HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992/06/17 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
June 17, 1992
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
City Councilmembers
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
William .J, Alexander, Councilmember
Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember
Diane Williams, Councilmember
Pamela J. Wright, Councilmember
Jack Lam, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Office: 989 -1851
0 City Council Agenda
PAGE
June 17, 1492
1
All Items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be In
writing. The deadline for submitting these items Is 5:00 p.m. on
the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office
receives all such Items.
A CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: 8uquet_, Alexander_, Stout._,
Williams ,, and Wright
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This Is the time and place for the general public to address the
City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any Issue not previously Included on the Agenda. The
City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a
subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes
per Individual.
D- CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar Items are expected to be routine
and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at
one time without discussion. Any Item may be removed by a
Counclimember or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: May 20, 1992 (Williams absent)
May 27,T992 (BUquet absent)
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/27/92, 6/3/92, and 6/10/92;
1
and Payroll ending 5/21/92 for the total amount of S 1,170,392.622.
3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of
16
May 31, 1992.
4. Approval to ardhorze the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids"
20
for the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation and Widening, from Fourth
Street to Foothill Boulevard," to be funded from Systems Fund,
Account No 22- 4637 -8936 and Federal Aid Urban (FAU) Fund,
Account No. 24 -4637 -8838.
�—
City Council Agenda
PAGE
June 17, 7992
2
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -187
21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'HAVE l
AVENUE REHABILITATION AND WIDENING, FR'.'
FOURTH STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD' IN
CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
5.
Approval to continue with representation by County Counsel in the
25
L.A. Cellular, etc., v. State Board of Equalaction, etc., of ai San
Francisco Superior Court No. 94 2131 matter.
6.
Approval of Sobriety Check Point Trailer and Materials.
26
7.
Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 92-
27
039) for 1992 Tree Planting Program, to Trautwein Construction, for
the amount of S48,723.00 ($44.293.48 plus 10% contingency), to be
funded from SBA Tree Grant, Account No. 124 - 4637 -6028,
8.
Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement for Installation
29
of a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility in connection
with development of Tract No. 10210, located across the
southeasterly project area connecting to the existing Almond
Interceptor Channel, submitted by First Hotel Investment
Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -189
30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
WIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION
OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM
DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH
DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO. 10210
9,
Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement for Installation
32
of a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility in connection
with development of Tract No. 13644, located In Vista Grove Street
from the westerly side of Hermosa Avenue to the easterly
property boundary, submitted by Reign Construction Company.
Incorporated for Woodridge Estates, Ltd.
City Council Agenda
PAGE
It June 17, 1992
3
RESOLUTION NO.92 -189
33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION
OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM
DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH
DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO. 13644
10. Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Street
35
Improvements and Dedication of Rights -of -Way at the southwed
corner of Vinmor Avenue and Ninth Street between Colistio
Gomez and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-190
I
36
A RESOLUTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION FROM CAUS110
GOMEZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
11. Approval to accept Landscape Improvements Only and Notice
37
of Completion for Tract 13566 -1, located on the south side of
Summit Avenue between Wardman Bullock Road and San
Sevoine Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-191
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13566-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE HUNG OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E CONSENT OFIDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of
flrnt reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and
non - controversial They will be acted upon by the Council at one
time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any
Item can be removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
PAGE
0 City Council Agenda
June 17, 1992
4
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following Items have been advertised and /or posted as public
hearings as required by low. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 1991 UNIFORM
38
cooES
ORDINANCE NO. 497 (first reading)
40
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CHAPTERS 15.04, 15.08, 15.12. 15.16. 15.20, 15.28, 15.32,
15.36, 15 40, AND 15.44 OF TITLE 15, BUILDINGS AND
CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE
"UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ", 1991 EDITION;
'THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE', 1991 EDITION,
INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THERETO; THE
'UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS', 1991
EDITION; THE 'UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE ", 1991
EDITION, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES; THE "UNIFORM
PLUMBING CODE ", 1991 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL
APPENDICES: THE 'UNIFORM CODE FOR THE
ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS '. 1991
EDITION; THE "UNIFORM HOUSING CODE', 1991
EDITION; THE 'UNIFORM BUILDING SECURITY CODE ",
1991 EDITION; AND THE "UNIFORM SIGN CODE ", 1991
EDITION; WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS,
DELETIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO SAID CODES,
INCLUDING PENALTIES
2. CONSIDERATION TO ORDER THE VACATION OF THE EXISTING ALLEY
87
EXTENDING FROM RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE TO SAN
BERNARDINO ROAD (LO(ATED SOUTH OF AND GENERALLY
PARALLEL TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD)
RESOLUTION NO. 92.192
92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, ORDERING TO
BE VACATED AN EXISTING ALLEY EXTENDING FROM
RED HILL COUNTY CLUB DRIVE TO SAN BERNARDINO
ROAD (LOCATED SOUTH OF AND GENERALLY
PARALLEL TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD)
City Council Agenda
fo
PAGE
June 17, 1992
5
3. ONSIDERADON TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND
106
109
RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL EW OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN TH
PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (85 -PD) FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
RESOLUTION NO. 92-193
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND
RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85 -PD
(HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS)
4 CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND
123
129
RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL EVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS 1 2. 3q 3B- g 5 6 7
AND 8 FOR FISCAI YEAR 1992/93
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -194
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2. 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7
AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PURSUANT TO
THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN
CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2,3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8
5. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND
195
197
RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL LEW OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS 1 2 't q 5, 6, 7 AND
8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992193
RESOLUTION NO. 92-195
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN
CONNECTION WITH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8
PAGE
0 City Council Agenda
.lone 17, 1992
6
6. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL
287
USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGc - Appeal of the Planning
Commission's denial of a request to expand the hours of
operation on Fridays for an existing 103,552 square foot indoor
wholesale /retail commercial use located within the Generol
Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at
11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229- 262 -20. (Continued from June 3, 1992)
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -180
328
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A
MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 91-
03, PART C, FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE HOURS OF
OPERATION ON FRIDAYS. LOCATED IN THE GENERAL
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229- 262 -28
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following Items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9.24 220
331
332
REQUIRING CONTINUING EDUCATION TO RENEW MASSAGE
TECHNICIAN PERMITS
ORDINANCE NO.485-A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
SECTION 9.24 220 OF CHAPTER 9.24 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
RENEWAL OF MASSAGE TECHNICIAN LICENSES
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following Items do not legally require any public testimony,
aitnough the Chair may open the meeting for public Input.
1. REPORT ON ORAL HISTORY PROJECT (Oral Report)
2, GONSIDFRATION OF A RESOLUTIO. N REQUESTIN � THE STATE
332
L F -.IS AT IR R J T PROPOSALS TO REDUCE MUNICIPALNDING
PAGE
City Council Agenda
June 17, 1992
7
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -196
334
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING ON
THE LEGISLATURE OK THE STATE OF CALIFORNiA TO
REJECT PROPOSALS TO REDUCE LEVELS OF FUNDING
FOR MUNICIPALITIES BELOW CURRENT LEVELS
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following Items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing Items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This Is the time for City Council to Identify the Items they wish
to discuss at the next meeting. These Items will not be discussed
at this meeting, only Identified for the next meeting.
K COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the
City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any Issue not previously Included on the Aqenda. The
City Council may r':elve testimony and set the matter for a
subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes
per Individual.
L ADJOURNMENT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS
PP.OPERTY ACQUISITION AND PERSONNEL MATTERS.
EXECUTIVE SESSION TO ADJOURN TO BUDGET WORKSHOP TO
BE HELD ON JUNE 18, 1992 IN THE TRI- COMMUNITIES
CONFERENCE ROOM OF THE CIVIC CENTER, AT 6:00 P.M.
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
Certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on
June 12, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic. Center Drive.
May 20, 1992
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May
20, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at
7:16 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II (arrived
7:20 p.m.), Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Ralph Hanson, Assistant City
Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community
Development Director, Brad Buller, City Planner; Otto Rroutil, Deputy City
Planner; Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Bob
Zetterberg, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Jana
Ellie, Di seater Preparedness Specialist; Vivian Garcia, Secretary; rnnrid Blair,
GIs Supervisor; Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer; Duane Baker,
Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst 11; Susan Mickey,
Management Analyst I; chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J.
Adams, City Clerk.
Absent was Councilmember: Diane Williams
B ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of Proclamation to Joe Schultz for his service to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
Mayor Stout stated Joe Schultz, Community Services Director, was leaving Rancho
Cucamonga for a position in another area. He asked that his plaque be forwarded
to him since he was not present for this meeting.
B2. Presentation of Proclamation Recognizing May 17 through May 23, 1992 as
National Public Works Week.
Mayor Stout presented the proclamation to Bob Zetterberg and coamented on the
great job the maintenance staff does.
City Council Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 2
f,11ARf
Councilmember August arrived at 7:20 p.m.
Rl RiR1
C COMMUNICATIOMS FROM WHO PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. May 6, 1992, and Payroll ending April
23, 1992, for the total amount of $647,259.81.
D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30,
1992.
D3. Approval to authorizR the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bide" for the
construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Vineyard Avenue at Arrow
Rout., to be funded from TDA Article 8 Fund, Account No. 12- 4637 -9102.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -154
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT
VINEYARD AVENUE AT ARROW ROUTE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D4. Approval of a resolution as recommended by the Public Safety Commission
relating to emergency medical services.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -155
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING LOCAL CONTROL OF EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICE DELIVERY AND THE FIRE DISTRICT'S ROLE AS THE
PRIMARY PROVIDER FIRST RESPONDER IN DELIVERING EMERGENCY
MEDICAL CARE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
D5. Approval to name persona authorized to execute on behalf of the City the
application for obtaining federal financial assistance under P.L. 93 -288
involving the February, 1992 floods.
City Council Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -156
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NAMING PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY THE APPLICATION FOR OBTAINING FEDERAL
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER P.L. 93 -288 INVOLVING THE FEBRUARY,
1992 FLOODS
D6. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the
proposed Rancho Cucamonga High School Mitigation Project for the Rochester Avenue
East Side Parkway from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue and Issuance of a
Categorical Exemption therefore.
RESOLUTION? NO. 92 -157
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL
STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED
RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL MITIGATION PROTECT FOR THE
ROCHESTER AVENUE EAST SIDE PARKWAY
D7. Approval to authorize the Annual Levy of an Assessment Management Fee for
the collection of as.eeament. within the Alta Loma Channel District (84 -2), the
Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund District (82 -1R), the Rancho Cucamonga
Drainage District (86 -2) and Milliken South of Array District (89 -1). ITEM
REMOVFO FOR DISCUSSION RY COUNCILEMEER WRIGHT.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -158
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT
SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
D8. Approval of Parcel Map 13755, located between Terra Vista Parkway and
Spruce Avenue, north of Church Street, submitted by the Central School District.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -159
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 13755
D9. Approval to award and authorize the execution of Citywide Concrete Repair
Contract (CO 92 -G33) to I'abar Construction in the amount of $61,000.00, to be
funded by Account Number 01 -4647 -6028 for Fiscal Year 1991/92.
City Council Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 4
DID. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 92 -034) for
Rochester Avenue Street Improvements, located from Victoria Park Lane to Highland
Avenue, and Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Installation project at the
intersection of Highland and Rochester Avenues to Summit Grading and Paving
Incorporated, for the amount of $528,103.95 ($480,094.50 plus 108 contingency)
to be funded from the following accounts: TDA Article I. 12- 4637 -9101, TDA Local
Measure I, 32- 4637 -9111, Systems 35- 4637 -9108, and RDA 11 -5010.
Dll. Approval to execute Program Supplement No. 018 (CO 92 -035) to Local Agency
- State Agreement No. 08 -5420 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State
of California for the construction phase including advertisement, award and
administration of the Rehabilitation and Widening of Haven Avenue from 4th Street
to Foothill Boulevard. The supplement sate the Federal portion of the project
at $916,941.00 and the City's portion at $119,059.00 with the provision to
Increase the City's portion should the need arise. Funding for the supplement
agreement shall be from Transportation Development Fees.
ABSOLUTION NO. 92 -160
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTfiORIEING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING
OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 018 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STATE
AGREEMENT NO. 08 -5420 FOR TEE CONSTRUCTION PHASE INCLUDING
ADVERTISEMENT, AWARD AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE REHABILITATION
AND WIDENING OF HAVEN AVENUE FROM 4TH STREET TO FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD
D12. Approval to accept Easement Acquisition Agreement (00 92 -036) between Janet
G. Bauer and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the purchase of right -of -way for
Lark Drive in the amount of $124,200.00 and cover additional expenses amounting
to $5,486.50 to be funded from Account Number 22- 3901 -7441.
D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13316,
located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Carrari Street, submitted
by Friedman Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -161
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13316
D14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 9350,
located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, submitted
by William Lyon Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -162
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 9350
City council Minotes
May 20, 1992
Page 5
D15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 11838,
located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane,
submitted by the William Lyon Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 52 -163
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11838
D16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tracts 13117 and 13118,
located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Banyan Street.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (TR 13117) $ 61,500.00
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (TR 13118) $ 80,000.00
D17. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for the storm drain within
Tract 13304, locates on the northwest corner of Mountain View Drive and Terra
Vista Parkway.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Storm Dr) $ 61,615.00
D18. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13697, located on
the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Carrari Street.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 67,900.00
D19. Approval to set a Public Hearing on .Tune 17, 1992 to hear a request to
vacate the existing alley extending from Red Hill Country Club Drive to San
Bernardino Road (located south of and generally parallel to Foothill Boulevard),
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -164
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AN
ALLEY EXTENDING FROM RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE TO SAN
BERNARDINO ROAD (LOCATED SOUTH OF AND GENERALLY PARALLEL TO
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD) - APN: 207 - 113 -18 THROUGH 24
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to approve the Consent Calendar
with the exception of Item 07. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Williams).
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D7. Approval to authorize the Annual Levy of an Assessment
Management Fee for the collection of assessments within the Alta Loma Channel
District (84 -2), the Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund District (82 -1R), the
Rancho Cucamonga Drainage District (86 -2) and Milliken South of Arrow District
(89 -1).
Councilmember Wright stated she did not want any increases in assessments unless
the matter went to a vote of the reuidsnts.
City Council Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -158
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT
SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
NOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 92 -158.
Motion carried 3 -1 -1 (Wright no, Williams absent).
No items submitted.
f ♦ • R ♦ R
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
f ♦ R i R
' 'dL 4LLe
PI. A 7 -
LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - Appeal of Conditions of Approval requiring (1)
construction of off -site street improvements from the site to Church Street, and
(2) construction of a portion of the Master Planned Storm Drain Syetem No. 6 from
the site to Day Creek Channel to create a 1.31 acre parcel in the Terra Vista
Planned Community at the southwest corner of Rase Line Road and Rochester Avenue
- APN: 227- 151 -17. Staff report presented by Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council
was:
Don Thompson, Lewis Homes, stated they felt this parcel was not considered
when the City's policy was adopted. He stated they would be willing to do
these improvements in time as their project wan built, and added he did
not agree with staff's recommendation.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated there was not a Resolution granting the appeal
because staff felt they were proceeding as Council had directed in their policy.
He stated if Council wanted something different, they would bring back another
Resolution.
Councilmember Buquet asked if runoff had been calculated.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated the runoff amount is very small and did not
warrant the size of the master storm drain pipe.
Councilmember Buquet asked if at the time the curb and gutters are installed,
could they put in whatever is necessary for a future tie -in of the storm drain
system.
City Council Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 7
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes they could do this.
Mayor Stout stated he understood Lewis Homes would go along with staff's
recommendation and would be willing to go along with this plan by doing the work
within two vests of the occupancy of the station, but was concerned about the
bonds to complete the infrastructure around the regional shopping center site,
including the intersection of Church Street. He stated he would accept Hr.
Thompson'e compromise with the exception that the triggering mechanism should be
two years or the commencement of the City'e project that affects Church, or
whichever occurs first as (for the street and the storm drain for the CFD
project).
Councilmember Buquet suggested that Lewis Homes get together with staff to work
out an amenable method no that both the City and Lewis are happy with the
solution.
councilmember Wright stated she agreed.
Joe O'Neil, city Engineer, felt bonds should he posted with definite time frames,
and added this would come back to the Council at the next meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -165
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TENS CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST TO MODIFY TWO
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987 TO
CREATE A 1.31 ACRE PARCEL IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED
COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD
AND ROCHESTER AVENUE - APN: 227- 151 -17
ACTION, To case back at the June 3 Council meeting under the CCnsent Calendar
for approval.
F2. CONSIDBAATION OP ENVIAONNENTAL ASSESSI{gL7T ANg INDUSTRIAL AREA SPACIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 92 -02 - JACK MASI
A. A request to modify the local circulation pattern within Subarea 7,
along Rochester Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and the Sports
Park, to accommodate a proposed industrial development at the
southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN:
229 - 011 -10, 19, 21, 26, 27 and 26.
B. A request to add an auto court use, consisting of automotive
service. and related activities, as a conditionally permitted use to
Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
C. A request to expand the list of permitted and conditionally
permitted uses in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to
include certain retail and aervice- related activities.
City Council Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page S
The Planning Commiesion recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
Staff report presented by Beverly Niseen, Associate Planner.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council
were:
John Mannerino, 9333 Bane Line Road, 0110, stated he represents the Masi
family. He added the architect, broker and project coordinator, and Mr.
and Mrs. Masi, owners of the property, were all present. He stated they
agreed with Parts A and B of the item, but stated they did not agree with
Part C. He stated they would like to have the addition of one item as a
conditionally permitted use of specialty building supplies and home
improvements be added to Part C.
Mr. Nye, broker, Bishop Hawk, spoke about the project stating that Rancho
Cucamonga residents have to go out of the area for certain services at the
present time. He mentioned various business establishments that have
shown an interest in leasing space at this location if Part C is changed.
John Mannerino asked that the City Council approve Parts A and B and asked
for a modification of Part C an he suggested above.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Mayor Stout stated he felt Parts A and B were okay.
Councilmember Wright stated this particular item had sane unusual things about
it that require special attention. She felt the historical requirements put on
this piece and the location require special attention. She felt the sport.
complex and regional mall, apd the idea that what they are doing 1s a
transitional idea to begin with. She felt there was transition within this piece
in itself. She felt they have done a good job at this and felt they have done
a good job at addressing the special circumstances of this corner. She stated
she did not have any problem with the suggested changes by Mr. Mannerino.
Councilmember Alexander stated he agreed with Councilmember Wright's comments.
Councilmember Buquet stated he would go along with the suggestion. made.
Mayor Stout stated he wanted this site to be successful, but felt the key to this
particular site is the corner you first see as you approach it from the mall
Ride. He felt the building on the corner is weak as you approach it and felt it
had a strip center appearance to the rear of it. He suggested this be looked at.
Ralph Hanson, Assistant City Attorney, stated in order to go forward with the
first reading of the Ordinance, the following changes needed to be made to the
Ordinancei
1) In the title, second to the last line after Subarea 7, add; "and
Specialty Building Supplieu and Home Improvements an a conditionally
permitted tine within Subarea 7 ".
City Council Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 9
2) Section 3, second line, after the word Court, add: "and Specialty
Building Supplies and Home Improvements ".
3) Section 4, second line after the word Court, add: "and Specialty Building
Supplies and Mote Improvements ".
4) After section 4, just prior to section 5, add: -Soecialty Buildi
Supolies and Home Improvements: Activities typically include but are not
limited to: retail and wholesale ealee and installation of specialty
items such as paint, wall /floor /window coverings, doors and windows,
building materials, hardware, plumbing and electrical supplies, bath and
kitchen fixtures and supplies, lighting, swimming pools and supplies, and
garden furnishings, materials and supplies. Activities Shall be conducted
in enclosed buildings of 25,000 square feet or lose. Uses excluded from
this category are general merchandise stores."
5) In table III -1, under commercial at the bottom of that Section, add:
"Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements".
6) In exhibit "C", under Conditional Uses, after Automotive Service Court,
add: "Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements".
Debra J. Adams read the title of Ordinance No. 496 as amended.
ORDINANCE NO. 496 )first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 92 -02, PARTS A 6 P ELIMINATING DESIGNATED ACCESS
POINTS ALONG ROCHESTER AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND
ARROW ROUTE, AND ADDING AN "AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE COURT" USE
CONSISTING OF AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES AS A
CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN SUBAREA 7, RESPECTIVELY -
APN: 229 - 011-10, 19, 21, 26, 27 AND 28
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -166
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, PART C, TO
EXPAND THE LIST OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES
IN SUBAREA 7 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
NOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading and set second
reading for June 3, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Wllliama absent).
The Council concurred that Resolution No. 92 -166 Should be withdrawn if the Masi
legal counsel concurred.
The Masi legal counsel concurred.
City Council Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 10
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
G1. CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY FIRST HEADING AND SETTING DATE FOR PUBLIC
HEARING - ADOPTION OF UNIFORM CODES Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City
Manager.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was clnsed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 497.
ORDINANCE NO. 497 (preliminary reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04, 15.08, 15.12,
15.16, 15.20, 15.28, 15.32, 15.36, 15.40, AND 15.44 OF TITLE
15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE "UNIFORM
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ", 1991 EDITION{ "THE UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE ", 1991 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THERETO) THE
"UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS ", 1991 EDITION, THE "UNIFORM
MECHANICAL CODE ", 1991 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES
THERETO, THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE ", 1991 EDITION, INCLUDING
ALL APPENDICES) THE "UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF
DANGEROUS BUILDINGS ", 1991 EDITION, THE "UNIFORM HOUSING
CODE ", 1991 EDITION, THE "UNIFORM BUILDING SECURITY CODE ",
1991 EDITION; AND THE "UNIFORM SIGN CODE ", 1991 EDITION, WITH
CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO
SAID CODES, INCLUDING PENALTIES
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to accept the preliminary
reading, waive full reading, and set first reading along with the public hearing
for June 17, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Williams absent).
G2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE NSTMLISHING U TO DECLARE A DOG A9
VICIOU�j Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager.
Mayor Stout opined the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
Debra J. Adams read the title of Ordinance No. 498.
ORDINANCE NO. 498 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 6.04 TO THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS
AND /OR VICIOUS DOGS
City Council Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 11
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading and set
second reading for June 3, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Williams
absent).
• x e • a
G3. CONSIDERATION TO ?,MENP THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION ORDINANCE
Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II.
Mayor Stout corm anted that he and Councilmember Wright served as the subcommittee
for this Commission., and that the changes recommended to the Ordinance are their
suggestions.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 307 -B.
ORDINANCE NO. 307 -B (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, amending chapter 2.28 OF THE! RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT COMMISSION TO REFLECT THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE FIVE,
TERMS OP TWO AND YOUR YEAR APPOINTMENTS, AND THE REMOVAL OF
JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS WITH THE CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Stout to waive full reading and set
second reading for June 3, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Williams
absent).
No items submitted.
NO items Submitted.
E. CITY MANAOER'E STAFF REPORTS
I. COUNCIL @y�9INF96
J. IDENTIFICATION OF
No items were identified for the next meeting.
No communication was made from the public.
City Council Minutes
May 20, 1992
Page 17.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buqust to recess to Executive Session
to discuss personnel matters, labor relations and pending litigation pertaining
to property acquisition. The Executive Session would adjourn to a joint meeting
with Cucamonga County Water District on May 27, 1992, 7:00 p.m. in the Rains
Room. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Williams absent). The Council recessed
at 8:09 p.m., not to reconvene until May 27, 1992.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Mama, CMc
City Clerk
Approved:
May 27, 1992
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
,(Quit Mating of the City council
and .ucwmonc+ =1ty Water District
A joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Cucamonga County Water District was held on
Wednesday, May 27, 1992, in the Rains Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councitmembers: William I. Alesander, Dune Williams, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L.
Stout.
Also present were: lack Lam, City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Joe O'Neil, City
F,nginwr. James Frost, City Treasurer, and Ian Sutton. Deputy City Clerk.
Absent was Councilmember, Charles J. Buquet It.
Present from Cucamonga County Water District were: George Kuykendall, President: Jerry Wilson, Vice - President,
Jeff Carter, Boardmember; Bob Neufeld. Boardmember, Charlic West, Boardmember; and Tom Shollenberger,
Gencml Marwger.
r.rrr.
B. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION
BL LaMSMN OF RECLAIMED WATER
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated when the construction project for the Sports Complex was
awarded, it included lour xhl alternates, one of which was infmsWeture for the reclaimed water system, He stated the
two .systems have been installed, and when reclaimed water becomes available for use, they can go in and hook up
the piping for the irrigation systems.
Jack lam, City Manager, thought Councilmember Buquet was looking for an update on this topic subsequent to
their muting last year.
Mayor Stow deferred discussion on this item until later in the meeting to give Couneilmember Buquet a chance to
join them,
Y4444�
Item B2 was discussed at this time, but the minutes will remain in agenda order.
City Council /Cucamonga County City Council/Cucamonga County
Water District Minutes Water District Minutes
May 27, 1992 May 27, 1992
Page 2 Page 2
Bob Neofold, Boardmcmbor, stated he represented CCWD on the Chino Basin Policy Committee, and the use of
reclaimed water is a constant topic of discussion. He stated them would be reclaimed water, but it would probably be
3 -5 years before it was available in this area. He stated CCWD's position is that the water that is treated is based
upon CCWD's water sources, so they feel it is basically their water, and they pay Chino Basin to treat dmt water.
S'hey felt they were entitled to recover that water. The current problem is that the water is treated at RPI in pmario
and and would have to be pumped uphill for use, which would be very expensive, but when RP4 comes on line, it
would be more economical in utilize reclaimed water in this area,
Mayer Stout felt that Courcilmember Buaael's concem was that there was a lot of new construction being planned
in that area that could be hooked up for reclaimed water, but they would also need to know the cost involved because
if it was too expensive, people would not want to change over.
Jerry Wilson, CCWD, stated he is can the Engineering Committee, and they arc in the process of coming up with a
new master plan for sewer and water, and reclaimed water is a topic under study for the new master plan it would
be approximately nine months Wore they could answer questions about the cost involved.
President Kuykendall, CCWD, felt this was a growth area for them, and that the demand would be [hare for recturned
water.
B2. DISCUSSION- QF WATER RATES AND IVUW {F RATE IA4_=
President Kuykendall CCWD. stated it was brought to their attention a year ago when they had a rate increase that it
put the City at a disadvantage because of lack of planning on their pan on how it would affect the, City. He stated
there would be increases in the future, and felt they needed a mechanism to apprise the City of [he increases so they
could plan for it in their budget.
Jack tam. City Manager, stated CCWD traditionally raises it rates at the beginning of the calendar year, but the City
operates on a fiscal yearstarting Jury i of each year. He stated the City is the largest water user, and the majority of
the costs are borne by Assessment Districts. He explained about the public hearing process held in June for
increasing the amount collected in the Districts, and how an increase in the middle of the fiscal year adversely affects
the City.
Boardmemher Wilson asked if once an amount is determined for an Assessment District. can the City go back and
make an adjustment if the water rates am raised in January.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated because the amounts have to be submitted for the tax rolls by August I, they cannot
go back and adjust those at a later date. He .spoke about the situation the Council went through last year at the
public hearing for the Aswssment Districts, and that a large part of the expense for those Districts is the cost of the
water.
James Frost, City Treasurer, stated when the Water District approves a rate increase in January, it is not put on the
tax roll until August for tax bills that we issued in November or Dcecmher, so the City does not resolve the revenue
until April of the following year, and has to carry that increase from the General Fund for approximately a year
Mom it can recover those funds.
President Kuykendall, CCWD, stated they have also hero having financial difficulties due to the slow down of
development, and the conservation efforts practiced by the private community.
City CounciVCucamonga County
Water District Minutes
May 27, 1992
Page 3
City Council/Cucamonga County
Water District Minutes
May 27, 1992
Page 3
Mayor Stout asked for an explanation of the water ate structure and the change that was made from charging the
City an agricultural rate to a residential ate.
fora Shollenberger, CCWD, staled with the change in the community itself from an agricultural community to an
urban development, the rate structure of the domestic dwellings have been subsidizing the agricultural muss. He
sated they have always delivered potable drinking water to the customers of the community, but at one dine there
was an untreated, canyon source of water available that was qualified for agriculmml use, so the rate was suppressed.
He sated now that there is only one legitimate source of water, and it comes from the same source no matter what
its end use, it has become unfair for the residents to subsidize the agricultural ate, thus the Board decided to stop the
subsidy. He stated the agricultural ale is being phased out, but it will take another year before the agricultural rate
is brought up to parity with the domestic ate.
Councilmember Alexander asked if the City were to establish a strong water conservation program, then would the
ra" automatically go up to cover the difference.
Boardmember Ncufe!d, CCWD, stated the City has cut its water usage signi0cantly over the last year compared to
previous years, and they do keep that in mind .since the City is the largest customer. He stated there arc a lot of
onside influences that affect them and their costa. He stated their largest expenditure is electricity for pumping the
water and treating it. He stated as of two and a half years ago they had to start purchasing water from the
Metropolitan Water District (MWD) which has increased their cost.
Tom Shollenberger, CCWD. explained how MWD arrives at their rate swcture and how it affects their users. He
smmd MWD is looking at a standardized policy of adopting a regimented .step increase of a seven year, 547.00 per
acre foot per year increase. He stated their price for non -interrupable water is $222.00 per acre (IML As of July 1
that will go up $67.00 dollars. He sated if next year MWD adopts the standardization of price, it will go up another
547.00 for the next seven years,
Cnuncilmember Alexander asked how many acre feet floes the City currently use
Joe O'Neil. City Engineer, stated it was 898 million gallons.
Tom Shollenberger, CCWD. sated that would be over I million cubic feet. He stated they buy the water in bulk so
them is a different rate structure involved, but they sell it in n!1.L. feel
Councilmembcr Alexander asked if they had an estimate of what their next increase would be so they could figure
that into their upcoming budget-
President Kuykendall, CCWD, stated they were just starting on that process now and were a little behind because
they just recently had to replace their Chief Financial Officer, He thought they were looking at an H -9'yr, increase at
the staw level. and there would prnbahly he an additional incmassc tan top of that for operating expenses.
Mayor Stout asked why were the rates set in January, and not in June at the end of the fiscal year.
President KuykendalL COWD, stated January has the lowest usage so it is more palatable to the conanmcr to get an
increase tun.
Mayor Stout stated they were going to have a problem because they have not accounted for any budget increase other
than what are in the Assessment Districts, so when they set their rates in June they will be off to start with.
City Council/Cucamonga County
City CounciWucamonga County
Water District Minutes
Water District Minutes
May 27, 1992
May 27, 1992
Page 4
Page 4
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated they have accounted for the increase that occurred this past
January, but not for the one in January 1993, which would make their calculadmis off again, especially if them was
the .stxoxl increase which was discussed earlier.
Jack Lam, City Manager, asked if CCWD was still holding to the policy of deferring any increases until July for
public agencies. He stated if they did not, it would automatically put them in the red because !hey could not pats
that increase along undI they have the public hearing six months later.
President Kuykendall, CCWD. asked if the City had to know the actual number involved.
Mayor Stout, stated yes. He explained the laws that govern how tax miss arc set for Assessment Districts and again
how the City does not actually collect the revenues until six m nine months after they are set at the public hearing.
He stated they would need to know projected increases as soon as possible so they can be calculated into the public
hearing process.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated they have added in one increase to be considered at the public hearing but were not
aware there might be a second one. He stated information has already been sent to the public regarding the proposed
rates for next year. He went over the circumstances that have lead to the water rates being such an issue now for the
Assessment Districts.
Mayor Stout stated it could be worse next year because them is proposed legislation that would require increased
noticing to every one in an Assessment District M days in advance of the pubic hearing, which if passed, would
mean the City would need figures from the Water District even sooner in order to calculate their rates.
Tom Shollenxrger, CCWD, clarified the procedure currently used by the District, and stated they arc considering
setting up a rate structure for the Board to use as a planning tool, so they will probably have a rate structure similar
to MW D in that they would have percentages calculated for a four or five year period, and that way City staff would
have figures available in order to calculate their budget
Jack Lam. City Manager, felt that would work as long as the payment was stilled deferred to July for the City.
The Council and the Board discussed the different aspects involved in estimating increases and the legal requirements;
of setting rates in Asses °ncnt Districts, and pa;mer.t precedures between the public and the City, and the City and
the Water District.
Jack Lam, City Manager, explained how each Assessment District was calculated and that they could not adjust with
a eeneral factor because of differences within the Districts.
Boardmember Ncufeld, CCWD, suggested possibly the Water District could take over the billing of water for the
Assessment Districts instead of the City.
Bowdmcm" Wilson, CCWD. thought that might not be a bad idea. that maybe they could put the water charges for
the Assessment Districts on the water bills for each of 'he affected households.
President Kuykendall, CCWD, felt twff could imk ;iaa that suggcaron. He clarified that the City could not
accrxnmodwe a rate incease to January in heir current financial .situation if payment were not deferred.
lack Lam, City Manager, stated that was correct, that the Assessment Districts could no accommodate an increase in
die midd!o of Nc fiscal year.
City CounciUCucamonga County City CounciWucamonga County
Waur District Minul s Water District Minutes
May 27, 1992 May 27, 1992
Page 5 Page 5
President Kuykendall, %CWD, suggested that Tom Shollenberger work with lack Lam and City staff to work out
the best mechanism for hacdling rate increases.
The Council and Board discussed the water table and how the recent rains affected its le eel, and how the fault line
protects the northern b,isln from the nitrams that are leaching into the Chino basir :c the suth. They also discussed
how the Water District has planned for growth in this area and how to meet Nose m:rcasA accds.
Councilmember Alexander stated Chino Basin Municipal Water District advised thew costs were greatly affected by
environmental regulations, and asked if CCWD had the same situation.
President Kuykendall, CCWD, sated regulations do add to their costs, but it was not a huge amount at this time.
lack Lam, City Manager, felt both agencies reacted to deal with the stormwater run -off regulations and permit
process, and since the City did not have anything in place in handle the billing aspect of those regulations, possibly
more might be an opportunity for the Water District to help in that area
Tom Sholienbcrger, CCWD, sated he did not know how effective their billing system would be, but they could
look into that, He thought the City might also want to check with Chino Basin Municipal Water District as they
might be more closely linked to dealing with waste water.
Mayor Smut fell it might be had to deal with Chino Basin since they work on a regional level, and might not want
to set up a system just for one City.
Tom Shollenborger, CCWD, sated he would be willing to work with City staff to explore options for dealing with
storm water permitting costs.
•.nor
The Council and Board discussed hem B i at this time, but the minutes will remain in agenda order.
rrnrr
63. D>,('1155I0\ OP I7'BMS OF MUTUAL IYTERECT
Boaldmember Ncumld. CCWD, sated there are proposals that am presented in the legislature that are geared towards
entities such as the Water District but would have impacts on the City also, which the City might not be aware of,
and vice versa. He fell there might be opportunities whem they could work in conjunction on legislative bills for
the benefit of both agencies.
lack Lam, City Manager, stated there is an active legislative program at the City, and that staff would be willing in
work in conjunction with the Water District on appropriate legislation.
President Kuvkendall, CCWD, slated he would like to sce that handled on the staff level.
The Council and Board discussed further options for working together on legislative issues and the problems
encoamtered m the .sate level.
rrrrrr
City Council/Cucamonga County City Council/Cucamonga County
Water District Minutes Water District Minutes
May 27, 1992 May 27, 1992
Page 6 Page 6
C, COMMU XCA11ONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Cl. James Frost, City Treasurer, thought they might want to look into having a special districts representative
on the SANBAG board.
... rt+
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 4 -0 -1 (Buquet
absent). The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p,m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jan Sutton
Deputy City Clerk
Approved:
C'IY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FCR PERIOD: 05-27 -92 (91/92)
................................................•.....•...••......••............•..
RUN DATE:
05129/92
.................
V(NDOR
...........
MANE
......................•...••.........•....•
.............c.................
ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO
................................ v a o•.........
WARR. 'AT.
v•........ a....•....•...
4. CHELAN
CYERLAP
714
FLORIO, JOAN
STALE GATED CV- ENIERED IN ERROR
54094.
41.51
<:( 54095 -
61336 »>
2921
L C.B.O.
TECHANICAL TRAIN
6713T.
30.00
744
GREAT EAi WESTERN SAVI46S
EMP PO GEE RNEO COMP /PPE 5111192
67138•
7.398 -00
<<< 61139 -
67221 »>
3445
GIL GUSTAVO
HARPSICHORO MUSIC(BROWN BAG CONCERT
672120
150.00
3450
RODRIGUEZ, JCSE
ENTERTAINMENT (SENIOR EVENT)
61223•
320.00
(<< 6TZ24 -
Sias 3))
6009
1992 NATIONAL O.A.R.E.
D.A.R.E. CONE. M PLAMOMDON 7/14 -18 4
67226
24U.00
3446
3 -0 BANNER SYSTEMS INC.
BANNERS FOR 4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION*
67227
1.299.00
2132
ABC BONGED ICCKSMITHS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4
67228
522.90
14
ACTION TRAVEL ALENCT
IIRF.RE M. PLIMONOON 7114 -lB A
67229
741 -00
2839
ADIRONDACK CIRECT
REPLACEMENT GLIDES FOR TA6245 CARD
61230
69.00
1135
ALIGNMENT I BRAKE SPECIALISTS
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 0630 K
61231
248.00
3191
ALMBLAD, KEN E.
INSTRUCTOR C- E.R.T. CL 95 5 /19
6T232
15.00
3203
ALPHA DESIGN £ GRAPHICS
1992 SUMMER GRAPEVINE
61233
9.205.89
6805
AMBRD, RCBERT
ADULT TENNIS REFUND RCT 48510 4
61234
60.00
2042
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY - JACK LAM
67235
44.90
24
ARBOR NURSERY INC.
VARIOUS PLANTS
67236
1.210.03
6806
AUSTIN DIVERSIFIED PRODUCT
DVERPAVNENT OF BUS. LIC. 020780
61231
60.00
34:3
AUTO C TRUCK GLASS
VEHICLE MAIMTNANCE UNIT 4316
67238
116.19
3419
BALL INDUSTRIES
SAFESTEP SORBENT FOR SPILLS
67239
1.280.01
33
BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE
GATE UICnVn IMGE S /NAILSV SCPA PER 4
61240
377.63
3227
BAYLESS STATIONERS
OFFICE SUPPLIES 4
61241
644.38
1338
BIG 1 AUTO PARTS
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 8616 4
67242
638.76
41
BISHOP COMPANY
WIRE FACESHIELD /VISOR Y /YINOOY
67Z13
191.67
1241
BLAKE PAPER CO.. INC.
SUPPLIES FOR SR. FIESTA A
67244
193.77
6307
BOCK, KEITH
ADULT TENNIS REFUND RCT 49533
67245
15.00
1031
BOLIN MAINT. C JANITORIAL, JOHN
JANITORIAL SVCS CITY MALL OFFICES 0
6TZ46
16.132.00
2964
BONADIMAM -Mc CAIN. INC.
PROGRESS PAYMENT *6 4
6T217
45.100.34
6808
BORSTEIN ENTERPRISES
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIE. 49575
67240
214.4D
6133
BROWNELL, STEPHEN
TRAVEL ADVANCE NATIONAL DARE COME.
61149
110.00
057
C R G HEATING £ AIR CONDITIONING
MODIFICATIONS OF AIR CONDITIONING
67150
1.310.00
594
CALIFORNIA CASUALS
T- SMIWIS C 5WEATSHIRTS WITH L060 0
67251
308.71
6Z
CALIFORNIA JOURNAL
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL J. LAM
67252
34.48
3305
CARVE PACIFIC CORPORATION
CREDIT APPLY TO INVOICE C1604T 4
62253
354.31
68
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE
STREET SIGNS
67254
45.58
73
CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO. INC.
VEHICLE MAINTENAMCZ UNIT 4714 4
67255
97.91
74
CITY RENTALS
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
67256
90.00
2546
COAST ELECTRIC
LIGHTING SUPPLIES
67257
B.ZB
2692
COMPUSEAVEV INCORPORATED
ACCOUNT /1000293430
6TISS
142.36
3269
CPU" MASTER ASPHALT
ASPHALT C CONCRETE LOADS
61159
105.00
<<< 61360 -
61262 >>>
95
CUCAMONGA CC WATER GIST
107 CU FT 4
67263
7.663.26
3331
CUNERTY. ANNA
INSYRUCTOR PAYMENT IN FULL CL4S460
61264
161.80
239
0 C K CONCRETE CO
VINNAR W/O SAPPHIRE. R.C. A
67265
713.65
2512
D.A.R.E. AMERICA
SUPPLIES
67266
3.128.17
3364
OAGUE, ROBIN
ASSISTANT INSTR C.E.R.T. CL95 5119
67167
75.00
Z3l
DNISI YYEEL RIBBON CD, INC
SOUND COVER FOR TOSHIBA PRINTER
67260
253.57
347
DAY - TIMERS. INC.
CALENDAR SUPPLIES
672.9
T1.12
1087
DEPENDABLE AUTO SERVICE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 0316
67210
880.13
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 05 -27 -92 (91/92)
u..........
................... ...............
RUN DATE:
05123192 1611C: 2
VFNGOR
.uuuu....
NAME
.uu.........uu...... vu
n...................................................
'TEM DESCRIPTION
...vu.....................uu....uu.u.
................................
WARR NO
............................uuu
WARR. ANT.
..
•A CHECK# OVERLAP
107
OETCO
PLAQUE A
672IL
152.46
274
DIETZ TOYING
TOY UNIT .648
67272
290.00
523
EASTMAN, INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
67213
6.68
6530
EL OORACC BANS
PROGRESS PN\M£NT 04 A
67274
5.011.15
1258
ELLIS. JANA
REIRBURSEMENT FOR C.E.R.T. 0115
67275
20.44
2349
ESGIL LCRP.
CONTRACT SERVICE 411 - 4130
67176
3.493.36
2366
EVERSAFE
SAFETY GLASSES
67211
114.56
3089
FINAL FINISH AUTO RESTURATORS
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT A 101
67218
125.00
2030
FAA SERVICES. INC.
PARCEL TRACKING SOFTWARE PROGRAM A
67279
11.131.15
1082
FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES A
67180
471.08
4913
FROSCD COMPANY
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LTC. 0 11732
61281
6.43
1245
GONSALVES E SON, JOE A.
JUNE SERVICES
67182
2.100.00
650
GRAINIER, Y.Y.
DRUM DOLLY - 1200 LS 1
61283
248_69
4920
GRANT, DAVID N.
PART 192 -10T4 -MINUS 120.PROCSS FEE
67284
25.00
((< 67285 -
67285 »>
43T
GTE CALIFORNIA
948-9635 1
67286
3.110.69
3460
HEAVISIDE. JCMN
ASST.INSTR /C.E.R.T. MAY 14. 1992
67287
15.00
3.58
NEIM, P43
INSIRUEIDR PMT IN FULL CLASS 1 6304
67288
126.72
2256
MI -LINE ELECTRIC CCNPANY
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
67289
351.16
1461
HCBIRT CORPORATION
REPAIR DISHWASHER F RCMC
61190
95.01)
1255
MOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT #540
61291
80.B:_
4921
HUEY. OIVID
ADULT TENNIS REFUND - ICY 0 8531
672V2
30.011
3436
HUNT. LUANNE
REIMBURSEMENT - CASSETTE NOOK -UP
67293
8.00
1942
AT ORO TEA SYSTEMS. INC.
SAN BLAST MIX MO Zl LE
67294
220.46
495
HYDRO -SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES A
61295
389.03
46
INDUSTRIAL 45PHALT
R98ERDS - RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0
67296
310.35
2956
INDUSTRIAL BRUSH CORPORATION
VANGUARD BROOM NIT .090
67291
441.78
1952
INLAND EMPIRE STAGES, LTD.
S'1LVANG FOR THE OAY -STOPS IM S.B.
67298
600.00
3464
ISLAND EMPIRE TRINSPDRTAIIOW
TI!ANSPORT BODY TO CORONERS OFFICE
61299
115.00
4915
INSUL- ACOUSTICS INC.
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 22967
67300
231.94
4916
1. L M. SALES L MARKETING
D9ERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 1 23752
67301
6.00
612
JAESCHKE INC.. C.R.
E4UIPAENT MAINTENANCE 1
67302
917.08
4917
JOHNSON, ANDREW
REFUND CLASS 4 6043 - ACT A 95788
61303
12.00
342T
KELLY SERVICES. INC.
AEEK ENDING 5110192 t 5117192
67304
634.40
1059
KING BEARING. INC.
9cMICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT 4 641 4
67JD5
II4.76
115
KMART STCRES
HIIMTENANCE SUPPLIES A
61306
95.27
<<< 6730T -
6730T >>>
1218
KNOT
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES A
67308
1.150.27
321
LANDSCAPE REST
I7RIGATION REPAIR - LAO 2
67309
3.211.82
3449
LAW, DANA
ART IN YEE PARK /COREOY MAGIC SHOWS
67310
250.00
949
LAWSON PROCLCTS, INC.
CREDIT KEKO -LNV 1 OIT5466 1
61311
1•`48.91
4914
LEE DESIGNS
OVEMPAYKERT OF BUS. LIC. F 18181
67312
8.10
49:3
LONGS DRUG STORE CALIF..INC.0273
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. . 14814
67313
23.00
1062
M C I TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CUSTOMER A 7EI28736 4
67314
142.25
2952
MAILSORT, INC.
REEK ENDING 5117192
6015
17.49
4916
MANKIRE CONSTRUCITON, INC.
DEPOSIT REFUND - PERMIT 1 5176
67116
500.00
549
MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENI.INC.
OEL '91 MONTHLY BASE CHARGE
67317
1.182.73
R
MARK CHRIS, INC.
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT A 335
67318
30.67
4922
MATREYEK, MIKE
ADULT TENNIS REFUND - RCT A 9532
67319
30.00
3015
MC CALL. SUSAN
INSTRUCTOR PMT - CLASS 06089 IN FULL
IT32G
57.60
3057
MILLS. MIRY
INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL -CLASS 6001 -2
67)21
195.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF IRRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 05 -21 -92 (91/92)
RUN DATE: 05/28/92 PAGE: 3
..........00 ..................................................................................... ................................
VEMOOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO NARR. AMT.
...uu.......uuu. uu....................uuu...uu ou............... ........... ......................... u..........
4319
3333
1910
3316
1111
1240
2545
593
3137
3332
712
235
997
2019
1891
5745
1860
2503
311
541
5531
5139
255
W 65
3.4,
BD
6Z6
2311
216
3314
$11
132
3067
5741
1116
1327
3270
317
1432
750
675
2730
693
5142
5TN
3422
5144
66T
758
774
MONTESSORI ACADEMY
YOTT, STLVIA
MOVER PRODUCTS
MR. T-S 24 -MR. TONING
N B I INC.
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NATIONAL AROCR OAT FOUNDATION
NATIONAL 407ARY ASSOCIATION
NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE
NICKLES, ARLEEN
MORRIS- REPKE. INC.
OMEN ELECTRIC
P I P PRINTING
PACIFIC DESIGN CONCEPTS
PLRAMOUSE TIRE INC.
PAUL'S PLACE
PERRY COMPANY, MIKE
PETERSON. LILLE
PICCNE PLUMBING CORPORATION
PIP PRINTING
PUMOIUOR. MARK
POLOS%OV, AAREN
AGRA DISTRIELTING CO
PRUDENTIAL CVERALL SUPPLY
R L J PRINTING
RAINBOW PHDTC LAN
RAUL'S TIRE AND WHEELS
RcCLVERI P.T. INC.
RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
ROBINSON FERTILIZER
SAN BERN CC OFFICE OF .MACKAY SVC
SAN DIEGO RCTSRY BROOM CO. INC
SAUL, SANDY
SIWNIMS. DOUG
SCHA�FER DIXON ASSOCIATES
SMART L FI6AL
SO CALIF ECISON
SO CALIF EDISON CO.
SO CALIF ECISON- -ATTN: SHEILA LUNA
SPECIALTY TVPEWRITER SERVICE
T 8 0 INSTALLATION. 1NCl
TELECOMMUNICATIONS MONT. CORP.
U.S. /WHITE VAN BATTERY CO.. INC.
WALLIS, STUART
VAUGHANS LANCSCAPI NG
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
VINEYARD ACOUSTICS
VISA
WELDING INDUSTRIAL C TOOL SUPPL
NESTER CCNPUTER SERVICES, INC
A. CHECA4
OVERPAIMENT ON PR 1 92 -05
INSTRUCTOR PAT IN FULL -CLASS F 5040
MAINT £ #A NCE SUPPLIES 1
TON UNITS TO STATION A
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - 4/1 -JO/92 A
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE A
DUES FOR DENNIS STOUT
NNA SEMINAR /JUDY ACOSTA 7/22/92
UNIFORM SERVICES A
INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL CLASS A 6073
HAVEN AVE. /CHURCH TO BASE LINE 0
PVC GLUE QUARTS 1
O.A.R.E. GRADUATION CERTS
MODEL 200 -N ROTATING GRILL 0
LTZ15 /85816 lOPR nIC [PS RIB T A
OVER9ANMEN7 OF BUS LTC .25166
BUTTONS. WHITE MINOO.,RAR00N IMRRT
FILM PROC, SUPPL FOR SR. FIESTA
REPAIR WATER SERVICE .
CERTIFICATES
TRAV ACV NTL DARE CONFT 114- T118/92 A
REFUNC- CRAFTER'ART IN THE PARK'
CHEVR HTOR, GELD MULTIGRC. CERRON
MAT 16, MOP 4250, OUST CLOTH 1830 1
CAMP CUCAMONGA REGISTRATION FORMS
PHOTOGRAPHICS SUPPLIES
SERVICE CALL.01SMObNTEMOUNT 0620 1
REPAIR 2 -STAGE HYDRAULIC CYLINDERS A
REO I -MEA6U 0.E 2 -0734 t
16 -6 -8 TURF SUP_ ./TEAK A
TELEPRCCESSING SV(S M4RCH 1991 A
2 SETS MGC_L 100 GUTTER BROOMS
INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL CLASS 15410
CLASS REFUN0.40ULT TENNIS RCT68547
PRDJWAA025T -SVC Z/22- 3/27192 1
TRIO AMAROS SUPPLIES e
65 30 136 2099 01 000 4 0
16430- 4040.x -4056 STR LITE INSTALL
(« 67360 -
65 30 136 4741 01 DOB 2 A
PARTS L REPAIR FOR TYPEWRITER
A/C REPAIRS �'MLT 1316
CABLE CONSULTING FEES
14-2200 9614 0
CLASS REFUND 18565
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 120660
RECEIPT BOORS C RIBBONS
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 412677
4820 0058 8144 1009 A
H' -LII3M RENTAL A
POWER SUPPLY 9
OVERLAP
63322
61 32 3
67 324
67325
63326
63327
61326
67319
61330
67331
61332
61313
67334
67335
67336
67337
67330
67339
67340
6 841
67342
61343
67344
67345
67346
6T 341
67 348
67349
67350
67351
67352
67354
67355
67356
67357
67353
67359
61363 )»
67364
67365
61366
67367
67368
67369
67370
67371
67372
67373
67374
67315
10.00
162_00
2.436.74
150.00
1.196.00
3S5_42
10.00
98.00
373.35
90.00
15.273.35
131_44
IT9.94
162.06
1.021.50
8.00
346.21
31.91
391.04
1.11
298.00
15.00
1.038.43
63.56
.79.29
60_61
118 -00
992.65
1.1.13
.822_09
510.00
133.61
297.00
15.00
2.452.50
223.45
1.497.34
452.66
4.352.74
64.39
55.85
4.000.00
266.67
30.00
70.92
167.63
18.00
219.83
122.52
657.68
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERI00: 05 -27 -92 (91/91)
RUN DATE: 05/28/92 PAGE: 4
..............•...• a . a ........................ •..............•........... •.................... ................................
VENCOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT.
............. ..................................................•...•............................ ......................... .........
3410 WESTERN EQUIPMENT L SUPPLY CO
509 XER01 CORPORATION
371 LEE MEDICAL SERVICE
340 IFP MANOFAC16RING COMPANY
r
H CHECK. OVERLAP
BEAR I 67376 58.55
5090 DUPLICATOR 0687893107 1 6737? 3.033.34
MI5( 1ST AIU SUPPLIES I 673T0 205.00
MISC AUTO CLEANING SUPPLIES 67379 287.TB
.. TOTAL 204.162.27
CITY OF RANCHO CUFAMON&A
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERI00: 06 -03 -92 (91/92)
RUN DATE:
06/03/92 PIGS: I
.
.....................................................•....................................•........
v•v.••...•..
VENDOR
•.... u•...... • •........... •.....
NAME
.......• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a...•.......................
ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO
. a........v.....
PARR. AMT.
........•.......................
40 CHECK'
OVERLAP
3432
THORNTON, CHERYL
CPR INSTRUCTOR PMT - PLAYGROUND PERSN
673800
176.40
<<< 51381 -
6T36) >>>
ZT31
UNIGLOBE REGE''Cl TRAVEL
AIRLNE RESERV -MUNl CL KS INST 1119
613844
242.00
350
U.S. POSTMASTER
POSTG LANDSCAPEESTR LGHT OSTR NENSE
61385♦
1.300_00
<<< 67386 -
67387 )»
1
A C A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.. INC.
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4
67308
1.904. IB
5810
A L R OISTRIBUTORS
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 023757
67389
56.00
30
6 L R TIRE SERVICE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
67390
2.010.46
2687
ACUNA JR, OSCAR
ADULT 6.8. SCOREKEEPER PPE 5131192
67391
31.63
1417
ALBIN. APT
PLKTSCHCCL SUB 12 MRS. PPE 5131192
61392
5..D0
3448
ALL WELDING
REPAIR WROUGHT IRON FENCE 4
67393
429.99
6600
ALTA LOMA VIDEO
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 019566
67394
23.00
2411
ARAGON, SALLY
INSTRUCTOR PAYMEMI IN FULL SPRING
67395
710.94
370
ARROW TRUCK BODIES L EQUIP INC
TIE DOWNS
67396
200.42
402
ALTO 4ESTORATORS
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
67397
219.11
1d08
BACA. CATHERINE
PLAYSCNOOL INSTRUCTOR AID 4 MRS.
61398
44.08
6811
BARNARDS FIRE SPRINKLER INC.
DUPLICATE LICENSE 019735
67399
90.65
3227
BAYLESS STATICNKRS
OFFICE SUPPLIES P
67400
1.145.19
47
BELL C HOWELL
SERVICE AGREEMENT RENEWAL 9
674D1
3.156.00
555
BENEFIELD, KINGSLEY
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT IN FUEL SPRING
67402
118.80
3455
BERRY, MELISSA
ADULT SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER 9 MRS.
61403
60.15
2517
BERRY. WAN CA
PLAYSCMODL INSTRUE702 AID 16 MRS.
67404
83.60
1338
BIG A AUTO PARTS
VE M IDLE MAIN YEN NCE UNIT '710
61405
2.25
6812
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 91Z637
67406
108.36
2209
&LAIR. INGRID
CASH ACVANCE ESRI EKCUTIVE SEMINAR
6T407
150.00
142
BRADFORD. HAROLD
INSTRUCTDR PAYMENT IN FULL SPRING
61408
23.76
1166
BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES
14STRUCTDR PAYMENT IN FULL SPRING
61409
341.55
552
SURK- BLACKSCFLEGER. ROSEANN
14STROCTOR PAYMENT IN FULL SPRING
61410
2.258.44
6817
BURNS. PATH
REFUND CLASS 95180 ROT P96916
67411
1.50
6918
BURNS. ROBERT
REFUND CLASS '5100 ACT 096915
67412
1.50
1001
SURTRONICS
2 CARTONS PAPER
67413
279.85
6813
BUSINESS RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS
EI'PL RELATIONS IN ACTION - RENEWAL
6704
169.00
931
CALCOMP INC.
MLIMTEWANCE 6/1/92 - 6/30/92
67415
202.00
6815
CALIFORNIA POOLS L SPAS
REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT 95355/5356
67416
250.00
2486
CANCIND, KATHY
PLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR AID 25 MRS.
67417
200.00
6820
CAPPELLI, TONY
REFUND CLASS 85180 RCT 495907
67418
1.50
3305
CARDE PACIFIC CORPORATION
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 4643 F
67419
2.6.21
481
CARE AMERICA HEALTH PLAN
JUTE PREMIUM GROUP 010637
67420
24.1T4.12
6039
CARL'S LIQUOR MARKET
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 922495
67421
6.80
6821
CARMEN. JOE
REFUND CLASS 05180 ROT 998366
67422
1.50
60.2
CASTELLANOS. NORMA
REFUND CLASS 15180 ROT 997923
67423
1.50
68::3
CASTELLANOS. PAUL
REFUND CLASS 45190 RCT 097922
67424
1.50
68
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE
TENNIS COURT LIGHTS INSTRUCTIONS 0
67425
994.10
713
CHICKS SPORTING GOODS INC
STOPWATCHES 0
6TKZ6
78.76
73
CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO. INC.
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 9713 0
67427
147.56
2544
COAST ELECTRIC
LIGHTING SUPPLIES
6T.23
40.28
1&12
COMPLETE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
DEVELOPER 6 DRUM BLADE
61.29
215.39
1094
COOKIARTHUR INC.. BUSINESS PR00.
REPAIR PAPER SHREDDER
67430
190.02
3026
COROURA. ALOG
A. BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER 9 MRS.
61431
51.75
6916
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES
REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT MONUMENT PM12513
61432
2.500.00
6819
CRAIG CANEPA
REFUND CLASS 051dO ICY R9TZ65
67433
1.50
LITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PtR[00: 06 -03-92 (91/92)
RUN OAYt: 06/03/92 V >S_: 2
..................• u•..........•..... i. a ..................•........... a• ............... ............................�...
1E40DR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT.
...............uu..ou............. . ............ uu....... .. .......uu........uu...... uv...... u...... a v...
it CMECMR
OVERLAP
3269
CRUSH MASTER ASPHALT
CONCRETE LOAD C OVERSIZED LCAO
62434
85.00
85
CUCAMONGA CO uATER 01ST
11 CU FT 0
67435
1.407.03
6821
CURD, NORMAN
REFUND CLASS M5I80 RCT 198437
67.36
1.50
239
D t M CONCRETE CD
GARDEN W/O HELLMAN, R.L. P
61432
520_91
2512
O.A.R.E. AMERICA
WHITE CAPS /WRISTBAMOS /MEND PADS
61138
267.54
2+95
DIPPER TIRE CO.. INC.
TIRES
6T439
1.422.62
265D
OELGLDO, JOSHUA
A. OPSKETBALL SCOREKEEPER 20.5 HIS
611.0
117.88
1762
DENSON. JAMES
MILEAGE REIMS RESTRM LOCKUP 5131
674.1
101.92
I087
DEPENDABLE AUTO SERVICE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE .
67442
1..48.26
3478
OILINE CORPORATION
MAINTENANCE
67443
36.73
6825
GREYER, ELLEN
REFUND CLASS 4518D PCT .96814
67414
4.50
683*
DREIER, HOWARD
REFUND CLASS 15180 RCT 096815
67445
4.50
546
DVORAK, GATLE
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT IN FULL SPRING
61.46
723.69
523
EASTMAN, INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
67441
4.02
3258
£LLIS. JAN!
CASH ACV. REFRESHMENTS CERT CLASSES
67448
200.00
511
EMBASSY SUITES
RESERVATIONS VIVAN GARCIA 618 -6112
67449
327.00
1177
EMPIRE ECONOMICS
MARKET ABSORPTION STUDY CFD 091 -1
67450
6.000.00
2034
ESPOSITO, CHRISTINA
PLAYSChOOI INSTRUCTOR AID 10 MRS.
67451
110.20
12.
FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND, INC.
HINGES, CA'., TENSION BANDS
61452
72.19
155
FILARSKI t MATT
CONTRACT SERVICES
67453
1.20250
33TT
FIVE. KATHERINE C.
PLAYSCHOOL AIDE - PRE 5/31192
67454
18.00
1844
FONTANA MOTORCYCLES INC.
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0
61455
864.1.
2840
F0RD OF UPLAND. AMC.
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0
61456
969.15
98
FORD va[NTING t MAILING. INC
31 PAGE GRAPEVINE-SUMMER 1992
67457
626.25
3178
FOWLER, MARK
INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL FOR SPRING
67458
160.00
l L44
FRAME-ANT
11 K 14 FRAMES
61459
303.71
1082
FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
CALCULATOR PAGEFINDER
67460
38.63
1444
GARCIA. ANY
SCOREKEEPER - PPE 5/31/92
67461
54.00
3356
GARCIA. VIVIAN
CASH ACVANCE /DISASTER PLNG- 6/6 -12
67462
90.00
1994
GILKEY. VIRGINIA
PL- TSCNODL AIDE - PPE 5/31192
67463
19.80
491
GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT . 501 0
61464
31.35
3434
GREEN, MICHAEL
INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL /0 S3DO -5307
67465
234.00
1900
GRIFFITH RADIATOR SALES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT A 644
67466
72.50
137
GTE CALIFORNIA
941 -8087 .
6T46T
1.799.63
3021
HARRISON, MICHAEL E.
ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 5/31/92
6 %468
50.00
098
HART. JIM
CASH ACVANCE /ESRI EKECVTIVf SEMINAR
61469
150.00
3441
HEAVVSIDE, PETE
ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 5131/92
67.70
50.00
1333
MERCHEMROEDER. LISA
BLDG COVERAGE REC.ASST -PPE 5131/92
67471
55.00
3020
HESSE, JOE
ADULT V.B. OFFICIAL - PRE 5/31/92
67472
60.00
3408
HINSON. KEITH
BLDG COVERAGE REC.ASST. /PPE S/31192
67473
312.13
933
HOLMES, SHEILA
PLAYSCEOOL INSTRUCTOR - PRE S/31/92
67474
240.00
1234
HOSENAN
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
62,75
114.81
2412
UTT. RAYMOND
INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL FOR SPRING
61416
2.911.10
3475
HULL t ISSCCIATES. INC.. BRUCE W.
COMMUNITY FAC GIST A 91 -1
67477
6.300.00
4940
HWANG. JUNG
T M 14207 L CLIP 09- -13
67478
11000.00
495
HTDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 4
67119
204.73
897
Z.C.B.D.
92 CA PLUMB CODE 2 PART.TITLE 24 PT
67480
31.09
705
IGE. ALBERT
INSTRUCTOR PMT /CLASS 8 9290 - 5291
62481
30.52
46
INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
BERYL STREET - RANCHO CUCAMONGA A
67482
170.83
165
INGRIM PAPER
PAPER SUPPLIES .
61483
316.35
3359
J.S.I. WEST
SCRATCHERS -AUTO VAC- VEEK`NO GETAWAY
67484
226.24
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 06 -03 -92 (91/92)
RUN
DATE: 06103/92 PAGE: 1
........•..
.ENUOR
...ue...................uu......................uuu...0
u• v .................................................................................
NAME
ITEM DESCRIPTION RARR NO
vu.....uw...vuu......uu................
...................•............
RARR. AMT.
uu.......u......
•t CMECKF
OVERLAP
612
JAESCHKE INC.. C.R.
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT 8 533 A
57485
BBI.61
3379
JOHNSON, KELLY
FIELD SUPERVISOR - PPE 5/31/92
57486
36.00
179
KAISER PERMAMENTE
GROUP A 1932 -00 A
57487
24,403.81
3427
KELL, SERVICES. INC.
WEEK ENDING S/24/92 -HELEN CANZONERI
ii 74B9
317.2C
3396
KELSEY, ROGER
SOCCER OFFICIAL - PRE 5/31/92
67489
125.00
2771
KITCHEN. JAY
SOCCER OFFICIAL - PPE 5/31192
67490
50.00
2399
KLUSMAN, CAROL
PLAYSCMOOL AIDE - PPE 5131192
01491
62.16
1226
K.U.
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES R
67492
226.66
1024
KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY
SS -1H EMUL
61493
167.12
172
KOZLOVICM. DEBBIE
INSTRUCTOR PMT CLASS A 5160 - 5181
67494
1.628.55
518
KUHN. MARY
COCO CERT -EMERG CAR FITS /MAY '92
67,95
154.63
2040
LAIR. 54BRCM
INSTRUCTOR PHI -CLASS 4 5190 - 5191
67496
265.65
193
LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO
TRASH REMOVAL
6749'1
15.558.96
2773
LIVESAY, CHUCK
B.S.-V.S. GYM SUPERV /PPE 5131/92
67498
175.00
282
LOGUE, SALLY
PLAYSCMDOL SMSTRUC TOR /PPE 5131/92
67499
156.00
3476
LOIKO. STEPHEN
PARK RESERVATIONS - PPE 5/31/92
67500
68.75
3D23
LUNT. BREMT A.
5.8. OFFICIAL - PPE 5/31192
67501
180.00
2830
LYNCH, BROCK
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL -PPE 5/31/92
67502
90.00
600
LYNCH. JANIE
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
67503
34.44
956
MAC DONALD. IAIN
INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL FOR SPRING
67504
526.02
3169
MAOOEAM, DARLENE N.
PLAYSCHOOL AIDE - PPE 5/31/92
67505
36.00
2952
MAILSORTI INC.
WEEK ENDING 5/23/92
67506
67.13
3332
MARVEL. KELLY
INSTRUCTOR PHI IN FULL FOR SPRING
67507
516.00
2727
MARK. MICHAEL
INSTRUCTOR PMT - CLASS 4 5311-5333
67506
781.85
2537
MC ALLISTER. RICHARD
INSTRUCTOR PMT - CLASS 4 6180-6191
67509
532.13
2199
MC 'ROLE, TRACI
FIELD SUPERVISOR - PPE 5/31192
6751D
36.00
1125
MC GAREC MACHINE
WEL04ENT FOR VENT 4
67511
878.17
889
MEYER. JASON
INSTRUCTOR PMT - CLASS 66305
67512
IYO.OB
2225
MEYER. LEINHA
INSTRUCTOR PAT IM FULL-CLASS 45135
67513
157.91
4924
MIDWEST FASTENER CORP.
UVERPATKENT OF BUS. LIC. 4 22084
67514
257.00
749
MIJAC ALARP :ARRANT
MAY MONTHLY FIRE-JUNE MONTHLY FIRE
67515
1,042.00
1143
MULLGRAV, CHEARICE
CASH ACVANCE-ESRI USER CONFERENCE
67516
IOD.00
2440
NEWBORN. LISA
PMT - BALLROOM DANCE MAY 9. 1992
67517
65.00
433
NIKON -EGLI ECUZPMEMT
FAN MOTOR 4
61518
365.27
3467
NO ART
CITY SEAL GRAPES
61S19
696.90
1211
O'NEAL. DIANE
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
61520
i.OBD.00
527
OLYMPIC STLOIOS. INC.
INSTRUCTOR PMT - CLASS 45001 -5151
61521
2.098.80
232
OMMITRAMS
MAY 92 8US PASSES
67522
400.50
2640
ON -CALL COMMUNICATIONS
18011 -I
67523
45.00
67
ON -CALL PAGING
18011 -2 A
67524
615.00
2686
OSBORN, BETH
SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER -PPE 5/3119[
67525
54.00
235
OMEN ELECTRIC
S.C. PULL BOX .
67526
19.95
1826
PACTEL CELLULAR
A/C /1218001/714- 293 -2DIO A
675ZT
406_21
1891
PARKHOUSE TIRE INC.
-L000RI0 H FST UT 2080 RAO T8 ST OW
67528
1.037.80
5746
PATTEM6£LL, GLADY5
CLASS REFUND 151dO. ACT 497213
67523
1.50
3185
PEARSON, ROBIN
INSTRUCTOR- SPRING 16280- 6295 -PP6 /3
67530
252.78
3404
PELTIER. KEVIN
OFFSITE CLASSES,REC ASST -PPE 5/31
67531
93.50
2805
PENOERGRAPX. RONALD
ADULT EB OFFICIAL PPE S/31/92
67532
90.00
6013
PETERSON, BRIAN
SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER PPE S 131
67533
52.50
5747
PHOENIX FOCOSERVICES
F4E -V. 6ARCIA -DIS PLNG CRS -6/6 -6/12
67534
56.00
2T2
PITNEY BONES
A /(07430- 3340 -2D -9
67535
240.82
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 06 -03 -92 (91/92)
RUN DATE:
06103192 i0 [,E; 5
a..
v..•
VENDOR
..........•.
................... .........................................
NINE
u.....• .... ......................a........
. • ...........................
ITEM DE5C9IP'ION
a v........ .......uo......a.....•.........v.
MARR NO
a...................a
VANN. AMT.
u.............. as...........
44 CHECMI OVCRLIP
791
PMI /OELIA CARE
JUNE PREMIUM GROUP 11136
62536
919.73
255
PONA DISTRIBUTING CO
GASOLINE FLAMMABLE LIQUID UN -1203
6753?
91BS5.89
2719
POMCBAUO, JAMICE
INSTRUCTOR PMT -IN FULL - SPRING
6TS38
L9I.91
926
PRIME COMPUIEY, INC.
MAINT 4150, 32 MB ECC, TAPE SUBSYS t
67599
3.009.02
1491
PRINT SOURCE. THE
BUS CARDS -PEG CUSTOMER STI.PMS253 A
6TSI0
46.ZO
65
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
MOP 3038, MAT 46. OUST CLOTH 1930 1
67541
57.95
3454
QUALITY EMIERPRISES
37- 155 -10 ANSELL EOMONT GLOVES
675A2
45.73
5748
R L B RAINBOW
REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT 15322
67543
250.00
STAR
RAMIREZ, MARY
CLASS REFUND 15180. ACT 19799Z
67544
1.50
2842
RAMO$. NICOLE
LIONS CENTER. REC ASST
6764S
18.79
2257
AAUL'S IUTO 1RIK, INC.
RECOVER HEADLINER
6T546
66.94
720
REAGAN, VERA
INSTRUCTOR PMT - SPRING -06270
6TS41
229.09
2832
REYES. ANNE
ADULT SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER
67548
141.00
3A3Z
RIDO. LINDA
INSTRUCTOR PMT - SPRING -16OT4
67549
40.00
276
RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
AM- MVLAR- SLICK, SETUP 0
67550
99.13
250",
ROBERTSMAM, ENVIRON. CONTROL DIV.
MAY 1492 QUARTERLY BILLING -LYON 4
6T551
6.796_15
3335
ROSE, CHRISTIE
INSTRUCTOR PMT - SPRING -15430
67552
61.50
521
ROUGEAU. PAUL
INCH WIG. RIV -SBO TRAFFIC EMG ASSOC
67553
61.00
132
SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO. INC
3 SETS MODEL 700 GUTTER BROOMS
67554
200..2
3041
SANCHEZ, ALEX
CONTRACT STAFF. KID WRESTLING PRGM
67555
262.75
57SO
SANCHEZ, EC
CLASS REFUND 05190, RCT 198468
67556
1.50
5751
S MONEY. JEAN
CLASS REFUND 5180, RCT 498469
67557
1.50
5752
SAN'HEL, LEGNA
RE148 PMT- MEOILS FOR KID WRESTLING
61558
68.N0
5T53
SAPHFAAHIJCM, PMISIT
CLASS REFUND 45180, RCT 198418
57559
1.50
5754
SAPHYAKNAJON, 509CKITI
CLASS REFUND 85180. RCT 199419
67560
1.50
5755
SARVER, JAM
CLASS REFUND 15180, RCT 096594
67561
1.50
5756
SARVER, FIFE
CLASS REFUND 05190, RCT 096583
61562
L.50
3037
SCIORTINO. NICOLAS G.
ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL PPE 5131
67563
250.00
5757
SCOTT, CHARLOTTE
CLASS REFUND 05180, RCT 191570
67564
1.50
5758
SEDILLO. DUN
CLASS REFUND $5180. RCT 496987
67565
1.50
5159
SEDILLO. MICKIE
CLASS REFUND 15180. RCT $96988
67566
1.50
535
SEMPLE, JULY
INSTRUCTOR PMT - SPRING -CL 16220 1
61567
286.09
5760
SHRAGG. DAVID
CLASS REFUND 15180, ACT 09723♦
67568
1.50
SITS
SHRAGG, KATHY
CLASS REFUND 05180. RCT 89TZ33
61569
1.50
$761
SIERRA FORMS ANO SYSTEMS
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 123530
61570
25.DD
3.1
SIGN SHOP. )YE
24126 CORDPL4ST
61571
91.59
1831
5.40. WEST COAST INC.
REPAIRS ON UNIT 051T 1
67 5T
537.7;
692
SIR SPEEDY
TITLE 8 STAMP
6T 5T3
14.01
5161
SISTLER. LOWELL
CLASS REFUND 45180, RCT 497976
67574
1.50
3479
SMITH. LAVID
CASH ACVANCE -ESRI USER CONFERENCE
61575
100.00
5763
SMITH. .13tI
CLASS REFUND IS1BU, RCT 497333
67576
1.50
5764
SMITH. SHANE
CLISS REFUND 4518U• RCT t9T381
67577
1.50
1431
50 CALIF EGISON- -ATTN: SHEILA LUNA
65 30 136 5251 02 000 0 1
67570
24.482.09
319
50 CALIF GAS CO.
16 3107 835 2001 3
67519
1.123.11
5165
SPENCER. ?AIRICIA
CLASS REFUND 4518D. RCT 897442
67580
1.50
5766
SPENCER: RICMARO
CLASS REFUND 45180. RCT 111441
67531
1.50
5167
SPJUT. Ell.
CLASS REFUND 85180. RCS 096579
67582
3.00
5768
SPJUT, KAREN
CLASS REFUNC 45180. RCT 476580
67583
3.00
3480
SPRADIIM, MARY ANN
ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL PPE 5/31
6T59A
75.00
646
STANOARC INSURANCE CO.
JUNE PREMIUM POLICY 1497390 -01
6T585
662.16
5281
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TUITION -V. GIRCIA -CIS PLNG CRSE6 /3
61586
175.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FIR PERIOD: 06 -03-92 (91192)
.....................
uu............. uo ....
RUN DATE:
06/03/91 PGGE: 5
VENDOR
.uu.uuuu..........
NAME
uu.. ou.uv....uvu.uu.....
.... .... .... ................................... ......
ITEM DESCRIPTION VARR NO
......uu.......uu.........uu............
.. .... .... ............. ..... ...
NARK. ANT.
uv.... u...... uvu...
.. CHIC"
OVERLAP
2180
STEPHENS, HOUSTON
ADULT ad OFFICIAL PPE 5/31
67587
90.00
378
SULLIVAN. P
PLAN CHECK 92- 1539.1739.23.1969
67548
1.680.00
3034
SUNDERLAND. TIMOTHY A.
ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL PPE 5/31
67589
175.00
675
T C B INSTALLATION, INC.
REPAIR A/C UNIT 0712
67590
208.82
836
TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS
SOLO JETPAK SPRAYER
6T991
261.81
1151
TECF.b IC
MAINT PRINTER 81000 1
67592
245.00
2118
TERRY. DONNA
INSTRUCTOR PMT - SPRING- CLASS15140644
67593
194.37
3181
THROCKMORTON, MARCELA
INSTRUCTOR PMT - SPRING CLI6C43
61594
64.80
471
TRIGG
REPLACE STINGRAY MOO 1
67595
201.42
3409
TRIMBLE, LAIRINA
RCNC BUILDING COY REC. ASST.
67596
264.00
5769
TRULY YOURS
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 110594
67597
6.00
5770
TUULY, AATHY
CLASS REFUND 15190. RCT 198093
67598
1.50
1443
TURNER, ESTHER
CASH ADVANCE CPRS OAT CAMP YORKSHP
67599
110.00
693
U.S. /WHITE VAN BATTERY CO.. INC.
24 -7200 BATTERY
6760D
45.OD
5084
UNIVERSITT OF COLORADO
COLORADO MUNICIPAL CLKS INST T /19
67601
520.00
3283
UVA, STEVE
AJULT SOCCER FIELD SUPR7 PPE5 /31
67602
36.00
2250
VALLEY OETRCIT DIESEL ALLISON
REPAIR ENGINE UNIT 4648
67603
0.310.62
3556
VAN VALKENBURGH, SUSAN
PLAYSCHOOL INSTRUCTOR /AID 1
61604
44.91
ST71
VILLAGE NURSERIES
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 115430
61605
23.60
3a at
VILLEGAS. MA&JEL
ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL PPE 5131
67606
2!1.00
478
WARREN L CO.. CARL
FILE IRCU91
61607
741.60
5171
WATAMA&E NURSERY, M.A.
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 86276
67608
45.48
213
WAIIEE. KLEEN -LINE CORP
MIS[ MAINT SUPPLIES
67609
311.OD
758
Wt LDLNG INDUSTRIAL G IDOL SUPPL
HELIUM RENTAL. BALLOON REGULATOR 4
67610
235.4T
3410
WESTERN EQUIPMENT I SUPPLY CO.
KEYS. BEARING. SHAFT 0659
67611
821.51
5773
WILCOK. ANY
CLASS REFUND 15180, RCT 091990
61612
1.50
5774
WILLIS. BILL
CLASS REFUND 15180. RCT 9972LZ
6T613
1.50
012
WITTER, JOANNE
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT- SPRING06020 -6065
67614
390.72
509
XEROX CORPORATION
SUPPLIES 6/[1698694172 1
676L5
2.695.65
1098
ZAGORIM, KEITH
ADULT TENNIS COURT SUPVR PPE 5/31
67616
38.50
3310
LAVAL A. RAVE
ADULT BB OFFICIAL PPE 5/31
676{7
45_00
A. TOTAL 206.613_86
C:' :I OF RANCHO CUCANO OR
LIST OF WARRANTS
FUR PERIOD: 06 -10 -92 (91192)
RUN DATE: 06110192 PAGE: 1
..................... ................. ................ u.... • • u.............. a ................................. •................
VE.DOi NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. LMT.
......... u•u.•... a u•.. v.... •..... .......• u•..•.... vou......... ...................u•.........• v............. u•......
A. CHECEI
61 BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND LEASE PAYMENT PER SEC. 4.4 TR79897
4Q8 ADAMS. ZE061E
1826 PACTEL <ELLULAR
3286 PRINCIPAL MLTUAL
898 HART. JIM
2731 UNIGLOBE REGENCY TRAVEL
962 A T L T
7 AOLFTRONICS
654 ACE LOCK C KIT
6877 AGO INTERNATIONAL
6879 ADVANCED DATA PRODUCTS INC.
1562 RINGO WELDING SUPPLY
6871 ALARM I VICEO SECURITY INC.
1135 ALIGNMENT C BR.KE SPECIALISTS
Z64 ALPHABET•
17 ALT• FIRE EQUIPMENT CO.
O 1430 MAERICIM 6USIVES$ FORMS
2929 AIERICAM CAMPING ASSOCIATION
6801 APPROVED FIRE PROTECTION
1061 J.AROS BY CHAMPION
6872 6 L B HONE DECOR
6426 HIKER, CAROL
6827 BAKER, TIN
6818 HALL. ROBOT
6829 1144RETT. .ARGY
6030 BARRETT. TEN
6831 BARTON, 1AYNE
2636 HAUER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
3227 HATLESS 51ATIONERS
6032 DEGEL. SLSAN
3243 LELKO. SE.RON
133d 1(G A AUTO PARTS
6833 IISHOP. KAREN
6834 IISHOP, LEO
2936 ILACKMAYA ENGINEERING
1247 !LIKE PAPEP CO.. INC.
6835 FLAKE. LCI:.
6876 PIPPIN, AMY
3330 RURAL RELOLRCES, INC.
6271 IOTTOM LINE
6836 IRANNEN. NANCY
6878 IRETON CONSTRUCTION INC.
6832 FROWN. BARBARA
6038 BROWN. "AMP
2559 C A L B 0
594 CALIFORNIA CASUALS
499 (ALIFORNI: VISION SERVICE PLAN
3305 CANOE PACIFIC CORPORATION
(<( 62222 -
EMP /CDPHUTER OF THE MONTH SUPPLIES
( <( 67384 -
A/C 1340131 0
JUNE PREMIUM GROUP ON19477
CASH ADVANCE CHIA JUNE 10 -12
AIRFARE- SALRA -J. HART.CMIL 6/10 -12
67624
714 -321- 2920 -0
ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES
KEYS L BRASS TAGS
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 619430
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 68828
MELDING L CUTTING OUTFIT
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 617094
VEHICLE MAINTFNANCE UNIT 1616
)RAC AWARD SUPPLIES
SERVICE PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER
POLICE RESPONSE DOOR HANGER
RIO FUN ACTIVITY
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 618644
TRONPIES 1ST 1 2ND PLACE TEAMS
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 621849
REFUND CLASS 15171 RCT 497592
REFUND CLASS 45171 RCT 197591
REFUND CLASS 65171 RCT 698037
REFUND CLASS 15181 ACT 198284
REFUND CLASS 05181 RCT $98283
REFUND CLASS 05171 RCT 696054
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 411-4/30192
OFFICE SUPPLIES I
REFUND CLASS 15181 NOT 098282
BROWN BIG CONCERT 6F14K92
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 614
REFUND CLASS 05171 ACT 99T665
REFUND CLASS I51T1 RCT 092666
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
SR MINI EVENTS SUPPLIES
REFUND CLASS 65181 RCT 896661
PARTIAL REFUND ST. DANCE RCTF9669Z
3/8• FINE
SUBSCRIPTION - JACK LAN
REFUND CLASS 05171 RCT 097594
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 619628
REFUND CLASS 05162 RCT 095926
REFUND CLASS $5162 RCT 195925
TECHNICAL TRAINING
SOFTBALL T- SHIRTS 0
JUNE PREMIUM GROUP 001031391 -R
SWEEPER PARTS
OVERLAP
67221.
6T38Z »>
6730J0
67619 >>>
67620.
67621.
676224
67623•
67625 »>
61626
67622
61628
67629
67630
67631
67632
67633
61634
62635
67636
67637
67630
6T639
6T640
67641
6T642
67643
6)644
67645
67646
67641
67648
67669
67650
6T651
67652
67653
67654
6)655
6T6S6
67657
67650
67659
67660
61661
6766Z
67663
67664
61665
67666
6T66T
70.932.41
50.00
200.41
59.$43.20
400.00
128.00
1.15
30 -54
17.35
18.SD
50.63
316.05
T.20
321.40
11 T.52
T8.00
638.42
6.95
9.45
1.086.12
25.10
1.50
1.56
1.50
1.50
450
850
1.250.00
413.82
1.50
100.00
6.53
1.50
1.50
2.953.T7
104.48
1.50
7.50
50.23
39.00
1.50
40.14
1.50
1.50
25.00
3.292.30
6.181.00
201.69
LI1IY OF RANCHO CUCAMIONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 06 -10 -92 (91/92)
RUN DATE:
06/t0/92 PIGF.: 2
..............
VENCOR
... a u..................
.......................•..............................................••....•....•..
MANE
u..... u.. a v.........
ITEM DESCRIPTION
a v...... u...........
.........................u.....
NARR NO
u...... u.........................
NARR. AMT.
a ........ u..... u....
iF CHECK#
OVERLAP
6939
CAVANAUGH, CRAIG
REFUND CLASS 45181
RCT 498000
67668
1.50
68
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE
STREET SIGNS
67669
1.409.81
69
CHAFFEY JOINT UNION NIGH SCHOOL
GYM RENT -YOUTH BASKETBALL
813 -T
61610
52 -50
6413
CHAFFEY PIMA
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS.
LIC. #18D78
67671
67.54
6840
CHAILU CHAIYAVET
REFUND CLASS 15162
ACT 997956 4
67672
3.00
6941
CHAIIAVET. SOMCHART
REFUND CLASS 05162
ACT #97955 4
67673
3.00
6842
CIELUCH. KIMBERLY
REE.iNO CLASS 95171
RCT 491587
67614
4.50
74
CITY RENTALS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
67675
60.00
6843
CLELAND, CANT
REFUND CLASS #5181
ACT 997401
67676
I.SO
6844
CLELAMO. TIM
REFUND CLASS 95181
ACT 997400
6747T
L.SO
2546
COAST ELECTRIC
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
67678
250.19
2646
COBB GROUP INC.. THE
INSIDE MICROSOFT WINDOWS
67679
42.02
6845
CGLBIT9. CHERYL
REFUND CLASS #5171
RCT 497010
61680
1.50
6846
COLE. DORIS
REFUND CLASS 65181
RCT 996768
67681
1.50
6847
COLE. MARLEY
REFUND CUSS 05181
ACT 996161
67682
1.50
6800
COLLEGE CLEANERS
OVERPA14ENT OF BUS.
LIC. 914893
67683
27.06
6874
CONTINENTAL MANAGEMENT
OVERPAINENT OF BUS.
LIC. 816199
67684
9.61
6B4B
COOPER, MARTHA
REFUND CLASS 05181
RLT 996926
67685
4.50
6849
COOPER. ROBERT
REFUND CUSS 95191
RCT 496925
67686
4.50
6TID
COSCO FIRE PROTECTION
OVER PAYMENT PERMITS
92- 2759/2763
67681
20.61
-- 6450
CkAIGHEAD. DAN
REFUND CLASS 95162
RCT 995881
61688
1.SD
6851
CRAIGHEAD♦ MARSHA
REFUND CLASS 6162
RCT 495982
67689
1.50
<<< 67690 -
67690 >>>
55
CUCIMOEIGA CO WATER DIST
is CU FT
A
67691
4.476.66
6882
CUITLAMUAC TER-VEEN CARPET CARE
OVERPA•MENT OF BUS.
LIC. 923B2D
67692
48.60
239
D C K CONCRETE CO
WINDROWS PARK. R.C.
67693
298.41
6852
DAILY, COMMA
REFUND CLASS 45311
ACT 497449
61694
1.50
2B4
DAIST WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC
DIGITAL CASSETTE
67695
40.25
2405
DAPPER TIRE CO.. INC.
TIRES FOR UNIT
67696
362.04
1191
DATAVAULT
DATA STORAGE
67697
141.00
6853
DAVIS. CERIE
REFUND CUSS 45171
ACT 997777
67698
1.50
347
OAT- TIMERS. INC.
JR DESK I PG /O STANDARD FILLER SET
61699
I9.tl
6856
DEL VECCHIO. ROSARIO
REFUND CLASS 05181
RCT #98372
67100
1.50
685T
DEL VECCHIO. WALTER
PARTIAL REFUND RCT
#98371 C 98312
67701
7.50
6854
DELGADO. HEIST
REFUND CLASS 45171
RCT 996640
61102
1.50
6855
DELGADO, RICO
REFUND CLASS 05171
RCT 096641
67703
1.50
60
DELTA OEMTIL PLAN OF CALIF
JUNE PREMIUM GROUP
44888
6T104
1T.064.90
6856
CENIS. ARMAND
REFUND CLASS 95162
RCT 990161
677D5
1.50
6859
DENI2. ANNIE
REFUND CLASS 05181
RCT 099466
67796
1.50
6860
DENI2. 003
REFUND CLASS 6181
RCT 098465
61701
1.50
1087
DEPENDABLE A410 SERVICE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
4
6TTOP
695.15
6915
DERMATOLOGY OFFICES IS9RAT HUSAIN
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS.
L:0. 019756
67709
43.00
109
DICTAPHONE CORP
REPAIR DICTAPHONE
9
61110
461.59
3165
DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS
ANNUAL INSPECTION SIN t1B6152910D1 4
67711
300.00
6061
DORGAN. BILL
REFUND CLASS 85171
RCT 096619
67112
1.50
6862
DORGAN• DEMISE
REFUND CLASS 05171
ACT 696690
61113
1.50
3493
ORAGNA. SHARON
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
IN FULL SPRING
67714
73.50
6663
D /NN. DON
REFUND CLASS 45171
RCT 097594
67115
1.50
6864
DYNN, SANDY
REFUND CLASS 85171
ACT 097593
67716
1.50
6865
EASTDM, STEVE
REFUND CLASS 45111
ACT 096053
67717
1.50
858
ECONGLITE COMTRCL PRODUCTS. I11C.
OVERPAYMENT OF BID
PACKET Ila
67718
1D.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 06 -10 -92 (91/92)
RUN DATE:
06/10/92 PAGE: 3
.............................................
VEYCOR
.uu..vuu......u•
NAME
• .....................uu..uvo....uw•
...................................
ITEM DESCRIPTION
u.uuu.•.
s u.... .............-
MARR NO
.uuuuuu.......uu..uu.••uuu.uu.v•
.................... •....... •
NARR. AMT.
41 CMECRR
OVENLAP
6866
EMILIO. ED
REFUND CLASS 15171 NOT 097905
67319
1_50
6867
EMILIO. JERRI
REFUND CLASS 05131 ROT 197903
6172D
1.50
6868
EMILIO, SHIRLY
REFUND CLASS 15111 ACT #91904
67721
1.50
3465
ENVIRD -TECH INTERNATIONAL
ORI -WASH N' GUARD CLEANER
67222
74.00
6369
ESCOLA, ROM
REFUND CLASS 05180 ROT 498094
67723
1.50
Z29
EWI.G IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
67724
.08.40
4918
FISSON ROLL DIVISION
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 1 19062
67725
31.30
666
FILAMENT PRO AU0IO
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
#
67726
4T6.05
4947
FOOTE. JAYMIE
REFUND CUSS 9 $171 - ROT 0 96752
6ITZ7
1.50
4946
FOOTE, RAW
REFUND CLASS 9 5111 - ROY 0 96151
6TTZ3
1.50
4934
FOOCE, VERA
REFUND CLASS 8 SISO - ICY 0 98581
0
61729
3 -00
4959
FOSTER. JUDITH
REFUND CLASS 0 $131 - ROT 6 97845
4
67730
3.D0
4960
FOSTER, ROBERT
REFUNO CUSS # 5162 - ACT 0 97842
0
67131
3.OD
1128
FRA.ATIC
13 801 FRAMES
67732
117.33
1144
FRAME -ART
13 11 1 34 FRAMES
67733
1ZZ.57
3494
FREEMAN UNDERGROUND CONST., THOMAS
WORK ON CFO 98 -2 IMPROVEMENTS
6Y134
3.801.97
3494
FREEMAN YNCERGROUNO CGNST.. TNOVAS
WORK ON CFO 89-2 IMPROVEMENTS
67335
7.445.08
3494
FREEMAN UNDERGROUND CONST.. THOMAS
WORK ON CFO 88 -Z IMPROVEMENTS
61136
17.611.23
3494
FREE44M UNDERGROUND CONST.. THOMAS
WORK 0M CFO 88 -2 IMPROVEMENTS
67737
571.08
3494
FREEMAN UNDERGROUND CONST., THOMAS
WORK ON CFD 38-2 IMPROVEMENTS
61118
149.22
3494
FREEMAN UNDERGROUND CONST.. THOMAS
WORK ON CFO 88-2 IMPROVEMENTS
67739
22.341.42
4941
FRY. PAM
REFUND CLASS 4 5171 - ACT 1 97984
63140
1.50
3.74
G G R REFRIGERATION
REPAIR STEAM TABLE
6T 741
08.70
N 152
GE HE'S ALL COLOR PRINT
PHEMOSEAL LIQUID WATERPROOFING
#
67742
139.54
1925
GENGLEA. SANDRA
REFUND CLASS 4 5160 - OCT 4 95906
61 T43
1.50
4936
GILMORE. MINDY
REFUND CLASS 1 5171 - ROT 0 95042
67744
1.50
4966
GONZALES. CHRIS
REFUND CLASS 4 $131 - OCT 0 98195
67745
1.50
4967
GONZALES. TR1NI
REFUND CLASS A 5161 - ROT 1 98194
67746
1.50
650
GRAINGER, W.W.
D-6EAN SPOT KA1
67747
40.31
3489
GRAVES, TERRY
6/10192 - BROWN SAG CONCERT
67 T48
200x40
1900
GRIFFITH RADIATOR SALES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT 1 613
67749
28.50
137
GTE CALIFORNIA
948 -093D
0
61750
35.56
3435
HARRINGTON. LOUISE
INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL - SPRING
6TT51
73.50
2855
HAVEN WINE L LICUOR CO.
CATER LUNCH - (BUDGET)
4
AT751
35.30
2256
MI -LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY
BATTERY - TERMINAL
67753
197.71
4935
HILL, LEE
REFUND CUSS 1 SI80 - ROT A 98583
0
67754
3.D0
2255
MOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - UNIT 4 642
61155
210.11
4937
MONNOLO• RON
REFUND CLASS 1 5171 - ROT 0 96599
67 T56
1.50
1371
HOPPER'S OFFICE FURNITURE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
67757
129.72
4979
HOPPERS, JUDY
REFUND PLAYSCHODL - ACT 1 1293
67750
21.00
4932
MOPPING, MAL
REFUND CLASS 1 5180 - ROT 0 98490
67759
1.50
4933
HOPPINS, HELEN
REFUND CLASS 0 5180 - BIT 0 96491
67760
1.50
4956
MORTON, FICMALINN
REFUND CLASS 6 5171 - ROT 1 97586
67161
4.50
161
%OTT LUMBER CO.. S.M.
FAUCET SPRAY HEAD ONLY
E
67762
23.10
495
XYORO -SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC
SECKSOM HAND PUMP
#
67763
72.70
3055
IN G OUT PAINT L BODY CENTERS
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
67764
250.00
46
INOUSTRSGL ASPHALT
MONTE VISTA - RANCHO CUCAMONGA
L
67165
473.40
907
:.LAND MEDIATION BOARD
LANDLORD /TENANT - MIT 92
67766
591.19
9OS
INLAND MEDIATION BOARD
FAIR HOUSING - MAY 92
61767
826.10
92
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
ACCOUNT 4 107901,4
67768
90.32
4981
INT -L INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL CLERKS
ANNUAL FEE THRU 6/30/93
1
67169
12D.00
CI:TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FUR PERIOD: 06 -10 -92 (91/92)
............................
RUN
DATE: 06110192 PAGE: a
VENDOR
.........
a...•.......................•......
NAME
a uuuu........... uu................
•.............................•
ITEM DESCRIPTION
uuu.. u u u....................0
NIRR NO
u........................uvu............
•...v • v.......v... a...........
NARR. AMT.
H CHECKS
OVERLAP
612
JAESCMKE INC- C.R.
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
61110
259_96
1952
JGnxSO N. KAREN
REFUND CUSS . 5171 -
RCT A
97021
67111
1.50
3022
JOHNSON, VIVIAN
PLAYSCHOOL AIDE /INSTRUCT
-PPE
5/23
61112
150.19
260T
JWP INFORMATION SYSTEMS
TELEPMCNE SERVICE
4
617T3
3.131.75
4963
KEENAN. TERRY
REFUND CLASS 4 5171 -
RCT 4
91981
6777.
1.50
4962
KEENAN. VICKI
REFUND CLASS 4 5171 -
RCT 1
97902
67715
1.S0
4953
KLINGER. COMNIE
REFUND CLASS 1 5171 -
RCT •
9TZ46
67716
1.50
4954
KLINGER, GALENN
REFUND CLASS 1 5111 -
RCT 1
97245
61717
1.50
115
K441T STORES
PLAYGROUND PROGRAM SUPPLIES
C GAMES
61178
287.88
1218
KNOX
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
4
67779
344.83
1024
KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY
SS -1H EMUL
67780
150.23
4468
KULA, JERRCLO
REFUND CLASS F 5162 -
RCT 4
98288
67781
1.50
4969
KULM. LINDA
REFUND CLASS 8 5162 -
PCT A
98287
61182
1.50
4961
LESSEGS. MARY
REFUND CLASS N 5111 -
RCT A
97993
67783
1.50
4443
LITTLE. GECRGE
REFUND CLASS P 5101 -
RCT 1
96590
67784
1.50
49x2
LITTLE, JOYCE
REFUND CLASS 1 5181 -
RCT 4
96591
67795
1.50
4951
LOER, KATHY
REFUND CLASS 1 5171 -
RCY 1
97061
61196
1.50
4950
LOER, TON
REFUND CLASS 4 5171 -
RCT 1
97060
62787
1.50
4964
COFEZ. DEBBIE
REFUND CLASS R 5171 -
RCT 1
97980
67788
1.50
4965
LOPEZ. RICK
REFUND CLASS A SlTl -
RCT 1
97979
61789
1.50'
4955
LONER], ELIZABETH
REFUND CLASS 1 5181 -
RCT 4
97600 4
67790
3.00
4956
LOWERY. AICHAAO
REFUND CLASS 4 5101 -
RCT 1
97601 4
67791
3.00
W4930
LOTT I R. PEG
REFUND CLASS 1 5100 -
RCT A
98365
6T192
1.50
2448
LUORICATIO:, ENGINEERS
ALMAGARD VARI- PUPPOSE
LURE
61793
469.20
4974
LUEGERING. LARRY
REFUND CLASS 1 5181 -
RCY 4
98369
61194
1.50
4972
CUFF. TIM
REFUND CLASS 0 5101 -
RCT 1
98545
6T795
1.50
4929
MAGNON. FLORA
REFUND CLASS I S100 -
RCT 1
97734
6TT96
4.50
2952
MAILSORT, INC.
WEEK ENDING 5130192
67797
74.32
4921
MANILA. DAN
REFUND CLASS 1518D -
RCT 0
9T713
61198
4.50
4926
MANELA, ROSIE
REFUND CLASS 1 5180 -
RCT 4
97712
61799
4.50
549
MARIPUSA HORTICULTURAL ENT.INC.
MAY -92
4
6T800
28.933.87
72
MARK CHRIS, INC.
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE -
UNIT 1
320 4
6TBD1
114.41
450
MARSHALL L MCKNI6MT TONING.INC.
TONING CHARGE
6TSOZ
45.00
4920
MARX. MICHAEL
REFUND CLASS 1 5180 -
RCT 0
97733
618D3
1.50
4957
MEISTER, CHARLATNE
REFUND CLASS 4 5171 -
RCT 1
97596
678D4
1.50
3487
MELCNER. JOHN
REIMBURSEMENT /APA NAT'L CONFERENCE
67805
262.61
889
MEYER. JASON
INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FUIL
-CLASS
16330
67806
99.00
2198
MICHAEL'S CRAFTS
TRAC AWARDS
61807
103.44
749
MIJAC ALARK COMPANY
INSTALLATION N ANIMAL
SMELTER
67808
51629.00
4970
MILLER, HONER
REFUND CLASS 9 5181 -
RCT 0
98379
61009
1.50
4938
MITCHELL, AAIHY
REFUND CLASS 4 5181 -
RCT 4
96593
61810
1.50
4939
MITCHELL. LOREN
REFUND CLASS A 5181 -
RCT 1
96592
61811
1.50
4931
MORRISON, JOT
REFUND CLASS 4 5180 -
RCT A
98436
67812
1.50
403
MORTDN COATINGS. INC. - BAUER
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
67813
673.17
4530
MOSLEY, ANGLE
REFUND CLASS 1 5162 -
ROT 1
97911 1
67814
3.00
4529
MOSLEY. GREG
REFUND CLASS 1 5162 -
RCT 1
97913 1
67815
3.00
842
MOUNTAIN MIEN SMALL ENS. REPAIR
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1
67816
321.20
4971
MS. HEIKE LENL
REFUND- CRAFTER 'ART IN THE PARK'
6781T
15.00
4971
MUDD. DIANE
REF'JNO CLASS 0 5181 -
RCT 1
99370
67818
1.50
4944
MYERS. CHERYL
REFUND CLASS A 5181 -
RCT 4
96569
61819
1.50
49.5
.MYERS. LEONARD
REFUND CLASS A 5181 -
RCT 9
96599
67820
1.50
Cl' I OF RANCH I CUCAM(INGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 06 -10 -92 (91/92)
RUN DATE:
06110192 PAGE: 5
.....vue........•..................
VENDOR
ouuuueu.....uu..uu................uuv....uuv.uu..........uu
...........................................................•
NAME
..u............................
ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO
.uuu....uuuu...uu........uuu....uu..
NARR. AMT.
H CHECK/
OVERLAP
2249
NAPA AUTO PARTS
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
67.21
96.02
3.37
NATIONAL UNIFORM SrRVICE
UNIFORM SERVICES 1
67822
315.35
2'550
NIGRO. ANDREE-
PLAYSCMOOL INSTRUCI04 -PPE 5/31192
61823
118.38
3413
OAR CANYON MATURE CENTER
DAY CAMP TRIP ADMISSION
67824
195.00
4976
OBERFOEL. BETTY
REFUND -BLUE LINE TRIP /RCT 9 8421
67825
32.00
494B
OLSEN, CARMELLA
REFUN9 CLASS A 5171 - ACT F 96734
67826
1.50
4949
OLSEN. CHUCK
REFUND CLASS 4 5171 - RCT 8 96133
67827
1.50
4915
OLSEN, TOM
PARTIAL RFNO /SOFTBLL FEES -RCT 49295
67828
50.00
235
OMEN E_ECTRIC
1/2• FLEX CONN •
67829
266.18
3JA0
P C 0 TECHNOLOGIES
CONSULTANT SERVICES THOU 5/22/92
67830
2.945 -27
2212
PACIFIC IRRIGATION SUPPLY
RISC IRRIGATION SUPPLIES F
61831
426.95
1826
PACTEL CELLULAR
A/C 10421164- VARIOUS NUMBERS
67832
499.36
1823
PIGENET
A/C 4T4T84 -C
67833
55.50
75T
PEP 0075
MISC CAR WASH SUPPLIES
67834
38.61
25BT
PETERSON. TILLI
ICE CREAM FOR SR. BITHDATS 1
67635
99.50
5776
PILCHER. ANNETTE
CLASS REFUND F5181.RCT 498680
67836
1.50
5777
PILCHER, GREG
CLASS REFUND 45181.RCT 498679
67831
1.50
542
PIP PRINTING
PLAYCAMP REGISTRAFI04 FORMS 4
67838
308.92
2682
POSTAGE BY PHONE
RESET METER 670405T, AICALISTIZ89
67839
..000.00
5806
PROMAYE SYSTEMS. INC.
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 121116
67840
8.99
65
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
SHIRTSEPANTS, OTTEN.AOAME.YNIGUE2 1
67841
7Z.61
3441
R L J PRINTING
SPORTS YOUTH REGISTRATION FORMS 1
67842
596.94
«< 67813 -
67043 1>>
R L R AUTOK07XVE
1990 FORD CROWN VIC LIC624AR957 1
61044
4.186.7D
S251
5178
RABONE. JAI
CLASS REFUND 15171. RCT897663
67845
1.5D
5179
ALBINO, KEL4'
CLASS REFUND 15171, RCT497664
67846
1.50
80
RAINBOW PWG10 LAB
FILM 4
61847
122.78
5780
RAMIREI. MARY
CLASS REFUND 15171. RCT197991
67848
1.50
60T
RANCHO CDCAPONGA TROPHY L GIFT
IST.ZN.^.L3RD PLACE RIBBONS
67845
14.21
626
CAUL'S 7141 AND WHEELS
SERVICE CALL L TIRE REPAIR.643.641 4
61850
20.50
5809
REANO. JENNIFER
CLASS REFUND 16035. RCY 896105
67851
35.00
5782
REID. DAVIC
CLASS REFUND 45171. RCT495888
67652
1.50
5181
REID. DEBRA
CLASS REFUND 151T1. 4CT695886
6TS53
1.50
2383
:NOADES OEVELOPMENT
DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT 43267
67054
11000.00
2295
ILEY'S FARM L ORCHARD
OAT CAMP TRIP ADMISSION
61855
290.DO
2T6
'IVERSIOE BLUEPRINT
BLUELINE PRINTS.STAPLING SET5.SETUP4
67056
212.66
1943
ZOFERT BEIM. WILLIAM FROST 1 ASSOC.
PROF END SVCS 1007DT
61857
240.D0
5783
:ODRIGUEZ. TONI
CLASS REFUND 15171, ROT 197933
67858
1.50
5784
'OSSER. JAME
CLASS REFUND 15171. ROT 196603
61859
1.5U
2196
-UGG LUMBER COMPANY. INC.
CHALK FOR SOFTBALL PROGRAM
67860
1TZ.15
2084
SAFECO LIFE INS. CO. GROUP ADMIN.
JUNE PREM -FIRE PERSONNEL - 01-010183
61861
97.54
214
SAN BERN CO SOLID WASTE MOMENT
A/C 1864
67862
3.249.62
5785
SCHMALTZ, JEFF
CLASS REFUND 15171. ACT 496604
61863
1.50
5786
SCOT, CHARLOTTE
CLASS REFUND 15162. OCT 698162
61864
1.50
1'05
SEAL FURMIIGUE C SYSTEMS INC.
MISC REPAIRS ON FURNITURE 4
61065
805.97
5,8T
SHOAR. DENTE
CLASS REFUND .5181. NOT 497406
61066
1.50
5788
SMOAR. TOM
CI ASS REFUND 45181, ROT 197405
61861
1.50
692
514 SPEEDY
BLOGES
61968
45.15
5789
'iISTLER. LCN`LL
CIASS REFUND 15311. ROT 491975
6; 367
1.50
36
i.IOERLE. 8E1
PiTTY CASH 4
6IR70
103.92
3278
SO CALIF ED" ON
52 30 502 6549 01 000 1 A
6TOTI
1.173.49
<<< 67872 -
67476 »>
"V OF RANCHO CUCAX NOR
LISI OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 0E -10 -92 (91/92)
RUN DATE: 06110192 PALE: 6
suu.su....vu.. ..... ... . ........ ......uuu...........uu.... ................. .... ...uuv..... a ....... .... uu.....
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
..............................•.. .......................... u•..............•.....................................................
44 TOTAL 301\606.31
N4 CHECK$
OVERLAP
1432
SO CALIF EDISON- -ASSN: SHEILA LUNA
TO 30 139 0062 02 000 T 1
67817
2.335.21
319
SO CALIF GAS CO.
04 3114 950 6303 1
62818
12.22
5T90
SORONEN. SILVIA
CLASS REFUND 05181. RCT 197999
67879
1.50
5264
SOUTHLAND DEVELOPMENT
DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT 14082 1
67880
1, 150.00
532
SPANGNOLA. SAM
30MRS CPR /LST AID TRNIN6- 5/18 -6/264
67881
124.20
2908
SPOQTIME
FLAG FOOTBALL BELTS
61082
58.85
646
STANDARD IMSbRANCE CD.
JUNE POEM -J. LAM
67883
6D.00
5791
STINSON, BARBARA
CLASS REFUND 15181, ACT 198761
67884
1.50
5792
STIRLING. RALPH
CLASS REFUND 05163. RCT 498663 1
67885
4.50
5643
STOFA, KAREN
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
67886
289 -00
675
T 1 D INSTALLATION. INC.
MISC REPAIRS UNIT 0642
61987
162.19
5807
T 1 R LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC.
OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 820591
61088
13.50
836
TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS
SOLD JETPAK SPRAYER 415
67889
1]1.66
3141
TASERIRON, INC.
FASER 61CAO BATTERY
67890
60.71
3492
TAYLOR. STEVE
IONRS CPR TRAINING -CITY EXPL -5/26
61991
214.50
3187
TMROCMMORTLN. MARC[LA
INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL 16043
67892
79.20
471
TRICO
REPLACE CIRCUIT BREAKERS
67893
51.16
2958
UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION
UMP SERVICE 5/1- 5115/92
67094
11207.00
1054
UNITED TITLE COMPANY
LITIGATION GUARANTEE- FTHLINAVEN SVC
67d95
300.DO
1103
VISTA PAINT
RISC PAINTING SUPPLIES
63896
305.94
5195
WALKINS, BRIDGET
CLASS REFUND 4517L. ACT 191806
67897
1.50
5136
WILKINS. DONALD
CLASS REFUND :5111. RCT 197807
61898
1.50
5191
WARD. KIK
CLASS REFUND 15171. :CT 197597
61994
1.50
213
MAXIE, KLEEN -LINE CORP
MIS& MAINS SUPPLIES 1
67900
369.80
3472
WE GOT -EM ENTERPRISE
KIS WRESTLING T- SHIRTS
67901
296.85
637
NEST ENO UNIFORMS
2 BATON RACKS
67902
32.86
5798
WEST. AMT
CLASS REFUND 45171, RCT 197804
67903
I.SD
5799
NEST, RANDALL
CLASS REFUND 05171. ACT 191805
67904
1.50
S800
WILCOX. ANY
CLASS REFUND :5111. ACT 197999
67905
1.50
5801
WILDE. DEBBIE
CLASS REFUND 15101. RCT 197044
67906
1.50
SBD2
WILSON. RUTH
CLASS REFUND 1201, RCT 81289
67901
21.00
5808
WORKING SHORT
5UBSCNIPTION-J. LAM
67908
57.72
509
XEROX CORPORATION
1040 COPIER A/C19577:2813 1
67909
2.905.40
5103
VANCY, STANLEY
CLASS REFUND 15101. RCT 198205
61910
1.50
5904
YOUNG. TASMA
CLASS REFUND 15171. RCT 098038
67911
150
5805
ZABALA. LORI
CLASS REFUND 45171, RCT 097778
67912
1.50
371
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
MISC 157 AID SUPPLIES 0
67913
359.24
348
2EP MANUFACTURING COMPANY
TER BRAKE VASH.SIG ORG 4EROS.ZEP AL
67914
201.11
44 TOTAL 301\606.31
x.
pe•i0t10 a]•f+51.mn
#Y
rnat rr:l ulH .n irelL :+l nl
k:'ur1 :nlxHt +t °'vrcB+re ....... . .. ...
v94 "i .... ............ .......
....
W. 'M xE :WFS:C113 .................... q•VL55.1:
S p,X WIR rICCK
NErtar SIM IYr 31 VFR 10 NIF
1-r , 1— 1 Ilv ]5].W 1 1,115,15).1A
[ntll] Ull Bnn rH >I xnnlNY rN lxta +ll
rM n tm iwlx l yIrxic x l I xglH 4rygaxt rc51 1 1W.,b. P ! e1q.Hr, e . h x tot,
policy n , W# m tic, F Wnue el
ri= 1Y . toilv t"ntert °,olf" nn nn Jxe pr mLn s xllr [;mt
wl xat wIB t xtne!N npaMrtw at.
piF
nsA.,[
IT to "I"! r
mQXt N
Xvsus]
ors m
;55
,MSSrxrs
ma vuu
=w• °WIA
'an
xrmr.
:o-n�unl
seurvxor
:ntr •:: r!n al tpn:' - 9+nu ...........
..... 9,
=Nnx airxl 1„v<a - Cwpn ................
1.5•R,W) W
].M
I,M
'SE
1.911
7.M
Ar!YV il[eN $n v:!;n ...................1
I,NI•]W .1:
).tl
5.1:7
, i
B.B.]
9. %0
e, pl
995
::3;,
A.111
B.Y?
e.al..........1
i11. T1.M
1.19
IO,OW
P.11:
A.'1.
9.i )0
'TA1 N'hirRX15 w0 ... ................1
:9,ISi,P]B.]i
Ih1.WS
B%
51)
3.155,
S.5t95
#Y
rnat rr:l ulH .n irelL :+l nl
k:'ur1 :nlxHt +t °'vrcB+re ....... . .. ...
v94 "i .... ............ .......
....
W. 'M xE :WFS:C113 .................... q•VL55.1:
S p,X WIR rICCK
NErtar SIM IYr 31 VFR 10 NIF
1-r , 1— 1 Ilv ]5].W 1 1,115,15).1A
[ntll] Ull Bnn rH >I xnnlNY rN lxta +ll
rM n tm iwlx l yIrxic x l I xglH 4rygaxt rc51 1 1W.,b. P ! e1q.Hr, e . h x tot,
policy n , W# m tic, F Wnue el
ri= 1Y . toilv t"ntert °,olf" nn nn Jxe pr mLn s xllr [;mt
wl xat wIB t xtne!N npaMrtw at.
piF
J
b `P Iv_
61. t,eln 1.
V._. a 1' °nPrl9[Il9ar6!'� _ 1 \'ESrAFKi ..
Pn 1=90E1
_ _
.11 xt4[ ckE I'll 9111:I .11 1,.: _ l : 99'=
.PIT
- F iEl:il YNr
Lr9!S
N 1 A,II!A
i 999
y`W c19yutrMrrlvy l YN
+1 w
]M.rA9.99 SMl•0}) -OJ 9M.AM.90 u u oaa }
MCCE 9ux
1, 11
mns9.N II» u:9 c6 esnz
'v` i0 a:
{ry!i i9A.y} 39Jiyn I] ] ^ :9'?'r.M I.IY' 1.!3! I.I19 9911119:
191
I99 1EFi 964
is 19'°_
IA yp :p Fbli"! -'J ;4,611.!0:. J. 9601.91306/
1:
Pl-ILL
I Iii L JM
11,1:
i99,1..,I ]99,94.99 4 .21 u] I/r92
LO
:52
SPEA 1111
:6E6' [S[CIN
1519`
'119M1inJ SN•XA. SY �rD 19 I.IW 1.190 i.;`d 1911:'9:
1.1
;PEAL hii['10
! :1• °:
fM, ^•A.!9 ]M:IG.00 SL9•'J9.91 1.;A^ 1. }M 1.:`d 101::11}
le
115
sRS: N
'
sM.rM.e9 ]J9,•.N 4 5 v 1.:ao 1 .i 11
i}
`5259:9'
SA!iJM.99 ]AOi d.P' I... I.aM/ I.Y9 I.A56 Il llla}
1}I
VIA, ell "PI
ESrfM
}ub.D9'..99 SC9.O M.nO ]M:MM I.S39 I.:SJ I.7. 95'0]/1]
1N
Mll
lqi cgi`=.•
3M.%b. :r WI�4I9.M 361.. ^M :y 1.!39 ,.119 121 ^I /T
E1
'Y91' i9f i} ITEIIII
? a3
A.. 1:111`92
ir0,M9. y] SM M4,M ]M JM :Y. Ilya I.;
Ell
!:3'S VE6r K$r:aP
••r,�}
Lill ,
]9}:1Ti 'IJ YR.199.M ]W,9M n.} :_199 :.}M 1.151 N 1I] /1}
Id
I.e30 IX 1.196 e11:5.91
'19
al �iP
.5 9.
SM'.K'I..y n..OM.M Sn0�9 W.991.p5n 1.930 e I.Irry plilllli
11l
ilP'9'i5r a +0 N.°Kfl
^� :9`•54'} +.. I.f R'9 9• }91.515.:0 1. WF I.MI
159
LSPL Ili, [N[alPill f:Mne
!OfeL M1 MIT le.
1a.9'9.A, 11.0:9•]06.]} ].511
.C. I -AT NEl,' .Is, c'1%
Irll :.1' 90 I•rl'.In 0 Irll' "N.n] ].bPo S.dA} S.e3i
1
111TIltl.- - PII.S
:S.P3 +.306.1' IS ?};liel.S+ 1:;, +1:591.1 +. 5.501 5..1
I
•me0. a6V[r sP15 - C2'9vx
1. Lf =iL M}L vN" x50
.9/a9
].509.09199 t.'M.rM. +J 1.34C.Omg9 ].9s' 2.911 : ?e x1.10' °1
}Sb
'eM 114EP PI[A
"N : :16•
1'9.49",1^ .91. 0.13}91/91111`
:,391
1' N1p
J9 :!r61
11.d01,Y 6.11. I. S"
2!1660.3! :OYMI 6!;: 3:.6^- 1.551 9.d1a 4 /^1119
IT 9E :Y Carp f
MET ?R da,pl.!b 8111}.58 I. 0.]•] 8.°11°3 /LS.AI
'JS t
I
iJ91KS
l,.,
]] 1�9'
11 E-1
1'.9'$.9n I :� Po.3^ 60:.20°.39 I., 8.111 B.'S1 9`
2.115
Irh3 n! 4K.v%f3
.. Ill"... :.19!; 19.!9 I.BR.1M.6 9.92' 0.159
1.3:5
-A 51N` 30 +IK.iS JMIO
. 23'11
1.13'.Ie:.W Ii1C9.'M'99" 1.96i,1113P 9.!P. 3.101 d.W n) /3]!11
5.39]
,[ 199
_ F FpOX:fi
9: 1'Ir9•
.Il apl.p 3. :'MILM. n` 14.311:10 1.1i9 9.313 P.I,`0 21215']]
611:
A. I \ui'RYi : +109Eg69E5
1
V l5 }�l]B.]I SI'1P3�9I3.3: 1+.n3B.JC}.n] :.15:35._SY
51}
•l:x .,
a
, 2,•t.."
III - +
Jred
IAfAIiP! /IW
/iipMSE•.
EM.iSrll:Wl'IES
-. ':.u••; q/Y_••:r uAr
$EnWy mM[c
n9alAC.»
�M)d P(iS Jh91::
(410
Ml:::•$
I: f1,G5. `A
":51: y(Sf iAE]lii
+_W:
SSfI'J 52
IIa1N5.56
mr.+ •nxnE IKK• Ewa
+.'el
m7rm
sa'rno.x
1 =vrr ssea marl
+:6o
n: +7ez
SyrIW.�A
:W:S wEPI (s /a1
A -ra
,sm-:v:
Sn,aw.b
Jm ^. wfc (srzrr
tuo
r,+or,A7
54,AAA:m
`91: ASJI hSl!a•
I.ISO
95 /')l!1'
S,16!1.)P
-m:m slye
+.:x5
nne]a7
Aw,00P.ro
_:rr..•a ECI(I(HE
A,;t:,An.m
zdl4en.W
I,nl,ea.»
l[ M.�i46r,�
6E6!FIy iLL1RF:
.O]
aY,JI JSE41 �WSr :Ay
S.IM
Ii5:100.n
111nA.4
O: F.+ '4it J5FX[Y eWar EIXF:
].6tl0
ir/M.LE
51R'Oae�S ,re f115(5 NER4
IA]:b9.d
1$).n0.'W
Y,WI.W
[N?.14. MylYrS JL[0.A15
hAlylh W.YS(e
.%
NIY if KPI[J
'a.:N
1.117,kf.n
6,ry1�dlA.y
- Iy,M6.p0
lww Mm, Ims :mi
R61y1( WMIE
I:SM,p].GS
.TI.I .!l iMRI11E5
h51y165 MEYEA:
.W
y ff W.11i
B.:W
nBSlf$
1.7,7 1?
?]Y: MR 6 Milo
I.w
'X,!75,17
CWA
'Me1 gy MEP KWF
1.
'XI.M
I,g1.4
Mbt 615P(:M XVl %i
1.10
',1191)2
$]:,10.61
iN` ^.rJLe ul EW. M:.E
. ^.0
I ;nLH
- IIf.9.56
5`4! iFl(56 yri @5!IPIIIP
II61Nly yllfF:
I,IOI,L2.X
AI%F WJ sE['A111E5 -11£M!
IISIyIy SelP(F:
Nl,ipl.p
k1,M6.M
I61R5 ,151(14 WME: J 1175,11$. W
B,Si.,$II.fO
eNt:71I.n
1$:4a� b.6J
CITY OF RANCHO CL"CAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: .June 17, 1992 � 7'
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, Ci °y Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR
THE HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION AND WIDENING, FROM FOURTH
STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, TO BE FUNDED FROM SYSTEMS
FUND, ACCOUNT NO. 22- 4637 -8936 AND FEDERAL AID URBAN (FAU)
FUND, ACCOUNT NO. 24- 4637 -8838
It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications
for the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation and Widening, from Fourth Street to
Foothill Boulevard and approve the attached resolution authorizing the
City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids ".
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff
and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for
construction is $1,038,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for June 26,
and July 3, 1992, with the bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 21,
1992.
Respectfully submitted, n
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MDL:dlw
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. q, -- /S-7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ,RANCHO
CUCAMONGA .APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOP. THE
"HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION AND WIDENING, FROM FOURTH.
STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ", IH SAID CITY AND
AL'ThORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct
certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE) that the plans and specifications
presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the
plans and specifications for "Haven Avenue Rehabilitation and Widening, from
Fourth Street to Foothill Boulevard ".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or
proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and
specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the
City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the
hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 21 day of July 1992, sealed bids or proposals
for the "Haven Avenue Rehabilitation and Widening, from Fourth Street to
Foothill BnpleVard" in said City.
Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the
City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bln> nest be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Haven
Avenue Rehabilitation and Widening, from Fourth Street to Foothill Boulevard ".
PREVAILING 'WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the
Provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1
and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages for holiday end overtime work. In that regard, the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California
is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the
office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center
21
Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any
interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy
of such determinations to be posted at the Job site.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed
for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or
mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore
stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any
subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as
amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the
regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured
apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of
the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or
any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor
employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint
apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and
which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate
of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to
journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of
apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five
except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 1.5 percent in the 90 days prior to
the request for certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio
of one to five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its
membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide
or locally, or
D. 'When the Contractor provides eviaence that he employs registered
apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less
than one apprentice to eight journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for
the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered
apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if
other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the
requirements of Sections 1777,5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and
other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations,
22
ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Frarci son, Cal ito -nia, or
from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all
workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any
subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the
State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division
2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California
as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer,'workman, or mechanic
employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under
him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during
which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman
needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and
subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining
agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified
check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount
equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee
that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded
to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash,
cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest
bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second
lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of
the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract
price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent
(50 %) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment
of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the
work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind
done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a
certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon
work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the
said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will he considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has
not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering
Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
(California Business and professions Code, Section 7000 et, seq.) and rules
and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded.
23
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and
specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the
City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies
�f the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer,
will be iuniished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment
of $35.00, said $35,00 is nonrefundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and
specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment
stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of
$15.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract
satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General
Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work
contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the
Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute
authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject
any and all bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this day of , 19
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, this day of , 19
ATTEST:
ADVERTISE ON: June 26, 1992
July 3, 1992
`z y
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 17, 1992
a
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
RRQfv1: Debra J. Adams, CMG, City Clerk
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO CONTINUE WITH REPRESENTATION BY COUNTY
COUNSEL IN THE L.A. CELLULAR, ETC., V. STATE BOARD OF
EQUALIZATION. ETC., ET AL SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR (-^'JRT
NO. 942131 MATTER
It is recommended that the City Council approve the continuation of
representation by the County Counsel's office in the above referenced
matter and direct staff to correspond with the County Counsel's office
your decision.
As you will recall, the County is to be served with tax refund lawsuits and
is presumed to act on behalf of the cities for which it collected taxes.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga may, pursuant to California Revenue and
Taxation Code Se ^tion 5148, "opt out" of the litigation insofar as
representation by the Oounty Counsel's office. The City has the choice,
under i6e California Revenue and Taxation Code, of defending itself in the
litigation as opposed to having the matter defended by the County
Counsel's office or Attorney General's office on the City's behalf.
The analysis of the City Attorney's office indicates that the City's low
level of involvement in the matter would militate against the City
retaining independent counsel to defend the matter.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
ldja
DATE:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
June 17, 1992 MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND BERBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FROM; BRUCE ZEINER, CSIEF OF POLICE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMEI
BY: JOE HENRY, LIEUTENANT
SUBJECT: SOBRIETY CHECK POINT TRAILER i MATERIALS
Recent information received from the State of California
Office of Traffic Safety indicates that the City of Rancho
Cucamonga is rated number one (1), in comparison with thirty -
five (35) other cities of like size, as it relates to overall
traFfi enforcement and resulting reduction of traffic
collisions.
However, when looking at fatal and injury accidents which are
the result of driving under the influence (D.U.I.) drivers,
our record falls in the 701 range. The 701 range equates to
the number of fatal and injury accidents caused by the D.U.I.
driver. This figure is one of the highest in comparison with
the tnirty -five (35) other cities.
Based upon the above information, we have applied to the
Office of Traffic Safety for a mini - D.V.I. grant in order to
assist us in proactively attacking this problem. We have been
notified by O.T.S. that effective June 1, 1992, our request
hFi been approved in the amount of $13,000 for the purchase of
a sobriety checkpoint trailer, related equipment, and D.U.I.
informational material.
We are hereby requesting the Council to authorize the
expenditure of grant funds in the amount of $11,000 for the
purchase of the trailer and equipment and $2,000 for the
purchase of D.U.I. related informational materials (brochures,
etc.)
BZ:JH:la
cc: Jaok Lam, City Manager
Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager
Chairman and Members of the Public Safety Commission
—CI'PY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA
STAFF RFYORT
r-
DATE: June ll, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ._ .
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda Bee %, Jr. Engineer
SUBJECT: A'd ARO AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR 1992
TREE PLANTING PROGRAM, TO TRAUIWEIN CONSTRUCTION, FOR THE
AMOUNT OF $48,723.00 ($44,293.48 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY), TO
BE FUNDED FROM SBA TREE GRANT, ACCOUNT NO. 124 -4651 -6028
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution
the contract for 1992 Tree Planting Program to the lowest responsive
bidder, Trautwein Construction, for the amount of $44,293.48 and
authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $48,723.00
($44,293.48 plus lOp contingency) to be funded from SBA Tree Grant,
Account No. 124 - 4637 -6028.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on
May 5, 1992, for the subject project. Trautwein Construction is the
apparent lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of $44,293.48 (see
attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $46,500.00. Staff
has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in
accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required
background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements
of the bid documents.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil_
City Engineer
WJO:LB:sd
Attachment
cc: Purchasing
r
y u r•l
�:
l: N Y� ✓' Y I Y. A J: Y'
Y
y
P
f` f, J ✓ N J f v� f, r l V ll
n1
ai
.n '� EE C;
7
CITY OF RANCHO C[ CAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 17, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION
OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH
DEVELOoMENT OF TRACT NO. 10210, LOCATED ACROSS THE SOUTHEASTERLY
PROJECT AREA CONNECTING TO THE EXISTING ALMOND INTERCEPTOR CHANNEL,
SUBMITTED BY FIRST HOTEL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Reimbursement Agreement for installation of a portion of a Master Planned
Storm Drain in connection with development of Tract No. 10210, and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
As a Condition of Approval of Tract No. 10210, First Hotel Investment Corporation
(the developer) was required to install a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain
Facility located across the southeasterly project area connecting to the existing
Almond Interceptor Drain. The storm drain facilities have been completed by the
developer and accepted by the City.
The developer has submitted an itemized accounting of the construction costs of
said Master Planned Storm Drain Facilities. Staff has reviewed and verified the
submittal, The amount due the developer is $725,174.07. He will also receive a
credit of $172,750.00 toward the future drainage fees to be paid upon the
issuance of building permits for the homes within the project.
Respectfully submitted,
6W
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JD:dlw
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. L/i'/,�?Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM
DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT
NO. 10210
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for
its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by First Hotel
Investment Corporation, developer, for the installation of a portion of a
Master Planned Storm Drain Facility located across the southeasterly project
area of Tract No. 10210 connecting to the existing Almond Interceptor Drain;
and
WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed
said storm drain installation; and
WHEREAS, the developer at the time of issuance of the building
permits, has received fee credit from the drainage fees for the amount as
stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that said Reimbursement Agreement be
hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign
Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
attest hereto and cause said Agreement to record.
30
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
and the same is
said Reimbursement
the City Clerk to
Srl[CT5
TRACT No. 10210
IXDCt YAJ
_ - _rir \� _� Ate•' .' .�. •�"
ALTA LOMA
:-' �.f '. -i r'. -: "Y.;.- -'zr.'•"y t`r'y_.
- UPLAND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIDNGA
J TRACT
I
w.= P ANNM S-MIN DRAR! FACMITY wcaM) NO.
'U x, TIT SM ftMAO=Y VRaJBCr APYA CaMBMI C, 10 210
7) � i r +c ALMIM '- VrEPCFPIrR �RKN
- 31
ldl I VC nA,NV nV LVI, is \IV:VIN
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 17, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION
OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH
DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO. 13644, LOCATED IN VISTA GROVE STREET FROM
THE WESTERLY SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE TO THE EASTERLY PROPERTY
BOUNDARY, SUBMITTED BY WOODRIDGE ESTATES, LTD.
RECOPWRDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Reimbursement Agreement for installation of a portion of a Master Planned
Storm Drain in connection with development of Tract No. 13644, and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
As a Condition of Approval of Tract No. 13644, Woodridge Estates, Ltd. fthe
developer) was required to install a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain
Facility located in Vista Grove Street from the westerly side of Hermosa Avenue
to the easterly property boundary. The required storm drain facilities have been
completed by the developer and accepted by the City.
The developer has submitted an itemized accounting of the construction costs of
said Master Planned Storm Drain Facilities. Staff has reviewed and verified the
submittal. The amount due the developer is $108,523.30.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JAD:diw
Attachment
RESOLUTION N0. al�I- I �70
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRnVTNr, REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM
DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT
NO. 13644
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for
its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by Woodridge Estates,
Ltd., developer, for the installation of a portion of a Master Planned Storm
Drain Facility located in Vista Grove Street from the westerly side of Hermosa
Avenue to the easterly property boundary; and
WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed
said storm drain installation.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF 171E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is
hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement
Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to
attest hereto and cause said Agreement to record.
33
PROJECT LOCATION
— s 3d zs %rya ^„i 71,
L A
~l 1SF/
FU=E
3ASELN: _
-
�,` AlilO E��OER�M01]O MYIWI
'M17.7 AiOVAL
..'C 1 {�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TRACT
."ASTER PLANNED 51CRM DRAIN F'AC=TY LOCATED I NO.
:y ViSrA G?0V? s-l= F" ME WEMMY SIDE OF 13644
HUOC6A AVENUE T THE EASTERLY PROPERTY DMMARY
CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 17, 1992 Q
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 'J
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET
IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS -OF -NAY AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VINMAR AVENUE AND NINTH STREET BETWEEN
CALISTIO GOMEZ AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RECCOKNDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution
approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and
Dedication between Calistio Gomez and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
The attached subject Agreement between the City and Calistio Gomez
provides fcr street improvements which include curb, gutter, sidewalk,
street paving and other related work, along the northeast corner portion
of the Gomez parcel. Calistio Gomez, has agreed to grant to the City a
Road Easement to allow for ..e street construction and installation of
the sidewalk improvements for the Vinmar Avenue from Ninth Street to
Chaffey Alley Project.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:HM:ly
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. !�'a- I qO
A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION FROM
CALISTIO GOMEZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
TO SIGN THE SAME
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction
with the Vinmar Avenue from Ninth Street to Chaffey Alley Project; and
WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving
and other related work, located along the northeast corner portion of the
Gomez parcel, shall be made a part of the Vinmar Avenue from Ninth Street to
Chaffey Alley Project; and
WHEREAS, Calistio Gomez has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the
City for said Improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor
and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the
Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
3�
CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 17, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BV: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, TRACT 13566 -1,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE BETWEEN WARDMAN
BULLOCK ROAD AND SAN SEVAINE AVENUE
i7�dS: LC ]Alit ^.F
The required parkway landscape improvements for Tract 13566 -1 have been
completed in an acceptable manner, and it 1s recommended that City
Council accept said improvements into the City's maintained system.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
The subject landscape improvements are in a landscape maintenance
district, are complete and the assessments are in place. Therefore, it
is recommended that the improvements be accepted into the maintenance
district.
At this time, it 1s not recommended to release the Performance Bond or
file a Notice of Completion.
Other adjacent improvements, which do not affect the subject
recommendation but do affect the project as a whole, are not complete at
this time.
DEVELOPER: Rockfield Development
1100 Olympic Drive, Suite 103
Corona, CA 91719
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil..
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:sd
Attachment
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
lure 17, 199E
i0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack :.am, AICP, City Mananer
FRO:'.: Jerry Grant, Building Official y !e
S'JBJEC7: ADOPTION OF LATEST EDITIONS OF THE MODEL CODES
It is recommended that the City Council conduct a hearing and hold first
reading of the acconpanyi ng ordinance which wi II adopt the 1991 Editions of
the Uniform Codes listed in the ordinance.
BACKGROUND
The accompanying crdinance will bring all of the City's Building Regulations
into line with all of the latest codes adopted by the State Dui l ding Standards
Commission. Under State statute, certain specified model codes must be
adopted into the State Building Standards code wil.hin 180 days of their
publication. Local jurisdictions have an additional 180 days for adoption of
those codes, with amendments, or State Regulations automatically go into
effect. (The date for local adoption to avoid automatic application of the
State Regulations is July 1, 1992).
Additionally, modifications made by local agencies to the technical
regulations adopted by the state (those affecting residential construction)
rdy only become effective if the local jurisdiction makes express findings of
need for change, due to local conditions. Further those modifications must
relate to local geological, topographical or climatic conditions and are to be
filed with the State Department of Housing andCommunity Development in order
to become effective.
The only portion of City Building Regulations not proposed for this adoption
package is the latest edition of the National Electrical Code whicn we adopted
in the fall of last year.
Finally, a Resolution of express findings of need for our local modifications
of the State Requirements will be prepared for adoption at the second reading
of the ordinance.
STAFF REPORT
ADOPTION OF LATEST EDITIONS OF THE MODEL CODES
June 11, 1992
Page 2
ANALYSIS
Nearly all of the changes that have taken place in the published new editions
of the code are of technical in nature. The most significant change is one
that will require additional smoke detectors in residential sleeping rooms.
Our own modifications, which comprise most of the ordinance are relatively
unchanged from our current regulations.
It skould be noted that administrative provisions and regulations, addressing
elements of construction that are not regulated by the State Building
Standards Code, need not meet the test of being necessary due to "geological,
topugraphical or climatic" conditions. Therefore, the Resolution of express
findings of local need, to be provided for second reading of the ordinance
will only address those issues pertinent to the issues that are different from
these adopted by the State.
SURIIARY
State law requires that we adopt certain model codes covered by the
accompanying ordinance. The building, plumbing, and mechanical codes adopted
as a part of the ordinance meet the responsibilities of state mandates; the
remaining codes included in the adoption will bring our building regulations
into consistency with the very latest available code technology and city
modifications deemed necessary previously. A Resolution of findings of local
need will be provided to the Council for consideration at the second reading
of the Ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
Jerry R. Grant
Building Official
JG:ll
39
REMIXIr10N NO.
'?G• • • L I M K' { • 11 • • V
11••J 91i •.` II a g1k; '1.• •1 1 1 4 41W
:u412FA4, the cotw�lction of public landscape imWvmmmts for Tract
13566 -1 have been CMpleted to the satisfaction of the City Ergineer; and
WFRMM, a Notice of Ocopletion is required to be filed, certifying
the work 03plete.
NOW, TIffIWCU, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the city Fhgineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Cmpletion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
OA4II:NCCF. NO. 497
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY 011RCII, OF THE CITY OF PANC7D
CUCAWi3 , CAISFUid7IA, A OMD C CHAPPiRS 15.04, 15.08,
15.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.28, 15.32, 15.36, 15.40, AND 15.44
OF TTPLE 15, WMINGS AND CCNSIINUCPION, OF THE RANGD
CUO MOt43A MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY ;NICE THE
"UNUtE N ADMINISIRALPIE CODE, 1991 EDITION; THE INIFcFK
BUILDING CODE, 1991 EDTITON INCLUDING AIL APPENDICES
THERETO; THE -UfIFC M BUILDING CODE S17nNDAR S ", 1991
EDTTICN; THE "UiIFUN MOCHMICAL CODE', 1991 EDITION,
INCLUDING AIL APPENDICES THERETO; THE "WrFa?R PIIMBING
CODE', 1991 EDITION INCUDING AIL APPENDICES; THE -U IIFCM
CODE FOR THE AHATIMM OF DA MnE BUI DINGS ", 1991
EDITION; 'DIE - LWIFCFdl H SING CODEI, 1991 EDITION; THE
"U IFtF 4 BUIIDING SE' RTN CDUE, 1991 EDMON; AND THE
"I-=
RTF(YSS Z 1991. EDTFIQN; WITH CEFM! AMWF)-
MENIS, AUDITIONS, DELETIONS AND EKCEMONS TO SAID CODES,
INCIVDDNG PENALTIES
A. Recitals.
(i) Article 2 of Ulapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the
California Government. Code authorizes the adoption, by reference of the Uniform
Administrative Cade, 1991 Edition; the Uniform Building Code, 1991 Edition; the
Uniform Building Code St Klards, 1991 Edition; the Uniform Mechanical Code,
1991 Edition; the Uniform Plumbing code, 1991 Edition; the Uniform Code for
Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1991 Edition; the Uniform Housing Code, 1991
Edition; the Uniform Building security Code, 1991 Edition; and the Uniform sign
Code, 1991 Edition, each as published by the International Conference of
Building Officials and /or the International Association of Plumbing and
Mednazucal Officials.
(ii) At least one copy of each of said Codes and Standards certified
as full, true and correct copies thereof by the City Clerk of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga have been filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga in acoordance With the provisions of Goverrmennt Code Section
50022.6.
(iii) A duly noticed public hearing, as required by California
Governmw.nt Code Section 50022.3, has been oDtducted and concluded prior to the
adoption of this ordinance.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this ordinance have
."A"M"._
NOW, THEREFORE, the City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby fLrl, determine and ordain as follows:
qO
Ordinance No. 497
Page 2
SECTIW 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of
this Ordinance.
S) CN 2: Title 15 of the Raman Cucamonga Municipal Code, entitled
Buildim. and 9gmtrnetion, of the City CUUncil of the City of Rancho Cicamorga
are hereby amended, provided that said amaxIment shall not apply to or excuse
any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective date of this Ordirn:ce
and provide further that the ikvfanm codes as adapted herein by reference ecru
amended by Ordinance No. 412 of this City shall ccmrtirn to be applicable tc
construction for which permits have been issued prior to the effective date o}'
this Ordinance.
SD=CN 3: Chapter 15.04 of tha Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:
15.04.010 Codes Adoption
15.04.010 Codes Adoption. The "Oniform Administrative Code ", 1991
rAition; the "Uniform Building Code ", 1991 Edition, including all apperdices
thereto; the "Uniform Building Codes Standards ", 1991 Edition; the "Uniform
Mechanical Oode" 1991 Edition including all appendices thereto; the "Uniform
Plumbing Code" 1991 Edition, including all appedices Thereto; the " _Tnform
Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings ", 1991 Edition; the IVniform
Housing die ", 1991 Edition; the "Ifiiform Building security Oode, 1991 Edition;
and the "Uniform Sign Code ", 1991 Edition; are hereby adopted in their entirety
as the Building and Constriction Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
together with the amend n , additions, deletions and exceptions set forth in
Chapters 15.08 through 15.44 below.
7 ?4Mbi'N r's.W s r 1 r.. -
Qlacter 15.08
Administrative Code
Sections:
15.08.010
Section 202(c) Amended — Right of Entry
15.08.020
Section 204 Amended — Appeals
15 08.030
Section 205 Deleted
15.08.040
Suction 301(a) Amended— permits Required
15.08.050
Section 301(6)1. AmmxWd— Building permits
15.08.060
Section 301(b)5. Added -- Grading permits
15.08.070
Section 302(b) Amended —plans and Specificatiers
15.08.080
Section 303(x) Amended— ISeuanoe
15.08.090
Section 303(d) Amended — Expiration
41
ordir No. 497
Page 3
15.08.100
Section 303(f)
Added — Unfinished Buildings
15.08.110
Section 304 Amended —Fees
15.08.120
Section 305(h)
Amended— Feinspectio s
15.08.130
Section 305(1)
Added— Repeated Reirspections
15.08.140
Section 307 Amended— structural observations
15.08.150
Section 307(a)
Amended—Energy Connections
rF O80 ^1.0 Section 202(c) Amended —Right of F]iby. Section 202 (c)
of said Uniform Administrative Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 202(c) Right of Entry. The Building official, or his duly
authorized representative, shall have the authority to enter any
building or premises for the purpose of investigating the existenm of
suspected or reported damage or defects which constitute an immediate
danger to Mean life or an iuvediate hazard to public safety or
health. Dmept in emergency situations, the Building Official, on his
authorized representative, shall not enter any occupied building or
premise.; without the consent of the owner or occupant thereof, unless
he possesses a warrant authorizing entry and search of the premises.
No person shall hinder nor prevent the Building Official, or his
authorized representative, while in the performance of the duties
herein described as emergency situations or while in possession of a
warrant, from entering upon and into any and all premises under his
jurisdiction, at all reasonable haws, for the purpose of inspecting
the same to determine whether or not the provisions of this cede, the
referenced technical arks and all other applicable laws or ordinances
pertaining to the protection of persons or property are observed
therein.
,15.08.020 Section 204 Amended —Ajp94 c. Section 204 of said Uniform
Administrative code, is hereby amended to read as follows:
section 204(x) Appeals. A decision of the Building official regard-
ing interpretation or implementation of any provision of this Title,
the Uniform Administrative Cole, 1991 Edition, or the technical codes
referenced therein shall be final and shall became effective forthwith
upon the service of the decision of the Building official, in writing,
upon the permutes, applicant or other person affected by the
decision, hereafter called permittee. For purposes of this section,
service upon the permittee shall mean either personal delivery or
placement in the ifiited States Mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to
the permittee at his bast known business address; provided, however,
that the permittee may, within 10 days after the effective date of
service of the decision of the building Official., file an appeal with
the city Clerk, in writing, specifying the reason or reasons for the
appeal and requesting that the Board of Appeals review the decision of
the Building official.
(b) Board of Appeals. The City Council or such other 5 persons,
other than employees of the City, that the City Council may appoint,
shall act as a Baud of Appeals in making a final determination of any
appeal filed in accordance with the provisions of Subsection (a) of
this Section. The City Clerk shall schedule a hearing on the appeal
at reasonable times and at the convenience of the Board of Appeals,
but not later than 30 days after receipt of the written appeal.
Y
O:dinalxE `n . 497
Page 4
The Permitcee may appear in Person before the Board or be represented
by an attorney and may introduce evidence to support his claim. The
Building Official shall transmit to the Board all records, papers,
docents and other materials in support of his decision and shall
provide a copy thereof to the permittee appealing the decision of the
Building Official. The permittee appealing the decision of the
Building Official shall cause, at his awn expense, any tests or
research required by the Board to substantiate his claim to be
performed oc otherwise carried art. The Board may continue such
appeal hearing fnm time to time as deemed necessary by the Board.
The Board nay, pry resolution, affirm, terse, or modify in %tole or
in Part, any appealed decision, determination or interpretation of the
Building Official. A copy of the resolution adopted by the Board
shall be mailed to the permittee and the Board's decision shall be
final upon the mailing, by United States Mail, postage Prepaid, to the
permittee's last krxm h address of record.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, appeals filed in relation to sub-
standard residential buildings shall be paooessed in accordance with
Section 203 of the Uniform Housing oode and appeals filed in relation
to a dangeroue Wilding shall be processed in accordance with Section
205 of the Uniform Clads for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings.
15 08 030 Section 205 De laticps and Penalties, section
205 of said Uniform Administrative CUde is berebr deleted.
15 08 040 Sectim 301 fat Amerde3— Permits uo•.�,i r+ad. section 301(a)
of said Uniform Administrative Code is hereby Amended to read as follows:
Section 301(a) Permits Required. Ems pt as specified in Slnbsection
(b) of this section, no building, structure, site preparation or
building service equipment regulated by this code or the ta3mical
codes adopted by this Title shall be iced, erected, constructed,
enlarged, altered, repaired, removed installed, converted or
demolished unless a separate appropriate permit for each building,
structure, site preparation or building service equipment has first
been obtained from the building official.
A separate grading Permit shall be required for each site and may
cover both excavations and fills.
Separate building permits shall be obtained for major drainage
structures and retaining walls sudmitted for checking as a part of a
grading Plan.
I: I I .� Y _ RI 1 :lL ".It: r. •. J! S -. 4f1. 1
Section 301(b) 1. Building Permits. A Wilding Permit shall not be
required for the following:
A. One story detached accessory buildings used as tool and storage
sheds, playtnases, and similar uses, provided the projected roof
area does not exceed 120 square feet.
11-S
0rdinance No. 497
Page 5
B. Wood, chainlink, plastic, metal or similar fences not over 6 feet
in height above the lowest adjacent grade.
C. Oil derricks.
D. Movable cases, counters nn: partitions not odes 5 feet, 9 irztnes
high.
E. Retaining walls and masonry fences which are not over 3 feet in
height above the lowest adjacent grade, unless supporting a
surcharge load or intended for inpanxiing flamoable liquids.
F. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does
not exceed 5000 gallons and the ratio of height to diameter or
width does not exceed two to one.
G. Platforms, walks and driveways rot more than 30 inches above
grade and not over any basement or story below.
F. Painting, papering and similar finish work.
I. Temporary motion picture, television and theater stage sets and
scenery.
J. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall of Group R, Division
3, aryl Group M Ooa>pancies when projecting net more than 54
inches from the supporting wall.
K. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to a Group R, Division 3
Oceupanoy in which the pool walls are entirely above the adjacent
grade aryl if the capacity goes not exceed 5000 gallons.
L. The changing or the advertising copy or message on a painted or
printed sign.
M. Painting, repainting er cleaning of an advertising stnrhrrn
provide9 no structural charges are made.
N. Signs loss than 6 feet above grade that are not electrically
lighted.
o. barging of theater marquees and similar signs specifically
designed for the use of changeable copy.
Unless otherwise exaWted by this code, separate plumbing, electrical
and mechanical permits are rsquired for equipment installed in
conjunction with the above emnhrd items.
Section 301(b)5. Grading Permits. A grading permit is not reluired
for the following:
4y
Ordinance No. 497
Page 6
I. Removal of surface deposits of inpr perly placed material or
_ efuse.
2. An excavation belw finished grade for h?s,. ents and footings of
a building, retaining VRll or other structure autlarized by a
valid building permit. This shall not emmpc any fill made with
the material from such excavation m exert any excavation
having an unsupported height greater than 5 feet after the
completion of such structure.
3. Cemetery craves.
4. Refuse disposal sites controlled by other regulations.
S. Excavations for wells or tunnels w utilities.
6. Mining, quarrying, excavating, processing, stockpiling of rock,
sand, gravel, aggregate or clay where established and provided
for by law, provided such operatics do not affect the lateral
Support or increase the stresses in or Pressure upon any adjacent
or contiguous property.
7. Exploratey exavatim urrcher the direction of soil engineers or
engineering geologists.
8. An excavation which (a) is less than 2 feet in depth, or (b)
ull-ach does not create a cut slope greater than 5 feet in Might
and steeper than two horizontal to one vertical (2:1) and which
does wt a :owed 100 cahbic yards.
9. A fill less than 1 foot in depth; placed on natural terrain. with
slope not exeeed.ing five horizontal to one vertical (5:1),
provided that the grading is in an isolated, self - contained area
and does not endanger private or public property.
10. A fill less than 3 feet in depth and not exceeding 100 cubic
yards, placed on a single Parcel, provided that the fill is not
intended to sign, ort str=ttirw :: docs not obstruct a drainage
course.
11. An excavation for pipeline or other underground utility lines
installed under a separate permit, provided that any neoessaty
erosion control measures are made part of that permit.
12. Public Forks projects not requiring a building permit including
seamy and storm drain mnstnhction, utility trenches, Power
transmission lines and appurtenant access roads and retaining
walls or grading aocooplished as part of street maintenance
activities.
13. Recurring, regularly scheduled maintenance of existing facilities
where no new construction is involved.
45
Ordinance No. 497
Page 7
14. )3mergeM7 repairs to existing facilities resulting from natural
or civil disaster including, but not limited to, rainstorm,
flooding, eartbslide, heat storm, earthquake, riot, sabotage, and
the like.
Ekemption from the permit requixavents for grading work shall not be
deemed to grant authorization-, for any work to be done in violation of
the grading provisions or any other l-cvs or ordinances of this
jurisdiction.
15.08.070 Section 302(b) Amended —Plans and Stnecifications. section
302(b) of said Uniform Administrative Cede is hereby —enied to read as
follows:
Section 302(b) Plans and Specifications. Plans, engineering calcula-
tions, diagrams and other data shall be submitted in one or more sets
with each application for a permit. idheh such plans are not prepared
by an architect or engineer, the building official may require an
applicant submitting such plane or other data to demonstrate that
state law does not require that the plans be prepared by a license:
architect or engineer. The building official may require plans,
oouputations and specifications to be prepared and designed by an
engineer or architect licensed by the state to practice as such even
if not required by state law. shtmittals shall include construction
inspection requirements as defined in Section 302(c).
The building official may waive the submission of plans, calcula-
tions construction inspection req inmwnts, etc., provided it is
ford that the nature of the weak applied for is such that
reviewing of plane is not necessary to obtain ocupliance with
this code.
Grading Permits may be issued based upon submittal of either a
Preliminary or . final grading plan. (See Sections 7005 and 7006 of
the Unifc-,. Building Code Appendix, as amended, for grading plan
i, aornation) .
15.08.080 Section 303(a) AManded— ISSUanrz. Section 303(a) of the
Uniform Administrative Code is heronry amended to read as follows:
Section 303(a) ISSUanm. The application, plans and specifications,
and other data, filed by an applicant for permit shall be reviewed by
the Building Official and may be reviewed by other departn i is of this
jurisdiction to verify c oWlianee with any applicable laws under their
jurisdiction. If the Building Official finds that the work described
in the application for a permit and the plans, specifications and
other data filed therewith conform to the requirements of this code
and the technical codes and other pertinent laws and crdinhanees, and
that the fees specified in section 304 have been paid, he shall issue
a permit therefor to the applicant.
`l
Ordinance 270. 497
Page 8
r won•
Electrical permits shall only be issued to a person of
persons qualifying under one or more of the following
categories:
a. A state licensed contractor or authorized representa-
tive of a state licensed contractor but only to the
extant and for the work the person is licensed by the
State of California to do.
b. A bonafide owner of a single family dwelling for
electrical WXrk within that dwelling, including
buildings and quarters aocesscuy thereto.
C. A representative of a charitable, non-profit organiza-
tion for temporary work in connection with Christmas
tree lots, carnivals and similar norr- permanent
installations, provided that work covered by the permit
is to be performed by ur bers of the organization and
furthermore that there are to be no persons aiployed at
the location uth such temporary wiring is installed.
Such permit shall expire within a time specified by the
Building official, not exceeding 6 months time, and
shall not be renewed.
d. A representative of another city, minty, state,
district or other political subdivision for electrical
work to be perforated on the premises of said political
subdivision.
$N en the Building official issues a permit where plans are required,
he shall endorse in writing or stamp the plans and specifications
"APPR[>•M ". Su chh approved plans and specifications shall not be
changed, modified or altered without authorimtion from the Building
Official, and all work shall be core in amrdance with the aprXoved
plans.
The Building official may issue a permit fcr the construction of part
of a building, strUCtare or building service equipment before the
entire plane and specification for the whale Wilding, structure w
Wilding service equip cent have been submitted or approver], provided
adequate information and detailed statements have been filed crnplying
with all pertinent requirements of the technical codes. The holder of
such Permit shall prooeed at his own risk without assurance that the
Permit for the entire building, structure or Wilding service will be
granted.
{. t: 1•I �y r• r :1L.Lf}. >.M S• rd 1
Section 303(d) Expiration. EVerY permit issued by the Building
official under the Provisions of the technical codes shall expire by
limitation and become null and void, if the building or work
4�
Ordinanoe No. 497
Faye 9
authorized ny such permit is rot a maned within 180 days from the
date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by suds
permit is s„spenned or abandoned at any time after the work is
ccmneroed for a period of 380 days. Before such work can be
reCOMenoed, a new permit shall be first obtained to do so, and the
fee therefore shall be one-half the amount required for a new permit
for such work, provided no changes have been made or will be made in
the Original plans and specifications for such work; and provided
further that such suspension or abarhdocrent has not exceeded one year.
Any permittee holding an unexpired permit may apply for an extension
of the time, within which to amerce work order that permit, when he
is unable to ec� work within the time required by this section
for goof and satisfactory reasons. The Buildim official may extend
the time for action by the permittee, for a period rot exceeding 180
days, upon written request by the permittee show that cixcummtanoes
beyond the control of the permittee have prevented action from being
taken. No permit shall be extended mote than once.
15.08.100 Station 303(f) Pdded— C*.+fi iWv.a guild =*±as. Section 303
of said Uniform Adainisrrative CUrle is hereby amended by adding subsection (f)
to read as follows:
Section 303(f) Unfinished Buildings and Structures. 4dnnnever the
Building Official determines by inspection that work in or on any
building or structu a for which a permit has been issued and the work
start thereon has been suspected for a period of 180 days or moue,
the owner of the property upon which such building or struutr is
located or other person or agent in control of said property, upon
receipt of notice in writing from the Building Official to do so,
Shall, within 90 days from the date of such written notice, obtain a
new permit to complete the required work and diligently pursue the
work to completion or shall remove or demolish the building or
structz within 180 days from date of the written notice.
15-08-110 Section 304 Amended—Fees. Section 304 of said Uniform
Administrative Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 304(a) Permit Fees. Md fee for each permit shall be as
established by Resolution of the City Council. The determination of
value or valuation uurlex acrd of the provisions of this eocie shall be
made by the Building official. The value to be used in computing the
building permit and building plan review fees shall be the vital value
of all construction work for which the permit is issued as well as all
finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, boating, air -
conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing system and wry other
permanent equipment.
ddhenever any work, for which a permit is rsguired by this Code, has
been commenced without first obtaining said permit, and when such work
is discovered as a result of an investigation by the Building official
or his duly authorized representative, the permit fees specified by
the City council shall be doubled. The payment of ash double fee
shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions
of this node nor from any penalty prescribed by law.
IM-1
Ordinance No. 497
Page 10
(b) Plan Review Fees. When a plan or other data is required to be
submitted by Subsection (b) of Section 302, a plan review fee shall be
paid at the time of submitting plans and specifications for review.
Payment of a plan review fee shall be considered as permit application
only for the work described on the application form and for which the
plan review fee is paid.
Misre plans uxe inooWlete or longed so as to require additional plan
review, an additional plan review fee shall be charged.
Fees for plan review shall be as set forth by city Council Resolution.
Where preliminary and final grading plans are submitted separately for
plan checking and or permit, fees shall be calculated from the work to
be aaotplished under each submittal.
(c) Expiration of Plan Review. Applications for which no permit is
issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire
by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may
thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the &aiding
Official in aecnrdance with law.
The Building official may extend the time for action by the applicar.,,
for a period not exceeding 180 days, upon written request, showing
that circumst� beyond the control of the applicant have preventiJ
action from being taken. No application shall be extended more than
once. In order to renew action on an application after expiration,
the applicant shall resuhmit plans and pay a rev plan review fee.
(d) Ervmpti.on PYcm Fees. Neither the State nor any other county,
city, district, or other political subdivision, nor any public offices
or body acting in his official capacity on behalf of the State or of
this or any minty, city, district, or other political subdivision
shall pay or deposit any fee required by this code. This section (.hoer,
rot apply to the State Ompessation Insurance Rnd or Public Housing
Authority or where a public officer is action with reference to
private asset- ti ich have come under his jurisdiction by virtue of his
office.
(e) Refunds. In the event that any person shall have obtained a
permit and no portion of the work or anstrrxtion covered by ranch
permit stall have been oceneneei and provided such permit has not
expired as provided for in Subsection (d) of section 303, the
permittee, upon presentation to the Building Official of a written
request, shall be entitled to a refund Li an amount equal to 80
percent of the permit fee actually paid for such permit; however, the
portion of the fee retained by the City shall never be less than
twenty dollars ($20.00) or the total amount paid., whichever is less.
In the event a permit is issued in error by the Building Official, all
fees shall be returned to applicant upon written request.
Li I
No portion of a plan, checking
checking has been performed on a
percent of the plan checking fee
portion of the fee retained shall
($20.00), or the total amount paid,
Ordinance No. 497
Page Il
fee stall be refunded, unless no
set of plans, in which case so
stall be xefurded; haever, the
never be less than twenty collars
whichever is less.
No refund shall be granted on an expired permit or plan review.
The Building official stall satisfy himself as to the right of such
applicant to such refund and each such refuel shall be paid as
provided by law for the payment of claims against the city.
15.08.120 ion 305(h) Ametded— Feinwrecticns. section 305(h) of
said Uniform Administrative Code is hereby amid to read as follows:
Section ?05(h) Reinspectims. A reinspec-tim fee, as set forth in
City Council Resolution, may be assessed for each inspection made
necessary We to work not being ready at the requested time of
insPection, or for work not corrected after the issuance of a prior
written correction notice or for a reirnspectim made necessary because
of faulty or deficient workmanship or materials of construction
regulated by this code or the technical codes adopted hereby, in
instances where reinspeations fees have been assessed, no additional
inspection of the work shall be performed until the required fees have
been paid.
15 08 130 Section 305(') m ne,.e,-r . section 305
of said Uniform Arbiinist.ative Code is hereby amended by adding subsection (i)
to read as follows:
Sectim 305(1) Repeated Reinspec:tionns, in the event that, as related
to any one or two family dwelling or any multiple family building for
which a building permit has been issued, and a second reinspectim has
been Performed in amordance with subsection (h) above, and further
reirspection it: determined by the Building official to be necessary to
achieve the perfcumaroe of amspted construction practices related
thereto; or in the event that second reinspectiore have been required
three or more times within any project, the Building official shall
require posting of a cash deposit to be drawn upon to omter costs of
providing inspection and /or reinspectim of the dwelling unit(s), or
project, on a full time basis. Further, all inspections for the
dwelling nmit(s), or project shall be suspended until such time as the
deposit is received and jUdgMd by the Building Official to be
sufficient to coWlete inspection of the work remaining.
The estimated costs of providing this increased level of inspection
shall be determined by the Building Official in accordance with a
Resolution of the City Council establishing hourly changes.
Additionally, the deposit shall be based upon a reasonable determina-
tion of the time necessary to omplete the entire building or project
which the dwelling unit or units or multiple- family building is a
part .
rji)
Ordnance No. 497
Page 12
The expenses incurred by the City in providing additional inspections
shall be deducted from the deposit posted and any remaining balance
shall p returned to the depositor upon completion of the dwelling
unit(s) or project. Upon determination by the Building Official that
the original deposit is insufficient for any remaining ng inspection
costs an additional cash deposit shall be provided for completion of
all anticipated inspections.
For the purpose of this subsection a "probed" is two or more
residential buildings being constricted under separate building
permits within or upon an individual tract map, parcel map or parcel.
15.08.140 Section 307 Amended— Strurhsal Observation. Section 307
of said Uniform Administrative code is hereby amended to read as follods:
Section 307 Structural Observatim. Shall he provided when one of
the following conditions exists:
1. The structure is defined in Table No. 23 -K as Osupancy Category
I, II or III, or
2. The structure is required to comply with section 1807 Uniform
Building Cade, of
3. Construction inspection as defined in Sectim 302 (C) , Item 2 is
rimed, or
4. bdhen such observation is specifically required W the building
official.
The caner shall employ the engineer or architect responsible for the
structural design, or another engineer or architect designated by the
engineer or architect responsible for the structural design to perform
stnxt+mal yia r or c.v`Litect shall slant a
statement in writing to the building official stating that the site
visits have been made and whether ar not any observed deficiencies
have been corrected to conform to the approved plans and specifica-
tions, or to revised details approved by the buildirg official.
15.08.150 Section 39Q(a) Avenled—Energy Owmect section
308(a) of said Lhiform Adninistrati�m Code is hereby amended to read as
Section 307(a) Energy Connections. No person shall make Connections
from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service
equipment which is regulated by the technical codes and for which a
permit is required by this code, unless such required permits are
obtained and applicable final building, electrical, plumbing and /or
mechanical inspections have been made and all oxditiens of
developmit approval have been completed or guaranteed, except as
provided for in aibsec:tim 307(b).
5�
Ordinance No. 497
Page 13
SBTSC4 5: Capter 15.12 of the Randno Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read., in words and figures, as follows:
Claoter 15.12
euil3ine code
Sections:
15.12.010 Chapters 1,2,3 Deleted
15.12.020 Section 420 Added definiticn=Rd ing Pool
15.12.030
Section 1101 Amended —Grn '?P' Occupancies
15.12.040
Section 1103 Amended— Fire-Resistive Protection
15.12.050
Section 1107 Added— SWilmhing Pool Fencing
15.12.060
Table 23-) Amended — Allowable Deflection
15.12.070
Table 25- U-R-10 Deleted
15.12.080
Section 2907(b) Ame led— Bearing Walls
15.12.090
Figure 29-1 Amended— Building Setbacks from Slopes
15.12.100
Section 32014(d) Ameded- 1krwated Ri^f Covering
15.12. 110
Section 3204(a) Deleted
15.12.120
Section 3208 (b) 3 Amended— Asphalt Shingles
15.12.130
Section 3208(0)5 Amended —Clay or Concrete Tile
15.12.140
Table 32-A Noaded— 1inimum 131of classes
15.12.150
Table No. 32 -B-1 Ameded— Shingle Application
15.12.160
Table NOIS, 32-D -1 and 32-D-2 Amended— Roofing Tile
Application for All Tiles
15.12.166
Section 3802 (b) Amended -Klufp R, Division 1,
Occupancies
15.12. 168
Subsections 3802(1), (j) and (k) Added- -(ramp R,
Division 1, Occupancies and Reoonstiuct'ed Buildings
15.12.172
Section 3803 Amended— Sprinkler System Supervision
Alarms
15.12.176
Appendix Chapter 12 Deleted
15.12.180
Appendix Section 3210 Ameded— Reroofing
15.12.190
Appmxlix Section 7003 Deleted — Permits Required
15.12.200
Appendix Section 7004 Ameded— Hazardous Grading
15.12.210
Appendix Section 7005 Added Definitions— Final,
Preliminary Grading Plans
15.12.220
Appendix Section 7006 Amended —Plans and
Specifications
15.12.230
Appendix Section 7007 and Tables 70-A, 70 -B Deleted
15.12.240 Appendix Section 7008 Ameded—Bords
15.12.250 Appendix Section 7010 Amended —Fills
15.12.260 Appendix Section 7013 Amended— Erosim Controls
15.12.010 Chapters 1, 2, and 3 of
said Uniform Building Code are bereby deleted in their entirety.
15,12,020 Seption 420 A*kd Definiticn—Swimning Pool. Section 420
of said Uniform Building Czde is hereby amended by addition of the following
Section 420. Sw +nmGirg Pool. Is any body of water created by
artificial means designed or used for swimming, immersion or
therapeutic purposes.
52
ordinna a No. 497
Page 14
15.3.2.030 Section 1101 Ambndsd--Grow M ODAMancies. Section 1101
of said Uniform Building Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 1101. Gtop m o=Ipamies. Shall be:
DiVisim 1. Private Garages, carports, sheds and similar
stnx-•tures accessory to residential structures, and agriahltural
buildings.
Division 2. Masonry Walls over 3 feet high, fences over 6 feet
high, tanks, towers and swimming pools.
F'or oco>pan cy separations, see Table 5-B.
15.12.046 Seg icn 1103 Amanded —Fire HgsjAjw _ — section
1103 of said Uniform Building Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 1103. Fire resistive Protecticn. For fire resistive protec-
tion of exterior walls and openings as determined by location on
property, see Section 504, Part IV, and Appendix Chapter 11.
Section 1107. Shimming Pool Fencing. Every person in poesseeim of
land under a emltract, or as avner, lessee, tenant, licensee, on
otherwise, upon which is situated a swimming pool, having a water
depth exceeding 18 moss, shall, at all times, maintain a fence or
other structure completely surrounding such pool and extending not
less than 5 feet, measured vertically, above arty walking surface, wall
or other climbable structure, within 2 feet of the exterior of the
enclosure. Opatilrgs in such fence on structure, re, other than those
created by gates or doors, shall be of such size so that a sphere
exceeding 4 inches in diameter will rot pass between adjacent
members. Members of such pay enclosure shall not be arranged so as
to materially facilitate climbing or scaling by small children.
Gates or door openings through such enclosure shall to equipped with
self - closing and self - latching devices designed to keep, and capable
of keeping, such door or gate securely closed at all times when not in
actual use; however, the door of any dwelling occupied by human beings
which forms any part of the enclosure harem required need not be so
equipped. Required latching devices shall be located not less than 4
feet, 6 inches above the ground. The pool enclosure shall be in place
and approved by the Building Official before water is placed in the
pool.
x t
The provisions of this section shall not apply to public
swimming pools regulated by State Buildup Standards
approved by tlz State Building sta,wa„Fs Ommission.
93
Ordina:o No. 497
Page 15
2. Any fencing serving as an eolosm:e for a sari *n pool,
lawfully in existence on the date of adoption of this
ordinance, and meeting the requirements for fencing in
effect at the time of construction of the swi m+19 pool, may
be continued, however, any replacement of fencing in whole
or in part, shall comply with the requirements set fortis
above.
15.12.060 Table 23-r AmWded— Allausble Peflectia�. Table 23-0 of
said Uniform Building Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as
follows:
15 12.070 Table 2.F- U-R-10 Deleted. Table 25- U-R-10 of said Uniform
Building Qode is hereby deleted.
15.12.080 Section 2907(b) Ago)ded— Bearim Walls. Section 2907(b)
of said Uniform Building Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 2907(b). Bearing Walls. Bearing halls shall be Wnpported on
masonry or concrete feuudaticns or piles or other apprvved foundation
system which shall be of sufficient size to support all load. and
resist wind forces, Where a design is not provided, the minimum
foundation requirements for stud bearing walls shall be as set forth
in Table No. 29-A.
A one story wood or metal franks building not used for human
oo aq)an y and not over 40C square feet in floor areas may be
constructed without masonry or wncnete foundations if walls
are muq>ported by and anchored to a Portland emwnt oonctete
slab not lase than 3 1/2 inches in thickness.
The support of buildings by posts embadded in earth shall be
designed as specified in Section 2907(4). Wood posts on
poles embedded in earth shall be pressure treated with an
approved preservative. steel posts or poles shall be
protected as specified in Section 2908(1).
5'�
Ordinance No. 497
Page 16
15.12.090 Ficpse 29 -1 Amended — Building Setbacks from Slopes.
Figure 29 -1 is herby amended as sheen in the following figure:
�� or•- iu =.I_ -
•• _ _ _
Section 3204(d). Nonrated Roof Covering. A nonrated roof covering
shall be any mineral aggregate surface built -up roof for application
to roofs having a slope of not more than 3 inches in L? inches applied
as specified in Section 3208(b)4, consisting of not less than the
following:
1. Roofing Plies:
Three layers of felt; and
2. Surfacing Material:
300 pounds per roofing square of gravel of other approved
surfacing material, or 250 pnurls per roofing s0�v of
crushed slag.
15.12.1.10 Section 3204(e) DeleLed—Soecial Pumnase Roofs Section
3204(e) of said Uniform Building Cede is hereby deleted.
15.12.120 Section 3208 (b) 3 Aw ded— Asphalt Shingles. Sectim
1208(b)3 of said Uniform Building Oode is hereby amw ded to read as follews:
Sec'--ion 3208(b)3. Asphalt Shingles. Asphalt shingles shall omply
With UBC Standard No. 32-3 and shall have been tested and listed as
suitable for installation, as wind- resistant roof covering, at wind
velocity of not less than 90 mph. Asphalt shingles stall be installed
acoordieg to manufacturer's reeemuadatiors and Table No. 32 -B-1.
5S
OrdinMce No. 497
Page 17
15.12.130 Section 32tm onus mete T. a Section
3206 (b) 5 of said Uniform Buildup code is hereW amended to read as follows:
Section 3208(b)5. Clay or Qrrcete Tile. Tile of clay or ccrj=ete
shall amply with UBC Stardard No. 32 -12 mid shall be installed in
atxoordanoe with nerufacturer's ins nrtions and Table No.'s 32-D -1 and
32 -D-2.
15 L 150 Table No 32-13-1 Amended —shi 7 AM ' tim. Table No.
32 -8-1 of said Uniform Building 00de is herby ameided to read, in Words and
figures, as follows:
5(p
Cr inwrrn No. 497
Page 18
15.12.160 Table No. 32-6 -1 an] 32-P2 Amelded— Roofing Tile Anolica-
tion. Table No. 32-0-1 and 32-D -2 of said Untif= Building Code are hereby
amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:
J
CtdinanCe No. 497
Page 19
15.12.166 Section 3802 (h) Amendad - GYaam R Division 1
cies. Section 3802(h) of said Uniform Bli7Aim Code is amended to reed as
follows:
Section 3802 (h) Qroup R, Division 1 Ocoparcies. An automatic
sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every GYaup R, Division
1 0oca43anry as follows:
1. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout
apartment houses three or more stories in height or containing 16
or more dwelling units, in congregate residences three or more
stories in height and having an ooa:pant load of 50 or more and
in hotels three or more stories in height or containing 20 cr
more quest rooms. Residential or quick- response standard
sprinklers shall be used in the dwelling units and guest roam
portions of the building.
2. in all new Group R, Division 1 Oooupancies, other than those
specified in subsection (h) 1. above, the system shall he
installed in accordance with USO Standard 38 -3, '7Ystallation of
Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment houses, Hotels, and
OxWEgate Residences Less than 'Three Stories in Height.'$
51
Ordinance No. 497
Page 20
Section 3802 of said Uniform Building Cbcle is amended by adding sdbseCtlon (1),
(j) and (k) to read as follows:
Section 3802(i) Group R, Division 3, Oochpamies. An automatic fire
sprinkling system shall be installed in all new Group R, Division 3
occupancies. System design and installation shall be c=bacted in
accordance with DBC Standard 38-4, "Installation of Automatic Fire
Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Ioaging Mouses."
(j) Grasp M, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic fire sprinkling
system shall be installed in all new Group M, Division 1 Occupancies
constructed within 10 feet of a sprinklered residential oaat(x y on
the same property .
FJ(CfY1TC4I: GrVV M, Division 1 Occupancies exempt from permit
req irsmenta by Section 301(b) 1 of the Uniform Administrative
Code, as adapted.
such buildings attached to or accessory to residential buildings may
be supplied from the system serving the primary use, however, piping
and installation within the accessary partials shall be in aoamdarne
with UBC standard 38 -1.
(k) P4constructed Buildings. Any existing building of an occupancy
referred to in subsection (h), (i) or (j) of this Section, that is
hereafter damaged as a result of fire, earthquake on other disaster,
and which requires wibstantially complete demolition and reoahstzvo-
tiro, shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system as
specified in the pertinent subsection.
15.3-2.172 & -gtion 3803 Amended — sprinkler SVSt®n S=envisiol
Alarm. Section 3803 of said Uniform Building Code is amwxied to read as
follows:
Section 3803. Sprinkler System Supervision Alarms. All valves
controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and
water-flow switches an all sprinkler systems shall be electrically
supervised when the number of sprinklers ate:
(a) Twenty or more, in Gtnup I, Division 1 Omnpencies and ttonp R,
Division 1 Occupancies regulated by Section 3802(h)l.
(b) CYne hundred or more in a :U other occupancies.
Valve sngrsvision and water flaw alarms and trouble signals shall be
distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an
approved central station, remote station or proprietary supervising
station as defined by national standards or, when approved by the
building official with the cvnateno>a of the chief of the fire
department, sound an audible signal at a constantly attended location.
.•
Ordinance No. 697
Page 21
p Ma• w'
l ndergro nd key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided by the
municipality or public utility need not be supervised.
Deleted. Appendix Ctiapters 1,7,10,12,23,24,25,26,31,35,51 and 53 of
Uniform Building Code are nereby deleted.
15.12.180 App@rdiA Section 3210 AM91nd d =Rgov fie. Section 3210 of
the Appendix of the uniform Building axle is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 3210. Reroofing. New roof coverings for existing buildings
shall not be applied without first obtaining a permit therefor from
the Building official. An inspection may be required to determine the
acceptability of an existing structure for reroofing. A final
inspection and approval shall be obtained from the Building Official
when reroofing is completed.
rr �r��r.._.. :K • 4r: ,ngr!_�r.ee :_.:. a!�.' net..r• z
Section 7004. Hazardous Grading. Whenever the Building Official
determine that any existing natural elope, or any excavation,
embarkw nt, fill or other condition created by a grading project has
berxme a hazard to life or limb, cc endangers Property, or adversely
affects the safety, use or stability of a public way or drainage
charnel, the Building official may give the owner of the property upon
which the audition is lasted, or other person or agent in antral of
said pvoperty, a written notice to abate the condition. Upon receipt
of such written notice from the Building official, the owner or other
person or agent in control of said property shall within the period
specified in the notice repair or eliminate such natural slope,
excavation, embanI fill or other condition so as to eliminate the
hazard and be in conformance with the requirements of this node.
le.12.210 Appendix Seotioh 7005 ArHed— Definiticrts. Section 7005 of
the Appendix of the uniform Building code is hereby amended by adding the
following definitions:
1. Final Cdna Plan is a plan showing all detailed drainage
information, grade elevations, locations and floor elevations of
any buildings.
2. i8 a plan showing building pad
elevations, typical drainage methods to be utilized, and similar
generalized information, usually excluding finish floor
elevations, building locations, and specific drainage details.
RIM
ordinance No. 497
Page 22
15.12.220 Aooendix Sedti.on 7006 Amerx*ad —Plana and Specifications.
Section 7006 of the Appendix of said t7niibrm Building Lode is hereby amended to
read as follows:
Section 7006(a) Plans and Specifications. When required by the
Building Official, each application for a grading permit shall be
accurpanied by three sets of plans and specifications, and shfforting
data consisting of a soils engineering report and engineering geology
report. The plans and specifications shall be prepared and signed by
a civil engineer when required by the Building official.
(b) A grading permit may be issued based upon a preliminary grading
plan where insufficient precise detail of site improvement exists at
the time of grading permit issuance. Move grading is accomplished
based hgxn a preliminary grayling plan the submittal and approval of a
final grading plan shall be required prior to the issuance of any
building permit for the site.
Preliminary grading plans shall include sufficient detail to assure
that at the time of final grading plan Mft i.ttal, all standards and
specifications of this code and other city grading regulations will be
Mt.
(c) ,Information on Plans and in Specifications. Plan shall be drawn
to scale upon substantial paper or cloth and shall be of sufficient
clarity to indicate the nature and extent of the work proposed and
show in detail that it will conform to the provisions Of this Cale and
all relevant Jaws, ardinanoes, rules and regulations. Me first sheet
of each set of plans rhall give the location of the work and name and
address of the owners and the person by wham they were prepared. The
plans shall include the following information:
1. General vicinity of the proposed site.
2. Property limits and a¢mrate contours of existing ground and
details of terrain and area drainage.
3. Limiting dimentio s, elevations and finish contours to be
achieved by the grading.
4. Quantities of ewavation and fills.
5. Detailed plats of all surface and subsurface drainage
devices, walls, cribbing, dams and other protective devices
to be cc structei with, or as a part of, the proposed work
together with a map showing the drainage area and the
estimated runoff of the area served by any drains.
6. Location of any buildings or structures an the property
where the work is to be perfgrmcd and the location of array
buildings or structures on land of adjaom:t owners wthich are
within 15 feet of the project site cr which may be affected
by the proper grading operations.
bti
Ordinance No. 497
Page 23
7. Size, type and condition of vegetation that is to remain.
B. Legal restrictions such as property lines, easements,
setbacks, etc.
9. Utility stritu yes, catch basins, manholes, culverts, etc.
10. Drainage, sewer, water, gas, electric or other utility
lines.
ii. Any unusual site conditions.
12. Contours, both existing and proposed, shall be sown in
accordance with the following schedule:
Natural Slopes Maximum Interval
2 percent or less 2 feet
Over 2 percent to and 5 feet
including 9 percent
Over 9 percent 10 feet
13. Spw Lficatios containing information covering construction
and material requirements.
(d) Soils Engineering Report. The soils engineering report required
by snheertlop (c) shall include data regarding the nature, distribu-
tion and strength of existing soils, conclusions and recoemendatias
for grading procedures and design criteria for corrective measures
including buttress fills, when necessary, and opinions and recq®en-
datios covering adequacy for the intended use of sites to be
developed by the proposed grading as affected by soils engineering
factors, including the stability of slopes. Peccumerdatio s included
in the soils engineering repot and approved by the Wilding official
shall be incorporated into the grading plan or specifications.
(e) Engineering Geology Report. The engineering geology report
required by Subsection (a) shall include an adequate description of
the geology of the site, conclusions and recaumendations regarding the
effect of geologic conditions ah the proposed development, and
opinions aid recommendations covering the adequacy for the intended
use of sites to be developed by the proposed grading as affected by
geologimi factors. Recommendations included in the report and
approved by the building official shall be incorporated into the
grading plans or specifications.
(f) Issuance. The provisions of Section 303 Uniform Administrative
Code are applicable to grading permits. The Building Official may
also require submittal of the following additional information with
the permit application.
1. actennt and manner of cutting oY tress and clearing of
vegetation, disposal of same, aid measures for protection of
undisturbed trees and /or vegetation.
0
Ordinance No. 497
Page 24
2. A schedule defining staging and timing of cMWtnxticr. and
estimated extent of disturbance at strategic points durIM
construction.
3. Equipment, — thuds, and location of spoils disposal.
4. A plan defining the schedule, equipment, materials, and
personnel that will be Used to maintain all protective
devices and drainage facilities shown on the approved
grading per•
5. Designation of testes Upon which materials may be
transported and m3ans of access to the site.
6. The location and manner to be used for dispoeai of excavated
materials and control of emsim from such materials.
7. Recommendations as to the mitigation of ugitiv, dust and
dirt which may be offensive or injuricue to the neighbor-
hood, the general public or any portion thereof, including
due consideration, care, and respect for the property
rights, and protection of said neighbmtxmd or any portion
thereof.
8. T.imltatrmS on the area, extent and duration of time of
exposure of amprotected soil surfaces.
9. phasing of operations to minimize water non off Or other
environmental concerns.
10. Such additional applicable information as the Building
Official may require to c..y out the p>Lposes of this
oaiiykvm.
(g) Compliance with Plans and Code. The permittee or his agent,
shall carry out the proposed work in aocOrdenee with the approved
Plans and specifications and in compliance with all the requirement
of this Code.
(h) Protection of Adjacent Property. Dosing cpadirg operations, the
pexmittcae shall be responsible for the prevention of damage to
adjacent property and no person shall excavate on land sufficiently
close to the property lire to endanger any adjoining public street,
sidewalk, alley, or other public or private property without support -
uJ and protecting such property from settling, cracking, Or other
damage which might result.
M Tetporary erosion Control. The permittee shill put into effect
and maintain all precautionary measurzes necessary to protect adjacent
water msses and public Or private property from damage by erosion,
flooding, and deposition of mid or debris Originating fr-a the cite.
b4
Ordinance No. 497
Page 25
15 12 230 ArpenA_x Section 7007 and Tables 70-A and 70-B Deleted.
Section 7007 and Tables 70-A and 70-B are hereby deleted.
15.12.240 Appendix section 7008 Amended Bads. Section 7008 of the
P.ppend.ix of the Uniform Building Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 700B(a) Bads. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit
involving 5000 cubic yards or more of cut and fill, the applicant
shall first post with the Building Official, a bond to assure that the
work to be performed under the permit, if not mplated in accordance
with approved plans and specifications, will be corrected to eliminate
hazardous conditions. Such bond shall be examited by the owner as
principal and a corporate surety authorized to do business in
California.
In lien of a surety bad, the applicant may file a cash bad, or
deposit and assign to the City savings and loan oertificates w other
instruments of credit.
F3nere urnusual conditions or special hazards exist, the Building
Official may require a bad for grading involving less than 500o cubic
yards.
Tune bond required by this Section may include incidental off- ite
grading on property contiguous with the site to be developed pmAded
written consent of the canner of such contiguous property is filed with
the Building official. The Building official my waive the require-
ments for grad1n3 necessary to remove a geological hazard, where such
work is covered by an acmeanent and bond posted nmomnt to provisions
of other Ordinances.
(b) Amount of Boods. The amount of the bad shall be based upon the
mmber of cubic yards of material in both excavation and fill, plus
the cost of all drainage or Other protective devices, work necessary
to eliminate geological hazards, erasion control planting and required
retaining walls. 7bat portion of the bad based an volume of matsri +��
shall be ocaputed as set forth in the following schedule:
100,000 cubic yawls or less 50 percent of the cost of the
grading work
Over 100,000 cubic yards 50 percent of the cost of the first
100,000 cubic yards plus 25 percent
of the estimated cost of that
portion in excess of 100,000 cubic
yards
(c) Reduction in Bad. MM rough grading has been eaupleted in
conformance with the require r of this Code, the Building official
may at his discretion axeevnt to a proportionate reduction of the bond
to an amont estimated to be adequate to irhsae completion of the
work, rmainirhq to he performed. The costs referred to in this
Section shall be as approved try the Building Official.
(OS
Ordinance No. 497
Page 26
(d) Conditions. Every bard shall include the conditions that the
principal =hall:
1. Comply with all of the Provisions of City ordhOnC S,
applicable laws, and standards.
2. Comply with all of the :erns and conditions of the grading
permit.
3. Complete all of the work authorized by the permit within the
time limit specified in the permit or within any extension
thereof granted. No such extension of time shall release
the surety upon the bond.
(e) Term of Bond. The term of each bond shall begin upon the filing
thereof with the Building official and the band shall remain in effect
until the work authorized by the grading permit is completed and
approved by the Building official.
(f) Default Procedures. In the event the own or his agent shall
fail to comFlete the work or fail to comply with all terms and
conditions of the grading permit, it shall be deemed a default has
occurred. The Building Official shall give notice thereof to the
principal and surety on the grading permit bond, or to the adne' in
the case of a cash deposit or assignmEnt, and may craw the work
required to complete the grading in conformance with the requirements
of this Code be performed. The wrety emeartug the band shall
continue to be firmly bard order an obligation up to the full amount
of the bard, for the payment of all necessary costs and expenses that
may be inwrred by the Building official in causing any and all such
required work to be done. In the case of a cash deposit or assign-
ment, the unused portion of such deposit or funds assigned shall be
returned or reassigned to the person malting said deposit or assign-
ment.
(g) Right of Bhtry. In the event of default in the performance of
any term or condition of the permit, the Building Official arc the
surety, or any person Employed or engaged in the behalf of either,
shall have the right to enter upon the premises to perform necessary
corrective work or make inspections.
An Owner or any other Person who interferes with or obstructs the
ingress to or egress from any such premises, of any authorized
rvpresentative of the surety or of the City of Rancho ctxamoga
engaged in the correction or oompletian of the work for which a
grading permit has been issued, after a default has occurred in the
performance of the terns or conditions thereof, is guilty of a
misdemeanor.
15.12.250 Appendix Section 7010 Aasncied —.11@. Section 7010 of the
Appendix of the Uniform Building Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
(P N
Ordinance No. 497
Page 27
Section 7010(a) Fills. Unless otherwise recomwded in the approved
soils engineering report and approved by the Building Official, fills
shall conform to the provision of this Section and to Figure A,
TYpical Lot CYOSS- section for Fills.
17COEPFTON: The provisions of this section may be waived by the
Building Official for minor fills not intended to support
structures.
(b) Fill d.ocatic s. Fill slopes shall not be constructed on natural
810P° steeper than two horizontal to one vertical (2:1). Fill slopes
shall be located so as to toe out rct closer than 12 feet horizontally
from the top of a lower natural or cut slope nor closer than 12 feet
from a 2:1 slope influence line projected fnmi lower natural or cut
slope where that slope equals or is less than two horizontal to one
vertical (2:1) .
(c) Preparation of ntoud. The ground surface stall be prepared to
receive fill by removing vegetation, noomplyimg fill, t0prsoil and
other unsuitable materials, soarifYing to Provide a bond with the new
fill, and, where slopes are steeper than five to one, and the height
greater than 5 feet, by bendung into sound bedrock or other ornpetent
material as determined by the soils engineer. The bench under the toe
of a mill on a slope steeper than five to one Nall be at least 10
feet wide. The area bwYcd the toe of fill Nall be sloped for sheet
overflow or a paved drain Nall be provided. Ddnere fill is to be
placed over a cut, the bench under the toe of fill shall be at least
10 feet wide but the cut must be made before placing fill and approved
by the soils engineer and /or engineering geologist as a suitable
foundation for fill.
�1
Ordinance No. 497
Page 28
(d) Fill Material. Detrimental amanit of organic material shall not
be permitted in fills. No rock or similar irreducible material with a
maximum dimension greater than 12 inches shall be busied or placed in
fills.
EXCEPTION; The Buildup Official ray permit placement of larger
crock when the soils engineer properly devises a method of place
ment, continuously inspects its placanent and approves the fill
stability. The following conditions shall also apply:
1. Prior to iss0anoe of the Gradirp permit, potential rock
disposal areas shall be delineated on the grading plan.
2. Rock sizes greater than 24 it d in maximum dh siou shall
be 10 feet or more below grade measured vertically.
3. Roches shall be placed so as to assure filling of all wids
with well graded soil.
(e) Ompaction. All fills, includirg badcfill in utility tte xhee,
shall be coupac.ed to a minim= of 90 percent of maxim= density.
Y Mp• 1'
1. Fills a elsewhere in this crdinanoe and wt the
Building Official determines that compaction is not a
necessary safety measure to aid in proventirg saturation,
,settlement, slipping, or erosion of the fill.
t0nere lower density and expansive types of soil exist,
permission for lesser compaction may be granted by the
Building Official upon showing of good cause under the
auditions provided herein.
3. Alternate methods of filling and compaction may be utilized
on utility trercims or other specific projects when
rexzumerded by the soils engiroer and approved by the
Building Official.
(f) Slope. The slope of fill surfaces shall be no steeper than is
safe for the intended use. Fill slopes shall be no steeper Ulan two
horizontal to one vertical.
(g) Drainage :,nd Terracing. Drainage and terracing shall be provided
zed the area above fill slopes and the surfaces of terraces shall be
graced and paved as required by Section 7012.
15-12.260 Section 7013 AamxW— Erasion gent m Section 70i: of
the Appendix of the Uniform Building Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
motion 7013(a) Erosion CUntrols. The faces of art and fill slopes
Shall be prepared and maintained to control against erosion. The
protection for the slopes shall be installed as soon as practical and
prior to call rg for final approval.
.:
or dinmace No. 497
Page 29
(b) Other Devices. Where necessary, check dams, cribbing, riprap o
other devices or methods shall be Toyed to control erosion and
provide safety.
(c) Planting. The surface of all Cut and fill slopes more than 5
feet in height shall be protected against damage from erosion by
Planting with approved crass cr ground cover plants. Plants and
Planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic
conditions of the site.
t m• •F
1. Planting need not be provided for ant slopes rocky in
character and not subject to damage by erosion, wish
approved by the Building official.
2. Slopes may be protected against erosion damage by other
methods when such methods have been specifically rectoffiidei
by a soils engineer, engineering geologist, or equivalent,
and found to offer erosion protection equal to that provided
by the Planting specified in this section.
(d) Irrigation. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with
an approved system of irrigation designed to cover all portion of the
slope, and plans therefore shall be subutted and approved prior to
installation. A functional test of the system may also be required.
EKCFPMON: Requi.ob..ts for installation of a permanent
irrigation system may be modified upon specific re000medatioh of
a landscape architect on equivalent authority that, because of
the type of plants selected, the Planting methods used and the
soil and climatic o rditiore at the site, such irrigation system
will not be necessary for the maintenance of the slope Planting.
(e) Release of Bond. The planting and irrigation systems required by
this Section shall be installed as soon as practical after rough
grading. Prior to final approval of grading and before the release of
theme slopes.
bond, Plantings shall be well established and growing on
SECTION 6: Chapter 15.14 is hereby added to Title 15 of the Rancho
Cucam Nunicigaal Code, adapted pry Ordinance 412, of the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, to read in words and figures as follows:
CRhPTM 15.14
Mforam 09ilding once
�1Q171;:
15.14.010 Uniform Building Code Standard 38 -3 Amended - Adoption
of NFPA 13R Standard by Rafe-ecet
15.14.020 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope
15.14.030 Section 2 -1.3 Amended - Anepection and Testing
0
- -- ow-
Ordinance No. 497
Page 30
M ■ ■
15.14. 040
Section 2 -4.2 Amended - Fire Department Oennec:tias
15.14.050
Section 2 -4.6 Amended - Alarms
15.14.060
Section 2-6 Amended - IOCaticn of Sprinklers
15.14.070
Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4 Added - Adoption
of NFPA 13D Standard by Reference
15.14.080
Section 1.1 Amended - Scope
15.14.090
Section 1 -5.1.2 Amended - Listed and Approved
15.14.100
Section 1 -5.1.4 Amended - Testing and Inspection
15.14.110
Section 3 -1.1 Amended Valves and Drains
15,14.120
Section 3-6 Amended - Alarms
15.14.130
Section 3 -7 Added - Fire Departmelnt kr Ectl on
15.14.140
Section 4-6 Amended - Iomtron of Sprinklers
St-rr_3-yrNC, are hereby amended by adoption of NFPA 13R Standard, 1989 Edition,
published by the National Fire Protection Association, Inc. Said NFPA 13R
Standard stall be herein referenced as Uniform Building code Standard 38 -3,
"Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels,
Convents and Monasteries Iris Than Three Stories in Height" and shall be
utilized in design and installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems
required by Section 3802(h) 2. of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by this
ordinance, except as further awarded by Sections 15.14.020 through 15.14.060
following.
Sectign s 5 r 4 020 Section 1.1 Ameded - Section 1 -1 of said
Uniform building Cole Standard 38 -3 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 1.1 Scope. This standard stall be used in design and
installation of automatic sprinkler systems installed in residential
o 4Ancies less than three stories in height, not withstanding any
conflicting story - height referenced d herein.
Section 2-1.3 Ot said UnIfOrM .. •.r a ..a ;w rase •:r , n!. 4- =-n TO-2
•. _
r,ead as; follows:
Section 2 -1.3 (a) Inspection and pasting. All supply piping shall be
hyrhrostatically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard. All
system stall be flow tested in accordance with Pamgno Cucamonga Fire
District Standards.
(b) Inspection shall be requested by the Permittee at stages of
oonstnnctim as outlined below:
1. When dudenyannd piping is complete but prior to concealment
of any portion thereof and prior to connection to the
overhead piping riser. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be
in place, the system flushed and piping pressurized for
inspection.
Nhen all overhead piping, fittings ar.9 riser are installed
but prior to concealment of any portion thereof. Hydro-
static test gauge(s) are to he in place and the overhead
system pressurized for irspection.
Ordinance No. 497
Page 31
When piping has been annealed and all sprinkler heads,
alarm bell (s), flow and tamgaet valves and monitoring devices
installed and/or connected. Testing of associated devices,
is. alarms, flow and tamper valves and monitoring systems is
to be conducted at this time.
Section 15.14.040 Section 2 -4.2 Amended - Fire Devartmeit
Connection. At least 1 1/2 inch or ape, 2 1/2 inch fire department connection
shall be provided U*z the sprinkler system has 20 sprinklers or more. Fire
departent connections shall be located in accordance with Rancho Oacamonga
Fire Protection District standards.
Section 15.14.050 Section 2-4,6 Amended - Alarms. Section 2-
4.6 of said Uniform Building Code Standard is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Section 2 -4.6 Alarms. All water flow alarms shall be monitored by an
approved aural station in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District standards.
Section 15 14 060 Section 2-6 Amended - Iocation of Snrinnklers.
Section 2-6 of said Uniform Building Code Standard 38 -3 is hereby amended as
follows:
Section 2-6 location of Sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be installed in
all areas.
IXCRMONS:
Sprinklers may be omitted from bathroom not exceeding 55
square feet in area with non-combustible plumbing fixtures.
2. Sprinklers may be omitted from smell clothes closets where
the least horizontal dimension does not exceed 3 feet and
the floor area does not exceed 24 square feet and the walls
and ceiling are surfdced with material of class I flame -
spread classification, as defined in Chapter 42 of the
Uniform Building Code.
3. 6prirnklets may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces and
other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for
living purposes or storage.
Standards are hereby amended by adoption of NFPA 13D Standard, 1189 Edition
Published by the National Fire Protection Association, Inc. Said NFPA 13D
Standard shall be herein referenced as Uniform Building Cade Standard 38-4,
"Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Icldging
Nurses," and shall be utilized in design and installation of automatic fire
sprinkler systems required by Section 3802(1) and (j) of the uniform Building
Code as adopted by thin ordinance, except as further amended by Sections
15.14.080 through 15.14.140 following.
■u
Ordinance No. 497
Page 32
Seatim 15.14.0$0 Section 1.1 Amaded - 540p2. Section 1.1 of said
Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 1.1 Scope. This standard shall be used in the design and
installation of aubomtic sprinkler systems installed in dwellings and
lodging houses and in certain accessory buildings, not withstanding
any references herein to mobil homes.
Devi - Section 1-5.1.2 Of said Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4 is hereby
amended to read as follads:
Section 1- 5.1.2. I.istod and Approved Devices. Only listed or
approved devices and materials shall be used in aut=atic fire
sprinkler systems.
} M }• �
Listing may be waived for tanks, pumps and for support devices as
permitted by Section 3-4.1. Use of unlisted devices shall be
approved by the Building Official with the ccncurrenoe of the
Fire Qiief.
�K_•I et X9..!1 1a 6!.. .I��S4 •1 •!•
Section 1-5.4.(a) Inspection and Testing. All systems shall be
hYdm&atically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard. All
systems shall be flaw- tested in accordance with Rancho casamonga Fire
Pruta:cioh District standards.
(b) Inspectiore shall be requested by the permitteee at stages of
construction as outlined below:
When piping is complete but prior to concealment
of any portion thereof and prior to ezrmectim to the
overhead piping riser. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be
in place, the system flushed and Piping pressurized for
inspection-
When all overbhe piping, fittings and riser are installer)
but prior to wrcealment of any potion thereof. Hydro-
static teat gauge(s) are to be in place and the overhead
system pressurized for inspection.
When Piping has been concealed and all sprinkler heads,
alarm bell(s), flow and tamper valves and mcnitering devices
.installed and/or oa nrected. Testing of associated devices,
ie. alarms, flow and tamper valves and monitoring eyst®s is
to be conducted at this time.
12
finance No. 497
Page 33
Section 15.14.110 Section 3 -1.1 PIIPe - Valye6 and Drains.
Section 3 -1.1 of said Uniform Building Code -- ardafd 38 -4 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
Section 3 -1.1 Valves and Dram. Each System shall have a single
control valve arranged to shut off both the domestic and sprinkler
systems, and a separate stmt -off for the domestic system only.
EXCZ'PFICNS:
I. The sprinkler system piping may ha�v a separate control
valve where supervised by one of the following methods;
a. Central station, proprietary or rice station alarm
system.
b. Incal alarm service that will cause the sanding of an
audible signal at a conatantly attended point.
2. A separate Shut-off valve is not required for the domestic
water supply in multipurpose piping systems.
SK .•J! a .��. •1 Po11.� i..TN
LINO
Section 3-6 Al arms. local waterflow alarm(s) shall be provided on
all systems. 11he waterflw alum or alarms shall be located on (an)
exterior wall(s), w such other location(s) as approved by the
Building Official with the concurrence of the Fire chief, and so
located as to be audible throughout the building.
Section 15 14 130 section 3 -7 Added Fnre'_Qepa� oxm tie.
Chapter 3 of said Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4 is hereby amended by
addition of section 3 -7 to read as follows:
Section 3 -7 Fire Depacbwnc connection. All R-3 occupancies eXceed-
ing 5000 square feet in floor area shall be provided with an approved
fire department connection installed in accordance with Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards.
Section 15.14.140 Section 4-6 Amaded - location of Scrirkiers.
Section 4-6 of said uniform Building code standard 38-4 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
section 4-6 location of Sprinklers. sprinklers shall be installed in
all areas.
1. Sprinklers may be amitted from bathrooms not exceeding 55
square feet in flocs area with non-combustible plumbing
fixtures.
�3
Ordinance No. 497
Page 34
2. Sprinklers may be mittsi from small closets wdrre the least
horizontal dimension does not exceed 3 feet and the floor
area does not exceed 24 square feet and the walls and
ceiling are surfaced with materials of Class I flame spread
classification as defined in Chapter 42 of the Uniform
Building node.
3. Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, yawl spaces and
other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for
living purposes or storage.
4. Sprinklers may be omitted from entrance foyers that are not
the only means of egress.
SWrICN 7: chapter 15.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mmicipal Code is
hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:
15.16.010 Chapters 1, 2, 3 Deleted.
15.16.010 Qiavtera 1. 2 and 3 Deleted. Chapters 1, 2, and 3 of said
Uniform Mechanical Cade, 1988 tdition are hereby deleted.
,91MLON 8: ChapOx- 15.20 of the Rancho Cahcmuorga Mmicipal Code is
hereby amended to real, in words and figures, as follows:
15.20.010 Part I Deleted— Aftiniuhration
15.20.020 Section 1004(a) Amended—materials
15.20.030 Appendix Section D1(b) Deleted
15.20.040 Appendix Section D3.4 Deleted
15 20 010 Part I colored. Part I of said Ihuform Plumbing Code,
1988 Bditicn, entitled -Administration- is hereby deleted in its entirety.
15.20.020 Section 1004 fat &meDjgd =Batgriallss. Section 1004(a) of
said Uniform Plumbing Code is hereby amended to real as follows:
Section 1004(a) Materials. Water pipe and fittings shall be of
brass, copper, cast iron, galvanized malleable iron, galvanized
wrought iron, galvanized steel, lead or other approved materials.
14
Ordinance No. 497
Page 35
Asbestcs-Oament, PE, or PVC water pipe manufacbmmd to recognized
standards may be used for cold water distribution systems outside a
building. All materials used in the ureter supply system, eoept
valves and similar devices, shall be of a like material, except when
otherwise approved by the Administrative Authority.
15.20.030 APOerrlix Section DIN Deleted. Section D1(b) of
Appendix D of said Uniform Plumbing Code is hereby deleted.
15 20 040 Appendix Section D3.4 Deleted. Section D3.4 of Appendix D
of said Uniform Plumbing Code is hereby deleted.
SBMCN 9: Chapter 15.28 of the Rarrho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read, in Words and figures, as follows:
aL
CODE FUR AEATRaM OF
sections:
15.28.010
Section 103
Deleted
15.28.020
Section 201(c) Deleted
15.28.030
Section 203
Deleted
15.28.040
Section 205
Ana ded —Board of Appeals
15.28.050
Section 206
Added ---%= a y Abatement
15.28.060
Suction 801
Amended — Demolition Procedure
15.28.070
Section 802
Deleted
15.28.080
Section 901
Amended —E> IrCxMx d by City in
Repair or Demolition
15.28.090
Section 902
Amended—Council Idnling
15.28.100
Section 903
Amended— Objections.
15.28.110
Section 904
Amended— Passage.
15.28.010 SBCtiOn 103 Deleted. Section 103 of said Uniform Code for
Abatement of Daryerous Buildings is hereby deleted.
15.28.020 Section 201 ( ) Deleted. Subsection (c) of Section 201 of
said Uniform Code for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings is hereby deleted.
15.28.030 Sect ion 203 Deleted. Section 203 of the Uniform Code for
the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings is hereby deleted.
15.28.040 Section 205 Amended —Board offs. section 205 of the
Uniform Code for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings is amended to read as
follows:
Section 205 Board of Appeals. "Board of Appeals" as used herein
shall mean the Board of Appeals as set forth in Section eW or the
Uniform Administrative code as adopted in this Title.
Appeals to the board shall be processed in accordance with the
provisions curtained in Section 501 of this code.
-15,
oriinancn No. 497
Page 36
15.28.050 sections 206 upped —meaty , The Uniform Code
for Abatement of Dangerouus Buildings is amend°d by AMirq Sections 206 and 207
to rears as follows:
Section 206(a) summary abatement. In addition to the procedures
provided for abatement of dangerous buildings as set forth in Chapter
4 of this Code, the Building official is hereby given summary power to
satire from entry any sUl ct re on premises which in his discretion he
determines to be imwAiately dangerous, or immediately hazardocs or in
other manner injurious to public health or safety. Such structures
MY be seared by the Building Official by nailing of boards over the
doors and windows of such structure, however, he shall not be limited
to only this method and may use other methods at his discretion to
acomplish the same purpose which may be more appropriate under the
cn-mstsnoes. ?he Building Official shall also past a sign stating
Lh effect "SOS BX=W, DO Nor HUM ": or other appropriate
sign upon the structure or poises in at least one conspicuous
Place. The Building official shall immediately upon such action send
notice to the owners of the real property upon which the structure or
condition is located, w shown on the last equalized asses htt
rolls. Such notice shall curtain the following information:
1. That he has secured the strwtu re or corrected the hazardous
conditions.
2. The cost incurred by the City thereby.
3. That he has posted signs as provided by this section.
4. The reasons why he has taken the action.
5. That an appeal may be made within 10 days to the City Council, as
provided in this Section.
b. That if his action is not arwulled by the City Cunahcil, the cost
Of securing the property shall bade a lien upon the real
property, unless the cost is paid to the City within 30 days of
the mailing of the notice. If any owner of property, or any
person having any interest in property affected by the action of
the Building official in searing a stry tune or abating a
hazardous condition as permitted by this section, is aggrieved by
the action of the Building official in searing the structure,
such person or persons may appeal the action of the Building
Official by filing a written notice of appeal with the City clerk
within 10 days after receipt of notice of the action by the
Building official. The notice of appeal must be verified under
penalty of perjury and must state the grounds upon which the
action of the Building official is appealed. The City Council
shall, uhpon receiving such notice of appeal, hear any evidence
W other relevant mutters presented by the appellant or the
Building Official at its Wert regular meeting after the filing of
the notice of appeal, provided however, if the notice of appeal
is filed less than ten days prior to the day of a regular meeting
of the City Comhcii, the hearing stall not be held at the first
regular meeting, but at the following regular meeting.
-1�
Ordinance No. 497
Page 37
After hearing all evidence and other relevant matters presented
at said hearing, ar without hearing if no appeal is m-'^ upon the
report of the Building official, the City Council my than
confirm, anerd, or annul the action of the Building Official. If
the action of the Building official is ahnulled, the City, at its
own expense, shall remove any and all instnmpnts used to secure
said structure, and shall remove any and all signs stating that
the building is unsafe to enter.
If, however, the city Council oonfirms the action of the Building
Official in searing the structure at the hearing on appeal, ar,
if no appeal is taken, at any other regular meeting, or adjourned
meeting, them the cost interred by the City in searing the
stnacGre shall bno> a lien against the property, and a resolu-
tion of the City Council confirming the action of the Building
Official, including the igwsition of a lien upon the property
upon which the structure is located to pay for the cost of
searing it, may be adopted upon receipt of a report from the
Building official. Shah resolution may be filed with the San
ia-nkm- ino County Tax Assessor, and the lien inposed thereby my
be collected for the City by him, along with the next annual tax
levy and assess on said property.
(b) The same procedure, as provided in sulrec non (a) for abating
through securing from entry any structure which is determined by the
Building Official to be immediately dangerous w immediately hazardous
may also be used by the Building Official in corvecti n with the
smmmry abatement of all other dangerous or hazardous conditions upon
private property which the Building Official determines, at his
discretion, as constituting an imnui;ately dangerous r haz rd,,,
condition.
The Building official may then summarily abate such nuisance, at his
discretion, in the most appropriate manner under the c=msttanoes,
which may include, but shall not be limited to the following methods:
fencug, draining water from swimming pools and filling with appro-
priate ballast, raoovinxg fire hazards, filling or covering open holes
and grading or strengthening land fills or ewcavatias. Although the
manner and method used by the Building official shall be at his
discretion, he shall, in making his determination, seek the most
economical method and endeavor not to place an unhrlue eccr mical
hardship h>par the owner of the property, and only use those measures
which will eliminate the dan gee and hazesdous features.
15..28.960 Section 801 Amended — Derolition procedure. Section 801
of the Uniform Code for Abatement of Dangerous Pnildings is hereby amended to
read as follows:
section 801. procedure. When any work of repair or demolition is to
be done pursuant to Section 701(0) 3 of this Code, the Building
Official shall issue the order therefore and the work shall be
aeanplished by City personnel or by private contract under the
direction of the Building Official, or he may empla} such
11
Ordinance No. 497
Page 38
architectural and engineering assistance on a contract basis as he may
deem reasonably neoessary. If any part of the work is to be
aeomplished by private contract, standard public works contractual
procedures shall be followed.
15.28.070 Section 802 Deleted. The Uniform Oocle for Abatement of
Dangerous Buildings is hereby amended by deleting Section 802 in its entirety.
I. SBMIM 901 of the Uniform Code+ for the
hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 901. MpenseS Incurred by City it Repair cr Deiniition.
The Building Official shall keep an itemized account of the
ehpese incurred by the City in the repair or demolition of any
building done pursuant to the provisions of Section 701 (c) 3 of
this Code. Upon the empletio n of the work of repair cr demoli-
tion, the Building Official shall prepare and file with the City
Clerk a report specifying the work done, the itemized and total
cost of the work, a description of the real property upon which
the building or structure is or was located, and the names and
addresses of the persons entitled to notice pursuant to %%-
section (c) of Section 401.
15 28 090 motion 902 ArAmdPd=om=i1 hT 7' Section 902 of the
Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous; Buildings is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Section 902. Council Riling. Upon receipt of said report, the City
Clerk shall present it to the City Council for consideration. Toe
City Council shall fix a time, date and place for hearing such report,
and any protests or objections thereto, The City Clerk shall cause
notice of said hearing to be posted upon the property involved and
served by certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the carer of
the property as his name and address appears m the last equalized
assessuent roll of the oaa'cty, if such so appears, or is known to the
Clerk. such notice shall be given at least 10 days prior to the date
set for hearing and shall specify the day, hoes, and place when the
Council will hear and pass dpcl the Building Official's report,
together with any objections or protest which may be filed as
hereinafter provided by any person interested in or affected by the
proposed charges.
15.28.100 Section 903 Amended - Objections. Section 903 of the
Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Section 903. Objections. Any person interested in or affected by the
Proposed charges may file written protests or objections with the City
Clerk at any time Prior to the time set for the hearing on the report
of the Building Official. Each such protest or objection must contain
a description Of the property in which the signer thereof is
interested and the grounds of such Protest or objection. Toe city
IN
Ordinance No. 497
PaW 39
clerk shall en4:rse on every such protest or objection the date it was
received. The protests or objections shall be presented to the City
Council at the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or
objections shall be considered.
15 28 110 Section 904 Amended pa . Section 904 of the Uniform
Code for the Abatement of Dargeroos Buildings is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Section 904. Passage. L" t110 may a.hd has fixed for the hearing,
Uhe City Couci.l shall hear and pass upon the report of the Building
Official together with any such objections or protests. The CUtmcil
may make shdh revision, asrection or modification in the report or
the charge as it may doom just: and when the Council is satisfied with
the correctness of the charge, the report (as submitted or as revised,
eorrec* -I or modified) together with t1:e charges shall be confirmed or
neie =Ted. The decision of the City Council on the report and the
chugs, and on all Protests or objections, shall be final and
conclusive.
SWTICN 10: Chapter 15.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga 19micipal Code is
amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:
k; W4n1
II .y III a
15.32.010 Section 104 Deleted
15.32.020 Section 201 Subsection (a) and (b) Deleted
15.32.030 Section 203 Amended — Rousing Advisory and Appeals
Board
15.32.040 Section 204 Deleted
15 32 010 Section 104 Deleted. Section 104 of said Uniform Housing
Code is hereby deleted.
15_32.020 Section 201. pjbs ytion fat and (b) Deleted. Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 201 of said Uniform Housing Code are hereby deleted.
15 32 030 $i�-tion 03 Aacsded Advisory rhd AMMIS
Section 203 of said Uniform Hcusing Code is hereby amnded to read as follows:
Section 203. Housing Advisory and Appeals Board. "Housing Advisory
and Appeals BoardH as used herein shall mean the Board of Appeals as
set forth in Section 204 of the Chlfcrm AdM stMtive Oode hereby
adopted. Appeals to the Board shall be processed in aarordance with
the provisions contained in Section 1201 of this code.
15 32 040 Section 204 Delet�i. Section 204 of the Uniform Housing
Code is hereby deleted.
1
nr-n No. 497
Page 40
SDCPICN 11: Chapter 15.36 of the Rani» Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to road, in words and figures, as follows:
Qua 15.36
Sections:
15.36.010 Section 103 Deleted
15.36.020 Section 303 Deleted
15.36.030 Section 304 Amended — Fees
15.36.040 ChapterS 5 thraxgh 12 and Chapter 14 Deleted
15.36.010 Section 103 Deleted. Said Uniform Sign ode is amended by
deleting Section 103 in its entirety.
15,36-020 Section 303 Deleted. Section 303 of said Uniform Sign
Cede is hereby deleted in its entirety.
15.36.030 Section 304 Amended — Fees. Section 304 of said Uniform
Sign Code is hereby Amended to read as follows:
Section 304. Fees. Fees for sign permits and plan checking shall be
calculated as set forth in Section 304 of the Uniform Administrative
axis as herein adopted and amended in this Title.
FEcbEh_U =i. Ti�S'�.�7is_.ei
INk
SE MON 12: Chapter 15.40 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:
15.40.010
Section 4101 Amerced — Purpose
15.40.020
Section 4102 Amended — Application
15.40.030
section 4106 Ama ded — Doors and Hardware
15.40.040
Section 4107 Amended — Sliding Doors
15.40.050
Section 4106 Amended — Windows
15.40.060
Section 4109 Amended — Garage Vehicular Access Doors
15.40.070
Section 4110 throhx)ih 4115 Prided — Multiple Family
Develapments
Section 15.40.010 Section 4101 Amended — Blip, Section 4101 of
said Uniform Building Security Code is amended to read as follows:
io
Ordinance No. 497
Page 41
Section 4101. purpose. The purpose of this code is to establish
minimum standards to make newly constructed dwelling units and
additions to dwelling units, and private garages resistant to unlawful
entry and to facilitate protection of property.
giaction 15 40 020 cedt Cn 4102 Amended Amlicat�. Section 4102
of said Uniform Building Security Code is amended to read as follows:
Section 4102. Application. the provisions of this chapter shall
apply to openings into dwelling units of (carp R, Division 1
Occupancies, Group R, Division 3 Occupancies and into garages of Grop
M-1 Occupancies, as defined in the uniform Building Code, including
openings between attached garages and dwelling units.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. An opening in an exterior wall when all portions of such
opening is more than 12 feet vertically or 6 feet
horizontally from an accessible surface of any adjoining
yard, cart, passageway, public gray, breezeway, patio,
planter, porch or similar area.
2. An opening it an exterior well when all potties of such
opening is more than 12 feet vertically or 6 feet
horizontally from the surface of any adjoining roof,
balcony, larding, stair tread, platform or similar stn�
or when every portion of such surface is itself more than 12
feet above an accessible surface.
3. Any opening in a roof when all portions of such roof are
more than 12 feet above an accessible surface.
4. Openings where the smaller dimension is 6 inches or less,
provided that the closest edge of such openings is at least
36 inches from the locking device of the door or window
assembly.
5. Openings protected by required fire door assemblies having a
fire enrhurance rating of not less than 45 mimrtna,
15.40.030 Section 4106 Amended — Doors and Hardware. Section 4106
of the Uniform Building Security Code is amended to read as follows:
Section 4106 (a) Doors and biardware. Swinging pedestrian dears and
their hardware regulated by this chapter shall comply with Lac
Standard No. 41 -1, Part I or equivalent standard. Does and hardware
stall be installed as tested.
EXCEMCN: Doors and hardware fabricated and installed as set
forth in Subsections (b) through (i) below.
(b) Door eostruction. ;uch doors shall be of solid construction
with a minimum thickness of ow. and 1 3/4 inches except for recessed
panels which may be not less than 9116 inches thicatess.
Ordinance No. 497
Page 42
(c) lxxld g devices. Such dotes shall be equipped with a double or
single cylinder deadbolt lock. The bolt shall have a minimum
projection of 1 inch and be constructed so as to repel cutting tool
attack. Me deadbolt shall have an embedment of at least 3/4 inch
into the strike receiving the projected bolt. 72he cylinder shall have
a cylinder guard, a inim,m of 5 pin tumblers, and shall be connected
to the inner portion of the lock by connecting screws of at least 1/4
inch in diameter. A dual looking mechanism constructed so that both
deadbolt and latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside
door knob, or lever, may be substituted provided it meets all other
specifications for locking devices.
(d) Inactive leaves. Inactive leaves of double docra shall be
equipped with metal flush bolts at top and bottom having a minimum
cross- sectional dimension of 1/2 inch and a minimum embedment of 5/8
incises into the Mad and threshold of the frame.
(e) Blocking. in wood framing, horizontal blocking shall be placed
betwe l studs at door lock height for 3 stud spaces each side of the
door openings. Any spaces between jambs and trimmers and adjoining
stud- shall be sbdnr d solid.
(f) Stops. Door stops qr wooden jambs for inr- sw)uging doors shall be
of one piece construction with the jamb. Jambs for all coots stall be
constructed or protected so as to prevent violation of the strike.
(g) Glazing. Glazing in exterior doors and other glazed openings
within 36 inches of any locking mechanism shall be of fully tetpereC
glass or bcaglary resistant glazing, except when double cylirdea
dolt locks are installed.
(h) strike plate installation. In wood -frame construction, an open
space between trim -mrs and wood doorjambs stall be solid ebbtmid by a
single piece eaten Ling not less than 12 inches above the strike plate.
strike plates shall be attached to wood with not less than four No. 8
by 3 inch strews, which shall have a minimum of 3/4 inch penetration
into the nearest stud. Strike plates when attached to metal stall be
attached with not less than far No. a machine screws.
All strike plates of doors in pairs whall be installed as tested.
(i) Hinges. Mien hinges are exposed to the exterior, at least one of
the three required hinges shall be equipped with nose movable hinge
pins or a mechanical interlock to preclude removal of the door from
the exterior by remorving the hinge pins. Not less than three 4 1/2
inch steel butt hiuxles shall be symmetrically fastened to both the
door and frame with not less than four No. 9 3/4 inch wood screws or
to metal with not less than far' No. a matnim strews.
in wood construction, an open space between trimmers and wood door
jambs shall be solid shimmed extending not less than 6 inches above
and below the plate.
rAMN
low
Ordinance No. 497
Page 43
15.40.040 Section 4107 Amended — SlidiTq doors. Section 4107 of
the Uniform Building Standard Code is amended to read as follows:
Section 4107. Sliding doors. Sliding Door assemblies regulated by
this chapter shall amply with USC Standard 41 -1, Part II or
equivalent standard.
15124.050 Section 4108 Amended — Windows. Section 4108 of the
Uniform Building Security erode is amended to read as follows:
Section 4108. windows. Window assemblies which are designed to be
operable and which are regulated by this Chapter shall amply with USC
Standard 41 -2 unless such windows are protected by approved metal
bars, screen, or grilles. See also Uniform Building CUde Section
1204.
15.40.060 Section 4109 Amended — Conoco Vehiculaz Access Doors.
Section 41C9 of the Uniform Building Security Code is amended to read as
follows:
Section 4109(a) Garage vehicular access doors. Rolling overhead,
solid overhead, swinging /sliding or acoordior doors provided for
vehicular aoce s to private garages shall be constructed and installed
as set forth in this section.
(b) such doors shall be provided with an exterior covering of one of
the following:
1. 5cteriac grade plywood not less than 5116 hxtn s in
thickness.
2. AlUninmm not lass than feu^- hunlreths of an inch (.04 ") in
thickness.
3. Steel not less than three-hundredths of an inch (.03 ") in
thickness.
4. Fiberglass having a density of not less than 5 ounces per
Sgua.e foot.
5. Wood siding not less than 9/16 of an inch in thickness.
(c) Locking devices. All locking devices utilizing a cylinder lock
shall have a minimun 5 pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or
bolt extending into the receiving guide a minim= of 1 inch. Slide
bolt type locking assemblies shall have a bolt diameter of not less
than 3/8 inch. Slide bolts shall penetrate the receiving guide not
less than 1 1/2 inches and shall be attached with 3 bolts that are not
cez -able from flow rA&.% ,ie. Rivets shall not be used to attach slide
bolt assemblies.
Doors exceeding 16 feet in width shall be provided with opposite,
centrally located locking points, either at each side or at top and
bottom of the door. 1
J
Ordinance No. 497
Page 44
`T.�
1. For doors 19 feet or leas in width, a single locking point
may be used if centrally located at the floor or top of the
door.
(d) Frames. Frames for garage vehicle access doors shall be
constructed of one of the following:
1. Aluminum not less than twelve- hunlredths of an inch (.12 ")
in thickness.
2. Steel not less than six- hundredths of an inch (.06 ") in
thickness.
3. Wood not less than 1 1/2 inches in thidmess.
4110 thrvuc h 4115 to read as follows:
Section 4110. Oomplex diagram. There shall be positioned at each
entrance of a multiple- family devalcpoent, an illuminated diagrammatic
representation of the complex which shows the location of the viewer
and the emit designations and locations within the complex.
Section 4111. Lighting. Lighting in multiple - family dwellings shall
be as follows:
Aisles, passageways and recesses related to and within the building
complex shall be illuminated with an intensity of at least twenty -five
aye- h�urherlths (.25) fcotcandles at the ground level during the moss
of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by vandal- resistant
Covers.
Open parking lots and carports shall be provided with a minimum of 1
footcandle of light on the parking surface during the hours of
darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by vandal resistant
covers.
Section 4112. Keying. Upon occupancy, each dwelling unit in a
subdivision or multiple- family development shall have locks using keys
that are not interchangeable with any other dwelling unit in the
subdivision or multiple- family development.
Section 4113. Definitions.
1. "aurglary Resistant Glazing" means those materials as
defined in [hdeswriters laboratory Bulletin 972.
'?Lk
ordinance No. 497
Page 45
2. "Double Cylinder Deadbolt" mans a deadbolt lock which can
be activated Only by key on both the interior and the
exteriar sides.
3. "Door Stop" means the projection along the top and sides of
a door jamb which checks the doar1s swinging action.
4. "Dwelling" means a building ar portion thereof designed
exclusively for resident;an mangy, including single -
family dwellings.
5. "Flushbolt" is a manual, key ar turn operated metal bolt
nnormlly used on inactive door(s) and is attached to the top
and bottom of the door we engages in the head and threshold
Of the frame.
6. "Single Cylinder Deadbolt" means a deadbolt loch which is
activated fxad the outside by a key and fr the inside by a
knob, thumirtur i, lever, ar similar medsnism.
S MCN 13: Chapter 15.44 of the Rands Cucamonga Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read, in wards and figures, as follows:
My? EIRRUM TIM, 37M 3 =b
15.44.010 Added — penalty for Violations
15.44.020 Added — Civil Remedies Available
15.44.030 Added — Seve2ability
-15-44,910 Amehdsi— 7tv for v' 7 t' Sectim 15.44.010 of the
P -awoho nhcmh" Municipal Code is ameirded to read as follows:
Sectim 15.44.010. Penalty for Violation of Title. It shall be
unlawful ifor ar pe ,l ap
fto , rtners ` ^, ar' corporation to violate
am pf ply with any of the requir wxts of
this Title or the Codes adopted hereby. Any person, firm,
partnership, or corpm:atim violating any provision of this Title or
the Codes adopted hereby ar failing to comply with any of its
recluirenenrts shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and nQlm
mhrvictim thereof shall be punished by a fine not w=ording One
Thousand Dollars ($1,(>00.00) or by inprismmrnt not M(cealing 6
months, or by both such fine and iaprismment. Each su,-h person,
firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of separate
Offense for each and every day ar any portion thereof during which any
violation of any of the provisions of this Title or the Codes adopted
hereby is committed, continued or permitted by stxih person, firm,
partnership or mtlxuatim, arid shall be seamed punishable therefor as
provided in this Title.
US
Ordinance No. 457
Page 46
15.44.020 Amended —Civil Remedies Available. section 15.44.020 of
the Rancho Cucamonga Muhieipal Code is amended to read as follows:
Section 15.44.020. Civil Procadres Available. The violation of any
of the provisions of this Title or the Codes adapted hereby shall
constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil
process by meama of rmh'auung Order, preliminary or permanent
injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of
such nuisances.
15.44.030 Amonded—sevex-abil'_tV. Section 15.44.030 of the Rancho
QJramonga municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
Section 15.44.03. Severability. The City Council hereby declares
that should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or ward of
this Title or the Codes hereby adapted be rendered or declared invalid
by any final mat action in a must of mpetent jurisdiction, or by
reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining F¢wisiors,
sections, paragraphs, sentences and wards of this Title and the Codes
hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
SF7C Q( 14: The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the soma to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage
at least ace in The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a raper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the
City of Rancho cuca=ya, California.
—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Jane 17, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: 'William J. O'Neil, rity Engineer
BY: 'Willie Valbuena, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: ORDERING THE VACATION OF THE EXISTING ALLEY EXTENDING FROM
RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE TO SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (LOCATED
SOUTH OF AND GENERALLY PARALLEL TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD).
RECOMENDATION
Tt is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
ordering to be vacated the existinq alley extending from Red Hill Country
Club Drive to San Bernardino Road (located south of and generally
parallel to Foothill Boulevard) and that the City Clerk shall cause same
to record.
BACKGRDUND /ANALYSIS
The alley was dedicated in April 1937, per Tract Map 2521 prior to the
City's incorporation. It is a 20 foot wide unimproved alley extending
diagonally from Red Hill Country Club Drive to San Bernardino Road as
shown on Exhihit "2 ".
The owner of the Magic Lamp Restaurant, Pat Vernola is requesting the
alley vacation. Mr. Vernola owns all of the properties bounded by
Foothill Boulevard, Red Hill Country Club Drive, San Bernardino Road and
the Vince's Spaghetti Restaurant property except for the liquor store at
the northwest corner of the block. The alley is not built to City
Standards and the diagonal portion is presently used as a part of the
Magic Lamp parking lot. The portion connecting to San Bernardino Road is
used to access the delivery dock for Vince's Restaurant and an existing
house located on the same property. The portion of the alley adjacent to
the liquor store is used for access to the rear of the store.
Portions of the alley will be reserved for ingress, egress and fire
access for the Liquor Store and Vince's Restaurant. In addition the
Magic Lamp will provide an easement to allow access frGm San Bernardino
Road to Foothill Boulevard for Vince's Restaurant as shown on
(Exhibit "3 ").
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
VACATE AN ALLEY
June 17, 1992
Page 2
Notices have been posted at the site and the public hearing date was
published in the newspaper. The Planning Commission found the vacation
to be consistent with the General Plan on November 13, 1991.
Respectfully submitted,
Wil l tam J. O'Neil `
City Engineer
WJO:WV:jh
Attachment
••
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
VACATE AN ALLEY
June 17, 1992
Page 2
Notices have been posted at the site and the public hearing date was
published in the newspaper. The Planning Commission found the vacation
to be consistent with the General Plan on November 13, 1991.
Respectfully submitted, `r,
-c G7 / L, u\
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV: h
Attachment
WWI
V
U (\
slrE
e
J
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGWEERING DIVISION
•s
l /C DC
N
rrEM. ALLEY VACATICIII V•OS8
TITLE: VICINITY MAP
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
90
ROAD
/00
ff
N
rrEM:lV V€fArlCN V`V30
TrME: SITE PLAN _
ExHmrr: 2
W
J
0 V
Q Q
i
// - !, J_ MIGM LONC.00CX
CARPORT I /
NOU36 �f..30
N
rTEM:AUAV VAMON V-OSS
TmL. AWPQSEO EASEMEN?
Exxnarr: 3
SAM BERNARD /MU R^ in 91
GQ, o
ETC f9
1
/ 9
S
i
// - !, J_ MIGM LONC.00CX
CARPORT I /
NOU36 �f..30
N
rTEM:AUAV VAMON V-OSS
TmL. AWPQSEO EASEMEN?
Exxnarr: 3
SAM BERNARD /MU R^ in 91
RESOLUTION N0. 7V l q�
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING TO BE VACATED, THE EXISTING ALLEY EXTENDING FROM
RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE TO SAN BERNARDINO ROAD
(LOCATED SOUTH OF AND GENERALLY PARALLEL TO FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD).
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 92 -164, passed on May 20, 1992, the
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a
City alley hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:00
p.m, on June 17, 1992, in the City Council Chambers, located at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing
all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and
WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place,
and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that
the exist nJi-a Tey extending from Red Hill Country Club Drive to San
Bernardino Road (located south of and generally parallel to Foothill
Boulevard) is unnecessary for present or prospective public alley purposes,
and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating said City alley as shown
on Map No. V -058 attached hereto, marked Exhibit "B" on file in the office of
the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in
a legal description which Is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by
reference made a part thereof.
SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations
and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record.
SECTION 3: The subject vacation shall be subject to the DECLARATION
ESTABLISH`TR7-EXSTMT FOR JOINT USE OF ALLEY WAY AND FOR FIRE ACCESS attached
hereto, marked Exhibit "C ".
SECTION 4: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution
to be recor- Ued -in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County,
California.
SECTION 5: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this reso utl -- Roland 1t shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
Cl 2.
91T -O5
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ALLEY VACATION AND RESERVATIONS
THAT PORTION OF ALLEY 20.00 FEET WIDE MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES AS SHOWN ON MAP
OF TRACT NO. 2521 AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 36, PAGES 37 AND 38, OF MAPS. IN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF SAID ALLEY BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE EASTERLY LINE OF RED HILL
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. 50.00 FEET WIDE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF SAID TRACT NO. 2521;
BOUNDED ON THE NORTHEAST BY THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINES OF LOTS 17 THROUGH 25,
INCLUSIVE, OF SAID TRACT N'0. 2521; BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY THE WESTERLY LINE OF
LOT 56 OF SAID TRACT NO. 2521; BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAN
BERNARDINO ROAD; 60.00 FEET WIDE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF SAID TRACT NO. 2521;
BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 55 OF SAID TRACT NO. 2521; AND
BOUNDED ON THE SOUTHWEST BY THE NORTHEASTERLY LINES OF LOT 46 AND LOT 52 THROUGH
SAID LOT 55, INCLUSIVE, OF SAID TRACT NO. 2521.
RESERVING TO THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES OPERATING IN THIS AREA THE RIGHT TO
ENTER SAID PROPERTY FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THEIR RESPECTIVE FACILITIES.
ALSO, RESERVING FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS THAT PORTION OF SAID ALLEY 20.00 FEET WIDE
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 56 OF SAID TRACT NO. 2521; SAID POINT
HEREIN REFERRED TO AS POINT "A "; SAID POINT ALSO BEING IN THE NORTHERLY LINE SAN
BERNARDINO ROAD 60.00 FEET WIDE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE N.89'47'17 "W. ALONG
SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD 20.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
LOT 55 OF SAID TRACT NO, 2521; THENCE N.0'12'28 "E. ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT 55. 112.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 55; THENCE
N.59'25'30 "W. ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 55, 8.22 FEET; THENCE
N.0'20'07 "W. 23.31 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 18 OF SAID TRACT NO.
2521; THENCE 5.59'25'30 "E. ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 18, 28.91
FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 17 OF SAID TRACT N0, 2521; THENCE
CONTINUING 5.59'25'30 "E. ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17; 2.75 FEET
TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 56; THENCE S.0'12'28 "W, ALONG THE
WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 56, 123.44 FEET TO SAID SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 56,
REFERRED HEREIN AS POINT "A ", AND POINT OF BEGINNING.
FURTHER RESERVING FOR FIRE ACCESS THAT PORTION OF SAID ALLEY 20.00 FEET WIDE
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 46 OF SAID TRACT NO. 2521; SAID
POINT HEREIN REFERRED TO AS POINT "B "; SAID POINT Al SO BEING IN THE EASTERLY LINE
OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 50.00 FEET WIDE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE
N.0'12'28 "E. ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 23.18 FEET
TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 25 OF SAID TRACT NO. 2521; THENCE 5.59'25'30 "E.
ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 22 THROUGH 25 INCLUSIVE 222.60 FEET; THENCE
S.30 °34'30 "W. 20.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 52 OF SAID TRACT NO.
2521; THENCE N.59'25'30 "W. ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 52 AND SAID
LOT 46, 210.88 FEET TO SAID MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 46, REFERRED TO AS POINT
"B ", AND POINT OF BEGINNING.
ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF IS A SKETCH ENTITLED EXHIBIT "B ".
No. 21062
9j 9L
-
S!
cam.
\1 r 1, 'y 56 > I O
10ti
V.
f
5,F I'n�
IN hr y, 1
V. 30 "31'JO 'E-
v3n3 ryN 7�. Z
46 47 40 49
�Z
v
p / 60 U
N D HILL CCUN'rAly CLUB DRIVE
aP4 Pg „ MIr
V -05
= No. 21062N �"
vi
CXl1 121 T 'C
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
ALAN D. PAUW, 1NC.
3737 Main Street, Suite 1020
Riverside, CA 92501
DECLARATION ESTABLISHING EASEMFNT FOR JOINT
USE OF ALLEY WAY A4D FOR FIRE ACCESS
THIS DECLARATION ESTABLISHING EASEMENT FOR JOINT USE OF
A
ALLEY WAY AND FOR FIRE ACCESS ( "Declaration ") is made this
i
day of % ';a 1592, by PAT F. VERNOLA and MARY
ANN VERNOLA, husb d and wife ( "Declarants ").
RECITALS:
A. This Declaration relates to that certain real pro-
perty ( "the Property ") situated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
consisting of:
Those portions of Lots 18, and 55, as shown on
Tract No. 2521, recorded in Book 36, Pages 37 and 38 of
Maos, in the Office of the County Recorder, San
Bernardino County, Stare of California, described as
follows:
2
PARCEL NO. '•
Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 18;
Thence N.30 034'30 "E. along tee Southeasterly line
of said Lot 18, 2.30 feet: 'nence N.0 020107 "W.
�.' _ Thence N. 29`32132 "E. 116.09 acct
'.is Northeasterly line of said Lot 18; Said point
being in the Southwesterly line of Foothill Boule-
vard 100.00 feet wide as shown on said Map; Said
point also oeing in a curve concave Northeasterly
and "having a radius of 2450.00 feet; A radial to
said last :mentioned point bears N.30 °04'28 "E.
Thence Northwesterly along said curve through a
central anyle of 0 °30'02 ", an arc length of 21.40
feet; Thence N.59 "25'30 "W, tangent to said curve,
4.60 fee*_; Thence 5.29 932'32 "W. 124.50 feet;
Thence S.0 °20107 "E. 0.85 fee*_ to the Southwesterly
line of said Lot 18; Thence 5.59 °25'30 "E. along
said Southwesterly line of said Lot 18, 28.91 feet
to the Point of Beginning.
PARCEL NO. 2•
Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 55;
Said point being in the Northerly line of San
Bernardino Road, 60.00 feet wide as shown on said
Map of said Tract No. 2521; Thence N.89 °47117 "W.
along the Southerly line of said Lot 55, 6.00
feet; Thence N.0 °20'07 "W. 116.14 feet to the
Northeasterly line of said Lot 55; Thence
5.59 °25'30 "E. along said Northeasterly line of
said Lot 55, 8.22 feet to the Northaast corner of
said Lot 55; Thence S. 0 °12128 "E, along the
Easterly line of said Lot 5b, 112.00 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
.Attached hereto and made a part hereof is a sketch
entitled 'Exhibit "A" snowing the above parcels.
B. Declarants are the owners of those portions of
Lots 18, and 55 within the land area of the parcels
described in Paragraph A above.
C. Declarants desire to establish easements for
ingress and egress, for fire access, and for the use of the
Page Two
alley way, as provided for herein, over the areas described
in Paragraph A above.
