HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980/06/18 - Agenda Packet.0
CITY OF
RANCHO CLUANIOVC:A
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Regular Meeting
June 18, 1980
AGENDA ITEMS: All items submitted for the City Council agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and
third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
I. CALL TO ORDER.
A. Pledge to flag.
B. Roll Call: Bridge, Palombo_, Mikels_, Frost, Schlosser_
C. Approval of Minutes of June 4, 1980.
• 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
a. Advisory Commission meeting, Thursday, June 26, 6:30 p.m., Lion's Park
Community Center.
b. First Annual Spring Clean -up Campaign through June 21.
c. Planning Commission Appointments.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 80 -6 -19 for $269,783.70. 1
b. Set public hearing for July 2, 1980 for Zone Change No. 80 -07 -
C. H. Brubaker. A zone change from R- 1- 20,000 to R -1- 10,000
for property located on the southeast corner of Banyan and
Amethyst Street. Assessor's parcel No. 1062- 401 -11.
C. Set public hearing for July 2, 1980 for appropriation of
Revenue Sharing Funds.
d. Award of Street Tree Maintenance Contract. It is recommended 3
that West Coast Arborist, Buena Park, as low bidder be awarded
the contract. Approximate total cost: $2,156.00.
e. P -quest purchase of 100 decor tile plaques at a cast of 16
$1,086.00 plus tax from Recognition Inc, Sante Fe Springs.
Funds to be appropriated from contingency account.
•
City Council Agenda -2- June 18, 1980
f. Refer claim for damages in the amount of $1,547.09 by Gary 17
Guy to the City Attorney for handling.
g. Tact 9637: Acce [ante of ap, Bonds, an Agreementi. 22
er: Chevron Co ructi Co, Locatio Northeot
co her of Amethyst a d on on 31 lots totaling 11.6
Pei ormance Bond (7s rety) �, $200,Og0.
Lobo S Material /(su ty) `,$200,060,
AESOL ION N/p'/ 80 -55_-, 23
A`,RE Of. I( OF 'i{'B' CITY COON OF THE 1,
Cl' OF RANCHO CU ONGA, CAL FO IA,
AP OVING IMPROV AGRE ROVE -
M 'SECURITY, FI L MAP OF TRA NO.
9 37. ' ,
h. Parcel Map 5792: Acceptance of Map, Bonds, and Agreement, 39
Owner: Lewis Properties, Location: West side of
Archibald approxiamtely 470 feet north of Base Line;
• 3 lots on 16 acres.
Performance Bond (surety) $ 46,000.
Labor 6 Material (surety) $ 46,000
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -19 62 40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5792, (TENTA-
TIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5792), IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
i. Release of Bonds: 42
Tract 9083: Located north of Arrow Route and east of Hellman
Avenue. Owner: John C. Heers, Inc.
Cash Staking Bond $ 2,500
Tract 9083 -1.: Located north of Arrow Route and east of
Hellman Avenue. Owner: John C. Beers, Inc.
Cash Staking Bond $ 3,400
r]
City Council Agenda -3- June 18, 1980
Tract 9083 -4: Located north of Arrow Route and east of
Hellman Avenue. owner: John C. Beers, Inc.
Cash Staking Bond $ 2,950
Tract 9083 -5: Located north of Arrow Route and east of
Hellman Avenue. Owner: John C. Deers, Inc.
Cash Staking Bond $ 4,100
Tract 9225: Located north of Highland Avenue and west of
Carnelian Street. Owner: Thomas W. Kendall.
Cash Staking Bond $ 3,650
Tract 9446: Located on the west side of Baker between 8th
and 9th Streets. Owner: Kingsway Construction Co.
Performance Bond (block wall) $ 7,700
Tract 9454: Located on the west side of Haven Avenue north
of the Southern Pacific Railroad. Owner: Lewis Homes.
Performance Bond (road) $148,000
. Performance Bond (water) 34,800
Performance Bond (sewer) 40,800
Tract 9582 -2: Located on the north side of Wilson Avenue at
Beechwood Drive. Owner: Deer Creek Company.
Performance Bond (road) $138,000
Parcel Map 4594: Located at the northeast corner of Jersey
Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Owner: C 6 L Homes.
Performance Bond (road) $131,500
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A. AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE GARRETT AND COMPANY WINERY AS AN 45
HISTORIC LANDMARK,
The Garrett and Company Winery, commonly referred to as the
Virginia Dare Winery, located at the northwest corner of
Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, is recommended for a
City Historic Landmark designation.
ORDINANCE NO. 109 (second reading) 45
AN ORDINANCE. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
GARRETT AND COMPANY WINERY AS A SIGNIFICANT HIS-
TORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIGNA-
TING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK.
•
•
I �
U
City Council Agenda
-4-
B. AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 105, THE PARK DEDICATION
ORDINANCE.
An addition was drafted by the City Attorney and approved
by the City Council to Ordinance No. 105 at the June 4
City Council meeting.
ORDINANCE NO. 105 -A (second reading)
AN ORnrpnvrp np Tup CITY OnONrTT. OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 105.
C. REDUCTION OF SPEED LIMIT ON A PORTION OF SAPPHIRE STREET.
June 18, 1980
A revision to Ordinance No. 39 redesignating the speed limit
from 45 mph to 40 mph on Sapphire, 19th Street to Banyan
Street.
ORDINANCE NO. 39 -8 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 39 PERTAINING TO THE SPEED LIMIT ON SAPPHIRE
STREET.
D. POSTPONEMENT OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AS A CONDITION OF SUB-
DIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT - (REVISION TO ORDINANCE NOS. 28
AND 58).
Proposed revisions to Ordinances 28 and 58 to allow post-
ponement of street improvements where it is physically in-
feasible to construct improvements at the current time.
Postponements would be granted by the City Engineer. Where
improvements are postponed, a lien agreement for future
construction will be provided.
46
4A
47
1A
48
ORDINANCE NO. 28 -A (first reading) 49
w�
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF�gj
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,TO AMEND A PORTION
OF THE ORDINANCE TO SUPPLEMENT AND IMPLEMENT
THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. `
ORDINANCE NO. 58 -8 (first reading) 51
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
N0, 58 TO PERMIT THE USE OF LIEN AGREEMENTS AS
SECURITY FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF OFF -SITE
IMPROVEMENTS.
City Council Agenda -5- June 18, 1980
E. INDUSTRIAL AREA STORM DRAIN POLICY. 52
Review of recommendation to establish special impact zone
between Haven and Milliken, north of the Saute Fe Rail-
road to Arrow Route. Council will also review options
related to increases in storm drain fees in the Industrial
Area.
F. CONTINUATION OF HEARING ON ADOPTION OF PROPOSED CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1980 -81.
The City Council has given consideration to a proposed
Program of Service for the next fiscal year totaling
$8,717,325. Of that total $6,567,122 represents general
fund expenditures while special funds expenditures will
total $1,167,502.
The proposed budget submitted to the City Council includes
the addition of approximately 15 employees assigned to the
Finance Department, Engineering Division, Planning Division,
Community Services Department, and the Sheriff's Department.
• In addition to the five new deputies funded by the Office of
Traffic Safety grant, the Council has also approved the
addition of one detective and a detective sergeant. It is
anticipated that the addition of these two employees will
have some impact on our efforts to decrease the residential
burglar problem in the community. The additional employees
will also free up sheriff's personnel to work on the Neighbor-
hood Watch and other crime prevention programs.
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
A. PROJECT ESPERANZA FUNDING REQUEST. Report by Bill Holley.
B. AWARD OF STREET SWEEPER CONTRACT. Report by Lloyd Hubbs. 53
Bids have been received for the acquisition of a vacuum
type street sweeper as previously authorized by the Council.
Low bidder was Haaker Equipment Company at $71,990.06. It
is recommended that the contract be awarded.
10
•
is
City Council Agenda
-b1
June 18, 1980
C. SHERIFF'S CONTRACT.
Report
by
Capt. Tom Wickum.
55
D. SUPPORT OF RAISED LANDSCAPE MEDIAN ISLANDS FOR FOOTHILL 72
BOULEVARD. Report by Jack Lam.
A Resolution of the Planning Commission recommending
support of the installation of raised medians on Foot-
hill Boulevard to increase the visual aethetics and
safety of Foothill Boulevard was adopted by the Planning
Commission. This Resolution is necessary due to Caltrans'
opposition to raised landscape median islands.
RESOLUTION NO. —tis 5 73
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO CALTRANS
FOR REQUIRING RAISED LANDSCAPED MEDIAN ISLANDS
ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AS DEVELOPMENT OCCURS FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SPECIAL BOULEVARD DE-
SIGNATION OF THE GENERAL PLAN.
E. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AUTHORITY FOR VARIOUS FEES. ��� "'� 75
Report by Harry Empey.
Consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's new budget
requirements to comply with the City's analysis of Propo-
sition 4, it is necessary to establish several new funds.
These include the Capital Replacement Fund, Insurance Fund,
Capital Reserve Fund, Benefit Contingent Fund, and Central
Service Fund. It is recommended that Council adopt the
necessary Resolutions to create these new fund categories
and establish the special appropriations.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -57 77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
A CAPITAL REPLACEMENT FUND.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -58 78
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
AN INSURANCE FUND,
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -59 79
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
A CAPITAL RESERVE FUND.
City Council Agenda -7- June 18, 1980
• RESOLUTION NO. 80 -60 80
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
BENEFIT CONTINGENT FUND.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -61 81 `
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
CENTRAL SERVICES FUND.
F. ADOPTION OF A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR BASE LINE. BOULEVARD 82
BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE. Report by
Paul Rougeau, Associate Civil Engineer.
A specific plan for Base Line is needed to guide the
development of the pertinent portion of Terra Vista and to
provide the San Bernardino County Flood Control District
with a location for the Deer Creek bridge.
• G. PROPOSED POSITION CLASSIFICATION PLAN.
Doug Ayres, consultant, will be presenting the proposed
position classification and compensation plan to the City
Council for review and approval. Mr. Ayres was retained
by the City to develop a modern classification plan com-
plete with job descriptions for all city positions. The
classification plan is the first phase In the ultimate
development of a modern merit personnel system.
H. RECOMMENDATION TO IMPLEMENT DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM. 84
Report by Lauren Wasserman.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council
approve Resolution No. 80 -54 implementing a deferred
compensation program. It is significant to note that funds
have been included in the 1980 -81 budget for this program.
Implementation date will be July 1, 1980,
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -54 85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN
EMPLOYEES' DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AND
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH GLENDALE FEDERAL
SAVINGS FOR COORDINATING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY EMPLOYEES' DEFERRED COMPENSATION.
City Council Agenda -8- June 18, 1980
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
8. ADJOURNMENT.
•
•
8867 CITY vF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WARR O VF +� k V E N D O R N A M E
00631 7" 5 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT S
00632 5; -,C INLAND POWER SWEEPING
00633 64 "9 KISHEN. CHRISTINE
•00634 26 GI WILLIAM CUTHBERT INC
00635 17(;0 BANK OF AMERICA
00636 83i3 SAN BRAIDING CO EMPLOY C
00637 4i-. }0 GLENDALE FEDERAL SAVING
OC638 6`77 KASLER CORPORATION
00639 IT,C BEARD. NAOMA
00640 9: ;0 WELLS FARGO TRUSTEE
00641 79 5 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT S
00643 5'60 INLAND POWER SWEEPING
03974 13,c BEARD. NAOMA
03977 1B<8 C E E LUMBER CO
03988 2CC1 WILLIAM CUTHBERT INC
03989 26i3 , F M ASSOCIATES
0401984 5i10pp IBMMp SS tt 77
04144 Vi .'!C FOR15 ALIRMENT
04150 VOIC FORMS ALIGNMENT
1 6
'..i0
"6
�5
P "0
0
X10
':3 JUMN C HE
:0 (ON
LL
,'.0 JIN NEZ,
75 JOBS AVAI
'r'.2 KENT LAND
,:6 KRA4L, BA
r;E KRUS. , JO
r C LAIRD CON
0 LOGUE, SA
1 LOS ANGEL
'CO MARTI ION EZ,
'-0 ME41R;:S M
I' 4 MC MASTER 3 MIL S, FR
� 0 MUB L OIL
-5 MONAHAN,
IVE
MANAGE
RA SHO
OTTLING CO
OTTLING CO
N
SECURITY GR
ARDIND SHERI
CROWS
0 WAT:'R DIST
TINTING
ST CO
NT SUPPLY
ENSONE CO
INC
CT ASSOC
TION CO
4FS
HANIF
SERVICE
ES
B
IA
E OF C1TI
TIN
L SERVICE
WARRANT RE
WARR
DATE R
NET
5,765.42
297.50
287.29
530.00
4.985.00
317.00
240.00
13.00
1.239.63
5.41511.69
1�I7ON0
18.60 -
86.50-
53.00-
309.06-
1.263.68-
142.50
94.00
457.01
690.00
104.64
152.64
60.00
6,304.52
52.46
177.00
1,233.50
132.3
2
1,6
1
5.528.
4.260.
633.
8,000.
45.
68,014.
24.
2.
R867 CITY iF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WARR N V& M V E N 0 0 R N A M E
04205
8'.0
04206
8',:5
•04208
1 5
150.00
6/18/80
83,)s
04209
8 " 6
04210
84120
04211
85:5
04212
87,0
04213
V,5
04214
B(.'0
04215
8:`5
04216
V —,5
_! 042177
90.,0
6/18/80
9�'
04219
=0
04220
9.''10
04221
9'il: 5
04222
VCIO
•
1
C
WARRANT
WARR
OA TE
UNT NET
6/18/80
6/18/80
1 5
150.00
6/18/80
454.86
6/18/80
164.10
6/18/80
2,186.44
6/18/80
6/18/80
pp
1,551.33
6/18/80
154.80
350.81
6/18/80
2
6/18/80
63 1
3
63.31
6/18/80
250.00
6/18/80
148.77
6/18/80
234.99
6118/80
64.67
6/18/80
302.66
6/18/80
50.00
6/18/80
269,783.70
Ll
n
U
. is
CITY OF RANCHO CUG VKX\VA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 4, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor
SUBJECT: Street Tree Maintenance Contract for 1980 -81
Bids were received on May 30, 1980, for a citywide street tree service
contract to begin on July 1, 1980. The contract is divided into four tree
groups with four types of work that can be performed under each group. The
total of all the groups and work done derives a figure called the "Total
Group Charges ". This figure was used to evaluate the lowest bidder, the
results were:
West Coast Arborist $2156.00
Allied Tree $2249.00
Cal Arbor $4339.00
The above figure combined with the two categories under which the predominant
work will be done (Croup I and II, trimming of 12" trees) also reveals West
Coast Arborist the low bidder as follows:
Group I Croup II
West Coast Arborist $45.00 $45.00
Allied Tree $75.00 $75.00
Cal Arbor $70.00 $1,10.00
The City has approximately 26,000 trees and an anticipated budget of $49,000
for 1980 -81. Based on West Coast Arborist prices, the City can expect to
prune 1,100 trees minus emergency service work.
For planning consideration it should be pointed out the high cost for main-
taining Windrow Eucalyptus. The City currently requires the developer to
top, clean -up and thin out stands of Windrow Eucalyptus. The City's cost
has been nominal in this area to date. But down the road, the City will
be looking at a substantial financial consideration. It is estimated there
are 8,000 Windrow Eucalyptus within City right -of -way. Based on the two
lowest bidders average price under the 12" to 24" category, to prune all
the Windrow trees over a five -year period will require a commitment of
$136,000 per year for this type of tree alone.
RECOMMENDATION: Based on the lowest total group charges and the extensive
municipal tree trimming experience by the Company, it is recommended that
West Coast Arborist, Buena park, California be awarded the contract.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CALIFORNIA
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS, CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS
FOR
CITY -'WIDE STREET TREE SERVICES
CONTRACT
• James C. Frost, Mayor Lauren Wasserman, City Menager
Art Bridge Jack Lam, Community Development Directoi
John Mikels Lloyd Hobbs, City Enoineer
Michael Palombo
Phillip Schlosser
MARCH, 1930
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Ennineering Division
934' Base Line, Unit B
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
714- 989 -1851
B. SPECIFICATIONS
1. Method of Trimming Deliquescent Trees: (Group I)
Trees with diffuse branching habit such as Elms, Ash and Maples •
a. Remove all limbs to thirteen (13)feet of clearence from top
of curbline.
b. Remove all suckers,water sprouts, crisscrossing, dead,
diseased, broken, heavily laden.ed branches, and enough
less desirable branches to reduce crown weight by forty
percent (40%).
C. Remaining branches shall be radially distributed to form
scaffold branches in a circular space around the trunk, with
a vertical space of 18 - 24" if possible.
d. The crown shall form a symetrical half sphere with the weight
evenly distributed after prunning.
2. Method of Trimming Excurrent Trees: (Group II)
Trees with a dominant main trunk and small horizontal branches
such as Liquidambar, Pines and Cypress.
a. Remove all limbs to thirteen (13)feet of clearence from
top pf curbline.
b. Remove all suckers, water sprouts, crisscrossing, dead •
diseased, broken, heavily ladened 'branches, and - enough less
desirable branches to reduce crown weight by thirty percent
(30:,).
C. The finished tree shall form a pyramid shape.
3. Method of Trimming Palm Trees: (Group 111)
a. All dead or dropping fronds shall be removed as close to
the trunk as possible leaving five to seven healthy fronds
evenly spaced on top of trunk.
b. Upon completion, the tree trunk shall be cleared of all
frond remnants. Reinants shall be cleaned from trunk with
a tile knife or similar tool.
4. Nct'nod of trirrniri� Niid - ?.00 Eucalyptus: (Group I7)
a. •,o nt all li:::ht to thirteen (13) feet of clearance from top
of curbline.
b. Tr 4i tree. by first top;rinq at 40' height, then proceed is per
excurrent tree specification Nwinber 2 (above) Sections A and E.
Upon ro^p L +tion, tho tr" shall have a conical shapo with even •
distribution of rn;i.pit around main trunk.
55
COOTRACT P!.JPOS,,L
1. ITE' :IZED BID FOR14
Indicate charges for work to specific group and in accordance with the ap-
propriate trunk diameter at breast height or height. See Section 4 of
Contract Proposal.
2. GRG'IJP MF RGES
fif
6
Group I
Trunk Diameter
0 " -4"
4 " -12" 12" -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
$
$
S
$
Cost to Top
$
$
Cost to Trim
S
$
5
S
Cost to Remove
$
$
$
$
Group Ii
Trunk Diameter
0 " -4"
4 " -12" 12" -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
S
$
$
$
Cost to Top
$—
Cost to Trim
s
$
$
$
Cost to Remove
$
$
$
$
Group III
Tree Height
0' -20'
20' -40' 40' -over
TOTAL
•
Cost to Raise
Cost to Top
$
$
S
S
Cost to Trim
Cost to Remove
$
$
$
$
Group IV
Trunk Diameter
0" -12"
12 " -24" 24" -aver
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
$
$
5
$
Cost to Top
S
$
$
Cost to Trim
$
$
$
$
Cost to Remove
$
5
_
$
$
Cost to Remove
S
$
S
$
(leaving stump
18" in height)
TOTAL GROUP CHARGES
$
'I
3. EHERGGICY Cli,.RGCS
Ci:ornencv cha rres
shalt incl vde
all
pei;mvlcl, er,ul pn,ent and
any other
matarial used in
completing .ror'r..
A. ;Iiniiiu:n servicr
clargc soli
be
at the rate of
I
i
$
for
hours
D Charges boor ,rd
i.;i11id „";; tIi,te
shall
he at. the rat,, of
•per
hour
fif
6
d. 1REE GR'OUPS
Refer to the fol ln•o i nn groups whet; nreparinq cost for raisin;, tepnino,
trirrting or rerrvin^. Due to the broad nelure of ramp trees, •
certain types may be either excurrent or deliquescent.
Group 1 Deliquescent�'��
Elms 4 ,
Crape ntvI t I e
Carmnhors
etc.
G 1-0 up II Excurrent
Pines
I,iq•,ir,anbar• l
Cypress
Cedar )
Group III Palms r''✓1
Date CIr'ti,
Fan
Q..ieen II
Group 1V Wi rdrow EucaI ,i ttts
Eucalyptus glo"ulus )
1Cj
IV
•
0
5. Method of raising:
a. Remove all limbs to thirteen (13) feet of clearance from top
• of curbline.
6. Method of topping:
a. Topping shall consist of reducing the head size from the
tree crotch by twenty -five percent (25) for Group I R II
trees.
b. Group IV trees shall be topped at 40' in height.
7. Method of removing:
a. The :'Maintenance Supervisor will mark tree for removal with
a orange "P. Should a tree be scheduled for removal and
not marked, or if there is any doubt about the tree to be
removed, the Maintenance Supervisor shall be contacted
before work commences.
b. All trees shall be removed by sections, no single section
shall exceed five (5) feet in lenght.
C. Trunks and /or limbs (over 6" in diameter) shall be cut in
sections not to exceed five (5) feet in lenght and lowered
to the ground. The means of lowering shall be acceptable
to the City.
• d. All stumps and large surface roots shall be cut off at
ground level and ground to not less than twelve (12)inches
below existing grade.
B. Cuts
Small limbs, (less than one inch in diameter) including water
sprouts, and suckers shall be cut as close as possible to the
trunk or branch from which they arise.
Large limbs, (over one inch in diameter) shall be cut with a saw
using the following procedure. Make the first cut on the under
side of the branch, one to two feet from the crotch. The under-
cut should be at least 1/3 of the diameter. Make the second
cut on the branch topside one to three inches further from the
crotch than the first. (The livb should break off between the
t,ia cuts.)
The third cut, shall be nade at the point bi,ecLir�g the top angle
Or the crnLCn ,:nd a sir,i Uir point bisecting the lower angle of
attachment.
All cuts ov "'* 1" in di;. ter 511a11 be sealtA with an effective
wound drossin'.I, suet, as tree soal.
3
am
9. Removing Dead and Diseased Wood
The cut shall be made in healthy wood well below the infection,
twelve to eighteen inches, if possible.
All pruning tools (extension pruners, handsaws, power saws, •
loopers, hand pruners, and pruning knives) shall be sharp and
in good working condition.
When pruning diseased wood, pruning equipment shall be sterilized
with an effective disinfectant between each cut.
10, Climbing
Spikes shall not be used for climbing live trees, without written
permission of the Maintenance Supervisor.
11. Clean Up
The Contractor shall chip or remove brush as work progresses. The
street and parkway and private property shall be kept clean of
debris at all times. Any debris left upon the site after the close
of each day's operation shall be removed by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the cost deducted from the Contractor's Payment.
12. Equipment
bidders are required to have the following equipment available for
use in the City.
1 - skyworker •
1 - brush chipper
- pickup truck with two way radio
1 - stu -.p grinder
1 - 1 1/2 ton brush truer,
6 - chain saws
All equipment used for trimming or removal of city trees shall
be kept in good working order.
A representative of the Division of Engineering shall judge the
condition of equipment used. Any piece of equipment judged to be
unsafe shall be removed from the job site immediately,
Successful bidder, at the time of the execution of the contract,
shall provide California SLate certification of condition for his
skyworkcr.
13. Bork Schedule
a. Mork will be assigned and completed on a monthly basis.
b. Contractpr will •enure a lisL of ,ronthly projects from tho
D Nis(on of Engin ^orinq on the first weekday of each month,
c. I'p n.,hly proler,ts I'lu;t be completed prior to the end of the •
month they wero assigned.
7
d. Hours of normal operations
e. All work performed in the city, other than emergencies, shall
• occur between Mondays and Fridays from 8 o'clock A.M. to
5 o'clock P.M.
f. 41ork shall not occur, unless it is an emergency, on the
weekends or holidays.
g. Should inclimate weather or other acts of God prohibit
the contractor from working, then the contractors work schedule
will be adjusted to correspond with the same amount of time
that he was unable to work.
h. All changes as to the monthly work schedule must be approved
in advance by the Division of Engineering. Approved changes
will be issued to the contractor on a Field Order.
14. Emergency Tree Service
a. Contractor shall respond to emergency calls within two
hours from time of notification.
b. Contractor must designate a person within his company that
will respond to emergency calls 24 hours per day.
C. Contractor shall submit phone number(s) to the Division of
Engineering that can be used to obtain emergency service
• on a twenty four (24) hour basis. The contractor's name and
phone number will also be listed with the Sheriff's Department.
d. Upon arriving at an emergency situation it shall be the
responsibility of the contractor to eliminate all unsafe
conditions which would adversely effect the health, safety
or welfare of the public.
do
8
�0
TOTAL GROUP CHARGES $215&,00
3. EMERGENCY CHARGES
Emergency charges shall include all personnel, equipment and any other
material used in completing work.
A. Minimum service charge shall be at the rate of
S PI_, 0(7 for hours
G. Charges heyond minimum time shall be at the rate of
AL�o per hour 7pt'�,2 i1gi, .
CONTRACT PROPOSAL
Waa'T COAST Aru5orc.l5i
•1.
ITEMIZED BID FORM
Indicate charges
for work to specific
group and
in accordance
with the ap-
propriate trunk diameter
at breast height or
height. See Section
4 of
Contract Proposal.
2.
GROUP CHARGES
Group I
Trunk Diameter
0 " -4"
4 " -12"
12" -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
en
$) (700
$ Op
$Z_8 o,
Cost to Top
Cost to Trim
$5 "."
Cost to Remove
$,Z,<`O
$
Group II
Trunk Diameter
0 " -4"
4 " -12"
12" -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
$$ . °Q
V0,00
$oo
$may c�
Cost to Top
zo
$S.
bZc'•
rr
$g�� °L�
$ C�—
Cost to Trim
$5•'0
°O
$�C•
$4-S•�°
$po'
Cost to Remove
$Lo.
$S�•`"
$3O,
$ /
Group III
Tree Height
0' -20'
20' -40'
40' -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
$ Fl,0o
$$Po
BQ;�o
$2400
•
Cost to Top
$
$
$
$
Cost to Trim
$ C.0
$u'' $44i•
Cost to Remove
$�F•0, <'c
$�,O,r'c'
$Sp vt
Group IV
Trunk Diameter
0 " -12"
I2V4"
24" -over
TOTAL
Cost to
$ 0, O0
$ �,
$/�
$ q __. , o0
Cost to Top
Top
$ (.b
,$� /g.cn
0'
$L�—
Cost to Trim
$ h
$9c "r
$!0 0
$Z So. r•"
Cost to Remove
$
Cost to Remove
$r, C, JO
$. S`S ""
$!' %L'•''"
(leaving stump
18" in height)
TOTAL GROUP CHARGES $215&,00
3. EMERGENCY CHARGES
Emergency charges shall include all personnel, equipment and any other
material used in completing work.
A. Minimum service charge shall be at the rate of
S PI_, 0(7 for hours
G. Charges heyond minimum time shall be at the rate of
AL�o per hour 7pt'�,2 i1gi, .
BIDDER'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESP014SIBILITY -
TECHNICAL ABILITY AND EXPERIENCE .•
(The Bidder is required to state what work of a similar character to that
included in the proposed contract he has successfully performed and give
reference which will enable the City Council to judge his responsibility,
experience, skill and business training.)
The undersigned submits herewith a statement of his financial responsibility
The undersigned submits below a statement of the work of similar character
to that included in the proposed contract which he has successfully performed.
C� ,/4% d 4 .4iu' lb, C<4i C" 107-1'4 C
r
�r;V7 :?AC'; FLT --fry n.�•L.'�i�<a. rl /`F.'ty' �� i,�.•� < �.'.9n.'!�
,��L�tC (, i AII n f .C.� l Ae t �n' S � (�o ��t • 7 �C .
1LLi_li�� NF G,FFrCr \tnJ ��Oc'.Z , Q Cb�ca +T'�/
Z1'- (_�14M r� .�:1n1C'9<..IG(� �•f(, � "sr�r`/
— 7 T
1�
0
11
CONTRACT PROPOSAL F�L-Lt EC , TfLEc.
1. ITEMIZED BID FORM
'
Indicate charges
for work to specific group and in accordance with the ap-
propriate trunk diameter
at breast
height or
height. See Section 4 of
Contract Proposal.
,
2. GROUP CHARGES
Grouo I
Trunk Diameter
0 " -4"
4 " -12"
12" -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
$ °`
$
/7
$ e9
$ 3�• I
Cost to Top
$ /. "`
$
5
$ 7
Cost to Trim
$ I -D
>5-
$ - 75
Cost to Remove
$ /.
S
Sr-'
$ /2s
Group II
Trunk Diameter
0 " -4"
4 " -12"
12" -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
$ 3r,.
Cost to Top
$T, —
}t
s,
$�—
$ r6
Cost to Trim
S /C
$
Cost to Remove
$
So.
$ ; s
$
Group III
Tree Height
0' -20'
20' -40'
40' -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise'
S
$
I.'
$
Cost to Top
S /."
$�—
$�
S .—
;
Cost to-Trim
$ F
S
t!�
$ S5
Cost to Remove
$ 5_7n
$
!,e<
$ /tf»
$ 3,
Group IV
Trunk Diameter
0 " -12"
12 " -24"
24" -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
$
Cost to Top
Cost to Trim
i'c'
Cost to Remove
$
$
r7
$ T✓
$ -
Cost to Remove
$ N '
$
��' %'
S /j -c�
$ z 9�
(leaving stump
18" jn height
TOTAL GROUP CHARGES ''ff
3. EMERGENCY CHARGES
Crergency charges shall include all personnel, equipment and any other
material used in completing work.
A. Minirwm service charge shall be at the rate of
$� for .,Z hours
G. Charges beyond minirium tiiae shall be at the rate of
per hour
III
)3
Pj 0 1 rj Po « ra-n o) P R-o v � 0 ao .0 rj
Af�Ic -Illj ANp C-aP�2 ln�Cc ,
S -3o- oO C'�tyr o
0
0
CONTRACT PROPOSAL CI\(-_ A2t3oR
• 1. ITEMIZED BID FORM
Indicate charges for work to specific group and in accordance with the ap-
propriate trunk diameter at breast height or height. See Section 4 of
Contract Proposal.
2. GROUP CHARGES
Group I
Trunk Diameter
0 " -4"
4 " -12"
12" -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
$
$ �`i_.,`•
$ -i.
5 �<�
Cost to Tap
$ �•�
$ ��.
$ ?',
���
$_y'�_
Cost to Trim
Cost to Remove
$ /:J'.•
S.�+e ^.'-
$.;_
5 F�
$ ZO•
SL��'• •'
$
S •'��`f —
Group ii
0 " -4"
Trunk Diameter
4 " -12" 12" -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
$ —ri,—
�'?•—
-
$ •,
Cost to TOP
3
3, -L,c.
7f� "
$ (�- --�- -�
2v -"
Cost to Trim
Cost to Remove
$ 1 q-,
$
Group III
0' -20'
Tree Height
20' -40'ver,
v
TOTAL •,
Cost to Raise
S ' C, `
$
$—
5 �_•��
Cost to Top
$ 70`^
$
5
$___C_
$ /
Cost to Trim
Cost to Remove
b --
$_ !I -,v --
,�-�;
$ l.5�
^_.
$ R.2 ^; "'
-5•
$ 4.20. iO
Group IV
Trunk. Diameter
0 " -12"
12" -24"
24" -over
TOTAL
Cost to Raise
$.:2y °"
$ .h` %,=
$ • 7ri•
S �S n"
Cost to Top
Cost to Trim
Cost to Remove
5� "O•
h
S CL—
Cost to Remove
5['•`"
$ l.?,'r. `'
$ Pte:;.
5 7�'. '
(leaving stump 18" in height)
ua
TOTAL
GROUP CHARGES
3. EMERGE:0 CHARGES
Emergency charges shall include all personnel, equipment and any other
material used in cooipleting work.
A. 11inimujin service charge shall be at the rate of
w
$ Z,, ?? _ for
G. Charges beyond mininium tine shall be at, the rate of
$_- C. .e -` per hour
III )/
BIDDER'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
TECHNICAL ABILITY AND EXPERIENCE •
(The Bidder is required to state what work of a similar character to that
included in the proposed contract he has successfully performed and give
reference which will enable the City Council to judge his responsibility,
experience, skill and business training.)
The undersigned submits herewith a statement of his financial responsibility.
The undersigned submits below a statement of the work of similar character
to that included in the proposed contract which he has successfully performed.
•
X
15
J
•
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA �i �a•Mpl
MEMORANDUM °
a
June 13, 1980
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Wasseydl� r
City Manager
SUBJECT: City Hall Plaques
The City has received a proposal to purchase specially designed wall
plaques which would feature our City logo and would be available for the
City Council to award on special occasions such as when Council members
retire, key employees leave the City, or other Community -wide recognition
is appropriate. The plaques also would be given to our local State leg-
islators and to Congressman Lloyd for display in his office. Rancho
Cucamonga is the only City which does not have a plaque in the respective
legislative offices. The cost of the plaques ranges between $12.50 for
25 and $10.36 for 100. While the expense may seem high, we feel that the
purchase of 100 plaques now would hedge against future inflation and would
insure us of having a supply on hand for several years. Each plaque con-
sists of a 6 by 6 white tile imbeded in a 10 by 10 walnut veneer frame
in a gift box.
We have had an excellent response to the logo we are using on letter-
head, election ballots, business cards and other City items. We would,
therefore, like to proceed and order the plaques this year while funds
are still available rather than to wait until next year (July 1).
On Wednesday evening's City Council agenda, we have added a consent item
to purchase 100 plaques at a cost of $10.36 each. The plaques will be in
a single color with 22 carat gold trim in the appropriate places. If you
have a problem with the item, let us know and we will request that the
item be discussed at the Council meeting rather than handled as a consent
item. If you are not familiar with the plaques, I have several old ones
and a brand -new sample to illustrate the type of award we are talking about.
LMW /vz
CC/ Harry Empey, Finance Director
K�
•� Robed F. McDermott. President
1� ��w�77�� Brig. Gen., USAF (Retired)
USM Max H. Wier, Jr„ Senior Vitt President
ICJ
C i�lt1 GLRI<y Rq -nc,hu Gvcgm,;nf -H
P. o . acx R07
pAAAC CvGRm4•1E-/i7 CO. 91730
RE, CLAIM NUMBER: 509 %
POLICYHOLDER. GN1cY Eery
DATE OF LOSS. 3r7S•x0
_ AMT OF CLAI111 -Sj� "
L•9'80
29;?IVy0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA
ADMINISTRATION
JUN 101980
AM
718191101ll1>21112131415 6
USAA provides insurance coverage on the above named policyholder
Our Investigation reveals you were negligent in this occurrence. We are making demand
on you or your liability insurance carrier for the full amount of our loss
If you carry liability insurance, please forward this letter to your agent or claims adjuster.
If you do not have liability insurance, please contact this office within the next thirty
days to avoid legal action,
Very If fly yo st,,
.ftX SU ROGATFgO` DEPARTMENT
,.i.7
Uni1Gd Swriga Autgme6iN Arrociaticn USAA Budding, San Antonio, Texas 78288
JA 6t,pa-M I..1nix —f.ea rge
Ns 616 17
1971661
kt.,a
DAMAGE [ [VALUATION•AIFRAItINO 01 AUTOMO[ILL[ TRUCKt HPVY [OUIRIa[HT. IARM MACNIN[RY t IOATt 4. }F �f t
WESTERN APPRAISERS
SERVING: INLAND EMPIflE'
OF SAN BERNARDINO- RIVERSIDE ONTARIO TO ARIZONA NEVAOA F,y
BOROEq .,pi,�N'y
• 4040 EAST PIEDMONT DRIVE 9144
. HIGHLAND. CALIF. 92346/�.
TELEPHONE f7141 862.5450 Date
wc94//Jf V
Co. Claim No. - --
I•
Final Billing c/o WESTERN APPRAISERS OHiw_. v ` ` APDIa'— -b"'� OUR FILE NUMBER
Assured__
L.(r Claimant ;
MAKE VEAP MODEL BODY STYLE MOTOR NUMBER LICENSE N0. MILEAGE
ALLOWED PARTSIA
P '� AYE LABOR MATERIAL SUBLET
1 -ETA LS OF REPAIR AND nEILA N HOUR, IN R.S.
x
F
T /-
�:7d�3 --
• Y. '
/ - 15 a i Sim
F CE, TER
�2-
C/
} 2
THIS IS NOT A REPAIR' AUTHORIZATION
132 /IK
All , I., I nv,l be oblxn.d +: ++� onne 41 vehuc.
THIS DOES NOT VERIFY COVERAGE, NOR AN AGREEMENT TO WFOR REPAIR
For i /.-1 -� Lless OLd. SQL' CC the uRdcffgned
n �Iayces'to complete and guarantee all Ions repairs to the above vehicle. P.,H
Net P COI
NO SUPPLEMENTSSI WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL Y/S. Tax �% f
r �� ^ 1 7 /•,. %rl .� dl Sublet
Adv. Charge f �5•�
` ! / GRAND TOTAL f
by
iorm wAgol / L•,• - - -i ---
tv
•
a
�� r.:ae. �osrwvvwus• � � _..__
' J•tG 't r"�, Alf
E 3
a
T TRAM ITJC6E1 AMOUNT r ADJUSTER CODE
a -
IJ) 2995
_- -
_-
4s° - --
I
PAYEE - --
-
NATURE
ADDRESS
- - - -__-
OF
PMNT;
DRAFT ISSUANCE REQUEST
FORM
ICD
(
D/L
`?-MEM3ER0NLY
I'IECALNAME
_I LEGAL NAME /MORTGAGEE -
Umt
4
Foe Nanr //ll
Su0 01ST
I Sa =c9 TVOl.O [
PRTI _
IL1 FL LCO LcA
fl[ur pl- _
Drift u [
1� ['
210
1
--
- --
330
f330
- -
340
J 1'
344
G
CI t I Tvne j
R Amt
U 'tl
I R.
FOREIGNCOUNTRY
p f[
On[ FH
$up
c
FH GI Atl'v� Cnvv
A_c tlxn[ Town
210
t
AMOUNT -�
34D
I
34M1
Co, - rl n[ = Type
I I
R¢t Amt
O rle
CIL FR
CODE
I
1
L, ,
I
..
r..,.
y
�'.r I
f
j
Res
(CtL%____
T TRAM ITJC6E1 AMOUNT r ADJUSTER CODE
a -
IJ) 2995
_- -
_-
4s° - --
I
PAYEE - --
-
NATURE
ADDRESS
- - - -__-
OF
PAYMENT
CITY _ -- ._ -
-___ - -_ _.
- _ - ___..
STATE /PROV
____ ___
_ _ ____
ZIP
FOREIGNCOUNTRY
COV
C- LM_ T-
AMOUNT -�
IN- A COD- E -
I IL F T L IEA- DCODE
C' .,d M", Only O'timc<o I CANADIAN AN FUND$ YES
__ - -
CCU
# —
l99% ICZ—
INAL .EUPPL
_ 1311ELIG SAPPR
-L.
-
a
I
y
__.l
I
j
DIST 14 11 ELIG NOT APPR
(CtL%____
N
-I
I- IJ1L L.SUPPL
-
` 1
_
-
-:SUB 9 CIM1OT \PPR
FINAL LI SUPPL
-_
l
E lE
,�g, EJ,
Olc
I v�,�
lRnat
��LE���
COV CIN TFiPN
AMOUNT
CIL AD._UST- R_COD_E_f %PENSE TYPE
N_ FrI �tID 7.cl
-a
>
6
x
1
_E
[ AOJ I APPfl
- -�-
Pink e ax! S,v
C 1
a vee Drift n 6, K, J
✓L
j orJic rv� I one, n nnli-
-
-I --
E,,E °R
L:ADJ !APPR
-
_ _
CRT Opromr Ramnexa
-_-
T TRAM ITJC6E1 AMOUNT r ADJUSTER CODE
a -
IJ) 2995
r
I
•
•
0
STAFF REPORr
DATE: June 18, 1980 t- 4j
L
TO: City Council and City Manager 1977
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Tract No. 9637 Acceptance of Map, Bonds and Agreement
Tract No. 9637 was tentatively approved by the County on
January 20, 1977 for 31 lots on 11.6 acres located at the
N.E. corner of Amethyst and Lemon. The bonds are to guar-
antee the installation of street improvements for the tract
and a future storm drain in Archibald Ave. from Highland to
19th Street to handle future storm runoffs. Bonds are from
Chevron Construction Co., developer, and are as follows:
performance (Surety): $200,000.00
Labor & Material (Surety): $200,000.00
Rk:GVMMENDA'1'1 VN
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution approving the Tract Map and accept the bonds and
agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH: JLM: jaa
Attachments
0
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -55
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING I1dPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9637.
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 9637, consisting of 31
lots, submitted by Crismar Development Suhdivider, located at the north-
east corner of Amethyst and Lemon has been submitted to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided
in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance
with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered
the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution
by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security,
and submits for approval said Final Nap offering for dedication for
public use the streets delineated thereon:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows;
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved
• and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said
City, the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and,
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient,
subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City
Attorney; and,
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating
same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute
the certificate thereon on behalf of said City.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
u
k3
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
I_
I
CI'T'Y ov
RA1 \CI IO
iE
R. Nn. 1631
' � 0
4 0
ITEM:
i
CL'C.ANKYN TA TITER 'T Zc C.T NO. 1631
CXH1131T:-SCAL8: 1"'!500'
C *
V V
N ORTI i
0
11
0
a
r.
TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST
• 340 FOURTH STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92403
(714.) S05-9975
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT
DATE MAY 23, 1990 OUR NO. 71356E
ATTN: MAP,IO MOR1'
CHEVRON CONSTRUCTION CO.
2120 14ILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 200
SANTA MONICA, CA 90403
YOUR NO. SUB GTEE TRACT N0. 9637 (SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT)
IN RESrONSE TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF
TITLE INSURANCE, TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS
THAT IT IS PREPARED TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE
DATE HEREOF, A CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE
DORM POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE DESCRIBING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE
R INTEREST THEREIN HEREINAFTER, SET FORTH, INSURING AGAINST LOSS
NHICH MAY BE SUSTAINED BY REASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUMBERANCE
NOT SHONN OR REFERRED TO AS AN EXCEPTION BELON OR NOT EXCLUDED
FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND
STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORM.
THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS THERETO) IS ISSUED
SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY
OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS
DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY
OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER. OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED.
/� rT DATED AS OF 7:30 A.M. MAY 12, 1980
JAMES 0. BAUGH J
U TITLE OFFICER
0
m
THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OF,' REFERRED
TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT 13 A FEE. •
TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS YESTED IN;
CHEURON CONSTRUCTION CO.: A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BILLING RATE BASIC
0
0
PAGE O2 718562
4
DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY
of F SAN SEP".NAF.DINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS OESCRIBED AS FOLLONS
TRACT 9537, UNRECORDED, BEING A SUBDIUISION OF
THAT PORTION OF LOTS 5, 5 AND 7, TRACT NO. 2051, IN THE COUNTY OF
SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
22 OF MAPS, PAGE 35, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOMS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES
28 MINUTES 00 SECONDS NEST 519.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF
THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE METROPOLITAN 14ATER DISTRICT
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JUNE 30, 1972 IN BOOK 795' PAGE
569 OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE EAST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID METROPOLITAN
NATEP. DISTRICT LAND TO THE HEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE -HALF OF SAID
LOT 7; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 29 PIINUTES 00 SECONDS NEST 523.85 FEET
ON SAID NEST LIVE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE SOUTH S9
DEGREES 41 MINUTES 00 SECONDS NEST 915.57 FEET ON THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID LOTS 5, 5 AND 7 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT ALL OIL, GAS ASPHALTUM AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND
OTHER MINERALS LYING BELON A DEPTH OF 500 FEET, FROM THE SURFACE
OF SAID LAND, BUT 14ITHOUT ANY RIGHT OF ENTRY OR USE OF THE SURFACE
THEREOF AS CONVEYED TO MAR MORY BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 4, !!V?
IN BOOK 9753 PACE 832 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
i 1
LJ
PAGE O3 713552
J7
AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COUERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED
EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY WOULD BE AS FOLLOIS: •
1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 19c0 -19u1
A LIEN NOT YET PAYABLE.
2. NOTE= THE FOLLOWING IS SET FORTH AS ADDITIONAL TAX INFO.RNATION�
GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YE,AP, 1979 -SO,
TOTAL AMOUNT 8602.48: PAID
EXEMPTION NONE
TAX CODE 15001
TAX PARCEL NO. 1062 - 411 -03
AFFECTING PORTION OF SAID LAND
NOTE; THE FOLL014ING IS SET FORTH AS ADDITIONAL TAX INFORMATION:
GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1979 -80,
TOTAL AMOUNT = 86233.98, PAID
EXEMPTION NONE
TAX CODE 15001
TAX PARCEL NO. = 1062- 411 -04
AFFECTING PORTION OF SAID LAND
3. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING ALL OF SAID LAND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED •
HEREIN., AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES.
IN FAVOR OF FOOTHILL IRRIGATION COMPANY
FOR = DISTRIBUTION
RECORDED JANUARY 29, 1926 IN BOOK 59 PAGE 113 OFFICIAL RECORDS
4. AFFECTS SAID LAND WITH OTHER PROPERTY
A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS OF THE AMOUNT STATED HEREIN
GATED , APRIL 29, 1977
AMOUNT $200,000.00
TRUSTOR CHEVRON CONSTRUCTION CO., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TRUSTEE TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
BENEFICIARY HOUSING CAPITAL CORPORATION
RECORDED = MAY 5, 19,77 IN BOOK 9171 PAGE 197 OFFICIAL RECORDS.
TAX BONO NOTE: THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (JILL REOurR,E A BONO
IN THE SUM OF $1,850.00 CASH OR SURETY TO GUARANTEE PAYMENT OF THE
1980 -61 TAX ASSESSMENTS NHICH ARE NON A LIEN BUT !JILL NOT BE PAYABLE
UNITL NOVEMBER 1, 19SO.
TRUST DEED NOTE! UNLESS THE DEED OF TRUST SHOWN AS ITEM NO. 4 I'
RECONVEYED OF RECOF,0, THE COUNTY OF SHN BERNAROINO HILL EECLU.F THAT
THE TRUSTEE JOIN IN THE E ;;ECU110H CF THE OWNER'S CERTIFICm TE ON TriE
MAP OF PROPOSED TFHCT NO. 9037, TF.UST --- HILL F,'E01fIRE NRITTEN Al7.i'i'F'._ATION
FROM THE 6EHEFICI4RY FOR SIGNING SAID I•!AP. .
PAGE 04 718552
■
DATE:
TO%
FROM:
SUBJECT:
go
CITY 5FAFF REPORT X`
June 18, 1980
city Council and City ttanager
Liubbs, City Engineer
Lloyd 5- Parcel Map No. 5792 Acceptance of Map,
Bonds and
Agreement
by Lewis Properties 1980
the it En9 ineer on May 12,
No. 5192 was side of Archibato
Parcel Map a proved by ed on the west
tentatively P16 Line, The bonds treet
is on acres locat of Base oul -de -sac
for 3 to telY 470 feet north a Future n of
approxima the consstr are
as follows:
be used m °ta Court and
named Lo $46,000.00
Performance (Surety): $4b 000.00
Labor & Material (Surety)
City Council adopt the attached
RECOMME N accepting the bonds and
that and
It is recommended Court.
resolution approving Lomita
agreement to install
Respectfullyy submitted,
V
LBP : JLi4: j as
Attachments
•
BOND NO. 100271
PREMIUM: $782.00
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and Lewis Properties, Inc.,
(hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated May 28 19 80 , and identified as
project Pa c I M p N 5792
is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and,
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE
COMPANY , as surety, are held and
firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called
"City "), in the penal sum of forty -six thousand
Dollars ( ) lawful
money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execu-
tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide
by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, condi-
tions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration
thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be
kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein spec-
ified, and in all respects according to their true intent and
meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers,
agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation
shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in
full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment
rendored.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the
agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spec-
--._._...------.._
CALIF.
ORANCE
;NERrAL
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY
LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA
KNOW %iA. Mfi%III Ill 13E PRCSC VIS: I hat DEVELOPERS INSUR A NCE CONIP ANY, a eorpormmn, duN organlnJ a M eastmg under the
lax, of the State of Cahl nnua. died haling d 11 + ILeu In r t Let, AI (n 1 lit died and appointed and does b) there
pre,erl, mare. enn,Iltllle end npprnnt IIL W H. D �1�'�E'i and �'St E�t �.a, Ssa��J
jointly or severally
as uoeand ex:ul ri,r e4,end -1 am with fall 1111 and :udbor,hereby umfcrred In n, come, placesandgoad.toesecme.seal, icknouledgeanddehnerany
and ad hear,. rmdcrthko ,reengnl,di,c, or other written obligation, In the nature thereof
and in hind 0,e Cnrperallon thereh, a+full) and m IFe>a me eamm u, tf well bond, were oyned b, the I're,Ncnl.,cal,d w uh the corporate seal of the Corporation
and Jill ,ntesed M It, S,,r,tnn, herchl raliking and containing all that the said ,Vlnrne,l,pnt -Fact mesa do In the pmmucs,
Thin nowef of utorno .granted pursuant to A ,odic IV. Seaton I I and Idof R,- law,of DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY ad.pledou the 30th
des, of %mach. t979. and now In full force and at,,,.
Amide H. Appaamnrnt and .,mnmy m header, nowunt Sc,reunv,. 110 Anemn,n. fait -J apem, to 11,111 1.,1 reKen ere Nee A,,eirer,t,
smwn ll TheCmrnnin of me nand,m,PeudmLan, Vie, Perdido, erne vccraen —n, Ire...—maa app ,nm.unmen.m.11a i—Ventaxrm ro.erand awnr,nu.
» Wired or dT1,r,d m II'.e sepses' spare n,a a. Ina aid in Rb'o nl ins ... .... and d.'I and alit the teal we the corporation abo,d,
a. nderlaLnp,r , el arch or ithcl written obl,loem in the her le hemnl atnd an, nl uul nll¢ntm.0 remits wan vinrnmnmle, ul.,er and mein,
1. Pnxer and aalnor It f 11h 1,1 ebid'
,he,nl: etth bond, nndornlmv. urgnv r ofmren nr wrmenenh atom i mnenaturelh—ofoau be old,rd hlndmgopnnlhccnrpnr whenugned h,
bl I ill hills L tnelr-ohr , %lie N —Jrn ,Ire rld.lul, mdand—ItJ 11.1 reyur¢d.1w ant>ea eu-uPncdbihc(d
od ,aIl.lrr,lllhe Pe,idbr,anal loo 1'reuJCntr,, ant IIcaturt tied ...nt,lu,red and .l.. led, Ja —I orcVii-d ,hl a dull alai toes led rmliene,.in -fanny Iluo-1 tuah
nnnJ,m'derlilane,rni.gnaunce. enn.emnf Ire, nr xnucn nhlagallarnm be mtweIM1Onnhnall tie vLJ and nmdmgvpin theverpoullnn ahcnduh c,ecmNaMu,f,J.da
leaf n 111arlJ. nl e e t nmre e11n liar. u, al:enla punwnt Ia and within the iamb, o the aothontl pranged to nn or Theo In%— of anotno
Thi, onser of adorns, I upold and waled undee and by the athorn, of the following Reseluuon adopted b, the heard of Olreeton of DEN ELOPERS
INSI RANGE CON PAN Y' at a meeting dull e:Jled and held on the lath du) of fan tar , 1980. and that sand Resolution has not been amended an repeated'
-R ESOL \'ED, that the ughature of — Vice- Pmddanl, A,ar,lant Seneter, , and Resident Aantani Smrefaty of this Corporation, and the icil of thin
Corporation ma, he hhincd or printed on and power of a tome, on an) maoubon of an, power of alornry, ar eeriiLeate hearing such facamde signature or
facvmdc seal shall he,ahJ and binding upon the Corpor:dmn
IN get r%FSSxHI:R Fol.DEVE,LOPERSINSI RAN( 'E COMPANY hasaauad these p ,,,,nts tobeslgned byiu Scercla ,and uscorporateseal to be
hereunto Aftned thin Iatb des) of January, 1980.
DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Paul L Griffin, Jr., Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss.
On the lam d.n of J.r near,. 19811. halm, m, p,T,oh.tf, cline Paul L Gnfbn. J,. to n, hnnwn, who hems hl me dial, ,worn. did defense and .a) that he Is
Seereelrl if DEN I. IDI't'. RS INS( 'RAN( 'E( OMPAN) ' the( 'erpnratmn damohN or and ef- h,u,cwrd thcuhu,amlrulneht, than he truss, 'he .calof
said ('nrpmatinn. I h.r the,e.d o11.,ed In I M1i ant unli he...nehIorpnrare mdl,that if was 1 a11111d h, Dada of the Roarit of Ilrl,elnr, of,od Cnr,udldin
and that he soared hn name thereto Mire order
-- ��aOFPICI �SCa1L
IL
y
My Comm erpm5 SrP e, 1981
it
s
19136 Venrare Shot erord, Terraria, G 91350
/ \Ian Hine n. \man Pahl.,
Cl Rill If 811
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss.
3 G
7
•
•
l I
BOND NO. 1002717,
PREMIUM: INCLUDED
LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and Lewis Properties
(hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated May 28 , 1980, _ and identified as pro-
ject Parcel Map No. 5792
is hereby referred to and - -made a part hereof; and,
WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re-
quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file
a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15
(commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the
Civil Code of the State of California.
• NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material -
men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid
agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure
in the sum of forty-six thousand
Dollars ( 46,000.00 ), for materials
furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under
the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor,
that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the
amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought
upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof,
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed
as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and
corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing
with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so
as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit
brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then
this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall 6o
and remain in full force and effect.
1 CALIF.
"A ORANGE
.,d(
June 3, 1980
Mr. John Martin
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. O. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Lewis Properties, Inc.
Parcel Map No. 5792
Dear Sir:
DEVELOPERS
INSURANCE COMPANY
5152 Katella Ave.
Los Alamitos, California 90720
(213) 5944 659
(714) 5278262
At the request of Lewis Properties Inc., we enclose Improve-
ment Agreement and completed Subdivision Bonds relating to
the above project which we trust you will find in order.
Sincerely,
Albert H. Brunet
Vice President
cc: James R. Lewis
Lewis Properties, Inc.
Encl.
AHB /cmp
Cgl YCo i OtiITY DEVL: VMENT DEPT.
-, I1, 41980
AM PM
7 I 1911011111,1112,31411 6
3 ( j
Ll
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
• FOR
PARCEL MAP N0, 5792
Y.NO41 ALL MEN 8Y THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered
into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and
Lewis Properties , Inc.
hereinafter referred to as the Developer.
WITNESSETH:
THAT, 1.1HEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the
City of Parcel Flap Number 5792 in accordance with the
provisions of the report of the City Engineer thereon, and any amendments
thereto; located on the west side of Archibald, north of Base Line.
and,
VIHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said Dev-
eloper prior to granting the final approval of the parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security
• as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be
equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the pupose of securing
said approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer
as follows:
I1
1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all
improvements described on Page 3 hereof within nine months from the
2
date hereof, as per Section .12 of Ordinance No. 28.
The term of this agreement shall be nine months commencing on the date
of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on
the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said term
has been extended as hereinafter provided.
3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the pro-
visions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to
the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity
for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves
the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards,
cost estimate_, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require
adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein.
4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this
agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions
to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said
Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. •
S. Encroachment permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of
the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right of way,
and the Developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the re-
gulations contained therein. Non- compliance may result in stopping of the
work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided.
6. Public right of way improvement work required shall be constructed in con-
formance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and
Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall
include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for
drainage or public safety.
RCE12A
•
•
9
IMOVEMENT AGREEMENT
Page 2
7. .clerk done within existing strce Le shall he diligently pursued to comple-
L iun; the City shell have the ri Cht Ln complete In, and all work in the
cecnt of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and
expense incurred from the Developer and /or his Contractor by any lawful
means.
S. The Developer ::hall be responsihlo for replocemcnt, relocation, or re-
moval of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with
the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner
of the water system.
9. The Prveloper shall he responsible for runa.val of all loose rock and other
dcbr is from the public right of way resulting from work done on the adja-
cent property or within said right of way.
10. 'IIn: Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the
Community Development Director.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee
completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval
of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement security
shall be not less than the amount shown below:
• IMPROVElIENT SECURITY SUBMITTED: Faithful Performance Bond $46,000
TYPE SURETY /AGENT PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
Material and Labor Bond $46,000.00
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly
exrcutcd and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates
set forth opposite their signatures:
LEWIS PROPMTIES, INC„ ,, DEVELOPER
BY :
DATE:May 28, 1980
%9 r DATE:May 28, 1980
soli'- ewi s, e rr2 ct y"
W11 'NESS: DATE:May 28, 1980
�e T PV
CT P OF RANCHO CUCNION(1A, CALIFORNIA
• a municipal corporation
BY _ , MAYOR
ATTEST: Q CITY CLERK
DATE:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •�. ,•.. '. - 3
CONSTRUCTION AND BOND ESTIMATE
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
(Attach to "Inspector's Copy ")
DATE: 5/27/80 PERMIT NO. Parcel Map 5792 COMPUTED DY Barbara •
File Reference City Drawing No
NO'VL: Does not include current fee for writing permit or pavement replace-
ment deposits.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT
UNIT COST
AMOUNT
CRADE RNINT nF l,AY
S.F.
R
KIHI :O %ALA, MISC.
L.S.
A. C. PA�E?!ES'I
17,640
S.F.
2.646.00
A. C. SERM
11. F.
CURB & CFT'P ".;
1 016
T..F.
CROSS CTl'i F.R /SI',V:O ^.EL
S.F.
SIDL6ALR
4.064
S.F.
7
DRIVE APPRO.WHES - residential
S.F.
Cai'SHED AGCSECA'PE BASE
S.F.
S'I'R F.ET STC'ITS
2
Fn
2" X 4" RED',00D HEADER
I
T•. F.
STREET 8Ti1N5
2
EA.
4
R.C.P.
,.F.
CA'TCii BASIN
EA.
nIITLET STRUCTURE
EA.
STREET EXCAVATION
3,528
PREPARATION OF SI'BrRADF
17,64()
REMOVAL OF P.C.C. CURB
110
1
1
1
r
RRT,u:,r.r uAl.r•s r
r.
HLOCi;AAi•r•.S 1
L.F.
LANDSCAPE .4 TRR[GA'f ION !
L.S.
lJ
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 37,941.00 •
0
INSPECTION FEES
ITEM
QUANT17Y
IINI T-1
M- T COST
9 AI 0 CN
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION) -
of Construction Cost Estimate
L.S.
T. S.
L.S.
111\1'P'41 N I' Ci T OR TREK .
F
PKR:iA: ;ZN1' PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT
L. 1".
STORE IIAIERTAI, 1:1 RTBTIT -OP -NAY
F.A.
I. TOTAL INSPECTION FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 1,832.35
II. CWTACTION TEST FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$
•
111. 10'.. CCNTINGCVCIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 3,794.10
IV. DESIGN FEES (10% of Total Construction Cost Estimate) . $ 1.974.10
TOTAL $ 4S. S�9. 70
Faithful Performance Bond = $ 46,000.00
Material and Labor Bond = $ 46,000.00
Maintenance Bond = $
Cash Monumenting Deposit - $
RCC'_2E
l L
. A,6 /18
• RESOLUTION NO. 80 -56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5792,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.5792)
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, tentative Parcel Map No. 5792 submitted by Lewis
Properties, and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the west side of
Archibald north of Baseline, being a division of Parcel Map No. 4286
was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on
May 12, 1980; and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 5792 is the final map of the division
of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements estabii -!:.,� as prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable
improvement security by Lewis Properties as developer;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and
• said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same
are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map Number 5792 be and the
same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present
same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
[T
M(Ur /VE
0 PARCa MAP NO. 5792
MAE-
= S f
li i S1�
'3
e.sA.eta.�a.�s I a..u.ri ®.cgs 3',
I
� l
0
0
n
U
CITY OF RANCHO CUG %NKVC A oCt"
STAFF REPORT
i;
F
1977
DATE: June 18, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
U
SUBJECT: Consent Calendar - Release of Bonds
Tract 9083: Located north of Arrow Route and east of Hellman Avenue
OWNER: John C. Heers, Inc.
1450 E. Cooley Drive
Colton, California 92324
Cash Staking Bond $2,500
The County of San Bernardino has received final monumentation
for Tract 9083 and has requested the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga to authorize release of the cash staking
• bond.
Tract 9083 -1: Located north of Arrow Route and east of Hellman Avenue
OWNER: John C. Heers, Inc.
1450 E. Cooley Drive
Colton, California 92324
Cash Staking Bond $3,400
The County of San Bernardino has received final monumentation
for Tract 9083 -1 and has requested the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to authorize release of the cash
staking bond.
Tract 9083 -4: Located north of Arrow Route and east of Hellman Avenue
OWNER: John C. Heers, Inc.
1450 E. Cooley Drive
Colton, California 92324
Cash Staking Bond $2,950
The County of San Bernardino has received final monumentation
for Tract 9083 -4 and has requested the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to authorize release of the cash
staking bond.
S ,_
Memo re Release of bonds
6/18/80
Page 2
Tract 9083 -5: Located north of Arrow Route and east of Hellman Avenue .
OWNER: John C. Heers, Inc.
1450 E. Cooley Drive
Colton, California 92324
Cash Staking Bond $4,100
The County of San Bernardino has received final monumentation
for Tract 9083 -5 and has requested the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to authorize the release of the
cash staking bond.
Tract 9225: Located north of Highland Avenue and west of Carnelian Street
OWNER: Thomas W. Kendall
141 Emerald Bay
Laguna Beach, California 92651
Cash Staking Bond $3,650
The County of San Bernardino has received final monumentation
for Tract 9225 and has requested the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga to authorize release of the cash staking
bond.
Tract 9446: Located on the west side of Baker between 8th and 9th Streets •
OWNER: Kingsway Construction Company
110 West "A" Street, Suite 590
San Diego, California 92101
Performance Bond (Block Wall) $7,700
The block wall has been constructed and approved.
Tract 9454: Located on the west side of Haven Avenue north of the Southern
Pacific Railroad
OWNER: Lewis Homes of California
P.O. Box 670
Upland, California 91786
Performance Bond (Road) $148,000
Performance Bond (Water) 34,800
Performance Bond (Sewer) 40,800
The Cucamonga County Water District approved the installation
of the sanitary sewer and water systems on December 31, 1979.
The road construction has been approved as being in accordance
with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the •
City Council accept the roads.
q3
Memo Re Release of bands
6,18/80
Page 3
. Tract 9582 -2 Located on the north side of Wilson Avenue at Beechwood Drive
•
t�
OWNER: The Deer Creek Company
P. 0. Box 488
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
Perfromance Bond (Road) $138,000
The road construction has been approved as being in accordance
with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the
City Council accept the roads.
Parcel Map 4594: Located at the northeast corner of Jersey Boulevard and
Haven Avenue
OWNER: C 8 L Homes
521 North Mountain Avenue
Upland, California 91786
Performance Bond (Road) $131,500
The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the road improvement plans and it is
recommended that the City Council accept the roads.
l�—
ORDINANCE No 109
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
• GARRETT AND COMPANY WINERY AS A SIGNIFICANT
HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE
DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that the
following features of the Garrett and Company Winery (Virginia Dare t.m.)
have met the criteria established by Ordinance No. 70 for Historic Preservation
within the City, and therefore, and with the recommendation of the Historic
Preservation Commission designates these features of the Garret and Company
Winery (Virginia Dare t.m.) a Historic landmark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. The main winery building of approximately
31,500 sq. ft. fronting on Foothill Blvd.
and Haven Avenue.
2. The two auxiliary buildings of approximately
3,780 and 3,312 sq. ft, located directly behind and
• to the north of the main building.
3. The crusher area of approximately 480 sq. ft.
located in an area north of the main building.
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to
be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in
The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City
of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
U
PASSED APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
/1� Mayor
•
ORDINANCE NO. 105 -A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 105.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain
as follows:
Section 1. Section 3 -F of Ordinance No. 105 is hereby amended as
follows:
"Park and Recreational Land Credit for Planned Communities. Where
private open space for park and recreational purposes is provided in a
planned community and portions of or all such space is to be privately owned
and maintained by the future residents of the planned community or publicly
dedicated d maintained by a special assessment district, credit against the
requirement of dedication for park and recreational purposes, as set forth
in Section 2 -G shall be determined through the adoption of the planned
community text provided, however, that the park standard for said olanned
• community is the same as for any other development and that the Planning
Commission finds it is in the public interest to do so, and that the following
standards are met:"
Section 2. All other portions of Ordinance 105 should remain in full
force and effect.
Section 3. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall
attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published
within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report,
a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, and cir-
culated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this __day of 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 4 Y
9
ORDINANCE NO. 39 -B
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE N0, 39, PERTAINING
TO THE SPEED LIMIT ON SAPPHIRE STREET.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain
as follows:
SECTION l: That Section 5.0 of Ordinance No. 39 is amended
as follows:
Section 5.0. Increasing State Speed limit in Certain Zones
It is hereby determined by City Council Resolution and upon
the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed
permitted by state law upon the following streets is less than is
necessary for safe operation of vehicles thereon by reason of the
designation and signposting of said streets as through highways and (or)
by reason of widely spaced intersections, and it is hereby declared that
the prima facie speed limit shall be as hereinafter set forth on those
streets or parts of streets herein designated when signs are erected
giving notice thereof:
Name of Street of
Portion Affected:
Declared Prima Facie
Speed Limit:
1.
Amethyst Street - Baseline north to end of maintenance
35
mph
2.
Beryl Street - Baseline to 800' north of Lemon Avenue
40
mph
3.
Hellman Avenue - Foothill Boulevard to Banyan Street
35
mph
4.
Ninth Street - Grove Avenue to Baker Street
35
mph
S.
Sapphire Street - 19th Street to Banyan Street
40
mph
6.
Sapphire Street - Banyan Street to end of maintenance
45
mph
7.
Vineyard Avenue - Carnelian Avenue to Baseline
40
mph
8.
Wittram Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to City limit
40
mph
9,
Haven Avenue - Highland Avenue to Wilson Avenue
45
mph
10.
Grove Avenue - Eighth Street to Foothill Boulevard
40
mph
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and
the
City
Clerk shat l'cuse the same to be published within fifteen (15)
days
after
its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper
of
general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California,
and
circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980.
ATTEST:
tauren-rt.-#n,ermart,-t-Tty- Oerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
47
0
Ll
10
CITY OF RAN 10 CUUAN"A'A
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 18, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Revision to Ordinance 28 and 58
At its May 7, 1980 meeting, the City Council reviewed requests
for the postponement of street improvements on a proposed
building and subdivision in the Etiwanda area. In both of
these cases and in previous instances, there have occurred
problems which preclude the construction of improvements at
the current time. Under current ordinances there are no
provisions for the postponement of improvements. This has
resulted in hardship to property owners.
The Staff feels that current Ordinances are overly restric-
tive and should be revised to allow the postponement of
improvements where the City Engineer makes a finding that
current construction is infeasible. In these cases, the
property owner will be required to enter into a lien agree-
ment guaranteeing construction when required by the City
Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Council approve Ordinances 28.A
and 58. B.
Respectfully) submitted,
LBH: jaa
Attachments
W
.. . is -A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUB - SECTION (f) OF SECTION
2.12 OF ORDINANCE NO. 28 TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EX-
CEPTIONS TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL OFF -SITE
• IMPROVEMENTS BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN A PERIOD OF
NINE (9) MONTHS FOLLOWING THE RECORDATION OF A
PARCEL MAP FOR EACH LOT UPON WHICH THERE EXISTS
A BUILDING OR OTHER USABLE STRUCTURE AT THE TIME
OF SUCH RECORDATION.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: sub- section (f) of section 2.12 of Ordinance
No. 28 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"The City Council hereby finds
that it is necessary for reasons of
public health and safety that all off -
site improvements be constructed with-
in a period of nine (9) months follow-
ing the recordation of a parcel map
for each lot on which there exists a
building or other usable structure at
the time of such recordation. The
foregoing provisions not withstanding,
the City Engineer may postpone the con-
struction of off -site improvements to
such later time as he shall, in his
discretion, determine if he finds that
at the time of recordation either (1)
physical conditions peculiar to the
parcel to be improved weu4A- su"tan- '
tially- incxEase_.�he. -cost nf.making
said improvements, or (2) no off -site
improvements exist contiguous to the
improved parcel being created and no
buildable lot will be created by the
subdivision.
"No postponement of construction
shall be granted by the City Engineer
unless the owner of the subject parcel
shall agree in writing to construct re-
quired off -site improvements at such
future time as shall then or thereafter
be determined by the City Engineer which
said contract shall create a lien upon
the property to be divided as security
for the performance of said agreement.
Any such written contract and lien agree-
ment shall be recorded with the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County immed-
iately subsequent to the recordation of
the subject parcel map. ".
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general
circulat', , published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucanonga, California.
1980.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST: •
City Clerk
"D
•
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 58 TO PER-
MIT THE USE OF LIEN AGREEMENTS AS SECURITY FOR
THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 6 of Ordinance No. 58 is hereby amended
to read as follows:
"Section 6. Construction of Public Improvements -
Prerequisite to Approval of the Build -
Ing Official.
"(a) Except as provided in Section 5, the
Building Official shall deny issuance of a building
permit, or deny approval for occupancy or deny final
approval and acceptance for public utility connec-
tions to any building or parking lot until required
full frontage improvements exist, or are constructed
or their Construction is guaranteed by an executed
agreement and cash money deposited with the City in
a sum approved by the City Engineer based upon one -
and- one -half (1 -1/2) times the estimated cost of
construction.
"(b) In the event construction of full front-
age improvements is not required to be completed
within six (6) months after the issuance of the build-
ing permit, the City Engineer may, at his option, re-
quire that a lien upon the property to be improved
be created by contract between the owner and the City
as : -irity for the performance by the owner of the
cons�Luction guarantee agreement instead of a cash
deposit. In the event a lien agreement is required
pursuant to this section, no building permit shall
issue until it is recorded in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County. ".
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general
circulation, published in Uie City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of
1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST: rl
•
I
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 1900
TO; City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Industrial Area Storm Drain Policy
At the June 4, 1980 Council meeting, the Staff reviewed
several issues related to drainage policies within the
Industrial Area. Key issues were the raising of storm
drain fees from $2,500 per acre to $4,600 per acre and
the establishment of a special impact zone. The item was
continued to the June 18 meeting to allow review of these
issues with the City Attorney. The Staff has been working
on the problem and have revealed numerous complexities
and legal ramifications to all the options.
RECOMMENDATION:
In order to fully develop the policy options, the Staff would
recommend a further continuance to the first meeting in July.
This additional time will also allow full coordination of
policy options with the Industrial Community.
Respectfully submitted,
LSH: jaa
6�
0
•
E
CITY Of RANCM CUC,ANKMA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager//
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer,�'/l,
BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance i(Supervisor
SUBJECT: Street Sweeper Acquisition
Per prior Council approval, bids were solicited and received
on May 28, 1980, for one vacuum type street sweeper. Two
valid bids were received and are shown on the attached bid
summary. The machine will be received 90 days from issuance of
the purchase order. Because of the long delivery time, it is
important that this order be issued as soon as possible.
Both companies offer a preventive maintenance program for their
machines, and due to the City's lack of a mechanic this factor
should weigh heavy on the final decision. Haaker offers a
program for $50 per month with travel time of 224 a mile each
way, Crook, $200 per month with 500 per mile for travel. Based
on the above, Haaker offers the better program being located
in Pomona vs. Crook Company located in Norwalk.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council autho-
rize the Finance Director to purchase one Ecolotec Vacu -Sweep
as supplied by Haaker Equipment Co., Pomona, as per City
specification, for the bid price of $71,990.96.
S&
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUIMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED
PROJECT VACUUM STREET SWEEPER
LOCATION
SATE_
5 -28 -80
2:00 p.QONTRACT
ITE`IS
QUANTITIES
CYook Co.
Haaker Equip.
Bid
Amount
Bid
Amount
Bid
Amount
Bid
Amount
B
Bidder's Bond
Base Price
Wander Hose
1
1
Ea.
Ea
7 0, 27 1. OC
2,225.0
71,990.96
Inc.
72,996.0
71,990.96
y Drp.ntment IONrHACLNUMHEH
r r
sv 6tyanmens Fleo..... ue `
S , COUNTY OF SAN SERNAROINO Frank Bland, Sheriff 2511 IY,XHe're..abla ;]te:mmnles
_
STANDARD CONTRACT Ie n
nattContiuinn
��ngm unn No. d, ul�l „f rvo. F�.�•.e No aoh mo. I Ati n nt Gomran
4U1 1 9646 _J 001 52,14R,64E. D
ehrr'n One tj enl \—= 9y194n• -1 Hev Ir contract nas mare tnrn nns
SSA = au:nnleu: the lnllownm,. "aYmen<or rectum,
:. Fcneral n m er Schedule A
Empmver 1O_ FSUmayp amoum of eaen. seer SChediulE
n
THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and b =_hveen the County of San Bernardino, hereafter
ca;led the County, and
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
hereafter called CITY
IT IS HERESY AGREED AS FOLLOWS;
lVSrl .yrare lielo:v and rewire +ide o! /0111 if needed. Set lordr scryme ro Ae ra ... to d, urnouot to he padl, manner at payment,
tnac tv, performance or corrlpfetioo, Aetennir.,:tion of .vtixlar. Cory perlormance a,,d sauna for mrminanon, other terms and
101011:X`:, and elraclr pla,m, soeciliratio115, and addonda, i/ anY.l
WHEREAS, City and County desire to provide by
contract for performance of law enforcement services within
• the territorial boundaries of City,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
I.
County shall provide, through the Sheriff of San
Bernardino County (hereinafter referred to as "Sheriff "),
law enforcement within the corporate limits of City as same
now exist, or as such limits may be modified by annexation
or exclusion during the term of this agreement.
I1.
The law enforcement services to be provided by
County and furnished to City hereunder shell include:
9
rnny proelyiov nn ;h^ roverse S:le and n: h�rnuwll Itach n:, aS !u° a >1 cruttrute a part (if this contract and are
,nenrporaiarl herein ,, full.
0212111 101 lleny {o,,, Z eagc I 0
I
I� A. Enforcement of state statutes;
2
�ij G. Enforcement of ordinances of City;
3
C. Police protection of the type customarily ;rovided
1
a
"'lby Sheriff within the unincorporated territory of the County;
S
j) D. Traffic enforcement, with the exception of such
6
;litraffic enforcement as may be provided by the California Highway
'Patrol on the freeway traversing Citv;
s
E. All detective, juvenile and other specialized
y
�services provided by Sheriff in the unincorporated area of County
10
such as arson, homicide and narcotics enforcement.
F. Attendance at meetings of the City Council of City
12
a .1 such other meetings of corrnissions or boards of City as City
13
dmay specify;
'
14
P. Jail facilities and services extent for violations
15
�lof City ordinances which will be billed to the City;
i
1ri
II. The helicopter %ill patrol and respond to cal k
,
17
I
,.for service and maintain a t>:renty -four hour standby service for
I
IK
IIcalis which occur during unschedulcd flin,ht shifts;
19
i All other law enforcement services of the type custoriarily
20
!iprovided by Sheriff ..ii thin the unincorporated area of the County.
21
Tha services to he provided by County hereunder shall also
i
22
include all enuini ,ient (includfi.g repairs thereto or depreciation
i
I
21
it'ne neon), Supplies, cOCS�imications, services, ad nti pis tra tion,
i
2.1
labor, insurance, liabilities, los ;es, vacation and sick leave,
I
25
H�any County retir ere nt contributions, and traveling exnonsP. s and
26
lull other services, 0 b1fgati0 11 s, n exnenditores necessary 0r
i
27
�,I in c den t sl to the perf•orr,ance of the duties to be Pe rfori,:ed by
2b
h�> is agr e een t. 7!otrivi th, tand i Mg the
'I� >•ifC iin r dr the terms of th rr
16 Page 2 of 8
•
9
ii
I j'f oregoing, in all instances where special supplies, stationery,
2 �IInotices, forms and the like are to be issued in the narae of City
3 eland approved by the Sheriff, the same shall be supplied by City
I
a :hat its own cost and expense.
5 �! City shall provide office space, furniture, equipment,
f it rn i s'ain,s, station maintenance, tel ephrenes, CPT, teletype
7 s ervice, other c— , :rruni cat ions and utilities determined necessary
g ',Iby the S'r�eriff.
9 'I IV.
Ip•i In consideration for County's furnishing and performance
II I Of all the services provided for Here, City shill nay to County,
12 Ilupon contract approval, the sum as per Schedule " ^ ", attached
13 llper year, payable in twelve equal monthly installments at the
I4 baginning of each calendar month during the period of this
15 I,I agreement_.
16 First pnvraent shill be. due on July la, the remaining
17 lii el even payments shall be due prior to the fifth day of each
month. Said sum is subject to adjustment for any salary increases
19 Il or fringe benefits which may be granted by the Coa rd of
20 ,I Supervisors to Sheriff's employees. The actual cost of overtime.,
21 ji court appearances and travel expenses incurred between duly I
ey ���and dune 30 mill be billed quarterly.
23 ;j County slialI have the right to renenotia to the rate for
24 no in ten anon punrt.eriy and for services performed under Chi S
25 �I a y r err rap tit at the end of each fiscal year for the ensuing fiscal
I
Zg year, and said rate may he adjusted uo.ia rd or do wilwa rd to reflect
27 the r. c tunl cost.
28 �I ci,cnty shall, it cnriside rat ior) for tile payment of the suns
S71 Page 3 of 8
i
I
t (herein above provided to be paid to City, hold City harmless
2 I��from any and all such other costs, expenditures, charges or
3 ;liabilities except heretofore described. City shall not be
I
4 '(!l !able for compensation or indemnity to any County employee for
5 injury or sickness arising out of his employment while engaged
6 yin the performance of this agreenent by County.
7 City shall hold County harmless for a reduction, in law
8 �lenfer.ement services resulting in labor- relation actions and
4 City will be reimbursed for such a reduction in services not
10 p r'fc rmcd.
v.
u
12 li The tern of this contract shall be a period of time
13 commencing at July I and terminating only as hereafter provided
w Thi; agreement may be terminated at any time with or without
15 '!�cauze by City or by County upon written notice given to the
16 I1 other at least ninety days before the date specified for such
17 termination.
18 !� Any such termination date shall coincide with the end of a
19 11calendar month. In the event of such termination each party
20 (Ishall fully nay and discharge all obligations in favor of the
21 ';!,other accruing prior to the date of such termination and each
22 !Harty shall be relased from all obligations of which would
23 i Otherwise accr�ie sulbse'luen`. to the date of such tor;lination.
I�
24 �� Any and •rll notices renuirod to be given hereunder shall
25,1 hn. given in .; ri ting by registered or certified mail. The
i
26 addresses of the parties hereto until further notice are as
27 ';i fO 11 olds:
28 II
� //
S r Page 4 of E
i
•
•
9
CITY: Phillip C. Schlosser, Nayor
i
2 Post Office 'Box 307
I
3 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
a !I COUNTY: Board of Supervisors
I
5 !i County Civic Building - ',lest
6 175 Slest 5th Street
7 San Bernardino, California 92.01
I
R 'i The standards of performance, the methods of performance,
i
9'�t he discipline of officers, the control of personnel, the
10 in compensation of personnel, the determination of
II proper Tare enforcement practices and procedures and all other
12 j� matters incidental to the manner o` performance of services by
13 Sheriff hereunder sha11 be determined by Sheriff in his sole
14 :discretion. The resnons i bi I ty of Sheriff and of County to City
15 (hereunder shall be to provide, as an independent con tracti nag,
16 agency, affective law an orcenlent of the level r: contracted
17 for and the City shall not have the right to deterrli ne or diract
1X Ithe manner or means of Performance.
19 it VII.
I
20 All persons directly or indirectly employed by County in
21 the performance of the services and functions to be provided
22 to City hereunder, shall be employees of County, and no County
I
2.1 I�e.mployee shall have City pension, civil service or other status
24 or right. Aotvriths tanding t'ne forr,going, and in order to give
i
25 ('official status to the performance of duties by Sheriff's
26 personnel hereunder, every Sheriff's officer cr employee engaged
III
27 .tin performing any such service or, function shall be deemed to be
28 ai, officer of City while performing service for City within the
/F Pape 5 of 8
I
I �scone of this agreement, and such service or function shall be
2 Ira nun i c i pal function.
i
3 An arrest made by Sheri IF s nerse,nnel whi l e engaged in
4 II the performance of this agreement shall constitute an arrest
5 l'by an officer employed by City, and not an arrest by County
6 '!loffi car, within the meaning of Section 1463 of the Penal Code
7 P :.-nd any similar or related statute.
a VIII.
i
l it City shall have the right at any time and fro:: time to
Io !It ilne during the term of this agreement to request a higher
i '!level of lacy enforcement than that herein contracted for, and
12 within a reasonable time after such requests, County shall
13 Ilprovide such additional personnel and vehicles as may be required
I
14 '!1to provide such additional lar: enforcement.
15 jj in such event, all provisions of this agreement with
16 c,)ect to compensation to he paid by City shall remain in full
17 !,force and effect, btrt in addition to payment of the su:rs
18 therein provided, City shall oay County in monthly installments
1Il lthe cost of such additional La o-: en f r P.m ant service.
I
20
I!
21 In thn event of riot, civil commotion, or other emgergercv.
'
22 in tine City rlhich renuires additional emergency or "Lack -up"
23 I!!,ervice, Count,, shall provide the sane -,and City will pay County
24 for ac. r.uaI oser• time an:l related en,u ip:nent I :ost9 as determined by
i
25 the 5heriff.
26 llot included in riots or related services are salaries or
27 I,Irel., I costs of add tionnl Irnl ice services for authorized
28 !'11 ou I i c g tii P. r r qs. In the event of suc'u in eraergenuy outside
60 Page 6 of
0
9
ii
jl
I j�of the corporate limits of City, personnel or equipment assigned
2 I1by Sheriff to the performance of County's duties hereunder, may
3 Ibe utilized by County in connection vi th such emergency, dithout
a any diminution or adjustment in the suns to be paid 'hereunder
I
5 by City.
fi X.
7 TO facilitate the performance of service=_ hereunder by
g )++IICount?, City, its officers, agents, and employees shall give
q �'I their full cooperation and assistance w thin the scone of t!�e
to iiduties and responsibilities of such officers, agents and
11 '�em ^.l ogees.
12 �,� City shall 'mold County, its Sheriff, officers and
13 !,jemployees harnless from any and all liability for intentional
14 facts of negligence on the Part of City, its officers and
is ',ien ?lcyees (axcludinq any employees of County engaged in the
II15 i�perfcrnance of municipal duties hereunder) arising out of the
17 �I performance of this co,�tract.
IN I /II /1 /ll1/
19
i
21
22
23
24
25
26
try
61 Page 7 of S
Xi.
Sheriff shall be designated as the Chief of Police of
City at all times during the term of this agreement.
Said Sheriff shall appoint a deputy or officer assigned
to work directly with and provide liaison with the City
Nanager and other City officers of the City. The Sheriff's
Deputy shall make regular monthly reports to the City Manager,
and such other reports as may be appropriate as determined by
the Sheriff, with respect to law enforcement within the
corporate limits of City.
COUNiY OF ,A;•i BERNARDINO
- --- CITY_, RANCHO CUCMON,A
Chmrnen, tlu.rrd of Supervisors - -_ -- rI r-- .f ror -- , - -_
I room, , •nparry, mfr. 1
Dalod
l +. fTESTEC. lauth,,.ual S,grnl�re -1 ____
Doted
County CUU nM`I
CJ
n
U
Titly _ tdAYOP._ -._ _ _ _
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Addrrss _�.`C.v._O.v
CA 91730
R.., igamrl r, pt ni,rl9rl •�pnn.LL rtr.
.._� fuunry rlAinn nstr dtue IPfI _
8
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CONTRACT BUDGET
FY 80/81
47_a R1ES AND EXPENSES:
Manpower:
1 Captain $
41,201.00
1 Lieutenant
37,654.00
6 Sergeants
190,623,00
5 Detectives
140,089.00
35 Deputies
970,180.00
1/3 Limited Duty Deputy
7,537.00
3 Dispatchers
49,188.00
1 Secretary
17,395.00
3 Substation Clerks
46,380.00
55 1/3 TOTAL .
. . . . . .
$ 1,500,22 -7.00*
Overtime . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
103,460.00-11
109 Anticipated Salary Increase. . . . . .
163,394.00*
Travel Expenses . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
5,000.00
Office Supplies . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
12,500.00
SUBTOTAL .
. . . . . .
$ 1,784,601.00
Count; Overhead (11.6 %) .
. . . . . .
207,014.00
TO-AT . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
*TIiiG COSTS:
vehicle Costs:
10 `Larked U.itS (Based on 381,600
dies at 11.8c /mile). . . . . . . . . . $ 45,029.00
5 -ed Units (Based on 23,000
mi -es ask�an 8.8pi ni le) . . . . . . . . . . $ 11,000.00
1 Gnmar<ed Unit (Based on 25,000
miles at Li.BC /mile). . . . , . . I $ 2,950.00
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unit `:ainter.ance Costs:
10 Marked Uni!:s (Based on 576,000
riles at 4.560 11ni7c). . . . . . . . . . $ 2;,994,00
3 Grant Unity (!lased on 60,000
..,ilex 4_ 4. c6c!- :,ile) . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,916.00
6 Uipnarked U::i is (Based o:. 150,0010
-41es at 4,SLq; mile). $ „290,00
Loa; Units (eased on 24,000 mi.les
at 23.EC /mile). . . . . . . . . . . $ ,664.00
•
T'C _'AL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SC'HEDULL' - 2 1 Or 2
$ 1,991,615.CO
$
58.979.00
43,364,00
UFPORT EQL'-n;.FN'T.
Equipment
depreciated
over 5 vears . .
. . $ 12,390.00
Equipment
depreciated
oaer 7 years . .
. . S 1,062.00
Equipment
depreciated
over 10 years. .
. . S 3,635.00
TOTAL . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. .
ELI COPTEP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS
•
$ 17,057.00
$ 37,101.00* *%
S 2,146,646.00
delve Equal Monthly Payments at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R 179,05= .OG /mc
P.ctue;. costs 04 bcmeL't s and overtime to be adjuster
acccrdi.nr to the -F ' 60 /81 Emplcyee F•iemcrandur., of U-.6erstan6in ,
Actual costs to be ciiar,eed, nur.'c «cr'_y e =ti ;�e tes Co be Wade ar,d
supplied to City.
* Actual costs to be adiusted o County rate when estabi•:shed on
or about Jul -, 198ri.
SCHEDULE "A" - PAGE 2 OF ,'.
•
•
RLNC'r.0 CUCA?fO.1'GA
• COST r!,ALYSIS
'r'Y 80/81
CAPTAIN:
Salary "E" Step
Retirement
Worker's Comb,
Health Insurance
Life Insurance
X ?,rit /L'nifc=s
TOTAL
1, Captain x $41,201.00
Salary- "E" Step
• Retirement
Worker's Come.
Hea' th Insurance
Life Insurance
Yer:t /unifcrr..s
TOTAL
1 Lieutenant x S371,754,00
SERGE
Salary "E" Step
Retircc.ent
Worker's Comp,
Health insurance
Life Insurance
Xerit /iJnifor:is
TOTAL
5 SerL,-..ts (26 .-") x
1 Sergeant (14 JD) ., $18,5'33.00 = .
66
S 31,019.20
$ 6,196.00
$ 2,092.80
$ 1,3310.40
$ 83.20
8 499.20
S 41.200.80
, . . . . . . . $ 41,201.00
$ 28,303.20
$ 5,651.20
S 1,906.40
$ 1,310.40
$ 83.2"
4-09,20
$ 37,753.60
. . . . . S 37.75.03
$ 25,675.20
$ 5,121.60
$ 1,728.00
$ 1,310.40
S 83.20
$ 499.20
$ 34,417.60
$ 172090.00 = S 190 62.00
$ 10,,533.00
DETECTI%t
Salary "E" Step $ 22,692.80
Retirement S 4,534.40
Worker's Corp. $ 1,539.20
Health insurance $ 1,310.40
.;erit /Unifoms $ 790.40
TOTAL $ 30,867.20
4 Detectives (26 PP) x $30,867.00 = S 123,46800
1 Decective (14PP) x $16.621.00 = $ 16,621..00
DEPUTY:
Salary "E" Step
Retirement
Worker's Comp.
Healt?: Insurace
Merit/Uniforms
30 Deputies x ,'$25,'_94,00
5 Grant Deputies x $24,932,00
(23 Fay Periods)
LT:i, TED DU%' �EFLil
Sala - }• Step
Re t__ _,..�.L
�tiL rLeT�S CO ^..p,
Health Insurance
i.ife Ilisarance
'.:erit!�.Sforas
1/3 Limiter Doty
S,22,610.0:,
•
$ 140,089.00
$ 20,571.20
S 4,118.40
$ 1,393.60
$ 1,310.40
$ 790.40
TOTAL $ 28,184,00
_ . . . . . . . . . . . $ 845, 52000
. . . . . . . . . . , $ 124,660.00
TOTAL S 970,180,00
$
16,120.00
S
',224,00
$
1,081.60
S
1,3;.0.40
$
8.3, 20
S
790, L0
TOTAL $
22,609.60
_ . . . . . . . . . . . 8 7,537.00
•
D1 SPAT CHER:
• Salary "F" Seep
Retirement
Worker's Comv.
Healy, Insurance
Li:e Insurance
3 D'_spatcaer.s x $16,396.00
SE Ci.E"ARY 11:
Salary "r" Stcp
Retirement
Worker's Comp.
Health Insurance
:.i.e insurance
0 1 Secretary II x $17,395.00
S*�EST,.Ti O:; CLER
•
salary Ste?
netirenent
..._leer's Co:ap.
Heal -h Insurance
,.: =e 1. urence
S 13,915.20
$ 1,830.40
$ 41.6C
S 603.20
$ 6.00
TCTAL S 16,396,46
. . . . . . . . . . . S 49,185.00
$ 14,799.20
� 1 94C.S0
$ 603.20
$ 6.00
TOTAL $ 17,394.S0
= . . . . . . . . . . . $ 17, 395.00
$ 13,104.00
$ 726.40
$ 20.30
$ 603.20
$ 6.00
TO'iPS. S 15,460.40
3 S.bstation Clerks x $15,460.00 = . . . . . . . . . S 46,300.00
67
OVE 'D COL' ;PPEAR.4\CES I
Estimated cvert-:ne hours for FS 80,'81
140 g urs deputy per year at
timE -;c. one half ($15. 51 /hr.) s
30 de ?-`ties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65, 1,2. C:.',
Esci::atec court days per deputy per
year is 16 at i.S hours per appear-
ance _ _nd one calf
x K deputies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C i'i, E7,05
Traffic Grant over _:ee is est ...-ted
at 10 (33 pay periods) per deputy at
time and one half (515.51 /hr.) x
5 deputies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S
•
timated overtinc 'hours per
detective per year is 22L hours at
time and one ha-_f ($i %.11r'hr.)
5 detectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 19 '
, tC J. Ci
_'G_KL . . . . . . . .
l nAIEL WOWS:
General Law Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . .. 4, 0!' :O.00i •
Traffic .._c... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S i
TC
% :iC E C2,STS
i.e r.'_- - arke: t .. re rc::ased
Ar 17 79 W. will rec re y _eplace:.
mid t :Ser1580 - cn
rived unit is e-:pacted W log 60,033,
miles per con year however, c'r,:c
to do:.-: time the _ ill I 37,6c")
miles loan ,.:.1. log 24,0f. .-...:es
per year on -he
d nis .
_;;cr. Unit 'base.' on ,(,CO
'riles 02 moo.., period) at
11. SC I-,,. I's . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 6,797.0^
9 : •E-nhc,6 _cs sec 324,50C
_cis (7,5 ,.. period)
1 : -61 :_ile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 33,232.00
r.0 tlla1 Costs of sala -_ s ❑nG Cl'netlts
to be adjusted according to Pi 80/5;
Ecployee :?emsrandu.-t of Lnderstr.ndi ;: /
•
Unmarked Units:
• 5 Lht=arked Units based on 125.000
miles per year at 8.8c /mile . . . . . . . $ li'000.0C
1 Uu=arked Unit based on 25,000
.,.files per year at 11.80mile. . . . . . . S 2,950.00
TOTAL. . . . . . . . . . $ 58,979.00
Lr7I' D'1,IV,Ef�� ?;CE COSTS:
10 Marked U:i is (Based on 576,000
miles at 4.860 /mile) . . . . . . . . . . . . S 27,99 -.00
3 Grant Cnits (Based on 60,000
Plies at 4.860 /wile) . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,9:6.0"
6 Unmarked Units (Based on 150,000
m`_ies at 4.860 /mile) . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,290.00
Loan Units (Based on 24,000 miles
TOTAL. . . . . . . $ 43,56 ='.00
E ?,.ER GENC1' T'QL:I ?b.4 i:T WITH 5 ]EP.HS LIFT. E }'T EC ANC'i'
• Marked Unit:
ig-a Bar
Sire
Speaker
Shotgun Pack (Elect)
Sic-gun
Switches
Cases
First Kit, ire
o in�LiSiler
S':.vel, Blankets and Ccnes (18 ")
iCO Foot Steel Tare
,lu_.per Cable, 16 _eet
iti -Cn• n::ei Pan:; :field Fadio
?ush Bar
Forensic ...•:esti a"ve ":it
Si F L
T C
Actual Cost to be adi'asted to County Rate
when escablisi•.ed on or a'ooue Jule, i930
5 25^ ,O:
$ 240. G',
S 50.00
S 42.00
$ 140.00
$ 4C.00
$ 200. C0
$ 160.00
$ 15.00
$ 10.00
$ 1,350.( %G
$ 55.00
S 00.00
S 2, 752.OG
$ 165.00
S 2,017.00
Unmarked Unit:
Red '_4 ght and Siren
Shotgun. and Case
.First Aid Kit and Fire Ext_ineuisht-
.;=per Cable, 16 feet
Multi- Channel Hand Held Radio
Forensic Investigative Kit
S' TCT.;L
6`; TAX
TOTAL
Inflation at 9`,e per year x 5 years = 45);
455 x $4,934.00 actual costs = $2,243.00
;2,243.00 inflation + $4,934.00 = .$7,227.00
actual costs
1/5 of $7,227.00 = $1,445.00
$ 200,00
$ '_50.01
$ 40. CO
$ 10.00
$ 1,350.00
s 200.0,0
S 1,950.00
$ 1:7,00
S 2,067.00
Items Detreciated Over 5
Years:
FY 78;'9 Contract
(Tam; year costs of
support
ecuip-.entj
S 9,3:.5.00
79150 Contract
;Second vear costs of
support
ecu pment)
$ 1,6(`,0.00
F1 3:.j 61 CJ::Lr3ct
(FL_rst year costs of
support
LgCsilpment)
q 1 L-5.00
T��TAL
EQ:;fP: :i;'= 4:I5'H 7 .4i;D 1C YE__ LIFE_ E:i?ECTA: _CS
Two >:o'cil: ::ulti- Cnenr.ei Radios S 2,900,00
6': 7A.: $ 174. CO
TOT:1L $ 2,074.00
63;: x $3,074.,'Q act
t'-1 2Z i.On
Cos":;;
1;7 cc S7,Oi1.00
Jear .. ,Lars
.al cestt = 51,937.)0
?6
11
S 1^, J90. CC
•
items Depreciated Over 7 Years:
•FY 70/60 Contract
(Second year costs of support eau_Dmc-nt) $ 3v6.00
FY 80/61 Contract
( ?first year costs of support equipment) $ 716.OG
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . $ 1,062.00
_tems Denreciated Over 10 Years:
I 75;79 Centracz
(T ^ird year costs of support equip: =ent) $
TO—,.L $ 3,E35.00
OFFiCL SL�,PLiES:
Yiscel:aneous office egcipmene and sucnli.es . . . . . . . . . 8 '_2,500.00
HEL?CG:iEF, PATROL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 37,101.00
•
7(
9
CITY OF RANC1 -10 CLU&MOWA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 18, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Establishing a Resolution in Support of Raised
Landscape Median Islands for Foothill Boulevard
BACKGROUND: Council and the Planning Commission have, in the past, expres-
sed their concern for the positive development of certain thoroughfares in
the City. Foothill Boulevard is the major east -west arterial and traffic
corridor through Rancho Cucamonga. It has been designated as a special
boulevard and scenic highway in the General Plan. To improve traffic safety,
raised traffic medians have been required and are conditions of approval for
development along Foothill.
In addition to the positive aspects of traffic control, the landscaped median
islands will effectively implement the theme of a Special Boulevard as desig-
nated on the General Plan. The General Plan policies, relative to Foothill
Boulevard, were intended to create increased aesthetics, a scenic highway,
a reduction of heat gain through the incorporation of landscaping and improve-
ment of the overall City image.
At its meeting of May 28, 1980, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 80-26, outlining the City's intent in requiring raised land-
scaped median islands for developments as they occur along Foothill Boule-
vard and communicated the same to CALTRANS.
RECOMMENDATION: If the Council concurs with the Planning Commission Reso-
lution, then we recommend approval of the attached city Council Resolution.
ReSpectfu }l1 j submitted,
Ir ,
i
I
JACY:L ,1� 'r
Community Development
JL:jk
Attachments
lor,
RESOLUTION NO. 80- 56
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF
A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO CALTRANS FOR RE-
QUIRING RAISED LANDSCAPED MEDIAN ISLANDS ON
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AS DEVELOPMENT OCCURS FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SPECIAL BOULEVARD DE-
SIGNATION OF THE GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a General
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan recognizes Foothill Boulevard as
a major thoroughfare and scenic highway and thus is designated as a
special boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan circulation element presently
recognizes that four or six lane thoroughfares with continuous left -
hand turning lanes are unattractive and intimidating to pedestrians
and that landscaped median islands would provide an opportunity to
improve streetseape and control circulation improvements; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan indicates that detailed plans are
required setting forth the design standards for each special boule-
vard. Therefore, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga finds that:
. 1. Requirement of raised landscaped median islands on
Foothill Boulevard is needed for implementation of
the General Plan.
n
2. That such median islands will provide the necessary
improvements for proper traffic circulation as the
City develops and will tend to promote better traffic
safety and control along Foothill Boulevard,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga hereby sets forth a requirement for the im-
plementation of raised landscaped median islands
along Foothill Boulevard.
2. That a certified copy of this Resolution be for-
warded to CALTRANS indicating the policy of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga relative to raised medians
along Foothill Boulevard.
73
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF OUNE, 1980. •
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
•
•
7�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA wcA.Ho
MEMORANDUM 0
• F
June 12, 1980 1977
TO: council /City Manager _
FROM: Harry Empey - Finance Director
SUBJECT: New Fund Creation /Special Appropriations
Consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's new budget requirements
is the need to create several new funds. Attached are resolutions es-
tablishing these new funds and below is a brief description of each.
(1) Capital Replacement Fund- This fund is necessary to establish the
means by Which the City will be able to replace capital equipment, As
mentioned in my memo of June 9, 1980, the capital replacement fund will,
in essence, rent to the using departments, the equipment. The rental
fee will be a reserve set aside each year. The reserve will be deter-
mined by using depreciation (straight line), and an inflationary factor
such as the consumer price index each year. Recommend Council transfer
from reserves $205,000 already appropriated for capital replacement to
this fund.
(2) Insurance Fund- Some of the City's insurance programs carry with
them a--certain deductible amount. It is this deductable amount that
needs to have a reserve set aside. The premium for all insurance will
be paid from this fund, and City insurance as an overhead factor will
become self funded.
(3) Capital Reserve Fund- This, in essence was, approved with this
years budget, but the resolution establishing it needs to be adopted.
This, like the insurance, is a vehicle for funding City facilities for
future use and consideration.
(q) Benefit Contingent Fund- From time to time, employees may be off
( work fora considerable length of time; due to illness, injury, or a
specially approved vacation. This period of time may be of such dura-
tion so as to warrant hiring temporary replacement until the regular
employee is able to return to work. Recommend Council appropriate
$38,512 into this fund now.
(5) Central Service Fund- This fund will be used to operate a central
stores, duplication processes, and provide a system for monitoring and
replacing certain fixed assets.
June 12, 1980
New Fund Creation Memo Continued
(6) S ec riation- In an effort to save money or interest, in
this ial case 718A ,0ro 00, wou d recommend appropriating $265,000 from this years
revenue to purchase the heavy equipment to implement the street program. .
In reviewing the lease purchase agreement program previously approved by
Council, it was discovered that by paying for the equipment this year, the
City will be able to free up funds for next year that will be necessary to
meet the demands for storm damage related costs. Also, as a leased piece
of equipment, there is some question as to whether it can be capitalized.
By not capitalizing it, difficulties arise in running it through the Capital
Replacement Fund for future replacement as it wears out. One other item
by acting now on the purchase of some of this equipment, the City may be
in line for an occassional rebate.
The foregoing changes represent the results of the City analysis of
Proposition 4, that is the new funds. The appropriation of $265,000
is indicative of a conservative approach to revenue forcasting. As
the resultant availability of money is due to the extraordinary growth
from sales tax.
•
•
�'
Co
Ll
9
RESOLUTION NO. 80-57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A CAPITAL REPLACEMENT FUND.
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish certain funds for the proper
administering of City finances and,
WHEREAS, Government Code authorizes the establishment of capital
funds to account for and provide the replacement of certain assets;
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, does resolve that a capital replacement fund be established.
77
• RESOLUTION NO. 80 -58
•
n
U
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN INSURANCE FUND.
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish certain funds for the proper
administering of City funds.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved and ordered by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga that an insurance fund be established to pro-
vide the payment of the unfunded protion of the City insurance pro-
grams.
)IF
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 80-59
A RESLOUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A CAPITAL RESERVE FUND.
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish certain funds for the proper
administering of City finances.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved and ordered by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga that a capital reserve fund be established
to provide funding for future City facilities.
77
•
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING 'A BENEFIT CONTINGENT FUND.
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish certain funds for the proper
administering of City finances.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved and ordered by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga that a benefit contingent fund be
established to pay for replacement employees of those employees
who may be off work for extended periods of time.
E
RESOLUTION NO. 80-61
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A CENTRAL SERVICES FUND.
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish certain funds for the proper ad-
ministering of the City finances.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved and ordered by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga that a central services fund for the use of
central stores, duplication, and replacement of certain fixed assets as
they wear out, are destroyed or lost.
CITY OF RAI\'CHO CLK \UNGA aa'`n^AWO
STAFF REPORT n,
Is
DATE: June 18, 1980
1977
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Specific Plan Revision for Base Line Blvd. Between
Haven Ave. and Milliken Ave.
At its meeting of February 13, 1980, the Planning Commission
discussed the issue of the possible removal of the Eucalyptus
trees on the south side of Base Line, east of Haven Ave., at
the time of widening Base Line. Both the existing County -
adopted specific plan and the City -wide Traffic Study call
for a 6 -lane roadway along Base Line between Haven Ave. and
Rte. 15. A road of this large size presents conflicts with
either the high voltage power line along the north side of the
existing road, the trees or both, depending on the road's
alignment and width.
• The result of the Planning Commission's consideration (staff
report and minutes attached) was that it would be best not to
try to work the existing trees into the street landscaping.
Factors considered were: the senstivity of the trees to
changes in soil level and irrigation; the limited life span
of such trees; the number of trees in good condition and gaps
in the windrow. A factor considered previously was the very
high cost of relocating the 66KV power line on the north side,
a cost which would not achieve any gain in aesthetics (this
power line cannot be undergrounded).
Another factor for Council consideration is the presence of
a high pressure water line for San Gabriel Valley MWD, which
parallels the south side of the existing pavement as far as
future Milliken Ave. Fast of Milliken, the water line follows
the presently adopted specific plan ROW, which puts it some
distance south of the road.
Taking the foregoing into consideration, the most desirable
alignment for Base Line Blvd. would place the high voltage
power line within the ROW, on the north side and position the
northerly lanes such that the bridge over Deer Creek will
avoid the high pressure water line and thus the need for
relocation. By removing the Eucalyptus trees, this could be
done within a 120' ROW and thus not create an unusual dedica-
tion requirement.
9
7 �a
tic Plan ..Sion _ Li— B1,
Between Haven Ave. and Milliken Ave.
June 18, 1980
Page 2
Q
East of future Milliken Ave. (the present railroad and jog to
the north), the power poles and water line are so far apart
that roadway ROW will not be able to accommodate both; also,
trees are not a consideration. At Rochester and to the east,
there will be many special considerations (Day Creek, Heublein,
etc.) and specific alignments should be considered only when
development master plans are further along.
A large scale exhibit has been prepared showing the recommend-
ed alignment from Haven to Milliken. The existing specific
plan alignment calls for 120 feet of ROW. This width would
not be changed, only the location of the 120 foot strip is
changed slightly. Since the property on both sides of the
road is under the same ownership, the recommendation causes
no change in dedication requirement. It can be seen also
that under any circumstances, about 750 feet of trees would
have to be removed in order to provide a safe transition into
the Special Boulevard section just east of Haven Ave.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Council approve preparation of a •
Specific Plan revision from Haven to Milliken which provides
for retention of the existing power line in place in the
future right -of -way; replacement of the trees with appropriate
new plantings and a transition into the existing Specific Plan
alignment at Milliken Ave.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:PAR:jaa
`i63
•
0
J
9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA"UA
STAFF REPORr
June 11, 1980
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman V"
City Manager
SUBJECT: Recommendation t Lmp lement
Deferred Compens ion Program
The City Council has approved in concept a recommendation to provide additional
deferred compensation as recognition of the responsibilities required of
management employees. The attached Resolution will implement the program at
a contribution rate of 2 percent of the employee's salary. It is significant
to note, however, that before a management employee becomes eligible to re-
ceive the deferred compensation benefit, a recommendation must be submitted
by the Department Head and be approved by the City Manager. Only management
employees who are performing satisfactorily in their positions will be
eligible to receive this additional management benefit.
RECOMMENDATION: li Is recomnanded that the City Council approve Resolution
No. 80 -54 implementing a deferred compensation program. It is significant to
note that funds have been included in the 1980 -81 budget for this program.
Implementation date will be July 1, 1980.
LMW:baa
attach.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -54
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
AN EMPLOYEES' DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AND
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH GLENDALE FEDERAL
SAVINGS FOR COORDINATING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY EMPLOYEES' DEFERRED COMPENSATION.
WHEREAS the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to provide an
Employee Deferred Compensation Plan,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. An Employee Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby
adopted. The City consents to a Plan and assumes the obligation to be performed
on its part as set forth in the Plan.
Section 2. The Plan shall be effective and shall apply to
compensation earned after the effective date. The City consents to the partici-
pation of any employee, or officer, subject to participation to be in accordance
with the Participation Agreement.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
the Resolution and shall cause this Resolution to be entered into the records of
the City Council of this City.
Section 4. The proposed Agreement with the firm Glendale
Federal Savings to serve as Plan Administrator /Coordinator of the above Plan
is hereby approved.
Section 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute
said Agreement and all other documents and initiate all other procedures to
implement said Plan, and
, w `' )
Section 6: The City shall contribute two (2) percent of
annual salary for management /middle management employees authorized by the City
Manager, to the deferred compensation program in accordance with the City of
Rancho Cucamonga's Personnel Rules and Regulations and the concurrence of the
City Council.
Section 7. The date of implementation of the Deferred
Compensation Plan shall be duly 1, 1980.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 1980.
Is Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 18, 1980 vN �Yh
To: City Council and City Manager
1977
From: From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services
Subject: Agenda Item 6 -A Project Esperanza Funding Request
Armando Navarro telephoned to suggest a "counterproposal" to the
staff recommendation submitted to Council by this writer June 12.
That staff recommendation, which was to take no funding action
until September 3, was discussed with Dr. Navarro by phone on Monday
June 16. He was, understandably, interested in an immediate firm
financial commitment in some form by the City, but said that our
approach was "fair enough ".
At 1:45 p.m. this date a counterproposal was made as follows:
'Fund Art Ayala from July 1 as the Site Manager, and delay
consideration of the balance of request (Executive Director
and Recreation Coordinator) until September.'
Ayala is currently funded thirty hours a week by S.B. Co. CSD
through September as a "Consumer Advocate ". Navarro wants him now
at forty hours to control and direct entire program rather than part
time under the guise of a consumer advocate,
Staff Comment and Recommendation: Navarro's idea is not without merit,
however, I still hold with the orginal recommendation of June 12. Council
may, however, wish to supplement Ayala's funding to a full time level
with the condition that he is the Site Manager and will serve as liason
with City.
BH /mw
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community Center,
9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, June 18, 1980. The meeting was
called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who led in the pledge to
the flag.
Present: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palumbo, Arthur H.
Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser.
Also present: City Manager, Lauren Wasserman; Assistant City Attorney, Robert
Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director,
Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs; Community Services Director, Bill Holley.
Approval of Minutes; Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to approve the minutes of
June 4, 1980. Motion carried 5 -0.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
a. Mayor Schlosser thanked all those who had worked in the Spring Clean -up Campaign.
b. Francis Passarelli, Chairman, thanked the Council for the opportunity to be of
service to the community.
c. Mayor Schlosser read a letter of resignation from Laura Jones as a Planning
Commissioner to be effective August 1, 1980. It was accepted with regrets.
d. Apnointment of Planning Commissioners:
Applicants were: Richard Dahl, incumbent
Sharon Romero
Jorge Garcia, incumbent
Larry Wolff
Arnold Anderson
Jeff Sceranka
Wanda Dixon
Jim McGuire
Gary Kortepeter
Dennis Stout
Bruce Chitiea
Bill Wieland
City Clerk Wasserman distributed paper for voting a secret ballot to the Council.
Each Councilman was to vote for two Planning Commissioners. Mayor Schlosser and
the City Clerk counted the ballots. Results were announced by the mayor which were
that Richard Dahl and Jeff Scerankawere the new Planning Commissioners with terms
of four years.
Mayor set the date of July 2 for the consideration of the replacement for the
resignation of Laura Jones.
e. Mayor Schlosser announced that tonight's meeting would adjourn to an executive
session.
f. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to direct staff to prepare Re-
solutions and plaques commending Mr. Garcia and Mrs. Jones for their services
to the community. Motion carried 5 -0.
g. Mayor Schlosser announced that Barry Hogan had been appointed to SCAG's Planning
Directors Committee.
h. Mr. Wasserman requested that item "g" be removed from the Consent Calendar and
Resolution Yo. 80 -57 should be numbered 80 -62.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
a, Approval of Warrants - Register No. 80 -6 -19 for $269,783.70.
b. Set public hearing for July 2, 1980 for zone change No. 80 -07 - C. H. Brubaker.
A zone change from R -1- 20,000 to R -1- 10,000 for property located on the
sotheast corner of Banyan and Amethyst Street. Assessor's Parcel No. 1062 - 401 -11.
c. Set public hearing for July 2, 1980 for appropriation of Revenue Sharing Funds.
d. Award of Street Tree Maintenance Contract. It is recommended that West Coast
Arborist, Buena Park, as low bidder, be awarded the contract. Approximate
total cost: $2,156.00.
e. Request purchase of 100 decor tile plaques at a cost of $1,086 plus tax from
Recognition Inc., Sante Fe Springs. Funds to be appropriated from contingency
account.
f. Refer claim for damages in the amount of $1,547.09 by Gary Guy to the City
Attorney for handling.
g. �reee-9639t-- A «epeeneref -Map;- Bender- end - Agreement--- e3�mer +-- 6k,evren
Eeneervet }en- 6e-- -6eeel tent- -NerN+ ease- earner- ef-- Amethyee- end- 6emen -en -3}
}e!e- teee }inE- } }r6- eeree. Item deleted from agenda.
h. Parcel Map 5792: Acceptance of Map, Bonds, and Agreement. Owner: Lewis
Properties. Location: West side of Archibald approximately 470 feet north of
Base Line; 3 lots on 16 acres.
Performance Bond (surety) $ 46,000
Labor 6 Material (surety) 46,000
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL
MAP NUMBER 5792, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5792),
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
i. Release of Bonds:
Tract 9083: Located north of Arrow Route and east of Hellman Avenue.
Owner: John C. Heera, Inc.
Cash Staking Bond $ 2,500
Tract 9083 -1: Located north of Arrow Route and east of Hellman Avenue.
Owner: John C. Beers, Inc.
Cash Staking Bond $ 3,400
Tract 9083 -4: Located north of Arrow Route and east of Hellman Avenue
Owner: John C. Beers, Inc.
Cash Staking Bond $ 2,950
Tract 9083 -5: Located north of Arrow Route and east of Hellman Avenue.
Owner: John C. Hears, Inc.
Cash Staking Bond $ 4,100
OWNER: Thomas W. Kendall
141 Emerald Bay
Laguna Beach, California 92651
Cash Staking Bond $3,650
Tract 9446: located on the west side of Baker between 8th and 9th Streets
OWNER: Kingsway Construction Company
110 West "A" Street, Suite 590
San Diego, California 92101
Performance Bond (Block Wall) $7,700
Tract 9454: Located on the west side of Haven Avenue north of the Southern
Pacific Railroad
OWNER: Lewis Homes of California
P.O. Box 670
Upland, California 91786
Performance Bond (Road) $148,000
Performance Bond (Water) 34,800
Performance Band (Sewer) 40,800
Tract 9582 -2 Located on the north side of Wilson Avenue at Beechwood Drive
OWNER: The Deer Creek Company
P. 0. Box 488
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
Performance Bond (Road) $138,000
Parcel Map 4594: Located at the northeast corner of Jersey Boulevard and
Haven Avenue
OWNER: C 6 L Homes
521 North Mountain Avenue
Upland, California 91786
Performance Bond (Road) $131,500
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve the Consent Calendar
with item "g" deleted, Motion carried 5 -0.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
5A. AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE GARRETT AND COMPANY WINERY AS AN HISTORIC
LANDMARK. Mr. Wasserman presented a brief staff report.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 109, a second reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
GARRETT AND COMPANY WINERY AS A SIGNIFICANT HiS'iORIC
FEATURE OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT
AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion
carried 5 -0.
The mayor opened the meeting for a public hearing. There being no response, the
hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance No. 109, Motion
carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser.
58. AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 105, THE PARK DEDICATION ORDINANCE. Staff re-
port by Bill Holley.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of ORDINANCE N0. 105 -A, a second reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 105.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion
carried 5 -0.
The mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve Ordinance No. 105 -A.
Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and
Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
5C. REDUCTION OF SPEED LIMIT ON A PORTION OF SAPPHIRE STREET. Staff report by
Lauren Wasserman.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of ORDINANCE NO. 39 -B, a second reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 39 PERTAINING TO THE SPEED LIMIT ON SAPPHIRE
STREET.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion
carried 5 -0.
The mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance No. 39 -B.
Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and
Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
AND
report
City Clerk Wasserman read titles of ORDINANCE NO. 28 -A, a first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUB-
SECTION 2.12 OF ORDINANCE NO. 28 TO PROVIDE
CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL
OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN A
PERIOD OF NINE (9) MONTHS FOLLOWING THE RE-
CORDATION OF A PARCEL MAP FOR EACH LOT UPON
WHICH THERE EXISTS A BUILDING OR OTHER USABLE
STRUCTURE AT THE TIME OF SUCH RECORDATION.
ORDINANCE NO. 58 -B (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 58 TO PERMIT THE USE OF LIEN
AGREEMENTS AS SECURITY FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUC-
TION OF OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS.
Motion: Mo:ed by Palumbo, seconded by Frost to waive further reading. Motion
carried 5 -0. NOES: None, ABSENT: None.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the hearing was closed.
Frost questioned if this would not set a precedent. He favored the way this was
presently being handled with the Planning Commission and City Council approving
each one on an individual basis. After further discussion, staff recommended
that thev work on some standards and come back to the next meeting.
Council concurred and referred item back to staff for further study.
5E. INDUSTRIAL AREA STORM DRAIN POLICY. Mr. Wasserman asked that this item be
continued to the July 2 meeting. Council concurred.
5F. CONTINUATION OF HEARING ON ADOPTION OF PROPOSED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1980 -81. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman.
Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing
was closed.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to adopt the budget for fiscal year
1980 -81 for $8,717,326. Motion carried 5 -0.
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. -
6A. PROJECT ESPERANZA FUNDING REQUEST. Staff report by Bill Holley
Dr. Navarro, National Institute of Community Development, presented an oral report
and requested financial assistance for the Project Esperanza.
Bridge said he concurred with Dr. Navarro's suggestions and felt staff should
investigate funding sources to satisfy this requirement.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to direct staff to seek for funds for
this request of $11,000 and to direct staff to seek further options to have Mr.
Ayala come on as a city staff member. The funding request is for the period of
July 1, 1980 through June 30, 1981. Motion carried 5 -0.
6B. AWARD OF STREET SWEEPER CONTRACT. Mr.. Wasserman recommended that Council
reject all bids and to direct staff to write new specifications and go out for new
bids.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palomboto concur with staff's recommendation
to reject all bids, write new specifications, and to advertise for new bids. Motion
carried 5 -0.
6C. SHERIFF'S CONTRACT. Staff report by Capt. Tom Wickum.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels approve the Sheriff's Contract for
the fiscal year 1980 -81. Motion carried 5 -0.
60. SUPPORT OF RAISED LANDSCAPE MEDIAN ISLANDS FOR FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. Staff
report by Jack Lam.
Mayor opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, the public
portion was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. 80 -56
and to waive further reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES:
Frost, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Title
read by City Clerk Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO CALTRANS
FOR REQUIRING RAISED LANDSCAPED MEDIAN ISLANDS
ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AS DEVELOPMENT OCCURS FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SPECIAL BOULEVARD DE-
SIGNATION OF THE GENERAL PLAN.
6E. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AUTHORITY FOR VARIOUS FUNDS. Report by Harry
Empey.
Mayor opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, the public
portion was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 80 -57
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read
title.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
CAPITAL REPLACEMENT FUND.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to approve Resolution No. 80 -58
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read
title.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -58
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN
INSURANCE FUND.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 80 -59
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read
title.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
CAPITAL RESERVE FUND.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 80 -60
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried 5-0. City Clerk Wasserman read
title.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
BENEFIT CONTINGENT FUN!:.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. 80 -61
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read
title.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -61
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
CENTRAL SERVICES FUND.
Mr. Empey also asked Council if they would approve the appropriating of the
$265,000 for a cash purchase instead of the lease /purchase. Council had approved
this previously.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve the purchase of special
equipment as a cash purchase instead of through a lease /purchase arrangement.
Motion carried 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 8:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:45 p.m.
with all members of Council and staff present.
6F. ADOPTION OF A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND
ROCHESTER AVENUE. Report by Paul Rougeau, Associate Civil Engineer.
Mayor opened the meeting for public comment.
Kay Matlock, Lewis Homes, said thev supported the staff's recommendation.
Mayor closed the public portion.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve prepapration of a
Specific Plan revision from Haven to Milliken which provides for the retention of
the existing power line in place in the future right -of -way; replacement of the
trees with appropriate new plantings and a transition into the existing Specific
Plan alignment at Milliken Avenue. Motion carried 5 -0.
6G. PROPOSED POSITION CLASSIFICATION PLAN.
-Mr. Doug Ayres, Consultant, presented the position classification and compensation
plan to the Council.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to accept the report. Motion carried
5 -0.
6H. RECOMMENDATION TO IMPLEMENT DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM. Report by Lauren
Wasserman.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to change the amount of deferred
compensation from 2% to 38, approve Resolution No. 80 -54 with this change, and
to waive entire reading. Motion carried 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read title.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -54
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN
EMPLOYEES' DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AND APPROVING
AN AGREEMENT WITH GLENDALE FEDERAL SAVINGS FOR
COORDINATING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES'
DEFERRED COMPENSATION.
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none.
8. ADJOURNMENT.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to adjourn to an Executive Session not
to reconvene. Motion carried 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk