Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1980/01/16 - Agenda Packet
A G E N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Regular Fleeting Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga January 16, 1980 AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTE: Al2 items submitted for the city Council agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. PLEDGE TO FLAG. • B. ROLL CALL: Mikels3_, Palombo3, Schlosser —, Bridge __�, Frost) S.. C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 2, 1980. 13- cwCt�� 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS 91 a. Council b. Staff 3. COMMITTEE REPORTS li c<-*/% `"' •`"` `1 '"�'}� a. Advisory Commission b. Historical Commission 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following Consent Calendar items are oxpected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council member, staff member, or intcrestod party may re?uo.st that an item he removod from the Consont Calendar for later discussion. a. Approval of Warrants: register No. 80 -1 -19 in the amount of 1 $297,002.09. b. Tract 9582 -2: Release of bonds to Deer Creek Company 3 _ Performance Bond (water) E 63,000 (located on the north side of Wilson Avenue at Beechwood Dr.) G- L s City Council Agenda -2- January 16, 1980 • c. Tract 9602: Accept roads and release bond to Maytreyek 3 Homes, Inc. Located on the northside of San Bernardino Road east of Carnelian. Performance Bond (road) $132,000 -✓ d. Approval and execution of the chemical weed control agreement. 6 This agreement covers chemical weed control which was previously approved as a part of the parkway maintenance program. Ten thousand dollars was budgeted for this work and has been re- quested from the County. e. Parcel Map 5269: Approval of map and security offered by 12 the developer, H 8 S Properties. Located on 4.81 acres on the north side of Hillside east of Carnelian. Letter of Credit Performance $ 40,500 Letter of Credit Labor b Material $ 40,500 RESOLUTION NO. 80 -5 14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL • MAP NO. 5269, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 77- 0590), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. f. Approval and execution of agreement with Sedway /Cooke for the 15 preparation of the Industrial Specific Plan. The Council has seen this agreement once before but with the firm of John Blayney and Associates. We have since changed consultant firms. W,,Image,lalocatedcat 11837eFoothill License for Blvd. for on sale beer.' ,(�}4{,� x'33 �1 �Uti J nl 5� PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 79 -05 - City of Rancho 34 Cucamonga. An Ordinance establishing standards and review procedures for Planned Community Developments. On December 19 the City Council referred the Planned Community Ordinance back to the Planning Commission for their approval of a change in language. Changes had been made to the ordinance and it is now before Council for approval. ORDINANCE NO. 94 - 36 ' • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 79 -05 ESTABLISHING STANDARDS \ v AND REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTS. City Council Agenda -3- January 16, 1980 • B. An Ordinance to extend the moratorium date on adult businesses. 45 Since staff has not had sufficient time to draft an ordinance regulating adult businesses, it is necessary to extend the moratorium date. On February 1 the present moratorium expires. ORDINANCE NO. 45 -B (urgency) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING ORDINANCE 1) NUMBER 45 PERTAINING TO INTERIM ZONING FOR ADULT BUSINESSES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. Discontinuation of County Road Maintenance Contract. (Lloyd Hubbs) 46 At the time of execution of the 1979 -80 County contract for Road Maintenance, staff indicated that we were not in a position to fully evaluate the cost effectiveness of the County operation in relation to other contract options. It was recommended at that time that the Council approve the contract and direct staff to make an analysis of maintenance options. Council also authorized • RJA Maintenance Contractor, Inc. to conduct a Contract Management Analysis at no cost to the City. Both RJA and staff have completed their analysis and concur in a recommendation to discontinue the County Maintenance Contract and replace these services with a combination of City crews and private contract services. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council direct staff to notify the San Bernardino County Road Department of its intention to discontinue maintenance services as of July 30, 1980 and instruct staff to make all arrangements necessary to assume those responsibilities through a combination of City staff and contract services. It is further requested that the Council authorize staff to solicit and receive bids for the acquisition of patching equipment for Council review and acquisition prior to July 1, 1980. B. Block Grant Funds - North Town Street Improvements. (Lloyd Hubbs) 53 The City Council has currently adopted the Community Development Program for the expenditure of $15,600 in Community Development block grant funds. These funds were programmed to include street improvements and park acquisition and development in the "North Town" area. • The fund allocations were based on preliminary cost estimates and the recommendation of the local Citizens' Participation Advisory Committee. The Committee's first priority has been the street improvement project. lJ e City Council Agenda -4- January 16, 1980 Because the total street project exceeds all funds available, the community was asked what their priority for fund allocation would be. It was the unanimous opinion of those present to fund the entire street project to completion before any park development. In order to phase the project to the availability of funds, the group was asked to prioritize street construction. The following was the adopted priority: Phase 1: Humbolt, 24th, 25th, and 26th Streets $354,334 (est cost) Phase 2: Feron, Reid, and Main (south side E/o Reid) Sts. $145,000 (est cost) Phase 3: Center and Main Streets $105,482 (est cost) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council adopt the community's recommendation to construct street improvements in North Town by the above listed priority sequence and to instruct staff to notify the County Community Development Department of this action to adjust the current program. As a first step in Vie implementation of the new program, it is recommended that the amendment to the design contract be executed by the Council for the increased design scope. This agreement covers the detail design and construction staking for the secondary and increases the $42,000 contract by $12,900. ,U Sa, i✓v c�,W"•^'`,S C. An oral report re. Lesnev Development Cols request for approval of 67 Report by Jack D. Discussion of Ballot Argument and Adoption of Resolution. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS MEMBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT FOR A CITY MEASURE. E. A Resolution namingoff_icers, pollin laces, and measures for the municipal election. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. 76 76 77 • City Council Agenda -5- January 16, 1980 RESOLUTION NO. 80 -7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 77 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF SAID CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO THE GENERAL LAW CITIES AND FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SAID CITY OF A CERTAIN QUESTION , MEASURE "A ", RELATING TO WHETHER THE OFFICES OF CITY CLERK AND CITY TREASURER SHALL BE APPOINTIVE, AT THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. F. School Fee Report. Staff report by Harry Empey. 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 8. NEW BUSINESS. a. Council • b. Audience 9. ADJOURNMENT. i y f: I'M 8867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (: WARR A VEN N V E N C 0 R N A M E C0362 150C BLUE CROSS OC363 9290 NEST ENO UNITED NAY OC364 8313 SAN ±RNONO CO EMPLOY C 00365 1200 BANK OF AMERICA 00366 2698 DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES ( 00367 3301 EMPEY PETTY CASH, HARRY 00368 8313 SAN BRNDNO CO EMPLOY C 00369 1200 BANK OF AMERICA 00370 5275 INTL CITY MGT ASSOC (: OC371 5279 INTL CONF OF BLDG OFFIC 00372 8905 UC IRVINE 00373 4625 GECOEN E CO, G C F 00374 7805 POSTMASTER (i 02925 4620 GILBERT, JIM 02940 6607 K -MART 4056 II �� 02988 VOIC FORMS ALIGNMENT 0?2990 00A0 ACtCtUSTICEAEy�GLLCEvILLyIYGS 8L4q 8, AEETgR Qpp([UYEEMCNTE.V , A H (' 02994 01 -5 dCT[CN� TR pVELR AS ENCY 02996 822 5 AL AR LOMARSCHOGLY DISTRI (, 02997 0450 ANTHONY POOLS 02998 048C ARENA FORD 02999 104C GORDON AVERS CAMERA SHO 03000 1300 BASELINE HARDWARP (' 03002 1898 CU ES EE LUMBERO LOO IBG GOS 03003 190C C G ENGINEERING 03004 t194cC C LRLtt JAESCHKE INC TT (' 03006 2396 LGNL FYYSN MFGAER SAIeSRCL •03007 244C CC OF SAN BONO FLOOD CT 03008 245C CO SAN BERNARDINO SHERI 03009 2455 CO SAN BCNO TRANSPORTAT (' 03010 250C COVINGTON L CROW. 03011 2575 CUCAMONGA GO WATER DIST 03012 2595 LUCA'AONGA PRINTING 03013 2610 dILL1AMS PRINTING, D 03014 264C CARL, SCCTY 03015 2900 C,UKE TIMBER CO I•NC 03016 3175 EASTMAN iNC 03017 3250 BILL ESPINOZA TIRE SERV 03018 3303 THE EMPIRE CC 03019 336C ERNIES ENTERPRISZS Il+� 03020 4007 FMC CORP 03021 413C FOOTHILL LAWNMOWER SERV 03022 4600 GENERAL TELEPHONIC CO 03023 469C GBIE GCRCON ELECTRICAL 03024 4700 GORDONS INC L' 03026 4810 HAMMr4TTT EA SONS SUPPLY 03028 4940 115 INOISCOF FABRICS 03029 514C INLANC POWER SWEEPING 03030 5200 INTE'NAL RFVENUF. SCRVIC 03031 6175 JOBS AVAILABLE 03032 6622 LMI 03033 6624 LEC °LECTRIC L 03034 6725 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 11 03035 6875 LOVES P0trER TOOLS 03036 7197 'CNALD MARTIN C ASSOC 03037 7281 '!EL EARS C THE ''HARPS L' 03038 7508 7ATICNAL LEAGUE OF CITI 03039 7820 ?RIC' COLOR PRESS 03040 8045 RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE 03041 8075 RAPIu' DATA INC 03042 8333 SEARS ROEBUCK C f,0 03043 8390 SOUT14ERN CALIF EDISON 03044 8395 SCUTHERN F GAS 45 8398 'OUTHANC PAPER CO CO L' 03046 8470 SPECIALTY TYPEWRITER SV � 1 I WARP, DATE NET 2, 5E9.32 71.19 967.00 4.563.43 170.00 299.38 644.50 4,605.20 126.55 40.00 130.00 320.00 70.00 320.00 - 43.92- I 8,439. 40. 52r 108. 139, 181. 40,608. 3r 978. 347. 220. 1,600 410. 474. 16,866. 1J.ou 4.15 219.13 56.40 698.56 95.40 86.80 1,296.25 433.40 73.90 20.00 2,934.00 761.00 60.00 135.00 47.97 46.00 169.00 409.97 172.00 9.44 421.34 45.00 f1 R867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t HARR 0 VEN M V E N 0 R N A M E 03047 8525 STATIONERS CORP 01048 8530 STOCKWELL E BINNEY 03049 8532 SULLIVAN, R 03050 866C TEODIS DEPOSITION SERV - -- 03051 8675 TEXACO INC 03052 893C UNIM6RK -MC DONALD INC c 03053 9990 XEROX CORP 03055 VOID YFINALOTOTALSI SERVICE �d � I c L L L l Q L `I HARR DATE NT NET 1/19/80 1/19/80 1,545 1/19/80 1/19/90 440. 1.35 1/19/80 50086 1/19/80 1/19180 4,655..00 1/1919/80 581,06 0.00 297,002.09 r1 LJ C, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 1980 TO: City Council 8 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR - RELEASE OF BONDS Tract 9582 -2 - Located on the north side of Wilson Avenue at Beechwood Drive OWNER: The Deer Creek Company P. 0. Box 488 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Performance Bond (Water) E 63,000 NOTE: The sanitary water system was approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on December 21, 1979. • Tract 9602 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the northside of San Bernardino Road east of Carnelian OWNER: Maytreyek Homes, Inc. P. 0. Box 1410 Upland, California 91786 Performance Bond (Road) $132,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve- ments include curb, gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs. • 3 S OF D SHEETS "i IMC -1- NO. 9602 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN!:fRNARDINO / DF.IIIG A SUAOIVISION OF LOT S, SIIDDIVICI04 W, CUCAMONGA , VINEYARD TRACT, AS PER HAP Ni. f.M ^. f.D IN P,K , ^.O, PAGE ,S, LANDMARK CONSULTANTS OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DERNARW:0 COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ' UPLAND, CALIFORNIA Adi A/C. lJeo .AS:, s 9,11 ,p .nc .�l /fir ✓krr :s.'e' _ _ �F�• � ['i. � v It .. C if p\\ ��CHIANTI .. oveiS' .see sweet e ti c 1 l _ Z w u F !• a h g 4 I • Rah I�ae Ltl "IF C01!il'FY OF SIN 1';13;lf..• nwo C11!:G A I ZDIVI$IE:N OF LOT F, SIgnIVw10N X11', CUCf ar'IRA /!w IRO TRACT, PS PER IrAP 111111111 IN RfnR 20, FAGR 45, OF "APS, RECORDS OF SAN OLRNAROINO OCUNrV, f.nl.l l'n,Rp1A, , -EET 2 of O SHCETS LANDMARK CO';SUI.TtNTS UPLAND, CALIFORNIA ;:1 > J, yt a a�+,.� fl —�,:Jw -.. ..',. n°.:.� Q ...Ce, •..ro./•w_ ✓!i Sr ,a•:w - -rie q'v "a r e n.^ fi n n y b N I: 1 ' ,'2 � ..._ ........ .ell `" ,,(F �.,r.i Y N nY..'s• l N x ���'�CCCccc` row'..* - �+� .•____.rc�v...._,._ `� •V L� ._ �S4Np':;U1P: 91'70___. ._.�`s'd : ; :`•, ... _._._..._ I/ .R I Qf R. OD 3 r✓.•. �, ENGINEER'S NOTES M roof 'el SCC ;H r 5 51 II I I ii �.,� �w ► ► ,y FI.tRDO': lNl'vClaal�l_Ej _ _ Js n_rs_•_ .r° °w p • --411 I�'im y 6 , -EET 2 of O SHCETS LANDMARK CO';SUI.TtNTS UPLAND, CALIFORNIA ;:1 > J, yt a a�+,.� fl —�,:Jw -.. ..',. n°.:.� Q ...Ce, •..ro./•w_ ✓!i Sr ,a•:w - -rie q'v "a r e n.^ fi n n y b N I: 1 ' ,'2 � ..._ ........ .ell `" ,,(F �.,r.i Y N nY..'s• l N x ���'�CCCccc` row'..* - �+� .•____.rc�v...._,._ `� •V L� ._ �S4Np':;U1P: 91'70___. ._.�`s'd : ; :`•, ... _._._..._ I/ .R I Qf R. OD 3 r✓.•. �, ENGINEER'S NOTES M roof 'el �.,� �w ,y FI.tRDO': lNl'vClaal�l_Ej l of r- $i "DUoO :T,-,T :i1VE ;�� ":: •`" , -EET 2 of O SHCETS LANDMARK CO';SUI.TtNTS UPLAND, CALIFORNIA ;:1 > J, yt a a�+,.� fl —�,:Jw -.. ..',. n°.:.� Q ...Ce, •..ro./•w_ ✓!i Sr ,a•:w - -rie q'v "a r e n.^ fi n n y b N I: 1 ' ,'2 � ..._ ........ .ell `" ,,(F �.,r.i Y N nY..'s• l N x ���'�CCCccc` row'..* - �+� .•____.rc�v...._,._ `� •V L� ._ �S4Np':;U1P: 91'70___. ._.�`s'd : ; :`•, ... _._._..._ I/ .R I Qf R. OD 3 r✓.•. �, ENGINEER'S NOTES M roof 'el CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 1980 TO: City Council 8 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL Attached for Council approval and execution are four copies of a Weed Control Agreement with the County Agriculture Department. This agreement covers chemical weed control previously approved as a part of the parkway maintenance program. $10,000 was budgeted for this work and has been requested from the County through Purchase Order No. 00309 as referenced in the agreement. This agreement clarifies the relationships under which the purchase order was issued. The spraying program will begin immediately and be completed in February. RECOMMENDATION: • It is recommended that the Council approve and execute the agreement. Respectfully submitted, "Lloyd ubbs City Oigineer LBH:deb CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM • DATE: January 09, 1980 TO: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer FROM: Monte Prescher, Asst. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL ON PARKWAYS AND SHOULDERS Attached are four copies of the Weed Control Agreement between the County and the City to be signed by the mayor and City Clerk. This program has already been approved and money has already been provided per recent Council action. Two of the four fully executed agreements are to be returned to the County and two are for our records. Respectfully submitted, • Monte Prescher Assistant Civil Engineer MP:cd • (�TIF , COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDINO CONTRACT TRANSMITTAL Cnnnly nrnarmgru t I» CONTRACT NUMBER Department of Agriculture r(rrU - ?z• (•'pyn1V Oep.l.n, C n.nMl Reerefenlinve r �i7 Ix Renavaple r] Terminates Don Schreiber phEo 383 -134 oate:Feb. 1, 1984 &KIV.1 Unit No. Suh 0111 ct No Fuml No, lob N0, Amvunt o anlncY 451 9604 001 10 000.00 Check One ❑ EapendR,ne fl A.nn. If ron lry has mere than one vNnern or rettipl, com0lele the lollonmg. " --TS — �• Feu M Numt— of mymens' Employer 10 r Enimamn anqun .1 each S Contractor: City of Rancho Cucamonga Contractor's Representative: Floyd Hobbs, City Engineer Address: 8076 Archibald Avenue, Cucamonga, CA 91730 phone: Nature of Contract: (Briefly describe the general terms of the contract! Weed control on City rights -of -way land by chemical means fins transmittal to elf cggtrarfs nor preparrd NI foe 'Standard Confrert- lormJ - nnfOVl!(f 5 In I t I» RNII!Wp IV Iy!( 1 . I.Vllpll(IIIIIf P. �Gbo r(rrU r IC \w r �i7 County Counsel ountV d(n nlstralive (lice - p., t pt 02-1320.401 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 �?wq 16 0 17 O� 020 18 : >?LL� o 19 $z�m 20 u ^a 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 PAG:vk 31 11 -29 -7'112 33 34 35 36 `. IS�I ]614161 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, effective when signed by both parties, is by and between County of San Bernardino, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as CTIY. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY are already contractually engaged in a program of weed abatement within the territorial limits of CITY, but in a program that does not provide for the control of weeds by the use of chemical means on City - owned rights -of -ways, and WHEREAS, these parties are agreed that COUNTY has provided, and shall continue to provide, services to CITY for abatement of weeds on CITY rights -of -way land by means of physical removal without the use of chemicals, all for which COUNTY shall be reimbursed by CITY under provisions of the agreement already now in effect, and WHEREAS, these parties desire to establish a second program for weed control on CITY's right -of -way lands by chemical and mechanical means, in a manner approved by County Agricultural Commissioner for land determined by the City Engineer, THEREFORE, it is agreed and covenanted by these parties as follows: I. COUNTY shall, by and through its Agricultural Commissioner: 1. Provide a spray truck, operator (and applicator when necessary), and appropriate chemicals to spray various areas of CITY -owned rights -of -way as designated by the City Engineer, the operation to be supervised by the County Agricultural Commissioner. 2. Perform respraying in the spring when and as determined necessary by both the City Engineer and the • 1, • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 af: J OWP 16 LLi�NU 17 '32iz 18 LL r >?LLK uta 19 �Wz 3w 20 ]n0 ° "a 21 W 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 PAG:vk 31 11 -28 -7932 33 34 35 36 b•Ifsts., n, County Agricultural Commissioner. 3. Provide application, rates and types of chemicals as determined by the County Agricultural Commissioner on the basis of objectives set by the City Engineer. 4. Provide a weekly report of activity, including labor, equipment, materials, and areas covered. 5. Provide a monthly billing based on the actual cost of the labor, including supervision and overhead, equip- ment and materials. 6. Notify the City Engineer if at anytime it is determined that the amount of the Purchase Order No. 00309, dated November 9, 1979, Account No. 01- 23 -27, of CITY, will be exceeded by costs to be billed. 7. Final determination of performance, that is, amount of equipment, materials or labor, to be provided by COUNTY shall be subject to approval of the County Agricultural Commissioner, who may make reductions in performance if any of such resources of COUNTY should be reserved in his judgment from further performance. II. CITY shall, by and through its City Engineer, or as appropriate, its Purchasing Agent: B. Compensate COUNTY for all its direct costs in performing the above duties. 9. Provide a purchase order in the amount of the estimated cost of the total program hereof. 10. Provide additional purchase orders when necessary to carry out its obligations hereunder. 11. Provide full cooperation to COUNTY in carrying out the provisions of this Agreement. III. 12. This Agreement shall be in effect for a period of five years, on a year -to -year basis, unless terminated earlier by either party upon written notice delivered prior to February 1, of the year of termination. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 aZ.