Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992/06/03 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. June 3, 1992 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 City Councibnemhers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Councilmember Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Pamela J. Wright, Councilmember s�+ Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989 -1851 City Council Agenda PAGE Suns 3, 1992 ��( L—ul,-u i All items submitted for the City Council Agenda seat be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is Se00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Boll Call: Buquet , Alexander , Stout , Williams , and Wright E. ANNOUNCER -TUTS /PRESENTATIONS C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM T'BE PUBLIC This is the ties and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsegueut meeting. Comments am to be limited to five minutes per individual. 2s CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any it" may be removed by a councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: May 6, 1992 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 5/13/92, 5/20/92 and 5/21/92; and Payroll ending 5/7/92 for the total amount of $1,838,810.51. 3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off -Sale Beer S Wine 10 far Smart & Final, Smart S Final Stores Corporation, 8675 Base Line Road. 4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale General for 12 Smith's Food 6 Drug Center 0702, Smith'. Food 6 Drug Centers, Incorporated, northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. 5. Approval of Appointments to 'che Bilingual, Senior and lq Sports Advisory Committees. _ City Council Agenda PAGE June 3, 1992 2 6. Approval of the incremental transfer of $66,149.00 from 19 the 1990/91 phase of the multi -year Community Development Block Grant funded Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement Project to various prcgram year phases of this project. 7. Approval to get annual special tax for Community 22 Facilities District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System in the amount of $297.48 per acre). 23 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) 31 8. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 68 -2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement). RESOLUTION NO. 92 -168 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) 9. Approval of Environmental Assessment and Tentative 40 Parcel Map 13987 - Lewis Development Company - Approval of a resolution confirming the decision from the City Council hearing of May 20, 1992 to modify and approve the Conditions of Approval relating to Tentative Parcel Map 13987. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -169 41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING AND APPROVING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987 TO CREATE A 1.31 ACRE PARCEL IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AM ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNe 227- 151 -17 _ City Council Agenda PAGE June 3, 1992 3 10. Approval to execute Memorandum of Understanding (CO 92- 48 038) between the San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drugs Task Force and its Fiscal Agent, San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 11. Approval to execute a Subordination Agreement from Shih- 52 Chen Hsu for the property located at 10010 Almond Street (APN 1074- 041 -06). RESOLUTION NO. 92 -170 53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM SHIN -CHEN HSU AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME (APN 1074 - 041 -06) 12. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, 55 Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract No. 14644, located a the and of Camellia Court, north of Hillside Road, east of Beryl Street, submitted by Jorge R. Garcia, DRA Garcia & Associates. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -171 57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14644, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 92 -172 59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT NO. 14644 13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 62 5782 Haven Avenue, located on the west side of Haven Avenue eouth of Hillside Road, submitted by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Sainte. - City Council Agenda PAGE June 3, 1992 4 RESOLUTION NO. 92-173 64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 5782 HAVEN AVENUE 14. Approval of Reduction and Substitution of Securities for 65 Tract 13359, located on the east side of Sapphire Street between Orchard Street and ,Iennet Street, submitted by H.E. Heim Incorporated /Royal Conserve Corporate. Release: Contingent upon acceptance of Certificate of Deposit in the amount of $190,000.00 to be transferred to the City by Surety Company Faithful Performance Bond $166,200.00 Labor and Materials Bond $ 83,100.00 Accept: Reduced Faithful Performance Certificate of Deposit $106,900.00 Labor and Materials Certificate of Deposit $ 83,100.00 15. Approval to accept Improvements and Notice of Completion 67 for the Utility Undergrounding associated with Tract 128350 located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue north of Arrow Highway. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -174 60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12835 - UNDERGROUNDING AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE 16. Approval to accept Improvemuite, Release of Honda and 69 Notice of Completion for Tract 13304 - Base Line Road Improvements, located on the south side of Base Line Road between Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive. _ City Council Agenda PAGE .Tune 3, 1992 5 Releaee: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $326,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 32,600.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92- 17570 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13304 - BASE LINE ROAD AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE 17. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and 71 Notice of Completion for CUP 90 -40 located on the south"at corner of Jasper Street and Sierra Vista Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 32,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -176 72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 90 -40 AND AUTROLIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE Is. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and 73 Notice of Completion for CUP 91 -11, located on the east aide of Lucas Ranch Road north of 4th Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 4,360.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -177 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR COP 91 -11 AND AUTHORIZI= THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION PC% THE WORK _ City Council Agenda PAGE June 3, 1992 6 19. Approval to set a Public Hearing for July 1, 1992 - 75 Approval of Amended Parcel Map 11891, located generally at: the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Jersey Boulevard, submitted by RCDC Associated L.P., A California Limited Partnership. 76 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO APPROVE AMENDED PARCEL MAP 11891 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO E. CO elm ORDINANCES The following Ordinancer. have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second rulings are expected to be routine and von - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one tiae without discussion. The City Clerk will Mad the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02 - JACA MASI ORDINANCE NO. 696 (second reading) 78 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, PARTS A S B ELIMINATING DESIGNATED ACCESS POINTS ALONG ROCHESTER AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE, AND ADDING AN "AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE COURT" USE CONSISTING OF AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN SUBAREA 7, AND "SPECIALTY BUILDING SUPPLIES AND ROME IMPROVEMENTS" AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN SUBAREA 7, RESPECTIVELY - "Ni 229- 011 -10, 19, 21, 26, 27 AND 20 2. CONSIDERATION Or AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES TO DECLARE A D00 AS VICIOUS PAGE - City Council Agenda June 3, 1992 , ORDINANCE NO. 498 (second reading) 84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 6.04 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL DUDE PERTAINING TO POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND /OR VICIOUS DOGS 3. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 307 -B (second reading) 92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.2B OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION TO REFLECT THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE FIVE, TERMS OF TWO AND FOUR YEAR APPOINTMENTS, AND THE REMOVAL OF JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS WITH THE CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and /or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ETIWANDA SRrVjEjC PLAN 94 AMENDMENT 89 -03 - U.S. HOMES CORPORATION - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision recommending denial of a request to amend certain development standards within the Btiwanda Specific Plan. (Continued frost April 1, 1992) CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14211 94 - O.S. HOMES CORPORATION - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying the proposed tentative tract map and design review for the development of 226 single family lots on 81.2 acres of land within the Etiwanda Specific Plan in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre), located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of the Devore Freeway, and west of East Avenue - APN, 1100- 041 -09, 1100 - 081 -02, 1100- 171 -01 and 13, 1100- 181 -01, 1100 -141- 01 and 12, and 1100- 191 -01. Related Filet Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 89 -03. (Continued frost April 1, 1992) PAGE 0 city Council Agenda June 3, 1992 8 2. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 97 APPLICATION POE PROGRAM YEAR 1992/93 AND AMENDMENT TO TEE 1989/90 AND 1990/91 FINAL STATEMENTS FOR REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS - The adoption of the Final Statement of Camunity Development Objectives for Program Year 1992/93 and the final selection of projects based an a grant of $551,000.00 and $13,260.00 in program income, and related amendments to the 1989/90 and 1990/91 Final Statements to allow reprogramming of funds. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -179 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEW BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR PROGRAM YEAR 1992/93 3. CON- T- ==. -Q4 OF APPEAL OF HODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL 134 USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE - Appeal of the Planning Co®ission'• denial of a request to expand the hours of operation on Friday" for an existing 103,552 square foot indoor wholesale /retail commercial use located within the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APNt 229- 262 -20. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -180 174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91 -03, FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION ON FRIDAYS, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN, 229- 262-28 Q. PUBLIC REMINDS The following itos have no legal Publication or posting requiraownts. The Chair will open the rating to receive public testiaoaF. No Items Submitted. PAGE - City Council Agenda June 3, 1992 9 E. CITY NARAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public leati=my, although the Chair may open the maating for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF NATTERS FOR THE NOVEMBER 3 1992 177 ELECTION RESOLUTION NO. 92 -181 178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 1992, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS RRQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GRNERAL LAW CITIES, AND CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO RENEW ON SAID DATE RESOLUTION NO. 92 -182 179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE CO STS OP THE CANDIDATE'S STATEMENT FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1992 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -183 181 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE NELn IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, THE THIRD (3RD) DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1992, SUBMITTING A QUESTION TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING WHETHER THE MAYOR SHALL SERVE A POUR YEAR TERM PAGE city CStY CO Agenda June June 3, 1992 30 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -186 183 (OPTIONAL) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS MEMBERS TO FILE • WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE RESOLUTION NO. 92 -185 184 (OPTIONAL) • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS RESOLUTION NO. 92 -186 185 (OPTIONAL) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE PILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following item have base requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not. public hearing itens, although the Chair my open the Heating for public input. 1. DISCUSSION OF LIBRARY MASTER PLAN (Continued free May 186 6, 1991) 2. CONSIDERATION TO FILL VACANCY ON THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (ORAL REPORT) J. IRMIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR MIT MBSETIMO This is the ties for City Council to identify the item they wish to discuss at the next "sting. Thee item will act be discussed at this sating, only identified for the next mating. - City Council Agenda PAGE June 3, 1992 11 X. CONMONICATIONS PROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included oa the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimeny a d set the utter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURBI®YT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE 8E801ON TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL NATTERS, PROPERTY NEdOTIATIONE, AND PENDING LITIGATION WITH ROODS V. CITY OP RANCHO COGMONGA; AND BEIROSIAN V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXECUTIVE SESSION TO ADJOURN TO BUDGET WORKSHOP TO BE RELD ON DUNS 4, 1992 AT 6,00 P.N. IE THE TRI- COISBNXTIEB OONPERE(CS ROOM OP THE CIVIC CENTER I, Deora J. Mama, City Clark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 29, 1992, seventy -twn (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. May 6, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO OADmt A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was hold on Wednesday, May 6, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:11 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Diane Williams (arrived 7:20 p.m.), Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Danisls, Deputy City Manger; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Tarry Smith, Park Planning /Development Superintendent] Otto Eroutil, Deputy City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II; Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Capt. Bruce Zeiner and Lt. Mike Ingram, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. . R R • R El. Presentation of Proclamation to Rachel Bolduc for her quick action in saving her co- worker. Mayor Stout presented the proclamation to Rachel Bolduc. 82. Introduction of Rancho Cucamonga Pulice Department'a Bicycle Enforcement Team. Capt. Zeiner, Police Department, introduced the bicycle enforcement team. He also invited the community to the press conference to be held Friday, May 8, 10:00 a.m. in front of City Hall. Councilmember Williams arrived at 7:20 p.m. •RR RRR City Council Minutes May 6, 1992 Page 2 B3. Presentation to the City Council for Awards Received from the American Economic Development Council for Marketing and Promotions Excellence. Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager, presented the awards received by the City to the City Council. C. COMMUNICATIONS FRON TBE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. • f R ♦ f R Dl. Approval of Minutes: April 1, 1992 (Wright absent) April 15, 1992 (Wright absent) April 22, 1992 (Buquet, Wright absent) D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/15/92, 4/22/92, and 4/29192; and Payroll ending 4/9/92 for the total amount of $1,298,938.34. D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer 6 Wine Eating Place for China Garden Restaurant, Ri Yin Zhao, 9770 19th Street. D4. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bide" for the 1992 Tree Planting Program, to be funded from SBA Grant, Account No. 124 -4637- 6028. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "1992 TREE PLANTING PROGRAM," IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval to extend Comcaet's Cable, T.V. Franchise. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -012H A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH CONCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D6. Approval to appropriate $160,683.26 from Deferred Revenue Fund (87- 13901- 7907) to the Redemption Fund (87- 4637 -7920) to call bonds within CFD 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage District). City Council Minutes May 6, 1992 Page 3 D7. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 92 -031) between the City and Alta Loma School District for use of Deer Canyon and Carnelian Elementary Schools for summer Day Camp Programs. Agreement includes reimbursement of utility costa. Da. Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights -of -Nay at the southwest corner of Calaveraa Avenue and Ninth Street between Julia Guttero and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALTPJRNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPRO' RMENTS AND DEDICATION FROM JULIA GUTTERO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME D9. Approval to accept Lien Agreement as security for the completion of on -Site grading activity for Conditional Use Permit 90 -37 (Foothill Marketplace) , located on the South side of Foothill Boulevard between I -15 and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Foothill Marketplace Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 92-134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIEN AGREEMENT AS SECURITY FOR THE COMPLETION OF ON -SITE GRADING ACTIVITY FROM FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE SAME DID. Approval of Maps, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement securities, Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of Covenants, Condition. and Restrictions and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 4 for Tract Map Nos. 14407 and 14407 -1, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewis Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 14407 AND 14407 -1 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AGREEMENT WITH LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NO. 14407 City Council minutes May 6, 1992 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT NO. 14407 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT NO 14407 -1 D11. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12876, located on the northeast corner of 'Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Daly Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12870 D12. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13273 - Pedestrian Undercroceing, located on Milliken Avenue south of Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewis Homes, RESOLUTION NO. 92 -140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13273 - PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSINC D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13898, located on the northwest corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue, submitted by Hixrahi and Say. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13898 D 14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13930, located on Nilson Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue, submitted by Mix Development. City Council Minutes May 6, 1992 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E %TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13930 D15. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 11341 Milliken Avenue Medians, located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Mountain View Drive. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $ 58,113.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE MEDIANS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE D16. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13565 - MWD Landscape, located on the southwest corner of Crescents Way and Ridgeline Place. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $271,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 27,100.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13565 - MWD LANDSCAPE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE D17. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for MDR 88 -19, located on the south aide of Arrow Route between Red Oak street and Vincent Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $150,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 88 -19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE D18. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bond, and Notice of Completion for the Construction of Etiwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and Summit Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $222,000.00 City Council Minutes May 6, 1992 Page 6 RESOLUTION No. 92 -146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND SUMMIT AVENUE D19. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for the Improvements located on the East Side of Haven Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $144,500.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D20. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 11734, located on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 18,240.00 Maintenance Guarantee Cash Bond $ 600.00 D21. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for the Interior Tract Streets in Tract 13304, located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 10,538.00 D22. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 9192, located on the northwest corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $101,936.00 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Storm Dr) $ 67,448.00 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Block Wall) $ 53,456.00 D23. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for the Undergrounding of Utilities for Parcel Map 11030, located on the east aide of Haven Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 61,660.00 D24. Approval of Preliminary Engineer'a Report and Setting a Public Hearing for June 17, 1992 to levy the Annual Assessments and approve the Preliminary Engineer's Report for Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD -85). City Council Minutes May 6, 1992 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO, 92 -148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD -85) AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING THEREON RESOLUTION NO. 92 -149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE PARR AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD -85) D25. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting a Public Hearing for .Tune 17, 1992 to levy the Annual Assessments and Approve the Engineer's Reports for Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and S. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -150 A RESOLUTION OF T'E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 92 -151 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 D26. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting a Public Hearing for June 17, 1992, to levy the Annual Assessments and Approve the Engineer's Reports for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 RESOLUTION NO. 92-152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 35, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Minutes May 6, 1992 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'$ ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. ♦ R R ♦ R t P. CGNBaNP ORDINANCES E1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONNENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Development Districts Map as described below: 1. From Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) for the following subareas: F. For 15.33 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) - APN: 208- 291 -01 through 03, 05 through 07 and 208 - 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 25 through 27. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 494. ORDINANCE NO. 494 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 92 -01, SUBAREA F, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 15.33 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 206- 291 -01 THROUGH 03, 05 THROUGH 07 AND 208- 311 -12, 13, 15, 17, 23, AND 25 THROUGH 27 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve Ordinance No. 494. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -0 -1 (Wright abstained). Councilmember Wright stated she was abstaining because she was not present for the first reading. f R R • • • City Council Minutes May 6, 1992 Page 9 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No items were submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS NO items were submitted. • x x « w x B. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM STORMWATER PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT, SANTA ANA REGION Staff report presented by Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II. Councilmember Wright asked Mr. Dellhime where the money would come from. Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II, reported it would be from General Fund monies, but that in the future staff hoped to get the money from other sources. Councilmember Alexander inquired if Cucamonga County Water District was paying for part of this. Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II, reported they were not. Councilmember Wright felt this was explained in a technical manner and felt the staff report explained it in a manner that was easier to understand, and asked that the staff report be read as part of the record. Sigmund Dellhime, Management Analyst II, read the staff report into the record which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Jack Lam, City Manager, added this is being placed on the City by a higher government source, whereby no funding was provided to the City to comply with this. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve the agreement. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. I. COUNCIL HUSINES� I1. DISCUSSION OP LIBRARY MASTER PLAN (Continued frosi April 1, 1992) Councilmember Williams stated a letter was sent to the County per the discussion from the April 1, 1992 Council meeting, and that as of this meeting, the City has not received a letter bark from the County. she felt it was up to the Council to decide what to do. City Council Minutes May 6, 1992 Page 10 Jack Lam, City Manager, mentioned he would talk with Harry Maya on Friday at a Managers- meeting he would be attending to find out about the County's position on this matter. Mayor Stout explained about the Library tax the county collects and what it is used for. He added Rancho Cucamonga wants its cervices enhanced. ACTION: Update to came back to the Council at the June 3, 1992 meeting. Councllmember Buquet felt operational information should be developed by the City to see what it would actually cost to operate its own library. • ♦ R R ♦ f No items were identified for the next meeting. f • • • a No communications were made from the public. R 1 A • • • MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to recess the City Council until the conclusion of the Fire District meeting, at which time the Council would reconvene and adjourn to an Executive Session to discuss pending litigation, property acquisition and personnel matters. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. The Council recessed at 7:46 p.m. The Ccuncil reconvened at 8:22 p.m. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to adjourn for the Executive Session mentioned above. Notion carried unanimously, 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 8:23 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adama, CHC City Clerk Approved; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FCR PERICJ: 05 -13 -91 (91192) ....................... RUN DATE: 05/13/91 POI, 1 VENDOR ..... =. -......... ...................................... NAME ........... ........................................................................ A............ .... ............................ ITEM UFSCRIPTION WARR NO ..................................... �......... WARP. ANT. 1A CHECMA OVERLAP 6635 CALIFORNIA DEPT. CF FORtiTRY INC 20% AOMIN FEE TREE GRANT PROJECT A 65138. IT .913.01 <C< 65139 - AS 546 »> 667 VISA 4810 0058 8140 9402 0 65541. 9I6.2 1 «( 65548 - 66330 »> 61 3ANR OF A"tRICG NATIONAL TRUST AND EARLY PA1 -OFF CFO 84 -1 DAY CREEK 663310 160,683.26 <<< 66332 - 66155 »> 5703 SNOMDEN EL EL T IC, INC_ OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 89499 A 66756 118.00- «( 66757 - 66',96 ») 1826 PACTEL CELLULAR 43300131 CHUCK 8VOUET 66197. B6.11 P44 GREAT WESTERN SAVIN2S EMP. PC. DEFERRED COMP /PPE 5/3/92 66198. 6.139.00 6194 DR. JANET BALER PURCHASE OF LARK DRIVE 66799. 62,100.00 A7)4 DR. JANET BALER TAIES.CFD.PROF SERV A 66800. 2.143.15 6794 OR. JANET BALER PURCHASE OF LARK DRIVE 66801. 62. 100.0C 6794 DR. JANET PALER PURCHASE OF LARK DRIVE 66802. 2.743.25 (<( 66803 - 66804 >>> 385 ACTION SUPPLY INC. CLASS III BARRICADES LEFT C RIGHT 1 66805 1.680.91 6792 ADVANCE[ SYSTEMS TECHNDLO`.IES OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 411004 66806 90.06 6779 ALLSTATE FLMCING OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 23672 66807 159_CO 2929 AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION 7 HABITS OF HIGHLY EFFECTIVE 6680tl 9.95 2.93 AMTECH RELIABLE ELEVATOR CD. SERVICE FOP THE MONTH OF MAY 66809 315.00 6193 ARM MANAGEMENT SERVICES OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. X20864 66810 10.00 BORE ASP, KATMRTh REFUND CLASS 46032 RCT 897302 66811 35.00 .�� 6191 ASP, MISS, REFUND CLASS 46D48 PIT @97314 66812 18.00 383 AUSTIN -FCUST ASSOCIATES, INC OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 114395 66813 6.64 2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANY, INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0 66814 153.28 2551 6 L 0 SPECIALTIES. INC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 88698 66815 65_43 841 BANK OF AAtR1CA- CORPORATE SVCS RENDERED AS TRUSTEE 10 /1 -3129 66816 1.064.77 6787 BARNES. CWCH REFUND IMA7 TRIP PCT 09494 66817 36.00 379 BARRY TREE `.ARE ARBORISTS REPORT TENTATIVE TR14190 66818 1.320.00 33 BASELINE TRUE VALCc HARDWARE 8ONGEE /MIRE ROPE CLIP /ROPE 4 66819 14.55 3217 9AYLESS STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES - 4 66920 83.84 I338 BIG A ALTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 4150 A 66921 31.63 34 BOARDROOM REPOR43 I YEAR SU3SCRIPTION - JACK LAM 66822 29.95 I'S %AAOFORC. HARpIO INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT CLASS 15.41 6.9Z3 69.30 1156 BRITTON INC.. BDB MONTE VISTA STREET IMPROVEMENT PRJ. 66824 4.289.85 6782 %RUGGER'S CERTIFIED WELDING. WAGE OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 021744 66825 27_02 937 CALCUMP INC. MAINTENANCE FROM 5/1191- 5/31/92 66826 282.00 594 CALIFORNIA CASUALS T- SHIRTS FOR TEEN SPORT CHALLENGE 66027 11163.70 6788 CARR01 LAURA REFUND IMAK TRIP PIT 08414 66928 18.00 496 CHEVRON U 5 A, INC GASOLINE CHARGES 66%29 27.15 1546 COAST ELECTRIC LIGHTING SUPPLIES 66930 189.55 681 COMMUNICATION TECMNIOUeS CRIDER FAST RECHARGE BATTERY 66031 159.64 6183 CONSUMER REPORTS SUBSCRIPTION 66431 28.00 3269 CRUSH MASTER ASPHALT CONCRETE C ASPHALT LOADS 0 66833 120.00 85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER GIST 44 CU FT 66834 108.40 239 0 E A CONCRETE CO MAIN L BIKER. R.C. A 66935 695.53 284 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO. INC COURIER 12 COME PW 66836 37.17 1291 DATAV4ULT DATA STORAGE 66837 104.50 6789 DE LEON, DEDNICIA REFUND IM4% TRIP PIT 19475 66938 36.00 107 OETCO NAME YADGF. L BADGE REPAIR 66831 28.02 274 DIETZ TOWING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 1641 66840 70.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF uARRANTS rCR PERIOD! J5 -13 -92 (91/92) RON DATE: 05/13/91 PAGE: L .......................>._. 'f`_Y:L`R ........................... aa......... a........... NINE .......................... a....................... •.............................. ITEM IESCRIPTI011 PARR NO vv.... uu.... uuv ........................ a....... a. a............ a.. NARR. AMT. ............................... ** CHECK/ OVERLAP Stdi 3AV 1 LOT _ICYCLE RENEWAL 66841 16.00 6165 DOVER cLEVATCR i,MPANY OVE]P6YMENY OF BUS. LTC. 615402 66842 40.50 1301 ORAPHIA MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 66$43 94.63 523 1ISTMAN. INC OFFICE SUPPLIES A ObdH 255.30 6786 EASTWOOD 44RCE43 APARTMENTS OVE RP6INENT OF BUS. LTC. 110912 66845 5.60 6390 EDWARDS, MICFAEL PARTIAL REFUND NEIGHBORED CTR APRIL 66946 ITS. 30 459 EGGEE AO SOFTWARE CCMPUSERVS MACTNTOSM 1 66847 169.15 1258 EELLIS, JANA REIM5UFSEM£N1 FOR C.E.R.T. CL03 66849 4.26 1258 ELLIS, JANA REFRESHMENT C.E.R.T. CL $5 5119/92 66849 45.00 llb EXPIRE CO. FIREMARS FUND INS. 4MXIR0248532 66850 12.022.00 .791 EVERS. BETTY REFUND UIMAY TRIP ACT 18410 66851 I5.D0 .900 FINISHING TOUCH, THE REFRESHMENTS FOR DESIGN AWARD FROG 66852 362.42 1844 FONTANA MOTORCYCLES INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0 66853 39.61 2840 FORD OF L"LANO, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE A 66054 219.47 1082 FRANKLIN INSTITUTE MONTHLY TIES JUL 92 66955 1.70 1444 GARCIA, AMY SCOREKEEPER 18 GAMES PPE 5/3/92 66856 121.50 4829 BARMAN, JEANINE REFUND CLASS 16093 ACT 096ZB3 66857 12.00 139 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES DISPOSABLE OUST Bt ASTER II 66858 LT.S3 4654 �XIFFIN HOMES PARTNERSHIP GVERPAIMENT OF BUS. LIC. 116519 66659 I.SZO_17 4890 GRUBB C ELLIS CZAPANY OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LTC. 89127 66860 90.DO 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 9.8 -1550 1 66861 11162.79 4883 HALE COMPANY, THE OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LTC. 921630 66Ab2 23.00 4897 HANDLER. LILIAM REFUND IMAA TRIP RCT 08479 66863 18 500 NAVSD7. •SSGCIAIE S. INC. LANDSCAif STRUCTURES BIKE RACK 66864 :00 460.00 2155 HAVEN WIRE L LIQUOR CO. CATEQ"G 66865 35.80 ZS19 NECKETT SLAG PRU'CUCTS 314+ CLASS 740 BASE 66866 309.9T 4835 MENNEGIN. RUTH REFUND IMAA TRIP RCT 06412 66967 18.00 1069 HEYDE, CONALC L- INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT IN FULL CL*6303 66869 73.92 4099 HICKMAN. PAITY REFUND RID WRESTLING RCT 0007 66069 30.OD 49D2 HI661N5, RICOARG 801 REFUND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 66810 528.00 L61 NOTT LUMbER LO_. S.H. MOUSE CLUE TRAP 66071 10.72 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRJDUCTS, INC TERMINAL .TRIP 1 66872 131.46 A6 INDUSTAIIL ASPHALT HELLRIR AVE.. RANCMO CUCAMOMGA 0 66873 215.16 4903 INLAND JPRiGE MANAGERS' ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION DUES FOR 1992 66474 15.00 907 INLAND MEOIATION bO RD LANDLORD /TENANT - APRIL 1992 66b75 524.29 908 INLAND MEDIJTION BOARD FAIR HCUSIIIG - APRIL 1992 66876 742.02 9Z IbLANO VILIEY DAIL1 ."LLETIR SUB /B REEKS 6/7- 7/20/92 OSASTR PREP 66877 15.12 2317 INMAC BUDGET FLOPPY 901 66878 123.17 4686 INTERSTATE IRTERIOR SYSTEMS. iNC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS- LTC. *13606 66879 132.60 4891 JOHNSON. MICR4L REFUND CLASS *6183 RCT *95789 66%80 25.00 4089 KALPINS L.M.L.. RUTH I. OVERPAYMENT OF 805. LTC. 012207 6A86I 16.90 3417 KELLY SERVICES, INC. 40 MRS W/E 5/3/92 HELEN CANZONERI 66881 317.20 A69Z RIbUR15. MATTHEW REFUND CLASS 15321 RCT 097739 66883 40.00 1218 KNOB COWHIDE GLOVES - BRASS SHIM 1 66884 314.29 SIB "EN. MIRY MJNTMLT ORAJING -APRIL 92 RIOESHARE 6.395 20.00 1075 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY METERS AND CALIBRATION AITS 66885 240.59 40BT LARRY GEORGE EIECT91C .RC. GVERPAIMENT OF BUS. LTC. 417319 66887 10.00 179 LEWIS HCME1 REFUND DEPOSIT - PERMIT A 3138 66888 11000.00 4016 LEWIS HOMES TR 11134 MAINT eUARINTE, REFUND 66883 600.00 4886 LUNDE.V UNCSCAiF INC. OVERPAYMENT OF IDS. LTC. 12540 66990 25.00 1112 MIILSORT, INC_ WEER ENUING 473-0/91 66491 49.46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FCP PERIOD: 05 -13 -92 (91/92) ......... w w v w w......•..... a.. a .. ..............................• a.. w.. v.• w..••. w....•. .. v EHODR NAME ITEM Jfl,RIPTION WARR NO .................. a........ a.. a....= a................ a. a... ............................... 549 72 16 .901 3.15 4396 3336 4893 4584 2591 4998 b15 2:.8 3637 46 %5 3340 2212 1826 5711 5112 5128 1079 1719 2682 826 2994 28L7 65 1219 5346 5713 2213 3364 70 TO 5730 626 545 112 276 5714 315 301 2:. 32 3443 5716 2778 05 7705 5117 5 11 MARIPOSA NCk1ICLLTU6AL E4T.INC. .'RA CHRIS, INC. M 4RANAN.A4C$}NaRIrXA ryS pN.L FINu RC CALL, SUSAN Mi CALL. SISAN RE O. AIf CE YCRIT ERG. CC. MILLARET• JERRY MILLER. BS i TY ANN MINNESOTA NE STERN . MI NITL. ARE SI DI N 6 S /LCVRT KARL AUTO UNIFORM MLA. NAL UNIFORM CO., R INC. 01 AH ElUIPPENT . INC. P L O TECHNOLOGIES PACIFIC IRRIGATION SUPPLY PA CELLULAR PADILL Ir JLN!, PAUL. MICHAEL PDR PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA PONCMLUCB RHONE PRIML GE BY PM ONE PRIME SOURCE. r INC. PRINT SOURCE. THE PR UE I L JS PRUDENTIAL C SEkAL S UPRLT POLICE AND ASSOLIA TES POLICE, IROLG RANDY OU IP JLNURSE ESTnER 4 6 0 NURSERY R G HONCUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAPONGA CMAI9ER RANCHO CUCAMJNGA CHAMBER EtUIPW RANCND LUIP ENT LEASING CO. REUL "S AND RHEELS RED WING G 11 DE STORE RITZ CLHERP CENTERS RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT . OM MEAN AMiGAL 1L CONSTRUCTION LM SALAS OCLCAES SAN BERN CG SXEFIFFS SAN BERN LG SOLID WASTE HUMERI SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, INC SCAG(SOUTHf RN CALIF ASSGC OF GOYRYM SRE Mr ANNELfEY` SEEA A TREE .EkT SEAL FURNITURE L SYSTE4S INC. Sf FENCE COMPANY AHI SHANKS, ARKS. Bc tT1 90 CNECAY APOIL 1992 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT 1316 BEDROSIAN vs. R.C. FILE 6754ZK5 A REFUND CLASS 96330 RCT 697088 I.STRUCTOR PMT CLASS A 6088 REFUND IMAM TRIP ACT 49476 GAS EXFAUST SYSTEM MODIFICATION TRANSFER FROM CLO5321 TO CLA5306 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT EXPRESS MULTI -PURP BLACK /CLEAR 4 -FXA REFUND IRAY TRIP ACT 18487 COMMUNITY FACILITIES UIST A 88 -2 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -UNIT 9 642 -643 MAINTENANCE A OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 111336 CONSULTANT SERVICES RISC IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 4 6[111340133 REFUND -IMAM TRIP ACT 8431 REFUND CLASS 15321, RCT #37792 1932 PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERENCE SLIDES. DEVELOPING L PROCESSING A INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT CLASS #6355 RESET METFR 6704057 MAINZ 04150 CPU I EA ISTING TAPE SUB BUS CA005 -REG CUSTOMER STK,PM3253 96.S MEMBERSHIP DUES -J BARNES SMIRTSLPANTS -OTEN, IDAME,YNIGUEZ A RETENTION BILLING AERIALEMIPPING SV REFUND - IMAX TRIP ACJT #8481 REFUND CLISS45442, RCT 195866 CRAPE FYRTLC, 1 15 GAL PROGRESS PMC SIERRA NATURE MAY PAYMENT ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 6/1/92 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC #16511 4 SERVICE. TIRE REPAIR 0641,IODL,ERR A WORK BDOTS- ROMANDIA.STUOLET,DANIELS 2CR5 F /CANON- MINOLTA CAKERALFILY REPRO FILM L PEN SET 4 UYERPATMENT OF BUS LTC 116660 REPORT) -IMAX TRIP ACT 98475 MAY PRYMEVT A A/C 1864, SOLID WASTE 2 SETS MODEL TOO GUTTER BROOMS SCAG NEM8ERSHIP DUES 199E -93 REFUND-IMAX TRIP RET0844D 36IM ULMUS SEHP / MISC TCULS FOR ASSEMBLY OF 9000 PNL OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC #20513 RdFUNO -IMAX TRIP RCT48424 RUN DATE: 115/13/92 'il.E: t ........................................ W4NP._ GMT. ........................................ OVERLAP 66992 2r24U.39 66693 5.A6 668" 6.928.84 66fl95 25.00 66896 14.00 66893 18.00 66B98 4.183.92 66099 25.00 66900 .25.00 66901 149_50 66902 36.OG 66903 1r1T4.T2 66904 40.21 66905 383.2S 66906 63.40 66901 4,229.46 66908 377.29 66909 35.16 66910 36.00 66911 40.00 66912 59.21 66913 66.11 66914 23.76 66915 4,000.00 66916 3x009.02 66917 40.00 66918 IZS.00 66919 72.61 66920 41.700.00 66921 18.00 6692Z 18.00 66923 29.63 66924 61.833.06 66925 11000.00 66926 100.00 66927 346.19 65929 131.00 Y4929 A48.11 66930 2 %.$D 66931 451.98 66932 45.00 66933 19.00 6693. 511,036.49 66935 3.603.79 66936 133.61 66937 5,836.DO 66939 18.00 66939 344.81 66940 63.03 66941 9.00 66942 18.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FCN PERIOD: 05 -13 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 05/13/92 PA6c: A .... a. s s.. s. s s... •Y.. ........ a .............e...........a.a S.... a a.. aaaasa. ..a.s sari . +.... a s a.... s. s..... .... s.... .... NFSLP IPTIO APR . ......•• s...........•• N .. N s... s.. s.... s...... s........ .................II............ s s... • .. ANT . M A R I. s........................ .. CHECKA OVERLAP 351 SLLM SHIP. 1HC TENNIS SIGNS• 10 MIL LAM MIA ETELTS 66943 1T.T8 692 SIR SPEEGT RUBBER $T4MP- 6ICYCLE ENFORC TEAM 66944 4.54 1327 SMART C FINAL SUPPLIES FOR TEEN SPORT CHALLENGE / 66945 470.29 1701 SMORDEN KLELIRIC. INC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LTC 412159 66946 112.OU 3278 50 CALIF ECI SOH 53 30 104 0005 OI 000 5 4 6694T 1.047.14 <<< 66948 - 66950 >>> 1432 SO CALIF cCISON- -ATTN: SHEILA LUNA 54 30 114 0007 01 000 9 0 66951 4.109.x8 59T SOUTHERN DATA SYSTEMS DISK PACK FOR NINE 2200 66952 123.91 322 SPARKLETTS AC/Ml 425 000 3680/051001 66953 34.20 5719 STOP N 60 MARKET 4674 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LTC 410450 66956 16.93 5TZO SWIFT, YCLETTA REFUND -IMAA TRIP RCT46423 66955 36.00 5721 T.M.C. L. INC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIST 415T06 66956 23.40 5722 TARBELL. ANGELA PLAYSCFOOL INSTRUCTOR /AID 66957 is .Oa 5723 TAULMAN. OJNALU REFUND -IMAK TRIP RCT 19491 66958 I8 -00 5o04 TAYLOR. PAUL TUITION REIMB 6 BOOKS 66959 73.33 1151 T2CMNIC MAINT FR14TER 81000 5/X439306 66960 245.00 2730 TELECOMMUNICATIONS M6WT. CORP. TRANSFER OF CIA FRANCHISE /CABLE TV 66461 750.00 781 THOMAS. ANN REFUND C145S 45321. ACT 498328 66962 40.00 318T THRDCKMLRTCN, MIRLELA INSTRUCTOR PMT CLASS 86042 66963 72.00 <<< 66964 - 66964 >>> 341 T944S -NEST FORD TRUCK KIT MOCULA 1630 1 66965 501.40 5706 TURRET PUNCH CO. INC OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 48498 66966 6.00 t- 677 UNIVERSITY COPY SYSTEMS SERVICE CONTRACT, SURCHARGE(BLACK) 66961 180_00 �- .89 UPLAND. CITY OF 111 N GROVE AVE. Ff14092610 66968 172.10 478 WARREN G CU., CARL FILE 413222• PIPER 4 66969 2121004 113 NAME, KLE6N -LI4E CORP MISC MAINT SUPPLIES.0331433700 A 66970 871.59 1522 WE TIP 1992 NE TIP CITY MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 669TL 51250.00 5725 WEAVER• THEDA REFUND - IMAY TRIP ACT 88477 669T? 10.00 5726 WENNER CCN5TAUCTCON. JAMES OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LTC ILS019 66973 149.99 267 WESTERN ROCK CO CLASS II BASE MATERIAL • 66974 663.74 5727 NEEREHOLSE 0326, THE 6VERPA(MENT OF BUS LIC 414537 66975 22.99 345 WHITNEY MACHINERY HYO L TRANS FILTER 4 66976 142.77 2901 WOLFE. CUANE L- INSTRUCTOR C- E.R.T. CLASS 03 515192 66917 62.50 509 XEROX CURPGR<TION COPIER 1012Rc A/U974944183 1 66978 3.590.66 371 LEE WEUICAL SERVICE VARIDUS CST 010 SUPPLIES 66979 272.23 348 ZEP MANLFALTL+ -IMG COM6ANY 1 OL ZIP 50 66980 49.36 A. TOTAL L049 .650.14 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGN LIST OF WARRANTS FCR PERIUU: 05 -20-92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 05/21/92 PAGE: I .uu• .............................._............................................................... ...........................a... VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WANR. ANT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............•................................................................... ..........•.•....................• 5382 WESTERN TEYPCRARY SFRVICIS ZT31 'JNIGLOSE RE4ENCY TRAVEL 6803 CPF CONVERENCE 3364 8th AVENUE GRAPHICS 667 VISA 56T VISA 5730 RANCHO EQUIPMENT LEASING CO. 781 THDMAS, ANN 2013 CAREER TRACK 6795 ACCURATE TECHNOLOGIES 2687 ACURA JR. OSCAR 3389 KGARD, RCDNEY 6798 ALBINO. ANT" NY 3134 AKAN BROS., INC. 2906 AMERICAN THERMOPLASTIC COMPANY 24 ARBOR .NLRSERY INC. 310 ARROW TRUCK 3U DIES L EQUIP INC 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 1888 BACA, CATHERINE 3419 BALL INC'JSTRIES 2516 BARKER. JEFF 3455 BARRY, MELISSA 3227 BAYLESS STATIONERS 2517 BERRY. %INCA 1338 BIG A AUTO PARTS 1247 BLAKE PAPER CO.. INC. 3330 BORAL RESOURCES, INC. 6271 BOTTOM LINE 969 SOTO LUMBER 142 BRADFORD, HANGLO 1256 BRITTON INC.. 608 6197 BROWN, FRED 3193 BRUNICK. ALVAR.El L BATTERSBY 6601 BRUNO, SCNII 3451 BUSINESS MACHINE SECURITY 56 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE 6398 CHAMBER OF CCMMERCE 73 CITRUS MOTCRS ONTARIO, INC. 14 CITY RENTALS 2546 COAST ELECIRIC 130 CONFUTER SERVICE CO 6802 CONTINENTAL PLUMBING. INC. ** CHECRO OVERLAP OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 02063 62226. 18..24- ((( 62227 - 64649 ») CITY CCNF.- FRESNO 4/29- 5 /:. /91-AOAMS 64650* 200.00 ((< 64651 - 64880 >>I 92 CA PRESERVATION CONE RF.GISIVATON 64881* 765.00 <<< 64882 - 65522 ») FERTILIZER 65523* 109.90 CC< 65524 - 65546 JJ> 4820 0058 8140 9402 0 65547* 916.23 - <<. 65548 - 66546 »J 4820 005A 8144 1009 0 66X7* 916.23 U.. 66548 - 66926 Y)) OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 016611 0 66927 34B.19- <<+. 66928 - 66961 ») REFUND CLASS 15321. RCT 098329 66962 40.00 - <U 66963 - 6698D >11 SEMINAR LINDA. ARAGON 5/20192 66981* 49.00 «< 66982 - 66983 >>> OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. Pt$975 66984 38.40 ADULT 8.0. SCOREKEEPER PPE 5117 66985 63.25 MENS BASKETBALL OFFICIAL PPE 5117 66S86 45.00 CLASS •A• LICENSE 66961 27.00 SOLID RUBBLE DUMPS 0 66980 100.00 I• (3 -PING) VINYL BINOFR /TABS 66989 5T5.93 VARIOUS PLANTS 0 66990 215.42 T- HANDLE ASSY 46991 7.27 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN TURD 4/30 66992 3DO.00 PLAYSCHOOL INSTR AID. 15 HOURS 66993 165.3D RESCUE GRAFITTI REMOVER 66994 190.83 A- SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER 3U GAMES P 66995 324.00 EGG HUNT REC. ASST. 5.5 NOS. 4139 66996 30.25 C.M. SLLESDRD 11448117 0 66997 1.011.93 PLAYSCh00L INSTR 36 MRS. PPE 5111 66998 188.28 ENGINE STAND 0 66999 1.042.93 SUPPLIES I 57000 98.21 STATE 3/8• MAXIMUM 6T001 142.59 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL I YEAR 67002 29.95 3/4• COX PLYWOOD 67003 17.93 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT IN FULL CL09442 67004 35.64 HAVEN IMPROVEMENT AT AT L SF RR 67005 IT.550.00 REFUND CLASS 06311 RCT 198635 67006 35.00 BOUKIMG FEES 67007 109.95 REFUND CLASS 4302 RCT 01422 67008 26.00 CYLINDER LOCKS 6 KEYS 61009 18.32 STREET SIGNS 0 67010 1.294.20 MONTHLY LUNCHEON 67011 50.00 VEHICLE .MAINTENANCE UNIT IT14 A 67012 1.345.77 L.P.G. FUEL 67013 49.78 LIGHIIYG SUPPLIES 67014 1.95 APRIL MAINTENANCE OF INTERSECTIONS I 67015 3.832.50 REFUND DEPOSIT ^ERYIT 04)22 67016 500.00 «C 6701T - 67017 >11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS OCR - E.RI00: 05 -20 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 05/21/92 PALE: ... •.. •.......... ...........................•..... ....................................... a •.............. •.....•...•............. VENDOR NAME IFEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMY. ...........................................•..............................•..........•..vv.... ......••......................... Rt CHECFA OVERLAP 95 CUCAMONGA CC WATFR d15Y SERVICE CHARGE A 67018 6,831.54 Z39 0 L M CONCRETE CO EDWIN 6 9tH STREET, R.C. 61019 363.12 204 DAISY MOEEL RIBBON CO, IHC DATA CART 450 0 6TOZO 60.01 394 OATACOM SERVICE COMPANY 4AINTENANCE CONTRACT 6/1- 5/31/93 67021 1,260.00 6800 DE BONIS AND FAISION HdMES 0' /zRPAYMENT OF dUS. LIC. 414331 67022 14.50 2158 DEL MAR WIRE L PROJUCT3 CORP 15^ WHITE CABLE TIES 67023 49.96 1762 DENSON, JAMES MILEAGE REIMS RESTROON LOCKUP 5117 67024 101.92 902 DEPT. OF TRANSPC3TATION D15TPICT 08 CITY "ARE OF MAINTENANCE 67025 5,239.94 1023 OGA CONSULTANT S, INC. PLAN GAG SAN BERN DETENTION CTR 67026 1.820.23 523 EASTMAN, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES A 62027 57.58 6796 EDWARD FRAPING, MICHAEL OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 019368 67028 16.30 459 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE AFTER DARK 67029 25.86 1258 ELLIS, JANA REFRESFMENTS FOR C.E.R.T. CL 06 67030 25_00 2498 Env AMERICA BAG, ZIP LOCK 67D31 12.98 1714 EXECUTIVE PROGRAM 2 BOOKS CODE 66538 G $8030 67032 43.86 4908 FINE FEATHERED FRIENDS INC. OYERPAI.ENi OF BUS. LIC. / 20557 67033 6.04 3197 FIRE MASTER 5 Ed. ABC EXTINGUISHERS 0 57034 291.10 3377 FITE, MATHERINE C. PLAYSCY001. AIDE - PRE 5/17192 67D35 13.50 1844 FONTANA MOTORCYCLES INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 4 67036 550.38 1444 GARCIA, AMT SCOREKEEPER - FEE 5/17/92 67031 20.25 1994 GILMET, VIRGINIA PLAYSCFCOL INSTRUCTOR - PPE 5/17/92 6T038 59.64 3388 GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS. INC. MISC. TREE MAINTENANCE - LOOT 0 61039 63,078.09 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 181 -1085 4 67040 4.056.77 3021 HARRISON, PICHAEL E. ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 5/17/92 67041 50.00 .�'3I2B MAVEN PLAZA MEDICAL GROUR PREPLACENENT PHYSICAL - MICHAEL GALLON 67042 90.00 2519 ME CXEIT SLAG PRODUCTS 3/4^ CLASS TX0 BASE 67043 73.21 2069 HEYDE. GONALL L. CERT INSTRUCTOR /CLASS 64 9112/52 67044 62.50 2255 HOLT "S 'OTC ELECTRIC REBUILT 100 AMP ALTERNATOR -UNIT 634 6TD45 91.59 2922 HUNSSERGFE. ANN TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 61046 64.50 495 HTURO -SCAPE PRODUCTS. INC IRRIGATION SUPPLIES - ACCT 0 I090061 67047 98.87 4904 ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY SOCIETY DUES - JULY 92 - JUME 93 67048 135.00 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT EASE LINE RO - RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4 67049 334.30 2315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 100 JUNIPER BLUE CARPET -8 CISTUS 0 67350 186.20 4907 JADE CONSULTING OVERPAYMENF OF BUS. LIC. A 21862 67051 13.50 4910 JAY -DEE FAINT. L REPAIR SERVICE REPAIR POST L SIGN DAMAGE 67052 110.00 2607 JWP INFGRMATIDN SY..TLMS CUNTRACt SERVICE 67053 137.07 609 XLAINE, STEINER C UNGERER AMERICAN INS V.RANCHO CUCAMONGA 003 61054 1:065.45 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 0 67055 458.91 321 LANDSCAPE WEST T.Y. 5 6 T.V. T 4 6T056 80,6ZT.36 2134 LASER PERFECT IF TONER CARTRIDGES 67057 105.59 1231 LEGI -TECH SERVICES DURING APRIL 1992 61058 183.33 979 LEWIS HCFES DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT 0 5042 61059 1,000.00 4912 LOUIS REHM CCNSTRUCTION DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT 0 4915 67060 500.00 4314 LYON COMPANY, TOE WILLIAM OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LTC. A 10593 61061 23.00 4905 MACCO CONSIRLCtCRS INC. OVERPAYMEYT OF BUS. LTC. A 10394 67062 38.13 4906 MACE A /C, OTC, L REFRI.- RATION INC. GVERPAYMENT OF '.US. LTC. 4 9739 67063 73.68 2952 MAILSORT. INC. MEEK FNd I46 5/10/92 67064 81.20 549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL EYi.INC. APRIL '32 4 67065 26.565.63 72 MARK CHRIS, INC. VrHICLE .MAINTENANCE- UNIT 710 61066 48.33 76 MARKMAN,ARC2YNSXI,4ANSON.L KING SERVICES RENDERED APRIL 1392 67067 15.239.45 4909 MEYER, MARJ1 REFUND CLASS A 'IS: - BIT A 9T104 67068 25.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - LIST OF WARRANTS PER PEPTIC: 05 -20 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 05/21/92 PAG`: 3 ..........•........ a......... ................•..............................•....•uv.....••..... ..........•.............•....... VENDOR NAME ITEM UESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ....... v•.... u••.•....u•u.....................•...............•... u......•.......•........• ... .................a•............ A. TOTAL _ 336.734.70 .1 CHECK' OVERLAP 1919 MOYER PkGOCCIS MAINTENANCE SUPPLTFS • 67069 290.19 4911 MONDAY, KAYE 500 SRI- 11X17 -60 GALAXY GOLD 61070 16.90 87S 11 3 `_ /LOWRY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST. 1 88 -2 1 67071 2.456.20 2246 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1 67072 259.34 4451 NATIONAL RECREATION E PARK ASSOC. RENEWAL 67073 30.00 3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICF UNIFORP SERVICES 1 67074 373.35 122. ORAN3E COUNTY SfRIPINS SVC, INC. ANNUAL CONTRACT - VARIOUS LOCATIONS 67075 3.634.00 235 OPEN ELECTRIC S.C. PULL BOXES A 67076 753.22 5243 P.F.S. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 822527 6TOT7 35.16 5731 PACIFIC WESTERN DOOR OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 4475 67078 77-67 818 PARAGON BUILCING PRODUCIS INC. PORTLAND CPT IL PALLET DEPOSIT 67019 270.46 3463 PEREZ, MARIA E. TUITION REIMB FOR P.E. EXAM REVIEW 6708D 425.00 2487 PHGENIX GRCUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS CITATICNS -APRIL 1992 67081 4.4.50 1079 PHOTO MOOSE CF CALIFORNIA PHOTO PRINTING C PROCESSING 1 67082 41.03 542 PIP PRINTING ART IN THE PARA POSTER 61063 10.43 5 72 9 PLAZA TRAVEL OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 89963 67084 330.62 65 PRUDENTIAL CYERALL SUPPLY MAT 46. MOP 4250, DUST CLOTH IA30 4 67085 96.32 714 RAM BUSINESS SYSTEMS 10000 COPIES 67066 175.00 5730 RANCHO ECUIPPENT LEASING CO- OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 116611 67087 17.57 3343 RANCHO MOBILE MCYES ScAVICE COMPLETION BILLING -HELEN MEIER 1 67U88 61009.00 3456 RIGANO.A -I.A L ASSOCIATES, PAUL REFUND OF APPLI FEES CUP92- 12 -PLNNG 61089 2.704.80 112 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS USS INSTA PRINT 645412.80.11 67099 31.43 276 RIVERSICE BLUEPRINT BLUELINL PRINTS, SETUP, STAPLING 1 67091 16.31 1732 ROSS FINANCIAL OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 49614 67092 37.00 5233 J ROWELL. SUIETTE CLASS REFUNO 96061r RCY891944 67093 25.00 3457 RUSSO-PEREYRA, JO LYNNE STENCILS CURBSIDE RECYCLING 67094 33.44 905 SAFETY FLECN CORP A/C AT 172 01 6330 1 4 67095 623.74 <<< 67096 - 67096 >>> 2536 SALAIZ. MARE ANN PETTY CASH 4 67097 531.93 261 SAN BERN CC PRINTING 6 MAIL SVC MAP SERVICES FOR APRIL 1992 67090 21.70 300 SAN BERN CO RECORDER LIEN REMOVAL FOR APM1076- 401-49 67099 8.00 301 SAN BERN CO SHE -RIFFS WORK RELEASE PAUL OROCO-S INC) INJRY 6T100 20.00 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY 6ROOM CO. INC 1 SET MUDEL TOO GUTTER BROOMS 67101 66.81 5738 SIENNA VISTA BAPTIST CHURCH DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT /5219 67102 1.000.00 3279 SO CALIF ECISON i3 30 105 0617 01 000 2 1 6T103 493.87 317 SO CALIF ECISJN CO. 43 30 C30 6501 CI A 67104 73.740.90 A. TOTAL _ 336.734.70 C I OF RANCHO CUCAMONIGA LIST OF WARRANTS FCR PERIOD: 05 -21-92 091/92) RUN DATE: 05/21/92 o4;H 1 .............. •............v v.a ......... a a. •........a... ......... ............................. ..•.•.................•......... VEVDOA NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR. AMT. ......... .......................... a............................ vv.................... •............................... a........ 44 CHECR1 OVERLAP 317 SO CALIF ECISOx CO. 13 30 030 6SO1 BL 5 6T104 13.740.NO- C« 51105 - 67140 »> 2436 CANCIAO. AATHY PLAYSCFOOL INSTR AID PRE 5/1T 61141 400.00 949 CLARK. KAREN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT IN FULL CLM6005 67142 198.00 3026 COROURA. ALCC A.S000ER FIELD SUPERVISOR PPE 5117 1 67143 116.50 2650 DEL.ADO, J_51UA ADULT 8.6. SCOREKEEPER EEL 5117 61144 63.25 2034 ESPOS iTO, LHWIIIINA PLAYSCHOOL INSTR AID PPE 5 /l7 67145 220.40 3152 HARRISON. FIC4AFL N. ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL /PPE 4/17/91 6T146 100.00 3441 HEAVYSICE. PETE ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL /PPE 5/17/92 67147 50.00 3458 HEIN, PAT INST AFT IN FULL CLASS 4 6311 67148 69.30 3020 HESSE, JOE VOLLEYEALL OFFICIAL /PPE 5/IT/92 67149 75_00 3.08 HINSON. IE LT. REC. ASST. - PPE 5f1T192 61150 332.75 631 HOLMES, SHEILA PLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR /PPE 5/17/92 67151 492.00 3459 HEBRAIC, BETH AIDE SLB - PPE 5/17/92 67152 9.00 3022 JOHNSON. VIVIAN PLAYSCPOCL AIDE /INSTR-PPE 5/1T/92 67153 263.54 3396 KELSET, ROGER ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL-PPE 5 /lT /92 67154 100.00 3112 <ING, ANGELA Pt4YSCHODL AIDE / PRE 5/XT/92 61155 72.00 2171 KITCHEN. JAY ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL /PPE 5117192 67156 325.00 2399 KLJSMAN. CSRCL PLAYSCHOOL AIDE / PRE 51ll/92 6T157 03.68 3460 LE VALLEY, WENDY PLAYSCNODL SUB AIDE / PPE 5117/92 67158 10.00 3262 LEE, MICHAEL SOCCER OFFICIAL - PPE 5/17/92 61159 75.00 2773 Li VESAT. CHUCK 86 6 V4 GYM SUPERVISOR /PPE 5117/92 61160 130.00 292 LCVUE. SALE CLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR /PPE 5/IT/92 67161 312.00 3023 LUNT. BREN7 A. 4OULT BB OFFICIAL - PRE 5/17/92 67162 90.00 2830 LYNCH, BWCK BASKETBALL OFFICIAL - PRE 5/17192 67163 90.00 3169 MAODERN, OARLEME M. PLAYSCMOOL AIOF - PPE 5/17/92 61164 7200 . ]2Z MA GAVLANFS. LINDA INSTRUCTOR PHI tN FULL CLASS 4 54D0 61165 200 50 1361 MATCHAM, SHAWN ART IN THE PARK - PPE 5117192 6T 166 77.00 2199 MC AROSE. TRACT SOCCER FIELD SUPFRVS'SOR /PPE 5/17192 67167 36.00 2415 MEYER. CHARLIE 8.8. SCOREKEEPER - PPE 5/17/92 67168 57.50 2548 NIGRO, ANOREE- PLAYSCYOOL INSTRUCTOR /PPE 5/17/92 4 67169 318.80 2686 OSBORN, BilH SOFT9ALL SCOREKEEPER -PPE 5/11192 67170 108.00 3401 PELTIER, KEVIN OFF -SITE REC ASST -PPE 5/17/92 67171 189.15 2805 9E NOER4P APH. RONALD L.B. OFFICIAL - PRE 51l1192 67112 90.00 6013 PETERSON, 6RIA. ART 1.4 THE PARK - PPE 5/17/92 4 67t73 169.50 2850 PORTER, DENNIS REC. ASSISTANT - PPE 5117192 61174 255.75 2842 RAMOS. NICOLE LIONS CTR REC ASST. / ARE 511T/92 67115 89.59 2632 REYES, ANNE SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER - PPE 5/17/92 67116 108.00 3037 SCIORTINO. NICJLAS G. SOCCER OFFLEI4L - P., 5111/92. 67177 175.00 535 SEMPLE. JULY SENIOR FITNESS INST. / PPE 5/17/92 611T8 87.00 )IT 50 CALIF ECISDY CO. 43 30 030 6501 01 1 67I79 64.953.16 317 SO CALIF EDISON CO. LITE INSTAL PUCHSTP /N:.HLH06630-4254 67180. 6.797.64 <<< 61181 - 67183 »> 1432 SO CALIF ECISON- -47TN: SHEILA LUNA 53 39 105 1560 02 000 B 0 67 184 3.132.56 319 SO CALIF 545 C3. 05 3169 239 1706 2 1 67185 2780 STEPHENS, HOGSTCN 6.B. UFFICIAL - PPE 5117/92 67106 90.00 5164 STOOOARC, LIZ CLASS REFUND 4"11, 9CTY980S6 61187 2.00 2669 SWANSON. EL& ART IN THE PARK - PPE 511/192 67188 126.50 3461 TRRBELLr ANGELA ANG PLAYSCH OOL RIDE SU9 /PPE 5/19/92 67189 36.00 3036 TRIMBLE, SUCCPR 'OFFICIAL - PPE 5111192 67190 50.00 3409 TPIMBL Er LtlPINA A7RIN AEC. ASST. - PoE S111191 67191 34 i.tlN CITY OF RANCRC CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS ECR °FR[D0: OS -Zi -92 (91/92) 64 TOTAL 19.545.66 RAIN DATE: 05/21/92 PEG,: t e•v...+• . . . . . . . . 9FNDUR ..uu...uu . . . . . . . . . . . . . u vuv. aaa a....—.... NAME .......................... ...............uv................. ..............ovo... MV.......-..... A.... (TEM IESCRIPTI4N WARR u u u u.............................. ..............................•.... NO MARK. 4M7. ................ A* CHECK$ OVERLAP 5731 TSENG. FRIEOE R. PARTIAL REFUND OF APPLI- CUP92 -12 6T 192 195.20 1113 TURNER, E.STMF2 REINS FJR PEP DAY TROPHY A 61193 216.19 5121 TUMSKY. JAREC CLASS REFUND 95321, RCT190329 67194 40.00 2958 U-PS ARE US ASSOCIATI14 UMP SVC 5116- 6/30/92 6T195 1.309.00 553 UWISTRUT LDS AICELES MAN04L ORIY^ CAP MODEL 9TL222 1 67196 344.95 5135 UNITED AEROSPACE INOUSTWI "ES 6VERPaY4ENT OF BUS LIC 111075 67197 649.99 5101 UNITED MODEL UISTR18UTORS OVERP4YMF4T BUS LIC 112521 6T198 373.01 426 UNITED PACIFIC CORPORATION WALK :TN BARK A 67199 1.950.DO 1054 UNITED TITLE COMPANY 80NO PAYOFF REFUND APN 1076- 401 -49 67200 202.91 689 UPLAND LOCK AND SAFE OUR FORT SAFE KEYS 61201 1.27 3283 UVA, STEVE SOCCER FIELD SUPERVISOR /PPE 5/11/92 67202 109.00 5736 VAN FLEET, SUTANNE CLASS REFUND 16034, RCT1986T5 67203 35.00 3556 VAN VALKENdLRGa, SUSAN PLAYSCMOOL INSTRUCTOR -P:E 5117/92 8 672D4 142.T6 474 VFRMEER-CALIFDWNIA CAP 6 TANK A54D 61205 17.42 <<< 6T206 - 67206 »> 667 VISA 4620 0051 8161 1203 9 67207 1.690.62 1103 VISTA PAINT AURA GLIOE BASE. BRICK MATCH. FRAHEI 67200 238.74 213 WAXIE. KLEEM -LINE CORP MISC MAINT SOPPLIESI /CA331433100 8 67209 569.30 637 WEST ENO UNIFORMS SLIM JIM 67ZLO 34.10 A77 WEST PURLISWIN6 CO C4 RLS CT -STDPO 9201 8 61211 31.52 374 ESTERN EXTERMINATOR A/U676555 -4 9 67112 213.00 S382 WESTERN TEMP3RARY SERVICES OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LID 82063 67213 184.24 5048 WESTERN TILE A40 TOPS INC. OVERP.1 -ENT OF BUS LIC 113739 67214 17.60 345 WHITNEY MACHINERY HYDRAULIC CYLINDER -9646 4 67215 334.85 509 XEROX CCRRCRATION 1090 DLPL 9698684172 67216 509.42 2098 ZAGORIN, XEITM TENNl, COURT SUPERVISOR /PPE 5/17192 67217 46.15 5737 74INFELC. JACOB CLASS RE'UNO 16041. ROT 096144 61218 12.00 3110 LANILA, DX4! ADULT e.M_ OFFICIAL.' PPE 5111/92 67219 135.00 348 ZEP MANLFACTLRINS COMPANY ZE_P •0 6722D 46.05 64 TOTAL 19.545.66 MAY 1 s GELD CO• • p � ANJJµr..11 Y4. W Net F/•In IEwe rYr SNe-In rley^nrM1n OM aMI W EEE*EE IM MCONOEK RR11gAW INRNTRl1) I. DepnlMnl of A olvolir Beve,ope ConeW IMm IAOodwy S.cto Barber. Far 50000veo, CoA1, 9551¢ ¢fveemlde I r l ie,'fa ,...... ;...�.,,a.; I, TYFE151 OF IICENSE(5) FILE HO. riff -Set¢ Beer 6 Woo I Applied older 5n. ¢EW r [] Eff mva Don; R`CEIFT NO. 604696 GZOGRAWI LODE 3312-01 Dan reel 2 NAME(S) OF AFRKANT(S) f q. Mvmll Ho ERnRre Dore. Smart n Ffnal Stares Carporetion _ 3, TYPES) OF TRANSACTIONS) FEE LK. TYFE LOOS Stoat 'Irene far (26071,1) S 100.00 20 u A 1. NOM el 6ni. $WCt .1nat "r ) oAlog I u J. I of f M,rinn- -Numbe, ad So. 9675 Beeeliee ¢d. Cihad Zip Cede Cewry r ncno co.,on._4121a— _6,5eiDnedim_ \ j TOTM S 100,0 __. 6. If be-Ho tiOenred, F. A. bemire. tn" _ SM. Trpr of Lion-• Type 10 __ Gh Limm? Ls IT. Mail, AM,. (if dif rnnl 0. S) -Nun Wr and Street P..p rro.l 9 Hove You eve, bwn ram[nd a a f el 10. How You ern eioloW uoy of Fie poelriaaF of tM Alcobdic .l r Revamps Cemrol Aa or 11.66— of the Dap .o, per No loino, to The AA? No 11. Rpble O'TES" omwr n ov., 9 or 1n en on enarhmra which -hall be deemed pe I of 1MF ciMlik fen. i w 12. A,Ll Lim ORwn In1 lhar any — ivHHE- —&,of in on vole Lcanwd Memnn will To- all dre gwlif aiom OI a &ee a an e, d 1 (b) lb., he will nor —W. or anon ar We, R To be vinlmed any of the prerhnn, of five Al-Wia U-1.1e Cw11o1 40 13 STATE OF CAUFORNIA� C.,O, of .._.... Zoe_Ing lu _ ! IS 93 �Y+, wvNn • • v w r u.nr w ..v. -1 n.er J m...o.n. ;v .-.. ,w ..nnn .r.rn...e+ h - „ee.. -, p .,a. ;n. err•N..; n ,4 ;....n. e nrn n r v 11 NT SIGNER SIGN HERE T .... _ ! � Lone d 1 Alvarado APPLICATION BY TPANSRgOt 15. STATE Of LAIWOMNIA cowry of....... ! AR.A 91i1RdL. ___...__.DoA...._...dLUM- -_____ hn se •nln en �ww.IW •n••N.r•n rerN •n evwev- MnN ,M nn•F.• vA.o MNolWile&I. TAFL GOq For FirpaNmrnl U. tErff, V~ Dietrf t Mdil notify AHUMd (�(Rnordvf m1kr, rfid iiwy Repery _ ............... .......... .. -COMES MA6ED __..__",..' _......_.__.... .......... . ......... m•x-e, ❑Rerre.el: Fee el „$3t ;OO pedm .�:rsmmlf o__.,_.._...016.. on.,.. — Rocitip o BASELINE l u l l 1-T-F-H-� SMART & FINAL APN 207 - 022 -24 13675 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 A business within the Sunrize Center at the SWC Baseline /Carnelian Property currently zoned: Neiqhbornood Corvnercial Zoninq of Adjacent Properties: North: Low Residential South: Medium Residential East: Office /Professional West: Vacant /Flood Control District sasse (IR /Q9 Ct I.. wwe. -a.w.. r AaMKArIW1 #GA ASCCf1OEM: NSYYA9S MUMS) 1. TYMSI Of IICENSCj51 tiff To: Deyarmml OF AkvWk r . C." McE rt No. 5998)] IPoI b•od•W r.a ft" for Se<rmrm, C.Gi. 95SIt 1rlr.r.ld. Off Sal. Gen.1.5 Giaawq l ..n.:......:w.w . w.. Cdlf 3615 TM aM«.gn.d FaMy aqJ <br � Ivwd I.mw<dev:Md w Idb.a ArRlkd wre.. s<. }.O<, g }, NAME(S) Of AP?t A (SI T.mp, Fam;1 Foad 6 Dsul Castes Ix, Ntedi» D 5 -8 -93 Ea.,. Dore: ' J -,3 •ry 21- 355816 3. TYPE(S) OF TSANSACTIOMS) FEE lK. iYf! 3 Ycp xt 3.o Mnurdlno G.000.00 31 MAY 1? u['o f 19ror mat, for ,99, W<.1 t #51)16 4 54 a. rw.3vt #575.31 .r"new 8O&L[\.a rmd S Drar Coma • #]02 5, lawbn d #e0non -Nwnha cm, SMa R/V corwr of FOOrhill s 15agard Annual Is. 446.49 31 tia1111MOMlallf ONNOxfb CM and LR CeG Cway -- S BapChLS 9V30 9Y S.mardlaa R.Lnc. Do. TOTAI 446.00 SM. iyq .f lkmw r. A:. rv.nn.» In1bo ryL' 1• S. Malirq Ad . (il dRawr I»nl S/ -Naebw aM 36M •.yr.,m.; 1<m <. _� •_mil <am coy? r • 1df0 e. Ne...w mr bwn abd d a l.bnrT I/A. 100 . Nwe sm .•a ndol.d odd:. .1 m< d Mo ooc W. S.»ru9. Comm! 1N a r.aelelle» el the Dep.mn.nl W. dwq bdw A.11 Y i,. E.pla;n v "YES" m..a 1. R o 9 a 10 m Do samhmom whl<6 droN M d»m.d pal OF Mi. epcR<cac, 12 Applk.m .m.w (el Na am mempr .mpby.d k m wl. Ik-unf p.;..01 h.m ell am q.elM<.Mnr Of . ;,mn w, .M 1 rhol M .11 ml • ola. a <ww a puma b M ri OW m] d Me pbKdm. d M Ak.M1di< Iwa.9e C I Ao. 13 STATE ..O.i r 1Y � cw ry et. � nJYC�_n k4c_____. `- -.�_. q Z ACaLW L re District 5-8-92 _ .-.- A. �.. � �.•wm... . •w.�ur rw•u -.� w.:r� u .r. • u w • rti ...r r N ::..rr.:n..... ..ww..,. r r• <:.... ' :..... r w:w.r'. n w,... w.:... + N .w...... ".. ~:. :�: -.<� ....... n• w i< HERE Sl rt • 9U �N ^A M0 Trar SIGN NfllE 1_______ _ �_ __. :� �. •.N 'I w EIVED AMkXjkV0V 'I�+(A1i' Et N 11.E E Of CALIFORNIA Cvonry N_. -. - . -.._.. ~_`•_ P! _, -, _ +�/'° 1 ate• L�•.M6 �, w �� <n. w�a.. a n• w I..: "��R.�� n . r e....:..i....• ...a:.. w n«.I...':.. »..�sr. wr.:'rw"�....<...... «+.:. M Not WNte M. Mir Line; For Oeparcbml U. Ehdp Anahed: r; faadod :writ, �/_ .> ❑ .----- ..--- .._ ------------- -............... -- .._.._ron[s ❑ b». vl: Md----------- Md M ----- - --- ----- - -- --- _.-- - -011k m-- '- ------ ---- --ll »eiM Ne. ..-..--------------- a r.:.:.. T . nm Currently Zoned: Community Commercial in Subarea 2 of the Foothill Specific Plan Zoning of Adjacent Properties: North: Medium Residential in Subarea 2 of the Foothill Specific Plan South: Community Commercial in Subarea 2 ��•- of the Foothill Specific Plan -,` East: Special Commercial in Subarea 2 / \ of the Foothill Specific Plan West: Office in Subarea 2 of the Foothill Specific Plan -- SMITH'S FOOD R DRUG LC_C�L114 �� CENTERS, INC. Sini th's Food & Drug, NWC FOOTHILL R VINEYARD!' �a 9'� .- Centers, Inc. I ':. ;qPN 207- 102 -20 s, Foothill Blvd. it - - -'' -�- - - --- --�� rQ a LI FOOTHILL_ BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I3 sasse 05/19/92 BACKGROUND: During the months of March and April, 1992, commissioners from the Perk and Recreation Commission interviewed applicants for the bilingual, senior and sports advisory committees. The Commission took action on May 20th at their regular meeting to recommend approval to the City Council that the following individuals be appointment to their respective committees. It was felt that the individuals recommended would be willing and able to provide sound ideas and input on issues regarding bilingual, senior and sports concerns for the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Bilinaual Advisory Committee: Sophie Flores - currently a member of the committee. Has expressed a strong desire to assist /work with the city's bilingual community. Bernice Flynn - Lives in the Old Town area and has expressed a desire to work with the bilingual community. Alma McGuire - Currently a member of the Committee. Lives in the Old Town area and is very active in the community. Alicia Mangin - Currently a member of the Committee. Has expressed an interest in helping with activities for the bilingual community, Alice Kedrano - Currently a member of the committee. Has expressed a desire to serve the community. CPI'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT '- DATE: June 3, 1992 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: 11`I Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager /Acting Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II �2 SUBJECT: Appointments - Bilingual, Senior and Sports Advisory Committees RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the following citizens to serve on the respective advisory committee as recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission at its May 20, 1992 meeting. Terms of appointment would commence July 1, 1992 and conclude June 30, 1993. BACKGROUND: During the months of March and April, 1992, commissioners from the Perk and Recreation Commission interviewed applicants for the bilingual, senior and sports advisory committees. The Commission took action on May 20th at their regular meeting to recommend approval to the City Council that the following individuals be appointment to their respective committees. It was felt that the individuals recommended would be willing and able to provide sound ideas and input on issues regarding bilingual, senior and sports concerns for the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Bilinaual Advisory Committee: Sophie Flores - currently a member of the committee. Has expressed a strong desire to assist /work with the city's bilingual community. Bernice Flynn - Lives in the Old Town area and has expressed a desire to work with the bilingual community. Alma McGuire - Currently a member of the Committee. Lives in the Old Town area and is very active in the community. Alicia Mangin - Currently a member of the Committee. Has expressed an interest in helping with activities for the bilingual community, Alice Kedrano - Currently a member of the committee. Has expressed a desire to serve the community. Advisory Committee Appointments June 3, 1992 Page 2 Tess Rodriquez - Currently on the committee. Has expressed an interest in finding ways to serve and improve the bilingual /hispanic community within Rancho Cucamonga. vivian Ruff - Currently on the committee. Has expressed desire to continue serving the community by bringing all residents of Rancho Cucamonga together through worthwhile functions. Senior Advisory Committee: Thomas Baillie - currently on the Committee. As a senior himself, Mr. Baillie has stated that he feels he should be invovled. Wilma Brenner - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed a continuing interest to promote programs in the best interest of the seniors. David Dominguez - Currently on the Committee. Has indicated that he would like to continue his tenure on the Committee to ensure that goals and ideas are carried out. Also, being a non - senior Mr. Dominguez has stated that he feels he can bring "an outsiders view" and insight. into the needs and opportunities for seniors in the community. Dorothy Henson - Currently on the Committee. Being a senior herself, Ms. Henson has expressed an interest and understanding of senior problems and concerns. Esther Humphries - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed a desire to be involved in the community. Has had experience with Los Angeles County Park and Recreation. Betty Linker - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed a desire to be active and participate in senior activities. Also wants to have some input into senior issues. Nancy McCormick - Currently on the Committee. Is interested in senior issues and city activities. Mabel Mercer - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed a desire to work with seniors; is aware of needs of seniors since she herself is a senior citizen. fS Advisory Committee Appointment June 3, 1992 Page 3 Grace Parker - Has expressed an interest in serving her community. Is concerned with the welfare of all citizens. Kathy Peters - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed an interest in outreach services for the community. Feels this Committee might help. Joyce Ryther - Currently on the Committee. Has expressed a desire to be of service to the community. Enjoys people and working with them. Also enjoys volunteer service. Arnold Steenburg - Currently on the Committee. Likes volunteering and is very interested in the welfare of the community. Edna Steenburg - Currently on the Committee. Also likes volunteering and is interested in the welfare of the community. Elmer Steeve - Has expressed an interest in seniors and the part they play in community life. Wilma Steeve - Has expressed an interest in helping all seniors and in improving our community. Elbert Wilkerson - Has expressed a concern about what happens in and for seniors in the community. Feels that this committee is an avenue to help seniors. Snorts Advisory Committee: Bob Olari - Currently on the Committee. Alta Loma Little League board designee. Paul Getchy - Currently on the Committee. Pony Colt Little League President. Howard Young - Currently on the Committee. President of ACE T -Ball. Jean Lombardo - Currently on the Committee. President of American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO). Bill Walcolm - Currently on the Committee. President of R.C. Softball. 1�O Advisory Committee Appointment June 3, 1992 Page 4 Paul Moore - Currently on the Committee. President of R.C. American Legion (baseball). Paul Finkleman - Currently on the Committee. President of Alta Loma American Legion (baseball). John Ruckolls - Currently on the Committee. Board designee of Pop Warner Football. Dan Rosso - Currently on the Committee. President of Vineyard Little League. Carmen Angelo - Currently on the Committee. President of R.C. Spirits (girls fast pitch softball). Priao Morales - Currently on the Committee. President of Rancho Little League. Ginny Venzor - Currently on the Committee. President of Citrus Little League. Joe Albers - Currently on the Committee. President of ACE Youth Softball. Terry Thomas - Currently on the Committee. Board designee of CYSA (club soccer). Eric Jay Sieber - Currently on the Committee. Board designee of Deer Canyon Little League. Jerre Llyod - At -Large Community Member. Active user of existing sport facilities in Rancho Cucamonga and other southern California communities. Has expressed a commitment to both youth and adult sports activities not only because of the recreational and educational value of sports, but also as an alternative to other more negative ways in which idle time gets used (drinking, drugs, gangs, etc.). Calvin Ruff - At -Large Community Member. Has expressed an interest in sports and feels he could represent the opinion of an average citizen without ties to a particular sport organization. Advisory Committee Appointments June 3, 1992 Page 5 Sandy Spetnagel - At -Large Community Member. Feels she can make a positive impact on the way youth sport programs interact with the City. Has expressed a need to be proactive to ensure success of programs. David Vize - At -Large Community Member. Has expressed an interest in promoting healthy activities that will benefit the citizens of our community, especially youth. Has strong background in organized sports in other California communities. Lastly, it is recommended that the term of appointment for the Bilingual, Senior and Sports Advisory Committees run from July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993. This change will allow recruitment to occur mid -year rather than at the end of the calendar year during the holiday season as it was previously scheduled. Respectfully submitted, Jsrry Fulwood Deputy City Manager Acting Community Services Director 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT _n.... June 3, 1992 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lan, AICP, City Manager ?RCM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner /CDBG Coordinator SOn_J6CT: TRANSFER OF FUNDS COMMUTY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM - The incremental transfer of $66,149 from the 1990-91 phase of the multi -year Comma pity Development Block Grant funded Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement Project to various program year phases of this project. RECOP94 DATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve, by minute action., the transfer of funds in the total amount of $66,149 from the 1990 -91 Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement Project to various program years as follows: 54,226 to the 1967 -88 phase: $22,320 to the 1988 -89 phase; 530,500 to the 1989 -90 phase; and $9,103 to the 1991 -92 phase. ABSTRACT The malortty of the transfers 'nave already occurred by incremental process over the last 1 1/2 years. however, with additional transfers required to onplete the 1989 -90 program year project, the total amount of funds to be transferred from the 1990 -91 program year will exceed 25 percent of the originally approved amount (the actual amount is 28 percent) and therefore, requires an amendment to that years' Final Statement and in turn, the Final Statements of the other affected program years. ANALYSIS The street improvements to .Sierra Madre from Arrow Route to 9th Street, funded through ^,he 1989-90 CDBG Program, were originally estimated to require :,250,000 to complete. In the following year, upon further analysts, the cost estimates for this project were reduced. As a result, to May of 1!90, $80,400 from the 1989 -90 program year ( Acrount No. 28- 4333 -99511 was transferred out to complete the 1988 -89 (Account No. 28- 4333 -8811) Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement Project, lvavinq $169,600 for the 1989 -90 project. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG - TRANSFER OF FUNDS June 3, 1992 Page 2 _t -'as been estimated that additional funds will be rea_uired in this fiscal year to complete the Sierra Madre Street project. Therefore, it -s recommended that $30,500 be transferred from the 1990 -91 Southwest Cucamonga Street project (Account Na. 29- 4333 -9025) to the 1989 -90 Southwest Cucamonga Street project (Account No. 28 -4333- 8951). This transfer of $30,500 will result in a total of $66,149 in .'ands which ha-.-e been transferred from the 1990 -91 project year to other project years leaving a remaining balance of $127,101 for the 1990 -91 program year. The total allocated to the Sierra Madre Street project after transfers will be $219,600. A. noted in the Abstract section of this report, previous funds transferred included: $26,546 to close out accounts No. 28- 4333 -6811, No. 97041 and No. 8812 and $9,103 which was transferred to account No. 28 -4333 -9044 for the design of Calaveras Street from 9th Street to Chaffey Alley. CITIZEN PMrICIPATION The City's Citizen Participation Plan for the CDBG Program requires that, prior to approving any change to the allocation of CDBG funds that would add, delete, or change any CDBG project or funding allocation by 25 percent or more, the public be notif.ed and provided an opportunity to comment on the change. A public notice was published in the Inland V211ey Daily Bu Llet in newspaper. Upon consideration of the proposed transfer of funds by the City Council under the Consent Calendar, the Citizen's Participation requirements will be met. 'ne /sP ly subm ed, F / Brad let City Planner BB:CN:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Southwest Cucamonga Area Map PR C!ry� TRUCTION UCOV'''ET ED I ir G Q 1 IN GRESS W u C03 1 i � SALINA AVE t 1 z 1 • ' 1 North 0 90-91 C 91 -92 --- AREAQUALIFYING FOR CDBG FUNDS NEEDED STREET I,MPROVEMENTS t.......�....^� IMPROVEMENT AUTHORIZED FOR 1987 -1988 IWROVEMENTAUTHORIZED FOR 1988 -1989 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION 0000 IMPROVEMENT AUTHORIZED FOR 1989 -1990 IMPROVEMENT AUTHORIZED Au• FOR 1990-1991 IMPROVEMENT AUTHORIZED FOR 1991 -1992 D - DESIGN AUTHORIZED ONLY C- CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED ONLY ITEM: ZA TITLE: _ EXHIBIT: -A—SCALE: _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 3, 1992 C T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL, SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) IN THE AMOUNT OF $297.48 PER ACRE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council levy a special tax of $297.48 per acre by approving the attached Resolution that establishes the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System), which reflects a decrease of $52.52 from the Fiscal Year 1991/92 rates. ' 1 LU1 In 1984 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 84 -1, authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $20,225,000. Bonds were issued in August of 1985 in the amount of $18,000,000 to finance the construction of the Day Creek Channel. In 1986, the area between Milliken, Rochester, Highland and the northerly city limits was annexed into the district. Construction began on Phase I during fiscal year 1987 /88. Phases II and IIIA construction have also been completed. Phase ITIB construction is currently being completed. The maximum rate for the special tax was set at $550 per acre when the district was formed. However, since fiscal year 1985/86, the rate has been $350 per acre with additional funding being contributed by the Redevelopment Agency. On April 1, 1992, . City Council approved Resolution No. 92 -079 authorizing issuance of 1992 refunding special tax bonds for this district. The down -turn in the economy had pushed the interest rates low enough to equate to savings for the property owners. These savings have allowed staff to decrease the special tax rate from $350 per acre to $297.48 per acre for fiscal year 1992/93. Respe tfully submitted, / f Jim Hart Administrative Services Director Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A' Yearly Status Report 22 RESOLUTION NO. qI -/(�-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency'), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 ", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System) (hereinafter referred to as the 'District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of' a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next Fiscal Year. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SFCTI N 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 19$1• -92 q3 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A ". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is nor in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; and B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; and C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax ", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A ". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. L� Resolution No. Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of June, 1992. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: Wright Dennis L. Stout, Mayor 25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACHdTIES DISTRICT NO. 94 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) EXHIBIT 'W The Community Facilities District has been divided into two zones: ZONE 'A': General areas to be served by the drainage facilities, exclusive of Zone "B ". 2. ZONE "B ": A limited area, being only partially served by drainage facilities. Zone "B ": consists of those properties bounded on the south by FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, on the East by ROCHESTER AVENUE, on the North by BASELINE ROAD, and on the West by MILLIKEN AVENUE. The rate, method and formula for the levy of the special tax for the respective zones. being Zone "A" and zone "B ", is as follows, based upon an estimated bond amount of $16,530.000 payable over a period of twenty (14) years. ZONE "A ": $297.48 PER ACRE. ZONE'B ": $297.48 PER ACRE FOR 190 ACRES. For the purpose of defining the maximum special Tax. "ACRE" shall mean acres contained in the area of the parcel as determined using the acres as shown on the latest San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO -ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM YEARLY STATUS REPORT JUNE 1992 BACKGROUND On June 26. 1984, the electors within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System) authorised the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $20,225,000. In August 1985 bonds in the amount of $18.000.000 were issued to finance the construction and installation of public capital drainage facilities to serve and provide drainage protection to all properties located within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System). In March of 1986 the area bounded on the west by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the northerly City limits, on the east by Rochester Avenue and on the south by Highland Avenue was annexed into the district. The first annual special tax rate of $350 per acre was set by City Council in Fiscal Year 1985 /86. This rate has never been increased in the ensuing fiscal years. However, on May 5, 1992, the City conducted a refunding of this district. Bonds were issued for $16,530,000.00 to cover the remaining debt. The savings from this refunding were passed on to the residents and decreased the special annual tax from $350 per acre to $297.48 per acre. Under the Loan and Pledge Agreement the Redevelopment Agency contributes sufficient funds each fiscal year, that when combined with the special tax meet the requirements of the annual debt service payment. During fiscal year 1987/88 construction of Phase 1 improvement began and was completed in 1988/89. Construction of Phases II and IIIA has also been completed. Construction of Phase IIIB is currently being completed. The construction contract is administered by the County of San Bernardino, FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 The current rate of $297.48 per acre for fiscal year 1992/93 along with the Redevelopment Agency contribution of $918,830 will provide sufficient funding to pay debt service in the amount of $1.777,103. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $1.777.103 ADMINISTRATION & OVERHEAD $ 93.646 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS L 80.166 $1.950.915 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 30,000 SPECIAL TAX $1,002,085 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY $ 918.83 $1,950.915 $297.45 PER ACRE Note: In fiscal year 1993194, prior year delinquent special taxes received will be included as a SOURCE. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $ STAFF REPORT _ DATE: June 3, 1992 699 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council.•' $ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager'.. - FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director 420 BN Ingrid Blair, G.I.S. /Special Districts Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached Resolution establishing the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 88 -2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement). There is no increase from the current tax rate for developed properties for Fiscal Year 91/92 rates. There is however, a decrease in the undeveloped tax rate from $1,725 an acre to $1,344 an acre. Special Tax A - Drainage Facilities Residential Class I (3590+ S.F.) $ 944 Residential Class 11 (3077 -3589 S.F.) $ 699 Residential Class I11 (2564 -3076 S.F.) $ 524 Residential Class IV (2308 -2563 S.F.) $ 420 Residential Class V (2051 -2307 S.F.) $ 349 Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) $ 245 Undeveloped Property $1,344 /acre Special Tax B - law Enforcement Residential Class 1 (3590 + S.F) $113.28 Residential Class II (3077 -3587 S.F.) $ 50.65 Residential Class 111 (2564 -3076 S.F.) $ 50.40 Residential Class IV (2308 -2563 S.F.) $ 40.32 Residential Class V (2051 -2307 S.F.) $ 33.60 Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) $ 23.52 BA�KGROUNDJANALY I8 On June 21, 1989, City Council approved the formation of Community Facilities District No. 88 -2 for Drainage Capital Facilities and Law Enforcement services and authorized the annual levy of special taxes to finance only the drainage facilities, police operations and maintenance costs. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT C.F.D. 88 -2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) June 3, 1992 Page 2 The special tax being levied annually for the drainage facilities are in special Tax A - drainage Facilities. These taxes are being used to reimburse The Caryn Company for facilities constructed per the Purchase/ Financing Agreement (CO 89 -111) approved by City Council on June 21, 1989. This action will lower the bond indebtedness when the bonds are finally issued. The levy of special taxes annually for the police protection services are listed in Special Tax B - law Enforcement. These taxes will be used to cover the services provided by the police in this area. Staff is not recommending any increase in the tax rate for Fiscal Year 1992/93. Respe tfully sub ' led, Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:IB:jmf Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A' Map 32 RESOLUTION NO. �J- «� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88 -2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency "), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 ", being Chapter 2.5 , Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement) (hereinafter referred to as the 'District "); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct, ACTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax 10to he collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year 4'9.— 9 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A ". 'ECTION ;J; That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. 33 Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; and B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; and C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax ", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A ". SUTIQN 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report. showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. 3y Resolution No. Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this ___ day of June, 1992. AYES: Alexander, Ruquet, Stout, Williams NOES: None A13SENT: Wright 35 Dennis L. Stout, Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 EXHIBIT "A„ The Resolution establishing the amoral special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 1992/93. SPECIAL TAX "A'- DRAINAGE FACILITIES PROPERTY CATEGORIES There are two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A ", which are identified as follows: 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessors•'s parcel for which properly a building penult has been issued as of May 31 of any year. 2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All other property. excluding property which, as of the date of the election to authorize the Icvy of Spectal Tax "A:, is: (it owned by a public entity: (it) owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for transmission or distribution purposes: or (W) zoned as open space. TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL TAIL "A' RATES The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the authorized Special Tax "A" rates for Fiscal Year 1991/92 are as follows: Taxinc Classiflca Ion Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class 1 $944 per year (More than 3.590 square feet of dwelling unit living area) B. Residential 11 $699 per year (3.077 -3.569 square feet of dwelling unit living area) C. Residential III $524 per year 12.564 -3.076 square feet of dwelling unit living areal - D. Residential Class IV $420 peryezr (2,308 -2.563 square feel of dwelling unit living area) Taxng C1assJicatton 11. Residential Class V 12,051 -2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) F. Residential Class VI (Less than 2.051 square feet of dwelling unit living areal • G. Commercial or industrial property 2. UNDEVEWPED PROPERTY All Undeveloped Property Tax Rate $349 per year $245 per year $2.030 per acre per year `• $1,344 per acre per year •" The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living space, exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the building permit(s) issued for the dwelling unit. The acreage of a commercial or industrial property shall mean the gross acreage exclusive of anv acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. •" The acreage of an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. N THOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPF.CW. TAX "A" Special Tax 'A" shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above identified Properly Categories so long as Special Tax "A" revenues are necessary to pay authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District related to the financing of authorized public facilities, which may include, without limitation. payment of debt service on any bonded indebtedness of the Community Facilities District: replenishment of any required reserve fund for any such bonded indebtedness: funding of any required sinking fund necessary to pay for future public facilities or debt service: or direct payment for public facilities (CFD Expenses'). The annual levy of Special Tax "A" shall be apportioned as follows: STEP 1: The Community Facilities District shall estimate the amount of CFD Expenses which must be paid for from Special Tax "A" revenues collected during the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax "A" levy Is to be established (the "Required Special 'fax "A" Revenue''), STEP 2: That equal percentage of the Special Tax "A" rate, not to exceed 91% of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate, applicable to all Developed Property Taxing C lassifica l ions necessary to generate Special Tax "A" revenue in the Fiscal Year of the levy equal to the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue for such Fiscal Year shat; be levied nn all Developed Property, STEP 3: If additional Special Tax "A' revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Undeveloped Property necessary to generate such additional Special 'Pax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Undeveloped Property. STEP 4: if additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that equal percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 5: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, the Community Facilities District shall: A. Compare (I) the Special Tax "A" rate which would be levied on each Developed Property combining STEP 2 and STEP 4 above with (11) the product resulting from multiplying the square footage of the Developed Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax "A ". The Rase Maximum Special Tax "A" means an amount equal to $0.054 per square fool of the lot or parcel. B. If the product described in (it) above exceeds the Special Tax "A" rate described in (I) above for any Developed Property, the Community Facilities District shall increase the Special Tax "A" rate levied on each such Developed Property In equal percentages up to the rate not to cxceed the product described In (it) above necessary to generate the additional Special Tax "A" revenues to equal the Required Special Tax "A" Revenues. SPECIAL TAX 'B' - LAW ENFORCEMENT Ali Developed Properly shall be subject to the levy or Special Tax "B ". The authorized Special Tax "B" rates for Fiscal Year 1991 -1992 are as follows: Taxing sifl ClasAmu L DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class 1 $113.28 per year (More than 3,590 square feel of dwelling unit living areal ' B. Residential Class 11 $50.65 per year 13.077 -3.589 square feet of dwelling unit living areal ' C. Residential Class Ill 550.40 per year (2,564 -3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living area) ' D. Residential Class IV $40.32 per year (2,308 - 2.563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) ' F;. Residential Class V $33.60 per year (2.051.2,-;07 square feet of dwelling unit living area) ' F. Residential Class VI 8123.52 per year (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) G. Commercial or industrial property $1,000 per acre per year 04 PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA y n • +en.. vw 2-Tv/ • vie ne uc. / ]}; }� •�., .p Sep SCALE 1* = 600' LELCUq_ '- 'il'e.��r� � auo .• nw pry rL ie. .Tl •vyrcf�r ,v rvx. vvnw ',.311'. T.xleertY:1F •r lu,qu_Af epWS��ueAgLj l.11 Y UV KAIM,tlli UUU'ANIUiNUA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 3, 1992 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council V Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: 'William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION CONFI41ING THE DECISION FROM THE CITY COUNCIL HEARING OF MAY 20, 1992 TO MODIFY AND APPROVE THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATING TO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council modify the conditions and approve Tentative Parcel Map 13987 through the adoption of the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND/ANILLYSIS On May 20, 1992, the City Council conducted a public hearing on an appeal of the Conditions of Approval for the above referenced project. After receiving all testimony regarding the conditions, the City Council voted to modify the Conditions of Approval and directed staff to prepare a Resolution. A Resolution of approval reflecting these modifications is attached for City Council review and approval. Respectfully submitteQ- \v C� .J William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BK:dlw Attachment: Resolution of Approval 4o RESOLUTION NO. 9J_ / (Qq A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING AND APPROVING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987 TO CREATE A 1.31 ACRE PARCEL IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE AND MAKING FINDING IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227 - 151 -17 Recitals. (i) Lewis Development Company has filed an application for approval of Tentative Parcel Map 13987 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map is referred to as "the application." Ill) On December 17, 1991, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to receive written and oral testimony on the proposed Application. Said public hearing was continued to January 8, 1992. (iii) On January 8, 1992, the Planning Commission received additional public testimony on said Application and continued said Application for an indefinite time period. (iv) On April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92 -62 thereby conditionally approving said Application. (v) The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was timely appealed to this Council. Resolution: NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and concurs with the issuance of the Negative Declaration issued on April 8, 1992. qI CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. PM 13987 - LEWIS DEV CO June 3, 1992 Page 2 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced May 20, 1992 hearing, including written staff reports, the minutes of the above- referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 92 -62, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue with a street frontaae of 250 feet along Base Line Road and 174 feet along Rochester Avenue. The parcel is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north and east are zoned for and being developed with single - family residences. The property to the south and west are zoned for multi - family units and are vacant; and (c) The Application creates a single parcel of 1.31 acres; and (d) The requirements of Planning Commission Resolution Number 92 -62, remain to be important and necessary to the development of the property, except for the following modifications: (1) Engineering Condition Number 2 shall be revised to require the construction of Rochester Avenue full width from Base Line Road to Ironwood Avenue with a transition as determined by the City Engineer; and, (2) Engineering Condition Number 5 shall be deleted; and, (3) A condition shall be added as Engineering Condition Number 9 that the developer enter into an agreement and poet securities to construct Rochester Avenue and the Master Planned Stomn Drain in conformance with the Terra Vista Implementation Policies within 2 years of occupancy of the proposed development or prior to the construction of the traffic signal at the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Church Street, whichever occurs first. (e) The development as specified will not contradict the goals or objectives of the General Plan or the Terra Vista Community Plan and would not promote a detrimental condition to the persons or properties in the Immediate vicinity of the subject site. 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The application is consistent with the General Plan and Terra Vista Community Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and Li 1- CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. PM 13987 - LEWIS DEV CO June 3, 1992 Page 3 (b) The design or Improvements of The Application is consistent with the General Plan and the Terra Vista Community Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (c) The proposed project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or avoidable injury to humans or wildlife or their habitat; and (d) The proposed project is not likely to cause serious health problems; and health problems; and (e) The proposed project is not likely to cause serious 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the Tentative Parcel Map subject to all of the Conditions set forth to Planning Commission Resolution No. 92 -62 (a copy of which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "A ") with the specific exceptions as follows: (a) Engineering Conditions Number 2 to read: Acquire necessary right of way and construct Rochester Avenue full width from Base Line Road to Ironwood Street including a transition of the public improvements as determined by the City Engineer. (b) Engineering Condition Number 5 shall be deleted; and, (c) A condition shall be added as Number 9 and shall read as follows: An agreement with appropriate securities shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, prior to final parcel map approval, to guarantee the construction of street and storm drain improvements in accordance with the Terra Vista Community Implementation Policies within 2 years of occupancy of the proposed development or prior to the construction of the traffic signals at the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Church Street, whichever occurs first. 6. This Council hereby provides notice to Lewis Development Company that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought 1s governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 43 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. PM 13987 - LEWIS DEY CO June 3, 1992 Page 4 directed to: 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return- receipt requested, to Lewis Development Company at the address identified in City records. Resolution. 8, The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this 4H RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF ...E PLANNING COMMISSION 0. -HE C17Y OF P.A.9CHO- CUCAMONGA,v CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY` APFRCVTNG TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13987, LOCATED AT THE SOUTSaIST CORINER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING PINOINGS IN SUPPORT Th ^cREOP - APN: 227 - 151-17 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number .3987, submitted by Lewis Development company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 1 parcel, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Calitornia, identified as APH�s) 227- 151 -17, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue; and WHEREAS, on December 11, and continued to December 17, 1991, January 9, 1992, and April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission held duly advertised Public hearings for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS SECTION i That the following findings have boon made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting properties. SEC ^.ION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Envirommental Quality Act of 1970; and further, this commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Nap Number 13987 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: Overhead Utilities a. Base Line Road - An in-lieu fee as a contribution to the previously undergrounded Utilities (electrical and telecommunication) on the opposite side of Base Lino shall be paid to EXHIBIT "A" a.;:::c::c �;n. .. _-N.. P.A. 13957 - ,:S ✓° -v. Co. April 8, 1392 Page 2 the city prior to issuance of building permits or final nap approval, whichever occurs first. It.. fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Rochester Averue to the went project boundary. b. Rochester Avenue - An in -lieu fee as corcribution to the future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities (electrical and telecommunication, except for 66 K.V. electrical) on the opposite side of Rochester Avenue shall be paid to the city prior to issuance of a building permit or final map approval, whichever occurs first. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Base Line Road to the south project boundary. Acquire necessary right -of -way and construct Rochester Avenue full width from Base Line Road to Church Street. offeite sidewalk and street trees may be deferred until the development of the adjacent properties. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of constructing offeite street improvements from future development as it occurs. 3. Remove and replace portion of the curb and gutter on Base Line Road to construct a right turn lane for the project driveway. 4. Construct a combination bus bay and right turn lane on Rochester Avenue north of the project driveway. 5. construct the portion of the Terra Vista Community Master Planned Storm Drain System 16 (lines 6 and 6 -1) from this site to Day creek Channel. If the project is to be constructed prior to the completion of the Day creek Channel, provide a retention facility to the eatlefaction of the City Engineer. 6. The Terra Vista Community entry monument, if constructed, shall be maintained by the developer. Install the Bane Line Road median landscaping from Milliken Avenue to Rochester Avenue. 91 Final Parcel Map lot lines shall conform to the approved site plan. ?LP NNT NG CC�MISSI OD °. SOL'JT:ON 9G. ... -._ TEIJT. P.H. 13987 - ..d IS CEV. CO. April 8, 1992 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST: SrA Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLST0Y, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA ASSENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 3, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager BY: Sandra G. Ramirez, Resource Services Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE GANGS & DRUGS TASK FORCE AND ITS FISCAL AGENT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS, AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMONGA Staff recommends City Council's approval to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drugs Task Force and its Fiscal Agent, San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This Memorandum of Understanding agreement is for the use of office space at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall for the San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drugs Task Force Project Assistant. City staff has been working with the San Bernardino Countywide Gangs and Drugs Task Force Project Supervisor exploring the possibility of providing an office space at City Hall to be utilized by the Project Assistant, The Project Assistant will work closely with a number of municipalities, agencies, organizations and individuals in the West End to coordinate and facilitate anti- gang and drug efforts within the West End communities. It is essential that an office be maintained in the West End to encourage a proactive process of community awareness and training. The City would provide a desk, chair and access to phone services. Reimbursement will be made to the City for toll, long distance and Fax telephone calls. Respectfully submitted, 'Jerry B. Fulwood Deputy City Manager JBF:SR:de Attachment y MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE GANGS & DRUGS TASK FORCE M40 ITS FISCAL AGENT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Regarding the use of office space at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall for the Project Assistant from the San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drugs Task Force Whereas, the San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drugs Task Force (hereinafter referred to as 'GDTF') has authorized the San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools (Superintendent), to lead the Communities in Partnership for Substance Abuse to facilitate the planning for a proactive process of community awareness, needs assessment, and training that will empower local citizens with skills, knowledge, abilities, and identifiable resources to initiate a coordinated effort of aggressive outreach to reduce substance abuse trends among the youth and young adults in their communities; and Whereas. GDTF has received a grant from the Office of Substance Abuse Prevention, and has delegated, grant administration, including fiscal, administrative and personnel policies to the San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools, also a member of the GDTF. Through this grant a Project Assistant will be hired to coordinate and facilitate anti -gang and drug efforts in the communities of Rancho Cucamonga. Ontario, Upland, Chino, Montclair and Chino Hills (referred to as "the West End "): and Whereas, this Project Assistant will be required to work closely with a myriad of groups, organizations and individuais in the West End, and will need to maintain an office in the West End; and Whereas, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as "City ") will provide office space to be used by GDTF. The parties agree as follows The term of this Agreement shall be for the period beginning on June 3, 1992, and ending on June 3, 1993 , unless terminated earlier. This Agreement may be terminated by either party without cause upon thirty (30) days written notice. The City agrees to provide the following for the use of the Project Assistant during the term of this Agreement: a. Office space within City facilities b. Desk and chair C. Access to a trunk line for phone service d. Access to FAX and answering service for after hours e. An itemized cost estimate for each of the above listed unkind services provided to GDTF `l 9 3. GDTF agrees to provide the following for the use of the Project Assistant during the term hereof: Office supplies (pens, pencils, paper, incidentals) Computer supplies (paper, labels, forms, etc.) Reimbursement to City for toll, long distance and Fax telephone calls 4. The Project Assistant will occupy the provided office space Monday through Thursday between 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., and 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.: and Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., unless arrangements to change are approved by the City Manager. 5 The Project Assistant will adhere to policies and procedures observed by City staff, and will maintain a respectful, positive and productive demeanor at all times. If any City policy conflicts with GDTF or Superintendent's policy, such conflict will be brought to the Project Supervisor and Deputy City Manager's attention. 6. The Project Supervisor, Michael Stevens, will meet monthly with Jerry B. Fulwood to assess the arrangement and need for modification. 7. City shall defend, Indemnify and hold Superintendent, its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any and all liability, loss expense (including reasonable attorneys' fees), or claims for injury or damages arising out of the performance of this Agreement but only in proportion to and to the extent such liability, loss, expense, attorneys' fees, or claims for injury or damages caused by a result from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the City's staff or employees. 8. The San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drugs Task Force and Superintendent of Schools shall defend, indemnity and hold Superintendent, its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any and all liability, loss expense (including reasonable attorneys' fees), or claims for injury or damages arising out of the performance of this Agreement but only in proportion to and to the extent such liability, loss, expense, attorneys' fees, or claims for injury or damages caused by a .result from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the City's staff or employees. 9. The San Bernardino Countywide Gangs & Drug: Task Force and Superintendent of Schools shall defend, indemnify and hold the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, staff or employees harmless from and against any and all liability, loss expense (including reasonable attorneys fees), or claims for injury or damages arising out of the performance of this Agreement but only in proportion to and to the extent such liability. loss, expense, attorneys' fees, or claims for injury or damages caused by a result from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of Superintendent, its officers, agents and employees. Sb 10.. This agreement may be amended or modified at any time by mutual written consent of both parties. The amendments or modifications shall be signed and become part of this agreement. County Superintendent of Schools Representative City of Rancho Cucamonga 51 Date Date RECOWENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Subordination Agreement requested by Shih -Chen Hsu. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the street improvements fronting the property was approved by the City Council and recorded on October 29, 1981. The homewoner is currently attempting to secure refinancing for the property. Her lender requires that this City lien be subordinated in favor of the new loan. A similar subordination agreement for her current loan was approved by the City Council and recorded on August 1, 1989. Respectfully submi William J. O'Neil L/ City Engineer WJO:SM:jh Attachment CITY OF P.ANCII0 CI'CANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 3, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM SHIH -CHEN HSU FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10010 ALMOND STREET (APN 1074- 1 I 041 -06) RECOWENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Subordination Agreement requested by Shih -Chen Hsu. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the street improvements fronting the property was approved by the City Council and recorded on October 29, 1981. The homewoner is currently attempting to secure refinancing for the property. Her lender requires that this City lien be subordinated in favor of the new loan. A similar subordination agreement for her current loan was approved by the City Council and recorded on August 1, 1989. Respectfully submi William J. O'Neil L/ City Engineer WJO:SM:jh Attachment aESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM SHIN -CHEN HSU AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WN 1074 - 041 -06) WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of off -site improvements including curb, gutter and pavement was approved by City Council and recorded in San Bernardino County on October 29, 1981, Instrument No. 81- 239269; and WHEREAS, for the developer to secure refinancing for the project, the lender requires that the above - mentioned lien agreement be subordinated to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordination Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said same are hereby approved and the Mayor Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City Clerk attest thereto. 53 by the City Council of the City of Subordination Agreement be and the is hereby authorized to sign said City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 5 l La CITY OF RANCHO CLCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 3, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 14644, LOCATED AT THE END OF CAMELLIA COURT, NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, EAST OF BERYL STREET, SUBMITTED BY JORGE R. GARCIA, DBA GARCIA 8 ASSSOCIATES, It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 14644, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. Tract No. 14644, located at the end of Camellia Court, North of Hillside Road, East of Beryl Street in the very low residential district, was approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 1990, for the division of 4.5 acres into an B custom lot subdivision. The Developer, Jorge R. Garcia, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $85,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $42,500.00 Monumentatfon (cash deposit) 2,800.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 14644 JUNE 3, 1992 PAGE 2 Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. & R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submi,�fA d, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO: PV:jh Attachments SLO RESOLUTION NO. L)j.I -7' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14644, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 14644, submitted by Jorge R. Garcia, and consisting of 8 lots located at the end of Camellia Court, North of Hillside Road, East of Beryl Street, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on September 12, 1990, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14644 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Jorge R. Garcia as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14644 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. S� 517E _ ,A+RARI -_Y LLSICE RCAO N VICINITY MAP t i 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA .r Y.T.S. TR 14644 EXHIBIT "B" RESOLUTION NO. q - 17J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT NO. 14644 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 ", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District "); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report ". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including LfieTevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. M1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 N.T.S. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r TR 14644 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "A EXHIBIT °8' PROJECT NAME: TRACT 14644 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 8 D,U. NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 8 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PV:6/3/92 �t No. of Lam s to be Annexed District No. I--- - -- - -- - -- --- 2 4 --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Name Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea. 1 Camellia Court 0 0 22 PV:6/3/92 �t U11 Y UN KA.N':IiU l;L UA.NlU�NIsA STAFF REPORT >r DATE: June 3, 1992 r� TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council 41J� Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II " T -. SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E %TENSION FOR 5782 HAVEN AVENUE, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for 5782 Haven Avenue were approved by the City Council on May 2, 1991, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $17,700 Labor and Material Bond: $ 8,850 The developer, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. The Developer has sent the project out to bid, and expects to start construction within the next two months. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Nei� 61 a 6 City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachments RONALD S ISHII AND ASSOCIATES architects planners 506 W. Graham Avenue, Suite 206 Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (714) 674 -7829 FAX: (714) 674 -9242 April 28, 1992 Steve Gilliland Public Works Inspector CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '.0500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Improvement Extension Agreement / Project; #504 - 6254 -03, Alta Loma Institute Project, 5782 N. Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Steve, We are requesting an extension to the improvements agreement that will expire on May 1, 1992. Our solicit to bid package on this project was sent to the Owner's representative on 26th of June 1991. On the 15th of April 1992 we received a phone call from the Church's educational department instructing us to proceed with the project. Apparently the approval letter for this project was misplaced or misdirected. It is our intent to proceed with the project and we anticipate the scheduling of the pre - bid meeting to take place within the next two weeks. Should you need additional information please do not hesitate to contact us Sincerely, Ronald S. Ishii President RS /ec MAYO 7 1992 cc: Frank Bradshaw Rod Burtenshaw, area architect Ralph Swiss, director CES physical facilities ;I r. l0 3 RESOLUTION NO. ��,, 73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 5782 HAVEN AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 3, 1992, by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Haven Avenue south of Hillside Road; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said 5782 Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 4L{ --- ('1'fS (m HAN('HO CL'CASION(;A STAFF REPORT DATE: Jung 3, 1992 TC: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, ATOP, City Manager FROM: 'dill jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUEJ ET; APPROVAL OF REDUCTION AND SUBSTITUTION OF SECURITIES FOR TRACT 13359, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET BETWEEN ORCHARD STREET AND JENNET STREET, SUBMITTED BY H. K. HEIM, INCORPORATED/ ROYAL CONSERVE CORPORATE RECOtT1ENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 13359 have been substantially completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council approve a performance surety reduction in the amount of $59,300, release the existing Performance and Labor Material Bonds (Bond No. 977049S) and accept a Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Surety in the form of a Certificate of Deposit in the amount of 8190,000.00. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Tract 13351 - located on the east side of Sapphire Street between Orchard Street and Jennet Street. The developer has completed the required improvements 4n an arreotable manner except for the restoration of existing parkways and private property located at the northeast and northwest corners of Cameo and Thoroughbred where storm drains structures were installed; The final grading of the storm drain easement west of Turk, south of Stork School; correction of damage to the community trail along southern tract boundary caused by storm waters; correction of damage to Sapphire Streei pavement caused by storm damage; and minor cleaning, restoration and corrective work. The developer is anxious to complete the remaining work but does not have the required funds to do so. The surety company currently holds $190,000.00 Certificate of Deposit, as collateral for five bonds; grading, water performance and labor and materials, and street improvement performance and labor and materjal. The surety company and the developer have agreed to transfer the 5190,000.00 Certificate of Deposit to the City upon release of the five bonds. The developer has been working with Cucamonga County 'dater District and City Building and Safety for the release of the water and grading bonds. �o S CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 13354 JUNE 3, 1992 PAGE 2 Once the City has control of the Certificate of Deposit, the City can release and disburse a portion of the Certificate of Deposit funds as needed to insure acceota'"e completion of the remaining work. The deveioper has agreed to the City releasing the Certificate of Deposit in the form of joint checks to insure payment of remaining work to be performed. At this point, the City must hold a surety in the amount of $83,100.00 for Labor and Material and a surety in the amount $16,620.00 for maintenance. Therefore, $90,280.00 remains for performance surety ($190,000 less $83,100.00 and $16,620.00). Staff estimates the remaining work to be less than $50,000.00, which is approximately half of the remaining Certificate of Deposit amount available for insuring performance. If this recommendation is approved by the City Council, staff will recommend at a future regular Council meeting, that City Council release specific amounts of the Certificate of Deposit to be paid jointly to the developer and his Contractors upon acceptance of the various items of work by the City Engineer and receipt by the City of appropriate release forms from the Contractors. Upon completion of all work, staff will recommend acceptance of the improvements, filing of a "Notice of Completion ", and release of remaining Certificate of Deposit funds except for 10% Maintenance Surety and Labor and Material Surety for which the developer has the right to post bond and receive all remaining Certificate of Deposit funds. Staff believes the above to be the most efficient method of insuring an expeditious resolution to this situation and therefore is recommending City Council approval. DEVELOPER: H. K. Heim, Incorporated /Royal Conserve Corporate 500 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 1210 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Accept: Reduced Faithful Performance Certificate of Deposit $106,900. Labor and Materials Certificate of Deposit $ 83,100. Release: Contingent upon acceptance of Certificate of Deposit in the amount of $190,000 to be transferred to the City by the surety company. Faithful Performance Bond $155,200. Labor and Materials Bond $ 83,100. Respectfully submitted, ' i W i111am J. O'Neil City Engineer 0610:MP: j!; CI17 OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA STAFF REPORT r- DATE: June 3, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer �- BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works inspector SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT 12835, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE NORTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY The required utility undergrounding improvements for Tract 12835 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. The Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond were originally submitted as one, in the amount of $100,000. Since the Subdivision Map Act requires the City to hold the Labor and Materials Bond for a period of six months after the ac- eptance of the improvements, it is being recommended that Council authorize the City Clerk to hold the $100,000 bond for six months from this date of approval and not release anything at this time. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Tract 12835 - located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue north of Arrow Highway DEVELOPER: Park Vineyard Joint Venture 22632 Golden Springs Road, Suite 270 Diamond_ Bar, CA 91765 Respectfully submitted, C)T �-) Za William J. O'Neio City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12835 - UNDERGROUNDING AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12835 - Undergrounding have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; end WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R016 CITY 01 RANCHO CUCAb10NC,A STAFF REPORT DATE: June 3, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ll-Jl Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II —`, k SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 13304 - BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 13304 - Base Line Road have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $32,600, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $326,000. DACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Tract 13304 - Base Line Road Improvements - located on the south side of Base Line Road between Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Road Accept: Release: DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91785 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 32,600 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $326,000 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Nei�j City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment RESOLUTION N0. � ,), I 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13304 - BASE LINE ROAD AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13304 - Base Line Road have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ID CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 3, 1992 n r -� TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II `y SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR CUP 90 -40 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF JASPER STREET AND SIERRA VISTA STREET RECOMENDATION: The required street improvements for CUP 90 -40 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $32,000.00. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS CUP 90 -40 - located on the Southwest corner of Jasper Street and Sierra Vista Street Release: DEVELOPER: Sierra Vista Baptist Church 7192 Jasper Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $32,000.00 Respectfully submitted, C'ar'e William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:Iy Attachment RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 90 -an AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 90 -40 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 7� 1 �- CITY OF RANCHO CLICANI0NGA STAFF REPORT �J DATE: June 3, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, ATOP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR CUP 91 -11, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LUCAS RANCH ROAD NORTH OF 4TH STREET RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for CUP 91 -11 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Band in the amount of $4,360. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS CUP 91 -11 - located on the east side of Lucas Ranch Road north of 4th Street Release: DEVELOPER: James d Patricia Manhire 1905 O'Malley Way Upland, CA 91786 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $4,360 Respectfully subn{i- i`ted, 9 ze William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment -13 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 91 -11 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 91 -11 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 1`1 ('IT)' OF RANC110 CCC'A1I0.NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 3, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lan, AICP, City Manager FROM: 'William J, O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer �Y. �J SUBJECT: SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR JULY 1, 1992 - APPROVAL OF AMENDED PARCEL MAP NO. 11891, LOCATED GENERALLY AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND JERSEY BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY RCOC ASSOCIATED L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the date for public hearing for approval of Amended Parcel Map No. :1891 for July 1, 1992. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The developer, RCOC Associates L.P., a California Limited Partnership, filed an application for Development Review No. 91 -07. On December 17, 1991, the Planning Commission approved said Development Review with a condition for an amended map to relocate the on -site inundation areas common property lines of Parcels 22 and 23, access easements on parcels 5 and 22 and to add an access easement on Parcel 7. The attached resolution sets the date for a public hearing to approve Anmended Parcel Map 11891 for July 1, 1992. Respectfully submitted;, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:4h Attachment -15- RESOLUTION N0. t JV- l 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO APPROVE AMMENDED PARCEL MAP 11891 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the Amended Parcel Map No. 11891, consisting of 26 parcels, submitted by RCDC Associated L.P., A Cal Ifornla Limited Partnership, Subdivider, located generally at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Jersey Boulevard, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NOW THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that notice is hereby given that on July 1, 1992, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga any and all persons having objections to the Amended Parcel Map 11891 may appear and show cause why said map should not record. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. C/L ARROW ROUTE '=L aA .� °CL 1 PCL °CL i ], •s..n LNi b LtY W ]i1 p Llff d ]. ul �q 2 L Qi b I C °OL 7 I.s b PCL •3 ] S O °CL 1 44 °', V P;,L 3 i °OL 19 fa r NI r P L ] ].alb r1 I /Cl 17 oCl E i 4.011 r Y/ f41i� PCl 14 Ip. 37 i.If 4 gall aw f0 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIMONGA ENG1;"7EERING DIVISION I POL '.I 13.1m � Oct 20 Lm d WII.P 11 PCL 11 I ' I TrI7Z- ,AMENDED PARCEL MAP 11891 EXHIBIT: -- N NW 1 l Y • i 1 M •• Mt • 1' N Y • Y t C'. • •,• 1 1 11 i• ' Y• Y• SY IS 11> Y ]I 1 11 NY • 0. C I. 31 • >. •11 •' a•• I5. Y 5 ' 1 •lilt :. I •a U •1 • •.Y 114011 1 5• N •• IY Y M I • • • >• Y5. zi 11 •> >1 ACTIVITIES AS A CCNDITICIIAILY • >•. 