]eclarar.ts desire to subject each and every por-
tion Of t..e Property to the easements set forth herein and
to reserve to themselves all the uses provided for herein,
in order that Declarants and each owner, tenant, subtenant,
Or other occupant of any of the Property and the immediately
adjoining Property, and their legal representatives, suc-
cessors, and assicns, and all employees, invitees, custo-
mers, and Datrons thereof, may use the described portions of
the Property for the ingress and egress of automobiles and
other vehicles and use as an alley way.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and
promises herein contained, it is agreed as follows:
1. ESTABLISHMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENTS AND
RESERVATION OF USES: Declarants do hereby reserve to them-
selves 511 the uses of the Property stated herein and
establish and grant non - exclusive easements for ingress and
egress, and an alley way, and for fire access over the Land
area of the parcels described in Paragraph A above under
Recitals, extending from Foothill Boulevard to San
Bernardino Road, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Cali;ornia. The reservation and easement are specifically
illustrated on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated
nerein by rr�terence. Declarants, for themselves and their
Page Three
regal representatives, successors, heirs, and assigns of the
Property, declare that the easements are for the ,purpose of
Tess and egress of automobiles and other vehicles and are
nor.-excl.sive and are intended to be for the use in common
by 0=clarants and the owner(s) of the adjoining property,
the City of Rancho Cucamonga for fire access, and their
!"ai representatives, successors, assigns, employees, invi-
_ees, customers, patrons, and all parties having or
acquiring any right, title, or interest in or to any part of
the Proeerty and adjoining lots within Tract No. 2521,
except Lots 14 and 25. The use of the Property as an alley
way shall be solely for commercial purposes. The benefit
and burden of the access, ano common alley way
shall run with the Property.
2. ';SE OF ACCESS EASEMENTS; COMMON ALLEY WAY: The
access easements and common alley way described above shall
be used for ingress and egress of each and every owner of
any portion of the Property, and adjoining lots within Tract
No. 2521, except Lots 14 and 25, respectively, and their
legal representatives, tenants, subtenants, suppliers,
customers, patrons, employees, and invitees.
i. NO WALL, FENCES,_ OR BARRIERS: No walls, fences.
or other barriers shall be constructed, erected, or main-
tained on or across the easement and common alley way
described nereinabnve, which would prevent or impair the
Page Four
Free use o: exercise of the ingress and egress and /or other
easement rights referred to in this Declaration. It is soe-
__fically acknowledged that it is not the intention of this
s__tior t;t impede or prevent the installation of reasonable
traffic controls as may be necessary to guide and control
_..e orderly flow of traffic from the common alley way which
may be installed and maintained so long as the common alley
'day is not closed or blocked. Declarants, for themselves,
_:,eir legal representatives, and successors and assigns,
soecifically reserve the right to close, temporarily, all or
3nv portion of the said easement areas as may be deemed
legally necessary and sufficient to prevent a dedication
thereof or any accrual of the rights therein in any person
other than as indicated herein.
4. MAINTENANCE: Declarantsr their heirs, successors,
and assigns shall bear the cost of maintaining the common
alley way shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The common
alley way shall be maintained in good condition and repair
and the surface paving thereof shall be maintained in a
smooth and evenly covered condition with the type of sur-
facing materials originally installed, or such substitute as
snall, in all respects, be equal in quality, use, and
durability. Declarants, shall maintain any traffic control
devices, painting or striping, directional signs, and
Tarkers installed or existing on the Property, at their
Page Five
sole cost and expense, repairing or replacing the same as
necessary, Declarants shall cause the same to be ade-
:uata_y insured against public liability, loss, or property
:amaye, and shall pay all real property taxes attributable
to property subject to the easement.
5. ;ENERAL PROVISIONS:
(a) Noma of the terms or conditions hereof shall
be deemed to create a partnership between or among the
Declarants and any o., their heirs, successors, or
assigns, and any purchaser of any of the Property, nor
shall such terms or conditions cause them to be con-
sidered joint venturers or members of any joint
enterprise.
(b) All of the agreements, rights, covenants, and
orants of easements contained herein shall be binding
.Pcn and shall inure to the benefit of the Declarants,
their heirs, successors, legal representatives,
assigns, and all other persons acquiring any part or
portion of the Property, whether by operation of law or
in any manner whatsoever.
(c) This Declaration shall continue for a period
of fifty (50) years from the date hereof and may be
cancelled, changed, modified or amended, in whole or in
part, only by written and recorded agreement executed
by the record owners of the Property. At the expira-
Page Six
tion of the term hereof, this Declaration shall be
automatically renewed for successive ten (10) year
Periods unless terminated in writing by document duly
execct =_d and acknowledged by the owners of the
Property.
(d) in the event of a default or breach in the
oerforma„ce of any of the obligations or agreements
ne reunder, any owner, tenant, or mortgagee shall have
the richt, but not the obligation, to cure such default
for the account of and at the expense of the defaulting
Party, and the party curing such default shall have
the right to recover from the defaulting party all
costs and other sums expended in connection therewith,
together with interest thereon at the maximum legal
rate. In the event of default in the performance of
any .aintenance obligation hereunder, any other party
or person benefitted by this Declaration may cause the
work to be performed upon giving of twenty (20) -days'
written notice, and the defaulting party shall reim-
purse the party performing such work for all costs
reasonably incurred in connection therewith, together
with interest on such costs from the date incurred
until the date paid at the highest rate allowed by Law.
(e) Should any litigation or arbitration be com-
menced or should any party institute any proceeding in
Page Seven
a bankruotcy or similar court which litigation concerns
any provisions of this Ceclaration, or the rights and
duties of any persons or entity in relation thereto or
to interpret any Provisions hereof, a party or parties
prevailing in such litigation shall be entitled, in
addition to such other relief as may be granted, to a
reasonable sum as and for his or their attorney's fees
and court or other costs incurred in such litigation or
arbitration.
(f) In the event that any of the provisions, or
portions thereof, of this Declaration are held to be
unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent
jurisdiction, the validity and enforceability of the
remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be
affected thereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarants have executed this
instrument to be effective on the date and year first above
written.
"DECLARANTS ";
AT F. ERNOLA
Page Eight.
EXH /B /r
B �
30'
i I
;d ;0 56
W No. 21062 x�
C
Z7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
i ss.
COUNTY OF
On ,she day of / /CL Li 1992, before
I
- ?,�,.' Notary F{1ic in and for said
v
State, personally appeared PAT F. VERNOLA and MARY ANN
VERNOLA, personally known to me to be the persons whose
names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknow'edged to me that they executed the same in their
authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the
instrument, the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which
the persons acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OFPWJAL NOTARY SEAL
L"t.N FRANCE
Notazy Pik C tANNKAN�PONOCOUNr
M/tgwn E.V JLC26.101
Page Nine
1:11 T Ur tSA:\t;tYO t;l- 'l;AAVJ1NUA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: tune 17, 1992
TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City "wager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer
Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND
RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSE55MENTS WITHIN THE
PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD -85) FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1992/93.
Fox "90314011MVION
It is recommended that City Council hold the public hearing and approve the annual
Engineer's Report and attached resolution authorizing the levy and collection of assessments
within Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD -85) for the Fiscal Year 1992/93.
Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to fiance the cost of
construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red
Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40 acre facility located on the southwest
corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located
on the southwest comer of ease Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary
includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the
Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Viso Planned Communities.
Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must hold a
public hearing and approve an annual Engineer's Report which reviews the status of the
district and discloses the projected revenue and expenditures which establish the assessment
rate for the next Fiscal Year. The assessment rate increased from $35.00 to $52.00 during the
1991/92 Fiscal Year, this rate will remain at $52.00 for the 1992/93 Fiscal Year. Assessments
for PD -85 will be levied according to the following schedule:
Single Family Residential
Less than 1.30 acres
151 acres to 3.50 acres
3.51 acres to 7.(N) acres
7.01 acres to 14.(N)acres
14.01 acres to 25.!10 acres
25.01 acres and Larger
$52.00
$26.00
$'8.0
$182.00
$364.00
$7281N)
$1,3oo.t10
Respectfully submitted.
Wm. Joe O'Neil;
City Engineer
Attachments:
Resolution
Executive Summary
Annual Engineer's Report
to l
Park and Recreation Improvement District Highlights
Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD -85)
• Installation o: Calsense water conservation device
• Installation of touch -pad cost monitoring system for park lights
Rehabilitation of equestrian facilities
• 151 assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 4.15 %.
• 91/92 Rate = $52.00 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $52.00
TV
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85 -PD (HERITAGE AND RED
HILL COMMUNITY PARKS)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on
the 6th day of May, 1992, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 92 -148 to
order the therein described work in connection with the Park and
Recreation Improvement District which Resolution of Intention No. 92 -148
was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by
law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on
file in the Office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered
evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this
proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplation work and
the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now
acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work.
NOW. TEEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience requires
the levy and collection of assessments within the Park and Recreation
Improvement District for the Fiscal Year 1992/93, and said City Council
hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of
Intention No. 92 -148 , be done and made; and
SECTION 2: Be if further resolved that the report filed by the
Engineer is hereby finally approved; and
SECTION 2;, Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal
Year 1992/93, method of assessment in the Engineers Report and the
authorization to expend 1991/92 administrative fees for park maintenance
are hereby approved.
a
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
PD -85
Fiscal Year 1992/93
' �,10sfpM y
t m
V P
Approved:
/oC
William J. q Neil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Report
PD-85
Fiscal Year 1992193
AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
IV . ranort for the 1992/93 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the Ciy Council of the Cite
of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, landscape and
Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Stress, and Highways code. Provisions for
this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the landscape and Lighting Act of 1572.
The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of
assessments for the Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PDRS, thereafter referred to as
"the District'. This District, using direct benefit asses :.nests, has been created to provide funds to
finance the :ost of cc nstrurtion, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park
and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cuc&wonga.
FINDINGS
Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit
rather than according to assessed value. The section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be
apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among
all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by
each such lot or parcel from the improvements:"
The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the impruven,ents is contained in
the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways
Code, State of California).
The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into
benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location., and extent of the improvements, the
vatious areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the "me degree of
benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or roncontiguous areas.
As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and,
therefore, are net govemed by Article XIIiA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a cirv,
county, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular
,agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of -way,
public utility transmission nght-of -way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment.
The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage
DISTRICT .ANALYSIS
A Improvement District 8eomdary
The improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general
exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria & Terra Vista Planned
Communities.
All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in
accorda..ce with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office
of the San llemardino County Assessor in the Hail of Records, 172 West Third Street, San
Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference.
B. D,strict Name
CGy of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -&5.
C. Facilities
I existing works of improvement are generally described as follows:
I.The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading,
planting, irrigation, onsite road:,, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms,
equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and
walking, jogging and equestrian trails.
2.The construction of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading,
planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape,
restrroms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, inalor
lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent
public street improvements.
D. The assessment rate for the 91/92 FY is 552.00, this rate will stay at $52.00 for the 92/93 FY. It
is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the maintenance costs and debt service for the
92/93 FY. 151 new assessment units have been annexed into the district
ESTIMATE Or WORK
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in
subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against
assessment or any deficits shall be included in the ,ssessment for the following fiscal year.
Regular Payroll
Fringe Benefits
Vehicle Maint. /Operations
Maintenance & Operations
Equipment Maintenance
General Liability
Contract Services
Capital Expenditures
Install Calsense System
Heritage - Resurface Equestrian Rink
Install Touch Pad System For Lights
Water Utilities
Electric Utilities
Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and General Overhead
Delinquency C ontingency
Debt Service
Gross Revenue Required:
92/93
$226,200
$79,170
$24,000
$45,000
$6,000
$13,730
$5,000
$10,000
$40,000
$30,000
$87,000
$606,10()
$245,470
$65,910
1820,
$1,i29,380
Less: 91/92 District Carryover <5100.810>
Total Assessment District Revenue Required: $1,634,670
METHOD OF SPREAD
The landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any
formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels with the District in
proportion to the estimated benefits received.
A.
B.
Definitions
The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as
follows;
CATEGORY A - includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain
ranges of parcel size.
CATEGORY B - includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C.
CATEGORY C - includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the
County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or
which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were
iurluded as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example,
residential or agricu!t_ ^.e. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed.
Formula
The assessment to-mula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San
Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's r 4rcel maps.
Category A:
All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions.
Parcel Size Range
Less than 15 acres and
151 to 33 acres
and
3.51 to 7.0 acres
and
7.01 to 14.0 acres
and
14.01 to 25.0 acres
and
25.01 acres & larger
and
Number of Eristing Res.
Dwelling Units /Parcel
1 or more dwelling units
2 or more dwelling units
4 or more dwelling units
S or more dwelling units
15 or more dwelling units
26 or more dwelling units
Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt
Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are
built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually
and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development
Category B:
All parcel not defined in Category A or Category C.
Category C:
All exempt parcels as defined below:
1. All properties currently tax exempt;
2. All public ownerships;
3. Railroad mainline rightsof -way;
4. Major utility transmission rights-of-way;
S. Mineral rights;
6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon;
7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $800 and 1.5
apes or less; and
C. Summary of Prelimbuvy Assessment Amounts
Category A:
The preliminary estimated assessment rate which will be levied during fiscal year 1992/93 is
$52.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more
than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $52.00 times the
number of dwelling units.
Category B:
The assessment which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 1992/93
shall be according to the following schedule:
Definition Assessment Per Parcel
less than 150 acres
$ 26.00
151 acres to 3.50 acres
$ 78,00
351 acres to 7.0 acres
$ 182.00
7.01 acres to 14.0 acres
$ 364.00
14.01 acres to 25.0 acres
$ 728.00
25.01 acres & larger
$1,300,00
Category C:
The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels.
PROJECTED 1992/93 ASSESSMENTS
22,728 Single Family Parcels 22,728 units at
$52.00 =
$1,181,856
241 Multi- Family Parcels 4,793 units at
$52.00 =
$249,236
Less than 1.50 Acres (935) Parcels 926 units at
$ 26.00 =
$24,076
15 Acres to 3.50 Acres (409 Parcels) 404 units at
$ 78.00 =
$ 31,512
351 Acres to 7.0 Acres (227 Parcels) 226 units at
$182.00 =
$ 41,132
7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres (131 Parcels) 125 units at
$364.00 =
$ 45,500
14,01 Acres to 25.0 Acres (45 Parcels) 45 units at
$728.00 =
$32,760
25.01 Acres or larger (23 Parcels) 22 units at
$1,300.00 =
$ 2UW
29,269 units
$1,634,672
PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRK /7 85 -- PD
„-�
%lw own
CKAM 05 = W BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ( �
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
„ � � CALIFORNIA
ro e5
ANNEXATIONS
ANNEXED
<,
199I47
TRN1AN866R
AU
ANNEXED
20,
199126
1�IA101E92
AV
ANNEXED
my t35'A 1991
TR
21 Au
ANNEXED
FEB 20,
199155
RUARY
AV
ANNEXED
FEBRUARY 6,
1991
R ISA
2.0 AU
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I
Lg,WMV
0 §LWAt jJ! MrduiA
TO& Coe rrcm)
O uCUwr���� aTrs�eiF�u�Mbfrvk'
stasi toot ��� e�cu)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA T7141
COUNTY OF SON BERNARDINO
149(1 a
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
F. %MIBIT 'q•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
�a
w
i
v
m
7 116 i15 116
i LEGEND
® CITY 101INtAI1RD ARRA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
J
STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR 1:192 -1
v
'A"
1 2 a 6 S 1 6
7
S
9
0° ISAA ORD DRIVE
m
10
s
25 26
23
26
11
22
i
s
1S 19
21
12
«
20
d
�v
w
i
v
m
7 116 i15 116
i LEGEND
® CITY 101INtAI1RD ARRA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
J
STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR 1:192 -1
v
'A"
ai
i
Si
axnieir •a•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
its
c'.+rn
M C TY CINNCAINEM AUA
ICITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
- SR i X114
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHielT •A•
&SSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. T
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. T AND 2
39 40 41 a2 43 44 45 46 47 148 I a9 50
51
38
52
37
24 23 70 9 53
35
25 22 it 8 54
35 26 21 �,
12 7
34 27 20 13 6
i
33 28 19 14 5 t
32 29 18 15 4
2
31 30 17 16 3
LEGEND
®CITY MAINTAINED
AREAS
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
TR. 13703
�. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHMT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
-
--- --------------- -
2
uj I
qe!
6-ij
LEGEND
Existing Homes
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
13 e
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 17, 1992
Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer
Wall— " --,ickney, Associate Engineer
N
CONSIDF°' TiON TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS
AND RESOL.[.,. 4 FOR TH? LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 313, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
It is recommended that City Council hold the public hearing and approve the Annual
Engineer's Reports and Resolution establishing the assessment rates for landscape Maintenance
Districts Nos, 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1992/93.
Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. Several factors have impacted the
districts budget for the upcoming year. The most significant issue is an increase in water rates.
The Cucamonga County Water District will raise the domestic water rate 30% and the
agricultural water rate 46% effective July 1, 1992 for all the districts. Also, the Southern
California Edison Company will raise electrical rate over 9% for the 1992/93 fiscal year. In
several districts new landscape areas have been added for the coming year. In some cases, these
areas have been maintained by a "project developer" and are now ready for inclusion within
the appropriate district. These areas are not always accompanied with additional assessment
units so the net impact will increase the assessment rate somewhat. In prior years, some
districts have carryover revenue which was used to cushion rate adjustments. In most districts
these funds have been expended. In past years, the City's General Fund was used to provide
funding in these districts. General Fund dollars are no longer available to provide that support.
A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to each district's budget to cover anticipated
delinquencies in tax payments. During the current recessionary period delinquencies have
become , < ignificant factor and represent a revenue decrease in all districts. This trend causes
rates to rise somewhat to offset the revenue loss. If the delinquencies are less than expected,
funds within the district can be transferred to cover required expenditures,
The following, along with reference to the Annual Engineer's Report, identifies the required
budget for each district and any carryover used to reduced the rates.
Landscape Maintenance Digtri-t 1,10, 1 . General Coty
The recommended rate of $72.47 from $69.95 reflects increased water rates and inflation costs
and the acceptance of Fast and West Beryl Parks into the District which will add park area of
10 acres along with the additional 3.86 acres of ground cover, shrubs and turf.
Laadvdpe Maintenance Di tr' t No 2 -Victoria Planned Communi h
The recommended rate of $405.30 from $376.00 reflects increased water rates and inflation costs.
LMD #2 has the largest landscape area of any district in the City with 118.62 acres, of which
27.50 acres is parks.
Landscape Maintenance a-trict N12 3a - Hvs�o
The recommended rate of $393.04 from $37938 reflect the water rates and inflation costs of the
district.
Liodacape Maintenance Di t ' t ND.3b -CommerclaNadustrial
The recommended rate of $347.08 from $248.99 reflect increases in water rates and inflation
costs. In addition, 1.95 acres of ground cover, turf and shrubs have been added to the district,
this includes the south half of Foothill Medians from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue.
additional assessment
Landscape Maintenance Dis jet Ng .4 - Terra Vista
The recommended rate of $248.24 from 8240.18 reflects Increased water rates and inflation costs.
in addition, Milliken Park, a 7 acre facia 7 and 3.42 acres of ground cover ,turf and shrubs were
accepted into the district to be mamtaiaed.
Landscape Maintenanc District No - Tot Lo t
The recommended rate of $108.78 from $105.00 reflects water rates and inflation costs of the
district.
Lame Maintenance D'str'rt Nn 6 - Caqm
The recommended rate of $241% from $235.48 reflecs water rates and inflation costs of the
district.
Landscape Maintenance District No 7 - North Ftiwanda
The recommended rate of $305.43 will not increase for the FY 92/93, due to various areas not
coming in 1991/92 as projected. These areas are projected for the 92/93 fiscal year.
124
al ana4_d aintenanre District No. 8 • Co h Fti,nanria
The recommended rate of $150.45 from $14522 reflects water rates and inflation costs for the
district.
Respectfully Subrollted, _
William J. O'N4
City Engineer
Attachments:
Resolution
Executive Summary
Engineer's Reports
Iti5
Landscape Maintenance Districts Highlights
Landscape Maintenance District 1- General City
• Added Ea . & West beryl Park (20 acres)
• increased m hintained landscape area by 23.86 acres
• 25 acres of parks are maintained by district They are:
Hear Gulch Park
East & West Beryl Park
• Total maintained area = 54.94 apes
• 151 assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 12.44 %.
• 91/92 Rate = $69.95 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $72.47
Landscape Maintenance District 2- Victoria Planned Community
• 25 acres of parks which include Kenyon Park Victoria Groves Park, Vintage
Park, and Windrows Park
• Relativiv low density of houses to landscaped area as compared to other
districts such as Terra Vista or Caryn Planned Communities
• With 118.62 acres of maintained area, LIvfD2 has the largest maintained
landscape area of all the districts
• No assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 13.12 %.
• 91 /92 Rate = $376.00 - Proposd 92/93 Rate = 5405.30
Landscape Maintenance District 3a- Hyssop
• Consists only of a landscaped parkway on Hyssop Drive
• Total maintained area = 0.14 aces
• No assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 37,507%.
• 91/92 Rate =$ 379 .38- Propostd 92/93 Rate = $393.04
12 (c
Landscape Maintenance District 36 - Commercial7industrial
• Southerly half of Foothill Medians from Haven Ave. to Roche:;er Ave.
accepted into district in FY 92/93
• Total maintained area = 924 acres
• 29.5 assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 12.93%.
• 91/92 Rate = $ 248 .99 - Proposed 92/93 Rate= $347.08
Landscape Maintenance District 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community
• 27 acres of parks which include Spruce Park, Coyote Canyon Park, West
Grzenway Park, & Milliken Park
• Milliken Park, which is 12 acres, will be added to the district in ;-Y 92/93
• 15.42 acres of new maintained area added to district in FY 92/9.1 which
include the northerly half of the Foothill Medians
• Total maintained area= 40.89 acres
• 357 assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 1.87% (one of the lowest of all the do ltricts),
• 91/92 Rate = $240.18 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $24824
Landscape Maintenance District 5 - Tot Lot
Total maintained area = 033 acres
• No assessments have been added to the district.
Tax delinquency rate for the district is 8.23%
• 91/92 Rate = $105.00 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $108.78
Landscape Maintenance District 6 - Caryn Planned Community
• Total maintained area= 17.89 acres (no additional area will be added in FY 92/93)
• No assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 10.75%
• 91/92 Rate = $235.48 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = 5243.96
'1 -1
Landscape Maintenance District 7- North Etiwanda
• Total maintained area = 13.01 acres
• The median on 24th Street, the southerly parkway on 24th Street, and the
westerly MW D area (west of Ridgeline PI.) has been added to the area
currently maintained by the district
234 assessments have ben added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 34.60% (the highest of the
residential based landscape districts)
• 91/92 Rate = $305.43 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $305.43 (no change)
Landscape Maintenance District 8- South Etiwanda
• Total maintained area= 0.29 acres
• 35 assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 0.19%
• 91/92 Rate = $145.22 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $150.45
W.
RESOLUTION NO. 92- lq`l
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 3A,
3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAS YEAR 1992/93 PURSUANT
TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION
WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 3A, 38,
4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the
6th day of May, 1992, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 92 -152 to order the
therein described work in connection with Landscape Maintenance District Nos.
1, 2 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which Resolution of Intention No. 92 -152 was
duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law,
shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file
in the office of the City clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered
evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this
proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the
benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired
jurisdiction to order the proposed work.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga 'tFat the public interest and convenience requires the levy and
collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3,
3A, 36, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1992/93, and said City Council
hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of
Intention No. 92 -152, be done and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the
Engineer s ere y finally approved; and
SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal
Year 1992 an method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby
approved.
IYq
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Approved:
(General City)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
city
"aa
Exp- /2-31-93
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
(General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Equestrian Trails)
Elaal Year 92/93
The FY 92/93 annua: report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways,
Medians, Parks and Equestrian Trails) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of
Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Backeround:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD ill) represents 1,147,954 square feet of landscape
area and 25 acres of parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites
are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather
benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not
:epresent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within
this district have been annexed upon development.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, entry
monuments, equestrian trails and parks. The 25 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which
-is 5 acres and 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, which are being added to the district this
fiscal year. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape
maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and
Application Crew and the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Cews.
Proiected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD kl are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has wi 4 a private
landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the
equestrian hails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the
district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD @i are as follows:
81m
2L2a
Ground Coverand Shmbs
17.73
21.47
Turf
135
1.47
Parks
5.00
25.00
Equestrian. Trails
7IN
im
Total Area in LMD kl
31.03Acres
54.94 Acres
The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape
maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and
Application Crew and the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Cews.
Proiected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD kl are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has wi 4 a private
landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the
equestrian hails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the
district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD @i are as follows:
Regular Payroll
$71,170.00
Fringe Benefits
$24,910.00
Maintenance and Operations
$43,890.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
$16,310.00
Contract Services
Revenue
$510,450
Landscape and Tree Maintenance
$222,000.00
Capital Expenditures
0.5 $36.24
Tree, Shrub & Ground Cover
Totals
Replacement
;:4,610.00
General Liability
&5,280.00
Water Utilities
$153140.00
ElecWc Utilities
S16,040,LT1
Subtotal:
$558, ?80.00
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
$96,170.00
Delinquency Contingency
580,64(i.W
Total Revenue Required: $735,290.60
Less: 91/92 District Carryover - <S42,220,01),>
Assessment Revenue Required 1693,070.00
For 92/93 the district budgeted $4640.00 routine tree,shrub and ground cover repair. No vehicle
or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency Contingmcy in an amount of
$80,640.('X), represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district.
Analysis,
Budgeted maintenance costs for LMD pl increased from $573,010 in 91/92 to $735,290 in 92/93.
This increase can be attributed to an increase of 3.74 acres of landscape area and the addition of
East and West Beryl Parks to LMD pl. These parks will add an additional 20 acres of
maintained area to the district. 151 new assessments have been annexed into the district.
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit
Lad Use Tytx:
No. of
Urns
Assess.
Rte
Unit Rate/
Single Family Parcel
7,042
$72.47
Fa r AU
1.0 $72.47
Revenue
$510,450
Multi - Family Parcel
1163
$72.47
0.5 $36.24
$192,57,0
Totals
8,805
1§2LO70
LANDSCAPE MAIN`T'ENANCE DISTRICT 1
CREATED 06 JUNE 10 BY
RMUn MVICES DEPARTIEr
GIS DIVISION
IT1141 OF 85I NFATPC� NCA
mm
1 � 1
1 ♦ 1 1 1
YILSOM �I nV - -7
--
at 1 "•E
WI
BNSfl
,NE No
L �h � -� -! fIIY IYfS
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN DERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
NLL1W7E BMW
1
1 -
XILLSIV t
1 �
1
I
CREATED 06 JUNE 10 BY
RMUn MVICES DEPARTIEr
GIS DIVISION
IT1141 OF 85I NFATPC� NCA
mm
1 � 1
1 ♦ 1 1 1
YILSOM �I nV - -7
--
at 1 "•E
WI
BNSfl
,NE No
L �h � -� -! fIIY IYfS
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN DERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
NLL1W7E BMW
Um 1
ANNEXATION^
ANNEXED
NOVEMBER 20,
1991
T 14192 -1
26 AU
ANNEXED
MAY 15 1991
TR 13114
21 AU
ANNEXED
SEPTEMBER 4,
1991
TR
47
ANNEXED
FEBRUARY 20,
1991
55 AU
ANNEXED
FEBRUARY 6,
1991
PM 13113
2.0 AU
1 EE T 'q•
ASSESSMENN T DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 2
LLGENU
C!TT MAIMTAInD AALA
N.,.-.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Y1 a STATE OF CALIFORNIA
exnieit •a•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET- LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
® C;T7 MNNTA1NfC AREA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SB�31..Lg
• STATE OF CALIFORNIA
,s
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER
mauo
Hi Sao a&wAa 4=w w4mr (nmeu)
O MIeALWW* tAhfAA"jA
G M W rag C4+ tea,)
O LIAIICtAAS�t S}YtAgfA4A MMNw'
tM1YSr net Cu rAeu)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TCACT
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDI 40 149O6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,
EXHIBIT 'A•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
\
38 39 40 41 I42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51
I 52
37
24 23 10 9 53
36
22 it 8 54
35
34
I I 33
32
31
i�
i
LEGEND
CITY MAINTAI *.'D
AREAS
21 12 7
20 13 6
19 14 5 1
18 15 4
17
16 3 2
CITY Oil RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
TR. 13703
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHiMT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
77
tul
2.
or
F71 T
dz
ul
71
LEGEND
Existing Homes
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucainorg
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
(Victoria Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
M
i Ma AMOwu
/J -3/ •q9
li
Approved:
William I. O'Neil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
(Victoria Planned Community)
The n 92/93 •.nual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned
Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Background.
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the
Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as
such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those
parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are
charged to those parcels within that planned community.
The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, equestrian
trails and parks. The 27.5 "rs of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves
Park, Vintage Park and N9ndmws Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape
maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and
Application Crew and the parks are maintained by th° City's Park Maintenance Crews.
&sied9sLCllata•
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the
equestrian trails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the
district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 areas follows:
91M
22M
Ground Cover and Shrubs
45.28
47.99
Turf
3853
40.13
Parks
27.50
27.50
Eq Lquaa Tmas
3ddl
11M
Total Area in LMD 02
11431 Acres
118.62 Acres
The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape
maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and
Application Crew and the parks are maintained by th° City's Park Maintenance Crews.
&sied9sLCllata•
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the
equestrian trails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the
district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 areas follows:
e
Regular Payroll
$282,400.00
Part Time Salaries
4,650,00
Fringe Benefits
$98,840.00
Maintenance and Operations
$30,000.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
$101000.00
Contract Services
Facer
1.0
Landscape and Tree Maintenance
$575,000.00
Capital Expenditures
Parcel
Tree, Shrub & Ground Cover
$405.30
Replacement
$12510.00
Irrigation Renovation
4,880.00
General Liability
$13,920.00
Water Utilities
$420,000.00
Electric Utilities
12100QM
Subtotal:
$1,472,200.00
Assessment Administration and
$405.30
General Overhead
$142,070.00
Delinquency Contingency
$195.390 00
Total Revenue Required:
$1,809,660.00
Less: 91/92 District Carryover
<$171.040.Oo>
Assessment Revenue Required
$1,638,620.i7i1
For 92/93 the district budgeted $12510 for routine tree, shrub and ground cover repair and $4880
for irrigation renovation. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The
Delinquency Contingency in an amount of $195,390, represents the amount of unpaid taxes
within the district.
Analysis:
In FY 91/92, the Assessment rate for LMD 42 was $376.00, this will increase to $405-30 for the
92/93 FY is to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. Ther were no new assessments
units added to the distrct this year.
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district
t•„vtt t�
Unit
Tycce
No. of
U
Unit
Rate/
Single Family
Parcel
1
3,763.00
R le
$405.30
Facer
1.0
Arl
$405.30
Reve
$1,525,140
Multi- Family
Parcel
124.00
$405.30
1.0
$40.5.30
$`0,260
Commercial
Acre
15.74
$405.30
2.0
$810.60
$12,7,10
vacant
Acre
49800
$405.30
0.25
$101.33
Bi lfa
TOTALS
4,400.74
$1 .&48,62
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 2
,1;
IL wwwww. w wwwTww�ww�wwwwRy
! 1
1 1
! ___�ILLSIGF RO 1
uLwww
CREATED a• PINE 19W V.
MUNCY SENV10 DEPANIID'M
CIS DIVISION
IRpp
OF RANCHO CUCAYDNCA
969 I851. UT 2 0
I I I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
1
n t CR um
r
NunaE euwm
iamT eamwn
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a
Approved:
(Hyssop)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
IN No. a�osa
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a
(Hyssop Maintenance District)
Eiacal Year /91
The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance
District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of
the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Backgm,nd :
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (LMD #3a) represents a landscape parkway on Hyssop
Drive south of Sixth Street. The site is associated with an. area within that district and as
such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those
parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged
to those parcels within that district.
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
21M 91.121
Ground Cover and Shrubs 0.14 0.14
Turf am 4m
Total Area in LMD #3a 0.14 Acres 0.14 Acres
The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape
maintenance company.
IU'sdr=,-riL•Si"
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #3a are for direct maintenance of ground cover and
shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and
testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and naintain LMD #3a are as
follows:
Regular Payroll
$30.00
Fringe Benefits
$10.00
Maintenance and Operations
$210.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
$0.00
Contract Services
Landscape and Tree Maintenance
$1,850.00
Capital Expenditures
Irrigation Renovation
$4,580.00
General Liability
$40.00
Water Utilities
$800.00
Electric Utilities
$120,
Subtotal:
$7,610.00
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
$280.00
Delinquency Contingency
$220,00
Gross Revenue Required:
$8,140.00
Less: 91/92 District Carryover _
<$4.990.00>
Total Revenue Required:
3$ ,150.00
For 92/93 the district budgeted $4,580.00 irrigation renovation. No vehicle or equipment
purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency Contingency in an amount of $220.00,
represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district.
ADal$$19:
In the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LMD k3a was 379 38 /A.U. This will increase to $393.04
for the FY 92/93 to cover the current maintenance casts of the district. No new assessments were
annexed into the district this year.
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit Rate /.
Iand Use Tvoe_ Units Rabe Factor A.U. Revenue
Industrial Parcel 8 393.04 1.0 $393.04 $31� 50.00
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 3A
I
ixnLStoE � Ra I�,
♦
♦ x.VIYAx _ Y -
♦
♦ I I <
MIAM OS NNE 10 By
N6D m SOME BEPA"No
Gil ar�ox
OP RANQIO NCAYONCA
11 9E�IBS1. EIR. 2d0
I I I
I I <
�' <I
BASELIN E
ol I :I WI ♦ .�
_ � I
FOO1xILt a
I I 1
♦
6SM _ SI
i
����� —� ■ mw BQ►DARY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA -'
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b
(Commercial /Industrial)
Approved:
Fiscal Year 1992/93
Elm MM2053 'I;
xa /1 -31.9
With am J. Q'Neil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b
(CorninercialHndustrial Maintenance District)
Fiscal Year 97193
The F192/93 annual report for landscape Maintenance District No. 31, (Commercial /Industrial
Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1,
Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act
of 1972).
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD R3b) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/ Industrial Maintenance Distort. These sites are associated with areas within
that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly
attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this
district are charged to those parcels within that district.
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows
2UU 92M
Ground Cover and Shrubs 4.42 5.95
Turf LU 329
Total Area in LMD Rib 7.29Acres 9.24 Acres
The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape
maintenance company.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD Rah are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with hee maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
A portion of the budgeted costs are for the maintenance for the south half of the median islands
on Foothill Blouevard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. These maitenance areas will
be added to the district this fiscal year.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD R3b are as follows
P[QnnSed Maintenante Bust, o for 1992/93
Regular Payroll
$2,040,00
Fringe Benefits
$710.00
Maintenance and Operations
$'15,000,30
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
$1,030.00
Contract Services
Landscape and Tree Maintenance
$136,540.00
Capital Expenditures
Tree,Shrub and Ground Cover Replacement
$0.00
General Liability
53190,00
Water Utilities
$39,470.00
Electric Utilities
$9,92
Subtotal:
$207,900.00
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
$33.350.0(1
Gross Revenue Required:
$241,250.00
Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit _
$146.750.00
Total Revenue Required:
$388,000 .00
Analysis:
In the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LMD 836 was $248.99 /A.U.,this will increase to $347.08
for the FY 92/93 to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. 29.5 assessment units
have been added to the district this vear.
laz3a,�.
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district.
Unit No. of Assess. Unit Rate/
I}= Urns Rte Factor MI. Re n ?Ltw l /Comm.
Acre 1117.9 $347.08 lA $347.08 $388,0110
Totals 38$ g,O
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 3D
s
•1 1
� �rrrrrrrrrr�rr�
eaESIM eu
/
e.rE�x _ sr
cmm C5 AN m By-
[law saym WSW
wmm
IA�ll
uaw iwr --
ee, >•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
Irr �
1 1
1
nr an m
ULIWTE NEW
■ /611iT /0.1DAAT
LMO 39
ANNEXATIONS
ANNEXED
MAY 1 1901
1991
RN 7451
1.77 AU
ANNEXED
TTTOSER716, 1991
ANNEXED
O
2,38 AU
ANNEXED
FEBRUARY 1991
93 AU
220,
86
9.92 AU
ANNEXED
MARCH 1991
DR 89.12
DR 009,
9.06 AU
ANNEXED
<,
SCUP
1991
03.28
1.04 AU
ANNEXED
1992
DRR 89 -1315,
93 AU
ANNEXED
FEBRUARY 19,
1992
DR 89.12
4.4 AU
'A•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET UGHTIK3 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING `MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
of
Vi
9"95 LUCAS
N /"/Yc// RD
V
J'
v
IcCeIA°Th+ 57R°Er
JO^ r,PB.$T 7,4PE:S - 2 EA, E11G41114,rU3 N/CHOC/✓
STREET L /GHT - ,NONE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
� COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
���
STATE OF CALIFORNIA cop 91-
A•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6
STiRSET L /vh7S
SrAWer TREES
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Cup E9 -c
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
r—� sxm=T s ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
DIAGRAM
LAND
I SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
i_ 1! MINTM I ^"-r i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9o-os
/ e Wish •�•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
/ �rI
Y/
i :..L.
.6
?RaEC-
CITY OF RANCHO OUCANIONGA
COUNTY OR RAN BERNARDINO
3 STATE OR CALIFORNIA
.1
ASS cSSMEMT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
/V//V7H ST
I
r ` _
Q,
�I
"a.
oD D , `
D�
n• zsT �1 gOV�� 0
FEROhf
/ J I
s333
e
D n:
LEGEND v D(IU
STREET UGHTS /6A
STREET STTREET TREES 9,6,4
Pr�-us ca�c�RS -A�ri
(O.!°AOrO.PDI
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
OrPE9- /2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
(Terra Vista Planned Community)
Approved:
Fiscal Year 1992/93
or No. �
4An
-,,-3/•93
k
J. O'Neil, City
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
(Terra Vista Planned Community)
fiscal Ye 9 7193
The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned
Community ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Bac mend:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD 44) represents landscape sites throughout the
Terra Vista Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district
and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to
those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are
charged to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of
parkways, median islands, paseos and parks. there were 15.42 acreas of maintained area
added to the distrct this year, the breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
The turf, ground corer and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos
are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, the parks are
maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews.
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD p4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
A portion of the budgeted costs are for the maintenance for Milliken Park, which is located on
the east side of Milliken Avenue, one half mile north of Foothill Blvd. and the north half of
the medio:, islands on Foothill Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. These
maintenance areas will be added to the district this fiscal year.
T:.? projected costs to operate and maintain LMD 04 are as follows:
41!41
41[43
Ground Cover and Shrubs
5.43
7.27
Turf
5.04
6.62
Parks
1190
MIX)
Total Area in LMD N4
25.47Acres
40.89Acres
The turf, ground corer and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos
are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, the parks are
maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews.
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD p4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
A portion of the budgeted costs are for the maintenance for Milliken Park, which is located on
the east side of Milliken Avenue, one half mile north of Foothill Blvd. and the north half of
the medio:, islands on Foothill Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. These
maintenance areas will be added to the district this fiscal year.
T:.? projected costs to operate and maintain LMD 04 are as follows:
Regular Payroll
$244,030.00
Part Time Salaries
$4,650.00
Fringe Benefits
$85,410.00
Maintenance and Operations
$66,560.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
$85,200.00
Contract Services
Acre
Landscape and Tree Maintenance
$168,000.00
Capital Expenditures
Vacant
TreeArub and Ground Cover Replacement
$3,980.00
Terra Vista /Base Line Median Renovation
$265,33000
General Liability
$5,540.00
Water Utilities
$120,670.00
Electric Utilities
$23,150,
Subtotal:
$1,072,520.00
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
$78,550.00
Delinquency Contingency
$12.140 00
Gross Revenue Required:
$1,163,2100.00
Less: 91/92 District Carryover
<$265,330.00>
Total Revenue Required:
$897,880.00
For 92/93 the district budgeted $3,980.00 tree,shrub and ground cover replacement and $265,330
for the landscape renovation of the Terra Vista Parkway and Base Line Road Median Islands.
The hinds for this renovation come from the carryover of last fiscal year's district budget. No
vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency Contingency in an
amount of $12,140.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district.
AnalvsFs6
In the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LMD A4 was 240.18 /A.U.,this will increase to
$248.24/A.U. for the FY 92/93 to cover the cument maintenance costs of the district. 357 new,
assessments units were annexed to the district this year. Attached is the Assessment Rate
Computation Chart.
EY 92193 Assessment Rate:
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Rate /.
Single Family
Parcel
1687.00
$248.24
$418,790
Multi
Parcel
1921.00
$221.11
$424,750
Commercial
Acre
137.15
$387.96
$53,210
Vacant
Acre
31.00
$36.42
$1,13p
$897880
s»
k)
))
\�
))}
\}
72
)
\��
}
m!
�
\��
\
!!
u
!
!a
r -®
�
■,
�
!
#(»
�
!
■ ;@
--
!
¢$
|`
J
;
|
`
!
�
!a!
®#r
�
�
)
)
t
$
}
�
\
/
k)
))
\�
.0 if
)!
\�
\ k
k §
)
\ (
;
\ k
\
2
t
]
))}
\}
72
)
)
, !
u
!
!a
r -®
�
■,
�
!
#(»
�
!
■ ;@
!
¢$
J
;
!
!a!
®#r
*q
\
/
/
$
\ \9
!
§§@
)
)
E §
}
\
.0 if
)!
\�
\ k
k §
)
\ (
;
\ k
\
2
t
]
))}
\}
72
)
)
, !
.0 if
)!
\�
\ k
k §
)
\ (
;
\ k
\
2
t
]
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 4
uwh Maw
swr exam
�► CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -H
seR� o�
� Ica SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
9WW W 2W CALIFORNIA —
LMO 6
ANME"TION3
ANNEXED JUNE 19, 1991
RM 13825 27.26 AU
ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991
TR 13351 118 AU
ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 197 AU
TR 13717
ANNEXED SERTEMBER 18, 199!
COYOTE CANYON ELEM 6.88 AU
ANNEXED MARCH 6, 1991
TR 13351 -1 8 AU
ANNEXED AUGUST 7. 1991 p AU
CUP 88.12
E%Hf8lT 'G•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
F
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
�iTA t?aaS
cj STATE OF CALIFORNIA
i
1
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
` i TC� �JdB. a � 13359
1 1 rI
Y
14
orriuir .M'OlGn.wF MeA 6219 S.I.
15515111f OI1G1111
UIDSCIll 11IlfllloCl 0I3f1ICf 10. 1
TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ( TRACT NO. 13351
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
� r - TR Isgs,
��- STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ISSRSSNRNT DIIGRIN•LIIDS( N1I1TRIlICR DISTRICT ID.
WEST GREENWAX TRAIL
I FOR. PCL. 21 T.M. 11295 1
QUAtII� I .
/TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA : 13.500 S.F.
/ HARDSCAPE AREA : 9,130 S.F.
GROUND COVER AREA 9,980 S.F.
( 4- THICK SHREDDED MULCH 1
5 GAL. SHRUBS : 469 EA.
14m. LOT 1. Tn. NO. 2262
—zz OCMi. 1' 100'
ASSRSSNRr, DIAGRAM
LANDSCAlR NAINTRNANCR CISTRICT NO. 4
CHURCH STREET
IRON RLN AYR. NRST TO RLN )VIVUR I
mnn 11W.;Tfl ,, p.�,'I e-u.l �� n:. 5: kP I .:h - All. I
6SSESSNUT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MIITEIAICE DISTRICT 10. 4
COYOTE CANYON
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE
I
j�
a I
ff lam It 1. 91. 0143 I
i
I COYOTE CANYON
8
ELEM. SHOOL SITE
pu
e:8s:
sue Iff
%wig' __
L 6r1• ,
ASSESSA( DIAGEAA
LLEDSCIPE EIIETEE LICE DISTEICT E0, 4
R. NO. 13717
� o :
�\ ` rte..• \� >�
I �
- H
1
scs ITIMI sesoes Imes closes STSSS•
MLIONIT(1f000 LIDN.) ( G.
ST. (201T(9300 LAIN.) • p. 7 G.
Sr. LIm!T( 7500 LUN.) tE Na.
sr. TXMIS GAL.) 73 q. 30 Q. 10 G.
PASEWAT LANNOSCAPIM 17,700 s.►. 1.400 S. r, ].570 5
NoTL ALL OOANTMM SNCNN ASE WLT toll T(E
PASQMATS ADJACENT TO TRACT 100. 13717.
EXNIBI7 •A•
LANDSCAPE
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM DISTRICT No. a
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
3
i
i"
h
Il e�i'
GITT OF RANCHU CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA T' _c"1� `� �� —,
EA,8,i
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
COA'T/A'UED
04WLOW
L /M /TJ OW
A,,,.,ri,, If
/nu. MWIAN "WOCCI4114& (y, A60WAM. r I^fM1A0 AM•�
Pll use_ u, `
/ n
qaw ee.w� — as.ab �
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CUP e65-12
' STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ds
�•
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
(Tot Lot)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
na awe
ai.23i•93 y
Approved: _Ll,!7�r •.1' - �': -sC
William J.,O'Neil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
(Tot Lot Maintenance District)
Eisc 1 Year 97193
The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance
District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of
the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Bac o�,e• und•
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD #5) represents a landscaped 'Pot Lot, located an
the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. This site is associated with a group
of 44 single family parcels which all have a common usage of the Tot Cot such that any benefit
derived from the landscaping can be directly attributed to those particular parcels. Because of
this, assessments required for this district are charged to those specific parcels.
There is only one site maintained by the district. It consists of a Tot Lot and a small amount of
shrubs beds and ground cover. The quantities of maintained areas consist of:
21M 92M
Ground Cover and Shrubs 033 0.33
Total Area in LMD #5 0.33Acm 033 Acres
The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape
maintenance company.
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD 05 are for direct maintenance of ground cover and
shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and
testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #5 are as follows:
Regular Payroll
$80.00
Fringe Benefits
$30.00
Maintenance and Operations
$830.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
$70,00
Contingency Tree Replacement
$50.00
Contract Services
Landscape and Tree Maintenance
$2,470.00
Capital Expenditures
Playground Equipment& Fence Renovation
$15,1130.00
General Liability
$50.00
Water Utilities
$260,00
Electric Utilities
$130.(Nl
Subtotal:
$19,800.00
Assessrr�nt Administration and
General Overhead
$580.00
Delinquency Contingency
Gross Revenue Required: $20,730.00
Less: 91/92 District Carryover _ cS15.940.00
Total Revenue Required: M179000
For 92/93 the district budgeted $15,830.00 for playground equipment and fence renovation, these
funds are carryover from the current fiscal year budget. The Delinquency Contingency in an
amount of $350.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district.
Anal
In the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LMD W5 was $105,00 /A.U.,this will increase to $108.78
for the FY 92/93 to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. No new assessment units
were annexed into the district this year.
i'.i .n.r
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district.
Unit No. of Rate /.
1?ni Use Tvce Units Hal, Fact r AU. Reven_e
Single Family Parcel 44 $108.78 i.0 $108.78 4$ ,786.32
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 5
.1;
1
1
,
Qum 15Nawin.
mm wwm
i r�"r`"
<�1. NI CMLAee< _ 1 • AVE _
iM I YII I I
ll < I
� 1' � ICI eAeEU.c eo
I � I W .I W � � I •�
I < —
\
(LMTE BO mw
aln- n I�-� ■
MTPoCT BMW
CITY OF RANCHO CUC A
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 6
(Caryn Planned Community)
Approved:
Fiscal Year 1992/93
P /.2 -31 -93
William JF'(yNeil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 6
(Carya Planned Community)
fiscal Year 92193
The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned
Community ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 19712).
Bac cunde
Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (LMD #6) represents landscape sites throughout the
Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as
such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those
parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged
to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites in Caryn that are maintained by the district consist of parkways,
median islands, and paseos and . The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paws
are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the
Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew,
C7"1t1,'lSC�7S�R}I
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #6 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #6 are as follows:
91/92
22L.%i
Ground Cover and Shrubs
12.09
12.09
Turf
2.89
189
Community Trails
3.0➢
am
Total Area in LMD #6
17.89Acres
17.89Acres
The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paws
are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the
Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew,
C7"1t1,'lSC�7S�R}I
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #6 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #6 are as follows:
Regular Payroll
$8,HOO)
Fringe Benefits
$2,860.00
Maintenance and Operations
$9,920.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
$1,910.00
Contract Services
Landscape and Tree Maintenance
$180,000.00
Capital Expenditures
Irrigation Replacement
$2,510.00
Plant Material Renovation
$47,990.00
General Liability
$3,080.00
Water Utilities
$60,000.00
Electric Utilities
$1,540,04
Subtotal:
$317,990.00
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
$27,280.00
Delinquency Contingency
$27,740.Q0
Gross Revenue Required:
$373,010.00
Less: 91/92 District Carryover _
< $87340.00>
Total Revenue Required:
2870.00
For 92/93 the district budgeted $2,510 for irrigation replacement and $47,990 for plant material
renovation. The funds for this renovation come from the carryover of last fiscal year's district
budget. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency
Contingency in an amount of $27,740.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the
district.
Analysis,
In the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LIVID M6 was 235.48 /A.U.,this will increase to
$243.96/A.U. for the FY 92/93 to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. No new
assessments units were annexed into the district this year. 237 new assessment untis have been
added to the district.
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Rate /.
Land Use I= Units Rate Factor AU. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 1,171.00 243.96 1.0 $243.96 28$ 5.670.00
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 6
I
mum as= sae 11: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
� � �► SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
°� CALIFORNIA
`� v an um
® Vwn BMW
■ EW BMW
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
Approved:
(North Etiwanda)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
"Mom
o/a•3/-93 r
William [..O'Neil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
(Etiwanda North)
Fiscal Year 92191
The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.7 (Etiwanda North) is
prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets
and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Background
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD k7) represents landscape sites throughout the
Etiwanda North area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such
any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels
within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those
parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites in the Etiwanda North area that are maintained by the district
consist of parkways, median islands, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of
maintained areas is as follows:
The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and pawos
are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the
Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew.
Ergiected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD N7 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with (me maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD A7 are as follows:
21M
22M
Gmund Cover and Shrubs
6.16
7.46
Turf
2.21
3.55
Community Trails
L9g
2M
Total Area in LMD p7
9.9OAcres
13.OlAcres
The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and pawos
are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the
Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew.
Ergiected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD N7 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with (me maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD A7 are as follows:
Regular Payroll
$2,720.00
Fringe Benefits
$950.00
Maintenance and Operations
$10,420.00
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
$1,330.00
Contract Services
Landscape and Tree Maintenance
$137,490.00
Capital Expenditures
$0.00
General Liability
$2,950.00
Water Utilities
$16,030.00
Electric Utilities
$740.00
Subtotal:
$172,630.00
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
$27,580.00
Delinquency Contingency
Gross Revenue Required: $301,770.00
Less: 91/92 District Carryover _ s0,'lfl
Total Revenue Required: 1 770.00
For 92/93 the district budgeted no capital improvement projects and no funds were available for
carryover from last fiscal year's district budget. No vehicle or equipment purchases are
budgeted for Li 92/93. The Delinquency Contingency in an amount of $101,560.00, represents the
amount of unpaid taxes within the district.
Analysis;
In the FY 91/92 the assessment rate for LMD a7 was 305.434 /A.U.,this will not increase for the
FY 92/93. It is estimated the the present rate will cover the current maintenance costs of the
district. 237 new assessments units were annexed into the district.
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district
Unit No. of Rate /.
Land Use Tvne Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 988.00 $305.43 1.0 $305.43 $30L770.00
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 7
m um
Lail aw
man own
aum m mss ia m: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
"" """ SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
'," CALIFORNIA HOHM
LM 7
ANNEXATIONS
ANNEXED
NOVEMBER 6, 1991
TR 14139
120 AU
ANNEXED
NOVEMBER 6, 199:
TR 14380
79 AU
ANNEXED
NOVEMBER 6, 1991
TR 14379
35 AU
§
�
�
�
,
-
■ ■ ! �
- � ` ■ ` _ -
■ - m
■. °�� s
a2� ~ §
�`
§$ §�
a
s ■5
� E
§
� e 6
§
�Z 2
;!�I ;I ■!,
■ ■ ■ ■ &%
■ ._ ■
$ !
EMI
� +I
E\k�
§\k
2�
Lo
,
� d
, ¥R
, §<
! \
}
&
'a
e
■
�
■ ■ ■ ■ &%
■ ._ ■
$ !
EMI
� +I
E\k�
§\k
2�
Lo
,
� d
, ¥R
, §<
! \
}
ASSES. =Nr O/AGRAA/
4NOdfJIEYA.. ENANCE olsrolCr NO. 7
®orr mANW"
srmrr nuX AKA
"ENWNEENS, INC
�. yw N AW NMI- M�AL'1 =INY� yx�.
�IYN�
TRACT NO. 1s9B0
C/r.v OF
RANCHO CIICAMOVOA
rRACr NO. 14380
ABSESSA rNr D/AGRAm
LANOdG rC mT.:A'ANcl O/srRlcr MC
LEGEND
RANCHO CIICAA/OpVa4
ENGINEERS, INC
TRACTNO. two
..u..w �ww.,� «,.u. «.�w.ww•.
TO 9EC✓ NrAwiry
Br GAAVSCAPE
mANrENAACE
arr u Wfo
STREET TREE AREA
orr Ad4NrAMD
�ezwN
for . s
s•
/
6
7
/ 9
e
,/C
n♦
t�/ 10 \
8
�l
TRACE NO. min
arYOP'
RANCHO CIICAA/OpVa4
ENGINEERS, INC
TRACTNO. two
..u..w �ww.,� «,.u. «.�w.ww•.
4 fd
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8
(South Etiwanda)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
JAO SUE
Ph y
p0. 2053 a
* p 1.7 -3/•93 �
Approved: -
Willi O'Neil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8
(South Etiwanda Area)
The FY 92/93 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.8 (South Etiwanda Area) is
prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Street,
and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD q8) represents landscape sites throughout the
South Etiwanda area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such
any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels
within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those
parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites in the South Etiwanda area that are maintained by the district
consist of parkways, median islands, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of
maintained areas is as follows:
Ground Cover and Shrubs
Turf
Community Trails
Total Area in LMD 88
91/92
2"/
0.23
0.23
0.06
0.06
O.00
Om
0.29 Acres
029 Acres
The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, are maintained under
contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Ttails are
maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew.
Prelected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD M8 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD 09 are as follows:
Regular Payroll
Fringe Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
Contingency Tree Replacement
Contract Services
Capital Expenditures
Plant Material Renovation
General Liability
Water Utilities
Electric Utilities
Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Delinquency Contingency
Gross Revenue Required:
Less: 91/92 District Carryover
Total Revenue Required:
$2,970.00
$1,040.00
$2,630.00
$370.00
$840.00
$5,700.00
$3,910.00
$120.00
$710.00
$18,370.00
$1,760.00
$30.00
$20,160.00
<$3.910.00>
$16.250.00
For 92/93 the district budgeted $3,910.00 for plant nmovation as a capital improvement project,
funds for this renovation :ce carryover from last fiscal year's district budget. No vehicle or
equipment purchases are budgeted for in 92/93. The Delinquency Contingency in an amount of
$30.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district.
Analysis:
In the FY 91/92 the assessment rata for LMD A8 was $145.22 /A.U.,this rate will increase to
$150.45 for the FY 92/93. This inctease in the assessment rate is needed to cover the current
maintenance costs of the district. 35 new assessment units were added to the district.
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Rate /.
Land Use Tyne Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 108.00 $150.45 1.0 $150.45 1S 6,250.00
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 8
viol
� YILEtIe[ to i
YIISW AVE
i
♦
♦ eMTM T
♦ >I I YitxEMO<
i
—L
MtOY nYf
1
wDIY Li(14
NMWE OEM
0 MTBEW
mum a5 m m i<. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
cis SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY UM a FAWA "HIP
wm n. m CALIFORNIA
LMS
,1NWE IINS
MNE %E9 TRIW1 91`T515, 1992 75 AV
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 8
i
l
w
LEGEND
J DENOTES LANDSCAPE AREA
DENOTE' SIDEWALK
Q DENOTES STREET LIGHT
0 DENOTES ;REE°
7t -s-
• I •T, I. a. 9 r I a Is ♦ sl w 1 - 1 0 1 -
•
M
•
M
w w
w q
w w
M w
• It
r•ccI .360 3
CITY 0r ^!?t-�CHO CUCAMONGA
COUN ( : OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
w
y .
A�
7A 13945
VORT EXHIBIT
cut l'-Zool
C1t I UP HA_N(:fiU CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 17,1992
TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: William j. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer
Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION
FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93.
It is recommended that City Council hold the public hearing and approve the Annual Engineer's
Reports and Resolution establishing the assessment rates for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos.
1,2,3,4,5,6,7, and 8.
Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, electricity charges are
expected to increase for all districts due to a combination of a projected rate increase of over 9% by
Southern California Edison and in some districts an increase in the number of street lights being
maintained. Edison charges for traffic signals are also included in the applicable districts. In
addition, Operations and Maintenance charges for traffic signals, which in prior years were paid by
State Gas Tax funds, will also be borne by the applicable districts. In past years any available prior
year carryover was used to keep assessments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. In some
districts this carryover no longer exists resulting in an increase in the assessment rate. The following, in
conjunction with reference to the annual Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 92/93 rates as
compared with current FY 91/92 rates and justification for those proposed rates. The annual Engineer's
Reports identifies the required budget for each district and any carryover used to reduce rates.
A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to each district's budget to cover anticipated delinquencies
in tax payments. If the delinquencies are less than expected, funds within the district can be
transferred to cover expenditures.
St_ reel Lighting Ma' itenance District y4IL j: Art rial
An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $10.18 to $13.81 for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
This is primarily due to an mcreaw in Edison rates and inflation costs previously home by State Gas Tax
funds.
Street i htin Maintenance Distrl,t>y��_Ls2idj
An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $20.00 to $29.30 for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
Electricity costs are expected to increase by over $30,000,
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nu, 3: Victoria Planned Commurd
An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $20.00 to $29.74 for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
This increase is due to a projected increase in electricity costs.
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -I mVista Planned Community
An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $20.00 to $27.72 for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
Street lighting Maintenance Distrct Nmd -Can Planned Communi h�
An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $20.00 to $33.19 for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
Shcetl' htin Maintenance D strict rip, 6 :Commercial /Industrial
An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $20.00 to $31.21 for Fiscal Year 1992/93,
Street Lighting Maintenance District Ns, Z _ North Etiwandj
An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $32.16 to $33.32 for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nn, d _ Smith Etiwanda
An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $121.92 to $12631 for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of
street lights to assessment units. As more assessment units are annexed to the district it is expected that
the street light -to- assessment unit will be reduced thereby reducing the assessment rate.
Respectfully submri-tted /,
II /
William j. OiQeil
City Engineer
W)O.ws
Attachments: Resolution
Engineer's Reports
Iglu
RESOLUTION NO. 91 - 115-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1991/92 PURSUANT TO
THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 1 AND 8
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the
6th day of May, 1992, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 92 -150 to order
the therein described work in connection with Street Lighting Maintenance
District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which Resolution of Intention No.
92 -150 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required
by law shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention
on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered
evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this
proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the
benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired
jurisdiction to order the proposed work.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga th at the public interest and convenience requires the levy
and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1992/93, and said City Council
hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of
Intention No. 92 -150, be done and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the
Engineer siiee y� finally approved; and
SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal
Year 1992M a -n-T method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby
approved.
1011
Street Light Maintenance Districts Highlights
Street Lighting District 1- Attertal Streets
• Edison charges to the district for street lights and traffic signals has increased due
to an increase in electrical rates and the transfer of district electrical costs which in
prior years were paid for with State Gas Tax funds which are no longer available.
• 813 assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 12.65 %.
• 91/92 Rate = $10.18 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $13.82
Street Lighting District 2 - Local Streets
• Edison charges expected to increase by over $30,000
• 152 assessments have been added to the district.
Tax delinquency rate for the district is 1451 %.
91/92 Rate = $20.00 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $29.30
Street Lighting District 3 - Victoria Planned Community
• No assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 15.19 %.
• 91/92 Rate= $20.00 -Proposed 92/93 Rate= $29.74
Street Lighting District 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community
• 358 assessments have been added to the district.
Tar. delinquency rate for the district is 235 %.
91/92 Rate= $2000 - Proposed 92/93 Rate= $27.72
Street Lighting District 5 - Caryn Planned Community
• No assessments have been added to the district.
Tax delinquency rate for the district is 11.94 %.
• 91/92 Rate = $20.00 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $33.19
Street Lighting District 6- Commercial/Industrial
• 29 assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 1621 %.
• 91/92 Rate = $20.00 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $31.21
Street Lighting District 7- North Etiwanda
• 234 assessments have been added to the district.
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 42.20 %.
• 91/92 Rate = $32.16 - Proposed 92/93 Rate = $33.32
Street Lighting District 8- South Etiwanda
• 35 assessments have been added to the district.
• Prior to FY 92/93 only one property was in the district
• Tax delinquency rate for the district is 0%.
• 91/92 Rate = $121.92 - Proposed 92/93 Rate= $12631
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 1
(Arterial Streets)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
e�
J �e * .Firs /�• ?1.93 M
Approved:
WWia . O'Neil, CI
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1
(Arterial Streets)
The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) is prepared
in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and
Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Background-
Street
Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and /or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial street throughout the City.
The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to
benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the
maintenance and /or installation of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals
(or a portion thereof) on arterial streets.
Typically, sheet lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital
improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not
been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972.
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #1 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals. State Gas Tax funds have been used in the past for
Maintenance and Operations. These funds are no longer available Projected Maintenance and
Operations costs are increasing by nearly $30,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added
to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of
delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY
91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed tt:e projection, those funds
will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD
#1 are as follows:
Total Personnel
$0,00
Maintenance and Operations
$62,000.00
Contract Services
Traffic Signal Adjustment
$5,470.00
General Liability
$2,990.00
Electric Utilities
510823000
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
$178,690.00
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
$101,470.00
Delinquency Contingency
$21.790.00
Total Revenue Required:
$301,950.00
Less: FY 91 /92 Carryover
( $20.001
Assessment Revenue Required:
$301.930.00
The most significant impacts on the proposed FY 92/93 budget are the increase of Maintenance
and Operations of nearly $30,000 due to the elimination of a prior years State Gas Tax subsidy,
and the increase in electricity charges due to an Edison rate increase and an increase in the
number of street lights and traffic signals. 813 new assessment units have been annexed Into the
district.
FY 97/93 Assessment Rate;
For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $13.81. That is up $3.63 from the FY 91/92 rate of
$10.18. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
L3rtd Use I= I hits Rte Factor AIJ, Revenue
Commercial Acre 3,291.J7 $13.81 2 $27.62 $90,900.00
Single Family Parcel 15.291. $13.81 1 $13.81 $211,030,00
Total 18,572.07 $301130.00
,
,
CREATED 05 iUSE 1992 BY
RL URCE 4aVIM DEPIRTYm
(, l> BI11 :0
l;T1 of %i11i0 CC.AY: `tvA
j—,l) 9e, F'zr ;A)
Al'I'l l,' l' I-)IGH TIM' NMAIN` FINANCE MI 'TIIIC i I
,
,
cm WTs
USTRCT BWARY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY }
CALIFORNIA
SLDi
ANNEXATIONS
ANNEXED
NOVEMBER 10, 1991
26 AU
ANNEXED
FEBRUARY 20, 1991
DR
5 AU
ANNEXED
mAYR411W1
1,n AN
ANNEXED
MAY 15 1991
TR 1314
21 AU
ANNEXEC
NNE 19, 1991
PM 13820
27.74 AU
ANNEXED
SEPTEMBER 4, 1991
CUP 88 -28
1." AU
ANNEXED
SEPTEMBER 4, 1991
IN
B AU
ANNEXED
OCTOBER 16, 1991
CUP 91-11
2.38 AU
ANNEXED
NOVEMBER 6, 1991
TR 14139
120 AU
ANNEXED
NOVEMBER 6, 1991
T 14380
79 W
ANNEXED
NOVEMBER 6, 1991
OMBER
35 AU
ANNEXED
20, 1901
RHV033ER
118 AU
ANNEXED
NOOVEMBBER 20, 1991
197 AU
ANNEXED
8, 1991
DRCas-09
1,06 AU
AXXENFO
COYOTEBCAANYON EEEM6.88 AU
ANNEXE[
FEBRUARY 6, 1901
PH
2.0 Ml
ANNEXED
20, 1991
FEBRUARY
55 AU
ANNEXED
MARCH 1991
90 -05
9.06 AU
ANNEXED
MARCN 6 1991
TO 1335 -1
8 AU
ANNEXED
FEBRUARY 20, 1991
CUP 89.26
9.92 AU
ANNEXED
JANUARY 15, 1942
To
35 AU
ANNEXED
JANUARY 1992
315,
,93
ANNEXED
R2 19, 1992
DFEB89
R
6.4 M
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
LEGEND
® CITY HkINTAInD AREA
N.:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR 14197.1
um JT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
Q
W
M S
IN
SPRUCE
AVE.
Q
".%tai!
WHITE OAK
AVE
SITE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR Aq -21
EXHISIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOi A
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
-�
57/82 RAVE; 4VENU2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ��
r A-
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
® UTY MAINTAINED AREA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
r SR 13114
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
o :.visa
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
- -mss
rrr n
rc o_
h.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA pM ��aas
EkMIOIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
AM zoe- zel -to
I
.. I .. .1. .. n. ,.f ..
tout[vuo�
'I x
I
i�
QOAbrrITIES I 'I a PPD.7ECr
TREES — 3 { L=TILN
� ati�ar w
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CUP ee -ze
i STATE OF CALIFORNIA MALACHITE
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I
—4% som uomm z mr ulwr (tlr"m)
o 2AWALTRas MAWLATA
$TOM I CM WACN)
o Ll*J MqA[ ST *AE1fowA AMWWA0
maa m Cu'xw)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tic
COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO 1490
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 'A-
wSSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
Q
Vi
9595 LUCAS
N I I RANCH RA
J'
V
FpURTH STREE'i
-r -
57'1PE57' TREF - 2 Eq. N /CHCGN
5 rREET L 1611 T - NONE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
l COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
�` � S7ATE OF CALIFORNIA
"~—�' --
G V 0 N V oK
I b N n ♦ _ \�
b�
n n n
no _
x ooa�vis c
o' " naa pv
b A
1 t V V m f p N N
T < b m b b O
I st u "t
r
n
� e
UA � N p
^ a O n b + n b
H
M1
n n
i r
R�
6
O O N
gT. $
w N
N
LU
a s N
U 49 O
; N
Q{�QNs
J Jy
Q �
I
OM
gel
a�
cr-
t
LE D
o
DJ/JJ>)J saar.Nr�I�fD
Yii / //A STA?T 7�1T ME's
ASSES: =Hr O/AGRAAI
(A#""PE w.. , "AW" oarnar Na T
TRACT NO. l m8O
^° ^° arLAWN"
_ RANCHO C!
ENGINEERS, INC rRACr ��JJ-• -iv
®II
e
7
/o
/r\m �
ze /1 i
2J w
/e
l io
24 I /r
JI
�/�I1/1�� fNGINEER9. INC
TRACT NO. 14370
C /TYO Or
RANCHO C//CAMONCA
rRACT NO. us"
7 -J-A' GEA mau.. 7r. 790
ASSESSAIE,Vr D /AGRAm
uvVSc frAavrcv urctaarwicr,vc
LEGEND
AAVSURE AREAS
To BE MANTANED
6Y CANOSCARE
NANTENANCE
GYSrRYr
srREEr raEara/aiAA
lr5i
Nw"
AdMUN Aem
e
7
/o
/r\m �
ze /1 i
2J w
/e
l io
24 I /r
JI
�/�I1/1�� fNGINEER9. INC
TRACT NO. 14370
C /TYO Or
RANCHO C//CAMONCA
rRACT NO. us"
7 -J-A' GEA mau.. 7r. 790
EXHIBIT •A•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
1 -r-
1 �`r -.-.
-VISTA
PIJIRMAY
U
11 >� "Taxcw No 13351
11 6 11 ✓
Y:
Y J...
/- J
W%OlCAAC ARRA ' 6119 S.T.
1SS15N11! DIlGull
61IDSC1P1 11I121111CI DISRIC! 10. 4
TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ( TRACT NO. 13351 )
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
rR lsgF,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ASSHSSNBIf DIAGIAN- LAIOSC
NAINf$IAICI DISf1ICT 10. 4
WEST GREENWAY TRAIL
( t01. PCL. 2, P.N. 14195 )
QUANTITIES
/ TOTAL LAM06CAPR AREA : 13,500 S.P.
I HARDSCAPE AREA : 9,120 S. Jr.
-� GROIIHD COYER AREA ; 4,300 S.F.
j 6" THICK SryRRDDED MULCH )
5 GAL. SHRUBS ; 469 EA.
lim. t
rOR. LOT 1. Tn. RIO. 1302
—_ZZ Ica- ,- - 100•
M. M. lane
wcl.. a
a
w
u
ISSBSSNI.. DIIC1►N
LINDSCIP1 1111TRIANCE DISTIICT 10. 4
CHURCH STREET
w
0
ry
4
IRON 1LN AVE. NEST TO BLN IYNNUH N
M
e1 To II.n : TIC.,`71 CF U'1 ;l ..'- 0.1 -9� o;. S; 1N Ch 9V -I
Y
ks
I�
�I
AS:BSSN(
DIAGRAM
` L"DSCAPI NIIITIHIICE DISTRICT 10. 4
TR. NO.
137117
3 G,
ST. Lxwr(5R00 LAN.) 13 q,
ST. TRIMIS CAL.) 77 EA.
so RA.
[W 11110[ Moci kilns OWN sylld
W.LIMM6860 LAN.)
1 a.
ST.L.IMTtls00 LLRI.)
i a.
3 G,
ST. Lxwr(5R00 LAN.) 13 q,
ST. TRIMIS CAL.) 77 EA.
so RA.
10 EA.
PARRMAY LANOSCA►INO 17.300 S.I.
1, 400 3, op.
7.570 5
NOTL ALL OUANrME3 SNOMN ARE OWLY
MR THE
PARKWAYS AWACJNr 70 TRACT N0.
13717.
EXHIBIT "A"
2 7F
I :,SESSMENT DIACF .M
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
ELM AVVNuc
,re�tow Rau'
Y�
Rti
ASSESSDEH'Z' DUGUR
UNDSCBPE AIIHTEIUCE DISTRICT 10. 4
COYOTE CANYON
I ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE
I
I `m �j'777j %TT i7777i7T�77T T'%%`7777iL7 =r%
a 1
men at e. 1. 111.1
iCOYOTE CANYON I
8 i ELEM. SHOOL SITE
L
' IV
QCG!Nr/r /es
VA40 Soo &4-
EXHUNT -A-
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
- -- - - -- -- -------- j
1 ,
Ell W
e. ... a.,.� .. '
If�ilr, �
I
LEGEND
Existing Homes
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PMIiII�
.. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT •A•
ALSSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
34 40 141 1 42143 1 44 1 45 46 47 148149 50
5
38 1
37 52
36 24 23 10 A 53
25 22 11 54
35 26 21 12
1 34 27 20 13 6
1 33 26 19 14 5 1
32 29 18 15 4
31 30 17 16 3 2
LEGEND
®CITY MAINTAINED
AREAS
wm-lr.lj , i�&
s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR. 3703
EXMOIT W
` ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
i LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.8
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
517E
i_ i4 W NTN S KkMr i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
J` r'
l STATE OF CALIFORNIA oa so-os
Ex.41i1i --A.
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
7LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
7P 33s/-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
.A.
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
STREET G /GNTS
STREET 7REE5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
� �yP B9 -2E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
M'iY w0
i
t
r
LEGEND
I DENOTES LANDSCAPE AREA
DENOTES SIDEWALK
DENOTES STREET LIGHT
DENOTES TREES
DISTRICT -
a
M
M
M M
II It
M Il
M M
� u
I ii c1 136 6 3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
71i 13945
�1 EMS11BiT
5[4[ � X200
•
A
M
i
i
i
1
■a
[
i
V
�d
�
♦
N
71i 13945
�1 EMS11BiT
5[4[ � X200
.� EI.FI81T '�'� Fdesoluti� No. 92-014
Page 7
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM j
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 6
e
•:
i
S
�'t RPi EC-
StCE
_t wiri 4
,rMl�
CITY O! RANCHO Cut"""
COUNTY Or 'SAN 89MMANDINO
ate.:
STATE OP CALIFORNIA
E. MiBIT •A' Re lutiM No. 92 -043
ASSESSMEM T DIAGRAM page 3
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 5
NlIV79 ST
°
N
!889 _ P: 2fi1
FERON
o�
LEGENO v to
STREET UGHTS / EA
/5600 J °°6�j
STREET T7 REES 9E4
PYt°US C.9LCERYA71A
C3TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
`r COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STAVE OF CALIFORNIA OR�9 i2
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 2
(Local Streets)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
3AO !
� N0.11D63 s
yF
Approved: Je-�Irte � l
William J eil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 2
(Local Streets)
The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is
prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets
and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
I}adW211111
Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD p2) is used to fund the maintenance and /or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local street throughout the City but
excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses
the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the
facilities in this district benefit this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals
(or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital
improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not
been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972.
Proiected.Q4sts
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD N2 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $110,000. A Delinquency Contingency
amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected
amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon
actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92,193 exceed the projection,
those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and
maintain SLD u2 are as follows:
Proposed Maintenance Budeet for 1992193
Total Personnel
$10,460.00
Maintenance and Operations
$5,000,00
Contract Services
Traffic Signal Adjustment
$9,870.00
General Liability
$1,800.00
Electric Utilities
8113,53000
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
$140,660.00
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
$40,030.00
Delinquency Contingency
11187000
Total Revenue Required:
$192560.00
Less: FY 91/92 Carryover
C $14.620.00)
Assessment Revenue Required:
$177,940.00
Analysis:
The most significant impact on the proposed FY 92/93 budget is the increase in electricity costs
of over $3,000 to a projected annual cost of over $110,000. In past years the assessment rate had
been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the
case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. 152 new assessment units have been
annexed into the district.
For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $2930. That is up $930 from the FY 91 /92 rate of
$20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
Lad Use Typ UnL9 Ram Factor Ate. Revenue
Commercial Acre 318.52 $29.30 2 $58.60 $18,670.00
Single Family Parcel 5.435,E $29.30 1 $29.30 $159,270.00
Total 5,754.52 $177,940.00
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 2
z�
1w
1
E. . =J
MAW O5 AN W By
RWf18 SNR' M WOW
G7S WM RA
M MAMA
(7H 9W WYL W 250
vIL50v S
. 1
r
ulo `
yl
1 �
- 1
11111 I�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
11014 MY Lim
NI ILBRA7E NWARr
HILLSIG
,, •MlIJ1�
1
C
_
z�
1w
1
E. . =J
MAW O5 AN W By
RWf18 SNR' M WOW
G7S WM RA
M MAMA
(7H 9W WYL W 250
vIL50v S
. 1
r
ulo `
yl
1 �
- 1
11111 I�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
11014 MY Lim
NI ILBRA7E NWARr
BLD2
ANNEMTIDN5
ANNEXED
NOVEMBER 20,
1991
TR 14192 -1
26 AU
ANNEXED
MAY IS 1991
TR 13114
21 AU
ANNEXED
SEPTEMBER 4,
1991
TR 14866
47 AU
ANNEXED
SEPTEMBER 4,
1991
CUP 88 ^28
1.04 AU
ANNEXED
FEBRUARY 6,
1991
PM 13113
2.0 AU
ANNEXED
FEBRUARY 20,
1991
TR
55 AU
tAn191T •A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA rR 14192
Ex Hialr 'w
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
s
® CITY MNNTAINW AREA
I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
7
i
ASSESSMENT DIAL -RAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I
�64CLID
A it --ww "wxs 47Aw 4i*mr of meu)
O fJLALY"dtl MAIM14AT14
CMW mg (41 sAcu)
O uAlicomwAs ST"ACIFOUA flNmvAl'
sTgm Tm Cif Geu)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I T7,44-
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO i4BL�
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
QUANTITIES
TRMS — 3
� EXn1e�T •,•,• (-
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
AM 208- 261 -20
I
� s I
r•
II
wn i. w
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
4�,\ STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
EXMI &T 'A' - - - -�
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1
STREET LIGHTING LWNTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
_- �---- ----- ------ - - -
c -
•1 }
� I
I W '. ' ° `I� S
QC -
o »r �
I � ..__ear.. �sa.w`I � al •�N.
Wi _
i
LEGEND
Existing Homes
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
-, PM 13113
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
&5SESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
39 40 141
38
37
LEGEND
®CITY MAINTAINED
AREAS
42 43 44 45 46 47 48
23
2 4
36
9
8
7
6
5
4
22
25
20
26
35
34
i
27
33
28
32
29
31
30
LEGEND
®CITY MAINTAINED
AREAS
42 43 44 45 46 47 48
23
10
11
12
13
14
15
9
8
7
6
5
4
22
21
20
19
18
1
17 ,,-J 16 I 3 �,_J 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
r' TR. 13703
�. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Engineers
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Liizht District No. 3
(Victoria Planned Community)
Year 1992/93
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 3
(Victoria Planned Community)
The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned
Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
3 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Backitround:
Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and /or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned
Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel,
south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Ebwanda Avenue. it has been
determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the
City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals
(or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital
improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not
been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972.
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #3 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $70,000. A Delinquency Contingency
amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected
amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon
actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed Lhe projection,
those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and
maintain SLD #3 are as follows:
Total Personnel
Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Signal Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Delinquency Contingency
Total Revenue Required:
Add: Deficit Recovery
Assessment Revenue Required:
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,170.00
S70,660.00
$71,830.00
$27,800.00
$8.370.00
$108,000.00
$9.990.00
$117,990.00
Anaysm
The assessment rate for this district reflects an inflationary increase in costs. However, in past
years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In
future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. No
new assessment units have been annexed into the district.
For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $29.74. That is up $9.74 from the FY 91/92 rate of
$20.10. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
fad Use Tvne U'ts Rate Factor A.0 Revenue
Commercial Acre 98.26 $29.74 2 $59.48 $5,840.00
Single Family Parcel 3,771,40 $29.74 1 $29.74 $112.150.00
Total 3,869.26 117 990_00
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 3
4
aeto as=wer:
== DWAAW
am DIMM
M Or OU a
21
7�
MYl
I
_ Si II
II
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
e e
e e
� e
r
1 /J }J MV
NII L —IJ
Vre
® (U Nh BUM
e
e
NILLSIOE
ND
e
I
YI ts011 _erE e
DAN IAN
_
i
�II
NIONLAND<
,a
I
1
I
4
aeto as=wer:
== DWAAW
am DIMM
M Or OU a
21
7�
MYl
I
_ Si II
II
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
e e
e e
� e
r
1 /J }J MV
NII L —IJ
Vre
® (U Nh BUM
e
e
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 4
(Terra Vista Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
e�
Joserh y
a
No "
. sws�
Approved: lc k
William J. O' Mil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 4
(Terra Vista Planned Community)
The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra 'Vista Planned
Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Bac ound-
Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD 44) is used to fund the maintenance and!or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned
Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south
of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. it has been
determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the
City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals
(or a portion thereol) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
projects approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital
improvement project Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not
been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972.
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD N4 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $50,000. However, this amount is down
by about $3,000 from IFY 91/92. Other costs are down (Maintenance and Operations down
$40,000) in order to keep costs in line with the assessment rate of $27.72. The reason for this
will be discussed below in the Analysis section of the report. A Delinquency Contingency
amount is added to anive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected
amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon
actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection,
those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and
maintain SLD X4 are as follows:
Total Personnel
Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Signal Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Delinquency Contingency
Total Revenue Required:
Less: FY 91/92 Carryover
Assessment Revenue Required:
$58,160.00
$10,000.00
$5,00.00
$810.00
S47.270D0
$121,240.00
$17,360.00
51.190.00
$139,790.00
( $41200001
$108590.00
Analysis;
There are no substantial increases in the district's budget which exceed the inflation rate.
However, in past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State
Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's
assessment rate. $31,200 of the district's fund balance will be used to reduce the assessment
revenue required thereby keeping the assessment rate lower at $27.72 per assessment unit. 358
new assessment units have been annexed into the district.
For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $27.72. That is up $7.72 from the FY 91/92 rate of
$20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
f. � Use _ IWC Units Rate Facmr All Revenue
Commercial Acre 892.59 $27.72 2 $55.44 $49,490.00
Single Family Parcel 213200 $27.72 1 $27.72 $59100.00
Total 3,024.59 $108-90.00
STREET FIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIS`hRIC`I' 4
CRAM 05 IIBR = BY
K of bw61 GAMMA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
ny LIM
SMT 01OA1tY
SL04
AMMESATIOMS
AMgE%m
A JUNE 19 l3aH 1991
27.74 w
A nm
20, 1991
TM09�E"
71a AU
AMME %m
20, 1991
T�ST1T
197 AU
AMME %m
WTOTTMECAMTW ELD
6.W W
AMMESEO
MAACH 5i-1 "1
TR
a All
-- EXHIBIT •A•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
7 YIiO
L�
�1
f
IJJJI
E4
—jy`
fl,`'T _
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
OM t �aa.S
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
• �—,,
Icy
/�L
'f
7 YIiO
L�
�1
f
IJJJI
E4
—jy`
fl,`'T _
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
OM t �aa.S
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT •A•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
� I
TERM "sTh
T"CT Tic 133Si
W 1'6 1
m 4,
n_voue L. V0 Ar Mew : exte s,r.
iSSSS111! NOUN
UlDSCill 11IITIIi1Cl Dlsilicy 10. 1
TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ( TRACT NO. 13351 )
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
r
ISSRSSNRIT DIIGRIN-UNDSC NAIITRUICR DISTRICT 10. 4
WEST GREENWAY TRAIL
FOR. PCB. 24 P.N. 10295
QUANTITIES
/TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA : 13.500 S.F.
/ HAUDSCAPR AREA : 9.120 S.F.
GR011ND COVER AREA 4,300 S.F.
4" THICK SHREDDED MULCH
5 GAL_ SHUUIIS : 469 EA
MC1.. 4
rm. uw 1. T6. MO. 2202
__27 wJA . 1-11W —
M. M. 10296
0
a
a
M
F�
FC1.. 2
44
ASSRSSNR ►. DIAGRAN
LANDSC ►PE N►INTENANCR DISTRICT NO. 4
CHURCH STREET
r�
w
O
N
PRON ELN ►VE. NEST TO ELN AVENUE H
M
Iln Y1:•1 i0 I1" :ll!;..'P rf 0',' .V .'.�-U,
�I
ASSISSN( 01AGIAR
LdI05CAP6 IIIITINAICB DISTIICT 10. 1
TR. NO. 13717
ILII Unit Sr11ct 111191 Ct9tCt SH111'
fT. LIOIIT(1R000 LAIN.) 1 IA. —�
ST. LIO*T(ES00 UN.) { RA. 3 EA.
ST. LIOITT(5m LUX.) 17 CA,
sr. TRm( 1 S GILL.) 73 u. 50 W 18 u.
►ARRMAE LANDSWING 17,300 S.T. 91400 S.F. 3.570 S
MO'T[ ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE ONLY FOR THE
PARKWAYS ADJACLTT TO TNA= NQ. 13717.
EYH!SIT
ISSESSNUT DIIGUR
LIRDSCIPE UIRTERIRCE DISTRICT 10. 4
COYOTE CANYON
IELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE
I� --- %ERR^ visrn rw<dKwny
roai.q.
�, � -' �7T ,�JT/]�/i7?777i/717J777777i��
rueati a, r. 0. ooea i
z ICOYOTE CANYON
8 ELEM. SHOOL SITE
I I
OUhNT /T/GS
7WR(m Soo s.r
r^ers L 4A
&h;bd 4
�F/
J �
EXHIBIT
NT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE SSESSME MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
STREET LIGHING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
IL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STAT9 OF CALIFORNIA T-p
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 5
(Caryn Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
i► 10
¢ p /.7 3/'93
Approved:
William J. Meil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 5
(Caryn Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 92/93
The Fi 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned
Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Backvrouud•
Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD 45 is used to fund the maintenance and /or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community.
Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan
Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that
the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals
(or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital
improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not
been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972.
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD p5 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $27,000. While this amount is up
compared to FY 91/92, the overall operating budget is down by over $2,000 in order to keep costs
in line with the assessment rate of $33.19. The reason for this will be discussed below in the
Analysis section of the report. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the
Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax
payments which is anticipated m occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91 /92 tax receipts.
Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, those funds will be transferred
into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD N5 are as follows:
Pr po d MilintenAnce B dyel for 1992/93
Total Personnel
Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Signal Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Delinquency Contingency
Total Revenue Required:
Less: FY 91/92 Carryover
Assessment Revenue Required:
$0.00
$12,780.00
$0.00
$520.00
$27.33000
$40,030.00
$8,790.00
$2,730.00
$52,150.00
(
513,220,00)
$38 930.00
Analysis•
Projected increases in electricity charges as mentioned above has the most significant impact on
the increase in the assessment rate. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by
the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such
will affect the district's assessment rate. $13,220 of the district's fund balance will be used to
reduce the assessment revenue required thereby keeping the assessment rate lower at $33.19 per
assessment unit. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district
For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $33.19. That is up $13.19 from the FY 91/92 rate of
$20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
Single Family Parcel 1,173,00 $33.19 1 $33.19
Total 1,173.00
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 5
job
�_ MILESIpE I
� •�Mi,V1� _
1 1
1e
l�lh
sons wm w os Arw
pf or 10 NCA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
• M
OWYE eaim
�L /!VJI
. q5w mttw
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 6
(Commercial/Industrial)
Approved:
Fiscal Year 1992/93
City
Ma 24M
P/Z -3/ -93
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6
(Commercialllndustrial)
The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6
(Commercial/ Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter
1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Califomid (Landscape and Lighting
Act of 1972).
Ba< og>• und:
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD p6) is used to fund the maintenance and /or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets
throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district.
Generally this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has
been determined that the facilities within this district benefit this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets
and traffic signals (or a portion thereoQ on industrial or commercial streets generally south of
Foothill Boulevard.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital
improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not
been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972.
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD 86 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $10,000. A Delinquency Contingency
amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected
amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon
actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection,
those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and
maintain SLD 116 are as follows:
Prep sed Mainignalue Budget bg_ 1992193
Total Personnel
$7,860.00
Maintenance and Operations
$2,500,00
Contract Services
Acre
Traffic Signal Adjustment
$6560.00
General Liability
$250.00
Electric Utilities
$10,450.00
Capital Improvements:
Street Light Installation
313000
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
$30,770.00
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
$3,720.00
Delinquency Contingency
$1950,00
Total Revenue Required:
$36,440.00
Less: FY 91/92 Carryover
( $9.870 001
Assessment Revenue Required
$26570.00
Analysis:
There are no significant increases in the budget beyond inflation. In past years the assessment
rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will
not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rave. $9,870 of the district's fund
balance will be used to reduce the assessment revenue required thereby leaping the assessment
rate lower at $31.21 per assessment unit. 29 new assessment units have peen annexed into the
district.
IYL•A -gy.mBrung
For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $31.21. That is up $11.21 from the FY 91/92 rate of
$20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
1+? Lls?
Unit
Tyne
No. of Unit
Rate/
Single Family
Acre
1.,+'h Rate Fador
gjj,gj $31.21 1
A L_ Revenue
$31.21 $26570,00
Total
851.41
$26570.00
C4Bdm 05 RE 1■? BT:
DWM
pT OF A.Im CUCAWBCA
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 6
.1,
e �
LIME
RD
wit SUN AVE '
BAMTAM� _
T
,' <I XI GKOD<
i
"now XYT
I` 11
< XD
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
� r
M Lim
INutwh BMW
0 ENT BMW
IT
SLD6
ANNEXATIONS
ANNEXED
MAY 5 1991
N 7411
1.17 AU
ANNEXED
OQOBER 16,
1991
NR 91.11
2.35 AU
ANNEXED
DECEMBER 16,
1991
OR 88 -09
1.06 AU
ANNEXED
FEBRUARY 20,
1991
cio N9 -26
9.92 AU
ANNEXED
MARCH 20, 1991
DR 90-05
9.06 AU
ANNEXED
JANUARY 15,
1992
OR 89 -13
.93 AU
ANNEXED
FEBRUARY 19,
1992
DR 89-12
4.4 AU
A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND B
EXHIBIT •A•
raSSESSMENT DIAGRAM j
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
01
01
V�
Z
�I I 9595 LUCAS
RAACfi RO
U
v
I
FOUPTS SrREc r
-r LZ -
NO. O" ErREBr rif'6-:S - 2 EA, E(/C.411,4,rUS N /CNOZ /✓
5rREE7' L/Gf/T - NONE
J
T
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATF. OF CALIFORNIA
CUP .9/ -/i
I SESSMENT DIAGR M
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
ELM AVENUE
v I
i�
a/ Z E� St7(CtT1XEES
^fltow R4007r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
C -� H6 -OS
Lv STATs OF CAL37ORNIA
.A.
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CUP 89 -26
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT •A•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND B
-5/75
I
?LRG4l. 'D
ZiF
Yn ✓
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
OR 90-05
i STATE OF CALIFORNIA
a
� C
i
?LRG4l. 'D
ZiF
Yn ✓
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
OR 90-05
i STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EAMIelT •a• - "" —�
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 6
S �
M
t= \ 1
/T LLL I
I. 1
?RaEGT
51TE
M.� a
k f
CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMON"
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
OR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Tmi ':7
I
i
EXHEIT
ASSESSk35 ,MT WAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
N INTH ST
ILI, _
jl
�I I
I
o Drill � ll JJD
o y
°
Rv 28i
JP
FERON
a
D10 a s q
0
LEGEND
STREET LIGHTS / BA
4Sg00 LJ ♦p
STREET TREES 9,F4 I16�
PrleelS tALLERY4 A
%B1f"4 ^0AR10J
C3TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
L,F 89 -12
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 7
Approved:
(North Etiwanda)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
Na apse
William J. ONeil, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 7
(North Etiwanda)
Fiscal Year 92/93
The FY 92/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is
prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets
and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
flac Around:
Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD q7) is used to fund the maintenance and /or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the
North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of
Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City.
It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this
area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals
(or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital
improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not
been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972.
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLID N7 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street light, and traffic signals in the amount of over $11,000. A Delinquency Contingency
amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected
amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon
actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection,
those funds will be transterred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and
maintain SLID 07 are as follows:
4 u n' EJIETM
Total Personnel
Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Traffic Signal Adjustment
General Liability
Electric Utilities
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Delinquency Contingency
Assessment Revenue Required
$0.00
$200.00
$0.00
$200.00
S11,770.
$12,170.00
$6,450.00
$1410,00
$20,030.00
The increase in electricity costs is due to a projected increase in Edison charges along with an
increase in the number of street lights being taken over for maintenance. No fund balance
carryover is available to reduce the assessment rate from $305.43. A high delinquency rate of
42.20% has a significant impact on the cash Flow required to maintain the district. 234 new
assessment units have been annexed into the district
For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $33.32. That is up $1.16 from the FY 91/92 rate of
$32.16. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
Land.Use Type Units Rate Facbm A.U.
Single Family Parcel 601.00 $33.32 1 $33.32
Total 601.00
STREET
LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT
7
XILL90E L AO
VILSOX AYE
1 ,
• BAM Y.YY
XISXLAVO`
�19iH1 I I 1
<1
it I 1
• IASELI_YE_ -111-
_ 110
•�■y^_-Illi IIT 'IIIT`'If ''IIT
1 1 �I AI it CI
Q EOOIXILL BLYB
MIIOV MVY
•
• 61X_ $1
I�� C" Lm
N1 LLTWTE MW
— —j ■ orstRCT BMW
•
CRAM 05 AM 19W BY. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
�o A SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
wat UT 2" CALIFORNIA
s! D7
ANNEXATIONS
ANNEXED
Hp9fl ER 6,
1991
120 AU
ANNEXED
NOVEMBER 6,
1991
TR 14380
79 AU
ANNEXED
NOVEMBER 6,
1991
TR 1439
35 AU
-s-
N.T.S. 31 35 36 45 46 4r H49 50 -] 44 •AV
37 43
33 39 42
70 69 68 x 51
72 41 —
79 71 °
LANDSCAPE WEDEAS TD 31 — .0 52
BE MANTA Ely 72 Y � Y 67 W w
DISH f"CT.PE MAWTENANCE 30 0AO r 77 as
IBK�
22 1 21
29 100 99
85
66 r w
101
9a
54
2e 102
74
a4
a
87
27 IOJ 114 116
97
75
65 55
IQ
26 104 '116
93
r 99 64 `
112
25 IOS
96 z
76
a2
° 56
99 u i
117
63
a
24 106 111
95
77
ai
90 z 57 3
62
Ile
z � r
23 107
IOe 109 110 `
94
7e
a0
z 91 61 a 58
119
93
r W
3 Y
79
x 92 60 ° 59
AI ° E
19 is 17
16 15 14 13 12 11
10 9
e
7 6
5 4 3 2
•� 1. A•'1 A•1'�• „- .I. :!WA. o
1 1 µ�'. T
CITY OF
- ..•.._.......,
,. _ _
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TRACT NO. 14139 J
a ASSESSAI! -O /AC. ?AM
'
9r�►rrr4AWnA'QAWW. "'rot rw�crNa/ar II
� 16 IJ
1I •'
JO • JB Jy
?B
! �2 Jv
/ JJ �9
26 �J
J6 d
Z
ep
J 6J
J! 60 6�
I •i
2J is, f t A \ as
2t � !J
2Y
I 1p d !I
r2 Rr
\\ \\ J \ b
\
LEGEND
. JBOO cu6v SC A 17 Hu SYG
srRCEr C.6Nr
0 9700 LG.Er/ IUNI'ENAAtX
asnwr
I "'ENGINEERS. INC
Imo,_
�\ \ t \ J
1 � IO
^ \\ \ 9 \
•� ,y l
arY OF /PANCNO CUCAmoNGA
SrRgrrudwrlm0
MA /NrfAGMCf fXN/O/r
rRACrso. miss
ww., watt
7J -A' CE6 if. 90qJ:
ASSESSMENT D/AGRAA.
srnarrLmN nNoruvrkwANceoarRicr,vo. �A7
"ENGM[ERS. MC
C17-Y OF RANCHO C41CAMONGA
STRET L /QNT/NO
MA /NPENEANCE EXN /0/T
TRACT NO. mvp
7 -J•
Si.
E:�r
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Street Light District No. 8
(South Etiwanda)
Fiscal Year 1992/93
T J
NM 2OW r
Approved: " CC
William J. O' il, City Engineer
"W
Coca et ort tto $
4�atc . eei se oP tittt \e
C�t}t°�oa\ *,V'00' eo Wsc, �r�an5 �Q VI
F+ t Eti Jtb �e
Stteettt�b l�o�tb ate °n5 of
Yt't
'kavO P ht
tt d a m6 Pct of tqr\
_nt at to< "G¢ 1. temp dSCaPe �ont oas teem east of be
�annUanceP�� 04 Ca \�f °c°`a to f, nde"'e :n a Of 0`e e '`,`W et,t
e F'f q2`n CO Cie State \s ash \ocaas�,nes S`Nard PS \s d sK`tt
q91 on
'O`eQac�,Nay` 6l5\'O gated entCm4 Ot tNt rLO u`
Q d txi�' No. \s area "o, a tac\ ttatttt'
an ptstncvatfK eta d°Sd, an ed mat th t
Nta ntee \ °¢arts¢ ry or e J \eae�<mtn ,n,'tel ... t a deve \oQay"' %
Str °n of da
STI, atean °t x\ o \ o��E ' of sn °tt`E �•va " a t °nd\ t °° °ass Ats nd'aQe
insta S6t 9 P enoe. of J•e s ate> t rte �t as toPtnen tratt`te� tt�e4�
p Qe�¢5 W `mac Q onk e `i is by P'% �oc END
'0 S,` s Pe�mtrd� JcA
SR`t eF t�a"�e e°gnt�ra t` tvs�sif nas,�N_vee t, Po 't �ted
\° ttee a \. tPtSt° t0�`' ent'� . aQe \ JQon
,\yQ�c�`s aep t Qtn\S,leetv`�'n \rl �q'bas�o
Pmpto"nded Pci of \q� p5 is tOl it+� tt�eA6o'Ap yed to operate an
been t;tP�'nn6 tot 5 \� t °t n W to ottot g11g3 x rusts to
and red costsse ¢Re4�ttzd \QatedM tot,( Qtote`ttA
,C9 ttte bod6et�t� \s ¢Rev w�`itoa \teb d6ek.
"libc e zt d'.R,en�' the a aituns
,me n"'`gttts aged ton tax Q� 7 5t+°otie oPet
sttCeJntt,i �ettn4"`xton ertedsn
a �oont Y q tl 9d \he rtes tOt \ow
i aadJa\ t,oc\5 WO q9 ate
m°ante'Ot'
t
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Street Light Maintenance District No. 8
(South Etiwanda)
The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is
prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets
and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Back¢vwid,
Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and /or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the
South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of
Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the
incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit
the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals
(or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area.
Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development
project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital
improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not
been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972.
The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #8 is for electricity charges for the power to the
street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $4,000. A Delinquency Contingency
amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected
amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon
actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection,
those funds will be transferred into the operations budget. The projected costs to operate and
maintain SLD #8 are as follows:
&91!2kgd M4111tenanCe Rrldett for 199D93
Total Personnel
$000
Maintenance and Operations
$130.00
Contract Services
3¢,gf $126.31
36.00
Traffic Signal Adjustment
$0.00
General Liability
$50.00
Electric Utilities
$386000
Operations and Capital Subtotal:
$4,040.00
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
$520.00
Assessment Revenue Required
$4,560,00
Analysis:
In FY 91/92 there was only one parcel paying into SLD k8. It has been determined that, with
the inclusion of 35 additional parcels into the district and the accompanying street lights, the
unit cost will still be approximately the same resulting in an assessment rate of over $125. 35
new assessment units have been annexed into the district.
For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $126.31. That is up $4.39 from the FY 91/92 rate of
$121.92 due to the above stated reasons. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the
district:
Unit
Tyne
No. of
Units Bale
Unit
Factor
Rate/
A 1 Revenue
Parcel
3¢,gf $126.31
36.00
1
$126.31 $Q,j[j.
$560.00
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 8
1
LSD. ArE 1
Av - -a
IANf.1N -
• I w i
11 XI GxLAND i AvE
19Tx
I Iv
1 < lI-INE M
EoorxuL u9D
:1 LLi01E BgIQ9if
' • i
. 'NN -.� � SCI BQIItARI
CR+M C5 = IN By CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4wim
�°�'� SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
Gis Kim or um W. ' CALIFORNIA
SLUE
OWWTIUMS
ANNEMED JT15, 1992
5 35 9Jl
ASSESSMENT DIAGRA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
y-[y�MwO +C
i
t
LEGEND
I DENOTES LANDSCAPE AREA
i DENOTES SIDEWALK
nj DENOTES STREET LIGHT
0 DENOTES TREES
i I i i i M
It.e. .1663
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORMA
TA 1]945
ART EXHIBIT
ME -Zuol
1
V
1
e
t
•
e
TA 1]945
ART EXHIBIT
ME -Zuol
U1'1'X US HANUHU UUUAiMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Y
DATE: June 17, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 -
JAMES PAGE - Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of
a request to expand the hours of operation on Fridays for
an existing 103,552 square foot indoor wholesale /retail
commercial use located within the General Industrial
District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan
at 11530 Sixth Street - APR: 229 - 262 -28.
This item was continued to the June 17, 1992 City Council meeting
because the applicant was unable to attend the previous City Council
meeting on June 3.
Respect submitted,
Brad er
City P anner
BB:DC: sp
Attachments: June 3, 1992 City Council Staff Report
Resolution of Denial
C1'1'Y OP' RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 1992
TJ: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Huller, City Planner
BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 -
JAMES PAGE - Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of
a request to expand the hours of operation on Fridays for
an existing 103,552 square foot indoor wholesale /retail
commercial use located within the General Industrial
District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan
at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -28.
RHCOWWDATION: The planning Commission recommends denial of the
expansion of hours for Conditional Use Permit 91 -03 through adoption of
the attached Resolution.
BACKGROUND: On June 19, 1991, the City Council approved Industrial
Specific Plan Amendment 91 -D3 to conditionally permit Indoor
Wholesale /Retail Commercial Uses within the industrial area. On June
27, 1991, the Planning Commission considered a request to allow the
first such use, Carnival Malls, to locate within an existing research
and development center. During the public hearing, the Planning
Commission expressed conceal about the proposed hours of operation and
potential on -site parking conflicts with other site users. After much
discussion, the Commission was able to make the findings to support the
project based on the fact that there was going to be no impacts to
existinq and future site users due to off -peak hours of operation for
t'ne indoor wholesale /retail commercial use. Finally, the proposal was
consistent with the spirit and intent of Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment 91 -03. To ensure compatibility of the on -site uses, the use
was limited to the following hours of operation:
Monday through Friday - 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Incidental stacking of
merchandise for vendors and office hours for the management team - Not
Open to the Pu hlw)
Friday 5:00 P.M. - 9:00 P.M. Retail Sales
Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 8:00 P.M. Retail Sales
Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Retail Sales
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CUT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
June 3, 1992
Page 2
Following the opening of the Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial use on
NOCember 1, 1991, the applicant submitted a modification request on
December 11, 1991. The modification to Conditional Use Permit 91 -03
requested an expansion of permitted uses, operation on holidays, and the
expansion of hours of ooeration on Fridays (referred to as Items, A, B,
and C within the attached reports). On April 8, 1992, after conducting
a public hearing, the Commission conditionally approved the applicant's
request to expand the uses and hours of operation during holidays (Parts
A and B), but denied the applicant's request to expand the hours of
operation to include Fridays, from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The
Commission found that they could not support the applicant's request
because of potential negative impacts to existing and future site users.
ANALYSTS: In addition to compatibility with surrounding land uses, the
Commission could not support the project because of parking issues. The
Development Code requirement for the indoor wholesale /retail commercial
use is 1 parking space per 100 square feet. Alternatively, as part of
the Conditional use Permit review, the Planning Commission may allow 1
space per 150 square feet subject to the submittal and review of a
parking study. The parking study submitted by the applicant
demonstrated that adequate parking facilities would exist for the
proposed use at a parking ratio of 1 space per 150 square feet on
weekends only (See Exhibit "I "). A total of 691 parking stalls would be
required for the indoor wholesale /retail commercial use. The total
amount of parking required for the entire industrial center is 875
parting stalls. A total of 760 stalls have been provided which means
there would be a deficit of 119 parking stalls with all uses in
operation at the same time on weekdays. Because the applicant proposed
to operate on weekends only, the Commission was assured there would be
no parking impacts to other tenants within the center and therefore,
were consistent with the Development. Code : equirements.
In addition to the above information in the parking study, additional
information on a shared parking study for the entire shopping center was
provided. The Development Code standards assume a flat, peak parking
requirement in direct contrast to a shared parking study. With
information provided by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), the study sought
to demonstrate that adequate parking would exist for all users on
weekdays as well as weekends. These figures, under the shared parking
concept, assume that the uses within the industrial center operate with
differing peak hour demands. The reasoning being that with differing
peak hour demand, parking requirements would be less than those
identified within the Development Code, The Planning Commission
rejected the use of shared parking in this situation because (1) most of
the leaseable space is vacant making it difficult to define the types of
use5 and their parking needs; and (2) the indoor wholesale /retail
commercial. use is a "new animal" for which ULI has no available parking
date.
eel
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
June 3, 1992
Page 3
As a result of the findings identified above, the Planning Commission
denied the applicant's request to expand the hours of operation to
include Fridays. Copies of the Planning Commission Staff Reports and
Minutes are attached. The Commission then continued the item to the
April 22, 1992 meeting and adopted a Resolution of Denial at said
hearing.
Respect submits
I
Brad B
City Planner
BB: ALH: j
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "E"
Exhibit "C"
Exhibit "D"
Exhibit "E"
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit "H"
Exhibit "I"
Exhibit "J"
Applicant's Letter of .Appeal
Site plan
Staff Report, April 22, 1992
Resolution of Denial
Draft Minutes, April 22, 1992
Staff Report April 8, 1992
Minutes April 8, 1992
Staff Report, March 25, 1992
Parking Requirements
Applicants Original Modification Letter
290
r
P MAY 4 1992
�� attcalsma
M.a i. 1J.G
... Brad Bullar. City Piannar
P. . BOW uUi
Rancho Cucamonga. California 9113U
„ear Mr. Buller
We are appealing the Planning Department of the City Rancho
Cucamonga decision adopted April 22, 1992 Tot the foliowing
reasons;
1; It is correct that we originally as ed for WEEKEND
USE, However we also asked for FRIDAY NIGHTS and
were approved for USE from :UU PM to 9 ;UU PM.
21 Prior to our approval, tut AFTER OUR APPLICATION
WAS FILED. a "SHARED PARKING STUDY" was required by
the PLANNING ^.abddISSION as additional information
for the approval . our CUP during our FIRST
HEARING. When that "SHARED PARKING STUDY" was
Completed It a,I- ad THAT WE C OULD OPERATE UNDER
"CITY ^u
APPROVED REQUIREMENTS c
during ENTIRE WEEK
with CONFLICT WITH THE OTHER USERS OUR
COMPLEX".
At na time o. our ORIGINAL CUP APPLICATION we Were
rider the impression that under your EXISTING
REQUIREIMENTS We WOULD CONFLICT with the rest of the
complex. when we found that We DID NOT CONFLICT,
T WAS "TOO LATE" to amend our CUP APPLICATION and
START THE WHOLE PROCESS OVER AGAIN. Due to the
complex nature of our application and the necessary
time delays needed to COLLECT the FULL INFORMATION,
it out us under severe TIME PRESSURES from the
OWNER or we WOULD HAVE REAPPLIED! That and a
CLARIFICATION of our EXISTING CUP is why we are
REAPPLING NOW!
sl Under Paragraph 2!d) & (e) of the DENIAL, the
rindings that it CONFLICTS with the OTHER SITE
USERS ARE INCORRECT.
15)(R rf 'A►I
L1{I
THIS IS CONFIRMED BY:
;a; 'THE ORIGINAL SHARED PARKING STUDY ", prepared
by Austin- Founts, Whicn Was the basis of our
ORIGINAL APPROVAL for our CUP. This SHOWS IT DOES
NOT CONFLICT "WHILE EVEN ALLOWING FOR AN ADDITIONAL
lUn RESERVE FACTOR "!
ibl -THE FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS of RANCHO
CUCAMONGA'S "OWN" PLANNING STAFF. (SEE STAFF
REPORT)!
41 If the conditions under 4(d) A (e! are INCORRECT,
as they are, than the CONCLUSIONS under Paragraph
of the DENIAL are INCORRECT and SHOULD BE REVERSED
and our NEW APPLICATION, as "RECOMMENDED BY THE
PLANNING STAFF" be "APPROVED "!
i cerely
J mer!s�
ts Page
rnival Ma11s
JRP /la
2q2
E)44-101T '4 �� I
FY441DIT "A "Z
December —, i991
Anna -Lisa Hernanca2, Assistant Planner
Planning Department
City or Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga. California 91;3U
Dear Anna -Lisa:
ter careful consideration of our oneration and Its impact on
A
he City of Rancho Cucamonga, Carnival Malls is applying to the
Planning Department at the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a
MODIFICATION of its existing CUP at 11bJU SIXTH Street.
we are requesting the following
ij Inclusion of Personal Service Sales In addition to New
Products Sales. These Personal Services typically include.
but are not limited to travel agencies, mortgage brokers,
real estate sales, personal care, 1 beauty or nail care 1,
photography studios and other activities typical of a
personal service nature.
Extention of our HOURS of OPERATION to include ALL LEGAL
HOLIDAYS, such as; NEW YEARS DAY, VALENTINE'S DAY. LINCOLN'S
S WASHINHTCN'S BIRTHDAY, ST. PATRICK'S DAY, ARMED FORCES
DAY, MEMORIAL DAY, FLAG DAY, INDEPENDENCE DAY, LABOR DAY,
COLUMBUS DAY, UNITED NATION'S DAY. HALLOWEEN, VETERANS DAY.
THANKSGIVING, the day after THANKSGIVING and the week before
CHRISTMAS.
I; Extention of our HOURS of Operation on FRIDAY ^u to start
at IU:UU AM. instead of y:UO PM. and End at u:UO PM.
We are requesting this tar the following reasons:
1; Service Sales are a PERMITTED USE in our LAND USE
SUB -AREA. i t is also a PERMITTED USE in the ADJACENT OFFICE
BUILDING onSite. It will be a MINOR portion of the Total
Use of the Vendors in our facility. In most other cities it
is a PERMITTED C014MEIZCIAL USE. It is also part of the
EXISTING USE in the GIAJOR MALLS in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Z, Extention of Hours during HOLIDAYS means EXISTING TENANTS
In the other buildings on site, during those Holidays, WILL
DE OFF. Since the surrounding area is INDUSTRIAL EVEN LESS
TRAFFIC IMPACT will occur on these Holdays for the same
reason. There should be NO TRAFFIC problem during the WEE!,
BEFORE CHRISTMAS In that this is a period when people, take
Vacations and business In our area is generally liant. ALL
C.^.MFARABLE FACILITIES CHARGE "EXTRA RENTAL" which means some
at our Tenants will choose NOT to STAY OPEN and some wil,, ne
tied up in FULL TIME 'CBS ELSEWHERE • This will REDUCE our
TOTAL oco L'pancy• customer traffic and overall parking neeeS•
_aA
J: PARKING STUDIES DONE 1 ON COMPARABLE FACILITIES 1 IN OUR
�.:iTIAL PARKING STUDY. SHOW THAT FRIDAY IG A "LIGHT RETAIL
DAY'. We are a FAMILY FACILITY and FRIDAY is not a FAMILY
SHOPPING DAY. In addition, a number of our TENANTS are
EMPLOYED ELSEWHERE and DO NOT OPEN THEIR STORE ON FRIDAYS.
This is the reason that FRIDAYS are a "LIGHT RETAIL DAY" in
all comparable facilities.
As per our SHARED PARKING STUDY done for the CUP, TABLE /,
ALTERNATE %S, WEEKDAY PARKING, THE REPORT SHOWS THAT "WE CAN
SAFELY OPERATE EVEN DURING THIS FRIDAY TIME PERIOD ".
Of ALL the requirements for parking availability the Limits
under ALTERNATE Sa are the most RESTRICTIVE. HOWEVER FOR THE
TIME PERIOD REQUESTED WE MEET EVEN THOSE REQUIREMENTS,
IT IS NOT OUR INTENT TO IMPLEMENT ALL THE REQUESTS OF THIS
MODIFICATION. HOWEVER, WE DO NOT EXPECT TO MODIFY OUR CUP ON A
YEARLY BASIS SO WE ARE MAKING "ALL" OUR REQUESTS FOR THE FUTURE
NOW!
Thank you again for your kind help.
sincerely,
James Page
for Carnival Malls
SRF /la
29y
EX+031-r'i4''' q
April 14. 1992
,..
Brad Buiiar, City Planner
Planning Department
City or Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga. Caiitornia 911JU
Dear Mr. Buller:
in regards to the Planning Commission action on April 8th 1'i9Z.
MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 a number of items
need clarification.
A. we have requested expansion of our hours to include
FRIDAYS. It is believed that that is a PROFITABLE move on
our part. That is just not the case. CARNIVAL INDOOR STREET
FAIRE incures ONLY COST BY EXPANDING TO FRIDAY. What occured
was OUR TENANTS, residents of RANCHO CUCAMONGA requested that
they be allowed to operate on FRIDAY as well as SATURDAY &
SUNDAY. The reason that it is important to them 1s that a
number of them LOST THEIR JOBS.
J�
When we applied for FRIDAY NIGHT, SATURDAY & SUNDAY in our
original application we telt as we do now that economically
that wasito OUR BENEFIT. We still believe so; However. who
knew the present depression was at hand. Retailers need help
today, especially ours who are just starting out and can't
pay HIGH RENTS. We nave done our part by reducing rents by
over :US to help them.
As we stated in the meeting; "OUR HOURS OF OPERATION "DO NOT"
INCLUDE ANY FRIDAY HOURS OF OPERATION, PRESENTLY, EVEN THOUGH
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. If we were looking to expand our
operation why did we CANCEL FRIDAY NIGHT OPERATION'; EVERY
HOUR WE ARE OPEN COSTS US MONEY. WHAT PERSONAL MOTIVATION DO
WE HAVE TO EXPAND OUR HOURS',' TO LOSE MORE MONEY','
Start acknowledges that we can operate with no problems
regarding traffic and parking. It is acknowledged that we
can be stopped from expanding to other days. understand we
are requesting NOT ON OUR BEHALF, but on behalf of your
RESIDENTS to allow a Friday Weekday Operation ONLY. We are
prepared to enter into any type of agreement you wish to
Insure our compliance. Your positive action is not
benet.iclal to us, but can go along way to helping those
People who are trying to economically survive. Please look
Into your hearts and help them!
sincerely,
James Page
WESTICOR INCORP, it's President
ZPiSr
,.a...,, .'a91
Mr. Alex Vicencto, Civil Engineer
P. O. Box au;
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91lZ9
Dear Mr. Vicancio;
We are applying to the Planning Department of the city of Rancho
Cucamonga for permission to use the Existing Facilities located
at 11S3U SIXTH Street as a RETAIL MALL for weekend use. The
following is a report on its impact on traffic and parking for
the property.
Our Development, a MINI -MALL is a commercial use. As such, It
best tits under Category / of your "LAND USE TRIP RATE SUMMARY ".
This is described as "REGIONAL COMMERCIAL ". The Average Customer
is coming for Entertainment and Shopping. The availability of
merchandise from APPROXIMATELY ZUU SMALL STORES ( AVERAGE SIZE
GUU - 4UU sq. ft.). With the USE of KIDDY RIDES and TELEVISION,
including both Sporting Events. for Adults, and Cartoons for the
chtldren a PROLONGED stay at our MALL Will occur for the FAMILY.
it iS quite possible tnat our TRUE A.D.T. will be more likely
that Ot a GOLF COURSE, HEALTH CLUB or PARK because of the ACTUAL
STAY OF OUR CUSTOMER: certainly more like a REGIONAL MALL because
Of Its Entertainment Facilities.
Our HOURS Ot OPERATION are 3:PM - 9:PM FRIDAY, IU:AM - U:FM
SATURDAY and IU:AM - 6:PM SUNDAY.
PHASE 1, has SU.uou sq. ft. GROSS and 26,000 sq. ft. of RETAIL
SALES SPACE. PHASE Z has 1U1,324 sq. ft. of GROSS SPACE and
S�,000 sq. ft. of RETAIL SALES SPACE. PHASE 2 applies to the
ENTIRE OPERATION.
Our Advertising is geared to the INLAND EMPIRE AREA. We are
uFing primarily RADIO and direct mail. Tne advertising marketing
lntormation shows OUR CUSTOMERS Will come from the entire
surrounding MARKET AREA. This means our MAIN traffic corridors
are along the lU & 1S FREEWAYS. exiting at HAVEN, MILLIKEN & 4th
STREETS and along 6th street, running both East & West.
SECONDARY Or LOCAL trattic from the East will take FOOTHILL,
ARROW HIGHWAY and 4t1n STREETS West only slightly impacting the
area. However, we have the UNIQUE ABILITY TO DIRECT TRAFFIC
ACCESS TO OUR SITE. Our advertising can be varied so that we CAN
EDUCATE the CUSTOMER as to 'WHAT ROUTES to TAKE to ACCESS OUR
29(e
ESN ►8i1 1A 1)
SITE. We can therefore CHANGE or MITIGATE TRAFFIC PATTERNS
THROUGH OUR ADVERTISING to SUIT CHANGING TRAFFIC DEMANDS. That
IS UNIQUE to any business.
Our traffic will occur ON WEEKENDS, when BUSINESS TRIPS on these
corridors are either vastly reduced or NON EXISTENT. We should
therefore add little or none to the OVERALL TRAFFIC PATTERNS and
even FALL WELL UNDER THE PROJECTED "WEEKLY" TRAFFIC STUDIES for
our IMMEDIATE area.
Our area is NOT RESIDENTIAL In nature and was PLANNED for and has
SUPERIOR TRAFFIC CIRCULATION as well as "OFFSITE PARKING ". The
RESIDENTIAL in the MARKET AREA is ADEQUATELY REMOVED from this
location. Within OUR MARKET AREA, this site, is located In a
BUFFER AREA where traffic 1s DIRECTED TO THE FREEWAYS.
By locating on this site we HAVE REMOVED the NEGATIVE TRAFFIC
IMPACT our operation might cause in some OTHER RETAIL COMMERCIAL
AREA and mitigate the WEEKLY BUSINESS TRAFFIC CONGESTION of over
IUU,000 sq ft Of space which, in the future, will never
negatively impact OUR AREA AGAIN.
Sincerely,
James Page
Carnival Malls
ENC:
JRPIla
7197
' U ':: I'nl ,�i' I `II ''J :' I �i11 , I !fIIIIIIUIIIIilllillll „lijlaill
I,•II �'I "ill :552SI I fB2A 10
dl 800 50 fi /
\ll U
BUILDING BUILDING] °� n
20 I ]8.]001!1 Fl \ \
1 } 1
ll '.� I, � t�� 1 .�J lllllil�i l!IIIIV1;flAA ���
�J .11..u.ui° !L110't;11ll L _ !!ll�jlli IIlIL1�IIIIIIi:IIIILII 1100,
1!- - -
.n.
SIXI119ItEi t
Site Plim
L,
X
Z
P_
4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
W
MIN
m
n
fl
I
W
MIN
m
L11I yr n:A.Nk- HUl;l,l..AAW24(iA
STAFF REPORT
,,:,:E: Npril 22, 1992
-. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
It
SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE -
Resolution of Denial for a request to expand the hours of
operation on Fridays for an existing 103,522 square foot
.indoor wholesale /retail commercial use located within the
General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -28.
ABSTRACT: On April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission reviewed the
applicant's request to expand the hours of operation to include Fridays
from 10 a.m. to B p.m., within the existing Carnival Malls site. After
reviewing staff's report and taking public testimony, the Planning
Commission could not support the applicant's request due to potential
cumulative parking and compatibility issues with other site users and
directed staff to return with a Resolution of Denial at the next
available Planning Commission Consent Calendar. Before you tonight is
the requested Res oLUtion of Denial.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the
applicant's request for hours of operation on Fridays through adoption
of the attached Resolution of Denial.
Rasp ly subm' ,
Bra ulle
City Planner
BB:ALH /Ifs
Attachment: Resolution of Denial
exkIsrr"dc.
RESOLUTION N0. - - ---
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM415SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
..=C40NCA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING .A MODIFICATION m0 CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 91 -03, PART C, FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE HOURS
OF OPERATION ON* FRIDAYS, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
D- STRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-
262-29.
A. Recitals.
(1) lames Page has filed an application for a modification to
Conditional Use Permit No. 91 -03 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit modification request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 26th day of February 1992, and continued t, the 25th day
of March and the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on April 8, 1992.
(iii) On the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission reviewed
the proposal and staff's presentation and received public testimony. At the
conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission directed staff to
prepare a Resolution of Denial for their meeting of April 22, 1992
!iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
S. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, e.nd resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial, evidence presented to this Commission during
the above- referenced public hearing on February 26, March 25, and April 8,
1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
- estimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
'a) The application applies tc property located at 11530 Sixth
Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and
is presently tmproved with three research and de..elopment buildings and 760
parking spaces; and
(b) ':he property to the north, south, east, and west is General
rndustrial.
XH re�� "D"
PLaNNIAG rCMISSiON RESOL1JT:N NC. ._
MnD, Tp CUP 91 -03, PART C - 2AMES PAGE
Aorr1 22, 1992
Page 2
(ct The Indoor '.tnolesale /Retail Comercial Use is located within a
General Industrial zone Subarea 11 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The
General Industrial zone was intended to accommodate a wide range of light to
medium manufacturing and wholesale, storage and distribution eases. Typically,
adninistracuve office, professional, and indoor 'dholesaie /retail commercial
uses are not allowed to reduce potential land use conflicts. The primary
finding in permitting the use to locate within the Research and Development
industrial Center was the fact that there would not be any conflict with the
hours of operation of the general industrial users within the site with off-
set hours of operation on weekends only. The ancillary nature of the indoor
wholesale /retail commercial use on weekends only was found to be consistent
with the original intent of the General Industrial zone. This proposal to
expand the hours of operation directly conflicts with the intent of the
General Industrial zone of the Industrial Specific Plan and would conflict
with on -site business operations.
(d) The original approval of the application was based on the fact
that the application would operate during different hours of operation of
other users within the center, thereby, minimizing all potential impacts to
other current site and future businesses. With the current proposal, hours of
operation on Fridays from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. would conflict with the
hours of operation of other site users, and adversely impact those businesses.
(e) The proposed hours of operation would conflict with the
utilization of parking facilities for other users within the site.
3• Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above.- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is Located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable
thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or
:materially injurious to properties or improvements In the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use does not comply with each of the
- applicable provisions of the Development Code and Industrial Area Specific
Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
3c, 1 F,)e.H1811 "D'f I
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. a =-< -3
MOD. TO COP 91 -03, PART C - JAMES PAGE
April 22, 1992
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL 1992.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and -
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of April 1992, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, 9CNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
30z j5pll rr I'D'( t
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
April 22, 1992
Chairman McNiel called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council
Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Chairman McNiel t' 3n led in the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel,
John Melchor, Peter Tolstoy,
Wendy Vailette
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal
Planner; Bettye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer; Ralph
Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Anna -Lisa Hernandez,
Assistant Planner; Barbara Krall, Assistant Engineer;
Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner; Scott Murphy,
Associate Planner; Shelley Petrelli, Planning Division
Secretary; Steve Ross, Assistant Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Brad Buller, City Planner, suggested that Items G and I be discussed at the
same time since they are related.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: Moved by Melcher, seconded by Tolstoy, unanimously carried, to adopt
the minutes of March 25, 1992,
Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Belcher, carried 4- 0 -0 -1, (Vailette
abstained) to adopt the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of April 2, 1992.
DRAFT 303 E1tHl 5VT "E �(
FOR DISCUSSION PURPCSES ONLY
CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE - Resolution of
Denial for a request to expand the hours of operation on Fridays for an
existing 103,522 square foot indoor wholesale /retail commercial use
Located within the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -28.
(Continued from April 8, 1992.)
James Page, Carn -val Malls, requested Item A be pulled for discussion.
Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner, gave a brief summary of her previous
staff report.
Chairman HcNiel opened the public hearing.
James Page, Carnival Malls, 6221 Warner Dr., Los Angeles, stated he wished to
address the Commission because he felt the Commission may have gotten the
wrong impression from the last meeting regarding the reasons why they had
asked for exoanded hours of operation on Fridays. He pointed out that it was
the tenants who had asked for the expanded hours. He stated that the concept
behind this mall is to help the small business person get started. He
commented that the City of Los Angeles is opposed to swap meets in their city,
but they are now promoting this concept for the same reasons as Carnival
Malls. With the current economic situation, he stated they are very concerned
about what will happen to all the people being laid off from their jobs; his
company stands ready to help by retraining these people. He remarked that
facilities of this type are extremely important. He stated that their
organization is similar to Fedco, which is not considered a swap meet, and
Carnival Malls does not consider themselves a swap meet either.
Chairman Mcliei asked why they were requesting Friday daytime hours when thev
are not utilizing Friday evening hours.
Mr. Page replied that they voluntarily chose not to utilize evening hours on
Fridays because it was not economically sound for the vendors. He stated that
the vendors were requesting Friday daytime hours because more women shop by
themselves on Fridays.
Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. He asked for comments from the
Commission.
Commi.ss':cner Melcher stated that the previous approval for this type of use at
this location was based, in part, on the fact that the mall would be oper.
during hours other businesses would be closed. He stated that the remainder
of the project is vacant currently, but he was concerned that sufficient
parking would not be. available when the project becomes fully operational. He
felt that, in spite o` the applicant's sincere request, it would be
inappropriate to allow this extension of operating hours because of the
potential parking problems.
Planning Commission Minutes 16t April 22, 1992
D,-�skr--r 3.4
1- cxH�e�T "E-t'.
r_ ^r� QISCUS SIGN PUii?,^, S'F_S (-:NJ LY
Commissioner Tolstoy agreed with Commissioner. Melcher, but he added it would
pose a such larger problem than a conflict within the complex; it would pose a
conflict Within the entire industrial area because of the additional traffic
that would be caused by their weekday operations.
Commissioner Chi.tiea concurred with the comments made by Commissioners Melcher
and Tolstny.
MOTION: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried 5 -0 -0, to
adopt the Resolution of Denial.
Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: C4ITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
.`TOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried
Y f 1 f 4
B. -%3h SIGN REVIEW 14407 -1 - LEWIS HOMES - The design review of bu it
e tions and detailed site plan for a previously approved ten ve
trac,. consisting o£ 13 single family homes on 1.3 acres of Ian the
Medium dential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) of a Terra
Vista Plan Community, located on the west side of Mountai ew Drive,
south of Hase Ane Road - APN: 227 - 151 -15.
1,
C. DESIGN REVIEW FOR +gTATIVE TRACT 14365 - LEWIS
HOME The design review
of building elevation :and detailed site plan fo previ rn!sly approved
tentative tract map consAkting of 41 single fao ^ homes on 5.85 acres of
land in the Medium Resident %I District (8 -1 welling units per acre) of
the Terra Vista Planned CommuV locat on the south side of Mountain
View Drive west of Mil. liken Avenuet„AA 1077 - 091 -36.
Jary Cockcroft, Lewis Homes, 1156 No r1KMoib*ayin, Upland, requested Items B, C
be pulled for discussion. ��j�r Y
Chairman McNiel opened the py�ltc hearing• " y
Chairman McNiel asked {+/rCockcroft what he wished to dlpcuse.
Mr. Cockcrof` repWed he wanted an opportunity to clarifyftgme of the design
review rommen Wade at the last Design Review meeting and hir lso wanted to
have Condi n No. 15 of the Standard Conditions deleted b sa neither
t ,
projec a homeowner association project.
BraOFBuller, City Planner, asked the applicant for specific clarificatm�l on
the Design Review i. slues.
Planning Commission Minutes April. 22, 1992 ,
CRAFT Ey 11101T �c'i
h:OR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DA-E: ;or-,l 8, 1992
TO: - hairman and Members of the Planning Commission
'ROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
By: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SV B,JEC ^ :: MODIFICATION TO CON DL TIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE - ,l
request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the
permitted uses within an existing 103,522 square foot indoor
v:nolesa le /r eta i'_ commercial use located within the General
Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -28.
(Continued from March 25, 1992.)
Addenda Staff Report for Conditional Dee Perth 91 -03
(Carnival !falls).
ABSTRACT: The applicant has submitted two letters (see Exhibits "A" F
"B "), which provide new information addressing the March 25, 1992, staff
report regarding Parking, security, and business licensing issues. The
applicant has also requested that the Planning Commission consider the
additional use of an outdoor swap meet use within the project site to be
permitted in con7unetion with a Temporary Use Permit.
ANALYSIS:
A. Expansion of Permitted Uses: In addition to those items identified
within the March 25, 1992, staff report, the applicant is also
requesting that jewelry repair services be permitted within the
Carnival Malls project.
Staff Continents: Retail sales of jewelry and watches is allowed
'an der the Indoor wholesale /Retail Commercial use category. The
; ewelry repair service could be listed under the Convenience Sales
and Service category within the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
:nc-:=nience Sales and Services are permitted within the subarea,
'nth an approved Conditional Use Permit from the Planning
:omnlssion. The use will not adversely impact the existing or
future uses '+ithin the project, is it will be ancillary to the
primary use of retail sales.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
ipprove the applicant's request to permit the jewelry repair service
•t`h in the carp :.val Mall project site. 11 O
PLANNING COMMISSIDN 57,.,- FEPCET
MOD. 'i0 CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
April 8, 1992
page 2
3. Extension of Hours of Operation During Holidays: No new information
^as been submitted by the applicant. Staff's recommendation is
unchanged.
C. Expanded Hours of Oceration on Fridays: The applicant has requested
to expand the hours of operation on Fridays from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.
Staff Comments: Originally, staff based its recommendation on
inaccurate information discussed within the shared parking study
submitted by ^_he applicant. The Development code parking
requirement for the Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial use is 1
space per 100 square feet. Alternatively, as part of the
Conditional use Permit review, the Planning Commission may allow 1
space per 150 square feet subject to the submittal and review of a
parking study.
The shared parking study indicates that a total of 691 spaces will
be necessary for all uses operating at the same time on weekdays.
This figure is based on the typical demand within similar centers
and includes a 10 percent buffer. This figure also assumes that a
majority of the uses do not operate at their peak demands at the
same time. A total of 760 parking stalls have been provided.
Therefore, there are enough parking spaces for all existing and
future tenants within the center, as determined within the shared
parking study. operation of the facility during weekdays would not
negatively impact other users.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve the shared parking concept for the project, and allow the
applicant to operate on Fridays.
Other Issues: In the previous review, staff noted issues relating
to business licensing and security for the Carnival Malls site. The
applicant has contacted licensing staff and is working diligently to
rectify those issues. The applicant clarified that they have
security personnel and are in compliance with this requirement.
Conditions had been placed in the previous staff report and on the
resolutions to ensure continued compliance. In raising these
tssues, staff felt that the Planning Commission, in its review of
the expansion of the proposed hours of operation, should be aware of
these concerns.
E. ')se Determination: On March 26, 1992, staff received another letter
from the applicant ;see Exhibit "A ") requesting that we consider
locating the existing General Dynamics weekend swap meet (an outdoor
swap meet use) within the Carnival Malls site. The General Dynamics
property is currently for sale and the operators of the outdoor
electronics swap meet are seekil:g an alternative site for their use.
30l
rXY IPI'( "r` -1
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MOD. TO CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
April 8, 1992
Page 3
'he applicant has requested that the Planning Commission permit the
applicant to conduct the proposed indoor /outdoor swap meet use on a
_rial basis through the Temporary Use Permit process. The applicant
:.s requesting that the outdoor portion of the use be permitted to
operata one Saturday a month.
Staff Comments: Currently, the outdoor swap meet use is permitted
only within the Heavy Industrial zone, Subarea 15, of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan. Allowing this use on a regular basis within the
site would require a Land Use Amendment to the Industrial Area
Specific Plan and another modification to the original Conditional
Use Permit.
A Temporary Use Permit serves to control and regulate land use
activities of a temporary nature which might negatively effect the
public health, safety, and welfare for uses such as parking
lot sidewalk sales, christmas tree lots, etc. These events are
limited to three times annually, not to exceed a maximum of 3
consecutive days per event within each center (see Exhibit "C").
Staff cannot support the proposed Temporary Use Permit on a monthly
basis for the following reasons:
1. The Development Code allows each site a maximum of three
Temporary Use Permits to be issued per site, annually. The
applicant is requesting that these outdoor swap meets occur on
a regular monthly basis.
Outdoor swap meets are not permitted within General Industrial
zones.
The Industrial Area Specific Plan clearly states that all
businesses are to be conducted within an enclosed building (see
Exhibit "D ").
Staff has numerous concerns in combining an indoor /outdoor swap meet
use within a General Industrial site. There may be cumulative
impacts which might negatively affect other site users. Aesthetics,
parking, business licensing, and site maintenance are just a few
potential problems. Although the applicant is requesting a trial
basis of the indoor /outdoor swap meet use, staff feels that a one -
- me Occurrence may not be sufficient enough to predict all the
simulative impacts, particularly since the site is not fully leased
or developed.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin as a public hearing, the project site was posted, and
.notices were sent to all properties within 300 feet of the project site.
308 F'Y+f 181'f "P '-L
PLAN9ING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MOD. TO CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
April d, 1992
Page 4
RE C.,,MMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Parts A, B, and C, with modifications through adoption of the attached
Resolutions (separate Resolutions are provided for your convenience).
If the Planning Commission cannot support any of the proposed
modifications, then staff should be directed to prepare Resolutions of
Denial for adoption on your next consent calendar agenda. Staff
recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the proposed
monthly outdoor electronic swap meet is a prohibited use for Subarea 11
through adoption of the attached Resolution.
R es/
Pe u11y itte ,
grad uller
City Planner
BB:ALH /Ifs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter dated March 25, 1992
Exhibit "B" - Applicant's Letter dated March 27, 1992
Exhibit "C" - Temporary Use Permit Requirements
Exhibit "D" - Industrial Area Specific Plan
"Condition of Uses"
Exhibit "E" - Staff Report dated March 2S, 1992
Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Uses
Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Hours to Include
Holidays
Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Hours to Include
Fridays
Resolution of Denial for Outdoor Swap Meet Use
,3ai �i�t+lgl7 )1�ii3
Mr. Thonoeon replied that i. will regain only as a link to the east.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman MCNiel closed the public hearing
Cc mmisa io r,er chitiea remarked that she was not in favor of the project because
it >s ad-acent to residsnt.al development. She felt that if the Commission
approved the project, all improvements should to made up front.
Commissioner Melchor remarked that he had been with the developer at the time
the policies were originally adopted, and he thought he knew the reasons for
the adoption. He felt the conditions should be revised because he did not
feel they are within in the spirit of the policies.
Commissioner Valletta noted that she originally opposed the project as a
whole. She felt that the location on Base Line and Rochester will generate
additional traffic on Rochester necessitating the street improvements down to
Church. She also felt the storm drains should be constructed in light of the
experience during recent atorms.
Commissioner Tolstoy agreed with Comm ^, 'miner Chitiea that all improvements
should be made up front.
Chairman McNiel noted that !.a did not think -t set should be narrowed 'nid-
block. He supported staff's position of requiri.q the improvements.
Motion: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Tolncoy, to issue a Negative
Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Tentative Parcel Map 13987.
Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
MCNIEL,
MELCMER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
CIIITIEA
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
NONE
- carried
E. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL VSE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE - A request to
modify the hours of operation and to expand the permitted uses within an
existing 103,522 square foot indoor wholesale /retail commercial use
located within the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229- 262 -28.
(Continued from March 25, 1992.)
Anna -Liza Hernandez, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Melchor asked if the additional uses would require individual
conditional use permits, so that each time one of the small businesses wanted
to locate there, it would have to appear before the Planning Commission.
Brad Buller, City Planner, replied as proposed they would not.
Planning Comr.iseion minutes 4W April 8, 1992
No CX_W(N 11"6
Cccmiseioner M.Icher felt that .: the Ccam -scion agreed that the shared
parking theory works for Friday operations. the applicant would then request
seven - day -per -week operations.
Dan Colea.an, Principal 21anrer, noted the shared parking study could be used
to demonstrate that sufficient parking is available seven days per week, but
the _cnd:t.onal use permit would limit the operation to whatever times the
commission dictated.
Commissioner Melchor questioned why the applicant was only asking for all day
Fridays, instead of all week long. He noted that concerns had been raised in
the previous staff report regarding adherence to business license requirements
and adequacy of security personnel. He asked how those problems had been
addressed.
He. Hernandez responded that the applicant had not advised why they were only
requesting Friday hours of operation. She noted that since the initial staff
report, the applicant had worked with planning staff and business license
staff to ensure that vendors are properly licensed. She said the City
Attorney had informed staff that the conditions had been tightened as much as
legally possible to secure compliance. She said that business license staff
has been visiting the site on weekends to take applications. Ms. Hernandez'
observed that the applicant had dismissed the hired security service one week
after commencing operations and had hired their own security force without
informing staff who those security people are. She noted that the applicant
has indicated they will submit a listing of their security personnel.
chairman M<Niel asked if it would be legal for the outdoor swap meet to take
place at the General Dynamics location.
Mr. Buller said it appears the use started after adoption of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan which prohibits the use. He noted there had been
discussions at City Council and the Council wan aware of the use and had
indicated it was not a concern to them in its present location. He said
therefore staff had not pursued enforcement.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
fames Page, carnival Malls, 11530 Sixth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they
had diligently pursued working with the City to address any problems that have
come up. He stated they were trying to work with staff with regards to
business licensing. He remarked that some vendors had only operated for one
weekend and tied therefor* not followed through with obtaining a license. He
stated that the City Council had discussed the outdoor swap meet and the City
Council members seemed to feel it was working well. He said the person who
ran the swap meet had approached him and requested that the swap meet be moved
to carnival Malls since the General Dynamics site was being sold. He felt the
swap meet could be better regulated Lf it was moved to his site. He noted
that they are currently selling food and using portable toilets at the General
Dynamite site. He noted that the swap meet operates from 6:00 to 11:00 a.m.
while Carnival Malls opens at 10:00 a.m., so there would be an overlap of
Planning Commission Minutes -b^ April B, 1992
zii f,/44 .BIT ltd tI'
time. He suggested that a temporary --so permit be granted to allow the swap
neat to operate a maximum of three tines to to sure things would ac k
satisfactorily. He said t'nat would allow them to make adjustments as
necessary to mitigate any problems that arise.
C=missioner Tolstoy asked if the electronics swap meet deals in both new and
,tad erchandise.
Mr. Page responded that they do.
Commissioner Tolstoy noted that when the original conditional use permit for
Carnival Malls was approved only new items were to be sold.
Mr. Buller confirmed that was correct.
Commissioner Tolstoy noted chat if the electronics swap meet was going to sell
second hand equipment, it would not meet the original conditional use permit
conditions.
Mr. Page suggested the swap meet could be restricted to selling only now
equipment.
Commissioner Tolstoy felt a great preponderance of the electronic swap most
trade is in second hand items. He felt such a restriction would limit the
swap most to a point where it would not be successful.
Mr. Page remarked that was why they had suggested allowing the swap most an a
temporary basis so that mitigations could be proposed to solve the problems
that crop up. He noted that the staff report mentioned that no outdoor
activities are permissible unless screened. He suggested mitigating the
outdoor swap meet by screening it.
Ccmmissioner Tolstoy noted that outdoor swap meets are conditionally permitted
in the Heavy Industrial Area and not in the ions where the applicant's
business is located.
Commissioner Chitiea asked who is responsible for the lighting and security of
the parking lot.
Mr. Page replied that they were in conjunction with the landlord.
Commissioner Chitiea noted that she had recently visited the property and it
had turned dark by the time she left. She felt the parking lot lighting was
insufficient with some lights not functioning. She said she saw no security
parocnnel and she felt very uncomfortable with the conditions. She wanted
those conditions addressed under the present circumstances.
Mr. Page stated they had contacted the Planning Department regarding the
lighting situation. He said one of the other tenants in the business park had
disconnected most of the parking lot lights because they had been on his
Planning Commiesion Minutes +M. April 9, 1992
311 Orr 116 u Z
meter. He said they had discussed the problem w: h the boner tenant and the
landlord and the landlord is working to correct the problem and install more
lignting.
Commissioner Chitiea requested that additional security personnel be present
ant.'_ the 1_ghting is sufficient.
Mr. Page asked .f she was looking for uniformea security personnel.
Commissioner Chitiea noted she had not seen anyone at the time she was there
and she was very uncomfortable. She suggested someone be there in uniform as
that patrons and vendors '4111 realize it is not merely someone who is
loitering.
Mr. Page agreed that was a goad suggestion and said he would work on it.
commissioner :olstoy asked if it would not be possible for the applicant to
require that vendors supply a copy of their business license before renting
them apace.
Mr. Page responded that the vendors have to rent the space before they caw)
apply for a business license. He said there had also been some problems with
the franchise tax board. Mr. Page stated his lease agreements indicate that
City business licenses are required.
Commissioner Melchor noted that the applicant had indicated they were not open
on Friday evenings even though the current conditional use permit allows them
to be open.
Mr. Page responded that they found they did not generate enough business on
Friday evenings to justify being open. He said that during the day on Friday
seems to be a better time for women to shop alone rather than in the evening
hours when they are bisy with the family. He noted that on the weekends they
generally draw entire families and it was felt they could greatly increase
their business by being open on Fridays during the day.
Commissioner Helcher recalled that the applicant had originally requested
weekend operations stating that their concept was to provide incubator stalls
for people who held other jobs. He asked how the vendors would be able to be
open on Fridays if they had other jobs.
Mr. Page remarked that not all vendors would be open on Fridays, but he
projected that about 50 percent would open with 100 percent on weekends.
comet LeaSoner Melchor asked about the security personnel program. He asked how
many people were involved, what training they had received, and whether they
wear uniforms.
Mr. Page replied that they had terminated their contract with the security
firm first hired because they did not feel the employees were capable of doing
the )ob. He felt they were too old and infirm. He stated they had hired the
Planning Commission Minutes kji- April 8, 1997
3 '3 Ey-
head person from the security firm and he now has hired security personnel •who
work directly for Carnival Malls. He said they nine young men up to age 25
who are healthy and alert and acme have had galice training.
Commissioner Melchor asked how many people are employed solely as security
pereon.nel and when they are there.
Mr. Page said there are three security personnel there when the facility is
open and none when it is closed.
Commissioner ^olstay recalled there had been discussions about the amount of
training for the security personnel. He noted that it did not appear their
security personnel had been formally trained. He felt it is important that
the security people be adequately trained.
Mr. Page said that they are either ex- policemen or have been trained by
Carnival Mails staff.
Commissioner Melchor asked if the security personnel wear uniforms.
Mr. Page replied that they do not.
Commissioner Melchor asked how a patron, or vendor would find a security
person.
Mr. Page replied that the head of security wears a badge. He remarked that
they could use uniform*.
Commissioner iolatoy thought that had been discussed when the use was first
approved.
Mr. Coleman remarked that uniforma had been discussed, but they had not been
.made a requirement. He said it was a requirement that security personnel were
to be provided both inside and outside.
Doran Yalian, Carnival Malls, 11530 Sixth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he
thought the Planning Commission had made a good decision when they approved
the Carnival Malls project. He said they had seen a lot of businesses come in
and acre have graduated to take offices in other parts of town. He noted that
the gentleman who runs the electronics swap meet was also in the audience.
Chairman McNie1 asked Mr. Yalian's function with Carnival Malls.
Mr. Yalian replied that he manages the facility.
Bryan Brock, operator for General Dynamite swap meet, stated he had operated
the swap meet since its inception. He noted the swap meet was Instituted for
the benefit of ham radio operators and took more than a year to be approved by
General Dynamics to operate At its present location. He stated he had called
the Rancho Cucamonga business office and the Police Department when they were
organizing and he was told that business licenses would not be required. He
Planning Commission Minutes e9+-
April
8, 1992
air
� X N ►�� i
���'�
`f
reported that the swap meet started operating in January 1986 and occur. cn
the second Saturday of every month. He said it is a very successful swap meet
with good quality merchandise. He noted that many people in the hobby cannot
afford to buy new equipment and therefore must shop at a swap meet. He said
he -.oboes their swap meet every day that it operates and he looke for
hazardous naterlala or other materials against their regulations. He said he
+anted to move their operation to a class location, not a flea market
atmosphere. He said they only have electronics and relative tools that the
hobbyist would use. He indicated the swap meet has grown tremendously and is
now the largest of its kind in Southern California. He said they would be
more than willing to work with the City to be sure that any necessary business
licenses are obtained. He requested that they be able to operate under a
temporary use permit ■e they could prove they run a class operation that would
complement Carnival Mail*. He requested that staff and the Cenmissioners
visit the swap meet. He felt the swap meet is a benefit to the community and
noted that many of the vendors leave the swap meet and then go to lunch in the
area. He guessed that approximately 3,000 people attend the swap meet during
the course of the day.
Chairman MCNi *1 asked how many vendors generally participate.
Mr. Brock estimated 350 vendors on average. '
Chairman McNial asked how that would affect parking at the facility.
Mr. Brock said their current lot is set up so that vendors drive up and vend
from their pa: :king spot.
Chairman McNiel asked why they had not considered having the vendors inside.
Mr. Brock said that some of the -,orders would like to be indoors because they
have equipment which can be damaged by the elements; however, he felt it would
be difficult to have all of the vendors inside. He said some of the vandora
may even be interested in being full time participants at Carnival Malls.
Commissioner Melchor asked if the swap meet is secured by fencing when it
functions at General Dynamics.
Mr. Brock replied that it is not.
Commissrcner Melchor asked if any other busintan is being conducted on the
property that day.
Mr. Brock said there could be a Small number of employees working that day.
Commissioner Melchor asked how much area the swap meet occupies.
Mr. Brock said he had never done an overall parking apace count.
Commissioner Melchor asked where they proposed placing the swap most at the
Carnival Mall site.
planning Commission minutes 1d0�- April 9, 199]
�
3)s �,�+�a�7 l�� , s
Mr. Brock said they had several ideas. He said their first thought had been
to use the area across the tack of the parking lot north of the building and
they Tight expand and use t. ^.e northwest side if necessary. He said both areas
are backed from view of the street. He said the area they use on the parking
lat .c.:ld depend upon how man' vendors opted to locate inside the building.
Commissioner Melcher asked if all of that property was under the control of
Carnival Malls.
Mr. Page responded that it was.
Commissioner Melchor asked where customers will park.
Hr. Brock said customers could park in front and an the aides. He recalled
that there were over 700 parking spaces available on site. He thought there
were approximately 175 in the back area.
Paul Petty, 8547 clubhouse Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he worked with Mr.
Brock at the General Dynamics swap meet and had been with them since their
inception. He believed the function is necessary for the community. He said
the amateur radio community has grown through inventing and adapting existing
equipment. He said the sources for purchasing single components for
developing technology ham dried up and it is virtually impossible to buy only
mew equipment. He also noted that most people upgrade their equipment by
selling their old equipment. He remarked that used commercial equipment in
converted for private use. He noted that vendors and buyers from outside of
Calife_nia attend trio swap meet. He thought that if the hours do not overlap,
theca should not be any parkins problems.
Commissioner Melcher asked how much longer they would be operating at the
General Dynamics site.
Mr. Petty responded they did not know.
Commissioner Melchor asked if vendors are charged a fee.
Mr. Petty said a space fee is collected. He said they started out without
collecting fees, but the vendors requested garbage facilities and portable
toilets so they now collect fees to provide such services.
Richard Maratz, 8745 Lurlins, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he had attended the
City Council meeting when the conditional use permit for Carnival Malls was
discussed and he did not recall the Council wanting to prohibit outdoor swap
meets. He requested a copy of the staff report.
Chairman McNiel stated that outdoor swap meets are permitted in Subarea 15 of
the industrial Area Specific Plan.
Mr. Maratz stated he frequents the swap meets as a buyer. He asked the
commission to approve a temporary use permit for the swap mot to be hold at
the Carnival Mall Site. He said the swap meet currently has high visibility
Planning Commission Minutes AZ+. April B, 1992
3)(0 �%Ft'IB IT u4 "! &
and allowing it to operate under a temporary use permit would give the City
knowledge on how it would operate at the Carnival Mall site.
Sohn Wendt, 10260 56th Street, Mira Loma, stated he is a licensed ham radio
operator and a member of Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service (R.A.0.E.S.), a
group which work. with the City's Disaster Preparedness department. He said a
Lot of the R.A.C.E.S. members buy equipment at the swap meet. He also
reported that electronics stores used to allow trade ins of used equipment, so
that people used to be able to buy used equipment at electronics stores. He
said that the stores no Longer allow trade -ins, so the swap meet has become a
major source of equipment. He Boxed the Commission to look favorably upon the
swap meet.
Sohn Schute, 10155 Hemlock, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he in a ham radio
operator and a R.A.C.E.S. member. He said the ham radio industry is so
specialized that without the swap meet it would be necessary to drive to
downtown Los Angeles in order to purchase parts.
Chris Puent, stated she is one of the vendors at carnival Malls. She said she
is a big fan of used items in that she likes collectables and antiques. She
.aid she had been a vendor at Carnival Malls since November and it has been a
tough year. She hoped that the introduction of the electronics swap meet
would benefit the Carnival Mall vendors and the mall vendors would benefit the
swap meet people. She Bald that many of the Carnival Mall vendors are there
out of economic necessity because they have lost their other jobs.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNie1 closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Tolatoy noted that the Commission needed to discuss applications
for expansion of permitted uses within Carnival Malls, an expansion of the
days of operation to include certain holidays, and an expansion of the hours
of operation on Fridays. He agreed with staff's recommendations on those
three items. He was concerned about the shared parking concept but felt staff
had addressed his concerns. He felt the security issue should be addressed as
he thought the operators had hired young people who did not appear to have
adequate training. He also thought the applicant could address the business
license issue by not allowing anyone to sell without a City business
license. He supported the electronic swap meet, but was concerned about the
sale of used equipment, because he feared that other types of used equipment
may then be offered and that may lead to problems with stolen merchandise. He
noted that the City already has a subarea which conditionally approves outdoor
swap meets, and he felt that was where the electronic swap meet should locate.
Commissioner Valletta agreed with staff's recommendations, She felt the
electronic swap meet has played an important part in the community and is a
valuable aveet to the community, but she did not agree this was a proper
location.
Commissioner Melchor did not favor mixing Service uses with the indoor swap
meet use. Ke noted that both types of uses are conditionally permitted within
the subarea but he did not feel it would be appropriate to mix the uses at one
Planning Commission Minutes .44 April 8, 1992 )� ^
31- E r- k l Si 6 /
lecat ion. He opposed extending the hours of operation to include all day
F, iday because he felt that was an entrance to a request for other weexdays.
He thought there were too many areas where t ^.e applicant was not in compliance
with the original terms of the conditions. use permit and he thought perhaps
that request could be considered after the applicant had proven they could
cperate in ccmpliance. He supported the holidays recommended by staff. He
did •._,. feel the Commisaion had enough information to make an informed
decision 'n the swap meet :Ssue. He remarked that he planned to visit the
General Dynamics swap meet on Saturday. He felt a detailed plan should be
submitted for proposals on where vendors would park, where swap most customers
and Carr.i•:al Hall customers would park, how the overlapping time would be
handled, etc. before the Commission could even consider permitting the swap
meet use.
Commissioner Chitiea agreed with staff's proposals regarding holidays. she
thought the comments made by Commissioner Melcner with regard to Friday hours
were appropriate. She supported the electronics swap meet but did not feel it
would be appropriate to allow the use in this location. She encouraged the
swap meet operators to locate in Subarea 15. She felt the matter of security
to be important and thought the security officers need to be trained and
identified by uniform.
Chairman McNiel Said he was not cppo *d to mixing the uses. He did not oppose
extending the Friday hours even though the applicant may then return to ask
for additional weekday operating hours because he felt the Commission would
have the right to refuse. He supported the six legal holidays outlined by
staff. He agreed the swap meet is valuable. He acknowledged that it may make
logical sense to tie the two uses together, but noted that it creates problems
for the city. He stated approval would set a precedent. He felt that if more
information and a better plan were presented, he may support the swap meet in
this location. He asked if it would be possible to act an Parts A, e, and C
and defer action on the swap meet use.
Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, responded affirmatively.
Commissioner Melchor noted that Chairman McNiel had indicated he was not
opposed to expanding the Friday hours of operation because he felt the City
would Still have the option of refusing future requests to expand to other
days of the week. He noted that the original promise was that there would be
no conflict with other center users because the mall would only operate on
weekend@. He felt retaining the weekend only hours would be appropriate.
ccmmissicner Valletta asked if the other Commissioners would support moving
the swap most indoors at the Carnival Mall location. She said she was not
cpposed to an indoor swap meet, but she would not support one outdoors.
Mr. Buller indicated there would have to be an amendment to the conditional
use permit to allow sale of used equipment. He thought perhaps the condition
could be worded to identify a certain indoor area could be used for the swap
meet.
Planning Commission Minutes t},7.. April 8, 1992
3c6
Coln (( 'A (! ?�
Commissioner Melchor suggested that all vendors at the swap meet section
should be required to be licensed ham operators.
Commissioner Teletoy questioned if the electronics swap meet were approved, if
the City would then have to approve other types of swap meets for other type•
of used merchandise.
Mr. Buller noted that temporary use permits are generally approved for special
sales of normal merchandise. He said staff had felt that the request was not
in the spirit of a normal temporary use permit.
Commiesioner Melchor asked that the Commissioners further discuss the
requested uses in Part A.
Chairman McNiel did not oppose any of the requested uses.
Commissioner Melchor did not feel mortgage brokers, real estate services,
travel bureaus, beauty /nail salons, or photography studios should be added.
He thought other areas of the City are batter suited for those uses.
Commissioner Chitiea agreed this is an industrial area and she felt those
types of businesses would be better placed in other areas of the City. She,
felt their inclusion in this area would diffuse the Commercial base.
Commissioner Tolstoy felt jewolry repair might be acceptable, but he did not
support the other uses.
Chairman McNiel felt there may be small, incubator businesses in all Of those
types of businesses and he thought this may be an area for them to start.
Commissioner Tolstoy noted that a travel agency would not be successful
without having expensive computer equipment.
Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Valletta, to adopt the resolution
approving Modification to Conditional Use Permit 91 -03, Part A, with
modification to only expand the uses to include Jewelry repalr services,
Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
CHITIEA,
MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
MCNIEL
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
NONE
- carried
Motion: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Chitlea, to adopt the resolution
approving Modification to Conditional Use Permit 91 -03, Part B, to expand the
hours of operation to include six legal holidays. Motion carried by the
following vote;
Planning Commission Minutes Q*_ April 8, 1992
3 i9 P,)(f4 81"( P -1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 25, 1992
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE - A
request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the
permitted uses within an existing 103,522 square foot Indoor
Wholesale/Retail Commercial use located within the General
Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229 - 262 -28.
(Continued from February 26, 1992.)
ABSTRACT: This application involves a three -part modification to
Conditional Use Permit 91 -03 and relates to the operation of the
Carnival Malls site. Part A is a request to expand the permitted uses
within the site. Part B is a request to expanr the permitted hours of
operation during holidays. Finally, Part C is a request to expand the
`:ours of operation to include Fridays, in addition to the current
weekend operations.
These modifications relate to the existing Carnival Malls site, an
indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial use. Industrial Specific Plan
Amendment 91 -03, approved by the City Council on July 3, 1991,
conditionally allows the use to locate witnln Subareas 8, 9, 10, 11, 13,
14, and 15 within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Conditional Use
Permit 91 -03 for Carnival Malls was approved by the Planning Commission
on June 25, 1991, and the use began operation in November of 1991.
Staff supports the approval of Parts A and B, with minor modifications,
as they are consistent with the intent of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan. However, Part C. the expansion of the hours of operation on
Fridays, cannot be supported by staff as the applicant has failed to
comply with the conditions of approval and lacks sufficient parking.
This report reviews each request independently and provides the
appropriate resolution for each.
APPLICANT'S REQUESTS:
Expansion of Permitted Uses: The applicant has requested that the
following uses be permitted to operate within the Carnival Malls
site: travel agencies, mortgage brokers, real estate sales, beauty
or nail salons, and photography studios. Photography studios and
travel agencies are listed under the Personal Services category.
Mortgage brokers and real estate sales are listed under the
4
Exv /6ir i;
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MOD. TG CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
March 25, 1992
Pace 2
category of Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services.
?- nally, beauty salons /nail salons are listed under the category of
Convenience Sales and Services. (See Exhibit "F ").
Staff Comments: All of the requested uses are listed under
categories that are currently conditionally permitted within
Subarea it, with the approval of the Planning Commission. These
uses will not adversely impact the existing or future uses within
Carnival Malls or the site.
Staff Recommiendation: Staff recommiends chat the Planning
Commission conditionally permit the proposed uses, as identified
above, to locate within the Carnival Malls.
S. Extension of Hours of Operation During Holidays: The applicant is
proposing to extend the existing permitted hours of operation to
include, "ALL LEGAL HOLIDAYS, such as, New Year's Day, Valentine's
Day, Lincoln's and Washington's Birthday, St. Patrick's Day, Armed
Forces Day, Memorial Day, Flag Day, Independence Day, Labor Day,
Columbus Day, United Nation's Day, Halloween, Veteran's Day,
_ Thanksgiving Day (and the day after), and the week before
Christmas." (See Exhibit "C -1. ")
Staff Comments: A majority of the days that the applicant is
proposing to operate are not legal holidays. In general, most
industrial and office businesses operate through all of the above
identified holiday=_. However, it can be reasonably argued that
most businesses shutdown or reduce operations on Independence Day,
Memorial Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. There may be
cumulative parking impacts to the existing light industrial users,
and future users on the site if the request is granted as
proposed. The parking study, submitted by the applicant in June
1991, indicates that there is a deficit of 85 parking stalls with
all existing and future site users operating at the same time (see
Alternative 3 of the attached Exhibit, "D ") on a weekday.
Additional impacts that may effect other site users are noise,
traffic, and trash. In general, other site users are not
negatively impacted by the indoor wholesale /retail commercial use
because they maintain typical hours of operation, from 7:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., while the Carnival Malls site currently operates during
peak off -set hours (i.e., Friday nights and weekends). Therefore,
the site is adequately maintained, and routine upkeep for the site
is facilitated by the off -set hours. Based upon routine site
inspections, these issues up until this point, have been adequately
mitigated. However, use of the site by Carnival Malls on a
majority of these holidays could lead to impacts to other site
users operating at the same time.
(BIT
3E1
PLANNING CCMMISSLON STAFF REPORT
800. -0 COP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
March 25, 1992
page 3
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission approve the expanded hours of operation to include the
following holidays only: Independence Day, Memorial Day,
.nenkscivrcg Day, and Christmas Day.
Expanded Hours of Operation on Fridays: In addition to requesting
expanded 'hours of operation during holidays, the applicant is
requesting that the Planning Commission extend their current hours
of operation to include Fridays from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. (See Exhibit
-1.")
Staff Comments: The applicant currently maintains the following
hours of operation:
Monday through Friday - 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 P.M.
(Incidental stacking of merchandise for vendors and
office hours for the management team - not open to the
public.)
.Friday - 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. - Retail Sales
Saturday - 10:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. - Retail Sales
Sunday - 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. - Retail Sales
The primary impact of allowing retail sales during the daytime
hours on Fridays is parking. As discussed in Part B above, the
parking study projected an 85 -space parking deficit on site for all
users operating at the same time on a weekday (see Alternative 3 of
Exhibit ")"). The parking standards applied to this alternative
are consistent with the existing Industrial Area Specific Plan and
Development Code requirements. Therefore, staff cannot support the
expansion because of the inadequacy of parking facilities on -site.
OTHER ISSUES: When this project waa originally approved, the Planning
Commission found it important to establish a compliance review for the
intended use. The condition requires that the Planning Commission
conduct a public hearing, twelve months from the date of release of
occupancy, to ensure conformance with the conditions of approval and any
other health, safety, and welfare issues (see Condition No. 16 in
Exhibit "G "). Staff has been carefully monitoring the business
operation since their opening in November of 1991. The applicant has
been in significant compliance with the conditions of approval.
4o•a eve r, staff has been working with the applicant on two outstanding
corpliance issues: (1) security and (2) business licensing.
Security - Approximately one week after the project's opening in
November 1991, Carnival Malls released their security personnel and
are in violation of this condition. Security was to be provided, a
minimum of two security personnel for the first 25,000 square feet
of leasable area, in addition to the personnel /management team.
staff has not received any security complaints from thn users,
azZ
It f
LY.N 18(7 11 -L
PLANNING CCMMISSIGA STAFF REPORT
MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - SAMES PAGE
March 25, 1992
Page 3
neighboring businesses, or the Police Department. This may be
attributed, in part, to the sluggish economy which has curtailed
their business volume.
B. Business Licensing - The Planning Division and Business Licensing
staff have worked very closely to ensure that all businesses
locating within Carnival Malls are properly licensed. At present,
approximately 38 percent of the businesses still in operation have
not been licensed (see Exhibit "E "). Though the applicant has
complied with the specific condition that a monthly list of
businesses be provided to the Planning and Business Licensing
Divisions, the intent of the condition has rot been met.
Businesses are operating without proper business licenses which
means a loss of sales tax revenue for the City.
Business Licensing has proved to be a difficult condition to
enforce. In addition to the monthly tenant list, Business
Licensing staff has had several on -site inspections on weekends in
order to educate the vendors within Carnival Malls of the Business
Licensing procedures. In reviewing this condition with the City
Attorney, staff believes the language is as strong as it can be.
Though these issues appear to be resolvable and are being addressed
by the applicant, staff believes it to be important to raise these
is saes should the Commission find them germane to the applicant's
request to expand the business operation. The condition requires
that a review be conducted in November of 1992: however, the
Commission may review a CUP at any other time deemed necessary to
ensure compliance.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT /POLICE DEPARTMENT: Roth the Fire
District and the Police Department have been notified of the proposed
use. Both departments have expressed no objection to the applicant's
request.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following
findings in order to approve this application:
A. That, the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the
objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the
Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located; and
B. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan.
FXH IBIT "4+ =.3
3 z3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MOD. TO CUP 91 -03 - JAMES PAGE
March 25, 1992
Page 5
CORRESPONDENCE; This item has been advertised as a public hearing in
the Inland Valley Daily Bu J.letin newspaper, the property has been
posted, and notices were sent to adjacent property owners within 300
ueet of the project.
RECOMIMENDAT ION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Part A and B, with modifications, of the applicant's request to expand
the permitted uses and operate during specific holidays through the
attached Resolutions of Approval. Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission deny the applicant's request to expand the hours of operation
to include Fridays through the attached Resolution of Denial. However,
if after your review, the Commission deems that there is sufficient
evidence to warrant a full compliance examination, then a public hearing
date should be chosen and properly advertised to consider possible
modification or revocation of the CUP. In that case, the applicant's
request for expansion should be continued to the same date.
;e Spec y submi ed,
Brad ler
City Planner.
BB:ALH /jfs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan
Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "C" - Applicant's Letter
Exhibit "D" - Parking Study
Exhibit "E" - Business License Hemp
Exhibit "F" - ISP Land Use Summary
Exhibit "G" - Resolution No. 91 -80
Resolution of Approval for Expanded Uses
Resolution of Approval to Operate During Specific Holidays
Resolution of Denial to Expand the Hours of Operation
9�XH IBIT It 4 �
3 zy
T +ele z
SITE PAR c REQUIIeJ =1¢KIS
Read A116 7C AW16�Fa 260 ,m Lm
ZS
— WEEKDAY —
— WEEKEND
—
TOTAL
TOTAL
SIZE
PARKPIG
SPACES
PARKAiG
SPACES
:.YYD 1:5E
TSF
RE0U00EMFNI'
[iEOI11RED
REOU6 L14Fn
REOUIRE.D
A6t,frjR t
eE u0a
Oaup,e6
100
1/11100
0
0
V
V.,
:6.]705
1(Lp0
13
IJ
0
0
Om.
V..t
.78306
IR50
153
.Wl"
26
Re W1
103352
( 000
!m
1/1000
TOTAL
5%
MO
Ah..dw 2
nduu a
Om pod
31500
1/2000
16
0
0
V1oet
24705
1 /IOOD
15
0
0
OOSz
V1 l
.76_306
Vtm
155
.6VI000
26
!ndaoe Read
100352
1.111000
M
31A000
J„ $
TOTAL
504
w
AYerlw 3
1.dw0
O=Pw
34AW
1 /1000
IB
0
0
V1
24705
11200
13
0
0
Omoe
Vwet
7L306
1250
153
.6611000
26
In000r Read
101513
1:150
in
1:350
al
TOTAL
875•
717
Read A116 7C AW16�Fa 260 ,m Lm
ZS
December lU, 1991
Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner
Planning Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91/30
Dear Anna -Lisa:
After careful consideration of our operation and its lmpact on
the City of Ranct.r.. Cucamonga, Carnival Malls is applying to the
Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a
MODIFICATION of its existing CUP at ll�iU SIXTH Street.
we are requesting the following
1) Inclusion of Personal Service Sales In addition to New
Products Sales. These Personal Services typically include,
but are not limited to travel agencies, mortgage brokers,
real estate sales, personal care, ( beauty or nail care
photography studios and other activities typical of a
personal service nature.
L) Extention of our HOURS of OPERATION to include ALL LEGAL
HOLIDAYS, such as; NEW YEARS DAY VALENTINE'S DAY, LINCOLN'S
& WASHINHTON' ^u BIRTHDA r ST. PATRICX'S DAY, AR.VED FORCES
DAY, MEMORIAL DAY, FLAG DAY, INDEPENDENCE DAY, LABOR DAY,
COLUMBUS DAY, UNITED NATION'S DAY, HALLOWEEN, VETERANS DAY,
THANKSGIVING, the day after THANKSGIVING and the Week before
CHRISTMAS.
31 Extentlon of our HOURS Of Operation on FRIDAYS to Start
at IU:UU AM. Instead of b:0u PM. and End at u:UU PM.
We are requesting this for the following reasons:
11 Service Sales are a PERMITTED USE In our LAND USE
SUB -AREA. It Is also a PERMITTED USE In the ADJACENT OFFICE
BUILDING on Site. It will be a MINOR portion of the Total
Use of the vendors in our facility. In most Other cities it
IS a PERMITTED COMMERCIAL USE. It is also part of the
EXISTING USE in the MAJOR MALLS In the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
2) Extention of Hours during HOLIDAYS mean■ EXISTING TENANTS
in the other buildings on site, during those Holidays, WILL
BE OFF. Since the surrounding area is INDUSTRIAL EVEN LESS
TRAFFIC IMPACT will occur on these Holdays for the same
reason. There should be NO TRAFFIC problem during the WEEK
BEFORE CHRISTMAS In that tnls Is a period when people take
vacations and business in our area Is generally light. ALL
COMPARABLE FACILITIES CHARGE "EXTRA RENTAL" Which means some
of our Tenants will choose NOT to STAY OPEN and some will be
tied up In FULL TIME JOBS ELSEWHERE. This Will REDUCE our
TOTAL occupancy, customer traffic and overall parking needs.
32V � "'�. 1 ;;� J
J1 PARKING STUDIES DONE ( ON COMPARABLE FACILITIES 1 IN OUR
INITIAL PARKING STUDY, SHOW THAT FRIDAY IS A -LIGHT RETAIL
DAY ". We are a FAMILY FACILITY and FRIDAY Is not a FAMILY
SHOPPING DAY. In addition, a number of our TENANTS are
EMPLOYED ELSEWHERE and DO NOT OPEN THEIR STORE ON FRIDAYS,
This 1s the reason that FRIDAYS are a "LIGHT RETAIL DAY" in
all comparable facilities.
AS per our SHARED PARKING STUDY done for the CUP, TABLE /,
ALTERNATE AS, WEEKDAY PARKING, THE REPORT SHOWS THAT "WE CAN
SAFELY OPERATE EVEN DURING THIS FRIDAY TIME PERIOD".
Of ALL the requirements for parking ava11ab111ty the Limits
under ALTERNATE 03 are the moot RESTRICTIVE, HOWEVER FOR THE
TIME PERIOD REQUESTED WE MEET EVEN THOSE REQUIREMENTS.
IT IS NOT OUR INTENT TO IMPLEMENT ALL THE REQUESTS OF THIS
MODIFICATION. HOWEVER, WE DO NOT EXPECT TO MODIFY OUR CUP ON A
YEARLY BASIS SO WE ARE MAXING "ALL" OUR REQUESTS FOR THE FUTURE
NOW!
Thank you again for your kind help.
5-im
cerel7f;�
Carnival Malls
JRP /la
32,1
RESOUMON ND. 92 -180
A PESO=CN OF THE CIW Q7SNM OF 9HE CTIY OF PANCFR)
CUCLM2r-A, allXFCFNIA, DENYING A MJDMCATION TO
CONDITIONAL LEE PMU.T NO. 91-03, PART C, FOR THE
EOWSICN OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION CN FRIDAYS, If aum
IN THE GWERAAL DOUSIRIAL DISIRICP, AND KUM43 FINDINGS
IN SUPFCFW q EREDF - APN: 229- 262 -28
A. Recitals.
(i) James Page has filed an application for a modification to
Conditional use Permit No. 91 -03 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Pesoluticn, the subject Corditional Use Permit modifica-
tion request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) on the 26th day of Ft3rUary 1992, and continued to the 25th day
of March and the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning CnniiGaon of the City of
Ramiro Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on April 8, 1992.
(iii) On the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission reviewed
the proposal and staff's presentation and received public testimony. At the
conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Comission directed staff to
prepare a Resolution of Denial for their meeting of April 22, 1992.
(iv) On the 22nd day of April 1992, the Planning Commission reviewed
staff's presentation and received public testimony. At the conclusion of the
public testimony, the Planning Commission adapted a Resolution of Denial, on
the application and concluded said hearing on April 22, 1992.
(v) On the 3rd day of June 1992, the City Council conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on June
3, 1992.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, '1HFREFURE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing on February 26, Martin 25, and April
8, 1992, including written and crag staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
37-S
(a) The application applies to property located at 11530 sixth
Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and
is presently improved with three research and development buildings and 760
parking spaces; and
(b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General
Industrial; and
(c) The Indoor Wholesale /Retail Commercial Use is located
within a General Industrial zone Subarea 11 of the Inj,,trial Are, Specific
Plan. The General Industrial zone was intended to accommodate a wide range of
light to medium manufacturing and wholesale, storage and distribution uses.
Typically, administrative office, professional, and indoor wholesale /retail
commercial uses are rot allowed to reduce potential land use conflicts. The
primary finding in permitting the use to locate within the Research and
Development Industrial Center was the fact that there would rot be any
conflict with the hours of operation of the general industrial users within
the site with off -set hours of operation on weekends only. The ancillary
nature of the indoor wholesale /retail oomercial. use on weekends only was
found to be consistent with the original intent of the General Industrial
zone. This proposal to expand the hours of operation directly conflicts with
the intent of the General I.,d„srial zone of the Industrial Specific Plan and
would conflict with cn -site busirness operations; and
(d) The original approval of the application was based on the
fact that the application world operate during different haws of operation of
other users within the center, thereby, minimizing all potential impacts to
other current site and future businesses. With the current proposal, haul of
operation on Fridays from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. would conflict with the
hays of operation of other site users, and adversely impact those businesses;
and
(e) The proposed hags of operation would conflict with the
utilization of parking facilities for other users within the site.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
oil
during the abo referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Ccermission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the prcpceecd use is not in aecorYd with the General
Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district
in which the site is located; and
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties cr improvements in the vicinity;
and
(c) That the proposed use does not comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code and Industrial Area Specific
Plan.
32°j
Pa lutim No. 92 -180
Page 3
4. Based iVm the findings and a lmims set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this [v+ia im horeW denies the applicatim.
5. ThE Se=etz y to this Ca it shall certify to the adoptim of
this Besolutim.
33D
C17 1 Oh' RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE June 17, 1992
TO Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM' Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: Conrinuinn F.dncatinn for Massnop Technicians
Recommendation:
E IM:
lm
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached ordinance which
would amend the massage technician ordinance to require continuing
education.
Background:
On March 18, 1992, the City Council approved a staff report which spelled out
the parameters to an amendment to the massage technician and establishment
ordinance. Essentially the proposed amendment. as outlined to the City
Council, would require twelve hours of continuing education each year for an
individual to renew their massage permit in the City.
The attached ordinance accomplishes the change discussed above and has been
prepared by the City Attorney's Office for your consideration. Staff
recommends approval of this amending ordinance.
R Speecctffultllyv Submitted,
DAB /dab
JUN- 8-9 2 M o N 14:30 M A R K M g N a A R C Z Y N S K I P.02-OZ
ORDINANCE NO. "i l-�-A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION
9.244220 OF CRAFTER 9.24 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL, CODE PERTAINING TO RENEWAL OF MASSAGE
TECHNICIAN LICENSES.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 9.24.220 of Chapter 9.24 is hereby
amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:
"Section 9.24.220 - Same - Requirements for Renewal
"A massage technician licensed under this
Chapter shall file an application to renew the permit
thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration
thereof. Approval shall be contingent upon satisfactory
compliance with all pertinent sections of this Chapter,
including a current medical clearance. A renewal fee,
as established by the City Council, shall be charged to
defray, in part, the cost of the renewal investigation
required by this Chapter.
"Each licensee seeking to renew a massage
technician license shall, together with the application
for renewal, provide written proof that the licensee has
successfully completed at least twelve (12) hours of
continuing education from a recognized school of massage
during the previous twelve (12) months. The application
for license renewal shall be denied if such written
proof is not provided at the time the application for
renewal is filed."
SECTION a: The City Council declares that, should any
provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance
be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a
court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive
legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs,
sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force
and affect.
SE=10 l: The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the
City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen
(15) days after its passage at least once in the JUJAnd
DAily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published n
the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
332
a
Uil y UP IiAiNUI -W UUl. H1v1U1V UN
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 17, 1992
TO Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of a R sol rtioa Reauestim, the State Lcuislaturc
Rgject Proposals to Reduce Municipal Funding
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution calling
for the State Legislature to leave municipal revenue intact.
Background:
In an attempt to resolve the almost $10 billion stale budget deficit, the
legislature has formed working groups to study possible options. One of these
working groups was given the task of looking at local government funding
and revenue. This group has been discussing a list of 76 options that would
take funding away or redistribute funding that municipal governments have
been receiving.
While it is unlikely that the working group will take action on all 76 options, it
appears they are focusing on two options that could cost Rancho Cucamonga
approximately $6 million. These options are the repeal of Assembly Bill g
which is the law outlining the manner in which property taxes are
distributed. If our property lax allocation is eliminated it could cost the City
approximately $2 million. Additionally, the working group is looking at the
City's share of Vehicle License Fees (VLF). If the state takes the VLF and
redistributes them to the county to cover state programs, it could cost Rancho
Cucamonga almost $4 million.
Our City has been acting responsibly to face the harsh economic realities we
arc confronted with. The City's actions have been painful but they were
necessary for a balanced budget. Any additional cuts in revenue will be
devastating to municipal services and could seriously impact the quality of life
in our community.
For the above reasons, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the
attached resolution and go on record as officially opposing these proposals
being considered in Sacramento.
s cct(uily Subm' cd
3
No. 92- 19(,-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THIS CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALFORNIA. CALLING ON THE
LEGISLATURE OFTHE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO REJECT
PROPOSALS TO REDUCE LEVELS OF FUNDING FOR
MUNICIPALITIES BELOW CURRENT LEVELS.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is in a state of financial crisis;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has taken actions locally to
meet the financial challenges by:
(a) Sharply reducing its operating budget for fiscal year 1992-93 by
approximately 11% from the fiscal year 1990 -91 budget. a
reduction of about S3 million.
(b) Slashing programs and levels of service.
(c) Reducing employees by 18%.
(d) Freezilg salaries for the past two years.
(e) Heavily utilizing volunteer services.
WHEREAS, any efforts by the state to reduce funds historically relied on
by cities would be devastating to municipal services and would be detrimental
to the residents of our City and to the economic and business climate of our
community; and
WHEREAS, public safety services such as law enforcement, rescue and
fire suppression arc funded by municipal funds and any further reductions to
municipal revenue will jeopardize the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby call on the Legislature of the State of
California to reject any proposal to further reduce funding to municipalities.
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council asks the legislature to
keep the property tax allocation formulas outlined by AB g intact and the
formula for the distribution of Vehicle License Fees intact so that the City may
continue providing essential services to the people of our community.
33H
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 17, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manage
FFICM: Debbie Adams, City Clerk N
SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM D11
Consent Calendar Item D11, as listed on the agenda index, includes the
filing of a Notice of Completion. Per Engineering staff, this item should
not include the filing of a Notice of Completion, and therefore, Resolution
No. 92 -191 should not be considered for approval. Council should only
consider the acceptance of the landscape improvements for Tract
13566 -1.
/dja
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
June 17, 1992
TO: Mayor and Members of the City C I
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner /11/
SUBJECT: Scheduled Report on Oral History /roject
Staff respectfully requests that Item H -i, a re rt on the City's Oral History
Project, be pulled from tonight's agenda due to an unexpected conflict in the
consultant's schedule who was to deliver the update. We plan on moving
this item to your next meeting on July 1, 1992 and apologize for any
inconvenience this may cause.
June 16, 1992
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
Attn: Engineering Division
Assessment Section
Dear Sirs:
RFc
F1v
,o
cnr� N 16 F8
Clio ,
1 moved to my home in Victoria Groves, Your District No. 2, in
April of last year. Previously, I had lived in another part of
Alta Loma.
When I received my first tax bill for this new home, I was in
shock at the amount of money allocated for landscaping. At the
time, I felt it was an outrageous amount for each homeowner to
Pay. Now, I receive notice that your department wants to raise
an already excessive bill amount. I am totally against any such
increase in fees.
Mathematically, if you take the number of homes in this district
(I am sure the number is in the tens of thousands) and multiply
that times the dollar amount already being charged, you have a
sizable budget in which to manage the landscape needs in this
community. If not, I suggest You take this .lob to outside bid-
ders who f am sure can do as adequate of a ,job in maintaining a
visual appealing atmosphere, and at the same time, be more cost
consvious with the taxpayers dollars.
Since I am unable to attend your Council meeting on June 17th, I
am sending this letter of protest.. Had I been able to attend, I
would have vocally expressed my outrage, and would have demanded
an accounting of:
1) Number of Homes in District. 2,
21 What landscape work is actually performed,
and,
3) What is the dollar amount attached to each
landscape ,job.
I am confident that a picture painted from this information could
show areas to cutback or eliminate to save dollars, not raise an
already overpriced bill..
Page 2
Opposition to Rate Increase for Landscape Maintenance
Again, as a homeowner in District 2, I am OPPOSED to any rate
increases. Instead, I support any action to supplement an in-
crease in water rates by CUTTING BACK what is already being
spent, and don't increase a BURDEN that is already being imposed
on us, the homeowners.
Thank you for your consideration of my opinion. I would appreci-
ate a follow -up to my 'letter regarding the results of the meeting
and /or answers to my 3 questions on the previous page.
Sincerely,
Mrs. Caryn L. Payzant
7073 Sterling Court
Alta Loma, California 91701
Cat � },.•�/ � ��
i
�. (inke ?)r:+rte�
9358 La Grande Street
P O. Box 42
Alta Loma, Cali`ornia 91701
714 -987 -0815
_.., at liar -.,„ C.1annng
7.ar. i ^c Cate �.r.,ga. Cs it 1 , 21)
Ger onen.
RECEIVED
JUN 2.5 jo02
CIiY OF om po On,,1ONGP
ENCRIMMS MOVDN
Jul-= 1 F. 1902
12, .r receipt of a malog 445 Landscape and Street Liyht District Newsletter. This mailing
o-i,s :iel :cd Sawn in. 13t'r.. 1992 and you expect be property owners of the community,
,c, ieeoord to <�rh mee, and actions by Wednesday. June 11th, 1992. 1 thank this a a gross
eg''!'gecce 6;: the Cir, to lease sock nothkanoo to;ust a few days prior to AC Council meeting.
/ A masona'nia ams=t of notification 4me Muld be at least two weeks to a month! A,iii he
',n coming to flnd out An &a Stale be for such notifications.
° rst !e: -r, - ny Inn r5nated a. ars p-opnibal to Increase any costs for am thing in such times as
xa,a tt'r,n '.ncudcals am 50 Of from "o; or 3cked to accept cutbacks to keep tlna: cNs.
,. :o :rcea'a'; -a Cost of whatever area La Grande and adjacent <treeis are �n
an _ 40 q-es'rrr. Same of wr .tteets have next to no ligking. and 0 there Is any pm,f
_= examp:e to s.. nt o_tside my prc?em has beei: fad:ng fo.
c-.o ^ahs cn end -,nci 7a0:ng has wil done about it Some of the streets have no MAN and fm
aa'tirg a ha angn at having to wa'Ik down the street like i was walking on eggs to avoid faij.ing
we tc gaiN =1k; c,t :nte the street irom pr<oerty owner's driveways. The City has been huse
otn an overabw dance of ^arks and c tsar (,Ills in the City but grossiy and totally neglected the
7ln" W Is Qa commuPh. be arm! r-ommun o;. Some of ti'.ese doer ant pays weal
ss:b;lr o and pown VA for accidents. As for rr:amtemnce of our streets, One made ,,,memos
tm V,avenorn_e Depertc-es over the past years in referent, to s,ch, small items as
_ �waor_ .�,ec,, sec ,.,_ _;;K •� _ At pre : vie have ; rye wi :he ", a street :w�,epz� io.
-.n&s orc so. have the colosw: ner e to ;Q for'manan,
_ 70 .. .. e ryln; it, C;t, Na "!. A cle,m sweep o! > who Is
Mn .. Ma 710 1 ? ( Its for " r u revor 1,lie ➢.ann-.
DECLARATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA
JAN SUTTON states and declares as follows:
I presently am, and at all times mentioned herein have been, the Deputy
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on
z� 6e ! a 1, / 99a , at -3:,22C _, I posted a true and
correct copy of the meeting agenda dated _ J�QYIF l� /9gc7- at
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct
and that this declaration was executed on /� /99f} at
Rancho Cucamonga,
DEBRA J. ADAMS, CMC, CITY CLERK
City of Rancho Cucamonga
BY: am -.5 _
an /Sutton, Deputy City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CITY OF
RANCFIO CUGAMONGA
CITY CM TL
AGENDA
Adjourned Meeting
June 18, 1992 - 6:00 p.m.
Tri- Communities Conference Room
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
A. CALL, TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Roll Call:
Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, Williams _, Wright __.
B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
f t � i •i 1
This is the
time and place for the general
public
to address the City
Council. State
law prohibits the City Council
from
addressing any issue
not previously
included on the Agenda. The
City
Council may receive
testimony and
set the matter for a subsequent
meeting,
Comments are to
be limited to
five minutes per individual.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
June 18, 1992
Page 2
D AD.IOURNMENT
1, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on
June 11, 1992, seventy -two (71) hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
1977
Roll Call:
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA
Adjourned Meeting
June 18, 1992 - 6:00 p.m.
Tri- Communities Conference Room
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
A. CALL TO ORDER
Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, Williams _, Wright .
t I
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992193
C. COMMUNICATION FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place
for
the general
public to address the
Redevelopment Agency.
State
law
prohibits the
Redevclopmenl Agency
from addressing any
issue not
previously included
on the Agenda. The
Redevelopment Agency
may receive
testimony and
set the matter for a
subsequent meeting.
Comments
are
to be limited
to five minutes per
individual.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA
June 18, 1992
Page 2
D. AD./OURNMENT
1, Debra 1. Adams, Assistant Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda was posted on June 12, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
Roll Call:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Adjourned Meeline
June 18, 1992 - 6:00 p.m.
Tri- Communities Conference Room
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga. California
A CALL TO ORDER
Buquet Alexander __, Stout _, Williams _, Wright _.
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992(93
C. COMMUNICATION FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place
for
the general public to
address the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection
District. State law prohibits the District
from addressing any issue
not
previously included on
the Agenda. The
District may receive testimony
and set the matter
for a subsequent
meeting. Comments are to
be
limited to five minutes
per individual.
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AGENDA
June 18, 1992
Page 2
D. ADJOURNMENT
1, Debra J. Adams, Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on June 12, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the
meeting per Government Code 549.53 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
DECLARATION or POSTING OF AGENDA
JAN SUTTON states and declares as follows:
I presently am, and at all times mentioned herein have been, the Deputy
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on
I at I Posted a true and
correct copy of the meeting agenda dated ,J u,y�,P _��. / - / "/� at
r
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct
and that this declaration was executed on �w,1k ,..� /�9cy at
Rancho Cucanonga.
DEBRA J. ADAMS, CMC, CITY CLERK
City of Rancho Cucamonga
BY:n �/�%�
Jan Sutton, Depuiy City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Roll Call:
QTY OF
RANCHO CU AMOuA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA
Adjourned Meeting
June 30, 1992 - 6:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Buquet _, Alexander __, Stout _, Williams _, Wright
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember or
member of the audience for discussion.
Approval to adopt proposed Redevelopment Agency Budget for Fiscal t
Year 1992)93.
2. Approval of annual loan transaction between the City of Rancho 4
Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency.
This is the time and place
for
the general
public to address U+e
Redevelopment Agency.
State
law
prohibits the
Redevelopment Agency
from addressing any
issue not
previously included
on the Agenda. The
Redevelopment Agency
may receive
testimony and
set the matter for a
subsequent meeting.
Comments
are
to be limited in five minutes per
individual.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA
June 30, 1992
Page 2
1, Debra J. Adams, Assistant Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda was posted on June 26, 1992, seventy-two (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA --
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 30, 1992
TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
I
FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy Director
I
BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET -- FISCAL YEAR
1992/93
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached Redevelopment Agency budget,
and approve a minute action reserving all fund equity to their respective
funds.
ANALYSIS: Attached you will find the proposed 1992/93 Redevelopment
Agency budget. Fund categories that begin with the digit one (1) represent
Administrative and Project Funds; those categories beginning with the digit
two (2) are restricted ( "Pass- Through ") accounts subject to Agency
agreements; those beginning with the digit three (3) or four (4) represent
special Trustee Funds which have been established to handle transactions on
either bond or loan programs which have been established by the
Redevelopment Agency.
How do these funds work?
Tax increment is received by the Redevelopment Agency from the County of
San Bernardino, The Redevelopment Agency, in turn, places these monies
into the restricted Pass- Through Funds according to the percentages
provided by the County Auditor- Contoller's Office. Funds contained in the
Pass - Through accounts are restricted for specific purposes, or are transferred
to the Trustee for payment to debt service on bonds sold by the Agency in
prior years. These restricted Pass - Through Funds serve to provide the
financing for such projects as the Regional Facilities Day Creek Project, the
Affordable Housing Program, and the Fire Facilities Program.
Project and Administration Fund accounts operate with �r�
revenues derived from loans, funds transfers, proceeds of 3+
bonds, interest income, and other revenue sources that are I
specifically designated for project implementation. These ��i
Budget Adoption
Fiscal Year 1992/93
Page 2
project funds offer more flexibility in terms of implementation of programs
established by the Redevelopment Agency, in that they are not restricted by
Prior Pass - Through Agreements which were established with other taxing
entities at the time the Project Area was adopted.
As with the adoption of the previous fiscal year's budget, the Agency's
auditor is recommending that a minute action he taken reserving any fungi
equity for the projects applicable to each fund. This has no detrimental
effect on the Agency budget, and is consiste.rlt with the recommendations of
the California Redevelopment Associziion.
Staff recommends that the Agency reaffirm the following policy.
POLICY
All fund equity shall be reserved for the projects applicable to each fund.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda D. Daniels
Deputy Director
2
(.1
County �—� RDA
FUNDS ORGANIZATION CONCEPT
10 RDA Admin
Fund
I11 Day Creek
Project Fund
12 Regional
Affordable Shop. Ctr.
Housing Project Fund
Regional 13 Central
Facilities I _ I Park
Non-Reclaimable 1 Special Trustee H Trustee I City b30 RDA 14 Sports
Water I ' I Complex
Mlliken
Water antl I I I I I H 15 Uinderrpass
Fire I 16 Foothill
Protection I! Boulevard
Tax Increment repays
17 I-15/Foothill
Interchange
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 30, 1992
TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy Director
BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ANNUAL LOAN TRANSACTION BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the repayment and re- borrowing of the
annual loan between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency.
BACKGROUND: In order to receive tax increment revenue, the
principal source of redevelopment funding, a Redevelopment Agency
must demonstrate existing debt which will be repaid by the tax
Increment received. For this purpose, when the Project Arco was
established in Fiscal Year 1982/83, the City loaned money to the
Redevelopment Agency in order to establish initial debt, as well as to
provide monies for operations. For debt purposes, the City and Agency
have continued to maintain this loan from the City, thus ensuring the
Agency's receipt of its full tax increment revenue.
ANALYSIS: Each Fiscal Year, the Redevelopment Agency repays the
loan to the City, including interest, with tax increment revenues, after
paying all debt on outstanding bonds and agreements.
During Fiscal Year 1991/92, the Redevelopment Agency is able to pay
to the City approximately $4,437,636 towards the principal and
interest on the City /Agency loan. At the present time, It is necessary
for the Agency to continue a portion of the loan with the City, In order
to show sufficient debt to receive the full amount of tax increment
revenue. Therefore, it Is necessary for the City to authorize the
Agency to re- borrow the amount of $3,727,736. This will leave an
outstanding loan balance of $9,107.794.
Respectfully submitted,
i'
Linda D. Daniels
Deputy Director
q
c`c^MO,yc
/ '� RANCHO CUCAMONGA
4 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
0
F is
AGENDA
1977
Adiourned Me�-,tinz
June 30. 1992 - 6:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call:
Buquet _, Alexander Stout _, Williams _, Wright _.
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non.
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire District Board at one
time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember or
member of the audience for discussion.
L Approval to amend the fiscal year 1991/92 appropriations. I
2. Approval to adopt the Fire District's General Fund preliminary 12
budget for fiscal year 1992/93.
3. Approval to adopt the Fire District's fiscal year 1992/93 Article 13
X11113.
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AGENDA
June 30, 1992
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO, FD 92 -018 14
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIiIB
OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1992/93
4. Approval to set a public hearing for September 16, 1992 to consider 15
adoption of the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for fiscal
year 199/93.
C. COMMUNICATION FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the lime
and place
for
the general public to
address the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District, State law prohibits the District
from addressing
any issue
not
previously included on
the .Agenda. The
District may receive testimony
and set the matter
for a subsequent
meeting. Comments
are to
be
limited to five minutes
per individual.
D, ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on June 26, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the
meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 30, 1992
TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM: L. D. Michael, Fire Chief
BY: Alex Ahumada
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 APPROPRIATIONS
RECOMMENDATION
Approve all fiscal year 1991 -92 budgetary adjustments for the General and Capital Accounts.
BACKGROUND
When the budget development process begins, staff is actually projecting estimated revenues
and appropriations fourteen to sixteen months ahead of anticipated needs.
In general, estimated revenues and appropriations have been adjusted to reflect a more
realistic level of activity in all accounts. There has been no shift of estimated revenues and
appropirations which changes from the direction the Board has requested of staff. Capital
improvement programs, as they are addressed, are approved as separate Board items
throughout the year.
The attached schedules submitted for your review indicate the prior year actual revenues and
expenditures, the current year (1991 -92) adopted budget amounts, and the 1991 -92
recommended adjusted amount in each account area.
Respectfully Submitted,
L. D. Michael
Fire Chief
Attachments
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DiS T RiG T
FISCAL YEAR 1992 - -93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1990 = 104,887 Est. 110,130
a
ADOPTED
REVISED
FISCAL
BUDGET
BUDGET
ACCOUNT
YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCALYEAR
CODE
DESCRIPTION
1990— 1991
1991 — 1992
1991 — 1992
GENERAL FUND
(1) TAXES
01 -4000 Property Tax — ClY secured
3,066,953
3,698,450
3,625,048
01 -4020 Property Tax — CN unsecured
246,537
250,000
225,000
01 -4025 Prop Tax — Pry sec & unsec
27,017
30,000
27,000
01 -4050 Property Tax— penaltieslinterest
4,177
3,000
2,700
01 -4070 Supplemental Property Taxes
104,233
100,000
90,000
01 -4030 Unitary Utility Tax
366,24D
360,000
324,000
01 -4060 Augmentation — DistricVSupplemantal
1,310,841
1,210,845
1.210,841
Total Taxes
5,125,998
5.652,295
5,504,589
(2) FINES & FORFEITS
01 -4090 Fines& Forfeitures
3,274
4,000
4,400
Total Fines & Forfeits
3274
4000
4400
a
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1990 = 104,887 Est 110,130
TOTAL G--NERAL FUND _5,804 559-- __ 403,000 -__- 6;177 638_,______
nw9293.wk1
3
ADOPTED
REVISED
FISCAL
BUDGET
BUDGET
ACCOUNT
YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
CODE
DESCRIPTION
1990- 1991
1991 - 1992
1991 - 1992
(3) MISCELLANEOUS
01 -4100 Interest
166,871
155,000
175,215
01 -3901 Sale of Fixed Assets
12,217
0
0
01 -3901 Other Revenue
54,676
10.000
10.000
Total Miscellaneous
233,764
165000
185.215
(4) CHARGES FOR SERVICES
01 -4130 Plan Check Fees
131,982
199,755
111,679
Total Charges for Services
131,902
199,765
111,679
(5) OTHERS
01-4086 Reimbursement From RDA
134,541
82,950
71,755
01-3999 Reimbursement From City
175,000
300,000
300,000
Total Others
309,541
382,950
371755
TOTAL G--NERAL FUND _5,804 559-- __ 403,000 -__- 6;177 638_,______
nw9293.wk1
3
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTE-CTION DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
1990191 1991192 1991192
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED ESTIMATED
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0 FYE BUDGET EXPENDITURES
1 -10
01 -10 -5100
01 -10 -5220
01 -10 -5975
01- 10 -596X
01 -10 -6101
01 -10 -6402
D1 -10 -6409
01 -10 -6407
01 -10 -6510
01 -10 -6600
01 -10 -6653
01 -10 -6660
01 -10 -6700
01 -10 -6730
01 -10 -6732
01 -10 -6736
01 -10 -6739
D1 -10 -6800
D1 -10 -6801
01 -10 -6802
01 -10 -6822
01 -10 -6844
)1 -10 -6850
D1 -10 -7043
D1 -10 -7044
31 -10 -7045
SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT, BY OBJET ACCOUNT
FIRE SAFETY
REGULAR SALARIES
OVERTIME SALARIES
PART TIME SALARIES
FRINGE BENEFITS
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
PUBLICATIONS & SUBSCRIPTNI
EMPLOYEE TUITION REIMBURS
(RE) CERTIFICATION COSTS
SAFETY GEAR & CLOTHING
TELEPHONE
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
FIRE INCIDENT COSTS & FOOD
MEMBERSHIPS & DUES
OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIP
POSTAGE
COMPUTER SOFTWARE & ACC:
REPAIR OF OFFICE EOUIPMEN7
PLAN CHECK CONSULTING FEE
PUBLIC EDUCATION MATERIAL:
INVEST SUPPLIES & ECUIP
CONTRACT SERVICES
SPECIALIZED TOOLS & EQUIP
SPEC TOOLS & EOUIP /SCBA
CAPITAL - BUILDINGS
CAPITAL - EGUPMENT
CAPITAL- VEHICLES
36
19,577
3,573
1,181
74
2,550
6,000
357
10
297
6,738
0
1,691
0
18,484
8,850
416
3,250
86
0
15,227
7,762
31,145
-10 TOTAL: ( I 594,597
17,41
20,76
146.1E
6,511
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
1990/91 1991/92 1991/92
ACTUALEXP 8 ADOPTED ESTIMATED
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM Q FYE BUDGET EXPENDITURES
SIIMMARV RV nr:PARTMFNIT RV (1R. IFCT AOPn1 IIJT
01 -20
COMMUNICATIONS
01 -20 -5100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
p
01 -20 -5220
OVERTIME SALARIES
0
0
0
01 -20 -5975
PART TIME SALARIES
0
0
0
01- 20 -598X
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
01 -20 -6901
COMM, SUPPLIES, 8 REPAIRS
5,346
12,880
1,864
01 -20 -6924
EMERG BEEP EQUIP 8 REPAIRS
0
1,970
0
01 -20 -7043
CAPITAL - BUILDINGS
0
0
0
01 -20 -7044
CAPITAL - EQUPMENT
6,016
3,500
3,500
01 -20 -7045
CAPITAL - VEHICLES
0
0
0
01 -20 TOTAL:
11,362
18,350
5,364
S
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
1990191 1991192 1991192
ACTUALEXPB ADOPTED ESTIMATED
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0 FYE BUDGET EXPENDITURES
SUlk!MIIOV GV DE! AnYLArMT MV nO 1=nT A0Pnl 1NT
01 -21
MAINTENANCE
01 -21 -5100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
0
01 -21 -5220
OVERTIME SALARIES
0
0
0
01 -21 -5975
PART TIME SALARIES
0
0
0
01- 21 -598X
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
01 -21 -6101
TRAVEL B MEETINGS
2,389
2,970
64
01 -21 -6402
PUBLICATIONS SUBSCRIPTNS
414
405
801
01 -21 -6510
SAFETY GEAR 4 CLOTHING
985
0
0
01 -21 -6700
MEMBERSHIPS B DUES
45
160
0
01-21-6730
OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIP
350
1,000
236
01 -21 -6822
CONTRACT SERVICES
866
1,765
588
01 -21 -6843
UNIT EQUIP ACCS B REPAIRS
531
1,500
0
01 -21 -6844
SPECIALIZED TOOLS B EQUIP
3,228
9,125
1,317
01 -21 -6906
SHOP EQUIPMENT& REPAIRS
1,672
1.500
430
01 -21 -6910
GASOLINE FOR FLEET
2,452
21,000
12,860
01 -21 -6911
DIESEL FUEL FOR FLEET
33,551
22,000
23,268
01 -21 -6920
VEHICLE REPAIR
74,414
74,860
24,146
01-21-6922
VEHICLE SUPPLIES & PARTS
24,469
28,500
14,563
01 -21 -6923
MAJOR VEHICLE OVERHAULS
17,106
4,500
998
01 -21 -7043
CAPITAL - BUILDINGS
0
0
0
01 -21 -7044
CAPITAL- EQUPMENT
6,739
0
0
01 -21 -7045
CAPITAL- VEHICLES
45,259
132,318
0
01 -21 TOTAL;
214,472
301,603
79,271
V.3
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
1990191 1991192 1991192
ACTUALEXP& ADOPTED ESTIMATED
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM FYE BUDGET EXPENDITURES
C11\4 IARY GV VEPA13T\ICN RV nU IPcT Arrnl IMT
01 -30
ADMINISTRATION
01 -30 -5100
RE GULAR SALARIES
668,893
679,875
676,745
01 -30 -5220
OVERTIME SALARIES
58,334
46,962
112,488
01 -30 -5975
PART TIME SALARIES
4,767
22,313
57,261
01- 30 -598X
FRINGE BENEFITS
311,097
322,332
330,537
01 -30 -6101
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
5,098
10,765
6,319
01 -30 -6402
PUBLICATIONS & SUBSCRIPTNS
1,087
3,525
1,949
01-30-6406
EMPLOYEE TUITION REIMBURS
0
23,500
1,500
01 -30 -6600
TELEPHONE
10,714
12,720
7,816
01 -30 -6653
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
357
14,840
751
01 -30 -6660
FIRE INCIDENT COSTS & FOOD
10
1,060
230
01 -30 -6700
MEMBERSHIPS& DUES
1,323
815
285
01 -30 -6730
OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIP
20,790
16,430
18,169
01 -30 -6732
POSTAGE
1,346
4,500
1,035
01 -30 -6736
COMPUTER SOFTWARE & ACCS
792
1,590
1,866
01 -30 -6821
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
48,000
55,500
72,691
01 -30 -6822
CONTRACT SERVICES
232,3 11
387,596
358,229
01 -30 -6826
DEBT SERVICE INTEREST
0
100,000
116,969
01 -30 -6860
ELECTRICAL USAGE
0
8,350
5,206
01 -30 -6861
NATURAL GAS USAGE
0
0
0
01 -30 -6864
WATER &SEWER USAGE
0
0
353
01 -30 -6900
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE
842
4,120
1,984
01 -30 -6960
GENERAL LIABILITY
65,329
75,000
64,409
01 -30 -7043
CAPITAL - BUILDINGS
0
7,000
0
01 -30 -7044
CAPITAL- EOUPMENT
30,874
241,710
142,353
`01 -30 -7045
I
CAPITAL - VEHICLES
0
0
0
01 -30 TOTAL:
1,461,964
2,040,503
1,979,225
I
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED. EXPENDITURES
1990191 1991/92 1991192
ACTUALEXP& ADOPTED ESTIMATED
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM FYE BUDGET EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT BY OBJECT ACCOUNT
01 -49
OPERATIONS
01 -40 -5100
REGULAR SALARIES
1,630,676
1,754,319
1,764,373
01 -40 -5220
OVERTIME SALARIES
628,425
483,556
606,698
01-40-5975
PART TIME SALARIES
0
0
0
01- 40 -598X
FRINGE BENEFITS
793,878
874,155
902,935
01 -40 -6510
SAFETY GEAR & CLOTHING
0
24,360
26,660
01 -40 -6600
TELEPHONE
6,064
14,385
11,121
01 -40 -6651
HOUSEHOLD EXPENSE
0
2,635
2,225
01 -40 -6653
KITCHEN REPLACE ITEMS
307
2,590
3,928
01-40-6730
OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIP
460
0
1,499
01 -40 -68:2
CONTRACT SERVICES
9,192
1,540
9,348
01-40-6828
LICENSES, PERMITS, & FEES
0
0
600
01 -40 -6844
SPEC TOOLS & EOUIP(HAZ MAT
0
0
0
01 -40 -6850
SPEC TOOLS & EQUIP(SCSA)
21,705
7,365
5,C25
01-40-6851
EQUIP, SUPPLIES, & REPAIRS
1,195
16,985
10,556
01 -40 -6860
ELECTRICAL USAGE
15,410
33,300
26,027
01 -40 -6861
NATURAL GAS USAGE
4,462
5,000
71791
01 -40 -6863
DISPOSAL SERVICE
114
0
0
01 -40 -6864
WATER &SEWER USAGE
2,087
2,250
2,291
01 -40 -6900
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE
55,206
43,000
37,959
01 -40 -6924
EMERG RES EQUIP & REPAIR
0
0
300
01 -40 -7043
CAPITAL- BUILDINGS
1,060
15,570
13,750
01 -40 -7044
CAPITAL- EOUPMENT
0
0
0
01 -40 -7045
CAPITAL- VEHICLES
25,310
0
0
01 -40 TOTAL:
3,195,551
3,280,940
3,433,686
I
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED_ EXPENDITURES
1990/91 1991;92 1991/92
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED ESTIMATED
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM FVE BUDGET EXPENDITURES
S I uAMARV BY nca4orur MT VIV nn IcCT AcrnnuT
01 -50
PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT
01 -50 -5100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
0
01 -50 -5220
OVERTIME SALARIES
0
4,240
0
01 -50 -5975
PART TIME SALARIES
0
0
0
01- 50 -598X
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
01 -50 -6101
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
22,728
39,204
28,939
01 -50 -6402
PUBLICATIONS & SUBSCRIPTNS
5,845
7,200
5,018
01 -50 -6407
(RE) CERTIFICATION COSTS
407
2,850
435
01 -50 -6700
MEMBERSHIPS & DUES
455
835
570
01 -50 -6730
OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIPMEN
471
2,910
608
01 -50 -6736
COMPUTER SOFTWARE & ACCS
466
850
300
01 -50 -6822
CONTRACT SERVICES
1,737
4,120
4,780
01 -50 -6844
SPECIALIZED TOOLS &EQUIP
6,537
4,560
1,012
01 -50 -6901
EQUIP, SUPPLIES, & REPAIRS
469
0
126
01 -50 -7043
CAPITAL- BUILDINGS
0
0
0
01 -50 -7044
CAPITAL- EOUPMENT
19,951
1,900
1,440
01 -50 -7045
CAPITAL - VEHICLES
0
0
0
01 -50 TOTAL:
59,066
68,669
43,228
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
1990 "91 1991192 1991192
ACTUALEXPB ADOPTED ESTIMATED
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM FYE BUDGET EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT BY OBJECT ACCOUNT
01-60
EMERGENCY MED SERVICES
01 -60 -5100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
0
01 -60 -5202
OVERTIME SALARIES
0
0
0
01 -60 -5975
PARTTIME SALARIES
0
0
0
01- 60 -598X
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
01 -60 -6101
TRAVEL B MEETINGS
0
4,860
2,524
01 -60 -6402
PUBLICATIONS 8 SUBSCRIPTNS
0
0
0
01 -60 -6407
(RE) CERTIFICATION COSTS
0
0
810
01 -60 -6670
GENERAL OPER SUPPLIES /MED
8,905
16,790
13,172
01 -60 -6700
MEMBERSHIPS 8 DUES
0
25
100
01 -60 -6730
OFFICE SUPPLIES 6 EQUIP
0
0
1,097
01 -60 -6822
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
0
01 -60 -7043
CAPITAL- BUILDINGS
0
0
0
01 -60 -7044
CAPITAL - EQUIPMENT
0
17,030
14,580
01 -60 -7045
CAPITAL- VEHICLES
0
0
0
01 -60 TOTAL:
8,905
38,705
32,283
ID
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
1990191 1991/92 1991/92
ACTUALEXP & ADOPTED ESTIMATED
.ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM @ FYE BUDGET EXPENDITURES
- SUMMARY BY DFPARTMRMT RV nR. IFCT ACrnllMT
01 -70
DISASTER PREP
01 -70 -5100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
0
01 -70 -5220
OVERTIME SALARIES
0
13,800
0
01 -70 -5975
PART TIME SALARIES
0
0
0
01- 70 -598X
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
01 -70 -6101
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
0
5,050
1,188
01 -70 -6407
(RE) CERTIFICATION COSTS
0
0
150
01 -70 -6670
GENERAL OPER SUPPLIES/018
107
2,050
1,950
01 -70 -7043
CAPITAL - BUILDINGS
0
0
0
01 -70 -7044
CAPITAL - EQUPMENT
0
0
0
01 -70 -7045
CAPITAL- VEHICLES
0
0
0
01 -70 TOTAL:
107
20,900
3,288
- RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 30, 1992
TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF THE FIRE DISTRICTS GENERAL FUND PRELIMINARY
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
RECOMMENDATION
Consideration of adopting the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District General Fund Preliminary
Budget for fiscal year 1992193 in the amount of $6,535,170.
BACKGROUND
The Health and Safety Code, commencing with Section 13890, requires that fire
protection districts: (1) adopt a preliminary budget on or before June 30th of each
year, (2) that on or before June 30th, a public notice regarding a hearing on the final
budget must be published, and (3) that on or before October list of each year, the Board
shall adopt its final budget.
The proposed preliminary budget has been adjusted several times by management staff to
meet budgetary, staffing and program objectives in or:ier to achieve a balanced budget
with revenues generated during fiscal year 1992/93. Tints was accomplished through
budgetary reviews by District staff and several meetings with the City Manager's budget
team.
On May 5th, the Public Safety Commission conducted a public budget workshop to review
and subsequently approved the proposed budget for Board consideration. On June 4th and
18th, the City CounciVBoard conducted a comprehensive budget workshop to review and
comment upon all proposed budgets. As part of your workshop, the District's
preliminary budget was presented. j
The preliminary budget, as currently proposed, is now ready for your consideration of
adoption.
I would respectfully request that you bring your copies of the
preliminary General Fund budget previously submitted to you for the
June 30th Board meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
L. Dennis Michael
Fire Chief
LDM /ARA /ss
Attachment
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
STAFF REPORT
rT
DATE: June 30, 1992
TO. President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief
BY: Alexander R. Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ARTICLE XIII -B APPROPRIATIONS
Approval of a resolution establishing the General Fund appropriations limit for fiscal
year 1992 -93 in the amount of $7,656,040 pursuant to Article XIII -B of the
California Constitution.
The State of California Constitution Article XIII -B requires that an appropriations limit
be established annually by the Board of Directors. The factors utilized in annually
calculating the appropriations limit are: (1) the annual percentage change In
population, and (2) the percentage change in the California per capita personal income.
The State Department of Finance has determined the factors for FY 1992/93
appropriations calculations to be a 5.19/ change in population and .9936% of the
previous years per capita income.
ANALYSIS
The following calculations illustrate the methodology utilized in arriving at the revised
appropriations limit for fiscal year 1992/93:
Fiscal year 1991/92 appropriations limit: $7,326,350
California per capita personal income: .9936%
Rancho Cucamonga population change: 5.19
Calculation factor for fiscal year 1992/93: .9936 x 1.0519 - 1.0452
Appropriations limit for fiscal year 1992/93: $7,326,350 x 1.0452 - $7,657,500.
Respectfully submitted,
/
L.L. Dennis Mich
Fire Chief
LDM /ARA /ss
Attachment
12) ...... --- --
RESOLUTION NO. FO 92.01
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIII -B OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION
WHEREAS, Article XIII -B of the Constitution of the State of California provides that the
total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government for
the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise
provided in Sections (5), (7) and (8) of said Article XIII -B. These exclusions are: Debt
Service Funds, Revenue Bonds, Federal Funds and Grants, Contingencies, Emergencies,
Enterprise Funds, Capital Improvement Carry- Overs, Capital Equipment, Intra- Governmental
Service Funds, Reserves for Workers' Compensation, Long -Term Disability, Retirement,
Unemployment and other reserve funds that are deemed reasonable and proper per the
aforementioned sections; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIII -B of the Constitution of the State of California,
the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District deems it to be in the
best interests of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to establish an appropriations
limit for the fiscal year 1992 -93; and
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has determined that said
appropriations limit for the fiscal year 1992.93 be established In the amount of $7,657,500.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED Ay the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District that an appropriations limit for the fiscal year 1992/93 pursuant to
Article XIII -B of the Constitution of the State of California be established in the amount of
$7,657,500 and the same is hereby established.
RE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein established may be
changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the Board of Directors.
Fiscal CPI Pop Net Current Appropriation
Yaa[ Ghanoe Chame Chance Increase L1W
90/91 1.0421 1.0918 1.1378 $799,082 $6,597,938
91/92 1.0414 1.0663 1.1104 $728,412 $7,326,350
92/93 .9936 1.0519 1.0452 $331,150 $7,657,500
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1992.
RWICHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
/ss
Dennis L. Stout, President
1`1
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISIRICT
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 30, 1992
TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief
BY: Alexander R. Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer
SUBJECT: PUBUC HEARING FOR ADOPTION OF FINAL BUDGET
Approval to schedule September 16, 1992 for an advertised public hearing to consider
adoption of the Fire District General Fund Final Budget for fiscal year 1992193.
BACKGROUND
Section 13893 of the Health and Safety Code (see Exhibit "A") requires publication of
notice regarding the adoption of a preliminary budget and the date, time and place the
Board will meet to adopt its final budget.
The District board is required to adopt its preliminary budget by June 30th of each year.
Public notice requirements shall also be accomplished by June 301h. Exhibit 'B"
illustrates the public notice advertisement which will be published in accordance with
the Health and Safety Code.
Respectfully submitted,
Fire Chief
LDM /ARA /ss
Attachments
;1
HEALTH At
§13890 HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
Dnuion 9 (eso
the Budgeting Procedusm for Special Districts (couuueo ®` with Section 1121) of, 1VJe 2 of the
budget ahad] b.
Califorula Administrative Code.
(Added by Bbl
(Added by Sbb.1987, . 1013, 1 11.)
Hies
1 1]391. Appropriatlan hub
F I"Wm.
M L 1 1389
On or after July I of each year, the mamas eat forth to the prelimhury budget, except obligations
1 to
for fixed assets and new permNent employee positions, see deemed appropriated until the district
board adopts the foul budget If the district baud has out adopted a preliminary budget, the
1 IML All.
amounts deemed appropriated shall be based on the budget of the prn'eding yew, excluding fixed
saseta and new permaneat employee positions,
The auditor ,
(Added by Sbb.1987, c. 1013, 4 11.)
property lox re
Ne Reeenue u
1 13892. lvmasueey of meson b sxeet eepoAltares: resolution
(Added by Sant
If the district bored d terad. that the amnuct of move for the colons, feel year will be
_ — even
bu dequwe to meet the amount of expenditures needed to pro act life and property, the Irmlhrwlwy
I#3 tamss
budget shall propose metk& of ndsing adaqusb revesun or reducing service.
Fwaw 1 I3tat
(Added by Sbb.1987, c. 1018, 1 11.)
1 IQ
tWnlul r Barnes tMr
1 13197. Horn
IM teamsuw
Forty 1 13191 � repeal 07 3asalan. c 1013.
A district con
1 In. ....
(commencing w
113!13. Notice earexnlng busiest, WAIcatiou
putt b But
(Added by Sbti
(1 On or before Joan 90 of eseh yes, a district baud shall publish •soar abtisg all of the
felbwisg:
1131fA Aoes
(1) Thet it his adopted a prelietmuy budget which is available for irupection at a time and place
A district ms
within the district specified in the notice.
afinuat, or late
(2) The date, time, sad plan when the based will mat to adopt the final budget and that any
(Added by Slob
person may appear and be beard regarding any item in the budget or regarding the addition of other
'less.
1 13819. Tax s
(b) The annex shag be published purevant to Seetios 6018 of the Oovemnest Code in at oast one
All boxes and
newspaper of general circulation in the district. The fixed pablintioo shall be at Iesxt ram weal.
exasssmant tall
before the data of the meeting. H thews no newspaper published In the district, the online shall be
collectod, the to
posted in these public pin in the district " least two weeks before the data of the meeting.
Except as p xei
(Added by Sbb.1997, c. 1013, 1 lld
Section 29112 of
xl.wed r 1rar.r reel.
(Added by State
rrs7 tywlw
4 13M. Apes
Form 1 13893 .ar npeW by frsalw9, c 1013,
1 is
At soy week
.ate of the total
1 ISM. Healy MsHudoerf a budget
following..
At the time and plane specified fes the meeting. any person may appear and be heard mgudmg
(a) Bahamas a
pretiOes'
easy item in the budg, or regarding the adIblam of other items. The hearing on the Petiminwy
budget nay be coation ed from time to time.
(b) Desipsaio
(Added by Steb.19117, a 1013, 1 11.)
general rqu°q
(c) Amounts .
IHassas r sums elms
budget deriraf 1
un 1'ililiiles
(Added by State
Paw 1 13111 w rmeM by 3realar, c 1013.
1 16
1 13991. Ennis
1 13899. Adoption at new Mdgat
If it finds the,
senders, rextae
On or Wm October I of and yeas, after malting any chsages to the preliminary budget, the
xx ricex. ambuk.
board shall adopt a find budgeL no fled bddpt chall establish Its appropriation Ihnh panusot m
AddhA
AddMmis ar ahrgw Bedlmise by is1Hi8Mt thatedole by Mt'"" • s s
48
c=>1f31�f� r,
� �P
A C - C U %+ M O N G P,
EIRE PROTECTION DIoSTRICT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board of
Directors has adopted its General Fund Preliminary Budget for Fiscal
Year 1992/93. The preliminary budget is available for public
inspection by interested taxpayers from 8:00 a.m, to 5:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday at the District office located at 6623
Amethyst Street, Rancho Cucamonga,
The Board of Directors will meet on September 16, 1992 at
7:00 p.m. at the Civic Center Council Chambers located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, for the purpose of adopting
the final budget. Any person may appear and be heard regarding any
item in the budget or the addition of other items.
/ss
L. Denms Michaels it ---'
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District
Exhibit "B"
1-1
C7N OF
RANC7-10 COCAMONGA
CITY tCMNCIL
LL T A1/l_F N lye
( YJVl�I41
1977
Adjourned Meeting
June 30, 1992 - 6:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
1. Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Roll Call:
Buquet _, Alexander Stout _, Williams _, Wright
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the City Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or
member of the audience for discussion.
I. Approval to amend fiscal year 1991/92 appropriations.
2. Approval to amend salary Resolution No. 91 -174.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -197
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -174 AND IMPLEMENTING SALARY
AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
1
77
78
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
June 30, 1992
Page 2
3. Approval of annual loan transaction between the City of Rancho 92A
Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency.
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements.
The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
APPROVAL TO ADOPT FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 BUDGET AND ARTICLE 93
XIIIB.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -198 96
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE
CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 BUDGET
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -199 97
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESFABLISHING AN
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB
OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1992/93
This is the
time and place for
the general
public
to address the City
Council. State
law prohibits the City Council
from
addressing any issue
not previously
included on the
Agenda. The
City
Council may receive
testimony and
set the matter for
a subsequent
meeting.
Comments are to
be limited to
five minutes per
individual.
1, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on
June 26, 1992, ,seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive,
-
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
41'r - ti
DATE:
June
30,
1992
TO:
Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
Jack
Lam,
AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Susan
M.
Neely, Finance Officer
SUBJECT:
AUTHORIZATION
TO AMEND FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 APPROPRIATIONS
Approve all fiscal year 1991 -92 budgetary adjustments for the
General and Capital /Special Revenue funds.
When the budget development process begins, staff is actually
projecting estimated revenues and appropriations fourteen to
sixteen months ahead of anticipated needs.
In general, estimated revenues and appropriations have been
adjusted to reflect a more realistic level of activity in all
funds. There has been no shift of estimated revenues and
appropriations which digresses from the direction Council has
requested of staff. Capital improvement programs, as they are
addressed, are approved as separate Council items throughout the
year.
The attached schedules submitted for your review indicate the prior
year actual revenues and expenditures, the current year's (1991 -92)
adopted budget amounts, and the 1991 -92 adjusted amount in each
account area.
Respectfully submitted,
%Z��
Susan M. Neely
Finance Officer
smn:wp \amndbud
Attachments
REVENUE
SUMMARY
pl-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
GENERAL FUND
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
ACCOUNT
CODE
DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
REVENUE
FISCAL YEAR
1990 - 1991
BUDGETED
REVENUE
FISCALYEAR
1991 - 1992
REVISED
REVENUE
ESTIMATE
1991 -1992
(1)
TAXES
01 -3900
1020
Property Tax - CWY secured
1,967,342
2,548,350
2,165,220
01 -3900
1030
Property Tex - C/Y unsecured
117,942
261,050
261,430
01 -3900
1040
Prop Tax - P/Y sec & unsec
99,074
100,700
126,810
01 -3900
1060
Property Tex- penaltiearinterest
55,636
56,940
54,540
01 -3900
lost
Suppi meraal Tars
133,548
116,300
110,000
01 -3900
1075
Unitay Tax
73,150
60,000
60,000
01 -3900
1100
Sales & Use Tun
5,729,225
5,509,000
6,400,000
01 -3900
1185
Transient Occupen,Cy Tax
6,658
5,000
5,000
01 -3900
1190
Adnxssons Tax
17,537
16,500
10,900
01 -3900
1800
Property Transfer Tax
232,147
258,000
275,000
01 -3901
4550
Franchise Fee- Gas& Electric
1,073,187
1,049,960
1,151,880
01 -3901
4551
Franchise Fee - Residential Refuse
375,679
223,760
280,000
01- 3901
4552
Frenchlee Fee - Commerclw Refuse
µ2,77O
272,980
25:000
01 -3901
.0063
Franchise Fee - Cable TV
372,989
342,460
360,000
Total Taxes
10 898 890
10 920000
11 510 460
W.r .,.W
3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED_ REVENUE
GENERALFUND
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
wrrtv .kI
4
AERIAL
BUDGETED
REVISED
REVENUE
REVENUE
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE
DESCRIPTION
1990 - 1991
1991 - 1992
1991 - 1992
(2) LICENSES d PERMITS
01- 3900
2200
Business Licenses
752,931
917,600
797,000
01- 3901
2220
Bicycle Licenses
354
250
250
01- 3901
2290
Building Permits
867,679
1,392,300
457,000
01 -3901
2300
Other Licenses 6 Permits
7,531
7,500
9,000
Total Licenses & Permits
1 628 195
2,247,650
1,233,
(3) FINES 8 FORFEITS
01 -3901
2460
Vehicle Coda Fines
210,723
229,000
198,000
01 -3901
2461
Parking Citations
12.433
0
92,000
01 -3901
3450
General Ordinance Fines
27,115
30,000
20,000
01- 3901
3451
Penal Code Fines
0
200
0
01- 3901
3452
Plea Bargain Fee
1,000
1,000
0
Total Fines & Forfeits
251.271
260.200
310000
wrrtv .kI
4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
GENERALFUND
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
ACCOUNT
CODE
DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
REVENUE
FISCAL YEAR
1990 - 1991
BUDGETED
REVENUE
FISCALVEAR
1991 - 1992
REVISED
REVENUE
ESTIMATE
1991 - 1992
(4)
MISCELLANEOUS
01 -3W1
4600
Rents 6 Leases
0
100
0
01- 3901
4600
Interest Earnings
0
418,000
0
01- 3901
4610
Interest Earnings Re RDA Loan
0
300,000
300,000
01 -3901
7910
Sale W Printed Materials
54,750
58,2W
54,000
01 -3901
7950
Returned Item Charge
300
300
340
01 -3901
8610
outer Revenue
24,651
20,000
5,500
01 -3W1
8740
Sale of Machinery 6 Equipment
14.155
1,000
1,100
M -3001
6780
62k of Lana
0
0
0
01 -3901
8911
Penalty
28,335
210
0
01 - 3901
W13
CummpYty Voluntary Recycl. Rog.
2,240
530
1,640
01- 3901
8523
Recycable Material
0
320
0
01 -3901
8524
Recyceble Materiel - While Paper
103
210
0
Total Miscellarwou8
124624
798870
3627
ueew3.MI
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
GENERALFUND
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
REVISED
REVENUE
REVENUE
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE
DESCRIPTION
1990- 1991
1991 - 1992
1991 - 1992
(5)
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
01 -3900
5230
Motor Vehicle in Lieu
3,998,948
3,931,000
3,831,000
01 -3900
5250
Homeowners Property Tat Ralief
45,06{
8,060
10,600
01- 3900
5330
Trailer Coach In Lieu - A52004
23,738
10,000
10,000
01 -3901
5338
Ott Highway License Fees
806
1,790
1,900
01 -3900
5390
Cigarette Tu
148,539
170,860
80,700
Total Intergovernmental
4217095
4021710
3,934,200
(6)
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
01 -3901
1186
Finger Print Fees
10,870
11,600
11,500
01 -3901
1200
D.A.R.E. Program Reimbursement
54,543
54,540
60,540
01 -3901
1201
Choices Program
10,730
5,370
0
01 -3901
1202
Juvenile Violence
980
1,000
0
01 -3901
2400
Candidates Filing Fees
5,267
0
0
01- 3901
3455
False Alarm Fee
11,225
1,000
14,150
01 -3901
7260
Plan Check Fees
356,694
532,130
270,000
01 -3901
7280
Planning Fees
92,002
117,960
180000
01 -3901
7290
Engineering Fees
961,037
1,384,800
952,000
Total Chef es for Services
1 503368
2108400
1 488190
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
GENERAL FUND
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
ACCOUNT
CODE
DESCHiPTION
ACTUAL
REVENUE
FISCALYEAR
1990 - 1991
BUDGETED
REVENUE
FISCALYEAR
1991 - 1992
REVISED
REVENUE
ESTIMATE
1991 -1992
(7)
OTHERS
01 - 3992
9001
Tralel9r h
0
12,400
12,400
01- 3999
8522
Non - Abated Reimbursements
53,082
75,000
50,000
01- 3999
8523
Special District Reimbursement
0
453,700
453,700
01- 3999
8524
• Reimbursement From RDA
5,888,338
4,948,870
4,948,870
01- 3999
$525
• Reimbursement From Fie Dist.
62,514
56,000
51,940
01 -3999
a630
Relmbursemert From Ottw Funds
21890,281
1,340,050
1,778,070
01- 8888
2000
Other Financing Sources
0
0
0
Total Others
8874195
8886020
7294980
•New account numbera to separately track awn hems e0ec8ve Osoal yea 1990 -91.
armwl.wl
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 27,095,638 27,142,850 26.133860
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
e... .03.wkI
M6
ACTUAL
BUD TED
REVISED
REVENUE
REVENUE
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE DESCRIPTION
1990 - 1991
1991 - 1992
1991 - 1992
Roadside Sobriety Checkpoint Prog. /Grant
04- 3901 5960 Roadside Sobriety Ckpt Grant Income
0
0
11,000
Total Sobriety Chpt Pr rant
0
11 000
RDA Reimbursement Program
05 -3901 2462 Activity Revenues
0
0
0
05- 3901 8524 Reimbursements From Redev. Agency
0
0
0
Total RDA Relmb. Program
0
Relmbursements/CCWD
06- 3901 5091 Relmbursements/CCWD
43,313
109,220
52,630
Total CCWD
43.a13
1 220
5
Reimbursements/Cal Trans
07 -3901 5891 Relmbursaments/Cal Tran
38,113
86,100
32,440
Total Cal Trans 1____78_,l13
244
e... .03.wkI
M6
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIK4ATED REVENUE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
.trt 3.wkI
ACTUAL
BUDGETEDRw
REVENUE
REVENUE
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE
DESCRIPTION
1990— 1991
1991 — 1992
1991 —1992
Reimbursement: San Bernardino County
08- 3901
5891
ReimbursemenVOtwntyol S.B.
13,636
84,320
73,840
Total Cwnty San Bernardino
mew
84,320
73,840
Gas Tax 2106, 2107, 2107.5
09- .3900
4600
Interest Earnings
151,512
43,500
63,000
09 -3900
5110
State Gas Tart — 2106
406,720
0
400,000
09 -3900
5130
State Gas Tait — 2107
907,530
901,960
810,000
09 -3900
5150
State Gas Tait — 2107.5
10,000
0
10,000
Total Gas Tm 2106, 1
4
1,383,000
GAS TAX 2105 — PROP 111
10 -3900
5140
Gas Tax 2105 - prop 111
318,830
139,000
360,000
10 -3901
4600
Interest Earnings
0
0
5,000
Total Tex 2105 — Pro 111
1
1 000
.trt 3.wkI
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
58325jrDA ART.8
12- 3900 4800 Interest Earnings
141,967
19,620
40,000
12 -3900 6170 TPA Art. s Revenues
817,657
10,000
322,500
12- 3901 8524 Reimbursement From RDA
0
0
1,032,140
12 -3999 0622 Non -Meted ReMnbmsements
47,125
0
2,500
Total A AR1. 8
4
Recre9t1011 SeMCea
13 -3901 7710 Recreation Fees
L599
639,590
875,490
Total Recreation Services
639,590
875 490
AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT
14 -3900 46W Interest EmNngs
0
0
0
14 -3900 5001 Air Quality knprav, Grant Revenue
0
25,000
25,000
Total r Quality Impfov. 6 rani
cmmv 3.W
%b
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
S8300
15- 3900 4600 Interest Eanings
1,578
0
0
15 -3900 5185 Section 2126 S 6 HAlbcation
0
0
0
16 -3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
Total S8 300
1578
il
Pedswian Grants /Arilcla 3
16 -3900 61W Pedeshlen/ekycie Sklemks
0
0
0
16- 3901 4600 Interest Earnings
0
0
0
Total Pedestrian Grant Article 3
0
0
0
etrcW ]
1\
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
Drainage FaCilitiearEliwanda
19 -3901 7465 Storm Drain Fees
(10,310
0
172,370
19- 3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
of Drain. aclltt s/Enwands
Park Development
20 -3901 4600 Interest Eanings
73,136
35,000
0
7730 Park Development Fees
267,702
250,000
132,560
7736 Cor9rit"lon hum RDA
0
2,000,000
1,696,160
20- 3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
0tal Park Development
340,838
2,285,000
1,830,720
Beautification
21 -3901 4600 Interest Earwgs
5,273
0
i,S00
21 -3901 7780 Beautification Fees
195,196
135,000
30,000
21 -3901 7761 In Uw Fees
105,627
0
0
21 -3901 7782 Contribution in aid
95,547
205,000
205,000
21 -3901 7796 41th Street Median Island
133,000
0
0
21- 3901 8520 *Other Revenue
as
0
0
21- 3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
Total Beautification I
SM.7281
340,MWI
5
anc�9J.wk1
1 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
nuev93.W
13
Systems Developmer
22 -3901
4600
Interest Earnings
50,946
4,400
20,000
4601
Uen hoome
104
0
6
5680
58140 Grant Income
314,947
0
0
7430
Systems Fees
878,297
0
200,000
7431
Transponaeon: Development Fee
0
567,800
400,000
7432
Tensp.: Emantervy Vehicle Fee
0
5,200
4,000
7440
Recoverable Systems Fees
9,971
0
0
7761
In Ueu Fees
255,000
0
0
7782
In Lieu Fees/Marlborough
0
0
0
7783
Contribution In Aid
0
170,000
170,000
22- 3901
8524
Reimbursement From RDA
155,419
0
115,000
22 -3992
9001
Transfers In
1,512
0
5,000
Total S stems Development
1,666,196
4
4
Drainege Facilidea/Generai City
23 -3901
4600
Interest Earnings
288
0
1,500
23 -3901
7480
Storm Drain Fees
210,859
123,000
10,000
23 -3901
7736
Cor*RxAlon from RDA
0
0
0
23- 3999
8530
Raimb. From Other Funds
75,000
0
0
23 -3992
WO
Transfers In
0
0
0
lotal Drainaas FRC/Genorig City
2M.147r
1
nuev93.W
13
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
Federal Aid Urban
24 -3900 6750 Fecorel Highway Grants
129,519
46,500
481,480
8524 Other Reimbursements
0
0
0
2a -5992 9001 Transfers In
19,247
0
0
Total Federal Ale Urban
7
4
4
R.Z'8erg Grant
26 - -3900 R.Z'Berg Grant
0
0
34,470
Total R.ZBera Grant
0
0
34,470
1988 Conservation Grant
27 -3900 1988 Conservation Grant Revenues
0
0
0
Total 1988 Conservation Grant
0
0
a1m 3.w]
.y
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1980 = 104,887 105,014
Grants - COBG
28- 3901 5880 CDBG Reimbursements
285,509
386,000
482,360
28- 3901 5881 Program hcome
0
0
0
Total Grants - CDBG
285.509
Park Bond Act - 1986
31- 3901 5885 Perk Bond Grant / 1966
810
0
50,000
Total an C -
Measure I - Transportation Revenue
32- 3900 5000 Measure C Local Street Alotment
803,236
532,000
560,000
32- 3900 6000 Measure I: Specific(Arterial) Projects
0
0
4,000,000
32 -3900 e624 RelmWsaemerp From RDA
0
0
226,000
Total Measure 1
803,236
532000
Special Districts' Aominietrailon
33 -3900 Assess. Dist. Transfers In
0
323,930
323,930
Total Special Dist. Aemfn.
323,93UI
323,930
.tcv 3.w I
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
TO I•AL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: .77 43287_= 8_862.140 11' 350
. tm03,Ml
4l6
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
REVISED
REVENUE
REVENUE
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCALYEAR
FISCAL YEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE DESCRIPTION
19%— 1991
1991 — 1982
1991 — 1992
Public Resources Grant
34- 3901 5880 Public Resources Grant Income
0
0
0
Total Public Resources Grant
0
0
0
SB 140 Grant
35- 3900 5880 SB 140 Grant Income
87,661
0
879,550
35- 3901 8524 Reimbursement Fran RDA
0
0
35.850
Total SB 140 Grant
87,661
0
916,700
Integrated Waste Mgmt
36 -3901 4554 integrated Waste Mgmt Fees
0
0
465,780
Total Integrated Waste Mgmt
0
0
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION! DEPT.
OF FORESTRY & FIRE PROTECT.TREE GRAN
124 -3900 4600 Interest Income
0
0
0
124- 3900 5880 BRA Tree Grant Income
0
0
0
total SBA Tree GvFt
TO I•AL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: .77 43287_= 8_862.140 11' 350
. tm03,Ml
4l6
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
ACCOUNT
CODE DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
REVENUE
FISCALYEAR
1990- 1991
BUUUETED
REVENUE
FISCAL YEAR
1991 - 1992
REVISED
REVENUE
ESTIMATE
1991 - 1592
Captlal Reserve
26-aaol 4800 Interest EerrkK4
423,729
125,000
144,000
8520 OMer Revenue
190,480
0
Total Ca Aal geserve Ca roFmo
14
1
144
..rt 3.WI
1-1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
AD 89 -1 MILLIKEN SO.OF ARROW(St d Drainage Ynprv)
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
63 -3901 7900 Bona proceed
0
0
3,661,460
W -3901 4x00 Interest Income
0
0
0
olal AD 99 -1 CaP Pro Fund:
AD 88 -2 Etiwenda/Righland CFO
76 -3901 4600 Interest Eenings
1,724
0
500
7900 Bond Proceeds
0
0
0
a620 Omer pi v mw
21,153
0
0
75- 3992 9001 Transfws In
0
0
0
Total a ro Fund
22.1577
ntrtv93..41
111
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
AD84 -2 Alto Loma Channel
80- 3901 4600 Interest Earnings
6,792
4,000
3,600
7900 Bond Proceeds
0
0
0
8520 Other Revenue
0
0
0
00 -3902 9001 Transfes In
0
0
0
Toted A D 84-2 Coo Proi Fund
4,000
AD 62 -1 61h Street Industrial
03 -3901 4600 Irderest Ewnlrw
45,618
30,000
23,000
83- 3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
Total a ro t Fund
45,618
.9m193,w I
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES; CENSUS 1990 = 104,807 105,014
AD 84 -1 Day Creek
86- 3901 4600 Interest Earnings
118,281
120,000
100,000
86 -"aW 9620 Other rCVerale
0
0
0
86- 3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
Total AD 84 -1 Cup Prof Fund
118,281
120,000
100,000
PD 85 Heritage
88- 3901 4600 Interest Earnings
22,109
10,000
12,000
88 -3901 7900 Bond Proceeds
0
0
0
88- 3992 9001 Transfers In
L==Total
0
0
0
P a6 Hertlaue Cap Pro
W 1
'I o
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE_
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
PO 85 Rod HIII
89- 3901 4600 Interest Earnings
13,2a5
14,000
2,000
e9 -3901 7900 Bond Proceed
0
0
0
a9- 3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
alai PD as Red HIII Cup Pro Fd
13,285
14,000
AD 86 -2 R(C Drainage District
95 -3901 4600 Interest Earnings
32,280
20,000
16,000
95 -3901 7900 Bond Proceeds
0
0
0
96 -3901 8620 08gr Rev je
0
0
0
95- 3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
0tal AD 86-2 Cap Prol Fund
800 MHZ
120 - 3901 4600 Interest Earnings
0
0
0
120 -3901 7900 Bond Proceeds
0
0
1,752,300
otal 800 MHZ Cap Prot Fun
a ue�lJ.rvk1
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS: 875.451 323,000 5.714.760
-L I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
AGENCYFUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 106,014
a1.03.Mi
Z. 2
ACTUAL
REVENUE
BUDGETED
REVENUE
REVISED
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCALYEAR
FISCAL YEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE DESCRIPTION
1990- 1991
1991 - 1992
1991- 1992
AD 89 -1 Milliken S. Of Arrow Street d Drainage Improv.
REDEMPTION FUND
84 -3901 1020 Property Tax: C/YSeaured
0
0
0
64 -3901 1040 Property Tax: P/Y Secured & Unsec.
0
0
0
64 -3901 1060 Property Tex: Penalties& Merest
0
0
0
64- 3901 4600 Interest Income
0
0
0
64- 3901 4601 Intedrest Income /Early Redemption
0
0
545,530
64 -3901 7900 Bond Proceeds
0
0
0
64 -3901 7905 Early Redempton
0
0
0
64- 3901 9001 Tmnsfws In
0
0
0
Total AD 89 -1 Redemption rmd/Aqemy Fund
AD 89 -1 Milliken S. Of Arrow Street 8 Drainage Improv.
RESERVE FUND
65-3901 4600 Interest Wome
0
0
0
65 -3901 7901 Reserve Requirements
0
0
478,070
66- 3901 9001 Trarofwi In
0
0
0
of Reserve FunaMenev F und
j ut
u
1 4
a1.03.Mi
Z. 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
AGENCYFUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES; CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
armr93Ml
.�3
CFO 88 -2 Flood District(Redemp.Fund)
76 -3901
1020
Property Tex - M SeCUled
220,880
470,340
430,840
76 -3901
1040
Property Tax - P/Y Secured
518
1,000
0
76 -3901
1060
Penalty 8 interest
0
30
0
76 -3901
46W
Interest Earr*W
0
18,810
8,620
76- 3901
4601
Interest - Early Redemption
0
0
0
76 -3901
7906
Prinoipal - Early Redemption
0
0
0
76- 3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
0
of Itl DisIlAgency I'd
221,408
490,180
1 4
CFO 88 -2 Law Enforcement 012trict
(Redemption Fund)
78 -3901
1020
Property Tar - GY Secured
5,000
11,130
8,960
1040
Property Tax - Pry Secured
0
0
150
1060
Penalty 6 Interest
0
0
40
4600
Interest Eemin0s
0
450
180
7901
Reserve Requkenlerts
0
0
0
78- 3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
9,330
Total CFO 88 -2 Law Enl A enc Ftl
5 000
11,5801
18,660
armr93Ml
.�3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
AGENCY FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
armWl3 l
14
AD 64 -2 RedemPDon
01 -3901
1020
Property Tax - C/Y Se ed
152,648
195,830
162,130
81 -3901
1040
Property Tax - Pry Sawred
14,187
4,963
10,190
81 -3901
1060
Penalty, d Interest
1,610
462
2,020
a,- 3M
4600
Interest Ewr*Vs
11,489
17,429
3,490
81- 3901
4601
Intereat - Early Redemption
0
0
0
91 -3901
7906
Prk¢Ipal - Emly, Redemption
0
0
0
81- 3901
8520
'Other Revenue
2,231
0
0
81 -399,2
9001
Tenders In
0
0
0
Total a em nc d
165
218,684
1 r7,836
AD 64 -2 Reserve
92- 3901
4600
Interest Ewr*Vs
22,413
0
10,000
7901
Reserve Requirements
0
0
0
82- 3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
0
Total eseme nc
22,4131
0
10,
armWl3 l
14
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
AGENCYFUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
otm91.M1
ZS
AD 84 -1 Redemption
87 -3901
1060
Penalty & Interest
1,337
2,000
2,440
07 -3901
1010
Property Tax- C/Y secured
1,111,292
1,191,360
1,084,390
87 -3901
1040
Property Tax - P/Y Secured
7,126
7,500
10,510
87 -3901
4600
Irtaest Earrangs
7,000
47,650
41,010
87- 3901
4601
Interest - Early Redemption
0
0
0
117-3001
7W
PrYrclpel - Early Redemption
0
0
0
87 -3901
7906
Contributed Capital - RDA
0
953,000
953,000
87 -3901
7907
Pro /Pay - Special Taxes
0
0
160,680
87- 3901
8521
Loan from RDA
0
0
0
87- 3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
0
Total W-34 A enc Fund
1. 126,155
2,201,510
2,252,03C
PD 85 Redemption
90 -3901
1020
Property Tax - C/Y Secued
1,019,235
1,632,280
1,562,180
1040
Property Tax - PN Secured
31,973
37,970
24,090
4600
Interest EemWVs
0
145,273
31,820
4601
Interest - Early Redemption
0
0
0
7906
Principal - Early Redemption
0
0
0
1060
Penalty & Interest
7,278
2,721
4,890
90- 3992
9001
Transfer, In
141,151
0
0
Total a em enc un
IA182441
otm91.M1
ZS
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
AGENCYFUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
PD 85 Reserve
91- 3901 4600 Interest Earnings
88,911
34,000
33,000
7901 Reserve Requirements
0
0
0
91- 3992 9001 Transfers In
141,151
0
0
Total PD e6 Resewe/Agency Reserve/Agency Fa
208062
34
AD 84 -1 Reserve
92- 3901 4600 Interest Earnings
0
0
0
92 -3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
Total eserve A n4
AD 62 -1 Redemptim
93 —wcn; 1020 Pf0PeftY Tax — C/Y Secured
741,021
782,330
719,180
1040 Property Tax — PfY Secured
19,260
50,040
3,250
4600 !Merest Earnkgs
93,009
89,827
14,460
4601 Interest — Early Redemption
122
0
0
7905 Principal — Early Redemption
3,144
0
0
8780 Sale of I and
0
0
0
93- 3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
93. -3901 1060 Penalty & Interest
10,468
1,187
1,650
Total — edem enc
q
t q
.MW3.w I
Ve
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
AGENCYFUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1980 = 104,887 106,014
AD 82 -1 Reserve
94- 3901 4600 Interest Earnings
79,788
50,000
42,000
7901 Reserve Req*ements
0
0
0
94- 3992 9001 Transient In
0
0
0
Total AD 82-1/Agency Dnd
4
AD 86 -2 Redemption
96 -3901 1020 Property Tax — CN Seared
198,440
215,150
168,020
1040 Property Tax — P/Y Secved
4,324
12,758
3,170
4600 Interest Earnings
22,222
19,148
3,480
4601 Interest — Early Redemption
354
0
ISO
7905 Principal — Early Redemption
8,134
0
3,980
1060 Penalty 6 lntaest
441
525
600
7902 Redemption Requirement
0
0
0
96- 3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
Total AD 86 —2fA9CncY FUnd
233,91SE
247,581
otnv 3.A]
2i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
AGENCVFUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
AD 86 -2 Rwom
97- 3901 4600 Interest Eanings
24,896
0
0
7901 Reserve ReQUkemerds
0
0
0
97- 3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
Total enc un
.a 3.W
TOTAL AGENCY FUNDS: 4.171,063 5,974,963 6,535,520
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL ASSESMENT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
.,rt. 3,MI
-49
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
VI
REVENUE
REVENUE
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE DESCRIPTION
1990 - 1991
1991 - 1992
1991 - 1992
Land Maim Dst f1 General
40 -3901 1020 Property TV - C(Y Secured
272,105
034,902
591,140
1040 Property Tax - P/Y Secured
5,928
9,100
7,000
4600 Interast Earnings
32,132
56,506
11,990
40 -3901 1060 Penalty B Interest
587
760
1,270
Total LAW #1
30.752
Lard M21r4 Olt s2 Vlclorla
41 -3901 1020 Property Tax -QY Secured
770,523
1,522,371
1,346,940
1040 Property Tex - Pry Secured
13,799
6,896
13,210
1060 Penalty B Interest
1,364
2,050
2,540
4600 Interest Earnlrgs
95,696
135,491
27,250
Total ;
4
.,rt. 3,MI
-49
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL ASSESMENT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
40
ACTUAL
VI
REVENUE
REVENUE
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FWAL YEAR
FISCALYEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE
DESCRIP, ION
1990- 1991
1991- 1992
1991 - 1982
Land MaIM Dst i3 Hyssop
42 -3901
1020
Property Tax - Cry Secured
71,036
3,035
1,900
1040
Property Tax - Pry Secured
2,097
100
3,760
1060
Penalty & Interest
0
20
650
4600
Interest Earnings
5,972
270
130
42- 3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
0
Total i
5
3,425
6.
Land Maint Dad 04 Tana Vista
43 -3901
1020
Property Tax - GY Secured
311,860
725,548
731,800
1040
Property Tax - PN Securetl
2,252
1,472
3,650
1060
Penalty & Interest
324
793
800
4600
Interest Earnings
54,318
64,573
14,720
43- 3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
0
Total M #4
368754
792,386
750.97
Land Makd Oat 96 Tot Lot
44 -3901
1020
Property Tax - GY Secured
4,567
4,200
4,240
1040
Property Tax - Pry Secured
53
200
0
1060
Family &Interest
0
20
0
4600
Interest Earnings
1,720
373
0
44- 3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
0
!total LMD #6
q
4,793
4,24
40
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECWL ASSESMENT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
elreYl3.W I
S�
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
REVISED
REVENUE
REVENUE
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCALYEAR
FISCAL YEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE
DESCRIPTION
1990 - 1991
1991 - 1992
1991 - 1992
Land Ma41t Dot t6 Ca Yn Cann
46 -39a
1020
Property Tax - C/Y Secured
213,897
275,511
258,240
1040
Property Tex - PfY Secured
5,760
2,0110
6,050
1060
Penalty & Interest
545
570
1,380
4600
Interest Earnings
43,274
24,520
5,310
45- 3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
0
Total LMD 06
263,476
302.601
270,980
Land Malnt Did t313 Medians
46 -3901
1020
Property Tax - Cry Secured
84,122
286,614
237.680
1040
Property Tax - RN Secured
0
11500
0
1060
Penalty & Interest
0
388
0
4600
Interest Ear"
3,494
25,667
4,750
46- 3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
Total I3
87,616
316,189
4 430
Land Maid Dot 07
47 -3901
1020
Property Tax - 07Y Secured
26,543
234,876
150,620
1040
Property Tex - Ply Secured
113
690
190
1060
Penalty &interest
0
51
40
4600
Interest Earnings
1.191
9,917
3,020
47-3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
0
Total LMtl #7
47
246,4341
elreYl3.W I
S�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL ASSESMENT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
raneW3M1
3 2
ACTUAL U
U V
VI
REVENUE R
REVENUE R
REVENUE
ACCOUNT F
FISCAL YEAR F
FISCAL YEAR E
ESTIMATE
CODE D
DESCRIPTION 1
1990 - 1991 1
1991 - 1992 1
1991 - 1992
Land Malnt Dat #8
48 -3901 1
1020 P
Property Ten - CN Secured 8
8,935 1
10,601 1
10,580
1040 P
Property Tax - PN Sewed 0
0 2
20 0
0
1060 P
Penalty &Interest 0
0 5
50 0
0
4600 I
Interest Earnings 3
357 9
943 2
210
48- 3992 9
9001 T
Transfers In 0
0 0
0 0
0
Total LMD #8 7
7,292 1
11,614 1
1 .
Llptding Dist 01 Arterial
55 -3901 1
1020 P
Property Tax - CN Secured 1
171,099 2
204,506 1
187,140
1040 P
Property Tax - Pry Secured 2
2,578 4
4,100 3
3,470
1060 P
Penalty & Interest 2
236 4
464 6
630
4800 I
Interest Earr*Vs 1
12,233 1
18,201 3
3,820
55- 3992 9
9001 T
Transfers In 0
0 0
0 0
0
Total LD 11 1
18b,l4b 2
227,271
Lighting Dist #2 Residential
56 -3901 1
1020 P
Property Tax - M Secured 9
95,967 1
111,300 1
101,260
1040 P
Property Tax - PN Secured 2
2,800 4
4,009 3
3,490
1060 P
Penalty& Interest 3
306 2
263 7
710
4600 I
Interest EmnIngs 1
14,883 9
9,506 2
2,110
56- 3992 9
9001 T
Transfers In 0
0 0
0 0
0
otal LD # 1
125,078
3 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL ASSESMENT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
33
ACTUALL
BUDGETED
REVENUE
REVENUE
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCALYEAR
FISCALYEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE
DESCRIPTION
1990- 1991
1991 -1992
1991 -1992
Lighting Dist •3 Victoria
67 -3901
1010
Property Tax - C/Y Secured
73,493
78,620
67,300
1040
Property Tax - P/y Secured
1,422
1,362
1,320
1060
Penalty & Interest
152
196
250
4600
Interest Earnings
8,513
6,997
1,380
57- 3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
0
Total f
58G
87,175
5
UgbOng Dist 04 Terra Vista
58 -3901
1020
Property Tex - ON Secured
65.464
69,620
69,520
1040
Property Tax - P/y Secured
429
456
690
1060
Penalty& Interest
63
167
150
4600
Interest EamWW
16,937
6,196
1,410
58- 3992
9001
Translers In
0
0
0
otal W 4
76439
1
Lighting Dist f5 Caryn Comm
69 -3901
1020
Property Tax - GN Secured
21,942
23,400
20,660
1040
Property Tex - PN Secured
822
100
790
1060
Penalty & Interest
97
60
190
4600
Interest Earnings
6,982
2,083
430
P9- 3992
9001
Transfers In
0
0
0
Total ILD #5
1 29,8431
4
33
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL ASSESMENT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
etre,9J.Wl
3 y
ACTUAL
REVENUE
5UDGETED
REVENUE
REVISED
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCAL YEAR
FISCALYEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE DESCRIPTION
1990 - 1991
1991 -1992
1991 -1992
Lighting War! t6 Industrial Area
60 -3901 1020 Property To - C/Y Seared
111930
17,268
14,060
1040 Property To - P/Y Seared
37
400
400
1060 Penalty& Interest
3
40
&D
46 Interest Earnings
00
1,522
1,537
290
60- 3992 9001 Transfers In
0
0
0
Total t
4
45
14,830
LighOng Dist a7
61 -3901 1020 Property To - CfY Secured
0
12,414
6,820
1040 Property To - Ply Secured
0
0
0
7000 Penalty & Interest
0
0
0
4600 Interest Earnings
0
1,105
140
61 -3092 soot Transfers In
0
0
0
Total l s7
5
etre,9J.Wl
3 y
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
SPECIAL ASSESMFNT FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
Wr 03,"l
TOTAL SPECALASSESSMENT FUNDS. 2.542.474 4.619.021 3.929720
3s
ACTUAL
SUDCETLO
REVISED
REVENUE
REVENUE
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCALYEAR
FISCAL YEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE DESCRIPTION
1990- 1991
1991 - 1892
1991 -1992
Lighting Dist !a
62 -3901 1020 Piopmty Tex - C/Y Seo ed
0
122
120
1040 Property Tex - PN Se red
0
0
0
1060 Penally& Interest
0
0
0
4600 Interest Earnings
0
11
10
62- 3992 9001 Travelers In
0
0
n
Total lD #8
ul
1331
1301
Wr 03,"l
TOTAL SPECALASSESSMENT FUNDS. 2.542.474 4.619.021 3.929720
3s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUE
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 105,014
c.t e i kl
TOTAL PROPRIETARY FUNDS: �— 985,929 = _652;800= 500000
GRAND TOTAL - ALL FUNDS 43 313.822 45.574.574 57.084 210
3b
A AL
auoGETro
REVISED
REVENUE
REVENUE
REVENUE
ACCOUNT
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
ESTIMATE
CODE
DESCRIPTION
1990- 1991
1991 - 1992
1991 - 1992
Intergovernmental Service
72- 3901
4600
Interest Earnings
145,071
20,000
10,000
72 -3901
8075
Sale Of Machinery 8 Equip,
33,161
0
0
72- 3901
8523
Assessment District Ralmbureemanl
0
250
0
72- 3901
9002
Users Fees
713,839
567,350
0
72- 3992
9001
Tranvbr ^In
0
0
0
otal IGS FunJ
71
587,600
10,000
Benefit Contingent
73 -3907
4600
iniorast Eammgs
93 ,858
65,000
40,000
73 -3992
9031
Transfers in
0
0
0
Total Benefit Contingent Fund
8
c.t e i kl
TOTAL PROPRIETARY FUNDS: �— 985,929 = _652;800= 500000
GRAND TOTAL - ALL FUNDS 43 313.822 45.574.574 57.084 210
3b
EXPENDITURE
SUMMARY
31
FUND O4
FUND 05
FUND 06
FUND 07
FUND 08
FUND 09
FUND 10
FUND 12
=UNO 13
=UND 14
FUND 16
=UND 19
=UND 20
=UND 21
=UND 22
FUND 25
FUND 26
FUND 27
FUND 28
FUND 31
FUND 32
FUND 33
=UND 34
°UND 35
=UND 36
=UND 40
=UND 41
FUND 44
FUND 45
FUND 46
FUND 47
FUND 48
FUND 54
FUND 55
FUND 56
FUND 57
FUND 58
UND 59
=UND 60
°UND 61
64
65
72
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
199DM
ACTUAL EXP 8
SUMMARY BY FUND
28,823,021
SOBRIETY CXPT GRANT I L
CNTY FLOOD CNTRL AGE
GAS TAX 2106, 2107 A 2107.5
PROPOSITION 111
TDA ARTICLE 8 FUNDS
COMM SRVCS- RECREATION
GRANTIART.3
NAGE I ETIWANDA
(DEVELOPMENT
fTIFICATION FUND
'EMS DEVELOPMENT
NAGS: GEN'L CITY
AID URBAN FUND
TAL RESERVE FUND
BERG GRANT FUND
CONSERVATION GRANT
I.G. FUND
BOND ACT 1986
WREI
PUBLIC RESOURCES GRANT
S5140
INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT
LAID X1 GENERAL
LMD X2 VICTORIA
LMD N3A HYSSOP
LMD #4 TERRAVISTA
LMD X5 TOT LOT
LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY
LMD M3B MEDIANS
LMD 47 NORTH ETIWANDA
LMD N8 SOUTH ETIWANDA
CITYWIDE STREETLIGHTS
SLD #1 ARTERIAL
SLD F2 RESIDENTIAL
SLD N3 VICTORIA
SL) M4 TERRA VISTA
SLD X5 CARYN COMMUNITY
SLD M6 INDUSTRIAI, AREA
SLD N7 NORTH ETIWANDA
SLD M8 SOUTH ETIWANDA
AD 89- I CPTL IMPRVMT
AD 89 -1 REDEMPTION
AD 89 -1 RESERVES
SERVICES
38
47
576,949
0
0
486,304
134,16(
495,891
653,441
259,195
231,106
0
686,273
33,491
16,909
8,938
0
0
51,218
0
0
749,121
28,020,120
0
0
109,220
86,100
84327
966,250
60,040
492,050
839,590
0
0
0
2,302,960
49,960
963,570
655,950
894,760
0
0
0
1,039,421
0
972,780
316,950
0
636,750
0
794,270
1,701,380
3,180
884,080
4,420
288,000
301,850
245,490
11,090
467,500
219,240
159,370
101,170
129,140
54,160
22,550
12,940
130
5,000
0
0
0
ESTIMATED
EXPENDITURES
27,948,600
11,000
0
52,630
32,440
73,940
913,150
58,220
341,610
649,950
16,110
0
86,970
2,364,970
208.680
1,140,420
850,180
330,010
0
34,470
0
442,250
50,000
855,260
299,490
0
281,240
464,790
573,090
1,696,580
3,180
670,140
4,530
453,680
265,650
132,360
4,990
460,000
217,820
152,610
117,610
74,480
38,890
9,880
4,510
20
3,603,330
0
0
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
199491 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL E)P 8 ADOPTED EWENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION ENCUM FYE
BUDGET
2
SUMMARY BY FUND
FUND 73
PERSONNEL OVERHEAD
159,478
0
0
FUND 75
AD 88- 2 ETWOA/HGHLND
28,576
60,000
506,600
FUND76
CFD88- 2FL000
1,850
470,340
50,000
FUND78
CFO 88 -2 LAW ENFOflC.
524
11,130
11,130
FUND 80
AD 84 -2 (MAINZ)
15,423
66,000
15,93D
FUND 81
AD 84- 2 REDEMPTION
185,323
195,830
195,830
FUND83
AD 82 -1 6TH ST
56,810
504,320
123,940
FUND 86
AO(MekRooe) 84 -1 DAY CREEK
2,050,381
0
0
FUND 97
AD 94- 1 REDEMPTION
1,009,000
2,140,040
2,218,430
FUND 88
PD -85 HERITAGE IMPR
32,435
0
290290
FUND 89
PD -85 RED HILL IMPR
76,765
0
105,420
FUND 90
PARK DST 85 REDEMPTION
1,056,943
1,591,040
1,607,940
FIND 91
PARK DST 85 RSRV FUND
141,151
0
0
FUND 93
AD 82-IM REDEMPTION
718,178
789,250
741,710
FUND 95
AD 86- 2 RA:ORAN4GE (M ANT)
39,739
316,700
x,870
FUND 96
AD 86 -2 REDEMPTION
201,739
211,590
210,590
FUND 120
800 MHZ RADIO
0
0
1,752,300
FUND 122
AD91- 28EDENNMON
0
0
7,100
FUND 124
SBA FORESTRY B FIRE TREE awj
0
0
0
GRAND TOTAL ALL
FUNDS
66 ,436,046
50,001,813
54,112,210
NOTE: ReWts an accounting only adlusenern b incorporate
(877,270)
(894,910)
Resource SeMcee' dlyWons inb the General Fund.
49.124.543
53.217,300
3q
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990191 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL E%P & ADOPTED ENPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM (M FYE BUDGET 06/30192
01 -4110
CITY COUNCIL
01 -4110 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
26,848
27,880
27,880
01 -4110 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
9,756
9,760
9,760
01- 4110 -2800
P.E.R.S.
100
200
200
01- 4110 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
13,873
15,700
8,600
01 -4110 -3300
MILEAGE
85
1,050
SOD
01- 4110 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
6,510
4,280
3,000
01 -4110 -3966
DUES
575
0
0
01- 4110 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
230
230
230
01- 4110 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
1,507
3,000
2,300
01 -4110 TOTAL',
59,484
62,100
52,470
01 -4122
CRY MANAGER
01 -.122 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
401 ,957
331.240
331,240
01 -4172 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
126,890
115,930
115,930
01- 4122 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
14,295
12,660
8,940
01- 4122 -3300
MILEAGE
6,792
6,500
6,500
01- 4122 -3900
MAINT &OPERATIONS
8,154
10,000
7,500
01- 4122 -3931
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
0
3,560
3,560
01 -4122 -1966
DUES
1,946
3,500
3,500
01 -4122 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
922
920
920
01 -4122 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
50,917
59,710
59,710
01- 4122 -7044
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
5,074
0
0
01 -4122 TOTAL:
616,947
544,020
537,800
01 -4123
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION
01- 4123 -3100
TRAVEL& MEETING
481
500
400
01- 4123 -3300
MILEAGE
0
300
100
01 -4123 -3900
MAINT, & OPERATIONS
209
S00
250
01 -4123 -3968
DUES
0
0
0
01 -4123 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
20
20
01- 4123 -6020
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
0
01 -4123 TOTAL'.
690
1,320
770
yo
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCALYEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED E)PENOITURES
CCOUNT NL1MRPR DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0FYE BUDGET 06 /30192
01 -4125
DISASTER PREPAREDNES
01 -4125 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
144,274
119,080
119,080
01 -4126 -1200
OVERTIME
777
0
0
01- 4125 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
51,600
41,680
41,68 0
01- 4125 -3100
MEETINGS & TRAVEL
14,931
3,060
3,060
01- 4125 -3300
MILEAGE
109
0
0
01- 4125 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
32,992
6,050
6,050
01- 4125 -3931
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
1806
7,340
7,340
01- 4125 -3956
DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS
349
240
160
01- 4126 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
1,051
1,050
1,050
01 -4125 -6020
HAZARD.WASTE REMOVAL
0
20,000
20,000
01- 4126 -602e
CONTRACT SERVICES
27,528
21,980
21,980
01- 4125 -7044
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
5,406
S00
800
01- 4125TOTAL:
297,903
221,280
221,200
01 -4126
CITY CLERK
01- 4126 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
130,695
140,110
136,380
01- 4126 -1200
OVERTIME
454
1,500
750
01 -4126 -1300
PART TIME PAYROLL
7,015
$,800
8,460
01- 4126 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
46,423
49,740
49,740
01 -*126 -3100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
2,365
2,700
2,130
01- 4126 -3300
MILEAGE
38
0
0
01 - 4126 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
46,779
56,500
40,030
01- 4126 -3956
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
465
480
480
01 -4126 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITIES
1,200
1,200
1,200
01 -4126 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
47,460
47,450
47,450
01 -4126 -7044
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
11,664
0
0
Ot -4126 TOTAL:
294,758
308,460
286,620
01 -4127
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
01- 4127 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
284,230
498,670
01 -4127 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
99,480
99,480
01- 4127 -3300
MILEAGE
0
0
0
01- 4127 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
01 -4127 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
8,740
4,370
01 -4127 TOTAL:
0
392,450
602,520
NOTE, Incroased salary cost in
1991 -92 reflects additional
city sell being reimbursed
for RDA o acts.
Li 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990191 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0 FYE BUDGET 06/30/92
01 -4150
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
01 -4150 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
142,437
175,360
175,360
01 - 4150-1200
OVERTIME
0
0
0
01 -4150 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
2,554
0
0
01- 4150 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
61,189
61,370
61,370
01- 4150 -3100
TRAVEL& MEETINGS
1,930
4,050
3,550
01- 4150 -3300
MILEAGE
2,682
4,500
1,800
01- 4160 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
1,016
2,100
2,100
01- 4150 -3956
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
538
770
770
01 -4160 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITIES
486
490
490
01 -4150 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
15,554
28,780
28,780
01 - 4160 -7044
CAPITAL EXP
0
0
0
01 -4150 TOTAL:
228,386
277.420
274,220
01 -4151
FINANCE
01- 4151 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
391,110
336,050
307,490
01 -4161 -1200
OVERTIME
4,419
0
0
01 -4151 -1300
PART -TIME PAYROLL
0
0
0
01 -4151 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
132,146
117,620
117,020
01- 4151 -31 DO
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
4,200
3,100
3,100
01 -4151 -3300
MILEAGE
3,025
3,500
3,500
01 -4161 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
16,834
25,500
23,000
01- 4151 -3956
DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS
627
1,100
1,000
01 - 4151 -3960
GENERALLIABILITY
1,410
1,410
1,410
01- 4151 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
125,362
115,100
115,100
01 -4161 -7044
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
643
0
0
01 -4151 TOTAL:
679,776
603,380
572,220
01 -4162
BUSINESS LICENSING
01 -4162 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
91,642
106,710
106,710
01- 4152 -1200
OVERTIME PAYROLL
19
0
0
01 -4162 -1300
PARTTIME PAYROLL
0
0
0
01- 4152 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
35,754
37,350
37,360
01 -4152 -3100
TRAVEL 8- MEETINGS
1,110
1,300
200
01- 4152 -3300
MILEAGE
13
2,000
50
01 -4152 -3900
MAINT &OPERATIONS
7,995
9,700
9,700
01 - 4162 -3956
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
0
70
70
01- 4152 -3960
GENERALLMILITY
519
520
520
01 -4162 -6025
CONTRACT SERVICES
32,011
19,590
19,590
01- 4152 -7044
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
19,526
0
0
01 -4152 TOTAL.
188,789
177.240
174,190
L) 'L
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990191 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0FYE BUDGET 06130!92
01 -4153
PURCHASING
01- 4153 -1100
REGl.AAR SALARIES
109,449
122,800
122,800
01 -4153 -1200
OVERTIME
267
0
0
01 -4153 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
40,796
42,980
42980
01- 4153 -3100
TRAVEL& MEETINGS
1,572
2,100
1,550
01- 4163 -3300
MILEAGE
32
1,000
200
07- 4153 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
4177
10,760
3,000
01- 4153 -3956
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
145
240
240
01- 4153 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
455
460
460
01- 4153 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
23,292
37,340
37,340
01- 4153 -7044
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
15,091
0
0
01 -4153 TOTAL
196,276
217,680
208,570
01 -4154
RISK MANAGEMENT
01- 4154 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
24,413
37,090
37,090
01 -4164 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
12,348
12980
12,980
01- 4154 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
997
1,800
1,500
01 -4154 -3300
MILEAGE
0
0
0
01- 4154 -3900
MAINT A OPERATIONS
7,676
7,100
5,000
01 -4164 -3901
TRAINING & EDUCATION
0
0
0
01 -4154 -3956
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
450
620
620
01- 4154 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
459
460
460
01- 4154 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
21,940
28,180
28,180
01- 4164 -7044
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
0
0
0
01 -4154 TOTAL:
68,283
88,230
85,830
01 -4155
TREASURY MANAGEMENT
01 -4155 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
36,227
630
630
01- 4155 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
10,095
220
220
01- 4155 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
292
1,200
1,200
01 -4155 -3900
MAINT. & OPER.
0
600
250
01 -4155 -3956
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
0
100
100
01 -4166 -3%0
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
110
110
01- 4155 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
785
0
0
01 -4165 TOTAL:
47,399
2,760
$510
L} .3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXPB ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0 FYE BUDGET 0630
01 -4156
PERSONNEL
01- 4156 -1100
REGULAR SALARY
124,330
120,050
120,050
01 -4156 -1200
OVERTIME
136
0
0
01- 4156 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
$407
0
0
01- 4156 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
44,714
42,020
42,020
01- 4156 -1901
NEW POS CONTINGENCY
5,986
5,000
3,000
01- 4156 -3100
TRAVEL B MEETINGS
1,534
2,850
2,000
Di- 4156 -3300
MILEAGE
334
500
1,200
01- 4156 -3900
MAINT &OPERATIONS
10,739
20.200
20,000
01 -4156 -3956
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
613
1,380
1,000
01- 4156 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
600
600
600
01- 4156 -6026
CONTRACT SERVICES
27,133
23,050
23,000
01- 4156 -7044
CAPITAL EQUIP
512
0
0
01 -4156 TOTAL:
219,038
215.650
212,870
01 -4157
FIRE DISTRICT
01- 4157 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
41,480
37,140
01 -4157 -1200
OVERTIME
0
0
280
01- 4157 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
14,520
14,520
01 -4157 TOTAL:
0
56,000
51,940
01 -4159
RES. SRVCS - ADMINISTRATION
01 -4159 -1100
REGULAR PAYROLL
127,073
144,550
144,550
01- 4159 -1200
OVERTIME
1,904
0
0
01- 4159 -1900
FRINGE BENEFIT
47,628
50,590
50,590
01- 4159 -3100
TRAVEL MEETINGS
1,319
500
SOD
01- 4159 -3300
MILEAGE
0
560
560
01 -4159 -3900
MAINT& OPERATIONS
33,385
4,850
4,850
01- 4159 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
287
300
300
01 -"159 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
4,451
23,940
23,940
01 -4159 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
21,321
0
0
01 -4159 TOTAL:
237,366
225,290
225,280
Lt 4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED EXPENDINRES
M C VI
ACCOUNT NURFR OFCRIPTN
01 -4160
RES. SRVCS - GEO INFO SYSTEM
01- 4160 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
97,365
86,400
86,400
01- 4160 -1270
OVERTIME
1,679
0
0
01 - 4160 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
57,870
30,240
30,240
01 -4160 -3100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
401
800
800
01- 4160 -3300
MILEAGE
662
500
560
01- 4160 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
4322
13,600
13,600
01- 4160 -3956
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
173
450
450
01- 4160 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
377
400
400
01 -4160 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
10,782
22,050
22,050
01 -4160 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
0
0
0
M -4160 TOTAL:
171,631
154,500
154,500
01-4161
RES. SRVC5 - MGMT INFO SYSTEM
01- 4161 - 1 i00
REGULAR SALARIES
303,291
316,500
334,140
01 -4161 -1200
OVERTIME
522
0
0
01 - 4161 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
109.221
110,780
110,780
01- 4161 -3100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
1,432
1,550
4,000
01- 4161 -3300
MILEAGE
1,498
560
580
01- 4161 -3900
MAINT &OPERATIONS
13,875
20,280
17,830
01 - 4161 -39&6
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
244
670
670
01- 4161 -3%0
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
700
700
01 -41M -6026
CONTRACT SERVICES
92,612
46,440
46,440
01 -4161 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
10,732
0
0
01 -4161 TOTAL:
533,434
497,480
515.120
01 -4182
AN KOL CONTROL SERVICES
01- 4162 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
0
01- 4162 -1270
OVERTIME
0
0
0
01- 4162 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
01- 4162.3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
0
0
0
01- 4182 -3300
MILEAGE
0
0
0
01- 4162 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
0
0
0
01 -4162 -3931
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
0
0
0
01- 4162 -3956
DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS
0
0
0
01- 4162 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
01- 4162 -6028
CONTRACTSERVICES
0
194,390
194,390
01 -4162 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
0
0
0
01--4162 TOTAL:
0
194,390
194,380
wS
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM FYE BUDGET 0630
01 -4245
CITY FACILITIES
01- 4245 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
87,070
122,700
122,700
01 -4245 -1200
OVERTIME SALARIES
979
5,000
3,000
01- 4245 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
0
0
0
01 -4245 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
38,974
42,950
42,950
01 -4245 -3300
MILEAGE
13
0
0
01- 4245 -3900
MAINTENANCE d OPERATIONS
493,571
794,380
790,000
01- 4245 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT. d OPERATIONS
0
2,800
2,800
01 -4245 -3956
DUES
0
0
0
01 -4245 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
11,414
13,910
13,910
01- 4245 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
228,468
370,460
370,460
01- 4245 -7043
CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDINGS
0
0
0
01- 4245 -7044
CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT
4,275
3,500
3,000
01- 4245 -7045
CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES
14,436
0
0
01 -4245 TOTAL:
879,200
1,355,700
1,348,820
01 -4265
PERSONNEL OVERHEAD
01- 4265 -1901
RESERVE CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
01- 4265 -2100
COFFEE CONTRIBUTION
1,200
1,200
1,200
01 -4265 -2200
DEFERRED COMPENSATN
0
0
0
01- 4265 -2300
TUITION REIMBURSEMNT
29,863
10,000
25,000
01 -4265 -2400
EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
23,595
2,000
10,000
01 -4265 -2800
P.E.R.S. CONTRIBUTNS
0
0
0
01- 4265 -3962
UNEMPLOYMENT INSUR
0
0
0
01- 4265 -3963
WORKERS COMPINSUR
0
0
0
01- 4265 -3965
MEDICAL INSURANCE
0
0
0
01- 4265 -3966
LTDA.IFE INSURANCE
0
0
0
01 -4265 -3967
DENTAL INSURANCE
0
0
0
01 -4265 -3969
OPTICAL INSURANCE
0
0
0
01- 4265 -3970
MEDICARE CONTRIBUTNS
0
0
0
01 -4265 -3971
DISABILITY ADVANCES
a
0
0
01 -4265 -3975
SAFETY FOOTWEAR
0
0
0
01 -4265 TOTAL:
1;4,658
13,200
36,200
4 IO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0 FYE BUDGET 06/30192
01 -4285
GENERAL OVERHEAD
01 -4285 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETING
15,025
13,930
13.930
01- 4266 -3900
MAINT. & OPERATIONS
0
6,000
5,000
01- 4285 -3955
ELECTRONIC DATA INSR
0
10,000
10,000
01- 4285 -3956
DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS
28.229
30,130
37,500
01- 4285 -3958
AUTOMOBILE INSUR
30,924
113000
56,500
01- 4285 -3959
FIRE INSURANCE
29,790
35,000
45,000
01 -4286 -3961
GENERAL LIABILITY
392,935
100,000
450,000
01 -4285 -3973
BOOKING FEESlS82557
123,265
284,710
306,700
01- 4286 -3974
PROP.TAXADMIN /SB2657
37,050
38,900
40,660
01- 4285 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
1,234.479
1,325,650
1,324,610
O1 -4286 -7044
C /OEOUIPMENT
0
0
0
01 -4285 TOTAL:
1,891,697
1,957,220
2,289,900
01 -4313
COMMUNITY DEVADMIN
X01- 4313 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
294,174
128.770
128,770
01- 4313 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
42,560
45,070
45,070
01 -4313 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
6.844
4,060
4,060
01- 4313 -3300
MILEAGE
5,377
3,000
3,000
01- 4313 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
2,685
5,950
5,700
01- 4313 -3956
DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS
379
900
900
01_413 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
671
670
670
01- 4313 -6328
CONTRACT SERVICES
7,764
9,150
9,150
01 - 1313 -7oa
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
61000
0
0
o1 -4313 TOTAL:
366,454
197,570
197,320
01 -4333
PLANNING
01- 4333 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
1,239,719
1,243,450
1,199,840
01- 4333 -1200
OVERTIME
0
0
P
01- 4333 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
12,547
0
0
01 -4333 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
474,299
435,210
435,210
01- 4333 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
11,530
10,230
8,920
01 -4333 -3.900
MILEAGE
3,047
3,000
3,000
01- 4333 -3900
MAINT& OPERATIONS
47,344
33,900
29,600
01- 4333 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT &OPER
21,875
11,850
11,650
01 -4333 -3966
DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS
1,508
1,590
1,540
01 -43;J -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
6,500
6,500
6,500
01 -4333 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
419,718
241,040
263,680
01 -4333 -7044
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
14,958
0
0
01 -4339 -7046
VEHICLES
0
0
0
01 -4333 TOTAL:
2,253,045
1,986,770
1 1,960.140
III
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM GA FYE BUDGET Ob3D /92
01 -4451
POLICE DEPT
01- 4461 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
27,453
22.870
22870
01- 4451 -1200
OVERTIME
898
0
11000
01- 4451 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
72952
109,770
109,770
01 -4451 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
15,132
16,780
16,780
01- 4461 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
1,001
1,250
5,000
0 -4451 -3110
TRAVEL& MEETINGS\ D A. R.E.
0
1,000
6,600
01- 4451 -3455
FALSE ALARM FEE
320
0
0
01- 4451 -3900
MAINT& OPERATIONS
56,257
70,620
63,910
01 -4451 -3910
MAINT &OPS\ D.A.R.E. PROGRAM
0
12030
23,900
01- 4451 -3931
VEHICLE & EQUIP MAINT
225,773
269,790
264,860
01- 4451 -3935
VEHICLE& EQUIP MAINT\DA R.E.
0
3,000
3,000
01 -4451 -3958
DUES& SUBSCRIPTIONS
4,724
5,060
5,060
01- 4451 -4536
ASSET SEISURE
525
0
0
01- 4451 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
6,673,707
6,90,900
6,935,930
01- 4451 -6030
CONTRACT SERVICES I D.A.R.E,
0
69,820
69,820
01- 4451 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
7,127
0
4,760
01- 4451 -7045
CAPITAL EXP- VEHICLES
13,791
0
0
01 -4461 TOTAL:
7,099,660
7,528,860
7,533,160
01 -4532
COMMUNITY SERVICES
01 -4632 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
559,995
608,160
574,130
01- 4532 -1200
OVERTIME
853
0
0
01- 4532 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
148,944
137,980
137,980
01- 4532 -1300
REG PART -TIME SAL
0
11,510
11,510
01- 4532 -1900
FRINGE BEN - REG SAL
214,501
212,860
212,860
01- 4532 -1900
FRINGE BEN - P/f SAL
2,193
14,260
14,260
01- 4532 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
16,088
4,450
4,450
01 -4532 -3300
MILEAGE
6,336
4,200
4,200
01- 4532 -3900
MAINT& OPERATIONS
206,732
225,180
189,900
01 -4532 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT &OPER
14,103
7,430
7,430
01- 4532 -3956
DUES& SUBSCRIPTIONS
1,838
1,300
1,300
01- 4532 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
3,434
3,440
3,440
01- 4532 -6026
CONTRACT SERVICES
117,392
117.830
114.290
01- 4532 -7043
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
0
0
0
01- 4532 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
7,102
0
0
01 - 4532 -7046
CAPITAL EXP - VEHICLES
14,255
0
0
01 -4532 TOTAL:
1,313,766
1,348,600
1,275,750
AO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED EXPENDITUPES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPi ION ENCUM Q FYE BUDGET 06 /3052
01 -4353
PLANNING COMMISSION
01- 4353 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
5,569
6,000
6,030
01 - 4363 -3100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
10,320
9,950
10,570
01- 4353 -3900
MAINT &OPERATIONS
201
500
0
01- 4353 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
120
120
0
01 -4353 TOTAL:
16,210
16,570
16,600
01 -4354
HISTORICAL PRIES COMM
01- 4354 -3100
TRAVEL& MEETINGS
3,131
4,150
4,160
01- 4354 -3900
MAINT &OPERATIONS
546
500
500
01 -4364 -3956
DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS
110
330
330
01- 4354 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
50
50
01 -4354 TOTAL:
3,789
5,030
5,030
01- -4355
ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT. COM,
01- 435.5 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETING
179
500
250
01- 4355 -3300
MILEAGE
0
0
0
01- 4366 -3900
MAINT. & OPERATIONS
783
21X10
1,000
01- 4355 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
30
30
01 -4355 TOTAL:
962
2,530
1,280
01 -4373
BUILDING& SAFETY
01- 4373 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
1,190,914
1,219,860
1,118,130
01- 4373 -1200
OVERTIME
185
0
0
01 - 4373 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
8,464
0
0
01- 4373 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
528,234
426,950
426,950
01- 4373 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
5,972
3,000
3,000
01- 4373 -3300
MILEAGE
3,308
3,000
3,000
01- 4373 -3900
MA INT& OPERATIONS
26,554
21,000
21,000
01- 4373 -3931
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
74.278
43,750
43,750
01- 4373 -3956
DUES & SUBSCRIPTION
410
640
600
01- 4373 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
5,300
5,300
5,300
01- 4373 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
183,712
166,660
120,510
01- 4373-704{
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
16,634
0
0
01- 4373 -7045
CAPITAL VEHICLES
28,719
0
0
01 -4373 TOTAL:
2,072,684
1,890,160
1,742,240
41
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990191 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMRER DESCRIPTION ENCUM0 FYE BUDGET 06 /30/92
01 -4540
PARK(REC. COMMISSION
01- 4540 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
1,236
750
750
01 - 4840 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
750
680
680
01- 4540 -3956
DUES SUBSCRIPTIONS
450
450
450
01- 4540 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
37
40
40
01 -4640 TOTAL:
2.473
1.920
1,920
01 -4637
ENGINEERING AOMIN
01- 4637 -11130
REGULAR SALARIES
399,483
300.020
312,000
01 -4637 -1200
OVERTIME
1,759
0
120
01- 4837 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
87,779
105,010
105,010
01- 4637 -3100
TRAVEL& MEET INGS
2,479
6,180
3,700
01 - 4637 -2100
MILEAGE
1,615
3,000
3,000
01- 4637 -3900
MAINT& OPERATIONS
12,339
21,330
12,000
01 -"37-3931
VEHICLE MAINT & OPER
24
7,920
7,920
01- 4637 -3956
DUES& SUBSCRIPTIONS
166
970
850
01- 4637 -3960
GENERALLIABLITY
1,309
1,400
1,400
01 -4637 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
86 ,621
94,090
90,000
01- 4637 -7044
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
3,000
0
0
01 -4637 TOTAL:
596,584
539,920
536,000
01 -4638
ENG- DEVELOPMENT MGMT
01 -4638 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
655,344
522,760
53,700
01- 4638 - -1200
OVERTIME
0
0
0
01- 4636 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
224,688
182,970
182,970
01- 4638 -3100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
1,180
1,120
720
OI- 4630 -3300
MILEAGE
22
0
0
01 -4638 -3900
MAINT &OPERATIONS
2,925
6,980
5,480
01- 4638 -3956
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
0
170
160
01- 4638 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
5,139
1,600
1,600
01- 4638 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
509,128
139,860
130,910
01 - 4638 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
0
0
0
01- 4638 -7045
CAPITAL EXP - VEHICLES
0
0
0
01- 4638 -8636
VICTORIA LANE
2,400
0
1,650
01 -4638 TOTAL.
1,400,825
855,460
853,590
So
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENCITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM na FVF BUDGET 06130W
01 -4639
ENG - TRAFFIC MGMT
01- 4639 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
225,699
198,390
198,390
01 -4639 -1200
OVERTIME
0
0
0
01 -4639 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
86,552
69,440
69,440
01- 4639 -3100
TRAVEL& MEETINGS
552
850
550
01- 4639 -3300
MILEAGE
0
0
0
01- 4639 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
1,981
1,250
1,200
01 - 4639 -3931
VEHILE MAINT& OPER
0
2,710
2,710
01 -4639 -3932
EQUIPMENT MAINT
0
500
200
0 •.4639 -3966
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
195
370
370
01- 4639 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
657
410
410
01- 4639 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
55,454
34,290
34,290
01- 4639 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
17,906
0
0
01- 4639 -7045
CAPITAL EXP - VEHICLES
0
0
0
01 -4639 TOTAL.
389,996
308,210
307,560
01 -4640
ENG - PROJECT MGMT
01- 4640 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
58,112
68,090
65,000
01 -4640 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
2,445
23,830
22,750
01- 4640 -3100
TRAVEL &MEETINGS
1,159
650
400
01 -4640 -3300
MILEAGE
0
0
0
01- 4640 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
3.151
4,000
3,000
01 -4640 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT &OPER
0
0
0
01- 4640 -9966
DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS
540
670
290
01- 4640 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
556
460
460
M -4640 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
50,466
40,370
40,370
01- 4640 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
0
0
0
01 -4640 TOTAL,
116,429
138,070
132,270
01 -4641
ENO- CONSTRUCTN MGMT
01- 4f41 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
309 ,312
364,070
383,500
01 -4641 -1200
OVERTIME
1,021
0
200
01- 4641 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
105,288
127,420
127,420
01 -4641 -3100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
534
730
530
01 -4641 -3900
MAINT &OPERATIONS
4,674
4,000
2000 .
01 -4641 -3931
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
84,204
32,420
32,420
01 -4641 -3966
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
360
750
360
01 -4641 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
1,389
1,350
1,350
01 -4641 -6026
CONTRACT SERVICES
25,279
23,780
26,170
01- 4641 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
0
0
0
Ot -4641 -7046
CAPITAL EXP - VEHICLES
0
0
0
01 -4641 TOTAL
532,061
554,520
573,950
51
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 - -92 BUDGET
1990191 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM nu FYE BUDGET 06/30/92
01 -4646
COMMUNITY OEV.-
MAINT.VEHICLES & EQUIP.
01-4646 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
143,146
155,040
155,040
01- 4646 -1200
OVERTIME
3,142
0
250
01- 4646 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
99 ,334
54,260
54,260
01- 4646 -3900
MAINT. & OPERATIONS
94,705
111,500
56,000
01 -4646 -3930
FUEL
68,706
280,000
205,000
01- 4646 -3931
VEHICLE/EQUIP MAINT.
158,315
6,140
158,000
01 -4646 -3942
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
157,339
0
0
01- 4646 -3960
GENERALLIABB.RY
4,472
4,180
4,180
01- 4646 -6027
HAZARDOUS WASTE RMVL
7,434
20,000
25,000
01 -4646 -7043
CAPITAL EXP - FACIUTIES
0
0
0
01- 4646 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
0
0
0
01- 4646 -7045
CAPITAL EXP - VEHICLES
12,526
0
0
01-4646 TOTAL:
749,121
631,120
657,730
01 -4647
COMMUNITYDEV. -
MAINT PUBLIC WORKS
01 - 4647 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
1,843,843
1,334,280
1,234,500
01 -4647 -1200
OVERTIME
45,462
40,000
40,000
01 - 4647 -1300
PART -T94E SALARIES
13,948
11,490
11,490
01- 4647 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
581 ,648
467,920
467,920
W - 4647 -3100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
8,846
5,800
5,800
01- 4647 -3300
MILEAGE
2.227
0
2,400
01- 4647 -3900
MAINT &OPERATIONS
661,150
680,000
615,300
01- 4647 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT &OPER
502 ,631
348,740
310,200
01 -4647 -3932
EQUIPMENT MAINT
18,275
17,660
31,500
0. -4647 -3933
EMERG ®VEH RNTL
9,114
15,000
8,000
01 -4647 -3956
DUES& SUBSCRIPTIONS
1,561
1,550
1,550
01- 4647 -3960
GENERAL LIASILTY
24,120
22,160
22,160
01- 4647 -6027
HAZARDOUS WASTE RMOL
7,795
10,000
10,000
01-4647 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
832,695
734,810
701,700
01 -4647 -7043
CAPITAL EXP- FACILITY
66,262
0
0
01 -4647 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
40,595
0
0
01- 4647 -7045
CAPITAL EXP - VEHICLES
326,736
102,990
130,490
01- 4647 -8021
WATER UTILITIES
109,742
152,020
79,500
01 - 4647 -0022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
126,835
119,000
48,000
01 -4647 TOTAL',
5,223,485
4,063,420
3,720,510
Sz.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990191 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0 FVE BUDGET 08130/92
01 -4650
INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT
01 -4650 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
0
01- 4650 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
01- 4650 -3100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
0
0
0
01- 4650 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
0
0
0
01- 4650 -3960
GENERALLIABILTV
0
0
0
01- 4650 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
0
0
01- 4650 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
0
01 -4650 TOTAL:
0
0
0
01 -4991
TRANSFERS
01- 4991 - -Q900
TRANSFERSIN
0
(81,900)
(81,900
01- 4991 -9000
TRANSFER OUT
20 ,759
467,500
467,500
01 -4991 TOTAL:
20,759
385,600
385,600
,3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRPTION ENCUM FYE BUDGET
SUMMARY BY FUND, BY COST
CENTER,
BY ACCOUNT
04 -4451
ROADSIDE SOBRIETY CWT GRANT
04- 4451 -3900
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
0
0
0
04- 4451 -7044
CAPITAL EXP- EOUIPMNT
0
0
11,000
04 -4451 TOTAL:
0
0
11,000
05 -4313
RDA REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM
05- 4313 -1100
REGULAR SALARES
0
0
0
06- 4313 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
05- 4313 -3900
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
0
0
0
OS- 4313 -3960
GENFRAL I (ABILITY
0
0
0
05- 4313 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
0
05- 4313 -8020
GAS UTILITIES
0
0
0
05- 4313 -6021
WATER UTILITIES
0
0
0
05- 4313 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
0
0
0
05 -4313 TOTAL:
0
0
0
06 -4637
CCWD REIMBURSEMENT,
06 -4637 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
45 ,218
00,900
24,310
06- 4637 -1200
OVERTIME
2,157
0
0
06- 4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
27,888
28,320
28,320
06- 4637 -3900
VINT. & OPERATIONS
0
0
0
06 -4637 -3931
VEHICLE MA1NT.
0
0
0
06 -4637 TOTAL:
75,263
109,220
52,630
07 -4647
CALTRANS REIMS, /MNT
07- 4647 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
5,366
63,780
10,120
07- 4607 -1200
OVERTIME SALARIES
0
0
0
07- 4647 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
0
0
0
07- 4647 -1900
R INGE BENEFITS
73,612
22,320
22,320
0� - 4647 -3900
MJNT. & OPERATIONS
8,070
0
0
(.,..4647 -3931
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
0
0
0
07 -4 =,7 -3932
EOU'P MAINT. /OPER
0
0
0
07 -4647 TCTAL
34.048
86,100
32,440
L.-
5-9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990191 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL 0P3 ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM Q FYE BUDGET 06
08 -4647
S.B.CN Y REIMB/MNT.
08- 4647 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
4,310
3,200
2.930
08- 4647 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
696
1,120
1,120
08- 4647 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT S OPER
0
0
0
08- 4647 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
41,856
80,000
05,790
08- 4647TOTAL:
47,063
84,320
73,840
09 -4637
GAS TAX 2106, 2107 8 2107.5
09- 4637 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
243,036
458,140
322,000
09- 4637 -1200
OVERTIME
8,825
0
7,700
09- 4637 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
0
0
0
09- 4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
119.925
160:3,50
160,350
09- 4637 -3900
MAINTENANCE 8 OPERATIONS
2,437
0
0
09- 4637 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT80PER
13.617
0
39,040
09- 4637 -3960
GENERAL UABILITY
0
0
0
09- 4637 -5900
ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
0
0
09- 4637 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
247,015
20B,300
211,740
09- 4637 -7044
CAPITAL EXP-- EWIPMNT
15,652
0
0
09- 4637 -7045
CAPITAL EXP- VEHICLE
6U,9B4
52,460
50,000
09- 4637 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
206,917
87,000
145,000
09- 4637 -8703
ST fEHAB/ETIWANDA
0
0
0
09- 4637 -8779
CRY -WIDE INVENTORY
0
0
0
09- 4637 -8780
TRANS STUDIES d FAC i
7,312
0
7,32D
09- 4637 -8813
HILLSIDE IMP - HERMOSA
1,805
0
0
09- 4637 -9002
CITY -WIDE ST. REHAB.
0
0
0
09 -4637 TOTAL:
927,525
966,250
943,150
10 -4637
PROPOSITION 111
10- 4637 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
43,830
43,830
10- 4637 -1300
PART -TIME SALARES
0
810
0
10- 4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
15,400
14,390
10- 4637 -9110
PAVEMENT MGMT PROGRAM
0
0
0
10- 4637 -9201
19TH ST BRIDGE ®CUC.CRK.
0
0
0
10 -4637 TOTAL:
0
60,040
58,220
.ss
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM0 FYE BUDGFT D V/92
12 -4637
TDA ART!CLE8
12- 4637 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
81,769
86,480
20,000
12- 4637 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
0
3,980
0
12- 4637 -19 00
FRINGE BENEFITS
36,550
30,590
28,430
12- 4637 -8180
VNYRD(BSLN /HAVEN)
32,012
0
32020
12- 4637 -6606
AMETHYST ST RECON
44,112
0
0
12 -4637 -8705
FOOTHILL ® ROCHESTER
461.895
20,000
2,560
12 -4637 -8713
ARCHIBALD SIG COORD
16,000
0
5,920
12- 4637 -8774
SIG.TURNER/FOOTHILL
5,400
0
0
12 -4637 -8812
AVENIDA VEJAR
(360
0
0
12- 4637 -8821
TRANSPORTATION STUDY
15,791
20,000
800
12- 4637 -8825
SIG.DSGN:3INTRSECTIONS
67
0
70
12- 4637 -8826
SIG.8ASEUNE /RAMONA
8,035
0
1,950
12- 4637 -8827
SIG.BASEUNE &VAL
$035
0
1,950
12 -4637 -8828
SIG, 19TH & HERMOSA
67
0
70
12- 4637 -8829
SIG.ARROW /ARCHIBALD
32,408
0
0
12- 4637 -8830
SIG.DSGN:3INTRSECTIONS
I 67
0
70
12- 4637 -8831
SIG ARROW A HAVEN
115,463
^
0
12 -4637 -8832
SIG.HAVENNICTORIA
8,275
0
1,950
12- 4637 -8333
SIG.FOOTHILL &RAMONA
4,900
0
0
12 -4637 -8636
SIGNAL COORDINATION
16,000
0
8,300
12- 4637 -8904
VICTORIA IMP E/OEAST
14,791
0
0
12 -4637 -8905
AMETHYST(191N -O HGHLND)
159,908
1,000
0
12- 4637 -8907
ARCHBLD(S -O BANY /HLSD
4,495
0
3,500
12- 4637 -8909
BANYA.N(ESTWDMELLMAN)
456
0
80
12 -4637 -8910
HGHI ND(HERMOSA/MAY3RY)
96,203
0
0
12 -4637 -8913
SIG,ARCHIBALD &S,B,
4,900
0
1,260
12- 4637 -8914
SIG.ARCHIBALD &8TH
980
0
490
12 -4837 -8916
UPGRD SIG:ARRWNNYRD
1,040
0
520
12 -4637 -8916
SIG.HELLMAN &S.B.RD,
4,300
0
1,120
12 -4637 -8918
SIG.SPRUCE &TERRAVISTA
980
0
490
12- 4637 -8919
SIG.I9TH /SAPHIRE
525
0
530
12 -4637 -8921
SIG, COORD:VNYRD /CARNELI
9,760
20,000
1,470
12- 4637 -8922
UNF TRFC CNTRL FROG
11,000
0
0
12- 4637 -8942
FOOTHILL ®ROCHESTER
221,524
0
219,270
12- 4637 -8943
SIG. BSLN Q ROCHESTER
106,734
0
0
12 -4637 -9042
VINMAR AVE
7,805
0
0
12 -4637 -9101
SIG.HIGHLAND &ROCHSTR
0
176,000
8,790
12- 463'7 -9102
SIG, VINEYARD & ARROW
0
134,000
0
12 -4637-
OTY WIDE ST REHAB (92 -93)
0
0
0
12 -4637-
SIGNAL MILLIKEN ® FAIR MNT
0
0
0
12 -4637-
SIGNAL BASELINE ® EAST AVE
0
0
0
12 -4937-
SIGNAL HAVEN Q BANYAN
0
0
0
12 -4637 TOTAL:
1,529,887
492,050
341,610
S(o
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP 6 ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM na FYE BUDGET 06130AJ2
13 -4563
COMM SRVCS - RECREATN
13- 4563 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
0
13 -4663 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
43,672
69,800
81,000
13- 4563 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
5,580
5,580
13- 4563 -3900
MAINT80PERATIONS
135,338
178,070
131,870
13- 4563 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
3,584
4,510
5,420
13- 4563 -5900
ADMIN. /GENERAL OVERHEAD
90,087
91,870
101,320
13- 4663 -6026
CONTRACT SERVICES
302,314
273,060
308,060
13- 4563 -7043
CAPITAL EXP- FACILITY
1,955
8,500
8,500
13 -4663 -7044
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
0
8,200
8,200
13 -4563 TOTAL:
576,949
639.590
649,960
14 -4166
AIR OUALITV IMPRMNT GRANT
14 -4166 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
11,930
14- 4158 -19%
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
4.180
14- 4166 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
14- 4158 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
0
14 -4158 TOTAL:
0
0
16,110
16 -4637
PED.GRANT /ARTS
16- 4637 -3860
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
16 -4637-
HANDICAP RAMPS (VAR.LOCA)
0
0
0
16 -4637 TOTAL:
0
0
0
19 -4637
DRAINAGE PAC: ETIWANDA
19- 4637 -1100
REGULAR PAYROLL
8,691
0
3,000
19 -4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
1,050
19- 4637 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
5,560
0
0
19 -4637 -8154
ETIWANDA STROM DRAINS
1,026
0
1,030
19 -4637 -8766
MSTR DRAINAGE PLAN
0
0
0
19- 4637 -6840
BASELINE S.D W /0115
473,027
0
16,890
19 -4637-
ETIWANDA DRAINAGE REIMS.
0
0
66,000
19 -4637 TOTAL'.
488,304
0
86,970
S 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990191 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DFSCRIPTION FNCUM GI FYF RHI)OPT 116 /3N09
20 -4532
PARK DEVELOPMENT
20- 4532 -1100
REGULAR PAYROLL
126,245
88,360
95,020
20- 4632 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
51,699
30,930
30,930
20- 4532 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
102,736
23,480
23,480
20- 4532 -5900
ADMINIGENL OVERHEAD
938,720
340,050
340,050
20- 4532 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
15,000
0
20- 4532 -8006
LION'S PRK TENNIS CT
30,610
0
0
20- 4632 -0007
BERYL PRK TENNIS CRT
58,082
0
0
20- 4532 -8015
WEST BERYL PARK
384,491
0
1,200
20 -4632 -6770
CREEKSIDE PARK
51,867
0
13,740
20 -4532 -8926
SCHOOL PLYFLD UPGRADE
900,045
0
0
20- 4632 -0927
WE COMM PRK DB RETR
386,0.57
402,240
402,240
20- 4532 -8928
CTRL PRK DEBT RETR
1,243,657
1,287,900
1,287,900
20- 4532 -8929
HERIT.PW(.FIELD RNV
287,286
0
0
20 -4532 -8931
REROOF:HERT &REDHILL
9,500
0
0
20- 4532 -8954
RED MILL FIELD RENOV
180,506
0
0
20- 4632 -9009
WLM LYON REIMS
1,791,078
0
0
20- 4532 -9012
ETIWANDA H.S. INSTL.
25,660
0
0
20- 4632 -9013
R.C.ELSMENTARY INSTL
101,897
0
0
20- 4532 -9014
BEAR GULCH ELEM INSTL
16,288
0
0
20 -4632 -9016
VAR.SCHOOL IMPROV
16,862
0
0
20- 4532 -9016
COMM CTRS IMPROV
6,776
0
0
20- 4532 -9017
DON T. TAPIA PARK
2,229
0
0
20- 4532 -9018
N/E COMM PRK PURCHASE
250
0
0
20- 4532 -0103
C14AFFEY COLLEGE FIELD MNT
0
30,000
30,000
20- 4632 -9104
HERITAGE BALLFIELD LT RENOV
991
85,000
132,850
20- 4532 -9118
WINDROWS SECURITY LIGHTING
0
0
7,560
20 -4532 TOTAL:
6,713,532
2,302,960
2,364,970
21 -4647
BEAUTIFICATION FUND
21 - 4647 -1100
REGULAR PAYROLL
105,285
11,840
15.000
21- 4647 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
28,144
4,140
5,250
21 -4647 -6900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
180,330
0
0
21- 4647 -8/38
HAVEN BEAUTJMEDIANS
31,517
0
31,520
21 -4647 -0719
ENTRY MONUMENTS
298,970
1,000
44,650
21- 4647 -8791
BSLN- HELLMAN- ARCHBLD
257
0
0
21 -4647 -8794
HAVEN MEDIANS III
5,201
0
0
21 -4647 -8814
MILLIKEN MED IMP 14TH
286,315
1,000
42,030
21- 4647 -8822
ETIWANDA COBBLESTONE
0
25.000
0
21 "47-6071
CTYWIDE BEAUT/NEXUS
33,750
5,000
5,700
21- 4647 -8932
MONTE VISTA MED IMP
60,612
1,000
25,850
21 -4647 --8936
ROCHSTR E./FTHL/BSLN
3.921 994
1,000
381 480
21 -4647 TOTAL:
1,363,375
49,980
208,600
PRIM
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0 FYE BUDGET 0&30f
22 -4637
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUND
22- 4637 -1100
REGULAR PAYROLL
223,451
390,790
150,000
22 -4637 -1200
OVERTIME
0
0
0
22- 4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
103,110
136,780
136,780
22- 4637 -3900
MAINT30PERATIONS
0
0
0
22- 4637 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
117,850
300,000
300,000
22- 4637 -7044
C /O; EQUIPMENT
0
0
0
22- 4637 -9607
MILLKEN GRACE SEP
29,954
0
9,510
22- 4637 -8629
AERIAL MAPPING
70,502
0
70,510
22 -4634 -8729
19TH @AMETHYST
13,876
0
0
22- 4637 -8730
BASELINE WIDEN
568,767
5,000
141,380
22- 4637 -8731
BASELINE WIDEN ETIW
277,434
5,000
74,750
22- 4637 -8732
BASELINE WIDEN VIC,
82,862
500
0
22- 4637 -8735
ARROW WDEN ARCHIBALD
(17,299
0
0
22-4637 -8736
ARROW WIDEN BAKER
9,494
0
0
22- 4637 -8738
ARROW BRIDGE WIDEN
75,285
1,500
59,490
22- 4637 -8742
RAILROAD GRANT APP
1,278
0
0
22- 4637 -8743
19TH IMPRV W. LMTS
274,746
1,000
500
22- 4637 -8744
19TH IMPROV HERMOSA
395,769
1,000
20,950
22- 4637 -8745
19TH IMPROV. BERYL
46,991
20,000
.15,070
X2-4837 -5749
AMETHYST PECONA 9TH
788
0
0
L2- 4637 -8753
CHURCH IMPRV ARCHBLD /HAVEN
37.809
0
2,850
22- 4637 -8841
BASELINE @ MILLIKEN
30,000
0
0
22- 4637 -6849
HELLMAN RR XING @ SP
300
0
0
22- 4637 -8850
VINEYARD RR @ ATBSF
7,145
0
0
22 -4637 -8861
HAVEN RR XING @ ATSF
0
100,000
17,920
22- 4637 -8852
19TH S.D. IMP
18,061
0
18,070
22- 4637 -8866
WILSON IMP- AMETHYST
0
500
0
22- 4637 -8856
ARCH IMP /S /O BANY
0
500
0
22- 4637- -0868
ARROW IMP/HERMOSA
115,986
1,000
0
22 -4637 -8936
HAVEN REHBATHN.FTHL
587
0
0
22 -4637 -8937
CARNNNE REHAB
2,500
0
0
22- 4637 -8940
SIG.BSLN /ETMWANDA
94,020
0
24,920
22- 4637 -8941
SIG.BSLN/VICTORIA PK
95,927
0
14,800
22 -4637 -0942
SIG.NTR- FTHL @ROCH
142,831
0
53,110
22 -4637 -8943
SIG.BSLN /ROCHESTER
665
0
670
22- 4637 -8946
SIG. ARROW 6 HERMOSA
(16,383
0
2,820
22 -4637 -8946
UPGHD SIG.FTHL@HAVN
3,114
0
3,120
22- 4637 -8980
BANNER POLES
13,064
0
1,430
22- 4637 -9022
RCHSTR- VICTORIA P.L
10,131
0
1,770
22- 4637 -9023
BANYAN BRIDGE @DRCRK
0
0
0
22 -4637-
ROCHESTER- HGHLNO TO BANYAN
0
0
0
22 -4637-
BANYAN -MT BALDY PL- RCHSTR
0
0
0
22 -4637-
BANYAN -ESTWD TO HELLMAN
0
0
0
22 -4637-
ARROW ® RR SPUR W/O MILLIKEN
0
0
0
22- -4637-
HIGHLAND @LOCUST NTERSEC,
0
0
0
22 -4637-
ROCHESTER @ STSF RR
0
0
0
22 -4637-
BASELINE @ARCHIBALD
0
0
0
22 -4637-
BASELINE @ CARNELIAN
0
0
0
22 -4637 TOTAL:
2,830,615
963,570
1,148,420
51
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL ETP 6 ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NI I MRFR npRn.MPnnu
23 -4637
GENERAL CTIY DRAINAGE
23- 4637 -1100
REGULAR PAYROLL
57,077
14,040
18,670
23 -4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
34,022
4,910
4,910
23- 4637 -5900
ADMINIGENERAL OVERHEAD
98 ,100
300,000
240,950
23 -4637 -8761
TURNER/HERMOSA
10,591
0
1,040
23- 4637 -6763
HELLMN /CUCCRKr RYON
2,858
0
2,860
23- 4637 -8766
MSTR DRAINAGE PLAN
85,580
0
85,580
23- 4637 -8784
BERYL CRK PASTA DRAIN
22,063
0
7,400
23- 4637 -8785
CUCAM.DAY,DR CRK
0
3,000
0
23 -4637 -8847
AREA III -COCA S.D.
19,221
0
0
23- 4637 -8859
AREA 11 CARNELIAN
10,593
0
10,600
23- 4637 -6660
AREA If CUCA SPRRSD
6,396
0
6,310
23- 4637 -8862
AREA V HILLSIDE RD
178,562
0
9,320
23 -4637 -8863
AREA VI LEMON S.D.
5,206
2,000
1,230
23- 4637 -8865
AREA II AMETHYST S.D.
150,254
1,000
0
23- 4637 -8947
AREA IV S.D.DEER CK
$2,106
0
13,920
23- 4637 -8948
AREA IV SMATH 66
42,526
0
40,580
23- 4637 -8949
AREA VI HGHLND SD -LWR A
15,682
0
13,800
28 -4637 -8961
SIERRA MADRE -S /O ARW
343,326
331,000
3on,510
123- 4637 -9990
123
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS
0
0
2,500
-4637 TOTAL'.
I
I 1,134,160
655,950
BSQ 180
24 -4637
FEDERAL AID URBAN (FAU) FUND
24- 4637 -1100
REGULAR PAYROLL
25,215
26,860
44,570
24- 4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
12,079
9,400
11,900
24 -4637 -8775
ARRW /CUCACREEK
333,438
8,500
256,960
24- 4637 -6838
HAVEN AVE REHAB.
125,158
850,000
16,580
24 -4637 TOTAL:
495,891
894,760
330,010
25-42M
CAPITAL RESERVE FUND I
GENERAL OVERHEAD
25 -4285 -3900
MAINT. A OPERATIONS
0
0
0
25- 4285 -7043
CAPITAL EXP -BLDG IMP
851,409
0
0
26- 4286 -7044
CAPITAL EXP -EQUIP
0
0
0
25- 4285 -3011
CENTRAL PAWL AGOSTN
0
0
0
26 --4286 -8960
COMM.EVENT BANNER POLES
2,032
0
0
25 -4285 TOTAL
653,441
0
0
Leo
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCALYEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL E%P 8, ADOPTED E%PENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM Q FYE BUDGET 0630
(P I
26 -4532
ROBERTI Z'BERG GRANT FUND
26 -4532 -8768
HARD COURT RETROFIT
0
0
34,470
26 -4532 TOTAL.
0
0
34,470
27 -4632
1908 CONSERVATION GRANT
27 -4632 -8767
NIE COMMUNITY PARK ACOUISITI
0
0
0
27 -4632 TOTAL:
p
0
0
28 -4333
C,D.B.G FUND
28- 4333 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
144,190
0
28 -4333 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
50,470
0
28- 4333 -.8185
ADMINISfRAI ION
117,830
5,000
86,440
28 -0333 -8187
FAIR HOUSING
171
7,790
7,790
28 -4333 -8189
HOUSING REHAB.
147,262
148,140
96,870
28 -1333 -8191
BLOCK GRANT
0
0
0
28- 4333 -8193
SENIOR SHR'D HOUSING
10,367
0
0
28- 4333 -8194
FERON BLVD.
0
0
0
28- 4333 -8704
VIA CARILLO IMPRV
0
0
0
28- 4333 -8811
SIERRA MADRE /PLACIDA
7,261
0
0
28- 4333 -8012
AVENIDAVEJAR
0
0
0
28- 4333 -8951
SIERRA MORE -S /O ARW
4,494
142,590
14,830
28 -4333 -8962
SAUNA- ViNMAR DESIGN
0
0
0
28- 4333 -8955
HIST.PRESERVREHAB,
9,021
158,090
112,480
28- 4333 -9025
S/W CUCAMONGA STS.
62
271,390
87,650
28 -4333 -9042
VINMAR DESIGN
5,276
0
7,330
28- 4333 -9043
SIERRA MADRE DESIGN
12,750
0
8,790
28- 4333 -9m
CALAVERAS DESIGN
9,103
0
4,200
28- 4333 -9045
GRAFFIJTI REMOVAL
2.014
20,000
10,340
20- 1333 -9106
NEIGHBORHOOD CTR IMPROV
0
67,780
0
28- 4333 -9106
WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS
0
11,410
0
20- 4333 -91W
SIDEWALK GRINDING
0
12,170
530
28- 4333 -9114
LANDLORD TENANT MEDIATION
0
0
5,000
28 -4333 -9115
CALAVERAS AVE.(AROW TO 9TH)
0
0
0
28 -4333 -9116
CHAFFEY GARCIA REHAB,
0
0
0
28 -4333-
HOMELESS OUTREACH
0
0
0
26 -4333-
HOUSE OF RUTH
0
0
0
28 -4333-
OLD TIMERS FOUNDATIION
0
0
0
29 -4333-
CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
28 -4333 TOTAL,
325,613
1,039,420
442,250
(P I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM FVE BUDGET 0630
31 -4532
1986 PARK BOND ACT GRANT FUND
31- 4532 -8768
HARD COURT RETROFIT
0
0
50,000
31 -4532 TOTAL:
0
0
50,000
32 -4637
MEASURE
32-4637 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
109,780
173,100
32- 4637 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
0
2,390
0
32 -4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
19,054
38,610
60,540
32- 4637 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
0
0
14,900
32- 4637 -8841
BASELINE /MLLIKEN REIMS
0
250,000
250,000
32- 4637 -8851
HAVEN RRXING p ATSF
184,976
50,000
0
32- 4637 -9027
HAVEN ST IMPROV PHI
55,165
0
336,720
32- 4637 -9109
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE INV
0
17,000
0
32 -4637 -9110
PAVEMENT MGMT PROGRAM
0
5,400
20,000
32- 463'. -9111
HIGHLANDIROCHESTER INT.
0
100,000
0
3.^.-4637 -9112
HAVEN REHAB(4TH N FTHL)
0
150,000
0
3;:- 4637 -9113
STREET REHAB
0
0
200,000
0
32 -4637-
ARROW ® RR W/O MILLKEN
0
0
0
32 -4637-
19TH ST(CRNUAN- W /O AMTHYST)
0
0
0
a -4637 TOTAL:
259,195
922,780
855,260
33 -4131
SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMIN
33- 4131 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
101,186
137,460
120,000
33- 4131 -1200
OVERTIME
139
0
0
33- 4131 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
47,698
48,110
48,110
33- 4131 -3100
TRAVEL& MEETINGS
1,294
500
500
33 - 4131 -3300
MILEAGE
655
710
710
33- 4131 -3900
MAINT &OPERATIONS
23,L13
67,500
67,500
33 -4131 -3960
GE,:'. -VL LIABILITY
775
780
780
&3- 4131 -6029
0CN7RACT SERVICES
48,370
61,890
61,890
33- 4131 -7044
CAPITAL EXP - EQUIPMENT
7,176
0
0
33 -4131 TOTAL:
231,106
316,950
299,490
34 -4632
PUBLIC RESOURCES GRANT
34- 4632 -6924
N/E COMM.PARK DESIGN/DMLPMN
0
0
0
34 -4532 TOTAL.
0
0
0
to z
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990;91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0 FYE BUDGET 06/30/92
35 -4637
SO 140 FUND
35- 4637 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
2340
35 -4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
350
35- 4637 -9030
MILU KEN ® ATSF
685,273
0
277,550
36- 4637-9001
19TH(CARNLIAN/AMTHY)
0
0
0
35- 4637 -9033
FTHL(RT661151NTRCHNG)
0
600,000
0
35- 4637 -9035
BASELINE IMP PHASE I
1,000
900
1,000
35- 4637 -9108
ROCHESTER (VPL /HIGHLAND)
0
35,850
0
35 -4637 TOTAL:
686,273
636,750
281,240
36 -4637
INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT
36- 4637 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
193,950
36- 4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
67,880
36- 4637 -3900
MAINT &OPERATIONS
0
0
125,450
36- 4637 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
2,010
36 -4637 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
0
75,000
36 -4637 TOTAL'.
0
0
464,290
40 -4130
LMDF1 GENERAL
40- 4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
188
48,880
48,880
40 -4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
17,110
17,110
40 -4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
40,940
42820
42,820
40 -41 W -3900
MAINT E OPERATIONS
15.753
52900
25,000
40 -4130 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT& OPER
0
17,940
17,940
40- 4130 -3940
CONTNGCY -TREE RPLMNT
500
3,500
2,220
40- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
2,410
0
0
40- 4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
40- 4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
47,620
47,620
40- 4130 -6026
TRAIL MAINTENANCE
2,718
0
0
40- 4130 -6027
CONT SRV- VNDLSM /IRRG
2,500
0
0
40 -4130 -6028
CONT SRV -REG MAINT
153,869
205,050
272,150
40- 4130 -6029
TREE MAINTiLNDSCP AD
884
0
0
40 -4130 -7043
CAPi1'AL EXP- PROJECTS
0
80,200
2220
40- 4130 -7044
CAPITAL EXP- EQUIPMNT
0
0
0
40 -4130 -7045
CAPITAL EXP- VEHICLES
0
0
0
40 -4130 -9021
WATER UTILITIES
36,573
122,210
79,130
40 -4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
9,536
16,040
13,W0
40 -4130 -8767
N/E COMMUNITY PARK
42
140,000
5,000
40 -4130 TOTAL:
265,913
794,270
573,090
�O 3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM FYE BUDGET 06130192
41 -4130
LIVID #2 VICTORIA
41- 4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
252,700
258,630
41 - 4130 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
0
0
3,770
41- 4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
88,450
90,520
41- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADMIN
17,060
19,170
19,170
41- 4130 -3900
MAINT& OPERATIONS
8,822
19,700
25,000
41- 4130 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT& OPER
0
99,260
40,360
41- 4130 -3940
CONTNGCY- TREERPLMNT
500
0
1,+ +.,630
41 -4130 -3941
LOAN REPAYMENT
0
0
0
41- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
5,827
0
0
41- 4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
41 -4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
127,290
127,290
41 -4130 -6026
TRAIL MAINTENANCE
187
0
0
41- 4130 -6027
CONT SRV- VNDLSM/IRRG
44,100
0
0
41- 4130 -6028
CONT SRV -REG MAWT
338,213
57S,000
661,000
41- 4130 -6029
TREE MAINT /LNDSCP AD
0
0
0
41 -4130 -7043
CAPITAL D(P- PROJECTS
0
79,590
23,630
41- 4130 -7044
CAPITAL EXP- EQUPMNT
0
0
0
41 - 4130 -7044
CAPITAL EXP- VEHICLES
0
0
0
41- 4130 -8021
WATER UTILITIES
126,654
413,390
345,580
41- 4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
12,777
26,830
16,000
41- 4130 -8023
RRIG RESTORATIO14
73,600
0
73,350
41 -4130 -8026
PARK MAINTENANCE
81,553
10
41 -4i30 -8769
APLCMNT CNTRCT WW
0
0
0
41 -4130-
IRRIGATION RENOVATION
0
0
0
41 -4130 TOTAL:
709,293
1,701,380
1,696,580
42 -4130
LMD N3A HYSSOP
42- 4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
40
150
42- 4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
10
50
42- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
32
40
40
42- 4130 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
0
210
210
42- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
10
0
0
42 -4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
42- 4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
200
230
230
42- 4130 -6027
CONT SRV- VNDLSM /IPRG
0
0
0
42 -4130 -6028
CONT SRV- REG MAINT
1,619
1,740
1,710
42- 4130 -0021
WATER UTILITIES
581
800
680
42- 4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
99
110
110
42 -4130-
IRRIGATION RENOVATION
0
0
0
42 -4130 TOTAL:
2,541
3,180
3,180
6 4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM @1 FYE BUDGET 06/30/92
43 -4130
LIVID #4 TERRA VISTA
43-4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
173,760
196,720
43 -4130 -1300
PART -TIME SALARIES
0
0
2,640
43- 4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
60,820
681860
43- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
1ZS04
8,880
8,880
43- 4130 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
14177
61,320
28.000
43 -4130 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT& OPEN
0
85,200
50,000
43- 4130 -3940
CONTNGCY -TREE RPLMNT
500
3,300
2,470
43 -4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
3,120
0
0
43- 4130 -3981
DEUNQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
43 -4130 -5900
ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
54,420
54,420
43- 4130 -6027
CONT SRV- VNDLSM/IRRG
18,900
0
11680
43- 4130 -6028
CONT SRV- REG MAINT
73,563
146,100
161,000
43- 4130 -6029
TREE MAINT /LNDSCP AD
0
0
0
43 -4130 -7043
CAPITAL EXP- PROJECTS
0
43,700
11,470
43 -4130 -7044
CAPITAL EXP- EQUIPMNT
0
0
0
43- 4130 -7045
CAPITAL EXP- VEHICLES
0
0
0
43- 4130 -8021
WATER UTILITIES
42,426
111,060
76,000
43- 4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
6,588
12,520
8,000
43- 4130 -8026
PARK MAINTENANCE
24,793
0
0
43- 4130 -8966
TERRA VISTA/BSLN IVIED
754
123,000
0
43 -4130 TOTAL',
195,322
884,080
670,140
44 -4130
LIVID 85 TOT LOT
44- 4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
360
360
44 -4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
130
130
44- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
176
200
200
44- 4130 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
0
490
490
44- 4130 -3905
CONTINGENCY -TREES
0
0
0
44- 4130 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT& OPER
0
70
70
44 -4130 -3940
CONTNGCY -TREE RPLMNT
50
50
0
44- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
88
0
0
44-4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
44 -4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
320
320
44- 4130 -6027
CONT SRV- VANDALISM
250
0
160
44- 4130 -6028
CONT SRV- REG MAINT
3,207
2,470
2,430
44 -4130 -6029
TREE MAINT /LNDSCP AD
0
0
0
44 -4130 -7043
CAPITAL EXP- PROJECTS
0
0
0
44- 4130 -7045
CAPITAL EXP- VEHICLES
0
0
0
44- 4130 -6021
WATER UTILITIES
180
200
220
44 -4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
100
130
150
44-4130-
C/O PLYGRND EQUIP /FENCE REST
0
0
0
44 -4130 TOTAL
4,051
4,420
4,530
tO!
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990191 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNTNUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM@FYE BUDGET 06/30/91
45 -4130
LIVID k5 TOT LOT
46 -4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
6,670
7,510
45- 4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
2,330
2.630
45- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADMIN
4,684
5,850
5,850
45- 4130 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
1,956
15,380
3,380
46- 4130 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT& OPER
0
1,910
1,910
45- 4130 -3940
CONTNGCY -TREE RPLMNT
4,400
0
630
45- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
1,381
0
0
45- 4130 -3980
ASSESSMENT DIST. REFUND
0
0
88,140
45- 4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
45- 4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
20,660
20,660
45- 4130 -6026
TRAIL MAINTENANCE
15
0
0
45- 4130 -6027
CONT SRV- VNDLSM /IRRG
9,000
0
0
45- 4130 -6028
CONT SRV- REG MAINT
205,540
170,060
255,000
45- 4130 -6029
TREE MAINT /LNDSCP AD
246
0
0
45- 4130 -7043
CAPITAL EXP- PROJECT
0
17,660
12,000
45- 4130 -7044
CAPITAL EXP- EOUIPMNT
0
0
0
45 -4130 -7045
CAPITAL EXP - VEHICLES
0
0
0
45- 4130 -8021
WATER UTILITIES
23,406
45,940
55,370
45 -4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
397
1,540
600
46- -4130-
PLANT MATERIAL RENOVATION
0
0
0
45 -4130 TOTAL:
251,025
288,000
453,680
46 -4130
LMD F38 MEDIANS
46- 4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
2,530
14,380
46- 4130 -19M
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
890
5,040
46- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTAOMIN
728
1,940
1,940
46- 4130 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
7,558
30,800
15,000
46- 4130 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT& OPER
0
1,030
1,030
46- 4130 -3940
CONTNGCY -TREE HPLMNT
500
0
0
46- 4130-3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
845
0
0
46 -4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
46 -4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
21.650
21,850
46- 4130 -6027
CONT SRV- VNDLSM /IRRG
7,790
0
0
46- 4130 -6028
CONT SRV- REG MAINT
95,472
152,800
172,830
46- 4130 -6029
TREE MAINT /LNOSCP AD
1,807
0
0
46- 4130 -7043
CAPITAL EXP- PROJECTS
0
28,530
0
46- 4130 -7044
CAPITAL EXP- EQUIPMNT
0
0
0
46- 4130 -7045
CAPITAL EXP -TREES
0
0
0
46- 4130 -6021
WATER UTILITIES
11,835
57,430
30,580
46- 4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
2,772
4,050
3,200
46- 4130-8026
PARK MAINTENANCE
0
0
0
46 -4130 TOTAL:
129,x17
301,6.50
265,650
14
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1995091 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNTNUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0 FYE BUDGET 06,'30192
to 1
47 -4130
LMD M7 NORTH ETIWANDA
47- 4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
3,750
18,000
47- 4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
1,310
6,300
47- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADMIN.
2.880
3,850
3,850
47- 4130 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
77
25,420
4,000
47 -4130 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT& OPER
0
1,330
S00
47- 4130 -3540
CONTNGCV -TREE RPLMNT
3,000
14,000
0
47- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABLITY
432
0
0
47- 4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
47 -4130 -6900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
17,610
17,610
47- 4130 -8026
TRAIL MAINTENANCE
0
0
0
47 -4130 -6027
CONTSRV- VNDLSM4/IRRG
0
0
0
47- 4130 -6028
CONT SRV -REG MAINT
0
146,230
80,000
47- 4130 -6029
TREE MAINT/LNOSCP AD
0
0
0
47- 4130 -7043
CAPITAL EXP - PROJECTS
0
10,000
0
47 -4130 -7044
CAPITAL EXP- EQUPMNT
0
0
0
47- 4130 -7046
CAPITAL EXP- VEHICLES
0
0
0
47- 4130 -8021
WATER UTILITIES
0
21,250
2,000
47- 4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
0
740
100
47 -4130 TOTAL:
6,389
245,490
132,360
48 -4130
LMD Me SOUTH ETIWANDA
48- 4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
30
210
49 -4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
80
70
48- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
292
370
370
46- 4130 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
75
2,210
200
48- 4130 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT /OPER
0
370
0
48- 4130 -3940
CONTNGCY -TREE RPLMNT
500
840
0
48- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABLITY
0
0
0
48- 4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
49- 4130 -6000
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
800
800
48 -4130 -6028
CONT SRV -REG MAINT
0
5,700
3,000
O -4130-
PLANT MATERIAL RENOVATION
0
0
0
48- 4130 -8021
WATER UTILITIES
0
610
300
48- 4130-9022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
0
80
40
48 -4130 TOTAL'.
867
11,090
4,990
54 -4245
CITYWIDE: STREET LIGHTS
54 -4245 -6040
GENR'L CITY ST LIGHT3
469,869
467,500
460,000
54 -4245 TCTAL
469,869
467,500
460,000
to 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990(91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP A ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM nc FYE BUOCFT 06 /30/92
55 -4130
SLD M1 ARTERIAL
55- 4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
80
66- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADMIN
57,760
75,810
75,810
55- 4130 -3900
MAINTJOPERATIUNS
0
30,000
30,000
55 -4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABLI!Y
5,906
0
0
55- 4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
55- 4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
15,390
15,390
56- 4130 -6028
CONT. SRV-REG. MAINT
1,021
5,470
3,970
55- 4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
77,926
92,570
92,570
66 -4/30 TOTAL:
142,613
219,240
217,820
66 -4130
SLD Y2 RESIDENTIAL
66- 4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
230
56- 4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
56- 4130-1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
19,524
26,090
26,090
56- 4130 -3900
MAINTJOPERATIONS
0
35,060
5,000
56 -4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
4,354
0
0
56- 4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
56- 4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
8,350
8,350
66- 4130 -6028
CONT 6RV- REG MAINT
1,118
9,870
2,880
56 -4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
74,452
80,000
110,060
66 -4130 TOTAL:
99,447
159,370
152,610
67 -4130
SLD /3 VICTORIA
67 -4190 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADMIN
15,848
19,010
19,010
57- 4130 -3900
MAINTJOPERATIONS
0
10,000
10,000
67 -4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
3,135
0
0
57- 4130 -3961
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
57 -4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
5,900
5,900
57- 4130 -6028
CONT SRV- REG MAINT
957
0
1,830
57- 4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
68 ,226
66,260
80,870
57 -4130 TOTAL:
88,167
101,170
117,610
(o �
Cl (Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP 6 ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DFSCRIPrnN FNCI 0.1 n WYE RIInrR . /I..
58 -4130
SLD k4 TERRA VISTA
58- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADM IN
7,124
8,920
8,920
68 -4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
0
58- 4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
58- 4130 -3900
MAINT /OPERATIONS
0
50,000
30,000
58- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
2,537
0
0
58- 4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
68- 4130 -6900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
5,220
5,220
58 -4130 -6028
CONT SRV -REG MAINT
438
15,000
2,340
68- 4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
23,392
50,000
28,000
58 -4130 TOTAL',
33,491
129,140
74,480
69 -4130
SLID Y6 CARYN COMMUNITY
69 -4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
0
59 -4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
69 - 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADMIN
4,680
5,850
5,850
59- 4130 -3900
MAINTJOPERATIONS
0
21,550
14,200
59- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
1,008
0
0
59 -4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
59 -4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
1,760
1,760
59- 4130 -6020
CONT SRV -AEG MANT
84
10,000
980
59- 4130 -7044
CAPITAL EXP- EQUPMNT
0
0
0
69- 4130 -
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
0
0
0
59- 4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILDIES
11,137
15,000
16,100
59 -4130 TOTAL:
16,909
54,160
38,890
60 -4130
SLID M6 INDUSTRIAL AREA
60- 4130 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
0
60- 4130 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
60- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADMIN
5,568
1,670
1,670
60- 4130 -3900
MAINTaOPERATIONS
0
2,500
2,500
60- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
601
0
0
60- 4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
60 -4130 -6900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
1.300
1,300
60 -4130 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
6,580
410
60 -4130-
STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION
0
0
0
60- 4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
2,769
10,500
4,000
60 -4130 TOTAL:
8,938
22,550
9,880
to y
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DFSCRIPTION FNOI IM /nt FVF RI IDRET n6101IM2
61 -4130
SLD N7 NORTH ETIWANDA
61 -4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
0
1,930
1,930
61 -4130 -3900
MAINTJOPEiATIONS
0
1,080
650
61- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABLITY
0
0
0
61 -4130 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
61- 4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
930
930
61- 4130 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
0
61- 4130 -6022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
0
9,000
1,000
61 -4130 TOTAL:
0
12,940
4,510
62 -4130
SLD *8 SOUTH ETIWANDA
62- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADMIN
0
10
10
62- 4130 -3900
MAINTJOPERATIONS
0
10
0
62 -4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
62- 4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
10
10
62- 4130 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
0
62 -4130 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
0
100
0
62 -4130 TOTAL:
0
130
20
63 -4130
AD 89- 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
63- 4130 -3900
MAINT80PERATIONS
0
0
3,582,520
63 -4130 -3960
GENERALLIABLITY
0
0
0
63 -4130 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
51,219
5,000
20,810
63 -4130 TOTAL:
51,218
5,000
3,603,330
64 -4130
AD 89 -1 REDEMPTION
64- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADMIN
0
0
0
64 -4130 -3900
MAINT& OPERATIONS
0
0
0
64 -4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
64 -4130 -7920
PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE
0
0
0
64 -4130 TOTAL:
0
0
0
66 -4130
AD 69- -1 RESERVES
66 -4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADMIN
0
0
0
65- 4130 -3900
MAINT& OPERATIONS
0
0
a
66- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
65 -4130 -7920
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
0
65 -,4130 TOTAL',
0
0
0
76
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990191 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM as FYE BUDGET 06 /30/92
72 -4225
INTER -GOVT SERVICES
72- 4225 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
0
0
72 -4225 -1200
OVERTIME
0
0
0
72- 4225 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
0
72- 4225 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
0
0
0
72 -4225 -3930
FUEL
9,617
0
0
72- 4225 -3931
MAINT & OPERATIONS
0
0
0
72- 4226 -3942
ACCUM. DEPRECIATION
0
0
0
72- 4225 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
72- 4226 -7046
CPT'L EXP- VEHICLES
0
0
0
72 -4225 TOTAL:
SEE COST CENTER 4637
0
0
0
72 -4637
INTER -GOVT SERVICES
72- 4637 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
143,146
0
0
72- 4637 -1200
3,142
0
0
72- 4637 -1300
(OVERTIME
PART -TIME SALARIES
0
0
0
72- 4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
99,334
0
0
72- 4637 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
94,705
0
0
72- 4637 -3930
FUEL
59,091
0
0
72- 4637 -3931
VEHICLE MAINT &OPER
158,315
0
0
72 -4637 -3942
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
157,339
0
0
M- 4637 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
4,472
0
0
72- 4637 -6027
HAZARDOUS WST RMVL
7.434
0
0
72 -4637 -7043
CAPITAL EXP- BUILDING
0
0
0
72- 4637 -7044
CAP ,EXP. - COMPUTER
0
0
0
72- 4637 -7045
CAP.EXP. /RPLC VEH ED
12,526
0
0
72 -4637 TOTAL:
749,121
0
0
73 -4265
PERSONNEL OVERHEAD
73- 4265 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
26,996
0
0
73- 4265 -2050
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
132,481
0
0
73 -4266 TOTAL
159,478
0
0
71
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP & ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM.0 FYF BUDGET OS /3082
75 -4130
lAD 88 -2 ETWDAIHIGHLD IMP
75- 4130 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
28,576
60,000
81,600
75 -4130-
REGN'L MAINLINE FLO CNTRL PRJ
0
0
615,000
75 -4130 TOTAL:
28,576
60,000
696,600
76 -4130
CFD SB -2 FLOOD /SPEC DIST
76- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
1,850
2.400
2,400
76- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
76- 4130 -5900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
0
47,600
47,600
76 -4130 -7920
PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE
0
420,340
0
76 -4130 TOTAL:
1,850
470,340
50,000
78 -4130
CFD 88-2 LAW ENFORC.
78- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
524
1,200
1,200
78- 4130 -3900
MAINT& OPERATIONS
0
0
0
78 -4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
78- 4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
840
840
78- 4130 -6023
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
9,090
9,090
78-- 4130 -7920
PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE
0
0
0
78 -4130 TOTAL,
524
11,130
11,130
80 -4637
AD 84 -2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL
80 -4637 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
13,498
0
11,000
60- 4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
3,850
80 -4637 -6028
CONT SRV- REG MAINT
1,925
0
680
60-4637 -7043
CAPITAL EXP- BUILDING
0
0
600
80- -4637-
CAPITAL EXP - PROJECTS
0
66,000
0
80 -4637 TOTAL
15,423
66,000
15,934
81 -4130
ASSES DST 34 --2 RDEMP
St- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
0
0
0
81 -4130 TOTAL'
0
0
0
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990(91 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM ld FYE BUDGET 06/30/92
81-4637
ASSES DST 84 -2 RDEMP
et- 4 637 -1001
SS
ASSESSMENT ADMIN
1,600
1,510
1,510
81- 4637 -3900
MAINT& OPERATIONS
0
4,000
4,000
81- 4637 -3960
GENERAL LLABL17Y
0
0
0
81- 4637 -59W
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
3,320
3,320
81- 4637 -7920
PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE
183,723
187,0W
187,000
01 -4637 TOTAL:
185,323
195,830
195,830
63 -4637
AD 82 -1 /6TH ST
83- 4637 -1100
REGULAR PAYROLL
3,458
60,980
18,000
83- 4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
21,112
21,340
21,340
83- 4637 -3900
MAINT & OPERATIONS
0
0
SW
83- 4637 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
63- 4637 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
32,240
422.000
84,100
83 -4637 TOTAL'.
56,810
504.320
123,940
W -4637
AD(MelloRnos) e4 -1 DAY CREEK
88- 4837 -6028
CONTRACTSERVICES
2.085,381
0
0
W -4637 TOTAL:
2,065,381
0
0
87 -4130
AD 84- 1 REDEMP. FUND
87- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT ADMIN.
9,000
18,400
18,400
87 -41 W -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
87 -41W TOTAL:
9,OW
18,400
18,400
87 -4637
AD 84 -1 REDEMP. FUND
87- 4637 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
87- 4637 -6900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
89,350
89,350
87- 4637 -7920
PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE
1,ODC,()O
2,032,290
2,140,680
87 -4637 TOTAL
1,000,000
2,121,640
2,230,030
13
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXPG ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM a FYE BUDGET D6 /30/92
88 -4532
PD 85 HERITAGE IMPR
88- 4532 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
32.435
0
290,290
88 -4532 TOTAL:
32,435
0
290,290
69 -4532
PD -86 RED HILL IMPR
89 -4532 -6026
CONTRACT SERVICES
76,765
0
105,420
69 -4532 TOTAL:
76,765
0
105,420
90 -4130
PARK DIST, 85 REDEMP.
90 -4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
87.584
122,770
122,770
90- 4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
90- 4130 -6900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
122,420
122,420
90 -4130 TOTAL:
87,584
245,190
245,190
90 -4532
PARK DIST. 85 RE.DEMP
90- 4632 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
90- 4532 -7920
PAYMENT TO TRUSTEE
605,965
820.000
820,000
90 -4532 TOTAL:
805,965
820,000
820,000
90 -4637
PARK DIST. 85 REDEMP
90 -4637 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
0
191,740
191,740
90 -4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
21,243
67.110
67,110
90- 4637 -3900
MAINTJOPERATIONS
0
45,000
35,000
90- 4637 -3931
VEHICLE MAINTIOPERATIONS
0
40,000
20,000
90 -4637 -3932
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
0
5,000
7,000
90- 4637 -3960
GENERALLIABILITY
0
0
0
90- 4637 -3981
DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
90 -4637 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
40,000
20,000
90 -4637 -7043
CAPITAL E %P- BUILDING
0
0
0
90- 4637 -7044
GAPITAL EXP- EQUIPMNT
0
0
0
90 -4637 -8021
WATER UTILITIES
0
67,000
60,000
90- 4637 -8022
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
0
70.000
60.000
90 -4837-
RESURFACE EOUEST. RNVK/HERITA
0
0
0
90- 4637 -
INSTALL COMP, TOUCH PAD SYSTa
0
0
0
90 -4837 TOTAL',
21,243
525,850
460,850
74
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990191 1991192 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP6 ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM 0 FYE BUDGET 06130192
90 -4991
PO -85 REDEMPTION FND
90 -4991 -9000
TRANSFERS OUT
141.151
0
81,900
90 -4991 TOTAL:
141,151
0
81,900
91 -4991
PD -86 RESERVED FUND
91 -4991 -9000
TRANSFERS OUT
141,151
0
0
91-4991 TOTAL:
141,151
0
0
93 -4130
AD 82 -iR RDEMP
93- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENT'nMIN
665
1,330
1,330
93 -4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
93- 4130 -7920
PAYMENT TO TRUSTEE
745.313
781,000
737,460
93 -4130 TOTAL
746,178
782,330
73P,790
93 -4637
AD 82 -iR RDEMP
93- 4637 -3900
MAINTB OPERATIONS
0
4,000
0
93 -4637 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
93- 4637 -5900
ADMfN/GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
2,920
2.920
93 -4637 -7920
PAYMENT TO TRUSTEE
0
0
0
93 -4637 TOTAL:
0
6,920
2,920
96 -4637
AD 66 -2R /C DRAINAGE DISTRICT
95- 4637 -1100
REGULAR SALARIES
30169
0
18C10
95- 4637 -1900
FRINGE BENEFITS
0
0
6,300
95 --4637 -3900
MAINT80PER
0
0
0
96- 4837 -3960
GENERAL LIABILITY
0
0
0
95- 4637 -6028
CONT SRV -AEG MAINT
9,561
0
9,570
96- -4637 -7043
CAPITAL EXP - PROJECTS
0
316,700
2,000
96 -1637 TOTAL:
39,730
316,700
35,870
7 s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiMONGA
AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 BUDGET
1990/91 1991/92 ESTIMATED
ACTUAL EXP& ADOPTED EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER nFSCRIPfinN aurtr w r_.
�b
96 -4130
AD 86 -2 RDEMP
96- 4130 -1001
ASSESSMENTADMIN
4,264
4,110
4,110
96- 4130 -3900
MAINT& OPERATIONS
0
4,000
2,000
96 -4130 -3960
GENERAL LIABLITY
0
0
0
96- 4130 -5900
ADMIN /GENERAL OVERHEAD
0
5,480
5,480
96 -4130 -7920
PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE
197,475
198,000
199,000
96 -4130 TOTAL:
201,739
211,590
210,590
120- 4285
800 MHZ RADIO
120 - 4285 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
88,590
120 - 4206 -7044
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - EQUIP.
0
0
1,663,710
120- 4285TOTAL
0
0
1,752,300
122 -4637
AD 91- 2 REDEMPTION
122- 4637 -6028
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
71100
122 -4637 TOTAL:
0
0
7,100
124 -4637
SBA FORESTRY& FIRE TREE GRAN
124- 4637 -6026
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
0
124 -4637 TOTAL
0
0
0
�b
--
- --...- - --...—
CITI' OF RAtiCHO C't'C'AM0NGA
STAFF REPORT
r r_ r,
OATS:
June 30,
1992
y
TO:
Mayor and
Members of the City Council
Jack Lam,
AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Jim Hart,
Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT:
ADOPTION
OF COMPENSATION RESOLUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR
92/93
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council adopt the attached resolution implementing compensation for
fiscal year (FY) 92/93.
BACKGROUND
Staff has completed the meet and confer process with City employee groups for
fiscal year 1992/93, and presents the attached resolution for your adoption.
The attached resolution reflects no adjustment in salary for fiscal
year 92/93. Minor modifications were made to the medical program co -pays and
prescription plan (co -pay went from $5.00 to $10.00 per visit and prescription
plan co -pay went from $5.00 to $10.00) to allow the City to continue payment
of the cost by averaging the cost of the programs within the amounts budgeted
for fiscal year 92/93.
The resolution reflects changes necessary in the employees' accrual rates for
vacation, sick leave, holiday, etc,., as a result of the 4/10 plan
implementation on August 3, 1992. The carpool and alternative transportation
incentive is being implemented through administrative policies being developed
and distributed to the employees, therefore, is not included as part of this
resolution. This in done to allow for administrative flexibility in handling
the programs on -going administration within the policy hounds set by the City
Council.
Although the resolution is being adopted on June 30, 1992, those sections in
the resolution that change as a result of the 4/10 plan implementation will
not be effective until August 2, 1992. Otherwise, all other sections become
effective at the beginning of the first pay period in July 1992.
Respectfully suhmitted,
i
_4X
Jim Hart
Adminstrative Services Director
Jll:rs
attachment II
RESOLUTION NO. 92-/9/./'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMO.NGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO, 91 -174
AND IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BEN:FITS FOR FISCAL YEAR
'.992/93
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
deterr': red that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of
t'ne City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits, and
holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes
that it competes in a marketplace to obtain qualified personnel to perform and
provide municipal services, and that compensation and conditions of employment
must be sufficiently attractive to recruit and retain qualified employees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
SECTION 1: Salary Ranaes
ASSIGNMENTS OF
CLASSIFICATIONS
TO PAY
RANGES
(Monthly
Amounts)
Control
Minimum
Point
Class Title
Step Amount
Step
Amount
Account Clerk 1
311
1,634
351
1,995
.Account Clerk II
331
1,805
371
2,204
Account Technician
366
2,150
406
2,624
Accountant#
405
2,611
445
3,188
Accounting Manager"
479
3,777
519
4,611
Accts Payable Supervisors!
396
2,497
436
3,048
Admin intern
283
8.20
323
10.01
Admin Secretary 1/
370
2,193
410
2,677
Admin Services Director+
551
5,408
591
6,603
Animal Control Officer I
333
1,823
373
2,226
Animal Control Officer II
353
2,015
393
2,459
Associate Engineer#
471
3,629
511
4,430
Associate Park Planner#
438
3,078
478
3,758
Associate Planner#
448
3,236
488
3,950
Asst Building Official"
506
4,321
546
5,275
Asst City Manager+
595
6,736
635
8,225
Asst Deputy City Clerk 1/
317
1,684
357
2,055
Asst Engineer#
441
3,125
481
3,815
Asst Landscape Designer#
396
2,497
436
3,048
Asst lark Planners
418
2,786
4S8
3,401
Asst Planner#
429
'2,943
469
3,593
Asst Pool Manager
268
7.61
308
5.29
Asst RDA Analyst$
408
2,650
448
3,236
Resolotion "la. 92-
?age 2
7q
Control
Minimum
Point
Class Title
Step
Amount
Step
Amount
Asst to City Manager*
494
4,070
534
1 ,969
Benefits Technician
345
1,936
385
2,363
Building Inspection Supv# 2/
450
3,268
490
3,990
Building Inspector 21
410
2,677
450
3,268
Building Official+
536
5,019
576
6,127
Business License Clerk
334
1,832
374
2,237
Business License Supv#
399
2,534
439
3,094
Bu54ness License Tech
364
2,128
404
2,598
Buyer#
396
2,497
436
3,048
Cashier /Ac6eUnt Clerk
311
1,634
351
1,995
City Engineer+
555
5,545
596
6,769
City Manager+
662
9,406
City °lanner+
548
5,3 98
588
6,505
Code Enforcement Officer 2/
394
2,472
434
3,017
Code Enforcement Supv4 21
424
2,871
464
3,505
Code Enforcement Tech
354
2,025
394
2,472
Community Dev Director+
586
6,440
626
7,864
Community Services Director+
541
5,145
581
6,281
Community Services Tech
380
2,305
420
2,814
Computer Operator
363
2,118
403
2,585
Counter Plans Examiner#
440
3,109
480
3,791
Crossinn Guards
203
5.50
243
6.72
Custodian
340
1,888
380
2,305
Data Base Mdnagmnt Analyst#
465
3,522
505
4,300
Data Processing Manager*
494
4,070
534
4,969
Deputy City Clerk#
378
2,282
416
2,786
Deputy City Engineer*
526
4,774
566
5,800
Deputy City Manager+
542
5,171
582
6,313
Deputy City Planner*
518
4,588
558
5,601
Disaster Prep Manager*
479
3,777
519
4,611
Disaster ?rep Specialist
389
2,411
429
2,943
Electrical Specialist# 21
430
2,958
470
3,611
Engineering Aide
381
2,317
421
2,828
Engineering Technician
401
2,560
441
3,125
Equipment Operator 2/
368
2,171
408
2,650
Executive Assistant*
409
2,664
449
3,252
Facilities Supervisor#
434
3,017
474
3,684
Finance Officer+
521
4,657
561
5,685
Fleet Maintenance .Supt *J
474
3,684
514
4,497
GIB Supervisor#
448
3,236
488
3,950
CIS Technician
393
2,459
433
3,002
Instructor /Guard i
200,
5.50
243
6.72
Instructor /Guard I1
743
6.72
283
8.20
Integrated Waste Coordinator*
496
4,1.11
536
5,019
Inventory Specialist Equip /Mat T
344
1,926
384
2,351
Junior Engineer
411
2,690
451
3,284
Junior Engineering Aide
361
2,1197
401
2,560
Liodscape Designer#
426
2,899
466
3,540
Load Maintenance Worker 2/
378
2,282
418
2,786
7q
Resolution No. 92-
Page 3
8o
Control
Minimum
Point
Class Title
Steo
Amount
Step
Amount
Lead Mechanic 2/
402
2,572
442
3,140
Maint Supervisor# 21
434
3,017
474
3,584
Main: Tech
243
6.72
283
8.20
Maint Worker 2/
340
1,888
380
2,305
Management Aioe
389
2,411
429
2,943
Management Analyst I0
419
2,800
459
3,418
Management Analyst II4
448
3,236
488
3,950
Mechanic 2/
387
2,387
427
2,914
Mechanic's Assistant 2/
340
1,888
380
2,305
Microcomputer Specialist
393
2,459
433
3,002
Office Services Clerk
307
1,602
347
1,955
Office Specialist I
287
1,450
327
1,770
Office Specialist 11 1/
307
1,602
347
1,955
Park Construction /Acquist Supv#
464
3,505
504
4,278
Park Planning /Oev Supt*
481
3,815
521
4,657
Park /Lands. Maint Supt* 21
474
3,684
514
4,497
Personnel Analyst 1#
393
2,459
433
3,002
Personnel Analyst 11#
448
3,236
488
3,950
Personnel Clerk
335
1,842
375
2,248
Personnel /Risk Manager*
494
4,070
534
4,969
Plan Check Coordinator*
476
3,721
516
4,542
Planning Aide
283
8.20
323
10.01
Planning Commission Secy#
378
2,282
418
2,786
Planning Technician
369
2,182
409
2,664
Plans Examiner#
430
2,958
470
3,611
Plans Examiner - Grading# 2/
430
2,958
470
3,611
Plumbing /Mechanical Specialist8
430
2,958
470
3,611
Police Clerk **
313
1,650
353
2,015
Pool Manager
292
8.57
332
10.47
Principal Planner*
498
4,152
538
5,069
Principal Plans Examiner#
456
3,367
496
4,111
Programmer /,Analyst#
446
3,204
486
3,911
Public Service Technician
361
2,097
401
2,560
Public Works Engineer* 21
496
4,111
536
5,019
Public Works Inspector 1 21
393
2,459
433
3,002
Public Works Inspector II
413
2,717
453
3,317
Public Works Maint Mgr* 2/
504
4,278
544
5,223
Purchasing Agent"
419
3,777
519
4,611
Receptionist
297
1,524
337
1,860
Records Clerk
307
1,602
347
1,955
Records Manager /City Clerk*
504
4,278
544
5,223
Recreation Aide
164
4.53
204
5.53
Recreation Assistant
203
5.50
243
6.72
Recreation Coordinator
387
2,387
427
2,914
Recreation Leader
253
7.06
293
8.62
Recreation Superintendent*
492
4,030
532
4,919
Recreation Supervisor#
417
2,772
457
3,384
Redevelopment Analyst#
438
3,078
478
3,758
8o
Resolution No. 9 ?-
Page 4
* *This cla s sification. when assigned to shifts other than day shift
shall have an additional pay of 40 cents per hour.
1/ When actinq as Clerk to Council /Commissions S50 paid pe' night
or weekend day meeting.
2/ Up to 5150 provided annually toward purchase of approved safety
Tootware.
= Denotes �upervisorviProfessional class
* oenotns Management, Class
Denotes Executive class
Exer,ntjve Manaqement nmpin.yees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no
1psc than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than
15% (30 salary rode steps) apove the control point. All other employees will
he assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% (40 salary code steps)
he,low the. control point and no more than 5% (10 salary code steps) above the
control print. Actual salary within the range is determined by performance,
achievement of gnals and nh,jectives, or for recent appointments, growth within
the position.
50,
Control
Minimum
Point
Class Title
Step
Amount
Step
Amount
Redevelopment Manager+
533
4,944
573
6,036
Rehab Specialist# 2r
430
2,958
470
3,611
Resource Services Supv4
448
3,236
438
3,950
Risk Management Analyst4
419
2,800
459
3,418
Secretary 1/
340
1,888
380
2,305
Signal & Lighting Tech 2!
413
2,786
458
3,401
Special Districts Superva
448
3,236
488
3,950
Special Districts Tech
380
2,305
420
2,814
Special Districts Tech 11
400
:,547
440
3,109
Sr Account Tech
380
2,305
420
2,814
Sr Accountant4
448
3,236
488
3,950
Sr Administrative Secy 1/
378
2,282
418
2,796
Sr Business license Tech
379
2,294
419
2,800
Sr Civil Engigeer*
506
4,321
546
5,275
Sr GIS Technician
413
2,717
453
3,311
Sr Maintenance Worker 2/
350
1,985
390
2,423
Sr planner*
478
3,758
518
4,588
Sr Plans Examiner -Bldg*
450
3,268
490
3,990
Sr Plans Examiner -Fire-4
450
3,268
490
3,990
Sr Records Clerk
317
1,684
357
2,055
s. ^dc' clop,•; - lys'L*
468
3,575
508
4,364
St /Store CrainMaint Suot *2/
474
3,684
514
4,497
Structural Specialist# 2/ -
430
2,958
470
3,611
Supery Animal Cntrl Officer#
383
2,340
423
2,856
Supery Public Works Inso# 21
443
3,156
483
3,853
Systems Analyst#
665
3,522
505
4,300
Technician
364
2,128
404
2,590
Traffic Engineer*
511
4,430
551
5,408
* *This cla s sification. when assigned to shifts other than day shift
shall have an additional pay of 40 cents per hour.
1/ When actinq as Clerk to Council /Commissions S50 paid pe' night
or weekend day meeting.
2/ Up to 5150 provided annually toward purchase of approved safety
Tootware.
= Denotes �upervisorviProfessional class
* oenotns Management, Class
Denotes Executive class
Exer,ntjve Manaqement nmpin.yees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no
1psc than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than
15% (30 salary rode steps) apove the control point. All other employees will
he assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% (40 salary code steps)
he,low the. control point and no more than 5% (10 salary code steps) above the
control print. Actual salary within the range is determined by performance,
achievement of gnals and nh,jectives, or for recent appointments, growth within
the position.
50,
Resolution No. 92-
page 5
SECTION 3: Three tiered Managemert grogram
Employees designated as either Professional /Supervisory, Management,
or Executive Management are not eligible fur overtime pay, or compensatory
ti -ne for working hours over and above the normal daily work schedule.
Employees so designated shall be entitled to all benefits provided to general
employees and the following:
Supervisory/Professional
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of fifty hours per
calendar year. Days off must be approved by appropriate
supervisor, after successful completion of six months
service within this classification.
B. Life insurance policy of an additional twenty thousand
dollars.
.. Deferred compensat on Program of two percent of salary,
Management
A. Administrative ea a to a maximum of seventy five hours
per calendar .,'ai. Days off must be approved by
appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six
months service within this classification.
6, Life insurance pol uy of an additional twenty thousand
dollars.
C. Deferred compensetlo, prc�ram .r four percent of salary,
Executive Management
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of one hundred hours per
calendar year, Days off must be approved by appropriate
supervisor, after successful completion of six months
service within this classification.
S. Automobile allowance of $250.00 per month if a City
vnhie;e is not provided,
C. Life insurance policy of an additional thirty thousand
dollars.
D. Deferred compensation program of six percent of salary.
SECTION 4: Life Insurance
The City provides 530,000 base coverage of life insurance for all
employees. Employees who want to purchase additional life insurance coverage
with personal funds ma
,y do so at the city's group rate.
SECTION 5: Health Insurance
The City provides health insurance plans available to all full time
continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to
average the cost of medical esurance for emplo,, as one group, providing
for no additional payment by employees for cov,,agn '.nrough June 30, 1993.
92
Resolution No. 92-
Page 6
SECTION 6: Dental Insurance
The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full -time
continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to
average the cost of dental insurance for all full time continuous salaried
employees and elected officials up to a maximum of 555.00 per employee or
elected official Per month to be effective July 1, 1992,
SECTION 7: Optical insurance
The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full -time
continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to
average the cost of optical insurance for all full time continuous salaried
employees and elected officials up to a maximum of $19.00 Per employee or
elected official per month to be effective July 1, 1992.
SECTION 8: Holiday
The City Offices shall observe the following 14 holidays. All full
time continuous salaried employees shall be compensated at their regular rate
for these days.
(11 January 1 - New Years Day
2) January 13 - Martin Luther King's Sirthday.
4�February 15 - President's Day
May 31 - Memorial Day
�5� lul 4 - Independence Day
f6} September 5 - Labor Day - The first Monday in September
�71 November 11 - Veteran's Day
8 November - "hanksgivinq Day
9 November - The day following Thanksgiving
10 Decer her - The day preceding Christmas
((l1 December 25 - Christmas Day
(12, Three discretionary days may be taken by an employee at
his/her convenience who has successfully completed probation
subject to approval of the department head. Days may not be
carried over from one calendar year to next.
Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be
observed as a holiday. Whenever a holiday fails on a Friday or Saturdav, the
preceding Thursday shall be observed as the holiday.
When a he ida combination occurs (Thanksgiving Christmas etc
where two consecutive days are holidays and it would result in the City Hal
hain9 open to serve the public only 2 days during the week, only one of the
holidays will be observed and the ether holi ay will become a floating
holiday. For exanp le, for Thanksgiving, Thursday will be observed as the
regular holiday, hawever Friday will become a floating holiday to be used at a
later date. in the instance of Thanksgiving, Christmas, or New Years,
employees will have until March 31 of the next calendar year to use those
f loatin holidays accrued between Thanksgiving and New Years. Also those days
will nnl accr,Ae as floating holidays until the actual holiday has occured.
Fach year the t�.ity will designate which days will be observed and which are
floating holidays.
For fiscal year 92 -93 floating holidays will be provided for the day
following Thanksyiving and Christmas Oay.
e
Resolution No. 92-
Page 7
SECTION 9: Holiday Time
The City agrees that employees who are assigned to work on a holiday,
whether or not their regular shift assignment requires they work that day, are
eligible for pay at time and one -half for working that day. This time and
one -half may be taken as compensation or put in a compensatory time off bank,
fin effect, compensating at double time and one - half). That rate of
compensation is tallied as follows: the ten hours compensation for the
holiday, Plus compensation at time and one -half for the hours actually work.
This payment at time and one -half abrogates the employees right to that
holiday.
SECTION 10: Premium Holiday Compensation
Ma`ntenance employees required as part of the regular work assignment
to work on Christmas Day, New Years Day, Independence Day or Thanksgiving Day,
are allowed to observe the holiday on another day. Additionally, these
employees who work on the aforementioned designated holidays may select to
receive compensation on that holiday at time and one -half for the ten hour
shift, or take a second holiday as time off at a later date.
SECTION 11: Vacation
All full -time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue
working hours of vacation monthly according to the following schedule:
Length of Service
Hours Accrued
Annual Hours
in Years
Per Pay Period
Accrued
1
3.077
80
?.461
90
3
3.846
100
4
4.230
110
5
4.615
120
6 -8
5.000
130
9
5.384
140
10
5.769
ISO
11 -13
6.153
160
14
6.538
170
15a
6.923
180
SECTION 12: Sick
Leave
All full -time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120
hours of sick leave annually.
SECTTON 13: Sick Leave Buyback
Employees who terminate their city employment after five years of
continuous service and have at least 50T of five years' sick leave accrued on
the hooks upon termination can sell 120 hours back to the City.
FIN
EM
Resolution No. 92-
Page 8
SECTION Id: Personal Leave
Employees can use is to 20 hours of accrued sick leave as personal
leave. This 20 hours can be used incrementally (i ,e., 1 hour, 1/2 hour)
throughout the fiscal year. use of this time is for emergency situations
Supervise the using this ame. Lion and needs to be cleared with their
Supervisor rviscr when using this time.
.SECTION 15: Maternity /Paternity Leave without pay
Employees are granted up to Four months maternity,'pa to rnity leave for
the birth or adoption of a child. Employees on a maternity /paternity leave of
absence without pay will be rasponsible for the payment of medical, dental and
optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence.
SECTION 16: Paternity Leave with '>ay
,Male employees are granted up to 2 days paternity leave with pay for
the birth or adoption of a child. Any paid time required beyond this initial
2 days must be charged to sick leave, vacation, compensatory or floating
holiday time.
SECTION 17: Bereavement Leave
Employees granted up to five (5) bereavement, !pave days with pay.
SECTION 18: Military Leavo
Employees required to serve military leave will he compensated
pursuant to the Military and Veterans Code• To qualify for compensation the
nil itary criers must be submitted to the supervisor prior to their tour of
duty and must be attached to thin, timecard for that pay period.
SECTION 19: Standby Pay
Employees required to be on standby shall be compensated at the rate
of $128 Per week.
SECTION 20: Overtime - Maintanance
The City agrees that employees who are sent home to rest and to he.
available to work additional hours as a result of a storm or impending
emergency situation and are not subsequently recalled to work, will be
r,ompersated for the hours not worked in that shift, due to them having been
sent home, to hring the total hours to 10 worked in that shift.
Employees who are subsequently recalled to work the storm or
emergency situation will work no more than 12 consecutive hours. Any hours
worked in excess of 10 in that 12 hour shift will be paid at time and one -
half, regardless of the total numbprs of compensated hours for that work week,
SLLIION 21: Safety Footwear
The City will provido up to $150 annually toward the purchase of
safety footwear for employees required to wear safety footwear as part of
their job responsibilities.
Bs
Resolution No. 92-
Page 9
SECTION 22: Confidential Employees
Confidential employees are designated as such when an employee in the
course of his or her duties, has access to information relating to the City's
administration of employer- employee relations. Employees designated as
confidential employees may not act as representatives of employee organiz-
ations which represent other employees of the City. The employees designated
as confidential employees are as follows:
Personnel Analyst
Personnel Clerk
Benefits Technician
Account Technician - Payroll
Office Specialist 1I
Secretary
Planning Commission Secretary
Admin Secretary
Sr .Admin Secretary
Executive Assistant
Asst Deputy City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
Records Manager /City Clerk
Records Clerk
Risk Management Analyst
SECTION 23: August 3, 1992 Implementation
Items in this resolution that are changed as a result of the 4/10
program being implemented effective August 3, 1992, will not be effective
until August 3, 1992 (ie., vacation accrual, management leave, etc.)
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 30th day of June, 1992.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
ATTESr:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 30th day
of June, 1992.
Executed this Ist day of July, 1992 . at Rancho Cucamonga, California
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
r,2
Resolution No. 92-
Page 10
SCHEDULE 7 -- SALARY CODE TABIIE
BASIC PAY SCHEDULE IN HOURLY, 01--WEEKLY AND MONTHLY AMOUNTS
ONE HALF PERCENT BETWFEN RANGES
MONTHLY AMOUNTS ROUNDED TO NEAREST '001-1.4R
R an99e
17umb er
Hourly
Rate
�9i -�n'eekl
aR to
Monthly -'
to
Range
Hourly
B. -W �_ekly
Monthly
ail
Number
Rate
Rate
Rare
151.
1152.
4. ?439
4. 2651
339.5134
341.2109
736
of
i,..
5.1809
414.4760
898
153.
4.2965
342.9170
739
743
192.
193.
5.2069
416.5483
903
154.
4.3079
344.6316
747
194.
5.2329
418.6311
907
i 55.
4.3294
346.3547
750
195.
5.2591
5.2853
420.7242
422.8279
912
156.
157.
4,3511
348.0865
754
196,
5.3118
424.9420
916
921,
158.
4.3728
4.3947
349.8269
351.5761
758
762
197.
5.3383
427.0667
925
159.
4.4167
353.3340
766
198.
199.
5.3650
5.3919
429.2020
431.3481
930
935
160.
4.4388
355.1006
769
200.
5.4188
433.5048
939
161.
162.
4,4620
356.8761
773
201.
5.4459
435.6723
944
163.
4,4833
4.5057
358.6605
360.4538
777
781
202.
5.4731
437.8507
949
164.
4.5282
362.2561
785
203.
204.
5.5005
5.5280
440.0399
442.2401
953
958
165,
165.
4.5508
4.5736
364.0674
365.8877
799
793
205.
5.5556
444.4513
963
167.
4.5965
367.7171
797
?06.
207.
5.5834
5.6113
446.6736
448.9070
968
168.
4.6194
369.5557
801
208.
5.6394
451.1515
973
977
160.
170,
4.6425
4.6658
371.4035
805
209.
5.6676
453.4073
982
373.2605
809
210.
5.6959
455.6743
987
171.
172.
4.7891
4.7125
375.1268
377.0025
813
817
211.
5.7244
457.9527
992
173.
4.7361
378.8875
821
212.
213.
5.7530
5.7818
4660.2424
462,5436
997
1002
174,
175.
4.7598
4.7836
380.7819
382.6858
825
214.
5.8107
464.8564
1007
176.
4.8075
384.5992
829
833
215.
5.8398
467.1806
1012
177,
4.8315
386.5222
837
216.
217.
5.8690
5.8983
469.5165
471.8641
1017
1022
178.
179.
4.8557
418800
388.4546
390.3971
842
218.
5.9278
474.2234
1027
180.
4.9044
,392.3491
846
850,
219,
220.
5.9574
476.5946
1033
5.9872
478.9775
1038
781.
182.
4.9289
39A.3109
854
221.
6.0179
481.3724
1043
183.
4.9535
4.9783
.396.2824
398.2638
859
863
222.
6.0472
483.7793
1048
184.
5.0032
400.2551
867
223.
224.
6.0775
6.1079
486.1982
1053
185.
186.
5.0232
402.2564
872
225.
6.1384
488.6292
491.0723
1059
1064
187.
5.0533
5.0786
404.2677
406.2890
876
890
226.
6.1691
493.5277
1069
188.
5,1040
408.3205
885
227.
228.
6.1999
495.9953
1075
189,
511295
410.362.1
889
229.
6.2309
6.2521
498.4753
500.9677
1080
7085
190.
5.155?
412.4139
894
230,
6.2934
503.4725
1091
I.
Resolution No. 92-
Page '1
Rang9e
'iour'.y
8i- Weekly
Monthly
Ran a
I url
3i -Weekly
Monthly
u`r er
R�
Ra> e
Rate_
Numer
Rate
11-ate
aR to
231.
6.3249
505.9899
1096
281,
8.1162
648.2993
1407
232.
6.3565
508.5198
1102
282.
8.1568
652.5458
1414
233.
6.3833
511.0624
'1107
283.
8,1976
655.8085
1421
234,
5.4202
513.6177
1113
284.
8.2386
659.0875
1428
235.
6.4523
516.1858
i118
285.
8.2798
662.3330
1435
236.
6.4846
518.7667
1124
286,
8.3212
665.6949
1442
237.
6.5170
52i.3506
130
287.
8.3628
669.0234
1450
238.
6.5496
523.9674
1_35
288.
8.4046
672.3685
1457
239.
6.5823
526.5872
1141
289.
8.4466
675.7303
1464
240.
6.6153
529.2202
1147
290.
8.4889
679.1090
1471
?41,
6.6433
531.8663
1152
291.
8.5313
682.5045
1479
?42.
6.6816
534,5255
1158
292.
8.5740
685.9170
1486
243.
6.7150
537,1982
1164
293,
8.6168
689.3466
1494
?44.
6.7486
539.8842
1170
294.
8.6599
692.7933
1501
245,
6.7823
542.5836
1176
295,
8.7032
696,2573
1509
246.
6.8162
545.2965
1181
296.
8.7467
699.7386
1516
247.
6.8503
548,0230
1187
297.
8.7905
703.2373
1524
24B.
6.8845
550.7631
1193
298.
8.8344
706.7535
1531
249.
6.9190
553.5170
1199
299.
8.8786
710.2872
1539
250.
6.9536
556.2845
1205
300.
8.9230
713.8387
1547
251.
6.9883
559.0660
1211
301.
8.9676
717.4079
1554
252.
7.0233
561.8613
1217
302.
9.0124
720.9949
1562
253.
7.0584
564.6706
1223
303.
9.0575
724.5999
1570
254.
7.0937
567.4940
1230
304,
9.1028
728.2229
1578
95°
7.1291
570.3314
1236
305.
9.1483
731.8640
1586
250.
7.16aB
573.1831
1242
306.
9.1940
735.5233
1594
257.
7.2006
576.0490
1248
307,
9.2400
739.2009
1602
258.
7.2366
578.9292
1254
308.
9.2862
742.8969
1610
250.
7.2728
581.82339
1261
309.
9.3326
746.6114
161.8
260,
7.3092
584.7330
1267
310.
9.3793
750.3445
1626
26i.
7.3457
587.6567
1273
311.
9.4262
754.0962
1.634
262.
7.3824
590.5950
1280
312,
9,4733
757.8667
1642
263.
7.4193
593.5479
1286
313.
9.57.07
761.6560
1650
264.
7.4564
596.5157
1292
314.
9.5683
765.4643
1659
265.
7.4937
599.4982
1299
315.
9.6161
769.2916
'1667
266.
7,5312
602.4957
1305
316.
9.6642
773.1381
1675
267.
7.5689
605.5082
1312
317.
9.7125
777.0038
1684
268.
7,6067
608.5358
1318
318.
9.7611
780.8888
1692
269.
7.6447
611.5784
1325
319,
9.8099
784.7932
1700
979.
7.6830
614.6363
1332
320.
9,8590
788.7172
1709
271.
7.7214
617.7095
1338
321..
9.9083
792.6608
1717
272.
7.7600
620.7981
1345
3? ?.
9,9578
796.6241
1726
273.
7,7988
623.9021
1352
323.
10.0076
800.6072
1735
274.
7.8378
626.0
916
1359
324.
10.0576
804.6103
1743
275.
7.8770
630.1567
1365
325.
10.1079
808.6333
1752
276.
7.9163
633.3075
1372
326.
10,1585
812.6765
1761
777.
7.9559
636.4740
1379
327.
10.2092
816.7399
1770
278.
7,9957
639.6564
1386
328,
10.2603
820.8236
1778
279.
8.0357
642.8546
1393
329.
10.3116
8 ?4.9277
1787
280,
8.0759
645.0689
1400
330.
10.3632
829.0523
1796
Rm
Resolution No. 92-
Page 112
Ran a
au
Heu r_I
Rate
Si -Weeks
Monthly
Range
Hourly
811 -Weeks
Months
el
aR to
aR,
ui!ummber
i(a�e
Rate
as
331.
10.4150
833.1976
1805
381.
13.3648
1069.1806
2317
332.
10.4670
837.3636
1814
382.
13.4316
1074.5265
2328
333,
1 0.
5194
841.5504
1923
383,
13.4987
:079.8992
2340
334,
10.5720
845.7581
1832
384.
13.5662
1085.2997
2351
335.
10.6248
949.9969
1842
385.
13.6341
1090.7252
2363
336.
10.5780
854.
?369
1851
386.
13.7022
'096.1788
2375
337.
10.7314
858.5080
1.860
387.
13.7707
1101.6597
2387
338.
10.7850
862.8006
1369
388.
13.8396
11107.1680
2399
339.
10.8389
867.1146
1879
389,
13.9088
1112.7038
2411
3340.
10,8931
971.4502
i888
390,
13.9783
1118.2673
2423
34i,
10.9476
875.8074
1898
391.
14,0482
1123.8587
2435
342.
11.0023
8S0,1864
1907
392.
14.1185
1129.4780
2447
343,
11.0573
884.5874
1917
393.
14.1891
1135.1254
2459
344,
1 1.11126
889.0103
1926
394.
14.2600
1140,8010
2472
345,
11.1692
893.4554
1936
395.
14.3313
1146.5050
2484
346.
11,2240
897.9226
1945
396.
14,4030
1152.2375
2497
347,
11,2802
902.4123
1955
397.
14.4750
1157.9987
2509
348.
11.3366
906.9243
1965
398.
14,5474
1163.7887
2522
349.
11,3932
911.4589
1975
399.
14.6201
1169.6076
2534
350.
11.4502
916.0162
1985
400.
14.6932
1175.4557
2547
351.
11.5075
920.5963
1995
401.
14.7667
1181.3329
2560
352.
11.5650
925.1993
2005
402.
14.8405
1187.2396
2572
353.
11.6228
929.8253
2015
403,
14.9147
1193.1758
2585
354.
11.6809
934,4744
2025
404.
14.9893
1199.1417
2598
355.
11,7393
939.1468
203E
405.
15.0642
1205.1374
2611
395.
11,7980
943.8425
204'
406.
15.1395
1211.1631
2624
3S,
ii
AS ��
440
5617
2Cc
4v7.
117.2152
1217.21139
2637
35 °.
1J..
916.7
953.3045
206:
408.
15.2913
1223.3050
2650
359,
11.97'9
958.0711
207A
409,
15.3676
1229.4215
2664
360.
12.0358
96 2.8614
2086
410,
15.4446
1235.5686
2677
361.
12.0959
967.6757
2097
411.
15.5218
1241.7465
2690
362.
12.1564
972..5141
2107
412.
15.5994
1247.9552
2704
363.
12,2172
977.3767
2118
413.
15.6774
1254.1950
2717
364.
12.2783
982.2636
2128
414.
15.7558
1260.4660
2731
365.
12.3397
937.1749
2139
415.
15.8346
1266.7683
2745
366.
12.4014
992.1108
2150
416.
15.9138
1273.1021
2758
367.
12.4631
997.0713
2160
417.
15.9933
1279,4676
2772
368.
12.E257
1002.0567
2171
418.
16.0733
1285.8650
2786
3369.
12.5883
1007.0669
2182
419,
16.1537
1292.2933
2800
370.
12.6513
1017,.1023
2193
420.
16.2344
1 998.7558
2814
371.
12,7145
1017,1628
2204
421.
16.3156
1305,2496
2828
377,
19.
7781
1022.2486
2215
422.
16.3972
1311.7758
2842
373.
12.8420
1027.3598
2226
423.
16.4792
1318.3347
2856
374.
12.9062
1032.4966
2237
424,
16.5616
1 324,9264
2871
375.
12.9707
1037.6591
2249
425.
1611.6444
13311.5510
2885
376.
1.3,0356
1042
8474
2260
426.
16,7276
1338.2087
2899
377.
13.1008
1048.0617
7271
427.
16.8112
1344.8998
2914
378.
13.3663
1053.3020
?282
428.
16.8953
1351.6243
2929
379.
1'1.2321
1058.5685
2294
429.
16.9798
1358.3824
2943
390.
13.2983
1063.861.3
2305
430.
17.0647
1365.1,14.3
2958
.�
Resolution No. 92-
Page 13
Range
4ou r'y
31,- '.Jeek�
'tea --
Monthly
Ra- -rye_
Houriv
81- Weekly
Monthly
!gum er
a
e
Number
Rate
Rate
Rate
431.
17,1500
1372.0002
2973
491.
22,0073
1760,5861
3815
432.
17,2353
1378.8602
2988
482,
2 2. 1174
1769.3890
3834
433.
17.3219
1385.7545
3002
403.
22.2279
1778.2359
3853
434.
17.4085
1392.6833
3017
1484.
22.3391
1787.1271
3872
435.
17.4956
1399.6467
3033
485,
22.4508
1796.0627
3891
436.
17.5831
1406.6449
3048
486.
22.5630
1805.0431
3011
437.
17.6710
1413.6781
3063
467.
22.6759
1814.0683
3930
438.
17.7593
1420.7465
3078
488.
22.7892
1823.1386
3950
439.
17,8431
1427.8503
3094
489.
22.9032
1832.2543
3970
440.
17.9374
1434.9895
3109
490.
23.0177
1841.4156
3990
441.
18.0271
144?.
1645
3125
491,
23.1328
1550.6227
4010
W.
18.1172
'449.3753
31140
492,
23.2484
1859.8758
4030
q43.
'.8.2078
1456.6222
3156
493.
23.3647
1869.1752
4050
444.
18.
?988
1463.9053
3172
494,
23.4815
1878,5210
4070
445.
18.3903
1471.2248
3188
495.
23.5989
1887.91,36
4090
446.
18.4823
1478.5809
3204
496.
23.7169
1897.3532
4111
447.
18.5747
1485.9738
3220
497,
23.8355
1906.8400
4131
443.
18.6577
1493.4037
3236
498.
23.9547
1916.3742
4152
449.
18.7609
1500.8707
3252
499.
24.0745
1925.9560
4173
450.
18.8547
1508.3751
3268
500.
24.1948
1935.5858
4194
451,
13.9490
1515,9169
3284
501.
24.3158
1945.2637
4215
452.
19.0437
1523.4965
3301
502,
24,4374
1954.9901
4236
453,
19.1389
1531.1140
3317
503.
24.5596
1964.7650
4257
454.
19,2346
1533.7696
3334
504,
24.6824
1974.5888
4278
455.
19,3308
1546,4634
3351
505.
24.8058
1984.4618
4300
455.
19.4274
155d.1957
3367
506.
24.9298
1994.3841
4321
r =7
19
5246
TM "
^"'
3384
507.
25.0545
2004.3560
4343
458.
19.6222
1569.7766
3401
508.
25,1797
2014.3778
4364
459.
19,7103
1577.6254
3418
509.
25.3056
2024.4497
4386
460.
19.8119
1585.5136
3435
510.
25.4321
2034.57:9
4408
461.
19.9180
1.593.4411
3452
511,
?5.5593
2044.7448
4430
462.
20.0176
1601.4083
3470
512.
25.6871
2054.9685
4452
463.
20.1177
1609.4154
3487
513.
25,8155
1065.2434
4475
464.
20.2183
;617,4625
3505
514.
25.9446
2075.5696
4497
465.
20.3194
11625.5498
3522
515.
26,0743
2085.9474
4520
'.56,
20.4210
1633,6775
3540
516.
26.2047
2096,5772
4542
4b7,
20,5231
1641.8459
3557
517,
26,3357
2106.8590
4565
468.
20.6257
1650.0551
3575
518,
26.4674
2117..7933
4588
469.
20.7288
1658.3054
3593
519,
26.5998
2127,9803
4611
470.
?0.9325
1666.5969
3611
520,
26.7528
2138.6202
4634
471
20.9366
16'4.9299
3629
521.
26,8664
2149.3133
4657
47?,
?1,0413
1683.3046
3647
522.
27.0008
2160, P'.,51
4680
473.
21.1465
1691.7211
3665
523.
27,1358
2170.8602
4704
474.
71.252'
1700.1797
3684
524.
27.2714
2181,7145
4727
475.
21.3585
1708.6806
3702
525,
27,4078
2192.6230
4751
476.
21.4653
1717.2240
3721
526,
27.5448
2203 -5862
4774
477.
21.5726
1725.8101
3739
527.
27.6826
2214,6041
4798
478.
21.6805
1734.43S1
3758
528.
27.8210
2225.6771,
4822
479.
21,7889
1743.111.4
3777
529.
27.9601
2236,8055
4846
480.
?1.8978
1751.99c9
3796
530,
28.0999
2247,9895
4871
10
Resolution No. 92-
Page 14
Range
Hour I
Bi = -Week I
Mon. thly
Range
Hourly
Bi 'Weekly
Mont
NumSer
Rte
_ ate
Date
Aumm5 er
i?�a .e
Rate
7�, z
531.
28.2404
2259.2295
4895
581.
36.2388
2899.1016
6281
532.
28.3816
2270.5256
4919
582.
36.4200
?913.5971
6313
533.
28.5235
2281.8783
4944
583.
35.6021
2928.1651
6344
534.
28.6661
2293.2876
4969
584,
36.7851
2942.8059
6376
535.
29.8094
2304.7541
4994
585.
36.9690
2957.5199
6408
536.
28,9535
2316.2779
5019
586.
37.1538
2972,3075
6440
537.
9.0982
2327.8592
5044
587.
37.3396
2987,1691
6472
533.
29.2437
2339.4985
5069
588.
37,5263
3002.1049
6505
539.
29.3900
2351.1960
5094
589,
37.7.39
3017.1154
6537
540.
29.5369
2362.9520
5120
590.
37.9025
3032.2010
6570
541.
29.6846
2374,7668
5145
591.
38.0920
3047.3620
6603
542.
29.8330
2386.6406
517'
592.
38.2825
3062.5988
6636
543.
29.9822
2398.5738
5197
593.
38.4739
3077.9118
6669
544.
30.1321
2410.5667
5223
594,
38.6663
3093.3014
6702
545,
30.282'
2422.6195
5249
595.
38.8596
3108.7679
6736
546.
30.4342
2434.7326
5275
596,
39.0539
3124.3117
6769
547,
30.5863
2446.9063
5302
597.
39. 9492
3139.9333
6803
548.
30,7393
2459.1408
5328
598.
39.4454
3155.6330
6837
549.
30.8930
2471.4365
5355
599.
39.6426
3171.4111
6871
550.
31.0474
2483.7937
5382
600.
39.8409
3187.2682
6906
551.
31.2027
2496.2127
5408
601.
40.0401
3203.2045
6941
552.
31.3587
2508.6937
5436
602.
40.2403
3219,2206
6976
553.
31.5155
2521.2372
5463
603.
40.4415
3235.3167
7011
554.
31.6730
2533.8434
5490
604.
40.6437
3251.4932
7046
555.
31.8314
2546.5126
5517
605.
40.8469
3267.7507
7081
556.
31.9906
2559.2452
5545
606.
41,0512.
3294.0895
7117
557.
.32.1505
2572.0414
5573
607,
41.2564
3300.5100
7152
554.
32.3113
2584.9016
5601
608,
41.4627
3317.0125
7188
559.
32.4728
2597.8261
5629
609.
41.6700
3333.5975
7224
560.
32.6352
2610.8152
5657
610.
41.8784
3350.2655
7260
561.
32,7984
2623,8693
5685
611.
42.0878
3367.0168
7296
56 ?.
32.9624
2626 :9886
5713
612.
42.2982
3383.8519
7333
563.
33.1272
2650.1736
5742
613.
42.5097
34 0.7712
7370
564.
33.2928
2663.4245
5771
614.
42.7222
3417.7750
7407
565.
33.4593
2676.7416
5800
615.
42.9358
3434.8639
7444
566.
.33.6266
2690.I25.3
5829
616.
43.1505
3452.0382
7481
567.
33.7947
2703.5759
5858
617.
43.3663
3469.2984
7518
568.
33.9637
2717.0938
5887
618.
43.5831
3486.6449
7556
569.
34.1335
2730.6793
5916
619.
43.8010
3504.0781
7594
570.
34.3042
2744.3327
5946
620.
44.0200
3521.5985
7632
571.
34.4757
2758.0543
5976
621.
44.240
3539.206
7670
572.
34.6481
2771.8446
6006
622.
44.461
3556.902
7709
573.
34.8213
2785.7038
6036
623.
44.683
3574.687
7747
574,
34.9954
2799.6323
6066
624.
44.906
3592.560
7786
575.
35.1704
2813.6305
6096
625.
45.131
3610.523
7825
576.
.35.3462
2827.6987
6127
626.
45.357
.3626.576
7864
577.
35.5230
2841.8371
6157
627.
45.584
3646.719
7903
578.
35.7006
2856.0463
6188
628.
45.812
3664.953
7943
579.
35.8791
2870.3266
6219
620,
46,041
3683.278
7983
580.
36.0535
2884.6782
6250
630.
46,271
3701.694
8023
Q
Resolution No. 92-
Page 15
_R__ann
Number
Hour l.y
Rate
3i- Weekly
Monthly
Rangg�e��
Hourl
Bi -Weekl
Month
Rate
Rate
Nu�er�
a e
mate
631.
46.502
3720.202
8063
671.
56.771
4541,605
9838
632.
46.735
3738.803
8103
672
57.055
4564,313
9887
633,
45.969
3757.497
8144
673.
57.340
4587.135
9936
634.
47.204
3776.284
8184
674.
57.627
4610.071
9986
635.
47.440
3795.165
8225
675.
57.915
4633.121
10,036
636.
47.677
3814.141
8267
676.
58.205
4656.287
10,086
637,
47.915
3833,212
8308
677.
58.496
4679.568
10,137
638.
48.155
3B52.378
8349
678.
58.788
4702,966
10,188
639.
48.396
3871.640
8391
679.
59.082
4726.481
10,239
640,
48.638
3890.998
8433
680.
59.377
4750.113
10,290
641.
48.881
3910.453
8475
681.
59.674
4773.864
10,341
642.
49.125
3930.005
8518
682.
59.972
4797,733
10,393
643.
49.371
3949.655
8560
683.
60.272
4821.722
10,445
644.
49.618
3969.403
8603
684.
60.573
4845.831
10,497
645.
49.866
33989.250
8646
685.
60.876
4870.060
10,550
646.
50.115
4009.196
8689
686.
61.180
4894.410
10,603
647,
50.366
4029.242
8733
687.
61.486
4918.881
10,656
548.
50.618
4049.388
8776
688.
61.793
4943.476
10,709
649.
50.871
4069.635
8820
689.
62.102
4968.193
10,763
650.
51.125
4089.9833
8864
690.
52.413
4993.034
10,815
651.
51.381
4110.433
8908
691.
62.725
5017.999
10,870
652.
51.638
4130.985
8952
692.
63.039
5043.089
10,925
653,
51.896
4151.640
8996
693.
63.354
5068.304
10,979
654.
5 ?.155
4172.400
9040
694,
63.671
5093.646
11,034
655.
52.420
4193.262
9085
695.
63.989
5119.114
11,090
65`11.
52.683
4214.230
9120
696.
64.309
5144.710
11,145
657.
52.943
4235.301
9175
697,
64.631
5170.434
11,201
658.
53.208
4256.478
9220
698.
64.954
5196.286
11,257
659.
53.474
4277.760
9266
699.
65.279
5222.267
11,313
660.
53.741
4299.150
9312
700,
65.605
5248.378
11,370
661.
54.010
43320.646
9359
662.
54,280
4342.249
9406
663.
54.551
4363.906
9453
664,
54.824
4385.780
9500
665.
55.098
4407.709
9548
666.
55.373
4429.748
9596
667.
55.650
4451.897
9644
668.
55.928
4474.156
9692
669.
56.208
4496.527
9740
670.
56.489
4519.010
9789
9Z
-- CITY OF RANCHO C I VAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 30, 1992 ) '�
TO: Mayor and Members of the City- Council
FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager
BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ANNUAL LOAN TRANSACTION BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the repayment and re- borrowing of the j
annual loan between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho i
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency.
BACKGROUND: In order to receive tax increment revenue, the principal
source of redevelopment funding, a Redevelopment Agency must
demonstrate existing debt which will be repaid by the tax Increment
received. For this purpose, when the Project Area was established in
Fiscal Year 1982/83, the City loaned money to the Redevelopment
Agency in order to establish initial debt, as well as to provide monies for
operations. For debt purposes, the City and Agency have continued to
maintain this loan from the City, thus ensuring the Agency's receipt of its
full tax increment revenue.
ANALYSIS: Each Fiscal Year, the Redevelopment Agency repays the loan
to the City, including interest, with tax increment revenues, after paying
all debt on outstanding bonds and agreements,
During Fiscal Year 1991/92, the Redevelopment Agency is able to pay to
the City approximately $4,437,636 towards the principal and interest on
the City/Agency loan. At the present time, it is necessary for the Agency
to continue a portion of the loan with the City, in order to show sufficient
debt to receive the full amount of tax increment revenue. Therefore,
it is necessary for the City to authorize the Agency to re- borrow the
amount of $3,727,736, This will leave an outstanding loan balance of
$9,107,794.
Respectfully submitted,
A, AJ4
Linda D. Daniels
Deputy City Manager
— ----
- - - --- - --- - -- CITY OF RANCHO (AVAAI0NGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 30, 1992
'..l
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Susan M. Neely, Finance Officer
SUBJECT:
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET AND ARTICLE XIIIB i
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93
1. Council approve the attached Resolution adopting the 1992 -93
Fiscal Year Budget.
2. Council approve the attached Resolution adopting the Article
XIIIB Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 1992 -93.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has proposed a one year Program
of Service with the 1992 -93 Fiscal Year Budget as the upcoming
"operational" budget. The attached resolution adopts that one
year budget.
Capital and
general Fund Spacial funds TOTAL
Fiscal Year 1992/93: $ 26,140,970 $ 29,145,960 $55,286,930
2. The State of California Constitution, Article XIIIB, requires
that an appropriations limit be established annually by the
City Council. The factor used to develop the appropriations
limit is the C.P.I. change, and change in City population.
The additional attached resolution adopts the annual
appropriation limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State
Constitution. Based upon the factors of the Gann Limit C.P.I.
calculation of (.64)4 and a population change of 5.194, the
City's fiscal year 1992 -93 limit is $20,904,828. The City's
fiscal year 1992 -93 budgeted appropriations subject to this
limit total $14,969,820 which means that the City expects to
be at 71.614 of its Gann Limit at the conclusion of fiscal
year 1992 -93.
Respectfully submitted,
Susan M. Neely
Finance Officer
smn:wp:budresol
1992/93
GANN INITIATIVE
APPROPRIATION LIMITS
I. Base Appropriation Limit
Total Appropriations (1978 -79 Rev. Budget)
5,790,989
Encumbrance Reserves (audit report)
422,841
Less approp, not subject to limit
(1,950,709)
Less Non — Proceeds of taxes
(1,062,340)
Add Excess Fees Cost
621,904
Base Appropriation Limit 1978 -79
_3.822,686
II. Cumulative Growth Rates
Cumulative Growth Rates Since 1978 -79 Fiscal Year:
1991-92 42121 %
1992 -93 446.86%
III. Appropriation Limits
3,822,685
3.822,685
x 5.2321
x
5.4686
20a_000�792_= 1990 -91
209048_28 = 1991 -92
Limit
Limit
1991 -92
1992 -93
Projected
Budgeted
Appropriations
57,084,210
47,426,780
Non —Tax Proceeds
._ 43,525,570!
x,096,990
Sub — Total:
13,558,640
14,329,790
Plus Excess Fee Cost
618,350
640,030
APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT
TO LIMIT:
—14 176990_
_ 14989;820
9'i
1992/93
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SCHEDULE TO CATEGORIZE REVENUE
SUBJECT TO GANN INITIATIVE
Note 1: This total was allocated on a ratio as categories beat
to total revenue dot to prior year data not avelai* as
the City incorporated on 11177.
Per Audit
Estimated
Budgeted
Actual Proceeds From Taxes
1978/79
1991192
1992/93
Sales and Use Tax
1,087,787
6,400,000
6,609,320
Cigarette Tax
106,857
80,700
82,000
Peal Property Transfer Tax
136,437
275,000
275,000
Property Tax
203,800
2,718,000
2,933,240
Homeowner's prop, tax relief
0
10,600
10,600
Transient Occupancy Tar
O
5,000
5,150
Admissions Tax
0
10,800
10,800
Unitary Tat
0
60,000
63AM
Motor Vehicle In —Lieu
584,301
3,831,000
4,163,000
Trailer Coach Fees
0
10,000
10,000
Off Highway License Fees
649
11900
2,350
Highway Carriers
5,853
0
0
Alcoholic Beverage Fees
13,476
0
0
Interest Earnings on Tax Proceeds
63,131
155,640
164,730
Revenue tram — Agencies
26,517
0
0
SB 154 Bail —Out funds
214,000
0
0
P% Fund Balance (Note 1)
Used to balance txtdget
_335,131
0
0
Tax Proceeds
2,777.940
13,558,840
14,329,790
Non —Tax Proceeds
3,013,049
43,525,570
33,096,990
Total Revenue
_ 5,790989
57AB4.210
47,428780
Note 1: This total was allocated on a ratio as categories beat
to total revenue dot to prior year data not avelai* as
the City incorporated on 11177.
L Q
RESOLUTION NO. /4 �� v
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE CITY'S
FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a
workshop to review the appropriation requests for the fiscal year
1992 -93, and;
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a public
hearing on the General City Budget, and;
WHEREAS, this public hearing was published in a newspaper
of general circulation and held on June 30, 1992.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve that a special session
assembled this 30th day of June 1992, as follows:
SECTION 1: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93 BUDGET,
The City of Rancho Cucamonga budget for the fiscal year 1992 -93, on
file in the office of the Finance Officer, is hereby aaopted in the
amount of $55,286,930. This budget total includes appropriations
for both the general and other special purpose funds.
SECTION 2: TRANSFERS OF FUND 3 BETWEEN AND /OR WITHIN
APPROPRIATIONS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
may transfer funds between funds or activities set forth in the
budget. The City Manager may transfer funds between appropriations
within an appropriation as set forth in the budget and may transfer
appropriations between activities within any fund.
SECTION 3: TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN FUNDS
Transfers of funds between funds as shown on the Fund Analysis
shall be made as expenditures warrant such transfers.
5l_ON 4: DISBURSEMENTS, The City Manager and the
Finance officer, or the duly designated representative, are hereby
empowered and authorized to disburse funds pursuant to
appropriations provided for in the 1992 -93 budget, and have the
responsibility to establish procedures and to administratively
implement and control the budget on all matters, except direct
expenditures by Council members which require Council approval.
SECTION 5: ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS, The City
Council may amend this budget to add or delete appropriations.
i
i
qa
RESOLUTION NO. ��` - /� I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE
CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992 -93
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the State of California
provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation
of the State and of each local government shall not exceed the
appropriations limit of such entity of government for the prior
year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population
except as other wise provided in said Article XIIIB, and;
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIIIB of the
Constitution of the State of California, the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga deems it to be in the best interests of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish an appropriations limit
for the Fiscal Year 1992 -93, and;
WHEREAS, the Finance Officer of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga has determined that said appropriations limit for the
Fiscal Year 1992 -93 be established in the amount of $20,904,828.
NOW; TNEP.EFORE, '.`.a C.tr Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does hereby resolve that an appropriation limit for the
Fiscal Yoar 1992 -93 pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Constitution
of the State of California be established in the amount of
$20,904,828 and the same is hereby established.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit
herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution
of the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 30th day of June, 1992.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
smn:wp:Y,udresol(4)
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
ql