< 16 17 o�mzd 18 c�s�z 19 20 21 N 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 PAG:vk 30 11 -29 -7391 32 33 34 35 36 M 13. Notice shall be sent as follows: City of Rancho Cucamonga 8076 Archibald Avenue Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: City Engineer County of San Bernardino 777 East Rialto Avenue San Bernardino, California 92415 Attention: Roger L. Birdsall Agricultural Commissioner ATTEST: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ANDRES DISHAROON, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors BY L. MAY LD, Chairman Dated: DEC 17 x119 d of Sup rvisors 77- -F7A- ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Dated: _3- l� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA MEMORANDUK Date: January 16, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Subject: PARCEL MAP NO. 5269 The subject Parcel Map was tentatively approved by the County on February 15, 1978 for 4 lots on 4.81 acres located on the north side of Hillside, east of Carnelian. The developer, H 6 S Properties, has proceeded with complying with the conditions of approval. They have submitted a letter of credit with an improvement agreement for street construction. Letter of Credit Performance $40,500.00 • Letter of Credit Labor 6 Material $40,500.00 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached Resolution approving the map and security offered by the developer. Respectfully submitted, LLOYD B. NBBS City Engineer LBH:nm l� l� AND DIVISION APPLICATION SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 X,6 1 1 � I 1 21 G� 1 1 - F- - - ---- 4' 393 I yip {�STe,F„IS�'orf.. of 0 i �\v v I e. P • I 01 r roEose ��— yP ?LiC,I`1T; );ane %%. ✓ ij9s; n Phone 9 &.J77- -!3 7/ F address S7!/ 5 il/�e �4 w') Z 411A (C / } r7 :i GA L(��a�t,i % {:Fj 7i.)�('r'M1nII 1!!r P•. "KSG� R. / /roll!r'...d Gum /(phone s -!T- , R i/ 1 i v SUIS (Office Use Only) FEE 3ECE IPT "O..S 7/ L i!^ N&L iclO .�jLt �r 1 U'. �\v v I e. P • I 01 r roEose ��— yP ?LiC,I`1T; );ane %%. ✓ ij9s; n Phone 9 &.J77- -!3 7/ F address S7!/ 5 il/�e �4 w') Z 411A (C / } r7 :i GA L(��a�t,i % {:Fj 7i.)�('r'M1nII 1!!r P•. "KSG� R. / /roll!r'...d Gum /(phone s -!T- , R i/ 1 i v SUIS (Office Use Only) FEE 3ECE IPT "O..S 7/ L i!^ N&L iclO .�jLt .• • RESOLUTION NO. 80 -5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5269, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 77 -0590) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 77 -0590, submitted by H 6 S Properties, and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the north aide of Hillside Road, met of Carnelian Street, being a division of a portion of Lot 6, Block 13, Cucamonga Homestead Association, was approved by the Planning Commission of San Bernardino County on February 15, 1978, as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 5269 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown ou said tentative parcel map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agree - ment submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows; ATTEST: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest tbereto; and 2. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 3. That said Parcel Map Number 5269 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk / /� • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: January 16, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: AGREEMENT - SEDWAY /COOKS Attached is the agreement between Sedway /Cooke and the City for the prepara- tion of the Industrial Specific Plan. The Council has seen this agreement once before but with the firm of John Blayney and Associates. As previously explained to the City Council, there is a change of consultants as a result of selection of Sedway /Cooke for the General Plan and because of the Industrial Committee's agreement with consistency in consulting firms. The only difference between this agreement and the one with John Blayney is some minor modifications that reflect Sedway/Cooke's consulting firm and a different work program from their proposal. Unless there are any questions about the project, Staff recom- mends that the City Council approve the agreement. Please note that the Chamber • of Commerce has already forwarded to the City the total sum necessary to accom- plish the contract, agreements have already been signed regarding the use of funds for the purposes stated in the contract, and again, although this is a Chamber contribution, there is concurrence by all parties involved that it is strictly a City controlled project which is to develop a City Industrial Specific Plan with input from the Chamber. 1 - Resp�ctEulJ,y submitted, JACK LAM, Director o£_.� Community Development JL:nm 15 INDUSTRIAL AREA PLAN PROJECT AGREEMENT This Agreement for professional services, dated and effective .tan. 16, 1980 , 19 is a contract between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City ", and Sedway /Cooke, a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as " Consultant". I. RECITALS A. Whereas, it has been determined that it is in the best interest of the City to retain the professional services of a consultant to assist in preparing the Industrial Area Plan, including an Action Program; the Plan Environmental Impact Report; and a Master Environmental Assessment; said work products hereinafter referred to as "Plan;" and B. Whereas, the City has approved the selection of Consultant to assume respon- sibility for performance of the work described in Appendix A: Scope of Work and Appendix B: Work Schedule attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, the same as if fully set forth, and hereinafter referred to as "Scope of Work" in accord with the terms and conditions set forth herein. • II. THEREFORE, CITY AND CONSULTANT AGREE AS FOLLOWS: AGREEMENT Consultant shall prepare, perform, and complete the following professional services which shall result in completion of Plan. A. Employment of Consultant. The City hereby agrees to engage the Consultant and the Consultant agrees to perform the tasks set forth herein for the City. B. Responsibility of the Consultant. The Consultant shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, timely completion, and the coordination of all reports and other services furnished by the Consultant under this agreement, except that the Consultant shall not be responsible for the accuracy of information supplied by the City. The Consultant shall, without additional compensa- tion, correct or revise any factual errors in his reports and other data; provided, that the Consultant shall be compensated for any corrections or revisions required by inaccuracies in information supplied by the City or its agents in the amount and by the method established by this Agreement. • 16 2. The Consultant shall perform such professional services as nay be neces- sary to accomplish the work required to be performed under this agree- ment, in accordance with this agreement. C. Responsibility of City. 1. The City shall be responsible for all liaison, coordination, and coimunica- tion with all city agencies, staff, officials, and current or previous con- sultants to the City including L.D. King, Inc. (drainage and flood protec- tion), DKS Associates (freeway access), etc., Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, as well as with other involved agencies of other levels and jurisdictions, including but not limited to San Bernardino County, the Southern California Association of Governments and the State of California. 2. Upon commencement of this agreement, the City, shall furnish the Consul- tant with all available data relevant to the Plan, particularly all technical data and information developed by Blayney and Associates. Furthermore, the City shall provide staff assistance in replacement or obtaining additional information from Blayney and Associates including questions raised by Sedway Cooke regarding data developed by Blayney and Associates. The City, through its engineering and planning staff shall actively assist the Consultant in determining the adequacy of the work products related to circulation including rail service, drainage and flood pro- tection, and utilities. • D. Scope of Work. The program to be performed by the Consultant is more par- ticularly described in Appendix A: Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, the same as if fully set forth, and hereinafter referred to as "Scope of Work". E. Changes. L. The City may, at any time, by written order, make changes within the general scope of this agreement in the services or work to be performed. If such changes cause an increase or decrease in the Consultant's coat of or time required for, performance of any services under this agreement shall be modified in writing accordingly and an equitable adjustment shall be nmde. Any claim of the Consultant for adjustment under this clause must be asserted in writing within 30 days from the date of receipt by the Consultant of the notification of change. All corres- pondence concerning contract changes will be through certified mail. 2. No services for which any additional compensation will be charged by the Consultant shall be furnished without the written authorization of the City. F. Termination. 1. The Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by either party in the event of substantial failure by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this agreement through no fault of the terminating party. 17 2. If termination is effected by the City, an equitable adjustment in the .. price provided for In this agreement shall be made. The City retains the right to terminate without cause. If the consultant is terminated by the City without cause, the consultant will be compensated only for the actual work performed to the date of termination. If the contract is terminated by the City for cause, any damages sustained by the City by reasons of consultant's breach will be recoverable. Should the consultant elect to terminate justifiably, it will be only compensated for services performed to the date of termination. All correspondence regarding termination will be addressed to the following locations: Consultant: Sedway /Cooke 325 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, California 94111 Attention Paul H. Sedway City: City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Jack Lam _ 3. Termination will be effective upon the giving of: a. Not less than ten (10) days written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) or intent to terminate, and b. An opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination. 4. Upon receipt of a termination action pursuant to paragraph (1) above, the • Consultant shall: a. Promptly discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise), and b. Deliver to the City all data, drawings, reports, summaries, and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by the Consultant in performing this agreement, whether completed or in progress. 5. Upon termination pursuant to paragraph (1) above, the City may take over the work and prosecute the some to completion by agreement with another party or otherwise. G. Payment. 1. The City agrees to pay the Consultant for all services nod materials rendered in the performance of the specified work scope a sum of not to exceed $43.000. Payment shall be made according to the following schedule; $6,000 payable at the end of each month to a maximum of six months, and $7,000 upon receipt of all work under this agreement including work copies and rough drafts of maps and texts. • 1� 2. Payment shall be made to the Consultant as soon as practicable, and in • any case within 30 days of invoicing. 3. All payment will be authorized after the Monthly Work Progress and Budget Management Report (MWPBM) has been received by the City (Section 0.3). 4. For those services requested by the City that go beyond the scope of said agreement, Consultant shall be entitled to time and materials compensation billable at the Consultant's standard billing rates. The billing rates of the Consultant shall be: Principals 55.00 per hour Senior Associates 35.00 per hour Associates 30.00 per hour Planners 25.00 per hour Graphic Designers 125.00 per hour Research Assistants $15.00 per hour H. Data and Services. 1. Except for information to be provided by the City, the Consultant shall provide all necessary professional and non - professional services, office space, equipment, supplies and other items of expense of whatever kind and nature required for the performance and completion of the program. 2. All information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing, avail- . able, owned by or in the possession of the City, and necessary for the carrying out of the work shall be furnished to the Consultant without charge by the City and the City shall cooperate with the Consultant in every way possible in carrying out the work. 3. All materials prepared by the Consultant in the course of the program shall be deemed to be the property of the City and shall be delivered upon final payment. 4. The Consultant agrees to attend formal presentation meetings with the City Council, Planning Commission, Chamber of Commerce Industrial Com- mittee, and city staff as may he reasonably necessary for the comple- tion of their services hereunder, provided that the total of such meetings shall not exceed five (5). Compensation for such above mentioned presentation meetings in excess of five (5) in number or such meetings held beyond six months from commencement shall be billable at the Con- sultant's standard billing rates and may exceed the maximum sum speci- fied in Section K. Consultant shall attend such other meetings as are appropriate and necessary to the effective completion of the contract, as mutually determined by Consultant and City. Gathering information from other city employed consultants will he part of this contract. Where practical, the City may authorize the distri- bution of materials and information between Consultants and facilitate the free flow of information where feasible. 1. Personnel. 0 I. The Consultant represents that he has, or will secure at his own expense, all personnel required in performing the services under his agreement. Such personnel shall not be employees of or have any contractual rela- tionship with the City. 2. All services required herein in this agreement will be performed by the Consultant or under its supervision, 3. The Consultant's project manager for this agreement shall be Fred Etzel, assisted by Y.T. Morikawa. J. Time of Performance. The program as described in Appendix A attached hereto, shall be completed within the time specified in Appendix 8 unless modified pursuant to Section K. K. Reports. The Consultant shall submit such memoranda, reports and maps os are required by the scope of work set forth in Appendix A in the form of one camera -ready original. L. Compensation for Additional Services. If any legal action is brought against the City in connection with the Plan which is the subject of this agreement, the City will assume the responsibility for contracting with the Consultant for testimony, if necessary, in defense of the Plan, in accordance with standard billing rates. Should the City be subject to a judgement of an appellate court • that the adopted Plan is inadequate and the City and the Consultant jointly determine, that said inadequacy is due to errors or omissions as a result of the Consultants work, the Consultant shall pay all legal fees and costs incurred by City. M. Liability. Consultant agrees to hold City harmless from any and all third party claims, including but not limited to wrongful death, bodily injury, property damage and any other claims of whatever nature arising out of the acts or omissions of Consultant, its employees or subcontractors, in the performance of this Agreement. N, Assignability. The Consultant shall not assign any of Consultant's rights or obligations under this Agreement without prior written consent of the City thereto; provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due to the Consultant from the City under this agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval. Written notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to the City. M o. Findings Confidential. Any reports, information, data, etc., given to or • prepared or assembled by the Consultant under this agreement which the City requests to be kept as confidential shall not be made available to any individual or organization by the Consultant without prior written approval of the City. P. Proiect Monitoring. The total approach utilized by Consultant shall bring, together its vast resources of experience and knowledge; it shall promote efficiency in project performance and coordination and offer effective management. I. Purpose of Work Program - The purpose of the Work Program described in Scope of Work, Appendix A attached, shall be: a. To provide for a uniquely close working relationship between Consul- tant and City, enabling effective monitoring of the total work effort. b. To provide an iterative process for carrying out the technical work from the general initial phases to the more detailed final phases. c. To provide a reiterative review process through which the tasks, findings and recommendations, and work products of Consultant can be closely reviewed by City and tangible decisions can be reached at the conclusion of each work effort. d. To facilitate decisions relating to key issues early in the work effort. • Important decisions can be made by City on critical issues which require immediate attention, without having to wait until the con- clusion of the entire project. e. To provide the private sector with essential technical base data, including environmental information, early in the work effort as it becomes available. f. To design a Work Program so that it may be terminated at the conclusion of any phase and still provide valuable data. 2. Scheduling Standards - Consultant will prepare and adapt standards of cost and time requirements for each work task and its component subtasks in the preparation and completion of the Plan. The Detailed Work Program, revised in accordance with subtask I.e. and including the Master Work Progress and Budget Management Schedule, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to any further work or research being conducted on Plan. 3. Monthly Work Progress and Budget Management (MWPBM) Report - Each month Consultant shall use the Master Work Progress and Budget Manage- ment Schedule to generate a monthly report which shall consist of the following: 41 a. Monthly updated project manager's sheet. b. Monthly updated project progress schedule. . c. Monthly updated project budget management chart. 4. Documentation System - A documentation system will be set up by Con- sultant. The following four elements shall form the basis of the system: a. Correspondence: A number system shall be set up to cover any correspondence between any two entities on the project, sequentially numbered in chronological order. For instance, the first correspon- dence from,Consultant to City on this project would be IP /SC -RC -I. Correspondence from the City to the Consultant would be IP /RC- SC -I, with IP meaning Industrial Plan, RC meaning Rancho Cuco- mongo, and SC meaning Sedway /Cooke. This system shall cover all letters, telexes and memoranda. If telephone conversations were considered significant enough to be retained in files, they would be confirmed by telexes and thus enter the system. All correspondence shall reference the topic discussed at least to the detail of the element in question with regard to the Detailed Work Program. b. Conference /Meeting Notes: Such notes shall be numbered and follow IS a standard format that will enable their relevance to detailed acti- vities of the Work Program to be readily ascertained. c. Data Collection and Analysis: The data collected and analysis asso- dated with each activity of the Detailed Work Program shall be numbered with that activity number, and otherwise kept in good order by the particular individual or subcontractor assigned for each activity. The conclusions, analysis and data for each activity will form a separate package in the final set of documentation as discussed hereinbelow. d. Management Reporting: All items prepared by Consultant in support of its management role will form a separate set of documents. The following elements are envisioned at this time: I. Detailed cost budget and work program. 