1 >I l WITHIN SUBAREA SC t 1 I • >. It • 1 1 1• •• 5 1> OCNE)ITICHNMY V : 1 >• lY WITHIN •Y' 7 RESPECTIVELY • I 1 11 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: S$MCN 1: Part IV, Figure IV-9, is hereby amended as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." SEMON 2: Part III, Table III -1, is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Ddhibit "B." SECTION 3: Part IV is hereby amended to add "Automotive Service Court" and "Specialty Building Supplies and Fiume Improvements- as conditionally Permitted use within Subarea 7 as shown in the attached Ddnibit "C." SECTION 4: Part III, Table III -2, Sanction D, land use type defini- tion for "Automotive Service must" and "Specialty Building Supplies and Moue Improvements" are hereby added to read, in words and figures, as follows: AMUTIVE SERVICE OOIIIkf: An integrated cluster of related automotive service activities, which typically include: gas stations; service stations, with or without ancillary uses such as car washes and foal marts; automotive service and repair including mufflers, shocks, aligrcments, brakes, oil charges, lubrications, Gone -ups, Smog checks, and tire repair and replacement; installation of air conditioning, car phones, stereos, windshields, and upholstery; windshield tinting; sale of auto puts; and other related services. Services typically provided in the category "Automotive and Truck Repair - Major" are specifically prohibited. Auto Courts shall comply with the following design criteria: - Mvcin m size: A aces. - Mist be anchored by a gas or service station. - Maximum frontage along a major or seocxdary arterial strest: 300 feet. - No as to the site will be permitted directly off any major arterial. �g Ordinance No. 496 Page 2 - Service bays and pump islands shall be screened from all major and secondary arterials through a combination of berms, land- scaping, low walls, and building orientation. - An appropriate combination of berms, landscaping, and ardu- tectural elements shall be provided around the entire perimeter of the site to minimize the impact of the auto cast uses from the existing and future surrounding uses. - Outdoor storage of inoperative vehicles, parts, or eguiFamt is prohibited. - All work shall be conducted indoors. - All Signage shall be limited to signs approved under a Uniform Sign Program. CPECLUTY BDILDM SUPPLIES AND FINE ? 15i Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retail and wholesale sales and installation of specialty items, such as paint, wall /floor/window coverings, doers and windows, building materials, hardware, phm*aM and electrical Supplies, bath and kitcdhe: fixtures and sumlies, lighting, miming pools and supplies, and garden furnishings, materials and supplies. Activities shall be conducted in enclosed buildings of 25,000 sguare feet r less. Dimes excluded from this category are general merchandise sues. SBCPIQJ 5: This Council finds that this amerdnent will not adversely effect the environment and thereby issues a Negative Declaration. SUVIE M 6: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a oast of eropetett jurisdiction, or by reasm of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, para- graphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance Shall amain in full force and effect. SdMON 7: The Mayes shall sign this Ordinance and the City Cleric shall muse the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least are in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of ganharal circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPPFD this 3rd day of Jim, 1992. AYES: Alexander, Buguet, Stout, Williams, Wright ABSENT: Nos Iq ordinance No. 496 Page 3 Dernhis L. StoUt, Mayor Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBPA J. ARMS, C N CEMf K of the City of Rancho Q=m ga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance vas introdLxmd at a regular meeting of the CmwrII of the City of Rance 01camonga held on the 20th day of May, 1992, and vas finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Ctramo ga held on the 3rd day of June, 1992. MWa ted this 4th day of June, 1992, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adaus, City Clerk 0 FIG. ry -t SUBAREA 7 t 3 V a .a Y O H a at S i CMCM111M mtl _ MMaL aw &O.r. ........ PaMrar . C a 11 Cara.r IYe MaYrl a� IM&S.r. ease MM6 arq. .� K r aw 10.r.. �a Y �� Harr tbrrl rrr aeeer aw. � YwaCe _ ...... aYloeeea :__._. M�Ma drier o dam wua' z r.r twat tia r r arlYeaYar re Oe•a r wre.raaaa raY. A phi 'Ir rw wr w_r. r ar.rl4 awe r r.ae art re aae.oa� ae4Mea M Ire r Ir C'm 0--W a s eYe re Y M Ordinance No. 496 Page 5 TALE SUMMARY OF LAND B SEI�TYPE • PERMITTED BY SUBAREA USE + CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE: Mon -m,kac Us** Not P•rmgl,q USE TYPES Land Us IP GI GI GI GI GI Sman•s MO IP Ir 01 • GI 01 Ip 01 GI MI •P iI MANUFACTURING f I ] s 3 6 1 8 • .0 �� t31J �. '5 ':e t) Caetam L:anl ..V • • 1 • • • • • • lJ • • I • Lt/ P �J e • MHis, "a'"Non -04e1 Mae" BI } ! }J 1 Urals I I I Iasi. + No • fa rq ` — :. Plafaa,en41 /04,911 Servlee• LI•Irt wwt Amnlal Con Aete•wor• FI••t {14••• Awemotly R•l"I'L••am• M= wn•ar• iusm Trial R••Y.YIoo, Aetam•Ily /Tr,,k RRP•a -M•Iw Ault r e" same Autonotive Service Court A•tweetlr• SwrM:e Stollen eWl•M{ CanVeetar'• Storages Yere •alb{ Y•ht••we• 9- so•• {I" s, { Lpntbe Isuft -• it lrwWee A {•h waftwo wN► now A M,•w • suaawee Lmewl S4,eee Cerww•R SOM Sealer as Can•l.•nce S•1•• A E, •rp• + Enntt•rusooM•rR btee{l11•t•r� 4 [Af+rsolre arwa•1 t.wrww•y Feet Fee• "a• + FnrwteMA •wre'4M• a said add, ow "', Foe• A {•rw•N $•aee t assigned A Cl MRw, {f•f•N Hasty E•Me1M1R &,M• A MM" N~y Laun•rl Sw,eN PM•we•ypyrt r w• {wry • Reran•• h proorts tlwy R•or•••preM food w 4 Rarer {w7Y•e Scrap OtMM••t1eR oma Inv,. � arm' •: r!1•I•'�•�•1�rI9 h' -!•Ia o4 4i�• CMRwal • t +h` . • `101. - A lowlel•• Mweet Utwq p••4eee ,+ ♦� Flo" cortbovurwy Cw,•w • • • • • • • • • � . � L >tiuAwwrrrp i ♦ ♦ t i�4I�l +m+ C Fantle safety A Ulllnl SerYmee + 1 ♦ + ♦ ♦ + + + 4 +' ♦ + ♦ + ♦ ♦ t POSOI�� Allow" • U- Ineygltel /b1l eldr•nN•1 In•WVbI YI /MWInImIRn Image% M•lar MO-M•vn Ave. overlay District NFM••p ln•e,rl Al Bin • ♦ , _ • } r• ♦ + I 4 4 + • I • • � • _, + f � + 4 If It� ♦ + +I 4 4 : ♦ 4i 41 1 ♦ i ♦ f • s • • + +'le •I•� i •I + ♦ • f +I+ 41I♦ ♦ ♦ fl ••t4+ } ♦1I + 4 • • • • • • • • 4 4 ♦ 4 +I + ++, ♦ t i t ♦ 4 ♦ +�y�-�+ 1 'I • • ♦ • 1 - +� i i 4 t + + ♦ �+ I t t ♦ ♦ ♦ +L� +t +IfI • paso • 1. 1 CMRwal • t +h` . • `101. - A lowlel•• Mweet Utwq p••4eee ,+ ♦� Flo" cortbovurwy Cw,•w • • • • • • • • • � . � L >tiuAwwrrrp i ♦ ♦ t i�4I�l +m+ C Fantle safety A Ulllnl SerYmee + 1 ♦ + ♦ ♦ + + + 4 +' ♦ + ♦ + ♦ ♦ t POSOI�� Allow" • U- Ineygltel /b1l eldr•nN•1 In•WVbI YI /MWInImIRn Image% M•lar MO-M•vn Ave. overlay District NFM••p ln•e,rl Al OMinanoe No. 496 Page 6 SUBAREA 7 Land Use Designation Industrial Park Primary Function Subarea 7 occupies an area directly south of Foothill Boulevard which represents an important land use edge between the City's Industrial Area and community oriented non - industrial area and is a gateway to the City, A mW or industrial, office, and commercial development on approximately 300 acres is currently undergoing phased construction, Within this area is a planned Civic Center which will include San Bernardino County and City offices. Permitted Uses Custom Manufacturing Light Manufacturing Administrative and Office Professional /Design Services Research Services Light Wholesale, Storage, Distribution Building Maintenance Services Business Supply Retail Sales and Services Business Support Services Communication Services Eating and Drinking Establishments Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services Motel /Motel Administrative Civic Services Flood Control /Utility Corridor Conditional Uses Automotive Rental /Leasing Automotive sales Automotive service station Cdnvenience Sales and Services Entertainment Fast Food Sales Food and leverage Sales Medical /health Care Services Personal services Recreation Facilities Cultural Public Assembly Public Safety and Utility Services Automotive Religious Assembly Service court] Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements 1✓XHlblfi `G ` (Y-48 a1M171AIKE ND. 498 1.'J t I• Y 1 1 i• • 11 • i ,1 M • M •.'. • 11 1 ) • I • 5• 1 • • 1 • Y • Y• •. YI• • ••t • 54V• t t '• 5 /• 5•.IL D •'• •l t• The City Council of the City of Rands Cucancrga does hereby ordain as follows: 0=0N 1: A new Chapter 6.04 hereby is added to title 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cade to react, in coals and figures, as follows: "Potentially Dangerous and /or Vicious Dogs I'Sec.-ticm: "6.04.010 I Intent "6.04.020 D Definitions "6.04.030 N No Applicability of Qtapter "6.04.040 I Initiation of Hearing to Determine Dog as Potentially Dargerous or Vicious "6.04.050 S Seizure aryl nVotinctlient pe ALng Hearing "6.04.060 N Notice of Hearing "6.04.070 H Hearing Procedure; Evidence; Standard of Proof 116.04.080 F Failure to Appear 16.04.090 n n tern;.ution; Findings; Orders 116.04.100 N Notice and Service of Orders 116.04.110 C Cir'ainstanoes Urder Mich Dogs May Not Be Declared Potentially Danqerc. s or Vicious "6.04.120 C Conditional Release of Potentially Dangerous or Vicious Dog 116.04.130 R Registration aid Fees "6.04.140 D Death, Sale, 'Transfer or Pernarment Removal; Notice "6.04.150 R Relocation Within City "6.04.160 R Removal from List of Potentially rnngerrous Dogs 116.04.170 D Destruction, Remval from City or CRdi.tim Release of Vicious Dogs 116.04.180 P Prohibition from Owning or Keeping Dogs 16.04.190 S Severability 116.04.200 P Penalties for Violation of Chapter 116.04.210 C Civil. Remedies Available This Chapter is enacted n„'�unt to the authority of Article 11, Section 7 of the Constitution of the State of California and California Food and Agricultural Code Section 31683 and is intended to provide effective regulations and controls pertaining to Dangerous and /or vicious dogs within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and to ensure prcupt and adequate procedural medranisas to control the threat of Dangerous and /or vicious dogs to the health, safety and welfare of the cammity. mm Ordinance No. 498 Page 2 "6.04. 20 DefinitittLS. "A. 'Animal control Department, shall mean that entity designated by the City ce uucil for pouposas of animal licensing, rare, control, and regulation and shall inel'ade any public or private agency providing animal control services pursuant to contract or statute. „B. 'City' means the City of Panda Cucamonga and shall include all territory within the incorporated limits of the City whether now PXistitg or as incorporated within or annexed thereto from time to time. ^C. 'F]hclosu re' means a fence or structure suitable to prevent the entry of young children, and which is suitable to confine a vicious dog in conjunction with other measures which may be taken by the owner or keeper of the dog. The enclosure shall be designed so as to prevent the animal from escaping. The animal shall be horsed pursuant to Section 597t of the California Penal Code as the same may be amended form time to time. „D. 'Hearing officer' means the City Marmger of City or his or her designee. 'E. 'Impounded' meatus taken uto the custody of the Animal Control Department. „y. 'Potentially Dangerous Dag' means any of the following: ^(i) Are dog which, when unprovoked, on two separate occasions within the prior thirty -six (36) month period, engages in any behavior that requires defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury when the person and the dog are off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog. 1, (ii) Any dog which, when npravoked, bites a person causing a less severe injury than as defined in Section 6.04.020H. „( iii) Airy dog which, when unprovoked, on two separate oecasio>s within the prior thirty -six (36) month period has killed, seriously bitten, inflicted injury, or otherwise caused injury to a domestic animal off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog. „c. 'Severe Injury' means any physical injury to a human being that results in muscle tears or disfiguring lacerations or, reg irs,.e multiple sutures or corrective or cosmetic surgery. „H. 'Vicious Dog' means any of the following: „(i) Any dog seized under Section 599aa of the California Penal Cede as the ram may be amended from time to time, and upon the sustaining of a conviction of the caner or keeper order subdivision (a) of Section 597.5 of the C�difoxnia Penal Code, as the same may be amended from time to time. ^(ii) Any dog which, when unprovoked, in an aggressive manner, inflicts severe injury on or kills a human being. Cr Ordinance No. 498 Page 3 "( iii) Airy dog previously determined to be and currently listed as a potentially D,irrjercus deg which, after its owner or keeper has been notified of such determination, continues or repeats the behavior described in Section 6.04.020F, inflicts severe injury on a human being or is maintained in violation of this Chapter or in violation of airy crder(s) imposed after a hearing and determination pursuant to this Chapter. "6.04.030 NM Applicability of Canter. The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to arty dog utilized by any law enforcement department or arty law enforcement officer in the performance of police nark. "6.04.040 Initiation of Hearing to Determine Dog as Potential) Da or Vicious. If any animal control officer or arry law enforcement officer determines that there exists reasonable muse to believe that a dog is potentially dangerous or vicious, the chief officer of the Animal Control Department, or his or her designee, or the head of the local law enforoemnt agency, or his or her designee, shall petition the hearing officer for a hearing for the pffposes of determining whether or not the dog in question should be declared potentially Dangerous or vicious. SOhenever possible, any complaint received from a member of the public which serves as the evidentiary basis for the animal control officer or law enforcement officer to find reasonable cause shall be sw urn to and verified by the complainant and shall be attached to the petition. "A. If upon investigation it is determined by the animal control officer or law enforcement officer that reasonable cause exists to believe the dog in question poses an immediate threat to public safety, then the animal control officer or law enforcement officer may seize and impound the dog pending any hearing to be held pursuant to this Chapter. The owner or keeper of the dog shall be liable to the City for the oasts and expenses of keeping the dog, if the dog is later determined to be potentially Dangerous or vicious. "H. Whenever a dog has been impounded pursuant to subdivision A. and it is not contrary to public safety, the chief animal mhrtrvl officer shall permit the animal to be confined, at the owner's or keeper's expense, in a kennel or veterinary facility approved by the Animal control Department. "6.04.060 Notice of HearirxJ. Dtenever a petition for the determination that a dog is potentially Dangerous or vicious has been filer] with the hearing officer, the chief officer of the Animal Control Department shall notify the owner or keeper of the dog that a hearing will be held before the hearing officer at which time the owner or keeper may present evidence as to why the dog should not be declared potentially D or vicious. The owner or keeper of the dog shall be served with notice of the hearing and a copy of the petition, either personally or by first class mail, return receipt requested. The notice of hearing shall specify the date, time and place of the hearing to be owxhsted before the hearing officer and shall advise the owner or keeper of the dog of that person's opportunity to personally appear, or be represented by counsel, and to present evidence in opposition to the petition. The hearing shall be held not less than five (5) working days nor more than ten (10) working days after service of the notice of hearing upon the owner or keeper of the dog. V Ordinance No. 498 Page 4 "6.04.070 Hearin Procedure; Evidence; Standard of Proof. The hearing on the petition to determine if a dog is potentially Dangerous or vicious before the hearing officer shall be open to the public. The hearing officer may admit into evidence all relevant evidence, including incident reports and the affidavits of witnesses. in determining whether a dog is or is not potentially Dargercu or vicious, evidence of the following shall be considered at said hearing: "A. Any previous history of the dog attacking, biting or causing injury to a human being or other animal; "B. The nature and extent of injuries inflicted and the nualer of victim involved; "C. The place where the bite, attack or injury occurred; "D. The Presence * or absence of any provocation for the bite, attack or injury; "E. 'The extent to which property has been damaged or destroyed; "F. %hether the dog exhibits any characteristics of being trained for fighting or attack and other evidence tending to show such training; "G. 4Enether the dog exhibits characteristics of aggressive or unpredictable teWerament or behavior in the presence of human beings or other domestic animals. 'T3. Riether the dog can be effectively trained or retrained to change its tarherament or behavior; "I. The manner in which the dog has been maintained by its owner or keeper. "J. Any other relevant evidence wnoerning the maintenance of the dog by the owner or keeper. "K. Any other relevant evidence regarding the ability of the owner or keeper of the dog to prevent injuries to the public if the dog is permitted to remain in the custody of uhe Owner or keeper of the dog. "The hearing officer may find, upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the dog is potentially Dangerous or vicious and make such orders as are authorized by this Chapter. 116_04.080 Failure to Appeal•. The hearing officer may decide all issues for or against the owner or keeper of the dog even if the owner or keeper fails to appear at the hearing. 116.04.090 Determination: Findings; Orders. Basel upon the evidence presented at the hearing, the hearing officer shall determine whether the dog should be classified as potentially Dangerous or vicious. The hearing officer shall make such findings as are necessary to support the determination as to whether the dog is potentially Dangerous or vicious and may make such orders (�I Ordinance No. 498 Page 5 as are deemed reasonably naaessary, in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter, pertaining to the release, conditional release, xe al frr the City or other disposition of the dog. 116.04.100 Notice and Service of Orders. "A. At the conclusion of the hearing wrffimtsd pursuant to Section 6.04. 070, the owner or keeper of the dog shall be notified, in writing, of the determination, findings and orders issued by the hearing officer, either perscrally or by first class mail, postage prepaid. If a determination is made that the dog is potent' lly Dangerous or vicious, the owner or keeper shall comply with all conditions and orders of the hearing officer in accordance with the time schedule established by the hearing officer. No dog farad to be potentially Daroercus or vicious shall be released to the owner or keeper thereof until and unless the Animal Control Department shall file with the hearing officer a determination that all of the terms and conditions of the order of release have been or will be complied with in a reasonable time. "B. If the owner or keeper of the dog contests the determination and /or orders of the hearing officer, he or she may, within five (5) days of the receipt of the notice of determination, appeal the decision of the hearing officer to the Municipal Cant in accordance with the provisions of California Flood and Agriculture CUde Section 31622. Otherwise, the decision of the hearing officer shall be final. 116.04.110 Ci=]Mstances Onder uhlch Doan May Not Be Dec Potentially Dangerous or yigicuD. "A. If, upon the conclusion of the presentation of the evidence at the hearing, the hearing officer determines that any of the following is true, then the hearing officer shall not declare the dog potentially dangerous or Vicious: "(1) If any injury or damage was sustained by a person who, at the time of the injury or damage was sustained, was committing a willful trespass or other tot upon the premises occupied by the owner or of the dog or was c neittirg or attaipting to omit a crime upon the premises: 11(iil If any injury or damage was sustained by a person who, at the time the injury or damage was sustained, was teasing, tormenting, abusing or assaulting the dog; "(iii) If the dog, at the time any injury or damage was sustained, was protecting or defending a person within the invediate vicinity of the dog from an attach, assault, battery, crime or attempt to commit an attack, assault, battery or crime; or "(iv) If any injury or damage was sustained by a domestic animal which , at the time the injury or damage was sustained, was teasing, tormenting, abusing or assaulting the dog. 'OB. No dog may be declared potentially dangerous or vicious if the injury or damage to a darvestic animal was sustained while the dog was corking as a hunting dog, herding dog, or predator control dog on the property of, or under the control of, its owner or keeper, and the damage or injury was to a 6rtlinW)oe Nat 498 page 6 "6.04.12 G corditiwal Release o FFbtentiallV DaruPSO3s or Vicious P29- "If, at the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing offices determines that the dog in question is a potentially dangerous dog, the hearing officer shall order release of the dog to the owner or keeper of the dog conditioned upon the owner or keeper of the dog agreeing to any ar all of the following requirements as the Haring officer deems reasonably necessary to prevent any risk to public safety: "A. Mile on the property of the owner or keeper, the potentially daraperous; dog shall, at all times, be kept indoors, or in an enclooure approved by the Animal Control Department. "B. At all times when the potentially Dangerous dog is riot on the Premises of the owner or keeper, the animal shall be securely muzzled and restrained by a substantial leash, of appropriate length, and Hander the control of a person eighteen (18) years of age or older, who is physically capable of restraining the dog. "C. The owner or keeper of the dog shall provide and maintain financial responsibility for injuries to the public by obtaining and Wining proof of liability insurance in a form and amount deemed acceptable by the hearing officer in light of all the ciramstan oes. "D. 'IDs Owner or keeper of the dog shall display, in a prominent place upon the premises wherein the dog is kept or maintained, a sign easily readable by the public using the words "BEWARE CF DW- in letters at least three (3) Indies in height. "E. 'IIhe hearing officer may impose any other requirements deemed reasonably necessary to prevent injuries to the public. 'F. If, at arry time after a potentially dangerous or vicious cog has been conditiaally released to the owner or keeper, the owns' or keeper thereof fails to comply with each and every condition imposed thereon, the Animal Control Department stall seize and dmpound the dog in question, petition the hearing officer to caduct a hearing pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter and order the removal or destruction of the dog, or sudi other order or determination as the hearing officer finds appropriate. Any order(s) made by the hearing officer hereunder shall be final, subject to appeal pursuant to the provisions of section 6.04.100, above. "6..4.170 Registration and Fees. Any dog determined to be a potentially Dangerous or vicious dog shall be properly licensed and vaccinated. The Animal Cntrol Department stall include the designation of 'potentially dangerous dog' or 'vicious', as the case may be, in the registration records of the dog in question, either after the owner or keeper of the dog has agreed to the designation or after the determination by the hearing officer that such designation applies to the dog in question. The Animal Control Dextrtzent may charge a reasonable fee as determined by the city Council in addition to the regular licensing fee to provide for the in>¢eiised costs of maintaining the rarnt3s of any potentially dangerous or vicious dog. Ur v^rdir» NO. 498 Page 7 "6.04.140 Death. Sale. 'Transfer or s2.,ea,.e..r Remval: Notice. If a dog determiner) to be a potentially dangerous or vicious dog dies, or is sold, transferred or permanently removed from the City, the owner ar keeper of such Potentially dangerous or vicious dog shall notify the Animal Control Department of the charged condition and new location of the dog, in writing, within two (2) wanking days of the dwrFed condition in question. 116.04.150 FeIQQQticn within city. No owner or keeper of a potentially dangerous or vicious dog shall transfer w remove the animal from the premises to any other premises within the City (emept solely far veterinary care) without first notifying the Animal Control DeFarbwnt, in writing, at least five (5) working days prior thereto and shall permit the Animal Control Department to investigate and certify as to the adequacy of any enclesrre ar any other control medwlisw for the animal at the new premises within the city. "6.04.160 Removal from List of Potentially pzxxxous _. If these are W additional incidents of any of the types of behavior described in Section 6.04.020.F. of this chapter within a thirty-six (36) month period from the date of designation as a potentially dangerous dog, the dog shall be removed from the list of potentially dargerams dogs. The dog may, but is not required to be, removed from the list of potentially dangerous dogs prior to the expiratim of such thirty -six (36) month period if the owner ar keeper demonstrates to the Animal Control I7epartmment that charges in circumstance or measles taken by the Owner or keeper, such as training of the dog, have mitigated the risk to the public safety. "6.04.170 Destruction. PRncval from City or Conditional Wlease of vicious Dons. "A. If at the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing officer determines that a dog is a vicious dal, the tearing officer may order the saw to be destroyed by the Animal Control Department if the hearing officer finds, at the conclusion of the hearing, that the release of the dog would create a significant threat to the public health, safety and welfare or that the release of the dog to the owner or keeper would clearly constitute a danger to hinan beings or domestic animals. "B. If the hearing officer determines, at the conclusion of the hearing that a vicious dog nay be returned to its owner and not destroyed, the hearing officer may hqp se such conditions upon the wrership or keeping of the dog, including, but not limited to, the conditions set forth in sections 6.04.120 through 6.04.150, irrlusive, of this Chapter in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare. I.C. Any dog determined to be vicious and conditionally released Pursuant to this Chapter shall permanently be placed an the list of vicious dogs. "6.04.180 Fr ibitim from Nnim or Kewina Does, The carer or keeper of any dog determined to be a vicious dog by the hearing officer, may be prohibited by the officer from awning, possessing, controlling or having custody of any dog far a period of up to three (3) years if the tearing officer finds, at the conclusion of the hearing, that ownership or possession of a dog by that person would create a significant threat to the public 9 b Ordinance No. 498 Page 8 ^6.04.190 Severability. 7 he City Council declares that, should any Provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of thus Chapter be rex kme or declared invalid by any final cast action in a court of competent jo isdio- tion, or by reason of any preeuptive legislative, the remaining provisions paracga;1m, sentences and lords of this chapter shall r®in in full sections, force and effect. ^6.04.200 BMAWx far +� . It shal unlawful be lawful for Vio ;ph � any person, firm, partnership, ar corporation to violate any provision or to fail to c mply with any of the raprtr+eRmts of this Quapter. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provisions of this Chapter or failing to cxnply with any of its roegUirmen.tc shall be deed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by iWrism ent not e=sedinrg six (6) months, or by both such fine and iugriscrment. Each and every person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter is o®itted, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership or ration, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as provided in this Chapter. "6.04.210 Civil Emx es Ava-lable. Tha violation of any of the Provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a nuisance and my be abated by the City thrwgh civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or pen'""rmt injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances." SELMCN 2: 'Due Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inlay yallaV Daii1V Ekjlletin, a newspaper of generall circulation publisher) in the city of Ontario, California, and circulated in the city of Rancho Oxamonga, California. 9j C71)MOCE NO. 307B • 1 Y• I •,1 la I. 1 • M1 a' ♦• l 1 • 1 • V• • YI• ••. •aYV1 I • 1 a 1•,V ' la V' n n a la •1 I •� • • • a m 11 b I: Yp IY • 1 I a•. v • D • I• ••1I to I• 1 a • • •1 :•• 1 ml Taal I 11 •• M■ :U 1 a NOW, 'IIB'REEOIE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Clrcamonga does hereby ordain as follows: 6FX' W 1: Chapter 2.28 of the Ranctho CAcanonga Mumhicipal Code hereby is amended to read as follows: 2.28.010 Created 2.28.020 Role of Commission 2.28.030 Membership - Generally 2.28.040 Membership - Terms of Appointment 2.28.050 Membership - RMMV l of Members 2.28.060 Regular Meetings 2.28.070 Officers 2.28.010 Cam. There is and shall retain in the City government a Citizens Environmental Management emission (hereinafter "CEW") , a body replacing the Citizens Advisory Commission which hereby is dissolved. 2.28.020 Role of OwnisQion. 'the CEMC shall act in an advisory capacity to the City Council and planning mission on environmental issues. 2.28.030 MmbnmhW - Generally. The CFMC shall consist of a total of five (5) members. Members of the CEMC shall be residents of Rancho nraMonga and shall be appointed by the City Camcil. A subc®ittee of the City Council shall sutmit to the City Council the name of any person proposed for appointment to the CEW and iWon much appointment by the City Council, the rhame of the appointee shall be recorded in the minures of the City Council meetings. 2,28.04 Membership - Rlerms of Anbointment. 'the five (5) meters of the CEMC initially appointed shall determine the length of their terms by lot. Three (3) members shall serve a term of far (4) years and shall continue in office until their respective terms expire unless sooner removed as provided in this ordinance, and their su»oessors shall he appointed for terms of fan- (4) years. 'TWO (2) members shall serve for a term of two q2 ordinance No. 307B Page 2 (2) years and shall cmtine in office until heir respective terms expire unless soarer roved as provided in this ordinance, and their successes shall be appointed for t8rme of four (4) years. If a vacancy shall occur, other than hY expiration of the term of office, it shall be filled by appointment of the City council for the unexpired term. 2.28.0 Membership - R®oval of MeimYbecs. Any member of the CEM may be removed at any time by a majority vote of the entire City cc ncil. 2.28.060 Facm_ar w.,n- ;.,nz. Regular meetings of the CEDE shall be established by resolution of the CEW. 2.28.070 Off c,£g. 4he C EPE shall select a chairperson to preside at all meetings of the CENC, and a vice chairperson to preside in the absence of the chairperson. 'Due secretary to the CF2C shall be designated by the City Manager. Sa=OR 2• The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance. SE7LTIQl 3: 'Die Mayor stall sign this Oedirwma and the City Cleric shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least Once in the Tn1aM V 11eV �i1V Bullets , a of general circulation published in ttr City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cuaano ga, California. 43 APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14211 - U.S. HOME CORPORATION - An appeal to Planning Commission's decision denying the proposed tentative tract map and design review of 226 single family lots on 81.2 acres of land within the Etiwanda Specific_ Plan in the Low Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue south of the Devore Freeway and west of East Avenue - APN: 1100- 041 -09, 1100 - 081 -02, 1100- 171 -01 and 13, 1100 - 181 -01, 1100 - 141 -01 and 02, 1100- 191-01. Related File: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 89 -03. (Continued from April 1, 1992.) RECONffiiDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive any further public testimony relative to the above- referenced project. If after receiving input on the project, the Council determines that a further continuance is appropriate, then the project should be continued to a date specified at the Council's discretion. If the 60 -day request is acceptable, then this item should be continued to August 5, 1992. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this public hearing is to consider whether a further continuance of these projects would be acceptable to the Council. The applicant is requesting that these items be continued an additional 60 days to allow the development team to process modified subdivision layouts with input from the Planning Commissioners prior to further Council review. a_ACAGRDOND: These items were continued from the April 1 to the June 3, 1992 City Council meeting to allow Lhe applicant the opportunity to redesign the subdivision map to meet the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, while providing the reduced minimum average lot size of 6,500 square feet, as requested by the related Etiwanda specific Plan Amendment. The original intent of this continuance was to receive LA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT .a DATE- June 3, 1992 `!! .O: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -03 - U.S. HOME CORPORATION - Appeal to Planning Commission's decision recommending denial of the request to amend certain development standards within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14211 - U.S. HOME CORPORATION - An appeal to Planning Commission's decision denying the proposed tentative tract map and design review of 226 single family lots on 81.2 acres of land within the Etiwanda Specific_ Plan in the Low Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue south of the Devore Freeway and west of East Avenue - APN: 1100- 041 -09, 1100 - 081 -02, 1100- 171 -01 and 13, 1100 - 181 -01, 1100 - 141 -01 and 02, 1100- 191-01. Related File: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 89 -03. (Continued from April 1, 1992.) RECONffiiDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive any further public testimony relative to the above- referenced project. If after receiving input on the project, the Council determines that a further continuance is appropriate, then the project should be continued to a date specified at the Council's discretion. If the 60 -day request is acceptable, then this item should be continued to August 5, 1992. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this public hearing is to consider whether a further continuance of these projects would be acceptable to the Council. The applicant is requesting that these items be continued an additional 60 days to allow the development team to process modified subdivision layouts with input from the Planning Commissioners prior to further Council review. a_ACAGRDOND: These items were continued from the April 1 to the June 3, 1992 City Council meeting to allow Lhe applicant the opportunity to redesign the subdivision map to meet the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, while providing the reduced minimum average lot size of 6,500 square feet, as requested by the related Etiwanda specific Plan Amendment. The original intent of this continuance was to receive LA CITY COLMC71, :+'GAFF REPORT VTT 13211 6 ESPA 89 -03 - U.S. HOMES June 3, 1992 Page 2 comments from the Planning Commission which would be forwarded to the City Council for further consideration of the vesting Tentative Tract Map and related Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment. Since the April 1, 1992 City Council meeting, staff has encouraged the applicant to submit, as soon as possible, any new alternatives for our consideration. Staff did most with the applicant on April 18, 1992 and discussed an agreeable schedule that would have made it possible for the Council to review alternatives on June 3, 1992. As of the writing of this report, no revised subdivision layouts have been received fro. the applicant. Aesp ly su ..d, Brad ller i Cit�....ncer BB: SH:mlq Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant `1 J uo: rn� „Ne o V NE�nW ncf _ •Ait .0 wn•[ aerr. .fir. 11.11 A .eP. �w pnrlp.. o, Reid & Hellyer • .Oei Ord Cf .ON IJOD N 8IV88FII]6. CAliIOlLV•IA B'dp021'100 - :c.N aHE vin eee.l. >I . c.xx o.�[n vl.l ea ex Nye e'e s2wo<+ J[9 A. P,J 4E[n„�HOS May 13, 1992 Mr. Steve Hayes, Assistant City Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 eeec _ouo� rnai, rn �H co. eDD F .P90W ✓[.:C LV[FU[ 9.H e[PV..OIN 4. O� pY.O� v.I ee•wo. ee.eJea 7L _[rr[eceH ev.NOc - .[c m +. c. ¢reeo iaa eie.LE. :e HuMeiN U 61-001 Re: U.S. Homes Tentative Tract 14211 and Specific Plan Amendment Dear Steve: The purpose of this letter is to request a continuance of the hearing on Tract 14211 for 60 days. This matter is presently set for hearing on May 27, 1992. It is my understanding that this matter is also set for hearing by the City Council on June 3, 1992. we would request the matter be continued for at least 90 days so that we may have the hearing by the Council following the hearing of the Planning Commission. U.S. Homes waives any of the deadlines set forth under the Permit Streamlining Act. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter. CITY OF F� /-�v it�l`C"'d4UCAMONGA PLANNING- DI17I,SION Sincerely, RHID i NKLLYSR A P SS5 ALJ_�D TI C s llot�lu� l 4(P / DIME SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVMOP ?SEAT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR PROGRAM YEAR 1992 -93 AND AMENDMENT TO THE 1989 -90 AND 1990 -91 FINAL STATEMENTS FOR REPR'JGRAM.MINS OF FUNDS - The adoption of the Final Sta to msrt o' Commrtmity Development Objectives for program year 1992 -93 and the. final selection of projects based on a Brant of $551,000 and 513,260 in program income, and related amendments to the 1989 -90 and 1990 -91 Final Statements to allow reprogramming of funds. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council take tl,e following actions: 1. Receive for discussion and public input, the Final Statement of community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds (Final Statement) for the Community Development Block Grant (CUBS) program year 1992 -93; and 2. Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Final Statement making ail findings, determinations, certifications, and adopting all policies therein authorizing the Mayor to submit the Final Statement, and any amendments thereto, and to act in connection with the submission of the Final Statement and to provide such additional information as may be required; and 3. Approve, by minute action, the reprogramming of $2,561 in funds from the 1989 -90 and 1990 -91 program years to be allocated to the House of Ruth, a public service activity which is receiving funding in the 1992 -93 program year, as well as a reprogramming of approximately $17,750 in prior year funds toward grant administration. ABSTRACT The Citizen's Participation Plan provides that the City Council hold an advertised public hearing prior to approving the Final Statement for the CDBG program year 1992 -93. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper one month prior to the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DA ^E: dune 3, 1992 u- T'): Mayor and Members of the ,i ay Co'uncii daoi; Lam, AICP, City manager FROM: Brad Boller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner /'CDBG Coordinator SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVMOP ?SEAT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR PROGRAM YEAR 1992 -93 AND AMENDMENT TO THE 1989 -90 AND 1990 -91 FINAL STATEMENTS FOR REPR'JGRAM.MINS OF FUNDS - The adoption of the Final Sta to msrt o' Commrtmity Development Objectives for program year 1992 -93 and the. final selection of projects based on a Brant of $551,000 and 513,260 in program income, and related amendments to the 1989 -90 and 1990 -91 Final Statements to allow reprogramming of funds. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council take tl,e following actions: 1. Receive for discussion and public input, the Final Statement of community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds (Final Statement) for the Community Development Block Grant (CUBS) program year 1992 -93; and 2. Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Final Statement making ail findings, determinations, certifications, and adopting all policies therein authorizing the Mayor to submit the Final Statement, and any amendments thereto, and to act in connection with the submission of the Final Statement and to provide such additional information as may be required; and 3. Approve, by minute action, the reprogramming of $2,561 in funds from the 1989 -90 and 1990 -91 program years to be allocated to the House of Ruth, a public service activity which is receiving funding in the 1992 -93 program year, as well as a reprogramming of approximately $17,750 in prior year funds toward grant administration. ABSTRACT The Citizen's Participation Plan provides that the City Council hold an advertised public hearing prior to approving the Final Statement for the CDBG program year 1992 -93. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper one month prior to the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG FINAL STATEMENT June 3, 1992 Page 2 meeting and notices were posted in community locations througbout the City ten days prior to the meeting. Following the public hearing, staff will amend the Final Statement, if necessary, as directed by the City Council, and submit the Final Statement to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). BACKGROUND On April 15, 1992, the City Council held a public hearing to discuss the community's objectives for the Community Development Block Grant program and to set priorities among the projects suggested by City staff, community organizations, and residents. Following the public hearing, the City Council approved the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives and directed staff to prepare a Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds which includes the following activities: Program Carry Over (Estimated) Administration $ 17,750 SW Cucamonga Streets $199,616 Sidewalk Grinding $ 11,424 Wheel Chair Ramps $ 11,410 Home Improvement $112,329 Oldtimers Foundation -0- Graffiti Removal $ 31,540 Fair Housing -0_ Landlord/Tenant -0- Neighborhood Center $ 67,777 Fair Housing Testing -0- House of Ruth $ 2,561 (Roping. from Sr. Shared; Homeless outreach -0- Contingency -0- FY 1992 -93 Total (Estimated) (Estimated) $ 92,450 $ 110,200 $147,130 $ 346,745 $ 5,940 $ 17,364 $ 6,936 $ 18,346 $227,292• $ 339,621* $ 5,000 5,000 $ 10,412 $ 41,952 $ 8,476 $ 8,476 $ 7,628 $ 7,628 $ 6,410 $ 74,187 $ 2,614 $ 2,814 $ 2,000 $ 4,561 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 31,770 $ 31,770 Total $564,258• $1,016,664 These totals include an estimated $13,260 in program income. Program income is received from repayment of deferred loans made from participants of the Home Improvement Program. Funds received will continue to be used to provide housing rehabilitation for lower income, single family homeowners. The amount is an approximation of what might be received. Income received will not be known until the end of the fiscal year on June 30, 1992. 0-1 City Council Staff Report CDHG Program Yr. 1392 -93 June 3, 1992 Page 3 ENVIRONKENTAL ASSESSNEW A11 of the proposed activities are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review. All pro3ects are either exempt or categorically excluded fro:.: the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA), contingent upon the implementation of mitigation, measures regarding flood insurance and historic preservation review previously adopted by the City Council. CONCLUSION The actions recommended above are adequate to meet all presubmission requirements for the CDHG program in order for the City to receive its 1992 -93 CDHG program year entitlement. Upon the submission of the Final Statement, the funds will be made available to the City on or about July 1, 1992. Aespe illy sub 0, / Hrad er City lanner BU: CN:mlq Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Final Statement of Co:mnunrcy Development Objectives Exhibit "H" - Resolution of Approval 1 1 FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR THE 1992 -93 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 1992 IDD Page I. STANDARD APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ....................1 II. INTRODUCIION ..................... ..............................2 III. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ....... ..............................4 IV. STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ..................5 V. PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS ........... ..............................7 VI. POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO FLOODPLAINS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES . ............................... 16 ViI. STATEMENTS OF POLICY ........... ............................... 19 A. Citizens' Participation Plan ............................ 19 H. Relocation Policy ........ ............................... 20 C. Residential Anti - Displacement Plan ...................... 21 D. Criteria for Substantial Change ......................... 22 VIII. CERTIFICATIONS ................. ............................... 24 jbl LIST OF FIGUI S - Figure No. Fa ge 1 Floodplain Boundary Map. ................................. *'*a*is I bZ APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE r..e w w.wv.'NE .J 4'.C,IrT H.AONNIIrM T 11 v Nm:.rr "uclT '� No.f nru DA4 YR fUWrnEO AgyC.IX tWMrNY B- 92 -MC-96 -0556 .. Yrt acEN[D a fTAn wu ADVUIOn b.nlXr Y/A A . Yn.ECEIVEO.v rf. W.01N I I a..,I.N,'.I,Ir tqn 4.m. r,t. Of Rancho Cucamonga .Nr,v D'.. uM ce,N Iuu ,M yO Cwrl P.O. Box 8G% 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucalaonga, CA 9172 9 . 1.11011. I�D .II AMM NUY,E. IEN1 2 1 1 o z . rvrew..rLKAnoN y'] w. ❑ ConlmuYOn E) A.nYOn V A.n,— Y^'!. ,W eja. YnYIEr n It.lal ❑ A ircryu A.nO B AnaIM AwWd C Kna11 WYm C D,.rau Dw,14n al., uA.1rh1 1. 41100 u• gD}ML DOYESM 'ALn"WE NVYaR 1 4 EI P TeIE Community Development Block Gle : 414 ✓Ifmv 11 POWICf w'Y... .anlnn. WN..b t 0,0Y.7.Gbr LMI Planping 0.CleiOn 0}440.1 NYM erE Y>.dvY rXNlp.r N :N Yrbn b tI rm : <W Or: m,:l.r, nw..V IN. ,pD.tlpbr Ipn..r1. cN"1 Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner I. M1/[ D/ AIRICINI: NnM A,~." NIY. Nl G0 /I IJr f /r wY H NO.o.r.Oml $clod De B GOdX/ I wl. (gNrf/rl0 YdIr WIM DI MyM le.rnfQ _ C f111.crDY - J N.. lllrnwYN G To W. R b PE,. E .WFNOl. -L .Y.1GN/ L W.rllruwp.l Y NWd 6yn(/Ibn G SwdM OrurrJ N alr IED..m f, IYYl D1 /fDEMLND.NC. U.S. Department of Housinq 6 Urban Developmel II. DSSCbIiM t w A..LK l ORCWt .. 1. Housing Rehabilitation: Moderate s Minor 2. Sidewalks s Street Improvements 3. Landlord /Tenant Mediation d Fair Housing 4. Community Facilities Improvements 5- Public Services: homeless ootreach; House of Ruth; Graffiti Removal City of Rancho Cucamonga II rsoresfD mncT . roNOavaNU TNCTfw S,Y, D.,. F,4 q Dau • App' D hD n 7/11/92 6/30/93 35 35 If ISWAAnDIY4MND' IL.Y AI•YcA• AOILAT1O M,nA W P.m StSCUMN 000En 1}Sn MgfffST T Tf.E . ciYY t 551x000 .W s VFS THE TtOWWaiCATf]Nw[Sf AVNA E O STATE EWCUME OIfDEA 12172 PMUSS FOIL YEVIEw ON DATE I•D ❑ PgpGgA. d NOT CAVENED B1 E O 1217} D AeDYAn1 t .00 c STAN a 1v:.1 t .00 Q DR FRC[iIW1 NA$ NDT MEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW Oar E W G,DDryn NrCmV E 13,260 OD 1r.•PIE AINIC4ff aLNIMRY70N ANN EEWIIAI Oan Q Na Sva'.nw .N YrDIYYIO, ®I1O v lol A: t 564,241 ro —_ rE l01Xf.EfIO.YN.Y0YlE0W AMD AfIIff All YfA IN MN AIRICE7XyI MfAI.lVi1D11 Y1EfI1W ANO Wlll1[C1. Mf DOCV.IEMXAfaENWLN 11 +d117ED fv IN( 40YF1YIM6 WDI OI 7N2 YILCUIf AND MI WLILAM NM1l COYhV MNII Mf .nACNfD LV VMNC[l If 1M 4fIfT.NC[ IS .NA/ID(D Aom,,,.0 A.y.fMI.NH D 1NY . iENN1UrY n1rmE.. Dennis L. Stout Mayor (714) 989 -1861 e $pn.lUr. d AN1vVa I . No 54.b 1 D3 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF :24 it a stacdard form used by applicants as a required facesheet for preappiications and applications submitted ederal assstance. It will be used by Federal agencies to obtain applicant certification tnat States which here penned a review and comment procedure in response to Executive Order 12372 and have selected the program included iri their process, have been given an opportunity to review the applicant's submission Emrv: Self-explanatory Date application submitted to Federal agency for State if applicable) & applicant's control number l if cap hcab le) State use oniy (if applicable). If this application is to continue or revise an existing award, enter present Federal identifier number !ffor a new project,!tave blank. Legal name of applicant, name of primary organizational unit which will undertake the assistance activity, complete address of the appiicant, and name and telephone number of the person to contact on matters related to this application Enter Employer IdentiLcation \umber (EIN) as assigned by the Internal Revenue Service. Enter the appropriate letter in the space provided Check appropriate box and enter appropriate I etterts) m the space(s) provided — "New" means a new assistance award. Continuation" means an extension for an additional funding /budget period for a project v,,tth a projected completiondate. — "Revision" means any change in the Federal Government's financial obligation or contingent liability from an existing obligation, tiame of Federal agency from which assistance is be i ng requested with this application. Lse the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and title of the program under which assistance is requested, Enter a brief descriptive title of the project if more than one program is involved, you should append an explanation on a separate sheet. If appropriate (e.g, construction or real property projects), attach a map showing project location. For preappiications, use a separate sheet to provide a summary description of this project. Item. Entry 12. List only the largest poiitica! entities air• ^cd (c .g.. SC.., ..vuuues, cities). 13. Self-explanatory Id. List the applicant's Congressional District and any District(s) affected by the program or project 15, Amount requested or to be contributed during the first funding /budget period by each contributor. Value of in kind contributions should be included on appropriate lines as applicable. If the action will result in a dollar change to an existing award, indicate onfi the amount of the change. For decreases. enclose the amounts in parentheses. If both basic and supplemental amounts are included, show breakdown on an attached sheet For multiple program funding, use totals and show breakdown using same categories as item 15. 16. Applicants should contact the State Single Point of Contact (SPOC) for Federal Executive Order 12372 to determine whether the application is subject to the State intergovernmental review process. 17. This question applies to the applicant organs zction, not the person who signs as the authorized representative. Categories of debt include delinquent audit disallowances. loans and taxes. 18. To be, signed by the authorized representative of the applicant. A copy of the governing body's authorization for you to sign this application as official representative must be on File in the applicant's office. (Certain Federal agencies may require that this authorization be submitted as partofthe application.) II - INTRODUCTION The Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds is the Primary document intended to provide the residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with an opportunity to review and comment upon the ways in which funds from the Community Development Block Grant (CUED) program are to be used to support neighborhood improvement activities throughout the City. This document establishes a comprehensive set of long -term goals and short-term strategies which will most effectively target these important resources to meet the community's needs. The Final Statement is specifically designed to encourage participation by all residents of the City in identifying the community's housing, community development, and public service needs and in evaluating the strategies which are proposed to meet these needs. Upon approval by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, City staff will incorporate the statement into the City's application for funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the CDBG program for fiscal year 1992 -93. THE COLMtUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM The CDBG program is funded by the federal government through the U.S. Department of HUD. The program provides federal funds directly to cities and counties for a variety of housing, community development, and public service activities. The amount of funds which may be received by each eligible City and County is determined by a mathematical formula which measures the community's population, the age of the housing stock, and extent of persons living in poverty. Each City and County decides for itself how the money can best be used to meet the unique needs of its residents. Within the guidelines established by the program, each City and County evaluates its own needs, then designs and operates activities to meet those needs. The primary goals of the CDBG program are to improve the living conditions and economic opportunities of lower income persons, to prevent and eliminate community blight and blighting influences, and to meet urgent needs for which no other resources can be found. A minimum of 70 percent of the benefits of the CDBG funded activities meet be directed to activities which assist lower income persons either by providing benefits and services directly to lower income persons, or by improving neighborhoods which are occupied primarily by lower income persons. L2^ IDH THE CDBG APPLICATION Each year, communities wishing to receive CDBG funds must provide to the U.S. Department. of Housing and Urban Development an application, along witi an evaluation of the community's needs, long -term goals, short -term objectives, and proposed activities for the coming year. T'ne application also includes several statements of policy regarding how CDBG funds will be used to minimize displacement of residents, provide relocation ben ±fits where necessary, and evaluate the need to receive additional community input amending is proposed activities. Finally, the application must also include a series of certifications by which the community agrees to meet the requirements of federal law in carrying out its CDBG funded activities. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN THE CDBG APPLICATION PROCESS in preparing the CDBG application, each community , required to establish a Citizen's Participation Plan that provides the public an opportunity to review and comment upon the proposed uses of CDBG funds. The Citizens' Participation Plan, for the City of 7ancho Cucamonga is included in this document. In accordance with the Citizens' Participation Plan, the CDBG program staff solicited ideas for projects to receive CDBG funding during the upcoming year. Letters were sent to all community groups and agencies which have previously submitted suggestions, as well as to all City departments. An advertisement was published in the local paper inviting additional suggestions. The City Council reviewed the Preliminary Statement at a public hearing on April 15, 1992. At that meeting, the City Council approved the Preliminary Statement and directed staff to prepare the Final Statement. A public hearing on the Final Statement of objectives and Projected Use of Funds is a required part of the Citizens' Participation Plan. Notices of the public hearing to be held on the Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds were published on May 1, 1992 in the local paper, one month before the City Council meeting date of June 3, 1992, and notices were posted in community locations ten days prior to the meeting. 44— 1G5 III - COM![OMITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN In order to integrate the projects and activities undertaken through the Community Development Block Grant (CDEG) program with other housing and community development activities undertaken by the City and to coordinate long -term goals and short -term objectives, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby adopts the following Community Development Plan. THE GENERAL PLAN The General Plan is the primary document establishing the goals and objectives of the nousing and community development projects and activities to be undertaken by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All projects and activities undertaken through the CDBG program are to be in compliance with the General Plan. In addition, in selecting the projects and activities to be undertaken through the CDBG program, the City will first consider those projects which most directly serve to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan. COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY The Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), which is prepared each year for submission to the D.S. Department of HUD, is the primary document establishing the goals and objectives of the housing development, mortgage and rental assistance, and residential rehabilitation activities to be undertaken by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The five year CHAS was prepared in compliance with the Housing Element of the General Plan. In developing and revising the CHAS, on an arnual basis, the City will first consider those projects which most directly serve to implement the goals and objectives of the Housing Element. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SPECIFIC PLANS The Specific Plans adopted by the Community Redevelopment Agency are the primary documents establishing the goals and objectives of the Community Redevelopment Agency funded activities to prevent and eliminate blight and blighting influences in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In selecting projects and activities to be undertaken through the CDBG program in lower income and Community Redevelopment Agency target areas, the City will first consider those projects which most directly serve to implement the goals and objectives of the Specific Plans. by �U� IV - STATEtffiR7 OF COlMR7ITY DEVEIMM" OBJECTIVES In order to establish long -term goals and objectives for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby adopts the following Statement of Comm nity Development Objectives: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES 1. To revitalize and stabilize deteriorating neighborhoods, to prevent and eliminate blight and blighting influences, and to eliminate conditions detrimental to the health, safety, and public welfare. 2. To upgrade the City's substandard rental and owner- occupied housing stock through various forms of financial assistance for residential rehabilitation. 3. To provide improvements to public areas and public facilities which make them more useful and attractive, including developing and improving parks and recreational facilities. 4. To fund public services which improve the quality of the living environment and complement physical development activities being conducted in the City. 5. To fund public services which improve the quality of life for lower income persons, including senior citizens, handicapped, and homeless persons. 6. To assist with the expansion of facilities and public services which improve the quality of life for senior citizens. 7. To provide incentives for the preservation of historic properties through the elimination of structural code deficiencies. 8. To provide information and affirmative support toward the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home of their choice in a suitable living environment. 9. To provide the administrative capacity to implement the City's MEG program, fair housing, and landlord /tenant mediation services, and to coordinate the research, planning, and implementation of General Plan and Housing Element revisions. �dl SPECIFIC COlLMUNITY DEVEDOPffENT NEEDS In order to provide for the development of specific activities in support of the goals and objectives described above, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby identifies the Following specific needs to be met through the CDBG program: Financial assistance for owners of single family residences occupied by lower income households to encourage housing rehabilitation is needed to improve the quality of housing affordable to such persons and to prevent the deterioration of the housing stock which otherwise might result from a lack of resources for housing maintenance available to owners of housing affordable to such households. The provision of such assistance also contributes to the City's general efforts to promote housing quality standards and eliminate structural code deficiencies citywide. 2. The provision of incentives for the rehabilitation of historic properties and the elimination of structural deficiencies is needed to prevent and eliminate blight, blighting influences, and conditions detrimental to public health and safety. 3. The continuation of the City's ongoing efforts to design and construct street and sidewalks needed to improve the living environments and prevent the deterioration Of the transportation infrastructure in low /moderate neighborhoods. 5. The provision of landlord /tenant mediation and fair housing services. 5. Provision of expanded recreational facilities serving low /moderate income areas and senior citizens. 6. Elimination of the blighting influence of graffiti from low /moderate income neighborhoods. 7. The provision of Public Service Activities to assist low /moderate income persons and those with special or urgent needs, including but not exclusive to, such activities as assistance, to the homeless, job services and referrals, and battered womens shelter facilities. 0. IC& V - PPDJWC USE OF FONDS _ ON -GOING PROGRAMS A. ADMINISTRATION Description: This program will provide for the continuing administration of the CDBG program, including activities to coordi na'ce the implementation of the CDBG program with the City's other community development and planning activities. Location: This program would provide for the administration of the CDBG oroaram citywi.de. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section. 570.206 of the CORO regulations. Benefit: This program provides for benefits to the persons and neighborhoods to be served by the following programs. National Objective: 570.208(d)(4) Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Proposed Funding: $ 92,450 Carry Over /Reprogram (Estimated): $ 17,750 Total: $110,206 B. HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description: The continuation of the provision of grants, amortized loans, and deferred loans to lower income occupants of single family residences, including mobile homes, as an incentive to maintain or upgrade the existing affordable housing stock which otherwise might fall into disrepair. There are three proposed components to the Housing Rehabilitation Program: 1. The Low-Interest Loan Program would provide amortized low- interest loans of up to $20,000 to owners of single - family residences occupied by lower income persons. VW 1 cj_1 National Objective: 2. The Deferred Loan Program would provide non- amcrtrzed loans of up to $15,000 to senior citizens, households headed by Project Funding: handicapped persons, and very -low income families who are owner - occupants of single-family residences. The loans (Estimate): would be due and payable upon sale of the home. $ 13,260 3. The Rome Rehabilitation Grant Program Total: would provide grants of op to $5,000 to lower income owner- occupants of single - STREET IMPROVEMENTS family residences. Location: All programs would be available citywide. Eligibility: Th1.s program is eligible under Section 570.202 of the CDBG Regulations. Benefit: All loans and grants will be used for the sidewalks for specific streets in rehabilitation of residences occupied by lower income households. National Objective: 570.208(.)(3) Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $214,032 Carry Over /Reprogram (Estimate): $112,329 Program Income: $ 13,260 Total: $339,621 C. SOUTHWEST CUCAMONGA STREET IMPROVEMENTS Description: This project involves the design and constriction of streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks for specific streets in the southwest Cucamonga neighborhood. Location: The following activities are proposed to be funded this year: 1. Design and construction of a waterline on the south side of 9th Street from Vinmar Avenue to Sierra Madre. 2. Construction along Vinmar Avenue from 9th Street to Chaffey Alley, 181x, I' , D. E. Eligibility: This protect is eligible under Section 570.201(c) of the CDBG Regulations. Benefit: The streets to be improved are located in an area where 51 percent or more of the residents are lower intone. National Objective: 570.20B(1)(ii) Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding; $147,130 Carry Over /Reprogram $199,616 (Estimated): Total: $346,745 SIDEWALK C-RINDING Description: This project involves the grinding of displaced sidewalks by trees. Location: The project that will be undertaken is approximately 500 scattered sites. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.201(c) of the CDBG regulations. Benefit: The sidewalks to be repaired are located in lower income areas. National Objective: Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $ 5,940 Carry over /Reprogram $11,424 (Estimated): Total: $17,364 WHEELCHAIR RAMPS Description: This project involves the retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate handicapped persons. The project will be done in three phases over three years. This is the second phase. Location: The project will be undertaken citywide. 111 F G. Eligibility: The project is eligible under Section 570.210(k). Benefit: The project will benefit the handicapped who are presumed by HOD to he low and moderate income persons. National Objective: 570,208(a)(i)(a). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $ 6,936 Carry Over /Reprogram $11,410 (Estimated): Total.: $18,346 GRAFFITI REMOVAL Description: This project involves the removal of graffiti from single - family residences and public properties. Location: The project will be implemented in the block grant target neighborhoods. Eligibility: The project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the CDBG regulations. Benefit: The project will eliminate blight causing influences from low /moderate income neighborhoods. National Objective: 570.208(b)(2). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $10,412 Carry Over /Reprogram $31,540 (Estimated): Total: $41,952 FAIR HOUSING Description: The City is required by CDBG regulations to provide this activity. Rancho Cucamonga contracts with the Inland Mediation Board to provide public education, mediation, counseling, and legal referral services to promote fair housing. +ABA 112-- Location: Services will be provided through the Inland Mediation Board, 420 North Lenon Avenue, Ontario, California 91764. Services will be available citywide. Eligibility: The project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the UDBG program. Benefit: The project will service a limited clientele, at least 51 percent of whom are low or moderate income persons. National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(b b d). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $8,476 H. LANDLORD /TENANT MEDIATION Description: This project will provide landlord /tenant dispute mediation services and provide information and referral to City residents. Location: Services will be provided through the Inland Mediation Board, 420 North Leman Avenue, Ontario, California 91764. Services will be available citywide, Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the CORD program. Benefit: This project will service a limited clientele, at least 51 percent of whom are lax or moderate income persons. National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(b s d). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: NEW PROGRAMS I. OLUrIMERS FOUNDATION Description: $7,628 This program will complement the City's Home Improvement Program by providing immediate service for emergency and small home repairs. The program will be available to low income and senior households. Repairs would include such items as minor electrical, plumbing, and roof patching. +1Y-� �� l Cost for material is limited to $100 per job, with a maxlmum of two visits per household allowed in a year. Allowance will also be made for emergency repairs involving health and safety items. With City approval, a one -time grant of up to $200 will he allowed. Services will be prcvided by the Oldtimers Location: Foundation, 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, California. Services will be available citywide. Eligibility: This pr0]ect is eligible under Section 570.202 of the CDBG program. Benefit: All grants will be used for the minor rehabilitation of residences Occupied by lower income households. National objective: 570.208(a)(3). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 $5,000 Project Funding: J. NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER REHABILITATION In addition to providing handicap Description: improvements, which were approved in the prior year, significant rehabilitation to the structure is required. Rehabilitation work will include re- roofing, installing new flooring, and painting the exterior. Funds previously allocated for design Of new improvements on the site will be re- allocated toward rehabilitation of the structure. Additional funds from this program year will be allocated to complete the improvements. Location: City of Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9791 Arrow Route. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.201(c). Benefit: The Center is located in a low income target area, CT21, SG3, though services are provided to eligible residents who live outside the target area. Primary users of �� l L. HOUSE OF RUIN Description: Provides shelter, programs, opportunity, and education for battered women and their children who are at -risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24 -hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24 -hour crisis intervention hotline, 24 -hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, children's programs, legal and social advocacy, as well as cosmunity education and r}3° 15' the :.enter are senior citizens with numerous activities benefiting low income individuals and families. National Objective: 570.208(a)(2J(i)(a) Limited clientele. Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $ 6,410 Carry over /Reprogram $67,777 (Estimated): Total: $74,187 K. FAIR HOUSING TESTING Description: The purpose of this program is to test alleged discrimination cases and to provide back -up to Federal and State enforcement departments. Inland Mediation will hire and train appropriate staff. This provides a complement to the City's Fair Housing program. Location: Services will he provided through the Inland Mediation Board, 420 North Lemon Avenue, Ontario, California 91764. The program will be implemented citywide. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the CDBG regulations. Benefit: This project will serve a limited clientele, at least 51 percent of whom are low, or moderate income persona. National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(d). Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $2,814 L. HOUSE OF RUIN Description: Provides shelter, programs, opportunity, and education for battered women and their children who are at -risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24 -hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24 -hour crisis intervention hotline, 24 -hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, children's programs, legal and social advocacy, as well as cosmunity education and r}3° 15' violence prevention programs. Funds remaining from the Senior_ Shared program from the 1989-90 and 1990 -91 fiscal years, $2,561 wi 11 be reprogrammed for this project. Location: Services are provided by the House of Ruth, P.O. Box 457, Claremont, California 91711. Services are available on an as needed ba <as to Rancho Cucamonga residents. Eligibility: The project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the CDBG regulations. Benefit: The project will serve a limited clientele who are presumed to be low income due to the nature of their circumstance. National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(a) Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $2,000 Carry over /Reprogram $2,561 (Estimated): (Reprogram from Sr. Share) Total: M. HOMELESS OUTREACH $4,561 Description: The project will provide assistance to persons who are or are at -risk of becoming homeless. A variety of services are provided including such things as clothing, personal grooming, identification acquisition, shelter vouchers or referrals, bus tokens, drug and alcohol education, literacy classes, food and nutrition classes, etc. Location: Services will be provided through the Homeless Outreach and Referral Program, 122 S. Vine Street, Ontario, California 91762. Services will be available on an as needed basis to Rancho Cucamonga residents. Eligibility: This project is eligible under Section 570.201(e) of the CDBG regulations. Benefit: This project will serve a limited clientele who are presumed to be low income by the nature of their situation. �1� National Objective: 570.208(a)(2)(i)(a). Fiscal Year 1992-93 Project Funding: $10,000 N. CCNTINGENCV Description: This amount, which represents 5.7 percent of the grant amount, is being held in order to cover any potential cost overruns or it may be reprogrammed into the proposed job center pilot program. There are a significant number of issues that need to be resolved before final, determination can be made regarding the pilot program although it is hoped that the matter will be resolved by June. Location: The funds could be available for use in any of the programs discussed above. Fiscal Year 1992 -93 Project Funding: $31,770 �i1 VI - POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO PLOOOPLAINS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES Jnder. Federal Executive Order, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is required to protect floodplains and to reduce the risk of losses from floods by not conducting, supporting, or allowing activities to take place in floodplains unless the activities constitute the only practical alternatives to meeting community needs. Although most of the water courses in the City have been channeled to reduce flood hazards, there are some areas which are potentially subject to flooding in a 100-year flood. As indicated on the map attached as Figure 1, several of the proposed activities are to be undertaken in floodplain areas at -risk for a 100 -year flood. These activities are designed to alleviate the deterioration of public and private property already located in the floodplain. Therefore, these activities do not directly or indirectly support development within the floodplain. Staff of the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has assessed the long- and short -term risks of undertaking the activities within the floodplains and has assessed mitigation measures which may be included in the design of the activities. Public notice of the intention to undertake activities within the floodplain was published in the local newspaper to provide citizens the opportunity to comment upon the activities. Notices were also provided to interested public agencies. SOUTHWEST CUCAMONGA STREET IMPROVEMENTS In previous years, staff considered alternatives to providing public improvements in areas of Southwest Cucamonga located in identified flood hazard zones. All street improvements proposed for funding through the 1992 -93 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) have previously been reviewed and approved by the City Council. The Council has previously made a finding that the street Improvement activities which are proposed for the 1992 -93 CDBG program are the most practical and desirable alternatives, and that adequate mitigation measures have been identified and designed into the projects. The design, location, and size of the projects have not changed subsequent to the finding; therefore, no new finding is required. HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION INCENTIVES The Council has also made a previous finding that the Home Improvement Program and Historic Preservation Incentives Program are the most practical and desirable alternatives and that adequate mitigation measures have been identified and designed into the projects. Included as a part of the Home Improvement Program is the newly funded minor emergency repair grant program. Adding additional funding to these ongoing programs and the new emergency repair program requires a new finding. (Although no new funding is proposed for Historic Preservation for the 1992 -93 fiscal year.) ✓W�r gig Staff considered alternatives to incertaxing these activities in the floodplain areas and found them impractical and undesirable. One alternative would be to exclude properties in these areas from the programs. This would leave residences in these areas which are occupied by lower income persons unprotected from the deterioration which may otherwise result from the deferred maintenance likely to occur where financial assistance for home improvements is unavailable. Lxcloding historic properties from the program would similarly fail to protect such properties. The other alternative, removing the structures from the floodplain, is clearly impractical. In order to mitigate flood hazard impacts for structures which are to be rehabilitated under these programs, the City may require that owners of properties located in flood hazard areas show evidence of federal flood insurance coverage before rehabilitation assistance is provided. FINDING In order to approve operating the House Rehabilitation Program, including the minor emergency repair program, and Historic Preservation Incentives Program within the flaodplain the City Council must find that: It is necessary to undertake the activities in the floodplain in older to protect residences occupied by lower income persons and historic properties from the deterioration which may otherwise result from the deferred maintenance likely to occur where financial assistance for repairs and improvements is unavailable. 2. Adequate measures designed to mitigate the risk of property loss which may result from undertaking the activities have been identified and included in the operation of the activities. The activities conform to applicable state and regional floodplain management standards. 41 7 l q VII - STATEMENTS OF POLICY A. CITIZEN'S PARTICIPATION PLAN The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of its residents in the process of identifying projects for funding through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The City will, in conducting the CDBG program, follow this Citizens' Participation Plan. Outreach. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages citizen participation; with a particular emphasis on participation by persons of low and moderate income and residents of neighborhoods which are experiencing physical deterioration. In order to reach as many residents and community groups as possible, letters will be sent to community organizations and individuals who have participated in the program or suggested projects in recent years. In addition, a display advertisement will be published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin at least one month prior to considerat_on of the preliminary statement. 2. Notice. The City of Rancho Cucamonga provides citizens with advance notice of all meetings related to the MEG program and makes copies of all related materials available for public review as soon as notice is given. Notice of the hearing on the Preliminary statement of Community Development Objectives will be published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper at least 10 days prior to the hearing. 3. Technical Assistance. The City will publish the names and telephone numbers of staff familiar with the CDBG program who are available to answer questions and help residents and community groups package a proposal. 4. Public Near ings. The City of Rancho Cucamonga uses public hearings to obtain citizens' views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the program. A hearing is held on the Preliminary Statement of Community Development Objectives at which the City's housing and community development needs are reviewed, past policies and programs are discussed, and each proposed project is explained. A preliminary selection of objectives and programs is then made and published for public review and comment. The hearing on the final grant application is held a month later. All hearings are duly noticed. Agendas and staff reports are available in advance. The meetings are held at City Hall, which is fully accessible to the handicapped. -Ism 7,' 5. Lanquage Accessibility. Several neighborhoods have substantial hispanic populations. At meetings where it is likely that the attendees will not be bilingual, the City will provide an interpreter to ensure that residents can understand and participate in the procedures. 6. Responsiveness. Once projects have been funded and are under way, the City is committed to ensuring the satisfactory execution of each project. Staff provides a timely response to all written complaints, usually within 15 working days. B. RELOCATION POLICY Recent changes in the regulations governing the expenditure of CDBG funds require that the City establish a policy governing the provision of relocation assistance to any family, individual, business, non - profit organization, or farm that results from implementation of its CDBG programs. It is the policy of the City to avoid displacement of all families, individuals, businesses, non - profit organization, or farms in carrying out its CDBG programs. No displacement is expected to result from the activities proposed for the 1992--83 program year. However, in the event that operation of any of the CDBG funded activities results in the voluntary or involuntary displacement of any family, individual, business, non- profit organization, or farm (whether owner or renter), the City will provide relocation assistance in accordance with the standards and guidelines set forth in the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act, Section 7260 (et seq.) of the State of California Government Code (Title 25, Chapter 6) and the guidelines issued by the State of California Department. of Housing and Community Development, as applicable. The City will meet its relocation responsibilities through the use of its staff and consultants, supplemented by assistance from local realtors, social agencies, and civic organizations. It is the City's objective that all displaces be relocated with a minimum of hardship in accommodations which are decent, safe, sanitary, and suitable to their individual needs; located in areas not less desirable than their current location in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities; and reasonably accessible to their customers or places of employment and priced within their financial means. The City will handle those cases requiring relocation which result from implementation of CDBG activities on an individual case -by- case manner. Services provided to eligible displacees chall include but not be limited to: o Providing information on project activities, rights, benefits, and options open to them. 6P0� 122, o Maintaining liaison between displacees and agencies of firms with resources to assist them (e. g�, ^C ha tuber of Commerce, Small Business Administration, Office of Local Economic Development, lending institutions, realtors, etc.). o Locating, inspecting, evaluating, or stimulating the production of accommodations to meet the needs of all displacees. o Assisting displacees in obtaining financing. o Assisting displacees in securing priority consideration for rental assistance, public housing, or other housing assistance activities. o Making referrals to appropriate social, comunity, and welfare agencies. o Keeping records, maintaining files, and coordinating all relocation activities. o Providing all families, individuals, businesses, institutions, and farms which are displaced by CDBG funded activities with written notice of this policy, the types of services available to them, and the amount of relocation assistance for which they may be eligible. (Payments will be in the amounts established by State and Federal Guidelines.) City staff and consultants will be available to answer questions and provide information and, by their early involvement, to see that relocation proceeds with a minimum of hardship. C. RESIDENTIAL ANTI - DISPLACEMENT PLAN Section 104 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 requires each grantee to adopt, make public, and certify that it is following a residential anti - displacement plan providing one -for- one replacement units in cases where residential units are demolished as a consequence of an activity funded through the CDBG program, The plan must include steps that will be taken to minimize the displacement of persons from their homes resulting from any activity funded under the CDBG program. The plan must include steps that will be taken to minimize the displacement of persons from their homes resulting from any activity funded under the CDBG program. It is not anticipated that any demolition of residential structures will occur as a result of any of the activities proposed to be undertaken during the 1992 -93 program year. However, in accordance with the Act, the City of Rancho Cucamonga establishes this Residential Anti - Displacement Plan. . M_ 1,2 1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga will replace all occupied and vacant occupiable lower income dwelling units demolished or converted to a use other than as Sower income housing as a direct result of activities assisted with funds provided under the housing and Community Development Oct of 1974, as amended, and as described in 24 CFR 577.606(b)(1). 2. All replacement housing will be provided within three _years of the commencement of the demolition or rehabilitation relating to conversion. 3. Before obligating or expending funds that will directly result in such demolition or conversion, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will make public and submit to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development the following information in writing: a. A description of the proposed activity. b. The general location on a map and the approximate number of dwelling units by number of bedrooms that will be demolished or converted to a use other than as lower income housing as a direct result of the proposed activity. c. A time schedule for the commencement and completion of the demolition or conversion. d. The general location on a map and approximate number of dwelling units by number of bedrooms that wi.11 be provided as replacement dwelling units. e. The source of funding and a time schedule for the provision of replacement dwelling units. f. The basis for concluding that each replacement dwelling unit will remain a lower income dwelling unit for at least ten years from the date of initial occupancy. D. CRITERIA FOR SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE Federal regulations for the CDBG program require the City to notify affected citizens and provide them the opportunity to comment on any proposed activity which is added, deleted, or substantially changed in terms of purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries following the submission of the Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds to the V.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The regulations require the City to adopt and make public its definition of "substantial change." The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall consider a "substantial change" to have occurred under the following circumstances: bd2-- l'L� 1. The amount to be allocated to any activity is proposed to be increased or decreased from the amount in the Final Statement by more than 25 percent. 2. The location of the activity, target area, or eligibility criteria of the program, is changed from that described in the Final Statement. 3. An activity not included in the Final Statement is proposed for funding. 4. An activity included in the Final Statement is proposed for elimination or cessation. Should the City Council consider a substantial change in any CDB funded activity, the public will be notified and provided an opportunity to comment upon the proposed change. {i3" 175- VIII — CERTIFICATIONS _n accordance with the Housing and Cormun:ty Development Act of 1974, as amended, and with 24 CFA 570.303 of tic. Commmi *_y Develooment Block Grant (CDBG) regulations, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certifies that: (a) It possesses legal authority to make a grant submission and to execute a community development and housing program. (b) She City Council has duly adopted a resolution authorizing the Mayor to submit the final statement and amendments, thereto, and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and d:'recting and authorizing the Mayor to act in connection with the submission of the final statement and to provide such additional information as may be required. (c) Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, it has: Met the citizen participation requirements of 570.301(b). 2. Prepared its Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds in accordance with 570.301(c) and made the Final Statement available to the public. (d) It is following a Detailed Citizen Participation Plan which: 1. Provides for and encourages citizen participation, with particular emphasis on participation by persons of low and moderate income who are residents of slum and blighted areas and of areas in which funds are proposed to be used and provides for participation of residents in Low and moderate income neighborhoods as defined by the City; 2. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to local meetings, information, and records relating to the grantee's proposed use of funds, as required by the regulations of the Secretary of HUD and relating to the actual use of funds under the Act; 3. Provides for technical assistance to groups representative of persons of low and moderate income that request such assistance in developing proposals with the level and type of assistance to be determined by the grantee; 4. Provides for public hearings to obtain citizen views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the community development program, including at least the development of needs, the review of proposed activities, eflJ—� 17 and review of program performance, which hearings shall be held after adequate notice, at times and locations convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries, and with accommodation for the handicapped: 5. Provides for a timely written answer to written couplaints and grievances, within 15 working days where practicable; and 6. Identifies how t).e needs of non - English sneaking residents will be met in the case of public hearings where a significant number of non - English speaking residents can be reasonably expected to participate. (e) The grant will be. conducted and administered in compliance with: 1. 'Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88- 352, 42 U.S.C. #2000d et seg.). 2. The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 -20). (f) It will affirmatively further fair housing. (g) It has developed its Final Statement of Projected Use of Funds no as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; (the Final Statement of Projected Use of Funds may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community and other financial resources are nor, available); except that the aggregate use of CDBG funds received under Section 106 of the Act, and if applicable, under Section 108 of the Act, during the 1992 -93 program year, shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less than 70 percent of such funds are used for activities that benefit such persons during such period. (hl It has developed a community development plan, for the period specified in paragraph (g) above, that identifies community development and housing needs and specifics both short- and long -term community development objectives that have been developed in accordance with the primary objective and requirements of the Act. (1) It is following a current comprehensive housing affordability strategy (CHAS) which has been approved by HUD pursuant to 570.306 and Part 91, and that any housing activities to be assisted with CDBG funds will be consistent with the CHAS. b1 S t7 1 (j) It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted in whole or in part with funds provided under Section 106 of the Act or with amounts resulting from a guarantee under Section 108 of the Act by assessing anv amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessments made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements, unless: 1. Funds received under Section 106 of the Act are used to pay the proportion of such fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of such public improvements that are financed from revenue sources other than under Title I of the Act; or 2. For purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of moderate income, the grantee certifies to the Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received under Section 106 of the Act to comply with the requirements of subparagraph (1) above. iX) It's notification, inspection, testing, and abatement procedures concerning lead -based paint will comply with 570.608. (1) It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as required under 570.606(a) and Federal implementing requ lationsl the requirements in 570.606(b) governing residential anti - displacement and relocation assistance plan under Section 104(d) of the Act (including a certification that the grantee is following such a plan); the relocation requirements of 570.606(c) governing displacement subject to Section 104(X) of the Act; and the relocation requirements of 570.606(d) governing optional relocation assistance under Section 105(a)(11) of the Act. (m) It has adopted and is enforcing: A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non - violent civil rights demonstrations; and A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non- violent civil rights demonstration within its jurisdiction; �E6 /n (n) To the best of its knowledge and belief; No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement: 2. if any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions) and 3. It will require that the language of paragraph (n) of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. (o) it will or will continue to provide a drug -free workplace by: 1. publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition. Establishing a drug -free awareness program to inform employees about; a. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; b. The City's policy of maintaining a drug -free workplace; C. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and enployee assistance programs; and t27^ , d. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace. 3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1. 4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will: a. abide by the terms of the statement; and b. notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction. 5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant: 6. Taking one of the following actions, within thirty calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted. (a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a federal, state or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency, 7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. B. The grantee may insert in the space provided below, the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: t% �3D Place of Performance: Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 Check X if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here; and (p) It will comply with the other provisions of the Act and with other applicable laws. �3� RESOLUTION NO. j - 17, . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF COKW17NITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR PROGRAM YEAR 1992 -93. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, is an Entitlement City under the reg,:lations governing the Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, notice of the availability of funds for eligible projects was published in The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper and posted in community locations; and WHEREAS, the City staff has received proposals for projects and programs from various organizations; and WHEREAS, on April 15, 1992, the City Council heard public testimony and received all public input regarding the City's Community Development Block Grant Program for the 1992 -93 fiscal years and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the potential environmental impacts of each project and has reviewed all possible alternatives and mitigation measures included in each; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves and takes the following actions: 1. Adopt the Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds (Final Statement) for program year 1992 -93 and make all findings, determinations, and certifications, and adopt all policies therein; and 2. Select the following projects and programs to be funded out of the City's 1992 -93 Community Development Block Grant award: Project /Program Amount Administration $ 92,450 SW Cncamonga Streets 147,130 Sidewalk Grinding 5,940 Wheel Chair Ramps 6,936 Home Improvement 227,292+ Oldtimers Foundation 5,000 Graffiti Removal 10,412 Fair Housing 8,476 Landlord/Tenant 7,628 i .32 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. FINAL STATEMENT OF CDBG 1992 -93 June 3, 1992 Page 2 Project /Program Amount Neighborhood Center 6,410 Fair Housing Testing 2,814 House of Ruth 4,561 ($2,561 reprogram from Sr. Share) Homeless Outreach 10,000 Contingency 31,770 Total $566,819 These totals include an estimated $13,260 in program income. Program income is received from repayment of deferred loans made from participants of the Home Improvement Program. Funds received will continue to be used to provide housing rehabilitation for lower income single family homeowners. The amount is an approximation of what might be received. Income received will not be known until the end of the fiscal year on June 30, 1992. 3. Determine that the proposed projects are the most environmentally desirable and that adequate mitigation has been included in each to avoid significant environmental impacts under the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA)1 and 4. Determine that all of the proposed projects are exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines); and 5. Authorize the Mayor to sign the application for the City's program year 1992 -93 Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Allocation, to submit the Final Statement and Amendments thereto, and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and to act in connection with the submission of the Final Statement and to provide such additional information as may he required. 133 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT i -, r5 DATE: June 3, 1992 TJ: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, APCP, City Manager :ROM: Brad Puller, City Planner BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE - Aop eal of the Planning Commission's denial of a request to expand the hours of operation on Fridays for an existing 103,552 square _foot indoor wholesale /retail conmiercial use located within the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229- 262 -28. RECONNENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denial of the expansion of hours for Conditional Use Par.ait 91 -03 through adoption of the attached Resolution. DACEGIDI/tlD: On June 19, 1991, the City Council approved Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 91 -03 to conditionally permit Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial Uses within the industrial area. On June 27, 1991, the Planning Commission considered a request to allow the first such use, Carnival Malls, to locate within an existing research, and development center. During the public hearing, the Planning Commission expressed concern about the proposed hours of operation and potential on -site parking conflicts with other site users. After much discussion, the Commission was able to make the findings to support the project based on the fact that there was going to be no impacts to existing and future site users due to off -peak hours of operation for the indoor wholesale /retail commercial use. Finally, the proposal was consistent with the spirit and intent of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 91 -03. To ensure compatibility of the on -site uses, the use was limited to the following hours of operation: Monday through Friday - 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Incidental stacking of merchandise for vendors and office hours for the management team - Not Open to the Public) Friday 5:00 P.M. - 9:00 P.M. Retail Sales Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Retail Sales Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Retail Sales CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE June 3, 1992 Page 2 Following the opening of the Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial use on November 1, 1991, the applicant submitted a modification request on December 11, 1991. The modification to Condit -onal Use Permit 91 -C3 requested a-, expansion of permitted uses, operation on holidays, and the expansion of hours of operation on Fridays (referred to as Items, A, B, and C within the attached reports). On April 8, 1992, after conducting a public hearing, the Commission conditionally approved the applicant's request to expand the uses and hours of operation during holidays (Parts A and B), but dented the applicant's request to expand the hours of operation to include Fridays, from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The Commission found that they could not support the applicant's request because of potential negative impacts to existing and future site users. ANALYSIS: In addition to compatibility with surrounding land uses, the Commission could not support the project because of parking issues. The Development Code requirement for the indoor wholesale /retail. commnercial use is 1 parking space per 100 square feet. Alternatively, as part of the Conditional Use Permit review, the Planning Commission may allow 1 space per 150 square feet subject to the submittal and review of a Parking study. The parking study submitted by the applicant demonstrated that adequate parking facilities would exist for the proposed use at a parking ratio of 1 space per 150 square feet on weekends only (See Exhibit "I"). A total of 691 parking stalls would be required for the indoor wholesale. /retail commercial use. The total amount of parking required for the entire industrial center is 875 parkinq stalls. A total of 760 stalls have been provided which means there would be a deficit of 119 parking stalls with all uses in operation at the same time on weekdays. Because the applicant proposed to operate on weekends only, the Commission was assured there would be no narking impacts to other tenants within the center and therefore, were consistent with the Development Code requirements. In addition to the above information in the parking study, additional information on a shared parking study for the entire shopping center was provided. The Development Code standards assume a flat peak parking requirement in direct contrast to a shared parking study. with information provided by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), the study sought to demonstrate that adequate parking would exist for all users on weekdays as well as weekends. These figures, under the shared parking concept, assume that the uses within the industrial center operate with differing peak hour demands. The reasoning being that with differing peak hour demand, parking requirements would be. less than those identified within the Development Code. The Planning Commission rejected the use of shared parking in this situation because (1) most of the leaseable space is vacant making it difficult to define the types of uses and their parking needs: and (2) the indoor wholesale /retail commercial use is a "new animal" for which ULI has no available parking data. 135- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE June 3, 1992 _age 3 As a result_ of the findings identified above, the Planning Commission denied the applicant's request to expand the hours of operation to include .Fridays. Copies of the Planning Commission Staff Reports and Minutes are attached. The Commission then - ontinued tic item to the April 22, 1952 meeting and adonted a Resolution of Denial at said hearing. Respect submitt / Brad Du r City Planner BL':ALH:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "I" Exhibit "J" Applicant's Letter of Appeal Site Plan Staff Report, April 22, 1992 Resolution of Denial Draft Minutes, April 22, 1992 Staff Report April 8o 1992 Minutes April 8, 1992 Staff Report, March 25, 1992 Parking Requirements Applicants Original Modification Letter 1Yp T A � aiwqut pat PMAY 4 1992 �- arr:.easam may 1. .> Brad Bulier: Crty Planner Box Rancho Curamnnaa. Caiifornia 9i /3U „ea_ mr. Bolter We are spree I ing the Planning Department of the City of Rancno Cucamonga .recision adopted April 22. 1992 for the taiiowjrg reasons. 1; It l.s correct that we originally asked for IKEEKEND USE, However we also asked for FRIDAY NIGHTS and were approved Ior USE from PN to 9:UU FM. 2) Prior to our approval, but AFTER OUR APPLICATION WAS FILED, a 'SHARED PARKING STUDY" -a s required by the PLANNING COMMISSION as additional information for the approval of our CUP during oar FIRST HEARING. When, that SHARED PARKING STUDY" was completed it showed THAT WE COULD OPERATE UNDER CITY APPROVED REQUIREMENTS" during the ENTIRE WEEK with CONFLICT WITH THE OTHER USERS IN OUR CO ,r LEX" . At the time of our ORIGINAL CUP APPLIr CATION we were under the impression that under your EXISTING REQUIREMENTS we WOULD CONFLICT with the rest of the complex. When we found that we DID NOT CONFLICT, IT WAS "TOO LATE" to amend our CUP APPLICATION and START THE WHOLE PROCESS OVER AGAIN. Due to the Complex nature of our application and the necessary time delays needed to COLLECT the FULL INFORMATION, it put us under severe TIME PRESSURES from the OWNER or we WOULD HAVE REAPPLIED! That and a CLARIFICATION of our EXISTING CUP 1s why we are REAFPLING NOW! .1 Under Paragraph 2(d) & (e) of the DENIAL, the findings that It CONFLICTS with the OTHER SITE USERS ARE INCORRECT, 137 15XH' leer 1A�1 THIS 13 CONFIRMED BY: (a) THE ORIGINAL SHARED PARKING STUDY", prepared by Austin - Founts, Which Was the basis OS Our ORIGINAL APPROVAL for our CUP. This SHOWS IT DOES NOT CONFLICT "WHILE EVEN ALLOWING FOR AN ADDITIONAL lUS RESERVE FACTOR "! (b) "THE FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS of RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S "OWN" PLANNING STAFF. )SEE STAFF REPORT)! 4) If the conditions under a(d) & (e) are INCORRECT. as they are, than the CONCLUSIONS under Paragraph 3 of the DENIAL are INCORRECT and SHOULD BE REVERSED and our NEW APPLICATION, as "RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING STAFF" be "APPROVED"! 3i C6 rely, J tes P g r e arn'vat Malls JRP /la } �g ie1? ";Or �� I £Y441alT "A'.'Z lecs-mter 1Q, .'i'ii Au na -Li- a Hernandez. Assistant Planner ianning epartment itv of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, Calitornia � u JU Dear Anna -Lisa: After carstul consideration of our operation and Its imract on tntm City of Rancho Cucamonga. Carnival Malls is applying to the r fanning epartment o y � the of Rancho Cucamonga for a MODIFICATION of its existino CUP at 11SJU SIXTH Street. are requesting the �o.iowing inclusion of Personal Service Sales in addition to New Froducts Sales. These Personal Services typically include. nut are not limited to travel agencies, mortgage brokers, real estate sales, personal care, ; beauty or nail care photography studios and other activities typical of a personal service nature. Z; Extention of our HOURS of OPERATION to include ALL LEGAL HOLIDAYS, such as; NEW YEARS DAY, VALENTINE'S DAY, LINCOLN'S 8 WASHINHTON'S BIRTHDAY, ST. PATRICK'S DAY, ARMED FORCES DAY, MEMORIAL DAY, FLAG DAY, INDEPENDENCE DAY, LABOR DAY. COLUMBUS DAY. UNITED NATION'S DAY, HALLOWEEN, VETERANS DAY. THANKSGIVING, the day after THANKSGIVING and the week before CHRISTMAS. J; Extention of our HOURS of Operation on FRIDAYS to Start at m ou AM. instead of S:UU PM, and End at 8:0U PM. We are requesting this for the following reasons: 11 Service Sales are a PERMITTED USE in our LAND USE SUB -AREA. It is also a PERMITTED USE in the ADJACENT OFFICE BUILDING on Site. It will be a MINOR portion of the Total Use of the Vendors in our facility. In most other cities it is a PERMITTED COMMERCIAL USE. It is also part of the EXISTING USE in the MAJOR MALLS In the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Z; Extention of Hours during HOLIDAYS means EXISTING TENANTS In the other buildings on site, during those Holidays, WILL BE OFF. Since the surrounding area is INDUSTRIAL EVEN LESS TRAFFIC IMPACT will occur on these Holdays for the same reason. There should be NO TRAFFIC problem during the WEER BEFORE CHRISTMAS in that this is a period when people take Vacations and business in our area is generally light. ALL COMPARABLE FACILITIES CHARGE "EXTRA RENTAL" which means some of our Tenants Will choose NOT to STAY OPEN and some will be tied up in FULL TIME JOBS ELSEWHERE. This will REDUCE ou TOTAL occupancy, customer Lrattic and overall parking neess. I� ExN re IT 1/4 "3 31 PARKING STUDIES DONE t ON COMPARABLE FACILITIES ) IN OUR INITIAL PARKING STUDY, SHOW THAT FRIDAY IS A "LIGHT RETAIL DAY ". We are a FAMILY FACILITY and FRIDAY is not a FAMILY SHOPPING DAY. In addition. a number of our TENANTS are EMPLOYED ELSEWHERE and DO NOT OPEN THEIR STORE ON FRIDAYS. This is the reason that FRIDAYS are a "LIGHT RETAIL DAY" in all comparable facilities. As per our SHARED PARKING STUDY done for the CUP. TABLE I. ALTERNATE #'. WEEKDAY PARKING, THE REPORT SHOWS THAT "WE CAN SAFELY OPERATE EVEN DURING THIS FRIDAY TIME PERIOD ". Ot ALL the requirements for parking availability the Limits under ALTERNATE F3 are the most RESTRICTIVE, HOWEVER FOR THE TIME PERIOD REQUESTED WE MEET EVEN THOSE REQUIREMENTS. IT IS NOT OUR INTENT TO IMPLEMENT ALL THE REQUESTS OF THIS MODIFICATION. HOWEVER, WE DO NOT EXPECT TO MODIFY OUR CUP ON A YEARLY BASIS SO WE ARE MAKING "ALL" OUR REQUESTS FOR THE FUTURE NOW! Thank you again for your kind help. Sincerely, ,James Page for Carnival Malls JRP /la 14b E >4+±1 a lT '�4'i 4 Anti, 14. 133:; Mr. Brad Buii'.. _ r_anner F!annin.g Department Cltv Of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130 Dear Mr. Buller; in regards to the Planning COmmisslor action on April Uth 1992, MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -UJ a number or items need clarification. A. We have requested exnansion of our hours to include FRIDAYS. It is believed that that is a PROFITABLE move on our part. That is Just not the case. CARNIVAL INDOOR STREET FAIRE insures ONLY COST BY EXPANDING TO FRIDAY. What occured WAS OUR TENANTS, residents of RANCHO CUCAMONGA requested that they be allowed to operate on FRIDAY as well as SATURDAY & SUNDAY. The reason that it is important to them is that a number of them LOST THEIR JOBS. jap When WE appe lied for FRIDAY NIGHT, SATURDAY & SUNDAY in our original application we felt as we do now that economically that was'Vto OUR BENEFIT. We still believe SO; However. wno knew the present depression was at hand. Retailers need help today, especially ours who are Just starting out and can't Pay HIGH RENTS. We nave done our part by reducing rents by over bUE to help them. As we stated In the meeting; "OUR HOURS OF OPERATION "DO NOT" INCLUDE ANY FRIDAY HOURS OF OPERATION, PRESENTLY, EVEN THOUGH PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. If we were looking to expand our operation why did wi CANCEL FRIDAY NIGHT OPERATIONY EVERY HOUR WE ARE OPEN COSTS US MONEY. WHAT PERSONAL MOTIVATION DO WE HAVE TO EXPAND OUR HOURS': TO LOSE MORE MONEY Starf acknowledges that we can operate with no problems regarding traffic and parking. It is acknowledged that we can be stopped from expanding to other days. Understand we are requesting NOT ON OUR BEHALF, but on bahalf of your RESIDENTS to allow a Friday Weekday Operation ONLY. We are prepared to enter Into any type of agreement you wish to Insure our compliance. Your positive action is not beneficial to us, but can go along way to helping those People who are trying to economically survive. Please look into your hearts and help them! Sincerely, lyl James Page WESTICOR INCORP, it's President Mach .39i Mr. Alex vicencio. Civi: Engineer P. . BOX GU/ Rancho Cucamonga. California 91129 Lear Mr. vicencio; We are applying to the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for permission to use the Existing Facilities located at 1153U SIXTH Street as a RETAIL MALL for weekend use. The following is a report on Its impact on traffic and parking for the property. Our Development, a MINI -MALL is a commercial use. AS such, it best fits under Category / of your "LAND USE TRIP PATE SUMMARY ". This is described as "REGIONAL COMMERCIAL". Tne Average Customer Is coming tar Entertainment and shopping. The availability of merchandise from APPROXIMATELY 2UU SMALL STORES 1 AVERAGE SIZE 2UU - 4UU sq. it.). With the USE of KIDDY RIDES and TELEVISION, lncludir,g both Sporting Events. for Adults, and Cartoons for the children a PROLONGED stay at our MALL will occur for the FAMILY. It is quite possible that our TRUE A.D.T. will he more likely that at a GOLF COURSE, HEALTH CLUB or PARK because or the ACTUAL STAY OF OUR CUSTOMER; certainly more like a REGIONAL MALL because of Its Entertainment Facilities. Our HOURS of OPERATION are 3:PM - 9:FM FRIDAY, IU:AM - e:PM SATURDAY and lU:AM - 6:PM SUNDAY. PHASE 1, has SU,000 sq. ft. GROSS and '16,000 sq. it. of RETAIL SALES SPACE. PHASE Z has 103,124 sq. ft. of GROSS SPACE and ..�,UUU sq. it. of RETAIL SALES SPACE. PHASE 2 applies to the ENTIRE OPERATION. Our Advertising is geared to the INLAND EMPIRE AREA. We are using primarily RADIO and direct mail. The advertising marketing information shows OUR CUSTOMERS will come from the entire surrounding MARKET AREA. This means our MAIN traffic corridors are along the 1U & 1S FREEWAYS, exiting at HAVEN, MILLIKEN 6 4th STREET'S and along 6th Street, running both East & West. SECONDARY or LOCAL traffic from the East will take FOOTHILL. ARROW HIGI(WAY and 4th STREETS West only slightly impacting the area. However, we have the UNIQUE. ABILITY TO DIRECT TRAFFIC ACCESS TO OUR SITE. Our advertising can be varied so that we CAN EDUCATE the CUSTOMER as to WHAT ROUTES to TAKE to ACCESS OUR `',L_ EYE IBr-( iAriG SITE. We can therefore CHANGE or MITIGATE TRAFFIC PATTERNS THROUGH OUR ADVERTISING to SUIT CHANGING TRAFFIC DEMANDS. That Is UNIQUE to any business. Our traffic will occur ON WEEKENDS, when BUSINESS TRIES on these corridors are either vastly reduced or NON EXISTENT. We should therefore add little or none to the OVERALL TRAFFIC PATTERNS and even FALL WELL UNDER THE PROJECTED "WEEKLY" TRAFFIC STUDIES for our IMMEDIATE area. Our area Is NOT RESIDENTIAL in nature and was PLANNED for and has SUPERIOR TRAFFIC CIRCULATION as well as "OFFSITE PARKING ". The RESIDENTIAL in the MARKET AREA Is ADEQUATELY REMOVED from this location. Within OUR MARKET AREA, this site, is located In a BUFFER AREA where traffic is DIRECTED TO THE FREEWAYS. By locating on this site we RAVE REMOVED the NEGATIVE TRAFFIC IMPACT our operation might cause in some OTHER RETAIL COMMERCIAL AREA and mitigate the WEEKLY BUSINESS TRAFFIC CONGESTION of over 100,UUU sq ft of space which, in the future, will never negatively Impact OUR AREA AGAIN. Sincerely, James Page Carnival Mails ENC: JRP /la V-13 ,I. JTGiBi1: "�';L�71�i I.ff�� 'U'1' "I" •�� I �i�ibil�l- `Illi'illl`I "Ill,�l'�1 ";� BUILDING' BUILO(NG I 2A 103.550 SO F J; x800 SO F* I, 4 fI BUILDING II BUILDING] 2B n I - ltl]0fl 5(1 F1 \ \\ 26 705 50 FT .� I � A.1 iLQnII,IIIQILII LlQ lll Il Ll LfILWIW Site viall " I O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA co PLANNING Q VISION iL �, I % �s2. ul I Y ur NANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 7� DATE: ;pril 22, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Huller, City Planner BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -D3 - JAMES PAGE - Resolution of Denial for a request to expand the hours of operation on Fridays for an existing 103,522 square foot indoor wholesale /retail commercial use located within the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -28. ABSTRACT: On April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission reviewed the applicant's request to expand the hours of operation to include Fridays from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m., within the existing Carnival Malls site. After reviewing staff's report and taking public testimony, the Planning Commission could not support the applicant's request due to potential cumulative parking and compatibility issues with other site users and directed staff to return with a Resolution of Denial at the next available Planning Commission Consent Calendar. Before you tonight is the requested Resolution of Denial.. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the applicant's request for hours of operation on Fridays through adoption of the attached Resolution of Denial. Resp ly sub Bra idle City Planner BB:ALH /ifs Attachment: Resolution of Denial N5 RESOLUTION `:O. i. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C:T OF RA:1CH0 CJ- .IMONGA, CAL:FORNIA, DENYING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91 -03, PART FOR THE EXPANSIOON OF THE HOURS OF O'PERATI'ON: 0:: FRIDAYS, LOCATED iN THE GENERAI, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING rINCINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229- 26-29. A. Recitals. !i) ,Tames Paue has filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 91 -03 as described in the title of this. ReFc bat ion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit modification request 1s referred to as "the appiication." (ii) On the 26th day of February 1992, and continued to the 25th day of March and the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of- Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on April 8, 1992. ;iii) On the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and staff's presentation and received public testimony. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for their meeting of April 22, 1992. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set Earth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on February 26, March 25, and April 8, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property Located at 11530 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.33 feet and is presently improved with three research and development buildings and 760 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General industrial. 1�1� f�Y-H ieiT "o" PLANNING COM2MISSID:1 RESDLLTIDN NO. ,„ -„ 11,00. D CUP 91 -03, PART C - JAM.ES PAGE April 22, 1992 Page 2 c) The Indoor Wholesale /Retail Conmerci_al Use is located within a General Industrial zone Subarea 11 of the industrial Area Specific Plan. The General industrial zone was intended to accommodate a wide range of light to tedium manufactureng and wholesale, storage and distribution uses. Typically, administrative office, professional, and indoor wholesale /retail commercial uses are not allowed to reduce potential land use conflicts. The primary finding in permitting the use to locate within the Research and Development Industrial Center was the fact that there would not be any conflict with the hours of operation of the general industrial users within the site with off- set hours of operation on weekends only. The ancillary nature of the indoor wholesale /retail commercial use on weekends only was found to be consistent with the original intent of the General Industrial zone. This proposal to expand the hours of operation directly conflicts with the intent of the General industrial zone of the Industrial Specific plan and would conflict with on -site business operations. (d) The original approval of the application was based on the fact that the application would operate during different hours of operation of other users within the center, thereby, minimizing all potential impacts to other current site and future businesses. With the current proposal, hours of operation on Fridays from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. would conflict with the hours of operation of other site users, and adversely impact those businesses. (e) The proposed hours of operation would conflict with the utilization of parking facilities for other users within the site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. fb) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4. eased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. N-1 6M151 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. j -- -- MOD. TO CUP 91 -03, PART C - JAMES PAGE April 22, 1992 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APR! -, 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RP1CHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the :ity of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and - regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April 1992, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ly6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting April 22, 1992 Chairman McNiel tailed the Regular Meeting of the rity of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman McNiel then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNrel, John Melcher, Peter Tolstoy, Wendy Vallette ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner; Barbara Rrall, Assistant Engineer; Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner; Scott Murphy, Associate Planner; Shelley Petrelli, Planning Division Secretary: Steve Ross, Assstant Planner ANNOUNCEMENTS Brad Buller, City Planner, suggested that Items G and I be discussed at the same time since they are related. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Melcher, seconded by Tolstoy, unanimously carried, to adopt the minutes of March 25, 1992. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Melcher, carried 4- 0 -0 -1, ( Vallette abstained) to adopt the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of April 2, 1992. 14 °I DRAFT EXMl E1'r "E FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY CONSENT CALENDAR A. MODIFTCA:IOR T CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - Sl MES PAGE - Resolution, of Dentall for a request to expand the hours of operation on Fridays for an existing 103,522 square foot indoor wholesale /reta!i commcr vial use located within the General Industrial Distri (Subarea 11) of the industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229- 262 -28. (Continued from April 8, 1992.) James Page, Carnival Malls, requested Item A to pulled for discussion.. Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner, gave a brief Summary of her nrevicus staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. James Page, Carnival Malls, 6221 Warner Dr., Los Angeles, stated he wished to address the Commission because he felt the Commission may have gotten the wrong inpression from the last meeting regarding the reasons why they had asked for expanded hours of operation on Fridays. He pointed out that it was the tenants who had asked for the expanded hours. He stated that the concept behind this na11 is to help the small business person get started. He commented that the City of Los Angeles is opposed to swap meets in their city, but they are now promoting this concept for the same reasons as Carnival Malls. With the current economic situation, he stated they are very concerned about what will happen to all the people being laid off from their jobs; his company stands ready to help by retraining these people. He remarked that facilities of this type are extremely important. He stated that their organization is similar to Fedco, which is not considered a swap meet, and Carnival Malls does not consider themselves a swap meet either. Chairman McNiel, asked why they were requesting Friday daytime hours when they are not utilizing Friday evening hours. Mr. Page replied that they voluntarily chose not to utilize evening hours on Fridays because it was not economically sound for the vendors. He stated that the vendors were requesting Friday daytime hours because more women shop by themselves on Fridays. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. He asked for comments from the Commission. Commissioner Melcher stated that the previous approval for this type of use at this location was based, in part, on the fact that the mall would be open during hours other businesses would be closed. He stated that the remainder of the project is vacant currently, but be was concerned that sufficient parking would not be available when the project becomes fully operational. He felt that, in spite of the applicant's sincere request, it would be inappropriate to allow this extension of operating hours because of the potential parking problems. I5,C) Planning Commission Minutes all•- April 22, 1992 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Ccr.,missioner Toistoy agreed with Com=. ssioner M.elcher, but he added it would nose a much 'larger problem than a conflict within the complex; it would Pose a conflict within the entire industrial area because of the additional traffic that would be caused by their weekday operations. Commcss.iorex Chitiea concurred with the co: —tints made by Commissioners Melcher and Toistoy. MOTION: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried 5 -0 -0, to adopt the Resolution of Denial. Motion rarriad by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, M7c1IEL, MELCHEP., TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried k 4 F 4 t B.�SIGN REVIEW 14407 -1 - LEWIS HOMES - The design review of bull e tions and detailed site plan for a previously approved ten ve trac consisting of 13 single family homes on 1.3 acres of Ian the Medium dential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) of a Terra Vista Pla Community, located on the west side of M.ountal ew Drive, south of Base , a Road - APN: 227 - 751 -15, C. DESIGN REVIEW FOR. 1'FTIVE TRACT 14365 - LEWIS H011E0The design review of buil di r.g elevation Wand detailed site plan fo previously aoproved tentative tract map consNing of 41 single f homes on 5.85 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-10A welting units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned CommuiRp loca tq/ on the south side of Mountain View Drive west of Milliken Avent A 1077 - 091 -36. Sa ry Cockcroft, Lewis Homes, 7156 N M ain, Upland, requested Items H, C be pulled for discussion. Chairman McNiel opened the c hearing. Chairman McNiel asked Cockcroft what he wishedss. Mr. Cockcroft r ed he wanted an opportunity to clarify me of the design review comme made at the last Design Review meeting and 1so wanted to have Cond' n No. 15 of the Standard Conditions deleted b se neither project a homeowner association. project. Br Buller, City Planner, asked the applicant for specific clarificat on th Design Review issues. 1s I Planning Commission Minutes 14, April 22, 1992 q DRAFT ExWtetT E-S FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 1.1l i yr RH Nl_ nu 1. l'l,.p ➢'1V.V V.Y STAFF REPORT and Members of the Planing Comission FROM: grad Buller, City Planner 3y: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant_ Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE - request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the permitted uses 'within an existing 103,522 square foot indoor wholesale /retail commercial use 'located within the Ceneral ,ndustrial District {Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -20. (Continued from March 25, 1992.) Addendum Staff Report for Conditional Use Permit 91 -03 (Carnival Malls). ABSTRACT: The applicant has submitted two letters (nee Exhibits "A" 6 "S "), which provide new information addressing the March 25, 1992, staff report regarding parking, security, and business licensing issues. The applicant has also requested that the Planning Commission consider the additional use of an outdoor swap meet use within the project site to be Permitted in conjunction with a Temporary Use Permit. ANALYSIS: A. Expansion of Permitted Uses: In addition to those items identified within the March 25, 1992, staff report, the applicant is also requesting that jewelry repair services be permitted within the Carnival Malls project. Staff Comments: Retail sales of jewelry and wat ^ches is allowed under the Indoor wholesale /Retail Commercial use category. The jewelry repair service could be listed under the Convenience Sales and Service category within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Convenience Sales and Services are permitted within the subarea, wit1h an approved Conditional Use Permit from the Planning Corcm :saion. The use will not adversely impact the existing or future uses within the project, as it will be ancillary to the primary use of retail sales. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the applicant's request to permit the jewelry repair service w Lthir the Carnival Mall project site. Y4 QQ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF P.:PORT MOD. TO CUP 91 -03 - Y MES PACE Apr,! 8, 1992 Page 2 .y• Extension of Hours of Operation Zrunna 'ioiidays: %o new information has been submitted by applicant. Staff's recommendation is unchanged. Exoanded Hours of Operation, on Fridays: The applicant has requested to expand the hours of operation on Fridays from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. Staf.` Comments: Originally, staff based its recommendation on inaccurate information discussed within the shared parking study submitted by the applicant. The Development Code parking requirement for the Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial use is 1 space per 100 square feet. Alternatively, as part of the Conditional Use Permit review, the Planning Comirission may allow 1 space per 150 square feet subject to the submittal and review of a parking study. The shared parking study indicates that a total of 691 spaces will I e necessary for all uses operating at the same time on weekdays. This figure is based , the typical demand within similar centers and includes a 10 percent buffer. This figure also assumes that a ma)ority of the uses do not operate at their peak demands at the same time. A total of 760 parking stalls have been provided. Therefore, there are enough parking spaces for all existinq and future tenants within the center, as determined within the shared parking study. Operation of the facility during weekdays would not negatively impact other users. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the shared parking concept for the project, and allow the applicant to operate on Fridays. D. Other Issues: In the previous review, staff noted issues relating to business licensing and security .`or the Carnival Malls site. The applicant has contacted licensing staff and is working diligently to rectify those issues. The applicant clarified that they have security personnel and are in compliance with this requirement. Conditions had been placed in the previous staff report and on the resolutions to ensure continued compliance. In raising these issues, staff felt that the Planning Commission, in its review of the expansion of the proposed hours of operation, should be aware of these concerns. F. Use Determination: On March 26, 1992, staff received another letter from the applicant (see Exhibit "A ") requesting that we consider locating the existing General Dynamics weekend swap meet (an outdoor swap meet use) within the Carnival Malls site. The General Dynamics property is currently for sale and the operators of the outdoor electronics swap meet are seeking an alternative site for their use. IS 3 EXN 1a3K 11 � " —I PLANNING COMM:SSION STAFF -REPORT MOD. TO CJP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE April 8, 1992 Page. 3 The applicant has requested that the Planning Como ssion per out the applicant to conduct the proposed indoor /outdoor swap meet use on a trial basis through the Temporary Use Permit. process. Tie applicant is requestinc that the outdoor portion of the use be permitted to operate one Saturday a month. Staff Comments: Currently, the outdoor swap meet use is permitted Only within the Heavy Industrial zone, Subarea 15, of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Allowing this use on a regular basis within the site would require a Land Use Amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and another modification to the original Conditional Use Permit. A Temporary Use Permit serves to control and regulate land use activities of a temporary nature which might negatively effect the public health, safety, and welfare for uses such as parking lot /sidewalk sales, christmas tree lots, etc. These events are limited to three times annually, not to exceed a maximum of 3 consecutive days per event within each center (see Exhibit "C "). Staff cannot support the proposed Temporary Use Permit on a monthly basis for the following reasons: The Development Code allows each site a maximum of three Temporary Use Permits to be issued per site, annually. The applicant is requesting that these outdoor swap meets occur on a regular monthly basis. 2. Outdoor swap meets are not permitted within General Industrial zones. The Industrial Area Specific Plan clearly states that all businesses are to be conducted within an enclosed building (see Exhibit "D "). Staff has numerous concerns in combining an indoor /outdoor swap meet use within a General Industrial site. There may be CUMIlative impacts which might negatively affect other site users. Aesthetics, parking, business licensing, and site maintenance are just a few potential problems. Although the applicant is requesting a trial basis of the indoor /outdoor soap meet use, staff feels that a one- time occurrence may not be sufficient enough to predict all the cumulative impacts, particularly since the site is not fully leased or developed. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin as a public hearing, the project site was posted, and notices were sent to all properties within 300 feet of the project site. �5� r- Y+I817' � '-L PLANNING COMMISSION S'PAFF REPORT MOD. TO C,T 91 -03 - JAMES ?AVE .AOri1 8, 1992 pane RECCMMENDAT ION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Fars A, H, and C, '. i-- modi£_catrons through adoption of the attached ReSOlut.ons (separate Resolutions are provided for your convenience). If ti;e Planning Commission cannot support any of the proposed m, +difi cations, then staff should be directed to prepare Resolutions of Denial for adoption on your nest consent calendar agenda. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the proposed monthly outdoor electronic swap meet is a prohibited use for Subarea 11 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Ressppe ully itte , /b / rad / fuller City Planner RB:ALH /ifs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter dated March 25, 1992 Exhibit "H" - Applicant's Letter dated March 27, 1992 Exhibit "C" - Temporary Use Permit Requirements Exhibit "D" - Industrial Area Specific Plan "Condition of Uses" Exhibit "E" - Staff Report dated March 25, 1992 Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Uses Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Hours to Include Holidays Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Hours to Include Fridays Resolution of Denial for Outdoor Swap Meet. Use 1s5s irKHiarr "F =3 Mr. Thompson replied that it will remain only as a link to the east. Heating no further testimony, Chairman McN:e'_ closed the punlic hearing Commissioner Chitiea remarked that she was cot in favpr of the pro-.ect because it is ad-acent to residential development. She felt that if the Commission approved the project, all improvements should be made up front. Commissioner Melcher remarked that he had been with the developer at the time the policies were originally adopted, and he thought he knew the reasons for the adoption. He felt the conditions anould be revised because he did not feel they are within in the spirit of the policies. Commissioner Valletta noted that she originally opposed the project as a whole. She felt that the location on Base Line and Rochester will generate additional traffic on Rochester aecsseitating too street improvements down to Church. She 4140 felt the atom drains should be constructed in light of the experience during recent storms. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed with Commissioner Chitiea that all improvements should be made up front. Chairman McNial noted that he did not think a street should be narrowed 'mid- block. He supported staff's position of requiring the improvements. Motion: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Tolstoy, t0 issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution, approving Tentative parcel Map 13987. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCHIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIRA ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried E. MODIFICATION TO CONBTTION, CIS[ PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMU PROF - A request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the permitted uses within an existing 103,522 square foot indoor wholesale /retail commercial use located within the General Industrial oietrict (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -28. Continued from March 25, 1992.1 Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Melchor asked it the additional uses would require individual conditional use perm Lts, so that each time one of the small business*/ wanted to locate there, it would have to appear before the Planning Commission. Brad Buller, City Planner, replied as proposed they would not. Planning commlasion Minutes L4l April 8, 1992 I5� if f5144 flu I A COMMISSiOner M.elCher fee that .f the Ccam_ssion agreed t at one shared parking theory works for Friday eperaticns, the applicant would then request seven- day - per -week operations. Dan Co_eman, Principal Planner, noted the shared parking study could be used to demcnstrace that sufficient parking is available seven days per week, but the ccnditional age permit would limit the operation to whatever times the Commission dictated. Commissioner Melcher questioned why the applicant was only asking for all day Fridays, instead of all week long. He noted that concerns had been raised in the previous staff report regarding adherence to business license requirements and adequacy of security personnel. He asked how these problems had been addressed. Me. Hernandez responded that the applicant had not advised why they were only requesting Friday hours of operation. She noted that since the initial staff report, the applicant had worked with planning staff and business license staff to ensure that vendors are properly licensed. She said the City Attorney had informed staff that the conditions had been tightened ag much as legally possible to secure compliance. She said that business license staff hag been visiting the site on weekends to take applications. Me. Hernando.* observed that the applicant had dismissed the hired security service one week after commencing operations and had hired their own security force without informing staff who these security people are. She noted that the applicant has indicated they will submit a listing of their security personnel. Chairman McNiel asked if it would be legal for the outdoor swap meet to take place at the General Dynamics location. Mr. Buller said it appears the use started after adoption of the Industrial Area Specific Plan which prohibits the use. Ms noted there had been discussions at City Council and the Council was aware of the use and had indicated it was not a concern to them in its present location. He said therefore staff had not pursued enforcement. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. James Page, Carnival Malls, 11530 Sixth street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they had diligently pursued working with the City to address any problems that have come up. He stated they were trying to work with staff with regards to business licensing. He remarked that some vendors had only operated for one weekend and had therefor* not followed through with obtaining a license. He stated that the City Council had discussed the outdoor swap meet and the City Council members seemed to feel it was working well. He said the person who ran the swap meet had approached him and requested that the swap meet be moved to Carnival Malls since the General Dynamics site was being sold. He felt the swap meet could be better regulated if it was moved to his site. He noted that they are currently selling food and using portable toilets at the General Dynamics site. He noted that the swap meet operates from 6;00 to 11:00 a.m. while Carnival Malls opens at 10:00 a.m., so there would be an overlap of Planning Commission Minutes t.&T April B, 1992 15l £y4+1.&T "K `� time. He suggested that a temporary use permit be granted to allow the swap aeet to operate a maximum of three ..mes to be sure things 'would •,rock satisfactorily. He said that 'would allow them to make ad7ustmente as necessary to mitigate any problems that arise. commissioner To_stoy asked if the electronics swap meet deals :n both new and used ,merchandise. Mr. Page responded that they do. Commissioner Tolatoy noted that when the original conditional use permit for Carnival Malls was approved only new items were to be sold. Mr. Buller confirmed that was correct. Commissioner Tolatoy noted that if the electronics swap meet was going to sell second hand equipment, it would hot meet the original conditional use permit c cnditions. Mr. Page suggested the swap meet could be restricted to selling only new equipment. Commissioner Tolatoy felt a great preponderance of the electronic swap meat trade is in second hand items. He felt such a restriction would limit the swap meet to a point where it would not be successful. Mr. Page remarked that was why they had suggested allowing the swap meat on a temporary basis so that mitigations could be proposed to solve the problems that crop up. He noted that the staff report mentioned that no outdoor activities are permissiyle unless screened. He suggested mitigating the outdoor swap meet by screening it. Commissioner Tolatoy noted that outdoor swap meets are conditionally permitted in the Heavy Industrial Area and not in the zone where the applicant'. business is located. Commissioner Chitiea asked who is responsible for the lighting and security of the parking lot. Mr. Page replied that they were in conjunction with the landlord. Commissioner Chitiea noted that she had recently visited the property and it had turned dark by the time she left. She felt the parking lot lighting was insufficient with some lights not functioning. She said she saw no security personnel and she felt very uncomfortable with the conditions. She wanted those conditions addressed under the present circumstances. Mr. Page stated they had contacted the Planning Department regarding the lighting situation. He said one of the other tenants in the business park had disconnected most of the parking lot lights because they had been on his Planning Commission Minutes April 8, 1991 isa rA$4 QBIT 11 1� V Z, meter. He said they had discussed the problem with the other tenant and the landlord and the landlord is working to correct the problem and install more lighting. Commissioner Chit ea requested that additional security personnel be prevent anti.` the lighting ie sufficient. Mr. Page asked if she was looking for uniformed security personnel. Commissioner Chitiea noted she had not seen anyone at the time she was there and she was very uncomfortable. She suggested someone be there in uniform so that patrons and vendors will realize it is not merely someone who is loitering. Mr. Page agreed that was a goad suggestion and said he would work on it. Ccotieeioner :eistoy asked if it would not be possible for the applicant to require that vendors supply a copy of their business license before renting them space. Mr. Page responded that the vendors have to rent the apace before they cap apply for a business license. He said there had also been some problems with the franchise tax board. Mr. Page stated his lease agreements indicate that City business licenses are required. Commissioner Melchor noted that the applicant had indicated they were not open on Friday evenings even though the current conditional use permit allows them to be open. Mr. Page responded that they found they did not generate enough business on Friday evenings to justify being open. He said that during the day on Friday seems to be a better time for women to shop alone rather than in the evening hours when they are busy with the family. He noted that on the weekends they generally draw entire families and it was felt they could greatly increase their business by being open on Fridays during the day. Commissioner Melchor recalled that the applicant had originally requested weekend operations stating that their concept was to provide incubator stalls for people who held other jobs. He asked how the vendors would be able to be open on Fridays if they had other jobs. Mr. Page remarked that not all vendors would be open on Fridays, but he projected that about 50 percent would open with 100 percent on weekends. Commissioner Melchor asked about the security personnel program. He asked how many people were involved, what training they had received, and whether they wear uniforms. Mr. Page replied that they had terminated their contract with the security firm first hired because they did not feel the employees were capable of doing the job. He felt they were too old and infirm. He stated they had hired the Planning Commission Minutes e8+.. April 9, 1992 I C7 head person from the security firm and 'ne now cas hired security personnel :ho work dlfectly for Carnival Malls. He sea they ',ire young men up to age 25 who are healthy and alert and some have tad prlice training. cc.- ,serener Melchor asked how many people are employed solely as security personnel and when they are there, Mr. Page said there are three security personnel there when the facility ie span and none when it is closed. Commissioner Toletoy recalled there had been discussions about the amount of training for the security personnel. He noted that it did not appear the:.r security personnel had been formally trained. He felt it is important that the security people be adequately trained. Mr. Page said that they are either ex- policemen or have been trained by Carnival Malls staff, Cemmise inner Melchor asked if the security personnel wear uniforms. Mr. Page replied that they do not. Commissioner Melchor asked how a patron or vendor would find a security person. Mr. Page replied that the head of security wears a badge. He remarked that they could use uniforms. Commissioner T014toy thought that had been discussed when the use was first approved. Mr. Coleman remarked that uniforms had been discussed, but they had not been made a requirement. He said it was a requirement that security personnel were to be provided both inside and outside. Deran Yalian, Carnival Malls, 11530 Sixth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he thought the Planning Commission had made a good decision when they approved the Carnival Malls project. He said they had seen a lot of bu3lnesses come in and Some have graduated to take offices in other parts of town. He noted that the gentleman who runs the electronic@ swap meet was also in the audience. Chairman McNlel asked Mr. Yalian's function with Carnival Malls. Mr. 'Yalian replied that he manages the facility. Bryan Brock, operator for General Dynamics swap meet, stated he had operated the swap meet since its inception. He noted the swap meat was instituted for the benefit of ham radio operators and took more than a year to be approved by General Dynamics to coerate at its present location. He stated he had called the Rancho Cucamonga business office and the Police Department when they were organrrang and he was told that business licenses would not be required. He Planning Commission Minutes 69... April 8, 1992 1 ,o &fold i "'C'" I reported that the swap meet started operating in Zanuary 1988 and occurs on the second Saturday of every month. He said « is a very successful Swap meet with good quality merchandise. He noted that many people in the hobby cannot afford to buy new equipment and therefore must shop at a swap meet. He said he polices their swap meet every day that it operates and he looks for hazarccus materials or other materials against their regulations. He Said he wanted to move their operation to a class location, nor a flea market atmosphere. He said they only have electronics and relative tools that the hobbyist would use. He indicated the swap meet has grown tremendously and is now the largest of its kind in Southern California. He said they would be more than willing to work with the City to be Sur. that any necessary business licenses are obtained. He requested that they be able to operate under a temporary use permit so they could prove they run a class operation that would complement Carnival Malls. He requested that staff and the Commissioners visit the swap meet. He felt the swap meet is a benefit to the community and noted that many of the vendors leave the swap meet and then go to lunch in the area. He guessed that approximately 3,000 people attend the swap meet during the course of the day. Chairman McNial asked how many vendors generally participate. Mr. Brock estimated 350 vendors on average. Chairman McNial asked how that would affect parking at the facility. Mr. Brock said their current lot is eat up so that vendors drive up and vend from their parking spot. Chairman McNiel asked why they had not considered having the vendors inside. Mr. Brock said that Some of the vendor• would like to be indoors because they have equipment which can be damaged by the elements; however, he felt it would be difficult to have all of the vendors inside. He said some of the vendors may even be interested in being full time participants at carnival Malls. commissioner Melcher asked if the swap meet is secured by fencing when it functions at General Dynamics. Mr. Brock replied that it is not. Commissioner Melcher asked if any other business is being conducted on the property that day. Mr. Brock said there could be a small number of employees working that day. Commissioner Melchor asked how much area the swap meet occupies. Mr. Brock said he had never done an overall parking space count. Commissioner Melcher asked where they proposed placing the swap most at the Carnival Mall site. Planning Commission Minutes April 8, 1992 �6' � f*'440817 Mr. Brock said they had several ideas. He said their first thought had been to use the area across the back of the -arming lot north of the building and they might expand and use the northwest side -f necessary. He said both areas are blocked from view of the street. He s;Id tne �rea they ise on the parking lot woj.d depend upon how 'any vendors ohl:Pn to notate inside the building. C=ln,nissioner Melchsr asked if all of that property was under the control of tarn ... 1 Malls. Mr. Page responded that it -was, Commissioner Melcher asked where customers will park. Mr- Brock said customers could park in front and on the aides. He recalled that there were over 700 parking spaces available an alto. He thought there were approximately 175 ir. the back area, Pau) Petty, 9547 Clubhouse Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he worked with Mr. Brock at the General Dynamos swap meet and had been with them since their inception. He believed the function is necessary for the community. He said the amateur radio community has grown through inventing and adapting existing equipment. He said the sources for purchasing single components for developing technology has dried up and it is virtually impossible to buy only new equipment. He also noted that most people upgrade their equipment by selling their old equipment. He remarked that used commercial equipment in converted for private use. He noted that vendors and buyers from outside of California attend the swap meet. He thought that if the hours do not overlap, tnare should not be any parking problems. Commx9sioner Melchor asked how much longer they would be operating at the General Dynamics site. Mr. Petty responded they did not know. Commissioner Malcher asked if vendors are charged a fee. Mr. Petty said a space fee is collected. He said they started out without collecting fees, but the vendors requested garbage facilities and portable toilets so they now collect fees to provide such services. Richard Maratz, 8745 Lurline, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he had attended the City Council meeting when the conditional use permit for Carnival Mail* was discussed and he did not recall the council wanting to prohibit outdoor swap meets. He requested a copy of the staff report. Chairman McNiel stated that outdoor swap meets are permitted in Subarea 15 of the industrial Area Specific Plan. Mr. Maratz stated he frequents the swap meets as a buyer. He asked the Commission to approve & temporary use permit for the swap meet to be held at the Carnival Mail site. He said the swap meat currently has high visibility Planning Commission Minutes April 8, 1992 iLlol � Y4flb (T `'(q"- (0 and allowing it to operate .::.der a temporary use Dermit would give the City knowledge on how it would operate at the Carnival Mail site. Sohn Wendt, 10260 56th Street, Mira Loma, stated he is a Licensed ham radio cperator and a merter of Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service (R.A.C.E.S.), a group which works with the city's Disaster Preparedness daoartment. He said a lot of the R.A.C.E.S. members buy equipment at the swap meet. He also reported that electronics stores used to allow trade ins of used equipment, so that people used to be able to buy used equipment at electronics stores. He said that the stores no longer allow trade -ins, so the swap meet has become a ma;or stucco, of equipment. He asked the Commission to look favorably upon the swap meet. Sohn Schute, 10155 Hemlock, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he is a ham radio operator and a R.A.C.E.S. member. He said the ham radio industry ie so specialized that without the swap meet it would be necessary to drive to downtown Los Angeles in order to purchase parts. Chris Puent, stated she is one of the vendor. at Carnival Malls. She said she is a big fan of used items in that she likes coLlectables and antiques. She said she had been a vendor at Carnival Malls since Novemoer and it has been a. tough year. She hoped that the introduction of the electronics swap meet would benefit the Carnival Mall vendors and the mall vendors would benefit the swap mcct people. She said that many of the Carnival Mall vendors are there out of economic necessity because they have lost their other jobs. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Toletoy noted that the Commission needed to discuss applications for expansion of permitted uses within Carnival Malls, an expansion of the days of operation to include certain holidays, and an expansion of the hour, of operation on Fridaya. He agreed with staff's recommendations on those three items. He was concerned about the shared parking concept but felt staff had addressed his concerns. He felt the security issue should be addressed as he thought the operators had hired young people who dl.d not appear to have adequate training. He also thought the applicant could address the business license issue by not allowing anyone to sell without a City business license. He supported the electronic swap meet, but was concerned about the sale of used equipment, because he feared that other types of used equipment may then be offered and that may lead to problems with stolen merchandise. He noted that the City already has a subarea which conditionally approves outdoor swap meets, and he felt that was where the electronic swap most should locate. Commissioner Valletta agreed with staff's recommendations. She felt the electronic swap meet has played an important part in the community and is a valuable asset to the community, but she did not agree tnis was a proper location. Commissioner Melchor did not favor mixing service uses with the indoor swap meet use. He noted that both types of uses are conditionally permitted within the subarea but he did not feel it would be appropriate to mix the uses at one Planning Commission Minutes I_)ZI April 8, 1992 location.. He opposed extending the hours of operat icn to inc.ude a.11 day Friday because he felt that was an entrance to a request for other weekdays. He thought there were too many areas where the applicant was not in compliance with the original terms of the conditional use permit, and he thought perhaps that recruest could be considered after the applicant had prover. they could operate in ccmpliance. He supported the holidays recommended by staff. He did not feel the commission had enough _nformatior, to make an informed decision on the swap meet issue. He remarked that he planned to visit the General Cynamlcs awap meet on Saturday. He felt a detailed plan should be submitted for proposals on where vendors would park, where swap meet customers and Carnival Mall customers would park, how the overlapping time would to handled, etc. before the Commission could even consider permitting the swap meet use. Commissioner chitiea agreed with Staff's proposals regarding holiday.. She thought the comments made by Commissioner Melcher with regard to Friday hours were appropriate. She supported the electronics swap meet but did not feel It would be appropriate to allow the use in this location. She encouraged the swap meet operators to locate in Subarea 115, She felt the matter of security to be important and thought the securit officers need to be trained and identified by uniform. Chairman McNiel said he was not opposed to mixing the uses. He did not oppose extending the Friday hours even though the applicant may than return to ask for additional weekday operating hours because he felt the Commission would have the right to refuse. He supported the six legal holiday@ outlined by staff. He agreed the swap most is valuable. He acknowledged that it may make logical sense to tie the two uses together, but noted that it creates problems for the City. He stated approval would set a precedent. He felt that if more information and a better plan were presented, he may support the swap meet in this location. He asked if it would be possible to act on Parts A, 8, and C and defer action on the swap meet use. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, responded affirmatively. Commissioner Melchor noted that Chairman McNiel had indicated he was not opposed to expanding the Friday hours of operation because he felt the city would still have the option of refusing future requests to expand to other days of the week. He noted that the original promise was that there would be no conflict with other center users because the mall would only operate on weekends. He felt retaining the weekend only hours would be appropriate. Commissioner Valletta asked if the other Commissioners would support moving the swap meet indoors at the Carnival Mall location. She said she was not opposed to an indoor swap meet, but she would not support one outdoors. Mr. Buller indicated there would nave to be an amendment to the conditional use permit to allow sale of used equipment. He thought perhaps the condition could be worded to identify a certain indoor area could be used for the swap meet. Planning Commission Minutes Y1Vt_ April B, 1992 Commissioner Melchor suggested that all vendors at the swap meet section should be required to be l.:censed ham operators. Commissioner Toletoy questioned if the electronics swap meet were approved, if tie City would then have to approve other types of swap meets for other types of used merchandise. Mr. Buller noted that temporary use permits are generally approved for special sales of normal merchandise. He said staff had felt that the request was not in the spirit of a normal temporary use permit. Commissioner Melchor asked that the Commieeionere further discuss the requested uses in Part A. Chairman McNiel did not oppose any of the requested uses. Commissioner Melchor did not feel mortgage brokers, real estate services, travel bureaus, beauty /nail salons, or photography studios should be added. He thought other areas of the City are better suited for those uses. Commissioner Chitiea agreed this is an industrial area and she felt thost types of businesses would be better placed in other areas of the City. Shs' felt their inclusion in this area would diffuse the Commercial base. Commissioner Toletoy felt jewelry repair might be acceptable, but he did not support the other uses. Chairman McNiel felt there may be small, incubator businesses in all of those types of businesses and he thought this may be an area for them to start. Commissioner Toletoy noted that a travel agency would not be successful without having expensive computer equipment. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Vallette, to adopt the resolution approving Modification to Conditional Use Permit 91 -03, Part A, with modification to only expand the uses to include jewelry repair services. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried Motion: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Chitiea, to adopt the resolution approving Modification to Conditional Use Permit 91 -03, Part B, to expand the hours of operation to include six legal holidays. Motion carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes idN-/ April 8, 1992 1 �P'5 r- 44 I Orr \ 14, P -I CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner By: Anna-Lis. Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE - A request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the permitted uses within an existing 103,522 square foot Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use located within the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -28. (Continued from February 26, 1992.) ABSTRACT: This applicatio,, involves a three -part modification to Conditional Use Permit 91 -03 and relates to the operation of the Carnival Malls site. Part A is a request to expand the permitted uses within the site. Part H is a request to expand the permitted hours of operation during holidays. Finally, Part C is a request to expand the hours of operation to include Fridays, in addition to the current weekend operations. These modifications relate to the existing Carnival Malls site, an Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial use. Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 91 -03, approved by the City Council on July 3, 1991, conditionally allows the use to locate within Subareas 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15 within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Conditional Use Permit 91 -03 for Carnival Malls was approved by the Planning Commission on June 25, 1991, and the use began operation in November of 1991. Staff supports the approval of Part, A and H, with minor modifications, as they are consistent with the intent of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. However, Part C, the expansion of the hours of operation on Fridays, cannot he supported by staff as the applicant has failed to comply with the conditions of approval and lacks sufficient parking. This report reviews each request independently and provides the appropriate resolution for each. APPLICANT'S REQUESTS: A. Expansion of Permitted Uses: The applicant has requested that the following uses be permitted to operate within the Carnival Malls site: travel agencies, mortgage brokers, real estate sales, beauty or nail salons, and photography studios. Photography studios and travel agencies are listed under the Personal Services category. Mortgage brokers and real estate sales are listed under the H 10 ExH /6.r 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE `March 25, 1992 pace 2 category of Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services. Finally, beauty salens;'nail salons are listed under the category of Convenience Sales and Sera_oes. (See Exhibit "F "). Staff Comments: All of the requested uses are listed under categories that are currently conditionally permitted within Subarea 11, with the approval of the Planning Commission. These uses w111 not adversely impact the existing of future uses within Carnival Malls or the site. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conditionally permit the proposed uses, as identified above, to locate within the Carnival Malls. B. Extension of Hours of Operation During Holidays: The applicant is proposing to extend the existing permitted hours of operation to include, "ALL LEGAI, HOLIDAYS, such as, New Year's Day, Valenttne's Day, Lincoln's and Washington's Birthday, St. Patrick's Day, Armed Forces Day, Memorial Day, Flag Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, United Nation's Day, Halloween, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day (and the day after), and the week before Christmas." (See Exhibit "C -1. ") Staff Comments: A majority of the days that the applicant is proposing to operate are net legal holidays. In general, most industrial and office businesses operate through all of the above identified holidays. However, it can be reasonably argued that most businesses shutdown or reduce operations on Independence Day, Memorial Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. There may be cumulative parking impacts to the existing light industrial users, and future users on the site if the request is granted as proposed. The parking study, submitted by the applicant in June 1991, indicates that there is a deficit of 85 parking stalls with all existing and future site users operating at the same time isee Alternative 3 of the attached Exhibit, "D ") on a weekday. Additional impacts that may effect other site users are noise, traffic, and trash. In general, other site users are not negatively impacted by the indoor wholesale /retail cosmercial use because they maintain typical hours of operation, from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., while the Carnival Malls site currently operates during peak off -set hours (i.e., Friday nights and weekends). Therefore, the site is adequately maintained, and routine upkeep for the site is facilitated by the off -set hours. Based upon routine site inspections, these issues up until this point, have been adequately mitigated. However, use of the site by Carnival Malls on a majority of these holidays could lead to impacts to other site users operating at the same time. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recormnends Chat the Planning Commission approve the expanded hours of operation to include the following holidays only: Independence Day, MerorraI may, T'nankscivinc Day, and Christmas Day. C. Expanded Hours of Operation on Fridays: In addition to requesting expanded 'hours of operation during holidays, the applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission extend their current hours of operation to include Fridays from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. (See Exhibit Staff comments: The applicant currently maintains the following hours of operation: Monday through Friday - 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 P.M. (Incidental stacking of merchandise for vendors and office hours for the management team - not open to the public.) Friday - 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. - Retail Sales Saturday - 10:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. - Retail Sales Sunday - 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. - Retail Sales The primary impact of allowing retail sales during the daytime hours on Fridays is parking. As discussed in Part B above, the parking study projected an 85 -space parking deficit on site for all users operating at the same time on a weekday (see Alternative 3 of Exhibit "D "). The parking standards applied to this alternative are consistent with the existing Industrial Area Specific Plan and Development Code requirements. Therefore, staff cannot support the expansion because of the inadequacy of parking facilities on -site. OTHER ISSUES: When this project was originally approved, the Planning Commission found it important to establish a compliance review for the intended use. The condition requires that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, twelve months from the date of release of occupancy, to ensure conformance with the conditions of approval and any other health, safety, and welfare issues (see Condition No. 16 in Exhibit "C ^). Staff has been carefully monitoring the business operation since their opening in November of 1991. The applicant has been in significant compliance with the conditions of approval. However, staff has been working with the applicant on two outstanding compliance issues: (1) security and (2) business licensing. A. Security - Approximately one week after the project's opening in November 1991, Carnival Malls released their security personnel and are in violation of this condition. Security was to be provided, a minimum of two security personnel for the first 25,000 square feet of leasable area, in addition to the personnel /management team. Staff has not received any security complaints from the users, 11�� Y-0 1817 "44 �'L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TC CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 4 neighboring businesses, or th'e Police Department. This may be attributed, in Dart, to the sluagi sh economy which 'eas curtailed their business volume. B. Business Licensing - The Planning Division and Business Licensing staff have worked very closely to ensure that all businesses locating within Carnival Malls are properly licensed. At present, approximately 38 percent of the businesses still in operation have not been licensed (see Exhibit "E "). Though the applicant has complied with the specific condition that a monthly list of businesses be provided to the Planning and Business Licensing Divisions, the intent of the condition has not been met. Busi�nsses are operating without proper business licenses which means a loss of sales tax revenue for the City. Business Licensing has proved to be a difficult condition to enforce. In addition to the monthly tenant list, Business Licensing staff has had several on -site inspections on weekends in order to educate the vendors within Carnival Malls of the Business Licensing procedures. In reviewing this condition with the City Attorney, staff believes the language is as strong as it can be. Though these issues appear to be resolvable and are being addressed by the applicant, staff believes it to be important to raise these issues should the Commission find them germane to the applicant's request to expand the business operation. The condition requires that a review be conducted in November of 1992; however, the Commission may review a CUP at any other time deemed necessary to ensure compliance. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT /POLICE DEPARTMENT: Both the Fire District and the Police Department have been notified of the proposed use. Both departments have expressed no objection to the applicant's request. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: A. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Coder and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located; and e. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. l�°t SXll MWIT lit` %,S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - iAM.ES PAGE March 25, 1992 page 5 CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Part A and B. with modifications, of the applicant's request to expand the permitted uses and operate during specific holidays through the attached Resolutions of Approval. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the applicant's request to expand the 'hours of operation to include Fridays through the attached Resolution of Denial. However, if after your review, the Commission deems that there is sufficient evidence to warrant a full compliance examination, then a public hearing date should be chosen and properly advertised to consider possible modification or revocation of the CUP. In that case, the applicant's request for expansion should be continued to the same date. Peeper y submi ed, Brad ler City Planner BB:ALH /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" - Resolution of Resolution of Resolution of Site plan Floor Plan Applicant's Letter Parking Study Business License Memo ISP Land Use Summary Resolution No. 91 -80 Approval for Expanded Uses Approval to Operate During Denial to Expand the Hours Specific Holidays of Operation �Jo E�X-H IeWrii -4 qf T.bk 2 SITE PA G REOUL4EA¢ m 1-1� P,- Y. /I 0151-F'S 1n RaW MYI It, Aw F0 Amo m loc — WEEi.'DAY - TOTAL TOTAL SITE PARIOTIG SPACES PAR1O3lG SPACES L VD USE :SF RE0002EMF2VT 2E000tED REOVa2EMENP REOVRiFD AOnv4�e 1 e6 ut W Om�pd 11 i0 0 0 tSOUt x720 I6,]OS 1/D000 i3 0 0 00¢ V.ant 3808 1?50 133 .W1000 76 Rcu 101553 VIM 11 1/1000 C11 TOTAL 5% 40 � 2 lmd O p00 N3DD 1/2000 10 0 0 V. 2620 1 /2m 13 0 0 Om V.1 34100 V150 153 ."now 26 In6oar Rmd 101552 11/1000 m 1111000 3A1 TOTAL 501 316 A0aio14e 3 1m.v O ped 31x00 In000 I0 0 0 Vu 26,705 lam 0 0 0 Omer Va , 31300 11250 US .an00o 26 l Rnnt 103!32 1:150 in 1150 mi TOTAL 075 • 717 1-1� P,- Y. /I 0151-F'S 1n RaW MYI It, Aw F0 Amo m loc December 10, 1991 Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California 91tio Dear Anna -Lisa: After careful consideration of our operation and its impact on the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Carnival Mails is applying to the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a MODIFICATION of its existing CUP at 115JU SIXTH Street. We are requesting the tollowing 1) Inclusion of Personal Service Sales In addition to Now Products Sales. These Personal Services typically include, but are not limited to travel agencies, mortgage brokers, real estate sales, personal care, ( beauty or nail care )r- photography studios and other activities typical of a personal service nature. 1) Extention of our HOURS of OPERATION to include ALL LEGAL HOLIDAYS, sucn as; NEW YEARS DAY VALENTINE'S DAY, LINCOLN'S d WASHINHTON'S BIRTHDA , ST. PATRICK'S DAY, ARMED FORCES DAY, MEMORIAL DAY, FLAG DAY, INDEPENDENCE DAY, LABOR DAY, COLUMBUS DAY, UNITED NATION'S DAY, HALLOWEEN, VETERANS DAY, THANKSGIVING, the day after THANKSGIVING and the Week before CHRISTMAS. 3) Extention of our HOURS of Operation on FRIDAYS to Start at IU:()U AM. Instead of b:UU PM. and End at U:UU PM. we are requesting this for the following reasons: 1) Service Sales are a PERMITTED USE in our LAND USE Sun -ARRA. It is also a PERMITTED USE in the ADJACENT OFFICE BUILDING on Site. It will be a MINOR portion of the Total Use of the vendors in our facility. In most other cities It Is a PERMITTED COMMERCIAL USE. It Is also part of the EXISTING USE in the MAJOR MALLS In the City of Rancho Cucamonga. L; Extention of Hours during HOLIDAYS means EXISTING TENANTS in the other buildings on site, during those Holidays, WILL BE OFF. Since the surrounding area is INDUSTRIAL EVEN LESS TRAFFIC IMPACT will occur on these Holdays for the jams reason. There should be NO TRAFFIC problem during the WEEK BEFORE CHRISTMAS In that this is a period when people take Vacations and business In our area Is generally light. ALL COMPARABLE FACILITIES CHARGE "EXTRA RENTAL- which means some of our Tenants will choose NOT to STAY OPEN and some will be tied up In FULL TIME JOBS ELSEWHERE. This will REDUCE our TOTAL occupancy, customer traffic and overall parking needy if 112- F_W iE51-r 1J 31 PARKING STUDIES DONE ( ON COMPARABLE FACILITIES ) IN OUR INITIAL PARKING STUDY, SHOW THAT FRIDAY IS A "LIGHT RETAIL DAY "• We are a FAMILY FACILITY and FRIDAY Is not a FAMILY SHOPPING DAY. In addition, a number of our TENANTS are EMPLOYED ELSEWHERE and DO NOT OPEN THEIR STORE ON FRIDAYS. This Is the reason that FRIDAYS are a "LIGHT RETAIL DAY" In all comparable facilities. As per our SHARED PARKING STUDY done for the CUP, TABLE '/, ALTERNATE MJ, WEEKDAY PARKING, THE REPORT SHOWS THAT "WE CAN SAFELY OPERATE EVEN DURING THIS FRIDAY TINE PERIOD ". Of ALL the requirements for parking availability the Limits under ALTERNATE #3 are the moot RESTRICTIVE, HOWEVER FOR THE TIME PERIOD REQUESTED WE MEET EVEN THOSE REQUIREMENTS. IT IS NOT OUR INTENT TO IMPLEMENT ALL THE REQUESTS OF THIS MODIFICATION. HOWEVER, WE DO NOT EXPECT TO MODIFY OUR CUP ON A YEARLY BASIS SO WE ARE MAKING "ALL" OUR REQUESTS FOR THE FUTURE NOW! Thank you again for your Kind help. S cerel� J mete Pdga oz carnivat Malls JRP /la ( f 113x{'f"l8l'l� RESOLUTION ND. (/ l - !I �O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A MODIFICATION 'I0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91 -03, FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION ON FRIDAYS, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS I1 SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229- 262-28. A. Recitals. (1) James Page has filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 91 -03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit modification request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of June 1991, the Planning Commission approved the indoor wholesale. /retail commercial use for the following hours of operation: Fridays 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays. (iii) On the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) After receiving all public testimony, the Planning Commission made the determination that the extension of hours of operation on Fridays would negatively impact existing and future site users (parking, circulation, site maintenance, etc.). As a result, the Planning Commission directed stuff to prepare a Resolution of Denial to return at their meeting of April 22, 1992. (v) On the 22nd day of April 1992, the Planning Commission received public, testimony on the Resolution. At the conclusion of the public testimony, the Planning Comission adopted a Resolution of Denial on the application. (vi) On May 4, 1992, the applicant filed an appeal of the Planning Commission decision within the time limits prescribed by law. (vii) On the 3rd day of June 1992, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (viii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. E. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I j\-j CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. APPEAL OF MOD. TO CUP 91 -03, PART C - JAMES PAGE June 3, 1992 Page 2 1. This Council hereby specifically finds tnat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on June 3, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 11520 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and is presently improved with three research and development buildings and 760 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General Industrial. (c) The Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial Use is located within a General Industrial zone Subarea 11 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The General Industrial zone was intended to accommodate a wide range of light to medium manufacturing and wholesale, storage and distribution uses. Typically, administrative office, professional, and indoor wholesale /retail commercial uses are not allowed to reduce potential land use conflicts. The primary finding in permitting the use to locate within the Research and Development Industrial Center was the fact that there would not be any conflict with the hours of operation of the general industrial users within the site with off- set hours of operation on weekends only. The ancillary nature of the indoor wholesale /retail commercial use on weekends only was found to be consistent with the original intent of the General Industrial zone. This proposal to expand the hours of operation directly conflicts with the intent of the General Industrial zone of the Industrial Specific Plan and would conflict with on -site business operations. (d) The original approval of the application was based on the fact that the application would operate during different hours of operation of other users within the center, thereby, minimizing all potential impacts to other current site and future businesses. With the current proposal, hours of operation on Fridays from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 P.M. would conflict with the hours of operation of other site users and adversely impact those businesses. (e) The proposed hours of operation would conflict with the utilization of parking facilities for other users within the site. (f) The Development Code requirement for the indoor wholesale /retail commercial use is 1 parking space per 100 square feet; however, the Planning Commission may approve 1 space per 150 square feet based upon a parking study. The parking study indicates that 875 parking spaces would be required (using a 1/150 ratio) for the entire site on weekdays, whereas, only 760 parking spaces are available. 1-)5 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. APPEAL OF MOD. TO CUP 91 -03, PART C - JAME5 PAGE June 3, 1992 Pace 3 (g) The Planning Commission rejected the use of a "shared parking" approach to calculating parking because of uncertainty of future tenant use classifications and lack of sufficient narking demand data for indoor wholesale /retail Commercial use. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental. to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the application. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 3, 1992 TO Mayor and Members of the City Co cit FROM: Debra J. Adams, CIVIC, City Clerk SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF MATTERC FOR THE NOVEMBER 9 1992 CONSIDERATION OF FOR THE ELECTION 5, Attached you will find Resolutions relating to the November 3, 1992 election. It is recommended that the Council adopt the following Resolutions: 1. Calling for the Municipal Election to be held November 3, 1992, for the positions of Mayor, two City Council seats, City Clerk and City Treasurer and to consolidate said election with the County of San Bernardino. 2. Approving the regulations for candidates running for elective office. At the Council's February 19, 1992 meeting it was approved to place an initiative on the ballot asking the voters should the Mayor's term be changed from two to four years. It is recommended that the Council adopt the following Resolution: Calling for the special municipal election to be held November 3, 1992 and submitting to the voters the question of changing the Mayor's term from two to four years and to consolidate said election with the County of San Bernardino. Additionally, the following Resolutions are notional for the Council's consideration relative to the Mayor's tern measure. You may approve or disapprove any of the Resolutions listed below as you so choose: Authorizing certain members to file a written argument regarding a Clty measure. 2. Directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis. 3. Providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for City Measure. After the Council considers all of the above items, I will proceed as required to place these matters on the November 3 ballot. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 989 -1851, Ext. 2005. /dja Attachments 1 RE90TDPSCK NO. 92 -L Y V• • Y •:•i Y I . I '• Y H5 5• Y' a 5 • • la • I /1 M • Y5'J • V5•w • i I M 95• I' S• 1 1 •a 1 • 515•' M /a. I• •• 4` 11• 1' I• a 5. r v 5 u 5 5• • a 5 • • la • r n •• V&HRFAS, iader the provisions of the laws relating to General Law Cities in the state of California, a general municipal election shall be held on 'Tuesday, November 3, 1992, for the election of Municipal Officers. NOW, THEREEME, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamlmiga does hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General law Cities within said State, there shall be, and there is hereby called and ordered, held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Oxmty of San Bernardino, State of California, on Tuesday, the 3rd day of November, 1992, a General Municipal Election of the qualified electors of said City for the paTnse of electirg a Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for full term of two years; two mmartuer's of the City Crnmcil for the fall term of far years; a City Clerk of the City of Rmyho Curamcxga for a full term of far years; and a City Treasurer of the City of Rands Cucamonga for a full term of four years. SF 9WCN 2: That the General Municipal Election hereby called for the date bereinbefore specified shall be and is hereby ordered consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on said date within the City. The proceedings, polling places, precincts, precinct board members and officers for the General Municipal rlection hereby called shall be the same as those provided for said Statewide General Election. The Board of Supervisors of San BerrkuY ino County is hereby requested to order the consolidation of the General Municipal Election hereby called with said Statewide General Election, and said Registrar of Voters is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of said General Municipal Election and said election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election and one formal ballot, namely the ballot used at said General Election shall be used. Said Registrar of Voters shall supervise the canvass of said returns for said Special municipal Election and transmit said returns to the City Council of said City which shall thereafter declare the results thereof. SD-M�v: The City of Rancho 0.ravmga shall reimburse said County for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a properly approved bill. SMMCtl 4: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Qramcnga is directed to forward, without delay, to said Board of Supervisors and to said Registrar of Voters each a certified copy of this Resolution. I T6 RESOILMCN NO. 92 ->�� 95�•ri1•` • I y Ny1 • 11 w • •'• Y II 11 >. 1^ p • Y 1 5YN I • • F 5• 1 >• • 1 1 }> Y• U 1 I M. • it Y 1111'1 5: W 515 •:• I I N5 5• MY 51 5 • Id 1 1 1 I M • 5.x.1 • 5 .0 5• YdMEAS, Section 10012 of the Elections Cade of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt regulations pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the candidates statement. NOW, TSffMWE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dons hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows: SECMCN 1• General Provisiore. That pursuant to Section 10012 of the Election Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at the Qi w Municipal Election to be held in the City of Rancho Cucemo ga on November 3, 1992, may prepare a candidate's statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. Such statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief descrip- tion of m more than 200 words of the candidate's edunatirn and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. Such statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. Such statement shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate's nomination papers are filed. Such statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period. SECTION 2: §panish A candidate may elect to have said candidate statement translated into Spanish at an additional cost to be determined by the Registrar of Voters. St'MON 3: Additional Materials. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package. SBMCN 4: Pavement. The Registrar of Voters shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidate's statements filed pursuant skuant to the Elections Code and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance his or her pro rata share as a condition of having his or ber statement included in the voter's pamphlet. The Registrar. of Voters shall bill each candidate for any cost in excess of the deposit and shall refund within 30 days of the election any unused portion of the deposit. 5=0H 5: That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate's representative a copy of this Resolution at tits time nominating petitions are issued. Iliq Resolution No. 92 - * ** Pa4e 2 M=CN 6: fiat all previous resolutions establishing camoil policy on payment for candidates statements are repealed. SUMIIN 7: That this Resolution shall apply only to the election to be held on November 3, 1992, and shall than be repealed. mV RE901IM014 N0. 92 -*M • N• • N• 1 °� V• I 11 I '• N • 1 1 • 11' • V•J Y ■•• 3 3 • • IY 1 1 1 M •' k1 1I 411•d J 1 • • J I: 3• 1 1 • A • • 11 31 J C••• • 11 Y • • •I N' • l •• N3•. 1 I 13• 1 1 n • • n y • I• Y • 3•. ""S, the City Camcil desires to submit to the electors of the City the question of whether the Mayor shall serve a four year term; and [•URFAS, the submis sion of said question to the electors at a special election held for that purpose is authorized by GoverTment Nde 34900. NOW, Ti E, the City Council of the City of R urbo Cucamonga does hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows: SOMCN 1: That pursuant to the regairements of the laws of the state of California relating to general law cities within said State, there shall be, and there is hereby called and ordered to be held in the City of macho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, on Tuesday, the third (3rd) day of Nov®Iber, 1992, a special municipal election for the purpose of submitting the following question to the electors of the City of Rarcho Cucamonga, California, to wit: SFX.TICN 2: That the special ariicipal election hereby called for the date hereinabove specified shall be and is hereby ordered consolidated with the statewide general election to be held on said date, and within said city the precincts, polling places and officers of election for the special aunicipal election hereby cited shall be the same as these provided for said statewide general election. The Board of STexVisors of San Bernardino Canty is hereby requested to order the consolidation of the special municipal election hereby called with said statewide general election, and said Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of said special municipal election and said election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one (1) election, and only one (1) form of ballot, numel.y, the ballots used in said general election, shall be used. Said Board of Supervisors shall certify the results of the canvass of the rehaTs of said special municipal election to the City Council of said city which shall thereafter declare the results thereof. 1431 Y's ^Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years'." SFX.TICN 2: That the special ariicipal election hereby called for the date hereinabove specified shall be and is hereby ordered consolidated with the statewide general election to be held on said date, and within said city the precincts, polling places and officers of election for the special aunicipal election hereby cited shall be the same as these provided for said statewide general election. The Board of STexVisors of San Bernardino Canty is hereby requested to order the consolidation of the special municipal election hereby called with said statewide general election, and said Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of said special municipal election and said election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one (1) election, and only one (1) form of ballot, numel.y, the ballots used in said general election, shall be used. Said Board of Supervisors shall certify the results of the canvass of the rehaTs of said special municipal election to the City Council of said city which shall thereafter declare the results thereof. 1431 RuSolutionn No. 92 - * ** Page 2 SUMCN 3: That the polls for said election shall be opened at 7 :00 A.M. on the day of said election and shall remain open continuously from said time until 9:00 P.M. of the same day when said polls shall be closed, eucept as provided in Section 14436 of the Elections Code of the State of California. SUCITCN 4: That in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, said elections shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections in said city. SBMCN 5: That notice of the time and place of holding said election is hm-eby given and the City Clerk is hereby authorized, instructed and directed to give such further or additional notice of said election in time, farm, and manner required by law. SBCITCN 6: That the Board of Supervisors is hereby requested to issue instructions to the Registrar of Voters to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said consolidated election. SECPICN 7• The City of Panhdho Cucamonga recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this arsolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any such costs. SfICPiCN 8: That the City Clerk of the City of Rancho o Cucamonga is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of Shpavisors and the Registrar of Voters of the Casty of San Bernardino. ion OPTIONAL RE'lJI ON NO. 92- /S • 5:• • • Y I Y •• M■ •' Y I a • • Y • V • P 1 • •� 1 l• 1 Vi•1V t • 1> C Yw • • p "C ' li 'O •A 1 M IY ^ i• WHEREAS, a special mmicipal election is to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga on Novede 3, 1992, at which time there will be submitted to the qualified electors of the City the follawing question: "Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years ?" Now, TbRIMIME, the City Council of the City of Rancho nramonga does hereby .resolve, declare, detex m and order as follows: SPX=QH 1: That this City Council, being the legislative body of the City of Rancho nramorga, authorizes: members of that body, to file a written argument in favor of The City measure set froth in the recitals hereof in aoccmdance with Article 6, OkVter 3, Divisim 5 of the Elections Code of the State of California and to change the argument until and including the date fined by the City Cleric after which no argu ne nts for or against the City mwamm may be submitted to the City Clerk. YAM WIM OPTIONAL RFSOPS/ CN NO. 92 7�• • • it •• YI • 41 Y • •'• •'P • V' t••. •••> I 1I M C•. MUIUM, a special municipal election is to be held in the City of Poncho Cuuanorga on November 3, 1992, at which these will to submitted to the qualified electors of the City the following question: "-Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years ?" NOW, nMZM=, the City mlmcil of the City of Rancho Cucmoaga does hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows: SNCt•ICK is That this City Council directs the city Clerk to transmit a copy of the questim to the City Attorney, ahe City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis showing the effect of the questions on the existing law and the operation of the measure. Mrt impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the city Clerk for the filing of primary arguments. IqLA OPTIONAL 1�;b MSCUMC T NO. 92`+1 • Y• • N 1 • °� "• U 1 •I' 1 1 1 1 VMEAS, Section 5014.5 of the Elections Azle of the State of California authorizes the city Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal arguments for City ^ea_ras submitted at municipal elections. NOW, MMMU26, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve, declare, determine, and miler as follas: SbM,W 1: That pursuant to Sects 5014.5 of the Elections Code of the State of California, if any person submits an argument against a City measure, and an argument has been filed in favor of the city measure, the City Clerk shall immediately send copies of that argument to the persons filing the argument in favor of the City measre. The persons filing the argument in favor of the city measure nay prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not exoeeditg 300 words. The City Clerk shall sad copies of the argument in favor of the measure to the persons filing the argument against the City measure, who may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument to the argument in favor of the City measure not exceeding 250 words. The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the City Clark not more than 10 days after the final date for filing direct arguments. Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same mariner as the direct arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut. SEMM 2: That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for City measures are repealed. S =CK 3: fiat the provisions of Section 1 shall apply only to the election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 1992, and shall than be repealed. 1$5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 3, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City manager BY: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst f SUBJECT: LIBRARY MASTER PLAN At the .April 1, 1992 City Council meeting, the Council directed staff to contact the County regarding its plans for current and future library services and facilities in Rancho Cucamonga and verification of revenues and expenditures associated with library services in Rancho Cucamonga. ,Attached is the response from Harry M. Mays, County Administrative Officer. Under Item 1, "Verification of Revenues and Expenditures," Mr. Mays states that the City of Rancho Cucamonga generated approximately $300,000 in tax revenues for library services. This amount is significantly lower than what staff estimated was being generated for library purposes (approximately $1.2 million). Because of the discrepancy, staff contacted Barbara Anderson, the County Librarian, regarding the matter. Ms. Anderson stated that she would investigate as to whether this included the combined monies generated from the City and the Agency Project Area. As of the date of this report's preparation, Ms. Anderson has not responded. An additional point of clarification, on page two of the letter is a summary of expenses incurred by the County for providing library services. The amount of the indirect facility expense (10,800 sq.ft. x $1.00) needs to be multiplied by twelve in order to calculate the annual cost of $129,600. The library subcommittee (Williams and Wright) directed staff at their last meeting to develop a chart which provides figures for a number of construction options. Attached is the chart which gives estimated construction and the estimated operations and maintenance costs for different sized libraries. Option One is the original plan of a 135,000 gross square foot library (104,000 net sq.ft.). Option Two shows the costs associated with a 75,000 gross square foot library (60,000 net sq.ft.). Option Three shows the costs for the original 135,000 gross square foot library, but initially occupying 30,000 square feet. Option Four provides the data on a 38,000 gross square foot library (30,000 net sq.ft.). Also attached is a brief outline of the withdrawal process as outlined in the Implementation Document. One item to note is that at the time of withdrawal, the City Council has the option of acting as the Library Board or appointing the initial Board Members. As always, staff is available to answer any questions. Respectfully submitted, i Linda D. Daniels Deputy City Manager attachments: Letter dated May 11, 1992 from Harry Mays Construction, Operations and Maintenance Chart Outline of Withdrawal Process !S1 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO County Administrative Office HARRY M. MAYS Coonry Admintrvauve Omm May 11, 1992 Mr. Jack Lam, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Jack: No. 1 Arrowhead Pl , 5th Floor 385 North Arrowhead A,..c San Berwdino, CA 9MI"IN (714) 387-5418 Td,pie (714) 387:V30 BOARD OF SUMVISORS Muria Turotl ....................... Fm O Mar tan D. MAdv ...................... Snvnd M,,, Barbva Cram Riordan ............... nW Dvrritt Larry WWku, Chaimun ............. Fm hcuma Robe" L. Hanamck ............. .... Ffth IXrr.in RECEIVED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTRATION MAY 19 1992 Please refer to your letter to me dated April 6, 1992, regarding library service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In your letter, you asked for a verification of revenues and expenditures associated with providing County library service to the City, a plan for providing library services commensurate with the tax revenues generated within the City for library service, and a capital facilities plan detailing how current and future library facilities will be financed and maintained. I am responding to each of these areas of concern separately as follows: Verification of Revenues and Expenditures According to the County Auditor - Controller, the County Library is expected to receive approximately $800,000 of the $64 million in tax revenues generated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in FY 1991 -92, The Library's share of these revenues is based on amounts collected in 118 separate tax rate areas within the City for support of the County's free library system. The County Library's projected expenditures for operation of the Rancho Cucamonga Library in FY 1991 -92 are $800,445. This figure is based on both direct and indirect expenditures incurred by the County to operate the Library branch. A breakout of these expenditures by major expenditure category follows: M JACK LAM Page 2 May 11, 1992 FY 1991 -92 EXPFNDITURE CATEGORY EXPUSD� Direct Indirec Salary and Benefits (9.0 budgeted staff) $ 264,383 Services and Supplies 149,704 Capital Equipment 8,279 Facilities Costs (Utilities, 38.880 maintenance, custodial) Subtotal $ 461,246 Administrative Overhead -County Library $ 164,369 Administrative Overhead - COWCAP 45,230 Facility (10,800 sq. ft. 129,600 0$1.00) Subtotal $ 339,199 GRAND TOTAL $ 800,445 2. Library Service Plan Although the County Library is sensitive to the amount of tax- generated revenue it receives from each of the communities it serves, the department does not formulate an annual service plan for branch operations based on this factor alone. The County Library system is a countywide regional program and, as such, attempts to provide a reasonably consistent service level to all the municipalities and communities it serves. In some years, the Library's planning priorities for a given regional branch may take precedent over other branches in the system. Accordingly, some fiscal years may be perceived as "better than others" in terms of satisfying community expectations for library service, some may he perceived as "worse." The overall objective, however, is to ensure that each branch is provided with an annual level of service that is generally commensurate with the needs of its community. 19 JACK LAM Page 3 May 11, 1992 3. Facilities Plannine As part of the regional planning process, the Library has created a Structures and Improvement Fund to finance the relocation of County library facilities, establish new sites, and remodel/expand existing facilities. Cities wishing to significantly expand their current branch facilities or add new branches share the responsibility for procuring the requisite financing for such capital projects. In the past, the County Library has been supportive of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's past efforts to secure State Library Bond Act funding for this purpose and will participate with the City in future grant applications for construction funding. I hope this information is responsive to the questions raised by the City Council. In closing, I should mention that the County's goal is to continue providing a high level of library service to the residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. As you are aware, the County Library provides service from the existing branch as well as six bookmobile locations. The bookrnobiles stop at retirement homes, mobile home parks, and various neighborhoods. Additionally, they stop at YMCA camps during the summer. The Library's proposed budget for FY 1992 -93 includes adequate funding to continue these levels of service, If you have any further questions regarding the County Library's services to the City, please feel free to contact my office or that of Barbara Anderson, County Librarian, at 387 -5721. ncerely' 'i I, HA RY . MAYS County Administrative Officer cc Honorable Jon Mikels, Second District Tim Kelly, GSG Assistant Administrative Officer Barbara Anderson, County Librarian 1Ro RANCHO CUCAMONGA CENTRAL PARK L IRARY OPERATING BUDGE[ COMPARISON May 20, 1992 N 92111120W d 135,000 G.S.F_ OC& Trre Qlld'ra Tlrn3e OefiM Far 75,OD0 G.S.F. 135,000 G.S.F. 3kOOD G.S.E M Library a 104.000 "° Library a 60,0001°d Librny @ 30,000 NN talruy 0 30,000 Staff Salaries and Benefits 2,190,000. 11) 1,989,888. 1,641,744. m 1,641,744. - Library Materials 505,500. (a 455,400. 10 396,000.0 396,000. � (Boat. and Audio Yon) Library meting Expense 442,000. o) 441,017. (* 377,803. 0 377,803.1% Supptia) Library Capital Expense 40,ODD. m 40,000.10 40.000.'* 40,000. 0) (Addition sid Replme.e ) d Building Maintenance and 583,200. F1 324,000. m 194,400.0 194,400, m Utilities Grounds Maintenance and 113,600. M 113,600. m 113,600. m 113,600. m — Utilities 6 J Tom 3,874,303. 3,363,905. 2,763,547. 2,763,547. Library- Level Op{i__ One at Service O n Pty Two __ Ootinn Thwn Ontim Four S.F./Population .9 14> .5210 (0 26 "' m Comparison- Current .26 c E S.F./Population .63 M Comparison - Projected .36 m .18 initial m .18 initial M .63 ultimate 1* Full Time Staff 42 38 32 Service Desks Staffed (9) 32 (9) m m Hours of OperationlWcek 68 68 68 68 Branch Library Impact (n WI Gal 0.8) ni NOTE: Each option would have an initial collection of 10D,000 volumes a $21.0D/vol. = $2,100,000. initial cost for boots. m (1) Fr®L RW g Q) CitO- Cil] -4l It) ribvmYWY / 'rlaliri�f ssaWi a (3) Msm Wnq s48r Wft.W ear • sbeleaalpnelu. aPr+iadhmrie. and or..la smies. Cha& C3 oft 0 ldsSO. 6➢is, assW, lrlrs AW10 Ymi <t0 o.ta.a..raa..a�tYA00rID:.ao0a MZ.V Yw«y�.e�g1w+�cer� (O Uimfm S -F. adm�l4,,I�Ia 113.000. (111 7Y IU1IYw1/rp�we iF isA �i./�rasMYii,r�W F F�� 01^1�W 12y�ysdvr.dlfr.000d�4.'Y,q (13) Wi ,sf ewb of Ccmi)d .biw =;tp �ee�f cw Wises br l� W 4b. fa Dori (r) Cimdsdo�, Rs .sDreO Total 26 Months 40 Months 32 Months 40 Months NOTE: Each individual line item cost includes contractor Overhead and Profit, bonds, and insurance_ (11 lrcbe6u+.apuktgrr Pbn tsvd .adcmd Plm. c1 Iand.sties.enurnwv.n :n¢n. n. oe l� HIw'oue°"°"°°"r'°d"'p t2 CVA w°e("eW •,t.s'md, bGC .ipalr.a+, dd«t rs) (st leeu,a., c.eer Ism ei?).e.0.1km n em. h.ah .. (6) <-W'dd'd A of dt� Ya 20% CRQ JI at bAr•. (7) wd". b- altmrao* w1.n l�/s ;30.000 J.F. (s) h lam a.�r :r t�,o.,�r� n.n. vr.,a -A homer foe ee&ed (31 IxOedslidF1'+ka r..t N1,000 J.F.'ao,m6kq�.� dyed (10) O&Nre6 r 70%ar Ok*. A ZZ(k) k. o%uab (111 ImWece rum wru^�I+Mb 4¢ (1131 3) ( 7ncewue bvi lraor.M�or..ntr ra naeasri; ,ri.laa:Qil.»w.�i` -. ,�r �f4107..e. stew eir �.,m si ,vey RANCHO CUCAMONGA CENTRAL PARK LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION RUDGKr COMPARISON Mal, 20, 1992 Option One d 135,000 p.S.F_ Library ODUM Two '75,000 G.S.F. Library Option 71ic 135,000 S -F. Shill Q%kA Farr 38,000 G -S.F. Call Item Library a 30,000 Library 30,000 Building 20,295,328.(" 12,005,976.(") 10,028,772. m 5,700,00D. Landscape 3,154,458. 3,242,563.02) 1,919,140.(a 1,992,140. Paricing 497,250. m 409,145. nn 497,250.14 497,250.0 Off -Sites 1,266,498.131 1,266,498. 1,266,498. M 1,266,498. m F.F. & E. 4,470,102. M 3,375,000. (^ 789,750. "1 789,750. On-Site Utilities 692,422. (s1 692,422. 692,422. m 692,422. GrMin8 596,700. 568,620. nn 596,700_ 596,70D- Sub-Total 30,972,758. 21,560,224. 15,790,532. 11,534,760, J 10% Contingency % Y 3,097,276. 2 156 022 1,579,053. 1,153,476. ■ TOW 34,070,033. 23,716,246. 17,369,585. 12,686,236. Fees 2,180,482.0 1,897,299. ('� 1,621,734.110 1,015,000.05) Grand Total 36,250,515. 25,613,545. 18,991,319. 13,703,236. Construction 11 top Offi Option Two O_ ut" tin Four E Program 6 Months 6 Months 6 Months °'- Design/Construction Documents 8 Months 16 Months 8 Months 16 Months Construction 18 Months 18 Months 18 Months 18 Months Total 26 Months 40 Months 32 Months 40 Months NOTE: Each individual line item cost includes contractor Overhead and Profit, bonds, and insurance_ (11 lrcbe6u+.apuktgrr Pbn tsvd .adcmd Plm. c1 Iand.sties.enurnwv.n :n¢n. n. oe l� HIw'oue°"°"°°"r'°d"'p t2 CVA w°e("eW •,t.s'md, bGC .ipalr.a+, dd«t rs) (st leeu,a., c.eer Ism ei?).e.0.1km n em. h.ah .. (6) <-W'dd'd A of dt� Ya 20% CRQ JI at bAr•. (7) wd". b- altmrao* w1.n l�/s ;30.000 J.F. (s) h lam a.�r :r t�,o.,�r� n.n. vr.,a -A homer foe ee&ed (31 IxOedslidF1'+ka r..t N1,000 J.F.'ao,m6kq�.� dyed (10) O&Nre6 r 70%ar Ok*. A ZZ(k) k. o%uab (111 ImWece rum wru^�I+Mb 4¢ (1131 3) ( 7ncewue bvi lraor.M�or..ntr ra naeasri; ,ri.laa:Qil.»w.�i` -. ,�r �f4107..e. stew eir �.,m si ,vey E4 4 IL I. Negotiation for Revenue Retention A. Upon the effective date of withdrawal, the City assumes the responsibility for financing local public library service. B. The City must enter into negotiations with the county for the reallocation to the City of the property taxes previously collected within the City for County Library purposes. 1) The City needs to ascertain the amount of property tax money involved. 2) The City needs to negotiate for any remaining grant money or augmentation funds held by the County. II. Exploration of Other Funding Sources A. State grants B. Federal funds C. Mello -Roos Community Facilities District D. Special library tax III. organization of a Municipal Library A. Adoption of an establishing ordinance B. Appointment of a Board of Library Trustees C. Adoption of basic rules and regulations for the administration of the library IV. Withdrawal from the San Bernardino county Library A. Publication at least once a week for two successiva weeks prior to giving notice that the action of withdrawal from the County system is being contemplated. Notice should contain the date and place of the meeting at which the contemplated action is proposed to be taken. B. Notification of withdrawal must be given to the county Board of supervisors on or before January 1. This is Iq3 accompanied by a statement complying with Chapter 8 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 25 of the Government Code, C. Adoption of a resolution stating the City's intent to establish a municipal library - This is not necessary, but recommended by our Consultant. D. Adopt a detailed ordinance spelling out the specifics of the municipal library, its governance and other provisions. V. Interim operating Issues - Possible scenarios A. Contract with the County Library to continue service on a temporary basis S. Lease or otherwise contract for the continued use of the present facility C. Employ library staff to operate the library and contract with the County Library for use of the collections. D. continue contracting with the County for library service until the city can establish a new library in a temporary building operated by its own library personnel and stocked with its own collections. )yy l.11I Ur nAlNunv U UVA➢IViNkjA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 3, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Debbie Adams, City Clerk SUBJECT; REMOVAL OF CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM D5 a � �` 3I %n � t Please remove City Council Agenda item D5 from the Consent Calendar, as staff has requested this item be continued to the July 1, 1992 City Council meeting. /dja cc: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager �,�,k2Frfn D% RESOLUTION NO. 1(�-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 ", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System) (hereinafter referred to as the "District "); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next Fiscal Year. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct, SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 1994 -98 j IJ for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A ". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. 23 RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88 -2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency "), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the 'Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 ", being Chapter 2.5. Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement) (hereinafter referred to as the "District "); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. TC ION 22: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year 1992/93 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit W. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; and B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; and C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonal4e administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. ES C,I,ION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A ". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 EXHIBIT "A' The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 1992/93. SPECIAL TAX "A:'- DRAIN -!= FAC=M -- PROPERTY CATEGORIES There are two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A ", which are Identified as follows: I. DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax ASsessors's parcel for which property a building permit has been issued as of May 31 of any year. 2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERLY All other property, excluding property which, as of the date of the election to authorize the levy of Special Tax "A:, is: (I) owned by a public entity: III) owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for transmission or distribution purposes: or lid) zoned as open space. TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL TAR "A" RATES The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the authorized Special Tax "A" rates for Fiscal Year 1992/93 are as follows: Taixin¢ Classtficatio Tax Rate L DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class 1 $944 per year (More than 3,590 square feel of dwelling unit living area) D. Residential it 8699 per year (3,077 -3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) C. Residential iii 8524 per year (2,564 -3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living area) D. Residential Class IV $420 per year (2,308 -2.563 square feet of dwelling unit living areal Taxing Classification 2. E. Residential Class V (2.051 -2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) F. Residential Class VI (less than 2.051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) • Commercial or industrial property T :%DEVELOPED PROPERTY All Undeveloped Property Tax_ Raig $349 per year $245 per year 52,030 per acre per year •• $1.344 per acre per year ••• The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living space, exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the building permitls) issued for the dwelling unit. The acreage of a commercial or industrial property shall mean the gross acreage exclusive o: any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. The acreage of an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL. TAX "A" Special Tax "A' shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above Identified Property Categories so long as Special Tax "A' revenues are necessary to pay authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District related to the financing of authorized public facilities, which may Include. without limitation, payment of debt service on anv bonded Indebtedness of the Community Facilities District; replenishment of any required reserve fund for any such bonded indebtedness; funding of any required sinking fund necessary to pay for future public facilities or debt service; or direct payment for public facilities ICFD Expenses']. The annual levy of Special Tax "A" shall be apportioned as follows: STEP 1: The Community Facilities District shall estimate the amount of CFD Expenses which must be paid for from Special Tax "A" revenues collected during the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax 'A' levy is to be established (the "Required Special Tax 'A' Revenue'). STEP 2'. That equal percentage of the Special Tax "A" rate. not to exceed 91% of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate, applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate Special Tax 'X revenue In the Fiscal Year of the lew equal to the Required Special Tax W Revenue for such Fiscal Year shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 3: If additional Special Tax "A' revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue. that percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tae "A' rate applicable to all Undeveloped Property necessary to generate such additional Special Tax 'A' revenue shall be levied on all Undeveloped Property. STEP 4: If additional Special Tax 'A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special. Tax "A" Revenue, that equal percentage of the maximum authored Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 5: If additional Special Tax A' revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, the Community Facilities District shall: A. Compare (I) the Special Tax "A" rate which would be levied on each Developed Property combining STEP 2 and STEP 4 above with (it) the product resulting from multiplying the square footage of the Developed Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax "A ". The Base Maximum Special Tax "A" means an amount equal to $0.054 per square foot of the lot or parcel. B. if the product described in (ii) above exceeds the Special Tax W rate described in (I) above for any Developed Property, the Community Facilities District shall increase the Special Tax 'A:' rate levied on each such Developed Property in equal percentages up to the rate not to exceed the product described in (u) above necessary- to generate the additional Special Tax 'A" revenues to equal the Required Special Tax "A" Revenues. SPECIAL TAX "S' - LAW 0"RCEMEM All Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Tax ' B ". The authorized Special Tax B" rates for Fiscal Year 1992 -1993 are as follows: klk9iliRM7F.'RTilfGklidTil DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class 1 $1 per year (More than 3.590 square feet of dwelling unit living area) B. Residential Class 11 $1 per year (3.077 -3.589 square feet of dwelling unit living areal C. Residential Class Ili $1 per year (2,564 -3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living area) D. Residential Class W $1 per year (2.308 -2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) E. Residential Class V $1 per year (2,051 -2.307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) - F. Residential Class VI $1 per year (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1x "r Nom, S!Y 1! Y 1 O , 5 C. E. . G T . Tl•T�T�T. ''rte I a - , 1 2a IN ST EETT . ♦ +a.n 1. SCALE 1' a 640' LECCMQ_ + 1 xvn •�.. ,... !!r ti �� r [Nn Y30 > M m +n > u You; •i yv>r. a I "-23,0.761 I uR, :;Ir.r. v. y �ti u. vwY Y MYY1, v ; y. r •.�T :,R.'V Ft tl� >�+IK X.�.�. ti �� r [Nn Y30 > M m +n > u You; •i yv>r. a I "-23,0.761 I Roll Call: CITY OF RANCHO UrA MONGP, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA Adiourned Meeting June 4, 1992 - 6:00 p.m. Tri- Communities Conference Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California A, CALL TO ORDER Buquet __, Alexander _, Stout _, Williams _, Wright _. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 C, COMMUNICATION FROM THE PEI BLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency. State law prohibits the Redevelopment Agency from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Redevelopment Agency may receive testimony and s et the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limiled to five minutes per individual. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA June 4, 1992 Page 2 D. ADJOURNMENT 1, Debra J. Adams, Assistant Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 29, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. 1. Roll Call: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Adjourned Meeting June 4, 1992 - 6:00 p.m. Tri- Communities Conference Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California A. CALL TO ORDER Buquet _, Alexander __, Stout __, Williams _, Wright — DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 C. COMMUN /CATION FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. State law prohibits the District from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The District may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting, Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AGENDA June 4, 1992 Page 2 D. ADIOURNMF.NT 1, Debra J. Adams, Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 29, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. o� CITY OF RA�IICTIO C:U AM(X X A CITY COUNCIL U AGENM 1977 diourned Meeting June 4, 1992 - 6:00 p.m. Tri- Communities Conference Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California A, CALL TO ORDER I'. Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Roll Call: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, Williams _, Wright _. B. ITEM OF DISCUSSIOv DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 This is the time and place for Council. State the general public to address the City law prohibits the City Council not previously included on the Agenda. The from addressing any issue testimony and set the matter for a subsequent City meeting. Council may receive Comments be limited to fire minutes per individual. are to CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 4, 1992 Page 2 D. AD.IOURNMENT f, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 29, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.