The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981/06/17 - Agenda PacketAll items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The dead- line for submitting these items is S;oo p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. Flag Salute. 8, Roll Call: Frost _•, Mikels r , Palumbo ? Bridge( , and Schlosser V. C. Approval of Minutes: • 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. A. Thursday, June 18, 7 :00 p.m. - Advisory Commission - City Hall Conference Room, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C. B, Monday, June 22, 7:00 p.m, - Public Hearing for 1981 -82 Budget, Lions Ctr. 9161 Baseline. C. Presentation of City Plaques to Chester Frost, Jorge Garcia, and Laura Jones for service to the community. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to he routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. L� / A. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -6 -17 in the amount of $291,062.99, B. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for on -sale general 1 to Warner Consulting Services, Ltd., Aldo fl. Warner, President, A,W.'s Cowgirl, 11871 Foothill Blvd, J C, Claim against the City by Gerry Johns. The company handling 3 the claim, Suter Claims Service, has requested that Council take immediate action of denial on this claim. CITY OF G/ ' n RANUW CUG>,NIOi1GA CITY COUIUIL �; g ��> AGE, 1977 June 17, 1981 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The dead- line for submitting these items is S;oo p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. Flag Salute. 8, Roll Call: Frost _•, Mikels r , Palumbo ? Bridge( , and Schlosser V. C. Approval of Minutes: • 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. A. Thursday, June 18, 7 :00 p.m. - Advisory Commission - City Hall Conference Room, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C. B, Monday, June 22, 7:00 p.m, - Public Hearing for 1981 -82 Budget, Lions Ctr. 9161 Baseline. C. Presentation of City Plaques to Chester Frost, Jorge Garcia, and Laura Jones for service to the community. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to he routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. L� / A. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -6 -17 in the amount of $291,062.99, B. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for on -sale general 1 to Warner Consulting Services, Ltd., Aldo fl. Warner, President, A,W.'s Cowgirl, 11871 Foothill Blvd, J C, Claim against the City by Gerry Johns. The company handling 3 the claim, Suter Claims Service, has requested that Council take immediate action of denial on this claim. L] City Council Agenda -2- June 17, 1981 D. Award of Annual City -wide Landscape and Irrigation Contract 7 It is recommended that Council award the city -wide lands- cape and irrigation contract to Southern California Lands- cape Maintenance for $57,171.44 for the fiscal year 1981 -82. 9 E. Award of City -wide Street Tree Service Contract. It is _ recommended that Council award the Street Tree Service Contract to Homer's Tree Surgery for $1,988 for the fiscal year 1981 -82. 17 F. Reimbursement and Reacceleration Agreements for Assessment District 19 -1. Approval recommended with Koll Company for acquisition of improvements at time of District forma- tion where accelerated construction has been completed. 34 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF j2ANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND REACCELERATION OF STREET • AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUCTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 79 -1. G. Acceptance of Parcel Map 4837, Bonds and Agreements. 35 Located at 6931 Amethyst Street. Subdivider: Edward Kohler. Faithful Performance $10,000 Labor & Material 5,000 36 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4837, IMPROVE- MENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. 41 H. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreements for Parcel Map 6206 by Daon /Barton for median island on Haven Avenue between Arrow Route and Foothill Blvd. Faithful Performance $43,000 Labor & Material 21,500 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -89 48 Is A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVE- MENT SECURITY FOR MEDIAN ISLAND CONSTRUCTION ON HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND FOOTHILL BLVD. C-1 City Council Agenda -3- June 17, 1981 I. Acceptance of Tract 10491, Bonds and Agreement. Located 49 southwest corner of Victoria and Ramona Streets. Faithful Performance $160,000 Labor & Material 80,000 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -90 60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVE- MENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 10491. 61 J. Acceptance of Tract 11428, Bonds and Agreement. Located north of Foothill Blvd. between Haven and Center Avenues. Faithful Performance $ 70,000 Labor & Material 35,000 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -91 63 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVE- MENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 11428. K. Release of Bonds: 64 Tract 8884: located on the east and south sides of Red Hill Country Club Drive. Owner: Harnish - Morgan - Causey. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $134,000 Authorize City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion for Tract 8884. L. Set public hearing date of July 1, 1981 for Environmental Assessment for Planned Development No. 80 -03 (TT11610) - A change of zone from A -1 (limited agriculture) to R -2 -PD (multiple family - planned development) for the develop- ment of 28 condominiums on 4.55 acres of land located on the west side of Turner Avenue between Church Street and Base Line. E City Council Agenda -4- June 17, 1981 • M. Set public hearing date of July 1, 1981 for Environmental Assessment for Planned Development No. 80 -13 (TT11797) - _ A change of zone from R -3 (multiple family) to R -3 -PD (multiple family - planned development) for the development of 240 condominium units on 11.5 acres of land in the R -3 zone located on the west side of Archibald, north of Base Line Road - APN 202 - 181 -12, 21 (portion) 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. MEET- AND - CONFER PROCEDURES /MOBILE HOME PARKS.YI !� Report by Jim Robinson. ORDINANCE NO. 148 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.10 TO TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A MOBILEHOME PARK RENT MEDIA- TION PROCESS. B. EN'9RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT • 81 -02. An amendment to the Growth Management Plan, amend- ing the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 17.04, Section 71.04.080, to eliminate the tri- annual review period and allow projects to be filed on an open basis. ORDINANCE NO. 147 (second reading) 67 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 17.04, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SECTION 17.04.080, TO ELIMINATE THE TRI- ANNUAL REVIEW PERIODS. C. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 81 -01 - TRAILS ELEMENT. A re- 69 vision to the adopted Trails Element of the General Plan of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -92 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED TRAILS ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -93 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN OF REGIONAL MULTI- PURPOSE, COMMUNITY, AND LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. City Council Agenda -5- June 17, 1981 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -01 88 ACACIA. A change of zone from - (multiple family resi- dential) to R -3 -PD (multiple family /planned development) for the development of a planned condominium complex con- sisting of 84 dwelling units on 9.6 acres of land located approximately on the southwest corner of Baker Avenue and Foothill Blvd. APN 207 - 191 -31 and 40. ORDINANCE NO. 149 (first reading) 121 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 207- 191 -31 AND 40 FROM R -3 TO R- 3 -P.D. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 84 CONDOMINIUMS ON 9.6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BAKER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. E. CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE BETWEEN 122 7TH STREET AND 8TH STREET, A request by the Caldwell Company. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -94 126 j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED A PORTION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH STREETS. F. ESTABLISHMENT OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR LANDSCAPE MAIN- 128 TENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1. Recommend approval of assess- ment for landscape maintenance at $60.26 per lot for 1981 -62 fiscal year. This amount being a reduction from the $95.18 rate for 1980 -81. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -95 158 4, i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENT WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1981 -82 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. 11 0 • E City Council Agenda 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. -6- A. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FUNDING FOR DEER CREEK. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE DEER CREEK FINANCING PRO- GRAM OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR CONSULTANT FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. Oral report by Lauren Wasserman. June 17, 1981 C. STAFF. RECOMMENDATION FOR LEGAL COUNSEL FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGINUY. Oral report by Lauren Wasserman. D. CONTRACTURAL SERVICES FOR GILBERT AJA AND ASSOCIATES. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. E. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN - SCOPE OF WORK. The items to be included in the study will a presented to the City Council for their consideration and approval so that staff can proceed with the Etiwanda Specific Plan Staff report by Jack Lam. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 7. ADJOURNMENT. Meeting to adjourn to Monday, June 22, 7:00 p.m. for a Budget Meeting. 160 173 175 196 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, on Wednesday, June 17, 1981. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who led in the flag salute. Present: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Arthur H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Deputy City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Barry Hogan; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; and Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Approval of Minutes: None were submitted for approval. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Mayor Schlosser presented city plaques for service to the city to the following: Laura Jones, former Planning Commissioner Jorge Garcia, former Planning Commissioner There were also plaques to present to Chester Frost, who had served on the Historical Commission, and to Mrs. Leonard Gorczyca, chose husband had served as Chairman of the Historical Commission. Council agreed to present these at another time when both Mr. Frost and Mrs. Gorczyca could be present. b. Mayor Schlosser read a Proclamation which proclaimed August 1 -8 as Hawaii Days in Rancho Cucamonga. This was a promotional effort sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce. c. Mayor Schlosser introduced Assistant Sheriff Floyd Tidwell who made a presentation to two teen age boys commending them for their help in aiding the sheriff in apprehending several robbers. The boys were Justin yeary age 13 and Robert Bowen, age 15. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. The following Consent Calendar was presented for approval: a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81 -6 -17 in the amount of $291,062.99. b. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for on -sale general to Warner Consulting Services, Ltd., Aldo N. Warner, President, A.W.'s Cowgirl, 11871 Foothill Blvd. c. Claim against the City by Gerry Johns. The company handling the claim, Suter Claims Service, has requested that Council take immediate action of denial on this claim. d. Award of Annual City -wide Landscape and Irrigation Contract. It is recommended that Council award the city -wide landscape and irrigation contract to Southern California Landscape Maintenance for $57,171.44 for the fiscal year 1981 -82. e. Award of City -wide Street Tree Service Contract. It is recommended that Council award the Street Tree Service Cotnract to Homer's Tree Surgery for $1,988 for the fiscal year 1981 -82. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND REACCELFRATION OF STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVE- MENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 79 -1. g. Acceptance of Parcel Map 4837, Bonds and Agreements. Located at 6931 Amethyst Street. Subdivider: Edward Kohler. Faithful Performance $10,000 Labor S Material 5,000 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4837, IMPROVEMENT AGREE- MENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. h. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreements for Parcel Map 6206 by Daon /Barton for median island on Raven Avenue between Arrow Route and Foothill Blvd. Faithful Performance $43,000 Labor 6 Material 21,500 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING n!PROVEM iNNI AGREVIMNT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MEDIAN ISLAND CONSTSJCTION ON HAVER AVENUE, BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND FOOTHILL BLVD. i. Acceptance of Tract 10491, Bonds and Agreement. Located southwest corner of Victoria and Ramona Streets. Faithful Performance $160,000 Labor 6 Material 80,000 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ..dCAMCINGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING nQROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AM FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 10401. J. Acceptance of Tract 11428, Bonds and Agreement. Located north of Foothill between Haven and Center Avenues. Faithful Performance $ 70,000 Labor 6 Material 35,000 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CLAIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 11428. $134, Authorize City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion for Tract 8884. 1. Set public hearing date of July 1, 1981 for Environmental Assessment for Planned Development No. 80 -03 (TT11610) - A change of zone from A -1 (limited agriculture) to R -2 -PD (multiple family - planned development) for the development of 28 condominiums on 4.55 acres of land located on the west side of Turner Avenue between Church Street and Base Line. m. Set public hearing date of July 1, 1981 for Environmental Assessment for Planned Development 80 -13 (TT11797) - A change of zone from R -3 (multiple family) to R -3-PD (multiple family - planned development) for the development of 240 condominium units on 11.5 acres of land in the R -3 zone located on the west side of Archibald, north of Base Line Road - APN 202 - 181 -12,21 (portion). Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 4A. MEET AND CONFER PROCEDURES /MOBILE HOME PARFS. Jim Robinson presented the staff report. Councilman Mikels stated that the proposed ordinance 1. Guarantees that the park owners and tenants committee can sit down and discuss any rate increase When a meet and confer session has been called by a petition, the notice will be sent out to the owner and tenants committee and no rate increase can go into affect until the meet and confer session is held. If the owner does not show, then the rate increase cannot be effective. 2. Provides for a mediation irocess. Bridge and Mikels concurred to instruct staff that fees established by Council should be divided evenly between the two parties and should be in the Resolution. Council requested that the City Clerk read the entire Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 148 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.10 TO TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A MOBILEHOME PARR RENT MEDIA- TION PROCESS. Councilman Palombo stated that the only way to ensure control of the rents was by building more mobilehome parks in the area. Mr. Bill Rudenbush, President of the Alta Loma Riding Club, who spoke in favor of the proposed trails element. There being no further response, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolution No. 81 -92 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -92. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED TRAILS ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN. Motiun: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 81 -93 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -93. RESOLUTIONi NO. 81 -93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN OF REGIONAL MULTI- PURPOSE, COMMUNITY, AND LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 4D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -01 - ACACIA. A change of zone from R -3 (multiple family residential) to R -3 -PD (multiple family /planned development) for the development of a planned condominium complex consisting of 84 dwelling units on 9.6 acres of land located approximately on the southwest corner of Baker Avenue and Foothill Blvd. APN 207 - 191 -31 and 40. Staff report by Barry Hogan. City Clerk Wasserman read title of the ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 149 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 207- 191 -31 AND 40 FROM R -3 TO R -3 -PD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 84 CONDOMINIUMS OF 9.6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BAKER. AVENUE AND FOOT- HILL BLVD. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINING: Mikels. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Phillip A. Gustafson, civil engineer, representing ACACIA. He stated for the record that they intended to construct a masonary wall around the house which is presently there and surrounded by the project. There being no further public response, the Mayor closed the oublic hearing. There being no Council discussion, Mayor Schlosser set July 1 for second reading of Ordinance No. 149. Charles Caldwell, the applicant. Howard F. Thompson, architect for the Caldwell Company Jerry Oldenburg Vito de Vito Francesco, representing the property owner on the east side of Cleveland Avenue. He pointed out that at no time did Mr. Sylvester give a right for dedication. However, if there were, then they requested the vacation. The City Attorney said that in the matter of whether Cleveland is a dedicated street or not was only brought to his attention today and he did not have adequate time to investigate records. If the City Council decides tonight to vacate the street, then it does not matter whether it is a dedicated street. However, if the Council decides not to vacate, then he suggested that the City Council continue the hearing for about four weeks to give him time to look into this. Mayor Schlosser asked if we needed the street or not? He felt that was the main question. Jeff Sceranka asked questions regarding the alignment of Cleveland. Mr. Hubbs answered by stating he has questions regarding the alignment. How- ever, he felt the question regarding the vacation was premature since there were enough uncertainities. He stated staff is not saying there would be a street there, just that it is premature now to consider this. Michael Turrilo, attorney for the applicant. Jack Sylvester. He said he had talked with Mr. Caldwell. They are both willing to let Council look into this to see if this is really a dedicated street. There being no further public response, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Councilman Mikels said he agreed and felt the City Council should look into this. Councilman Bridge felt the city should have put the property criteria on the applicant earlier in the process. He felt it was impossible to do anything else now and would recommend vacating the street. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Frost to approve the vacation of Cleveland and approve Resolution No. 81 -94 and to waive the entire reading. Councilman Mikels wanted the Resolution reconsidered because he wanted firm information and if no one would be prejudice in any , then he would like to have a look at this. Hawanted that information before he votea. Councilman Frost said he has spent several hours with several engineers looking at the circulation patterns, and felt the motion was appropriate. Councilman Palombo said he wanted also to have time to look into this and concurred with Councilman Mikels. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to table the original motion. Motion failed by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo. NOES: Frost, Bridge, Schlosser. Motion to approve the vacation was approved by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Bridge, Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINING: Mikels, Palombo. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -94. 4F. ESTABLISHMENT OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. Staff report was presented by Lauren Wasserman. It was recommended that Council approve the assessment for landscape maintenance at $60.26 per lot for the 1981 -82 fiscal year. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to approve Resolution No. 81 -95 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -95. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENT WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTEN- ANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1981 -82 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. 5A. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FUNDING FOR DEER CREEK. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public input. There being none, he closed the meeting to public comments. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve. Resolution No. 81 -96 and to waive the entire reading. Councilman Frost suggested several changes to the Resolution. However, after some discussion, the Council concurred that the changes were immaterial and left the Resolution as originally stated. Motion to approve Resolution No. 81 -96 was approved unanimously 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 81 -96. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE DEER CREEK FINANCING PROGRAM OF THE BOARD OS SUPERVISORS FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. Councilmen Mikels and Palumbo, Planning Commissioner Jeff Sceranka, Community Development Director Jack Lam, and City Manager Lauren Wasserman. He stated that they had interviewed five firms. He then turned the meeting over to Councilman Palumbo to present the candidate which the committee selected. Mr. Palumbo stated that the committee concurred and recommended the company of Willdan and Associates. Councilman Hikels said that all five candidates were excellent. They were able to narrow the selection down to two candidates. He said the strengths of the Willdan proposal and the presentation which they made gave them a slight edge. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to present and award the contract for consultant of the Redevelopment Agency to Willdan and Associates, and to direct staff to negotiate a contract for services. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 5C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR LEGAL COUNSEL FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. Mr. Wasserman presented an oral recommendation. Mr. Wasserman recommended that Council use the same process in selecting the legal counsel for the redevelopment agency. He said they could appoint a new selections committee or keep the one they presently had. Council concurred in keeping Councilmen Mikels and Palombo as the subcommdttee to also interview law firms. 5D. CONTRACTURAL SERVICES FOR GILBERT AJA AND ASSOCIATES. Mr. Wasserman presented an oral report. Councilman Bridge asked if this were to include Phase IT and III. He said it was not clear in the report. Mr. Wasserman said this was only for Phase I. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve a contract with Gilbert Aia and Associates to handle the Phase I work in connection with the planning and site design of the civic center at a coat not to exceed $9500 to be billed on an hourly basis. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 5E. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN - SCOPE OF WORK. Mr. Otto Kroutil presented the Work Program. After the presentation of the Work Program, Mr. Kroutil said the next order of business was to appoint a Committee. Councilman Bridge said that they should decide tonight the size of the committee, but as far as the individual members, he would like to make those appointments later. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to make this a nine member committee to work on the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to name Councilman Frost as Council representative z.nd chairman of the Committee and to name Planning Commissioner Tolstoy as the Planning Commission representative. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to appoint the remaining members of the Committee at the July 1 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. June 22, 1981, at 7:00 p.m, in the Lions Park Community Center. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 10:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk l{' ::Iv��1'- -. ✓- L.,IN:':.1. lS .L'. .Cr C-1 rPUI COPY.. APRKATION FOR ALCOHOLIC RVFMGT LICHIiINS) to pponmmt of All.h.ly bp.e' Canbd .. 12150 Sumt ._. Sm,m-nro. <vli1, 953U 5En 9ernardino - �- io.oud goal WoPPlmM Acnn. d-vnbMmlolb..: -'_.� 1. NPHS) OF LICENSES) FILE NO. -- OF SALE =. -asAl L PUBLIC PRLb`SSLS . ��- -- A,li v:d.r Sep. 24" � `❑ Efl «room.: sua ce FEE No GEOGRAPHICAL _CODE OvN Orved 2. N"E(S) OF APPLICANTS) i"P, Pmml _ -_ En «r.. DO,e _ . •' R'AFi CONSULMM BRRYIGES -LTL - - '.Pres.'7. -Proms: P,ldo 1l. V:amer ]. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE LK. TYPE Sec: Robert L. PS kin - - SCIiAeGE TO T ^PL 48 133.11 1' 1. Nam. of Rr.i -A'.'s Co." ..,. ,._ . S Lmovan of @tvu,. -NU ber ovd Sues - _11071 - FootTill Blvd. .......... - ..... _... _ ....._... Ciry and Zip CNe Covnry ,h. ,-cammn 117 G SAN M;; RECEIPT No $l:Sv TOTAL f q. Moiling Add.... (if dill.,-, from SINo ber and Sven _ _ ' w 1 1 .o Per 9. IT-. you em been <on.ip of v I.bey9 10. No.- you e,v welm -d vary of tbo pro.idmr of lh. Alrohelk "' ` ^•• hrerege Cm.rd A<' « pyla,ie, of 1M p,tm D.enl pM •ns =', rr. ^r - _ ,omin91. IS. AOr 11. E.plam v 9E5" Dodo, a Ibm<9 v, 10 on an u,tcuh en, S,6 h.11 be deemed pep of IN, eppli� afian. 13A1 Se.cr. ^onto..,A. .. ^le ' "erl jvsna :. ",ms`s. .en J Pcro_D„overnor's Cardin 1Z. ApoLmm ...... H) Seel orn m ...... ..ployed in on eel. b<emed p<mnn idl IS... off rh. v..lirmllm, of o bunFee..: 12. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Covnry of .5an Bernardino _. Don 5 -3 -31 .... ........._ w�. r.r,..•r <, wK.•.n .x nY r+�-Mr-.:rr4M.r ^MMr'. M ,�. -fir^ Wxr A r r n:ua +i :xG•' . n/ . :Gn.x+ On NN :rr nSn . UL Tn-:.. n :rG m5.r .6r.. R: VI C ES .Ln - .] 1 .r. ! r . 11. APPLICANT .. -6 ' �M w-'[ew 0 w M4N SIGN HfRf 9Y: "...' ..... -. ' -•. -_: APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR _ IS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Covnry of Ban Bernardino. ... o.r. .. :N.n w..: oA w.�r.'._u :. ww.:... ..r � ....rw ., ..,,:.- w' •N..n w irnrr. -: n nr.:..�:+ :ri. e.<.rww: IA Li....NUmFrvl.1 - 'F' =NER C0 ::UVfIti:O SMICL_ I:D by: (XO w �� -•-��i '. ^ -0 ?n7Ci1 CITY IEF RANr'EO 19, 1 ... 1- Numoel and slo., cry and np cod. Ae;nlry Gamryj"N Op Rol WHIP IPWI Thi. Line: re,Orpnpmrnt Cre 00q Ido 111 :,NtF.d: ❑ Recorded noev. Z181910131p11121314fj 6 ❑ iidrtipry pppen. �. 1 ❑ _ ... _... _._. _.. .._... _.._ ...... -. <OIIES MAILED .._...___.._......._... :o..n 00...r..I FN of .. ........ bids .... ...�___...- _ORw.m He ._., _......_.__... OP. .'a IOF CALIFORNIA •ARTMENT OF _COHOUC BEVERAGE Gn NTnnl PERSONAL AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION No,_ 52649 1/' /77 I. FULL n+ME ] p .,PNRR........ Ma.NeE N•mlr..l[.J .i. s SEC. I 3 It Alden (birth name) 560 -26 -0191 <' E ISl3 a n 11871 F--. hill IWNERE LICEVSE T BE ISSUEVI Blvd., Rancho Cucamonf•a (IP7) 91730 1E.,N 2 ? -•T9t0 S. N E ADDRESS 1 1871 Foothill IITI EETI ICITVI Blvd, Rancho Cucamonga (I11) 91730 I:I PI pv ONE 37 -1910 a. AG E: 55 SExI „I NT:� 5 —� WT: 1'J2 RAIN: brn EVE5: brn sE TCVSINE33 PRONE 8987 -1910 1. AM OR WILL Bc ❑DONE, 0 PRTNER 1+7vFe,EEn EjoiR.CTOR❑NO ON �M R auRANT OF ,ERs ONS 01 COMPANY L .a R' 0L ES3 EE Pres. /Vice -Pres. in Warner Consulting Servi e. --r 3 LIEL 9. DO V.0 ... ..YE ANY pu ECT, OR INDIRECT INTEREST IN ANY OTHER ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE BUSINESB 1 OR AVE v v N ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSEE OR AN oFFm ER OR DIRECTOR OF A CORPORATE LICENSEE+ ❑ No []L V. Of Yea EEapl m Fully) Type 47 licensed at 11871 Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucanonga, since 5/23/77 to present as Pres/Vice -Pres in WARNER CONSULTING SERVICES LTD. Off Sale General in connection with gambling_casino in Henderson, Nevada, HER. o IR EC TOR O LOEq O CORPORATE A Ev En n COnO LIC BEVERAGE LICENSE roENIEO, SVSeENOEO, REVOHEO. OR AN OFFER IN COMPgOM13E ACCEATE0 ORNaeJECTEO' El: o D❑ V e, !II Yea, FaRl.m Fvllrl • II. CuRRF':- -11 1, PAST ENOLOV VENT [FOR AT LEAST PAST FIVE VEAR51 lose eJJ•No -1 ah,BrS 1 rnacesso Nu FROM To TYPE OF WORK FIRM NAME CITY MO. YR. MO. YP, J a 5 -23 -77 present Owner Varner Consulting services Rancho Cuca- un I:, w 3 He— O LL Y O NoaQ GY,, Eivor eave you ou'. anywhere or at any lime, (p forfeited bail, (2) been convicted, (3) fined, or (A) placid on probation for any violation of the la wG (If :any of these events has occurred, this question must be answered "Yen- rega rd l ess of sub seq a ent court action resulting in expungement, unless an order sealing records under Section 1203.45 of the Penal Code, relating to persons under age 13 yPars, has been issued. If no order has been issued, the answer must be "Yes ".) r] No Yes Of yes, explain each event fully.) NoilF L REl+v6- .1/c. 3y .V0,c1£ I have read all of the above and darters under PLACE _ San • • Suter Claims Service 1530 North Gower Street Los Angeles, Coliforniu 90028 121 31 467-1010 June 4, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga Past Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Bev Authelet Awe and C,nwal unbinly Fin. and Inland Marin. Ill -.and onnndan, fidenly and Sa" had.d. ti.binly Ulf m,w.d. u.en.. N.. 6381 Our file: SCS 19579 Re: Assured Rancho Cucamonga P. D. Policy No. L 97952 Claimant terry Johns D /Incident 2-21 -81 Dear Miss Authelet: We would suggest that you issue a letter of denial on this claim without further delay, if you have not already done so. Would you please also send us a copy of the letter of denial. RED: tcb Very truly yours, SOTGR CLAIMS SERVICE q -g Robert E. Brown n 3 Gerry Johns, In Pro Per c/o 630 East Rialto San Bernardino, California (714) 383 -1265 Claimant, Johns R+2arr1117 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTRATION MAY c-7 1981_ AM 718191101ll11 IIA31415 6 CLAIN FOR PERSONAL INJURIES GERRY JOHNS, ) Claimant, ) om« VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, COUNTY ) OF SAII BERNARDINO, OFFICER TON ) SEELIG, and DOES 1 through 100, ) �' inclusive, ) Defendants. ) Gov_er_nme nt Code, SS 905; 710; 910.2, et seq. ------------------------------------ TO SIZE SECRETARY OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, THE CLERK OF THE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BEP.NARDIHO, AND OFFICER TON SEELIG: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Gerry Johns, whose address is 630 East Rialto San Bernardino, California claims damages from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Sheriff of the County of Sari Bornardino, and Officer Tom Seelig in an amount computed as of the date of presentation of this Claim, of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00). / /_I 1 This Claim is based on personal injuries sustained by 2 claimant on or about February 21, 1981, on Archibald Avenue, • 3 Rancho Cucamonga, California, at approximately 1:05 a.m., and 4i as further described in the San Bernardino County Sheriff 5; Department's Police Report 01084266 -11, to wit, a bullet wound 6 to the back. This Clain is also based on the subsequent arrest, 7 detention, transportation and prosecution of claimant, Gerry 8 Johns. The personal injuries were sustained as a result of the 9 following circumstances. 10 That at approximately 1:05 a.m. on February 21, 1981, 11 Officer Seelig, in using excessive force and without adequate 12 provocation or without a claim of self- defense, negligently or 13 intentionally injured Gerry Johns by ramming claimant's car and 14 shooting him in the back as he ran from the scene of a car 15 accident. That as a result of said injuries, Gerry Johns . 16 suffered injuries to his back., as well as sustaining other 17 injuries. 18 That officer Seelig, at all times herein mentioned, 19 intentionally used excessive force in effectuating the arrest ' 20 of the claimant, Gerry Johns. 23. The aforementioned governmental entities are addi- 22 tionally negligent in that said governmental entities negli- 23 gently hired, supervised, authorized and ratified the 24 activities of the defendants, and each of them, relative to the 25 1 initial detention, arrest and assault and battery and /or negli- 26 gence in the striking of Gerry Johns, and later criminal prose - 27 cution of claimant Gcrry Johns. 26I 2 The at all tines herein mentioned, the aforementioned 1 individual defendants were acting within the scope of employment 21 relative to their activities in assaulting and battering claim 3' ant. The aforementioned individual defendants were not acting 4i within the scope of employment relative to their malicious 5, 6 prosecution of claimant, Gerry Johns, for activities engaged in 7 or allegedly engaged in. The names of the other police officers and employees B 9 acting on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Sheriff 10 of San Bernardino County are presently unknown to claimant and 11 have therefore been sued herein as defendants Does 1 through 12 100. That at all times herein mentioned, the defendants, 13 14 and each of them, violated various mandatory duties relative to 15 their activities surrounding the assault and arrest of claimant 16 Gerry Johns. 17 The amount claimed by the claimant Gerry Johns as of 16 the date of the presentation of this Claim is computed as 19 follows: 20 Damages Incurred 21 Medical and hospital expenses $ 250,000.00 ( approx.) 22 I Loss of earnings, earning $ _ 750,000_00 (approx.) capacity, special damages and 23 general damages 24 Total Damages Incurred $1,000,000.00 (approx.) 25 All notices or other communications with regard to 26 I this Claim should be sent to the claimant at 630 Cast Rialto, 27 26 �. San Bernardino, California. DATDD: April 24, 1901. BY: sl - ({ki r%-- _____. Cer ry n In Pro er /3 • 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 17, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor GAO GCCn.Ngl 9 u. v c' o F � Z L Y 1977 I SUBJECT: Award of Annual Citywide Landscape and Irrigation Contract As authorized by City Council, bids were solicited and received for providing maintenance to parkway landscape areas. The contract was advertised in the local legal newspaper and mailed to five locally known, responsible contractors. One bid was received. The City's current contractor, Southern California Landscape Maintenance Company (SCLM), submitted a bid for $57,151.44. The bid represents a 78 increase over last year's unit cost of 0.14 cents per square foot per year for maintaining in excess of 8.5 acres of parkways. Based on anticipated assessment district revenues of $40,000, the current contract and proposed additions to the contract will require + $27,900 subsidy from the City's General Fund. Last year's performance by SCIM, Co. has shown they can provide the service with minimal amount of City supervision. A 78 increase in the contract cost seems reasonable as related to current inflation trends. Based on the past eighteen months of service, it is recommended that Council authorize the continuation of the Citywide Parkway and Irrigation Contract with Southern California Landscape Maintenance Company, La Verne, California for $57,151.44 per year. Further, that upon sucessfull completion of twelve months of service, the contract can be renewed for an additional twelve months at a 108 increased based on satisfactory performance by the contractor. Respectfully submitted, Attachments u • 9 CONTRACT PROPOSAL For the City of Rancho Cucamonga, project entitled "Citywide Parkway and Irrigation Maintenance ", contractor shall furnish landscape and irrigation maintenance. The undersigned bidder further declares that he has carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that he has examined the special provisions and specifications, and read the accompanying instructions to bidders, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this proposal is accepted, to furnish all materials and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with -the Special Provisions and Specifications, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the lump sum and unit cost amounts set forth in the schedule on the following Proposal. Description eginm ng Monthly .onth y y Year Cost Approx. Unit Unit Cost (Monthly Cost X 12) Quantity Cost Contract Amount Continuous Parkway Maintenance as 372,080 S Ft. q• .0128 4,762.62 57.151.44 Per Contract Specifications - Fiftyseven thousand one hurdred & Total:£iftyone dollars & fortyfour cents. $ 57,151.44 Words Date: 5 June 1981 Bidder: SCLM Co., INC.�,"� , Contract Renewable for an additional 12 months starting July, 1982. At what percent increase (not to exceed 1001) 10 % Bid Opening Date: June 5, 1981 -5- CITY Or RANCHO CUO NIONG.\ n(6 STAFF REPORT DATE: June 17, 1981 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor SUBJECT: Award of Citywide Street Tree Service Contract As authorized by City Council, bids were solicited and received for providing street tree trimming and removal. The bids are as follows: ALLIED TREE SERVICE $2,250.00 WEST COAST ARBORIST $2,185.00 HOMER'S TREE SURGERY $1,988.00 Of the three bids, two are valid. West Coast Arborist submitted a bid • with mathematical errors. Homer's Tree Surgery is the low bidder. A reference check on Homer's revealed large contracts with CalTrans and Edison Company and minor contracts with various cities. All work was performed to the satisfaction of these agencies. Based on the prices submitted by Homer's and the breakdown of last year's work (see attached) it is anticipated that 1,300 to 1,500 of the 26,000 inventoried trees can be pruned with the budget allocation of $55,000.00. RECOMMENDATION Based on the lowest bid and a good reference check, it is recommended that City Council award the Citywide Street Tree Service contract to Homer's Tree Surgery, Ontario, California for $1,988.00. Further that upon successful completion of twelve months of service, the contract can be renewed for an additional twelve months at a 79 in- crease based on satisfactory performance by the contractor. Res Rj ly ubmitted, LBH: 16 Attachments r • • CONTRACT PROPOSAL 1. ITEMIZED DID FORM $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 Indicate charges for work to specific group and in accordance with the ap- propriate trunk diameter at breast height or height. See Section 4 of Contract Proposal. $- 7U-.67- $_177�-). 7T- $ 18" to e 2. GROUP CHARGES Group I Trunk Diameter 0 -12 12 -24 24'over TOTAL Cost to Raise $ 10.00 $ 20.00 $ 30.00 Cost to Top $ 20.00 $ 35.00 $ 50.00 Cost to Trim $ 25.00 $ 4?:.00 $ 70.00 $ 1li3.00 Cost to Remove _ $ 25.00 $ 0 $ °5.00 $ to0.00 . Tree Height Group II 0' -20' 20' -40' Waver TOTAL Cost to Raise $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 30.00 Cost to Trim $ 20,00 $ O,OJ $ 35.00 $35.000 Cost to Remove $ .00 $ yu.uu $ 120.00 $ eL7.'ST Group III Cost to Raise Cost to Top Cost to Trim Cost to Remove Cost to Remove (leaving stump Trunk Diameter 0 -12" 12 -24" 24 "over TOTAL $ 20.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $�- $ 1 t . $_z7Y-_7T- $ 4__ $_9 -03 $7-17.777- $ c < $ L,5.00 $ ios3o $_77G7_.3T__ $_75) 0 $ 4U -JU- $- 7U-.67- $_177�-). 7T- $ 18" to e TOTAL GROUP CHARGES $1aAP nn 3. EMERGNECY CHARGES Emergency charges shall include all personnel, equipment and any other material used in completing work. A. Minimum service charge shall be at the rate of S " 4 Er, for 2 hours B. Charges beyond minimum time shall be at the rate of $ ? .�per hour Include Equipment 4. Contract nay be extended an additional 12 months starting July 1, 1982. At what perdent increase % (not to exceed 10 ") III in Printed Name of Bidder Homer's Tree Surgery �� • Address of Bidder P,O. Box 640, Ontario, Calif, 91'rte'I1 Name and Address of Member of the Firm (Partner-) —P^ 8, Bnbhv Billy Siyil s n_n.Anx 64C Ontario, Calif. 91701 If a Corporation Signature of Bidder. Title Co— Partner Business Address P.O. Box 640, Ontario, Calif. Incorporated under the laws of the State of President State License Number 295796 • Secretary Treasurer vI I l • • • EJ /V .L 1 /L U 1 1 &- &L16 FFiaWKLyN CONTRACT PROPOSA:. 1. ITEMIZED BID FOR14 Indicate charges for work to specific group and in accordance with the ap- propriate trunk diameter at breast height or height. See Section 4 of Contract Proposal. 2. GROUP CHARGES Group I Trunk Diameter 0 -12 12 -24 24 "over TOTAL Cost to Raise $ $ 70; $ ,7•f- $ 5.4,E Cost to Top $,- $ $ rys,- E Cost to Trim $ .q„ - $ A';: - $ $ Cost to Remove $ 25.• ' $ T3S.., $ $ Tree Height Group II 0' -20' 20' -4t1' 40'over TOTAL Cost to Raise $ ,5._ $ /O,' $ ri7- $��5.•' Cost to Trim $ .fs $ LO, - $ 70.•' E /2.5..� Cost $ Group III Cost to Raise Cost to Top Cost to Trim Cost to Remove Cost to Remove (leaving stump Trunk Diameter 0 -12" 12 -24" 24 "over TOTAL $ $ ..'S•' $_�2,_ $ Grit ' $ mss'- $ Jvo. ' $ 78$ to a ght $- -�'v7' $ TOTAL GROUP CHARGES $ 2250. `- 3. EIXERGNEC'( CHARGES Emergency charges shall include all personnel, equipment and any other material used in completing work. A. Minimum service charge shall be at the rate of $_iii G7 ` - for __hours B. Charges beyond minimum time shall be at the rate of $ 6,61 C-"- per hour 4. Contract may be extended an additional 12 months starting July 1, 1982. At what perdent increase _C? _% (not to exceed 10;) Printed Name of Bidder & L LW 7t?,,=I,=- . By Address of Bidder �,?O /LAvfaw' �9r -T,s F�S�rX'/ °� fOd.Ta Name and Address of Member of the Firm If a Corporation Signature of Bidder By In+Mli✓ Title Business Address Incorporated under the laws of the State of President State License Number • Secretary. Treasurer YI IJ • CONTRACT PROPOSAL • 1• ITEMIZED BID FORM Indicate charges for work to specific group and propriate trunk diameter at breast height Contract in accordance with he the ap- Proposal. or height. See Section 4 of 2. GROUP CHARGES Group I 0_12 Trunk Diameter Cost to Raise Cost $ 2— 12 -24 $ 24 "over TOTAL to Top Cost to Trim g 5.000 o— oo 40.00 $— s_oo — $ so. oo $ $ 110.00 Cost to Remove $ 4— 50.00 - -__ $ 7s.00 $ 100 io. o0 $---2o. 00 n $ 170 nn $ r 0 S95 o _..1�o 00 ��_ un nn Tree Height Group II 0' -20' 20' -40' 40'over Cost to Raise TOTAL Cost to Trim $ Cost to Remove $ z�— � 4��'00 $ 5•n0 $ 40 00 $ 5 pn $ an on $ 1g n^ $'�ao - -- $ 60,00 $ an 00 nn $ inn n • Group III 0 -12" Trunk Diameter Cost to Raise $ 12 -24" 24 "over TOTAL Cost to Top Cost to trim $ -3o.00 1500_ -- $ 2__ s�o $ 8- s.00_ g 3� oo $ § n0,00 Cost to Remove $ 6' $ 1zs.oa 175.00 E zoo.00 $ so nn Cost to Remove $ 80.00 — $ 180.0 —�_ $ 5 $ 385 oo 7 (leaving stump 18" in e�"7g4— $ 160 .pp_ z2_ oo $ 200.00 § 495 00 $ --�_ 4330,0_, 14 TOTAL GROUP CHARGES E_z,18s 010, 3. EMERGNECY CHARGES Emergency charges shall include all personnel, equiment and any other material used in completing work, p A. Minimum service charge shall be at the rate of $ so.00`hour for 2 hours B. Charges beyond minimum time shall be at the rate of $ s0_ 00 per hour Contract may be extended an additional 12 months starting July 1, 1992. what perdent increase --,Q % (not to exceed 10';) 111 I4 At Printed Name of Bidder WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC. • BY PAUL BREGE. DX� Address of Bidder 7072 THOMAS STREET, BUENA PARK 90621 Name and Address of Member of the Firm PAT MAHONEY 1833 N. SHAFFER ORANGE, CA 92665 Tf a Corporation Signature of Bidder lt/p 4j/ �Ara6/ Ar�j)r,S-{t By_ W_64,2 2 n o/ Title GENERAL MANAGER ., Business Address7072 THOMAS STREET, BUENA PARK 90621 Incorporated under the laws of the State of california President Patrick Mahoney State License Number 366764 Secretary Iuliamne Mahone Treasurer Michael Mahoney VI CITY -WIDE STREET TREE SERVICE AGREEMENT • This agreement, made and entered into this day of 1931, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga herein called 'City and (herein called "Contractor "): Section 1: The Contractor, in consideration of the promises of the City, hereby agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, labor and materials necessary to perform and complete, in a good workmanlike manner, the street tree main- tenance in strict accordance with specifications entitled "Citywide Street Tree Service" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in accordance with the Contractor are hereby made a part of this contract. Section 2: The City, in consideration of the performance of this contract, agrees to pay the contractor on a monthly basis for work completed as per contract proposal for a period of twelve months beginning July 1, 1981 and ending June 30, 1982. Contract may be renewed for an additional 12 months starting July 1, 1982, provided contract is mutually acceptable. Section 3: As provided in the specifications, the City shall have the right during the term of this agreement to review with the Contractor the work which has been performed. If, in tho opinion of the City Engineer, the street tree service has not been performed in a satisfactory manner the City may, upon three (3) days notice in writing to the Contractor, cancel this contract. In the event of cancellation, monies due the Contractor or retained under the terms of the contract, shall be forfeited to the City, not to exceed the amount necessary to correct deficiencies in the street • tree service. Section 4. The Contractor shall commence work under this agreement on July 1, 1931. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this contract as of the date herein above specified. City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Mayor Attest: Approved as to form: 11 City Attorney Contractor By: V 1p 0 • Is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STMT REPORT DATE: June 17, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Reimbursement and Reacceleration Agreements for Assessment District 79 -1 Attached for Council consideration are Reimbursement and Reacceleration Agreements for the Industrial Assessment District. These agreements cover reimbursement for improvements constructed or to be constructed as outlined in the agreement. Both agree- ments have been reviewed and approved by Mac Brown. Reimbursement is contingent only upon completion of the District and bond sale. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing execution of the Reimbursement and Reacceleration Agreements for Assessment District 79 -1. Respectfully submitted, T /' J LBH:blc Attachment 17 0 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1 PURCHASE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , by -nd between the CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, a municipal corpo- ration, hereinafter referred to as "City ", and R. C. LAND COMPANY, a California general partnership, as property owner, hereinafter referred to as "Property Owner ". WHEREAS, City, At this time, is considering the formation of a spacial assessment district under the terms and conditions • of the "Municipal Improvement Act ee 1913 ", beinq Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of street and other improvements, together With appurtenances and appurtenant work within the incorporated limits of said City, said special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1 (hereinafter re- ferred to as the "Assessment District "); and WHEREAS, the improvements proposed to be constructed in said Assessment District Consist of certain storm drain faril- Sties and major street improvements in 6TH STREET, MILLIKEN AVENUE, CLEVELAND AVENUE, and other streets; and WHEREAS, Section 66462 of the Government Code of the State of California (Subdivision Map Act) expressly authorises financing and completion of public improvements under an appro- priate special assessment act, and Section 10102 of the streets and Highways Code ( "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 "), ex- pressly authorises the acquisition of any improvements author- Is iced to be constructed under said law; and I�_ 0 WHEREAS, Property Owner, in order to proceed with its development, has constructed, or is constructing, certain pur- tions of improvements that are proposed to be included within the work of the Assessment District, namely, certain storm drain facilities and portions of the work within SIR STREET, MILLIKEN AVENUE and PITTSBURGH AVENUE; and WHEREAS, City and Property Owner are in agreement that said Works of improvement within said above streets shall be includ- ed within the Assessment District proceedings at prices deter- mined by the City Engineer and City Council to be reasonable, said prices being a lesser price than proposed for the works of Improvements to be bid for Said Assessment District; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this Agreement to provide that Property Owner ahall, upon a successful confirmation of assess- . Sent and tale of bonds for the above referenced Assessment trict, be paid for the works of improvements, which are inte- gral and a part of the above referenced Assessment District, at the prices as determined by City and Property Owner; and WHEREAS, City has no objection to purchasing the improve- ments from said Property Owner, and Property Owner is desirous that City purchase said facilities, and at this time said im- provement$ are owned by Property Owner and are not constructed within any dedicated public rights of way of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NOW, THEREFORE, IT 15 MUTUALLY AGREED between the respec- tive parties as followsi SECTION 1, The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The City Council does intend to proceed with the adoption of a resolution of intention and the formation of -2- • I a spf't sl assessment district for the improvements above described. SECTION 1. The City agrees to boy and finance through the use of special assessment proceedings, and Property Owner agrees to convey certain completed improvements to the City, those improvements being portions Of 6TH STREET, MILLIKEN AVENUE and PInSSURGH AVENUE, as described in the referenced attached and incorporated Exhibit 'A•. SECTION a. The prices to be paid for said improvements are prices determined by the City Engineer and the City Council to be reasonable and agreed upon by the Property Owner. Said Prices are set forth in the referenced Exhibit "S• attached hereto and incorporated. • SECTION 5. The cost for said works of improvements shall be spread in accordance with the benefits received, as deter- mined by the City Council; provided, however, that with the exception of the cost of the Pittsburgh Avenue improvements, the basis for each spread shall he tF' same basis used in Spreading the cost of the other improvements to be constructed I 1 through the special assessment proceedings. SECTION 6. Said money shall be paid t0 Property Owner upon the successful Sale of bonds for the above referenced Assess- Sent District. SECTION 7. The Property Owner will transfer to the City title to the improvements described in Exhibit "A" as soon as reasonably practical after it receives notice from the City that the City has available the amount of the purchase price therefor. In order that said improvements may he utilized by the City pending the transfer thereof to the City, the Property Owner hereby grants to the City, for the benefit of the public, -3- a license to use said improvements'and to operate and maintain them during said period (provided, however, that this license shall expire two years from the date of this agreement unless aooner terminated by the transfer of the improvements); and the City Will he solely responsible for the operation and main- tenance of said improvements during the period of this license. The provisions of this section to the contrary not- withstanding, the Property Owner may at its option transfer title to all or any part of said improvements to the City prior to receipt of the City's notice of availability of funds, and the City agrees to accept the same within thirty days after receipt of the Company's offer. SECTION S. The City's obligation hereunder to pay the Property Owner for the aforesaid improvements is contingent upon the confirmation of assessment and successful sale of bonds and shall be null and void if said bonds are not sold within a two (2) year period following the date of this Agree- went. SECTION 9. Prior to selling all or any portion of its property lying between Fourth and Sixth Streets and between Cleveland and Rochester Avenues, the Property Owner will cause a copy of this Agreement to be delivered to each prospective purchaser of such property and will cause a copy of its letter of transmittal to be delivered to the City Engineer. Notwith- standing any such sale, any amounts required to be paid here- under shall be paid to A. C. Land Company and not to the pur- chaser(.). SECTION 10. This Agreement is binding on heirs, assigns, and successors in interest. I I is 0 • 9 IN WITNESS WMEREOP, the parties hereto have Caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized repre- sentatives. R. C. LAND COMPANY : B t- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: dITY CLERK, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA APP E S FORM: P. Esq. Bon Counsel r) r) i:;w -5- C� EAMIBIT 'A• COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS Streets 1) 6th Street - full street improvements foe the southerly half of the street from the centerline of talliken Avenue to a point approximately 1150 feet easterly thereof. 2) Pittsburgh Avenue - full street improvements from 4th Street to 6th street. 3) Milliken Avenue - full street improvements for the easterly half of the street from 4th Street to 6th Street. Storm Drains • 1) 4th Street - 48 inch line from Pittsburgh Avenue to a point approximately 850 feet easterly thereof. 2) 4th Street and Milliken Avenue - drainage System connecting to the existing drainage facility crossing 4th Street. IN -6- • L I an M. V. I ..W., .... .. .I O[IIMMCXO CUCAMGNQA 1.0... . ..... ....... EXHIBIT 'A- EAMIeIT '9" COSTS I) Value of rights of way not dedicated as of the date of the Agreement 6th Street - 30' ) To be determined on the same basis as the value of other rights of way to be acquired Milliken Avenue - 304) by the City in Connection with the Assessment District (standard City acquisition practice, including N.A.I. appraiser) 2) Engineering Streets $ 12,786 Storm drains 6 005005. Total: $ 1a. 791 3) Construction Contract Costs Streets $525,644 Storm drains 78 3722 Total: $604,016 -7- C/ 9 0 AGREEMENT RE: ACCELERATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1 THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this _ day of by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corpo- ration (the 'City'), and R. C. LAND COMPANY, a California general partnership, as the owner of certain real property located within the City (the •Property Owner'). • R E C I T A L S This Agreement is predicated upon the following facts: A. The City is presently Considering the formation of a special assessment district under the terms and conditions of the 'Municipal Improvement Act of 1913•, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of street and other improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the incorporated limits of said City, said special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1 (the 'Assessment District'). a. The improvements proposed to be constructed in said Assessment District consist of certain storm drain facilities and major street improvements in 6TH STREET, MILLIMEN AVENUE, CLEVELAND AVENUE, and other streets (collectively, the 'Improvements'). Is (;,?6 C. In order to facilitate the development of land located within the Assessment District, the Property Owner may wish to construct, or cause to be constructed, some or all of the Improvements proposed to be located In the vicinity of the Property Owner's land in advance of the time when such con- struction would otherwise occur pursuant to proceedings being taken in connection with the Assessment District. D. The City and the Property Owner agree that such an acceleration of construction of the Improvements would be bene- ficial to the area proposed to be included within the Assess- ment District and that the Property Owner should be reimbursed for the costs incurred by the Property Owner in connection with said construction, such reimbursement to be contingent upon the successful sale by the City of bonds of the Assessment District • E. The Property Owner also wishes that certain street and storm drain improvements, in addition to the Improvements, be constructed and financed pursuant to the proceedings for the Assessment District; and, provided that the Property Owner is willing to bear the additional assessments associated there- with, the City is willing to include such additional assess- ments within the proceedings for the Assessment District. NON, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, and for and in consideration of the mutual promisee, representations, and agreements herein contained, hereby agree as follows: SECTION 1. Additional Improvements. At the sole option of the Property Owner, which may be exercised by written notice to the City at any time prior to the adoption of the City's resolution confirming assessments in connection with the Assessment District, the City will cause to be included among CC ,97 U r� the improvements proposed to be constructed and financed through the proceedings for the Assessment District, the improvements may be imposed against said lands or (b) agreed to pay in cash to the City the portion of the costs of such added improvements as, in the judgment of the City's assessment engineer, will be of special benefit to lands other than the land owned by the Property Owner. SECTION 3. Acceleration of Construction. (a) Plans and Specifications /Bids. In the event the Prop- erty Owner wishes to cause the construction of any of the Improvements or the additional improvements referred to in Section 1 hereof, the Property Owner may have prepared plans and specifications for such work and submit the same to the City Engineer for his review and approval. Upon receipt of such approval from the City Engineer, the Property Owner may request bids for such work from licensed contra Ctors qualified _j_ acquisition of land for and the construction of any and all of the street and storm drain improvements specified in Exhibit •A' hereto as the Property Owner may specify, provided that: (i) in the case of such additional improvements which, In the judgment of the City'a assessment engineer, will be of special benefit only to land owned by the Property Owner, the Property Owner shall have agreed that the additional assessment attrib- utable to such added improvements may be imposed upon the land of the Property Owner, and (ii) in the case of added improve- ments which, in the judgement of the CLty's assessment en- gineer, will specially benefit other lands in addition to the land owned by the Property Owner, the Property Owner shall have • either: (a) obtained the agreement of the owners of such other lands that the additional assessment attributable to the added improvements may be imposed against said lands or (b) agreed to pay in cash to the City the portion of the costs of such added improvements as, in the judgment of the City's assessment engineer, will be of special benefit to lands other than the land owned by the Property Owner. SECTION 3. Acceleration of Construction. (a) Plans and Specifications /Bids. In the event the Prop- erty Owner wishes to cause the construction of any of the Improvements or the additional improvements referred to in Section 1 hereof, the Property Owner may have prepared plans and specifications for such work and submit the same to the City Engineer for his review and approval. Upon receipt of such approval from the City Engineer, the Property Owner may request bids for such work from licensed contra Ctors qualified _j_ 11 to perform such work and will cause such bids to be delivered to it at the office of the City Engineer, there to be opened in his presence. Upon completion of its review of such bids, and subject to the approval of the City Engineer, the Property Owner may award a contract for the construction of such work to the lowest responsible bidder; and, if it awards such a con- tract, the Property Owner will deliver an executed copy thereof to the City Engineer. (b) Construction. Thereafter, the Property Owner will cause such work to be constructed as provided for in the plans and specifications referred to in subparagraph (a) and will allow such work to be inspected by the City Engineer at any and all times during the performance thereof. In the event that any change in the work is proposed, the Property Owner will • submit copies of all correspondence and documentation pertain- ing thereto to the City Engineer for his review and approval. (c) Permits. Subject to its normal review process and upon payment of any applicable fees, the City will issue to the Property Owner and /or to the contractor selected to perform the work any and all licenses, permits, and approvals required by it in connection with the work described in subparagraph (a), including but not limited to the licenses, permits and ap- provals required to install improvements in public rights of way if any of the work is to be constructed in such public rights of way. (d) Disposition of Improvements. Upon the completion by the Property Owner of any of the work described in subparagraph (a) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer any portion thereof which is located within a right of way owned by the City will be deemed to be offered by the Property owner for C • 0 dedication to the City and shall be accepted by the City within 30 days thereafter or at such other time as may be mutually agreeable. The City shall have no obligation of any kind what- soever to compensate the Property Owner for any portion of any such improvement located within a City -owned right of way. Upon completion by the Property Owner of any of the work described in subparagraph (a) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the Property Owner will sell to the City, and the City will purchase from the Property Owner the portion or portions thereof which are not located in a City -owned right of way. However, in effecting the purchases described in this subparagraph, the City shall not be required to pay the Prop- erty owner from any funds other than such amounts as may be made available to it through the proceedings for the Assessment • District. (e) Compensation. The amount of compensation to be paid to the Property Owner by reason of the provisions of this sec- tion shall be the am of the following: (1) the value of any right of wry which is not dedi- cated to the City as of the date of this Agreement, which r� �v _J Shall be determined in accordance with the method selected for determining the value of other rights of way acquired In connection with the Assessment District, consistent with standard city acquisition practices (including an M.A.I. appraiser), provided, that compensation shall be payable only for rignt of way for the Improvements, and not for right of way for additional improvements specified in Erhibit 'A'; (ii) the engineering costs actually incurred by the Property Owner in the preparation of the plans and specifi- 30 -5- 0 cations for the improvement and in the supervision of the contract, but only to the extent that such costs are de- termined to be reasonable by the City Engineer; and (iii) the costs actually incurred by the Property Owner in coenection with the construction of the improvement; provided, however, that the same shall not exceed the amount of the lowest responsible bid for such week, plus the amount of any change orders approved by the City Engineer. (f) Transfer of Ownership. The Property Owner will trans- fer to the City title to the improvements constructed by the Property Owner pursuant to this section as soon as reasonably practical after it receives notice from the City that the City has available the amount of the purchase price therefor. In order that said improvements may be utilized by the City pend- ing the transfer thereof to the City, the Property Owner hereby grants to the City, for the benefit of the public, a license to use said improvements and to operate and maintain them during said period (provided, however, that this license shall expire two years from the date of this agreement unless sooner term- inated by the transfer of the improvements); and the City will be solely responsible for the operation and maintenance of said improvements during the period of this license. The provisions of this section to the contrary notwithstanding, the Property Owner may at its option transfer title to all or any part of said improvements to the City prior to receipt of the City's notice of availability of funds, and the City agrees to accept the lama within thirty days after receipt of the Company's offer, (g) Contingent Obligation. The City's obligation here- under to pay the Property Owner for the aforesaid improvements . -6- 3 0 is contingent upon the confirmation of assessment and success- ful sale of bonds and shall be null and void if said bonds are not sold within a two (2) year period following the date of this Agreement. SECTION 3. Prior to selling all or any portion of its property lying between Fourth and Sixth Streets and between Cleveland and Rochester Avenues, the Property Owner will cause a copy of this Agreement to be delivered to each prospective purchaser of such property and will cause a copy its letter of transmittal to be delivered to the City Engineer. Notwith- standing any such sale, any amounts required to be paid here- under shall be paid to R.C. Land Company and not to the put- 0 U C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA chase r(s). SECTION a. The Property Owner shall not assign or . transfer all or any part of this 19reement, or any right here- under, to any person other than Aoll /Lyon Associates, a Cali- fornia general partnership. However, in the event that all or any portion of the Property Owner's land which is described in Section 3 hereof is sold, at the request of the Property Owner and the subsequent purchasers) the City will enter into an agreement substantially similar to this Agreement with the put- chaser(s) thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representa- tives. R. C. LAND_ COMPANY aL � Sy: 0 U C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pj EXHIBIT A ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS Street improvements, including grading, paving, curbs and gutters, but excluding street lights and public utility facilities for the following: 1. A new street to run from 4th Street to 6th Street approximately 700 feet westerly of the proposed right of way of New Rocnester Avenue. 3. The improvements to the ultimate right of way of: (a) the westerly half of New Rochester Avenue between • 4th Street and 6th Street; (b) the easterly half of Milliken Avenue between 4th Street and 6th Street; (o) the westerly half of Cleveland Avenue between 4th Street and 6th Street; and (d) the southerly half of 6th Street from Cleveland Avenue to New Rochester. • V RESOLUTION NO. 8 I - & 7 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND REACCELERATION OF STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 79 -1. WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has directed the continuation of Industrial Assessment District No. 79 -1 and; WHEREAS, in order to complete the improvements within said district in the most rapid and cost effective manner, and; WHEREAS, certain developers have requested that they receive reimbursement from the district for improvement constructed on an accelerated schedule, and; WHEREAS, to accomplish said reimbursement agreements are required limiting and defining City responsibility in construction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Reimbursement and Reacceleration Agreements are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said . Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 0 Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor �H. 0 �-.. a yr nr.. w.nv v.V�.H rvlvlVUH MEMORANDUM DATE: June 17, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 4837, Bonds and Agreement The subject parcel map was approved by the City Engineer on June 16, 1980 for the division of .83 acres into 3 lots located at 6931 Amethyst Street in the R -1 zone. The subdivider, Edward R. Kohler, has submitted an agreement and bonds to insure the installation of off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance $10,000.00 Labor S Material $ 51000.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Council and City Engineer to sign Parcel Map 4837 and accept the agreement and bonds. yyRespectfully submitted, LBH:BK:jaa Attachments v � RESOLUTION NO. 91 '`c�6 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4837, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 4837) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 4837, submitted by Associated Engineers, and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the east side of Amethyst Street, between Monte Vista and 19th Street, being a division of a portion of Lot 3, Block 8 of Cucamonga Homestead Association was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on June 6, 1980; and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 4837 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable improvement security by Edward R and Elaine J. Kohler as developer; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map Number 4837 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of ,1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk is 7� Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor 0 TENTATIVE N,,, B, I ,H,,,, PARCEL MAP NO. 4837 NIN..., IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BE " NO A DIVISION Of A PORTION OF LOT )• BLOCK E. OF mow•" r "` "� CVCAUONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION, AS RECOROEO IN BOON 6 OF MAPS, PAGE AB, RECOROS OF SAN BERNAR04NO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ful• rl _ I 4 SCALE ICI' • SO' _M1M[TECNLN BtNE[1 � NOTE 'i .PARCEL T +iy`:."�a`a cc IF- 7 'i .PARCEL T ' r PA9�tC B '3 ,ICI• a.v .. =•r M. 1ef % ." i. '� — � —Y._I s n� IF VISTA _S�RQTJr_, IF- 7 CITY OF Rod "0 CUC1irX1Cs IVP,e,OVEYf - .,REE"ENT Frw PARCEI. !pp CIO. 4839 KNOW ALL MEN BY TiESE `RESENTS: That this agreement is lade and entered into, in conformance with the crovis ions of the t'unicipal Code and P.egulations of the City of Rancho Cicarcc,a, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and Edward R. F Elaine J. Kohler herernar[er re ferretl to as the 'veveloper. NITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the City of Parcel Map Humber 4R37 in accordance with the provisions of the report of the City Erc meer ' real, and any amencnen -S thereto; located E/S Amethyst Street, between Monte Vista and 19th Street and, WHEREAS, the City has established certain recuirenents to be net by said Dev- eloper prior to granting :he final approval of the parcel ma :; and, WHEREAS, the execution of this agree - =nt and posting of ;mprn verert security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the cupose of securino said approval; 1104, THEREFORE. it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees :r construct at Developer's expense all ' inproveaents described on Pace 3 hereof within nine r:onths from the date iroreof, as per Section f.12 of Ordinance tie. 23. 2. The term of this ay'eelreat shall be nine months corsnennnq on the data of execution hereof by the City. Nis agreement shall be in alefault an the day following tic last day of the tern stipulated, unless said term has been extended as hereinafter provided. 3. The ;eveloper may request additional time in which to complete the Pro- visions of this agreement, in writing, not less than `our weeks prior to the default date, and including a 5ta Lemullt Of clrcLnstances of necessity for additirnal trnla. In consideration cf 5u^ -h rrupost. the City reserves :he rljht to revi ^V the pro'ii Slogs hereof, including construction standards, cost est ID :a tC. and sufficiency of the lmp,'overent security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or nen;ectI to coup] y with the Provisions of this agreement, the City shall rave ]he right at any tine to cause said provisions to he COmpleted by 1111Y la.:ful ^en5, and thereudlen to recover than Said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. 5. Enu'oachment pennirs shall be nitnrried by the Developer from the office of the City Coninrnr pr'rnr to start of any wor'x within the public right of way, and top Developer shall cnndhct Such work in full Cenpl ranee with the re- gulations contained thCreln. HPn- ao :nplinnce may remit in stopping of the vmrk by the City, and aSSes Stoont or the penalties provided. 6. puhllc right of wnv 1 ^r,nve PL :.lnp reeuired shall be ccnr,truei Pd in con - fonnnte rrth ap prvry n•t u•n r ^v rnw n.rt 111,19, Stamm rq Snecl (r r.rt one, and Stindin d !i a.,"ls rl'i .rn•; -,I (•f la; lm ^rl h "nt5 .the,'nt0. Cru,trclt,no shall rncllvui any it nnS :Li ^n; an mn -I /nr o,pnr rmnta w l ork lenrrpd nOCrssary for dral,len er publ,r, sdfot? , RCE12A i� • Repo 2 TMPROV"IENT AGREEMENT 7. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to comple- tion; the City shall have the right to comPlete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and/or his contractor by any lawful means. B. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or re- moval of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right of way resulting from work done on the adjacent property or within said right of way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terns of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement security shall be not less than the amount shown below: IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED: Faithful Performance Bond Material and Labor Bond • Improvement Security Instrument 5101000.00 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Parties hereto ha+e oused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the daces set forth opposite their signatures: /REVELOPER BY: —DATE: GATE: i_sl- WITNESS: DATE: _` -` - -'i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA a municipal corporation BY: ,MAYOR ATTEST _ CITY CLERK OAT C: .. a ne.. w.,=..�a .e >...e_EpwARp_ R. KOO F.R_ amH._P.IAJNE J._,KoHLEb_ wanes -.1— 111 a FC L •' ^ 091,h [ !W F Q \ a .n Sp lEfro A HbIROW EL 04 l'o "a i l telS COJat\1 . I'M n P. RAII 1 �i C.01111:,q CFINM�L%: N IN AN! U)ND ESTPTAM'. ENCROACIMTE4T VU�X'T rEC SCIVENILE (Arl.lh I,, "T,, cr—', w,,') 0 DATE: REMIT :10. COMPUTED ny Bob S. File Reference w lAgw City Drawing No, NOTE: Dec, act include fee for ete,ri re,la, .1.11 dcla.iL.. I T%M I'! ANTM 19 Ti UNTT M"T 5 MIT Mmm P.C.C. —1 ''r. •243 r. 6.00 1 453 I' I C. ". r "I I r , I . I , — I. —7— —0 --747— 751 1.71 all 2 1 n P., I'1, in Y. F. ILVIII EI�I'Vdli 'V I Y. [,,.-.t,d E,1, 100 Iq I on inn of S,b,d, linn IR ifia • I I no 02 11 q \.C. (11- LJOI) vlll) N A.C. (e), to "I'D ..'I 1 17 1.C. rvlar S110 I., a')') I11,11 r,N A, C. nJ. 61 nn c. 1�' rhick I.C. Norliv 4390 11,dI, Id -,I1 %, I I r IL ,I :—do I rA. I son on 1 1211 c rrwa Ire PA, r.1. sa�cit 250 500 REn T I Ja: ':.11.1.." 1 r, M.01 i:\, LS T . F . T ... 1. TOTAL COISTR"TION COST 510,060.00 V:'Vr'Tlr ; I'll I TOTAI, TZISPECTIM; Fr.,j . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . It 1, IOC 1 I't 3 (111 If Tot I r 1;IIt1.1ti— ,,t 1, S TOTAL 1 %q60 FALUIt'll R'rtnrn mee rr, I Na t: oat and L,11 P,n nJ ...... � Bend Call, I"'. (,It q Inpro , em,;t Secui t� Is $10,000.00 RCE22E ®ut�®�Ma Mmm I TOTAI, TZISPECTIM; Fr.,j . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . It 1, IOC 1 I't 3 (111 If Tot I r 1;IIt1.1ti— ,,t 1, S TOTAL 1 %q60 FALUIt'll R'rtnrn mee rr, I Na t: oat and L,11 P,n nJ ...... � Bend Call, I"'. (,It q Inpro , em,;t Secui t� Is $10,000.00 RCE22E • 0 CITY or RAINCI-0 CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 17, 1981 "fie TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreements for Parcel Map 6206 Daon Corp., developer of Parcel Mal 6206, located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Haven Avenue has submitted an agreement and security for the construction of the median island on Haven Avenue. The attached resolution is for the acceptance of the above referenced agreement and bonds. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and accept the agree- ment and security on behalf of the City. Respectfully submitted, LBH:B 7aa Attachments H I • • 9 �a f Mw�•m�.e s.t. �'.c, 1.vs Srvl f'Til 'Sr o°WS d�'°M/�'O Ave[' d.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL lIAP 110. 6206 KIIO14 ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and Oaon Corporation heretnafter referred to as the Developer. WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the City of Parcel pap Number 6206 in accordance with the provisions of the report of the Clty Engineer thereon, and any amendments thereto; located Haven Avenue between Axxow Route and Foothill Blvd. and, WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said Dev- eloper prior to granting the final appraval of the parcel map; and, WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to he equivalent to prior completion of said requirements far the pupose of securing said approval; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all • improvements described on Page 3 hereof within nine months from the date hereof, as per Section 2.12 of Ordinance No. 28. 2. The term of this agreement shall be nine months commencing on the date of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said tern has been extended as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the pro- visions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time, In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause Said provisions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. S. Encroachment pemits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right of way, and the Developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the re- gulations contained therein. lion - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public right of way impro"e ent work required shall be constructed in con - fomance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendrents thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. • RCE12A 0 Page 2 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 7. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to comple- tion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8, The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or re- moval of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all laose rock and other debris from the public right of way resulting from work done on the adi,,ccnt property or within said right of way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shalt he subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement security shall be not less than the amount shown below: IMPROVEMENT SFCURITY SUBMITTED: Faithful performance Bond 1411 GOO • Material and Labor Bond 121.Sno ' 1 LJ IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures: p 0 VELOPER 8Y:AT 7i y' / / /1R � DATE: 5122/81 e sar ce res ent, COmm�Ind -- B DATE: 5f i orr n, enera onager, own. n . �' I �� i DATE: `' z SCI OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA a mui nicipal corporation ATTEST:_ ,CITY CLERK DATE: RCE128 �I CIV OF RANCHO CTCLMO!:CA CO)IS- %CT1ON ANI COND ESTCL\.. E::CRJACICIENT PF. IIT FFC SCHEDULE (dcc.ach to "[na Pec tor's Copy") DATE: Mnv 12,1981 PEMIT YO. CONFUTED eY J. Stofa. Jr. File Rciarence PM 6206 city DruvinR N, SHT 495 of 20 NOTE: Does not include current fee far vritis; perm[ or pavenen: - eplace- rent deposits. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIIUTE iTFV 38,423 6:AVTSTY U ^:JT UNTT COST S .V 1+ FAITIRCL PERFOS:ANCE POND (100':) 43,000 In RnR AND nvcscAL BOND ISOI:) 21,500 EStNECR1VC IN SPECTIOY FEF., 2,060 (FEE SCHEUFLF.) ply -0' • A.C. 2 1 in f 1- 1'C.-. Sid,"Ii I S. F. o" a ,\oor.,,rn F. S[reet 1 r on ati VEmbanCC.cn[ I C.S. Inour:ce i,n C.'f. 3 00 P1n11.1c, , S.F. •, ) I A.t. ?:e r 1109 I'll) I TI`N A. C, 1900 to 1900 Cons) TUN \ r M1;nd +- [ 0110 'on') DV TUN 1, ,do 'm, S,C 5" 71¢ PO:cn A. c. Ico-n,M I 1 230 s .\. C, IAerl.av Ae S.F. 5.\. Au In c; C.O. In vraie E.% . ldi,, r % %. A. FA. I.A. 2 460 LF 1 .00 w 0 5. 8.QUU I 1 1 I 1 I 7 h CONSTRUCTION COST 38,423 CONTINGENCY COSTS 4,577 TOLV. CONSTaccTIDN COST, 43,000 FAITIRCL PERFOS:ANCE POND (100':) 43,000 In RnR AND nvcscAL BOND ISOI:) 21,500 EStNECR1VC IN SPECTIOY FEF., 2,060 (FEE SCHEUFLF.) XP:XM:;TATION RONTI (0SH) -0' • 0 • I Nit F 7963332 PRSFtLM $323.00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and DION CORPORATION (hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated rant, 22 19�L, and identified as project Rarctut corimmeno. Master Rmlect, Afro✓ c Heven Avenue, Rancho OR. parcel M *6206 is hereby re:erred to and made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and NATIONAL FIRE INSURPNCE COTANY OF HARrfUim a Connecticut CO atial , as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "City "), in the penal sum Of _- _ ---- _ ------- _ _ ..f ars I 41 n,., o_ - -) iewtul money of the United States, for the payment of which snm well and truly to be made, we bind Ourselves, Our heirs, successors, execu- tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors. administrators, Wore or ,.nr�u -- — m sw.. r.xu! T ,b :w abide muwrr o Orange 'Ondi- to be NaY 22. _1901 _—_. —. M: • :M Ma.••w^<d to ec .,. s..,.. n Richard Yerry.� apee- •ieAdID1R._n..ww nn,, _Ron 0. Miller it and ? mM. _BlrectnL Lands,•e..•vam,w�.e..:M, ..w.M n...x.n. van.... 1 officers, :em.ain Ginn .nd Invn. n +, enM .4 emain in F .n.••�m.nr m b "wl eIMM ,> , m rM•e.n nwme. .e UL1A M. 814N. n n .ow add x.asn�n 9 ...dw rnaci.Far,v.r ddition It ... e. n..w.•.wwwn .r n,u waraawn eluded y tFF rpAwL4,FXah iF4. 11.1961 able at- d wnry g such ess .,n n,.w/ judgment Ulla N.B. Overby____ _ nge ex- - rvmn.AnsP,.. -_.— Inn.... r. w..x -I.. I.w the ... ...____..___ ... -he speC- ___�- fir =ti.vs -- 62]208 F STATE OF CfLIlOtc21i1 w COUNtY OF OM Z 1/ arrr<r.e F9.e 111 {F(1(( HµF ttI.AB[IH FFLIOA '{ir�4 .w.e. �! .,M ww.1a,R . 1. i. _p!arl_Pl }:abetJl. Reptor rvolwv vu:nem OraeKle__Cnwir.mme Sl+t+ol a .,Omia ,do hanaminm111ha1T,, S_F111er __ AmmheYinfact, al the Nn,me fin Ine!ww Camp+nr 01 N+Mad .h. he _ nevOW", F,wwn la me lob IM von! "v e. noon name _ =s tdivit,,la lrv<Iae9o:nq:nllrumenl, +mimed Int na 11n1 -11 in Fe,wn. and nknowreJpd that ne 5:q:!d, wwd and hadvev d and:nmument I., and on sehall of me NaendA Fee Ineurama Company of Hanlard, Iw 1M Gina and o:/ooullFau.n eat lam Given under car hand and net. A Feet 1 my o fen:n the Gtr of COS" Ne. M mid ConarlY, this 216t 0 19 _22 / Nau!v aahsa. SDND R 7963332 PP LM Slociuded LABOR AND )fr1TERIALIIEI BO::) 0 NH*_RE.15, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and pACN' CJRFOPATIW (hereinafter designated as prrncrpal") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer- tain designated ueblic uc. improvements, which said agreement, dated a_22 1951 , and identified as pro- a Mastur ' Arrow 6 Haven A man h2 R a CA. Parcel Mao %6206 rs hereby referred to and ma e a pare hereof; and, mIEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re- quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cuca- monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NON, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material - men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the Sum Of twenty -one thguianIf fi vn Fnn,ir e,l___— _ mace rW urnished of labor thereon of anv kind, or for amounts due under rk or labor, couxn or_�Orange__ _ }° ceedine the 1 ---MM -n 1199.1 brought thereof, ..a xm, w,.�. r, mo• -.e _ Ai<herE Verrya _ »�•� =•...M m..V,P .9tL0jp„r, a.., .a Ron H onab at- 9_,111er ing such •�,. -.ma.M Di rectal to be taxed I —, .Ae ..vwN IN vu in erv..,.mnvrvn,. ndered. n,nrmrn, n MM�I er its ,u n no this bond om e ponies, and a ...... .1 .n no. ULIA 1.3. 0YEr,sSy ommencinq IIII e no o\vclvn rl Code, so nxrss ..r rvre .,e eESin ,.e NfamMaen E,,.FM, 11.1%i in any shit w ''''``,, tea, rmad, then 4U IJiB, _Overby it shall be N- u.o.es P -1,I) m..... ,......,.�. ., ...I :hange,_a. 6 23208 A STAIF, OF CALINRNTA �u COON IY OF ORr� L,_. ___Mary. F.lizalelblkctor _ N.111, 1,411.1.f _OLarge,__COUmv . mma5ulem �ali_ernia ,do Iwatr cernly IMl T., S: hLller Allornaymlag, M Ine NatgNl Fm In.m. Company of HIM. 011lt la\ Flal mho he q,..o Y-. no ma R, E ing wme pelts .". n I:MY ElIU9EiX AiC16A is sutwnteJ to Ine Iwegving ,meumem,..'I'd" lore me mn dl,„• 11 hNit < nwMu �iMn[I11, wIdu Rrpn. and ncno.',dq,d1.11..1M..1M and del..I,d Yid,n111uTlnl.W e t0�,64„ wI la u—u .1 11.1ol and on xnHf of Ine Nnmml Fn Imams Company of HarOwd, Iw lM um aM o Wd,on lf,Ien lm loam 0.uenf,.1h1 2 and nouwl of al my olbwmlM CnYal COStd Mena F wid CpunlY.lh,l 21st br of �.�, ..may,•! %47 ✓ �J Nou,r pump. RESOLUTION NO. - ii • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MEDIAN ISLAND CONSTRUCTION ON HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on June 17, 1981 by Daon Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Haven Avenue, between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard.. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Parcel Map No. 6206; and, WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient improvement security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City • of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said improvement security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk El Phillip 0. Schlosser, Mayor ri' G • • 0 CITY OP RANCHO CCCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 17, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krill, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Tract 10491, Bonds and Agreements �O C�Cn.17O�C7 ' n r r 1977 The subject map submitted by In= Homes was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on November 28, 1980 for the division of 5 acres into 20 single family lots. An agreement and bonds has been submitted by Inco Homes to guaran- tee the installation of off -site improvements including storm drain. A letter of approval has been received from The Cucamonga County Water District, Chaff. =y Union High School and Alta Loma School District. RECOMMENDATION It is reco.u. ended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign said map and forward it to the County Recorder. Respectfully submitted, L/ LBH: K:jaa Attachments • 9 E IN TYE L /TY 0/ Rd YL.vO C•JLJ NOY L/ L[Ld(1Mf(RIRrON:J IOTIrGM•P /Ln/ /•NIX( /. O� t C•LM.'Cl wP�Vf!(IP sY- OLrM�oJ b MR r //<ufafP w /pM L N J J* �fu nc. v frm imr iv waM+P fL6InOYM. Lnwn'I P. yn II wfwNJnowo.iurw Pn aJ.nd�.lu. y\` `Ihl i.l '42 I ki> Luv <;p-.j IL-�2p ' i,-i._i r1 i 2 ;t a I o i li I Q o' r OAf 18i 14 � � a i u• � -E-'- ' i' I �...... '� O... �..._. 1 G m �X CITRUS �R�/E RI tiI1c; o` CITY OP RANCI IO CUCA,NIONGA TR1l^ ENGINEERING DIVISION T — 1�1 VICINITY MAP r�F, Established 1885 BOARD OF TRUSTEES ROBERT S. FROST ROBERT W TANGF.SI.AN AIRS. NANCY K. KETTLE MRS. SANDRA A. OERLY JOHN C. BOOK Alta Loma School District 93SO. F Baseline Road Post Olrice 8o070 Rancho Cucamonga. Califnmia 91701. 714/987.O7f. JOHN E MCMUR SuPenn rcnCmt June 8, 1981 FLOYO M. STORK Date PosennrVSupport Servfres STACY NELSON H=5 Oi Services M1LLY STRAIN Cum"I.M /Spenal P.)'Cn, LETTER OF CERTIFICATION FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY Within Alta Loma School District and Alta Loma School District attendance boundaries for the following described project: Location /Description Tract 10491, corner of Ramona and Number of Dwelling Units 20 single family Anticipated Completion Date March 31, 1982 Gentlemen: • The Alta Loma School District hereby certifies that the capacity for twelve (12) students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy F. Greene Lease /Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocations Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 60 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 60 day period shall validate such commitment. Sincerely, -z Floyd M. Stork Administrator Personnel and Support Services cc: Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga • jh CHAEEEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT O311 (VEST FIFTH STREET, ONTARIO, EALIFOP',IG 91}6} n .•[ en „'•'•e ir. °1[S1 G 1-1. 111u1°1. °N °l SERVICES Ell". • Ju,1 8 1981 L<�Ctcr. of Cor tificalion of School District Ca;r,cit:v 11;thin the cla^•ffoy •joint Lln_i_o_n lfich School Di i.cr and the Alta Loma H. S. � tltt:c -i�.d.incc bou ntiar lcs for the iOliU::Lny doscnbcd prnlocl: Loc•,ti.on /Description: Tract 10491 Rancho Cucamonga Eastnind Homes/ Inco Development Corp Par. nor of Dr:cl.ti,nps: 20 AnLici.pated Completion Date: March 31, 1982 The school district herby certifies that thr capac:il,y foi: .15 x 20 = 3 students will be provided wi Lhin 24 r,,nnths of the cona,l r, L1 0n of the above u):ojeCt. This certification in givnn on the condition that the State of California con' f:.. fuirl LLIr provisions of the Leroy G. Grecne, ,.case /Pw) )iasc Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that t:1:c S[;at� 11loro L. ion Board may f,lnld a1L school huilding projects under its current rules and requlations without priority pein LS. The commitment of this capacity sha.l.l espir', 60 days from the dnto of I:his letter. Approval of the final im':p or the issuance of buildinq I,urmits: by thf, Ci Ly of R[1n Cho Cuca:nong,.l Within thoL GO -drly period shall. valid „LC such celmmitillicnt. ,( ...... -.; SL)prtun rin (111C ” . L'endenl. by Dianne Allen,_'1t0..u_�s�x_. -�.� cc: 1'lanni.nq Divi::ion Ci Ly of Ranch" Cuc lmonr;, 15,2. TRx`er3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA SURDIVISInN L'PROVE?IF.NT AGREIO, NT TRACT NO. KNOW ALE NEN fly THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered Iota, in ooforennee with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable ordinances of the City of Rancho Casamonge, Callforni,., A waLripal co[poratton, by and between said City, here - annfier referred to as the City, and EASTWIND TIMES, LTD. , hereinafter referred tw as the Subdivider. WQNESSETII: TWAT, WIII: op SEAS, said 5uhdivider desires to subdivide cr rtan real property in aid City As shown an the previously approved Tentative Map of Tract No, 10491 And. NIICRLAS, said Clty bas estabii.xhed certain requirements to be per by said Sub- divider as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of %aid Tract by said City: NON, 'DiE.tEFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Subivider as fat Iowa: 1. The Subdivider hereby agrees to construct at Subdivider's expense all im- provements described on Page 5 hereof within twenty -four months from the • date hereof. 2. This ngreprent shall run for a period of One (1) year from the data of the resolution of the Council of said City approving said Final Map and this aR reemenl. This aRraemant shall be in default on the day following Line Accord anniversary date of said approval unless no extension of time has bee+ granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 1. The Subdivider may request an extension of time to complete the terms here- of. Such request shall he suhmitted to the City in writing not less than ,weeks before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of citcumstnnrea necessitating the extension of tlme. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the con- struction .standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to require adJuscnents therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 4. If the Subdivider fails ar neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the ri Rht at any time to cause said previ- s to he met by any lawful me.rns, and there,mon recover from the Sub- divider and /or his surety the full cast and expense incurred. 5. 'file Subdivid,r .h.11l I'rav ids metevd waters wire to ea•h lot on said Tract in n card.mcr with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga em,oty water Distrlrt. b. Uttl itY'DC I•usit -Rte 4mmnt. Subdivider shall flit with the City Engineer, pr r to tlu os .. of .,f n wart to 1•e i'arinrmrd within the an•ss den - nlm,l 1'V 'd ^.q., , w, Itlon slat, +m•nt nihned by Sid' divider, and elell public uulil, rn rin''Ilien , vnleoA, to eba effect Ihnt Sul•diVider Illy made the .Icpn:ut 1. 1:1111 1. .p.i r. .l I.y 1... 1, puWi1 utility eorporatlnn for tine e - ,ian of .+ and ,III public utilities to be supplied by'such Corporaeteo with- in x1.11' suhdlvisinn. i. The Rnbdivldur shall In, n ^:Pnn.i bio for repl lcrmeut, felocatfun, or resale of a . ener l ue of ..IV I,rb;atinn water sy st rm In reafLi,t with construction Of rvgelred Impreve.evet, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water sy.a[em. RCE22A �+ 7 ��v 2TRMEMNI ACMEQ>ENT TMCT So. 10491 PAGE 2 • a. Iu9. env, rcu. I,9 n, red to be c nnirnr and .ahalI c,ofran to [he standard hl'au"', .Ill Stndanl 5penfft. I[L•nn of the City, .uul 1. the tmv[vve -,outs Plan .reproved by o d no file in the office of [be City T.npineer. Sold fml.rovomenta ore tl'oulated on [ho Construction and Rona Estimate, hereby n rt•orm ml nn 1'., ge i hereof. as taken from the fmprovemcnt plans listed thereon I., number. TI- Subdivider shall also Ia resoonsible for c natn¢ - tinn 0f a v t kit s it i oils or ether inc lden tai work beyond the tract bound- aries as needed for safety and Proper surface drainage. 9. Cnn,,,op,,Uo perm L'S shall be olltained by the Subdivider from the office of till City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon .shall be oher,od, v [ attartiun given to safety procedures, control of dust. noise, or othern nisarse tC the plot, nd a to proper notification of public utilities and City 1leptrtmentn. Failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. 10. Tho Subdivider .shall be rma,pr,bl. for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from lo,lic [166[5 of way within or adjoining said Tract resulting from development work relative to said Tract. 11. Work done within esisting streets shall be diligently pursued to completion. 12. Pa,kvav trees re9uired to be planted shall be planted by the Subdivider after other improvement work, Rradin B, and cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as provided by ordinance in accordance with the planting dia- gram approved by the City Community Development nlreetor in all locations .here th.• adprning lot bas been completely developed and built upon. RCE225 rt4 Tim Subdivider shall be r s - punsible for m iota Ming a11 trees planted in Rood health until the end of the 6,araplead maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever Is later. • 13. The Subdivider is responsible for meeting all conditions established by the City pursunnL to the Subdivision Hap Act, City ordinances, and this agtee- ment far the Tract, and for the maintenance or all impro ments constructed therunder Until the Tnut is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no improvement severity provided herewith shall be released before such accep- tance unless othetvise provided and authorized by the City Council of the Cily. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the mainteov¢e guarantee bond here- inafter described has been released by the City, or until a agreement together with the required improvement sorority has been submitted to the City by a ssor to the subdivider herein named, and by resolution of the City Council sere has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security therefor has been released. 15. Tim improvement s irity to Ire furnished By the Subdivider with this agree- ment shall ronsisc of the fallowing, and shall be aPpt."d by the City Attorney: A. A fa Ethfol P,fa,llope guarantee bend ..... ing completion by [be Suh- divider of all coedit tons prerm,uisite to acceptance of the Tract by ,lie City. B. A mitcrial and labor payment goarm,n•e band assuring payment in fail by the S,ib,ll, II, for all m trials, services, equipment rentals, aid labor fnfnisilad to the Subdivider in the course of creating the conditions of ,Ins mgr armn¢. C. A rash dvnustt with the City to f,irintce navmemt by tlo suhdivlder to the Lnn[ t �� a, s vuyor whose fU,,jrj,'.11d appears upan the Pin.lt Tnnrt Nw1 f," nmrcet[,, of all daft bmmdaq, lot co rneq and scree, rn tr rl m. n: „cuts and tar fotn La.h but c torlloe ale notes to the City, The aminint ,d o depn,Lt v be any nesinn, r ortiff,,d by the tract art - mr or , eve ,r is accfp[ahlr Payment in Intl, o , ff n value is sub - .itlyd, th, sM1 hnn,l slmlI Ile as shown on LhC Canotructinn and Bond 19 EaLimale contained herein. RCE225 rt4 lW'RDYL9E \T AGREEMENT TRACT .:0. 10491 pe %.ud nash III'pnsit may III, refunded an s s Prncedufe permits after tip[ by thu City of the c ul,tI,ne to nutes and written assurance or u,—go, in full from the tract enginaer nr s V. l'lu• required hoods non the principal amounts [hereof are vet forth 0n pace 4 of this agreement. ib. 'the c intunvmc guarantee bend !wreinnbove referred to shall be furnished by [he Subdi -dot to romancer any and all portions of all improvements free of Jefeccn of m. er is Leo crkmanshlp for a period of no Year from the J,Ite of d rcpoun'c of the Trace by the city, and shill be furnished +rfor w such racceptance and release of the above Jescribed improvement securit Y. Tbiaim Lnt enanco guarantee bond also specifically includes ell specified work of any parkway maintenance sOnessmant district that may be requirement of this Its", during the neriodof Lime for which the Sub- divider is required to provide such maintenance. Said melncomoure guarantee bond shall equal 52 of the construction esti- mate er $000.00. whichever is greater. V. That the Developer shell take out and .1.1.0, during the term of this dp tt•enant. simb public liability and Pmro rte damage insurance as shall protect him and ro Contractor or suuanitracr perform Log work covered ee by this agceent fro, claims for property damages which may crime because of the nature of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by said persons, even though such damages he not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any Contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public liability and property damage insurance shall also directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, life contractors and his subcontractors, and all Insurance policies issued hereunder shall s0 state. The amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: A. Cnn u'azto e'x liability insurance providing bodily injury or death lia bilit, limits of nnc less than $700,000 far, Iran), pcexon and $1,000,000 for each accident or curn.trours, and property damage liability limits Of not less than $100,000 for each accident er occurrence with an agg- regate limit of $200,000 for claims which may arise from the operations of the Devcloper in the performance of the work herein provided. B. Automobile liability i covering all vehicles used In the per- formance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits of not less than $100,000 for each person and $300,000 for each acci- dent o occurrence. and property damage liability limits of not less thin $50,,000r for each accident a occurrence, will an aggregate of not less than $100,000 which may arise free the operations of the Developer or his Comcraccor in performing the work provided for herein. 18. That before it,, parecti.d of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a c ertificate or ce-tificates of insurance covering the specified insuonncn. Each such certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding the anceliatlnns, n redaction in c rage of any policy evidences by swel, certificate. befits the expiration of thirty (30) days after the City shall lave received notification by registered mail from the insurance carrier. • RCE11C ✓� V h • !ID'RO@.MIF.NT AGREEMENT TRACT NO. 10491 PAGE 4 lm u : of umalr rstandi.r4 Ilrr: prm ixinnv cnniainrI 1""'o. and aE i eat v wngr l,Ir with "".I , the Subdlvidt" Fns — 1,1111trd the below described improve- ment security, and his affixed his si FOatnre hereto: FAITI!I'UL PERFORMANCE BONN Dasnnpt i on: Principal Amount; $160,000.00 Surely: OWClo1!BNAc /nf.MR a,w SON /dpY Attamvy-in -Fact: THe HJq 01-CAL[_ Address: P•n.Ac,C Y%o vPCAn� Cn 9Y7L� MATERIAL AND LAWS PAYMENT BOND Dcscriptior" Principal ,Amount -. $80,000.00 Barely: 4AP✓P1.o<.R9 /ApwR.Jnca 6DIWIJny At Carney -tn -east: 7HO1V'4 %/rte CC Addra,a: /00.4y SYn� (/P[.dne Gi. 9 1 7Srl CASH DEPOSIT V. NUHE4TINC BOND Amvmu stipulated by tract engineer or surveyor: Armaunt as shown on Construction and Bond Estimate: Amount deposited per Cash Receipt No. Data • MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND To be Posted prior to a cepcance of the tract by the City. Principal Amount: 141414 A of sa x A r A, 4 A A S . ♦ IN O(INESS HEREOF, the parties herd- have r sed these presents to be duly e. tad a d actnnwicdged with all Earmalities required by law on the daces t Enrtq p asita ibefr signatures. EASTWIND HOMES, LTD., A Calif. Partnersh 4 / By: INC f'OPMENT CORPORgTION, a Partner D.¢e '// 1 /_ by T} Ji o..i a.a/ subdivider Dew F/� ( by / �. sA A A Aea 411111 A11 A11A�A1e1 A 4A♦ • 4AAA AA A A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA * a municipal corporation 9) SaWEC0 ron nOTAsl moat oN arA4P In. r U. flCllt iF.AI NN C. Pc RN�S4 San 1711 111 In San Perna [Gino ss. 3 J RRII June 11, 1981 .. n.rrr.. m.. rn..r,n..... .I. ♦ lyrl.ri. .nr Inr .i.l Inran .nrl m ttranalh '.NI lowrOm -n-M-.r Ifi�W .,.; Ira. C. .Norris .r. .r,..,.e Alan J..Greenberg. I,- r.opmen ce re nl_1nc0 __ I rporatiot..un Development Corporation •.,tt ...... rn.r ,m. r.r.. I:e,or... ....r. . ,Mr "^e. Ir e IIS'Wlndr l!¢mes L[d, rrm. .._ ,_ ran .rr, .rr "rr, inn .. ur..l m , .n p.r wa Ir � rnAmrnn 9) SaWEC0 ron nOTAsl moat oN arA4P flCllt iF.AI NN C. Pc RN�S4 K NFC. ur rA '.NI lowrOm -n-M-.r Ifi�W CS TY Or RANCIIO CU MONCA • CONSTRUCTION AND BOND ESTIIMTE _ ENCROACHMENT PER:IIT FEE SCHEDULE (Attach tm "Inspectnr'S Copy ") DATE: Tyne 19RI PERMIT NO, COMPUTED BY C G NPK •.. I.: ..•i�t a..s. u...n ... ..:. File Role, c City Drawing No, 432 RUT[: Oo[5 not include current fee for writing pemic or pavement replace- ' - ant Eepos CONSTRUCTION COST ESTI:IATE fi,no 10 iTi,`I OVANTETY UNIT NIT f N:D:P:T TOM COFSTRUCTIOA COSTS L. 5 1G P,f.C, fn rl. - fl° f�. -e nr L.F. 90,000 I fr:N C.F. 6,119. L.F. (FEE SCHEDULE) f. Rer-.r (S3 CO m,nl :IOa]IENTATION BOND (USii) L.P. • 9i1-1 1.75 19,278 nn.rn 4 290 - z.to esae I" F.C.0 frn.5 1 1,500 S.F. a:• stP.c.F. Y. rer k«e "vve+ I C. Y. Innm [ca E ar`t rcf^5,rhrr it C.Y. Prr,.rrn, ico a,:e 35.540 S.F. .I 3 r'...,. ,�. Po.,. r.... .,,D •Ir•rk1 I 9.F. C. (r, nv +r In r TON ' r, MINI :n o 1'ILO tn c) L I I VII '.f (vndr- <n0 in 90) r n.I 670 TON 45,00 30,150 a r ndr., snn r•, Tnn I" Ilr.rl A.C. Mrrin :' S. F, nn, c r C. a. Wren ite r.. to 6 11V. F.A. 50.00 300 1 FA. 500.00 12,C,) �ir,n• 1 4 FA. 200.00 BOJ •CO .A. nr, rot 61NU '.!a .UU iot Rea. of RKeq. 1 2 EA. 1 500.00 1,000 0raln.riue Outlet Strur.tore I 1 1 2,500.00 ,>]J kI' Pa on qlwuj w 4' C.,tcn Ra51n 1 LA. ,ow 24 Cztc6 ea S,o EA. +I" r II Prr 17 L.F. 33" Storm Dra,n 402 L.F. 41; C.M.P. l Stan, Orvn OR J CONSTRUCTION COST 137,355 CONTINGMCY COSTS 22,645 TOM COFSTRUCTIOA COSTS 160,000 FAITHFUL rfm'CNCE BOND (100X) 160,000 I dkO`n At:[) MIERIAL BOND (SET) 90,000 ENClrt EERINC INSPECTION FEE 6,119. (FEE SCHEDULE) :IOa]IENTATION BOND (USii) 2,200 • • premium $2,800.00 Bond No, 102711 FAITHFUL PERFORAANCE BOND b'REREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and EASTNIND HOMES. LTD. (hereinafter designated a "principal'•] have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated 1 J/. /u 19 f!f and identified as project Tract 10491 is hereby refeaed eo and made a par[ hereo.; and, I.IHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and RFVFIOPFRf INSURANCE CO- ANY as surety, are held and rrnly�id unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "City "), in the penal sum of ONE HUN ORED SIMTY ANO NO /100 1HOU$RND Oo llars (SIbD 000 00 aw ul money of the Unite States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execu- tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. • The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, condi- tions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein spec- ified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. Asa part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be inclLded costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at- torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex- tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spec- ifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such chance, extension of time, alteration or add:.:.... .,. .n., co BF,Feeo I qli NOT:IPY SELL O,i 6iL M,• I�NMnil N'I LI Sr lr 4 va. �pA•NEs .J _751 1A 1— fii tP ft neI P SanflBe rd loo an rur San B Sr.. ,nl J ne 77, 1381 . m. .mnn, n..l. 1981 -o" .m r „.a� a i. ...n , ..n o-..,, n ..n. Inn ' .,,..nn .Ira C. tiorris _. .s.. ". m m... ' .:.. A._1 +...Ln, rml Alan J.-Greenberg,... -� a r ., ,• ,,Yke Presides Linn a Use 2 ar[.r fl t on i:nnn :..I:1 . .... e vr e.l.ra,r.fl m ..:In . [ m m • ."r M':nMrrl u�.:, . •"Dfln . n. ni n M1.!—fl.l, ^ n Eastwlnd Hmes l ... rmlpM1n ,b ,.m. .v.\ y I' .ur0 1 rnr.lipernw/.A�:b.nLm`•- , n_ {� -1UNVV L' _ , co BF,Feeo I qli NOT:IPY SELL O,i 6iL M,• I�NMnil N'I LI Sr lr 4 va. �pA•NEs .J _751 1A 1— fii Premium Included Bond No. 102711 • LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and FASTWIN O HOMES LTO (herei no f ter designated as "principal ") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete Cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated j.i rr 2f to 19�, and identified as pro- ject Tract 10491 I. hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, under the Germs of said agreement, principal is re- quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City Of Rancho Cuca- monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 13 ( commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material - men and other persons employed in the performance. of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of EIGHT( THOUSAND AND NO 1100 DOLLARS 001 lets for material: urnrs ea or labor thereon of any kind, of for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upor. this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at- tor-ey's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such oblige tic n, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex- tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said - uemrnt oI the specifications accompanying the some shall in any mannor affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here- by waive notice of env such change, extension, alteration or ad- P frT(ni rah 1x11, .TI 'IF San Bernardino— I'll Jun a 11, 1391 .. _ _. i,r ", ,n, _,_._.j. ri .rr•• ^J -.Ira C. Norris Ala_ en a ✓ n. x __r•f.�d, Pre Alan ,...Green her9� t" "•. o OMentce President,...,, "r_lnw. .. ._. e Development Ca rporatlon a„ .,imp, :en "..1,u"':r ,Eastwind Nomes Ltd. "•,,,�e "Je iImm..,. .I,n- Ls:1.6e,..i Iloll I °V[ Sxcco men Norser sup on arnwe o«t 1Cµ PAseat LYNN C. RNEB N III-- (inn Q,wx_�\ 1 W V RESOLUTION NO. • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C;;CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 10491 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 10491, consisting of 20 lots, submitted by Inco Homes Subdivider, located on the southwest corner of Victoria Street and Ramona Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of • said City, the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and, 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and, 3, That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip U. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk / n �P V 0 • CITY OF RANCFIO CL'CA:�IO \G1 STArr REPORT DATE: June 17, 1981 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician GAO C,CC.1.411} CIS C, o LI Y SUBJECT: Acceptance of Tract Map 11428 Bonds and Agreement 1977 The subject map submitted by Data Design Lahoratories /Haven Invest- ments was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on April 9, 1980 for the division of 38 acres into fourteen (14) industrial lots located north of Foothill Blvd. between Haven and Center Ave- nues. Haven Investments has submitted an agreement and bonds to guarantee the installation of off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance $70,000.00 Labor and Material $35,000.00 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign said map and for- ward it to the County Recorder. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BK:jaa Attachments 0 • 0 —. ..... �,. , y, `r.._.�� ad J•I:: .cam ;��,, ,. ,�;, rl, . 4 i lip CITY OP RA \CI10 CI C: \,\ titl:` 10 \CA Tract ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY \I, \P // ,,, T — RESOLUTION NO. S1- If • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 11428 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 11428, consisting of 14 lots, submitted by Data Design Laboratories /Haven Investments Subdivider, located on the north side of Foothill, between Haven and Center Avenues has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved • and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City, the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and, 10 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and, 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor rff 0 • 0 CITY OP RANCI -10 CUCA,'vIQ \'GA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 17, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Consent Calendar, Release of Bonds Tract 8884 - Located on the east and south sides of Red Hill Country Club Drive OWNER: Harnish- Morgan - Causey 500 East "E" Street Ontario, California 91764 Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $134,000 The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept the roads and authorize the City Engineerto file a Notice of Completion. 0 P RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cuca:.wnga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Tract No. 8884 • 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 -C Baseline Road, Post Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 17th day of June 1981, there was com- pleted on the hereinafter described real property the work of in- provement set forth in the contract documents for Tract No. 8884, Street Improvements 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of im- provement as a whole was Harnish- Morgan-Causey, Inc. 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Tract No. 8884 The street address of said property is: N/A DATED: , 19 . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, owner • BY: (Na nel (Title 6 V -I- E • A CITY OF RANCHO CLICAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 12, 1981 TO: City Council FROM: Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Meet -and Confer Procedures /Mobilehome Parks GL�CA.1�p^ r1 _C ��. C i S � r O - o F z U 1977 At the time the agenda was being assembled, Ordinance No. 148 establishing the Meet - and - Confer Procedures for mobilehome park owner and coach owners had not been received from the City Attorney. Once this has been received, we will notify you. 4 ORDINANCE NO. ) 4-7 I� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 17.04, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SECTION 17.04.080, TO ELIMINATE THE TRI- ANNUAL REVIEW PERIODS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains the following: SECTION 1: Chapter 17.04, Section 17.04.080 of the Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 17.040.080 Review and rocessin rocedures for residential development. A. Estabiishment o a residential assessment system. 1. A residential assessment system adopted by the council shall establish five basic categories and each category shall be assigned a maximum total points which will then be divided into sub - categories for rating purposes. The five basic categories are: public services, design quality, affordable housing, planned communities and planned unit developments, and orderly development. 2. Applications for total development shall be rated by the growth management committee for (1) public services, (2) affordable housing, (3) planned communities and planned unit developments (PUD) and (4) orderly development, and by the design review committee for design quality. 3. Applications for custom lot /tract subdivisions shall be rated by the growth management committee for (1) public services, (2) site orientation and street design and (3) orderly development. 4. After rating, if the project meets or exceeds the threshold point limit, the subdivision will proceed to the planning commission for review and action. For those custom lot subdivisions that are proposed to be built as a whole or total project and for tract subdivisions that have received planning commission approval, reapplication under total development, Section 1, Resolution No. 79 -74, a copy of which shall be on file in the office of the city clerk, shall be required as a condition of approval to be satisfied prior to approval and recordation of final map. 5. Projects shall be evaluated under the residential assessment system by the community development director. Applications may be filed with the Planning Division. Complete applications will be accepted for processing. 6. A threshold point limit shall be established by the city council as part of the residential assessment system. This threshold point limit shall constitute the minimum number of points a project is required to achieve if it is to be given consideration for approval by the planning commission. 7. Those tentative tract applications that were previously filed under the county but not approved by the county planning commission shall not proceed with processing or filing until Review Period 1 as stated above. Page 2 8. 'Within five days after the point rating determination, the community development director shall cause a written notice to be nailed (certified) to the applicant stating the point rating for his residential development project and whether his application has received the required threshold point limit for further consideration by the planning commission. B. Appeal of Ratings. 1. Ratings of applications by the growth management committee and /or the design review committee may be appealed to the plannina commission by an aggrieved person or body, public or private, within fourteen days after the day of decision. 2. The decision of the planning commission of any such appeal may be appealed to the city council by any aggrieved party in the same manner and time limitations as are set forth for the filing of an appeal with the planning commission. The decision of the city council shall be final. (Ord. 86 S6, 1979). PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of June, 1981 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor • ATTEST: Lauren 11. Wasserman, City Clerk `l� • • CITY OF RANCHO CLICANIONGA STAFF RXPORT DATE: June 17, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - 81 -01 - TRAILS ELEMENT revision to the adopted trails Element of the General Plan of Rancho Cucamonga ABSTRACT: Attached to this report, please find a copy of the May 13 Planning Commission report on the revision to the Trails Element of the General Plan. Included in the Planning Commission report are the Element revisions and the Resolution adopted by the Planning Commission relative to design standards for Trails. The Planning Commission recommends ap- proval to the City Council of the revision to the Trails Element and adoption of the design standards for trails. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission reviewed the attached report making only one Change to the Trails Element. On page two of the Trails Element, the phrase "community trails that extend southerly of the shaded area on Figure III -S -A should not be required to provide for equestrian usage except in areas where continuity of the system is needed" was added to the first paragraph. The Commission revised the Resolution by changing the Demens Channel to a regional trail on Figure III -5 and changed exhibit A, local feeder trail, from 10 feet to fifteen feet. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the revision to the Trails Element of the General Plan of Rancho Cucamonga and; adopt the attached Resolution establishing design standards for Trails. Respectfully submitted, BARRY K. HOGAN City Planner BKH: j k Attach. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -52 �• A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED MASTER PLANNED TRAILS ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1981 GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City has adopted the Master Plan of Tracts of the General Plan and this Proposed General Plan Amendmant provides for an amendment of said element; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing to consider this amendment to the Master Plan of Trails of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, comments were heard and considered both pro and can regarding the requested General Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends that a Negative Declaration be issued for GPA 81 -01; and NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council amendment to the Master Plan of Trails as attached an Exhibit "A" and contained in the Public Facilities portion of the Land Use and Development Super Element. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Richard Dahl, Cha lmnan J�/f ATTEST:i'.'.i'�/ Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK, LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonna, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: (� AYES: COMMISSIONERS: King, Rempel, Tolstoy, Dahl l NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka 76 RIDING, HIKING, BICYCLING TRAILS Opportunities exist within Rancho Cucamonga for the provision of trails for transport and recreation usage. Horseback riding, hiking, jogging, running, walking and bicycling can all be accommodated in some way within Rancho Cucamonga. One of the secondary benefits of the many flood control channels lacing through the City is the availability of right -of -way for trail purpose. These rights -of -way were once part of the San Bernardino County Recreation Plan, providing for multi - purpose usage; i.e. bicycles, hiking, and equestrian. In Northern Alta Loma residential development has provided for equestrian use. However, there were no consistent design standards employed resulting in inadequate trail systems, and a fragmented collection of easements within various tract develop- ments; the majority of which lack standard trail widths, uniform design, and develop- ment. Many trails empty into the street or dead -end at walls, fences, ravines, or flood control channels. • The Trails Plan deals with two areas; the resolution of existing trail problem areas within developed residential areas; and, a consistent policy for a trail system for new development where appropriate. Trail Concept The objective of the trail system is to delineate an overall network of interconnect- ing trails which are integrated with recreation areas, parks, open spaces, residential and commercial and industrial areas. The overall trail concept is based upon three components: Regional Multi- purpose trails Community trails Local Feeder trails The Regional Multi- purpose Trails are the backbone of the system. They are reserved, extended long distance corriddrs, and serve as the main connectors to the regional parks, scenic canyons, the national forest,• other major open spaces, residential, Commercial and industrial areas. -- - -- - -. -_. . .. 7/ The Community Trails provides the user with access to the Regional Multi- purpose Trails to comunity facilities such as Heritage Park, Alta Loma Park, Base Line • Park, Elementary, Junior and Senior High Schools, Shopping Centers and the Regional Shopping Center. Community Trails extend through the community along water ways, utility corridors, public rights -of -way, easements, and along streets having adequate parkway width. These trails form loops of varying length and act as the initial link in unifying the existing disjointed Local Feeder Trails. Local Feeder trails, not identified on the map, are contained within subdivisions and enable the user access from their residential lot to the Community or Regional Multi- purpose Trail, residential neighborhoods, schools, and parks. Emphasis should be placed on establishing appropriate Local Feeder Trails at the time of subdivision approval or development review. OBJECTIVE The objective below and subsequent policie in conjunction with those expressed in the • �, circulation sub- element, shall be used to develop the Trail System. Provide an interconnected system of riding, bicycling and hiking trails which: - Have safe access and travel to neighborhood, city, regional parks; recreational facilities, scenic areas, residential, commercial and industrial areas; - are aesthetically pleasing and create a "country and rural atmosphere" by integrating natural areas and urban areas with well planned linear open spaces. POLICIES o That the area as shown on Figure III - Sa provide for; The keeping and protection of animals on private property, in- cluding equine, bovine, cleft - hoofed animals, and poultry. 0 Figure III -5a EQUESTRIAN /RURAL AREA DESIGNATION 0 -.._ .. - ....... -... 73, • J '•I 71oF - Require that all development within the area relate to exis ing and future areas occupied by equine, bovine, cleft - hoofed animals and poultry by providing trail connections through easements in order to connect disconnected trails and for needed access to recreation activities. - That all trail easements shall be maintained through an active program of weed abatement in a neat and orderly manner on all developments. o The City should promote programs for improving existing trails such as removing existing barriers on trail systems to make the trails safer, more functional, and accessible to adjacent trails. o The City shall establish a master trail system which provides for: Regional Multi- Purpose Trails which connect to regional recreation areas, residential, commercial and indust� 1 areas. - Community Trails which connect resi- dential areas, local activity centers, and the regional shopping center and the Regional Multi- Purpose Trail System. - Local Feeder Trails which connect individual residential lots to the Community and Regional Trail System. o The City shall facilitate the development of a Regional Malti- Purpose Trail System as shot-in on figure III -5. All segments of the regional Multi - Purpose trail system, shall be available for use as equestrian, pedestrian and bike trails where feasible. o The City shall establish an agreement with San Bernardino County for the use and maintenance of the Flood Control Rights -of -Way for the Trails. o The City shall establiWan agreement with public and private utilities for the use and maintenance of utility corridors and Rights -of -Way for trail purposes. 7U • -7-z� o All new development shall be developed in accordance with the Master Plan of Trails and adopted City Design Standards. o Trails shall be maintained on natural • surfaces and located along natural, physical features where ever possible. "•LL ..t'.j, tJ� o The City shall establish a liason committee including members from the lf local riding club, the Planning Commission, the City Council, the City Staff and other members at large to review all residential projects in the City for trail usage. o Any new development should consider prior existing bicycling, pedestrian and equestrian access and traditional travel routes through the property. o Hon- residential development should consider use of amenities, for equestrian, pedestrian and bicycling activities such as hitching posts, benches, rest areas, drinking fountains and bike stands. o Whenever possible, along Community Trails, street trees and landscaping • should be included into the design r" adjoining the trails. The pallet of trees should conform to street tree standards but be low maintenance and drought tolerant. o The City shall consider a program for the maintenance, and where necessary, construction and rehabilitation, of Community Trails. o Whenever possible and feasible, the City shall require that all residential lots in the equestrian rural area have Local Feeder Trails on the rear of the lot. • -7-z� C6 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -53 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN OF REGIONAL MULTI- PURPOSE, COMMUNITY AND LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to establish standards for the design of trails within the City, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and recommended the Trails Element for approval by the City Council, and; WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to have trails provided along natural physical features where possible. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby establish the following DESIGN STANDARDS FOR TRAILS: SECTION 1: Trail Width: (in feet) Regional Multi- purpose Trails 30' Community Trails 20' Local Feeder Trails 15' On Street /Off Street Bike Trails 5' (See,Exhibit A) Clearance: 10' overhead with brush and weeds, debris and rocks removed from trail tread. In instances where topography, right -of -way configuration grading or existing vegetation make it infeasible to construct full width trails as listed above, the City Planner may grant relief and reduce said requirements. C IL /oN�G MUGT /- PURPI7SE 'Ti"AIL COMMUNITY TRAIL Zol J/ ,1 7 • • LOCAL F40,59 TRAIL • -7/ Page 2 C• i SECTION 2: Design Requirements: a. For equestrian usage the following requirements shall be met: 1. Vertical Grade: 0 -5% optimum 10% maximum for distances over 500' 15% maximum for distances limited to 500' 20% permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' 2. Cross Section: 3. Drainaoe: 4. Side Slope Cuts and Fill: 1 -4% optimum 6% maximum in approved locations only Avoid erosion by proper grading. Where necessary, use diversionary devices such as water bars and berms. 2:1 maximum 5. Surfacing: Native soil, decomposed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Removal of rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. b. For bicycle usage the following requirements shall be met: 1. Vertical Grade: 0 -5% optimum 101 maximum for distances limited to 200' 2. Cross Section: 2% maximum 3. Surfacing: 3" asphaltic concrete or 4" portland concrete cement 4. Design Speed: 11 MPH average, 7 -15 MPH 5. Curvature: 15 MPH maximum SECTION 3: Fencing a. For Re ional Multi- Purpose Trails: Along Flood Channels fencing shall consist of a 6' chainlink fence installed by the Flood Control District, Corps of Engineers or the City of Rancho Cucamonga atop the flood control channel wall. The adjacent developer shall be re- sponsible for the installation of a 6' high chainlink fence installed at the joint property line for the length of the co- terminus boundary, Openings shall be made for access at approved points and for where local Feeder Trails and Community Trails intersect. 7F Page 3 C b. For Community Trails: Fencing along street trails (i.e. parkways shall consist of V-5- high two -rail white • extruded concrete fence installed along the ultimate right -of -way line for the street, where there are no existing block walls; otherwise fencing shall be located at curb line. Openings shall be provided where Local Feeder Trails or Regional Multi- Purpose Trails intersect. For trails not along streets, no fencing shall be required. C. Local Feeder Trails: Fencing shall consist of one rail, 4' high' wood splitsplit rail fencing, installed along the co- terminus boundary of the easement and the non - easement property of the tract or lot. SECTION 4: Trail Entrance: Trail entrances shall be designed To provide for equestrian, bicycling and hiking use and discourage motor vehicle access (See Exhibit B), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unobstructed vehicular access for service vehicles. SECTION 5: Bicycling Trail requirements shall be as shown below: j Pwkea Car Bt,,Ywe MDbr Vence I OPeratrg Ccerang uj I B'or 10' i S i 10'Dr II' I TYPE I SHARED BIKEWAY 1 I I I B¢YCIe j M.11.1 Venice I TYPE II SHARED BIKEWAY el Operating opera ng �I u 10 on r I I I TYPE III PESTNICTEB BIKEWAY I I PakEn Cm °n ti t m l r Bc c' Ope m;�n0 I - I_ Mow, vn�cc v Opormmg � Ar '" I � I Ir„ I • • l i IRAI i f RAIL 1RAIL- M47-RIAL5: "LPCwD •,e , &ALMINRE PIGS u eu k V"L Q o- 1 -ara3 'AV WEIR X\l o PIS kib f !� h ri\ g��\ \15 1 7 .. �'II RgaB�Ma w..e.1t m.rn. +re�.oatR. eiOG'(. WNL Q (P FDLE Gr�Oy`x.°a .�ir.E,1 - FAIL PnND 1T°...✓ VECHICLE BARRIERS DESIGN ALTERNATIVES tai dg gIOlT e l � ( 1 /Il�ff(1CKKk yXK KXVIC��,p�q[YXYKYY Yyy '�/�I • G4MU woK II 11 to Ww 1. hares WrW Sror ACZc ss IWA41" I7CKXx K KK KK7C/KK XyK K YKYX y U+nr u uulL /eorsor. L"K— IG'Met'A�6�0. -y 14" Mr[aM 'r CxtfES "1e2.: 4c7sr- B+t< rs 4r.ry¢o is swru4 • l axm ��m Q -G w Page 4 ib a. Shared Bikeways: The shared bikeway has no barrier, to delineate the roadway for either symbolic or physical, bicycles. The bikeway is identified by signs posted along the side of the roadway or by pavement markings painted on the roadway. The outside traffic lane becomes the width required for motor vehicle travel, usually 10 or 11 feet, plus the 5 -foot bikeway. Bicycle -flow is always the same direction as motor - vehicle -flow, since this is much safer. Shared bikeways can be developed in conjunction with pedestrian traffic. However, this practice is discouraged, since pedestrian -flow and bicycle - flow are not very compatible. b. Restricted Bikeway: It is clearly delineated by a barrier and signing. Adequate delineation is an essential re- quirement for the development of a restricted bikeway. Barriers are symbols, such as those made with paint on a pavement. Symbol barriers include striping, full -width coloring and reflectorized raised pavement markers. C. Minimum Criteria For Shared & Restricted Bikeways: The following criteria shall be considered: (• 1. Average daily traffic (motor vehicle) 2. Bicycle volume 3. Posted speed limit 4. Truck Traffic 5. Adequate right -of -way 6. Safety SECTION 6: Flood and Drainage Channel Crossings: Where Community Trai s cross existing or proposed drainage channels the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. SECTION 7: Si nin : Signing is required to let the user and the public know where the trails are.. a. Equestrian: `+ O 1�a IUL1011 i10. Page 5 b. Hiking: Pedestrian: c. Bike: • • Page 6 e. Informational: j'` � NQ BEGIN ' MOTOR RIGHTiU�RHLANE VEHICLES YIELD i0 BIKES USE YIELD PED TO SIGNAL PEDS H LA0N> E � I I{ EEp C AHEAD ONLY I PARHIN6 •^ BIKE LAME BI SE SECTION 8: Street Crossings: Shall be at grade with appropriate ( street stripping and signing. In cases of equestrian usage, • texturized paving is desirable. SECTION 9: Waivers: The Planning Commission may grant a waiver from the requirements of this Resolution except Section 1 when: (a) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Resolution. (b) There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to other properties. (c) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. (d) The granting of the waiver will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. (e) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the • public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Any request for waiver shall be presented in writing and be made as part of the development application for the project which involves the trail. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Afl ichard Dahl, Chairman 1 I ATTEST: J r L�(/ �_��✓' Secretary of the Planning Commission is RESOLUTION NO. '211 -'?Z' • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING THE ADOPTED TRAILS ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN. WHEREAS, there has been demonstrated a need for revision to the adopted Trails Element of the 1981 Rancho Cucamonga General Plan; and WHEREAS, members of the public have participated in the review of the revised Trails Element of the General Plan; and . WHEREAS, the Equestrian Committee of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed the Trails Element revisions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council have held duly advertised public hearings to obtain comments, both pro and con, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby amend the 1981 Trails Element of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan in its entirety to read as is depicted in the attached Exhibit "A ". PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1981. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. 'Wasserman, City Clerk 0 C � Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 81 -yJ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN OF REGIONAL MULTI - PURPOSE, COMMUNITY AND LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to establish standards for the design of trails within the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and adopted a similar Resolution establishing standards for the design of Regional Multi- Purpose, Community and Local Feeder Trails within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, it is the City Council's desire to establish these same standards by City Council Resolution for the development of trails within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby establish the following design standards as attached Exhibit "A" for trails. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1981 • AYES: 9 NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren 11. Wasserman, City C erk Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor • IE CITY OF RAWHO CIXAN1Ck rA STAFF REPORT C O F U a > 1977 ) DATE: June 17, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -01 - ACACI - A change of zone ram R -3 Multip a Family Residential} to R -PD (Multiple Family /Planned Development) for the devel- opment of a planned condominium complex consisting 0 f 84 dwelling units on 9.6 acres of land located approximately on the southwest corner of Baker Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 207 - 191 -31 & 40 Related File: Tentative Tract No. 10762 ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of May 13, 1981, held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above- described project. Upon completion of the hearing, the Planning Commission voted 4 -0 to re- commend approval of a change of zone from R -3 to R -3 -PD for the above - described property. Please find attached a copy of the Planning Com- mission Staff Report of May 13, 1981, which fully describes the project. The project as proposed is consistent with all related City Ordinances and the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac). The project proposes a density of 8.75 units per acre. Also attached to the Planning Commission Staff Report is the Planning Commission Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 10762 and Con- ditions of Approval for development of that tract, which is contingent upon approval of the planned development designation by the City Council. During the course of the public hearing by the Planning Commission, no objections were voiced from surrounding property owners or concerned citizens. Planning Commission Resolution No. 81 -55 is attached for your review and consideration which recommends approval of this change of zone and issuance of a negative declaration. RECOMMENCATION: The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council' approve Planned Development Zone Designation No. 80 -01 for the above- described project through the adoption of the attached Ordinance. Respectfully submitted, BARRY K. HOGAN City Planner 8KH:1.1V:jr 'GS_ c <. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -55 • A RESOLUTION Of THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CCm"4ISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT R -3 TO R1 U 3 /PD FOR CHANGE IN EON THE WEST M WEST SIDE OF BAKER AVENUE, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. APN 107- 191 -31 and 40 WHEREAS, on the 29th day of December, 1980, an application was filed and accepted on the above described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of May, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and • 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the existing and proposed General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Plannirg Commfssion has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on May 13, 1981. NO'd, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 13th day of May, 1981, Planned Development No. 80 -01. 2, The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 80 -01. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 10762 shall apply to this Planned Development.: x Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Richard Dahl, Chaii an I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Tolstoy, King, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka • q0 • ' ice-- - - CITY OF RANCHO CUCr.. ;CNGA jSTAFF REPORT • 9 DATE; May 13, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner SUBJECT: P.D. 80 -01 - TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 10762 - ACACIA CONSTRUCTION - A Planned Development of 84 condominiums on 9.6 acres of and zoned for R -3, located at the southwest corner of Baker Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, APN 207- 191 -31 and 40. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting approval of 84 condominium units to be located just south of the immediate corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue. The proposed project meets the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements, and has passed the City's Growth Management and Design Review process. Consequently, approval of the Planned Development, the Tentative Map, and associated Negative Declaration is recommended. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval of an 84 unit condominium project to be located on 9.6 acres of land immediately south of the southwest corner of Baker Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (Exhibit "A "). The property is relatively level, and is currently in use as a citrus orchard. A Bluegum eucalyptus windrow abuts the project site along the northerly boundary. The proposal has been reviewed as a total development package by the Growth Management and Design Review Committees in accordance with Growth Management Ordinance, and received a point rating in excess of the required minimum. The conceptual grading plan has also been reviewed by the Grading Committee and received approval in concept only. ANALYSIS: The project, as proposed and shown on the attached Exhibits "B" and TC is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of medium density residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre), as well as with the provisions of the Planned Development Ordinance. The surrounding land uses and zoning are described as follows: � ITEM I I Staff Report May 13, 1931 Page 2 LAND USE ZONING Site Citrus Grove R -3 North S.P. Railroad, Commercial Single Family Residence C -2 East vacant Single Family Residence Mobile Home Park R -3 South vacant Single Family Residential R -3 West vacant Single Family Residential R -3, R -1 The proposed project would consist of 84 condominium units arranged in building clusters of 2 -6 dwellings per building. Dwelling types include one and two- • story units, 2 and 3 bedroom, all with private, fenced rear patios and attached double car garages. In addition to private patio areas, a common recreation center is also provided. Common facilities include a swimming pool, spa, cabana, and a tot lot (Exhibit "D "). Vehicular access into the project is provided at two points on Baker Avenue. A private drive loop system provides access to all dwellings within the project. Pedestrian circulation is accommodated by a series of four -foot wide walks located on at least one side of all drives. Most units have 20' long garage aprons to accommodate overflow parking. In addition, 40 guest parking spaces are also shown on the plan. The total amount of parking provided exceeds City standards. As a condition of approval, Staff is requesting the elimination of 9 parking spaces in order to provide additional open space and landscaping in two critical areas (Exhibit "B "). In addition, it is also recommended that buildinq 7 be moved northerly about 15' in order to expand the common recreational area. As a result of this review process, the applicant was requested to prepare a traffic study to address the impact of the proposed project on the intersection of Baker Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Such a study was prepared by the applicant's Engineer, and its conclusions indicate that the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection is not warranted by the projected traffic increase that may be'generated by this development. (See the attached City Engineer's memo). • OC, C • Staff Report May 13, 1931 Page 3 The City Engineer's office indicates that the project site does not depend on the existing open channel located to the west of the project for drainage. The site currently drains, and will continue to drain into Baker Avenue. The attached conditions of approval would require the Developer to provide certain I mprovements in Baker Avenue to accommodate such runoff. In addition, a storm drain along the westernmost tract boundary and a flood protection wall along the entire west boundary will be required of this developer. During the Design Review stages, the applicant was requested by the Committee to r.,ndify the design of the fencing along Baker Avenue to include masonry pilasters or other permanent features rather than grape -stake fencing as originally proposed. The fence design has since been modified to solid, all - wood construction, which the applicant feels is more compatible with the design of the overall project. After review of more detailed drawings (Exhibit "E "), Staff concurs with the applicant and recommends that the fence design be approved as submitted. The Design Review Committee also requested that provisions for garden equipment storage be designed into all units whose patios have no direct access to the common open areas. Due to the layout of the • dwellings, such storage facilities cannot be integrated into the design of the building without substantial modifications of the floor plans. As a result, the applicant is proposing that garden equipment storage sheds be incorporated in the rear yard fence design (Exhibit "F "). The Commission may wish to consider approval of these storage sheds as proposed by the applicant, if it is felt that such storage sheds are necessary. The attached Resolution of approval includes a condition which would enable the Staff and the applicant to resolve the precise location and design of the structures prior to the issuance of building permits. rJ The project site is located within a designated special studies zone, the Red Hill Fault Zone. As required, a report prepared by a certified Engineering Geologist has been submitted to the City. The results of the report indicate that no topographical evidence of active faulting was observed during the subsurface trench explorations. Consequently, the report concludes that ground rupture within the site associated with faulting is not considered likely during the life of the development. However, the report does recommend that seismic design criteria be utilized for the design of the structures, as outlined in the most current addition of the Uniform Building Code. C 7 Staff Report May 13, 1981 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that that the Commission review the proposed oroject and the attached Exhibits, and that a public hearing be conducted. If, after such review and hearing, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions as recommended by Staff, adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval for both Tentative Tract No. 10762 and P.D. 80 -01 would be in order. Respectfully submitted, Barry K. Hogan City Planner BKfi:OK: kp Attachments: City Engineer's report Exhibit "A" - Vicinity and Tract Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit "0" - Recreational Center Exhibit "E" - Baker Avenue /Details Exhibit "F" - Garden Equipment Storage /Details Exhibit "G" - Perspectives - Typical Exhibit "N" - Duplex /Elevations Exhibit "I" - Elevations Exhibit "J" - Floor Plans Exhibit "K" - Floor Plans Exhibit "L" = Drainage Pattern Initial Study, Part I Conditions of Approval Resolutions of Approval 0 • • 0 7 I ( C (-,mv nc'o n v� � rn aarnne STAFF REPORT DATE: May 13, 1981 TO: Barry Hogan, City Planner FROM: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Traffic Study for Tentative Tract No. 10762 As was requested of the developer for the subject tract, a study prepared by Mohle, Perry 8 Associates of Fullerton, analyzing traffic impact at the inter- section of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue due to the proposed development was received by us. The study focused on the possible need for a traffic sig- nal at the intersection. It concludes that that signalization of the intersec- tion will not be warranted due to the traffic to be generated by the proposed development and we concur with this finding. However, based on the study, it is our opinion that widening of Baker Avenue at the intersection with Foothill is needed for uninterrupted floe of traffic as well as to avoid conflicts in turning movements in and out of Foothill Boule- vard. Necessary conditions in this regard have been incorporated in the "Condi- tions of Approval" for the subject tract. PAR:jaa q_� a -- A INORTIA CITY 01' ITEM, —Ir RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: VlCnJX117� r ' A'E: N -;r S PLANNING DIVISION ENI 1111IT'A " SC : • I F� • A NORTH' CITY Or ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE; SITE I PLANNING DIVISION SCALE; • • 9 C � CITY OF Ure,\I: /o76Z RANCHO CUCA.MONGA TITLE: �O✓dL GPI' PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: q9 z O F a > w J � W W w> V a z W W u Y: J 6 Q 0 V 6 F Ow F� V � f0 Q Q Y, U Y Y Q Y III t aff CITY OF ITC.. \1: I�� RANCHO CLCAMO\GA TITLE:- -PAke- 4-k- - uE;rd ,`s � PLANNING DIVISION EN11113IT: _SCAI_L'- 47.'S. 7 M z J q �}CO ±'} q0 YS � \• 11 JiC r a z O F a > w J � W W w> V a z W W u Y: J 6 Q 0 V 6 F Ow F� V � f0 Q Q Y, U Y Y Q Y III t aff CITY OF ITC.. \1: I�� RANCHO CLCAMO\GA TITLE:- -PAke- 4-k- - uE;rd ,`s � PLANNING DIVISION EN11113IT: _SCAI_L'- 47.'S. 7 M goFzN 1 STORAGE lJN9i CITY OF ITEM: I III RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLr PLANNI \G DIVISION C•XI IIIIIT:— SCALD: 14 r MS 2W A TO r- A G� o AA i I IXl b1nw c i I �I i I� � � � I I i; 2XG ?� ✓..C�! C; • (� III': -=,� �II� �•. -,, �'Ihr � •'�� '�'�� _�_' IIIIII a �;° N i•�� '"jl71`r LII�I i��'�;��' I I � � V goFzN 1 STORAGE lJN9i CITY OF ITEM: I III RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLr PLANNI \G DIVISION C•XI IIIIIT:— SCALD: 14 r CITY OP m:.�I: _ - 77-/a74,a' RANCHO CUCAINIOmYA TITI.E: PLANNING DIVISION ENIIIGIT�_ G�^�SCALE �'�_ �j 2 IF. I a —ma 1, am, I CITY OF RANCI-K) CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION' ITEM: TiTLD EXI 1111,17/S'CALE; c CI,Fy 01, heal: RANCI-10 CUC. MONG;1 rirLr•.: � �� - -� �--- PLANNING DIVISION euunir "SCALE: S )ay • J 9 C C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO GA PLANNING DIVISION ITE \I TITLE .E\IIIIIIT SCALE w C C ..._ • II r 2 G� 1 al- 1 I �- 1 �• 1 1 �r I . I I L------------ CI''y 01- ITEM: -IF /07GZ 1 .1 \CI-IO CUC\NIONG.A TITLE PLANNING DIVISION- EXIIICIT: '/ �SCALL i Y i ;II a { j :1 _£ w c c • 4� vi %' z 720 O/L �R000afiq 5ipgn_D.;?kf -- .. - ..'sue,;' j. 20 1 � sox fA PRo DOs£O CATaN$ASIM fa TI EX.JJ. ez� ppe ' - rs /tJ iobb %oiasomj/;,!F 6... ..,. ... .. 77 nfieoa' CITY OF ITf\1 RANCHO CUCAMO Gr1 TITI -I;: = GPiicfsn� fir%!+ PLANNING DIVISION ��Illrlr. '`' SCALE:- )a7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (If'.) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Co.. —ittee wz -11 make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact: and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. • PROJECT TITLE: Rancho Villas _ APPLICAN°T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Acacia Construction, Inc. 270 Laguna Road, Suite100. Fi,l larjpp,�,A, �,j'y'{.ri_(7.]9.J_99� -pang NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: _James Staver LOCATION OF PROf�ECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) SW Corner of Foothill arsd Baker APN 201- 191 -31 R 40 _ LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Standard subdivision approvals and building permits SO D • PROJECT DESCRIPTION l I r1 �J DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 84 unit condominium project on 9.6 ACREAGE OF PROJECT 'AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 9.6 acres - 84 condominiums with average size of 1315 sn. ft_ DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE I1\'CLI;DING 110ORDfATiOA ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): V n use as citrus residential, commercial, mobile home Park. vacant landdnd_S- 2JLB__ _ Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? 1� Z WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? _)L__ __ 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 1(_ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: (dPrnnnrlJLi�S._Z002d�R: and w;l�et,_Q„fl,jj, 7ooing (Si 1 Older lemon orchard to be removed IMDORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. • CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information requ red for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. f Date % - %-� �l—�7 Signature Title Pniect Manager Z � C c • RESIDE ?7TIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No,: Acacia Construction, Inc. #10762 Specific Location of Project: S.W. Corner of Baker and Foothill PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 84 3 Date proposed to .•hrgin construction: 9-1-81 4. Earliest date of Nodal ; and s of Tentative S. Bed_-oons Price Rance A - 2 OR mid $60's 8 - 3 BR low $80's RESOL'c;ION NO. 81 -54 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10762 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10762, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Acacia Constructi ^n, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a Planned Development of 84 condominiums on 9.6 acres of land, zoned for R -3, located at the southwest corner of Baker Avenue and Foothill Boulevard into 2 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on May 13, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings • in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10762 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. • Page 2 C • (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract flap No. 10762, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The site plan shall be modified to include the following: (a) Eliminate the two parking stalls located within the required front yard setback along Baker, east of Building k16, (b) Revise parking area located east of Building n17 to utilize parallel parking and to provide 10' minimum wide landscaped buffer along the westerly property line of the existing single family residences. 2. Automatic garage door openers shall be provided for all dwellings with garage aprons less than 20' in length. 3. Precise design and specific location of garden equipment storage sheds shall be submitted for review and approval • by the City Planner prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. A 6' high concrete block wall shall be constructed along the portion of the northerly boundary adjacent to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Sidewalks within the project shall be of Portland Cement or equivalent material. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 5. Construct the missing street improvements to include curb, gutter, A.C. pavement, driveway approach around the parcel at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue. 6. Widen the east side of Baker Avenue with A.C. pavement at the intersection with Foothill Boulevard for separate turn lane. 7. Construct A.C. berm along the edge of the existing pavement on the west side of Baker Avenue from southerly project boundary to the proposed catch basin. 0 Page 3 8. Construct flood protection wall along the west side of • the project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, 9. Any conditions imposed by Cal Trans for the project, shall be a part of the "conditions of approval" for the Tentative Tract. 10. Seismic design criteria, as defined by the Uniform Building Code, shall be utilized for the design of all structures. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Richard Oa hl, C airm�an ATTES Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho • Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, King, Tolstoy, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka DIPAA/Mttit Or COIPWOIty DEVELOPMENT` SNnDANO COIID1II &O SON"t: _.- =11 AIg111Canl: _ Location: °�_ —� �r LL f�Ll�i✓• Ihnse Items clecled are conditions of approval. AITL I(AW 9IIALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPL[NICE Wild iNE FOLLOWING CnhOl ❑ODs: A. S4�ry GrvN nj•nnml k- 1. Site shall to developed In accordance with tie approved site plans on file —l" in the Planning Division and the Conditions Contained herein. 2. P—isrd site Plan, and building elevations incorporating .11 conditions of ipp.ov.0 I.All be Submitted to the Planning Division prior to Issuance Of ir- M... ...Oi ti. (i ., ry,prnv..l of this request Shall not wA Ave compliance with all sections of ,be 2ovng D.duunlo and all other applicable city Odholooes in effect at tone of Building Permit issuance. _ A. the nwrl.ue, shall provide all lots with adequate sldayard area for Recreation ':eh¢le storage "11O.nl to MY staMafds. 5. iya•h redptaclo allal 11.111 be enclosed of is 6 foot high masonry wail with -- mstra[tin, gale oursaant to City Standards. Location Shall be subject 1. approval by the Planning Division. Y 6. A Sang,le Of the roof nuterial Shall be llbmittid to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building posits. 2. All reef .,,,I ..... Of, including Oil condf if one's. shall be Archilectus.11y integrated, z 'lld'd Imm r I,. end the sound buffered from adjacent proparill, and ztrrets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. Prior to any if or the prdjrct Site or business activity being c need tber[on, alt ponds tlmrs or approval contained herein shall be, completed to lhr ulri,lotion of the Oireelor of Com.mnity Oevelopnent. 9. ih.s al,;.mva1 shall Ire CUrn null and sold If building PC,mit, .1 not Issued for this prnlect .tihln one year from the dale of project approval. 10. At Cendsc final VY. Pemrt. this project shall became null and void in eilhlren (in) mpnlhs fro,, date of approval. unless pereltf are Issued or /' us, aIPr.,1J is 111111-led. y 11. r, deta.IM Illhtmg plan Shall be submitted to and approved by ter planning Dlvtivbn Pfi.r to fts,nnte or building nem,LS. Such plan small Indg.le style.'Illwmation, Iuceunn. Legnt and method of Shielding. No lighting ,hall adversely affect adjacent pPohtftltl. 11 • 1 Pro. «l N !_ --l! 12. All s.Seeing pools installed at the time of Initial develo aphst sMll be solar heated. _em inluv lied pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the developmtnt to connect dwellings with open Spaces and r— - -tmnal uses. ,i Id. All trash pick up Shall be for individual units with Ali receptacles shielded from public view. J! 15. Standard patio carer plans shall be Submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Bulldin9 Official prior to ocnipancy of the first unit. 16. All buildings numbers and individual units Shall be identified In a plea �r and Concise manner, Including proper illumination. Y Il. Solid ca ealerlar doors, security had bolls and I.Cll shall be Installed On each wit In this project. 16. Security devices such as window lacks shall be insbtled On each unit. 19. All vO.tS within this deeelopMnt shall be preplunaed to be ad ... old for A solar water beating unit. �20. Endrgy coe's'ning building materials Ind appliances a p rtI red m be incorporated Into this project to include such thinn, as but not limited to reduced consweltbn 11.11 heads, teller ,ado of Insulation• double paned windows, extended overhangs. pilotless appliances, e.C. 21. This development shall provide an option to Mme buyers t0 purchase a solar water heating unit. 22. Emergency secondary access shall be Grort,ed to tills tract to the sattilaetloh Of the foothill fill Protection District. _ 23. Local aM raster Planned Cquestrfen L a[IS shall M Prev,ded th'Ichmt the hart in accordance with fine Cqurstrsan trail flan. A detailed ryu•rtrian trail plan indicating widths maxien, slaes. Shsvcal con,bl coennn9 And eed ontrol. In adanCe with City C,ms,an rail t -, cl. Shll t be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and retardation of the final map. _ 21, this tract shall form or ante to a maintenance district for maintenance of equetrlan trails. 2S. Street n shall be reviewed and all-led by the city Planner. , .'dance with u¢ 'JCPted Street Naming Policy, prior to apPmval and reco,datrnn of the lint map. 26. If this dlvrIll ent intends to rn tn[t fluellrile or .—el rri, Ied u'.,I to specific lots or prohibit than entirely, thin a cap, of me C.C. a A.'s hest be submitted to and reviewed by the City Planner prior to Approval of final nap. P _ 2). Ton 1• rrt a.,u p,oviee Percent of affordable ...sing anmar alo•n.an,e .hen G�r,rsl Plan Mills, policies and the auS Leg ale. la naefh..e.t m t.r L...Ih e'.v.lgal.At Ordmence. Affordability shall 1• -1, [rrannr.' L/ [ l,111 e. set rate,, rent, and median I r level, al tie tied or [ .... a. of Vc.... cc, A. a9r n :n.... LD ..,. %rill be .n:'..ed Ly L•e City Planner prior to Issuance of building permits. A "iiula._"Cr-ac t. ill ba %, q lot landscaped islands shall Net a nlninua outside alienation o' 5 and snail contain in la- walk adjacent to parking stall. 2. Parki..g I�t trees shell be a v.lniasse IS gall.. sloe. _ 1- all t-D -way aisle .lain% shall be a memlmun of 26 feet wide. �s. (mrLn -ezy .11 1 ,hall be p,Delded, maintenance free end char, a .into.. Of 24 fret .. JeSat all bases during e.nstruttion In accordance with foothill Fire ..tint. /caul _Z5. All pan Ind sloe, shall be double striped. 6. All um is stall pe provided with ..10 it garage door openers. 1. Ory pat co visitor par mg areas shall be turf blocked. list lnvm entt, Cade, aid Re... tc ti cans shell restrict the store,, of recreational rte% con tin site unless they are the principle source of transportation for Lae Yg. uv m., i..q lion :e pe.mi uee wi Lein ene in Lerior co-c.la unn aisle other than In Cell- letl.'d visitor pa still, area,. Covenant,. rotes, and Re S,. ctlO of U %Mil 'e dnm•l.ped by tin applicant and '-"It'd to the City Planning C .anion pia, to usmn,e of bolding peri.lty. C la�nG /VC sing _Er 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan %Nil be suMltted to and approved by the Planning Oivisin prior to the Issuance of building penis. .11/ 2. fsisti, trees snail be retained wherever possible. A master plan of ntmg trres ,ho.inn then precise location, size and type shall be �uet - Dleo he the Gerel caper. Said plan shall take Into a t Ile p,opnsed a0 nq .sat trees ire to be retained, trimming ec th.ds. and where new Imes .,II Or planted for mplaccomo, of r raved treat. The plan Is required to be S,b,iticd to and oppr.. N by the Planning Division prior to approval of ire final grad leg plan. y > Street free,, - -1 .. of 15 gallon size or larger, atoll be Installed In .,mice .nth In a pallty Plan of street lens for the City or Rondo Cvca-a ga anJ lliall b^ Planted at an average of every 10' an Interior Streets and 20' on uterior streets. 2 P1 Feet W.___ �a. A .Inlarw of 50 tree, per gross acre, c.mprlsed of t12 following sties. Shall be provided within the d,e,I.pI,POtl 201-21' boa or faree r, 20: -15 gallon, and 101 -5 gallon. �5. All landscaped rteas shall be odiltIl.ed In a healthy and thriving Condluar free fee. ubedv, fresh. and debris. �6. All ,lope bells t as of rive (51 rcpt In vertical hef,6t and of 5:1 or ,Leslie slope shall be landso.ro and irrf,Ird in actonLnce Lb UDPr plinth, re,irevents of the City of Psn[n Cncaron,l. SuUi ,tile planting Shell include last not be lino Led to Lnnteo grn,md co and a ... p, .,to %Mobs Old treat. All sucn planti nq and irn,etlon %1,111 t co n manly mtaln d In a healthy and tW twin, Lnndill, by the Jevelol•• nnnlil racn individual Init is sold and D coiled by the Loser. Prior to releasior 'cupincy for those nits, an d.spec Ll On of the slopes shall be to nl by the Plannfng Staff to determine that Il Is in satisfactory tondllio... _Zg humec.nerzyas association naor foods table to the City. tasuch Proof or maintenance shall be %.witted to the City prior to issuance of building Paris.". a. the front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system. shell be installed by Live developer 1. accordance with solmitted plans. JZ9. The final desk. or the perimeter Mrl.ays, wells. lendscapl., and sidewalks Shall he included in the r l.ir,d landscape lens and shall be subject to approval by thle/l eeJ planning Division. x lo. A ninfnm !. Of i of the Lrees satiated wfill. 11. pr.fec,. Shan be %pet favors size trees. _ 11. Special landscape features such as unding, alluvial rock, z ecieN n n size trees, neand,ring Iideualks (iiillverticaT and Mori son sal change) and intensified IanJZUping, is redolent along 0. Signs j_ 1. My signs proposed fee this ii pre at Shan be designed In Conformance with the Comprrhenslve Sign ordinance and shall require review and app by the Planning Divl,i an prior to installation of sucn signs. —2. A can lform sign Progra. for this develosment Shull be subnitt, to the Planing Division for their review and approval prior to Issuance of Building Permit.. _ g. The signs Indicated on the Subtitled plans are not approved with this approval and will require ceps rate sign review and approval. C. MditfOnal approvals RmLred _ 1. Director Review shall be aCCwplished prior to the issuance of a Building Peres t. ]. psrr.. or pevie., 'bell Le ¢canpllsbed prior to recordation of the final .: do lv u,m, map. /' I. vet u, tr:.nl,ve tact Nn.ad %rsZ is grin trJ subjttL in the apPta vat �' I".:.. w..:. �' P¢. F+ �- ola...:...., w. n! cal««I,.,io..a- wr.«r..i�+.:� -_. a. U:IS f. :n'IUnnal Us:• rcnnrt is grYM1ed for a period or msolhf•.I at —'-- :,a, l., 11.. Planning fm'mission may add ar delete [unit l,Vnl or revoke the fun l,tlonal Use Pi nlnt. 5. IT, :I :.vc l prrr is r ,,led to obtain the rol lowing ai,.M statene`nl by -- ru f r".r"'s nI hams vn fah Lave A private or Pahl it ...estrian trail on or ad,nl,it In ILefr pi operfy. In rn11hilln9 ill, r me lelated n', Lot , Tract on I min 11 the C.C. F rt. i and d,1 116f Thee 11 ie Lot _ is d subject to A mutual reciprocal eas,.:cnl lot the purpose o1 eifovin9 epuestrian traffic w qv access. Ssgnrd Sa 1tl [td(tn£.t is to be Mid by the de"loper with the City prior to occ nl•v at /. 6. P, inr to approval and r ordation of the final map, or prior to issuance Of l.mn :^' dm r ^ils. ,a:.n no sm,mvi>ion map is invoked, written cerurcmuno oo: all 111,11rd Sivlal nillriots. shalt to s.bnrtlm m the 0rparnuoLL of -- Cr t/ N v.l nl. n[nt .1...h ,at,, Ihot adequate step.) facilities are or J will I�•c ll']I :Ie of dtCnvn..la t. nq >tod.vlls generated by this F..1oct. 5.11. 1.`tl.v cl [e,tihcatinn met bore teen issued 14 the School Du strict Willits r:y fcnl days n "or to We final map approve In be case of um s•.o:l.v,zlon nip or as sua rice of permits In the case of alt .,Wr residential NuJetl s. �7. , - Prier to aPDroval and ....idation of the final map. - Prior to the iss u anc [ l veal, we'I lien Carl l f.Cat ion fro tile of huf To,n.l 111rn its v moo is invn m dfhClol 1.111, nistr`cl, t4R ad•gmtr s and water facilities It Or ,,.11 , vulabie co z ur tn` P.aldvod rrOjrc6 sbnll be Sulmltled to the f C!' hrUrvel of rill S,xh letter nnlsl have tern 1>su,d by II^1` ^nLila u.. t n.... n i,+ n Cl ilnio slaty (10) days print to final slap approval in mi io ^ on of 1 ":`nn l> in the t a( alt bitter at ot it ce nl Lni rc t>In. I'e"s s .,m, a pllc lain f. .11tle> alluvahle ^s,..il tr 1. a x..q final Viler Cnnl,.l A ... of and u.r City. written r, l ll is rtinn of alt CPI' lahil,ly, loll ual n9 ill supportive W.,va cion. 54,.11 .r I t1.1.rj and Suln Vll r.' ', U., City. O. 1)av 111. n.al s`vil null d1.1 void If the trntativr zuhdtviz,un nap r. .l .11, 1.,1 a..d i•'[ n ,"d nr l.n,ld,n`l rr it, i»u ^d wlrn na l.... ,I: . ol... :, w,ll.in I... Iv. (12) r.nthl firm ll:r .1'i l`r l.val of this pitfall unl1 a. an r.,,n,uon n>'. 4 ". granted by ve Planning Ca- ..cession. 3 rroyact nu.__ 9. this subdivision was not sulaitled as a tol-hl drvelo+ lent r.o :1- and r 1, i...1 ld r•dl'p ly for A paint ,alin, relat+.r In Ill d. `. --trt : of he frmrlx nwlam +' +nl orduwnce 1. in, to M1n1 a.9ro v,t a :n . en of the map if the subdlrisian is 9mny It be developed as tract Pit CS. ' MPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE WILDING OIVISIOa FOR C04PLILnCE Illnl THE f0l'3 =116 rMl TIp➢Sc Site Oevel nllmeat �1. The appl leant I hit I C.Ply with ter latest anolnM Ifni fo:m Pn a ding rnd.- Uniform fkChaska) Cade, Uniform Plrrbmp Code, tlatinnal Electric Co.1` .t all other applicable codes And ordinances in effect at the tire of is$, .:e of relative remalIS. V1. Prior to Issuance of building permits for ca,k[stible Construction. rv.dr -cc 'ball be sulm:itled to the footlnll U,>trfct Clio Care[ that ,u,, y y water supply for fire protection is available, (ending completion of required fire protection systems. �). Prior to the issuance of A building n1 -11 wr rrsilr liel a....11 in, nil(,) o m.,ior adi,tion t. a . ^g unit(s).nun arN n.nf steel ref de,al01`w,it fees at the establi >t:Cds it,. I, I'll "I : be 1,milnd to: City Beautification pre, Auk I'll. 01,11111, • t 1re, Syseero Develofanent Pee. Permit and Plan Checking fees, and Scem,j Fern. _ a. Prior to ule Issuance of a building remit for a rt a c:al o en>tn.l deve loln:cnt ar addituan to an e.i,tiny drvrl nl• :.^n, ltn 1a r(`l .. 1.11 Ir.11 IVy dcvelor:nent fees at the established Iato. SdLu fees may mcl,le. b'f, not be I ... itod to: SystM6 pev<laima`nt fee, ore ma)e Fee. Pmmlt And Flan Checking fees. �5. Street addresses shall be Dr.,dld by In, building ollic:e 1. 6. &.chin, untts s:wll be obstructed with lire retardant material and don- - combustible roof material. 1. An corner with e-Ji9s shalt love the tuilding fir: atinn sad rig ing st ea puthded Wien aedi uoewl ,rood trim around W.onvs and ,nod mmn9 or Plant- put wbn'e aDProyri ale. G. Sinn Sbncmrns I. P.'nvidl vnplf once .,to [ e Uhl rn. :n 0711-1 Coe r pros :re o v line 111."n- (alnkdeting esq area am ere -peso u,rnrss of r,i11 rig 4u,sa,ngs. _L [u tth,g bui W-,11) >hall be mall to :1! .,n, .n. a.0 la, n.1 and 2nn imp regulations for Ube hr,nOed me or tin l.u,lov , > ill Ir dr u114Led. --3. fhi :ti..y soon[ drrmal fuiltt ics Stall PC :rv" od, f>ll.d "Wit, upped to comply with the Uniform Plu :"log Code. and pm(orm Bu.ldmg Code. nl tr. , wn)eat property $hall he In accordance with the Unlfom Ca ty 6: W ing SaandarJS and accepted grading ryac tICes. The flan ihrll ee in so .... Ali l (en fen :uhf! with the aPprUVeJ 2. c c, na r .. t alau le ruralld by a named engineer licensed ly me ' ,a SlItr .1 C.lrfa.ma to P -farm such .Ark. Y B. A lAq :cJ r part i,,It be p,,,,red by a qualified engineer or goologtst vJ v,. —t IJ at the I'll of 111lication for 9radrn9 Plan Inca. J. In. Irn rl yn irnA Plan iry 11 to subject to rev ) ew and apyroval by the 6r al :nq (` a a,J :hall be crvnrilted prior to ...e,datiun of the final s „b,v r: ;inn nr.ir or lssoar:ce or 6uildsng Permit whichever ochres first. .a a c-s,m -Inl subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: 1. et h+” to le"11 and an agreement a cuted, gnurante•an9 completion all o -vie drainage facilities note suY for derraterin9 all parcels, to the snisfactr on of the Building and .Safety Division. a n W ants, for safe drssol of drainage sro ter that are —t-d unto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and to the sausraction of the Sullding and Safety Division. C. si nege I:. +provrncn [i. necessari for de.alerio9 or pm tee [ing _� uU rrnled nro+ a ace [A he in talled Prior to is S oa n of Ln l.lu rem.. is for constro",en ::Pon any parcel that ma Y besublect V•., or ""t' 'but" ten, drai ®ge flows entering. leaving o r within A bare el relative W which a bnllding perm+t is requested. A. I-,xa gradlel plans for each parcel are to be sutrnitted to the Building n,d S,f.:y orvrsion for approval prior 1. nsuanfe of building permits. M-rs 11, be An an mere :wen tent Ar C.cpsite basis.) r. All .lore banks in a ess of five (S) feet in vertical height and of 5.1 nr ironer store shall iz teoed with native grasses open completion of gu,lr•g or Sao- o[n.r alternative .,thud of erosion cuntrol shall Ir u,giiel..l to lie soturscllon bf the Building off¢Val. Irn gat ion 11,111 It' I,uv1J "d In ;rrnina [! Cl:e seed and maintain groulh to a pint e ,ITT 11 al.er 9r,miruucn- fill tfa:T ','Ali 111•.IAC1 Ten (lv_I O; rolnc 019151on rent CIesPLIhn CE WITH TIE MIMING t116 C'v`I1 1. E, 14 :rL $Briar n.0 ^s t. P,J i<,; :r ^a s+an I wane by anal map of all In ter IA, I ,let r1 Ill t1- ot -.11 and all meets, ry ratenenls as shown on Ch. tentative map. 4 prul+<l I:a. 2. eediulloo shall be made of the following rlghts.or -.ay on the following street: a.idlllonal loot on ..Id.t onal feet on -- "'-- -' -' -- _________ auditicuai fret on _ 3. Lorne, properly line halm .in be required per City star.darn:. Ae a. All his of reh ¢cal ar trig ss d egrns Iron shut$ to +s•J ic+lcd as IPl lows: aL�_-_/1fP .__ -__ --- A45. life iprncaI case -en is 11:111 be Plus 111,d 1A1.r I nq ..test to allIra tels aver pro vale roads. drives, or purling areas, and shall be noticed 1, �1 the map A shall be recorded eonovr.nt .ith the mao. 6. MM..te provisions shell be made for the mires,, egress and internal circulation or any truths which .111 be used for del fiery of goods [o the property or m Ire operation Ar the r. npnsrd out lnry s. _ 3. private d,.rAA,e osertnls for Cross -lot drainage Shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final nup. B. 111 rin'sting e-ler is lying nilhin future right- of -.1y are to Le q.itclaiped or to be delineated on the help per City Engineer's re•rylrMents. 9. Eas.ments If, sidewalk for Pettit uses shall Le deli [e teJ to the City .here sl dew. iks meander through private property. J. Street lmproveneen,a 1. Construct full street Inprevenents including, but not limited to, torb and gutter. A.C. pIvenot, sidrwulk, drive app'.Uies, park.ay real and street light, on all Int.r for streets. 2. A allnimm of 26 -toot .to, pavmnmt within a 4U-foot wide dedicated right -oP.aY shall be coast... led Pow all half- ,,CtjAA streets. X,3. Construct the following missing lmproremenbs Including, but net LLSO t .L $- U eRuw - -3111 S IPELf tiNlE LIIf1LN pYlil. +NLN APPR. tlr-0IS IIVf At AY ISI haU 0 ➢ILR of 47, includes landscaping and Irrigallon on rcter. ,rr( ,("I '. rnp ir.'lir:irg in It r[ rinlrl - ar -ulY. f•I 6. .n r v -rev.[ t1r011 be Ooln lnrJ Irren lM 0.' cin _ let!c n! eCCr.I•lanCe fro, J4nnstrecn pr Jrrr:/ tr rr t O Oty (np mrtr't pllgc. a to aJdlllen to any lber 1•ermltz regni. td. r air" no, [ fVrm (I iron [ire l.a[L fle.S rule per rJlf 1•r epee lrrt. X 6. r City (Jq If CCr. i a^rpr v¢rinll I5 1 r l n.l j -r .n L•r Lr rr 111.1 eelA 4v , Ilnlrr rA 0i 1 IvP 11 L'CI.`rCA tlrn.to rq.rin ng a C1 +Ln-til Ili -I, o., .1115. I'. Iru b. latun4trtol .vr fnv 4II lr'..cnt Vey nrf t. fur.11 4l'c J.bc el'1'rm err s, foiled 111, -1 [rono 1r:n ;,• 110.1 I rya 11a of pr ol, L•y 'lull ev.. Il.e location of all ealibng utility r' ra l l to and /car Iaods[ar[d earth berms and relic] nr.r...... at fv tl tl v' wlrr.n 1Lt r'I SL Lai -na r. p cry Ifre. n. X 6, an a r11 'lull be no;led and a alreenent rceeulN to lhr• sa t(:fa[tlan y �_ 8. Tiff folldvilrg slum drill 5 '11 be in t 11 s a al tl.. [i;Y feel in ,nJ CI tr rtttornr Y. tyro fan tee iI. eJ to tM is tr slur {eon the City Cn9l nenr. Of I, of for m record in9 or tl,e e'en [or tit I,m, nl t'r ,nlf ,. In ovntoo care or nni, nr nrnenrq rcfrrri tt, .nmhever ewres firs t. g Ii�M i 9_.Lxi,£ /._ f%l nxL eonJ.gVVU� /a lh� a✓CJ1rnmeJr ' _X_ ). nn ;It rn rn. nvom.ns slrJll be ]nstOlcd to the !aye {.berrndi� 36c! /._ nl:/.ea[�ca.Ih/a$r, "no"O 11 6)f%GVie6.b of %n ltJ,factian of u,e C IT Lea l nrcr, pf i or to occupancy. 1PnlJKedP_aXisfp 5q N9V X n. re.r,r ipug, 9. Prior to recrrda ti on or p.. [ mar. oJa -seal' rye•m rgR Jrr% caramagb _ _ rnl sU ,rl inn. u'a ffj, and street Herne si 9111119 tbnlI be rcnniremnts study for the p,cj,,, sNll M w,n(t led t tl.e tit till Eng rr soy m:[.a'•.`J r' toe of lire City InginCep rev, err. reru,r. na r shall .,,,,in oben for L. cat it l ties Ion,tru[tmn Iry ua nl all ui" `rflc and -1 eeloull Ill, in, [o'l,y[unn. r1 •Intl he r,,.Frt4 m envu' cane cult nr gr as inq am _X- 1. Provide all utility zoo ,i[m en o+r6 lot Inc l „auq t.n r[,.1 It`n.pn:,t nn. rb.e !-Ill br r,flnd•J nn cu:rpl a lion of tile construction t0 - rtn ter, el ri<rytwegf9as, to lennon,• 11110 Uble Irl evla+un Ile: aatrtl.u.LOn of tbC City L19 inee r. V ” in call. _X 2. All cl,litles wi Llrin {M praJect 'halt hr ,. car n _x 10. I:a l,. +y: •,Ir,JI le pruri led Le WCen public sideeal is and on -s lie grcun,f Including utllfties alon 1,,, 9 ma JOr ar .ar .15 Irz' Iran 12 it. V IL t:r+an Hera a. (1111,.11 X 3. utility entrmcn[s scan be Ir W,d 1 rte (` _q. rbatm, I" Oil c t scaly cards SI M.al ki. llndor tlJnmlk Lr in urr,ng utility cenpaniM one to, clfl En lame. ill still 511111 'll Ctal leJ to city Standards. Stu Ji 4. neleloprr 12. en shall Ile ruponpble for the relaca Unn of r ' ist i11g vubhc utillt fns, t -o' i"I'lltO' anJ /or rroz inn control rocalort, in 1+• anti;, nlicn of the City En9l nrcr, at end of 11 be Loral led end of Stub Stivela. 4 = as regulred. nt of Jra oral.• runoff lrwo lbe dorms Crean ryvner{Y lrltb of nI.- S. shell be !nr in• i nttall,l con of M1gal "'o;e n..rrrrs tlrn ll Ln frgr:I feA. in ie<onrr o-4 .nq Cordoned WlM1 South,— $OUtMrn OI(f4rn1., [d rtnn L' dny Llr .vr.l_ rino•1 sto'r'y ...__ _. iS 6. and JN SlanJa rd3, Eater a.., tc•.cf plans seal, to rreurlr.eJ +nl inncl. nC 1" In m�.y - eats of tee frets. anm+ C•ro.,," yr nra,.ru Lc:. le,e r rr. I. lLr arplsc.mt vrll or retnoniible (4r ccA.......A. bf all on -site tvia 1. rf rrrll Jod tJ¢ Lu,rot.n. 11(al lo-a llh rv;. /- nfau we Iao llue3 relw lreJ by IM1e City C•9 inee r, St.. :n, rl r..• c..lnr r( San pool ud'ce. A lett['r of cw nh anCe Len (6.3 be r� .__. ]. b.tr.arcunn nee ins .111 he rrdm red at the rot laving Idea lidos: X. g. ..It n u, red n' +ar to a only ti on. al'I ". " +,It Im'c not boom secured Lnrr all nl"...• . e.r rv.r. mbvr -,led [•I Ir.r (rrr,l egrnurn vrvo lIlIt r1,`Irreval rnl• rr ell h to it ccl to are rrQe, rnnrn Y rn ,.. car io u ens see ienlr.. at'111.1 eft to ti that n:eY M recd ved bum ill o. Pl !...... .r r. ., ar• :ulrnr ,1 noon IC ar.n , zr.bJr.c{ w voce n- ro,nlo a1 _ na_grr r_r..rr{s enn_Lp.._y.tt It I. n: nrn11t or u.`t n. olra, one ntr ofd ma11a' no, aa.t City n n p 1. Permits e a.Lnm.. _C trdn 'deer agenurs .,11 to nwi•rn as fell o -s: I ^atoh," on.f, will Lr "it p. nl.r1 O. yl, cat tern rt Ly are. rung torte fr,.ren to t{fe�h;r{Dr.l obi X / Int, rt Inr: Fo -rt. ( .f_(_r En., 1, 14a nb rr.i h..,.r are - q lr.. S. 1.1,.11- .rplav .a.e _%: "I'll be mLle for act [P drrt< ur.l ni:Pn Cal of __ C. Sin n.'rn.,rdtno (runty r1ueJ (a.r t. nl Or ;tnU u.l rr nn rnn n. ermnng me pl.ptrl, from a.slam¢'rnn. 0. Ot,.m V CunJ+nons and Ms V let ions IC.[. 6 h.'sl Ino +:Pwboatp ntY Stellr LV r 'corded twith il', S1 n+0 to u. +\ al ll.e Ury + +::1 a ta.Y ftnr +J(J to t" CITY. X 1. 1.,.,1 V c•1 • =J vsl r>DS stall tnnl orm la Ci IY SUndsrdi lid be re a +dcd Vr for to lu 0111 st ase 10:11... Wit to d .. < Vino. m un .c.9::,z,l Da reels. a „auct of Inttnl ion to Imm and /or loin e filyd .. 51-1 C +tY r1141ntl1. "It, , ^I'o r¢[InS lliS trf Ct fineu nan Im 11 Lc Lau,c etl:� . IveU trt tl+ L..11..I. r, re reQUi reE to ER annexed Into the "+ 6. III V�+•trr landaolcd DJr WAYS a �_ L: r, •.c :rc :,.,,nl a.e me mst, is t. )_ Lue'v.: Jr +1 a "J , r. ge uon s >rt�retl isOlraCt are.0it51�11 0v mn[ nnwslY of anal a2tV led by the City and mn.ed ,:, �ne to:J::ave nann mnce Ja LLrat. • • • ORDINANCE NO. )Aiy • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 207- 191 -31 AND 40 FROM R -3 TO R- 3 /P.D. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 84 CONDOMINIUMS ON 9.6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BAKER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental • impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessors Parcel No. 207- 191 -31 and 40 are hereby zoned to R- 3 /P.D. (multiple family /planned development). SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1981. AYES: NOES:. ABSENT: 19 Phillip O. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Ta—ss—e—r—m5`n,-rTVy-n-e—rV 0 • 9 STAFF REPORT DATE: June 17, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B.Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Consideration of Vacation of Cleveland Avenue between 7th Street and 8th Street The subject vacation was requested by Caldwell Company to vacate a portion of Cleveland Avenue between 7th and 8th Streets. The adja- cent property is vacant at this time, therefore, the potential fu- ture need for Cleveland to be continuous to the north of the rail- way is uncertain. The City Council adopted Resolution of Intent 81 -68 setting the Public Hearing to consider the vacation of Cleveland on June 17, 1981. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council deny the vacation at this time and reconsider the matter when development applications are received on any of the abutting properties. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BK:jaa Attachments h Ida, I i �g ti o mm� Nm ti o� ti 4cm m� c do Kc =.TCH TO ACCOMPh.NY A��aNCOi ll�1c.�IT Naa T k' '�S. ... o., , 1 . r L LOT 13 LOT 1. LOT 1. I.' LOT 3 1 LOT 4 — . 1. T LOT I p LOT I LOT LOT LAND Ll'�C o AGftlC'VrUFiC f LOT 11 LOT I LOT 11 Ll I LOT \ LOT I.— ZONED: M-2 10 ...... TENTATIVE PARM MAP NO. (.194 AFFlnncrr OF POSTING • NOTICE OF HEARING FOR f• VACATION OF STREET SLATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. coory OF SAN BERNARDINO) I declare, under penalty of making a false oath, that I am now, and at all times mentioned hotels was, the duly appointed, qualified and acting Super- intendent of Streets in the City of Rancho Cucnmonga, That on the — 4th-day of Junes 1981 caused to have Posted a Notice of Hearing for Vacation of Streets, a copy of which Notice is attached hereto and made a part hereof; that the Notices were posted not more than three hundred (300) feet apart along the line of the street and that not less than three (3) Notices were so posted; and that the pasting was completed • on the _--E-O—urth day of _jpne , 1981 This Declaration Made This 9 day of _, 19_ Suporin tondont of Strocts of tho City of Rancho Curnmonga RESOLUTION NO. $1 --rJ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE, BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH STREETS. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 81 -63, passed on May 20, 1931, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:00 p.m. on June 17, 1981, in the Lion's Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation; BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that a portion of Cleveland Avenue is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Nap No. • V -012 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, set forth in Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 4: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jcl, Exhibit "A" Legal Description - Cleveland Avenue Abandonment: That portion of the unnamed street as shown on the map of Cucamonga Lands, in the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Cali- fornia, as per plat recorded in Book 4, page 9 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County being more particularly described as the Easterly 10.00 feet of Parcel Map 6194, filed in Book 62, Pages 62 through 66 of Parcel Maps in the office of said County Recorder laying Northerly of the Northerly line of 7th Street as shown on said Parcel Map No. 6194 and Southerly of the Southerly line of Bth Street as shown on said Parcel Map No. 6194. Subject to covenants, conditions, reservations, restrictions, rights of way and casements, if any, of record. • O� � 0 • STAFF REPORT W DATE: June 17, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Rubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Establishment of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District #1 Attached for Council approval is a Resolution and Engineer's Report establishing the 1981 -83 Fiscal Year Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. As indicated in the report this years assessment will be $63.04 per lot, which is a reduction from the estimated $95.18 assessed for 1980 -81. This reduction reflects the lower and more accurate historical data and also expansion of the District. The report also points out that pay- ments received over actual cost for last year will be credited against payments for this. The current maintenance district includes 187,449 square feet at $0.30 per square foot for a total amount of $56,234.70. The unit price of $0.30 per square foot is broken down as itemized below: Contract Cost $0.15 per sq. ft. Water $0.06 per sq. ft. Electricity $0.02 per sq. ft. Misc. and Vandalism $0.07 per sq. ft. 0.30 per sq. ft. It should be noted that the Engineers Report adopted in the Resolution of Intention has been modified to reflect more accurate cost data available from the recent contract award and further research of uitility costs. The modification was a reduction from $0.35 to $0.30 per square foot. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Engineer's Report and the 1981 -82 Assessment of $63.04 per lot. - Respectfully �submitted, LDIl ib lc Attachment lay • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I SECTION I. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4 Chapter I, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Land- scaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The report deals with the actual costs for Fiscal Year 1980 -81 and the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1981 -82 of Landscape Maintenance District No. I for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Areas to be included in the work program are specifically defined In the body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. The total area of said parkways being 187,449 • square feet. Work to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any parkway Improve- ment. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATION The plans and specifications for landscaping have been prepared by the developers for the individual subdivision parkways. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each subdivision and as approved by the City Planning Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscape areas. The plans and specifications for landscape Improvement on the individual tracts are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications ® were attached hereto. , /a� Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maint. Dist. No. I Page 2 L Detailed maintenance activities on the enumerated parkway areas include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data adjusted for inflation, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purpose will equal thirty cents ($.30) per square foot for the fiscal year 1981 -82. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. 1980-81 Estimated Assessment Cost $.40 x 167,522 sq. ft. = $67,008.80 Per lot Annual Assessment - $67,008.80 _ 704 = $95.18 Per lot Monthly Assessment - $95.18 r 12 = $7.93 1980 -81 Actual Costs $.25 x 167,522 = $41,880.50 Actual per lot annual cost (695 lots) = $60.26 1980 -81 Actual Assessment - $95.18 X 695 = $66,150.10 Actual Assessment ($66,150.10) less Actual Cost ($41,880.50) = Surplus $24,269.60 Surplus ($24,269.60 = 695 lots) _ $34.92 overpayment. 1981 -82 - Estimated Assessment $.30 x 187,449 sq. ft. _ $56,234.70 $56,234.70 = (695 + 9 + 188) = $63.04 $56,234.70 less (695 X $34.92 or $74,269,40) = $31,965.30 (695 lots X 28.12 ($63.04 - $34.92 surplus) + (188 + 9) X $63.04 = $31,962.22• Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment Diagram. Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maint. Dist. No. I • Page 3 SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed Master Assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A". Detailed diagrams of each tract are included. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Improvements for the entire district are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. ORDER OF EVENTS I. City Council approves institution of District proceedings. • 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to form a District and sets a public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer iiles a report with City Council. 6. Every year In June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 19 17► CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA BANYAN Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. City C erk 7 i Q Q 7 6 W J f` W Q 4 J 0 J Q 2 V Q Q S r. 9 i F LEGEND Assessment District Boundary + Landscaping Area TRACT 9267 end •epnar ea•. nn. T '? h Y J • 0 W h ti N F i ti W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 53 5Z 5/ 50 49 4B M,9NZHN /7g OR. ),17 20 2 21 2 22 2 23 W /B / /7 / /b W25 / SUNFLOWER ST. I 2 3 4 5 6 Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. City C erk ..o,..., T / N W S h WW h i LEGEND Assessment District Boundary ■Landscaping Area TRACT 9268 I 10F 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. City C erk W R 0 2 r C t 7 LEGEND — Assessment District Boundary Landscaping Area I TRACT 9268 I2 OF 2 J • va CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA WILSON AVE. 39 38 29 Y7 40 37 25 26 i 36 30 i 25 Q K < q2 2 35 $1 Yq F 43 j 3q 32 23 4J C0770NWO0p 33 W 22 I•ygY �n0 YI O 2 3 y 20 a 16 = /9 � 17 < /B Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this _ day of 1979. LEGEND Li ty C erk — Assessment District Boundary m� Landscaping Area TRACT 9269 /p 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 111 STATE OF CALIFORNIA W /LSON AVE. ! ve vB W 2 se va 41 3 s/ a Y6 .. W y s2 = vi U Q J Q 5 07 Y9 • CO7710NW00O WAY tu ti 6 7 // e Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of LEGEND 1979. — Assessment District Boundary won* Landscaping Area City Clerk TRACT 9269 I2oF2 snq .nq,e.o Fa.. 311'. T �� /^ B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA E t V' 2 Q Q N e C' /9 20 2/ 22 23 24, Lp C ac /np yi ra y1 39 Y1 39 9r 37 Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this _ day of 1979.) City Clerk ory ..,. aw .c.*. 13,89 Tw: b R C On. j Q Q m U U Q LEGEND — Assessment District Boundary wiiiiiiiiiiILandscaping Area T 9305 I / IF 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM , LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 Q43 36 29 j Q /I 46 35 30 /a 2 Q LIV7 3Y 31 9 33 32 H6 AL MONp ST. 0 Q m 7 6 5 4 3 2 U Q Filed in the Office Of the City Clerk this day of 1979 LEGEND .— —Assessment District Boundary Landscaping Area City C erk TRACT 9306 2 F 2 0 1 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this ,day of 1919. City Clerk A 63 5 PJ� bti 6 1 J `0 0 9 Q�PR'S 59 NO h0 p h1 99 39 S�F 41 +� syF� A0 36 410 A ,I I� \I r, yM 3g LEGEND Assessment District Boundary mmm Landscaping Area .nr ..o,.... ...... V) W Z 4 CL Q 5 TRACT _ 935/ l of 2 �� A i vq 0 d V i q VI i 4 O n. C1 M C C � W d d tJ c W N V J d 72 N N Q J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 16 117 I6 N i 19 2 a 0 1D 21 MARBLE AVE. pg 22 23 21 25 26 27 TRACT 935/ laa7 -nP w ray. eoa. T 2 • i d T a+ U d L Y O U 4� O Vim. T O q d° L Y a vi rn r•L 01 2 OF 2 B 0 • 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA L E MON AVE. 1/7 12 I Q Q 46 45 94 143 42 4a 39 3B // Z ORANGE 5T. 37 30 3/ 32 33 3M 35 36 29 a 7 6 xe Q 27 BRISTOL DR. W m 19 1 20 21 1 22 23 1 24 ¢ 26 2 25 filed in the Office of the City Clerk this _ day of 1979. City C erk LEGEND Assessment District Boundary N�Landscaping Area TRACT 9402 I G �u TRACT 9403 I 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA j ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA y COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO c° L °1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ., V I u u i, o 01 Ii 21 10 z ci c u � E m d N G O U 8U TL 9 4J T C U t % 0 r iic IB /t IO 21 zr \ Z4 20 LL 6 'j h/ .z T� sa+eRUr 4 —_ oc I 40 26 at 90 2 � �34, !L F � 3s 3c I ! a 3B I )v OWJE ALTA wMA TRACT 9403 I 7 0 E 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 Y 9 10 I W Q nn\ Y 6 7 j 2 POPLgR STREET a � Q Q J h 2 29 29 E7 26 25 U WILSON qVE. Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. City Clerk, LEGEND Assessment District Boundary r� Landscaping Area TRACT 9430 I l of 2 A U T Ur MAINUMIJ UIJUAMUNIJA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Q POPL RR 57, Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. City Clerk LEGEND Assessment District Boundary Landscaping Area TRACT 9430 I20F 2 B 0 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA P26 20 23 CALM OR. 1 TRACT 9434 I 9 3 /q 1$ 17 Iv Wj 27 4 t/� 28 29 e 7 /O 9 x �^ 30 Q MANGO sr. J Q 2 s 31 � 32 Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979,— LEGEND —Assessment District Boundary Landscaping Area City Clerk TRACT 9434 I 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Filed in the Office of the City Clerk I this day of 1979. City Clerk 2 i ¢ i /3 vi \, lql�— AVE r a 7 8 / 22 0 21 LEGEND Assessment District Boundary I.andscaping Area • • RACr 1 943GG /O943GG /O til/ nymor 6C.e urn dui / y �' • 40 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 56E YfFcr 9f;6 Y i7 6 9 12 es 19 2 if 20 c la 21 4 � 3 it Q y CU 2B 23 U 9 j 27 6 � 26 25 24 Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. City Clerk LEGEWB Assessment District Boundary ■=w Landscaping Area TRACT 9437 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA / /2 /J 2 N 3 /0 j U ¢ /5 i 3 B • ¢ 6 7 16 BANYAN p 20 /9 B Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of , 1979. LEGEND City Clerk — Assessment District boundary Landscaping Area I TPA u_<,. .9444 I 12 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA • 30 Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. City Clerk k N 2G 1 25 1 3Y � 23 22 21 20 1 /f /B 1 17 /6 BURGUNDY RyE, h Q 2 / N qqc NIB R2D AVENUE LEGEND Assessment District Boundary Landscaping Area TRACT 9445 I /3 I U 4 v " 39 3a 37 36 35 3Y 73 J 2 Y3 BURGUrypy RYE. 31 UI 43 Yf 50 5f SL 61 � Ys YB 5/ i 5Y 57 60 Y6 Y7 FFt::V 59 57 52 V SS • 30 Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. City Clerk k N 2G 1 25 1 3Y � 23 22 21 20 1 /f /B 1 17 /6 BURGUNDY RyE, h Q 2 / N qqc NIB R2D AVENUE LEGEND Assessment District Boundary Landscaping Area TRACT 9445 I /3 I U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY TE OF SAN SA1N0 CALIFORNIA CALIFORN i r H Z Q Q I 2 3 q 5 b S5 Sc ¢ q9 � 3B N qd i7 i2 1/7 Q 0 SL 53 $ J q/• Q iq VINE 0 Q 3g I 30 F 25 40 y 38 3/ ZB 4/ 4 37 i2 O 27 • 36 33 26 q3 35 3y 25 q9 SrRBET g 9 l 10 111 112 113 i N 1 13 1 16 1 17 I IB I I! I20 I ZI 124 1 27 1 23 II50uTNEpN PAUF /c R. R RAW Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this __ day Of 1979. City Clerk aq •nq,m.r r.a.. au. T' LEGEND -- Assessment District Boundary ,..w Landscaping Area TR4 454 I ,ter 0 u CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA T t a c a JG u 53 32 37 � JS i t m J D Q 34 31 36 34 c+ o u w` mn 33 30 39 33 ; w .n J N N ? SG 49 Oo 32 q 57 46 41 31 38 V 47 42 W 30 O Q) 39 46 43 29 Q Z 43 44 26 HEATHER ST T u v L V 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 26 27 O L Q W W V O V /B /] /G /S 14 /3 12 if RING AVE C W m v 197N S T. I TRACT 9472 I 15 /O I TRACT 9472 I 15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE, OF CALIFORNIA BASELINE 1a le 3L T le S9 9! 391 a3 It ll Y 1Z 3 4i 1 zs al ae a9 Q 45 aI zl u u ao 14 97 /z n 9 ,y 48 rs IY z r/ re W 49 rJ I • W 50 U 5/ �r 52 Sy Filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of 1979. City C erk LEGEND — Assessment District Boundary w� Landscaping Area I TRACT 9480 I 16 ear enlinaar r.al. uau T IZ • • 9 CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT'I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE. OF CALIFORNIA N � i 2y 23 26 27 2B 29 30 31 22 23 APR /COT 5T. ti N l W 2! / z 3 Y s 6 1 B 9 1 /o 1 // LEMON AVE. TRACT, 9637 a k EXHIBIT A N O Z F` W W 4 4 v CITY OF, RANCP) CUC40NGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTE N At; r,E DISTRICT N0. 1 ANNEXATION P2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERN AR 0 NO STATE OF CALIFORNIA g4AU GE ST6[{.T 4 T c 5 4 i z NI5!IIANP AVENGE TRACT 9225 F- w v S V 10F 2 • ti J yC F N J Ui i r Uri t<ANUH') CU CAT( )NGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i ANNEXATION °` 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN DENNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA r� CFAU_;C h77CEE1' Wai'4P'i0 .1�f.VC� s I Uel. TRACT 9225 V L r L h 2 OF 2 r<ANUHN.) CUCAI( )NGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION a 2 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,___J l .--j SUNFLOWER 5 r. i 6 5 0 J 2 W 0 TRACT 9176 • a A si vI( r r1 r', J I-UUAI( MOA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIN TENA N6 DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION 02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA HIGHLAND AV E. a„ TRACT JSG 7 w Q a 0 U-1 r UIIY C( RANCI,O CUCAC ONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCF DISTRICT NO. t ANNEXATION #2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA �I I I w � a' I z W 7 Y_ I I TRACT `NO E • 435 11OFI RESOLUTION NO. %i —'t 5 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1981 -82 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LAND- SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N1. • It WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 20th day of May, 1981, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. to order the therein described work in connection with Landscape Main- tenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. was duly and legally published in the time, form and ma,ner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdication facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work; SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public inter�,t and con- venience requires the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District 81 for the fiscal year 1981 -82, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for fiscal year 1981 -82 and method of assessment in the Eningeer's Report are hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M, Wasserman, City Clerk Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor INTER-OFFICE. MEMO DATE June ux xux,mno ROM ALBEA. R. REID PHONE 7221 / Asst. Co. Admin, Officer TO HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS cc: Robert B, Rigney John Shone Alan Marks Tim Johnson SUBJECT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CUCAMONGA CREEK PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of Supervisors, acting as the governing body of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, take the following actions; 1. State its intent to proceed with a Zone I financing program which will raise sufficient revenues to fund the Deer Creek extension of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control project, This program is to be based on: al a benefit assessment program of $9 million • which has been unanimously recommended by the West End city councils or their mayors, bl acreements with various major landowners t.lrough which those developers will loan $2 million to the project as needed to meet the total estimated project cost of $5,9 million, 2. Authorize the Director of Transportation and Flood Control to notify the Army Corps of Engineers of the Flood Control District's intent to proceed with the financing of the Deer Creek project, and 3. Authorize the eminent domain proceedings which have been recommended by the .Architect and Engineering Division relative to the Cucamonga Creek project. BACKGROUND: Recently, the Board of Supervisors held a workshop to consider the Flood Control Benefit Assessment efforts and the Cucamonga Creek project. As a result of that meeting, the mayors of Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga organized a meeting of all West End cities and affected It. 116 7-000 1 r -2- land owners to determine if they could develop a • recommended Deer Creek financing program for Board of Supervisor approval. Since that time, extensive efforts have taken place by all parties with the following results: The West End cities have recommended the program shown in Attachment 1. This program recommends a one -time benefit assessment to raise $4 million of the required $5.9 million matching share. The $4 million dollars would be raised by a $5 per unit assessment in the areas outside the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario. Areas within the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario would be subject to an approximately $30 benefit assessment. The balance of the monies would be raised by written agreements from major property owners in the area. In addition, the recommendation limits assessments on vacant and agricultural properties and recommends that in the future, development fees be considered by the Flood Control District for areas which have major Flood Control drainage problems. The recommendation also provides for the creation of a Zone I committee to consider preparation of a future comprehensive benefit assessment program to be submitted to the Zone I electorate in the near future which would include the financing of *aintenance and Operations, emergency repairs and repayment of loans. (Attachment 1) In addition, this Committee has been working with the major land owners concerning the balance of monies needed to complete the project. County Counsel has, in conjunction with attorneys from the land owners, drafted a loan agreement which is included as Attachment 2. In this agreement, these land owners, in essence, agree that if all other reasonable efforts to defer cost or raise funds fail, they will by June 30, 1982, loan the Flood Control District the balance of monies needed to finance the Deer Creek project. As part of this agreement, the County, or Flood Control District, would be required to: a) defer al-1 possible right of way acquisition costs to subsequent years. • v 1 -3- b) initiate assessment proceedings on vacant land adjoining Deer Creek to raise the necessary funds to complete the project. It should be noted that this agreement is in draft form and has to be reviewed by each contributive land owner before full commitment is reached. The city /county effort does not conflict with the efforts of the Benefit Assessment Citizens Committee since the Committee has, to date, stated that the Board of Supervisors and West End cities should take any actions they consider appropriate to resolve the Cucamonga Creek project. ARR: nm Attachments ki 14), is PFLPC&yL FOR = O=K PP P ENDING C£' PA.1Y:C 4 SdAItd June 2, 1981 In order to meet the local commitment of $5.9 million for the matching share of the $35 million Cucamonga Creek project, a small group of City and County representatives has met and proposes the following: 1.• A one -time benefit assessment would be approved in order to raise $4 million of the required $5.9 million matching share. 2. Private sector developers would be asked to raise the re- • naining $1.9 million by submitting irrevocable letters of credit to the County of San Bernardino. As reimbursements are received from the State, the County will reimburse develop- ers for their contributions. 3. Assessments will be different for those cities which are within the watershed area and for those cities which are within Zone I, but are outside of the watershed areas. 4. The maximum assessment per unit for property outside of the watershed area will be approximately $4 -10. The specific fiaures are not available at this time', but will be available on June 2, 1981. . ,��7 -z- 5. A "unit" ecuals a "typical" R -1 lot (7,200 scuare feet x • benefit coefficient). The benefit coefficient is being worked out by the engineers assigned to study the benefit assessment district. 6. Development fees to finance local drainage projects are already levied or are being considered by most cities. It may also be appropriate for the County to consider a similar fee structure for unincorporated areas which have major flood control or drainage problems. 7. Land use assessments would be as follows: Vacant /Unimproved - Exempt • Agriculture /Dairies - Exempt Residential - Assessment on unit basis Commercial 6 Shopping Centers - Assessment on unit basis Industrial /Downtown - Assessment on unit basis It is important to note that the one -time benefit assessment is to solve our immediate problem to generate the $5.9 million which is the matching share of the $35 million Deer Creek project. It is essential that the private and public sectors make a commitment to resolve the area's long -range flood control problems within the next several months. In order to make certain that the long - range problems of our area are resolved, it is proposed that a • technical subcommittee be appointed to consider the following: -3- 4k. Pr eparation of a comprehensive benefit assessment district to be submitted to the electorate in the near future. 2. Preparation of a plan for financing operation and maintenance ' of the existing network of flood control facilities. 3. Preparation of a plan for the repayment of loans made by the County to the Flood Control District. while it is recognized that the short -term, Board - approved benefit assessment fails to provide a permanent, long-range solution to our problem, it is essential that we raise the $5.9 million. local •share in order to be certain that the $35 million Deer Creek fund- ing is not diverted to other areas of our nation. The various public agencies and the private sector must form a partnership to guarantee that our region retains the $35 million in funding which will help solve our flood control problems. The Deer Creek. _ improvements will solve recional flood control problems; therefore, it seems appropriate that the entire region work together to raise III the local matching share of the $5.9 million. x,.r I.. M ATTACNNENT IT CREDIT AGRECIEOr (CUCA11QNGA CREEK UIPROVCU:NT PROJECT) This Agreement, entered into as of the day of I9 , by and bs Oxen the FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN tlE KG RO L`:0, hereinafter referred to as "the District," and the persons and entitles identified in Exhibit "A" hereto, hereinafter sometimes joiotiy referred to as 'Land Owners," who have duly executed this Agreement, and ,rltnesseth as follows: T RECITALS 1, The District desires to continue the flood cun'rml project MOVn as the Cucamonga Creek Improvement Project by constructing the portion thereof generally referred to as Phase , vh ich Phase is hereinafter referred to m the "Project." 3. The Project is anticipated to coat approximately $40,000,000, of Mich apptoxlmat.ly $34,000,000 can he provided through gun's and contributions from the United States Army Corps of Engineers if the District can provide the remainder thereof as I's local share. J. The District lacks Mx,h.,te funds to provide far said local shat. wnthin the time periods repuired by the United States Amy COTpr of En ginea rs, and the fallow. �, the District to pnrvldo its share of the [bona ng for the project In a timely ma nnet could nxa l[ in a loss Of the Project irretrievably to the Oistrml. III E • C4QEr AGREEMENT Page 2 (Cucamonga Creek Improvement Project) • 4. In order to raise the necessary funds, the District contemplates the levy of a special benefit assessment pursuant to the provisions of I Covertment Code Section 60400, at seq. or some ether ssgassas nt proceeding or cambinatton thereof{ and the District anticipates raising approximately 5 therefrom. S. The Land Owners are willing to assist the D"trier in obtaining interim financing In order to assure the funding of the remaining $ necessary to meet the District obligations is respect to the Project. 6, The District desires to accept such interim financing from the Land Owners and to provide for the repayment thereof, subject to the tams • and conditions set forth hereinbelow, In light of the foregoing Recitals and in consideration of the mutual obligations Imposed herein, the parties agree as follows: lI OBLIGATIONS OF LAND OWNERS 1. The Land Owners Will establish or provide, not later than March ll, ^^ ^ 1982, in such bank, escrow, or other place mutually agreed upon by the parties, a (credit) In the amount of $ , or in such lessor armunt as the parties coy agree, upon which the District may us,., In its sole d/ic Teflon, but eobject to the conditions set forth In Article Ill. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Land Owners' obllgati.tn under this Section I shall be satisfied if the Land Owners enter lots agreements, satisfactory to the District and secured by f/ f6 7 I_..,._e - .. .. (Cucamenge Creek Improvement Project) security Instruments satisfactory to the District, pursuant to which the Land Owners .111 guaranty the payment of debt sery L<e on 5 -year tax exempt area to be issued by the District So as aggregate principal amount of oat earn than $ ; provided, bnvever, that In the event the District is unable to sell such notes after a diligent and good faith act ®pt to do so, the obligation of the land Owners under this Section I shall continue in full force and effect. Upon the mutual agreement of the parties, the obligation of the land Owners hereunder may also be satisfied by other methods of providing financing including, but Doe limited to, a ... Isman, district proceedings pursuant to provisions of the Streets and Highways Code Sections 5000 at seq. or Sections 10000 at seq., nonprofit corporation lease- lasseback financing, and joint powers authority financing. 3. land Owners hereby waive all right to protest, object to, or bring action against the District in relation to, any levy or assessment Imposed by the District upon property interests of [and Mars to fund the obligation of the land ovners under Section t hereof at this Article 11. —A vd +...... ). land Owners .ill cooperate with the District and other public and private entitles and persons to define and Implement a long -ranga prngres for protection of persons and property within the area surrounded by the Project. • . n•�Ya..nur ler . M E CREDIT ACRECIE4T Page 4 (Cucamonga Creek Improvement Project) • III CONDIT104S TO USE OF CREDIT District may draw against, or otherwise make use of, the credit estiblished Pursuant to Section I of Article II hereof, only under the following conditions; 1, Unlea such credit has been supplied rbra.,h tax exempt financing, it may be used or drawn agatrst on until June 80, 1982. 2. District most have made and exhausted aver, reasonable effort to defer the payment of its local ature of the Project to a point in time Men the assistance of Land Owners would not be necessary. 0. District must have used and exhausted every reasonable effort to • reduce the costs of the Project as that Land Owners' assistance would be reduc:d or become Donee.... ry. L, prior to drawing upon or otherwise wing the assistance made avallable by Land Owners, District most have used all other funds available m it for fondle, the Project. IY OBLIGATIONS of DISTRICT I. To t1m extent that Land Owners have paid monies to the District, or ha.'e becc-t obttpated to third parties for the payment of monies, pursuant to this A,reemenq the District vill repay such amounts to Land Owners In accordance with the following terms: a. Repayment ahau he made nor later than Itoa (5) years It cn the date at which the payrcntt was �• made at the /obligation incurred by C8]lii AGRK!MENi Pige $ (Cwcamongs Creek Improvement Project) the Land Owners, provided, however, that with the consent of the Lnd Owner., District may assum any third patty obligations tncurred by Land Owners pursuant to this Agreement. b. All each amounts shall bear interest at the maximum legal Interest rate in effect at the time such payment was made or obligation incurred. C. At the time at which District drays upon or otherwise uses the credit established by land Ducar. pursuant to this Agreement, it shall famish to Lnd owners its prmmilswry note to repay any payments advanced at much time, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit R. sad shall pledge to Lnd Owners at web time any and all relmbor.ements of its local share of the Project received by the District from any source (Alternate l: After June 30, 1982) (Alternate 2: After this agreement has been entered into). said repayment to be vmdo within 30 days after race fit by the District. 2. District will cooperate with Lnd Owners and other public and private entities and persons to define and implement a ling -range program for praise Hon of persons and property within the area ..rued by the Project. implementation shall include, but shall not be limited to, con,ucting ..uch proceedin, and ale ctSans as may be necessary to establish a benefit assessment or other program to fund c mpletlan of she Project. 1. (Alterna,Wa is District will cemrence and use all reasonable efforts to reach A favorable conclusion in asses n,entTJ district pmce<dings and r&7 I ) me 11 Ckl01r AGREESEVr Page 6 (cucawnga creek le"ovesser Project) • benefit assessment to 11.11. proceedings putsoant goverment code Sections 60400 and fallowing, in order to sake unnecessary, if possible, the financial assistance to be provided by Land- Owners pursuant to the Agre<menq. ( Alrernative 3: no District shall levy an assessment on each parcel of real property within gone I of the District on a basis which will yield revenues to the District frees the developed property withio said I Zane 1 of not less than $4 million. The failure of the District to levy such ao sssessxne by $eptenbec 1, 1981, r the reseiasion of said lay by the District or a termination by a court of camps rent Jurisdiction that said levy is invalid, shall reliae the Land Owners v • of any rnd all of the olblgations under the Agreement.) (Alternative a: A recital to be inserted saying that the obligation of the Land Owners under a B.A.P. would not &acted the difference between $1.9 Billion and any credit mad pu cauan, to this Agrement.) 4. The District will use all reasonable efforts to persuade local goverment agencies with the power to do an, to impose developoent r^ fees upon land Mich has not contributed its equitable share imposed by the pr ag awns envisioned by this Agreement., S. District will cooperate In good faith with the Land Owners, at the option of the Land Owners, in the implementation of any of the alternative methods of financing permitted pursuant to the provisions of Section 1 of Article 11 hereto, unless the District shall have reaso nabfy dueled such alternate nm thud of financing eaold not be effactuaud prior to June 70, 1983. )71 � age , (Cucawanga Creek Improvement Project) V HISCFJ.LANEC DS 1. Any provision hereof to the contrary notwithstanding, the obligations of the land Owners hereof shall be several to each land Owner (and not joint Ana, the LA,ul owners) In the amount set forth after the name of each land Owner in Exhibit A hevete. 2. Any notices aM /or, payments required or permitted to he made her ... det shall he deemad to have been delivered when deposited in United States mail, posrege prepaid, addressed as fellow.: To the District: SAN BERRARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 825 Fast Third Street San Bar mrdine, CA 92415 To the land Owner: At the respective addresses set forth In Exhibit A hereto. However, any of the parties hereto may from time to tine, by notice to the other parties, designate a new address or payee. AI 17.21 • • • RESOLUTION NO. 51-4?6 A RESOLUTION OF TILE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SUPPORTING THE DEER CREEK FINANCING PROGRAM OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY WHEREAS, the continuation of the Deer Creek segments of the Cucamonga Creek Improvement Project is vital to health, safety and economic stability of the residents of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the Project is anticipated to cost $40,000.00 of which approximately $14,000.00 can be provided through grants and contributions from the United States Army Corp of Engineers if the County Flood Control District can provide the remainder thereof as its local share; and WHEREAS, the Flood Control District lacks adequate funds to provide said local share within the time periods required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, and the failure of the District to pro- vide its share of the financing could result in the loss of the Project • irretrievably to the City and the District; and WHEREAS, the City officials comprising Zone 1 of the Flood Control District and major land owners within the watershed have met with County Representatives in a strong cooperative effort to develop the funds needed to save the project; and WHEREAS, those officials and land owners have reached general agreement on such a program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That it strongly supports a program to save funding for the Deer Creek Channel and recommends to the Board of of Supervisors of San Bernardino County adopt the following program to develop said funding: A one -time benefit assessment to raise $4 million of the required $5.9 million matcVng share. The $4 million dollars would be raised by /$5 per unit assessment in the Zone 1 areas outside the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario. The cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario would be subject to an approximately $30 benefit assessment. The balance of the monies to be raied by written agreements from major property owners in the watershed. That no assessment for vacant and agricultural properties be levied but that in the future, development fees be considered by the Flood Control District for areas which 177 RESOLUTION NO. have major Flood Control drainage problems. That a Zone 1 Committee be created to consider pre- paration of a future comprehensive benefit assessment program to be submitted to the Zone 1 electorate in the near future which would include the financing of Maintenance and Operations, emergency repairs and repayment of loans. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED THIS 17 day of June, 1981. AYES: NOTES: ASSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk I?q Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor Ll • • • 1 QTY OF RANCM CL)CAW N(',A STAFF REPORT June 11, 1981 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman I City Manager SUBJECT: Contractural Services for Gilbert Aja and Assoc. G�'Cn,4ighc s � C a U > 1977 The City Council has requested additional information regarding the probable costs for the preliminary work which is necessary in connection with the civic center /law and justice center project. At our last meeting, we recommended that the Council consider employment of Mr. Gilbert Aja and Associates to handle the preliminary work which consists of preliminary planning of space needs and the preparation of schematic site designs. Essentially the archi- tecture for the civic center would be provided in three distinct phases. Phase I involves the preliminary programming, research, and planning in order to ade- quately protect the City's interest in working jointly with the County to develop a site design for the civic center /law and justice center. In addition to the schematic site work, this Phase would also include facility designs to insure that the site plan adequately addresses the specific requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Phase II includes design development of the city hall., council chambers, and possibly the police facilities. Phase III includes the preparation of working drawings, specifications, and other details necessary in order to proceed with construction. ' The most important phase of the proposed project is the preparation of the schematic design studies to illustrate the scale and the relationship of the various project components to the 25.5 acre site. This work will entail: I. Site exposure 2. Interface of City and County land use, visual impact, and functions 3. Project image 4. Vehicular and predestrian circulation 5. Massing and organization of building clusters 6. Parking criteria 7. Drainage systems 8. Utility distribution 9. Conceptual organization of City functions I�� City Council • Re. Contractural Services Juue 11, 1981 Page 2 It is important to note that the work required for Phase I of the total pro- ject can be handled by any architectural firm. We have recommended Mr. Aja, however, because of his previous involvement with the City. There is no specific commitment to employ Mr, Aja for either or both Phases II and III of the project. The Council will have the option of interviewing other architects if you so choose to complete the design and construction management phases of the project. It is anticipated that the maximum cost for Phase I of the project will be approximately $9,500. Work will be billed on an hourly basis. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council contract with Gilbert Aja and Associates to handle the Phase I work in connection with the planning and site design of the civic center at a cost not to exceed $9,500. LMW:baa 17 • E v V 0 23117 PLAZA POWTE DR SUITE )OQ LAGUNA FILLS CA42653 (714)770 -2824 PROPOSAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR CIVIC CENTER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GILBERT AJA 6' ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC. 23117 Plaza Pointe Drive Laguna Hills, CA 92653 (714) 770 -2829 May 29, 1981 Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Mr. Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9340 Baseline, Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Civic Center, City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Lauren and Jim: It is with enthusiasm and pleasure that Gilbert Aja S Associates submit this statement of qualifications to provide architectural services for the proposed City Hall in the future Civic Center at the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park. Gilbert Aja a Associates is a multi - disciplined design firm with specialization in architecture, land planning, urban design, and programming research. Emphasis is on direct principal involvement in all project phases insuring complete control over the full scope of services and to insure a com- plete client - effective design product. The firm has extensive experience in both owner /user and developer based projects. Current projects range from mid -rise and low -rise office buildings to institutional, hotels, cunmercial, industrial, recreational, and large -scale land planning. Our firm has worked on projects in many parts of the country and is licensed in four states. We stand apart from many i Mr. Lauren Wasserman Mr. Jim Robinson Play 29, 1981 Page Two architectural firms because of some very important general principles that are the basis of our firm's philosophy. Service to our clients is our prime consideration. our belief that good design is a result of a systematic pro- cess of recognizing and responding to our client's needs. Our firm has grown not only through quality design, but _ through a realistic approach to project costs and design service. We are successful in maintaining our strong list of clients through understanding costs, the ability to design economic structural systems and our understanding of a developed project budget and the capability of keeping within established fiscal planning. EXPERIENCE My personal involvement with Civic Centers dates back to CON CO' 1973 when I was one of the designers of the much - acclaimed Civic Center for the City of E1 Cajon. Phase I construction included a City Hall, Council Chambers, Civic Auditorium, and Plaza development. _ Two major elements of the planning criteria used for this project that have relevance to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Civic Center are the following: 1. Design an environment for the Civic Center which will influence the total community's future development, park -like setting, and human scale. ., 2. Create a focus for all community activities and introduce elements imbuing the center with life and activity and make the public buildings and open spaces useful for special events such as festivals and displays. Mr. Lauren sserman Mr. Jim Ro son May 29, 19pp Page Three ENERGY MANAGEMENT Gilbert Aja s Associates is dedicated to providing energy- conscious design and is willing to commit all resources to provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with an energy- efficient project. My dedication to efficient energy use is best exemplified by a 30,000 square foot clubhouse and recreational facility which I designed for Leisure World in Laguna Hills. Club- house V was one of the first major solar- heated projects in Southern California. The project has received various architectural awards including the Pacific Coast Builder's Conference Gold Nugget Award for the best recreational project for that year. The facility included a large commercial kitchen able to feed 750 diners in 20 minutes. The kitchen was designed so that it could handle enough �.7. to serve as a theater of performing arts with close circuit television and video tape potential, and an accoustical and sound system design that would allow the hall to be divided into smaller rooms. The facility also included various craft and meeting rooms, card rooms, billiard rooms, a solar- heated swimming pool and locker facilities. Our current and recently completed projects employ the elements of solar heating, natural daylighting, natural ventilation, use of indirect high - pressure sodium lighting and passive solar heating. THE TEAM We have assembled an experienced and well - qualified team which .. provides the interdisciplinary compliment of skills and ex- perience needed to develop a workable, practical and attain- able project for you. Our team has demonstrated the ability to successfully work together to manage and execute complex Mr. Lauren Wasserman Mr. Jim Robinson May 29, 1981 Page Pour consultant team projects that have involved a close working relationship with a multiplicity of agencies. I have committed myself to be personally involved during every phase of the project and to commit all our resources to provide you with a technically sound facility, completed on time and within budget. I would be pleased to answer any questions you may have and am looking forward to working with you on this project. Respectfully yours, GILBERT AJA 6 ASSOCIATES �.� ARCHTGT33C , INC G Q' d Gilber Pja, A Presider • El SCOPPE 01 SERVICES SUMMARY OF APPROACH GILBERT AJA & ASSOCIATES will cooidinate all major tasks involved in the design and development of the Civic Center for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Our suggested scope of services has been divided into three major phases: Phase One involves the necessary programming, research and planning required to adequately protect the City's interest in interfacing with the County in the development of a schematic site design. This phase would also include schematic facility design to insure that the site plan ade- quately addresses and provides for the specific requirements of the City of Cucamonga. Phase Two includes design development of the _ City Hall, Council Chambers and Police Facility. Phase Three would include the preparation of -� working d ings and specifications describing in technical detail, the construction work to be done. This phase also includes the administration of the Construction Contract and the protection of the City's interest during construction. SCOPE OF SERVICES Phase One - Preliminary Planning Research & Schematic Site Design Purpose: Identification of factors which will influence planning and development of the site. Task Outline: A) Define major issues as well as goals and objectives which may effect development. B) General reseaI=ch and analysis of project requirements: - Political /jurisdictional - Economic /financial - Physical /environmental - Programmatic Concepts - - Preliminary space require- ments and relationships - C) Work study sessions with City team members and respresentatives from the County as re- quired. D) Preparation of schematic design studies illustrating the scale and relationship of project components and the preparation of a schematic site design for the entire - 25.5 acre site. _ The following areas will be considered: (� 1. Site exposure. 2. Interface of City and County land use, visual impact and functions. 3. Project image. 9. Vehicular and pedestrian - circulation. 5. Massing and organization of building clusters. ' 6. Parking criteria. 7. Drainage systems. 8. Utility distribution. 9. Conceptial organization of city functions. Phase Two: Design Development Purpose: Develop and analyze the preliminary sketch plans. Task Outline: A) Development of- schematic and design studies and the preparation of detailed drawings relating to building appearance and structure, mechanical, solar and electrical systems. B) Establish budget and determine probable construction costs. • Phase Three: Construction Document Phase Task Outline; Al Preparation from approved preliminary documents working drawings and specifications setting forth in detail the requirements of construction work to be done. B) Preparation of bidding documents and obtaining the approval of governmental agencies having jurisdiction over project. v� C) Coordination and.interface with representa- tives from the county. D) Administration of the construction contract, including visits to the site to review progress and quality of work. Time and Allocati and Proposed Budget* • Phase One: Preliminary Plan:fing 6 Schematic Site Design 2 months $ 9,500 Phase Two: Design Development 2 months Fixed Fee Phase Three: Construction Documents 4 months Fixed Fee Construction Administration 12 months Fixed Fee *Note: At this time it is difficult to . assess accurately how much time will be necessary to complete Phase One to your approval. However, for your accounting purposes and based on the experience - of other projects, we estimate that an amount of approximately $9,500 should cover the accrued time and budget requirements. lPhase Two and Phase Three would be a negotiated fixed fee. The fee cannot be determined until �] the scope and size of the City Facility has been determined. Hourly rates for Phase One shall be the following: Principal $55.00 hour . Project Architect . Senior Designer Senior Planner $45.00 hour Senior Draftsperson Designer $40.00 hour - Draftsperson $35.00 hour Clerical $18.00 hour i. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM June 5, 1981 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT: Civic Center A c tect We are enclosing two documents which we have received from Gilbert Aja and Associates. Mr. Aja is currently employed by the Daon Corporation to work with the city; however, at the time the property actually changes hands, we will have to make a decision concerning the architecture. I feel quite confident at this point in using Mr. Aja to determine our preliminary space needs and to work with the County architects to prepare a site plan which is acceptable to both the City and the County. Selection of architects to handle the actual design and construction should be done by a committee consisting of staff and city council. Tha, stage, however, is sommahat later in the process. I think you will agree after reading the materials concerning the preliminary space program that Mr. Aja is quite well prepared and is capable to handling the preliminary phases of the program. The work required in connection with the preliminary planning and schematic site design is estimated at approximately $9,500. While that is a substantial amount of money, it is in line for fees normally charged for that type of work. This stage takes considerable amount of time as does the design phase and the pre- paration of construction documents. One part of the proposal which pleases me is the fact that the architect is willing to work for a fixed fee. Most architects would rather work on a percentage and as change orders occur, they receive a percentage of the cost increases. Please review the materials. Either Jim or I will be available to discuss them with you prior to our meeting on the 17th. It is important that we make some type of decision concerning the preliminary architectural services since it is probable that beginning July 1st we will be on our own and will not be finances by the Daon Corporation.for any architectural services rendered. LM'A: baa cc: Jim Robinson Jack Lam attach: letter, June 2 booklet I� 0 June 2, 1981 Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Mr. Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9340 Baseline, Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173' RE; PRELIMINARY SPACE PROGRAM / CITY HALL Dear Lauren and Jim: The following list of questions and space functions are representative of the type of information required from each city department and administrator. • Also required would be an organizational chart of the city government functions and employee population (both present and future, year 2000). I have also included a list of typical departments and functions in a city hall which might be useful as a checklist. If your people would like to take a stab at space re- lationship diagrams, they would be most helpful. (See enclosed example) SPACE / FUNCTIONS / RELATIONSHIPS - Questions for each department: 1. Private office required? r1 tJ a) Private toilet b) Private exit P) Direct access to conference room - (Private or shared s by whom) d) Secretary - (Private or shared 6 by whom) e) Receptionist - (Private or shared 6 by whom) 23117 PLAZA PONE DR • 3LAlE 100 • LAGUNA HILLS CA92653 • (714)770 -2829 l q? Mr. Lauren Wasserman Mr. Jim Robinson June 2, 1981 Page Two • SPACE /FUNCTIONS /RELATIONSHIPS (Continued) 2. Assistants: a) Number s Organizational Chart b) Private offices required (See previous list) c) Open work space with low partitions 3. Reception area s adjacent relationships 4. Work area (requirements s adjacent relationships) 5. Meeting rooms 6. Library (shared and by whom ?) 7. Conference rooms (shared and by whom ?) 8. Storage requirements 9. Vault requirements (shared and by whom ?) 10. Kitchen facilities • 11. Employee Lounge / lunch area 12. Record storage (active and inactive) 13. Warehouse requirements 14. Locker s shower rooms 15. Recreation / Physical Exercies Room General Questions: a) What areas require open to general public? b) What areas require direct outside access? c) Are Conference and Meeting Rooms used by public or staff only? • �Z) Mr. Lauren Wasserman Mr. Jim Robinson June 2, 1981 . Page Three TYPICAL CITY DEPARTMENTS: CITY HALL & COUNCIL CHAMBERS Iq 1. City Manager & Staff 2. The Mayor 3. City Council 4. Planning Commissioners 5. Annexation Department 6. Attorney 7. Building & Safety Administrative Division Plan Check Division Building Inspection Division Housing Division 8. City Clerk 9. Civil Defense 10. Civil Service 11. Council Chambers & support facilities 12. Data Processing Administration . Data Control Section Data Preparation Section Systems & Program'g Section Computer Operation Section 13. Engineering Administration. Design & Drafting Division Assessment & Right of Way Survey & Inspection Division Traffic Engineering 14. Electrical 15. Finance Department Administration Accounting Purchasing Central Services Data Processing 16. Parks & Recreation Administration Parks Division Recreation Division 17. Police Department, Licenses 18. Personnel 19. Planning Administration Current Planning Iq Mr. Lauren Wasserman Mr. Jim Robinson June 2, 1981 Page Four • TYPICAL CITY DEPARTMENTS (Continued) Graphic Services Advance Planning 20. Public Buildings 21. Refuse Disposal 22. Street 23. Treasurer Administration Cashier 29. Water Department Administration Financial Division Admin. Section Customer Svc. Section Accounting Section Records Section Billing Section Total Fin. Division Engineering Division Total Water Department 25. Employee Lounge / Lunch Area 26. Staple Supply Storage (Civil Defense) • 27. Inactive Record Storage II. POLICE FACILITY If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, GILBERT AJA S ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC. Gilbert Aja, AIA President GA:ha Enc. • 0 Example: u 9 SPACE RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM �v May 12, 1981 Job No. 8042 Mr. Lauren Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Professional Sevices City Hall Facility Dear Lauren: • 1 am looking forward to working with you and your staff on your very exciting project. We anticipate close coordination with you and our team. This close coordination and your • review of the work progress on an ongoing basis will insure a successful project. As per our discussion and with your approval, we will proceed with the following course of action: 1. Until the subject property is actually purchased by the County /City, our services will continue to be paid for by Daon Corporation. 2. At the consummation of the land purchase by the County/ City, Gilbert Aja S Associates will then come under contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga on an hourly basis until the program and scope of the project is fixed. 3. Upon the approval of the program, we shall submit for your review a fixed fee proposal for complete architectural services. • 23117 PLAZA PONTE DR • SUITE 100 • LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 • (714)770 -2829 Mr. Lauren Wasserman May 12, 1981 Page Two I£ the above scenario meets with your approval, please sign and return one copy of this letter for our files. Sincerely, GILBERT S ASSOCIATES NC.. 10 7GA/md A Enclosure • Approved this ` day of CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 6D By: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager 'r1�5 CITY OF RANCHO CLUANIOVGA STAIT REPORT DATE: June 17, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager UL 12; 6: 1977 FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN Please find attached a copy of the preliminary work program and time schedule for the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The entire work program co- vers a period of about 16 months, with the bulk of the work to be ac- complished over a 9;--morth span. The remaining months are for the Environmental Impact Report posting period and public hearing schedule. Should the plan require fewer public hearings, the total timeframe can be reduced significantly. During the formulation phases of the plan Staff proposes to work with a Citizens Advisory Committee appointed by the City Council. Such a committee can provide valuable input and assistance. In order to be workable and effective, the size of the committee should be small. Staff suggests a committee of nine to eleven members, one of which would be a representative from the City Council, one from the Planning • Commission, and one from the Eitwanda Citizens Advisory Commission. The rest should be a balance between homeowner interests and development/ business interests. Staff anticipates that these Advisory Committee meetings will follow a regular once -a -month schedule with additional in- between meetings when necessary. Toward the end of the process the review responsibilities of the plan will shift to the Planning Commission and finally, to the City Council. In order to keep both the Planning Commission and City Council informed of the progress of the plan, all reports to the Advisory Committee will be made available to both the Commission and the Council. The Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary project schedule and work tasks and has recommended the same to the City Council. It should be noted that the Planning Commission emphasized the need for a workable timeframe such as the one proposed rather than an unreal- istic one. RECVMPIDATION: It is recommended that the City Council; 1) review the preliminary scope of work and provide the necessary staff direc- tion; and, 2) select a Citizens Advisory Committee for the planning project. Res)eactf 1 submitted, r LAM, D ec Community Development Attachment: Preliminary Work Program (, • 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PRELIMINARY WORK PROGRAM �nraum, not C[Plannur Etiwanda Specific Plan lsl 989 -1851 x254 1�7 PRELIMINARY WORK PROGRAM June July august Sept Oct nOy dec jan feb I '- 11981 INTRO PHASE Ii 0 TASK 1: PROJECT FORMAT DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: This phase conbines a number of necessary preliminaries to develop an administrative and technical framework for the preparation of a Specific Plan for the Etiwania area, and includes gathering of background information, and preparation of a scope of work by Staff. Also included is the appointment of a Citizen Advisory Com- mittee by the City Council to provide Staff with direction and feedback during the Specific Plan formulation process. SUBTASKS: 1.1 Identify Local and State Requirements 1.2 Prepare Scope of Work 1.3 Prepare a work program outlining specific time requirements 1.4 City Council appoints a Citizens Advisory Committee • WORK PRODUCT: a. Scope of Work b. Preliminary Work Program ) G E TASK 2: DATA GATHERING AND ISSUE IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION: During this phase, Staff will conduct a number of recon- naissance surveys and collect all available data. Staff will also conduct an informal excursion of the project areas with members of the CAC, to identify various areas of concern. In addition, two CAC meetings will be held to define and formalize the issues. SUBTASKS: 2.1 Identify and collect all data and references to be considered during the preparation of the Specific Plan 2.1.1 Conduct reconnaissance surveys of the project areas 2.1.2 Gather information and data available through various City and County departments, special districts and other regional or state agencies 2.2 Organize available data if a form usable in subsequent tasks 2.2.1 Prepare base maps at a community scale to show land uses, • circulation, parks, schools, trails and other community facilities, parcelization, location of existing resources and opportunities as well as issue areas, etc. 2.2.2 Prepare charts, graphics and tables to organize and present data not suitable for use in map form. 2.3 Conduct CAC meetings to gain insight into the various issues and how they are perceived by the community, and to define those issues to be addressed by the Specific Plan. PARTICIPATION: Two Citizens Advisory Committee meetings WORK PRODUCTS: a. Base maps, indicating existing conditions in graphic form b. Listing of issues and policy considerations Pi aoa 0 19 TASK 3: WORK PROGRAM REFINEMENT DESCRIPTION: Staff will revise the preliminary work program and schedule in accordance with the relative emphasis to be given to various issues identified in TASK 2 as they relate to available data. SUBTASKS: 3.1. Formalize all issues to be addressed by the Specific Plan 3.2 Analyze preliminary work program in light of issues to be addressed by the Specific Plan. 3.2.1 Analyze available data and identify any gaps and areas of insufficient information. 3.2.2 Assess need for additional data gathering, graphics and research. 3.3 Revise work program as appropriate, with emphasis shifted to high priority issues. WORK PRODUCT: Report formalizing those issues to be addressed by the Specific Plan Revised Work Program TASK 4: DEVELOPMENT AND SELECTION OF BASIC OPTIONS • DESCRIPTION: Development and formulation of objectives responsive to the issues identified in TASK 2. (For the purposes of this project, an objective is defined as a statement of intent to deal with a particular issue or problem.) Once these objectives are formulated based on Citizens Advisory Committee and Community input to date, a number of specific options for resolving each issue will be developed. Sets of compatible options will then be combined to form a limited number of alternatives to address the issues in a systematic and comprehensive manner. The alternatives, or sets of compatible options, will next be analyzed and evaluated, and will become the basis for the preliminary Specific Plan. SUBTASKS: 4.1 Formulation of Objectives 4.2 Development of Basic Alternatives 4.2.1 Development of options to deal with single issue problems 4.2.2 Selection of sets of compatible options to form several basic project alternatives. 4.3 Evaluation and analysis of basic alternatives. (This subtask will • also provide data for inclusion in the required EIR selection on Project Alternatives.) PARTICIPATION: Two regular meetings of the Citizens Advisory Committee to clarify objectives, to discuss options, and to develop basic alternatives. WORK PRODUCTS: Report on Options and Basic Alternatives • v- s SUBTASK 5: FINAL WORK PROGRAM REFINEMENT DESCRIPTION: Staff will analyze the work program in accordance with potential alternatives and will prepare a final work program focusing on those alternatives. WORK PRODUCT: Final Work Program • 16 TASK 6: PRELIMINARY PLAN FORMULATION DESCRIPTION: Staff will begin formulation of the Specific Plan, based on alternatives and options selected, addressing the following areas of concern: 1. Location and development standards of any conmercial areas. 2. Subarea vehicular circulation and public /private street system standards. 3. Location and development standards for Darks, schools, trails, and related facilities, consistent with the General Plan. 4. Policies and standards for community character identification. 5. Land use adjustments and appropriate design and development standards for transition and other special concern areas. At this stage, the materials presented to the Citizens Advisory Committee will consist mainly of sketch quality maps, charts and details to facilitate discus- sion and analysis. All proposals will be presented in a form that is easily adaptable to chance. Once formulated, a progress report and the preliminary plan will be presented to the Planning Commission for comment and confirmation of the project direction. (A hearino on the contents of the proposed EIR, as required by law, will be held concurrently.) SUBTASKS: 6.1 Develop informal presentation format utilizing base maps, charts and sketch plans for the purpose of discussion and analysis of project proposals. 6.2 Begin formulation of preliminary Plan proposals. 6.2.1 Prepare presentation of preliminary proposals to Citizens Advisory Committee 6.2.2 Revise preliminary proposals in consideration of Citizens Advisory Committee feedback. 6.3 Present a progress report on the preliminary Plan to the Planning Commission 0 PARTICIPATION: Three meetings of the Citizens Advisory Committee, (Should additional meetings be necessary or desired, bi- monthly schedule is suggested for this phase.) One Planning Commission meeting. • WORK PRODUCTS: Specific Plan Progress Report Preliminary Plan Proposals to include text and maps Draft Specific Plan Outline • n goy • TASK 7: DRAFT EIR PREPARATION DESCRIPTION: This task will coomence with the determination by the Planning Commission of areas of potential adverse environmental impacts which may occur as a result of imolementation of the Specific Plan. Staff will then prepare a Draft EIR, focusing on those areas. Once completed, the draft document will be made available to other agencies and the general public for review and comment. SUBTASKS: 7.1 Determine content of EIR based on content and scope of preliminary plan, and on other legal requirements. 7.1.1 Prepare an Initial Study to identify potential adverse impacts. 7.1.2 Prepare a Notice of Preparation to invite public comment and Responsible Agency responses. 7.1.3 Conduct a public hearing by Planning Commission to determine focus of the EIR. 7.2 Prepare Draft Environmental Impact Report with focus on areas of concern as determined in Subtask 7.1. • 7.2.1 Prepare Draft EIR sections, as required 7.2.2 Prepare Notice of Completion commencing 45 day review and comment period. 0 PARTICIPATION: One Planning Commission hearing a. Responsible Agency comment invited through Notice of Preparation. b. Public comment invited through Notice of Public Hearing. WORK PRODUCTS: Initial Study Notice of Preparation Draft Environmental Impact Report with Appendices Notice of Completion PD5 TASK 8: PREPARATION OF DRAFT SPECIFIC PLAN DESCRIPTION: Staff will prepare a draft of the Specific Plan based on Citizens Advisory Committee input and Planning Commission comments. Compared to the Preliminary Plan (TASK 6), the draft will be formally structured and will not be as easily adaptable to change. It is anticipated that during this stage, the Citizens Advisory Committee will have reached a concensus on major policy issues and will now con- centrate on the inter - relationships of the various elements of the Plan. The Draft Plan will consist of two major sections; Part I, Policies and Concepts, will describe specific approaches to dea rng wit partrcu ar pro ems or issues. For example, this section will determine location and scope of oroposed commercial facilities and their relationship to surrounding land uses. However, specific development standards, such as height, bulk, setbacks, signage and landscaping, etc., will be de- scribed in Part II, Implementation. This may be accomplished by both the development of new standards tailored for the area, and by refer- ences to existing ordinances where appropriate. Part II, Implementation will also incorporate appropriate mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report prepared under TASK 7. SUBTASKS: L 8.1 Prepare drafts of all necessary elements for the Policy Section • of the Specific Plan 8.1.1 Land Use, with focus on location and policies for any commercial areas. 8.1.2 Vehicular circulation, with emphasis on subarea circulation and policies for public and private local streets. 8.1.3 Open space and cormunity facilities, with emphasis on the location and policies for parks, schools,. hiking and riding trails and related facilities. 8.1.4 Community character focusing on policies formulating urban design concepts and guidelines for future development of the Etiwanda Community. 8.1.5 Relationship of the Specific Plan to the City's General Plan, with references and policy guidelines for those areas not directly addressed by the Specific Plan. 8.2 Prepare draft of the ta Section of the Specific Plan, outling specific standards, guidelines and implementation measures to carry out provisions outlined under Subtask 8.1. 8.2.1 Precise development standards including a list of permitted uses, height, bulk, setback, siting, density, landscaping and signage requirements, procedures for Development Review and processing, with references to other applicable City standards. J y'J /_1 TASK 8 • PAGE TWO 8.2.2 Specific standards for public and private streets and roadways, including access, siting and sidewalk standards 8.2.3 Specific standards and implementation techniques for devel- opment, preservation, and utilization of open spaces, parks, schools, biking, hiking and riding trails, and related faci- lities. 8.2.4 Community Character standards and development guidelines, dealing with Community Design and identity. 8.2.5 Relationship of the Specific Plan implementation section to the City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, with specific references to applicable sections. PARTICIPATION: Planning Commission and Citizens Advisory Committee input to date. Three Citizens Advisory Committee meetings are anticipated, WORK PRODUCTS: Draft Etiwanda Specific Plan, in formal form, consisting of two parts: a. Part I, Policies and Concepts • b. Part II, Implementation 9 0 7 TASK 9: FINAL EIR PREPARATION DESCRIPTION: Staff will consider all comments received on the draft EIR and will prepare responses and revisions as may be appropriate. The final EIR will next be forwarded to the Planning Commission and the City Council for approval and certification. SUBTASKS: 9.1 Prepare Preliminary Final EIR 9.1.1 Consider all convents received and prepare responses 9.1.2 Include all comments and responses in an addendum, and forward to Planning Commission, along with re- ommended changes as may be appropriate. 9.2 Complete Final EIR 9.2.1 Revise document as recommended by the Planning Commission 9.2.2 Forward final EIR to the City Council for review and cer- tification 9.2.3 Prepare Notice of Determination PARTI6IPATION: a. 45 day review by general public and Responsible Agencies • b. Planning Commission /Public Hearings - (2 to 3 meetings anticipated) C. City Council /Public Hearings - (1 to 2 meetings anticipated) WORK PRODUCTS: a. Final Environmental Impact Report, with Appendices b. Notice of Determination C1 L�DZ7 TASK 10: COMPLETION AND ADOPTION OF SPECIFIC PLAN DESCRIPTION: Staff will present the Draft Specific Plan to the Planning Commission for review and public hearing, and will revise the plan according to Planning Commission requests. (3 -4 Planning Commission hearings are anticipated). Once cleared by the Commission, the Specific Plan will be presented to the City Council for review, potential revisions, and adoption (2 -3 City Council hearings are anticipated). SUBTASKS: 10.1 Prepare Final Specific Plan 10.1.1 Present draft to the Planning Commission for public hearing, review and torment 10.1.2 Revise document to incorporate all changes requested by the Planning Commission as a result of public hearings 10.1.3 Obtain approval of the final Specific Plan by the Planning Commi s s i on 10.2 Facilitate Adoption of Specific Plan 10.2.1 Present Specific Plan to the City Council for public hearing, O review and comment 10.2.2 Revise document as requested by City Council 10.2.3 City Council adoption of an Ordinance approving the Etiwanda Specific Plan PARTICIPATION: General Public 3 -4 Planning Commission Hearings 2 -3 City Council Hearings WORK PRODUCT: Adopted Specific Plan �� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TRACT NO. 11428 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and of the applicable ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and nata nag Laboratories , hereinafter referred (o as the Su Sdivider. WITNESSETH: THAT, WIPERS, said Subdivider desires to subdivide certain real property in said City as shown on the previously approved Tentative Map of Tract No. 11428 t and, WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Subdivider as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract by said City; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Subdivider as follows: t. The Subdivider hereby agrees to construct at Subdivider's expense all improvements described on Page 5 hereof within twenty -four months from the date hereof. 2. This agreement shall run for a period of one year from the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving said Final Map and this agreement. figs agreement shall be in default on the day following the second anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 3. The Subdivider may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to the City in writing not less than 4 Wks weeks before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circum stances necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 4. If the Subdivider fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Subdivider and /or his surety the full cost and expense incurred. 5. The Subdivider shall provide metered water service to each lot on said Tract in accordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Water District. 6. Utility- Deposit - Statement. Subdivider shall file with the City Engineer, prior to the commencement of any work to be performed within the areas described by said map, a written statement signed by Subdivider, and each public utility corporation involved, to the effect that Subdivider has made the deposit legally required by such public utility corporation for the connection of any and all public utilities to be supplied by such Corporation within such subdivision. 7. The Subdivider shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of Such water system. IMPRDVEYENT AGREEMENT TRACT NO. _ PAGE 2 8. Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvements Plan approved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Said improvements One tabulated on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated on page 5 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number. The Subdivider shall also bus responsible for construction of any transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage. 9. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Subdivider from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section shall be subje:t to the penalties provided therefor. 10. The Subdivider shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining said Tract resulting from development work relative to said Tract. 11. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion. 12. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Subdivider after other improvement work, grading, and cleanup has been completed. planting shall be done as provided by ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Development Director in all locations where the adjoining lot has been completely developed and built upon. Data Design the Subdivider shall be re- sponsiTTor maintammng a Tf trees p anted in good health until the end of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is later. 13. The Subdivider is responsible for meeting all conditions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City ordinances, and this agreement for the Tract, and for the maintenance of all improvements constructed there- under until the Tract is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no im- provement security provided herewith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall net terminate until the maintenance guarantee bond here- inafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the Subdivider herein named, and by resolution of the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security therefor has been released. 15. The improvements security to be furnished by the Subdivider with this agreement shall consist of the following, and shall be approved by the City Attorney: A, A faithful performance guarantee bond assuring completion by the Sub- divider of all conditions prerequisite to acceptance of the Tract by the City. D. A material and lobar payment guarantee bond assuring payment in full by the Subdivider for all materials, services, equipment rentals, and labor furnished to the Subdivider in the course of meeting the conditions of this agreement. C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Subdivider to the tract engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Tract Man for the setting of all tract boundary, lot corner, and street center- line mounrents and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the tract engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond estimate contained herein. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TRACT NO. — PAGE 3 Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as procedure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment in full from the tract engineer or surveyor. D. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 4 of this agreement. 16. The Subdivider warrants that the improvements described in this agreement shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship. Any and all portions of the improvements found to be defective within one (1) year following the date on which the improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by subdivider free of all charges to the City. The Subdivider shall furnish a maintenance guarantee bond in a sun equal to five percent (5;) of the con- struction estimate of S20O.00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful performance of Subdivider's obligations as described in this paragraph. The maintenance guarantee bonds shall also secure the faithful performance by the Subdivider of any obligation of the Subdivider to do specified work with respect to any parkway maintenance assessment district. Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee bond has been accepted by the City, the other improvement secur sty described in this agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Map Act and any applicable City Ordinance. 17. That the Developer shall take out and maintain, during the term of this agreement, such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public liability and property damage insurance shall also directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued hereunder shall so state. The amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: A. Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily injury or death lia- bility limits of not less than 5300,000 for each person and 51,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $100,000 for each accident or occurrence with an aggregate limit of $200,000 for claims which may arise from the operations of the Developer in the performance of the work herein provided. B. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the per- formance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits of not less than $200,000 for each person and 5300,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $50,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggreaate of not less than $1009000 which may arise from the operations of the Developer or his Contractor in performing the work Provided for herein. 18. That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance. Each such certificate shall bear am endorsement precluding the cancellations, or reduction in coverage of any policy evidences by such certificate, before the ex Pirati on of thirty (30) days after the City shall have received notifica- tion by registered mail from the insurance carrier, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TRACT N0. 11420 PAGE 4 As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with same, the Subdivider has submitted the below described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND Description: Principal Amount: Surety: $70,000 -00 Attorney -in -Fact: Address: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT BOND Description: Principal Amount: Surety; $75,000.00 Attorney -in -Fact: Address: CASH DEPOSIT MONUME47ING BOND Amount stipulated by tract engineer or surveyor: Amount as shown on Construction and Bond Estimate: Mount deposited per Cash Receipt No. Date MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND To be posted prior to acceptance of the tract by the City. Principal Amount: IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executrd and acknowledged with 411 fo rmalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures. Oate 6- If-9, by '/ Ccy,,.wC �.Ssi , Subdivider Subdivider CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA a municipal corporation by__ , Mayor Attest: City C er City attorney ` CONS-1—IC—It": ADD'.1-:1) ES ?::L1TE E:XR0A(D:'I ST JF.MIT 'c F.R St:: N'LE (All -h u, "tn vp ec c ac's C—P, DATE: 6/8/81 rM11I1 ::0. t'im AeFer °nee Tract 11428 C'[y 1"'. -e ::o C MPCCEO BY B.K. at.,ce- cenc aea�st cs. CO %STRCCTION' COST ESTIMATE ITEM nl'.1Y*t :Y MIT %'N1- C0 ST R will:: L" E" ", e Aonm ach 'P., vr. S.F. .. c',," lutt:- 1 083 S. F. 3.40 Imne;ezd Enhnnkxenc :.1. Prong cM1t lTn +f A:M1aradn S.F. d. r. Lr +ar U00 TO11 .1. 1', 19'10 to IfnO en nel 1,140 i0A 1110 t. 900 c 10:; nn Tne Pa`[h l.. C.rR ren cM1V ti. ?, Ali: lct F c f..J. G: `lade F.\. A. 1 I v COYSTRVCTION COST _64,365.70 c,o;MNI.FNf\' COSTS 5,634.30 TOTAL CONSTRIICTfn% COSTS 70,000.00 FAIM rl. PRRFORMAIC.E EO%n 1100 ":) 70,000.00 AID 'ATFRt V. WT.) 0M 35,000.00 EFC.INFERINI'. t14PGCT10`i FEE 2,085.48 (rEF. S0Hti1:'I I:) MO.%NFNTATII ^I MD" WASt0 --- BOND 110272f premium: STm" FAITHFUL PEPrO R+LICCF. DO:;D h'NE RE 15, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucar.�onga, State of California, and Data Design Laboratories (hereinafter designated as "pa rc.pal "1 have entered into en acreerent wberebv principal agrees to install and complete cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated June 11 19 8.1 , and identified as .s hereby re -_:red to and made a part hereof; and, 1•:n -E_ds, said principal is reGUired under the terms of said aarecrcnt to '.urnish a bond for the faithful perfomance of said agreement. 50,:, TFC3iFOi , we the principal and Developers Insurance Couoan , as 5U re ty, are held and firrly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "city "), in the renal an. of Sevent _Thousand and no/100 ---- '--- - - - - -- OrIlars It jo.ouo.cD - -.om -y 02 tho united States, r the payment of which sum well and trul, to be rade, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, exec•a tars and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The c ition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide b and well and truly keep and verforr, t covenants, condi- tiecs and provisions in the said agreeme teand any alteration thereof -ads as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the Wanner therein Spec- ified, and in all respects according to their true intent and rearing, and shall indemni.y and sn•!!e harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as the Yein stipulated, then this obligation shall beco-.o null and void; otherwise, it shall be and regain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expense$ and fees, including reasonable at- torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be.. taxed as costs and included in any judg,.ent rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex- tension of tire, alteration or addition to the terns of the acreenena or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spec - ificaticra accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its ob]inations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such chance, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. I:: WITNESS WFI- RLOF', this instInce.rt has been duly executed 1_r ^`e r^incipa] arc surely above named, on _June 11 -- Data Design Laboratories Principal D Topers Insurance m. an Surety, be t .. ttorney --Fact be BOND $102725 Premium: $TORT 'D (Intl.) I IBOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and Data Design Laboratories (hg rei oaf ter designated as principal "1 have entered into an acreement whereby principal agrees to install and Complete cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated J..-e 19 81 , and identified as pro - jeer Tract N.. Ts hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and, WP.EREAS, baser the terms of said agreement, principal is re- quired before entering upon the performaoc :: of the work, to file a rood and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cuca- monga to secure the claims to which reEerenca is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3002) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material - men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid acreem^_nt and referred to in the aforesaid Cede of Civil Procedure in the sum of Thirty =five Thousand and no /100 Dollars 1 1, for materials Tuxrn sued or labor t ere.. any kind, or or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon. this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at- torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as cost; and to be included in the judoment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing With Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex- tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement. or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this band, and it does here- by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or ad- dition. Ill WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on June 11 19_91 Data Oes72n Tabora tori¢s Principal to ens tnsurance-C �pa,� Surety obey uip, ttorney -I act ORDINANCE NO. 148 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.10 TO TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICI- PAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A MOBILE HOME PARR RENT 1EDIATION PROCESS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 8.10 to read as follows: "Chapter 8.10 "MOBILE HOME PARR RENT MEDIATION "Sections: "8.10.010 "8.10.020 "8.10.030 "B. 10.040 "8.10.050 "8.10.060 "8.10.070 "8.10.080 "8.10.090 "8.10.100 "8.10.110 "8.10.120 Intent and purpose. Right to petition. Contents of petition. Filing and fees. Preliminary processing. Meet - and - confer session. Appeal. Conduct and mediation. Finality of decision. Judicial relief. Remedies for failure to attend meet -and- confer session. Rescheduling and continuances. "8.10.010 Intent and purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish a mandatory meet- and - confer process between tenants and owners of mobile home parks with respect to certain proposed rent increases. "8.10.020 Right to petition. Within thirty (30) days after an owner of a mobile home park has given notice to the tenants thereof of a proposed rent increase which exceeds the consumer price index as outlined in Section 8.10.050, the tenants may petition the City to call a mandatory meet -and- confer session between the mobile home park owner and a committee of the tenants for the purpose of discussing the proposed rent increase and the reasons therefor. Or, finance No. 148 Page 2 "8 10.030 Contents of petition. Any petition filed pursuant to this chapter shall contain all of the following information: "A. The name and address of the mobile home park. "B. The name and address of the owner(s) of the mobile home park. "C. The number of spaces in the mobile home park. "D. The number of spaces which were vacant on the date the notice of rent increase was given. "E. A statement of the existing rent schedule and the proposed rent schedule. "F. A statement of the rent schedule in effect as of twelve (12) months prior to the date on which the proposed rent increase would be effective. "G. A brief statement of the reasons why petitioners believe the proposed rent increase is not justified and a request for a meet - and - confer session with the mobile home park owner. "H. The signatures of and identification of the mobile home space occupied by each tenant signing the same. "I. The names of a tenants' committee of not more than five (5) persons, designating one (1) person as chairperson. 118.10.040 Filing and fees. "A. Any petition filed pursuant to this chapter shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. "B, No petition tendered for filing pursuant to this chapter shall be filed unless the filing fee therefor, in an amount established by resolution of the City Council, is first paid. "8.10.050 Preliminary processing. Within seventy -two (72) hours after receiving a petition filed pursuant to this chapter, the City Clerk will review the same to determine whether a meet- and - confer session shall be required. A meet - and- confer session shall be required only :if: "A. The petition contains the signatures of tenants representing more than fifty percent (50 %) of the occupied mobile home spaces in the mobile home park. No. 148 Page 1 "B. The petition contains all of the information required by Section 8.10.040 hereof; and, "C. The proposed rent increase computes to be greater than one hundred percent (100%) of the percentage by which the Los Angeles -Long Beach - Anaheim Area Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, as recorded by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, has increased in the twelve (12) months immediately preceding the effective date of the proposed rent increase. "If the City Clerk determines that a petition complies with the requirements of this section, the City Clerk shall select a date, time and place for a meet - and - confer session between the tenants' committee and the mobile home park owner. Whenever possible, the date selected shall be at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of the proposed rent increase. The City Clerk shall, by certified mail, give notice of the meeting to the chairperson of the tenants' committee and the mobile home park owner. .TtwC#;Sc -- cla[k.sha ,1„ ^'en mail a of rhP,�o,PCition. sx� - "8.10.060 Meet - and - confer session. At the mandatory meet -and- confer session, the tenants' committee and the mobile home park owner, or a duly authorized representative, shall meet for the purpose of exchanging information, opinions and proposals with respect to the proposed rent increase. The mobile home park owner shall be prepared to give an explanation of the necessity for a rent increase in excess of the Consumer Price Index percentage described in Section 8.10.050C and the mobile home park owner shall also be prepared to inform the tenants as to the nature of any substantial improvements proposed for the mobile home park during the next year.' The parties shall endeavor to reach agreement on matters within the scope of discussion. "8.10.070 Appeal. If agreement on the amount of the proposed rent increase cannot be reached between the tenants' committee and the mobile home park owner, either party may appeal to the West End Mediation Board, located in Ontario, California, for further mediation and conciliation. Notice of such appeal must be filed with the City Clerk not more than five (5) days after termination of the mandatory meet -and- confer session. A notice of appeal will not be received for filing unless it is accompanied by payment of the fee estab- lished by resolution of the City Council, which said fee shall be in an amount appropriate to compensate the West End Mediation Board for the mediation services to be rendered, ,lac t r No. 198 Page 4 "8.10.080 Conduct and Mediation. Mediation by the West End Mediation Board shall be conducted in accordance with standards of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. The West End Mediation Board shall prepare a summary of facts concerning the proposed rent increase in the event the mobile home park owner and the tenants' committee cannot reach mutual agreement upon a proposed rent increase. Such summary of facts presented by the West End Mediation Board shall be advisory. "8.10.090 Finality of Decision. The summary of facts concerning the proposed rent increase prepared by the West End Mediation Board shall be the final administrative action upon any petition filed pursuant to this chapter with no provisions for further appeal. Such findings and recommendations shall be public records and may be certified by the secretary of the West End Mediation Board, if any, or by the City Clerk. 118.10.100 Judicial Relief. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to preclude any mobile home park tenant or mobile home park owner from seeking and obtaining any appropriate judicial relief. 4.10.110 Remedies for failure to attend meet- and - confer sessions. "A. If the tenants' committee fails to attend a scheduled meet- and - confer session or a scheduled mediation session before the West End Mediation Board, the City Clerk shall order the petition dismissed and no further proceedings shall be had thereon. "B. If the mobile home park owner, or an authorized representative, fails to attend a scheduled meet -and- confer session or a scheduled mediation session before the West End Mediation Board, then the proposed rent increase shall not become effective until such time as the mobile home park owner, or an authorized representative, has in fact attended a rescheduled meet - and - confer session or a rescheduled mediation session before the West End Mediation Board, as the case may be. "8.10.120 ReschedulinK and continuances. "A. Rescheduling of meet - and - confer sessions shall be done by the City Clerk. Rescheduling of mediation sessions before the West End Mediation Board shall be done by the secretary of the West End Mediation Board. Any such rescheduled session shall be held within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date originally set therefor. Ordinance No. 148 Page 5 "B. A meet- and - confer session may be continued by written stipulation of the tenants' committee and the mobile home park owner or his or her authorized representative and such stipulation shall be filed with the City Clerk. A hearing on any appeal to the West End Mediation Board may be continued in accordance with the rules established by the West End Mediation Board. ". SECTION 2: TERMINATION: Unless extended by action of the City Council, this Ordinance shall terminate and have no force and effect three years after adoption. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk We, the undersigned, wish to voice our opyosition to the proposed zone change from A -1 (Single family residential) to R- 2 -P.11. ('4ultipl)g Family Residential - Planed Development) of 4.55 acres of land on the tiiest side of Turner Avenue beuveen Church and Baseline Road - -APM 208- 061 -03. In addition to the lowered property values, we are concerned with the already over - crowded school situation which would be further burdened by a multiple family residential unit and the potential for increased crime that accompanies the trah0ent personalities that usually inhabit apartment dwellings, With the high cost of housino, the proposal is unfair to the nresent home owner, who bou it into this area bec.ausc• of the zoninn io existence and rannut afford to move etset; her,- at the present time. SIGNATURE PR1ilT ADDRE�,, 7. GM a ... - 7st d ... .y� 9. -t�,,' ^�S`h._7?.Ot�,� ..7�.YU 'U`R,1N✓� -�'T� __ 2M1� 1 3 . 14 G�,C UU �•ti. _7i��7 , . _�.,tt,' -ass 1 5. ,7635 . -- �" • 6:11 l ;i • U 7sxlti �- rs.nSpitii�.Acif.:� �x..cX � ._ 9.n /��, )oa5N.�^. Pja lac .ems. 20.I�CX TELEPHONE 0,w_2Y2 72239 987-1 8q 3 99 831p y�Y9:�e3� 939 Xo�._ 9S�ji soh "y 1 Ut1ti4 �'1 8 hc�a� �WCWO - !CCyy BaLO ST - T /-(-,5 .1 =' 3 Q S / , 4--- tz sw �)9 3c 3s �v0Sgu3-A -% �n - toOgB� vR- &2S L ; 7 --5 -qo � y ✓� a$o3 c 7610 Woey Inc CwChr aw?fp i' Cc- c�vUnj� l%�..- %,rte. 7> �l l�!�j✓�[O�ti� latr9x- r�r�49�o Ve, the undersigned, psi sh to voica our opposition to the fropused zone change from A -1 (Single family residential) to R -2 -P.' 1. (Multiple Family Residential- Planed Oevel opment) of 4.55 acres of land on the west side of Turner Avenue between Church and baseline Road --APN 208- 061 -(Il- In addition to the I- owered pro,�erty values, we are concerned Kith the already over- crnwded schoo, situation which mould be further hardened by a multiple family residential unit and the uotpntial for increased crime that acconp)dn i0S tbo frantiirot personoilt re% that usudIIy inhabit: apartment drelIinns. With the high cost of housing, toe proposai is unfair to *he oresent honi owners who bought into this area because of Lite zonino in existence and cannot ,7fferd to move elsewhere at the present time. SIGNATURE PRR1T ADDRESS TELEPHONE 2. M. %5?s` ;2 nnor,4 AYe ...Coc?m" 987E1_1� -- 7 ? 9�7� 57 3 s_ P. 1.5-5 S ��_zi/./ 4l!- 9zue-"� 4. Q_� i,_?d /r!Yi��..L1it�r�tvllc/R_ I'fD'LL( 5. � _ _ � , Yr 7. e0k, _Z 9.�G4./i ,�(� ((�� //�� 10. 1_ "It7�.X(l<L1k)UOV 7,6(T %�'�- 73� 12. ref C_ ts�l:v��.. -�LtL 7y8� y.��n�Nll lluc �iu<r�n�Nclt %3'Y-�.� ' 7eRa Q�cas`,s.cvsa QS�-aEU$ l��rQtiJ�J�/( ccc(��/�('��, /J,n� /.c /%��J�y� - U�.f7a �tf°9/�7[�N��//�1��l ✓�'. �,u //c//�j�., ld /l,�j ._ I'le, the undersi(Ine, Zone (a and thea erst 'Rod rdentryal- Planed our reird,rntia 1)r� to 0 the pr opctied 9 land on .Road - -q Pq 20R- side of Turner De vel opor e.nt R-2 -p 061 -07. Avenue between ) ur h an arr een Church and p� of In addition to the lower ed of I' me the already over - crowded Pro oerty v burdened ty a r,ultirl school aIues, We ar for i,c .rime tha family r•eS i den t is lr ynith you Id nbe concerned further wi t reared r. tha' usually inha bi f, agar t'nconi p a n ies .� and Irote her the the ntial With the hi eat dwellings.` transient personalities h une o at cost housi Prorrct weer; v; no n ino, the �.i ;tence anr, ca nnot this al is unf afford area he.cause air to the or to nrave elsewhere at the e5ent zoning in SIG,VA T ";S the Pre;ont time. 1 11 PR hVT ADDRESS 2. tti ` r)S..._Tet}r to C IEI EPHONE 3$�eAklUgl Cu_Cgnq'4. 4r�3 9 B? 4 � / 031 3 ✓dCb�lGZ L. —s p a rrL_l�O Laoa..e - CHt,LI'z 12..`z ;x;ai( h) _._.g11 cl6A.�1 ?� N 1 g 2o.q ,} `` %1777 �t.( Gc/ c Ccc2 l7 987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM June 17, 1981 T0: City Manager and Members of the City Council FROM: Assistant City Manager e SUBJECT: West End Mediation Board and Fee Resolution For Mobile Home Park Rent Mediation Ordinance 148 If Council elects to adopt for first reading Ordinance 148 which provides for a Mobile Home Park Rent Mediation Process, it will be necessary for staff to prepare an appropriate fee resolution and agreement with the West End Mediation Board. As the Ordinance now stands, a petition of appeal to the West End Mediation Board requirs the payment of a fee to defray the costs of the Medi- ation Board. Attached is an example of a recent agreement betweent the City of Chino and the West End Mediation Board. Although our agreement would vary slightly because Rancho Cucamonga did not create a formal mediation board, the process of handling rent mediation disputes would be very similar. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Staff would recommend Council consideration and adoption of first reading for Ordinance 148 implementing a Mobile Home Park Rent Mediation process. 2. Direct staff to prepare an appropriate agreement with the West End Media- tion board outlining the procedures in the Ordinance and relationship with .the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Direct staff to prepare an appropriate Fee Resolution as mentioned in Ordinance 148. Staff could be directed to work directly with the Mobile Home Committee of Councilmen Mikels and Bridge. Appeal Fees could be divided equally between owners and tenants or as directed by the Council Committee. JR /vz Attachment California - - -- 1]:.20 CENTF4L A \'E N'JE/ P O 00% G6l/ CHINO CgLIFOPNIA 91710 April 22, 19BI Shirley Huston, Chairman Board of Directors West End Mediation Board 271 South Lemon Ontario CA 91761 LETTER OF AGREEMENT `' I' l Office of the CITY MANAGER roc ,..n..��. APrA COO& 17141 627.777 This letter will serve as an agreement between the City of Chino and the West End Mediation Board. The City of Chino has estab- lished a Aobilehome Park Pent Mediation Board whose purpose is to mediate disputes between owners and tenants concerning rent increases in mobilehome parks within the City of Chino. The West End Mediation Board is a private, nonprofit organization serving the West End cities including the City of Chino. The primary goal of the West End Mediation Board is to help citizens resolve their disputes themselves. The City of Chino agrees to: 1. Pay to the West End Mediation Board the sum of $225 for each mediation conducted at the request of the City. Each mediation nay require one or more sessions. The West End Mediation Board agress to: 1. Provide training to the Chino Mobilehome Park Rent Mediation Board members. 2. Designate one or more members of the West End Mediation Board to coordinate, supervise, and participate as necessary in all pro - ceed:nys of the Chino Mobilehome Park Rent Mediation Board upon request of the City of Chino. 3. Assure that mediation is conducted in accordance with standards o`. the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service as well as applicable ordinances of the City of Chino. 4. Provide for the rendering to the City of written minutes con - cerning activities, actions, results of hearings, and all other matters pertinent to the Chino Mobilehome Park Rent Mediation Ordinances. west End Mediation Board April 22, 1961 Letter of Agreement Page 2 5. Provide for a summary of the facts concerning a rent increase in the event that owners and tenants cannot mutually agree upon an equitable rent. Such summary shall include any views or opinions that the Chino Mobilehome Park Rent Mediation Board may have concerning the proposed increase. However, an opinion of whether the proposed rent increase appears justified and equitable will not be required from the West End Mediation Board. 6. Conduct mediation sessions within the Chino City limits at a location designated by the City of Chino. This agreement will be effective until cancelled upon written notice by one of the parties. for CITY OF CHINO for west End Mediation Board Dated: Dated ORDINANCE NO. 148 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.10 TO TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICI- PAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A MOBILE HOME PARK RENT MEDIATION PROCESS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 8.10 to read as follows: "Chapter 8.10 "MOBILE HOME PARK RENT MEDIATION "Sections: "8.10.010 Intent and purpose. "8.10.020 Right to petition. "8.1U.030 Contents of petition. "8.10.040 Filing and fees. "8.10.050 Preliminary processing. "8.10.060 Meet - and - confer session. "8.10.070 Appeal. "8.10.080 Conduct and mediation. "8.10.090 Finality of decision. "8.10.100 Judicial relief. "8.10,110 Remedies for failure to confer session. attend meet -and- "8.10.120 Rescheduling and continuances. "8.10.010 Intent and purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish a mandatory meet - and - confer process between tenants and owners of mobile home parks with respect to certain proposed rent increases. "8.10.020 Right to petition. Within thirty (30) days after an owner of a mobile home park has given notice to the tenants thereof of a proposed rent increase which exceeds the consumer price index as outlined in Section 8.10.050, the tenants may petition the City to call a mandatory meet -and- confer session between the mobile home park owner and a committee of the tenants for the purpose of discussing the proposed rent increase and the reasons therefor. Ordinance No. 148 Page 2 "8.10.030 Contents of petition. Any petition filed pursuant to this chapter shall contain all of the following information: "A. The name and address of the mobile home park. "B. The name and address of the owner(s) of the mobile home park. "C. The number of spaces in the mobile home park. "D. The number of spaces which were vacant on the date the notice of rent increase was given. "E. A statement of the existing rent schedule and the proposed rent schedule. "F. A statement of the rent schedule in effect as of twelve (12) months prior to the date on which the proposed rent increase would be effective. "G. A brief statement of the reasons why petitioners believe the proposed rent increase is not justified and a request for a meet - and - confer session with the mobile home park owner. "B. The signatures of and identification of the mobile home space occupied by each tenant signing the same. "I. The names of a tenants' committee of not more than five (5) persons, designating one (1) person as chairperson. "8.10.040 Filing and fees. "A. Any petition filed pursuant to this chapter shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. "B. No petition tendered for filing pursuant to this chapter shall be filed unless the filing fee therefor, in an amount established by resolution of the City Council, is first paid. "8.10.050 Preliminary processing. Within seventy -two (72) hours after receiving a petition filed pursuant to this chapter, the City Clerk will review the same to determine whether a meet- and - confer session shall be required. A meet - and- confer session shall be required only if: "A. The petition contains the signatures of tenants representing more than fifty percent (50X) of the occupied mobile home spaces in the mobile home park. Ordinance No. 148 Page 3 "B. The petition contains all of the information required by Section 8.10.040 hereof; and, "C. The proposed rent increase computes to be greater than one hundred percent (100 %.) of the percentage by which the Los Angeles -Long Beach - Anaheim Area Consumer Price index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, as recorded by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, has increased in the twelve (12) months immediately preceding the effective dare of the proposed rent increase. "If the City Clerk determines that a petition complies with the requirements of this section, the City Clerk shall select a date, time and place for a meet- and - confer session between the tenants' committee and the mobile home park owner. Whenever possible, the date selected shall be at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of the proposed rent increase. The City Clerk shall, by certified mail, give notice of the meeting to the chairperson of the tenants' committee and the mobile home park owner. The City Clerk shall also mail a copy of the petition to the mobile home park owner. "8.10.060 Meet - and - confer session. At the mandatory meet - and - confer session, the tenants' committee and the mobile home park owner, or a duly authorized representative, shall meet for the purpose of exchanging information, opinions and proposals with respect to the proposed rent increase. The mobile home park owner shall be prepared to give an explanation of the necessity for a rent increase in excess of the Consumer Price Index percentage described in Section 8.I0.050C and the mobile home park owner shall also be prepared to inform the tenants as to the nature of any substantial improvements proposed for the mobile home park during the next year. The parties shall endeavor to reach agreement on matters within the scope of discussion. "8.10.070 Appeal. If agreement an the amount of the proposed rent increase cannot be reached between the tenants' committee and the mobile home park owner, either party may appeal to the West End Mediation Board, located in Ontario, California, for further mediation and conciliation. Notice of such appeal must be filed with the City Clerk not more than five (5) days after termination of the mandatory meet -and- confer session. A notice of appeal will not be received for filing unless it is accompanied by payment of the fee estab- lished by resolution of the City Council, which said fee shall be in an amount appropriate to compensate the West End Mediation Board for the mediation services to be rendered. Ordinance No. 148 Page 4 "8.10.080 Conduct and Mediation. Mediation by the West End Mediation Board shall be conducted in accordance with standards of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. The West End Mediation Board shall prepare a summary of facts concerning the proposed rent increase in the event the mobile home park owner and the tenants' committee cannot reach mutual agreement upon a proposed rent increase. Such sum nary of facts presented by the West End Mediation Board shall be advisory. "8.10.090 Finality of Decision. The summary of facts concerning the proposed rent increase prepared by the West End Mediation Board shall be the final administrative action upon any petition filed pursuant to this chapter with no provisions for further appeal. Such findings and recommendations shall be public records and may be certified by the secretary of the West End Mediation Board, if any, or by the City Clerk. "8.10.100 Judicial Relief. Nothing in this chapter shall he deemed to preclude any mobile home park tenant or mobile home park owner from seeking and obtaining any appropriate judicial relief. "8.10.110 Remedies for failure to attend meet- and - confer sessions. "A. If the tenants' committee fails to attend a scheduled meet - and - confer session or a scheduled mediation session before the West End Mediation Board, the City Clerk shall order the petition dismissed and no further proceedings shall be had thereon. "B. If the mobile home park owner, or an authorized representative, fails to attend a scheduled meet- and - confer session or a scheduled mediation session before the West End Mediation Board, then the proposed rent increase shall not become effective until such time as the mobile home park owner, or an authorized representative, has in fact attended a rescheduled meet- and - confer session or a rescheduled mediation session before the West End Mediation Board, as the case may be. "8.10.120 Rescheduling and continuances, "A. Rescheduling of meet- and - confer sessions shall be done by the City Clerk. Rescheduling of mediation sessions before the West End Mediation Board shall be done by the secretary of the West End Mediation Board. Any such rescheduled session shall be held within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date originally set therefor. Ordinance No. 148 Page 5 "B. A meet- and - confer session may be continued by written stipulation of the tenants' committee and the mobile home park owner or his or her authorized representative and such stipulation shall be filed with the City Clerk. A hearing on any appeal to the West End Mediation Board may be continued in accordance with the rules established by the West End Mediation Board. ". SECTION 2: TERMINATION: Unless extended by action of the City Council, this Ordinance shall terminate and have no force and effect three years after adoption. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least • once in The Datly Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk ,21 ff e 2-