2. Master Work Progress and Budget Management Reports (Monthly updated project manager's sheets, monthly updated progress schedules, monthly updated project budget management charts). C�� It The Documentation System will be finalized by Consultant at the • completion of Plan and after adoption by City such that it will satisfy the needs of the City without undue procedural hardship on any one party. e. Technical Data Synthesis: After collection and evaluation of all available technical data, consultant shall submit said information to City, describing the source of data collected and identifying why .. .. certain specific data was selected for use over other data pertaining to the same subject matter. Consultant shall also identify and list major data gaps and indicate for each identified gap its implications upon overall scheduling requirements. Q. Equal Employment Opportunity. The Consultant is an Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action emp� -and agrees to comply with applicable re- quirements governing equal employment opportunities. R. Inspection. The City, in reference To any request for payment submitted by Consultant for services under this Agreement, shall have the right to request and examine additionwl records from the Consultant To substantiate such payment. S. Authority. Each of the parties to this Agreement represents that the person signing on behalf of wch party has the authority to do so. T. Relationship of Parties It is understood that the contractual relationship of . the Consultant }o the C ity is that of an independent contractor, and all persons working for or under the direction of the Consultants are their agents, servants, and employees, and not agents, servants, or employees of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth herein. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE Mayor Approved as to form and content ATTEST: City Attorney City Clerk Paul H. Sedway, President Sedway /Cooke a3 8 APPENDIX A SCOPE OF WORK Conceptual Approach to Work Program • Products Work Program Task I Liaison and Coordination Task 2 Planning Analysis Task 3 Framework for Development Task 4 Interim Guide for Project Evaluation Task 5 Formulation of Alternatives and on Industrial Area Plan Task 6 Preparation of the Industrial Area Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Report Task 7 Additional Services APPENDIX B WORK SCHEDULE • • APPENDIX A SCOPE OF WORK CONCEPTUAL APPROACH TO WORK PROGRAM Planning Inventory; Analysis Input from Previous Work Interim Development Master Guide Framework Environmental Alternative) IAltennativel IAlternative� No -Plan 1 2 3 Scenario Industrial _. _ �f Proposed Area Plan �� Action Impact Assessment Action Mitigation Program Measures C�5 to PRODUCTS E Major products of the Work Program will be geared to the needs of the City and will include the following. Master Environmental Assessment (MEA), an inventory and data base which identifies the environmental characteristics and constraints of the Industrial Area and can be used to influence the design and locations of individual projects —see State EIR Guidelines, Chapter 3, Section 15069.6. This document will also be used for preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Industrial Area Plan and as reference for individual project EIR's in the Industrial Area. The MEA will be compiled during early stages of the Work Program and will draw relevant technical data from the General Plan process. The MEA will be produced at the time of Industrial Area Plan /Draft EIR submission. Industrial Area Plan consisting of concept description, land use, circulation, drainage and load protection, public services and utilities, and urban design plans, and an action program for implementation and management of the Plan, including industrial securities and energy efficient development guidelines in diagram, map and textual forms. Details of the major Plan elements are: Land Use Uses Permitted - Performance Standards - Employment Densities - Land Ownership Patterns - Land Usage Patterns 0 Cul ircation (including fixed -rail) - Traffic Service and Capacity - Route Continuity . - Appearance - Ease of Implementation - Compatibility with Drainage and Flood Control Requirements Drainage and Flood Protection - Drainage Patterns - Runoff and Disposal - Typical Design and Flood Hazard Protection Standards - Right -of -Way Easements - Method of Maintenance Public Services and Utilities ervice Capacity Location - Availability and Condition Easements Extension /connection approvals and procedures • 4 0 and include such services and utilities as water, sewage collection and . treatment, solid waste disposal, electrical, natural gas, fire protection and policy protection. • Urban Design Circulation (trails, bicycle, pedestrian, etc.) - Conservation and Open Space (used versus viewed open space, productive — - - - - -- versus protective open space, etc.) - Streetscope and overall design elements (setbacks, including prototype site usage and design), landscape (site, parkways, and medians including list of plant materials and retainment of significant vegetation), gate- ways, lighting, fencing and walls, community graphics, signing and street furniture, and general recommendations on approaches to maintenance. - Architectural guidelines (general design provisions which will add to the overall theme and visual appearance of the City) Urban design guidelines will cover both private and public improvements. Action Pro�raamm Master Plan and Site Plan review requirements General Standards for Review of Master Plan and Site Plays - Procedures for Review - Recommendations for Zoning Amendments - Potential Financing Sources - Phasing and unit cost estimates Draft Environmental Impost Report (Draft EIR), to be prepared in compliance with the CEOA requirements for the In usirl Area I lon. In addition, the consultant shall submit to the City a minimum of tw molar reproducible mops at the scale of 1" -500' or 1"600', illustrating guidelines for development. If appropriate, the above three products will be documented in one report entitled "Industrial Area Plan /Draft EIR." C 7 (1/ WORK PROGRAM TASK 1 - LIAISON AND COORDINATION a. Hold work session with the City staff to gain better understanding of the - status of infrastructure and other planned public improvements. b. Contact developers with immediate development plans. Based on the general information obtained on October 29, 1979 regarding the private plans for development, interview property owners, industrialists, developers and their consultants, to collect detailed information including the proposed land use development program (both short -term and long- term), proformas for develop- ment if available, site plans and architectural drawings, and schedules for construction and operation. c. Assess general community interests and needs through participation in the General Plan Citizen Advisory Committee meetings. Such meetings shall not be considered formal presentations as stated in paragraph 110). d. Meeting with the Industrial Committee of the Chamber of Commerce to present work products and gain inputs at key junctures in the planning process. This will be closely coordinated with the schedule of the General Plan program. e. Revise and update work program as necessary. TASK 2 - PLANNING ANALYSIS a. Collect and analyze data gathered and work done by the Phase I consultants; collect additional data as required to facilitiote up- to-date understanding of the context of planning. The work done to date (by Blayney - Dyett), Industrial Area development assumptions used for traffic modeling (by Blayney-Dyett and DKS Associates), the drainage and flood hazard reports (by LD King), and other pertinent materials (such as plans for power transmission lines) will be examined, highlighting problem areas. b. Review industrial development potentials in the City of Rancho Cucamonga through analysis of existing documents. c. Conduct on -site survey of the Industrial Area to assess aesthetic assets and deficiencies. TASK 3 - FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPMENT a. Research factors and characteristics associated with the types of development which may be included in the Plan. The research will be accomplished through Cx U (� 0 0 • interviews with industrial development experts and analysis of technical docu- • ments. The factors will include location and land size, access (vehicular, rail, air), service, labor force, special site preparation, and other support requirements. The characteristics will include site coverage, building scale, energy consumption pattern, impact variables and others. lJ b. Prepare o composite mop(s) summarizing areas of constraints and opportuni- ties. This will include consideration of land use relationships, natural resources and hazards, topography and subsurface conditions, limitations on vehicular and rail access and service, visual resources to be protected, wind direction, etc. A counterpart analysis will also be prepared to determine the suitability range of buildable portions of the land, based upon consideration of the ease of providing access, water and sewer service, and other localized conditions. c. Based on the findings from Tasks I, 2 and above, prepare a list of goals and objectives for the Industrial Area development and a preliminary list of per- formance standards or criteria for development. d. Prepare a Master Environmental Assessment (MEA), that is a compilation of the inventory data base and definition of constraints and opportunities areas, constituting the environmental setting of the Industrial Area. This document will be used for preparation of the Draft EIR for the Industrial Area Plan and as reference for individual project EIR's in the Industrial Area. The MEA will be put together once all necessary and required existing information is obtained. TASK 4 - INTERIM GUIDE FOR PROJECT EVALUATION Since it is the policy of Rancho Cucamonga to process high priority development applications while the Industrial Area Plan is being formulated, the Consultant will assist the City in evaluating projects which have applied to the City for the necessary permits and approvals. Project evaluation will be based on the findings of Tasks I, 2 and 3 and identification of strategies to mitigate adverse effects. TASK 5 - FORMULATION OF ALTERNATIVES AND AN INDUSTRIAL AREA PLAN a. Identify a range of overall plan concepts, focusing on the options available with regard to land use mix, density and functional relationships (both internally within the Industrial Area and city - wide), access and circulation system (inciudiig street extensions and abandonment, interchange locations, right -of -way, curbcuts locations, etc.), drainage system, urban design for visual and environmental enhancement, and other improvements. • �� 14 1 b. Combine the concepts and options identified above, to formulate up to three • alternative sketch plans for the Industrial Area. One of the alternatives will be a baseline projection of "no -plan scenario ", documenting what might be likely to happen if no Industrial Area Plan was adopted as public policy. This scenario will serve as a basis for comparative assessment of impacts asso- ciated with each alternative. c. Refine the preliminary list of performance standards or evaluation criteria developed in Task 3. The list will include: relationships to city -wide and local goals and objectives; technical feasibility; fiscal feasibility; socioeconomic impacts; environmental impacts; aesthetic impacts; and community values. d. Present sketch plan alternatives at a joint meeting of City staff, the Industrial Committee of the Chamber of Commerce and, if appropriate, the General Plan Citizens Advisory Committee. Discuss evaluation of the alternatives according to the above set of criteria. Select one alternative if possible. TASK 6 - PREPARATION OF INDUSTRIAL AREA PLAN AND DRAFT EIR a. Prepare a set of guidelines and stondards for development and management of the Industrial Area. This task will involve recycling and refinement of the alternatives and options for the Plan elements. The Industrial Area Pion will represent a long -term goal of the Industrial Area. The products of this subtask will relate to location of land use, circulation, drainage and flood protection, • public services and utilities. b. Prepare a set of specific design guidelines, for both private and public improve- ments including roadway design concepts, drainage and flood protection design concepts, landscape design, signoge, etc. This subtask will be undertaken concurrently with impact assessment and identification of mitigation mea- sures, and its products will constitute the urban design section of the Industrial Area Plan. c. Assess priorities for development phasing and overall action program including zoning amendments if necessary; estimate approximate public improvement costs based on unit costs to be determined jointly with the City; formulate mechanisms for implementation and management of the Industrial Area Plan. These may include potential financing sources (such as establishment of an assessment district other than the one currently being proposed by the City, etc.) for the development of public amenities and services, strategies for cooperative joint development, and procedures for project review and evaluation. The products of this subtask will constitute the action program of the Industrial Area Plan. d. Prepare Draft Environmental Impact Report in compliance with the CEOA provisions. A preliminary draft copy of the Industrial Area Plan and EIR will be submitted to the City for review prior to final submission. Upon completion of the Draft EIR, City shall file the notice of completion with the Secretary of the Resources Agency and shall publish such notice in the Daily Report • 36 15 Newspaper. In addition, City shall transmit said notice and the required • number of Draft EIR's to the State Clearinghouse. City shall also transmit such notice and copies of the Draft EIR to local and regional agencies. The City shall provide a list of local and regional agencies which are to receive the Draft EIR. e. Present the Industrial Area Plan and major impacts at a joint meeting of the City staff, the Industrial Committee of the Chamber of Commerce, the General Plan Citizen Advisory Committee, and others as appropriate. TASK 7 - ADDITIONAL SERVICES The Consultant is prepared to undertake additional tasks on a time - and - expense basis, including Preparation of Final EIR, publication of a brochure entitled "Prospectus for Industrial Development in Rancho Cucamonga," schematic design services for parkway demonstration program, etc. • APPENDIX 8 Task 1 Liaison Task 2 P anning Analysis Task 3 DeveTopment Framework Task 4 Interim Guide Task 5 A ternotives Task 6 Tn %Droft EIR Task 7 Additional Services ASSESSMENT DISTRICT EIR GENERAL PLAN WORK SCHEDULE 1980 Start 1 2 3 Months 4 5 6 7 8 9• 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Keys: © Presentation to City, the Chamber of Commerce Industrial Committee, and, if appropriate, the General Plan Citizens Advisory Committee: City Council and Planning Commission. ---jInput/ In terocti on. • unrsss Additional Services. 3C I} M NM Wrap .eeeve TN. uee—fw Reedeeerpr. Ontp aetr 1PIPPILICATION FOR ALCONOUC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 1215 O Street Sacramento, Calif. 95811 SAN BOHARM -10- Im..n1...evxa ..nnoxr The undersigned hereby applies for Roemer described or follows: 1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO. OI SAL3 1191 Applied under Sec. fgA011 ❑ Effective Date: 1 /�� FEE NO. GEOGRAPHICAL CODE 361 is Date Issued 2. NAMES) OF APPLICANT(S) Temp. Permit 1 Effective Dote: FORD# 018= Ts, 3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTIONS) FEE LIC, TYPE Nnl4 $ 200.00 40 ANIMAL 184.80 yy T}6 °�faBusiness S. location of Business— Number and Sneet 11837 Foothill Blvde Ci and Zip Code Coun Iancno Cucamonga 91730 SAtd ryBDNO. RECEIPT NO. TOTAL $ 384.80 6. If Premises Licensed, /. tiro ris mises msme Y09 Show Type of License 41 City limits? 8. Moiling Address (if different from 5)— Number and Street I "I w Y SS 9. Have you ever been convicted of a lelony? �1 . Have you ern violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic l r beverage Control Act or regulations of the Deportment per. taining to the Act? '� %'N ' _ i 11. Explain o "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an attachment which shall be deemed part W this applicohon. ."Dj>1 pray —Minor 12. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in onaale "tense' premises wn1 nave ml me quolm..rmm oI a ricer e, arrr. (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit robe violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. ssio, ee p . 13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of `� ^N D SL 1.rd _ .......... Date .., ,12/.1. ,%9_ UM« .11, N grii r.rh e«ren nb« uy,« uP—,. bdea, —66. and xpr It) N. is IM •Nu..., « nr N IN ueelit.nn, e n .. «u Mrt« N M. W,I—I twprarien, mmN i 'I. Iw seine .pgkai -. duh euM«IM I. —h. MLL 9milmrien on Ib NIN", (2) IN, b N, r rod IN 1 «r pine uryliee i.n .W IMw rh. rmlr Ilr.r.el and IN. ..1, and .II N IM rM1nm.nl, IMnin —& In. m, al IMI . p«an el Mr rMn Ih..Wh-nI .r pp @anb rW. an, dir«I In indirwl in ,N .,ii « epplywrlY bMn.n 1. M nMua.d a IN I..(,) I. wMd Ihi. W Wkw:an is medy is) IMI IM Fends NO. wr r "'.«d ,I....W i, mWI . «tidr Ih...... ei . I— « I. IAell .n ryrnm.nl en. inr. m.r. 1Nn ni,r.M1 (re) d.p ...dine IN Mr m nbkh�IN nend.r .pplimr:an a I61W vilh IN '.par m.n w .pin w nbbloh a 10.twn. I. w fr .m 11". d n.ml.rer .r 1. Masud w ini«. me Inns..) wmlow; In IMI IN Innd« .111-11. m.1 IM nitinli or .1041 IM .p"'In" . M. Ikm.w wilh m mrAiM MMlm, M1 M. a.y.lm.nl. I \ U. APPLICANT Do Not Write Beim This Line; For Department Use Only �ched: ❑ Recorded moiee, ❑ Fiduciary pope., In /�rn ❑ ...... .... ... .......... .... .... . ... .... ............... ...... ............... .........._..COPIES MAILED .... ........._................._...................._--------- leroeel `: ❑ Retmwal: Fee of ................Paid at ., .__ .......................... .- on .. ........................Receipt No. ................... ........ _...__ Aea au uno � p °rm. E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: January 16, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: CONTINUED ITEM - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 79 -05 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An Ordinance establishing standards and review procedures for Planned Community Developments ABSTRACT: As the City Council will recall, at the December 19th meeting, the Planned Community Ordinance was referred back to the Planning Commission for their approval of the change in language on Section 4G and the language change regarding Commissions' consideration rather than approval of the development plan and text, and the Councils' approval of the development plan and text. Attached, please find a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report and the corrected Ordinance. • RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 79 -05. Respdctfully submitted, ,J JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:BKH: nm 31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 09, 1980 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 79 -05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An Ordinance establishing standards and review procedures for Planned Community Devleopment ABSTRACT At the December 19 meeting of the City Council a question was raised as to the wording of Section 4G regarding dedication of other forms of access. Additionally, a question was raised as to the wording regarding Planning Commission approval and City Council approval of plans. We have made the appropriate changes in the Ordinance attached. Specifically Section 2 B (1) Section 4G, Section 4K have been ammended clarifying the language. The primary concern of the City Council was Section 4G. • As the Commission will recall when this item was before you there was some question as to whether or not other means of access could receive consideration for dedication and count towards meeting the requirements of open space or park dedication require- ments. At the time of the meeting a word change was made which, at closer review, did not really clarify the intent. The sentence has been reworded as follows: Consideration of other forms of access such as pedestrian ways, courts, plazas, driveways, horse trails, bike trails, or open parking lots offered for dedication may be made at the time of approval of the Development Plan and Text as a means of meeting requirements for open space or park dedication requirements. If the changes made coincide with the Commission's interpretation we recommend that the Commission recommend approval of the changes in the Planned Community Ordinance to the City Council. spectivel4 Submitted, Jack Lam Director of Community Development JL: cd Attachment: Ordinance 094 4 V ITEM "E" \J P. C,. .. w ORDINANCE NO. 94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMEND- MENT NO. 79 -05 ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Purposes: A. The Planned Community Zone is included in the Zoning regulations to achieve the following purposes. 1. To promote and protect the public health, safety, and welfare. 2. To implement the objectives and policies of the General Plan. 3. To safeguard and enhance environmental amenities and the quality of development. . 4. To attain the physical, social, and economic advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly planned use of land resources. 5. To lessen congestion and assure convenience of access; to secure safety from fire, flood, and other dangers; to provide for adequate light, air, sunlight, and open space; to promote and encourage conservation of scarce resources; to prevent overcrowding of land and undue concentration of population; to facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive, and harmonious community; to attain a desirable balance of residential and employment opportunities; and to expedite the provision of adequate and essential public services. 6. To facilitate development within the City in accordance with the General Plan by permitting greater flexibility and encouraging more creative and imaginative designs for major urban development projects subject to large - scale community planning. 7. To promote more .economical and efficient use of the land while providing a harmonious variety of housing choices and commercial and industrial activities, a high level of urban amenities, and preservation of natural and scenic qualities of open space. • ,,.inance No. 94 Page 2 B. To provide a process for initiation, review, and • regulation of large -scale comprehensively planned urban communities that affords the maximum flexibility to the developer within the context of an overall development program and specific, phased development plans coordinated with the provision of necessary public services and facilities. SECTION 2: General Requirements A. A Planned Community Zone shall include a minimum area of 300 contiguous acres, under single ownership or otherwise subject to unified planning, construction, and development by a person, corporation, or other entity; property owned by public utilities, local districts or local governments will not be counted toward the 300 acre minimum, but may be used as a connector of single ownership. B. A Planned Community Zone shall be established upon application of a property owner, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Section 61.0221 of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and subject to the following provisions: 1. Submission of a Development Plan for consideration by the Planning Commission and approval of the City Council, . pursuant to this ordinance. 2. Determination by the Council that the establishment of the zone and approval of the Development Plan shall: a. Provide for the development of a comprehensively - planned urban community within the zone that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations. b. Provide for development within the zone in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. C, Provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development with the zone. SECTION 3: Use Regulations A. Allowable uses in each Planned Community Zone shall be as established by a Development Plan Text approved by the City Council. The Development Plan Text may incorporate uses by reference to specific base zone provisions, or may • establish specific use lists with definitions pertaining thereto. Ordinance No. 94 Page 3 • B. Existing uses within the Planned Community Zone at the time of its establishment shall be deemed allowable and incorporated in the Development Plan, unless terminated discontinued, or changed pursuant to a specific time schedule incorporated in the Development Plan Text. C. Unless otherwise provided by the Development Plan Text, public utility facilities and publicly -awned facilities shall be allowable subject to a Conditional Use Permit. D. Unless otherwise provided by the Development Plan Text, accessory uses or facilities shall be subject to the same use regulation provisions as the principal use or facility. E. Unless specified as subject to a Conditional Use Permit, each allowable use in the Planned Community Zone shall be subject to Director Review. F. Home Occupations pursuant to Ordinance No. 72 shall be allowable in each Planned Community. SECTION 4: Site Development Regulations and Performance Standards A. Planned Community Zone and all uses therein shall be • designed and developed in a manner compatible with and complementary to existing and potential development in the general vicinity of the zone. Site planning on the perimeter shall provide for the mutual protection of the zone and surrounding property from potential adverse influences. B. There shall be no minimum area, width, or depth requirement for individual lots, except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Director Review or by Location and Development Plan. C. There shall be no minimum yard requirement for individual lots except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan, or by Director Review. D. There shall be no minimum usable open space requirement for individual lots, except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan or by Director Review. E. There shall be no maximum height or coverage requirement for individual lots, except as established by a Development Plan, a Specific Plan, Community Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Location • and Development Plan or by Director Review. MA Ordinance No. 94 Page 4 The maximum number of dwelling units within a Planned • Community Zone shall not exceed the number of units indicated by the General Plan for property within the zone designated for residential use by the General Plan, provided that the distribution of units within the zone and the maximum or minimum residential density on any individual site or within designated portions of the zone shall be governed by the Development Plan, Location and Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, or Director Review approval pursuant to the Development Plan. G. All public streets within or abutting the development shall be dedicated and improved to City specifications for that particular classification of street. Private streets within the development shall be permanently reserved and maintained for their intended propose by means acceptable to and enforceable by the City. Consideration of other forms of access, such as pedestrian ways, courts, plazas, driveways, horse trails, bike trails, or open parking lots offered for dedication may be made at the time of the Develop- ment Plan and Text consideration as a means of meeting requirements for open space or park dedication requirements. N. All development within a Planned Community Zone shall relate harmoniously to the topography of the site, shall make suitable provision for the preservation of water courses, drainage areas, wooded areas, rough terrain, and similar natural features, • and shall otherwise be so designed inasmuch as possible, to use and retain natural features and amenities to the best advantage. Mechanical and electrical equipment, including air conditioners, antennas, pumps, heating or cooling or ventilating equipment, exterior lighting, or similar equipment shall be located and operated in a manner so as not to unreasonably disturb the peace, quiet, and comfort of neighboring residents. Excluding roof - mounted solar collector panels and decorative exterior lighting, all such equipment and devices shall be screened from view from any abutting street, and shall not be located in a street yard. J. All areas for storage of maintenance equipment, and all service areas including refuse storage and collection facilities, shall be enclosed by a fence, wall, or landscape screen. K. All uses within a Planned Conunity Zone shall provide off - street parking and loading facilities pursuant to 61.0219(b) of the San Bernardino County Code as adooted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The applicant may apply for and receive administrative relief from Section 61,0219(b) at the time of Development Plan Tentative consideration by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council whan verified proof has been submitted through specific examples of existing projects and /or expert testimony that supports reduced parking standards or stalls. • Ordinance No. 94 Page 5 • L. The proposed means for assuring continuing existence, maintenance and operation of the various common elements and facilities. M. Additional site development regulations and performance standards applicable to individual uses or to designated portions of a Planned Community Zone may be established by the Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan, or Director Review approval pursuant to the Development Plan. SECTION 5: Pre - Application Procedure A. Prior to submitting an application for a Planned Community Zone, the applicant or prospective developer should hold preliminary consultations with the Director of Community Development and other City officials to obtain information and guidance before entering into binding commitments incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data. Such preliminary consultations should be relative to a conceptual development plans which includes, but is not limited to, the following: 1. Proposed land uses to be developed within the zone. 2. Development concepts to be employed. • 3. Schematic maps, illustrative material, and narrative sufficient to describe the general relationships between land uses, and the intended desgin character and scale of principal features. 4. A preliminary time schedule for development, including quantitative data, such as population, housing units, land use acreage, and other data sufficient to illustrate phasing of development and potential impact on public service requirements. D. Following initial preliminary consultations pursuant to this section, the Director may require submission of a competently prepared housing market analysis, demonstrating the need for housing by price range and number of dwelling units. Such analysis may be requested as a part of the pre - application review procedure, may be made a requirement for submission of an application for a Planned Community Zone or may be requested as part of the environmental assessment or EIR. C. Followinq initial preliminary consultations pursuant to this section, the Director may require submission of a competently prepared commercial market analysis for any proposed shopping center of major commercial uses, showing • the need for such uses in the location requested and the inadequacy of existing zoned sites to meet this need. The market analysis shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Ordinance No. 94 Page 6 1. Determination of potential trade area. 2. Estimates of existing and future population of the trade area. 3. Determination of existing and potential effective buying power in the trade area. 4. Determination of the net potential customer buying power for the proposed commercial development. Such analysis may be requested as a part of the pre - application review procedure, or may be made a requirement for submission of an application for a Planned Community zone, or may be requested as part of the environmental assessment or EIR. D. Following initial preliminary consultation pursuant to this section, the Director may require presentation of the conceptual development plan to the Planning Commission. Such presentation shall be for information purposes only, and shall be in addition to subsequent public review requirements pursuant to an application for a Planned Community Zone and submission of Development Plan. SECTION 6: Development Plan A. The Development Plan to be submitted with an application for a Planned Community Zone shall include the following: 1. A boundary survey map of the property and a calculation of the gross land area within the proposed zone. A tentative subdivision map may be substituted if the applicant proposes to subdivide the property. 2. A topographic map and general grading concept plan with specific sections for sensitive areas, as determined by the Grading Committee for the property and adjacent land within 100 feet of the property, shown at contour intervals not to exceed 2 feet for natural slopes over 2" or less. For natural slopes over 2 contour interval shall not exceed S feet. 3. Maps and supporting tabulations shooing the current General Plan land use designation, the current zoning classification, and the current land use within the proposed zone and on adjacent sites within 300 feet. The location of structures and other significant improvements shall be shown. 4. A land use plan identifying areas within the proposed zone and uses to be developed therein, suoported by proposed or projected acreage, population, housing units, employment, and such related lanniny a d development data as the Djr�egtor of �or,munrt ?y �eveloprient may require. r 1 ►J • • Ordinance No. 94 Page 7 • 5. A development plan indicating the general phasing or anticipated schedule, indicating the total phasing of the Planned Community and areas to be developed in phases and the anticipated time schedule for beginning of construction and for completion of each phase of development including a pro rata share of amenities, parks and open space. This is a generalized schedule and may be adjusted according to market constraints as the Community develops. 6. A circulation plan, showing existing and proposed public and private streets, pedestrianways, trials, and related transportation access or circulation features required to serve the proposed development. The circulation plan shall be supported by schematic designs of principal traffic and circulation improvements, and such traffic engineering data :s required by the director to demonstrate that existing and proposed facilities, both within and outside the zone, shall be adequate to serve land uses proposed by the Development Plan. 7. A preliminary report and overall plan describing anticipated requirements and proposed means of • providing utility facilities and public services, including but not limited to, storm drainage, sewage disposal, water supply, parks and recreation, and school facilities. 8. An accompanying Development Plan Text setting forth the basic land use regulations, site development regulations and performance standards designed to govern each use area identified by the land use plan. The text need not incorporate the same level of detail as found in the regulations for base zones, but shall be as comprehensive as necessary to establish basic provisions and regulations which shall govern subsequent approval of specific tracts or developments within the Planned Community Zone. The text shall include, but not be limited to, the following provisions: a. A listing of allowable uses within each use area, including such qualifying descriptions or definitions and requirements for Conditional Use Permits as* may be applicable. b. Maximum and minimum regulations, as appropriate governing residential density, site coverage, • lot size and dimensions, yard requirements, usable open space, landscaping, and performance standards. 4 Ordinance No. 94 Page 8 Required yards, landscaping or other site development regulations to be applicable adjacent to other zones at the perimeter of the Planned Community Zone. Supplemental illustrations as required, establishing the basic architectural character and community environmental character and community environmental design qualities to be attained throughout the Planned Community Zone and within particular portions of the zone. 9. Such other information, such as a topographic model in areas of excessive slope, may be required by the - Director of Community Development, the Planning Commission, or the City Council to permit complete analysis and appraisal of the development, and to facilitate adoption of the Planned Community Zone and the Development Plan by the City Council. SECTION 7: Adoption of Zone and Development Plan A, An application for a Planned Community Zone and the Development Plan submitted with the application shall be subject to review and approval in the same manner as prescribed in Section 61.0221 of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamogna. B, Each Planned Community Zone established shall be indicated on the Zoning Map by the letter "PC" followed by a reference number identifying each separate zone. The Development Plan as modified and approved by the City Council, shall be considered to be a part of this ordinance,and shall be identified by reference to the corresponding designation of each specific Planned Community Zone on the Zoning Map. SECTION 8: Amendments to Development Plan A. A Development Plan may be amended in the same manner as provided by Section 61.0221 of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a change of zone boundaries or for a change in the regulations applicable with a zone. Amendment of a Development Plan shall be subject to the same findings as prescribed for initial enactment of a Planned Community Zone and adoption of the Development Plan applicable to the Planned Community Zone. An =mer-'nent t0 a Development Plan may he initiated by the City Planninq Corm..sion or the Council, or may be initiated by the original applicant for the Planned Cor.riunity Zone or a successor thereto, provided such applicant, nr successor has, at the tine of application for an amendment, a continuinq controllinq . interest in development or management of uses within the Planned Community Zone, l /� • • • • `J • Ordinance No. 94 Paae 9 SECTION 9: Review of Development Progress A. The Director of Community Development shall review each Planned Community Zone annually, and shall submit a report to the Planning Commission and City Council containing the following: 1. A summary of the development status within the zone and an assessment of progress during the year toward completion of development authorized by the Development Plan including adherence to development schedules and phasing. 2. A statement of any changes in land use and economic development trends, housing market indicators, commercial and industrial development rates, or programs for provision of public facilities and services which, in the opinion of the Director, vary significantly from those upon which the Development Plan were based, and which could affect adversely continued progress toward completion of development within the zone. B. A copy of the annual report of the Director shall be provided to the applicant and to such other interested parties or successors as deemed appropriate by the Director. Section 10: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of ,1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City C er—T k ' yor • ORDINANCE NO. 45B AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING ORDINANCE No. 45 PERTAINING TO INTERIM ZONING FOR ADULT BUSINESSES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that there has been inadequate time for the Planning Commission to complete studies concerning appropriate regulations for adult businesses, and that the term of Ordinance No. 45 should be extended. SECTION 2: Section 5 of Ordinance No. 45, as amended by Ordinance No. 45A, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, is hereby amended to read as follows: "SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall remain in effect until August 1, 1980, and during such period, all ordinances inconsistent with the • provisions hereof shall-be sus- pended and superseded by this Ordinance.". SECTION 3: The City Council does hereby find and declare that this Ordinance is for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and it shall take effect immediately upon its adoption as an urgency ordinance. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk s all attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in tFieC, ity of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 19 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • Mayor ATTEST: �� • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 1980 TO: City Council 8 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: DISCONTINUATION OF COUNTY ROAD MAINTENANCE CONTRACT At the time of execution of the 1979 -80 County Contract for Road Maintenance, staff indicated that we were not in a position to fully evaluate the cost effectiveness of the County operation in relation to other contract options. It was recommended that the Council approve the contract and direct staff to make an analysis of maintenance options. Council also authorized RJA Maintenance Contractor, Inc. to conduct a Contract Management Analysis at no cost to the City. Both RJA and staff have completed their analysis and concur in a recommendation to discontinue the County Maintenance Contract and replace these services with a combination of City crews and private contract services. Enclosed for Council review is a copy of the RJA report. This report is • included in its entirety as a courtesy to the Consultant. Staff does, however, disagree with certain findings of the report. The major purpose of the staff investigation was to compare County mainten- ance costs to the alternative of City and private contract maintenance. To accomplish this task, a work program was developed and compared under each alternative. A summary of this analysis was included in Appendix C, page C -3 of the RJA report. A revised version of this comparison is attached as Exhibit "A ". The basic conclusion of the study indicates that routine miscellaneous, labor intensive services, such as sign repair, patching and debris clean -up exclusive of administration costs can be performed equally well by the City or the County. These services could not be economically contracted. Larger items of work which can he easily defined in terms of scope and results, and can be programmed in advance in economic units, could effectively be con- tracted with specialty firms. These items include: pavement repair and resurfacing Shoulder grading Tree trimming Curb and sidewalk repair Storm and mechanical clean -up Statt analysis of these items indicate that in some cases these items are • being accomplished by the County at a lesser cost than by private contracting and that exclusive of administrative costs are competitive. FAI Discontinuation of Maintenance Contract Page 2 January 16, 1980 Staff analysis indicates that in actual work cost and production that a combination of City and contract services may be slightly more cast effective than current County service, but that the difference in this area is not conclusive. The major economic differences appear in the Maintnenace Manage- ment and Administration costs. It is in the estimate of these costs, that the staff differs from RJA most significantly. Exhibit "B" details the Administration and Supervision costs for the County and the City. This analysis indicates that in this item alone, the City can realize a $70,000 savings by assuming maintenance management responsibility. It is on the basis of administrative savings that staff is recommending dis- continuation of the County Maintenance Contract. The City maintenance program to replace county service will be detailed more fully through the budget process and will depend on the level of services which the Council will choose to deliver. At a minimum, the program out- lined on Page 8 of the RJA report would be implemented. This would involve the hiring of three (3) additional maintenance employees, the acquisition of a patch truck and patching equipment at an estimated cost of $45,000. In addition, the staff will be recommending acquistion of a dump truck with blade combination for storm clean -up and general use. The cost of this is estimated at $32,000. Equipment acquisition is the major problem with assuming the maintenance • responsibility. The equipment costs are included within the work program, however, cannot be purchased with Gas Tax funds. Purchase of all equipment will come from the City General fund. This equipment will then be rented to the Public Works Department and funds will be placed in a replacement fund for future equipment needs. In order to minimize the impact on the General fund of this start up cost, the staff is researching lease purchase agreements for the equipment needed. Additional information should be avail- able at the Council meeting. As was indicated, the purpose of this study was simply to analyze the benefits of conducting maintenance operations through means other than through contract with the County Road Department. Staff has not yet completed its full analysis of the work program and manpower needs for the 1980 -81 fiscal year. This analysis will include integration of the park and parkway maintenance and a major appraisal of street sweeping and tree trimming programs. Full manpower and equipment options will be presented through this years budget process. • Discontinuation of Maintenance Contract • page 3 January 16, 1980 It is recommended that the Council direct staff to notify the San Bernardino County Road Department of its intention to discontinue maintenance services as of July 30, 1980 and instruct staff to make all arrangements necessary to assume those responsibilities through a combination of City staff and contract services. It is further requested that the Council authorize staff to solicit and receive bids for the acquisition of patching equipment for Council review and acquisition prior to July 1, 1980. Respectfully subnil:ted, Lloyd OHubbs City Engineer LBH:deb `J r • s �V EXHIBIT "A" ACTIVITY COST COMPARISONS FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAINTENANCE PROGRAM m es swept every other week, or 26 times per year, subject to adjustment by the City Council. =Ones not represent optimum cost. 'Rough estimates. Reasonably accurate cost data are not available. 4See text explanation on previous page. (County administrative costs distributed among all maintenance activities.) 'Does not represent optimum cost. 'Assumes full utilization of equipment -- an assumption that is not valid for Rancho Cucamonga. Actual equipment cost, including idle time, would increase total cost to more than $435,000. Also see text explanation on previous page. 0 is Estimated Annual Activity Cost Annual San Bernardino City of Private Activity Quantity County Rancho Cucamonga Contractor Minor Surface Patching 60 tons E 4,797 ; 5,170 $ 10,800 Pavement Failure Repair 680 tons 38,956 36,944 30,600 Crack Sealing 500 gallons 2,216 1,735 4,250 Surface Leveling 600 tons 21,905 20,742 18,900 Street Sweeping 2,600 miles` 42,373 43,810 34,840 Sign Maintenance 290 man hours 5,918 6,334 6,235 Traffic Maintenance N/A 35,000 35,000 35,000 Reshaping Shoulders 60 miles 25,360 25,320 29,400 Re7ravel Shoulders 200 cu. yds. 30,282 3,064 2,700 True Trimming 1,100 trees 62,914 65,110 46.926 Ditch Cleaning 3,000 lin. ft. 2,568 2,250 4,500 Mechanical Clean -up 1,800 man hours 24,330 27,612 27,000 W Curb 8 Sidewalk Repair 1,600 man hours 23,729 24,176 22,400 Miscellaneous 2,400 man hours 37.383 28 600 58 320 $331,871 Sub - total' $330,478 $326,067 Maintenance Management' (N /A) man hours 134,270 66,000 103.000 Total' $464,748 $392,067 '434,871 m es swept every other week, or 26 times per year, subject to adjustment by the City Council. =Ones not represent optimum cost. 'Rough estimates. Reasonably accurate cost data are not available. 4See text explanation on previous page. (County administrative costs distributed among all maintenance activities.) 'Does not represent optimum cost. 'Assumes full utilization of equipment -- an assumption that is not valid for Rancho Cucamonga. Actual equipment cost, including idle time, would increase total cost to more than $435,000. Also see text explanation on previous page. 0 is EXHIBIT "B" MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS City Engineer City Field Supervisor Secretary City Hall Cost County Supervision per Agreement Administrative Overhead 13% Risk Management Insurance 5% Facility Rental COUNTY 79 -80 CITY E 10,000 $ 10,000 15,000 20,000 3,000 7,000 2,000 10,000 45,012 0 36,514 0 14,044 7,000 8,700 12,000 $ 134,270 $ 66,000 DIFFERENCE = $ 68,270 .Ti J Facilities Rental Charge - $725.00 per month • �—V CITY Of RANC•PO CUCAMONGA ANNUAL WORK PROGRAM 1979 -80 PROPOSED 79 -80 DIRECT 79 -80 MAINTENANCE PROPOSED COST PER BUDGET ACTIVITY MAN DAYS MAMI /DAY (Preliminary) Supervision 372 $ 121.00 S 45,012 Traffic Maintenance 220 136.00 30,000 Miscellaneous 113 148.00 16,754 Tree Work 117 143.00 39,182 Structure Maintenance 88 134.00 11.808 Shoulder Grading 102 148.00 15,100 Cleaning Debris 20 130.00 2,600 Chemical Weed Control 0 0.00 0 Mechanical Weed Control 37 145.00 5,328 Sweeping 26 156.00 4,056 • Hand Patching 111 145.00 16,095 Equipment Patch 214 210.00 44,940 Storm Maintenance 324 154.00 50,000 1,744 S 280,875 + 13;° Administrative 50,557 Overhead 8 5% Risk Management TOTAL S 331,432 Facilities Rental Charge - $725.00 per month • �—V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 1980 TO: City Council & City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: BLOCK GRANT FUNDS - "NORTH TOWN" STREET IMPROVEMENTS The City Council has currently adopted the attached Community Development Program for the expenditure of $517,600 in Community Development block grant funds. These funds were programmed to include street improvements and park acquisition and development in the "North Town" area. The fund allocations were based on preliminary cost estimates and the recommendation of the local Citizens Participation Advisory Committee. The Committee's first priority has been the street improvement project. In October of this fiscal year, the Council approved the design contract with C G Engineering to complete Plans for the project. This contract was structured to evaluate street construction needs and cost estimates • for two different areas. The primary area (as shown on the attached map) was the area east of Turner Avenue including 24th, 25th, 26th, Humbolt, Center and Marine. The secondary area, east of Archibald Avenue, included Feron, Reid and Main Street. C G Engineering recently completed preliminary plans and estimates for both project areas. This information was reviewed with the Community and the CPAC on January 3, 1980. At this meeting, those present were informed that current estimates for construction in the primary area was $450,000 and the secondary area $145,000. The total project estimate is $595,000 including all engineering. * Because the total street project exceeds all funds available, the Community was asked what their priority for fund allocation would be and how they felt about the street construction in relation to park development. It was the unanimous opinion of those present and the CPAC to fund the entire street project to completion before any park development. In order to phase the project to the availability of funds, the group was asked to prioritize street construction. The following was the adopted priority: ON "North Town" Street Improvements Page 2 January 16, 1980 Phase 1 Estimated Cost Humbolt, 24th, 25th and 26th Streets $ 345,334 Phase 2 Feron, Reid and Main (South side E/o Reid) Streets $ 145,000 Phase 3 Center and Main Streets $105,482 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council adopt the Community recommendation to construct street improvements in "North Town" by the above listed priority sequence and to instruct staff to notify the County Community Development Department of this action to adjust the current program. As a first step in the implementation of the new program, it is recommended that the attached amendment to the design contract be executed by the Council for the increased design scope. This agreement covers the detail design and construction staking for the secondary and increases the $42,000 contract by $12,900. Respectfully submitted, Lloyd B. Hubbs City Engineer LBH:deb J I-1 LJ • • le i to NORTN TOWN "S77Cza -r /M PROV6Ajjm,V T' pRo -CCT L-/A4/7-.S J c vAa 41ei MA7a f1 UP PA✓ /Nb R4NcC"- yo c vc,}MONGA C G ENGINEERING Consultants to Government December 31, 1979 Lloyd B. Hubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline Suite A Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: North Town improvements Dear Lloyd: Submitted herewith is the revised cost estimate for the aforementioned project. We have incorporated into this estimate the revisions discussed at our meeting of Decemer 12th. We anticipate a more detailed discussion of these revisions and additional construction alternatives with you at our afternoon meeting January 3rd. Enclncl Eosures 7937ESTNI .• Very truly yours, • Dave Barakian Project Manager r� U 2627 RU, WATERMAN AVFNI IF, SVITF F • RAN nFRNARnl%*n r AT IFnRNIA nama . "Tin 4'474+ Sheet 1 of 7 ''E SUMMARY SHEET • Rev. 12 -26 -79 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE Rancho Cucamonga - "North Town" Area A - Turner Ave. to Marine Ave. and Humbolt Ave. to 26th St. Street Cost W/O Agg Base Humbolt Avenue $73,492.00 71,692.00 24th Street 116,070.00 114,470.00 25th Street 99,256.00 97,856.00 26th Street 63,016.00 61,316.00 Center Avenue 74,216.00 73,566.00 Marine Avenue 32,366.00 31,916.00 `, • GRAND TOTAL $458,416.00 $450,816.00 USE $460,000.00 $450,000.00 Sheet 1 of 7 ''E PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE Rancho Cucamonga - "North Torn" Area A - Turner Ave. to Marine Ave. and Humbolt Ave. to 26th St. HUMBOLT AVENUE 8" Concrete curb 8 gutter 1578 L.F. @ $7.00 - $11,046. 3" Asphalt Concrete 446 TON @ 30.00 - 13,380. 4" Aggregate Base (if necessary) 180 TON @ 10.00 1,800. 4 and 6 ft. P.C.C. Sidewalk 4790 S.F. @ 2.00 = 9,580. Drive Approach 2982 S.F. @ 2.40 7,156. A. C. Berm 25 L.F. @ 4.50 337. Type L. Marker 6 Ea. @ 20.00 - 120. Removals b Clearing L.S. . 10,000. Earthwork 550 C.Y. @ 6.00 3,300. $6,720. ♦ 10% contingincies 5,672. Subtotal 62,392. Survey and Design Engineering 4,100. Construction Engineering and Administration 7,000. Total estimate Humbolt Avenue $73,492. JASIc Sheet 2 of 7 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE Rancho Cucamonga - "North Town" Area A - Turner Ave to Marine Ave and Humbolt Ave. to 26th St. 24th Street 8" Concrete curb 6 gutter 3160 L.F. @ $7.00 - $22120.00 3" Asphalt Concrete 437 Tons @ 30.00 - 13110.00 4" Aggregate Base (if necessary) 160 Tons @ 10.00 = 1600.00 4 and 6 ft. P.C.C. Sidewalk 14256 S.F. @ 2.00 28512.00 Drive Approach 3492 S.F. @ 2.40 = 8380.80 A.C. Berm 100 L.F. @ 4.50 450.00 Removals and Clearing L.s. 10000.00 Earthwork 650 C.Y. @ 6.00 3900.00 88073.00 + 10% contingincies 3007.00 Subtotal .96880.00 JASIc Surveying and Design Engineering 8190.00 Construction Engineering and Administration 11000.00 Total Estimate $116070.0 i 24th Street R'y Sheet 3 of 7 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE Rancho Cucamonga - "North Town" Area A - Turner Ave. to Marine Ave. and Humbolt Ave. to 26th St. 25th Street 8" Concrete curb E gutter 3" Asphalt Concrete 4" Aggregate Base (if necessary) 4 and C ft. .P.C.C. Sidewalk Drive Approach 8" A.C. Berm Removal and Clearing Earthwork JASIc 2595 L.F. @ $7.00 125 Ton @ 30.00 140 Ton @ 10.00 14532 S.F. @ 2.00 5292 S.F. @ 2.80 115 L.F. @ 4.50 L.S. 500 C.Y. @ 6.00 + 10% contingincies Subtotal Survey and Design Engineering Construction Engineering and Administration Total Estimate 25th Street Sheet 4 of 7 $IB165.00 = 3760.00 = 1400.00 = 29064.00 12700.00 = 517.50 = 6000.00 anon on $74606.00 7460.00 $82066.30 8190.00 9000.00 $99256.00 F- L PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE Rancho Cucamonga - "North Town" Area A - Turner Ave. to Marine Ave. and Numbolt Ave. to 26th St. 26th Street W Concrete curb E gutter 1397 L.F. @ $7.00 $9779.00 8" P.C.C. curb only 63 L.F. @ 5.00 315.00 3" Asphalt Concrete 195 Tons @ 30.00 5850.00 4" Aggregate Base (if necessary) 170 Tons @ 10.00 1700.00 4 and 6 ft. P.c..C. Sidewalk 5662 S.F. @ 2.00 11324.00 Drive Approach 3025 S.F. @ 2.40 7260.00 Cross Gutter 198 S.F. @ 2.40 475.20 A.C. Berm 56 L.F. @ 4.50 = 252.00 Concrete Spandrel 360 S.F. @ 2.40 864.00 Removal and Clearing L.S. 9000.00 Earthwork 250 C.V. @ 6.00 1500.00 Adjust Manhole 1 Ea. @ 150.00 150.00 48469.00 ♦ 10% continginencies 4847.00 Subtotal 53316.00 Surveying and Design Engineering 4100.00 Construction Engineering and Administration 5600.00 Total Estimate 26th Street 63016.00 JASic . I Sheet 5 of 7 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE Rancho Cucamonga - "North Town" Area A - Turner Ave to Marine Ave. and Humbolt Ave. to 26th St. Center Street 8" Concrete curb 6 gutter 1606 L.F. @ $7.00 - $11242.00 3" Asphalt Concrete 47 Tons @ 30.00 1410.00 4" Aggregate Base (if necessary) 65 Tons @ 10.00 650.00 4 and 6 ft. P.C.C.Sidewalk 10288 S.F. @ 2.00 - 20576.00 Drive Approach 1944 S.F. @ 2.40 4665.50 Cross Gutter 1386 S.F. @ 2.40 3326.40 8" P.C.C. Curb only 315 L.F. @ 5.00 - 1575.00 Concrete Spandrel 1800 S.F. @ 2.40 = 4320.00 Adjust Manhole 1 Ea. @ 150.00 150.00 Removals and Clearing L.S. 8000.00 Earthwork 150 C.Y. @ 6.00 900.00 56815.00 10% contingincies 5691.00 Subtotal 62496.00 Survey and Design Engineering 4720.00 JASIc Construction Engineering and Administration 7000.00 Total Estimate Center Street 74216.00 Sheet 6 of 7 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE Rancho Cucamonga - "North Town" Area A - Turner Ave. to Marine Ave. and Humbolt Ave. to 26th St. Marine Avenue 8" Concrete curb 6 gutter 776 L.F. @ $7.00 $5432.00 3" Asphalt Concrete 145 Tons @ 30.00 = 4350.00 4" Aggregate Base (if necessary) 45 Tons @ 10.00 = 450.00 4 and 6 ft. P.C.C. Sidewalk 3836 S.F. @ 2.00 7672.00 Drive Approach 216 S.F. @ 2.40 518.40 Cross Gutter 645 S.F. @ 2.40 1548.00 8" P.C.C. Curb only 157 L.F. @ 5,00 785.00 Concrete Spandrel 900 S.F. @ 2.40 2160.00 Removal and Clearing L.S. 2000.00 Earthwork 100 C.Y. @ 6.00 = 600.00 • 25515.00 + 10% contingincies 2551.00 Subtotal 28066.00 Survey and Design Engineering 2200.00 Construction Engineering and Administration 2100.00 Total Estimate Marine Avenue .32366.00 JASIc Sheet 7 of 7 v° 4 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE Rancho Cucamonga - "North Town" Area 8 - Archibald Ave. to Ramona Ave. and Main St. to Feron St. Feron St., Main St., and Ried Ave. 8" Concrete Curb & Gutter 3163 LF @ $7.00 = $22,141.00 3" Asphalt Concrete 325 Tons @ 30.00 = 9,750.00 4" Aggregate Base (if necessary) 407 Tons @ 10.00 = 4,070.00 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk 12,604 SF @ 2.00 = 25,208.00 Drive Approach 8,640 SF @ 1.90 = 16,416.00 Cross Gutter 1,500 SF @ 2.40 = 3,600.00 Alley Approach 624 SF @ 1.90 = 1,185.00 Clearing , Removals & Earthwork L.S. = 28,000.00 $110,370.00 + 10% Continrincies 11,000.00 Subtotal = $121,370.00 Engineering Design & Surveying 8,500.00 Construction Engineering and Administration = 15,000.00 Estimated rest = 5144,810.00 Estimate accurate to '79 - '80 Fiscal Year prices Add 12 per year thereafter CG ENGINEERING Consultants to Government January 8, 1980 Mr. Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 940 Baseline, Suite A Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Proposed Street Improvements "North Town" Amendment to Contract - Addendum No.I Dear Lloyd: Transmitted herewith for your consideration and further handling is an Addendum to the original contract for the street design services for North Town. This Addendum is to extend the services as outlined in the original agreement • dated October 17,1979, to include the area West of Archibald Avenue to Ramona Avenue and Feron Street to Main Street. Also the services by this Addendum include the South side of Main Street between Ried Street and Ramona Avenue. The Addendum has included a very important time table for completion of the services. As concluded in the public hearing held on January 3, 1980, the goal will be to complete the plans for bidding in March. As a part of the Addendum, we will analyze the proposed contract to provide for an alternate bid to enable maximizing the use of available funds. Should there be any questions please do not hesitate to call. JASaj 7937AGRE04 Vel truly you s, C4 /Jo n A. Starner Vice President CITY OF RANCHO UCAMONGA COMMUNITy OEVEIOPMENr OEPr. AM JAN 19 1900 PU 718191101111I21112A31915 8 2627 00, WATERMAN AVRN119. RIME E • RAN RRRNARnINn r'ALWORNIA R2 4nR • (71,09242420 ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND C G ENGINEERING DATED OCTOBER 17, 1979, PROVIDING FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES REGARDING STREET IMPROVEMENTS NORTH TOWN AREA The following amendments are hereby made: Under "1. Employment of Engineer" include the following streets for final plans specifications and estimates. This work to include an analysis of incorporating an alternate bid method for the contract, and, in the event the city does approve the alternate bid procedure, engineer will complete the plans, specifications, and estimate on that basis. FERON STREET - Curb and sidewalk along South side between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue. MAIN STREET - Curb and sidewalk and match -up paving along North side between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue. Curb and sidewalk and match -up paving along South side between Reid Avenue and Ramona Avenue. REID AVENUE - Curb and sidewalk along both sides and match -up paving between Main Street and Feron Street. PACP THREE: Under "A. Preliminary Design, Item 3. Perform field surveys as follows: ", engineer to complete all necessary field survey work to enable final design services to be completed for Feron, and Main Streets, and Reid Avenue. PAGE SIX: Under 2. Compensation: Item 2) - indicates a "not to exceed amount of $20,500." Revise this amount to be "not to exceed $30,700.00." Item 3 is estimated to be $11,000. Revise this amount to be $14,000.00. 2 163 n U Under "4. Time of Completion, Item 2) Final Design" indicates 9 weeks after reciept of the Notice to Proceed from City. Revise this to read "2) Final Design - to be completed by March 14, 19801' IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City of Rancho Cucamonga and C G Engineering have executed this Addendum Number One this day of 1980. ATTEST: City Clerk 7ASaj 7937AGRE • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A Municipal Corporation By, Mayor C G ENGINEERING A California Corporation ays President 3 E40 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MR40RANDUM Date: January 16, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: Letter received from Leany Development Company In reference to the attached letter received from Lesney Development Co., a meeting has been scheduled with them on Friday, January 11, 1980 at 2:30 p.m. After this meeting, a brief report will be prepared for the Council members and will be placed in your box in the Administrative Office on Monday, January 14, 1980. F Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Director of Comaunity Development JL:nm 12A4 C L SNY DEVELOPMENT CO. • POST OFFICE eOX 5596. OEVEOLYX ILLS. CA 90310.5300 WILSX IRE SOIILEVAPO. SEVEPLY MILLS. CA 902 11. 13131555.911] December 26, 1979 Honorable James Frost, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 793 City of Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 Re: Woodhaven Manor N/W Corner Lemon and Haven CHFA N79 -27 -S Dear Mr. Frost: On May 14, 1979 we received a site ranking of II on a proposed section 8 project of 130 family apartment units from the California Housing Finance Agency. Section 8 funding was set aside for this project from HUD through CHFA. The applica- tion and approval were based on reliance that the City of Rancho Cucamonga would start accepting development applications • in January 1980. For various reasons it now appears that the City will delay accepting applications and granting project approvals until mid to late1980. This delay in likelihood would result in the transfer of the funds to another project outside of the City which could commence construction at an earlier date. We believe, as does CHFA, that some affordable housing under this section 8 program is "sorely needed" in this area. With further reductions in funding for this program anticipated by us in 1980 and beyond, it would appear to us that every effort should be made to retain funding on this project to the extent possible. Accordingly request is made herewith that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consider the following: 1) Exempt this project from the current moratorium, and 2) Modify the growth management plan to provide priority processing for this project. Enclosed are copies of three letters from CHFA dated 5/14/79, 10/17/79 and 11/29/79 which I think will be of assistance. n U December 26, 1979 • Honormable James Frost, Mayor Page 2 2 would be pleased to meet with the City or be present at any hearings on this matter to provide such additional information as may be found useful. Sincerely yours, LESNY D LOPMENT CO. i By. ,R dolph J. Lowy Executive Vice President RJL:llk cc: City of Rancho Cucamonga - M. Barry Hogan, Senior Planner with enclosure O CALIFORNIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY r" October 17, 1979 , 8 1919 Mr. Chandan Das lesny Development Co. 477 South Fairfax Ins Angeles, Calif. 90036 Be: 1400dhaven Manor CHFA #79 -27—S Dear Mr. Das Pursuant to our discussion of last week, I am awaiting your ford written request for ranking extension past the current November 29, 1979, deadline. Please supply us with evidence from the City of Rancho Cucamonga that its Growth Management Plan and effective moratorium of building permit issuances has or will be extended. Any additional information would be appreciated. As you are aware, we have reserved Section 8 subsidy funding for this pro- ject. If it appears that the city processing of this project will be held up for an indefinite period of time, we will have to reassess our re- servation position and give consideration to the re- targeting of funding to an alternate. more viable project. Sincerely, Barry J. Associate Fk� gage Officer BX:pal 10960 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD LOS ANGEL7C 1-11ORNIA 90024 0 • • 12131 4794383 lJ CALIFORNIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY November 29, 1979 Mr. Rudolph J. Lowy Executive Vice President Lesny Development Co. P.O. Box 5526 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Re: Woodhaven Manor CHFA #79 -27 -5 Dear Mr. Lowy: Thank you for advising us of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council's decision to begin accepting applications in mid -1980. We share your disappointment at the current moratorium that exists for issuance of sewer permits for this area and have • made several attempts to get a waiver of this moratorium because of the nature of the referenced project - namely, development of sorely needed subsidized rental units for family housing. Please continue to keep us apprised of any new development. If you have any questions or need further information, please let me know. Steinncce, -ree -lye // Ma' rgo KaiEoff �`�'��� v Vice President 10960 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD �I LOS ANGEL. /, LIFORNIA 90024 (2131479-4383 . C iIQU.CE 0LSM-10 ]hG ( I OR I ) To: Mr. Rudolph J. Lowy Lesny Development Co. 477 South Fairfax Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90036 RE: Name of development Woodhaven CHFAO : 79- 21 -S__ Street address: N/W Corner of Lemon & Haven Avenues City: Rancho Cuc County: San Bernardino The staff of the CHFA has reviewed the Request for Site Approval on the referenced project and visited the site. You are hereby notified that the site has been given the following grade II • You are invited 'to submit a full application as described in the at- tached Summary..' This site grade is subject to the following limitations: Commitment package must be completed and approved by: 7/20/79 (date) 2. Preliminary construction bu3get: $4,653,852 3. For use as a r-71 Family 0 Elderly 4. Maximum land value: r] $ as requested ®$ as modified Amount subject to CHFA appraisal (see 9a) 5. Maximum building height: 2 stories • 6. Maximum number and acceptable size of units: 124 total; 1BR ( sq.ft.); 31 2BR .'(850 sq.ft.); 62 3BR (1050sq.ft.).; Other 31 4 -BR (1250 sq. ft.) 7. Number of subsidized units: 124 8. Members of the development team hereby approved: x Architect EDC Inc. (by: _) Consultant (by: ) Developer /Sponsor Lesny Development Co. (by. Contractor (by:_) 9. Other limitations: a) The reduction in units from th 165 requested to the 124 acceptable results in an excessively high land value per unit. As there is some measure of flexibility in this assigned value, a relatively propor- tional adjustment must be made. After you have analyzed and accepted these limitations, please sign below and return. If not returned within 20 days, this notice shall become void. In the event you do not meet the deadlines in Item I, the Section 8 subsidy (if any) may be assigned to the next project. If you wish any further iy f�� ti n, please contact me. Acknowledged by: �/� ,�_..� By: _ _ Developer /Sponsor: -/ Name: far Kai of f• ,"vn� Name: R4,/e�/r ✓. .Cam-y Title: iAW4 Title: ,��;,, (. ;'� ^, /, y,: ✓.J' Mo gage Officer 12/78 /00 C du ICE O1TE RANKING (1 OR li) TO` Mr. Rudolph J. Lowy • Lesny Development Co. 477 South Fairfax Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90036 CHFA.: 79 -21 -5 RE: Name of development Woodhaven Manor Street address: _N /W Corner of Lemon & Haven Avenues City: Rancho Cucamonga County: San Bernardino The staff of the CHFA has reviewed the Request for Site Approval on the referenced project and visited the site. You are hereby notified that the site has been given the following grade II You are invited to submit a full application as described in the at- tached Summary. This site grade is subject to the following limitations: 1. Commitment package must be completed and approved by: 7 (date) 2. Pre iminary construction budget: $4,653,852 3. For use as a M Family Q Elderly 4. Maximum land value: ® $ as requested 5 as modified Amount subject to CHFA appraisal (see 9a) S. Maximum building height: 2 stories S. Maximum number and acceptab-Tesize of units: 124 total; 1BR ( sq.ft.); 31 2BR .'(850 sq.ft.); 62 3BR (1050sq.ft.).; Other 31 4 -BR (1250 sq. ft.) 7. Number of subsidized units: 124 8. Members of the development team hereby approved: ® Architect EDC Inc. (by: _) Consultant (b y• ) Developer /Sponsor Lesny Development Co. (by. Contractor (by; ) 9. Other limitations: a) The reduction in units from th 165 requested to the 124 acceptable results in an excessively high land value per unit. As there is some measure of flexibility in this assigned value, a relatively propor- tional adjustment must be made. After you have analyzed and accepted these limitations, please sign below and return. If not returned within 20 days, this notice shall become void. In the event you do not meet the deadlines in Item I, the Section 8 subsidy (if any) may be assigned to the next project. If you wish any further iDforriat`i n, please contact me. Acknowledged by: 1 ,�-. B Deve lope r /Sponsor•.f Name: ~ Name: R4' /��/ Ma r4 Kai/off ✓. .Cc a; ✓ Title: 510 gage Office Title: .c �<:. G:'.a '' n:�..,F 12/78 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE "A" The passage of Measure "A" will provide for the appointment of the Clerk and Treasurer by your elected City Council. At present, the The Clerk and Treasurer perform specific technical functions required by State law. They are not policy makers for the residents, and if elected, would represent an additional bureaucratic level of government. Direct appointment by the City Council will: (1) Promote efficiency and further reduce government cost by allowing the functions of Clerk and Treasurer to be performed by existing trained City personnel. (2) Encourage the timely administration of the Clerk and Treasurer responsibilities. (3) Eliminate election expenses to the City for these offices. (4) Assure that the offices will be filled by the appointment of technically competent persons. A YES VOTE ON MEASURE "A" CONTINUES THE EFFICIENT GOVERNMENT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS MEMBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT FOR A CITY MEASURE. WHEREAS, a regular general municipal election is to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga on April 8, 1980, at which there will be submitted to the qualified electors of said City the following City measure: MEASURE A Shall the offices of City Clerk and YES _ City Treasurer be appointive? NO f NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER, as follows: Section 1. That this City Council, being the legislative body of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby authorizes • Arthur Bridge, Jon Mikels, Michael Palombo, Phillip Schlosser, James C. Frost members of said body, to file a written argument for the City measure set forth in the recitals hereof in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 5 of the Elections Code of the State of California and to change said argument until and including the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against said City measure may be submitted to him. ATTEST: City Clerk f PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of January, 1980. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -7 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF SAID CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO THE GENERAL LAW CITIES AND FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SAID CITY OF A CERTAIN QUESTION, MEASURE "A" RELATING TO WHETHER THE OFFICES OF CITY CLERK AND CITY TREASURER SHALL BE APPOINTIVE AT THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California has called a municipal election for the 8th day of April, 1980, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga also desires to submit to the qualified electors of said City at said election the question, proposition, or measure relating to whether the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer shall be appointive hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That said City Council, pursuant to its right and •authority so to do, does hereby determine that there shall be and there is hereby ordered submitted to the qualified electors of said City at said regular general municipal election the following question, to wit: Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive? YES NO A (punch mark) (cross +) placed in the voting square after the word "YES" in the manner hereinbefore provided shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the question or porposition. A (punch mark) (cross +) placed in the voting square after the word "NO" the manner hereinbefore provided shall be counted against the adoption of the question or proposition. Section 2. That for the purpose of holding said regular general municipal election, there shall be and are hereby established fifty-two (52) voting precincts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga established for the holding of state and county elections, as said regular election precincts exist on the date of adoption of this resolution; that the polling places for the respective precincts shall be the places hereinafter designated; that the persons hereinafter named, beinq competent and qualified electors and residents of said City and of their respective voting precincts and they shall hold said election and make return thereof in the manner provided by law. Voting Precinct 1, comprising regular election precincts R.C. 2 Polling Place: Morgan Residence, 7990 Orchard Street, Alta Loma Inspector: Sharron Morgan, 7990 Orchard Street, Alta Loma Judge: Rose Meserole, 7975 Orchard Street, Alta Loma Judge: Renza Conger, 8155 Hillside Road Alta Loma Clerks: Percy Smith, 7990 Orchard Street, Alta Loma 77 Page 2 Voting Precinct 2, comprising regular election precincts 3, 5 Polling Place: Stork School, Jasper Street, Alta Loma . Inspector: Margaret Decourcey, 6264 Napa Avenue, Alta Loma Judge: LaVae Stevenson, 6320 Topaz, Alta Loma Judge: Cheryl Heimbruch, 5071 Via Serena, Alta Loma Clerk: Wanda Johnson, 8371 Pumalo, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 3, comprising regular election precincts 4 Polling Place: Vernon Residence, 5729 Napa Court, Alta Lana Inspector: Lura Burrell, 8601 Surrey Lane, Alta Loma Judge: Gloria C. Vernon, 5729 Napa Court, Alta Loma Judge: Martha Tyree, 8531 Buggy Whip Road, Alta Loma Clerk: Susan Shepherd, 8615 Surrey Lane, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 4, comprising regular election precinct 6 Polling Place: Parker Residence, 9461 Valley View Street, Alta Lana Inspector: Edith Bonhus, 9086 Appaloose Court, Alta Loma Judge: Betty Case, 8837 Strang Lane, Alta Loma Judge: Marie Glover, 9016 Wirlaway Court, Alta Loma Clerk: Betty Parker, 9461 Valley View Street, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 5, comprising regular election precinct 7 Polling Place: Reese Residence, 6063 Eastwood, Alta Loma Inspector: Mary Blanchard, 9030 Manzanita Drive, Alta Loma Judge: Sandra Oerly, 5652 Emerald Court, Alta Loma Judge: Sharon Bignell, 5936 Layton Street, Alta Lana Clerk: Ruth Hutchinson, 9081 Cottonwood Way, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 6, comprising regular election precinct 8 Polling Place: Alta Loma Junior High School, 9000 Lemon Avenue, Inspector: Marilyn Sonkoly, 6356 Garnet, Alta Loma Judge: June Whiteside, 8727 Orange Street, Alta Loma Judge: Dorothy Lacey, 6340 Sunstone, Alta Loma Clerk: Evelyn Nichols, 6355 Vineyard, Alta Loma • Alta Lom Voting Precinct 7, comprising reqular election precinct 13 Polling Place: Johnson residence, 9394 Alta Loma Drive, Alta Loma Inspector: Marion Johnson, 9394 Alta Loma Drive, Alta Loma Judge: Aletha McLain, 9369 Lemon Avenue, Alta Loma Judge: Pauline Evans, 9358 Somerset Drive, Alta Loma Clerk: Eleanor Aranda, 6245 Beryl Avenue, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 8, comprising regular election precinct 20 Polling Place: Chaffey College, 5885 Haven Avenue, Alta Lome Inspector: Pat Jackson, 6431 Haven Avenue, Alta Loma Judge: E. Long, 6206 Mayberry, Alta Loma Judge: Judy Ott, 4571 Archibald, Alta Loma Clerk: Madline Shipley, 8915 Alta Loma Drive, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 9, comprising regular election precinct 19 Polling Place: Alta Vista Mobile Home Park, 10350 Baseline, Alta Loma Inspector: Elizabeth Hull, 6765 Mesada Street, Alta Loma Judge: Charlotte Tafoya, 10350 Baseline, Alta Loma • Judge: Katherine Pearson, 9998 Monte Vista, Alta Loma Clerk: Irene Gardner, 10350 Baseline, Alta Loma �' page 3 Voting Precinct 10, comprising regular election precinct 18 Polling Place: Alta Laguna Mobile Home Park, 10210 Baseline, Alta Lana Inspector; Minnie Heathcock, 10210 Baseline, Alta Loma Judge: Norma Howard, 10210, Baseline, Alta Loma Judge: Betty Miller, 10210 Baseline, Alta Lama Clerk: Ruth Crean, 10210 Baseline, Alta Loma Clerk: Germaine Grams, 10210 Baseline, Alta Lama Voting Precinct 11, comprising regular election precinct 17 Polling Place: Ramona Villa Mobile Estates, 9800 Baseline, Alta Loma Inspector: Angelina Bertino, 9800 Baseline, Alta Lana Judge: Elizabeth Bille, 9800 Baseline, Alta Lama Judge: Ralph Dustman, 7118 Elmhurst Avenue, -Alta Loma Clerk: Kay Skinnel, 9800 Baseline, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 12, comprising regular election precinct 15, 16 Polling Place: Chaparrel Heights Mobile Home Park, 6880 N. Archibald Avenue, Alta Lama Inspector: Marjorie Boesen, 9529 Nineteenth Street, Alta Loma Judge: Ruth Maxie, 6880 Archibald, Alta Loma Judge: Derobert Fisher, 6880 Archibald, Alta Lana Clerk: Myrtle Iles, 6880 Archibald, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 13, comprising regular election precinct 12, 14 Polling Place: Alta Loma High School, 8880 Baseline, Alta Loma Inspector: Lorrine Walker, 9076 Baseline, Alta Loma • Judge: Delores Bryan, 7090 Garnet Street, Alta Loma Judge: Joy Perdew, 7236 Hellman, Alta Loma Clerk: Bernice Rogers, 6938 Eastwood Avenue, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 14, comprising regular election precincts 10, 52 Polling Place: Carnelian Elementary School, 7105 Carnelian, Alta Loma Inspector: Dorothy Kneur, 8765 Monte Vista Street, Alta Loma Judge: Eva Hunt, 8617 Hamilton Avenue, Alta Loma Judge: Aurora Rodriguez, 6730 Opal Street, Alta Loma Clerk: Ann Parra, 6860 Topaz Street, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 15, comprising regular election precincts 9, 11, 32, 33 Polling Place: Willis Residence, 7608 Buena Vista, Cucamonga Inspector: Sally Hettle, 7723 Calle Casino, Cucamonga Judge: Lois Willis, 7608 Buena Vista, Cucamonga Judge: Rosalie Grigsby, 7547 Alta Cuesta, Cucamonga Clerk: Suzanne Speiser, 7052 Topaz Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 16, comprising regular election precincts 34, 35, 36 Polling Place: Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Baseline, Cucamonga Inspector: Ada Cooper, 8520 Red Hill Drive, Cucamonga Judge: Gladys Josund, 8537 Chula Vista Court, Cucamonga Judge: Angie Hill, 9135 Baseline, Cucamonga Clerk: Jack Hansen, 7839 Buena Vista, Cucamonga • page 4 Voting Precinct 17, comprising regular election precincts 41, 44 • Polling Place: Sweeten Hall, 9324 San Bernardino Road, Cucamonga Inspector: Mary Jenkins, 9254 San Bernardino Road, Cucamonga Judge: Mary Warda, 9673 San Bernardino Road, Cucamonga Judge: Connie Pizzuto, 9661 San Bernardino Road, Cucamonga Clerk: Jacquelyn Lewis, 9100 Hemlock Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 18, comprising regular election precincts 42, 43, 45 Polling Place: Cucamonga Fire Station, 9612 San Bernardino Road, Cucamon, Inspector: Barbara Gakle, 9630 San Bernardino Road, Cucamonga Judge: Suzanne Malsberger, 7785 Malachite Avenue, Cucamonga Judge: Louise Wade, 9674 Balsa Street, Cucamonga Clerk: Winifred Davis, 9629 Balso Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 19, comprising regular election precinct 47 Polling Place: Central School, 7955 Archibald Avenue, Cucamonga Inspector: Nyla Glover, 7515 Burgundy Avenue, Cucamonga Judge: Grace Hamilton, 9762 Church Street, Ccuamonga Judge: Gladys Hawblitzel, 7334 Cambridge Avenue, Cucamonga Clerk: Pam Wright, 9560 Pepper Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 20, comprising regular election precinct 48 Polling Place: Bonella Residence, 10155 Norwick Street,Cucamonga Inspector: Lillian Connolly, 10269 Dorset Street, Cucamonga Judge: Sam Bonella, 10155 Norwick Street,Cucamonga Judge: Barbara Maxfield, 10176 Norviick Street, Cucamonga • Clerk: Lucy Robinson, 10166 Norwick Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 21, comprising regular election precincts 46, 49 Polling Place: Green Residence, 8227 Layton Street, Cucamonga Inspector: Patricia Green, 8227 Layton Street, Cucamonga Judge: Mr. Green (husband) 8227 Layton Street, Cucamonga Judge: Lillian Hovey, 9798 Hampshire Street, Cucamonga Clerk: Mary Henderson, 9778 Hampshire Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 22, comprising regular election precincts 50, 51 Polling Place: Neighborhood Community Center, 9791 Arrow, Cucamonga Inspector: Geneviva Keith, 8949 Belmont Avenue, Cucamonga Judge: Marie Noyce, 9744 Arrow, Cucamonga Judge: Mary Leyva, 9890 Jersey Blvd,, Cucamonga Clerk: Philip Confer, 8671 Willow Drive, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 23, comprising regular election precincts 39, 40 Polling Place: Los Amigos Int, School, 8646 Baker Avenue, Cucamonga Inspector: Mary Wood, 8781 Edwin Street, Cucamonga Judge: Georgia Herron, 8236 Ninth Street, Cucamonga Judge: Herbert Kissell, 8763 Hyacinth, Cucamonga Clerk: Margaret Kissell, 8763 Hyacinth, Cucamonga • Voting Precinct 24, comprising regular election precincts 37, 38 Polling Place: Sycamore Villa Mobile Home Park, 8389 Baker Avenue, Cucamonga Inspector: Betty Yukech, 8651 Foothill Blvd., Cucamonga Judge: Lucille Gipson, 8389 Baker, Cucamonga Judge: Lulu Jones, 8389 Baker, Cucamonga . Clerk: Maruandia Clayton, 8488 Arrow, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 25, comprising regular election precinct 21 Polling Place: Etiwanda School, 6925 Etiwanda Avenue, Etiwanda Inspector: Carol Lombardo, 13041 Pinon Street, Etiwanda Judge: Camilla Miller, 13005 Larrera Street, Etiwanda Judge: Patricia Mathewson, 6612 Ash Avenue, Etiwanda Clerk: Sandra Barrett, 7050 Etiwanda Avenue, Etiwanda Voting Precinct 26, comprising regular election precinct 23, 24, 25, 30, 31 Polling Place: Sacred Heart Church, 12704 Foothill Blvd., Etiwanda Inspector: Delores Vennum, 7722 East Avenue, Etiwanda Judge: Betty Stevens, Etiwanda Judge: Ione Cook, 8254 Morton Avenue, Etiwanda Clerk: Ana Rankin, 13277 Miller Avenue, Etiwanda Voting Precinct 27, comprsing regular election precincts 1, 22, 26, 27, 28, 29 Polling Place: No Polling Place. • Section 3. That the compensation of the persons hereinabove named as election officers is hereby fixed at the sum of 35.00 dollars for each Inspector and 30.00 dollars for each Judge and Clerk, for said election. The rental for each of such polling places where a charge is made shall be the sum of 25.00 dollars for said election. Section 4. That the polls for said election shall be open at seven A.M. of the day of said election and shall remain open continuously from said time until eight o'clock P.M. of the same day, when said polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14301 of the Elections Code of the State of California. Section 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, said election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections in said City. Section 6. That notice of the time and place of holding said election is hereby given and the City Clerk is hereby authorized, instructed, and directed to give such further or additional notice of said election in time, form and manner as required by law. Section 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolution of said City, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. S 1980. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of ATTEST: Mayor MEMORANDUM January 980 TO: City Council City Manager FROM: Harry Empeslll, n SUBJECT: School Fees Of the school fees collected by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all but $20,000 from Olympus Pacific and $17,548 from the Alta Loma School District has been turned over to the Alta Lana School District. The monies turned over to the City by the School District can be returned to the School District quite easily. This would leave the City having to deal with only one developer, Olympus Pacific for the remaining $20,000. If the City could convince Olympus Pacific to accept a refund from the City and immediately turn the money over to the School District then the City would reduce the contingent liability to the original $38,600 that was originally turned over to the School District. Should Council so desire, the staff will proceed with negotiations with Olympus Pacific and the School District to determine if the developer would accept this method of transferring fees back to the School District. • HJE:cak i 5� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: January 16, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: LESNY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LETTER According to the letter which Lesny Development has sent to the City Council, their firm has received approval for financing of a low cost housing project and has requested that such projects be exempted from the Growth Management Plan so that they may proceed unencumbered by any of the present restrictions upon residential development. Since this request seeks a modification to the Growth Management Plan which the Planning Commission had worked on for a con- siderable period of time prior to the City Council's consideration that this item be referred to the Planning Commission for their recommendation to the City Council. Respectfully anbmit ted, AM, Director of Community Development JL: am RESOLUTION NO. 80 -7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF SAID CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO THE GENERAL LAW CITIES AND FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SAID CITY OF A CERTAIN QUESTION, MEASURE "A" RELATING TO WHETHER THE OFFICES OF CITY CLERK7AND CITY T?EASURER SHALL BE APPOINTIVE AT " " 1UNICIPAL EL° 1= .. , , •. .. ..J vV YIY'IUIIUfI. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California has called a municipal election for the Bth day of April, 1980, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga also desires to submit to the qualified electors of said City at said election the question, proposition, or measure relating to whether the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer shall be appointive hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That said City Council, pursuant to its right and authority so to do, does hereby determine that there shall be and there is hereby ordered submitted to the qualified electors of said City at said regular general municipal election the following question, to wit: 11 4U... li' Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive? YES NO A (punch mark) (cross +) placed in the voting square after the word "YES" in the manner hereinbefore provided shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the question or proposition. A (punch mark) (cross +) placed in the voting square after the word "NO" the manner hereinbefore provided shall be counted against the adoption of the question or proposition. Section 2. That for the purpose of holding said regular general municipal election, there shall be and are hereby established twenty -seven (27) voting precincts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga established for the holding of state and county elections, as said regular election precincts exist on the date of adoption of this resolution; that the polling places for the respective precincts shall be the places hereinafter designated; that the persons hereinafter named, being competent and qualified electors and residents of said City and of their respective voting precincts and they shall hold said election and make return thereof in the manner provided by law. Voting Precinct 1, comprising regular election precincts R.C. 2 Polling Place: Morgan Residence, 7990 Orchard Street, Alta Loma Inspector: Sharron Morgan, 7990 Orchard Street, Alta Loma Judge: Rose Meserole, 7975 Orchard Street, Alta Loma Judge: Renza Conger, 8155 Hillside Road Alta Loma Clerks: Percy .Smith, 7990 Orchard Street;, Alta Loma 99 7 Page 2 voting Precinct 2, comprising regular election precincts 3, Polling Place: Stork School, Jasper 6264 Street, Alta Alta Lama Inspector: Margaret Decourcey, P Judge: LaVae Stevenson, 6320 Topaz, Alta Loma Judge: Cheryl Heimbruch, 5071 Via Serena, Alta Loma Clerk :' Wanda Johnson, 8371 Pumalo, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 3, comprising regular election precinct 4 Polling Place: Vernon Residence, 5729 Napa Court, Alta Loma Inspector: Lurr Burrell, 8601 Surrey Lane, Alta Lone =ilo - -a Court, 41ra Loma Clerk: ,Ca Loma Voting Precinct 4, comprising regular election precinct 6 Polling Place: Parker Residence, 9461 Valley View Street, Alta Lama Inspector: Edith Bonnhhus,S9086 Appaloosa oAltaourt, Alta Loma Judge: Betty Case, g Alta Loma Judge: Marie Glover, 9016 Whirlaway Court, Clerk: Betty Parker, 9461 Valley View Street, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 5, comprising regular election precinct 7 Polling Place: Reese Residence, 6063 Eastwood, Alta Loma Inspector: Mary Blanchard, 9030 Manzanita Drive, Alta Loma Judge: Sandra Oerly, 5652 Emerald Court, Alta Loma Judge: Sharon Bignell, 5936 Layton Street, Alta Loma Clerk: Ruth Hutchinson, 9081 Cottonwood Way, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 6, comprising regular election precinct 8 Alta Lo Polling Place: Alta Loma Junior High School, 9000 Lemon Avenue, p+ Inspector: Marilyn Sonkoly, 6356 Garnet, Alta Loma Judge: June Whiteside, 8727 Orange Street, Alta Loma Judge: Dorothy Lacey, 6340 Sunstone, Alta Loma Clerk: Evelyn Nichols, 6355 Vineyard, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 7, comprising regular election precinct 13 Polling Place: St. Peter St. Paul Church, 9135 Ban�an,LAlta Loma Inspector: Marion Johnson, 9394 Alta Loma Drive, Judge: Aletha McLain, 9369 Lemon Avenue, Alta Lama Judge: Pauline Evans, 9358 Somerset Drive, Alta Loma Clerk: Eleanor Aranda, 6245 Beryl Avenue, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 8, comprising regular election precinct 20 Polling Place: Chaffey College, 5885 Haven Avenue, Alta Loma Inspector: Pat Jackson, 6431 Haven Avenue, Alta Loma Judge: E. Long, 6206 Mayberry, Alta Loma Judge: Judy Ott, 4571 Archibald, Alta Loma Alta Loma Clerk: Madline Shipley, 8915 Alta Loma Drive, Voting Precinct 9, comprising regular election precinct 19 Polling Place: Alta Vista Mobile Home Park, 10350 Baseline, Alta Loma Inspector: Elizabeth Hull, 6765 Mesada Street, Alta Lana Judge: Charlotte Tafoya, 10350 Baseline, Alta Loma Judge: Katherine Pearson, 9998 Monte Vista, Alta Loma Clerk: Irene Gardner, 10350 Baseline, Alta Lana 905 page 3 Voting Precinct 10, comprising regular election precinct 18 Polling Place: Alta Laguna Mobile Home Park, 10210 Baseline, Alta Loma Inspector; Minnie Heathcock, 10210 Baseline, Alta Loma Judge: Norma Howard, 10210, Baseline, Alta Loma Judge: Betty Miller, 10210 Baseline, Alta Loma Clerk: Ruth Crean, 10210 Baseline, Alta Loma Clerk: Germaine Grams, 10210 Baseline, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 11, comprising regular election precinct 17 .., Loma Judge: Ralph Dustman, 7118 Elmhurst Avenue, -Alta Loma Clerk: Kay Skinnel, 9800 Baseline, Alta Lana Voting Precinct 12, comprising regular election precinctsl5, 16 Polling Place: Chaparrel Heights Mobile Home Park, 6880 N. Archibald Avenue, Alta Loma Inspector: Marjorie Boesen, 9529 Nineteenth Street, Alta Loma Judge: Ruth Maxie, 6880 Archibald, Alta Loma Judge: Derobert Fisher, 6880 Archibald, Alta Lana Clerk: Myrtle Iles, 6880 Archibald, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 13, comprising regular election precinctsl2, 14 Polling Place: Alta Loma High School, 8880 Baseline, Alta Loma Inspector: Lorrine Walker, 9076 Baseline, Alta Loma Judge: Delores Bryan, 7090 Garnet Street, Alta Loma Judge: Joy Perdew, 7236 Hellman, Alta Loma Clerk: Bernice Rogers, 6938 Eastwood Avenue, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 14, comprising regular election precincts 10, 52 Polling Place: Carnelian Elementary School, 7105 Carnelian, Alta Loma Inspector: Dorothy Kneuer,8765 Monte Vista Street, Alta Loma Judge: Eva Hunt, 8617 Hamilton Avenue, Alta Loma Judge: Aurora Rodriguez, 6730 Opal Street, Alta Loma Clerk: Ann Parra, 6860 Topaz Street, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 15, comprising regular election precincts 9, 11, 32, 33 Polling Place: Willis Residence, 7608 Buena Vista, Cucamonga Inspector: Sally Nettle, 7723 Calle Casino, Cucamonga Judge: Lois Willis, 7608 Buena Vista, Cucamonga Judge: Rosalie Grigsby, 7547 Alta Cuesta, Cucamonga Clerk: Suzanne Speiser, 7052 Topaz Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 16, comprising regular election precincts 34, 35, 36 Polling Place: Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Baseline, Cucamonga Inspector: Ada Cooper, 8520 Red Hill Drive, Cucamonga Judge: Gladys Josund, 8537 Chula Vista Court, Cucamonga Judge: Angie Hill, 9135 Baseline, Cucamonga Clerk: Jack Hansen, 7839 Buena Vista, Cucamonga page 4 ` Voting Precinct 17, comprising regular election precincts 41, 44 Polling Place: Sweeten Hall, 9324 San Bernardino Road, Cucamonga Inspector: Mary Jenkins, 9254 San Bernardino Road, Cucamonga Judge: Mary Warda, 9673 San Bernardino Road, Cucamonga Judge: Connie Pizzuto, 9661 San Bernardino Road, Cucamonga Clerk: Jaquelyn Lewis, 9100 Hemlock Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 18, comprising regular election precincts 42, 43, 45 Polling Place: Cucamonga Fire Station, 9612 San Bernardino Roau, ,:uta�,.on. Inspector: Rnrbara Gakle, 9630 San 'ernardino Road, Cucamonc- �ouyc: Judge: Louise Wade, 9674 Balsa Street, Cucamonga Clerk: Winifred Davis, 9629 'Balsa Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 19, comprising regular election precinct 47 Polling Place: Central School, 7955 Archibald Avenue, Cucamonga Inspector: Nyla Glover, 7515 Burgundy Avenue, Cucamonga Judge: Grace Hamilton, 9762 Church Street, Ccuamonga Judge: Gladys Hawblitzel, 7334 Cambridge Avenue, Cucamonga Clerk: Pam Wright, 9560 Pepper Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 20, comprising regular election precinct 48 Polling Place: Bonella Residence, 10155 Norwick Street,Cucamonga Inspector: Lillian Connolly, 10269 Dorset Street, Cucamonga Judge: Sam Bonella, 10155 Norwick Street,Cucamonga Judge: Barbara Maxfield, 10176 Norwick Street, Cucamonga Clerk: Lucy Robinson, 10166 Norwick Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 21, comprising regular election precincts 46, 49 Polling Place: Green Residence, 8227 Layton Street, Cucamonga Inspector: Patricia Green, 8227 Layton Street, Cucamonga Judge: Mr. Green (husband) 8227 Layton Street, Cucamonga Judge: Lillian Hovey, 9798 Hampshire Street, Cucamonga Clerk: Mary Henderson, 9778 Hampshire Street, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 22, comprising regular election precincts 50, 51 Polling Place: Neighborhood Community Center, 9791 Arrow, Cucamonga Inspector: Geneviva Keith, 8949 Belmont Avenue, Cucamonga Judge: Marie Noyce, 9744 Arrow, Cucamonga Judge: Mary Leyva, 9890 Jersey Blvd„ Cucamonga Clerk: Philip Confer, 8671 Willow Drive, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 23, comprising regular election precincts 39, 40 Polling Place: Los Amigos Int, School, 8646 Baker Avenue, Cucamonga Inspector: Mary Wood, 8781 Edwin Street, Cucamonga Judge: Georgia Herron, 8236 Ninth Street, Cucamonga Judge: Herbert Kissell, 8763 Hyacinth, Cucamonga Clerk: Margaret Kissell, 8763 Hyacinth, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 24, comprising regular election precincts 37, 38 Polling Place: Sycamore Villa Mobile Home Park, 8389 Baker Avenue, Cucamonga Inspector: Betty Yukech, 8651 Foothill Blvd., Cucamonga Judge: Lucille Gipson, 8389 Baker, Cucamonga Judge: lulu Jones, 8389 Baker, Cucamonga Clerk: Maurandia Clayton, 8488 Arrow, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 25, comprising regular election precinct 21 Polling Place: Etiwanda School, 6925 Etiwanda Avenue, Etiwanda Inspector: Carol Lombardo, 130V o'— Street. Etiwanda CTmille mill—, Icry Juage: Patricia Hatnewson, 6612 Ash Avenue, Etiwanda r Clerk: Sandra Barrett, 7050 Etiwanda Avenue, Etiwanda IVoting Precinct 26, comprising regular election precinct 23, 24, 25, 30, 31 Polling Place: Sacred Heart Church, 12704 Foothill Blvd., Etiwanda Inspector: Delores Vennum. 7722 East Avenue, Etiwanda Judge: Betty Stevens, 13038 Ivy, Etiwanda Judge: Ione Cook, 8254 Morton Avenue, Etiwanda Clerk: Ana Rankin, 13277 Miller Avenue, Etiwanda Voting Precinct 27, compr'sing regular election precincts 1, 22, 26, 27, 28, 29 Polling Place: No Polling Place. Section 3. That the compensation of the persons hereinabove named as election officers is hereby fixed at the sum of 35.00 dollars for each Inspector and 30.00 dollars for each Judge and Clerk, for said election. The rental for each of such polling places where a charge is made shall be the sum of 25:00 dollars for said election. Section 4. That the polls for said election shall be open at seven A.M. of the day of said election and shall remain open continuously from said time until eight o'clock P.M. of the same day, when said polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14301 of the Elections Code of the State of California. Section 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, said election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections in said City. Section 6. That notice of the time and place of holding said election is hereby given and the City Clerk is hereby authorized, instructed, and directed to give such further or additional notice of said election in time, form and manner as required by law. Section 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolution of said City, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980. I' Mayor ATTEST: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 1980 TO: City Council & City Manager FRCMe L1nvd Huhbs, City Ennin"r SUBJECT: CITY ORDINANCE NO. 39 AMENDMENTS RELATING TO STORAGE OF VEHICLES AND THE USE OF VEHICLES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY The Sheriff's Department receives a great many calls regarding the storage of disabled vehicles on streets for long periods of time. Since adoption of Ordinance No. 39 in October 1978, this problem has been dealt with under County Code Section 52.0119, which provides for towing away the vehicles after proper warning. Article XX of City Ordinance No. 39 (Traffic Ordinance) repeals all sections of the County Code conflicting with Ordinance No. 39. Because of this, the Sheriff feels that further enforcement of Section 52.0119 is illegal and that Ordinance 39 should be amended to enable continued towing of improperl) stored vehicles. For the same reason that Section 52.0119 is considered void, Section 28.041, dealing with operation of vehicles on private property without permission, is now considered unenforceable. The problem of "dirt" vehicles being used on private lands in the City is a severe one and is difficult to control under trespassing laws alone. A provision in Ordinance No. 39 similar to Section 24.041 would enable better control of off road vehicle use by re- moving the doubt cast on the validity of Section 24.041 by Article XX of the City Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following Sections be added to City Ordinance No. 39, these sections being worded identically to Sections 52.0119 and 24.041 of the County Code: Section 12.12 Use of Streets for Storage of Vehicles Prohibited. (a) No person who owns or has possession, custody or control of any vehicle shall park such vehicle upon any street or alley for more than a consecutive period of seventy -two (72) hours. (b) In the event a vehicle is parked or left standing upon a street in excess of a consecutive period of seventy -two (72) hours, the Sheriff or any member of the Highway Patrol of the State of California may remove said vehicle from the street in the manner and subject to the requirements of the Vehicle Code. City Ordinance No. 39 Amendments Page 2 January 16, 1980 Section 9.5 Regulation of Operation of Motor Vehicles No Person shall drive a motor vehicle on any lands belonging to or occupied by another, without having, and upon request of a peace officer, displaying written permission from the owner of such lands or - - -- ` •anf! nmvidod ' over lawful business with said owner, agent or person in lawful possession. Respectfully su itted, t' t �`J Lloyd Hubbs City' ngineer LBH:deb ORDINANCE NO. 39 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 39 PERTAINING TO TRAFFIC CONTROL REGULATIONS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: as follows: Section 1: That the following sections be added to Ordinance No. 39 "Section 9.5. Reguiacion of Operation of Motor venicles. No person shall drive a motor vehicle on any lands belonging to or occupied by another, without having, and upon request of a peace officer, displaying written permission from the owner of such lands or his agent, or the person in lawful possession thereof; provided however, that this section shall not be applicable to persons having visible or lawful business with said owner, agent or person in lawful possession." 'Section 12.12. Use of Streets for Storage of Vehicles Prohibited. (a) No person who owns or has possession, custody or control of any vehicle shall park such vehicle upon any street or alley for more than a consecutive period of seventy -two (72) hours. (b) In the event a vehicle is parked or left standing upon a street in excess of a consecutive period of seventy -two (72) hours, the Sheriff or any member of the Highway Patrol of the State of California may remove said vehicle from the street in the manner and subject to the requirements of the Vehicle Code." Section 2. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daly Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Cali ornra, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ATTEST: 1 I PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of 1980. City Clerk Mayor •same -i �z+.�� c.._ :-.r L d1'is�. o�lstfias cl{. br'udy< 8715 `LZaayan .Ske«t ,At. Roma, eatifosnia 91701 January 8, 1980 Mr. Jim Frost ? W.106a 1 Mayor, city of Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga, California Dear Jim, I would like to brine to your attention the fact that SB 547, the Parkland and enewable Resources Investment Bond Issue, is ❑ow efore e Calizornia state assembly, and it must be signed by Governor Brown no later than January 24th in order to be placed on the June ballot. The measure provides 4333 million for parks and recreation and 5162 million for enhan- cement and renewal of other natural resources. It is a good possibility that at least :$3 million may be set aside for development of parks in the '.-;eat Valley Area of the County if the bond issue passes. In light of the scarcity of financial resources for park development, it seems essential that this park bond issue be passed in dune of 1980. For- tunately for this essential service, the people of California have been oassing these issues. nevertheless, it seems im- portant that we do wnatever we can to endorse the neasure. If this money were to be forthcoming to the ,vest Valley area, certainly part of it could be channeled towards the develop- ment of the Chaffey Regional Park. Perhaps the City and the County would be interested in a joint venture on this prom - isinT possibility in the future. I would appreciate it if you would brine this important issue before the City Council at its nett meeting„ and, if the Council approves, forward an endorsement in favor of SB 547 to our assemblymen. Sincerely, i January 16, 1980 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, January 16, 1980. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor James C. Frost who led in the pledge to the flag. Present: Councilmen Jon Mikels, Michael Palombo, Arthur Bridge, and Mayor James C. Frost. Also present were staff members: City Manager, Lauren Wasserman; Interim Assistant Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Senior Planner; Barry Hogan; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs. Absent: Councilman Phillip Schlosser; Finance Director, Harry Empey; Community Services Director, Bill Holley; Community Development Director, Jack Lam. Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve the January 2, 1980 minutes. Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Palombo gave a report that the League Safety Committee will have its first meeting on January 17. He briefly went over the agenda. b. The Flood Control Zone 1 will be holding a public hearing on January 17 in Chino. Mayor Frost and Councilman Bridge will be attending. c. The Foothill Freeway issue had been removed from the agenda of the California Transportation Commission meeting that was to be held in San Diego on January 25 and 26. d. City staff and council representatives will be attending the Employee Relations Institute on Wednesday and Thursday, January 23 and 24 in Los Angeles. e. Saturday, February 2 from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 N there will be a candidate's orientation to be held in the Lion's Park Community Building. f. There will be a joint Planning Commission and City Council Energy Conservation Workshop on Tuesday, February 19 to be held in the Neighborhood Facility. g. Mikels gave a report from the General Plan Advisory Committee meeting which had met on Tuesday, January 15. I h. Staff requested the following additions to the agenda: • Discussion of the revised ballot argument, "Measure A ", on whether the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer shall be appointive, to be included under item 6D. Council concurred this was okay. • Ordinance No, 39 -A. Mayor said this would be heard as item SC on the agenda. 3. COMMISSION REPORTS. a. Advisory Commission - none. b. Historical Commission - none. City Council Minutes January 16, 1980 Page 2 4. CONSENT CALENDAR. Councilman Bridge requested that item "g ", approval of alcoholic beverage license for Glenn T. Ford, The Image Bar, be removed for further discussion. a. Approval of Warrants: Registrar No. 80 -1 -19 in the amount of $297,002.09. b. Tract 9582 -2: Release of bonds to Deer Creek Company. Located north side of Wilson Avenue at Beechwood Drive. Performance Bond (water) $ 63,000 C. Tract 9602: Accept roads and release bond to Maytreyek Homes, Inc. Located on the northside of San Bernardino Road east of Carnelian. Performance Bond (road) $132,000 d. Approval and execution of the chemical weed control agreement. This agreement covers chemical weed control which was previously approved as a part of the parkway maintenance program. Ten thousand dollars were budgeted for this work and have been requested from the County. e. Parcel Map 5269: Approval of map and security offered by the developer, H 6 S Properties. Located on 4.81 acres on the north side of Hillside east of Carnelian. Letter of Credit Performance $40,500 Letter of Credit Labor S Material $40,500 RESOLUTION NO. 80 -5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 5269, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 77- 0590), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. f. Approval and execution of agreement with Sedway /Cooke for the preparation of the Industrial Specific Plan. g. Item removed for further discussion. Alcoholic Beverage License for the Image Bar. Motion; Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of item "g ". Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Discussion of Consent Calendar item "g ". Bridge said he felt the Council should discuss the issuance of the alcohol beverage license for Glenn T. Ford, the Image Bar. He said he has discussed this with people and read material about this particular place. Mayor asked if anyone in the audience was present representing the Image Bar. There was no response. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge that a denial of the alcohol beverage license permit be made to the Alcohol Beverage Control. Wasserman said that staff had sent a letter to the ABC regarding this matter. Capt. Tom Wickum of the Sheriff's Department sent the letter. Council asked Capt. Wickum if he had had any response to this letter. Capt. Wickum said that just today he had received a phone call from Mr. Peterson who stated that we were too late with our protest. Capt. Wickum said that he felt the Council should go on record not to recommend this and to send a recommendation for denial to the ABC. Motion carried by the following vote to deny the alcohol beverage license permit: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None, ABSENT; Schlosser, City Council Minutes January 16, 1980 Page 3 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 5A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 79 -05 - City of Rancho Cucamonga. Staff report by Barry Hogan. On December 19 the City Council referred the Planned Community Ordinance back to the Planning Commission for their approval of a change in language. Changes have been accomplished, and it is now before Council again for approval. Meeting opened for public hearing. There being no public response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 94, set February 6 for second reading, and waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Number and title read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO. 94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 79 -05 ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOP- MENTS. 5B. An Ordinance to extend the moratorium date on adult businesses. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. Staff had not had sufficient time to draft an ordinance regulating adult businesses, therefore, it was necessary to extend the moratorium date. The present moratorium would expire February 1. The City Attorney said he needed some direction on how Council wished to handle this matter. He said you could not stop adult businesses. Council could have them concentrated in a single area or scatter them. He needed to know what the Council wished. Mr. Hogan said this would be included in the zoning ordinance which the Planning Commission would be discussing over the next eight months. Mayor asked if August 1 would give them sufficient time. He suggested that perhaps this should be extended to December 31, 1980 and have this finalized once and for all. Council concurred. The meeting was opened for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to approve Ordinance No. 45 -B as an urgency ordinance with the extension date of December 31, 1980 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Number and title read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO. 45 -8 (urgency) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING ORDINANCE No. 45 PERTAINING TO INTERIM ZONING FOR ADULT BUSINESSES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. City Council Minutes January 16, 1980 Page 4 5C. Added item: Ordinance No. 39 -A. Staff report by Paul Rougeau. Mr. Rougeau presented the need to amend Ordinance No. 39 as it related to storage of vehicles and the use of vehicles on private property. Since the passage of Ordinance No. 39, the city's traffic ordinance, calls re- garding the storage of vehicles on streets for long periods of time have been handled under County Code Section 52.0119. However, the Sheriff felt this was illegal to try to enforce this with the County Code since Ordinance No. 39 declared this section void. It was also felt that controlling the use of "dirt" bikes on private property could also be better controlled through a city ordinance than the County Code. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve first reading of Ordinance No. 39 -A, set February 6 for second reading, and to waive entire reading. The meeting was opened for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Number and title read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO. 39 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 39 PERTAINING TO TRAFFIC CONTROL REGULATIONS. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. 6A. Discontinuation of County Road Maintenance contract. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. At the-time of execution of the 1979 -80 County contract for road maintenance, staff indicated that we were not in a position to fully evaluate the cost effective- ness of the County operation in relation to other contract options. It was recommended at that time that the Council approve the contract and direct staff to make an analysis of maintenance options. Council also authorized RJA Maintenance Contractor, Inc. to conduct a Contract Management Analysis at no cost to the City. Both RJA and staff have completed their analysis and concurred in a recommendation to discontinue the County Maintenance Contract and replace these services with a combination of City crews and private contract services. Bridge asked what plans had been made for disasters such as flood damage. How could the City cope with this if we had our own services? Hubbs said they were exploring ways to obtain additional equipment and items of maintenance that would be utilized in storm clean up with backup from local contracts. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to discontinue the County Contract for road maintenance services. Also, direct staff to notify the San Bernardino County Road Department of its intention to discontinue maintenance services as of July 30, 1980 and to make all arrangements necessary to assume those responsi- bilities through a combination of City staff and contract services. Authorize staff to solicit and receive bldg for the acquisition of patching equipment for Council review and acquisition prior to July 1, 1980. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. City Council Minutes January 16, 1980 Page 5 6B. Block Grant Funds - North Town Street Improvements. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. The City Council previously had adopted the Community Development Program for the expenditure of $15,600 in Community Development block grant funds. These funds were programmed to include street improvements and park acquisition for the develop- ment in the "North Town" area. The Citizens' Participation Advisory Committee had adopted the following priority list: Phase 1: Humbolt, 24th, 25th, 26th Streets $354,334 (est) Phase 2: Farm, Reid, Main (south side E/o Reid) $145,000 (est) Phase 3: Center and Main Streets $105,482 (est) The meeting was opened for public input. Nacho Gratis, C -Pac representative, encouraged Council to approve this priority list. Meeting was closed to further public input. Motion: Moved by Hikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve staff's recommendations as listed in Phase 1 through Phase 3 and to notify the County Community Development Department of this action to adjust the current program. Also, to authorize the amendment to the design contract to be executed by the Mayor and City Clerk for the increased design scope which will increase the contract by $12,900. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. 6C. Report re. Lesney Development Company's request for approval of Section 8 protect of 130 family apartment unite. Staff report by Barry Hogan. Lesney Development was requesting that the City Council: 1. Exempt this project from the current moratorium, and 2. Modify the growth management plan to provide priority processing for this project. Mr. Hogan recommended that this be referred to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. Meeting was opened for public input. Allan Lowy, vice President of Lesney Development, requested that Council concur with the recommendation that was made by his company. Bridge asked that Mr. Hogan's recommendation be repeated. Mr. Hogan said that if the City Council wishes to consider this item that it should be referred to the Planning Commission as an ordinance amendment. If the Council doesnot desire to have any changes made to the growth management plan or desire to hear such a change, then the Council could deal with the issue tonight. Or the Council could simply receive and file the request. Mr. Hogan stated that if this were sent to the Planning Commission with a recommenda- tion to consider an amendment to the Growth Management Plan. the earliest the Planning Commission could consider the item would be February 13, and the earliest it would be back to the Council would be March 12. Palombo said he felt the Council was not ready to review this. Mikels said he felt the Council should receive and file the request. Ken Willis, Building I,idustry Association, said this was a Federally funded project and would be of benefit to a certain class of people. City Council Minutes January 16, 1980 Page 6 Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to receive and file the request from Lesney Development Corporation. Bridge felt this should go to the Planning Commission first; however, even with priorities it could not be completed by the end of the year. Ken Willis encouraged Council to refer this back to the Planning Commission for consideration. Motion carried to receive and file the request by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. 6D, Discussion of ballot argument and adoption of Resolution. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. Mr. Wasserman presented a revised argument for Measure "A" which was to be put before the voters in the April 8, 1980 municipal election. The Measure was regarding whether the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer should be appointive. He also stated that the City Council needed to designate those by Resolution that would he authorized to submit the argument for the Measure which would be the entire Council. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve the adoption of Resolu- tion No. 80 -6 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Number and title read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS MEMBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT FOR A CITY MEASURE. The following argument was presented for consideration: Argument in Favor of Measure "A" The passage of Measure "A" will provide for the appointment of the Clerk and Treasurer by your elected City Council. At present, the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer are elective. The Clerk and Treasurer perform specific technical functions re- quired by State law. They are not policy makers for the residents, and if elected, would represent an additional bureaucratic level of government. Direct appointment by the City Council will: (1) Promote efficiency and further reduce government cost by allowing the functions of Clerk and Treasurer to be performed by existing trained City personnel. (2) Encourage the timely administration of the Clerk and Treasurer responsibilities. (3) Eliminate election expenses to the City for these offices. (4) Assure that the offices will be filled by the appointment of technically competent persons. A YES VOTE ON MEASURE "A" CONTINUES THE EFFICIENT GOVERNMENT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 1 City Council Minutes January 16, 1980 Page 7 Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve Measure "A" which had been submitted. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. 6E. A Resolution naming officers, polling places, and measures for the municipal election. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 80 -7 and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Number and title read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF SAID CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO THE GENERAL LAW CITIES AND FOR THE SUB- - MISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SAID CITY OF A CERTAIN QUESTION, MEASURE "A ", RELATING TO WHETHER THE OFFICES OF CITY CLERK AND CITY TREASURER SHALL BE APPOINTIVE, AT THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 6F. School Fee Report. Mr. Wasserman said there were still two things that needed to be worked on, and we were not ready to make a full report. This should come back at the next City Council meeting on February 6. Mr. Willis, Building Industry Association, asked if the developers could be identi- fied. He would be willing to contact these people to ask them to sign contractural letters for the release of funds. 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. None 8. NEW BUSINESS. a. Mayor read a letter from Mrs. Bridge regarding SB -547, the Parklands and Renewable Resources Investment Bond Issue, which was before the California State Assembly. She recommended that Council endorse SB -547. Council concurred that a letter should be sent to our legislators in support of SB -547. 9. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adjourn. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully bmitted, .i7ui Beverly Aulthelet Deputy City Clerk