Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980/04/02 - Agenda Packet• AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga Regular Meeting April 2, 1980 AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTE: All items submitted for the City Council agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. Pledge to flag. B. Roll call: Schlosser L, , Mikels Palombo . , Bridge �, Frost. • C. Approval of Minutes: March 5, 1980 and March 10, 1980. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. A. Advisory Commission, April 17, 1980, 6:30 p.m., Library Conference Room. B. Election Day, Tuesday, April 8, 1980. 3. REPORTS. A. Advisory Commission. B. Historical Commission. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of Warrants: Register No. 80 -4 -2 in the amount of 1 $108,107.76. 1 I City Council Agenda -2- • 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. An Ordinance Imposing Interim Ban on Material Changes to Proposed Landmarks. Ordinance No. 70 -C before Council for second reading and adoption. ORDINANCE NO. 70 -C (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE NO. 70 BY ADDING SUB- SECTION (h) THERETO TO PROHIBIT MATERIAL CHANGES ON PROPOSED LANDMARKS UNTIL FINAL ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. it B. Zane Chan a No. 80 -01 - John Isaacs. A request for a change of zone from R- to C -2 for 2.85 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Base Line and East Avenue. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Zone Change by adopting Ordinance No. 100. ORDINANCE NO. 100 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 227 - 131 -48 FROM R -1 TO C -2 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND EAST AVENUE. C. An Ordinance recoonizino and desianatina the Oso Bear statue as a City historic landmark. Report by Bill Hol ey. ORDINANCE NO. 98 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE STATUE OF OSO BEAR AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK. D. An Ordinance reco nizin and deof si na tin the Cucamon a point'0 Office as a City p Historica Interest, ORDINANCE NO. 99 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE ORIGINAL CUCAMONGA POST OFFICE SITE AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. April 2, 1980 3 4 5 18 19 19 20 20 City Council Agenda -3- April 2, 1980 • 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. Foothill Freeway Update. Staff report by Lloyd Hobbs. B. Resolution designating City Clerk to conduct canvass of ballots. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ORDERING THE CANVASS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980, TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C. Election Day Update. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 8. NEW BUSINESS. A. Council. • B. Audience. 9. ADJOURNMENT. Meeting to be adjourned to Tuesday, April 15, 1980, at 7:00 p.m. at the Lion's Park Community Center to adopt a Resolution de- claring results of the election and for the swearing -in of the candidates. • a 21 28 28 29 R867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' WARR 0 VEN R V E N D O R N A M E 64 9250 WELLS FARGO TRUSTEE 65 7985 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT S MPLOY C EEPING EN M f S 1NG 0 CP INC TS , A H TS N A SHO L SA EN CONTR OTTL ING CO INC 0 WATER GIST RINTING NSPORTATION L CORP ERPR IS ES SHEY CORP 4PIRER COJ ART 4E, GEORGE G RALPHS �S, SHIRLEY 4L TELEPHUNF CO YS INC JERRY R BLDG MATERIALS r BARRY K Y' WILLIAM L , LLOYC CONE BLDG, OFFICIAL ENGINEERS, L 0 000 ELEC INC S BERRY FARM M SIGNALS INC JACK E OF CALIF CITIES RD DAVID LLt- SANOERSON -HORN . SALLY WARR DA TE /80 DISCOUNT NET 1.123. . 63. 100. 200. 125. 2,600. 1.295. 5.230. 1.485.' 765.' 300. 300. 1,982. ,887. 377. 287. 2. 5.5 4 2, 4, 1 9 9,2 ��3 4 R867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NARR 0 VEN d V E N.0 0 R N A M E 03600 6850 L A TIMES — E E SMITH 03602 728 M 9 MG ELENNEY.R TOOLS FERN IONAL IN THE REDO ICK PLAY SWING CO ING SYSTEM ED WAY ERT INC SOCIETY 2 NAKK4180 NARR `r ISCOUNT NET DATE 1 2#292.10 145.15 5 #165.00 12.00 67.67 1#030.00 15.00 108#107.76 l • E n lJ • M E M O R A N D U M TO: William L. Holley, Director of Community Services FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney DATE: February 14, 1960 RE: Ordinance Imposing Interim Ban on Material Changes to Proposed Landmarks. Enclosed please find an Ordinance which would impose an interim ban on material changes to a proposed landmark. This is the strongest possible measure, and it has been drafted as such per your suggestion. Should the Historic Preservation Commission wish it watered down, please advise. • It is not necessary to put notification procedures in the Ordinance. I believe that you should just set up an in- house procedure for notifying owners, occupants and appropriate City departments of the proposed designation and the provisions of the Ordinance prohibiting material change. RED:sgg Enclosure 0 3 ORDINANCE NO. 10 -C • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE NO. 70 BY ADDING SUB- SECTION (h) THERETO TO PROHIBIT MATERIAL CHANGES ON PROPOSED LANDMARKS UNTIL FINAL ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 10 of Ordinance No. 70 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended by adding sub- section (h) thereto to read as follows: "(h) Except as otherwise provided in Section 16 of this Ordinance, it shall be unlawful for any person to carry out or cause to be carried out a material change on a proposed landmark until final action of the City Council, denying the proposed designation, is taken. ". SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Cler shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published inn the City T -Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ATTEST: \J PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk Mayor • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Dare: April 2, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development By: Dan Coleman, Junior Planner Subject: ZONE CHANGE N0. 80 -01 - JOHN 1SAACS - A request for a change of zone from R -1 to C -2 for 2.85 acres of land located at the north- west corner of Base Line and East Avenue BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of March 12, 1980, held a public hearing to consider the atove zone change and recommended approval by the City Council as indicated on the attached Resolution. The applicant is requesting approval to change the zone from R -1 (single family residential) to C -2 (general business commercial) on 2.85 acres of land • located at the northwest corner of Base Line and East Avenue (Exhibit "A "). The applicant is proposing to develop this area as a service station center Including a garage and convenience market. ANALYSIS: The site is bounded on all sides by roadways and the freeway off - ramp. The subject property is currently zoned R -1 and vacant. Exhibits "B" and "C" indicate existing adjacent land use and zoning which is described as follows: Land Use Zoning North Vacant R -1 South Vacant R -1 East Vacant R -1 West Greenhouses R -1 Exhibit "D" displays the General Plan land use designations for adjacent pro- perties. The General Plan indicates this area for development as service commercial. The proposed zone change is consistent with the proposed General Plan and the site is suitahi,e in size and shape to accommodate the uses per- mitted in the proposed zone. The uses permitted in said zone are compatible with adjacent land uses and future development in the immediate area. Further, adjacent streets are designed to accommodate uses that would be permitted in the proposed zone. 11 Zone Change No. 80 -01 April 2, 1980 Page 2 A notice of public hearing was published in the Daily Report on March 24, 1980. In addition, notice of said hearing was mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Zone Change No. 80 -01 by adopting the attached Ordinance. Reypectfull submitted, JACK LAM, Direct r'oE Community Development JL:DC:nm Attachments: Exhibits "A ", "B ", "C" and "D" Initial Study Resolution No. 80 -09 • City Council Ordinance I 0 n u • S. P FAILROAD oFF 1t� 5U5JEcr PROPERTY D LI NE 70t IU 5.P MILROAU VAC ^)tt T.1HI:� tv�±c!t.3Nii l,o�Ttlf v!�[PrJri FEar S vWlIFr off V!v/ plr h O 5UBJEcr PRAPERTi BASE d p, v zO HF CHAW -)l . NO. ?)0 -01 XI�'Tll i LA(,L) UhC m"w g . LYMbIT „6 i \W NF F" . L-A 0 0 S.P RAILROAD P -1 F� I K-I 5UBJECT PROPERTY Of 7_c'�Ilf: Cllnllr;[:r HO Ex15TIf i( 7_DHIIlll� 5*11 F IT "G„ S.P RAILROAD WI I n A-ZET'? V; f 11\11� m RVIGV • z w Cr�MMFF�GIAL� 04 p,�P ID 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and taKe action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. • PROJECT TITLE: Service Station Center for Mr, .John Isaacs APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Mr. .John Isaacs 8687 Baseline Read. Rambo Cucamonga, California 71730 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Nr. 1'nm 11mig Shcldmi L. Pollack Cnrn°ra- tion. 1938 Wilshire Itoulrvard, Las Angrlos, CA 90010 (213) 383 -1212 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Pnrrol No, 227 - 111 -48 N.W. rnrflnr of 8:n;n1 hw IG,aJ and I:avt Avemw LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: hnr.al Itnildinr po rmir - -- u I -1 a 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION • e DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: see attached Sheet .71 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Approximately 2.85 Acres. Vacant Site. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMFPMAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): sec nllncueu sllaei nz f Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? ❑n I- 2 _..... 12 IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnishe above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my Y.nowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date Signature Signature i • Title Tem IIun9 Iy Pro inet M,•qi, r.•r `.lip T. -a e WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 'e x 1. create a substantial change in ground _ contours? x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration! -9 a 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, vp sewage, etc.)! K 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? A 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? IS 6. Create the need for use or disposal of _ _ potentially hazardous materials such as <S toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: 2. Noiso normnlly nssocintud with t'ommeryial use. 3. Services normull%: associated with commercial nse. _ '>-. ". vin nP•e to eommercia zone in accur nnce w ti general p an. A number ot trees vili he removed, however are to be repince by healthier trees of size and variet•: more appropriate to the develepmo.nt. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnishe above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my Y.nowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date Signature Signature i • Title Tem IIun9 Iy Pro inet M,•qi, r.•r `.lip T. -a si IJ f 1. An automobile service station center which consists of the following: • a. A 2 -story 4,850 S.F, office for the service stations use with part of the 1st floor as Tire and Battery and Auto Accessory show room. b. A 3,000 S.F. service garage for mechanical service. c. A 4,750 S.F. convenience market and public washroom facilities. d. 4 covered service islands for gasoline pumps. e. An aviary area for birds display. f. Station identification sign for freeway and local expnsnres. (Plans of sign shall be submitted on later date to Ci1.y for approval prior to con- struction.) g. Surface parking of 51 cars. l4 • • 511171' 02 • The site of approximately 2.65 acres is freeway oriented to the newly opened route from the San Bernardino Freewav to Barstow. The essentially flat terrain is currently in a rural setting with adjoining properties as yet undeveloped. The rear of the site adjoins the freeway off ramp in a curving line. The front and side of the site forms the N.W. corner of Baseline Road and Fast Avenue. The site is of substantial distance from other commercial development on these streets, however, future development may be anticipated due to free- way access and related commercial development. Some native Eucalyptus trees are currently located on the site, some of which will be caved in the development and or replaced with new trees of appropriate size and species. The site in itself has no special historical significance and no special animal habitat other than small rodents and other local typical species. • • 1S RESOLUTION NO. 80 -09 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -01 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R-1 TO C -2 FOR 2.85 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND EAST AVENUE - ASSESSORS PARCEL N0, 227 - 131 -48 WHEREAS, on the 25th day of January, 1980, an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of March, 1980, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION I: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: I. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have signifi- • cant impact on the environment nor the surround- ing properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adversa impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on March 12, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Coimmi scion of [he City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 12th day of March, 1980, Zone Change No. 80 -01. 2, The Planning ,Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 80 -01. • • r • • 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY MARCH, 1980 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. By Herman Rempel, Chairman / ATTEST.: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and • regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of March, 1980, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, TOLSTOY, JONES, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS NONE 9 17 ORDINANCE NO. 100 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 227- 131 -48 FROM R -1 TO C -2 LOCATED ON THE NORTH- WEST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND EAST AVENUE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental • impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly, R -1 (single family residential) to C -2 (general business commercial) Said property is located on the northwest corner of Base Line and East Avenue known as Assessor's Parcel Number 227- 131 -48. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its adoption. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this µ _ day of 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: u ORDINANCE No. 98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE STATUE OF OSO BEAR AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordian as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that the Statue of Oso Bear has met the criteria established in Ordinance No. 70 for the Historic Preservation, and therefore, and with the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates it as a Historic Landmark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (1S) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: 0 City Clerk • ORDINANCE No. 99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE ORIGINAL CUCAMONGA POST OFFICE SITE AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that the original Cucamonga Post Office Site has met the criteria established by Ordinance No. 70 -B for Historic Preservation, and therefore, and with the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates the original Cucamonga Post Office Site as a Historic Point of Interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily �Re Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City o —Ontario, rio, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: April 2, 1980 TO: City Council & City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: FOOTHILL FREEWAY STUDY Attached for Council review is a summary of the Consultant's report to the State Transportation Committee on the Foothill Freeway study. The report basically recommends the phased construction of the Freeway, but that the burden of funding should be placed with the local agencies. It is recommended that a local authority be established within the next two years to developing the funding mechanism. During this time, the State would protect the right of way. If after two years the local agencies have not developed the funding tools, the right of way will be sold and the route rescinded. • Staff will be meeting with other agency officials during the coming weeks to explore the local options. The full Consultant report will be transmitted to the Council. Respectfully submitted, Lloyd" Hubb City ngineer LBH:deb i 1 21 Consultants' arryft 4arch 26, 1980 Review Copy , u SUMMARY The proposed Route 30 Freeway (also referred to as the Foothill Freeway) would run almost directly east from the current ter- minus of Interstate 210 in the City of La Verne to the connec- tion of Interstate ISE and Route 30 in the City of San Bernardino, thirty miles to the east (See Figure I -1). This proposed facility has been part of California's freeway and expressway plans since the early 1950s. In January of 1979, the California Department of Transportation proposed to the California Transportation Com- mission that the route for this facility be rescinded. In effect, the Foothill Freeway would be eliminated as a proposed part of the freeway and expressway system. The Commission retained Angus McDonald s Associates, Inc., in association with Alan M. Voorhees 6 Associates, to advise them on a decision of whether or not to rescind Route 30. The con- sulting team was to recommend the transportation facility, if any, that should be constructed in the corridor. The evaluation was to consider travel demands and transportation requirements, but it was also to consider the financial feasibility of alter- natives. A total of eleven transportation alternatives was • considered, ranging from a literal "no- build" alternative to a full freeway the entire length of the corridor. Significantly improved transit service and emphasis on high occupancy vehicle lanes were included in some of the alternatives. The following recommendations constitute an independent evaluation of available data by the consulting team and an independent judg- ment of the transportation facility that would be both respon- sive to future travel demand in the corridor and financially , feasible, given competing demands for scarce financial resources. A. Conclusions The recommendation for a Route 30 facility is based on the following conclusions. The existing street, highway, and transit network in the corridor is able to serve existing demand. Any requirement for increased capacity is in response to new demand generated by new land uses. Of some importance, the local governments in the Route 30 corridor and the Southern California Association of Governments (the com- prehensive planning agency for the Southern California region) have adopted growth policies that call for a relatively high rate of growth in the corridor between now and the year 2000. The consultants did not identify any aspects of the local and • 122 • • • Consultants' Draft March 26, 1980 Review Cooy 7 y T7 a 0 Z 6 � � z ♦•.. I I e > I = r I r I B I O O U " M ao0 d 2 23 consultants' Draft March 26, 1990 Review Copy • regional growth policies that were at variance with objectives or policies of the Commission. Because growth in the corridor is sanctioned both by the local governments and by the regional planning agency, any infra- structure Gncluding a transportation facility) that provides increased capacity not in excess of the growth targets should be considered to be growth accommodating rather than growth inducing. The planned growth will generate demand for east -west trans- portation capacity in excess of existing capacity on state high- ways and city streets. Nonetheless, even in the yeas' 2000, existing state routes (Interstate 10 and Route 60) would more than ac- commodate trips that begin outside the corridor, end outside the corridor, or both. Accordingly, the demand for new capacity is generated by local rather than interregional travel. Careful consideration was given to decreasing vehicle demand by two measures: • Improving transit service; • Providing high occupancy vehicle (ROV) lanes on • Route 30 and Interstate 10. Overall, the most optimistic reduction in vehicle demand that could result from these measures was not sufficient to change the robustness of the conclusion. Reduction in demand due to increases in the price of oil was more significant than both improved transit and provision of ROV lanes together. Requirements for additional capacity were estimated under three alternative assumptions about the cost of oil: • A baseline case where prices remain at 1978 levels; • A case equivalent to the California Energy Commission's "most likely" scenario, where prices increase 220 percent (in real dollar terms) by the year 2000; • A case equivalent to the Energy Commission's "high" scenario where prices increase 380 percent by the year 2000. The estimated reduction in travel demand in response to in- creased oil prices led to three different conclusions about additional highway capacity that would be required by the year 2000. 3 2# Consultants' Draft Parch 26, 1980 a Review copy • Under the base case, a six -lane freeway would be required from La Verne to a point somewhat east of Euclid Avenue in Upland. From there, a four -lane freeway would be sufficient to a point near Haven Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. A four -land arterial would be sufficient for the remainder of the corridor. Under the most likely oil cost scenario, a four -lane freeway or parkeway would be required from La Verne to a point between Euclid and Archibald Avenues in Rancho Cucamonga. A four -lane arterial would be sufficient for the remainder of the corridor. Under the high oil cost scenario, travel demand was estimated to drop to the point that a four -lane arterial would be sufficient the entire length of the corridor. An additional and important conclusion emerged from the analysis. A four -lane arterial would provide sufficient capacity through the year 1990 under all three oil price scenarios. A review of the financial feasibility of the alternatives led to the conclusion that conventional financing for any facility from the state highway account is undependable and quite un- likely. There is an eighteen-year backlog of projects where a • problem already exists or where existing demand is not being accommodated. Further, the real dollar purchasing power of the state highway account is declining markedly because the major source of revenue -- the gas tax -- is not indexed for inflation. H. The Recommendation The consultants recommend that the Commission deal with the proposed Route 30 facility in a way that differs from the "either /or" decision to rescind. The consultants recommend that the Commission consider Route 30 as an example of circumstances where: • New facilities are justified by new demand rather than by existing conditions; • There is a long history of state involvement and a Possibility that there will be continued state in- volvement; • A degree of statewide concern about a facility does not necessarily mean that construction and operation should be entirely a state responsibility. Under these conditions, appropriate actions for the Commission is would be: Consultants' Draft xarch 26, 1980 ' seview Copy • To continue to protect the right -o£ -way for two years while the local governments in the corridor have the opportunity to establish an appropriate governmental entity and implement a plan to finance new capacity, using growth- related fees or some other locally adopted financing mechanism; To cause the right -of -way now owned by the state to be sold according to established procedures, if a realistic financing plan has not been adopted at the end of this two -year period; To make available to local governments the consultants' recommendations for implementation. The consultant's recommendations for implementation call for long term preservation of the entire proposed right -of -way, with acquisition at the appropriate time. A staged facility would be built that is first constructed as a four -lane con- trolled access "arterial" at the western terminus of the corridor. over time, as demand increased, expanded capacity would be obtained in two ways. First, the facility would be extended • in the eastern direction to accommodate new planned development. At the same time, capacity could be added by gradually expanding the capacity of already- constructed links in the new system. The original arterial would be expanded to expressway standards at the point where demand justified the investment. At -grade crossings could be eliminated selectively, and overcrossings and interchanges could be constructed. An initial analysis indicates that both "longitudinal" (i.e., from east to west) and "lateral" (from arterial to expressway, and ultimately to freeway) expansion could be staged over time without gross inefficiencies, provided that provisions for ex- pansion were included from the beginning of the design process. A minimum initial requirement would be controlled access to the facility from the outset, even while it was built as a four -lane arterial. (This requirement for controlled access means that the initial links are not,strictly speaking, "arterials" as that term is used by the California Department of Transportation.) The Commission, by its action, should not preclude an eventual statewide role as a participant in the operation and maintenance of the new facility. As a practical necessity, capital facilities will increasingly be financed from the direct generator of demand -- growth and development in an area. Recardinq Cape- J ' 26 Consultants' Draft ` March 26, 1980 Review Copy • • • city to finance ongoing operations (e.g., maintenance, transit deficits), the future is less certain. It may emerge that the state is more able than local governments to finance ongoing operations_ By an action to de -fine financial responsibility for constructing the Route 30 facility as a local responsibility, the Commission should not be eliminating permanently the option of state participation in ongoing operations. A financing plan for operations and maintenance (including financing the deficit for any transit improvements) should be prepared and agreed upon during the two -year period in which a local financing/ constructing authority is being established. Z( RESOLUTION NO. 80 -31 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CANVASS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980, TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, a regular general municipal election will be held and conducted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, on Tuesday, the 8th day of April, 1980, as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council of said City desires the canvass of said election to be made by the City Clerk of said City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 22932.5 of the Elections Code of the State of California, the canvass of the regular general municipal election to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, on Tuesday, the 8th day of April, 1980, is hereby ordered to be made by the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • SECTION 2. That the City Clerk of said City shall prior to the 15th day of April, 1980, complete the canvass of the regular general municipal election to be held in said City on the 8th day of April, 1980, and shall certify the results to this said City Council on the 15th day of April, 1980. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City, and shall make a minute of the pass- age and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. SECTION 4. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 0 James C. Frost, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman. City r.ler� 2S' • MEMORANDUM DATE: March 27, 1980 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren M . Wassenffln City Manager SUBJECT: Election EveU ote Counting As the City Council is aware, Rancho Cucamonga is one of four Cities participating in a regional counting center for tallying of election day ballots. As precinct workers return the ballot boxes to the Lion's Park Community Building, the ballots will be relayed to the Upland City Hall in a police vehicle with a deputy and a deputized election worker from the City. Upon arrival at the Upland City Hall, votes will be processed and tallied via a computer counting system which will count the ballots at the rate of 1,000 per minute. The first tally will be the absentee ballots which may be counted after 8:00 p.m. on election eve. Then as precinct workers begin returning ballots to the City Hall, they will be dispatched to Upland for counting. It is significant to note-that as soon as votes have been tallied, the results will be relayed to Lion's Park and will be announced and posted immediately. Persons interested in viewing the election night procedure may do so at the Upland City Hall and at Lions Park. There are, however, some areas which are considered to be high security and the public is not allowed to visit in those areas. The areas may be observed from a distance however. In summary we are looking forward to a prompt tally of all votes regarding the positions for City Council, City Clerk, City Treasurer and Ballot Issue A. LMW /vz • 2? 1 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 28, 1980 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Patch Truck Acquislti on Per prior Council approval, bids were solicited and received on March 26, 1980 for one Tilt Cab Truck and Chassis to be used as an A.C. Patch Truck.Three valid bids were received and are shown on the attached bid summary. The truck will be received 120 days from issuance of the purchase order. Because of the long delivery time, it is important that this order be issued as soon as possible. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Finance Director to purchase one Tilt Cab Truck and Chassis, as specified, from Transwest Ford Truck Sales, Inc., Fontana, California at the bid price of $21,155.00 Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVIA ION i Llo. Hubbs, City Engineer LBH /ctr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 2, 1980 TO: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer FROM: Dave Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor SUBJECT: BIDS ON PATCH TRUCK CHASSIS On March 26, 1980, bids were opened for one tilt -cab truck and chassis. The bids were as follows: Ray Gaskin $28,660.00 Camnentia Ford $24,011.90 Transwest Ford $21,155.00 Transwest Ford offered the lowest bid and the most expediant delivery time of 120 days, to have the equipment ready for the July 30, 1980 takeover of main- tenance by the City. It is recommended that Transwest be awarded the contract. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJECT One Tilt Cab Truk and Chassis _ DATE March 26 1980 CONTRACT NO. LOCATION ITets QUANTITIES Carmenita Ford Transwest Ford Ray Gaskin Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Amoun[ Bid Amount Bid Amount Bidder's Bond Tilt Cab Truck & Chassis 1 EA NO DELIVERY 24,011.90 TIME 120 DAY3 21,155.00 DELIVERY 150 DAYS 28,660.00 DELIVERY r"q"3-s UST F©2�) RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA PROPOSAL FOR ONE TILT CAB TRUCK AND CHASSIS Bids must be submitted by 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1980, at which time they will be publicly opened. March 4, 1980 ENGINEERING DIVISION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9340 BASE LINE, SUITE 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91701 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BIDDERS NOTICE THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILL RECIEVE BIDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF one (1) tilt cab truck and chassis IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS CALLED OUT BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION. BIDS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 2:00 P.M. ON March 26, 1980 BIDS WILL BE OPEN AT 2:00 P.M. ON THIS DATE. COPIES OF SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM ENGINEERING DIVISION, 9340 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91701, BIDS MUST BE SUBMITTED ON CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BID FORMS AND PLACED IN A SEALED ENVELOPE AND ADDRESSED: CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, POST OFFICE BOX 793, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 AND NARKED CLEARLY "BID for Qne (1) tiIt cab truck and chassis __ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY AND /OR ALI. BIDS SUBMITTED. PUBLISHED t - BIDDER'S STATEMENT THE BIDDER HEREBY AGREES TO PROVIDE THE EQUIPMENT AND /OR MATERIAL DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS WITHIN 3& CALENDAR DAYS FROM AWARD OF BID. 120 THE BIDDER ALSO AGREES TO EXTEND PRICE PROTECTION FOR THE BID FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS. THE BIDDER FURTHER AGREES THAT PRICE ESCALATIONS BEYOND THE PERIOD OF PRICE PROTECTION SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CITY AT MANUFACTURER'S INVOICE COST. THE CITY HEREBY AGREES TO MAKE PAYMENT AT BIDDER'S COST FOR ALL GOVERNMENT MANDATED EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS ENACTED AFTER THE AWARD OF BIDS WHICH AFFECT THE BIDDER'S ABILITY TO SUPPLY THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT. SIGNED I_ ti =(,nom Donovan L. Craie �- INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California ......................County of.. San. Bernardino S.S. ........... . ................... a M ,P .: On this......... 24 .............day of ............ Maroh ...... ..... 19.�.., before me, the undersigned allonry Public in and for said . San . . .. Be . rnardino County, .................................................. ......................... . ............. JM", EAL) personally appeared...... Donovan, L.. Crai. G ............................................ ............................... } (? c ............................................................................................................... ............................... r. F known to me to be the person...... whose name.......... ......... ......................subxribed to the within a instrument, and acowledged that ...... hn....."lured the same. �s WITN my hand an cial seal. L 11 i �': ?< / ,�.L�.d .... �Ci^ .:...................... ............................... .... +Y: .y Notary San Bzrnardino Non Public in and for said... .........` ..................... ..........................County and Slate r isr 1.78 My commission expiresinril ..l ................ 19p... 5 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING 9340 BASE LINE, SUITE B RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91701 BIOS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 2:00 P.M. AND WILL BE OPENED AT THAT TIME. ON March 26, 1980 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 HONORABLE COUNCIL: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ESTABLISHED SPECIFICATIONS, THE UNDERSIGNED BIDDER AGREES TO RPOVIDE THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WITH one (1) tilt cab truck and chassis AT THE FOLLOWING PRICE, INCLUDING SALES TAX. 810 PRICE TO BE EXCLUSIVE OF FEDERAI. EXCISE SAX. One (1 milt cab trn�k a_n_d_cha osic E 21, J:55, on ITEM 1Yans -Mast Ford Truck Snl(�5 Inc. COIdPANt 10150 Cherry Avenue AUORE-s�- _ ront;ma CA "2335 BY: /}ii- r.-... llnnrnan L. �rni • 1. Year: 2. Condition: 3. Gross vehicle weight: 4. Front axle: 5. Rear axle: 6. Front springs: 7. Rear springs: B. Wheel base: 9. Wheels: 10. Radiator: 11. Engine: 12. Fuel Tank: 13. Transmission: 14. Steering: 15. Frame: 16. Service brakes: 17. Parking brakes: 18. Electrical: 19. Cab: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIFICATION FOR tilt cab truck and chassis 1980 new not less than 27,500 lb. not less than 9,000 lb. not less than 18,500 lb. not less than 4,040/4,500 each side not less than 10,000 /11,000 each side 111 inches 7 each 10 x 20 12 ply tires mounted on 10 hole Budd rims, 6 only to be mount- ed on the vehicle heavy duty extra cooling diesel Cat 3208, 175 HP 50 gallon steel tank mounted on the left side Allison AT540 with Hayden cooler power 537,000 RBM double channel vacuum assisted heavy duty hydraulic system with vacuum tank, gauge and warning light lever operated 70 amperes alternator and three (3) 475CCA batteries dual sun visors, full bench seats, cab assist handles right and left sides, 2 speed wipers, left and right 6" by 16" west coast type with 8" auxillary proximity spot mirrors, three speed fresh air heater- defroster, and oil pressure and engine temperature instrumentation 1!940 Nely 'L7 ,5(x1 9,000 1£,500 4040/4500 10,000/11,000 Qx!mlies Extm rmlin4 175 !tn Crnmlies r...,.o 4..e Crnmlies C<rmlies CaMl iee Complies emn1fil., -- Crnmlies rcrml Sec 20. Color: 21. Manuals: 22. Deliver to Cab shall be white, chassis and Cmnlies wheels shall be black cmnlios 2 Operators and 1 parts Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 793 9340 Base Line, Unit B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 (714) 989 -1851 22: Delivery Date: 120 Pays April 2, 1980 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINTUES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, April 2, 1980. The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Mayor James C. Frost who led in the pledge to the flag. Present: Councilmen Phillip Schlosser, Jon Mikels, Michael Palombo, Arthur Bridge, and Mayor James C. Frost. Also present were: Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Assistant City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Absent: City Manager, Lauren Wasserman. Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve the minutes of March 5, 1980. Motion carried 5 -0. 14=112 KIP1141.IfN`,Mi-1 a. Special Olympics will be held on April 12 at Montclair High School starting at 9:00 a.m. b. Mikels said that the emergency gas allocation plan which SCAG had been asked to become a part of would be discussed at the April 3 SCAG Executive Committee meeting. They expected some controversy from the cities. c. April 8, at 1:30 p.m. there will be a "press preview" of the election night procedure for the counting of ballots at Upland City Hall. d. Staff requested that item 6D be added to the city manager's staff reports Acquisition of a patch truck. e. The grate has been installed over the flood control opening at Banyan and Sapphire as requested by Council at the March 19 meting. The total coat for the project was $2400. 3. COMMISSION REPORTS. A. Advisory Commission. There were none. B. Historical Commission. Mr. Gorczyca, Chairman, announced that the next Historical Commission meeting would be May 13. At this time they will be dis- cussing the Garrett Company, or better known as the Virginia Dare Winery designations. He said that on April 8 they would be meeting with some Garrett representatives to hear what they would like to do with the property. Palombo said he had some information regarding this property, and perhaps he and Councilman Mikels could meet with Mr. Gorczyca at some time. Y i. City Council Minutes April 2, 1980 Page 2 4. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of warrants: Register No. 80 -4 -2 in the amount of $108,107.76. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried 5 -0. 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS. 5A._ An Ordinance imposing interim ban on material changes to proposed historical landmarks. Staff report by Bill Holley. Meeting was opened for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to approve Ordinance No. 70 -C and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title read by Beverly Authelet. ORDINANCE NO. 70 -C (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE NO. 70 BY ADDING SUBSECTION (h) THERETO TO PROHIBIT MATERIAL CHANGES ON PROPOSED LANDMARKS UNTIL FINAL ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. 5B. Zone Change No. 80 -01 - John Isaacs. Staff report by Jack I=. A request for a change of zone from R -1 to C -2 For 2.85 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Base Line and East Avenue. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to approve the introduction of Ordinance No. 100, set April 16 for second reading and adoption, and to waive entire reading. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schloss¢.., Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Title and number read by Authelet. ORDINANCE NO. 100 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 227- 131 -48 FROM R -1 to C -2 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND EAST AVENUE. 5C. An Ordinance recognizing and designating the Oso Bear statue as a City historic landmark. Staff report by Bill Holley. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. Mr. Gorczyca said the Bear would be the first official historical landmark designation by .the City of Rancho Cucamonga which has received no historical designation from any other source. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the introduction of Ordinance No. 98, set April 16 for second reading and adoption, and to waive entire City Council Minutes April 2, 1980 Page 3 reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title read by Authelet. ORDINANCE NO. 98 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE STATUE OF ONO BEAR AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK. 5D. An Ordinance recognizing and designating the Cucamonga Post Office as a City point of historical interest. Staff report by Bill Holley. The mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the introduction of Ordinance No. 99, set April 16 for second reading and adoption, and waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title read by Authelet. ORDINANCE NO. 99 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE ORIGINAL CUCAMONGA POST OFFICE SITE AS A SIGNI- FICANT HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. 6A. Foothill Freeway Update. Mr. Hubbs presented a summary of the consultant's report on the Foothill Freeway. Bridge said that there was some merit on the phased construction as outlined by the consultant', however, he was definitely against the levying of any fees on structures to finance the freeway. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to receive and file the consultant's report. Motion carried 5 -0. 6B. Resolution designating the city clerk to conduct the official canvass follow- ing the election. Staff report by Jim Robinson. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution No. 80 -31 and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title read by Authelet. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CANVASS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE NTH DAY OF APRIL, 1980, TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 6C. Election Day Update. Staff report by Jim Robinson. Mr. Robinson presented an oral report giving the Council an update of the schedule City Council Minutes April 2, 1980 Page G for the day of the election and what would be taking place at the Lion's Park Community Center which was to be the base for Rancho Cucamonga. The central counting center would be at Upland City Hall. However, the results would be called in to Lion's Park and announced to the public from -here. 6D. Added item: Request for acquisition of a patch truck. Staff report by Lloyd Hobbs. Staff had solicited and received bids on a patch truck per Council's direction. Three bids had been received for one tilt cab truck and chassis to be used as an A.C. patch truck. Low bidder was from Transwest Ford Truck Sales, Inc. of Fontana at $21,155.00. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve the purchase of one tilt cab truck and chassis from Transwest Ford Truck Sales of Fontana at a cost not to exceed $21,155.00. Motion carried 5 -0. 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none. S. NEW BUSINESS. a. April 26 — the Cucamonga County Water District would be dedicating a new processing plant. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Schlosser to direct staff to draft a commendation from the city. Motion carried 5 -0. b. Mayor commended the Sheriff's Department and staff for the work that they did in the Image Bar situation which brought about it being closed. 9. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to adjourn meeting to Tuesday, April 15, at 7:00 p.m. at the Lion's Park Community Center to declare election results , for the administering of oaths of office, and the appointments of Mayor and Mayor pro -tem. Meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, �.'P -Be.F CCt.f 4A,C.l-- Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk