HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980/05/07 - Agenda PacketA G E N D A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM04GA
Lion's Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga
Regular Meeting
May 7, 1980
AGENDA ITEMS: -- NOTE: All items submitted for the City Council agenda must be
in writing. The deadline for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday prior
to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office re-
ceived all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
A. Plege to Flag. i r I''
B. Roll Call: Frost_, Mikels Palumbo Bridge_, Schlosser_
. C. Approval of Minutes: March 19, 1980; April 2, 1980; April 15, 1090;
and April 16, 1980.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
a. General Plan Advisory Committee meeting at Neighborhood Facility,
9171 Arrow, Saturday, May 10, at 9:00 a.m.
b. Traffic Committee, Tuesday,May 13, at 2:30 p.m. in City Mall Conference
Room.
C. Council Committee Assignments.
3. COMMISSION REPORTS.
A. Advisory Commission.
B. Historical Commission.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR.
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- contro-
ver<rial. They will be acted upon by the Council an one time without discussion.
Any CounJii member, staff members, or interested party may request that an
item be removed trom the Consent Calendar for later discussion.
a. Approval of warrants: Register No. 80 -5 -7 for $718,344.68. 1 —
City Council Agenda -2- May
7, 1980
6
. b.
Authorization for Community Services Director to attend
Legislative Conference and Federal Aid Briefing on
May 14 and 15 in Sacramento. Cost: not to exceed
$200.
7
C.
Refer late claim by Robert Glen Gregory in the amount of
$75,000 to City Attorney for handling.
12
d.
Refer claim by Candy J. Cannon and Bill Cannon to the
City Attorney for handling.
23
e.
Refer claim by Ed. Rogerson in the amount of $520.84 to
the City Attorney for handling.
f.
Refer late claim by Jesse Albert Cruz to the City
27
Attorney for handling.
39
g.
Refer claim by Lesney Development to the City Attorney _
for handling.
42
h.
Approval of alcoholic beverage license by Daniel B.
Milliken, Margaret F. Millikeq for on -sale beer license
at the La Mancha, 10495 Arrow Highway.
i.
Release of bonds:
•
Tract 6866: Located at the southeast corner of State Highway
30 and Beryl Street. Owner: Griffin Development Co.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $100,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) 50,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) 20,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) 33,500
Tr.ior 9214: Located at the northeast corner of Ramona Avenue
and Victoria Street. Owner: C/D Development Co.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $ 30,000
Labor S Material Bond (road) 15,000
Labor a Material Bond (water) 8,500
Tr, r 9 6: Located north of Sixth Street between Archibald
and Hellman Avenuees. Owner: Walton Associated Companies, dba
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $100,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) 50,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (on -site sewer) 11,500
Labor S Material Bond (off -site sewer) 3,500
Labor b Material Bond (water) 17,500
Is
City Council Agenda
-3-
May 7, 1980
Tract 9245: Located on the west side
of Haven Avenue between
_
19th Street and the Southern Pacific Railroad tracts. Owner:
Lewis Homes of California.
Labor
Labor 6 Material Bond
(road)
$ 61,000
Labor & Material Bond
(sewer)
11,000
Labor & Material Bond
(on -site water)
14,000
Labor & Material Bond
(off -site water)
12,500
Tract 9254: Located
on the northwest
corner of Archibald Avenue
and Highland Avenue.
Owner: Walton /Lundstrom
- Alta Loma.
Labor & Material Bond
(road)
$ 69,000
10
Tract 9255: Located on the north side of 6th Street between Hellman
Avenue and Archibald Avenue. Owner: Lusk - Walton Cucamonga, a
Partnership.
Labor & Material Bond (road) $ 50,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) 17,000
Labor & Material Bond (water) 15,500
Tract 9260: Located on the southwest corner of 19th Street and
Archibald Avenue. Owner: Thompason 6 Assoc.
Faithful Performance
Bond (road)
$150,000
Labor
& Material Bond
(road)
75,000
Labor
& Material Bond
(sewer)
12,000
Labor
& Material Bond
(water)
18,000
Tract
9274: Located
on west side of Hellman Avenue and north of
Arrow
Route, Owner:
M. J. Brock and Sons.
Labor
& Material Bond
(road)
$ 86,000
Labor
& Material Bond
(sewer)
24,000
Labor
& Material Bond
(on -site water)
27,000
Labor
& Material Bond
(off -site water)
6,500
1'ract
9280: Located
between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street at
Monte
Vista Street.
Owner: Bob Jensen
Builder, Inc.
Labor & Material (road)
Labor & Material (sewer)
Labor & Material (water)
$ 72,000
19,000
27,500
Tract 9287; Located at northeast corner of Lemon Avenue and
Carnelian Street. Owner: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $116,000
Labor & Material Bond (road) 58,000
Labor & Material Bond (sewer) 20,500
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) 20,000
City Council Agenda -4- May 7, 1980
Tract 9295: Located on southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and
7th Street. Owner: Socaland Corp.
Labor S Material Bond (road) $ 50,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) 11,500
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) 16,000
Tract 9298: Located on south side of Vicars Drive between Sapphire
Street and Jasper Street. Owner! Manfred Hall
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 14,500
Tract 9302: Located on southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Lemon
Avenue. Owner: Vanguard Builders, Inc.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $ 88,000
Labor d Material Bond (sewer) 17,000
Labor S Material Bond (water) 10,000
Tract 9313: Located on south side of 7th Street between Hellman
Avenue and Archibald Avenue. Owner: Socaland Corp.
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 39,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) 10,000
. Labor 6 Material Bond (water) 13,500
Tract 9314: Located on southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and 7th
Street. Owner: Lusk /Walton Cucamonga.
Labor S Material Bond (road) $ 84,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) 6,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) 20,500
Tract 9315: Located on northwest corner of Sixth Street and Archibald
Avenue. Owner: Lusk /Walton Cucamonga.
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 40,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) 8,000
Labor S Material Bond (water) 10,000
Tract 9320: Located between Amethyst and Hellman Avenue and north of
Banyan Street and south of Hillside Road. Owner: Lewis Homes.
Labor b Material Bond (road) $ 37,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) 23,500
City Council Agenda -5- May 7,
1980
• j.
Refer claim by Green Andrew Hoxey in the amount of
43
$500,000.00 to the City Attorney for handling.
k.
Approval of a Lease /Purchase Agreement for capital
46
equipment at a cost of $265,000.
46
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LEASE AGREEMENT WITH UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK
FOR THE PURCHASE OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT.
47
1.
Refer claim by Ernest Derho in dw ausount of $10,000
to the City Attorney for handling.
_
5. PUBLIC BEARINGS.
52
A.
APPEAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -02 - WATT INDUSTRIES. A
Change of zone from R -3 to C -2 for property located on
the east side of Haven Avenue between Leman and Highland.
65
ORDINANCE NO. 101 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING THE
•
WESTERLY 557' OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201-
271-53 FROM R -3 TO C -1 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE
OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN LEMON AND HIGHLAND
AVENUES,
67
B.
ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -03 - THOMAS COLEMAN. A request for a
change of zone from R -3 to M -l-for 2.6 acres of land
located on the north side of Ninth Street, approximately
1,000 feet west of Vineyard Avenue - Assessor's Parcel
No. 207- 262 -28,
75
ORDINANCE NO. 102 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALFIORNIA REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 207- 262 -28 FROM R -3
TO M- 1.LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NINTH STREET
APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET WEST OF VINEYARD AVENUE,
76
C.
ZONE CHANGE N0. 80 -05 - JUDITH AND THOMAS STEPHENSON. A
change of zone from R -1 -1 to R- 1- 20,000 for property
Located on the northwest corner of Klusman and Whirlaway.
ORDINANCE N0. 103 (first reading)
86
A4 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 1061 -511 -6 AND 7 FROM R -1 -1 TO R -1- 20,000
LOCATED ON THE NORTHW,iST CORNER OF KLUSMAN AND
WHIRLAWAY.
I 1
lam'
City Council Agenda -6- May 7, 1980
D. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION AND 88
FUNCTIONS. Report by Bill Holley.
The declared purposes of this ordinance are to provide for
the preparation and carrying out of plans for the pro-
tection of persons and property within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga in the event of an emergency; the direction of
the emergency organization; and the coordination of the
emergency functions of the city with all other public
agencies, corporations, organizations, and affected
private persons.
ORDINANCE NO. 104 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO
EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS.
E. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HISTORICAL ORDINANCE NO. 70.
Report by Bill Holley.
ORDINANCE NO. 70 -D (first reading)
. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
SUBSECTIONS (c) and (D) OF SECTION 10 OF
ORDINANCE NO. 70, CREATING AN HISTORIC PRE-
SERVATION COMMISSION TO ACT IN ADVISORY CAPACITY
TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND
PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS, EVENTS,
STRUCTURES AND SITES, AND TO IDENTIFY
PERSONS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE TO THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
F. RESOLUTION ADOPTING POLICY FOR STREET DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR LAND LOCKED PARCELS. Report by Jack Lam.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
REQUIREMENT FOR ACCESS TO LANDLOCKED PARCELS
WHERE NO SUBDIVISION OCCURS.
C1
iJ
L*11
96
97
98
99
1J
City Council Agenda -7- May 7, 1980
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
100
A. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS.- EDWARD
HOOVER. Staff report by Lloyd Hobbs.
110
B. PARCEL. MAP 5441: A REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION TO
SCREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Staff report by
Lloyd Hobbs.
Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve
a lien agreement against Parcel No. 2 that would require the
street improvements concurrently with the realignment of
East Avenue.
Council is hereby recommended to authorize the City Attorney
and the Engineering staff to revise the City Subdivision
Ordinance No. 28, thereby, upadting the Ordinance to
reflect changes in the State Map Act and to authorize the
City Engineer to make modification to street improvement
requirements due to design restraints.
112
C. LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID URBAN SYSTEM PROJECTS AGREEMENT
FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF BASE LINE BETWEEN VINEYARD AND
• HERMOSA AVENUE. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council
approve Resolution No. 80 -39 which authorizes the execution
of Supplement 2 to Agreement 1108 -5420.
120
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT
NO. 08 -5420, SUPPLEMENT NO. 2.
122
D. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR THE BASE LINE RECONSTRUCTION _
PROJECT BETWEEN VINEYARD AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE.
Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs.
127
E. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE. Staff report by
Lauren Wasserman.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council
authorize the signing of the lease for the additional unit
of space and approve the expenditure from the contingency
fund not to exceed $13,500 for modifications necessary to
the relocation.
Is F. ACQUISITION OF MAINTENANCE FACILITY. Staff report by 129
Laure. Wasserman.
City Council Agenda -8- May 7, 1980
• Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council
approve acquisition of the Upland Road Yard and
authorize $137,000 from the faiclities fund for the
acquisitionof the facility and installation of gas
storage and pumping equipment.
C. TRACT NOS. 9193 AND 9362 - ACCEPTANCE OF BONDS. Located 135
east of Vineyard and north of Base Line. Owner:
William Lyon Company.
Tract 9193:
Performance Bond (road) 569,600
Labor S Material (road) 69,600
Tract 9262:
Performance Bond (road) $136,800
Labor S Material (road) 136,800
136
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
O IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY,
AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9262.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -41 137
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY,
AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9193.
139
,'H. ACCEPTANCE OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5687. Located at the north -
�i :wet corner of Base Line and Rochester consisting of 2 parcels
on 24 acres.
140
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5687 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 5687).
E
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4511, (TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP NO. 4511), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND
IMPOOVEMENT SECURITY.
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
S. ADJOURNMENT.
•
19
City Council Agenda
-9- May 7,
1980
•
142
I. APPROVAL OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 4511. Located southeast
V•1
corner of Base
Line and Carnelian Street. Owner:
Buster Filpi.
143
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4511, (TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP NO. 4511), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND
IMPOOVEMENT SECURITY.
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
S. ADJOURNMENT.
•
19
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: April 11, 1980
To: City Council
From: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager �-
Subject: Council Committee Assignments i
The following list represents all of the committees which should have
representation from the City Council. In addition, we have also noted
the current Council representative and the time and frequency of the
meetings. The alternate is also listed in parenthesis.
Committee Council Reg_ Meeting /Frequency
SANBAG /Omnitra.s
West Valley Transit Authority
Foothill Freeway Committee
Soil Erosion E Dust Prevention Comm.
SCAG
Inland Manpower Association
Arrowhead Justice
Citrus Belt Executive Comm.
City Selection Committee
TA Regional Council
or's & President's Comm.
Build Essential Schools Today (BEST)
Flood Control Committee "
County Flood Control Advisory Comm. •:,
Finance Committee
LW /mw
'Schlosser (Bridge)
Monthly
Palumbo (Staff)
Monthly
Frost (none)
Periodic
Mikels (none)
Periodic
Mikels (Palombo)
Monthly
Palombo (none)
Periodic
Palombo ( Mikels)
Monthly
Frost (none)
Bi- monthly
.FSOSi— FScRla..e,,) "Y"iP�y'`("`
On Call
Palombo (none)
Periodic
-Frost {rune)
Monthly
To be appointed
. �,6�lonthly
Schlosser-, {itriag�)'t.
On Call
On Call
9_i dgc, Palombo
On Call
League of California Cities Committees - (Appointed by President of Lcague)
public Safety - Palombo
Employer- Employee Relations - Wasserman
Time of
Da_
Day
Day
Day
Day
Day
Day
Day
Evening
Evening
Day
Evening
Day
Day
Day
open
R867 CITY OF RANCPO CLCAMONGA
WARR N VEN # V E N C 0 R N A M E
AWC496 150C FLUE CROSS
4
R
5
P,
6
I
3
1
0
L'NIThO CALIFORNIA BANK
LEE, GEORGE
EOEHL, GilETCHEN
CYANS, DIANE
2RANCT, JEANNINE
P L'R KHART. CAROLYN LANG
LOGUE, SFLLY
FERNANDEZ, ELIZABETH
N',.WMAN, KATHY
MILLER. AILEEN
VRENA, GEORGE
PARKER, JEFF
RODRIQUEZ, GONNA
CITT?ERNFR, ALICE
FETRICH, CLARA
VCRHSIR. FAY
.
87 LISM.EY, NATHELLE
32 ROESCF, THI A
31 LEE, CHERIE
18 PRESCCTT. MARJORIE
74 MAGRUCERr RUBY
9`. wARSHAW, ROPDIE
90 GENE.:AL ELECTRIC
93 SO SEC C ?LIF CHPT APA
6C "EST. RHCCA
5C FRIEOMAN. BEE BEE
90 GENERAL ELECTRIC
00 GEAN "NES, SHIRLEY
01 I' -0LLEY. WM - PETTY CASH
SC SPICKS, RONALD
35 AYERS, DCUGLAS H
4C CCROON AYERS CAMERA SHO
G7 ESSIG, RCBERTA
92 JOHNSON, JAMES
55 KANCHO GRANDE KIWANIS C
40 INLAND POWER SWEEPING
'0 GLUE CROSS
65 PUBLIC ESP RETIREMENT S
6C ZA S,-C OF NUM FIN OFF
13 SAN "RNDNO CO LM?LOY C
C5 EPPLOYKENT DEVLPMNT DEP
L SAVINGS
T CF COMMEP,CF
MURPHY OLDSMOBI
M T CKJ U'. UUL4J -
FORM ALIGNMENT
FORKS ALIGNMENT
FORKS ALIGNMENT
FORMS ALIGNMENT
REITER DEVELOPMENT, A H
WARRANT
WARR ;OUNT NET
DATE
1.
5.
5•
lr
300.
10.00
10.00
20.00
10.00
14.00
7.00
20.00
20.00
10.00
30.00
10.00
20.00
13.00
10.00
1.926.02
10.00
397.71
117.00
151.58
72.00
130.26
84.00
675.00
36.85
273.45
30.00
233.75
3.072.14
5.596.08
17.50
1.293.50
2.101.13
5r 343.81
5.671.01
377.00
2r 500.00
100,000.00
22.00
189.58
4,072.40
509.50-
711.85- .
5.903.00
R067 CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA
WARR 8 VEN 9 V E N 0 0 R N A M E
03707 0031 AM INTL- ERUNING DIV
03708 0125 ACTION TRAVEL AGE NCY
03709 024C ALTA LOMA AUTO PARTS
03710 0251 APBEGAOK "L, JACK
03711 0324 AVER PLANNING ASSOC
03712 0327 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
03713 0480 ARENA FORD
03714 OROC AUTH.:LET, BEVERLY
03715 1035 AYERS, DCUGLAS W
03716 1040 CORDON AYERS CAMERA SHO
03717 1201 BANK OF AMERICA NT C SA
+ 03718 1300 BASELINE HAROWARS
03719 1350 BEEOLE, TIM
03720 1555 ?OEHL, GRETCHEN
03721 160C POCK PUBLISHING CO
03722 1690 '?RANCT, JEANNINE
03723 1795 BURKFFART, CAROLYN LANG
03724 1R00 2UTLER PAPER
03725 1858 C F. E LU "PER CO
03726 190C C G NGINEERING
03727 2080 CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT F
03728 2200 CENTRAL MICROFILM SERV
03729 2275 CHAFFEY LUMANE SOCIETY
03730 2282 CH°VRON INC
03731 2335 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
03732 2350 COLE "AN, CAN
03733 2395 CONSTRUCTION IND AOV FU
03734 2455 CO SAN BEND TRANSPORTAT
03735 2480 COVOC CURPORATIO)I
03736 VOIC VENGOR NO. 2575
03737 2575 CUCAt'ONGA CO WATER DIST
03738 2595 - UCAVLNGA PRINTING
03739 2600 CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DIST
03740 2604 CYPEP.T, PHYLLIS
03741 261C WILLIAMS PRINTING, D
F
-POST CO
S
zAVLE
HECK PROT "CTOR
T - FIN4NCE
EZ,, ELIZAPETH
NC
L LAWNMOWER SERV
N, CEE CEE
SHIPLEY
TELEPHONE CO
R
LY
TER IALS
:Y, WILLIAM L
Sr LLOYD
JAPES
CITY MGT ASSOC
AN, SHARON R
ON, GLORIA C
5, AN ITA M
FRr 2ETTY
.T PATRICIAFALL A PART
LAGUNA MOE HOME PK
I:A VILLA FOB ESTATE
WARRANT R
WARR CUNT
DATE
NET
44
264
250
8
3
2
1
1,0
1
6
2
19,b
2
66,
1,
2,
2r
12,
8
2
1
•
CJ
•
9867 CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA
WARR 9 VEN 9 V E, N E O R N A M E
37 P.2 55OF CHAPARRAL HTS MOBILE
,3783 5505 TILLIS, LOIS
03784 5510 CUCA "''GNGA COMPoNTY CENTE
_ 03785 5511 EONELLA, SAM
037ab 5512 (R E 03787 5513 SYCAE'OREAVILLAA A
03788 5514 SACR20 HEART CHURCH
n-A ian 5516 SH( P, ROSE
,
,
N °IMr.P.UCF, CHERYL ANN
STEVi�NSON• LA VAE B
JCHN5CN, WANCA J
EURRtLL, LURA P
SHEPHcRO' SUSAN V
TYREE MARTHA
iCVHU � 'CITH L
3LOVf: NARIE A
CAS°, BETTY
"ARKFR. EETTY
COESEN, MARJORIE C
PATRGNITE, ALICE M
CFRLY• SANDRA A
VMTNFY DONNA M
'ILL, BUn IE J
L:ACEY DCROTHY
hH1T• :SICE, JUNE W
NICHCLS• EVELYN
JOHNSON, MARION W
EVANS, PAULINE M
MG LAIN, ALETHA A
ARANCA, ELEANOR,
JACKSON PAT
CTT, JUDITH
:1RICC, MARY A
SHIPLEY, MADELINE E
HILL, ELIZABETH
°EARSON' KATHERINE
SMITH, ALICE
TAFOYA, CHARLOTTE A
E. NORMA B
C, RUTH R
AK, JEANNE
I,LOLIZABETHO
NELL, KATHRYN L
4, RUTH E
ER, CE ROBERT E
t�MY4TLEE
�,R, LORRINE E
'J• DtLCRES M
ING, C -LIA A
;S• EEFNICE A
::R, COPOTHY F.
, FVA
IGU °1. AUPORA
A. ANN Q
LE. SALLY R
CON. ADELINE R
NS, MARY L
s MARY A
. JAOUELYN J
EARFARA J
R. CAROLYN K
LOUISE
. WINIFRED A
R, NYLA
3
VAI
WARR JNT NET
DATE
25.
60.
25.
60.
25.
30.
30.
36.
30.
30.
35.
30.
R867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WARR 9 VEN 9 V E, N 0 0 R N A M E
03857 5585 HAMILTON GRACE M
03958 859 5587 WRTGYT.2 PAMELA OYS M
r 03860 558S HAXFIELDI BARBARA
03861 559C CONNGLLY, LILLIAN
03862 5591 ROBISONI LUCY
03P63 5592 FILLS, JOAN
03664 5593 ,PEEN JAMES T
03865 5594 I+ENCE,FSON1 MARY A
03866 5595 KEITH GENEVIVA
03867 5596 L'EYVA. MARY B
03868 5597 NOYCE, MARIE F
03869 5598 CONFER, PHILIP K
03870 5599 11000. MARY F
03871 56CO PERNONI GEORGIA L
0387Z 5601 XISS:�LLI MARGARET
03873 5602 ICISSELLI HERBERT
03874 5603 YUKECH, PETTY L
03875 5604 IPS014, LUCILLE
03876 5605 JON °_S, LULU
03877 5606 LAYTON, MAUAANDIA
03878 5607 LOMBAROO. CAROL J
03879 5608 MILLER, CAMILLA B
03880 5609 PC CCNALC' ISLA C
03881 5610 PARRFTT, SANDRA S
03882 5611 VFNNCMr COLORES A
03883 5612 0ANKINI ANA M
03884 5613 LYONS, T_R =SA
03885 5614 CLARk. TEOREBIA A
03886 6576 KELLY PAPER
03887 6585 KEITH, GENEIVA
03888 660C' KING ENGINEERS• L 0
03889 6607 K -MART 4C56
03890 663C LAN' JACK
03891 6640 LAIRC CONSTP.UCTICN CO
03892 673C LEE, GEORGE
03893 6740 LEON ARC CAVID
03894 6783 LINVILLh- SANOERSON -HORN
03895 678E LISKEY, CHERYL
03896 6830 LGGUEI SALLY
03897 6675 LOWFS POWER TOOLS
03898 7000 'KGK /YAMAMOTO INC
03899 7175 CPRISTOPFER CHEVROLET,
039CO 7186 PARCCTT, MICHAEL
03901 7188 HARSH E MC LENNAN INC
03902 7191 PARTIN BUSINESS MACHINE
03903 7195 MARTIN, JOHN L
03904 722C PATC1,AM, KAREN C
03905 7301 RIJAC ENTERPRISES INC
03906 7305 I ILLI -R' AILEEN
03907 -- 7315 PILNC SFARON -- - -
03908 7375 PCNAH, N, CLAUDIA
03909 7382 POREJC' RYANN
03910 7393 "ORGAN E FRANZ
03911 7503 NATL GRAPHIC SUPPLY
03912 7510 NAIL SANITARY SUPPLY CO
03913 7520 NAIL TRUST FOR HIST PRE
03914 7526 N -LSON, ACELE
03915 753C NEME,¢, TERRY
03916 7540 NEWM5N' KATHY
03917 77.16 PAS GRAPHICS INC
0�
'
3N' JAM 'S H
UEL' CO NN4
LINES INC
1, Jul
WARRA30
WARR ISCOUNT NET
DATE
1
513
1
6311
2.9
2
3
8.2
5
2
1
2,0
1,2
L
1
1
2
110
3
I
2
•
u
�i
U
R867 CITY OF RANCFO CUCAMONGA
WARR M VEN N V E N D 0 R N A M E
b932 8311 SAN CENO CO SURVEYOR
c1SON
AS CO
CO
IES
ENT
TRl CCUNTY TROPHY
UNIV OF CALIF REGENTS
VAIRIN, MICHAEL D
VANGUARD LEASING SYSTEM
VENTURE
VRENA, GEORGE
'A/W VCBILE SWEEPERS
WALKER, STEVE
WARC, ELLIE
WASHINGTON, JOFNNIE
WASSERMAN, LAUREN M
WFGE \ER, MICHELLE
WEST END UNITED WAY
WHITNEY, MARY
WHIT�:EY, RE%
WILLIAM CUTHBERT INC
FINAL TCTALS
,0
9
S
WARRAI
WARR ;COUNT
DATE
NET
25.86
9,700.00
30.00
90
12
62
57
86
11
28
00
00
00
09
716,344.69
0
•
•
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: April 10, 1980
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department
Subject: Legislative Conference and Federal Aid Briefing
Request authorization to attend above referenced conference in Sacramento
May 14 and 15. This activity has been attended twice in the past and has
netted a reasonable return on time invested.
Cost of airfare, ground transportation, lodging, etc., not to exceed $200.
Budgeted travel funds exist within Community Service Department to cover
expenses.
Request agenda item April 16 for Council consideration.
BHVmw
I
•
•
r�
lU
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UW OFFIC6 OF
ARTHUR J. JAFFEE
ft., onto eoi ilo
30, w[ai Mlalox eouuvuo
POM ON A. GLIFOgryIA YI]fi9
(AwG
(A. C.. ]1 zu31 OYidfiei
coax xfie.lFw
Attorney for
Claimant
(EPACEEECOW TORMUMGGTAYPON TI ,
CI1;' 7 r
1
AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ROBERT GLEN GREGORY )
Claimant ) APPLICATION TO FIL LATE
CLAIM AGAINST PUBLI Y
vs )
(GOVT. CODE § 911.4)
THE CITY OF CUCAMONGA )
In the Matter of the Application for Permission to File Late Claim
of ROBERT GLEN GREGORY, Claimant vs THE CITY OF CUCAMONGA:
1. ROBERT GLEN GREGORY hereby applies to the City Council
of the City of Cucamonga for leave to present a claim against said
city pursuant to Section'911. 4 of the California Government Code.
