HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980/12/17 - Agenda Packet0
QTY OF
RANCHO CL)CAM %XA
CITY COUNCIL
AGENLA
December 17, 1980
Tt1 items submitted for the City Council agenda must be in writing. The deadline
for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and third Wednes-
c.•y of each month., The City Clerk's office receives all such items-
i. CALL TO ORDER.
A. Flag Salute.
8, Roll Call: Frost, Mikels Palombo__f, Bridge, and Schlosser.
C. Approval of Minutes: November 18, 1980 and November 19, 1980.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
. a. Thursday, December 18 at 7:00 P.M. -- General Plan Meeting. Lion's
Park Community Center. Advisory Commission will meet with the Planning
Commission for this meeting.
b. Monday, December 22 at 7:00 p.m. -- Planning Commission Meeting. Lions
Park Community Center. This meeting has been rescheduled since the
time for the regular meeting is Christmas Eve.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR. `� q
a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 80 -12 -17 for $560,570.95. 1
b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for R. Michael 3
and Pamela L. McKenna; The Hole in the Wall Deli,
9668 Base Line Road, Off -Sale Beer and Wine.
n,
c. Authorization for City Manager, Assistant City Manager,
Finance Director, Community Services Director, and
Council to attend the Employee Relations Institute,
January 21 -22 in San Francisco.
d, equest t set public he ring for Ja uary 7, 1981 `far
ap al of P ning Commi�'rvn decisiol denying Direc�'e�
Revie 80 38.
30
City Council Agenda -2- December 17, 1980
e. Release of Bonds:
Tract 9440: located on the west side of Hermosa, 500+ feet B
north of Banyan. Owner: Chevron Construction Co.
Performance Bond (landscaping) $42,683.30
Tract 9636: located south of Lemon Avenue and west of Archi
bald Avenue. Owner: Crismar Development Corp.
8
Cash Staking Bond $ 1,500.00
f. Approval of Flood Control Agreement for Deer Creek Bridges. 9
It is recommended that Council approve the agreement between
the City and the San Bernardino County Flood Control district
for the construction of the Deer Creek Bridges, Zone I,
Fiscal Year 80 -81.
g. Parcel Map 3534: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement. 28
It is recommended that Council accept bonds and agreement
for off -site improvements at 8805 Hidden Farms Road.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -112 29
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVE-
MENT SECURITY FOR 8805 HIDDEN FARMS ROAD
(PARCEL MAP 3534).
h. Approval of Parcel Map 5130: It is recommended that Council 40
authorize the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the
subject map. The map consists of three parcels located on
the east side of Amethyst, south of 19th Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -113 41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5130.
i. Agreement Extension Request for Parcel Map 5269: H 8 S 43
Properties, Inc. has requested additional time to com-
plete the improvement on Parcel Map 5269 located east
of Carnelian Street, north of Hillside Road.
j. Acceptance of Tract Map 11461: It is recommended that 53
Council accept the subject tract map located on the north -
side of 19th Street, between Carnelian Street and Beryl.
Owners: Lewis Homes.
•
•
n
CJ
City Council Minutes
-3-
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -114
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
TRACT NUMBER 11461.
k. Cash Assignment Tract 9434: The subject tract developer,
Chevron, has submitted for City acceptance a $5,000 cash
assignment. It is recommended that Council direct the
Finance Director to sign the assignment letter on behalf
of the City, thus accepting said assignment and placing
same on deposit with the City.
December 17, 1980
1. Purchase of Real Property by County Flood Control: The
County Flood Control has declared its intention to purchase
lands for use as flood control right -of -way in Rancho
Cucamonga, Under Section 3775 of the Revenue and Taxation
Code, the City is required to give its approval so that the
property may be purchased.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
56
61
A. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. It is recommended this item be continued 69
for first reading to the January 1, 1981 meeting.
ORDINANCE NO. 28 -8
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AMENDMENT B OF ORDINANCE 28 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA TO BRING THE EXISTING CITY ORDINANCE
INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE LATEST ADOPTED STATE
MAP ACT.
B. AN ORDINANCE RECOGNIZING HISTORIC LANDMARKS. 70
ORDINANCE NO, 128 (first reading) 80
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
ETIWANDA RAILWAY STATION, THE EMERY HOUSE, AND
THE ETIWANDA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH AS SIGNI-
FICANT HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE CITY AND THERE-
FORE DESIGNATING EACH AS A CITY HISTORIC LAND-
MARK,
City Council Agenda -4- December
17, 1980
C. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR
81
DESIGNATION AS CITY POINTS OF HISTORICAL INTEREST.
ORDINANCE NO. 129 (first reading)
90
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING
THE AGGAllOTTI WINERY, SCHOWALTER GROVE
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE, AND THE GEORGE AND
JESSIE JOHNSTON HOME AS SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC
FEATURES OF THE CITY, AND THEREFORE, DESIGNAT-
ING EACH AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST.
0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -02-
91
LESNEY. A change of zone request from R-1-5 single family)
to P.D. (planned development) for 10 acres located on the
northwest corner of Hermosa and Base Line Road, and the
development of a 117 lot townhouse development consisting
of 114 dwelling units. APN 202 - 182 -13.
ORDINANCE NO. 130 (first reading)
124
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
• ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 182 -13 FROM
R -1 -5 TO P.D. FOR 10 ACRES LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOSA AND BASE LINE
ROAD,
E. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AGREEMENTS. A continued item.
125
ORDINANCE NO. 117 -A (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 117 WHICH PROVIDES FOR THE
CONTROL, COLLECTION, AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE.
RESOLUTION N0, 80 -106
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
CHARGES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF
REFUSE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
10
City Council Agenda -5- December 17, 1980
• F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -15: 126
LANDMARK. A change of zone from A- (limited
agricultural) to R -2 (two family residential) for 12
acres located west of Beryl, south of Mignonette.
APN 202- 032 -71.
G
ORDINANCE NO. 131 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 032 -71 FROM A -1
TO R -2 FOR 12 ACRES LOCATED WEST OF BERYL,
SOUTH OF MIGNONETTE.
VACATION OF A PORTION OF CENTER AVENUE. A public hearing _
on the vacation of 6 feet of right -of -way on the east side
of Center Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street.
The vacation has been requested by the Data Design Corp.
136
137
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -89 139
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO
BE VACATED A PORTION OF CENTER AVENUE AS SHOWN
• ON MAP NO. V -008 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CITY
CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
it
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
A. PROJECT ESPERANZA HID -YEAR BUDGET REpUEST. Project
Esperanza is requesting 5,283 to supplement the recrea-
tion and administration portion of their program. Staff
report by Bill Halley.
144
B. PROPOSED SPECIAL STATEWIDE ELECTION OF JUNE 2, 1981 TO 150
DETERMINE THE FATE OF THE PERIPHERAL CANAL. Staff report
by Jim Robinson.
Assemblyman Russ Johnson and Senator Ruben Ayala have
recently introduced legislation (AS-9) calling for a special
statewide election on June 2, 1981 to determine the fate
of the Peripheral Canal. Staff recommends that Council
express its support for AB -9.
City Council Agenda -6- December 17, 1980
• C. EQUESTRIAN /HIKING TRAILS ON FLOOD CONTROL RIGHT -OF -WAY.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution
and direct staff to prepare a letter for the Mayor's
signature to the Board of Supervisors asking for their
cooperation in the use of the Flood Control right -of -ways
for equestrian /hiking trail purposes.
RESOLUTION NO. 80- 115 155
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
EXPRESSING CONCERN AND DESIRE FOR THE USE
OF FLOOD CONTROL RIGHT -OF -WAYS FOR
EQUESTRIAN /HIKING TRAIL PURPOSES.
D. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs.
RESOLUTION NO. 80- 116
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A
MAP SHOWING THE GENERAL NATURE, LOCATION AND
• EXTENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC
WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT IN SHOWING THE PROPOSED
BOUNDARIES OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE
ASSESSED FOR CERTAIN COSTS AND EXPENSES OF
SAID IMPROVEMENT.
RESOLUTION NO. BO- 117
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING
PERSONS TO PERFORM VARIOUS DUTIES FOR SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS.
RESOLUTION NO. 80- 118
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COVERING
PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION AND ORDERING THE
PREPARATION OF A REPORT ON SAID IMPROVEMENT.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -119
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
REPORT UNDER THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTI-
GATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF
1931 ", AND FIXING A DATE OF HEARING THEREOF.
City Council Agenda -7- December 17, 1980
• 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
7. COUNCIL MATTERS.
A. REPORT BY COUNCILMAN MIKELS REGARDING THE JOINT FEASIBILITY
STUDY ON THE FIRE DISTRICT.
8. ADJOURNMENT.
lJ
•
RE67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '
WARR M VEN M V E N D O R N A M E
465C GLENDALE FEDERAL SAVING
9200 WASSERMAN. LAUREN M
4175 FROST. JAMES
•�•t.
OMM DEVEL
ASNT C $A
EMPLOY C
,EOR GE
ANC Y
LAB
TING INC
KEY
EN TAL
GNCO Y
A 5500
LY
F
URBAN MGRS
RDIND SHERI
WATER DIST
BERT INC
ING CO
0
ERO INC
(INS C ASSOCIATES
IAN, MARK
IUAY INN_ PET
_ 10AYWR0 CK GOT INCA SH
HOYT LUMBER CO
=RSOLL ROBERT
4ND PULER SWEEPING
. CITY MGT ASSOC
TIME RECORDER
7R DEVEL CO
COGG SUPPLY CO
G ENGINEFRS L D
NCIKr GEORG�
SE, JOAN
JILLEFSANDERSON =HORN
JEr SALLY
WARRANT
WARR
DATE
NET
100rOCC.00
500.00
5CC.CC
3,486.99
509.24
1,293.67
17.62
7.321.05
1,259.50
7, 053.07
118.87
125.35
'460.CO
28.75-
38. CC-
3,4C6.CC-
1.831.
414.
32.
42.
37.
16.
45.
b.
177.
581.
581.
10. 303.
121.
6, OCC.
179,
7,662.74
54r935.CO
48r 093.17
55.49
292.11
861.46
13,729.78
18.44
163.97
26.6C
1,871.42
250.00
20114.36
44.5C
12.96
2, 500.CC
31.2C
186.08
15,957.37
3.CC
45.00
260.00
252.CO
31.41
R867 CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA
MARR N VEN 0 V E N 0 0 R N A M E
[0 TITUTE
REDN INC
ERT
LA
DIRER GIST
IPING SERV
D CONSTR
C GRAVEL
RESS
E TIN
EPCION
CL SERVICE
ASSOC
ENTER
MLETTER
0 COUNTY
•CNORRMAN
Co
NANCE INC
F EDISON
F GAS CO
PE MGT
ER PNRITER SV
ILL RENTAL
M GXSEWING
ED MAY
AY PRODUCT
L SERVICE
2
MARR
DATE
NET
•
50,595.55
204.79
3,446.63
198.00
163.51
278.64
1.207.76 •
2.00
265.34
9,867.20
8r 163.13
1.398.82
1C0.CO
560.570.95
COPYbe cot da locfrRerurn all oplex
be Net Writ. Above This line —Ter Headquarters Olney Only
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(5)
1. TYPES) OF LICENSE(S)
FILE NO.
department of Alcoholic Beverage Central
FEE NO.
1215 O Street
Sacrament., Calif. 95814 San Barusrdino
OFF SILLB BEER fi HIM
GEOGRAPHICAL
let.'...' ..levy..
CODE 3615
A. undersigned hereby applies for ", ? ^'- ;:,a''t.q
licenses described as fail..,;
^ ;. ''..yta4
^ ' +r
Dote .. .. r
Issued
2. NAIPP OF APPLICANT(S)
Temp. Permit
Applied under Sec. 24044
Effectve Date: 7/1/80
Effective Date:
MCEEHIRL R. Kiehael d faaww.
Pamela L.
3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTIONS)
FEE
LICE
E
EEB
50.00
1LLmT1AIr
26 40
A. Name of Business
The Role in the Hell Deli CT 20
5. Location of Business— Number and Street
9668 Baseline Avenue
—
City and Zip Code County
,rancho Cucamonga 91701 —San Bernard
CEIPT NO. 90560 TOTAL
S
76_4O
o. m mamas, ucensea, -- -- - - -- -- r core I'l l...e ;Islay,
Show Type of License 20- 30316' On 12/31/80 City Limits? ygg
8. Moiling Address (if di Ifs rent from 5)— Number and Street ff.mp)V..m)
6 ^86 Philips Hay, Rancho Cucamong8, CA 91701 Pere 9, Have you ever been convicted of a felony? 10. Have you ever violated any of the previsions of the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Act or regOnlions of the Department pen
raining to the Act?
11. Explain o "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application.
12. Applicant agrees (o) that any manager employed in on -sale licensed premises will have fill the qualifications of a licensee, and
(b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic 0everage Control Act
13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of ...SA9 BP,RNAFWIHO Dale 11/28180...... ......
under aural, al urr. «m ., n ehal Poe aan� .n c, and son: ly x. s In. aepli,a . a the npplira
elhe al rhe a r,I— cord i 16. to,... opplu dial, ahoy ud r mote Inn appl<min , b.hal: ft. Ill., b. So, and the Ica .
pain, .,pare old nrP. alh.` ma eel and Iha; eth and all of IM Iher mart. an(lil that n pun alb, 11.1 Its PulNu
epelimnb M1m n r disc i. indlva Polkanr, o epplimmi IN--, ro an <andurmd undo It. lines) far vMd Ihi, oppGmrion coed.:
.1 dl Iha I ml., aPpamlmn a ayes �l nde�� mmt the p of a Ica, a o lama a aV,tmmr a nd than river, 190)
..d,. ah. der .him Ill aphra ,a sled ih In. o.pa. IP . ,.f,h t far mPs e. of r mfe r m
delroudear In'u, a J' of rwminar, 15c lhal IN.nnembr oPPLmtian mm then thdtann'b, .nbv Ill app4mnt e, Ih. hurs.. vll no n,ullinp liability b
It.. omeno.nl, • (� /,����
14. SIGN HERE xn"Wml_ ` ✓. /� /C /�'11,9/1•t. A /`f •��) - ) )rC LAv.- 7.�0�„
1d/ .. .. .
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
1 TATE OF CALIFCDNIA County of .. Dote .. ..
us&, nail, of per."..ach v.nan ,.be. drama. p s h.1ow. I nu,es ands m. nl la. r,....... o ns,., of It. mrpmor. nmmm.
mudw Nn Ill. fereP r raft, app rtmian, dal, — nai,.e mew. his ndw ascluou, a , b.hmf; In manb sham, ; -1.. appamaen 1 .ndw
ell ,M a wind L.n.$) dic,eed 6.1— oM t cola the applicant and�a I lamGon mdunmd an the apps paaon of Phis oPurrIkeian
fell, IIf •...hn heralf, b amoo." br IN. Direct; 01 Ine ah.a 11—hr rammaea or numm.d I —s., i mad. I lisp the pn,mem of o lean a e 1.191,
Ise aou enlbM . than n my days prewhrag the do, a nb;.M1 he l nd.r .,,halm n ,it (drd -ill IN. D.penm.nl a e esin u,sunh e
gdwmu tale l.r ny audits, al muffew Par m defraud er inter. Pvn1.dyer of tremlers; Hl lam 'be uon.let Perei -Pan mr, h r+lMdrvan at., enter IM
gelkeM .r Ave Ikme.e with m mellir, liability to the D.parlmem. -Tl]/ t'
IA Nnmpill of IkaneeP 17. Siena? "(d of Licensee(,) 18, License Number (,)
■MMr
.t■0t
I::: League of California Cities
0300 5
■ow`, Sacramento, California
December. 1980
C.1� 0' „a
WorA iogWher
A N N O U N C I N G . . . . . . . . . ' `r
C�cj1,x�e
THE 15th ANNUAL 7- � _Iap/
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS INSTITUTE (1 n VtQ ja PSA(
JANUA 1981 C'k (9 ld-t" to
Holiday Inn- Golden Gateway, n Francisco
TO: MAYORS, CITY MANAGERS AND CITY CLERKS IN NON- MANAGER CITIES,
PERSONNEL DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEE RELATIONS OFFICERS AND CITY ATTORNEYS
(Please bring this announcement to the attention of Council Members
and Department Heads)
The 1981 Employee Relations Institute has been designed to offer
• to both elected officials and personnel officials important and
timely information necessary to carry out their responsibilities.
A full two days of presentations and discussions, backed up with
printed material, will make this Institute very valuable for local
officials.
Elected officials,particularly those elected in the past year, will
have the opportunity to learn in detail about the critical issues
and procedures of public labor relations and the unique responsi-
bilities of elected officials in that process. You will also learn
about the basic circumstances in which your employee relations will
likely beoccurring during the year ahead, such as the effect of
the state's budget, the new legislature and court cases on local
employee relations. Other sessions will offer information on more
technical aspects of employee relations of which elected officials
should be aware, such as potentially costly issues concerning
affirmative action, retirement programs and binding arbitration.
For personnel officials the Institute will offer an array of
sessions concorned with such important current issues as: building
the management team, handling disability retirements, negotiating
with police groups and discipline and due process.
A detailed outline of the Institute program is attached. To get
the most from this Institute you My find it valuable to attend
as a "team" of both staff and elected officials. PLEASE NOTE THE
• Dr \DLINFS FOR HOTEL. RESERVATIONS AND ADVANCE REGISTRATION.
4
IAWK STREET 9ACRAMENT095614 HOTELCLAREMONT BERMELEY93705 900 WILSHIRE BLVD SUITE 702 LOSANGELES 9001]
0161444 5]90 @151843-3080 1213162 -4934
REGISTR.4TTON
To facilitate the registration process you are encouraeed to register in advance and a*
yelluw registration form is attached for this purpose. Should you wish to register in
advance, please complete the Advance Registration Form and return it with a check or
money order (please no purchase orders) in the so ropriate amount to the LEAGUE OF
CA.L I}YIILN IA CITIES, CONFERENCE REGISTRATION OFFICE, HOTEL CLAREM0NT, BERKELEY, CA 94705.
PO FFLCES.S THE ADVANCE AECISTAATIO,$ PAYMENT OF TP.E AEGIS..- °ATZCN FEE MIST ACCOMPANY THIS
R^i7F1.
At the bottom of the Registration Form is a questionnaire for those who plan to attend
the meeting but do not wish to register in advance. In order for the League to make
appropriate arrangements for this meeting, it is necessary that we have an accurate
estimate of the number of officials who will be attending. .f you expect to attend,
please fill out either the ADVANCE REGISTRATION SECTION ( retun with payment) or the
ATTENDANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION, and return the entire form to the League's Conference
Feetstretion Office NOT LATER THAN JANUARY 9, 1981.
Registration facilities will be available at the meeting ,`.or those not registering in
advance. Registration facilities will scan at 8:00 a.m.. Wednesday, January 21, 1981 in
the Lower Lobby area, Holiday Inn - Golden Gateway.
REGISTRI,TTON 1F1
The following registration fees will apply for the Employee Relations Institute:
C,TY FFICLiL . . . . . ''ES. 0ii
NON -CITY PUBLIC OFFICIALS . . . ,Rr5.0O •
NON-PUBLIC OFFICIALS . . . . . . .S °0.00
These. fens are inclusive of the program syllabus, programmed luncheons and other
conference incidentals.
HQliJ, R£SERVATIMS
Too Hal.i.day Inn Golden Gateway has agreed to hnuse all del.crates and will provide meeting
facilities for the sessions. When making your hotel reservations, please use the brown
HOTEI, RESERVATION FORM attached which includes the. room rptes that will prevail during
the meeting. If you are planning to share A room with another city official, only one
Corm with both names indicated on it should be. sent in.
For those planning to check in Later than 6:00 p.z. a deposit in fhe amount of the first
ninht's rental or a credit card number will he remtir +d tr guarantee your accommodations.
AlI rg.servntions should he received by the hotel not la: ^.r tbaa January 5, 19M. Hotel
resrrlations received after this date will he on a sracc available basis. Hotel reserva-
lien^, ,hould be returned directly to the Holidav Inn io:'en Gateway at the address
Indicated on the fore.
I-PANSMPTAI TON'
'.ho Holidny Inn Colden Catewav is located at 1500 Van Ness Avenue. Free parking is
available for registered guescs. Parking will he of.fa.red nt A maximum rate of $2.25 •
n,r day for those attending the Institute but not staying neernight at the hotel.
Fer.one flying, to San Francisco will he able to take advantage of the airporter bus
arr-iire to the downtown Airlines Terminal at O'Farrell 6 Taylor Streets, which is
approximately one mile from the Holiday Inn-Golden Gateway.
-2- i
1981 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS INSTITIIPE
PRELIMINARY PROGRAM
• WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21
8:00 a.m. REGISTRATION - Lower Lobby Level, Holiday Inn- Golden Gateway
9:30 a.m. OPENING GENERAL SESSION
THE FUTURE ISSUES IN PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
• The Financial Perspective
State Fiscal Resources, Future State Support of Local
Agencies, the Future of the General Economy
• An Assessment of the New Legislature and Labor Relations
Leadership Changes, Comnittee Changes, Legislative
Strategies and Priorities
* Impact of Court Decisions on Employee Relations
Review of Past and Pending Cases, Court Trends,
Suggestions for the Future
• Labor's Outlook on the Future
Economic & Non - economic Issues, Esmployment Picture, Pressures
from the Membership, Priori.tiea for the 801s, Areas for
• Cooperation
12:00 noon GENERAL LUNCHEON
AVOIDING DISASTERS IN RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
1:45 p.m. - 4:45 D•m. CONCURRENT SESSIONS
A. BASIC EMPLOYEE RELATIONS FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS
The Process of Labor Relations in the Public Sector
(An overview of the Myers -Mi Liao-Brown Act and the basic principles
of labor relations, total compensation, agency shop and collective
bargaining)
The Role of the Elected Official and the Labor Relations Process
(Responsibitity to the public and specific constituencies, policy
guidance„ end runs)
The Management Team in Public Sector Labor Relations
(What constitutes the team, why it is needed, how to build and
maintain it)
Impasse, Mediation, Arbitration
•(Explanations, pros and cons, how to prepare and deal with them)
The Anatomy of a Strike
-3-
1:45 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. CONCURRENT SESSION
B. CURRENT ISSUES IN EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
Are Disability Retirements Necessary or Desirable? •
(A discussion of different approaches to dealing with an employee
who becomes disabled)
Promoting Safe Working Places
What PERK Decisions Would Mean to Cities and Counties
Negotiating Productivity - -Fact or Fiction?
5:00 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. GET ACQUAINTED RECEPTION (No Host)
Evening Free
THURSDAY, JANUARY 22
9:00 a.m. GENERAL SESSION
ACTING AFFIRMATIVELY
• Comparable Worth: Panacea or Fiscal and Administrative Nightmare
• How to Avoid Discriminating: Interviewing, Promotion, Selection,
Dismissal
* Discipline, Documentation and Due Process
(Appraising performance, record keeping, building watertight •
cases, acting on the evidence, avoiding backpay awards)
12:15 P.M. GENERAL LUNCHEON
BINDING ARBITRATION OF WAGES, HOURS AND BENEFITS
2:00 p.m. CONCURRENT SESSIONS
A. CURRENT ISSUES IN EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
The Legislative Logjam on Workers Compensation: What it Means to
Local Government
(The private perspective and public effect)
Negotiating With Police Groups: Why are They Affiliating with
National Unions?
B. PREVENTIVE LAW CLINIC: INTERRELATIONSHIPS IN THE WONDERFUL LAND OF OZ
(EF,OC, FEPC, FERO, OSHA, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment
Insurance, Civil Rights)
4:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT
-4- 7
•
0
A
A
�,TV �c o e nv-un rr 11.E �11
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 17, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Consent Calendar, Release of Bond
Tract 9440 - Located on the west side of Hermosa, 500} feet
north of Banyan
OWNER: Chevron Construction Co.
2120 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200
Santa Monica, California
Performance Bond (Landscaping) $42,683.30
The landscaping has been installed in accordance with the
approved plans and it is recommended that the City Council
accept said improvements.
Tract 9636 - Located south of Lemon Avenue and west of
Archibald Avenue
OWNER: Crismar Development Corporation
2120 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200
Santa Monica, California
Cash Staking Bond $1,500.00
Certification from Milt Madole, engineer, indicates that all
final monuments have been set and he has been paid in full.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH: BC: j as
. V
•
J
9
1rn
STAFFVRLPORT
-,DATE: December 17, 1980 F n
U v
TO: City Council and City Manager 1977
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: DEER CREEK BRIDGES Replacement, Betterment and
Common Use Agreement
Attached for Council approval is the "Replacement, Betterment,
and Common Use Agreement" with the Flood Control District
covering the City's portion of the construction of bridges over
Deer Creek.
The proposed betterment was previously approved by the Council
at its May 16, 1979 meeting (see attached memo) and funds are
included in this years budget for the first $100,000.
The cost included in the agreement for the total construction
program have increased from a preliminary estimate of $238,660
to $358,241. This increase is due to inflation, contract
administration cost for Corp of Engineers, and increased unit
costs due to the cost sharing formula required by the Department
of Water Resources.
The agreement includes the following payment schedule:
$100,000 by February 1, 1981
$100,000 by August 1, 1981
$158,241 by December 1, 1981
The remaining provisions to the agreement are identical with
those involved in the Cucamonga Creek construction previously
approved.
With completion of this work the City will have completed these
expenditures.
RECOMMENDATION: In order to Complete the program approved by
the City Council and recommended by the Planning Commission, it
is recommended that the Council approve the Deer Creek Bridges
Replacement, Betterment and Common Use Agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
LOH:bc
Attachments
lI
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMC)RA1DUM
DATE: May 16, 1979
TO: City Council & City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: DEER CREEK BRIDGE DESIGN STANDARDS
At the April 18, 1979 meeting of the City Council, the Engineering Division
presented proposed bridge design standards for betterments to bridges over
Deer Creek. At that time, the Council requested that this matter be referred
to the Advisory Committees for review and recommendation. As a result of this
review, the Advisory Committees endorsed the staff recommendation. A further
review by the Planning Commission was conducted at their April 25, 1979 meet-
ing. At this meeting, the Commission expressed concern that full five foot
sidewalks be provided on the bridges in "North Town ". The Commission thereby
requested that further data be developed on traffic and pedestrian volumes
for this area. After review of this information and future land use potential
for the area, the Commission voted to accept staff recommendation with pro-
vision of full sidewalk improvements at 24th, 25th and 26th Streets. This
would result in 5 foot sider:a 0s on each side of the ^ridge. The estimated
• cost of these improvements would increase total costs by approximately $30,000.
Revised bridge standards are shown on the attached table. Also, attached is Lhe
original staff report submitted to the Council and the Planning Commission minutes
of April 25, 1979.
RECO!VENDAT IOH: It is recommended that Council approve the proposed design
standards as revised by the Planning Commission.
/Respectfully sub »tted,
LL0y 6. HUBBS
City Engineer
LBH:deb
•
0
4 160 S 11.2 ^0
S 20,000 Estiinat
4.5 90 L-6
EST!.'-ATED TOTAL $ 238,660
_ i
32'
33
CUC
O
_
IMPROVE fE ITK PROJECT VIIRS
23'
cn Stre -:
DEER CREEK, CROSSINGS
'.
OETE "; 128FT IO ;I
to anrnar ^_ino
HIDTH
"ad and
AP P P.Oi. 1: if'TE
APBRID
ALO:iABLE
EilEa7
SWIDTHL,f1
PRWIDTHO G70fOiHY. eETTEP.FIEiiT
OF
AREA
COST TO
CITY
621D E
REPLFC
20
64'
64'
:en Avenue
CP,OSSI :G
LEiIG`.H
'w IOTH
to curb
curb to curb
Curb Co curb
current industrial area circulation study
Master Plan
.Revision Per
curb
5'
18.25
730
5 st .000
2a,
940.000
lase! ine :?gad
wD
44' Subs= ructure
94'
`n nvb •._
30'
44' S'
3
250
13,:917
41
5
3 -25
We
32'
Ei.istin9 structure
to remain
792
$ 13,440
rr = " "`'�
36'
32' 5' ea. side
6.0
5 r -ec
3`
3G. 5'
S' ea. side
6.5
208
S 74,560
32'
30'
36'
32'
176
$ 12,320
'
36'
32' 5' ea. side
5.5
itr =a.
31
31
'
1
32
'
31'
36'
32' 2.75
32
32' 2.75'
0
4 160 S 11.2 ^0
S 20,000 Estiinat
4.5 90 L-6
EST!.'-ATED TOTAL $ 238,660
_ i
32'
33
36
>Lr..
aa' 32' 2.75'
23'
cn Stre -:
:.0
OETE "; 128FT IO ;I
to anrnar ^_ino
"ad and
..
'u rner v=_nue
I ;4mn
--
64' 10'
20
64'
64'
:en Avenue
current industrial area circulation study
Master Plan
.Revision Per
NCtential
•
4 160 S 11.2 ^0
S 20,000 Estiinat
4.5 90 L-6
EST!.'-ATED TOTAL $ 238,660
_ i
REPLACEMENT, BETTERMENT AND
' COMMON USE AGREEMENT
• CUCAMONGA CREEK, PHASE VII
Bridge Crossings at Sixth Street, Humboldt Avenue,
24th Street, 25th Street, 26th Street, Haven Avenue
and Baseline at Deer Creek, and Haven Avenue at Hillside
Channel
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
, 1980, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a
municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter
referred to as "CITY ", and SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic of the State of California,
hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT ".
• WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, CITY is owner of or exercises cognizance over certain
rights -of -way and easements for street and highway puruoses for
certain public roads, hereinafter referred to as "ROADWAYS "; and
WHEREAS, the flood water of the Deer Creek and /or Hillside
Channel, hereinafter referred to as "CREEK ", pose a serious threat
to health, life, and private and public properties including said
ROADWAYS; and
WHEREAS, the United States of America by and through the United
States Army Corps of Engineers, hereinafter referred to as "CORPS ",
proposes to construct a flood control facility and appurtenances
thereto, hereinafter referred to as "CHANNEL ", in accordance with
• plans entitled Cucamonga Creek and Deer Creek Channel, hereinafter
A790/05031
'� Page 1 of 8
WHEREAS, DISTRICT is willing to incorporate REPLACEMENTS
and BETTERMENTS into construction; and
WHEREAS, CITY and DISTRICT will mutually benefit by setting •
forth herein the rights and responsibilities of each with the
AREAS OF COMMON USE and with regard to construction and costs of
REPLACEMENTS and BETTERMENTS.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
cnnmr nn, i
CITY SHALL:
1.1 Acknowledge the right of DISTRICT, its successors, per -
mittees, or assigns, to construct, reconstruct, operate, and main-
tain CHANNEL for flood control and water conservation purposes and
for purposes of access under, over, along, and across AREAS OF
Conl,lo,d USE without need for any further permit or. permission from •
CITY; provided, however, that any such use by DISTRICT and /or others
specified herein, shall not endanger, interfere, or conflict with
the use of ROADWAYS by CITY or the traveling public without first
obtaining approval as set forth hereinafter.
1.2 Approve BRIDGE PLANS and plans as set forth in SECTION 20
Paragraph 2.3 of this Agreement.
1.3 Submit to DISTRICT, at least 30 days in advance, plans
for any proposed construction, reconstruction, or maintenance
within AREAS OF COMMON USE which may occupy, endanger, conflict,
or interfere with CHANNEL or its functional operation, and obtain
written approval from the Flood Control Engineer of DISTRICT of
such plans which approval shall not he withheld, provided that the
work contemplated does not or will not, in the opinion of the Flood •
A790/05031
IJ Page 3 of 8
Control Engineer of DISTRICT, unreasonably conflict with, interfere
• with, o, endanger CHANNEL or its functional operation.
1.4 Indemnify the United States of America and the DISTRICT,
their officers, agents, and employees against and hold them free
and ha imless of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind
arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from, acts of omissions
on the part of CITY, its officers, agents, contractors, and employees
in its operation and maintenance of ROADWAYS, and /or in the performance
by CITY of any work within or adjoining AREAS OF COMMON USE.
1.5 Accept full responsibility and cost for any and all recon-
struction, maintenance, or operation of the REPLACEMENTS and BETTER-
MENTS subsequent to transfer thereof to CITY, including that portion
of street bridges lying above the plane of the soffit of the deck
structure, and including roadway approaches, parapets, walkways,
• and railing. Transfer of REPLACEMENTS and BETTERMENTS to CITY by
DISTRICT for operation, maintenance, and responsibility shall be
effective as of the date of final inspection and acceptance by
Ll
authori_ed representatives of CITY and DISTRICT or within ten ;10)
calendar days of final inspection of CHANNEL by CORPS and DISTRICT,
whichever is sooner.
1.5 Upon billing by the DISTRICT, furnish and deposit funds
with DISTRICT equal to the estimated cost of the proposed BETTERMENTS
as follons:
a. $IOO,CCO by February 1, 1981; and
b. SIC0,2C0 by Aunust 1, 1991; and
c. S15!1,211 bllanne by Daremhnr 1, 19f;1.
The cost of CETTER'IEL'TS shall include the desiJn Cost, office
A790/05031
I Page 4 of 8
overhead, construction costs, construction engineering, and other
costs directly attributable to this work incurred by DISTRICT. •
Total estimated cost to the CITY is four hundred and three thousand,
four hundred and fifty dollars ($403,450) as per attached cost break-
down, EXHIBIT B.
1.7 Promptly pay to DISTRICT actual costs in excess of esti-
mated cost of BETTERMENTS as determined by audit in Section 3,
Paragraph 3.2 of this Agreement.
SECTION 2
DISTRICT SHALL:
2.1 Acknowledge the right of CITY, its successors or assigns,
to use AREAS OF COMMON USE in common with the public; to reconstruct,
operate, and maintain public utilities, REPLACEMENTS and BETTERMENTS;
provided, however, that any such use by CITY does not or will not •
occupy, endanger, interfere, or conflict with CHANNEL or its func-
tional operation without first obtaining approval as set forth
hereinbefore.
2.2 Prepare BRIDGE PLANS, and plans as set forth in SECTION 1,
Paragraph 1.3 of this agreement.
2.3 Submit to CITY, BRIDGE PLANS for CHANNEL, REPLACEMENTS and
BETTERMENTS at least thirty (30) days in advance, and plans for any
proposed construction, reconstruction or maintenance within AREAS
OF COMMON USE which may conflict or interfere with public use of
ROADWAYS or endanger the safety of the traveling public, and obtain
written approval from the City Engineer of CITY of such BRIDGE PLANS
or other plans, which approval shall not be withheld, provided that
•
A790/05031
Page 5 of 8
1s
the works contemplated do not or will not, in the opinion of the
• City Engineer of CITY, unreasonably conflict or interfere with the
public use of ROADWAYS or endanger the safety of the traveling public.
2.4 Indemnify CITY, its officers, agents and employees against
and hold them free and harmless of and from all claims and liabilities
of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from
acts or omissions on the part of DISTRICT, its officers, agents, and
employees against and hold them free and harmless of and from all
claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection
with, or resulting from acts or omissions on the part of the DISTRICT,
its officers, agents, contractors, and employees in the construction,
reconstruction, or maintenance of CHANNEL with AREAS OF COMMON USE,
and /or in the performance of any work within AREAS OF COMMON USE.
2.5 Coordinate construction of CHANNEL with CORPS.
• 2.6 (a) Administer contract for construction of bridge
crossings at Fourth Street, Sixth Street, Humboldt Avenue, 24th Street,
25th Street, 26th Street, and Baseline, and Haven Avenue at Hillside
Channel.
2.6 (b) Coordinate construction with CORPS of REPLACEMENTS
and BETTERMENTS of Haven Avenue bridge at Deer Creek herein described
and transfer to the CORPS costs of BETTERMENTS paid herein by CITY
to DISTRICT for that crossing.
2.7 Notify CITY ten (10) days in advance of final inspection
of work encompassed by this Agreement.
2.8 Promptly refund to CITY all funds in excess of actual cost
of BETTERMENTS as determined by audit in SECTION 3, Paragraph 3.2 of
• this Agreement.
A790/05031
Page 6 of 8
SECTION 3
IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND MUTUALLY AGREED: •
3.1 Except as expressly set forth herein, this Agreement shall
not terminate CITY'S or DISTRICT'S rights within AREAS OF COMMON USE.
Both CITY and DISTRICT shall use AREAS OF COMMON USE in such manner
as not to interfere unreasonably with the rights of the other. Nothing
herein contained shall be construed as a release or waiver of any
claim for compensation for damages which CITY or DISTRICT may have or
may hereinafter acquire resulting from the construction of additional
facilities or the alteration of existing facilities by either CITY
or DISTRICT in such manner as to cause unreasonable interference with
the use of AREAS OF COMMON USE by the other party.
3.2 Within sixty (60) days after determination of final account-
ing and reimbursability anal7sis by Department of Wator Resources,
DISTRICT shall present to CITY a statement showing detailed breakdowe
of actual costs involved in the design cost, overhead, and other costs
directly attributed to BETTERMENTS. CITY may audit DISTRICT'S
accounting of BETTERMENT costs and verify DISTRICT'S statement of
BETTERMENT actual costs, which verification will not be unreasonably
withheld should such additional auditing be necessary to clarify or
adjust said statement.
THIS AGREEMENT shall inure to the benefit of and be binding
upon the successors and assigns of both parties.
A A • A
k ♦ A } A
A790/05031
Page 7 of B
17
L
i
•
IN 14ITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their
respective names to be hereunto subscribed and their respective
seals to be hereunto affixed by their respective proper officers
thereunto duly authorized.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Alan K. Marks
County Counsel
County of San Bernardino
ATTEST:
By
Secretary, Board of Supervisors
San Bernardino County
Flood Control District
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By
By
ty
IF
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
By
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
San Bernardino County
Flood Control District
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By
City Attorney
A790/05031
Page 8 of 8
CUCAMONGA CREEK, PHASE VII •
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
COST ESTIMATE FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Betterment to Bridge Structures
1. Sixth Street Bridge
$24,610
Betterment width 4.0'
2. Humbolt Avenue Bridge
$ 5,280
Betterment width 1.0'
3. 24th Street Bridge
$22,700
Betterment width 5.5'
4. 25th Street Bridge
$26,600
Betterment width 5.5'
5. 26th Street Bridge
$24,150 •
Betterment width 6.0'
6. Haven Avenue Bridges
$28,150
Betterment width 6.5'
7. Baseline Bridges
Betterment (north bridge) 13.25'
$79,200
Betterment (south bridge abutments)
$63,000
51 L.F. X $1,235
8. haven Avenue Bridge at Hillside Channel
$ 5,400
Betterment 6.5'
•
EXHIBIT 8
Page 1 of 2
SUPCMRY
•
Bridge be
1. to constructed by Corps of Engineers
Contractor
a. Haven Avenue at Deer Creek
28,150
b. Humboldt Avenue at Deer Creek
5,280
c. 24th Street at Deer Creek
22,700
d. 25th Street at Deer Creek
26,600
e. 26th Street at Deer Creek
24,150
SUBTOTAL
5106,880
l0Y Contingency
10,688
SUBTOTAL
$117,568
20 ", C/E & FCD Engrg
& Overhead
23,514
TOTAL
$141,082
•
2. Bridges to be constructed by Flood Control
District Contractor
a. Sixth Street.
24,610
b. Baseline
(1) North Bridge
79,200
(2) South Bridge Abutments
63,000
c. Haven Avenue at Hillside Channel
5,400
SUBTOTAL
$179,470
lOR Contingency
17,947
SUDTOTAI_
5197,417
10 ": Emli neeri ng &
Overhead
19,742
TOTAL
$217,159
•
3. G RAND TOTAL (Total of Iteris 1 and 2)
$358,241
EXHIBIT B
Page 2 of 2
-4 - - - - --
—SIXTH --
0 669.24" to Turner Ave.
I
57' 57'
1 i
I I 1
I
58' 58'
of Common Use
1" 100
ST. --
o,
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTI4
DEER CREEK FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT,
REVISIONS DWN. BY DATE
AT SIXTH STREET S. G. 5 -23 -80
. f FILE NO.
I III D � it
i I �-n
Area Or l.ommon use -4
a — 24TH - - -- /J - - -- ST
p 647.46' �a Turner Are. p
I� = 100'
4
I
BOLT
—A.T, a S. F. —
D II
—J{ I
56' ! 561
L—
`Q
Area of Common Use
R. R.
8TH_
O
653.76' to Turner Rre. ,
— —ST. --
s.
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
i I I I
REVISIONS OWN. BY DATE
li W. S. G. 1 5 -19-80
57 57 D.P. 1- 500/58a
I EXHIBIT "A2"
1 100,
Z�
6
26TH— -
641,03' t. 7i.,ne, Ave.
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
REVISIONS
DWN. BY DATE
W. S.G. 15-19-80
FILE NO.
D. P. 1-500/59a
EXHIBIT 11 A3 11
Area of Common Use
ST
it
4]
2,
I 'V _3
of
---25TH ST.---
C�
M
CHURCH---- ST..—
100'
3'3' /0/'
M
z
All
I /
Fri ly/
/ s�
a3• o1
Area of Common Use
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
REVISIONS OWN. BY DATE
W. S. G. 15-23-80
FILE NO.
D. P. 1-500/600
F)CHIRIT as 4 1
w
0
I" = loo'
— /554.72' t,
BASELINE
1,
Area of Common Use
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
REVISIONS DWN. BY I DATE
W. S. G. 5 -29 -8
j� D,P. 1- 500/61a
EXHIBIT IAs
w
5'DETaIL 113 100
1
/ I
e :,.,5 h
ncz .v bh P .
b R
H.647 Ac' p400
a i a
o SEE V/ s89.4U5s w ti
,7E7A IL yS / 402.0 e• 2js99. . `'6:✓
gn •yea',]° i
59 >� ;0�' (See D.P 1.500/45)
0
C
4, Scs
REM
I °= 3001
T'
862. 15'
f owe
] 'r
L
112
0 G9Q005
99a �.�oiol2 I
0 s�.
N
4 ' •29'ge.
W g5 61.,1
8 �. 63 j� Ems•
RCCE55 RESLRnED— � '\
na 5., z 3
S89.20'S2'E
44.00'
Detnn "a..
I
I
/
i
M ♦�
-:
i4^ !• j2„
/60.03
Pt n.
4b
y E
REM. IN EASM'T.
–450'L A BUREAU
POWER ANO C 161172
SE Con, Sec. 14
14
5, I— Sec l4 s3ro `
956.63' \
SB9'46'55 "w \ \
CA• PEP\ \ \ 23
yOP ,b
a�1PZg: qcC \ '
0�\ \�
19C \
E
,' /Oa B.24' S69'4n'4�•W
't' � x • 34" 14' 38..
L - 573.95'
"COURSE A'=–� 7. 295. d3'
/ REM
1 6.561 Ass
+ REM qcc
ESS�
i
10.119 Act RESCRVEO
2
n
M
YZ
r
I
c
99b o0
99C
—72. �3
Area
1 200 /
\ 147.0J
U
F Q�
'T
1 13
24
`o
J
1'
D
m
Z Pin. _
92
D m
is j00 U
Im .L
\\ r
a
F '
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
REVISIONS OWN. BY DATE
!�,°ei::' +. <r.I "" W.S.G. 5-24 -78
FILE NO.
,�RCr PAR IIL ,
D.P. 1.500/45a
EXHIBIT IIA611
i z 6TH STREET
0
N N
J
i
4 I
o I
�L 6TH ST.
C- `5.70' 1
I
�L I
50, - -T-[— 5 0 .—'. 1
I
I
I
DETAIL "A"
SCALE
4 Cv "8"
dcg3 °2t'OC°
R = 14 11. 20'
L =1067.71'
SEE D.P. 1-500/48
FOR DETAIL PAR. 108
TODD
(= 'b
�qa
—SCALE I" =300' I/ (1Hr1
—1 SAN BERNARD N COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
REVISIONS DWN. BY DATE
J.A.C. 10-12-78
- -{D.P.I-500 /49A
EXH IN @' '=7AT
J
z
z
m
I
Use-- ......,.. ,,11
4TH /�.,5�.93;_
STREET 1"T 866.70'
SEE DETAIL "A'
Y
, e
o-
w' o
P el
oi.
4 °
:. ar
N'P
6f
D
�N
N
\
L
rI
6
C
,ry
n
,.I
c,
ash
P4
�w
._OT
7G
c/
af�
i7
y
b
\�\s9FC r j
a
o 0
�
r
6
I
ti/•
Jm
U
\6/
00
j4
ti y4 Lot
I
a o RS 34/33
�•
Use-- ......,.. ,,11
4TH /�.,5�.93;_
STREET 1"T 866.70'
J
•
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 17, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement
Mr. John F. Crane IV, has submitted bonds and agreement for the
off -site improvements at 8805 Hidden Farms Road (Parcel Mao 3534,
Parcel 2).
The attached resolution is for the acceptance of the bonds and
agreements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance $2,600.00
Labor 6 Material $1,300.00
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and
accept said agreement and security on behalf of the City.
Respectfully submitted,
��s�ubbm�itt ed,
V
LBH:BK:jaa
Attachments
m
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -112
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 8805
HIDDEN FARMS ROAD.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration and Improvement Agreement executed
on October 27, 1980, by John F. Crane IV as developer, for the improvement
of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located at 8805 Hidden Farms Road.
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in
said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said real property.
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient improvement security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and
said improvement security be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf
• of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
U
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
N
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
i
CITY OF RANCHO CL'C,C10 ::GA
• IMPROMIENT AGREE;;EGI
(Planning Commission Resolution No.
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESE::TS: That this agreerent is made and entered
into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regula-
tions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal cor-
porucion, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and
John Crane
her elan.[er referred to as [ha Developer.
WITNESSETH:
TY_4T, '�?iEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by
the City of, 8805 Hidden Farms Rd in accordance
with the provisions of the report of the Carrmunity Development Director
thereon, and any amendments thereto; locatedon they /8 Hidden Farms Road
E/0 Carnelian (PM 3534, Parcel 2)
and,
• I &I RL15, the City has established certain requirements to be r.•et by said
developer prior to granting the final approval of the development; and
MEREA.S, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security
as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be
equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing
said approval;
fi0'd, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer
as follows:
The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all
improvements described on page 3 hereof within one year
frog the date hereof.
2. The term of this agreement shall be one g year , commencing, on
the dale of execution hereof by the City. This agrvemmrt shall be iu
default on the day fellawin; the last day of the term stipulated, unless
said term has been extended as hereinafter provided.
3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provi-
sions of this agreement, in writing riot less than four weeks prior to
the default late, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity
for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves
the right to review 111e prnyision5 hereof, inclu:!ing construction standards,
ccst eitimnte, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require
a'ju.stawnrs thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein.
4. If the Developer fails ar neglects to comply with the provisions of this
agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provi-
sions to be completed by any law"_�eans, and thereupon to recover from
said Developer and /or his Su rct full cost and expense incurred in so
5. Encroachment permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office
of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right
of way, and tho developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with
the regulations contained therein. Non — compliance may result in stopping
of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. •
6. Public right of wa y improvement work required shall be constructed in
conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications,
and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction
shall include anv transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary
for drainage or public safety.
RCE12A
•
J
Page 2
ULPR0VQlFNT Acer :FMl Nl'
• 7. Wu rk dune within existing{ streets shall he dig igcOLLy pursued to comple-
tion; tile. City shall Inve the right to cnmplcto .v, g and nll work in the
CVCnL of unj us of Led delay in comp l e L inn, and to recover all cost and
expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful
means.
8. The Developer :h.ill be responsible for replarrment, reloeatfon, or ro-
muval of any component of any irrignlion water sy.teri in conflict with
the required wort: to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner
of the water system.
9. The Developer shall Pe responsible for rumoval of all louse rock and other
deln•is from the public right of way resulting from work done on the adja-
cent property or within said right of way.
10. The Developer shalt plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the
Community Development Director.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee
conpletiun of the terms Of this ngreemont shad be subject to the approval
of toe City u
Attrnoy. The principal amount of said improvement security
shall be not less than the amount shown below:
Foi.i.:ul Per fo Cnianu, Soud
. TYPE SURETY/ACLNT PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
$2,600.00
Material and Labor Bond 51,300.00
IN Wf Th LSS HLM1 OF, the parties hereto have caused [hero presents to be duly
executed and icknowlodgcd with all formalities required by law on the dates
set forth apposite their signatures:
DEVI' MER
Ofir tiG DATE: /o - i 41
WIT ;!;S: _ U �N n / '2�iy��9�1.i. DATE:
CITY OF RANfJIU cuf,,1,•ttlscA,
omuet But, e
302
.. .
CI'I -i of RA`(1N') rX(;A:1W;(;A
CONSTRUCTION AND 90ND ESTIMATE
ENCROACHMENT PER)tIT FEE SCHEDULE
(Attach to "Inspector's Copy ")
DATE: 10/20/80 PERMIT NO. COMPUTED BY J. L. Martin •
File Reference 8805 Hidden Farms City Drawing No.s Not yet submitted
NOTE: Does not include current fee for writing permit or pavement replace-
ment deposits.
CONSTRUCT101 COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
QUANTITY
WIT I
UNIT COST
5 AMOUNT
P.C.C. n,irh - a" r. F.
1
T_ F.—
P.C.C. Curti only q" C.F.
1_ F.
A.C. Bern (5J.O0 pin)
1_ F,
4" P.C.C. Si,!ewalk
S. F.
5" nrive Anpronch
S.F.
N" '.C.C. Crass 'lnttcr
S4 F.
Street Excavation
C.Y.
Imported Embankment
("Y.
Preoaratinn of Suherade
S.F.
Pt, -.. 4„ -,,, nn ., n thick)
5.F.
A. C. over 1100 tons)
'ro:
A,C„ (9n0 to 1700 cons)
TON
n r (,.;.,j, Snn rp 9(lq ronsl
TON
-
�'
tii. i'O
'Grp
Patch A.C. rrenrh)
S.F.
'
I" Thick A.C. t *:nrlav
S.F.
\d lust <c,mor C.r. to Crade
EA.
Adl„,t '•gin t,•r Val:, to !:rack
FA.
i
F.1.
<t mn' Si rn<
EA.
S'r"••f Trrrs
EA.
1
PP.TATITllo lb\LLS
1
1.,
i', 1. r'1- :.6[,I ;
.
L.CIIIS ('.Ai'4. I i:Ii IGA'f iU)1
1..6.
•
n
U
Ll
'w
•
1 ac ,a 10. UU
INSPECTION FEES
ITEM
OUANIITY 1UNIT
I
UNIT COS
AN " NT
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION -
of Construction Cost Estimate
L.S.
I,. A.
L. q.
PER`TANE::C PAVEMEM REPLACEMENT
STORE MATERIAL IN RIGHT -OF -WAY
E,1.
I. TOTAL INSPECTION FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,316.00
II. COMPACTION TEST FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$
III. 10' CONTPiGENCIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IV. DESIGN FEES (107. of Total Construction Cost Estimate) . . $
TOTAL . $2,517.00
Faithful Perfomance Bond - $2,600.00 -
Material and Labor Bond = $ 1,330.00
Maintenance Bond = $
Cash Monumenting Deposit = $
RCE22E
3
Bond# L05- 058303
•
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and John F, Crane IV
(hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated October I ; 19 80 and identified as
project 8805 Hidden Farms Rd.
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and Balboa Insurance Company
, as surety, are held and
firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called .
"City "), in the penal sum of two thousand and six hundred
Dollars ( 2,600.00 ) lawful
money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execu-
tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide
by, and well and truly keep and eer,form the covenants, condi-
tions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration
thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be
kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein spec-
ified, and in all respects according to their true intent and
meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers,
agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation
shall became null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in
full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment
rendered.
- 3S
•
•
n
U
•
Ttie ety her, r upuia ana Ana' 1 1". - , � .-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the
agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spec-
ifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its
oblications on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any
such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed
by the principal and surety above named, on October 27
19 BO
John F. Crane IV
RCE27
Balboa Insurance, Company
A.E. Lee Attorney in fact
34
i Bond# L05- 058303
L
LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and John F. Crane IV
(hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated October 14 19 80 , and identified as pro-
ject G Hidden FFa rms Rd.
WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re-
quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file
a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15
(commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the
Civil Code of the State of California.
NOW THEREFORE, said principal and the undersicned as a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho •
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material -
men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid
agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure
in the sum of one thousand and three hundred
Dollars ($1,300.00 for materials
furnishLd or labor thereon of any kind, or for amcants due under
the Unemployment Insurance Ac*_ with respect to such work or labor,
that said sarety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the
amount hereinahove set forth, and also in case suit :s broucht
upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof,
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed
as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and
corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing
with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so
as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit
brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then
this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be
and remain in full force and effect.
•
- 37 4 , _.
r'le
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said
agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in
any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here-
by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or ad-
dition.
• IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed
by tOhe principal and surety above named, on October 27th
John F. Crane IV Balboa Insurance Company
A.E. Lee Attorney in Fact
RCE24
J
n
LJ
3S'
BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY
620 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE, NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 4049
GPA
POWER OF ATTORNEY VALID •
GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY ONLY IF NUMBERED IN RED
Know All Afen by These Presents, That BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation duly organized and existing
under the laws of the State of California, and having its principal office in Newport Beach, Orange County, California, does by
these presents make, constitute and appoint
A.E. LEE
of San Bernardino and State of California its true and lawful Attornev(td in-Fact, with full
power and authority hereby conferred in its name, place end stead, to execute, acknowledge and deliver
and to bind the Company thereby as fully and to the same extent as if Such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the
corporate seal of the Company and duly attested by its Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said
Attornev(s) -im Fact may do in the premises. Said appointment is made under and by authority of the following resoiution adopted
by the Board of Directors of the Balboa Insurance Company at a meeting held on the 22nd day of March, 1962.
"Be It Resnlred. that the President, any Vice President, any Secretary or any Assistant Secretary shall be and Is hereby
vested with full power and authority to appoint any one or more suitable persons as Attorney(s)-m Fact to represent and act for
and on behalf of the Company subjeet to the following provisions'.
•'Seen.... 1. AttonlepnrFacL Attorncy-m Fact may be gisen full power and authority for and in the name of and on •
behalf of the Company'. to execute. acknowledge and deliver, any and all bonds, recognizances, contracts, agreements of mdemm tY
and other conditlanal or ohbeetaty undertakings and any and all nutices and documents canceling or termmaung the Company's
Itahllos thereunder, and any' such instruments sit executed by any such Attorney +m Fact shall be binding upon the Company as if
signed by the President and sealed and attested by the Corporate Secretary"
Balhoa Insurance Company has caused these presents to he signed by its Senior
.iCtJgA its corporate seal to be hereto affixed this_ 7th day of
m� °2j BALBOA IASUR,j7 /G �, CLi ?1P Y
_ B
Incorporated
Fe b. 6, 1948 yam' I
Slate of Cahl'orn'A j
County n( Orange
On this 7th &7� •lulY _, A.D. 19L O., before me personally came
William Pai¢utt to not known, who. being by me duly sworn, did depose and my,
that he resides in -- Mission Vieict ,California that he is
Senior Vice President of BALBOA INSUWWCF. COMPANY, the company described In and which
executed the ahove IT slnlntent. 11111 he knows the seal of said ('rimpany. that the seal alfixed to said instrument Is such corporate
seal, That it was vi atlleed hs order if Iite BnaN of Ouectrirs nl said Compa /nY and That line signed his Fault thereto by like oldeer.
of FICIALSEAL li R�.2-l.
A KIMBERLY A, FORREST Nnrury Aablm
—•`K`
NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA
PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN
ORANGE COUNTY
MY fomml salon Sieves Aug 22, 1963
:F?
7
7
L
,ITV nU n A Nr ( T re NAnvcn
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 17, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 5130
The subject map is submitted by Barrie B. Cohen to divide .6
acres into 3 lots located on the east side of Amethyst Street
1097 + feet south of 19th Street.
Required offsite improvements for Amethyst Street have been
constructed.
It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution
approving Parcel Map 5130 authorizing the City Clerk and City
Engineer to sign the map and forward it to the County Recorder.
Respect /fullytl submitted,
LBH:BK:jaa
Attachments
"! V
. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -113
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5130.
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 5130)
WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 5130, submitted by Harrie
B. Cohen and consisting of 3 parcels, located on southeast Amethyst,
south of 19th Street, being a division of a portion of the south one -
half of the west one -half of Lot 2, Block 8, map of Cucamonga Homestead
Association Land, recorded Book 6, Page 46 records of San Bernardino
County, State of California was approved by the City Engineer of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga; and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 5130 is the final map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 5130 be and
the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to
• present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
41
FO.NA
B rAG
rFNrAr/vf ( RCEL MAP W. 5130
IN THE C ?), OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BEING A SUBO'VISION OFA PORr/OV OF THE SWYH ONE -NALF
OF rHE WEST OVE- H4LFLFLOr2, BLOCK B, CWAMONGA
HO/ESrEAO ASSOOAT/ON LANDS M.B. 6146
N)NETEENTH STREET _ ,/, NB9°44'4l "E
700'
N89 °a 46 E /3A7.06' I FO. NAIL
�Fv CSAL FO. SPIKE
FD.2 1.P
��I��FO. / °/q ... ,...,�
MONTE VISTA STREET
NB9 °5720 "W 1905.65'
GENERAL NFO.RMArION
rHERE IS HOUSE UNDER CONS r. ON PARCEL / OTHERWISE WE
S1rE15 VACANT HAS NO EXIST TREES /S Bp1N0.fO OV rHE NOR rH
BY AN EXIS r AESIO£NCE, ON rNE EAS 1'8r A MOBILE HOAE PARX ANO
ON rHE SOUTH BY ANOrHER SINGLE FAMILY RESDENCE. 41
PRESENT ZONING IS R/ •
PROPOSEO LAND LASE/ CONSr. OF SINGLE FAMKY-RESIDENCES
WLu
iQ
SHEET 2OF2,
state: 1' =60'
FEB. 1980
SURVEYOR
PHIL K. MOSL£Y
1033 E ROSEWOOD Cr
ONTARIO, CA. 91764
(714) 984 4702
O
�
P,
i
FO 2"i
/J
-�JOO �
m
L
h
m
PAR EL
W62 5F) 9
0
1
I
N*9°4C'OO°f 150 ��
N
9/47 SF
$a3
}�r'�L
NB9°40'OO"E / .00'
N
3
b
!9,1661 SF i ,+445
b
yl
15000'
NB9 58-67E 183.00'
I
((ll
I
"L4
b
� �
FO 2
15010
-
12730,
Ill
\ NB9 °58'57 °E /406.07'
��I��FO. / °/q ... ,...,�
MONTE VISTA STREET
NB9 °5720 "W 1905.65'
GENERAL NFO.RMArION
rHERE IS HOUSE UNDER CONS r. ON PARCEL / OTHERWISE WE
S1rE15 VACANT HAS NO EXIST TREES /S Bp1N0.fO OV rHE NOR rH
BY AN EXIS r AESIO£NCE, ON rNE EAS 1'8r A MOBILE HOAE PARX ANO
ON rHE SOUTH BY ANOrHER SINGLE FAMILY RESDENCE. 41
PRESENT ZONING IS R/ •
PROPOSEO LAND LASE/ CONSr. OF SINGLE FAMKY-RESIDENCES
WLu
iQ
SHEET 2OF2,
state: 1' =60'
FEB. 1980
SURVEYOR
PHIL K. MOSL£Y
1033 E ROSEWOOD Cr
ONTARIO, CA. 91764
(714) 984 4702
0
•
•
STAFF R-E, PORT v
DATE: December 17, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Agreement Extension Request for Parcel Map 5269
Due to the adverse economic environment, H s S Properties, Inc.
has requested additional time to complete the improvment on above
subject parcel map located east of Carnelian Street, north of
Hillside Road.
H 6 S Properties, Inc. received final approval and City Council
acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Letter of Credit on
January 16, 1980. The Letter of Credit in the amount of $40,500
expires October 31, 1981, the Improvement Agreement expires on
January 16, 1981.
RECO?LMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a six (6) month
extension of the improvement agreement
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:BK:jaa
Attachments
0
A P?L[CA:,'.
J L, U Ult4 I'LA II'iG
l7htENf
01 S
10,7// '
_ � �r.,. ! - , tern ( ?n /•t n d•d Rc.r (� _ _
t
1�
21
'Ifrr,R'r.,
1�I.V1
I
Soil•
7i & S �zofxztiee, Sire.
1030 NEPTUNE
LEUCADIA CAUPORNA 91034
7141 7519336
November 25, 1980
Mr. Lloyd Hobbs
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Subject: Improvement Agreement (Parcel Map No. 5269)
Dear Mr. Hobbs:
Due to the adverse economic environment that has prevailed during the
past several months, H 6 S Properties, Inc. will need additional time
to complete the improvements described on page 3 of the subject agree-
ment (a copy is included with this letter). Adequate provision for
funds has been made and all improvements will be completed during 1981.
Hs S Properties hereby requests additional time, as outlined in
Item 3 of the agreement, in which to complete the improvements. Your
favorable response to this request will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely, M�[�/ns -.J,
D. V. angler A
DVS: j In
cc: Gary Hooker
Cary Saxe
Wells Fargo Bank
100 South Euclid Avenue
Ontario, Calif. 91761
q a G ors' 2 1J E 0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG,A
COMMUNITY DEVELONMENT DEPT.
h;N 2G 1980
AM PM
7La191bLllL1211L2(3L4L516
Q
•
•
0
CITY OF RANCIIO CWCfJIU1iGA
• IMPRUMENT AGREENEIIT
• (PARCEL 11AP NO. 5269 )
KNOW ALL MEn DY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered
into, in conformance with the provisions of the Punicipal Code and Regulations
of the City of Rancho Cucamonna, State of California, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and
H E S Pro en rties, Inc.
hereinafter referred to as the Developer.
WITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the
City of, Parcel Mao Plumber 5259 in accordance with the
provisions of the report of the City Engineer thereon, and any amendments
thereto; located east of Carnelian Street and north of Hillside Road;'
and,
WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said Dev-
eloper prior to granting the final approval of the parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security
as hereinafter cited, and aocro:ed by the City 1,ttornpy, are ez-nd to be
• equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the pupose of securing
said approval;
•
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer
as follows:
I. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all
improvecents described on Page 3 hereof within twelve months from the
date hrrenf.
2. The term of this agreement shall be twelve months commencing on the date
of execution hereof by the City. This agreement small be in default on
the day following the last day of the term stipulated; unless said term
has been extended as hereinafter provided.
3. Thd Developer may request additional tine in which•to complete the pro-
visions of this agreement, in on-iting not less than four weeks prier to
the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity
for additional titre. In consideration of such request, the City reserves
the rlaht to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards,
cost estirate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require
adjustments thereto when warranted by suhstantial channav thc.cin
t
and tl,e I z t,h^ r^-
C''JIlatiolls T)TT'u 4["j -I— •'j. ''I - r p;) imj of the
work hy tT'�,_ City, and r; f`,', -r IT II IT d
TIZI I
r
n I '- I -A
a
. � ttlreavc;lc;+r nr.Rr.ernrtr
• 7. Work dnnc within oxisting ::trcpt:: shall be dilig' oily pursnod to cmnpin-
t1n1l; Line City ^hall have the ril'•ht Ln runq.loto arc .Inl all work In the
event of ulljusLified dOlny in anopletiOn, and to rveovvr all cost :nd
expense incurred from the Developer mud /Ur his contractor by any LawfoL
means.
R. The Developer shall be responsible fol rcplareMeuL. relocation, or re-
moval of any component of any irrii;alion water syslnm in n.nnfliet with
the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner
of. the water system.
9. The Developer shall he trzpOnsible for rriv.val of n11 tOOSn rock and Other
debris from the public right of gray rurtulting fron work done on the adja-
cent property or within said right of way.
10. The Developer shall plant :md maintain parkway trees ns directed by the '
Community Development Director.
11. The improvement security to he furnished by Lhe Devclnpor to gnnrantoc
completion of the terms Of this ngrcemcnt shall be suhirCt to the approval
of the Citv Attorney. The principal nmonnt of said imptovement security
shall be not less than the amount shown below: .
IKPROVEaJZIT SECURITY SUIi@IITTED: Faithful performance bond
• TYPE SURELY /AGENT PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
$ 40,500.00
Piaterial and Libor Bond $ 40,500.00
IN WITaESS dEREOF, the pnrtios hereto have caused thesr presents to he duly
executed and acknowledged with all formalities required. by law on the dates
set forth opposite their signatures:
6Y
BY
WI
r1
U
V
DATE: ,y Q- gr
DATE: /- 17- o
DATE: /— "Y - 43 y
A0nNS4R't1C7TON A::r M:31, ESTWATE
ENCROACHMENT PEM'IT rEr.
(Attach to "Inspert-r's copy")
DATE: Auclust 20, 1979 PERMIT NO. COMPUTED BY J. L. Martin
File Reference Parcel Man Me. 5269_ City Drawing No.s •
NOTE: Does not include current fee for writing permit or pavement replace-
. ment deposits.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
ITEM 1011AMMY
I
1INTY I
T i I 'r ( ;n !; T
S A!!(111!:T_
CRAT)r. R!C11r OF WAY I
I S. I
q-y.
s
5 op,00
RFMIYVAIA, A.C. 1
3.094 1
1 ... S.
.35
1 022.90
A. C. PAVEMENT
36,854 1
s.F-
.43
15 .847. 22
A. C. BERM
353 1
I..1'-
3.00
1,059.00
CURS & M;M.R
2.209.31
!,.7. f
5.00
1, nag
GROSS GUTTF.. PAIMFEL
833
S.F.
2.40
1.951.20
SIDEWALK
S.F.
I DRIVE AHROACHES - residential
S.F.
CRUSHED MICREGATE BASE
S.F.
STREET T,Tr,!!T.q
F.A.
2" X 4" R!7q�;OOD HE,%DER
T.. F.
STREET SIGNS
3
M
100-00
300.0n
R.C.P.
I.. F.
CATCH BASIN
EA.
OUTLET
�A,
a C.
9 1d7
S.F. 1
.12 1
11-1!84
REFLECTORS
3
EA.
50.00
150.00
LANDSCAPE
0
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $36,742.46 •
A711,
r1
Li
•
INSFECTI01! Tr"
I. TOTAL INSPECTION FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
II. COIL °ACTION TEST FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$
III. 10': Co11TI1;GESCII'.5 C 3,647.25
IV. DESIGN FEES (IOZ of Total Construrtinn Cos[ Eat ii�.'.c) S
TOTAL S will.4T �.1
Faithful Prrfncmanco Bond = $ 40,500.00
tiatcrinl and Lnhor Itond S 40,500.00
Maintenance 5 "I'd = $
Cash Mumlmenting N.Pnsia = $
RCE22E
CONSTEtiCT ION INSPECTION -
Of CC�1c[ni. ^t \n•.l C.n[L f.5[1nnIC
I,.$. IL.$. L.C.
EP E'U'.q ^.I't: !' I'A,I . i
STORE !F.I,;I' ❑: ?i:;il F- ttP -l7,1Y
FA.
I. TOTAL INSPECTION FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
II. COIL °ACTION TEST FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$
III. 10': Co11TI1;GESCII'.5 C 3,647.25
IV. DESIGN FEES (IOZ of Total Construrtinn Cos[ Eat ii�.'.c) S
TOTAL S will.4T �.1
Faithful Prrfncmanco Bond = $ 40,500.00
tiatcrinl and Lnhor Itond S 40,500.00
Maintenance 5 "I'd = $
Cash Mumlmenting N.Pnsia = $
RCE22E
?f & S,aropediee, Sire.
10] NtIWNE
IEOCCP•4 Cnrl1e9111F 9.01.4
nl<I 753 9336
November 25, 1980
Mr. 610 >d Hubbs
City' Engineer
City of Ranchu Cucamonga
P. 0. Sox 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91710
Subject: Improvement Agreement (Parcel Nap No, 5269)
Dear Mr. Hobbs:
Due Co the adverse economic environment that has prevailed during the
nnst :,crnt ^nnths, 11 d S Properties. Inc. will need additional time
CO �.. ��ple,e the :r.1jrJ••C ^,a:ILS .ieszrih:,.: nn p.1 '0 ) of +nCj 1CC .i ieP_
ment'(a c.op7 is included with this letter). Adequate provision for
funds h,iw been Wade and al improvements will be completed during 1981.
H & S Properties herebv regnt•sts additional Lime, as outlined in
Item 3 of the a4ceoment, in which to complete Llle improvements. Your
favorable res ?Dose to this request will be Kreatic appreciated.
Sincerely,
kf2 KA��<�yj
D. V. Spangler `�
0\';S:i In
Cat': Sa::�•
rr_ CI
Ontario, Calif. `lI 7h
�1
Ji..i_'1
C:IL'd:�•�IiY CE`: El fi "NT DEFT.
PM
71$9 111213141-016
Z
•
0
I SAN DE ®1 Fi UINU CUUN F,LA'Uvl.'!G IIEP'.T_4t
4a L '`
- 1 t
5
y'� So3 (y VI u
J
o�� I ,LO. 711 _
AI
i 7 _
(;. ,. d• -,� r, ,. nom. /,a n.id ,Pc,e v� _ _
"'F I
I
u42 , -_'1l
Ac_ I U.
�R
E 4 r
A -.
G�
a
1�
6I
f �opnsed
'nfFi<s
LY
Sui•
0
J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 17, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Accetpance of Tract Map 11461
The subject map was tentatively approved on June 11, 1980 for
the conversion of 248 previously approved apartment units on
15.2 acres of land into condominiums.
The project site is located on the north side of Nineteenth
Street, between Carnelian and Beryl in the R -3 Zone and generally
known as Sunscape II.
All street improvements are existing.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign
the map and forward it to the County Recorder.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH: BK: jas
Attachments
53
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -114
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 11461.
(TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11461)
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map number 11461, submitted by Lewis
Development Company and consisting of 5 lots for Condominium purposes,
located on the north side of 19th Street between Carnelian and Beryl,
being a division of a portion of Lot 12, Block 15, Cucamonga Homestead
Association Lands, as per map recorded in Book 6, Page 46 of maps,
Records of San Bernardino County, State of California was approved by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and,
WHEREAS, Tract Map Number 11461 is the final map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Tract Map Number 11461 be and
the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to
present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
6�4
wfY .-M IL
Sun
ALTA
LEWIS
! I
-roc. Bru
APE APARTM
[A
=CO.
PALETTE
NpIRS
4nM w.
L ffoxdad turf
PHASE R
0
'I_ WIMP _ M 0 01 kel L
DATE: Decadmr 17, 1950
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. imbbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Cash Assignment Tract 9434
Ube subject tract developer (Chevron) has submitted for City acceptance,
a $5,000.00 cash assicn . Since the date of submittal of said assign -
ment, the tract was accepted into the naintained road system. The accept-
ance of the assignment was held in abeyance until the construction of all
iVrovements were approved.
The cash assignment was submitted for the guarantee of continual nainntenanee
of a flood p.ntectim wall along the east property line of the subject tract.
The City has the right to use time funds aubmitted if Chevron fails to respond
to written repair requests.
This assignment is a 30 month certificate and is renewable at the City's
discretion. The property immediately east of this site may develop into
single family residences. When that property develops, the flood wall
will be remved and the cash assignment can be returned to Chevron.
It is recemmeded that Council direct the Finance Director to sign the
assignment letter on behalf of the City, thus acoepL g said assigmmnt
and placing same on deposit with the City.
Respectfully 5#nxttedk
LI=VHMBS
City Engineer
IBE:JIM:jr
Attachments
Crismar
• DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
21W WASH IRE BOIAEMARD, SUITE MX
t.O. BOX 2131
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90106
(2IS) SV4865
14 May 1980
Mr. Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Dear Lloyd:
At last, the Lot 32, Tract 9434 problem with Doug Gorgen is resolved.
Enclosed you will find a copy of the executed "Hold Harmless" agree-
ment.
• At this time, I am requesting that you forward a copy of the approved
apron plan so that we may complete the tract.
Per our discussions, I further request release of the performance bond
on Tract 9434.
Sincerely,
Richard A. Petersen
Land Processing Director
rap /js
J
57
CHEVRON LAND AND DEVELOPMENT CO.
2120 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
SUITE 200
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90403
•
C. Douglas Gorgen, Esq.
7333 Hellman Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Flood Control Wall
Tract 9434, Lot 32
Dear Mr. Gorgen:
In connection with the retaining wall constructed on certain real property
directly east of Lot 32 of Tract 9434, (the "Property "), the undersigned
hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the owners of the Property,
their successors and assigns, from and against any loss, damage, cost or
liability, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees and
costs, arising as a result of the design and installation of said retain-
ing wall or the failure of the undersigned to maintain said retaining wall
in accordance with the obligations imposed upon the undersigned under the
terms of a certain agreement between the undersigned and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, a copy of which is attached hereto for your information.
The undersigned further agrees to provide for the removal of temporary
walls constructed at the present termini of Gala Avenue and Victoria Street
and the retaining wall directly east of Lot 32 of Tract 9434 at such time
as they are determined to interfere with the development of the adjacent •
property.
In accordance with your letter of February 28, 1980, it is our understanding
that you will immediately withdraw any and all objections heretofore made by
you to the relevant governing bodies with respect to the grading of Tract
9434 and the installation of the flood control wall on the Property.
Should the foregoing be acceptable to you, please so indicate by executing
and returning the enclosed copy of this letter to the undersigned in the
self- addressed and stamped envelope enclosed for your convenience.
Very truly yours,
CHEVRON LAND AND DEVELOPMENT CO.
BY: CRISMAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
By:
MARIO MORY, President
Dated: s' I z —° J
Accepted and Agreed to this day of 1980.
e�
M
A
I
CITY OF RANC :iO CUCAMONGA
To Whom It May Concern:
By the signature of its duly authorized representative
hereinbelow, the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby:
1. Acknowledge its receipt of the original evidence of
the issuance of a Certificate of Deposit by Valley Federal
Savings and Loan (Certificate N0.0%11t� to Chevron Land and
Development Co., a partnership, in the principal amount of
$5,000.00.
2. Acknowledge its receipt of an Assignment, for
security purposes, of the above - described Certificate of
Deposit, executed by Chevron Land and Development Co. on
1980.
3. Agree that the funds evidenced by said Certificate
of Deposit shall be held by the undersigned for the purpose
of securing the obligation of Chevron Land and Development
Co. to make or cause to be made any necessary repairs to
the retaining wall installed thereby and located adjacent to
• Lot 32 of Tract 9434.
4. Acknowledge that by virtue of said Assignment,
the undersigned is empowered and authorized to utilize any
or all of the funds evidenced by said Certificate of Deposit
to cause to be performed any required repairs to said retaining wall,
where Chevron Land and Development Co. has failed to make
such repairs and no less than thirty (30) days have elapsed
since each of Chevron Land and Development Co. and the under-
signed have been notified in writing of the need for repair.
5. Acknowledge and agree that it shall hold such
security until such time as a final subdivision map has been
filed which encompasses the real property east of Lot 32 of
Tract 9434.
6. Acknowledge and agree that Chevron Land and Development
Co. may from time to time substitute renewals or extensions
of said Certificate of Deposit or other Certificates of Deposit
in like amount for said Certificate of Deposit and that in no
event shall the interest earned on said Certificate of Deposit,
or any renewals or extensions thereof, or substitutions therefor,
be held as additional security by it, but shall at all times
be payable to Chevron Land and Development Co.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By
Dated: 5-7 Its Authorized Representative
CHEVRON LAND AND DEVELOPMENT CO.
2120 14ILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 200
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90403
•
C. Douglas Gorgen, Esq.
7333 Hellman Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Modification to Hold Harmless Agreement for
Flood Control Wall, Tract 9434, Lot 32
Dear Mr. Gorgen:
The Hold Harmless Agreement executed by Crismar Development Corporation
on May 12, 1980, with respect to the retaining wall constructed on cer-
tain real property directly east of Lot 32 of Tract 9434 is hereby
amended to include a rip rap apron structure as shown on the attached
Exhibit "A ".
The undersigned further agrees to provide for the removal of the apron
at such time as it is determined to interfere with the development of the
property directly east of Lot 32 of Tract 9434.
Should the foregoing be acceptable to you, please so indicate by executing
and returning the enclosed copy of this letter to the undersigned in the
self - addressed and stamped envelope enclosed for your convenience.
Very truly yours, •
CHEVRON LAND AND DEVELOPMENT CO.
BY: CRISMAR DEVELOPMEK-0 PORATION
/ Q
BY: � ) DATE: `_ 2
MARIO MORY, President '
ACCEPTED AND A EED TO THIS Z DAY OF �L ih.C- , 1980.
BY: �_ '
C. OOUG S ORGEN
•
• ,
0
I-1
lI
•
CITY OF RANU10 CUCANIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 17, 1980 ..
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Purchase of Real Property by County Flood Control
The County Tax Collector has forwarded five copies of "Agreement
to Purchase Tax Deeded Land" to the City for approval and execu-
tion.
The approval of the City is required under Section 3775 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code, so that the property may be purchased.
There are two pieces of land available due to deflaut in tax
payments, both are adjacent to Flood Control rights -of -way. The
County Board of Supervisors has, by resolution, declared its
intention to purchase the lands for use as flood control right -
of way.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council authorize the Mayor to sign each
copy of the two agreements and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
Also, to direct the City Clerk to return each document to Joe Bell
County Tax Collector.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:JLN:jaa
Attachments
J
•
W
Q
W
2
a
F-
W
a ,
_ 111
CITY O
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
ITEM:
$G 281
g55[S Nn Z27- ISZ-35)
NORTH
TITLE- - TA.%-DEEDED YKOPER ?Y
EXHIBIT Is SQ \LE NIS-
I
AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE TAX DEEDED LAND
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 197_, •
by and between the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernar-
dino, State of California, and the San Bernardino County Flood Con-
trol District, pursuant to the provisions of Division 1, Part 6, Chap-
ter 8, of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
W I T N E S S E T H
THAT WHEREAS, the real property situated within the City of
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, County of San Bernardino, State of California, here-
inafter set forth and described in "Exhibit A", attached hereto and
made a part hereof, has been deeded to the State of California for
the non - payment of delinquent taxes; and
WHEREAS such deed to the State for taxes includes taxes levied
•
by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the taxes of
which on the property are collected by the County officers'; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter - described property does not lie within
the boundaries of any taxing agency other than that, or those, spe-
cified hereinabove;
NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows:
1. That as provided by Section 3800 of the Revenue and Taxa-
tion Code, the cost of giving notice of this agreement shall be paid
for by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District.
2. That the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernar-
dino agrees to sell to said San Bernardino County Flood Control Dis-
trict and said San Bernardino County Flood Control District agrees
to purcna;e from said County the property hereinafter set out in the
•
A789 /05047 _
Page 1 Sf 4
aforesaid "Exhibit A ", which shall not have been redeemed as provid-
ed in the Revenue and Taxation Code, upon payment by said District
• to the Tax Collector of said County the sum set forth in said "Exhibit
A" after the description of the property and designated "Purchase
Price ", within 45 days after this agreement becomes effective.
3. That said San Bernardino County Flood Control District will
not share in the distribution of the payment required by this agree-
ment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their re-
spective names to be hereunto subscribed and their respective seals
to be hereto affixed by their respective officers thereunto duly au-
thorized.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO
•Clerk of Board of Supervisors BY airman
By
Deputy
(Seal)
ATTEST:
Secretary, San Bernardino
County Flood Control District
0
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
By
Chairman
l 4
A789/05047
Page 2 of 4
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3775 of Revenue and
Taxation Code, the governing body of the City of RANCHO CUCAMONGA hereby
agrees to the selling price as provided in the above agreement.
L
ATTEST: CITY OF RANCHO C U C A M 0 N G A
BY
City Clerk . Mayor
By
Deputy
.(seal)
This Agreement was submitted to me before execution by the Board
of Supervisors and I have compared the same with the records of the
County of San 3ernardino relating to the real property described
therein. •
County Tax Collector
APPROVED this day of , 19
By
65
STATE CONTROLLER
A789/05047
Page 3 of 4
"EXHIBIT A"
n
J
PURCHASE FIRST YEAR SALE
DESCRIPTION PRICE DELINQUENT NUMBER
North Cucamonga Town Nly 2 ft Lot 4 and $ 36.32 1973 20910128
Nly 2 ft of Wly 5 ft Lot 2 and S 1/2
alley vac adj on N of Wly 5 ft Lot 2
67006/20910128
• A789/05047
Page 4 of 4
i
J K '
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
APRIL 28, 1980
•
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -115
RE: REAL PROPERTY: F /C: PROPERTY BUY:
_.1, 2, & 4, DAY CREEK, UPPER WARM CREEK, MOJAVE RIVER
On motion of Supervisor Hansberger, duly seconded by Supervisor McElwain and carried,
the following resolution is adopted:
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -115
WFBEREAS, by action taken by the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County, State of
California, the Tax Collector of said County has been authorized to sell certain tax -deed
property at public auction; and
WHEREAS, certain of said tax - deeded parcels are needed for the public uses of flood
control and water conservation purposes:
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that pursuant to Chapter 8 of The Revenue and Taxation
Code, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, based upon the premises that the
hereinafter described parcels of property are needed for the aforesaid public uses, hereby
makes formal objection to the public sale of said parcels and authorizes their purchase in
accordance with said Code:
C. Assessor's Parcel 227- 152 -35 •
Assessor's Parcel 286- 163 -41
Assessor's Parcel 480 - 031 -07
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board shall file with the County Tax
Collector and the County Board of Supervisors a certified copy of this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the San Bernardino County Flood Con-
trol District, State of California by the following vote:
AYES: SUPERVISORS: McElwain, Hansberger, Townsend, Hammock, Mayfield
NOES: SUPERVISORS: None
ABSENT: SUPERVISORS: None (eh)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BE; :NARDENO as.
67
•
;< - 9507 - 103
•
6�
I, ANDREE DISHAROON
, Secretary of the Board of
Supervisors of the San
Bernardino County Flood Control District, San Bernardino,
California, hereby certify
the foregoing to be a full,
true and correct copy of the
action taken by said District
Board of Supervisors, by unanimous
vote of the members present,
as the same appears
in the official Minutes of
said Board at its meeting of
AFRIL 98 1940
•
April 29, 1980
Dated:
X25 ec: Real Property; PWA;
Flood Control
Tax Collector
Auditor
Deputy Secretary of the
and of Supervisors of San
File
Bernardino County
Flood Control District, San
Bernardino County,
California.
`
;< - 9507 - 103
•
6�
•
•
CITY 01: il, \i\0-1O C (_,\NIOXG,\
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 17, 1980
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: PROPOSED SUBOIVISIOtI ORDINANCE
As you will recall, the City Council continued the first reading of
the Subdivision Ordinance until the staff had an opportunity to dis-
cuss with each Council Member specific concerns in the Ordinance.
This has been done, however, due to the hectic schedule last week
and the heavy demand for the mag card machine which is being utilized
for the General Plan, the revised material could not he produced for
this scheduled public hearing. Therefore, Staff would recommend that
the public hearing be continued to the Council meeting of January 7, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
V4 L�JACK. L�M, Director of
Community Development
JL:jk
0
QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMO UA
STAFF REPORT
December 11, 1980
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services
Subject: Historic Preservation Commission recommendation for
designations as follows:
The following have been recommended by the Historic Preservation
Commission for designation as City Historic Landmarks. In each
case, a Public Hearing was held with property owner notification
policies adhered to by Community Services Staff.
Etiwanda Railway Station - This station was used to ship grapes and
citrus to market. It was also used as passenger transportation for
residents in Etiwanda. It is a modification of the Alta Loma Rail
way Station. First used in 1914. Commission unanimously approved
recommendation for designation at their October 14, 1980, meeting.
Etiwanda Congregational Church - Church constructed in 1902. Besides
being a church, it was used as the Etiwanda Justice Court in 1958 -60.
It has been a place of community meetings. The wood frame building
stands on the original site. Commission approval on 12/9/80
The Emery House - This home was built in 1908. The home plans were
purchased from Sears Roebuck in Chicago for $1,995. This price included
plans and materials for construction. The home is eastern U.S. style
of late Victorian architectural period. Commission unanimous approval
for recommendation as Landmark on November 13, 1980.
For your information, Historic Landmark applications completed by
property owners and /or Commission members are attached.
BH /mw
0
, %pplication :or
JOISTORIC LA!."NIARK
Desionation
I DENT IfI CAT TON
� c
1. Cannon name: ETI7i AIMA PACIFIC ELECTPIC RY, DEPOT
2. Historic name, if known
3. Street or rural address
same
7089 Etiwanda Avenue
City:Rancho Cucamonga (Etiwanda)
Assessor's parcel
Legal description:
Zip: 91739 County:San Bernardino
227 - 121 -18
,,Map 872 -36 -113, Parcel 2 Zone:
A portion of the south 132 ft. of the west 200 ft.
Lot 5. Block aK ", Etiwanda Colony Lands
4. Present owner, if known: Southern Pacific Land C%ddress: 610 South Main St.
•. " . _ ,., Los Angeles, Cal. 90014
City: Los Angeles Zip; .90014 Ownership is: public
private r
5. Present Use:ROLAIIDA LL5IBER SALES CO. Original Use: Freight & Passenger
po
Other pasts uses: T'hift Shop, Ladies Aid of Etiwanda Congeeational Church
DESCRIPTION
6. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the site or structure and
describe any major alterations from its original condition:
This is a one story building of concrete and stucco. It has a flat
• roof and an arch over the center office section, for a bell.
The open '4ait'_13g room facing Etiwanda Ave. has been enclosed.
A wooden loading dock has been added to the south and east and of
the orginal concrete open loading dock on the east end of the
building.
n
lJ
7/
ETINANDA PACIFIC ELECTRIC RY. DEPOT
7. Locational sketch map (draw and label
site and surrounding streets, roads,
'and prominent landmarks):
12. Threats to site:
8. Approximate property size: •
Lot size (in feet)
Building size Frontage 132
1E ft. x 124 ft. Depth 1320
or approx. acreage
9. Condition: (check one)
a. Excellent_ h. Good_
'c. Fair xx d. Deteriorated_
e. No longer in existance_
10. Is the feature a. Altered? xx
b. Unaltered?
11. Surroundings: (check more than one
if necessary) .
a. Open land xx b. Residential_
c. Scattered buildings xx
d. Densely build -up
e. Commercial_ f. Industrial
9. Other
a. None knorm_ b. Private development_ c. Zoning
d. Public Works Project e. Vandalism f. Other One of the last
P.E. Ay Stations. Upland, Alta Loma & Fcnn—a—save been
removed.
10. Oates of enclosed photograph(s) _ May 25. 1980 (four)
NOTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for structures only.
14. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone b. Brick
C. Stucco xx d. Adobe " e. Wood f. Other
•
-2-
7),
ETI=1DA PACIFIC ELECTRIC RY. DEPOT
15. Is the structure: a. On its original site? xx b. Moved?
• c. Unknown?
16. Year of initial construction 1914 This date is: a. Factual
b. Estimated Cost about $7,000.00
17. Architect (if known): 'A modifieatIon'of the Alta�Loma Depot:
Feb. 1, 1913 a contract for.fl,424,000 was awarded
18. Builder (if known): to Grant Brothers to bumld'the twenty' mile section
een up an an ann ernara no. ne formally
open July 11, 1914
19. Related features: a. Barn_ b. Carriage house_ C. Outhouse
d. Sheds) e. Formal gardens) f. Windmill
g. Watertower /tankhouse h. Other Sub- Statfoxgone
now gone
SIGNIFICANCE Upland; Alta Loma and Fontanan stations have been demolished.
20.' Briefly state historical and /or architectural inportance (include dates,
events, and persons associated with the site when known):
• The building of the railroad saved the growers a four mile round trip
to the Santa Fe By. The station was located in the center of a three
mile diameter circle that produced as many as 350 carloads of citrus
and 165 carloads of grapes each year. Also it was a passenger depot
within one mile of most homes in Etiwanda. One could ride the 58 mile
run from Las Angeles to San Bernardino in one houe and forty five
minutes. It also carrked the Students to Chaffey nigh School.
21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture
b. Arts &Leisure_ C. Economic /Industrial xx d. Government
e. Exploration /Settlement f. Military_ g. Religion
n
f;J
h. Social /Education
STATIC:1 AGEIITS: 1, C.H. Jones, 2, Wm. Lane, 3, Clarence Stephens
4, Bill Frost. 5, Herbert C.. Hall
22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates.
INTERCRBANS SPECIAL 61, LIiIES OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC, Northern and
Eastern Districts. Spring 1976. LSBI: - 0- 916374 -21 -1
23. Date form prepared _8 26/80 By (name): Robert L. Hickeox
Address: 7940 Valle Vista City: Raneho Cucac.onga Zip: 91730
Phone:982 -0304 Organization: Historic Preservation Committee
ty
?Z
_ pplicacion for ('
HISTORIC LA IDNARK
Desinnation
I DENT IF I CAT 10 :1
1. Connon name: Emery House
2. Historic name, if known
Same as above
3. Street or rural address: 7403 Archibald Ave.
City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip; 91730 County: San Bernardino
Assessor's parcel no. 107701143 Zone: --
Southerly 74' of the N'l together with the northerly
Legal description: 16' of the South ;, both of the westerly 335' measured
. from the center line of Archibald Ave. of Lot B of
Suction 2, Township 1 South, Range 7 west.
4. Present owner, if known: Address:
Ra3ph G. and Maxine N. Strane 7403 Archibald Ave.
City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip :.91730 Ownership is: public
vate —
5. Present Use: Residence
Other past uses: None
Original Use: Residence
DESCRIPTION
6. Briefly describe the present physical aooearance of the site or structure and
describe any major alterations from its original condition:
Redwood frame house, 2 storied with full attic, rock foundation,
with columned frontoorch. Built by Nathan Emery, assisted by
John Klusman, in 1968. House plan believed to be from Sears and
Roenuck 1908 Model Home Catalog.
•
7 l
EMERY HOUSE
7. Locational sketch map (draw and label 8.
site and surrounding streets, roads,
and prominent landmarks):
`N
6 4SCi,IW6' RD•
12. Threats to site:
9.
10
Approximate property size: _•
Lot size (in feet)
Frontage 90'
Depth 335'
or approx. acreage 1 acre
Condition: (check one)
a. Excellent xx h. Good_
c. Fair_ d. Deteriorated_
e. No longer in existence_
Is the feature a. Altered ?_
b. Unaltered? xx
Surroundings: (check more than one
if necessary)
a. Open land_ b. Residential xx
c. Scattered buildings (South)
d. Densely build -up
e. Commercial xx f. Industrial_*
g. Other (North and East)
a. None known xx b, Private development_ c. Zoning
d. Public [larks Project_ e. Vandalism f. Other
13. Oates of enclosed photograph(s) September, 1980
NOTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for structures only.
(Foundation)
14. Prinary exterior building material: a. Stone xx b. Brick
c. Stucco_ d. Adobe - e. Wood xx f. Other
15. Is the structure: a. On its original site? xx b. Moved', '
c. Unknown?
75'-2-
•
i
LJ
EMERY HOUSE
16. Year. of initial construction 1908 This date-is: a. Factual'' '
b. Estimated
17. Architect (if known): Sears and -Roebuck •(Model Homes Catalog, 19oa)
18. Builder (if known): ' Nathan Emery;-John klusm an
19. Related features: a. Barn xx b. Carriage house_ c. Outhouse
d. Shed(s) e. Formal garden(s) f. Windmill
g. Watertower /tankhouse h. Other i. None
Barn was built in 1909, used for sorting and crating oranges
SIGNIFICANCE
20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural inportance (include dates,
events, and persons associated with the site when known):
House a Easter- L'. S. -t rle of Late victorian arc hit__..._ =_1 per___.
• House and barn crigianlly surrounded by orange grove to Worth and
East, and by row of Eucalyptus trees on South.
9
21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture xx
b. Arts & Leisure_ c. Economic /Industrial_ d. Government
e. Exploration /Settlement f. Military_ g. Religion
h. Social /Education
22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates.
Official records, San 3ernardino Hall of Records
Correspondence with daughters of Nathan Emery
C scondence with Searn Cata�og Archives, Sears Towers, Chicago
23. 0a E'e `f0 rm prepared , -,,,,t ,nLpy (name : Maxine r, r3rp
Address: 7403 Archibald Ave. City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91770
Phone: 487 -2835 Organization: Historic Preservation Cam.
7F -3
Application for
IiSfORIC LNTNARK
sinnation
IDENT IF I CAT 1011
1. Conumon name: E =1 A::'Jd CC:'OHECA:LC ::AL C °CRCF.
2. Historic name, if known: 1Z=1!::DA r,• *cR- .. ^A=' : *AL r "RCR
3. Street or rural address: 71 26 Et!urar.c?a Ave.
Cjt y:. °ancho Cc- amcn:a (Etiw:a rda) Zip: 91739 County:Ean 3err.ardin o
Assessor's parcel
Legal description:
4. Present owner, if known:3 ti:aor.da Concregaticnal Address: 7125 3tiwar.aa Ave.
City Ra r,c ho Cucacp rca Zip: °1739 Ownership is: public
private x
(Eti.;anda)
S. Present Use: Cox -unity Church Original Use: same
Other past uses: Etiwanda Justice Court for trials, 195E, 19 -,e, 1960
DESCRIPTION
5. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the site or structure and
describe any major alterations from its original condition:
The oriwinal wo-ten church, with a concrete basement was extended
west by 20 feat and the west entrance to the basement ,;as covered
in 1912
•
7?
ETIWANDA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
7. Locational sketch map (draw and label
site and surrounding streets, roads,
and prominent landmarks):
atimanda
School
St a ticn
G Ho-e Tel. Cc
`1
a
�I
a.
v:
8. Approximate property size:
Lot size (in feet)
Frontage 150 _
Depth 220
or approx. acreage
9. Condition: (check one)
a. Excellent_ b. Goad x
c. Fair_ d. Deteriorated
e. No longer in existance_
10. Is the feature a. Altered? x
b. Unaltered?
11, Surroundings: (check more than one
if necessary) .4 frsme stucco real
Late office=_ is on the north
a. Open land x b. Residential_
c. Scattered buildings_
d. Densely build -up
e. Commercial_ f. Industrial_
g. Other
12. Threats to site:
a. Clone knosm x
b. Private
development,_
C. Zoning
d. Public Ilorks
Project_
e. Vandalism_
f. Other
13. Dates of enclosed photograph(s) 3,g79
NOTE: The following ((terns 14 -19) are for structures only.
14. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone b. Brick
c. Stucco_ d. Adobe_ e. Wood x f. Other
•
-2-
?g
ETIWANDA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
15. Is the structure: a. On its original site? "x b. Moved ?'
• c. Unknown?
16. Year of initial construction 1902 This date is: a. Factual X
b. Estimated
17. Architect (if known): ' - - '""" " " ". "'
18. Builder (if known): .... " .... ........... .... '..':..:. '......
19. Related features: a. Barn_ b. Carriage house_ c. Outhouse_
d. Shed(s) _ e. Formal garden(s) f. Windmill
A h1mch'ng rail is still aC curbside
g. Watertower /tankhouse h. Other i. None
SIGNIFICANCE
20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural inportance (include dates,
events, and persons associated with the site when known):
21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture_
b. Arts & Leisure_ c. Economic/Industrial_ d. Government
e. Exploration /Settlement f. Military_ g. Religion x
h. Social /Education
22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates.
23. Date form prepared /VA' By (name):
Address: City: Zip:
Phone: Organization:
0 City Use Only
W-3-
ORDINANCE NO. 128
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
ETIWANDA RAILWAY STATION, THE EMERY HOUSE, AND
THE ETIWANDA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH AS SIGNIFICANT
HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIG-
NATING EACH AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that the
following features of the City have met the criteria established by
Ordinance 70 for Historic Preservation, and therefore, and with the
recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates these
features as Historic Landmarks of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
a. Etiwanda Railway Station, located at 7089 Etiwanda
Avenue.
b. The Emery House, located at 7403 Archibald Avenue.
C. The Etiwanda Congregational Church, located at
7126 Etiwanda Avenue.
0 SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shalT attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to
be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in
TheeDDail, 8 ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City
o Ontaf rio, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Laurin M. Wasserman, City C erk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
I
CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONCA
STAFF REPORT
December 11, 1980
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services
Subject: Historic Preservation Commission recommendation for
designations as followst
The following have been recommended by the Historic Preservation
Commission for designation as City Points of Historic Interest.
Schowalter Grove Archeological Excavation Site - in a 1979 archeological
excavation supervised by Dr. B. MacAllister of Chaffey College, several
layers of bricks ranging from adobe through various stages of curing.
Significance of this site has been reported in the book "Cana Merced and
Rancho Cucamonga; by Esther Boulton Black; The Daily Report Newspaper
and the Highlander. Historic Preservation Commission unanimously
supported recommendation for Point of Interest designation as their
December 12/9 /meeting.
Aggazzotti Winery - This site was central to wine growers of our
area. Buildings constructed on the reservoir site of the old Rochester
Tract. Commission unanimously supported recommendation as designation
as Point of Historic Interest at their November 13, 1980, meeting.
George and Jessie Johnston Home - This was the home of George F. Johnston
a pioneer of the Etiwanda area, involved in local government. He was
instrumental in promoting the table grape crops in Southern California
and owned a local raisin packing house and steamer. Commission approval
was unanimous as December December 9, meeting.
For your information, please find attached applications for Point of
Historic Interest designation on the above mentioned properties.
Public Hearings were held an each property on the above listed
dates. Notification policies concerning property owners was handled
by Community Services Staff.
on
' ,,ppl4cation ror
alSTORIC LANDMARK
Oesionation POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST
IDENTIFICATION
J
1. Conmion name: CMA WINERY
2. Historic name, if known:
3. Street or rural address
AGGAZZOTTI WINERY
11929 Foothill Blvd.and Rochester Ave
City: Rancho Cucamonga CA
Assessor's parcel
Legal description:
San
Zip: 91730 County: Bernardino
Zone
4. Present owner, if known:
Dr. Carlo M. Aggazzotti Add rrSS: 11929 Foothill Blvd
City: Rancho Cucamonga CA Zip: 91730 Ownership Is: public private_ _ _
_jcz
Limited Vinegar
5. Present Use: and Wine oroduotion Original Use: Winery 50009al C_a_o.
Laboratory in wine cellar under the houseused for
Other past uses: wine analysis. _
DESCRIPTION
0
6. Briefly describe the present physical apoearance of the site or structure and
describe any major alterations from its original condition:
The house and adjacent buildings have not undergone any major changes
physical appearance is generally how the structures were at incep-
tion. The House was built in 1938 in the resrvier site of the Roche-
ster Tract. The family entered into the wine business in 195Q. the
buildings to the west were used as a laboratory and wine retail site.
In later years these building were remodeled and now constitute a
portion of the living quarters of the main house, these were in most
part interior modifications.The laboratory was moved into the wine
cellar located under the house.Present activities are vinegar productio
0 ,
AGGAllOTTI WINERY
7. Locational sketch map (draw and label
site and surrounding streets, roads,
and prominent landmarks):
W
d
FOOTHILL
L•
F`
J]
U
0
BLVD.
Winery
N
4
8. Approximate property size:
Lot size (in feet) •
Frontage 215
Depth 185 ft.
or approx. acreage 0.91 aerea
9. Condition: (check one)
a. Excellent_ h. Good xx
c. Fair_ d. Deteriorated_
e. No longer in existance_
10. Is the feature a. Altered ?(;n .prior)
b. Unaltered? Exterior
11, Surroundings: (check more than one
if necessary)
a. Open land x b. Residential_
c. Scattered buildings x
d. Densely build -up
e. Commercial x f. Industrial_
g. Other
12. Threats to site:
a. None known_ b. Private development_ c. Zoning
d. Public Works Project_ e. Vandalism_ f. Other
13. Oates of enclosed photograph(s) June 1980 taken by Leonard R. Goreayea
NOTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for structures only.
14. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone xx b. Brick xx
- c. Stucco d. Adobe e. Wood xx f. Other Cement
-2-
•
AGGAllOTTI WINERY
15. Is the structure: a. On its original site? Yes b. Moved? '
• c. Unknown?
i6. Year of initial construction 1978 This date is: a. Factual" Yes
b. Estimated .. ,
17. Architect (if known): Dr.. Carlo M..Aggazzotti.
18. Builder (if known): ..Don Francisco...' ... .. ..... :............ ..
19. Related features: a. Barn_ b. Carriage house_ c. Outhouse
--- '-' d. Shed(s) x e. Formal garden(s) f. Windmill
ne
g. Watertower /tankhouse h. Other cellar i,7yMX4 X Adfacent Buildings
SIGNIFICANCE
20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural inportance (include dates,
events, and oersons associated with the site when known):
Dr.Carlo M Aggazzotti, a graduate of Univ of Bologna,Italy arrived
• in the Cucamonga area.in 1934,Married in 1937 and built the Hain
structure in 1938 inside of one of the water reserviors of the old
Rochester tract.The site was central to the wine growers at the
location. History of the LaPoureade ranch and others relates to the
community iii this area. Dr.Aggazzotti used his laboratory for wine
analysis and control for various growers and bottlers including himself
21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture
b. Arts 8 Leisure c. Economic /Industrial xx d. Government
e. Exploration /Settlement f, Military g. Religion
h. Social /Education
22, Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates.
Don Clucas, Light Over the Mountain 1980 ed. Personal interview with
family June 1980 by Leonard R. Gorczyca. Tapes made of conversations
durin the intervi w.
21• Date fgorm preps red l0 80 By (name): Leonard R. Gorczyca
Address: 7426 Onyx Ave City: Rancho Cucamonga CA Zip: 91730
Phone: 987 -3234 Organization:Ch. Historic Preservation Comm.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City Use Only
•
•
is
9PdT REPO f
DATE: December 17, 1980
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
) , 7
Ar7ti
r
Div��
e
CSI
p
U g
7
U
>
1977
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT N.O. 80 -02 - LESNEY
A change of Zone from R -1 -5 single family residential to P.D.
(Planned Development) for 10 acres located on the northwest corner
of Hermosa Avenue and Base Line Avenue - APR 202 - 182 -13
ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of November 12, 1980,
held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above- described
project. Upon completion of the hearing, the Planning Commission voted
4 -0 to recommend approval of the change of zone from R -1 -5 to a Planned
Development designation. Several local residents spoke on the project
requesting clarification of the development proposal. Upon clarification
of the residents' concerns, no direct opposition to the change of zone
was made.
The Planned Development zone designation is being requested for the de-
velopment of a 114 townhouse development. This will be ownership housing
developed around common open space areas at approximately 10.3 units per
acre. The plan is consistent with the Interim and Proposed General Plans
and meets all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commis-
sion has approved the Site Plan pending approval of the planned develop-
ment designation. Attached for vour review and consideration is the
Planning Commission's Staff Report, Environmental Assessment, and the
Planning Commission Resolution.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended that the City
Council approve Planned Development Zone Designation No. 80 -02 for the
above- described project through the adoption of the attached Ordinance.
R�spectful�y s erimlitted,
Barry k. Hogan I
City Planner
BKH:MV:jk
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report
Planning Commission Resolution
Ordinance
IF(
dppli,ation ror
M015MRIC LANDMARK
esinnation " POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST "
I DEIIT IF I CATION
DON E. SCHOWALTER GROVE
1. Common name:
Brickyard and Ba
2. Historic name, if known: ( discovered by
ological Excavation)
3. Street or rural address: 8297 Baker Ave
San
Rancho Cucamonga , CA 91730 Bernardino
Zip: '
City: p: County:
Assessor's parcel no.See attached Naps. Zone:
Legal description: See attached mans.
4. Present owner, if known: Don E. Schowalter Address: 8297 Baker Ave
• City: Rancho Cucamonga, CA Zip:91730 Ownership is" public
private _X
5. Present Use: Partial Citrus Grove _ Original Use:Citrus Grove
Historicali. presumptive evidence of use of portion of
Other past uses: grove as a place of brick production and brick curing
for use in the local area.
DESCRIPTION
0
6. Briefly describe the present physical aooearance of the site or structure and
describe any major alterations from its original condition:
Site is an area approximately 60 ft, long and 36 ft. wide located in the
Northeast corner of the grove, adjacent to a brick wall which runs southe
from Foothill Blvd. along the west line of the Casa Volante C'obile Home
Park at 8651 Foothill Blvd. Area was excavated by an archeological group
supervised by Dr. B. MacAllister from Chaffey College,The area studied
covered some 2100 sq. ft to a death of 29 Inches. Excavation showed many
layers of bricks, ranging from adobe through various stages of baking
( curing). Layers of bricks were seperated by ashes of some material
which was used to cure the bricks. ( See photographs)
IFS
DON E. SCNOWALTER GROVE
7. Locational sketch map (draw and label
site and surrounding streets, roads,
and prominent landmarks):
RED RILL
Sycamore Inn'
P.E R.
Foothill Blvd
.0 Site L=
Z
x Schowalter Home
u,
Y
Q
12. Threats to site:
B. Approximate property size: .10 acres
Exc�oe si °e (in feet)
Frontage 60
Depth 36 ft.
or approx. =xxx)m 2100 se. ft..
9. Condition: (check one)
a. Excellent_ h. Good_
c. Fair XX d. Deteriorated_
e No longer in existance_
10. Is the feature a. Altered? XX
b. Unaltered? .
11, Surroundings: (check more than one
if necessary)
a. Open land X b. Res�ddeVial_
c. Scattered buildings t_
d. Densely build -up West- Mobile
Homes.
e. Comrercial f. Industrial_
g. Other South of Foothill Blvd.
a. None known_ b. Private development XX c. Zoning
d. Public Works Project— e. Vandalism_ f. Other
13. Dates of enclosed photograph(s) 2/791 4/791 6/79 and 9/79
Photgaraohs were taken by Leonard. R. Corczyca while excavation
was in progress.
NOTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for structures only. Not Applicable
14. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone_ b. Brick_
c. Stucco d. Adobe e. Wood_ f. Other
91
i I
0
DON E. SCHOWALTER GROVE
15. Is the structure: a. On its original site ?_ b., Moved?
• c. Unknown?
16. Year of initial construction " " This date is: a. Factual''
b. Estimated'
17. Architect (if known): " ''"•". .....
18. Builder (if known): '` " "
19. Related features: a. Barn_ b. Carriage house_ _ c. Outhouse_
d. Shed(s)_ e. Formal gardens) f. Windmill
g. Watertower %tankhouse h. Other i. None
SIGNIFICANCE
20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural importance (include dates,
events, and persons associated with the site when known): As reported by Nr.
. Donald E. 3chowalter, the site was discovered by him in 19;6,however no
significance was attributed to this discovery. Other portions of the site
were rediscovered by him and his son Stanley in 1950 s. His findings were
reported in to Esther Boulton Black in 1971 and appeared in her book,
Rancho Cucamonea and Donna ➢'erced published in 1975. In 1978 while worki-
in the area the site again was rediscovered. An archeolokical excavation
was conducted until 1979 by Dr. B. MacAllister of Chaffey College.
21. Main there of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture
b. Arts & Leisure_ c. Economic /Industrial_ d. Government
e. Exploration /Settlement XX f. Military_ g. Religion
h. Social /Education
lJ
22, Sources: List books, documents, surveys personal interviews, and their dates.
Rancho Cucamonea and Donna Merced , )! sther Boulton Black; 1975 oz 55•
Daily Renort 4/19/64 Sim Bald., The Highlander Advertiser 3/27/73
Personal interview with Don. E Schowalter 11/17 79 rem rt d bb Leonard
R. Cotc zyca. Archeo ogg al Report fo£thcomanj fEom DF �. 1�'.acA� lister
23. Date form prepared li��0 By `name): eonar orczyca
Address: 7426 Onyx Ave City: ancho Cucamonga, CA Zip: 9 30
Phone: 714 - 9`%73234 Organization: Rancho Cucamonga Historical
se
3- g
ppl ica Lion for
1ICS TOR IC IXAMArPn•"X paint o[Hl4t0nicat9n:e"e"t onLv
Desicnation
I DENT IF I CAT ION
1. Common name: fieong_e 7. and je.uie Yohnnton Nome
2. Historic name, if
3. Street or rural address: 6998 fiinanda Ave.
City:Fiiaanda (ra. Zip: 91749 County: San SennandLna
Assessor's parcel no.- [POntLoni 227 10/ OS Zone:
Legal description§6aeL of neat rh Loi /, BLach 5, Ftivanda roLony Lando
nee attached duui.1?-
• 4. Present owner, if known: —Wm and Wie Peannon Address :6U61uwanda Ave,
City: ftluanda, Ca. _ Zip: 91739 Ownership is: pub
private xx
5. Present Use: ain.gZe -fay miLVnea.idence Original Use: &uLc - nelidenu.j
Other past uses:
DESCRIPTION
•
6. Briefly describe the present physical aooearance of the site or structure and
describe any major alterations from its original condition:
The 6uLLd< Lean been n de Led and nenvea ae the nea.idence o4 the gneat-
9nandnon o4 yeo. 7. YaAn4ton. The 6ui,lding in in /good "pain See attached pAoto.
indlcafr o.79i n�1�lan curl 'T[.e'C •Su �Sequ e•nT ^h�in�r'.5-
4 Mp
GEORGE F. AND JESSIE JOHNSTON HOME
1. Locational sketch map (draw and label
site and surrounding streets, roads,
and prominent landmarks):
12. Threats to site:
8. Approximate property size: •
Lot size (in feet)
Frontage /45' 4t.
Depth i/2 fL
or approx. acreage /.07 acne
9. Condition: (check one)
a. Excellent_ b. Good_
c. Fair_ d. Deteriorated_
e. No longer in existance^
10. Is the feature a. Altered ?x
b. Unaltered?
11, Surroundings: (check more than one
if necessary)
a. Open land_ b. Residentialx
c. Scattered buildings x
d. Densely build -up
e. Commercial f. Industrial_ Other41a; awgi
a. None known b. Private development_ e. Zoning
d. Public Vorks Project_ e. Vandalism_ f. Other
w�9
13. Dates of enclosed photograph s) r54 1940'q, /8q6
NOTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for structures only.
14. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone_ b. Brick_
c. Stucco d. Adobe - e. Wood x f. Other
-2-
M
•
GEORGE F. AND JESSIE JOHNSTON HOME
15. Is the structure: a. On its original site ?x b, Moved?
c. Unknown ?`
16.' Year of initial construction Xd *X00417his 'date is: a. Factual x "
b. Estimated
' 17. Architect (if known): CAaAZeA ll. ,ones, San:
18. Builder (if knovm): '...' " .:......•.....
19. Related features: a. Barn_ b. Carriage house_ c. Outhouse_
d. Shed(s) , e. Formal garden(s) f. Windmill
g. Watertower /tankhouse h. Other i. None
SIGNIFICANCE
20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural inportance (include dates,
even =s, and p2rsons asscciatad with the site when kncan):
• Seonge J. �olwaton w one o� the pi.oneen Awd.liee in Cfiaanda. Ne uae
im uww-%&Z in promoting Me tabLe grape rnopi in SoaL%te Caaf. and owned a
Luca/ tai.e.i.n parinp house and rte,mren. //e ua4 involved in l cal govennnaent
21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture
b. Arts & Leisure_ C. Economic /Industrial d. Government
e. Exploration /Settlement x f. Military_ g. Religion
h. Social /Education
22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates.
Vaniour newspaper articler, aite drawLng, picturer.
lesronat CnteAVv Le uu.t% MA. If /tivy. !earron
23. Cate form prepared ja &4 /Rn By (name):�i //,;to
Address: City: Zip:
Phone: Organization:_ _
se Unly
• ORDINANCE NO. 129
•
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
AGGAll071 WINERY, SCHOWALTER GROVE ARCHEOLOGICAL
SITE, AND THE GEORGE AND JESSIE JOHNSTON HOME AS
SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE CITY AND
THEREFORE DESIGNATING EACH AS A POINT OF HISTORIC
INTEREST.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that the
following features of the City have met the criteria established by
Ordinance 70 -3 for Historic Preservation, and therefore, and with the
recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates these
features as Historic Points of Interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
a. Aggazzotti Winery, a family project, located at
11929 Foothill Boulevard.
b. Schowalter Grove Archeological Excavation Site, located
at 8297 Baker Avenue.
c. The George and Jessie Johnston Home, located at
6998 Etiwanda Avenue.
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to
be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in
The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City
of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
IF6
crry or• 1C,%�cI Io
ST IT RLP01(
c;
1977
DATE: November 12, 1980
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMVIT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -02 -
TENTATIVE TRACT 11350- LESNY - A change of zone from R -1 -5
?single family residential) to P.D. (planned development) for
10 acres located on the northwest corner of Hermosa and Base
Line Avenue and the development of a 117 lot townhouse devel-
opment consisting of 114 dwelling units APN 202 - 182 -13
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval of a Planned
Development consisting of 114 townhouse units on 10 acres of land located
on the northwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa Avenue (Exhibit "A ").
Approval of a Planned Development constitutes a change of zone. The sub-
ject site is presently zoned R -1 -5 (single family residential on minimum
• 5 acre lots) and the change of zone will be to the Planned Development
(P.D.) designation. In conjunction with the Planned Development, the
applicant is also requesting approval of a tract map consisting of 117
lots (Exhibit "B ").
The site development plans indicate a density of approximately 10.3 units
per gross acre. The Interim General Plan indicates medium density resi-
dential at 5 -15 d.u. /ac for the project site.
This project has been reviewed and rated by the Design Review and Growth
Management Review Committees in accordance with the residential asses-
sment system and the Growth Management Ordinance. The project received
a total rating of 86 points and met all minimum point catagories within
the rating. The Planning Commission originally reviewed this project
at its meeting of October 22, 1980. Staff had recommended some site
plan changes which the Commission did not fully agree with. Therefore,
the applicants have made minor revisions relative to buffering and fire
access.
ANALYSIS: The prnject density of 10.3 units per acre, is consistent with
the Iifterim ano proposed General Plan. Should the Commission act favor-
ably upon this project, then the Planned Development zone designation
will be applied to this s,ibject property pending Council approval. The
development plans, as proposed, are consistent with the development
standards cuu is sued within iue Planned Development zone designation.
The land use and zoning of the surrounding properties is as follows.
fo�
Staff Report
November 12, 1980
Page 2
North
South
East
West
LAND USE
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Mobilehome Park
Single Family Residential
ZONING
R -1
R -1
R -3
R -1
There are no single family residential streets which abut the project site.
The project site is bordered by the rear yards of single family residences
on the north and west sides of the properties. These rear yards are pre-
sently separated from the proposed site by a 6 foot high wood fence. The
developer originally had shown only a 5 foot landscape buffer along the
north and west property lines. A revised plan will be available at the
Planning Commission meeting along with sections for those area: to indicate
a full 10 feet of landscaping. It is recommended that these areas be
densely landscaped. The project, as proposed, meets all building setbacks,
lot area and parking requirements. The subdivision map has been prepared
in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the City Subdivision
Ordinance,
0
The City Engineer is recommending that the east side of Hermosa Avenue be •
widened and improved at the same time the west side is improved in front
of the project site. In such a case, the City would enter into an agree-
ment with the developer for construction and reimbursement. Further, the
City Engineer is recommending that the new street improvements incorporate
the use of native rock into the new design to maintain the character of the
area.
The conceptual landscape plan indicates a substantial amount of landscaping
and mounding on the interior of the project. The project appears that it
will meet the Commission's criteria of 50 trees per acre. Various pedes-
trian sidewalks interconnecting the units with open space areas are provided
throughout the site. Curvelinear sidewalks and mounding are being provided
along both street frontages.
The Design Review Committee reviewed the building elevations and archi-
tectural design of the project and were very satisfied with the style of
the buildings. The Committee did recommend that the final roofing material
be subject to Staff review and approval prior to issuance of building per-
mits. Colored renderings and elevations will be available for your review
at the Planning Commission meeting.
The developer is proposing to provide the following special project features
within this development:
- Solid core exterior doors and security deadbolts •
- Preplumbed units for solar heating systems
- Energy conserving building materials and appliances
q'3
. Staff Report
November 12, 1980
Page 3
- Option to the home buyer to purchase a solar collector system
- The project proposes to provide 15; of its dwellings at afford-
able housing range, consistent with the Growth Management Plan
definitions.
Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff
has completed the environmental checklist and a field investigation and has
found no significant adverse impacts upon the environment.
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was placed in the Daily Report
Newspaper. In addition, approximately 60 public hearing notices on the pro-
posed Planned Development zone designation were sent out to surrounding property
owners. To date, no correspondence has been received.
RECOMMENDATION: Two separate actions are required by the Planning Commission
if approval of the project is given. If the Commission concurs on the approval
of this project after consideration of all public hearing input and staff
findings, then a Resolution recommending approval of the Planned Development
designation to the City Council is provided for your adoption. In addition,
• the Commission should instruct staff to prepare the final Resolution of
Approval for the tentative tract map, with conditions, for their adoption.
•
Re9p ctfullysubm tit ed,
starry Hogan
A Planner
� G:
BKH:I`iV: jr
Attachments Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
Exhibit "0"
Exhibit "F"
Exhibit "G"
Location Map
Tract Map
Site Plan
Grading Plan
Landscape Plan
"L" - Building Elevations
Part 1, Initial Study
R ecO;,rended Conditions of Approval
Resolution on Planned Development Approval
�I
J
a,
e
If =Y
NORTH
CITY Y C)1'
RANCHO CU( 'AN N.GA Trn.r;--U:CACI nl Mf4P
ntT�
F-6"
•
0
ORDINANCE NO. 130
. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
202 - 182 -13 FROM R -1 -5 TO P.D. LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF HERMOSA AND BASE LINE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
folloo-:ing a public hearinn held in the time and manner
prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property
hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a
public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law
as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
• SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
R -1 -5 (Single family residential) to P.D. (Planned Development)
Said property is located on the northwest corner of Hermosa and Base Line,
known as Assessor's Parcel No. 202- 182 -13.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall Cause the same to he published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES•
ABSENT:
9 ATTEST:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Idayor
oren aGCermin, i TjM$ I R q
•
CI I'P OF It` "I'Ilrl Cnr'!!T:i:il
1N1'T Ti L S'1'fD"i
PART I - PRO. ECCr INi`" PIIATION SHEET - To bo completed by applicant
Lnvironmental Assessment Review 1'co: $70.00
I -or all projector rcgn.'rina rcview, this
form must Le cumplctarl and sulnlitt, -'1 to tlho bev1'I(T1Tont
Rev ie�d Co-- i.trcc thro',,mh the dup;rrtmont vircrc the
project application i..^, made. Upon receipt of this
application, the hneiro "r ntal A;r:l oi.s staff 1011 prepare
part II of Lhe initial SLntly. Th'o i`, ^1�•r•n�•��L hen io.r
Commit)... will pact an! LM aMen no dnt,r than tell
(10) dr.•,c '. "or the onblic m"(,tin, .._ •:.hich Lime td:^_
project is to he hoard. Th., Co:rnli Ltll wi 11 m;dte one of
three dctmm nntims: 1) The pr.ojcc-t ,ill have no
cnvir i, rtal .impact and a N. gative I'ocluration will be
filed, 2) The project will. have en environmental iMpact
and an Ln mownMal Impact Report l:i 11, be nronarcd, or
3) An ad(ditional information rcpor'l: hcu)d be supplied
by the applicant giving further in:orr,ation concor.ninrr
the pre^ose:d pl:oject.
PROJ$CP TITLE: H rn,l I'rvnh.,rss Iont.iti�o Itic[ S, 113iO
APPLICI+;;'T'C NA�;Q AD'DMSS, 7ELi; Ti{O::il: Iesn.: nrccicnr..e nt f,o.
C_tl n '�n It „Ic '1'II =. (:,�, <I(ta (L_(21 3 bil_71 17
NAME, AIT!:CSA, 'P d'i,i7Cllnisis OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
COP:CP:MANG MIS PROJECT: ihnnk Fillimms M E. "P” ST.
O thin, CA. 01764 (714) 98¢ -5814 Itvv, ?r(Atld Er:inct•rs)
LOCATION OP PROJECT (STREET ADOW:FG A7:p A6SI:SSOR P.h ?C1:1, d10.)
_, rrhvo.t Donor ul °rv„Linc vid Ila rr . �,1 :crnue
I,i S:T C`TII1:I1 P!:PIII'1': M1CI;!::'.Fi1R7 I'i(OII If)f "„!., PI'GIONAL, FTiATF ANU
PEDERM, AGM UPS AND TM AGI;NC`i 7F:;IV ❑G FOCII PILFMITS:
I'd li r� rl loan [I:c I'duommo lgo,Ln "! Kdll Ovum
flr '.c:M rn_n _:rl Iron Lhv Per +r.li[11 I'im hi s�rlr[ .mad Cw,imong,
I -1
L`ROJ!'c' gllSi l;iI rI0:i
J
DESCBI["r IO17 OF PROJF,CT: am, ed v't__
development consistim, of clusters of 4 and 6 unit buildings. Recreation
facilities including a pool and rrc. building sbnll 6c cons[ ru<C Cd_
Approximately 18.5': of the units shall be riced a.v affordable _
bows ing. ].one chaloo `r>m ex isti niz, R -I -i to PI). Proposed dun Sity is
IOJ units per gross acre.
ACPI:AGi'. OP' flirt Tl(CT ARi'T i,P:D SQUARE'. I'OOTA91: OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED DUIIAWME, IF ANY: Project arcs: 11.0 Acres (gross),
10.0 4c re= Inet) F.[!stin" b -A ldfmgs cover ns =0 ?.F., ore- )used buildings
INCEI 171E TIi I'n ;'aTIC:I 01i 'i! +'e C :' i! :'i , ri; v.I-S ('r:'L!ic! ,
ADIItIi,T,; , t \'i'i CUT.T ;;i'-4l„ HISTr) PICV. !1!' r :C - :'! C, ASi F,-TS, USI;
OF :ihi lir; 11110'r CP:r TES, A ^D THE M ';::'RIi TI N OF'
EXISTING STRUCTUPXS AUD THEIR US!: (ATTACH NEC-ESSARY
'ale -ir _ ito c prpS +r1h 'n l it—, grove w_i_t6
srall^resty_lnduuc huildin . _Totac cast Of the proper
across Hermosa Avenue- is a mobile hang Lerk_T. the north and
,st _ 'I' -, the scu[h, rxc Cpting two
Iva hl lore ilongsjdtnf� "' L'n ':es[ of Hermosa Ace_
irC�li C,mii4e rrsidc +aes :__,The_f_, Iydmd feet iuos[ o(lermosa
id lir•rrle I of ❑, rl illy exist ,ry_1 '+ter ys' .roves e '4ith cl
res I C n c. T'c swthen =t corner " Uro intersection. of 3e SeLi ne
anal !ieno.oea Ave. is a Sou Churn California Edison Co. substation.
Wi-Idlifc can 'sts of •ry o�,nd r_denecibirds rommen to raside n[ial
arc is. lizards Arid insects.
"
roY ar n Wli,+]r: )w. -e : :ic;ni_ir,vlc Oil': 1 lint act?
S- z
•
ti'c: 1.1)
1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
2.
Create a .^,ubntnnti.al change in existing
noise or vibration?
3.
Create a sul;C.v,tial, ciiam:o in demand for
municipal s_r"ices (Felice, Lire, wator,
sewage, etc.).!
X 11.
C'rcntc c'.::. n.:.= in ':,..r r:- :irting zoning or
goncra) plan desi•_:nntions? .
X 5:
Remove any existing trees? llow many? cur. uxw
G.
Create the n ^od cur use or disposal oC
potentially hn::ardcl.:^ 1'11:r•rial.s such a,
toxic substances, ELu :unab]es or explosives?
E }:pla»Dti.on Of ally Yf — EFisting usage of the
�m�c ^� site is _ip .r irnr: rn�:S -nis trees .dill ho rc;u"d Rjior
• to h inni ne constructton. Some cro`•v may be saved if finished
�rs_s1a>•_s_5_1- 4'.�[o_; sistiny 11,unc trevu. Zone cha nEC^
from R -i =i to Plt it 4•nyi t� Ill.l uni [ =_j'r r_�r'ns._�r rr ).
Ib1P`7 pry If M nro uct in "ol•., 'ahc' c. ^'l �.t r'.:ctic;l ("
_— rosid.,:'^.tial unit:;, c ^it 1!'tc the fore, on Uln,
next page.
CTTTIPICATIQtl: I hcrchy r-cr.l:ir_ Lh.nt Lh^ statemrntn furnished
ahovc oni in the att:ach;d crhit,i L? pro =enL Cho dat.n and
iillern•'Ition rcnuired for Lhi!= ini.Li11 r:•n l•tlL irn to I:ho
lout r`. al•llit,, awl LE th, 1:lC-n.ms, and
intnrry Dion prv,qnl:cd are tv, an"I crreoct to thn NO of
a ri'llt •.ri „1 r °•,C °.nn r ^:v l,c rrmnf ^ %•I to �I•r :;nl•n,itted
lcfrn m ', Ir.: ^,Lc r'enulatieu can l ;v miclu by Ow „......it
Itcri etc C: ": c,i 1't c'o. j -l-.
Uatc I b !i�c _ Signatnrn
Title ti f ?.',. /lt -i
1 i IL 1•r,,• !'1" PT'1•i
I'1
L I
The £oliowinc inforr'ation sln)uld be provirind to the City If R.mclw Cuc:omOngn
Planniml Division in Order to aid in asscsnin', tiv, a::ility of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Hamo of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: 1oa " rn.
Specific Location of Project: ',r by corner of IlaseLine .Ind ilermosa Avenue
11I11"Mi I I'TWIi-, 2 11171.':i: 7 I•!V,F:; 4 Tr)'PA.i,
1, Nu:'I'ncr of single
family units: X14
2. plumb ^_r of multiple
family units: p
3. Date oro.�ose'1 to
4. C.0 licst: date of
occV.Pn:lc' : oial
Idodnl.
awl e or Tentativo
s.
on: !0 Prir:e P,,.;1-•„
', -I "A" units priced per al tord.lhlo housing Criteria of the cite
it -I Plus re rent frtee not cet Jutrrminea
- -1 plus li"I lry fricc 71st .ot de. err lJ�eJ
n_9 I'I•i r" oc vet Jr[enni nod
I'_e Pri, c' not tot 11 t c rmi nrd
RESOL LIfilyd NI). 80-66
A RFtnlIIrip^ or -IC p[)tliI;I, CnCS•I I SS IWI Dr Ti IF
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONOITIOMLLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP i10. 11350 (P.D. 80 -02)
WHEREAT, Tentative Tract Map tin. 11350, her ^i Oaf trr' .. thl,"
snhnlittvd by Lesny Pevelopinent, epPlicant, far the purpnso of Sl;bdividing
the real propnt'ty s I. t Led in the C L of Rancho Cucamnnna, Cnna ty of
San Cerna'dino, Soto of California, civscr'i l +rd as the development of
a 114 unit Planned development located on the notthwest cnrnor of
Hermosa and Base Line dividinq 10 acres into 117 lots, veonlarly came
bnfm'e the plane i't'p R + "u.tiasion for uuhlic han'inn ,tnd act I "i on Novetnttar
U. 1980; and
1.1HI:RTAS, file 0irer.tnr of Co]:m:'mi I, Onv °inpn „`IC ha; reconnuended
aomnval of the Clap s,,lh.iec f. to all conditions set forth in Lhe Engineering
and Planning Divisions reports. and
WIICPEA�, the Planninn Cuntrission has read and cmtsidered the
Enuineering and Planninn Divisions rnporfs and has cues idrred other
evidence presented at the Public hearing.
NOW, THE4F.FORE, thr Planninn C.o;jmlicgiea of the Ci`y of
Rancho �:uca,nooga di °; glve +s ` ^II ,
• Section 1. The Plane ina ConunisSit, :;�a'. the fniln::ing
f lndinns 'in renoi',f to Tentative Tract N0. 11,150 aIIi rhr tloo thereof:
(a) The t ^ntafivr fract is consistenr with all toolicable
iIterin: an :1 p, po;e,1 gE aI 9lid lr. 1`lans:
(h) Thr f,, ,,,I nr i:rpr .... . 2r:enrs of I. I_ :tt atite Tract is
_ ^r; .'.'n' ::i t:, all 1 I`ii'ah iI, a ,, ,,
!Iei�°ral and 5 {,r; ifir. plans;
(ci Tht, :ih, is phvsical ly sI,ital`I, for the` tyPO of drvelnpmen t.
preen cpd;
(d) Thn do¢ign of the suhdivisinn is nn` liiply to cause
:Ohs t,'+Pr ial envit- monttl dar,ane ant avoidable in,lru'_y
to hui -ins and wildlife m' Yhefr habitat.;
ghr tnnrnti:° tray`
nmJ 11 (.,1e11n:L for ai,rr, Lln •,,,Ill, nr uSn ttf Ilin
::iris i�, 'P. I' •,1 .lf "i %r-+nn, I I
)le)
P" solution No.
Page 2
(g) This pt'nject will m,t create adverse impact,a nn the
enviromn nt and a flegative Declaration is issued.
Section 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 11350, a copy of which is
attached hereto'-Ts hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions
and the attached Standard Conditions:
Plannin9,_�ivision
1, the 4`1,0,ject must be consistent with the General Plan and
all of its policies and guidelines at the time of final
neap approval for subdivisions and at the time of building
permjt issuance for all other residential projects.
2. Prim to approval and recoMation of the final map. or
prior to issuance of buildinq permits, when no subdivision
map is involved, lm-itten certification from all affected
SrluDnl Districts, shall be subraittei tc, the Department of
Cmmnunity Development which states that adequate school
facilities are or will be capahie Of iccommodating students
generated by this project. Such letter of certification
must have been issued by the School District within sixty
(6o) Awls prim- to the final map approval in the case of
tl,e 4ihdivisinn - f or issuance Of vc,.,its in the ca;e of
all uthor residential pro,lect.s.
. 3. prior to approval and recordation If ti,e final map, or
1" 311 to the issuance of hailding r ",,•,;tc •.dmn of map is
rove! vod, written certification fro'n the affected water
district, that ademiate 5 °e:nr and are or
will be availal•le to serve the pmpn son pro.iec.t, shall he
submitted to the Upptn-tment of Crnnnunity Nlvelolvumt.
Such letter lust have been issued hr the v:atgr district
ulthln ciatr (N)) days prior to £roil nap aj,;wmal in the
case of Sut,(Hvision nr is,loancil of pefmitc in the case of
all ether residential projects. for prnjra,, using
septic tank facilities allowohle by the Santa Ana Regional
',Jitor Cfntrnl Roard and the City, vu-itton certification
of accPotabjlity, ior,luding all supportive information,
shall be obtained and submitted to the City.
,JI =;roe hen':: in a -'1e,; Cf ft•.o :1 l.,gt in ,.er'ical
it r! ighf shall he landscaped and irrie.a `c•I in -,rrrr is nrq
C�or -ii, nr'l. Sucn slr,pg hlantlug shall nvlude but, not, he
Iimitrd to lofted grnund cover and appropriate shruhs and
rv.aintainrd in o h.•al tk, on,l tht Ivinl rnnttit inn by the,
davelnper until each individual unit is snld ,and octapied
bDLO tq', :n. ;, . {,.. .,, i.e to,:ir� .... ,.,, ::,. •:...a
unit., an jnv, ,rtion of the dopes h,III be completed by
the PI mninq ',taff to rleb.injine thaf it, is in satisfactory
rn ".1i �I ten.
•
5. This approval shall I°nrome null a•rd void if the tentative
suhd i'vision war, is col. al,pro':ed anri n•conlod or building
permits issued when no map is invnlved, within taclve
(12) months from the approval of this project unless an
extension has been granted by the Planning Commission.
6. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and lacks
shall be installed on each unit in this pinjert.
7. Security devices such as window locks shall he installed
on each unit.
S. A samplp of the proposed roofing natrrial shall he adxmitted
to 'Ind alrl,roved by the Planning Division prim` to issuance
of but iding pernri ts.
g. All mrits within this dnvpinc° enf shall be pr'eplumhed to
be adapted for a snlar heating unit.
10. This development shall provide an ortirn to home buyers
to purchase a solar heating unit. A copy of the sales
material shall be submitted to the manning Division
prior to sales activity.
11. Adogonte einrrgpncy fire ar,cems landecaoing shill be
Provided along the north and west property lines.
• 12. A toll ten (10) feet of dons, landscauing shall be provided
aimig the north and west property lines.
13. All duel lino urit.s shall be provided with an automatic
garage door- opener.
J,. tP, i,a,iin, shall tie porriifted wi"rin t�.•, inr,ori rr eir•C!�lation
;hall pn dg.pl, red h'/ the eppIict nt and
5ninitted to the fify Planning Division prior to issuance
of building pecliits.
15. All landscaped and open areas shall he continually maintained
by n Ilomennner's Association or snore nthpr method acceptable
to the City. Proof of such ina t tit pna rice shall he filed
with tine Citv Planning Division Prior to issuance of
building pernri ts.
16. Ado t.airr+d linnt in'7 nl, +,n :'n.,ll 1,y 5ih..; ••q,{ ;n.l {��rr,
t'ne .1.•, i!1 ,�i��rt i. ts. 1:: n;i�n. vo-t In, •,ig of ail
evterinr Iiglit•s to he located nn the project site.
Sm:h lirthtinq shall he so decinm d in shinid adjacent
prnrertr e; fr'nri light and pr'nvi -le only necessary lighting
unrdnd
for sornrtry to the dove lopnipnl, such plans shall
he sulr ^ittr rl to the Plnnnin❑ Diviai yr for r, +✓iee and
appIov -rl prim to issuance of building hermits.
III
17. Al swimmi ill pools ins tql led with the development of
this project shall be solar heated. •
13. Trash pick -up service shall be. provided to each individual
unit and containers shall be kept out of general view from
the street.
19. The C. C. F R.'s shill restrict the sl.n rage of recreational
vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source
of transportation for the owner.
20. Standard patio cover plans shall he sul+mitted to and approved
b. the Cit•, Planner and Ruildino Official prior to occupancy
of the dwell illy units.
21. Prim' to gr3dinq or any Work on the site the applicant
cltall contact the Dirac for of Cnrmwni LV 5ervirte G7
determine if the exi Sting StruCturn is of historical
significance v:hich would warrant its relocation by the
applicant for preservation.
22. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards
and procedures.
23. De,'ails of the retaining Will and yrn,ling t.j, icue along
the m'opPmtp line shall he inc,l,rind in the final
grading plan. •
24. Turr Ill 06 attest shall he provided IF 1-4 the visitor
l+ari'ing area to the circulation aisles leading to the
dr+Clligg g + +,iis,
25. Speed Pm ^ps shall he provided alum; thco north and west
driveway.
26. All buildings numbers shall be identified in a clear and
Concise manner, including proper illumination.
Enr�inrr.r_ing Division
27, F. '•.r; frr' Slrl rl'. ;uSl.is .. �n +i qucu, rn
Hell sa A;rnde Siraii be dedicate•,! to the City.
StJ^°+ts for futur'a Cnnnngti,, f tFr.
cnt,:h hacrnS
shall he plugged in a +annor suitah)r, to
the City Ilrginn.,r. lhn cost of il—M ,illat.ion will be
credited to the draioagy fens fnr the pro ioct,.
•
113
i'ago 5
29.
The deco lnprr shay widen the east cide of Rermnsa
•
Avmole including curt,, glitter, sideomlli, driveway
approach, street lights from Base Line Road to the
S.P.R.R, arid on Base. Line from Hermosa to 600 feet
east to the required width of the master planned streets.
The construction cost of this widening will be reimbursed
by the City. The applicant shall be. responsible for the
design. The applicant shall enter into a cooperative
agreement with the City for the construction of and the
reimbursement for this widening project prior to issuance
of any permit for the project.
30.
lhn unique clwractor and appoarancr or IL•rvlocn ,Avrnuo
and Race Line Road, with its unique rock work, shall he
inco,pm ated into the widrninn i,rnjec t. A conceptual
plop in perspective view shn•wing this special feature
shall he submitted to the Eno i neeri ltn and Planning
Departments for approval.
31.
A cash deposit shall he required to cover the cost of
the grading and paving no Bace Line Road prior to issuance
of huildinq permits. On completion of the grading and
paving, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the
cash deposit shall be refunded.
.,2.
All 1%,ia.ing rnarml'nts lying irli tnIll till' fAiun• right-of -,.ay
arr to Iie quit. claimed or del innated, as per the, City
•
Engineer's renoi remen Ls, prior to recordation of the
tract .map.
33.
;,11 Per inn, t " I landccaPed v.9 1 I1 luu' =d to be
altnexed into the landscape Ilia intonluice. district.
34.
lam,tr,caping and irrigation s• ;aten; rnunired to he installed
on public right -of -way perimeter of this tract area shall
be continuously maintained by the de•+eloper until accepted
by the 1'.ity and annexed into the landscape maintenance
district.
35.
Final t,lanc and profiles shall show thn location of anv
eristirn,l utiltiy facility that would affect construction.
36.
'i ;111 I-e i, f,,., r.; ?,an.e and
disrr ;sal of dnin.,ae ^nll —1
37.
:n�rnr:'atFd rlra iran^ fll'::: 0,7'
drains ,:ell
0
1►q
APPROVED AND ADOPTED 1111'4 96TH DA'i OF ra".i tl!A:R, 1930.
PLANNING COM;1 ISSION Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMDIi04 •
Richard Dahl, Chairmari -- -- - -- - -- � --
ATTEST:
Sen'etary of the Planning Cn�nmissinn
i, JACK LAPI. Sar,reta,'Y of the PIannin,l Commission of th, City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do herehy certify that the foregoing ite•.,.lvrion was duly and
regule.Ov introduced, Passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetlno of the Planning
Commission held on the 26th day of November, 1980 t.ti the following vote
to -wit:
AYES: CO'1MISSIONERS: REFIPEL, SCERANKA, TOLSTOY, DAHL
':OES: Ci1!'`:1$i10'n'F5S: NONE
ABSENT: C011F11S, IONERS: KIGG
•
>
ll S
I': I ,,•,.••!1. ^r,,• , ., I'i nlr: rt:V:n 1:I
:4I1InloiVn i i'II- I'1'I0N.¢
• Subject: planned DpUj,)p=MLNu Rn -n9 and Tpntativn Trart Nn 11150
Applicant: Ipsnpy neyij nmpnt _,
Location: Pjwr Hermn<a and Racp line
Those items checked are condittons of approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT TFIF PI.AN'IVA; IIIVISIOTI rOR CONPLIAW:F. WITH THE FOi,LOWINC,
CONDITIONS: "
A. site DPVClorment
g
0 Ski. e shall be I,vQ,md in accorda::ca with thn ar:ror"d site plans on file
in Me Flanni.nn Division anti the conditions contninad herein.
2. ?evised site plans and buildinn elevations incor:"`ratine all conditions of
approval shall In sul,mitted to the Planninq Division vrior to issuance of
building Permits.
X T Approval of this repiest shall not ="n wnu,li.anc,e AN Al s,niw, of
Me Zoning nrdit'dtnc" and all other applicable Cip mill! ances in effect at
time at N'tildinn P,:rmir
• 4. The d., i >lopor 50.111 provide all Ict= Otto ad,nan ;i'.a"rd area for
Recreation ve'ni,ac S&rage r'l mant to City s"MaH --
$_ 5. "nil boxrs, in ar,,ig whan, sidevalks nro rml•.Ilr,-i, Omll in in:shAled and
located by the dQwlgor subioct to aunroval by t.im plvm tvl Division.
% a. ;rash reccvt"71, i•.., t, ;wll .:'i^�`d "y a ,•'tiih .. .:all
-- .,Oh ,-ieW craVOn inq quo, "0 to COY AHi Im"Non s'nall
be subject to an;aovat h; tAte Planninq pivi; ion.
7. I,`' t1M'nll inm+ ar„ to 1" rtnn otrn ^t•,'i in an area i,•si ma, —i by uio roothill
Pire District as Anwvlww4 the roof materials mm be approved hp
No Firo Chief "it I`laW" Ilivis m.. nr for to i = =non C° of it buiidinq permit.
R. Th•a •tevelonr i ;ti,i l in! —rio- a '•r'! "lv e` n^ an
.. ` mityrialc d
color, into t!,- .i,;t n•i of th,, r ":i k.ntinl d•vol r.,.m':n: in a manner which is
both compatible and mirplimentnry amcn•t each of the residential units.
$ ^. A11 roof .... ,•it':, Inr'lmllnn air' c „n,iit l „m-r:, .hall la` rci,it "c Virally
i toagrat.ed, r:h,,•IKo lwo' ,.i "'d u,t th" .n ,vl hui ,.,.� a:
+d � a rep. r, nrnper[i.es
and sir m an t, piing by on I'lanninq and fens ltm: Divisions.
X 10. Pr for to any ir.,. ,! Iho Ir„ „•'I silo nr h, r:ilv,,:.: .r liri l^ 1,.,
inn �'m•nnttred
all ..'i'r� ,:: i,w.J Ptntw„I h, Pin ,hill he completed Meted to
the sat isfncl.inn ' the iiy li�,eoliq mmit.
) I �
P. Parking and Vehicular A't ... ;.;
1. All parking Int lan'L Cap•d isia;, lc =hn11 1,,,e a ntn lrnm in =iris dimension •
of 4' and shall contain a 12" wal Y. adjacent to parking stall.
2. Parking lot 1;ghts shall be a maximum height of 12' ;ran the finished grade
of the parkinq surface and directed away from all property lines, adjacent
streets and recidcross.
X 3. Parkinq lot trees shall be a minimum 15 aallon size.
X 4. All two -way ni•;le wirlths shall he a minimum of 24 feat wide.
X 5. Emergency access shall be nrovidnd , maintennnve (room and clear, a minimum
of 24 feet with at all timo-- durim, constrreti on ill ncrnrd•vlce with Foothill
Fire District fe.r.l i, ements.
X G, All parking sp,ic -s hail bn rir•uble sLr ippcd.
C. Landscaping
X 1. A detailed lanrlsnnpo and irrigation plan shall he nul+mitted to and approved
by the Planninq Division prior to the issuance of buil•linq permits.
X 2. A ^,a,Lr.r Plan of t.hc. i <sistinn :q, -site lrres r.hnl l h" provider) to the •
Pl ann i;,q Divi =inn prior to the issuance of bail•iini cermits and prior to
grading to determine which trees :;hall be ret.aine:l.
X 3, Existing FucalY "tu:: rr' "es nhnll be retained whole•'er rnss ible and shall be
tri mined and toil i�,q It 1N, r,e id, der a': inq n. „•..,vi I lc danv taus trees.
shall I;e apprnv —1 far r "mrn-ol a1; thn di.,-,rot inn of !" Plann inq Division
during the re0n, of the •b,s[ "r !'l.v, of ,'aistin•, ::n- f+ie•'Irv"s. 9'110se
trees ','hich are a,•F!'rvoI far romp "vl =hill le re:•1 ar 9 on a tre =- for -tree
basis as provided F'; tiv Planning 1)ivinjell.
X 4. stro,•t . tr",•,, n rt nin'ne of 15 vat lnn r•.,.o cr Inr•mr. •-lull I•;• installed
in arcordanrn wo 1, tl,o 'last "r Plan of street rr, —e for the City of Rancho
Cucamnngn and t;hall i— pl oaf "!I at. All nVoraQP nF every 14" nn interior streets
and 20' on ext "rior stronts,
X 5. A minimum r,f 51 ,"q'a a::r.,, c...- .::.•1 nr •�„ `•Ile' „n -t sia ^s, shall
-.1. .. P L ±r:-•r, irt-L= gallon.
and 101 -5 va ll:rt.
X h. At Lan•1 •,cal of a,,I; =hall he ci i "in•rl 1n a hn.il th-: earl thriving condi-
tion, free from wrods, trash, anal debris.
•
117
Signs
X 1. Any siws Prnrn :m' E+r t.his do ^ ^hn rent ;It"' be 1.,:'. iTnnal in conformance
with the SLgn orrlin.uicr and shall rngnirn review and approval
by the Planninq nivi =ion Prior to installation of such siqns.
_ 2• A uniform sign vroiram for thii, Anve1opm0nt •1:311 Fr snDmittrd to the
Planning oivir;ion for their review and approval prior to i:anauce of
Building permits-
E. Recreation
_ 1. The dsvalol:et' is r -uir& t., ^b' -ain the fo11o'.;ini si Tne''. r.Lntenr:nt by
purchasers of ham" which have a pr'lvate or public nVvstrian trail on
or adjacent to their property.
In purchasing the home lnca tad on T,ct , Tract. , on
(date) _ • i have read the CC&R's and underst,nd that
said I,ot is subject to a mutual reciprocal casrmr:nt
for the purposr of allo•.rina ,,jaestri,n traffic to gain
access.
S"W"i
chaser
Saul intwaa is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to
occuuancy.
F. Addis ion.rL i +rrrpvals Bngnl rr•1_
__ 1. bircrl nr Rovlr.a •:hall hr ncc:ompii shrd 1•rior to Iltc i:auanco of a Building
prrmi L.
n
LJ
_ 2. P ... ;f•..< prior to record rt inn of the final
sr1xirvrsio'1 t-�;•.
X 3. Approval of T+mtnt i s Tracy. !;o, 11350i, •lranr,j; 1,0 K—i,, to the approval of
Planned Cevelopment 4. °C -C?
_ A. This t'nnd iti reel I'•rmi• .. tern rn9 fr,• a I.Iri, +l of m,nth(s) It
which tLmn t.hn Ivtni:r; " ^nm r =r v'n mri Old nr i l••to cnntittrons or revoke
the Conditional :' -n Pnt'lI.
11?'
APPLICAtI'I' SIIALL CONTArT 1917 PVIu uv; Itivi:'1I••I I'ng '.l I'I'il '11117 COLLO'Ai NO
CONDITIONS:
G. Site Development •
X 1. The applicant shall comply Leith the lnte,st adopt'rl Intiform Purld inq Code,
Uniform Mechanical l'wl', t4rifnrm PLimhinn Cod', !latinnal Electric: Code, and
all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval
Of this project.
X 2. Prior to issuance of bni lrlinq p'rmite for comhustible gcn5 t ructi nn,
evidence shall be s,,thmitted to till Foothill District Fire Chief that
water supply for fire protection is available.
A 3. Prior to th_ issuanr'' of a building permit for n ne': rn >: idential d•.eiling
Unit (s) or mil +r addi tine .o an 0%istinq unit (s), rile applicant shall pay
develei•mont ferns =t the rstnblishrd rate- cM'll fe,. may include, but not
be limited to: .;• n'nn[i fi rarirnt Fon, Par4 Foe, Dra inane Fro, S7stems
Development C._., iermin and Flan Citeckinq fees,, ^and school fee.
4. Prior to the isvu vlrrl of a huildinq permit for a nerd commercial or industrial
development or arldition to an er.istino development, the applicant shall pay
development fees et the estnhlished rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: c•tctems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and plan
Checking fees.
X 5. This approval shell bcoMr Will and void if buildinn r'rmits are not issued
for this rroi'r`t within nn� ;car from lh' date n-
Diner ol:proeal.
X
---_ G. Sheer ear's aml nidrassos Shall be prac i,l•d t••; fl ;•tn lma rff icnl. •
11. Existrml SY. ruct:ures
Provide compli mco until rhn Unrf'rm Building Cad'+ far Prop•rt'y line clearances
considering unn, Wren and fire- rosistiveness of 'xivttinq bnildinus.
hx 1st inn I•ui L.linn (s) ^hall Ill mAr'l tc rotnnly with oin'rnnt Puildinq earl
Zoning rcqulationa for the intended use or t.hn buii,linq shall be demolished.
7. FZis•ina s,.,a.... !. .:.,crl f.: ;li`: t•! or capped
to ',omply wi!.h i;q ['npo lot''urn(Itnu plus's ices and t),e IIn, fern Plumbing Code.
I. ,rad inq
X na of Chi it. i,,,. t. . •
...,i,,,. r.: •:ht11 F� in r...,,...i i_.�.r�at .,.,, "nifcrn
bnrldmy Co.e, -;t'; :rn iin, = ramlar'is and acrnpt -i •!rni inq practices.
1i
_ 2. A =oi is is port raiaI br nn pare,I i mnl if ierl rmrinn•r licensed by the
State of California to Perform such work.
3. A geological rel,ort shall he orlpnred by a .lualified engineer or geologist
• and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
X 4. The final grading nian shall be ,ubin,t to review and approval by the Planning,
Engineering and Huildinq Divisions and 511,111 be completed prior to recordation
of the final subdivision map or issuance of buildinq permit whichever comes first
APPLICANT S!IAL6 CONTACT THU. RIY:INF.FtRitl: DIVTSTON COR CO`IPi.IAN:II. WITH Tilr FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
.1. Dedications and Vehicular Access
1. Dedications shpt! ,:• ino :e by fir•.L rap of 111 into!irr elrcet riaht.v- of -,.,ty
and all necessary easements as sh.;em on the tenta01'o map.
X 2. Dedication hall be i. -,ade of the foLlew inq mrasinc: tights -of -way on the following
streets:
27' n:l'litLonal . feet on Base line Road
1)' additional feet on _Hermosa Ave, and as vana6 e w�dfF on
additional feet on Hermosa Ave. at the intersection of—
Base Line per tentative trac map.
X 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards.
_ 4. All rights of vchirular ingrea to and egress from ehall be dedicated as
follows:
5. Reciprocal easements shall !•o Dtrovi - ?od rnsurinq access to all parcels over
Private roads, drives, or ?,arkinq areas-.
X G. Adeq'uato I`r'nisinns nha1L Ip,p na,!e frr the ina�ec:, ,•mn „ =. and intoinal
circulation he 1151.1 !"1
of goads to Che
property nr, in the ice n( the In'o1 ",..rd
K. Street 1,-pruvrmonts
_ 1. Construct. Pell rtrvnt iml,,r „vemvnt•: inollidinq, bet m,t limited to, arch and
cutter, A.C. 1•ac„•m.•n'., aide1<alk, drive approaches, par4way trees and street
lights on all tn' „ti -r -t r•pots.
I1
U
X 2. rrvtr.truct the frtlo. inn min: <im; : n•rrovcmrrtis ins
to: Judi nn, b.n_ not. limited
__
$'1'KEUT NAME
CL'Rn c
CU'rTIIR
A,r.
Plnll'.
Siigq_
WATX
Ok
Af I'!:.
STRf,Ii ?'
LIGHI'F
A. C.
( +'JF.Ill, 4'i
IJIIECI.
CII,AIR PN.IpS
OTHER
Base Line
Hermosa-
X
X
X
%
X
—
%
X
X
%
%
%
X
edian
'sl and
I
•
"on Hermosa, the pavement shall be P.C.C. at the intersection and replacement
of all P.C.C. pavement is required on Base Line between W. property l wigha A$rpst�rsectior
- 3. Prior to au',' ':!• +ina perform -i in the cuhlic rioht -of -r; ay, an encroao'1h-
mont permit and Lars shall De nbtnir.od from the �il-y Engineer's Office, in
addition to any nthrr permits reguirod.
4. Street improvom^n` I•Lms arprocnd h;: tho rit,' I:nu ill —I and pr spa r ed by a
Registered riviI Fvtineor �hnlI I- regniroci, for all siren improvements,
prior to issuance of an encroachment permit.
X S. Surety shall bo pnsted and an agrCnme;it exocuted to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and the City Attotney, auaranteeinn cOn"'Ic' ion of the public
improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuanre of building permits,
whichever comes first.
X •G. All street rierm:emr`nc, chill hr. installed to thr satisfaction of the City
Engineer, prier to occupancy.
PRvQm ^nt stripinn, mv'k inn, tt'affir. and street: nom.. signing shall be
installed per t1w rr juirm, ^nrs of the City Gn'tino,".
L. Dra inagc and flood Co rtrN
% 1. The aigQ icnnh ':ilt I� r":q`rnrsihL• .`er ran ;t rncCron 'If all onsLte
drainage
facilities rr ptnal !, `h, t'i b, ':nuincrr. g
2. Intersection dram >:ill h_ ,t,ti;�d at the fnl h:.ntr: 1 "cat inns:
The Proposed pn•p•o f. (, +ll - -+i rlin nemv, in•1 i•ti r•.t n- ;ul•iec t. 4o flooding
unln.r the !!n� irn.il i'I�r• I In •n tnc� Program and +i„•'t to the provisions
of thit prior to �: r! •'ire ^r ii•n ,'.1.
4. P drni noun rb tin ^I
"It "1 . -1,'' nil '.ill F .vluirr.; to rrotect •
strur: tare= 1';' ii•: rr!i...t eheot. :uc ^ff to
1C�1
X 5. The Hermosa /Avenue ' ;•1,111 h^ de::i •1.n•1 d::
sarryina st,--t n..,ni, .rl a n tti ^.n IF .. ;: I, i.aI ctrl: h ^.inhts, commer-
c101 type drive npnrnnches, roll•.I street - orin,•ot lens, flood protection
walls, and /or land ;cnp^d earth perms and rollod driveways at property
line:
M, Utilities
X 1. All proposed .Itilitiss .:i.thin th^ project nhall 1„ mst,111H underground
inclouing utiltl[cn alenq "I", arrerinls 1^rs; th.m 12 I:v.
X 2. I'tility eascm•,ntn shall ho hrovi`l-q to th^ cn ^ci f1. ari,,,•, of the serving
utility companies ,end the Cl'.y En'tinoe I.
X 3. Developer shall b^ responsihle for the relocation of existing public
utilities, as required.
X 4. Dove l oiler shall In` respond I,Io far the insta t la'.ioc or ,Arcot Lighting
in accordance with southern Californta Edison Company and City standards.
$ a.ib,r imi ..n,n :.'n-. mall `. rip :iun' "i n,a, r,n : :,rn Cted to moet
requirements or Lit-, Cunanunna County Water Ui si r[`r. (^('WD), Foothill Fire
Pi st['ict and Lh^ F :nnironmcnril gaIlth n"'art"'T!, ^f ':he ('n'a r. ^( of Sin
Bernardino. 1 loth' :cr of CCCI` •s[I1 I-I rop:[red prior to
recordation.
% G. Appmvais ha•:^ 11". 1 ^n ^u s•'r' ^ -1 `r0n all end intro ested
agencies invn;..,•,l. ;tp1`t o :'ni of tho final man ,ill .. snhtect. to any
requirements tha" no'; h" :. :vi :•c•i from thorn.
N. Gcnoral Itegniram0nts and Ar:voval:�
1. Permits from ,U,'r aq "ncf" :: will he required ns
—B. roueI ..0 i ^t �,l19t111I1It Ate pit red prior to is ;aance of a
hr,i,li ^.,r _r,irt
San HI, r,i r'ii n0 r.' ,t', Cl ,,I Control 11 t. rlrL
- -D. OLhnr:
% .. A cnhy of eh" c-ro.,nanl c, vnlit loos an,l Ne=t :rl rrigtr: h'('fi P'e] and
Art 1 ns of in °nr rnra t' ^n ` Ha, gr.mcnam•rs t,r :—ri t' inn, sul•iIct to the
n
1111r' : :ai of V", I 'i f.tpon : " Ah I11 bn recar l„I t :.ith t !ii ; ral' and n co(w
p rrvided In II!^ '�t �'i.
I �a
3. Prior to rocnrdat inn, a !lot ice nl Int.ntinn tc fnrn and hi.nhting
Districts shod Iv, filv9 ,it,, tIv• "ity Conned. 9'I n• cirli m;nri an costs
involved in District Formation r.haLl bp. Iwrne by tha developer. •
X 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures.
•
1�3
rI
L.
•
1.
d
t�
Y
TQi,r r
rnncr
CITY :)F
a RANCHO CUC: MONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
N o. _ ..
(' C 19
ITTNI -Tr� lo50
TITI.Ii' TFA,T MAP
V V
NORTI I
N•
f
•
1.
d
t�
Y
TQi,r r
rnncr
CITY :)F
a RANCHO CUC: MONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
N o. _ ..
(' C 19
ITTNI -Tr� lo50
TITI.Ii' TFA,T MAP
V V
NORTI I
CITY 01"
lkivNcl-lo CUCANIONG;A
PLANNING DIVISION'
ITEM: 11390
Tlll.E: FLAM
tAl 11BIT: sc\[,[::
yp
IF7
1• L ,
NORTH
I
•J
uj
1 7t
14 t i
..... ......
c2 �2 2
2W
CITY OF 11 7-F= 050
RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLAN
I'LixINNING DIVISION' Ex I I I I 11T: SC-\ LE;
r-V
NORTI I
I�
WNW
&
71
r-V
NORTH
CITY OF llt m: TE W560
RANCHOCUC," ION G"k TITLE: -j4jr a.P,Pe Ft.
PLANNING DIVNON EXI 111III r: SCULL: V) TS
it
I�
WNW
&
71
r-V
NORTH
CITY OF llt m: TE W560
RANCHOCUC," ION G"k TITLE: -j4jr a.P,Pe Ft.
PLANNING DIVNON EXI 111III r: SCULL: V) TS
A
LIIT ILL-110M
CITY OF
RANCHO
PLANNING DIV[SIO-N'
WIN.
F kqt- [LL V1 T - . .
lq.l ll�All.
F-7.
RIA, qtvNmq
NORTI I
ri i:,\ i: -.:TP- -n!j�2_
TITII:
I:XlllHjr. "C-7' SC\LE1
Alt
o
��Y `mot � •��i,L ,:']�'�+
3� WYlwrn 41Sw".i:AS)cti^3 ��xs�=lll.
LIFT uewnnx
I.Q"T W1.19.
�h �.F "• h `: r" �� � yet ;•✓�`� • ry� .
RIGHT [Lty,"Qm •
Ptk%K yitiom
V
i`oltrf+,
CITY OF rrI':.\I: TR 11 50
RAINCI-IO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ALLY, �:--LeVATOO �
PLANNING DIVISION EXIpull- "N' SG\LL
Tfis:
•
'
y +
Ta
r w � =:�u ' (;' 'L'�'e➢y .,:��� ➢�Pag� �n'.a u ' L:a e"E .� r..
tC3
L111 IL.Illl..
reox+ nw.non
.N6'�+ '_ . r.:�. s3uiL'.'��e �fci'a?•Y:cu'wrr
.I uw. V ox_
-. ;"+,, .*.: f;• i¢ +SKr y�� '1e�
. +��. J s' .r �'�G!r .I6' a `tli" �iIF tl'i1��- (1''➢ �'�] 'Wta1".
•_�..vs�.,mil[,diti.
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
R.. Kb.9OM _
CV
NORTH
rrrm1 IF- 11350
TrrLET ELL /L1r(DNS
1� N �� �c
LXI11111'1' .�_ SC. \Ll L__I S _
I ... 1 .11, .11. .
•
I ,
C�
NORTH
CITY OF ITFIN I: - :M I
y ;;��/ TONS
-GA
RANCHO CUCANIO,"� TH LF: A •
PLANNING DIVISION
•
r
I �:��''c'i' � i�; -.�� �:�y.,<��jy,�..,. •;�'7�rL91 '�N�o ".am =' 1 €i" , �{�
.�'. ... yLLlj�� �.. C'aiy. G'�•C f.l i'. .
LEFT .Lt,.:lOx
.xuxr Ua ..,e.-
II14Xi 119V.,IOx
CITY OI'
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• PLANNING DIVLSION
xnx tter.nox
C V
\ORTf I
ITEM: iF 1 L350
TI "TI.I: -U' EL�VfI�mNs
I -� C
PXI 1111IT �.S( LFa N S .
c
.:��'
`" : �y�tn,• If ':1111 =.., •Ili
��
,i..
°,r�s:,-
Q
Maitrsr.n k.;. {lirc: �. ;
tnwmv T-.n.LxL�t
. �;
CITY OI'
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• PLANNING DIVLSION
xnx tter.nox
C V
\ORTf I
ITEM: iF 1 L350
TI "TI.I: -U' EL�VfI�mNs
I -� C
PXI 1111IT �.S( LFa N S .
sloes
!6FY
U
I L
hNst woo. .11,
C5�V
NORTH
CITY 01, , 11350
'"NC'-l() CUC"ION TITIJ:
III-,\,N\I.N'C, DIVISloN, I:xllml-r: "), sc.\Ij�: � 9
IJ4S! Cf.
Z V
!110X1 ELEY.110N
NORT i I
CITY OF 1'117X1:-7F7: �1�
RANCHO CUCAMONG)A TITIT: L—Lr:�VAT-IVA)s
PLANNING DIVLSION A).T.S•
low,
NORT i I
CITY OF 1'117X1:-7F7: �1�
RANCHO CUCAMONG)A TITIT: L—Lr:�VAT-IVA)s
PLANNING DIVLSION A).T.S•
1.0r, kt,
.'! �la , �R�g
, zV11 Rik
It., I'l-T
C5��
NORTI I
•
CITY OF rrrmi
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITUll-LU-7. 1 I. VATIONS •
PLANNING DIVLSION ENI IMIT: sc-\ u:: A I 'T
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Beverly Authelet
I am sorry, but the documents for the Refuse Item had not been received
in time to include within the Agenda Packet. They should be here very
late Friday. I will place them with the packet, of it.
•
7
I
-- CITI'017 ItAi\CI 10 Cl'C\ VO\C� `o '` Q v )�'
STAFF REPORT
G O
DATE: December 17, 1980
U >
TO: City Council and City Manager 1977
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -15 - LANDMARK -
A change of zone from A -1 limited agricultural) to P.- multiple
family residential) for 12 acres of land located west of Beryl
south of Mignonette - APN 202- 032 -71
ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing to
consider a change of zone on the above described project on November 12, 1980.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 4 -0 to
recommend approval of this zone change to the City Council. Attached is the
Staff Report presented to the Planning Commission, in addition to the Environ-
mental Assessment and the Recommendation of Approval. For informational pur-
poses the Staff Report in Tentative Tract No. 11563 is attached. Several
local residents spoke on the matter, generally requesting clarification on
the project. No opposition was voiced on this project at the time of the Plan-
ning Commission public hearing.
The project applicant has also submitted a residential project in conjunction
with the zone change which the Planning Commission has reviewed and tentatively
approved, pending the final approval of the zone change by the City Council.
The proposed project will consist of 92 condominium units. The zone change
and proposed project is consistent with both the Interim and the Proposed
General Plan.
RECOHMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended that the Council
approve the requested change of zone as described in the Planning Commission
Resolution No. 80 -59.
Respectfully submitted,
BARRY K. HOGAN
City Planner �
'
BKH:MV:cd
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report
Recommendation of Approval
I�1�
n
U
I �
U
•
(71N OF R: \ \CI10
STAFF REP01VF
DATE: November 12, 1980
TO: Planning Commission
FROH: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
1977
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -15 - LANDMARK -
A change of zone from A -1 limited agricultural to R -2,
(multiple family residential), for 12 acres of land located
west of Beryl, south of Mignonette - APN 202- 032 -71
BACKGROUND: The applicants are requesting a change of zone for 12 acres
of land located west of Beryl Street and on the south side of Mignonette
(Exhibit "A ") The present zoning of the property is A -1 (limited agri-
cultural) and the request is to change it to R -2 (multiple family resident-
ial). The actual density of development that would occur on this site is
controlled by the Interim General Plan range (5 -15 dwelling units per acre).
The applicant is requesting this change of zone in conjunction with the
development of a residential project which is also on this agenda for the
Planning Commission's review and consideration. This zone change must occur
to allow the development of the project site as proposed by the applicant.
ANALYSIS: The project site is presently occupied by an unmaintained
citrus grove and is surrounded by various vacant land uses and agricultural
uses with residential uses beyond. Specific zoning and land uses for ad-
jacent properties is a follows:
LAND USE ZONING
North Vacant A -1
South Vacant, Existing Egg Ranch A -1
East Single Family Residential A -1
West Vacant, Abandoned Egg Ranch A -1
Thus, the request for change of zone to R -2 is consistent with the Interim
General Plan Land Use Element. The zone change is also consistent withthe
proposed General Plan which shows a low- medium density of 5 -8 dwelling units
per acre.
Attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as
completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study,
the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon
completion and review of the Initial Study, Staff found no significant adverse
impacts upon the environment as a result of this zone change. If the Commis-
sion concurs with us, and recommends approval of the zone change to the City
Council, then they should also recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration.
I,V
Staff Report
November 12, 1980
ZC 80 -16
Page 2
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing within The
Daily Report newspaper and approximately 50 public hearing notices were sent
to surrounding property owners within 300' of the subject property. To date,
no correspondence for or against this project has been received.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a
public hearing and receive all inputand data. If after such consideration,
the Commission concurs that such zone change is consistent with the General
Plan then a Resolution, recommending approval of Zone Change No. 80 -16 should
be adopted.
Respectfully Submitted,
i /
'AArry K. Hogan I
Yty.,pl'anner / I�
BKH( V:kp:cd (/
Attachments Exhibit "A ", Location Map
Initial Stud }, Part I
Resolution of Approval
E f ��
•
•
•
r�
u
n
•
.ii /G Utz /izd f•on Maa
Soo,
M
Line
CITY 017 1WN1110 (11CMWIGA ,.
INITIAL STUDY •
PART I - PROJECT INIVRPiATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Envirotvnental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all project's rcquiri.ng environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Cea>mittee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Envirc- imcn.` -a1 AnalyrF r staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The no•:olnrl+ent Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee %:ill make one of
three. determinations: 1) The project o: ill have no
envirenr,er.tal impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Imuact Reuort will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should he supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project. •
PROJECT TITLE: CuL, nunuGa \'i lla s. 'l'i nlniivr 1'racL 115(,
APPLIC7%NT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPDON : Lawh,,arl:_Cnnsnitants Inc.
rn)-' R.. ^IL .St. (TI'land, CA 91756 71 1-081-51,02
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO P5 COMPACTED
CO1:CERS7' :G THIS PROJECT: I . ndin.,ri C,in!+,,Mt lt.s, luc. _
9U2 R 9th tit. Up1.rwh (:A ')1786
LOC71'rlC:1 OF Pr2,77= (ST"t"T ADDE"'-
��sl .I I'�• ..I ,u�, ..nth ^i .',i..n gym; 11 "— . I
LIST OT Iii:' PER:IITS Fi +?M 1C7-:., RE:'>in':AL, tTATE AND
FFDEIIA i, nGi:I:Cl:';: _..._ - "'iTS:
C;no.vnnn n Ca nu t: 7.nl, r I�1 till,, f ('..tlii. U• 1. I R .,I I sL•b
I.1
� 30
j
PROJ:= DLSCRIPTION
•
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ?� Unit Project
ACRFAGh OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED 5UILDINGS„ IF n]Y: 12 Arms - No Fsistine Buildings
p. ..I :n x It00= 11•t pnn gi,.t.,,ci ,Mv S.P.
DCSCRIPE THE E77'JIFP`171F*: FAT, SETTT` OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING TNFORNLATION OII TOFOGPAPI!'i, PLl T5 (TREES) ,
ANIi P,LS, Ai:i CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF PFOPEP.TIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF AM
E}:ISTI::G STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
'P1 �i_,jy_1 eit • C{yj s tills oath ',ct�, rr,�sln alclt• 3 Pvrc mrt.
Th" if ', rr .-0v ,, cilt'us prove
"1' , rtrc roctl ..... Lorth of it.
• '1'" tl •vast is z r sidenv, , ^ilh T born _
l: )c• =„c th is nn
T. ll o vu vt i'ir, �•lr I'unilc hem's.
Is the project, pirt of a larger prcj eCt, one of a =series
Of nr•a laL ioe lrticns, '.:h ich althc•:c'•t indi'riduallp small,
mad as a whole hove ;ic,.ificnnt envLr ^rc,ental impact?
z- 2
131
PULL TIITf' Pi:O,T!CI':
YES NO
S 1. Create a substantial change in ground •
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
S 3. Create_ a substantial change in demand for
municipal ser ^ices (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)!
4. Create change= in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
% _ S: Remove any existing trees? Flow many? 700+
6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any Y @8 answers above: Z.owne will be changed
Iron, .\erirvlWE" (a R, eid,.n linl
cxintin•• Ci1Yns ern'rc 'Hill Dc rcn
IR11JRIIA :.T: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
Cf7RTIFIGITTON: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information recuired for this initial evaluation to the
best c` c; at^i iiv,, anti that the lofts, statements, and
inforr,atinn prescnt:ed are tru^ and correct to the best of
my and !)-lief. I farther undvr;tand tint
acditienal mnv bo required to he submitted
before an adr.;unte evaulation can be made by the Development
Review Ccrnittce.
Date Signature A' �.-- rC ✓%�- -�'-__
Title
•
Y 9
lcr.s_,uc!:Tlnr, r•n•:r,•rrncTrov
• The follos:inq inforriation should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessinq the ability of the
school district to accoimnodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: ALnar Corp. , Ltd. Tentative Tract 115
Specific Location of Project: wc,st d Beryl k South of Mirmmcttr
PIIAFT: I PNi•.Ar 2 PIIhSi: ] rIlArP A TOTAL
1. Number of single
family units:
2. Number of multiple
family units: R,
3. Date proposed to
begir. ccnstructien: 111/81 1 1 o / "2
Barli.cst date of
occupancy: 7/`17. In tfL I /a+
Modal P
and . of Tentative
5. Bedrocns Price nn ^gin
A
It
t'
t7
•
z- 4 l 33
}
0^ RESOLUTIO'I NO. 80 -59
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CIICAMONGA PlIVIINO
CO:IMISSION RECYMEHOVIG APPROVAL OF ZONE CIIAIIGF.
N0. 9015 REQUESTING A Ch AMGE IN THE ZONING FROM
A -1 TO R -2 FOR 12 ACRES LOCATED WEST OF DERYL,
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MIGNONETTE - ASSESSORS PARCEL
110. 202- 032 -71.
WFEREAS, on the 22nd day of August. I ? ?.�, an application was
filed and accepted on the above described project; and
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 6554 of the
California Government._ Code.
SECTIMI 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Connaission has made
the following findings:
1. That the subject !)tot,(,) ty is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access,
size, and compatibility with existing And use in
the surrounding area:
'ON 2. The ernposed Lone Chanoo ::null not have sionifieant
imp et on the envi rnn'.ant nor M. surrounding
properties; and •
3. That the in'o POSod roar r:h,ingo is in con f. ..... once with
the existing and pronosed General Plan,
SECTION 2: The Ranr,hn C" mnonna Planning Cmmml^.sion has found that this
projInct will" not goatee a 9ignificao`, adverse i.m,.o,t nn the environment and
w vrends issuance of a ..935 ve D"claration on C,wrTer 12. 1930.
NOW, THERUORE, 6E IT RESOLVED:
1. chat pur <unnt to Section 65n50 to 65855 of the
California Government Cn.i,r. rhdt the Planninq
(7mm.ission of the City of N.5,, Cucamonga hereby
rer.rn•.u:lpnds approval on rho 12th rliy of MOVelnbeh,
In: ". Zone Ch,n..o 'b. :n -l:
�. 'Ir aoun:il al1'r "'• - - ..,:_. i.ane�Cracge
?. a err'ified "f tai: 4:sola'rnn and related
m,n'.,r i.il hoTeh7 idnvtod by 'ho Plannioq Crnmrission
APPROV10 Id;i) Alr,Pllir THVI Rill OAf OF 1750. •
PLNN1 @; E.Di I:;ISSIfo'; ;R" TI!!. Cli',' !lf dA1!CfiO CII(',Aftnl7��1
�i chard Bahl, Chairman
ATTEST:
Seu'e[ary of the Planning lbnniissimr
I, JAR: LNI, Soci ark of the Planningl Co'; 111 Ili en of the City Of Ra TIC 'n0
Cucamonna, do herell certify that the forowing Pesnlnl inn wag duly and
regularly inUT&V vd, pas .ed, and adopted by the PI:n"inn Commission of
He City of Ruchn Eucam qa at a regular meetinq of file Pliminq Commission
held on the l2th !lay of Movemb ?r, IND. by the 511c'who vote to-wit:
AYES: CnpHS51(1tlEf�,S: King, Tolstoy, Rc,n`el, Scoranl.a
NOES: COB:IISSI!NIR -,; bone
ABSENT: Cnt!tj155I0 "CRS: Dahl
A
•
I`1
•
1 s'�
ORDINANCE N0. 191
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 202- 032 -71 FROM A -1 TO R -2 LOCATED WEST
OF BERYL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MIGNONETTE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
following a public hearing held in the tire and manner
prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property
hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a
public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law
as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
'C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
• SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
A -V (Limited Agriculture) to R -2 (Multiple family residential)
Said property is located west of Beryl on the south side of Mignonette,
known as Assessor's Parcel No. 202- 032 -71.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shallcuse the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The DaiL.- Report. a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontarfo, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ASSENT:
Phillip f D. Schlosser, 1.layor
• ATTi.:T:
Lauren I•I. Wasserman, City Clerk
0
•
r �
J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 17, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Vacation of Center Avenue
In late July of this year, Data Design Laboratories, in conjunct
with industrial subdivision Tract No. 11428, requested vacation
six'(6) feet of existing eleven (11) foot parkway along Center
Avenue between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Current
City standard allows a five (5) foot parkway for industrial sub-
divisions where no sidewalks are required.
During the early hearing process the Council had requested that
assurances be obtained to guarantee the maintenance of a dense
landscape buffer between the industrial uses on the east side of
Center Avenue and the residential uses on the west.
Staff has contacted Data Design regarding this concern and out-
lined their concurrence to enter into a maintenance agreement
which would guarantee the maintenance of landscaping within the
current right -of -way area. This agreement is attached for your
review and has been executed by Data Design with a $500 deposit
being posted as security.
The proposed maintenance agreement would insure maintenance of
landscaping within the eleven foot parkway area, however, the
vacation of the six feet would limit the City's opportunities
to create or enhance a buffer in the future. The existence of
the eleven foot parkway strip would provide the City with the
most latitude for future construction options, however, would be
inconsistent with previous right -of -way requirements on indus-
trial development where sidewalks were not required.
ALTERNATIVES
Deny the vacation request and retain the eleven foot parkway.
If this alternate is selected, it would be suggested that
the Council direct Staff to enforce a policy of obtaining
full parkway dedication on industrial property abutting
residential uses.
137
STAFF REPORT
Vacation of Center Avenue
December 17, 1980
Page 2
Grant the vacation request with the approved maintenance
agreement. This alternative would involve the execution
of the attached resolution of vacation.
Respectfully supmitted,
LBH: jaa
Attachments
131?
•
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ORDERING TO BE
VACATED. A PORTION OF CENTER AVENUE As SHOVN ON MAP NO. .: -008
ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 80 -75, passed on August 6, 19a0, the
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate
a portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and
set the hour of 7:00 pm on September 17, 1980, in the Community Services
Building located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the
time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation;
and
WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place,
and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation;
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
as follows:
SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds from all the evidence sub-
mitted that a portion of Center Avenueis unnecessary for present or pros-
pective street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vaca-
ting the portion of said City street as shown on Map No. V -008 on file in
the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been fur -
then 3e sc ri hed in a lecal descric:iom whim is attacnea hereto, marked
Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part thereof.
SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reserva-
tions and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities.
SECTION 3: The Clerk shall cause a certifed copy of this resolution
to he recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County,
California.
SECTION 4: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
APPROVED AND PASSED this _ day of
AYU':
NOES:
Ars €aT:
PnilT_)P U. Scnlosser, :'ayor
ATTEST:
Lauren f•1. Wasserman, City clerk
5F 137
1950,
__n JUU ENGINEERlm, City Of ttnn io c:ncm'cnit•n .. o
SURVEYING COMPANY, INC. -- o+r Jul., 1't 1900
ltl P.ra foolndl groa - - - - -_ �r
C'dL
Rnno. C��nynu ouuirno4 Lcc_!lacaLica,— '•Pr- 1]lal___ •cc fro.
9101
Ili t.•, brat description is for the vnrat.i On of the En -trrly six fret. or Center Avenue
along the vat, Design Property, Presently being developed as Tract 11428, unrecorded.
The F.nsL (r, 00 (cc[ of thr, Vert 10,00 ru.,' of the Ecu Lh ],: Pl,lh feet of the
Nor'.h 1,i81.111 foot of I,nt llmnlmr A, according to tthr map n( gynrt 2202, as
per plat. rccnrdci, in honk 71, of mnps, ragas 67 nad -
nardiuo COWILy, Calirornin, i+, records of San Per-
( 0.18 acres)
THERE ARE NO RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS FOR THIS STREET VACATION
Ll
1�
IY
IN
CITY OF
RANCI 10
HEMLOCK
is
ASHFORD
:-11
NORWICK
EFFEN
ii LA
L
DORSET
is
STAFFORO
--I
CUCI\,Nl()N,(;,\
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Il LN 1:
lllLC: t�4p — V -008
FNI IMI I': su\Ix: N"T.S.
s7v 141
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND
DATA DESIGN CORPORATION FOR THE CONTINUAL MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING LANDSCAPE
AND IRRIGATION ON CENTER AVENUE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That this agreement is made and entered
into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and DATA DESIGN
CORPORATION, hereinafter referred to as OWNER being owners of Assessor's Parcel
No. 208 - 211 -11.
WITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, owner has requested approval by the
City of a street vacation for Center Avenue between Church Street and Foothill
Boulevard, on the East side; and
WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said
developer prior to granting the final approval of the vacation; and
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of maintenance security
as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be
equivalent to orior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing
• said approvai;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the owner
as follows:
1. The owner hereby agrees to maintain, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer, at owner's expense all landscape and irrigation improvements
existing on the East side of Center Avenue 11 feet wide from 900 feet
to 3,080 feet North of Foothill Blvd. from the data hereof.
2. The term of this agreement shall be in perpetuity, commencing on the
date of execution hereof by the City, unless voided by Council action.
3. If the owner fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this
agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said
provisions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to
recover from said security and /or owner the full cost and expense
incurred in so doing. Owner hereby agrees to make such restitution
and to return used portions of said security to City within 30 days
of written notice by City. Should owner fail to comply, then a lien
against said owner's land shall be filed with the County by said City
for said restitution.
4. The maintenance security to be furnished by the owner to guarantee
completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the
approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said security
shall be not less than the amount shown below:
MAINTENANCE SECURITY SUBMITTED: Agent Principal Amount
Cash -Trust Owner $500
11
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these present to be
fuly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the
dates set forth opposite their signatures:
OWNER (NOTARIZE)
BY:
DATE:
BY: DATE:
WITNESS: DATE:
BY
ATTEST:
DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA
a municipal corporation
143
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
•
r1
U
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C,�IcAAIOV
MEMORANDUM
• 0
F_
December 9, 1980
1977
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department
Subject: Project Esperanza: Mid -Year Budget Request
Armando Navarro, Executive Director, National Institute for
Community Development, has submitted a mid -year request for
additional funding for Project Esperanza. The attached Program
Summary and Proposed Budget are prepared by N.I.C.D. to support
that request.
The previously mentioned Proposed Budget attachment does not,
however, clearly define the new "additional" dollars requested;
in that it is first computed on the Federal Fiscal Year rather
than the Municipal Fiscal Year, and second, it duplicates items
that have already been funded by the current City Budget. Therefore,
• it has been restructured by this writer to conform to our Fiscal Year
and to breakout currently budgeted costs from "new" ones. The following
table is the result of that restructuring.
Currently Budgeted 80 -81 ,
Project Manager Salary Reimbursement to N.I.C.D. . . . . . . . . . $11,000
Project Manager Fringe Reimbursement to N.I.C.D. . . . . . . . . . 1,210
Support services (facility rent, utilities, telephone -
charges, maintenance supplies, office supplies, mileage
reimbursement, postage costs, liability insurance, and
copying costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 240
21,450
Proposed Mid -Year Additions (January - June)
Recreation Coordinator, 1/2 time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E 3,348
Recreation Coordinator, Fringe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369
Executive Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600
Executive Director, Fringe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Recreation Supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500
Accounting Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
5,283
Total 80 -81 Allocation Request 26,733
(continued to page 2)
page 2
memo 12/9/80
re: Project Esperanza
For Council's information, a historical review of the financial
relationship between N.I.C.D. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is
as follows:
Fiscal Commitment by City to N.I.C.D.
1977 -78: Recreation Supplies only . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,000
1978 -79: Recreation Supplies only . . . . . 2,670
1979 -80: Facility rental, utilities, telephone charges,
maintenance supplies, office supplies, mileage
reimbursement, postage expenses, liability insurance
and copying costs . . . . 7,600
1980 -81: Full time Project Manager plus all of the above
from 1979 -80 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $21,450
* Federal Summer Youth Recreation Program funds passed through H.O.Y. by
City. No direct cost to City other than administering funds.
Council Options
•
1) Grant full request
2) Grant partial request •
3) Defer request to be considered as a part of the normal budgetary process.
Staff Recommendation
The following recommendation is not based on the merits of N.I.C.D.'s Project
Esperanza. Council has reviewed the program of N.I.C.D. previously and through
Council action directed that it is appropriate for the City to support Esperanza's
endeavors.
It would, however, be Staff's recommendation that Council exercise Option 3 cited
above for the following reasons:
1) It gives Council opportunity to view and evaluate the City's Program
of Services as a whole, including N.I.C.D. and all "other" Community
Based Organizations' proposed program of service and to prioritize
the limited resources available to meet that Citywide Program of
Services; and,
2) It more clearly defines the scope and impact of a budget request.
For example, this particular mid -year request of $5283 when viewed
in the regular budget cycle becomes in reality $10,566,for an annual
commitment by the City to N.I.C.D, of $32,016 at todays cost.
If I can answer any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Thank you.
l�
0
}INational Institute for Community Development
Dr. ,lrmando ,Navarro
�> EXCCIINUe Director
PdOScG^ ES?�.:AZi74 T47 W. 2nd Street -
San Bernardino. CA 92410
714. 888.0207
DESCRIPTION AND PROJECTED EMP; -IASIS 1991
Y.
(ercerot Front 193C Project _Ts:eranza united ;at prcoosal)
.. Project Bsperanza is oriented towards deve lO Cing a multi-
. service center in the :iOrth :Own area of Rancho '_uca *.onga. =hc
primary objective of Project _soeranza is to crovi3e rea`ional
activitie_ rd social Services for'purcoses o__ iga`iny the
vaIloua social orOble9S plagUiny^ the coTmunity's G:rrio, in
^'
particular, the problems of gang violence and juvenile delinquency.
A -hit = - a recreation program (Project .ioy an3 Proirct ]sp_ranza)
under the :rational Institute for Communi *_y Develocnent has ooer ?,tad
k in north Town for only three years, it has alrea''.y receive-1 t:: ^e
: sooport of the Sheriff's Decar'tment (see attarn ^A article), 3c`OOl
` 30ard members, and Other city and county officials. Ourin7 the oast
year, an increasing n'.:.mber of youth have particicate' in Project
csperanza's recreational oro;ect, --uring the school year,
acproxi- ate'•, to:en_y yout ^. per
f , ,isa Sspa_ -n "3's facilities = --'
• equipment for activities sic- as'ping -pong, YSOCCer, baSiCntba 1J, 3n3
volleyball.
Project Bsgeranza also sponsors the 31=^ ear 'irut;, Recreation
Program for youths aged 7 to 17. This su.,tmer an averaga of s_ig'r. -L-
eight (3 -7) youth oarticinate` daily. Project Gsperanza Staff
coordinated sports activities, arts and crafts, and field trios.
Project 3soeranza youth participate in the Summer Junior Cly- ice,
competing elith ':iarrio youth, from Los Olives in ::plan3. In addiri on,
field trips were taken to places such as ;,iagic i•iountain, Disnsyla ^.9,
2usti Per Los Angeles Zoo, ate.
Project Ssperanza will e, -panel its recreational crogr3m in the
upcoming year. In addition to conti.'iuin7 with the afore- entioned
activities , emphae_is will be placed on a more comcrahensiva and
e;:panded rac:reational orogram. Inclisded will 'ce coed sports nrcgra-+.,
art and crafts, fief trips , an:! a film series. _ l,.rou.,1; tire-
programs, Project :sceranza will be in a position to cromote vcutf,
leadership, discicline, r_sponsi'aility =_n :J tcanwor::. ;n partir,; lap,
the sports progr will serve to redirect the aner7y an3 17 r =scion
of ^_..e you•:h in the targeted nrai in orfer to ccrt =.i1 t.._ orOble -s
Of gana violence and juvenile delinquency.
Speci`_ically,, Project Gaperanza dill nccomclish its goals
';i evelocia! a be :ring pro.ram and roes so`tba11 t_ -.s as wa'1 as
of ^er snorts. The city Of'-Rancho Cucamonga !.as donete.' soccer ba11s
an ping oonc eceinment to the crojOct. In addition, the .:ucaionga
school district 'nas made their outdoor facilities at t'ns .;id.le
Iv
P cont'l
„r
cont'd page IV
School available to Project Esperanza participants. This will enable •
Project Esperanza to expand its sports activities to include tennis,
handball, and football.
With the help of a donation from Mayor Schlosser, and through fund
raising activitles,Project Esperanza is organizing a Boy Scout Troop.
to a
In the area of social services, project Esperanza personnel will
seek to maximize the availability of social services to the residents
of the targeted area and secondly, to educate the residents as to how
to utilize the existing services. By accomplishing the preceding, the
quality of life will be improved. Specifically, Project Esperanza
will maintain and expand its services in the following areas:
Social Security: During 1979 and 1980, approx. 5 people per month were
assisted in various problems related to Social Security. Most of
these problems were accident or employment related. These achievements
represent ;1550 per month in reimbursement to community people.
Workmen's Comoensation: Three to five people per month were assisted
with workmans comp. They have received $3500 in compensation through
the efforts of Ssperanza personnel.
Welfare Services: More than 20 persons per month have been assisted in
this area. Project Esperanza personnel provide information to each
person and escort him/her to public offices to receive aid. Personnel
from the Welfare and iealth Department have lectured at the site about
the services they provide.
Inmi- ration: Officers from the Immigration and :iaturalization Service •
and the ,Mexican Consul have visited the site to give community people
the opoortunity to ask questions regarding assistance and service. More
than 20 persons per month were assisted with paper work related to
immigration.
Internretine /translation: Each month between 15 and 20 persons, particular.
Hispanic, were assisted with the interoretation of public and private
documents. In some cases, when necessary, persons were escorted by
Project Esperanza staff to public offices for additional assistance.
While Project Esperanza has provided a beneficial recreational
program in the past, the addition of an experienced recreation
coordinator and expanded recreational programs for the youth will help
create the feelings of community pride and self - sufficiency.
•
•
•
i
_IATIC.IAL I.7L'TITOT3 FOR CC :"-AUdITf vu "'JCLC ?;'iadTT
P7C?OJiD 30DGSr 307 PROJ3C'r c'
F-]RALIZA
10/1/80- 9/30/81
i
x
,
ADM IISTRATI08:
Rent (250x12)
;3,000.00
Phone (110 x 12)
$1,320.00
Utilities (120 x 12)
$1,440.00
'
Insurance (liablitl)
$1,500.00
Recreation (equipment /arts
31,000.00
and crafts)
Office Supplies
$ 480.00
Gas %llowance
$ 200.00
:accountant (50 x 12)
; 000.00
Miscellanaous (film rental etc.)
$__290.00
TOTAL $ 9,740.00
PZISO7Ki3L:
Recreation Coordinator '.p 3,505.00
(half -time; 3 /l /dl- 9/30/31
w 558 x7 )
d ?rime $ 430.00
.sxecutive Director $1,200.00
(part time; (100 x 12)
j ?rinje ¢ 132.00
'rOTIL ;5,6•a8.00
3n \:;D ;OT %L $15,a03.00
i
City Of
RANCHO
December 2, 1980 CUCAMONGA
Armando Navarro, Executive Director
National institute for Community Development
747 W. 2nd Street
San Bernardino, CA 92410
Dear Dr. Navarro:
In studying your funding proposal, I first took the liberty of restructuring
the time frame covered in your submittal from the Federal Fiscal Cycle
(October - September) to the Municipal Fiscal Cycle (July - June). Second,
I broke out cost currently covered by the City's 3udget and calculated the
additional amount of new funds requested. The following information is the
result of those two actions:
Currently Budget 80 -81
Project Manager Salary Reimbursement to N.I.C.D. . . . . . . . . . . $11,000
Project Manager Fringe Reimbursement to N.I.C.D. . . . . . . 1,210
Support Services (facility rent, utilities, telephone charges,
maintenance supplies, office supplies, :mileage reimbursement, •
postage costs, liability insurance, and copying costs) . . . . . . 9,240
$21,450
Proposed Mid -Year Additions (January - June
Recreation Coordinator, 172 time . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . $ 3,348
Recreation Coordinator, Fringe . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 369
Executive Director . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 600
Executive Director, Fringe . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 66
Recreation Supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . Soo
Accounting Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 300
Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 100
$ 5,283
Total 80 -81 Allocation Request $26,733
Your request will be scheduled for City Council review at the meeting of
December 17, 1980, 7:00 p.m., at Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Base Line
Road, Rancho Cucamonga.
If you wish to discuss the information above or add any new support information
for Council consideration to that previously submitted, let me know by December 10.
Thank you.
Cor ial1Y, 1 •
1 am L Holl�e
y, Dire or
Community Services Oe' \p \ar ment 111
POST OFFICE nOA 7 3 R: \WHO CUC;AMONG,A, `r ALIFORNIA 91730 (714) 989 -1851
r7
u
rI
L—J
« • «. • llwmt
December 12, 1980
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Proposed Special State -Wide Election of June 2, 1981
To Determine the Fate of the Peripheral Canal
Assemblyman Ross Johnson and Senator Reuben Ayala have recently intro-
duced legislation calling for a special state -wide election on
June 2, 1981, to determine the fate of the Peripheral Canal. This
urgency legislation (AB 9) would call a state -wide election to provide
for the "submission to the voters of the state at such election the
Water Facilities Referendum Statute as qualified on October 16, 1980,
making an appropriation therefore, and calling an election, to take
effect imnediately ".
As Council is probably aware, a referendum to bar construction of the
Peripheral Canal has qualified for the ballot. If the referendum
qualifies, no work can begin on the canal until the electorate decides
its fate, delaying the project for up to 18 months.
Therefore, staff would recommend that Council express its support for
AB 9 (Johnson and Ayala), calling for a special state -wide election
on June 2, 1981 to determine the fate of the Peripheral Canal. As
Assemblyman Johnson has pointed out, without the canal,Southern Cali-
fornia will need extra time to develop alternative water supplies with
the impending loss of Colorado River Water,
LMW /JR /vz
15e)
CALIFORNIA LECISLATUHE- 1981-02 REGULAR SESSION
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 9
�IIIIt
Introduced by Assemblyman Johnson
(Coauthor: Senator Ayala)
C
December 1, 1980
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS AND REAPPORTIONMENT
•
An act calling an election to be conducted on June 2, 1981,
and to provide for the submission to the voters of the state at
such election the Water Facilities Referendum Statute, as
C
qualified on October 16, 1990, making an appropriation
therefor, and calling an election, to take effect immediately.
-�'
LEGISLATIVE COUNSELS DICF_ST
AR 9, as introduced, Johnson (Elec. & Reap.). Special
election: referendum.
This bill would call an election to be held throughout the
state on June 2, 1981.
It would require the submission of the Water Facilities
Referendum Statute to be submitted to the voters at such
election.
Section 2231 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires
the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for
costs mandated by the state. The section also specifies the
manner for paying the reimbursement and requires any
statute mandating the costs to contain an appropriation to pay
for the costs in the initial fiscal year. This statutory provision
was supplemented by a constitutional requirement of
reimbursement effective for statutes enacted on or after Judy
•
1, 1980.
This bill appropriates an unspecified sum to the Controller
, �,
I 5 1 99 40 AMMON
AB 9 —2—
for allocation and disbursement to local agencies and school
districts for costs mandated by the state and incurred by them
pursuant to this act.
This bill would take effect immediately as an act calling an
election.
Vote: ' /a. Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes-
State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows
1 SECTION 1. An election is hereby called to be held
2 throughout the state on the 2nd day of June 1981.
3 There shall be submitted to the voters at such election
4 the following question:
5 "Shall Senate Bill 200, a.: enacted by the Legislature
6 during the 1979 -80 Regular Session, and signed by the
7 Governor as Chapter 632 of the Statutes of 1980, relating
8 to water, become law ?"
9 The special election provided for in this act shall be
10 proclaimed, held, conducted, the ballots shall be
I I prepared, marked, collected, counted and canvassed and
12 the results shall be ascertained and the returns thereof
13 made in all respects in accordance with the provisions of
14 the Constitution applicable thereto and the law
* 15 governing general elections insofar as provisions thereof
16 are applicable to the election provided for in this act.
17 SEC. 2. The sum of dollars ($ ) is
18 hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the
19 Controller for allocation and disbursement to local
20 agencies and school districts pursuant to Section 2231 of
21 the Revenue and Taxation Code to reimburse them for
22 costs mandated by the state and incurred by them
23 pursuant to this act.
24 SEC. 3. This act calls an election within the meaning
25 of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 8 of Article
26 1 V of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.
O
) � z 99 W
•
l\
•w;FM.. .�4w�u -.o. , - -,:qty ., ;.. ,a ..
l J
1501 NO. HAR0031MIIVA10, SOI11101
STATE CAVITCI A FULLERTON. CAMORNIA91635
9A
SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNIA 11 STA �G" (]IA)]0b56il
(916) 464416
December 4, 1980
ASSEMBLYMAN ROSS JOHNSON
Hon. Phillip chlosser SI%TY.NINTH DISTRICT
P ORANGE COUNTY
Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga
7874 Buena Vista Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Dear Mayor Schlosser: '
0
is
I recently introduced urgency legislation calling for a special
statewide election on June 2, 1981, to decide the fate of the
Peripheral Canal.
The referendum to bar construction of the Peripheral Canal has
qualified for the ballot. Californians are scheduled to vote on
the question at the June, 1982 election. The legislation (SB 200),
authorizing the construction of the 43 -mile canal, was to become
effective January 1, 1981. However, with the success of the
qualification of the referendum, no work can begin on the canal
until the electorate decides its fate, leaving the canal in limbo
for the next 18 months.
Continued delay on this vital project jeopardizes the well -being of
millions of Californians. Without the canal, Southern California will
not have a reliable water supply after the cutoff of Colorado River
water. If the canal is blocked by the voters, Southern California
will desperately need extra time to locate and develop alternative
water supplies,
On the other side of the question, if the canal gets the green light,
waiting that extra time will result in much higher construction costs.
It is estimated that delaying the canal construction for one year
will increase the cost by $90 million.
The Secretary of State's Office estimates that a special election
would cost around $12 million. The only municipal elections scheduled
for June 2, 1981 are in Salinas and Compton.
Any support that your city could give to the passage of this legislation
would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
�lJ��� ,�
ROSS S9N
RJ: gg
Enclosure
��3
•
9
CITY 01' RA\C110 CI_'(A \10 \G,\
ME,N10RANUUM
DATE: December 11, 1980 vl-
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
SUBJECT: Equestrian /Hiking Trails on Flood Control Right -of -flay
ABSTRACT: This memo discusses the recent position taken by the San
Bernardino County Flood Control District relative to equestrian /hiking
trails on Flood Control right -of -way. Recommendation that the City
Council adopt the attached Resolution and direct staff to inform the
Board of Supervisors of the City Council's position.
DISCUSSION: Recently, in the investigation of the conditions for ap-
proval for an equestrian tract within the area north of Banyan, Plan-
ning staff contacted San Bernardino County Flood Control District to
find out whether or not Flood Control right -of -way could be used as
an equestrianMi king trail. Mine Galli, the Federal Projects coordi-
nator at San Bernardino County, informed the staff, that under no
circumstances could the Flood Control right -of -way be used for eques-
trian /hiking trail purposes.
The proposed Master Plan of Trails indicates many of the master -plan-
ned facilities to be on Flood Control right -of -ways. It is vitally
important for the future planning of trails within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga that we have precise determination from the San Bernardino
County Flood Control district for the use of the Flood Control right -
of -way for trail purposes. It seems wasteful and self - serving for
the right -of -ways of the Flood Control channels to be under utilized.
The attached Resolution indicates the Council's desire to have eques-
trian /hiking trails on the Flood Control right -of -ways within the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended
attached Resolution and direct the
the Mayor's signature, forwarding
County Board of Supervisors asking
of the Flood Control right -of -ways
Respectfully, SLA mitted,
i
�'7
BARRY Y,: HOGAN
CI T Y,, PLAIN ER
DY,u: ik
Attach.
that the City Council adopt the
staff to prepare a letter for
the Resolution to the San Bernardino
for their cooperation in the use
for equestrian /hiking trail purposes.
)Sq
RESOLUTION N0. 80 -115
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXPRESSING CONCERN
AND DESIRE FOR THE USE OF FLOOD CONTROL RIGHT -
OF -WAYS FOR EQUESTRIAN/HIKING TRAIL PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga contains numerous
equestrians and horses; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has areas specifically
designed for the keeping of horses; and
WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga has a Master Plan of Trails Element; and
WHEREAS, it is the City's strong desire to implement the Master
Plan Trails system when adopted,
NO'rl, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY DECLARE THAT:
1. It is our strong intent and desire to provide equestrian/
hiking trails within the Flood Control right -of -way.
2. That the City Council believes that the use of right -of -way
• for equestrian trail purposes is an appropriate use and
will not infringe upon the use of the right -of -way for
maintenance purposes.
3. That the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga have
expressed their desire for the City to plan and provide
enuestrian /hiking trails for the enjoyment of the citizens
of Rancho QlCarionna.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of December, 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
• Lauren bt. Nasscrman, City Clerk
Ph il�p D. Schlosser, I•tayor
155
ORDER OF PROCEDURE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI-40MGA
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1
(6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA)
DATE OF 14EETING:
December 17, 1980 at 7:OD p.m.
STAFF:
Present proposed boundary map, generally
showing the following:
a. Boundaries of proposed assessment
district;
b. Extent of works of improvements.
CITY COUNCIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROPOSED
BOUNDARY MAP. -
CITY COUNCIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION DESIGNATING PERSONS.
.
CITY COUNCIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION COVERING PRELI ^UNARY
DETERMINATION.
STAFF:
Present debt report pursuant to Division
4 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California.
STAFF:
Summarize method and formula of assessment
spread.
CITY COUNCIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION APPROVING REPORT AND
SETTING PUBLIC HEARING [Proposed Public
Hearing Date January 21, 1981).
is
163
RESOLUTION NO. �t'o- '16
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO COCAMONGA ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE
• GENERAL NATURE, LOCATION AND EXTENT OF THE
CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS OF IMPROVE-
MENT AND SHOWING THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED FOR CERTAIN
COSTS AND EXPENSES OF SAID IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, there has been received and presented, a map showing the .
general nature, location and extent of the proposed improvement
work, and also designating and describing the boundaries of the
area proposed to be assessed in an assessment district under the
provisions and authority of the "Municipal Improvement Act of
1913 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California; said assessment district is known and desig-
nated as
ASSESS'NT DISTRICT NO.. 79 -1
(6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District ").
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• CALIFORNIA, AS FOL=15:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That a map of the Assessment District showing the
general nature, location, and extent of the pro-
posed public improvement work, and also showing
and describing the boundaries of the proposed
Assessment District and lands and property to be
specifically assessed to pay all the costs and
expenses of the proposed improvements designated
as PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1
is hereby submitted, and the same is hereby app-
roved and adopted.
SECTIO`! 3. That the original map of said proposed boundaries
of the Assessment District, and one copy thereof,
is to be filed in the office of the City Clerk,
and a copy thereof in the Office of the designated
Superintendent of Streets.
SECTION A. That the City Clerk is directed to endorse on the
original and on at least one copy of the map of
the Assessment District as herein referred to, a
certificate evidencing the date and adoption of
this Resolution, and is further directed to file
1�v
the original of such in their office and within
fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolu- •
tion fixing the time and place of the hearing on
the formation or extent of said Assessment District,
a copy of said map shall be filed with the correct
and proper endorsements thereon with the County
Recorder, all in the manner and form provided for in
Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
166-
MAYOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
•
RESOLUTION NO. OL/
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
• RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGNATING PERSONS TO PERFORM
VARIOUS DUTIES FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS
WHEREAS, this City Council is, at this time, considering the for-
mation of a special assessment district and this City, pursuant to
the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of
1913 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California, for the construction of certain public works
of improvement, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work,
said assessment district to be known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1
(6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "); and,
WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous of making the
required appointments and designating persons to perform certain
duties, in order to allow the proceedings to go forward to completion
in accordance with the provisions of law.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
• CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
0
SECTION 2. That LLOYD B. HUBBS, is hereby appointed to perform all
duties and functions of the Superintendent of Streets
as said duties are specified and designated in the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, for the above referenced assessment district.
SECTION 3. That the place for recordation of the assessment roll
and diagram shall be in the Office of the Superintendent
of Streets and said assessment roll and diagram, upon
recordation, shall be kept as a permanent record of the
City.
SECTION 4. That the DAILY REPORT is hereby designated as the news-
paper for all publications as required by law and as
necessary for completion of this Assessment District.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this , day of
MAYOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CITY OF RANCHO CUG4IONGA
1 �(-;7
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA COVERING PRELIMINARY DETERMIN-
ATION AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT
ON SAID IMPROVEMENT
• THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That certain public works of improvement, together with
appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection there-
with, including acquisition where necessary, are pro-
posed to be done and made within the boundaries of a
proposed assessment district; said assessment district
known and designated as
ASSESSi1ENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1
(6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District").
In connection therewith, said City Council finds and
determines as follows:
A. That the specific nature of the proposed works
of improvement consist of all of the work. as
• generally shown on the map previously approved
relating to the proposed boundaries for the
Assessment District.
B. That the boundaries of the Assessment District
lands proposed to be assessed co pay the costs
and expenses of said proposed work and improve-
ments are as shorn upon a :sap of said Assessment
District, which map has been heretofore approved
by this City Council and is on file in the Office
of the'.City Clerk. Said map shall govern for all
details as to the extent on said Assessment
District.
SECTION 2. That the statute under which it is proposed that the
proceedings will be conducted will be the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
SECTION 3. That this proposed improvement is referred to
LLOYD D.HUBBS, the Appointed Superintendent of Streets
who is hereby appointed and required to procure all
necessary information to prepare a report on the pro-
posed improvement in the manner and form provided for
in Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California, the "Special Assessment Investi-
gation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 ".
�5�
SECTION 4.
That this Resolution and the Report as ordered
herein are pursuant to the provisions of the •
"Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and
Majority Protest Act of 1931 ", being Division 4 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California.
SECTION 5.
That said Report, pursuant to Division 4, shall
have attached to it, a copy of this Resolution,
upon its adoption, with the Clerk's Certificate
showing the date and vote for said approval.
SECTION 6.
That this legislative body does, at this time, in-
tend to make a contribution towards certain of the
costs and expenses of the works of improvement, as
proposed under these proceedings. Said contribution
shall generally be as follows:
Prepaid fees in the amount of $54,614.00
shall be appropriated from the CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAINAGE FUND.
SECTION 7.
The works of improvements, as proposed for these
proceedings consists of the construction of certain
grading, clearing and grubbing, paving, storm
drain improvements, together with appurtenances •
and appurtenant work in connection therewith in
portions of 6TH STREET AND OTHER STREETS in a
special assessment district within the incorporated
limits of the City, said assessment district
designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1. For
particulars, reference is made to the Exhibit
attached hereto, referenced and so incorporated.
APPROVED and
ADOPTED this day of
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA •
I ✓ v
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1
• 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
•
•
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The general description of work consists of the construction of certain grading,
clearing and grubbing, asphalt concrete paving, aggregate bese, and storm
drains including all appurtenances and appurtenant work, including acqui-
sition of all rights -of -way and easements necessary to accomplish the above
improvements to the specified widths and dimensions and all said work and
acquisition is located in all or a portion of the following listed streets or
easements and as shown on the proposed boundary map (reduced) included
herein:
Streets - 2 -Lane Divided
Two 12 -foot AC /AB travel lanes, separated by a 16 -foot unimproved
median, with a 6 -foot AC shoulder on the outside of each lane and
appurtenances thereto:
6th Street: From Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue, a distance of
approximately 9050 feet.
Milliken Avenue: from 4th Street to 7th Street, a distance of approxi-
mately 3990 feet.
Streets - 2 -Lane Undivided
Two 13 -toot AC /AB travel lanes with a 6 -foot AC shoulder on each side
and appurtenances thereto:
Cleveland Avenue: From approximately 600 feet north of 41h Street
to approximately 600 feet south of 6th Street, a distance of
6
approximately 1930 feet (east side only) and 2 lanes from ap- •
proximately 600 feet south of 6th Street to 7th Street, a distance
of approximately 1220 feet.
New Rochester Avenue: From 4th Street to 6th Street, a distance
of approximately 2650 feet.
Storm Drain System and Appurtenances
Line SC: Commencing at the SBCFCD Channel (Deer Creek) approxi-
mately 500 feet west of Center Avenue, thence easterly in Arrow
Route to its terminus, a distance of approximately 6010 feet.
Line 5D: Commencing at the SBCFCD Channel (Deer Creek) approxi-
mately 600 feet west of Center Avenue, thence easterly in 6th
Street to approximately 800 feet east of Haven Avenue, thence
northerly in a 20 -foot easement parallel to and approximately
800 feet east of Haven Avenue to the north side of the AT & SF
Railway, thence easterly in a 20 -foot easement parallel and ad-
jacent to the AT & SF Railway to its terminus at Vincent Avenue,
a total distance of approximately 8900 feet. •
Line 7E: Commencing in Cleveland Avenue at 4th Street, thence
northerly in Cleveland Avenue to 6th Street, thence easterly in
6th Street to its terminus at Milliken Avenue, a distance of
approximately 4660 feet. _
Line 19A: Commencing in 4th Street approximately 1600 feet east of
Milliken, thence northwesterly and northerly in a 20 -foot ease-
ment to 6th Street, thence westerly in 6th Street to Pittsburgh
Avenue, thence northerly in Pittsburgh Avenue to the terminus
of Pittsburgh Avenue, thence northerly in a 20 -foot easement to
its terminus at the northerly side of the AT & SF Railway right -
of -way, a total distance of approximately 5125 feet.
Line 19D: Commencing in Rochester Avenue at State Highway Route 31,
thence continuing northerly in Rochester Avenue to the northerly
side of the AT & SF Railway right -of -way, thence easterly in a
20 -foot easement parallel to and adjacent to the AT & SF Railway
to its terminus approximately 1250 feet west of Rochester Avenue,
a total distance of approximately 4460 feet.
•
7
1W
r �
U
I •
9
Line 19F: Commencing at a proposed 72 -inch RCP (Line 19D) in Roches-
ter Avenue at 6th Street, thence westerly in 6th Street to its ter-
minus, a distance of approximately 1300 feet.
16( 8
IV
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMGONA APPROVING REPORT UNDER THE
"SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION
is AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931 ", AND FIXING
A DATE OF HEARING THEREON
WHEREAS, this Council did on the 17th day of December, 1980
by Resolution No. , order the preparation of a report
under the provisions of the Special Assessment Investigation,
Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931, being Division 4 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in the
matter c£ the construction of certain public works of improvement
in a special assessment district known and designated as
ASSESS'ENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1
(6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "); said public
works of improvement are generally described as follows:
The construction of certain street improvements and
drainage improvements, together with appurtenances and
appurtenant work in portions of 6TH STREET AND OTHER
STREETS within the incorporated limits of the CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAIONGA
and,
WHEREAS, such Report has been prepared and submitted to this City
Council_
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLO:iS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct_
SECTION 2. That the Report for the Assessment District so pre-
pared and presented be, and the same hereby is,
approved, and the fact and date of this approval
shall be endorsed thereon and the Report shall be
filed with the City Clerk.
SECTION! >. THAT THIS CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY FIX THE 21ST
DAY OF JANUARY, 1981 1 AT THE HOUR OF 7 :00 P.M.
LICK CO' ^*,NITY CE✓T_ , 9121 Paseline Road, R.vicho Cuc=nga, AS TPE TLM
AND PLACE W14EN A HEARING ON SAID "REPORT" WILL BE HELD
BY THIS CITY COUNCIL. THE CITY CLERK SHALL GIVE NOTICE
OF SUCH HEARIC:G BY %tNILING A COPY OF THE NOTICE, POST-
AGE PREPAID, TO ALL PERSONS O:vVING REAL PROPERTY WHICH
IS PROPOSED TO HE ASSESSED TO PAY ANY PART OF THE COST
OF THE tiORK, WHOSE NAMES AND ADDRESSES APPEAR ON THE
LAST EQUALIZED .ASSESSMENT ROLL AVAILABLE ON THE DATE
THE REPORT WAS CO ?DIENCED, AT HIS ADDRESS AS SHOWN ON
SUCH ROLL, OR AS KNO:.V TO THE CITY CLERK, ALL IN THE
IIXn FANNER AND FORMA PROVIDED FOR IN SAID DIVISION 4.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of •
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
MAYOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
165
•
•
Cite of
RNNCHO
CUCAN40NGA
December 15, 1980
Eugene Bianchin
6348 Topaz
Alta Loma, Ca. 9170:1.
Dear Mr. Bianchin:
Thank you for your letter concerning a disposal service for
Rancho Cucamonga, The City Council has determined that the
revised refuse ordinance will include a provision requiring
advance payment for billing. The primary reason for this
condition is that in a number of instances people move from
the Community without paying their bills. The advance payment
provides some protection to the refuse companies. The only
alternative I can think of to advance billing would be to
handle the service in much the same manner as many public
utilities, particularly water and publicly operated trash
companies. That would be to require an advance deposit which
would not, I am sure, be in accordance with your philosophical
view. For residents who will be living in the Community for
quite some time, the advance billing should have no substantial
impact. In fact, that is how the service was handled by both
Rancho and Yukon prior to the City granting a franchise for
refuse collection.
Your letter also indicated that City employees would be respon-
sible for collecting delinquent payments for the disposal com-
panies. The City ordinance is set up to require trash collection,
but it makes no requirement that City employees collect any of
the funds. Payments are made directly to the refuse companies.
However, it may be that the City will ultimately have to become
involved in issuing citations to those who choose not to pay the
refuse companies for services rendered.
Continued.....
POST OFFICE. BOX 807 . RANCHO (q CA)IONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 . 714 989.1851
Eugene Branchin
Page Two
December 15, 1980
I assume that you are aware that although the service is
to be mandatory, there are certain conditions under which
you may receive an exemption. The primary alternative
avail ble to you, if you are that dissatisfied with the
service, would be to handle your own refuse disposal. The
City will grant exemptions to those who remove their own
trash at least once every two weeks and it will be necessary
for those who receive an exemption to save their receipts
from the Milliken Landfill;In the event we have problems,
we will want to verify that trash has been disposed of
properly.
In summary, it appears that there is no way to convince you
that the advance payment issue is a relatively minor issue in
view of all of the other problems facing the City, not only
those which relate to trash disposal but other more significant
issues. In my view, you hit the nail on the head when you
stated in your letter that the City Manager and City Attorney
were not appointed to serve as collection agencies for private
businesses. I certainly agree with that statement and I think
your point could be carried somewhat further by indicating
that the services of the City Manager and City Attorney could
best be spent handling the more important long range Community
problems which must be dealt with if Rancho Cucamonga is to
be one of California's outstanding Communities.
I am sorry you disagree with the City Council's position.
Naturally, you may address the City Council of your concerns.
You may also be assured that the Council will receive a copy
of your letter.
Sincerely,
auren M. Wasserman
City Manager
LMW /v2
CC/ City Council
%� +1
/� / /�O u
� / � � /
/� i
� � � �_ � � i
i i /
/�� i
i / /
'� � /
,�' �
��
� � . � i ,
� /
r %
'�
/ � /
/ i � i,
�,� � / • i i
/ / � �/ �
1 � , /
i � / ` i
•/ '
i /, �
i�� / /
/ _ i : - �� /
/ i
.' �/ i
J / /
- . 1. 71- �
_. s�'�- sac � ._ __ -
MEMORANDUM Goo c,
s
F
December 17, 1980 1977
TO: City Manager and Members of the City Council
FROM: Assistant City Manager4viR_
SUBJECT: Adoption of Refuse Ordinance 132 and Rate Resolution 80 -120
Ordinance No. 132 incorporates all of the language of the original
refuse ordinance 117, as well as the Council directed modifications
outlined in 117 -A, which was included in the original Council packet.
Resolution 80 -120 provides a mechanism to establish (1) a residential
refuse rate, (2) a senior citizen's rate, and (3) a penalty for
non - payment.
Residential Rate
Council has recommended that refuse rates be rolled back to the original
monthly rate of $5.50 and that a unviersal rate be established through-
out the Community.
Senior Citizen Rate
In a recent staff survey, it was found that there are only two
cities that currently offer a senior citizen's rate. These include
Claremont and Ontario. Claremont provides a $10.00 /year reduction in
refuse rates and Ontario offers a 5% reduction.
If Council elects to establish a senior citizen's rate, staff would
recommend that the reduction be expressed as percentage in dollars.
For example, a 25% reduction would be $1.00 off the rolled back rate
or a 12!;% reduction would be .50 off the proposed rate.
Penalty for Non - Payment
At our last meeting, Council expressed a concern that a 100% non- payment
penalty was excessive. Staff would request direction from Council as
to a recommended penalty payment. Penalty payments for City Business
Licenses are currently 50 ".
Continued....
Adoption of Refuse Ordinance 132
and Rate Resolution 80 -120
Page Two
December 17, 1980
In summary, it will be necessary for the Council to accomplish the
following to resolve the Refuse Franchise issue:
✓ 1. Adopt Ordinance 132
2. Adopt Resolution No. 80 -120 and at the same time, establish
~ a refuse rate, senior citizen's rate and penalty for non - payment
rate.
3. Direct staff to forward Franchise Agreements for Refuse Disposal
to Yukon and Rancho Disposal or t eir consideration and coordination
with the City Attorney.
p► 4. Staff would request that Council table the refuse consultant
report for future reference, if Council elects to reconsider
the recent rate increases or future rate increase requests.
�W�. /'
JHR /vz �__�_
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
FOR
REFUSE DISPOSAL NORTHERN SECTION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day
of , 1980, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "City ", and YUKON DISPOSAL, a California
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor ", provides
as follows:
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, heretofore City has duly adopted an ordinance
concerning the collection, removal and disposal of refuse
within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, said ordinance authorizes the City Council of
City to contract with any person, firm or corporation for
the collection, removal and disposal of such refuse from
within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
NOSY, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
and agreements hereinafter contained, the parties hereto
agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 1. REFUSE ORDINANCE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.
All provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Ordinance No.
117, as the same now exists or as it may hereafter be
amended, and all provisions of any other ordinance of the
City which may hereafter be enacted and which in any way
deals with the subject of disposal of refuse from residential
units in the City, hereinafter collectively referred to as
the "Refuse Ordinance ", are hereby incorporated by reference
and made a part of this Agreement as if the same were set
forth herein in full.
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this
Contract, the following words and phrases are defined and
shall be construed as follows, unless it shall be apparent
from the context that a different meaning is intended:
A. "NORTHERN SECTION" shall mean that portion of
the City north of the street of Base Line.
B. "DISPOSE" and "DISPOSAL" shall mean the complete
operation of collecting, treating, transportation and dispos-
ing of accumulations of refuse and the products or residue
-1-
arising from any treatment.
C. "EXCLUDED MATERIALS" shall mean those wastes
and other materials not included in the refuse ordinance
definitions of refuse, garbage, combustible rubbish and non-
combustible rubbish.
SECTION 3. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. The Contractor shall
comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of
the State, County, City and all political subdivisions
thereof having jurisdiction over work done or to be done
under this Contract; the Contractor must conform to and
abide by all ordinances of City and of the County and of
cities through which refuse collected may be hauled or
wherein such refuse may be disposed of.
This Contract, all terms, provisions, conditions and
specifications hereof, and all duties and obligations imposed
hereunder upon the Contractor, his agents, employees and
assigns and all of the rights and privileges of the Contrac-
tor hereunder, shall be subject to and conditioned on the
provisions of such statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations
as the City Council may, from time to time, adopt or make
with respect to collection, removal or disposal of refuse,
with due regard to the financial impact and mutual interest
of the Contractor or the City.
SECTION 4. INDEMNIFICATION AND EXEMPTION FROM LIABILITY.
Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City from and
against any and all claims arising from the conduct of
Contractor's business or from any activity, work or thing
done, permitted or suffered by Contractor in the performance
of this Agreement, and shall further indemnify and hold
harmless City from and against any and all claims arising
from any breach or default in the performance of any obliga-
tions on Contractor's part to be performed under the terms
of this Contract or arising from any negligence of the
Contractor or any of Contractor's agents, officers, contrac-
tors, or employees, and from and against all costs, attor-
neys' fees, expenses and liabilities incurred in the defense
of any such claim or any action or proceeding brought there-
on; and in case any action or proceeding be brought against
City by reason of any such claim, Contractor upon notice
from City shall defend the same at Contractor's expense by
counsel satisfactory to City or City may defend the same and
require payment of attorneys' fees in advance from Contractor.
SECTION 5. DEFAULTS; REMEDIES.
A. DEFAULTS. In addition to anything set forth
specifically herein and referred to as a material default,
the occurrence of any one or more of the following events
shall constitute a material default and breach of this
-2-
Agreement by Contractor:
(1) the failure by Contractor to observe or
perform any of the covenants, conditions or provisions of
this Contract to be observed or performed by Contractor,
where such failure shall continue for a period of thirty
(30) days after written notice thereof from City to Contrac-
tor;
(2) the failure of Contractor to perform all
work required of the Contractor hereunder in a good, thorough
and workmanlike manner;
(3) the filing by or against Contractor of a
petition to have Contractor adjudged a bankrupt or a petition
for reorganization or arrangement under any laws relating to
bankruptcy; the making by Contractor of any general assign-
ment, or general arrangement for the benefit of creditors.
Failure to comply with any of the terms, provisions
or conditions of this Contract by Contractor by reason of
major disaster, epidemic or other great emergency shall not
constitute a breach of contract.
B. REMEDIES. In the event of any such material
default or breach by Contractor, City may at any time there-
after, upon giving Contractor written notice as herein
provided, and without limiting City in the exercise of any
other right or remedy which City may have by reason of such
default or breach:
(1) terminate this Agreement and all of
Contractor's rights hereunder. In the event of such termi-
nation Contractor shall pay over to City, for the benefit of
the occupants of residential units of the Northern Section,
all refuse fees which have been collected but have not yet
been earned by Contractor, such fees to be prorated to the
date of termination, on the basis of a thirty (30) -day
month.
(2) pursue any other remedy now or hereafter
available to City under the laws or judicial decisions of
the State of California.
(3) cure the default of Contractor itself;
provided that if City, by reason of Contractor's default,
pays any sum or does any act that requires the payment of
any sum, the sum paid by City shall be immediately due from
Contractor to City and shall bear interest at the rate of
twelve percent (12%) per annum from the date the sum is paid
by City until City is reimbursed by Contractor.
-3-
ARTICLE II
TERM AND AREA OF AGREEMENT
SECTION 6. TERM OF CONTRACT. The term of this Contract
shall be for a period of five (5) years commencing on the
day of , 1980. The Contract shall
automatically be renewed at the end of each year for an
additional one (l) -year period unless a Notice of Non -
Renewal is given as provided below.
If either the Contractor or the City desires not to
renew the Contract, a notice shall be served upon the other
party. Unless said notice is served within thirty (30) days
prior to the renewal date, the Contract shall be renewed for
an additional period.
If notice of Non - Renewal is served as hereinabove
provided, the existing contract shall remain in full force
and effect for the balance of the period remaining on the
original term or the last renewal of the Contract, as the
case may be.
ARTICLE III
GENERAL SCOPE OF CONTRACTOR'S
DUTIES AND SERVICES
SECTION 7. GENERAL DUTIES OF CONTRACTOR. Contractor
shall have the sole and exclusive duty to dispose of all
refuse set out for collection from all residential units
within the Northern Section, and Contractor shall furnish
all labor, materials and equipment necessary for the perfor-
mance of such work, provided, however, that the Contractor
shall not be required to collect any uncontainerized scat-
tered rubbish or garbage unless such garbage has been thor-
oughly drained, wrapped and containerized. Except as other-
wise provided herein, Contractor shall not be required to
dispose of excluded items. All of the work required of the
Contractor hereunder shall be done in a good, thorough and
workmanlike manner. Notwithstanding the foregoing provis-
ions of this section, Contractor shall have not duty to dis-
pose of refuse from those residential units within the
Northern Section for which an exemption from refuse collec-
tion charges has been granted by the City.
SECTION S. DISPOSAL. All refuse collected by Contractor
shall become the property of Contractor immediately upon the
collection thereof, and shall be forthwith removed and
transported by Contractor to a lawful place of disposal,
which shall be provided, arranged for or furnished by Con-
tractor. Contractor, at its own expense shall pay all costs
*Section 7 was repeated from previous Agreement, and this new sentence was added.
-4-
and charges in connection with said disposal.
SECTION 9. LITTER OR SPILLAGE. Should any refuse be
spilled or dropped by Contractor from any vehicle transport-
ing the same or otherwise, or if any vehicle operated by the
Contractor shall discharge any fluid, either upon public or
private property, it shall immediately be cleaned up and
removed by Contractor at the expense of Contractor.
SECTION 10. ASSIGNMENT, CONSENT REQUIRED. Contractor
shall not assign this Agreement or any part thereof, or any
right or privilege connected therewith, without first obtain-
ing City's written consent. One consent by City shall not
be consent to a subsequent assignment. Contractor's inter-
est in this Agreement is not assignable by operation of law,
nor is any assignment of its interest herein, without City's
written consent. The transfer, either voluntarily or invol-
untarily, of all or substantially all of the assets of
Contractor, the transfer, either voluntarily or involuntarily,
of a majority of the voting (or common) stock of Contractor;
the merger or dissolution of Contractor shall be deemed an
assignment of the Agreement for the purposes of this Agree-
ment.
Any assignment of this Agreement, or any part hereof,
or any right or privilege connected herewith, without the
written consent of City first had and obtained shall consti-
tute a material breach of this Agreement.
SECTION 11. EXCLUSIVENESS OF CONTRACT. Except as
otherwise required by state law, it is agreed by and between
the parties hereto that it is the intention of the parties
hereby the terms of this Contract to constitute Contractor
the sole and exclusive person, firm or corporation author-
ized or permitted to collect, remove and dispose of garbage,
rubbish, waste and other refuse matter from all residential
premises within the Northern Section during the term of this
Contract. Contractor hereby releases any and all rights
given it under state law to continue collecting refuse from
any residential premises in the City.
City shall protect Contractor's rights to an exclusive
contract by proper ordinances, and by reasonable enforcement
thereof.
SECTION 12. FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION. The Contractor
shall collect from each residential unit a minimum of once
each week, but can provide additional collection service at
additional charge whenever such service is necessary to
prevent excessive accumulation of refuse,
SECTION 13. COLLECTION- EMERGENCY VEHICLE. Contractor
agrees to have available between the hours of 8:00 a.m, and
• The word "elsewhere" was deleted.
#s When numbering the original sections was made, "12" was inadvertently left out. All sections
have been renumbered.
-5-
3 :00 p.m. an emergency vehicle and other necessary equipment
to take care of any complaints or emergencies which require
immediate attention.
SECTION 14. ANNUAL CLEAN -UP CAMPAIGN. Contractor
agrees to furnish without additional or special charge
trucks, labor and all other necessary equipment and person-
nel to participate in an annual City Clean -Up Campaign for
one week at such time as is designated by City. Collections
during the Annual Clean -Up Campaign will be made at locations
designated by the City, provided, however, that the number
of locations shall not exceed ten (10). In addition to
collecting refuse as defined in the refuse ordinance, Contrac-
tor shall also collect furniture, large household appliances,
automobile parts, scrap lumber, and other like items.
SECTION 15. RECORD OF NON - COLLECTION. When refuse
deposited for collection is not collected by the Contractor
for sufficient reason, he shall leave a red tag provided at
his cost at least 2 -7/8" x 5 -3/4" in size, on which he has
indicated the reasons for his refusal of the garbage or
rubbish, giving reference to the section of the City ordi-
nance or to the section of City or Contractor's Rule which
has been violated, and which gives grounds for his refusal.
This information shall either be in writing or by means of a
check system.
SECTION 16. ENTERING PRIVATE PROPERTY. The Contractor
shall in no-event be under any obligation to enter private
courts or places or other private property to make collec-
tions under this Contract. However, if by invitation of the
owner or occupant and agreed by the Contractor, Contractor
shall assume that the pavement and entry way is of sufficient
strength and safety to support his vehicle without damage
either to the premises or Contractor's equipment or men,
Contractor shall have the right to enter such premises.
SECTION 17. CARE OF CONTAINERS. The Contractor, his
agents and /or his employees shall not throw garbage or
rubbish containers from the truck to the pavement or in any
other way use excessive roughness in handling the ware, but
shall use prudent care. However, notwithstanding the cus-
tomer shall be responsible for the repair and replacement of
his own containers.
ARTICLE IV
CHARGES FOR COLLECTION
SECTION 18. CHARGES. Charges for refuse collection
shall be reviewed once annually, in October of each year,
and may be adjusted as the City Council may, in its discre-
tion, determine, provided, however, that without the consent
^the "charges" section was deleted in its entirety and new language substituted.
-6-
of the Contrator the charges shall not be reduced below the
amounts established by Resolution No. 60-
SECTION 19. EXCLUDED MATERIAL PICK -UP. Contractor may
contract with owners, residents and proprietors of residen-
tial property in the Contract Area to collect and dispose of
excluded materials on such terms as may be mutually agree-
able to Contractor and the customer concerned.
SECTION 20. FRANCHISE FEE. Contractor shall pay to
City, as hereinafter provided, as a franchise fee and as
consideration for entering into this Agreement, the follow-
ing:
A. A sum of money equal to five percent (5 %) of
the gross receipts of Contractor. The term "gross receipts"
as used herein shall be the total amount in dollars of all
sums collected by Contractor from occupants or owners of
residential units in the Northern Section for the performance
of disposal services required or authorized by this Agree-
ment.
B. On or before the thirtieth (30th) day of each
month Contractor shall pay over to City the City's percent-
age share of the gross receipts of Contractor collected
during the previous calendar month.
C. On or before the thirtieth (30th) day of each
calendar month, Contractor shall prepare and deliver to City
a monthly statement of gross receipts of the Contractor
during the previous calendar month, certified by an authorized
officer of Contractor. In the event City is not satisfied
with any such statement submitted by Contractor, City shall
have the right to make a special audit, by auditors selected
by City, of the books and records of Contractor. If such
audit shows a deficiency for the period covered, the amount
thereof shall be paid promptly by Contractor; if such audit
shall show an overpayment, the excess shall be applied on
any amounts then due to City by Contractor, and the balance,
if any, refunded promptly to Contractor. If any such state-
ment is found to be incorrect to an extent of more than
three percent (38) over the figures submitted by Contractor,
Contractor shall pay for such special audit, and if such
special audit verifies Contractor's statement to be correct
or not to vary more than three percent (38) over the figures
submitted by Contractor, the expense of such audit shall be
borne by City.
D. During the term of this Agreement, and for a
period of four (4) years thereafter, Contractor shall keep
and maintain full, complete and proper books, records and
accounts of all gross receipts.
-7-
SECTION 21. BONDS. The Contractor shall procure and
maintain and keep on file with the City Clerk during the
term of the contract, the following valid and unexpired
bonds, in a form approved by the City Attorney, executed by
Contractor as principal, and by the corporate surety comply-
ing with each and all of the provisions of Section 1056 of
the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California, as
surety. Each bond shall provide that it shall not be
cancelled by the insurance carried unless thirty (30) days'
prior notice of such intention to cancel shall first have
been served upon the City Clark of City. Each such bond
shall further provide that it shall not be void upon the
first recovery, but that same may be sued on and recovered
from time to time until the whole penalty is exhausted.
A. A Faithful Performance Bond, in the principal
sum of $15,000.00 to guarantee the faithful performance of
the contract during the term hereof.
SECTION 22. COMPENSATION INSURANCE. The Contractor
Shall, during the life of this contract, keep fully insured,
at his own expense, all persons employed by him in connection
with the Contract, as required by the "Workmen's Compensation
Insurance and Safety Act" of the State of California, and
shall not hold the City responsible for any liability that
may arise by reason of the injuries to any employees of the
Contractor who are injured whild performing any work or
labor necessary to carry out the provisions of this Contract.
The Contractor shall, at all times, keep on file with
the City Clerk evidence that the Contractor is fully and
properly insured, as required by the Act.
SECTION 23. RECORDS OF OPERATION. Contractor shall
keep and preserve, during the term of this Agreement, full,
complete and true records of his operations, including, but
not limited to, cost figures relating to personnel, equip-
ment and administrative overhead incurred in collecting and
disposing of the garbage and trash from all residences and
premises within the City. Contractor shall engage a certi-
fied public accountant to prepare same and make available
for City Administrator's review but such records shall
remain confidential.
SECTION 24. NOTICES. Any notice that may be given to
Contractor under or with respect to this Contract shall be
deemed to have been given when personally delivered or when
sent to Contractor by registered or certified mail, return
receipt requested, postage paid, addressed to Contractor at
Post Office Box 1, Alta Loma, California 91701. Any notice
that may be given to City under or with respect to this
Contract shall be deemed to have been given when personally
delivered to the City Clerk of City or when sent to City by
-8-
registered or certified mail, return receipt requested,
postage paid, addressed to the City Clerk of City at 9320 -C
Base Line Road, P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California
91730. Either party may change the place to which notices
to it are to be mailed by giving notice of change of address
in the manner described in this Section.
SECTION 25. POLICE POWER. City reserves the right to
determine, in the exercise of its powers, to provide for the
public health and welfare, whether technological or other
changes materially affect the level of the service required
by the City, and in such case, the level of service hereunder
may be adjusted by City and this Contract shall be reviewed
and revised accordingly.
SECTION 26. INTEGRATION. This Agreement, upon accep-
tance by the parties hereto, constitutes the sole and only
agreement between Contractor and City as to the subject
matter hereof, and is intended by each to constitute the
final written memorandum of all of their agreements and
understandings in this transaction.
SECTION 27. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be
executed in any number of counterparts with the same force
and effect as if all signatures were appended to one document,
each of which shall be deemed an original.
SECTION 28: INVALIlicatiDITY. If any term or provision of
this Agreement or app on thereof is held invalid or
unenforceable as to any party, the balance of the Agreement
shall not be affected thereby, and each remaining term and
provision of this Agreement shall be valid and shall be
enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.
SECTION 29. MISCELLANEOUS. The masculine gender, the
singular number and the present tense, shall be deemed to
include the feminine and neuter genders, plural number and
past and future tenses, respectively, where the context so
requires. The article and section headings herein are used
only for the purposes of convenience and shall not be deemed
to limit the subject of the articles and sections hereof.
EXECUTED at Rancho Cucamonga, California, on the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a (NORTH)
municipal corporation YUKON DISPOSAL, a California
corporation
BY: BY:
PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER, Mayor (Title)
ATTEST: BY:
(Title)
N M. WASSERMAN, City Clerk
-9-
r
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
FOR
REFUSE DISPOSAL SOUTHERN SECTION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day
of , 1980, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "City ", and RANCHO DISPOSAL, a California
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor ", provides
as follows;
W I T N E S S E T H•
WHEREAS, heretofore City has duly adopted an ordinance
concerning the collection, removal and disposal of refuse
within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, said ordinance authorizes the City Council of
City to contract with any person, firm or corporation for
the collection, removal and disposal of such refuse from
within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
and agreements hereinafter contained, the parties hereto
agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 1. REFUSE ORDINANCE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.
All provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Ordinance No.
117, as the same now exists or as it may hereafter be
amended, and all provisions of any other ordinance of the
City which may hereafter be enacted and which in any way
deals with the subject of disposal of refuse from residential
units in the City, hereinafter collectively referred to as
the "Refuse Ordinance ", are hereby incorporated by reference
and made a part of this Agreement as if the same were set
forth herein in full.
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this
Contract, the following words and phrases are defined and
shall be construed as follows, unless it shall be apparent
from the context that a different meaning is intended:
A. "SOUTHERN SECTION" shall mean that portion of
the City south of the street of Base Line.
B. "DISPOSE" and "DISPOSAL" shall mean the complete
operation of collecting, treating, transportation and dispos-
ing of accumulations of refuse and the products or residue
-1-
arising from any treatment.
•- r
C. "EXCLUDED MATERIALS" shall mean those wastes
and other materials not included in the refuse ordinance
definitions of refuse, garbage, combustible rubbish and non-
combustible rubbish.
SECTION 3. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. The Contractor shall
comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of
the State, County, City and all political subdivisions
thereof having jurisdiction over work done or to be done
under this Contract; the Contractor must conform to and
abide by all ordinances of City and of the County and of
cities through which refuse collected may be hauled or
wherein such refuse may be disposed of.
This Contract, all terms, provisions, conditions and
specifications hereof, and all duties and obligations imposed
hereunder upon the Contractor, his agents, employees and
assigns and all of the rights and privileges of the Contrac-
tor hereunder, shall be subject to and conditioned on the
provisions of such statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations
as the City Council may, from time to time, adopt or make
with respect to collection, removal or disposal of refuse,
with due regard to the financial impact and mutual interest
of the Contractor or the City.
SECTION 4. INDEMNIFICATION AND EXEMPTION FROM LIABILITY.
Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City Erom and
against any and all claims arising from the conduct of
Contractor's business or from any activity, work or thing
done, permitted or suffered by Contractor in the performance
of this Agreement, and shall further indemnify and hold
harmless City from and against any and all claims arising
from any breach or default in the performance of any obliga-
tions on Contractor's part to be performed under the terms
of this Contract or arising from any negligence of the
Contractor or any of Contractor's agents, officers, contrac-
tors, or employees, and from and against all costs, attor-
neys' fees, expenses and liabilities incurred in the defense
of any such claim or any action or proceeding brought there-
on; and in case any action or proceeding be brought against
City by reason of any such claim, Contractor upon notice
from City shall defend the same at Contractor's expense by
counsel satisfactory to City or City may defend the same and
require payment of attorneys' fees in advance from Contractor.
SECTION 5. DEFAULTS; REMEDIES.
A. DEFAULTS. In addition to anything set forth
specifically herein and referred to as a material default,
the occurrence of any one or more of the following events
shall constitute a material default and breach of this
-2-
Agreement by Contractor:
(1) the failure by Contractor to observe or
perform any of the covenants, conditions or provisions of
this Contract to be observed or performed by Contractor,
where such failure shall continue for a period of thirty
(30) days after written notice thereof from City to Contrac-
tor;
(2) the failure of Contractor to perform all
work required of the Contractor hereunder in a good, thorough
and workmanlike manner;
(3) the filing by or against Contractor of a
petition to have Contractor adjudged a bankrupt or a petition
for reorganization or arrangement under any laws relating to
bankruptcy; the making by Contractor of any general assign-
ment, or general arrangement for the benefit of creditors.
Failure to comply with any of the terms, provisions
or conditions of this Contract by Contractor by reason of
major disaster, epidemic or other great emergency shall not
constitute a breach of contract.
H. REMEDIES. In the event of any such material
default or breach contractor, City may at any time there-
after, upon giving Contractor written notice as herein
provided, and without limiting City in the exercise of any
other right or remedy which City may have by reason of such
default or breach:
(1) terminate this Agreement and all of
Contractor's rights hereunder. In the event of such termi-
nation Contractor shall pay over to City, for the benefit of
the occupants of residential units of the Southern Section,
all refuse fees which have been collected but have not yet
been earned by Contractor, such fees to be prorated to the
date of termination, on the basis of a thirty (30) -day
month.
(2) pursue any other remedy now or hereafter
available to City under the laws or judicial decisions of
the State of California.
(3) cure the default of Contractor itself;
provided that if City, by reason of Contractor's default,
pays any sum or does any act that requires the payment of
any sum, the sum paid by City shall be immediately due from
Contractor to City and shall bear interest at the rate of
twelve percent (128) per annum from the date the sum is paid
by City until City is reimbursed by Contractor.
-3-
ARTICLE II
TERM AND AREA OF AGREEMENT
SECTION 6. TERM OF CONTRACT. The term of this Contract
shall be for a period of five (5) years commencing on the
day of , 1980. The Contract shall
automatically be renewed at the end of each year for an
additional one (1) -year period unless a Notice of Non -
Renewal is given as provided below.
if either the Contractor or the City desires not to
renew the Contract, a notice shall be served upon the other
party. Unless said notice is served within thirty (30) days
prior to the renewal date, the Contract shall be renewed for
an additional period.
If notice of Non - Renewal is served as hereinabove
provided, the existing contract shall remain in full force
and effect for the balance of the period remaining on the
original term or the last renewal of the Contract, as the
case may be.
ARTICLE III
GENERAL SCOPE OF CONTRACTOR'S
DUTIES AND SERVICES
SECTION 7. GENERAL DUTIES OF CONTRACTOR. Contractor
shall have the sole and exclusive duty to dispose of all
refuse set out for collection from all residential units
within the Southern Section, and Contractor shall furnish
all labor, materials and equipment necessary for the perfor-
mance of such work, provided, however, that the Contractor
shall not be required to collect any uncontainerized scat-
tered rubbish or garbage unless such garbage has been thor-
oughly drained, wrapped and containerized. Except as other-
wise provided herein, Contractor shall not be required to
dispose of excluded items. All of the work required of the
Contractor hereunder shall be done in a good, thorough and
workmanlike manner. Notwithstandinq the foregoinq provis-
refuse co lec-
SECTION B. DISPOSAL. All refuse collected by Contractor
shall ecome the property of Contractor immediately upon the
collection thereof, and shall be forthwith removed and
transported by Contractor to a lawful place of disposal,
whic', shall be provided, arranged for or furnished by Con-
tractor. Contractor, at its own expense shall pay all costs
*Section 7 was repeated from previous Agreement, and this new sentence was added.
-4-
and charges in connection with said disposal.
SECTION 9. LITTER OR SPILLAGE. Should any refuse be
spilled or dropped by Contractor from any vehicle transport-
ing the•same or otherwise, or if any vehicle operated by the
Contractor shall discharge any fluid, either upon public or
private property, it shall immediately be cleaned up and
removed by Contractor at the expense of Contractor.
SECTION 10. ASSIGNMENT, CONSENT REQUIRED. Contractor
shall not assign this Agreement or any part thereof, or any
right or privilege connected therewith, without first obtain-
ing City's written consent. One consent by City shall not
be consent to a subsequent assignment. Contractor's inter-
est in this Agreement is not assignable by operation of law,
nor is any assignment of its interest herein, without City's
written consent. The transfer, either voluntarily or invol-
untarily, of all or substantially all of the assets of
Contractor, the transfer, either voluntarily or involuntarily,
of a majority of the voting (or common) stock of Contractor;
the merger or dissolution of Contractor shall be deemed an
assignment of the Agreement for the purposes of this Agree-
ment.
Any assignment of this Agreement, or any part hereof,
or any right or privilege connected herewith, without the
written consent of City first had and obtained shall consti-
tute a material breach of this Agreement.
SECTION 11. EXCLUSIVENESS OF CONTRACT. Except as
otherwise required by state law, it is agreed by and between
the parties hereto that it is the intention of the parties
hereby the terms of this Contract to constitute Contractor
the sole and exclusive person, firm or corporation author-
ized or permitted to collect, remove and dispose of garbage,
rubbish, waste and other refuse matter from all residential
premises within the Southern Section during the term of this
Contract. Contractor hereby releases any and all rights
given it under state law to continue collecting refuse from
any residential premises in the City.
City shall protect Contractor's rights to an exclusive
contract by proper ordinances, and by reasonable enforcement
thereof.
* SECTION 12. FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION. The Contractor
shall collect from eac residential unit a minimum of once
each week, but can provide additional collection service at
additional charge whenever such service is necessary to
prevent excessive accumulation of refuse.
** SECTION la. COLLECTION - EMERGENCY VEHICLE. Contractor
agrees to haveavai able between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and
* The word "elsewhere" was deleted.
** When numbering the original sections were made, "12" was inadvertently left
out. All sections have been renumbered ( "13" became "12 ", etc.).
3:00 p.m. an emergency vehicle and other necessary equipment
to take care of any complaints or emergencies which require
immediate attention.
SECTION 14. ANNUAL CLEAN -UP CAMPAIGN. Contractor
agrees to furnish without additional or special charge
trucks, labor and all other necessary equipment and person-
nel to participate in an annual City Clean -Up Campaign for
one week at such time as is designated by City. Collections
during the Annual Clean -Up Campaign will be made at locations
designated by the City, provided, however, that the number
of locations shall not exceed ten (10). In addition to
collecting refuse as defined in the refuse ordinance, Contrac-
tor shall also collect furniture, large household appliances,
automobile parts, scrap lumber, and other like items.
SECTION 15. RECORD OF NON - COLLECTION. When refuse
deposited for collection is not collected by the Contractor
for sufficient reason, he shall leave a red tag provided at
his cost at least 2 -7/8" x 5 -3/4" in size, on which he has
indicated the reasons for his refusal of the garbage or
rubbish, giving reference to the section of the City ordi-
nance or to the section of City or Contractor's Rule which
has been violated, and which gives grounds for his refusal.
This information shall either be in writing or by means of a
check system.
SECTION 16. ENTERING PRIVATE PROPERTY. The Contractor
shall .in no event be under any obligation to enter private
courts or places or other private property to make collec-
tions under this Contract. However, if by invitation of the
owner or occupant and agreed by the Contractor, Contractor
shall assume that the pavement and entry way is of sufficient
strength and safety to support his vehicle without damage
either to the premises or Contractor's equipment or men,
Contractor shall have the right to enter such premises.
SECTION 17. CARE OF CONTAINERS. The Contractor, his
agents and /or his employees shall not throw garbage or
rubbish containers from the truck to the pavement or in any
other way use excessive roughness in handling the ware, but
shall use prudent care. However, notwithstanding the cus-
tomer shall be responsible for the repair and replacement of
his own containers.
ARTICLE IV
CHARGES FOR COLLECTION
SECTION 18. CHARGES. Charges for refuse collection
shall be reviewed once annually, in October of each year,
and may be adjusted as the City Council may, in its discre-
tion, determine, provided, however, that without the consent
* The "charges" section was deleted in its entirety and new language substituted.
-6-
of the Contrator the charges shall not be reduced below the
amounts established by Resolution No. 80-
SECTION 19. EXCLUDED MATERIAL PICK -UP. Contractor may
contract with owners, residents and proprietors of residen-
tial property in the Contract Area to collect and dispose of
excluded materials on such terms as may be mutually agree-
able to Contractor and the customer concerned.
SECTION 20. FRANCHISE FEE. Contractor shall pay to
City, as hereinafter provided, as a franchise fee and as
consideration for entering into this Agreement, the follow-
ing:
A. A sum of money equal to five percent (5R) of
the gross receipts of Contractor. The term "gross receipts"
as used herein shall be the total amount in dollars of all
sums collected by Contractor from occupants or owners of
residential units in the Southern Section for the performance
of disposal services required or authorized by this Agree-
ment.
H. on or before the thirtieth (30th) day of each
month Contractor shall pay over to City the City's percent-
age share of the gross receipts of Contractor collected
during the previous calendar month.
C. On or before the thirtieth (30th) day of each
calendar month, Contractor shall prepare and deliver to City
a monthly statement of gross receipts of the Contractor
during the previous calendar month, certified by an authorized
officer of Contractor. In the event City is not satisfied
with any such statement submitted by Contractor, City shall
have the right to make a special audit, by auditors selected
by City, of the books and records of Contractor. If such
audit shows a deficiency for the period covered, the amount
thereof shall be paid promptly by Contractor; if such audit
shall show an overpayment, the excess shall be applied on
any amounts then due to City by Contractor, and the balance,
if any, refunded promptly to Contractor. If any such state-
ment is found to be incorrect to an extent of more than
three percent (3%) over the figures submitted by Contractor,
Contractor shall pay for such special audit, and if such
special audit verifies Contractor's statement to be correct
or not to vary more than three percent (38) over the figures
submitted by Contractor, the expense of such audit shall be
borne by City.
D. During the term of this Agreement, and for a
period of four (4) years thereafter, Contractor shall keep
and maintain full, complete and proper books, records and
accounts of all gross receipts.
-7-
SECTION 21. BONDS. The Contractor shall procure and
maintain and keep on file with the City Clerk during the
term of the contract, the following valid and unexpired
bonds, in a form approved by the City Attorney, executed by
Contractor as principal, and by the corporate surety comply-
ing with each and all of the provisions of Section 1056 of
the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California, as
surety. Each bond shall provide that it shall not be
cancelled by the insurance carried unless thirty (30) days'
prior notice of such intention to cancel shall first have
been served upon the City Clerk of City. Each such bond
shall further provide that it shall not be void upon the
first recovery, but that same may be sued on and recovered
from time to time until the whole penalty is exhausted.
A. A Faithful Performance Bond, in the principal
sum of $15,000.00 to guarantee the faithful performance of
the contract during the term hereof.
SECTION 22. COMPENSATION INSURANCE. The Contractor
shall, during the life of this contract, keep fully insured,
at his own expense, all persons employed by him in connection
with the Contract, as required by the "Workmen's Compensation
Insurance and Safety Act" of the State of California, and
shall not hold the City responsible for any liability that
may arise by reason of the injuries to any employees of the
Contractor who are injured whild performing any work or
labor necessary to carry out the provisions of this Contract.
The Contractor shall, at all times, keep on file with
the City Clerk evidence that the Contractor is fully and
properly insured, as required by the Act.
SECTION 23. RECORDS OF OPERATION. Contractor shall
keep and preserve, during the term of this Agreement, full,
complete and true records of his operations, including, but
not limited to, cost figures relating to personnel, equip-
ment and administrative overhead incurred in collecting and
disposing of the garbage and trash from all residences and
premises within the City. Contractor shall engage a certi-
fied public accountant to prepare same and make available
for City Administrator's review but such records shall
remain confidential.
SECTION 24. NOTICES. Any notice that may be given to
Contractor under or with respect to this Contract shall be
deemed to have been given when personally delivered or when
sent to Contractor by registered or certified mail, return
receipt requested, postage paid, addressed to Contractor at
14188 Whittram Street, Fontana, California 92335. Any
notice that may be given to City under or with respect to
this; Contract shall be deemed to have been given when
personally delivered to the City Clerk of City or when sent
-8-
to City by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested, postage paid, addressed to the City Clerk of City
at 9320 -C Base Line Road, P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga,
California 91730. Either party may change the place to
which notices to it are to be mailed by giving notice of
change of address in the manner described in this Section.
SECTION 25. POLICE POWER. City reserves the right to
determine, in the exercise of its powers, to provide for the
public health and welfare, whether technological or other
changes materially affect the level of the service required
by the City, and in such case, the level of service hereunder
may be adjusted by City and this Contract shall be reviewed
and revised accordingly.
SECTION 26. INTEGRATION. This Agreement, upon accep-
tance by the parties hereto, constitutes the sole and only
agreement between Contractor and City as to the subject
matter hereof, and is intended by each to constitute the
final written memorandum of all of their agreements and
understandings in this transaction.
SECTION 27. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be
executed in any number of counterparts with the same force
and effect as if all signatures were appended to one document,
each of which shall be deemed an original.
SECTION 28: INVALIDITY. If any term or provision of
this Agreement or application thereof is held invalid or
unenforceable as to any party, the balance of the Agreement
shall not be affected thereby, and each remaining term and
provision of this Agreement shall be valid and shall be
enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.
SECTION 29. MISCELLANEOUS. The masculine gender, the
singular number and the present tense, shall be deemed to
include the feminine and neuter genders, plural number and
past and future tenses, respectively, where the context so
requires. The article and section headings herein are used
only for the purposes of convenience and shall not be deemed
to limit the subject of the articles and sections hereof.
EXECUTED at Rancho Cucamonga, California, on the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a (SOUTH)
municipal corporation RANCHO DISPOSAL, a California
corporation
BY: BY:
PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER, Mayor (Title)
ATTEST: BY:
(Title)
LAUREN M. WASSERMAN, City Clerk
_4_
/� / /��U
/� �
�� �/ > i
i
/� � ' i
. / �
,�' � �
,�
� � � �,
.,
��
/ _ _ /
� ' � �i �
� � / i
j. �,
/,i • �
/ � ��
r
�� � �
/ � i
/'
i /� �
/_ / �
r
•
/.
�� i
",
i
i i / �� � �
// i i
i i
� �/ � � /
� i i
�i � / � J
// _ , i
�- /
� � � -�
,� i
i '
� � �.
ii i �
i �.
n
/ � � � / �
i
i � � �
i
,I / / .i �
/ i
� i / i / , /
/ �
i
� / � a'
GG�-� � �. 9 /Jd / ---
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -120
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CHARGES
FOR THE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE FROM
RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
WHEREAS, City Ordinance No.Oad, authorizes
the City Council to fix and determine t e charges to be made for the
collection and disposal of refuse; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the following
charges are reasonable and appropriate;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following rates are
established for the collection and disposal of refuse from residential
units in the City:
(a), Residential unit, $ 5':L0 per month; and,
(b) Residential unit when head of household is age sixty -
two (62) or over, $!%;%1` °Per month. li4�
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M.Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ORDINANCE NO, 132
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 117
AND PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL, COLLECTION AND
DISPOSAL OF REFUSE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Collection of Refuse: Charges.
(a) Except as otherwise permitted by this Ordinance, a
residential refuse service shall be provided to the citizens of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga at least once each calendar week.
(b) A monthly charge for the collection of refuse shall
be made against the occupants of each residential unit within the City
not exempted therefrom as herein provided. The amount of such monthly
charge shall be fixed by the City Council by resolution. The City
Council may provide for a reduced monthly charge where the head of
household of a residential unit is age sixty -two (62) or over. Refuse
collection charges shall be reviewed once annually, in October, and may
be adjusted should the City Council, in its discretion, determines that
adjustment is appropriate; provided, however, no change in amount shall
be effective until thirty (30) days after the adoption of a resolution
changing the same.
SECTION 2: Method of Billing. Refuse collection charges
for each residential unit shame baby and collected by the collector
that provides services to such unit. Refuse collection charges shall be
due and payable upon being billed, and delinquent twenty -five (25) days
thereafter.
SECTION 3: Liability for Payment. In the event the occupant
of a residential unit fails to pay refuse collection charges within
thirty (30) days following the billing thereof, the owner of the premises
upon which such residential unit is located shall also become jointly
and severally liable for the payment of such charges.
SECTION 4: Penalty for Non-Payment. A penalty shall be
determined bution of the City Council from time to time establishing
a charge for those who fail to pay the regular charge within thirty (30)
days following the date on which they are first billed thereof.
SECTION 5: Ad'ustment for Vacancies. No collection charges
shall be mide during the term that a res entra unit is vacant, provided
that written notice of the dates of commencement and termination of the
vacancy is given to the servicing collector, and further provided that
refuse is not set out for collection from such vacant unit.
Ordinance No.
Page 2
SECTION 6: Refuse Defined. "Refuse" shall mean and
include garbage, combustible rubbish and noncombustible rubbish.
(a) "Garbage" shall mean and include all kitchen and
table refuse, leavings, offal, and every accumulation of organic matter
which attends the preparation, consumption, decay or dealing or storage
of meat, fish, fowl, fruits and vegetables. "Garbage" does not include
human body waste or liquid swill.
(b) "Combustible rubbish" shall mean and include but
shall not be limited to paper, cardboard, rags, clothing, books, footwear,
packing materials, grass, leaves, brush, and other substances which will
incinerate through contact with flames of ordinary temperature. "Combustible
rubbish" shall not include explosives or flammable liquids.
(c) "Non - combustible rubbish" shall mean and include but
shall not be limited to cans, bottles, glass, wire, ashes and other
solid waste matter which will not incinerate through contact with flames
of ordinary temperature. "Non - combustible rubbish" shall not include
furniture, large household appliances, junk autos or parts therefrom,
dirt, rock or material from the demolition, alteration or construction
of buildings.
SECTION 7: Other Definitions. For the purposes of this
Ordinance, the MTOwing words and phrases shall have the following
meaning:
(a) "Apartment house" shall mean a building, or portion
thereof, designed for occupancy by four (4) or more families, living
independently of each other.
(b) "Commercial" shall mean any business, industry,
commercial establishment or construction site.
(c) "Collector" shall mean any person or company designated
by the City Council by ordinance, resolution or contract to collect
refuse within the City.
(d) "Each residential unit" shall mean each place used
for residential purposes for a single family. If more than one (1)
family is in one (1) dwelling, such dwelling shall constitute as many
units as there are families. Any residential unit used secondarily for
business purposes may be considered a commercial unit for the purposes
of assigning charges for special collection purposes.
SECTION 8: Rece tacles Re uired. Except as provided in
this Ordinance, it shall be un aw u for any person to keep, place or
deposit refuse in or upon any public or private property except in
refuse receptacles which comply with the requirements of this Ordinance.
Ordinance No.
Page 3
SECTION 9: Refuse Receptacles: Residential
(a) Except as provided in this section, all refuse from
a residential unit shall be kept in a metal or plastic receptacle which
has a tight - fitting cover which prevents the escape of odors, and which
is equipped with at least two (2) bails or handles. Receptacles shall
not be less than fifteen (15) gallons nor more than thirty -five (35)
gallons in capacity, nor shall the maximum gross weight of a loaded
receptacle set out for collection exceed seventy -five (75) pounds in
weight.
(b) Grass clippings, leaves and other hard work debris,
other than branches or tree limbs, may be either deposited in metal or
plastic receptacles, as above mentioned, or in wooden or sturdy cardboard
boxes, tubs, plastic trash bags or similar receptacles. If cardboard
boxes are used, the cardboard boxes along with the contents shall be
considered refuse set out for collection and both the cardboard boxes
and contents shall be collected.
(c) Branches, tree limbs or other similar debris shall
be tied with sturdy twine, rope or wire, in bundles not exceeding four
feet (4') in length nor eighteen inches (18 ") in diameter.
(d) Newspapers and magazines may be either deposited in
metal or plastic receptacles, as above mentioned, or tied with sturdy
twine, rope or wire, in bundles not exceeding fifty (50) pounds in
weight.
(e) Cardboard boxes may be either flattened and deposited
in metal or plastic receptacles, as above mentioned, or may be flattened
and tied in bundles not exceeding four feet (4') in length nor fifty
(50) pounds in weight.
(f) Apartment houses may utilize contractor- approved
commercial type collection bins and shall do so if required by the
collector serving the apartment house. When an apartment house utilizes
commercial -type bins one (1) 3 -yard bin shall be furnished for each
multiple of six (5) residential units or fraction thereof.
(g) Garbage may be fed to animals upon property where
animals may lawfully be kept in the City if proper sanitary conditions
are maintained.
SECTION 10: Expense of Refuse Receptacles. Refuse receptacles
required by this Ordinance s>b be provide by the occupants of each
residential unit or commerical establishment within the City and without
expense to the City.
SECTION 11: Receptacles: Cleanliness. The exteriors of
the refuse receptacles inc uding covers, shall be kept clean by the
occupant. The interior of refuse receptacles shall be cleaned periodically
to j,revent accumulation of grease or decomposing materials.
Ordinance No.
Page 4
SECTION 12: Placement of Refuse Receptacles
(a) Except when set out for collection as herein provided,
refuse receptacles shall be kept within a building or otherwise out of
view from the public right -of -way adjacent to any property.
(b) No refuse receptacle shall be placed upon any public
street, alley, sidewalk or right -of -way in such a manner as to impede or
endanger pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
(c) Refuse receptacles and containerized or bundled
refuse shall be placed at the curb for collection, but not prior to
eighteen (18) hours before the scheduled collection day.
(d) All refuse receptacles shall be removed from public
view the same day collection service is rendered.
(e) All commercial -type collection bins or drop bodies
shall be placed in an area which is easily accessible to collection
personnel and equipment, with sufficient way to safely collect and
maneuver without injury to persons or property.
SECTION 13: Periods to Set Out Refuse and Time for Collection.
Refuse sha 1 be set out for col ection not ater tan 6:00 a.m. on the
day of collection. Any refuse remaining uncollected after the completion
of collection in that block shall constitute prima facie evidence that
such refuse was set out for collection after the expiration of the time
designated fro collection in that block. The person making the late
deposit shall return all uncollected refuse to the premises from whence
it came or shall arrange for a special collection to be made.
SECTION 14: Garbage to Be Wrapped. Garbage shall be wrapped
in paper o r in plastic adequate to contain it without spillage or leakage
before it is deposited in a refuse receptacle.
SECTION IS: Destruction of Refuse Receptacles Unlawful. It
shall be unlawful for any person to intentionally abuse, dent, bend,
mutilate, damage or destroy any refuse receptacle or cover thereof,
provided, however, that this section shall not apply to the owner of
such refuse receptacle or a person acting with permission of the owner.
SECTION 16: Combined Collection. Wrapped garbage, non-
combustible and combustib a rubbish may be placed in the same refuse
receptacle for combined collection.
SECTION 17: Collection Frequency. All refuse generated by
residential units shall be collected a minimum of once a week.
SECTION 18: Garbage and Refuse Accumulation. Every person
owning or occupying any building, lot or premises in the City shall keep
such property in a clean and sanitary condition and shall not cause or
permit garbage or combustible rubbish to accumulate for more than one
(1) calendar week, or cause or permit non - combustible rubbish to accumulate
for more than one (1) calendar month. Any accumulation of refuse for a
Ordinance No.
Page 5
period of time in excess of the times prescribed in this section is
hereby declared to be a public nuisance, and said public nuisance may be
summarily abated upon order of the City Manager. All costs of abating
such public nuisance shall be charged against the person who had the
responsibility not to cause the accumulation.
SECTION 19: Dangerous and Infected Materials.
(a) No person shall place or deposit in any refuse
receptacle for collection pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance
any unbroken hypodermic needle, drugs, poisons, acids, dangerous chemicals,
explosives, or any other substance which might cause the death of or
injury to a human being.
(b) No person shall place in any refuse receptacle for
collection pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance any clothing,
bedding or other article which is contaminated by reason of being in
contact with a person or animal who has an infectious or contagious
disease. Such clothing, bedding or other article shall be disposed of
only in accordance with the directions of the County Health Officer.
SECTION 20: Dead Animals.
(a) No person shall place the body of any dead animal
upon or under any public or private property in the City except such
place or places designated for dead animal disposal by the City Manager.
(b) The owner of any dead animal shall cause the body to
be removed to a place designated by the City Manager, as soon as possible,
at the owner's expense. In the event the owner of a dead animal is
unknown, or cannot be immediately located, the City shall cause the
removal of such dead animal. Any employee of, or other person authorized
by, the City may enter onto private property for the purpose of disposing
of the bodies of dead animals.
(c) The City Council shall establish a charge for the
removal of dead animals, and said charge shall be collected from the
owner of any dead animal which is removed by the City.
SECTION 21: Contract for Collection, Removal and Disposal
of Refuse. T—he City may contract with persons or companies for the
col— letion, removal and disposal of refuse, which contract shall provide,
among other things, for the number of collections, manner of emptying
receptacles and obedience to sanitary regulations. Said contracts may
provide for a franchise fee, in an amount determined by the City Council,
to be paid to the City.
SECTION 22: Unauthorized Collectors. Except where a person
or company is authorized to continue col ection services pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 4272, it shall be unlawful for any person,
other than the holder of a current refuse contract with the City, to
collect or to remove any such receptacle from the place where the same
is placed by the person entitled to possession thereof, or to remove the
contents of any such receptacle. This section applies only to the
collection and removal of refuse from residential units.
Ordinance No.
Page 6
SECTION 23: Refuse Truck Reguti
laons. Any person or company
holding a re use contract with the City shall provide an adequate number
of vehicles and equipment expressly and especially designed for the
containment, collection and transportation of refuse. Said trucks shall
be equipped so as to prevent the spilling or dropping of any refuse or
liquid therefrom. Said trucks, when not in use, if kept within the
boundaries of the City, shall be kept only upon private property in a
zone which allows the parking of trucks. No refuse truck shall be
parked overnight in the City while partially or fully loaded with refuse,
unless due to breakdown or emergency, without permission of the City
Manager.
SECTION 24: Deposit of Waste Prohibited. It shall be
unlawful for any person to cause, or permit, any garbage, sewage, commercial
or, industrial waste, or waste of any other nature, to remain or be
deposited or discharged upon the surface of the ground on any public or
private property.
SECTION 25: Exceptions: Application and Appeal
(a) Any person desiring to secure an exception from any
provision of this Ordinance may apply therefore in writing to the City
Manager.
(b) The City Manager is authorized to grant exceptions
from the provisions of this Ordinance if he finds that all of the following
conditions exist:
(1) Granting the exception would not be detrimental
to the public health and safety;
(2) Not to grant the exception would result in
undue hardship to the applicant; and,
(3) The hardship which would result to the applicant
from not granting the exception is a hardship which would not generally
apply to other property in the City.
(c) The City Manager is authorized to exempt an occupant
of a residential unit from refuse collection charges if:
(1) The occupant agrees that he or the will not less
frequently than weekly remove all accumulated refuse from his or her
residential unit and dispose of the same at a disposal site approved by
the City Manager; and,
(2) The occupant maintains, and produces for inspection
upon request by the City, receipts evidencing that refuse from the residential
unit has been properly disposed of.
Ordinance No.
Page 7
(d) Any exception granted under sub - section (c) of this
section may be revoked and no further exception shall be granted if it is
found that such occupant is disposing of refuse at other than an approved
disposal site or if such occupant fails to produce disposal receipts upon
request by the City,
(e) Except for actions taken by the City Manager under
sub - sections (c) and (d) of this section, any action of the City Manager
in granting or denying an exception to the provisions of this Ordinance
shall be in writing and shall be served upon the applicant in person
or by mail and shall also be posted in three (3) public places within the
City. Any person residing or owning property within the City may appeal
such action of the City Manager to the City Council. The action of the
City Manager shall be final unless written notice of appeal is filed
with the City Clerk not more than ten (10) days following the date of
posting of the action by the City Manager. Any action of the City Manager
in granting or denying an exception under sub- section (c) of this section
or revoking an exception pursuant to sub - section (d) of this section shall
be in writing and shall be served upon the applicant and the collector
authorized to provide service to such residential unit in person or
by mail. The applicant may appeal such action of the City Manager to
the City Council. The action of the City Manager under sub - sections (c)
and (d) of this section shall be final unless written notice of appeal
is filed with the City Clerk not more than ten (10) days following the
date notice of the action by the City Manager is deposited in the mail or
personally delivered, as the case may be.
SECTION 26: Violations. Any person violating any of the
provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and
shall be punishable by fine of not more than $500.00 or imprisonment for
not more than six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Any violation continuing for more than one (1) day shall be deemed to be
a separate violation for each day said violation exists.
SECTION 27: Enforcement. It shall be the duty of the City
Manager to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance. The City Attorney,
upon request of the City Manager, shall institute any necessary legal
proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance including, but
not limited to, instituting an action for and obtaining an injunction
from a court of competent jurisdiction.
SECTION 28: Ordinance Number 117 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
is hereby Repeated.
SECTION 29: Sections 33.021 through 33.0233 of the County
Code adopted by Reference (Relating to Refuse Collection) are hereby
Repelaed.
SECTION 30: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
City Clerk shiest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the
same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at
least once in The Oaily Report, a newspaper of general circulation,
published in 6e—City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Ordinance No.
Page 8
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
CITY OF RANU-D Cl.'CAN1U' C.A
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 17, 1980 lull
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Butts, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Request to set January 21, 1981 as date for a Public
Hearing regarding the continuation of efforts and
expenditures for the purpose of establishing as Assess-
ment District for streets and storm drains in the
industrial area
The Council met in special session on December 11, 1980 to review
the Investigation Report for the proposed Assessment District 79 -1.
As discussed then, the street and storm drain system proposed for
construction by this District will allow development to occur
in a now unaccessible part of the City's industrial area. Approx-
imately eleven million dollars in improvements and associated
costs will be financed by the proposed bond issue.
By its action tonight, the Councilwill begin the process of estab-
lishing the District by agreeing to a public hearing on the feas-
ibility of assessing the property in question.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolutions
adopting a map showing the general nature, location and extent
of the construction of certain public works of improvement in
showing proposed boundaries of the assessment district; designating
persons to perform various duties for special assessment proceeding
covering preliminary determination and ordering the preparation of
a report on said improvement; and approving the report under the
protest act of 1931 and fixing a date for public hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
LBII: PAR: jaa
Attachments
A11ERICAN PUBLIC %**'ORKS ASSOCIATION
CHAIRVAN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER
Noel L. C —Ceien
.eewem, ec E19mems (6 RIVERSIDE /SAN BERNARDINO BRANCH
26x) Soutn Waterman Are.
Sane
92,1-2
p1V ez4.xa20
DIRECTORS The flooding problems encountered during the 1979 -80
C. Glenn wlll..
hinter severely tested the capabilities of public
nro m sen eenemmo
Sao.......... C.et officials in Southern California. In an effort to
San Bermrtllno,CA 9it1e
I >14I 3e3-1025 recognize the capable manner in which the public
N." I. Te..enl officials coped with the problems, the Southern
CI.e. Cleo." Ro.A
P
California Chapter, Riverside /San Bernardino
c °.mr m Rireslo<
R.o. e.. toga
RLellee. CA 92902 Branch of the American Public Works Association
(7141 787.2434
adopted the enclosed Resolution of Appreciation.
This resolution is presented to your agency with
a deep appreciation of the services you provided
the public during this difficult time.
Very truly yours, .�--
t✓.L'LCc.l /�- ..alt -ci
Allen Hofine' er
Secretary /T elasuTer
November 251 1980
VICE CHAIRMAN
R°Ie IInO A. 0—lele
Clly En91n.n
CITY of Cole"
,,C, EN "." Street
Omarm.CA 91161
,1,, 613
Honorable
Mayor and City Council
City
of Rancho
Cucamonga
SEC, TREASURER
9320
Base
Line Road
Al::. HnIm.Ieter
S. ReR,eenOine
Alto
Loma,
California 91701
19."w. n.ao. cn.
Soo EIC a ceee"2 el-
Rlren CA 92102
21,
(714) !25.4636
DIRECTORS The flooding problems encountered during the 1979 -80
C. Glenn wlll..
hinter severely tested the capabilities of public
nro m sen eenemmo
Sao.......... C.et officials in Southern California. In an effort to
San Bermrtllno,CA 9it1e
I >14I 3e3-1025 recognize the capable manner in which the public
N." I. Te..enl officials coped with the problems, the Southern
CI.e. Cleo." Ro.A
P
California Chapter, Riverside /San Bernardino
c °.mr m Rireslo<
R.o. e.. toga
RLellee. CA 92902 Branch of the American Public Works Association
(7141 787.2434
adopted the enclosed Resolution of Appreciation.
This resolution is presented to your agency with
a deep appreciation of the services you provided
the public during this difficult time.
Very truly yours, .�--
t✓.L'LCc.l /�- ..alt -ci
Allen Hofine' er
Secretary /T elasuTer
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER
RINIrRSIDEISAN BERNARDINO BR#NCH
WHEREAS, the Ameti-an Pubekc (APEA) cv(,hp-� tv" ex; — t , 1,
�/6 a h
1. pplcc�dticn to t 06 0.4
u6 the sexWas 6&-od eems A ccu a3s(5ted ot the hand�tmg
4. csuU ('5 the (wsca-
Aonat , aims o� the go c#nte and
EREAS, the "iclatt i co"kitmea;. E,
y cc E5 tc Loch
stet the w��he and *,jet# c .A t& pubttk3 Ed
4
EREAS, q eye oO ju. am4 c a
_(y 1w0ed :1
millimi it en e hfiiaidl,-
�� ivm jVc,(kd koAtitkn#cutd *aocis, acid`
n-
�tjmcat the ,�Aia�a6 c
Rivet s adg,,San 8Mna%*e,- ttittu, tU beUk, naitbd c4firtae did
11 EREAS, ping' t%lke vi,4 cc agenc(a,
I a ,stance c4:',!P'Z fi*zany Pic-
Afems caul - b!4.41 k
dkn�.
A
tx, 4
Ud ALK 13. HL' S'laklCh k!A
NOW, T REFO 77 so he Ikt-cl c/ ftbeit ',s Associat,
so�k therm o*tv; C4 tile At,,cEj4an Rulbeit
a e xtnc s 5 f j pi and i"ZOiL101d gnat' be extende
ency cont
1 y t8 t to pictetlit city and ct ir
I that wcwK beck, 'ing had Re
11ce u, tho6
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
No L CHUSTENSEN
Chaff man
ROIALINO A. OA141ELS
v(u cnatiplan
ALLEN HOFMEISTER
rr OF R, ,i A
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Commnunity Center,
9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, December 17, 1980. The
meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who led in
the flag salute.
Present: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon. D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Arthur
H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser.
Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, Samuel Crowe;
Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam;
City Planner, Barry Hogan; Finance Director, Harry Empey; Community Services
Director, Bill Holley.
Absent: City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs.
Approval of Minutes: Councilman Mikels requested the following changes:
Page 3 of November 18 minutes, first paragraph to be "Councilman Mikels noted that
the Fire District was considering a requirement of future developers to provide at
least the fire station facilities for the District. That would result in some re-
duction of the total finances needed to set up an additional substation where iL is
needed. In addition, Mr. Mikels noted that the oeprating costs of the District
would continue to increase annually. Perhaps at some point the District may be
unable to provide any personnel for new stations."
Councilman Frost requested the following change on page 7 of the November 19th
minutes: "Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to authorize the mayor to
send a letter to the Board of Supervisors apprising them that the Council has
directed the city attorney to investigate the feasibility of proceeding with legal
action. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0."
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to approve the minutes as corrected.
Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
a. Advisory Commission will be meeting on Monday, December 22, at 6:00 p.m, in
the Lion's Park Community Center just prior to the Planning Commission meeting.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
Staff requested that item "d" be removed since the applicant was working with the
staff to resolve the problems.
a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 80 -12 -17 for $560,570.95.
b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for R. Michael and Pamela L. McKenna;
The Hole in the Wall Deli, 9668 Base Line Road, Off -Sale Beer and Wine.
c. Authorization for City Manager, Assistant Citv Manager, Finance Director,
Community Services Director, and Council to attend the Employee Relations
Institute, January 21 -22 in San Francisco.
d --- Regaeel-e e- eel- peb}} e- heer4nE-4 er- daneery- 3;- }98 }- fer- eppee }_ef- p}enning
6emnieaien- dee }e }en- denying- B }reeeer- Rer}eh- 80 -38. Item removed from agenda.
e. Release of Bonds:
Tract 9440: located on the west side of Hermosa, 500+ feet north of Banyan.
Owner: Chevron Construction Co.
Performance Bond (landscaping) $42,683.30
Tract 9636: located south of Lemon Avenue and west of Archibald Avenue.
Owner: Crismar Development Corp.
Cash Staking Bond $ 1,500.00
f. Approval of Flood Control Agreement for Deer Creek Bridges. It is
recommended that Council approve the agreement between the City and the San
Bernardino County Flood Control District for the construction of the Deer
Creek Bridges, Zone I, Fiscal Year 80 -81.
g. Parcel Nap 3534: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement.
It is recommended that Council accept bonds and agreement for off -site improve-
ments at 8805 Hidden Farms Road.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -112
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVE24ENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR 8805 HIDDEN FARMS ROAD (PARCEL MAP 3534).
h. Approval of Parcel Hap 5130: It is recommended that Council authorize
the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the subject map. The map consists of
three parcels located on the east side of Amethyst, south of 19th Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -113
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL HAP NUMBER 5130.
i. Agreement Extension Request for Parcel Map 5269: H 6 S Properties, Inc.
has requested additional time to complete the improvement on Parcel Map 5269 to
complete the improvement on Parcel Map 5269 located east of Carnelian Street,
north of Hillside Road.
J. Acceptance of Tract Map 11461: It is recommended that Council accept the
subject tract map located on the northside of 19th Street, between Carnelian
Street and Beryl. Owners: Lewis Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -114
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
TRACT NUMBER 11461.
k. Cash Assignment Tract 9434: The subject tract developer, Chevron, has submitted
for City acceptance a $5,000 cash assignment. It is recommended that Council direct
the Finance Director to sign the assignment letter on behalf of the City, thus accept-
ing said assignment and placing the same on deposit with the City.
1. Purchase of Real Property by County Flood Control: The Countv Flood Control
has declared its intention to purchase lands for use as flood control right- of -wav
in Rancho Cucamonga. Under Section 3775 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the City
is required to give its approval so that the property may be purchased.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels for approval of the Consent Calendar
with the exception of item "d" which was removed. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
4A. SUBUiVISION ORDINANCE. Mr. Wasserman recommended that the item be continued
to the January 7, 1981 meeting. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to
continue the hearing of the Subdivision ordinance No. 28 -B to the January 7, 1981
City Council meeting. Motion approved unanimously 5 -0.
48. AN UINANCE RECOGNIZING HISTORIC LANDMARKS. Staff report by Bill Holley.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 128. Motion: Moved by Mikels,
seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
ORDINANCE NO. 128 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
ETIWANDA RAILWAY STATION, THE EMERY HOUSE, AND
THE ETIWANDA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH AS SIGNIFICANT
HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE
DESIGNATING EACH AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was
Leonard Gorczvca, Chairman of the Historical Comisssion, who recommended adoption
of the Ordinance. There being no further public response, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
Councilman Bridge stated that the Stobie house on Beryl was also a Sears and Roebuck
home. Perhaps this one also warrants an historical designation..
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to set January 7, 1981 for second
reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
4C. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR DESIGNATION AS CITY
POINTS OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. Staff report by Bill Holley.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 129. Motion: Moved by Mikels,
seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
ORDINANCE NO. 129 (first-reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
AGGAZZOTTI WINERY, SCHOWALTER GROVE ARCHAELOGICAL
SITE, AND THE GEORGE AND JESSIE JOHNSTON HOME AS
SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE CITY, AND
THEREFORE, DESIGNATING EACH AS A POINT OF HISTORIC
INTEREST.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Leonard Gorczyca, Chairman
of the Historical Commission, spoke about the Schowalter Grove Archaelogical Site.
He said there was no wav to preserve this area, but he had taken extensive pictures
all during the excavation of the site. There is evidence that this area was used
in the making and curing of bricks which were used in the local area. There being
no further public comment, the Mayor closed the public hearing.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to set January 7, 1981 for second
reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
4D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -02 - LESNEY. Barry
Hogan presented the staff report.
A change of zone request from R -1 -5 (single family) to P.D. (planned development)
for 10 acres located on the northwest corner of Hermosa and Base Line Road, and
the development of a 117 lot townhouse development consisting of 114 dwelling
units. APN 202- 182 -13.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 130. Motion: Moved by Palombo,
seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
ORDINANCE NO. 130 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 18213 FROM R -1 -5 TO P.D. FOR
10 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
HERMOSA AND BASE LINE ROAD.
Councilman Mikels asked about the drainage at the intersection of Hermosa and
Base Line and if this intersection would he improved at the same time the develop-
ment went in. Mr. Hogan said the improvements along Base Line would improve the
drainage also. The development would improve the north side along Hermosa, but
engineering is looking at the other corners to see if improvements could be made
at the same time.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
he closed the hearing.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Frost to set January 7, 1981 for second reading.
Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
4E. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AGREEMENTS.
Mr. Wasserman introduced the item, then turned the meeting over to the City Attorney
to explain the changes.
Councilman Mikels asked for an explanation as to what we were doing since a new
ordinance number had been assigned to the ordinance. Mr. Crowe explained that since
this was an entirely new Ordinance, a new number had been assigned. He assured
Council that the old Ordinance No. 117 would be stamped repealed. Also, this
referred to the new Resolution which appeared before Council, Resolution No. 80 -120.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 132. Motion: Moved by Mikels,
seconded by Palumbo to waive further reading. The motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
ORDINANCE NO. 132 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE
NO. 117 AND PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL, COLLECTION,
AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting far public hearing. Those addressing Council were:
Mel Hamner. He felt the incentives had been taken out of the competition by the
granting of franchises and the Companies could adjust Zees as they wished.
John Rose. He stated that the new ordinance was still directed toward the citizens
and noc the companies. He also expressed dissatisfaction with the prepavment plan.
Eugene Bianchin. Also stated opposition to the prepayment plan.
T. H. Moodv, 1,466 euckthorne. He expressed opposition to the mandatory section.
There being no further public comment, the Mayor closed the public hearing.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to set January 7, 1981 for second
reading of Ordinance No. 132. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mr. Wasserman then introduced Resolution No. 80 -120. He stated that the resolution
established rates for residential units throughout the City, set rates for citizens
over 62 years of age, and set a penalty for non - payment.
Mayor Schlosser suggested the amount for senior citizens be set at $1.00 per month
off the regular amount. Councilmen Bridge and Mikels said the concurred with this.
Councilman Mikels stated that there had been different rates throughout the City.
He said that $5.50 was the last rate before the unapproved rate had been put into
effect. He said the Resolution should reflect the $5.50 per month rate.
Councilman Mikels suggested that the rates in Resolution No. 80 -120 be set
at $5.50 per month and set the Senior Citizens rate at $4.50 per month as a uniform
rate throughout the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga. Councilman Frost suggested
that the penalty for non - payment section be deleted.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:
John Rose. He said there should be special exemptions for those who were under
62 years of age, but had special financial burdens. Mr. Wasserman said these could
be handled on an individual basis. Mr. Rose said he was still against the pre-
payment plan.
Ed. Hamilton, Church Street. He said he would like to see a special rate for those
who used the large bins. Mr. Wasserman said these were considered commercial and
the ordinance and resolution dealt only with the residential.
There being no further public response, the Mayor closed the public hearing.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to adopt Resolution No. 80 -120 with
the suggested rates of $5.50 per month and $4.50 per month for senior citizens,
with a uniform rate throughout the city, to delete the penalty for non - payment
section, and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. City
Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 80 -120.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -120
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CHARGES
FOR THE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE IN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
Regarding the Franchise Agreements: Council concurred in sending a letter to the
Refuse Companies with a copy of the franchise agreement signed by the Mayor. Sample
letter had been presented to Council in the agenda packet. Mr. Wasserman suggested
that Council read the report which had been submitted by Yukon Disposal Company.
Council concurred, and acknowledged for public record that they had received the
report from Yukon Disposal.
Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 8:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:45 p.m.
with all members of the Council present.
4F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -15 - LANDMARK. Staff report
was presented by Barry Hogan.
A change of zone from A -1 (limited agricultural) to R -2 (two family residential)
for 12 acres located west of Beryl, south of Mignonett. APN 202- 032 -71.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance He. 131. Motion: Moved by Palumbo,
seconded by Frost to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
ORDINANCE NO. 131 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 202- 032 -71 FROM A -1 TO R -2 FOR 12
ACRES LOCATED WEST OF BERYL, SOUTH OF MIGNONETTE.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was
Mr. Bill Blanchard, 131 Avalon Street. He expressed concern about the A -1
section and about the direct access to the project.
There being no further public comment, the Mayor closed the public hearing.
Council expressed concern about the access problem, but decided to set January 7,
1981 for second reading of the Ordinance. In the meantime, each Councilman would
inspect the area personally.
4G. VACATION OF A PORTION OF CENTER AVENUE. A public hearing on the vacation of
6 feet of right -of -way on the east side of Center Avenue between Foothill Boulevard
and Church Street. The vacation has been requested by the Data Design Corporation.
Staff report was presented by Paul Rougeau.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was
Mr. Ed. W. Baker, Data Design Laboratories.
Councilman Frost expressed concern that if we had basically incompatible uses border-
ing one another -- residential versus commercial -- that there should be additional
buffering provided for the residents. He also said that he is not convinced that
Center Street might not become a more intense north /south carrier than it is now.
For that reason, he felt it would be better to proceed with the vacation in six to
eight months from now when we have a better look at what the City will be like in
the future and the General Plan is adopted.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palumbo to grant the vacation request with the
approved maintenance agreement with Data Design Laboratories, to approve Resolution
No. 80 -89, and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: Frost. ABSENT: None.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 80 -89.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE
VACATED A PORTION OF CENTER AVENUE AS SHOWN ON
MAP NO. V -008 ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
5A. PROJECT E,SPERANZA MID -YEAR BUDGET REQUEST. Project Esperanza is requesting
$5,283 to supplement the recreation and administration portion of their program.
Staff report by Bill Holley.
Mavor Schlosser opened the meeting for public input. Speaking to Council Was
Dr. Navarro, Executive Director of the National Institute for Community
Development. Dr. Navarro explained the purpose of the request.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Bridge to deny the request considering
the time of year and the city's budget constraints. Motion carried unanimously
5 -0.
5B. PROPOSED SPECIAL STATEWIDE ELECTION OF JUNE 2 1981 TO DETERMINE THE FATE
OF THE PERIPHERAL CANAL. Report was presented by Lauren Wasserman.
Assemblyman Ross Johnson and Senator Ruben Ayala have introduced urgency
legislation, AB -9, which would call a statewide election to determine the fate
of the Pheripheral Canal. Without the canal, Southern California would need
extra time to develop alternative water supplies with the impending loss of
Colorado River water.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve the support of AB -9.
Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
5C. EQUESTRIAN/HIKING TRAILS ON FLOOD CONTROL RIGHT -OF -WAY. Staff report presented
.by Jack Lam.
It was staff's recommendation that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 80 -115
and to direct staff to prepare a letter for the Mayor's signature to the Board of
Supervisors asking for their cooperation in the use of the Flood Control right -of-
ways for equestrian /hiking trail purposes.
Councilman Bridge said that for a number of years the citizens have been trying
to get the use of the flood control right -of -ways for the use of hiking and
equestrian trails,
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to take strong action to use the flood
control right -of -ways for equestrian /hiking trail purposes by sending a strongly
worded letter to the Board of Supervisors stating we would not want to preclude the
use for other than flood control use when other uses are feasible. Also, to approve
Resolution No. 80 -115 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously
5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 80 -115.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -115
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXPRESSING CONCERN
AND DESIRE FOR THE USE OF FLOOD CONTROL RIGHT -OF-
WAYS FOR EQUESTRIAN /HIKING TRAIL PURPOSES.
5D. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS FOR THE ESTABLISID Ml OF AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT.
Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs.
Mr. Hubbs turned the meeting over to Mr. Walt Hamilton who presented the boundaries
of the Assessment District.
Mr. Brown presented the procedures necessary to form the Assessment District.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public input. Concern was expressed by Mr.
Doug Hone that we should not proceed with the setting of the public hearing until
after the Chamber's meeting which would be the next day.
Joe DiIorio expressed that this would only be the setting of a public hearing
on January 21. Small groups would have plenty of time to meet to discuss
the assessment district before that hearing date. It would be at the public
hearing that all continents should be made, he said. He recommended that the
Council proceed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to continue action on this item
to the January 7, 1981 City Council meeting. The motion carried by the following
vote: AYES: Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: Frost. ABSENT: None.
Councilman Frost said he voted against this motion since he did not feel it would
preclude the Chamber from providing input so we could have continued the hearings
as scheduled.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none.
7. COUNCIL MATTERS.
7A. REPORT REGARDING THE JOINT FEASIBILITY STUDY ON THE FIRE DISTRICT. Council-
man Mikels presented a report from the Feasibility Study Committee of which he
was Chairman. He said that both the Fire District and the City had financial
constraints; that it would not be feasible for the Fire District to be absorbed
into the city at this time. But at some point in the future, perhaps when we
get the regional shopping center, would be better timing. He stated that the
Fire District will be seeking voter approval for additional funds.
8: ADJOURNMENT.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Frost to adjourn to an Executive Session
not to reconvene. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at
10:20 p.m.
Respectively submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk