3~ Cily of Rpncho Cucuvonp xxex ucanoro x,uL ro City of 0.encho Nravnonae P.O. B^R g07 RAnchv Cucwonae, CA 91)10 EXh 161T AL~ trACL Atove rnu uxe roP Pewnoulutt EASEMENT F00. A VALUAtlLE CGNSIDERATIGN, rtL<ip1 of which is Arr<by ¢knowicd{td, NICK UEVLTD 19C., a Callfornle Corpvntion GRANT(S) to the City v/ Rancho CucemonP, • Municiptl Corporation, en EASEMENT for gtree c, hSghvay end related purpoeo In, aver end upon That ccnvn rcpt proRtlY in the City of Rsncho Cucemonp, County of $en Bernardino, Slxtt of CaGfdrtda, [ascribed u Followr: SEE Ai'iACHEp EXIIt BITS UPltd ______ GENERAL ACKNO WLEDOMENT Stele of ___~ onIn411rt_epv of _ 19_.Mlon me, ss cwmy of Ina urMenipned NoRrY pum¢, pueontlly aovaued II Psyon+IlY+^o»~lo me C! Orored l0 me on meLMO Or Rall+bclary eadente w be meomonpl»no+e mmel+I _ evxecnbedmine wunm mrNUmenl, and ¢Fnowleedetl lMl aacWad ll W IINEEg ml Aand and oll¢ul Beal rioury ~ Sr9n~lvrs T1115 IS A (.SNFPAL ACANDNLLOLCXLNT. PLEAS[ OSL YPOp gP ACRHONLLCGLNp NT, LL. GAp TNF.PSN[p~ COppOpATL~ETC. Ek'~ilulr r- l,egnl Oencrlpcion Poi Street H1g0Yey end Related Purposes on Lerk Drive [Md)cetal :n tLa City o[ rtencLO Cuceforge Twee fwrr.fom of tM Mrtedy 1/2 of [ha Nnrt Mea 1/4 of :he Narcheeec 1/4 a[ Sac[ian Jl, TIti, 0.6V, 5•n 6ernnrd l,w Mee eri Nrrt Alnn, to [he Cou~[y o[ Snn Mrn•rdtw, St•te of tilt(ornJa. ortllry{ to tM Unl [ed ct•cee Coverrmnc Twnehlp pL0 appravM Yp the Surveyo[ Cene[al, deed Novevl.er 13, 1F85, a nhnm n the Recent a[ sureey octled in Nock 4). Fe6e ]2, r corAn to the aL [ICe•of [M Cowty Reco[dnf. of [he Cmm[y o[ 5•n Mrn•rd1m, desca bed a fol loa: Pa[<et 'A• Tr lout MriT 52.00 fees tbeeeo[. Parc•1 'e• NNCtN111NC on the Noahveet corner of tlw southerly 51.00 feat of eeld Pvec 1/2, Nor[beet 1/4, Noaheu[ 1/6, Seetlon ]l, TIN, R6V; T19CR NNrtlwrly elo~ the M•[erly 11 tw of said Rn•[ 1/2, NNrtfnert 1/4, Northee•t 1/4, Recclon 3l, TIN, R6Y, a dlrtewe o[ 10.00 (see to • polne o e llna dram prdlel d[h aed 10.00 Eea Nor[h ro cared •c r1aN[ •t~i•• of tM Herthedy line of said savcherly 52.00 [eer, Tm9ee •Nea[arly datg uld feral lal llm • dbunce of 215.86 face co a pone o • utyent • SnutkrlT Mv1.Nt • redlue of 430.W feet; T1INICE R.aerb dv~ uldt~urw throu6h • mtral •t~51• of 09 Ae6reea 06 vtnutea 01 coM• m dl•[~we •[ 60.06 [set [o • point o tensent curve e Nor[neuT h.aty . r.alY. et ;Ia.oo tea.. r.atn oe .em Uryfenc n.eree v thrvtµh u1d polo[ beac• 5 09 d<kreee A] •Imrtea 53 aecotNe Y; PIIBICIC Re•ur11 •1 otY; .efd eurv thro,gh a central ary}. of G9 de5reu 06 .ttvtea o] catd• m erc dleutr.• o[ 51.56 [set to a point o acid NOrtherlT 11tw of ee ld RoutMdy 52.00 [oet of tM e.ac 1/2, Marchese[ 1/4, Nocthen et 1/4, sect 4on 31, iiN, R6Y; T(Att! Ye•c•dT alorg utd ane . Ala•we of 341.96 [ee[ [o the Pofm OP E601fq[N0, App[ealaa[a Aru Pamet A: 34,420.1 .guar. [at, 0.19 scan Pnc•1 e: 2,1104.9 aq r. [cat, 0.06 aces ~1 L7 L ~~~ Lit ill ` Yt~ Z Y ~~ LEI .', wy w~ e a s x 7-- - ~ b y' ~ a a~ ~; ~ fa }_ a~ s V U _ U N s aW O ~ ti J as a~ E. q 2J cG3 I ~~ i W I J om _, K • \_ e` ~,- m ao of Ir o,~, a9 STAFF REPORT :°:°~'Y~'.-, :~ ,; . . ~-, . ~,_. DATE: February 27, 1992 ~ , r .l TO: Mayor and Members of the Ciry Gouncil FROM: Diane O'Neai, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT MOBILE HOME ACCORD Recommendation Approve the Mobile Home Accord contract and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract on behalf of the City. The Alta Laguna, Alta Vista, Casa Volante, Chaparral, Foothill, Ramona, and Sycamore Mobile Home Parks have agreed to sign an Accord. The Accord is signed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the owners and is attached for the City Council's rev'~ew. The attached Mobile Home Deal Point Memorandum dated February 18, 1992 highlights the protection provided in the Accord. The Accord was Federal Expressed to the owners Thursday, February 27, 1992 which means the document has been guaranteed to arrive on Friday, February 28, 1992 by 10:30 a.m. The owners have been asked to return the signed Accord by Federal Express so that the City will have original, signed documents by the Wednesday, March 4, 1992 City Council meeting. The Accord is structured to allow "counter part" original documents which means the owners do not all have to sign the same, original document. Respectfully Subm tted. , Diane O'Neal Management Analyst II F E R- 2 T- 9 2 T H U 9:? M fi R K. M r N N R R C Z 'i t{ S K I P 0 2~ 1 T AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY of RANCHO CCCAMONGA AND OWNEP,B OF CERTAIN MOBILE HOME PAA%8 WITHIN RANCHO CCCAMONOA YAOVIDIN3 FOR AN ANNtlAL MA%IHUM RENT ADJUSTMENT This Agreement, which shall be kn o:an as "IHE N.OBZLE HO:dE PARK ACCORD," is made and entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereinafter referred to as "City" and the o•dners of certain of the mobile home parks within the city, hereinafter individually and collectively referred to as "G::ner," is effective as of the 6th day of February, 1992, and provides as follows: W Z T N E 8 8 E T N: WHEREAS, there exists within the City and the surroundi ny areas a serious shortage of mobile home rental spaces, which has resulted in low vacancy rates and potential for rising space rents; and WHEREAS, because of the high ccst of moving mobile hones, the potential for damaye resulting therefrom, the requirements relating to the installation of nobile hones, including pern its, landscaping and site preparation, the lack of alternative home sites for mobile hose residences and the substantial Snvestment of r.,obile home owners in such Y.omes, there exists a shortage of nobile horee park spaces; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to protect the residonts of mobile hones from unreasonable space rent increases, while at the same tide recognizing the need for mobile hone park owners to recoive a just and reasonable income sufficient to cover the ccsts of repairs, maintenance, insurance, employee services, additional amenitl.es and other operations, as well as a juat and Yeasnnahle return on investment; and WHEREAS, it is commonly known that, after i.n itial installation, virtually all mobile homes are never thereafter ;,oved and when a resident decides to move, the mobile home is commonly sold in place and if rents are below free-market leveis, the possibility oxists Ghat a portio.^, of fhe mobile home space value m1gh Y. he t.ransPerced upon such sale unless rents are allowed to r].se upon such sale to leveis which are closer to or At free-market LP.ve].s; and WHEREAS, decisions of a rent stabilize t.fon board or s tr~~i:ar decision-Waking body may not necessar{ly fulfill the intent of p!~otecting mobile home residents from unreasonable space rent increases, nor cio such decisions aiway r. provide an owner with ten 14y PER - 2 7- 9 2 T H U 9: 5 9 M p R K M p N ~ p R C Z Y PI S K Z F 0 3 .' 1 T opportunity for a just and reasonable intone sufficient to operate a mobile home park, ar.d to galh a fair and reasons F,le return on investr.,ent; and WHEREAS, concerns among residents and owners of mobile }come parks over rent increases and cther park-related situations can often best be resolved between tare two parties, provided triere exists the incentive for both parties to negotiate in good faith and reach agreement; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this Accord to protect monde home park residents from unreasonable space rent adjustments and mobile home pare owners Prop infringement upon property rights; and wHEREA S, the Cicy Council has adopted Resolution tie. 3J2 which creates a residence committee in each of the eight mobile home parks, and which authorizes the Mayor to execute this Agreement on 6eh elf of the City; and WHEREAS, by mutual agreement, an Accord between the City and the Ownere l:ae been in existence from January 1, 1985 to the effective date of thin Agreement and said Accord has fulfilled :ts purpose by stabilizing roots during the period 1985-1992 and of yenerally ir.proving relations between residents and owners within the city. t10W, T7{ERE.FORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals arc incorpvrnted in this Agreement. 2. gonsideration. In consideration of Owner entering intc this Agreement, and owner keeping and performing all of the terms, covenants and conditions to be kept and performed by Owner, City agrees that during the term of this Agreement., provided the owner is not in breach of this Agreement, the City council of City shall not enact any ordinance, resolution, or other regulation which imposes restrictions upon or otherwise controls Ownar~s increase or decrease of mobile home space rents. 3. p~~_' 'ens. For purposes of this Ayreement the following words and phrases shall have the eeanings hereinafter stated: A. "Annual Rent Adjustment" shall mean the rent. adjust r.~snb made to the Base Rent not more frequently than cn cs every 365 days. B. "ftnse Reno" shall be that rent charyed by r,he r obile hone park as of December 31, 1991, and recalculated Thereafter each year according to any increase only for cha r.ryes ~4~` F E B- 2 T- 9 2 T N U 1 0: 0 0 M g R K M q N a g R C F 'ti N S K I P e 4% 1 in f.he Consumer Price Zrdex and shall not include any additional increases other than CPI except as provided in paragraph a hereof. C. °Capital Project" shall mean a project which includes the construction of (i) new improvements mandated by' a public entity for health or safety purposes or (ii) the replacement of old improvements in a mobile home park including, but not limited to, construction, installation or replacement of a clubhouse or portions thereof, common area facilities, swimming pool, sauna or hot tub, or other recreational amenities, streets and driveway<, security gates, outdoor or common area lighting, retaining walls, sewer, electrical, plumbing, water, or television reception systems, sprinkler systems, oY any similar improvement, capital projects are improvements defined herein which have a life expectancy of five (5) years or more, which are treated as Capital Improvements for Federal and State income tax purposes, •,.•h ich may not be deducted for such tax purposes as expenses and which have a minimum value of at least ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each project. Capital Projects do not include normal repairs or maintenance or insured repairs or replacements. Further, Capital Proi acts do not include im.prover.~ents required due to owner's failure to provide reasonable and sound maintenance of a facility or facilities. D. "consumer price Index" (CPI) shall mean the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI'U) as published for the Los Angeles~Anaheim-Riverside area 6y the U.S. Department of labor, Bu raa~a of Labor Stat iatfes. B. "Mobile Home" shall mean a structure designed for human habitation and for being moved on a street or highway under permit pu is uant to Section 35790 oP the California Vehicle Code. Mobile home includes a manufactured home, as def ined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code, and a mobile horns, as defined i» Section 18008 of the California Health and Safety Code, bat dues not include a recreational vehicle, as defined in Section 799.24 of the California Civil Code end Section 18010 of, the California Health and Safety Code or a commercial coach as defined in Section 1800)..6 of the California Health and Safety code, F. "Mobile Nome Park" shall mean any area of land within t:he <`tty where two or more mobile home spaces are rem r. eel, or held o'~lt. for ran Y., t.o accommodate mobile homes used for human habits lion, which is subject to the terms and provisions of t.h is Agreement. C. "Mobile Nome Space^ shall mean the site :oithin a nnbi le home park intended, designed, or used for the loco t,ion or accomm oriation of a mobile hcme and any accessory structw'ns or apps rtvnances attached thereto or used in conj uncY.ton t:he rewith, »h iyw F E H- 2 T- 9 2 T H U l a: 0 1 M pi R K' M A N .~ (+ R C Z Y N S K S P 0 5 i 1 T which is subject to the terms and provisions of this Agreement. H. "Owner" shall include the owner or operator of a mobile home park ar an agent or representative authorized to act on said owner's or operator's behalf in connection with the raintenance or operation of suoh park. .l. "Rent" shall mean the money paid in consideration cf the vse and occupdncy of a mobile home space, including services, amenities, and benefits in connection therewith. J. "Resident" shall mean any person entitled to occupy a mobile home dwelling unit pursuant to ownership thereof or rental yr lease arrangement with the owner of the subject dwelling unit, or as authorized pursuant to the Mobile Home Residency law. K. "Resident Committee" shall mean that five membor committee for each mobile home parK esta hlished by resolution of the City Council. L. "Voluntary Vacancy" shall mean any one of the £olioaing: a sale cr resale of a mobile home to a new resident(s); a removal of the mobile home from the space; ur a termination of tenancy pursuant to the Mobile Ffome Residency Law. A sale, resale or transfer of interest between members of the same immediate family (defined as the homeowner's legal spouse, the homeowner's legal parents or the homeowner's legal children) shall not constitute a voluntary vacancy under this provision. 4. TeYm. Thy term of this Agreement shall be deemed to have commenced Febr~,ry 6, 1992, and shall end at 11:59 p.m. on February 5, 1997, 5. Apnlicabil it~y. A. The provisions v£ this Agreement shall apply to all Mobile Home Parks and all idobile Hort.e Spaces owned by owner within Che City, except as provided in subparagraph B. 1l. This Agreement shall not apply to Mobile Homo Specea covered by leases at the effective date of this AgreemsnC, which provided for r.ore than month-to-month tenancy, but only for the duration of any such lease. Unon the explratton or other termination of any such lease, all provisions of this Agrees^.e nt shall tm:nediatvly be applicable to the Mobile Home Space, unless and until such space is again leased for more than a month-to-month tenancy. C. Ncne of the provisions cf this Ayreement shall yrec]ude a Resident from entering into a written lease with an Cwner. IN l ~t"1 F E H- 2 T- 9 2 T H U 1 0: 0 1 M g R K M q N .H g R C c `. N S K I P p 6- 3 T D. ocdner snail inform any prospective Resident of the applicability of this Agreement to the prospective~MObile }ions Space and shall supply a copy of this Agreement to such prospective Resident prior to executing a written lease •.rith such prospective Resident. 6. This Agreement shall not he effective for any purpose until it has been executed by duly authori2ed representatives of the Owners of all Mobile Home Parks which are sit gated in the City as of Pte r~ch 4, 1992 other than the Pines *tobile Home Park, F. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to impose any obliyatlon upon any owner with respect to a Mobile Florae Park not subject to such Owner's control. 6. ?fbile Home Park Registration. within sixty (60) days of written notice by the City Manager or hi3 designee, Own er shall be required to file with the City Manager or hts designee a Rent Registration Statement for each Mobile Home Space affected by thLs Agreement. The City Manager or his designee shall devise such reyistration forms so as to call Por information reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes and policies of this Agreement, and shall mail such forms to Gwner in sufficient time as to allow Owner to file their Registration Statements. The Rent Registration Statement shall be made part of this Agreement tFp on its filing. ~. Rar.t i~justment. A. At least sixty (60) days prLor to the effect ivo date of, a rental adjustment, owner shall serve all affected Residents, either personally or by mail, with notice of the proposed adjustm=rat in accordance with state law. Within five (5) days prior to any notice to Residents eP a rent adjustment, Uwner shall prcv ide the City Manager or his designee with the fol]owing information: (1) The effr-.ctive date of the noticed adjustment; (2) Identification of the Mobile Home Spaces affected: (3) The amount of the Rent prior t.o the eifectivc date of the notice for each of those Mobile Home Spaces; (4) The amount of the increase {in dollars) for each of those h!ohile Hems Spaces and f.he basis for the increase •.; ith e..'o pnorting data and calculations; (5) The identity of spaces under lease. ~U~ F E 8-2 T-92 THL~ 1 ka c 02 MH RK. Mp N a ,iRC Z `r'N SF; I F' OT ~ i T H. No adjustment to the Base Rent for a N.obila Ilome Space shall be noticed or permitted or enforced mere frequently than once every ]55 days, except as provided in paragraph 6 hereof. N.aximum Allot: able Adjustment to Rent.: (1) Owner shall be pe rr•.itted to increase rent as to a Mobile Home Space in excess of that which was lawfully charged during the previous year based upon all or any of the following bass: (a) Once each calendar year, Owner may adjusC the Base Rent in an amount not to exceed that amount derived by multiplying said Base Rent by one hundred percent ;1000 of the change of the CPI, as defined herein and as established by the City Manager. Said increase shall not be less than three percent (3$) of said Base Rent nor greater than nine percent (9~) thereof. (b) owner may be granted an increase Sn Rent spread across all Mobile Home Spaces in the Mobile Home park on a prorata basis in the event of an inccaase in the taxes (except any increase in property taxes due to a change in ownership), assess rents, or levies imposed upon the N,obile Home Park by local, state or federal government agencies. Owner shall so decrease Rent in said manner in the event of a decrease in such costs to Owner. Any such increase nay be made and any such decrease shall be made at the time when O•ener incurs rho same subject to notice requirements applicable thereto. (c) owner may be granted 2n increase Sn Rart in the event oP an increase in the amount charged to Owner for refuse collection, sewer, water, electric, gas and other public utility cervices. Owner may be granted said increase only for that increased arount charged which is greater than the charge effective as of the conclusion of the previous calendar year :.u ltiplied by the percentaye adjustment to rho Base Aent last calcula tad and allowed pursuant to subparagraph ~(c)(1)(a) hereof. Any such increase shall be cpread across a1.1 Mobile Home spa r.es in the Mobile Hone Park on a prorata basis. Owner shall docrease Rent. in an amount equivalent to the total decrease in such costs. Such decrease shall be spread across all Mobil r.-. Home :paces in '.he Mobile Hone Park on a prnrata ba:=is. Any such increase nay be r±ade and any such decrease shall he at the time when osrnsr incurs the sane subject to noClce requirements applicable thereto. The amount adjusted for refuse collection .or each space within a Mobile home Park shall not be greater than any adjustment for refuse collection made to residential unity, within the city. Hocumentatien substantiat.iny any such ad~liti onal increase or decrease must be sa r,m fitted to the City at. ~q iy F E R- 2 l' -? Z T H U 1 0 0 3 M q R K. M q N a g R C 2 `t N S Y.' I P 0 8 i 1 T least five (5) days before notice of such is Wade to any park resident. (d) Owner may be granted an increase in Rent spread across all tCObile Home Spaces in the Mobile Home Park on a prom ,a basis in the event a Capital Project, as defined herein, is made within the Mobile Home Park. The amount allowed as increased Rent shall be equal to fifty percent (50E) of the costs of the capital Project, including design, permits, constructior, and financing costs. The inc rease in Rent nay be made at the time when the Capital Project is completed as determined by final inspection of all governmental entities, if any, having jurisdiction over the capital Project, subject to notice requirements applicable thereto. Said increase in Rent shall be evenly spread over a period of time equivalent to either the internal Revenue Service amortization period applicable to the Capital Improvement or a shorter period agreed to by Owner and the Resident Committee in the subject Mobile Nome Park. In the event the Resident Committee asserts that no Rent increase based on the Capital Project should occur because the need for the same asseztedly was generated by Owners failure to provide reasonable and normal maintenance of a facility or facilities and Owner disputes said assertion, the dispute shall be submitted to binding arbitration pursuant to the applicable procedures of the American Arbitration Association. The determination made pursuant to such arbitration shall be binding, final and enforceable in the same manner as a final judgment of a court of law. The costa of such arbitration shell ba shared equally by the Owner and the Residents. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary stated herein, owner and the residents of a Mobile Home Park, by and through the Resident Committee, may enter into a written agreement providing for Owner installing a new amenity in such park in consideration of Owner being enabled to recover all or a portion of the costs thereof by way of increases to Rent charged prorate to all D'obile Home Spaces within sur.h park. Owner and the Rosidents of a t,obile Home Park, by and through the Resident committee, shall in good fatth negotiate the sharing of costs of repair lny or replacing facilities incurred due r.o any acts Of God. (2) Annually, beginning on the eLfecT.lve date of t.h is Agreement, the City Manager rr his designee shall determine the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index which shall he use] to calculate rent adjustments allotaed for all applicable mohilca home spaces. Said percentage CPI shall be calculated by dividing the sun of all monthly CPI pe rcanY. aye changes during thu previa,ts year by twelve, beryinnity with CPI released in the previous to the ru rrent; year and ending t!ith the Cpl roles sod in U I;U FEH-~~-92 THU 1hJ F]3 MgRKMgN ~ NRCZYFI '=k:I P0a,~1T I tloaenber of the immediately previous year. .he City Manager or his designee, upon request, shall notify an owner of such allowable Consumer Price Index. D. In the event an Owner attempts to increase without. coplying with the provisions of this Agreement, such an increase shall be deemed null and void, and Residents shall not be required to pay such increase. E. In the event the park Resident Committee questions the validity of a request to Sncrease or decrease Rent, said ccmnittee niy request City to review said request. Owner ag reas to mee*. with City and Resident Committee, and shall provide documentation explaining the validity of any such request as provided herein. Said increase shall not be valid until approved in witiny by the City Manager or his designee to be in corpliance with thle Agreement. 8. Volunta rv Vacancies. In addition to any other adjustments to Pent allowed under paragraph 7(C) hereof, and notwithstanding the limitation providing for only one rental adjustment per year to the Base Rent pursuant to Paragraph 7(B), O•aner shall be permitted to increase the Base Rent applicable to a Mobile Home Space upon a voluntary vacancy of the space by an ar.ount not greater than to fifteen percent (15$) of the Base Rent for t.ha [dobile Home Space applicable at the time of the volu r.t ary vacancy. The Base Rent on a particular N.obile Hone Space shall not be increased due to a voluntary vacar•,cy more frequently than once in any thirty-six (36) mcnth period. 9• R.i.SGKgt1Vn ~ wer Adiustment s. Nothing in this Agreement aha11 be construed as requiring an Owner to adjust Rents each year or as preventing an Owner from adjusting Rent to levels less than those herein allowed. Further, Owner shall give good faith consideration to a Residents request to be retie veal from an increase in Rent allowable hereunder due to that Resident's suffering substantial economic hardship. 1.0. Responsibilities of Owner. A. Owner agrees that during the term of this Ayreamer~t Owner shall furnish all of the facilities and utt]itios listod on Exhibit "A" hereto to all Residents at no extra chargo. Os:ner also agrees to provide and maintain in satisfactory working order and condition, during the tern, of this Agreement, all physical improvements and common facilities and arras ~./ithin the Mobile Home Park which are listed nn Exhibit "A" hereto. Owner shall also cort~ply with all requirements set furth in the Pfobile Ho r.e Res ider.cy Law. t7otwithstandiny the foreyninq, with tho consent of City, owner may reduce ox eliminate a eerv ir~r, within the ,tebile Hone Park or to eny Resident which dons not alYeet the health, safety and welfare oP any Resident, prcvlded +g~ 0 S'~ F ES-~ T-92 T HU 1 0_ 04 MNRF' Mi-~N a gr.'CZ l'PIS K, I F 10 . 1 T that a proportionate share of the cost savings resultiny from such reduction or elir,ination is passed on to the Residents in the fore of a decrease in Rent, If a Mobile Home Park owner who provides utility services, reduces or eliminates such sets ice by separate r..e taring or other lawful means of transferring to the Resident, the obligation for payment for such services, the cost savings shall be deemed to be the cost of such transferred utility service for the twelve(12) months prior to the installation and use of the cetzring system reasonably apportioned to excl adz common area costs. ['or tits purposes of this section ir. determining cost savinys to be passed on to the residr_nt in the form of decreased Rent, the cost o£ installation of separate utility meters, or similar costa to Diobile Hone Park owner to shift the obligation per payment oP utility costs to the Resident, shall not be considered. B. The Owner shall meet upon reasonable notice with the Resident Committee recognized by resoluCion of the City Council or as required by the Mobile Home Residency Law. There shall be a minimum of one meeting per year to discuss general park welfare, or City and Community items of importance. The Owner or his authorized representative shall also meet with the Resident Committee within thirty (30) days of a written request by the Resident Committee and prior to: (1) Alterations or deletions oP amenities, services, or equipment; of reyulaCicns. (Z) Changes to the Mobile Home Park rules and With respect to any concerns submitted in writing by the Resident Committee to the Owner, Y.he Owner shall provide a written response to the action Stems within twenty (70) days of to the meet i.ng. 11. (3Qile.32tiation ~ ~Sr,~Yion g1i Agreement. Within the six (f,) month period prior to the termination of this Agreement, Owner and City may renegotiate the terms of this Ayreemonb. 77. Rem,ad'es• A. <'ity shall enforce the provisions of this Ay regiment on behalf oP a Resident or Residents in the event. of broach of or non-compliance with Cnis Aq regiment by Owner. B. Any Resident aggrieved by a breach of or non-cor,ptiance with this Agreement by an Owner shall, as a third party beneficiary of, this Agreement, have the riyht cn such r~~s ident~s own behalf to prosecute a civil action against owner, ) j L- F E H- 2 T- 9 2 T H U 1 0 0 5 M g R K M q N u'"+ g R C c Y N S K I P I S i 1 T in any court of competent jurisdiction, to enforce the provisions of this Agreement yr recover damages for the breach hereof. 13. Miscellaneous. A. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of callforn ta. B. The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of each owner. C. Zf any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be unlawful or is otherwise invalidated by a final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Agreement which can be implemented without the invalid provision or appl lcatfon, and to this end, the provisions of this Agreement are deemed to be severable. D. To the extent that the context oP this Agreement so requires, the singular shall include the plural and the maeculine, feminine and neuter genders shall each include the other. E. This Agreement may not be altered, amended or revoked except by an instrument in writing executed by City and all owners who era signatories hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lhe parties hereto hove executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CNCAMONGA By: _ Dennis L. Stout, Mayor T+TPEST: Debra J. Adnnr, ,~ciYy clerk APFROVF,D AS TO FORM: James~t,. Markman, ~C ity~Attorney IS3 ate. FE 8-2 T-92 T HU 1 9 0S M CuRKMCaN ~ A12 C. 2'~'N5K I P 1~- I T OWNER: ALTT. LACUNA N.OBILE HOME ESTATES BY~ _..._. _.._..._.. _ ALTR VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK BY: __._....-__...__....._. CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK BY~ __~~~_.._.---~._....---'--- CHAPARRAL HETGHTS MOBTLE MOMS PARK ey: FOOTHILL N.OBILE MAt]OR ey: RAMONA VILLA N.OBILE HOME PARK BY~ ._..___._-_____ SYCAMORE VSLI,A MOBILE fiOME PARK BY• ___._ 15 ~~ xu u~Ma: ccenra Q-q F' E 8 - .~ ~ - - ~ r H i ~ 1 C+ : a S rt ri F' p: M H N - .i R, r .+~ _ 'rF p r a v ~ v'; gYHSbIT "A" Alu Laguna Nabil+ Hora Park A +upplsra+ne eo cha llgM le Bona Yark Accord, en agreemanc Se tveen cha City of L^cbo Cucueongy sad che'avaet of aubj a<e eobiL+ bona park. Ae eatabl ishad b7 Se cc ion iOiA; of cha Mobiie Hose Park Accoz d, the park over .hall furgiab all of the facil i[iu a¢d utilities liacad b+l ov So alt et igible reside ac• at ¢o e:[ra charge, R+crtacion Ar+a 1. Hu cad av laJm i¢y Pool Z, Peol aide fur¢L[un (chaise longue, ehain, eabi u, umbrella) J, Shover and ea croons 4. Spa 5. Picnic Ana rich ca hies and gas ba rbeq ues 5, shuffleboard rope (b coot u) Club Hovu Pat alit i+s i. Kitchen (2 ref rige ascot e, b ov ensh cov a. 2 dishvahera) ? Card Rope 3. billiard Rood (3 pool to blue) b. Retreat ioo Roe S. Sev in6 Rooa 6, Dicing Roane (2) 7. Ceaa ral Floe ticg Room 8. Rest rooms 9, Libr arw (telev isloc, soE e, cha it a, hooka) 10. Stage ll. Stereo Slat em 12. Offite Sa ty`cea Ca Stte et Lig6ti¢g ~~¢xac.>ic S'fi'E4~ .1~- J.~.~ 2. va car/8ever 9e rv ice J. Disposal 9etw' /{r.1ArAw(a,..,.. A• ins 4lLti on charge) :~~ S 5. Coanon Ana tfaiq [a naccr (Club House, Re ce ea ciao/pool er ea, gr eecbe lt, [rase, sh~uba, rtre+ta, turbo) 6, 8treai 9veaping Ssrvica (conch l7) L laundry Facil iciaa (2 roome - 3 vahers, 6 dryer.) 2. R. 9, Pe rkiog (moachlp cbarge) 3. Gua st Parki¢g 4, Fla it bo see 5. Spa ce ltUnb+rs Curbside 6. Car Wuh Rcil itiw ~~ 7. Stop Slg¢a b. Park Di ra ctor7 and Hap F~ES-.-.'-v~ TF•U 33:c~ r,v F'f'i~4 i. i~ v..[_ yc , ~ 1 E 3 T t'lf8 ib?Y "A" Alegi Yiata ttobils Hots Park A eupplemme co gibe Ywbil¢ bogie Part Antor d, an agreement be tvae~ the Cicy of fla n<ho Cucamonga and the oroez c! mb; etc mobile hcne park, An satabiiebed b7 Se cc ion iuA'''f the !Sobile °ome Park Ac card, iba park ovaer eha1l Curn L6 a1i of the facfliciee and ut is ittee listed be lov to nll al igiSln ra eideate at an e:er• charge. •CTlAt i JA Aree i. 6aaced 9v Lring Fool 2. Shading Pool 3. Jancuaai 4. 9horr:r/Eeacevom• 5. Teonia Couree (3) d. Esaka CbllS court C tub g ug ~e Teel itlai 1. [i tchan (stove, vv en, dlebvuber, refrigerator) 2. billiard Aoom (: pool ub1eJ 1. Ca sd Aoaa 4. Csae ral Meeting Room 5. Dtf ic• Se_ rv ices i. Et: ¢ae Lighting 2. wa ter!9evar bsniu 5. Dtepoul Ben ic• 4. Cable T.Y. 5. Common Aru Ma iuteaanu (club house, recreation /Dool era a, [reee, eh rube, aereelse curbs) Q,ySr ni iaa 1. A. Y, larking (one spa e• - mo achl? charge? _ Z, G~dut Balk inA 3, ?ia ilbogea c. Speed Europe FEE- 2 i -9~ THU 1 e c t~+T MPFKMRFI a rF(~'Z`r'NSF I p_ y =_, i l• :z HlBtt '~A^ Casa 'JO is me Mobile Home Park A supplement to the Mobile Home Park Accord, en agreement between the City of .Ra rc ho Cucamonga and the orm er of sub;ect mobile home Dark. As establ i5h ed by Section 10(Aj of the Mob tie Home Park At co rd, the park owner shall furnish all of the facilities and utilities listed below to all eligible residents at no extra charge. Recreation Area 1. Heated Swi mni ng Pool 2. Poolside Furniture (chaise Lounges, chairs, ±a tiles, umbrellas, water cooler) 3. Dressing/Shower Area 1, SpA S, Shuffleboard (4 courts and equipment) C tu_b Nou se Fdc it tries 1. Kitchen (stove, oven, re fr tge ra tor, table, coffee urns) 2. Card Room (tables and chairs) 3. BIl1{ard Room (3 pool tables, chairs) 4, Recreation Room (ping po ng table, to lev is to n, couch, chalrs, book shelf) 5. HO Dby/work Room 6, General Mee tl n9 Rocm (end tables, coffee tables, couches, chalrs, lamps, to tiles, piano, clock, bookshelf, fo ld tng chalrs) 7. office 8. Restrooms (/) 9, Skorerooms lr,, stage il. P.A, System 12. Atr Purifiers 13. Bingo Board System Services 1. Street lighting 2. waterJSewer Service 3, Gisposal Service (ll trash bin enclosures) 1, Ce moron Area Mlfnto na nce (club house, recreation/pool area, gre=_nbeit, trees, shrubs, streets, curbs, shu fflebea rd) •)r, h.?r IYenities 1. Laundry Fac tli ties (2 washers, 2 dryers, 2 chairs, 1 table, 3 sinks) 2, Guest Parking 3. Ma llhoxes 1, lark Dl roc to ry end Map 5. Blue Oo 25 )'> i FEE_-~ ~ -_ ~ T4i!i 1 r_t c 4J F. MHF'N'MRP1 R F C '.' N 5 K. I F' g 1 E%Hi6(T "A" Ctiapa~ral He id ht5 Mobile Hone nark A supplement to the McDite Ho.re ?ark .c cord, an agreement De*_ween the i~ of Rancho Cuc amd r•ga and the owner of sub Ject mdDile horn park. .y .45 established by Section 10(A) of the Mobile Home Park Accord, the oa rk Owner shall furnish al' of the fac iii Cf es and utilltias listed below to r, 11 elig iD le residents at no e,<tra charge. Recreation Area 1. Neeted Sw!mming Pool (gas ar.d sa lar heating) Poolside Furniture (lc unges, chairs, to bl es, umD re llas) 3. Spa 4. Dressing Area and Showers 5, Picnic Area with Tables and Gas Zarbecues (2) 5. Shuffleboard Courts (2) 7, Horseshoe Court 8, Tennis Court Club Hou e F cilSties t. Kitchen 5to ve/oven, refrtge rato r, dishwasher, grill) 2. 'a rd Room (T,V., tables, and chairs) 3, Billiard ROOm (2 pool tables) 4, library 5. Restrooms 5, General Neettng Rp om (ta bies, chairs, piano, stereo) 7, Office 6erv lc.s Street Lighting (gas! 2. Disposal Service 3, Sewer Service 3, Common Area Maintenance !club house, recreation/pool area, gre enDelt, t1'8 e5 shrubs, streets, cu rD a) Other Amen itle5 ~- laundry FaciUties (6 washers, 6 dryers) 2. Master T.Y. Antenna (cabled to each site) 3. R.Y. Da rking (monthly charge) h. R.Y. Ou mp Station S. Guest Parking 6. Mailb O:es ? Park Di rot to ry; Map 8. Stop signs 9. Street Signs l>~ F E B- 2 T-= r H U 1 0: ¢i E. t9 q F K P1 q N .9 g p p g y N 5 Y S F 1 4 1 gXB iSSY "A" Pooth ill ?b bile Mawr A tuppleseat to ch• Mobi la goes Park Accord, as asreereat between ehe Cicq of Ra acbo Cucaaonga •nd the owner f tubjact sobila hose park. M atubl iah ed bq Sect ioa 10(A?of the Mobile Soaa Park Accord, th• park ovaer than fur aiah all of the Eac it isiu end ucilitiu lire ed below Co all et ibf ble reeideate ac no erera charge. Rrcrujj yil Area 1. Hea ud Sriming Pooi 2. Pool aid• Turai tur• J. 9hu!l laboatd Court Club Moue F.c it [t iee 1. Eicchen (refrigerator, atowa) Z. Gaaerd Mee cing goou (YV, luraiture, pool table) J. Ra atrooae q. 0!!iu 9ervicet 1. 9tr •et Ligh tiag Z. Water/Swr- 9•rv ice 3. Diapoaal Serviu ;, coam,oo Aru Na iatweace (Club Ha we, Re creacioo/pool •rea, greenbelt, tree a, ah rube, etree n) 3. Street Sweeping 45htr Auen tti {.~ 1. Lauad:q facil is iee 2. Gue ac Parking 1. Stop Slgaa I ~'1 ®111: 'A" ., __ .__^_._ laiosl Flila tbbi le loan perk A euppi seas to sfe M¢bile fouwo peek Aeco H, ee alregeas br wean the City of Aaacho cneaooepa sef tke oeeee e6 oak lace sebiia hose park. Ae act a-11abeA -y 8setiq 7(0) Of t-e Wobl le ieae 7aeR Ae coed, the pork owner .hall teroi a- t et cho loch it Lea aa/ uelliciea llacad beiw to ell elilf blo n•SMe[e aC m eaaae c-Arp. B•ctmtfae lrea 1. 14seed ovdoltt~ Mss t. peel slit 11ni[ere (e-at ae loniuel, ebairr, tailea, usbrrol lea) 7. L<erael A. 1. uae 7. (7ae•ty Yswt/1-eear ,u A. (se; :ia• tow irttd egelpsvat) ' 6eeuey low (r1tY get•..esti ; 1. I.arl,r Trae- 1i• t. larbeewe (1) -~1vb buu pat tl It le• i. [itca•e (.tone, Orel, /l•WuhK, r•L rl~erator) Cud low '-. ltll tend low t7 paol tablee) a. Cratt low .. lreok(a•[/Ola tel bow E.. Gwra1 INettoS lce~ (eabl •a and <h•tn) 7 . 4et row. 8. itbrer. 'r. F. law ~. Ut[tco !t°~`i/ .. !t tact Ly6U as "a. Hater, lever leN (te 7. 'JUpoul larv tce <. ~uemo Art Mnieteoeece (c;ub 6auu, reenet toe/pool area, lroeobe lt, [rN e, •-WN, etnate, curb•7 Sner~-.1 i111 1. i..,,aary recll ttlu (2 waker•, 3 dryer) 1, karter Aa4aoa 9yates ). e, v, park lei aed Morale (ll{i ud, irwala.: el .crawl ouS let. (soatbly cSarle ', 4. wa•t parktal (53 aMae•? S. Witbow• 1rit0 rent Acct'. ose) 6. 9oe<e Masher. Cur kel/e ~ r•tM Dt ractorglaap 8. Co c~:raa (lock Vail Werowd pl perk 7. 9ok lua (key. (un lahe/ [o roe ideate) ;0, Ipeed bap J1, ltop fiy• i2. Car Yee- Rirll i[ler ':). Olt ht•poaal •aae IA. e. Y. [nyp Eu[loo l laed •peu• ntth EXNIBI7 "A" Svc amo re 'liila Mobile Home Park A suo element to the ,Mobile Nome Park Accord, an ag re erne nt between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and tae owner of subject me bile home park. As established by Section 10(A) of the Mcbile Home ?ark Accord, Lhe vark owner shall fur^ish a'•1 of the facilities and utilities listed below to all eligible residents at no extra charge. Recreation Area 1, Heated Sw i;nming pool 2. poolside Furniture (chaise lounges, chairs, tables, umbrellas) 3. Jacuzzi 4, Dressing Room/Showers 5, Shuffleboard (with equipment) Club House Facilities I. Kitchen Facilities (stove/oven, refrigerator) 2. Card Room (tables and chairs) Billiard Room (2 pool tables and equipment) 4, General Meeting Room (couches, coffee and lamp tables, operating fireplace, carpeted area in front) 5. Re strooms 5. Office Storage Room (residents) 8. Living Room/Conversation Room (television, couches, chairs, tables, lamps, bookcase and books, operating fireplace) S=rv ices 1. Street Lighting Z. 'dater/Sewer Service 3. Disposal Service 4. Common Area Maintenance (club house, recreation/pool area, greenbelt, trees, shrubs, streets) Other Pmenities 1 Laundry Facilities (4 wa she r5, 5 dryers, drying yard) ~ - . ' ~~kEC~ 3. Guest Parking r/~~! 1. Mailboxes (with space numbers) i S Park Directory/Map is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - MEMORANDUM {, ~~i,~9 1_ fiC ~ rCK DATE: Mazch 4, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jan Su[ron, Deputy City Clem4l Qm--- SUBIECT: CORRECTION TO TITLE OF TTEM D12 ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR i This memo is to clarify two clerical errors ]fisted in the tide of item D 12 on the Consen[ Calendaz regarding the release of Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. Por Contract 89-160, the project description should be the Sapphire Parkway Renovation and Trail Retrofit north of Banyan Street, not the Banc Line Road Beautification project as listed Also, the second listing for CO 90-073, 19th Street and Amethyst Street, is incorrect. That should have been listed as requesting release of CO 90-443, the Atrow Route Street improvements from Center Avenue to Haven Avenue project Thank you for your consideration. /m 92/lua GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS eeorcary 20, :592 Y 0 3 E n .: A v Y 9 i g S ii E L L C A .i n A S H C I T _ _ _ _ Y _ _ _ _ O _ _ e _ _ R _ _ A _ _ N _ _ C _ _ H J _ _ _ _ C U . _ _ _ _ _ _ ; A M _ _ _ _ O N v _ _ _ _ _ _ A _ _ apared oy: prepared for: .r C Gor~ 3ri.cker MR. JUE ULESON Pres~oent LE WIS HOMES MA[JAGEFIh ~.T, INC. t P. J. Bcx fi70 /mmo Upland, Cal i.for ni.a, 91735 1521 East Seventeenth Streel, Smle K • Santa Ana. Catilornia 92701 • Phone (714) 835-0249 fAX (714) 835.1957 0 52/x08 GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS 6 u M M A R Y The car wash no i.se levels were def i.ned ch ro uyn a comb~.na- ti.on of field measurement and anaiysi.s. The 29 hour ambient level was def ~.ned by field measurement. Erom this data, car wash soune levels ware compared to the allowee no.i se cri ter i.a cf the G.ty, ant the existi.nq ambient noise level fox a vetiety of opera t.i,onal condi. ti.ons. The find ings are as follows: The car wash will comply with the land use noise triter i.a of the City. 2. The ter wash will comply with file Development Code no.i.se cz i.tet is of the CiCy. The car wash sound levels will be less than the ambient no i,se levels based on the acoustic measures used by the City. As a result, the conclus.i on is that the car wash sound em iss+.ons do not ;,mpact the neatest resid antes. There is no special mi. N.ga ti.on requiree except to insure that file si.x toot (6') wall that i,s normally placed outs i.de the entrance is i.nclud ed i.n [n i.s plan. - ~62t East Sever~eenth Street Suite K Santa Ana. Calilorma 92701 Phone (714) 8350249 FAX pt4) 8351957 1 92/iUE GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS i•J iiv'1'RVDUCi'I UN It i.s proposed to erect a self-serve caz sash as part of a yas sta t.i on ana cunveni ence store tacrlity at the southwest corner of Baseline end Rochester i.n ::ne Ci. ty o: Ra r,cho Cccamonya. The ioca ti.cn +.s notad on dzhi oi.t i. :he Si.ta ::ap i- sncwn or, 8xhioit 2. Currently the only resi.d en t.i.ai aria that could be t?.pacted 6y tiie car wash opera ti.on i.s ioca ted on the east side of Rochester. The houses aze s.i. ^yle-story oweili.nys and a live w six ,~ to bi loot wail parallels the stzee t. L.J APPLICAdr,L .VV iSL CRITERIA The City has the foiiowi.ng two applicable criteria: 1• The Land Use Compatibility crtter i,a i.s 65 dnA C;vEi. ~• The Performance otandards fox noise sets a level of 6G c6A from 7 A.N. to lU P,M., and 55 d8A from 10 P.M. to i A.M. for any ope ra t.i.on exceed i.ny JU minutes i.n any hour. Those between i5 and 3G minutes are allowed levels 5 dBA 'n i.yher. 3.0 DESCRIPTIGN OF THE VPERATI Ot7 'f he prcposea wash system is a RYCO Revexse Jsmosis wash and rinse un i. [. There is no cryer. The reverse osmosis process ccnverts standare tap water into dei.o nixed water. The wash process is as follows: 1• The dr i,ver purchases as w„sh ti.cKet ac the convenience store. The ti.cKet CJ ntain5 a LLVc d+yit computer generated code. 'P he driver pays lior ai.ther .; i.ngle or doodle wash. '521 East Seve nteenlh Street, Sude K • Sama Ana, Cahforma 92707 . Phone (714) 8350249 FAX (71418351957 2 92/lU8 1• The driver moves the car to the wash tunnel entrance, stops, and <eys i.n the five atg it code. if the rceyed code matches one on the computer a computer generated voice to structs the or i.ver to proceed into the tunnel. }• A red/green ii.yht, which reads green, i.s i.n the tunnel. The artver moves the car forward slowly until the right front ti.re engages a pressure Sw i.tCh. At Lhat moment tpe li,y ht SWi.tChes to red dhd the dr i,ver holds that position. The wash cycle starts shortly thereafter. 9. The wash cycle farces 7U seconds dur i.ng whzcn time the soap +,s applied and the wash brushes are swept across the car. At the end of the wash cycle, the l.iy r,t turns yreen again. ~• The driver moves the car forward to the rinse arch. The car i.s moved slowly through the rinse arch ar,d exits out of the tunnel. The rinse por ti.on can farce up to 9b seconds. Overall, the wash and rinse cycle can take up to 116 seconds (aoout 2 mi.nu tes) for a sing ie wash. A douo le wash woule farce 18b seconds, or sii.gh fly over 3 minutes. Since only one car at a time +.s allowed i.n the tunnel, the maximum hourly thru-put i.s 2U cars to 3U cars. The reverse osmosis de i.noni.zed water i.s stored i,n a b7 gallon coot a.i ner. The water i.s used for the ri.n se. when the tanrc is drawn down to one-half capaci. ty (33.5 gallons), a pump comes on [o ref i.ll the tank. The ref i.lllny process takes ten minutes. The frequency of the ref i.ili, ng depends on the rinse water demand. If every car took the maximum ri.n se time allowed, f.t ve gallons of water would be used. This means that 6.7 cars would tr.i gger the refill mode. At 30 cars per hour maximum rate, this amounts to 4.5 average ref i.l is per hour, or 95 mi. r.u tes per hour that the ref i.ll i.s tr. process. Thus, i.t is poss i.ble that ref .i.ll opera ti.on coulti oe co r,t i.nuous. Actual experience i.nd i.ca tes that the maximum thru-put of su cars rarely occurs. ohell does not report sta ti.s tics by hour at present. 6amples of tnru-put by day were taken recently and served as the basis of th i.s report. The sta ti.s ti cs ind.i ca to that i,n the f i.rsC i6 days of January, for a typical suburban ope ra ti.on, the d a~iy thru-put was a low of 42 cars to a ni.yh of 193 cars wi. th an average of 135. In the first seven days of February, [he Low was 12 cars any the it i.yh was 2i2 cars wi. ti an average of 119. shell reports that almost all this ac ti. v.i ty occurs between 5 A.M. and 11 P.M. Typically the th ru-put from p.M. to 5 A.M. i.s less than f i.ve (5) cars total, or about one car ue ~ , -- -'i 3 92/108 ~6~1:; m,,... +. ~ :•1EASvnEMENTS a `L.~•e F~~f:- 4.1 1. h t( ryAJJI %+ naw Shell wash using the RYC~ rzverse osmosis system was tested. The i.n staiia ti.on was at the turner of :xi.s Street and Perris Bouievarc i.n the City of Moreno Valley. The measurements could only oe maae at 2u feet from tie edge o£ the bui. ld i.ny at the ex.i,t and entrance aue to noise from the street ano some site cons tra i.n ts. The levels are yi.v en i.^ Table 1. The areas are shown on Exhi. pi.t i. TABLE i MEASURED NOISE LEVELS 2U FEET' LEVELS AVERAGE MAXIMOM LUCATIUN vPERATION SINGLE DOUBLE SINGLE DOUBLE Entrance Side Tiash/Rinse 68 70 72 75 Reverse Osm. 73 - i4 - Ex i.t Si.de nasn; Rinse o7 - 76 - Recerse Osm. i4 - i5 - Sampies of the va r.ious measurement events are attached as Exhi.b i.ts 3, 4, 5, and 6. Prev i.ous measure- ments at otner sta ti.on sites have s~n own that the fall-off rate of five ~5) oBA for each doupling of distance i.s appropria ee cut to 500 feet. Using this fact and the measurements yi.ven i.n TabLe i, curves can be constructed for all of the si. tua ti.ons. 4.2 AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS A site visit was maae and measurements conducted of the ambient noise ieve ls. A sa mpie of th=_ noise pa ttexns at a po.i.nt 40 feet from the centerl i. ne of Rochester on the resi.d en t.i ai side (east) is shown on Exnipi.C d. The average level was tit dBA. The race was lti2 cars per hour. The ieveis ranged from a low of 45 dBA to a high of d0 dBA. A monitor was left for a 14 hour period at this same loca ti.on to collect Che dU to needed to compute the CNEL values. The data +.s conta.i ned i.n Append i.x 1. The CNEL value ~t 40 feet from the centerli. ne of RochesteY was 65 CNEL. 4 52/lU8 ~.~ UEV ELGPMENT t;F t:0i5E ;10 DEL The noise data coLiecteo along with the opera t~.onal condi. Lions permits the construction of a noise model. '; ha vartc us cond i.tions are given to Table 2, Note the ralevant or~.entati.on +.s the entrance si.o e. TABLF. 2 VARIOUS NOISE MODELS AT 20 FEET CONDITION ii ~.ghest hour for thru-put of sO cars us i.ng si.ngie wash and maximum ri.n se t.i.me wi the pump cycles ii i.5hest hour 11 P.;1. to 5 A.M. for cars using double wash and maximum ~.n se ane one pump cycle rii.ghest day using 2i2 cars co tal w i.th 5 cars/hour from 11 P. ,. to d A. M, and 1s.4 cars/hour in ail other .;ours of the day LEVEL AVERAGE LEVEL OR C:4EL OVER ~0 MIN. 73 Avg. 74 55 Avg N/A 75 CNEL N/A The nearest ras.iden tiai properties are 1d0 feet from the entrance to the car wasn. Negiec ti.ng any effect of any walls for the moment, the pro7ec ti.on at this distance would result i.n a 16 dEA decrease ~n the levels at 20 feet. The results are gi.v en i.n Taole 3 on the following page. 5 iL 108 TAB Li. ~ VARiOU~ GOiSE MGGELd 12 RESiJEiJTiai PROPERTY LiiJE ,:ONDiTION 'r..i.ghest hour far thru-put of 30 cars usi.ny szng ie wash and maximum r i.nsa time wi. ,n i Pump cycles Hi.yhesc hour 11 ?.?1. co ~ a.M. for cars cs ~.ny douo.a wash and maximum e in sa :ne one pump cycle H~.y nast day usi.ny 272 cars to tai wtth ~ cars/hour from 11 P.M. to 5 a.M. and 13,5 cars/hour i.n all other hours of the day LEVEL AVERAGE LEVi:L OR CNEL OVER 50 Mi:v. 57 av y. 58 s~ avy. :.,a i5 CNEL N/A 6,O IMPACT a;1ALYGIS The si.tua v.on for the various cond.i. ti.ons i.s compared to the allowed values li.s ted under the appLi.cable noise cr~teri.a. The average level is essen ti.a J.ly to be the level exceeaed :U mi.nuces i,n the hour for the worst case hour. The n i,gnesc Hour from ii P.M. to 6 P.M. only uses up 25 m.i nutes .in the hour, so the allowed cri.teri.a can be raised 5 deA. The compa r.is ons are gi.v en i.n Taoie 4. 'FABLE 4 VARIO L'S SOIJE MODELS AT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE C 0:IPARED TO CRITERIA WITHOUT HALLS ION CRITERIA DiFFEREt.Cc Hiyhest hour for thzu-put of 30 cars usi.ny s'nyia wash and maximum rinse time wi.tn 5 pump cycles tiJ day - 2 65 night + i n~yhest hour .+ P,M. to 5 a.*I. for cars using dounie cra s'n and ma xi.mum ri.n se and one pump cycle. bU ni,y ht - 30 H.i.yhes[ day using 272 cars total w~.th 6 cars/hour from 11 P.M. to 6 A.M. and i3.9 cars/hour i.n all other hours o[ the day 65 - 6 b vz/loB The analysis indi.ca tes that the car wash will only exceed t^e allowed cn.ter.ia ^nd er the cond ~. t.i.on that the maximum thr u-put occurs oetween iU P.M. and 11 P. M., or ~ A. M. ana 7 A.,y, HoweVe r, this noes not taxe i.n to accocot any walls [hat are placed between the car w.,sh and the res is ent+.ai un +.ts. Two such walls exi.s t. The car wash has a stx foot (u') wail lust outside the entrance. The resicentiai un i. is have another si.x loot (6') foot wall. The caicula ci.ons in Appenc i.x 1 indicate roar these two walls i.ntrod uce i1 aBA addl. t i.onai red ucti.on. This means that the Conditions of Table 4 are mod:.fiec, The res ui is are given in Table 5. TABLE 5 VARIOUS NOISE MODELS AT RESIDENTSAL 2ROPERTY LINE COMPARED TO CRITERIA WITH WALLS CONDITION CRITERIA DIFFERENCE H i.g hest hour Eor thru-put of i0 cars us i.ng single wash and maximum r i.n se time with 5 pump cycles Highest hour li P.r~. to 5 A.M. for cars using dounie wash and max i.mum rinse and one pump cycle Hi. y'n est eay us i.ny 272 cars total wi.[h 5 Cars/hour from 11 P.M. to 5 A.M, ana 1i.4 cars/hour ;n all othar hours of [he day tiU day - 13 55 night - d 60 night - 41 65 - i7 All condi. t+.ons sa t.i sfy the cr i. ter.i a. Another way to look at the i,mpac[ i.s to compare the proposed pro? ect to the ex.i sting no.i.se levels. The existing noise Level i.s 65 CNEL wi_thout-accoun ti.ng for the exi.s ti. ng wall along Rochester. Allowing the 5 dBA previ_o usly discussed for [h i.s wall, makes the exi.s ti.ng level i.n the rear yards 60 CNEL. The highest CNEL no.i se level projected i.s 4d CNEL based on the projectee level of 59 CNEL without the wails, and an 11 dBA effect of both walls. T hi.s means that the exis tiny tr aff i,c CNEL level is 12 dBA over the projected project level i.n the rear yards. This means that the ex+.s tiny traff i,c noise essen ti.ally masxs any no+.se from the car wash. The rela ti.onsh i.p of the amb.i ent to the project level can oe exam i.ned i.n other ways as well. During the period 11 P.M. to 5 A.M., the mi. n i.mum amoi,ent hour, as measured by the average no i.se level, occurred from 2 to 3 A,M. The average level accounting for the wall would be 43 dBA. During the same hour, the average level 92/lU8 from the car warn «ouia oe ;1 aBA. Thus, the amni.ent i.s ni.g her than the Cai wash oy 2 dBA. fur ing the period 5 A. M. to L1 P.M., u;e m.i.n i,mum average hour would be 5g dBA. The car wash would be 28 dBA, or 31 dBA less. Thus, looki.nq at the .issue on the basis of the average hour for the worst case si.tua t.i ons, the car wash would s ti, 11 oe less Chan the exi.s ting amni.ent noise levels. Maximum noise levels are the instantaneous level that occurs as a car passes the houses along Rochester. The max ,.mum car levels i.n the 24 hour measurement varied from 63 to 82 dBA i.n the rear yards. The car wash level was never greater than 47 dBA. Thus, the ambient maximum levels are 16 to 35 dBA higher Chan the car wash. 7.U MITIGATION All the various measures of no.i.se indicate that the project «.i 11 not .impact the nearest re s.id ences. No addl. ti.o nal mi ti.ga tion is required. Note that the presumption is that a si.x foot wall, typically used outside the entrance, wi.11 ^e .i.ncluded in th i.s plan. EXHIBIT 1 SITE LOCATION MAP ~_ ~ ,•,~..a -. r - - ~.. ~_ ~ L~„ ad, _ ... -,a,' , 'li~~ ~ -- __G___~-___ _ _ -gal. I yL~j~ ,~ 9LVD 1 + a ~;~- 9 Yy.. vr'r ~. B EXHIBIT 2 SITE MAP ~; :.~... 1 ~~, F,,,; 0 Nf~ r/ /( .'iA'1.N RUC ~ r~.r~i~~ ~~ • rr~r ~~ -..._ - ~.~~-T~. CAR WA~ i v - ~T~ ~ n ~e ~ r ~ ~ ~. ? -4 ~ . , .. _ ----tl ._ .vn etwl ~; ru~rrt nwil M 4'IV L.~ .• _ ~ __ ~, .. .= -'v, i ~ ce.'.. F .... ,. ~e xoo:u.. ~} Rtr~bR iai3F'd I-- ~_ Z YO w 1- LL O N Q W O 41 f X Ul W ~ W ~ J U ~ U x p N Q W 3 d z N p W (L J < < `z v` o O V W J m 0 m 0 O O O O O O m m r. m a a i i i ~ i i I O O 0 0 ii .iii ;i ~.I ii ,, ~ i O O O m o o • O m d O O O O O O m m n m e a i i i r ~ i O O O O O O O O A m O b ~ O C J O o„ _~ W O iA V 6 W N w ~ J f f > 1.: < U LL I N W 3 w a x N C r w ~ W ¢ J < r < < U o v rvn ~ 0 m 0 O O O O O O a m ti m e a I I I I I I 'i II' I ~ 717 ~I # ~' I l l l Y 1i l ill l I '~ ~ ~~ ~li r. " ~adi~l~~",i~-I~II~II~~ I I I 1 1 I s o Ip. m o o° ~ 0 m 0 O O O O p O m m A m b Y 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 °s o we o o r 0 C J O H _~ K~ WI ~r J LL J N ~ N 4 ~ < w 2 J 2 W ~ _ W O W a 2 rn p r w r ~ < t V O V tq J O O O r O 0 0 0 0 n 0 ~~ I ill li! III ~I I!~ ~ j I!il' „~IiI 11111 it i ail ~i~ ~~~~~~I I O I f m 0 O O O O O O m 0 n m b Y I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 O O O O o O O O I. ~ O O O m 0 O O O O O O ~ ~ h D N O I I 1 I I I :R C -~ O 00 m m r x {~.~ w J iF~ U a0 ~N ai y W y ~ Oy f 02 .E W < r < y f 2 Z W W O ~ W W W ¢ 4 a Z y O f' W H W R J < F < t V < 2 V O O V y J II~iI~11~+~~N~~llil 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I O O O O O O o O O O O O O O A m O d f O • h O O b O O O m O r m O O O Rl m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m 1 t0 I ~ m I I N I f 1 m I 0 I n 1 m I b I f 1 I O n 0 f O J .- 00 EXHIBIT 7 AVERAGE NOISE LEVELS FOR WASH CYCLE SELF SERVICE CAR WASH WITH NO DRYER ~B MEASURED POINT 85 ~5 I --- I f , 10 D ~ - o° O° ~ I !5 45° 45° - ~ F I 90 ~ ~ , 9,ti ~ o ~ 5' --- f -'\ ?'~ r 50 \~~ io ioo ~ooo D19TANCE FROM CENTERLINE a' f a u O~ m m l O J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m N m N f m ~ !. m b f I 1 I 1 ~ ~ I GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 1 24 HOUR AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENT 1621 Easl Seventeenth Street, Sune K Santa Ana, Cahforma 92701 • Phone (714) 835.0249 FAX (714) 8351957 DATA REPORT LABBON-DAVI3 LABS -- MODEL '00 n_; ^_./9. L^:r3:30 5N 709B1739 PArE 1 D•?ae 6".:5. l1 crn~ ,.°ic ,!I L'JL X0.4 Time 00.4:0 3: ?6 Lorin =4,0 L m aY :',a,n PP ~K n '- 's ut,D n RMS E< nn~i~i Fk E¢ nnn0 R!S ~~ t Memory `.??^,0 L02 6£1.0 L03 64.$ L^_5 °0.0 L50 .,.0 SE:Tt1P DATA .u••~.........•...~.......•r~•....... •••.....•••..•..••. Cecc 3LON N9hc A Pk Unv9c •0 ^nc ..0 7hld 'ZJ Exch 3 LDL •0 Pk B h d T ld 140,0 Hyet 0 Run dace 0^.:^4 Stop date 00/00 Run time 1 10:00 3tOp time 1 99:00 Rwi eime 2 99:00 Stop W me 2 99:00 Exed •0 Into •1 Time 01:00 Auto-atop •0 Ln -1 Hiac •0 8avc Pk •0 Per 60.9 Cal 27.5 Vir 1.x10 i :n .ry; ~ i , I NTV REPORT L.4ESON-DAMS LAMS -- MODEL 700 02/25N_2 I_:43:40 SN 700H1739 PAI+E CnG LVL BEL Lmax Ldc Lmin Date 'has Dar Ex Pk 0~ =0 5 gc,p 7g, ¢_ g 1 42.5 ^_4 FEH U):On:01 1:00 F.:m 4 ~~ 0 L^_ 57.5 LO6 63. `• L25 53.4 L°~0 • .5..p _ Fp,O yc,5 ?i, n 101.5 39.0 ^_4 FEE 11 ar4:01 I:00 h:a 0 C n L:'_ 68.5 L08 Ei.° L^` q~.0 ..50 __... 3 61.4 2F,5 :°. ^, 103.0 4n.0 "_4 F~ IS a'.0 a'I :')U h:m 0 0 L'i= 89.0 L48 64.11 L2_ 59.0 ..E9 `.5.9 4 53.5 .5.0 34.5 104.0 40.C 24 FEH !3:00:41 L'OV F.:m 4 n LU2 • 5',.0 LOg 62.° L15 .~.. L50 • 54.,U 5 60.9 ?B.U ". .9 37.0 44.5 24 FEE 14:00:01 1:00 h:m 0 0 L02 - 68.5 L08 - 64.5 L^^-5 60.5 L50 - `6.5 5 69.5 28.5 g4.5 104,5 42.5 24 FEH 15:00:01 1:00 h:m 0 0 0 L02 70,5 L08 88.0 L25 - 62.5 L50 59.4 . F2.0 97.5 79.5 111.0 45.0 24 FEB 16:U4:01 1:00 F.:m 4 4 n L02 69.5 L08 • 66.U L25 BC.S L50 • 59.4 62.0 a7.5 '.0 30.0 46.5 24 FEB +.7:00:01 L40 h:m 4 0 LOC 68.5 LOg - 65.5 L15 • 52.5 L50 • 59.5 9 81.5 37.0 ?1.5 95.5 44.5 ^_4 FEe ig:40:01 L00 h:m 0 0 U L02 66.5 LOB 65.5 L25 • 62.0 L50 • 59.4 ~- 14 53.`. ''25.0 7~.0 87,0 43.5 24 FEH 19:00:01 1:00 h a 0 0 0 L00 • 88.5 L08 - 63.5 L25 - 60.0 L50 • 56.0 ll 59.5 ?4.U 72.5 99,0 41.5 24 FHB 20;DO:U1 1:00 h:m 0 0 0 LG2 86.5 L08 62.5 L25 58.5 LSO - 55.0 l2 58.0 93.5 75.7 28.5 40.5 44 FEH 21:00:01 1:00 h:m 0 0 0 _ L02 fi6.5 L08 82.5 L25 • 58.0 LSO 53.5 1, 56.5 ?2,n ~4.P g6.0 37.5 ^-4 fEH 22:00:01 1:00 h:m 0 0 'r L01 65.5 L08 60.5 L25 55.5 L50 = 50.5 14 58.0 ?3.5 37.^ 100.5 35.5 24 FEH 23:00:01 l:00 ha 0 0 0 L02 65.0 L08 58.5 L25 • 52.5 L50 • 46.5 IS c1.0 96.5 g2.5 11x,0 38.5 25 FEB 0:00:01 l:00 h:^ 0 0 0 L02 70.0 L08 67.0 L25 55.5 L50 46.U l8 50.0 :b.5 71.^ 94.5 36.0 25 FEB 1:00:01 1:00 h:m 0 U 0 L02 59.5 L08 53.0 L25 45.0 L50 - 41.0 l7 47.5 83.0 67.5 P_0.5 34.5 25 FEH 2:00:01 1:00 h:m 0 0 0 L02 58,0 L08 50.5 L25 42,0 L50 ?8.0 l8 »9,U '.4.5 g9.5 ?4.0 25 FEH 3:00:01 1:00 h:m 0 n L02~• 59.0 L08 51.5 L25 43,U L50 39.0 P? 50.5 ?6.0 27.U 115.V 39.4 25 FEH 4:00;01 1:40 h;m 0 0 0 L02 - 67,5 LOB 88.5 L25 - 57.5 L50 50.0 20 59.0 94.5 5 9fi.5 41.5 25 FEH 5:00 :O1 1;40 h:m 0 0 0 LO^ - 66.0 L08 62.5 L25 • 58.5 L50 - 55.0 21 61.0 '26.5 X7.0 90.0 46,0 25 FEH 8:00:01 I;UO h:m 0 0 0 _ LO. - 88.0 L08 85.5 L25 61.0 L50 58.5 22 f+4.5 100.0 g6.') 99.0 49,5 15 FEH 7:04:01 1:00 h:m 0 0 0 L02 ^1,0 L08 68.0 L25 64,5 L50 61.0 23 64.5 98,U 75,4 87.4 44.5 25 FEH 8100 :OI 1;00 h:^ 0 0 0 L02 68.0 L08 65.0 L25 61,5 L50 57.5 24 60.5 96.4 79.5 94.0 42.0 25 FEH 9:OO:OI 1:00 h:m 0 0 0 L02 80.5 L00 84,5 L25 80.5 L50 58.5 -7iesc -6S Lmnl ~-8L I NTV LARSGTi-OAVIS 02!251?2 12:44:41 ~'nt LVL SEL Lmax Ljk• Jt5 53.0 ?2.0 93.h ,_ . LO_ 31.5 33933 REPORT ASS -- lIODk7, 700 SN 70081739 PMaE 3 Lmin Date Time ac E< Pk Qv 42.5 25 PEB 10:00:02 Oa3 h:m 0 0 n L08 54.0 L^5 [q,5 L`.-0 ,4.5 GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL snd ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X BARRIER CALCULATIONS t621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K • Santa Ana, California 92701 • Phone (714) 835.0249 FAX (714)835-1957 ~. @ARRIER NCilSE R.F_DLIC 7I OIJ ANAL'/SIS F'RO.?EC7..._.,CAR HASH DESCF.[PTi C4n..EFFECT OF SOI!RCE EI_r'~:.; f I L"RJ. - .... . RECEIVEF ELEVA7 A?N..,.. BARP,7ER ELE:'A TION...... RECEIVER HEIr,HT. ....... DISTANCE 70 501.!RCE..... DS9TAIJCE TO RF_CE I','EE... SOURCE WOI SE LE'.'F.l.... . ;AR WASH Wgl_L Ai ~:ESIDENCES V ~i it J fir 1 'aO SA, i i!j WALL HE If.H (' IJO 15E LEVEL INSERTION LOSS n. UO .'i9 .. O l 'NARRIEk iJOfSE REDUCTION ANAL`r SIS FROJErT......CAR WAt'H DESCRIPTTON..EFFECT OF SOURCE ELE'JA TIUPL ...... RECEIVER F,:1_EVATIDN..... BARRIER F_LEVATiON...... RECE I'JF_R HEIGHT........ DISTANCE TO SOIJRCE..... DISTANCE TU RECEIVER... SOURCE NUISE LEVEL..... 3ESIDENTIHI WALL WITH CAR WASH WALL fi O Cr 5 I24 10 WALL HEIG=HT PIOISE LE'JEL INSERTIUN LOSS .y.iuj 47.8 5.52 :; r 'l c~ ' f Y1.~:~Q O. ~.edaud~ ~, /99Z /0500~i~rtc /i~y~~Crrc /'[.~ivl/u G~lia~r.~+j~-ate-, ~4 9/30 i1X{~fi/ YJ~. l.~iiss "%7 ~ " c~`~'/ ~i~~-- ~'~, t/~ ~ ~ N e ~ ~ ~Q7 ~ L N ! 1 ~~°~ ~~ ~~ v o ~ .~ (~\'~vV~ V P~ ~~ 0 r 8 SOS 4y~; ~~ fG ~ ~ R ~y ^~ H N m S ran d~ iQ^j ~~ ~ j?'kf~~~; V1T0 DEVImo FRANCESCO nrmRNar wr uw RBAI. WirAT6 aROa6R P.4 Rol[ 6tl ONTARIQ CAL]tORNIA tl Nlf MIN Wil!> ~Ms. Debra J. Adams, City Cler k' City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 February 24, 1992 HAND DELIVERED Ne: Nick Devito, Inc. Assessors Patcel 6227-011-09 11881 Highland Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA Nearing Dale: March 4, 1942 7:30 PM - City Council Chambers To Whom It May Concern: Please let this letter serve as the above referenced property owner's vtitten request to appear and be heard in the matter end(ar matters as outlined in the notice attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Sincere ` ~ fo D err Nic D (714) 8 cc: Mr. Mike Olivier, Senior Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho, Cucamon pa, CA 91730 , i Encl, i'to Francesco y-Treasurer for ito, Inc. -5071 NOTICE OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ADOPT A RESOLU II ON OF NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ASSESSORS PARCEL N0. 227-011-09, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND IMPROVEMENT OF LARK DRIVE FROM ITS EXISTING EASTERLY TERMINUS TO ROCHESTER AVENUE 'AND THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE YCU ARE HEREBY NDTIFIED that, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235, the City of Rancho Cucamonga intends to consider for adoption a Resolution of Necessity to Condemn, fora street improvement project, portions of that certain real property commonly known by Lhe street address 11881 Highland Avenue, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Assessors Parcel No. 227-011-091. and which properties are further described by the legal descriptions and the map depictions attached hereto as Exhibit "A"~ The hearing by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to consider the adoption of said Resolution will De conducted on March 4, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chambers, 10500 Givic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that, pursuant to California Code of C1vi1 Procedure Section 1245.235, if you desire to appear at the above-referenced time and place for said hearing, you may be heard on the matters as follows: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project; 2. Whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with Lhe greatest public good and the least private injury; and, 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired is necessary for the ~~7 project. To appear and be heard on any of the above-referenced items, you must file a written request to appear within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this Notice by filing or delivering a written request to: Debra J- Adams, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Failure to file a written request to appear and be heard as outlined above can result, by law, in a waiver of your right to appear and be heard at the hearing. For further information, contact: N `~ o Y L N U T F N u > _ N C U O 4 C . ~ U V1 U 4 J a NU " cf 'J C c. G p N C C . ~ U n E `] C J ~ ~ rJ .JTU z > -i v V ~ w U 0 C '= O y 'J t TC V v~nO C y..i N SU.yy~ !7 5 ~ y~ ~~ J. < p x :;, s ; c ^ . i Y ~ _ ' Y /. y n ~ 5 Y C 117`(1 I)~V'I'IVJ FKANCESCO AT9YIHN5V AT IAN' H EAL F_4TATF. UHUKBR HAND DELIVERED P. V NO% Sb1 11\TA NIt I. ('A I.I Ih 1HYlA 81'lBY 1~1 i19d.1:IB:IB February 28, 1992 Ms. Uebra J. Adams, City Clerk Cicy of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive 3ancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 Mr. ?like Olivier, Senior Engineer City of Rancho Cucamon p,a 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Nick DeVi[o, Inc. Assessors Parcel if227-011-09 11881 Highland Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA Ilearing, Uate: March 4, L992 7:30 PM City Council Chambers fU YUL A:r it EACii OF YOU: In accordance with Che Public Records Ac[ (lovernmen[ Code Section 6250 Iit. Seq., we hereby request copies of all o£ Che following items mentioned herein as Follows, to wit: (II 1'hc r.ntrrr and complete copy n} Che third party rn irn bursoment al;reeuum[ between City of Rancho Cucamonga, William Lynn Co., f.ha(fev High School District et al, covering Lark Drive and/or the. Southwest corner of Highland and Rochester in said Crty; (°) Alt f, I'.Il C:\ documents, California Environmental Quality Act Uo c.uments, cuvoring Lark Drive and/or Che 9ou[hwest corner of Ill ghlaml and Rochester in said Gi[y; 'i) ,AII plrurs, rnnsl ruction plans, desi /'. II plans, eny;incering pions for said pr o,lect nod/or projects being [he pans for [he cnnntruc H on of Lark Drive and/or the Southwest corner of Ili p,h Lrnd and Rochester in said City; Ms. Debra J. Adams February 28, 1992 Mr. Mike Olivier Page 2 (4) All plans and/or contracts for bid for construction thereof, being Lark Drive and/or the Southwest corner of Highland and Rochester in said Ci[y; (5) The entire and complete copy of the summary of the appraisal upon which [he City's offer to purchase the land for Lark Drive is based; AND (6) The entire and complete copy of the summary of the appraisal upon which the City's offer to purchase the land at the Southwest corner of Highland and Rochester is based. All of the items requested as set forth above are needed by us so that we may properly prepare for the above-referenced hearing. Your courtesy and cooperation in providing us with all of said items would 6e deeply appreciated, Please note that we need all of said items requested herein as soon as possible. The hearing is set for March 4, 1992; and time is, therefore, very short, In addition, please note [het we will pay for all copy costs, charges and fees in connection therewith. Just give us a call when you have the copies ready for us [o pick up, and we will pay you the copy charges, costs, and fees when we pick up the copies from you. I do hope to hear from you very soon, The earleir the better, for time is of the essence. March 4, 1992, is right around [he corner. / ~. ~' Since y ~ ~ ~ ~~ i ., ~ ~ ~ ~~ Vito Jd'G41to Francesco /%~ ~ /// Sec rp Sa ry-Treasurer for !/// Nick Devito, Inc. (714)984-5071 Y Y U C rl ~ ~ v ,+ a> .i C.n P U C 4 E = G '~ V m u u E ~ a ~ V u r, C C o: C C C c L U O ~ ~ E `J C u O N A'H S. U (G Y > ~' X J L v+V C G O e~ O C L aC U u v~C C h..rC q SU-+o.s ~ r y K, ~ S < ti~ `~' I 1~ r Y I ~ O. "t ; ~ Y .. ~ ~ Z ~ i i < Y h Y [` CITY COUNCIL RANCHO CVCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC RZCNT-OF-WAY FOR LARK ORI~E Date and Time: Wednesday, Harch 4, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Place: Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 APPEARANCES CITY Op RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL DENNIS L. STOUTS MAYOR WILLI AY J. ALEXANDEA~ COUNCILMEMBER CHARLES BVQUET~ COUNCILHEMBEA DIANE WI LLIAMS~ COONCILMEMeEA PAMELA J. WRIGHT~ COVNCILMEMBEA JACK LAH~ CITY MANAGER JAHES L. MARKMAN~ CITY ATTORNEY DEBRA J. ADAHS~ CITY CLERK City Council Meeting Items G1 and G2 Eminent Domain for Lark Drive March 4, 1992 MAYOR STOUT: Item G, Public Hearings. The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. ITEM 1, CONSIDERATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC RIGHT-A-WAY FOR LARK DRIVE FROM ITS EXISTING EASTERLY TE RMINVS TO ROCHESTER AVENUE AND RESOLUTION 92-057. Also ITEM 2, WHICH IS CONSIDERATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQVIRE PUBLIC-RIGHT-AWAY FOR LARK DRIVE FROM ITS EXISTING EAST^c RLY TERMINUS TO ROCHESTER AVENUE AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENL•E. Both items will be heard concurrent ly. MA. LAM: Mr. Mike Olivier from the Engineering Department will give this report. MR. OLIVIER: Thank you. Mr. Ma ycr and members of the Council, Items I and 2 pertain to our City acquiring the right-of-way that a developer, William Lyon, well maybe I first ought to explain for the moat of the people where the property lies, Here is Highland across here. Here's Base Line down here, and this ie Victoria Park Lane, antl Rochester Avenue and Mil liken's over here, antl the property in question is at the north side of the new Rancho Cucamonga High School. So it is right in here. It's called Lark Drive, and then there's a little piece of property up here that were doing because we're improving the intersection, and items on the Agenda, 1 and 2, pertain to acquiring right-of-way that a developer, the William Lyon Company, was unable to acquire for the construction of Lark Drive. And Item 2 also lnc lodes this little piece up here for a City's capital improvement project, antl both, all of, both of these, this antl this work here, is really, benefits i.he high ..^,chool. And the action adjacent to Lary. Drive is being pursued as stipulated in an agreement recorded in January 1988 betNeen the Ciia ffey School Oiat rict, the William i,yon Company, and the City of Aa ncho Cucamonga. Since the William Lyon Company was not successful in acquiring the ded icatiene from the landowners, it's these two pieces down here, the City has assumed this reepons Lbility. An offer of just compensation based on an intlependent appraisal was made to the property 2 City Council Meeting It ems G1 and G2 Eminent Domain foY Ldrk Drive March 4, 1492 owners in December 1991. To date the owner of APN 227-011-13 has not responded to the City's offer. The owner of APN 227-011-09 hoe met with the City at off but no agreement has been reached. However, negotiations are still open and continuing. In order to complete the improvements before the school's scheduled opening in September, it is necessary to enact, at thin time, a resolution declaring the public need and necessity to condemn this needed right-of-way to fulfill the City's obligation tc the Chaffey School District. Enactment of the reaolut ion does not preclude continuation of negotiations, They will continue on good faith with the property owners. That concludes my presentation. If there are any questions I will try [o answer them. MAYOR STOUT: Sn9t to clarift one thing. The word eminent domain ie always a scary term. With respect to this particular property here there are no reaitlences or anything that are going to be removed or in anyway destroyed or hampered or anything, is that correct? MR. GLIV IE R: There is a residence that sits about right here where my finger's at but it's quite a ways trom this corner here. That would be the only residence on this piece of property and this piece is vacant. MAYOR STOUT: Alright. M.R. MARKMAN: May I add something to this staff report, Mr. Mayor? A couple of things. First of all the purpose of the hearing, we do anticipate some teat imony because we've had correspondence from one of the parties. Purpose of the hearing is not to establish Eair market value or compensations. Mr. Olivier hoe said negct iations continue, sometimes they become more eerious when an eminent domain proceeding is filed, sometimes not, but the staff will continue to negotiate. We just haven't reached an agreement. The only purpose of the hearing i.s [o establish whether the property in question, which is deacr ibetl foe you, is necessary to generate the public impr oveme n^_ anCin paced. Th ie street not only is required, and the requirement ie coming on us because of the construction of the new high school, this et rest ie aligned per epecif is alignments already approved in conjunction with the Vletoria Commun Lty Plan and various amendments to those plans, to that plan going all the way back to 1901 3 City Council Meeting Items C1 and G2 Eminent Domain £or Lark Drlve March 4, 1992 through March of 1989. There have been environmental workupa on these plane, which include these street alignments, an original EIR as back ae far as 1981, and every time this alignment became more specific or there were amendments to the Community Plan there were environmental workupa afterwards including ehree other negative declaration processes. 5o there's been a lot of environmental work, a lot of thought about the location of this street. That ie the issue before you tonight, whether the public needed necessity requires this property to be acquired, whether it's planned in the manner compatible with the least private injury the greatest public good. We believe that your staff report shows that as well as all the other documents related to the Victoria Community Flan and the location of the high schoo i. MAYOR STOUT: AlY fight. MR. MARKMAN: I just wanted to narrow that issue in case we get into some tangential testimony tonight. MAYOR STOVT: Alright. Thank you Mr. Stickney. Public hearing is open. Any of the involved part tee or any other member of the public care to address the Council? MR. FRANCESCO: Good evening, my name is Vito Devito Francesco. T'm the seer et ary-treasurer for the property owner, Nick DeVit o, Incorporated, and this evening I brought with us Mr. Ken McVay from the law firm of Beat, Beat and Krieger from Rivera id e, and he hoe a few words to disease with you. MR. MCVAY: Thank you. I've prepared a written statement. It's a little bit lengthy and I don't know what the beat way fie to proceed. I can pass it out to you and give you -- MAYOR STOUT: Is there some reason why you did not submit that to us earlier? MR. MCVAY: Yes, I have just recently gotten involved in this matter and, we've gotten information as of yesterday, pursuant to Public Record Act request, that we will be addressing today and I'm prepared to paee out that at atemenc. There is no requirement for us to have a statement prepared in 4 City Council Meeting Items G1 and G2 Eminent Domain foe Lark Drive March 4, 3992 advance and submitted to you, but I do have a statement to circulate to you. I•m prepared to ei.t her read it or I'm prepared to just give you a summary and have it as part of the record. MAYOR STOUT: We would prefer that you have it mach part of the record then. MR. MCVAY: The property owner does cbject to the as opt ion o£ the reaolut ion of neceas ity at this time. There are a number of legal issues that I think that may have not been brought to your attention and I think you need to look at them. I think the staff hoe already referenced an agreement that was entered back in January of 1988. That agreement, in our view, pre een[e a problem for the entire eminent domain process. what that agreement basically was, was a three party agreement involving the Chaffey High School District, William Lyon Company and the City, and what was done in that agreement was that it basically said that William Lyon was going to be responsible for acquiring the right-of-way for Lark Drive. But what also was done in that agreement was that it stated that the coat of the acquisition of that property and the construction of that acyu is it ion was to be born by the property owner that is here before you today. Basically it ea id there is to be a reimbursement agreement in which the property owner is to pay, in essence, for the taking of its own property. There was also another condition imposed in that agreement which stated that the property was to 6e subject to dedication requirement iE the property, my client's property, was ever to be developed. At no time was the property owner ever given notice of that agreement. We have only Eound out about the details o£ that agreement just th ie weak pursuant to a Public Record Act request. That agreement has been referenced in negotiations, however. Wii Siam Lyon Company hoe said, "We want you to give us this property. We'll give you an offer based upon an appra iea 1, but we have to let you know that you are going to have to pay for it when the property ie developed." I know of no such kind of arrangement before. I've never heard of 5 City Council Meeting It ems cl and G2 Eminent Domain for Lark Drive March 4, 1992 an arrangement where a property owner, basically has a gun put to hie head, end says, by the way, you're going to have to pay Eor the bullet, and that ie what is happened in this instance. Now there is an obligation. An obligation to negotiate in good faith. There's an obligation under Section 7260 of the Government Code to negot iota in good faith and to make an offer of just compensation based upon an independent appraisal. The appraisal was prepared by a developer, and the negotiation process hoe all been conditioned upon the owner be in9 told that hie property ie going to be condemned and he's going to have Lo pay for that condemnation proceeding, and for the acquisition of the property he ie asked to sell. That violates every notion of due process. It violates also very basic principals, case law and the eminent domain law. The Norm Slau son case makes it very clear that if [here's an agreert~ent that is entered prior to the commencement of eminent domain, which basically commits the public agency to engage or initiate eminent domain proceedings, a resolution of neceas ity that ie adopted par avant to each an agreement iE invalid and will be at ruck down by a court. I've given the ca ae citation for your City Attorney to review. We have that situation here. we also have a number of other problems with that, with the adoption of a resolution under these circumstances. Basically what we have here, ae I said, a precomittment to condemn based upon this agreement that has already been referenced by the staff, and ie referenced in the resolution of nece~stty. We also have a problem here In that there is a statutory and legal mandatory duty on the part of any public ant iCy before it adopts a resolution of neceas ity to weigh judiciously the pros and cone of the adoption of a resolution. Case law is very clear on this. You have to look at alternative sites, you have to look at alternatives to the project, you have to weigh Chase, you have to be engaged in a process of looking at specif icaliy what the impact is on the public interest, and what the Impact is as £ar as private injury. The staff report that hoe been presented here, and we've had an opporkunity to review it in advance, is very skimpy. It doesn't do that. There is no discussion of alternative e itea~ ro discussion of alternative locations, and that is an obligation under 6 City Council Meeting Items G1 and G2 Eminent Domain far Lark Drive March 4, 1992 one of the findings that has to be made as far as the resolution of neceaeiiy. There is actually no evidence from what I can tell, at least as far as the staff report is concerned, to support those findings, and again that is going to be a basis for invalidating the resolution. An interesting consequence of this entire arrangement, which fie really a unique animal here as far as this three party agreement that didn't involve the property owner, as far as the taking of hie property, is that it also, this property is being acquired for another public entity. It's really being required for the benefit of a school district. Well the eminent domain law, and I cite the code section in my statement, makes it very clear that if you have some kind of joint agreement for the acquisition and condemnation of property, the party that is 6enef fitted, that who is really acquiring that, the one who fie really going for the public project here, has to be nametl as a party to that proceeding. We're not aware of any adoption of a resolution by the high school district, and we're nut aware of it being a party to any prospective eminent domain proceeding, and that will be a 6asia for a challenge in court. We've also had an opportunity, just again pursuant to a Public Records Act requese, to look at the scope of the project. The scope of the project, as far as the construction plans are concerned, don't match the description of the project as intlicated in the resolution and I discussed that in my statement as well. Now I've heard a statement that the California Environmental Quality Act has been complietl with. We11 I'm not certain about that. We've made a Public Records request as far as the documentation on that. We asked Eor all environmental review documents with respect to Lark Drive itself. The only documentation that was given to us had to do with the corner piece on Rochester and Righland. We were never provided any documentation showing that any environmental review has been done as far as Lark Drive itself concerned. In fact it should have heen done because there is a residence on this property. There is a taking that will affect the residents on that property. There's horees on that property, there's a training trail on that property, which will be disturbed by the Cakiny here and t-hat hasn't been add r.ee sed at all by the 7 City Council Meeting Items G1 and G2 Eminent Domain for Lark Drive March 4, 1992 staff, and it should have also been addressed in the process in the environmental review process. Case law again, there are cases on that which I've cited, make it clear that the California Environmental Quality Act must be complied with before the power of eminent domain can be exercised. Now I've already mentioned that under the Government Code there is a requirement to engage in good faith negotiations to make an offer, antl so forth, and what we have indicated already is that that the property owner has been told that he hoe to pay for his cwn property. And I want to make this olear, I don't have thin in my statement, but I do want to quote a letter in the negotiation oroceea, and it.'s a letter from William Lyon Company to the property owner, ^the acquisition of the easement right-of-way, as well as the coat incurred Eor the design and construction of Lark Drive that fronts the Nick DeV ito, Snco rporat ed property is subject to reimbursement. Such re imburaement to the William Lyon Company will be paid at the time of development of the Nick Devito, Inc., Incorporated property.^ That's a quote from the negotiations that have been ongoing. I don't know how any of you would feel if you were a property owner, where you would have to, say, be in the position o£ negotiations, and being to 1d, oh yes, you can sell your property, but you're going to have to pay Eor the sale of your own property. It•a unprecedented, and I don't think a judge ie going to like it. But we're not spoiling fora fight. We're not interested In a fight. what we want, the property owner wants, is an opportunity to have a truly meaningful time to negotiate, and all we request is that the resolution of necessity hearing be continued for the period of four weeks so that the property owner can sit down and have a truly meaningful opportunity to negotiate. It hasn't been given that opportunity. I don't think we're asking for very much, and under these circumstances where basically, as we said, a gun has been put to the property owner's head, we want that gun removed. All we want is to be able [o say that, yes, we can negotiate a des 1, and no, that we're not going [o have to pay for it in the end. If you have any questions I'd be happy to answer th sin. MAYOR ETOIIT: Thank you. 8 City Council Meeting Items G1 and G2 Eminent Domain for Lark Drive March 4, 1992 MA. MCVAY: I have one further request. MAYOR STOUT: Yes. MR. MCVAY: In the event that the City does decide to adopt a resolution of necessity, Z noticed that the staff report does request that there be authorization for an order Eor poe sees ion on three days notice. It's an extraordinary remedy. Give only three days before construction begins. I request that if you are going to authorize that, and at least as a courtesy to the property owner, that we be given at leant twenty four hours notice before the City goes to the court to apply for ouch an order. Thank you. MA. FRANCESCO: My name again is Vito DeV ito Francesco and I would just like to make a couple of brief comments. The statement was made about the Victoria Planned Community. This evening you gentlemen, ladies and gentlemen, honoretl a man by the name of Joe DiZOriO. At the very beginning when Joe came to my office and he asked me to become part of the Victoria Plan, to put our property into the Victoria Plan, I told him, Joe, no we want to stay out of it, and if you'll look at your pac ke[ you'll see some hatch marks on our property, and the packet says not a part of Victoria Plan. We were not a part of the Victoria Plan. Joe knew that, he agreed to that, he left ua out of it. out of all the planning stages that were going through the Victoria Plan, we were not a part of i[, and that's documentation proof positive, At some later time, way back, maybe about a year ago or a little more than a year ago, you passed a resolution saying that the out pieces were going to become part of the Victoria Plan, and we wire one of the out pieces, and I appeared before the Cicy council and I made as strong an argument as passible saying that we wanted to be left out. That we had this understanding with Joe DiIOr. io. We were not a part of the Victoria Plan. We wanted to stay out of i.t. It was agreed that we were going to be left out o£ it. But this body in its wisdom said no you've got to beccme part of it and you passed a reao lotion to force us to become part of it. That was involuntary on our part. We objected from the very beginning and we were left out of i!, but we were Eorced into it. So by forcing us into it we become part o£ it, but that is nor. voluntary, and it's not fair to 9 City Council Meeting It ems G3 and G2 Eminent Domain for Lark Drive March d, 3992 force us into something and then take advantage or u6e that against ue, by forcing us to became part of something, and then saying because you're part of it this will affect you. Now, I just wanted to make that clear for the record. The other thing as far as the disturbance ie concerned, if anybody takes a look at the property, the property ie used ae a horse ranch. The man that`s on there craina thoroughbreds. He hoe two training tracks. One by the house and one chat goes up and down the hills, ae he calla it, and that goes all the way from the other training track all the way down to the bottom of the property. There's a horseshoe or eul-de-sac type turn and then he brings the horses back and he trains them by going up and down. 5o there will be some disturbance oC the person who's on the property now. So Z wanted to make that clear. The other thing ie that there are letters of commu nicetion that right, from the very beginning, the people that wanted Lark Drive, the William Lyon Company, wanted to be repaid for whatever they paid for the land and far putting the street in. Not only for purchasing the land, but for all [he construction coats that go around that. So whether they pay ue ten dollars or a million dollars, we're going to have to give it back to them. It's just a question of time, and that's the way the negot iatione, if you call them negotiations, that's what the disco es ions have been going on, and I believe that that's patently unfair. There are also letters regarding the corner, that Che City wants Che corner free. They didn't make, they made an offer which was in conjunction with the other offee regarding La rk~ but that was aC a later time. The first two letCe re from the city is that the City wants the corner free, and I can show you the letters. So thac's the way, i£ you call these negotiations, they are not really negot iation e, it's kind of a donation. And then when they construe their offer, their offer is based at the same price for the corner basically per foot, per square foot, as Lark, and corners are, generally speaking, worth more than ins ids property. So it's just not real fair the way that process ie geing on. 30 City Council Meeting Items G1 and C2 Eminent Domain for Lark Drive March 4, 1992 Another thing is that the appraisal quotes, and i use a quote, because on the face of the appraisal if you look at the Front sheet it Bays prepared by the William Lyon Ccmpany, and the letters o£ communications between the William Lyon Company and Dr. Bower, is that that appraisal is being done for the Lyon Company and the aower benefit, and it's not really done for market value, it's done for, to give Dr. Bower a level of comfort, a reference point. Now the now if they're using that appraisal, they're trying to use that as market value for the Devito property, and that to me is not fair. What I think needs to be done in order to be fair is to have an impartial independent appraiser appraise the DeV ito property and to appraise the corner property. Not to have the William Lyon Company prepare an appraisal and then use that to try to establish a price, when it had nothing to do with the Devito property. So I think that that's another problem that needs to be taken care of. In addition you have a forty acre piece of property where the school is being built. You have Victoria Park Lane on the bottom and you have Rochester on the east side. And then you have forty acres that's owned by the ac hool district. Now you're trying to tell me that you can't have another road within that forty acres to service the high school, when you have Victoria Park Lane on one side and Rochester on the other. I mean it's inconceivable that you can't fit another road in there. In fact if you'll ge out there and look, they have another road almost made which is south of the property line along the side of the fence that the trucks use to get in and out of the Property now. 5o I don't really Chink that it's needed. All you have to do is go out there and take a look. As far as the corner's ccnce reed, the traffic light, I can't understand why the traEf is can's be directed down Rochester to Victoria Park Lane. As far as having a traffic light on the corner of Rochester and Highland, you have another traffic light just east of there. I think it's about one tenth of a mile, and you have a traffic light on Milliken. There's no traffic coming down from Banyan, from Banyan on Rochester to li igh land. 5o I don't see what the need is for a traffic light there. If Rochester was paved from Banyan to Highland, maybe you'd have a reason to say, well, there's a lot of traffic. Rut 11 City Council Meeting Items G1 and C2 Eminent Domain for Lark Drive Harsh 4, 1992 there's no traffic that way and you already have a light a tenth of a mile down the street. So I really don't think that the traffic light there is going to be of any use. MA. MCVAY: Z would just like to make one concluding remark, and that ie that the, the summary of the appraisal, when the City made the letter of offer, there waa no summary of appraisal attached to the letter, and I think that'a a patent defect. we had to request a summary of appraisal later. Dut it was not attached to the offer, and that I think is a real defect in the offer that came from the City. In addition, the quotes the appraiser, cr the appraisal, it was done Eor the Lark, it wasn't done for the corner. But the summary of appraisal refers to the corner. So there's a question if any appraisal at all was really done for the corner. So in conclusion, all I requ set is that you appoint an independent impartial appraiser to do an appraisal of Lark and of the corner. Don•t use quotes and appraisal, if it is an appraisal, that's tlone by a person who wants to purchase. I mean it doesn't make sense. It•s like the fax taking care of the chicken coop. So I'm not trying to take advantage of anybody and I'm not trying to stop anything, all I'm trying to do is to make a fair situation out of this mixed up situation, and I think the way to do it is to coat inue this for four weeks, appoint an appraiser, and take a gcod solid look at it because so far that hasn't been done, Thank you. MAYOA STOUT: Is there anyone else? MA. MAAKMAN: Mr. Mayor, before you close this hearing, there have been a number of issues raised which we would like to look at., I've talked to Mr. O'Neil about this. I am not indicating to you that there's merit in any of these contentions. I am indicating to you that although you've heard staff and a Eew other people accused of doing things at the last minute, obviously our good friends at best, Best and Krieger didn't see fic to make any contact or raise these issue until the night of the hearing. But I do think it's worthwhile for the pa rC ies to epe nd the next couple of weeks looking at some of these i99u es, and Mr. McVay ought to go back to the paxtners in his firm and ask what Le Beet, Best and Krieger doing l:e re representing somebody potentially adverse to the City when they presently represent this body with respect to bond work, and It 12 City Council Meeting 2tems G1 and G2 Eminent Domain for Lark Drive March 4, 1992 represented this body in the past with respect to other work, and I think my good friend Bill DeWOlfe and some other people ought to punch up their conflicts program to see whether they ought to really be involved in Chia. But aside from that, and if they do feel they can be involved, I agree that if we take a hard look at some of these things we could probably work some of it out, if not we'll go forward. So I would suggest you continue, leave the hearing open, continue for two weeks to see if we can resolve some of these matters. MAYOR STOVT: Before we do that I want to ask Mr. O'Neil a question. That high school is under construction. It's almost to the po irit where they're going to have to put these roads in or they're not going to be ready by opening of school in September, including that traffic light. In spite of the fact that some people may not think you need a traffic light, anybody Chat has driven on Highland knows that with that many children going to that high school, that there's a traffic light needed in order to get them safely in and out of there. Anybody that woultl suggest otherwise simply is trying to do this for eome other reason other than safety. MR. O'NEIL: Yes Mr. Mayor, I would agree with you whole heartedly on that also. We are preparing plans for the extension of Rochester. MA. MARKMAN: Mr. Mayon I agree on, I mean [he issues about the Norm 5l au eon case, I think we can either iron out or fix. The issue about EIR, I t hin:< they're incorrect. The Lssue ie the City is taking a at rest, the fact that it's in conjunction with Che construction of a high school doesn't mean it's going to be a school district et cert. It's a City street. Se most of these issues I think we could deal with. In fact we just haven't had an opportunity to speak to Mr. McVay about them, and he probably hasn't had the opportunity to do otherwise himself. I don't know how long he•s been working on this. We've only heard from Mr. Devito in the past. MAYOR STOUT: The question is there see two other ... MR. M.ARI(MAN: There are some other questions, however, about the structure of that original agreen'~ent, three party agreement, with which I may in part concur with Mr. McVay, and have conveyed such sr,atemente to the 13 City Council Nesting Items Gl and G2 Eminent Domain for Lark Drive March 4, 1992 staff in the past, and Lf that's really the hang-up on reaching an amicable agreement, we probably, probably could do it, if that's really what it ie. MAYOR SPOUT: The question I'm asking you again is, is this going Co cause some type of a burden or harm to that high school? MR. O'NEIL: Yes Mr. Mayor and members of Council. If the issue ie delayed fora significant amount of time, the answer to that question is yes, and it wii1. They are geared up for opening in September. The issue of this road and the reason that we are asking for the urgency, and we have been in negotiations for some time, this is not a week or two week deal, the correspondence goes way back, and we're not opposed to negotiation, we're clearly willing to do chat, involving getting other appraisals, whatever it takes to come to some agreement. These negotiations, and in talking to the people, hoe not been an easy process but we are willing to sit down and move forward with that. The issue again is the school is on very, very tight timeframe. I talked to Dr. 5u nde1l today, she was very concerned about that, that these things move forward. They're doing all their planning for September. The road has become a critical issue, We cannot get the water line in to service the property, to complete the water line loop. We cannot, all the bus traffic for the school is going to be coming up Lark Drive, ve it is a very clearly important element that this proceed, COUNCILMEMBER WAIGHT: What is £our weeks going to do to it1 MR. MAAKMAN: Two weeks is all we're asking. COVNCILMEMBEP. WRLGHT: O.A., what is two weeks gc ing to do7 MR. O'NEAL: I don't believe the two weeks would be a problem, especially if we cou ltl get same acqu ieaceace that we wculd not get an objection to the immediate possession or, a timely basis. If we had to wait a month and then wait ninety days for immediate possess icn, they are not going to be able to open that school in September, I can guarantee you. They will not be able to do it. So we need... MR. MARI(MAN: We11 iE we find ourvelves in that position Ln two weeks, or if we think we may end up, then we'll just have to let the lawyers have fun with this. But I do think from what I hea rtl tonight, and I understand some 14 City Council Meeting Items G1 and G2 Eminent Domain far Lark Drive N.a rch 4, 1992 of the issues raised by Mr. McVay, and T think they certainly bear some discussion, and it may actually accelerate the process. If we can't get it done, then eo be it. Rut I think two weeks is in order. A month puts ua at a little disadvantage, and we do need the public improvement to take children safely to school. That's just a fact of life. MA. O'NEIL: We were targeting having the right-of-way no later than April first because the contractor is prepared to immediately move in ae soon as that property becomes a public street. They are prepared to move in and get on with their job. MAYOR STOUT: So they can't even geC a wateY line t0 the school, right? MR. O'NEIL: We have, and Mr. Devito did ment iOn the roadway that is conveniently south of his property. It's there because we can't get on hie property. If we could get on his property to build the road, we would have done it. We can't, we're using a temporary road that's on the school site that obviously isn't going to be there when rte school's built. So that'e why that road ie there. It's for ingress and egress to get people in and out of there, but it's not where its supposed to 6e. MAYOR STOUT: There's another point that I think ought to be made. This city did not Bite that schoul there. The school district decides where they think high schools ought to be located, and then they come to the City and indicate that we need to do something in order to make the tea Ef is circulae ion work. So we did not set thi& up in collusion wit0 the school district. MR. O'NET L: We are also moving forward. We are prepared to put out and advertise a prgject for Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. So with the little piece of right-ot-way that's needed for the aig nal, and clearly that signal is needed. It's also a state highway, so wr still have to deal with the state on this issue, and time is slipping away from us, and these negot iat ionsr as you can see from tonight, are not easy. MAYOR STOUT: That other traffic liyht~ by the way, down there, is the entry way into r,he rock crusher. 15 city Council Meeting items G1 and G2 Eminent Domain Eor Lark Drive Harch 4, 199y MR. O'NEIL: Yes, that's correct. Signal takes quite a bit of time to get it inetaLled, so it'll be... MAYOA STOUT: They take four or five mo nt he to install once you get started. Alright does Council desire to continue this for two weeks? COVNCI LMEMBER ALE%ANDER: Yes. MAYOR STOUT: Someone will make such a motion? COUNCILMEMBEA ALE%ANDER: So moved. MAYOR STOUT: Moved by plexarder, seconded by Williams to continue the public hearing as opened for two weeks. Indicate your votes please. THE CZTY CLERK: Motion carried unanimously, five, zero. 16 If ~~ li WEST SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY COALITION AB 939 -Solid Waste Generation Studies For the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, Chino, Montclair and Unincorporated Western San Bernardino County December 1991 Final Report SCS ENGINEERS - AB 939 SOLID WASTE GENERATION STUDIES WEST SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY COALITION Prepared for: Cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, Chino, Montclair, and Unincorporated Western San Bernardino County Prepared by: SCS Engineers 37l I Long Beach Boulevard, Ninth Floor Long Beach, California 90807 (310) 426-9544 December 1991 Pile No. 190190 .e he S[5 ENGINEERS - CONTENTS Sediou Paee 1 Introduction ..............................................I-1 Scope of Work ............................................ 1-1 Study Objectives ................................ . .......... 1-I Background .................................. . ...........l-2 2 Solid Waste Iisposal Character'vation Study ..........................:-1 Introduction ............................ . .................2-1 Background Information ......................................2-2 ProjeM Approach ..........................................2-5 Data Analysis ..................................... . ...... 2-10 3 Solid Waste INversiom Characterization Study .........................3-I Inttoduction ..............................................3-1 Background ................... . ..........................3-I Projoct Approach ..........................................3-2 Data Analysis .............................................3-2 4 Waste Gemeratiom Forecasts ....................................4-I Introduction ..............................................4-1 Methodology .............................................4-1 Data Amalysis .............................................4-3 5 Conclusions ............................................ . .5-1 Solid Waste Disposal Study ............ . ............... . .......5-I Solid Waste Diversion Study ...................................5-3 Solid Waste Diversion and Disposal Data ............................ 5-4 Aocendices A Definitions of Waste Types B Pield Date C Waste Diversion Survey Fonn SCS ENGINEERS - SRCTION 1 L1"fRODUCTION SCOPE OF WORK This report, prepared on behalf of the Cities of Chino, Montclair, Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, and parts of the unincorporated area of Western San Bernardino County, contains [he thmz components of the sofid waste generation study required by AB 939, AB 1820, and the appropriate implementation guidelines issued by the California Integrated Waste Manage- ment Board (CIWMB). These components are as follows: • A waste disposal characterization study to identify the various constituents of the waste stream currently disposed of in landfills. • A waste diversion study which quant~es existing diversion. • A 15-year waste generation projection. STLDY OB,(EC1'IV&S State regulations require that waste be analyzed according to its source and the category of components. "Source" indicates whether generators ate residential, commercial, industrial, or "other" in origin. For the purposes of this study, sources of waste generation are defined as follows: ENGINEERS - • Residential -Wastes generated by single-family dwellings, including duplexes and triplexes. • Commercial -Wastes generated by retail stores, businesses, offices, commercial warehouses, educational facilities, and governmental offices. • Industrial -Wastes generated by mechanized manufacturing facilities, factories, n:fineries, and construction and demolition operations. • Other - Ciry/County-generated green wastes, strut maintenance, self-haul vehicles, etc. Components of waste generation indicate material categories and types. A list of the categories and types is shown in Table t-l, and definitions are provided in Appendix A. Data relating to components an: reported as percentages (by weight) of each individual source. Towanf this end, the waste generation study is designed and implemented in such a way that samples of the waste stream are chosen to be statistically representative of each individuafjurisdiction. This study provides background data with which to gauge success in meeting the require- ments of AB 939 and AB 1820, and to provide information on wastes which can most productively be targeted for separation and recycling. Other information can effectively point to components which are neither reusable nor recyclable, and which can therefore Ix; examined in the context of source reduction. BACKGROUND According to the California Departmem of Finance figures for L990, the populations of the five jurisdictions included in this study ate as follows: ~c I-2 SCS ENGINEERS - P i ^ Percent of Total Unincorporated County 68,281 20.4 Rancho Cucamonga 114,954 34.3 Chino 59,682' 17.8 Upland 64,973 19.4 Montclair 27.110 ~ 8.1 Total 334,937 100.0 '" 1990 U.S. Census. The study area contains primarily residential and commercial establishments. The ratio of single-family dwellings to [oral housing units ranges from 64 to 75 percent, and averages 70 percent for the five jurisdictions. California Department of Finance distribution of housing by type is as follows: Percent of Single-Family Multifamily Mobile Single-Family Dwelling Units Dwe 'pg nits Hnmes ~ Units Rancho Cucamonga 26,953 8,423 963 36,339 74 Chino 11,495 3,697 473 15,665 73 Upland 16,292 8,490 648 25,430 64 Montclair ,x,784 2.620 S,~ 8.925 Total 60,524 23,230 2,605 86,359 70 [inincoroorated County Area The unincorporated area of West San Bernardino County is primarily rural in character. A large percenuge of the land is dedicated to hvestock and agriculture. The majority of the population is centered around the Chino Hills Development. The 1990 population for the unincorporated area is 68,300. Of this total, approximately 48,000 reside in Chino Hills; the I-J S[S ENGINEERS - remaining population is dispersed throughout eight other areas ranging in size from 150 to 5,800 persons. Rancho Cunmoona The City of Rancho Cucamonga, the largest of the five jurisdictions, was incorporated in 1977 by voters of three previously distinct communities (Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda). Housing pressures (the mpidly rising cost of homes for the working population of the Los Angeles basin) resulted in rapid development of this City, which is located in relatively close proximity to the downtown Los Angeles Civic Center. From a population of 50.000 in 1975, the City of Rancho Cucamonga nearly doubled in population over the next 4 years, and averaged a growth rate of almost 8 percent per year between 1979 and 1987. The City is primarily residential at the present time. Land use figures from the City's 1989 General Plan indicate that, in 1987, 8,000 of the City's 22,700 acres were dedicated to residential use (36 petcenq; commercial development consumed 450 acres (2 percent); and industrial development utilized 2,000 acres (9 percent). Forty-five percent of the available land within the City limits remained undeveloped in t987. Recent commuter trends indicate that, of the entire labor force living in Rancho Cucamonga, only about 10 percent also work in the City. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) calculates that the population of Rancho Cucamonga is expected to grow at a rate of approximately 4.6 percent per year to a total of about 127,000 by the year 2010, when full buildout is likely to occur. At that time, the City expects 56 percent of its available land to be dedicated to residential use, 6 percent to commercial use, and 23 percent to industrial use, with the remainder devoted primarily to roads, schools, and parks.. Chino The City of Chino, tike other communities in West San Bernardino County, experienced a period of rapid growth, its population doubling every 10 years between 1950 and 1980. x° 1-4 SCS ENGINEERS - Since 1980, the City's growth has slowed, averaging 4.0 percent per year. Various sources predict that growth rates will remain more or less constant through the year 2000, and possibly increase thereafter. Population at buildout will probably M around 70,500. Residents of the City are generally young; 70 percent of the population is under the age of 34 (the largest age group falling between the ages of 25 and 34). Land use figures from a 1991 Iand Use Survey show that currendy, 40 percent of the developed land within the City's limits is dedicated to residential use; 4.1 percent to commercial use; I8.5 percent to industry; and 20 percent to agriculture. At buildout, these figures are projected to M 41 percent esidentai, 5.2 percent commercial, and 22 percent industrial; agriculture will have Men totally phased out by that time. The California Institute for Men, a state prison facility, is~located within City limits and occupies 2,537 acres of land. At pmsent, the largest employers in the City are the dairy industry, government agencies, the School District, and the California Institute for Men. Economics are dominated by the retail sales group, which contributed more than twice the sales tax revenues generated by the manufactutinglindus[rial sector. The largest segment of the retail sales group appears to M automobile dealers and supplies. The largest segments of the industrial sector are construction contractors, lumber, tight industrial equipment, and office equipment manufacturers. The City of Upland, which was incorporated in 1906, experienced modest growth through the late fifties, but exhibited growth rates averaging 13.6 percent per year between 1960 and 1984. Since that time, growth has averaged approximately 3.6 percent. Buildout is expected around the year 2000, at which time various estimates place the population at somewhere around 70,000. The City occupies an area of 15 square tulles (9,700 acres), of which less than 1,000 acres are currently undeveloped. Montclair The City of Montclair, covering 5.3 square miles, is the smallest of the jurisdictions for which this study was prepared. According to the 1983 Montclair General Plan, the present ~' 1-5 SCS ENG~NfERE - population of 27,110 is expected to grow at a rate of approximately 1.2 percent per year, to 30,500 by the yeaz 2000. The City is residential and commercial in character and serves mainly to provide affordable housing for workers commuting to jobs in the Los Angeles area. The City is home to the Montclair Plaza Shopping Mall, a complex which includes five major department stores and nearly 200 specialty shops and restaurants, There is very little industrial development within the City Limits. l -6 an .~~ ~ ~ a ~ " 3 m . o ~ a ~{ ~ 0 3 ~ o ~ ~ o~ y p~ , a~ , ov xsa u. J z8 ~ ~'~ ~ "y Pb ~ 8„ 8 m ~~m m o ma 3a F5B 'c '.a `o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9k iC a3 ~> ? e a „ ` a ~ u zP ~ ~~ ~ au r ~~ u: e o ~ e ` ~ g 3 ~ C 6 ° ~ FF qy g $, C y ~ ~ ~ a ~ 5 ~ y 'Z y ^ y ~$ K O p V u Z CO q S i ~ ~-~ 5:5 FNG~NEERS - SECTION 2 SOLID WA5TE DISPOSAL CHARACTERIZATION STLaY LNTRODL'CTION A solid waste disposal characterization study was performed for the following jurisdictions in west San Bernardino County: unincorporated areas of west San Hemardino County, Rancho Cucamonga, Chino, Upland, and Montclair. The purpose of the study was to estimate, for each jurisdiction, the quantities and types of wastes generated by residential, commercial, industrial, and other sources that are disposed ta permitted landfills. The characterization study is based on the results of a 10-day quantitative field analysis which included manually sorting representative refuse samples according to the sotid waste types identified in this report. The field sorting was conduced at the Milliken landfill in late January/early Pebnrary 1991. The waste disposal characterization was performed in accordance with AB 939, AB 1820, and the Planning Guidelines issued by the CIWMB. 2-1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Refuse Colleetlon and D'coosal Private Refuse Disposal Companies-- SCS ENGINEERS - The majority of wastes generated by residents and businesses in the five jurisdictions ate collected and disposed by private companies. The following is a list of disposal companies serving each jurisdiction: Jurisdiction Unincorporated Areas of San Bernardino County Rancho Cucamonga Chino Upland Montclair Disposal Comnanv Westem Waste Industries Universal Disposal Service Duran Environmental Rancho Disposal Western Waste Industries Yukon Disposal Rancho Disposal Western Waste Industries Western Waste Industries Rosta Hauling Monte Vista Disposal Modem Disposal SCS surveyed these companies and obtained information on solid waste services [hey provide to the jurisdictions. Survey questions were specific to those wastes collected solely within a particular jurisdiction. In addition, SCS personnel visited the disposal companies to confirm survey information and to obtain specific facts regarding their collection mutes (i.e., account types, trvcklroate numbers, route boundaries, collection frequency, etc.). Table 2-l provides annual waste disposal rates, per jurisdiction, for residential, commercial, and industrial sources served by the disposal companies. +4 L-Z Other CoRection/Disposal Sources-- ENGINEERS - Some wastes generated within each of the five jurisdictions are hauled directly to landfills by the general public (home owners, small businesses, contractors, landscapers, etc.). We have tanned these wastes "self-haul." According ro information provided by NorCal (operators of the Milliken landfill), self-haul disposal contributes approximately 4 percent, by weight, to the [oral amount of wastes received at the landfill. This figure is based on the following information provided by the opemmr: • A total of 6,700 self-haul vehicles vse the landfill during any given month. • Approximately 700 pounds of waste per self-haul vehicle are disposed in the landfdl. (This translates to a total of 2,345 tons per month). • An average of 53,000 tons of wastes is Eeceived at the landfill each month. The following annual disposal rates assume that self-haul wastes contribute 4 percem to the overall wastes of each jurisdiction: Self-Haul Disposal Jurisdiction (tons cer vearl San Bernardino Unincorporated 3,120 Rancho Cucamonga 5,800 Chino 2,880 Upland 2,880 Montclair 1,200 Other waste generation sources in the five jurisdictions include park and stEeet maintenance. and tree trimming services (collectively referred to as "City Services"). This information. which was provided to SCS by the jurisdictions, is presented below. 2-3 SCS ENGINEERS - Jurisdiction City/County Disposal (tons cer veazl San Bernardino Unincorporated Rancho Cucamonga Chino Upland Montclair Not Available 2,90() 2,130 500 750 Based on the disposal company survey, information provided by the jurisdictions, and NorCal, SCS prepared estimates of the quantifies of wastes, by source, that each jurisdiction disposes in permitted Iandfdls annually. This information is provided in Table 2-I and is given in terms of weight (tons). Note that "Other" waste sources include sell-haul and city services. The total waste disposal rates presented in Table 2-1 correspond favorably to disposal rates found N previous SCS waste generation studies. The waste disposal rates for the jurisdic- tions range from 6 to 7 pounds per person per day. Disposal DeStinatioos- Refuse collated by haulers serving all west San Bernardino County jurisdictions is disposed at the Milliken landfill located m Ontario. Seasonal Variations Based on information provided to SCS during interviews with disposal company representa- tives, seasonal variations in waste generation within the five jurisdictions are not significant. When they do occur, they ate most noticeable in the residential and commercial (i.e., retaip SeC[OIS. Potential increases in wastes generated from the residential sector are attributable to home improvements during the spring, and to greater consumer spending in the winter. Disposal z': 2.4 SCS ENGINEERS - company estimates for the percentage increase in wastes generated during these seasons Fanged from 5 to 15 percent for the five jurisdictions. Potential increases in wastes generated from the commercial retail sectors are attributed to increased purchasing during the Christmas holidays. Estimates of percentage increases in wastes during these holiday; wen: not obtained from the disposal companies. Seasonal variations in waste generation do not seem to ocour in the commercial sector (other than retail) or in the industrial sector. According to area haulers, the quantities of wastes generated by these sources do not vary appreciably during the course of the year. Any variations would tend to be a function of the local, regional, or natlonal economy rather than the seasons. The greatest seasonal change in waste composition and volume is caused by variations in growth and disposal of green waste. San Bemarclino County has ayear-round growing season, therefore, green waste is disposed of N generally equal quantities through- out the year. For this study, the jurisdictions have identified only one season and have conducted a single field sampling program that is considered representative of solid wastes generated, diverted, and disposed in the jurisdictions. Furthermore, it should be noted that the time frame within which jurisdictions in California must complete their waste generation studies does no[ allow for multiple-season waste chatactcrizations. PROTECT APPROACH Waste ~isuosal CharaMerisation Proeram In accordance with AB 939 guidelines, a field program was designed and implemented which quantitatively characterized the waste sources of the fvejurisdictions in West San Bernardino County. The program involved identifying residential, commercial, and industrial waste sources, determining the number of samples required per waste source and jurisdiction, 2-5 Sts ENGINEERS - preselecting waste di sal tracks/routes (loads) for field analyses, and sorting the preselect- ed loads. As stated in the Refuse Collection/Disposal portion of this report, SCS surveyed refuse disposal companies which serve the five jurisdictions in west San Bernardino County. It was evident from these surveys that disposal companies' collection routes ate based primarily on factors such as account location, account pickup time, franchise boundaries, economics, and type of disposal bin used (3-cubic-yard bins, which are collected by fmntcnd loading (FEL) tracks, are generally used by most commercial, industrial, and multifamily residential accounts). Except for single-family residential areas, mutes are not generally based on the type of waste source collected. Therefore, commercial, industrial, and multifamily residen- tial wastes are often picked up by the same FEL track. ident~cation of commercial and industrial waste sources for each jurisdiction was accom- plished by reviewing mute information with representatives of the disposal companies, and determining which routes, or tracks, served primarily commercial or industrial accounts. A mute was deemed to be commercial if at least 70 percent of the accounts it serviced were commercial. The same was tme for the identification of industrial sources. It was not possible to identify mutes consisting primarily of multifamily residential wastes, as this waste source did not constitute more than 5 percent of any one FII, truck load. Since most of the residential collection routes within the five jurisdictions service single- family residential accounts only, identification of this waste source was relatively st~aightfor- ward. Businesses utilizing roll-off bins were classified as being either commercial or industrial, based on AB 939 definitions and disposal company information regarding the particular account. A good separation exists between commercial and industrial waste sources using roll-off bins, as the bins contain wastes that are from one source only. Hence, identification of commercial and industrial waste sources from these businesses aas also relatively straight- forward. z~: 2-6 tiumber of Loads AnalvzFFd SCS ENGINFFgS - The number of refuse samples analyzed during the field program was detemtined by the following: • Relative percentage of residential, commercial, and industrial wastes contained in a particular jurisdiction's overall waste stream. • Method of refuse collection. In general, sampling routes which serve multiple accounts is preferable to sampling those serving only one account (assuming that the accounts on a given route are predominantly the same waste source type). For example, it is preferred to sample afront-end loading truck which collects wastes from many accounts rather than to sample a load from one account (i. e., an account using atoll-off container). However, many industrial and commercial businesses in the five jurisdictions utilize roll-off containers as waste receptacles. Samples from roll-off bins provide precise information on waste types disposed by a pa.Kicular business. Failure to sample these businesses would exclude an essential element of the business sector. Therefore, both FII, and roll-off routes were selected to reflect a representative cross section of the business populations in the fivejurisdicflons. The formula for normal approximation is listed N the AB 939 guidelines (A. L. Klee and D. Canuth, "Sample Weights in Solid Waste Composition Studies," American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, Volume 96, August 1970). According to Klee and Cartuth's formula for approximation, using a level of precision of 5 percent, a minimum of six samples should be taken from residential waste sources, and no less than seven samples from commercial and industrial waste sources. The number of samples is based on the waste category which is expected to conMbute the largest percentage 2-7 SCS ENGINFFxS - to that waste source. In the case of residemial waste sources, a value of 30 percent paper was used. A value of 35 percent paper was used for commercial waste sources, and a value of 35 percent non-paper organics was used for industrial waste sources, The percentages used (i. e., 30 percent residential paper, etc.) are based on pmvious, similar sNdies peo- formed by SCS. Table 2-2 shows the number of samples sorted, per jurisdiction and waste source, during our field analysis. The sample numbers are based on Klee and Carnrth's formula, and relative percentage contribution of residential, commercial, and industrial waste sources to the overall waste disposed, Note that no industrial waste source samples were sorted for the City of Montclair, as the City has virtually no industrial sector. Rnute Selection As noted above, wastes collected from disposal company routes that serve predominantly one waste source were ident~ed for the sampling program. Only those mutes within a particular jurisdiction were sampled. If a portion of the route extended into another jurisdiction, it was excluded from the sampling program. For each jurisdiction, the residential, most of the commercial, and a few of the industrial routes were selected prior to beginning the field sampling program. A majority of industrial routes a-ere roll-off accounts, cohected on an on-call basis. As such, these routes were seletted the day before they were to be sampled. Self-haul {Dads were excluded fmm composition analysis because they contribute relatively insignificant quantities to the total overall wastes disposed by the five jurisdictions, Wastes from multifamily residential waste sources were excluded from the field sampling program because of the difficulty in separating them from commercial and industrial wastes contained in the same load. Multifamily residential wastes, according to disposal company repre- sentatives, constitute less than 10 percent of the total wastes combined in any given "com~ rnercial" load. 2-8 ~eld ~[peQ~n['E~ SCS ENGINEERS - Waste composition for each waste source within a particular jurisdiction was determined through a field sorting and weighing program conducted at the MIDiken landfill. The program was conducted over a 10-day period during the weeks of Ianuary 28 and Febmary 4, 1991. Preselected disposal trucks were directed to a designated sorting area which was removed from active landfilling operations. Field personnel recorded the disposal company name, waste source, jurisdiction, and net weight of the load (per weight tickets). Aker the truck discharged its entire load, a 2- to 3-cubic-yard sample (typically weighing 200 to 300 pounds) was obtained by use of a loader at the landfdl. Under the direction of the SCS field supervisor, two five-person crews manually segregated the sample by placing similar waste types into 32-gallon containers according to the categories shown in Table I-1. Descriptions of the waste types ate included in Appendix A. After the entire sample was cored, containers wets weighed, and the weights recorded. General Field Observationc- Outing the course of the field survey, the following observations were made: • No measurable precipitation occurred during the entire (0-day sort period • Significant quantities of paper were contaminated as a result of contact with food wastes. • Sigtificant quantities of concrete were found in some of the residential waste loads. • No "special wastes" were observed or sampled during the sorting period, ~: 2-9 SCS ENGINEERS - Field Results-- Results of the field program are included in Appendix B, These data are grouped according to waste source and jurisdiction and are arranged chronologically, For each sample, the net truck weight is presented along with the individual weights of the waste types. Waste composition (percent by weight) for each waste type is also shown, az calculated from the field weight dam. DATA AA'ALYSLS Statistipl Analyccc Smtisticat analyses were perforated on dam from the Field program for each waste source within each jurisdicdon. Analyses include minimum, maximum, and standard deviation, az welt az 90 percent confidence level values for the waste types (a 90 percent confidence level indicates that the tme mean value for a particular waste type can be expected to be contained within the lower and upper limits of the confidence level 90 percent of the tune). Tables 2-3 through 2-16 contain statistical information for waste types from particular waste sources and jurisdictions. All of these figures represent 1990 data. Overall Waste Composkion- The mean waste composition values for waste sources within a jurisdiction were. combined to provide an overall waste composition for that jurisdiction. Overall compositions ate based on the perceot amount of waste disposed by a jurisdiction; the overall waste compositions are, in effect, weighted averages. Overall waste compositions are presented in Tables 2-17 through 2-21. These mbles also show the quantity, expressed in tons, that a waste type contributes to a waste source, and the overall composition. Quantities were calculated from the mean values 2-f0 Sf5 ENGINEERS - for each waste type. Other Wastes- Although other wastes were not sampled during the waste sort, the landfill operator and the participating jurisdictions provided data on the amounts generated; these data are shown h[ Table 2-1 and Tables 3-6 through 3-10. Other wastes are comprised of City green waste, City street maintenance, and self-haul loads. A separate survey of self-haul loads delivered to Milliken Landfill from the participating jurisdictions was conduced to determine its composition. These data are shown in Table 2-21, and represent the average composition from all of [he jurisdictions combined. 2-I 1 ECS ENGINEERS TABLE z•i. E,47rIl4I.1't~ WASTIr DISIPI)SAI. RA7Tts PAR 7pR6DICTfOx• (loos p~ yearl Waste Source Juris- diction Resideotial+ Commercial Industrial OtherM Total San Bernaz- dino Unincorp. 39,760 13,320 22,200 3,120 77,400 Rancho Cucamonga 65,880 39,160 24,960 R,300 137,300 Chino 24.280 20,980 20,290 SOLO 75,450 Upland 43,920 16,080 9,480 3,380 72,860 MontolaU 17,400 11,880 240 1,950 31,470 TOTAL 145,240 100,320 77,160 21,760 344,480 ' Tonnage estimates provided by haulers serving the five jurisdictions. All values rounded to nearest 10 tons. + Includes wastes from single- and multifamily dwellings. q Includes City Services and self-haul wastes. 2-IZ SCS ENGINEERS - TABLE 2-Z. D73T8IDL1190N OF I.OAIkS SAMPLED DUi3ING I'YBLD PRU6iRA1H Waste Source 7urisdictioa Residential Commercial Industrial Total San Bemaz- dino Uninco[p. 8 9 IS 32 Rancho Cucamonga 14 26 t7 57 Chino 8 18 20 46 Upland 12 16 7 34 Montclair 8 l7 0 26 Total 50 86 59 194 2-13 TABLE 2-3 . UNINCORPORATED AREA OF WESTERN SAN BE RNARpINO COU N7Y RE SIBE NTIAL UATA SUMMARY/S 7A TISTICAL ANALYSIS (A 17 Va lUeS Percent by Weigh[) 9oa m,fea~ Inretval . Min ~ srd - - value vaLn ltem ~, [corer ;~Qei PAPpt 1l'~tEl 35.8 Iktepcint 3.2 55.6 14.4 16.1 3J 25.d Cnitain¢a 0.0 47.7 9.4 14.? O.C 19.J Ffi~+-gceie 0.0 8.4 1.4 2.B p.0 ].3 Mimi 0.0 i6.9 6.1 6.'_ 2.0 :0.: :rntm~Lbte7 0.0 17.9 4.4 5.8 0.5 2.3 PIA4PIC5 1brn1 8.9 :mtavr[a 0.0 4.6 0.6 1.5 0.0 1.6 PII' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 fffE 7.0 7.fi 1.8 2.d 0.0 3.1 Ellm 0.0 I0.2 3.4 3.0 1.3 6.J EblYetym~e 0.0 2.6 0.8 0.9 0.1 1.7 Orl~ei C.0 12.1 2.4 3.8 0.0 4.3 f]Jlss 'Loral 3.9 Ca. ilslegxim Value 0.0 4.7 1.6 1.8 0.4 2.8 ~Yau~ 0.0 6.0 1.7 2.3 0.2 ].3 Odes 0.0 4.7 p.6 1.6 0.0 1.6 Ia:WS 1bfa1 8.5 Alumnus Cme 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.5 O.C 0.6 Tin cav 0.0 4.6 2.0 1.7 0.9 3.2 FTau~e 0.0 18.4 J.2 6.0 0.0 ... Naf£¢xaa C.0 1.3 0.3 0.5 0.0 J.6 sure c3xae o.o G.o o.o p.o p.o o.o M:wd melnla 0.0 21.2 2.9 6.9 0.0 7.6 YAF6l iA41E Sbfal 18.9 riaen/]eeuce 0.0 46.0 lfi.d 18.2 4.2 28.6 Amite 0.0 20.2 2.5 6.7 0.0 7.0 NCl4-PAPPA aGtIICS 1bfe1 20.6 :1v3i 0.0 22.7 7.2 7.4 O.G 8.2 see eed 2~Fber 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ;brae 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ci~rnable [H~m 0.0 15.6 4.0 5.3 0.4 7.6 '1bRi]ee J.0 J7.0 7.7 11.5 0.0 15.4 O@~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 C111J014-4415 1bra1 3.6 i~elialt C.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ^.A O.Teaete 0.0 12.9 1.6 4.3 0.0 4.5 cu,ar rnecc solid) o.G o.o G.o o.o o.o o.J It~eaom xm. cec. o.a o.G o.p o.o o.o G.o E'i+ee 0.0 2.1 1.2 O.fi 0.8 1.6 :4Js;. 0,0 4.6 0.6 1.5 C.0 L6 :3~W, Ial41T' 1bra1 0.0 Ace 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.C silky Tram 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C.0 100.0 e smEiLn,a~el_,_Ymd z-Ia TABLE 2-4. UNINCORPORATED AA EA OF WESTERN SP.N BERNARD LNO COUNTY COMMERCIAL DATA SUMMARY/$TA TISTIC AL ANq LYSIS (All Values Percent by Wei ght) 9oa -+~.:.~-..- Incrsval Mir, Kvc std - ..- v_alin :al;ie ~, aw. r,..e• 'seer PAPfX 1btn1 23.2 [lwannt 0.0 :6.0 4.3 5.7 0.3 ].? -^^-'T,-^°'~ ~T*''^"" 0.0 72.3 5.9 9.9 J.9 119 =~'4'~ 0.0 7.3 :.1 1.7 0.0 2.5 ~~~ 0.0 78.0 7.9 11.] 1.: :4.] stam+ietai 0.0 17.2 4.0 5.1 ;,G '.1 PfA`IL'ICS 1bta1 9.8 =a+ta.rnss 0.0 1.7 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.5 ~' 0.0 5.6 0.9 1.8 0.0 1.3 ~'~ 40 4.2 i.6 1~5 0,6 2.6 Zim 0.0 16.7 l.d 5A 0.6 7,: ~iystycen 0.0 d.2 1.3 1.5 0.4 2.2 Q1~ 0.0 6.0 2.0 2.9 0,3 3.8 G. ROda~Cia~ Value 0.0 4.p 0.6 i.7 0.0 I.i ~t~~ o.o a.7 os l.s o.o La xher o.o o.o p.o o.o o.G o.o l091LS Sbtal 7.7 Alutivn taus 0.0 6.4 1.4 2.2 G.0 2.7 I]n cma 0.0 3.6 0.9 l.J 01 ~„ . FYnvis 0.0 22.7 4.7 8-] 0.0 9.3 >knfmaa 0.0 C.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 :.2 .tu*c O'mla 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.C 0.0 :.. Mva]netale 0.0 6.1 0.7 19 0.0 1.d VJd) li\918 1bta1 14.1 3ass~lan a 0.0 :00.0 14.1 30.9 0.0 J2.A Pimu+%p 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 O.J !Ri-PAP01 W[7YiI6 1Uta1 29.6 "¢d 0.0 37.9 S.B 11.6 0.0 12.8 sb¢1 0.0 J0.6 9.8 10.7 3.3 :6.2 'llt® arl WAh'r 0.0 100.0 I1.1 31.4 0.0 30.1 :+anue 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 apeeC]e D;¢+® 0.0 9.0 2.7 J.9 0,4 :.0 :F•xti]ee 0.0 7..0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.6 GThec G.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 p,p 0,0 OIlSFIt 4AS1YS 1bfw1 14.5 AsFlwit O.J 24.0 2.7 7.6 0.0 7.2 Cacxere 0.0 21.4 9.6 L9 4.8 ;;.a xhm Iron so7.~da c.o o.o o.o o.o n.o p.o it„eanm ~, wc. c.o o.o o.a J.a o.a G.o 1'++>s 0.0 3.1 1.0 1.0 0.6 i.6 10-°c• 0.0 6.1 1.7 2.6 0.0 2.? "..F'OQN. iW41lS 'ltr[nl 0.0 Arl~Cae 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 p.0 G.0 silky Itme 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.J i 00.C 9 smplm aal~2ed 2-IS TABLE 2-i. UNINC ORPO RA 7E0 AREA Of WESTERN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY INU US TR IAL ~JA iA SUMMA RV /$TA TISTICAL ANALY$I$ (Atl values Percent by Weight) 30A t'mfi,ie.,~ l nin Mmt 3N Ntvsva -- .-__ VaLb VLlue HOVt RV SNC `4'~t PAPER 'tMal d.3 ;AIM 0.0 6.6 0.4 1.7 0.0 L3 2a:.ep[¢1 Clfeainrss D.0 24.b 3.3 6.3 0.5 b.2 !iii-~a6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C.0 CB :4.» 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.5 0.0 O.i stapuated O.C 4.5 0.3 1.1 0.0 7.8 PfAY1R6 'lbral 13.1 ~mcaifwa~ 0.0 9.5 1.2 3.1 0.0 2.6 pE~ 0.0 2.9 0.2 0.7 0.0 C.5 !ppE 0.0 9.1 0.7 2.3 0.0 1.B ?~ 0.0 ld.l 3.1 4.7 1.0 5.2 ~blysLyleY~e O.D 0.5 0,0 0.1 0.0 0.1 OthY 0.0 45.7 ].8 13.] 1.6 iY.O C1JS4 1bEa1 1.1 ^-a. pal~xim VdJe 0.0 12.0 0.8 3.0 0.0 2.1 Cmtaum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 pfi}µ~ 0.0 8,6 OJ 1.2 0.0 G.8 t0•:7~ES 'lbtal 0.9 Ahinitmi Carp 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11n ~e 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 Fetiwe 0.0 62.8 "1.2 16.8 0.0 :a.8 tinfexaie 0.0 d.l 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.' +hitn rayp 0.0 0.0 O.C 0.0 G.0 C.0 nixid imtala 0,0 12.3 1.4 3.3 0.0 2.9 1TIdl EAYlE 1bYe1 4.8 3,a~gm~ae 0.0 I1J 1.4 3.5 0.0 2.9 ~p~ir~p 0.0 51.3 3.4 12.8 0.0 3.2 EIri-PAPER O[;i1MC5 1UEa1 35.3 F>, 1 0.0 10.5 O,B 2.6 0,0 2.0 tab OA A00.0 29.5 33,1 1i.5 i4.5 :'um ad Rrtber o.o o.o o.o o.o D.o o.o name o.o o.o o.a o.o o.o o.o r ~,me oi~,~ o.o o.o a.a o.o o.o o.a :b2i]ae o.o u.z 4.9 12.2 0.0 :0.4 o.o o.o o.o a.o o.o o.o o1ffiy 1'WSBS 1VEa1 72.6 Aq}ait 0.0 38,7 2.6 9.6 0.0 6.9 2ai¢eG 0.0 ;00.0 21.7 D.7 6.4 3fi9 Gthac Wit. Solids 0.0 100.0 fi.7 24.9 0.0 18.9 ;tvalold wz, wac, a.o 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 oa P,n9e 0.0 15.7 1.7 d.l 0.0 3.6 ,yy2. C.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SPQTAI. WM191T.. 1b1s1 0.0 ?A>~tna o.o o.o a.o a.o o.o n.o aany Irene ao C.o u.a o.o o.o o.o loo.a 15 sal3ee pialalynni 2-16 TABLE 2-6. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENTIAL DATA SUMMARY/STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (All Values Percent by Height) 9oa -- ln~zval ---- nin Fls~ sd ~ va1~.n value Hmt Oev lpxr '~. P3lp@1 1bta1 26.5 1~'++~t 0.0 20.5 9.1 5.0 6.3 ll.e .'7~upted Ctritaifaxe 0.0 26.9 5.4 7.2 2.1 8.7 i{i¢r~yade 0.0 4.6 1.4 1~5 0.] 2.0 Kvai 0.0 15.3 7.0 4.: 5.1 3.3 ~fteni'mtal J.0 16.3 3.7 4.5 l.fi 6J P1J~4PSCS 1bfa1 11.6 4itairea 0.0 3.0 J.6 i.0 0.1 1.J :?=1' 0.0 5.8 1.4 1.8 0.6 2.J `~ 0.0 10.8 1.] 2.8 0,4 3.] E>N O,a 14.5 3.7 4.2 1.8 5.6 [blyatyraa 0.0 5.7 0.9 1.6 0.2 1.6 0@ar 0.0 11.3 3.3 3.6 1.6 5.0 t31~ Obtal 6.1 G. Pedegrtiat Vela 0.0 14.2 4.0 4,4 2.0 6.0 clMevatn 0.0 ].B 2.1 2.7 0.9 3.4 G<l~ 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 C.0 I~TLK 1bCn1 9.2 Aluninm Cate 0.0 1.9 0.4 0.6 0.1 C.6 I]n acv 0.0 7.9 2.1 2.2 1.1 i.1 Flame 0.0 9.6 2.7 3.6 O.D J,9 tinfeavue 0.0 1.5 0.3 J.5 0.1 C.6 atie<come o.o o.a D.o o.o a.o ca Htmd netnle 0,0 30.4 4.2 8.5 0.0 d.l YNd/ iA41E 1bta1 27.6 (ima/Imtee 0.0 68.7 24.3 19.3 15.6 33.1 F3tnvg 0.0 21.2 3.3 6.2 0.5 6.1 HN-f11PlJl CRAtIICS 'lbldl 13.9 Flxd 0.0 13.] 3.7 7.5 2.1 5.3 41oci 0.0 30.9 5.2 9.1 1.1 9.4 'Glee ad AlYLei 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.J wise 0.0 10.0 1.2 3.0 O.U 2.6 of-'¢seble Diem 0.0 6.8 1.8 2.J 0.8 d.d 41gR3]~eo 0.0 6.2 1.7 2.2 0.] <.7 Otlar 0.0 2.1 0.3 0.] 0.0 0.6 O[HI7l IASffi 1bta1 5.1 a~3alt OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.) matte 0.0 8.1 0.6 2_2 0.0 1.6 Othi IItst F,alide 0.0 D.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 O.J Ituaanid xez. wet. a.J D.o o.o u.o n.o o.J Fi+ae 0.0 3.0 0.9 0.9 0.5 1.J ltix. 0.0 :1.6 3.fi 4.B 1.4 5.8 v~CLIL {A81C3 1Utn1 0.0 Ad'~Fa OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ... flIlky Item 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O. J 100.0 l4 omQlm erxlyaed 2-17 7AB LE 2-7. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOM4ERCIAL DATA SUMMARY/STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (A 17 Values Percent by Weight) 904 Cmfidarce nrt~v al --__ etin Nmr ~ value vgl_ie Dhm ~v taQ [~ PAPHt Total 36.4 IYxe[rvrt 0.0 14.3 2.8 3.9 1.5 4.1 vazu}ited n~rtainen 0.0 83.6 11.4 16.7 5,8 16.9 :ti~aie 0.0 21.6 5.0 6.9 2.7 ].3 N1~md 0.0 72.7 10.8 15.4 5.6 i5.9 pTtanitated 0.0 40.0 6.5 8.8 8.0 9.4 P1A41RCS 1Ma1 11.5 m;[air~e 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.8 C.0 :.2 ;,a' 0.0 4.6 0.6 1.3 0.1 1.0 i[FE 0.0 4.6 1.0 1.3 0.6 1.5 F7]m 0.0 41.3 5.6 9.5 2.6 8.3 Pvly9.y[ere 0.0 2.6 0.6 0.9 0.3 0.9 ONe O.C 21.2 3.3 5.3 1.5 5.0 (SASS Tbtel 2.5 Ca. PedaSmim VaLa 0.0 10.7 1.6 2.7 0.8 2.5 pSrtaL»is 0.0 7.0 0.7 1.5 0.2 1.2 pHie 0.0 5.4 0.2 1.1 0.0 0.6 1~ Ttfinl 6.3 Atrmvun rane 0.0 3.4 0.7 1.1 0.3 1.1 T]n care 0.0 6.4 1.2 1.8 0.6 1.8 paz¢re 0.0 25.1 2.5 7.0 0.0 J.9 Itnfuwe 0.0 5.8 0.4 1.3 0.0 C.8 chite Coma 0,0 7.0 O.l 1.4 0.0 0.7 Hrmd:Rtala 0.0 15.5 1.2 3.4 0.1 2.3 YNa) W141E 1bta1 6.0 (2aBylenee 0.0 53,0 5.4 12.2 1.3 9.4 PyWyjryr 0.0 15.4 0.6 3.0 0.0 1.fi NTF~PAPIX ORSalII(-S ItRal 20.6 Ftcd 0.0 15.6 3.1 4.7 I.5 4.] :ktd 0.0 100.0 15.7 27.8 6.4 25.0 Ti[ee erd Rr/fGi 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C.0 Mnum 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Q.C illapae67a Oi¢:m 0.0 5.6 0.7 1.5 0.2 1.1 ',b,Tyl¢e 0.0 8.8 0.8 1.8 0.2 L4 Ot1e1 0.0 6.2 0.3 1.2 0.0 0.8 Cll}pp Yil9e"' 1bta1 16.7 neA,nlt o.o o.o n.o o.o o.o ^.a ¢enete 0.0 52.2 9.9 16.1 3.6 :J.3 oHie[ Ire[ 6olide 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O,J Flaadnld Haz. Wet. O.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 :.9 F]nee 0.0 6.1 1.8 1.6 1.2 i.l Mis. C.0 100.0 6.0 19.5 0.9 1Z.5 ~AI.i0.9A5 Tbtal 0.0 A~aefm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 •~- 3ilky Itme 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ... 100.0 26 smlilee mn:~id 2-iB TABLE 2-8. CITY OF RANCHO CD CAMONGA INOOSTRIAL DATA SGMMA RY/STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (All Values Percent by Weight) 3ca ~~a--~ '-+i'. Zva1 Min ;bx Std -- 'Jalue Vr1 w Fiat Cev :a.er '-~. P1IPFIL 1btw1 21.7 '~`~~1 0.0 9.6 i.2 2.2 0.J ~., 0~•.yetd O~rtninete 0.0 28.2 10.7 11.0 6.1 15.4 ~~*~~ 0.0 41.9 6.J :0.9 1.7 :0.3 ~~ 0.0 50.0 ~ 7.6 12.B 2.1 13.0 Ofe1 0.0 8.2 1.3 2.9 0.6 3.1 PIA91RC5 •hiGy 22.1 ^'^ ~ 0.0 ].4 1.0 2.3 0.0 2.0 ~' 0.0 5.1 0.] 1.5 0.1 1.3 t~E 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 E]1<n 0.0 22.9 3.1 5.4 C.9 S.q Fbiyecyiwn 0.0 L9 0.9 2.0 0.0 1.7 OtM[ C.0 ]5.9 16.6 20.3 8.0 25.2 ~~ 'Mal 0.5 G. N~ptim VxL~e 0.0 2.9 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.9 mrtmnets 0.0 0.S 0.0 0.1 0.0 O.i otl>~ 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1RD1i6 1Ma1 6.8 ALmin~s fav 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 C.0 01 T1n ~ 0.0 5.7 0.9 2.0 0.0 1.5 F7•aaID O.C 1fi.4 3.] 5.1 1.6 69 tbSmaa 0.0 6.5 0.9 1.9 0.2 .., Write ~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C.0 Ht>md l~etele 0.0 B.6 1.2 2.S 0.1 2.2 Yale M91E 1bta1 1.1 Q'am/1en'ee 0.0 I5.0 1.1 l.6 0.0 2.6 ~ni~*T 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 tai-PAP91 C1~ 1Uta1 21.5 fboi 0.0 10.8 1.2 2.7 0.0 2.4 Wxd 0.0 81.3 19.0 24.] BA 29.3 Tl1m ad »~er 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I4>nae 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Oiepa~le O1~® 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.C IbcCi7ID 0.0 16.] 2.5 5.3 O.J 4J xl+Q o.0 3o.J l.e ].1 a.o 4.9 ~+ 9A']vs 1Me1 17.0 A~+: .. e.e o.s 2.1 0.0 1.4 ~~ 0.0 45.8 9.8 16.0 3.1 16.5 ~~ D>st Aids 0.0 100.0 5.9 23.5 0.0 15.9 Ibueddd Nm. WR. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~^m 0.0 J,B 0.4 1.0 0.0 0.8 Mis• O.J 2.0 0.4 0.9 0.0 ,.9 SP0.'UL H19~ 'Ib~el 0.0 Peheeta~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 silky Item O.o a.a o.o o,o o.a ~:.3 Ioo.O _] emQlm a,e1_~ 2-19 TABLE 2-9. CITY OF CHINO RESIDENTIAL OAiA SUMMARY/STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (All Values Percent by Weight) 9oa m~fidvcs xsn nay srd R,rene - i vaLa v=u, em, ua, ~..z c~ P2fPFR 1bta1 30.9 faeEr,nT. 2.2 21.1 8.3 6.0 4.5 12.1 ~uP'~ C~+tauece 0.0 1C.0 3.9 3.5 1.7 6.1 ~~a~^ 0.0 10.7 2.0 3.4 0.0 4.2 ~~ 7.2 20.7 33.8 d.2 9.1 14.4 antanir~aced 0.0 14.5 5.0 5.1 1.7 B.2 PtA4fiC5 •Mel 11.5 Q~ltainaLn 0.0 18.1 3.0 5.9 0.0 GA ~ 0.0 7.6 1.5 2.4 0.0 3.C F~ 0.0 2.2 0.5 0.8 0.0 1.0 film 0.2 10.3 4.6 3.1 2.7 6.5 Fblyagxvn 0.0 7.2 2.2 2.2 0.9 3.6 0@er 0.0 7.6 2.] 2.2 1.3 4.1 ~ 1bte1 5.0 ce. ~3a1 Value 0.0 8.0 3.1 2.6 1.5 4.7 ~~ 0.0 6.2 1.5 2.1 0.2 2.8 Oth¢ 0.0 3.8 0.5 1.3 0.0 1.3 !@ALS Rbtnl {.1 tlunvun Cme 0.0 1.B 0.6 0.7 0.2 1.1 ISn cme 0.0 5.9 Z.0 1.7 0.9 J.: f>a~ 0.0 ].6 1.4 2.5 0.0 3.0 Narfe¢ab 0.0 1.1 0.3 0,4 0.0 0.6 4hitt Ottda 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.0 Mim1 netaia 0.0 0,3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 YNm iA43E 1bte1 17.] CaaeNlea~ee 0.0 34.6 13.3 11.6 6.0 20.] Pnnings 0.0 19.0 4.0 6.6 0.0 B.2 lIZ1WtAPQI GR~1R[6 1bte1 16.3 FLM 0.0 7.3 J.e 2.5 2.2 SA 4bb 0.0 26.6 4,8 B.6 0.0 10.3 'fYxea ed Rtter 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 !Im¢e a,0 3.1 0.4 1.0 0.0 LO Oise O1R® 0.0 12.0 Z.2 3.9 0.0 4." 'OORi.Ln 0.0 14.5 3.9 S.d 0.6 ~.1 oH,ar o.a a.7 1.2 2.a o.0 3.a ai>m+ rwvas zow us agiaic o.o a.o o.o o.o o.o o.o ~e 0.0 21.4 d.7 7.3 0.1 9.4 Wnr IICC Soi.i~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.C Ibuednld Hax• Wet. 0.0 2.1 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.9 Fl+iea 0.0 3.2 1.3 1.0 0.6 2.0 ftiaC• 0.0 :5.8 5.0 6.6 0,8 9.2 s'H91G IA'1l1l5 1bte1 0.0 !~~ 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Silky here 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 100.0 e smplea males 2-20 TABLE 2-;0. CITY GE CHINO COMMERC IAI ~JA iA SUMMARY /$TAT[S7ICAL ANALYSIS (All Values Pe rcenc by Weight) 9oa C~,tidav^e :ntex~al ---- M:+t :Smt SYd value Vaiue :tan Dev :aee 1~r P31PHt 1tRn1 18.3 ;>?•.,~in[ 0.0 16.5 2.3 4.4 1.1 J.7 tanxptd 0.0 25.9 5.8 6.fi ].I 9.6 iticJ~ycxde 0.0 12.1 2.1 3.7 0.0 3.6 a~md 0.0 :9.7 4.8 5.7 2.5 7.2 ~ttm~vateai 0.0 10.8 2.6 3.7 1.1 4.2 13A4126 1btn1 22.6 Ctr~tejn¢e J.0 6.1 1.1 2.2 0.2 2.0 FLR' 0.0 1.1 0.2 O.d 0.0 0.3 tCFE 0.0 12.7 2.6 3.9 1.0 4.2 Flim 0.0 29.9 6.5 8.1 3.2 3.9 Fglyatymte C.0 24.0 2.6 5.5 0.0 J.9 GfM 0.0 91.0 9.E 21,4 0.0 1BA GIA65 1tka1 3.0 :a. Paderytirn Vnlia 0.0 5.9 1.1 1.9 O.l 1,9 ;atrmraa 0.0 8.7 1.2 2.6 0.1 2.] a7>Q 0.0 11.8 0.7 2.7 0.0 1.8 !2'D~SS 'lbtal 6.1 , }tluw~m Cale 0.0 3.3 O.fi ! .1 0.0 1.0 YSn rage 0.0 4.6 1.0 1.5 0.4 1.6 Fetmte 0.0 20.d 2.5 5.3 0.0 JJ ltnfaQVa 0.0 5.0 0.4 1.2 0.0 C.9 )2tite G,uie 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CA Himtl netda 0.0 14.4 1.6 d.0 0.0 3.3 YM07 4i~93E 1bte1 7.0 Cieeq/lee~e!e 0.0 33.4 7.0 :0.4 2.7 11.3 a;~ninge O.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 9.a taN-PMGl 01C~1taCS 'AbFal 30.6 Ftcd 0.0 45.J 6.2 10.8 1.7 10.6 Wrd 0.0 48.8 13.2 15.4 fi.9 19.fi :'Sim ad R3ber 0.0 50.8 2.8 11.6 0.0 7.6 MaeIl! OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ci_~seeUle Dir{tem 0.0 1].7 1.3 3.2 0.0 2.6 '[KSti:ce OA 9.d 1J 2.3 0.0 27 oUn7 0.0 110.0 5.7 22.9 0.0 I'..1 mt3m tal41YS 14tn1 12.5 leFhalt OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.C 0.0 Cba~Kn G.0 <9.2 9.0 10.5 4.7 13.J OUipi IOe[t Solids '.A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 Ftatmin7d Hex. Wet. 0.0 O.J 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 Fixes 0.9 3.0 O.B 1.0 O.d L2 :~1i. 4tl141L9 1b41 0.0 p~{eetae 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.9 a+ixY IYaie 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FO 100.0 19 `-a'~Plee a~al1znl 2-21 TABLE 2-11. CITY OF CHINO [ND USTR IAL BATA SUMMARY/STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (All Values ve rcent by Weight) 908 fav.'~ 31It/21p1 _ Min Y.mt SYd VElUG Jalue :NI ~/ 1aa :.~YS PnPHI 'nrtal 16.9 ,+ 0.0 14.9 1.5 4.0 0.0 J.G uaniJeCd p9i0yyt~ 0.0 65.2 10.6 15.6 4.6 i6. i Hy~~~ 0.0 7.7 0.9 2.1 0.1 ;.7 Mimd 0.0 14.4 2.2 7.7 0.] 7.6 pntmufyral 0.0 12.2 1.7 3.B 0.3 7.2 PIJl4fIC5 'mGl 17.8 nntairrs>. 0.0 4.6 0.e 1.6 0.2 1.4 pQ 0.0 4.] 0.7 1.6 0.1 1.3 ~{; 0.0 3.1 0.4 0.8 0.1 J.7 tYlm 0.0 25.a 2.4 6.3 0.0 4.a EblyAytv+e 0.0 12.7 1.8 J.] 0.J 7.2 p2y~ 0.0 100.0 11.8 22.7 3.0 2G.6 QA4 1bty1 1.2 ;y, pedmptim yy~y 0.0 2.8 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.9 QxKmnc~ 0.0 9.6 0.6 2.1 J.0 1.5 Orlyr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1le01TS 7bta1 4.7 ALlninm ray 0.0 1.9 0.2 0.5 0.0 O.i 1~n ~y 0.0 1.6 0.3 0.5 0.1 ~C.S lgz¢y 0.0 21.5 ].5 6.4 1.1 5J µn(~y 0.0 6.7 0.7 1.5 0.0 9.9 Wti's fie 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,y;~md mefeln 0.0 6.fi 0.7 1.4 0.0 ~.3 trp10) IA91E 1W1 6.7 3-e~/Ima~ 0.0 100.0 6.7 22.2 0.0 15.3 py~>~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 J.G ta}pApm OliO9QCS 1TRa1 d1.5 E'¢d 0.0 23.1 1.3 5.0 0.0 7.2 ibd 0.0 100.0 32.0 37.9 18.9 45.1 i14l. and lwnr o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o G.J M~,m o.J o.o o.o o.o o.o o.G J,$>~>e m,~,ea o.o o.a G.a o.l o.o a.l Im¢ilee G.o 96.7 7.a n.7 G.o ls.a OUVS GA 13.2 0.8 2.9 0.0 1.9 01~11A41f 'Ntal 11.2 Aelhalt 0.0 5.9 0.3 1.3 0.0 C.a ate O.C 65.2 10.3 19.1 2.9 17.7 ocm uyrt solids e.o G.o o.o o.o o.G G.o Ftz,e~e Nez. wrt. o.J o.o o.o o.o o.0 7.0 1]~ys 0.0 7.2 0.5 0.8 0.2 0_B Mis. 0.0 1.8 0.1 O.d 0.0 7.7 SP12IN.IARpL9 1bty1 0.0 j,~y 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .. 2ylky Itw~s 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 9.0 100.0 20 saP14t aLel zed 2-22 TABLE 2-12. CITY Gf UPLAND RESIDENTIAL DATA SUMMARY /STATISTICRL ANALYSIS (A71 Values Percent by Weight) 904 crnfida,w Mii Hmc Std Interval _ _ Value Value Nan 0.v Her Lamer PAPOt 1bta1 24.3 [1'.Qr~nt 0.0 17.9 fi.7 5.] 3.9 9.5 ¢aztge[ed QxKdircie 0.0 10.2 4.5 3.2 2.9 6.1 Hijr ysle D.0 4.6 0.9 1.4 0.1 1.6 Mimd 0.0 1J.6 7.3 3.7 5.4 9.2 ~x+tariuxted 0.0 8.2 4.9 2.5 7.6 6.2 [RA9CIC5 1bta1 8.9 QnTairrie 0.0 6.7 0.8 LB OA L7 HI' 0.0 1.3 OS 0.4 0.J 3.7 IgE 0.0 2.5 0.7 0.7 0.3 1.0 E]]m 0.0 4.3 2.4 L0 1.8 2.9 FblyeCycve 0.0 3.2 0.6 0.8 0.4 1.2 Otter' 0.0 14.3 3.8 3.9 1.B 5.9 QA4 1tRa1 3.8 U. Hedeiptim Value O.o 8.5 1.8 2.7 0.4 3.2 (trKa1f1lID 0.0 7.4 2.0 2.5 0.7 3.] oUer 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IF:D1T5 1bta1 6.9 Almunm CSa 0.0 L7 0,3 0.5 0.0 0.6 17n ~ v 0,0 5.1 3.9 1.3 1.3 2.6 Fhmv 0.0 22.3 3.1 7.1 0.0 6.8 C+Tf~aa O.o 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.: 4hitc Cca7e 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Himi netdn 0.0 13.2 1,4 3.6 0.0 7.3 Yt407 iRYif[ 1btn1 26.1 cYaeeAeats 0.0 OJ.6 21.7 1J.5 14.3 28.3 Pnniry 0.0 33.4 4.B 9.4 0.0 9.7 N']4-191PF]4 QCNIIG" 1U4a1 17.7 Ftoa 0.0 12.9 4.4 3.3 2.7 6.0 Wal 0.0 19.7 4.2 6.6 0.7 Z6 Tixee and Wilmer 0.0 7,1 O.fi 1.9 0.0 1.6 More¢e 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 oispmehle tbgxn 0.0 7.4 3.2 2.9 1.9 4.5 TMTwRilae 0.0 J3.6 6.7 0.8 0.1 9.3 otter 0.0 5.9 0.7 1.7 0.0 1.6 O11II~R 1A41t5 1b1'nl 12.4 tugivlt 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.' 0.0 ('~tw 0.0 20.7 5.J 7.8 L2 9.3 otter 3~ Aide o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.a Fbiedn]d lLaz. Vbt. 0.0 2.2 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.6 Firee 0,0 3.6 1.4 1Q O.B 2.0 Mis. 0.0 10.J 5.5 3.6 J.7 7.4 6P93N. ip9p9 'total 0.0 Aeheeca 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.C flilky Itan• 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~... 100.0 12 mipis axl__~ 2-23 TABLE 2-13. LITY OF UPLAND COMMERCIAL OA 7A SUMMARY /S TATI$TICAL ANALYSIS (All Values Percent by Weight) Sae a~,rlda:e ltin Mx y~1 ZnCava - l v~ue vaWe ~ ~,, to-er P11PO1 'total 23.0 >k"~~-'2 0.0 51.4 10.4 15.3 3.7 .7.9 Qancptei Qidainan 0.0 17.4 4.6 5.0 2.4 6.> H'~~T4r~ 0.0 21.1 2.0 5.2 C.0 4.3 :1na1 0.0 21.7 2.7 5.4 0.4 6.C '~~+~~ C.0 34.2 3.4 B.J 0.0 7.J P1A4C26 1tRa1 8.8 CaKaine[e 0.0 S.1 0.6 1.4 J.0 1.< LC 0.0 3.1 0.3 0.8 C.0 OJ i[PE 0.0 6.1 1.4 2.2 OA 2.3 E17m 0.0 12.9 3.9 d,2 2.1 5.7 FolY~tYra+e 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.4 0.0 p,4 Othn' O.C 16.9 2.4 4.6 0.4 4.5 (il~'S 'Mal 3.9 Ca. Rala~flim VeLr• 0.0 9.1 2.1 2.9 0.9 l.3 OTtNro[e 0.0 11.7 1.8 3.5 0.3 3.3 Orhrs 0.0 1.6 a.l 0.4 0.0 p,J MEWS 'Mal 6.I ALmvam Cme 0,0 6.0 0.7 1.1 0.2 L2 1Yn case 0.0 7.d 1.3 1.4 C.3 2.4 EYaum 0.0 16.6 2.5 5.0 0.3 4.7 tiTfwle 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 9.1 'rtAfa fm9e C.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 J.0 Miwd rteeala 0.0 9.4 1.8 3.5 0,0 3.4 YNiD tA978 1bta1 28.2 CrmNlemee 0.0 90.3 16.1 16.0 4.B 27.6 ~~ 0.0 1J0.0 12.0 26.5 0.4 27.5 lLTi-PAPO1 OM;71HI1S 1pta1 21.0 fl~ 0.0 30.4 4.0 8.0 0.5 7,5 41h>i 0.0 38.9 7.9 10.8 3.1 12.6 TSme ad F6il~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mnnae 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CRepeehle OitEm 0.0 SA 1.0 1.5 0.3 1.6 "•~il® 0.0 60.6 8.2 15.1 1.5 14.8 CUei 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 011101 W~ab4 'Mal B.7 AeFMlt 0.0 22.4 l.d 5.4 OA 3.a ~« 0.0 19.J 4.4 L7 Ll 7.9 orler mere ~hds J.J o.o p.a o.e o.o a.J FGrelnld Nn. 4bt. 0.0 C.0 0.0 0.0 G.0 0,0 FYrm 0.0 5.1 LO 1.6 O.l 1.5 Hi~• 0.0 17.2 1.9 3.5 0.] 7.4 `~Tl. tg41ES 1bta1 0,0 n~eelne 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ;,J Silky Mann 0.0 p.d 0.0 0.0 0.0 ;J 100.0 16 smpl® aiel~^q! 2-24 TABLE 2-14. CITY OP UPLAND INDUSTRIAL DATA SUMMARY /STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (All Values Percent by Weight) 904 aTfidace I t l Hin :lm~ std n erva value value !bn Ltv Iasz t}~e PMH1 14ta1 ].1 `ktslxinc. 0.0 4.4 0.7 1.5 0.0 L9 Cc¢trJeta! PiRaircn 0.0 13.6 5.5 5.6 0.0 9.6 Bi¢rg-a3e O.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 Mi>sl 0.0 3.3 0.6 1.0 0.0 1.6 -r..r~: +~i 0.0 2.2 0.3 0.8 0.0 09 PtARICS abtnl 19.5 Qnt~~ 0.0 J3.9 6.6 11.9 0.0 15.4 oE1~ 0.0 6.8 1.0 2.4 0.0 2.7 !1YE 0.0 3.8 0.5 1.3 OA 1.5 F1n 0.0 ll.5 2.1 4.] 0.0 5.5 mlyecyzere o.o a.7 a.l 0.2 0.0 0.3 Ot1yr 0.0 ''<B.9 9.2 9.9 1.9 16.5 Qll§ 'lbtal. O.fi Ce, n~ yalu~ 0.0 4.1 0.6 1.4 0.0 1.6 pntyly~ 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Otts4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 lt~i6 atfinl 11.3 p1~4nitu4 ray 0.0 C.8 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.3 :1n cay 0.0 2.2 0.J 0.8 0.0 0.9 lbaay 0.0 20.1 4.5 7.5 0.0 10.1 IYf1(Bpy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W,;ti ramie o.o o.a o.o o.a o.o a.3 lttiwd rtertale 0.0 44.5 fi.4 15.6 0.0 ll.B YIVdJ YA41E '1tRa1 0.5 (Yamy]ee~d 0.0 3.3 0.5 1.2 0.0 1.3 pyyd~~y 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t~P1lYeti Gla';lY~ 1btG1 15.7 Fly 0.0 74.4 10.6 26.0 0.0 29.8 y~ipd 0.0 ]B.7 22.5 27.5 0.0 42.7 ~ISim ad W>H}r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 yy~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.G O.C pieEnaeyy]e Diape4e 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 'Ib2ilea 0.0 87.3 12.7 30.5 0.0 35.0 Othi 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cnffif SAY1L5 1bta1 15.] l~3ylt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ate 0.0 100.0 14.3 35.0 0.0 40.0 otla Lit Salida 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hau>rho7d Hez. Wt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ESnee 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.6 Mi nr, 0.0 5.4~ 0.8 1.9 0.0 2.2 ~CIAL 1A9R5 1btn1 0.0 /~eetd 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 gIlky ltem 0.0 0.0 0_0 0.0 0.0 C.0 :00.0 7 smQlee mel •Ded 2-2~ TABLE 2-15. LITV OF MON TC LA IR RES IDEN 7IAL DATA SUMMARY/STATISTICAL ANA LV SIS (All Values Percent by Weight) PAPtR :l~I'-IfL C~iLpYatil CT~dY@1 Fi:~aie Yinai CanmumEed PfA4f'IC5 :m4dretrr FEC Fi!£ FY1m ~lyegzax oUer QASS ca. AdmP61m Vela mitm++eze over ME1f1L+ Vunintn Cab 7Sn as Fermn tq~if~m Hite (lain Mimi rterale YIY/0 IA41L 3aed ]seam Pnnvge tUi-PAF9t QCJ1tin5 Fhd 4bai ::ten ad Wtier 1141IIA 0~able niq+exe 1Pxtile9 Otlei 0[ffi]t YA9RS AeplNlt '~U orlnc' next Solids H.aiednld Wn.. VlC. 1]ree Iti~. S1H7Ai. FA41}S e3GbmlYe Silky Itmn 90a c7~fiderne S 1 Nin Pea Std 11tGCV a -_ value VaLn !Um 2v Ica_ec ~nx 1bte1 34.7 1.3 18.6 8.7 i.1 5.4 12.0 0.0 17.2 9.1 6.0 5.2 iJ.O 0.0 13.2 4.0 q,l 1.4 fi.7 0.0 13.6 8.0 3.9 5.5 10.5 0.0 17.2 4.9 6.0 1.0 d.8 1bta1 17.3 0.0 9.1 1.8 J.0 0.0 3.' 0.0 1.7 0.4 J.6 0.0 O.d 0.0 9.5 2.4 3.3 0.2 =.5 1.9 16.i 5.9 q.2 4.1 0.0 6.2 J.1 2.2 1.7 S.5 0.0 8.2 2.8 2.6 1.1 J.6 1bta1 5.1 0,0 4.0 1.5 1.5 0.6 2.5 0.0 7.7 3.5 3.2 1.5 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.J 1bG1 11.2 0.0 2.0 0.7 0.7 0.2 LI 0.4 9.0 3.9 3.2 1.8 6.0 0.0 3.9 0.5 1.3 0.0 1.3 0.0 10.7 l.fi 3.5 0.0 J.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 4.6 5.3 1.2 3.0 'IbGl 5.2 0.0 i7.9 S.l 9.6 0.0 i1.3 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.4 1Vtn1 14.8 0.0 17.2 5.5 5.6 1.B 9.1 ' 0.0 21.7 5.6 L8 0.5 146 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 1.6 2.6 0.0 l.2 0.0 S.8 1.7 1.7 0.6 2.8 0.0 3.1 0.4 1.0 0.0 1.0 1b[el 11.7 0.0 OA 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 20A 4.B 8.J 0.0 10.1 0.0 O.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.J 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C.0 0.0 q.2 1.8 1.5 0.8 2.8 0.0 1.6 5.2 5.0 2.0 B.J 1b[el 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,., 100.0 B smQlee sallan4 2-26 TABLE 2-16. CITY Of MONTC LA IR COMMERCIAL DATA SUMMARY/STATISTICAL ANA LYSI$ (All Values Percent by Weight) 'U.eFnn[ ~~ H:~r<¢ab PIA7PiC5 FII' FIVE F.~s FblyeG}xae Oiler QA4 Ca. pedetptirn Vela micas G<1e lteWS ALminm Coro 31n eu .hiG c»~e E2cd Wa4 Mee ad I4tLec Neens ~~ Ci¢en iFxGilee oUer rn~ w~vas AeFfult CUi¢cte Ater -+ae Solids Iiveftnld t1s. ueF:. Evs His. Htlky Item 909 (Ynfi.L.r. InVival Min !tn[ Scd Value VaLt l4~m ~~ :ner ~.~ri 1bta1 36.3 0.0 13.4 l.9 4.i L9 5.] 0.0 60.6 1fi.1 17.2 9.8 27.4 0.0 21.2 4.3 6.0 1.7 5.d 0.0 42.5 9.9 11.0 5.] 14.5 0.0 B.J 2.2 2.9 0.9 3.Y 'Ibtel 21.e 0.0 5.8 0.5 1.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 15.5 1.2 3.] OA 2.9 0.0 6.2 1.8 2.2 0.9 2.7 0.0 19.9 5.3 6.] 2.9 ;.7 0.0 5.8 1.2 1.9 0.4 1.9 0.0 42.4 11.5 14.0 5.5 i].3 1tfa1 1.6 0.0 10.4 1.4 2.7 0.3 2.6 0.0 2.2 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 1bcn1 8.6 0.0 3.2 0.6 0.9 0.2 IA 0.0 4.9 1.1 1.7 0.4 :.8 0.0 12.5 2.2 J.d G.6 ...., 0.0 0.9 0.1 O.J 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.1 4.6 9.6 0.5 9.7 1tRa1 5.3 0.0 41.8 4.6 10.3 0.0 9.9 0.0 15.0 0.9 J.5 0.0 2.4 1bta1 22.3 0.0 12.7 2.J 7.6 0.8 7.8 0.0 31.1 14.2 L0.9 9.5 IB.B 0.0 23.9 1.4 5.6 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.0 OA 0.0 J.6 0.7 1.0 0.0 0.d 0.0 21.6 4.1 6.2 1.5 5.] o.G a.o o.0 0.0 a.o G.3 'lbenl 4.s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.0 0.0 14.2 2.3 4.9 0.2 4.Y o.o o.G G.G G.o 0.0 G.o a.o G.G G.o o.o o.o :.o a.o 4.2 0.9 is o.3 1.s 0.0 10.2 l.J 2.5 0.2 2.4 1tRe1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ... 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ).0 100.0 1] se~lee_aixlyzel 2-2~ TABLE 2-17. OVERALL ANNUAL WASTE DISPOSAL RATE FOR UN [NCORPQRATEO AREAS OF WE57 SAN BERNA RDINO COUNTY AESIDERI'IAL COlp~FiCSAL INWS IATN. OVERALL Waete So~¢ce Waafe 5a,u'ea Waste So,.+, ce Waste Cw+~si L'.n ~y/W '1h R9 ;N 1 ~.Sh3 ~V W :bn9 1V~'d :trs PAPPR C1eWSptlrtt 1i.4 5,500 4J 570 0.4 90 9.4 6,240 Corrvgated Cantainea 9.4 3,640 5.3 790 3.3 730 6.9 5,160 Hi gh-gsa9e 1.4 540 1.1 150 0.0 0 0.9 fi90 Maxad 6.1 2,360 7.9 1,050 0.2 40 1.7 3,4d0 rontamirated 4.4 1,710 4.0 530 0.3 70 3.1 2,300 PLA9TLC5 Oentnmecs 0.6 130 0.2 30 1.2 270 0.7 530 PET 0.0 0 0.9 120 0.2 40 0,2 160 HOPE 1.9 700 l.b 210 0.7 !60 1.4 1,070 FiLn 3.4 1,320 3.8 510 3.i 690 3.{ 2,510 Eb lystyrene 0.0 310 1.3 170 CA 0 0.] 480 Oth¢ 1.4 530 2.0 270 7.0 1,730 3.9 2,910 GLASS Ca. Rade~tinn Value 1.6 620 0.6 00 0.8 180 1.2 880 Con'ain¢e L7 660 0.5 70 0.0 0 1.0 730 ot}ier 0.6 230 0.0 0 0.3 70 0.3 300 METAIS Almrtimsn cv~n 0.2 80 1.4 190 D.0 0 O.i 260 Tins Cans 2.0 780 0.9 120 0.0 0 1.2 900 Ferrous 3.2 1,240 4.7 670 7.2 1,600 4.7 3,460 lbnfetcow 0.7 110 0.1 10 0.2 40 0.2 170 Whjte Cords 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 ltixed Metals 1.9 1,120 0.7 90 i.4 310 2.1 1,530 YARD 5A5'f6 GreaeJlmvee 16.4 6,360 13.1 1,880 1.4 310 11.5 8,550 Pc uninge 7.5 970 0.0 0 3.4 750 2.3 1,720 N[Xi-PAPffil OAGAt72C0 Focd 5.6 2,170 5.8 7]0 0.8 1B0 4.2 3,120 Wuod 3.2 1,2-00 9.9 1,710 29.5 6,550 12.2 9,090 :sea and ftubtrr 0.0 0 11.1 1,480 0.0 0 1.0 1,480 anure O.o 0 0.0 O 0,0 0 0.0 0 aispyee6le 4,0 :,550 2.7 360 0.0 0 Z6 1,310 TaMi lee 7,1 2,900 0.2 30 4.9 1,090 5.5 4,100 oth¢ o.0 0 0.o a a.D 0 0.0 0 mgt 4iwslts Asph+s7.2 0.0 0 2.1 360 1.6 580 1.3 910 Ccn¢ete 1,6 620 9.6 1,290 21.7 4,820 9.0 6,720 Ofhet Tnert Sa14L 0.0 0 0.0 0 6.7 1,490 2.0 1,490 Hovxhold Mex. Wa[. 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Finn 1.2 470 1,0 130 1.7 380 1.3 980 MASC. 0.6 230 1.3 170 0.0 0 0.5 410 SIRCIAL lA\S18S Aabee toe 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Sulky Ltene 0_0 0 0_C 0 0,0 0 0_C _ '(CYI'AL 100 38,760 100 13,320 100 22,200 100 74,280 DOm not include self-haul or'city/wunty services ~.•aste scurces. 2-28 TA9LE 2-!8. OVERALL ANNUAL WASTE U(SPOSAL RATE FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO NGA ReszoNNrlu, Cd0®tCI11L 33iR 9S1RW, w Fa>,lc Wae[e Source Waeie Souxce Waste Source waste Coln(neitian iw vr• lbns B~ Tone 9v v T1~ne 3~ lbns PAPBR Neveprint 9.1 fi,000 2.8 1,0]0 1.2 300 5.7 7,360 Cotrvgnted Containeie 5.4 3,560 11.4 4,350 10.7 2,670 8.2 10,580 High-grade 1.6 920 5.0 1,910 6.3 1,570 l.4 4,400 Nixed 7.0 4,610 10.8 4,120 7.6 1,900 8.2 10,6]0 ConYmnitated 3.7 2,440 6.5 2,480 1.9 470 1.2 5,390 PIJEtiTICS Contnine[e 0.5 330 0.6 2]0 1.0 250 0.6 810 PER' 1.4 920 0.6 2J0 0.7 170 1.0 1,]30 HDPE 1.7 1,120 1.0 J80 0.1 20 1.2 1,530 Film 3.7 2,440 5.6 2,060 3.1 770 4.1 5,170 Folyetyinna 0.9 590 0.6 230 0.9 220 0.8 1,050 other n~L 3.7 2,170 3.3 1,260 16.6 4,140 5.9 7,580 Ce. Redrpticn Value 4.0 2,640 1.6 610 0.4 100 2.6 ],350 Cant~nce 2.1 1,380 0.7 270 0.0 0 1.3 1,650 Oth44' IOSTAZB 0.0 0 0.2 80 0.0 0 0.1 80 Alumimm Cen 0.0 260 0.7 270 0.0 0 0.4 530 Tile Cute 2.1 1,380 1.2 460 0.9 220 1.6 2,070 Ferrous 2.3 1,520 2.5 950 3.7 920 2.6 1,]90 lbnterrau 0.J 200 0.4 150 0.9 220 0.4 570 whits Goob 0.0 0 0.J 110 0.0 0 0.1 110 Nixed Motels Y11P N1lS1E 4.2 2,770 1.2 460 1.2 300 2.7 3,520 D Graee/leevee 24.3 16,010 5.6 2,060 1.1 270 14.2 18,140 Pnminge 3.3 2,170 0.6 230 0.0 0 1.9 2,400 NON-P11PAt OP[:INQCS Food 7.7 2,440 J.1 1,180 1.2 J00 3.0 3,920 Nord 5.2 ],{30 15.7 5,990 19.0 4,740 31.0 14,160 Tirr aid Ru6Mr 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Menv[e 1.2 790 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.6 790 Oiepoee6le 1.8 1,190 0.7 270 0.0 0 1.1 1,450 Taxtilr 1.7 1,120 0.8 310 2.5 620 1.6 2,050 Other O31$ {N16'lE 9 0.3 100 0.3 110 1.8 450 0.6 ]60 Il . BepMli 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.5 110 0.1 120 Concrete 0.6 400 8.9 ],100 9.8 2,450 {.e 6,240 ONe[ Inert Solids 0.0 0 0.0 0 5.9 1,470 1.1 1,470 Household Nea. We!. 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Finr 0.9 590 1.8 690 O.d 100 1.1 1,180 Misc. 3.fi 2,370 6.0 2,290 0.4 100 3.7 4,760 8B6CIJIL NASIES Aebrtce 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Bulky Itm ~ 0 0_0 0 ~ 0 0_0 0 TOTAf. 100 65,880 100 38,Ifi0 100 2{,%0 100 129,000 Wr not include self-heal or city/county eetvicr vaeb wurcr. 2-29 iA BLE 2-i9. OVE AA LL ANNUAL WASTE DISPOSAL RATE FOR CITY OP CHINO AESIDENTIA7. CVlOO:fICIAL IK%15 2RW. OVO W.L Wrote Sour2 Waste Source stt• W a Source Waste Ca:p~s:taor. ~4/V~ ~n9 iV V ^.bM ~'' ~ ' j lb!la ZM/V v=5 PAPP33 Na'sprinC 8.3 2,430 2.9 610 1.5 700 4.7 3,740 Corrugated rvntairers 3.9 1,140 5.8 1,210 10.6 2,150 6.1 4,500 W,ghyrnde 2.0 590 2.1 440 0.9 190 1.7 1,210 Hixed 11.8 7,460 4.B 1,000 2.2 450 7.0 4,900 Contaminated 5.0 1,460 2.6 540 1.7 340 3.3 2,350 PIA?1ZC5 fonfdl+fera 3.0 880 1.1 270 0.9 160 1.8 1,270 PEP 3.5 440 0.2 40 0.] 140 0.9 620 :•O1~ 0.5 150 2.6 540 0.4 80 1.1 ]]0 Film 4.6 1,350 6.5 1,360 2.4 d90 4.5 3,190 Fblyatyrme 2.2 640 2.6 540 1.8 370 2.2 1,550 Other 7..7 ]90 9.6 2,000 11.8 2,390 7.4 5,190 G1Jla5 Ce. padmption Value 3.1 910 1.1 230 0.5 100 1.8 1,240 Contdnere 1.5 440 1.2 250 0.6 120 1.2 810 ONer 0.5 150 0.7 150 0.0 0 0.4 290 MRTAIl. Alimimm Cva 0.6 190 0.6 130 0.2 d0 0.5 340 Tina Cana 2.0 590 1.0 210 0.3 60 1.2 860 Ferro,N 1.4 410 2.5 520 3.5 710 2.3 1,640 Nonferraua 0.3 90 0.4 80 0.3 60 0.3 230 Whyte ^. ,_ 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 !{irzed Metals 0.0 0 1.6 730 0.3 60 0.6 390 YARD ilA.ti'IS crane/leaves 13.3 7,890 7.0 1,460 6.7 1,360 9.5 6,]10 Prvninge 4.0 1,170 0.0 0 0.0 0 1-7 1,1]0 NDN-RAPER O4G11N1C5 pp~ 3.8 1,110 6.2 1,290 1.3 260 3.8 2,6]0 %bcd 4.B 1,410 13.2 2,760 12.0 6,490 15.1 10,650 Tirm and RubMr 0.0 0 2.B 580 0.0 0 0.8 590 Manure 0.4 120 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.2 120 oispoeable 2.2 640 1.3 270 0.0 0 1.3 920 'ltxtilm 3.9 1,140 1.3 270 ].4 1,500 4.1 2,910 other 1.2 350 5.7 1,190 0.8 160 2-! 1,700 Of81.1'! Wu'PL^+ Ael4u1C 0.0 0 0.0 0 O.J 60 0.1 60 Con¢eCe 4.] 1,380 9.0 1,080 10.3 2,090 7.6 5,740 Other Inert Solids 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 D tbuaelnld Hnz. Wet, 0.4 120 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.2 120 Firm 1.J 790 0.8 170 0.5 100 0.9 650 NiaC. 5.0 1,460 2.fi 540 0.1 20 2.9 2,030 S PCCIIIL 10.S'iTS Asteetoe 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Ouliry Zte1e 0_0 0 0_0 0 ~ 0 Oy0 ] 100 24,290 !90 X,880 lOG 20,280 100 70,440 Cbes rot include xlf~-haul or city/musty services vests muroes 2-30 TABLE 2-20. OVERALL 4NNUAL WASTE OI SPOSAL RATE fOR CITY OF UP LANG nes3otarrJrc momtcr3v, z2+BU Srnn+t oraurc waste Source Haute S'JULCe Haute Soucm waste Ca~paiticn 1w W TcNe ~ Tone ~ lbna ~ iC^4 PAPER !JCwsprint 6.7 2,940 10.d 1,670 1.5 140 6.8 4,760 Corzvgated coma; ^.era 4.5 1,980 4.6 740 1C.6 1,000 5.4 3,]20 High-grade 0.9 400 2.0 320 G.9 90 1.2 800 Nixed ].3 3,210 2.7 430 2.2 210 5.5 3,850 Contaminated d.9 2,150 3.4 550 1.7 160 1.1 2,860 PIASITCS Containers 0.8 350 O.fi 100 0.8 80 0.8 520 PET 0.5 220 0.3 50 0.7 ]0 0.5 370 HDPE 0.7 310 1.4 2J0 0.4 40 0.8 570 Film 2.4 1,050 3.9 630 2.4 230 2.7 1,910 Polystyrene 0.8 350 0.2 ]0 1.8 170 0.8 550 Other GI1 55 3.8 1,6]0 2.4 390 11.0 1,120 4.6 3,170 ~ Ca. ftale~ption value i.8 790 1.1 340 0.5 50 1.7 1,180 Contalnera 2.0 BBO 1.0 290 0.6 60 1.8 1,220 other 6T 0.0 0 0.1 20 0.0 0 0.0 20 M AIS Alununun Cane 0.3 130 0.7 110 0.2 10 0.4 260 Tiiv Cane 1.9 830 1.3 210 0.3 30 3.5 1,070 Ferrous 3.1 1,J60 2.5 400 3.5 330 3.0 2,100 fbnferioua 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.3 30 0.0 30 white Cuode 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Mixed Metals 1.4 610 1.8 290 0.3 30 3.3 930 YARD 14AS1E crave/reeves Il.3 9.350 16.2 2,600 6.7 640 18.1 12,600 Pnuunge 4.8 2,110 12.0 1,930 0.0 0 5.8 4, J40 WN-PAPOI 01~J1tIICS Fmd 4.4 1,970 d.0 640 1.7 120 3.9 2,700 wood 4.2 1,840 7.8 1,250 J2.0 ],030 8.8 6,130 Tires aM 2~bber O.fi 260 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.4 260 Manure 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Disposable 3.2 1,d10 1.0 160 0.0 0 2.l 3,570 :Fxtilee d.7 2,060 B.2 S,J20 7.4 700 5.9 4,080 Other O ' l ' 0.7 310 0.1 20 0.8 80 O.fi 400 T RERR O~ST 6S Asphalt 0.0 0 1.4 2J0 0.3 70 0.4 250 Con¢ete S.J 2,330 4.4 71J 1C.3 980 5.8 4,010 OfheY Inert Solids 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 tbusdnld Haz. Wet. 0.2 90 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.1 90 Fines 1.4 610 1.0 160 0.5 50 1.2 820 Nix. 5.5 2,420 1.9 310 0.1 30 J.9 2, 7J0 SPECr°T. IA`SES Asbestos 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 eullry Item Oy0 0 0_0 0 ~ 0 0_0 0 'f VIN. 100 43,920 100 16,080 100 9,480 100 69,480 + rose rot include self-heal ar city/munty e4cariwe ueeu aauroe 2-31 TABLE 2-21. OVERALL ANNUAL WASTE DISPOSAL RATE FOR CITY OE MONTCLA IR ResxDetrrxly. coroa•:acxau n+wsl 7axu, ovelv,la, :Taste 9ouree Wdate Souzee Wae;e Source %aste Cs~s_:_cr. wl:~r :brs a~ Tcne •y ^^s •v v cns PAPPJt ::eMpr ~.t 9J 1,510 J.9 450 7.0 0 6.7 1,970 _~rr;ga'.ed ConYa:ro:e 9.1 1,580 :6.1 :,31C 0.0 11.8 3,500 4igh-qr e:fe 4.: ]00 4.3 510 0.0 0 d.l 1,210 `Lixed B.0 1,390 9.9 1,190 C.C e.7 2,570 ~on smirmted 4.9 950 2.2 260 O.C 0 3.8 1,110 PLISPICS an•,ainers 1.8 310 0.5 60 0.0 0 1 J 370 P£: 0.6 70 1.Z 140 0.0 0 0.7 210 NDPE 2.d 420 1,8 210 0.0 ~ 2.1 630 Film 6.9 1,200 5.7 fi30 0.0 0 6.2 1,930 7olyetyrene 3.1 540 1.2 140 0.0 0 2.3 680 oUer 2.8 Y90 11.5 1,370 0.0 0 6.3 1,850 GIA93 Ce. Redmptinn Value 1.5 260 1.4 1'10 0.0 0 1.1 4J0 contsirmre 3.5 610 0.2 20 0.0 0 1.1 630 other 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 ATIS3 Alueunise CeM 0.7 120 0.6 TO 0.0 0 0.7 190 Tins CeN 3.9 680 1.1 iJ0 0.0 0 2.7 810 Ferrous 0.5 90 2.2 260 0.0 0 1.2 J50 Wnferrws 1.6 290 0.1 SO 0.0 0 1.0 290 Whib Good/ 0,0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Mixd Netals 6.6 800 4.6 550 0.0 0 1-6 1,750 YAPD IY1bT6 Gram /lmves 5.1 B90 4.4 520 0.0 0 /.8 I,d10 2nutings 0.1 20 0.9 110 0.0 0 0.1 120 NOtF-PAPAL O![.11NICS Food 5.5 960 2.J 210 0.0 0 4.Z 1,2.70 Waod S.fi 970 14.2 1,690 0.0 0 9-a 2,660 Tirm end Rubber 0.0 0 1.4 170 0.0 0 0-6 170 nanurs o.o a o.0 9 o.D 0 0.0 0 Oieposehle 1.6 280 0.J d0 0.0 0 1.1 310 Textiles 1.7 300 4.1 490 0.0 0 2.7 780 Other 0./ 70 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.2 70 019At 101S1ES pap~nlt 0.0 0 0.0 0 0,0 0 0-0 0 ConrteL 4.8 910 2.J 270 0.0 0 3.8 1,110 Other Inert Solids 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Rousehold Her. Wet. 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0-0 0 Finm 1.8 l10 C.9 110 a,o 0 L / 420 Miac. 5.2 900 1.J 150 0.0 0 l.6 1,060 SPLCTSl. NA91E5 ebbmtoe 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Bulky Items 0_0 0 ~ 0 0_0 Q Oy0 _ '1V W, 100 17,400 L^0 ~1, 980 0 i40 100 29,520 axe not include self-heal or city/mmey aervicm vaaG seurces 2-1 ENGINEERS - SECTION 3 SOLID WASTE DIVERSION CHARACTERIZATION STUDY I-NTRODUCTION The purpose of the solid waste diverior, charactervafion study is to identify the types and quantities of wastes which are generated within the five jurisdictions and currently diverted from landfills or transformation facilities through recycling, source reduction, or composting activities. Because existing waste diversion will count toward the AB 939 landfill diversion mandates of 25 percent by 1995 and 50 percent by 2000, documentation of existing diversion levels is essential in determining the need for new diversion programs. BACKGROUND At the present time, only the Cities of Chino and Upland have curbside residential recycling programs. Both curbside programs, initiated very recently by Western Waste Industries, are pilot programs. Several cities have instituted programs which collect various recyclables from City employees, while a number of regional buy-back centers have been located in a few of the jurisdictions and adjacent communities. There are also individuals and fines in the region that have successfully developed specialized recycling operations dealing, for example, with only a single type of waste or with speck com- mercial/industrial businesses. 3-I SCS ENGINFF¢S - PROJECT APPROACH Our estimate of the amount of solid wastes diverted from landfills or transformation facilities is based on data compiled from various sources. The State of California Depanment of Conservation was contacted regarding materials received at AB 2020 drop- off centers and regional buy-back centers. Major commercial and industrial firms (i.e., those employing 100 individuals or more) were contacted through survey forms or telephone calls. A sample Waste Diversion Survey Fore is included N Appendix C. Information recorded as a paR of this survey, in addifion to the types and quantities of wastes diverted, included the names and telephone numbers of the responsible parties contacted. Conversions from volume to weight were made using conversion formulas contained N the National Recycling Coalition Measurement Standards and Reporting Guidelines, October 31, 1989. Recycling centers located in the general area were contacted, although these centers were generally unable to provide information relative [o the percentage of materials received from any particular jurisdiction. Residential recycling programs in the Cities of Upland and Chino were unplemented in December 1990, and the materials collected during that month were included as "residential" (commingled) in Tables 3-2 and 3-3. The commercial waste stream was investigated through contacts with shopping centers and malls as well as large chain stores. Through these surveys, we can conclude that some diversion (primarily cardboard) is currently taking place. It should be noted, however, that generators maintain virtually no records of the actual amounts involved. DATA e4YALYSIS Based on the survey procedures outlined above, SCS calculated the amount of solid waste generated within the individual jurisdictions which is currently diverted from landfills or transformation facilities. These estimates are presented in Tables 3-t through 3-5 and represent 1990 data. 3-2 ENGINEERS - Tables 3-6 through 3-IO present our estimates of the total amount of solid waste generated 6y each individual source within the coalition cities. These values am based on the waste disposal rates detailed in Table 2-1 and the data presented in 'fables 3-1 through 3-5. Overall diversion Ea[es for each jurisdiction ate ptusented in Table 3-11. .n 3-3 SCS ENGINEERS - TABLE 3-1. UNINCORPQRATF.D ~6ES'PERM SAN BERNABDIIVO COiJN I'Y DIYIILS;;dN Source Category Type Annual Tons Diverted Residential AB 2020 Glass Mixed 200 Residential AB 2020 Metai Aluminum cans I80 Residential AB 2020 Plastic Not specked 10 Sub-total 390 Commercial Organic Textiles 35 Commercial Paper Mixed 25 Commercial Paper OCC 230 Sub-total 290 Industrial Metal Steel scrap 30 Industrial Organic Woad shavings 4,860 Industriai Organic Wood trimmings 100 Sub-total 4,990 Iandflll salvage Metal Mixed 490 I.andfdl salvage Organic Wood 420 Sub-total 910 TOTAL 6,580 3-4 TABLE 32. GTY OF BAN®O CUCAMONGA DIVFB.SION Source Category Type AmtW Tons Diverted Residential AH 2020 Glass Mined 210 Residential AB 2020 MeW Aluminum cans 240 Rcsiden[ial AB 2020 Plastic Not specified LO Residential Paper OCC 50 Resideotial Paper ONP 100 Suh-toW 610 Commercial Othee Asphalt 750 Commercial Other Coocrcte 900 Commercial Green Wula Tree tdmmiugs 1,106 Commercial Paper OCC 1.350 SuatoW 4,(00 Industrial Glw Cullen 210 Industrial MeW Aluminum chips 60 Industrial MeW Aluminum scup 230 Industrial MeW Cold rolled steel 53 Industrial MeW Stainless scrap 284 Industrial MeW Steel scrap 3,800 Industrial Organic Woad shsvings 96 Industrial Other Concrc4 1i00 Industrial Paper OCC 525 Industial Plastic PET 12 Sub•toW 5,870 All sources+ Paper OCC 3 All sourees Paper ONP 197 SuMtoW 200 Ianditll salvage MeW Mined 876 Landfill salvage Organic Wood 744 Sub•toW 1,620 ~I TOTAL 12,400 " Regional buy-back centers 3-5 SC! ENGINEERS - TABt.g 33 CtfY OP CFIDYO DlVLR5ION Source Category Type Annual Tor¢ Diverted Residential AB 2020 Glass Sfizrd 40 Residential AB 2020 Meml Aluminum cans 50 Residential AB 2020 Plastic Yot specified 5 Residential Commingled 10 Subtotal 105 Commercial Paper Hi-grade IS Commercial Pnper Other t2 Commercial Organic Tree Trimmings 90 Subtotal I20 Industrial Metal Aluminum raps 1 Industrial Metal Aluminum 36 Industrial MeW Ferrous 200 Indmtnal Orgamc Wood shavingf 14,882 Industrial Organic Wood waste 350 Industrial Paper Corrugated 162 indruMal Paper High-grade 4 Industrial Plastics Other 5 Subtotal 15,640 All sourcu+ Paper OCC 4 All sourcm Paper ONP 136 Subtotal 140 Landfill vlvage Meal :vtized 480 IandKll salvage Orgmic Wood 400 Subtotal 880 TOTAL 16,88s " Regiond buy-back centers 3-6 SCS ENGINEERS - FPnai'~ Nsl VT vIYnSW Dl~II01uNN Source Category Type Annual Tons Diverted Rcsidenliel AB 2020 Glare Mired 320 Residential AB 2020 MeW Alumiuum teas 200 Residential AB 2020 Plastic Not specified 20 Residential Commingled 30 Sub-tatnl 570 Commercial Organic Wood !pallets) 29 Commercial Paper High grade 6 Commercial Paper ONP 1 Commercial Paper Cartlhovd 503 Commercial Plasic Film I Subtotal 540 Indmtrid MeW Aluminum stop 50 Industrial MeW Ferrous scrap 50 Industrial MeW Stainless stop AO Industrial Organic Wood waste 1,000 Iadmtriel Organic Waod shavings 7S0 Sub-total 1,970 All soucw+ AB 2020 Glees Mired 250 All sources AB 2020 MeW Aluminum cam 270 All soutcra MeW F<trom stop 320 All sources Paper Mired IS All sources Paper OCC 48 All sources Paper ONP 887 Sub-total 1,790 Landfill salvage MeW Mired 466 landfill selvage Organic Wood 394 Subtotal R60 TOTAL 5,730 * Regional buy-back centers 3-7 SCS ENGINEERS - TABLE 33. CTfY OF MONTCLd18 Dt13EERSHIN Source Category Type Annual ToFSs DirMed Residenisl AB 2020 Glass Mixed 245 Residential AR 2020 MeW Aluminum cans 255 Residential AB 2020 Plastic Not spaified IO Sub-toW 510 Commercial Organic Tree trimmings 100 Commercial Metal Ferrous l34 Cammemiel Paper OCC 736 Sub-toW 970 All sources' Paper Mixed IS All source Paper OCC 40 All sources Paper ONP 525 SubtoW 580 Landfill salvage MeW Mixed 200 Landfill vlvage Organic Wood 170 SubtoW 370 TOTAL 2,430 'Regional buy-back centers 3-8 SCS ENGINEERS _ C,merator SGUra Wastes DispasM (Table 2.1) Wastes Diverted ffabk 3.1) Wattes Cene+ated ToW Pacmt of Tohl Resideotid 36,760 NA 38.760 47 Comme¢ial 13,320 290 (3,610 16 IadustrisV CAaatNCtiea 22,200 4,990 27,190 33 Gtxn Wute NA NA Strxet Maiateoana NA NA AB 2020 Col- lectioa Cealen 390 390 Rcgioaal Buy- Back Ccnten NA Self-Haul Idda 3,120 3,120 4 Caadfill Salvage (910) 910 TOTAL 76,490 6,580 87,070 I00 " All value expressed is toss per Yeu, i;: 3-9 SCS FNGINEE0.5 - TAB'LL 17. ROTAL WA$TE QUANT[HES GffiEffiGkTA~ ~ THFi CtCY bF RANCHO CUCAIHONGA• Generator Waste Warta Wades Percent of Source Disposed Direrled Generated Tofal (Table 2-I) (Table 3-2) Total Residential 65,880 150 66,030 44 Commercial 38.160 1.350 39,510 27 Industrial/ 24,960 5,870 30,830 20 Canstmction city Gmea Wute 700 1.100 1,8E)D 2 City Shat 2,200 1,650 3.850 3 Maintenance AB 2020 460 460 Coll«tion Centers Regional Buy- 200 200 Back Cen[ers Self-F{auI Loeda 5,400 5,400 4 Isndfill Salvage (1.620) 1,620 TOTAL 135,680 12,400 148,080 100 • All values ezprcssed in tom per yea. ~w 3-IO $CS ENGINEERS - to 33: tarn. w~s~i?e~c>dua~w~r~s ceteT~n HYT~4~rYUFC9Qi6'a~ Gepn>,lpr SOU[f! wasua Disposed (Table Lq wa5res Ili~pYed (Table 33) wastes Cmesated Total Pes~cml or TOlal Resideptial 29,280 10 29,290 32 Commercial 20,980 30 20,910 23 Ipdwtrial/ COpSWCIIOp 20,280 15,640 35,920 39 City Grtep Waste 380 90 470 City Street Maiptepmce 1,750 L750 2 AB 2020 Col- lectiap Cmten 95 95 Regiolul Buy- Buk CwteEa 140 140 Self-Hml LoRd~ 2,880 2,880 4 lapdfill Salvage (880) 880 TOTAL 74,570 16,885 91,455 100 • .411 value expressed ip tops per year. 3-ll SCS ENGINEERS - T:+~x aa. mrw~, wnsrE 6`ENPRAT>~ QT'fH~ crrx oa u~.,u~ Gmetvtor Source Waste Disposed (Table 2.1) Warts Diverted (Table 3-0) Wastes Gatvatad Total PermEt of Tatal Residential 43,920 30 43,950 57 Comme¢ial 16,080 540 16,620 21 IpdusMsl/ COp9tNCNOp 9,480 1,970 11,450 IS cry creep w.ate soo soo City Street Maiptepepce NA NA AB 2020 Col- lectiop Cepters 540 540 l Regippd Buy- Rsclt Ceplers (,790 1,790 2 Self-HRW made 2,880 2,880 4 I~ndfill Salvage (860) 860 TOTAL 72,000 5,730 77,730 100 * All values ezprrased m tops per Yeu. i,: 3-12 SCS ENGINEENS - rAHLE3d$. ]'(YPAL Wd&TEE~tJ~arriLr>r~sC$N~A'1'8D DV THE CCI'Y O! MONtCLAIRa Generator Waste Wastes Waslrs Percept of Source Disposed Diverted GeEeEaled Total (Table YI) (fable 3.0) Total Rcsideotial 17,400 17,400 53 Commercial 11,880 870 12.750 38 Industrial/ 240 240 COpSINCIiOp City Grern 100 100 Waste City Street 750 750 2 Maintenance AB 2020 Col- 510 SIO 2 lecsion Centers Regiopil Buy- S80 580 1 Back Centers Self-Nnul loads 1100 1,200 4 Landfill Salvage (370) 370 TOTAL 31,100 2,030 33,530 100 ~ All values expressed m tons per year, 3-13 SCS ENGINEfRE - TABLE }!1. DiVLrRSl1011{ RATE3 Jurisdiction Waste Dislrased (torESlY~') Wute Diverted (tons/year) Total Waste Generated (tons7ymr) Diversion Rate % of Total Uninc. Cnunry 76,490 6.580 83,070 7.9 Rancho Cucamonga 135,680 12,400 166,080 8.4 Chino 74,570 16,885 91,-053 18.5 Uplmd 72,000 5,730 77,770 7.4 Montclair 31,100 2,430 33,530 7.2 3-I4 SCS FNGINFERS - SECTION 4 WASTE GENERATTON FORECASTS Lr'I'RODUCTTON AB 939 and its implementing resolutions require that a 15-year projection be prepared to estimate the quantities of waste (by category and type) which could be expected to be generated, diverted, and disposed of by these jurisdictions under existing condifions and under conditions proposed in the SRR Elements. METHODOLOGY Our waste generation forecasts are based on projected growth rates for each jurisdiction, using data provided by the City Planning Depanment's General Plans and demographic information, U.S. Census data, California Department of Finance population data, Southern California Association of Govenunent (SCAG) housing projections, and land use maps. Residential Growth Rate The anticipated population growth rate for the next IO years and information sources are as follows: 4-I SCS ENGINEERS - Jurisdiction Anttual Population Growth Rate (Percent) Information Source Montclav Chino Upland Rancho Cucamonga Unincorporated County 1.2 4.0 3.6 4.6 2.5 1983 Montclair -General Plan 1990 City of Chino -Demographics 1989 City of Upland -Housing Element 1988 Rancho Cucamonga -General Plan 1990 SCAG Estimates The projected waste disposal rat have been calculated for the residential waste stream in each jurisdiction by multiplying [he base quantity generated (for 1990 as determined in this study) by the population growth rate. Commercial and Industri 1 ['rowth e Commercial and industrial development are dependem upon economic factors which are extremely d~cult to analyze or predict. Where possible, we have relied primarily on data provided by each individual jurisdiction in preparing these estimates. Whenever we were unable to obtain relevant information or to draw meaningful conclusions from information provided, we have assumed a probable growth mte, assigned a percentage (gore to individual waste streams, and predicted growth on a straight-line basis. For the City of Montclair, the commercial and industrial growth rate was assumed [o be nearly approximate to the residential growth rate of 1.2 percent. For the Cities of Chino, Upland, and Rancho Cucamonga, the commercial generation forecast was based on land use estimates. In these cases, we divided the percentage increase in acreage dedicated to industrial development between 1990 and 2005 by 15, and multiplied the base commercial generation quantity by the resulting figure. For the unincorporated area, residential growth was projected at 2.5 percent and commercial growth at 1 percent. In all jurisdictions except Montclair, industrial genemtion was assumed to increase astraight- line 1 percent per year. 4-2 DATA ANALYSIS SCS ENGINEEFS - Our estimates of the amount of refuse expected to be disposed, diverted, and generated within the five jurisdictions over the next IS years under existing and proposed (AB 939) conditions are presented in Tables 4-1 through 4-5. These start with 1991 and show anticipated growth beyond the 1990 data documented earlier. 4-3 Im O P Z~ Off', ~3i =0' QO ' ,g z a 00 iv oa i `~' o ' ~u~' z_ l~E hs~ =9 o~ ie oA =_s' ~Ui V W8i ~O~ QO >_, =8 z a o• oy' X31 0 aa8 .z; ~d ', <x zgi ~ni 0 ae ~ ~v~y Cc ~e ~ r~o~e ~ `E :, ;, _~ _._ .. ~ ~,~ ~ Y _ mM1 mss- _. a8m a n - n - r ~ _ 6 ., _ a n n m ~~ ,. o 'n r Hr oo ~=„ 00 '~O OaOO o~: op o i ~.: ~~ N °, ^R e _ TN _. wpm a. a~ ;° _ m oooeoo o n _ N N z '$e _ ~~ _ - ~o o z 'o n _ ~ i ~ ~ m =-0 ~ ~ v ~ a ' Vg ~ 0 3 me E - .E c .x,z'__<° `owcEiF~ ~ =2°=:€i8' ` °^F'~@g'5"g„~SS ~~-''?~ ; z i2u- 2 ~)yUn~uiO ~ _ n °o ¢ °i3i 000LLT~°]OrOtSVOEi SN$S i ` o T z o 4-4 Za _ _ e ZV O U p v~~i . v_ n n .'v ~ v_ rt ~N oG ~ ~ a O L ~ °i ° ^ _ n iz ', x~ _ _ - ao _ oo' 7Vi Z vO~~ aJ- O 60 0'~ O ^ Ooo~oo ..~ ~ 2 % ry ~ ° s e -Q NC ~% ~~~ ~~n :.rn r m}vn n.n' a~n j~i cn nrv -rv -~ n -~ nm m• np a C O? inn nrv -N - n - av N~ nH - 7v ' L zvi V spa ry0o O o0 0 ~E ~O~' -N u oo eV Nam ~. ~ Oi „O ;o og~~ e~ ~~ -r - -, - wN H. ~ a ~&' z ~~~ _ry eoa o - o0 oa oo~o 0o m ee o0 ao ~ H ~ h i a~° o ~ i ~~i r zo mh ., ~, - -, - a. ^m~ r. ~ - on = o c c ~ _ _Y m 3 _ V ~n ;'~a pF F, ~ E£ HE= 5So"as S.°< ~ 3:s°P~ 3ez z w yC, a=e i.o~¢g"°EEa i4 `mx.'~`€z $$o`8~~=g}},o~3teW8' ' m iz°uzs~<8 k'x BSS~~S..~a ~i3lYOiow3:]o..orYu oz-sN7~ - < c o s z o - 4-$ i= ~mr _ _ - - e° o - h a ., _ _ e a " OV U °og~ eN$o a ~ _" .. .. N ~~ eoem aoeo eo t z~' ro. - - ~- ~ -• ag J Rr, a _ amn ry ~v ~, ~i - ° Z j ~ n n :v ,v n Y .- rl x ry n ]tl n ~9 - „- - ~saa_ - e~°_ °e _~ o ' uy _y- - oeo -o v°.o oa ° eooaoo - T i i . ~ n rv .~ N ^ , .fig', _ n%°,m aa° - n~.n - $i 'Re ° Z~ ~n na rv n -n - n - n. n - ~m aims ~ ~ :smmRa ~~ xaa ~~o~g: ° :3' 0 U nW°g; n ~ ~ R8° ~_ 'R 8° RJR°RA° g~ge°° ° _ a '~s'a ~' ~~.-°~, r ^'~"= .~° nom' v$ ma °S: °$: i6 -.. ~:~ r ~ r ~- ~:- r. °- oa ° pg' mn -,v ~ -n m .. n n .. - - rvr nn ~ c~, ~V~' V y - 000 ~aa oo ee o ooooea pc _2_s n n ° e D _ _ ~ 'C9 ~e n$m san 3~io -~~ ~Rn aSn°$~ e° O ~n~~ mr moo, _H ~ _~ - - em,- N. .n _ s 0 ° ~ ~ W£'" ~ =w `o~'Fm`~zv~i"c~a ~"~z'OO~g~F'"~o~s o~v"°$ J az°~rZU~uns nb5u~b '.~°.i3~~~2i.?.aa.°.os2~u~ aa2~ ¢ - ~ i' o m = 4-6 m r =a - - U aOj~l n-n.."~ arv n -O ~t _ - _ oo O ~ aO •n ~ ~~ m ~~ e a ~ O .~ 2~ h ..rv ' rv c '~On v - n~ nn.. Y~ :rv- f a0 Otl n 7' =q O m~ 9t~~.0 - 00 OU91i Z ~~4 - oa0 p0 ~O c0 ap O O OOOOea c.~. aogi ~ n r _ a~ <~_' wa Y°9'~ ~emgr g_ ~ ~ RB.~v - e~o N. e~6o 0 Win., -- om - - _- a zo `~~I - mg.:gym o ~o'i i -°. h n$.R: ~ - mR.e a~ z , 0 .u~i « _ o00 0 _ -o0 00 0 ~ oeeooo 0 qig i N n N ., r o aH~l w z c 9Oyi 'a$a .,,=~$.~r ., _3$n $,~°RSe '8 '.gam o °n o'~ o `o x x s ~ Y ~ - C 3 0 `s 0 8 ~° ,"~ o " i~-~i~N OFa~ng QFE= _;~~ Yooo~Qe~i ~f ~pqw : - ~iu°f 9u6uixLL4 o`S a$o s-_'z `>.i*unp~3C s"a.o.73o z°~xNa~ y U ] Y O a 4-7 _° - °° - IUi O L ' ` ~ ~ 8a °° ° m~ v - nn n ~ -fin ° - .. _ n _„ ~ a ~O~ a- .. •~ e n 60 T i n~ o ' g v Winn ' _ ~ Z n_ .v n - rv~ n. rv .. .. _ 7~ n S O r OV U°A _ 000 0 oe ec ° °oooo0 0 $O n ~ rv ry of ~ ~~_ n QhO, h=g~ mnry a-_ _ -nRp- e~ Z~R ryg° ry - °° o @ _ _ -^ - a a °-"y ~~ .a .Y -° ° - _. - - «. -ter - m °z u~', 0 °' R'emm A°"g'm Re°ma mg :Y:'~:m 9&~,m°° ° n Qo r'a „_ -n r N~"°,' Yh° -.N'm--°.° °g °m_°v:° -.. _ o r i'~o m ° _ _ ^$o mg° ZVi O mU ~ _ OOO ° °O 00 O mV~i N rv ry n„ ~ 000000 ° '-' z 3 ° ~ ~ aNO _ sa min aYir YR R: mg° ' age m.n m- e ° _ ~° _ is .r. _H n - _° .. - - n -~rv .. a of ~ r z s ~ 0 3 m ¢~ a ugua °z EBoS ~,ioa Z'~2;i~u'~z°' v Ei ~~o~n~8 x' ~~ a 4z°u°si o z T iz~3:io.ooTucz ~N2 al 4-8 z3' - o 20', °o pR am .rv -n - - _ _ n -.n _ '~~i 2 O ~~Uy H ~ 'mop ~ 00 00 OOao ~ oaao~0 0. o V Y F H n ~ .Z Q'Iji ~~~i my an Dm ~,n n ~~n -.n .. m~n N PqN e~iR O~ 7C a O ~ OV U _ 'OPT '~R~ ~~ a ao ~ °s r R~ o0 00 _ a °N~i nvf N - rv m_ .e GOB ~ n yK K9 - _ ONra '~'~ me~' _ o 8'i . - vhn - ~o mph ~ Rm Rn~or ~~~ Za oYm ~n- n - h°~ `N Om A •N ~n n _ ... ^ f NN _~~y _ mi _ g=toJ ..Y v a0o ry e v " ~0 00 N O ' o00opa ~.~ ` a N_' Z p Sn ~P.. -nom m~ &u~Pi ~P _ O °fl~ me .n u -n ~ ~ _ _ __ nr _.. ~, a. of o 0 ° e Y ~ ~ _ ° ? o ' ~ ~ 63 w _me ° e EC ~ .`i5=~g w ua ~ ~ ~° a^i ^ W' ~a ~^° : °3 a ~ w~ a w iwa.£``WO~og'^ ?g`Fa =a °.o °. ?ioSC~gvF oP~~:uB~ x yivx4 u°6u°Oax..so~~~~o~a.`~i3is u`ai.3:'So:o~~uox SNa~ 4-9 in - o V _ w+'~~ ,-mv n v3 _ _~ooe oo i 0 Ycg~ _ -, ego _m8R = _ off' s ~U 2 ~ 0 0 ono Vz9 w rv on n n n oo » d o 0 00 00 ` K~~' .x - mo - ~o o°~i ~~m - o-- __ i~ .n -~ n ~~ ..~ n ~ _- wr _wn m ai i~ _ - ~$$~,~ na'a __ N~ eke ' '.$ oa ~ n ^rv~ 08' V _ nP~i ~$e ~~Pn n -Sim w .. r o0 0 ,a ~°ypQ vin n - n a- u n QO i~ Y3 :a rv mxa msa Oc ~ iN Nnn Zu Mr ~ n Qq - ~Qq n- .n.. N/I n n .pim~rv° ebin nE am, o~tl - o' 2i b ~n N O`a a.- en ~n ~ - - non env Ctii 2 O nUg~ NO ~ o0a o CO CO cOO COOCao OC ~' Z 4 .. N Y .. ~ _ O_ 6'/iP p Sc m$Prv ~i n~P - ^Vi ~S b~C V p h i m b. n c V U Z n +n ~n n - -5 Y N.'. .~nH ~p - ~ n O O C p ~ z _ _ _ _ v > <i 3G ~ -'~ i C E E C --® i Y o s ; Q E ~T:¢,n~,"no~^., °a:'Ew °~"=E~c'-`=:''7~i `=°o ~~~px~gg =Fr~B' z m 6z~zx~gud z~.d Sguuo '=°i3ig3>nw 3: s°ar o".~.~35s-ii<~ - q V E 4 a 2 O N - 4-10 =d - - - ~~: e~° °° 0 6omf nn a _ n N~ a'~a°d _ °_ '~'vni.~ ~n 3e °° ev - n w°oi _Y,~_ a~~ e~=c o0 )Qi N c~'i o ' „u _ eo° ~vo - °o °° ° oe°e°o °v ?U VV~ rv " N n _ ~ y ry2oj u ~ Qa ' _ Z _ Ng°~h ° U Z~~ a~ +~a n ~a n -_ _n p _ _ rvn .~aN - ~ J O C ~ j g y ~ C G o U3 w C g Eqq N "~mw8 ¢ 9 a w ~= Q i _ 5°~v~Y£ w $q h° `~e3'~5'cvv $.~ ; ug ¢w9 z w a£?my° w°oe-°'Ea~`~iE°_'=_: ,". §z=°o~,~cEi~~8g~6°m ~ m az°~ia~?ui x: ~o„uu°o a':uz33~v`o~3~ZOr o.-d~~oi x d' ' ¢ > :.. S r z O H a 4-II oA _ __~,.z ,h _~z ~ ~ _ _~ a~ _. _ _~ 0 - V vOa n^ 'j ~ o> >0 00 ~? N ^,v 1n n JZ '~ ~Qi . _n .. _ ,y _ QO '_ ~~ J4 ..n _9 _ _ i- ..y n ry _ _N .oN .. .. ' Sry ~n 2r rv9n n p=i _ .-_n_m nN -nm n ry _ti mn -+ - =U ;yU 3 ~ -0 _ a » a0 0000 00o p _ i ax 4, -N M1Y h n ~r m _ aN~ Y 6~ - .n a~e '00 _ ~P ym _ pa rv _ I ' ~o ~ _a ~~ n _ v~i 0q O _ f ~~~` m~ . _nv nt ry m _n m 20 O ~_ "' ' ~'x H 00 00 00 ~p ~ ~'~ nn n '~ _ <g°~ f w~ Og tCAU i ' __f_n. n~ ~, n rv nrv ~n _ ~? .v _ mOn _ 0' 00 i ~a 2 pQ` Y _ f ~ n- }m ~ N _ -n yn nn ~3, = o8 o~ & ooe ogeoo gN oaooooo ~gooao 0 . a ~zy ~ v ~ ~.. Y, ~ _ i ~ -o _ a 4 _ ~Oi Oo z - - _.,_~ n- ,.- -~ ~n eN _ - - n @ a c u s ~ 8 B~ H _ s W fi ~ $x" W £ 2 wt~ae WE-~,~'n c~a s -~°,CV s~ M~ 0~~ .'i~r~ ~ _ z°uzx,igu~°~_°oa ,~u5~ a=_z3i~o`ao R~~io~o'~ 7~os ~ `'io<.*. _ U ~ 2 O ut 4-12 09 _ _ _ -- __ i4e =~ IV O i _O' .a_ - r e n . _ w QO }; s. _ _ _ __ _ _ >> _ ~a " - _ i a _ - ' _ o - 4i~ - - --m-a ... -rvm a ~ - 'o. ~rv _: ^V 2 O eoa _oo ,~-oo., -_ _oo _ooco ooe =o a-~° - YSO ~ o z, - e m. rv . r .:~ u a ~ " - zo°O' 0 rog~ rte= - ~ ~- ti iio - o a is - - ~Se n8 :`~~&e o~ og'. _ _ __n_m .N -na r _ -n an -. =c' z °~ ~_ o__ _ - o~ o~oo _ ~a~ ~_ U ~ rt ry vi N n ti q ~t _ v ~ _ iN - o~h o S81 ..-D ..a 'I .. rvn • -N ~n .. '~ _ ] Q - .. rv v' e x _ ? v e c = ? s ' o ~ hi w - ~* Hd € "' i''P~ `wa&~~ of<E~'~2 :0"~ 8$~~'~~WgeY'~F u . m iz`u`ix~6$axwvos~uoi~~:i3i~~3ni~3c?o~oo$uo s° i'N<~ 4-13 N7 '~ry° ° Im - Os _- - ~-nu-z vu ~nm v v ~ ~n av -a O'y 2p O d~u - rvrv ~O 'Xv0 0° °o a2 j_ v'-~ ~ m-9 n- -t ~ - rv ~ .-m 7' Na o~o i8i m~ '>> OaF ~.. .v N.•a .Y -rvm s _ --lv rrv -a 7V O _ bU9 >> ~ OOO CO ooJO nOOOO ~° .-.-'„U~ N hrv n ^ nin n - <y~ ~ a _ _ n _ c o - - n~~ ~,~, aa° :~ ° zo° 0 ~l~~ pgR °aR°" 8° :SS° 8~ - ~S°° °° ° <o. 'z°' - J ~U ao a0a - 00 Oa°O - '~°o a0 qp~' ~ rvrv a nV1 m 2 - _ v r ~ ~ O_ 6N~ >Y 2 Y v - - _ _ _ O O Z° -- -m vrv • v ~n ~n -m ~ ~ rv - - o 7 ~ C ~ j 4 - ~ ,6 C ; s. , `v o N o,q y _ Jm s ~ ~qw~ ~ ~ w ~ Q ,y `_ F~ ° ~ cC o~ d i ¢ _ poi _ + wi'-: - ~~ __'a E'+_c~:o mi?8oi$wgt ~oP~gGU . ;~ . _ m iu°if,~<G o<~~oid~+i3ZQ,iS O,.3cao~o Y~o sax a a z o N a-ia 2. _ _ ~ C4i ~._ nn~m nn ~ n n fIn P 2V Y O U o~ ~ _- iYn in _;~g= $o a o0 0 „' a6m', f n .. .. n _n,n ~~ n m a ~O '.~~ na v -y± a~i 2a "n +~ ~-m n ~ a __ _ n n_ -a >O ~~.o hol pg~ __ _ N~-r nn ~ n n ..n to -a~ "s3', ° ~o o-o De vooo ago 0 m=m~~ -y n nn n ~n a aN~, ~K r~~,, __ _-N~_m :'" n. "gin ~m« w ~ - o. ..__~_ _ _na ~ n - c Y~ __ n o a n . w n n m =3' o .gip', eR,°n, ~~ ~~ 8: o A& o0 o S` a"oar _ __ n ~~ a e ~ , ~a °o' D n m _PB~~N n~oN~n. ~~°&m, ~o o~~, z 0 ~u - ~a o00 00 oooeo ovo 0 _'z n n - o aH° Asa oo - ~g angry - a8 °~°8~,m z ~_n~-a ,n n. .nN ar m - ~n _~ _ n - _ 0 r Y P wY'ae~%n`wo~aB`^°~~FaE°_`=3 ~s a~i3$'^, $BrEr~o?~Fn"8" = yiu`z~u'~guax uo~~~o~2:.°i `3 xi6ni~. 3:ib~~oo oa iy8~ 4-IS _~ - - ~a~ - - ,~ ~o _ 0 U N~ ntt ~u inn _ ~ '-.- Oo 20-. v n Q. O y s~i rv- ~~ ,bvn 'mi~e - - ~ 2, nn va m-T rv ~ r ~- um vn -~~ vm JOi r is - - a~Yn ee p~ _ _ -rvna- n,v ~ ~n ~ r v.v _ vm Z~ v O _ __ ~V'~', '~ y ~ nrv ~o _'O nn a o_oo p7C o YZ n aN~ ATV _ 00 ag - g' za~ mga~ _ ~ R' a^o..m~ _ o _ z V TO;~~ n~~ •~ Su ng~b ~m o~am O ac oe <~~~~ P -- N -ryn ry _ ^mo ~ ~ w0 i rRo .~ ~e~ ~ ~g~~ Sb °R~m~ ~~: o0 `o 8'I oa o' a ,~ z a~ _ oo eea o~ eooo 000 .m,u~~ ^' ~N a nr a a L v n f 2 O ~N~ Z ~ ~ i rv (~ N O J C 3 - C - V `S a rJ ° v ` ~ O ~ ~ i~ H S ~ c `'° E € SF a ;°" ° '< ~ v y ¢~`-'`"e "~`m rwagoFN£+3 'sF ~~ _2 °ni q§z R:~o~L`w~v~g2vW Sa' _ m a~c°~ix~s,~n x..do5u u°o~~. °F;aa,iti~3:x ~o"o 2u°oz zyZ~ _ a _ ~ _ 4-16 e. - _~~a e~- _ ., ~~_ _ _ Zfj ~.. .. - O F Y G ~.^. ~' ~ vln n ~ oo ~c S~ zS rvl ..e n-_ NY r n- ,..~~ __ om __ ~ '"'tim _ en - e _ . -H~~ c~', z o N~{i oo n oee _ 00 ooeo _ooe o0 ~O ; -i tv ~ N nn a - Q~j YC °~i ~~~~n - JO Z v a uin nn n -rvn~ ain U' Om ~£~ ~arvs _ ~n tv ~ _ ~n -~V e1- _ _ e E [J ~ n rv v O ~Oy~i n~a ~~ -~ ea'J ry 00 O rO a __ ~ n [+in N n f r QO '^4~ rv(` N~9 e 24 nn va a - nrv n n n- wP nn- ~ _ ~C 2e _` ~ ~~. S~~ e Ja -- .. ~M1lvm hrv n .' n nn.. .. ou '.. o Nips Y oe n eee nn 'o~eoo or m eeeo aoo 00 = He ', SK Z "e'; ~a:^~~ ~=_ -_m~e e3. - eta _ --- m ~e ;° __ - -.gym _ ~~ ,~ ., ~ -r„_ ,~e^° ~, - ~ - _ - a ~ i - N ~~ v C B~ ' ~9F3 '~ ~ Y Q N+ 3oE w ii _'a°e~ ,`vo~_">. _3 apdE'° ?9~'2 ~~ °:~ o~'Su~~`- ~ i$u3ic43 u°sx...i o5 u'~owi:-~°-3isoaofr3~~o..o:Z~oi 'iy2a - Q U S Y 2 O - 4-t7 o~ NO ~ - ea _~„„-_ a~ -Y - _ „ -. z~i __ V ~ _ ~ v0; _ <~ Y o$ o V n 1- -_ S nT 'N a ~ ~n ' in ~o nn - i n v P J Ar R~ ~ i% _„Ha e'~~ e _ -N _n~- ~ _ , ay, _N _ - i° - co 0000 $a o00 0 o _ ~ oo~ a oU9 ~ n v2 _~ <? Y ~ Oo sy>~ un D n~nm fV _tv r7_ ' _ - y Z~i ~Y -v~.T-~ ~ o: _rna _ e.. ~ ~ n N .Y -~ - ~~~ o _ ~, 00 00 ~ a _. _ ~ `O } g m~o _ _ ~~ a ~ n_ ~~" _ _ ie~ „~ P ~, -, ..~ ., - _ °~ o m _ -, ° `~' - 0 - oe o00 ° 000 = i erg 0o vao ~ ~~ m '"^ - ~ , 4 u - ++ _ _ ~ az _ Nc' z o _ y _& ~~ _ -n~- ~ mw ogi _h„„- .:~ ~r a H ~ - .. z o? _ - - ~ z C _ ~ ; v ' ~ N c 4 _ = o a `• No ,~ u ,J " ^ a~..5 ~ 3 y _ y c BR y a Eas&a ~ q og ~ ; E am- 63~','., ~u~ > ~~ °3 =° ' o ° ^z '~ ~ j ~i? ~a ~ o gN a ~9c B e~ i&i ~ 3~i X iW i u 0` 1 w 3<3aiLL~og~u 3 z3 si a.Pi3 o :loai 0 ,~ _ , ~ ' ~ a 4-18 w m __ '__ -__ _ n~= _ R i . rv rv - v _ _ ~ - _ _ a . n ~ n . _ _~ v O `~N~ rvv Nv .~ ~n~ on~N ~M1 ne o0 a°o'Oi .n _ ~ ~ _ ~ n 0 ~a °o s8; z o _ __ _ _ n~ ~U ~_ V r ~ r~.~ P - ~M1 V~o ~.. N ah0 ~ n u ~ -~rv -.' ~ Z ~: __ _ v, Ym, .C~n U p$i __ _ rvrva _ nn ~-,o n -rvn~ _ ~ G n N ~ O a 0 n ~ _ J F - n V q \ n r S $ g w y t ~S. c a P "mamas m6 ce 3~-0a 4~ 3oE ;,£': °o.'W?E"°m~~c~__-'=:o Ali°OO-e°~g'"`of SgSu°_ i <i °~~f V4VSxu. .'PouuVO `£3i„JdoLL3~i'o rOx$VOS-Six' i` z n ~ _ 4-19 m r im o8R °^.~6 'm i$ o noE ~ N - _ v _ o n o . co o p ~bal _ ZO _ + ~ w'O Yi8 .~n~p„'.-~. _ ~-~ _ n ~R~ my _ _~?_ n _°q oa' - :Red ~:a aSm ~~ ..o-,~ ~R`e ~o og~~ .,.-ter _ ~-~ - - mr ~'~"" "_ '" 3a 0 ~~, _ _ _ _ ~ ~ o ox ~a~0 oao~oo 0 ='s -- 4h j°~ -~ n rv• _ eo Zp e._mn - ~-n ~ - mn n_ m n >o _ Y ~~ uano~ ~ ~~rv . - n~n ~ ~i~ O . rv _ tO~i n. -.n tv ~ n..n ~ ~ rv n rv~ in n m U Pw2' «r _ .m - 8= e o oq o~a ~e ^S~ o0 0 $ ~ i6° Wo z~ ug~~ ~.-rN . ~_~ ~ _ .~ r r- r ~ a i~ °;~~ __ o o ~ e o~ o000 oaoooo 0 mz z _ a <W - i = ~n _ ~i o 0 C ~ £ ~ e ~ ~ A >' s 8 e 6, N 38 ~ -° a ... ,,8 i o ~ e Z EC ~ Sin w ~ xa 30 S'S; ~ewo€iFm FaE'--_;s:~i °e$m=$i F`w Ygi~~b°s' _ iz"-a~9uaz'8o~uu°OO ~« :?z s}~i6 o~°.S:ior orz.$u°o z° a'~Z~ V 7 Z O N 4-20 Dw an-n~v + _ ~ ..rv ~ an yrv a a 2 l] ~ 7 V _ ~Si x tVn ~ a na ° ~~• 'GT- - °~ o° ;O~ ~" _ _ v aCy on' - X ~j 2 epg ° _- n o n ° -coo o__oc_ >> ~YY __ a m < ~l ~ Yr° e8e °' °~I _ s °z~ 0 z°= ~ _ . y'g ~ _`3~ °~°'~ aim am-, ry n. - ^8A= °o ~a is ___ '~ n. c~, ° _ _ ooc - o ° °o° ao8 __ n o n° ~ 0 00 o eo 0 ;, ~ _ °- .~ - - 880 °e o n ~ ° 4 _ n _ 'c_ __ ~ = ,`l 5 B S y '; w x J Wi~_,- y$E~pa d';~2'y~_z s'~s ;;i'a, 'g"3$-~i2og9"~~u8' m iz°u a3~~~n x,. n'o?,~u ud~°i?sa sp°3.~'.~0.-0 2uoi Sa2~ Q V ]f Y 2 O ul .. 4-21 " n ~c u O P GMi v/~inVrv .. ~ u -.. Y 4N aih y ~~N N -m 'D Z3` O V ~o 'o~ _~ `~ , ~t~ __ - - ~ ~ e o m oo~0 000000 0~ -`g aN io _ __ o0 oA .n-h'n ~ ~- _ n _n ~,. ~r n --mom e i~:, 0 u .,off, °as~ ~. r., ~' Y e~oo e~ a m~.~ ~psooo o '~''"4' - oryo - Qa_ rr yoa Y?g rRnB saw ~ _r8m ~: ~n_ mA ~~ c - rmh p yq! an-nrv - n.•u - -rv mn h +nn w a O tJ i ^ 2 Q .. ~Uii bQ~n a^a0 _ ~ O ~ a a& 0000 Oo00a~ c p2 ~_ b SN I }CV aP a~$n ^.~rvi at~ ~ n~i~n a0 ten'; .~_.,r - .,_., _ __ a _ _,N e ;I m a c o e g~ 4 S o a " ~ w _~a a C a EC i ~m S w ~ S r "9 ~QE i~o a~iu°€~g"~=F,a~,E' ='9s a;z °go$~4 g`sP~~~E n"a8s' 6i~ii u°~ n°o5u'uoWa~`i 3`irodo R?:i~.°-o s.~~ior~.aa 1.~ _ v o x z o H Q-22 _= - - - - ~r - _ _ o~ 4EI .h-u~ .. _.ne __ -° an ~ -nom .. .• C 2V, ~ JO .O v a09 nt~'~ aNbrv _ '~ ~ c.. v rl n a Qi7i O O~R~ ~_ '~; arv -rvb nvaa n.v ~rv~n nn ~n:J n a a ~e' 0 00 .r_e~ - ...na ~_ .n~~0 ary 08'9 -0n ~ - au99 o _ ~ 0 0000 0000=~ 00 m V~~ .. ~ b a n m a"Y ~- _ ~z zo .0..e0 - ~.0 -- ~ a o' im nr '~~ eRA:. 0 oA ,~ e~ ~ ~..e ~_ -H mrv N ~0 _ - =31 z°o~ Y~ n - <o z o oo ', is 0 _•"° -- -n~$° e~ --nom 0Rr - 00 om ~r~a. v _ ~o£ _- _ 0 _ ,~ 0 0 a 0 a - oeoo 000000 oe o °'z> a:°' _ z >00 v c _ - s _ o ~} _ ~ Q 9 ~ ~ C 7 a pp ¢ ~ ~ r N x c _ a n E U _rq Y o Q a^u _ w ~ w£ab,$z~e.o~"P'"`~~F<~£=E°~,~ m~8-pi~oF~g"n ~Ef m az~4x~5~=x..8o~du'oFa~°$~~r~3si33:. s"S:ooTuox°-a N2~ a 4-23 Qov, Y °° s8 as ~- ... _„9m~r -.~ e:"e N - _ app ~ e ~ ~° - - n - ~ - - :~e __ - _" n _°v ~ =V O ~°~~, ti_ _ _ _ ~ ~ ° ° °°°° °°°°°° °° '-<~~ - - ~~~ .s_e„ - _.H„ __ _ ° -ter o u ' aop, a an $n n ~~° ~^ ~aa ~a°°° ° oc ,._, - - - ~_ ~ x <g off'. z °~~'~ ~ _ o - ° ° o& ao°° oee°°° ° yC a_ - O - 0 z - . ems _ _.„.z __ __ o 0 0 g s ~ i s N ~ a w w „ ?'`~~~m =woe:gQ 3zF< s" nY^s";z g8°`fl''p sE' E o~oE" z m y z~z:o3 ucx~8o uo a: °i~4 3>o = w 3.=i o'.°.o: v 7uox -sNZ~ s r z o 4-24 ~= n~ ,- _ -n~ ~_ _~ .~° _ aim-,° _ - ~a - SV O U _ _w~~ y~~A v~4.N ~~~-_.. A~O °O c0 of ,°yQOJ ~~n-n - - -rv aY y n a ~ -''e - n- Y~ ne. -,gin--e aA$" ~ ° i~ _ _.~ .,. .n _~n ., _n r. _ mu Os ^u n _ -nri w- -a _ nN n -n ~~ ~ 2 ~ ^G o - o nOo nV8" _ - - ° m a o000 °oa0oo 0 C V e ~ _ i2 _ <!~ b - ~^~~ 'i0~ tab n~°- $g ° "Y 2 nu-^n - -~n nn _-~ -- _nn n - Jtli - - - O' y oO 8 O-J ~ 8iT- - °gvi ^$ g• -~m cgs ~e.~~ -.r^ __ _.+ - ~~~ ~ - o°'' aao - - H e ^ „o °~~ .. n +a.o n nn _nrv ~i ^ JU, O ~Vl~ Y- - - O - ^ a ^ ^ o q ooea ooa0oo a Z Z° _ O_ Q~~ 7 ,e _ _ _ ~' 0 - ~ - _ r o ~ ° ~ o 9'' s w a= ~ -off i C a E ~ ^oaFB w d~ H ¢ F ~ "' i~'=a°_ ''woE'g~8 `~.~cng~Ra^€z8~e`;~gi ~~dgnu8= m 6z°u°i5~g~asLL O°o3~~ow~c,.z34t3a o,..3cao o.Zuos tN2m' a o s z o - 4.25 a ~O ~ ~ "=: mn:n h ~ .. . - - N _ :_ _ _ _, ~ n m .. n i z $ o ce oo - 3 tea- ~ ~..~ - ~ 40 ~ ~n~e -n arv n . i~ e ' ~ ~ - o5r - Y " nrn n~„~r' n ~~, ~ ' - -, o«~ n .a ... N - n 0 _ _ __ Op S O U - ~ 7_ O CO[JO ODOOOO c0 . ~ m m _ T ev > vN~ ax i ~ - ~ ag o wg ~ -aR" m Ne am ~~on~~ ~, _ _ _ `" a e~~ Ba - w8°6S ~S~ o a s 8~ tee :d ~ ~ii tee- ., r -Nrv~ ti~ ..n C ~ ~. m -~ • ~ =a aa,r .~_~ - - _~ P~ n ~ s ~ ~ ' a 8, X°'_a _ '$r ~~'3 ~ :Rm '&~o~n o0 r N .r„ N La - Nn ~ rv .r N N ~ji ~= i e~~ g3'i~ :~~ p ~ ~N nge.Qi o0 2v i a8 P -+n m ~-~n p~ nD-a-i r ~v+nn rv- _h _ ~ ~ OVi V - . o ~ e o& nOOOOO o 000 0 O O ~ !i Y . ~ m a M1 S _ O ¢Np 6~ I - - T _ w° m~= rRo = P8' no'oiBaN °o u ig~ - gryn "° ~. i Nm~~~ a -++v ~.. N m -r _ _ _ .r 0 3 ~ - ~ e ~ U O g ~ ~ _ N ^ ~ rJ a E n n ¢¢ ') neq~ Z O oo ~ N S < i _mR p o e a w o c ¢~~ ^~ ° ` n~ ~3Z~ --c e F a~8}E 2 F~3 ~"' .~ =r a a~ w <4,3-i~~ 8s r<- 5u"~o y¢"~ ~ $~LL=€x i$~ 3cfa~o i 3 K d~oz°€: 3r~ _ ~a_ w ~ ~ ~ o. ~ N r- o 4-26 __ - ~`s. m3n~sa rn? _ yam ag a~„_ o~~~ °° oo, ~° aR~°O a° ry- ~ _-- °° ° _ a anal ~B ~4~ a°Nm r--°~~ - -r _ ~ -,° _° ZVi ~V~~ N- - _ a - ~°e ~o+ o Oed °o0o°eo °0°0°° O u Z~ - - 2 O <~ a 2 Ya~i~ r8 enr~m $~$~Se ~"_ _:~m °8~ 0 0 z Nenm r_ ~ ~ n- -.~ m -.n ° ~ _ _ a o 0 'a m i, ~ R _ ~ ; Y Nspk ` _ ~ a 6 w 3° 7 r' de,^dy `Fyy ~ 6g ~^ p?~e E6Y Payyy¢ 45 NFp 3g w t vY `a €a$E~Ehrc'_caE~`~~G~7iitla~9 g~pi °~~~E~62m m $f ~P:~S€ xS SSir~S~2'=~i3sr u`uoLL3-~e°5 ~~ s-f q n 3 x O ~n z F a-z~ i$', 0 ~'W 3' n ~° °0 v n_a 0 0., _ 0_00 000 0o a a O n - v '~ i~Ji Ti8 a- n- '~' ry~? f_ ~a_ nm rv~o -~ s v Dn 0 ~- 2n Tsx°-~ n'0m~~n o~i .vm ~ 0 U .3U Q Z O ~ - - 00° _ O - c 00 0000 0oc°0° 00 Z _Y3i an " " e ~ n n n V jC Q. 4 W 6 TY' i ° °° W Cgi nn vn nnagH' (- _ ~T Yn ~ ~v• N (~ Z 3 .. W J7' N 3' 2. nn O~n $~v mga 'TOn ~ eo a oF~ n. .,w „ n -- n _ rm -. w zVp~ o z 600 - ~ n a w m „o ~ zo .~ n~ n n __ __ ne _. _ U = " ~, °n - n< ,~ n __ _„ _ Na m ~~' _ °°~ ~ ° °° °~° o °°° ° a°~ :~-~ ~ ~, n ° ° ° ° n m = r ., o ~~~~ - <„ - ~o~'~, n~~o - a~s~p m~a °° ~, o C P 3 s 8 8 6~ .°~ 'v C F EC V C'wg ,u 9 O N hx rn ` °~=~ Nagg NEB °~'~a~a_°~ `°~°"^~ 0g`°gP <°~ i;a m ..~~„aEr~~83Fa_"~''_''~e':o:~ia'~0--`~'~ ef'E~u Ri~zsOa ui s..ao~uuowa~~z°3~quvo~3r=?o:S~2uoiaN20 o ~ z o 4-28 im oe _ nu= ':~~ ~~ o_m d. ..~ `" .ry ~ -~ r - na _. - .~ _ za°i 0 +ag' 'so n- - ~- nN ~ o:oo° o n ooe ¢o ' _ _ ~~ rv~a - Tom _ - ° c 9 ° ° _ _ ~n - 0 i6 - n. - - - vy9 ~o ~ .- C ° pg~ m. v- n "+ -- w nm -~~ a n a o~, O ' aU _ N o00 ° - o oe oaoo oe°aao °° N; ', - rv u a% oe'~ ~o ~ - _ Asa ~aH_ ° ~, ., n __ __ _ _ „m _. _ ~', X31 e. ..; "° ~ -- -" - - N -. ., m 0 Q V nx° - - q6O ~ N - _ O Tj - ~,~- as na.~ „-- ~° r~°°~e °° ~' i`~' o ' -- no oo° ° oo °o 000o eeoe oo oo~ m z~- ~, r m ~ a n e i ~N~' o iw ' i ~„ - 0 e s n u £ ° a ~ ' i - n _ ° ~-<a :g r 88 ~,~2 eSa"ag 8a~ 3 'O.°Pz" ;o_ "' gF'_`a:~ ew'o t"FyB o~FE~ z~;~a~~8ge~&~gr~apy3g~u3% m i#~z4uyuaxLLBo`5ciwow2wLLi33Y >0~.~~3o~o.7uoi~ci k"1~ o f z o 4-29 =m _ - -- _ _~~- ~m - r 2V O U " _ Gy ~ -.v c ~ ~ ~.. a~oco 'JO ra ~ nn sY c _ q X02 nY _ :i iy v . SOC ii _ e ~ ~~ _ npa n N{ay .v _ Zi nrv .-i __ .- _ un nb -~ n ~. p'n n mOn N _ __ oo __ 2m ~~ Om ~~ ~~ N n rv -~ na _v v n -, C_V., ~O$i. rv ry C O- 0 00 '~OOJ o_ppOa ~a ~Z a_ ~ ^ n ~ rv a ~N~ L ~a~ mn e$ $r -n8a _u?i~ nR_ ~ J. j~l n~ ~A rv ~~ ~n ~ nn _~ • .~ 9 O Io oV~ e^lu m8 x. "in ~m~~ _ a0 O4m °~ O Wg~, ~~Ag° ~8R-,~ S_ $°8"- ~~', ~_ N o0 o n iio~ n wo . ~I z. off', e. .., H H- -Y - ¢m -. . n n z~` o °p' -n r o00 ~ ~ _a ~ ~~ oRo~ooo ~a~ooo ~n - o w~~ _ i w o og~ S&~~ eAmrn~ _ - _ _wn o z o. .n r ~ -' __ ~n -. ~$ - n of p 'o e p g ~ U x y ~; N Y w yip=-E~9w=~oFN'~9~E'~'F y; ;i'o `o;d B~Fw s~Y=t„-3 s' _ -' i£u~~~y u`a LLcug~~~o..a=.izi}usu~3: so".Sr%uo$~.sa~~ - u 3 z o _ 4-70 N~ C ~_ ry CSI ^+,T.N Ica ry ' ~Y '~ ii ~inv _ nei rva n _n °j 2Ui U TN 3 vn'~a' ~.. ~. "Y _ ~ ~v~ 'moo ° y <O~ _ v ^ ° O r4i rv - rv~e~i p 2'y '~- v-~ n n __ rv ~ arv n~ .v. n n Jb n 7 w- ^N ~~ _ m?iy ~.. _ OmO n'~ ^~ H n rv_ _n _ nP Y~ N. .~7 ~_ [~ i a rN' R „ ac0 ^ O ~ ° 00 0000 DOOOCC ~ _ i - N u pHO YK Jj Aa an a ry ;a ry _ m~ n~+ nt N ~n a n O O ~~ z~''i o f o.° <o r~ ~, tea' - _- _ °m~a _~: °_ ~~, Yo4 ~~< - s~gr °° ~n °- - - pgi ,. .., H ~ Y- -n _ _ Om -. _N a a.3! o ~u~i - Y o00 0 _ o oe o°oo oooo°o 0 T V ~ ~ ~ o m 2 - _ iy a O 6'n p i _ 2 ao m_ _ _ n~ _ NRr o o $ _ ° c' "-~ `c e ~ o _' n $ Ee 9_> ~ s e4 3Qu n °~''o ~"u_; .w _ ${ v,2;_a'~a~s8a o` 9~ ; sag _~ w"te °" `woLL OEH =Ei3=~`=y ?6i$°°~`aePw2Fg3gwy ~3' m aiU~3 u°j~j ux°aoQ~[~i o`wsr:i33a~~ p 3:~a.-ox~u°os ]'"'~~ Q l 3 Z O N a 4-31 m 6 ts~ ,n-nom _ _-, - .,a nr ~ _~ 0 0 ~a r. v -- n Y a „ ¢q is i n 7 C' r 8N za ~. _ a __ __ 7 U _ O _ a o o n 0 - o .~Vy [~ o v y p ~ ^ 0 0 o_ov oooec oo - ~m vi> - rv ~ YKNC i , ~ $ e.-ham w -_ _a - ~ nn r -~ ' ~' ~8_ $m 2~ ~ge on ~ e. - Ei .~, ..~~ n ~ w- n ~ - ~m rr ~ -n m 4v, o ~°E Ya,~g° ~. '~ ~ _ SR poem $'am oo vo r H y ~ .~ ~ . n _.. . w _° r . z y "_ _~ H ~ -- - r te n -~ r ~n ' am -'s ~ - -_ F is ~.. y : - ga ~.~-a- H .h .~~ .. - nr n~ n -~ c~ z 0 ~ - _ o00 ~ 0 00 - ooee oo oooa o_ - " £ ~ _ H n n ~ _z ~ i _ _ N a z ¢N _ - :8: Boa oe _ _ _ _ _ ~ u° C z c a 3 ip<n " = `~ E-- ° w ~P 3" ' ' W ~ z e v1 F a F -~o: o c :F B v~ uB y1V2]Ua Ui2ii0i VU0.., K~=uz23 VGO +;~SO~OY YUO3u3aQ~ C Z } T. O N 4-J2 y° - ° z~' _ 0 4pe n > P e ° g ~ mgn ~ ' v~ s Y v .-_ _ n_ M1n N _n ? i r is ' .^og ~~m "y~ aSa m ~ °° ~ ~r_.,: ° °_ __° - .n ° ~ s3 _ _ rr a . ~ o ' ~z;'~ ~ ~ e°° m ° gRoa °° ry °o°o eooee° °° _ aN° 0 "°~~~ e:~ ^rv - ry.° r« ogees ° _ r ~ n. . .. _ ~6j YI rv e v ;~ i _n >ii n s31 z - 0 u~~ g u ° °ee o ° no$r en 000 °e°°o 0 =£ N 1 = ' u w Y°8. n~~:8 .. _ -mRBn ° RY gmR~~ ° i o ry I e 8 q - _ - A i a c 3 ,R F ? ~ 9 °~~ ; F A E fg 3 w x .° e ~$ cep ~'°. ` ~ „ ~ '=v, Ew° 8g ° ~~ i 3 &a 8;g aP ° e~ .F 9 7; ~ o'LS a _ sM 2Y ] < v E ' E ? F v =s~ss3 _ o sa~~dsg Ges~ o z ~€~~ssga>~ g8 vo~ sego e~ ~ u 3ssg ~ z~ a . N 4-33 o ~~ s, nr~~. ~ ~_ _ - ~ _ ~n .. _e 2U __ O V r0~'i a ~ N nn oo -o *+ ~ t an u~ a 6 y _ n rv ~ ° ' ~ Y o S ~ - ^ 01S Re e :~_ 9 _ R e ' . n . -_ °rv .h Nr n . - a ++ ^(, ' 2 O U- ~ o~° a - ° 00 oe~ Y i' ~ n '$- °o og - . ~ °° a _ a~,-s "= Wig, . n n- -_n - _ ~,~ n . OVi ^ U _ ~~~~ u~ • _ __ ' n n r 0 w Jji n pp °~ an-n rv • rv- __~ _ nn r -s ou°°., - o o~S _ _,~ -~ aoc ~oo a oo a°oo ooooeo a °v22~ ~ ry i Z ~i`n~ ~ O g n _ _ Of O 2 ~ i nu~ n eV~~ ,y - n~ ~~ nh _ _ w ~ni ~ -. _ o' - ' o s B r ~ z 3 ~ y = n _v S C g EC ~p iE "-~S s ~ ~ a ~ yv 3 i i ° ` F }"E ~ o ~~ w ~ 8~ x a; S ~ m ; ~~ 3 .: F z w ~ ° i F ~ a c ~ P ~ ~ ~°F9 m i~ a~ Uai€a'-os s u"u°ow a U. O.i3i~i+ao g3~ ° s °9o.oY g, ,w d~s~ saa~ ~ ~ z = o ~ _ 4-34 =3 SS3mmm. °. ~.~ :Rmm8o ,^~~ eR:°mmE AR°^.°ry. $. ° o za°O 0 >s °~~ « N m rm N 3;, n$a ~ea;s~ aa:°a~ sae °g 'a ~~ mm dog gNC~~ _~ ~ omm P m r_ o mo o~oooo0 000000 o z ni ~ o x= iR S Yo°~~ "g"~ mr ~~R CmRn88~' C.$ m °$~'m n~~.'"r :, ° u io , ,,_m. n __ _~ .. N .m ar m ... ° bi o i ~ ~ -ga E~3 F a€ N~ g~,~, y~<3 ga3 5 9 i~js€ }§~ y 5°aq aka§a ~f~~4y5E 3a S3i8~C535 $~pgi€~EE ~g~`-i~i a mJ ~~~x]3~~ai.ao uuSw2raz;syu6oa 3i-SCrbw1 SxLLSd2m' Q V S 2 O N a '- 4'55 m 2. - 70 Oq - n.v Ju Vann ..m - Ei'~ ti._"'_ - _ _o ~ i8, 0 i€~ eT n man °' ~ n ~ ' ~6 c oo_o _~ooe m- m ~o~ - ~~~I 3a, _~_„_ _ _ _ _ „ _ n ; z6 -~, e$ mm .mnh _ __ _ ~~ co CU O, ,yU _ 000 ao -~ ~'JCaO 0oc000 00 ~~ nr- ~ v ~On .~ QN~ yQ 0n aW -m~N :~~ nm p0 2 V M rv n n ±i n Oaq-9 YV rv 0rv ' mm tm~n N mr~ •g 0 Zpi O U _ w~~ vim ~ O O0 n~0 tv n~ vin Y OooO b o00 O y a ;dpi QO i ~a c' is ~m m$~. mn .m.m - n.. o0 o~'i z 0 u~ - _ o0o mo+ oa n,~ o000 oomnao 0 u ¢x a ia _m~„_ _ _ _ _ ,~ _ .. i 0 s ~ = e a > u B 8 b; ~~ p a ~ _ ~V~ < C F Epp ~.i ~aFS w ~ 3 ~ ev_ a„E ,a cNn ° 8L ~~°°~~EiS my o a } mfE ;ems ~` ...s~ °5 `w°o Eepw#F&F E4m`=.a;§i;°g g3o~p=g~~9vaQO> az~iug u'a z~,a o5~uo ~ .i3iy~i u~..?:i~~o Tuoi,.aaT~ U a i O N 4-36 =~I 0 -~9, - _~ _ - e,~,o 00 , ~o og :8a n- ~n _~-r - - oe i-0. ~~., e~ :R r-~ m - o 0o n._r_ _ _ ~ _ ~„ _ r ~u i, n o ' .u - o00 oe ~ m°g~ ~a - - ~ ~ ~ h~ o0o voe~oo 0 sryo~ Wx Tw° '"mm ter, ~~ ~_ _ _ _ _ _ ~m o~ m off! n.~~_ - - - - - 0 ^92~~ mg~„ ~ c °O ~_ ,^_~ ° ~r oeoa N o00 o a °O '^ ig i ~~.° zc - nr ~80 .m~°n ~&= mm 03', o ' ,.o~~ ~go - eoa eo oooe eoe aV'0 rv n .'1 ~~ Cao C N m1 Z i'~^ L ~ ~ ~ > KU p 2 ' oar Sand"_ ~a .m -n_~ ~ +I ~n N n N O O N y ~ ~ ` w`a e~.6 - ag N'Ago`~o3gao °s~ ;a,g~ }=m ° w ~ Tb a3;yawo~"'E%n ef:~~F`E es 9~z88:~e°!"'kot9ES~3Y W m '' az°u°zsu]uaxLLioSuuowd~~.iix}ciso 3: s'mCo:7uoi:.iN2~ F u ~ z o i 4-37 Zi - ~o Ox n n_ nn m~ vann _ f -- °m _ .v _~ n O cOg ~, n ~ ny nnn- ~ a- __ __ 00 0° ~ QO ~f n Iq - n±~ sti Bann - nm _ °° ° ~nQni v~.~rv _ _ .~n n , 2V O mU.~~ nm 000 n ry ' °O nr f 0000 0°'Ja oe e m2o Q /1~' TOS ~~~- nrv •u Ym_y nm ~ 00 2 ~ rv ~ _ rv ~ _ _ .. _ _ rr - v Jy - O ZV ~iI Ir~_v.-. n _ _ un ~mn f - Rn nu tV n O roE~, $~ _8NR"8 ~$° ~R~S°- °_ __ °8C °° o ee a° ,r ° Yo °y ~', =mn-_ "' - _'" -n_r $n nn m_ Y °o sd o ' noE ~i _ ~ o00 _ o° °°°o oee°°o 0 msoi ~m N n ° ^" - m Q^.^. O of j v' o R _ _ - v ~ - u -'' rQ, „ ~ E o w 8 r c~'~o ~~n f 95 S oQEa3 a6 9c° a '€F ;$3 -' w ~~=~: `u'.o~'E,"n '8 ig<~~~z°9oA`z8'E~SsE iQEe "gau89' z m .°(iUZi u°SV>xuiOQUVO`w «~:221y~JSOLL;r=3 ~=o:$uoi -Zya3 F - o ~ z o _ 4-38 U m CC ~ z OGgll rpm it ~.~ nm m. ~in mT ne~ _ °~rv nn n ca O n ¢ 4 ° ¢ytp ' ~~ C ~~nn M1~mm _n m~mm nin ±$ _ nm n-°~ ° ~~ ~ o z m~en° °_mooo rv~° Nonoom ~n ao°omom oem°mo oo:^ UPI ~ $N: ~~~ Nm - _ °_z rv h~~ <_ ~; - ol ~~~ _^ - :'ass""~~ 5~ .i~~ao tae°~a~ ~a=_ry m u 1 ~ ~ r ° N° „„ m °o o _ mNf' Sao, _ n is i j =a Z~ mn •rv~e mn ~~nn~$ `~~~ n~n orygo _ ° nU° ~_ 000 oa o00o eeeooo 0 °tlt nm n n n ~~ _ _ eS!• ~ 1 YW 9II °aO a_ = o o m° Z W<NC II ' O x3~ nazaR -^"an^s"". :a° racaaa ;fie°3~a °~s°~_ 8 '~ w ,; 0 0 o 0 I f ~ ~ ~2a2a pGe9 EFy eF4GG~~C5`N%aY q*~*N S~$°~~;~~J ~y 5 ~ Q ~g 1~1 ;ai 2 W R~UYl~]~~ZUd~]UV9W ~f ~~~~~O ~O~;~~~~F ~~Oµ~p<~ F U ~ Y 2 O N 6 439 o. ~._~_ .~ ~ .. ., ~a~, - _ ,a _ oe - OV -' <~ w^ SS -- _ eg .n __ ~~ n _ ~PNet- - d m °: °_ - Q~' vr.~n- rv n . i n ~v IUi O ~ oo - a~ ' $U; p ~c rN p i __ C OC ..~ °Up ' Nm Y N n - N aNC YX ' ~n° a o ~v, 0 U s ~ r° n - r oG _ . Wo ~~~ - 'r e° ~ - '- .gym .- - °° ~ ° - - _ ~a a p g nv-rv~ rv rv - ~ ~n ~ n _ C C (~ i 2 ppO op OJO° uooo0° O a2~ na - - n nN ,y i - ry p __ HO - K 7_ z ° H°-w rv - - ~~ - h ~m 0 0 _ e ~ ~ ° ° ; ~ N ~ W _ ". sa' ~ ~ g g~ d'" ~_ =3=>~; y ~ ~ `fig ;'_ ~ ` ' w ~~_?P^ h o ~F~ o " ~< < __:,. _ go~g E i;E="_%~ w ',° m g€~=s~. f w ~a~„as s ,~es a~_.<;-'; z~ o~;e:o.s .a~a~ws;a~3 .: ,~ S u i z o N _ 4-40 ~ i°j w$m 'n ~" ran en :$° e o`ff' u _ "'w2i ~$° Nr„_ .. en° .".r h R"o R' ~° 4 00 o s ?,pzi n ~rv - H~ a °i rg 0 0° ' '~ is ~$a .~ _ "~. ~3A,"~'or .$°na o i o$i x uti en°_ o°o "oR°°° ~ °~°°°ee °eo°°o ° 8x g, «° >W°~' ~og.lry .~ 3 s «a_ma~ qs axa°~Qe =~~°ex ;~ o, "_~ ea~o$ .~es~ "" sv~a?~. oa "s,Ra°~gs °~a°~R =°I~ O • t`I ~ CI - N n ~ Ci N ~ m '~ OZ'i ' ~ Q~ U ao°oj ^_ x _ _ _ „ °a ~z1 ms~a.~ :~~$~- ." s;~a°a. o."S :R.3°RSS °~tnPi°:~ '.S °~~ _ r r ti °°°°° °,; 8o sm _ c °°o N n' °° ~ °a°°°°° ° ° r ~, aG~i iw ° i oa'I na~RS ~&°S~ry &°° «s~~°n. &g =na°R 8$ °~.R°"n. ~'R ~ ' n.+~n~ w ~~i n °' a ~ ' z 1 e o ' of 3 e E (~€ (8(jws a~° $E a a •a ~ 3~ L; d W c ~ °~ w o a oux. o ~uoW ~z;a d o~.3L o w F a 2 O N d TI =e ~ - - ~° _ ryNO vn.-v •.Y S - 00 - _ n ~o 9- 8' ° ~A - - n ~ C n- ~~ °n e.. - z ~ .. ~, .+. _ ,. .~ on' 0 - ° - o° zm •n rv °r r~nn °w p~~i .vn-n- n - rv n - n O Oi _ O .og~ °o° °o _ °o°~ o°coo° °~ =a - ..a _ v rn n ~ a e $z, Y z :~.-°- :~ :~ - n -~ rv on c =~~ h -~- r _ _ n OUi U °o - r °o o° .¢ ~~ °«r- - ~° .~..Y R ~r ° u ~ m n ' ' ~ _ _ n ,Y - v - u o' v ° _° iq ~.~. .N .~ nan° $r na ~n ~ cu°', z 0 °a F~ '_ _ _ °o° o° ~ o~°a°o° °oe°e° °_ or w ~ -, Hi i ^ o am9 c i ' ;fir °&m =e °~ .,~ ~, ~.,___ nT - e 5 T n _ B3 ' ~ '- oA ' E '-~~ ? 3 s y a = . . ~ a z o n ~ 3 ~ m~g m ~ a F t 8F 3 E;s& ~ o a a ~ W w N 9 h any 5 <a> _ m 6 9a '=€i u a 3: i°S 'o u 'i x a~ a ~ i . -_ ~ o. . ~ , ~ o o a ., a-az -g .n-n- n w -^ ~ . "ac ZV" O $~n nNN ~^n- ru sntrv n - nn ~~~ 00 70 ~ Sa~ v.~~v N n w~ i ~6 s a'aBe- _ _ ~q~°Ra ~ ~o ~n Y OyC '' ZO y, 1' nn_n .. .tV N N i..m v`~i~Nn _ Y _mRana - ~ a . Su° ~VU OS _ 000 N ^ ' 00 $n N oooa a000oo a0 i 2 ~+ 0 rNa, _ Tsa _ ~ o 0 0 0 3~ x _ a i o . 3 _ 3~ a s~ s ~ #~# ~ ~~ oy~ €~u'af .gH g~~c -~° 7=z 8554gg¢~~`~3€nw~' '~ m z~u5ozz¢io5~u°ow'a cLL Z°3Zao6i ~3~>E~~8.z.7~oz~. aN2v s a s o l > o ¢ 43 SCS ENGINEERS - SECTION 5 CONCLUSIONS SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL STUDY The following conclusions ate based on data obtained during the course of the solid waste disposal study: • The percentage of the residential waste stream which is composed of paper products in the Cities of Chino and Montclair and the unincorporated area of the County is higher than the average figure for similar jurisdictions studied by SCS. This torte is lower than average vt the Cities of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga. This may be due, in part, to the existence of a pilot curbside newspaper collection program in the City of Upland, where the percentage of newspaper in the residential waste stream is less than half of that found in any of the other jurisdictions. By comparison, the percentage of newspaper in the residential waste stream in the unincorporated area of the County is greater than I4 percent. • The percentage of plasflcs in the residential waste streams of these jurisdictions is generally higher than avenge, with the exception of the unincorporated area of the County. It should be noted that there is a very high percentage of plastic film in the residential waste, comprised primarily of plastic supermarket bags. This item should be considered as a potential target for source reduction. ~~. 5-I SCS ENGINEERS - • The percentage of glass N the residential waste stream falls within the normal range for similazjurisdictions. The exception is the City of Upland where the percentage of glass is considerably lower than in the other jurisdictions. again probably due to the existence of a curbside collection program which is diverting a considerable amount of glass from disposal. There are still large quantities of California Redemption Value glass in the residential waste streams of Chino and Rancho Cucamonga. • With the exception of the City of Chino, various types of metals ate present in the residential waste streams of each of these jurisdictions in greater quantities than are typically found in similar jurisdictions. • Residential yard waste is present in large quantities in each jurisdiction, with the exception of the City of Mootchdr when: the percentage of yard waste is exceptionally low. • Over one-third of the commercial waste stream of the Cities of Montclair and Rancho Cucamonga is composed of paper. This amount is expected due to the relatively higher percentage of commercial interests in these cities than in the other jurisdictions. fn the City of Montclair, for example, the Montclair Plaza is generating relatively large quantities of paper, primarily cortugated containers, none of which is being diverted at the present time. • Over 20 percent of the commercial waste stream of the Cities of Montclair and Chino is composed of plastics of various types. The exact nature of these materials is not lrnown, but might be investigated through a mote detailed survey of commercial generators. • Metals of various types, wood products, and textiles are present in the commer- cial waste streams of each of these jurisdictions in quantities typical of similar jurisdictions. 5-2 SCS ENGINEERS - The indus[riallconsWCtion waste streams of each of the jurisdictions investigated are dominated by the presence of wood and concrete. This indicates a considerable amount of consWCtion activity in each of these jurisdictions, and programs designed to divert this type of constne[ion waste should be implemented. • In spite of the suburban nature of several of these jurisdictions, and the existence of a considerable dairy industry, we were unable to document the disposal of manure. This may indicate that considerable quantities of this material are currently being diverted from landfills, although we were unable to document anv large-scale diversion programs. Table 5-1 lists those materials in the waste streams of each jurisdiction which are generated in sufficient quantities to merit inclusion in a recycling program. SOLI6 WASTE DIVERSION STUDY The following conclusions are based on data obtained during the course of the sohd waste diversion study: • There is cutrenUy a high rate of diversion of the industrial waste stream. The Cities of China and Rancho Cucamonga are currently diverting over 50 percent and 25 percent of their industrial waste streams, respectively. • The percentage of commercial waste (relative to the total amount) is very similar for the Cities of Chino, Upland, and Rancho Cucamonga; i[ is much larger in the City of Montclair. This is obviously due to the presence of Montclair Plaza. During the course of this study, SCS teamed that there is presently no diversion program in effect at this complex. Montclair Plaza should be carefully explored as a candidate for potential diversion, and will most Wcely play a critical role in meeting the diversion mandates of AB 939. In each of the jurisdictions studied, i.~. 5-3 TCTFNGINEERT- very little diversion of the commercial waste s'ueam could be idemified or quantified. Each of the jurisdictions will need to review and consider a full range of recy- cling, composting, and source reduction programs. A successful diversion Program will rely primarily on the residential and commercial sectors. SOLID WASTE DIVERSION AND DISPOSAL DATA Historically, the waste magement industry and other businesses anc rganuations in California, including those N San Bernardino, have not maintained pr.-ise records of the types and quantities of waste generated or how it has been disposed or recycled. To fully document the diversion goals mandated by AB 939, the participating jurisdictions will need to develop a more thorough tecordkeeping system and require that large generators, waste haulers, and recyclers maintain and report accurate waste generation, disposal, and diversion data. The following steps will be taken by each of the jurisdictions: • Establish an overall recordkeeping system to track all waste generated, disposed, or diverted in the jurisdiction on a montlily basis. • Collect detailed records of the quantities and types of wazte handled by municipal crews such az parks and recreation, public works, and street maintenance. • Cotler_t detailed records of the quantities and types of waste handled by refuse haulers operating in the jurisdictions. • Collect detailed records of the quantities and types of waste handled by recyclers, secondary materials brokers, composters, and targeted businesses in thejurisdic- tions. 5~4 SCS ENGINEENS - • Collec[ detailed Etxords of the quantities and types of waste handled by disposal site opetatots including self-haul loads and salvage activities. The data should be specific to each jurisdiction. _~: , 5-5 ,c SCS fNGINFERa - TANLE 5-I. 54JMMAYY OF CfER15 M WASTE 5l8EAM5 WITH Hit7H Dit'ERStON PO'ffB1rY117At. Jurisdiction Resiflenlid Waste CommeErid Waste Ind~trid Waste Stream Stream Stream l: nincorporattd Newsprint Yard Wane Wood County Cardboard Tiru/Rubber Coo<rcro Yard Wute Concrete Ferrous Metals Rancho Cucamonga Newsprint Cardboard Plastics Mixed Paper Mixed Paper Wocd Yazd Waste Tires/Rubber Concrete Chino Newsprint Plastics Plutics Mixed Paper Wood Wood Yard Wute Concrete Concrete [ipland Mixed Paper Newsprint Plastics Yard Wute Green Waste Tires/Rubber wOCd wOnd COnCRIe Montclair Newapriot Cardboard Cardboard Plaetica Plastic Film Wood 5-6 SGS ENGINEERS - APPENDIX A DEFINTI'IONS OF WASTE TYPES ~L ~~ AFPENDIIC A DEFINTIgONS OF WASTE TYPES ENGINEENS - PAPER CATEGORY 1. Corrugated containers: Paperboarl containers fabricated from two layers of kraft linerboard sandwiched around a corugating medium. Kraft paper was also included vt this category. 2. Newspaper. Post-consumer newsprint which may include supplemental inserts of various paper gmdes, and which is typically recycled as raw material m the manufacture of new paper products. 3. High-glade papers: Various grades of office paper consisting of white and colored ledger paper, computer printout, and bond papers. 4. Mixed paper: A mixture of various grades of waste paper, unsegregated by specific types such as corrugated containers, newspaper or high-grade papers. Mixed paper included chipboard, magazines, paper Packaging, Junk mail, etc. 5. Contaminated paper: Various grades of waste paper which had been contaminated with food waste or had a high moisture content. PLASTICS CATEGORY 1. PET containers: Polyethylene tetephthahtte beverage containers. Commonly used for carbonated soft drinks and bottled water. 2. Plastic containers: food, beverage, and produM containers, including pigmented high-density polyethylene (IIDPE) and other plastic subgroups. 3. HDPE containers: High-0ensity polyethylene containers. Commonly used as milk containers and for bottled water. 4. Plastic film: Household plastic bags (trash, sandwich bags, plastic wrap) and other phtstlc film. 5. Polystyrene containers: Food, beverage, and other product containers and packaging material made of expanded polystyrene. 6. Other pL~stics: All other phtstics not fisted above, including pigmented HDPE, PVC (some food containers and plumbing parts), polypropylene (pill bottles and threaded caps), thermal-set plastics, and other plastic prroducts. z: GLASS CATEGORY SC$ ENGINFFAS - 1. California redemption value containers: Beverage containers with label indicating California redemption value. 2. Glass containers: All food, beverage and product containers other than redemption containers. 3. Other glass: Glass products that are not containers, such as ceramics, plate glass, mirrors, light bulbs, and other glass products. JIETALS CATEGORY I. Aluminum cans: Redemption and non-redemption all-aluminum cans. 2. Tin cans: Containers fur food, beverage. or products which may include tin. 3. Ferrous metals: Steel products or scrap with magnetic prttperties. 4. Nonferrous metals: Miscellaneous nonmagnetic metals, including aluminum foil, scrap aluminum, brass, copper, and other metals. 5. White goods: Large appliances, such as dishwashers, stoves, refrigerators, hot water heaters, washeES, and dryers. 6. Mixed metals: Metal products which contain another material type such as wood or plastic. YARD WASTE CATEGORY 1. Glass/leaves: Grass clippings, leaves and other organic waste resulting from gardening and lartdscaping activities. 2. Fhunings: Tree limbs, branches, shrubs, and other bulky items resulting from gardening and Lwdscaping activites. NON-PAPER ORGAMCS CATEGORY 1. Food waste: Animal, fruit, or vegetable wastes resulting from the stoEage, prcpamtion, cooking or handling of food. 2. Woud waste: Wood pieces or particles which are generated from the manufacturing or production of wood products, harvesting, processing or storage of raw wood materials, or construction and demolition activities. 3. Tires and rubber products: Tires from automobiles, tracks and bicycles; other _~. SCS ENGINEERS - mbber products such as belts, hoses, robing, mats, aril end use products. 4. Manure: Animal excrement suitable as fertilizer or compost material. 5. Disposable diapers: All diapers that are intended for one-time only use. 6. Textiles: Any textile item, including contaminated mgs, clothing, and remnants from manufacturing operations. 7. Other organics: Miscellaneous organic solid waste. Materials commonly sorted into this category include dirt, sawdust, and items such as shoes. OTHER WASTES CATEGORY 1. Asphalt: A tarlilte substance used in paving applications. 2. Concrete: A 6azd building material made of cement, sand, grovel, and water. 3. Inert solids: Inert waste consisting of sand, ruck, soil, fines, brick, and similar materials. 4. Household hazardous waste: Those wastes resulting from products purohased by the general public for household use, which may pose a substantial known or potential hazard to human healN or the environment. Examples of household hazardous waste are paint products, cleaners, pesticides, hefiicides, batteries, gasoline, motor and diesel oil, seahmts, and simihu• products with toxic pnrperties. 5. Miscellaneous: A mixture of organic and inorganic materials less than 2 inches in diameter that carrot be easily sorted out for characterization. 6. Fines: Organic wail inorganic materials Tess than 1/2 inch vt diameter. SPECIAL, WASTES 1. Asbestos: A fibrous noncombustible mineral used for insulation and generated as waste from remodeling and demolition activitles. 2. i3ulky items: Disrartled furniture and mattrusses. i~ SCS ENGINEERS - APPENDIX B FIELD DATA SCi ENGiNEFgi - CNLNCORPORATED AREAS OF WEST SA,N BERNARDINO COUNTY K8 ~~ ~ 8~8°R 88°.888 °88 88888 R8 '-08888~C8 888888 88 8 R ~ R 8 8 TR ~~ ~ 49888 888884 988 8 8888 88 4888588 888888 88 _ - rv Qo ooc_orv _ o o.oooo 0o eooomoo aodono 00 5 R 8 R 8 8 N N _ ° m N m _ ~'~ ~ 8~:°98 R8°988 ~8~ 888888 88 ry888~~8 888858 88 -" _ w ~ i° - ° - - _woaoo N o00 ooooNO o w R R 8 ~' 8 q N J `c_'~ 8,1 ~ R°RR8 888888 8-~'-8 88'S 88S 88 85i8885i8 858888 8S ~- o0 0 0 0 0 0o nooo~o omo 00 N r n ~... ~ n ~ vl Y '~ 8 R o R 8 8 R o ~ n - N 4 N ~ - = Pia ~~ ~ 49858 885588 888 888885 48 R8885tAS 888588 38 ' - mo a oonN o00 ooNOOn mo rvoooryNO a oooa o.. 2 ", _ ~ _ - z R 9 9 8 ;R ALL, ~ ~888~C S8°8"~ "R8 °^8888 A8 ~AS88;088 888888 08 n °° °°no-., ~~ m° e m Nom _ m m°°°~° ° 8 8 ~ 8 R 8 8 _ 8 a ~ ~ 3 a ~ a a 3 ~' U Z ~ 7 ~ ~ 44 ~ _LL ~' ~5A ~, - ¢ a ' a ;:9 ~Y A ~`k zci3f3gc~azEGJ ., _~z~LLZbrv`o.~83~~dF. ofiF u.E2av %j ~a' ~ g~~a3~a? ~a c'~ c- z" a 0 0 3 `z i 3 2 5 3 0 z ~S 'd A888A 8S8~V8 8°8 8.°8888 88 888888 888888 88 rvSo oooa,~o ego orvoooo ao _ 00000 oooor.o oc 8 8 R o 8 8 ^ c',8 d ~ SR8S38 88?°R° °eg 8853888 8~ ~RS?88S8S 8888SSt 88 .: .- _ o _ ~rv „00 oo~noo ~ 0oorvao aooa o0 A 8 8 g 8 5; 8 , m rv ~ ry0 ~ a a 9 R 2 _ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~_ ~ ,~ ZU ~~ 3 ~w ma ~~~ r~,, ,y -'sj ec~ a~rn~ £a~ g3 o$g }~'~' ^F ..F z ~a ~u i~gua~i~a~~a.~.i^t E~~°~O~un~°3c`i6 RFQ~c4~.~~f ~dv ~ Q"q nd ty ^~oN~c oooNOry aoa _NOO7o To ~ooaona 000000 00 ~ ~ o n e ~~ 0 0 +~ cOOOOO aQO Noo ooomo Z' bd ~ - O pOOO o ONOOOp 00 ooono 006000 p0 8 N ~O ~d ~ '-'~'<14 O Np pO O Ov0000 OHO ^OOONmO O000a0 ..O Icy ^ ^ _ xO C~^ vOx m0 Op ti N b ~ y o S m O Q nm.~-O 000'100 000 OON000 00 OOOONO Oq D,O NO 00 O fZ1~ xd g q-t~n0 000000 OOO OOV1000 00 01'+000010 O_N 000 00~g tlV l ^ 1y _ q O 4 r x p v. ~ - _ O d N~ONO OOO nnO 000 4001- Np0 OOOb00 00000 OU 0 . mg ~d ,~ O __ON COO op-00 0000u1m0 OOpONO 00 '~ LL O N^OY10 _ ^ _ J N _ - z _ 0 'a o n r N o {i .. r o w Z s~ and Q -coom oon moo - oN mo ~oaoonmo op amo 00 0 z a .cope oo _~roN -xp oaooo,u N bOOOm_e vooo_o op 8 o N _ v i ~ N m g - o b ~, N ° a m ~ ~ a a a s a r°- .- .- ~ ~ ~. ~ S i 3 n n U _~ JJ ~ ~ a ~ qy 3 .1 G F ~e C 0 y ¢ ~ °' !/1 ~'- ~ 111 3 and a s X85 m_ `= ~~ rg a~~ w d 5 ~ 'z9'y a o g- ; ~ m wg o ~~. E., 3mE~s m°a ~ ~ ;_a~8 }off ~^-~ $~ 9 wwC~gd~~9 be 8~~~'f d; ~'~~=°v,~a;~4%F ~~ w'E ~ A~E= ~ z ° u~i°~~ci3il~gt~u$LLa55UCS'b~atiu~3l~~d ~1~3 F`~61=~~d(g~g ~~yam p 3 aE i~ ~ 3y o 5 r O o ~ r= Q 6 O y~ R 2 Y 0 0 a 9 3 W 1 O z eg 3d QS i~ Nm Op0 Oop oOp Op 000 0000000000 pO 00oio pOO OONNO piOO ONO O O CCOpOO p OOC~O 00 8 O ~ ~ ~ • O O _ ~ OOb '~OVO ~T- ONVr10p ON NFOOPOO OpOO~N O '+N ONO OOf~~~- X00 OOP~00 O~ ~Vp000 O _ o pooo-o ap S - R g e ~ p a -m -s 3 a a a a R .`^ w t U g __ 4 ~ ~ _ R 3 ~ y U O _ _ ~ B L N ~~ w 8x ~ ~W °~'~°~:~ r, ~'~ nE~s," _o3~sa o~_~ 3`~¢:glF ~p"> gE g~ = ~$~3iE3"g c4n$~8b~~~Ub~dti_~'sF~c~n",~83ti36~~~dt4~~'gZw a"s j C:- r Z ~n z ao .,g 9 S88i~~0 888?S8 RSS 888880 S8 8800888 Sm88A8 ao S S S 8 8 8 8 m ^ o c o m o i~ ~~^ R SSS~RS 88888; 888 888858 88 85388888 888888 88- ai-. ^ ooYO c noon c~0 o a o 0o Qooooo ^ ooma o u ° S 8 8 R R 8 Yl N J n O N m O ~~ ~~ R 8888 ~~ 88 R1C .-.-^,R ~58 ARS888 8.8 53 8853.88. SR888~ 88 8 a^ '^ ^ noooo ao^nN- ^oo YNOOOO o Qoonoo o~oo - 00 R 9 S i4 8 as ^g $ R88~a8 0888853 800 880000 88 88.88080 a8~88Oe 88 ,' 8 53 8 8 8 8 8 p o a o ~ ~ o o n v " `mB mg R 88888 888888 888 888888 88 858888$ 888888 88 8 ~ - ~ 00000 ooooa o0 00 0o ao d~oooo 000000 0o v u E S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 E o 0 0 0 o R o 0 N ~ m5i d qq RRSi88 8853~Si8 888 5388888 SS 88885388 8538888 88 ~ RLL m, nrvA~~ oN`o^o oao ^ooooa No nooo^oo 0000»n o_ U - 0 2 R 8 8 R 8 8 $ 8 6 u{ e N .. N io ra ° 5 ~ a a_ a a a a _ .°- r r° i 3 o ~ `~ y 4 a ~ ~ - ° ~g °- 3 a ~ ~ E yy~ y yi „ '~ $'m 3 ~ o~~ Sy `u c' F ~~ ag °d ~ Y 3 e£8q 3c 9 gg £ 8a yg ag$ ggb ~Z of ~8 ~ aWa~~~iS53a$Ea°b5~°]~d~~~3~~ua~8T~f6°8o2B6g~~~s~ z e„ ~m ~ 8°x851 ~51~:5351 888 851~R888 ~8 98885;88 888858 88 ° eo 000 dooado a~oon° o0 a= '^ rv ~rv - ~rv .. r m r a `0 8 8 8 8 8 LLc,° ~n1 85385353 88~R8K8 8~8 888888 08 95388.8518 85388~A8 88 8 ~ a^ o mn°S,'R oororvo mono n~oooro a~o°ro ^ n ~ 8 '~ 8 8 53 8 8 9 _ 8 ~ ° ~ im ^g S 88888 888888 888 888888 88 8888888 888888 88 8 a °' °o°°° °°°~°° °°° oa°°a o° °a°°°°° °°°°ee °° o U ~ 8 8 0 8 8 S 8 8 ° ~ g a a a a a a a 4 y `-~ ~ _ ~ 3 8~ ~ ~¢a"~,ma ~Fn w =., d c~~~~c3 3a a a~°~~y Qi m~E ~~' +` ~~ ~°Wd;o`~„ g~~°~ v~ cF2~ ``sb~~3~$8 ab~285£sza am ~u Y~u° asLLUb3'~u ~3ti~°i uu`~ 43HSd~ gg ~ g%u x' olE-' ~v ~? ~ ~a a 'J yE > i o ~ Qa eg ~ oPmmm mm o ~°o ooo~~e mo °oSoo m 0400°0 0 N O;o~~ _ o 00 o~oa oo g N ~ O O O H O Q~~ ^~ S 00000 00000 o0c 0 Nooo 00 oNOOO00 ooocmo 00 0ooao 0 000 _ooc o0 oMOOOOa Oooo-o ~ a^ r N N o ~ o a 4 ~ _ ~ _ r 'a NOON OOPmNm 00 00 00 000400 NOO.-.- ?O a^ j~ b ~NOO~'1 00'1 ~C~0 TOO u~o000 00 bNO0i000 O~OOON C O O H 4 r O ~ Q O e~ rg c m o0-armo 00 ooo00c o0 00000 om o-0-o 00 cP $ n0 o.no ocooom 000 coooo 0o Mgoooo0 oNOOda 00 8 0 0 o m m o 0 0 ~ o D LL Z'8 mg ~ 00000 00'0000 000 000000 °o°e ooSooao o'oo a'aa oo ~' ~ m _ _ ~ ^ 0 0 0 o c g o 0 TO-~N OeN 900 N00000 0000000 ONOOOV o0 Q~ m'R ~d ~ nbrNM OV1Tv0 000 000000 bOOOm00 OOOO+N 00 U 2p_ O O 6 n ~ O T ~- ~ O Q m a m ~ ~ a ~ r= r°- - .- i- .°- r= ~ F s 3 o ~ a r C U ~ ~ n ~ 3 o m~ o; c 5 ~ `A, ~ N y~ v~ a° 8- ; ~ ~ m ~^~ t ~'_ .,,ES ~5eaga°d gY~ 3s~2 io_ S ~ NQ gCIaA~A W '/I .'t .'. u~~Ym; 6 qy ¢ ~ ~r ~ ww3 r ut E~~~n c~~E 4~ 9~~8$e~k0 W ~g ~W R= u ~~ ~ ~~£3~'3c5g3a~"~~YnbSuu~ud'~~°g~7~i~a~~°31'-~C~~~~t4b~giadm 000 - -oomoo onoor9 00 0 ryN NG~ ~ P.~N USN -N-a N~/1 O O ^'~'O OOm ^ O'G Oam00 ON0000 00 Q O N ei O ~ .- ON- ~ ry rv O ~ Qo Rd c 0hoo~ Oeooao 000 crvNO~o 00 ~-~~oorvo omoorvo 00 N Pee wmn9 mo 00 Z o `2 n O P a ~ r ~ .. ~~~ 1~~ ~ O DOO P00000 OC0 p00000 O 090000 00000 00 0000 000000 a0oop 80 OOOa00o oGOOOo H.^ h QQQV o o P P a ~ o g 9 y m a x a a a a ~ . ~_ ._ ~ r= ~ r F 3 c ~ L ~ U i a = Z ¢ n_ Q r~ Q LL ~B~ A ~ f ~-'` ~j~N if ¢ ~ml q QNS 3aF gk ~ ~¢~°,~qm~u `a w ~;.i ;:' $=aa3`4'S¢ a~`R.c ¢~f'~A ~ .j ~ v,. `o `~ 4E'-`n ~X` -c'9o "d5 ae° aogw i'g ~"," ~? ~ z ~ ~n~iBP€u4u°a ILLiTJ aJ' _-~_'i;€yc~a`OLL3L~3.-bC ~~b~ €aa~ C z '~E ~~ as S '9 Z O n ~ o t- .- ~ 3 i~ Sg 8 8,88$ 888x88 888 888888 518 8888853 888888 88 im m o 000v ' 000 000000 No 0~a0000 000000 00 ^ n rv ° ° 51 8 8 e$ 8g ~ 08888 888588 8SS 888888 S8 8888888 885888 8S rv C 0000 000000 000 000000 0~ orvooooc 000000 00 } a o s o s 5; s s ~ 8Q a 58888 58888 ~8~ 888888 88 8~SS8~8 888888 88 oommm omom ~. eoN ooao rv oo rv o rv oo~mmo 00 8 R 8 ° 8 8 o rv ~ m o 0 _ ~, 8 888 8R8N55 888 888888 88 8888888 88888 88 a. mg '~ orvooo ooom0o 000 0 00 00 0000000 000 oo ~ S 8 8 8 S a rv m o 0 o e o a 0 ~ "^ ~g ~ 8~8~8 888A8S 888 888888 88 8 88888 8518888 SS 3m rvo 000 a 000 000000 00 .. 0000 omo 00 l f OI N -~ O ry 0 ~ ~ 42 ~, sa ~ 8 a a ~ a o rv _ 0 ~ o $ rv ? 'S 8g 9 8.'4'888 88 SAC°'~ 888 8885158 88 851888~R8 8888518 88 " 3N N o^ooo ~i O1aa „ 000 00 0 00 0 000x0 eooewe oo o „ ? ?C 8 8 R o $ 51 8 ° ~ ' _ rv z ~ a a a x a a d r V ~ ~ ~ r y ~ n ~ ~ s O - 2 ~~ N S 2 J `~ i 4 .. ~ m ` n n ~ ~ ~ w d ~ v°i s ~$ ~ ~W~~~m~~aF$Eo~%:~'s~~~3'sm~~2 g8a~~~gg¢fr~g~g%v 8~ ~ z ~~ ~ ~~}3E~333arLLabSci-_'•Sw.3'~-`"LL~.bKU'a~~°.3cI6`-b~~3~£~.fNam ~~ .' ~ Z : 6 ~ 5 r O ~_ Sm ."og 8 88888 858888 80O o88S58 03 888 $SS 88$888 00 8 - o o~oomo 0 oooma oN o v 8 o S 8 8 8 8 8 9 0 e~1 8g S 85888 858888 888 888888 88 85288888 888888 88 r Cm ooooc oaomoo cco oc^ooo ao a~6aooc oooaoo 00 N n n 8 8 S 8 8 8 S. S rv m ° $ ~8 8g ~ 88888 8oa8o? ooo 858088 88 8808880 ~o88~R8 00 8 8 8 8 8 o ~ m o m m 8 e e~ 8g R 88888 8885288 888 88888q 88 8$88888 8A888$ 88 ~ 00000 000 00 000 00000 00 m00000 Og0000 OC a ° ,~ a 0 8 Si 8 !C o 53 52 8. o ^+ 5 m m d 'x e~ 8g ~ a8So8 885888 888 o8S888 88 8$gS8$8 5888.88 88 8 ~ a ~ o ~~m m odgooo a~ ry 3 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a Z Q5; ^gg 80080 888oa8 888 888885 88 888~8888N8~8888 08 ° a= o Imo ooo 0 V i S 8 $ 8 8 $ 8 o 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 w ° a ~ a a a a a ~ . r ~ ~ ~ ~ r s o ° "t N U i I m = ~ - `~ w a ~ 3 ° y g s ` _ ? F ~ n y w 3 ~ m ~ ~ a ° g $ 3 $d o 4mF i tp cicS .S~ ~g ~ ~~~„ 3-o~F $ °a ~'v~YA w ~n'~'- ~ 8zm 3dG8ay ys ~a g ~- ~ ~~ ~ ww3 m N r$E~Yn ~~_cm5 Pg^~~C b~°$xa ppwgYpp ~~U~~ 2 ~ m ~ ~ °~~u°x~c~s~a xLLi65tiu a3....'.g3ba~a ~.3ti~6~b~d35~w~aas Z E ~~ g ~a a c7 s y ~ O n - ~ iC ~F ~R mg ~ 88888 888808 083 088888 88 8888888 888888 8S 8 ' oooao oaoo 0 0., 00000 00 oo oaooo ogoooo 00 3 3 R R S 8 $ cl $ < o o a o 0 0 ~ o `a w 0 O ~ eR ~g ~ 88888 888888 888 88888$ 88 R888.SSi8 888888 SS LL P- ~ ,oN mo rv ooonm ooa 000000 0o rv o 6~,0 Oodcma oo p a_ c] -' R S S 8 8 8 !0 0 - - ? ~9 8g ~ 848°R 88~RR8 888 8°888 88 Si8888R8 888888 8S - z ~- orvn oon..nw ooc orvoo nooomo ooocrvo 00 z R 8 ^ 8 8 8 8 5 ~ n o ~ o m ~. x _ _ 3 n a ~ a a a F _ _ 3 _ _ r r ~ ~ ~ r r t F N I = z ? ' ? ~ y ~ J - 1 N - W z~ ~S v d 3 0 a s "d ~ -`~ ~ J z~P v ~-", E 3$ ins ~ ~m~ `2 ~s a„= 'i `~~ 3 ~~ °4" c~~~ w ~ r, c~3 ~ a=.~ 3.v 3~ca oe ~ s ~i mgR x' ~ ~~-' A Fwiom9 ~ wo E" _~~E_ g~'~ $ u~~R wfrF o~%v8e m$~c~i3tg gc~a i~u5a,i8bya'~~".$a6au`a~LL 31=IC~b~~~b~¢ENam' `p = a°c ~~ ~ =a a ~ N Z o d~ ~=~ ^~~'~ ~Q ~ Ov0oO 0 cNVO 00O Oc..000 mo maoOOO oooocO 00 N h p o 0 00 0O0 0 00 0 -0popa 000000 00 _ m o e.~ g~ a00o 0 000OOO 000 OoooOO n o~~+pOO00 000000 00 0 ~0Y o00O 000000 000 00p000 O6coo otl6ooo 00 8 ~a 0 0 0 0 a o r o 0 0 Pu~ m(] a oO000 OpoO0O ' oO~NOOn 000 O~ OO ONO o000OO Oo O 'S 00000 0000 ~ Oo O OQO ~'O 000000 '~ ~~ m o m ~ 0 0 0 0 _ n o e d O -" =E ~ o'ooa popr,op o p mo pe OpO00p0 a ppp o 3~ 000 00 0000 od odbb '6p O~ood60 00 ~.8 0 F y nl O O O O O Q O ~ J~ W pp mp0 O 000 0000 00 r+0O000 OO,OOrO 00 .a aOr ~6 ~ 0n00 OoOV1O0 000 000000 00 O~OOp00 ONOONO 00 J O yK 9 O O n N ~ 0 O j ~ N N 'JZ z -s ag ~ Cmpp00 - .a oop ppo 0o Op OOhmppm0, a°ompp ° j an N o mN _oH oo oooeod 00 0000 0 00 g o ~ ' e e p d N ~ O H m 6 ¢ Z "q "2 A_ ~! 'A A ~ 'A n _ v ti F F r 4 ~~ 5! ~v_ ~ yy 3 0 0 ,Q o 3 ., .¢~ ~ at ~n v~ w ~ and °' W _3~ = ~ _ ~ 8-'w£ '~ ~ d ~ ~s 4 _ C N 8g 3 ~ n~,mo~v~ w z c~ ~ ~`mi~m°Q6 a~m~ ¢m`gR '~3~' !? it A wwy% ~y~C`v~`o GiS€3"^~ ~~E ~c-„$y528 m,~.PF~fw g %u 1 i m .°+ yid ZC3i3fJ~Uni~.n btu";~5w3L~.iii¢c~n.p~°31'-idr-b~~351~g~o~~m V z E `3 2 ~ a i r9 Y >- Z ~ o'c ~ 000000 0000 00 00000 000000 00 ~ zfl ~g $ 000~~ ~~~ _0 0geoooo a o o 0 8 0 0 0000° amoo 000 X000 00 onoooao 0000 0o S @~ ~~ ~ °0000 oooNOO ooa °00000 00 0 00000 0ooao0 00 0 0 o r o 0 -_ °00000 00 oa o g TQ 8A 0000 ooao 000 0 0 00 0000000 n 0 00 0 0 y 0 0 0 0 n 000000 000000 onaoao 00 ~ Pm sg R 0000 °°amoo X00 0°000 00 000000 ~oooo 0 < a o 0 0 ~ o~~0 0% 0000000 0~000o as ~ °0000 000,0° Nm mE oooa~ 0~~ooe 000 oooooe 0000000 0°800° a~ g ~ f 0 0 0 o o g a 0000 0000° 000 00000 00 0000000 0000 0c ~ ° °0000° as 0 00ood a'g0 oo0 00 z eR ^g °~ 00000 000000 000 h _ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ° ° u s a s a m ~ ~ x a a ~ S a M N N a ~ U 2 q _ ZS n ~ ' . ¢ 9 ~ h ~ ., _ U a ~ O G d ~ ~i I`n Sd `_0. ~' _~ k ' = v v ~ ~ ~ ; Sew p ¢ y ~n c3 3? ~ ~ 8g ;L N °5'~a ~52c ry i,-o~,j~ ~n ~5~c~~o35`gd ~aO 'tl„`~pq.~¢4w~9 QC ¢~4 ~p ~u~= ~ (J ZF o FW 30Qi ~N ~~~OJt OFF~C.. ~ Z O~S^ V~4 VOZ ~~6~m `f ~ Nk `~uzsu gi~a x~.a 5uu., ~E ..". z°;~~~ao~.;~36r a o ~~ ~ ;a V 5 > Z c~ rr mo mg a 00000 °OO°0o 000 000000 00 ooao a a_ _ oao~o~ o0o Oooa~o 00 0000 00 o8oooa ve. _ s o - ° ~ o 0 0 0 ~ S o 0 44 ° om 000 00 LL rv~ mg 3 a~0wo m0oo0 aoo 000000 00 000000 o Dory ' rv oa oooao~o o0o0e0 00 ~ ~ ~ ° n o o ° °v .o 0 J Y~ 00 000 O00 ~O Pm00000 Opg 0000 O U O~iO O O Z a ~ rv O N '+ a M o a5 x a ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a a 3 ~ ~ .- .- ~ x 2 N y a m - .-: ~ $ - m 3 z8 0 ~w~~a2 ~v~~i~ E?'oN(t <<~E~~m~~3~~° ~^~ 3aoFF ;~t i "E ;g -' `n°d ~u3~cg 4cgn ~~:a°d~~utio~a~~: ~3Ea+D`n r~83 F`Z6~~oac4~~~~~8= ~ u'I= ~ ~ 3n S'' r Z xm N O C8C CLCN~~`VGA C~ OF RPM ENG~NEEaS 'A '°~ ° 88898 8888 RRS 8Y8888 88 53888888 888888 88 31~ ~ QOn~N ~~NmNm ab° DbOVDI- ^ OOOm viO 0°O N9 00 53 8 8 ~ R 9 53 0 eR .:~~ 988!'8 9538885 988 8°8858 8$ 888852518 88888 88 8 DaD boom D..o o°o -oD ~n oooonD oD -.-~,..~v rv~__ v_ n nrv- 8 8 R A 9 8 ~ ~ ~ - ~ ,. D m m~ '48889 °R8~~9 888 RR8~85i q8 988R8H18 858888 88 .gym ~+ '~' bDOnN nova - mD bmoD N v _ 00-6o O o n o., _ 8 8 4 4 &' 8 e ~ S e 8 ° eR '+d 8 B~:RAB 888888 888 888888 538 X888888 885889 8-'. 8 c`:n LL rv an N orv o 'mo rvmDnDD m 6ooooD DOODmN co A 8 8 53 9 q 9 8 'S 'd A88~".8 8N88o8 ~R8 ~8~8$ ~!C i68.88~R~$ $8888° - m'm ', m _ ooo- ~. _aD oNDOOO ~~ maaDa~° oooo-N o_ - 8 9 8 8 R 8 _ n ~ n o Ba S 888 8 RA8,88 888 888888 ~$ ~$88F48 8$88fCA 88 r° c moryN mn m occ omDODO rya onDO~e ooo rv °D 8 8 ~ 8 o a a ~ x a a a a ii c ij N z _ ~ ~ ~ p 3 u O c c ~ 4 ry o ~~ ~ ~¢ag~"o€~a r-o>~'3 v„~dso~3 ~i sa ~~58s"4 a~4°E4 ?jS `:~: x Zr- A 3~ Q w ru °dW5e5 n "~ E EEg 8.-`i B fi :y y y ~%v - x ;~' o F~ ! aa~i~xf c~~cgatuaO~UU8~3ti"°.~$S ~cfa'~::3tiY at-OOQ IQOiufi~a 3 ~~ i 3 eQ '°~ ~ Ro888 ~RR88R 888 8RR88R 88 RR8888e 888888 88 iu _ _N o0 om ve o~avo~ ~m N R A 8 8 8 S 0 0 0 m QR 8d ~ R88~C8 8888810 888 8R888ta 88 ~88R8~8 888888 88 rv ~NONO oaoo N aoa oNaoo~ No NcoHC oOCONO oo v q 8 ~ 8 8 R 8 S N 0 P v~ e N O '°~ ~ 8R8RS 888°88 888 888888 88 8888888 888888 88 N f' OOOn00 000 000000 OO 0000000 000000 00 F R 8 8 8 8 8 8 R '°~ ~ %3888 BH ~Si8~ 8~8 B~~SS8 8S $8.8888 8888"8 88'8 ~~' N n.-o onnNV~ n r oo N~oornoo oooo NN o0 R 8 8 !0 8 $ °' N ° _8 and is X888 888~8R SRS S~A888 8~ 888888 888888 88 bm v_ o0 0 ~-^ n Nya aNNOOO o~ ooaoono oooomn oo Y R p 8 q ~" R 8 'D n v ~ n n fl 0 'Xl and ~n~t08 S~~t6R8 A88 888888 A8 ~88~88~ 888888 88 %im $ w or Nmno moo oooaoa n nooradrv 000000 oa a 8 q R 8 Sl 'A 8 8 a n m ~ ° n ~ o 0 0 0 s a a a r a a a z B_ ~ ~ •~ N S2 0 G o g ~ ? ; = v ; i o ' ~ E b F ? g ~ 3 °g ti 3 q ~r 3 A ~ n9' a ww~ °~ S~9 cn r ~~ E'-'`n~i a g i ~ 3Sgrn ' ~E_u~ ggJ Z ` o~° ~a ~ yy 8 o~X'igg ~6~~v ~ _ ~ ..g= 2 ~ ~~t~~E <i~c~ wubai~~.. _3.-.. z35 ~5a ~ E LL3F36r=8Qaub~ c 2s ;~ c'E .F ~ ; SR 8 8 8a og Y.B 2.8'oS°~° ° S S`a,AgS° ~$ nm ~ w $gg o°~ g p t~oR ~ 'Sa~O ROO ^° o N ^ NRRo Ra 00O °o SRaR ~ 00 g ~ pRRR OR p ~~ r aORR ~~ ! O Q'.N n a S"o0°O O ti RQ $ ~ J NR -d .(~'T N N O ° ~ e ~R°'NN N ~ r ,n R`A3~ oo ~ r r 9~~ o n°• y o ~, ~ N a rm ~~ S 9 ,~' ~ r R ~ 3 w a N 9 'S Na o 2 1 r ~6 E Y C$ ;'mss '.~ ~ s 3 ~ b~~ggg4ys w" w ge so£w~3 3 n ~~' b 3 3}p( ~~ Z~~ v'~ a V T~ o N ~ J, CG S.O ~b At~6' ~ p w U`A `uA W ErSg~ ~ z. Z o~ L4' ~ ~~~m~NOd~t°ib ~ U 8 a ~ ~ ~g~~3S i U ~ ~ e ~ n O v~ ~ ; `2, ~ v r O +, an ~~m< o~o~~-, ~~v ~oaoemo e~ d ~ e .~ o~.o_ ~o - oo~oom ~o ~ m m ~ ~, _ o n v NOmOOhm O S~ ~ '~ Nl~m m-.a-ao _. ~),JC OOJ000 P OOOOVm,- 0000 0 00 O O XXII m O O m ~~ fiS ~ Fj - OOm ~O~hmm rln0 ~mOmOm - mClOOfi r:O 0000 00 y~ v - - N m r _ o -~ am q -m o - mooonoo o ~m rv-rvo-- om o -^o omo oo mo ~ooomoo oooomm o ~ n ~ m onm o 0 moooano am ~ a-oo rv oao 00000 ma oaoaao o_ ~ -m ° yy~ X q oN OO mm mocmmm o m --ono o0 cow o cooo a o~oooo mo rvoaommm n~o6nmo ooao o oooovm oc = z ~ NN ~ - O m N 1~ 7 Q N O ~ N N C m O C~ ~` a_ a ~ ~ a a a a _ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ a M K Z i ~ G ~ 8 ~ g ~ a - ; v o ~ ~ w ~ w ° - d p 8 3 ~ ~ ° ' ~ ;o3 ca 'c s ` ¢m ~ ~~ 8 G- c ~ 'o ~ 'L sico > ` ~'- -- c c ci y = vs $o ~ ' >% ' i ,^ wwv v'" moCioE i ° g f ° 'b ' '~ F - o xyq ~ a H 3 a ] ° ~ ggg d LL3c 5 ~.:5- w~og ~ ~g ~' a ' ~ E ~ ~_ gun x~ ~zc i c a 4 s n . ~..z ., ZaU 4 > ~ ~ f ~.. i a0 : ' O o'~ - F r ~ 3 n`~ od ~ +^ Nvrv N +oo °v0 00000 -ooNo Jm - • _„ - v ovm-oo eeoddoo omoaoo 00 ~ e _ o o m 0 ~'R m"J+ ~ L~o09o 00000 O°~ - o aooooo.o auoomo 00 Y_ ,~^ o o^oo - wo -no- No oocooa o ^ ~ m o N~ n some ooonoo 000 ooaoco ~0 0000000 aooooo 00 qq rv " ° ° ~ 0 0 0 -N and ffi mo 00 0 ^0 oeo0m00 0ooomm o0 ~~ - - ----m nm _-^o 00 - o ooood o y ., o '? - o - and o s^ oomv mao ~o 0 aoo om oomeoo ov aoooo..o oooo~n as ,,, R _ 000 0 -vo- :~^o o.-m o0 0- 00000-o 0000-_ oo g 000 NO OPT 000000 as m ~ m- - Om _+l0 -00 000000 N NOOm00f+ 00 Q ¢ C p Q N ry - N 0 O O u a a a a a a a ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ r ~ `z ~ 0 T N N a U_ O _ j c x' ~ 9; RR ~ w U ° ~ 3 O 3 yr rn P `~ rw- ^d u ~ cam ` n c [~ .J ~t~p W yl u- 1= Vi S: ' v E~- 3 Sd ~ FN~ L 9g = ~-~'c~E~Xf rn°d yy 3 m~~ ~ q ~~ 8 Nw ~, 9'c °u ASEa w S,N wv B~'~c~~m_mp3 a,u ab. sqf¢ S ~-e Z o~ ~~ ; Na ~cg ~cgatgagLL a°OgUUb,T d~~°.~3~aga083FE0 °O~dfSO~glaam'" 3 ~- ~-. ~ > 22 O v e8 nd moo ooa o0000o nm OOOO o00 nm~mm oa ~ moo aoeoao mo ~?~oo6oa oo6oom ao g N `a 0 d 3 w U P~'~ mlW O u 00 OP 000000 00000 ~~OhN 000 00 .~..0 Ory0000 ov0 h00000 000000 00 !d N P N Y O O a_ a .- a a a ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ a 0 " '= n > ~ 2 2 .: ~ ¢ 3 $ ~ y ~ y ~w m cd ,~ w ~ -" " v U aw ~ tt ~ ~2 24 y6 'F 3 N E a" 3 ~g ; ~ °4'q ~Yz ~ ~' 4°yc ~ ,"~ _c~9}~a g c' ~ $ s ° - $ ~33pp 6 ~ ' 0 - Z/ B q ~t ~a2 F43=m. _g Dray E;~~ind £~E ua SU.a C~u~ c9a fuxfci 2t`=LL~33 zp$$ LL 3 rr xx~ yy44 F" ebX'~OFSQS~ iuf ti36f= w ~"_ ~ aS p =E ~~ = a ~a y g Z O N ~~_ ~~ i r v $$ m S$Sag3! °° ..~ $$$g$ r ° $ $g$ ~ ag g ~~$ j'-°N° N $$ v '-°'~oom°o °~ 'PS OS og°o o° $ .,9 2~ m R m$ o$ ° .~ 8 ~ ~ °go v°° A m $$o g, ~o .n 8 ~ $$o ^g~` 1 A $ oo $ ° ~~~~ m °u o 4 ~ $ 'g oomg $, ° $ m 8 0 ~~ N°' NN~ ~ ~ 8 s$ $g88 °O $° °. ~t n ~ ~~0~ ~ r° !d $ry~ 8g Pn ~ m "$ti `~~ ~ N $° 0°~~ ~~~~ N m O.+ ~ '~fo SN$$ O ° VO fiQ m P aka oO Nm ° O f~ $ P Nm O~ m N r ANN OS~ mO m o'. $$$a ' 9 $ oop °°$ NN $$9 ~ N ¢ t:. o$ Nm'~ N N V $$$ O ~p a~~'~8 pm 8 ~ $ °O $$$$O° $ ~~ Rd ~ O O $S ~O°° ~ C< ° 3+ °a! ~ $$°°°~ g$S °° $ ~ $a$$g'J go $ °o $$ o°° $3'$0° c~ o $N$o°OO $ o °~ $$ m° o N$ Td ~, ~ $$o$g8 °° A ~Ni O ~ $'3j$ O° N ',d 9j O O ° $ 9 r r~ $ ° $ $ ~ Y Op o O~ O '•dJ Y o n ~' JI r v P O LL m ~! m ~ ~ ~ r a r 3 w a ~ e~~~~LL=d~<r m+~ ~ 4" 38~~~ 3 n i d3 y`23 ~°'BS `~br o ~' 8 a g i N~ a~yaay 2 y~y 5 ~ CP-O,9~rNGwO6~J ~ ~~ ~ °~tm gy. $g ~ ~~~gi~3g 7~ Z i J ~d t 7j iJ ~ E Y~ z N OV °~ ...., „8 0~ m o'4 'f.'8'R o8RR8^ 888 8$888R 88 5i „488888 SR88$8 88 am ..~o. Y ,. °°° °°°° s, C° NNOOOC° POGNO °C Y 8 ~^ 8 R $ 8 rv _ A 8 n m o Nm m~ ~ 8R888 888888 8:8 88R88$ 88 5388$A88 888888 88 - - rv ~°oo°° ono ° moon ° Nooom°N °°°ovo °° 8 g R ^ a ~ m 8 8 nR ,~c1 $ A5i88.8 88~~~R X3,8 $8888 RS A8888~$ 888851 t3 88 R ? oNO oom.. o orvooo0 No ooono 0000 00 8 8 8 53 ~ rv rv rv r n - $ ?A 8'd ~ SRR~B $88 88 888 $$8888 88 8885888 m888888 88 8 o o~rvao °oo _ ~, n~~° ° °o0 000 0 0°°0000 000000 0° fj ~ 8 8 $ $ a $ a8 ^m R~K'R8 885 S,R8 ~A8 8R8St SS8 88 5i888~~8 88888 88 8 n8 oonono rv on0m~o 0o moooaNO o~voamo 00 .~ 8 ,n, R o 8 h n _ 8 N ~ 8 -R Rm 8 R8pR8 ~RN~8$ ~$8 R5tg888 88N8888SS8 888S8q 88 ~+~ o; _moho mnnrvno 0o NrvoooO o0 om a - 00000 o°oom8 0o Y N q 8 g "n ~ ~ 8 ~ t0 m ° ~ a a ~ ~ ~ a ~ o _ ~ 9 t~ I ~ V Z ~ C 2 p ~~ m ~ ~ w U ~ ' 3p( ~ # in ~ ~ ~W v 8- ~ ~ g8~ sN~ v a ~ ~8 ~~ w d 5 ~ ~s ~ ~ m ~-°, 9'i ~ a ?' ££ d m"3 sa 336m~yy 3 a~g 3a 3~ mE ~~ ° ~°ws fc3 i'~353a$~ab5u%i 'Jw d.~"`3~~~2~86m57E wi~gA ~r 3 oL ~` ;u a .~ ~ u23 ac~nOU34'f 6:~p~Bbggfaa~ j i- 4~ ~ 885,8$ 888888 888 88880$ 8$ 8.5388808 8888'8 So X N - 000 p p 000 o y 8 5 8 8 S 51 5 8 O N - P° R~ ~ 88558 88888 888 888889 88 885888 85?8858 88 8 vci ~ .. rvc Doom o00 00000` o ooododa o~oowo 00 R N 8 ft 8 ~ 8 8 Q? ~d ~ 538838 88888 588 889888 88 5888.858. 851888 a^ 88 N N Nm vo 00 _ n -oo - Coco 00 .-oooaao N oeo 0o y 5 5 5 8 8 9 S N _ e e ~ o x"- d ~ 88858 888888 R 88 8888851 88 8888888 888888 8S a- rv oo - oo mco Noo oaooo~. oo 0000 000000 oa Y 5 8 5 5 8 8 8 8 8 - ~ Nn ed $ 87.18 SS? 888888 588 8088$8 88 8$8.8$.08 8m88m~ 80 _ - 000 ~O pO pO o ry Oo ' iC O ~ O O 9 /1 O O n O C ^ ~ O QS 8d ~ 8885~ 85858 888 858088 58 8588888 885888 88 N worm owa~-o aco a o0 0~0000o aooamo o _ s ~' .C 8 5 5 S ~ o n m o n ^' ~ 'a a S a a a a a k-, ~ ~ ~ r - ~ O O - J N Z (J _ U~ ~ > d q 3 Z~ L J tU o n 3 O 3 6 W ~t '~ ~ `~ 3 ~p °9'to~~d w t Nt2'? Nc~~oc~ ;~sc6 of s` a7p~S ~?_ ~~ A ww .~ ~ ~$e~~y vet ~ ;§'$805 Q~xe 8 gr_3~ ~ %n°4~cg3 ~~~~nxLL a°57u'Ubw3~~°.z°3~~~a`~~..3~ICS~SF`dt~Si~:.E~.i: - i c~ F~d % ;a u r > o - i 8goeg 888888 888 888888 88 8m88888 888888 08 z^ S~ ~{ oo~ro 0o a N o 0 0000 0 8 8 R o a" ~ 8 go 0 0 8 o m '888 8 o0AR88 oSo 0 0888 $8N 8888$88 8m88°S o~ T= ~~ Fi. o _ p S _ ~ 8 g 8 o m ' gg 888So88 8808, ~,~~ o'_ :R yd g m;^:88Ki QO 888e0N °og ~~ggoo 00 m :, ry0 -~ 8 8 _ _ 4 8 g m k f moogoNBd 808080 80 m'A 8d ~, ^888'grv~M1Og Si88 r-~o Sooo 8$ 8 0 ., ~m ~ 8 8 g 8 M 8 `~ N - X88 8888888 888 g0S8 08 ~,~ nd 9 ''~oS ry8m 9+898808 888 0'0"'4'000 0o N 0000 00 0 o Nm ~ry_ 9 8 - ~ g 9 N 9 8 r 8 m N88808'8 888888 0~ ~ :P and 58888M1 80880 888 8Q08S8 88 omooooo 0 oooo_ o 8 a ~, n~ 8 8 8 $ m 0 8 0 ~ a o q ~ - a - F " a ~ -~ k ~ `~ y ~ 3 ~~ u ~ ~ ¢ B ~y$ N ~'# ~ _ T o. pBA - n:yx, n"'~~ 8 m5 ~6~~3b .`-. ~'i ... _. 5, 8~ ~ 'd ` 9~~a w ~;nd3_x E'~= i~j~~i.oLL3~4br 0 ~ ., c~ ~ `^?3°'-, q,$ `^ow2LLiTOj ~''~~'-i¢oy~[ y z z~ "' z3~s35ud , z ~ d ~ 3~ '~ o~ ~: a 0 eR 8LL R 88888 588888 888 888888 88 8888888 88.8888 88 8 S" a odooo 000000 000 ooaoo 00 0000000 008000 0~ a 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 a a ~ a a a ~ ~ .- .. 8 S ~ o a a r°- 4 m w ~g ° ~ `~ ~ E 6 m ; w ~~ ~ a p~dl ~ ~ ~~ E 8 ~E w aq ~ ~ cy ~ 8- t wo N w r vc`N@"5 d~ `2g m~ kE 3:~a¢=~gP 3g_ v ~~ux$[3 gc~nxLLa~ vvFwa'~~~;~~c~n ~.3FI6r~~dt~b~W~a as".n' oaF FF ~ ;u u ~ f r ~ o ~n 38 e~ MOi^mm mooo:. -no v o 0o mp maoooow oooon o0 0 u1m0p OON- ~O M0-00 Nut 00000 O 00•`Ib 00 j M m O y W :J r N O Aa 'P"~ o$, v0y>m voo~na -~-o --oooo 'ao ~ooooo0 oooomm 00 ~ _ ~ - a a o p N N nl m n Y O Rm Q, n0-- nOON Om 900f100 ADO NOOONUIO 0000 000 a1"~m' LM (Cm000 -O_pN0 ONO OOOt~00 X00 i'1N00.-NO 0000-.- O T N ~O P N O 9P°1M PO'DtiNO 'D Np ('iO:VOOr~ NO 000mpP OOJnN OO 0 a^ ~m p m"1 OOON_m M-ul Y-M1OON N0 - NNO 000(]NN 00 g N °1 O N O n Y N h O -~ n~ o~ 0000' OooaOm moo 000000 ao 0 00000 a_ eoo ooo6om ooo 000000 06 c~oo0oo oooo~0 00 ~ a o v e 0 0 o m - o ~~ o~ omm o oo~ooN ooo 000000 0o moo00o o a0n o0 am LL orb-oo ooNnoO ao0 000000 ao o-,ooaoo oooo-v on ~ o p o 0 0 o m m o m m o a 0 d ~ a a a ~ a a a a M (/j N ?d 3 ` ~ 8 ~ ?g m W ~ a ° o ~ 0 6 w m~ a d ~~'~ ~ ~., 8a~~ w ~m~ a_ ~3 C ~¢ c~< ~ w pP993~= `?fie o3 Ea a F¢a $ ~ - aE S_'~ '~ a$~t4i~g~c~ra'~x~°°.b Ui~U'S~~r`~:i32~~a`~°3FYd~bpdci~g~luam' ~ ~~ ~~ g o^ne~ ooxnoo 000 ooaaom oo moaoooo o~oamo 0O ~ 6 O ~ 0 0 o m m o C'~ m~ ~ 0mooo aooooo arvo o Nooo 00 ~oooNom ooooo~ oo ~ L P O N O - O qO CW 4 ND ~OmO JOVN~D m~0 0 0000 P moo0000 000000 00 W IV 000 Ho 4~ A~ m~ g O NO 000000 000 000000 OO 0000000 000000 00 NCO 000100 OOOOO 00 0000000 000000 g N n a O O O O O O m~ m~ I piN NNV OONONO ut O O~nON00 O m0004 O 0040P0 0O O m v1m o0 ~O 00 00 010000 ~m - N v N - O I~ ~ O -p ~W [~ v10'~-00 00 000000 OO Om00000 OOOON 00 O ~v'1 YLLI f'N -1r1 -NO NOO -0000 00 0000000 OO~ONN 00 to Q ^ O N Q O m of Y O m - O O ~l a F_ 9 R_ 8 a_ F_ F ~ M U ~j N U ~ j > ~ ~ w c~9y a S r ~x m 5m °' r~7 ~ p" i En ~ ~awq w d ~ y a 88 3 -~io~51S w t °c_-~c~5 ~ ELF w$ aQ6 ~a g~cay eys FR ~3= ~ fit= ~ w~ inE EtggN~ ~E ~~BS y pg"~8~~~~~~~g~wa"m' ~ ~$~t3 ~~~~3c?a $.: d85uuo~.+a:.LL Z°3Z~~a~LL3~7 otE ~ y ~ ~6 a ~ S r o °Of ~ oDro~ oco mooooo a0omo @q °d o.-.Nmrv ooo-o0 000 00000 0o mooooo ooooo~ oo Q N ~j - O O m ~' O O O O O .T~ OLL ~ 0j n O0 ON 000 00 00/1 X0000000 mOO OO nO O00 ,jq ~DN - N 000 a00N 00 Y00 O ovl 00 O N O O N ~ O i O ~ ~ O OOrarO uf00 t~r~ 00 O vi pO 00000 ONOOaO 00 am ~~ g N vo oo-ate.- ooo ooy0oo 00 0 ooO~o ooo co ~ 0 ° m o N o N m o N- „~ q oono oo0eoa _ o oa0o r oo aNOOOOn 000000 0_ - Ki ooomo 00 0o co 0000 00 0 00000 006000 00 ~ a^ „ N _ O N O Pry V~ O O~m O 0000 m00 OOJ OO OOO 00 N00000 NOOSN O a_ ~mr° ooo0mmo mo m moo 0o eomdmo ONOO-o R a= _ - o m ~~ ;d ~ Do ~ o°oDnN amp ~e0oo~ 0~ 0000 00 omo ~~ ONOn vonoN 00 00000 ooOoN ao K Q O D O D m O .J N ~ 11 N O O d ~ a a _a ~ -e a m a ~° r° ~ - r= r° ~. w ~ a' J ~ N N ~ ~ __ ~ _ c' ; m ~ g 0 6 w Q ~ 4 a ~ ¢ ~0q9 v~i WE 55yy~~ 'a "c c~~E`g ~cZB3 zyyYYw rr~yyE@R ~3: '- ~ ~~tg A2'~aj C4n$+iOSUU~~d~~°~3f a(~ap~5~3dr0~<(gOE ~Iy i.., _ of ~~ ~ 3a a u ~ > 2 O m q oOr~mo oconom opp oaogoq o0 00000 oooomo p o rv~ "~ N o-no ooogoo op0 0a0oda ad a~0a 66o 66oo Np ao~ 0 o a o n N O O O O N p `~m ObgOp OC'ZOO Oqp OOODOp 00 CI pO000C10 ON0000 O '.~. a OPO Opp r'.~I00 000 0-0000 OO - OOOO .~O Oo00~0 O~ J N O N O Q b p .- O N Q O 8 0oJ O .'v p'nO OPOmOP hOO tO 00000 00 LL~000000 Ob60-O 00 O ~N W O =0N'd OOONOO NOO .yN0000 00 h0000p0 m00-O 00 y3 c13 .. O m m P N f O /~ m O e~ ~d q o mm oneeno noo m o on r.0 ma 0omuo o0oo n.o 00 0 ~0 <ONbn O~- 00 000 m0000 V10 OONNO p000- 6 g Wb O O O ai O N ~- O ~~ (~ u1NnClb mN ~OhnPn 000 ~-Pb000 000 O~OD000 OOOgQ~O 00 q ~N -NN< aNNOn OOC 00-000 ~O OPOOGOO Op0000 00 g O N T O O m m O - O T O O J OOp00 000000 000 0000000 00 0000000 0000000 00 ~,m mLL 00000 000000 000 00000 00 0$00000 00000 0O N ^ 2 N 6 O O O O O p O O O O O 8 O O ~ a a a a a a ~ ~ F ~ M n ~ J ~ ? ~ ` ~m 4 3y ~ m _ ~ ~ aw o ~ a ~ ~~ d 8~ ~ 2~?~ 4.np v ~; E'c 3~m"~ w v a3 ~ E ~ 49'~ ~5~2'S ~' ~i3^m ~ `mo3 ~a aSE~^ ~a=~$ ~$= ~~ 8 ww££ H ~~.~$ggcb9 <a;.~z2 ~~5'88~~~~.£w58gg` ~~w~` a ~i3Y'~3~~5dxWnS]ciJ~ ac`~~s'~a~a~~3v=fb'=bTF2c98g:e am oti F'3~ ~ ~a v i r z o °5 a 0 u 0 7 22 j U Cm m~ rv aoaoo 000000 000 000000 00 0000000 000000 00 0 ,~ f o000o aooooo aoo oooaoo 00 0000000 oooaog ~~ f oc f a 0 o a o 0 g o a a ~ a a x a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r a '^ w I ZU_ op _ W ~ ~ a Z~ 3 ? ~ ~ L~ ..d rn W u ~ u ~ O ~ s '^ ~ gg 8 ~Wl-Pio~F2e w ~' Nd figg'°`~d ~~E}~~$8og m~sgQ `~¢~g~~g you o~ Fy ;~~c~~2`c~gc~igLL a'3guu8~dHw~3~~un ~u°.3~fb°25~dc~6~~[fa S9 ~ O N a8 ~Q 8 88885 888888 888 8888.$8 88 88.88888 888888 8S 8 ~P m 06606 aoooo~t ao 000000 oc apoodoo 060000 00 $ 8 8 8 8 g N o 0 o ~~ ""^8 m ~p«lO 53 885tA88 e88 888A8~ 88 8x388Sg8 888888 88 ^ o~mmH o0 00 00 Noa o0 oo~mo 000 om o0 R. 3 e ~ 8 ~ ~ 8 .. ~? ig 8Q51 ~?8 53A Si~88 888 ~RA8888 88 5;888888 85;888 88 ~~ ~, ~ _mN~ Nn-Dory rn..o 0 06 oooooed o$oomv o0 ~" 10 A A g g 8 5; ~ R ar8 8 ; 51, ~'~~, 5? ~5i 5i x'88 X88 88853851 'A8 51888888 888888 88 C i i ~nnmrv 'mo'rn rvoo omm~o~ m n~6oood 0000-o ao R l0 8 ~ 8 p 8 A 8 'a ~ "' .~ m v ~ o Cr 8g 8m888 888888 888 888888 88 8$88888 888888 88 0moaoo 00 0000 000000 00 ~ o 0 8 0 ~ 0 8 r. a~ ~E ~ $51~~p 8r888A 888 88538851 88 88.88888 888888 88 R n„ ~ m~riva 6vo~orv 000 00n0oo 00 0 00060 006000 0o v - c M` a 8 a ~ ~ 8 ~ 8 8 0 w '+ ~ a a a a a a ~ ~= r- ~ .- . .- N 6 ~ (~ ., ~ ~ j 1 E a w ~ ~ ~ s m ~ ; `~ ~ y ° 8 a `li ' ~ o gFz y w ~ov ~S~i „' ~~ '~;U ~`~ a~m$ a~ 3 °~F ~aE ~ ~€ ~~ ~ ~gs~~s~sa$~a~""s~s~~a~~~~~~~~~~°s"~~~~o~~~~gN~s ~ ~ 3° ,~ s 3tif6~ -<a<m ~ o~= ~r i°. 8g ~ ~R^8 '"S8a 851 888 888888 88 8~888~8 8~885i8 88 YO M CyN' f N OO 0000 00 MM O M ONO 00 8 8 R 8 S q 8 8 a o N ~ o zo ~g m 8~RR8 888888 888 88R~88 S8 8888888 888588 88 S N N OdPMO 000 M 000 O Y 00 OO 0000000 OOOOt]O 00 l R 8 W 8 8 8 8 P8 g 88888 888888 888 888888 88 8888885 888588 83 8 - ood~o oooooR 000 ooaooa oa 0000000 ooaooo o~ ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8. 8 8 R R m!Q mg R 88858 888888 888 888888 8$ 8888888 888888 88,8 m o0 0 0 00~ 000000 0 0000000 oo~oao 00 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 S a~ mg ~ 81,".888 888$88 888 8'A ~SSo 88 bo v88888N88o888 08 8 R 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 ° -, e & ° ~~ ;g ~ S~R8R8 888~NN X88 X88888 88 N88885~8 88888 88 f N pO~vgb' O O 00 00000pOO OOOOP p00 N Q N n M O K~ O N S r O .i S T ~ ~ "m "m T 'S J N F F F ~ 1= L= ~- Z4 A _ J o a_ Z - ~ U ¢ 2 `m Z # <U ~y ': ?jE ~ ~ _g ~ cFS o ~ 9~ ~i C c E r _ ., 8 w 6 a m~ ra e 3 a ~g a ww~~~° ~e~3s=~N&`"~E~~= ~ga ~~,•s'~r~s~23~£gi<.~ ~ F ~ ~~8x~858ax~.855dubwa.,~~i yua` sr~~6.° o'vE ~' ~ ;a a o s z o 0 w a G d sS5188 8518AS8 5;88 888888 8S E888888 88888,8 88,8 ~o ~ dgnoo dpd~d$ 00 oo$doo a o8oo oe6 0 0 $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 N $ o R o O mg ~,g i 888518 8885158 $88 585188$ 8s 88E888.8 8.88888 88'5? (mj °' °ov"i:o doaNdo od od~odo o-i ddd6o o ood o ',v 51 A 8 Q 8 8 8 8 R ~ o ~ d o s ag ~ 88.$68 888888 888 8R5l888 88 8518888.8 8.88888 88',8 ~T pN~ 000~0~ 000 pON OOOO 00 G~O~000 000000 OOI~ aaaa~d~~dllll 51 53 8 st 8. 51 S. s N A O a8, 8g ~ N8888 S88e$~ 888 8888.80 08 8s888888. 88888 SS~m " ~ 8 $ 8 8 ~, S N ~ N O Y~ '~ O e8 mg ~ 888853 8s8.sS.8 888 8888.88 88 $8888.88 511e8$88 88~ i]~ ~ " ddd6~ dd orvov~ ado ad 'odo dd nSadooo ~. dada oo ',N 51 51 8 8 8 51 Tv S .- m c i m j 3 a a a 3 a a r ~ ~ '°- r ~°- ~ ~ g a "' a ~ ~ ; g 3 ~ a 8 £ o ~ ~u ~i ` ~ ~ G~ ~ i~j E g~_ ° ~ t"~ m ~~s ~ E o€ ~~ ~ ~ni~f 7c3 ga iu.a ~~VJ8u~31-..~3~~[ia~~.3r~~i.dFO~U(JZU.1~2m o `~ M8 s oaooo ooSoo~ oar aaooao no anagaaa Oonnca as ~P Oooooo 00 ~ooooo ooacoo 00 ~ o m n o 0 n a a a m n o -~ ~~ oosum _oo 000 _ oom ooooom o0 ~^ m oho9. ooon_° -oo cooac.- o0 000_ caonoN ao ~ a .- M N ~ 0 N N O °'R' ~~~ q N~nN N n n NO o~hc n oo nn NNOaova aNOOOe ~_ 3 ~'m oooor rvoo on~-Mioo nd oa d o~9, ooN- oo _ `w 0 k _ m ~ m '~ g m-Nm mNm..c Sao mo 0o mooooo ooaomo 00 ~m m0~~9 9MObNM x'00 O9 '~NOm 00000 000000 n0 S pN N mo ng i aoa oooaco oa o aooo co omooooo ooooom ~N ~, mad6 dooaoo 000 00000 0o moooac ooaoo 00 o ~ o c o 0 0 0 o mm- ~o oN oao ooNOON oo cmooooo 0 00o ao 0 ~ ~ N~-NN ONO~v O'D OOC 00'D 0OUf 00 0000000 000000 00 '~ O a m o 0 00 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ _ 0 0 LL a a a a a a a a ~ y a' ~ ~ V_ ~ _ ~ ~ _ _ L (J o ~ g~ ?Qj m ~~ m " c" E ~ Bay ¢ d~ 6 uw~i <S a ~i a EF :~ o g8 B ~W~~'~o~NE w ~ y$9'S~, ~4~~~~0~3tig~88~~ Eg¢'g+F'g~gK~S~ ~ ~€ ~~ J `~n~~x s~~$~c4a$~o°.~~ci c~~~~tiLL-. 3I~~~~~°3Ff ~~502~$S~¢iaaa j n"~- r~ ~ 3 Z"P' 8g 3 -mmnm mo von oa0 ooaoom ae .-aoor,o omepmo mo ouon p popooa d6 ompo~mo prodoo6 08 a° m o m o 0 p o v o m m p Q.~ n0 Q ONOO10 0000m P, 0000 OONn00 00 OOOOp 0,0 00000 0010 _ 22 m ON~mO 0000~m Cp OOPniGO CO OGGO000 OOCO00 OOi(bi t' ` N /1 O O O O O O C O O ~p N I[] 00000, 000000 000 p000p 0, 00 000000 00000 OHO m~ S li ooa~a ocooa~ 00o aooooo od oaodooa dooooo 008 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 6 0 0 0 6 0 oo, o,eo eo o,o o o,o 00o peo oo,oq oo, ooa o,poo gooo,om polo T~ Mg ~ eopoo 'o oooo oao 0 0 0o pa aoopodd oe8odd 6oi8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 8 6 mp ~ Of'1000 OOOf-o6 000 O~m000 00 ON00000 0m0000 00'0 2 Ory000 000'00 000 Ong-.000 00 09000G00 O~p000 O O ~- O O O r 0 o O qaF m(1 a vmN\A p001~(VN m00 n00000 04 m00,00, [VO Op O,Omm 0010 MP S =NY1 OOO OON~ ~OOO 0000000 Op OOpOO1N pO 0000Omry ppi0 CI G O Q m ~ ~- C G N m C Q O 0 _W a_ ~ j j 7 7_ JH ~ F F ti F F I- T ~ ~ ; ~ ~ E ~ m ~~E~ ~ L ~. ~ o~ ..~ ~ ; Pd ~~ ~ On O~ ~ 00 b000 00 OI-00000 000000 000 C y0 OrylO O ONON 000 00^O'OO 00 ONOOO00 000000 O N ^ ~° O n N O O N O C I O'/ImNO 00000000 00 OOP000 00 OOOOOOn 000000 O m0 ry OH1'1^O OC O 000 OON000 00 000000 Oo000p c0 h M O p ~ n o o ~ o a Q~ ~¢ °°OO f+O 00000 m00r 0000 OOO 00 00 IVp0000 000000q Op O pm o po qo oop tlo mgoo0 tlo 'oo otl E a °' a r ~ ~ o e o rv o 0 Q$ ~O q 410000 000-AO 000 0000 ry MO ONOOO00 OIV00000 00 22 00000 OOOOOre o 00 n0 ONOOOtlO 000 g a °' m n N O O ~p O O m O n p P~ m(J ~ pOOOtp O o00e 000 OOOgOO 00 00000 m~Y,0000 00 5 OOOGO 00~ 000 00000 00 NOOpOp 0000 g am - ~ _ - a p ~ o q o ~ q 0 0 y w a a a ~ a a a a r r F _ _ ~ ~ o M N U T m ~ Z W a Q 3 w yy ~E~,4 ~ g s i ~ 3 ~ ~ o o gg 7 ~w ~I ,~~i w Nd ~~~F~3s g;a~'d ai A ~_- ~_ ~~~3~~3~3a~~ab~5~35wa~w~€F`~~a~g~~sa~b~~a3$~~~~a~' o oti ~~ ~ 3a ~ i > O n SCS ENGINEERS - CTfY OF CHINO Da ~'~ $ ~oo~mry hN OOrvR 8$8 S51RN88 ~8 5;.088888 8R88~8 88 N _ _ o Nnoo _ rncodoo o~ooaq o0 53 R fl 8 + 8 e _ o _ 8 ~ o ~N m~ ~ RR~8R 8R8R88 R88518888 ~8 53888"~'R53 8578858 88 8 a0 .(1 hNN~N 6vOfOr N O nNON00 v N~00'N~ q OHO 00 R R R 8 a x~ NLL ~. naRR8 8885?~n Nob 8.8888 ~RB $888858 8~A8888 88 :~^ _ oar -nnN < q8° ryao arvonoa ,.o B R 53 R 8 ~ _ q a R a e° ~m ~ 57888 5188'88 $~S X88888 88 8888888 88.88R57 88 N R ~ -N ~i° < N~o rv°oooo q6 Dodo ood 'ooo..' o0 R B M ~ 8 S 8 8 i9j e O N O O q O e° 51m ~ ECSSt68 888RRr ~R 8R8888 Sib Si888SiR8 88885 88 ~~ .~ N e 00 v Nnn p0 000 rOp 0000 f OOOVO OO R t~ q R ~ p~i o a~ 'Od ~ 81085110 855186 ~~8 ~,g888~ 85? ~088888R 8888" 88 8 N N_ N_ q.-Cf^' Imo ONg000 m~ ~o°ooaN °ogogo °~ 8 57 R R 51 g N r n n " 6 N o ° Q I- 1= r r- F F 1= F _r'J 9 LL N N (' _ ~ a a ~ 9n_; w m'S _ r p O ~ ~ L N 9~ w D _ ~ ~ t3 ~ O d m 8_ 9 d p8~ $y m ~y c ~8 ~~ s a v`d eg o~ 9 og 3 ~2 n9'`~o ~'~1~ „'_n$'~ ~R" ~ 3~ga 8$~~$ Wi gA ~_~ i m zr a Fwi~~,A q egg ~~~ Y~E c8 g~3'~ "m ~gg frfryF ~O d' X _ °¢zv x~c~~c~a x..nb~uub 3:LLZ°O~~~c9 a` ;G~a'~6~28bi g7"'am .i oti ~~ ~ ~a u ~ r ~ O u~ ~ N8 ~d ~ `^888 R. 88R9o$ 888 8988°88 538 53888888 88888m 8a f R 8 S R A $ 9 8 n ° ~ - £ zR Qd ° 9g8iC8 889888 988 9888 88 2CS888N18 888x98 88 ao ~. tioo~o,~R mnN ~.o nao onn ooa oo Noo onRo 0 ooho o.. 8 A R ~ 8 A ~ 8 8 S _ n n a a a a a a a r r a 0 a" LL y J :~ n> o ~ ^ X S~ r w U m ~ 3 O ~ bR H '~t ' d °~ a .. *q~ a n c C ~ ~o r w aay 3 ~. m 'J _ ~ ~~ ~ ~W gg4'~o ~~'a ~» ~ym~.a _m's53mm"3~c~ a~ s ~ "g~ ~n_ Z... 8 4_ y E? m c~E = 7, B~ ~g~gw~F E` ,t i -°~ G$~~~3~3ua$":ab?c'•ubwa~wg3~~r_i~~°3°tiEd~5~2u~g ~E; v.~ _ i oti FF ~a a . E L O - 2 } q moons NmNNmm omo mmm~oo no mmopooo opoovo p0 0 erv ~'+~'~ 3 NOn.n enooon woo omn~oo ep Neaoooo o~po-o Op ~ N_ m N N p N M ~ a - e n a mmP PO ipNP -Nn OYO ~~ ;y mNO ry O~OVC~ d00 -~N0000 NO OnOOV b N 000 00 '~ m m o N m o n J moo ..p emo~o0o o~.+omoo 0 CN NLL ~ NO~'O OOON NI- X00 O~~OOO Om NNOONOOO ONO .~00 00 3 O O n - v u O n0 ONO 00000 000 00000 OpO00N- JO O ~O O~'IVN 000000 O 0000000 OOO .~v c0 QJ e` ~d ~ °' N _ N Nmo a- - ~ RRB~II QQ < ~ m .. p o _ p NN y~'W y~ N O00 00 vmN -ten 000000 m0 000000 OOOONO Oc N 0000 Om~ 000 VO uIO COONO N LL N O O~ m O ~ N ? NO OOOra Ntv O OOOO Omm ~a bd y~ OYIOnV m~'10 ONO u10000~-0 p0000Y1 00 O ~D O r N N 0 ~D O N'd a ~ '1 TJ 'A A R f N Y ~ F H ~ r Q ~( O LL N U_ ~ u n ~ ~ 3 w mg ~ ; ¢ ~ ~ w ?~ w o _~ - ~ g ,~¢ i 8- 3 ~ a ~"~ -" ~3Edg~~ ~e~ 3 mEF ~~° p8 y¢ g~c'o ~ w N~~_ ~£~0 03 sa y yy Wi ..~ 2- G Zti ~ ui SA m ru Qii_~ ''~E ~c°~w `~~ $bv~.7~ ~~° S"C; B3 ~_ a^d(g2~t4 ~tga¢u a'FijuVF27~~+233~~a ~i 3Hfd~~O acg ~JiLLSa,~~m p U %F r~ ~ 3 9g $d ~ o.-°mm _J-^n^ '°° a-oooo "0 -oo°°°o °o-Nn °° c NP - - Nv -^ 00 ryN m00000C OOONnO ^~ a W 'L 6 z Qm ed N N ~ O N m - O NNJ O vp0 YN000 NO uf0 00°O a N O~ ONNNn NOO ONN000 N I~0000^O 00 O~O 00 O ~ a 3 a a ~ a ~ n ~ . . ~ ~ ~ R ~ " U L ~ ; U O a S ~ ~ _~ VI 3 ~ .nu _m L a c$9 m ~ ~ cs ~ Ba,Wp w ¢ ~ N <:Y Q 8~ 3 $ - M wE -_~ ~DV~sb °a ~m~ Q3 m~8 3^` 8 y~ °9' i o~1 A w r ~n rY= n `$ ~ `v- 3 h g'°, a ¢a R d-'= ~~ A Fwd a9 u"i `o ru~E-~,n omXE -9~^d o8m58F~~ `6'EF g,: c; ~'= dE _ ~$~3i`~'3gUn x.. a'o`g u'c; ~acLL$;~ ua ~~.3FF6 ~Zt35£ f"~a,~ ~ r~ti r~ ~ 3a a J E r O _m9 "~ X888 88588 RR8 888888 88 8N88S88 8$8888 88 mWS N OOO OO NT ,N 00 00 Ng000000 ONOOmvt [~~ ~ .V .. ENO 'NO y ip O 8 8 8 8 4 8 S e ~ ~ -~ ~ n _ ~ ~ SR8$$ 8888,88 N88 888888 88 888$88 8$8885; 88'O Y rvN O NNNO O Oma000 00 HO mOOO NOONN 00 8 8 R 8 ~ 8 S R ~ _ q e N 8 8,^,888 88888 888 888888 88 8888888 888588 88 °LL _ 09000 Noono~ 0 000000 00 OP OOOOO 000000 00 - 8 8 8 8 S 8 - o o q ~ o 0 a~ 8 ~#888 S8,-".~88R SAS 8~r888 '~8 n5i588Si8 8518888 8S'. °'~ nNo-~o 0o N oqo am~ooo do mNOOO6o v omm o0 S 8 8 mR vu $ 88R8~ M188.88R 888 885888 $8 888888$ 58888 008 ~m _ N Nm888 wo m 000 0NO0o0 mo boo oN OO 0ooon ao 8 8 8 8 8 8 N ° ^ n 3 H ° P8 aw ° 888518 8888~R 888 88888 88 88888 N8. 888858 88 ~. N O~gmNO NVIn mN 000 '~OmO ~O nNO Ory IO 0000 N000 _ 8 8 8 8 N ~ O .~ n N 'O O a a - - a - a - r° ~ ~ r ,_ r r ~- K C _ O LL ~' U u _ _ z - a r roLL ra c~ c N ~ °^ ~ , o w ; i ¢' vFi ~9 a _ 'Ji ~ 8 3a nao' my °c z ~ ~ ~ 2 m xaP ~a ° ei.. 3 = cF 'g_ q ~e 3 w _ ='v a ~ 'i° ~ z°F °m ww 3: ma° yatio E-S`~Q'6~m~mY -S~"- e$m S$E ~w'6~5 o'mnud` rt o~ FF z3a8xZCia ua x~.a°oa vv ow x~u:i3oac~az g3~36~=~o 3cioz w3ow,<= Y ~8 ~d 4~8~8 S~R,R888 X88 848$89 88 85288888 88885352 88 az n rvoa-o ovv~~am noo orvv aH vo o~~avco ovoaoN o0 8 8 8 8 4 8 S ° ~ N o s8 m~ ° 88888 858N;8R 888 8888R8 88 85288888 888858 88 ryA ~ N 00000 ooTao~ 000 ooooov o0 on ooooo oooovo _o 8 '" 0 8 8 4 8 8 v ~ 0 ~ o 0 ~~ ed ~S;SS~R 8852lC~° SRS 888488 Sib 48885288 8.88858 88 , ,noon oo~,~a_ am0 ooo NOS No ;~aoo_o„ 08oo..a as N m " N v N 8 R F R 8 52 S < "_ S ., e'= ',g 8 8528628 884859 889 588888 88 5888888 888888 88' H „~ oho^ vo rva ~,~ a0y oovo0o 0o dNOOOOO 000000 00 a 9 5 s s a s 5 o 0 0 0 ~R 'g 8 89~'~$ ~852~IC8 9~'8 988888 88 45188888 85i885R 88 ' a0 ~ ne'"~vn Nm~unm~ N~o rv0oo0o od n~oovov o^oovo ao 8 ~ 4 8 8 8 8 s n _ ~ ~ n aP ,d ~ oN8o8 880~~0 888 88518$8 X38 8 889528 8578008 80 NI 8 4 b R Si 8 m w4 ° ~ n h F ~= O ~_ O + N ~ ~ _ ~ '~ '' w sg ~ w ~ ~, g' ~ o °o o .pM' w . g~., ~ ~w ,~3'~'o ~S~'Eww s-~n8? '^-~~om-3~~'a Ri_ gpigg`°o~~ ~-_ z ~e ~ ca°dz°u3~tgg3a$zwn'b5i~~bw3r-4~"~`3 b~~vn ~~3~=s6~2S~23$~g gia< u o~= ~.= z° 3u ° s o - Q; &g F 888$8 888888 888 8851888 88 8588888 888888 88 ~, n °odoo d°oo ' °oo o ^ood °° oo o6ado 000000 °.. ' 8 8 8 A 8 S 8 8 0 o y o n n o eR mg 9 88858 888885 a8$ 88So88 88 8858$88. SSS888 88 8 n h ocooe o0000o a o0 0oooooA 000000 00 ~ 8 S 8 8 8 $ $ 8 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 eo NLL ~ aR888 o8°n8ti R88 8~R8888 R~ A888AN8 8808851 88 •, 8 8 53 8 ., n ., ~ ° a°8' hm ~ oR8~51 88voAry °88 8~~~88 ~8 8p888.88 888o,RP o8 , R 8 A ~" N~' i0 8 a e n N m p z8 °d 8 88853k 88~•~5i~ 8S8 SSS888 $8 "'88888 888858 88 y.. n ono 00 000 0 000 no ^oo oono 0 oeao c0 ~ 8 8 8 $ 8 8 b e e o n N ° ~° mg 8 8853518 888A88 8S8 8A8888 88 51$888518 8518888 88 8 a= ^ acm^~ ooorvo0 000 rwon0o ~o ~vaooo~vo omoamo 0o q. 8 5i $ 8 8 8 51 8 m - rv ~ . ~ ° a a ~ a a a 7 a _ _ F o a ~ ~ ._ ~ 4 C ~_ y N tll ~ m ~ .~'~ m~ 0 3 y n "y ~ ~ ~ ~n 53w p m. °i a ~~ X c g ~ E" E 8 r g u ay e -4 ~ < s ~ c v ~~ ~ ~ °_5'°ie ~4N'9 ? ~`.n55 ~~ 3g~a ob' 3a°~g ~'r o ~ ~ w~ `~- ~ C~$E=F ~`~~da' d~ d 8g $~g ¢ Eg RgRu B' %t z m -~ in°d~8 xi cg4VaxLLa°b~uu°bw ~cLL ~3b~ua ~LL3 F2a~b~~35£S ~n am p ~~ o'c ~~ z` ;a E > o c; N ^~ ~ hN NI~O O 0'00 CO T O01000 .)O ~N00000 ONOJ _ N 0N~ O - _ m ~:m ° _ o ~~ ~ ~O _ N o ,~ CtT 00 a~0 ... '~ N O 0000 00 0000 00.__ TOO N ONOON~ OJ O Q N ~g J N api pLL N N O (~ O 000 000 ^ 000 NOONq O.~ 0p 00 ^ O 000 00 m00000 000000 ,~~ v O ~P 0 0 O m of tNV atl '~ 'il NipO C O 0 _ ONOO 00 ... o ovL ••00000 N O 'O 000000 n JO y _ ' O OhO00m i~ ~d ~ _ ~ J rv ___ ooonorv oco cooooo O N ^ N _JOOOOO ooo o,~°~h o oc _8 F o o N - _ ~N ed - Imo ~ ,. mo,~ _ ,Y - "_ oo coo _O ooo ono am mo aoooono Jooo °' $ o -_ o~ a x o ~ - ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ a u ~, ~' ~ x X ~ ~ Q ~ 2 Z _ W 3 a~ c W ~ V U ~ S` ~' ;;h c xi ~ ~ " ~ _ pp y ~p aW, ~~~'m]E J 1~T~'~~EU'13~OE00~~~ CAS x~m93NCQ ~m'.B Q t? K ..~ i _ „~ ax„a5`5~~-,_d,z3~°~a~o35~gEEw~~~~W ~=_ a a~8s£~"-~' .i °$c<^ J q oNrvrvoo noo asooao ao oomooao ooeoNm oa o e d ° Doooo ooooo- -00 \y ~,, _ °oooo_ co -oooo aoooon co ~ _ ooa a oN oooo co omoocoo 000 00 0 F N~ 000 00- O a00 0 °00 00 ONO COO 0000000 O m o 0 0 _ n o _ o m o 0 ~~ o ooa 000 00 000 ° ° 0 ° ooaoorv °oooo 0o a _ f -~oom coma - co~o_ ~o - Ndoao a ~ Nm N ' O O .. ~. ~ .- h - ry 0 ~m ~g $ oro-o o a oom ooo00j o0 omooa ope ooooo 0 or0mo oonon o0 000 00 o~aov ooooov ooh am ~ _ - m - o o ~ o 0 e~ g 8 °O~~°, ~osN<- aso m OO°0 °° °oe ooooo moaoo 00 n- < o00 ~odoo $ 0 0 ~ N _ m o h o a Qoe ad q ooooo voomao 000 ooooov ao onoommo o~avoo 0 n E-tl amoo6 aooNOd o00 oo oN OOd ed orvooaoa moooo o ~ m O N O N N O N v ~1 H a ~ a a - a a a ~ c _ _ _ _ _ _ ~r a _ ~ y 1~ U m¢ o} c a ? ~ pp ~ m y ~ _ ti m `~ O E d r ~, x ~~ ,. m gay ~ ~ ~ ;° n8~w~ w amp ~ s a 8` 3 ~ - m '^E F iO E~`2-ma$ g 3-oEF s5d og mw°9' :~Si< w „' ~nda wc~~c a3 -N a py a A ~__ z''- 8 F ~' ~ ~ ~$E ppin `~E o0°5 Gc $g m,`S~°. ggw Fg gr.. x. ~ z .9 $e~c5 sE83uuxun55uu~w ~.`=y z?i ~c+a ~LL3 c`Z6~b~~88~'Eaa~ - ~E ~~ ~ 3a O i > O ., - ~ of t~ ~j $g ~ 00000 oaooom o0p e0c00o Oe e00o0o0 000000 00.0 0p cwmoc p0ooo0 000000 0p s o % m o a o c c C~ mg ~ 000000 000000 000 000000 00 0000000 000000 oa o 0 000 00 000 06c 'odoo 0 0oo6dd$ 000060 00 O N O O O O O O O O O ~ O O Nm ~ mN000 OOmbOm m00 Qry0000 Cp N -0000 COONON NOO _OOO OO G Om~O OOOOOrv o N' ~ vOCIVVO 0000_4 00 8 m N _ N rl v m O P,M F~ j rvmmmm mmm-mm non -Nmmoo mo oeoo 0,00 -OO-N o0 N b A NNOVn -00004 000 ONV000 vG Vv00000 r00 OpOV 0018 a n m o n R R o o ~ n0nnn eom 0oeoooo 0000 00 a- vy - NOmal l'1 O Nmitio 000 000000 NG =0O000NOO C0j000 Oo~B n _ O O N : O O p p 8 On OpO mnO 000 no0 v0 QH m¢ _ OnNV OO ~OnO ryv m 00000 9.-O OnO 00 O N n - 0000 N OOOOmOO -0000 00 8 N 0 „~ v o m ,°e e H a a 3 a ~ ~ s a a o ~ ~ ~ _ ~e m~ U ~ ~ S O ~ m H W U 8" 3 - rn y v" a~E`a ~ i~~ ~ ~Zt Sod ~ -S~ s v E„ c &~k'~ a dyy~ E ~~ ~i o~L~~ 2~ c ~n c ~ n ~_} p ¢ g yy~{ y o~ ~~ ~ ;$~3 i~~34t~a$x~n°8~~ci b~2: 3~3~~~~~LL3Fi6°5~~~~~~~aa m' O KK Z O N Q 900VO ONNNOO 0100 Omo000 00 OOmP00,0 OOOONm 00'p ' TS y1~ _ oopap 000 - Gov ooooo~ 00 0-0000 oooaOn o0;8 o m ~ - a r o - e ' amog9 avnnvN o9a pov.vap 0q ma o,oo o, 000009 00 0 Qa N~ ~ ON000 OONnOn 00 OOOOCO GO ONOOCGO 9C 000000 O g a °' N - 0 o m o 9 N O 6 p N C O O 0000 000-h~O 000 OOOOOV OO 000000`1 OOGON00 00' @'~ eGI - -noun vpnnoo o.-o aoamoa do moodooN o1.,~o 6e o0'8 ~m " ry V O - - ~ N ry O eb ,Ip ~ 0r0_9 OON00~ 9Om OOOOaG OOm OmOCa09 9COag0 COiG 2 oromo oonoNm oo ooodoo o O~o6oo0 6eoa0d o9~g Nm 1 a o m o 0 ~ o o ~ 0 0 . ~~ i~j 8 vawo mmmomm mmo nooooa o0 000900 omoo~o qo. N- • v1N ~-m(V mOmNV~ 00000 00 Nn 0000000 Om0000 00 m O O N Q n O Oi O q ,1 OV000 0000100 Op0 OJ?009 •O OnO0 O1 p!0 ON0000 00 O aN eLL ~ ON000 OOOG NOO 000 OONOOO VO O~OOO~<G CIry0006 00$ q iV O N N O ~ • ~ N O a_ a '~ a a a a a F Y h F ~ F 1- 1- :] ~F ~_ LL /j N ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4;_ w ~E 3 0 ~ ~ w S ~ 9 v aw ,q ¢ 6 8 3 ~Q ~'~'iv~4d w zg N'3'c`~ESd_p~' vS ^~~?y X2'~g~gp~agggg R, ~" z ao€ g~ ~~2a~3~23~3d$xLLaS~uu$s$cLLg~~~'~0~~3~=~3ASo~SSg~E'u'am ' N ~8 8g ~ 5153538 5358518& r5i8 SSp88$ N8 8$5,8888 888.5538, 88 ~ 8 ~ q ~ N 53 S m ~- - r N ~ m O ~R mg ~ 88N88 8851$538 S88 ~4~888s 88 8N88888 888880 88,$ S 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 N O - 0 ry I+ p m'S3 eg S 8 888 88888 888 888858 88 8888888 8888N8 88~,N Cm ~ Ooo OO oo ooo ~OOOO oom6oo CO6 om cao6o 0000-0 0 I~ tV O ~ O 8 N S p Jf pp pp ~ ppO pO CppmO OOp OO p'uu11 pp pp pp.-Opppp O m~3 ~g ~ SOI~OH SO ON5I0 Op0 OQ0000 SO C!N~O~O,nN OOOOOS ~~ E AN m NOO wICN COOm NV Vpo00pO po000 OOY1 ~wN OOO~M1 000000p00 ~~~ L~. M1 8 O O ~ N NN ~ O a O O N $O ~g ~ 5aw51ass srsM1sisz sss sszs~sss as a~85;sixls as.sass ss s C rv~nreb mnmm.-~ inoo orvQ ooo 0o n~oerv:~ mo a o 0 8 8 8 $ $ ~ 8. 8 $ ry o 0 aR ~g ~ 8$888 8~5i8%i8 $88 X8.8888 ~$ 88$8.8853 5.888518 88~,: ~~ ~ OY~ONO OOOO~-Qm 00 000000 ~O 00000000(~~I 0000 ~0 OO rv 8 8 5; p K' K'. 53 8 o rv e < ~ ~ - o a 3 a ~ a a a ~ r .- .- ~-° .- r° a a 0 ~ $ u y g ~ ~ ~ ~ $ 3 N g ~ ~ g o F S a d a ~ $i ~ ~ .` ~ $~~ ~~2~3~~3~~u~~.a~N~cg~~aF°g~~~'~g~3~38~~€3~fLL``~~am o Sg td 88888 888888 888 8853888 88 8.88888.8 888888 88 n o6opp 000 00 000 o Noao 00 oSoo6oo 600000 00 N n 8 8 8 A 8 8 8 8 5 n a?Z ~~ ~ 853888 588888 888 885888 88 8888888 888888 88 5 o~ooo 000000 aoo oooa mo 0500000 p5oaoo oa :" ~- N p p p N O O V g R R R n o O O p ~ R O ~?~ 8g °g 88.888 885888 888 888888 88. 8588858 8518858 88 8 a0 OOOOO Oo 000 ooooCO o oNONOOO Omoaoo Vo 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 5 8 N ~m Sg 8 8853851 ~88~;08 m88 ~88SK' 88 85188888 888.858 88 :C V~mnp O NO O OVOCOppOGp OIFOOGNO 00 OOVp00 5 Cl n ~. O O 5 O N f~ m R O Q O O ~g 8 ^8 888 888888 888 888888 88'88858 8 888588 88 8 ~o n omoa0 00oooa o 0 000000 00 ooopdoo oooaoo 0 N O p Y 8 R R R r p 0 m O G O N 'R Sg ~ 85588 5535885 558 885888 88 8588858 888855 88 am N ~~0eo rvmmov^ nrvo onNOOO o0 mooo~o oooo..n oo ' 5 8 8 5 8 8 8 8 f m o ~ o ~ d i i i 'd i i i '~ F ti ~ r H ti ~ O O ~ N y 3 n" a ~ > _ ~ gg w a ~ ~ ; z Sp 3 Q5°~,i ~~i wx, md'9 '^~S3~~C3~~a 4„°-~~~ ¢~y~~ Y- ~~# ~ Fw ~g g~E g i E g g g u ~E yy ~ ;a ~3 x~~~~8a$LLa°S~°~8b~a~~.z~5~c~`~a~~~~~3~80 ~3~~~sas~ - e eg Cd 88888 885888 888 858888 88 8888888 588888 88 8 a^ ~°,~ 00000 000000 000 000000 00 oR6odoo 000000 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 o R o eR ;;g $ 88888 888888 888 888888 88 88.88888 888888 88 8 00000 00000 o 0 000000 00 0000000 000000 00 ~ a= S 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 e8 sg 8 8538$8 8518888 888 888888 88 Sg8888.8 8h88S8 88 8 o^dnc 000 000 000006 00 oNdo60d wooNO oc a-° m 8 8 8 8 8 l4 ~' o H o!~ Sg 8 58888 888888 888 888088 88 88858,88 888888 88 8 0 o0ood aooooo 600 00 '6 60 600000 oaooo0 00 a- _ n a, 8 0 8 a a. a o $ e~ ^g ~ 88.888 88.8888 888 888888 88 8888888 8888 8 88 ;.n Hv~ooo 00~ ego oocooo 0o a 0000 0$0000 c0 8 8 8 8 S 8 ~ 8 '3 $ n o o e $ o mR Sg ~ 8K8528 888858. 888 88851.88 88 88.8888 888888 88 8 ~m n ord~c aoooo Doe o N~oo o dgooeeo o~ooco oa A 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ m ~ R ° a a a a a a a a_ ~= r° . r ~ ~°- r° r a `a a a n" r N F pp vl W U U F Q b ~ ~S $~ - w``gfifi~E~9ru$€rP'`~ gn`~~cd_ gg; 3~~°yy$e~gqpq~ wagSggRg~~$ ~ i ~ ~ 9 ~^d cgYZC~~~aii:u5]u ~4bw ac~.~~Cl~ud ~LL 3ti 7dr ~~2~~5>?LL3a des' ~ ~ 30 ~ f > o ~ u o~ F~ c~ eg °g 88888 888888 SRS 588888 R$ 8888888 588888 88 8 ~a ao ao oooooe o0o poo0oo Qo 0 oedoo aooooo om rv 8 R 8 8 8 8 8 8 o ~ o N ep S;g 8.888 88$888 888 8518888 88 8~888R8 8.888518 88 8 [gym CI I ooOnO pONrvoa o0O NN0000 Oo 000000 0000'0 00 8 n m 8 S 8 „ ~ m ~ 53 8 N o a a a a a a a a F°- r n .- i- •° ~ a a 0 o y n N y ~ pp ~ - O pp `~~ d >~p' ~ ~ ryp 3 A z y 8 3 W Uyy ~ L '~ ° d ~~ 9 6 F iR2 N g o~ ~ O p ~ 8 ~~gg?yy33 ~~~ w ~4~~g ~~~ a gbq;~c~ = ~N}~~ ~~~d Z ~ °~ VU~~ dr °~~ ~ ~t p y~ ~ . ~4TRT~ gyY¢a 3L~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~na5 ~ uE Z ~~ a S n ] i u ~ O O U' F r z [ 0 0 O j LL o m U OL /F 3 t~ q ~onmPa ccpmpp covaco vo c~npcepp oacv~s pp a ~~ `S - <p vpaopo -Np pp,nppo and d~ecOpc ppcpp- ao ~ N - N m N v ~ N O 'mR mg 8 p.. so^ - aoo porn 00 onooooo opro - aN - N aoe - N-- --oo0 06 odpopo Dodo-o op - m ~ m o m o o - o ~m ~~ ~ op p aNOh pp p0rooo 000 !00 0 ooopoo op c ~6op aop o00 o6~pdp -ovooo N ~ ^ O O O ~ O O -~ $~ g Dore. o nm o00 000000 00 -movomN oooopo ~q d oOrOm o00~NV O00 060000 OG N o00~N OOOOCO Op Q N~ m - O - - O O O $ O O ^p ~(] ~ iD NI~IN vqO VQfly POO Oew000 O n-aOVNr pOpOp~ ~p 2 ^ f .- - ON 000 OOt~1000 d0 NNOOOnG 000-0 00 Q O O v O ~ O ^~ ~(~ ~ v000 O-~ aNV 00 O^v0 m0 00000-N pO 0000ma0 000 a~ R oryoNO 0poomN ~-oa oapopp Hp 'o aom pop o N O - L N O O a a a a a m a ~ _ _ _ _ ~ b' ~ ~ y y ~ ~~ '' z a ° a o ~ ~ w 4~ o -~ 4' i -8~ x a ~" ' d8 a'w'e w ~ d ~ $s 3„v z 8" 2 ~ 3 a '~~,~ N 8° ~„ u~E~ $ ~e~ 3ao28 __ g~ 8 Nw ~"~ 4g r y~_`a "~E~3u 3~~a v '~~ wgE~ Ru, i e g 9 ~°d~t4iScg ~tga ~x ~a°8~UU8~a~`=~°.i~~~~n~~3~~6rd~28bi!~iaac' oL ~~ ~ }n E ~ O (n f ~Q ~ gogo ooomoo 000 q mogo 0o q ooPOOO oooooe pe _ n oodoG ooamoo 000 oHOOO do oho d6o 000000 ~ 0 o n o ~ 0 0 °'R'. ,~~ ~ °oryooo a°o°oo°OOO o00 000°o°o°G 00 o~oo°Go o° aq°~ooooo °q a° 8 N O O O p ~1 O O O O ~ ~ O ~p $ °OO OOOq 000000 000 OOOO O O ~OOOO ONOgOO ~~ O 00 OOg000 00 OGO000 OOG ONOGOOO gva0000 OO 0 G O q G q q q q q m s -Gj $g ~ onmryo, moan, v~~ moo mvogom o0 0ooo o,ro ggeo.o ooio hm m OOH NNE w00~0m NOO O~OOGN GOO O~pOO OGG 000000 00g 3 N P q ~ N m O ~ O o ^v~ ba P000 00000 O 000000 000 OOOOh 0000000 dG 2 ~ emooo 000000 000 000000 'o oodoo~o 00000 0o g 0 ri o 0 0 0 ~ 6 0 -~ mg p owo mnmomm o .-oo0 00 omOOONO ooooonm qo ~m Z ~3 _ ~6 dw-dom ~qo o~~uood o0 6i6o6ro 00 000 0o g N N O N ~ N h C ~ ~ O a a a a a a a a `a ~ 0 d ~ ~g p w P u aw ~ k' ~x U 4 B h w ~~ ~ f~ y ~w}e~' NE~$EZ'ggyy~~F~~s~~~$;a g yg. p~ppwa$~ ~~- y9y ^~~c$~~c~4t~axLLUb]c°i~b G+arLL~3~~u ~~~;F-~6~5~~c48~g'~Iuam o u oti ~~ i 2a S t~ Z a O °< mg ~ oaooo oop po ovo oooooe o0 oooeooo 0000 ~'' n 06066 060000 000 00000 00 oga 600 600000 00 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 ~^ m~ g ooopo °00000 000 opooop ao 0 oepoo 000000 00 b o aoaoo~ oo~ odoo6 oa o'oao6a 006000 ~ (pj C e .. 0 o a o a 0 o $ 0 0 0 0 mo $g p oa one eO OO'ooo ooQ oeopoo eo nooooo mNOOmo Oe ^_ d ONONO OOO 00 GOCO00 O 000000 v1~p000 '~ N 0 Oi O N a O O o O Qo $g $ oaooo 000000 000 000000 0o ago e'o oo oooaoo 00 ~ ~~ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p d 8 0 0 ~~ n(~ {~j ml~pp0 OOOGCa pN0 OOOppO 00 OO O,p CpO ONO C.np Oo O R 3i ~VOGO OopOpN ONO pOp000 00 Opp0000 O~OOOO op '~ p ~ p o o e 0~8 mg ~ OOOOmO p00000 00 OOO OG 0O v 0000 pNGO O o0 n f')On0 OOOOGO OO pG X00 00 pON vGp OOO 0 0 e o o e p - v N ~ a a a a a a a ~-° r ~ ~- . . .- ° 2 ~ o ~ ~ ~ N V+ `~ - U' ~ ~ ~ ~ 7i i g n" j 'c c ~ ~ w o gm m ~ ~~ $ ~ ~; E 8ar~ w ~ ~ ~ ~s a E 3 ;t8 ;o} oz 8g 3 ~¢~ ia~Ni w r¢w8ap S~,'~o3~~gyy ~ ;.~ ¢a pS ~ 2 mE g~ ° ~a~c4~~tg 4tga$~n°6 ~ci c4b~d'c`~".~3~~c~ac~u3H3b°~o ~c46~g~N a"m' p ~ ati rr i ~ 5 ap ng a ooo o'o voeaoo ooo voeooo go ooaoooo ooovoe o0 ° S 0 0 o c o o S o 0 Qty gg i oaoao oonmoa ~-oo omoooo 00 omooooo oooorvc o0 0 ~m i 66drva co6ooo rvoa 000000 00 omooooo aooon6 0o g m N r N O m 17 O '~ ~ a a a a a a ¢ r r a ~ o a ~ ~ LL N ~ _ ~ A 3 g o '" ~ a $~ w 8 3 0 ~ a N y w ~n a n ~ `s Asp RR8_ ~i 3 ((11 g q` . ~ (vp~ n w qyp~~ of ~ _ ~J, Z~ • QT~~Py yg ~F~ W rggN¢R /IC'g gCp93 y, c14$4b ~y 7i .`,¢8 ~[[A 4o^a v off ~~ g 3$~cg'~~Ig4~a$Z~a'8 ~ci tgb~dtiWZ~~~t~~~u~F~6F~~QC4d~€~a¢m' X K O N SCS ENGINEERS - CITY OF UPLAND Z' ~o mw I n qnp p~-Mb00 b00 ~OOOOOM O ~OpObN~O 00 p0 000 000 O $LL i dpom vi oo~N-~ rioo 00000 :o Id66dddo Doom ~8 ~~ - m m H Yi N . v - m O 8c~ Ow ~ ~Ngry 00 ulO NV1 .~ O~-O 00000 Na OOOrO r-O OOP OIOM OOIo ON O 'Vi0b O ON Ot'j0 ON OOOOC NN NOO OO if10 OOOOC)O 00.8 -- - m I~ q O ~ ~ _ R _ ° ~+8 <jW Q ON~-gq b~mmm 000 000 O vO,O NmO p000NhN 001 O^N J{ iry~S mN OO b~O OOOONO~ Ono 00000 $O v~00vO~0 OOON-h Op ~B ~ LL ry O N b N N ~ 0 O O~j ~~ I Mb O,AN OmvmmO NOO OO,bOQ Opn CIO ,0000(OmP OO,OOf ~- 0,010 Ln - I NCIN OIM1 OOONOV MOO O ~O MOOp O~Ob OOOOONVj 0018 m I~ I C{ q N 0 0 C! C/ ~ ' n O o s I gOClm ONmb 010 ONO NOOOOV O -OOOMAO ~400~ 0001 mcj uSLL I ~ N0n 000~0~ OC)O ONOOOC ~10 u1000 N1V OO f Op0 O 18 YZ- q N O NI O O N ~ - 0 O ~+91. ~w ~ °~i °p vo eo~aboa =vO°o °oop°p°°°o Nv r:nooo~o 000ooo .°n oai8 n Q o 0 N VI O N O O b F n O 1(1 a VI O a s a a a a a a r r ~ r ~ ~ r z ~ w E o X u a m~ 8 3 ~ v ~ S ~ $ § w ~ti ~ _LL ~+ a s-0 3 e R ~` E ~t ~ ¢ ~ d N ea a ~ Bg } ~ ~$~ ~ e- $° °~~a 6a SL~+ 3 $142 ;o""~ [ r K 219 rna?m'3 S~2~a3 .E6a ~gll ~j gRa g" o ~`- B wyy~~E ~ ~ N a LL ~s ~ z' 4 Bfi£ yyv 8~ ~ 9 0 9 2~cY ¢~~ ~~i~a°~ ~c4g GI~~ i3F Z~q i~ap $~F~6C~~I~~~4.LL Sa a"~' p u p~ ~F p ~6 6 ~ ~ ~ 2 O N 1- a ~~°-°. e~ ~, SSS88. 8885188 888 8$8888 88. $88.88$8. 888888 88!52 N ~O'O'h ~ b~0 NGO N600O O00 ~O ObRq'~N On000~~ OOi $ 51 8 8, 8 S ~1'l1 8 8 8 _ ry _ 8 ° ° -R ~w $ 88888 52885288 888 "5188.88 8.8 8888528 8.$888$ 88'r Lim ~ - ONOO NIVONOO 000 ~'1NOO-OO ~O O OO OOm ViC OmgON' OO N I ~ 52 8 8 ti 8 8 S n o m ~ .. N ° e- Nw ~ N~$~m 51518m52s1 888 8.5;8888 ~$ m8.8$g538. 88ss,m51 88 ',$ rya ~ N bq ,n 51 8 8 8 51 8 $ ° n m N `o ° m52 ed ~~858 88~51~52 888. 8~v; 8.88 515V1 85388888 8.5588.528 8$;%V1 am ~ a ary NOOdOOONO np000V~On~000 H~ -~OOOOOOOOOHOONOOOO ~P N u1 1rN~ O C! 1$A ~ O O p N ° a N ~ ~ ° -"' ~w ~ Si 55855 8$8515151 Si88 858$888 8S g88$58~8 8888518 88;F ab N f n• NOI~Nl~ fOO OO ON~OOO :00(VNC OogO~ O N IN 8 52 8 8 58 A 8 ° . .. ~ _ v~' ~ o ~~ ~w ° 88y~8818 85188.55 8N8 8.5258855 528 5;8888$8 888888 88',8 mm ~ q ^~Crn OONOOnr 000 O'OOOO (`~ (S`O N°OOhHO OO OOOONO ° '.b N 52 iu 8 A 8 8 8 n N 0 a ~N ~ N O '~ ~ 'd 3 8 7 y l_ Q F F Y F F H F_O ~- F Z o E b ~ N o ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~g E i ~ o `Ra 5 0 ~~ w ~s ~ -LL 5 a a8 ~ o E; ~ $ rg w ~ ~ eo a°E d 8- 3° ~ ~~~ cm 8° ~c3 ag 6°d 53~ 3 e~F 3°° 3 ~ m~~2io~~~! aw. U183 a~~E5i;~y 3 €°v4 gg gfi= Sm 5 - ~ gr- 9 w 5 m= o DAN a - pagi 71o RgF ° Mai: o 9 ~~z3i~3~8~'x~d~au3$~e~LLZ€~rua~g3c`i3:boa3~i~3°°<a c aE ~~ z° ~ i &8 ew ' 8888.8. 8.0888.8. 8.`3.8 888888 88 88.8.8.888 8.8.8888 88!8 04 ~LL ~ OWNNn v0 O NOOOOV ~O OOOONVN 000 OOZY h ~ O 8 R S 8 8 8 8 S 89 ~LL ~ 885188 8885;85. 5.88. 888.888. SS 8888888 888888. 88'8 ON 0 N ONb O~NO~v OWO Ov0000 YIN HO q Y)0 CGOO1.~ Olx 0 ^ I 8 53 8 8 S 8 8 8 ~ 9 N 88 ~LL ~ 888088 s8&888 8.85 888$88 88 8.8$8888 58.8888. 83,E ~ o am o 5; 8 8 8 8. 8. 8. 8 m & ~$ ~LL i 88888 8518888 888 888808 88 8888888 888888 88 X51 ~~ ~ mOO O. 0 veo 0 8 5i 8 8 S S 8 8 p 0 ~ 0 8 _ ° 88 ~w ; 88.5.88. 8.$88.88 888 5188888 88 8888858 888888 85;8 aN _ i e N ~ 000 omocc- ~O mddd~dno oNOOOB oo~ I 8 S, 8 5; $ 8. 8. 8 ~ ° u 'R n 88 ~w SSS88 888888 888 888888 88 8888888 888888. SS'g ~C ~ O O~Ont VOOO 100 f0 ONCOOG t^0 N^OOO N'O OOOO CUI OOIm N N8. 53 (8V. S 8 Q 8 8 8, Cr al N N N ~ O a 3 a a ~ 3 3 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z o E N Q N i n m 52 ° ~ ~ ~ g; fn ~ mg a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° w ~ ~ ~ -'w 5 a S$ $ z g E^ v 8 F~ w ~$ H ~o E ~ 88 ; ~ ~~~o ~5"f'~ w n• 8_`a ~~s`d"8~ 3~ga v5= 3S:gR ~s~ o ~~ 8 Fai~fr : N~ aE =Z~g y'E a8e gg~gF~w gg'3 gSUE& ~ g 9 ~ai3i~c4~~~$~a°~~u"5g~a~LL~€b~c~abg3~~8~bo23~£~s~<~ o ~' o~ ~~ i 3 &o mw i mmogm ovmneo mpp -m000O o gn~oram o-oON~ 000 NP - ~ vivodm 6oNNOp od -N0006 ed dNKO~cd- d-m6nK o ~8 m q m R N m ~ m ~ o qN vN-f~ ~ OHO ntaOg00 pOOO I~vION00 p 0000400 ONOO- 0010 Om ICAO-O pO 00 -0000 ~O OOOOn00 OOOpOrO OOiB am N r q O H q O q N ~ ry O nOOrpO 000 ONOp00 OOOg00, 00 001 ~m ~LL - .:N ~OO~ OOOfV ~n CEO ON0000 ' TCOONCO OOpOO~m p ~p O tV O R ~ ~ N ~ R p ~~ ~W O ' OOn OO~q~O 000 ~-N000 " NN00000 O~OOOOp 00~ ~odvi oo-~~n o0d ogn6cp ui~ dg6ddoo o' 0 00;8 am R ~_ o v~ m I n q O ~ ' N O p Om~ p0 NOU1NO X00 ONO000 p~ gnOO1V O OOOnp 0010, e^! $LL ~ rnomN -oq-i 'oo o-~dpo on vigoo~~p pooood o g am N q p _ R m N n ~ a p ~NO~-~- OOOOry~ 000 p~00pN 00 0000 ~~-0 000000 0010 ~LL m OOO ~n 0~~01~11~ Ono ON000' 'O GOO NYIO COOONO p018 m N o 0 n - N ri o 3 3 3 ? 3 3 3 F a a ~ y u o p a c y ~ ~ uwiW~ .~ ~ n o ~ $ " ? 7 w jO U_ ;(b S ~yy44'8 i $ ~ E n U .'QRS~F ~ w ~ d t/~~ ~Q ¢ E EEj~ J E< ~< Se y 3 SQ ~ p Za Y w¢ Z~°9r a Z, SONrg ~{,QESe~Fg a3'i a°° 5glg~i '~cgRo""VBT ~ 9 u~i~~cgi~t~~~~s u~a°°05u~o rudtiLL2F~~~~~g3F-~a~O Ft ic45iuf~a"~ p LL of ~ y i 3a i? E r o m ~ _ adLL ~ 88888 888888 88$ 888888 9.51 o$$o8a 8a8 888888 88' ^ H oo aamaaa a aooo as e 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~'_ ~~ ~ Se~8~8 ~8~AaA STAB m88888 88 X888«p8 88888 88 ^ N Novo manrvom aooo ao o66nma a6oomr oa ^ a A 8 8 !0 R e a e ~ _ a ~8 ',d ~ B~Si a~8 8AR8SA 888 A4A88. 8. Si.8 85588$A8 888888 88 _ oaoNaw o0o rvr~inoo noooNBo 600000 00 ` A 8 R R A 8 8 N m _ w ~ o 0 ~s ^g ~ ASt~AA RaRaaR aaA aaaaa~ sas a~sssAa assess as a ^ f ~m Nv X00 nON NN~4O ~O NO NOO~HO pOO0NNO OO v$ N A iC A yry A p v .. .. N N n O a8 ~~ ~ rv'A~AB 8o8So8 888 0'08888 ry8 5i8888~8 88888N3 8a ~ p ""vi 8'mrv o am o Noo ^ oooa a6 mo oo. _O oooovN oa 8 8 8 ~ !0 p a m _ ~ o N N ~8 8d ~ 88888 880 88 888 88 888 88 88$8885 888888 88 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 N ~.+ o ^ o r~ o 0 a_a '3 l A i a a a r r° r .- ~ ~ ~ t=. .~ n 0 d - N _ Y ~ Z U 'm P~ -~~ S g i ?~ E 8 wq w y 6 '~ ~3 ~rE q b b .1 ~+^m- ° ~r~ A ~w3 ~2a ~S~1a w m993'? '^ ~3Y~ ~s BgZ yS ¢4~y gR ,%~8' ~ ~_ v~wi~~cg i~tg ~(ga~x LLa~7U~.~~dFw ~;~~~ab°:FI~~~~Q~~g ~fa im F ~ oti ~~? ~ ;a a .. F r z o c~ ry, PA. $d ~ 088$ 8088880 oR'n8 ooogoo 8~ o~ooooo ~vgooo o~ 8 a 8 S S 8 R 8 0 N n 0 P e8 ~g ,°y X8888 S.S Brv~a S~8 8"8888 !08 $A888.p8 8888~~ 88 ~M ~ OM1 O.^I Oh„ ON[OJ000 m0 Nry00~`1N0 OOOnN~ 00 O N` f N p ry a ~J N ~ V~ O n m M1 n m ~n 1'1 O eR ~d ~ °~RRS ,885t~88 .R 88 ~888Sq 88 ~A8S$~8 SS788~R8 88 (N - rvM1rvnO i-O~C O N C N OpNp p .Y 000 0 O$pONO CO 'R J~7 .~: O O 8 aQ N O N B p ~ O PS 8g ,~ 58888 888888 888 888888 88 8888888 888888 8S 8 ' 00000 oopoop ooa 000000 0~ ooopooo oooood on a' ~ N 8 8 8 $ S 8 S 8 d o ~ o N ~~ 8d ~ 8~8R$ $8~Nf88 5788 tifC8$8l0 RS ^~888N8 8~$8R08 88 R ~ R ~R '^ 8 8 8 8 a 7 S ° o ~ ° am Rtd ~ 8888 oo88oA RNa 888588 88 ~Si88888 0000800 ga N H Y p p 8 R S 8 A 8 8 (V I C O N O O a a _a _ a_ a a ~ 't F L r i- F 1- L ~- 2 Q N N t ti ~ U ~ d ~ # 3 w O y Y # a q J G t} D i O T B Iw- N Z VI :: ~ LL s~ i 4E'~ ~Nq ~ rt a ,30 ~~„$ a ~ ~ -°CF 3gs" ° ~~ ~ w3 NerugEiin"-"~dEc vcg¢ g~ 88u~xE wg}g~~'~U ~~'` d ~_ ;n°d~t~~~8~u°as¢n°b~~iu~y~a~=w~i6~ua~u3I=I8~~~dcYB~a.ia a"m ~ off ~~ ~` 3a ~ r o .. eR ~3d ,~ 8888 88P.~9A 9P.8 58 888 8S 9888$88 85388 ~A 88 aN ~^ P OO O Y f Y P 0000000 NY001~~'10NO NOONp00 N ry v0 ~ O ~ ~~p`I O ~m ?d ,$j_ ~NNSi8 88$83A8 m88 958888 08 888. Y5~$ 8oooRg~'' oo N Oc 1~ 000 O p N 5; 9 53 8 ~~ ~ ~ e ~ _ ° ~8 mg ~ 88588 888888 888 8888SS 88 8888888 888858 58,8 N _ oocoo 000000 000 000000 n$ 0000060 oocoo0 0o a S 8 S 8 8 S 8 8 0 0 Nw ~d p N~SSYi 88598 SS8 S$8S$~ 98 ~885$8S 88888. 88 $ Y{ A e S 53 ~" 9 8 N - N - ffi a 5 a a a a 3 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 0 d w ; w E ~~ Q 3 ~ a 5 F O ~ d w v_ ~ •- LL 8~ ° - ,~ w y ~ (9i i zu 8 ~ ~^ ~n S9'go ~~n w r-.n d'c -"? SjFg g"33 ~Zay yEy iE ~5q5yy=~s Gov q m ~ 8 h~~c4 ~'fugBn ~iLLaoQUU~~.'~u i3b~~a ~LL3F3d~~~Qt~~~LL~a am' p d -E FF 5 ;n a i~ E > z 0 ~ aF 2 ~~ of ~ 00000 OCO a000 OOC CC ° O Nn 00°0000 000009 O0 O ~Y oaooo 0 0000 oco 00 ~m 0000000 oooooc ~ 0 0 0 0 ° o 0 0 8 0 0 0 - ~~ 3 e o .-o°o .. 0000 00 ~ooormo aoo° o0 ~~ n~o-o no~0 m' -oaooo o° nooo-md ooooon o0 8 '- o a o v n v o - m o ~8 '.d $ mrv~.im °o~o°o~ -o° ~mrvooo Nv v~°o'e w'Oa°o °°°ooo c° w a a m o . N ~ d 0 pp~~@ rg q avN nmN - vo~a o0m m° ooomo ooooma 0o c T5- ' ~r00- 000~~0 00~ 000000 NO O~i000-O 00000 °O S NN C N N N N n C -S ~d p Nn-nN oNmmoa moo NNOOOO o mooom v,o ooo°m~ oa am of ~nNNm aoo-oo +oc 000000 °~i° .aooooo ooo°a oo g C ry o d o 0 „ n o o N N n c ~~ ~~ 0000 occooo ooo 00mooo 00 ooo°ouo 000000 oc c .~ ao°oo oooaoo oco 0orooo 00 00°00$0 ooaooo 0o q0 _ n m o 0 o m a o n ~ o r o $ a o a a a a a a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .- r o ~~ a iy n' R ~~ _ U_ y ' ~ y f ~d Q~ ~3~ v a` F 8?.~ w 5gY ~ is ~ ~8 ~ ~s a~i a`h~~a w z;~,8 `,, .. 'n .5~~`~D~s P$ ~3"' ¢am'~R ~=_ z~ 8 ww "t'~ o^e~~E~_,~ c°~E cue ~` BE~G~~ggwg~gg "g .%o5: ~ m ~ ~n°~i~is ~ugua r.~8.og~~tiC~a~~?~s ~c~d'~LL32~6~8~2~$B~LLfN<m ~ ot~ ~~ z 3n d ~~ ~ > o 2~ ~d p or,ooo oooaPO ooa 000000 onoooao 000000 ao Co, td on4oo oaooo 000000 N goPOOO 000006 00 8 N N q p a ^ o O O m q O O ^mg Wp ~ ~N OfIO O~-ONn ONO P 00 q0 Y1 ~lOOOaO OOOO~N 00, ~^ 00 S ~O 000 O.NO OOG M10 ~qpd Y~00 OOOO~q 06 ~ P ~~ 4 nN00 NOS-q00 pO0a0 OC pOONO O~nOOnO ~N tyi NNOry O 00 X00 On000q PO NV'OOONO p00 Oo a~ N O n N b O ~ O O g $g q o0 ooooaP o 000000 0 0000000 oo4aoo Oo.P 2 ~Tf 00000 oo0aao oap 000000 08 oo60d0o 606600 oo ~,g 0 0 0 0 0 0 C oo 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 aN a~ ~ NNONO NONNOO X000 On00001 06 N~0660NC On0000 00 8 O n N a O ~ O OOY 00000 NNO 000000 00 1000000 0004000 00 T v~ ooo0m aooopn Nr-o ooppoo od ~noo0p0 00000 00 8 Nq ry ^ O O 7 n O O ~ O O a a a a ~ ~ a a ~ .° .- ~ .c a ~ ~ a - ~ LL ~ ~ L m w ~d ~ ~ f gg 9 ~ ~E ~ ~ a ~ ~~ ~, U m Q _$~ ^m v E~ U "Aw w c3 c ~8. g ~52 z' ~a v~4~ "E .~ py q~yygg 3 E.gE z Zq~ A wk"'-cBsgN~ E"VN~ v~E ~^9m3g~~yb Gi~C wTIA `~ "u *~`- 8 a ~E i~ '' ~°ad~U3i~gc~a$isa°~UCi~6~~~LL~~~e~c~a~LL3F76r~oa3~~~~,a:; _ ~ ov ~~ ~ 3 " mm ~'~ yl nmppo oO~mmv .o pOmopo 00 onpPmo pmooe. ooo vin ooo oomNOVi abo d po 66 bo N.-o m6ood o ~ A - _ - m o 0 N .~ n N O ~ N O vNn~ nMnp 00 NOOp00 00 On000mP OOOOPN O C' Od NOY)m0 OOOMOO -~00 N00000 NO 6V00-NO OOOOON O '.O Nm N O m O N O, O a - N N q M O Ca° rog ~ ooooa 000000 ooc 000000 ~~ aooooo0 oaoooo 0o g p p o 0 o g o 0 0 NOOfi aJ ~ -OOON OOONOO 000 Ov000N NO t'IN OOOOb Od00~-O 00 O W -~~OOn OOOn00 000 0-000P no n..00~'OOO ~V=0010 00 S N ~^f ~ - O N O~ N n O - n ~ + O 'A T ?_I '~ A 7 r7 F Y 1- F r M F N 1- 5 O C LL ~_ N ~ i N ~8 0 ~ m a ~ ~~ w ~3 w s~ °i d sB~ ~ E ~~ g ~~G~ w d ~ ~ cgs `a od '~ $r ~' ~W~'cg£~~N Afi'i$Eo~`^~n`o~~~~~y~9~'°d =o-88°S~Su6Pd°b°~u~~3 ~ o- p 'ma`y ~ v~°~ fci gc~axLLo-bg~~uo~a~~°z°3f ~~n ~~.3~I6~ ~ u xu.faam o o~ r r g 3 m51 ,g S $8888 888888 888 88888$ $$ 8$88888. 888888 88 8 ao m 00000 000000 aoa 000 00 oodoooo oRoo60 ao 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 o m ~ o e+ ',g 8 8'888 8885188 888 888888 88 R888S88 888888 88' No i o 0 o ao n o 000 000000 0 06000 0_0060 ooY ~ A 8 8 8 8 8 8 m n 0 0 0 o a N Qo I,g ~ ~88~8 8851~~6 K88 :88888 88 88888 8 8888851 88~ NRON1- ONNON~ 000 N^0000 00 O~m000O O 60u1f o0 h N 0 ^ ~ 51 ~ ~; m 8 ~ Si a ~ ~ e~ &d b X8888 51$88851 888 888888 88 8888888 858888 88 NP ~ ndooo mooooa 000 00 000 00 oRoooao o o 0o m 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 N o 0 0 ~ o 0 QR mg ~ 551888 888$8 888 588888 88 8"888$.8 888888 88 am o~vo oa ooooo_ oao 000000 00 oEdaaod oooa6o 00 ~ 51 8 8 8 $ 8 N _ o o m ~ o 0 ~R ^$ ~ 88888 88888$ 888 88~885i ~8 8888888 858888 88 8 ~ ooooo 000000 000 oo~oom mo omooada oooooa oo'~ 8 $ $ 8 8 S 0 o m m o 2 r r „ - ~ ~ H r ti `a a 0 ~_ n" LL J N 5 n ~ A > ~ 3 v~ ~ w u' ~ ~ o ~ a w ?~ w ~ g8 8 ~~°~°~m ~ug ~'~'~ m~s~3~g3E@a 5g~ ggaa~~gS aot ~ cF gS ~ }$~3i~c3"~n°sLLa6au°~B~a~LL£`38~~a'~~3~3a~bo~38£gNxm' o e%3 ~Q 8 88888 885885? 888 888888 88 8888SSi8 888588 88 ~m m o00 0 0 0 000 ooooao 00 00006~o aooooo 0o n `a c 0 d 3 :~ O 0 8 5i ,. 8 8 o 8. o A rv~ 8 o 8 '+ a ~ ~ a a a -n ,- ~ .- ~ .- 9 N N S m a Z~ Z J s ~ JA j 6 ~ C N 9 y w R V v ~ ~ O 6%CCC _m Q d -8~ c e ~ v~ E 8 ~j w a# ~ scs 3 ~€ y ~Q~~ og8g Nag Ns~a~'~yy3~ $ $ it pQ,eg~R ~_ Qty ~~ _~ v~a 3c4 Qi c~~~a$LLa~~uu°Ob~a'~~°i35 ~i~~~~3FSd ~6~~t$b ~'~~.in .~ ~ 3 ~ Q"R ~~.g 9 00000 000000 cao o°coo°p oa Poooo o'o o,O pOOp po c a°' b pp p pgpPpp g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 c QT (1 ~ ~OpO O Yt00 O 0 0000000 OO 000000 000000 00 2 00 OOOMOO 00 0 000 00 000000 0000000 00 ~~ I M ~ O O O (~ Y O O O r O O ~~ ~2 .D NOPN bbO~v OO NpOOG 0O 000COr100 p00bv p0 ¢¢ R ~ 04~00N ~b('1 v00 ON0000 O~0000~ OOOO~ut 00 '~ ary '' O N O N Oi ~ p t~ O b 0 0 O MOOpO vOOO0 O1 OGO OOb00p0 00 Ob000000 000000 @'~. $?~ p' onab Npooory ppp oo-0 0 op dmopo 0 odoooo o°cg ~O1 ~ R n e o _ o m o 0 -T ~] ~p ~ O~Op00 OCp00n 00 pp op0000 O0 ^p00000 Op00pp O0 RR rlppO 00000 00 pOOCG pp 0p 0 pp0000 a °' p O p p p p a ~ p p ~~ ^8 ~ 00000 000000 000 pa~oSa Np omooaoo °%0000 0o g p P 0 0 O O O O ~ 0 m O O a a ~ a a a a _a a _ o ~ O O d M µ N _U J _ a ~ Yy ; w gS e 3 -yy ~ s ¢¢ o ~ ?~ ~~ P J BM c qv [ , '"~o ahi w 3 b ¢ ~q sp a i ~j ~° ~° ~ 5 P FNC 2. ~ ,nom Cu9 EaS O~~ 33~ ~O ~i OhC ;$„_ ~ g~ ~ Fwr § a ruo€'Yy .=Z ~c g~ ~i yy%%~°~a .~~iffw ~~¢¢E %vE= ~ oti ~~ ~ ~~~cg ~3~~c4axLLa57~uc~a..:~3~~~n`t~LL 3V=7d °~JQdtg~l~u'3N a"r'~ Y Q"~ ~'¢ ~ oooaa oooao~ 000 000000 oe oe o0oaono 0oooae 0 0 000 oooeomo 000000 as 8 Nm 0 e ~ AI 00 O O O O O m O i i_ ~ ~_ i 'q -~ ',~ F ti ti .. ~ 1°- 1- F F O d iS ° 3 ~ _ ~ 8 ~ 9~ ~ o $~' 3 W~9'PO ~F2A r-,..Y+ "'3s,~v3~€'~ ob°~y"gas°gS ~-O_ ~ae £~ y ~n~,3s~8gSa°LLa~a,,;~a~LLgii~ua~~;c~a"SJ~3u£~~wgm x o ~: : ~ x SCS ENGINEERS - CITY OF MONTCLAIIt hn mS; _LL - Si ~'8~~ S8R8R8 8A8 8."8888 88 X888888 8888.8.8 88 8 N NOi ~1~NOp -~h _p 000 Ov0000O00 Nv{OOO~n 00000000000 y0j f v O N O, O m8 '~ ~ ~8~A88 8.R X888 8a8 8.4'851851 88 8880888 888885{ 88 f Nv-n OvNmmOp° 0 NONONp00000 000 OOOONC~O00 N O .C O O S1 O '. _ .~ O O - ~ ~ ~m ~' ~ ~8~88 8~~85;R e^p 8~~888 Sib 5i.88.851~8 8888„°~ R8 - ~°- oN - nonooo eo N -ro pooo m op 8 8 8 A 5a 8 ;~ g 8 - N o P am ai ~ 8R~8~C „R 88~~~ 888 NR88851 ~8 5;8888$8 88888 88 8 ' m Non ~oo..M1m - mrupoo~ ~ NaooviHO oodo~N o0 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 K' 8 o n - N r, n ,'~, ° ~rv "'~ ~ hAN88 NS;C~oo R88 ry8888 8R 888888 851888 88 00 000 ON N1~00000 CvNOOPI~ p0 8 8 ~' S2 8 p 8 Y N N N _ ~; a ~g nd PY niC n%o~ ooone 9'e h~S o"p grvoo 88 8N88888 S88$oo 88„ 8 q g ~ 8 e N m ° N _ a a ~ a a a . a a - - - o ~ w LL a ~ - m C~ N ~~ '1 > S ~ g~$$> °i o ~~~ F ~ a E~ c 8 i-4gq~¢ ~ ap ~ ~s Q E g g~ y ~w~~ yon Aw$EiiN~~:~~~c~-~'=m3U3a8~~~Xfi p~ya sg~g riU~= -°E ~+~ ~ ;°da ~~~~u at4a x~.a°b ~uu~_.2~LLz`25 ~r~i ~LL3c`i 6~bj~~5~g2'~am p 1 of ~r z i"- 'd m ~888fC 888'A8~ RA8 8°8888 88 85;88888 88858 8fl 8 I~m - rPv~rv.- ooomn_ crvaoory oo woo~vo oaooum no a 0 v v _K g u Y3 8 8 8 R 8 la 8 ~°. "d °8888 85888 888 888588. 88 851888$8 888888 8S " am _ mnm~io oo_ndn noa onoooN oo mN Oaorvo om,~co oo oa 8 ~" 4 8 51 8 8 .~ a .. ° R ~ ° x ~ - A a a a '°- ~ ~°- ~ a_ ~ ~ i m ~ _ u 7 C c .. 3 Yj s N y~ F m W U ~ ~ !EQ 6 F rR S N _~_ ~ d ~~ c a c E _ ,'~ F~ W ~ ~ C$ a 8 E a NC ~ `~ ~ N °d p p Q 3 a ~ ~Q ~~ r~Y2 W ?iu~~'= .,es'_v vy34 ma „" yfa~gg ~g~$ a g g 9 "~~u°~IU gcii ~S ~a°03u;?~~r~~Z;`5~an~b3L 6 mCl~d"35$~7a im'" ~ o~ ~~~`' i 3a d ~~ ~ o N .. @~ -d 0 Nmry oo-^-o ono oNOOOO eo ooowo ooeoooo 00.0 m Onm oo- o+o Moaoo o nooomo co66o 0 3 am ~ ~ - 4 ~ .., o N o 0 °im ~d o No 000 o°onow co om OOe 00 oaoomo ao _ ~ - _.-nw mmeo4 00 0000 'd _N oo ~ N O J1 O w O O O O ~~ ~ 00- n0p O O v0000 NM_ aMm i moo oo-Non _rv _,n MOOO no woo 'M Nn oooo~- 00 o c m ~~ ~m q nm~oN noaoaN oNO ooooan rvo NOOO m,mo ooooNm o0 ?S wN~o NOO O N_OOOV n0 m000~v0 OOOOpOi 00 $ ~ P O i(1 n T O qVf 1r1 ~, (j nN~vO NOM- O _00 _ 0000 000 O,N 00000 i000nN 00 ~`! v~ NOwN O~OOOO -1'I000pO n00(~I (~1 00 .l Y _ tl~ O O ~T _ v N O -8 Md q mm m~noN_vou~mm Ica 4 oN oo ~-O Oamo oooo4n o ~m M _m N~n~ mo 6~r+nn NOO aoorvoo 00 oHaooao oooomo oa q M N N n N O _ 0 4 N N w a a ~ a a a a _ _ _ _ _ _ O 1= Y F r r 1- 1= ~- O LL o U A ~ 3 ~ ~¢ 9; v i i O a ~ w 9~ '~ a-m_ $' d -8~ ~V(" o rs ~ ~gpaEgqw~gqw $m°~ ;;agg E ~~ 8 F'u3 ~`'^££~u$F. ~' vy;. .'Zg~~ ~2 ~~"5~~ w~,Fg"g"%_~3' _~ SE ~~ `a°~~~~~c~4c7aiLLa ~~], u~_y~~-,: z3~~Ma~ 3FEdr~o at~S ~.~Fna-~ s o~ ~ ~ ;a $ Cm '~ OOnfJ DP 000 00 ~OOWF,O 000'0 ~O 00 P n 00PN OOOmNm mnP O_OOOOr OD n~COn.~O OpOOONm 00 O N O m N O O O 0 0 _Y 3 f Qa ^LL O mv~90 OOOiP04 vOP 0000 OO iyn000n10 Op00pp OO O OO ~~'Oi000N 00 ~AGOO _C OROOOO 00 y^~ a a a ~ ~ a e ~ ~ ~ .- ~ ~ ~ T P N V ?~ ~ 3 a m ? w and ~ w ~ v a i ^~w ° ~ a w ~'i ~n _$~ 4 g ~_5 ~ w a cy adrE it wpw,5y'~~~_ Ei'c ~n3 'c ='s~2 Z~o W a ~ %U $= ~i x ¢a ZIJS~~~U62o.-iuS`~U°-~.l.-: z~~QU~'a0u. ~.Ff ~ti On~I)O~g~6 as Q F~ F F Z ~ - 22Y N ~ ~8 Nd ~ 88$0$ 888,nN~ 888 8e8888 88 08888$$ 888888 88~, R 8 ° 8 8 8 8 r m o " a m m o '8 "~ R 88~R 851 885~~88 888 888888 88. $888.8518 8888.$51 58 ~, am rv m _ ooNmmB moo mroodo 0o rvooomao 0 0 or oo N 8 H R R 8 8 8 8 a8 "~i ~ ~R 81~~ 88°~'o 888 888 8.8 5{8 88888$5. 888880 88 8 h~NV~pnN OP N~O r)00 ~ N40 Ov OO g N R 53 SI 8 u1 P !~ N O m8 '~ ~ 8~A 8518 888518$ R88 8851858 88. 8888808 888.8.8$ 88.',8 co 8 m 800 o m o m_ 8 8 R R 8 A 8 8 n N _ ~ °' ~'. Nd ~, 8o 1C 8'.4'8 888080 888 888888 88 8.88888.8 88888$ 88 57 8 S 8 8 8 8 S o a o v o 0 ~m P~ ~ ~^iC.~8 88508 R88 w8ne8$ 88 8888888 8888nn 88 8 8 5 8 8 5 8 o a ~ e m q N n ry ry a -~ ~ a_ a a a a a o r r ~ r r o ~°- ~= r° d ~ 3 ~ '^ 'N3 w i - ~ ~ A i ~ ~ ~q a 3 n ~ ~ g ~~ ~ ;y w w ~ 3 g ~~ t~3 ~ g~ s ~~~3 ~'i c4 guo°z u~a°s~pu~La ~`~g ~8~~~~~3~~~~~o235igi~2m i o~ r~ ~ 3a e8 ~"'d ~ A888fl 888888 "88 °tC~888 88 8888888 888880 08 ~ooN boo NOOO wo ~~r,~ooce0 0 _ rvm N .. .._N~ Nv ~~ 8 8 8 R 8 8 m m ~ n n 6 0 ~~ -d R 88888 ~88A8~ 888 888888 SS 888888 888.8.88 88 8 N N ^Rooo Noo_N oao o000D0 oa ~ o0 00 -a o0 0 R R 8 S 8 8 A 8 m o o a r - o TR ',d e 8 888 888881 888 588888 88 8888858 888858 S8 S 0 N 00 OOOOON 000 000000 CO m00000 000000 Oo 8 S 8 5i 8 8 a a o N a a a8 ',d 8 83888 8888 8 888 888888 88 88888.88. 888888 88, o000 0o m aoo 000000 0 00000 000odd o0 ? ~ 0~ $ 8 8 8 Si 8 8 0 0 0 ~ e o ^~ N8~88si 888885 888 888888 88. 8885$88. 888888 88 °eo`r~~@ mN~oo 000 o0no06 00 ~ o a 000000 0o y 8 S S 8 8 8 8 R ~. o n a ~ o 0 a'8 Nd ~ 88R~~ 888888 888 888888 RS 53888888 888888 88 T~PNF ONNO~N~N 000 f'ry000 N O 00 OOOONO 00 _ R 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a a ~ '-° e o ° a a x 3 ~ a a a a a ~ n" N N _ i `L ~ ~ i Ana °5'~ m u N ~ it2' 3 ~" E'~d: vg3~~a y 6 s wa ~ A ~~j _ v ~ g5 ~ `~d$~8i~8~c~Ca,$'~a55u"ubwa~LL~~6~ua~~3HFar8~~u~i ~E n2~ _ z o~ .-~ ~ 36 u z a o e~ "d ° ~~445i 888$4 S°8 4"8888 C8 8.8888535 8.5388538 88 an - o +N OOOn00 ONO YN0000 ~V OO ~~OOONO OvNOO ~~O Op s x M1 53 a s n t0 N v N ~ O i4 '"d -° ~K'8~8 8SN~R88 888 848888 88 $Q88888 8538888 88 4 a0 mmomo ooonop aao 6vooao NNOO mho 000000 00' K' $ ,4 $ 8 51 5 m n o o n v o ~'~ "d § 585351$ 8$53485 488 85310888 851 R~5188s~8 888888. 88 ~ 8 a~ OO NnO OONNON OO p01000 Oe m~OONO OOGONO Oo ~ry 8 8 4 K' S3 8 8 H _ " p N O e:o "d ~ 8588 8810"88 888 08888$ 88 88588518 8888.88 88.N ~ 8 8 R 8 53 8 8 ;, _ n p ~ o ~m "d m "458 8884853 888 R8888~ 88 SY5,888$$ $81808$4 $pB,Y 4 Si 8 8 t0 4 8 " n o N o e m o ~ 8 ~_ _3 Z a A W Z O F r '- ti .. ~ F a O ~ d ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ - o d ° 3 A `o ° ~ ~ ~ In P ~ w c4 n x o ga w $x a Sm ; ~ 08~ gNR r $u nE d~ 'fig °¢ ~ y 3-s~Rg 30$ 5 8 ws 3' a F w Ng~g s'~y~g 3 ~'a g ~~e 8 ~ r :~ ~y ° ~°wa~3~'~u5c4a$~us5u~bwaH~°£3~~~a'~~3~3a~~~~~~g~~k'2~ aF- rr ~ 3a a u r r O N '8 Nu iH oov`° O° N o00 ooonoo 0o v0 o0 ooomo 000 ~~ ^ m 9dP N o0 000o do o~oaomo oo~0 0 ~ N 9 ^ a ry n o ~$ N~ $ ^ooo o0:oa~ 09 000090 000 oo0mmo 090000 99 o O°°'^^v ^00 mn00oo 0 0 ~00 mn0 006009 0o g ~ o 0 g N m - d n o d~ ryd .9( nrmmnm -o-aarv oNO avooo°. ° mm0oo~o ooo m.- o - T N 00 m0000O-0 OO OOO VIry 00 g ry ^ N O O N - rp O ~' 'gym SI -On0 0000 Or1 '00 0000 O op OOOOOVO 9000x0 Co M^I •• ^ ^ 00 OOOnj OOGOO O 00 g r~i ry m O : O ^ N O ^m N~ 000^10 OC OOm04 0000 000000 p0 000090 000000 c0 ao ~ omom9 00 0a o 9 '00 0 ory99oo6 _ 090 0 ~ ~ ~ o ° m 0 J ~~jj ° 0 ry o 0 ~Oi muw. ~i mry~ry0 OON-00 n00 00000 00 ONO~OmOO 0000^N 00 p ~Y ~ ° ^ ~ s O O C 6 7 p ` r r ` 1= ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~- a z ~ ~ ~ ~ N d _ w ~ u `d O 5 $'_ 4~ -~m ' .. c E "~ $~-~r w d d r Sii N N Y) g ~f~ A wy-~9'ia ~uA w r ~JA v~s'S ~~a~Ea Tjo 3 'v~E 3 e 5 gpN~gLL 4 ~ b ~g ¢ggp~ ~s o-g FF ~ `2°~~c332~8~3n~~ab~uc3b~a~°g 3`i ~.~`~~~~;F~3~~~23Sf gY kU'am ~ 3 a 0 .n moomco Noo mmmo0o mo mooo-.o oo 00x00 00 LL aOC ~ 00 Nm000 00~ as N O i~ ~d ~ r000 NP c QOO Q00000 00 ON,00000 OOOOOO 000 N^ a 00 00 00000 00 0 00000 ~Ci D O C R P O O O N O O mF ~~ o omooo 0000°0~ 000 000000 00 oNOOOOO oooaoo 00 > m m o 00omo 00 0mo00o0 00 000 8 N o $ n o 0 o m o 0 P~ d ~ 0N00 o0 00omma 0000 000000 00 00000000 000000 00. ~LL r 0P _ 00 00000 0 dR0000 00000m g 0 0 a Q o 0 o R m m '"'d 0u°c_ moo 000 00`-'00°0 oa a°o 0o°000 o°o'OO°oo°o 0°0 8 P R o - o a o 0 T~ NJ ~ NOf~O ONNraN 000 NNa000 NO ON00000 OOOONN OOiO W ^vin ri oonrnv+ 000 nnuiood Pd roidddd0 o0o0ae oo~g O N O p O O O n N QT 'A 9_ ~. A A_ ~-E O ~ H r ~- '= r r r D r M pO N ~ tU7 ~ S .. ~ ~g ; ¢ . 9; w a gd_ rn u ABM a ~ EC ? Ba ~'q w ~y ~q ~ ~s g `-p8 } ~W 9'ia~un w i_N~c_mm "y~~so3Ef ~dy vi 'tl Qa-°o g~g8 ~gY~° z g~ 8 u~i$f3i~3~u~$~a~`~c';u bwdtiLLg3S~ui~LL 3~=f G~~~~tg6~~Eaam a ~ olE ~~ ~ 3a O ~ r O N c~ N~ o "n avi oop pN oao o O o bo oooop oNOomo 00 _ voo p0 0 0o n _no'O o dv oN oa~~ o b ~~ ~d _ rvo po_ o0 000 0 o po a Nboowoo oooco op 0 rnbaoo ooom o 00 -oaoo nmooNOd dOOa oo ~ ab - P o ~~ Nd ~ ooowo oo~oom voo oomooa on w~HOOVo 000000 oa $ n ~. e b o 0 N ~Q ObNNO pONt~l00 00 00000- O OOOOOWO 0000 QH m 'ilJ ONN00 OOb~pO 000 OOOOOm 00 00000 - 00'0000 Oo [a M~ - ~ O O O O ~] ICJ OIO OOOOOV 000 CIOOO PI'1 00 ON00000 OOOOOP OO ab W pNj - --O 00000- 000 .-O OO - 00 000000 O'000~ 00 A N O ~I ~+ - O - O - O a a_ a a a a ~ a_ a a o : ~ r° iF _ ~ ~ ~ 2 o ~ ~ o gQ o ~ n > ~ a ~~ ~ ~~_ m ~~~ A c E ~ 8~y~(~~ ~ ~ $ ~ $ a~E 8 3 `d u °i ~Si~ s ~~ y' ~c~i EQ~ $ ~o°y 3-o.'~s }' ;o g g~ R ww "s `~qij°p'Fp~p~aE„dN8 ~,~E~3Yu93t5~z'8~o~~p w<'y S~'g g~g. ~ 2 ~_ ~°d~(g22U4U6 o2LL U°bgUVbw d~=LLi37~~ap w°3Fi6'=~~2(g J~WZ2¢m ~ x E ~? a sK 'J E > z O b ai= rr ~ 3 SCS ENGINEERS - APPENDIX C WASTE DIVIItSION SURVEY FORM x WASTE SURVEY FORM Business name: _ Address; _. Telephone: _ Responsible individual: 1) Do you currently produce any waste which is, to your knowledge, sold to a broker for eventual recycling? _yes _no 2) Can you describe this waste for us? (Please choose waste categories and types from the enclosed llst) Category Type Amount/month considerable moderate insignificant 3) Can you describe waste produced by you which you do 9,qj believe is recycled? Category Type Amount/month 4) Comments? SCS ENGINEERS - FINAL F.EPORT AB 939 SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT 4ND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE l~.IIVTFN'I' THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ftepared for: The City of Rancho Cucamonga N Conjunction with the west San Bernardino Couary coalition Prepared by: SCS Bagineers 3711 Loog Beach Boulevard, Ninth Ploor Long Beach, California 90807 (310) 426-9544 December 1991 File No. 190191 SCS ENGwfENS - CONT&VTS Section Paee Executive Summary ................................. FS-1 Introduction ............................. .. FS-i Results of the Waste Characterization Study ......... ......... FS-2 The Planning Process ....................... ......... ES-3 Plan Recommendations ...................... ......... ES-3 introduction ....................................... l-1 Pufpose of Study ................................... 1-t Stmcmre of RepoR .................................. I-2 Plan Development Process .............................. I-2 Summary of Objectives ................................ L-3 2 Solid Waste Generation Analysis .......................... 2-I Introduction ....................................... 2-I Summary of Solid Waste Generation Smdy .................... 2-2 Materials Targeted for Diversion .......................... 2-3 3 Source Reduction Component .................. .......... 3-l Intmduction ............................. .......... 3-I Objectives .............................. .......... 3-2 Existing Condifions ........................ .......... 3-4 Description of Source Reduction Alternatives ........ .......... 3-a Evaluation of Source Reduction Alternatives ......... ......... 3-U Summary of Funding Required ................. ......... 3-a7 Selection of Programs ...................... ......... 3-ag Forecast Diversion ........................ ......... 3-52 Pmgtam Implementation ..................... ......... 3-52 Monitoring and Evaluation .................... ......... 3-55 4 Recycling Component ....................... .......... 4-I Goals and Objectives .......... ........... .......... 4-1 Existing Conditions ............... . .................. a-2 Conclusions ....................................... a-3 CONTENTS (continued) Section Paee 1 Evaluation of Alternatives ....................... ....... 1-5 Selection of Recycling Programs .................... ...... 1-36 Progruns Not Selected ......................... ...... 1-10 Cumulative Integrated Effect of the Programs ........... ...... 4-40 Program Implementation ........................ ...... 1-12 Monitoring and Evaluation ....................... ...... 1-42 S Composting Component ........................ ....... 5-1 Objectives ................................. ....... 5-. Existing Conditions ........................... ....... 5-3 Description of Alternatives ...................... ....... 5-3 Evaluation of Alteritatives ....................... ....... 5-8 Selected Alternatives .......................... ...... 5-21 Program Lnplementation ........................ ...... 5 24 Monitoring and Evaluation ....................... ...... 5-24 6 Special Wastes Compocent ...................... ....... 6-I Objectives ................................. ....... 6-l Existing Conditions ........................... ....... 5-I Description of Alternatives ...................... ....... 6-5 Evaluation of Alternatives ....................... ....... 6-7 Selected Alternatives .......................... ...... 6-I1 Program Implementation ........................ ...... 6-11 Monitoring and Evaluation ....................... ...... 6-12 7 Education and PubGe Information Component ........... ....... 7-I Goals and Objectives .......................... ....... 7-t Existing Condidons ........................... ....... 7-2 Program Selection ............................ ....... 7-4 Program Alternatives .......................... ....... 7-4 Selected Alternatives .......................... ....... 7-7 Monitoring and Evaluation ....................... ....... 7-7 Summary of Education/Public Information Component ..... ...... 7-11 iC5 ENGINEERS - .c ~r CONTENTS fcontinuedl Section SCS ENGINEERS - Paee 8 Disposal Facility Capacity Component ............. . ...... 8-1 lntroduction ....................................... 8-1 Existing Permitted Solid Waste Facili[ies .............. . ...... 8-1 Additional Disposal Capacity Needs Projection ................. 8-2 9 Funding Component ..................... ............. 9-1 Introduction .......................... ............. 9-1 Objectives ........................... ............. 9-1 Existing Conditions ..................... ............. 9-2 Costs .............................. .............9-2 Funding Sources ....................... ............. 9-3 Contingency Sources of Funding ............. ............. 9-5 10 Plan Integration Component ................ ............ 10-1 Introduction ...................................... IO-I Achievement of AB 939 INversion Targets ....... ~............ IO-l Appendix A -Comments and Responses to the Preliminary Draft SCS ENGINEERS - rABLEs tiuni Faee 2-f Total Waste Quantities Generated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ................................. ' ..... 22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Existing Waste Diversion Listed by Source and Type ............................. ..... 2-8 2-3 Average Self-Haul Waste Composition for the Participating Jurisdictions .. . ................. . ............ to ... . 3-I Selected Program Summary ........................ ..... 3-57 3-2 Selection and Implementation of programs .............. ..... 3-SS 3-3 Implemenadon Schedule for Existing Alternatives Evaluation ............... . ........ . .......... ..... 3-59 3-4 Implementation Schedule for Quantity-Based Variable Rates for Commercial/Industrial Businesses .............. ..... 3-60 3-5 implementation of Loans, Loan Guarantees, Grants, attd Contributions Programs .......................... , 3-61 ... . 3-6 Implementation of Waste Evaluadons/Waste M'rrimivntion ....3.62 programs .................................. .. 3-7 Lnplementation of Backyard Composting Programs .......... ..... 3-63 3-8 Implementation Schedule for an Awards Program ... • . ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ • • • • 3"~ 3-9 Implementation Schedule for Nonprocurement , 3-65 Source Reduction ............................. .... . 3-10 Implementation Schedule for Supplementing Government 3-66 Procurement Policies .............................. . TABLES (Continued) iCi iNGWEERS- 3-11 Implementation Schedule for a Land Use and Development Program .................................... .....3-6', 3-l Short- and Medium-Tenn Recycling Goals ............... ..... ~t-18 1-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Existing Waste Diversion Listed by Source and Type ............................. ..... 3-a9 4-3 Short-Tenn Projected Diversion for Residential Recycling .......................... ....1-50 J-3 hiarke[s for Recyclable Materials .................... ..... d-5 ~-5 Short-Term Projected Diversion for Multifamuy Recycling ................................... .....1-52 4-6 Short-Term Projected Diversion for Commercial/industrial Recycling ................................... .....4-53 4-7 Short-Term Projected Diversion for Buy-Back Centers ........ ..... 3-51 d-8 Projected Diversion For the Short-Term Planning Period - AllPrograms ................................. .....4-55 d-9 Recycling Pmgtam Diversion Estimates (Percent of Total Waste Generated) .............................. ..... 4-56 4-10 Implementation Schedule for Curbside Recycling Program ................................ ... ......4-57 4-1 l Implementation Schedule for Multifamily Recycling ......... ..... 4-58 4-12 Implementatloo Schedule for aCommercial/Industrial Recycling Program ............................. ..... d-59 A-13 Implementation Schedule for Office/Institutional Recycling .................................. ......3-60 3-I4 Implementatoo Schedule for aBuy-Back Center ........... ..... 5-61 J-l5 Implemen[atloo Schedule for Recycling of Construc[ioN Demolition Debris ................................... J-62 TABLES (Continued) Sf5 ENGINEERS - i0-5 Master Implementation Schedule -Fiscal Yeaz 1993- 1994 ...................................... 10-13 10-6 Master Implementation Schedule -Fiscal Yeaz 1994-1995 ............ ~ .......................... IO-14 10-7 Master Implementation Schedule -Fiscal Year 1995 -1996 ...................................... 10-15 T~. TABLES (Continued) ENGINEERS - 1-16 Implementation Schedule for Recycling Programs .......... ...... 4-63 1- l7 Implementation Schedule for Regional Materials Recoe~ery Facility ............................. ...... J-61 5-1 Waste Diversion Estimates for Composting Programs ....... ...... 5-27 5-2 Estimated Costs of Implementation of a Local Composting Facility ................................... ......5-'_8 5-3 Costs Assoctated with a Regional Composting Site ......... ...... 5-29 5-4 Summary of Program Costs ....................... ...... SJO 5-5 Composting Implementation -Residential Yazd Wazte Collection .............................. ...... 5-31 S-6 Composting Implementation -Facility Impkmenta6cn (With Dtop-Off) .............................. ...... 5-32 6-1 Special Waste Implementation ...................... ...... 6-13 7-1 Implementation Schedule for PubGe Education ............. ..... 7-I2 8-1 Solid Waste Disposal Facility Needs Projxtion ............ ..... 8-4 9-1 Estimated Soute Reduction and Recycling Costs ........... ..... 9-6 9-2 Revenue Sources -Source Reduction and Recycling Costs ..................... ................ ...... 9-7 l0-t Waste Diversion ProjeMions for the City of Rancho Cucamonga ................................. ..... 10-3 10-2 Master Implementation Schedule -Fiscal Year 1990- 199 l ................................. ....... 10 - 8 IO-3 Master Implementation Schedule -Fiscal Year 1991-1992 ................................. ...... I 0-9 10-4 Master Implementation Schedule -Fiscal Year 1992-1993 ................................. ..... l0- l 1 x SCS FNGiNEE91 - FIGURES tiumber pave 5-1 Residential Waste Composition ............. ............. S-9 S : Commercial Waste Composition ............ ............. 5-10 S3 Industrial Waste Composition ............ . . ............. S-I t S-4 Crverall Waste Composition ............... ........ .... 5-12 :~ 56 FNGwEEgS - EXECLT[VE SL'~L1RY L\TRODL'CTIOY The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Draft Source Reduction and Recycling (SRR) Element was developed to meet the requirements of the Califomia Integrated Sotid Waste banagement Act of 1989 (AB 939), AB 1820, and subsequent related legislation and implementation guide- lines issued by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). In accordance with the legislation, the SRR Element proposes a series of soid waste prograrns to divert 2S percent of the solid waste generated from landfills by 1995 and 50 percent by the year 2000, The SRR Element was developed by staff in conjunction with a coalifion of five jurisdictions made up of the western unincorporated areas of the County of San Bernardino, and the cities of Upland, Chino, Rancho Cucamonga, and Montclair. These jurisdictions joined together to enhance the possibilities for regional cooperation and to share one waste characterization study. A separate SRR Element has been prepared for each area with specific input from appropriate local staff and fisrtehised haulers responsible for waste collection. The SRR Element is contained in two documents. Volume I includes the following sections: • Introduction. • Waste Generation Component. • Souu Reduction Component. • Recycling Component. • Composting Component. • Special wastes Component. i,C ES-I • Education and Public Information Component. • Disposal Facility Capacity Component. • Funding Component. • Plan Integration Component. SCS ENGINFEFS - Also included in this volume is the Household Hazardous Waste (1~') Element. As stipulated N AB 1820, the HHW Element is a serf-standing document which has been bound with the SRRE for ease of evaluation and distribution. Volume II includes the three inquired technical studies used to prepare the SRR Element: • Waste Disposal Characterization. • Waste Diversion Chamcterizaflon. • Waste Generation Projection, RESLZTS OF THE WASTE CHARpCTER.IZATION STUDY A9 939 requires the preparation of three waste generation studies: a characterization of the waste generated in Rancho Cucamonga which is disposed of in landfills, a characterization of waste currently diverted from Lmdfills, and 15-year forecasts of futon; waste generation. The waste disposal characterization is based on the results of a 2-wcek field survey at the Milliken Iandfdt conducted in January 1991. The waste diversion characterization is based on information from major waste generators and recyclers. The forecasts ate basal on estimated population and economic growth factors from the City's General Plan. The waste generation analysis for Rancho Cucamonga shows total existing waste generation at 148,080 tons per year. Of this total, 135,680 tons per year (9L6 percent' are currently landfilled. while 12,400 tons per year (8.4 percent' are currently diverted. Waste currently diverted counts toward the AH 939 diversion mandates of 25 percent by 1995 and 50 percent by 2000. Figures S-I through S-4 show the composition of residential wastes, commercial wastes, industrial wastes, and the overall composition of wastes generated in the City which n> ES-2 SCS ENGINFFNS - ate currently disposed in Lmdfills. These data ate the starting point for detennirting what types of diversion progtms are appropriate for the City. TfiE PLA.\`NI.'VG PROCESS The planning process and the format of this report follow the guidelines set forth m the CIWMB regulations. The process includes (1) assessment of existing conditions and programs; (2) ident~cation of a number of possible alternatives to accomphsh program objectives in source seduction, recycling, composting, or public education; (3) evaluation of each alternative using a Gst of criteria provided in the regulations; (4) selection of those alternatives that are appropriate to the jurisdiction's situation; (5) identification of the sources of funds to pay for all of the selected programs; and (6) development of an integrated plan that combines aU of the selected programs to meet the diversion goals. PLAIq RECOhIbIENDATIONS This plan outlines an integrated waste management strategy that, when implemented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, will mat the diversion requirements of AB 939. The major recommendations in the SRR Element art detailed below. Lnptementation of several of the programs recommended herein is subject to amendments of service contracts with the City's franchised haulers and the development of regional cooperation to facilitate the siting, constmction, and operation of material recovery facilities m process and market the my- clable or compostable material diverted from the waste stream. • Existing programs, including thrift shops, appliance repair stores, and diaper services, ate expelled to continue operations. 1'he City will support such activities and develop methods to quantify the waste diverted to these facilities. z~. ES-3 SCS ENGINEERS - • Implementation of quantity-based variable rates for wmmerciaUindustrial genem- tors Nthe medium-term planning period (1995-2000). • The City will seek grants and contributions ur the medium term to fund source reduction or other diversion programs or to fund loans or loan guarantees. • The City will encourage larger commeroiallindustrial generators to conduct waste evaluations, and will assist N identifying and implementing waste minimization techniques. This program will begin N the short-term plarrning period 0991- (995). • Ihrting the short-term Alarming period, the City will develop a technical assis- tance program to encourage backyard composting of yard waste and other organic wastes by homeowners. • The City will coordinate educational efforts that encourage waste minimization, and will act as a catalyst for implementing souttx [eduction programs. • The City will publicly recognize businesses and individuals for outstanding efforts in waste reduction to encourage others to follow then example. • The City will prnctice waste reduction N all departrtents to serve as a model for all private, public, and commercial genertors. • The City will supplement procurement policies to include concepts of twsability and reduced material content, begiruring in the short-term planning period. • Within existing land use policy, the City will invesGgale establishing incentives and disincentives to encourage solid waste reduction and diversion programs. x ES-4 RCCVCImQ .CS ENGINEERS - • By the end of 1992, the City mill extend the pilot residential curbside collection programs. The program will collect glass, metals, plastics and newspapers from all single family residents. • The City will phase m collection of recyclables from multifamily residents through the commerciaUindustrial recycling program. • The City will work with the franchised haulers to conduct waste audits of commercial industrial generators to develop strategies [o divert recyclable material. • The City will encourage continuation of existing drop-off centers. • State-sponsored buy-back centers will continue to operate, as will abuy-back center which is operated in conjunction with the material processing facility managed by one of the City's franchised haulers. • M institutionaUoffice recycling program exists az City Hall, and will be expand- ed m irtclude governmental agencies, schools, hospitals, and other instimrions. • Specific programs will be developed to encourage on-site separation of conswc- tion and demolition materials such as wood waste, concrete, and asphalt. • Present contracts assure that the City will have processing and marketing opera- tions for commingled residential recyclables (az least through the short-tens planning period) at an existing manual IvIIiF, which is operated by one of the City's authorized haulers. FS-5 SCS ENGINEERS - • The City anticipates working cooperatively with other nearby jurisdictions to design and implement a comprehensive mechanized materials recovery and processing facility. • The City will encourage the continuation of existing landfill salvaging at the Milliken Landfill. Co~sY~ng • The City will work with a regional coalition to site, permit, and construct a regional composting facility. • Curbside collection of green wazte for the residential sector will be implemented during the short-term phtnning period. • The City will encourage commercial, industrial, and self-haul generators to deliver source-separated green waste to a regional composting facility. SDgS12~µ'_;Ltt~ • The City will increase public education efforts, and will consider modifying collection procedures to ensure that white goods, bulky items, and tires are collected separately for diversion. M instnrctionaUinfomration brochure will be developed and distributed to all residents to cleazly explain how to participate in the Rancho Cucamonga residen- tial recycling program. FS-6 SCS ENGINEERS - • The City will work to establish a "Block Leader" support program for all recycling activities. Block leaders will be supplied with information on recycling programs, and will be encouraged to share this information with their neighbors. • In cooperation with the facility operators, tours will be arranged ro provide students the opportunity to visit the nearby Milliken Iandfdl and recycling processing facilities. • As audits of major waste generators are completed and individual waste reduction programs ate developed for businesses, the City will provide backup support in the form of information materials and suggested implementation plaits. • The City, in cooperation with the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce or other business organsations, will establish as amuat recycling recognition event, with special acknowledgements for major diversion efforts or other significant achievememts. • The City will show the progress and success of the various recycling and source reduction programs through various media. • The City will produce and transmit appropriate releases to all media throughout the Rancho Cucamonga area regarding the various aspects of the recycling and source reduction programs. • The City will take part m promoting recycling at community events, fairs, and other local aMivities where information will be offered to attendees. • The City will produce a video, or series of videos, to use in presentations to service clubs or civic organisations, or for on-air opportunities through local cable TV operations. r.' FS-7 Fuodin¢ ENGINEERS - The Ponding component presents the costs, and the revenues needed to offset the costs, for [he entire SRR Element. Waste collection service fees have been s[nremred so that the revenues generated are sufficient to cover program costs. In the case of insuffittent funding. several contingency sources of funding have been ident~ed in the funding component. To pay for the programs to be implemented in this plan, residential service fees will increase from 515.20 per month per household N 1990 to 522.26 per month per household in 1995. For commercial accounts, fees for the average account will increase from 581 N 1990 to 4103 in 1995, Plan Intention In this component of the SRR Element, all of the selected diversion and disposal strategies are drawn together into an integrated plan which meets the mandated goals of 25 percent and 50 percent diversion. Lnplemenation of the phm recommendations is projected to result in diversion of 25. t percent by 1995, and 53.9 percent 6y 2000. The Platr Integration compo- nent also contains an implementation xhedule which incorporates tasks from all components, identifies the entity responsible for implementation, and shows the start date and funding source for each task. .u FS-S c 0 .~ y O t ~ O.m ~ U 3 m °?5. h~ _~~ ~/ C ~ N V .~ N ~. t~ N~ A~ o~ ~~ x~ ~~~ n a ~" -N G ~ y U ap H ~ A ~ a d 4 E m N a a v N N m FS-9 d b Q U 6 N'C~ aN la ~Cj O ~~ Z~ C _O Y_ N O a-, Er o m N U .y ~ ~ 3 d ro~ o'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~~ E N E E 0 U v~ ad N lL a~ d~ Q (.l~ a CfO m ~ Q, o CO ~ N Z ~ ~-l~ N A y~3o N~V ~O N C7 N~ AdY .- m N U ~ y~ N m~ a a~ ti ~° N d O E A m N C O 9 d N N m ~ ~, m o N N ~ y a m m C7 > E C O ae ~, n ~ 0 .-. N Y ~ ~ ro U .3 a ~ i G) r a L `o T ~ _ ~ C '` C r 7 C ae O r d r O U aQ C '~ N N ~ N yj 0 N M G m `-' E a ~, m ~ m N a a ti o ~ z o v d ro m FS-I1 C O '« N~ O L a ~, ~ 'a~ O 3 UT ~~ y~ c m d E .. N O m m LL d~ 4 _U a ~ c m °1 ~ ~m z° A~ 3~ L ~- } v~ ~~ ~o m U aQ N ~ m of a N d Q E y r a m N A m '~-~2 Ao m~ ~v ~`n°. ,. ~ SCT FNGWFFRT - sECTIOV 1 L'vTRODtiCTION Pl,'RFOSE OF S'['[IDY This plan, the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga's Drag Source Reduction and Recycling (SRRI Element, was developed to meet the requirements of the California Integrated Solid Waste Management Act of 1969 (AB 439), AB 1820, subsequent legislation, and implementation guidelines for the preparation of SRR Elements issued by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). This SItR Element was developed with the participation of City officials and reflects the City's desire to take an active role in resolving solid waste matugement issues. Zn accor- dance with the legislation, the major objective of this plan is to adopt programs which will lead to the diveaioo of 25 petceat of solid waste from landfills by 1995 amt 50 percent by 2000. Detailed objectives ate outlined later in this introduction, it should be noted that the Elernent will uttdetgo extensive review prior to its foul adoption. This draft is being circulated for comments by the CIWMB, San Bemardiao County, the l.otal Task Force, neighboring jurisdictions, and intemsted groups and individuals in the community. After any suggested modifications to the Element have ban made, the docu- ment will be submitted for formal adoption 6y the Ciry Council piar to its transmittal to the CIWI~ID. AB 939 requires clot the CIPIMB receive SRR Elements by Ianuary 1, t992. 'C l-1 STRtiCT[,'RE OF REPORT :CS ENGINEERS - The Source Reduction and Recycling Element is comprised of two volumes. Volume I includes eight planning components, as follows: • Source Reduction. • Recycling. • Composting. • Special Wastes. • Education and Public Information. • Disposal Facihty Capacity. • Funding. • Plan Integration. Volume II contains the three solid waste generation studies required by AB 939: • Waste Disposal Chamcter'vation. • waste Diversion Characterization. • Waste Generation Forecasts. These waste generation studies provide the background data necessary to prepare the Element. PLA1V DEVEIAPMIIV'P PROCESS The Soun:e Reduction and Recycling Element was developed as part of a coalition of five jurisdictions in western San Becnartlino Couuy, made up of Chino, Montclair, Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, and parts of the unincorporated area of Western San Bernardino County. These areas joined together to enhance possibilities for regional cooperation, and to reduce the total cost of the plan preparation process. The five jurisdictions shared one waste characterization study and, because of similar demographic conditions, there was considerable overlap in the analysis of diversion alternatives. Nevertheless, a separate,S)tR x I -2 SCS ENGINEERS - Element report has been prepared for each area with specific input from appropriate local staff. ' SL:~L~L4RY OF OBJECTIVES Following is a summary of the objectives identified in each of the seven action-oriented components of this plan. Together, they establish the foundation for the City's program to meet or exceed the waste diversion goals of AB 939. • Educate residents and businesses about source reduction. • Devise methods ro quantify source reduction. • Reduce the use of rronrecyclable materials. • Replace disposable materials and products with reusable materials and products. • Reduce excess packaging. • Reduce the residential yard waste. • Improve the efficiency of office paper use. • Increase the purchase of repairable products. • Increase the useful life of products. • Expand curbside recycling to serve all single-family households by January 1993. • Develop and unplement multifamily recycling program by January 1993. • Begin audits and development of commercial industrial mcycling by March 1992. • Initiate instltudonaUaffice recycling programs by March 1992. • Consider modifying City zoning and building codes to requve space for recycling containers. $~ t-3 SCS ENGINEERS - • Participate N planning of a regional multijurisdictional materials recovery and processing facility to be developed by January 1995. • Modify purchasing procedures to increase markets for recyclable materials by June 1992. • Expand the number of materials collected m the curbside program by January 1995. • Expand commerciallindustrial recycling programs to accept a~ ditional materials and to insure that all appropriate establishments ate being serviced by 7anuary 1995. • Divert 50 to 55 percent of green waste generated in the short term. • DiveR 80 percent of gteea waste generated in the medium term. • Build pubhc participation in source separation of green waste. • Expand markets for green waste compost. Scecial Waste • Minimize the hazard potemial of any special waste generated. • DiveR special wastes from disposal whenever possible. ?.' I-4 Education and Public Iefotmatiae SC5 ENGINFEgS - • Create an awareness level of 60 percent by all residents regarding the recycling, composting, and waste reduction efforts by 1945, and a 90 percent level by the year 2000. • By 1993, estabflsh a "Block Leader" pFOgtam for the support of City recycling and source teduMion plans. • Develop and have in place recycling, composting, and soutoe reduction educa- tional cu[ricula utilized 6y 50 percent of all local schools by 1995, and 100 percen[ by the year 2000. • Establish with the local Chamber of Commerce a commercial tecyelets forum and a source teductioe and recycling awatds tecoguition pmgtam for local businesses. • Identify sufficient futtding soutces so Nat aB programs ate self-supporting. Funding sources include user fees, grants, and other state-sponsored incentives. • Capital coat will be amortized over the planing period and included in the operating budgeW. 1-5 SECTTON 2 SOLID WASTE GENERATION ANALYSffi LN7RODUCTTON 5<S ENGINEFNS - SCS prepared AB 939 Solid Waste Generation Studies for five jurisdictions in West San Bernardino County. These include the unincorporated area of West San Bernardino County, Rancho Cucamonga, Chino, Upland, and Montclair. Results of the study pertaining to the City of Rancho Cucamonga ate summarized in this section. Results of the studies for all five jurisdictions are presented in Volume II. The purpose of the study was to: • Estimate for each jurisdiction the quantities and types of wastes generated by residential, cotnntercial, industrial, and other sources that ate disposed N permitted landfills. • Estimate solid waste currently being diverted fmm the Lmdfill by recycling and/or composting efforts. • Prepare waste genera[ion forecasts for the next 15 years. .c 2-1 SCS FNGINEFNS - The waste chazactertzation study is based on the results of a 10-day quantitative field analysis which included manually sorting representative refuse samples ta accordance with AB 939. AB 1820, and the Planning Guidelines issued by the CIWMB, and interviews with each jurisdiction, waste haulers, and landfill operators. SL'~LYfAXY OF SOLID WASTE GE.~7ERATIOV STUDY Wa a D- nosal and Div scion The toW amount of solid waste generated annually within the City of Rancho Cucamonga is estimated at 148,080 tons. This includes 135,680 tons of waste cumntly being disposed of at the Milliken Landfill, and 12,400 tons currently being diverted by recycling, composting, etc. Table 2-I summarizes the current disposal, diversion, and generation tares for each category of generator. W ce haraM lion Statistically valid samples of waste were taken from the residential, commercial, and industrial waste streams, and were sorted into 37 waste types established by the AB 939 regulations. Table 2-2 presents a summary of the data for each sector and the overall waste composition for Rancho Cucamonga, Waste Generation Forgvw Waste generation forecasts are based on projected growth rates for each jurisdiction, using data provided by the City Planning Department General Plan and demographic information, U.S Census data, California Departtent of Finance population data, Southern Califomia Association of Governments (SCAG) housing projections, and larEd use maps. The 1990 _~ 2-2 Sts ENGINEERS - census population was 114,954. Based on [he anticipated growth rate, waste generation rotes are expected to be 178,548 and 213.296 tons per year by 1995 and 2000, respectively, as discussed in detail in Section 4 of the Was[e Generation Study. To meet the diversion rotes mandated by AB 939 of 25 percent by 1995 and 50 percent by the year 2000, SCS estimates that 35,710 and 106,650 tons of solid waste must be diverted in 1995 and 2000, respectively. At the present time, approximately 8.4 percent of the total amount of solid waste generated by the Ciry is being diverted fmm the landfill. Waste generation forecasts showing the amount of waste disposed, diverted, and generated by waste type and category over the 15-year forecast period are presented in Volume II, Waste Generation SNdies. MATERIALS TARGETED FOR DIVEILSION Disposed Wastes Ta~cfcd for Diversion by Cnlected Pro¢rn~a Based on the waste charactetiration sNdy, wastes which ate currently disposed but which could potentially be diverted through theunplementadon of programs described in this document include the following: • Paper: Newsprint. Comrgated containem. Aigh-grade. Mixed. • Plastics: - Containers. - PET. - }IDPE. c z~. 2-3 • Glass: - California Redemption Value. - Containers. • tifetafs: Aluminum cans. Tin cans. Ferrous. Nonferrous. White goods. SCS ENGINEERS - • Yard waste: - Grass/leaves. - Ptunings. • Nonpaper organics: - Wood. • Other wastes: - Asphalt. - Concrete. - Other inert solids. • Special wastes: - Bulky items. 2-4 - - - SCS ENGINEERS - Estimates of the amounts and types of materials that could reasonably be expected to be diverted through implementation of each of the proposed programs are presented throughout the subsequent sections of [his report. Dis>zosed Wanes Not Tareeted for Diversion 6v Selected Proaran~c Materials not targeted for diversion by selected programs include the following: • Contaminated paper. • Plastics: - Film. - Polystyrece. - Other. • Other glass. • Mixed metals. • Nonpaper organics: - Food. - Titus and rubber. - Manure. - Disposable diapers. - Textiles. r~ 2-5 5<5 ENGINFEN$ - • Other wastes: Fines. Miscellaneous. • Special wastes: - Asbestos. These materials ate not targeted for diversion for a variety of reasons, including: • Lack of available markets. • Availability of cost-effective Eecovery methods. • Pace of collection. • Many of these materials are nonrecyclable and/or compostable. For example. there are no known recycling programs for asbestos; food wastes (which have a high potential for composting) ate difficult to collect. Some of these materials may be considered for recycling/composting under contingency plans if the mandated diversion rates cannot be met using programs described in this report. Such materials would include the following: • Film. • Polystyrene. • Mined metals. • Food. • Tires and robber. • Textiles. 2-6 TABLE 2-1. OVERALL ANNUAL 'r1A STE OI SP OSAL RATE FOP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA 3assYNeNnAt onva9ecTAC 1loa szR7An ov e3ws, NmL Source NmG Sousse waste Source Nm to Ca~~s; •~. cr, 3v s,» =rs 3wL 'Ib_a iy :brs +~ ~/v _'.s PAPOq 5lc aprmt 9.1 6,000 2.8 1,070 1.2 300 SJ 7,'60 Corrugated Ccntau*•rs 5.6 3,560 11.4 4,350 10.7 2,6]0 8.2 10,580 k sgh-grade i.4 320 5.0 1,910 6.3 I,5]0 J.1 4,100 :fixed 7,0 q,610 10.8 4,120 7.6 1,900 8.1 10,630 Contmnis,eted J.7 2,440 6.5 2,480 1.9 470 /.2 5,790 PIJ1S1'SCS Canwn¢e 0.5 330 0.6 230 1.0 250 0.6 810 PET :.4 920 0.6 130 0.7 170 1.0 1,730 FaJPE 1.7 1,120 I.0 780 0.1 20 1.2 1,510 Film 7.1 2,440 5.4 2,060 3.1 ]70 1.1 5,1]0 Polystyrene 0.9 590 0.6 Il0 0.9 220 0.8 1,050 OtheY • ea J.3 2,170 J.J 1,260 16.6 4,140 5.9 7,580 GI Ca. Red~tian valor 4.0 2,610 1.6 610 O.d 100 2.6 1,350 Contain¢e 1.1 1,380 0.7 270 0.0 G 1.3 1,650 ou< o.o a o.2 eo o.0 0 0.l eo NS-V8 1luainum ca.. a./ 160 0.7 no o.0 0 0.1 530 Tin. fen 2.1 1,380 1.2 460 0.9 120 1.6 1,070 Ferzoue 2.3 1,510 2.5 950 J.7 920 2.6 7,190 Wntr[raue 0.3 I00 0.4 150 0.9 I20 0.1 570 Ffiiu rao0a 0.0 0 0.3 110 0.0 0 0.1 110 Rixd Metale 4.2 2,770 1.3 460 1.2 300 2.7 3,520 YARD IAbRE GreN lLeavN 24.3 16,010 5.4 2,060 L1 270 11.2 18,740 Prtu~}nge 3,3 2,1]0 0.6 230 0.0 0 '_.9 2,400 NON-PAPl9l ORCJ11RC5 Food 7.7 2,140 7.1 1,180 I.I 300 J.0 3,910 Wod 5.2 7,130 15.7 5,9% 19.0 4,710 11.0 }1,160 Tlr< and Rubber 0.0 0 J.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Neulae 1.2 790 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.6 790 Diepoeslde 1.8 1,190 0.7 170 0.0 0 1,1 1,150 7rYtllae 1.7 1,120 0.8 710 1.5 620 1.6 2,050 Oth< ' 0.3 200 0.7 110 I.B 150 0.6 760 OTlQ Ip8 If! Asphalt 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.5 110 0.1 110 Con¢eb 0.6 400 B.9 7,400 9.8 2,450 1.8 6,240 Oth< mart Solids 0.0 0 0.0 0 5.9 1,470 1.1 1,470 NcueaOOld Naz. HaL 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Fines 0.9 590 1.8 690 0./ 100 1.1 1,780 Misc. 7.6 2,370 6.0 2,290 0.1 100 3.7 4,760 SPF.CFJIL NA871[S Albeetos 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 eullry 1tB Q~Q 0 0.0 0 Q.0 0 ~ ~ 10A17. 100 65,880 100 38,160 100 2/,%0 100 129,000 mr not include self-haul or city/ca~nty Iarvices veeu ecurcN 2-7 SCS ENGINFFNS - TABLE 2-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ERISTING WASTE DIVERSION LISTED SY SOURCE A1VD TYPE Source Category Type Annual Toss Diverted Residential AB 2020 Glass Mixed 210 Residential AB 2020 Metal Aluminum Cans 210 Residential AB 2020 Plastic Not Specified 10 Residential Paper OCC 50 Residential Paper ONP 100 Sub-total 610 Commercial Other Asphalt 750 Commercial Other Concrete 900 Commercial GtcenWaste TrceTrimmings 1,100 Commercial Paper OCC 1,350 Subtotal 4,100 Industrial Glass Cullett 210 Industrial Metal Aluminum Chips 60 Industrial Metal Aluminum Sctp 230 Industrial Metal Cold Rolled Stcel 53 Industrial hfetal Stainless Scrap 284 Industrial Metal Steel Scrap 3,800 [ndusttial Organic Wood Shavings 96 Industrial Other Concrete 600 Industrial Paper OCC 525 Industrial Plastic PET 12 Suh-total 5,870 All sources' Paper OCC 3 All sources Paper ONP l97 Suh-total 200 ~ 2-8 TABLB 2-2 (C CPfY OF RANCgO CUCAMEHVGA ERIST71~iG WASTE DTV&B.4ION LLRTFD BY SOURCE AND TYPE Source Category Type Aunual Tous Diverted Landfill Salvage Metal Mixed 876 Landfill Salvage Organic Wood 744 Subtotal 1,620 TOTAL 12,400 ' Regional buy-back crnters 2-9 SCS ENGINEERS - TABLE 2-3. AVERAGE SELRHAUL WAST& COMP'OSTPION FOR THE PARTICII'ATING 7iTRLSDICTIONS Waste Category Average Percent By Weight Yard Waste 31.4 Wood Waste 33.0 Roof/Drywall 3.2 DiNRocks 5.2 Plastic 3.6 Wh3e Goods l.3 Metal d.5 Furniture 0.4 Textiles 3.0 Concrete 6.4 Ca.~dboard/Paper 2.9 Total 100.0 - z 2-IO -. SCS ENGINFfNS - SECTION 3 SOURCE REDUCTION CO~ONEN"I LNTRODUCTION Source reduction is defined by the CIWMB as "any action which cauxs a net reduction in the genefation of solid waste. Source reduction includes, but is not limited to, Educing the ux of nonrecyclable materials, replacing disposable materials and products with reusable materials and products, reducing packaging, reducing the amount of yard waztes generated, estabhshing garbage rate strocmres with incentives to reduce the amount of wastes that generators produce, and increasing the efficiency of the ux of paper, cardboard, glass, metal, plaztic, and other materials. Source reduction does not include steps taken after the material becomes solid waste or actions which would impact air or water resources N lieu of land, including, but not limited to, transformation." Source reduction has the highest priority in the waste management hierarchy (reduce, reux, recycle, landfill). It teprexots an approach that precedes waste management and addresxs how products are designed, manufactured, purchased, and used m reduce the quantity and tonicity of waste produced when the products are purchased, az well az when they teach the end of they uxfut lives. Technical options for communities considering source reduction include product reux, reduced material volume, reduced toxicity, increased product lifetime, and decreased consumption. Conscientious source reduction efforts are just beginning to be implemented; therefore, it is difficult to quantify the actual impact that source, reduction programs will have on the waste stream. Source reduction may be practiced at the business and houxhold levels through xlective buying patterns and reux of products and materials. &caux it requires increasing %: 3-1 SCS ENGINEERS - awareness, and changing attitudes and behavioral patterns, a major effort must focus on education. Source reduction programs often requite research, fmancial incentives and disincentives. regulations, and technological developments. Many of the alternatives that focus on reducing packaging are best appfled at the state or national level to merge with product advertising and sales trends. OBJECTIVES Source Reduction Objectives Source reduction is an esxntial first step in an overall integrated waste management plan. By taking steps to prevent waste from entering the waste strraat, costly programs that will recycle, compost, or transport and dispox of the material can be avoided. The SRR Element must include source reduction programs which work well at the municipal level, while providing support to the activities which can best be accomplished on a larger scale at the state and federal levels. With this in mind, the City of Rancho Cucatnonga has adopted nine broad objectives for accomplishment during the short- and medium-term planning periods. Thex ate: • To educate trsidentt and businesses regarding the concept and practice of source reduction. • To devix methods of quantifying source reduction. • To rtduce the ux of nonrecyclable materials. • To replace disposable materials anJ products with reusable materials and prod- ucts. • To reduce packaging. • To reduce the amount of residential yard wastes. 3-2 • To 'unprove the efficiency of office paper use, • To purchase repairable products. SCS ENGINEERS - • To increase the longevity of the materials used in industrial operations by considering durability, reusability, and recyclability as product selection criteria. Priority Materials for W e Diversion Based on the waste generation study, the materials targeted for the development of source reduction programs are cortuga[ed containers, paper products, plastics, wood, yard waste, food, manure, disposable diapers, metals, white goods, and textiles. All types of yard waste can 6e removed from the residential waste stream by backyard composting. The life of textiles, leather products and appliances can be extended by donating them to charities and thrift shops. Increased usage of high-grade paper is achieved in offices through converting waste paper into mlephorre message pads and scratch paper, the use of double-sided copies, and the reduction of copies made through the use of routing slips. The amounts of corrugated cardboard and mixed paper may be reduced by investigating methods of eliminating some junk mail and packaging. rlltematives m disposable items, such as cloth diapers and disposable plates and mugs, should be identified. The amount of diversion anticipated through implementation of source reduction programs is very difficult to quantify at this poim N the planning process. However, as goals, the City targets total waste stream source reduction of 1 percent in the short-term, and 3 percent in the medium-term planning periods. he J3 EXISTLtiG CONDtITONS Descriotion of Existing Pro¢rantc SCS ENG~NFFNS - At present, there are no swcmred source reduction programs in the City of Rancho Cuca- monga. While source reduction activity is occurring a[ thrift stores (textiles, appliances), appliance repair shops (electronics and other Bumbles), and diaper services, detailed, quan- tifiable reconis of diverted waste from these activities are not available. The City has enacted an ordinance which bans the purchase and use of polystyrene containing chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). In the future, this policy may also include source reduction activities once they are defined and ag[eed upon. Types and Ouautrties of Wastes Djverted by Bounce ReduRion Current amounts of materials diverted Shrough source reductioo are assumed to be very small relativr to the total amount of waste generated in the City (less than I percent). Therefore, no diversion credit is cartently being claimed. A~ipatFd Reductions in Fsistiat Diversion It is assumed that the thrift stores and repair shops will continue operation throughout the planning period. In fact, as public awarecess grows regarding the need to participate in source reduction programs, these stores may see a significant incrrase in donations. DESCRIFI'ION OF SOURCE REDUCTION ALTERNATIVES This section presents descriptions of l4 source reduction programs to be considered in this component of the SRR Element Each program is evaluated by criteria specified by the CIWMB and criteria added by City staff. .e 4. 3-4 ENGINEERS - Source [eduction alternatives presented in this section fall into four categories: rnte structure modifications, other economic incentives, technical assistance, and regulatory programs. Rate structure mod cations provide motivation to reduce the amount of solid waste gener- ated in homes, businesses, and industries. Other economic incentives are manifested through estabhshment of grants, loans, and loan guarantees. Technical assistance programs teach businesses, industries, and consumers to recognize and reduce waste at the source. Regula- tory programs refer to policies, laws, and regulations adopted by the City, County of San Bemaniino, State, or Federal governments which limit waste generation. The 14 source reduction altemarives described in this section are listed by category below: • Rate Sttucmre Modifications: Quantty-Based Variable Rates for CommerciaUIndustrial Wazte Generators (including Multifamily Dwellings). - Quantity-Based Variable Rates for Households. • Economic Incentives: - Loans. Loan Guarantees, Grants, and Contributions. • Technical Assistance: - Wazte Evaluarions/Waste Minimiution. - Backyani Composting Programs. - Educational Efforts. - Awards and Public Recognition. Norrptocurement Source Reduction Programs by the City Government. x~ 3-5 • Regulatory Programs: Supplementing City Government Pfncummeot Policies. Waste Reduction Plans. Product Bans. Advance Waste Disposal Fees. Land Use and Development. Fines and Penalties. Rate Structure 1~fodircatioas SCS fNGINfERS - Quantity-Based Variable Rates for CommerciaUIndustrial Waste Generators (including multifamily dwellings)- Set fates for pickup; of commerciaUindustrial waste and multifamily dwellings are pfesently charged to waste genefators yr the Ciry of Rancho Cucamc nga (for the purposes of discus- sion, multifamily dwellings afe considered commercial accounts in the description and evaluation of this alternative from here on). These rates are based upon the size of the container and the frequenry of collection. Quantity-based variable rates may be used to foster source reduction in apartment complexes and commercial industrial sources. it should be noted that program design has a major effect on the potency of any variable rate program. Most systems that eurrendy charge a variable fee do so according to volume. This could be accomplished on a commerciaUindustrial basis by establishing a baseline volume for a given business, and by charging for increased numbers of pickups or larger sized waste containers which exceed the baseline limits. [f a weight-based system were employed, waste haulers would be required to use an on-board method of weighing containers, a cumbersome procedure at best. Variable rate fees that rise rapidly with increasing volume tend m place a strong economic incentive upon reducing the amount of waste, thus providing an excellent impetus for participation in source reduction and fecycling programs. This alternative is somewhat ; ;y. 3-6 SCS ENGMFENS - limited by the fact that generators can compact their waste up to a certain point. However. i is the most viable tool for source Seduction, and may be practically applied to all waste types (industrial, commercial, and residential). Variable mte structures may require both anti- dumping and antiscavenging ordinances to deter [hex activities, as the variable rates and the recycling programs will tend to provide incentives for both dumping and scavenging. Siaterials targeted for source reduction by this alternative include paper products (including high-grade, corrugated cardboard, and mixed paper) plastics (film, polystyrene), and disposable products (pens, batteries, paper towels, eating utensils, diapers, etc.). Quantity-Based Variable Rates Por Households- A flat-rate charge for garbage pickup and disposal is currently assessed for residential collection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, allowing residents m dispose of an unlimited amount of houxhold wazte for one fee. This rate is currently set at 515.20 a month with a 50.70 differential for residents living north of Banyan Street. Variable mte fees for houxhold resideots involve charges for the number of cans used, the number of bags collected, or the frequency of collectoo. This is similar in principle to other xrvice-based utility charges, such az water and elecVicity. These fees are directly propor- tional to actual disposal costs; consequently, cesideots have the opportunity to [educe costs by generating less waste. Thex variants require some flexibility in thu dehvery of xrvice to houxholds and will lead to the following decisions: whether containers are provided by the collector or the generator, the types and sizes of containers used, and the ux of stickers or special tags to identify legitimate containers. Most systems that currently charge a variable fce do so according to volume. The City of Seattle has a well developed program using this approach. However, given that not every container is necessarily full and the densities of some wastes ate different from others, the argument has been m_ ade that weight-based systems would be more equiUble (overshadQvying ~x 3-7 SCS ENGINEERS - this argument is the time, effort, and expense involved in weighing each waste container). jurisdictions implementing variable talc programs may find that they result in reduced quantities of waste; therefore, the revenues generated 6y the collection may be overestimated and insufficient to cover the fixed costs of the hauler. The solution to this problem is the use of a fixed subscription fee to cover fixed costs, plus a variable rate fee for the actual quantities of waste collected. Rate swemre modifications for households can provide a furancial 'unpems to participate in source reduction, recycling, and yard waste programs. In fact, rate s[nlc[ure modifications of this nature should be viewed as adjunMS to recycling and yard waste programs developed in other components of the SRR Element. As directed toward residential waste generators. materials targeted for source reduction by this alternative include paper and plastic packag- ing, disposable products (pens, diapers, etc.), food waste, yard waste, and wood. Economic Incentives Loans, Loan Guarantces, GrnMS, nod Contributionv- Loans, loan guarantees, grants, and contributions enhance the effectiveness of other programs and alternatives. Under this alternative, the City would provide grant funding to encourage the economic development of businesses, nonprofit getups, or associafions that promote source reduction. In additlon, the City can also lend its support in exploring and developing other funding sources such as industry fvwrcial support, in-kind donations (composting bins or use of facilities for workshops, and seminars), and private foundation contributions to be used in developing and implementing source reduction methods. The targeted materials for this alternative depend on the source reduction activity planned; potentially any part of the waste stream may be diverted, including paper products, plastic packaging, food waste, Yard waste, and woad. z~c 3-8 SCE ENG~NEFRE - Technical AasLStance Waste Evaluations and Waste'.~Iinfmizstiou- Under this alternative, the City would encourage larger, commerciaUindus[rial waste generators in the community to conduct waste evaluations to identSy what types and amounts of wastes ate being Generated and to assist them N identifying and implementing waste minirttization techniques. The City could either comtmct to provide this assistance or prequalify consultants or businesses to offer these services. The Primary Purpose of the waste evaluation alternative is to increase cottwercial awareness of the need for, and bene£ns of, waste [eduction programs and to assist businesses to design andvoplement such pro- grams. Data collected from the waste evaluations could be used for several purposes: • Assessing Proper waste disposal fees. • Controlling the disposal of banned wastes into the waste stream (e. g., some organic wastes, household hazardous wastes, and some special wastes). • Fsmblishimg a waste gemeratiom database from which to measure furore progress in waste reduction. These evaluations could be required periodically to provide information on the generator's progress. This alternative targets large commercial and institutional gememtors. Materials diverted by this program might imclude paper, plastic, packaging, food waste, yard waste, scrap metals, and wood. c .~ 3-9 Backyard Composting Programs- 56 ENGINEERS - This alternative involves developing technical assistance programs to encourage backyard composting of yazd waste and other organic wastes by homeowners. Yard, wood, and food wastes are large components of the waste stream; source reduction programs targeted at these wastes can significantly affect the amount of waste going to the landfills. While backyard composting programs focus on residential yard waste, they could also apply to commercial and instimtional generators. Although residential generators contribute a greater proportion of yard waste to the waste stream, they are also more numerous and require widespread educational and technical assistance programs. Both institutional and residential generators may respond to economic and regulatory incentives. Under this alternative, the City would encourage all generators of yard wastes, especially homeowners, to separate their yard wastes from the waste stream and reuse these wastes through composting. The City can foster this approach through a number of activities designed to support backyard composting, as illustrated in the following examples: • Provide yard waste generators with low~ost bins designed for composting and a Flyer on bow to start composting. • Impose a very high fee for yard waste collection, providing an incentive for the generator to compost the waste oo-site. • Develop and/or support educational awareness (e.g., demonstration projects) and technical assistance programs related to backyard composting. • Require all groundskeeping and other landscape maintenance companies operating within [he City to provide a composting service to their customers and ban them from disposing of yard wastes in a location other than a composting or drop-off facility. or composting on site. 3-IO SCS ENGINEERS - The fundamental premise of this alternative is that the targeted organic, compostabie waste does not enter the waste stream at any time and is not collected, processed, or disposed of by the City or its contractors. 'I7ds alternative must meet these requirements in order to qualify as a source reduction program. Programs that rely on the City providing collection and composting services for yard wastes do not qualify as source [eduction programs and ate treated separately. This distinction serves to highlight the purpose of source reduction alternatives, which is to encourage reduction in the generation of wastes so that the community waste disposal programs are not required to collect, process, or dispose of these wastes. while these two approaches to composting programs serve different goals (reduction versus composting diversion) they may be complementary when implemented with appropriate rate structures. Further information on alternatives for community composting programs and services can be found in the Composting Compocent of this report. Educational Efforts- This alternative involves (I) educating the public about the need for, and the benefits of. source reduction, (2) providing information to the public on ways to actually implement source reduction techniques in their personal and business activities, and (3) educating the commercial industrial sector on methods m quantify source-reduced wastes so the City may claim it as diversion credit. Education activities are currently underway in Rancho Cucamonga and are coordinated through the City ManagePs office and the Favvonmental Management Committee. Educational efforts involve developing and/or sponsoring consumer awareness programs, school curricula, seminars, and public forams that will incrttase awareness of the solid waste problem, the economic and environmental benefits of source induction programs, and of any regulatory requirements that mandate certain types of source reduction activities. Educa- tional efforts should also seek to change consumer purchasing patterns by introducing the concept of "source reduction" to the community. 3-II SCS FNGMFENS - This alternative requites the City to act as a catalyst for the implementation of source [eduction efforts within the community. The City would serve as a clearinghouse for information on source reduction techniques and provide a means for promotion of rapid and zffective expansion of source reduction activities. The City would also support the eommerciaUindustnal sector in devising and implementing methods of quantifying the amounts of waste murimiza[ion achieved through source reduction activities. Quantification could be estimated through the development of a brief questionnaire which could be filled out by the company and sent back to the proper city agency. This questionnaire might list categories of waste, rite steps taken to reduce, and a rough quanti- fication of these diverted materials. This information could subsequently be used as diversion credit. Educational efforts are vital to the success of other source reduction almrnatives. These effons should target all waste generators within the City. :#wards and Public Recognition- This alternative involves generating public support for source reduction by recognizing individuals, groups, or businesses that actively engage in source reduction and/or waste minimization effons, and that support the community's source [eduction programs. This altemative serves as a complement to public education, technical assistance, and grant programs. Approaches developed for this alternative could range from local pride programs emphasizing waste reduction and environmental awareness to using total newspapers to report exemplary source reduction programs as well as noncompliance. These programs could increase compliance with other alternatives, such as warm audits and repotting requirements for source reduction programs. 3-12 SCS ENGINEERS - This altemative targets all waste generators, both residential and commercial. The materials dived by this altemative will depend upon which programs these awards and statemznts of public recognition are associated with. The Environmental Management Commission could add source reduction as pan of its Environmental Leadership Project. `onprocurement Source Reduction Programs By the City Govetmment- ~;onpcocurement programs involve all methods of source reduction that are not associated with purchasing decisions. This alternative requires the City to undertake a number of programs aimed at altering the behavior of personnel m reduce the amount of waste gener- ated on a day-to-day basis. These pmgrams could include familiarizing city employees with source reduction practices, such azdouble-sided copying, increasing the use of scratch paper. making fewer drafts of reports, using electronic mail, etc. This alternative provides ao opportunity for the City itself to develop and implement a model source reduction program that can be used as an example for private, public, and commercial entities in the area. This alternative targets all City Departments. RgEulatorv Proetxmts Supplementing City Government Procrtrement Poticies- This alternative involves the City Carrrcil supplementing the proposed recycled procurement policies to include the wncepLS of rwsability and reduced material content. Additionally, the City could specify that any business or orgmt'vation holding a contras with i[ would have to have a source reduction plan of program. The City could adopt purchasing preferences for recycled products as a part of this program; however, this would not qualify as "source reduction." This alternative targets all City Depannteots. Materials that will be diverted thmugh scarce reduction include paper products and packaging, P~ Products and packaging, al] .~ :~ 3-13 SCS ENGINFEPS - disposable items, stationery, office supplies, tires, batteries, and food service items. Waste Reduction Plans by Commercial and Industrial Generators-- The Citc may require waste reduction planning and reporting for large commercial, industri- al, and/or institutional waste generators that is similar to what the State of California has required of cities and counties (AB 939). Thus, the City would delegate the responsibility for implementing source reduction programs to the target waste generators in the community. Like the City itself these businesses would report their progress regulazly (e. g., when they apply for business license renewal. Implementation of this alternative would requue that the City cover the administrative costs of hiring staff or retaining consultants to review plans developed by major generators. Restricting or selecting the number of entities that must complete these evaluations allows the community to [educe the administrative burden and cost to both the public and private sectors. As examples. waste evaluations might be restricted to certain categories of commer- cial generators according to the Standard Industrial Code, employee siu, or by the quantities and types of wastes known to be generated by those enterprises. Product Bans-- The City may ban targeted products and packaging techniques to reduce waste at [he source and provide a ref environmental benefit. Bans might be considered on 9roducts and packaging that do not Iend themselves to recycling or source reduction. The criteria for product bans ate similar to those used to determine the appbcability of advance disposal fees. Examples include disposability, difficulty in reuse or recycling, and availability of environ- mentally sound substitutes (such as disposable razors, nonrefillable pens, nonreusable beverage containers). For exartrple, some communities (e. g., Berkeley, California) have banned polystyrene foam packaging from fast food restaurants. In fact, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has a CFC ordinance in place. Other communities have banned items such as nonrecyclable bevemge containers. Communities that pursue this kind of alternative often ~µ 3-I4 5C5 ENGINEERS - adopt a time limit or phaseout period for the ban to take effect, providing time for residential and commercial consumers to adjust to the policy and identify substitutes. Advance Waste Disposal Fees- Under this alternative, the City would consider support of legislation on advance disposal fees currently before the State Legislature. This legislation, AB 2213, would place advance disposal fees on certain products that are either nontecyclable or are disposable and non- reusable. Products offered for sale that have excess packaging could also be included. The fee charged for these products could approximate the reasonable costs of disposing of the product or could be higher and raise funds for other waste disposal purposes, M advanced disposal fee could be placed on disposable products such az pens, razors, cameras, beveage containers, and diapers. In addition, this alternative could be applied to products that have a range of useful life spans, with the fee being applied to the products with shaver life spans, to induce the consumer to purchase the longer lasting products. Examples of these kinds of products are car tires, batteries, and appliances. The fee structure of this alternative seeks to create a hierarchy ofurcentives to alter con- sumer behavior as follows: first, buy reusable, recyclable, and durable products; second, repair older items such as white goods (tha replacement may catty a fce); foully, purchase only what is necessary of products that ate disposable and have no substitutes. The City would support this legislation rather than attempt m enforce a local swcture. It would be beyond the scope of the City to develop, implement and enforce such a system without at least regional, if not Sute or Federal support. Land Cse and Developmeot- 3-15 SCSFNGWEFNS- This alternative involves establishing incentives and disincentives to land use and develop- ment regulations to encourage source reduction programs. For example, the City could enact regulations stating that an entity could not open a new business, relocate an old one, build or otherwise develop property for commercial or residential purposes without presenting a plan describing how much waste and of what type (yard wastes, residential, commercial, etc.) will be added to the waste stream, and what programs will be implemented to encaurage source reduction within the new development. Requirements could also be imposed to require that space be set aside for on-site composting. This program would be designed to supplement existing standards for recycling facilities adopted in 1991 by the City ~lamiug Commission. These land use standards currently arc directed towards recycled materials collection and or processing facilities. Under new standards, primarily larger commercial and institutional generators, az well as real estate development corporations, will be targeted by this alternative. Materials diverted by this program might include paper, plastic, food, yard waste, wood, and metal, FSnes and Penaltitss- A system of fines and penalties should be viewed az a supplement to other chosen source reduction alternatives. Fines and penalties could be assessed on commercial/industrial generators of waste materials az well az residences. The imposition of fates or penalties may be used to enforce source reduction programs and to ensure compliance, in addition, fines collected could be allocated to fund programs conducted by local community groups, such az those designed to provide education and technical assistance for backyard composting programs. 3-16 SCS ENGINEERS - EVALtiATION OF SOLRCE REDCCTION ALTFI2NATIVES Rate Structure ~foditicatio The evaluation of variable rotes for commercial/industrial waste genem[ors (including multi- family dwellings) includes the following criteria: Effectiveness of thgpro mm, The amount of estimated reductions in the waste stream resulting from acommercial/industrial (for [he purposes of discussion. mu1tU'amily dwellings are included as commercial accounts) with variable rate strucmre depends on the level of participation among businesses (defined as the "participation rote" or percentage of generators actively participating) and the effectiveness of the participants' reduction efforts (de£med as the percentage of reduction achieved, or "reduction rote"). These two rotes are sensitive to the cost of collection and disposal: as rotes increase, the "participation rote" and "reduc- tion rote" will increase. There is an upper limit to the variable rote structure; as rotes increase beyond what is perceived as reasonable, illegal dumping can occur. The participation and reduction rotes ate also sensitive to the impact of other alternatives such as public education and awareness programs. Projected diversion rotes are dependent upon the type of program implemented and the rotes charged as volume or weight increases. At this time, there are no historical data on variable rote swctures to enable a prediction of diversion rotes. Ha~ardc «rriarM wi h the pmggEg, No direct envuonntental harard is associ- ated with rote sWCture mods^~t~ons. However, increased rotes for garbage collection may result in illegal dumpwg, both on public property and in the disposal containers of other commercial businesses. Variable rote stmctures oken necessitate the installation of locking dumpster mechanisms for commercial containers. ITtmping on open, private, or public property can result vt environ- mental and public health hazards. 3-17 ICS ENGINEERS - • Ability to accommodate chance. This alternative is adaptable to existing pro- grams and can be changed as circumstances warrant. Changes to rate structures. however, will require the approval of the appropriate agency, such as the City Council, and cooperation of the waste hauler. • Co~quences to the waste stream. This alternative will reduce the amount of solid waste generated, and consequently, a proportional amount of waste going to landfills. In addition, variable rate s[mcmres provide a strong incentive to separate and divert items from the waste stream when other programs are available; therefore, this alternative will be most effective in conjunction with a commercial/industrial recycling program. Source teduaion may also result in reduced amounts of materials available for any eommeroiallindustrial recycling programs. Addiflonally, this alternative (if volume-based) may result N the increased use of compactors. Consequently, the waste stream resulting fmm this alternative, may be of lower volume and higher density. • Timine. Implementation of this program can occur within the short-term plan- ning period. • Need for e><pattded or new facilities. No additional facilities ate required for vnplementation of this alternative. lfowever, community recycling programs that complement this alternative would require facilities. • on<ist npy wi h 1 A oo icies glans and orditt~~cPS. This alternative will requve a review of rate swemre, rate modification, and/or an ordinance by the City Council. • Institutional barriers to imglementatioa. Extra monitoring equipment may be required by the hauler, particularly U the program is weight-based. Additional equipment might include on-boartl scales or other devices to measure waste generated. 3-IS SGS ENGWEEPS -' • Cest of implementation. Implementation of this alternafive requites (I) a ate study to determine appropriate rate stntcmres for achieving the desired level of source reduction; (2) determination of whether the proposed rate would support the fixed and variable costs of collection and disposal, once source reduction has begun: i3) review and approval by the City Council (including a public hearing). f4) generation of informational and educational materials; (5) procurement of necessary equipment and (b) modification of existing billing operations. Estimated costs for a rote study depend upon the degree of detail requested. Generally, rate studies range from 550,000 to 575,000. Tn addition, btnchures to inform and educate managers and other decision makers about the ate change shou}d be distributed (estimated cosu: 4,500 businesses x50.50/brochure x 1 printings annually = 59,000). An estimated 80 to I20 hours of staff time mill be required to develop and implement the program with an additional 40 to 80 hours annually for program monitoring. • Av Oab'fty of marketslend-uses. Markets are not necessary for this altemative. • gyeatine exaerience. This type of altemative has not beep implemented to date. • Reyjorral apylicabil}ty. There are no significant advantages to taking a regional approach to this alternative. • Public acceutaac&. The change from a fixed fce system to a variable ate system, especially is conjunction with other source reductioa or diversion programs, will eotail a great deal of effort on the part of the jurisdittion m prepare managers for the new system: m explain how it works, and to assure managers drat the variable rote system is both necessary and equitable, and can be conveniently adopted. Initial private sector resistance can be mitigated if there is a strong perception that the progam is necessary, fair, and results in equal or better service. 3-19 SCS ENGINEERS - • Social responsibility. Business owners, managers, and employees would have to be made aware of the concept of source reduction and available alternatives. T'ne evaluation of quantity-based variable rates for households includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the oronta_m. 1'he amount of estimated reductions in the waste strram resulting from a variable rate swcture depends on the level of participa- tion among households (defined as the "participation rate" or percentage of generators actively participating) and the effectiveness of the participants' reduc- tion efforts (defined as the percentage of reduction achieved, or "r~Jduction rate"). These two rates are sensitive to the cost of collection and disposah as costs increase, the "participation rate" and "reduction rate" wi11 increase. There is an upper limit to the variable rate swcmre; as rates increase beyond what is per- ceived as reasonable, illegal dumping can occur. The effectiveness of the program will also be driven by alternatives to waste dumping offered by source eduction, recycling, and/or yard waste collection programs available. As m estimating the diversion through source reduction of this alternative, there ate no established histories of monitoring and evaluation of similar programs. Therefore, quant~cadon of meaningful source reduction alternatives is difficult at this time. • Ha'arns assrriateEl wi h tti~,oro¢ra ". No direct environmental hazard is associ- azed with rate structure modifications. However, increased rates for garbage collection may result in illegal dumping, both on public property and in the disposal containero of commercial businesses. Dumping on open, private, or public property ran result in environmental and public hearth hazards. • Ab~ty to aceommodare ch~nee. This alternative is easily adapted to existing programs and can be changed as circumstarrces warrant. Changes to rate struc- tures, however, will require the approval of the City Council and wdl necessitate 3-20 u S<S ENGINEERS - • Cost of implementation. Implementation of this alternative requires (l) a tatz study to determine appropriate rate stmcmres for achieving the desired level of source reduction; (2) determination of whether the proposed rate would support the feed and variable costs of collection and disposal, once source reduction has begun; (3) review and approval by the City Council (including a public hearing); (4) generation of informational and educational materials; (5) procurement of necessary equipment; and (6) modification of existing billing operations. Estimated costs for a rate study depend upon the degree of derail requested. Generally, rate snrdies range from 350,000 to 575,000. In addition, brochures to inform and educate managers and other decision makers about the rate change should be distributed (estimated costs: 4,500 businesses x 30.50/brochure x J printings annually = 59,000). An estmated 80 to 120 hours of staff tune will be required to develop and implement the program with an additional 40 to 80 hours annually for program monitoring. • Availability of marketslend-uses. Markets are not necessary for [his alternative. • tatinQ~lerience. This type of alternative has not been implemented to date. • R@yio t 'c-b~ity. Thera ate no significant advantages to taking a regional approach to this alternative. • Public acceptance. The change from a fixed fce system to a variable rate system, especially in conjunction with other source teductiop or diversion progruns, wW entail a great deal of effort on the part of the jurisdiction to prepare managers for the new system; to explain how it works, and to assure managers that the variable rate system is both necessary and equitable, and can be conveniently adopted. Initial private sector resistance can be mitigated ff there is a strong perception that the program is necessary, fair, and results in equal or better service. 3-19 cooperation from the waste haulers. SCS ENGINEERS - • Consequence to the wa to stream. This altemative will reduce the amount of solid waste generated, and, consequently, a proportional amount of waste going to landfills. In addition, variable tare strnetures provide a strong incentive to separate and divert items from the waste stream when other programs are available; therefore, this altemative will be most effective in conjunction with both recycling and yard waste composting programs. Source reduction may affect the amounts of materials colltxKed N these programs. Additionally, this altemative (if volume-based) may result N the incrtased use of compactors. Consequently, the waste stream resulting from this alternative may be of lower volume, higher density, and may contain much lower proportions of recyclables and yard wastes. • Timinrt. Implementaton of this program ...,r occur within the shoe-term plan- ning period. • Need for expanded or new faces tie-c. No additional faciltes ate required for implementation of this alternative. However, community recycling and compost- ing programs That complement this alternative would require facilities. • Consistency wiL IMaI i i a plans nd oMi an Pe. New rate swcturing would be developed by the City Manager's office and approved by the City Council. • Lcrimdort~i bar*+ers to itllplementaton. Then: am no apparant institutional barriers to implementation of this alternative. • Cost of fylplementatoa. Implementation, of this alternative requnes (I) a rate study to determine appropriate rate stmctures for achieving the desired level of source reduction; (2) detemtination of whether the proposed rate would support 3-21 SCS ENGINEERS - the fixed and variable costs of collection and disposal, once source reduction has begun: (3) review and approval by the City Council (incWding a public hearing); (S) generation of informational and educational materials; (5) procurement of either containers or approved stickers; and (6) mod cation of existing billing operations. Total estimated costs might include 550,000 to 575,000 for a rate study. In addition, information explaining the Eate stmcmre changes will have to be distributed to educate the public about the new rates and the availability of recycling alternatives (estimated costs: 27,000 homes x 50.50 = SI3,500). An estimated 80 to 120 hoots of staff time will also have to be allocated to develop, implement, and monitor the cote increases. • Avaz_ 'Iab~ty of m rtretc/ nd-rcP . Markets an; not necessary for this alternative. • Qpsrating~perience. Some communities, such as Seattle, Washington, are experimenting with these systems. At this time, there is not enough information to quantify source reduction effectiveness. • Reeional woo icab'l+tv. There are no particuhtr advantages to adopting this pro- gram on a regional basis. • Public accep nn P. The change from a feed fee system to a variable rate system, especially in conjunction with other source reduction or diversion programs (recy- cling and yard waste programs), will entail a great deal of effort on the part of the City to prepare the public for the new system, to explain how it works; and to assure the public that the variable rate system is both necessary and equitable, and can be conveniently adopted. Initial public resistance can be mitigated if there is a strong perception that the program is necessary, farr, and results N equal or better service. • Social resQonsibiHty. No social responsibility is required, due to the fact that the incentive will be economically driven. 3-22 z~ SCS ENGINEERS - F~onomic Incentive The evaluation of loans, loan guarantees, grants, and contributions includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the nroerun. This alternative can be effective because (1) it requites only nominal financial outlays or convibuuons in kind from the City (see below); (2) it makes use of the in-house expertise and skill of City staff in researching and developing other funding sources for the target entity (volunteer or community group); and (3) it allows the City to fatly utuize the exis[ing resources of the community in terms of expertise and organizational support for community source reduction efforts and policies. N the field of waste manage- ment, and especially in changing indrvtdual generator and household behavior, this kind of an atliaoce betwcen community groups and waste management authorities is invaluable. u .n~ •.snclaERRd with the oroEtram. No environmental hazards are created by this alternative. • Abuty_ t aced ch?nee. This alternative is very Flexible because it relies on community groups that are interested in promoung source reduction efforts through public awareness and technical assistance. As the City, the waste management system, and the waste stream change over time, the expertise and ability of rhea groups will change also. • on °^ nc ~ to the wa<te s tram. Community support for carefutly imple- mented programs will reduce the amount of solid waste. Changes in the waste stream composition will depend on the materials targeted for [eduction. T'm'n . This alternative can 6e implemented within the short-term plaEtning period. 3-23 ICS [NGMEEpS - • Need for expanded or new facilities. No facilities are requited for this alterna- tive. • Consistency with local oohcies plans and ordinanc~,5. This altemative presents no direct conflicts with current policies, plans, or ordinances. • Institutional barriers to implementation. There are no apparent institutions! barriers to implementation of this alternative. • Cost of implementation. At this time, program funding would probably be sought from grants. The costs of this altemative would involve the use of City staff resources to develop a.~d administer the program. Staff time of approximately l20 hoots per yeaz might be requted to develop, approve, andunplement each community project funded. For projects where staff assist community groups to obtain alternative funding from other sources (the State, trade associations, charitable foundations, etc.), an additional SO hours might be required. Other costs include an estimated 120 to 160 hours of staff time annually to administer the altemative. • Availability of markets/end-uses. No markets are requved for this altemative. • Ocera[in¢ exp ne •ence. This type of program is common in many different cities across the United States. • Public acceptance. High-profde and high-impact programs using well known and respected community groups would gain rapid pubhe acceptance and promote public involvement. • Reeional anolicability. Tltis altemative lends itself panicularly well to a regional approach. This would allow for an excellent working and problem-solving relationship to develop between jurisdictions, and would take advantage of the ,~ 3-24 56 EhG~HFERS - presence of many community groups (e.g., the Boy Scouts, the 4-13 Club, and the agricultural extension service). • Social reSTronsibility. This type of program could prove quite effective in raising social awareness of source reduction techniques N the community. TecbRleal rEISSL•tanCe Evaluation of waste evaluafions/waste minunization includes the following criteria'. • Effectiveness of the oroeram. This alternative seeks to target a limited number of large waste gecerators, while reinforcing other education and awareness pro- grams. Furthermore, because of the smaller number of entities and the high contribution to the waste stream, the impatt of source [eduction programs aimed at [here entities can be significant, while the administrative burden and cost can be minimal. This alternative provides a mechanism for measuring change in the waste stream and the impact of source reduMion programs among commercial generators. It also develops baseline data on commercial wastes and allows public agencies to make decisions based upon the impact of local programs. uaaaM..acnciare.i w. h he oroe~. No eavironmeotal hazards are created by tbis alternative. • Abgj{y to acce .[r change, This alternative can be modified to accommo- date change in the stock of generators, and the types and quantities of wastes generated. ~Sn •< to h w • ttream. This alternative tuts no direct effect on the waste stream. 3-25 iC3 ENGINEERS - • Timine. This altemative can be implemented in the short-term planning period. • Need for expanded or new facilities. No facilities are requited for this alterna- tive. • Consistency with local policies oLns. and ordinances. If the City were to choose this alternative, it may have to consider the adoption of a poficy or ordinance. • Institutional barriers to implementation. To requite waste evacuations, the City must ensure that it has the proper authority, including making the evaluation a part of either the business license renewal or the waste disposal contract for the generator. Additionally, a public agency and staff must be designated to oversee the program, ensure compliance, and collect and process the resulting data. • Cost of implementation. The costs for this alternative depend on the level of information collected in the waste evaluation. Requiring a fu0-scale waste characterization study by the Luger commercial generators would be prohibitively expensive and probably unnecessary. Amore scaled down version nr even a brief survey would be more affordable. The City should structure [he requirements of this alternative so that target genem[ors can conduct the waste evaluation using m-house staff and expertise, if possible. If necessary, resources may be required from outside consultant services or from the waste hauler. The overall costs of this alternative should be in the range of l to 4 hours for one member of the generator's staff and 2 to 4 hoots of a City staff member's time. Additional staff time would be needed to process the data from the waste evaluation (estimated 40 m g0 hours annually). • Availabiligt of marketslend-uses. Markets are not necessary for this alternative. 3-26 ~.S ENGWEf RS - • O~etatine experience. A pilot, voluntary program is operational in Seattle. There are other, similar programs N various phases of development in other cities. • ReQion~Irohcability. There ate no particular advantages to a regional approach for this alternative. Evaluation of backyard composting programs includes the following criteria: • EKectiveness of the p~Qr,~m. It is estimated that relatively few households will participate in a backyard composting program. However, those households that do compost yard, wood, and food wastes will probably achieve high reduction fates. If a community-wide composting program is implemented, it will cause a signif- icant reduction in backyard composting, although any fee charged for community- wide collection and composting of residential yard wastes may promote backyard composting. Though established backyard composting programs have existed in the United States for several years, quantificafion of diverted weight has not yet been effectively measured. • Hazanis associated with the oroeram. Through educational programs, the City may seek to ensure that proper composting techniques are used so that no public health or fete hazards are created. For example, if backyard composting is encouraged, especially with food wastes, the potential exists for rodents, odors, and other health concerns. • Abili(y to accommodate chance. This alternative is fairly easily changed to meet new conditions and situations. It could be adopted and developed artd then sub- sequently changed to accommodate needs for yard waste reduction, markets for compost, and ability to support technical assistance and education programs. J-27 ENGINEERS - • Con uences to the waste stream. 'This alternative will significantly alter the mix of organic material N [he waste steam. • Timine. This altemative could be implemented N the short-term planning period. Combining disposalJdumping bans, fees, and public education and technical assis- tance programs could result in an effective program within l year. • Need for new or expanded facilities. There are no facility requirements for this altemative. • Consistency with local policies. plans. and ordinances. This alternative presents no direct conflicts with current policies, plates, and otdinances. • InstiNtional barriers to unolementation. The selection of this al[emative depends upon the residents, their willingness to participate, the types of materials available to them, and the space available in then yards. • Cost of implementation. The costs of this alternative include the expenses for a public awareness and technical assistance program, as well as the cost of provid- ing composting bins to homeowners (roughly 520 per bin). Pubhe awareness program costs would vary, depending on the scope of the program and the tools used to convey the message. Program expenditures might include: Public education (pamphlets, flyers, door hangers). Public service notices placed in utility bills. Billboard adveNsements. Radio and television spots. 3-28 SCS ENGINEERS - Staff resources to develop, implement, and monitor the program (estimate 80 to 120 hours for development. 80 to 120 hours annually to manage the pro- gram) Seminars and public speakers. If 10 percent of the homes in the City of Rancho Cucamonga participated and the City purchased the composting bins (27,000 homes x 10 percent = 2,700), then the cost would be approximately 354,000 for the bins. Four mailing contacts aze anticipated annually, at a cost of 30.50 per contact (2,700 x 30.50 x 4 = 35,400). Therefore, estimated costs might be 359,400 for the fvst year with 160 to 240 hours of staff time. Program maintenance might be 35,400 for brochures plus 80 to 120 hours of staff time. • Availability of markets/end-uses. It is assumed that the compost is used by the generator. • Operatin¢ experience. Backyard composting has always been utilized in one form or another. Communities across the United States have pul on seminars and educated the geperal public about backyard composting. • Reeio~Gcability. Local communities could benefit from putting on work- shops or using the media m spread information about the merits of backyard composting. • public acceptance. There is no known opposition to backyard composting in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • Social rospopsibility. A great deal of awareness is required on the part of the homeowner to utilize proper composting techniques apd m know what types of materials to compost. - z: 7-29 Evaluation of educational efforts includes the following criteria: iC5 FNG WEEKS ^- • FSfe~tiveness of the ometam. No diversion credit occurs directly as a result of thSs program. However, the effectiveness of other diversion programs should increase. • i-Iaxazds associated with the omen+m. No environmental hazards are created by this alternative. • .4biti(y to accommodate chance. This alternative is very flexible because it relies on existing community resources for encouraging public awareness and technical assistance. As the community, the waste management system, and the waste stream itself change over time, the expertise and abilities of community resources will change also. New techniques and approaches will become available to the City by virtue of the informal tstationsNp between public agencies, businesses. households, and community groups. • Consequences to the warts stream. Changes in waste stream composition wdl depend on the effectiveness of the pub4c education effort and on the materials tugeted for reduction by Wore responding to the message of these programs. The mast likely areas far signiftcant impact would be backyard composing, commercial purchasing and pmcuremegt programs, office source reduc[ion, and consumer purchasing awareness. The waste stream materials that are anticipated to be most affected ate yard wastes and wood cuttings, office paper, plastic packaging, eormgated cardboard, other packaging products, and disposable prod- ucts, • Timinc. Initial public education efforts can be implemented in the shnrt term. These might include school programs, public forums, workshops, flyers, and door hangers. _t J-10 iC5 ENGWEERS - • Need for expanded or new facilities. Phis altemative requires no facilities. • Consistency with local policies ohms and ordinances. This altemative presents no direct conflicts with current policies, phms, and ordinances. • I~itutional barriers to imolemenmtiQn. Education programs may be easily implemented. • Cost of implementation. The cost of this alternative will vary dramatically, depending upon the scope of implementation. However, many of the other source reduction alternatives, as well as recycling and community composting programs, will depend upon an aggressive and successful public education program. The costs of this alternative would include the use of City staff resources to develop and administer the program. At least one full-time staff member should be devoted to the task of public education programs for the community's source reduction, recycling, and community composting efforts. In addition, there will probably be costs associated with the commercial/industrial quantificatior. ques- tionnaire, promotional brochures, pamphlets, Flyers, door hangers, and production costs for any use of the media or outside consultanu. • Avail?b Hty of ma*ke4ctend-us?s. Markets ate trot required for this program. Ooetatine ezperier~. Education programs for source reduction techniques are a common element of many recycling programs and workshops across the nation. • Regional applicability. Public education programs may be appropriately imple- mented over a regional arra including the cities and unincorporated ponions of San Remanlino County surrounding the City of Rancho Cucamonga. For example, elements of a source reduction awareness program might include public 331 ICS FNf.WEFRS - service messages on radio or television stations; advertisements and press releases might be included in publications with a circulation covering several jurisdictions. Both of these examples would make it worthwhile for the jurisdictions N [he target region to combine them efforts for these elements of their programs. • Public acceptance. The public would support an education program. • $gcipl rt< n i ' Education is a means to increase social responsibility in individuals, making them more aware of source reduction and recycling opportu- nin: Evaluation of awards and public recognition includes the following criteria: • Effectiven ss of the oroeram. No diversion occurs directly as a insult of this program. However, the effectiveness of other diversion programs should in- crease. • u ~ rds acsnrLte~ wiL t_IFe oroeram. No environmental hazards are created by this alternative. • Abrhty to accommodate ch=gee. This alternative easily adapts to new circum- stances within the City. Programs for public recognition, local pride, and environmental awareness can all be readily changed ip their focus, scope, and intensity m accommodate changes ip local waste management programs, changes in the waste stream, seasonal variations in waste charactetistlcs, and other faMOrs. • ConseauencPS to the waste Rt_ream. No consequences ate identifiable. • Timin¢. This alternative can beunplemented in the short-term planning period. 332 SCS ENGINEERS - • tieed for extended or new facili~. This alternative requires no facilities. • h-insistency with local policies plans and ordinance . This altemative presents no direct conflicts with torten[ policies, plans, and ordinances. • Institutional barriers to implementation. There are no barriers to implementation of this altemative. • CQSt of unplementation. This alternative involves publicity and public relations costs associated with awarding recognition and highlighting specific activities within the community, most likely taking the form of printed publicity. Some of the exposure necessary for these kinds of recognition programs can be gained for free in the form of press coverage of officially sanctioned events sponsored by the City. If awards or prizes of any inherent value are planned (e.g., cash awards), these costs would need to be considered also. • Avaiab~ty of ma_rkeLs/end-uses. Markets ate trot requved for this alternative. • rating. experienSg. Awards and recognition for source reduction activities are not currently common practice. • $geion~l app . •b'l;ty. Public recognition pmgtams may be app~opriatelyunple- mented over a regiopal area encompassing more that one jurisdiction. For exam- ple, aregional recognition program for businesses implementing source reduction might include public service messages on radio or television smtions; awards, announcements, and press releases might be included in publications with a circulation coveting several jurisdictions. Both of these examples would make it worthwhile for the jurisdictions N the target region to combine their efforts. • Public acceptance. REnyc recognition programs arc an accepted means of gener- ating public support for, and greater awareness of, efforts contributing to a high- 3-37 .C$ ENGINfEFS - profile community campaign. This is a common tactic in campaigns focusing on health and welfare issues, such as blood drives, donations for homeless and indigent citizens, and support for populations such as children or the elderly. Attempts to achieve source reduction would fmd a high degree of pubGe accep- tance. • Social responsibili[_v. Awards and public recognition wi11 increase public aware- ness in targeted areas. Evaluation of nonprocuremeot source reduction programs includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the oroeram. The waste generation study does not provide waste data for the individual City govetttmeotal offices and operations. However, the effectiveness of source reduction programs outlined above may be anticipated to be mirtirttal. • Hazards associated with the nroeram. No environmental hazards are associated with this alternative. • Ability to accottunodate change. 'i2ds alternative is readily adaptable to change. In-house source reduction policies and programs for the City can easily be altered to acwmmodate changes in available source reduction technologies and processes (procurement programs), changes N [he waste sttwm itself (shifts N the ratio of paper to plastic, etc.), and changes in the emphasis of various source reduction programs. • Con uences to the waste stream. A minimal effeM is anticipated. • Timm This alternative can be implemented within the short-term planning period. 3-34 SCSFNGINEERS- • Need for expanded or new facilities. 'T'his alternative requires no facilities. • Consistency with local pQGcies plans and ordinanc 'T'his alternative presents no direct conflicts with current policies, plans, and ordinances. • Institutional barriers to implementation. No institutional barriers are associated with this alternative. • Cost of implementation. The costs of this alternative are not known. However, the primary cost will be for staff time to develop and implement a source reduc- tion policy and program for the City (estimated 40 to 120 hours), Administration might consist of 20 to 40 hours annually. Some costs will be incurred in prepar- ing and disseminating informational materials to staff, perhaps N the forth of pamphlets or flyers posted at appropriate places N the worlgrlace. Other signifi- cant costs might be incurred if, for example, all copying machines were to be replaced with double-sided copiers. • Ava=labdity of marketsiend-uses. Markets ate not required for this alternative. • Qosratine ex rience. Ertvimnmentally sensitive procurement policies are already in place in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • RSyjorut aoodcability. There are no particular advantages to a regional approach to this alternative. • pubic act:eotance. There is no reason to believe the public would not support nonprocurement source reduction policies, as long as they did not waste excessive amounts of taxpayers' money. • $oCL reyyonsibility. All City Departments would be [twined regarding appropri- ate source reduction tahniques. 3-35 Renulatorv Program SCS ENGINEERS - Evaluation of adopting govemment procurement policies includes the following mteria~ • Effectiveness of the oroerarn. The waste generation study does not provide waste data for the individual City government offices and operations. However, the effectiveness of source reduction programs outlined above may be anticipated to be minimal. • Haza_nds ascn_ciated with the oroetam. No environmental hazards are anticipated by implementation of this alternative. • Ab~tyto accommod?te c ae. This altenatve is readily adaptable to changes N available source reduction technologies and target materials. As newer types of products and packaging that an "environmentally sensitive" become available, this alternative will allow the City to take advantage of them through its procure- moot process. • onRe en s to the w -ten gym. The overall effect on the waste stream composition is expoeted to be miaimal. • Timine. This alternative can begin to be implemented relatively quickly (in the short-term planing period), although full implementation will require the development of a detailed policy which identifies target materials, product criteria, and suggested product options and alternatives. • Need for new or ez~nded fad ties. No facilities are required for this alterna- tive. • onsist n _y wiCh local i i s Die nd ord' ~n This alteroatlve presents no direct conflicts with current policies, plans,~and ordinances. 3-36 SCS ENGINEERS - • Institutional Barrie to im lementation, purchasing and procurement programs within the City will have to be coordinated in order to achieve citywide source reduction. While purchasing and procurement itself is often centralized within a city's operations, the individual departments receiving or consuming the goods and services must be fu;ly aware of the program's purpose, and must assist in identifying products and materials for which alternatives ate available. • Cost of imDleF"""r'N^^. The exact costs of this alternative ate not known: how- ever, they would be twofold in nature. First, some administrative and staffmg costs would be incurred to design and implement a citywide source reduction procurement program. This might require between 40 and 120 hours of staff time. Second, suitable products meeting source reduction requirements might be higher in cost than existing products and practices. • Av ilab'13Iy of m k td nd-u ^c. Markets are nFx required for this alternative. • Ooetarine ex ti n P. The City of Rancho Cucamonga already has a recycled content procurement policy. Amending it to include source reduction would be relatively simple. ' Rg¢iona~~onur'F.'tl '. There are no particular benefits to the City in a regional approach. ' Pub=c '-^-~eo'=-^-^_^. Then: an- no foreseeable difficulties with the public in amending the existing procurement policy to include source reduction. • 'al ncib'li City departments will have to be educated regarding source reduction methods and techniques. Evaluation of waste reduction plans includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the program. This alternative could have the potential to reduce 3-37 :~ SCS FNG:NEENS - the amounts of waste generated by the commereiaUindusirial sector. The exact amounts of source reduction are not possible to quantify at this time. Hazards associated with [he oroeram. This altemative presents no known environmental hazards; however, programs developed by the individual business could pose environmental hazards and may require environmental review. • 4bili[y to accommodate chanee. This alternative is readily adapted to new source induction techniques and processes as well az to changes N local government source reduction programs and regulations, since actual implemenmtion is the responsibility of the individual business. • on uencPS to the wazte s ream. This alternative provides the motivation for reductions in the waste stream by the target generators, especially in specific waste categories in which the generator is able tounptement programs. The effects upon the waste stream depend upon the materials targeted and their reducibility. • Timine. This alternative is more likely to be implemented in the medium-term (if at all) because of expected resistance from commerciallindustrial waste genera- tors. • Need for pew or expanded fac lilies. '[his alternative has no facility nxryire- ments. • onsist n y with local policies plans. and or~nances. If selected this alternative would require an ordirunce by the City Council m ensure compliance. t r'n~tiot>?t homers to itpplementation. The ability of many businesses to satisfy these goals depends on the City providing services m help the businesses achieve these goals. Such services may include technical assistance for wazte minimiza- 3-39 SCS ENG~rvff RS - tion and source [eduction programs. The business community would probably oppose any source reduction regulations. • Cost of implementation. The costs of this alternative are unknown, Certainly, delegating the requirements of AB 939 to local generators will reduce the City's expenditures, but there will probably be significant investments of staff time and resources. • Availab~ty of market /end-u Markets are not directly required for [his altemative. • rating excerience. This is a new program. • Re¢ional aootirability. Tbere are no particular advantages to implementing this alternative on a regional basis. In fact, it may creau a competitive disadvantage to businesses operating within the jurisdiction. • Public acceot?_ncs. The business community is likely to oppose tltis alternative. • Social rem nsibilitv_. This program would almost certainly raise the awareness of business managers regarding the amounts and typo of waste generated. Evaluation of product bans includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the oro¢tam. Effectiveness is unlmown at this time, and depends upon the products [hat are banned. 3-J9 FN4iNFERS - • F}~zacds associated with the pr9pram. This altemative presents no known environmental hazard. although it is critical tha[ the substitute for a banned product has a lesser environmental impact. • ability to accommodate chanyg. A product ban, while it is in force, cannot easily respond to changes in the mazke[. Addi[ionally, a product ban cleazly forces manufacmrexs. retailers, and consumers to seazch for aitematives. This can take a significant amoum of time. • Ca -^ Fences to the waste stream. A product ban will probably reduce the quantities of the banned profiuct in the waste stream, However, the ban wiU also tend to increase the presence of product substiNtes. • T'tnllne, A product ban can be implemented in the shoo term. However, most communities allow for some period of time for consumers, producer, and retailers to adjust to the effects of the ban, fu additioa, implementing a product ban over a longer time frame rosy allow fcr the opportunity to pursue this alternative in conjunction with neighboring jurisdictions. • N for new or expanded facilities. No facilities are requved for this alterna- tive. • on islyps~with local hoo .ties ulatts alai o ina„r.^r, A Product ban ocdinattce would have to be adopted by the Ciry Councit in order to implement this altema- tivc. • tnai n~tio •! •rriers to "mnlementalon. No insfitutiortai barriers ate presented by this alternative, although there may be legal ramiScations associated with ezctud- ing a product from the market through a product ban. [- 7-40 ..:s' . SCS EN~m. ~~ e neces ve.~vo\ves s~ffoN the desalts st of tNs a\te~tih atR{o4nata tnetcbm`ts~ e C \oca\ ,rne co tov'a\ by osts to em t and QteSent f of a ~°ct ban of a P cnau` e m de`eaoQ, w tti ~Qtem`e~ t~ moan ~° fot ttiis ate d teA tod° ets'~ ~ tbevPtte ". assoc and P mask to con5°mets' I d.n s• ~o ftom ~e k t e bamted o(m acts ~ ce~pOS. maiva and ttte avaiiablUt o~°attP~clabtbty, n n ~ of Hong`' f t\»s a1m 1tnQ\ement a ~ fot 5 nee tednctton of ge bt~d nae moR eff~'i at pnot9 ~ gat Smtes apse \t is of< te:Y,`On \d fives not end ntatK~N ~e socno C ~ttonBa~B ~n~~icitons, if _ impact n bas o met 8~~ o City ° J~ n aitb net$bbo p~sid im8 t~ss~ b QtoS{dm ~ so) tit teststance n t on\'! itnP\etnenitnB e nt naUonaide ~~ aitb St ~ ~wmaitc~~$ tpe on a stateaid n~ b~ cat` \eNpD~• et, hot ~~ chan8es can ~~~c' P P~ and i4tP consnID ,fiey; costs q~~~~fnUY v~t~~ e P~ ct o ets snbsV~n~~efl. ~ a ~e a \e to f • Q~°~s c\tan~gbe~etin8 °f a ~nfam"~fl~teA ~fbe CttY sb~ to ttits ~ o fta invo\ crate a~ to ~en, ~~ng'tf a cOt~nnttY annfa sts tO \a~" t9 tO ~ ~ `,~ ~sn\t in tCS\ ~ ~~\\9 ex~tten~ ~~ mctw- aaa~. have t° ytE.itN on of a'y of f tY~ edn~ c\eatty t~ ~tetttanv6 ve Rgnt~ pOt avai\ab\0 ic8a~~ .nits ~~ ~ ct is pO \onB° ~ fad that the P '- • Hess, dne to '' '. dA\ Evaluation of advance waste disposal fees includes the following criteria: SCS ENGiNEFRS - • Effectiveness of the oroemm. This alternative provides an economic incentive to source reduction by having [he State adopt laws to encourage the purchase of reusable, recyclable, and durable goods, and by avoiding products which do not meet these criteria. • Aa rds a ociated with the nrovram. No environmental hazards are created by this alternative. • Ability to accommodate chanee. As new products and materials are introduced to the marketplace, the Stale will have to detemrine whether these products will require an advance disposal fee. IJetermining which items should be subject to the fee, establishing the level of the fee, and implementing any changes to the fee program will require substantial effort. • on ~ n P to he waste < rcam. This alternative will reduce nonrecyclable packaging and containers, a~ disposable products such as pens, razors, cameras. beverage containers, disposable diapers, car tires, batteries, and appliances N the waste strram. • ~jtpj8g. Implemeotatiop would depend on We program chosen. These programs usually require legislative action, which is a lengthy process. Additionally, deter- mining which products should he subject to the fa, and collecting and setting the fee, are processes that could extend into the medium-term planning period. • Need for expanded or new fzcilities. No facilities are required for this alterna- tive. • Consistency i hy-loc!_po i i of a_ed ord=nance<. Support for State legisla- tion on advance disposal fees would have to be drafted and approved by the City 7-42 -- SCS ENGINEERS - CfAIUCII. • institutional barriers to implementation. This alternative would prove very difficult to implement on a local basis due to the need for evaluation of products to determine their disposal costs, getting agreement on which products to address, fee structure development, getting local governing body agreement, resistance to advance disposal fees from the business rnmmunity, and enforcement issues. Therefore, State support is necessary. • Cost of implementation. Adapting support for State legislation would require 30 to 80 hours of staff time and the time of the City Council to review, amend and adopt supportive policies. • Availability of markct</end-i«<. Markets arc not requited for this alternative. • Qperatina excerience, With the possible exception of automobile tires in certain states (including California), advance disposal fees are not presently utilized in the United States. • Reeional atro icab'lity. This altemative would be more Wcely to succeed if it were implemented in conjunction with several other jurisdictions, to form a fairly large geographical atea covering a witse consumer, retail, and wholesale region. A statewide program to implement advance disposal fees is currently under consideration in California by the CINMB and the legislature. • l'ubtic acceptance. The benefits and equity of this alternative would have to be dearly demonstrated or public acceptance will be minimal. The public would have to understand why speck products are targeted, the fee stmt:ture 'unposed, and the benefits in reduced disposal volumes or toxicilies. • Social reyyonsib~fv, With advance disposal fees, costs of disposal are integrated 3-43 (rOUtiCll. SCS FNG~NFFNS - • Institutional barriers to implementation. This altemative would prove very difficult to implement on a local basis due to the need for evaluation of products to determine their disposal costs, getting agreement on which products to address. fee structure development, getting local governing body agreement, resistance to advance disposal fees from the business community, and enforcement issues. Therefore. State support is necessary. • Cost of impjpmentation. Adopting support for State legislation would require d0 to 80 hours of staff time and the time of the City Council to review, amend and adopt supportive policies. • Availability-pf markets/end-uses. Markets are not required for this alternative. • Oceratine experience. With the possible exception of automobile rues in certain states (including California), advance disposal fees ate not presently utilized in the United Stales. • Rgytpn t .S~b'a.` . This altemative would be more likely to succeed if it were implemented in conjuncfion wiW several other jurisdictions, to form a fairly large geographical area covering a wide consumer, rstail, and wholesale region. A statewide program to implement advance disposal fees is currently under considerafion in California by the CIWMB and the legislature. public a~gptance. The benefits and equity of this alternative would have to be clearly demonstrated or public acceptance will be mitumal. The public would have to understand why specific products are targeted, the fee structure imposed. and the benefits in reduced disposal vo:umu or tozicities. • ~F)Sjat r~,SR~n•ib~tv_. Nith advance disposal fees, cosu of disposal are integrated 3-43 iC2 ENGINEERS - into the product cost. Therefore, it is up to the consumer to seek the most economical altemative. Evaluation of land use and development includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the nroetam. The impact of this altemative depends on the types of land use targeted by the program (commercial, industrial, or residential) and the types of materials to be affected by the source reduction programs. • Hazards associated with the oroeram. Ttus altemative has no environmental hazards associated with it. • Abi.ty to accommodate chanee. This altemative should be able to accommodate changes that may be necessary to the regulations that stipulate program require- ments for source reduction, as well as changes N the waste stream due to new products, processes, consumer behavior, or source seduction technologies. •C nseauences to the wa<te <tream. The use of source reduction methods at new development sites will insult m decreased contributions of construction debris to the waste strram. • ?'ioinz. This altemative can be implemented in the shoot-term; however, 'unpacts on the waste stream will occur gradually over time as new developments and businesses implement the necessary programs. • Need for new or expanded facilities. No new facilities are requited. • Con<i<tency with local mLcies. Dlan< EEd o finances. The City Planning Deparunent has aheady adopted a planning onlinance relating to the establishment of development criteria for recycling facibties within the industrial area of the City. 'fie City is currently investigating the extension of these policies to include 3-44 iNGINFFRS - the requirement that recycling be taken into account when planning new facilities. including businesses and commerciaUindustrial developments, • Institutional barriers to implementation. There are no institutional barriers to implementing this altemative. • Cost of implementalion. The costs of this altemative are unknown. However. costs will include staff time necessary to develop and administer the regulations (an estimated 80 to 160 hoursl. Monitoring may require 40 to 80 hours annually. • Av . ab' Ily of markets/end-uses. Markets are not required for this altemative. • Qp~rating e~lgrience. No known programs are currently in operation. • ~yjonat anon_~biti_tg, This alternative could be implemented throughout a larger geographical area, such as the County. Any planning efforts probably should include multijprisdictlonal government agencies or a regional task force with broader authority. This approach would prevent highly divergent policies toward growth within one geographic region. • Public acceofance. Opposidoo may be expected fmm land developers, the cham- ber of commerce, and the business community. • dial reyponsibility. Potential business managers seeking to locate in the City of Rancho Cucamonga area would have to think early about how they plan to manage waste materials coming fmm their facility. Evaluation of 5nes and penalties includes the following cr'teria: • Fffec Iveness of r~om¢~. 71ris altemative is actually designed to support other source reduction alternatives. Fines and peoaltles can be very effective 3-45 SCS ENGINEERS - because they impose a fee on waste generators who do not participate in waste reduction efforts. thus providing an economic incentive to develop and implement a source reduction plan. • Hazards associated with the oroeram. No envitnnmental hazards am associated with this alternative. • Ability to accomm~xi,?tP ~ti•noP, Fines and penal[ies could be added or reduced ancording to changes in the specific pmgtams they are designed to support. • Co_ ncgguences to the wa to cite Carefully implemented programs will reduce the amount of solid waste disposed of a[ landfills. Changes in the waste stream composition mill depend on the [ypes of materials targeted for [eduction, and also on the availability of alternative ptnducts. The most likely materials targeted for [eduction ate disposable paper and plastic items for which there are alternatives (for example, ceramic mugs and dinnernare), paper and corntgated cardboard packaging, plastic packaging material, and other packaging products. • ?~>ne. This alternative could be implemented as programs are adopted. • tieed for erpanMA or~w fas'ttitie<, No facilities are required for this alterna- tive. • on is Pn y wiL__ h Ios•t poLisiec olanc a~tt o i • ^PC, (Trt(inances would have to be adopted by the City Council in order to implement this alternative. • Inctimtion?t ba_m,.;grs to imp[ m n [ion. Implementing a program to penalize noncompliant waste gettetators would probably mean the involvement of more than one governmental entity within a jurisdiction. For example, the public agency collecting the fees (the ux assessor) might be different from the agency tracking waste generators. This could delay implementation and lead to addition- 346 SCS ENGINEEPE - al cos[ and administrative burden. Some degree of coordination between public agencies would be necessary. • Cost of ~lementation. Potentially, this program could rvquve 120 to 160 hours of staff time for development and an additional 120 to 160 hours for admuvstration. The costs to businesses required to evaluate [hev waste streams and develop and implement source reduction programs cannot be determined at this time. Ava7abuty of marketslend-uses. Marknts are not required for this alternative. • gpew[Ln¢ exceriensr. There are no known programs involving local govern- ments faring waste generators for excessive waste generation. • Regional aonLc~btyty. From a commercial perspective, fines and penalties could curate an ecorromic disadvantage to local stores compared to other businesses operating outside the jurisdiction. • Public aeceotanee. Membew of the public would probably resist any form of fines or penalties, especially if they were the ones being assessed. • .C~~~msmnsibltity. The financial incentive to reduce the amounts of waste pro- duced would be on waste producers. Viable source reduction and recycling alternatives would have to be offered. SL'VLbIARY OF FUNDING REQUIRID Implementation costs and staff time requirements are summarized in Table 3-l. 5-47 SCS ENG~~NEEpS - SELECTIOti OF PROGRA,1iS Reasons for Choosing Selerred `It rnativ - Program selectioo decisions are based upon discessions with City staff and the apparent applicability of each alternative to Rancho Cucamonga's speciFic circumstances. In general. alternatives that appeared to have the greatest diversion potential and that a ppeared to be most cost-effective were selected. The selection process eliminated progrars which would hinder economic development in the City, require major changes in the billing stmcture for chazging refuse collection fees, or impose unnecessary burdens on waste generators or haulers. Table 3-2 summarizes which programs were or were not selected and provides implementation schecules. Derails of the selection process follow below. Existinrt Yra _ ~ •{r cs ~ppl' nce Re0.Lr how The existing programs including thrift shops, appliance repair stores, and diaper services expect to continue operations throughout the planrt(ag period. While the City does not have direct control of these types of facilities, the City will devise methods to quantify the waste diverted. For more details, please refer to the Education and Waste EvaiuatioNWaste Mini- mization alternatives, Quantity-Rased Variable a r e r . ~ This program was selected for medium-tetra consideration. It was selected because the commerciallindustrial waste stream is the largest portion in Rancho Cucamonga. It is selected fo: medium-term consideration to allow time to address concerns from the business community and to make anticipated changes to the operating procedures of the waste haulcrs. 3-4g S/ EE0. G~~ i'~ ~SL Q"~~ .`,~z ~ '~`S La a.S J\t. a~d~l `.~~ ~`ii. s`a~a \~` `soo `' J\J~, ° ~\~ oJ`¢,co se `„ete-~z°` ~o p Svs`Z~` ~foc~ z~zao z iotcV \\zc~~o ~ as\f ~ s ` at`a~fe~t aa~`~sz,~ye~a`~azaco C~t, a`\< ncp is z 0 o~.z\ ~ a~~ ~\az6 00 ~Sv Q\° ~'`S a t``c~ ` Jaot`t "`z aasy S Jsz 3~\``i `~~`c3`~o o t. o~~ `J~ne ~ooc~ . S,~a oe~a \` ~~ ~c~\, J\i ~b ~z as a~a z ~eS~ t\oat` std `~ a y t ~J ~`cz \a tp ~ .`Jt'J `o `~ae ~ ~f; '~ ~J`~,~ ty ya `aoJ ~`~00 `ag~l~ yep zii e~, rz tc`a zO c` ~e\oQ a~~ o~F J\ ets \er` arm ~\z ~ i~e~Q z c .o a FQ .o ~Oz \a at` ~~ yooo a~ f°t ` ec,J~z rti,AtV-z z a,~ ~o ``S ~,~ o° \~ a \s S \arF ~y ' ors O~ `en~~ ~e s~ as`z n toy ors coJ ~ fot~ ~, oQ" i SY,~ ~a~ `da`' tae d Jc~`° T``SQ zS eii a \~S aS~fz Q\'~ i`a, ¢t~" ~j,~a cz c~ a\ a \s a~ ~ `p~ .,V term eJ~ o ~S o sod c so° ~ JsS izz . r~eA boa ror' \es etc, oto ~~ .sJ ~' a~ `S,~J .1+ t `.cz s of S`Q toss ,legs c `o aV er'~~ l~ i• fo age o`~e ,oJS G`~y opts a vafo \~~eA `,~e s~ ~.oe ~ e c 's`~ '~ s`~r~ orb' tots eo~tr ~q i, e ~ coteQ t s s aF its fzs \`esa .`oo, 4te'~ ,~.prz cog aor` SofQ ~`S a ` z<' a S`e a a ~ data ~`e o `o o ~Qr ____aay .~ a N~~e s a b~ ~ °"o ~i4 ~ sS ` Ss aQ ~ r ~ t~ . ae F oz:?a~`aaJ z co°\ of\rc se N° o\a~~ e aso° e sz teS~ ~g ~~z ~`s`ases~`a.Ob~Ssa9 C aa~J or`err a~eitoF t~te~ ~~l\e~ ~~ ~,~c~ ae~ d~ ,oe S~ ~ata ' a°\zt ~ ot` c~ toV~`" iota 0~~0~''1 h zts. ~eC ~teA R,tr a`, cao\z~ o~\ ~i°t ~~ ~a Gos a ~ s '~~ s ~ atJ ~gs~'o `~l~z r` ,ata coF coS~cf a ~a/ *********************** caRREcTio~ C~RRECTIaN *********************** SCS ENGINEERS - Quantity-Bawd Variable Rates for Households This altemative was not selected at this time because there is no standard-size refuse Container currently in use and because necessary enforcement would be difficult. This option will be reexamined if the City considers an automated collection system with standardized wntainers that would make administration easier. Loans Lan Guarantees Grants and Contributions This prograrn is selected for implementation in the medium-term planning period. City staff feel their efforts could be effective in attracting grant or loan money. This altemative wiL be aimed at applying for Recycled Market Development Zone status and obtaining other grants and funding as these options become available. Evaluatiorss/Waste Vtinimbation This altemative is selected for the short-term planning period due to its anticipated effecrive- ness in diversion, comparative ease of implementation. and potential effect on the commer- cial/industrial waste stream. This alternative could provide a better insight into the commerciaUindustrial waste streartt. It represents a method of inetr;asing awareness among the business community and the waste hauler while providing some rough baseline numbers for the City to allocate source reduction diversion credit. This study could also be used to supplement the commerciallindustrial variable rate program descritxd above. Backvard Comtwstin¢ Prv¢tams Backyard composting has been selected for the short term as a source reduction program because it is acost-effective method for removing yani waste from the residential waste ]-49 SCS ENG~NEFNS - stream. The City will implement a technical assistance program and include information on backyard composting in the public education program. In the beginning, a survey of all homeowners will be undertaken to determine existing backyard composters, estimates of the amount of material diverted, and the level of interest from homeowners who do not currently compost. Educational Efforts Existing education and Public Information programs will be continued and augmented N the short-tern planning pedod and will target all producers of wastes. Increased focus will be placed in three key areas: • Public education about source teducdon techniques and methodologies. • Implementation of source reduction techniques. • Methods of quantifying source reduction in the commerciaUindustrial sector. F~ucational efforts are designed to support source [eduction activities and are considered a key alternative. A funkier discussion is provided in the Education and Public Information Component of this SRR Element (Section '7). Awards and Public Reco¢nitiao This program wW be developed in the short-term planning period and will serve to recognize businesses or individuals for their rxycling and/or source reduction activities. \onytrocurement~our+ce Reduction Pro¢ntns by tl!e City C~overo_ent This program will be implemented N the short-term planning period and will target materials in the local government's waste streams. These activities will be developed and expanded and will serve as a model for commerciaUindustrial waste generators. This alternative will allow the City to take the lead in providing examples for source [eduction. 3-50 S~plementin¢ City Government Procu ent Policies SCS ENG W FERS - This program will be implemented in the short-term planning period in conjunction with the current "CFC reduction" procurement policy. The main focus of this pmgram will be to reduce City Government waste generation or supplement recycling markets by including products which have greater durability, are reusable, have minimal packaging, and recycled material content. R'aste Reduction Planc This alternative was not selected because of possible negative effects on the local business community. The objectives of this alternative are sufficiently addressed in the Waste Evaluation/Waste Mutimizatioo alternative described above. Any formalized pmgram would be a last resort option should diversion goals fall short. Product Baas This alternative was not selected because the effective design and implementation is beyond the scope of the Ciry. Any effective product bans would have to be at least regional, if not state or nationwide. Advance Waste D~trosal Fees This alternative was not selected because it is impractical on a local level. If the State were to adopt advance disposal fees, then such a program might be feasible. Land tine and Development This program was selected for further investigation. it will target municipal waste during the planning stages of new constmction projects and will make developers and business managers attentive to solid waste reduction and diversion methods and encourage them to include these 3-51 SCS ENGINEERS - factors N then facility planning. Should diversion efforts fali shop, the City may consider mandatory progruns. Fines and Penalties This progmm is not selected for implementation. Fines and penalties would be difficult to establish, enforces and administer and should not be necessary. However. should diversion goals fall short, the City may reconsider this alternative. FORECAST DIVERSION Because so little data has been maintained in the past, it is difficult to accurately project specific amounts of waste reduction for each of the selected alternatives. One of the objectives of the source reduction pmgtam is to establish adequate monitoring methods to quantify future source [eduction. However, as a goal, Rancho Cucamonga expects to achieve 1 percent source reduction N the short term and 3 percent source reduction in the medium term. Through the combination of all selected alternatives, this would amount to 1,785 tons in 1995 and 6,399 tons in the year 2000. PROGRArt IMPLEhIF.rNTATTON The implementation of the selected alternatives, including designation of the persons or agencies responsible, tasks to be undertaken, time schedule, and funding required is presented in Tables 3-3 [hroug6 7-11. The Engineering Department has the primary responsibility for implementation and coordination of source reduction activities. The Engineering Department will need the coopeation of the commercial and residential waste generators and the haulers in carrying out the various tasks. Existing Alternatives Existing source reduction activities such as thrift stores, diaper services, and appliance repair 3-52 _ S6FNGWEERS- shops will be encouraged to expand. Methods wilt be established to quantify the amounts and types of materials diverted through these activities. Quantity-Ba_~d Variable Rates for om_erciaLr d trial BusinescwR Ibis program is selected for medium-term implementation. Program development entails a study to determine a rate stmemre which will encourage businesses to undertake source reduction activities. Implementation costs will involve program design, educational mater.- als, and perhaps additional storage or wllection equipment. Loans. Loan Cuanntees Grants and Cortnbutions This alternative will be directed towards applying for grants and loan programs relating to recycling projects. Examples will include the application for grants or loan guaruttees from the CIWMB as it relates to the Recycled Market Development Zones. Waste Fvaluationa/Wacrr ~ i ' t' This alternative requires coopemtlon from business owners and or managers to work with the City Manager's Office and the waste hauler to conduct waste audits designed to determine what types of wastes are generated, and how they may be source-reduced or recycled. Sac and Comtaostina 'T'his alternative will involve determining the scope of the program and the type of technology to be used for effective backyard composting. Initially, the City will begin with a residential survey. This survey will focus on who is currently composting, estimates of amounts composted, and who might be interested m initiating backyard composting in then house- holds. 3-53 SCS FNGINEFPS - Educatiwal Efforts Educational programs the City currently undertakes will be continued through the shor- and medium-term periods. For a detailed summary of the Implementation Schedule for Educational Efforts, please refer to the Education and Public Information Component (Section '~ of this SRR Element. Awards and Public tx 'e This program is designed to be tolled out slowly over the short- and medium-term planning periods. A significant amount of time will have to be devoted by the Engineering Depart. ment to evaluate the performance of businesses and individuals and to develop the criteria for the awards. In addition, the time and location of the presentations will have to be evaluated. Vpmmrrocurement ~nurce Reduction Pro Implementation involves determining what additional source reduction activities will be effective, how existing programs may be supplemented, and then educating local govenuent employees about these options. Suumlement'~ itv v of rem nt Po • 'es This program involves the design of an effective, implementable program. It is entvely dependent upon the City government to adopt it. LAnd nn.i 710 1 This program wi :voluntary in nahtre. The City Planning Department will examine existing standards and encourage designers and builders of new sttvemres to take recycling into account. ~~ 3-54 VfO.`rTTORII•iG A:\'D EVALUATION SCS ENGINEEPS - This section explains huw the selected programs will be monitored and evaluated to assure that source reduction programs ate operating effectively. Continual monitoring and evaluation is necessary to measure the success of selected programs and to provide a measure by which adjustments can be made to increase program effectiveness if diversion goals are not met. To evalua[e implementation of the source reduction programs, the City will use the following criteria: • Success in meeting source reduction diversion goals. • Implemenmtion of source reduction programs as scheduled. • Development of monitoring procedures to measure source reduction achieved. While the City will monitor aU of the selected alternatives on an annual basis to assess whether programs are being effectively implemented, the City intends to quantify and take credit for increases m source [eduction levels at the end of the short- and medium-term planning periods. The methods outlined below will be used to monitor implementation of source reduction programs. I-ocal Government Pro:ramv The Frigineeting department will prepare annual reports describing whether tasks ate being implemented as scheduled, and the extent to which implementation has led to reduced waste generation or increased purchases of targeted materials. Technical Assistance I'rvarvms The Etgineering department will survey local commercial and residential generators to determine their familiarity with City programs (public education, achievement awards, 3-55 iC5 ENGINEERS - backyazd composting, etc.) provide information about these programs fif needed), and solicit feedback at City-sponsored events (workshops, seminars, etc.) to determine inteFCSt in these programs. The City and its waste haulers will also assist businesses interested in conductin¢ waste audits. / Reeu a[oty Proeramc The Engineering department aill prepare an annual report indicating whether tasks have been implemented as scheduled and describing the measures implemented through the application of regulatory programs. Contingency :lleasurrs-- Should the effectiveness of source reduction activities fall short of the goals, then the Engineering department will investigate all available alternatives to inc[easing awareness and participation in source reduction activities. Available alternatives may include: • Refu»rEg and enhancing designated source reduction programs. • Instituting a fines and penalties system. • Mandatory source reduction programs. ' Banning of certain materials, products, business activities. • Developing a variable rate sWCt~are for residences. 3-56 SCS ENGINEERS - TAELE 3•L DIED tQ(11GNAM SUMMdRY Program Cost (S) Stag Time to Implenrnt Stott Time to Maintain Evsting Programs 0 '_0 - 40~ 40 - 80 Variable Rates - Conun<rciaL'Induslrial 59.000 - 84,000 80 - 120 40 - 80 Variable Rates -Households 63,500 - 88,500 80 - 120 40 - 80 Loans. [.om Guunuteu, Grano and Contributions l20 - 160 120 - 160 W'uro Evalmtious/Wute Niaimiatioo j = qp - g0 Backyard Composting Programs 5.400 - 59,400 80 - 120 RO - 120 Filucational Efforts j j 1 full-lime AweEda and Public Rsagnition t j $ Yooptocurement Source Reduction by City Gov<rvment j qp - 120 20 . qp Supplementing City Government Procurement Policies k 40 - 120 20 - 40 Advance Wule Diapovl Ems $ j j Product Boos F x Y Land Cx sad Development 0 80 - l60 40 - 80 Fine and Peoaltia 0 120 - 160 120 - 160 Tt7tA[S 127900.131,900 J60 •960 520 -840 • Includes time to develop quaotifintioo rystem in order that We City may deteEmine diversion. Depends upon xope of program. 7-57 SCS ENGINfFRS - rastEt2 SEI.ECF'fOl•I AND IMpl.EMENCArtON OF PROGAAM14S Program Sdated? Time to hnplanentation Existing Programs Yes Shart-term Quentin-Based ~"ariable Retm - Commerciilrlndustriil Yn Medium-krm QuntiN-Based Variable Rum - Households Yo -- Loins, Loin Guarmten, Grmts, and Contributions Ym Nedium-term Waste Evaluationsi wask Ninimintiaa Ym Short-term Backyard Composting Programs Yn Short-lean Educationil EffoN Ym Short-term Awatds and Public Raogoitioo Ym Short-term Nonpracurcmeot Source Reduction by City Government Ym Shart-krm Supplementing City Government Procurctnmt Policim Ym Short-krm wink Reduction Plain No -- Product Gam No - Advm« Waste Dispoail Fm No - I-md L'se and Development Ym Short-term Finn and Ptnnltim No - 3-58 ~ ~ ~ 9O O - ~ V M ~ ~ ~ a ~ '~ ,~ s Y ~ z z a ~ ~ s ~ ~ m u~ ti € r ~ a ` < : y d 3 3 ~ g ~ o ~ m ~ u ~ m m F~ u ~ _ c~ c a 9 ~ yv E 9 y 0 V ("' S O ~ .~ ~ a ~. p i p 0 9 ~ g ~ y 3 b 3-59 i ~ ' ~ Y Y ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ L - j ~ '~ _ 2 2 _ u j ~ o o w N u ~ z l G x x h ,, ~ H w _ _ J e < a C C ~ v X X ~' n a F `G m c w o ao m ~ m g ,~ 3 $ $ ~ c ~ 0 Y ~ :~ E 'm 'S m ~ eo ~ m u NN N ~ pP~ `~' ~ N 4 a C W .<~ ~ f fi m F Y ~ ~ ~ `~ r ~ ~ Y - 5 .. ~ ~ y 9 B y ~ ~ y' 9 ~ e y ~ C T ~ ; tl x ' ~ _ s ?' ~ g 5 ~ ~ e a ~ ~ $ ~ E @ ~ ~ ~ 2 Y O Y Y 3 a ~ ~ i E e o. 8 k 3-60 m E a 8 0 3.61 i i I 3 ~e a ~ I i ~ `_ i0 Q ~3 n S i `,Y' r O ~ ~ F _ v Y ~ v ~ T ~ ~ ~ i ~ a Lk ~ .. G ° C e C c eo y c ~E m ~ 'm u5 `h m ~ 8 ` = ~ ~; m< x 8 m L L ' ` ~ 3 C pp L L d 5 m mS ~ 5 5 :~ E i ~ 3 ~ N O r a T - m C .7 L. o ~ ~ C 4 f~ ~' O ep0 U e ~ yy d T f ~ 2 RR~ i °o C O 3 d u p ~ 5 ~ ~ .. s p 55 ~ '~ 3 n G ~ 9 '~ 7 ~ 0 U W e e a `o M 3-62 9 'v' V ~ F. '0 3 z ~ a > ? n ~i w z' u z_ :J ~ L ~n 6 C K C ~ ~ ~ ~ y ^ ~y 1 p yy G.1 yy O pp C CO ~ C 4 C ~ G ° .9 . .5 v ~ 8 a. ~ u5 ~9 ~5 u5 u 9 i} ~~ V m + ~ 1 ' y 7S: ~ $ ~ ~ m ~ g~ 1 ~ c m 3 e s ~ ~ g g ~ 5 ~ 9 y 5 F ~ ~ 8 9 ~ ° 8 00 a g8 r ~ 9 6 ~ m a s ~~ 3 s 9 b dS~ ~ o 3-63 ~ ~J ~ ~ Y~ L ~ { A D y^ '~ ` N ~ n ! a >' k c e t t L v °' ,~ $ A c X t L '~0 G Y N 3 < a ~ E # ~ ~ z ~ .~ ~ ~, c s 5 :~ ~ ~ J ~ c0 ~ w ~ m ~ _ E,~ = m ~ C ~ . ~ ~ C T T _ O a P n s K 6 ` y Y] ] ~ q J 9 q C p A L}~ PS spV~ L 3 p wC y ~ E" ~ `o ~ c 3 E~ 7 1 `0 r 'o y _ a E 3 _ ~ ~ a d w n m ~ 'c ` m'C Z T ,'t' ~i X 3-64 ~ 3 c ~ 9 8 `s _ V o Tom, 3 3 I ~ ~ iC i ~ u F ~ L ~ N ~ ~r V ~ ^a `" C Tj ~ ~ G u C O ~ ~ . G G W C C Itl ~ a e ., ~ O ~ fi ~ ~ ~ f .~ g a ~ a ~ 3-65 `o 9 y u 7 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ 3 9 sl x ~ c ~ n X g 9 9 9 ~ Y t e a ~ ~ E ~+~ > .~ g m m m ~~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ m o F ,~ t 4 ~ ° 9 Pt i L~ s a `~ m ~ ~ f a' u D F U E y m~ a ~ a , 0 9' ~ s g ~ .~ G ~ ' °e 5 ~ ` ~ O ~ 3 g ~~ ~~ ~-~ o` .= 3 e~' ~ u U e O J 'o ~` ~ 5 °' 8 ~ a m m ~~ ~ ~ ~ r r u v F ~ 3 ~ e a m .`3 9 5 8 ~ '~ .~ 8 F 5 Q S ~ 3-67 $CS FNGINFFRi - SECTIOY 4 RECYCLING COMPO~'Er"I' This component addresses recycling as those activities which remove material from the waste stream for manufacturing new products. All basic design elements of the recycling programs are addressed, including administration, materials handling (separation, collection, and marketing), promotion education, and fmancing. GOALS A.~D OB.IECTIVFS Table 4-1 shows the short- and medium-term recycling goals established for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Based on the data from the Waste Generation Smdy for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the following objectives have been established for the shoR- and medium-term planning periods: • Expand pdot curbside recycling program (in plan sincc May 1991) to serve all single-family households by January 1993. • Develop and implement multifamily recycling program by January 1993. • Initiate officerinstitutional recycling programs by January 1992. • Modify City zoning and building codes to requite space for recycling containers by Tune 1992. 4-1 SCS iNGINEECS - • Participate in planning of a regional multijurisdictional materials recovery and processing facility to be developed by January 1995. • Jfodify purchasing procedures to increase the markets for recyclable materials by June 1992. • Expand the number of materials collected N the curbside program by January 1995. • Expand commercial/industrial recycling programs to accept additional materials and insure that all appropriate establishments are being serviced by January 1995. The types of materials identified by the Waste Smdy to be included in the recycling program include newspaper, mixed waste paper, office paper, corrugated cardboard, ferrous and nonferrous metals, glass, and plastics. In addition, wood waste, batteries, used motor oil, construction demolition debris, and some appliances can also be recycled. E.sQSTLNG CONDITIONS Current Diversion Prog{y~g The information regarding torten[ diversion activities m Rancho Cucamonga was developed from data gathered during the Waste Generation Smdy conducted by SCS Engineers. This information was compiled from a variety of sources. The State of California Department of Conservation provided information regarding materials received at AB 2020 deop-off centers and regional buy-back centers. :Major commercial and industrial firms (thou employing l00 individuals or more) were contacted through survey fortes or telephone calls. Recycling cen- ters located in the general area were contacted, although then centers were generally unable to provide information relative to the percentage of materials received from any particulaz jurisdiction. The commercial waste stream was investigated through contacts with shopping a-2 SCS ENGWFER$ - centers and malls, az well as large chain operations. Unfortunately, few generators maintain clear records on the actual amounts of materials involved. A pilot residential curbside recycling program has been in place in Rancho Cucamonga since Jfay 1991. Also, since January 1989, a voluntary drop-off progam has been in effect in the City. In addition, City Hall has developed and implemented a successful office paper recycling program. This plan has served as a model for other government offices and institutions. The SCS Waste Generation Smdy noted a high percentage of film plastic (supermarket bags) and California Redemption glass in the waste stream; both should be targets of furore recycling efforts. Sunilarly, with approximately one third of the commercial waste stream consisting of paper and paper products, specific plans should be developed for diverting those materials. More than 20 percent of the industrial waste stream in Rancho Cucamonga is currently being diverted. '['his is among the highest rates of the cities in the coalition, and somewhat higher than most average communities. The commercial waste stream is dominated by a large presence of wood and concrete. 'This indicates a considerable amount of conswetion activity. Programs should be developed to divert this kind of construction waste. Rancho Cucamonga is fortunate to have three active franchised haulers anxious to work with the City to develop and implement programs to achieve the AB 939 goals. COtiCLCSIONS The existing waste diversion rate is defined az rho arnouot of wazte diverted pcr year divided by the total amount of waste generated pet year. Based on the infonnafion fmm the Waste Genemtion Study, the annual amount of solid wazte diversion was 12,400 tons. q'ith 148,080 tons of total waste generated, the diversion rate is 8.4 percent. 4-3 SCS ENGINFFFS - tising the conversion factor of 1,600 pounds per cubic yazd to describe the composite density of diverted materials, it is estimated that the in-place annual volume of materials diverted from the landfill is 15,500 cubic yards. Wastes currently diverted in Rancho Cucamonga, as documented from the sources described, are shown in Table 4-2. Anticioated Decrease in Recvcl~Y Activities It appears that the curbside recycling program may have some effect on local and regional recycling centers when the program is expanded citywide. However, in many cases the increased awareness due to the high visibility of residential curbside collection stimulates recycling activity ta all programs. Changing habits in the home makes i[ easier to adapt to new recycling programs offered N the school or workplace. The net effect will be an overall increase in recycling. Proenms or Activities Providltta Markets for Recycled Materials The City does support the "California Redemption" program which provides residents with an economic incentive to return beverage containers for cash. The City also has a procure- ment policy for the purchase of recycled products. Additional market development activities the City is considering ate as follows: • Work with local manufacturers to identify opportunities for increasing the use of post-consumer and secondary wastes m their manufacturing or industrial process- es. This effort would complement any recycled product procurement policy and education program. • Establish a consumer awareness campaign with Iocal food stores to promote procurement of recycled products or products in recycled packaging. 4-4 SCS ENGINEERS - Conduct seminars with local businesses and schools on "buying recycled" advertising campaigns in the local media. Impose bans or fees on selected nonrecyclable products and/or packaging made from nonrenewable resources, where altematives are available and economical. EVALUATION OF ALTER:NATIVFS Several recycling program altematives are available ro the City for recovering recyclable material from the waste stream: residential programs, commerciaVindustrial programs, drop- off centers, buy-back centers, mobile buy-back centers, manual material recovery facilities, mechanized material recovery facilities, and landfdl salvaging. Using the following evaluations for each altemative, the City wW select those pmgrams that will be most effective and appropriate to their individual needs. Residential urbsid Proanm This alternative would provide fox the collection of recyclable material from 26,000 single- family residences. Residents are provided containers to handle pre-sorted items or commin- gled material. Recyclables collected with mixed wazte can also be picked up at the curb. Residential curbside programs are most efficient and costtffective in densely populated areas, where routes are concentrated, affording more collection stops per mile. Evaluation of residential curbside pmgtams includes the following criteria: • >=•ff'a+iven-ca of h ~ The estimated amount of disposed residential waste for the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the 1990 calendar year was 65,880; of this, 55,998 tons 185 percenQ were generated by single-family residents. 4-5 SCS ENGINEERS - The following estimates on diversion are provided, based on: - Recycling Implementation Plan -Final Report, City of Ios Angeles. 1989. Actual audit information fmm pilot and full citywide programs in the following California jurisdictions: Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, Sierra Madre. Corona, Rancho Cucamonga, Iafayette, Alamo, Danville, Orinda, Moraga, San Jose, Vista, San Marcos, Escondido, South San Francisco, Brisbane, and Millbrae. It should be noted that the lower capture tats for aluminum and PEI' is based on the assumption that residents will redeem these high-value materials directly for money. Table 4-3 details projected diversion by material type, • Ha~artrc acv,r~ar with t6 plp~, A curbside collection program does not pose any sig~eant environmenW, health, or safety hazards, However, there are some aspects of the program that could be considered objectionable to some residents. These aspects include Wck traffic, noise, arr pollution, and the visual aspect of recycling containers left at the curbside after collection. • Ab~Irp~ to arm mEVtatr rha A curbside collection program can be very adaptable to chamging economic and technological conditions. For example, if certain types of materials becume more or less valuable fmm a recycling stand- point, the program can either add or subtract certain materials fmm the collection process. Furthermore, if processing technologies change, such that the separation of materials can be achieved mom efficiently through automated processes, a commingled collectiom method could replace a two- or three-bin colection system. • Con~uences to the wa to srrram, Art effective curbside collection program will result in a significant reduction in newsprint, plastic, aluminum cans, tin food and x,: 4-6 $C$ ENGMEEA$ - beverage cans, and glass beverage containers entering the waste stream and beine landfdled. As a result, the relative percentage of pu[rescible material would increase in the waste stream. Tim ine. Based upon the experiences of other cities across the United States, implementation of a curbside collection program for a community the size of Rancho Cucamonga can be accomplished in approximately 6 to 12 months. within the short-term planning period. However, this does not include development of a processing facility. • Need for new or expanded facil tie . A curbside recycling program for [he City of Rancho Cucamonga will likely requite development of a material processing facility to receive, separate, crush compact, bale, and prepare the recyclables for market in accordance with the material quality spec cations required. Such a facility can be constntcted to serve an individual city or, in many cases, a regional processing facility can be developed to serve several jurisdictions. One of the City's franchised haulers operates a processing facility which handles material curtendy collected through the present recycling programs, and has the capacity to handle materials collected in the future. • onsist n y wiL local i i c plans. and nrd'naErcPS. Curbside collection of recyclables does not conflict with local policies, plans, or ordinances. A modifi- cation of existing cootraetlfranchise agreements may be required between the City and its haulers. • nc . ;o ai rri rs to imolemen lion. There are no institutional barriers that would prevent the implemention of a curbside collection program. [n jurisdic- tions where a high level of independent scavenging exists, there may be some reluctance due to socioeconomic impacts. • Cost of implemenLnon. There are numerous factors affecting the cost of provid- ing residential curbside recycling, such as the hype and number of materials 4-7 SCS ENGiNFFFS - collected, and whether the materials ate source-separated or commingled. The location of the processing facility wID determine the type and size of collection vehicle (fuel and labor factors). The type and number of residential containers provided is also a consideration. For purposes of evaluation, the following guideline has been prepared. It is based on the assumption that a collection vehicle and one-man crew can serve 1,000 homes per day over a 5-day week. The actual number of stops for collec- tion ranges from 400 to 700. ESTIMATED CAPTTAL COSTS Collection Vehicles (6 (¢T 580,000) S4S0,000 Recycling Containers (28,000 ~ 54.00) l 12.000 5592,000 Amortized over 7 years ®95% 5109,000 ESTIMATID OPERATING EXPENSES Labor - Drivers/Supervision 432,000 Overhead & Maintettattce 216.000 "Coral (Etimated First-Yeaz Costs) 5757,000 • Availability of tttarkets/ettd-uses. The materials to be collected by the curbside collection program include cewsprint, mixed paper, plastic, aluminum cans, tin food and beverage cans, glass, and corrugated cardboard. Cumntly, there is a market for all of these materials through salvage companies that act as brokers, or through tnanufacmters that pushase the materials directly aad use them in their manufacturing processes. Specific buyers of the recycled materials ate provided in Table 4-4. -~ 4-S -- -- SCS ENG:NEENS - Public Acceptance. Residential curbside recycling progmms are as acceptable today as regular trash collection service. Although they take on a wide range of program designs, communities and their citizens are fmding residential curbside recycling programs to be an effective means for helping to meet AB 939 diver- sion goals. If selected, this alternative is expected to be successful N Rancho Cucamonga. • ratine ex~ence. Cutt>side recycling pmgmms have been in place for over 21 years throughout Califontia. New developments and technologies regarding collection vehicles, processing equipment, and facilities provide a foundation to insure the success of future programs. • Re¢ional app icabi iry, A regional processing facility serving several jurisdic[ions would be economical and efficient. Multifamily RExwc inv Pmomm A multifamily collection program typically involves the source separation and collection of recyclable materials such as newsprint, plastic, aluminum cans, tin food and beverage cans. and glass beverage containers from apartment dwellings. This type of program offers the opportunity to recycle in the home for those individuals who live N larger apartment buildings that are not generally served by a residential curbside recycling program. There exist a number of opdops in designing a successful multifamily recycling program. Not all apartment completes are similarly designed. Variables which influence the success of a program include the number of units in a complex, the availability of a location for a "recycling station," the distance from apartments to the recycling area(s), and the number of collections per week. For most buildings, a 90-gallop wheeled cans may be the answer, while for smaller apartmeot buildings (usually 10 units or less), several curbside bins will suffice. In short, program design is not as standardized as residential curbside recycling and will have to be tailored to the specific needs of each complex. 1-9 SCS ENGINEFYS - The City, in conjunction with its franchised haulers, can perform an analysis of the exisline and planned apartment complexes to devse an appropriate program. This can be accom- plished ht the short-term planning period. Evaluation of a multifamily recycling program includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the oroeram, While the Waste Generation Smdy does not provide speck informaion on the amount and characterisics of the multifamily waste stream, figures on total tonnage wets supplied by the franchised waste haulers. The amounts of waste generated were estimated to be 9,905 tons per year. and are included in the "Residential" waste category. In general, participation rates in multifamily dwellings are anticipated to be Iower than in single-family residential programs. To accommodate this assumptioq Ure participation rate for multifamily (50 percent) is assumed to be lower when com- pared to single-family curbside projections. Assuming a participation rate of 50 percent, projections may be made on the effectiveness of a multifamily recycling program based on the current waste generation information {see Table 4-S). cra~,.rtc ac~-~ted with Poe nrnonm, A multifamily residential collection ProB~n does not pose any significant envvonmental, health, or safety harards. however, the program may create minor local traffic problems and may necessi- tale scheduled parking restrictions in the pickup area. ` A. h54p' t a~^^ '" 'r• °~a . This program can be very adaptable to changing ecorromic and technological conditions. As the values of recyclable materials change, the types of materials collected is the program can change. Further- more, as processing tmhnologies improve and become automated, the program can easily change to a commingled collection method. 4-l0 SCS ENGINEERS - • Consequences to the waste stream. Att effective multifamily residential collection program will result N reductions in newsprint, plastic, aluminum cans, tin food and beverage cans, and glass entering the waste stream and being landfilled. Timine. A multifamily residential collection program can be implemented N the short-term planning period, in approximately 6 to 12 months. • :Deed for new or expanded facutiec. A multifamily residential collection pro- gram is generally operated N conjunction with commercial or single-family curbside collection programs and may require a material processing facility to receive, separate, crosh/compact, bale, and prepare the recyciables for markets in accordance with the material quality specifications required. Such a facility can be constructed to serve an individual city or, in many cases, a regional processing facility can be developed to serve several jurisdictions. Consistency with local ;r;rc plant a...t ....±:.,,,~-~~ A multifamily residential collection program for recyclables does not conflict with local policies, plans, or ordinances. A mod cation of existing contract/franchise agreements may he required between jurisdiction and its franchised haulers. Program development must meet existing codes and ordinances, particularly relating to building site and fire codes. • Inctmtion t 'ers to 'mylement?t;on. Them are no institutional bartiers that would preclude a multifamily residential collection program. <n jurisdictions where a high level of independent scavenging exists, them may be some reluc- tance to develop programs due to the socioeconomic impacts they may create. Cost of smpiemenL~on. Due to the fact that threw haulers serve the City, a coordinated effort would be most cost-effective. Assuming [he City of l~arrcho Cucamonga would provide the multifamily collection program to the residents in :';: 4-ll ICS ENG WFE0.5 - conjunction with commerciallindustrial recycling, additional costs for this program are shown below. ESTIMATED CAPTTAL COSTS Collection Vehicles (2 ®580,000) 5160,000 90-Gallon Wheeled Carts (2,500 ®590) 22 5385,000 Amortized over 7 years ~ 9.5~ 5 7!,000 ESTIMATED OPERATING EXPENSES Labor-Driver/Supe[visor 5110,000 Overhead & Maintenance 70.000 Total (Estimated First-Year Costs) _1$.4,444 Szsl,ooo Traditionally, multifamily recycling collection programs require separate, dedi- cated collection vehicles. Vehicles, along with the type and quantity of contain- ers provided to each multifamily complex, are the basis of costs for multifamily programs. Additional costs would be incurred for operating and maintenance expenses. In Rancho Cucamonga, the multifamily programs can be combined with estab- lished curbside collection programs, utilizing existing vehicles. The only addi~ tional costs would he for containers and some labor, and the operating and maintenance costs can then be shared. + Avai1?bifi(y of ma_hMJend-urea. Markets are available for the materials recov- ered in this collection program: newsprint, mixed paper, phzstic, aluminum cans, tin food and beverage cans, glass, and corrugated cardboard. Specific buyers of the recycled materials ate provided in Table 4-4. • FE brie v private ocera ion, The City of Rancho Cucamonga can operate a multifamily program N conjunction with its contract refuse haulers. 4-12 sC5 ENGINEERS - Public acceotance. Although they take on a wide range of program designs. communities and their citizens are fmding that multifamily recycling programs serve as a foundation upon which other waste diversion programs can he devel- oped. blul[ifamily recycling programs will continue to be an effective means for helping to meet the AB 939 diversion goal. If selected, this alternative is expected to be successful in Rancho Cucamonga. nE+erat~ne experience. Many multifamily collection programs are in place throughout Southern California. The City's frurchised haulers operate multifami- ly recycling programs N some of its jurisdictions. Data from these efforts will provide guidance for the development of local progrnms. Reeional arroltcab~iLY~ Processing of collected materials at a regional facility serving multiple jurisdictions is economically prnetical. Cnm_ erciaUlndustrial RecYc ina p['OYI'AN A commercialiindustrial recycling program provides collectlon services for businesses, manufacturers, supermarkets, bars. restaurants, and shopping centers that generate large quantities of uniform waste such as newsprint, high-grade office papers, cortugated cazd- board, aluminum, glass, cottetete, and wood. CommerciaUindustrial businesses are a consistent scarce of fairly contaminant-frce materials that command good market prices. A commercial/industrial collection program is generally operated in conjunction with residential and multifamily collection programs, coordinating the use of vehicles, facilities, personnel. and markets. Once collected, the recyclables are delivered to a processing facility where they are further segregated and prepared for sale to brokers or dirxtly to manufacmrers which use the recyclables as raw material in creating their products. As each business varies, so will the plan for recovering recyclable material. Each program should have a desigrtated in-house coordinator responsible for its implementation an supervision. Once the targeted materials are determined, the size and location of containers 4-13 SCSENGWEEPS- are selected. It is important that both the janitorial service and the waste hauler be im~oPed in the design and implementation of a business recycling program in order to ensure success. Evaluation of commerciaVindustrial recycling includes the following criteria: Effectiveness of the~oroera_ The amount of disposed commerciaL'industrial waste from the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the 1990 calendar year was 63,120 tons. Table 4-6 shows the materials derived from this quantity which are potentially recoverable through a commercial/industrial collection program. By diverting 23,771 tons of recyclables per year from the waste stream through a commerciaUindustrial collection program, the City could achieve a diversion rate of apprcximately (3.0 percent of the total waste stream. • Hazards associated wi n th oro Commercial/industrial collection programs do not pose any significant environmental, health, or safety hazards. However, some programs could create minimal traffic and noise problems, depending on the design. Individual businesses or industries may encounter hazaMs associated with properly storing materials for collection. • ?ki~IY to accomm • P •~a , q commereiaUindustrial collection program is very adaptable to changing economic and technological conditions. The type of materials collected can be adjusted as changes occur N markets, facilities, and/or collection practices. Con~Pe~±uenePS to ° wa t <t a qn effective commeroial/indus[rial collection program will remove newsprint, high-grade paper, metals, comrgated cardboard, aluminum, glass, and concrete from the waste stream. • T~in¢. Commercial industrial collection programs can beunplemented in the short-term planning period. 4-14 SCS FgGINEEgS'-~ • Veed for new or expanded facilities. A commereial/industrial collection program wilt requite a matetia! processing facility to receive, separate, croshlcompact. bale, and prepare the recyclables for sale to markets in accordance with the material quality specifications required. This can be within the jurisdiction or contacted for at a regional point. • Consistency with local pglicies olans and ordinances. A commercialiindustrial collection program does not conflict with any local policies, plans, or ordinances. A mod cation of existing con[art/franchise agreements may be required between jurisdiction and franchised hauler. Modifications N building codes can also insure the necessary storage space for new facilities. • Institutional barriers tovnolementation. There are no institutional barriers that would prevent implementing a commercial/industrial collection program. Howev- er, institutions may design their collection programs in aceotdance with their individual policies. For example, some busintsses may decide to market their own waste materials. In jurisdictions when: a high level of independent scaveng- ing exists, there may be some reluctance to develop programs due to the socio- economic impacts they may create. • o t of 'molemenLLon. For the purpose of evaluating the al[emative, the es[imated costs are as follows: ESTIMATID CAPTTAL COSTS Collection Vehicles: Front-Fnd Loader (2 ®5133,000} 5266,000 Roll-Off Truck (1 ~ 585,000) 85.OIX1 5351,000 4-15 Containers: d0-yard debris boxes i50 C~ 53.500) 2-yard bins (50 ®5325) 3-yard bins X50 ~ 5375) 90-gallon wheeled carts (100 ®580) Arttortized over 7 years at 9.5 ~ Estimated Operating Expenses: Iabor Overhead & Maintenance Total (Estimated First-Yeaz Costs) 5175,000 16,250 18,750 l6 Q~ 5226,000 56 ENGi NEF45 - 5106.000 165,000 1_QS 000 5376,000 • Availab~ of markets/end-uses. Markets are available for the materials recov- ered in this collection program: newsprint, high-grade papers, corrugated cazdboard, aluminum, glass, wood, and cotrcrete. Specific buyers of the recycled materials are provided in Table 4-4. • Public vs private oceration. The City of Rancho Cucamonga could operate com- merciallindustrial recycling programs N conjunction with they authorized haulers. • A.tbLe acceo a~ a. As demonstrated in successful programs nationwide, addition of a commereiallindustrial collection progtttm will incrrase the results of the waste diversion efforts, and help the City to attain the AB 939 diversion goals. • Qpfratine excerience. CommerciaUindustrial recycling has been practiced in the area for many years. New technologies in collection vehicles and processing facilities will insur future success in these programs. • Rsgional aoolica 'I'tv. Processing of materials at a regional facility serving multiple jurisdictions is economically practical. 4.16 Droo-Off Centers SCS ENGINEERS - .4s the name indicates, drop-off centers are repositories for donated recyclable items from the general public, One of the most popular means of recycling in recent years, as well as one ot" the least expensive to operate, drop-off facilities can accept single hems or a full ranee of recyclable materials, Many drop-off centers are maintained by charitable or civic organiza- tions and are unattended. At present, there are periodic newspaper drop-off programs at schools and shopping centers. Evaluation of drop-off centers includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the oro¢ram. Generally, the diversion potential of a drop-off center is limited, as are the types of materials collected. Studies show that convenience and support of sponsoring organisations ate reasons that drop-off centers succeed. • Ha~A+*t~ as~~ •t~ti4~' oroemm. Drop-off centers create no significant envimnmrntal, health, or safety hazards. Occasionally, a dropoff center may create minvnal traffic problems, site noise, and hoer. • Ab'i;ty t~ ac~n m • P han A drop-o(f center can adapt to changing economic and technological conditions. As the value of recyclable materials changes, the choice of accepted materials can also change. Such changes in the acceptance of materials require quite an educational effort, and may take some time to put into effect. • on anew to the waste stte.`m. Drop-off centers will remove a variety of recyclable materials from the waste stream. • 1'imine. With appropriate perrrrita secured. the design and implementation of a drop-off center can be accomplished in 6 to l2 months, the short-term planning 117 SCS ENGINFERS - period. As the need arises, drpp-off centers can easily be expanded to include additional sites and receptacles as well as additional or new items throughout the short- and medium-term planning periods. • Peed for new or ezpanded fac"I~tie~. Other than an adequate site, there must be a facility to process the materials (sorting, crashing, baling. etc.). • Consistency with toot polidPS plans and ordina_ ce . A drop-off center does not conflict with local policies, plans, or ordinances. • Instimtional barriers to implementation. There are no institutional bartiers preventing development of drop-off centers. • Cost of implementation. Development of a drop-off center requires the acquisi- tion of a site as well as the purchase of equipment, hiring of personnel, and an expenditure of funds to educate the public and encourage participation. Capital costs are generally 51,500 to 515,000 per site. Operating and maintenance costs will depend on the size and the design of the operation. • Av itab~pt. of market_dend-uses. ;Markets ate available for the materials recov- ered at drop-off centers. Specific buyers of the recycled materials are provided in Table 44. • PE!bLc vs. privar~ ooemt;on. Drop-off centers can be operated by either the pubhc or pmate sector, or by some joint arrangement. • Public acceptance. Development of drop-off centers may increase the efficiency of the waste diversiop effort and help attain the AB 939 diversion goals. Howev- er, participation may decrease as curbside and oNer programs that are more convenient develop and expand. 418 SCS ENG~NEENS - • Ooemtine experience. Drop-off programs have developed N Rancho Cucamonga for many years. Volunteer groups usually work with the City and franchised haulers to coordinate efforts which may be only temporary. Cooperation of the haulers or purchases of materials is important to the success of these programs. • Regional appGcabili[v. Processing of materials at a regional facility serving multiple jurisdictions is economically practical. Buv-Back Centers Buy-back center purchase recyclable items directly from the pubhe. Due to the fact that these center provide an economicuECenuve, buy-back operations often focus on aluminum and other commodities of high value. A wide range of recyclable items can be redeemed at this kind of facility. Evaluation of buy-back centers includes the following criteria: • Fffecdveness of Lhe oroeram. Existing buy-back centers N the City of Rancho Cucamonga are diverting 200 tons of the waste generated. This represents approximately O.l percent of the total waste stmam. Studies show that the potential increases when marks prices are high. Table 4-7 shows projected diversion, including the cew buy-back center, based on current waste generation information. • Hazards associated with the program. Buy-back centers create no significant environmental, health, or safety hazards. A buy-back center may create traffic problems, site noise, and liner. • Ability to accommodate chance, A buy-back center can easily adapt to changing economic and techtrological conditions. As the value of recyclable materials changes, the choice of materials purchased can change. 4-19 SCS ENGINEERS - • Cons~auene~s to the waste stre• Buy-back centers will remove recyclable materials such as metals, cardboard, glass, etc., from the waste stream, leavine a greater percentage of nonrRxyclable materials N waste transported to the landfill. Timing. With appropriate permits secured, the design and implementation of a buy-back center can be accomplished in 6 to 12 months, the short-term planning period. Expansion of existing facilities to include a greater variety of materials may be more efficient than development of new facilities. • i~ for new or expa_~ded faciltC In addition to an adequate site, buy-back centers also require the equipment necessary for processing, bating, and preparing the materials for market. • Consistenev with Imo •>~poCd c ~E d .n' p buy-back center does not conflict with local policies, plans, or or[linances. • Institution t 6 ' rs to iylplemen 'on. There are no institutional barriers preventing development of buy-back centers. • ~M,.,_of imolementar+on. Development of a buy-back center requires the acquisi- tion of a site and the developmem of a facility as well as the purchase of equip- ment, hiring of peesonnel, and an expenditure of funds to educate the public and encourage participation. Capita costs are generally 530,000 to 550,000 per site. Operating and maintenance costs will depend on the size and the design of the operation. • Avar_lab~ty of m rk tR/ nd-u °s. Markets ate available for the materials recov- ered at buy-back centers. Speck buyers of the recycled materials zre provided in Tahle 4-4. 4-20 SCS ENGMEFNS - • Public vs pt±vatz opgtation. Buy-back centers can be operated by either the public or the private sector, or some combination of both. • Public acceptance. There are currently successful buy-back centers operating N Rancho Cucamonga. Expansion of existing centers or the addition of new buy- back centers may increase the efficiency of the local waste diversion effort and help the City attain the AB 939 diversion goals. • Ocerati a exceri5nce_. Buy-back centers have served the area for many years. • Reeional applicability. Processing of materials at a regional facility serving multiple jurisdictions is economically practical. Lnstitutional/Office Rtxycline L•r'OZCAm All government agencies, schools, hospitals, offices, and other institutions with large amounts of high-grade paper and other recyclable materials arc the focus of these collection programs. As with other commercial recycling programs. an audit, evaluation, design, development, and implementation plot is structured for each individual situation. Evaluation of institutional office recycling includes the following criteria: • ~(~tiv n •< of the oroeram. Ihte to the tailoring of individual programs to each institution, a wide range of items can be diverted. It is anticipated that the com- bitted efforts of this altentative and the other eommercial/industrial recycling efforts should achieve a diversion potential of 13 percent of the waste stream. Projected results which indicate the effectiveness of recycling programs in offices and institutions are included in Table 4-6. H arrl< aM wi h the oro¢[am. There are tto significant haratds created by most institutiottaVoffice rceycling programs. Should a particular type of material 4-21 - SCS ENG WEFRS - be identified as "special waste," a specific plan would be developed. In general, the materials sought in these programs and the means to divert them pose no hazards. • Ability to accommodate chan~rg. This alternative affords one of the most Flexible opportunities to meet changing conditions. As market conditions change, these programs can easily add or delete items. Similarly, as markets develop for new recyclables, they can easily be added to the co0ection efforts. • Consequences ;a the waste stream. Instiuitional/office recycling programs will pu(1 selected items from the waste stream, usually the material that constitutes a majority of the wastes that are currently Iandfilled. • Tr~jpe. Programs developed as part of this alternative can be implemented easily within the short-term planning period. Usually, these pmgmms can be implemented in 2 to 6 months. • Need for new or e~{panded fac'litlna. No special facilities are required. Adequate transportation and handling facilities presently exist. • onRi ten y wi t, local . iee p anc rid o c. The development of instiNtional/office recycling programs does not conflict with any local policies, plans, or ordinances. • Institutional barriers to implementa~on. There are no institutional barriers preventing implementation of instimtional/office recycling programs. Even in institutions that handle co~dential documents, the paper can be shredded and then recycled. • Cost of implementation. Normally, there are minimal costs associated with the development and implementation of institutionaUoffice recycling programs. Each 4-22 - SCS ENGINEERS - simation is individually developed, Traditionally, the costs associated with these programs are for the purchase and distribution of recycling containers. On occa- sion. businesses may be able to receive some payment for the materials. • 4vallability' of markets/end u Markets are available for the materials collect ed in [his program. Specific buyers aze provided N Table 4-4. • Public vs private operation. Both public and private institutions participate in this alternative. Collection and processing is usually done by the franchised haulers or other private recycling companies. i3tis alternative is an excellent example of the cooperative effort of the City's public and private sectors. • Public accep ~~ P. Institutional office recycling may require some assistance from the City in the original design stages. Once in place, the various programs are virtually self-sustaining, 1'he combined effect of the programs will increase the efficiency of waste diversion and aid in meeting the AB 939 diversion goals. • Onemting exrnrionrn. Office recycling programs have ezisted for many years. General guidelines from existing programs will provide a foundation for achiev- ing success. RegLop3LaQp icab'1ity. Processing of materials at a regional facility serving multiple jurisdictions is economically practical, Mobile Collection Svstem Generally appropriate for coral areas or when other alternatives are not available, mobile collection systems follow two basic formats. A collection vehicle (a track, trailer, or combination) moves into a community or neighborhood according to a predetertriined schedule. Residents drop off presorted materials for deposit, usually for payment (as in a buy-back center). In other instances, unattended containers are left at specified locations (or 4-23 SCS ENGINEERS - limited times, allowing residents to deposit materials. Evaluation of a mobile collection system includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the oroeram. Generally, the diversion potential of a mobile buy- back center is estimated at 1 to 2 percent of generated waste annually. Studies show that the potential increases when the materials are purchased and market prices are high, and when diversion activities take place in lower economic areas. • Hazards asso^iated with the nro~¢t _,. Mobile buy-back centers create no signifi- cant endvunmental, health, or safety hazards. A mobile buy-back center may create mudmal traffic problems, site noise, and litter. • Ab~ty to accomm at h c . A mobile buy-back center can be implemented in 6 months, the short-tern[ planning period, • Need for new or exp-y"~t~t r•~tfri ~, No facilities ate needed for a mobile buy- back center, although a vehicle and/or trailer must be purchased, and the material must go to a processing facility. • n ' n w' L~veloping a mobile buy- back center with the City's franchised haulers does not conflict with local policies, plans, or ordinances, A buy-back center can locate ta areas that ate not zoned to prohibit this activity. "'t' ~o •I 'ers to imotement Con. State re lations gu requve certified redemption facilities ro be open for accepting materials a certain number of days and hours. Most mobile systems move frequently and thus are not regulated in this manner. [n jurisdictions where a high level of independent scavenging exists, [hart: may be some reluctance to develop programs due to the socioeconomic impacts that they may errata. 4-24 SCS FNGWEERS- • Cost of implementar~~n, Development of a mobile buy-back center requires the purchase of a vehicle and/or trailer as well as the purchase of equipmrnt, hiring of personnel, and an expenditure of funds to educate the public and encourage participation. Capital costs ate generally $30,000 to 360,000 for a vehicle and,'or [railer. Operating and maintenance costs will depend on the size and the design of the operation. • Availability of markets/end-uceR. Markets are readily availahle for the materials recovered from mobile collection centers. Specific buyers of the recycled materi- als are provided in Table d-4. • Public v~p~ivate o ra 'on. Mobile buy-back centers can be operated by either the public or private sector, or some combination of both. • Pub is acceotancP. There are currently no mobile buy-back centers operating in Rancho Cucamonga. The addition of mobile operations may increase the results of the waste diversion effort and help attain A13 939 diversion goals. • rat'ng~, rienc+. A number of mobile collection programs have been operated throughout Southern California. Data are available on their effective- ness, and can assist in the development of any new program. • Reeional aEm . 'bili[y. processing of materials at a regional facility serving multiple jurisdictions is economically practical. Recvclinte o(~oa•tn[ctionrllnRnnlitton I)phry On-site separation of construction and demolition debris allows for critical collection of selected materials. Substantial volumes of materials can be diverted, and then: are economic incentives resulting from reduced tipping fees. 4-25 SCS ENGINEERS - Evaluation of the recycling of constmction/demoGtion debris includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the oroeram. Materials targeted for this aitemative are usually grouped into commercial and industrial recycling. However, with [he high degree of cons[mction activity, and with effective programs already in place, this altemath~e is being considered independently. It is anticipated that 2 to 3 percent of the total waste stream in the short term can be diverted by targeting concrete alone. • Hazards associated with the alternative. There are no significant hazards created by this alternative. All environmental, health, and safety concerns will be ad- dressed at the time of permitting. Speck problems will be resolved between the contractor and the authorized hauler at the time that the collection and processing plan is developed. • Ability, to accommodate chance. This alternative can easily 6e mod~ed, expand- ed, or discontinued depending on changing conditions or even the changes that reflect the various stages of conswetion or demolition projects. • ~onseeuence to the w ste stream. This alternative will have a direct impact on removing substantial volumes of materials from the waste stream. This could positively affect the long-term life of the landfill. • '~int:• The foundation for this alternative is already in place in Rancho Cuca- monga, as virtuatly aU conswction projects call upon the franchised haulers to dispose of waste materials. If the materials can be separated, the haulers can take the material to a recycling facility rather than the Lmdfill. • Need for new or exnartded fac~tieR, Facilities for handling the selected materials of this alternative presently exist. There is no indication that new or expanded facilities will be needed to expand these pmgrams. a-26 SC$ ENG1NEfR5 - • Consistency-with loc~olans poLcie_. apd or ' Constructionldemoticion recycling does not conflict wit4 any local plans, poflcies, or ordinances. E~~en[m ally, the City may consider enacting permitting procedures to require this as pan of constuction/demolition permits or development approval processes. • Institutional barriers to implementation. There are no institutional barriers that would prevent implementing a constmctiotJdemolition debris recycling program m Rancho Cucamonga. • Costs of imoiementation. All costs associated wit4 the development of this altemative rela[e to providing storage containers and transposing materials to a processing facility. These costs would vary in each situation. • Av il~abLily of ma_rstetxlend•uses. Matlcets for materiafs recovered through this altemative are mote limited than for traditional recycled items. However, as demonstrated through cu[tent efforts, markets are available and no change in the cnntinued use of these items is anlicipated. • Tltblic vs yrivate ocention. 'This alternative is airued at encouraging all devel- opers (public and privaee) to recycle construction materials. The coordination of the collection program, as well as Itansportatlon, processing, and marketing can be developed baween the franchised haulers and the eoasuuction entity. • EsT~l~if'&. As demonstrated N the successful program already N place, expansion through this altemative will increase the effectiveness of waste diver slow efforts. Troth public acceptance and the technical ability to provide this program have been demonstrted through the current project. • Oneratine experience. The practice of removing construction materials is net new. A structured program, with economic incentives, would be successful. zr 5-27 5<5 ENGINFf FS - • Renal app icability. processing of coL'ected materials at a regional facility serving multiple jurisdictions is economically practical. Manual Material Recovery Facility This alternative begins with the targeted recyclable products being source-separated by the generator from the rest of the garbage, as described in the collection alternatives discussed above. The fo0cwing discussion evaluates the operation of a manuai material recovery facility (MRF) designed to receive commingled recyclables from residential, commercial, or industrial source-separated collection programs. A manual h3RF can range from a single conveyor belt relying heavily on manual sorting that can process 10 to 30 tons per shift, to large technical operations that utilize a combination of sophisticated mechanical and manual sorting which can process 200 to 300 tons per shifr. The processing involves separating the materials by type, removing contaminants, and crushing, flattening, or baling to facilitate trznsportation. Evaluation of the manual hQiF includes the following criteria: • FJfectiveness of the oroeram. In general, manual MRFs do not have a diversion potential of then own, but rather support other collation programs. A manual MRF can separate and recycle between 80 to 95 percent of the delivered material. The residue is a mixture of labels, bottle caps, residual food, dirt, small pieces of broken glass, and nonrayclable items. This processing method preserves the integrity of the recovered materials so that they remain high-quality raw materials for remanufacture. • Haz?rds c ^^iaren wi h rnP ps N all working situations where large equipment is used, health and safety policies at a MRF should be developed and followed by all employees. Other passible hazards associated with a facility are noise, litter, odor, and traffic. The technology is available to solve these prob- lems. J-28 Sc5 EHCIn'i[Ai - • Ability to accommodate chanee. Changes in the waste stream may inquire alter- ation of the ^.peration to accommodate different materials. In a manual ~IRF. these changes should be accomplished easily. • Consequences to the waste stream. A manual ASRF assists in removing recycla- ble materials from the waste stream. + Timine. Implementation of a manual MRF can be accomplished in the shorrterm planting period, usually within 18 to 24 months. • tieed for new or expanded facilities. A MRF will require site and facility devebpment. • onristency wi h loot 'cie . p ass, and otdi~~nces. I~velopment of a manual MRF does not conflict with local policies, plans, or ordinances. A modification of existing contact/franchise agrcements may be required between the jurisdiction and the hauler. • Ins 'tu ion 1 r*i rs 'mol m o a ion. There are no institutional barriers preventing the use of a manual MRF. in jurisdictions where a high level of independent scavenging exists, there may be .wine reluctance to develop programs due to the socioeconomic impacts they may create. • Cost of imolemeotation. &timated capital and construction costs including land. the sWCture, and equipment for such a facility are anticipated to be in the 5300,000 to 51,000,000 range. Operating costs are projected to include sorters, a shift supervisor, management and administration, utilities, maintenance, and other miscellaneous costs. Based upon capital and opeadng factors, the projected pmcessing cost per diverted ton is Sao to 5«l. a-29 i6 ENGINEE95 - ' Availability of markets/end-uses. Markets are readily available for the materials recovered N this collection program. In many cases, the value of the material is higher due to the capability of thorough sorting, producing a cleaner end-product. Specific buyers of the recycled materials are provided N Table 4-1, • Public as private ope~tion. A hfRF can be operated by e8her public or pris ate entities, or by a combination of both. • Publi ac ent~ A manual MRF usually accepts materials from a range of programs--curbside, commercial, industrial, sell-haul, etc. As the focal point for processing and marketing, this atemative would provide a critical link in anv community's recycling program. Siting is of major importance. The potential for noise, traffic, and other concerns has generated interest among nearby residents. A welldesigned program will be important in securing public accep- tance and support. ' ratin¢gpgriSSS~ Processing centers of this type have been in operation in many communities for over 5 years, Municipalities or haulers new to the process can (earn from previous experience, and with adequate planning, be assured of success. • Regional aool'ca-yrl't_v. processing of materials at a regional facility serving multiple jurisdictions is economically pmetical. ~fefhan' d+ t rial R rv Orretatio~ This alternative is based on the existing collection procedure, with all wastes mixed together in one collection vehicle. The following discussion evaluates the operaton of a MRF designed to extmet targeted recyclable materials fmm mined solid waste and, in some cases. produce arefuse-derived fuel or a mixture of organic materials [hat can be composted. For operational and economic reasons. a MRP is usually a large, mechanized system of a-30 SCS ENG'~NEE95 - trommels, am class~ers, shredders, magnets, and manual lotting that can process from several hundred to over 1,000 tons per shift. Eaaluation of a mechanized MRF includes the following criteria: Effectiseness of the orogram. The tare of material recovery at a mechanized MRF can range from 15 to 50 percent of the waste stream, depending on the composition of the incoming waste and the operation of the facility. Because the recyclables are collected together with waste products, the integrity of recovered materials may be compromised. • wands assor_i?r._d with the nmo.an,. As ~ all working situations where large equipment is used, health and safety policies at a 11-fRF should be developed and followed by ali employees. Other possible hazards associated with a facility ate noise, liner, odor, and traffic. Awell-designed program can solve these pmtr lems. • Abu(y to accomm at ~ Changes in the waste stream may require alter- ation of the vperaion to accommodate different materials. In a mechanized 1v1RF, these changes may require altetaion of [he existing equipment or the purchase of additional equipment. • on ~elA^•c t M w cre cr.n99n, A mechanized jig will remove recyclable materials from the waste stream, increasing the percentage of nonracyclable materials to be landfdled. • JLtlI1Y. Implementation of a mechanized hIItF can be accomplished m the short- term peiod. • Need for new or ex ~ded fac'li + 9. A mechanized MRF will ttquire site and facility development, usually taling between 24~to 36 months m implement. One .~ x 4-31 SCS ENGIry EEAS - of the City's authorized haulers is proposing to build a nIItF in Fontana, and, with the anticipated cfosurz of the local landfill. a joint MRF!transfer smtion is beine consideretl for the site. Consistency with local 'vieplans and ordinances. Development of a mecha- nized bfRF does no[ conflict with local policies, plans, or ordinances. A modifi- ca[ion of existing contractiftanchise agreements may be required between the jurisdiction and the hauler. Should more than one city join together for the development of this altemative, additional regional and multijurisdictional policies. plans, and ordinances must be examined. • I t~imtion~ ba_*tiets to~tnplementadon. There ate no institutional bamers preventing the use of a mechanized MRF. !n jurisdictions where high levels of independent scavenging exist, there may be some reluctance to develop programs due to the socioeconomic impacts they may create. • Cos[ of 'r~rtptementation. Depending on the site chosen for development and the design. costs for a mechanized MRF could range up to 510,000,000. Should a facility be developed and utilized by several jurisdictions, economics of operation and transportation would be realized by aU participants. • Avai ab'fi of ma~rre_ts[end-uces. 6farkets are available foc the materials chat could be recovered by a MHF, although there may 6e problems with contamina- tion of paper by food waste. • Public vs private ocetation. Most jurisdictions contract with private operators for the design, development, and implementation of mechanized MRFs. • Public acceotattS&. Mechanized MRFs ate being used successfully throughout the country to divert recyclable materials from the waste strram. As the focal point for processing and marketing, this alternative would provide a critical Unk in any 4-32 acs srr,i~veres - community's recycling program. Siting is critical. The potential for noire. tm[t,c, and other concerns has generated interest among local residents. A well- designed program will be critical in securing public acceptance and support. • Orzratine experience. Processing centers of this type have been in operation for many years, but most of them have focused on the production of infuse-derived fuel. Their ability to recover high rates of marketable materials is untested. particulazly for paper products. • Re¢ional aoolicabiliev. Processing of materials at a regional facility serving multiple jurisdictions is economically practical. Landfill SalvaginY This type of salvaging operation manually recovers bulky goods or other items from the mixed waste stream after they arrive at the lartdfill site or transfer station. Tazgeted commodities include scrap metals, building materials, and wood, which are usually not recycled efficiently in other progcams. This process is inexpensive but requires adequate space and traffic Flow control. It is limited in its diversion volumes. At present, the contract operator for San Bernardino County provides these services a[ the local landfill (Milliken). Evaluation of landfill salvaging includes the following criteria: Effectiveness of the orotaam. Generally, the diversion potential of landfil salvaging is 2 to 5 percent of the waste brought to the lartdfill annually. Landfill salvaging is especially effective in removing items such as scrap materials, building materials, thes, and other materials disposed of of large quantities from the waste stream that ate not removed in other types of rrxycling programs. 4-37 SCS ENGINEERS - Hazards associated with the prsemm. Health and safety hazards associated with landfill salvaging are similar to those inherent ro all landfills, such as the daneers of working in close proximity to large equipment and machinery. The hazards are known and controlled by implementing health and safety codes, which shouirl already be irz place at the landfills. Landfill salvaging may impact traffic flow. requiring changes m the traffe design. • 4pility to accommodate cha Landfill salvaging can be very adaptable to changing economic and technological conditions. For example, if certain types of materials become more or less valuable from a recycling standpoint, the program can either add or subtract certain materials from the collection process. • Con~RUences to the as re ctre Landfill salvaging will remove recyclable materials from the landfill, leaving a greater percentage of nonrecyclable materi- als to be buried. • Timine. Landfill salvaging can be unplemented at a landfill or transfer station in the short-term planning period, probably within a few months. • .Need for fac~li i c, Landfill salvaging uses existing facilities at the landfill and.~nr transfer station and requires no new facilities. • Consistency with 1 nl oo i i c p]anR ed old' a _p . Landfill salvaging does not conflin with local pohciu, plans, or ordinances, as long as it is conducted by the landfill or transfer stations only. • Incptutional criers to implement Con. There are no instiNtional barriers to preventing implementation of landfill salvaging. Should a new Iandfip be si[ed at extensive distances from a jurisdiction, salvaging at a transfer site may be more feasible. Permitting and public acceptance would be required. 4-34 SCS ENGINEERS - Cost ofunDie^+°^raN^^. Landfill salvaging uses equipment already available at the landfill or transfer station. Additional equipment, such as storage containers and vehicles, may need to be purchased. The program may also require addition- al staffimanagement. Depending on the individual needs of the program, the estimated cost of landfill salvaging is $5,000 to 550,000, ° availability ofof m~kgzi,~+ Markets are available for the materials recov- ered in this collection program, Speck buyers of the recycled materials are provided m Table 4-4. • Public vs oriva ration. The existing landfill salvaging program is operated by the authorized San Bernardino County Iandfdl operator, but a joint effort with the jurisdictions is possible. • Pub is ac eo •^ P. Continued landfill salvaging for Rancho Cucamonga will increase the effectiveness of the waste diversion effort and help attain AB 939 diversion goals. Since no new facilities are required, there is little public interest. • rat'r,e exnerieocP. The current program at the local landfill (Milliken) has provided extensive data on this type of program. • Reeional av itab'lity. This alternative is appropriate to serve all jurisdictions using a given landfill, although it may be difficult to disaggregate the amount of diversion credited to each jurisdiction. Additional Recv f Activities [n addition to the previous alternatives, the City needs w evaluate the following activities which may facilitate waste diversion through recycling: 5-35 Changing Zoning and Building Code PraMices to Encourage Recycling-- ICS FNGINEEAS - There are no zoning codes in Rancho Cucamonga that prevent implementation of proposed recycling programs. It would be beneficial to long-term recycling efforts for the city to establish building codes requiring adequate space allotment for storage of recyclables. This could be especia!]y effective at multifamily residences, businesses, and manufacturing facilities. Changing the Existing Solid Waste Rate Structures to Encourzge RecycRng- The City should consider increasing commutity participation in recycling programs through changes N rate stmcmres. Examples include charging higher rates for each additional garbage container used by residents and charging higher commercial rates for everything except sorted recyclable materials. This matter is addressed in mote detail in the Source Reduction Component. Increasing Markets for Recycled :Naterials- The City has in place a procurement policy for the purchase of recycled products which increases end-uses of recyclable materials. Examples of this activity include using recycled office paper, using retreaded tires on public vehicles, and using compost from waste to meet soil amendment needs at community parks and roadside projects. SELECTION OF RECYCLING PROGRAMS This section describes the alternatives selected by ¢he City of Rancho Cucamonga to be implemented doting the short- and medium-term planning periods. The decisions leading to the spectfic selections were based on data from the Waste Generation Study, as well as on evaluation of the criteria for each recycling alternative. The programs selected are listed below, in no specific order: 436 • Residential. • Multifamily ([o be part of commerciaL'industrial). • Commerciallindustrial. • Drop-off centers. • Buy-back centers. • InstimtionaVoffice ccycling. • Manual MRF. • Mechanized MRF. • Landfill salvaging. Residential Curbside Collection 5<E ENGINEERS - The City of Rancho Cucamonga contracts for all residential and commercial waste hauling. In cooperation with the franchised haulers, three pilot residential curbside collection programs are under way. It is intended to utilize the data from the pilot study to expand the program citywide by the end of 1992. Collection will be every week on the same day as regular trash service. Mu of roily Recyclina Structured recycling programs at the multifamily complexes in Rancho Cucamonga will be developed as part of the CommerciaUlndustrial Recycling Program. The City's franchised haulers presently collect refuse at all multifamily units. The same audit system used for commercial and industrial accounts will be employed to determine the type of recycling program for each complex. A phase-in approach will also be followed. 4-37 Commercial/Industrial Recvdine iCi ENGIMEFaS - Due to the high diversion potential, this altemative was selected for implementation, The program will be developed in conjunction with the City's franchised haulers, who have similar proerams in operation throughout Southern California. Audits of all businesses will be conducted and a straregic plan developed, targeting those fums having large amounts of accessible materials. A phase-N plan will continue until all appropriate commercial and industrial accounts have recycling pmgtams in place. Droo-off Centers Drop-off operations have been selected as an altemative because they currently exist at several uhools, churches, and other volunteer centers. In addition to their diversion and income value, they ate a direct part of the ongoing educational programs wi[hin the schools and among the public. The City will consider developing municipally sponsored centers. Buwback Centers A public buy-back center is being operated in conjunction with the material processing facility managed by one of the City's authorized haulers. In addition, there are State of California cenifred buy-back centers N the area, Outlets also exist which take additional items such as newspaper, used motor oil, scrap metal, and other miscellaneous recyclable items. The financial incentive related to recycling is important to many residents and the redemption concept is seen as an important factor in achieving desired diversion goals. InstitutionaUOffc~R vc In¢ Following the lead of the City Hall office recycling program, Rancho Cucamonga will develop similar activities throughout the City. Governmental agencies, schools, hospitals. and other institutions will be the prime targets for the office recycling program. Programs aimed at all commercial and business offices will follow, In addition to the usual target of s-38 SCS ENGINEERS - high-grade and other paper, the office instimtionz.l programs will also attempt to recycle other materials where appropriate. These items could include items such as glass and beverage containers in lunch rooms; newspaper and other materials unique to a particular business could also be recycled. Even though diversion potemial is low, there is educational value in source separation programs in the work place. Recvclin¢ of ConRructioo/Demolitioo Debris Due to the high volume of construction and development in the area, this altema[ive was selected forunplementation. Specific programs will he developed to encourage on-site separation of selected materials such as wood waste, concrete, and asphalt. It is anticipated that programs of this type will dictate special permitting procedures, and that price incentives for developers will enhance participation. Vfanual WateristLs Rernverv Facility One of the City's franchised haulers presently operates an g5-ton-per-day facility located nearby in Chino. The facility serves several jurisdictions under conuactual arrangements with the hauler. Present contracts ensure that the City will have processing and marketing operations at least through the short-term planning period. Because the facility is privately owned and operated, users ate charged a flat cost-per-ton for handling, processing, and mar- keting materials. rfechaoi>ad Mstetiel REEnEVet'a' FLCLtV -Che City anticipates working cooperatively with other nearby jurisdictions to design and implement a comprehensive materials recovery and processing facility. It is anticipatai that this facility would not be operational until the medium-term planning period. 5-39 Iand ill S Iva aeinQ 56 ENGiNfF45 - .at present, a limited amount of salvagine occurs at the Milliken Landfill•-the City's disposal site. Rancho Cucamonga encourages the continuation of this effort as long as the facility remains open. This t}pe of program is panicularly zffective in diverting bulky goods. scrap rnetais. building materials, and other items difficult to recycle. Plans have not been des eloped for alternatives upon the closure of ~fil7iken Landfill. The City wil! encourage a program to divert these wastes at any new facility. PROGRA.~15 SOT SELECTED With the dece!opment of residential, curbside, and other recycling programs, as well as the cost and limited effectiveness of [he moblle collection system, the alternative did no[ seem appropriate for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CL:~7[;LATIVE LYTECRATED EFFECT OF THE PROGRA:~fS Table 4-S shows the cumulative effectiveness of all selected programs in terms of both tonnage and perent of diversion, when such programs have been implemented in the short- term planning period. Table 4-9 shows recycling progrart[ diversion estimates for the short and medium-term planning periods, respectively. End•Cses for Recycled Alaterials The produtts derived From recycled materials are very diverse. Some of these ptcxlucts am listed below: d-JO SCS ENGINEERS - Jf teriai ~4 Paper products New paper products, animal txdding Plastic film New bags, o[h. ~ products, plastic lumber HDPE New bottles, other plastic products. plastic lumber PET Fiberfill, new PET bottles, other plastic products Polysryrene New plastic products, plastic lumber Tin, food, and beveage cans New cans, other steel-related products Other ferrous metals New metal products Aluminum cans New cans Other aluminum New aluminum products Redeemable glass New bottles Other recyclable glass New bottles Other Blass Road base "glasphalt" Woodshavings Animal bedding, compost End-Markets for Recv t ht ~fateria Diverted to Selected Proerptns Table 4.4 shows the brokers and markets for recyclable materials which are available to Rancho Cucamonga. Though this Gst is not comprehensive and is subject to constant change, it docs demonstrate that markets exist for materials targeted through recycling programs. Contineencv Vteavures If f~ avorable yLrket ~gdEt' n Markets for recycled products are prone to cyclical changes m demand and price. In addition, material quality is a very important factor. Materials processed through a bfRF may be prone to increased scrutiny by brokers and end-users. Often, these materials may carry a lower price or may be rejected altogether. The overall marketing strategy for the 4-4I iCi E4GINEENS - operator of the ~fRF will be to .,eG most colleted materials through brokers. Should evisting markets fail, the City and the 11RF operator will work in conjunction with others in the region and the state to locate or develop new markets or internal uses for materials. The focus of these efforts will depend on the cause of the market failure and the extent of the oversupply. The City will continue to coordinate market development activities with the County. PROGRA.tiI LMPLE~fE\"TATiOr The Citv and its franchised haulers will take primary responsibility for implementing the programs listed. The primary contact representing the franchised haulers will be the Cin~ Slanager's Office. The City's Fngineering Department will take the lead in the implementa- tion of recycling programs. Ultimately, the City will have the final word on programs. Tables 4-10 through 4-16 detail the tasks, dates of completion, and funding for each of the selected alternatives. ~IO:~TTOREVG AND EVALUATION The City will be responsible for the monitoring and evaluation of all authorized recycling programs. Waste diversion will be reported by volume or by weight in percent of total waste generated. The following section outlines the methods to be used to measure the effective- ness of each of the selected alternatives. rit ri for valuation of Proatam Effectiveness and Contin¢encv Measures 1. Were objectives for overall diversion attained? • identify reasons that goals are not being met. • If not attained, review goals and objectives. Were they realistic? Should they be modified? 4-42 F<5 ENGINEERS - • Ate there any methods which could be used to increase efficiency of the collection system? • Investigate employce training and performance. • Investigate new incentives or programs to recycle. • Review any new technologies or procedures which may increase effectiveness. • Increase frequency of monitoring and review. 2. Were anticipated levels of materials recovered similar to their proportion in the waste stream? • Identify reason for target not being achieved, • Is lack of recovery due to unproper training? • Are levels of materials coming into the MRF lower than anticipated? 3. Were targeted materials effectively marketed? • Identify reasons for iceffective marketing. • Evaluate external markets and whether demand levels are changing. • Seek alternative markets. 1. Are targeted materials delivered according to market quality standards? • If materials are dirty, review handling methods. • Requcst explanation from broker/end-user as to why materals do not conform and what can be done. 4-43 5 5^,S iNG'~NfFFS - Were all activities performed in an approved marmeC Were all applicable fzderal. statz. and local laws and ordinances observed? • Identify different operating procedures which will restore compliance. • h tarezted material or procedure contributing sienificantly to diversion goals or the os erall intent of AB 939'' • Seek conditional exception to regulation if needed for program integrity. 5. Are there any hazards posed by the working environment or the products coming out of the \fRF"? • identify reasons for problems. • If material or procedures are no[ vital to meeting goals and objectives, discontinue. • It vital, seek alternate methods to attain compliance. 7. Are all parties performing according to terms of agreements? • Evaluate adequacy of staffing levels. • Review contract of operator (if contracted out). Rgoortig¢ 1?rocedures Residential Curbside Recyc6ng- The authorized hauler will be responsible for providing the City with monthly reports on the results of this program. The report will provide the number of daily pickups and the total of homes serviced during a given month. A concurrent Ust of all recydables diverted during the month will be included, broken out by material and weight. The total of residential waste generated versus amounts diverted will be compiled by the City's franchised haulers. a-sa Multifamily Recycling- iC5 ENGINEERS - The monitoring system will be developed for these programs using the same methods as those described below. Commercial/Industrial Recycling-- As indicated, each business will be audited to determine the types and volumes of materials diverted and methods for diverting them- In accordance with the development of each plan. a monitoring system will be designed to insure that each business receives credit for its effort, as weB as providing the City with accurate information on materials diverted. Drop-Off Centers- This entity is responsible for the marketing and sales of materials, and will make data available to the City. Buv-Back Centers-- AB buy-back centers are privately operated. As a requirement of granting a business license, the centers are required to report the type and volume of materials collected and sold (diverted) on a monthly basis. InstitutiooaUOfflce RecycBnf- The monitoring system will be developed for these programs using the same methods as those for commemial/industrial recycling. 4-SS Recycling of ConstructioNDemolition Debris-- SCS £NG~hrERS - Monitoring of these programs will be the responsibility of the franchised haulers. Periodic reports mill be required, indicating the type and columeiweight of each material diverted. Should a shortfall occur, permitting procedu2s may be tightened. Manual and/or Mechanized JfateriaLs Recovery Facility'-- As [he facility that will handle most of the recycling and daversion activities within the Citv, the franchised hauler will keep critically accurate records of all programs. Daily records, as wel! as aU other requited tepons, will be available ro the Fitgineering Department. Landfill Salvaging- All records will be provided by the San Bernardino County facility operators. Shortfall Imnlementatioo Alternatives Should the monitoring of the recycling objectives show a shortfall, the following measures would be taken: • Promotio°. Through City administration and the swcture of the education component, new and expanded advertising, promotion, and publicity campaigns may be developed andunplemented. • ~~~. In all cases where user fees are involved, program shortfalls may necessitate evaluations and increases in order to stimulate the financial incentive to participate. • 'Materials Recoverv Facility. Critical monitoring of this operator will be nec- essary to insure diversion goals are being met. Should a shortfall develoo, 4-16 SCS ENGINEERS - expanded and intensified practices for the separation and recovery of recyclabie materials will be implemented. The City may also increase anti-scavenger enforcement ff unauthorized collection is diverting materials away from the !viRF. In addition to those programs which can be monitored through documented information, the City may undertake a waste generation study to determine the effectiveness of all diversion efforts. Fundint! Estimated annual costs for repotting ate 550.000 to 570.000. A major portion of this expense would cover costs associated with an updated Wazte Generation Stvdy. 1-47 ENGINEf RS - TABLE 41 SfSORT• AN[f MFDSiPub•T'E7tb7 RECYCLSNG C.oAI.S I ~ I990 1995 2000 I Tons per wear I ].100 37.600 85.500 Pcmem of wa3tc ecnrsted 8 S .0.6 }~ 6 4-J8 SCE ENGINEERS - TABLE LZ CIfY OF BA.*ICHO CT3CA.MONGA EXTSCIIs'G WASTE DIVERSION LLSIID BY SOURCE AND 7YPE Source Category Type Annual Tarts Diverted .I r- ' Rsidenr, al AB :020 G1us )tired 710 Rcsidcrtial :~B '_020 b1eW ;4luminum caos 240 Residential AB 70:0 Plastic \ot spa<ifi~ IO Residential Paper OCC 50 ' Residential Paper OVP IW SubtoW 610 Commercial Ocher Asphalt 750 Cemm<rial Other Cancsete 900 Commercial Grows Wule Tree trimmings I.IW ', Commercial Paper OCC 1,350 SnbfoW 4.100 Industrial Glare Cullen 210 Industrial MeW rU cities 60 fndustnal MeW Al xnp ~ 730 (ndustrial MeW Cold-rolled stal 53 Industrial MeW BWnlesa scrap 284 Industrial MeW Steel scrap 3,SOQ Irdustnnl Organic Wood shavings 96 Industrial Older Concmte 600 Industrial Paper OCC 525 Industrial Platic PET (2 SubtoW 5.670 All sources' Paper OCC 3 :VI srvrces Paper OVP 197 Subtoul =~ I landfill Salvage MeW Mixed 876 landfill Selvage Organic wood 744 I SubtoW 1.620 I, TO-FAL 12.400 r<egmnu ouy ~aacx cancan. 4-a9 SCS FhGWEFRa - TABLE Q.i - ~ - SHORT-TERM PROSECTED lliVERSION 6OR RES®INTF6L RECYCLINGr' ~ }tateEial dmount Collected# Sewsprin~ 3.606 - PET and HDPE 1.057 Glafs L466 Tin 716 Aluminum Cms 273 \1ixM Paper 1.226 Higb Grade 249 Cortugated 959 TOTgL 9,552 Divenioe 5.3A • Tons per year. Section 10 details the acaumptions used to ~Icula[e to0wgn. 4-50 ENGINEERS _ TdBt.E 44 hfAHKtiTS F68 RECYCLABLE MdTPRfAI3 MatErials Prrottssors/Manufacturers Kraft paper'cortugatrd cardboard Inland Coatamers Corp.. Ontario I ~tisd paper Fonbne Paper. Footane Seu sprint Smurfit Pomoua High-grade paper Fontam Paper. Fontana i Plastic film Envirothene, Chino HDPE plastic Envirothene, Chino PET plastic Plastics Rmycl< Corporation of California (PRCC), Loa Angeles Polystyrene Yatioml Polystyrene Recycle Corporuioo (NPSRC), Corona I Tm food and 6evenge ram Proler Intervatioml, Loa Angeles Ocher ferrous metals Proler Iatenutioml, Im Angela Aluminum cans Liston Aluminum Brick, Comm tiooferrous meWa Pmler Interostioosl, Ira Angela Rrdamable glass OweouBrockwry, Pomom Other recyclable glasv Owen/Brockway, Pomom Other Slaw Local asphalt manufuturcr/aggregate producer Wood shn'inga Crown Shavings, Chino 4-51 SCS FNGiNEFRS - . TAHLE 4-5 ~ 51tORT-TERM PROIELTED MVERSEON FOIL M4'E.T~'AMILY RECYCLING• Material Amouut Collected# Sew sprint 470 PET and HDPE 100 ~ Glass 160 Tiu 80 Aluminum '_0 i Stied Paper 0 High Grade 0 Corrugated 0 TOTAL gi0 o~aa o.s>f Tons per year. Sation 10 details We wumptiom used to rilculeEe tomaga. 4-52 iCi ENGINEERS - TA&.E 46 SRORT-7ER.M PROJECTED DPYERSION POR COR~4IERCIAJ.JOVDUSTRUL RECYCCEVG~ 1laterial .aannunt Collected# \euspnnt gy4 Hi¢lrGrade Papcr 2.030 Corrugated Cardtioud 5,9"12 Aluminum Cans 320 Tin Cans 410 Ferrous ~feuls 3.172 Yonfe¢ou \ietas 2I3 Glass Ccominers 726 Concrete 2.702 Wood 7.380 PET and HDPE 503 TaD~. i+.m Dis+eaaia6 fa.oA rum per year. $ec~ioo IO derails Ne assumptiam uud to calculate tatuugev. 4-53 SCS ENGINEERS - TABLE 4T SNORT-TBRAi PROjfiCTED IIIYERS[ON €OR BUYBACK CRN'IER3" Materiel ,Unowt Collected! ~` ~eU SPA I I(b PET and HDPE gp Glass 50 .aluminum 38 Corrugated qp High Grade ,~,p Tin )p TOTAL 39p IXveniae OS% Tons per year. `y Section 10 devils the assemptioas used to calculate tomagea. a-sa i~ _ +~ - C r ~, ~ T A ~ _ ~ N ~ ~ S' L ? .L b I m 7 L' ~ _ N _ N h .p - p ~' j t`i I F .' I I <= I II S e o f o 0 0 a of c e o _ rv ce l n II ` c I -i r ^ ~ X T '+ N r 9 '7 ~ t ' ~ 9 Y ~ Y i r O i[ _ ~ - ~ O O I O ~ '.J O M y ii J a ~ ~ ~ ~ Z L ~ t ^ ~ ~ b ~ r d N ~ N P O oy ' pry M1 O ~ s ~ Y. t'1 ~/1 C N ! 1 f~ N N fn ~ e N F 6 ~ ! ~ F C J ~ ~ i FI ' `j. Y h .yp `O 1 O yP~ Y.. N O~ N O C N ~ I O ~t ?~ N N E+ ~ _ _ ,~ CI a Z e ° ~ ~ S = ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ 3 ~ y ~ d N Q ~ , ~ ~ (~ ~C~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J[ a_ ~G U (~ 3 a -~` = 6 y ~ ~ ~ A r e F p ~ ~ $ Z d U F S ~ Z (J f 2 3 Ci e 'c s-55 sCS ENGINEERS - TABLE 44 RECYCLING PROGRAM DIYER9fOtV FSf1MATE3 (PERCEM' OF TOTAL WASfE GIIYERAT®T Ptrogram Short Term ~fedimn Term ResideNial Curbsidc 5.2 10.5 ~ ComroereiRl ladustrial' ~ U.0 23.7 Sfultifami!y 0.5 L9 I Buv-Beck 0.2 0.3 Conswcriov Demolition 2.3 3.0 Subtotal 2L2 3g.9 Processing Loss 0.6 l.3 TOTAL 20-6 JT.6 4-56 II ~ ~ ~ ~ - I '° N % v ~ i }~ X ~ K i w a - ~ ~ x 'c H r N (~ L T U T v \ _T u 7 _T v C t y U V V _ (~ ~ y a ~jn C 3 ~ ~ L L 3 ~ 6 a 5 5 3 3 3 ` L G G y 5 5 _ 5 ICJ ~ ~ ~ u X 5 r~ Vs c X .. ~ ~ a ~ e a E ~ ,~ p ~ ~' r ~ ° ;~ 9 y F ~ 5 _ L ' ~ e °~ ~ ~ 9 9 5 - ~ d o ~ _n ~ a ' ~L ~ ~ c 3 ~ ~ o ~ 9 ~ ~ a ~ a 0 a a q 4-57 i i ~ ~ ~ .~ i I ~ I ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y II si ~ z Y R Y 4 w ~ ~ ~' ~~ z 3 ill L w~ r 9 _i ~. T T T a. 'w' _ _ _ _ c u ~ `~ u s ~ ?' a ' ' e s c a V u s V y 3 i 3 ~, 3. ~ ; 3 ~ s 4 a 5 5 a 5 W r a ~+ u E ~ # ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ 2` 9 $ _ c U ~ ~ pp4~~~ o°_ 0 F 3 C c '? ~°' g S 5 ~ 5 2 a ~ a '_ a ~ 0 9 ~ - o a ~ ? c F ~ '~ ~ ~ a s ±w C f: ~ S ~ 0 c a as 3 4SS L ~ y 8 } L '~ ~ ~ ~ 'A O B O ] [ t V • t H M1 N N dr _T t I f : ~ '0 C i 7 i T v J ~ - F i z 'J it ~ _ ^ u .*~ Y ~ m a - ~ 3 3 3 3 'm ~ 6 0 2 3 '~ ~ ~ 3 , ~ ~• - - r S S ~ x ._ c a a 5 i i i 9 C tl .~. m ~ m fi ~ w C ~ ~ E m R ,c F ~ m E R 9 a Z a ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ s a s - fi E ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ < Z n~ V 3 ~ ~ ~ a ~ 9 ~ ~ $g ~ ~ a 9 aO ~ ~ 's ..i a ~ o ~ ' ~ < % 0 9 ~~ ~ jf j C ~ 6 C O ~ y C V f n ~ ~ ~ ~ s a 5 fi 3 ~ o ~ 8 5 a 0 a-59 ~_ s ~ a ~ ~ 0 x G a ~ ~ ][ r ~ Y ~ L_ J Z ~ J Y V .g - ILI 'Y T _T ~T „T _T ~ _ C v u _ v o u 0 O c L G L L "f' t 'p^ G6 U 'Z U '~ 1~ ; 4 '3 Y ~ L ~_ ~ } p L ~cwi d ~ 9 5 5 i 5 u. ~~ e f^ ~ ~ ~ C ~ 0~0 m ~ aN o ~ ' F a' a P J Jt e ~ - ~' -~ - E a ~ E ~ E )1 F $ F e o ~ ,> 7 ~ .~ 0 9 I o. -3 ~ m ~ 0 00 S yS F C aY _ F }0 E c 2 0 V a 4-60 i,, [~.K c c n Z u E D ? '~ ~ c ~ .. ~ r it = ~ 6 ~ Y ~ O ~ y c T m' y 3 T m' y $ ~ b IT` a ~ ~~ x 4 ~ C m d ~ e~0 ~ ~E Y ~i ~ a ;~ o e a ~~ . ~ 9 ~ 6 .5 ~ .g 0 7 2 3 ~ ~ k p 0 T yy Q ~ m s 0 u S 0 5 f 4-61 ~% ~ Y Y ~ I • L Q X N Y t6 ~ _ , p i ~ ; ! H V z F _ _T _T T _a _T D r e c ~, ,1 ~ s' a' r 5 E' n - ~ u 3 3 _ 3 33 ~ O ~ ~ ~' M . U v30 s 6 ~ ~ - `~ ' 's `~ IV J. J. i m E j rv ~ c = m ~0 e m ~ ~ - °o ~ m F. ~ ~ a - ~ ~ ~ ~ L x 4 c' ~ y ~ h ~ F F o a ~ 9 & ~ a ~ ~ S 6 _ u ~ a ~ ~ 9 m ~~ nJ G e ~ a l^ , . t F 5 m ~ ~ o E 0p E 0 a 0 0 r 4-62 ~ ~ ~I ~ x ~ ~ W O Y Y » $ M .L V N ~ I N n A n Y ; - - C u _ 0 V 1 ~ A S L y 1 L y _ a ~^ C Y Y ^ Y = L , p 4 ; 3 3 ~ > 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ `O p~ ~ 5 G q C L~ 5 C [F~ ~ 3 m c ~ e S [~ LLL iII = C O C F , C ~ R J NS ~ O M "0 ~ ~ N ~ 00 '~ '9 M a ~ (p P ~ ~ pry. P F £ ~ ']_. ~ ~ a a B e A E $ ' G 5 d y , m °° m 5 ° a '9 F c ~, y ~ N z b a E ~ ~ c ~ ' a x ~ ` c T z y U y 2 ] m ~ L c" 1 E ~ ~ ~ a 2 - V ~ O ~ T a ~ v O ~ g s-63 Sf5 ENGINEERS - IlNPLEhiIIVTATtON SCHEDULE FOR REGIONAL ~ 1fATERIALS RECOVERY FACII.ITY I ~~ Task Date Responsible Entity Estimated I ~~ I Negotiate with other January 1992 Engineering Dept. F~cisting cities in the atra to Salaries establish a regional transfer station and materials recovery facility Site and permit facility November 1992 Regional Group User fees` Start transfer operations January 1994 Regional Group User fees` Start material recovery Iuly 1995 Regional Group User fees` operations " Total costs for a regional facility ate estimated at between 35 and S10 million d~yending on site requirements and siu. Costs to Rancho Cucamonga will depend on the amount of material sent to the facility from the City and how many other cities participate. Note: This schedule is based on Milliken Iani:dl closing at the end of 1993. If that changes, the implementation schedule for the regional MRF will change also. 464 iC5 E4G'~NEFNS - SECTIO\ 5 COMPOSTL~G CO\fP0\'E1'T Composting is a solid waste management pactice that involves accelerated biological decomposition of organic materials under controlled conditions. Materials most often composted include grass clippings, leaves, plant and tree pmnings, animal manures, food wastes, and sewage sludge. In the aerobic composting process, bacteria and fungi consume available nutrients (particuhvly carbon and nitrogen) in the presence of oxygen and water. and generate a considerable amount of heat. The end result is a stable product that enhances soil nuMent content and water-retaining capacity, and can be applied to a variety of horticul- tural, agricultural, or landscaping uses. OB,fECT'IVE.S The following diversion goals are to be attained in the short- and medium-term planning periods through the collection and processing of green wastes into compost: • Through a regional group, site and permit a composting facility. • In the medium-term planning period (1995-2000), divert through composting ',S to g0 percent of the green waste generated. • In the short- and medium-term planning periods, develop and implement a public education program that encourages participation in source-separating green waste for composting and stresses the importance of keeping green waste free of contaminants. 5-I SCS ENGWFFRS - • In the short- and medium-tetra planning periods, to expand the markets for ereen waste compost through using the material in municipal projects and encouraghtg its use in agriculture as a soil amendment. Because woody material such as tree trimmings decomposes very slow9y, undigested mood chips remaining after the screening of f-utished compost need to be reincorporated into another compost pile or sold as mulch. Although the sate of wood chips as mulch is a form of recycling (not composting), the amount of green a~as[es to be diverted through mulchine is included in the composting objectives shown above. Priori Materials for Waste Diversion AB 939 guidelines require that the Composting Component identify waste types as priorities for meeting the above objectives. At a minunum, the following criteria must be used to select these waste types: • Volume of the solid waste. • Weight of the solid waste. • Hazard of the solid waste material when disposed. The following criterion was added to the above list of required criteria for selecting waste types: • The ease with which the waste material can be collected separately and made available as input to the composting process, as measured by the costs and level of public effort required. eased on the above criteria, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will target green waste Igrass clippings, leaves, plant, and tree prunings) for diversion through composting, in order to achieve the stated objectives of this component. Green waste represents one of the largest 5-2 SCS FHGINiFRS - single items in the waste stream by both weight and volume, and is relatively easy to collect.. Other organic materials, such as food waste and contaminated paper, are also generated in large amounts, but are more difficult and costly to collect and process; these items, there- fore, have not been identified as priority materials for diversion through composting at this time. Composting programs could be developed for these materials if [he City is unable to meet diversion goals with other more cost-effective methods. Diversion estimates are outlined in Table 5-I. EXLSTL\G CO~T)I'fIONS The City of Rancho Cucamonga has no separate collection or composting of green waste. All of this material is collected mixed with other waste and landfilled. The only excep[ion is approximately 1,100 tons per year (0.8 percent of the total waste generated by the City) of green waste generated as part of City park and street maintenance. This material is diverted by the contractors for use as compost and mulch. Planned Reduction of Existing Prom'ams No existing composting programs will be phased out, reduced, or closed. DESCRIP'CION OF ALTERNATIVES The following alternatives ate described for the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Collection Akernntives 1. Residential curbside collection. ?. Drop~off facilities. 3. Separation of green waste at a central processing facility. S-3 Prot in Alt rnative • Green wane windrow composting. Shine Alternati.,e • City or regional site. Collection A)ternatire 1 -Residential Curbside CoOection- 5($ iNOINFEPS - Curbside collection of green waste involves the source separation of green wane by residents into containers or onto the street. Containers may be bags made of paper or plastic, or rigid plastic bins, The green waste is then collected by a frontend loader and track or by a standard municipal waste collection vehicle. Participation can be voluntary or mandatory as determined by local officials. If the gmen waste is placed in the street without a container, it must be picked up by a front-end loader with a "claw" attachment and a truck. A street sweeper usually follows the collection to remove any material that was not picked up by the collection c2w. This collection system is used successfully by the cities of Davis and Sacramento for all types of green waste (grass clippings, leaves, bntsh, and prunings), but is generally more expensive than containerized collection with a standard refuse wek. Some problems that have been observed with loose collection are blowing green waste, cars driving over the green waste, automobile catalytic converters starting fires, vehicles parked on top of the green waste, sewer drain blockages, and contamination by rocks, glass, sticks, and oil. Containerized collection of green waste involves the separate collection from containers at residential units. This type of collection system is widely used and cheaper than loose collection. Al] types of green wane can be collected in containers ('grass clippings, leaves. 5-4 SCE ENGINEERS - bmsh, and ptvnings), but large pieces of brash and pmnings will either need to be trimmed to fit in the container or bundled together separately and placed next to the container. Problems that have been reported with containerized green waste collection include trash placed in collection containers, plastic bags falling apart, crew members injuring themseh'es liking heap}' bags, increased labor requirements to open plastic bags, and vandalism of baps placed at the curb. For either collection system, the green waste should be collected once per week The Cin~ of San Jose, California. has examined a monthly pickup of green waste but results indicated a lower panicipation tare for monthly rather than weekly collection. The material that is collected will be delivered to either a transfer station or directly to a green waste processing facility. Collection Alternative Z - Dmp-off Collectioo- A drop-off collection system consists of a site, or sites, where green waste that is generated within the City is placed. Green waste is then transferred to a processing facility (although a drop-off site can be located at the compost processing facility). A drop-off facility can be a flat piece of land or bins where green waste is placed by generators. If the drop-off site is located away from the processing facility, material is loaded onto transfer vehicles. If the drop-off site is located at the processing facility, then the green waste is moved duecdy to the processing area. A drop-off program can be designed to complement a residential curbside green waste collection service. 'Ibis would reduce the number of drop-offs as well as residential traffic to and from the sites. A drop-off program in conjunction with a residential curbside program would primarily serve the commercial, industrial, and self-haul sectors. 5-5 Collection Alternative 3 - lfixed Waste Processing- SCS eN0.4FE9S - A'ith this al[emative, green waste would be coUec!ed mixed with normal refuse and trans- ported to a materials recovery facility (MRF1 where a combination of manual and mechanical sorting would separate the green waste for composting. Experience with the sorting of green waste from a mixed waste strram at a SIRF indicates [hat only a 20 percent recovery rate can be expected. Green waste recoveryy can f>e increased by requiring the use of identifiable bags to contain the green waste and prevent miring with ether refuse. Bagging green waste would limit material contamination and aid in ident~cation and separation. It is estimated that up to 80 percent of the green waste that is delivered to the MRF could be diverted if the grass and leases are properly bagged in a conspicuous manner and the pmnings are bundled together. Other materials, such as food waste, can be targeted for recovery depending on the processing capabilities of the composting facility. Processing Alternative - Creen Waste Windrow Composting- Choosing a method of composting is highly dependent on the material to be composted. As discussed in the section on objectives, the priority material for composting from the City of Rancho Cucamonga is green waste. It is mare economical to compost green waste with the windrow process than other methods such as aerated static piles or in-vessel systems because of their higher capita and operating costs. If the City decides to explore regional co- composting with sewage sludge or mixed organics, then the aher processing methods should be considered, The green waste generated from the City of Rancho Cucamonga consists of two main components, leafy and grassy material that is readily compostable and brash and pmnings which will treed to be size-reduced. The brush and prunings will not decompose as readily and may need to be screened from the finished compost. This material may then be incorporated into a new compost windrow or used as mulch, animal bedding, or fuel. Approximately 40 to 45 percent of the green waste produced by the City of Rancho Cuca- rnonga will rrquirc size reduction and approximately 10 to IS percent will require final use 5-6 other than as compost, such as animal bedding, mulch, or boiler fuel. SCS ENG'iNEERS - [n the windrow composting process, organic materials are placed in windrows (elongated piled that are betwezn 8 to 15 feet wide, 5 to l0 feet high, and as long as necessary'. The size of the windrows depends on equipment used and on local weather conditions. w'inAroa~ composting entails mechanical corning and monitoring to provide aeration and to assure biological decomposition Turning can take place as little as once per year, but to control odors. maintain aerobic conditions, and speed up the biological process, windrows are usually tamed once a week when new, tapering off to once per month as the compost matures. The equipment utilized for composting is largely dependent upon the quantity and type of waste materials to be processed and the area available for composting. After the composting process is complete, funher processing is recommended to xreen out uncom- posted mood chips or contaminants such as rocks, glass, or plastic bags. This fmal process- ing step improves compost quality and appearance, which makes the product more readily marketable. The fatal composting product can be available within 4 to IS months, dependene on how often the compost piles are mm~. Siting Altemalive -City or Regional Sites- The City of Rancho Cucamonga could locate and build a facility just for the green waste generated by the City, or the City may help locate and build a regional composting facility. If the City chooses to build its own composting facility, it may take advantage of reduced transport time (lower cost of transferring the material from collection point to processing location), and there will be local control over the distribution of the compost end-products. However, such a small facility will not likely take advantage of economies of scale in equipment and administration. Table 5-2 dexribes the estimated costs of implementing a local composting facility. 5.7 KS eNGIN EF95 - A regional site has, among other advantages, economies of scale in processing and adminis- tation. The major disadvantage is the greater average transport cost from collection point to processing location. The site could either be on County property, other public property, or priva:e land. The County has indicated the possibility of a regional composting facility at the Milliken landf5tl. There is also the possibility of a regional facility a[ the Chino Basin Jfunicipal Water District sewage sludge composting site. Costs associated with regional siting are enumerated in Table 5-3. The City may be the owner and operator of the site (or partner in a regional site) or it map seek a private owner and~or operator to run a composting facility. A privately owned or operated facility will reduce the need to provide City staff and equipment, may simplify siting and development and place the responsibility for marketing the compost end-pralucts in private hands. Composting sites can be located at unused portions of landfills or transfer stations. This tends to create a more efficient integrated waste management system. Equipment and personnel can be shifted relatively easily between Lmdfill and composting sites, as necessary. @VALtiATIOti OF ALTER*IATIVES Resid o i 1 Curbside Collectian Evaluation of residential curbside collection includes the following criteria: Effectiveness of the p3pp,~. Data from around the country indicates that green waste curbside collection programs in communities with one hauler can achieve 80 to 90 percent participation rates with voluntary programs. With 90 percent participation and a 90 percent recovery rote, appmzimately 80 pen;ent of the green waste that is generated by residential units within the City could be cob IecteA. This would be a diversion of up to 23,Q90 tons per year, 10.0 percent of the total waste generated. 5-8 SCS ENGINEERS - Hazards associated with the pr~pr~rn. Iite hazard of a sepa[ate collection for green waste is primarily associated with Fhe increased refuse [ruck traffic. ° Ability to accommodate than A cufiside program is readily adaptable to changes. • Consequences to the waste trey A diversion of green waste will reduce the amount of organic matter that is landfilled. • TiminP. A curbside collection program can be implemented in the short term. • .'deed for new or expa_~ded fae+GNes. A collecton program will ryuire a facility to process the green waste, which is described below under Processing Alterna- tives. • onsi t n v with loo 1 psr i i < p a•c nd ordi •FF~P<. A curbside program will be consistent with all local policies, plants, and ordinances. • Institutional barriers to implementation. There are no significant institutional bamers to curbside rnllection. • ost of plemenLdon. Based on programs in several other cities, curbside collection costs ate between 560 to 580 per ton of green waste collected. This range includes capital and operating costs. Far the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a residential curbside collection program could cost betwcen 5873,000 and 51,164,000 per year for recovery of 23,090 toes per year. This does not include processing costs. - Av i ab'G{y of m rk ts/ nd-use<. See markets under the processing Alternative. 5-9 56 ENG W EE45 - • 4txratine exye 'ence. Curbside collection ro p grams have extensive operating e.xpenence. Loose collection methods have been used in Sacramento since the late I950's. Containerized collection has been used since the early 1980's. • Reoional annficability. This criterion is not applicable to this alternative. • Public accenranrP. As mentioned above, green waste collection programs hao~e historically enjoyed high participation rates. This is a relatively easy way for people to help with waste management problems. • Social resnons'hility. Source-separated curbside cotlec[ion requires an increased level of social responsibility of all participants. Droo-nft Collection Evaluation of drop-off collection includes the following criteria: • Effectiv nP<c Of [hr,~omera- A voluntary program directed at residential, commercial, industrial, and self-haulers will divert between 5 and 20 percent of the green waste generated by the City. This would result in a diversion of between 1,220 and 4,880 tons per year for a diversion rote of betwcen 0.8 and 3.4 percent. WiN a combination of economic incentives and mandatory requvements, a program for commercial, industrial. and self-haul generators should be able to divert up to 70 percent of the green waste generated by these sectors. This would result in a diversion of approxvnately 4,000 tons per year for a diversion rate of 21 percent. Approximately 80 percent of the green waste produced by maintenance of parks and streets that is not currently diverted could be delivered to a drop-off facility. This would result in an additional diversion of approxi- mately 560 tons per year for a diversion rote of 0.4 percent. 5-10 iCi FNG~NEENi - • Ha>ands as~iated with the program. If green waste is not collected on a regular basis from drop-off sites, problems may occur with odor and vectors (insects. rodents). Proper program management can minimize odor and vector problems. lirattended containers may be vandalized or contaminated with other refuse, including potentially hazardous wastes. Continued contamination may require that drop-off sites be staffed. • Ability to accommodate change. A drop-off center can readily accommodate changes N participation and markets. Additional or different materials can easily be collected with adequate notification to program participants. Locations can be changed as necessary to provide convenience and promo[e the use of the pro- gram. • Conseauen~P to the wa<te stream. This alternative would [educe the amount of organic materials in the waste stream. • Timine. A drop-off collection system can be implemented in the short term. v ~ for new or expanded facil~es. Facility requirements vary depending on the selected drop-off option. A facility to process the green waste will also be needed, but the processing facility can also be used as the drop-off site. Public or private collection sites would need to be identified for sateWte drop-off options. A ceruralized collection facility for green waste would be similar to a transfer facility. The public would be able to drive to the top of a concrete wall and drop then green waste into roll-off boxes behind a retaining wall. The roLL-off bones would be on a concrete pad which would be large enough to allow maneuvering room for the collection wcks. A voluntary drop-nff program will require a facili:p to handle between 1,220 and 4,800 tons per year. If 40-yard dmp boxes are used, then the facility will have 5-ll - s<s rvarrecxs - to be large enough for l2 drop boxes (if removed once per meek), A drop-off program for the commercial, industrial, and serf-haul sectors wiif require a facility [o handle approximately 4,960 tons per year. If d0-yard drop boxes are used, then the facility will also have to be large enough for i2 drop boxes of removed once per week). It may be necessary to have two or three drop-off sites for the volume of material expected to be delivered, or the material can he taken directly to the composting facility by the generators. Consistenev wish Soot iei - plans and o an There are no conflictin_2 City or County policies, plans, or ordinances that would prohibit adrop-off facility, .q use oermit may be needed. If the collection site is considered to be a permanent facility and residual waste materials requiring disposal result from collection or processing, a solid waste facility permit will be required, If no residual waste material is sent to the landfill, then no permits are necessary. • Institutional ba_mers to imy]emenLtion. There are no institutional barriers to prevent implementation of dropoff collection for green waste. • ost of_itllyl m n a ion. Bin service at a drop~off facility is estimated at between SS and 510 per cubic yard (between 525 and 550 per diverted ton). Additional costs associated with adrop-off facility include land, site design, cnnswction !if needed), and personnel for staffing the facility. gvailab~ty of ma_ketc/end-us:. See Processing Evaluation for market availabil- ity. " ChxratinR ex rience. Voluntary drop-off facilities have extensive operating experience in the United States. large sites operated in conjunction with manda- tory participation or landfill bans are not as widely tested. 5-12 CS ENG'iNEERS - • Reeional atrolicability. A drop-off facility can be operated either locally or regionally. • Public acceotance. Drop-off facilities are publicly acceptable it kept clean. • Soc~~al resRonsibility. A drop-off facility will increase the social responsi'oilip~ of all panicipants. `vtixed R'aste Processine Evaluaron of mixed waste processing includes the following enteria: • F~fectiveness of the oroeram. Approximately 20 percent of the green waste generated can be removed from the waste stream by praessing at a MRF. Based on current waste generation estimates, the separation of green waste at a materials recovery facility will decrease the amount of green waste landfilled by 4.880 tons annually (3.4 percent of the total waste generated by the City). Mixed waste processing can also target other materials as markets become available. If the waste is separately bagged, then up to BO percent of the generated green waste could be recovered. An 80 percent recovery rate will divert 18,070 tons per year of green waste from landfilling (12.4 percent of [he total waste generated by the City). In addition, the 560 tons per year of City-generated green waste could be diverted through this facility. This will result in an additional diversion of 0.4 percent of the total waste produced by the City. • xa~a r as~iated with the oroer~. The primary hazards are odors, contami- nation, and vector control. Odor can be controlled by regularly transferring the green waste to a composting facility. This is very important during the seasons 5-13 SCS ENGINEER, - when grass clippings are generated. Vectors will be controlled through proper operating procedures at the !vfRF. Ability to accommodate chanyg. A mixed waste processing facility can readily adapt to changes s processing techniques and material markets. • Consgguences to the waste strea,n. This alternative would reduce the amount of organic materials being landfilled. • Timine. A mixed waste processing facility would require between 3 and 5 years to site, permit, and build. This would be a regional facility requiring a large site and a full environmental impact report. • Need for new or a Handed facilities. A MRF is needed for Wis alternative. • oncict n Kwith Inca! i i - . plane, or~„_ o~ncec_. There arc no conflicting policies, plans, or ordinances that would prevent a D~D2F from being built. A solid waste facility permit wW be rixluired by the C1WMB. Aland use permit may also be necessary. • Institutional barriers to implementation. Residential opposition to siting and the high capital cost may represent barriers to a MRP. • Cost of imp~mentation. The cost associated with sorting green waste out of the generai wasre soearu at a MRF are between S40 and Sg0 per diverted ton. • Availability of markets/end-uses. There is a potential for contamination of the gtcen waste that may limit available markets. See Processing Alternative evalua- tion for general markets. 5-14 .i ENG'~N EEii - • v Yrdtltle CXD2r1enCE. :~:[}IOUgh faCdllleS that proCESS mLYEd wa5[E and Comp05t the organic fraction have been operating in Europe for years, only about to have been developed in the tinned States. Sfost of these facilities compost food waste and ether organics 2s well a; yard waste. • Regional applicability. The large capital im~estment in a bfRF for mixed waste almost necessitates a regional facility. • Public acceptance. If the RfRF is kept clean and sited appropriately, it will be publicly acceptable. • Social responsib~~ty. This alternative will not raise individual social responsibili- ty unless disposers are required to separately bag their green waste. Green Waste Windrow Cnmrwst~9 Evaluation of green waste windrow composting includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the proeram. Windrows are a very effective way to process green waste. llepending on the rate of corning, the time it takes to develop the final product varies from 4 to 18 months. piversion effectiveness will depend on the quantlty and quality of material received at the composting site. • Iia>ard< associated with the proetarn. Common hazards associated with compost- ing facilities are odors, vectors, and leachate. There can be hazards associated with equipment operation, but these will be minimized by properly training the equipment operamrs. The most common complaints directed a[ windrow prmess- es are about odors. This can be overcome by treatment, proper control of site anA process management, or by having a large buffer zone around the facility. Vectors can be controlled by proper coming and moisture adjustments. Trapping 5-IS ICS Eh G'~4EEMS - can also be an affective method of vector control. Tha leachate that is generated from the windrow process can contaminate local water sources. This can be controlled by collecting and treating or recycling the effluent. With the dry weather conditions in Rancho Cucamonga, little to ro generation of teachate is espec red. Various gases that result from the decomposition of organic matter will be released from windrow;. All ocganic matter will eventually decompose. and the windrow process only alters the place and speed of natural decomposi- tion. • Ability to accommodate chance. Windrow composting is adaptable to many economic, technological, and social changes. The process technology is easily altered without major equipment changes. • r_c"sea ec to the wa to stream. A composting facility will result in a de- crease Nthe amount of green waste received at the local landfill. • Timine. A windrow composting operation can be implemented in the short term. Approximately 2 to 3 years will be needed to permit, design, and build the facility. • Need for new or ExQartded facilities. A site will have to be obtained for the composting facility. Approximately 1 acre is needed for every 7,000 cubic yards (1,100 tons) of green waste. The site should have utility access (water and power). A small building to serve as an office, and a restroom should be on site. Bated upon these estimates and an input stream of g0 percent of the total green waste generated within the City, approximately l4 acres (19,510 tons per year. 1,100 tons per acre) will be needed to compost organic material from Rancho Cucamonga, assuming a 12-month composting period. • Consistenev with local ooliciPC plans and ordinances. There are no conflicting policies, plans, or ordinances that would prohibit a composting facility. Depend 5-16 SCi E4GiNFFaS - ing on the location. a permit from the State Regional Water Quality Control Board may be required for disposal of any leachate generated. The C1V.1B will require a solid waste facility permit. The facility may require a conditional use permit, depending on local zoning ordinances. South Coast Air Quality '.fanace- ment District rules regarding gaseous emissions may need to be addressed since the area is a nonattainment district. • Instinnional barriers to implementation. Residents may oppose a compostine facility in their neighborhotd. • Cost of implementation. The estimated cost for a windrow facility is dependent on the size of [he facility (a Local site or a regional site) and is given in the discussion of siting following this section. • Availability of markets/end-uses. The market for compost produced from Rancho Cucamonga's green waste will depend on several factors, including the quality of product produced, demand by local government, demand by state government. and demand by local residents. The compost can be used by both the public and private sectors. As a role, the higher the quality of the compost produced, the greater the number of available after-markets. Different quality products (screened/unscreened) can be marketed to different sectors. The compost product quality is affected by contaminants, process control, ara screening of the fmal product. Contaminants in the composting process are typically weed seeds, pathogens, undegraded pesticide residues, nonbiodegradablc irerts such as glass, and odors. To reduce odors and cleanse the compost of weed seeds and pathogens. the process must be monitored regulazly so that the windrows reach an internal temperature of at least I30°F for 3 consecutive days. Contaminants such as inerts are best kept to a minimum by source-separated collection, but the product can be run through a screener to remove wood chips. plastic bags, and other contaminants that are visually unacceptable to the public 5-17 S:S EN0.NEFR5 - If the compost .ESed for landfill cover then the wood chips and other laree patticles do not need to be screened out. The public a~i(] require ahigh-quali[v product for horticultural use. It may be necessary to give the product away at first [o build up co~dence in the compost. The high-quality compost can be marketed to nurseries, land developers, goU courses, and other private user;. The City may use the compost for public works activities and parks. If there is an overabundance of compost the City may choose to apply the product where it has not been needed, but is beneficial. If all the compost cannot be marketed locally, then the City will explore the possibility of marketing the compost to state agencies. Senate Bill U22 requires that the D^parLnent of Genera! Services, the California Department of Transpor- tation, and the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection use green waste compost. • 9p ra i ex ri n Windrows have been used extensively to compos[ green wastes. • IZgyio a__.n_! aoo i •b'lity, q composting facility can be a local or regional facility. There are economies of scale with larger regional facilities. • ~b i a eo ~ If odors ate controlled, then composting facilities are publicly acceptable. • Social regpon ib'I'ty. Composting and using green waste instead of sending it to landfills is socially responsible. 5-Ig SC5 i4m rvFFxS - Sltin¢ Evaluation of siting includes the following criteria: • ffectiveness of the oroeram. Either a local or regional site would be able to process the yearly tonnages of green waste from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • Hazardc acv,r-iated with th pmt. See this criterion evaluation for the Processing Alternative. • nhihty to accomm •t hanv~. Once a composting facility is constnteted, it would be difficult but cenaWy not impossible to change. All of the equipment could be moved, but money invested in site improvements woutd be lost. • Cons~uences to thew <t c re~ A composting facility will reduce the amount of green waste going to a landfill. • Timine. A windrow composting facWty can be sited in the shoe term. • Need for new or exru Art f 'Imtig,. R'hile a number of variables affect the size of a facility, median estimates on the number of cubic yards per acre (7,000) and the processing time (t2 months) may be assumed to give an approximation as to [he number of acres required for a composting facility. Given the warm climate in San Bernardino County, processing time could be considerably reduced, decreasing acreage requirements. Assuming that a voluntary curbside and incen- tive-based drop-off programs are installed, the average annual tonnage collected will be approximately 28,480 tons per year. Based upon these assumptions, a local site will nced to be sized for; 28,480 Tons x 5 cubic yards per ton = 142,400 cubic yards. 5-19 S.'S ENG'~NEEAS - A[ 7,000 cubic yards per acre, this works out to 20 acres of land for a local facility. To amve at a tonnage estimate for a regional site, the following numbers are used: 84.790 Tons x 5 cubic yards per ton = 423,950 cubic yards At 7,000 cubic yards per acre, a regional facility will need 61 acres. 84,790 tons per year assumes that 80 percent of the green waste from the cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, Chino, and Montclair, as well as from the Unin- corporated County adjacent to these cities, and 70 percem of the green waste produced by the City of Ontario. will be delivered to the regional facility in 2000. When considering the size of a larger regional site, it should be noted that with the equipment identified and active material management, the processing time could be reduced to 6 months. • Consistenceswith local policies plans and ordinances. A permitted composting facility will be consistent with all local policies, plans, and ordinances. • Institu Tonal rri to irtlplfinenfation. Residents may oppose a composting facility ut their neighborhood. • Cost of implementation. The costs associated with a local site just for the City of Rancho Cucamonga are estimated at 9696,000 to 5981,400. This amounts to between 524 and 534 per ton of green waste. The City will be responsible for approximately 34 percent of the regional facility costs/profits based on a total input stream of 84,790 tons per year. Thus, the cost range (excluding collection) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is between 5-20 iC5 Pb'.4FFi5 - 5643,076 and 5931.328. This is between 522 and 532 per ton of processed green waste. • 4vailability of markets end-uses. See this criterion under the Processing P.Itema- tive. • t7oeratine experience. This criterion does not apply to siting. • Regional apoGcabilirv. A composting site could be for local or regional use. • Public acceptance. If appropriately sited with public input. composting facilities are publicly acceptable. • dal resnonsibitity. This criterion does not appy to siting a facility. SF,LECTED ALTER'VATIVES The City has selected the following composting alternatives to help meet diversion goals: Short Term ]. Form a regional coalition. 2. Through the n;gional coalition, decide which process to use (windrow or in- vesseD. 3. Site and permit a regional composting facility. Medium Term I. Implement residential curbside collection. 5-2t - S:Si4GNFeRS- ~. Cnnstmct fdCWt}'. 3. Encourage commercial, industrial, and self-haul generators [o deliver source- separated green waste to the facility. Reasons for Choocinz elect Nteroatives A regional facility was choler, because it wW be mote cost-effective for the region to compost their green waste together than for each City in the area to compost on their own. Curbside collection was chosen because it has the potential to n:move a large portion of :he green waste generated within the City and it will involve residents directly N a solution to future waste disposal problems. Encouraging the commercial, industrial, and self-haul sectors to source-separate and deliver the gnxn waste they produce to a composting facility was chosen because it will be aloes-cost method of diverting green waste from these sectors. Prop_os dg_~ nrk c for Div rted nea.aok .4 green waste processing facility will reduce the volume of incoming material by over 50 percent, but nevertheless there will remain a significant amount of material that will need to be reused. Grass, leaves, and small twigs will compost into a soil amendment that augments soil srmcture and fertility. Typical end-users of compost include nurseries, landscapers, sal growers, greenhouses, golf courses, cemeteries, and farms. Municipalities can use the material internally through parks and highway maintenance programs and it can be sold or given to the public for home use. N some cases, compost can be used as daily cover at landfills. However, special permits are required and regulations may affect how this material is counted towards diversion goals. Processing branches and larger brash yields wood chips that can be used as mulch, a bullcinQ agent for sewage sludge composting, animal bedding, or boiler fuel. 5-22 iC5 F4c HffxS - The City mill maximize its own use of compost and encourage its residents to do the same. while actively workine to develop markets with area businesses that could utilize compost. The City will also work with the state and other cities in the region on joint market develop- ment activities. Proposed ffandline of Material and Disposal of Residuak The incoming yard waste a~W be size-reduced in a grinder. Oversized woa: chips may be screened out of the sue-reduced material and marketed separately. The remaining material will be composted. Windrows will be turned frequently in the fast month and once per month thereafter. The finished compost will be screened and oversized pieces mill be reincorporated into the next series of windrows. The resulting compost will be marketed in bulk. Any residual contaminants such as glass, paper, or plastic that are screened out will be landfiL'ed. Required Facilities A facility to process the collected green wastes will be needed. The site should be loeated away fmm surface and ground mater sources and sensitive land uses to minimize environmental impact. The site should have a slight slope of approximately I to :percent, to provide satisfactory drainage. Generally, the site should have an all-weather surface that has the weight-bearing capacity needed to accommodate the equipment involved ut the opera- tion. A firmly packed surface is generally satisfactory for the storage area. Runoff should not be allowed to enter ground or surface waters. Collected leachate and runoff may either be stored and [[eared on-site or be diverted into a nearby sewer if the local wastewater treatment plant agrees to accept it. .4 site access road, preferably paved to permit year-round use, is needed. Approximately t acre of usable working space per 7.(700 cubic yards of waste (assuming a 1-year processing period) will be needed for the operation. A buffer of at least 2W feet should shield sensitive land uses. 5-23 SCS FNG'iYFERS - Ideally, the composting facility should have on-site water and electrical power, although mdimentary operations do no[ require them. A water truck may be used to moisten windrows if direct access to water is not available. A small office and a sartitation facility for employees are recommended to sen'e as a workplace for administrative activities. an eating place, a shelter in inclement weather, and a stemee site for small tools. A mobile trailer is commonly used. A fence around the zquipment storage area or the entire site may be appropriate. PROGRA.~1 L1~'LEVIE~(TATION The tusks requved to implement the selected alternatives, implementation dates for each ...:.k, implementing agencies, anticipated costs, and proposed funding sources for Rancho Cuca- monga's composting programs are presented in Tables 5-4 through 5-6. Responsibility for initiating collection of green waste and ensuring processing capacity rests with the Engineer- ing Department The cooperation of City agencies and the franchised haulers will be necessary. )tO~TTOR.LYG A.~'D EVALGATION The composting program will incorporate ongoing monitoring, evaluation, and progntm modifications (as necessary) to improve the program on a continuing basis. The Engineering Department will need m maintain records on the number of tons of green waste delivered to pm!'essing or composting facilities, the amount successfully processed, the amount rejected, and the amount used for other purposes. Criteria to be used to determine the effectiveness of the program are as follows: • What percentage of targeted generators participated in the program'! • What methods are appropriate to increase the participation tare? 5-24 • Were [he anticipated diversion objectives obtained? • Did the responsible entities zxecute tasks as scheduled? • W'as the recovered product (compost) successfully marketed° iCi t m vesas - • Were all activities executed in an environmentally sound manner^ Were em~iron- mental impacts associated with composting (vectors, odors, etc.) successfully mitigated? - The Engineering Department will monitor the recordkeeping conducted by the contract hauler, and will be responsible for data analysis, monitoring and evaluation, and annual reporting of program effectiveness. It is estimated that ongoing staff resources of approxi- mately 200 hours (10 percent of one person's time) per year will be needed to moni!or and evaluate this program. This converts to a cost of approximately 55,000 per year, Contineeocv Measures If monitoring of Rancho Cucamonga's composting program shows a shortfall in the attain- ment of green waste diversion objectives, the Engineering Department will reassess the diversion alternatives in this or other components in this strategies that would be considered include: • Targeting additional materials for composting. • Allocating greater resources for administrative staff time and public education and publicity. • Placing (or raising) a user fee on collection of trash and lowering (or eliminative) the user fee on collection of materials targeted for diversion, to encourage participation bt either municipal composting or home composting programs. 5-25 SCE iN0. bE4i2 - • Identify different operating procedures which will increase production. • Manda[ing for enforcing with fines) the source separation of green waste. • Evaluating the feaSibiG[y of composting municipal solid waste. • Identify reasons for ineffective marketing. • Evaluate external markets, and whether demand levels are changing. • Seek alternative markets. • Seek condi[ional exception to regulation as a last resort. 5-26 SCS ENG W FEN$ - I TABLE Sl YYASTE D(VERSIOFI ESTL4fATES IK1R CONING PROGRAMS ~ Selected Composting alternative Short-Term Diversion Estimate Medium-Term Diversion Fstimnte ~ Collection Alternative Residential curbside :ollxtiov 5.500 tom per year 25,0901vns per yea: ~i, Drop-Off i for commercial. ~~ mdusMal. self-haul, and City- generated grin waztei 2, I90 tom per year 5.890 tons per year Total delivered to facilities 6,690 tom per yeu 29.980 tons per yeu Estimated procrssivg losses' 730 tom per yen I.S110 tore per year i Total rontribution to nuadatw 3,5 percent 12.6 percent Ptocessirrp Altarrntires Regional composting fuility 6,360 tom per year 28.480 [om per year Assumes five percent of input material is rejxtrd and laadfilled. 5-27 SCS ENGWFfRi - TABiE 5-2 ES71ifA7'FJ) COStS OF DttPLEMENCATiOM OF A LOCAL COMPOSTA70 FACILITY ltem• Capiul Cost Armful Costs ~ Site Improvemeotsj. 110.000 S IS,500 Pertnirin¢ 10.000 L000 Adrtrinisttativa~Education '_0,000 X,000 Processing 12g.~tg0 TPY ® 520-30%tonl 569.000 - 851,000 Grinder# 200.000 3.000 0.'indrow Tumer 150,000 28.1X711 Frvnt<nd Losder 115.000 2I,tX10 5creener 30,000 5,500 T'OTht. ANNUAL COS[5 fSIS,000 5696.000-981,00D Assumes land is available at no cast. i Site imprvvemerty and permitting arc amortved at 9.5 perrsnt interest (vr 20 yars. # Equipment is atmrtiud at 9.5 pervert interet for 7 ye,ta. 5-28 ENGINEERS - _ _- ~ _ TABLE S-3 COSTS ASSOCUTEB WYI'A A REGIONAL CO11~OSfLtiG SfTE I (Irzn• Capital Cast Annual Costs ~ Slte Improvements, 560,000 5 58.500 I Pcrnuttm¢ 100.000 10.100 :ldmtuistration Education J0.000 I I Processing (91.790 TPY ® S"0-30ton) 1,693,000 - 2.SJ3. 100 Grinder# .00.000 37,O0p windrow Turner 130,000 :9,000 Erootaod Loader 113.000 '_1000 $crxner 110.000 1.100 TOTAL ANM3AL COSTS St.183,000 f1.891,~00-2,739,200 Vote: 'ilia sable represents fobs coat for a regional facility. Local cast depends oo the amount of material sent to the facility and how many other cities participate. Assume+ land is available at no cost. Site improvements and permitting are amortized at 9.3 percent interest for 20 yeah. # Fgmpmem is amortized at 9.3 percent interest fnr 7 yrua. 5-29 SCS ENGINEEaS - TABLE 54 SLfiDHA(tY OF PROGRAM COSTS Program Cost Per Diverted Ton ICI Residential Curbside !5243,000 - 5324.000 at 4,050 TPY1 = $60 - ERO Drop-off Collaiioo !not including design. coosWcdoo, or staffing) = 525 - E~0 I Mixed Wazte Processing (including facility' costs) __-~ _ $40 - 580 kcal Processing fS696.1$00 - 5981,400 at 28.480 TPI~ = 524 - 534 Regional Processing f5 L891,400 - 52,739.200 at 84.790 TPY1 = 522 - 532 S-3G i~~ ^, ~' I ~~ ~ I I ~ I, I ,I = _ ~ ~ ~ x } li i~ ~ I _ - H L ~ Si ¢ 7, - _ r '~ I Z I 11 i q 55~ L [ ~ i . 3 i X X t X k X r 6 ° .,o m ao ~ °p °0 q m ~% Y '~ $ $ ~ c c S ~ `d .7 Y ~,~ m ~ W '~ ~ .. ~~ ~ .~. a v y f M 3 ~ r E ~ V ~ ~ a _ ~ "a ~ ~ ~ E 'r u ~ `o s c o ~ c ~c g ~ F ~ = p ~ • ~ ~ 'J * '~ i a 3 y a m E b ~ o e °° ° 9 c C i$ 2 9 ~ _ "J ' '~ V ~ ~ ~ y j iy .n 6 V z ~ s ~ s C ~ '~ j ~ . ~ ~ ~ 5 6 T d Y ~ 5 00 ~ W W . . W c; '~ . 5-31 ., j ~ = '-" ~ v'' f Y ~ '~ S ~ k I I ~ _ y 2 ~ ~ _ k ~ _ ~ _~ '~ C G ::+ _ - ~ c ? G Z C T -_ V U F - m 3 a ~ L °' c c 2 Z a ~' a 7 0 7 ~ 'E° 0'6 ` ~ 3 3. m a' n ~ ' ~ ~~ .m ~ o ~~ c ~ 2 ~ ,;~ c A m s a' .m .~ ` 'm 'w ~ m ~ ~ ~ a ~ °` °` ~ . m~ ~ 9 ~ ~` 5 ~ L ~ LT 5 C ~ ~ 5 5 '3 5 I ~ c 9 Z s W ~ F ~} 666... g ~ 9 '~ T _P OG O 0 D ~ a. ~ C Q ~ ~ 7 F Y o b ~~ g ~ Q 7 a E c~ '~ ~ o 6 c ti % g o 9 S 3 . 6 j 'J ~ y S ~ C ~ O a ~ 3 3 C n ~o o ~ ~ m Z u = ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ?~ d i 3 3 a S Y r7 a H 5~ .= w N 3 `~ 8 ~ s5 L ~fi aa9 ~ V Y~ U a ~ Wg $ M r 9 ~ e 532 ai iNU NEERS - SECTIOS 6 SPECL4I, WASTES COMPONENT Current AB 939 guidelines require the preparation of an SRR Element Component which addresses the management of special wastes. As defined in the guidelines, spuial wastes are ash, sea~a¢e stodge, industrial sludge, asbestos, auto shredder waste. auto bodies, and ether special wastes as defined in Title 22 of the California Administrative Code. Note that "other" special wastes could include any wastes for which an individual jurisdiction considers it appropriate to plan for special handling, treatment, or disposal, Septage, bulky wastes, or tires are examples of waste types that could be addressed in this section. OBJECTIVES The objectives of managing special wastes are to minimize the hazard potential of any special wastes generated, and to maintain or develop programs to divert them from disposal whenever possible. The following special wastes are either not generated in Rancho Cucamonga or are curtently being disposed of properly and offer no opportunities for additional diversion: incinerator ash, sewage sludge, asbestos, auto bodies, and auto shredder fluff. The following special wastes do offer opportunities for additional diversion: white goods, bulky items, and tires. EUSTEYG CONDTfIONS ExistinY `1c4i~~it~ 8nd Pr~y®y~ The following provides a brief overview of existing conditions and programs related to the management of special wastes. [n several cases the description is limited to an explanation 6-l SCi fNG~NffiS - of why the material is not present in Rancho Cucamonga's waste or why diversion adtema- tives are npt evaluated. .Ash-- According to [he Department of Public Works, no large iuinetation facilities exist in Rancho Cucamonga. Since there is no known generation of ash a~ittin the City, ash will not be considered further in this component. Sewage Sludge-- The CIWMB considers wastewater treatment facilities themselves to be the waste generators. Since no treatment facilities exist in Rancho Cucamonga, sewage sludge is not addressed further in this component. Septage-- Any liquid waste taken from septage tanks or portable toilets must be transported by a hauler licensed by the County and must be disposed of at a permitted treatment facility. The Chino )3asin treatment facility located in the unincorporated area of the Cuunty will take septage for a fee. industrial Sludge-- Any industrial sludge generated by businesses in Rancho Cucamonga is classified as harardous waste and, as such, is handled according to hazardous waste laws, regulations, and permits. Since this material is not disposed of in solid waste facilities, it will not be considered further in this component. 6-2 Asbestos- S:5 Evc vfExS - Astxsms may pose a sienificant public health risk when inhaled or ingested. Asbestos- conraining waste is typically generated during building maintenance, repair, or renovation operations. It is found nn pipes, boilers. ducts, wallboard, ceiling tiles, and Floor tiles. Because of its hazardous nature, asbestos removal. handling, and transport are regulated by the L'. S. EPA, the Department of labor, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. and, most recently, [he SCAQb1D which adopted Rule 1403 that mandates notification and asbestos control procedures during renovation and demolition activities. Ttese regulations require that asbestos generated in Rancho Cucamonga be disposed of only in designated landfills. In Southern California. landfills which ate permitted to accept asbestos waste are BKK m the County of L.os Angeles, and Kettleman Hills in :tangs County. Currently, diversion technologies for azbestos are in an early stage of development and are not commercially available. Because of the regulations mentioned above, and because no asbestos was observed during the waste disposal chatacterizaflon study, the management of this material does not requite additional attention by Rancho Cucamonga at this time. It is therefore not addressed further in this component. Auto Bodies- Historically, the market for spare pans and the high demand for ferrous and nonferrous scrap metal have kept vehicles out of landfills. Vehic;es provide a major source of the ferrous scrap metal currently being recycled. In Rancho Cucamonga, abandoned vehicles are removed by a private towing company when notified by the City. T'he towing service sells the vehicles to salvaging firms for spare pans 6-3 ..i i4G,M1FF95 - or shredding to recycle the metal. Since auto bodies are no[ landfilled, this waste wiil not be discussed further in this component. Shredder Waste Generated from Autos and White Goods-- Shredder waste fFluf~ is material remaining after metallic articles such as auto bodies. appliances, and sheet metal are shredded. The bulk of shredder waste comes from automo- biles. This Fluff consists of textile fibers, paint residue, plastic, rubber and dirt all mixed with engine oil. Although there are disposal problems associated with shredder fluff, currently no automobile shredding operations exist in Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, this waste is not considered funher in this component. White Goods wad Bulky Item White goods refer to refrigerators, washers, dryers, a'rr conditioners, and other large appliances. These materials pose hazards or disposal problems for a number of reasons. Electric appliances produced or repaired prior to 1979 contain polychlorinated biphenyts IPCBs) in their electrical capacitors. PCBs are classified as a hazardous waste. Chloro- fluorocarbons (CFCs), which when released cause damage to the ozone layer, are found in refrigeration and cooling systems. Bulky items refer to wastes too large to fit into a covered 30-gallon trash can, such as furniture made of wood or metal, do-it-yourself construction waste, and upholstered items like sofas, mattresses, and box springs. None of this material is hazardous, but it is awkward to handle and dispose. Appliances and bulky items are currently handled Ut a number of ways i» Rancho Cuca- monga. These items are often mused, either by street scavengers or through charitable organizations like the Salvation Army. The diversion study also indicates that many white goods are rmoved by appliance dealers when they are installing new items. Dealers may 6-4 Si3 iNG meF~S ^ repair the item, dismantle it for parts, sell the meta] for scrap value, or haul the item directly to a landfill. For disposal services. individuals contact the City for an appointment. The City passes the request on to the hauler who sends out a track for collection and may charge an extra fee depending on the circurnstances. in addition, once a yeaz, the City and the hauler conduct a free dump day when residents are encouraged to bring excess waste which has accumulated over the past year to a central location for disposal. Very few white goods and bulky items were found during the Solid Waste Characterization Study. and he: ause of the riming, none of the free dump day material was sorted. The hauler and the City may be able to acquire some information on composition or diversion rates by examining old records. Tirts-- Most old tires are remmed to and disposed of by fire service stores when new tires are purchased. Those businesses which generate large quantities of rims are generally provided with a separate bin for fire collection. They pay a pmmium for this bin to cover an extra disposal charge ai the landfill. The surcharge is expected to increase [0 350 per ton on July 1, 1991, as proposed by the County of San Bernardino. Nevertheless, an undetermined number of tires am set out by individuals for regulaz collection. The City disposes of City-owned tires through its tre distributors who either retread or dispose of the tiros elsewhere. The Solid Waste Chatacter- iration Study found no fees in Rancho Cucamonga's waste, while the other cities in the study found between 0.3 and 0.8 petrent. Additional work may be necessary to quantify the number of tires in the waste sttram. At the present time, diversion and disposal options for tires are limited. An alternative to the direr landfill of whole tiros is to shred them into small pieces. Although shredding does fi-5 ~.> i4G~NEEeS - reduce disposal problems caused by tires Floating to the surface of landfills, potential landfill fetes, and vectors, lire shredding is not an aliematice which will reduce the amount of rtibber products in fandfllls. Currently. Milliken Landfill is stockpiling tires while searching for a better option. One possibility is a cement kiln in the County of San li<:mardino, which has just completed air quality and production tests using whole and chipped tires as a fuel supplement. At full production. the cement kiln could consume up to 1.5 million tires per year. Anticipated Reduction N Existing Diversion All of the programs discussed above will be continued for the foreseeable furore. According- ly, no existing programs wW be phased out or decreased during the short- and medium-term planning periods. DESCRIPfIOti OF ALTERtiATIVFS The City will continue to operate existing programs to divert special wastes. However, alternatives are available to increase the recycling of white goods, bulky items, and tires. Seoante Collection of White Goods and Bulkv Items Additional recycling of white goods and bulky items could be achieved through increased public education and modification of collection procedures. This alternative would ban the material from regular collection containers, and would requme everyone to call the franchised haulers to schedule a special pickup. A dedicated truck would make the collection and deliver the material to the transfer station where recyclable items would be diverted. Markets exist for all metallic materials and then arc potential uses for some wood and plastic items. if the material is collected without compaction, there is potential for repair and reuse of a sigttificant portion of this material. 5-6 T~ iC5 iNG~NEEPE - Because of their size, tires are easily identityn"ed and can be separated from other waste, either by thz generator when setting [hem out for collection or by the hauler at a transfer station. As with bulky items, the City could request that residents set tires out separately and the franchised hauler's trucks could be modified with a tack or hook to carry the two or three tires that might be found along any given route, or the hauler's supervisors could collect the tires in their pirkup trucks as they make they regular rounds. A few of these rues could be di~~erted to retreading or export, but lagge scale reuse will requite the development of neu markets. Possibilities to explore include chipping for IandFill cover, an additive to asphalt er plastic products, or reuse N fire robber. EVALC"ATION OF ALTERNATIVES The changes necessary to implement these alternatives are not substantial, but, where appropriate, the evaluation criteria ate discussed below. White Goods and Bulky Itetas Evaluation of white goods and bulky items includes the following criteria: • fiffectiveness of the vroarant. Because of the timing of the waste sort and the sporadic naNm of the disposal of large items, some additional sNdy will be necessary to specify the portion of Rancho Cucamonga's waste made up of these materials. Other studies have found between 2 and 4 percent. Once separated. almost all of the metallic items can be recycled and IO to 25 percent of the remainder could be diverted, depending on the composition. • Hazards associated with the vronram. The program would create no new hazards and would offer the opportuniry to mitigate some existing ones. When handled separately, appliances could have capacitors containing PCBs removed and 6.7 ~- --~- i:5 i4G4Ee ~5 - disposed of properly. and chlorofluorocarbons could be captured from refrigera- tion units and recycled. • 46ility to accommodate change. This altemative is flexible enough to accommo- date any foreseeable changes. • Consequences to the w~te stream. This alternative will not change the amount or type of waste generated. • Timine. This alternative can he implemented m the short- or medium germ plan- ning period. It could be implemented in 6 to 12 months after the decision to proceed. • Need for exoanded or new facilities. No new or expanded facilities are antici- pated. Minor changes to collection and transfer satioo procedures would be necessary. • Consistenev with local Fans policies and ordinances. This alternative is consistent with local waste management goals. Some minor changes to set-out regulations mould be needed. Iii 4tituiional barriers to imoementation. No institutional barriers have been identified. • Cost of implementation. The separate collection of white goods and bulky items may increase the number of [tuck Mps or change the type of trucks used, and separate handling at the transfer station may increase labor costs. Additional information is needed before such costs can be quantified. • Availability of markets/end-uses. Consistent markets exist for all of the metallic 6-8 + i.`.5 Fv+hFF iS - products that mould be separated. Market development would be necessary for wood, plastic and uphols[ered i[ems. • Qp~ratine exoeFicn~. This material is separated and recycled in many Ia;al'~ies. • Reeional aoQlicabilily. There ate no conflicts with regional application. • PubGe acceotan~g. Full public support is expected. • Social rescansibility. This alternative provides another opportunity for the public to participate in was:e diversion. T'me RecoyCry Evaluation of tiro rxovery includes the following criteria: • Effectivene« of the oroerbm. Tires and rubber products constitute less than I percent of the waste stream in Rancho Cucamonga, so this program will not be a major diversion effort. However, the program could help solve some operational problems at landfills and reduce the potential for rite fuel and vectors. • FIa?a.ds cvrr'arwt wi h h oroela-. No harards are associated with the sepa- rate collection of tires. • Ably to accommod-te ch-eee. This altemative is flexible enough to accommo- date nay foreseeable changes. • on g a es to th w ste c This alternative will not change the amount or type of waste generated. • Tim' This alternative can be implemented in the short- or medium-term plan 6-9 >Ci EYG~h EERS - ning period. It !rould be implemented in 6 to 12 months after the decision to proceed. • Need foe exp~~d.vr or new facili ie . No new or expanded facilities are antici- pated. Changes to collection and uansfer station procedures would be necessary. • Consistency with~ocal plant pol' ira d ordinance . Thic a![ematice is consistent with local waste management goals. Changes to set-out regulations would be needed. • Institutional barriers to imyl m n anon. No institutional barriers have been identified. • Cgst °f implementation. The separate collection of tires could marginally increase the number of track trips used and separate handling at the transfer station could increase labor costs. The increase is not expected to be substantial. bu[ additional infotmatlon is needed before it can be quantit-ied. • Av i abl'ty of ma_rtretc/end-uc.. Markets exist for the 10 to 20 percen[ of the tires that ate undamaged and can be exported or retreaded. New markets will have to be developed for the majority of the rites. • tai ~g eXperiener. This material is separated and recycled in many localities. • l3Cttional avolica~tv_. There are no conflicts with regional application. • Public 3C£~IE71lCg• Pull pubbc support is expected. • Social resnonsi if This alternative provides another opportunity for the public to participate in waste diversion. F-10 SELECTED ALTERYATIVES iCi iNG'~4FF~5 - Of all the special wastes discussed earlier in this component, only white golds, bulky items. and [fires offer opportunities for additional diversion. Because of their size, these items are often handled separately by generntors and franchised haulers for opern[ional reasons and can he di~~erted fairly easily if the benefits are brought to [he attention of the public and waste managers. Accurately estimating potential diversion of these materials is difficult with the data currently available. Because of the tLming of the waste sort and the sporadic nature of the disposal of large items, tires and bulky items did not appear in the samples taken and white goods were found only in commercial samples. Using data from national studies and conservative estimates of participation and capture, this plan projects combined diversion of 0.5 percent per year by 1995 and !percent per year by 2000. The monitoring programs for these materials described elsewhere will allow these estimates to be updated before the end of the short-term planning period. Markets exis[ for all of the metallic products that would be separated but market developmen[ will be necessary for wood, plastic, upholstered items, and tires. These materials will be handled through existlng collection and transfer facilities and residuals from processing will require landfdl disposal. PROGRA.'Vi L~iPLFT7rTITATTON The Engureeriag Department will be responsible for program phutning and implementation, in conjunction with their three waste haulers, The primary task of increased public education will be incorporated into the overall recycling public education effort which is described elsewhere. The City will conduct market development activities lath individually and in conjunction with regional and statewide efforts. Table 6-1 outlines the plan for implementa- tion. F-li ~fO~TTORL~iG A.\'D EVALL'ATIOti SCS ih GYFFFS - White goods and bulky items have been handled separately for many years, but no accurate records have been kept to document types or quantities of waste disposed or recycled. The Engineering Department and the franchised haulers will now specifically recotti all of this material and use this information to update the diversion targets set far this material. Since the majority of this material is probably collected during special semiannual cleanup periods. it will take at least ]year to gather sufficient data. Also, as part of the commercial recycling programs, the City will monitor the amount of appliances or furniture that dealers take back from their customers for cause, recycling, or disposal. It is difficult to establish numerical criteria for judging the success of these programs because so little is known about actual amounts that am diverted or disposed. The teal test will be to survey how much is still going to the Lmdfdl after the diversion programs have been put into operation. If significant amounts ate found, the effectiveness of the public ~ucation and the collection practices of the haulers will have to be reevaluated. 6-12 SCS ENGINEERS - TABLE bf SPECIAL WASI-E LitPLEbff.NTATfON Implemrntstion Tuk ImplementaPion Responsible Cosa Funding Dale Entity Source ~ I. Dnelop wd disMbute informs- July' 1992 -Ongoing Esginxring Cost included in j uon on separate cellechon of white Department public Education j goods, bulk, and tires. The inf~rm~- [ion will be part c(oversll raycling outreach. \fazkct des'elopment activi[ies far fuly :99: -Ongoing Engineering 51,000 of Staff wood. Plastic, and urea. _ _ __ _-_. _ _ Depanmeat Time _ 6-13 SCS ENGINEERS - SECTIOY 7 EDL'CATIOY/PLBLIC LtiFOR~I.4TiOti COAiE'O:V'E,tiT This section describes the various education and pubGe information programs to be developed in support of the speck al[emadves selected by the City to mcee its waste diversion goals. The success of this component is necessary ff the City is to succeed in achieving the objectives of the other, more technical alternatives. Through education and public informa- tion, all participants (individuals, households, businesses, and institutions) will gain the knowledge, understanding, and hopefully, the desire to actively contribute in meeting the City's environmental goals. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Based upon data from the Waste Generation Study, and in conjunction with the combined goals of the other components, the short-term goal of this component is to provide the education public information support necessary to achieve a 25 percent diversion by 1945 and a 50 percent diversion by the year 2000. In order to accomplish this, the following objec- tives have been established: Create an awareness level of 60 percent for all rosidents regarding [he City's rtcycling, compost, and waste reduction efforts by 1995 and a 90 percent awareness level by the year 2000. Investigate the possibility of establishing a "Block Leader" program by 1993 for the support of recycling and source reduction phms. 7-I SCS ENGwEERS - • Develop and have in place recycling. composting, and source %duction educa- tional curricula utilized by 50 percent of all local schools by 1995 and I00 percent by the year 2000. • Establish with the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce a commercial recyclers' forum and a source reduction and recycling awards recognition program for local businesses. • In cooperation with the local Building Industry Association tBIA), develop source reduction and recycling programs targeted specifically at the development and construction industry. EXISTLNG CO~E'DI1'IONS the following provides a description of the existing educational and public information programs and activities which am currently in place in Rancho Cucamonga, and promote source reduction, recycling, composting, and safe handling and disposal of solid waste. ~itv Activities At present, the Engineering Department develops information and produces brochures and other tnaterials regarding local recycling programs. 1'he number of schools aad businesses that have established recycling programs promote their programs in-house. In most cases, the person in charge will also serve as the information source, producing handouts and other approprizte materials. The Stale-certified recycling redemption centers benefit from the promotion and media campaigns administered by the Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling. i-ocal retail businesses which serve as redemption centers are required a designate their pxrticipa- tion in an AB 2020 program. 7-2 ' Sr, ENGINEERS - The local buy-back centers do a (invited amount of advertising and promotion. Primarily. the focus of these efforts is direct advertising to generate specific customers for their centers. Often, the campaigns promote redemption prices. The City promotes recycling and environmental awareness through its newsletter, and encourages public inout on matters concerning recycling and other issues. Counh~ Activities San Hemardino County has an active Education and Public Information Committee with bread representation from cities throughout the area. The primary mission of the committee is to assist the cities and County in achieving the goals of AS 939. To accomplish this, a wide range of programs is being developed, from technical assistance to the establishment of a recycling "hot-line" and appropriate support materials. The City intends to work closely and cooperatively with the County Committee, utilizing as many of the programs and materials as are appropriate for the Ciry's plan. Schoo Several Rancho Cucamonga schools conduct their own recycling programs. Education and information materials are developed and transmitted within each insdmtion. H!!3ittS~`Industrv and .ove r A limited number of Rancho Cucamonga businesses and inshmtions have developed effective in-house recycling pmgrams. As with the schools, the erducation and information materials are produced by each organisation regarding their specific program. ~1~'t Local media have been supportive of Rancho Cucamonga rtcycling activities, drawing from 7-} support information provided by the City. PROGRrl~f SELECTIOti iCS ENG WEEiS - Basal nn data from the Waste Generation Smdy, targeted waste generators were selected for the design and development of the education and public information programs. Based on the type and quantity of waste generated, the following were selected: • Single-family residences. • Multifamily residences. • CommerciaVindustria] generators. • Construction/demoBtion genemtors. • Institutions. PROGRAbt ALTERVATIVFS The following alternatives for the Rancho Cucamonga education and public education component were selected for two key purposes: • To increase overall awareness regarding all source [eduction, recycling, and composting efforts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • To develop specific programs targeted at critical generarors. Inteerated Waste Coordinator In cooperation with the City's contract waste haulers, a position will be estabL•shed to coordinate the various education and public information effons to meet diversion eoals. The person selected will serve as a liaison between the City's franchised haulers, all neighbor- hood associations, school progtams, and the media. In addition, the coordinator will develop and make presentations to businesses and community groups. design and produce all col 7-4 SCS ENGINEERS - lateral support materials for the source reduction and recycling programs, and develop local workshops. Source Reduction Programs Source reduction programs are a critical Dart of all integrated solid waste management techniques. Source reduction is the phrase applied to those procedures which pmcen[ goods and materials from entering the waste stream. Simply put, if there is no waste generated. there wilt be no waste to manage; thus, the necessity of identifying recycling, muse, or disposal options for materials will be eliminated. Source reduction is perhaps the component most directly dependent upon and affected by education and public information programs. However, source [eduction requires long-term changes in consumer purchases and product designs: therefore, an immediate impact in waste generation should not be expected. Education and public information programs encouraging source reduction will be implement- ed in the short term so that the effect of source reduction on waste generated can contribute to long-term diversion goals. "Block Leader" Program The City will investigate [he possibility of establishing of a "Block Leader' support pmgmm for all recyclutg activities. "Block Leader" volunteers will serve as spokespersons in their neighborhoods or multifamily complexes. They mill receive periodic information on the status of recycling programs, and will be encouraged to share the information with the'v neighbors. in addition, the volunteerss can be solicited to stimulate recycling in arras where participation does not meet projected goals. Schrrol Tours In cooperation with the City's franchised haulers, tours will be arranged to provide students with the opportunity to visit the nearby 'vfilliken Landfill and the local recycling processing facilities. Student understanding of the technical and operational aspects of recycling and 7-5 sC5 FNGINEFaS - composting processes is important, not only for their benefit, but to wren them with accuratz. information as they share their knoa9edge with parents and friends. Additional student tours can be set up with local businesses and institutions which have special recycling programs or which process recycled materials. CommerciaUlndustrial fBusinesal RecvcBnf As paR of the recycling component. the Integrated Waste Coordinator would assist in the design. development and implementation of specific business recycling programs. As audits are made and individual programs are developed for businesses, the City will provide support and suggested implementation plans. The actual collection and processing of materials will be the responsibility of the City's franchised haulers. Business Reco¢nition ProQ~m in ca~peration with the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce or other business organizations, the City will establish an annual recycling recognition event, A full spectrum of awards can be presented to those firms establishing recycling and source reduction programs, with special aclmowledgements going to major diversion effons or other significant achievements. Media Advsrt' iu¢ The City will investigate the possibility of advertising in the local press to show the progress and success of dte various recycling and source reduction programs. The "thermometer" type of ads provide an ongoing indication of a program's achievement, while maintaining the awareness needed to secure citizen participation. 7-6 Media Releases '.:5 ENGMEERp - The City a'iU produce and transmit appropriate releass to all media throughout the Rancho Cucamonga area regarding the various aspects of recycling and source reduction programs. Community Events Lt cooperation with its neighborhood associations, the City will take part in promoting recycling at community events. fairs, and other ;Deal activities. In most cases, promotional information will he offered io arerdces. Video The City will produce a video, or series of videos, to use in presentations to service clubs and civic organizations, or for on-av opportunities through local cable T'V operations. In addition to generic information, videos can be developed to target specific groups, such as horse oa-ners and the construction and building industry. SELECTED AL'i'FILYATIVES All of the alternatives described above am selected for implementation. ~fO~TTORLYG A.YD EVALUATION The City of Rancho Cucamonga wi6 be responsible for the monitoring and evaluation of all programs associated with achieving its desired diversion goals. In particular, the attainment of the education and pub& information objectives will be addressed in two basic methods: Surveys to assess the awareness level of the community reganling the various rucycling and source reduction programs within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 7-7 SCS iNGINEEHS - The gathering of specific data to determine the effusiveness of selected alterna- tives to meet their obiutives. Sample surveys will be conducted annually to determine the awareness level of local Rancho Cucamonga citizens regazding rommunity recycling and source reduction activities. When the selected aiternatises are in place, the surveys will attempt to relate citizen awareness to actual participation in the programs. It is important for the City to hive a true picture of the relationship betwcen simple awareness and actual participation. For example, random telephone samplings will indicate awareness as follows: A W AR&'dE5 S/ EFFECT[ V ENES S 0 percent ~ 25 percem No[ effective 26 percent - 50 percent Somewhat effective SI percent - 75 percent Effective 76 percent - 100 percent Very effective Similazly, data ga[hered from actual citizen participation information should signify certain relationships between the programs and citizen awareness. As a guide, participation will be evaluated as follows: PARTICIPATION/EFFECT[ V ENFSS 0 percent - ZS percent Not effettive 26 percent - 50 percen[ Somewhat effective 51 percen[ - 75 pettent Effective 76 percent - 1110 percent Very effective It is important to assess the relationship between the two areas of awareress and participa- tion. A high awareness and low participation would indicate a wealmess in the operational structure of a program. 7-s - SCS ENGIN EFNS - Low aa~areness and low participation indicates an ineffective education and/or informational p,ogram. The following monitoring plans mill be utilized nn an annual basis to audit each of the specific education and public information programs in order to determine their effectiveness in achieving the desired goals: Nei hborhood .4ssociation "Block Leader" Program • Name of neighborhood participating. • Number of voWnteers in each neighbofiood. '.. • ?lumber of contacts made by volunteers. • Number of reports transmitted to volunteers. • Program participation rates in each neighborhood. School Tours • Name and numbe: of schools utilizing materials. • Number of classes within each school (grade levels). • Number of students in each class. • Total number of students taking field trip. Business RecvcBn¢-Source Reduction Recoenition Award Proavm • Name and number of commercial/industrial ttxycling programs established. • Speck diversion data (from haulers) of constntedon/demolition debris programs. • Details of event: who what, where, when, how. • Awards presented (results of achievements). A • Plans fcr continuity. _ Number of businesses nominated. • Number of businesses eligible for consideration. 7.9 .CS FNGiNEEgS - Should the monitoring of diversion objectives indicate a shortfall, the measures discussed below wiil be implemented. \eiehborhood Association "Block Leader" Prnaram Should the proposed plan of obtaining a "Block Leader" fall short, a general appeal will be made ;hmugh all appropriate channels (media, service clubs. churches, etc.l for volunteers. In most communities where the Block Leader Program has been effective, volunteers have been independent of local organizations. School Tours If desired objectives fall short, meetings will be set with school teachers and administrators to determine reasons why site tours are not meeting objectives. Rosiness CommerciaUindustria! RecveBna CommerciaUindustrial recycling is a major factor in achieving the City's overall diversion goals. Should the efforts of this component fall short, a variety of plans will take effect. • A volunteer group of business leaders will Ce sought to work directly with the City's Integrated 'cVaste Coorclinator to develop and expand programs. • Rate swcmres will be evaluated to encourage recycling. • Business licensing and fee stmctures will be evaluated. • An ongoing campaign to recognize leading business recycling programs will be I Ilstlmted. 7-!~ SCS iNG~NEERS - SL:~L~L4RY OF EDtiCATTOti/PCBLIC L\'FORYIATION COYtPOVENT In order to be effective, education and public information activities must be flexible. Programs must respond quickly to a particular need. Activities must address specit-ic shortfalls or desired expansion of a plan. Cost-efficiency is vial. Cate must be taken to not spend unneczssary dollar where efforts are successful and goals are being met. Similarly. critical monitoring must be done to pinpoint program areas that need additional support of education antL'or pubGe information. The administration of this component mill be a kev factor in the success of the City of Rancho Cucamonga source reduction and recycling plan. 7-tl ~' ~ ~,~Y :y v _y s. } ~ _k ~I 3 ~ ~ ~ -~ n N I N ~ e ~ i Q ~ I _ s < d = ! 7 5 c ~ y ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ u ? ~ ' q 3 3 .. ,, e 8; 3 ~aa 8~ ~ =u m ~E O V .Q e ~L ~ a ' y C V y try ' J3 r ~ 7 D '~ ~', ° O .L ~ ~ - ~ 5 ~ ~ ~' v ~ ~ w c F < ~ v x E ~ ~' ~ 6 ~ ~ u ~ a. r 3 ` k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N v ~ ~ o fi 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a s 3 5 y+ d ~ ~ s e 3 d4 ~ ~ d'S ~ ~ ~ b H m a ~ `0 ` m 5 r.8 `d o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ y ~ s E x z W ? _ _ o '- 2 a ;N ~ ~ u Z d 6 Ly d 6 ~ ~~ 0 X~ -. i t )-~Z L I S U I u J? ~ ~ X ~ I gel ~ ~ y I ?;:~ I * w ~ ~? ~ E ~jY' :° pp~~ O. 3 > I ~ 3 v z o = P, m _ - > F < a _ ~ ~ G ~ J 3 ~ ~ r~ ~ r ~ ~ 3~ ~ ~ 3 a B 2 3 ~ as < ~ 8~ Y ~ ;02 r v m~° mY ~ 3 ~ ?. ~ D _ ~% J I ~' ~ e . ~ E E j ~ d _ ' ~ ~ e ~ 6 ~ a ~N ' 6 Jf ~v `b e ~ ~ ~ n ~ b.' a ~ c u c m " .- c '~ 3 ¢. a < .~ R ° I s F s '~ 's y 2 ~ _ ~ ~ k 's ~ a u ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ p 2 P °v `i g' R 7 s x r ~ a f om 8> d ~1> 7-13 SECTIO\ g DISPOSAL FACII,FfY CAPACITY CO~D'OVE.\T L\TRODL'CTIO~ SCS ENGINEERS - This component of the SRR Element estimates the amount of landfill space required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to dispose of solid wastes that will be generated for the next 15 years, starting in 1991. No disposal facilities exist within Ute City of Rancho Cucamonga; hence, under agreements between the City and its franchised haulers, solid wastes are exported to IandFills in other jurisdictions. The volume of exported solid waste is considered to be equal to the IandFill space needed by the City. EXISTLYG PER.Y9TTF.D SOLID WASTE FACILITIES There ate no active, permitted solid waste landfills or trursfonnation facilities within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It is estimated, based on waste hauler survey information, that approximately 95 percent of the waste collected within the City of Rancho Cucamonga is disposed at the Milliken landfill, located in the City of Ontario. The remainder is disposed at the Mid-Valley and Colton Landfills. AB 939 regulations requite the jurisdiction to identify and describe all existing permitted solid waste landfills and transformation facilities within the jurisdiction. However, because then; are no permitted solid waste landfills or transformation facilities within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, no further discussion is provided. ~~: 8-I ADDITIOYAL DISPOSAL CAPACITY FEEDS PROJECTIO\ SCS FNGINeFFS - The needs for addi[ional disposal capacity in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are projected for the next l5 years, beginning N 1991. using the formula which is shown below. ADDITIONAL CAPACITY = [(G + q - (D + TC + LF - E)j Where: • G = The volume of solid waste generated within the City of Rancho Cuca- monga. • I = The volume of solid waste imported to the City of Rancho Cucamonga from other jurisdictions. • D = The volume of solid waste that is generated within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is diverted from Lmdfills. • TC = The [eduction in the volume of solid waste generated within the City of Rancho Cucamonga through permitted transformation facilities (incinera- tors). • LF = 'fie available permitted facility disposal capacity within the City of R- ancho Cucamonga. • E = The volume of solid waste generated within the City of Rancho Cuca- monga and exported ro solid waste disposal facilities through inter;uris- dictional agreement(s) with other cities, counties, or states, or through agrc tents with solid waste enterprises. 8-2 SCS ENGIh FFPS - The volume of solid waste being generated each year, beg'vuting in L991. was calculated from the 15-year waste generation forecasts found in the Solid Waste Generation Studies report for the West San Bernardino County Coalition, prepares by SCS Engineers, Starch 1991. Tonnage figures found ir. the waste generation studies were concerted to volumes usine a density of 1,300-pounds-per-cubic-yard, in-place density for tandfilled sotid wastes. This density was obtained from the Los Mgeles County Sanitation Districts. The volume of diverted solid waste was calculated by assuming that diversion goals of 25 and 50 percent would be reached. In calculating diversion volumes, incremental increases in diversion were assumed to be 5 percent per year. starting in 1991, over a IO-year period. Diversion goals of 25 percent and 50 percent would therefore be met in 1995 and 2000, respectively. For the years 2000 through 2006, a constant diversion rate of 50 percent was used. The slight increases noted in diversion after 20(10 are due to projected increases in population and commesial activity in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Since the City does not have an export agreement with another jurisdiction, the City will need additional disposal capacity as shown in Table B-1. Currently, all solid waste generated within the City is exported to facilities N other cities through agreement with the franchised haulers operating in Rancho Curatnonga (R'estem Waste Industries, Rancho Disposal, and Yukon Disposal). 1ltere ate no phms to establish new disposal or transformation facilities within the City in the short- or medium-term plaruting periods. The projected closure dare of Milliken Landf-rll is 1993. The County plans to send half of Milliken's waste to the Mid-Valley Landfill and the other half to the Colton landfill. The facility permit updates for those landfills will address any potential impacts to adjacent jurisdictions. 8-7 u? ~ o o _ _ n _ ~ C ¢ .. x ~ ~ ., \ N k - - '-~ - - _ '' ~ ° aS vry p p Z 'x .. .J v ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ p p p :i ~i ~ -' O ~_> ^ ~O ~~Z Qo 0 0 ^~ ~ L 2 p n p ._ o o c o 0 0 0 p u U Z J ~ U Z __. .. ZZ ~' F - -.. _ .,. Q 2 '~ p p p O ,~ ~ p ~ O O O O O O O v J O ~ ,a Y is n ci ~ S~~ ~ p o p Z "~' 'J n a e ~ ~ ~ :o a ~ ~. phi ~(ippn ~ ~ ~ /~ W ~ d W 41 Ot ~ - ~ N G ? N N N o _ ~ ¢m~ (N] ~p ~f n T ro N (~' Z N .'M ~ ~l C p a ~ ('1 O j O N N N h w ~' Q O ° o 0 o p o 0 0 - ~ ° o 0 o p p p a a ~ C7 ~ p N ~ m m v D H ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ N ~ ~ m ~ ' V b - N N N O N N Nr. C ~ ~ `~ 'J .-. N N N O O p N N 8-4 SCS ENGINEF qS - SECTTOfi 9 Ff.?F-DL\G CO~~IPOYF,.\'C I\'IRODCCTTOY The funding component ptsents the costs of the entire SRR Element. These costs, and the determination of the revenues needed to offset the costs, ate an integral part of the evaluation of the program alternatives. This section presents cost estimates for planning, development, implementation, and maintenance of each of the programs proposed in this Element. Current methods used to fund refuse collection services are also described. OB,iECTIi'ES The objective of this section is to identify sufficient funding sources for all programs. Waste collection service fees have been strucmted so that they are sufficient to cover the costs of waste collection. A separate fee has been establishes to pay for platning required by AB 939. Throughout the short- and medium-teen planning periods, some programs will require significant capital expenditure for facility construction or the purchase of equipment. 'T'hese implementation costs, as well as ongoing maintenance and operations costs, have been recognized and planned for in the Funding Component. 9-1 E-YI5TLr'G CO\DI1T0\S Residential Service iC5 ENGINEFFS - The City Manager's Office is responsible for administering agreements with its franchised haulers. Rates are uniform throughout the City, and tare increases are adopted 6y a Ciry Council resolution. These increases have historically rcftected change=_ in landfill tipping fees and the Consumer price Index. The current service fee is 5;5.20 per month, which is billed quarterly lry each of the haulers. C_o_tt~;nercial Service Commercial franchise agreements are nonexclusive. The rotes are uniform throughout the City. Rates ate reviewed annually, and increases ate adopted by City Council resolution. The same three haulers that provide residential service compete with each other across the entire Ciry. COSTS Table 9-1 shows the estimated costs that will be incurred by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for all phases of program implementapoa during the shots-term planning period (1941 to 1995). The cost estimates presented in Tables 9-1 and 9-2 are based on descriptions of the programs in this Element, and include the time spent by Ciry staff to implement these programs. btany of the programs presented in this SiiR Element require expenditures for public education. For the purposes of Table 9-1, costs for public education and information programs for each component (such as recycling and composting) have been included in the Education and Public Information Component. 9-2 SCS iNG~NFERS - Several general assumptions have been used to calculate program costs, as follows: • Major equipment purchases are not presented as capital expenditures but rather as amortized costs. • Equipment is fmanced at an annual interest rate of 9.5 percent over a life of nears. • Cost projections are adjusted for an inflation rate of 6.5 percent per year. • *abor projections include a 5.5 percent salary increase per year. • No site acquisition costs have been included. as it is not (mown whether prr~ate or City land wW be used for a facility development. • Where costs ate presented in the component sections as a range, the higher figure was used. Note that Table 9-I assumes that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will incur all costs related to development and operation of materials recovery and composting facilities. The costs to the City will be substantially reduced if neighboring jurisdictions share m the development and operation of the facilities. FGNAING SOURCES A primary objective of the Fandin¢ Component is to ensure rti•r p^a,..--„ w,., as paid oy revenues colleMed from the users of the programs. This basic svategy provides the integrated programs with the flexibility to function independently, and eWninates the need to rely on the success n(other programs. 93 Cser Fees iC5 ENGINEEii - Cser fees for residemial and commercial generators mill be increased to provide funds to pay for the selected programs as established by AB 939 requirements., .4ny funds from State grants or financial incentives will be used to offse! the size of the increase. Estimated rate increases are shown in Table 9-2. Table 9-2 shows that program costs are directty offset by the rate increases. These increases will be used to pay for AB 939-mandated programs only; waste collection service fees are not addressed in this document. State f rants and Financial Incentives The recycling progmms described N this Element may qualify for funds from the State. The CiWIvffi and the Department of Conservation award grants and low-interest loans for which Rancho Cucamonga may be eligible. ^.Jhile these funds will help to offset the costs of the programs presented N this Element, they cannot be quantified at this time. California Senate Bill 1322 introduced the concept of Recycling Market Development Zones, which encourages cities or groups of cities to establish geographic areas specific to recycling- related business activities. In order to be eligible for Stale recognition as a Recycling Market Development Zone, these businesses must use recycled material as a feedstock N their manufacturing processes. State incentives include the following: • Low-interest loans of up to 1 million dollars, or one half the cost of a project, whichever is less. • Preference when the CIF'MB awards research and development funds through the Resource Conservation Division's Research and Development program. 9-4 SCS ENGiNEi AS - • For businesses, tae credits of up to 5250,000 to be apphed to the purchase of equipment which uses recycled material. Local incentives may include the following: • Streamlining the permit process. • Provisions for increasing the amounts of recycled feedstock available for inndustrv or providing industry with a steady supply of consistent quality feedstock. ~Iunicioal Bond «~ Table 9-2 shows the costs of the SRR Element programs to the franchised haulers and the City Since fees to 6e collected will offset implementation costs, issuance of debt by the City will not be nece_sary. CO\'TINGEYCY SOURCES OF FUYDING Although it is expected that the programs will receive sufficient funding through the sources discussed above, the following sources of contingency funding have been identified and may be used, if necessary: • Issuance of industrial revenue bonds for wnswction of composting and materials recovery facilities. • City surcharge on refuse collection and/or disposal, • Increased franchise fee. • Increased business Ucense/pennit fees. 9-5 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ a x - x j _ I - r, a ~~ ~( I ~ }f Y O - N N Jl A w1 z x ~ .i y pn~ rv o ~ ~ N N NW" W T Q z d ~ w.. Q ~ 'S, ~ 25 ~ Q 2f r $ a2 ,. - w % ~ _ rv a Q 25 ~ QQ N r E 4 •A ~ p v ~ Y y a[ z 5 J ~ 3 < A u d ~ C V 5 0 ~$ E 'a t a s E m 2 9-6 b ~ x ~ r ~ ~ _ I ~ _ ? M T ~ , I a l _ rv 4 Y z ce " a .. a Y S d n N I >~ U J i ~ ~ I ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ $ ~ r } i _ • x - ~ » P d "+ ~: - i py d p ~ ~ Q 25 Q 25 ~" ~ '~ m d ~ ° $ m a p m N pN P ~ F trF U ~ pp 0 t~ 'S E ~ 25 ~ M ?` tR . r N = N O a p _P S q T N pp K a` ~ ~ ~ ~ e } S1 ~ ~ ~ S _o'~ 6 _`e z G V IlI l ~ IY _~ V ~ ~ j ~ oc ~ ~ ~ v 3 ~ 3 ~ ~ 3 e 8 6 sl N o a R e ` ~ ' oc ~ ~ [- ac E = a a N t `~ q N e $ N 3 N !) '1 ~ V ij a $ o ~ e ~ e y - 8 a e 2 i7 ~ _ Y k ' ' .. ~ 3 ~ °° u e N 3 e eo E C q 3 ~ ~ C ~ r 9 '~ T 9 e C ~ $ ' < a o .. .. ., 9-7 SCS Fk G~NEERS - SECTION 10 PLAN L\TEGRATION CO~fPO\'E-~iT L~TRODi: CTION In this Component of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element, all of the selected dicer Sion and disposal strategies are drawn together into an integrated plan which meets the man- dated goals of 25 percent and 50 percent diversion. As shown in Table 10-1, these programs together will result in the diversion of 25 percent of solid waste landfilled by 1995 and 50 percent by the year 2000. :1CHIEVE.~:~T OF AB 939 DIVERSION TARGETS Through the planning process described in the preceding components, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has selected a number of source reduction, recycling, composting, transforma- tion, and landfill disposal programs which have been integrated into a strategy ro achieve maximum diversion and environmentally safe disposal of solid waste into the next century. A concise list of programs which make up the City's solid waste management strategy is provided in the Executive Summary. Maximization of Diversion Fach of the diversion alternatives was evaluated to determine which programs the City of Rancho Cucamonga has the knowledge, authority, and/or resources to implement at the present lithe, and which programs require additional study or pilot-scale testing, Iegislatise changes, or facility constmction. As indicated m each of the Component descriptions, programs for source reduction, recycling, composting, and special waste will be integrated m 10-I iC5 ENGINEEiS - maximize diversion of waste from disposal. By the end of the medium-term planning period in the year '000, at least 50 percent of the current waste will be source-reduced.:ecycled. or .ornponed. Diversion Potential of Individual Proerarns Table l0-! shows the estimated progress of each progtartt in meeting the ?5 percent diversion target by 1995 and the 50 percent target by the year 2000. To estimate the diversion rate for materials in the curbside program, once it becomes fully operational, the following assumptions based on current waste generation information are used: Capture Rate z Participation Rate =Diversion Rate "Capture Rate" is the average percentage of a given material that participating generators can separate from they waste stream. "Participation Rate" is the percentage of households attempting to recycle at least monthly. Determination of Comtwoent Priorities Throughout the planning process, the City of Rancho Cucamonga kept the waste management hierarchy of source reduction, recycling/composting, and transformation landfill clearly in mind. Source reduction programs will be fully implemented whenever possible, as they eliminate both collection and processing costs and conserve material resources. Waste which cannot be eliminated will he recycled or composted whenever practical. In general, if an item can be reused for material in its present form, it will be targeted for recycling rather than compxting. However, some paper products may be shifted to composting, particularly if they become contaminated with food. Only waste which cannot be economically recovered will be relegated to disposal through transformation or landfill. ! 0-2 Integrated Implementation Sched~t SCS EHGiN FFFS - Tables 10-2 through 10-7 show the schedule of all implementation tasks for new and eCpanded programs, for each component, by planning period, These tables include a descriptive title for each task, identify the entity or enti!ies implementine the task, show start or milestone dates, and funding source availability. 10-3 c J z 2r Q~ Y _o s d w O z s 0 s O 3 z 3 2 G 3 0 3 3 ;~ ~ ~ .. _~ _ _ _ ~ as a .. - 3 ~' ~ •f ex f E.¢f n s ;- _ S, neap msnn~ ~ - ~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ f % _ _ L ! _ _ o ~ =$_ ~_~ _ =_' _ ` 1% % R = _ ,x ; ~O i j .. m. -i ____ o~ 3 i ! _' i$ 3 ~ z _~ i _- r D= -- _ - z, %% _ " ~ _ ~ ~~ 8 x ~ z, nRRR ax%%% ~ -~ ~ 3 i .~.._ s ~ o .Yi i3 F ~~ f% % % c O F i _ = y~ u nn S ~< o E ~3~%%% %%%%% -_3 S -" ~ ~ ~$R m-e'vorv ~~ Jd ~ _ ~ Y a~z o D :^ i nrv ~ 00 0~ ~~ S z`- ~~`. ~j - O `% tin S ~5 a % X%%%R __ ,__ _ c o _' _ y ~J ?i of ^ z12 ~ i _ m '~ :~ ~ ~ Sao J < 3i ~~ ~Rm8 i '~ e Ea - - ~ 4°~ ~ = ~ °~ _oV ~ Y~ _g ka;° ~ ~ Y aar ,-o ~,.~- _ _O 1 J - _ ~ i ~ j ~ - - 3 ] o _ 1 1 _ ~ z9 z6~R;! i ~ - - a "' %R%{ %RRRf - _ f%t% R%RJR AR%I `- s g naa, nnea. - ~zo_ .,,.~ as=~ a '• - - : ?l RRR% R%RRR `;i ~ '_ _'a %fR% Y#FOY >RJ< -_3 - E i3 383n &983$ ~yo ? _~ 883$ ipini '~_ a J S G Z a ,~ _ ~ 2 ~ - GZ_ - -~ a 3j 8838 88888 ?''='z ~? s ~3 3888 88888 *Y,a9 ___ ~ i ~_ °'u z ° ___ -__-_- _ 3' _'_ 8888' $ ,% 0 5' ^~8 ., -:Y~a ~-_ , 5 a 3 Y u ~ ~ 33LL %fnn RARnR ~ St .,,.± ...RR R=RM _ - a S~ c ~ 'i e i 33 i i i r i ii ~ '. _ i 2 E %%%% R%%RR o~~l b E SA MRR% fRR%% aR%R ~~~ z 0 ~ ~ z°~ ~ J ~ ___ 3 o~m o ~ '=__ - _ ~ ~l'o%RR XRRR% iZ : A ru%% eooc' an~' _ _ _ - --~ _ _- - - _ < _ ~ x _ '- _ -- _- - G - - ., _ s ~ _ ___ - - _ _ Z ~ ~ v ° ' •'y n - i .s 33- °8 BRhR° R ri o 9~ 3~ R~~R, ~a.~~ a _ ;3 '_ ~ i m e i ~ a _ - `35~ ~' = of -~". - - `_ o ia3~~ 3~y z ~ -ia~~E 'fi'x - ° -a Ngas~~ '_ o =33553 ~ S~d~gs 7 ' L E 7~ ... w ~. 3 ~ z: o L ~i~i~i z.gia'2S '" i i~v iai-`u i3-'33i " ` - q - ] f" ] ~ ~ F ~ - _. _ ias 0 c a M - - -a.' n C - I P i ~• t+Nt fxxNN /xxx ~~ ~Y as r~$i i E ~ >>.~ ~ ~ S e - S i_ F x ` -s ... ~.~ -:~_ ~ ~n _ e 3 - i E ~3 ea'3' o<a'' ?E ~ ~ _ _ $ v-= xxx xxx,a s 3 . :.- ,,. ,. 3 i a ~S SA - n-___ , 53 J - E ~ '~ ~ rvn~ vPfN - U S a• i S U f 9 ¢a < ~ 5 ~ N i ~ ° 3 x x} xx I~e xxxx S~Sv S" ~SS i S o~ '~ ~ 3 ° i . x~Rx xxx~ S ~ ~ S j e t soon e ~ i S S S$$, 3 ~ i : i'Y+ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ___ a -b _ _ _ ~ 3 5_ fxH IxKt ~ o s z~ - ? 5a i i _ '~ ~ $ d ~ _ ~I ____ -_ - as - - - F °~ ~ = t3 ' -- ~ s 3 ~ ~ Ss~ R R. S eRry~~ r~n ~ ~ o ~p R~^ 8.°;_~ s"~' - ,. n , , , a i a yy c E ;~~ $ 3/ p S~~r$a '~~e8 i~ o u n 3 - P3 3 n e 3 x i E i _ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ a n ~ ~ i as v~wi ~: _33~N 2 c' !i;fE __ - SS 2 2 3 E~ Sj25_ ' 2 ~ ~ -~2 EG" - ' < i ~ ~ o ~ i ~ i - ~o-e =n _ ? ~ ji z - ;~ _ = ~_~ ~ ~n^ a-n-v n^.,. _ ui D t3{ _ i z __ _ x _ _ ~ __ ; 5 - _ } - i_ ff~IN R~flk MY~YM A} "^ c - _ 3 t~ epee ,~;SS .~.,~, :: ~ - - ~ _ % - _ = 2 - - ~ 2 _ __ 2 __ ._ _ __ - R _ ~~ ~, i ~ ~5 ° z 3 ~; 3 5 Y ~~ ^ r n - « - ., ,. ., .. .. ~ 3 ~ i _ - , L ~i a~= ~ ~~ ?ag .... toga"- n• a~ n"- - _ - -E : v x ? 3 ~ o ; s _ _ . _~ ' O _ < .~ . ~ _ - _ z _ ~ ~- ~ ~ -,~ 3 oy aR ~RoR _ _ _ __ ~ 'te '" a _ a. ry_ __ - G - Y lz ~ ~ i a~ -~r~ o z R' ~ _ _ __ • - S 4¢ " i ~~ %, o ~ -_ ~ ' ~ i i D ~? i c3 V ; l ~ ? # _~ ~ W ' - - z ~ as a S ." - ° : ~ - s 5 5 _ _ z G $ ~+ i E ~ s 3 3 5 $` i 3 ~~p ' - qe;;= : ~ < u - ~~ ~ l <i.5ia<suib' ui ai37 Y -^ - n _ 3 y ~ - `z $ < e "' 3 i - _ _ _ _ 9 o ~ ~ ICI I - f ! , ''~ I t I ~ ' j i -"' - i; ~ - i i ~i ~ Ali - r ~ I i ~ i ~ _ ~ ~ o~ 7 i ~ b L ~ Y V L y L_ y t! { V~ ~ Y ~ } 6 u ~ ~ e Cq '~ '~ ~ J ¢~ ~ J F C e 6 F E ~ T Y ~ ~ _$ y i ~ 3 ~ 3 ~ a ~ Y ii yy yy 3 ~ 3 T d T T ~ ~ to 9 ~ T y ~ y 3 ~ y ~~i 4 W i ~ ~ L r y 6 O J ~ ~ G. C Y 9 9 'G ~ i ? `v ~ ~ ~ C ` c ~ ~ b i k i ~ C !i 9 i' ° c d3 ~~ 'N ~ J~ ~~ 10-B r- i I' i !~ j ~ i ~ T ~~ -- f I I t ~~ ' a - " I ~ ~ ' a ~ I ~ ' a 9 1 a I . 'I ~ ~ - ~ = a _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ s x a ~ ~ x ~ ~ I, ~~ l ~ ~ x , l ~ , ~ ~ ~ x k~~ x ~ ! -, i , ~ ~c I L i r r r ~ - I ` I ` '~ I V i Z S ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ = 2 v _ ~ ~ ~ b 6 I i` T i l ~ r = .". _ ~~ i i I L i I I i i y `~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ' ro ~ C N ~ ryp T N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ' ~ p 'J• ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~J. S ~ s - x l s l 3 ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 5 5 P 5 ~~ ? ~ ? t I } ~ `I . ° v _6 a I S @ 5 5 S ~ ~ f ~ ~ F E f ~ ~~ I ~ ~ I 3 a ~ F ~ ~~ ~ y E ~p 8 ~ P < a ~ y ~ 8 ~ :~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 3 !' ' j S = ~ z a m D 3 s 3 3 3 r 3. _I C ~ ., ~ A '~ ~ a `~ u ~~ o ~ ~ 8 G ~ $ t ~ ~ u '- ~ ~~ ~ 3 i ., L F . i - i x 'u = y z = m = _ _ = = _ em _ - u ~ S "s m e ~ ~ ~ - n a ~ °- - a ~~ y 4 .~ 9 '' ~~ a 2 ~ r ~~ o ~ I 0 ~ 7 ~ 3 a u ` ~ y : a ~ o a ? ° '~ 'a ~ $ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ a ~' ~ ~ ° ~ ~ f ' ~ ~ y ~ e " ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ . 5 ~ I _ I = y ~ ~ ,sy ~' e ~ o ~ o ~ ' ~ ~ y ~ ~ 3 j ~ 2 s ~ 7 ~ '- _ 3 ~~ & ~ y a i ~ ~ oc 6 ~ c ~ Z ~ ~ ^~ 'y 6 E 'o ~ X S ~ X I (}q i o II II ~~ i i ~ ~' ~l ~ ~ ~ I v ~ - ~ ~ I ~ i 9 I I, _~' a i ~ 'i: y ~I x i it ~ - r ~ ~ ~ Y _ K - t Ir^ I. ~ ~' ~~ ' ~. ~ ~ ~'.I i I i i I ~ T F :0 ( T I :J L a( I ~! ~ _ '~ Q I y a l _b q rt ~ l ~ Q L ~ f i ~ ' i f j ~ of s ~ ~ f ~ < ~ T T E ~ ~ U - ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ` q - ~ F~ y 3 3 e 8 ~ S [~. { ~ i e 9 3 ~ 3 ~ 3 n r '3+ T f 3 s ~ 3 n ?~ n r ~ W a ~ '= ;~ 2 e ~ n 3 2 3 e ~ ~~ ~ ~ 3 -e ~ r c ~ 2~ ° J 9 ° ° 2 S S - CQ~? m n 7 O s U ~ L y a C pp ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ e r a i _ .~ ~ y ~ l ~ A - ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ .G ~ T 9 I ~ ~ 'o u ~ ~ = ° 3 ~ C ~ ~ ~G a ~ ~ u '~ .. 2 ^ 9 ~ ~ ~ g 3 ~ I _ G -„ '=J 4: ~ y ~ 3 u u a - ~ ~ _ y n ~ - B 8 . B e , x 3 x d~ t~ 10-10 ~' , I i I s . ~ I f tl xl I _ d I "I i _ _ ~ I ~ ? ~I 8 .: 3 I I II II ~ I .. _ I I I _ % ~ x! _Y, x I _} P k I~ r X % a X I } I z I i ,, z ~ s G' > _ _I _ ~ k k i ~ ~ I m - m I= i ~ k ~: - ' ~ I I ~' ~ k ~ ~ l w - ~ l w o m I,~ m I w ' I i :c ~ LI Y _ _ .I v' ~ :0 ~ y I ! ~ b ~ v ~ ~ w y :_0 ; o ]_0 ~ ~ V Y! i ]_0 i ~ J y l~ I Y N i L x I ~ x X ~ Z Z ~ i I I f I Q i i II d. ~ r ~ ~ ~ 2 II T ~ & a a T a ? ~} j S I I ~ ? I S ~ ~ . ~ X l ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - - w < ? ~ 6 ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ k _ } ~ c i < X x X X ~ I x _~ I ~ ~ _~ c _~ c c _~ 2 3 _ F Z O y 9 ~ s ~ " I '~ ~ ~ `u m F ti ~ 3 3 3 5 3 ~ m & y 3 ~ a y 3 ~ .- ' ~ ~ :r 3 Y ~ '0 ~ '4 ~ y g .9 m .~ n C g ~ ?. G '~ 1G 3 C y ~ 3 Z 3 ? 3 a ~ 3 X ~ G :~ e e :L ~ U ~ S _ (' ~M1 ~ '~ ~9 i m .9 °~9 O ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ S ~ ~ 6 ~ SJ ~ N 3 ~ C a y 3 ~ T ~ p G Z c o K ~ C 3 ~ l ~ of ~ ~. ~ ~ ^ u 8 o°_ 2 k z ~ ~ .~ .~-. d u 2 cy g e a e a ~ al ~ ~ e o ~ v w~ ~ g ~ 3 2 5 a _ ~ L u p z ~ ~' @ ~ I~ 3 C q 9 ~ ~ 9 j ~ ~ 'y Q °~, o m ~' i s -° 'o m ~ 9 ~~ ~ i3 ~ ° u ~ p d ~ ~ ~ 3 Ji L ~ a ._. f a f .,. ~o-t~ I I ~~ ~ ~ I I ~ 2 i _ oo m i _ ~ ` ~ i i i I I m i ''. l .~ o Z! _ ~' I I T ~_ c I z y , ~ w ao ~ m i - I y0 I b I~ ~ :o I '-0 ~ a E :0 p Ot Ci y. rY ~I I I i ~ I i ~ { ~ I I V i v .~., I I ~ I _I i I ,^_, I, GL y ~ i =I ry ~ 3'I ~ ~ rv ~ I n ~ ~ I I I I i ~ I 1 .? l ~I `' ~ ~ I 6 ~ ,~ SHi 1 3 A 5 5 3 3 ~ ~ ~ I a I C I ~~ 5 '~ ~ m ~ ' '_ T ~ = {' E Q 'J ~ ~ c ~ y 9 2 3 ~ °~ 3 n I ~. 9 ~ ~ .~ n ~ ~ s ~ ~ I ~ r I T 'p u ~ I ~ 3 o I r t T al -~ ~ S m M a, ~ 'JUC ~' S ~ T ~ ~ I S T a0 ~ - V ~ " '~ 'S r >. J` T U ~, c ° ' ~ o _ m I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o m .~ .z ~ r J $ - ~ Y_ r ~ H ~~ ~~ _ ~ ~~ ~ I 3 3 I E ~ T ~ T ~ 7 ~ = ~ ~ .5 ~ I ~ I ~ S c J 3 ~ i 4 I yy? Y ~ I _ u i ~ ~ G i ~ _ ~ - I ~ e ~ .E ~ ° ~ r y ~ ~ y ' E ~ u E ~ .T ~ 7 a + c r ~ ; ~ 7 ^~ E - y E - y y 9 ~ Y' :. c. 7 ~ r ~ .~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ C] ~ I I + ~ y~~ J ~ 3~ .:.1 ~ 19 Y. y O .S ~ i 0-~ 2 ~' ~ i ~ I ~ j t~ I u I $ ~ _ s'~ I ~ I ~ r i I I ! i f ~ ~ = ~ I ' ~ ~ ~ I~ I' I~ I~ I I I < I i i t k ~ . I '~ I ; ~ I~ 3 i i z ~ 13 ~ I ~ I 2 i Y I ~ ~ I I ~ I i v/ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ yy I 's yy 3~ I y y _T 0 u 6 s ~~ 0 ~ x I ~ F V ~ I 9 i ~` 3 y a „ ~ P 0° 3 ~ ~ z~ z e ~ ~ i `' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ y u ° 3 ~ U z, U ~ Y - J y°. n ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ p, F O ~ o e ° ~ I ~ o s c " ~ ° ~ - ° ° Y O > UUU y O _3 ~ p Q '~ ? T 4 ~ 4 V ~ a S ~ x C 0 1 4 _ 1 '~ 5I s -yLy 3 ~ ~ 3 ~ LLL y M _e C 6 I _ W L '+ x~ (~'. ~ u~ ~ R I~ ~ !~ a~ g GG i ~-I y ~3 ~ ~ S 10.13 A a f ~~ 9 F 2 f 4 _ ' T ~~ ~ . _, _ a - ~ - il ~ ~ Ai V; I ~ ~ ~ X ~ ~I a i~ L I _ i X L y l I ~ ~ i~ ~ ~~' I u I v ~ I I~ I I i x X I i ~ ~ i ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i h a SI ~ ~ 3 5 ~ I~ I Q < 3 ~ _y ?~ I Si k y K .j.I a v k td C X C C C 13 ~ I b I -. I I ~ .~ ~ X k i i ~j ~ _o C m ac ~ io ~ ' 8 8 ~ ~C C 'C i °- '~ :S a :~ j 5 ~ ~ . : x" ~ :~ 8 _~ a .~ ~ ~ ' a a ~ c ~~ a ~ 1 2 ' ~ S ~;~ 'o ~ J 2 3 $ C ~ i~e T ~ z ~ `I - a ~ ~. .3i ~ l - I a ~~7 '~ ,,~ ~ ~ H 'a 2 ° 3 s m ~ 3a ~ I ~ f x ~ I ?~ ^] y C ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ n _ 3~ C ~ ~ ~ ° G• ~ 3s l L _ c s ~ _ y -~ -~: =~ F S ~ + '~ _ 7? I 4~ ~ 3 I C - m ~ C L ~ a 10-14 ,, ~~~ ~, ~, ~'\ \ -~ ~ ~,~ i ~ ~ r ~'~ ., ~ ~" ~ ~'~, -,~ -~\~\ , \ \A^ff ,~~ ~ ,, ~~ s ~ ~= ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~7 ;. ~ I \\ I~;Jy ' ,' l e~ ~X ,o o Y` 9 ~ j3 ~P ~j~ `~C ~a ~~ o ~ ~ \ ~ y ~ i %p ~ O .'O V 4 ~ DA Z~ ~ G y i \ G ~ r ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ r. y i xi Jac ?C : 't _ f \ A ~ i'F T ,~ JA \~ \5 o~i MGNFExS - COYL~fE~TS :~.\'D RESPOtiSES TO TIIE PttELL~iL~ARY DRaFi' CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD ~~~Q~ Sa~me:m.:~Wa~iy 95L'6 tiovember 5, 1951 William J. Alexander Mayor Pro Tem The City o£ Rancho Cucamo;~ga P.o, sox ao7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91710 s~3JEC1': Preliminary Draft Source Reduction and Recycling Element for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Cear Mayor Alexander: The California Zntegrat ed Waste Management Board ;Hoard) staff have reviewed the Preliminary OraEt Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Waste Generation Study (WGS) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga for compliance with Chapter 9, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Planning Guidelines and Procedures Eor Preparing and Revising Countywide Integrated Waste Hanageaent Plans (Guidelines). Attached to this letter are specific comments staff had on the SRRE and WGS. in the development oP the SRRE, please remember that the SRRE should provide for flexibility. ey including contingency plans a rd alternatives in the SRRE, a jurisdiction will be prepared for any unforeseen problems that may occur as this process moves from the planning stage to the implementation stage. The comments in the attachment, and all other comments received by the City of Aancho Cucamonga must be addressed in the final SRRE. It you have any questions, please contact ma at (916) 255- 2719 or Tani Galloway of the Division's Local Assistance South Section at (916) 255-L709. Sincerely, ~~33 ~~ccGLc~~ 1~Uz~~/,-u`~ '.7chn D. Smith, supervisor ~~ Local Assistance Branch Planning and Assistance pivision Attachment cc: San Bernardino County Local Task Force SCS Engineers Rlnml a ~axlol hpr - city of Rancho Cucamonga S RRE comments Page 2 Attachment COMN.ENTS CM THB 80LZD WABTB uENERATiON BTDDY (W08) Page 2-{, Bsetioa Z Household hazardous waste is listed as one of the materials targeted for diversion. This waste cannot be counted toward diversion goals because it is not permitted to be disposed of at solid waste landfills, pursuant to CCR section 18722(m). Cot4lERT8 ON AB 939 BoLID WASTE OENERAT%OH BTODZES (separate volume) - Paq• 1-1, Section 1 -' It is stated (for the purposes of this study) tY,at "commercial wastes are defined as wastes generated by retail stores, businesses, and to some extent multi-family residential units". All wastes generated from multifamily residential ur.i is should be classified ae "Residential" and not Commercial, pursuant to CCR section 18720(a)(59). Pegs 2-5 It is stated that SCS Eng ineere conducted a single-season field sampling program. Considering the discussion of the regions seasonal variation, should this one-season field sampling be considered a reprasentativs characterization of solid wastes generated, 3lvarted and disposed for the City of Rancho Cucamonga? Please address this in the final solid waste generation study, ae required by CCR section 18722(i)(2)(c). Pegs 2-28, Table Z-1• The "non-paper organics" waste category should ba changed to "other organ ice" pursuant to CCR section 18722(j). Please make this change in thi• table and other aimilaz tables of the solid waste generation study. Tha total tons under the "residential" column should have been 6],190 and not 65,880 tons. Pleas® review your c'lct`~tions in this table and other simliu;. tables of the solid waste generation study for eccuracy. A1CO, please explain why data from "other" source of generation was not included in this table, ae required by CCR section 18722(1). Paq• 30-2, eeotioa 7 It is stated that conversions from volume to weight were made using standard conversion formulae from generally acceptable sources. Pleae• cite the references used (s.g., author, title, date, publisher and place of publication), as required by CCR section 18722 (f)(1}. City cf Rancho Cucamonga SRRE Comments Page 3 o Pleases identify all solid waste diversion facilities and all permi±ted solid waste transformation and disposal facilities used by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as required by CCR section 12722 (i). o As a reminder, for solid wastes sampled or estiaated to be received at solid waste transformation facilities and solid waste disposal sites, the total aggregate quantity of solid wastes disposed shall be reported in both volume and weight. For solid wastes disposed in permitted solid waste landfills, the volume measurement shall be expressed in terms of in-place volume in the landfill, as specified in CCR section 18722(f)(4). COtL*fENTB O8 BOQRCS REDOCTION COMPONENT Paq 2-Z A list of quantities of materials currently diverted and a list of quantities of materials currently disposed is required by CCR section 1H772ja). Page 2-2 indicated that this information could ba found on Table 2-1, but Tablfl 2-1 could not be located in the report. Please add the missing information in the final SRRE. CO?4SENT8 OM T88 RECYCLING COMPONENT Paq• 4-35 Ones of the recycling programs selected was a mechanized material recovery tacility (MRF). The City anticipates working cooperatively with nearby jurisdictions to design and implement this facility and anticipates this facility will not be operational until the medium-term planning period. As required by CCR section 18777.5(b),(c) and (d), please provide identification of the tasks necessary for implementation, shcrt- term and medium-tern implementation schedules addrasaing each task, and identification of known costs, revenues and revenue sources necessary for implementation of this facility. Paq• ~-39, Contingflamp xuauru --~ it is stated the overall marketing strategy for the operator of a !RF will 6o to sell most collected materials through brokers, but -z should the market change, than other brokers will be sought. Please describe in greater detail the methods that will be used to seek new brokers. -~ Pegs I-~l _ It is stated that if a targeted material or procedure does not contribute significantly to diversion goes is than that activity - would be discontin~; ed. It is important to remember that even - though a particula activity does not contribute to the mandated diversion goals, tce activity may still ba worthwhile and may .,.E City of Rancho Cucaaonga SR.RE Comments Pays a contribute to the overall intent of AS 979, which is to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generated to the maximum extent feasible. --. Pag• 4-ta lc is stated that the City may consider "flow control measures" to ensure that all appropriate materials era received at the MRF. Please describe in the final SRRE how the City will control the recyclable waste stream. CoHlSENTB OB THE COHPOBTIH6 COMPOHEHT Pag• 5-Zl _.. Or,e cptior. identified for using composted materials was the use of the material as a landfill cover. Please ba advised that the landfill operator moat obtain approval from the Board and the Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) prior to using any material other than soil as landfill cover. Tha City oP Rancho Cucamonga will need to identify other contingency measures in the event the current alternatives selected are not capable of meeting the mandatory diversion goals. The following information concerning alternative landfill covers may also be of interest to You: The use of compost as landfill cover is not permitted for widespread application by the Hoard. For compost to be deemed as a suitable alternative cover, the landfill operator must submit a proposal request to the Hoard and to the LEA for consideration. If the Hoard approves Cha request, the operator must establish a demonstration project, which would normally last at least ane year. At the and of that demonstration project period, the Board and the LEA would evaluate the suitability of the damonetrat ion cover material. If the Board and the LEA approve the material as "alternative cover", the operator would then Lilc an Amended Report of Disposal SSte Information and an application to revise the Board issued permit. After the permit is revised, the proposed material could ba used as cover. Current statute and regulation interpretation indicates that a aaterial recovered from the waste stream, which is processed and returned to a use with economic value, constitutes a diversion activity that may count toward the goals of AB 939. Through. this interpretation, the use of a material derived from the waste scream as an approved alternative cover material may count ae a diversion ectivity. . Page S-2t one contingency measure identified is the feasibility of City of Rancho Cucamonga SRRE comments Page 5 ccmposting municipal solid wastes. Please remember that inezts and other non-organic material used in the composting will not count toward the diversion mandates. Therefore it is important to plan for other contingency uses to meet the mandated diversion goals. It is also passible that a mixed municipal solid waste compost material may have a lower marketability due to the quality cf the product. Aa a result, it may be more difficult to obtain markets or brokers for the product. Page 5-15 ._, Zt is estimated that the short-term diversion goal for composting programs will be 3.St. This short-term goal is to be met by January 1, 1995. please explain how this goal -will be met when Tables 5-5 and 5-6 indicates that the Residential Yard Waste Colieotion Program and the Facility Implementation Program with Crop Off will begin operation in June 1995. COt4lEETE OH TEE EDDCATIOa 71ND POBLIC Z`JDORMATZOa COlLPONEa Page 7-7 ~V~ It is stated that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be responsible for the monitoring and evaluation of all education and public information programs. A8 required by CCR section 1a740(e)(3), please be mots specif is and identify an agency, a division or personnel of a division who wi12 be responsible for monitoring and evaluation. COM?SENTS Ox TEE DZBPOBAL 711CILITY C71Y71CZTY CONPONEET Paq• 8-3 -~. It is stated that "no additional facility disposal capacity is needed by the City since all residual wastes that are not diverted from the landfills will be exported ." and "this does not imply that the City will not need landfill space for the disposal of wastes, but only that additional capacity will not be needed." Please be advised that if the City does not have an export agreement with another jurisdiction for the additional capacity needed, then in tact, tho City will need additional disposal capacity, which is correctly shown on Table 8-1. coaQ~x2e ox Tea ~vanfao cowPOxEtrr Paq• 9-S .. In order to show cuff icient flexibility to allow [or unexpected developments, more detail is needed in the area of contingency funding, such as what projected amounts may ba obtained from various contingent funding sources, such as the issuance oP debt instruments and municipal bonds. City of Rancho Cucamonga SRRE comments Page 6 Paq• 4-6, Tabl• f-1 CCR section 18746(b) zequirea cost estimates to be provided for component programs scheduled for implementation ir. the short-term planning period. Please change tT.e terminology of Years 1, 2, ], 4, and 5 to 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1995 in the final SRRE. _„ Page 9-6, Tabl• 9-1 The Source Reduction program costs fluctuate bet.teen $21,000 to $12,000 to $105,000. Please explain vhy these costs fluctuate from year to year. In addition, please explain the cost increase for the Composting program, when the costs increase from $59,000 to $1.5 million in Year 5. COMMENTB ON T88 YNTEGRIITZOH COMPOBIENT -~~ The Master Implementation Schedule should include a description of the Material Recovery Facility program, and identity the responsible entity, implementation dates, milestone dates and funding source of this program, as required by CCR section 18748(b). RESPONSE TO CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD COMMENTS ON DRAFT SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT So_id :ia ste Generation S 1. Page 2-4, Section 2 Sou sehoLd ha2ardous ~daste has been recoved from the list of ^_argeted materials. Solid waste 9e r.e ration Studi25 (SegdCate YO luIDel 2. Page 1-1, Section 1 The necessary corrections have hee r. made in the final SRRE. 3. Page ]-5 .vdditional discussion has been added to explain why the field sampling is ronsldered a representative characterization of solid ~.Jastes generated, diverted and disposed for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~. Paga 2-28, Ta61e 2-18 The Non-Paper organics waste category contains the waste types specified in Section Ia722 (j). It is simply a slightly different title. The title has been used consistently throughout to SWGS and the SRRE and changing it at time is unnecessary and could cause confusion. The Total in Table 2-25 is the correct amount for the waste disposed. The amounts shown far each waste type are percentages of the Total and do not add exactly to the Total because of rounding. Additional information on composting of other waste has beer. added to the final SWGS and SRRE. 5. Page 3-2, Section 3 The conversion factors used were from the National Recycling coalition Measurement Standards and Reporting Guidelines, published October 71, 7989. This citation has been added to the final SRRE. 6. General SWGB Comment All solid waste diversion facilities and permitted solid waste Cransformation and disposal facilities are identified in the SRRE. 7. General SWGS comment Volumes are sho•dn in Chapter S of the final SRRE, Source Reduction Component (Ihe comment relates to the SWGS, not the Source Reduction Component) 8. Pags 2-2. The missing Cable has reen added to the final SRRE. [?ecYCl.ng Co ^.P Onent 9. Page {-35 Additional tables have been i^cluded in the final SRRE that provide the required inforcattcn on MRF .-.p leme r.tation. 10, Page {-39 Add it~enai continyency -~easures iia ve hee r, included in the final SRRE. 11. Page {-{1 The Statement about discontinuing a targeted material or procedure was incorrect and has been changed ir. the final SRRE. 12. Page {-{4 This discussion was meant to refer to controlling scavenging activity, r.ot .'low control. .A correction has been made in the fir.ai SRR F. composting component 13. Pag6 5-21 The City appreciates the information on landfill cover regulations and .rill take the information into account in implementing composting programs. 1{. Paga 5-2{ The City will take these comments into account if MSW co- r_ompostinq programs are planned. 15. Paga 5-25 The dates for the implementation of composting programs have been corrected in Table 5-5 and 5-6. Education and Public Information Component 16. Page 7-'! As ir,d icated in Table 7-1, the City Integrated Waste coordinator will he responsible for monitoring and evaluation. Disposal Facility Ca gacity Component 17. Paq~ 8-3 Changes have been made in the final SRRE to reflect the need for additional disposal capacity. eundinc component 18. page 9-5 The con[inyency funding listed provides a significant range of possible funding sources if needed. It i5 not useful to speculate how much wculd be raised by each source when there is no way of know inq how much or when add it final funds might be needed. Page 9-6, Tables 9-1 and 9-2 These changes have been rage .r. the `anal SRRE. 20. page 9-6, TaEle 9-1 Explanations for progra~ costs have been added to these tables in the :final SRRE. integration Ccroone nt 21. Page 10-7 The lr.p lementation schedule for the regional material recovery facility has been added to the Master Impleme nta[ion Schedule. CITY CF RANCHO CCAMONGA SRRE 6 HNWE CCDDfENTS FRCM COMPOSTING, SiCDGE, SEPTIC, S HHW COIRQITTEE SAN BERNARDINO COCNTY SOLID WASTE ADVISORY TASK-FORCE • OCTOBER 1991 CVERAI:. CCFiMENTS `• -• :..*.e California Integrated Waste Management Board's checklists for the Waste Generation Study, Source Reduction and Recycling Element, and Household Hazardous Waste Element should be attached, with page numbers noeed next to each item. -~ 2, Although the checklists are r.ot attached, it does appear that the sections this Committee reviewed do meet regulation requirements. The interrelationship bntwaen backyard composting and composting programs should be addrasaad. These programs should be coordi r.a ted. For example, composting programs should be set up so that backyard. composting is still encouraged. COMMENTS, OTHER SECTIONS „• 1. Solid Waat~ ~~~~-~~~ a i.-:- ---- - - The understand inq of Chino s plan would be greatly enhanced i! the city added population fiquraa and projections to this section. Population figures are only included in the joint West Valley Solid waste Generation Studies document. .,, 2. Intearat'on Component Paoe 10 16 Table 10 6. This table or another should indicate when yard waste collnction goes citywide and when the composting facility will be operational. COMPOSTZNG COMPONENT COMMENTS g• 1. paae_5-14. Hazards rea ed 6v he al of NOX and C02 ahou ld be listed as E ;, 2. pace ~-15, consi•tenev with local oc Qunlity Management District rules emissions may need to be addressed attainment district, and windrow emissions may hove to be mitigated. :ernative. Air emissions otenC ial hazards. licise. South Coast Air regarding NOX and C02 since SCAQMD is a non- eompoetinq-related air CITY OF RANCHO C:.'CAMO:lGA SRRE S HHWE COMMENTS CCMPOSTI".IG, SLtiCGE, 5E-rTIC, tiND HHW CCMMITTE£ PAGE 'WC 2aae 5-25. Table 5-1. In the short term over 2000 tone of areen •daste is expected to be diverted for composting at a drep-eff center. 3ut •.:hat drop-off tenter? The city did not pltk that as a selected program. (See page 5-20.) 's there some already funcu cuing drop-off center that ~.+as not menticned :n the "Existing Conditions" section (pace 5-0)? To fort..".er confuse the issue, Tables S-4 (page 5-26) and>-6 (page 5-30) list some drop-oft facility. However, even this facility could not account for diversion in the short term since it will not be operational until January, 1996. Please clear this all up. Paae 5-27, Table 5-7. Are the costs shown here Rancho Cucamonga's share alone? 1~ SPECIAL WASTE WMPONENT COMMENTS §~. It is not clear what Rancho Cucamonga will actually do to ohtain mare diversion of Large items and tires beyond more accurats reporting. Whet is really meant by "market development" is unclear. 1;, 2. There should b• some discussion of medical waste, to be consistent with plans from other San Bernardino County cities. HOL'S EHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT COMMENTS Paae 1. It should ba noted that the rnqulations for AB 979 required the counting of empty containers, which ar• not legally houaehold hazardoua waste. TRe amount of actual household hazardoua waste mey be lower than the amount found in the Solid Weet• Generation Study, Paaee i2-11. Eftactiveness of the oraaram. The end of this section srould be changed to read, "IC is •atimated by the County of San Bernardino that tM permanent collection sills in the County are collecting HHW from 7 to 4 percent of the households annually." There should also be an explanation that it is not possible to estimate the percentage of total HHW generated that is collected because of atoekpilinq and residents not conaidaring items FQIW if they are still usable. It is also not known what percentage of households generate HHW or the average storage time. /MG RESPONSE TO THE COMPOSTING, SLUDGE, SEPTIC, AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COMMITTEE of THE SAN RERNARDINO COUNTY SOLID WASTE ADVISORY TASH-FORCE, OCTOBER 1991 G!'e rail Conners`- . 'he check_tsts are used by C_.:`c rnca :nteerated Waste %ana?er.e nt gcard staff and o.e ,,., ,. r.=_eded as an attacheent. Z. The C. acprec.ates t:.a roa-ent by the Task-force. =• The State Requ latxcr.s require that backyard composting be included in the Source reduction Comppnent, which Hakes it appear that backyard composting and yard waste composting progra ms are less interrelated than they ~.:i11 be in practice. The City agrees that these programs should be coordinated, The Source reduction Component includes technical assistance and public education efforts to encourage 6ackyacd composting throughout the planning period even after •/a rd '.aste collection has begun. Cther Sections ~. Page 2-3 Population figures have been included in the final SRRE. 5. Page 10-16, Table 30-6 Dates for composting implementation have been added to the final SRRE. COmDOetln^ CC^pOrR nt 6. Page 5-1~ Inf or~aticn cn potential air en iss ions has been added to the final SRRE. 7. Page 5-15 Information on SCAQMD regulations has been added to the final SRRE. e. Page 5-25, Tabls 5-1 The implementation schedule far composting programs has been corrected in the final SRRE. 9. Paga 5-27, Tabl• 5-1 A footnote has been added to indicate that the costs are the overall costs far a regional factli[y. 10. Paga 6-10 and 6-11 The Monitoring and Evaluation section indicates that the City and the waste haulers dill be keeping records on the diversion of white goods and bulky items. The collection of white goods and bulky items has been handled separately for several years, which is why a new peogram was not described in [he SRRE. 11. Discussion of Medical Waste Yon-infectious hospital .:3 ste is inciuded 'with insCitutional 'waste. InsCitutional/office recycling programs are included in the Recycling Conponent. >iajor medical facilities and Che waste generated will be identified as part of the Waste Evaluation/Waste Minimization Program, also included in the Recycling Conponent. PANCHO CUCAMCNGA SRRE - '^ary E'.ien ^drris, ~u0',~„ ,rfJr°attCn 3 EduCdticn SupcC^mit'ee )AT_. ;e7:. ?J, 991 EYEC7T16'E SUMMARY '~e execu:tse summary ,rC+cates :hat Rancho Cucamonga needs an ^ ess ere -rag^a.m :o ,ncrease liver st on from the current 8, to the 25t anC ;C% gcats. However, tna summary only describes the same general acttvtt,es ai try d~'• Jf t^°_ atho. SnnE~ prepdrev' py aCG. ;t i$ iiVf dC dii :;;ear wn 1Cn genera tCr is re sponstble for most of Me waste antl wnioh generator 15, taus. large *.ed `ar -+ost efforts. This summary reouires much mere detatl--Ue -eater 5^cu1C be able to get a Blear anC concise picture of the entire SRRE SEC"iCN 7--PU8L IL INFORMATION AND EDUCATION Goals and 06jectives--Oo these goats and objectives for awareness match the pt armed activities elsewhere in the SRRE? In other words, if more :h an 50X of restCen is are to be included in recycling programs py 1995, then reacn+ng 50t would not 6e adebua te. Existing Conditions--Be more specific. Who in the Engineering Deaart- nent is respansiple for developing and distributing information? How much staff time is involved? how many brochures have been produced? What is the ^dme of !ne City's newsletter? Whdt ii its Circulatf On? HOw mdny ar tlCleS Jn reCytling /501id waste i5SUe5 nave been in this newsletter? What schools are Conducting recycling programs--list them. What grade 'evels are affected? Put some example materials in the aDPendix. Program Selection--Be more specific. How many residences will De reached by the year 1995? By 2000? What types of commercial/industrial generators will Oe reached? List generators by types. Which tnstitu Lions? List them, Why were these generators Selected--explain briefly here, This section is very poor. Program Alternatives--Descripe more about the IntegrateO Waste Coordi- nator. is this to be a new City Dositian? What Qualifications will be r°-CU~red? Put all of the jab resDansibilities hers. I5 waste auditing a re4ponstptlity° What is Lne relationship between LhiS DDS1t100 and the Recycling Coordinator position shown in Table 7-t? Monitoring and Evaluation--include sample survey /arms. There is too much reliance on volunteers for distribution of information and followuD. Suggest another full or part-time staff position, Table 7-i--Explain all cost estimates in detail, with breakdowns. RESPONSE TO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COUNTY TASH-FORCES SEPTEMBER 30~ 1991 In general all of the convents are asking for lore detail than is appropriate for the level of planning anticipated in an SRRE. However, where passible Wore specifics have been added to the final SRRE. C I T Y O F ONTARIO ~+.~iia`r :~o n~~elKi1 Ntu 'NI a !ON V2W ~Y[4Ui OYtMiQ Gr LiCn M:A n~1!~+IOE v~rian•oaor OCLDDar 0, /991 :ot Rarold Cutly, 9ourc• R•duet-ion and A•oyolinq Gommlttaa rroao Bark 3ozanun, A•eyellnq Coosdlnater, Clty or ontaria S.~;ac:i CS~y of Ranehe Cuaaaonga pr•11•inary d=aft SRRE-- Racycllnq Coam•nta 1 ~ Thy 20a axutlnq induaTari•1 divaraion ia, a 1ndlNtad, vary`li7h (psq• t~l~. !•shap• more ~1aDOritide OII thin point could b• appreprlat•. + Th• eoas• for tA• !GV on page HZa Nq lOw. 3 Tabl• :-:0 IfU,DDO eo 6latrinub n!na7 Nowl /oaFll`CnIPO~Y inn+minF n!oTO 10M rrrw~• ~ i• ~/J~ O IfY I' - / Tom- r ,~, ,E M~ RESPONSE TO COM.N ENTS FROM THE CITY of ONTARIO 1. Page 4-3 Alc,cst a> percent of the Indust nal ; i:ei s:on is scrap steel. A s.ngle industry recyc:ink t,~•a very nervy product can easily ra a e the ir.d us :: tal dare rs:on rate o~:er the r.o ra.. 2. Paqe 2-28 Ihes=_ are costs for a sn.all r-tech facility. Certainly, a _arge faczizty rould cost considerably Wore, as is indicated in the discussicr, of a -echanized ~'R F. 3. Page 4-10 :here fiqu res_ c:•d de anneal operas ir,g costs ir, addition to container disir:bution. The notatior, has been clarified in the :zeal SRRE. ~7i 'ASR F.1CS :=`.L`S::'~: ~-. _ .*evisa ay •^o City c: ._..:a'a .or ~..- Cities of .,7A7 7ERd.-..,., =...:fC, Zn.~': ... .:CA:!:KGA, ~JYA .::77d, 1'LYa:?A ^.:^^.:^ ^VJA Socr.a Reduction dafici~ncies: - ar:BneS:eao,^, 00569 Cot •/~11 d~linad. Recyciirg overall is good. Cc~s not idMtify eh• Sendlill ^'•r-ently Laino used, Cannot d~earsin• i! tY.~re i• e.^. lmpaet to Fortane of r,ot. - flundlrp ca 6h• racycl inq eoapon~nt not v~ll dslin~d. .~~:~ ~~~~ cap s~~+ R. , .,?_ . ?ev::a 'oy t.`.e cl;y ct Fontana for ::e Cities of .,PA:; .. :E?A.=._:, ... _:;~i R1.~':... ..CA:!'.CG~. ~JNA .::7:~. I:'C?.:?A ia.~~:Y~.:S `5.:+"y~A sour7e ReCuction C•f:cienelea: - :a;lemen:a:ioa co^,'; not cell de[ined. Recycilnq overall _x good. Do•e not identity the lend!!11 ^~a:rentiy Eeinq a»C, cannot d•eotain• it there ie an !mpect to Fontana or rat. - F~~nd1r.0 :n the recycling coaponent not yell detlned. ^.. ~' ~ ~~~~FY'~ RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM THE CITY OF FONTANA The SRRE states that M.ill:rien ~a ndfill is the disposal site far 'paste yenecated in Rancho Cuca-.o nga. the other convents are verb general and therefore difficult to respond to. SCS ENGINfEXS - FINAL REPORT AB 939 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEbff.NT i'ILE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pn~arod for: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is Conjunction with the West San Bernardino County Coalition Prepared by: SCS Faginxn 3711 Long Hcach Boulevard, Niot6 Floor Long Beach, California 9080'7 (310) 4269544 December 1991 File No. 190191 ~x. S6 FNGINEEYS - covrFrrrs Paee Executive Summary ............................... .......... ES-I Introduction .................................... ............ t Objectives ..................................... ............2 Existing Conditions ............................... ............ 2 Ikscription of CoBxtion Alternatives ..................... ........... 5 Description of Monitoring Alternative ..................... ........... 6 Description of Recycling Al[eroative ..................... ........... 7 Description of Public Fducation/Infortnation Alternative ......... ........... 7 Evaluation of Collection Alternatives .................... ............ g Evaluation of Recycling Alternative ..................... ............ I7 Evaluation of Public EducatiotrlInformation Alternative ......... ............ l9 Program Selection ................................ ............21 Program Implementation ............................ ............ 21 Monitoring and Evaluation ........................... ............ 25 Education and Public Information ...................... ............ 26 Funding ...................................... ............27 Appendix A -Household Hazardous Waste Agreement Appendix B -Comments and Responses to the Preliminary Draft SCS FNGiNFEMS - TABLES \umber Paee Estimated Participation and Waste Types Collected, 1989-1990. Rancho Cucamonga Household Hazardous Waste Collection Canter ................................. ?9 2 Waste Quantities and Types at Collection Event, Rancho Cucamonga. California, April 14, 1990 ................... JO SCS ENWNfERS - EXECUTIVE SL:N:~fARY Lr TRODUCTIOY The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Dm3 Houxhold Hazardous Waste (EII~R~ Elemen[ a~as developed to meet the requirements of the California Integrated Solid Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), AB 1820, and subsequent related legislation and implementation guide- lines for the preparation of SRR Elements issued by the California Integrated Waste :Management Board (CIWMB). As stipulated in AB 1820, i[ is a xlf-standing document which has been bound with the SRR Element for ease of evaluation and distr'bution. The HHW Element was developed as part of a coalition of five jurisdictions made up of the western unincorporated area of the County of San Bernazdino, and the cities of Uphmd, Chino, Rancho Cucamonga, and Montclair. Thex jurisdictions joinW together to enhance the possibilities for regional cooperation and to share one waste characterization study. A separate HHW Element has been pteparod for each arra with spx~c input from appropriate local staff and franchised haulers responsible for waste collection. The amount of HHW actually detected is the Solid Waste Ceoeratfon Study performed for the City was estimated to be less than 1 percent of the waste stream. In accordance with the legislation, the HHW Element pmposea a xries of programs to reduce the amount of HHW which is disposed of in Ltndfdls aed develop recycling markW or end-uxs for HHW products such as paint and motor oil. • Increasing the hours of operation of the permanent HHW drop-off facility, located in Rancho Cucamonga, is under considetadoo by the City. .c ES-t SCS ENG~NEFPS • Rancho Cucamonga will continue to participate in the San Bernardino Countv Household Hazardous Waste Management )'rogtam. This progtam includes eight permanent collection centers located [hroughout the County, and an ongoing public education program. • The City of Rancho Cucamonga will continue to cooperate with the County, which cosponsoted 16 one-day collection events throughout the County of San Bernatdino last year. FS-2 SCS ENGINEERS - CITY OF RA.~CHO CUCA.IIONGA HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELE,~YT L\'1RODCCTION The information contained within this document, and its general formaz, is intended to com- ply with [he requirements of Title l4, Chapter 9, Division 7, Articles 6.3 and 7 and species the means by which the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall collect, rxycle, treat, and dispose of household harardous waste (HHVI~ generated within [his jurisdiction. An HHW generarion rate of 7.5 pounds per year per household and an estimate of 36,000 households in the City would indicate that approximately I35 tons per year of HHW is cur- rently being generated by residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The amount of HHW actually detected in the Solid Wasle'Generation Study performed for the City was estunated to be less than 1 perceet of the waste stream, and included HHW containers which are not legally HHW. The amount of actual harardous material is therefore lower. AB 939 regulations require that cities consider four types of HHW program alternatives, all of which will be evaluated ie this element. They are collation, monimring, recycling, and public educadon/informatloe. iC5 ENGINfFNS - OW ~+CTtVI'S The objectives of the I~IW Element for the City ace as follows: • Reduce. by 25 percent in the short term and 50 percent in the medium term, the amount of HHW generated within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which is cur- rently disposed in landfills. • In the short- and medium-term planning periods, increase the level of participa- tion coexisting programs (EDiW collection centers and periodic one-day round- ups). • In the short- and medium-tetra planning periods, develop markets or end-uses for rxycled HHW products such as paint and motor oil. • in the short- and medium-term plazming periods, inerrase public awareness of hazardous materials, encourage the use of equivalrnt, less toxic products, and emphasize proper disposal methods through comprehensive educational programs. • Improve and expand safety procedures employed az the HHW collection centers and roundups. Develop an automated system for tracking wastes received and they disposition. EXLSTP, iG CONDITIONS Rancho Cucamonga is currently a participant in the San 0ernardino County Household Haz- ardous Waste Management Program. It is the City's intention to continue to participate and. where applicable, to expand upon and modify that program to mat requirements specific to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A copy of an appropriate household hazadous waste SCS ENGINEERS - agreement between a county and city will be Found in Appendix A. The County program includes: • Eight permanent year-round collection centers throughout the County. • One-day publicity and collection "events" to pubtlcize and encourege the use of existing centers. • An ongoing public education and infotmarion effort to increase pubGe awareness of HHW issues, and to provide educational materials to schools and interested groups. Permaeeot DroprofT Facility- A permanent drop-off facility is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the Foothill Fire Protection District Fite Station No.3 (12158 Baseline Road). The facility is manned by Fire Department petsotteel who have ban trained in hazardous waste handling and emergen- cy response procedures. This facility hu bcen operatiottal since August 1987 and is open to the public every Saturday berwern the bouts of 10:00 a. m, and 2:00 p. m. The continued operation of this facility at its present location, and the questioe of personnel, ate now being examined. The San Bemardieo County Department of Eaviroumental Health Services (DF1iS) provides safety equipment and supphea, personnel [raining, and oversight. The co-spoesoring agency (in this case the Fue Department) provides the location and personnel. DENS obtains aLL necessary permits and manages rho waste once it is collected. Waztes that were collected during fiscal year 1990 ate summarized in Table 1. 3 c Onrnay Collectiott5-- SCS ENGINEERS In addition ro the permanent collection center, San BemaMino County DENS cosponwrs one-day collection events with agencies of various Iocal jurisdictions. During fixal year l99Q. DEHS assisted with l6 one-day events. one of which was N Rancho Cucamonga. Table 2 provides the quantities and waste types collected a[ this event. Disposal- Materials collected at the permanent facility and one-day collection events ate brought [o a facility in [he City of San Bemanlino which functions as a central processing facility for the countywide program. Paint, antffreeze, gasoline and automotive batteries are consolidated with similar material from other facilities and recycle!. Full lab packs are also brought ro the San Bernardino facility for shipment to a treatment or disposal facility. This facility is operated by San Bemardino County DEHS. The Solid Waste Getteratioa Smdy and }t}iN disposal analysis indicate that about l35 tons of FiEIW ate grnented annually in Rancho Cucamonga. With the exception of the HHW collected rbtottgh vendor wllectlon, curbside collection of motor oil and at drop-off centers, it must !reassumed that the test of this material is being illegally disposed with solid waste or pourM into sewers. Accurate records of proper disposal in the past ate not available, but it has probably not exceeded f0 tans per year, leaving about 125 tons per year IDegally disposed. Public Education and Outteach- The County ties an extensive public information and educadon program, emptusizing the safe disposal of I~IW through the use of drop-off centers, as weU as the use of nontoxic alter- natives, The County publicizes in collection program through media campaigns that include: • Articles and public notices in local papers, • Radio and television announcements. ^F SCS FNG~NEERS - • Distribution of posters, stickers, and flyers, • Direct mail announcements. • Brochures, booklets, slide shows. videos, and teaching packets for ux by schools and community or service groups. :111 materials are prepared N both English and Spanish. '[fie City independently publicizes its collection center. DESCRIPEION OF COLLECTION ALTERNATIVES AB 939 regulations requite that tides consider four types of HFIW program alternatives: • Collection. • Monitoring. • Recycling. • Public education information. One means to [educe the volume of IiEiW in the municipal solid waste stream is to provide curbside collection on a regular or occasional basis. This type of program would be best suited to single-family dwellings. It tequues the ux of specialized collection vehicles and the implemeotatioe of a public education program to instruct residents on haw to handle hazardous roate[ials. Collection xrvice could be provided by the City's fraachixd haulers. This alternative would require the availability of a permitted facility for the temporary stor- age of hazardous materials prior to their transport to recycling, treatment, or disposal facilities. S One-Dav Collection Events SCS ENGINEERS - Cnder this alternative, City agencies, fire districts, or community groups would collect FDIW in specially designed portable treatmenUcollection units at various locations (e. g., foe sta~ [ions, City facilities, or privately owned industrial sites) semiannually, or quarterly, As a rule, collection facilities are specially designed s[orage units mounted on a semi[mck trailer or a prepared concrete slab. The unit is staffed by trained personnel who screen, sort, and lab-pack wastes. to considering this alternative, it is assumed that the City's franchised haulers would provide collection, recycling, and disposal services. The City would be responsible for project management, publicity, and promotion. Permanent CoOectioo Sites To implement this alternative, the City would need m site a perntitted permanent collection center at one or mote locations. A pubhe education outreach program would be necessary to inform residents of the days and hours that collection centers would be open to accept waste and procedures to be followed when bringing HIiW to the site. A permanent site is gener- ally equipped with a building deaigrted to Stott and separate incompatible HHW. The facility must be provided with all proper safety and foe protxtion equipment and staffed doting operating hours by one or more workers fully certified to handle hazardous materials. The City could own and operate a permanent drop-off site, although it may be possible to solicit private involvement in either ownership or operation of this type of facility. DESCRIPTION OF MONITORING ALTERNATIVE Milliken IaedfW Load Checlt Prvenm [n accorxlance with the requiremeets of the County's Solid Waste Facility Permit to operate Milliken landfill, the Operator (Notcap is requited to randomly check loads of solid waste delivered daily to the site. This load check program is the final step in a program ro divert EIIiW from the landfill. Because this program will continue as long as the landfill is oper- 56 ENGINEFPS - ated and because it is required vrespective of AB 939 or other legislative mandates for an HHW Flement, an evaluation of this altemative is not presented in this document It should be noted that the load check program at the landfill monitors the success of diversion and source reduction effotts, but i[ is not an alternative disposal option. DESCRIPTTON OF RECYCLING ALTER.YATIVE Gas stations, automotive centers, and automobile parts stores may serve as locations to dropoff and temporarily store motor oil, antifreeze, and batteries. Similazly, paint and paint products could he accepted at stores which sell these produMS. Implementation of this alternative would require that personnel be trained to determine whether incoming materials are acceptable for collection at these businesses. This altemative could be enacted either through a voluntary approach or an ortlinance. Under the voluntary method, the Ciry would assist in publicizing rotations accepting these forms of FDiW and would wont with businesses to encourage residents to deliver IIIIW. If a regulatory approach is utilized, the City would enact an otdirtance which requires busi- nesses selling these products to provide a collection service for used products. The selected programs target HHW for which stably markets cost This is especially tme for waste oil, batteries, paint (oil and latex-based), and solvents. Paint recycling oppomEni- ties could include the donation of paint to local organizations, the establishment of a pain[ exchange located at the permanent HHW doop-aff facility, or the use of paint by the Muni- cipal Services Depamnrnt for applications which do not requue a high-grade product. DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC EDUCATION/INFORMATION ALTERNATIVE Two types of pubhe information programs may be implemented to reduce the presence of HFiW in the waste stream: • A variety of media providing general information to educate residents about the SCS ENGINEE45 - hazardous materials they may use io their homes, safe substimces, and proper disposal methods. • Stela which instruct residents and businesses how to prepare materials for the selected collection program. Both types of programs should be viewed as eentinuous: one-shot educational efforts cannot be expected to yield substantive results. EVALI:ATT0:1 OF COLLECTTON ALTT:RYATIVFS Periodic Curbside CoLection Evaluation of periodic curbside collect!on includes the following criteria: • Effective ca of hr nrvergm„ programs of this natuze have eot been imple- mented Nmany cities. Accordingly, data which quantify effectiveness ate not available Participation rates should be higher for curbside programs than for other altemadves because the collection is done at the site of generation, requir- ing less effort for tridents. • Hararda anu+rianvi wj h he prp~m, There ace several potential hazards related to this type of program. Accidental spills that require special cleanup are possi- ble, If left overnight at the cuff (az nears with the curbside collection of municipal solid waste) there ate potential hazards to persons who might come m contact with I~IW. The danger to children is of particular concern. Properly trained collectors can minimize other risks associated with handling and transpon- ing Ii}iW after it is collected. Depending on the frequency of collection, the operation of collection vehicles would result in incremental increases in traffic, au emissions, and fuel coosumptioo. 8 .c r 56 ENGMEFPS - • Ability to accommodate change. Curbside collection is flexible enough to accom- modate changes N economics, technology, or social conditions by changing the number of routes andior the frequency of collection to accommodate demand. • ConPegftgnces to the waste stream. Curbside c nation would result in a decrease in the amount of HHW disposed of N solid waste landfills. Presently, the County of San Bernardino recycles a significant amount of wastes collected at its periodic roundup events and permanent collection centers, particularly used oil. paint, gasoline, and batteries. Similar materials collected at curbside could also be recycled. • Timing. Curbside collection can be implemented in both the short-term (1990 to 1995) and medium-term (1995 to 2000) Planning periods. • Need for new or ett~t+ {tied facilities. Thi% alternative will require local, tempo- rary, storage facilities for collated materials to remain until transported to recycling, treahnent or disposal facilities unless the cpBecud materials are transponed off-site within l44 hoots. • Consi tencv with local plans policies. and orrl~nr.<. The City does not cur- rently have plans, pohcies, or ordinances [elated to the curbside collation of HHW. • i ci n t'n I 'ers toyplementagon. Vlhea HHW is separated fmm other wastes and consohdated, this material, although exempt from federal RCRA legislation, is subject to state regulations governing hazardous wastes in general. These regulations can make HHW collation programs expensive and complex to operate. In practice, the State Department of Health Services has greeted vari- ances to jurisdictions operating these programs m streamline the permitting process; storage, transpottation, manifest, and disposal tequitements remain st~in- gent. AB 2641 allows jurisdictions operating an HHW program to accept small 9 scs tH~wetes - quantities of hazardous wastes from commercial sources which meet speck cri- teria. Liabilities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa- tion and Liability Act ICERCLA) apply to either private companies or munici- pali[ies which opera[e a H}IW collection program. • Fase of implementation. If the City handles collection. it would be responsible for project planning, management, obtaining vehicles and equipment, hiring and [reining personnel, and promoting participation in the project. The City might also have to arrange for the use of a temporary storage facility. if a private parry collects and is otherwise responsible for the management of IIIIR', the City's rote would be to evaluate proposals to provide these services and to manage or moni- tor the Fum selected to collect IIIIw. • opt of ~ lementation. If the City provides this service, the acquisition of vehicles, equipment, and pcrsoonel would be necessary. Development or access to a temporary storage facility and costs associated with providing container: to residents may also bZ involved. Operating and maintenance costs would be chose associated with the collectioo, training, safety equipmen[, publicity, transpor- tation, and disposal of HH0.r. This alternative would be the most costly of [he [hree programs evaluated. • Av itab'R of end-u aim rk c, Markets vary for different types of materials. Stable markets exist to recycle motor oll, antifrceze, lead-acid batteries, paint products, and other solvenU. • [a + e1{perience. Because of the cost and liability associated with this type of program, this alternative has not beep implemented in many jurisdictions. • Retrional tc~b'hty. A curbside program may be regionally applicable if provided by a private hauler. Basal on anticipated amounts of IDIW, a regional 10 SCS iNGINEE9i - program may be more cost effective than a program for Rancho Cucamonea alone. • Public acceotance. From a convenience perspective, the public might appreciatz and utilize curbside service. However, it is difficult to predict public acceptance of this type of program. • Social responsibility. The only measure of social responsibility inquired is to maintain separation of HHW from other solid waste and to comply a~i[h pro¢tam requirements far collection of HHW. ' One-Dav Collection Events The evaluation of one-day collection events includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the nm¢tatn. Although not as convenient for residents as curb- side collection, this alternative does allow for "neighborhood" collection. The County of San Bema[dino, Department of Health Services, has co-sponsored a number of these one-0ay events (or roundups} with agencies of various cities. [n general, thex events have attracted less than 1 percent of the population on any given day. • H nrrlc cvr;~teA wi h ne nro¢rar,~^. Most collection events can minimize hazards by properly pWnning for spills or emergency response, or by limiting the types of hazardous materials brought to the site. Hazards are also limited through use of trained employees in all aspects of HHW handling. This type of program may have some hazard potential from residents improperly transporting HHW to the site where the event is held. One environmental impac[ of concern is traffic neaz the project site. However, [he periodic nature of these evens (quaRerty, semiannual, or annual) and the dispersal of collection sites wUl limit the frequency of traffic impacts. Il SCS eNGMEEaS - • Abrl ty to accommodate chan~rr . Mobile or one-day collection units are generally equipped to collect major types of HHW. They are very adaptable ro changing technologies or social conditions. •, o. nsequenc to th -watt at ~E++. Implementation of this alternative would lead to a decrease of HHW improperly disposed N solid waste landfills. Depending on what arrangements are made to collect and manage material collected, this alternative will also lead to increased recycling of HHW. • Timine. A mobile collection program can be implemented N both the shoe-term (1990 to 1995) and medium-term (1995 to 2000) planning periods. • Need for new or expanded fac'li ire, Implementation of this alternative will result in an increased usage of hararidous waste recycling, treatment, or disposal facilities. [n addition, this alternative may requite local, temporary smrage facilities unless the collected materials ate transported off-site within 144 hoofs. Although permitting of hazardots wane storage facilities is complex, current legislation allows temporuy storage facilities to be set up to receive and store certain types of hazardous wastes (motor oil, antifreeze, automobile batteries) for less than 90 days without obtaining the type of permits necessary to store other types of hazardous wastes for tonger periods. •, oncict wiL local p ana m ici a EEA o in EEr~a. This alternative is consistent with current City policy. • IEEar;mtio •t b rt+en to ' of m nt r' When HHW is separated from other wastes and consolidated, this material, although exempt from federal RCRA legis- lation, is subject to state regulations governing hazardous wastes in general. These regulatioos can make HHW collection programs expensive and complex to operate. [n practice, the State i)epamnent of Health Services has granted vari- ances to jurisdictions operating these programs to streamline the permitting 12 SCS ENG~NEEiS - process; storage, transportation, and manifest and disposal requirements remain stringent. AB 2641 allows jurisdictions operating an fiHW program to accept small quantities of hazardous wastes from commercial sources which meet spe~ c~c criteria. • Fase of implementation. To conduct this program, the City would need to find sites, arrange for a contractor to accept and properly manage HHW received at events. and publicize events throughout the City. • Cost of implementation. Costs of these types of programs depend upon the type and amount of materials collected, disposal costs, personnel costs (depending upon whether city or private companies provide staffing), site costs, Lability insurance, and publicity. If it is assumed that temporary facilities would be located on land owned by the City, there would be no land acquisition costs associated with this alternative. in general the cost, measured either on a per capita or amount of material received basis, should be considerably less than the fast alternative. • Availability of ead-uses markets. Markets vary for different types of materials. Stable markets exist for recycled motor oil, antifreeze, lead-acid batteries, paint products, and other solvents. • Qperatina eltperience. City and County agencies, as well as a numbec of licensed apemtors, have condoned programs of this type. Available data indicates that these programs may diveR 3 to 4 percent of the household hazardous waste currently disposed of in landfills. • Rey applicability. 'Chis alternative could be implemented locally or regionally. 13 SCi ENGINEERS - • Public acceptance. In general, this type of program is well received, althoueh if Located on City-owned land, :he public response would be a function of site location and its relationship ro nearby land uses. S~a~ !mac n ibi itv. Participation requires a moderate level of social responsi- bility whereby residents actively determine what materials ate classified as HHW' and transport materials to collection sites. Permanent Collection Sites The evaluation of permanent collection sites includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the oroerun. Experience with thex programs indicates that, in general, participation rates are higher than at one~ay events, though the amount of HHR' per vehicle delivered to the site is somewhat lower. it is estimated by the County of San Bernardino that the permanent collection sites operating in the County are collecting HHW from approximately 3 [0 4 percent of the houxholds anually. However, it is difficult to estimate the percentage of torsi FiFIW generated that is collected becaux of stockpiling and improper disposal, • ug,ards ascociarn wi h the pjggg~, Collection facilities can minimize hazards by properly planing for spills wed emergency resporx, and limiting the types of hazardous materiak brought to the facility through adequate publicity. Even assuming that all individuals handling HHW at thex facilities are properly trained and supervised, iecidemal spills should be anticipated in conjunction with this alternative. Contingency plans for other ticks of upset (i. e., fire, earthquake. etc.) would also have [o be implemented in conjunction with this altemanve. This type of program may have some hazard pomntial from residents improperly transporting Fl'HW to the site or depositing hazardous materials in the vicWty of the facility on days when the facility may not be open to receive wastes. Traffic problems may have to be mitigated, 14 S6 ENGMEERS - • Abu[y to accomm •t Ana ~, The capita! expenses and physical structures associated with a permanent collection facility are inherently limiting to its Flexibility. •~ Conw~u n to the waste arnam, Implementation of this alternative mould divert HIiV1' fmm landfills. The ultimate end-use of the HHW would depend on arrangements made with recyclers. • runine. Time required to obtain temporary storage permits would not neces- sarily preclude implementation during the short-tens (1991-1995) planning period. Permits required to site a pemtanent storage facility might preclude implementation until the medium term. • Need for new or a*.nand.n fay+1N~• The City of Rancho Cucamonga has an existing dmp-off site for HHW. Siting a new facility, or relocating the existing facility, would require a full evaluation of impacts N accordance with the California Environmental Quality Am (CEQA). Responsibility for pertniring of future sites would be assumed by the County of Sao Bernardino DENS ti the facility is to be operated under the umbrella of the County's HHW Management Plan. • onciu v wi a I •I C nna nns i c •nd o in rt`^s, g Pe The shin of rtnanent collection facilities is consistent with City policies. • Ln.tNt±oti bzr++e~ olementatoa. A'hen HHW is separated from other wastes and consolidated, this material, although exempt from federal ACRA legislation, is subject to state regulations governing hazardous wastes ta general. These regulations can make HHW collection programs expensive and complex to operate. In practice, the State Department of Health Services has gnrtted variances to judsdictioms operating these pmgrarns m streamline the permitting ptncess; storage, transportation, and manifest sad disposal requirements remain l5 56 FN4iNFENS - stringent. AB 2611 allows jurisdictions operating a HHW program to accept small quantities of hazardous wastes from commercial sources which meet speck criteria. • Face of implementation. To conduct this program, the City would, need to desig- nate afacility site, arrange for a contractor (or train Ciry personnel) to accep[ and properly manage HHW, and publicize the facility. As indicated under timing, it could take xveral years to obtain the various permits necessary to operate this type of facility. • Cost ofvnolementation. Assuming that a publicly acceptable site was chosen that could be used free of charge, there would be cosu [elated to salaries, liability insurance, workers compensation benefits, development. and maintenance of the physical plant (swctures, emergency or safety equipmrnt, storage containers, etc.), Publicity, and possibly transportation and disposal costs, • Av ila 'I'ly of end-t~,irnos, Marttas vary for different types of materials. Stable markets exist to recycle motor oil, antifrxze, automotive batteries, paint products, and solvents. However, not all materials colltcted at these events can be recycled. • Operatin¢ eagrteae. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, in cooperadon with the County of San Bernardino, has operated an HHW drop-off facility since August 1987. • $& 'modal app icab'lity. This alternative, like many other HHW alternatives dis- cussed in [Lis Element, could be expanded locally, subrogionally, or at a series of facilities throughout the County. • Public accedence. While the concept of the Cify operating a facility has, at the ptaxnt time, a mlatively high public acceptanSe, continued support may depend ^C l6 ICS FNGWEERS - to some extent upon encroachment on residential neighborhoods and relationship of the facility to adjacent land uses. Social resronsib~ty. Implementation of this alternative would require that citizens be aware of what materials are hazardous and be willing to transport HHW' to the drop-off facility. EVALUATION OF RECS'CLLNG ALTERNATIVE Droo-Off at Retail Stores The evaluation of retail dropoff centers includes the following criteria: • Effectiveness of the oroemm. This program would oNy result in the diversion of certain types of HHW (paint and automobile-related products). Other programs may be requved to divert other forms of HFIW. • Hazards associated with the oro¢tam. Although these materials ate handled on a regular basis at these types of businesses, there is a nerd to ensure [hat all per- sonnel ate properly trained to handle these materials. Persottrrel would need to know what materials can 1>e accepted and how to handle them. Incidental spills shouid be anticipated. Also, since some materials ate flammable there is some danger of fue unless caution is exercised. • A~b'1{y to accommodate chance. This alternative is rolatlvely inflexible in regard to the types of materials accepted, quantities, or changes in economics. Techno- logical changes, such as material changes that may require special handling, may also t>e difficult to keep up with on a long-term basis. 17 56 ENGINEERS - • Consequences to the waste stream. Implementation of this alternative mould reduce the disposal of HHW in landfills, and since it specifically targets recycla- ble wastes, the recyclin¢ of HHW would increase. • Timine. This alternative can be implemented 'ut both the short-term (1990 to 1995) and medium-term (t995 to 2000) planning periods. • FactLities required or expanded tounolement the oroer~m. implementation of this alternative mill provide a direct means ro recycle certain types of EII-IW, This alternative will not create a need for other facilities. • Consistency with local plans. policies. and ordinances. The City does no[ cur- rently have any policies or ordinances related to this type of program. • Institutional barriers to implementation. When FiFiW is separated from other wastes and consolidated, this material, although exempt from federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) legislation, is subject to state regulations governing hazardous wastes in general. These regulations can make HHW col- lection programs expensive and complex to operate. Ia practice, the State Depamnegt of Health Services has granted variances to jursdictions operating these programs to streamline the permitting process; smrage, transponation, and manifest and disposal requirements remain stringent. • Fase of implemwtadog. The City andlor a nonprofit organvation would have to promme this program among targeted businesses, assist in finding recyclers, and publicize the availability of drop-off facilities throughout the City. • Cost of implementation. If this alternative is selected, the City might have to assume the cost of gauting acceptance of the program by automobile-related businesses and the cost of publicizing locations of businesses which choose to cooperate. lg SCS fNGWEfES - • Au ' abili{y of end-~rP /__~ ma_*kc3c, This alternative would require the detlvery of HHW to businesses or to a central collection point. All of the products to be collected through this program are recyclable. • (hrerafine exoerienSg• Some states require gasoline service stations to accept aante oil from do-it-yourself oil changers, and auto supply stores take back old car batteries. However, there is little experience with retailers handling other waste products, and some concern has been expressed regarding liability in accepting potentially contaminated products such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in waste oil. • Reeional aoo iCab'llty. This alternative could be implemented locally or through- out the County. • Public aeceatance. This type of program is weB received by the general public, which needs convenient locations to dispose of waste oil. The response of tar- geted businesses may be mixed, with many concema~ ouw~ i:rcreased costs relative to their competitors, as well as unclear liability regarding the handling of hazardous wastes, • ial y~sib~h~. Participation requires a moderate level of social responsi- bility whereby residents actively identify the types of mamtials classed as HHR' and transport materials to collection sites. EVALUATION OF PUBLIC EDUCATION/LNFORVIAtION ALTERNATIVE The evaluation of the public education information alternative includes the following criteria: Effectiveness of Le oro¢rtm. Public information can he very effective but only over a long period of time and with much repetition. It is not possible, however, to quantify diversion fmm such programs. 19 SCS ENG!NEf RS - Hazards as fated with [h pros---.. 'There are no known hazards or environ- mental unpacts associated with [his altemative. • Ability to ac ommodate thanes. These programs can be mod~ed as necessary [c respond to changing conditions. • consequence to th wade h From along-range perspective, effective pubbe information and education programs should reduce the amount of HFIW purchased and disposed. • ?5tnine. This alternative can be implemented N both the short-term ((990 to 1995) and medium-term (1995 to 2000) planning periods. • Fac'u iec eeguirrrl or expanded to i~ptement the oro¢.am. No facilities are required. • oncico-nG_v wi h l ~[ yla_na oo'cie d o " No local plans, policies. or ordinances limit the implementation of public information and education programs. • InctimCort?[ ha ' rs to ' of tioo. There ate no institutional barriers to conducting public information programs. • vice of imnlemen arinn. Implementation requires allocation of adequate resources to fully enact the program. • I~ppjementarion cotta Costs can v si tcand d azY Bn~ Y. spending on the nature of the program. [f implemented 6y the City, an information education program may require a 25 ptteent time commitment from the Waste Reduction Coordinator or other designated emplgyee. The development and cuculation of informa- 20 iCi iNGINEEPS - [ional/educational materials would probably cost between 510,000 and 520.000 per year. • Av~ab'u[y of end-usesi markets. If education emphasizes the use of nonhazard- ous over hazardous materials, implementation may reduce the need to recycle HHW. • noetadne experience. Many communities operate these programs throughout the country. • Dory! a„E+E+ftic~biliN. 'I7[is alternative could be implemented locally, sub- regionally, or throughout the County. However, a program tailored to local needs could better be implemented locally. • Public acceptance. Public acceptance of this type of program would undoubtedly be high. • Sociaf`E*sE[nnsibtlity. Implementation of this alternative will [equire a measure of social responsibility on behalf of citizens. PROGR.:1.~I SELECTION As stated in the Iptroductiom to this Element, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently participating ip the San Bernardino County Household Hazardous Waste Managemen!'Pro- gram, HHW diversion programs specific to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and currently [n effect ate: • One permanent drop-off facility for HHW. • Periodic one-day collection "events." 2l • Public education and information materials. Types and Quantities of Materials Expected to be Collected- SCS ENGINEERS - The types of materials collected at a one-day event held in the City N April 1990 is pre sensed in Table L Used motor oil comprised the majority of material brought to this event. [t is anticipated that maredals collected at a permanent facility would be roughly equivalem to those collected at this event and at other one-day events and permanent si[es located in San Bemardino County. The provision of curbside collection service for used oil might decrease the relative proportion of oil delivered to the permanent site. Recycling Efforts, Disposal Pncticev, and End-rFSess for Diverted Materials- It is anticipated that a considerable fraction of the materials collected through the selected programs will be amenable to reuse or recycling. Motor oil, antifrxu, certain solvents, oil and latex-based paints, and automotive batteries ate all currtntly reused or recycled. The County of San Bernardino estimates that these materials accounted for 85 to 90 percent of all materials collected through the County program during 1989-90. Hamdling and Disposal- Materials which cannot be mused or recycled will b< disposed of, N accordance with all applicable regulations relating to the labeling, transport, and disposal of hvardous waste, by the County of San Bernardino, Departaent of Fnvitoomental Health Services, under a Memorandum of Understanding with that Department. A l7frsquate-foot shed designed for short-term storage of hazardous materials provided with an eye/hand wash urrit is located on the premises. Materials will be stored in 55-gallon drams and tabpuked in accordance with approved hazardous waste handling procedures. Other informatioe relating m disposal has been discussed N previous sections of this Element. 22 Required Facilities- SCS EhGiHFfRS - A permanent collection facility located nt the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been previously described. Under a cosponsorship agreement with the County, in addition to providing a site, the City purchased all materials necessary for the constmction of a concrete pad and the installation of a storage shed and used oil tank. San Bernardino County provided the storage shed and tank. Public Education Prognm- The City has an extensive public information and education program, emphasizing not only the safe disposal of HHW through use of the drop-off center, but the use of nontoxic alternatives. A variety of media, including newsletters, local cable television announce- ments, and Flyers are utilized N this effort. The targeted audience includes not only residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga but residents of the surrounding unincorporated area. All materials are prepared in both Engksh and Spanish. Cooperative and/or ~fukijurtvdictiaoal Pro`rams- The HHW Collection Center is a cooperative project baween the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services. A representa- tive copy of the agreement entered inm between this jurisdiction and the County is attached as an appendix to this Element. Exoansian of Esistina Proanm9 Increasing the normal hours of operation of the Collection Center, expanding the hours of operation during special community eokectioo events, and relocating the cokection center are presently under consideration by the City. za Yew Proaratas $CS FNpiNEFRS - Vo new programs are currently being considered. Details of current County and City programs are provided N the Existing Conditions Sec[ion of this Element. These programs have been selected in order to provide the widest range of aitematives to the residents of this jurisdiction, within budgetary and liability constraints. PROGRA.VI L~LE~IEY1'ATIOY Resooasible Ae o ies San Bernardino County DENS provides overall coortlination and operation of the program. The permanent collection site io the City of Rancho Cucamonga is under the direction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. IdentLtycation of Tasl~ Pla n. Periods. and Costs All tasks relative to permitting, operation, and conSWCtlon of this permanent collection site have been completed. The following table summarizes daily operational tasks, approximate costs, and implementation schedules attendant W each task: Operate Collection Ceoter; Open every 5atutday from 5132,500 tao persons on duty during 10:00 s.m. to 2:00 p.m. operating haurs. 24 ~fO~TTORING A.~7) EVALtiATION Selected Method SCS SNGWEFNS - Strict monitoring and reporting requir°_ments are attached to the collection of any type of hazardous material. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will record the amounts of each type of EII-IW delivered to its drop-off facility. This ptaess will account for a certain volume or weight of FffIN which, theoretically, has been diverted from landfill disposal. Using an average figure for the amounts of fiflW normally disposed of by individual or household. and comparing it to the amounts of FlllW collected, will provide an estimate of diversion rates attained. Evaluative Criteria The effectiveness of the City's programs will be evaluated according to the amounts of fi}lw collected and by whether those amounts increase, decrease, or remain stable over time. Monitoring and evaluation of the City's EfHW diversion programs will be Etirected by the Office of the City Manager. No speck funding requirements related to monitoring and evaluation have been identified. In the event the programs selected are judged to be ineffective, the City will consider the implementation of any of the other programs evaluated in this Flement. These actions 25 SCS ENGMFfiS - would include expanding hours at collection facilities, increasing public education, expanding drop-off at retail stores through regulations if necessary, or initiating collection of used ui7. EDC"C?.TIO'V .1\'D PL-BLIC LYFORWITIOY O iv The objectives of the FIHW Element for the City of Rancho Cucamonga are as follows: • In the short- and medium-tens planning periods, to increase public awareness of hazardous materials and proper disposal methods. • To increase public awareness of nontoxic alternatives to 6azanlous products. • To increase the level of participation in existing progruns. A general overview of the City's Pubbe Information R'ogrun has been previously described. Responsibility for these programs tests generally with the County of San 13emardino, although the County will make available to individual cities camera-ready copies of educa- [ional and publicity materials for direct mail purposes. ytonitoring, and Evaluatbn Selected ~tethodr The City of Rancho Cucamonga will use the following methods to evaluate achievement of the objectives set forth above: xr 26 • Amount of materials collected. • Number of residents utilizing the Collection Cen[er. Responsibility for these programs will rest with the City Manager's Office. Implementation Schedule Stonitoring of Collection Center activities will begin immediately. Fundina of Education and Pub 'c ~rormation Proan SCi fNG~rv EfR3 - The County of San Benvardino has budgeted 550,000 for Countywide education and informa- tion programs for fiscal year 1991-1992. Of this amount, approximately 34,600 will be directed toward progruns targeting the population of Rancho Cucamonga. Revenues for these programs are derived from a 51.20 per tow surcharge oo tipping fees at County landfills. FL'NDLYG The total cost to operate the City's tIHW Collection Center for one year is esthmated to be 5132,500. Finances for all operational aspects of the HHVV Collection Center will be contri- buted by the County of San 13etnaNino. Revenues ate derived from the landfill tipping fee surcharge. The City of Rancho Cucamonga provides funding for costs [elated to labor. At the present time, Ure HHW Collection Center is manned by on-duty fire departrnent person- nel. The City does not consider this to represent an additional labor cost. Annual costs for the short term are shown below. State grant money may be available to the County of San Bernardino as an additional fundine source. The County is in the process of submitting a grant apphcatioo to the California Integrated Waste Management Board, but this process is in a preluninary stage. Revenues derived from the surcharge on tipping fees at County landfills ate inherently aliable, but in 27 56 FNG~NEEPS - the case of discontinuance of [he County progEam, the City will consider alternative revenue sources including, but not Whited to, advance disposal fees on certain products, user fens a[ the Collection Center, private donations, or restricted hoofs. If advance disposal fees mere used it would be N conjunction a~ith a statewide progEam to avoid public confusion and dislocation of the local economy. 28 SCS ENGINEf PS - Taat,E 1 E3[HNA'fED PAR?1C9PATRRY Alm WASSE TYPFS COLLECf6D, 19Ef-1999. RANCHO CEJCAMONGA FIOUSEHOLB HAZARDOUS WASL£ COLLECTION CFlPCER Partmipmts fFstimatM) L070 Days of Op<ntiao Saturday ~~ Hours 10 a. m. - 2 p.m. ~ Paint 5.600 coauinen ' Oil 5,740 galloon ~ Flammabla l7A gallon Poisons 120 gallons ,4cida d0 galloon Rasa 0 galloon 29 SCS ENGINEERS - TAELE l WASTE QUAKCICIES ALm TYPES AT COLLP.CI'i~V EVENT, RANCEIO CUCAMONGA, CALIPBQNfA. APRR. Us 1990 I Parti: ipmts 618 Paint 59 drums ~fiscellaoeous SLalloo Cana 120 tens Oil 2.160 galloon Flammable 120 gallon Poison 60 gallon Banenn 166 uoib Acids 10 galloon Bue 10 gallon Oxidimn 5 gallon Antifteem 10 gWons Gasoline 50 yllooa l'nknowm 20 gallons Miacellaomua Dntmt 24 dtutas S~ SCS ENGINEERS - APPENDIX A HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE AGREEMFN!' ;~n,..x.na, 1 _ Y n^.^, E vew .erco C:ce V ..act ^~,;react 1~.,r•;e• r r ~'Y~I~~d~~ M~ C~.nq.. t /a ~ ~ i % ~ GncN Jlri EHS Ai 9 t- .X. ,x. '. County tlee/Rment Oaoe. Orpn. Canarenor . lrnma No i~lp~i~~ ~Env:roncental Hea:['r. 3vs 'cis 522 ' County OaP/rtmMt ,.ortract Reoneentrzm Pn. En. ~, Amount of Camna ~'SUdv Or:ccng i629 ;0.90 County at San Bamardlno i Fvna oem C•g.n•.unon APRr ohl; Rer scarce ~I ncnvlrv GRC,Pnosuoe Numoe. F A S AAA ~'~ Eis _: ' CommoaltY Coae - Emmrt.a Pgm.nt Tovl ov Fi/W Yur STANDARD CONTRACT uo Fv amount vo FY nmaont o P'OINL N/me i ouseno LQ Haze-ca -_ -_ -_ _ i1a5'e THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the County of San Bernartlino. herelnafrer calletl the County, and v/m. 3anc nc _: camonga nereinener calletl 'Ci=y' Aaa"" acd ?enc-o Caranenga .`zre Da cr:c: cere:naf ter called 'FUe O:a[nct' Fear" enn om rMMY 10 M a SpGY SMY11V NO. ~~~4 a~ r~e•` IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ~: ;J rux /uac+ aW w ana WEiGanN a"rk tluan. SN terra NIYKa ro M nne/rM. NrMYnr ra M P/re. mMnN e/ NYrranr, rN" IN pwiamNrca or comdrran. OIfNTY"fIM PI llnll/[tpy PNIp,mNIC/ Nq CN.I ICY tMMnNMn. OtI1N rMm) Mq COlid"IMa, NIe IR/Ca LVN, ap/H/K/IAYR. MC /OeMe/, rl /nY I HDDSEHDLD HAZARDODS WASTE AGREEl~NT IT ZS }ffiREBY AGREED AS POLI,OWS: This agreement is made and entered into hatween the County of San Darnardino, hereinafter referred to as "County", the Rancho Cucamonga Fira District hereinafter referred to as the "Fire District" and the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter referred to as the "City". RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Department of Environmental Health Services referred to as "DENS" is a department of the County responsible for the safe management of hazardous waste; WHEREAS, the DENS desires the services of the Fira District and City to operate a household hazardous waste coilaction center to provide for the proper disposal of household hazardous waste; WHEREAS, the Fira District and City desire for the protection, health, and welfare of the public and its personnel, the removal of hazardous wastes from homes so that such materials will pose no danger in event of Lira. Now, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants and conditions the parties hereto agree as follows: wITNESSETA: RESPONSIBYISTIES AND DUTIES OF THH PIRE DISTRICT AND CITY Tha Fire District and City agree to operate a household hazardous waste collection center for the County at the following location: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Station 83, 12158 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga, California, in accordance with DEHS established procedures. Employees of the Fire District and City will accept the specified wastes at least ono day each week. The designated employees of the Fire District and City will label, categorize, and pack the wastes in accordance with DEHS requirements. The wastes will be stored in their original containers and placed in the 55-gallon drums inside the storage shed located within the fenced area of the facility. The Fire District and City shall ba responsible Lor providing workers compensation benefits for any and all its employees or volunteers under a state approved policy or sell insurance program. The Fire District and City shall be responsible for maintenance 01 yard property and for the safety o1 persons and materials on this property. It shall not be necessary for the Fire District to have a person present at all times on the sits where the material will be stored. The Fire District and City agree to indemnify and hold harmless the County and their agents, officers, volunteers and employees against any and all claims or actions arising from Fira District's and City's negligent acts or omissions related to said collection center operations by the Fire District and City. 71ND DOTZES OF THE CODNTY DEHS, the generator, shall assume responsibility for obtaining the necessary site permits. Further, the DEHS will train Fire District and Clty personnel and provide an operation manual, "The Handbook Lor Operational Procedures", which deeignate• waste to be accepted, daf ines a cat egorization scheme for wastes anticipated, and specifies emergency procedures to be followed. DEN5 shall provide an initial training program for Fire District and city employees prior to ope^:nq the facility and annually thereafter. If there are changes -o the "Handbook of Operational Procedures" special training sessions shall be provided. The "Handbook of operational Procedures" shall be consistent with all state and federal regulations applicable to Household Hazardous waste facilities and amended as necessary. The DEH5 shall provide a secure storage shad. Tha DENS will also provide necessary steel drums of 55-gallon capacity, meeting DoT specifications for the disposal of hazardous waste and sufficient absorbent materials for overpacking the waste containers. At the termination of thin contract, all items provided by DEH5 shall be returned to its poeaession, unless other written arrangements are made. DENS employees shall be available to assist the Fire District and City on a 24-hour basis should an emergency arise at the facility. The County shall independently contract with a licensed hazardous waste hauler to remove the accumulated wastes, as needed, and to recycle or dispoas of wastes at a Class 1 disposal site. The County agrees to indemnify and hold harmiesa the Firn District and City and their authorized agents, of ticera, volunteers and employees against any and all claims or actions arising from County's negligent acts or omissions related to County's activities pursuant to thi• agreement. CONTRACT cOt4PLIA_kCE contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of the Affirmative Action Compliance program o! the County of San Bernardino and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. Executive orders 11246, 11375, 11625, 12138, 12432, 12250, Titl• VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the California Pair Employment Practice Act, California Public contracts Code 2000 and the San Bernardino County N/WBE Policy No. 11-15, and other applicable Federal, State and county laws, regulations and policies relating to equal employment and contracting opportunities, including laws and regulations hereafter enacted. Information on these rules and regulations may be obtained from the Contract Compliance officer of the County of San Bernardino at (714) 387-8896. TERM AND TEitlQNA.TYOM This agreement shall be effective September 1, 1991 and shall remain in effect through September 1, 1994 but may be renewed for specified periods, unless otherwise terminated or amended. Funding for this contract is based on a tipping fee surcharge on Solid Waste disposed at County landfills. IL the City of Rancho Cucamonga arranges Lar alternative solid waste management, this contract must be renegotiated to provide funding for the services provided by the County in this contract. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may terminate this contract at any time upon 30 days prior written notice to the other party. COUNTV OF SAN BERNARDINO Chavman, Board of Superviaon Dated SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. Clerk of the Board of Supervlaors of the County of San Bernardino. eY AOpIOVW N [0 11Q11 f~JIT ! •n it capora ' , c ny, arc.l e~ - AL/l4o lAuNOrit spnnur4 Dated S-8.9/ rna ~roti4eli~ ~.C'.FP.~. Addrasa~o. ~r Fa7 (S als Acorpor etc.r By IAUrnon ap $IQn/(uI/I Dated R~ R- 9/ Title ~~7 C.l~ ~dme ~ C(Ile~j mcr~ Address po. ~x Fo7 ~r uncl,~ C.cA .~ a cA 5i~a9 ~'iia~n~lo r,.n~r ~A 9(,a9 Rswwaa N [R AlhrmltlW ACLIOa COUnty COVIINI i G+N Av1Ir 00pM X610 oft. R1VI1W1tl (Of NOCN11nQ ApMCy AaminOtra[on CAO plta - o.p1 _1_- ~~ ~_ SCS ENG~NEFFS - APPENDDCB COhth1ENTS AND RESPONSES TO THE PuFi ~~NARY DRAFT SA:£OF C4:F00.`M A ~ CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD ~~~~~K Smmmlq Gtifomi~ 95®b November 4, 1991 William J. Alexander Mayor Pro Tem city of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91720 SUBJECT: Preliminary Draft Household Hazardous Waste Element for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mayor Alexander: The California Zntegrated Waste Management Board (Board) staff have reviewed the City of Rancho Cucamonga's draft Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) for compliance with Article 6.3 of Chapter 9, Title 16 of the California Coda of Regulations (CCR), Planning Guidelines and Procedures for Preparing and Revising Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plans (Guidelines). All references to CCR sections relate to the draft Article 6.7 unless otherwise noted. These comments, and all other comments received by the City should be addressed in the revised HHWE. As a reminder, AB 939 allows jurisdictions to work cooperatively on their programs, but the statutes at ill place the accountability on each individual jurisdiction for the successful implementation of their recommended programs. ePECIFTC QOMMENTB Existing conditions As required by CCR section 18751.7(c), please provide an estimation of the amount of household hazardous wastes that are currently being illegally disposed and on known illegal disposal methods. ~, Paq• z3, Coatiagancp alana The City plans to consider the implementation of "any oP the other programs evaluated in the HNWE". The MHWE 19 a planning document and by including specific contingency plane, a city will be better prepared for any unforeseen problems that may occur as this process moves from the planning stage to the implementation stage. Therefore, we strongly suggest that more specific programs be targeted for implementation as contingency measures in the final HHWE. MnW mRSFLEhW_ Mayor Alexander November 6, 1991 Page 2 Page 24, Yundlnq CCR section 18~51.8(b) requires cost estimates for element programs schedule for implementation in the short-term planning period. Therefore, please provide cost estimates for 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1995. Paq• 25 One contingency funding source the City of Chino has identified is the imposition of advance disposal Pees on certain products. Please describe hov this program will operate (i.e., will fees he imposed on local, state, national or international manufactured products, etc.). In addition, please describe hov a local advance disposal foe program will work in conjunction with proposed legislation addressing this issue on a statewide basis. This concludes the comments on the Preliminary Household Hazardous Waste Element Lor the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please address the comments in this letter and revise the HHWE accordingly. IL ve may be of any assistance during the revised HHWE development phase, please contact me at (916) 255-2319 or Toni Galloway of the Division's Local Assistance South Section at (916) 255-2309. Sincerely, -~.~~) John D. Smit~SUparvisar Local Assistance Branch Planning and Assistance Division cc: San Bernardino County Local Task Force SCS Engineers RESPONSE TO CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD COMMENTS ON DRAFT HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT Ex aura Condit ors 1. General Comment :he ;squired =_stcrates r,a ve teen .nci~d ed in the final HHWE. 2. Page 23 7!o re detailed tnfor ~~aticn on contingency plans has been included in the final HHWE. 3. Page 2t Ccst estimates for prcgrams scheduled for i-p lementation in the short-term planning period have been included in the final HHWE. ~. Page 25 Additional information on how the advance disoosal fee co r.t ingency reasure would coordinate with State efforts has been included in the final HHWE. CIT'! OF RANCHO C_'CA.`!Ol7GA SRRE S HHWE CO!^1ENTS FROM CCMPOSTI9G, SL;PJG E, SEPTI6, S HHW CObLM ZTTEE SAN BER4ARC:>;0 CO L?iTY' SCL:O WASTE ADVISORY TASK-FORCE CCTC3ER 1991 HOSE=:C LO HA ZARCCCS 'BASTE ELF E4T CC!~SSENTS Face t t should be noted that the regulations for AB 9]9 required the coup L'n.g of empty ccntalners, which era not :egal:y Household .Hazardous wasta~ The amount cf actual hoasahold Hazard a3s ••«a ra ^ay to lower than the amcunt found .n CHe Solid 'Haste Ge r.e ration Study, Paean '2-1] rffe^•~ve^esa ^f •tie orcaram. The end of this sect :on shou:d to changed to read, "It is estimated by the County oC San Barra rd:no tnat the Permanent colleceion sites :n the County are co L ecu Hg HHw from 7 to 9 percent of the households annual:y." :Beta should also ba an exp:anation that a is not possible co astiaats the parentage of total •ra'd generated that is collected because of stockpiling and realdants noC conaider:r.q items NNW if they nre still uaabla. ZL is elso Hoc known what percentage of households generate HHW or the avu age storage time. /MG RESPONSE TO THE COMPOSTING, SLUDGE, SEPTIC, AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COMMITTEE OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SOLID WASTE ADVISORY TASK-FORCE, OCTOBER 1991 cus=_r.o ld hazardous '.aasce c ^. oraen~s Paqe 1 ..._ a sue _. _~.,~a :Hers has __en added to the ..na1 4Ht9F. 2. Paq® 12-13 :hose cna nges na~:e cee r. rage to the :ina1 N.HWE. ~. W~ i W. ~ C- January 21, 1992 Fontana Pavi nq, Inc. P.O. 8oz 84'1 Fontana, CA 92335 SUBJECT: RELEASE OF BOND - CONTRACT 87-003. RESIDENTIAL BTAEET RE HABIL STATION, 1985-1986 PHASE II Gentlemen The City Council, at ire regular meeting of June 17, 1987, released your Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $107,686.80, Enough time has elapsed since the release of this bond and no claims have been subm ittetl. Therefore, your Labor and Material Bond in the amount of 553,943.40 ie now being released. IE you have any questions, please call me at 989-1851, Ext eneron 2009 Sincerely, Debra J. Aflame City Clerk By: / f ,tan Sutton, Deputy city Clerk OJA:jls cc: Engineering Enclosed . .. ., ,. ~Si !gilt ~ .:'i lf`(:n MnM ~r,.,.II'g A' ]I'.5 .' b -. .,, .. ~ nvOn~l9r .. ,..,^.r ~~nnm Onr Fa n~u~, ~ Nny n' !1 ,l. ~. ~ ^I~MOnt]Q9~ ~ ~ iIY~Fl Tb„! ~; I`il11P5 Fii~)IJ A~ ' CONTRACT 60ND N0. 5017815 LABOR AND NATERI ALS DOND g10N ALL MEN BT THESE PRESENTS: THAT FONTANA PAVING, INC. a5 principal, and SAFECO INSURANC° COMPANY nF untroir as 5u rety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Aa nc ho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, in the just and full amount of FIFTY THPEE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FORTY THREE and 40 100 53 X43.40) words for the payment whereof we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, ezecuto rs, adm tni st ra tors succes sa rs and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. -~ Give under our hands and sealed with our seals this 24thday of December 19 86 The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, WEREAS, the above-named print ipal is about to enter into a contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal agrees to construct Residential Street Rehabilitation, 1985-86 (Phase II) in accordance with the AGREEMENT dated 19_, as provided in said contract, which said contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof to the same extent as if the same were herein specifically set forth; NOY, THEREFORE, if the said principal or principal's suhcontrac to rs fail to pay for any materials, provisions, tuDPltes or equipment used in, upon, for or about the performance of said work contracted [o be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the su reLy will pay for the same in an amount not exceed the sum heref na bove specified, and in case suit is brought G- 3 CONTRACT LABOR pND NATERCAIS BOND hereon, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed 6y the Lourt, otherwise this bond shall be void and of no effect; PROVIDED, that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to said contract, or agreement, or of any feature or ftem/items of performance required therein or thereunder shall in any manner affect the obligation of the undersigned on or under this bond; and the surety does hereby naive notice of such amendmen4, limtta Lion of time for bringing action on this bond by the City, change extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract or agreement and of any feature or item or items of performance required ne rein or thereunder. This band snail insure to the benefit of any and all persons entitled to file claims under Sec Lion 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of California, and shall give a right of action to such persons or their assigns fn any suit brought upon this Hood. YITNESS our hands this 24th day of December 1%6 FONTANA PAVING INC. 8U SS N N Rlcnartl Vallecofsa by i tl a Ylce Prealden[1 General Manager / Henry Bentlzala b c., - ~ {r~ri tie se<rerarvitrnasurer Individual partnership x Corporation Other, explain •51611ATURES OF CONTRACTOR MUST BE AC1010YLEOGEO BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACA101LEDBIEIIT fORNS (lNDIYIDUAL, PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION. ETC.). SAFECO iNSUARANCE COMPANY OF FMERICA -----Tur~y.~.---- ------ - G-4 ~a-f?~Tran`25:-Toes-~}-~irhey-in-fz~,! ~? :~ ~; C ~~I O January 21, 1992 Bruce Paving 313 W. Gardena Blvd. Gardena, CA 90248 SUBJECT: RELEASE OF BOND - CONTRACT 87-007 ARCHZBALD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS AT A: 6 SF RAILROAD CROSSING NORTH OF 8TH STREET Gentlemen The City Council, at its regular meeting of June 17, 1987, Gels as ed your Faithful Performance Rond in the amount of 572,319.00. Enough time has elapsetl since the release of this bond and no claims have been submitted. Therefore, your Labor and Material Bond in the amount of $36,943.40 is now being released. If you have any que at ions, ple see call me at 989-1851, Extension 2009 Sincerely, D JA:jle cc: Engineering Enclosed •• .. •1cr.a R Debra J. Adams City Clerk BY: / -~i~ Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk ..,r-. . mt~r .r .'~ .r m Lq ~.. .: .~.,~•... : I .':Jr n~ :.'i;. C O N T R A C T BOND N0: 1099553 PREMIUM: INCLUDED ISSUED IN nUADRUPLICATE LABOR AMD MATERIALS BOND KNOY ALL MEN OY THESE PRESENTS: THAT BRUCE PAVING CO. as principal, and AM4IEST SURETY COMPANY as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, in the just and full amount of THTA2Y 5;:;{ THO[15AND ONE HUBDR~D r-~^'+ ~ (535.1;9.501 words for the payment whereof we hereby Dind ourselves, our heirs, ezecu tors, administrators successors and assigns, Jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Give under our fiands and sealed with our seals this 3CTH day of DECEMBER, 19 86 . The condition of the foregof ng obligation is such that, NFEREllS, the above-named principal 1s about to enter into a contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said prlncl pal agrees to construct Archibald Avenue Improvements at the A.T. d S.F. Railroad Crossing north of 8th Street in accordance with the gFREEMENT dated DECEMBER 17. 19 IIE as provided in said contract, which said contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof to the same extent as if the same were herein specifically set forth; MOY, THEREFORE, 1f the said principal or principal's subcontractors fail to pay for any materials, provisions, supplies or equipment used in, upon, for or about the performance of said work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, ar for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the surety will pay for the same in an amount not exceed the sum herelnabove specified, and 1n case suit 1s Drought G-3 CONTRACT LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND hereon, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court, otherwise this bond shall be void and of no effect; PROYIDED, that no amendment, change, extension of Lime, alteration, or addition to said contract, or agreement, or of any feature or item/items of performance required therein or thereunder shall in any manner affect the obligation of the undersigned on ar under this bond; and the surety does hereby waive notice of such amendment, limitation of time for bringing action on this Dond by the City, change extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract or agreement and of any feature or item or items of performance required herein ar thereunder. This bond shall insure to the benefit of any and all persons entitled to file claims under Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of California, and shall give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. NITMESS our hands this 30TH day of DECEMBE.4 19 86 . BRUCE PAVING CO. . i .r __ tle~ _ Individual Partne~-- ~COrporatian Other, explain 'SIGNATURES OF CON'TRAC'TOR MUST BE ACKMOMLED6ED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACKNOYLFII6lENT fORlLS (TMDIYIOUAL, PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION, ETC.). °.~asJFST suaETv coMRANv _ ria'~;' ~G~~ suR~r -- ----- .. ~' ~ G-4 rr ATTORfJE Y-1N-FAf,T .,, i, ~. . .. "V~. RU~r February 19, 1992 Amwest Surety Insurance Co. P.O. Box 4500 Woodland Hills, CA 91365 Dear Sir: Recently we tried to return bonds to two contractors who did capital improvement projects far the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Both of these bonds were issued by your company, and both convactors' have moved and left us with no forwazding address. Per the advice of our city attorney. I am forwazding these letters to you for disposition. "fhe first one is m Bruce Paving of Gardena, for otu contract number 87-007, labor and Material Bord number 1099553 in the amount of $36,159.50. The second one is to Bay District Paving Company of Gardena, for our contract number 89.168, Maintenance Guarantee Bond number 1190816-A in the amount of $3.044.49. If you have any questions regarding [here bond releases, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 989-1851, extension 2W9. Sinccrcly. _-arn ~~[,~-r- Jan Sutton Deputy Ciry Clerk /m enclosure N N C S m o P s- ~ C ~ VF 'r P Q' Q ] __~G ~ U U - 4 ~ N U ti bI ~~ ~ 6' 3 N1 u ro ~.) ~ J ~ m w 4 ti A I m n u January 21, 1992 Vance Corporation 3940 Pyrite Street Riveraid e, CA 92509 SUBJECT: RELEASE OE BOND - CONTRACT 87-016 ( EERY' STREE° IMPAOVEM.ENTS. BETWEEN LEMON AVENUE AND MANO AKIN COURT Gentlemen The City Council, at its regular meeting of June 3, 1907, approved the re leaee of your Faithful Performance Bontl in the amount of $109,397.05. Enough time hae elapsed ein ce the release of this bond and no claims have been aubm fitted. Therefore, your Labor and Material Bond in the amount of $54,698.53 fie also being released. If you have any questio na, please ca 11 me at 989-1051, Extension 2009 5 incere ly, Debra J. Adams City Clerk Jary Sutton, Deputy City Clerk DJA:77.e ce: Engineering Enclosed ~. C O N T R A C T soot so. 509969 Yren iun: SS3I.00 FAITHFUL PFRFORNANCE BOND °_xecu we in quedrunl icate KNON ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT Vance Co rvo ration. 3950 Ycrite St., 3ivers ide, CA , as principal, and a.` ro Ios r~..c Co-~ ant of .1n rica as surety, dre field dnd firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, in the fUSt dnd full dagUllL of f a~ d 9'ne Thou anri .9re hundred a2d wOr s Sine[v Seven po liars and Five Cents (f 19,391.05 ) gu re s payment whereof we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, ,iolntly and severally, finely by these presents. Given under our hands and sealed with our seal this ori, day of Feb ruarv 19 87. the condition of the foregoing obligation iS such that, MEREAS, the above-named principal 1s about to enter into a contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal agrees to construct Improvement of 8ery1 Street Between Lemon Avenue and Mandarin Court in accordance with the AGREEMENT dated which said contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof to the same extent as if the same were herein specifically set forth; NON, TIEREFORE, 9f the said principal shad well and truly do and perform all things agreed by the principal in said contract to be done and performed, then this obligation is to be void; othenuise it will remain in full force and effect; PROYIDEO, that for value received the undersigned stipulate and agree that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration or additt on to said contract, or agreement, or of any feature or item or items of performance required G-1 CORTRACT FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND therein or thereunder shall in any manner affect the obligations of the undersigned under this bond; and the surety does hereby waive notice of such amendment, llmitattan of time for bringing action on this bond by the City, change, extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract or agreement and of any feature or time of performance required therein or thereunder. NITNESS our hands this g~ day of eebr~„~~: 19s~ . Ti tl ~/~.it by Title _ Individual Partnership Corporation _, Other, explain 'SI6NATUIES OF LOMIRACiOR IRISi BE ACKNOM.ED6E0 BEFBRE A NOTARY PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACI(NOM.ED~]E11T FOR16 (dNDIYI011AL, PARTNERSHIP. CORPORlITIpI. ETC. ) . I ~ :O Lan ri_ lla mrdiw r(_ \I'JC ic.A _. _ ._ _ .. ~ F :Sn't h.~ .1. Ch,i.c,. -ACChYIE •-in-~.i~t / G-2 C O N T R A C T good So. 1099659 ExecuCed in Quadruolica[e "The P+emiam eh~r6M for thH Bond is included in that ehowo LA8OR AND MATERIALS BOND oo the Per(ormaoae Cooa" KNgI ALL MEN BY T1ESE PRESENTS: THAT Vance Co roo rat ion. 3940 Pyrite SC., R+ver&ide , di pri ACS pdI, and v, vPrr T,n ,r ~ rr,.,a„v or amPr;r, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, in the just and full amount of Fif tv Fa r 7h usand Six H nd d tiinet•: Ei ht Collar nd Fif ~ Three Cents wor s (54,698.53) for the payment whereof we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators successors and assigns, Jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Give under our hands and sealed with our seals this gch day of Fo hr~,arv . 19._9L• The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, MHERFJIS, the above-named principal is about to enter into a contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal agrees to construct Improvement of Beryl Street Between Lemon Avenue and Mandarin Court to accordance with the AGREEMENT dated 19_, as provided in said contract, which satd contract Ts hereby referred to and made a part hereof to the same extent as if the same were herein specifically set forth; NOY, THEREFORE, if the said principal or principal's subcontractors fail to pay for any materials, provisions, supplies or equipment used 1n, upon, for or about the performance of said work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, or for amoun is due under the Unempl oynrent insurance Act with respect to such work or 1dDOr, the surety will pay for the same in an amount not exceed the sum herelnaDove specified, and 1n case suit is brought G-3 CONTRACT LABOR AYD MATERIALS BOMD hereon, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court, otherwise this bond shall be void and of no effect; PROVIDED, that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to said contract, or agreement, or of any feature or item/items of performance required therein or thereunder shall 1n any manner affect the obligation of the undersigned on or under this bond; and the surety does hereby waive notice of such amendment, limitation of time for bringing action on this bond by the City, change extension of time, alteration or addt tion to said contract or agreement and of any feature or item or items of performance required herein or thereunder. This bond shall insure to the benefit of any and all persons entitled to file claims under Section 3181 of the Civii Code of the State of California, and shall give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this borwl. YITIESS our hands this 9ch day of :e4r,,,r,. 19_`. Lance Cor oration by~~~,~y ,A1P.Qi t1 a ~.itR/~ by ~ Title _ Individual Partnership Corporation ~ Other, explain 'SI6YATURES OF COIfIRACTOR MIST BE ACKMDMLE06ED BEFDRE A MRART PUBLIC. PLEASE ATTACK APPRBPIIGTE ACKNDiLE661E1IT FDR16 (IIDIYIDUAL, PART1ER511lP, CDRPORATIDM, LTC. 1. i l2 .1 ~ C N O ~ t~ ~ :~ ~I O \ ~ January 21, 1992 Laird construction 9460 Lucas Ranch Road Rancho Cucamonga, cA 91730 SUBJECT: RELEASE OF BOND - CONTRACT 87-142. ARCHIBALD AVENUE REALIGNMENT. 19TH STREET TO HIGHLAND AVENVE. WITH HIGHLAND AVENUE iM PROVEMENTS Gentlemen The City Council, at fits regular meeting of September 23, 1908, releaeed your Faithful Performance Bond in Ghe amount of 5294,442,41. Enough time has elapsed since the release of this bond and no cla ime have been aubm fitted. Therefore, your Labor and Material Bond in the amount of $294,442.41 fie now being releaeed. if you have any quest fie ns, please call me at 989-1851, Extension 2009 Sincerely, DJA:jle cc: Engines rinq Enclosed Debra J. Adams city clerk EY+ O~LII .-~~<cffFt~~ Janrr Sutton, Deputy City Clerk /i. ~. .,. .. ~ ..w.Cr„p;. _~.. m..mor, r~.,.,.., ,y. y.. . -],.~ r ~ e~MOnpger .~ .:,:-.,.n., nC~~~ f'.~o,n9 ,.._ E%FCL'TED IN THREE CO^,NTF.RP:1H T5 PRh:;i7 LT1 ISi:I CU PU IV PF:It h'-R`I:\N CF L'UA. C O N T R A C T I3und ~r}p0720A8 L A80R AND NATERIAI.S HOMO KNON ALL NEM BY 1TESE PRESENTS THAT Laird Construct inn Cu_, Inq_ _ __ __ -.. .._. _• as principal, and _Fidelicv and _D~osir, Cem~any ,.i, Mgr•:1 _nd __, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamorga, a muci r-i pal ~nr po ration, in the just and full amount of iwo Hundred Sineev Lour Th rniynnd :md Pour mind rrd Fnrcv iwu and ;i/L00 <inllnrs for the payment wherrof we hereby Dind ourselves, our heir , exe,:u to ,, admini stra tors successors and assigns, jointly and severally, fi ^n1y by these presents. Give Under our hands and Sealed with our ,cal, this _~ Aay of ^,,~, 19 gL. i The candi ti on of the fore goi n.l obl iga Linn i-. su~'~ that, MHEREAS, the above-named pn ncipal {s abUVt to enter Soto a contract with the ' City of Rancho Cucamonga whr reby saiC pri nci pa' agree; to constr uc< Archiba~.] Avenue Realignment, 19th Street to Highland with Hi1glhland Avenue Improvements ' in accordance wl th the ACa1EEMENi dated ~.v~~V:ST,_2- t _ 19 ~r1, as provided rn said contract, which said contract is ha rehy refer+eA to and made a part hereof to Lhe same ettent as if the same were herein specifi tally set forth; NOY, THEREFORE, if the sate principal or principal', •, a0t on trac tors Fail to pay for any ma terlal s, provisions, supplies n.' caul Amen: us=; rn, upon, for or about the performance of said wo ~k conirac teA to be dine, nr for any work or labor thereon of any kind, nr for amounts dae ander the Lnempl oymen t. lrsurance Act with respect to such work or' labor, the surety wall pay far t'ne same it an amount nat. exceed the ;um he rei na hove specified, am in care suit is brought G-3 a C O N T R A C T LA80R AND MATERIALS bCND hereon, a reasonable attorney's fee Lo be fixed r•y the : our t, otherwise this bond shall De void and of no effect; PROYIOED, that no amendment, cha r•ge, ex to ~s+ m if time, al to ration, pr addl Lion to said contract, nr agreement, cr of an. feat are cr Stem/i tans of performance required Lhe rein or thereunder snail ir. any manner affect the obligation of the undersigned on or ender CF's ';n r,a; and [he wre ty does hereby waive notice of such amen Area [, lime to ;i un .;f tii^e for Bringing action on [his bond by the City, change e<te nsion of tip^e, a';eratf on or ad~.:i ti on to said contract or ayememenc and of any fe ~ture or i~em ~.- items of pe rf nrmance required herein or the re•.,nder. i This Dond shall insure to the benefit cf an;•- and all ,:e rsons entitled to file i claims under Sec Lien 3181 of the Civil Code of cna S*.a to of Califo ~ni a, and Shall glue a right of action to such perscr; ~• t.Lrfr assigns to any suit brought upon this bond. ~ YITNESS our hands this ~r~~day of .~u cu r.c ^, 19 ;;; _. l.a 3rd Construe Ciao Cn. (n.;. __ Fiuel lt': and DennsrL Cum ar. of Ru=;TaESS NAraE of coNrrfn±Trtrt- . _ . _.. _ . ~-----~~.-. '~ " ,r~t na flY: _.~ _2_..__-__~.____ .~_ ~ _____ ~ ~ r_ _ ~ ______ _ ___ Diann r.n sk nwski ' Dy~T ~ ,fih71e_SE~iCEL_M'.v atcurn=y-rn-r:r~c by title Pf~l.t4?F~(. F f LAt ) ntli vi dual ,_ Par ine rship AX Corporation Other, e~pla in 'SIGNATURES OF CONTRACTOR MUST DE ACKNOM EDCfD BEFORE A NOTARY PUlIL IC. PLEASE ATTACH ADPROPR LATE ACI(NONL EDGMENT f0Rll5 (INDIVIDUAL, PARTNERSHIP, CORPORAT [OM, ETC. ). tiu ~~ '' ~'.. Ficldman. Rolapp_ & Assoui~-tcs M'iP ._-..-- ._-- __ ,. ~.;,: r:.:,:.: :;.~.:;~: ~,~.~~~;~ :~:~,-, :~~..-,u;, - -- Dcccmbcr Io. 1991 CIT}~ OF RANCHO CUCA A10NGA 10500 Civic Ccntcr Dritc Rancho Cucamonga. CA 917'9 A ttc noon: ~1r. ,ICrn B. Fu brood. Deputy C'ic.:.\fanagcr - j w~n:xm v r =m:na„ H .V.:cyxt~lc~amarx LtwwnCeG tinlapo /.'. ~ ~^ r gyn. - .. . DEG _ ?y~- ~\\ ?~-..-. ~. Rc: Addendum to Drct inus Agrccmcnt doted I. 09 88 Rancho Cow monga. ('arpn CFD 8R-I - hRA Proicct No. I'24 Dear \1r. Fulwwd: the abo~c referenced Agrccmcnt, dated Dcccmbcr 9, 1988, sDCCif ied a Fec for Phase 1 not-tn-exceed 57,500. This Addendum hereby proposes a fee incrca se for Phase Ito a no[-to-exceed amount of 510,500 to be paid to Field mnn, Rolapp 3 Associa tcs. A coDS nl the Lv`Itcr Agrccmcnt is enclosed. This increase has been necessitated by the additional work requested and epmplexiry~ of required pla na ing. If ;his .lddaldum is satisfactory to you, please take aDDropriatc action [o au thorizc its aceepla nee b signing and :etu rn ing the ;IuDlicate copy. Suttcrcl c, FI F.1, D,y,A N, ROh:U'P & ASSOCIATES CITY' OF NASCilO f..UCA AIONGA Phnmas G. 1 boon crrt B. uiwnod 6 ice Prestd nP ~ Dcpu tf ritt blo nagcr A rot ed br: ~~7(]1~n' Dcnni~ I. Stout. y1a}or /•3.,• I UJ ~m I n~lnw r.