2. The cause of action of ROBERT GLEN GREGORY as set forth in
his proposed claim attached hereto, accrued on June 2, 1979, a
period within one year from the filing of this application.
3. ROBERT GLEN GREGOR7's reason for the delay in presenting
his claim against THE CITY OF CUCAMONGA is as follows:
A. On June 2, 1979, claimant was involved in a serious
accident at the intersection of Grove Avenue and 8th Street.
B. From the date of said accident until March 5, 1980,
-1-
1'
21
31
4
5
6
7
8
9
10!
111
12
M>
N Oyen., 13
S4
tl:Q.n
1 nN
15i
0
kjUp16�,
kQ -517
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
claimant was under the belief that the sole cause of the accident '
was defendant GARY EDWARD LEDDER and defendant DARLENE A.CRISP.
However, at the deposition of GARY E. LEDDER on March 5, 1980, the
issue of thedefective design of the roadway was raised by defendant
as a possible defense.
C. Since that date claimant has investigated the inter-
section and found that in fact substantial question exists as to
whether or not the roadway and intersection was properly designed.
This investigation has disclosed that in a five month period
running from June 14, 1979 through November 21, 1979, five aceciden
occurred at this intersection.
WHEREFORE claimant prays that the county allow him to present
his claim.
Dated! April 11, 1980 LAW OFFICES OF ARTHUR J. JAFFEE
By I I i
Attorney for
63
•
•
9
1
z
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14'
15
16
17'.
18
19I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UW OFFICE. OF
ARTHUR J. JAFFEE
115A• C'".. 150. 310
WI
aot Wn MI..,. O.U...
FOMONA CA.F.MIA P1769
(AaU .D. YIA) 623.156113
... C.. 311) 15615 -tme
Claimant
Attorney
(SPACE BELOW POE PILLYG STAMP ONLY)
AM AP13
7�8)J1F,11UIL'!212t °r.? 5
SUPERIOR COURT OF THESTATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ROBERT GLEN GREGORY )
Claimant )
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
vs )
(GOVT. CODE 910)
CITY OF CUCAMONGA )
TO THE CITY OF CUCAMONGA:
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ROBERT GLEN GREGORY, whose
address is 1155 E. Deodar St., Ontario, claims for losses sustained
by his business, in the amount of $75,000.00 computed as
of the date of the presentation'of this claim.
This claim is based on damages sustained by said claimant or
or about June 2, 1979 by reason of the following facts:
Claimant was involved in an automobile /motorcycle collision
which was directly and proximately caused by thede£ective design
of a railroad track intersection with Grove Avenue and the defe
design of the intersection of Grove Avenue and 8th Street. Said
defective design resulted in an obstruction of defendant driver
GARY E. LEDDER's vision and thereby directly led to the accident
-1-
.1
1 '
2'I
�i
ail
4!
5i
61
7',
$I
91
10 i
11
12
w
°
goy ":m °13
��E a 14
4111 „
ofu°
15
L',w(VV
S gad 16
"g 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
herein. 4
As a direct and proximate result of said accident claimant
incurred medical expenses, loss of work, and physical and emotional
injury to himself.
All notices and communication with regard to this claim should
be sent to the claimant in care of his attorney, the Law Offices
of ARTHUR J. JAFFEE, 301 W. Mission Blvd., Pomona,California,
91766 (714) 623 -6683.
Dated: April 11, 1980
LAW OFFICES OF ARTHUR J. JAFFEE
By
6.a
)o
Attorney for Claimant
1
& u�
1
• 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
• 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
I. 27
28
(VERIFICATION — "6.2011 5 C C P.)
STAFF OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
w the akme hurt led .,,ran or p,a,,,d o,. I hart .it the
✓oJ (m„• the :,,nrem, Merrill an✓ l:nnl, that the same is true o(mr a,n Ana, ledge n «pr at to those nmrrec, ,hich are,neran
"mod .. ..... m, minrmwan or hrltr/: and ar to that, moos I M1rhn'r a to be tmr.
I J,, lure. under pena(n o(m,an. that the (arrgmng a rmr and ... rest
Stgnamn
cohiorma
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL (IODa. 2015.5 C. C. P.)
ST%Th OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I(Idl o rend,.,, of the munn a(n erwd. / am mrr rho aR<a /eighrern rvaer and nut a pnrrr m the auhm rnnded coma. me ha,vrrrr
301 W. Mission B1Vd., Pomona, California
I tined ined tM1r ,vhtn
April 15, 1980 Iv_, APPLICATION TO FILE LATE
CLAIM AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY and CLAIM POR DAMACES,GOVT. CODE 910
,,a he interested parties
,n m,dnmmjs . hr pla rn, a m,e <vp/ thoeo(endoW m o nmlM rnrrlapr x.tM1 ponagr thrrenn /uih prrpmd m the L'nitrdSwe, marl
Pomona, California
at,_
city Council,
City of Cucamonga,
Rancho Cucamonga City Hall
9320 Baseline Road,
Alta Loma, Calif.
r.,e•nrrdnn -Apr i.l 15, 79 - 80 _nt Pomona, .e'aniarn,a
-- -,do,,
I de lJ /, .niter o.h, ,/ pert..... that the /..rgonot r, trvr and am(vt
Slgnarwr
YI Pot, stanvsoN
MAC LACHLAN, BURFORD & ARIAS
. Lnw RROR.. oN
r. • .. o' 0 "4 :
e1 1s0 NES, FIFTH ,TREE, s„ E FT3 1.sA
,n.♦ uERN.R 7:N C.E 92c..•
r. • r 'i BAR ,BCR NgR OINO. CAII[O RN'A 92401
.O N, �
//-- rr EC , TE.EO.ONE :.. BBS-w9i o ic[ "•�•,.[
i r
A
1[iG r n•o e[ n•c n.[rynr. CJV 1n RERLl H.L-_If RE'•ER TO
1 cy p1LE No 293B
April 2, 1980
7�
CLAIM AGAINST THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
County of San Bernardino, California
Attention: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
TO THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
Attention: Clerk of the City Council
• Gentlemen:
On behalf of Candy J. Cannon and Bill Cannon, the
following claim is hereby presented pursuant to California
Government Code, Section 900, et seq., and the County of
s_a_nffcrFa`rdino Code, Section 11.031, et seq., and in accor-
dance with the laws of r'the State of California:
1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT:
Candy J. Cannon and Bill Cannon, 6148 Topaz, Alta
Loma, California.
2. NOTICE OF THIS CLAIMS SHOULD BE SENT TO:
MAC LACHLAN, BURFORD & ARIAS
A LAW CORPORATION
Attn: Bruce D. MacLachlan
150 West Fifth Street, Suite 103
San Bernardino, CA 92401
3. DATE, PLACE AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE OCCURRENCE
OR TRANSACPIOT WHICH GIVES RISE TO —THE CLAIM ASSERTED:
On approximately March 21, 1980, Frank W. Divin, plaintiff,
filed an action entitled "First Amended Complaint" in the Superior
del
�' Q Ex `11, IYI
lAC I.A('III.AS. ISVRR)11%1) s ARIAS
Claim Against the County of San Bernardino
and the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga
April 2, 1980
Page Two
Court of the State of California, for the County of San Bernardino,
NO. CW 15080 naming as defendants therein Candy J. Cannon; Bill
Cannon; State of California; County of San Bernardino; and the City
of Rancho Cucamonaa. Said complaint was for injuries and damages
allegedly sustained on approximately October 27, 1979 at or near
the intersection of Banyan Street and Carnelian Street in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California.
The claim arises from the alleged dangerous condition of public
property and in the maintenance thereof, and this is set forth more
fuliy in the complaint which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A ".
Claimants are informed and believe that the condition
complained of in plaintiff's amended complaint, if the same did
in fact exist, was a result of design, construction, maintenance
and /or control of said intersection by the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and /or the County of San Bernardino.
Claimants were required to respond to said amended complaint
on March 26,1980 by way of an answer. Claimants assert that they
are entitled to be indemnified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga/ •
County of San Bernardino for costs, damages and expenses incurred
in connection with said litigation and /or to have their liability,
if any, determined on a comparative, negligence basis.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INDEBTEDNESS, OBLIGATION,
INJURY, DAMAGE OR LOSS, REED SO FAR AS IT IS KNOPIN
AT THE TIh7E OF PRESENTATION OF THIS CLAIM:
Claimants have been required to retain the services of
attorneys and have incurred expenses in connection with this matter;
claimants have also incurred potential liability to the plaintiff,
Frank W. Divin, which cannot be determined until such time as the
matter is resolved by settlement, judgment or verdict.
NAME OR NAMES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE OR EMPLOYEES
CAUSING THE INJURY, DAMAGE, OR LOSS, IF KNOWN:
Specific indentities are unknown at present but are
believed to be emnloyoes of the County of San Bernardino Road
Department; employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and /or ocher
departments responsible for the design, construction, repair, and
maintenance and /or control of roadways within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino.
AMOUNT CLAIMED AS OF THE DATE OF PRESENTATION OF CLAIM: •
(a) Attorney's fees and costs in an undetermined amount.
B
AC LACHLAN. 1511WORD & ARIAS
•Claim ,Against p,the County of San Bernardino
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga
April 2, 1980
Page Three
(b) The estimated amount of prospective injury
and damages not ascertainable at this time, but would include
continuing legal fees and costs incurred in defending the liti-
gation filed by the plaintiff and any liability incurred by
the claimants as a result of the resolution of the litigation
filed by the plaintiff.
DATED: April 2, 1980
•
•
MAC LACHLAN, BURFORD & ARIAS
By. Kennethl�T K e�
14
I
L ST: J::' ONLY)
i11AR 2 1 ty G
7 j', "'t�a�`:!an, etlrfwd E Prlas
� SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
8!'
�i
9 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
10 '
11 :�I FRANK R'. DIVIN,
121 Plaintiff,
ii
13 11 vs.
lc CANDY J. CANNON; BILL
CANNON; STATE OF CALIFORNIA
15 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO;
•tl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA;
16 and DOES 1 through 100,
! inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18 —
NO. C'S 15080
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
19 ,, MIES NOW THE PLAINTIFF, FRANK W. DIVIN, and for a
ii
20 First Cause of Action against defendants, CANDY J. CANNON; BILL
21 CA. \SON; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, and each of them,
22i complains and alleges, as follows:
ii
23 1. That the true names and capacities of the defendants
l
2q HOGS 1 through 100, inclusive, whot.her individual, corporate,
I
25 associate or otherwise, are not k"Imn; thurcfore, s:)id defcndunta
26 are rued herein by such fictitious names; and leave of court
27 I will be requested to amend this complaint to ,how their names
28 :Ind capacities when Lho .;ame have horn avicertained. Each of the
I -1-
EXHIBIT "A"
K
THON a MATZ
2
1
. s1.
M
lobo c u'. +.o
Cr`
• `' I
o
Los nn'GC1.13, c DOG)
s]saFn'
121]) 5 ]]]^
411!
ii
',I
Plaintiff
5
aucrncy's for
v
6 �I
I
L ST: J::' ONLY)
i11AR 2 1 ty G
7 j', "'t�a�`:!an, etlrfwd E Prlas
� SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
8!'
�i
9 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
10 '
11 :�I FRANK R'. DIVIN,
121 Plaintiff,
ii
13 11 vs.
lc CANDY J. CANNON; BILL
CANNON; STATE OF CALIFORNIA
15 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO;
•tl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA;
16 and DOES 1 through 100,
! inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18 —
NO. C'S 15080
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
19 ,, MIES NOW THE PLAINTIFF, FRANK W. DIVIN, and for a
ii
20 First Cause of Action against defendants, CANDY J. CANNON; BILL
21 CA. \SON; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, and each of them,
22i complains and alleges, as follows:
ii
23 1. That the true names and capacities of the defendants
l
2q HOGS 1 through 100, inclusive, whot.her individual, corporate,
I
25 associate or otherwise, are not k"Imn; thurcfore, s:)id defcndunta
26 are rued herein by such fictitious names; and leave of court
27 I will be requested to amend this complaint to ,how their names
28 :Ind capacities when Lho .;ame have horn avicertained. Each of the
I -1-
EXHIBIT "A"
K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
defendants designated herein ns a DOE is legally responsible
in some manner for the events and happenings herein referred to I_
and Proximately caused the injuries and damages as herein al -J eged.
2. At all times herein mentioned, each defendant
was the agent and employee of each of the remaining defendants,
and in doing the things hereinafter mentioned, each defendant
was acting within the course and scope of his employment and
au,.hority as such agent and employee and with the consent of each
of the remaining defendants. i
3. The negligence of each defendant combined and
cooperated with the negligence of the other defendants so as to
cause the herein - described collision and the resulting damages
to plaintiff. !
4. All of the acts complained of herein occurred
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State
of California.
5. At all times herein mentioned, defendants, and
I
each of them, were the owners of a certain 1967 Ford Mustang
automobile, bearing California license number TRZ 635. >
6. At all times herein mentioned, defendants, CANDY J.
CANNON, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, were the operators
of that certain 1967 Ford ;lusting, bearing California license
number TRZ 635, and were operating said vehicle with the consent
and permission of its owners, and each of them.
7. At all times herein mentioned, plaintiff, FR.ANIC
i
DIVIN, was the operator of a certain 1974 Pontiac, bearing Califurnia
license number 264 I;QP.
_2_
1�
1
2�
• 3
u
9
S. nt all times herein mentioned, Baoynn Street and
Carnelian Street were and are public streets and highs nys in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of_ 'f
California. ✓
9. On or about October 27, 1979, at or near the hour
of 3:15 P.M., at or near the intersection of Banyan and Carnelian
Streets, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,
State of California., defendants, and each of them, so carelessly
and negligently owned, operated, maintained, controlled and
I
entrusted the above - mentioned 1967 Ford Mustang, causing the
injuries and damages hereinafter set forth.
10. As a proximate result of said negligence of
i
defendants, and each of them, plaintiff was hurt and injured
in plaintiff's health, strength and activity, sustaining injuries
i
to plaintiff's body and shock and injuries to plaitniff's nervous
system and person, all of which said injuries caused and continue I
I
to cause plaintiff great mental, phvsical and nervous pain and
suffering. plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon
alleles, that said injuries will result in some permanent disability
to plaintiff, all to plaintiff's general damage in an amount
in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this court.
11. As a further direct and proximate result of the
noglr;;ence, carelessness and recklessness of the dc.'ondants, anu
i
each of thuM, as aforesaid, plaintiff has incurred and will in
the future incur x -ray, medical and sunury expenses in the exam-
ination, care and treatment of plaintiff's injdrios, the exact
nature and extont of which are unknown to plaintiff at this time
and plaintiff will ask leave of court to amend this complaint in
-3-
17
I (this regard when the same are ascertained.
2 12. As a further direct and proximate result of the
3 negligence, carelessness and recklessness of defendants; and—,
4 peach of them, as aforesaid, plaintiff has been and will be
5 linable to pursue plaintiff's vocation; and has, therefore, suffered
6 and will suffer in the future a loss of earnings and earning
7 (capacity, the exact amount of which is unknown to plaintiff at
I
8 this time, and plaintiff will ask leave of court to amend this
9 (complaint in this regard when the same is ascertained.
10, 13. As a further direct and proximate result of the
1111 negligence, carelessness and recklessness of defendants, and
12 each of them, as aforesaid, plaintiff's said vehicle was damaged
13 in a sum which is presently ur.ascertained. Plaintiff, upon the
14 lascertainment of said damages, will request leave of court to amend)
151this complaint in accordance therewith, and will pray,judgment
is for damages in that sum.
17 �. 14. As a further direct and proximate resu ". of the
16 negligence, recklessness and carelessness of defendants, and each i
i
19 of them, as aforesaid, plaintiff has lost the use of said vehicle
20 for a period of time, all to plaintiff's damage in an amount which
21 has not been ascertained, and plaintiff will ask leave of court
22 to amend this complaint in this regard when the same is acertnined.�
23 15. As a further direct and proximate result of the
24 neglig<nce, carelessness and recklessness of defendants, and
25 lunch of them, as afores;nid, plaintiff has incurred certain Foos
26 for the storage of the wreckage of plaintiff's vehicle in an
27 amount which has riot yet been ascertained, and plaintiff will nsk
I
28
_q_
1
2
• 3
4
5
6
•
7
6
9
10
11
12
is
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
1i:. -,ve of court (c o amend this complaint in Lois rrgnrd wi1R r.
the some is ascertained.
COMES NO'S the plaintiff, FRANK IV. DIVIN, and- for -r, -
Cause of Action against the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
S:,.N BERINARDINO, and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCA61ONGA, and DOES
26 through 100, inclusive, and complains and alleges, as follows:
16. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every
allegation of paragraphs 1 through 15, of the First Cause of
Action, on file herein, as though set forth at this point verbatim.
17. Plaintiff has complied with Government Code
Section 910 and has filed an appropriate Claim Notice with
the CITY OF RANCHO CUCXMONGA, THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, all of which have been denied by operation
of lain. i
18. All of the acts complained of herein occurred
in the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA.
19. The defendants, CITY OF RANCHO CUCA:1GkCA, and
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, are political sub- divisions of the
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, organized and existing by virtue of the
laws of the State of California.
20, The defendant, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, is a sovereign
state of the United State of America.
21. At all times herein mentioned, each defendant
was the agent and employee of each of the remaining derendcuiLS,
and doing the things hereinafter mentioned, each defendant was
acting within the course and scope of his employment and authority
is such agent and ernployce and with the consent of their
-5-
`l
1
2'
3
4
5
6
7
8
91
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
�l
co- defendnnts.
22. As a proximate result of the conduct complained
of herein, Plaintiff was severely injured.
23. At all times herein mentioned, the defendants,
and each of them, designed, constructed, owned, operated, main-
tained, leased and inspected certain premises located at or near
the intersection of Banyan Street and Carnelian Street, in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of
California.
24. Plaintiff is informed and believes that the
defendants, and each of them, were at the time of the injury to
said plaintiff, the owners of the premises upon which the
incident occurred, and therefore owed a duty to warn of known
dangerous defects and a duty of reasonable inspection to reveal
i
dangerous defects.
25. On October
or about 27, 1979, and prior thereto,
I
defendants, and each of them, had actual or construct ivc notice
of the dangerous and defective condition of public property and
i
had noticed that said public roadway was in a dangerous and
defective condition, which created a substantial risk and a
i
I
reasonably foreseeable risk of the kind of injuries sustained by
the plaintiff, as herein alleged, and it was foreseeable that
j
Persons, such as plaintiff, could be injured if reasonablu pre-
I
cautions were not taken to protect them from the risks involved,
;
I
26. On October 27, 1979, and prior thereto,
defendants, and each of them, negligently and carelessly failed
to po.;t any signals, signs, markings, or warning devices on said
property and roadways to warn anyone, including plaintiff herein,
-G-
9
I
•
L
•
( i
!operating a Vehicle thereon, of the dangerous and defective
conditions and defective conditions; that said dangerous and
defective conditions endangered the safe movement of traffic
and said conditions would not be reasonably apparent to, and
would not he anticipated by a person exercising due care and
which dangerous and defective conditions created a reasonably
foroseeable risk of the kind of injury hereinafter alleged.
27. On or about October 27, 1979, at or near said
intersection, while plaintiff was occupying a 1974 Pontiac
automobile, and as a proximate result of the negligence of the
defendants, and each of them, and as a proximate result of the
dangerous and defective condition of said roadway and property,
plaintiff's automobile was involved in a collision as afore
described, thereby causing the injuries to the plaintiff as herein-
,after alleged.
IRiEREFGRE, plaintiff prays for judgment against the
defendants, and each of them, as follows:
1. General damages in an amount in excess of the
)urisdt ctior.al limits of this court; �
2. The reasonable value of such medical expenses, I
x -rays, laboratory procedures, hospitalization, nursing core
and attention and drugs and sundries, according to Proof;
3. Such loss of earnings and earning capacity
according to proof;
4. The rr.amnuib lc valuc of repairs and /or 1-01) 1a( cuu'nL
Of Plaintiff's vehicle, according to Proof;
5. The reasonable value of the loss of use of plainliffts
vehicle, according to proof;
-7_
a
I G. For the cost of the storage cf the wreck".-'e of
2 plaintiff's vehicle following the subject accident, according
I -
3 to proof
4 7, For costs of suit incurred herein; and
5 I, s. For such other and further relief as to this
g 'i court may seem just and proper.
7 DATED: February -7, 19so
8 I TH01 6: MATZ
A PqIo essio a Corporation
10 By
i-
11
Attorneys for the Plaintiff
12
13
i
14
15
16
17
is i
19
20 II
21
I
2211 I
23 li
24
25
26
27 1 I
2311
�z
Warren Clark's
stom Carpets, Inc.
PHONE 17NI 6244
10591 MILLS AVENUE 7 MONTCLAIH• CALIFORNIA 91763
WARREN A ROGENE CLOAK
r DATE -6��✓
�% <T4 L'rlirt�4
f C(ps, �'�U�L QCJ,9G! n� �fI/IPE% /.F13 %deCFp
Crf
/.rr• Liu �.✓l /lads., aE2 `J.6o
m'
_
r7711-
iO b
-r1 • -
�
1
n
S'
.11. ..1.:', , ..........
0
0
— I I .1--."..--•,.....,.v.",wr+ /ct,,P,.q—,n4e�. MUN. 4,,x—,iM.-M 'xH'lM ,W,Y,,x"-,..,�-",-.,.,:1 ;: . I'," - ',
•
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
TO PERSON OR PROPERTY
ORIGINAL FOR FILE
. INSTRUCTIONS
1. Claims for death, injury to person or to personal properly most be filed not
later than 100 days after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911 2)
2. Claims for damages to real properly must be fled not later than 1 year after the
occurance. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2)
3. Read entire claim before filing.
4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident.
5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom.
S. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET.
7. Claim must be filed with City Clerk. (Gov. Code Sec. 915a)
TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Claimant
Business
and Stale
Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim:
RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP
CLAIM No.
CITY CF _ ..'.
ff ; 23 i880
NO P.M
718(9li17j11jU(Sj2j3j415j 6
Age of Claimant (if natural person)
')J�Ll {111t S" t)LTP l.o„a P, Snot
Haw did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars.
FJOU,,l watr•r-ra A50 - Jumped The elarhs .c Car "Tar, 9c, CCimc: - It... S),
Rne.K yarrl 04 Car"A;an- 'At. oe' DaCie yia cd.
en did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars, date, time of day:
�Eh 1�. 0Sc - S'.I5w-
,NL- • lost os a,n. 153.: -w: aiel, ease 1n
Where oil DAMAGE or INJURY Occur? Describe fully, and locale on diagram on reverse side of this sheet, where appropriate, give
street names and address and measurements from landmarks:
31a 1 Ilia I-, , ST. A VTA t,ra
e,a,K of ho.:ZC_
What particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or
damage, if known:
Wn(n lowv ri.�S Ihe. Cw-hS e„ 11dn+, 1, an Sr. UL low t9r "Sr. 'ihe. arvej
G nn r.t h01rA l be 0 4 w,Al C't Thz A- co,,eS C(0,2,1 'TTar ST(`P('i
What DA >TAGE or INJURIFjS do you claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed:
\hp_ C.: ,'cr n1 Tl. p -, u1c -r cl a.ad,Ar,t o,;.- Raee hr, p,C - Teck ocr 71an'Igv-os e<_
J4 the. Sl, d, n. cl'os', Flea.. •. 4lc mlr,/ ticrr. r rlrpvi
c. a•'p•'i ,Z .N acr (�\ wt, •.
What AMOUNT Jo you claim on account of inch item of m)ury or damage as of date of presentation of this claim, giving basis of
computation:
tie damaJ,•'(r P.ncr a ra..a „ap, Inpnt� ynrvj
A113o rc. gorier ro.-
ve ES'LR.i:1'I'ED . \ :.fOl'N'l' as tar as known you claim nn account u( each Item of Frospocns'e lnlury or dam,a ge, giving basis of
I \0 �e'.c!c loto4
SEE PSGE 2 (OVER) 04 THIS CLAIM :BUST LIE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
Insurance payments received, if any, and names of Insurance Company:
E<pendstures made on account of accident or injury: (Date — Item) (Amount)
•
Name and address of Witnesses, Doctors and Hospitals:
C�t.� en,r.av r' Pc �•cc t�•pT. Girr „au.
INr Tl- dLn -a ". „p, (- \r. m. e. ,jnn.Ey nrorc s,r4nv: l2.eh ana;�: ,Mr. Udn PP nibr[!c a_ —
REAID CAREFULLY
For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets. including Nor`h. East, South, and West; indicate place of
accident by "X' and by showing house numbers of distances to street corners.
If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City vehicle when you first saw it. and by "a” location of yourself
or your vehicle when you first saw City vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by •'A -I" and location of yourself or your
vehicle at the time of the accident by "B -l" and the point of impact by '•X:'
NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant.
FOR OTHER ACCIDENTS
X",
/Ax --
X X I IL
&s.: r" SIDEWALK
P,/
F
FOR AUTOMORII_F ACCInENTS
I I L
71\\ 71______1 F
Siamiture of Cloi -.ant or person filing on his beltall givmg 'Typed Name: Date
relationship to Claimant:
rcw/-.. 1 Mri Mrs. Pn "L Eduard Roaenon lq/10 /0
NOTE: Presentation of a false clal& is a felony (Cal. Pen. Code Se_. 72),
CLATMS MUST BE FILED WTTM CITY CLERK (GOV. CODE SEC, 915x).
i
t '
■
woc
3�1p
f#
ya M
r t
T
a
-{�
:{}.. Y.. "�3"}
'I�t�K"i•.-
{;'
F
::?i
i
t '
■
r
woc
ya M
777
T
r
uw ornces
GEORGE O. WEST
A PROFESSIONAL CORP ATroN
am A. or
eewelo ..4al . aP..+o a MILRL arox L.
Ol wvS V DY Swff l YIIXNMDI
OMi(L> iOWILL LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014 NRLLW o CMLWL
(213(624 -5331 _
April 24, 1980
7(8191i911t,1,
City Hall �,.. 11� J1g1J1 ?
c/o Administration Department
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
Re: Cruz V. The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Gentlemen:
Enclosed herewith please find PETITION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE A LATE CLAIM and a copy thereof.
Would you please indicate receipt of the
Petition on the copy and return to this office in
the self- addressed envelope provided.
• Thank you.
Very truly yours,
GEORGE O. WEST
A Prof sional orporation
By
G rge 0. West
GOW:d1
encls.
•
027
W
cP'
•
1,
GEORGE 0. WEST
A Professional Corporation
2,
and RICHARD J. EVANS, ESQ.
.
650 South Spring Street L.��,� Y, .
3'',
Los Angeles, California 90014•• -,
li
(213) 624 -5331 '• " " " ",I "�'�'
f 23 IJSG
'
Attorney for Claimant
v
11
nw
JESSE ALBERT CRUZ by and
through through his Guardian ad Litem, 7131�I)�1ll1;'i�;3;41$I�
61'
Sharon Fraley b
7
81111
BEFORE THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9,11
10"
ll �::
JESSE ALBERT CRUZ, a minor, )
�.
by and through his Guardian )
12'',
ad Litem, Sharon Fraley, )
13
) PETITION FOR LEAVE TO
Claimants ) FILE A LATE CLAIM
14I
)
VS. ) (Government Code § 911.4)
•
15 11
)
THE CITY OF RANCHO )
16
CUCAMONGA, )
1711
Respondent. )
)
18
19ij
TO: THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA:
20'1
1
211i
22
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that by this petition, claimants
i
1
respectfully request permission to file a late claim for
23
personal injuries and damages as set forth in the accompanying
24
II
Verified Claim for Damages, designated as Exhibit "A ".
25
Pursuant to Government Code S 911.6, the Board shall
261'
grant the application where:
•
271
. the person who sustained the
28
alleged injury, damage or loss was a minor
GEORGE O. WEST
............ 1.OM,tlOry
;21216223]]1
��
l�
during all of the time specified in Section
I
2
911.2 for the presentation of the claim
31
As the Verified Claim recites, the minor
4�!1
was, and still is, under the age of eighteen years. Thus,
5,
at the time of the incident and during all of the time
6��
specified in Section 911.2 of the Government Code, petitioner
1
7;1i
was a minor.
8i;
A further reason for the delay in presenting a
9,�
timely claim is the fact that there was an investigation
101`
undertaken by claimant's attorneys to determine whether a
`
11111
claim should be pursued against this public entity.
I
12!I
The claimants respectfully request that the Within
13 ,)
petition for leave to file a late claim be granted.
14!11
DATED! April 23, 1980.
15 ii
'1
GE OR O. WEST
A P o essional Corporat'on
16
11
and HARD J. EV7/��JS 4•
III
17
By u[�
I
G ORGE T
19
torneClaimants
i
20 I
�I
21!1
i
22,
23
24
25 '
26;1'
27
28i
GEORGE ... . O. WEST
(2131 $20311
-2
• DINSS D M451
DfMMS V D45MFn
6vuFLf NIW[u
GEORGE 0, WEST
A RROFESS40NAL c9nronATION
Sufi f....NANN Of /.MfR • if ii+G
... NDU— S. R... f1w
LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90014
(213) 624 -5331
April 30, 1980
q L [AN3EL
,n n,gN.I
NRNNMD,
V IND VJ IL
City Hall
C/o Administration Department
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
Re: Cruz V. The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Gentlemen:
Enclosed herewith please find VERIFIED CLAIM FOR
DAMAGES and a copy thereof.
Would you please indicate receipt of the
• VERIFIED CLAIM FOR DAMAGES on the copy and return to this
office in the self- addressed envelope provided. On
April 24, 1980, we sent you a Petition for Leave to File
a Late Claim in the above - entitled matter.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
GEORGE 0. WEST
A Prof sional Corporation
By
Ge0 ge 0. West
GOW:dl
encls.
PM
aabi
;,;; ii
0
NOW
•
U
1: GEORGE O. WEST
l.! A Professional Corporation
21j and RICHARD J. EVANS, ESQ.
!1 650 South Spring Street
3', Suite 450
Los Angeles, California 90014
4� (213) 624 -5331
I
S I:� Attorneys for Claimants
JESSE ALBERT CRUZ, by and
61 through his Guardian ad
�I Litem, Sharon Fraley
7��
i
A ") PV
ryliil91101011''- !Z'3147v1(3
a
BjI VERIFIED CLAIM FOR MONEY DAMAGES AGAINST
9I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10 !I
Ili! JESSE ALBERT CRUZ, a minor )
12 by and through his Guardian )
ad Litem, Sharon Fraley, }
13 )
! Claimants,
14 �
+ Vs.
15 iI THE CITY OF RANCHO )
16 1 CUCAMONGA, )
17 �i Respondent.
18
19 TO: THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA:
VERIFIED CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
20''
NAME AND ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT
21
JESSE ALBERT CRUZ, by and through
his guardian ad Litem, Sharon Fraley
22
9350 Lomita Drive
2311
Alta Loma, California 91701
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
24,
GEORGE 0. WEST
251'
A Professional Corporation
and RICHARD J. EVANS, ESQ.
26 �,
650 South Spring Street
27i
Los Angeles, California 90041
(213) 624 -5331
I
GEORGE O. WEST
rnon 13162 -5331 on 1
liul ExE�soai � 31
1;,I' DATE AND PLACE OF ACCIDENT: .
21 The accident occurred on August 22, 1979, at
3',I approximately 4:50 P.M. in the street in front of 9328
4II Lomita Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,
it
5 State of California (See attached Police REport) .
6 FACTS OF THE ACCIDENT:
7I1 I The minor claimant, JESSE ALBERT CRUZ, while riding
8� a skateboard down a precipitously sloped driveway, exited
9 lit into Lomita Drive and was run over by a passing car.
101! The accident was occasioned by the concurrent
11 negligence of this public entity and the property owner
12 of the drive,,-,,ay by their creation of a dangerous, defective,
1511 hazardous and trap condition which attracted the minor claimant
14 to play thereon ,
I
15,1 The minor claimant was born October 3, 1973, and
16 I
II is presently 6 years old.
II
17 NATURE AND EXTENT OF INJURIES:
18 Severe and permanent injuries, including injuries
19 to his head, neck, ribs, shoulders, arms, lower back and legs.
20 AMOUNT CLAIMED:
21 $1,000,000.00.
22''i DATED: April 23, 1980
I
23 GEORGE 0. WEST
24 A Pr essional Corporation
and CHARD J. EVANS
25 By
..nnCE n FST
28 'I ttorneys for Claimants
27111 '
28
GEORGE O. WEST
(21 3) 62tO331 S
.•re i ionni IICO/H)T
... .. ... .. ...
`moo
hti�..pi..,•,
�i�irnwi�:
<- ..,..,.'_,..-,...,,:.. _
9578 -,�
-17A-
76
TP /9.7IAUF 8 fly. y3 �. -. -. --
RANc't/o._CUK .c�GF.. gZ72f1V
� .. ..
•�•
...,... ._ _.., � -moo., . -,, .e, ,,....
_ ._. ,..
GJ_ ! 4CWIF OR- _
- - -
�33U J�iniiA D4
�-
I /0 :3 :73 {/n
f�Fltih /b CUC 1,n;✓'FA �J�7- L Voy
;. ,.
. _. h'%
o
I ..; r. s��i.:. .�.J.`:�li.. .�� � -Cl I, •'��'
i„il,.,�i''rol � ^;;�. ....., ..��.'1.I
—._�.
l �1TA ✓�� P/ VZh
N�Fr
... .. ... .. ...
;Fein?
99:7.78 ,/-11
. .. ....
,.
..
,. ...,....,.
I
I
1 I......
., ... ....
^..... ... ...
I
I
i
I
:....
............
...... ........
i` ...... ....... ..
os a�_ 79 T/6so 361
.
�lilTll'li -�. T:�- .�Ti'i`i� *�i�l �'j7'i 1-1 �iill —j -i� r�
.7-F7'-.- VF7 i il
_- g318 1 awAcE i.
LnM i TA
D¢Ivc DRIVE
,..
ccM� ��IA
no
L*l crAsF `'`AAp :
I
jJ cc't aF
9300 (.On1;rA E7 -RFE7—
,..
I I I Ij LI.! I !III !!
SUPPLEMEN.I AL /NARHAI'IVE
ten,„ „tea
C-1 ,. w
- .FACTS: _ _.... .._...._ .
8 ..79 1f 50 __�, -3616 ,P0289 .., 995,784 -,11', ..4„
Lomi La Drive/ CRUZ., Jessie R
,Rancho Cucamonga, San Dcinardino
At -1650 "hours, R/O recieved a" "call reporting -a 1u Lo /Pedestrian accident
_with injuries. _. ,.
SCLt. E.,'CPE;i
1,umits Drive is an East /Wost, asphalt, two lane roadway.
INJU_kI ES
- Victim `:c. 1- (J) �R:tZ, lying in the middle Of the t.'esLbotrnd traffic Ia +`r
on Lomita, I,accrnt ions to the hond,che<t, arms, and le,;s. Vic Lim '•:as
transported to San Antonio Community Hospital by f:niffin ,lmbulnncc.
_STA'P661E::'P5: - _ ..... ... . . .: .
Driver No'. 1 (R) ZEIDLER, Stated o
that was ging m'esL!?nund on Lomita
_
Drive, at approximately 10 miles per hour, when victim CRUZ, riding on a
skateboard, appeared from between two cars which wore parked on the North
side of Lomita. The victim was then struck by Driver No. - -1. '
P,i ,senger and Witness, Kclvin ZEIDIXR, stated that he was �`a t: eel in the
- pasrmigr..r scat of the venic'.e, ns i.t was travel ing l4r.sc cn Lor;ti l.a, at
app.rox it ate1 10 miles per hutr. ,411 of the. sudden, Kelvin saw n )ucenile
riding a s':a'; ^board, appearinn in front of the vehicle. The juvonile was
i -then struck by the vehicle before the driver had a chance to stop.
DRIVER:
Driver was westbound on Lomita Drive, at appro x i ntn Lr,ly .LO niilos her
..hour when the victim, riding a skateLoard, rode out of the drivewav from a
residence failing to see the vehicle. --The victim then ran in front of Lhe
_vehicle. Driver tic. 1 hit her brakes, but failed to stop in Lime, striking
the victim as h.. was crossing the street.
POlti'P OF LMPAC'P:
See factur.l di,vlram from fvrintty D ^vn•
- `cnusE:
_'Pita victim, (Cpj;',), riding nn a ;kaLnboard al,hrarcd fruin bcLt.r:r, Lro parked
cars and fail "d Lo sec Driver No. 1 going wost.h "und rm Lcrtil a. As the
vi cti;n c:a; '.rnusi nq t'.hc ,Lrcu L, Dr icr_r No. 1 a1, 1) her 1, rn: <c2 h•.rt failed
_ to sLon in Lime and hit Lhe victim Is he was ct essinq bhe sLrecL on the
�knt,�bon rd. It t:as e::.Labl ishcd by point. of imp,tc, Lltn L,rCrnicn LS ->I. Lutii •
driver and wi Lner„ and the vehicle point of rest.
" W. Paschal , D^_puty
„. 22.. 79 16'0 3616 508 _
,.,...
URPLEh1ENTALINARRaTIVE
ICnrr+onel 8 37 1945784 -11
rorti ,on nm wnNp _. •. ,. ,• .1
.„ Lomita Drive/ CRUZ, Jessie P..
I Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
R/0-was°assigned to an- injury tra`,fie-aecident , -: \u CO /Pedestrian, on Lomita --
Street, East of Rellman., - -,
RR_IVALiA'C�SCE_JF. :_...
.. _. -. _. .. .... ”` and noted the scene
R/O arrived at - +'
scene at app oximately 1650 hours an
to be described as in-the tactual -diagram.- - -All -measurmcnts arc approximate
and not to scalrz. As R/O arrived, the victim was being treated by the
Foothill Fire Paramedics. The driver of V_hicle No. 1 was seated in he: auto
noted on-the diagram:-_. --
-- --- y, 5 ears, 989 -1542, 9328 Lrnntta
IN'1'F;RVIEW W179i A'ITNi:55: BAFiBEEr Brand WFJ, y _
---. ... ._. .. - - -- ----'--- Street= ---
F1iss BAP.BEE, WFJ, 5 years, stated that she was playing with the victim, CHU7.,
on skateboards in 'the-area. of 9328 Lomita Street. Miss BARGEE stated that
she.-observed CRUZ, as .they, wore playing,..riding the skateboard hetween the
two parked vehicles in the private drive at 9328 Lomita. Miss BARBER Stated
tha CRUZ was seated on the skateboard; -not standing up, as he rode the
skateboard southbound hetween the two - parked, autos and out into the r..•a :'.'.gay
a of Lomita r,treet. As CRUZ entered the roadway, he was struck by
i cle e]o. 7,-'whtch was ' tr.avpli.nq along slowly on Lomita Street. Miss
BAKBEE advised that_CRU7.. did not stop,_.pricr_ -to entering the roadway from
the private drive. -
Wo checked the area of tho roadway for any skid or l,anic stop, +hi uh mi,Iht
- have- been_left_ by.VchiclG No. 1, howover-none were bound. -
DISPOSITION:
Attached to this report and attached _factual diagram to report by Deputy
-
Paschal.
-
.a, r.urn ev
{I r{,o
•'w,-•a _..nn,n. oenuty. ....I D0510 I9oi9.79�..R7': - -�
1�
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
12'
13
14.
151,
16,
17''
19�
20
21
221,
231
241
25
26
271
28
OEOROC O. WEST
(6]16245]]1
VERIFICATION BY PARTY (476, 201S.5 C. C. P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Bernardino
I.. th, mother of JESSE ALBERT CRUZ•
the minor claimant
in the oboe. rrtNNrd anion ar parrrdiny;lhow nod lhr )nrpoino VERIFIED CLAIM FOR
arrd hnom the m.0W, th.rraf; and f aNify that the mmr it true at my a. k..tedyq rsrrpl a. to Thou mall...
udlrh are Iherrin nalyd upon my information or brllrf and a to Ihob .oath.. l br/imr it to be f..
I drelorr, credo prnnll of yrdurythat Mr far,goii., it bur and�ry/or /rea..
Tc�pnaM
SNA ON FRALEX
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL (1017>, 2015.5 C. C. P. r
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
I um a rend..., of the rannt, aforrmid; I am over Ihr age of tight... yrart and not o Oor1Y la tA, milhi. '.Idled
action; my Durinnr addrex v:
On ,19 —, I r,rv,d the uithm-
on m, --
m raid a0w, , by pladag a titer rapY Ihrrrof 11 -1W,d in o ,W,d ravrlope pith palayr therm.. fully prepaid, in
00,d Swa .,dt at
add,e,.d ar /allow.:
I de,larq carder lrnalty n( lrrPr.y, A., th, Iorryoin9 it trn. and corrr.1.
Ewwed on__ __,__. _ _....._at __._ _ _.California
(Corr) -- -- — - `_Ipla.r)
3�
• _..w E VS ouv Z
_ M•aJ..EfiE=
OJ SE C UCesE nEV.N O. "111ER
• SCC_ u:5 LEE B. MARS-ALL
RCeEA' M =1 I M•gvEy L. MER'. ERI
`•�C�•E.. N VN SC 9E LS OwV
:O.. G�• . O'.. �•EVSSLEG
C l"O•sA. 9a'3r I.REL JwE4NE4
�E- %3 CR ,E
E A;A a Mn
wOL
NG
A. E C CC.l VER: OnwO NLiVGER
ER
G•4r � 9C9E4'
•
0
April 21, 1980
STRANTZ & FINE
P +'OFiu ED'S MT L4W
City Hall
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attention: City Clerk
PLEASE REPL' TO
Laz nNGCOES�� <_.o cNin sOOJO
ms w w
«m=
.OS> SO RUin 9aa.5
iz,A, A., J -r000
C • OOAC. a E
SU 7E A.-
5•ie� e)t 6'.J O, •.e! 5'11..0
Re: Lesny Development Co., Inc. v.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Case No. CW 14792
Our File No. 760299
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find original and two photocopies of Claim for
Damages for the above - captioned case. Please file and return
conformed copy to our offices. We have attached a self -
addressed stamped envelope for your convenience.
Thank you for your consideration in this regard.
Very truly yours,
v. q1
JEFFREY L. MALER
Law Clerk
JLM:aem
encls.
�Lu
3C
ram CnL 1WA —SM Sea-975 w -UI
#760299
:_:.CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
TO PERSON OR PROPERTY
OPICWL FOR FILE
ItESERVE FOR FILING STA 43?
CLAIM No.
INSTRUCTIONS Cf
•1. Claims for dnlh, injury to person or to personal property must be filed not
later than 1011 hays after the Occurrence, (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2)
2. China for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the u ,
."minim (Gov. Ccdc See 911.2)
3. Read entire claim hetore filing.
4. See pace 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. ,y 1 ,,..t
5. This claim form must he signed on page 2 at bottom. I:' -! - -: i - ;�•! ;�•, j
6. Attach scpamt^ sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET.
7. Cloini must be filed with City- Clerk. (Gov. Code See 915x)
Age of Claimant (it natural person)
Home Address of Clamumt City and State I Home Telephone Number
P.O.Box 5526, Beverly Hills, California, 90210 1(213) 653 -7117
Give address to which ou desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim:
MICHAEL J. L, RIN, STRANTZ & FINE, Attorneys at taw (213) 3£3 -7500
1605 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 700, Los Angeles, California, 90015
How did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulart.
Claimant has been sued by Mr. Steve Aeschlirrtann, along with City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(Superior Court, County of San Bernardino, Case No. CV 14792). Plaintiff alleges that
'a fence had been stretched across Mayberry Avenue, City of RancW Cucamonga. Plaintiff
proceeding northbound on Mayberry ran into a chain -like fence 150' south of Banyon.
Plaintiff alleges to have sustained property and personal damage,
en Ise DAMAGE or INJURY occur': Give full par ticuiars, date, time of day:
Claimant was served with Subpoena of Sorrfrons on January 4, 1980 by Plaintiff.
Plaintiff incurred darrvige on July 25, 1979, at 10:30 P.M.
Where did DA .'.IAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, and locate on diagram on reverse side of this sheet, where appropriate, give
street names and address and measurements from landmarks:
Northbound on Mayberry Avenue, City of Rancho CUcarronga, 150' south of Banyon.
l lint parnnlim' ACT or O:.IiSS;ON do you claim caused the Injury or damage.^ Give names of City- employees causm,g the injury or
damage, if knew.:
Failure to provide adequate warnings, signs, lighting of road hazard, and of
placing a fence across a public street.
WhaL VMAAGE or INJURIES to you claim reAl:ed? Give full extent of mjunt, or damages claimed:
Claimant has'been named as a Defendant in an action by Mr. Aeschlimann. Plaintiff has
alleged general damages of $500,000„ and unspecified medical darrace, property damage,
and loss of earnings. Claimant has had/ &Slog attorney to defend this action.
WAut AMQi;. ;T do you clauo an uccowrt of each nom of injury or damige as of dote of pie,cn ::aiun of this dumt, giving hasls of
cnrapand.r :
Indertnity for any arount which claimant is required to pay of Plaintiff,
Mr. Aeschlimann.
se ES l;.'JATi;D ASIOUST as far as known )LLI claim mi accowu of coon ue:u L: proapeeUve ul7my I damage, gl,,ng basis of
flnkmawn at this time.
SCE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAItd MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
JSS duw .,vD: i a H tJ d.LIJ-`I +••A :l.a �a i.a.. :..: WIJ
-' ('.as aP.J 'uad '(.3) suopJ c st
wtt,"',[q n Pa uorewasaad '(E9 'aaS i,J;.go) '4wo spun wtela aql of se pauouexa aq of pannoai aq ,Sew slw:w!ep IIV 310\
_ t4ru jE
)8 /LT /4 3NI3 I ZSNVHSS
063 'NIHVY 'P 'I3VHJIW :juewteJ�ot dnisu
a1rQ :aweg pad.CL JatAIS Jlegaq sly uo Puzp; vosaad in wewtelo Jo aanl�,
AlYMMIS
SIN30100V b3H10 UOd
/� ` V
F-7//'-
S1N30107'd 3llflGi�;O1f1V iiO3
'wewtc Ja Aq pauhp wei3n,p iadwd c olaiaq :pelle 'uvponits aql 1!7 lou op .nolaq sww5mp JI :3101V
,; X. Aq taedwt In iutod ayt Pue , PII•. Aq tuappae a.p Io awtt aql to olatga.\
inn{ in )IOSinos ;o vnneanl pne I-V.. sq lu. +ptaac Jo aunt .c alaiyoe .ittp 7o tmpcanl :alatilae rittJ .xns tcnl nob veym op,4an anon as
JJasane.i lu unprnR ..II., sq puu'Ii srs IsnJ non uagat almgan .t1:J )o uonuaol ..V,, jai lal Xq aleuanap'Paaloaut sem ap14aA .SIQ 11
•saouaW 104115 ny saanets:p Io siagwau asnoq 9wA \04i sq pan ,a„ Aq tuappae
It, aac pl ..- giaipw :ua.11 Pue 'ylnny 1.c3 'tt1tnN 9wpniaut •swain In ',tww ware:p Eut.mollol uo aaeld sweep tuappae Ile iod
,[TI;1dIIJV� QV<I71
ON la aJ
'}IJEWTETD STq} Aq umouXup
.slcpdsnlJ pw: vupuQ le ssaippu pur awcN
•saa; s,Aau3O; }V •
(tunnwV: (wall — atetl) :•tin Nt iu tuapuae 10 1pnniaP.. uo 'pew sanlltpuadx3
•umoux qON
:suedwnp oilla.mul 10 Saweu pan -sue It 'pa.maaai aluawdcd aaueinsul
P...,
To: DePurtmem of Afcoholic Beverage Control IN.
1215 O Street
Sucromenm, Calif. 93814 "??^,'j i:0
lh .u+nlc..avue r y,
e undersigned hereby applies fa
lleentt +described as /allows:
Y. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT($)
Lnlstoas So "1341 -.
•:.Cliff; :S�IF :1nti: •� n"
�.' Name of Businets �—
La I�TAnCha
5• Location of Bosinass— Number and Si .et
=0495 :.r w a
Y
- City and ZIP Cade
OF LICENSE(S) 1
�J F(tE -W.. --
APP11ed under Sec. 240"
EffecMe Done ,S..ZiP Cri ❑
3' T%PE(S) OF TRANSACTION(5)
Tip. JDCe 4LJ-
talked
In .- nt County
1 ^• -ys RECEIPT NO,
sod,
tense r, ;� ,C� � ,, TOTAL $ SVew
rf_ -'different - - - - -- 7. Are Premises Inside
(• from S) - Number am Sheet Ciry Limia?
e it fr
V. Have you ever been convicted of �•L ��7 ?J l a felony? i _ .l (IIII
to. Nave you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic
Beverage Control An
I1. Eeploa a "YES" answer ro items 9 or t0 on an attachment which sh Imining to the Act? re81'l °Mons of the Deportment Per.
17. STATE OF CALIFORNIA oun of I ba deemed 1N.n wP Ibb n__N. _.•
IbIte NMIIY N N .•f, wah pw. wh. I;,NM. .NNra MNw r';A- end MI III 1N a IN .W wN M rM .Nlwq, • N M Y-9-
.16.r .1 N Ill fl enl aNlereri.n, rymN in IM I.r.Ni a NkII Nn, All, MWuld N rrNk. %.I MNil".nn n iN bINI 12I IMI IN N, r.H IM lwn
MiM levok-I I \mo IM a \ n:.., aM IN...d ..a .II N IN rwlam.M. fl, .r.n m.d. e. I.; M IMI m Nrwn .Mw III IN
ewla.m
1. .Ilia. . 11.. Y d'n14 i.' pyllli , in . .p. a .pain burin \ ro M a.n6reM .1 M. IiNn.(.I I. ..d Mir N.MatN b m.d.l
Ill Mw IM 1 IN I opplrt —b;, oII %p .d M1.n \IN i\ M mN. N Nlialf IM. N1mM1 .1 . I..n N N . o ..wr.Twl lend inN mN. IMn n. .
dill. NNNlnp Mill. JeY o ..hid: Ih. r .; I .Il. IN s PIN wIM IM ell, m.nl w N pain w ..Iebliah . %.l.r lu N w I% . a�rw .l N.mINw N N
I NDv N l'. enf ar.gner al Irombrw; RI rMl IM INmIN appliwrNn m.v b .NMNwn by .iAw IM NpliNnl N M. IwNNm ni1P n. nwNiM 146'rNh P.
IM D.pnm.nr.
14. APPLICANT
SIGN HERE .. ... .. .. r .. ..... ....
.. ..�
Co- iru ^ot3e Sur '
acb m.ra - ^rN1 r.� ^�r •ray•;'a' •,�...,T.,l,u...,'-n +�r'>-.'.�
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA C..nry of ' ^•r it-�r 1•�- - %(? Date i� �� "a�
Vndx NNNf al Mri.ry, .Nh pwNn nMN ri.neln. appxn Caen. NNiPN eN Np. III N. b M. IiNmw, ar ..IPtN .1 M. wIN.N haNrn.
.I.nxd in M. MNeinp ..If. .Ili<ni.q 111 .rlMr'md 1. meb IM: Ironrbr .MMNi.n an 11. MheIL (ll INI N, Mr.I m.P.r .pplu.li.n N wrreMw
.a jINN.I µ IM IM1NhN IlnnNlll buribed b.l.n IM le Iren.l.r 1 m le It. tunk.nl end,. INelien India.IN In IM vpNl pNli.n .1 Ihi. .MliealiM
Lr,, d 111 NNII% 1. M%eM by IM D YNI 131 IMI 1%. 11111 Illiawim .r wN..N lwgln Ir m.N N INdr 1M Ifmnl w . 1.n . N biN
.w...M .m.rd in . Man n mlf deq % %Ni;p IN Mf en lI IM r MNr pIIINPN n PIN w11h M. e.InllNln w N NN w o"I .
Iuvol w 1. w Iw .nf I"lw M nN.l%.r N N daN..d by 1111 .1, N.,r1w7f NNllnar: (dl IMI M. Non.Iw epPlia.Mn mN N w:Mdnwe Or irMw IM
.pplfa.w w IM 1k. . wiM ;N YI INbiliN 1. IN e.Nrl. X21
U
I IJAY N. EISER r "
jAttorney at Law C17°
2 X500 East Fourth Street •� :r:'i�: is -_.;; ,�t;_,i
(Post Office Box 1800
3 ' ILong Beach, CA 90801
,(213) 435 -7673 NU
4 713191;0;111121121„ <1;5 B
5 !Attorney for Claimant 5
61
7 In the Matter of the Claim of )
CLAIM AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY
8 GREEN ANDREW HOXEY, Claimant, ) PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 910
9 VS. )
10 ITHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. )
11 )
12
13 JAY N. EISER. Attorney at Law, Attorney for GREEN ANDREW HOXEY,
14 hereby presents this claim to the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA pursuant
15 to Section 910 of the California Government Code.
16.1. The name and post- office address of Green Andrew Hoxey is as
17 follows: 6830 Sard Street, Alta Loma, California 91701.
18 2. The post - office address to which Jay N. Eiser, Attorney at Law
19 desires notice of this claim to be sent is as follows:
20 500 East Fourth Street, Post Office Box 1800, Long Beach, Californi
21190301.
22 3. On January 25, 1980, at ar about 2:00 A.M., on Baseline Road,
23 approximately 448 feet west of Alta Quests, claimant received
24 personal injuries and sustained property damage under the following
25 circumstances: Claimant was driving his 1972 Ford Pinto automobile
26 eastbound on Baseline Road. Approaching from the east, going west -
271 bound, were two motorcyclists; however claimant was unable to
lascertain the nature of the approaching vehicle or vehicles
281
043
i
I lat the time due to the lack of street lighting, due to the grade of
2 !the roadway at that location, and due to the speed of the oncoming
3 !motorcycles and a lack of time to react. One of the motorcycles,
4 (being driven by Mr. Scot Bernier, then came across the dividing
5 Iline, directly into the path of claimant's vehicle. A collision
6 'took place in which Mr. Bernier was killed and claimant severely
7 injured and. his property damaged.
8 4. The claimed circumstances and facts of injury and ensuing
g damages and the elements of negligence, to the extent known to
10 attorney for claimant at this time are as follows: Claimant's
11 automobile sustained irreparable damage ( "totalled "). Claimant
12 sustained numerous injuries, including but not limitted to, glans
13 in both eyes and resulting loss of sight and need for corrective
14 surgery; a split lip; numerous lacerations and contusions;
15 injury to his teeth and mouth; and injury to his side and back.
16 Claimant contends that the City of Rancho Cucamonga was negli-
17 gent, inter alia, and to the extent ascertainable at this time, in
18 that it did not provide and /or maintain adequate street lighting in
19 the area; it did not provide adequate spacial or physical division
20 etween the two directions of traffic on the street; it allowed the
21 grade of the roadway to be maintained in such a way as to greatly
22 educe visibility of and distinction of oncoming vehicles to a drive
23 f an eastbound vehicle; and it failed to regulate properly the
24� peed of westbound vehicles and to enforce the provisions of the
25 alifornia Vehicle Code in regard to speed.
II at
26 w5. So far as it is known to attorney for claimant, /the date of
27II i the filing of this claim, Green Andrew Hoxey has incurred special
28 damages in an amount in excess of Five Thousand Dollars (y5,000.00.�
•
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
to
11
12
13
14I15
16
17
18'
19
20
21
22
23
24
25I26
2711.
2811
due to the injuries set forth in paragraph 4, above, loss of
earnings in an undetermined amount (claimant is still disabled),
and total loss of his vehicle.
6. Jay N. Eiser, Attorney at Law, is ignorant of the true names
of any public employee or employees responsible for claimant's
injuries and damages; therefore, he /she /they are named herein
as Does I -XX, inclusive. The true name or names of such ficti-
tiously named employees) will be furnished when ascertained.
7. At the time of presentation of this claim, Green Andrew Hoxey
claims damages in the amount of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars
(w500,000.00), computed on the basis of the following:
a. Approximate medical specials to date - $5,000.00.
b. Approximate loss of property - $2,500.00.
C. Approximate loss of earnings at $1,500 per month, (and continu=
ing) - $6,000.00
d. Prospective medical treatment and surgery, compensation for j
lost earnings and earning potential, loss of vision and pain
and suffering - $486,500.00, j
DATLD: April 29, 1980
JAY N. EISER
Attorney for claimant,
GREEN ANDREW HOXEY
• RESOLUTION NO. 60 -37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PROVIDING FOR A LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK.
WHEREAS, lease purchasing of large amounts of capital equipment
represents prudent financing with regard to cash flow.
THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby authorize the City clerk and or Finance Director to sign the
necessary contracts with United California Bank to enter into a Lease
Purchase Agreement for the purchase of Public Works vehicles in the
amount of $265,000.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 1980
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
•
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman
City Clerk
U
�6
Phillip . Schlosser
Mayor
U
Law Office of
S"A':`,'.n b Fil LCONE
1 ^506 Central Avenue
Ciiiro, CA 41710
(711,) 62R -12t,g
Attorney for Plaintiff
1 , i980
fN
";yi9`5iivdly�;i 12;3t�15i6
A
1.1 I;T CIPAL COURT OF THE, STATE OF CALIFMNI4.
COUNTY CF SAN BEf.1;ALDINO
C116i1ST DE ,HO,
Plaintiff,
-vs-
THE CIT: COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF P -ANCHO CUCAMONGA.,
SA.:'. BERYARL NO COUNTY SHERIFFS
DCPAF.TIKENT, FFANY BLAND, S!tRRi.FF,
DsPDTY M.P.. FULTS. T!'F BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF SPd: BERIIAFDM COUIiTY,
IND DOES 1 through X, Inclusive.
Defendants.
CASE 210.
CUJI4. FOR FALSE AF ^PST
AND FALSE 111PRISOI MM-N."'
1. This claim is nresente' by the Lpu Office of STAGIIEP &
FA.LCONE on behalf. of Ml", :ST DERHO. The Post Office address of the
Claimant is 020 Pichlnnd, Anar.tmont C, Ontario, California. 411
correspondence and or notices resnectinn this clai.r should bP
sent to the Law Office of Robert D. Stacnor f, Anthony J. rricene,
11606 Central. Avonue, CPir.o, Ca'.iforrio 01710.
2. The date and ^lace of the i.rcident 0.vi.nr rise to this
cl,,ir are: Jaruery 11, IM, in the Citv of Panche Cucarcenpa,
Ca.lif.ornia, on I'no+:hill Boule /v�ard at 3aker Street, See Police
7 %
-1-
°.o;nrt 11CIC Nur.iber 306, Officer I.D. Nurbcr F13.�G, Cur:ber
' :i01.03t 7 -11.
•
9. Ciaim.onr was subjected 1:0 arrest by Officers) of
the SAN BT'. °NARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DFFAIT.'. T�.t•IT who were at the tire.
Of said incident acting as agents both of the CITY OF RANCW
CLCASMIGA .ond of the COUNTY OF SAN BERNAPIJINU.
4. Such arrest was without sufficient nrobabl.e cause
and was not supported by sufficient evidence to detain said
Claimant. Claimant was falsely arrested, falsely inprisoned an(i
was subjected to rental and emotional distress by agents of the
SAN BERNARDINC COUNTY SHERIFFS DEFAF,T11SE1IT acting at the request
of and with the consent of the CITY OF FANChO CCCA]',ONCA.
5. Claimant has suffered shock, emb arras seen t, humil-
iation, distress and mental and ?hysical, Pain and suffering all to
his danage.
•
6. The names of the Public: employees and or agents who's
acts, ommissions, and wrongful conduct contributed to the injuries
complained of are N.R. FELTS, D;PL'TY, PPk'Y.. °.hAIiD, SHERIFF, and
DOES 1 through S, Inclusive. The true names, identities, and
capacities of the Public employees or agents are Presently unknown
to the Claimant at this time.
7. The amount claimed as a result of such wrongful acts,
omissions, and negligence as a result of said transaction as of
the date of presentation of this claim is TFT TROUSAND DOLLARS
($10,000.00).
The basis for the above comnutotion is:
1. General damages for shock, 'ain and suffering, mental
<:is t:•ass, humilf:t.ion and embarrassment in the amount of TI:N
�0
z'
• 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1s
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1",IOU.'3A.i-0D . DOLLAPS ($10,000.00).
DATED; ;:arch 21., 19R0
,r
X irNY J„ E —
T
A eyr CLx nt
29 -3-
�T
w
{ * t
ok '
Cat
�aQ
CLAIM rv^R tDAIMiAuE.
TO PERSON OR PROPERTY I CLAIM No. ..... - _ ...............
MA .
CN:L IiP ME
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Claims for d sth' injury to Person or to personal properly must he filed not
later than Im) days aflrr the ocev rrrnee. (Gov, Code Gee. 9!1 2)
2. Claims for da:n:grs to real pir.,rty mast be tiled not later than 1 year after the
occonnce. (Gov. Code Sze. 9112)
]. Read co nc cloim, beforn filing.
4, See nape 2 for dfogr mn upon which to ILKate place of accident.
5. This claim form :oust be signed ou page 2 at bottom.
6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET.
7. Claim must be filed with City Clerk. (Gov. Code Sec, 915a)
TO: CITY OF RASCIiO CUCAMONGA
Claimant
Age of Claimant (if natural person)
Home
Business Address of Claimant City and State I Business Telephone Number
Same (71A)622 -7 ?77 Unit- 206
Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim:
Law Office of STAGNER & FALCONE
12606 Central Avenue, Chino, CA 91710
How did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars.
Claimant was arrested on January 11, 1980, by Officers of the San Bernardino
County Sheriffs Department. Such arrest was without probable cause and
was not supported by sufficient evidence to detain said claimant.
'Pen did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars, date, time of day:
January 11, 1980 at 0245 hours.
Whene did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, and locale on diagram on reverse side of this sheet, where appropriate, give
street names and address and measurements from landmarks:
In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on Foothill Boulevard at
Baker Street.
What particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or
damage, if known: Deputy N.R. Fults, of the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department
arrested Claimant without sufficient probable cause and was not supported by
sufficient evidence to detain said Claimant. Claimant was falsely arrested
and falsely imprisoned and was subjected to mental and emotional distress.
What DA.`dAGil or INJURIES do you claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed:
Claimant suffered shock, embarrassment, humiliation, distress, and mental and
physical pain and suffering,
What AMOUNT do you ehoun on account of each nom of injury or damage as of date of presentation of this claim, giving basis of
computation: The amount claimed is Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) for General
damages for shock, paid and suffering, mental distress, humiliation and embarrass
ment.
Gis'e E:STIJI:1'I'EU .\; IO CN'1' as tar ax knnn'n yuu Haim on account of each item of prospective injury or damage, giving basis of
So
SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
n;Yranrc payment rIC1Wcd, if any, on '1 n " of „
_spendadres mane o:: c . ....t o' acricent nr inp :r fUn:e — he. 10 (Amount(
Doctors and
READ CAREFULLY
For o11 aceiden! claims place on followin^ diagram names of streets. including North, East, South, and {Vest; indicate place of
accident by "X" and by showing house numbers of distances to street corners.
If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City vehicle when you first saw it, and by "E" location of yourself
or your vehicle when I i first saw City vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A-l" and location of yourself or your
vehicle at the time o:'the accident by "B -1" and the point of impact by "X.'
NOTE: if diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant.
FOR OTHER ACCIDENTS
SIDEWALK
P�
CURB
PARKWAY
SIDEWALK
FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS
� UU�
of Claimant or person filing on his behalf giving I Typed Name:
p to Claimant:
ERNEST DF.RHO
NOTE: presentation of a false claim is a felony (Cal. Pen. Code Sec. 72).
CLAIMS MUST BE FILED WITII CITY CLERK (COV. CODE SEC. 9I5a).
Date
3/24/0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 7, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lan, Director of Community Development
BY: Barry Hogan, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: AN APPEAL OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND TONE CHANGE NO. 80 -02 - WATT
COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES INCORPORATED - Request for a change in zone from R -3 to
C -I for 15.85 acres of land located on the east side of Haven Avenue between
Highland and Lemon Avenues.
ABSTRACT: Watt Commercial Properties, Inc., requested a zone change from R -3 to C -1
for the land described above from the Planning Commission on February 25, 1980. The
Planning Commission denied the applicants request because they felt that the proposed
development was premature and that there is no justification for the construction of
the center at this time.
The applicant's intention is to develop a neighborhood commercial shopping center at
this location over a period of the next four years. Since the Planning Commission
meeting, the applicant has prepared additional data for consideration by the City Coun-
cil. Attached to the Staff Report, please find copies of the three -phase development
. plan and perspectives of the proposed development. These plans are only conceptual
and would require specific site plan and design review if zoning is granted. The ap-
plicant's intent would be to open Phase 1, including a drug store, market and a shop
building in April of 1982. Phase IT, proposed to be opened in March of 1983, would
include additional shop buildings and free - standing buildings. Both of the plans and
the total development plan indicate a dotted line along the Highland Avenue frontage.
This line indicates the extent of the Freeway right -of -way which may or may not be
required. For this reason the applicant is proposing the development to begin from
Lemon Avenue developing southerly towards the Freeway right -of -way.
At the Planning Commission meeting there was concern expressed over the potential views
the residences on the north side of Lemon would have looking southerly into the devel-
opment. Attached to your packet of information is a drawing showing what the developer
proposes to construct in order to protect or screen the view of the center from the
residences. Also included is a section drawing. The developers are proposing 50 feet
of landscaping from the property line and depressing the building approximately 20 feet
in order to mitigate the visual impacts. This is similar to the proposal approved by
the Planning Commission on the Gemco site south of San Bernardino Road on Foothill.
Additionally, questions arose as to the feasibility of a market in the area at this
time. The applicant has prepared a market and fiscal impact study done by Economic
Research and Associates which is submitted in your packet for your information. In
addition, the applicant hired the firm of Linscott, Law, Greenspan, Inc., Engineers,
to do a traffic report to determine whether or not the development would impact the
area or change the level of service provided on the streets. Further, the applicant
has contracted with PBR, same firm that did the FIR for the Daon Southwest property,
.to prepare an initial study for the development. It also is included in your packet
for your review and consideration.
6�z
May 7, 1980
Page 2
Exhibit "B" indicated the general planning for the area and the property, in addition
to the existing zoning. The property presently is master planned for mixed use and
contains an asterick indicating it is an alternate commercial site which allows the
applicant to request the zone change from R -3 to C -1. As the Council may recall,
when a General Plan amendment was granted to the property owner for this property
the mixed use designation was shown all the way to Lemon Avenue. At that time CCSRs
were recorded to restrict vehicular access to Lemon Avenue from any commercial
development that may be proposed for this site. The purpose was to insure land use
compatability between the residential and commercial uses. Part I of the Initial
Study is attached for your review in addition to the information submitted by the
applicant regarding traffic, drainage, and market ability. If the Council finds
that there is no significant adverse impact that would be created on the environment
as a result of the zone change then a Negative Declaration should be issued for the
project.
RECOMMENDATION: If after review of the information presented herein, and by the
applicant, the Council concurs with the actions of the Planning Commission then a
motion should be made to deny the appeal upholding the Planning Commissions' decision.
If the City Council, after review of the information presented herein, and by the
applicant, feels that the zone change is appropriate and will not cause significant
adverse impacts on the environment, then a motion should be made to adopt the attached
ordinance approving Zone Change No. 80 -02 and the issuance of a Negative Declaration.
- - RespectfulWsubmit,ed, .._
Jack Lam, Director of
Community Development
JL:cd
Attachments: Location Map
General Plan and Zoning Map
Applicant's Exhibits
53
174
•
is
(" C
L.cc, MOM HAP
EXH181T 'le 6y
LOW IV I I I LOW DeN6lTY
• PI
4.
w � mo
LOW
C) W vaTY
4W,NF,FALI. PLAN
0
C
9-
Q -I
fl'ofwTC
ut
�3
K -3
R-1 IM R -1
n
u
EXtyriNG ZOO NG
6KNOT "C'' 6S
'F E
6hy
shops 2
I r.
l_
-CI
market
1
fff ' J
n° D9,' l
IF. [ - /)
I i
� I
1-
r
I NFNEN AVENUE
f
PHASE 1
OPENING APRIL 1982
SUMMARY
SITE 380358 -SF
BLDG AREA 76215 SF
PARKING STALLS 506
ACRES 8.73e
RATIO 3.99 TO
PER 1000 SF 6.64
1 =-
HWEN AIENLE
--U-1 C i-, LL- t
Ifl[H HN I i I lh-9
-
-- fl�
.Jl J"I
SUMMARY
PHASE 2 SR
4139418,SF ACRES .Wz
OPENING MARCH 1983 :LDG AREA 1126I5SF RATIO 2.68701
PARKING STALLS 534 PER 1000 SF 4.74
yYv
IMMMY
HOME AVINW19
s
C>
6N
SECTION THRU HAVEN AVENUE
i
SECTION THRU LEMON AVENUE
8
b
i
• CITY OF RIGICHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
• the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: None as yet.
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
2716 Ocean
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: R c..,.rr ne11 . nl.error of airs A� tior
Watt Commercial Properties. Inc. 2716 Ocean Park Boulevard,
Santa Monica, CA 90405
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
Haven Avenue between Lemon and Highland _
201 -271- 4 6 21
LIST OTHER PEIU4ETS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAI, AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
I- I
�z
PROJECT DESCRIPTION •
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Enclosed for your perusal are preliminary
plot plans which outline the basic concept of the project.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 15.85 net useable acres -
see plot plan for building information.
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONME`IPAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SFTE
INCLUDING INNRDIATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANIMLS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEI•iIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY .
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
The t will be a fully landscaped, integrated shopping center with
minimal affect on the surrounding land uses.
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions', which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
we — 4� the neantiatina staaes for the acquisition of the balance of
We are not presenrly pucsuin9 ' U1UVU1Wu� y.au .n. ..u— p.,,�«Y y U6 WU -
anticipate that it will be a townhome type development with possible othe
uses as well.
I- 2
63
WILL THIS PROJCCT:
• YES NO
_ x 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
Ll
x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations? Change of zone.
X - _ 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 101
_ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YF.S answers above: The property is
......�t1v >nne R -3. However. the Property is general
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIrICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ibility, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional inf.orination may hn requirod to be submitted
before on adequate ovaulation can be made by the Devrb,prent
Review Cor,Rnittee.
Date ? %r<` Signature
Title
z --3 4 4
0
ORDINANCE NO. 101
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING THE WESTERLY
557' OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 271 -53 FROM
R -3 TO C -1 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE
BETWEEN LEMON AND HIGHLAND AVENUES
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
Tong:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing
held in the time and manner prescribed by law,
on the rezoning of the property hereinafterdescribed,
and this City Council has held a public hearing
in the time and manner prescribed by law as
• duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the
General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
•
C. This rezoning will have no significant environ-
mental impact as provided in the Negative
Declaration filed herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
R -3 (multiple family residential) to C -1 (neighborhood
commercial)
Said property is located on the east side of Haven Avenue between
Lemon and Highland Avenues known as the westerly 557' of Assessor's
Parcel Number 201- 271 -53.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on
the 31st day after its adoption,
65
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California,
and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
�4
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
J
0
lJ
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
Date: May 7, 1980
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Jack Lam
Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -03 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - THOMAS
COLEMAN - A request for a change of zone from R -3 to M -1 for
property located on the south side of 9th Street approximately
1,000 feet west of Vineyard Avenue - 8738 9th Street -
Assessor's Parcel No. 207- 262 -28
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of March 26, 1980,
held a public hearing to consider the above- described zone change and
recommended approval to the City Council as indicated on the attached
Resolution. However, the Commission recommended a change of zone to M -R
(restricted manufacturing) rather than the M -1 requested by the applicant.
The applicant is requesting a change of zone for approximately 2.4 acres
of land located at 8738 9th Street (Exhibit "A "). The subject property
is presently zoned R -3 (multiple family residential) and has requested a
change of zone to M -1 (limited industrial). The applicant has requested
the change of zone to allow for future development of industrial uses on
the property.
ANALYSIS: Exhibits "B" and "C" indicate the adjacent land use and zon-
ing which is described as follows:
LAND USE ZONING
North Vacant A -1
South Radio Station, vacant land M -R
East Light Industrial M -R
West Single Family Residence, and vacant land A -1
Exhibit "D" displays the Interim Land Use Element of the General Plan which
designates the subject property as Minimum Impact Industrial. The General
Plan Land Use Element contains only two industrial land use classifications;
minimum impact and major. The zoning ordinance contains 3 industrial desig-
nations; M -R, Restricted Manufacturing, M -1 Limited Manufacturing, and M -2
General Manufacturing. The Minimum Impact designation of the General Plan
can be implemented through zoning the land either M -R or M -1 to bring the
land in conformance with the General Plan. The applicants' request is for
M -1 zoning for the subject property. However, all properties to the east
and south, which are presently zoned for industrial purposes, are zoned
M -R. It appears as though these areas were zoned M -R because of the close
proximity of residential and other sensitive land uses in the area. The M -R
67
City Council and City Manager
May 7, 1980
Page 2
zone is more restrictive and more compatible with surrounding land uses
than M -1 zoning. Therefore, to be consistent with the surrounding zoning
and established zoning policies for this area, it is recommended that the
subject property be granted a zone change to the more restrictive zone of
M -R (Restricted Manufacturing).
The Initial Study has been prepared for the environmental assessment of
this zone change. Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as provided by
the applicant. The environmental checklist was completed by staff with
no positive responses to any of the items; thus leading to the finding of
no adverse impacts as a result of the project. If after review of the
Initial Study, the Council finds the environmental assessment to be ade-
quate, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order.
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was published in the Daily
Report egal ad section on April 23, 1980. In addition, notices of public
hearing were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject
property. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or
against this project.
•
RECOMMENDATION: If, after review of the information presented herein
and after the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council concurs •
with the above analysis and recommendation of the Planning Commission, the
appropriate action would be adoption of the attached Ordinance which approves
Zone Change No. 80 -03 from R -3 to M -R.
Respectfully submitted,
Jack Lam, Director of
Community Development
JLMV:kds
Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map
Exhibit "B" Land Use
Exhibit "C" Existing Zoning
Exhibit "D" General Plan Designation
Part I Initial Study
Resolution No. 80 -10
Ordinance
F,
.1
- YO,TTA
I I �
I I I
' I
I I I
I �
I i I
I - 1 - - -j rl
� � -- ` JdTf�B! -fL
I
I j I
I i '
I i '
� I
� I i
Zone clhavgle YO,
.,,=rin 7qav
61
90-03
L
r r
,Zane CAI-ve
�Ewtilg La d
-- NOAM -T
70
•
•
or
4
r �
0 - YOArxT
�r
.T-vmbit
- YO,Trtt--T
i �
�- 9ltrrumw„ i
-2z
L
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -10
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE
NO. 80 -03 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM
R -3 TO M -R FOR 2.40 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF NINTH STREET, 1,000' WEST OF VINEYARD -
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 207- 262 -28
WHEREAS, on the 26th day of February, 1980, an application was filed
and accepted on the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 26th day of March, 1980, the Planning Commission held
a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California
Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following findings:
1. That the subject property is suitable for the
uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of
access, size, and compatibility with existing
land use in the surrounding area;
2. The proposed zone change would not have signi-
ficant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties; and
3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance
with the General Plan,
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found
that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on
the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration
on March 26, 1980.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the
California Government Code, that the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval on the 26th day of March, 1960,
Zone Change No. 80 -03,
2. The Planning Commission herchy recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 80 -03.
73
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and •
related material hereby adopted by the Planning
Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 1980
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ATTEST: l
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho •
Cucamonga, do herebv certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commis-
sion held on the 26th day of March, 1980, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GARCIA, JONES, DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
•
-?4
ORDINANCE NO. 102
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
• CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 207 - 262 -28 FROM R -3 TO M -R, GENERALLY LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET APPROXIMATELY 1,000' WEST
OF VINEYARD AVENUE
0
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing
held in the time and manner prescribed by law,
recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter
described, and this City Council has held a public
hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law
as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. This rezoning will have no significant environ-
mental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration
filed herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned
in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly.
R -3 (Multi - family Residential) to M -R (Restricted Manufacturing)
Said property is located on the south side of 9th Street approximately
1,000' west of Vineyard known as Assessor's Parcel Number 207 - 262 -28.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the
31st day after its adoption.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in the Daily Report, a newspaper of general circu-
lation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip 0. Schlosser, Mayor
• ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
75
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
Date: May 7, 1980
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Jack Lam
Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -05 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - JUDITH AND
THOMAS STEPHENSON - A change of zone from R-1-1 to R-1-20,000
for property located on the northwest corner of Klusman and
Whirlaway.
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of April 9, 1980,
Feld a public hearing to consider the above- described zone change and
recommended approval to the City Council as indicated on the attached
resolution. The applicants are requesting a change of zone for approxi-
mately 3.3 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Klusman and
Whirlaway (Exhibit "A "). The subject property is presently zoned R -1 -1
(Single Family Residential, one acre minimum lot size) and the request is
for a change to R- 1- 20,000 (Single Family Residential on minimum one -half
acre lot). The applicant had previously proposed to divide the property
into four single family one -half acre lots and discovered the zoning
. required minimum 1 acre. Thus, a zone change is now being requested that
would permit the subdivision of land.
ANALYSIS: Exhibits "B" and "C" indicate the adjacent land use and zoning
which is described as follows:
LAND USE ZONING
NORTH
Flood Control
R -1 -1
SOUTH
Single Family Residential
R -1 -20
EAST
Single Family Residential
R -1 -1 and R -1 -20
WEST
Single Family Residential
R -1 -20
The interim land use element of the General Plan designates the
subject property as very low density (1 - 2 units per acre). As can be
seen on the existing zoning map the subject property is bounded on the
east, west and south by one -half acre zoning, The majority of the homes
in the surrounding area are developed on one -half acre lots. Therefore,
the zone change request would be compatible with the existing zoning and
development in the surrounding area. Further, the zone change is consis-
tent with the General Plan designation of very low density.
The Initial Study has been prepared for the Environmental Assessment of
the zone change. Attached is Part 1 of the Initial Study as provided by
the applicant. The Environmental checklist was completed by staff with
no positive responses to any of the items; thus, leading to the finding
of no significant impacts on the environment as a result of the project.
7�
City Council and City Manager
May 7, 1980
Page 2
If after review of the Initial Study, the Council finds the Environmental •
assessment to be adequate, the issuance of the Negative Declaration would
be in order.
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was published in the Daily
Report legal ad section on April 23, 1980. In addition, notice of public
hearing was sent to all property owners within 300 feet of subject property.
To date no correspondence has been received either for or against this
Project.
RECOMMENDATION: If, after review of the information presented herein
and after the conclusion of public hearing, the City Council concurs with
the above analysis and recommendation of the Planning Commission, the
approprirate action would be adoption of the attached Ordinance which
approves Zone Change No. 80 -05 from R -1 -1 to R -1- 20,000.
�R pec tful�ted,
JACK LAM, Director of
Community Development
JL:MV:kds •
Attachments: Exhibit "A ", Location Map
Exhibit "B ", Land Use Map
Exhibit "C ", Zoning Map
Part I, Initial Study
Resolution
Ordinance
•
7�
RANC,40 W(AMONGA,
ZONE CHA.MGC REQUEST
FARGEL MAP N0• �1 1 Z (a
N `
F
S
� 3
:t
L v L
Q
�F
} 1
CI
I IF�
i
ti
z _
� G-
J � (r
J
w L CC
0 p U
7 � c
— Subject f
Cq G aNG
! `, & 4
1
SINGLE
FAMILY
DWELLINGS
s w
z la
0
}
_ � 1
CARR PR, I COURT
I
N ! SCAIE- I� =2GC�
-r
N
N'
P � p
I �
r�W H IIrR- LA —W—AY
a' fI 11
9T.
�8 Exhibit A 11
N
f-
LO
F
KANC,40 CUCAMONGA
ZONE CHANGE RE&UEST
PARCEL MAP NO. 512(4
r, 'I
s
J 2 Q
J
J
z 3
o � �
Q •J
C
J u ' ,L
w L CARRARI Cbu?T •
CL
j d C
Subject Property � � j
z
VgCGAT N $GALE- i' =20G
T
N ( F-
1,y�o,� o
WNIRLAWAY 57.
SINGLE
FAMILY
OWELLINSS
Y I
7� Exhibit „g,
Lars Use Map
RAW. J0 CUCAMONGA
ZONE CHANCE REQUEST
PARCEL MAP NO. 5120
0
• I i
I
R -1- "c0
r'
N
3
2 � �
N
k
4) e,
> 7
rl N
i
J
c
2
o U
� V
a r.,
Q J
LL F
G
U
W L f
� d G
u
a
1
SINGLE
FAMILY
DWELLINGS
R-i -2c
Q
J
CS
Q
Zi
ID
i
4
CARRARI COU K{"
I
1 N R I- 20
sCALE- i'=20L
N
7-
_ 1
ol w
D
WHIRLAWAY 9T
Exhlblt C
caD Zoarong Map
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -17
• A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECO1MIENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE C
NO. 80 -05 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING
FROM R -1 -1 TO R -1 -20 FOR 3.3 ACRES LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HUASMAN AND WHIRLAWAY -
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 1061 -511 -6 AND 7
WHEREAS, on the 17th day of March, 1980, an application was filed
and accepted on the above described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 9th day of April, 1980, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following findings:
1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access,
size, and compatibility with existing land use in
the surrounding area;
2. The proposed zone change would not have significant
impact on the environment nor the surrounding pro-
perties; and
• 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with
the General Plan.
•
SECTION 2_ The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that
this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environ-
ment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on April 9, 1980.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the Cali-
fornia Government Code, that the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends
approval on the 9th day of April, 1980, Zone Change
No. 80 -05.
2. Time Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 80 -05.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission
shall be forwarded to the City Council.
UI
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980,
I.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RY:� /
Herman Rempel, A
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 9th day of April, 1980, by the following vote,
to wit: •
AYES: COK41SSIONERS: Dahl, Tolstoy, Garcia, Jones, Rempel
NOES: CONNISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
l J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
aprl- 'Czti0r., the Env_- o:ren_al Anzly ... = « -ff wi)I prepare
Part II of the Initial Studv. The Development Review
Committee will'meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
• the proposed project.
•
PROJECT TITLE: Stephenson Lot Split
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Thomas G. and
Judith D. Stephenson; 7881 Birchwood Circle' La Palma
CA 90623
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Robert Gilbert; Gilbert
L'ngineering; 14730 Firestone Blvd. Unit 309: La Mil
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
- 071 -40 and 49
LIST OTHER PERDIITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
I -1
S3
i
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
development of four res
L
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Total acreage 3.30. No
exictinn huildinas. Pronnaed - four sinale family uSOmb?.0 ^S cal
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMYNTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORrtATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
area. There are no trees on the site and no historic or scer4
charateristics apparent.
There are no existing structures On the property.
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
Two additional single family 's acre lots may be developed
at a later time on this nronertv.
I
l.I
4-2.
F-4
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
X 4, create changes in the existing zoning or
,general plan designations?
E 5: Remove any existing trees? How many?
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development
Review Committee.
Date November 5, 1979 signature
• Title R. C. Gilbert. Engineer
z -3 4;S
ORDINANCE NO. 103
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 1061 -511 -6 AND 7 FROM R -1 -1 TO
R- 1- 20,000 FOR 3.3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF KLUSMAN AND WHIRLAWAY
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing
held in the time and manner prescribed by law,
recommends the rezoning of the property herein-
after described, and this City Council has held
a public hearing in the time and manner, pres-
cribed by law as duly heard and considered said
recommendation.
• B. That this rezoning is consistent with the
General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
E
C. This rezoning will have no significant environ-
mental impact as provided in the Negative
Declaration filed herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
Fe-zoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
R -1 -1 (single family residential on minimum one acre lot) to
R- 1- 20,000 (single family residential on minimum 20,000 sq.
ft.lots).
Said property is located on the northwest corner of Klusman and
Whirlaway known as Assessor's Parcel Number 1061 -511 -6 and 7.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m.
on the 31st day after its adoption.
• •
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the •
City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen
(15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a
newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario,
California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
MA
LJ
E
M E M O R A N D U M
• May 1, 1960
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services
Subject: ORDINANCE: Emergency Organization and Functions
This Ordinance is the required "enabling" action that provides City a
vehicle to develop an emergency plan for Rancho Cucamonga.
The Ordinance creates the Rancho Cucamonga Disaster Council under Section 3.
This Disaster Council is State mandated under the California Emergency Services
Act. In essence, the Council is made up of the parties who will be involved
in addressing a disaster. They will function as described in Section 4.
The City Manager shall be the Director of Emergency Services and he will
appoint an Assistant Director of Emergency Services (Sections S and 6).
The EMFROENCY PLAN (section 8) is the main thrust and purpose of this entire
endeavor. This is the "nuts and bolts" of who, what, when and where in
• addressing a disaster.
The City Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the Ordinance.
From this point, the real work "officially" begins, that of making the plan
and MOUs with the primary agencies providing service to the City.
We are still on schedule and should have Plan before City Council by July 15.
If you have any questions please give me a call.
BU/mw
cc: Lloyd Michael, CCWD w /attachment
Bob Lee, F.F.D. w /attachment
Tom Wickum, Sheriff Office w /attachment
ORDINANCE No, 104
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON>A RELATING
TO EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
does ordain as follows:
Section 1: Purnoses.
The declared purposes of this ordinance are to
provide for the preparation and carrying out of plans for the
protection of persons and property within this City in the event
of an emergency; the direction of the emergency organization; and
the coordination of the emergency functions of this City with all
other public agencies, corporations, organizations, and affected
private persons.
Section 2. Definition. •
As used in this ordinance, "emergency" shall mean the
actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of
extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within this
City caused by such conditions as air pollution, fire, flood, storm,
epidemic, riot, or earthquake, or other conditions, including con-
ditions resulting from war or imminent threat of war, but other than
conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which conditions are
or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel,
equipment, and facilities of this City, requiring the combined
forces of other political subdivisions to combat.
Section 3, Disaster Council Membership.
The Rancho Cucamonga Disaster Council is hereby
created and shall consist of the following: .
(a) The Mayor, who shall be Chairman.
A
_l_
• shz- �l- be- t'TCe " "C�irmari.
(c) The Assistant Director of Emergency Services.
(d) Such chiefs of emergency services as are
provided for in emergency plan of this City, adopted pursuant
to this ordinance.
(e) Such representatives of civic, business,
labor, veterans, professional, or other organizations having
an official emergency responsibility, as may be appointed by
the Director with the advice and consent of the City Council.
Section 4: Disaster Council Powers and Duties.
It shall be the duty of the Rancho Cucamonga
Disaster Council and it is hereby empowered, to develop and
recommend for adoption by the City Council, emergency and
mutual aid plans and agreements and such ordinances and
resolutions and rules and regulations as are necessary to
• implement such plans and agreements. The Disaster Council
shall meet upon call of the Chairman or, in his absence from
the City or inability to call such meeting, upon call of the
Vice Chairman.
Section 5: Director and Assistant Director of
Emergency Services.
(a) .There is hereby created the Office of Director of
Emergency Services. The City Manager shall be the Director of
Emergency Services.
(b) There is hereby created the Office of Assistant
Director of Emergency Services, who shall be appointed by the
Director.
Section 6: Powers and Duties of the Director and
Assistant Director of Emergency Services.
(a) The Director is hereby empowered to:
(1) Request the City Council to proclaim the
-2- I! 6
existance or threatened existence of a "local emergency" if
•
the City Council is in session, or to issue such proclamation
if the City Council is not in session. Whenever a local
emergency is proclaimed by the Director, the City Council
shall take action to ratify the proclamation within 7 days
thereafter or the proclamation shall have no further force or
effect,
(2) Request the Governor to proclaim a
"state of emergency" when, in the opinion of the Director,
the locally available resources are inadequate to cope with
the emergency.
(3) Control and direct the effort of the
emergency organization of this City foA the accomplishment
of the purposes of this ordinance,
,
(4) Direct cooperation between and coordination
of services and staff of the Emergency Organization of this City;
and resolve questions of authority and responsibility that may
arise between them,
•
(5) Represent this City in all dealings with
public or private agencies on matters pertaining to emergencies
as defined herein,
(6) In the event of the proclamation of a
"local emergency" as herein provided, the proclamation of a
"state of emergency" by the Governor or the Director of the
State Office of Emergency Services, or the existence of a
"state of war emergency," the Director is hereby empowered:
(i) To make and issue rules and regulations
on matters reasonably related to the protection of life and property
as affected by such emergency; provided, however, such rules and
regulations must be confirmed at the earliest practicable time by
the City Council,
(ii) To obtain vital supplies, equipment,
and such other properties found lacking and needed for the pro-
tection of life and property and to bind the City for the fair
valurr thereof, and, if required immediately, to commandeer the
•
same for public use.
(iii) To require emergency services of
any City aXiidwmwW employee and, in the event of the proclamation
of a "state of emergency" in the County in which this City is
located or the existance of a "state of war emergency," to command
the aid of as many citizens of this community as he deems necessary
in the execution of his duties; such persons shall be entitled to
all privileges, benefits, and immunities as are provided by state
law for registered disaster service workers.
(iv) To requisition necessary personnel
or material of any City department or agency; and
(v) To execut: all of his ordinary powers
as City Manager, all of the special powers conferred upon him
by this ordinance or by resolution or emergency plan pursuant
hereto adopted by the City Council, all powers conferred upon
him by any statute, by any agreement approved by the City Council,
and by any other lawful authority,
(b) The Director of emergency services shall
designate the order of succession to that office, to take effect
in the event the Director is unavailable to attend meetings and
otherwise perform his duties during an emergency. Such order of
succession shall be approved by the City Council.
(c) The Assistant Director shall, under the
supervision of the Director and with the assistance of emergency
service chiefs, develop emergency plans and manage the emergency
programs of this City; and shall have such other powers and duties
as may he assigned by the Director
Section 7: Emergency Organization.
All officers and employees of this City, together
with those volunteer forces enrolled to aid them during an emergency,
and all groups, organizations, and persons who may by agreement or
operation of law, including persons impressed into service under
the provisions of Section 6 of this ordinance, be charged with
duties incident to the protection of life and property in this City
during such emergency, shall constitute the emergency organization
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
-4-
IoC
Section S: Emergency Plan.
The Rancho Cucamonga Disaster Council shall be
responsible for the development of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Emergency Plan, which plan shall provide for the effective mobil-
ization of all of the resources of this City, both public and
private, to meet any condition constituting a local emergency,
state of emergency, or state of war emergency; and shall provide
for the organization, powers and duties, services, and staff of
the emergency organization. Such plan shall take effect upon
adoption by resolution of the City Council.
Section 9: Expenditures.
Any expenditures made in connection with emergency
activities, including mutual aid activities, shall be deemed
conclusively to be for the direct protection and benefit of the
inhabitants and property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Section 10: Punishment of Violations.
It shall be a misdemeanor for any person, during
an emergency, to:
r1
U
(a) Willfully obstruct, hinder, or delay any memeber
of the emergency organization in the enforcement of any lawful
rule or regulation issued pursuant to this ordinance, or in the
performance of any duty imposed upon him by virtue of this ordinance.
(b) Do any act forbidden by any lawful rule or regula-
tion issued pursuant to this ordinance, if such act is of such a
nature as to give or be likely to give assistance to the enemy or
to imperil the lives or property of inhabitants of this City, or
to prevent, hinder, or delay the defense or protection thereof.
(c) Wear, carry, or display, without authority, any
means of identification specified b) the emergency agency of the
State. te
-5- 't3
Section 11: Severability.
• If any provision of this ordinance or the application
thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such
invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications,
and to this and the provisions of this ordinance are declared
to be severable.
Section 12
The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause
the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general
circulation, published in the City of Ontario and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of _ 1980
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-6- old
7
r�
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: William L. Holley, Director of Community services
FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney
DATE: April 18, 1980
RE: Proposed Emergency Services Ordinance.
I have reviewed the proposed Emergency Services Ordinance
which you forwarded to me with your memo dated April 3, 1980.
The first paragraph of Section 10 should be revised to
read as follows:
"It shall be a misdemeanor for any person, dur-
ing an emergency, to: ".
When the above revision has been made, you may consider
the Ordinance approved by the City Attorney's Office.
RED:sgg
Enclosures
rr J
,I
M E M O R A N D U M
. May 1, 1980
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services
Subject: Historic Preservation Ordinance 70 -D
The Historic Preservation Commission generates the request for an amendment
to the original ordinance.
There was more than one interpretation to Section 10, Subsections (c) and (d)
of Ordinance 70. 70 -D is drafted to eliminate that debate.
Briefly stated, the issue is whether or not the City Council is required
to hear all landmark matters heard by the Commission, whether recommended
for approval or not. (Unless appealed by the applicant to Council, a
denial should not be brought before Council. This has been discussed
several times, and the only remedy appears to be formal amendment.)
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
n
BI I /mw
I�
1`I
76
ORDINANCE No. 70 D
AN ORDINANCE OF TIIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, •
AMENDING SUBSECTIONS (c) AND (D) OF SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE
No. 70, CREATING AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COW41SSION TO ACT
IN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDENTIFICATION
AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS, EVENTS, STRUCTURES AND
SITES AND TO IDENTIFY PERSONS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE TO
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Subsection (c) of Section 10 of Ordinance No. 70,
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, is hereby amended to read:
(c) The application shall be referred to the
Historic Preservation Commission. The Historic Preservation Commission
shall hold a public hearing. The Historic Preservation Commission shall
recommend approval, modified approval or disapproval of the application.
SECTION 2: Subsection (d) of Section 10 of Ordinance No. 70
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, is hereby amended to read:
(d) In the event the Historic Preservation
Commission recommends approval or modified approval of an application,
the application and the report and recommendations of the Historic
Preservation Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council which shall
hold a public hearing on the application, following which the City Council
may approve, modify and approve, or deny the proposed designation. Approval
or modification and approval, of the designation shall be upon adoption of
an ordinance. In the event the Historic Preservation Commission recommends
disapproval of an application, no further action need be taken thereon unless
a notice of appeal is filed with the City Clerk within 10 days following the
action of the Historic Preservation Commission.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to
be published within.fifteen (15) days after its passage, as least once in
The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City
Of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
0
ATTEST: 7
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 7, 1980
TO: City Council
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ADOPTING POLICY FOR STREET DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
FOR LAND LOCKED PARCELS
On February 6, 1980, City Council reviewed a resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission regarding street development standards for land locked parcels. If
you will recall, the Council favored the Commissions' policy, however, the
City Council resolution failed to appear in the packet, therefore, the action
taken was in concurrence with the Planning Commission Resolution. Since the
Resolution was inadvertently left off the Agenda in February, the staff requests
that the City Council adopt said Resolution so that we can continue with the
preparation of an ordinance to impliment the same.
_ R tful fitted,
JACK LAM, Director of
Community Development
JL:cd
•
�1�
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, •
ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENT FOR ACCESS TO LANDLOCKED PARCELS
WHERE NO SUBDIVISION OCCURS
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council has requested that the
Planning Commission investigate the access necessary for landlocked parcels;
and
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission at its meeting of
January 23, 1980 recommended that the City Council establish requirements for
access to landlocked parcels where no subdivision occurs; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish guidelines for access to land-
locked parcels.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council
does hereby establish the following requirements for landlocked parcels where
no subdivision is occurring:
1. The owner /builder must provide proof of legal access to the property
in the form of a grant deed or in the form of a recorded easement.
2. The owner /builder must provide the City with an irrevocable offer of
dedication on his portion of that access for street purposes.
3. The owner /builder provide a lien agreement between the owner of the •
property and the City whereby that owner, or future owners of the
property, agree to improve the access across his property at the
time that the City determines it is warranted and that he pay for
and provide the plans for, those improvements at the time that
development is requested.
4. This procedure is allowed only for an owner /builder of one dwelling
unit where there is no subdivision of land.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7th DAY OF MAY, 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
M
l.J
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
f.
DATE: May 7, 1980
To: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer4l '
SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENT WAIVER REQUEST
Mr. and Mrs. Hoover are the owners of a "Land Locked Parcel" (Assessor's Parcel
No. 226- 022 -23). They approached the Engineering Staff with a request that the
City allow them to split the parcel into two lots without the requirement of
street improvements. The parcel now has two houses on it.
The Planning Commission and City Council have had a similar request made by Gary
Kortepeter. The Planning Commission, as a result of that request, passed a
Resolution (No. 79 -07) which requires a subdivider to provide a minimum of 40
feet of dedication and 26 feet of paving to the nearest maintained road. The
City subdivision Ordinance No. 28, Section 2.12(f) states that "off -site' im-
provements be constructed within nine months after a map is recorded for each
lot which has an existing building on it ". The Council is in the process of
approving rural road standards for "land locked parcels ". However, it has been
made clear, heretofor, that such standards would not apply to a subdivision of
lands.
The primary difference between this case and previous policy decisions by the
Council is that no buildable lots will be created by the subdivision.
Staff informed the owners that under Section 2.12(f) of Ordinance No. 28 (see
attached) the street improvements will be a condition of approval on the proposed
Parcel Map. The owners did not want to pay for the costs involved in preparing
a tentative map and the appeal fee both, in order to present their grievances
directly to Council.
COUNCIL ALTERNATIVES:
1. The Council can retain to current policy and require street improvements
through the property and 26 feet of paving to Highland Avenue.
2, The Council may waive the requirement of street improvements and require
the preparation of a lien agreement for future construction of improve-
ments.
3. The Council could require street improvements through the subdivided
property only.
• If the Council should elect the second alternative a revision to Ordinance No. 28
would be required to allow for this particular set of circumstances.
. 01
April 24, 1980
Edward H. Hoover
13703 Highland Ave.
Etiwanda, California 91739
.City of Rancho Cucamonga
Dept. of City Engineers
Post Office Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
RE: Waiver for Street Improvements
Project: Parcel 0228- 011 -23
Dear Sirs;
We have a parcel of land 300' x 330' with two (2) single family
dwellings. One family dwelling on 1.28 acres, one on 1 acre. We
would like to split the land only in this way, to obtain a separate
"Deed" for each parcel.
We have an overpass at the end of our dirt road, which at one
time (prior to the building of ISE Freeway) connected to Highland
Avenue. We now have to use a "right of way" through the vacant
property to the West of us in order to reach our dirt road. The dirt
road is blocked off on the South end by a Flood Control Reservoir.
We do not plan to build another house on our property, simply
because there is not the 11 acre required for a home available. The
two (2) single family dwellings are situated in or close to the center
of the lots described above. Therefore, we are asking Ear a waiver
for street improvements before we proceed with the cost of surveying,
etc. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Thank you for your time and concern. COMMUNITY DEVELOPM(Nf DEPT.
APR 28 1480
AN
Sincerely, 7181910111112111213141316 •
Edward H. Hoover
Encl: 1 /a
0
i
y 1�
/ � C
j
lb 'o)
(4) Street lights;
(5) Street trees;
(6) Concrete drive approaches; and,
•
J
(7) Reinforced concrete storm drains'
(b) The City Engineer may waive the requirement of
sidewalks for lots in Industrial Zones if he finds that such sidewalks
are cot necessary for public safety.
(c) The Citv Engineer may require Lite construction
of such other improvements which are, because of the nature, location,
or use of the property, necessary for the protection of public health
or safety.
(d) Unless the City Engineer finds that the cons-
truction of improvements is presently necessary for reasons of public
health and safety, or is a necessary prerequisite to the development. of
contiguous parcels, the construction of such improvements shall be post-
poned until such time as a permit or other grant of approval for the
development of a lot is issued.
(e) Any requirement for the construction of improve-
ments, and any postponement of such requirement, may he made on a lot by
lot basis for each lot in Lite subdivision.
(f) The Council hereby finds that it is necessary
for reasons of public health and safety that all off -site improvements
1w ilnslru<ited within a period of nine (9) months following the record -
•
y ati,,u of a parcel map for each lot upon which there exists a building
or other usable structure at the time of such recordation.
(g) No parcel map shall be transmitted by the City
Clerk, in accordance with subsection (a) of Section 66464 of the Govern-
ment Code, until either:
(1) All improvements which are required as a
condition of the approval of the parcel map, or the waiver thereof, other
than those improvements the construction of which has been postponed pur-
suant to subsection (b) of this section, have been constructed or the in
lieu fees have been paid; or,
(2) The subdivider has entored into an agree -
ment with the City providing for the construction of Lite improvements, at
the sul,6 ilor's expense, within a period of nine (9) months and has furn-
ished vecurity in connection with the performance of such agreement pur-
suant to tho provision. of Section 5.6 of Article 5 of this Ordinance.
SECTION 2.13. Waivers of Parcel flap.: Certiff`utes of Compliance.
(a) The City Engineer any waive the requirement for
a parcel map if all of the following conditions are met:
•
(1) The subdivider has requested a waiver ns
�-+ provided in this Article;
(2)� A field survey is not required;
0130 NO 21i f 3
f q,..h,.nr,.;..,,. ... ... t „i.,a
0
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -07
A RESOLUTION OF '1'IIE MANNING SO ?MISSION OF 111E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING SUBDIVISION
ACCESS IMPROVEMENT POLICY. f.
MIEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga
wishes to discourage the proliferation of private i pr 'i streets; and
L1IEREAS, it is necessary to establish firm policy guideline to
inform property owners of the City goals.
NOW, THEREFORE, RE IS RESOLVED AND ESTABLISHED, that as a condition
of npproval of any Parrel Hap, Parcel Map Waiver, Tract Hap or Lot Idne
Adjustment an n2plicant shall have access to a fully dedicated and mnintaine
Citv street. Where dedications and improvements To not esist, the applicant
shall. obtain a minimum of forty (40) feet of dedication and improve with
twenty -six (26) feet of pavement needed street frontage to reach the nearest
maintained City street.
Variations from this policy will require approval of tine City Engineer
of the City of Ranch, Cucamonga subject to appeals to the Planning Commission.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1979,
PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
•Herman Rempel, Chairman
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, ,lack lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and recularly Introduced,
Passed, and ndoptod by the Planning Cnmmissicni of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at
a regular meeting of tine Planning Commission held on the 24th day of January, 1979,
by the following vote to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GARCIA, TOLSTOY, JONES, RF11PEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: Crl`CIISS1O1Jh:RS: DAHL
laq
"suy�',� ^R ',:.- .� •N.1i�:;�ec• s4,:wbNf�d�.1,N;�`a.(A
}.:.�_ �✓
rya.
r; s SITE
1 ,, y
I' V �1
US
n 4 ir.9� AC c
•r
,r,�r, r.� � EII � fit•. :. .. .
1'95?A4 M /I• 195 AC
r
1
r
t i r AD A. _ 4 X10. A6 4 AC. 0 AC
r(� I 1.
}
i
,Ayr• '
.jr✓ .r. + hf�h�,
•
coy or FAi'61ID ('n,1P IOXGA
INITIAL. STUDY
f.
PART I - PROJECT T11MRMATION SHF,ET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submittr-d to the Development
Revict:' Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part TI of the Initial Study. The n,•ve l,.pn,on: !review
Committ -r will meet and tare action no later than ten
(10) (1;yr b0forc the public ni "tine at Ichi.ch time the
project .is to lie heard. Tho Committco will make one of
throe drternina t ions: 1) The project will have no
onvirorocontal impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an 1nvironmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE:
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: S?
NAME, AlliRFSS, TrTFrllONF OF PERSON TO HE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: _SGm,-. n[ Dhew.
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS ANT) ASSESSOR PARCEL. No.)
LIST hTIIt;R PrTH S NECIISSARY FROM LOCAL, RI]GIONAL, STATR AND
FEDFRAI, AGENCICS AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
I —I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
f.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT- 07` S�f
„7. 3 ac n 6& &.g r Alto 2 oa r«ir -
r
ACREAGR OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
B9FB BUILDINGS, IF ANY: ,7.3 Oe res
DF,SCRTPC THT FIVJTFONS'.,'PrAT, SCI'TTNG OF TIIR PROJECT SITE
INC1!1)ING TNFORMATION ON TOFOGPApHY, PI;'1ITTS (TREES),
ANIRIALS, ANY CULTURAL„ HISTOPTCAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OP SURPOUNDING PIIOPERTIES, AND THE DEFCRT.PT'ION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Do NOV )an IA h DT4gisrr6es
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumu)ati.ve actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
I- 2
• � l9ILL TIII.' +_PIjU,7 CC'I': '
TITS p)
• ✓ 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours? f.
2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
V/ 3. Create a subrtar.tial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)!
4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
✓ 5. licmove any existing trees? flow many?
6. Create the nerd for use. or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Expl.anetion of any Try answers above:
IPIPDRT:AW : If the project involves the construction of ...
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
Cl'RTlric: \'r MN: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above .PiO in the attached exhibits present the date and
inf.ormition required for this initial evaluation to the
best of rap al'ility. and that t.h^ fart'+, st:atemcnts, and
informntinn pr^r.entod are trio and correct to the best of
my ):noc:) Jgo and belief. I further understand that
addit .icmal infornatinn may hr rrquire..Q to he submitted
befolc nu a,lrquate evaulation can be made by the Devrh+pment
Review committee.
Date, -2-/.2 - 3fl Signature
Title
I3
1a�
RESTI)EN?ITL CO;ISI'111ICTI0°1
The foll.owinq information should be provided to the City of Rnncho Cucamonga '
Planning Division in order to aid in assos ^inn the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.:
Specific Location of Project:
1. Number of single
family units:
2. Number of multiple
family units:
3. Dale proposed to
begin construction:
4. Earliest date of
occupancy:
Model 4
and ? of Tentative
5. bedrooms Price Rance
PIIAGr, I PIIASE 2 PIIASIi 3 PIIASE 4 TOTI\L
J6?
T.- 4
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
r.
DATE: May 7, 1980
TO: City Council
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer�4-
SUBJECT: Parcel Map 5441
The Engineer (Linville- Sanderson -Horn) has on behalf of the owner (William
Schultz) appealed a condition of approval placed on Parcel 2 of Parcel Map
No. 5441.
The Engineering staff has followed the Ordinances established by the City.
We require that "prior to issuance of a Building Permit street improvements
will be required" along Summit-.
The problems presented with the requirement involve the existing, natural
terrain and street alignments. Note:
0 1. East Avenue needs to be realigned westerly as shown on the
attached sketch.
2. There is an existing earthen drainage swale on the south
side of Summit.
3. There is an existing drainage structure under East Avenue.
The Engineer has pointed out to staff that in order to perpetuate existing
drainage, a drainage pipe would be required behind the future curb location
for the full length of the property. The owner felt that it would be an un-
reasonable request due to the temporary nature of the dirt ditch and the
street alignment.
Staff has reviewed at length the options available. We feel that the Council
should be made aware of the problems. Therefore, in the interest of orderly
development, staff has requested the en;ineer and owner to come forward with
their petition. Staff is inclined to agree with the owner, however, we have
no options available to us other than to make these stringent requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve a lien agreement
against Parcel No. 2 that would require the street improvements concurrently
with the realignment of East Avenue.
Council is hereby recommended to authorize the City Attorney and the Engineering
staff to revise the City Subdivision Ordinance No. 28, thereby, updating the
is Ordinance to reflect changes in the State Map Act and to authorize the City
Engineer to make modification to street improvement requirements due to design
restraints.
))6
5•w/ /ni
Il
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 5441
In JM C.� CY .NCM Coewwrye"
:NR a ...nmw..n- n n!r -rsr.. r�[n? f n7, gmeA •�. � /.ew+w
rtiw� e•N". ti� n•eP �.vn. .n rS.�F f . M -0. va ! p. r
~�
M t•% %m n/' /H � MAIM �. »f1•��ir Cn ✓n/} Cb /., /nrri.n / ,,
•
'�
{/
-
��nS9vfry '..rte ��\ ice/
�•1 \i~\�!
M
0.F43 d/.
_. _� i
, 'n `
t
`/nv�N
� i •'
IFi
�
Iiwie..n 3•Yti +o•arlP
� i i
M -C I s.i /nf ..rw SeP /•e 'tn..�
mac..:
/�
k.� 4:+i. m,.., � •...., c i�w -.,.. sMm.. r
_ �
M�
•
W
e/`-uM P:x r..r.w (h /•t dv. ^y.; {hql Y•OAK Ae
T.e� /'af. p 4Gf.IG.
Po—j • e.6ai,4
.
mG1G • e.aee.rcr+c
vKrN /ry MGP
--
Il
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
0 MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 7, 1980
TO: City Council b City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID URBAN SYSTEM PROJECTS AGREEMENT FOR
RECONSTRUCTION OF BASE LINE BETWEEN VINEYARD AND HERMOSA AVE.
The attached supplement to the City's Federal Aid Urban Agreement with the
State for the Base Line reconstruction is for the purpose of providing
additional funds to the City. Under the supplement, the City's share of
the project, originally $39,171, will be paid by the new State funding.
As a result, the project will require only nominal captial expenditure by
the City if unforeseen expenses should be more than the 5% contingency
allowance.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
attached resolution authorizing the execution of Supplement 2 to Agreement
• 808 -5420.
Respectfully submitted,
Lloyd B. Hubbs
City Engineer
LBH:cd
Attachment
n
IIZ
STATE OF CAII FORNIA— BUSINESS AND TRA14SMRYATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Go .m
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT S. P. O. ROE 331
SAN BERNARDINO. CAIWORNIA 93403
March 28, 1980 08- SBd- 0-RCuc
M- R060(2)
Baseline Ave
Vineyard
to Hermosa
Mr. Lloyd Hubbs
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P..O. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr. Hubbs:
Attached for your execution are two copies of Supplement No. 2
under Local Agency -State Agreement No. 08 -5402 for the above
referenced PAC project. Rote that this agreement reflects the
use of State 169.1 matching funds.
Please type in the date of execution on each of the Agreements.
After execution, return all original agreements along with an
authorizing resolution to this office. After execution by the
District Director an original of each agreement will be returned
to you.
Should you desire additional information about these documents,
please call Mr. Fred Mielen at (714) 383 -4579.
Very truly yours,
J. E. PEDDY
District Director
Jo Feenatr�
Lo Assistance Coordinator
•
113
0
•
City m:
Local Agency. Rancho Cucamonga
Date.,_Mamh_l.2 1480
Suppierant 110. z
To Local Agency -State
Agreement No. 08-5420
PR0GRA ?!
OF
LOCAL hnx'1CY 'i EDPWL AID UM-V SVSICI Pi0JCCIS
IN ME
_CITY OF RAC3CBQ�LLCAMONGti_
Local Agency
Pursuant to the Federal Aid for Urban Systems Acts, the
attached "Program" of Federal Aid Urban System projects marked
"Exhibit B" is hereby incorporated in that Faster Agreement Z.'��J al
for the Federal -Aid Program which was entered into between the'.) o,
above named LOCAL AGENCY and the STATE on December 5, 1g79.,•�'�� t`,
and is subject to all of the terms and conditions thereor. VU3 c X.
The subject program is adopted in accordance with�Paragraph 2 n; A
of Article II of the aforementioned agreement under�aLthori
City /xxxxx)t Resolution fie. approved by City Counci L:
88xxxxxxx8xsxxxi:zHx1 on (See )copy attached),
Q�' C N
1r�
`
1 ✓`J�`
�
N � o L
X
CITY OF RANCHO CDC
` Local Agency
O
m
-' --
Title
N I��•
°t_
Apprwlcd for State Attest:
Clark-
7
a
�Er �
u�
District Director of Transportation Date
E
Ili strict fie_
I \L "v
Department of franspor tati on
V C
NC
Fomc DII -OLA -411 (2//9)
^IoN
1r�
Date: March 19, 1980
PR0GRAll
OF
;FExRR& AID �AAN SYSTEM PROJECTS
;% �-,,PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO,: 2
EXHIBIT B . .
Local Agency: CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Project No.
Location & Description
Jotal Cost Est.
Federal Funds
M atc n un s
M- RO60(2)
In the City of Rancho
- t
Cucamonga on Base Line
,,'`' CONST
UCTION ENGINEERING AND CONS
PRUCTION
Avenue from Vineyard
Avenue to Hellman Avenue
169,1
and Archibald Avenue to
', j l
Funds
Hermosa Avenue
$281,600
$242,429
$39,171
n
r /i
i
*local Agency Funds
unless otherwise
specified
JPeclal LOVenanL5 or K marRS: 1. All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the operation
of the improvements, referred to in Articl@.VI- MAINTENANCE of the
aforementioned Master Agreement will be performed by
The Cit of Rancho Cucamon a at regular intervals or as required
Fort a
1_ clent operation of the completed improvements.
DN -OLA -411 (5/77)
►..J
•
9
MIIBIT B - M-R060(2)
Page 2
2. 'the City of Rancho Cucamonga wil] :,Advertise, award and administer this project.
3. Unless determined otherwise by San Bernardino County's Cooperative Process Committee, the actual fords for
project will be set up on the basis of contract prices after the bids for the work have been opened. In to
- awarding or agreeing to award the contract;'Ghe City agrees the payment of Federal Fuels will obei mod a-
the Detail Estimate amount approved by the FHPA in the Federal -Aid Project Agreement (PR -2),
tion (PR -2A), and accepts any increases in City Funds. _
4. The use of Federal Funds for this project is subject to the project being selected as part of the oulti -year
FAu Program for San Bernardo County's portion of.the IA/Inng Beach Urbanized Area.
1. S. should higher priority projects cause increase or decrease to the Federal funds available, this project will
be financed with the maxiTan Federal funds available.to':the City.
6. Should additional Federal Funds became available to the City, this amount will, at the City's request, be
increased to the amount available bu funds. net to exr:eed the maxvmnm legal Federal prorates share with a cor-
responding decrease in the matching
7. The availability of Federal Fur ds will be subject to meeting deadjines and /or other conditions as may be
imposed by the Director upon the recommendation of the FAU Advisoryl/co mittee.
b� 8. The City share of matching funds will be 1008 of the amount ra}aining after Federal participation and 169.1
funds. `
9. The portion of the City fords required to match Federal Bighwey Funds in ".the project will be provided by the
State as authorized by Item B
169.1 of the udget Act of 1979 and allocata3, lrytl?s California Transportation
Cammission.
10. The 169.1 funds in the project will be as shown on Exhibit B.
11. In the event the Item 169.1 funds required are less than the amount shown in Exhibit�B.or the detail estimate,
the excess nay reve t to: (1) the county allocation provided the funds are released prior to June 30, 1980;
(2) county projects provided the funds are released prior to June 301 1982 and provid. ng;Qroject(s) contain-
ing Item 169.1 funds can utilize the released funds.
12. In accordance with Section 16309 of the Government Code, Item 169.1 funds may be available for expenditure
until June 30, 1982 unless otherwise provided by future budget act language.
13. The City may be required to report to the California Transportation Comnission concerning use of Item 169.1
funds and that the fords freed as a result of the receipt of Item 169.1 funds are eligible for street, road
and highway purposes.
•
City of
Local Age'w,,, Rancho Cucamonga
Date ...„ rrh 19�
SupOlemenL 80. 2
To Local Agency -State
Agreement Mo. 08 -5420
PR0GRA71
OF
.-:CAL 1,G0V i EEtRAL AID :,R2. ^a4 S iS i V RiNKi: S
Itl 11ic
_CITY OF RANCUQ_MC&N0NGA._
Local Agency
Pursuant to the Federal Aid for Urban Systems Acts, the
attached "Program" o, Federal Aid Urban System Projects Narked
"Exhibit 6" is hereby incorporated in that Master Agreement •?, Y`
for the Federal -Aid Program which was entered into between the a
above named LOCAL AGENCY and the STATE on Decembers 7_�, � z
and is subject to all of the terms and con Lions thereof. c
m a
The subject program is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2 r
• of Article II of the aforementioned agreement under authority of
City /xxxxxk Resolution On. approved by the City Council
B»xxxxXxx%xgxxxixaxs on (See copy attached). ? o
.a VN O
'Z
� u
Im �
CITY OF RANCHO CU
UCMQ GA 2 y
Local Agency v
a •c .,p p
gy v jS
a
'-
� nw r
Approved for State Attest:
Clerk
R
I ^
d
E v
iJi Strict Iliroctor of iransprrtation Data r.
Oistrict De_ >•."�', iix c
UeDartment of transportation
uW
J
Form DII -OLi -411 (2M)
P7
Date: March 19, 1990
PROGRAf1
CF
FEDERAL All) LWm SYSTEM PRoJEcrs
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO,: 2
EXIIIB17 B
Local Agency: CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Project No.
Location 6 Description
Total Cost Est.
Federal runds
Matching Funds*
M- R060(2)
In the City of Rancho
Cucamonga on Base Line
COMET
UCTION ENGINEERING AND CONS
rRUCTION
Avenue from Vineyard
Avenue to Hellman Avenue
and Archibald Avenue to
169.1
Hermosa Avenue
Funds
$281,600
$242,429
$39,171
' LOcal Agency funds
unless othervise
specified
Soecial Covenits
or Remarks! L All
i ntenance 1 1
1
OH -OLA -411 (5/77)
9
ma I nvo v ng the physical condition and the operation
of the improvements, referred to in Article VI MAINTENANCE of the
aforementioned Master Agreement will be performed by
The Cit of Rancho Cucamon a at regular intervals or as required
or a icient operat ono t e completed improvements.
r
•
0
MIBIT B - M- R060(2)
Page 2
2. The City of Rancho CXaMMa will advertise, award and administer this project.
3. Unless determined otherwise ]ry San Bernardino. Cooperative Process Committee, the actual funds for
project will be set up on the basis of contract prices after the bids or Federal have will pe linutgl to
awarding or agreeing to award the contract, the City agrees the payment
the Detail Estimate amount approved by the FI&M in the Federal -Aid Project Agreement (PR -2), or its mdifi
-Jon (PR -2A), and accepts any increases in City F unds.
q. The use of Federal Funds for this project is subject to the project Urbanized selecte as part of the malt' -year
FAU Program for San Bernardo County's portion of the IA/Ion4
S. should higher priority projects cause increase or decrease to the Federal funds available, this project will
be financed with the cmximm Federal funds available to the City.
6. Should additiona Federal unds beccm available to the City, this amt will, at the city's request, be
increased to theamunt avaFilaabl not to exceed the aximum legl Fderalprorata share
hare witha
cor-
responding decrease in the matching funds.
7. The availability of Federal Funds will be subject to meeting deadlines and/or other conditions as may be
imposed by the Director upon the recamiendation of the FAU Advisory committee.
8. The City share of matching funds will be 100% of the amount remaining after Federal participation and 169.1
funds.
9. The portion of the City funds required to match Federal Highway Fords to the project fora be provided t' the
State as authorized by item 169.1 of the Budget Act of 1979 and allocated by the California Trans�rtation
Commission.
10. The 169.1 funds in the project will be as shown on Exhibit B.
11. In the event the Item 169.1 funds required are less than the amunt shown an released prior the detail estimate,
2e county projects t to: e(1) t e county allocation
are released Provided thq
June 30, 1982eand p� d� pro7ect(s)3conta8ur
ing Item 169.1 funds can utilize the released funds.
12. In accordance with Section 16304 of the Goverrvent Code, 1 16
until June 30, 1982 unless otherwise provid by future ludgetactllanguage.y available for expenditure
169.1
13. The City may be required to report to the California Transportation Crnmission concerning use of Zten
funds and that the funds freed as a result of the receipt of Item 169.1 fords are eligible for street, road
and highway purposes.
0
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO.
08 -5420, SUPPLEMENT NO. 2
WHEREAS, The City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to take advantage of
additional state funding for there construction of Base Line Road; and
WHEREAS, said funding requires the execution of Local Agency -
State Agreement No. 08 -5420, Supplement No. 2 an authorized agent.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga approves the execution of Local Agency - State Agreement
No. 08 -5420, Program Supplement No. 2 and authorized and directs the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute said agreement on its behalf and transmit to the
State for processing.
• PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Sao
m
0 0 •
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5441
s Y tl i O l
+PIKE' ��POQE� 1
� �.�.� rrin.�n iyw•nrwn
y:
/iC /Nlr•( MpP
«�, n•.- ins
krna+�
L mer A,�rM*+ C
/n
fE.cal -T_ .G_• K.
1f��AL � 8.110 Apr'e6
[l
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 7, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs
SUBJECT: Approval of Contract for the Base Line Reconstruction Project
between Vineyard Avenue and Hermosa Avenue
Bids were opened on Friday, April 25, for the construction of the above
project, authorized for advertisement on March 19, 1980.
Seven bids were submitted and the low bid of $184,026 was 19% below the
consultant's estimate of $227,052. The project is to be entirely funded
with Federal and State funds. A summary of all bids is attached.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Council approve the low bid by Robert Escudero, Inc.
and authnrize execution of the contract by the City, and authorize funding of
the project plus 10% contingency and $1,-600 for construction staking.
• Respectfully submitted,
Lloyd Hubbs
LH:kds
Attachments
i•
pA
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •
SUIDIARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED
PROJECT H4SFTTNF -%VFUE PrCONSTRUCITON Pu IEPT
LOCATION 14EST OF GARNET STREET_TO_FAST OF LION STREET ANn ARCHIRn n AV mfF
TO WEST OF CAMBRIDGE AVENUE
1AT. April 25, 1980
CONTRACT NO. FAU V-32k (2)
1 TEMS
QUANTITIES
Roberi Escudero,lnc
Bid dmount
Laird Construction
Bid i,maunC
F. I.. Yen er Canst.
Ifid Amount
Fontana Pav
Bid A,.i.ont
Bid Amount
Crow
Bid
Bidder's Bond
Clearing and Grubbing
LUMP SUN
LS
3,500.00
3,500.00
,000.00
7,000.00
19,000
19,000.00
10,000
10,000.00
5,300
5,300.00
11,400
Roadway Excavation
1,606
CY
11.00
17,666.00
4.4
7,066.40
10.00
16,060.00
4.05
6,504.30
3.50
5,621.00
7.0
Remove Existing Asphalt
4,370
SF
1,660.6
.9
4,151.50
.60
2,622.00
.30
1,311.00
1.00
4,370.00
.5
Pavement
.3
(Clas. 2 Aggregate Base
1.2 - feet thick)
4,217
SF
1.4
5,903.80
.5D
2,361.52
1.00
4,217.00
1.05
4,427.85
1.00
4,217.00
Class 2 Aggregate Base
0.5 - foot thick)
0,640
SF
.36
3,830.40
.2
2,553.60
60
6,384.00
.50
5,320.00
.30
3,192.00
.4
Pavement Reinforcing
4,315
BY
1.6
6,904.0
2.8
12,082.00
2.0
8,630.00
2.00
8,630.00
2.00
8,630.00
1.5
Fabric
Reset Roadside Sign
2
EA
100.0c
200.0
80.0
160.00
150.00
300.00
150.00
300.00
50.00
100.00
50.0
Asphalt Concrete Pavement
5,270
TOD
25.5E
134,806.6
26.8
141,236.00
21.4C112,778.00
25.60
34,912.00
28.50
150,195-00
27.7-146
Concrete Cross Gutter
(incl. lntergral Curbs)
510
SF
5.5C
2,805.0
3.7
1,912.50
6.0
3,060.00
4.10
2,091.00
4.20
2,142 00
3.5
Place Asphalt Concrete
535
LF
3.0
1,605.0
2.8
1,498.00
2.0
1,070.00
2.00
1,070.00
3.00
1,605.00
4.0
Dike
Reconstruct Existing Asphalt
Concrete Driveway (0.17' -
208
SF
1.0
208.0
1.0
208.00
2.0
416.00
3.00
624.20
1.00
208.00
2.0
Foot Thick)
Reconstruct Existing Concre[
4.0
648.0
486.00
4.0
648.00
4.1
664.20
4.00
648.00
2.5
_
Driveway (0.50 foot thick)
162
SF
3.0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SU!LIMY OF PROPOSALS OPENED
BASE LINE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
LOCATION WEST OF GARNET STREET TO EAST OF LION STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE
DATE April 25, 1980
CONTRACT NO. FAU M- R060(2)
ITEHS
QUANTITIES
Robert Escudero Inc
Bid Amount
Laird Construction
Bid Amount
E.L. Yeager Const.
Bid Amount
Fontana Pavin
Bid Amount
Schramm & halters
Bid Amount
Crowell 6
Bid
Bidder's Bond
189
SF
I.Or
189.00
.4C
75.60
2.0
378.00
1.00
189.00
.75
141.75
1.00
Regrade Fixating Driveway
UMP SUN
IS
3,500.0
3,500.00
40O.00
4,400.00
10,000
10,000.00
8,0000
8,000.00
4,000
4,000.00
7000
Naintaining Traffic
Reconstruct Existing Fence
LUMP SUN
IS
600.0
600.00
900.0
900.00
1,000
1,000.00
3, 800.0
3,800.00
500
500.00
850
(Wood Split -Rail)
84,026.40
86,091.12
86,563.00
$187,843.35
$190.869.75
19-
TOTALS
I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SL^GL1RY OF PROPOSALS OPENED
PROS--C- 11,1c11 TNr xian-E asn ' a
_ .vrnIHAID AVEHIIE_
_
LOCATION 'E4 OF C4RYFT STREET 70
TO WEST OF CAMBRIDGE AVENUE
ENGINEER'S
Liberty Constructio ESTIMATE
ITEMS QUANTITIES Amount Sid jm.,int
Bid Amount Bid
I
Bidder's Bond
LUMP SUt
LS
24,000
24,000.0
27,000
27,000.00
Clearing and Grubbing
1,606
I CY
8.00
12,848.0
6.25
10,038.00
Roadway Excavation
Remove Existing Asphalt
4,370
SF
6,000.00
6,000.0
.35
1,530.00
Pavement
Class 2 Aggregate Base
4,217
SF
.76
3,204.9
.90
3,195.00
(1.2 - feet thick)
Class 2 Aggregate Base
10,;40
SF
.38
4,043.2
.40
4,256.0(
0.5 - foot thick)
Lm
vemenc Reinforcing
4,315
SY
2.10
9,061.5
2.00
8,630.0(
Fabric
2
EA
200.00
200.0
100.00
200.01
Reset Roadside Sign
5,270
TON
26.00
137,020.0
30.00
158,100.01
Asphalt Concrete Pavement
Concrete Cross Gutter
510
SF
5.25
2,677.5
4.95
2,525.01
(incl- Intergral Curbs)
Place Asphalt Concrete
535
IF
3.50
1,872.5
3.40
1,819.0
Dike
Reconstruct Existing Asphalt
208
S
2.00
416.0
1.20
250.0
Concrete Driveway (0.17' -
Foot Thick)
Reconstruct Existing Concret
162
5
5.0
610.0
2.5
405.0
'rivevav (0.50 foot thick)
0
aiTE April 25, 1980
ro::Ta -ACT va. FA'J M- R060(2)
Bid
Bid Amoun[ Bid _ dmovnt
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SU:t,tARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED
PROJECT BASE LINE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
WEST OF GARNET STREET TO EAST OF LION STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE
LOCATION
L
ENGINEER'S
Liberty Conscruccio ESTIMATE
LTE`1S QCAHTITI ES Amur
Bid Amou nc
Rid Amount Sid - Amo
I
Bidders Bond
Regrade Eixsting Driveway
Maintaining Traffic
Reconstruct Existing Fence
(Wood Split -Rail)
TOTALS
1B9 SF 289.00 289.00
LUMP S LS 3,800.00 3,800.00
LUMP 5 LS 3,200.00 3,200.00
442.6,
95.
7,000.
1,409.
$227,052.01
.I I + I 1 0
DATE April Z5,.1980 _
C06TRACT NO. FAU 14 -R06_ 0(2)
Bid Amount I Bid Anounc ' Bid
. MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 2, 1980
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Request for ditional Office Space
Currently the City offices are contained within two buildings: the main
building fronting on Baseline and the rear building. The main building
contains Administration, Finance, Community services, and the Building
Division. The rear building contains the Planning Division and Engineering
Division. One of the most active functions in the City is the Building
Division which handles Building permit issuance, plan checking and building
complaints. It now occupies the majority of the corridor space in the main
building and its space needs do not provide for the best service. There
is no further roan for expansion of plan storage and plan checking facilities.
Furthermore, its level of activity creates a very difficult working environ-
ment for the other departments because of its unrelated nature and activity
. it creates. Moreover, its current separation from the other two divisions
of the Community Development Department results in less than desirable
coordination between the three related functions. There is a need for
both unifying the Community Development Department to combine its related
functions in one location and to have additional space to accommodate
additional service needs.
1]
Currently the unit next to the Engineering function is available and the
City has negotiated a perspective lease with the owner. The new unit con-
tains approximately 2,800 square feet of office space including restroom
facilities. This opportunity now affords the possibility to achieve the
above at a unit cost of 34 a square foot, a very reasonable rent. The
addition of this space would not only allow the relocation of the Building
function but would provide space for personnel that has been hired for the
OTS traffic safety grant. In total this 2,800 square feet will accommodate
17 individuals plus equipment and plan storage. Such accommodations would
only meet the needs of the above and does not increase the existing indi-
vidual space standard. This additional space would require the demolition
of some walls and the addition of electrical facilities to accommodate
the function.
11 f
Continued.....
Request for Additional
Office Space -2- May 2, 1980 •
In addition, staff wants to request that modifications be made to the
main building to accommodate proposed staffing increases in Community
Services and Finance and provide for the construction of three offices.
Staff would bid the work out to achieve the least costly price for these
improvements. The above work is anticipated to cost no more than
$13,500 with staff doing the demolition work.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the
signing of the lease for the additional unit of space and approve the
expenditure from the contingency fund not to exceed $13,500 for modi-
fications necessary to accomplish the relocation.
LMW /vz
11
•
. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 7, 1960
TO: City Council
FROM! Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Acquisition of Maintenance Facility
The Engineering Division in conjunction with the Finance Department has
been exploring options for the provision of a Maintenance Corporation
Yard to house the men and equipment for the Public Works function. The
most cost effective approach would l,e to ncc current �aintenanre
facility being utilized by the County crew. This yard is located at
Ill North Grove Avenue just south of Ninth Street.
The yard contains a house completely fenced, with garages, an office
building, storage sheds, and gas pumps with 2 - 2,000 gallon tanks on
• a lot of over one acre. The County has offered to sell the facility to
the City for $127,000.
The only alternative available to the City would be acquisition and
development of a new facility at an alternative location. Preliminary
exploration indicates that suitable sites would involve considerable land
and development cost and time to prepare. The County site could be
occupied immediately and contains all of the facilities which would be
required for the maintenance operation. The proposed sale price is more
than reasonable and the City would have little trouble disposing of the
site at such time as a permanent facility could be developed.
The property will also generate revenues through the rental of the house
located on the site. In addition, arrangements could be made with the
tenant to provide caretaker responsibilites for the facility and assist
in preventing vandalism.
The County facility is located in close proximity to the Sheriff's Office
and provides the opportunity to supply fuel to the Sheriff's vehicles at
a considerably reduced price. This would, however, require the installation
of an additional fuel storage tank and pumps at an estimated cost of
$10,000. This cost would be recouped through savings during the first year.
Continued...
lJ
ia9
City Council re Maint. Yard
May 7, 1980
Page 2
The Finance Director has indicated that the facility should be purchased
from the City's facility fund.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council approve acquisition
of the Upland Road Yard and authorize $137,000 from the facilities fund
for acquisition of the facility and installation of gas storage and
pumping equipment.
Respectfully s fitted
ub ,
Llo B. Hobbs
City Engineer
LBH:hlc
130
lJ
•.
•
L
:25 East Third Street • San Bernardino, CA 92415 • 17141 383. 3336
n
U
April 23, 1980
Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs, Civil Engineer
Community Development Department
Engineering Division
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RE: SPR- 0148 -I
Old Upland Road Yard
111 North Grove
Dear Mr. Hubbs:
of San
ROBE AT K MEEKS, Ow..,
R..l P,oMny Oiv icon
6d 5R,rIINC�®
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
APR 24 1980
AM PM
71819110111112111213141516
A
In response to your letter of April 18, 1980 concerning
the above property, we can advise that we ha•,e an appraisal
of $127,000.00 for the land and improvements.
The most recent sale terms approved by the Board of Super-
visors provide for 40% down payment and the balance payable
at 18 or more per month with the balance all due and payable
in ten years.
Such a sale would be as follows:
Sale Price $127,000.00
Down Payment - 50,800.00
Balance secured by a
purchase money deed
of trust $ 76,200.00
Payable at $762.00 or more per month,
including interest at 11�% per annum,
all due and payable in 10 years.
We would recommend a sale with these minimum terms to the
Board,
Please let me know if we may draw a purchase agreement and
your timetable for this acquisition.
Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs
April 23, 1980
Page Two �•
I will be pleased to meet with you to further discuss this
matter if you desire.
You very truly,
G -,- K. HHN�,
Real Property Agent
GKH:mil
13;1
•
INTER - OFFICE MEMO
IDATE April 8, 1980 w`i nOA wuo
• FROM Thomas Wickum, Captain PHONE 989 -6611
Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station
TO Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT Possible Procurement of Gasoline Tank and Pump
Pursuant to our discussion pertaining to the procurement of
our own 10,000 gallon gasoline tank and pump, I have contacted
Mr. Jim Covey of N. B. Covey, Incorporated, 350 East Commercial
Avenue, Pomona, 623 -2502. I have received a preliminary cost
estimate for the necessary equipment_, which is outlined below.
1. 10,000 Gallon Tank (New) $ 4,700.00
2. Keyed Pump (New $ 1,450.00
3. Installation Fee $ 4,000.00
TOTAL $ 10,150.00
Mr. Covey advised that his company does not have any reconditioned
• tanks and pumps at this time. These items will be available in
June or July. This would reduce the approximate cost by half.
The current cost of gasoline is approximately $1.33 per gallon.
I would suggest that a local wholesaler be contacted to determine
the cost of gasoline purchased in large quantities. I think
that we may be able to purchase gasoline for 90 to 95 cents per
gallon.
1W
TW: jas
E
) 33
��gBG
-A
rq W°- lk$ '
k u3
-,, Mrs'
z'A;
A��
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
F.
DATE: April 30, 1980
TO: City Council
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: TRACT NO. 9193 and 9262
The subject tracts were tentatively approved by the County. Both tracts (No.
9193, 35 lots, on 6 -17 -76 and No. 9262, 46 lots, on 5- 20 -76) are located east
of vineyard and north of Base Line.
The developer (William -Lyon Company) has prepared and submitted bonds and
agreements which are sufficent in nature to insure orderly development of the
Tracts.
AMOUNT
Tract No. 9193
Performance (road) $69,600
Labor and Material (road) 69,600
Tract No. 9262
Performance (road) $136,800
Labor and Material (road` 136,800
The developer has made financial arrangements with the Cucamonga County Water
District for the installation of water and sanitary sewer systems.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached Resolutions
approving tract No. 9193 and Tract No. 9262.
The Resolution authorizes: 1) the Mayor to sign the Agreement on behalf of the
City; 2) the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the maps and; 3) to forward the
maps to the County Recorder.
Respectfully submitted,
Llo d B. Hubbs
City Engineer
LBH:cd
35
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO •
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9262
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 9262, consisting of
forty -six (46) lots, submitted by William Lyon Co., Subdivider, located
on the east side of Vineyard, south of Base Line, has been submitted to
the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said
City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California,
and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said
City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered
the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution
by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security,
and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for
public use the streets delineated thereon:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows;
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved •
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said
City, the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and,
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient,
subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City
Attorney; and,
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating
same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute
the certificate thereon on behalf of said City.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 19.
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erg k
3l
•
• RESOLUTION NO. 80 -41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9193
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 9193, consisting of
thirty -five (35) lots, submitted by William Lyon Co., Subdivider,
located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Base Line, has been
submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved
by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of
California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28
of said City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered
the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution
by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security,
and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for
public use the streets delineated thereon:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows;
• 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said
City, the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and,
n
That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient,
subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City
Attorney; and,
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating
same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute
the certificate thereon on behalf of said City.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 19,
ATTEST:
Lauren M, Wasserman, City C erk
I37
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ease tiNT� TRHC2- 3793 = ` 9262 I I;
0 LA
to - � �.f ". ';2 "D i .2.�- °,a 'r.•.� ";�t.-.;•,. �rY / ;;,v• . 3. 1
0 3S "zc ;b. 'as d� c t r, �\ -,r. 6''F / •/ ti� I
rf
is
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 7, 1980
TO: City Council
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP No. 5687
The attached resolution is for the final approval of the subject Parcel Map.
It is located at the northeast corner of Base Line and Rochester consisting
of 2 parcels on 24 acres.
The map was prepared at the request of Edward Feduniw. He is selling 16+
acres of his lot so that it can become a residential development in accordance
with the General Plan.
The map has been plan checked under the new contract by the City with C G
Engineering Company. It is technically correct and complies with the State
. Map Act and the City Ordinances.
There are no improvement requirements applicable at this time.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council adopt the attached Resolution
authorizing t e City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the
City. The City Engineer can then have the map forwarded to the County for
recording.
Respectfully submitted,
` L � yd B. Hubbs ,
City Engineer
LBH:cd
Attachment
1,
)3�
• RESOLUTION NO. 80-42
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5687
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5687)
WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 5687, submitted by
Linville- Sanderson -Horn and consisting of two (2) parcels, located
at the northeast corner of Base Line and Rochester, being a division of
S.E. k of S.E.k, Sec. 31, T.I.N., R.6W. was approved by the City
Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 5687 is the final map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 5687 be and
the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to
present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
111 A
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
A
z k
bK
O
`s
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 56117
�.:2.'. ,.. ..nni."..�Fn..k°r." <;•,uLe :r LCn"`w'�a++n s'3'��.':..i " ".;,..'.6;': ,1:'r,...
£X,TIHS ZOHIHS' b•1
s£,1£HA: PLAN: iow H£sID£HT,A6
• • •
1
V
I I
sI
�N
bo .'
I
p..
I
_ rn-
� N
a
Its
���
f `= '- �:,`�� �•. tit,sTIH6, 2oli'�1H�: ri•�
/ 1
i � �� 1
�
• • •
1
V
p..
_ rn-
� N
a
• • •
1
V
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
r.
DATE: May 7, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP NO. 4511
The attached resolution authorized the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign
the above mentioned Parcel Hap. The Developer is Buster Filpi. The map
consists of 10 parcels located on the southeast corner of Base Line and
Carnelian Street.
The map has been completed and is now ready for filing with the County Recorder.
Faithful Performance (road) $102,000
Labor 8 Material (road) $102,000
• RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map and
forward it to the County Recorder.
Respectfully submitted,
L1 d B. Hub
City Enigneer
LBH:cd
18
)41
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -43 •
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4511,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.4511)
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, tentative Parcel Map No. 4511 submitted by Buster Filpi,
and consisting of ten (10) parcels, located south side of 9th Street,
west of Archibald, being a division of the Map of Rancho Cucamonga was
approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on August 28,
1919; and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 4511 is the final map of the division
of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable
improvement security by Buster Filpi as developer;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and
said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same •
are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map Number 4511 be and the
same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present
same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
•
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk )
. ..... STREET
0
QLQ,
TENTATIVE MAP
NOT
WT
PARCEL MAP NO
A
i p
PART
4511
ft,.1 3
PIK 1528
F(
RAILR
SANTA
-jT AjSON TOPEKA 8 -S
0
51,
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCA"ONGA
'A"
pm 2263
QLQ,
NOT
WT
A
i p
PART
P071 9
F(
RAILR
SANTA
-jT AjSON TOPEKA 8 -S
0
51,
i p
STATE Of CALIFORNIA -BUNNE S AND TRANSRORTAGON AGENCY EDMUND G BROWN JR., G-nm
DEPA;.TMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT B, I.O. BOX 23I
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA WM
March 28, 1980 08- SBd- O -RCuc
M- R060(2)
Baseline Ave
Vineyard
to Hermosa
Mr. Lloyd Hubbs
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr. Hobbs:
Attached for your execution are two copies of Supplement No. 2
under Local Agency -State Agreement No. 08 -5402 for the above
referenced FAD project. Note that this agreement reflects the
use of State 169.1 matching funds.
Please type in the date of execution on each of the Agreements.
After execution, return all original agreements along with an
authorizing resolution to this office. After execution by the
District Director an original of each agreement will be returned
to you.
Should you desire additional information about these documents,
please call Mr. Fred Mielen at (714) 383 -4579.
Very truly yours,
J. E. PEDDY
District Director
Coordinator
03
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 29, 1980
r.
To: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Enginee `W-
SUBJECT: Vacation of a Portion of 19th Street (Rte 30) at Ramona Avenue
The attached letter and map refer to a request by Vanguard Companies to
vacate a portion of 19th Street in order to clear title on a piece of
property to which the City owns an underlying fee. Since CalTrans has
previously vacated this portion, there is no longer a need for public
use and maintenance.
The attached Resolution of Intent to vacate the street will begin the
public hearing process required by law.
LBH:jaa
Attachments
VANGUARD COMPANIES
9211 ARCHIBALD AVE. • CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 • (714)987-6376
April 8, 1980
Mr. Paul Rougeau, Assistant City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
RE: 19th d Ramona
PM 3713
Dear Mr. Rougeau,
This letter will constitute as a formal request to begin abandonment
procedures on Parcel No 2 of the above referenced project.
The property was vacated by the State of California some time ago.
Therefore, we cannot foresee any complications.
We are enclosing a Title Report indicating the property in question.
If there are any questions or if additional information is required,
please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Sincerely,
Vanguard
WE.1 /cs
encl.
Development
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 6, 1980
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
SUBJECT: Request For Fun From Jaycees
The Rancho Cucamonga Jaycees have requested a sum of approximately $500.00
to help support Miss Rancho Cucamonga's participation at the Orange Show
in San Bernardino. If the City Council is inclined to grant support, we
would suggest the following requirements:
I. Payment will be made upon presentation of receipts for
all expenditures.
2. The amount shall not exceed $500.00 or whatever amount the
Council determines is appropriate, if any.
While the involvement of Miss Rancho Cucamonga at the Orange Show is of
some benefit to our Community, the Council should be concerned about receiving
similar requests from other agencies. Also if the Council approves funding,
it is safe to assume that you will receive a similar request annually from
the Jaycees for assistance.
LMW /vz
ill
RANCHO CUCAMONGA JAYCEES
9590 Foothill Boulevard
Rancho Cucamonga, California
91730
May 6, 1980
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Post Office Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730
ATTN: Lauren Wasserman, City Mgr.
Dear Lauren: RE: Miss Rancho Cucamonga
As you know, Tammy Bruce was selected as Miss Rancho Cucamonga.
She has been asked to represent our city at this year's Orange
Show in San Bernardino. The Jaycees have given her quite a bit
financial support for the Orange Show, but unfortunately the
Jaycees funds have all but run out. We are therefore asking the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to allocate .$500 for the support of
Tammy at the Orange Show, since she does represent out city.
If you have any q +xestions regarding this matter, please contact
mie at Wilmington Savings and Loan or David Humphrey at the Chamber
of Commerce.
Very truly
MARK E. DENNI
Rancho Cucamonga Jaycees
May 7, 1980
City of Rancho Cucamonga
93 "0 Baseline Road
"rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
TO: Members of the City Council and City Staff:
have decided to make some comment on the proposed shopping center
site at Lemon and Haven, because I feel strongly that we must clarify
those things which we are trying to protect as a City in regards to
future development.
I.n. the discussions the Citizens' Advisory Committee of the General
Plan has had on shopping centers, we have expressed some serious
concern as to the location and mix of the centers as well as their
design and incorporation into the circulation pattern of the City,
I feel the following points can be made regarding shopping centers
in Rancho Cucamonga:
In order to provide affordable leasing programs, land must be
acquired and constriction and permanent funding obtained at
the lowest costs. This takes planning in advance on the best
sites possible.
Often these sites will not appear ready for development but
can within two to three years be prime sites which will fulfill
an existing need. Since the planning and lease negotiation
often, can and will take two years at least, sites will come
up for approval two years or more prior to their actutal devel-
opment and occupancy.
The monetary risk involved in committing to a site and the
expenditures that go into the design and approval stages are
prohibitive to all but the test building firms, and they need
the cooperation of the City to see that these efforts will
lead Lc a development that is economical to build, affordable
to lease, and satisfactory to the needs of the consumers within
the community.
Centers can fulfill the esthetic and even recreational needs
of a community by providing landscaping and buffering treat-
ments between existing residential
communities and the center, by provid-
e ing access and internal circulation
�v ; r for the pedestrians within the
• ,
4 7224 Footh,u Blvd Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • (714) 9871732
To: City Council and Staff
Re: Shopping Centers
May 7, 1980
Page 2
center, and by providing the proper mix of tenants to serve the
'needs of the community.
With the potential market in our community, a shopping center can
be a profitable venture for both the developer and the community,
and I would hope Rancho Cucamonga would foster the healthy growth
of commercial enterprises within its boundaries.
With these factors in mind I would like to offer my support to the
efforts made by Scott Bell of Watt Commercial Properties to deal with
the buffering treatment of his proposed center. I also offer nd
opinion that while the site may seem premature, it is not, and the
City will only benefit by having a company such as this begin the
planning of the shopping center now, to minimize lease rates at the
time of occupancy and to work with the local residents to see that
traffic and esthetic considerations are dealt with effectively as it
appears through their project report.
I would also hope that arguments against this project along the lines
of preserving exisiting views and open space in the form of vineyards,
is not reasonable. This land is expensive and it needs to derive its
economic worth both for the owner and the City. If it is properly
designed, it will still provide the esthetic atmosphere and serve the
consumer needs of the community.
JS:an
Thank you for your consideration
of these points,
r-N X9"
Jeff Sceranka
LUCAS LAND CO,
COUNCIL: These minutes were inadvertently omitted from the Agenda. They are
back up information for Public Hearing item 5A.
PUBLIC BEARING
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ZONE CHANGE N0. 80 -02 - WATT IN_O11STRIE5 - Chang6
From R -3 to C -1 for property located on the east side of llaven Avenue between
Lemon and Highland.
Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Staff recommends
that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 80 -05 which recommends
approval of 'Lone Change No. 80 -02 and issuance of a Negative Declaration to
the City Council, Staff further recommends that if the zone change is approved
that the following conditions be added to Resolution No. 80 -05: 1) That the
zoning revert back to the original zone after a one year period if the applicant
is not successful In obtaining building permits for the project. 2) The
zone change would cover the area starting at the north of Leman Avenue south to
within 250 feet north of the centerline of Highland Avenue. The Caltrans right -
of -way is not to be changed to C -1. If at a later time the freeway does not go
in then there would be an opportunity to come in and re -zone that area.
Commissioner Jones asked if we are currently reaching saturation point on commer-
cial centers.
Mr. Vairin stated at this point we are merely considering a zone change for the
property and its appropriateness for the potential of a shopping center.
Comn issfoner Garcia asked if the applicants have considered the entire 80 acres
in their planning.
Mr. Lam stated at the present time the applicant is pursuing the center portion
of the property. Their intention is to have a planned development with combina-
tion A -P type use and perhaps condominium type uses. Both uses are allowable
under the mixed use designation of the General Plan.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing.
Mr. Scott Bell, representing Watt Commercial Properties, stated they have reviewed
the staff report and are in concurrence with that report. They are pursuing the
Zone Change in order for the zoning to be in conformance with the General Plan.
Clara Velez, 10522 Lemon Avenue, stated there are 34 homes within her tract and they
all share one thing In common - their desire to preserve the residential neighbor-
hood. They chose to live in a smill community below the foothills for their
children to play. They deliberately did not want to move into an area next to
commercial development. it is fell more emphasis should he placed on the needs
and denit'cz of the rc,ddvats in the area. A shopping cooler would he very nego-
live for the arr a. Ihere are currently many vacant shops within this City in
existing ;:hopping centers. In a quick survey of eight ecntcrs, 37 shops were
vacant. She Suhmitled a list of residents willing to unrk toward keeping their
community residential.
.lo Ann Barns, 10570 Leman, submitted a petition signed by residents of the area
In opposition to the x0110 Change. Their main concerns are: the safety of their
children, rcologic,l impact, the community impact, the deterioration of property
surrounding shopping centers, the proximity to sales of liquor and the misuse
of liquor sales by Chaffey students and the proximity of liquor sales to school
bus stops.
Planning Commission Minutes -3- February 25, 1980
Mr. Fred Sherman, 6225 Dakota, stated an environmental assessment was included
in the staff report which has assessed no impact to the residential area sur-
rounding this zone change. However, there is nothing to back up those ednclusiori
He finds it hard to believe there would be no impact due to the increase of traffic
in the area. There will also be trucks to stock the stores and a lot of this will
be done at night. Development of a center would cause a lot more noise and traffic
problems in the area. There could also be a significant increase in the crime rate.
We already have an overburdened police department without enough personnel to pro-
tect the entire area. Commercial development in this area will cause a drop in
real estate values. The entire appearance of the area is going to change from
residential to commercial. He asked that the Commission consider rejection of
the zone change. If a rejection 1s not given he asked that at least a 30 day
postponement be given so that they my be given a little more time to assess
the impact this is going to have on the area.
Mr. Roland Smith, 6235 Valinda, stated the reason he moved to this area was to
get away from commercial development surrounding the residential. He would like
this area to remain residential. He moved out here for peace and quiet and does
not want another Montclair Plaza. There is a large area to the City which could
be zoned commercial.
n
Mr. Steve Heimann, 10423 Cartilla, stated he moved from Los Angeles to come to this
city. They moved to this area because of the value of property and the serene,
pleasant atmosphere of the area. The effect of a shopping center in this area is
going to be very damaging. lie is concerned of the increased crime rate. The
impact of commercial would have a detrimental effect on the children in the area. ^
Looking at this project he does not see how the City will benefit.
Mr. Dave Tanner, 6563 Valinda, stated commercial areas should definitely be kept
separate from the residential areas. He bought his home in this particular area
due to the fact there was all residential development in the area. At the present
t Imo, he can see the mountains from his home; however, if a shopping center is
developed it will block his view.
Mary McNamee, stated she moved to this area from Downey, She lived next to a
Junior High School and off of two major streets. It was not the kind of area
you would want your children to grow up around. She moved here for the peace
and quiet. She does not want her children to live in an area where they are
afraid to walk out their front door.
Mr. David Delgado, 6646 Mesada, stated there are many people in the audience here
In opposition to the zone change. It is his opinion the people that live to the
area should have some s.1v as to what is developed around them. More schools and
parks are needed in the City Instead of commercial development.
Chairman Rompel stated the City has no control over the schools na the school
district is an en[itoly separate entity. The City has worked since incorporation
to get schools and their problem solved. The City is trying to find funding
for schools.
I
Mr. Robert Todd, 6212 Carrillo Avenue, stated this City needs street sweepers
and needs to lake care of draivage prchlome• Wo need to take care of what 1s
currently in the City before new cumnmrclal Is developed. We also need more
parks.
Planning Commission Minutes -4- February 25, 1980
Chairman Rempel stated the City currently does lot bove the money for parks,
street sweepers, etc. Who is going to pay for the parks? It is up to the citizens
of the community to wrk with the school district and agree to pay highep taxes
to have new schools.
Mr. Mark Whitehead, 6542 Vallnda, stated he is In opposition to the zone change
and can not see a need for commercial development in this area.
Chairman Hempel stated this Commission can not deny a developer to come in and
submit a zone change request_ That is why the zone change is before the Commis-
sion for public hearing.
Mr. Jack Sylvester, applicant, stated in 1966 a shopping center permit was
granted for this area on Haven and Highland. Lemon Avenue at that time was
abandoned by the County of San Bernardino. He made it possible for the people
to develop Lemon Avenue so they could comply with County requirements to have a
60' wide street. When John Blayney was retained as the General Plan Consultant
he recommended at one time that the entire 80 acres be a regional shopping center.
Only when he discovered that 14 odd acres could be taken for a right of way for
the proposed Foothill Freeway and interchange on that corner was it downgraded to
a community shopping center area. He then found in going to the Planning Staff
that although Caltrans notified him in writing that they would not stand in the way
of development, it was suggested that he move any commercial site to Lemon Avenue
and that be voluntarily agree to a CC 6 R prohibiting access or egress on Lemon
Avenue for any commercial project. He raised no opposition and voluntarily agreed
to sign the CC 6 R's. Their project, as proposed, will not block anyones view
of the mountains. Their buildings would not exceed 22' in height. The Planning
Division will also insist on a landscaping buffer on Lemon Avenue and they will do
their best to screen any unpleasant aspects that may arise. They are not proposing
any development that is not in the best interest of the City. They are prepared
to sit down with any committee to work out anything which is fair and reasonable
that is in the best interest of the community.
President of Watt Commercial Properties, stated for the people in the audience,
he would like to state that the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted one of the
strictest development standards within Southern California. In regard to property
values, the homes built around their existing developments have increased in
value. With the adoption of Proposition 13, one of the few remaining items left
to create income for a City is shopping center development. Re hoped that the
City would look favorably on their request.
Mr. Dave Mulligan, 6620 Mesada Street, stated when he moved to his home this
area was basically a rural area. There was all kinds of wildlife and nature
around. They moved to an area which he hoped his children could grow up, have
animals and he able to live In a rural area. They are in opposition to the zone
change and asked that the Commission consider what the people living in the area
want.
Mr. Steven Beck, 6233 Cartilla, stated the fact that the developer does not live
in this (:try says a lot for the project. Those living in this area will have
to condone living with any development that may go in, but the developer will
leave the area once Lite development is completed,
Planning Commission Minutes -5- February 25, 1980
Mr. Sid Silliman, 6716 Haven Avenue, stated he is in 6pposition to the zone
change. He stated at the time the General Plan was adopted for this area,
a number of people did come to the Comnfssioo and object to the designation
Of commercial development. They also submitted a letter and petition to that
effect.
There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Hempel closed the
public hearing.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked how long the asterisk has been at that intersection.
Mr. Lam stated it has been there since July of 1978.
Commissioner Jones stated she disapproved of the commercial designation at the
time of the General Plan hearings. Also it is her opinion Haven Avenue should
be developed as a scenic. route. For that reason she has been opposed to the
asterisk shown on the General Plan throughout the whole process.
Commissioner Garcia stated his concern at the present time regarding this pro-
perty is that it is taking only a portion of the total 80 acres. It has been
our policy to request master planning of major parcels of land. The applicant
has a right to ask for the best investment of his property and at the same time
the residents around the area have a right to protect this project. In terms of a
zone change for this property at this time, he feels that it is not time.
Commissioner Dahl stated in his review of comments received from the audience,
he has to separate the emotional from the factual points brought out. In regard ^
to increased crime, in looking at the centers on 19th and Carnelian, we have
not been affected in that area with a major crime increase and have no reason
to believe we would be affected in this area. On the. other hand, there would be
a definite increase In traffic. There would be a possible increase in debris as
indicated, lie doesn't necessarily feel that property values would go down because
of commercial development in the area. A valid point is the possible over - building
of commercial development in the City, as there are a number of units that are
vacant now, On the emotional side is the liquor statements made. Students from
the college can get liquor any place if they want it, and we can not eliminate that.
From a factual standpoing is the drainage problem. Ile would agree with Commissioner
Garcia that we are not ready for a center at this location at this particular time;
however, he would not want to shut the door to that center being developed in the
future either. More evaluation of this particular proposal is needed.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated the asterisk was placed at this location as it was
felt by the Commission and the Council that this would be a good location for
a commercial center. He would agree with the other Comnissioners, however, that
this is not the time for this particular change of zone. This is not to say
that this Commission will never fenl a center would be appropriate for this area.
Chairman Hempel stated in regard to statements made that the City should keep
some of its land open, the City is working with the County to develop a wildlife
habitat restricted from vehicles, etc. He can not say that we are never going
to allmrya property owner to develop his land as the City would then get into
Planning Commission Minutes -6- February 25, 1980
Inverse condenwtion which means the City would be forced to buy that persons
land. lie stated it hag been discussed on many occasions that we need approxi-
mately 10,000 residents in an area for another shopping center, therefore, It
Is also his opinion that a center at this location is premature at this time.
In regard to drainage, If water starts coming down Haven without any facility
to accept that water, it would also have a serious impact bec,,use of the amount
of runoff. He feels it is totally premature to develop a center within the
next two or three years.
A motion was made by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy
to deny Zone Change No. 80 -02 without prejudice.
AYES: DAHL, TOLSTOY, JONES, GARCIA, RIDIPEL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
* * k * *
Recess called at 9:05 p.m.
Meeting reconvened at 9:30 p.m. with all Commissioners present.
PUBLIC HEARING
^ NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND SITE APPROVAL SO. 80-01 - NONE AND ASSOCIATES - Pro-
posed shopping center to be located on the southwest corner of Lemon and Haven.
Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Staff recommends
approval of Resolution No. 80 -07 subject to the following amendments; Condition #5:
A ratio of 202 of the trees to be planted an the site shall be specimen size trees
to be. 36" box trees. Amend Condition 07 to read: No additional food uses may be
permitted within the center unless: parking requirements of the toning ordinance
can be met and that such use is specifically reviewed and approved by the Planning
Division.
Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission of the staff.
Commissioner Dahl asked that staff review for the Comission the comments by
the Design Review Committee.
Michael Vairin reported the Design Review Committee reviewed the project and
requested redesign of the service station which has been complied with somewhat.
Mr. Rogan added that the application will improve Leman Avenue if the Commission
considers approval of the site approval. There is also a fueling of water in
this area during the rainy season. The applicant will be required to install
a major drainage structure to handle the water, so that it will not cause pro-
, blems for downstream properties.
Mr. Vairin stated one letter was received from the Carden Apartment Homeowners
Association, expressing obl,,ction to the proposed development. This letter has
been forwarded to each C�mmfssion membor for review and is on record In the
Planning Division. He reported In addition, numerous te:ephone communications
in opposition to the development have been received.
Planning Commission Minutes .7- Fehne,rtr 15, 1080
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meetin¢
1. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Communitv
Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, May 7, 1980. The
meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who led
in the pledge to the flag.
Present: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palumbo, Arthur
H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser.
Also present were: City Manager, Lauren Wasserman; Assistant City Attorney,
Robert Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development
Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs; Community Services Director,
Bill Holley.
Approval of Minutes:
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to approve the March 19 minutes.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palumbo to approve April 2 minutes. Motion
carried unanimously.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve the April 15 and April
16 minutes. Motion carried unanimously.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. Historical Commission meeting on May 13 at 7:00 p.m. in the Lion's Park
Community Center to discuss the Garrett Winery and Garcia House.
b. Bridge presented a Proclamation declaring June 8 -14 as Spring Clean -up Week
in Rancho Cucamonga. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve
the Proclamation. Motion carried 5 -0.
C. Mikels said he had attended the SCAG's Executive Committee last Thursday and
Friday, and today he had attended the SANBAG meeting. At the Executive Committee
they talked about the goals and directions of SCAG for the next year and re-
visions to the SCAG '78 growth figures. At SANBAG some revisions were submitted
to the Regional Statistical Averages.
d. Palumbo said he had attended the last Arrowhead Justice meeting on April 29
which was the last meeting for consideration of the budget review process. LEAA
was discontinuing funding of the Association. Therefore, the Association has asked
that the city provide continued funding for approximately the next three years in
support of the five programs and grants. He said the next meeting would be an
May 14 to see what the citfes'response would be. Palombo recommended that Council
consider withdrawing from the Association. Mikels said he had done some investi-
gation and found out that LEAA's funds were gone, and he did not see any benefit
for the city remaining in this organization.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to discontinue participation in the
Arrowhead Justice Association contingent upon LEAA funds being withdrawn, Motion
carried 5 -0.
e. Jim Frost said that at the SANBAG meeting it was discussed that the
County Planning Commission has approved a tentative map within the Route 30 right -
of -way and will be before the Board of Supervisors for review. He suggested that
the Mayor send letters to the Board of Supervisors reiterating our former position
that we are in opposition to any tentatives being pulled in unincorporated areas
within the Foothill Freeway corridor; and to the Countv Planning Department reitera-
ting our position. Also, that any decisions which affects other governmental
agencies the County Planning Department should get the authorization and approval
from those agencies,
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to direct the Mayor to send
letters to the Board of Supervisors and County Planning Department reiterating
our former position regarding the Foothill Freewav corridor. Motion carried
5 -0.
f. Frost announced that the City Selections Committee has determined that Bill
Kragness of Fontana will be replacing Mike Jiminez on LAFCO.
g. Mayor Schlosser read a letter from Vetro Strand Company which commended
one of the city's building inspectors for their helpfulness.
h. Mr. Wasserman requested the following changes to the Agenda:
(1) Remove staff items 6G, 6H, 61 to the Consent Calendar as items
4m, 4n, 4o.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to make the changes
from staff items to Consent Calendar items 4m, 4n. 4o. Motion carried
5 -0.
(2) Add staff item 6G, Vacation of a Portion of 19th Street. Motion: Moved
by Palombo, seconded by Frost to approve the addition of staff item 6G.
Motion carried 5 -0.
(3) Add staff item 6F, Request funding from the A.C. Jaycees. Motion: Moved
by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to table the request. Motion carried
5 -0.
Councilman Palombo was called from the meeting.
3. COMMISSION REPORTS.
A. Advisory Commission: Next meeting will be Thursday, May 15, at 6:00 p.m.
Place to be announced.
B. Historical Commission: There were no reports.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR.
a. Approval of warrants: Register No. 80 -5 -7 for $718,344.68.
b. Authorization for Community Services Director to attend Legislative Con-
ference and Federal Aid Briefing on May 14 and 15 in Sacramento. Cost:
not to exceed $200.
c. Refer late claim by Robert Glen Gregory in the amount of $75,000 to City
Attorney for handling.
d. Refer claim by Candy J. Cannon and Bill Cannon to the City Attorney for
handling.
e. Refer claim by Ed. Rogerson in the amount of $520.84 to the City
Attorney for handling.
f. Refer late claim by Jesse Albert Cruz to the City Attorney for handling.
g. Refer claim by Lesney Development to the City Attorney for handling.
h. Approval of alcoholic beverage license by Daniel B. Milliken, Margaret
F. Milliken co- trustees for estate of Ruth E. Milliken, for on -sale beer
lic_nse. at the La Mancha, 10495 Arrow Highway.
3
i. Release of bonds:
Tract 6846: Located at Lhe southeast corner of State Highway 30 and Beryl
Street. Owner: Griffin Development Co.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $100,000
Labor S Material Bond (road) 50,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) 20,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) 33,500
Tract 9224: Located at the northeast corner of Ramona Avenue and Victoria
Street. Owner: C/D Development Co.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $ 30,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) 15,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) 8,500
Tract 9226: Located north of Sixth Street between Archibald and Hellman
Avenues. Owner: Walton Associated Companies, dba
Faithful Performance Bond (road)
$100,000
Labor
6 Material
Bond
(road)
50,000
Labor
6 Material
Bond
(on -site sewer)
11,500
Labor
6 Material
Bond
(off -site sewer)
3,500
Labor
S Material
Bond
(water)
17,500
Tract 9245: Located on the west side of Haven Avenue between 19th Street
and the .euthern Pacific Railr..ad tracts. Owner: Lewis Homes of California.
Labor
6 Material Bond
(road)
$ 61,000
Labor
6 Material Bond
(sewer)
11,000
Labor
6 Material Bond
(on -site water)
14,000
Labor
6 Material Bond
(off -site water)
12,500
Tract 9254: Located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and
Highland Avenue. Owner: Walton /Lundstrom - Alta Loma.
Labor 6 Material Bond (road)
$ 69,000
Tract 9255: Located on the north side of 6th Street between Hellman Avenue
and Archibald Avenue. Owner: Lusk- Walton Cucamonga, a Partnership.
Labor 6 Material Bond (road)
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer)
Labor 6 Material Bond (water)
$ 50,000
17,000
15,500
Tract 9260: Located on the southwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald
Avenue. Owner: Thompson 6 Associates.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $150,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) 75,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) 12,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) 18,000
Tract 9274: Located on west side of Hellman Avenue and north of Arrow Route.
Owner: M. J. Brock and Sons.
Labor
6 Material
Bond
(road)
S 86,000
Labor
6 Material
Bond
(sewer)
24,000
Labor
6 Material
Bond
(on -site water)
27,000
Labor
6 Material
Bond
(off -site water)
6,000
Tract 9280: Located between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street at Monte
Vista Street. Owner: Bob Jensen Builder, Inc.
Labor d Material (road)
Labor 6 Material (sewer)
Labor 6 Material (water)
$ 72,000
19,000
27,500
Tract 9287: Located at northeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Carnelian
Street. Owner: Crowell /Leventhal. Inc.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $116,000
Labor S Material Bond (road) 58,000
Labor d Material Bond (sewer) 20,500
Labor S Material Bond (water) 20,000
Tract 9295: Located on southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th
Street. Owner: Socaland Corp.
Labor 6 Material Bond (road)
Labor S Material Bond (sewer)
Labor S Material Bond (water)
$ 50,000
11,500
16,000
Tract 9298: Located on south side of Vicars Drive between Sapphire
Street and Jasper Street. Owner: Manfred Hall.
Labor S Material Bond (water)
$ 14,500
Tract 9302: Located on southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Lemon
Avenue. Owner: Vanguard Builders, Inc.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $ 88,000
Labor 8 Material Bond (sewer) 17,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) 10,000
Tract 9313: Located on south side of 7th Street between Hellman Avenue
and Archibald Avenue. Owner: Socaland Corp.
Labor S Material Bond (road)
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer)
Labor d Material Bond (water)
$ 39,000
10.000
13,500
Tract 9314: Located on southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and 7th Street.
Owner: Lusk /Walton Cucamonga.
Labor 6 Material Bond (road)
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer)
Labor 6 Material Bond (water)
$ 84,000
6,000
20,500
Tract 9315: Located on northwest corner of Sixth Street and Archibald
Avenue, Owner: Lusk /Walton Cucamonga,
Labor 6 Material Bond (road)
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer)
Labor 6 Material Bond (water)
$ 40,000
8,000
10,000
Tract 9320: Located between Amethyst and Hellman Avenue and north of
Banyan Street and south of Hillside Road. Owner: Lewis Homes.
Labor S Material Bond (road) $ 37,000
Labor d Material Bond (water) 23,500
j. Refer claim by Green Andrew Hoxey in the amount of $500,000 to the City Attor-
ney for handling.
k. Approval of a Lease /Purchase Agreement for capital equipment at a cost of
$265,000.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LEASE
AGREEMENT WITH UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK FOR THE
PURCHASE OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT.
1. Refer claim by Ernest Derho in the amount of $10,000 to the City Attorney
for handling.
m. Tract Nos. 9193 and 9362 - Acceptance of Bonds. Located east of Vineyard
and north of Base Line. Owner: William Lyon Company.
Tract 9193:
Performance Bond (road) $ 69,000
Labor 6 Material (road) 69,600
Tract 9262:
Performance Bond (road) 136,800
Labor 6 Material (road) 136,800
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY,
AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9262.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY,
AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9193.
n. Acceptance of Parcel Map No. 5687: Located at the northeast corner of Base
Line and Rochester consisting of 2 parcels on 24 acres.
RESOLUTION N0, 80 -42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5687 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 5687).
age 6
n. Approval of Parcel Map No. 4511. Located southeast corner of Base Line
and Carnelian Street. Owner: Buster Filpi.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL
MAP NUMBER 4511, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 4511),
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Frost to approve the Consent Calendar
as amended by adding items 4m, 4n, and 40. Motion carried 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser called a Recess at 7:25 p.m. since Councilman Palombo had
not yet returned, and Council desired to have all members present to discuss
Committee assignments. The meeting reconvened at 7:35 p.m. with all Council
members present.
Item 2c. Council Committee Assignments. Council made the following Committee
assignments:
Finance Commictee: Jim Frost and Jon Mikels. (One would take
a one year term, the other a 6 month term to be determined amongst
themselves.)
Flood Control Zone I Committee: Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by
Bridge to appoint position of Mayor with alternate the position of
Mayor pro tem. Motion carried 5 -0.
City Selections Committee: Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels
to appoint the position of Mayor and alternate the position of Mayor
pro tem. Motion carried 5 -0.
Mayors and Presidents Committee: Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by
Palombo to appoint the Mayor and Mayor pro tem as alternate. Motion
carried 5 -0.
City Flood Control Committee: Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by
Mikels to appoint Bridge, alternate Palombo. Motion carried 5 -0.
BEST Committee: Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to appoint
Bridge, alternate Palombo. Motion carried 5 -0.
Citrus Belt Executive Committee: Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by
Palombo to appoint Frost or his designee. Motion carried � -0.
Arrowhead Justice Association: Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Frost
to appoint Palombo pending funding. Motion carried 5 -0.
Inland Manpower Association: Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Frost
to appoint Palombo. Motion carried 5 -0.
SCAG: Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to appoint Mikels, alter-
nate Palombo. Motion carried 5 -0.
Soil Erosion and Dust Prevention: Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by
Palombo to appoint Mikela or his designee. Motion carried 5 -0.
Foothill Freeway: Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Frost to appoint
Schlosser, alternate Bridge. Motion carried 5 -0.
r
West Valley Transit: Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to
appoint Palombo. Motion carried 5 -0.
Council requested that secret ballots be used for the selection of the repre-
sentative for SANBAG /Omnitrans. The City Clerk conducted the process, and then
announced that Councilman Mikels had been selected to be the Council's repre-
sentative for SANBAG /Omni trans. Mikels suggested that Jim Frost be appointed
as the alternate. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to appoint
Jim Frost as the alternate for SANBAG /Omnitrans. Motion carried 5 -0.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5A. APPEAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -02 - WATT INDUSTRIES. A change of zone from
R -3 to C -2 for property located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon
and Highland. Staff report by Jack Lam.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 101.
ORDINANCE NO. 101 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING THE
WESTERLY 557' OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201-
271-53 FROM R -3 TO C -1 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE
OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN LEMON AND HIGHLAND
AVENUES.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to waive further reading. Motion
carried 5 -0.
Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. Those speaking in favor of the
zone change and proposed shopping center were:
President of Watt Commercial Properties
Lloyd Bookout, environmental consultant
Jerry Kramer
Jack Sylvester, owner of the property
Vito de Vito Francesco, attorney for Mr. Sylvester
Bob Demlock, consulting civil engineer
Doug Hone, owner of parcel on the southwest corner of
Lemon and Haven
Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 9:15 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:25 p.m.
with all members of the Council present.
Mayor continued the public hearing by asking for those who wished to
speak in opposition to the zone change and project. They were:
Linda Greer, 6204 Valinda Street
Craig Nelson, 10560 Lemon
Clara Velos, 10522 Lemon
Roland Smith, 6235 Valinda
Ronnie Tannebaum, 6681 Etiwanda Avenue
Since there was no one else wishing to address the Council, the Mayor closed
the public hearing,
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to refer this back to the
Planning Commission for reconsideration with the consent of the
developer. Motion failed by the following vote: AYES: Palombo, Mikels,
NOES: Frost, Bridge, and Schlosser. ABSENT: None.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Frost that the appeal be granted
and the proposal for the zone change from R -3 to C -1 be approved. Motion
carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES:
Mikels, Palombo. NOES: None.
Mayor set May 21 for second reading of ordinance.
8
Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 10:20 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 10:25 P.M.
with all members of the Council present.
5B. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -03 - THOMAS COLEMAN. A request for a change of zone
from R -3 to M -1 for 2.4 acres of land located on the north side of Ninth
Street, approximately 1,000 feet west of Vineyard Avenue - Assessor's
Parcel No. 207 - 262 -28. Staff report by Jack Lam.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 102.
ORDINANCE NO. 102 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 207 - 262 -28 FROM R -3 TO M -1 LOCATED
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NINTH STREET APPROXIMATELY
1,000 FEET WEST OF VINEYARD AVENUE.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Bridge to waive further reading of
Ordinance No. 102. Motion carried 5 -0.
Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
hearing was closed. After a brief Council discussion, the Mayor set May 21
for second reading of Ordinance No. 102.
5C. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -05 - JUDITH AND THOMAS STEPHENSON. A change of zone
from R -1 -1 to R -1- 20,000 for property located on the northwest corner of
Klusman and Whirlaway. Staff report by Jack Lam.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 103.
ORDINANCE NO. 103 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 1061 - 511 -6 AND 7 FROM R -1 -1 TO R -1- 20,000
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KLUSMAN AND
WHIRLAWAY.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading of
Ordinance No. 103. Motion carried 5 -0.
Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
hearing was closed. There being no discussion from the Council, the Mayor
set May 21 for second reading of Ordinance No. 103.
5D. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS. An
ordinance setting up procedures and policy for disasters and emergencies
within the City. Staff report by Bill Holley.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 104.
ORDINANCE N0. 104 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO
EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS.
!lotion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Frost to waive entire reading. Motion
carried 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the hearing was closed.
Council discussed the ordinance and made the following changes:
Mikels recommended that the words "officer or" be deleted on page 4 of
the ordinance. Council concurred with this change.
Palombo suggested that the Disaster Council consist also of a councilmember
who should be the Vice Chairman. Council concurred with this change.
After the Council discussion, Mayor Schlosser set May 21 for second reading of
Ordinance No. 104.
5E. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HISTORICAL ORDINANCE NO. 70. The ordinance clarifies
whether or not the City Council is required to hear all landmark matters heard
by the Historic Commission, whether recommended for approval or not. Staff re-
port by Bill Holley.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 70 -D.
ORDINANCE NO. 70 -D (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTIONS
(c) AND (d) OF SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE NO. 70
CREATING AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO ACT
IN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE
IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL
OBJECTS, EVENTS, STRUCTURES, AND SITES, AND TO
IDENTIFY PERSONS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE TO
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of Ordinance
No. 70 -D. Motion carried 5 -0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the hearing was closed. There being no further discussion from Council, the
Mayor set May 21 for second reading of Ordinance No. 70 -D.
5F. RESOLUTION ADOPTING POLICY FOR STREET DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR LAND
LOCKED PARCELS. Staff report by Jack Lam.
On February 6 the City Council had reviewed a resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission regarding street development standards for land locked parcels.
The Resolution was inadvertently left off the agenda. Approval of the Resolution
is necessary so staff can continue with the preparation of an ordinance.
Mayor asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak. There being no response,
the public portion was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to adopt Resolution No. 80 -38 and
to waive further reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. City Clerk
Wasserman read title of Resolution No.80 -38.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
REQUIREMENT FOR ACCESS TO LANDLOCKED PARCELS
WHERE NO SUBDIVISION OCCURS.
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
6A. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS - EDWARD HOOVER
The Hoovers are the owners of a "land locked parcel" and have requested that
the city allow them to split the lot into two lots without the requirement
of street improvements.
6B. PARCEL MAP 5441: A REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION TO STREET IMPROVEMENT BE-
QUIREMENTS. —
Mr. Hubbs gave the staff reports for items 6A and 6B at the same time.
Mayor opened the meeting for public input on both items. Those speaking
in favor of the waiver of street improvements were:
William J. Schultz, 802 W. San Bernardino Road, Covina (Parcel Map 5441),
Bob Horne, engineer hired by Mr. Schultz from Linville, Sanderson, Horne
No one was present representing the Hoovers.
Council asked Mr. Schultz if they could study this further and come back at a
later Council meeting for a decision. Mr. Schultz concurred with this.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels for a continuance of items 6A
and 6B. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo,
Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None.
6C. LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID URBAN SYSTEM PROJECTS AGREEMENT FOR RECONSTRUCTION
OF BASE LINE BETWEEN VINEYARD AND HEM40SA AVENUE. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 80-39 and
to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. Title of Resolution was
read by City Clerk Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO, 80 -39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO,
08 -5420, SUPPLEMENT NO, 2.
6D. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR THE BASE LINE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT BETWEEN
VINEYARD AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE, Staff report by Lloyd Hubba,
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to award the contract for the
Base Line reconstruction project to Robert Escudero, Inc. and authorize
execution of the contract and funding of the project plus 10% contingency
and $6,000 for construction staking. Motion carried by the following vote;
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None.
6E. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to authorize the signing of a
lease for 9340 -D Base Line at a cost of 35 cents per square foot to be used
for additional office space far the city offices. Also, to authorize the
expenditure of $13,500 for modifications to the new unit and the main building.
Motion carried 5 -0.
6F. ACQUISITION OF MAINTENANCE FACILITY. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve the purchase of the
County Road Maintenance yard at 111 North Grove Avenue and to authorize taking
$137,000 from the facilities fund for this acquisition to include the installation
of gas storage and pumping equipment. Motion carried 5 -0.
6G. _ADDED ITEM: VACATION OF A PORTION OF 19TH STREET. Staff report by Lloyd
Hubbs.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve the Resolution of Intent
No. 80 -44 and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. Title read by
City Clerk Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -44
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO VACATE 19TH STREET AT RAMONA
AVENUE AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. V -007 ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
Mr. Dougherty gave a report regarding the Owens versus Independence case.
He stated that it was decided by the Supreme Court that municipalities
were always declared under the Civil Rights Act not be be "persons ", and
therefore, although people could sue public officials, they could not sue
the municipality.
In 1978 the Supreme Court changed that rule by saying that cities are
persons and could be sued under the Civil Rights Act. However, up until
that time, the defense of good faith was always available for city officials.
In Owens versus Independence case, the Supreme Court eliminated the defense of
good faith for the public entity. It is still available for the public
official, but is not available for the public agency. In Civil Rights law
suits against a public agency, there is an absolute liability if the vio-
lation of civil rights is established notwithstanding good faith.
8. ADJOURNMENT.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adjourn to an Executive
Sesstion not to reconvene. The meeting adjourned at 12:10 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
I/iJC�
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk