Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/11/20 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f3EGULAit MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. November 20, 1991 Civic Center Countil Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91930 ~~• City Cormcibnembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alezander, Councilmember Charles J. Buquet, Cauncllmem6er Diane Williams, Councllmember Pamela J. Wright, Couneilmember •• Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989.1851 City Council Agenda November 20, 1991 1 All trees auDeittad for the City Comcil Agenda suet Da is writing. The deadline for auMittivg theca trees is 5:00 p.e. an the Wednesday prior to the egtivg. The city Clerk's Oftice receives all sucD iteNe. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll call: Buquet _, Alexander _, StOUt _, Will tame _, and Wright B. ANNOVNC6MSMT8/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of Pzoclamat ion declaring the week of November 24 - 30, 1991 ae Aancho Cucanwnga Family Week. S. CONMVNICATIONB PROM THE PUBLIC This is the tiu and pLCe for the general public to addrew the Citp Couvcil. Stab law pro`.ihits the Citp CAUVeil froe addrosiag any taus not previously included ov the Agevd•. The C1tp Council up receive batiaoay and tet the attar for e subsequent weting. Coeaents an to De 1Lited tv five einutas per individual. D. CONSRrT CALENDAR The folloeing Conant Calendar itua •re expected to be routine evd nos-controversial. Theq will be acted upon 6p the Council et one rise without discussion. Aap tree Yp De revved by • CvuvciLaeber or aeeDer of the sudlence for discussion. 1. Approval of Warr ante, Register Noe. 10/30/91 and 1 11/6/90; and Payroll ending 10/26/91 for the total amount of $985,525.19. 2. Approval [o receive and file current Investment Schedule 10 as of Oc[ober 31, 1991. 3. Approval of 8ummaty Vacnt ion of excess Right-vf-Hay of jq Etiwanda Avenue, located north of Whittram Avenue. n PA E ~•'^[ ~~~~.f ~~~ } W ;')y" City Council Agentla ~ -'J(/~ November 2p, 1991 2 1S RESOLUTION NO. 91-336 A RESOLUTION O£ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, SVHMARILY OADERINO THE VACATION OP A PORTION OF ETIWANDA AVENVE, LOCATED NORTH OF WHITTAAH AVENUB 4. Approval to execute an agreement for the Installation of IB Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way at the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue between Homestead Sav inga and the CSty of Rancho Cucamonga, RESOLUTION NO. 91-337 I9 A RESOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF STREET SMYAOVEMENTE ANO DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY PROM HOMESTEAD SAVINGS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME 5. Approval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract 2~ and Lien Agreement from Alchard Clemente for an eddit ion to a single family residence, located on the east aide of Buena Vista, north of Camino Sur. RESOLUTION NO. 91-338 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COllNCIL OF THfi CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RICHARD CLEMENTS ANO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME 6. Approval to execute a Renewal Agreement for the Z3 Landscape and irrigation Contract (CO 90-143) EoY Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts 1 and 5 to Landscape West of Anaheim, California, for the amount of 5181,452.00, [o be funded Dy Landscape Haintenance Assessment Oietricte 1 and 5, Account Numbers 40-4130- 6028 and 44-4130-6028, respectively. PA E 5f i~~~ City council Agenda November 20, 1991 3 7. Approval to execute a Aenewal Agreement for the Z¢ Landscape and Irrigation Contract (CO 90-146) for Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts 2 and 4 to Landscape west Of Anaheim, California, Eor the amount of $685,900.00, to be funded by Landscape Maintenance Assessment Oiet[icts 2 and 4, Account Numbers 41-4130- fi028 and 43-4330-6028, respectively. 8. Approval to execute a Aenewal Agreement for the 25 Landscape and Irrigation Contract (CO 90-145) for General Fund and Landscape Maintenance Aeeeeamant D iat iicte 3A and 3B to Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises of Irwindale, California, for the amount of $258,970.00, to be funded by the General Fund and Landscape Maintenance Assessment Oiet ricks 3A and 36, Account Numbs re 01-6647-6026, 42-4130-6028 and 46-4130- 6028, respectively, 9. ApprOVal to execute a Renewal Agreement for the 26 Landscape and Irrigation Contract (CO 90-075) fo[ Landscape Nalntenance Aeeeeamant Dletrici 6 to Landscape We at of Anaheim, California, for the amount of $161,000.00, to be funded by Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 6, Account Number 45-4130-6028. 30. Approval to execute a Renewal Agreement Eor the 2] Landscape and Irrigation contract (CO 89-136) for the Haven Median Islands and San Bernardino County Flood control Waehende to Haripoea Mort lcultural Enterprises of Irwindale, California, for the amount of $206,960.00, Co be funded by General Fund, County Flood Control, Landscape MdinLenance Aeeeeamant Districts 1, 2, and 4, Account Numbers 01-4647-6028, OB-4647-6028, 40-6130- 6028, 41-4130-6028, and 43-4130-6028, respectively. 11. Approval of Nap, axscution of Improvement Agreement, 2g Improvement Securit lee, Agzeemeni of Postponement of Recordation of Covenant e, Conditions and Aeetrictione and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance Di et rict No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance Oletz ict Noe. 1 antl 4 for Tract Map 13351, located on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vlate Parkway, submitted by Lewis Development Company. PA ~~~ City Council Agenda November 20, 1991 4 RESOLUTION NO. 91-339 3~ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SMPROVE MENT AGREBMENT, IMPAOVEHHNT SECURITIES AND FINAL MAP OP TRACT NO. 13351 REEOLUTION NO. 91-340 3j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AGRBEMENT WITH L&WIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OP APPROVAL OP COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NO. 13351 RESOLUTION NO. 91-341 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CSTY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THB ANNE%ATION OP CERTAIN TERA ITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO3. 1 ANO 4 FOA TRACT NO. 13351 12. Approval of Hap, execution of Improvement Agreement, 35 Improvement Security, Agreement £or Postponement of Recordation of Covenant e, Condit lone and Reet riCtione,a nd Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Dietr ict No. 4 end Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and 4 for Tract No. 13717, locatsd on the southeast corner of Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue, submitted by Lewis development Company. RESOLVTION NO. 91-342 3) A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 13717, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECVRITY v~ e 'rj j~~ City council Agenda November 20, 1991 S RESOLUTION NO. 91-343 3$ A RHEOLUT ION OF THfi CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH LEW15 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR POSTPONHMENT OP APPROVAL OP COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NO. 13717 RESOLUTION NO. 91-344 39 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CAL IFOANIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OP CHRTA IN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 3 AND 4 POR TRACT NO. 13737 13. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, 4Q Improvement Security antl ordering the annezat ion to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance Dletrtct Noe, 1 and 2 for Tract 14192-1, located south of 19th street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues, submitted by Hiz Development Corporation. RESOLUTION N0. 91-345 Q~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TAIICT MAP NUMBER 1419$-I, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECVAITY RESOLUTION NO. 91-34fi Q$ A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOA TRACT NO. 14192-1 14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 51 Tract 12659-1 Loceted on the eouthweet corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th street submitted by Etiwanda Estates. PAGE City Council Agenda November 20, 1991 6 RESOLUTION NO. 91-347 53 A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANU IMPROVEMENT SBCUR ITY FOR TRACT 12659-1 15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Exiene ion for 54 Parcel Map 13341 located on the aoutheaet corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 91-346 56 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPAOV ING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVHMHNT 6HCURI TY POR PARCEL MAP 11341 16. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 5] Parcel Map 11940 located on tho southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Elm Avenue, submitted by Sahama Development. RESOLUTION NO. 91-349 59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11940 17. Approval to release sonde for Parcel Map 11030 - 6~ Foothill Medians. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $105,749.00 Labor and Materials Bond 5 52,679.00 18. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 61 10349 Located on the we et Bide of Sapphire Street at Thoroughbred Street. Release: Main<enance Guarantee Band (Street) $ 32,600.00 19. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond fo[ Tract 62 13715 located at the northeast corner of Jennet Street and Exeter Court. PA E Y ~z City Council Agenda ^Y November 20r 1991 (VL 7 Aeleaae: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 4x400.00 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 5 1x900.00 E. CONSmFf ORDINANCES TDe following Ordinenca• have Ded public hearings at the time of Eirat reeding. Second rudinge ere expected to be routine and nov-controosre tel. TDep will Da acted upoq Dy tDr CAVncil at one time without diecuseivq. TDe Citp Clerk will read the title. Avp tree eau De ra~oved for diecuulon. 1. S N F AOPDSFD ADOPTION BY REPEAENCE OF SAN BERNARD IMO COUNTY ORDINANCE NO 3349 AS ADOPTED BY THE ORS OF TNS COUNTY OP EAN BERNARDINO AOA.D OF SVPERVIS _ PERTAINING TO THE VEHICLE ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL PROGRAM OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BBRNARD IMO ORDINANCE NO. 460 (second reading) 63 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CZTY OP RANCHO CVCAMONCAr CALIFORNIAx ADOPTING, RY REPERENCfir ORDINANCE NO. 3349 OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BEANARDINO PERTAINING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RULES, RECULATIONSr AND PROCEDUAfiS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE VEHICLE ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL PAOGPAM OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD INOx INCLUDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN FEES AND PENALTIES 2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES SNENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to atld Section 17.00.040P and Section 17.08.070E to the Development Code eetabliehin9 property maintenance atenddrde and ongoing maintenance requirements foc Multiple-Family Dwell Inge. ORDINANCE NO. 464 (second reeding) 6$ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGAr CALIFORNIAx APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-03, ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 17.08.040-P AND A NEW SUBSECTION 77.08.070-E TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS AND ONGOING MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIPLE- FAMILY DWELLINGSr AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF PA E ~~~[ Ctty Council Agenda ^ 1C,~~/^ November 20, 1991 E 3. CONSI ON OF I ON NT LO 9 - C CUCAHONGA - A tequeet to amend various development etandarde and design guidelines for molt L-family residential district e. Staff recommends ieeuance of a Negative Declaration. ORDINANCE NO. 465 (eecond reading) 68 AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF AANCMO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING TITLE 17 OP THE AANCMO CUCAHONGA MVNICIPAL CODS, REGARDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GV IDELINES FOR MULTI-PAHILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. AND MAAING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT THfiAEOP CON D O R N N VIST O CUCAMONGA - A tequeet to amend vAtioue development etandarde and design guidelines Eor multi-family residential districts within the Terra Viete Planned Community area. St aft recommends ieeuance of a Negative Declaration. ORDINANCE No. 466 (second reading) 86 AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WfNCHO CVCANONGAr CALI PORNIAr APPROVING TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 93-02r AMENDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THSREOP CONSID& T N OF ENVI O ASSES ME T CTO PLrANED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 9j -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend vaiioue development etandarde and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts within the Victoria Planned Community area. Staff recommends ieeuance of a Negative Declaration. PAGE '(~~` City Council Agenda U November 20, 1991 9 ORDINANCE NO. 467 (second reading) 97 AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COI4fUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THERBOP 4. CONSIDERATION O E TAB ISH P ED I T OP 40 MPN N HILLSIDE ROAD F C I AVENUE TO N A NV 40 MPH ON OUNTAIN V N RIVE O SPAUC A NV TO HILL AVENVE 35 M O AEDER ICESHURG AND CANIS AVENUES PROH H ST ET TO WI SON AVE E ORDINANCE NO. 46B (second reading) lpg AN OADINANCS OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI PORNIA/ AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS P. ADVHRTISBD PVBLIC HEARINGS Tae following iteu bare hero advs rtLed avtl/or pvatad •• pub lie heariaga a required hp law. Tae Chair will open the aeetivg to receive paalic tsatiaoap. 1. CONSID T ON OP CO O OR CO V S RVIC S PROGRAMS 111 RESOLUTION NO. 91-194-A 111Y A RESOLUTION OF THE CZTY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91-194, TO INCLUDE USER FEES FOA RECREATION ACTIVITIES AND RENTALS 2. APP A 0 CON ITIONAL US E IT 78-03 REVOC ON S1Z SAM'S PLACE - cone Lderet ion of an appeal of the Planning Commission's dec felon to Yevoke Contllt ion al Use Permit 7R-03 far the operation of a bar in conjunction with a ceecaurant located in the Netghbcrhood Commercial District at 6620 CarnelLan Street, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian streets - APN: 203-811-66 through 60. (Cavtiausd from October 16, 1991) PAO@ ii ~^~~~~~ CitY Council Agenda November 20, 1991 ( lVl 30 AESOLUTI ON NO. 91-350 19] A RE50LVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO REVOKE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 POR TXE OPERATION OP A EAR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT LOCATED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AT 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, NORTHWEST CORNER OP 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS AND MAKING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT ?HEREOF - APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH 60 3. APPEAL OP AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7E-03 - jjZ SAM'S PLACE -Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to tleny the raquesi to extentl the hours of operation and amend the condition of approval prohibiting live entertainment for an existing restaurant and bar located in the Neighborhood CommeYCial District at 6620 Carnelian Stce¢t, northwest Cotner OE 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 203-ell-56 through 60. (COntisaed from October 16, 1991) RESOLUTION NO. 91-351 ZQD A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY THS AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 FOR THE REQUEST TO EXTEND THE HOURS OF OPERATION AND AMEND THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL PROHIBITING LIVE ENTERTAINMENT FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AND BAR LOCATED IN THE NEICHeOFt1t00D COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AT 6630 CARNELIAN STREET, NORTHWEST CORNEA OF 19TH AND CARNBL IAN STREETS AND MAXING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201- 811-56 THROUGH 60 4. APPEAL OF DENIAL O ENT R AI N IT 91-02 SAM'S ]1Z P C - ConeideraC ion Of an appeal of tha Planning Commis¢io n's decisLon to deny the request to conduct live entertainment in conjunction with a restaurant and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 6620 carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian St rests - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (COStisued from October 16, 1991) rase Z~~~~ City Council Agenda November 20, 1991 11 REEOLUTION NO. 91-352 zQ3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 FOR THE REQUEST TO CONDUCT LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AND BAA LOCATED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD C0t4fERCIAL ^IBTRTCT AT 6620 CARNELIAN BTREET, NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN GTAEETS AND MARZNG FEND INGE IA SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 20-1811-86 5. CONSIDE TIO O GLUT O S TING TH FO IO ZO6 O HELLO RODS C AC DI 1 (COStisuW from Novsfbsr 6, 1991) (PROPONENTS REQDEBT ITEM BE CONTINUED TO THE DECEMBER 0, 1991 MEETING) 6. CO BID AA IDN OF NV RO NT SB SS AN ZO7 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-3E - DIVERSIFIED - Appeal of two (2) Condit tone of approval imposed Dy the Planning Cortmiseion regarding the undergroundin9 of utilities within the Route 30 Freeway right-of-way adjacent io a shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northeast Corner of Haven end Highland Avenues - APNS 201-271-66 and 71. AEEOLUTION N0. 91-353 2076M A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST TO DELETE TWO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-15 FOR TWO RETAIL B02L0INGS TOTALING 14,800 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE HAVEN VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AND HIGHLAND AVENUES SN THE NEIGHBORHOOD CONMEACZAL DISTRICT AND HARING FSNDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - ARM: 201- 271-65 ANO 71 7. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO GENERAL 2O£i PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Element Map from Medium Residential (8-34 dwelling unite per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-E dwelLinq unite per acre) for the following 9ubareae within the Et iwanda and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plen areas: PAOE ~~~ City Council Agenda November 20, 1991 12 3. Approximately 27.89 acres bordered on the notthweet by the Ontario (I-16) Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda Avenue and existing Low Hedium Residential designated landr and on the south by commercially deelgneted land bordering Poothill Boulevard. The City will consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unite par acre) ae an alternative designation for this entire area - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20 and 29. 5. Approximately 30.72 scree bordered on the notthweet by the Ontario (I-16) Pceewey, on the east by Eaet Avenue and existing Low Medium Ree idential designaietl land, and on the south by Miller Avenue. The City will consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative land use for this entire area - APN: 1100-031-OB, 1100-041-04 through 30, 1100-061-03, and 1100-063-02 through 04 and port Iona of 1100- 071-01 and 02. 7. Approximately 10.09 noes bordered on the north and west by existing Low Hedium Aeaident lal tleelgnated landr on the east by existing Office designated land, and on the south by Base Line Road. The Ciiy will consider Office as an alternative land use for this entire area - APN: 227-131-34 through 36, 52, and 53. e. Approximately 20.34 acres bordered on the north by the Southern Pacific Railway, on the east Dy the Ontario (I-16) Freeway, on the south by existing Office designated land, and on the west by existing Low Hedium designated land and divided in a north-south direction by Eaat Avenue. The Clty will cone ider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternnt ive land use for this entire area - APN: 227-131-06 and 227-141-14 and 66, Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. CONSIDERATION OF ENV180NMENTAL AESESSNENT AND ETI WANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Vee Map from Hedium Aeaident ial (8-14 dwell Lng unite per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-B dwelling unite pet acre) far the following eubareee within the EL lwanda Specific Plan: _ ~_ PAGE ~~_ rCC$~;; ^~ '' /~ ~~j City Council Agenda ~ {C '~ l November 20, 1991 13 1. Approximately 27.89 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-15) Preeway, on the east by Etiwanda Avenue antl existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the south by commercially des ignated land bordering Foothill Boulevard. The City will consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative land use for this entire area - APN: 227-211-02, 04, O5, 09, 10, 15, 20, and 29. 3. Approximately 30.72 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the east by Eaat Avenue and exist inq Low Medium Re6 ident lal designated land, and on the south by Mil1eY Avenue. The City Will consider LOW Residential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) ee an alternative land use for Chia entire area - APN: 1100-033 -08, 1100-041-04 through 30, 1100-051-03, and 1100-Ofi1-02 through 04 and port Lone of 1100- 071-01 and 02. 5. Approximately 10.09 acres bordered on the north antl west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land, on the east by exiettng office designated land, and on the south by Base vine Road. The City will consider Office PYOfeesional ae an alternative land use for this entire area - APN: 227-131-34 through 36, 52, and 53. 6. Approximately 20.34 scree bordered on the north by the southern Pacific Railway, on tae eaei by the Ontario (I-15) Preeway, on the south by ex Let ing Office designated land, and on the west by existing Low Medium designated land and divided in a north-south direction by Eaet Avenue. The City will COneider Low Resident eel (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative land ue! for this enure area - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-14 and 66. Staff recommends issuance of a Negat ive Declaration. RESOLUTION NO. 91-204 246 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMBNT 91-02B, SUBAREA 3, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND VSE MAP FROM MEDIUM AESIDENTIAL (e-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) TO LOW MEDIUM PA E City Council Agenda t~~~ November 20, 1991 `~ 14 RESIDENTIAL (4-S DWELLING UNITS PBR ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 27.89 ACAHS OF LAND BORDERED ON THH NORTHWEST BY TH6 ONTARIO ~I-15) FREBWAYr ON THE EAST BY BTIWANDA AVENUE AND EXISTING LOW NHD IVM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THS SOUTH BY E%ISTING COMMERCIAL DHSIGNATHD LAND BORDERING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND HARING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP - APN: 227- 211-02, 04, O5, 09, 30, 15, 20, AND 29 AfiSOLVTION NO. 91-205 250 A RESOLUTION OP TEd CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, DENYING HTIWANDA SPECIPIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 1, TO AMEND THS 6TIWAHDA SPBCIPIC PLAN LAND USH NAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) TO LOW NEDIUH RESIDENTIAL (4-B DNBLLING UNITH PHA ACRE) POR APPROXIMATELY 27.89 ACAHE OP LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THfi ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON TN6 EAST HY HTIWANDA AVHNV6 AND EXISTING LOW HEDIUM RESZDBNTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING COMNBRCIAL DHSIGNATED LAND 80ADERING FOOTHILL BOULHVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-02, 06, 05, 09, 10, 15, 10, AND 29 AE SOLUTION NO. 91-208 254 A RESOLUTION OF THfi CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALL PORNIA, DENY ING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02 H, SUBAREA 5, TO AMEND THE GENHRAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM AESIDSNTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MHDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWHLLING UNITS PER ACAS) FOR APPAOXIMATBLY 30.72 ACRES OP LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST EY THH ONTARIO (I-15) PAEEWAY, ON THE EAST BY fiAST AVENUE AND EX ISTINC LOW MEDIUM RHSIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY MILLER AVENUE, AND MAKING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08r 1100-061-06 THROUGH 10, 1100-051-03, ANO 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, AND PORTIONS OF 1100-071-01 AND 02 PA E ~F~ City Council Agenda `C ~ ~/-~_ t}•-K' November 20, 1991 15 RESOLUTION NO. 91-209 2$8 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOANIAr DENYING ETIWANOA SPECIFIC PLAN AMHNDMENT 91-03, SUEAREA 3, TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPEC ZF IC PLAN LAND VES MAP PROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEOI UM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRB) FOR APPAO%INATELY 30.72 ACRES of LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST EY THE ONTARIO (I-15) PREEWAYr ON THE EAST BY EAST AVENUE AND EXIST INC LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTM RY HILLER AVENUBr AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TNEREOP - APNf 1100-031-OB, 1100-061-04 TNROVGH 30, 1100-051-03, 1300- 061-02 THROUGH 04, AND PORTIONS OP 1100- 071-01 AND 02 RESOLUTION NO. 91-212 262 A RESOLVTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02H, SUBAREA 7, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP PROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELL INC UNITS PfiR ACAS) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNITE PER ACAS) FOA APPROXIMATELY 10.09 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH AND WEST BY HXISTING LOW MEDIVM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, ON THE EAST BY EXISTING OPFICE DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOVTH BY BASE LINE ROADr AND MA%ING FINDINGS ,IN SUPPORT TNEREOP - APN: 227-131-34 THROUGH 36, 52, ANO 53 ORDINANCE NO. 453 (firer reading) 265 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 5, TO AMEND THE HTIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIVM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-R DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPRO%IMATELY 10.09 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH AND WEST BY EX ZBTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND. ON THE EAST BY E%TSTING 7~J~'•(-7.y City Council Agenda V November 20, 1993 16 OFFICE/PROPESSIONAL OHSIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY BASE LINE ROAD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEAEOP - APN: 227- 133-34 THROUGH 36, 52, AND 53 RESOLUTION NO. 91-213 269 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FOANIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-028, WEST PORTION OF SUBAREA 8, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND VSE MAP PROH M80IOH RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PHR ACRE) TO I.OW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING ^NITS PER ACRE) POR APPRO%IMATELY 30 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST BY EAST AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH 8Y E%ISTING OFFICE DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THH WEST BY E%ISTING LOW-MEDIVM RHSIDfiNTIAL OESIGNATBD LANG - APN: 227-141-14 AND 66) AND DENYING THE EAST PORTION OP SUBAREA 8, TO AMEND THE GHNERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE 4, :ST PORTION FOR APPRO%IMATELY 10.36 ACRES OP LAND BOR-EAED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOVTHEAN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST AND SOUTN BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREHWAY, ANO ON THE WEST BY EAST AVENUE - APN: 227-133-06, AND RAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 654 (first reading) 273 AN ORDINANCE OF TNfi CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETI WANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, WEST PORTION OF SUBAREA 6, TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FRON MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPRO%IMATELY 30.00 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST BY fiAST AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH BY EXSS TING OFFICE DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE WEST HY E%ISTING LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LANG - APN: 227- 141-14 AND 66, ANO MAKING FINDINGS TN SUPPOR2 THERHOF P E CC ~^~i Clty Council Agenda v(((C~~CC~~~~;///(((ggq November 20, 1991 17 AESOLVTION NO. 91-214 2~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF HANCKO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE EAST PORTION OP SUBAREA 6, OF ETIWANOA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIPIC PLAN LAND USE HAP FROH HEDIVM (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PSR ACRE) TO LOW-MECIUM (4-8 DWELLING VNITS PEA ACAS) FOR APPROXIMATELY 10.34 ACRES OF LAND EOADERED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST AND SOUTH BY THE ONTARIO (I-IS) PREHWAY, AND ON THE WEST BY F,X IST INC MEDIUM DESIGNATED LAND - APN: 227-131-09, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEAEOP R. CONSI O O IRO Z$] PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 - CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Map within the Victoria Planned Community ee daecriDed below: 1. Prom Medium High Residential (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) to Medium Residential (e-14 dwelling unite per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 10.0 acres of Land located on the northeast corner of Ease Line Rontl and Milliken Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: Portion of 227-691-01. e. Fot 19.3 acres of land located on the north e lde of Baee Line Road, west of Victoria Park Lane, and east of the RV self storage facility. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: 227-091-14 and 15. C, For 21.77 scree of Land located on the northwest corner of Baee Line Road and the future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: Portion of 227-091-18 and 19, 227-091-20 through 22, and 227-091-43. D. For 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west elde of the future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Commleaion recommends approval - APN: Pottlon of 227-021-03 and 13. PA E F '(~~~ City Council A4enda November 20, 1991 (UL 18 The City Council will al eo consider Low Hediuro Residential (4-e dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land use designer ion foc he preceding four eubareae. 2. From Medium Residential (8-16 dwelling unite per sera) to Low Medium Residential (b-8 dwelling unite per acre) for the following eubareae: E. For 10.1 acres of Land located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue south of the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Planning commission recomnende denial - APN: Pori ion o£ 227-691-01. F. For 18 scree of land located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue between Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: 227-011-17. G. For 11,87 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Kenyon way and Woodruff Place. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: 227-011-2fi. H. For 23.03 accee of land locntad on the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lana and Rochester Avenue. The Planning Commiesicn recommends approval - APN: 227-091-51. I. For 32.14 acres of land located on the nottheest Coiner of Base Line Road and Aocheste[ Avenue. The Planning Comnlesion recommends approval - APN: 227-091-45 and 4fi and a portion of 227-091-44. J. For 20.895 acres of land approximately 892 feet north of the Puture Victoria Perk Lana extene ion on the weal side of the future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends approval - ApN: Port icn of 227-021-03 and 13. K. Por 7.895 sexes of land located between approximately 892 feet and 1,200 feat north of the Euture Victoria Park Lane extene ion on Che we et side of the Eutuce Day Cteek Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends tlenial - APN: Portion of 227-023-03 and 13. i r q ,~A PA f }_~~~~~ City Council Agenda November 20, 1991 14 The city CDUncil will a19o coneidet Low R801dential (2-4 dwelling unite peY acre) as an altecnatiVe land uee designation fir the preceding seven 9ubaceae. 3. From Medium High AesidenC lal (14-24 dwe111ng unite per acre) to Civic/community for the following euharea: L. Por 2.46 acres o£ land approximately 606 Eeet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-oE- way and approximately 321 feet oast of eh! future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Conmleeion recommend6 approval - APN: Portion of 227-091-18 attd 19. 4. Prom Medium High RBB idential (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) to Neighborhood camnercial Eor the following subarea: M. For 7.895 acze0 of land Locatefl between approximately 500 feat and 1.000 feet 0cuth of Highland Avenue on the we0t side of the future Day Creek Boulevard. Tha Planning Commission zeconmrende approval - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. TDe City Council will also coneidet Medium Aeaidential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternet ive land uee designation Eoc the preceding aubaren, Th0 Planning Commission recommends i0suenc0 of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. CONBZOERA~',SO_[{ Og E11V j„110NMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN- VICTORIA PLANNED COMl~UNaTY AMEN N2 ,j1-03 - CITY gP RA~iQH0 cUCAMONGA - A proposal to emend th! General plan Land use Map within th! Victoria Planned Community ae de9cr abed below: _. From Medium KLgM1 Residential (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) to medium Residential (8-16 tlwe Ming unite per acre] for the fo Llowing subareas: A. Por 10.0 acres of land Located on the northeast corner of Haas Line Aoad and Milliken Avenue. The Plenning Commies ion cecommende approval - APN: Portion of 227-691-01. Q~ i 5 ~: '(~~ ~ ~; Vii'" City Council A9entla (' ~ VjC"~J1 November 20, 1991 20 8. For 19.3 acres of land located on the north aide of Base Lina Roatl, west a£ Victoria Park Lane, and east of the AV self storage facility. The PLanning commieaion reconmenda approval - AFN: 227-091-14 and 15. c. For 21.77 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Baee LLne Road and the future Day creek Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends approval - AFN: Portiort of Z2T-091-18 and 19, 227-091-20 through 22, and 227-091-43. D. For 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west aide of the future Day Creek Sou levard. The Planning COmen iealon recommends approval - APN: Portion of 227-022-03 and 13. The City Council will a19o consider Low Metlium Resident Lal (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative land use deai9nation for the preceding four suha[eae. 2. Fcom Medium Aesldential (0-14 dwelling unite pec acre) to Low Medium Reeldential (d-8 dwelling unite per sere) foe the following eubareee: E. Far 10.1 acres of land located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue south o£ the South9cn Pac if ie Railroad. The planning Commies ion recommends denial - APN: Portion of 227-691-01. P. For 18 acres of land located on the east aide of Milliken 0.venue between Victoria Pack Lane and Kenyon Way. The Plannirtq Commies ion recommends approval - APN: 227-011-17. G. For 11.07 acres of land located on Che northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Woodruff Place. The Planning commies ton recommends approval - 0.PN: 227-011-26. H. For 23.03 acre9 of land located en the southeast corner of Victoria Pxrk Lane and Rochester Avenue. The planning Commise ion recommends approval - APN: 227-091-51, PA E L?~ C~CC City Council Agenda -rCY~````` YY~ n November 20~ 1991 L7 21 I. Foz 32.14 arise Of land located on the northeaat corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue. The Planning Comanieeion recortmende approval - APN: 227-091-46 and 4fi and a portion of 227-091-44. J. Por 20.895 scree of land approximately B92 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lane extension on the west Bide of the future say Creek Boulevard. The Planning Conmieaion recommends approval - APN: Portion Of 227-021-03 and 13. R. For 7.895 acres of land located Detween approximately 892 feet and 1,200 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lane extension on the we at aide of the future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Commission recc.Taende denial - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. 'the City Council will also consider Lau Residential (2-6 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative land use deeignat ion for the preceding seven subareas. 3. From Medium High Resident inl (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Community Facilities for the fallowing subarea: L. For 2.46 acres of lend approximately 606 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of- way and approximately 321 feet west of the future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: Portion of 227-091-IB and 19. 4. From Medium High Residential (14-26 dwelling unite per acre) to Village Commercial for the fallowing eubaren: M. For 7.095 crrea of land located between approximately 600 feet and 1,000 Eeet south of Highland Avenue on the west side of the future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The CLty Council will also cone ider Medium Asa ident iel (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) ae en elternat ive land use deeignat Lan for the preceding subarea. n PA ~'y9 g~-~y~~) ~J~y.r -'yy CitY Council Agenda L J(~y November 20, 1991 22 The Planning commies ion recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. RESOLUTION N0. 91-354 358 A AESOLVTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA~ CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUEARSA A, AMENDING THE GENEPAL PLAN LAND USE NAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLZNG UNITS PER ACRBj TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (B-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) POR 1D.0 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNEA OP BASS LINH AOAO AND MILL ZNEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT TXEIiEOP - APN: PORTION OP 227-691- 01 ORDINANCE NO. 469 (first reading) 361 RN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VTCTOAIA PLANNHD COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA pr AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH AHSIOENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) TD MEDIVH RESIDENTIAL (e-14 DWELLING UNITE PEA ACRE) FOR 10.0 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON THS NORTHEAST CORNER OP BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLI KEN AVENUE, AND HARING PLNDINGS LN SVPPOAT THEAEOP - APN: PORTION OP 227-691- 01 RESOLUTION NO, 91-355 364 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFOANIAr APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03. SUBAREA Br AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH AESIDENT111L (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWBLLINC UNITS PHR ACAS) FOR 19.3 ACAEB OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OP BASE LINE ROAD, WBBT OP VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEREOB - APN: 227-091-14 AND 15 P E ~~~~ City Council Agenda November 20, 1991 23 ORDINANCE NO. 470 (first reading) 367 AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AHHNOMENT 91-03, SUBAREA Br AMENDING TNS VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USB HAP FROM MEDIUM-NIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIVM (tESI06NTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PBR ACAB) FOR 19.3 ACRBB OF LANG LOGTED ON THB NORTH SIDE OF BASH LLNE ROAD, NEST OP VICTORIA PARR LANfi. ANO HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THHREOP - APN: 227-091-14 AND 15 370 RESOLUTION No. 91-356 A RESOLUTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03. SVBAAHA C, AMBNDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE HAP FROM MED IU}f-H: G7: RF.o 70ENTIAL 114-24 DWELLING VNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACAH) FOR 21.77 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OP BASE LIN6 ROAD AND THE FVTURE DAY CAESA BOVLEVAAD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS PORTION OF 227-091-18 AND 19, 227-091-20 THROUGH 22, AND 227-091-63 ORDINANCE NO. 471 (first reading) 373 AN ORD INANCB OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CAL IPORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA' PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 9'_-03, SVBAREA C, AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIVM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWHLLING UNITS PER ACRfi) FOR 21.77 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND THE FUTURE pAY CREEK BOULEVAADr AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-091-1E AND 19, 227-091-20 THROUGH 22, AND 227-091-43 / PA E y~,~'`J~ SI C~~~~' p~({~(r).)' City Council Agenda U Novem6ar 20, 1991 24 RESOLUTION NO. 91-357 376 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA D, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND VSE MAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (16-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACA6) TO !ffiDIVN RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) POA 7.895 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED BETWEEN APPRO%IHATELY 1,000 FEET AND 1,300 PBET SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ON THE WEST SIDE OP THE PVTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MA%ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP - APN: PORTION OP 227-021-03 AND 13 ORDINANCE NO. 472 (first reading) 37g AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA D, AM%NOING THS VICTORIA PLANNED COMMVN ITY LAND VSB HAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDBNTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) FOR 7.895 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED BETWEEN APPRO%IMATELY 1,000 FEET AND 1,300 PEST SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ON THE WEST SIDE OP THE FUTURE DAY CREE% BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - AYH: PORTION OF 227-021-03 AND 13 382 RESOLUTION NO. 91-358 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA E, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE HAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- NEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (9-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 10.1 ACRES OF LANG LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILLIREN AVENUS SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OP-WAY, AND MA%ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP - APN: PORTION OF 227-691-01 PA E ~~~~ City Council Agenda November 20, 1991 25 RESOLUTION NO. 91-359 385 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORN7Ar DENYING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDIVSNT 91-03r EVBARBA E, A ASQUSST TD AMSND TH8 VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE MAP PROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PEA ACAS) TO LOW-MEDIUM AHS IOSNT IAL (4-B DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) POA 10.1 ACR85 OP LANG LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILLIREN AVENUE SOUTH OP THE SOUTHERN PACIPIC RAILROAD RIGNT-OF-WAYr AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-691-01 AESOLVTION NO. 91-360 388 A RESOLUTION OF TNB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GSNEiUI. PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA Fr AMENDING TNS GENEIUL PLAN LANG USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RBSIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PHR ACRE) FOA 18 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON TXE EAST SIDE OP MILL IAEN AVENUE BETWEEN VICTORIA PARR LANE AND RENYON WAY, AND MAEING FINDINGS IN EUPPOAT THHAEOP - APN: PORTION OF 227-011-17 ORDINANCE NO. 473 (f stet reading) 392 AN ORDINANCE OF TNB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAr APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNSD COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA F, AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND VSH MAP FROM MEDIUM PSSIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITE PEA ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-R DWELLING OMITS PER ACRE FOR 18 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST sloe OF MILLIHEN AVENUE BETWEEN VICTORIA PARR LANE AND KENYON WAYr AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-011- 17 PACE ( ~(~~~ city council Agenda November 20, 1991 26 RESOLUTION NO. 93-361 395 A RESOLUTION OF THE CLTY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GBNERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SVBAREA G, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWBLL ING UNITS PEA ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) FOR 11.87 ACR83 OP LANG LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNEA OF RENYON WAY AND NOOORUPF PLACE, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-011-26 ORDINANCE NO. 474 (first reading) 398 AN ORDINANCE OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA G, AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RBSIDENTIAL (B-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PfiR ACAS) FOR 11.87 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTNEAST CORNER OF RENYON WAY AND WOODRUFP PLACE, AND HARING FINDING9 IN SVPPORT TNEAEOP - APN: PORTION OP 227-011-26 4~1 RESOLUTION NO. 91-362 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SVBAREA H, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-34 DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 23.03 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE 50UTHEAST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARR LANE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAEING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEREOP - APN: 227-091-51 ORDINANCE NO. 475 (filet reading) 404 AN ORDINANCE OF TNB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SVBAREA H, AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND U5E MAP PA City Council Agenda NovemGer 20, 1991 27 FROM MEDIUM RESIDSNTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) TO LOH-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) FOR 23.03 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARE LAME AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-51 RESOLUTION NO. 91-363 40) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIPORNIAr APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA Ir AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND VSE MAP FROM MEOIVM RfiSIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) FOR 32.16 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THS NORTHfiAST CORNER OF BASfi LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENVSr AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-46 AND 46 ANO A PORTION OP 227-091-44 ORDINANCE No. 476 (first reading) 410 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF IUNCHO CUCANONGAr CALIFOAN IAr APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMVNITY AMENDMENT 91-03r SUEAREA Ir AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USB HAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL X4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 32.14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUSr AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-49 AND 46 AND A PORTION OF 227-091-64 RESOLUTION N0. 91-364 413 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIPOANIAr APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03r SUBAREA Jr AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE NAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 8-14 DWELLING VNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLINO UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 20.695 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 892 FEET NORTH OF THE FUTURE PA ~~~~ CitY Council Agenda November 20r 1991 28 VICTORIA PAAA LANE EXTF,NS ION ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-021-03 AND 13 ORDINANCE NO. 477 (first reading) 416 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA Jr AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE MAP FROM HED IVM RESIDENTIAL (8-ld DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIVH RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING VNITS PER ACRE) FOR 20.895 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED APPRO%IMATELY 892 FEET NORTH OP THE FVTURE VICTORIA PARR LANE EXTENSION ON THE WeST SIDE OF THE FVTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP - APN: PORTION OF 227-021- 03 AND 13 RESOLUTION NO. 91-365 419 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALI FORNIAr DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA Rr A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELL INC UNITS PER ACAS) TO LOW- MEDIUH RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 7.895 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY 892 FEET AND 1x200 FEET NORTH OF THE FUTURE VICTORIA PAR% LANE EXTENSION ON THE WEST SIDE CF THE FUTVRE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-021- 03 AND 13 RESOLVTION NO. 91-36b 422 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONCAr CALIFORNIA, DENYING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA Rr A REQUEST TO AMEND THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMVNITY LANG USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-16 DWELLS NG UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 7.895 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED BSTtiEEN PAO '[~~~ City Council Agenda November 20, 1991 29 APPROXIMATELY 892 PEET AND 1,200 PEST NORTH OF THE FUTVRfi VICTORIA PARR LANfi EXTENSION ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE FUTURE DAY CREBR BOULEVARD, AIiO HARING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OP 227-021-03 AND 13 RESOLUTION No. 91-367 425 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMHNT 91-03, SUBAREA L, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LANG USE HAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PEA ACAS) TO CIVIC/COlDfUNITY FOA 2.46 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED APPRO%IMATELY 406 PEET SOUTH OF TH8 SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OP-WAY AND APPROXIMATELY 321 FEHT WEST OP THB FUTURB DAY CREER BOULHVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP -APN: PORTION OP 227-091- 18 AND 19 ORDINANCE NO. 478 (first reading) 42H AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNBD COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUEAAEA L, AMENDING THE V ICTORTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND VSE MAP PROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-26 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES FOR 2.46 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 406 FEBT SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OP-WAY AND APPROXIMATELY 321 FEET WEST OF THE PUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MA%ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-091- 1R ANO 13 RESOLUTION NO. 91-368 431 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CS TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA M, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LANG VSE MAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) TO NE IGNBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOA 7.895 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED BETWEEN APPRO%IMATELY 600 FEET AND 1,000 n• PA E ~~ City Council Agenda November 20, 1991 30 FEET SOUTH OF HI GHLANO AVENUE ON THE WEST SID& OF THE FUTURE DAY CREEA BOULEVARD, AND MAXING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OP 227-021-03 AND 13 ORDINANCE NO. 479 (fiiat Yeading) 434 AN ORD INANCB OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SVBAREA M, AMHNDING TH8 VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USH MAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING VNITS PfiR ACRE) TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL POR 7.895 ACAHS OP LANG LOCATED BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET AND 1,000 FEET SOUTH OP HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PUTVRH DAY CREEX BOVLEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SVPPOAT TFIEAEOP - APN: PORTION OP 227-021-03 AND 13 O. PllSL2C NEARINOS Ths following iteee have va legal publication or pvetivg requiroenta. The chair will open the uativg to rwaive pub lie teatiewnp. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAOHR'B STAFF REPORTB The following iteee do not lagellp require say public teetieony, although tha Chair yy. open the seating for public input. No Items Submitted. I. COVNCIL BUSINEBB The following itaa acre bwv requested by the Citp Comcil for discuseioa. Thay ere not public boring itue, although the Chair say open the weting foe public Lapul. No Items Submitted. PA E ~~~ City Council Agenda November 20, 1991 31 S IDENTIlIGTION O! ITEMS !OR NEZT M66TIIRi Thi• is the line for City Council to identify Lhe itaa tbep wish to diecva a! the neat .eetiag. Thew itua will not be diecuated at this casting, only identified for the aert casting. Z. COMMUNICATIONS IRON TR6 PUBLIC This L the tiN and pLee for the general public to address the Citp Council. elite law prohibits she Citp Council fraN addresaiag nap iuue not previouelp included on the Ageoda. The Citp COUacil up receive Gatiaonp cad ut the u!!er for eubaequaat petiag. Cooeate are to be iLNited to five eiautea per individual. L. ADJOVRNMENT M66TIN0 TO AOJOUM TO EZECOTIV6 866820N TO OZeCV88 PENDING LITIGATION. I, Debra J, Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify thet a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 15, 1991, seventy-[wo (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Dcive. o:aeme~seeeme~~e ^:<> - a:.ooo~~~<.~"a ee~amrrNeeM1a.ryry:~:~oa:na~ n N. N naeN• frNrm re e n nNn n ^p.e~ aM1.PerrvnaNaM1ePO:wneNanePerryn.nan.eer.Nan. a$eeaaaaaaeavovoaaesaaasaaaaaasssssessssaaaesas meeaee.aeaoe.aaa<aoa+eae~aaoiveevase~aooeoeaaeaeeaeo ~ . a . e • . . ..a. . . la. ZTp ry i J u M1e^~ p F M1•M apTi . OM1rya :N ~ ~ rNOm NPitNwWPNyn Pi~fJ INr U O ~ P W rin7uw.0. .a i. . aZZ.m:• ? O v vl OC'FF71t O~M1 JFWrPF. O OhNFS~M1 Y V`V `N JV Jr¢M1\s¢V~OO WI Y2f Glum ¢ iir W \ S w NiOi vCe¢NjNrJrNU JZJUNYnr n~ p)u O 2npnr~t ptpwnimRp zw~ r r • Iv°n poeziw'rowi°¢ry a zai~i~ NoNO.~.yrJJ..~o w •1 . w Nz. ~z zwJ:.zzrao _ riwNarNN wuw Y _O iN NpN ~. wf wpRp N. JN .P p ryy ~NOwO=un V •JwjajOOO¢wGiww JJV \t rti~fYJON~rNJ J i _ uuwi¢W=.r¢ uOVN„mN VVaO >V u Zw OiN000¢ZwS \StiYTVOrOH mM1WJwOOZOZVOjUO l` u .~ rJ zzzw Pr¢eNw¢ozNZ >iwzurM1:rzoozry z ee r2~wf6 »LL¢wNN:FM1Q wOpONfwWUtiSNO JM1wOOfO IvZ OaFwwr<wYw OwaNp fVw~WWWWFNiNJO7Wn.WwjwJ JOw~Gi n0 N Npu wi O¢¢¢N.NOpvVOOpN¢ ¢prSN6)ili N6Va6 HSrS V Z S J r Z N UV_U u Y y Y N V~ u SF ~U u •Ow Z ~ LV~6 N w o u N2w \Orwu) V. )i f n2 NN UwNZ )a N N WOOrW U _¢v wi.M1~wtiNri>¢Of O WNiO O~w NNw u u„7wNJZW:Vao.p O LWr ^ ui¢W J==su:=iNO 6V}06 vSa rOYrW wVV• OWNSZO Na_UVrrpr.>NOOOZ .ZNf M1V O wrn J ¢mNww M1rrn wsNU NN¢VN'M1W y6~NOw. Zw v ¢ yS'~~W~¢¢O~~N~f~oZ~=\.S• iJN ~ ~ypJ r. pp ¢UOWWSUUOrrp O FOJ...a N NIwYOIJJ¢¢ r ..J\:.JJe~r)VV ONIVWWZapG QO¢i.__ W_W_M1_w :f>V Orr ONNOJ. JFtrsm=UM1)wY M1 l •:. n ¢:± JVNW>pJ7WwW¢ FJSV=J".Jpv r Y 0O v¢ Vr.n w~~ : N em r ...wzrrJJ oaoooo z .z. z >NJ ff..f. i.i~.~• aaeeeouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuW uooo .e nrPOrrvoNOa~aramn..rarNr.nnfrywr.rvaeerr o OryTrelnT.nOnan.a^M1¢OnM1nM1 naNa m mN>~nnn.rvr armm~Nn¢nNn• nn.nNrnnen f rv nNi rva eearrn Hrynerarara a ryarawaaaryo we J ~ °:.: rmNOOdoaa.nrv_dondddooPnrvemd~Ne.PeeemmPefraNNeNNPe.m Nmoeonoe Peooenerem•.N dfONP m<~r mae~a.amP'sam~l:: aoa. _: e$e °o$~..m°..°f.~:.~°..o°. .P°.w::'m' Nor.P~nrvma nareP eW.Wdfafdddddaaaaaadafaddn.d«e~ddaadadad:<::ee:..aad _.• O. .. . . .i.. .. . j • ~ d \o a ZJ i • Pry w Ni e . a~°.m. f . z~ H- a rm-io P ma. s Ir . ~~ W r i _ zr~ 'm fro .. P .ii w ..~ i ~„ , . ii nn WMW~r: ~~ ~ o LLSrrw T j IIII VNVJ rJ r?IN OJ~2u~NJJ ISN yy M N ~J mNF yZw rl N O~ n.ei rZiNW pnNWw JaJJ2~Ww ninrN wWN \T2arJf r_F Ny v 0a?W..f n_r v4¢O YttMr w F ' V,n~eeLL0=3F.7W P• : WO 2 LL n n i• fjr=VrN _ n n NnNNti Ni 7a SnNJ 2 w f ryNw_ JYm F1pUn V`==M1WJVTI 61iiw rJ~JO _ W V nN 7iw Oi~W2 SICw wZmJ ~ VUJ r0 W _ rrT _w_J_OJt w :N Jn l7jVVVai UePJYif lJ W rVeiNZf.. V n ~ v ¢~Di~~ VwaTVOiji if y 0 OJNOO/] T JevvOOiff~roJ nQZiae2 p6 w~fwJO;i zzS2J~ U??Z~ w nrNwwN2 S i ~.• FnGnVY G ' :[: eLL eW4 elari:eaen..oa~ ..WOrecryzznniznW~rLLwr OSLLLL4QNw:W.n~`fnyv JIN4Y1 ~+ i JN `v OwFa~06NWY\~ rT>ia6uv VIJLLOanuVUOrT n'66rrnUVnOJVmfNJr vNnOnww~te0 iU Y „ n V v Z a r _ 3 tJ 2 O JN JJ• ZSrA 2e r in n v V w n_Y V W ~J n UiJ _ • Jug ~ "rte rl Ep V2Of2 NiW'0J Z ti; J JRO f2r i .~ y0<u jef YnWPV p ~ r'n2 r 20 Sf if _ .m0 _ _ r nnnw 4i.i riav~J -~+L LLv~' O N ify~f; J9YNffL'J a~tLL [tNOJnNFiOZ2 Yfwh in fJJ~2~ HOV •NO~fin=JWruu• ~V CNf:n iOi riNN NeJVWLr ¢vw wnV'JFwM1:6vtl w LLeVwZ7 O rLM wp .V '~ ii'+~nnNaN=rindJw~auJJir pezzz'~nez.no ueuo~~niWrr iu i woneoo'ow "'LL O.far._.ooer~z fafWZSYe of f f r..epr ~i• 000 wW44 au nrrnlm Y.[.n YzJJJJJJJJ J[ NdnNd PIP.JNnnON NOdmP•d rOTn P.-iN NPrNPw• OpOd ~~~ nn Hil~n rynn~~rmnPd vad mryONmOmPrO df mryff0 ~aad~m a N11• m fNfrld rvN Nlmfnw •w nn •I nm• n • ~ :.: amnmamaomoo_PaPNmaNhNPNmPOnPNnmanr.0arhaohemoPmPNma a.h ova o~.+e: :.n mHa e.~.oi~oyMOro~oae.. .. .. Pae Nm n ~i n JonN/ram ahmPOnNOIm NmhmP TanaFmPO'IV n1fN POrnTlnahmPe• ¢^Y a~aJa O„a P~ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaooaooaoeaomaoaaaa<avaaaaaaoaaoamam .. m m ml fs u Z ¢i J V J l u z `I i Ob f VO a .aia e? n F nPpnn00 hP_nJ v am n ZiPnOJ O iJ w2 I ZN Slmnim ZZwm m ¢YWhY6¢ n JpnZWwNfwwZFPhwm= n tmf VLLl SOVJwNhVOV\V Ofm JiJll hJ~ f\I JSN •i J wOi¢ u0/Y WhrJWw fV Uw ilh NIN n0<6 v aJfi• 63 w O LLO ZII J JS O_O/TUi mFW~OV6nw~rin O OU¢ h mZSNr VLatOm\ h• m M Z O V O ZY.nNn ~SLLF NrNiYFYLLI ZZNZZ6i h_ nlOii m_ZP2mhpH TWWw JJ ¢WJHV• VLLwr=6~ m' O 6 wOJN VYOOSVVf ViV OVOw00 OJWOOZ6WfwVw<Z LL mN< ~ 1 9 V ip VV USm fOJNp rhmaf ¢ZO¢7JZnMry¢OWYI NZfZwZ w2n<LLS¢OU¢¢m ¢ ¢^f Z¢Vp6¢ <pj¢wj wVw~u~yw>66<mw<>¢1N nff nupi¢OJ~~wN¢¢O m y0a Of 00 iWPP p¢VLL¢¢Zf h¢ ZilpfutupunOU p6a V J m ? n , n w _ _ ih N < 6 t~+ S Z O yJa¢V n w 2~ SO¢ Sa 00 NJOSw V S Op m p aiY V O vu wVJ vJOWwi OZ Wt ¢uSf <Jfa w VhOZn 91 <Lr Nib wiv ff 7n Jeo :oe WZ6 60IJOMVJO¢SJ ONw yi¢ ~'l •rrSw JZJ I [OO±OfSUw'p ULLNS~UVmifO¢riiJn ZSN Niu VOVm fi ~[• NVZOOOYZV ~Jna ¢iN ZOwwwJw •¢O WZVO¢Z OZNFwwiiSyO iWOFw UZraOF~tiini~m~uru u'O<[OhV6 Nf wrii00iiZO NHmNiZiS2<VfVV n00'J ftmw r+ROP¢m¢<f< r »ffUVV2nZ00 :ii iiiiiiisiiiiii<z iiatafnppppaoppppsppm¢¢aawio- ¢¢NNNNNNNNNN haNnamamNnNmNnanaa~nN. moPNnnemNNaaohnhPm ~ rPP naP •annPmnnnn~-nNne. O O P OwP ~NmNNmnhhNPnaN nNr~TrNrYiN NrTywn •Z~ n •aNalaa`~nNmaaN NwN nNn n 3 J .on... e.peoP ~e..ere oor POPN OpPVI1NrNNNn Vii: P°w °eeoeoeeoe e.°.~~~ NNn eaaa<aaea..aoavo... V. . .• i~ S i V O • i i fN W_ v NR ais°Wp •. i cNa e ~i0 N i`Y 'Ji W .ri aV1 OJ ii~ N~ JO'J .1NMw Tiu Ir nYJ~Irr aOV ~yW..Wl1~. l6~.i W:Pai eo• viii e'a.zsNNZ Z• CiJ ie.r~ow PzWw m~p'i~ wu 'J RVSO .i66~J u n}Z OiN n wVJ aUewNwuNN< ipapJOnP.J ~• Jp orrzpuuOC~4siiuLLiuVN I S rn N = C pY NS Y Y Vr~ e J Y NV C to J. ~n W OVYW .p J.~[. 'ue~ Nor :`P eJ iOOr ~O~'SV LLIWWYW VVV2rWtirrf WQy>N~ w~. MJJNNYRM pOCFr rpYG. NNNNNNNN» sif aY if~• dN.NnP~NrPp.npyP NIp r n~rvnnN •Y~ w TN N nlrye N NN y O <hP a u~e Li iW0 O~ V W u: 1t ii ~:/ O eee OOOOO.een.paaYOP000neeePeneoonee Nmn .OOIOOhOONOOnPPOa00oN000nOPO00NON O NOPaONPOONMehONPaNNOa00PrPOPNNOnh P. N N N. afaNhmNfhOPhwee P• mnNn r w w r• N •r 1 h A JP<NOPN.NOIO•rNm{NaNOPOMNnaN.hOPONNnaNahYPO~NnaNr.POr• 9Yo NNMnNM N.NVry/AaNNNNNNMNNnNwrfi rfiiNNwMNMryNNNNNNryN OaaaaOaaarrOrrr rfara{raarar00{arrarararraaaa~earaarV I I 1 1 2 O f 1 W V a1 N Own w\W Nwn\ N {\ W~rNNrmi r• V. \Pw w wr• OI•!n iN P\•r\ VO \T p `Yr1• W li rwsa~~ay ni e: .mi~m~ n\ _ ~ °s .Nanr I'n~ aNa O »O •i ewwy \M W \i :NJ f•\WFO S `H a.12 Wh:RNWr V(ra NiV JfP G ~Nr J nVNVrriiv\ Wi>Wr •ffY1 \rliiiVN iWi••U vlv w(w•`w a p~l~+ro e r OW•< v VV~ n hJl V \ if Y O NN•nOjOJ J \ F ih J \ ••WOJ_Y iY {Z6Vre1'JIYiIY N uJUwiW:M1 m y fi w P iOyZN VL VnFYYwPO rfSY Y iNWCir• ~rv p i Zr, S\ ii0 9ONw r WN \•~ZSNO O :Y.WrP 06 W J O WN~O WW 'J OOLJNiN Y Vw(^ ~: _ ~ ~O i• r O~ WLW Y.WO O+ZW J M j f6 M•Y.00W OOrw• NiYO=• O OYWWm a rV w ?:O: • O ZJYWW Y. Jah\ ni y V OH • YO i{ NV OViWNN ~ J Wf 7 f h NN W WhOYr WV W iVNiWO VO(Nil {VO W 1 2 S VNV~ yONfhWJVN VJ O_V i\OM_jY_ iON 1 ( W rr h • O YO JJJ i•rN: Iw Y. Ni Wz WiWO~N.YWIW=_O CJ O . •VN. iOjOy fW riiW W•ii O N~WNYy••i Oi NVYV r \ ~ o YN •f•Nr Or{u OwwJY WI•VOhO {{ieUh ryJo • { < W ILrOh Vr JiiGMhOVhNJViih{ViN iW0 i• • N : h V\J•'•iNWVY6rJhiJri•rOW(00 N'J WhiWYVrrN IaJ « hW iWNJYZNYNhnW{O•OP<• Wrr(i WVIM1YNJiW{•rU aJ N V Y VY fWNYV~iNOYYO~<NMfCN~YV~~(\6nYNJiY0Y.n2N BPS O Z J < WV y VN r ( DO Vi 0 tlV (N h • 0s N0 N hi S yy~ N•Jr MZ ~Wyy p< wN W i~ i~ t< ii L~ IJ O J ~ ro :u up he ( V NhW V Nif •l WY WO ~N.i. Nzr •u Ws ~Y r aw iNV fJ OS •N M_ WVpi h <p i < hJ•r Wp W J~N~rOY pWY r r •VwenVi:wrt<OWNJOVrrZOVfn V Z YNY i a 2 N rli• rVOOJN Wr •SWMJ:MOt wf W<yi Ju <Nww40 i0 •Yl i.WJ V rJWW<Y~i .S u p < wr heN~ w.a6a •J i IY-i sar •ip~ J UN rpVpOW6 •I V~••S •r fOWNYO •JrOOMf J ZUW Fi0 J. ~0Y00•yri` Y<Yr•N• C6V(r0 iZ«W(pNW •r O = V6 rJwOiZOOr rOwr{WtYY• VN•WiOw Z'JfWINWONft ~tlu W < U( WJZE.f 6NNNNJY¢NOY.00 JJ(Y 6rti{j0(fY7p O F JO JJJ:ON:: .a<.WwJOfff.f ttuWwi 000006 OV. J J N6 <. « .< .. 00 0000Y0WVVVVVVVJVUVVVVVVU VOO wma.ramahhnrrnh~eeren YPaemNhna o e wi Y'I~aen°Nrara.rar.nPrahNrn~mNaNnra'aNNrhN .! han~Nmn n anPN.n n .. n m e" mmN NN.. •re e! mYaa Na rnnr n V i V O r• :NP u~o LLH S)v Oa a aws >Z• \~ 21 W~ 01 2• J• •2• !\ a• •Z1 Y Y Y • ~ j• 1> j• 4• q• W~ ~s, c~ n OTnMn bOnNOTNnONNNOONpoier•N OOrN00lOON000NOOOnrO00Nr NnPMO ON• NarTOM nNTeOO NONNPNTn+nhONNaheTo Pa aN <Yra+aweN N~nl i°NnrhTrNJN+wntlnnTnaaNin:nl+ m N nPn•• rN wrf P N N •• •• n0 TN VN+nawOrNnrNtlNOPOJHMrNehOpOnNNN TrnOnOlO•CC•NMV NppO~NpO••N aNMNNMMNNNNryYNNNNNNNN~NNNNNNNHN Ti N~pi•rwi~N NN A+1~mmTnnnw°I~m~ ooaaaaaeaavaaaea~oaaaareaa<aaaaaaaoeaar<avOOeaceaaaao !! 1 tl \ N 4P j FZ<\ h ~ w whT ON YOT P w\\ PPP P6 r a JY\ sh m wTr \\\ \z. ~ nN ~ OWr WP ~\•• TmTrT w~r aVn• a•• ••F w =rlwww JHr\iw\rNJ w\rf y~NP j y V N! r•Vi WYWJJ iaHrIMM wmZN{W\ ajY pWLL PWY W \ 00 \ a\V Wr6 • \sV • i•LL r\LL WWW4w f:wy6<Y(•• 6LLJ WJ~Z YM M V a• YLLlrss> 3JPY••W N1 1 JMIWLL it Y LL_JJS OJ~1 W•J HOOW NO JJ N\ !JJ wY :wN wOi JON ••h Z a ~„allYLLl FNLLiVI OJ YYY >WNJ !M Z~W Z 1 1 ILL mjVZ\ Pw O wJr ~u <JWy~ Wos • i NWwo wnnia la ~~ 1 u° J ajiJO~>\wNWii •O V ±••••MNwIW 1 i1N1~ OiW NViV<LLO s iYW« a6pYa r(i <f~wi tW N VOsN Of \NVZZZfN ZOO 11.Y ^VaVaOW••i TI~W n JNN WJ WV OJW 1 NMWYW>\WwOM M1Op!___ tOYOWO'J YPO~n iOV•• VOYOJ O iNf (PF FOja >WhOYaM[<\ i i0a rNWe~~ 6 OZS1S qfa Sa4NJ77ah JY <Q ONafi w~lY rfa LL WVNWV V••{WFV JWWNILWWN Y'ZNY W N Vp60W LLSZ i VO<NN• OiiNULL LLuV< .! WYJLa\VJwJ °tl O`NWPOw O ii yW iW YJiji 9Y OWO O;VO O (OLLt Oa2YJ N ~JrOpWNNJWWWhONi000Yh OVNj ZgWWOii Nv Y••O7>TNiWUJwYi< J WWWWYi! NNywW <OOOV>Y 7i » ON<i Z!<JJWr « JO+w Of ii<VrJJOYO~P i Z•LL i<DO °NOW •pYZMINVVOaOOOaVihh2000aN \tC:W6\n:iY VWWJY iZYa60JMJFM••MiWZFN 1 JJ 9JJJF>Y>7 2J YJ>•• a0Y<aVWlV9JiY22~Jh Wy.24pJJ9YJJJifaiiC<>=~q<•1 YUUiZWJ lta0i°ORI Oh[VCCN »Y°.w ONYWP2<f RSSZVCUV'ZlYi2rN~>NVnj LL J i Y C V Z ~' U O 2 W ~ p i iN i Y Z O Z 9 V NY o2 Z al O ~ ( > 1n O ~ V W i h Z Z S V JNS JJ T<rvNi 2 F O WO w >N Wl<YJJ O ii2<J U i7 < NS Up(i <WZii <p W<Wi J OiOV• WtT2VV0~ HZZ Z O ~~ OO jai OfVNU YZZNT(OWW J° f101> N< J ~N<iZ w Z6 hJ v~YNW60jiYWOO Wi HtlOhY<wrr ryhf HVi WiaH OtJ :o•-O> OOWWWLh '•V ah N VNZJ NWP• OOpON OW Jw •wN •Z IOTWhIFJ`> Ni• J i~~! l >6~ ••nn •rOpZ <l•W<aWN •<jNZiOJ(O<SZ<ZNN<_W _Ww• «OlWjW~M[ i~uf.iOiuY hNOiN •jWOaW• OVyWYJf6i( SWWJtCiNW(NUiF JJ(FV NwJV~tWOOJVwJOhpUW i VU~N tNO~ N(i JNNY •<W••Y••JOOaaI<OOh9« <WWWWOOUVVOVw •MiJtO 0000000 WwwWW WIlYLLW1L IlYLLWLLLLWVVVVULiLiLiZLLYMr'IY YYiZYM TryNONON••OH+Nr+OPT++a1n vNlONnO NNeNTHPPTn NVFOa NNNNOaNN rN~nNa+NPrr+FT NNwrTnrymNrTONhhOnerh TOn+T IO°OP•a rr•OT^NNryv^ /TN w NnNeN+NMT ••N NN+n NTT+r v••m r• T W v C) O V <ya vl u' °Ns r:~ o: :: ~. ii i ~ ~ • i ~W •Z •Z ~V ii :oeeeNO>~~ror~ee~e~eveo~ha:~:~see~e:° Nee.e~~nom ~o~:r-;~;oo.:me~a f..r n '° N ° N rmr yy ryr NN a .yiNa.y.»"":_o:'~"~ m rr N r .. .N ~maNanmwmrNnaNan•werNnaNenmwoJNmamer•eworNnaNenmwOrNm W "I~~:I~m ~^,n an ,?~~',~~mT~~Am~mmmm~~mmR°A >v<oeeaea.ireaaaare aaeaaaaaooeaaaaoreia+oe<+o<a~ioevaa<ao s iiM • • m r • . • • m \O y w • P ~ ~ NNO \\ N\ \M= m e`n\ma 6 „ ° wi ~_ \rr O Nn nJ V J nym.•r M Mn yOVS a J••\w:-21 \i O Npfw N W p J N nw n• in p ONMVVZm N JV= VV• ppn ew\ ' \Z f\ •W p :<VFOW \ SF roe p p Npp~pl ZOIw•y« W • YnU r °NM Ir mm`up • JI fZ ~: JpiN IJ NVJO~•6 r pOJ >~F ONpr _I IWIf W_ si W•F i JNnW Wp\ ZiYpi~ per r•\VNZpw W nm°NNZO N >+O W ~~ le`~~o3 .• zW zwmeW WW r-WZ:rf NW •JS i fmwNWf lfLLfNl:• O ul UNWr•~N• yiur ustLL \im tIL •ojp • »FZY ° ~w nW m »MOfN N ~~o^WpeWy sW a ooW<ym w• •• YWNIi fz:z N zN zpy oFr~ mW uu°~•WWZ° <•yn~ fNMU• m•wl• vVNV YVJmy~iiVi\ iFnJOWrFiVN::V V YS lib VJ ~°uY i -J 1 _ _ JZm C• y VwNpWUPWV6ViJ p NNNUJUNeOFONnwiLN O Tmm O OYS JNFWpWV\ M ZrrNyVWOW vW °nV Mn n0 i <F __J NV nl ZO=„St00 JrN>WJ WNneiVm u r itiiw jy m O •m Niimw z°aii•oa~. •umi °. u'~i i~'n .. ~NCeiJiWes.y. iai ul a°oyPf ° _°rrryMmN uNZZw°z YeWary ssrfmm uNrzs uN°mz V wrV2>FY< ~ JYJJni •S ref Nyy•y» • \\f wZOVWNJOJO\NwV•,m VPV~JJ WfVp001p\•:ltrVWWN~VVNOpO 6lwnyZpvOlpjf~ptp•Sii Yi~•NifpNi l2 i°4V<OG••N~OS~pONivpZi~OJiF m f w V _7 w m ° r e n •n ~_ N Y _ s LJ W•Wi ~ y vul N NV p ~ rp Ni J t YYU N O J :CC € W W a •• Z V y J p y •~ a 6 2 J y V V • n. 1- p wrZi SYJW °V N W iW~yZ•ViN nZZ :~H ~• 6V> ffOinVf WZ V y\•Zim ~i6~~n•~wHy W'IYSOa'Y J:=t~l=On OJiO NJ f6if6Z>Z OOnOJWVJ7F NwW>pZZJ2 VOw_ Zi• _ Z90f OZVN VJ J WZeWwf iOJV~Vyi600- OwVMynJ f\fV •V VJWZMJOWNNO~v; VS NJUUNJj1H wNy • JOZ •f ZOfWFNVJV wOr Wf VVyWVFV v w Y OO J~YNNVVVW~yYVJi • °>VZ w YYtihOv fWZ~Vp ZvNNIOVnwJOVVy`If yZJnY2p6Nr~n00 Oefffv v yiw`i'000 w~we JZ Nf •W MnOOVZVVu JJJJJJJJZiZ%ZZiZ Z ZZZZZZZZZi20000OpZpppppppZp6Zf O .IP NNm mnPNONmNONNrNnNmOeNOaeNe nmOaNONa n eaNn~:N.rw ..+NNeNPam::nNr~rNrN °. i'e"~aTry°n mN armwNaNaarr Nia.°.:~N• n°a NeNry °nm wl '" •. ammNmNn• aimmi Nrm n .. ~m O_ w Ya V¢OI =~r io°e Z/ • % .°.: •Z• •i• •S• ~:/ OONwONOnONONPP ON~n ONn FON•w Nme~•NDPiN nan .• • O s nwN mN w V « N O m w0000mwOONO0000PO0oO7e OOmONi00Y00000Pnn0000 « oi0 mPnTOSOOw N1VNNm minONOPOYNmiOVOeOPPPPPPP iPi000:+00000HN+v::: nnnnnmmenn °n ne °n mn°Nmnmmmmnmmmfia is+i+•i OVOa0000aVViVOOVVVVVVVOV<VVVOVVVVVOVOOVVVVVVVOVVVVVi !1 \ 2 Ph F O F 1 r V \ W! OL\O! Y •Y V V • •t Zr `nnf0 e M V •W 1.Y P _V O VS Y 'J JY N fV VrV WWNIWO VIZ LeLLF ! n mawN «W 'o elu r=orW r V:JN±LN NW!¢ JN6SrWV0 NNNUi J:! : LL NuNf O •~ OMJOO 61V1 ! J F V PhM'eJNPiiaLY N~>~W\WY O ;n~m0 nMV~F VNN O iN v oWLL\hLLNJwNOlv:LL~N LOWO O SOOY if v• WLW P a2ss J Di Wi ShvN WLW eII II Ww u ~ooi>.h u+u~LON .~h! O • slaLD e o •D Of iJ vOiY~~Y i N:M w0 il0 L OSYYZO NW¢¢FWN YjWiWrtV NYWN OWO hDVwOilOf w {OnJnO a M>r0 _W L1m Yw`O iN yLYYiYWWw ¢i Z u:NLLWfuW NW NNL iY V! 09J O i WyVi VY JUV rN iV0 Z «UDIILY ISkYiiyVYi iVV VN„vr60hNV=0_iw D' MF Of!• iii vOiL iWi~ iW=`W „„rW W'00 ¢ w2~0 NOONifw fj ~~~Of ¢Y •• VNi ~O Li1 W vtii0 Wr JI:jhORiiJVO OrOLiNJ! OOFOYFr000YF i Ya¢ rJ OwJZr O hh~f N m i1hNf WWjwiJYJJMJJJJiJ uJ N WWeJIIWVJOIii w 9W~-J VJO JYJOYJJ »Ji w:f Vf ZWI: 9hYf ±;OOWYYO O~ if0\f9OOWtlOOYY lfJ>¢NO NhONN2 VVW>Yw VfiN Nii2iiZMff 6i2ffW• O i i !M O VVJ~S i V 6iODi Y YV _ J h_F__ _ n V V • wW p uFDOWW iW J iW i S NiODLW WJY i SI i>9~LL uOWIYVW O YVLOJYLJN vWVY00 pif Y•Ji~>iD VST ¢OLL>VYVV •SVi LLw D i i Y~D• LSJ•Li nLYVw fWWWWDlf YL1LOfN J NSL •Vi000OViWV DY• hf Z2nVVC LL Vie~WfWV~V lIUVUWWLMYtO tt¢Ntltl¢Ktl¢tlNmNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN YVOYNPOPnwO VNnNNNmm m«« NNOmnNTO•mNNnm TSB N V N J i O E a :i H h 1~ 1YYi ih ouiW YJ u fr Z6• )LYi F~f7JV WiW iL iW i6NY O •ryy Y •.W '• 9JL VwhLwyO~iNVO >~ h>YhYNNN2 WIY •[JFY fIfWOLL•fWJ VUWJY¢WfJ~VUiFiYV OVVJV ViWOfWiJwt OOfY~OZiVY NNNNNNNNNNYhYhhhhYhhY77 TmONOmPmheT_NpNmmhnYnnNm nlwwNNnINmN ~mP00 NmNN N Nnm•mmm S V iNm ~fsi< u'a ei S~~ ZLLO <00 o.N.s ~s, w: ;, . e aeNeNNN :on~.e..w P• OINaONT• <~ ew+.ennn a ~i .. N~ N i i ~n.PO~NnaPal-aP ~z~ Wii+iii+iiiNii aaaaa<aoav<a.~•v i Ws Nz• ~• • LV_ S 'N V » Vi •[J\ ~ >fWM_M P~WWn IVNWN S P<O~O WIN \nY wo\a~ ~a>>.~.: ws aY..u • .nv r.Y. .o .s<i z 1- i WJ NfWN N• 1V SO_i iJ iJ WSSYWOLLW w{N fff.Z R O• JN I NiS 110 N• IJNOC) NiNiVSPnW w»fJ 7.nN NNSOJY.)OWa~i ~Y~ Pf.OS.y F6n.Y ti= NV N = •O~ MVH~»wP<N •)• J+ OWV •O`OY 01"WjWJeWWYJ. i.~.i « ozaeuzsofoa i > i F J Y a s Yz V YOV ~ OVS ti 6 N JVUtW Y f WOOSti _ fSf 00> ~ SO• Y>WO •I> rS YF~Y ) VWWWLL<V V< •J' • <iVOi • OJON JS ~>< _ • J~~N>F•[npJO W %i~ NSJ. NJ6WF 'S .6Y<O<<WNWWW •i• 7~J0)>S)))YNN •a..nPf P..e of N N NTTNa n N •W G c~ ,q J4h£i 2 X 6 Y fv Z 3 .^ ff_ Fc r Y Rk £ e "_ TB P~3a. R.~°; ""S: ::f4: ,3:.P e6:i :8 :" ]S2G• cc.~k ~S:-Y ~~:: ~.'~. '. L2:~ ~4^ ?$y..E 1 ~ ~~ `, ~, ~~~~ ... _e .-... - ~ ~a;3_ „ k 5~ €c Vie. ~..: .: ~ m; mrr,... ., _ = mc~~ i 4... _ omc m i ... r .. .n o~ m~8R m m _ a ~£ed8^n g' .m.'~'m ~ P' _ - _ - Sing 3 ~_ Y _ _ ~~s~ 9 P. o i4 ~~a~ 6' fi °m _ £ _ SN__ ~ .Afifizr - _ '{ _ .. .. ~~ S. S I ° ? i ~I FSGe~ _ .,X -- _ _ .. .- .. _ :' 3' ... :'GW> R f r I1 ~~, g ~' S ne Yids ~i F ~ _ ~W kT 7 i Y F 1 Y' Y~ s z= w?. ^ ~ s_ eS RR'~ - 5 v _ gs ae - ,. , e. _ _ ~ e ~~ m __ ^_ as ~ss sr ;, Ys ~e z y:;msP - 3' s ~ - . _ e ~ ~ k ` ' °R mq ., _ - a ~ ~e P.. ~~. ~ ~ S' v. n._ - ]' 4 i .T~ _ ;~In ~:. ~:' { Sv. M .. YY~Y> ..- ^ 'V' A E:cG~ .. .. :: v.^.,.... .. r,G _ Xi y' e W !. 4. 4 _ _ .. 5, ~~ _ gv ti _~ ~ Y ~ 1 ~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ' `~ "~' ' DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Jae O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Val Buena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: SUMMARY VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ETIWANOA AVENUE, LOCATED NORTH OF WHITTRAM AVE (APN: 229-151-15). It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the vacation of a portion of Etiwanda Avenue as excess right- of-way and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to record same. The City has received a request from a property owner on Etiwanda Avenue, located north of Nhlttram Avenue, to vacate an excess street right-of- way. Pursuant to a building permit in 1978, a portion of Etiwanda Avenue was dedicated by the property owner to the City for future widening of the street. The dedication resulted into 60 total feet on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, measured from street centerline. The property owner Ts now requesting that the vacation occur. The sub,T ect street right-of-way vacation is 10 feet wide and 330 feet long and is located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Whlttram Avewe (see Exhibits "A" and "B"). On October 23, 1991, the Planning Commission determined that said vacation would conform to the General Plan and recommended that the vacation occur. Section 8334a of the Streets and Highways Code states that local agencies may summarily vacate (by resolutlon) an excess right-of-wAy of a street or highway which is no longer required for street or highway purposes. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~ Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WB:,)h Attachment RESOLUTION N0. q1-,33Co A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF ETINANDA AVENUE, LOCATED NORTH OF NHITTRAM AVENUE WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Artlcie 1 Section 8334a, of the Streets and Highw4ys Gode, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of a street or hl ghway as excess right-of-way herein more particularly described; and NHEREAS, the Ctty Council found from alt the evidence submitted that said portion of street is na longer required far street or highway purposes. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLQiS: SECTION 1: The Council hereby makes Its order vacating said portion of street as-Town on Map V-120 on file in the office of the~Clty Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The subiect vacation shall be sub,iect to the reservations and except o~-ii' aRy, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date this resolution 15 recorded, said excess r g t-of-way no longer constitutes portion of said street. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resol ution~recorded 1n the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. ~~ v°',NG q ~cn"ION 1°c LoT.~+~-~ 9u TF?GT 'L!J2 -' - ••- '=~.u7ANA AR~.]W R~ViE i(-.~GI'''r2,c WRG~p ~;. l-,~K/=! 5° `~' OF Mrar~ GPG-rE5 II-15, ~A1J PER NA(G~;!-o C0.:I.1TY, STgYE I CF LALI F02rJl A. I L v''~ ~ ~'~ I -O 1 - - i ~~ -.,..,„ !~ I ~ C~_9~ 16~~!6 ~ L~`i-151.14 i I __ 1 1 _I i I r 0i ~ S i 'o A i ti ,- s v~ V crl'T .lF E il5 i. 2/w p rt s u9 ~ ~> > N I , C I 1 I • ~ _ (tc~9.311) (349.31' ' r __ (3~0, __ Z lez~_~:: ~: c,i ~ ~~ Q i 3 ---~ I • I • _ , ',~ _'` 2c I ~ Ivi - - FESStpp I c, n~i I 1~l N ~ ~~~(. ~~F.~ll i~. ~//j~~~ ~'! Z2 .IL 1. 09 i o ~ 9 I h ~ !~ ~'. 9 i Ca ~~~ ~ N i s No. 20700 m lel N ~ S G ~ * E%P. DATE 9 93 ppI ii- ~g (°hl 04) ~~ _ lq n ClV1~~~,0~P ~ 'g WHITTRAM AVENUE o ~ i ~;OTES: ( ) WOiGATES p,ECA2p PE2 M.6. 31~U•16 ~ ~C'~•`~ INCiCATES C7t157. p54 E~i5oR PARGE~. NJ YI FiE25 PER- C:JJn~7y A° ~oN I.+E2NARDiI.IO n55E6sc(i. ,cam°`~"~;~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ``' ~ ~~~ EXH IF~I i ~~6 ,.~~ - ~~'~ ,- ~//FGA i ~O'~i ~;' %W ~ ~~ WY _ E X B I B I i "B" ~4lCfiTTOi: CF' Rl GiiT-Oi-i~iAl' Bdin y^ a portion of Lot 93i cf Tract 2102, titled "i~ontana Arrow P.o ute Tract" as shover, on man filed in Hoo:c 31 at Pages 11-15, inclusive, recorded in the office of the County Fecorder in the County of San Ee rnardino, state Of California, more particularly described as follows: Beira the east 10 feet of tine west 60 feet of said Lot 43i of Tract 2102. ~._.~. . >, ._.. ~.,y.. ~•~i4: . 'J z/ y ,f Ho. 20300 EJIP. OATElL=L ---- CITY Or RA\CHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,^- ti DATE: November 20, 1991 _ ~ 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council - ~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager i ,I FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer SU&IECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT F011 THE INSTALLATION OF STREET ~ IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-HAY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ROCHESTER I AVENUE BETNEEN HOMESTEAD SAVINGS AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ~ REC01/EMDATION it is recamnended that City Council adopt the attached Resoiution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication between Homestead Savings and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROIIID/ANALYSIS The attached subJect Agreement between the City and Homestead Savings provides for intersection and traffic signal improvements which include street widening and traffic signal installation and otM1er related work, along the northeast corner portion of tfie Homestead Savings parcel. Homestead Savings has agreed to grant to the City a Road Easement to allow fer the intersection construction and installation of the traffic signal improvements at the Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue intersection. Said traffic signal and street widening improvements will be constructed in con,Tunctlon with the City's Highland Avenue at Rochester Avenue, Intersection and Traffic Signal Protects. Respectfully submJ.tted, Hm. Joe O'Neil 1 \~C/ City Engineer NJO;HMay Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 91- 3 ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALiFDRNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-MAY FROM HOMESTEAD SAVINGS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WIiEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has established requirements for construction of road improvements in contunction with the Highland Avenue at Rochester Avenue Intersection and Traffic Signal Protects; and NHEREAS, the installation of a traffic signal and other related work, located along the northeast corner portion of the Homestead parcel, shall be made a part of the Highland Avenue at Rochester Avenue Intersection and Traffic Signal Protects; and NHEREAS, Homestead Savings has agreed to dedicate road easement to the City for said improvements. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. I~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 ~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ' Jack Lam, AICP, f,T ty Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RICHARD CLEMENTS, FOR AN ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY PESIOENCE, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BUENA YISTA, NORTH OF CAMINO SUR RECOMEMUATIIIN It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subiect Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing the same to record. The developer, Rfchard Clements, of 7717 Buena Ytsta, north of Camino Sur, requested a building permit for an addition t0 a single family residence. Street improvements are a condition of issuing the building permit. The City does not require said improvement to be built at this time. Therefore, the developers have submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the construction of the tmprovements on Buena Vista. A copy of the Agreement is available to the City Clerk's office. Respectfully sub~mi~tt~ed~, Nm. Joe O'Neil (/ ~~ City Engineer MJO:SM:d1 rr Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 9/" 3 3 0 A RESOLUTION-OF THE CItt COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROYEMENT CONTRACT ANO LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RICHARD CLEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR ANO CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAFE WHEREAS, the City Council of the Cify of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public Improvements in conjunction with building perniit issuance; and NHEREAS, installation of curb, established as prerequislie to issuance Ytsta has been met by entry into a Real Agreement by Richard Clements. gutter, sidewalk and pavement of building permit far 7717 Buena Property Improvement Contract and Lien NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES to accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes Ue Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the Ctty Clerk to record same 1n the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardfno County, California. al 7717 6UFT]A CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~G~~RDYG DIVISION ~• SITE MAP ayly~~; 7717 B[IENA VISTA i Z Z ~HIDIT:_-- A---_-_ ____ Noverber 6, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Aec4lar Meet inc A. CALL TO ORDBR A Yegular meeting of the Rancho Cdcemon9a Redevelopoent Agency was held on Wednesday, November 6, 1991, in [he C@uncil Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Ctvis center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornte. The meeting was called [o ortler at 7:06 p.m. by Vice Cbairman William J. ALexander. Present were Agencymembers: Charles J. Bu gust II, Diane Williams, Pamela J. Hright, and Vice Chairman William J, Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lamr Executive Director; James Marlonen, Legal C9unsel) Linda D. Danieie, Deputy DirecCOr; Jerry e. Fu~wood; Deputy City Manager; Tarry Smith, Park Planning/Development Superintendent; Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Foncfj- lenior Planner; Alan Warren, AsaocLate Planner; Aichard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Paul Rougeaur TrafFic Engineer; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Mike Olivier, Sz. Civil Engineer; Joe Schultz, Community Services Director; Susan Neely, Finance Officer; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Aancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Lt. Joe Henry, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, Aaaiatant Secretary. Absent wee: Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Agencymember Buquet added that Chairman Stout was out of town on bueineea for the City. • • . • . • 0. CO(OIUNIC-TIONS FRGN TBE PUBLIC , No communications were made. k • k fi x C~NBBNT~AA C1. AppE•oval of Mtnutee: October 16, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 yn-y T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council v Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF THE RENENAL AGREEMENT FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSlENT DISTRICTS 1 ANO 5 TO LANDSCAPE NEST OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE AMOUNT OF 5181,452.00, TO BE FUNDED BY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSI~£NT O[STRICTS 1 AND 5, ACCOUNT NUMBERS 40-4130-6028 AND 44-4130-6028, RESPECTIVELY. It is recontaended that the City Council approve and execute the renewal agreement with Landscape Nest of Anaheim, California, for the Landscape and Irrigatfon Contract for Landscape Maintenance Otstricts 1 and 5. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The present contract was executed on July 26, 1989, and is renewable for three years on a year to year basis. Thts 1s the third year of the three year contract. The contract has been amended in accordance with the original agreement. This year the contract amount is 5181,452.00 which refl ect current costs. Respectfully submitted, ~~1~~ Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:LEH:~h CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: November 20, 1991 ^ To: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~l,Jt Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assocla to Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF THE RENENAL AGREEMENT FOR THE LANDSCAPE ANO IRRIGATION CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 2 AND 4 TO LANDSCAPE NEST OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE AMOUNT Of 5685,900.00, TO BE FUNDED BY LANDSCAPE 144INTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 2 ANO 4, ACCOUNT NUMBERS 41-4130-6028 AND 43-4130-6028, RESPECTIVELY. RECOMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and execute the renewal agreement with Landscape Nest of Anahetm, California, for the Landscape and Irrigation Contract for Landscape Maintenance Distrtcts 2 and 4. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The present contract was, executed on July 26, 1989, and is renewable for three years on a year to year basis. This 1s the third year of the three year contract. The contract has been amended in accordance wtth the original agreement. This year the contract amount is 5685,900.00, which reFl ect current costs. Respectfully submitted, `~. ~C (~ ~ ! L- Wm. Joe O'Neil /~ City Engineer ~/ WJO:LEH:jh CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND EKECUTION OF THE RENEWAL AGREEMENT FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION CONTRACT FOR GENERAL FUND AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 3A AND 3B TO MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES OF IRWINOALE, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE AMOUNT OF (258,910.00, TO BE FUNDED BY THE GENERAL FUND AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 3A AND 3B, ACCOUNT NUMBERS O1-4647-6028, 42-4130- 6028 AND 46-4130-6028, RESPECTIVELY. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and execute the renewal agreement with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc. of Irwindale for the Landscape and Irrigation Contract for the Geneal Fund and Landscape Maintenance Districts 3A and 38. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The present contract was executed on July 26, 1989, and is renewable for three years on a year to year basis. This is the third year of the three year contract. The contract has Deen amended in accordance with the original agreement. This year the contract amount 1s f258,970.00, which refl ect current costs. Respectfully submltteQ,~ ~~ (~ Le ~( Wm. Joe O'Neil L City Engineer WJO:LEH:jh CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BV: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND EJ(ECUTION OF THE RENEWAL AGREEMENT FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 6 TO LANDSCAPE WEST OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE AMOUNT OF (161,000.00, TO BE FUNDED BY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 6, ACCOUNT NUMBER 45-4130-6028. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and execute the renewal agreement with Landscape West of Anaheim, California, for the Landscape and Irrigation Contract for Landscape Maintenance District 6. BACKDRDUND/ANALYSIS The present contract was executed on July 26, 1989, and is renewable for three years on a year to year basis. Th15 is the third year of the three year contract. The contract has been amended in accordance with the original agreement. This year the contract amount is 5161,000.00 which refl ect current costs. Respectfully submiited, Mm. Joe O'Neil ~'~ ~~~ City Engineer WJO:LEH:,~h a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ''` Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Ne11, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer SUBJECT; APPROVAL ANO E%ECUTION OF THE RENEWAL AGREEMENT FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION CONTRACT FOR THE HAVEN MEDIAN ISLANDS AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ACCESS ROAD AREAS TO MARIPOSA NORTICULTURAL ENTERDRISES OF I161INDALE, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE AMOUNT OF 5206,960.00, TO BE FUNDED BY GENERAL FUND, COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 1, 2 AND 4, ACCOUNT NUMBERS 01-4647- 6028, OS-4647-6028, 4D-4130-6028, 41-4130-6028 AND 43-4130- 6028, RESPECTIVELY. IL is recommended that the City Council approve and execute the renewal agreement with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc. of Irwindale for the landscape and Irrigation Contract for Haven Median Islands and the San Bernardino County Flood Control Access Road Areas. The present contract was executed on July 26, 1989, and is renewable for three years on a year to year basis. This is the third year of the three year contract. The contract has been amended in accordance with the original agreement. This year the contract amount 1s 5206,960.00. Respectfully submcitt/ed, ~ /~ Wm. Joe O'Neil V City Engineer NJO;LEH:,jh CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, C1ty Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Wi111e Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT aF RECORDATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT MAP 13351, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND TERRA VISTA PARKNAY, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COIPANY RECOMMENDATION It 1s recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 13351, accepting the Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Agreement for Postponement of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 and authorizing the Ndyor and the City Clerk to sign Bald agreement and to cause said map and agreements to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13351, located at the southwest corner of M1111ken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, in the Medium Density Residential District of the Terra Y1sta Planned Community, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 12, 1989. A modification to the tract was approved by the Planning Commission on August 28, 1991 to increase the number of mul tl -family lots from one lettered and five numbered to one lettered and seven numbered lots for 118 condlmintums an 11.2 acres. The Developer, Lew1s Development Company, is submitting an Improvement agreement and securities to guarantee the installation of median landscaping on Terra Vista Parkway in the following amoents: Faithful Performance Bond: f51,600.00 Labor and Material Bond: f25,800.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 13351 - LEW IS DEV CO November 20, 1991 Page 2 The Developer, is also submitting an Agreement tc postpone the recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions because review of the CCBR's by the California Department of Real Estate will most likely result in changes to said CC6R's and cannot be accomplished prior to the requested date for recordation of the final tract map. Prior to City approval of occupancy releases, the Developer 1s required to submit the proposed CCdR's with certification of approval by the Department of Real Estate and said CCdR's must be approved by the City and recorded. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Mater District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file Tn the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ~C~Ze~ Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer MJO:NV:dlw Attachment aq RESOLUTION N0. G~I- j3~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 13351 NHE REAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13351, consisting of 8 lots. submitted by Lewis Development Compagy, Subdivider, located on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Yista Parkway has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdlvlder and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the F1na1 Map of said Tract, said Subdlvlder has offered the Improvement Agreement together with good and sufficient Improvement Securities, and submits for approval said F1na1 Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon NON, THEREFORE, THE CItt COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HEREOY RESOLVE as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Securities is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the C!ty Attorney; and That the offers for dedication and the F1na1 Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk 1s authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said Cf ty. 30 RESOLUTION N0. 91- -j ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AGREEMENT MITH LEN IS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT N0. 13351 MHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13351, submitted by Lewis Development Company, Subdivider, located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista ParkwAy in the Terra Vista Planned Community, was conditionally approved to prepare Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCAR'S) in compliance with standards established by the Ctty; and MHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequ151te to approval of bull ding permits for the proposed development, said subdivider has entered into an agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by Bald City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: NOM, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the Ct;y Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: That Bald Agreement be and the same are approved and the M1Ayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk 15 authorized to attest thereto and cause same to be recorded upon said execution. 31 RESOLUTION N0. (~/, ~2 ~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE LITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNERATION Of CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 4 FOR TRACT N0. 13351 NHEREAS, the City Councll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance dl strict Dursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance 0lstrict No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street lighting Maintenance District Na. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NNEAEAS, at this time the Ctty Councll is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated hereto by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, ali of the owners of property within the territory proposed to 6e annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE LITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY aF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this tegislatlve bogy hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown 1n Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described 1n Exhtblt "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance 015tr1ct. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including a evy of all assessments, sha11 be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 3 Z E%HIBIT .A. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 1 1 ~~~" d~~ ^~ 1~~1«7C 1~J0~ ~ V ~ J ~i 9 i ~,, ~. .J j m ~~~ . -~~'~\ -1 uFn~AN W+OSCAA'e 'VCEA fiJ.19 S.F. essaslleer oleco-e ceeoscers NeYereeeeca olsrQlcr eo. ~ TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ( TRACT NO. 13351 ) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r TR /335/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~.~ EIIHIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: TRACT 13351 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 11.2 ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 118 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lan s to be Annexed District No. ~_ _~_ 1 --' --' --- __' --- q ___ ___ ___ __- _-- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Caamunity Turf Dlstrtct No. Street Nave Eauest.Tratl Sa. ft. 4 Terra Vista --- --- Parkwary Median Island --- --- M111Tken Ave. --- --- Belplne P1. --- --- Ground Cover Se. ft. Trees Ea. --- 23 6,219 11 --- 18 '-' g NV:11/20/91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Assoc late Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MM, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF RECORDATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, AND ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT N0. 13717, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SPRUCE AVENUE AND ELM AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LEN IS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 13717, accepting the subiect agreements and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said map to record. ANU.rsts/BAC%sRDUwo Tract 13717, located on the southeast corner of Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue 1n the Terra Vista Planned Community, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 14, 1990, for the division of 23.5 acres into 16 numbered and 4 lettered lots. The Developer, Lewis Development Company, is suhmitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements Tn the following amounts: Street nest Greemway Church St. Improvements Trail Median Faithful Performance Bond: 582,000 5137,000 Labor and Material Band: Monumentation: (41,000 f 68,500 f 3,400 (Cash Deposit) 564,000 532,000 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT N0. 13717 - LENIS DEV CO November 20, 1991 Page 2 In addition, the Developer is requesttng a postponement of Recordation of Convenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC6R's) to allow the California Department of Real Estate (DRE) sufficient time for reviewing prior to float recordation. Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Naiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, /~ ~, /1 / ~ Nm. Joe O'Neil J City Engineer MJO;JS: diw Attachments 3 ~O RESOLUTION N0. 9J' A RESOLUTIOW OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 13717, IMPROVEaENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13717, submitted by Lewis Development Company. and consisting of 16 numbered and 4 lettered lots located on the southeast corner of Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on February 14, 1990, and is to compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 13717 15 Ue final map of the division of land aDProved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry Into an improvement Agreement guaranteed Dy acceptable improvement Security by Lewis Development Company as developer; and NHEREAS, said Developer submits for approvai said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby auUOrized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the C11y Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 13717 1s hereby approved and the City Engineer 15 authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. 3~ RESOLUTION N0. 9/ A RESOLUTION t)F THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT KITH LENS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT N0. 13717 NHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13717, consisting of twenty (20) lots submitted by the Lewis Development Company, Subdivider, located in the Terra Vista Planned Community was cond/tionally approved to prepare Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCdR's) in compliance with standards established by the City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirements as a prerequisite to approval of building permits for the proposed development, said subdivider has entered Into an agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE LITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA HEIU:BY RESOLVES, as follows: i. That said agreement be and the same 15 approve and the MAyor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Cierk 1s authorized to attest thereto and cause same to be recorded upon said execution. 3$ RESOLUTION N0. LI f _ 3Lf A RESOLUTION dF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT N0. 13117 MHEAEAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously fonaed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter Z of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, at this time the City Council 1s desirous to take proceedings t0 annex the Droperty described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proDOSed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have flied with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS fOLLONS: SECTION I: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown 1n ExhiDlt "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including ~ieTevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 3~ .~ a H ~i a E W W a E W 3 _. a ~, N ~ N ~ N N N ~ M = 01 f N w a m ~` a ~o ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 4 ~ Lf' V o ~ ~ s 9 N N N t ';' N 4 N b 0 ~; M B N N '~*«.y~ G%HI6[i "A" 1 U~ 3 r 3 ., t> O Z P17 00 y N 0 s m Q bd ~- b H A Y 7 n m ~~ ~ ~~ ly Vl 'x ~ D=O m f~'! "'~ ~ °O v y o .., ~ .~ :+. ~ ~~ r i ... y 0 %HIBIT "A" 2 OF 3 essass~RRr oiecreR ceeosceeR Re-RrRReRCR oisrRicr Ro. ~ ~ ~ TR. NO. 13717 r ~ \ /,' ~,,,% F' ~/ f~ I' ~I Raw evRRRR SrROCB eY8R08 CBURCR 8rR86r ST. LIOHT(16000 LUM.) -- 1 G __ ST. LIONT(9300 LUM.) -- 6 G. ] G. ST. LICHT(SR00 EOM.) 12 G. ,~,_ 5T. TR6L3(15 OAL.) 7] G. 50 G . IB Lq, PARRNAY LARDSCAPING 17,]00 S F , . 9, X00 S. F. ],570 S. F. ROTE ALL WANTITI63 SHONN ARL ONLY FOR TRL PARRNAYS ADJACENT TO TRACT NO. 1]717. E%HIBIT "A" 3 OF 3 EXNIDIT 'B• PROJECT NAME: TRACT N0. 13171 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 394 d.u. N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 197 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lam s to be Annexed District No. y ~_ 1 --- 6 1 --- --- 4 12 --- ___ ___ .-- LANDSCAPE WIINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover District No. Street Nave Sa. ft. Se. ft. 4 Church St. --- 15,070 (Median island) Nest GreenwAy Hardscape 4,380 9,120 Elm Avenue --- 17,300 Spruce Avenue --- 9,400 Church Street --- 3,570 JS/11-20-91 Trees 5-Gal. Ea. Shrubs --- 469 ea --- 73 --- 50 --- 18 ~l3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Ctty Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROYEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT N0. 14192-1, LOCATED SOUTH OF 19TH STREET DEIWEEN HELLMAN AND A~£THYST AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY HI% DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AECOMENDATION it 7s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 14192-1, accepting the subJect agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSISBACKGRDUND Tract 14192, located south of 19th Street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues in the Low Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission on June 27, 1990 for the division of 19.7 acres Into 65 lots. Tract 14192-1 is phase one of two and 1s for the division of 7.6 acres Into 26 lots being a portion of said Tract No. 14192. The Developer, HTx Development Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements of Phase One to the following amounts: Street Storm Drain Landscape Protect Phase One Improvements Improvements Improvements Totals Faithful Performance E 759,000 f 427,000 f 69,000 f1,255,000 Labor and Material f 379,500 f 213,500 S 34,500 S 627,500 Monumentatlon (cash) --- --- --- E 3,700 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 14192-1 - HIX DEV CORD November 20, 1991 Page 2 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Nater District. The Consent and WaTVer to Annexation form signed by the Deveioper is on file Tn the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, .~~e ~lJ'Ze Wm. Joe O'Neil (~~ City Engineer NJO:PY:dlw Attachments 45 "ECT _~ ~' (SIRC HOUR 30 1 :54AC .ORO DRIVE II ~ ~i a a a ~ ~. ~ j w w 4 a s ~ n ¢i a j i ,v ~' v u '~ - II w j u t' ' _ n n u _'~ I -1 ~~ f - '~ ~ i 141~eNe,rE sT I ~i ~i i 'i LOCATION MAP ~~ S~IJNTG JI ST.1 ~~'R!!~ N T'~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITElilk '~'nF: Rk^ =" ENGNVEERING DIVISION TITLE: 7r~A~r I ~r i 9 Z ' ! EXFNBIT: Z 4 In VICINITY MAP .e .~... RESOLUTION N0. 9/. 3 ~ 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14192-1, IWROVEPENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY NHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 14192, submitted by Hix Development Corporation, and consisting of 65 lots located south of 19th Street between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue, was approved by the Planning Camnlssian of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, on June 27, 1990 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and NHE REAS, Tract Map No. 14192-1 1s the map of Phase i of 2 phases of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map, and consisting of 26 lots of the 65 lots shown on Bald Tentative Tract Map; and NHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of said tract map by the Ctty Council of said City have now been met by entry into an improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Nix Development Corporation as developer; and NHEAEAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by Bald developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14192-1 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be flied for record. 4~ RESOLUTION N0. 9i' 3`f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE tMINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 ANO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT N0. 10.192-1 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the Droperty described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF MNCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "8" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including tTie T of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 46 A ASSESSMENT DIA~aRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~.r LEGEND ® CITY MhINTAINED AREA CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r- ? STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~N iai,~-, ERHIBII "~ EXHIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: TRACT N0. 14192-1 N0. OF O.U. OR ACREAGE: 21 d.u. N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 21 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of lam s to be Annexed 0l strict No. _i_ s_ 1 20 --' --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Conmunity District No. Street Name Eguest.Tratl 1 Hellman Ave. --- Issac Lord Dr. --- Gilbert P1. --- Mignonette St. --- Turf Ground Cover Trees Sg• ft. Sg. ft. Ea. --- 7,270 45 --- --- 16 --- --- 20 --- --- 14 PV:11/20/91 So ----- CITY OF RANCHO C1;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector I~~~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 12659-1 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF ETINANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET SUBMITTED 8Y ETINANDA ESTATES RECOMMEMOATIOM It is recamnended that the City Council adopt the attached resoiution, accepting the sublect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACK910UIq/ASW.TSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public Improvements for Tract 12659-1 were approved by the City Council on October 6, 1988, in the following amounts: Streets Storm Grain Faithful Performance Bond: 5600,000 5132,000 Labor and Material Bond: S300,000 f 66,000 The developer, Etiwanda Estates, 1s requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said Improvement agreement 1n order to complete the Equestrian Tra11 and cap paving of the streets. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully su ted, G~/~-~' Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer i1J0; SMG: Iy Attachments 1297 KORTH TOWNE r\V E. PO\t0\A,CALIFOR\1A 91751 Telephone (711) G3-6555 • PAX (774)6?3-1'J'_ October 31, 1991 Mr. Steve M. Gilliland Community Development Department THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-0807 Re: Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 12659-1 Dear Mr. Gilliland: As I discussed with you on the phone, your letter was directed to The Walton Associated Company of whom we discharged in October 1990 and was late being forwarded to Etiwanda Estates. We are requesting an extension of the Improvement Agreement so that we might finish the remaining work to be done. It is my understanding that we still have some work to do on a bridle trail between Lots 1 and 2, the finished surface of the interior streets for Phase I as well as the hydroseeding of the equestrian facilities. The equestrian facilities will be done in the next few weeks. We had held off on the surfacing of the interior streets in hopes our lender would extend the funds for the installation of the sewer mains in Phase Z. However, since they have been taken over by the government, they are refusing to do so. This work should be completed within six months of today's date. The main reason foz our delay is that we had to replace our Contractor to finish the houses and with the government taking over our lender, Great American Savings Bank in San Diego, they have been holding up funds for our completion. Hopefully this is sufficient information for you to grant us an extension. Respectfully, ~.c~y- ~,~-70`~ Wayxe D. Blanton Managing Partner - Etiwanda Estates WDB/jlb Sot f®. RESOLUTION N0. ~/_ ~[~-~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12659-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November 20, 1991, by Etiwanda Estates as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,~acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 29th Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subJect to the terms thereof, is to be done in confunction with the development of said Tract 12659-1; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified 1n said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk t0 attest thereto. S3 ------ CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAHONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Pu611c Norks Inspector I ~• i SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 11341 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LENIS HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Parcel Map 11341 Mere approved by the City Council on October 20, 1988, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: ;592,000. Labor and Material Band: ;296,000. The developer, Lewis Homes, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement. Nhile all Improvements are complete, the extension is necessary for the landscape to complete the estabilshment period. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the CTty Clerk's Office. Respec ly submitted, / ~' `'( 4kn. J Ne11 City sneer NJO:SMG:Iy Attachments Lewis Homes Management Corp. I I56 NmN Mrnmum Avrnye / P.O. Eox 670 / Uplxnd, Glifomix 91785-5008 714y85~097i FAX: 714,9496700 /~, October 9, 1991 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P. O. Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 a1 Attn: Steve Gilliland ~'~~ Engineering Division Dear Steve: Enclosed please find our Improvement Agreement Extension Por Parcel Map 11341. We request a 180 day extension to accommodate the landscape Maintenance period as established by City policy. our check number 085269 for 5251.00 is enclosed to cover this extension. Thank you. Sincerely yours, EEWIS OME T CORP. J/~ ~. Jose M eson Vice President Senior Project Manager JMO:ksk Enclosures .SS RESOLUTION N0. ~/_ J2 ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROYEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11341 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November 20, 1991, by Lewis Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adfatent to the reai property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Parcel MaD 11341; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucanxrnga, Ca',ifornfa hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. Sao - CITY OF RANCHO CI;CAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 20, 1991 Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, A1CP, City Manager ,~,: ~f Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gtililand, Pub17c Norks Inspector II- APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 21940, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WHITE OAK AVENUE AND ELM AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY SAHAM0. DEVELOPMENT It Ts recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Parcel Map 11940 were approved by the City Council on November 8, 1990, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f32,200 Labor and Material Bond: f16,100 The .developer, Sahama Development, 1s requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. The extension is necessary because the pro,~ect has been in the design review process, and permits have not yet been issued. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respectful) ubmitted, ~~ VAa. Joe 0' e1 City Engine r NJO:SMG:sd Attachments SAHAMA Development Company, Inc. P.O. Box 2906 Rancho Cucamonga. California 91729.2906 (714) 987-8141 Facsimile (714) 941-8879 October 29, 1991 Mr. Steve Gilliland, Public Works Inspector CITY OF RANCHO COCANONOA Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Ilpr2v_aIDant Acre_aeeat for Parcel MaD 1194 Dear Steve: Please allow this to serve as a formal request for a twelve month extension with respect to the Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 11940. Please be advised that this project Ras been assigned and re- assigned to three different planners in the course of one year, which in itself, has delayed us substantially. Also, one of the buildings made an unscheduled trip back through Design Review Committee process and we have yet to be in a position to pull approved building permits. Once obtained, Construction will commence shortly thereafter and our objective is to complete the project in a professional, but timely, manner. Enclosed herewith is the extension fee amount and the fully executed Improvement Agreement Extension. Your positive response to this request would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, SAHAMA DEVEIRPMENT COMPANY, INC., a califoraia Corporation J Rick J. CYawley, Executive Vice Pr ent R.7C/dm Enclosure SO RESOLUTION N0. g/.3~.q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11940 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November 20, 1991, by Sahama Development as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,j scent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located an the southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Elm Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subj ect to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of Bald Parcel Map 11940; and 41HEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. S°~ --CITY OF RANCHO CCCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Pub11t Norks Inspector II SU&IECT: RELEASE OF BONDS FOR PARCEL MAP 11030 - FOOTHILL MEDIANS ; It Ts recommended that City Council authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond for the Foothill Boulevard Medians associated with Parcel Map 11030 located on Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue. BACK6ROUIN/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 11030 is located on the north east corner of Footh711 Boulevard and Haven Avenue and is being developed by Lewis Homes. The Improvement Agreement for the Foothill Medians, the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f105,749, and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of 552,874 were accepted by Council on March 2, 1989. On August 8, 1991, City Council accepted another Improvement Agreement and bonds for the same Foothill Medians under CUP 88-12. The Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond are in the amounts of 5362,000 and f181,000 respectively. Since CUP 88-12 has securities that cover the Foothill Median Improvements, it 7s being recommended that Council authorize the release of the Foothill Median securities associated with Parcel Map 11030. Release: Faithful Performance Bond f105,149.00 Labor and Materials Bond f 52,874.00 Developer: Lewis Homes 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Respectfully 5ublrt`fE~,t~Ce-d~~ 'n Nm. Joe O'Neil `/ J~ C, Y// City Engineer v NJO:SMG: 1y Attachments ---- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAyIONGA STAFF REPORT ,.,...~ DATE: T0: FROM: 8Y: SUBJECT: November 20, 1991 :.'r Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Ctty Manager Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 10349 LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET AT THOROUGHBRED STREET. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS the required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects 1n materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Naltan Development 2011 E. Financial Nay Glendora, CA 91740 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 532,600. Respectfully su ted, /~ Ihn. Joe O'Neil l City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy - --- CCTV OF RANCHO CtiCA~tONGA _ STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council ~f Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: kfi. Joe O'Neii, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: RELEASE OF M4INTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 13715 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF JENNETTE STREET AND EXETER COURT I RECOMIENDATION It is recommended Lhat the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free frgn defects 1n materials and vrorkmanshlp. DEVELOPER: Nalton Development 2011 E. Financial Nay Glendora, CA 91740 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Rond (Street) (4,400.00 and 51,900.00 Respectfully sub ted, IAn. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy ORDINANCE NO. 460 AN ORDIIJANCE OF 74~ CPiY COIAiCII, OF 7NE CLTY OF RANCHO Ct7CAppNC.7i, CALIFORNIA, ADDFR9dG, BY REF'FItENCE, OIIIIINANCE NO. 3349 OF '1NE COIINIY OF SAN BtRNARDINO pESR'AINING ~10 TilE', ESII~~9I.I5341ENP OF RULFS, RLGULATYONS AND P[K7CIDURFS fDR PAKPZCiP ' IN 74~ VFIIICLE ABATII+IFNP AND RII~XNAL PROGRAM OF Ti1E; OJUNrY OF SAN BIIiTWRDINO, IN/7l.JDING 'itR; f5PAB7St~II+II~N'f OF CFSQAIN FF~5 AND PFNAL'I2E5 A. Recitals. (i) 4he City of Rancho Cucanaiya has entered into an acgeerrent with the County of San Bernrxiliro to participate in the County's vehicle abataoant program regarding abandoned, dismantled, inoperative, junked and wrecked vehicles within the City of Rancho cucaacnga. Pursuant to the requir'~ertts of that agreainnt, the City is required to adapt, by reference, Ordinance No. 3349 of the county of San Bernardino pertaini~ to the rules and regulations establishimq the Camty Vehicle Abatement. and Remval Program. (ii) Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Pazt 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Goverrmient Code (Sections 50020, et seq.}, authorizes the adoption, ~ reference, of certain state atd local ordinances, imludinl the ~tY of San Bexrrardino Vehicle Abatement and Reiroval Program as adgrted by Ordinance No. 3349 of the Hoard of Supervisors of the CauRy of San Bernardino. (iii) At least one (iy SPY of said Oniinarx:e certified as a full, true and correct ~1Y thereof lry the City Clerk of the City of Rancho CuCannrK,Ja, has been filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with the provisions oP California Ga'rerrmrent Code Section 50022.6. (iv) Pricr to the adoption of this ordinance, this City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing, as required by California GovernmPSit Cale Section 50022.3. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Ordinance have axurred. 8. Ordi~a*+ca. NOW, Ti~RII'URE, :he City Council of the City of Fanrho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follcxas: SECPION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. StX.TtON 2: 'the City Coucil of the City of Rancho Cucamarga hereby adopts the provisions of the San eettiardino County ~^]ehicle Abatement aM Removal Program" as adopted by Ordinance No. 3349 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bl'1Tardino. ~~i Ordirrarrya No. 460 Page 2 SECi2Cd~t 3: The City Council declares that should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence ar words of this Ordir~ice be rendered ar declared invalid by arty final mtrt action in a cast of ocapeteJ~t jurisdiction, ar by reason of any prcea~tive legislation, the remainirx3 provisions, sectiore, paragraphs, sentences, and vords of this oiclinance shall remain in full force and effect. ' SE7CPZ~1 4: Tire City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Oitiirmnce and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the inlan3 Valley Daily Bu11etvr, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated In the City of Far~cilo Cuc~ga, California. wi~ ORDINANCE NO. 464 AN ORDII~NCE OF THE CTM ~[MCIL OF THE CT1'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFCgWIA, APPROVING DEVE[APMENf CODE AMFNR4FNf 91-03, ADDING A NF30 SUBSIKTION 17.08.040-P AND A NFN SUB.SECI'SON 17.06.070-E TU THE RANQ~30 CUCAMkK~A.A MUNICIPAL (ADE PE[a'AINING TU PROPERLY NAlldl'II~@NCE STANDARDB AND ONGOING MAINPII4ANCE REQUIRII+IFNTS FOR MULTIPLE FAMII.Y OWFdd.INGS, AND FII+IOSIG FII4DINGS IN SUPRIIZf THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) On July 10, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Randto Cucamonga mn3ucted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the follow- ing proposed amerrlment to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Munucipal Code (hereinafter referred to as the '~Developnent Code') regarrlirg regulati~s for property maintenance standazrls for multiple family dwellings within residential disc icts of the City. (ii) At the wr~clusion of said public hearing on July 10, 1991, the Planning Commission adoptsl its Resolution No. 91-100 thereby recamierding that this Council adopt the proposed Development Code a~ments as set forth in this orrlinance. (iii) On November 6, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rarxfio cucanrotga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the proposed Development Code anierdnwnts as set forth herein and said heating was concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, (iv) All legal preraguisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have oavrx~ed. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Ncamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Pact A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECI`IgY 2: Silsection 17.08.040-P is hereby adds3 to the Development Cade of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to read, in words and figures, as follows: P. gropertv Maintenwnce. Property owners are responsible for the continuous maintenance of all buildings, structures, yards, lardscap- irg, signs, lurking areas, recreational facilities and other i~tove- ments in a manner which does not detract from the appearance of the surrouruiing area. In addition, Multiple Family Residential Develop- ments subject to the Development/Design Review process shall maintain site improv~ients in cniq~liance with all applicable conditions of approval im¢~osed by the Planning Cafunission. 5 Ordinance t7o. 464 Page 2 SECTION 3: sUbsecti~ 17.08.070-E is hereby added to the Developient Cade of the city of Nancho Clicamon9a to read, in xrn'rts aTd figures, as follows: E. Multiple Family Dwellino Maintenance. 'The followitg maintenance requireme„tc shall be applicable to all Multiple Family Frsidential Developments in addition to other general maintenance provisions of this Ctde. 1. Buildirys aTd structirz~es: a. Shall rpt be permitted W deteriorate, or remain in an unrepaired or dilapidated oordition; b. 6uildirg exteriors stall be maintained, painted or treated to provide for we<.tt~ protection; c. Damage to structures shall be repaired within 30 days from the date of occtiurence; d. Doors, fences, gates, and similar structures shall be kept in proper operating cotdition, including their loc3:itq and latc3ting devices. 2. Lvdscaping, trees, shrubs, graadwver, arci irrigation systems: a. Tar+~tscaped areas stall be kit free fran weed., axd debris afx3 maintained in a twalthy thrivirg wndition; b. All plant materials shall receive regular maintenanoe, including but not limited to, fertiliziTg, mowing, aTrl trillORingi c. My dauaged, dead, diseased, or decayitg plant materials stall lie replace3 within 30 days frun the date of damage; d. Irrigation systems shall be kept in proper working order to provide proper amwnts of water and proper coverage; and e. Iarclscape screening materials, such as hedges, shall be pruned to maintain their screening ability. 3. Parking areas, walkways and open space: a. 9x11 be kept clean and free of debris atd items of storage; b. Paved surfaces shall be maintained free of potholes, broken or raised sections, and other deterioration; c. Outside lic~tirg fixtures shall he kept in proper working order; inoperative lights shall be repaired or replaoad within 30 days of damage or failure; ~~ Ordinance No. 464 Page 3 4. Trash enclosures and refuse ~tainets: a. Shall be kept clean and the vicinity kept free of debris and gates/doors shall be maintained in proper working order; b. AoomAati~ of refuse shall not be permittsl to e:rceed the capacity of the refuse cw~tainers; 5. Graffiti shall to removed within 72 hours. 6. Re¢eational facilities, mmnn use areas, amenities, aryl other site inprovements shall be maintained in a usable coldition free frvn deterioration; 7. Lighting shall 1>e maintained in a usable corclition free fnm deterioration; 8. Conditions of Approval for a project, inposed in wr~junetion with the Developmnt/Design Review process which set forth requirenents for the developmnt of the site, shall also be subject to ongoing mair~tE'-~noe reyuiramnts. SACITON 4: this Council finds that this amerd,mnt will not adversely affect the envirmmwm and hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SFX.'fION 5: 'ihe City Camcil declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or wont of this Ordinance be rendered or declared irnalid bn+ any final coat action in a mia-t of oD~etEnt jurisdiction, or b~+ reason of any preenQtive legislation, the remaining provisiorc;, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and wends of this ondinarn,~e shall rain in full force and effect. SEYTION 6: 'the Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the city clerk shall cause the same to be publish within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bu~letin, a newspaper of gsneral circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 465 AN OI7DII4ANCE OF THE CTTY NNNCII OF 'ffiE CPly OF RANQfO CUCAbDNGP., CALIFCHSIIA, APHSNiNG DEVIIDPMENI' ODDE AMFND- MENT 91-02, AMElIDING TTTLE 17 OF R}~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL NDE, FFT.,Aid)ING VARIOUS DEVE[DPMFNl' SPF+tIINILJ6 AND DESIQI GlJIDEL1NES FLH2 MULTI-FAMII,Y RESIDEN17Ai. DISIRICIS, AND MAI@iG FINDINCv IN SUPFORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) On April 24 and oontinue9 to May 8, June 12, July 10, and August 14, August 22, and Septanber 11, 1991, the PlannurJ cYmnission of the City of Rancho Cucamorcla wrciucted duly ratioed public hearings with respect to the above-referenced Development Owe Artr~rent. FollWing the ow~clusion of said public hearing ~ September 11, 1991, the Plannirg CVmmiissi~ adopted Resolution No. 91-134, thereby rewmietdirg that the City Camcil adopt Developmnt Code Nnendnwnt No. 91-02. (ii) On Septa 11, 1991, the City Council of the City of Farc2w Cucamonga mrducted a duly noticed public hearing arc] concluder] said hearing prior to its adq~tion of this OiYliranoe. (iii) All legal prersiuisites prior to the adoption of this oitluance have amazed. B. Ordinance. NOW, THFI2EEORE, TY~e City Council of the city of Fanc3~o Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Tttis Council herplry specifies and firds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordir~anee are true and correct. SECPiON 2: This Cau~cil heirlry fircLs and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in crnplianc>' with the California Envirrn- mental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council herelry issues a Negative Declaration. SECTTON 3: The Rancho Cucatnotxla City Council finds as follows: a) The proposed Anerd,mnt would not have significant adverse impacts on the environment nor the surroundirg properties; and b) The prolxz,ed Ametd~mnt is in conformance with the Gernial Plan. Section 4; 'Ihe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga herelry approves Development Cade Amedment 91-02 as follows: a) Title 17 of the Fandio Cucamnrrla Municipal Code is hereby amended by mrxlifyirg Table 17.08.040H - Basic Development Standards, and Table 17.08.O40C - Optirnial Developmnt Stsvdards, attact:ed hereto as Ednibits "A" and "Bra and incorporated herein by thisQ reference. ~O Ordirrarrce No. 465 Page 2 b) Title 17 of the Rancho (]samonrga Municipal Code is hereby amaded by modifying Section 17.08.0406 - Recreation Area/ Facility, attadred hereto as Erdribit "C" aryl itrcxapacated herein by this reference. c) Title 17 of the Ralx3n Cl>camo[ga Mnicipal Nde is hereby amaded by modifying Section 17.08.040K - visitor Parlcvrg, atta<3red hereto as Erdribit "D" and inoorporatal herein by this reference. d) Title 17 of the Rarrdro Municipal Oxle is herelry amaded by adding a new SectiCxr 17.08.040E, and Table 17.08.040 (E) -Building Separations Starrlalds, attadred hereto as fldribit "E' and incorporated herein kry this reference, and all subsequent sections rentmdrered acwrdirgly. e) Title 17 of the Rarda Cucamonga Mrmi.cipal (krde is hereby amended by adding Section 17.08.040R - Amenities, attached hereto as Edribit "F" and inwrporatal herein by this r+efexerroe. f) Title 17 of the Random (xrcamorcp Mnicipal Code is hereby amended by modifying Section 17.08.050F1d(3) - Atsolute Policies, to x'ead as follows: An eirtire site plan shall he oriented so that the activities and functions are aligned hierardiically - placing those least ornpatible furthest from the ~nK.n bwadary betweetr lard uses and those most anQatible treat that baadary (i.e., single story adjacent to single stogy). g) Title 17 of the Parrdro Cucanprga Municipal Code is hereby anenrded bf modifying Section 17.08.090 - Design (~iidelirres, attached hereto as Edubit "G" and incorporated herein by ails reference. SECPICk1 5: The provisions of this oiditranoe shall not apply to those residential subdivisions wherein a Tentative Map and/or Design Review has beat approved prior to the effective date of this Ordirrarrre. 'lire approval shall include the time exterrtion as allowed by Section 17.02.100 of the Developrent code and as modified from time to time. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance arcl the city Clerk shall cause the sync to be published within fifteen (15) days after its ~~ at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, acrd circulated in the City of Rarx3ro (iramorrga, California. ~~ TABLE 17.08.010- B BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (Wfl=NOT REWIRED) VL L lM M MH LO AREA: 8000 0000 3AC 3AC 3AC MINIMUM NET AVERAGE (l) (L) (L) INIMUM NET 7200 5000 3AC 3AC 3AC ILI 0.) 0.1 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNRS (A) (PERMITTED PER ACRE) UP T02 UP TO• UP TOB UP T011 UP T019 UP T027 MINIMU WELLNIG UNR S¢E:( BINDLE FAMILY ATTACHED AND 1,000 SO.Ff. (H) REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT DETACHED DWELLING MULTI EFAMILY WELLIN (.R EFFICIENCVB7U010 550 SOFT. REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT ON DROOM 850 LE K: TWO DROOM 800 SO. IC LOT DIME MINIMUM WIDTH (®REOUIRED 9o AVG. 86 AVQ 50 AVG. WR WR WR FRONT SETBACK) VARY N 1o VARY N- 6 VARY H~ S MINIMUM CO R LOT WI 100 70 SO W MNI U 1 1 90 W MINI UM FRONTAGE 50 M 39 100 100 100 (!~ FRONT PROPERTY LINE) MINIMUM L 30 2 20 50 50 (® FRONT PROPERTY LINE) ACKS;1 ) FRONT YARD (D,E) t2 AVG. 37 AVG. 32 AVG. 37 AVG. N/R WR VARVd3 VARYN-5 VARVA3 VARY N-5 2 IN E 10 I VA 10115 S/10 &10 10 W W (D) R R YARD 30 0 15 1 W D AT IN 1 OUN A 30/6 2015 15/5 1515 15/5 155 (DWELLING UNR/ACCESSORY (D) (0) (D) BL00. EXHIBIT ~~ Ai ,~ TABLE 17.08.040 • B BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (Continued) (WR=NOT REQUIRED) VL L LM M MN H RESIDENTIAL BUILDING SEPARATIONS WR WR REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.Oe.0A0-E HEIGHT LIMRATION9 35 35 35 35 (Fl A0 (Fl 55 (Fl LOT COVERAGE (MA%IMUM %) 23% 40% 5096 50% 5096 50% OPEN SPACE REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE (GROUND flOORA1PPER STORY UNR) 2,000 / 1,000 / 300!150 22&150 1501100 150/100 COMMON OPEN SPACE (A) (MINIMUM%) WR WR WR 30% 3096 3096 USABLE OPEN SPACE (A) (PRIVATE AND COMMON) 65% 60% ~0% 35% 35% 35% RECREATION AREMFA lffT WR W REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.0!0-H LANDSCAPING (G) (G) (G) REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.010-G AMENRIES WR WR N/R REWIRED PER SECTION 17.09.010-R A E%CLWFAS LINDNEOE9BMrf-0R 9ECOIDMYSTIEEIe AM AN1FAWe AND N NNSDE ARE16 ENALLBE DE9ENOFNTa1 THE SLOP6GAPADffY FACiGR CCNfANED N BEGfpN I ).N.Otl- B . B A4 MEA.9WEDFROM TIE tETWTE CUIB FACE 011 P1AlC AMDPMATE SIIEETSREFER 70 TAEE11.OE010.0 iaR AOOITANAL eETBA0IL C. VARUBIE FRCNf VAR08ALLOEEO PURM1INf T09ECfpR tTAl0E0-N D. AOOTEN (10) FEET F ADIACEMf TO V4 LOR lM 0191RCi . E. LES9 TNAN ENiNIFEN ItR FEET FROM BACNOF eDEWAIX REaFEe AUfp1,IT10 GARAGE OOg10PENERe. F. lNR ONE(113TOM IYITIIN OIE NUORFOOOq FEET OF YIOR l OEiRCT FOR YULTRE fAMLV OY~FILFIOe. G. PEANETER LANOBCAPMi AND NIENOR SKEET 1RFEe. R. A SNNE FWIY DETACIFD ONH11N1lFAe TWW ONE TNOWUD I100R N}ANE fEEf WV EE AORpR~D YAFN A OEVEIOFMEM EJINEATe NNOVATNE OOMAFA N TRACT , NAT Alq ARCINTECTUVL OEBgN TMIOIIW TIE APPRwALOF A C01101TIONAL110E PFAYIf . I. SENIOR CR~NB PRGECfe ARE E%DifEO FROM TIl REOUFEI,ENf. J. TOAESUIE TWIT BMAMER OIIIe NIE NOT CONCENTMTFAN NIY OIE AIEA 011 PROIECf, 7NE F0101MIA PERCFNTAff INRATAN90F THE TOTAL MINBFAOF UINfe SHALL APPLY:7FN Ito! PMICENf fdl ERICENCVieTI01D AN0111NIYFNE rJel NTICENf GCR ONE BEd100M m IN TOTNNTY FNE f0R PDICBR COLEtEEO . euEECr TO ACAfaRIO1MLUeE PEWf . THE NAN119/0 COM11690N IMY ANIgROE A (YIFATER MTEf Q<FFFM:ENCYpINE 111 BFDROOY 1911T6IYIEN A OEVElOP1EMT FAN91T6 NNOVATNE OEeION WAUTES ANO A BHIIICE YMOi Il/llf 9O5DAND TYPES . N. WHLLNOE ARFM,NEANTee1WLeE LNffED 70TMIIY POI FE><TNePFSEEDNeECTI0N IT]1.010.0.1 . L ON fJ{L4TNOlOTEO'RECORD. PARCD31caA 11MN TIIRFE F-0ACREe OR LEee THAN 111E REOUIED MNMM gNINTAOE MAY ONLY BE DEVELOPED AT THE LOMEef END Oi THE PEPONRFD OENSR'/ RANGE . EXI-IIBIT p-~'~ TABLE 17.08.040 • C OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (WRa NOTR WIRED) L lA1 Y MH H (GROSS) SAC SAC SAC SAC 5AC V VA U1 (MINIMUM NET AVERAGE) REWIREb (p REQUIRED 5AC SAC (PERMITTED PER ACRE) UP TOI UP TOB UP TOI{ UP T02{ UP T030 I L U SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AND 1,000 SOFT. (O) REGARDLESS OF DISTRICT DETACHED DWELLING MUL F V D (K) EFFICIENCY/STUDIO WR 550 SOFT. RE611RDLESS OF DISTRICT ON DOOM 03 K: BEDR 000 SS ISTAIC TH OR MOR B OOM W 950 ISTRICT LO 0 MINIMUM WIDTH (® REQUIRED VARIATION (R VARIATION WR WR FRONT SETBACIq REQUIRED REQUIRED I I U I I W BINDLE FAMKV REVISIONS IOCAI STREET 12 AVG. p) 42 AVG. /2 AVG. 17 AVG. VARYN•5 VARYN-5 VARY.I-5 VARYN•S P NA Y 32 A D. 15 AV 5 5 S VARVN•3 VARYN•5 (E) (E) (E) (E) CO NEH A D 17 10 S W WR (E) (E) (E) I TERIOR SID YA 5I10 (I) 10 W Wq (ro ro,ro A IN 10 S 201 ISIS 2 20/5 20/5 (OWELLINQ UNRUCCESSORY (D) (D) (0) BLOO. EXHIBIT B 1 " TABLE 17.DB.WO - C OPTIONAL DEYELOPAAENT STANDARDS (Continued) (NIR: NDtRpWiBA) L LM M MH H R DEMUL BUILDING SEPARATIONS FROM TO FRONT 25 25 REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040-E OTHER 10 10 REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040-E HEIQHT IINITATpN$ 3S 35 35 40 55 OQEN SPACE REWIRED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE (GROUND FLOORlUPPER STORY UNfT) 1,000 / N/R 300!150 2251150 150/100 150/100 COMMON OPEN SPACE (A) (MINIMUM %) 5% 10% 35% 35% 35% USABLE PEN SPACE(A) (PRIVATE ANO COMMON) 60% 45% 40% 40% 40% RECREATION AREA/FACILRV WR REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040-N LANDSCAPING (F) REQUIR D PER SECTION 17,08.040-G FROM YARD LANDSCAPING REQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08,040-F ENERGY CONSERVATION N/R SQUIRED PER SECTION 17.08.040-I AMENRIE9 N/R WR REQUIRED PE SECTION 17.08.040-R A F%Clll(Mq UMO NECE96MV fOp 9EC0)OARY 91TEE16 AIO ARTERVLS A1D N NLLSEE AREAS SHALL BE OEPENgRR ON 1NE SLOPEGPACRY iACT011 CONfANEDN9EGTRN 1T.N p0.pM-B D AS YEA6IEED f11W iNE LlT WTE CUIB iACE W PIIBl1C AND PRNATE STREETS. REFFA TOTASLE 1I.M.OEAFO - D FOR AODIRMJfML SEIBIOR 1fDRYATM>t1. C. l1FR OE 111 BIpIV WRNN OIE IRMMIEO (1 ON FEET OF K aA L DETRICT FOR MOLTIPLE FAMLV OY4glElfl9 D. ADO TEN It%FffT F ADJACFM TO VL l OR W OE1111DT E. LE581HAN EIGHTEEN n• FEkT FROM BACK OF SpEWNIt WRHN 001100MNW , TOWNNOLEE DR APARTAIEM RFWNE9 AIJTDIMTIC 6MVfE POOR OPBEIti OIFMRi BETBACk ITEM 110) FEET YR/MNI F 9[E EMINV OARMiE ARE llSFO PW WNf TO SEGTIDFI I ] Oi.010 YRNIN SNOIE FIMIY OETAGFDBEW OETAgEO DEVFiOP1EM F. PERYETER W~BfMMO AFO Nf6110R lTRFET 1REE9 . G A 9FK1E FAYEY OETA01E0 DNFLLNOlE98 THAN NNE NUIaED IMIq 90DNE FEET WLL REW sE THE APPiIOVAIOG A COMRNMML USF PETIMR PIXEUAM T09EOTgN 170!088 . N, 3FgD lOT U11E OWF1lH08 PF1111RTED PWEIMMf T09ECTpN 110E0M P . I. REFEfl TO TAREI)040b~C.1 AND TABLE I)OIO,OM•D.3. J. SENIdI CRiEFNB PROJECTS ARE E%ELPTED FR04 THE fEOUNWFM . K TO ASEIRE T1MT 9YN1FN IMfS APE NOf CONCENTWITEO N ANY ONE APFA OR PROEOt. THE FOLLOVRq PERCEMAGE LBRTATYJNS OF THE TOTAL NDMPEROF DNRS 9NALL APPLY: iEN (10) PERCENT iQ1 EFFX;ENCY91UDq AND THFRY FNE (06) PERCEIR TOR ONE BEDROOM OR W TO TIFRY FNE IBS) PFACEM COMBNFD , SUBIECT TO A OONMfgNALLEE PEPYR .11E PIAANNG COMMBSPN LMY AUMORQE A GFFATER Miq D<EFFM:ENCY OR OIE IN BEDROOM INKS WNEM A OEVELOPMFM EJNERS NNOVATNE DESIGN WANF9 AND A OALANCE MI%OF uNrt g13E5 ANDTVPES L NN1134E AREAS, HERNT99HALL BE LIIARED TO TNNTY1001 FEET Ag SPECFED NSECTRMI Il3A0A~D.t EXHIBIT B2" Sectlon 17.08.040 - G G R ati ~i .' /F nits Where requued in Table 17.08.040 - C .developer shall provide recreational amemuta in conJunetion with common open space as follows 1. Development consisting of 30 uNts or less shall provide three a( the Collovnng recreatlonal ameNUn lal I.a+¢e open lawn area .one of the dmunslon shall be a nununum of 50 tat . fb) Enclosed to[ lo[ with multlple play equipment. (cl 8pa or pool. Idl eeq faclhry equipped wiN grW . picNC benches .etc . 2. Oevelopmrnt co[mlating of 31 uNU to 100 umU ahaLL provide another x[ of recreational ameNtles as described in Secton 17.08.040 - G1 or equwalent . as approved by the PlazWrig Commlaalon . 3. Development consisting of 101 uNta to 200 uNW shag provide fWe oC the following recreational amemtles or equNalent as approved by [he Planning Commission (a) large open Lawn ,one oC the dlmerWOn shall be a mmWUm oC 100 Int. (bl Mulctple encloxd tot IoW with multlple play equlpment.The tot lots shall be comeNenuy located throughout the sne. TThhe number of tat lots and their locetlon shall be subJtct to Pianntrrg CommWWn Ic 1 Pool aM apes . (d) Community mulct-Durpox room equipped with kitchen, dcfined areas !or qama. exemtxa .etc. (cl BBBQQ facWUea equipped with mWtlple grBL+. DicNC benches, etc. The BBQ faculties shall be conveniently located throwgghhout the site. The number of BBQ CacWtles and thetr locatlon sfiall be aubJect to Pia C mi~ston reNew anedyabpaQDroval. CHI Jooggtng/ Wwaudng t allett N eurcise etabaaketball, etc.l. 4. For each 100 uNts above the Mt 200 uNb, another sN of recreatlonal amerutua a, dexribed m Section 17.08.040 - G3 ahaL be provided. 5. Other recreatlorul ameniup not listed above may be mtwdered sub)eM to Plannug CommisMon revkw and approval. 6. Re4ted tecreadaul actmtiea may be grouped together and located at any one area of the cotmnon open space. 7. Dispersal of tecteauonal facWtles throwpphoot the site shall be required far development with multlple recreatonal facWtles. 8. Ail recreation areas or faculties required by this action shall be maintained by prvate homeownerb association ,properly owner or private assea+ment dUlttcts. EXHIBIT C " Section 17.08.040 - ({, K V151tor CaLk10g. For protects with pnva[e streets or driveways , vLVltor parking regWrcd by Section 17.12.040 shall Ix provided In off-street vLSitor pazking bays within ISO (tet o[ all dwelhtig uNts , Visitor parking shall be clearly delineated through pro r e to the satlsfactbn of the City Planner. Slgnage may include , but is no[ ted to: pavement marking ,tree standing sign deslgna0ng the stalls as vWtor parking ,and directory slgtu guiding visitors to the visttor parking area, EXHIBIT D " Section 17.08.040 - E @yjjQt_QySjy'irxuons Where requ ved In Tahle 17.08.040 - B and C .this section sets forth tronJmum requirements for bultding separaUOn and setback standards. 7ARLE 17.08.040 - E BUILDING SEF'AHAI ION ANU St I tlAt:R ~ I Arvufsnua DISTRICTS BUILDING SEPARATION AND SETBACK (AI M O MN (C) M (CI ( in lest 1 BUILDING 70 BUILDING (BI 1. FRONT TO FRONT a. No patio a recessed pale 30 30 30 b. Between patio IencenvaN laaa than 5 h. M hepM (~ without sidewak (F) 10 t0 10 weh sMewalk lF) 15 1S 15 c. Between patro IencNwall mae than 5 U. in hagM 20 20 20 d. Between bakonlas above pate IencenvaU more roan 5 h m negM 20 20 20 e, Between a patro lencenvall alld a dllldiltq waq 20 20 20 I Wan wmmpn patro lanca'wall 30 30 30 2. OTHER 15 15 15 BUILDING 70 ONE-STORY DETACHED GARAGFiCARPORT OR OTHER ACCESSORY 15 15 15 STRUC7URESIE) BUILDING TO CURB (E) 15(D) t5 (DI 15 (DI BUILDING TO CURB AT PROJECT ENTRY (pmb wall 20 20 25 or fence shall not Wgea Imo IM sel4arA aroa) IAI BCILDINC SHALL MEAN DWELLING L'MTS. IBI BUILDING SEPARAT70N STANDARDS FOR BUILDING TO BUILDING SHALL BE FOR TVO~STORY DEVELOPMENT ONLY. (CI ADU TEN FEET FOR EACH FLOOR/STORY AtsOVE THE SECOND FLOOR/5'IbFIY FOR THREE OR MORE STORY BUI[DINCS. IDI .wU FM1'E FEET FOR EACH FLOOR/STORY ABOVE THE SECOND FLOOR/STORY L'P 7D A NAIOML'M OF 7WENIY-FIVE FEEL' FOR THREE OR MORE SIDRY BUILDINGS . LEI PATIO WALL/FENCE AND PEDESTRIAN WAIJ(WAY MAY PROJECT INTO THE SE'fEACK AREA PROVIDED A MINIMUM 10 FOOT AREA SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE A.ND CLEAR FOR [ANDSCAPING. IFI BETWEEN BALCONIES ADD 5 FEET EXHIBIT E 1 " v Brrc~orie~s - Po ' ~r,~v ~R~o „I~is (~ rtNJs),~mt~/~Yn/ ~~K - ~c~s' EXHIBIT E2" na fA>.o ae ,Pea~reso,G-J~~,~IrQxy dypoaev fls~ !l~vss~s'oe1~4~J' ~' l.~r~r s+~cxu~s - ,roo s' li~ ~~N, n~ Y 1 ~ r "l * •• ` m 70' L' BiD7fa~iV,BItG~Y.uc7' - ZO' EXHIBIT E3" Bv,~w Bvi~ ~s w~~v l'etiukw ~'E~~GVt -.3e' '~, •-,40' -----• D7 r. n m Bryic,~.v Z,.y:rey dw~ ~9'O~.DOy~aronr~' arc EXHIBIT E~" QFiM7w ~'~cfiDiy du+rcvv; HluGs Section 17.08.040 - R Amen!tlcs To enhance quality oC life for multi-(amdy development, additional amenities shall ix required as follows: 1. Storage space. Each unit shall be provided with a minimum of 125 cable feel o[ extMOr lockable storage space. The storage space shall 6< located outside of the dwelling at grode or floor level and easdy accessible by the residents. The design of the exterior storage space shall be archltcc[urally Integrated and/or compatl6ie to the dwellings. The individual storage space amts can be located within [hc (u1Ty enclosed garages dcslgtfated for that dwegmg uNt. 2. Laundry factkty. Each unit shall be prwlded with a hook- up (or washing machine and clothes dryer m the interior of the dwellm~ : or ,common laundry [actllties shall 6e provided and 6e equipped with washing machines and clothes dryers at a rate of one washing machine and clothes dryer per flue units. Common laundry facdltlts should be conveniently located [or all residents within the complex. Common laundry Cacihtles can be within freestanding bull s .attached to dwellln~ amts or within the recrcatlon room. The des4Ln o the common laundry Iacili[fes shall be amhltec[uraily compatible to the dwellings. EXHIBIT F " Section 17.08.090 6endel Design 6uldeHnes Intent The intent of the guidelines is to assist the developer in urdersta nding and comp yang with the City's ste Mards for building and site design. The guidelines are based upon eom munity design goals as expressed in the General Plan, and encourage the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property along with associated facilities, wch as signs, landscaping, parking areas, and streets. The guidelines establish a Mgh sUMard for design quality but are Flexible enough to allow individual expression and imaginative solutions. A ppllcabiltty. The provisions of this section shall apply m all development within a res, en al dlstr'Icts, unless otherwise specified herein. Any additton, remodeling, relocation or construction requiring a building permit within any residential dktrict suWect to Development/Deslgn Rerlew pursuant to Chapter 17.06 shall adhere 14 tAese guidelines where applicable. C. Sf[e Plan Design Existing Site Conditions. Natural features should be uud to an advantage as e gn a eme we as, mature vegetation, landforms, drainage courses, grading, rock outcroppings aM views. Conversely, undes1ra61e site features can be minimized througn proper site planning and Dm1Mng orientation. 2. Bmldinyy Orientation, Placement of the buildings snail be done in a manner compati e6T wif~surrounding existing and planned uses and bmlding5. The setback from Streets and agjacent properties should relate to the scale of the proposed bmlding. Larger buildings require more setback area for a balance EXHIBIT G " ieC^. ...e.... of scale and compatibrlity with ayacent uses. Bml dings should be oriented along a norN-south axis, as much as possiDl e, to encourage energy conservatton. For multi-fatly development, attached dwellings should De provided rtth relief and a serene of variety. TMs could De acMeved by staggering the units. The placemerrt of buildings should relate m one another and create a variety of vier orierrtatlon for increased interest and openness This could be acMered by skewing or angling the buildings Buildings should be cluster around co• •on facilities 3. Access/Circulatton. The access and circulation should be designed to provide a sa a an a cent system for vehicles and pedestrians. Poi rrts of access shall comply with city access regulations and shall not conflict with other planned or existing access potrrts. Two poi rrts of access shall be provided for all but the smallest residential developments The circulation system should be designed fo reduce conflicts Detreen vehicular and pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on adiacent Droperties, com Dine access where possible, and provide adequate maneuvering areas Curvilinear streets are encouraged whenever possible. Vehicular and Dedestrian traffk shall be separated, m the extent possible, through the use of a conttnuous system of public and private sidewalks. 4. Parking Areas. Parking areas should be designed to minimize visual srupdi-T.~ of-tire overall project design. Parking areas should be screened from streets through combtnattonsof mounding,landscaping,low profile walls and grade separations. The design of parking areas should also minimize auto noise, glare, and increases in ambterrt air temperadme, This can be accomplished through sound walls, screening with fences or hedges, trees, and separation of parking spaces and driveways from residences (a) Sfte Design: Openness, reduced structure mast and convenience of use should be characteristics of parking area design as implemented by the following: o Parking areas (open and covered) shall be designed to provide parking spaces convenlerrtly located t0 the units they are intended to serve. o Long, unbroken 11nes of opposing garages carports on each side of a drive aisle should 6e avoided. This type of design results 1n a "constricted alley" atmosphere. o Free standing garages/carports should be located not to dluupt the primary view of reslderrtlal structures o YTers to landscaped areas should be maintained at the ends of drive aisles Vistas should not be obscured by facing yarages or carports. o Planter breaks ant special paving should be included along the parking asles. These features add interesting patterns to the driveway/parkway area rhythm. Section :',J8.J9C o In order to open up more of the parking area to adjacent landscaped areas and reduce the "alley" effect along Che drive aisle, offset facing garages/carports are encouraged on lengthy drive afsl es. (b1 Architecture: Garage and carport structures should ezMbit designs which are compatible, supportive and fully integrated into the overall architectural theme as implemented through the following provisions: o Long sbvctures present difftculties fn keeping proportions appropriate with the original design intent on the main st+vctures, and therefore, the garage/carport sbvctures should be limited to &12 cars. Retogrdze garage doors as an element of design rhythm and use to create varying patterns. Extensive use of single width garage doors should be avoided, The perception of increased density can result from a parking area with large numbers of garage doors. An overly repetitious pattern of doors can be monotonous and should 6e avoided o "fl7msy", "stick-11ke" carport designs wMth portray an add- on, non-permanent perception aro otdesireblecharacteristics of a parking area. Substantial design elemerrts should be integrated into the structure W Convey a more permanent concept for the carports. o WkMn multlpN opaea paraga aruetuna, afeh ear apmea anall w wMntw whn a wild wall a.t»pt wMn two or more apwaa ara daalpnatw t0 a a1ngN dwalllnp unit. For .InON Qpcrap. unite, IM Intlda dlmanfbn shall M Incraawd to a m(nlrrlUm of Nn loot Dy twaMy iNt for COnvanlanp of uu. 5. Landscaping/open Space. Landscaping and open spaces must be designed as an integTi{a{ prt~ect design and enhance the bu1101ng design, enhance public views ant spaces and provide Duffers and transitions where needed, with emphasis on complementing grading and softening slope banks. Landscaping must provide for solar access and shade to facftitate energy conservation. Open space should be proNded 1n concelltnted areas large enough to provde oppor4trlitles for at:tlre uses by group: 6, Fendn /SCreeMn . Fences and walls aro discouraged unless needed for a spec c screen ng or safety purpose. Mhere they are needed, color, material and variation of the vertical and horizontal planes are needed to blend with the site and building design. The use of any fencing or walls should be consistent with the overall design theme. 7. Lighting Adequate on-site lighting mould be provided [o ensure a safe environment wMle at the same time not cause areas of intense light or glare. Fixtures and Doles shall he designed and plated in a manner consistent and compatible with the overall site and building design character, 3. iJ tilittes and Rncillary Equipment, On-site utilities and equipment snail be oca rn nconsp cuous areas, away from public view. Nhere they are located in public view, they shalt be screened with a combination of material that best suits the overall design theme, 9. Grading. Development should relate to the naWral surroundings and minimize grog by following the natural contours as much as possible. Graded slopes should be rounded and contoured W blend with the existing terrain. Split- level pads, null t-uD foundattons, stepped foottngs, etc., can be used in areas of moderate to steep gradient Above all, graMng shall De designed to complement Che prglect's orientation, scale, height, design and transitions with surrounding areas. 10. Fire Safety. Development should be designed in accordance with Fire s c requlremertts for two paints of safe and ready access. Areas designated as Mgh fire hazard areas should miM maze fuel boil dup around residences through greenbelts or cultivated fuel breaks. il. ira nsltton of Density. The site plan should consider compattDlNty with surraun ng ne g ood through providing Draper tzansiton of density, particularly on infill sites agiacent to lower densities. Comparable densities, open space buffer zones, increased setbacks and architecWral compatibility are encouraged along common boundaries W provide proper transition of density. Clustering units can provide large open space areas as a Duffer, 12. Street Oesi n. Yary street pattern to reduce streetscape monotony. ur nears ets, col-de-sacs, front yard IaMSCaping, anO single-loaded streets are encouraged t4 provide streetscape variety and visual interest, particularly in the Low-Medium Ofstrict 13. House plottin . Clustering houses around common space, zero lot line, reverse p ng, angling house to the street, and side entry garages may De permitted if they provide sireetscape variety aM visual interest, particularly in the Low-Medium DfstHCt B~nl ding Design 1. Desl n Theme. A recogMZaDle design theme shall be established which fs comps e w surrounding planned or existing developments and should be based upon prominent design feaWres fn the immediate area (e. g., trees, landforms, hhtorlc landmarksl. Subtle variations are encouraged which Dravida visual interest but do not create abrupt changes causing discord in the overall character of the 1m mediate neighborhood. IC is nat intended Mat one style of arcMtecWre should De damtnant Dut that tndlvidual strucWres shall create and enhance a high quality and harmonious com munity appearance. ce,.;: ~n 1".ad, a~~i 2, .4rehitecture. The architecture should consider eompatioility ~.vi G, surrounding character, including harmonious building style, torm, size, color, material and roof Line. Individual dwelling units should be distinguishable from one another and have separate entrances. Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, projection or recession of stories. balconies, reveals, and awnings contribute to a building's character while aiding in climate control. Further, changes in the roof level or planes provide architectural interest. [n particular, Low-11edium density end mWti-tnmily residential development should be designed with upgraded architecture through increased delineation of surface treatment And Architectural details. The architectural concept should also complement the grading and topography of [he site. Seale. The mass and scare of the building should be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street locations and surrounding developments. Setbacks and overall heights should provide en element of openness and human scale. multiple family product type (i.e., apartment, condominium, townhouse) is discouraged immediately adjacent [o lower density single family areas. Atl attached projects adjacent to existing one-story single Pemily developments shall be one story, unless the impact of two-story structures on the existing one~tory neighborhood is fully mitigated with emphasis on privacy, views, end general compatibility. Buildings should emphasise horiaoatel as well es vertical appearance. 71ds could lx achieved b9 the use of projections a recesaiom of stoners, balconies, windows and doors, end changes in root levels and planes. N particular for multiple (amily product type, buildings over three stones should mrtvider stepping bade. 4. materials and Colors. Colors, textures and materiels shell be coordinated to achieve total compatibility o[ design. 7Tte materials end colors chosen shoWd complement tits ttuilding cherseter. 5. Si in Every building shell De designed with a precise concept Por adequate signing. Provisions for sign placement; sign scale in Celetionship with building end readability shall be considered in developing the signing concept. While providing the most effective signing, it shell also be highly compatible with the building end site design relative to color, materiel and placement. 6. Equipment Screenin¢. Any equipment, Whether on the root, side of building. or ground, shell be screened. The method of screening shall ne erchi tecturelly compatible in terms of material, color, shape, and size, The screening design shell blend with the building design. Whera individual equipment is provided, a continuous screen is desirable, ORDIHICNCE N0. 466 AN ORDINANCE OF TF~ C]TY COUNCII, OF THE CITY OF RANCFI0 CUCAMJN(iA, CAISFOIdFTA, APPROVING TFIII~A ViSfA PflftaFID CC22AR7ITY AMENQ4Qlf 91-02, AMFI~IDING VARIODS DE<.~EfDPFFII•27f STAlIIHItD6 ATm DFSIGN GUIDELINES FOR 1~81LTI-FAhIILY RFSIDFITPIAL DISIRICPS, AND MAICINC F7SIDINGS IN SUPPOIZI' TF4REDF A. Recitals. (i) On April 24 and continued to May 8, June 12, July 10, August 14, August 22, and Septevdrs 11, 1991, the Planrutg Commvssim of the City of Rancho Cucamongaa conducted duly noticed public heazings with respect to the above-refel:enocrl Terra Vista Planned aam1mity AmPlldmetit. Following the conclusion of said public heariiy on September 11, 1991, the Plarming Crnmi.ssion adapted Resolution No. 91-135, thpsek~yr reamnerditg that the City mcaicil adopt Terra vista Planned Wnnmity Ameidment No. 91-02. (ii) Jn September 11, 1991, the city Cou[ccil of the city of Rancho CuCamorrga mrH~xx:ted a duly mtioed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Ordinance. (iii) All legal e~mo.~+i cites prior to tl~e adoption of this ordinance have oonared. B. Ordinance. NOW, Tf~ORE, the City Caiuicil of the City of Fandco Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follws: SECITON 1: This mcmcil hereby' specifies arcl fircls that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Otdiriance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been revieosd and considered in conQliance with the California F}rviron- mental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declazation. SEXTION 3: The Rancho Curarronga City Council fitds as follows: a) 'Drat the Planning Conmission of the City of Rarrlro Cucamonga, follaeing a public hearing held rn the time and Wanner pte- scribed by law, reoaimerded approval of the Conmmity Plan text ame:~nem hereinafter describai to the City Council. This City Cwncil has held a public hearing in the time and Wanner pre- scribed bi' law arcl duly heard and considered said remmerda- tion. b) That this oonmmity Plan text amerdimllt is consistent with the Gemral Plan of the City of Rarldno ancamrnga. c) That this Cumunity Plan text amendment is cavsistent with the Development Cade of the Cit/y_ of Randto Cucmmilga. YJ Ordinance No. 466 Page 2 d) That this Commututy Plan text amecxtmnt will have no significant emiro=miental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SFX`1ZON 4: 'The City Council of the City of Ranci~o Cucamonga hereby approves Tet'r'a Vista Planned C4almmity Pme7l~tetlt 91-02 as follows: a) The 'Perry Vista rnmuiity Plan teat, Part N, Design c~iidelines, Sulsection "Residential Design c~idelines," mmien~-irg on page N-35 is hereby moendetl, in part, to rea3 as attacked hes+eto and incorporated herein by this reference. b) The Terra Vista Community Plan text, Part N, Design (;uidelines, Subsection "Residential Design gtidelines," commencing ~ Page N-38 is hereb~+ ametded in part, to read as attad~ed hereto and incorporated herein di' this reference. c) the Terra vista Conmunity Plan text, Part V, Community Develop- ment Stardarrls, subsection "Residential Developoent SYarNarrlc,'~ Table V-3, Building SetlaaC]cs far Cluster and Innovative Develop- ment (IM and Muses) is hereby amerded, in part, to read as attached her'ety and incorporated herein tN this reference. d) The Terra Vista Crnmmi.ty Plan text, Part V, Comamity Develop- ment Standards, subsection "Residential DeveloPllPnt crw..7arr~, for Medium and Medium High Density," ~ncirq on page V-14 and gilding on page V-15 is 2r_reYry amended, in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. e) 'Ihe Terra Vista Community Plan text, Part V, ~mmity Develop- ment GYattLirHc, subsection "Residential Develaprent cra~~~c " Table V-4, Building Setbac]cs for multi-family develcPnent (MH and H uses) is hereby amercled, in part, to read as attadied hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. f) The 'Terra Vista Community Plan text, Part V, Calmutity Develop- ment ~--'_--'_, subsection "Residential Developrent cra.~,.lc for Nigh Density," oomrencing on page V-18 is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached hereto atd incorporated herein bT' reference. SBCPION 5: 4t~e provisions of this Ordinance shall oat apply to those residential subdivisions wherein a Tentative Map and/ar Design Review has been approved prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. Rhe approval shall include the time extnetion as allowed by Section 17.02.100 0£ the Developnent Code and as modified fr<m time to time. SI7CPION 6: 'ihe Mayor shall sign this Oldi~ioe and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inlard Vallev Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, atd circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. l • J J j1 'J I _ I n _ J 1. ~= n ,_ i J J J _ ~ ~ ^ L %~ ~ j _~ - J J •• J .. - - - _ _ r. ~ ~ L = _ ~ T ' y n ~ ~ L L '~ n 'J .. J _ 'J ~ ~ /i 'i _ a TJ 9y _Ni Y'J^°J 9 ~~ y ~ U q ~J O J ~. _ v v a q ~ j j 9 ; 9 T ~ .n. n ^ ~ = .r ~ `> ~ 'A a s iiJ L' O y a ~ 'S T l T J r ~ ~ iIl 9 ~ L y ~ n n~; _ ~ 3~ r :~ v ~~ ~ u y v ~ -~, ~ yo ~~ a •~ rTc y y. y' ',11 ~ ~ N O S T 1 ~ U I •~ ' a 3 ~ a° T 9 y ~~ ~ u r ? ' - • • .J ~ ~. i i o .• ~ _ ~ a N O '~ Vi 'n LT t1 ;~ ~ ~~ 1C~ C_'1j ' n r a ~~ L°N,°g - q ~ L L 7 V ; U'f ~ ~ Y ~C a N l '~ O c ~ V a L N N - i 1 C J' C" J ~.t. .~.; a OV V C C L._ ~ m F a a a q" o~ w N "' y Y N ~ ~ 1 3« _ C ~p rq > ~' c _E ~$9~a 1a 7 v? ^ -_ u a c m C ~ a; c a c a ~ u> E ~p c'? ' ^'°ooE D V o n E c a a o q a .y n ? o y yyL .= ~aaL a~>• a ~~ 1.T> > O a« J q `~ C '~m~.`L ] cool«C m L am[ ] a te a Q- q `r U ~ ~ 'a'te E n> ] ~ q m '~ a '- ~ Q F- u V V= u. ~> o~ _• J_ ~ _J l l T_ C T n •~' n L J .7 n L "~ ^~ a ~ J ~ .J .C. y= N 'n y U n G "a s.3 ^-~n v~ ^u ~._ a ~ ~ ~ .; . y t a n ~ T f 0 0 V O a 'n T~ q- J 7' y= .1 L 7 ~ 3 ~~_ o.l m~ n~U ~> ``" c'+v+`o,m~~v..o~a ?=yam a ~ Y n V ? a ',~ j a ° ~ ~ a a J+'J V L~ N u L Y JI Up1G iyUN 9'y3 7=.~ L7 nN ~ ~~> .~ > j t_ ~ L T y L y " a j a C y W Cy n ,n O ~ C r q._ ,s .. q ~'J T' q a 2 >• C C L '°' Ct C v C C C 2' 3 L N d ~~ a a C O .7 - q q C .a. V' a s m '7•~~, '~ q a u ~ ~ Of F- O .L. O ~ ~ E 3 L d vOi ~ C 3 ~n • ~ C C N I ~ ;o a a a a '4 yy a° C a VL`. ..~ N ~ ~ J ~ > i C O y a N O a a g C n '_ _ CO ~ >. OIL L y r O T q in C _ 7 =;~ ru q~ C w 3 c ~ v m 3_ '^ ~ a' L o q L^ a_~~ V; y O L g C U J+~ :. y J .. y .T. ~ ~ - n ~ E6Tn 6'•11q L e L' m ~,n> .r O 6 C y C C ~.. a ~+ W 'S n 3 mO r oG e q O C R ~In L ~" ~^ .i. N T, O Y B C U O ~. L~ 3 VI U 9 L^1 y 6 y c 0 8 q $ a s a a oia.- - g c n n 3 li y y a y U C N a u L 3 q n a v~ ° .. c o ~ 1 0_ ~. ~ V - g L V m m a ~ .: v Y ' o _ ~J`3 =~~ _Lnn. ...n .J-od "J ` J J T =' ^ tJ 3' :' -' •J .. _ L n L n _ J . - 1 . ~ J n T~ J J _ r 9 ^ C n n ~ Y n L J~: 7 9 J^ ~ n ~' .i .i C ~ V a '• _ n J i U J . - «^ J O n ` 9 L L v C « >= L U> - C [J1 9 L ., U . '] n ^ . ~ l> C~~ L ~~ d y . . .J y O m o m V l.. ~~ ~~, O= u L= 9 ~] _ ~ w V a 3 D 0 ,y ~._ ~~~ m ~-« ~ > O , U N ... ` C A N N U' N .1i ~ U O i S ' ~ ~ ~ c . - 'J7 L 'J ~ L U U L n J3y~Ey y J."' Y 1 9NCL in ~>~d.n J7 C .. L O ' C a9y'J '1`~1.Cj da197 ^ V ~ C ~n 'Ju~ ^_.~OC`C~ 9 `Q Nr: rOr ~ _ _ « ~ -~ N n'J« « N y ~ 9 y .. y ., r_ 0 0- N ~ C ndOr C. 'J +J U fJ O._ W _.~ N d L C v] v U > L v O-L1'-9TU C'J 9cG9-cc 9E Y d>dOdW L>90yL vn9?.._ . . ; O J a p y C n ''•' C - a E V1 . 9 >. O n G- • l J d 9 L • "_ '_ v .a L?~ 1 3 W ~« N C«~ d Q 9 ~ - an d O~ ~ N 'C r L O ~ L 2 d .~. n .n- m ~ L O N .` ~> L p 7 .) q] - V .. A ^ U 'L d « _ a S O (G IO 3 a ._ ~^ __ L l L ~ 9> > ~ _ y N y u C_ C. 9 J d d >. C >. L1] ] c'- N E ~ c 9~ ~ 9 l U T ~ - 9 u o C~ c r ~'« c~ ~:^'~ ~ c ._ n " ~ ~ f0 >' ~ ° o a '~ > ~: ~m 3 ~~ ~ n ] c ~' E y, . .: . .> `. o ~ ~ c a . o .C ~ . ,«_ ; u i ~ _ ~ L N n G ¢ N n 9 9-] O L a i J.~ O C O d l>~ u ~n >> 3 Er «H~E~ C._.«~a9m y u L O b C L.r O~ l%]] u.P O E LL ¢ ] ~a V d6a QN.C H.~.n ~~n 19TL '_ida3 VI`>•N L`NCd L >,O j ` C~ d d q C `^ O ~ c -L ~ O~C ^ L C Y N pp r• U v r = N L L e ~ `0 3 c~ p ` „ d c 2 a o n e o . m d "; o N L ~ v o 3 y «~ a ~ _ a_ c g a a ~ n d ' ° =V~N 1o C j~o'°dyt"N`d a:c u E~ E K a,«I m~a 9 c>'~L~Lma L u~au o'~'u yo mco u o L q ] v o i ce ~ d T 3 w a o > aEQ~ 'a : C c~l~-~ yaw ~~-~u , u o._N v Eo o _^oa CLd L 9 a y c ' L o cuvOm ~ o. ,; o m m a ~ ° u ` n ` N y . o~ o $ a. y N w d. v a a =' j~ u e L C c> C i m- 'm o 0 ~ s i _LO. ~y >'0 .;y Nan m~~m u L9 n'ue °u 'ice L aL~=" Nca - o a ~ yc a ua ~,v i $ m u ; >. . d N N ,~ _ o j ._ ~ ~ c !^ „ m o3 ] T L v` a u o N a > n c E` oL. ? E-a- m~L N ~yL, °03..' -~~g c aN d9 E,'n~ mm A °'> « 3 E wu E~di ~ o.° `e«o. ,, o o .. .. ~ 1L '_v ~oN _ eJ U E V L L .~ a O d a a a„~ t~ o= N O O ~« « J b ~ 'y' O W 6 Y~ y 0 V O L C ~ .r Co d~ d ~` p y y ~ y L ~ N .' _ l J ~ '= U ~ N a d N d y L '~ « y 6 'L' W ^J y N - 9 9 1 > J VI E _O d 9 y N 0 9 C; J 9 >+ O 9 U d 9 _ _ ~ U 9 yy 2 q C ~ ~ V C~ C a N 3 C L >. N U ~ 6 C ~ C u ~ i` p y LL ~ .' C L d O. d O j N ~ G u 0 u ~ ~ L 9 >. g d . . N C ~ ~ O L '~ d ~ C G C ; O a L C. J, L ._ p L^« 9; d m'- J d c ~ u 7 m N c]_ u ~ w a c a '` a k a a y ` p ~ N N y E ~'w 'v ~~ E= J O~ g J :J m ~> L C ~ L ~ r~ L '0 O> v in b L w A K t E'- ~' 9 E c r: ~ d 2 m ~.. ._ N« ,9 u d L ~ ~ 5] 3 e u o o N a? n ~ ~ ~ _ u a 7 i W N 0 2 Q F z W a 0 ". J JS1 D O~ r a O Z Z W J /~ 9 ^i~``. 0: O LL N Y V Q m w N J z O 9 c ~ ~~ o t m A L Y rv A U r.~ A a a M m a .n d in ~ H m x n c L N H £ cc c ac Y m _ EEE ';:p ; w ~ ~ ~~ ~ih n mn ~ e o ~ ~a o -a O ~ O O1 Oi N q > > L L y N N N ~p ~ r a y n } ^! 1~,fJ a ~ N ry N v ~ o+ m N N :fN N ry i C C C 'E~E'E ~~ ';~ ~ C '; v a ~~ ~~ ~~ N m _ ~ _ ~ N mmr i ca ~ u e °~ °~ o N a N ~ ~ A m ' g' a a ~ M n '^ m in ~ _ v I N ry~ ( ~ C C C ~ a ~ C ~~ o I ~ E E E A 'q $ ';a iy ~ ~ ~rv ~ ~ Mmm h O _ ° o ~ mmm Z a io '~ o • n ~ H ~ N W J E O p~1 N ^ C L T F J T rv .~. .~ .. L d v- A ~ ~ L L N Sac L v d c ~~ ~ .y. L ° ~ m L o S J o ~i ~ N E y ro v YNL ^'t u N ~ + m f ~ m a L > a d e t d "hC a . ?; L o `m j d u ai ~ c ~~ v > ~ a. v S . '~ v ti .. Q` t,c i o o. T ~ r o. ~~o E q"'a ~ ~ c ~aoc o. ~ F N ~ a Xy o 0 0 3 H •- _ A E T - - c ~ Q W JQ ~' u 3 N f jrv ~ U `' t U ~ W. Q r ~ a z `N ~> J W F s ~ m Z y v f I ut J v ~~ 5 Z ~ ~ I a ~ I O Y` J ,_~XVJ W w I ~d~~ a_ ~ N O O .. Z ~ ~ Z J Z i I .J Q r ! > is J u ,~, M .. 4 Vt H C y LL i ~ ii o u+ o v ti v ~~ ~~ ~~ ~v ~Y NY L.C L C L C va va va N u d u J U 0 0 o e o 0 O O o ~ N Y LL E N ~ L y C U i ~ C W 9 'O ~ ~a ° ~ N O Y E i p VI ii ! U 5 o ~ ~ C U 2 I m y H L v V ~ '` i .c y O - 0 ' ~ v O - a L U J ~ j i . p ¢ 2 V I Q" Q i ~` L N T E C1 N m o p v ~ ~ a U c ~ c 0t " v E ~ ~ ~ E n D L m Y ? _ J O y ` m m _ W ~ L E L AL„ ~ ` 0 E u o in ~' _ c c c >' ` 7 ~- L N ~ ~ Y .Y.i V d C c '~ v ~ O d O, v m ~ u E U in N .. iO 1 G -~ v u ` U v ~ a o L O L ] y N 1 ~ ~ ~ a 0 o _ E m ~ '" ?; v u ~ ~ " ~ E y ^ o `. w L L a ~.n n i ~ L N T '.; d p ~ V "~ " a ~ o ° i a y V ~ N N ~ T ~ n ~ Y ~ Y 3 y L d q O C i U 7 '~ ~p O L O C u a N L u ] ~" ~ ~ ~ L y O ~ O H` O L ~ y Y ~ r v y F fJ N L ~ G1 n ~ ~ ~ O ~ - ~m rJ L ~ T T^ O O m ; L C O > C L _ _ m Dt ~ v O ~ ~ ~ y d N - y , QI N S N ~ L ~ E LL ~ C ~ L J Y u N L ~ 3 ti Y y ~~ ry o~ ~~ ~- E u .N. T N T a s a d N •• C T T N U c m'~ ~.~ ry .n N~ N y :O E y ;i v o V p m LP m t L> N a u v i o- »u r~m'vm ~cv.~;~ac 'c 'm A 5 as ac ~a ~ ncv c~N uN~ r m ~ ~ F N o.a ~ E y acv `ov ~~u;,.~c9 .°.' ¢ No E 5 ] ..t ' oya vctuc ~o_auo~ ~;c nEmc.- L o a y a .. •L L .d v a n E cm ~uao ~~yc aca N m 5 V ~v a F , %n Q1u L NOI~wD 4 ~ ~i C LC i3 ~»RC LO> aC C.q y N y LN GN m 2U E•m •>'.u-. dt , mCL9~mHU n i ~° b vu uu .. ~o . . o •- a u ~ ° a~ > 10 N N N u c d a ~ ~ w t • c ( { -° c d d ? ] ~-N N + . .+ a _ ~ m a I f C_NaN L ON__Nd Y C C y yI N ~> N'~ NN ry y NIL d v A L N 9da V O a V w L c ~c3 a E a m ~ y OI a 019 c c~ c °~ 01 c y °~ Q 10 N t ua ~ N9CL« ' add da~- mu ` > d j ] Y jP ~j 0' m Ins ~ ~ ~j ]$~ mtn iaEV 10 ~~ _> N u my a N N N N M C v d m m m m '°uuua N cavuNV :°. . / iii N a_ u v a •r CL yL~ Ci LvggC U F; v ~ U C N N N 3 T • d NL 7 Lv udi uibC A UTO L T01d T ~ o E u E A$ v E ma a ° N'j v° m . N .. NL _ . y EN N.L.=~L C d Op C «JL v ~U i 'E A~ ' 5 SL=a~iNCw9~av` 7 • LL u c d .ESN y t v ~a E N « ~ N p 1 L y~ q y C '~ N d Q y y y tL0 N O d 0 T L« 9 W L L o ~ d- N U J a s C O' ~ t AT~ O«NdL ¢ c ~'Y ] N N E L« .. Qd m C ~LL Y A ~~ d 9 N a~ ETC Nv N ]LU A• L v 9 C 9 p R ~ W ~n j9 d ~.n ' LL U C 4 x o N ~ C~O . 7.0 '^ ya N ~ q ~ N tq y a N u . .E ~ c . '0 N N ~ 1A3 y m ' E C ~ ~ C N Q ~ L7 •• d L N O u O N R d«Ip I(1 `~ OI ~ O. 10 d dN A vf C 2 ~d 9• p ] p Gm . ] LTNS CL"TWLp «Y9 CY R N q N S V« C w w E y y d v N ~: u J u 9 O Y 1 y C; L x~v ; R V y E l 0 ::~ ci tic vm ai al~d u, O C ~ _ c ~ a n ~ m ' 4 4 NL ~L~ 'c 9 N E a~ v mP C N .di ^ a ~ qc alN mo E? T ~ C ~ p :~ a } ~ T 9 P 9 ~ ~ l pg ~ ~ u E p , LLyLy ~ L; y y 9 T ~~~ ] J A y ~ 0 0~ d j C p C y y ] P.'= O ] d O ] m LL.-> Ur Ody~ NLY«= l mLNN mt c ~ E a ~ in ~ A _ a v Y O ~ • E E Ey a m QI L P C j m E ] E 'c E P N m U N v 4 O R d Ot L Z `x c rv S i> 0 ~9u U p v gU L 'yG N E y~ s E ~~ E c ~ to n E s m a N o u m ae 9 v Z u E Z a .. i d m a ,c,'~ mn Q A 3 y~ a C~ ,~ T p v ~ aU ~ c 3.D uC L ~_ L ~ 7 ~ .~ Of .,. a N .,,,. N a L X ~ s 'a' ~'~E ~' a m ~° °n ~~ L o c fjm . > v NQ CIQ m~ m Gl~q L~ L ~ C a T N N- a O a L r a C m L" r a n r L u o L r L > o a o•-r o rEa+aci~..°a~oa.~v Gov amvo.c `n'o~c a-L3NE.°,~ o~ F i rv c °~~ 3 N~ a y d a N r a a y ~ L_ 7 N~ ~~ TF ~ U Z ;~ O .°L. ~~ ~ U .D U'ipG N ~,c ?'g v a N a o a.o a ~ y9 ~ouivU10 C cto iO JO~o vc E r nL .°. U r~~~ L~ c.. y r N m N• '° n a v ~C v Oil ' 9 ~ ~ j u g `o A ~~ L vi ~ L a 'C L T ~ ~~ ry m y A ~~.°. Hor o.°, WL"- a~N 9 C^ 3 0. a C C L o .. 4 L v u v uPL L'p V«'~nrL a~m A a Anrn a'pCaL v r ~ L .~ L A y p ~ r N r Oae p„ ';~NT r o ,~ ~ a y a ui ~ Nag n;moEaNmLv ~,n _C~ C 6AL OL3 l o N a ~ y as a~ v> N a~ Tw uai L.d ~ °v+ai °ccrv O aN9 vEva apf ,oL,~-o c n> n$ .c N n o N u N u n._._ y N" v c c~ t c a y o m~ aa~~C CCq aG0 Ear •~~ ui v m v v A E G N!_~ a> nL C > L vL°3a La,~~a~c ~,V Cr N 6'O~ L.?CC9 mr a C .°: ; L E a m E y° N .Ny gno9 ~E na j'N y a ~ R~ O H G N O~ryNANNW NC $v 01a d a A7L a N a='HL aB8d rp> r~~ O N N N w N (p n N L v" n v E 0 v i A c am N ~ a> ~ a m ~c N C C ° a9 ~ y N L ~U =a N 7 C ~ ' ~ u ~ a E,a e w~ o La ; a ~a c o 7 ~ N a ~" i 'u E a ~o ~ N O+ 'O v > r Cr a S9 G C '_ m v C a L C ~ c 3 u a .0 a ~ L Em yu C ~' 9 ~? ,« ~O N N U A N y a N v E v e ~.^n L N a C ~- a O.a - N ~ C Q 9 y m L >" ~ ~ N v a 9~ m> y T .E E a ~ ~ .~ ~ v 0 ~ g ~ L n L n E jm ~ '^ o L E a v N 7 a ~' '~ E J.E3L a a a A H E J ~ E a C ry 'E u a i c ry N m v N rn C D CI u v C 9 °J v L T~ N , N a v~ u ~ n ~ C ~ m v r .~ ~~ O -_ ~ r (J Q J ti 1 S L n U v e^ 2 r E ' a 0 O > y W J J ~ m < LL ~" F s O N Y U a m w ut U Z J m Y y as ~ C N Y O amain Y A r~ O N N N U 01 u c <a V ~ m m L1 Y N d d N i a c a m C v c U OI C 9 a M .n mm ~ Z ? ~ Z ~ E E v ~ P 01 ~ q O' U_ a ~ am > 7 N A T q ~^ ~~ 1 ~'_ ~~ _ ~ p z ~~ r~ ^, ~~ o Co 00 0 0 ~p n n . c c 0 0 c c 00 N N ~ i = ~ ~ i ~i i ^C C y~ y R N ~ ya W N W E E ~ JI N N N N N j ` ~ ` '~!. c Vf N N m If) ~ N LL LL ~~ 'm,~, r~ K _ ~ ss s^ my m ~~ ~~ a *~ o eo uio e c 3 i t ~~ y o i ~ O y i i ~c c ~- ~ N~I~ O~' N N ~v mm _ a s mm a s EE N 'y u~i H ~~ m f N ~~ ~~ ~ y' N m N 'm A ~m Htq n ~ r u ';'a N r a'i M~ ~~ ~~ ~~ a oe u~a o 0 ~ e d T ~ ~y L <L y Cy Gy ~ < G y ey Q., , O J rv~ a m~ ~ m~ VI m L N m L in m L ~ U b ~' a wco ~ ~c`o ~ $c`o ~ VAC aL y ~ mo ~i y mo aL v c ~ L L ~ U < y y y y m$ Aye 1. y cd$ O. y y m~ S ~L, F~ y y y0 /- y y ao Vt E O; N yy ; N U; N mmUU ; N E j ~ 3 N - 3 in J ~ LL ~JN taJm YJm Jjm i i LL 0 rJm m ~ y r i i . r . 7 J v a N r- N eYi 2 a LY L Y L t L 9 > L L ~ 0 m O O ~ a ~ E ' m a ~ ~ S o ° ~+ ~ c~ m a V ti I'. d a ; ~ d ~ ~ 01 a a L? q N ~ L Y C ~ V IG N 'O Y m ~' L m y '^ m `m E a~ ~ N `o aN O n~ H N = a L •` 1 C .E c a ~ y m o y 56uE O Y~ T NaO O$yY r ~ m a ~ .°. ~ E.".V '~o3W ~ w m U a ~.E ~ v Y m.; O O Cyy 8 W N C d~ ~~ Y y N C Y L 'a C 9 6D ;YK a~fO "' M.~ yyj ~. N O. O Y' YY~O C Y O. V O a am .F.AO V Y o aV ~ ~ :: :: THE e~t~ m rL .. Y a L OiO o~Y~ a v.. N u ~E .>_ ~ ~ euV 99 u E~ E a g G ua~ ~..o~q y L u a ot~ E _ C; upiw Y `o ip OL ~yuoo yy. o c Y ~ Y ~ a u o ~~ YgF~~ 9 O• d a L [ y ~ , .p O t G Y Y v C N 7~ C ~ ] L Y N Zf Q ^9 mE uE ~ N a coc eu"aa °u o f a c L u L:~ y a k Y~ 5 ;o a; ~Y a o a LVL4LLL e~^,°~ St NU TC MY a N N ~`O `UV~ r ` a E L ~ C ` ` L Y G ~ ( xc~ y u m_ ~o a ] a L OI'~ ~t~ppCV C Ma u~ M L u a « S ~// aCp3a N N Y a Y N.N. d ~ T Y~ j 1 a CCa y u C O J ry N" y Y Y N 3 99 N ~ N ~O a y i N y o ~, E~ c a .: / q 7 °ayiC c 1u~ ~yy N Y ~ C t Y~ a .. m Y O N~ O ~ 9 O1 i0 a ~r N L y N ~~Vl Y ~° a v c 3 `D m~ «~ c` 9 u 5:7 5 0 EN t= `m` ~~ a u cLN °~~$e L y ^`L O F .. a. N~ a O C Q N l m N g U 6 in .o n ~ Oi r A Y J U y I 'n C L^ S I T I J' 9 V V O V ~!_~° "~ ° J c "" G O; c .y ~.~ o ~ _ ... ~ " ~ C - 3 N J rn ~_ Yd O ~ J~O C'n U.-1 VC 1~ G1 - a '4 ; C L - ' '?tea ~Z' C Y .J O• r a a L 9 • ~ J- K Q p N 'JC~9 j Ou'~ ~ Yay T C p 0 N' y a L j y '0 N ` ~ ~ " a u N y a C> D a "~ J O~ N d 0 a O a ` a C ~ .. 2U .. . YL.. ~ N E N c ~~ _ c~ N 3 y~ o G a c E ~~ L~O a u D C a a.c i a ~.` C LONG 1 ~ a ; N a C y D ~'J N 0 ~ 9. . . - Y O"J a y d C a ' ` % A a T _ VVV N y «° L ~ E a a d ~ - ] a c oam m ~ o'° L ..~a~ . c s m~~ > i ] a .~ m> o u c o ~- L o L a 3 rn E U o° ~ ' ' ~ m N a E m u n aNit oEO y rn N ~ 'a N C a ~ ~ 9> 1 E a .. c ~ E.. ~ _ ~x u v~ ~ L O a ~ ~~ rn ¢ c a` 3 u N c e i ai a c y 9 Y rn V L W > y .V ~ C L r ~ .. L ° 3 a Z ~ N G A ~ N 9 a N U N N[ G n .' rn ~ u a a y a c ~ ~ ~ A a ~ Y ~ L . o.~ N w ~ ~0 N N v L ~ u q ii 01~ 1 a ° m i m o+c d N a c "' d '^ c u c' A N m L E N T a L C Q a U> L > 1 .a V ; > "' i v q O ~ Q'0 W N r N I o N L F ~ l y G ^ z °: `O o T y E"N .c o E a m ,~ NC rnn a~ m J W~ u ] N d C C ' a Y Y a G G ~, ~~ ° y ~ , ~ E u v a a ° ~~ ~ u ~ d a v ' > > " a . ~ i m p ~` a n C v _ S..o- c` o ~ • m > OImIN7Q4CE NO. 467 AN ORIJlHnNCE OF 150: CITY COUNCII, OF 15~ C1TY OF RANCtb CUCAMONG4, CAI.IYUR7IA, APPROVING VICTORIA PiANNm QfM[7[,TiPY AMFNIMENP 91-02, PMP2IDING VARIWS D~EI.ORgI7P S17ilIIlAid7S AND DESIGN GUIDII,IIiFS FLA2 MNLTI-FAMILY RESIDF]71'IAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING F72~RiG5 IN SIJPPDP:P 1NRRD~F A. Recitals. (i) On April 24 and antinued to May 8, Jufle 12, July 10, August 14, August 22, and Septaober 11, 1991, the Planrung Commission of the City of Rarx3lo Cuc<vrotga conducted duly noticed public heazitgs with respect to the above-referenced Victoria Planned Caimmity Ataetrfiplrt. Following the oonclu- sion of said public heazimg on Septeniter 11, 1991, the Planning crnmission adopted Resolution No. 91-136, thexrby remmYetiding that the City aoimcil adapt Victoria Planned Crnmmity Aire7dtmnt No. 91-02. (ii) On ~tanber 11, 1991, the City Cau~cil of the City of Fandto ooadutted a duly roticed public hearing and oonclided said h9arirg prior to its adoption of this Or'dinanoe. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Orditartce have oaanrred. B. ordinance. NOW, 154RFICS2E, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaronga does hereby ordain as follws: u^FS:I'CON 1: This Cautcil hereby specifies arc] fircls that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true std correct. SI7LTION 2: This m~mcil hereby finds std certifies that the project has been reviewed arcT considered in mipliance with the California IYrviran- mental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this mtmcil hereby issues a Negative Declazation. SDCPION 3: The Rarxito Cucamonga City Council fills as follows: a) Zhat the Planning Crnmission of the City of Ihvtdw Cucamoga, folloditg a public hearing held in the time std mauler pre- scribed by law, reaaarerdeti approval of the canmmity Plan text atnerdment hereinafter described to the City Council. 7tfi= City Council has held a public hearing in the time arcl manner pre- scribed by law std duly heard and mnsidered said reoamrnda- tion. b) shat this Camwtity Plan text amendtnertt is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Fardto Cucamonga. e) 1t~at this ~miunity Plan text amercLnent is consistent with the Development OxTe of the City of FanK3w Cucamonga. ~~ Ox[linarre No. 457 Page 2 d) 'itvat this Caimavity Plan text aioencLatnt will have no significant ernrirolmm~tal i~act as provide3 in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SIX'CiON 4: 71re City Coravcil of five City of FNY3vo Cucamicxya tvereby approves Victoria Plarniad Crnmvnity Ametthmsit 91-02 as follvs: a) The Victoria Ccmamity P1?n tP+ct, Part III, Section I, Regula- tions avxl Stacdards for Oevelopmrzvt, subsection "Residential Design (~ridelines Medium Density Residential" a~rvcivq on page 22a, is kvexehy amercled, in part, to read as attadval hereto and incorporated herein ty this referux~e, b) Zhe Victoria Ccmmmity Plan text, Part III, Sectim I, Regula- tiass and Stard~uds far Development, trr~*;~ "Cluster avd Innovative Housing Setl>ac]cs," mmr?s~cirg co page 225, is hereby aensdsi in part, to re~i as attadved hereto and incorporated herein try this reference. c) 'Ifve Victoria Camwvity Plan text, Part III, Section I, Requla- tions anct bYattiards far DevelopmlK, subsection "Residential Development Statdards Mer3ium High Density iesidential," caamncirg on page 229, is Irmtry ametd~d, in part, to read as attadval hereto acd incorporated Iverein tH this refereme. d) ltroe Victoria Ooamvnity Plan text, Part III, Section I, Rerivila- tion<, and stardarcls for ilevelopnent Standards, subsection "Cluster Housing Setbacks," ~mxicitg on page 231 is hex'ebi' amended to read as attadved hereto acci incorporated herein Vy this reference. e) the Victoria Crnmmity Plan text, Part III, Section I, Fr/gula- tions acd etarrl~tr~ for Developiielrt, subse<tion "Residential Daveloptnent Statdards High Desity Fesideartial," canne:vcirg on page 232, is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein Uy this referervx. f) 'ihe Victoria ~vity Plan text, Part III, Section I, idegula- tiors and FtandaTric for Developnettt, sut>eec:tion "Cluster dousing Setbacks," C0mlK'rC1MJ On page 233 is herelry amerckd t0 read aS attached hereto and inr~rporated herein by reference. SD:.TION 5: 'True provisions of this ordinance shall root apply to those residential subdivisions wherein a'Pentative Map aM/or Desicg~ Review has been appzwed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. 'ltve apprrnal shall include the time extention as allowed 1Ti' Section 17.02.100 of the Development Code and as mxlified from time to time. SECTiDN 6: 4he Mayor shall sign this ordinance afd the City Clerk stall cause the same to 6e piblished within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin, a newsp3perr of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Racxito Cucanrmga, California. 9g ORDINANCE N0. 967 AN OPDII~NCE OF THE CPPY CODNCTL OF 7HE CITY OF RANCHO C[1CAhIkA'•A, CAISk~IWIA, APPROVING VTCIURIA PIANNm IX~AIDNI'M AMTNC1gNP 91-02, AMRJDING VARIOUS DEVFdDPMENP S1:4NRAR~S AND DI'SI@I QJIDEI,INFS FUR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDTNPIAL DISTRICTS, AND tN~IL1PK' FII~IDING.S IN SUPTOAP Tf{FRIDF A. Recitals, (i) W April 24 and continued to May &, June 12, July lo, August 14, August 22, atd September 11, 1991, the Planning Cwmussion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga corrlucted duly noticed public hearings with respect to the above-referenxprl Victoria Planned Community Amendmes~t. Follaaing the conclu- sion of said public hearing on September 11, 1991, the Planning crnmission adopted Resolution No. 91-136, theretry recamierrlirg that the City Council adopt Victoria Planned Commmity AnerrLiwnt No. 91-02. (ii) W Septanber 11, 1991, the City Camcil of the City of Farx~w Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said heari~ prior to its adoption of this Ordumnx~. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinanxz have oocurrsl. B. O[dinance. NGW, TFiE3tEt0RE, the City Caiuicil of the City of Rancho Cucamonxja does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the ordinance are true and correct, SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in o,:pliance with the California Ihviron- mental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative declaration. STX'PION 3: 'The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finis as follows: a) That the Planning Convnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner pre- scribed by law, recamnendeT approval of the Cmvfunity Plan text amerxLnent hereinafter describer) to the City Council. 'this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and marvw_r pre- scribed by law and duly heard and considered said reaamnesda- tion. b) 'That this Covmau~ity Plan text amenchnent is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) 'That this Crnmwlity Plan text amerxfi~ent is consistent with the Developmnt Cade of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. qq Ord.in<anoe No. 467 Paqe 2 d) that this Cmma~ity Plan text amarriimnt Will have no significazrt envirorniental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SFX'fION 4: the City Camcil of the City of Randlo ~ramw9a hereby approves Victoria Planned Comauiity AmetxLnent 91-02 as follows: a) The Victoria Ca~mmity Plan text, Part III, Section I, Regula- tions arc3 Stardarrls for Develclment, subsection "Residential Design Guidelines Medium Density Residential" camencirg on page 224, is hereby amended, in part, to read as attadteti hereto and inwrporated herein by this reference. b) the Victoria C<mauuty Plan text, Part III, sec.,tion I, Regula- tions and Standards for Developmnt, subce~.tion "Cluster and Innovative H'cusirg SetbacJcs," cam~ncing on page 225, is hereby amended in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. c) 'Ihe Victoria o~mmity Plan text, Part III, Section I, Regula- tions and Sta,~,.~tG for Development, ~.^^•ion "Residential Developmnt Starclarrls Medium High Density Residential,° mmencirg on page 229, is herelry amercled, in part, to read as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenoe. d) The Victoria CUaamity Plan text, Part III, Section I, Regula- tions and °L''""- for Development Standards, a'~-~ion "Cluster Housing setbacks," oamwncing on page 231 is hereby amended to read as attad~i hereto and inwrporated herein by this reference. e) the Victoria Crnmmity Plan text, Part III, Section I, Regula- tions arcl Standards for Developmnt, subsection "Residential Development Starriards Riqh Density Residential," cx~miencing ~ page 232, is herrty amended, in part, to read as attad~ed hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. f) the Victoria Community Plan text, Part III, Section I, Rs3ula- tions and n-a+r3`rdc for Development, subsection "Cluster Housing setbar]cs," oamwncirg on page 233 is hereby amended to read as attached hereto and incorporatei herein by reference. SECTION 5: the Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the city clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least onoe in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation publishe3 in the City of Ontario, California, and ciralated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. t~f7 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (continued I 4. Medium Density Resldentlal (" M "Land [Ise Plan Designation) Land designated as Medium Dcnsi[y Residential Is intended for residential development [hat ranges from 8 to 14 dwe111ng uN[s per adjusted gross acre. The following regulations arc appilcable for these areas: a Cse Permitted: detached or attached cesidential dwellings nol exceeding fourteen dwellings per adjusted gross acre. Inclodutg .but not IkN[ed to 1. Single CaMly dwdlings -attached or detached , including, but not limited to townhouses, tnplexes. (ourplexes, and condomWUms. 2. Cluster housing. 3. CommuNly facWties, page 241 h Site Development Standards 1, Cluster housing. lal Butlding site area : 3 acres minimum. Ibl Building site coverage : As permitted by required setbacks and pnva[e open spatt (cl Butlding setbacks See butldmg setback diagrams on the fotlowing page Cor typical setbacks. (dl Butlding separation The standards from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code shall appty. lei Butlding height : 40 feet maximum. 10 Butldlnq site width and depth As permitted by required setbacks. (gl Transition of density The site plan should consider compatlbiL[y with surrounding neighborhood throuf(h providing proper transition of density, partlcularly on in ill sites adJacent to lower densities. Comparable densities. open space bulier zones, Increased setbacks and architectural compaubllRy arc encouraged along common boundaries to provide proper Iransltlon of dens)ry. Clustering of units can provide large open space azeas as a buffer. Ihl Ali cluster housing development and mul[I-family development within the Planned Community area must comply with the Design Cuidellnes as outlined to the Residential Section of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Cade, 2. Innova[rie single family housing. lal Building site area :3.500 sq, R.. mmimum, 4.000 sq. ft. average. Ibl Building site coverage : As permitted by required setbacks and pnvate open space. Ic1 Bulldmg setbacks :See building setback diagrams on the following page Cor typical setbacks. Idl Buiding stparatlon :See Building setback diagrams on the following page Cor fyplcal setbacks. (el Bullding height : 35 Ceet maximum. ICJ Building site width and depth : As pertnltted by required setbacks. I61 private open space :300 sq. R. ndrdmum. The above site development standards apply [o proJec[s which are deemed mnovatve, Innovation in single (am0y development means providing creative design solutions which address the entlcal conccros of neighborhood eomDatlbWty, density transition, and design quality. Innovative pioJec[s are characterized by an attractive streetscape which Is not monotonous, nor Is [he street scene dominated by asphalt/concmte, gazages, and cars. [nnovatlve design means finding ettatWe ways to create well-designed space, particularly usable yard space. T N 0 a a t r z a W N = U '7~ ~~ W N ~~~ 7 ' ~~ a3 H ~ v N J ~~ U 1 ~ ! F~ o .. ?S 9 _G ~I~I 4 ~^M _ r- ~, ~ wC3 J t 3~ I i i t w`~Y r a ~~ ~f' JI I ~ I ' r ~~i pip `d r ~6 r C'i_ N~ h1E`a~G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a M N~ N~ ~ ~k `i ~ F .~, r r ~~ ~~ i it y ~. a d 3 ~ i ^ f ~d ~` ~~~ I ti t 3 ~ ,t i ~ ( ~ ! h w e ~ ,~ t 3 ~ L C t e ~r Y St ©~ t ~ ~ W s _ \ ~. ~ i 3 a W 3 s O ® ® W ~ ~ W ayv ~ •i //~~ ` ~ i a ~ sip" ~~ .w ~ ~ ` ~ a: = O 6 eLU~ T Oy^ . (f 1 F ="~N =~v I 6 ~ _ u a " mu~+ 3 ~ K''~d L V OE CJ A Le OVv G 1 O ~U ~(p 1 0 ~ L: o~V(pA L L' _°; ` , m h %OL 'J ~ L ~~3nK rE~. ~ U L t E;,-., ui o r, -i°°~=_ _N 9=U ~ i= ^ Oy9 n . - . ~ ~ JL ii L'J O ~Yr~=C 9 L` __ ,~ s=,~~o(~ _ ~. TL~OC CL ~'~=C 3 ~ VOC~~n^ y y =„_r~ } ; _ ~ _ _ ~~yy yg p_: __lc Y j~ 2~ 1 L" l ~f~_- ^ V \ .L L ~'1~ a`s ~ 04`='=-- i 7 _~Vl _i.'. 3^_ r= %S i.-.. r `y U ~ ~ ` '~r..• RESIDENTLIi, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (continued 5. Mcdlum High Density Residentlai (" MH" land U'se Plan Dcstgnatlon 1 [and dealgg~ated as Medium High Density Residential housing Is mtended for residential devclopmen[ [hat [anges lrom l4 [0 24 dwelling units per adjusted gross acrc. The following regulations are appbcable Cor these areas: a Use Permitted: 1. Multiple-family dwellings including, but not limited to , apartment pro)ec[s, condominium protects, and cooperative apartmcnt protects. 2. AcCCSSOry buildings, structures and uses where related and mcldental to a permitted use. 3. Commumty facWtles, page 241 b Slte Development Standards L Butlding site area : 3 acres mmunum. 2. Building setbacks :See butlding setback diagrams on the Collowmg page for typical setbacks. 3. Budding scparatfon :The standards from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code shall appty. 4. Building height : 40 feet maximum. c Transition of density : The site plan should consider compatibdity with surrounding neighborhood through providing proper translbon of density , partlculazty on Ir1f111 sites adjacent to lower densttes Comparable densities, open space buRer zones . increased setbacks and architectural compatibility are encouraged along common boundaries to provide proper transition of density . Clustering of units can provide large open space areas as a buRcr. d. Ali cluster housing development and multi-family development within the Planned Community area must compty with the Desi~tn Guidelines as oulifncd m [he ResldenUal Section of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. °¢ 9! < -- G 3 ~ • a s 'yam • = E w ~_ ~~ r r r ~ ~ ~ N~ ~~ 6~' o ; 9 ; a ' ^M ~' ~ ~ ~-- -- - i :.. ^Cj a s s ' .7~ I ~ j v 3~ ~ -~ i~ ~~~- ~ C~ a [~~ i ~ Y V~~ ~ ~ = a a I Iii '~-- ~. ~e yr Y U ~ N ~ W '~~3 = 3 C~ h ~ .` U ~~ ~ L s .' ~ M ~ ~ j ~ s a ~ N~ a~ ~k~~ 2 ~ ;~ S d 3 i [ Yt~ s ~ t ~ ~C : I d1 n t w e a r t •1 O t e u a ~~~©, o ~ ~ S i i> s ~ ~ L a 3 a ® ~ yy a w 3 =~ w ~ ~ y~ ~;! °o ~ 9 ~~ o 1 'a ~ 3 i3 C ~~ F i s . i ~^ mu-.r 90VC ~°Ev ~~oa 5~'u~ ~~ 3 ~ ,y°, o ~ ~ .;,~~A r~oHu E"" i! `o~nu~p ;~ ~a~5~ o.~U~p ~ vi j~OL05 y ~nV i CJ~ JE~~S • Eus~~ t` ~mo~a a ~N ~i. a ~~a '~a ~ 7LSC~ V ~ i ~^ n ~ a :~ L C O T ~ L _ j Ct~'T~^~ ~ ~o5~"v ^_~` Q ~~Y~~ -:~- r t~ L a ? =^j=a, s ', ~ o ~v > _ z _~,__ RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1 con[Inucd 6. High Density Residential (" H" land Use Plan Designation) Land designated as High Density Residentlal Is Intended Cor residential development that ranges from 24 to 30 dweilln~( uN[s per ad)usted gross acre. The followmg regulations are applicable for tfiese areas: a Use Perrmlted: t. Multipirfamtly dwellings Including, but not Ifml[ed to , apartment praJ¢cts, condominium proJecls, and cooperative apartment protects. 2. Accessory buildings, atruc[ures and uscs where related and tncldenlal to a permitted use. 3. Community facilltles, page 241 G Stte Development Standards 1. Building site area ; 3 acres mm(mum. 2. Building site coverage : fi0 96 3. Building setbacks ;See buBdtng setback diagrams on the following page for typical sctbacks. 4. Budding scparatlon :The standards from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code shall apply. 5, Budding height : 50 feet maidmum. c, 7tansitlon of density : The site plan should Consider compatlbtllty with surrounding neighborhood through providing proper transition of density , particularly on Irdll] sites adJacent to lower densities . Comparable densities, open space butler zones . increased sdbacks and architectural compallblllty are encouraged along common boundaries to provide proper transition of density . Clustering of units can provWe large open space areas as a buffer. d, All cluster housing development and mult4family development within the Planned Community area must comply with the Des1~n Guidelines as outlined m the Residential Section of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. C T ~ ^ i W ~ - O 1 ~• t N -6_~ - ss s 'a a a s T H yr Y U ~- ~~ W '~F~ = 3 ¢~ N F ~~ J V t a T __~ ~ ~ ~^H ..~~ r _.. .ti 7' t n ~~ I ~ li ~ ~~~r _! ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~a r ~ ; ~ -~ ~'~' I ?~ .~~r ~G~' - - L6 i e s ~ a a ~ ~ r h n r Z '~ a 0 w 9a h ~ f M ; ~ Ee N~ N~ ~~' i ~~ Z i 3 -`~~ a ~ ~ ~ ._ y ~r ~ f ® 3y ~ i~ • 1sWy 1 ^ ~` ~ ~ 1 W i ~~ F i~ J e~ + f ~~ r3 7t~ .e s ~~ ~ W 7~j i '~7 ~ g 3 i j ;3 _ ._ ~ s 0 a = ~ .S~ i i r ( ' ~ ~ } ~ ©~ e ~ 3 J W t ~l i~ W ` N Y_ 8 i ~ _ N L W 3 W 6 i G ~ '~ 9oQ`~ -5 E nu CEO ~ 3u~o A xAa Y uuo~fA . + G u ~ v u `o ]m u`O ou'Sc L ~ U'a ~v v"'o`hE 1 xOL~' °iN C.. • N ~fi~~E °m u ~nO~O u~U~a. ~ QUO 9 .~ AZ NCN 4N ~ qua Ei°UVE S'S jn u`5~r.~ C u ~v L o j 3 ~ ~ N~...NA~ `~' J >~ i o°~x_~>• ~ ~ v ~'y 3 '~oo4a-, c- i Y ~ U N NC ~= `oc n c- a ~ ~ ~~ C 7~ ~ VI VI ~ ~'O L L p~ ~ '9c iti=-L" ~ 3 ~~ 6F r'. .: n.L. U OADINANCE ND. 468 AN ORDINANCE OF `RB; CP1Y COUNCIL OF '41E CITY OF RANCHO (UCIS+pNGA, CAi 7.FORNIh, AMENDING SFX.TION 10.20.020 OF RHE RANCHO C[JCI1t40NNGA CITY CODE RFx,AEt[SING FRP41 FACIE SPEED LTMLTS ON CES2fA'IN CITY 5iREF:f5 A. Recitals. {i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that this City C~wncil may, kry+ ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon arty portion of any street not a state highway. (ii) the City TYaffic Firgineer has mnlucb~ an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucemiorx~a which streets as specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations mncexnirg prima facie speed limits set forth in Part 8, below, are based upon the ergineering and traffic snvey identified in Section A (ii), above. B. ordinance. NGW, T4~StEFORE, the City Cow~cil of the city of Fancho cucarmn5a does hereby ordain as follows: SF.L'1TON 1: Section 10,20.020 herekry is amerxled to the Ram2w Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 -Decrease gf state. law maximwo ~~. It is determined by City Council resolution and upon the Wsis of an engineering an3 traffic inve,tigation that the speed permitted try state law is greater than is reason- able or safe order the corclitions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declazed that the prixaa facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs axe erecta3 giving notice hereof: Declarai Prima Facie Name of Street oY Portion Affeck_ed Sneed Limit (MPEi) 1. Archibald Ave. -Banyan St. to north eid 50 2. Archibald Ave. - 4th St. to Banyan St. 45 3. Arran Rte. -Batter Ave. to Haven Ave. 4S 4. Baker Ave. - eth 5t. to Foothill Blvd. 35 5. Banyan St. from F3ety1 St. to Eordon Ave. 35 6. Eanyan St. frwn west City Limits to Beryl St. 40 7. Vase Line Rd. -west City limits to Carnelian St. 45 8. Base Line Rd. -carnelian St. to HernKx-,a Ave. 40 9. Base Line Rd. -Hermosa Ave, to Spruce Ave. 45 10. Beryl St. -Banyan St. to end 45 11. Beryl St. - 800 N/o Lemon Ave. to Banyan St. 40 12. Canistel Ave. -Wilson Ave. to Antietam Dr.. 15 13. Carnelian St. - Vineyan5 Ave. to ehd 45 IoS OrdirHnCe No. 466 Pi eag 2 Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected bUeed l,;m;t _ (MPH) 14. Center Ave. -Foothill Blvd. to church St. 40 15. orurc3i St. from Archibald Ave. to Elm st. 40 16. 8th St. - Gcwe Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 17. Etiwarda Ave. -Foothill Blvd. to Slmshit Ave. 45 16. Fairmont Dr. -Milliken Ave. to east end 35 19 k2~edricRsdnti7 Ave. -Banyan St. to Seven Pines Dr. 35. 20. Grrove Ave. - 8th St. to Foothill Blvd. 40 21. Haven Ave. - 4th St. to Wilson Ave. 45 22. Hellman Ave. -Foothill Blvd. to Alta Imha Dr. 35 23. Hellman A-de. - 500' N/o Man»nita Dr. to Valley View 40 24. Helhran A.re. - 6th St. to Foothill Blvd. 45 25. Hermosa Ave. -Base Lithe Rd. to Wilsoth Ave. 45 26. Hermosa Ave. -Wilson Ave. to Sun Valley Dr. 40 27. Heznosa Ave. - 8th St. to Base Line Rd. 45 28. Hic~larcl Ave. -Sapphire St, to Carnelian St. 4D 29. Highlahd Ave. -Amethyst St. to Hetlmaa Ave. 35 30. Highland Ave. - Herahosa Ave. to 800 W/o Haven Ave, 45 31. Hillside R1. -Ranch Gate to Amethyst St. 35 32. Hillside Rd. -Amethyst St. to Haven Ave. 40 33. Hillside Rd. -Haven Ave. to Canistel Ave. 35 34. I.enpn Ave. - Archibald Ave. to Haven Ave. 40 35. Lemon Ave. - Saspes St. to Beryl St. 35 36. Man2anita Dr. -Hermosa Ave. to Haven Ave. 35 37. Mountain View Gr. - sPrvice Ave. to Milliken Ave. 40 38. 9th St. -Balser Ave. to Archibald Ave. 40 39. Red Hill CWrhty Club Dr. -Foothill Blvd. to Alta Cuesta 35 40. Rochester Ave. -Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 40 41. San Bernardino Rd. fran Vineyard Ave. to Archibald Ave. 35 42. Sapphire St. - Batryan St. to erd 45 43. Sapphire St. - 19th St, to L9tpn Ave. 40 44. 7th St. -Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave. 45 45. Spruce AVe. -Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 40 46. 'farm Vista Parkway -Church St. to Belpire P1. 40 47. Victoria St. -Archibald Ave. to nam7na Ave. 35 48. Victoria St. - Etiwarda Ave. to Rt. 15 40 49. Victoria St. - Naven Ave. to Mendocino P1. 40 50. Victoria Park In. -Fairmont Way to Base Line Rd. 35 51. Victoria Wi ru3roWS Ipop (not?h & south) 35 52. Vineyard Ave. -Church St, to Base Line Id9. 40 53. Vineyard Ave. - 8th St. to Carnelian Ave. 45 54. Vintage Dr. -Milliken Ave. to east end 35 55. Whittram Ave. - Etiwarda Ave. to east City limits 40 56. Wilson Ave. T+ltethyst Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 57. Wilson Ave. -Haven Ave. to 200' east of Canistel Ave. 40 (Ord. 169 section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Fathcho Cucamonga 5/82 124 (i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hear and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe ; and ~ _I [Irt3i nines No. 468 Page 3 (ii) 'lhe miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds x3iic3i are mgt appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement o£ traffic and are speed limits whid~ are reasonable and safe on said ~**~*~ or portions thermf~ atd (iii) the miles per has stated are hereby declared to he the prima facie spaced limits a~ said streets; atd (iv) The 't'raffic ttgineer is herelry authorized and du'ected t~ install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. sECTtGN z: 'the city clerk shall certify to the passage o£ this Orriirance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. SN7L'LZON 3: 'the Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the inland Vallev Daily bulletin, a newspaper of gerrs~al circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, atxl circulated in the city of P~vxho CUCamoiga. 110 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director BY: Kathy Sorensen, CLP, Recreation Superintendent SUBJECT: GRIPFIT$ COST RECOVERY STODY RECON!ffi7D]~TION The Park and Recreation Commission recommends to City Council the attached coat recovery program for Community Services. BACKGROUND In the 1989/90 fiscal yenr, the City entered into an agreement with Griffith and Associates for a citywide cost recovery study and aodel in compliance with State law. This study was to review all aspects oP city activities and determine areas and percentages of coat recovery for each activity. Depending on the activity, percentages would range from 03 to 1002. Total costa for each activity includes direct and indirect department coats, as well as the full distribution of city support services to provide the service. Griffith then put together, in matrix form, all those services (see Attachment I for Community Services programs and activities), and matched these services with any current revenue received for those activities. (Sae Attachment II.) From these two documents, Griffith provided the City with options for cost recovery. This study went before the City Council on April 11, 1991, and all items were passed except as they related to Community Services. That department was held for further review. A subcommittee was formed of two councllmembers (BUquet/Williams), two commissioners (Mitchell/Whitehead), and city staff (Schultz/Hart/Sorensen). CITY COUNCIL MEETING GRIFFITH COST RECOVERY STUDY November 20, 1991 Page 2 Since that time, the subcommittee has met numaroua times to refine, define and review the study. Through these meetings, a general program and philosophy were developed and finalized for public presentation. (See Attachment III.) Prior to the Park and Recreation Commission public hearing on September 19, 1991, staff and subcommittee commissioners have sought and heard input from various organizations, groups and users of the Community Services Department. Fliers and copies of the Cost Recovery Study have been posted at the community centers, library and civic center. Staff has contacted and given information to equestrian groups, performing groups, sports organizations, and local senior citizens. At the Commission Public Hearing, the recommendations of the subcommittee were approved with the following changes. (See Attachment IV.) • Senior Citizen programs were moved to the "Public" category of the coat recovery philosophy. • The Eq,..,o Ltian section received a separate recommendation for staff to formulate a policy and procedure for the use of the facility and establish corresponding fees. This policy is scheduled for commission discussion in the 1st quarter of 1992. • Addition of an additional "seasonal" category under the Field Rental - City, Which could primarily benefit local sports organizations. The seasonal Pee would be $175 for Group 2 and $200 for Group 3 per field used. • snack bar fees for trailers in the park was changed to a $300 seasonal fee. • The non-resident fee wns raised to $5.00 per participant. It should be emphasized that whether or not a city ie proposing to change its policies regarding cost recovery, it is still required to conduct a coat allocution and user fee analysis. ~11 CITY COUNCIL MEETING GRIFFITH COST RECOVERY STUDY November 20, 1991 Page 3 In addition, as part of the poet proposition 13 mandates, Proposition 4 Was passed by the voters which requires that cities and counties conduct business in the most cost effective manner. Proposition 4 requires that all coats by government be "reasonably borne" by those who are receiving the direct service. The most logical method to determine if the costs of services being provided are reasonably borne by those receiving the service is to conduct veer fee and cost allocation studies. To conform with the voters mandate, the City commissioned the study. other jurisdictions have done the same. ANALYSIS The following quickly outlines each area mentioned in the Commission's recommendation. Philoeop_hy: It is strongly believed that the philosophy of e cost continuum for coat recovery be the cornerstone of any cost recovery study. Therefore, the subcommittee hoe chosen to develop and define the following four areas for cost recovery pricing decieiona. Public: No price charged except where a fee can be obtained, i.e., carnival games, pony rides, etc. Merit Variable: Consumable costs recovered, plus percentage of administration coats. Merit Partial: Consumable costa plus a percentage of direct or indirect coats. Private: All costs for direct and inflirect. This philosophy continuum was used to slot the various activities provided by Community Services. Without the continuum, the City cannot recover costs in an equitable manner. (Pages 4 - e) Specific Charnel for Cost Recovarv: Ae shown in the cost recovery handbook, various charges are proposed (Attachment IZI). Included are group claseiflcations which ware approved on February 1, 1939 by City Council. (For Matrix see Attachment IV.) 1~1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING GRIFFITH COST RECOVERY STUDY November 20, 1991 Page 4 City-sponsored Programs: The following activities and programs are currently classified as Merit Variable Programs and, according to the philosophy, must cover consumable costs of the programs, plus 16E of the costa to produce the activity or program: (Page 11) Teen Programs Youth Programs Youth Sport Programs These activities are additionally classified ae Public and will be supported by city revenues. No fees or cost recovery will be charged except where special use exists. (Pegs 11) Youth Events Citywide Events Senior Events i Progress Muman services Volunteer Ftograme Field Lights: Coate for field light use are based on actual energy consumption by the lights. Ho additional costa are included for maters, security lighting, etc. for groups 1, 2 and 3. (Page 11) Classes i Norkahops: Since fifty percent oY the City~s classes are far below market standard for the area, it is recommended that fees be increased over the next three years to reach market level at fiscal year 93/94. This would mean a 25; increase in all affected classes fiscal year 91/92 and subsequent increases to reach the market standard of surrounding city recreation classes by 93/94. No more than e 25$ increase could be instituted each year to reach market. (Pages li i 12) Facility Rentals: Cost recovery would include the following: (Page 12) • Kitchen usage. • Use of equipment, such as audio visual, coffee service at market rates consistent with surrounding cities. • Use of public facilities for private fund raisers operated in the facilities. "`L CITY COUNCIL MEETING GRIFFITH COST RECOVERY STUDY November 20, 1991 Page 5 Day Camps i Athletic camps: Organizations would be charged a fee to hold day camps or athletic camps on city property. There would also be a non-refundable deposit to hold a reservation for each week of use. Charge also establishes the requirement of a complete financial breakdown of the activity prior to approval of the application. (Page 12) Playschool: No increase in charges currently required. (Page 12) Adult Sports - City-sponsored: All consumable costs are to ba paid by the leagues, plus a 168 coat recovery of direct and indirect costs. (Page 13) Youth Sports - Ciiy-sponsored: All consumed costa, plus e 168 cost recovery fee. (Page 11) field Rental - City: Established charges for groups, organizations or individuals who desire to reserve a city field. Local youth and adult orgy. i'zations would be charged either a seasonal, weekly or hourly rate for use, whichever is lower. (Page 13) Field Rental - Schools: This ie a cost per permit to act on behalf of the group as a booking agent to minimize conflicts and submit a request for use on their behalf. Groups or individuals would still be responsible for filling out all final paperwork as required by the school district. (Page 13) Tripe ~n Tours: Charge for consumable coats plus recovery costa of 108 or 158 depending on whether the trip ie cosponsored with another public agency. (Page 13) Community Amphitheater: Established hourly rental oP the amphitheater and sound monitor coats. (Page 13) Tennis: will rise gradually to keep pace with market of surrounding city classes, tovrnamenta and leagues. (Page 13) Tournaments: Establishes a $50 non-refundable deposit to hold fields. Establishes par field per day charges for group and individuals. (Page 13) Aquatics: No changes anticipated because class charge is currently at market. Fees will adjust to keep pace with consumable costs and local market area. (Page 13) l~~ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING GRIFFITH COST RECOVERY STUDY November 20, 1991 Page 6 Squeetrian Canter: Staff has been asked to develop a separate policy and procedure regarding the use and charges of the Equestrian Center. Anticipated approval winter 1992. (Page 14) Pazk and Picnic Reservation Permits: Establishes a per shelter fee for reservation of picnic shelters posted as reservable via the picnic reservation policy. (Page la) Snack Bar: Provides for a seasonal charge for the use of snack bars at the Red Hill and Heritage Athletic Fields. The Equestrian Center will ba part of a separate, future report for other nonprofit users to bring a concession trailer into the park to sell where no current snack bare exist. Does not apply to smaller table and choir snack bare. (Page 14) Non-Resident Charge: Established a non-resident charge which is applied to each individual for each class, team and seasons they participate. TAess somas would be used to support the city's scholarship fund. only city programs will collect fee. (Page 14) Attached for your review is a final matrix showing the total breakdown at the Griffith Study versus the Commission's recommendation. (Attachment IV.) The cost recovery subcommittee is continuing to meet, focusing on different options and alternatives that include: adopting the attached resolution; tiering coat recoverable items; or maintain statue quo. Further communication to the Council will be forthcoming on options/alternatives for coat recovery. Please note that any adjustment adopted will be effective immediately unless otherwise directed by City Council. Respectfully submitted, / ~ , i Jo~/SChultz, C Cod(munity se ,i a Director JS/K3/kls Attachments ~~~ r_ y 9 h b~' y m o` en - °o °a Sib °o °0 8:8 U. »i N T i ~" »" I ' W I~86S8818888SIS8885185888'~5888885888~~181 ~ Wi X88° _»A^i°e S'S e~S$.ISSSS51«I ~» ~ »» ~ ~~" '" I»5~» ~ ~I 1~ ~~ 'I8 ~° =889- o°I°o 588~i$885818888818 ' W ai ~N^BnSI"-_ :.,8 :.__°'~:a9»Igo°"R.°.IS r.R88`SI ~ ` ~ N I" " ~" » i I " "~" ~~ ~'8R 91: 8b°°888 8888188885;81 ~~~Ioi~. ~~i•°°•m59 :88°O1= » 1158°o»8'IS998888S9R1°. III '~I~ o~~~ ~^.°-.58„"In' ~01~8 ~--'0l~^»~'. IG:-nRa~SR~'el ~ ni a ~ ~I S `z i S^. FIRU889^ :SRI°58881.°,°S8S1895°°~S' vi°^e RIN.' 5.x8R=8SA:te ^~8 S:.eo~'.I I« ..» 8888588888888:8888:18 8 8 8 818 8 8 5 8181 8" -» - ~ »d35~88SAlAS&3.41SI -pnoooo _ ~eoe_ ~~ I °I"~ °~°- -a~ l ~ I ° i W" 'i F0 ' W Sp~Z = Fy 9'iU ~~ W¢ WI ~ Oj Wj W i2 ¢ OJ2jWmN prmj- i02 ii¢F Om s 060 UWR U' r(]W WNILLY~O K~~~jII~2 <~ ~U a{ W ~Ng3U W.Wj 01~22Z WmW3 W1TN ~Y~aIS W2~Q 4$ ~ y Z U I ~ n 3 ~:~ 6¢ N Y Y` Q T' 2 6< W J C~ 6 U WT¢<~r7 ~OC~'S 2333y2> » J Y W v,<SF<IiYi 0 OID~~'<n~ w0 0~~ S~~- pWU on >u TI<W a z~~~T 0<w SOiaauO ll l >~ ATTACt;MENT I F r H H 6 a O W h 0 U a F O F 1 Cl ' C J i ;, n E to ~ o ~ `~ N 4 m 4 ', yi a ATTACHMENT IL w 31 ~ ' z ~ I S '9 C ~ i ~ ~ S y~ oSo 18» °'~„°8~~°.~'18&8 »IR$e~$I$8SR31$I _ '. _ s + ^ W f i $ o e ¢ ~ it % 'eR^e~»~Ir ~", R~i~r8o :8: nro. 08131 3 ~ S y y R o° • N ° n m i h h ~ ~ N iww n~w~w «ti~ O I l ~, i, w i u t n - ~~ ~ i '8' h~ Ala _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ < y ~i iwN MA » n h www i w Nwiyi w N > gI i i T ~ ~ 1 a I' '. 08~° R~IE'~~R «5~~~°»g ~~l~ E'~ 8~81 8 8 8 8 ~ , « I . . M r' w '~ w ° V ~ ° ~ I M z ~ l ~ a s ~ „8°nlsarF~ ~-'.'.836 ~ wl ~ ° i b w W 4i = i~ W i 5 z ul i88oo~1~».°.«o'e ».°.S $I 883 :_ « 1 SS88:'~88$»81583831 31 ~R &I i I m zp w h ~ N< F p m 02n~V ON m Rz ~m F W ~ <~ O W> Y m m [~ j jm NO 3~ I W F U 2 <'C H U b l 4 0p O~m ~~T p ~ Wi U6 4 rW-:w ill < ~ Y R ~~zo ml~zwza Q yjj Q y I~Wwmim mb4~~m Y ¢im ~yoi ~I~i~o~ ILL iwil ai ;~~ oa9¢ ~hm ~ ~~~zai»?WI~<~~ = ~ g~~ I ¢ W< G U hQ w i u~F< h~YUY 4 ~WOmO a mZ0N Yf <W Ii IOS 44U G( I,.°n<al en°sei =73=1 i =:°3'«.°. .^V«33A388 IC,~ 111 8 $ ° » E 0 F U 20 4 W Z ATTACHPffiNT III ^„rc/ Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department COST RECOVERY OF PARK AND RECREATION SERVICES AND PROGRAMS ~~ ~ ~-~ 3 Aevelomina a Commreheneive Guides to Pricing Decisions Although the issue of establishing a price seems, at first glance, a simple matter, all prices charged in public agencies have economic, political, and social implications. Charging for services is the most obvious way for an agency to recover some or all of its cost of providing a service. Charges can also fulfill a number oP policy functions in an agency beyond the recovery of costs. Howard and Crompton (1980) have identified six objectives of pricing, including the efficient use of all financial resources, fairness or equitableneae, providing maximal opportunity of participation, rationing, developing positive user attitudes, and commercial sector encouragement. Because charging for services accomplishes more than cost recovery, a policy regarding pricing services needs to be developed. The issue is not one of deciding whether or not to charge; to have a comprehensive community recreation system, fees and charges must be implemented to eupplesant tax-generated revenue. Rather, the issue is one of determining how to use fees fairly to recover the coats of providing service and how to use tax revenue to provide aubaiflized aervicea. A philosophy regarding fees and charges should provide a base for differentiating services on the beefs of who benefits and who should pay for the service. Economists have differentiated goods in the economy in this manner and have designated three different types of goods: public, merit, and private (Howard and Crompton 1980). Programs offered by an agency can also be put into these three categories. Adopting a philosophy that acknowledges these three levels of good shifts the social welfare philosophy of the public recreation agency away from the notion that all services are of equal value and should be provided for everyone. This egalitarian philosophy is replaced with one that provides a basis for sorting out costa and benefits derived from various program aervicea and provides a rationale for who should pay. In this conceptualization, each type of program has specific characteristics that imply who should pay for it. To develop a comprehensive fee and charge policy, agencies need to establish three categories for pricing programs that parallel these three types of economic good, that is, public, merit, and private programs. Each cetagory has features that distinguish it from the other categorise. These features are outlined below. IIIZ y Public Programs Public programs are the basic programs supported totally by tax dollars and are available to patrons free of charge. Theoretically, these programs are equally available to all. However, it is operationally not possible to make services equally available. For example, a park cannot be placed equidistant from all patrons. operationally, a public program Ss beneficial to all, even though only some will actually use the program. Its provision is clearly in the "public interest" (Friedmann 1973). Since the public at large derives benefit from these programs, it is assumed that their cost will be paid through public financing. Public programs, then, are available with no fee to users--they era completely subsidized services. Ideally, the public recreation movement would like all services to be in this category. However, the diverse demands for programs almost always exceed a community's ability to totally pay for them. It should be the goal of public agencies to use public tax dollars to provide a core set of free recreation programs for all citizens. Usually public programa include provision for park areas or facilities, low organization events such as drop-in activities, special events, single-time block instructional workshops, and the like. Public programs usually do not require specialized leadership, the use of expensive equipment or facilities, and other high-cost components. What is to be included in this category varies Prom community to community, depending on the resources available and the community~s willingness to support public recreation. Merit programa Merit programs are partly subsidized with tax dollars, but also have user fees attached to help recover soma of their production costs. The benefits derived from merit programs can be partly attributed to the public interest and private individual gain. For example, one could argue that a summer recreation program directly benefits each child who participates and also to some extent the public at large. Partitioning out the proportion of individual and private benefits accrued from merit goods Se obviously problematic. However, the key element of the "merit good" concept Ss that some benefit accrues to both public and private interests. Thus, it is assumed that these goods will be jointly paid for with both individual and public Panda. Operationally, merit programa are services that are partly subsidized with public tax dollars. 1115 6 Private Programs Private programs are paid for entirely by the participants. It is assumed that the benefit Prom private goods or private programs is received exclusively by the individuals using the program--not by the general public. In a Pree society, people may use their own personal resources to purchase any goods or services they believe will benefit them, including recreation services. Since the decisions are private and the benefit derived is private, it is assumed that the individual will pay the full coat of acquiring these services. Collectively, it is through the public and merit programs that the social welfare function of a community recreation system is fulfilled. public programs are the basic free system--they are completely subsidized, Pree services. Merit programs era partly subsidized services. In allocating resources to merit programs, the agency is further defining who it wants to subsidize with tax dollars and other nonuaer- sourcas of revenue. It is important to recognize that, with limited resources, an agency probably cannot have all the public and merit programs for which demand can be documented. Decisions for allocating resources between these two types of services are policy-level decisions that should be made by a policy-level board. At the local level, developing policies to implement the proposed social welfare function of local recreation systems requires a serious review of the agency~a facilities, services, and functions. The overall goal of policy development should be to preserve the public recreation system, first by identifying the goods offered. Those that are truly public should be funded totally through public financing. The second goal ie to identify the private goods being offered and to make certain Lhat they are not actually merit goods receiving inappropriate public subsidy. Tha final goal is to further develop the social welfare function of public recreation. This can be done by giving clearer direction to the subsidization of merit goods so that the community~s social welfare desires are realized. imple- menting these policies will require an accounting methodology and budgeting procedure that proviflea the data needed to allow congruence between fiscal practice and policy. 111 IL 6 References Friedmann, J. 1973. The Public Interest and Community Pnrtlcipation: Toward a Reconstruction of Public Philosophy. Journal of the American Institutes oP Planners 39(1), 2-12. Wicks, H. 1986, October. The Equitable Allocation of Publicly Provided Recreation and Park Services: Citizens' Perceptions of Equity. Paper presented at the 1986 Leisure Research Symposium, Anaheim, CA. Additional Readings Crompton, J.L. 1982. Psychological Oimaneions of Pricing Leisure Services. Recreation Research Review 9(3), 12- 20. Crompton, J.L. 1984. How to Establish a Prise far Park and Recreation Services. Trends 21(4), 12-21. 111 ~-. ~ A well-known author on this subject is John Crompton and in his literature he uses the following visual aid in viewing a cost recovery continuum. Program or Service Continuum for Cost Recovery Public Mer it Pri usts l y No Price Variable Partial Full Cost Charged Cost Pricing overhead Recovery Pricing Pricing By using this continuum for cost recovery pricing, a value is placed, as mentioned in the above article, as well as dividing up the merit category into two additional areas for further breakdown. staff suggests that the difference between the varvlnc and gartial could be defined as follows: Variable Coat Pricing: Consumable coats recovered only, i.e., umpires, balls, refreshments, scorekeepers or time specific activities such ae a dance; plus city~s administration percentage and liability percentage. Partial Warhead Pricing: Consumable costs plus a percentage of direct costs as determined by the City Council; plus City's administration percentage and liability percentage. Public: No charge for general public good items; however, some areas where varying coats can ba recovered, staff should do eo, (i. e., 4th of July music, walking through the park and general interaction with other entertainment !e provided at no charge.) However, carnival games, balloon rides, pony rides can have fees attached. Private: All costs consumablee, direct and indirect, should be charged for use or participation. In light of these findings, staff has made a preliminary list of those items identified by Griffith and placed them in the above categories. ~.- 11~ M S PUBLIC BRIT PRZVATE Varvinc Pa ial #& Youth Events #a City sponsored #1 & #3 Classes #2 Facility #9 Citywide Events Teen Programs Rental #17 Human Services #19 Senior Events #5 City spon- #2 Community #14 Trips 'n #26 Grapevine sored Day Camps Facility Rental Tours #27 Volunteer Prog. #2a Commissions #10 City spon- #5 Day Camps #15 Park and #29 Park Develop. sored Youth Sports outside organ. park resarv. #30 Community Service #18 City sponsored Some city-spon- #6 & 7 #16 Snack Sr. Programs sored events Playechool Har #25 field light #il Adult #12 Field (staff & acutal Softball Rental-City coat of electricity) #12 Field #13 Field Rental-City Rental-School #13 Field Rental-School #20 Community Amphitheater #21 Tennis #22 City & Community Tournaments #23 Aquatics #24 Community Equestrian 11\ N 9 Group I: community Services Department sponsored event; City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and co-sponsored events; and governmental agencies serving Rancho Cucamonga residents. Group Z: Resident not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations whose management ie not paid and any organization sponsoring a public forum or candidate's night. Group 3: Resident not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations whose management is paid. Group 6: Resident private party activity, resident employee organizations, resident political candidate use for Lund raisers; resident college organizations and committees; work parties and social events. Group 5: Resident commercial, business, profit-making and regligioua organizations, non-resident not-for-profit, civic and social organizations; non-resiflent colleges, their organizations and committees; non-resident private party activity and non-resident employee associations. Grovp 6: Non-resident commercial, business, profit-making and religious organizations. In order to qualify as a nonprofit user, the organizatlon must meet all the following criteria: A. Tha organization must be registered as a not-for- profit corporation with the State of California, or if not registered with the State, must have a constitution, bylaws or mission statement which clearly state the objectives of the organization are on a nonprofit, noncommercial nature. S. The organization must be comprised of volunteers, 51$ oP which must be Rancho Cucamonga residents. C. The organization must submit the following: • If incorporated, submit State Incorporation papers and bylaws; if not incorporated, aubmlt constitution and bylaws or mission statement. • A current financial statement. • A roster of current membership for verifying item "8." D. For the organization's beet interest, please submit the following: Roster of officers. List of authorized reservers for your organization. 111 ~ ~o Public: The following activities are currently classified as Public Programs antl will be open to the general public. Generally there will be no charge forthese activHies except where specific use creates the ability to charge. F~camples are: ramival games, pony rides or similar activdies where a ticket for participation can be obtained at a small charge. Vouth Events Cily Wde Special Evems Senior Programs & Events Human Services Volunteer Programs Merit: Variable Cost: The following activities and programs are currently classified as Merit Variable Cost Programs and will require that revenue be generated through charges to cover the consumable costs of the programs, including the Ctyys charge for administration and liability. Examples of consumable costs are: officials, balls, refreshmems, craft supplies, instructors. City Sponsored Teen, Day Camp, Vouth SpoR Programs Athletic Field Lighting field Li hts: ~ The City will charge to recover costs for electrical use of lights as well as for use of stall to tum on and off lights as neces- sary. A breakdown of how this tae antl the field rental fee impacts youth sports see Adachmem B t. These charges will be as folows: Field Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 8 90' BalHield $16.08 $16,08 $16.08 $17.00 $20.00 $25.00 60'Dallfieltl $12.21 $12.21 $12.27 $13.00 $16.00 $21.00 Soccer Field $ 8.34 $ 8.34 $ 8.34 $ 9.00 $12.00 $17.00 Tennis Courts $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 Equestrian Rings $ 2.13 $ 2,13 $ 2.13 $ 3.00 $ 6.00 $11.00 Staff Fee: None None None $ 6.25 $ 7.50 $ 7.50 (Keys will be given to representatives of Group 1 - 3) Merit: Partial Overhead Cost: The following activities and programs are curremly classified as Merit Partial Overhead Programs and will require that revenue be generated through charges to cover the consumable costs of the programs, including the C%y s aministration and liability charge plus a percentage of direct staff costs as tletennined by the Cdy Council. lasses : Currenity 60 % of the city's classes are far below market standard for the area. Therefore a 25 % increase is recom~ merWetl for fiscal year 97/92, a 25% increase in 92/93 and 93/94 increases continue until public market rate is reached with no more than a 25 % increase annually. An example of how this would impact classes is as follows: (See Atlach- menl "C" for addRional classes.) Aerobics Market Rate: $30 - $40 for 1 day a week for 10 weeks RC Current. $30 for 2 days a week for 10 weeks 81/92: $3750 " 92/93: $43.12 " 93/94: $48.29 " I1 ~ r~ ~~ orkshops: Workshops and seminars comprise 33°/ of class revenue and to keep wtth market rt is recommended that a 10 % in- crease for fiscal 91192 be implemented with additional increases the tolbwing Iwo years not to exceed 25 % annually. An example of how this would impact classes is as follows: Craft Workshop Market Rate: $15 - $20 a day RC Current: $12 aday 91192: $13.20 a tlay 92193: $13.86 a day 93194: $14.55 a day acilRy Rentals: Current fees in this area would stay basically the same except where new costs should be rewveretl such as for equip- ment rental or in areas which the current tee schedule tloes not adtlress, The charges!or week day antl saturtlay use as lolbws'. (Sunday and Holiday use will be charged the 5 p.m. to 8 a.m rate.) (Building Rentals Houdy Charge Room Size Time Group 1 Group 2 Small Bam-Spm None $3.75 Small Spm-Bam None $7.50 Large Bam-Spm None $5.00 Large Spm-Bam None $10.00 Kitchen Hourly Charge: Small None $2.00 large None $5.00 Other Charges: Group 3 Group 4 $7.50 $15.00 $12,D0 $25.00 $10.00 $25.00 $15.00 $35.00 $ 2.00 $ 3.06 $ 5.00 $ 7.00 Group 5 Group 6 $15.00 $30,00 $25.00 $50.00 $25.00 $50.00 $35.00 $70.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $10.00 $10.00 The city reserves the right to charge for the amoritization of equipment used for rental of facilities. Such equipment shall include audiolvisual equipment, co0ee service equipment. The cAy shall also charge up to 10 % of the gross revenues for fundraisers operated in the facility plus the rental charge, This applies to all group classiticalbns. Additional staff, if requiretl by the City, would be billed at $ 8.25 par hour. Day Camo and Athletic Camos'. Non-City sponsored day camps or athletic camps will 6e charged the Cdy Field Rental Rate per field used or the Park and Picnic Reservation Permit fee, to mn programs on city properly. Also a $25.00 non-refundable depos4 wilt be paid to hold each week of the camp, Which applies towartl total fees. FinalPayment will be tlue when camp rosters are finalized. The City requires a complete cost breakdown of the proposed program with the request to holtl a Oay or Athletic Camp and this breakdown will be used to help determine the approval of the request. ~Iayschool'. This program has been restructured and current tees cover the requirement of the Panical Overhead Cost criteria. Any adlustmenl of tees would not occur again until the 92193 budge) review process, 11~ Q ~z duA Sports - Cily Sponsored: All consumable costs plus a percentage of city direct costs will be charged. See Attachment A for breakdown of Adult Softball example. field Rentals - C This charge would be paid by all local sports organizations (youth and adult) to use city fields, as well as picnickers. A breakdown of how this fee and the light cost receovery fee impacts youth sports see Attachment B 2. Use Group 1 Group2 Group3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Seasonal None $175.00 $200.00 N/A N/A N/A Weekly None $20.00 $30.00 N/A N/A N/A Hourly None $2.00 $3,00 $5.00 $10,00 $10.00 field Use -Schools; ~ This is a recovery of cost for tlired city time and will be chargetl as a city administration cost only . The charge woultl be a flat fee, per field or per area 0 arwther group does not share the same space; per season requested on local school sties. Usage Groupl Group2 Group3 Group4-6 Seasonal None $30.00 $35.00 N/A rips and Tours: Charges for this program will include wnsumable costs and partial direct staff costs. ommundy Amphitheater: I The following charges outline the twurty cost to reM the amphitheater and separates the sound montoring costs out as some users do not require sound monitoring. The first hour of monitoring is included in the stage rental for groups 2 and 3. Use Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Stage None $25.00 $40.00 $72.00 $72.00 $72,00 Sound Monitor None $10.00 $70.00 $28.75 $26.75 $35.00 ennis: Charges will keep pace with current market in area. Tennis court usage is also covered by a separate policy. oumaments: Tournaments played in the City will be required to pay the city for use of their fields, The City reserves the right to charge youth groups the fieltl rental fee. A $50.00 non-refundable deposit is required to hold fields which will apply to final field rental totals. The City reserves the right to charge a stall lee based on the highest step of Recreation Assistant to over- see the tournament if requested by the Director of the Community Services Depanmem. It will also be the responsibilAy of the requester to meet all liability issues raised by Risk Management regarding facility usage or additional equipment needed to hold the tournamem. The cost of this additional equipment will be the responsibility of the user. Use Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group e Per Day None $20 $30 $70.00 $70.00 $125.00 quatics_ Chnrge5 for this program will stay at market as they currently do. 111 ~ /3 ages for this area will be as folbws i Group 1 Group 2 se Shows None Youth - $50.00 snack bar) Adult - $100.00 om Remal See Small Room Rate '.h Arena None Youth $10.00 its separate) Aduk - $25,00 en Public Use None $6.00 th Ights) Group3 Group4-6 Youth - $50.00 N/A AduN-$100.00 N/A Youth $15.00 WA Adult - $30.00 WA $s.oo $s.oo ark and Picnic Reservation Permits: This charge should be per picnic shelter rat per perms. This provides a "use by propod'an"fee. Use one shelter at Red Hill for $25, three for $75. Use Group t Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group e Oay /Portion of a day None $10.00 $15.00 $25.00 $35,00 $50.00 nack Bar: The city owns three snack bars boated in city parks. The charge for use would inGude a re-keying cost at the end of use as well as a policy specifically written for snaGC bar use. Use Group 7 Group z Group 3 - 6 Seasonal None $450.00 N/A Other rion-profit groups bringing in snack bars (i.e. trailers) would be charged a flat $300 seasonal lee for a pennd except to participate in city sponsored events . Non-Resident Charge; The city will assess a $5.00 charge for each non-resident, each class, each team, each season to participate in city spon- sored classes or activities to support the city scholarship fund and is payable at the time of registration. ~~l S ~y ATTACHMENT A ADULT SOFTBALL WITH LIGHTS 6 Teams per Team per player (13 average) player per 9~ Officials 34 games @ $17. per game 578.00 96.33 7.41 .67 SCMAF Registration 6 x $6.00 36.00 6.00 .46 .04 Awards 280.00 46.66 3.58 .32 Softballs 34 x $4.25 144.50 24.08 1.85 .16 Chalk - $11.25 11.25 1.87 .14 .01 Scorekeepter 34 games x $6.75 229.50 38.25 2.94 .26 Fieltl Prep 1,25 hrs x 12 wks x $6.0 90.00 15.00 1.15 .10 Field Supervison 4 hrs x $6.00 24.00 4.00 .30 .03 Lights 51 hrs x 12.21 622.71 103.78 7.98 .72 Miscellaneous $30.00 30.00 5.00 .38 .03 Ciiy Liability 1 ~ 20.46 3.41 .27 .03 City Atlministration 1 0/ 306.90 51.15 3.94 .38 Totals 2373.32 395.53 30.40 2.73 IIIT 15 LIGHT USAGE ExAMPLE ATTACHMENT D 1 Using lighted Pield until 10:00 p.m. (maximum use) Day Light Savings Time (April thru October) Charge calculated from 7:30 - 10:00 p.m. Average Weekly Cost, 5 days use, per field: 60' Ballfield $152.62 90' Hallfield = $201.00 Soccer Field $104.25 Pacific Standard Time (November thru March) Charge calculated Prom 5:00 - 10:00 p.m. Average Weekly cost, 5 days use, per Yield: 60' Ballfield = $305.25 90' Ballfield ~ $402.00 Soccer Field $203.50 Example: Effects oP Sports Groups Primiary Season (Maximum Use): Pields Grouv 60 90 Soccer SDST/Nke SP3T/Wks TOTAL AYSO 4 104.25/8 208.50/12 13,344.00 CYSA 2 104.25/8 208.50/16 8,340.00 Alta Loma L.L. 2 152.62/14 305.25/8 9,157.36 Alta Loma L.L. 1 201.00/14 402.00/8 6,030.00 Citrus L.L. 1 152.62/14 305.25/8 4,578.68 Citrus L.L. 1 201.00/14 402.00/8 6,030.00 Rancho L.L. 1 91.57/14 183.15/8 2,747.18 Adult Softball 2 152.62/24 305.25/16 17,093.76 Adult Softball 1 61.04/24 122.10/16 3.418.56 Grand Total - Maximum Uae $70,739.54 Current City Electrical Bill for Fields 88.786.88 Difference $18,047.34 SDST ~ coat Por weekly use of Pielde on Day Light Savings Time $PST a Coet for weekly use of fields on Pacific Standard Time 11 ~ ~ /6 ATTAGHI3ENT B 2 Impact oP Griffith Study Fees as of Public Hearing on September 19, 1991 Park and Recreation Commission (1991 Field Reouest-combined seasons) Orcanization Old New Difference Womens Soccer $ 184.00 $ 184.00 $ 0 Mens S.H. Soccer 608.00 205.00 403.00 AYSO - August-January x,610. 00 1,965.00 3,625.00 R/C Spirit Fastpitch 1,552.00 525.00 1,027.00 Miss Softball 330.00 330.00 0 Rancho Little League 2,490.00 1,025.00 1,465.00 Alta Loma Little League 2,040.00 1,085.00 955.00 Fep Warner 506.00 506.00 0 C1 -rus Little League 1,840.00 940.00 900.00 Pcny/Colt 442.00 442.00 0 C'!SA 1,810.00 790.00 1,020.00 R/C Legion 78.00 78.00 0 ACS T-Ball 700.00 450.00 250.00 ACS Softball 270.00 270.00 0 Deer Canyon Little Leaque 570.00 325.00 245.00 Vineyard Little League 2.150.00 965.00 1.185.00 $21,180.00 $10,085.00 $10,705.00 l~lV /7 Sample of Classes Effected: Attachment C Market Rate is based on average prices for same class in surrounding cities such as Ontario, Corona, Rialto and Fontana. Prices will be rounded up to the nearest dollar. Acting Market Rate $ 40.00 10 Weeks R/C Current $ 15.00 10 Weeks 91/92 $ 18.75 25% increase 92/93 $ 23.44 25% increase 93/94 $ 29.30 22% increase Gymnastics Market Rate $ 35.00 10 Weeks R/C Current $25.00 10 Weeks 91/92 $31.25 25% increase 92/93 $35.93 15% increase 93/94 Keep pace with market Karate Market Rate $35.00 10 Weeks R/C Current $ 15.00 10 Weeks 91/92 $ 18.75 25% increase 92/93 $ 23.44 25 % increase 93/94 $ 26.30 25% increase Adult Dance (Ballroom & Country Western) Market Rate $ 35.00 10 Weeks R/C/ Current $ 15.00 10 Weeks 91/92 $ 18.75 25% increase 92193 $ 23.44 25% increase 93/94 $ 29.30 25% increase Tennis Classes Market Rate R/C/ Rate 91/92 92/93 93/94 $ A0.00 9 Weeks $ 20.25 9 Weeks $ 25.31 25% increase $ 31.64 25% increase $ 39.55 25% increase W /S o ~ " _ a s _ _ _ ' _ 2 ~ _ _ _ 8 m E E E E o E E 'E L E E E E E E E~~E o o f E ~~ E E E [ E 8 E 8 ~ E 8 E 8 o „ E E E 8 E ~ m H }j ` u ~ n o m & 8 9 o Ia ¢ a: ^ f m m m~ a r m m m a gw q ~ m m I E N _ q E E G NN' N - o E N E ~i m'E Yi E N E N F d N ~E I ~ a E N E N E F, ~~ o g N $ B $ . N o . I ~ g ` o ;q 6 O M x S ~B E ( ` f b(S~ R~ ~ '~ Fi',R K ' ~ b S ~ d~f'~ p ~ r ~6 u t v 8 0 0 ~~ NO o a lY c p o °o, S _ w E v ~ ' : S a ~, oB & m, i q e C e o N ~ li m ii • 9I I °o ~o - 'o py S E ~ ~ S y ao :' ~ m l m' o o « ry aa m C ~ $ $ >~o ~ g o I$ a °~ e d 8 fl g ~ ~~ m d n 6 9 m m n ~ r Q(d U I E ~ m m K' P H $ F .. _ 9. . U d~ l o a ~, e u eI I ~', _X 0 8 0 0l0 ° 0 ~8 .,,0 8 e~ 8 18 - g iI' ~ 8 , R o a $ i ~, gl g n N ~ ~ U J ~ o ~ o "~ ~ I ~ " g m a o s m . , ° ~ ~ ~ N N s o ~ - -- O ~_ N _ o a o ° o a o m ° s N o ~ U " ~ r i i I ul ~ma ~i ~ a x ~ ~ : ~ ' j" ~ a _ m I ~ o~~ A s ~ o S o m~ a~ a o ? °sm ° o ~ o _V "I IN K N l I l ~ ~ o I t s ~ f - - . II I . N ~c UN m =I'N n m .. ~! C~ m 9 Y bi E p L O O ' 0d 9 0Q - dry V~ N '~C j.9 `- q J t i G 6 ,~/I Q 2 L. Vi m m~ ~ m J W i~v o• ~ ; N U V D L i~ N [ V-V N ~ U L 9 L 3 O q N ~ N C O ~ 9 U Q Q LL LL Q F-,LL 1- LL N 2 F- C) T LL Y~U 41 W V-i F- 111 X r y RESOLUTION N0. 91-194-A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION N0. 91-194, TO INCLUDE USER FEES FOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES AND REN7AL5 A. Recitals. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 91-194 establishing a Comprehensive Fee Schedule; and, WHEREAS, current rates of user fees for recreation activities and rentals have now been established; and WHEREAS, all consumaD le costs are to be recovered; and, WHEREAS, the fallowing groups are defined: Group I: City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and co-sponsored events; other governmental agencies serving Ra ncha Cucamonga residents. Group 2: City resident not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations whose management is not paid and orgranizations sponsoring a public forum or canidate's night. Group 3: City resident not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations who has paid management. Group 4: City resident private party activity, City re 5ident employee organizations, City resident political candidate Use for fund raisers; City resident college organizations and committees; work parties and social events. Group 5; City resident commercial, business, profit-making and religious organizations, non-resident not-for-profit, civic and social organizations; non-resident colleges, their organizations and committees, non-resident private party activity, non-resident employee associations. Group 6: Non-resident commercial, business, profit-making and religious organizations. D, Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Illy Section 6.0 - Recreation Fees Field Lights: Fees for electrical use of lights by specific user groups are as follows: Field Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 90' Ballfield $16.08 $16.08 $16.08 $17.00 $20.00 $25.00 60' Ballfield $12.21 $12.21 $12.21 $13.00 $16.00 $21.00 Soccer Field $ 8.34 $ 8.34 $ 8.34 $ 9,00 $12.00 $17.00 Tennis Courts $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 Equestrian Rings $ 2.13 $ 2.13 $ 2.13 $ 3.00 $ 6,00 $11.00 Staff Fee: None None Nonc $ 6,25 $ 7,50 $ 7.50 (when necessary) (Keys will be given to representatives of Group I - 3) Classes: Annual Increases of 25% of the fee until the median cost for simil iar classes in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario and Upland are achieved. Norkshops: Annual Increase of 10% of the fee until the median cost for similiar classes in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario and Upland are achieved. Facility Rentals: Hourly fees for week day and Saturday use as follows: (Sunday and Holiday use will be charged the 5 p,m. to 8 a.m. rate.) Building Rentals Hourly Fee: Room Time Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Size Small Sam-5pm None $ 3,75 $ 7.50 $15.00 $15.00 $30.00 Small 5pm-8am None $ 7.50 $12.00 $25.00 $25.00 $50.00 Large 8am-5pm None $ 5.00 $10.00 $25.00 $25.00 $50.00 Large 5pm-8am None $10.00 $15.00 $35.00 $35,00 $70.00 Kitchen Hourly Fee: Sma11 None $ 2.00 $ 2.00 $ 3.00 $5.00 $ 5.00 Large None 8 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 7.00 $10.00 $10.00 I Other Fees: The facilities rental fee shall be charged for fund raisers, plus 10% of the gross and, if additional City staff is required, $6.25 per hour for the staff time. When a damage deposit is required, the charge is $200.00. Per Day Charges Coffee Pot small $ 2.00 Coffee Pot large $ 5.00 Small stage $10.00 Large stage $50.00 T.V. w/ video player $20.00 Nicro phone $ 5.00 Small PA system $40.00 Slide projector $10.00 Professional style lights $ 3.00/per light Piano at RCNC $25.00 (The piano is tuned Dy the City twice a year. If Lhe piano does not meet the standards of the user, the City will arrange for tuning at the user's sole expense. Tuning fees will oe added to rental cost.) Day Camp and Athletic Camps: Non-City sponsored day camps or athle*_ic camps that use a City field will he charged the City Field Rental Rate per field used. Non-City sponsored day camps or athletic camps that use a City picnic area or shelter will be charged the Picnic Reservation Permit Fee. A $25.00 non-refundable deposit will oe paid to hold each week of the camp. That deposit shall apply toward the total fee. Field Rentals - City: The following fees shall be paid oy all local sports organizations (youth and adult) as well as picnickers or others reserving a field. Usage Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Seasonal None $175.00 $200.00 N/A N/A N/A Weekly None $ 20.00 $ 30.00 N/A N/A N/A Hourly None $ 2.00 $ 3.00 55.00 $10.00 $10,00 Field Use - Schools: the following reservation fees shall apply: Usage Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Groups 4-5 Seasonal None $30.00 $35.00 N/A I1~R~ Community Amphitheater: The following are hourly rental fees for amphitheaters: The first hour of monitoring is included in Lhe stage rental for groups 2 and 3. Usage Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Stage None $25,00 E40.00 $72.00 $72.00 $72.00 Sound Monitor None $10.00 $10.00 $26.75 $26.75 $35,00 Tournaments: A $50.00 non-refundable deposit is required to reserve fields. Said deposit shall apply to final field rental totals. Should there be a need for City staff to oversee and coordinate activities, the fee is $10.86 per hour. The reyuestor shall meet all liability insurance requirements for usage of facilities and provide additional equipment needed to hold the tournament at there own cast. Usage Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Per Day None $20.00 $30.00 $70.00 $70.00 $125.00 Equestrian Center: Fees for this area will De as follows: Usage Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Groups 4- 6 Youth Horse Shows None $50 $50 N/A Adult Horse Shows E100 $100 N(R (no snack bar) Room Rental See Small Room Rate Each Arena None Youth Rctivities $10 Youth Activities $15 N/A Adult Activities $25 Adult Activities $30 N/A Fee for lights (see field lights above) Open Public Use None $6 $6 $6 Park and Picnic Reservation Permits: This fee will be per picnic shelter not per permit. Usage Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group b Day Or Portion of Day None $10.00 $15.00 $25.00 435.00 $50.00 111AP~ Snack Bar: For City-owned snack bars located in City parks, Usage Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 - 6 Seasonal None $450.00 N/A Other non-profit groups bringing in snack bars (i.e, trailers) will be charged a flat $300 seasonal permit fee, unless group is participating in a City sponsored event. Non-Resident Charge: A $5.00 fee shall be paid by each non-resident, each class, each team, each season to participate in City sponsored classes. Said fee is payable at the time of registration. C. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective with its adoption. PASSED. APPROVED, AND A00 PTEO this 20th day of November, 1991. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Oenn is L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the fu regoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of November. 1991. Executed this 20th day of November, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, California, 111 RC~ RESOLUTION NO. 91-194-A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91-194, TO INCLUDE USER FEES FOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES AND RENTALS A. Recitals. WHEREAS, the City Council of the Clty oP Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 91-194 establishing a Comprehensive Fee Schedule; and, WHEREAS, current rates of user fees for recreation activities and rentals have now been established; and WHEREAS, all consumable costs are to ba"recovered; and, WHEREAS, the following groups are defined: Group 1: City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and cosponsored events; other governmental agencies serving Rancho Cucamonga residents. Group 2: City resident not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations whose management is not paid and organizations sponsoring a public forum or candidates night. Group 3: City resident not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations who have paid management. Group 4: City resident private party activity, city resident employee organizations, city resident political candidate use for fund raisers; city resident college organizations and committees; work parties and social events. Group 5: City resident commercial, business, profit-making and religious organizations, non-resident not- for-profit, civic and social organizations; non-resident colleges, their organ izationa and committees, non-resident private party activity, non-resident employee associations. Group 6: Non-resident commercial, business, profit-making and religious organizations. E• Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 6.0 - Recreation Fees Pield Lights: Commencing in calendar year 1992 and continuing until amended by the City Council, each user group shall be charged Peas equal to 50$ of the costs of electricity used to provide light to that user group. This charge shall be reviewed prior to the first date of each year in which it is in effect subsequent to calendar year 1992. Classes: Commencing in calendar year 1992, each user shall be charged SOE of the median cast for similar classes in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario, and Vpland. Commencing January 1, 1993, Pees will be charged 100$ of the median coat for similar cla ses in the cities oP Chino, Fontana, Ontario, and Upland. '~(Jpi p,i'FA 9'aWv.{f -F.ht n,(bµQ, Ayr -~ KKOr]cshopa ~COmmen- -king in calendar pear 1992 ,~~ea h ( ~~ (~ user shall be charged 50$ of the median cost for similar~~'~ classes in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario, and Upland. \ ' Commencing January 1, 1993, fees will be charged 100$ oL the J median cost for similar classes in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario, and Upland. Facility Rentals: Hourly fees for week day and Saturday use as follows: (Sunday and holiday use will be charged the 5 p.m. to 8 a.m. rate.) Building Rentals Hourly Pea ROOM TIME GROUP GROUP GROUP GROVP GROUP GROUP SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 Small Sam-5pm None $ 3.75 $ 7.50 $15.00 $15.00 $30.00 Small 5pm-Sam None 7.50 12.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 Large Sam-5pm None 5.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 50 00 Large 5pm-Sam None 10.00 15.00 35.00 35.00 . 70.00 Kitchen Hourly Fee Small None $2.00 $2.00 $3.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 Large None 5.00 5.00 7.00 10.00 10.00 Other Pees The facilities rental fee shall be charged for fund raisers, plus 108 of the gross and, if additional city staff is required, $6.25 per hour for the staff time. When a damage deposit is required, the charge is $200.00 Per Day Charges Coffee Pot (small) $ 2.00 Coffee Pot (large) 5.00 Small stage 10.00 Large stage 50.00 T.V. W/video player 20.00 Microphone 5.00 Small PA system 40.00 slide prof actor 10.00 Professional style lights 3.00/light Piano at RCNC 25.00 (The piano is tuned by the City twice a year. If the piano does not meet the standards of the user, the City will arrange for tuning at the users sole expense. Tuning fees will be added to rental cost.) Comaunity Amphitheater: The following are hourly rental fees for amphitheaters. The first hour of monitoring is included in the stage rental for groups 2 and 3. USAGE GROUP GROUP GROUP GROUP GROUP GROUP 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stage None $25.00 $40.00 $72.00 $72.00 $72.00 Sound Monitor None 10.00 10.00 26.75 26.75 35.00 Tournaments: A $50.00 non-refundable deposit is required to reserve fields. Said deposit shall apply to Final rental totals. Should there be a need for city staff to oversee and coordinate activities, the fee is $10.86 per hour. The requestor shall meet all liability insurance requirements for usage of Facilities and provide additional equipment needed to hold the tournament at there own cost. USAGE GROUP GROUP GROUP GROUP GROUP GROUP 1 2 3 4 5 6 Per Day None $20.00 $30.00 $70.00 $70.00 $125.00 Snack Har: For city-owned snack bars located in city parks. USAGE GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3 6 Seasonal None $450.00 N/A Other nonprofit groups bringing in snack bars (i.e. trailers) will be charged a flat $300 seasonal permit fee, unless group is participating in a city-sponsored event. Non-Resident Charge: A 55.00 fee shall be paid by each non-resident, each class, each team, each season to participate in city-sponsored classes. Said fee is payable at the time of registration. C. Resolution Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective with its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th dey of November 1991. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. stout, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of November 1991. Executed this 20th day of November, 1991, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATH: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayor and Membe re of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager PROM: Brad Huller, City Planner HY: Nancy Ponq, Senior Planner SU&7SCT: APF HAL OF CONDITIONAL U3H PHPl1IT 78-03 RHVOCATION- HAWS PWCH - Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Co®Seslon•e decision to rewke Conditioml Dee Permit 78- 03 for the operation of a Dar in conjunction with a restaurant located in the Neighborhood Coo•ercial District at 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56, through 60. (Continued frog October 16, 1991) APPBAL OF CONDITIONAL USS PHNM2T 73-03 - SAM'S PLACH - Consideratinn of an appeal of the P1nnning Cosleaion'e decision to deny the request to extend the hours oP operation and amend the Condltlw of Approval prohibiting live entertainment for an existing restaurant and Der located in the Neighborhood Comercial Dietrl et at 6fi 20 Carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian S Greets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued from October 16, 1991) APPHAL OF DHN IAL OP SNTHRTA INMHNT PBRNIT 91-02 - SAN'S PLACH - Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Co®Seeion'e decision to deny the request to conduct live entertainment Sn conjunctioH with a restaurant and bar located So the Neighborhood Coo•erclal District at 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued from October 16, 1991) RECOM107DASI0~ Staff recommends that the Ciiy Council uphold the Planning Commisaian's decision in rewking the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) [ar a bar tact lity and denying the related amendments to Conditional Uee Permit 78-03 and the enteztaiment Permit 91-02. attached to this report are the appropria[e reeolutlone Eor Council's action tonight. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 78-03r EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE APPEAL November 20, 1991 Page 2 BACRGADUND The above described items were continued from the October 16, 1991 meeting at the request of the applicant. On September 11, 1991, the Commission revoked the Conditional Uee Permit and denied the related amendments requesting an extension of the hours of operation and elimination of the Condition of Approval prohibiting live entertainment and the related Hntertainment Permit. For more detailed background information, please refer to Hxhibit "G" which is the chronology of the history of the business location. AHALiSIS As a re cult of a routine code enforcement inveati gation, the use was found to involve live music entertainment and operating hours extending beyond 11:00 p.m. The Commission conducted a rnmpllance review on Auquat 14, 1991 and also considered the app ll cnnt's request to extend the hours of operation and io conduct live enteztainment. There was one resident who objected to the nuiennce problems created by Same Piece. The applicant, however, did not indicate to the Commission whether Re will comply with the Conditions of Approval. At the conclusion of this compliance review, the Commission found and ~btetmined that there was auf Eicient evidence indicating the business ie not operating in a manner consistent with the Conditions of Approval ae contained in Resolution Noe. 83-117A and 91-007 (Hxhibit "H") SpeclEica lly, the violations included extending the hours of operation beyond fhe 11:00 p.m. limitation and providing live entertainment. The Commission then set a public hearing for September 11, 1991 to mneider the rewcation of the CUP for a bar facility. At the rewcation hearing of September 11, 1991, the Commission heard public testimony. Approximately 17 people spoke in favor of allowing Sam's Place to operate beyond the 11:00 p. m. limitation and having live entertainment. The applicant also submitted to the Commission a petition that supported hie business. At this meeting staff also reported to the Commission that a resident had telephoned the Ciey voicing hie objections to the nuisances created by Same Place (i.e., loud noise). See memo to file September 11, 1991 (Exhibit "B^). The Commission considered the public Snput end all other previous evidence. The majority of the Commission affirmed a previous determination that the applicant ie not operating hie bueineea Ln compliance with the Conditions of Approval. The majority of the Commission also confirmed Chet the extension of hours of operation, together with the live entarta Snment, would not provide competlbility to the surrounding residences. The Commission then rewked the Conditional Uae Permit and denied the related amendments to the Conditional Uae Permit and Bntertainment Permit. Attached for the Council's review are copies of the September 11 and Auquat 14, 1991 Plennlnq Comiiaeion minutes. Staff received two compla lnt le here after the public hearing; ll3 CITY COUNCIL STAFP REPORT CUP 7H -03, SP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE APPEAL November 20, 1991 Page 3 one letter was from a property owner and the other was from a nearby reai dent. eoth patties objected to the extension of operating hours at Sam's Place. Attached to this report are three reaolutionat one partai na to the revocation of Candi tlonal Uae Permit 7E-03 for a bar facility end the other two relate to the denial of Entertainment Permit 91-02 and the amendments to the Conditional Uee Permit 78-03. Staff taco®enda that the Council require the operation of the bar facility to cease and desist within ten days. The applicant may continue to operate the restaurant business with Sncldenial beer and wine aervlcel however, the bar foci llty moat cease to operate within ten days. Staff will inform Alcoholic Beverage Control regarding the tewcation of Conditional Use Permit 7H-03 for the bar facility. PA{.TS POR l1~ImG8 In order to approve this appeal, in full or in part, specific facto to support the folloring findings moat be made by the City Council: A. Revocation of CUP 7H-03 1. Find that the CUP is being conducted in an appropriate manner and that no action to modify or retake it 18 necessary. B. Amendments to CUP 78-03 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Coda, and the purposes of the district in which the site Ss located; and 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or relfere or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinityl end 3. That the proposed use complies rith each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. C. Entertainment Permit 91-02 1. The conduct of the eatabllahment or the granting of the application would 6e contrary to the public health, safety, morale, or welfare. 2. The premises or eatabliehment is likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, oz disorderly manner. 3. The applicant, or any other person associated with him as principal or partner or in a poa Stlon or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct Of the business fot which each permit is sought to be issued, hoe been convicted in ~iy CITY COUNCIL STAPP RBPORT CUP 78-03, 6P 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE APPEAL November 20, 1991 Page 4 any court of Competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or perEOrmance of any obscene show of any kind or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude or has had any approval, permit, or 1lcenae laeued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or Lhe provisions of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years. 4. The the granting of the application would create a public nuisance. 5. The the normal operation of the premises aould interfere with the peace end quiet of any surrounding re9ldential neighborhood. b. The applicant hoe not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement oP material fact in. the required application. CORAE9POMOLICJ This item hoe been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Oai ly Bulletin newspaper and the property owners within a 300-foot radius have been notified. R u ubm e , J er le City Planner BH:NP: sp Attachments: Exhibit "A^ - Applinent'a appenl letter Exhibit 'B" - Correspondence from adjacent reaidente end property owners 6xhibl[ "C^ - Auguei 14 and September it, 1991 Planning Commleaion minutes Exh161t "D" - July 24, August 1d and September 11, 1991 Coriasion StefE Reports Sxhlbit "E" - Co®Seeion Resolution No. 83-117A and Council Aeeolutlon No. 91-007 Exhibit "P" - Co®iseion Resolution Noe. 91-131, 91-132 and 91-133 Exhibit "G" Chronology of the history of the business location Exhibit "R" Petitions Reeeluiion of Rewcation Eor Conditional Uee Permit 78-03 Resolution of Denial Eor Amendments to Conditional Uee permit 78-03 Reaolut ion of Denial for Entertainment Permit 91-02 ~~s ~' Mwrrx~alxo rry B1tIGUGLI~ JOMND MAN NEfi IND SAL BAIUuG LIO Septembez 20, 1991 e~: ~~ k ~2~~k ~~\. ~~ ~~ " /C7 `. ~ECE~~F`~ The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council's Office Post Office Bor 807 10580 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: Conditlonal Dse permit 78-03 Sam's Place Councilmen: Mc. and Mra. Sam Pellegrino do hereby appeal to the City Council the decisions of the Planning Commlaalon on September 11, 1991 on the hezeinaf ter stated agenda items: 1. The revocation of Conditional Dse Pezmit 78-83; 2. The denial of the amendment to Conditiooal Dae Pezmit 78-83; 3. The denial of Entertainment Pezmit 91-02. The zeason for the appeal is to allow review of these decisions by the City Council. Appea f e of $126 Sa enclosed. Vezy t 1 youza, i MJItltlB : iiG\B IGOGLIO ~ o n Manna o JDMtt~ ~ 1 Enclosure ~ EXHIBIT Il /" A ~~ 9939 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE 110 / R~NCRO CeCAMON6 A, CA 917301 TEL plq 9B A~1100 / FA%17111 9a 1~86~0 EXIiIBTi' B " Correspondence from adjacent Residents CUP 78-03 CUP 7600 Amend 8P YI-09 CC : 110-. 70. lBOI I~~ ~~g /f _. G J 1 / L ~~~ MEMO TO FILE ~~//~~~ Record af: ~ Oace ____~~~D 9 ~pQ .Veecing ,~?,i / Prat. Oesa ~ ~I w~ / T'/ //~ '1LS Conversation P ne No. Time {T O/QL R/J.~ r ~/T"' fDDL~ f~.G 7' eY /~(~ 120 ~ -~ ~`'1f"l~~ LL,vn.~5 S%Gtw~' ~.~ Q~ I; U L II j n pgNCN6 CUCAMONGA 1`Gn.c~v ~~~~ ~{~• y~ AOMINISTk 11%N /orov C_u.;c (,,,,,f~,,,IJQ.~. ~ SEP 12 1991 (io„cFv, CU.cli,~ryiq, C'u ~}~^30 ~18ia~"~'~' L~ ~ L~ u~<~ r B eG<Y a ao 764 E, A8E Way mJP"IER.:Y ~ar~ 9~~:;~ 1~ayru,, S ia~..i, J rvt,,, -R..,. at 6619 f~ St R C i-k. No.,,,, 9 vk~ h,,,.~,. ~~ ,6R,ea~K,. ~h ~z Cam 02 ~~ o-~ net ~„ n.,.~il ~~,~ <--dL '~a~s~ , ~,.i-,.~., ~ a,,,,, -ru.chcw~ . fog„ /~ J J r, l F~fi'1 ~~l'I I!!!!!! 1~-1 Wy \a` ~, V ~ I N \ - ~ S M W ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~c\ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ \ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~~~\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ v ` ~ \ ti J l J \~ n ~' ~ 7. 1 ~ ~ 1 `Pi ~,. ~~ ~ a ~ ~ $ w ~` _ ~ ~ J ~ J ~- ~ ~, ~ J~ d ~? l 1 ~~ ~ ~~ s ~~ _~~~~ ,~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ J ,`1 I/~ \ ,~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ w ~ ~, ~ ~ , C~~ ~a Ir ~ J ~ ~~Z i EXHIBIT ~~ C " Sept. 11 ,Aug. 14 , .1991 Commission Minutes cw ve-w cw ism nm.m er e~-m cc : we.. ao, iw~ X23 Ma. 6ratt rspondad that those plena would not b• completed until et approval of the EIR end tM ENSP a they era lmpluoentat ion measure Sha eeid the ENSP will indicate the infrsrtructure Lhat is needed and t oCRSr plane will indicate how the ENSP will be impl•menbd. Chairman McNiel opened the public heaclnq. Tim des Laurier., ProfHwr, Oepattsnt of Biology, Chaf ey College, 5885 Nevan Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, prsenbd • latter regar nq the or lq ins and nature of tN bog and [h• knoll. Ne felt the saet net of tM water /apply to the bog and the nature and location of LM wabr diacharg• trom tN bog should b• eoneidered. H• aid the integrity of h• bog depend. upon the integrity of the water wart.. H• supported std reecemendat lone regarding the change newuary to rwue• the environment Impact. H• felt the number of unite should b• reduced and the bog should cat uld• •• open apace. Richard Douglas, Landmark Land Caapanyr e., 110 North Lincoln Avenue, Su Lt• 100, Corona, provided • letter object in to the City's proposl to reds Lgnat• some of their land a oqn sped. H u1d • partlon o[ the Landmark progrty i^ ouulde of [he elty •e eph•n lntluend. N• felt Ch• SpecLfie Plan should not be adopted until the A L adopted. He oDj•Cted to tM proposl to duignab Aalf of their Ian a open span Co protest tM bog and comply with the requut of the wild fa ageneiee and aid Landmark mould oppos any •fforb Dy the City to ac re Landmark land through an .semen[ or eminent domain. He thought the C y should noC rush to adopt the eNSP. Xotion: Moved Dy 't1•a, seconded by Neleh•r, to continue environmental impact Report tor;' p•el[Se Plan 90-03 and General Plan Amendment 90-076, Environmental Ae ement and Sp•citle Plan 90-01 and environmental Asesment snd c•neral P1 ~ Amendwnt 90-076 to October 9, 1993. Notlan carrled Dy the tollowln9 vot ~. AYES: //COMNISS ION[113: CH IT I[A, NCNZBL, M=LCIRR, VALLLTTe i NOES COMMI99IONeA3: NON. COMNZSSIONLRS: TOLSTOY -carrled CONDITIONAL: USe Pe0.~ T 78-0a - SAN'S PLiCe - The coneLd•ration of auepension ar revocation o[ • Condit tonal Us Permit allowing the op•ratlon of a Dar Ln conjunct Ion with • restaurant located in the Neighborhoad Comaarelal DLtrict at 6620 GrnelUn Street, norehuue terser of 19th and Carnelian Str•ete - APN: 201-611-55 through 60. H. CONDITIONAL ^Se Pe0.9IT 78-07 - EA_u'S PtaCe - A I•vLev of oompllanc• wits condition[ of approval and conald•raC Ion of wspenslon or r•vocat ion of tN condlt tonal Us P•rmlt for a r••taurant and bar locate/ in cha Neighborhood comm•rclal Diatrlet at 6620 carnelian Street, noc[hwa ec corner of 19Ch and GrnelLan Si[eet^ - APN: 201-511-53 through 60. ~COntinusd from August 1{, 1991.E Planning Commlu ion Minutes -4- September 11, :99: ~2y I, awwunwPUT Tn rnunrmrnuar. n5E PERMIT 7E-03 - SAM'S PLACE - A nquot to axtsnd eM hours of opsrat Lan and amend Che candic ion of approval prohibiting livi sntertainmsnt for sn sxiatin9 tHtwrant and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial DUtricL at fifi20 Carnelian SttNt, no rt hwaet corMr of 19th and Carnelian Sitaet• - APN: 201-811-96 through 60. (Coot inued from Auqu at 14, 1991.) rxT~nTAi NMENT PBRM T 91-OZ - EAM'E PLACE - A request to conduct live music in conluntiion with a nstauzant and bar locatW in the N•Lghborhood Commsreial DieirieC at 6620 Grnelian Strut, nort hweat cornet at 19th a0d Carnelian Stnet• - APffi 201-Bit-fib through 60. )Conti nub from August 16, 1991.) Chapman McNiel stepped down because of a pobni lal coot list of inbnet Ln that her playa on a aoRball team which U sponwrsd by Sam'• Plws. Nancy Ponq, Senior Planner, pnunted the ataft report. She crated eM had received • tQsphone call tram a rMidut who indiutad they could oat attend tonight's hprinq. She uld the resident eompLined of loud no La, Wer bottles and cane thrown into hie Dack yard, and alarms going o[f Ln the middle of the night. Vice Chairman Chltiu opened tM public hearing. John Nannerlno, Mannarlno G eriquglio, 9333 8aa Line Road, suite 130r Rantho Cucamonga, stated tM beer bottle anQ cane mould not have came frao Eam'• Place Deeeuw they do not allow bottles to leave the bar and they do not have cans. Re thought the bottle and cane could ba coming [rom pwple perches inq them at the two stores located our by. Ne elated • petition with over 1,000 signature had been pnuntsd to eM City and he indicated owr 90 perunt of the •ignrture wen Craa Rancho Cucamonga ruidents, xe uid tM •lgnaturee ware gathered only tram Lneide the praise. Me. Nanerina said the Planning Camoiu loo's role was to determine SC Ue land ee is utialaetory, not to act a^ a punitive body. He eked that the Coslulon aonelder the ndord of tN etaDliahaunt, stet inq Nr. Pel lagrino had not ben cited nor had then been •ny poYice activity. He rpueetea approval a[ the Entertainment Permit end did not tel • single guitar player should upset the Clty. The following people spoke in support o[ Su'• Plaw: SbpMn Jay Raulsan, 7E set 24th Etret, Vpland Robert Crinlend, 9280 Righland, Rancho Cucamonga Tao Crun, 9073 Caballero Driw, qucho Cucamonga Nick Dameco, 8840 Church Strut, Rantho Cucamonga Robert Jenklna, 5081 bacway Poad, Mneho Neamonga Jamie and Trisha Nernn, 8179 Vleara, Rancho Cucamonga Linda Andrews, 1271 Nut Springtield Strut, Upland Shawn Jenkins, 8377 Via LadeN, Rwcho Neamonga Cary Yermw, 8377 Orwge Stree, Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commies ion Mlnutee -9- 9eptemblr 11, 199: ~ZS They rtated that Sam'^ place sponwu sports teams and charities, Mr. Pel Ugrinm treats his pat tons with cons itlerat ion and acG u a friend and Eat Mr figure to hi+_aeployo+, Mr. Pal legrino tlou not allow people to drive if they era too inebriaGd, Sam's Plac. provldu a good environwnt and i• a nice place to take silents, and the cliental. i+ moat ly middle age people rather Chan young people. They thought the City should respontl to the needs of the small businessman and fQt the rwGUrant and bar is an economic aid to other bus ineeso in cmUr. They felt CM thrN prwious owners had failed because of iM tutrlct ions placed 6y the City and Sam'• Place would net be able to survive only u a restaurant calling beer and wine if LC was totted to sloes at 11:00 p.m. They indicated loud music playa from nearby homes and thry felt CN complaints were miadireeted. Hesri nq no furtDer Gat Lmony, Vice Chairman Chlt lea c1osW the public hearing. Shs stated that the City Council Dad already degrmined the otabliahment should sloes at 11:00 p. m. and tN Planning Cammiu ion was only trying to determine Lt tG conditions of approval are being met. Comoiuioner Meleher rtated tNt when the ltr wu Mfote tM Planning Camminion last year, he had supported the leer hours. He felt the support shown by the members of tN audience was a bssuti[u1 trSbuG to Mr. Pellegrino but esid G was disturbed to Dear Chat custowrs are allowed to !came so inebriated they must be driven hums. He ec®enCed that the City Council Md overruled Che Planning Casaoioion lest year and had rutricisd the hours to closing time of 11:00 p.m. He aid the testlaany nod made Lt very obvious that the businu• Ls not being operated under tDe conditions Imposed by the City Council. CoomLULoner yalLtte acted sM had not been on the Planning Cammieslon when the hours were voted upon. She agreed with Che CSty Connell that CM hour should be limi[ed Gcauw of the arw ad)acent to the otabllahment. She felt it would w a foes to Che eommunlty it the besieses cased to opera! bus ^he felt GDe owner was responsible Co see that he abided by the conditions of approval. vies Chairman Chit lea crated the concern of tM Planning Caamlq ion was whether ehs Dualnsu Ls Glnq operated under CM approved conditions of CM Condit tonal qp Pezmlt. She felt the applicant had not abided by the Condit ions which were directed by City Coune il. Shs ca®snted that the owner had bun advised he was In violation o[ Ne condltione, but Des continued to opera! In violation. She did not awl Lt to b• approprlaG to tM community [or people to dsbrmine they an beyond Che limits of what applies to other busineues Ln the eommunlCy. SDS did net fwl tM buslnees wes necessarily harmful, and Celt 11 the applicant Dad Desn aDldinq Dy iDS Condit lone, eM requut for extension of iM hour and approval of CDe esGrtainaent perms would have bun mon favorably considered. She rwgned the public hurlnq. Mr. Mannsrino rtaud the Planning Commies ion had an application before thw co esGnd the Dours. He felt Se wu within the Comminlon'• jurisdiction co extend the hours. Planning CamolesLon Minutes -6- September 11, 199: l2~ The following people aLo apoM in support of Sam'• Placr. Robin Patterson, 17582 8uttet Court, Fontana Joanna dour 7572 Malven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga John Na rx ln, 6348 VL• Serena, Rancho Cucamonga Ron Sharp 1354 xuter, Upland Charlo Bell, 6167 Toparr Rancho Cucamonga Stacy Barnett, 6730 Berkshire Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Mark 8chte1l, 6989 Meaada 8t[eet, Rancho Ntasgnga They Eelt the Planning caamteaion and Clty Council only give lip service and do not understand that Nr. Pellegrino•• llveilhoad L at stake. They thougRt Ue buefit• should ba considered and thorn la noehinq aftensive aDOUt the utaDl Uhmene. Thmy [elt the eonditlow ware placed on the bwineu becauu of proDlema with thru pnviow owes, but there haw not bun proDlema since Mt. Pellegrino took over to Dueiwu. They questioned why au'• Place la tN only Dat in town with hour restricted to 11:00 p.s. They bit the City wu heinq unfair Decauu only one complaint nod bun received. Thmy indicated the hueineu due not start pickln9 up until 11:00 ps. Decaua that la tM start of the social hour for uny peopL. TMy testified Chat sou noiu L generated at Peppers and eked why Pepper was allowed to stay open later. Thmy did not [u1 the busLnue would eurviw Lf LMy wan .forced to clou at 11:00 p. m. Thmy requeaied that the Planning Cae•SUion not rely on peat declslone of the City council, but iwtud uu a decision in Lvor of CDe DuLLnusman. V ice chairman Chie iea again cloud CDm puDl le Durlnq. !N stated that ueh permit i• on • cafe-by-cue bola. She old tM natrlctione worn for the beat ion ud wars Sspoeed by tM Cliy Council Dub on betlmny Caken at the city Council hearing. Comeiuloner Neleher stated that when GM Planning Comsioion led agree to exbnd the hours they had bun Sn[otmsd tMn ru a change Sn ownezehip. Ne uid that rhat wu nfon the CcamLeion this wenLnq wu not bcough! on Dy any action o[ tM Planning Comluion, but ntMt by the action of tM Clty Council Ln rutrlctinq the Douro. x. Ie1L !t raa not the purview o[ the Planning Comeluion to dui with tM econasiee of the low, Dut rather to regulate land use ud LM nlationehlps o[ uo to uo. xs eked it there wa^ a dit [Cron in tDe toning between 3u'• Place and Peppers. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated tDey wre both located in Neighborhood comnerclal coning. N. uid Chat Pepper L ad~teenL to tM freeway r~~ht-ot- way and does not haw any Down to the nortD or wet. xe old It doe^ have multi-[amlly Doueinq furtDer to tM Cut. comniu LOMr Valletn agreed that tM original rueon for 1laitinq tM hours wu the proximity to nslghborlnq reaidenwe. Shs u1d the Planning CasnL•ion had received uveral campLlnn ud information Eros Codm ^n[orcemenc cagardinq eMlr Snspeet Lon. SM [alt that it tM Co~iulon decided it wa• Planning Comeau ion Mlnutu -7- September 11, 1991 ~2~ accept ab la tar the Ow inu• to continw operating beyond the 1SmiU of their condix ions o[ approval, it would ut a dangetou• prec+d+nt that 1[ a businsu did not lik+ the houis impo ud, th+y could }usi set [hair own haute. BM wid when Coda Entoresmsnt Md rsquutad Chat the owner adh+r+ to the reai[ietlona, the owner rsfussd, and shs did not ful the mat Ur ^hou ld b+ taken Lightly. CommlesioNr Melchor agreed that it was very clus that current conditions w+re being violated, but said an application was Wfoa the Cammluion to extend the houra and permit live sntertalnment. H+ Katsd that other applications ors often approval on an afbr-thrfacC Du L. Ms commented that Mi. Pel Lgrino had appl led for an enurtainmen! pecmit when h+ found out one would be nseuury. He did not u+ any flagrant 'problems with tM application. Mr. But Lr indicated that tN OevelopaMnt Cod. etltee any action which hat been tlanLd cannot be ructlvated within a year. Commtuioner Meicher stated that the Plannlnq Commiulon had voted to extend the hour on September 13, 1990. B. asked it tM twelve months could be counted from that time. 8111 Curly, Deputy City Attorney, stated that typltally t!u ilMfrasm starts at the time of final action. M. told typically that would W at tM tla,e of the Plannlnq Commiulon decielon, Dut the period would hart at the time of the Clty Council decision In January 1991 Wuuu of the appeal. , Mr. Buller suggested that the Co®iuian set Bret on the amendment to the conditional uw permiL, next tM snUrtalmaenL permit, followed by the review of compliance with tM conditional uN pereii, and finally tM COnslderatron to eu+pend or revoke the eondit Tonal use permit. Commiotonec Valletta stated that any Planning Commiulon decLion could he appealed to city Council by eitMr CM owner or LN community. Cammluioner Melchor Celt Lt wu reasonaDL to conclude tram tM teat tawny that ttfe applicant i• not operating in compl Lnce with the condition• o[ approval. He uld that • tuspenelon or revocation would only alLeat the eal• of hard liquor. He uid that CM Code would no! technically allow fns Commission to approve • eNnge o[ houra. Mr. Curley stated thaC the Code dwe not permit atteptanCe o! GM applleat ion, but because it was accepted, the Planning Commlesion could act on CM request. Commie loner Val Ltu did not feel It La appropriate [as this typo of us+ co be adjacent to res ldential nsighborhoode. She felt eM type o[ uw provLdee a wrvice to the community, Due she felt it should not G ad~annt to hwus. Motion: Moved by Va11etU, seconded by Chltlu, to adopt the resolution denying lmendment to Conditional Uu Permit 7B-OJ, Motion carried by th• Co llowinq vote: Plannlnq Conmin ton Minutes -B- Septendoer 33, :39: ~~ AYE9: COMlII99I0NER3: CNZTZEA, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONER9: MELCNBA AE9ENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOL9TOY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL -carried Conmiuicnsr Valletta stated that coneiebnt with her Lelinga that ouch a uu should net ba adjacent to hcuau, eb could not support the entertainment permit application. Commiotoner Melcher aeked to have the public hearing reopened. Vice Chairnan Chit lea rwpened the public hearing. comaLeioner Melcher asked Lf tb applicant proposed Aavinq one or two people entertain and it the guitar mould be acoustic or amplified. Sam Pel legrino, Sams Plaea, 6620 Carnelian, Rancho Cucamonga, replied he did not care !t there wu one or two enbrtalmn. Ne uid CAe guitar would ba acoustic. Re crated that Ale juke box Babe more noio tAan CM guitar player. b caaseented [Aar tAe .hopping center Aad beeq built before tb Aouu• and ib freway will eventually b Saediately behind hie 6usineu. Vice Chairman CAltiu again eloead eha public baring. Motion: Moved by Va11atU, seconded by Melcher, t0 adopt tM tuolution denying Entertainment Permii 91-02. Mat ton carried by tb follwinq vote: AYE9: C0MMI93IONEA9i ~~CHITIEA, VALL[Tf6 NOES[ COl01299IONEA9: MELClRR ABSENT: COMNI88IONEAE: TOLSTOY ABSTAIN! C0MNISSIOMER9s NCNIEL -carried Co®LLLOnar Iulrbr eared he had voted against prohibiting live entertai:went coneieNat witA Aia voL on the the AmendMnt to Conditional vu Permit 75-03. vice Chairman CAitiea asked [or coaeaenb on tAe rwlew o[ compliance with the conditional uu permit. 9M felt au [ficlent lntoraNtion had bwn Mara in cna public acrimony to conlirm tb act lone of tb previous meeting in which en• Cammluion ut tAe public hearing for consideration o[ euepens ion or revocation o[ tb condli Tonal use permit. Cammi utoner. Val LtN and Nelcbr concurred. Planning Comolu ion Mlnutq -9- September li, :'r :. 1 L I Commieoioner Xelcha[ caked if the Comm is •ion could formulate a referral of the Commiuion•• awaranue of tM rears-caoplianca to eha City Council to permit CM City Council take the action becassee it was tM contllt SOn~ imposed by the city Council that were not being adhered to. Hr. Curley et at ad that Ge City Code does not provide for a nonvci ion altarnat ive. Ma uld the proper course would be to Cake an action and the applicant or any other lntorested party eou ld appeal. Hot ion: Moved by Valletta, ueondad by Chitin to adopt eha neolution revoking Conditional Vw Pamir 78-07. Motion carried by tM following votr. AYES: COMMISSIONBRS: CH ITZEA, VALLETT6 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COM1fI33TONERS: TOLSTOY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIELr l2LCERR -carried Commie LOnet Melchor etatad he nod abKained tram vo[Lnq baeauu the matter was balore eha Co®LSlon for violations which do not violate what M had voted for tM previous yur and ha did not foal ho could voG to put eameone out o! baeineu. Mr. Nannerino did not tNl the Vote was valid t»cauee he felt Caaoieelonar Xe1cMr'• tbetentlon invalidated the qucrua. Mr. curlay stated Chat hL undentandlnq wu that tM abstention would not dssercy eho quorwe. xe said typically an abetention would qo toward the majority. He felt tM coemluion had taken • valid action bee eugquted the Commie ion may with to continue the Lune of rwocation to the next meet ing. Ha said tradlelona lly an abstention 1• counted toward the maintenance of a quorum. Ns suggntsd that It the vote were not valid, CM matter coultl bs appealed administratively to the City Council to hwe then dint[ it back [or [atone idarat ion at the vote. Vice Chairman Chitiea preferred the matter qo forward. the felt it .a important that one member o[ the camaunity data not get eonslderation that other mamWn of the community are not afforded. SM hit it Ss lmporunt Shat the Cossluion not uy Lt L acnptabl• [or eomeons to vioLaU cored itione of approval just becaeN tMy may W • nice person. Tha Planning Comsiuion neeued from 9:10 p. m. to 9:75 p.m. Planning Commie ion Minutes -10- September il, :+;~. i 3a Euller suggested eha commies ion may wish eo eontinue t0 a workshop on It 22, 1991. Chairman 7i•1 tnankad taow who participated in th. prate u. Noticn: Moved Me lch•r, seconded by Val latt•, to continue Environmental Aeessemen[ and Deve ent Code Amendment 91-02r Environmental Aoeument antl Etiwanda Specific Plan ndment 91-02A, Environmental Aseu•ment and Tarca Vista Planned Community Amendment 91-02r and Environmental Auuemant and Victoria Planned Community A:oindment 91-03 to 3:30 p.m. on Auquat 22, 1991. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHIT ffiA, MCNI[L, MELCNER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COlOfISSI0NEA6: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried TM Planning Commission recwud from 8:40 p.m. to S:EO p.m. '~\ J. ENTERTAINMENT P[AMIT 91-02 - SAN'S PLiC6 - A [equ•at CO COOdurt live mule in eon)unctlon with • rniaurant and Dar located !n the NelghDOrhood Co:~•reial Dletrict at 6620 Carnelian StrNt, northwaL corner of 19th and Car n•11an St[pCa - APN: 201-811-96 through 60. (COntlnued from July 26, 1991.) K. CONDITIONAL U56 P[RNIT 78-03 - SAN'9 PLane - A review of compliance with conait ions o! approval and conaiaeration o[ euepenalon or revocation of the Conditional Uu Permit for • reetaurat and bat located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian SirMta - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (continued from July 24, 1991.) L. A3:PNOMFNT TO CONDITIONAL U°6 PE0.wIT 78-0 - P - A aquae[ Co extend the hours of operation and amend the condition of approval prohibiting live nartainment for an exiatlnq aaGUrant and bar loceud in the Neighborhocd Commercial Dletrict at 6620 Carnelian St nee, nor[hwnt corner of 19th and Gtnellan 9trtlCe - MN: 201-811-56 through 60. (COntlnued [ram July 24, 1991.) Chairman McNiel excuud hLnplf tram tM meeting becaup of a you ibis conflict of lnuast a he plays on t wttDall team aponaoad Dy Sam's Place. Brad eu ller, city Planer, ataNO that tM appllcant'a attorney had ind uaud they would be requntinq a continuance. Vice Chairmen Chitin opened the public hsarlnq. Planning Commiaa ion Ninut•s -3~- Augu at 14, . l31 John Hannarino, 9333 Sae/ Lino Road, 8uita 110, Rancho Cu eamonga, stated he repraesntad Sam and Luanne Pel Ugrino. HO requsaGd the item b. continued to Auquat 28, 1991 becauw the applicant was currently in na9otiatione fcr a new location. Ha felt ehs new location would addrsa• the concern/ of the City. Vice Chairmen Ch it iae asked if thars wee a •ignad contract for Lh/ now location. Mr. Hannarino reapondad negative ly. Ha /rid thf now location is Eno Straw Hat at Carnes ion and 19th StresL which L adjacent to rout 30 and esryl Park. He Bald they wrs currently diacwalnq the poa/1bL ewve with the buLldin9 ownsrt the bank which carriae tM loan on the property; and Lswia Homes, the owner of the property. N. felt the now location will satiety the concerns of the City and the dlair/a at the appllcanta. Commie aio nsr Msleher eked if the matter wre to M continued if it wa• the intent of tM applicant to comply with tn. .arrest condition/ of the Conditional Up Permit. Ha .eked it Mr. Mann/rlno'• chant than intended to comply during any period of time it would take to more. He /old roar • hw w/ka may not uem long tc the applicant but even two day/ may ful like a long rim. to the nsLghborlnq n/iunts. Mr. Hannarino staGd Mr. P/llegrino would h/ve to anawr regarding hi/ Lntent loo. Ha s3•Ld that to hie knowl/dge char. nod only dun on. comp Lint. Ha commsnt/d that not on. n/ighbor nod appsar/d during six prwioua public hearings Ha acid there have not b//n any complaints to th. poi SC/ or Eira departni/nt during the past 18 months. Commiulonst Vel Ltte a/k/d if it ie trw that th/ operation of the buaineu sae bean going on aEGr tM p/tmlttsd hours. Nr. Mannarino said ha thought that had hapgn/d. commls/ions Val Ltt• uk.d i! there L live snt/rtalnmsnt which i• not permiCGd undK tM euti/nt coed itiaN. Mr. Mano/rinc .aid M undsr/tand/ th/r/ is an acoustic quLCar plays who play without pay. Ha uld that under City ordlnanc/ • p/rmlt wind not bs required if ha ware a solo piano player or a harpist. commie ions Vallats etat/d /he Lit ConmLLLonsr M/lehsr'• quutlona were valid. Commie ionsr ToLtoy uld h. wu not oppo//d to continuing tM matter for a few wuk/ i[ the owner U willing to comply with tN currant Conditional Uee Permit. Vice Chairman ChitLU uLd •M wa^ eonwrnw about • contLnuanee bwauw there have bun violation/ and aN had not surd any uanranc// tMt iM via lotion. will cu a• in the next two weka. She comm/nbd coat wm it tM applicant ware /uccuUUl in n/got Ltimn/ for th/ saw loutlon, a pv6llc hating would b/ squired for • new conditional uu permit and Lt would thmretoa probably ba soma time before the Du inn/ i• moved. Planning Commie ion Minute/ -$- Auquat 14, :9>: 13 Z Commiu ioner Val lefts agrud that tM applicant ha• not shown that they are operating within th+ Nrme of the existing Conditional Vea Permit. Commies ioner Ne lcher sCeUd that approximately a year ago ins Planning Commies ion approved extended hour/ for Sa1o'• Place. He said that decision was overruled by the City Council and he felt the Commiu ion now hoe tM Council'• direction. Ha enid chat in spite of the Council'• detetminat ion, she applicant hoe fountl it impost ibis to comply with it• current approval •. Ha felt that any extene ion of Lime beyond tonight could have to be tied to au urance from the applicant that they would abide by all of the conditions of approve l• for whet veer time they contlnw to do bu sinus at the lr current location. commissioner Valletta felt eM CommLeion snow ld hold [he public hurlnq and racarve tutimony before deciding if the matter should be eontinwd. CommistioMr To Ltoy agrod. Nanny Fong, cantor Planner, pruented tDe staff report. Commiu ioner Me1cMt asked how Che CammLSion should deal with the propcud amendment to the Conditional Vu Permit. Ralph Naneon, Deputy City ettacney, ataCed the application should not have bean accepted beeauu the Development Code specific that wDen • matter Da• bun denied the City should not crept !or filing a ubttantially similar applieal ion for a period o! one yur. Ha uid sett made tM error, Dut it had now proceeded to being placed on Che agenda. Ne said the Commiuion could hear the evidenu. He uid Lt LDe Commiolon wuted to act on the application, he Eelt Chey could. Vice Chairman invited further public eoasoent. Mr. Mannerino felt Che appl tree ion for expansion of Douro could W considered by tDe Commiu ion becauu it had Don accepted. Ne thought the condlt ions currently axLting on the Conditicntl Ual Permit ass not viable to a euccusful butlnue. He stated the applicants are not eriminaL, merely bus inu• peopL trying to make a succeutul buslneu out of what nod bon a very unsuceeutul Dusineu• Ne stated It L^ true Chat there have been violet ion• of Lhe currant conditions ex ist lnq on the butlneo a set by city Council, but M old there haw Dssn no vin lesions Ln Cerme of hour of opeution which had originally been approved by tM PLnnlnq Commiu icn. Ha felt they have demonstrated during the lot 18 months chat they can operate such a bualneu wiUCUt unduly interrupting the peace of the nelghDOrhoad. He uid he had uen thr letter of camplalnt which had Deen cant Go CM City bus the •herift hu no retard of any cal l• Co the premios. He indicated hie of fiu had bun in contact with the indlvldul• who had writLn Che letter and in fact it wu hL underetandlnq Ghat the people who had writun the lesser haw gone into 5am'• Place. Xe felt there i^ not one otter bar/relGUrant in the city uh Lch hu had no sports to Lhe police Ln 1B months of operation. Ha tnought tMy were entitled Co continue with Lhe hours o[ operation which they haw bun keeping Ln compliance with the sugquted trial period which the Plenn ing Commiu ion MSnuUe -y} auqu st 14, 199 133 PLanninq Commies ion approved. Ha thought it would not be equit ab la [m close down their busino• because ono person doesn't like it. Ha said they would like eo add a singer to the acoustical gu itariat. He thought ihs Planning Commiaeion should not act as a punitive body. Ha acid if the Code Enforumsnt department wants to cite his client for be inq in violation of an ordinance, than the validity of the ordinance can be dwided in a court mt law. xe said the Commieaion'a purpose i• to datszmine if the businau act Lvitiu taking place on the premiae• era in compliance with the sort of buelneea activit ins which should be Caking place [hero. Ha uid rutrietiona and eondit ions imposed by government mould be for the purpose of allowing the maximum freedom for the use of the prsmiaea without unduly zeetrictlnq the libat2 tea and freedoms o[ others. Me requuted an expansion o! tM Conditional Uae Permit and approval of the EnGrtainment Permit. Vice Chairman Chlt iaa' eked Mr. Mannerlno if hL client understood Che direction from the City Council regasdlnq the hour of oparat ion end compliance •o far as entertainment. Mr. Mannerino responded he would not apaeulate a to what Mt. Pel Lgrlnc undaratood. Vice Chairman Chltlu caked if Mr. Mannerino undaratood. Mr. Mannerlno replied that it wu not relevant wMthsr he understood. Sam PelUgrlno, Sam's Place, 6670 Carnelian, Aueho Cucamonga, stated there wu nothing he could wy that hadn't DNn uid 6y Mr. Mannerino. He uid that tluring LM 18 months hs has been tMre, he hu tried to keep prop lame out of his utabliahmenC. He tali M Dad not broken any lave becauu his liquor licanu cite houca of 6:00 a. m. to 7e00 a. m. Ne uid M undaratood that Dn had purchaud the busineo.wlth the prior problems Chat it had and hn was trying to change it around. xe commented that there have been no police nparn or fire violations. xe sold De wu given parmLalon tc stay open until 7:00 a.m. by Che Planning Co®iaaion and he did not think St was fair for the Clty to change tts mind. Vice Chairman CDStiu stated that tDe City Council Le above eM Planning Commiuion and can appeal any derision made by the Planning Commie Lan. SDn uid it is the Council's decl^~on that is final and binding owr and above any deeie ions made by the PLnnlnq Commlu ion. Mr. Pellegrino uid ha could not understand why the Council vobd she way cc did because one of the Council Members changed his mind and voted [or Dim the first time but against him the ucond Lime. doe Pebie, 6611 Topaz Street, gaucho Cucamonga, sGbd he had rrLLGn a lnttsr to the Plsnnlnq Commie ion protest inq tM note and disturbance created during laU hours. xe uid he had not prwlausly appeared In parson at any of the hearings becauu hL wife Dad undergone Cancer surgery [ollared by radio[ con and chuot Mrapy let year and Lhty had also felt Sam'• Place should have an opportunity to perlorm under the qu idellno that Dad bwn pusad. Hs ucd he would no[ again pus up an opportunity to report vloiat loos [o tM poi ue ar Planning Commie tan Mlnutu -fir?- liege[ 14, :99 i 3~I tiro department. Ba aid activity hoe gone on way paaC 2:00 a.m. on many occaeione. He acid when it is hot and the tlocra are kept open the music can be hoard all over the neighborhood, which would bs aewptabL during urtain ryours of the day. ~ Be indicated the major problem is CM rowdinaa in the parking lot, the fighu going on in the parking lot, equealinq of tires, and loud vehicle radice playing. He eaid on one oecae ion a woman came out o[ the bar screaming ^call the police^ and hie wife called 913. Be reported the police have bun to tM bar on aweral occaeione. Be felt u a ruLdanC he should ba able to enjoy tRe peace and quiet of the aighborhood and hie home when ha comp home from work. Be saltl he understood that the lights from tN public unnLa sonata Ln neighborhood parka have to be turned off at 10:00 p.m. to avoid distu rbinq Lhe neighbors and he felt eLOilar conditions should be impoesd for a bat which L next door to • neighborhood. Vtce Chaltan Chitin Cioeed the public haring. commisatoar Nelcher stated that she concept Sn today•a aocLty gems to De gnat wMther or not one L going by the ru la book, if you can get away with it, it's okay. Xe fQt 1t moos CM duty oC the PUnninq CcamLeioare to uy that it i^ not okay. Be felt tRe Commiulon wu given a clay signal [tom the City Council that 13:00 p.m. is late enough for the balneu. Ne thought that baud on the wLduce, the Co®lssion should find that iM Conditional Va Permit i^ not bHnq conducted Sn an apprapriaN annsr and suspension ar revocation of the Conditional Uu Permit should W coaid~red. Be [elf the Commin ion should day tM 6niertai:mient Permit becauu oa of CM findings which require denial would G that the preml.ea or eatabliahment is likely to be operated Ln an illegal, improper, ar dleotderly manner, which Re old ie currently Rappenlnq. Mr. xanaon stated that one of the purpous of the hearing tonight wu ea cone ider whether to of for i Martnq the poalble zevoeation or euapeneion of the Conditional Uu Pezmlt. Xe aid In uaenw Ue applicant mould recHve the eontlnance CRac he had requited. Be auggeeted the Co®lolon may vote to set ^ huring to consider twoutLan or aapsnslon antl toot ins the other two applications until Chat tLee. He aid tRat would give the applicant time to Clear up wMther Nry would W potentially moving to another cite. Notion: Moved by Va1leCte to Continue tnteztalmeent Permit 91-03, Conditional Uu Permit 78-03, and Amendment tC Conditional Ua Permit 78-03 for two woke to consider poi iDle aspneion or avocation o[ the Conditional Ua Permic. Mr. Buller stated that it would Cake tour ueeka to allow time for adverttaement. Hr. Hanson stated that public huring mould be ldt open on CN Entertainment Permit and condlt tonal Ua Permit to avoid the Nod to rradvertia chose items. Vice Chairman Chitla reopened the public Rearing. CommLeinner Val lefts amendatl her motion to September 11, 1991. Cooaal winner ToLtoy uconded the motion but indicated M wa^ dlatausd !t had to ns planning Commie ion Mlnuta -~- AuqueC 16, i99: 13S continued far ouch a long period of time. Commissioner Valletta su ggeet ed the Commission give direction to the applicant that they would Like to tea the bueine se operated under the conditions current:y act forth by the Conditional Uee Permit. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COHMISS IONERS: CNITIEA, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE :tOES: COHMISSTONERS: NONE ASSENT: CONMISSTONEftS: NONE AS9TA.Z N: COMMISSTONE RS: MCNIEL -e arried I ANT 90-03 - C OF ECE~ ~O - A public huring to cammant on ha draft environmental impact report prepatad Cor the Etiwanda North 5pec1 is Plan and cancel Plan Amendment 90-038 to prisons approximately fi,840 ru of territory in tM Rancho Cucamonga epherrof-inf luenca to provide r 3,613 •ingb family dwelling unit on 2,673 arras of vacant land, 28 a tea of na ighborhood commercial uea, 4 erhooL, 5 psrke, an equ eatrian c~gter, and pre urvat ion of 4x132 acres of open apace generally located north~Of Highland Avenue (State Route 30 ),~ aouih of the San Bernardino National Fozbt, west c! tN Cicy of Fontana, end cut of Milliken Avanua. (Continued tree July 24, 3991.) ~lVIRONMENTAL ASSESEMENT AND SPHCIFIC PLAN 96-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA - A requut to recommend approval of the Etlwanda Notth specific Plan, pre zoning npproximdely 6,860 acraa of Grcltory Ln the Rancho Cucamonga sphere of inf luenca to provide for 3,613 single family dwelling unite on 2,473 acraa of vacant land, 28 acraa of neighDOrhoad commercial uae, 6 e<hooL, s parka, an equutrian cenGt, and pruervation o[ 4,114 acra• of open apace gsnarally locabd north of N1ghLnd Avanua (State Route 30~, south of the sere BernardLno National Forest, wet of the City a[ Fontana, and ust of Nllllkan Avanua. (Cone inwd from July 24, 1991.) 0. ENVIAONHENTI~ ASSESSILNT AND CENERa?. PLAN AwENDNENT 90-038 - CITY OP MNCHO CVCANONGA - A raquut to LaromMnd app[aval of • General Plan Amendment to provide eoneLbney with tM draft Etlwanda North spacifu Plan, prazoninq approximaNly 6,840 acre of territory In the Rancho Cucamonga sphere of lntluance to pravlda for 3,613 aingl• Camily dwell inq unite on 2,673 acres of vacant land, 28 arras oC nsighDOnc~od comme[c ul uae, 4 eohoola, 5 parka, an equutrian center, and preprvation of 4, 117 acra• of open apace gsnsu lly Lo<atad north of Highland Avenue (SCau Rouc• 30), south of the San Bernartlino Nat tonal Po[sst, wet of the Cicy of coot an a, and eat of Hllliksn Awnue. (COntlnuad from July 24, 1991.1 Che irman McNiel stated that •tatf had raquubd tM !Lama Ds continued co saptember 11, 3991, to allow time to complete tM draft FinU Environment •1 impact Report (EtR). Ha opened the puDl is huring and eked 1[ anyone in cn• audience wiehsd to speak becau0a they would not be a61• to return on Sepomb`[ 11. Planning Commie ion Minute -'~. August 14, :,+ >~ EXHIBIT D " Sept. 11 ,Aug. 14 ,and July 24 , 1991 Commission Stall' Reports cup ~e-a9 CUP 7&0.9 Amend EP 91-d1 cc : eb.. ao. 19D1 i37 CITY OF RAtiCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 11, 1991 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Conm:isa ion FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner EY: Nancy Pon g, Senior Planner SU&lECT: CONDITIONAL USE PEEMIT 70-03 - SAM'S PLACE - The consideration of suspension or re vocatlon of a Conditional Uae Permit allovinq tae operation of a Dar in conjunction with a restaurant located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corer of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-011-66 ihrough 60. CONDITI DNAL USE PERMIT 7R-03 - SAM'S PLACE - A review of compliance with conditions of approval and consideration of suspension or revocation of the Conditional Uee Permit for a restaurant and Dar located in the Neighborhood Co®erclal District at 6620 Carnelian Street, northvest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201- 011-56 through 60. (Continued Erom Auquat 1d, 1991.) AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL VSE PERMIT 70-03 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to extend the hours of operation and amend [he condition of approval prohibiting live entertainment for an existing restaurant and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201- 811-Sfi through 60. (Continued Erom AugUat 14, 1991.) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to conduct live music in conjunction with a restaurant and bar located in the Nei ghbo rhood Commercial District at 6620 Carnelian Street, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Conti Woad from Auquet 14, 1991.) BACKGROUND: On Auquat 94, 1991, the planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the above-deacr iDed items. The Commission concluded the compliance review and directed staff to set a public hearing for the consideration of suspension and/or re vocatlon of the Conditional Uae Permit No• i0-03 and continued the items to this regular meeting. ANALYSIS: At the meeting of Auguef. 1d, 1991, Ne Commission took public teatrmony regarding the applicant's request to extend the hours of operation and condUCt entertainment. There wag One Yeaidlnt Mho objected t0 the nuisance prob isms created by Same Place. The npp li cant, however, did not indicate to the Cosm:isaion whether he will comply with the conditions of approval. Based an the evidence presented in the July 24, 1991 staff reporC and the pu bl x~: to sti mony, the Commission determined that the bus ineee ie not operating in a Wanner co ns LS tent with the conditions of approval ae contained in Conditional Use Permit No. 70-03. SpeciFical ly, the vlo let lone were extending the hoer; of PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE September 11, 1991 Page 2 operation beyond the 11 p•m• limitation and providing live entertainment. The Commission directed staff to set a public hearing to consider suspension and/or revocation of the Conditional Uae Permit for the bar facilLGy. Attached to this report are the draft minutes of the August 16, 1991, meeting and a Resolution to revoke Conditional Uee Permit No• 78-03 for a bar facility. Staff recoamends that the Commission require the use to cease and desist within 30 days. The applicant may continue to operate the res<aurant business with incidental service of beer and vine. Rowever, the bar facility must cease to operate within 30 days. Staff will inform the Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) regarding Ghe revocation of Conditional Use Permit No. 78-03 for the bat facility. with regards to the proposed amendments to the Conditional Uae Permit and the Entertainment Permit as described in the title of this report, the Commission continued these items so that they can be coneldered at the same time. At the August 24, 1991 meeting, the Commission stated that they could not make the findings to approve them. Attached to this report are Resolutions of Denial for the Entertainment Permit No• 91-02 and the Amendments to the Conditional Use Permit No• 78-03. CORRESPONDENCE: The Item for the suepenalon and/o[ re wca Lion of Conditional Uee Permit 78-03 hat been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property hat been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project. The applicant was notified by certified mail. The amendments to Conditional Use Permit No• 78-03 and Entertainment Permit No. 78-0.3 are a continued public hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Staff zecommen de that the Commission review the attached Resolutions for the revocation of Conditional Uae Permit No. 78-03 Eor a bar facility, the Reaolutiona of Denial fo[ Entertainment Permit No. 91-02 and <he amendments tm Conditional Uee Permit No. 78-03• If the Commission concurs, adoption-of the attached Resolutlone would be Sn order. Respectfully Site , , _. ~-/~ ~~ R lr Brad Bulled City Planner BB:NF: mLg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Draft Minutes of August 14, 1991 Commission Meeting Exhibit "B" - August id and July 24, 1991 Staff Report with Attachments Reao Lut ion for Revocation of CUP 78-03 Resolution of Dental for Amendments to CUP 78-03 ReaoLut ion of Denial for EP 91-OZ l ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG9 STAFF REPORT DATE: August 14, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fon q, Senior Planner ~~. SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENR PEAMIT 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to conduct live music in conjunction with a reetaurant and bar Located in the Nei ghbo rhoOd Commercial Diatrici at 6620 Carnelian Sires t, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued Erom July 2d, 1991.) CONDITIONAL USE PEAMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE - A review of compliance with mnditione of approval and consideration of suspension or revocation of the Conditional Uee Permit for a reetaurant and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial DSatrict~at 6620 Carnelian Street, northweat corner of 19th and Carnelian St re eta - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued from July 24, 1991.) AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to extend the hours of operation and amend the condition of approval prohibiting live entertainment for an existing restaurant and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial Oiatrict at 6620 Carnelian Street. northweat corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued from July 24, 1991.) BACRG RO UND: The above des criDed items were continued from the July 26, 1991 meeting to this one because of a lack of quorum. For clan ES Cation, the live coterie inment being provided now (without an approved Enteric inment Permit) mnaiste Of a one-pets on arnuetical guitarist. The app llcant Se requesting an Entertainment Permit for a duet. Attached for your review is Ne July 26, 1991 5taEf Report. Rea ly e e 8r r Cit Plano Be:NF:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - July Z4, 1991 Planning Co®laelon 9teff R¢port Reaolut ion of Denial for Ente rtal nment Permit 91-02 Resolution of Daniel Eor amendments to CUP 78-03 CITY OF RANCHO CliCAIDIONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: July 29, 1991 n To Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission yV4 FROM: Brad Buller, Ci[y Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: - A review Of cosp liance with conditions of approval and consrderation of suspension, revocation, or modification of the Conditional Use Permit for a restaurant and par located in the Neighborhood Commnercial District at b620 Carnelian St rest, no r[hwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-611-66 through 60. (Continued from July 10,1991.1 - A request to conduce live music in conjunction with a restaurant and bar located in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 6620 Carnelian Street, no¢hwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streecs - APN: 201-811-66 through 60. (Continued from July 10, 1991.) - - A request to extend the hours of operation and amend the Condition of Approval prohibiting live entert air~ment for an existing bar and restaurant located In Che Neighborhood Commercial District at 6620 Carnelian St rest, northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian StreeCS - APN: 201- ell-56 through 60. (Continued from July 30, 1991.) AB_cTAeCT~ Thg purpose of this report is three-fold. IG is as follows: A. Conditional U. p 't N Js-0~ Review of compliance with the Conditions of Approval for Sam's Place, apeciEically the hours c, operation, and consideration of evidence for modification, suspension, or revocation of [he Conditional Use Permit. B, pn P ;t N of-0 Review and consideration of accicn on the Entertainment Permit request Eor Sam's Place to conduct rive music consisting of a duet Isinger 6 guitar playe rl from Tuesday through Sunday, 9 p.m. tc 1 a.m. 0. Conte Tonal ~•e Perm ~ N 79-On Amapd~y Review of the reques;a to extend the hours of ope ra ticn and to elimd note the condit:c r. _, approval prohibiting live entertainment, IZ. HA-xC~RoL"'^:.' Tne compliance review, the Entertainment Permit appli cat: :n, and [he amendments to the Conditional Vse Permit (CUPI were continued f. July 10, 1991 to this regular meeting aC the request of the app L:a^•^ :he compliance review comes about because of a complaint received by :ity re ga tding the hours of operation. A routine inspection of sub jec[ business, Sam's place, validated ehe complaint. To date, and :-~ verrfied by the attorney, Mr. John Ma nne rind, cep resent Tng Sam's Piac~, the business is operating beyond the 11 p.m. limitation until 1 or 2 a - in vieiatior, of the Contli ticns of Approval and live entertainment i ... . ofte red Exom 9 p. m. to 1 a.m. witho uC [he benefit of an app: Entertainment Fe rmit. Attached for your cefe re nce is Che May 9, Investigative Report F.y the Ci.ty's Cade Enforcement staff (Exhibit CI PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CLR 78-03 6 EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE NLY 24, 1991 Page 2 :n order for the Comma ssien to assess the CUP's compliance review and the Entertainment Permit, it is important to review the history of this business location, which is briefly outlined below. For more detailed information, please refer to Exhibit "E," a chronology of the history of the business location. In 1905 the Cortmdssion modified the CVP by limiting [he operating hours Co li p. m. and eliminating Che live entertainment use as a result of complaints received fcom the surrounding residents (see Exhibit "C" - Planning Comma ssion Resolution No. 03-i1]A~. This decision was appealed to , and upheld by, the City Council. In May of 1990 the applicant, who bought the business, requested the extension of [he operating hours. The C onrni ssion reviewed the request i.n August of 1990 and deliberated on the issue of whether the hours of operation shoultl be extended and if so, for how rtany days of the week. The Cortmd ssior, finally approved the amendnent allowing the extension of the hours of operation from 11 p.m. to midnight, Sunday through Thursday, and fcom 11 p.m. to 2 a.m. on Friday and Saturday. The Commission also agreetl that the approval was Eor a period of six months subject to their review for any extension. The decisior. of the Conmis si on was timely appealed by two members of the Council. At the November 7, 1990, appeal hearing, the Council deliberated on the issue of compa[ibi lity with the surrounding residences. At the conclusion of the appeal hearing on December 19, 1990, the Council determined that extending the hours of operation would not be appropriate and upheld the appeal. IC was de to cmined the hours of operation should remain from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. far this business. IIZ. ANALYCIS' This section of the report will focus on the Compliance review with options for the Commission to consider, the merits review of the proposed EnCe rta Some n[ Permit, and the related amentlments to the Conditional Vse Permit. Staff suggests Shat the Commission address these issues in the following order: c ro /0-Oa 1. Rev+_nf any l' h f d'r' f Ayy~~ Based on [he Inve stigat ive Report, Sam's P1aC8 is now in non- compliance with the Conditions of Approval limiting the hou cs. StaEF believes chat the routine inspection, investigative Report, and applicant's admission of violation are substantial evidence Co warrant setting a hearing to consider the suspension, revocation, or modification to the CUP. 2, nor inn. £ rh r r c Tne Pla nniny Cortmission, after conducting a nearing, may take one of the Eol lowing actions: a. Find that the CUP is not being conducted in ar. appropriate manner and Chat modifications to conditions ace necessary. RESULTS: This option uou ld allow the Commission W impose such reasonable conditions to correct problems ce qa rdinq [he operation of the business activity. However, the applicant has already tlemonst rated a disregard for conditions. Therefore, staff wov:d cec ommend monitoring the use Eor six-months and reporting back [o the Commis Sion at that time. 1~{L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CVP 78-03 6 EP 91-J2 - SAM'S PLACE JULY 24, 1991 gage 3 b. Find that the CVP is rot being conducted in an appropriate manner and that modifications are not available to mitigate the impacts and, therefore, suspend or revoke the permit which eequi res the operation to cease antl desist an the time allotted by the Cosmdssion. RESULTS: Should the Comm ssion choose to suspentl the CUP, a time period for the suspension should be specified. If the Commission chooses to revoke the CVP, a minimum Cime period to reconsider any new application for the CVP should be specified. In either case, Sam's Place could continue to operate as a restaurant without ente z[ainmen[ or bar (incidental sale of beer and wine only) because Chat is a use permitted by right for this zone. B. Artwnd~nt r~ mP ]8-Oa nx ndinq the h f - t' On May 13, 1991, the applicant submitted a request to extend the hours of operation. In reviewing this application, staff found that the previous request was denied by the City Council on January 2, 1991 (formal adoption of a resolution of denial). The Development Code has a provision stating that no new application fox a CUP far the same oz substantially the same request on the same site shall be filed within one year fcom the tlate o£ denial. Staff contacted the applicant to inform him of this Code provision and suggested that he withdraw the application. The applicant wished to pursue the application as submitted (see June 27, 1991 letter Erom the attorney representing Sam's Place). Based on the above described Code provision, the Planning Commission cannot consider the request legally. The cefore, staff has no alternative but to reccnmend that the Planning Commission deny the request. The fallowing are options for the applicant: a, withdraw the application, that is, the request to extend the hours of operation, ai the public hearing. RESULTS: No action will be needed from the Commission. This option allows the applicant to refile after January 2, 1992. b. Denial by the Planning Conmission of the new application. RESVLTS: The action will be consistent with the provis icn as contained in the Development Code. This option prohibi r.s the applicant fcom re Ei li nq the same application untill of [ec July 24, 1992. In reviewing [he me tits of the Ente trainmen[ Permit applic a[ion, sta Ef found [hat the related CVP has a specific Condition of Approval prohibiting live ente c[ainment (Exhibit C - Resolution No. 93-117A1. Therefore, the applicant has requested an amendment t; r.he CVP to eliminate this condition. 1. P G d A ' The applicant proposes :; have live music consisting of a duet (singer 6 guitar pla ye:` in his bar antl res[au rant, The live entertainment st a:-' Erom 9 p. m. to 1 a.m., Tuesday through Sunday. The peima:y I42 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 78-03 6 EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE JULY 24, 1991 Page 4 199LLe In CeVlewlRQ CRe EnteLLdiRmErtt PC Lm1C 1S Lne compatibility of the use to the surzoun di ng residents. Imnedi ately to the west of the business location are existing single family homes. It was the combination of live entertainment antl long hours of operation into tRe mRrniaq hours by previous owners of previous businesses that led to the disturbances antl problems identified in the past. The City had responded by imposing an 11 p.m. closing time and eliminating the live entertainment back in 1985. Foll ov ing the imposition of the 11 p. m, closing time, the City no longer received complaints from surrounding residents. However, the City recently received a complaint from one of the residents to the wear o£ the business. The ze.s itlent objected Co the loud Ro ise and music and the disturbances that occurred in the parking loc. F' d ah 'ff n,p .tmn ~_ Both CRe Fire and Sheriff's Departments have been contacted for comments. The Fire Department indicated that they foresee no problems with the Entertainment Permit. The Sheriff's Department stated that they have no record of calls for se cvice to the business location since 1989. F indinas• To consider tRe Enter[a iruaent Permit, the Cortmd ssion must hear and determine all the facts and evidence relevant to the applicant and supervisory employees, as cell as the entertainment proposed, including the nature and location of the proposed entertainment. The COnani ssion may deny the permit if it finds and tleteemines any one of the following: a. The conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application would be coot ra cy to the public health, safety, morals, or welEaee. b. The premises or establishment is likely to be ope ra red in an illegal, inkroper, oL disorderly manner. c. The applicant, or any other pe zson associated with him as principal oc past ner or in a position oc capacity involving partial or total control over the conducC o the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has been convicted in any court of romper en: jurisdiction of any offense involving CRe presentation, exhibition, oz pe zfocmance of any obscene show of any kind oz of a felony oc of any crime involving mots: turpitude or has had any approval, pe crtSt, oz license issued in conjunction with the agile of alcohol oc r.Fe p cov isions of entertainment revoked within .. :•~e preceding S yea cs. d. TRat [he granting of the application vould create a public nuisance. e. That the normal operation of the premises weal: interfere vitR the peace and quiet of any su ¢oun ;:nq residential neighborhood. E. The applicant Ras made any false, mill eadinq, f ca udulent statement of mate vial fact in the re~;:::~•: application. 1 ` \ PLANNING COMMISSI GN STAFF REPCRT CDP 78-03 6 EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE JULY 24, 1991 Page 5 4. ~ Conzlneion: Based on the above analysis, staff concluded [hat the business has been operated in an illegal manner, inconsistent with the conditions of approval contained in the CUP, inclutli ng entext ainment without a proper permit. Further, staff found that the p roposetl live entertainment together with the extended hours of operation would be incompatible with the surrounding residents, in that, it interferes with the peace and quiet of the neighborhood. Therefore, staff cannot reconmend apF rove! of Entezt ainnre nt Permit No. 91-02, nor the Conditional Vse Permit amendment to eliminate the Condition of Approval prohibiting live entertainment. IV. COA_PC$pGNDBNCEe Thi9 item hda been advertised in the Inland valley nails Bey I~r_ newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent [o all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. HECOLPIEdD9TS9CL• Staff recommends that the Commission review the evidence and set a hearing to consider suspension oz revocation of Conditional Vse Pe unit No. 79-03. Fu rc he r, staff recommends denial of the amendment to Conditions of App zoval for Conditional Use Pe cmi[ No. 78-03 and Ente c[ainm nt Permit No. 91-02. ZE the Convnisslon di sagzees with staff, other options are available as outlined previously in this zeport. //(Re~~/s~i]pJ]ectfully submitted, Brad Bul er City Planner BB:NF/jEs Attachments: Letter from Applicant dated June 29, 1991 Letter from neighboring resident Exhibit "A" - City Council Resolution No. 91-00'1 Exhibit ^B^ - 12/19/90 and 11!7/90 City Council Minutes Exhibit "C^ - P.C. Resolution No. B3-217 A Exhibit "D^ - 5/9/91 Code Enforcement Investigative Report Exhibit "E" - Chronology of the History of the eualnesa' LCCatien Exhibit "F^ - entertainment Permit 91-02 application Exhibit "G^ - Location Map Exhibit "H^ - Floor Plan Resolution of Denial Eoc Enterta irunen[ Permit No. 91-02 Resolution of Denial foc Amendments [o Conditional Use Pe zmi[ No. 79-03 14S EXHIBIT E " Council Resolution No. 91-007 Commission Resolution No. 83-117A CUP 78-03 CUP 7&03 Amend EP 91-OZ cc : riav. zo, t991 lye RESOLUTION N0. 83-117-A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'JCAMONG.A, CALIFORNIA, MODIFY I4G CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 FOR THE BAR AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES WITHIN THE BOARS HEAD ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED IN THE RANCHO PLAZA, qT THE NORTHNEST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND CARNELIAN WHEREAS, on the 10th day of duly, 1985, the Ptann ing Commission determined a need to modify Conditional Use Permit 78-03; and, WHEREAS, on the 10th day of July, 1985, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above item. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga resolves as follows: SECTION 1: Additional conditions and changes are found to be needed for Condition Use Permit 78-03 in order to comply with the intent and purposes of the neighborhood commercial shopping district. Therefore, the following conditions are added to those conditions already in effect per Resolutions 76-40, 62-98, and 63-117: 1. The hours of operation shall 6e from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. That entertainment uses in conJunction with this business shall 6e eliminated. 3. This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed annually by the Planning Commission. 4. This approval is granted for a restaurant with the incidential serving of alcoholic beverages. A lunch and dinner menu shall be served to maintain the primary restaurant use. APPROVED AND ADOPTED 7H15 24th DAY OF JULY, 1985, ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A s cX~e~r c ~~-, I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Gommiss ion of the City of Rancho C ut among a, do hereby Certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of July, 1985, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHIT IEA, MCNIEL, BARKER, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL 1 lD RE90LUfION N0. 91-007 A REA1Il1f1CN OF THE CITY CUlR4CII. OF 2RE CiTy OF RANCHO CUCAKN(,A, CAi.IFLYddlA, DENYII4G 1f~ AMENQ~Q~NI' TO WNDTITONAL LSE PER4T ND. 78-0J fCYi AN EXISPING BAR/RESPA[IItAM', SAM'S PEACE, LOCATED AT THE NOR114dFST NRNER OF 19'W A!ID CAId7FL7AN SI1tEE1'$ III THE NEIGIID[H3p00 CCI2~2CIAL DZSiRICf, AND MAICR7G FIIrDINGS IN SUPPOftf TfII~REOF - AFN: 201-Ell-56, 58, 59, AND 60. A. Recitals, (i) Sam's Plate, Iuanne R. Pellegrim, has filed an applicatirn for the amendment to Ctrditiorul Use Permit No. 78-03 as described in the title of this Revolutirn. Rr+*Di.,.rter in this Revolutirn, the subject Crnditional Use Permit request is referzed to as "the applimtirn". (ii) On the 2214 day of August 1990, the Planning ~missirn of the City of Randy Cu®oonga a'x;~x:ted a duly mtioed public hear' application and concluded said hearing on September 12, 1990. 'If;e fin.";== ~ conditionally adopted its Resolutirn No. 90-111, ap{avving. the atm~eent ard extesditg the haws of operation. (iii) the decision represented by said Planning man; pion Revolution was timely appealed to this cb;scil. (iv) on November 7, 1990, the City Qamcil of the City of Randy ayanyrga conducted a duly mooed Public Rearing and oontirated it to Deoanbrs 5, 1990. The City Coumll excluded said hearing rn Deo®ber 19, 1990. (v) All legal ona,~,; sites prim to the adoptirn of this Resolution have oewrred. B• L+~esolutirn. NON', Tf~E, ttr City Czisyil oP the City oP Randn Cucamxga does harnlry find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This ctxacil hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resr'•ttirn are true and cort+ect. 2. Based upon s•~~•~.,r;al evidence presented to this Cbutcil during the above-refer~enoed public hearings imluditg written std ot-al staff reports, together with public testimony, this pamcil hereby specifically finds as follws: (a) the applicatirn applies to property logted at the mrth- west corner of 19th Street and Carnelian with a atr+aet frontage of 1, oJ7 feet and lot depth of 240 feet arci is ~'esently inproved with a shopping center; arrl 1 -l Resolution tb. 91-007 Pdge 2 (b) 1Yfe property to the north of the subject site is a future freeway, the property to the south is an e:nstufg shopping center, the property tv the east is an eftista.ng shopping curter, and the property to the west is existing single family residenfce,. (c) "-he Pry ameJdme_~ wnteaplate9 eXTPrf:lnng the haws of operation to wircide with those established by the applicant's alwholic wntrol license; That is, from the aazent closing has of 11:00 p.m. to a new closing has of 2:00 a.m., lwrday throw Saturday. (d) 'lhe ascent limitation on boos of operation to 11:00 p.m. was established as a direct result of a histary of public safety and public nuisance problems associated with this location. (e) 'ITfe forcer problems have not emoted sirce the entailment of the hags to 11:00 p.m. acd the elimination of related entertainment. (f) 'Rfe ext~ion of bouts of aparaiion ~y be detrimental to the auzapding single family teaidenwes because of their close orcnximity and because of the ~ttse of bar facilities. (g) Tfie extensirn of twins of operation fOr a bar facili would to inmmatibile with the saxaadvfg tesidaftfal area. ~ 3. Bd.Sed upon the substantial evidence pt+easited to this Caasil darug the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific fitditgs of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this C®issirn trerebn' fitds and mfclydes as follows: (a) That the proposed use 18 not in award with the cesferal Plan, the objecrtives of the Developmelft CUde, and the pugwers of the district in whidf the site is located, (b) that the prq~osed use, togettfer with the ovditions lio- able ttfGreio, will he detrimental to fife public tfealth, safety, ar welfare ar materially injuriafa to ptopmties ar i>m¢ovemafts in the vicinity. 1, 2, ard40 above, this cUSfci~ and wrclueiors met forth in paragraphs tlse Permit 78-07 ear the mcterfei~tq~~i ~~~t to the Ctrditional 5. 'Rile aaawil MzebY prwidee rfotia to Sam's Place, L.fanne R. Pellegrino, ttfet the time witifin Nsidf judicial review of the decision represented by thla Rusolution must ba eou}tt L goverfed by the prwisiore of California Ct~de of Civil Ptooediae Section 109.6. 6. the City Clerk of the City of Randfo Cucmeorga is tferety directed to (a) certify. to the adoption of thin Resolution; ofd (b) forthwith transit a certified mpy of this Resolution, by omctified mail, return - receipt regfesked, to Sam's Place, 1'lfafvfe R. Pellegrim, at tlfe address identified in city zewcds. ~S~ PESOlution No. 91-007 Page 3 PASSED, APPR7VID, and ADOPPFD this 2nd day of January, 1991. AYES: ~ Ale~mrdrs, Baguet, Stint, Williams, Wright HOES: Nme ABSENP: None Dennis L. Stout, Mayor A7TF9f: l J. Adam ,City Clerk I, DFHRA J. AfYtS, CTTY CLFIaC of the city of Pardn 47ramorga, California, do hereby aaztify that the far'egoing Resolutim was duly passed, approved, and adopted tN the City Council of the City of ~n Cucmmrga, California, at a regular meetitq of said City Council held on the 2ttd day of January, 1991. Ekea[ted this 3rd day oP JaiiLlry, 1991 at PdllrtlD Cucanvcp, California. J. ,City Clerk 151 EXHIBIT F " Commission Resolution Nos. 91-131, 91-132 and 91-133 CUP 7B-09 CUP ~&03 Nnetd EP 91.09 cc : rlo.. so. 1991 t 5 Z- RESOLUTION NO. 91-i31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 70-03 TO EXTEN- THE HOURS OF OPERATION ANO TO ELIMINATE THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL PROHIBITING LIVE ENTERTAINMENT FOR AN E%IBTING BAR AN- RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMEhCIAL DISTRICT, ANO MAEING FINDINGS IN EVPPOAT THEREOP - APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH 60. A. Aecit ale. (i) Sohn Mannerino, on behalf of Sam Pellegrino, has filed a petition to modify the conditions cE approval for Conditional Dee Permit No. 78-03 ae described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Reaolut ion, the subject Conditional Uee Permit requaet ie refereed to as ^t he application." (ii) On the 10th day of July 1991 and continued to the 24th day of July and the 16th day of August 1991, the Planning Commies ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public henring on the application and continued that hearing to she September 11, 1991, meeting. (iii) On the 11th day of September 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga received public testimony and concluded said Rearing on that data. (iv) AL1 legal prerequis it ee prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Reao ution. NoW, THEREFORE, it is Aereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Comm iee ion of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga ae follows: 1, This Commission hereby specifi<aLly finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of th ie Resolution are true and correct. 2. eased upon substantial evidence prseented to this Commiaeian during the above-referenced public hearings, including wrf tten and oral et aff reports together with public testimony, thLe Commies ion hereby epecif ically finds as follows: (a) Tha appllcat ion nppliee to property located at the no rihwes[ corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets with a etrebt frontage of 1,037 feet and lot depth of 240 feet and ie present ly improved with a shopping center. (b) The property Go the north of the subject Bite ie a future freeway, the property to the south ie an ex iet ing shopping center, the property to the east ie an existing shopping center, and the property to the west ie existing single femily residences. ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. >i -L3. CUP 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE September 11, 1991 Page 2 (c) The proposed amendment contemplates extentling the hours of operation to coincide with those setae liehed by the applicant's alcoholic beverage control license; that ie, from the current cloe ing hours of 11:00 p.m. to a new closing hour of 2:00 a.m., Monday through Saturday; and elim in at inq the conditions of approval prohibiting live entertainment. (d) The applicant filed the soma application eo extend the hours of operation on May 22, 1990, and the application was denied on appeal by City Council on January 2, 1991, by adoption of their Aesolut ion No. 91-007. (e) The Development Code, Section 17.04.030H, eC etas that following the denial or revocation of a Conditional Uee Permit application, no application for a Conditional Uee Permit for the same or eubetant lolly the same use of the same or 9ubetantial ly the same site shall be filed within one year from the data of denial or revocation. (f) The applicant nee bean operating Lhs bueinee• beyond the 11:00 p.m. limit et ion and offeced live entertainment in violation cf the conditions of approval and in violation of Ordinance No. 290 pertaining to Entertainment Permits. (g) The current limitation on hours of operation to 11:00 p.m. was eeta6liehed ee a direct zeeuli of a history of public safety and public nu iaanca problems aeeociated with this location. (h) Tha former problems hew not occurred since the curtailment of the noure to 11:00 p.m. ahtl the slimiest ion of celated live entertainment. (i~ The extension of noura of opazation together with the live entertainment may be detrimental io Che surrounding single family ree idences because of their clone proximity and because of the natuze of bar fat lilt le e. (j) The sxtena ion of hout• of operation togathac with the live entertainment would be incompet ibla with the surrounding reeidentiel area. 3. Beeetl upon the sub st anG iel ev ids n<e pruentsd to thL Commission during the above-refsrencetl pub lie hesrings end upon the epscif lc fintl legs of Eacte set torth in paragraphs 1 end 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conc ludeB ae follows: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with Che Gene zal Plan, the objectives of the Oeve lopment Coda, end the purposes of the district in which the alto ie located. (b) That the proposed use will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injuz iou• to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ~sy PLANNING COMMISSION AESOLUT ION NO. 91-131 CUP 78-03 - SAH'S PLACE September 11, 1991 Page 3 4. eased upon the findings and cone lueions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commies ion hereby denies the reque et to amend the Conditional Use Permit No. 78-03 for the extension of hours oC operation and the elimination of the conditions of approval prohibiiing live entertainment. All conditions of approval conca fined in City Council Aeaolut ion No. 91-007 shall remain in full farce and affect. 5. The Secretary to this Comm iseion shall ca rt ify to the adoption of this Reaolut ion. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Sectatery of the Planning Conro iaaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, paesetl, and adopted by the Planning COmmiseion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeiinq of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of September 1997, by the following vois-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHI TI EA, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISS IONEAS: MELCHER ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL ICJ RESOLUTION NO. 91-132 A AESOLVTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 91-02, A AEQVEST TO CONDVCT LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJVNCT ION WITH A BAR AND RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNEA OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD CO[4fEACTAL DISTRICT, AND MAXING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEAEOP - APN: 201-811-6fi THROUGH 60. A. Rylc Ltale (i) John Mannerino, on behalf of Sam Pellegrino, hoe filed an application for an Entertainment Permit No. 91-02 ae described in the title of this Reeo luL ion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, eha subject Entertainment Permit request ie referred to ae "the application." (ii) On the 10th day of July 1991 end continued to the 24th dey cE Su1y artd the 14th day of August 1991, the Plsnnin9 Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued thae hearing to the September 11, 1991, meeting. (iii) On the 11th day of September 1991, Lhe Planning Comanis•ian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga received public testimony artd cant hided aaitl hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the aaopi ion of this Aeeo lotion have occurred. e. Reeolut ion. NOW, THEAEFOAB, the Planning Commission of the City or Rancho cucamonga dose hereby find, determine, and casolvs as follower ' 1. This Commission hereby epaeif ically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Roc it ale, Part Ar of thi• Resolution ate true antl correct. 2. eased upon suhetsntial evidence presented to th ie commission during Che above-ceferencad public hearings, inc ludLng written end oral staff repasts together with public testimony, this Commission hereby epecif is ally Einde ae follows: (a) Ths application applies to property located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets with a attest frontage of 1,037 feet and lot depth of 240 feet and is pceeantly improved with a chopping center; and (b) The property to the nocth of tM subject Bite i• a future freeway, tM property to the south Ls an ax lsting shopping center, Lne property to the east Se an ex lsting shopping center, and the property <o cn• west ie existing single family residences. 'J~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 91-132 EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE September 11, 1991 Page 2 (c) The applicant hoe been operating the bueineae beyond the 11:00 p.m. limitation and offered live entertainment in violation of the conditions of approval ae contained in Aeeolut ion Noa. 83-117 and 91-007 Eor Conditional Vee Permit No. ]8-03 and ordinance No. 290 pertaining to Entertainment P¢Ymit e. (d) Tha City received a written complaint in June of 1991 objecting to the let enee• of the hours of operation and thz live entertainment. (e) The current limitation on hours of operation to 11:00 p.m. and the elimination of live entertainment were eatabliehed ae a direct result of a history of public eatery and public nuisance problems aeaociat ed with this location. (f) Tha former problems have not occurred si nca the curtailment OE the hours to 11:00 p.m. and the •limina<ion of livo entertainment. (g) Tha extension of hours of operation together with Live entertainment may be detrimental to the surrounding single family residences bec au ee of chair close proximity end Dacau se of the nature of bar facilities. (h) Tha extene ion of hour of opsrat ion icgethsr with live entertainment for a bar [aciliiy would be incompatible with the surrounding residential area. _ 3. 9aeed upon eubstantial evltlenee presented to this commies ion during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragrnphe 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby Eirds and concludes ae follows: (a) The conduct of the establiehmant or the granting of the application would be contrary to the public heslth, safety, morals, or welfare) and (b) Tha ptamises or establishment i• likely io be operated in an illegal, improper, or diaordstly manner; and nuisance; and (c) That grant Lng the appllcat ion would create a public (d) That the normal operation of [ha premises would interfere with the pease and quiet of the surrounding eeeident ial neighborhood. 4. Based upon the findLngs and cone Lusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, thi• Commission Nnby daniu Enterta inm¢nt Permit No. 91-02. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ?i -13 _' EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE S ept embeY 11, 1991 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA f~' Y • ~C~~fJ Suzann C ea, Vice Chairman ATTEST: /Bra Bul cre ry I, Bzad Buller, Secretory of the Plnnnlnq Commau ion of the City of Ranc hp Cucamonga, do hereby certify ehnt the toagoing Aeeolution wee duly and regularly introduced, paeoed, end atlopted by the P1annSnq Cananlae ion of the City of Rnncho Cucamonga, at a regular maeting of the Planning Commleeion held on the 11th day of Smptember 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITI EA, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MF.LCNER ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOL STOY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL ~~ RESOLUTION NO. 91-133 A RESOLUTION OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FOAN IA, REVOAING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 79-03 FOA "SAN'S PLACE", A BAR PACILITY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NE IGNBOIiH000 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAMING FIND INCS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-511-56 TNAOVGH 60. A. Recitals. (i) On the 27th day of Oecembar 1978 the City of Rancho Cucamonga appiovad Conditional Vee Pezmlt 78-03 fot a restaurant with related bar facilities and musical entertainment permitting hours of oparat ion from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m- On the 10th day of July 1985 the City of Rancho Cucamonga modified Cond it LOnal Ues Permit 78-03 to restrict the hours to Ii: 00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and eliminate the ptavte ion toY entertainment at the facility. (ii) On Che 10th day of July 1991 and continued to the 24th day of July and the 14th day of Auquat 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the compliance review of Conditional Vse Permit No. 78-03. (iii) On 14th day of August 1991, the Planning Commiecion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga received public teatLmony and concluded Bald compliance hearing on chat data and of a new publLc Marinq on September 11, 1991 for the conetderatian o[ a suspension and/or tsvoution of Condit tonal use Permit Na. 78-03. (iv) On September 11, 1991, the Planning Conn iaeion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga concluded Bald hearing. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. e. Resolution. NON, TNEAEPOFtE, the Planning Commiu ion of the City or Rancho Cucamonga dw• hereby find, determine, and resolve ea follows: 1. This Commlu ion hereby specifically finds the[ ell of the facto set forth In the RecLtal e, Part A, of this Reeolut ion ere true and correct. 2. Basetl upon aubstant ial evldenw presented to this Commiee:on during the above-re Eerencsd public haeringe, including written and oral etaf[ report e, together with publLc testimony, thte Commiuion hereby specifically finds ae followr. (a) The bu[inu• location L et the northwest cornet of 19th and carnelian Streat• with a street frontage of 1,037 feet and tat depth of 24G feet and ie presently improved with a shopping center. I5~ PLANNZNG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91 -i 33 COP 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE September 1„ iiii Page 2 (b) Tha property to the north of the subject sits Le a future freeway, the properiy to the south ie an axieting shopping center, the property to the east ie an axiating shopping center, and the property tc the west is existing single famLly reeidencee. (c) The owner has raquaeted an amendment to extend the hours of operation to coincide with thou aetablished by the appl icant'a alcoholic beverage control licenee; that ia, from the current eloeing hours of 11:00 p. m. to a new eloeing hour of 2:00 e.m., Monday through Saturday; end eliminating the Condit ion• of approval prohibiting live entertainment. Concurrently with the revocation reuse thi• Planning ConmieeLon has denied such modif Stet ion reque et. (d) The owner filed the same application to exCend the hmure of operaiion on Nay 2:, 1990, and the applicai ion was denied on appeal by Clty Council on January Z, 1991 by adoption of their Reeolutlon No. 91-007. (e) The current limitation on hours of operation to 11:00 p.m, and the ellminatian of live /nGrtainment were eelabliehed m a direct ze/ult of a history of public eatery and publle nu seance problem/ ueociated with this location. (f) The former prableme have not occurred since the curtailment of the hours to 31:00 p.m• and the ellminatlon of live mbrtainm/nt. (g) The owner hu been operating the 6uelno• beyond the 11:00 p.m. limitation and offered live entertainment in violation of tM condlt Lon• of approval a• coot ainetl in Reeolutlon• No. 83-117, R3-117-Ar and 91-007 for Conditional Ve• Permit No. 78-03 and Ordinance No. X90 pertnining to Entertainment Permit/. (h) The Clty received a written complaint in dune of 1991 obj eciing to the budnes• operation, epecitically the hour of operation and the live entertainment. (1) Such hours o[ operas ion heyond 11:00 p.m. together with live entertainment i/ detrimental to tM eurroundlnq •ingl• family n/idence bee sues of LMir clou proximity end beceuN of the nature of Der facllitlu. (j) Such hours of aperat ion beyontl 13:00 p,m. together with live entertainment for a bar [ecillty L Lncompatible with the eurroundlnq reddential area. 3. Baeed upon aubetantial evidence psenbd to LDL Camnluion during the above-referenced pu6l is huring• and upon the epecitic tinding• of facts set forth in paregraph^ 1 and 3 above, !hL CommL•ion hereby Elnd• and conclude a• follows: `~~ PLANNING COMHISSION RESOLUTION NO. 9i-133 CUP 78-03 - SAH'S PLACE September il, 1991 Page 3 (a) The Conditional Uae Permit ie not being tondutted In an appropriate manner and modifieat io ne ate not available to mitigate the imparts. Therefore, thtr permit shoo ltl be revoked which requires Che operation to cease and desist in the time allotted by the Commission. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 aDOVa, this Cammieeion hereby revokes Conditional Use Permit No. 78-03 and the use shall cease and desist within 30 days from the date of the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE(/~C/I~~TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~S ULanna .~ , VS e ATTEST: ec Bu r, Lacy I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Plann inq Commie lon of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cart lfy that the foragoing Reoolution wa^ duly and regularly introduced, peed, and edopud by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular maatln9 0( the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of September 1991, by Che followlnq vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ABSTAIN: COMM/S5I ONERS: MCNI EL, MELCHER l ~ I EXHIBIT G " cuP 7e-a3 CHRONOLOGY FOR THE HIS'lY)12Y OF THE BUSINESS LOCATION SAM'S PLACE On December 27, 1978, the Pkuurtng Commissfon condltlonally approved [he Boaz's Head restaurant with bar and mtertalnment. Due to consistent complaints relating to noise, loud music, fights, and loitering, the Plazmm~ Commisslon had reviewed [he Condllional Use Permit several times and modified the conditions of approval to mtllgate these problems. Some of [he mttlgatlon measures added were limited hours of operation to 2 a.m., structural changes to 6uIIer noise, and lnstallatlon of speed bumps within the shopping center. In 1983, [he Planning Commission again reviewed this Condlttonal Usc Permit due [o complaints received and modified [he conditions of approval through more restnetrie hours of operation ( 11 p.m. closing 1, additional noise attenuating materials to redutt exterior and interior noise and required lmplemenmtlon of a dinner menu. On November 16, 1983, the Clty Council heard an appeal by the appUCant and reinstated the 2 a.m. closing time. [n 1985, the Planning Commisslon again reviewed and modNed the Condltlonal Use Permit by keeping the operatUy( hours to 11 p.m„ and ellminating [hc live entertainment use. On September 8 1985, Ute City CouncU heard an appeal by the applicant and upheld the deelsWn of the Planting ComnrLSSlon. In April of 1988, the Boaz's Head closed due to fire damage The business was reopened as Stmttons under dlQerent ownership, No complaints were receried during the period that Strattons was open. In March of 1990, the applicant, Sam & Luanne Pellegrino, took over the business of Slmttons and renamed 1[ Sam's Place. On May 22, 1990, the applicant submitted a request to extend the hours oC opemtton. On August 22, 1990, the Commission reviewed the request. The Commisslon deliberated on the Issue of whether the hours of opemtlon should tx extended and U so, for how many days of the week The Commission finally approved the amendment allowing the extension of hours of operation from 11 p.m. to mldmQ~Cht Sunday through Thursday .and tram 11 p.m. to 2 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The Comnllsslon also agreed that the approval was (or a period of six months sub ect to their review for any extension. The approval was formallud at the September ~2. 1990 meeting. The decision of the Commisslon was timely appealed by two members of the Council, On November 7, 1990, the Coune9 heard the appptai. 1'he Counetl deliberated on the issue of compatlbWty with the surrounding residences. Dve to a deadlocked 2:2 tie vote. the CouncU continued the hearing to December 5th regular meeting. On December 5, 1990, the Councll again continued the hearl~~t to December l9, I990 , at the request of the applicant. On December l9, 1990, tfie CouncU concluded the hearing and determined that extending the hours of operation would not be appropriate. The CouncU formalize the decision by adopting a resolution upholding the appeal on January 2, 1991. On May 8, 1991, Code Enforcement Staff conducted a routine Inspection of the business for compliance review. The business Is operating beyond the it p. m. Ihnitatlon to I or 2 a.m, on regular basis and Itve entertainment Is o(tered from 9 a..m. to l.a.m. On May 13, 1991, the applicant submitted the EnlertaWnent Permll applicztlon IEP 91-021. I~ CHRONOLOGY • SAM"S PLACE (Cont.) On Mayy 24, 1991, Staff send a letter [o the applicant infotming him of the incompleteness status. On May 28. 1991. additional Intormahon were submitted. Staff determined the application to be complete . On June 10, 1991, the applicant submitted the amendment to [hc CUP to request for an extension of hours of operation. 17h1s same day, staff set the 7-30-91 Comnnsslon agenda), On June 17, 1991, staff verbalty Wormed one of the staff member at the attorney's othcc for the applicant that the amrndment to the CUP to extend the hours of opcratinn cannot 6e re(lled within one year of dental, which R the cast for Sam's Place. Staff suggested that the applicant wtthdraw tram the amendment appllcatlon and a Lull refund would be retvme One June 24, 1991. staff again contacted the a[tomey's olflce to lYnd out V the apphcant deslrcd to withdraw .Staff also nYOrmed her that an amendment to the CUP to eliminate the condRlon of approval prohlbJtlng hue entertalnIDrn[ would be needed in oNer For the Commission to consider the Entertalrmient Pcrmlt 91-02. The Comrmssion has 2 options, either Berry the EP 91.02 or continue ft to the same date that the amendment to CtJP was being advertised for. The Compliance review, the amendments to the CUP and the Entertainment PemUt were scheduled for Ju)y ]0 .1991 Cornmisslon meet At the request of the applicant, the COInn119Slan continued the Items to the J~ 24th meeting. Due to a lack of quorum, these Items wen again continued to the August 14, 1991 meeting. On August 14. 1991, the Commission conducted a public hearing to review the ~ompdance o[ the 6uslnesa with the condltlons of approval as contained m the CUP 78.03. The Commission also considered the related amendments to the CUP , requesting for an extension of hours of operation and ellrmnating a condition of approval prohibiting We entertainmrnt ,and the Entertainmrnt PerrNt 91-02. The Commissmn deternnned that me business is nat operating m a manner consistent with the condnfons of approval as contained m Commfssbn Resolution No. 83-117A and Conned Resolution No, 91-007. The Commission directed ata6 to sat public hearing for consideratlon of revocation of the CUP at the September 11, 1991 meeting and continued the related items to the same meeting so that all the Items could be considered at one Ilene. On September I1, 1991. the Commission revoked the CUP 78-03 for a bar faclllty and denied the amendments to the CUP 78-03 for the rreeqquest to extend the hours of operaton and to eliminate a condition of approval prohlbltlng INe entertainment and the Entertainment Permit 91-t>2. ¢ ~ l~3 - -- M r}y S GUGLIO L i W ~y/ O F F I C E 6 JOMNC MANNERINO SAS 3R'~GJG,'0 September 11, 1991 HAND DELIVERED Commissioner Chitiea -RECEIVED - Commissioner McNiel CITY OF FANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION Commissioner Melchez commissioner Tolstoy ~ SEP 111991 Commissioner Valletta CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSIOit- ~ ~-n,. ,,-- n,~ , 10500 Civic Center Drive .R i~1~L~91~1~ Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 - - --: t Re: Sam's Place '. Dear Commissioners: _~ ~ ' At the request of our clrienta, Mtr azs ' a suboitEing•t}r attached petitions on their behalf. ~ ,:;.~, . ,,.~ , • Very t my yours, ~ .~ k~_ ~"S~ ~• c : n .. . ~,~, .. , MA IN 6 BRIGUGL 0 ~ ~: " ,.. ~; z ~" .. ~ Ey 1Gil2~L _ ,. ~ :.~;:; JD ~ j .im,~"~.~;1 ,,; Enclosures -. M '~"~~ ° :' r , ' :;~...~ .:~: EXHIBIT H " 9333 BASELINE 90AD, SMITE 110 / AANCNO CUCAMONGA G~1917J0 / IEL 171q 9901100 / FA%0111 9A~ 860 $eptemuer Ll, 1991 Page ~_~ T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See tadersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE / WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/OR CUSTVYffAS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN ~ ~- STREET, RANCHO CUCAMDNCr1, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE TF1E LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS ZMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY, WE WOULD LIRE TO SPATE 'THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 ND LESS) IS SWNTID, DISCRII4NA10RY AND UN- AN ET.)[TII TABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRCIOR PROHLFI~6 DDFSBNOT JfISTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PIDPLE ARE PRSS[R49 TM>cK1CENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREEtHLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS HIASID AND UNFOUNDID. o.snr.xi tianw Siunature Address C,1.~. ~,> I ~r~ .,,, n ,. ,C~~li' 1~'lil~ ~~/ ~ /~~ ; ~fi.~t't ls,;_ ~~l =.-~~~/"`~.. ..,./ice . ~'"~. ~ '•~! .~'~ `%? -~',, fiL~.t., .>. `"' ~i S ~ t 1' /~" ~, • ~~s' p~ S-C t-~ ..~~~L- . c,v2r.- Q r ~G CJ.n Lt p / , '/ _ O p ' ~ I ~J ~ n~ i l_Lti R f~'1 ~ ~yr,,. : ~ ~~._ ' ~ ~. Septasoer 11, 1991 Pa ge __ T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See uxdersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CAFNE[.IAN STREET, RANCFK) C[R:AMDNGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LII4TATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF TME COMEIJNITY, WE iAIJI,D LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BifS1NES5 FOR TED; ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS S[.ANTID, DISCR]MINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTZONAL. 7'0 LIMTT Tf[E RIGfIPS OF PEOPLE TO BENEPTT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLQIS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A Dt2ACRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRE511EII•9 INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASR TTiAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIFJd A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, ffilD TODAY IS B]'ASID AED UNFOUNDID. i.~Prin[ed Name c~ L,n.~t F: ~ , a° /_ _~' I ~. i ,r n y -bR ~- ~ / Jld,.eL'lik' PJ 8~ 3 r S ~ 1 ~ (~ a ,Y Signature Address 1V h.^,~ •,, ...\r.~.r~r ~l q,rf .~ r1.~ U 1c Y C11`r ~~ ~~ ~. ~~ :w '..~ i ) //i C September 11, 1991 Page ~{ dY~ylt~ NYCn T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga Fii+i~ '~~•~, FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE NR THE UNDERSICx1ID ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONCrI, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS It~OSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMMJNITY, WE FKRII,D LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PI70PLE TO BII~FTT FROM EARNING AN SUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEIRS DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DIIIJCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESllMID INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF'AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIR YEARS AGO WAS NSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASED AND [RiFY)UNDID. Printed Name ~ ,Signature i r Address __,~,I e ~ [ i ~n A n, ~ fir trCrw .-rl o-sr l r,.l r iC-c .v..l'~ , R_ _ _ ._ _ . (~ . ~ . I 'n.' <l. [~'~C W %) o ~y~ru~r~/~~ l(o~ September 11, 1991 T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE Page WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIEPIDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCFp CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS 1}Q: CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE CGMMUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITi1DE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 ND LESS) IS SIAM'®, DISCRTPIINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS' OF PEOPLE TO HETJEFIT FROM EARNING AN EY)[JITABLE LNING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLFD6 DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY APB) THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YGU CAREFULLY REVI~i A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID AND UNFOUNDED. Printed Name Signature Address _~ ~ ~ e- ~ ~/ f~~ /'i /+lril' l~v Septembet 11, 1991 10: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE Page WE THE UNDIILSIGN® ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOI4~R_S OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREEI, RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE TME LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF 17$3 COI4UNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A $USINFSS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SIANf®, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMiT THE RIGHFS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCINI FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIED, BVI TDDAY IS BIASED AND U[iF'OUNDID. Printed Name Si~ature Address {~ 1 iG'~ M1.h lI ~P Cl~~cr1 ~ ~~11:,.r~ ~.iz~ ~~.+_. _ ~~ li I"d.r' t i ~,yt ...., i ~~ er~..~ ~,> F6.i'/ ~. r,, tcf~" ~~_Llo,~lir.! ~u','.YI ~. ~~~'1I~~'. f1.'„ .r 1 , ~._'f~l ~~.. I)~l .i-`.' " . ~!~-Cic'.-)''!M:+~, ~ -~~ - rnn L~~,i_ 1,1, r. I /• I ~ ~./C K. ~ ~}. :/~'Z i7 1)) ' ~>~-!`.Zn~r: 1 C?c t u r~ l[ rc°ii' r_ ~41v~ r' .- ~ / i ~ . ~ I1 September 11, 1991 -1 Page T0: city of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE w'E '1HE UNDERSIQdED ARE FRIENDS AND/OR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREEI, RAC CUCAMDIK.A, CA. WE STRONG[.Y OPPOSE 1103 LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IIfl OSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OHNE[!S AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMIJNITY, WE WOIJID LIKE TO STATE 7IiE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IPI ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OIiNPltS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DIBCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTIIVTIONAL. TO LII'ffT THE RIGHfS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN ''..QUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT NSIIFY THE PHILOSOPHY 1HAT WE ARE A DETUCRACY AND THAT PIDDLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, NIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASR THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEH A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO HAS JUSIIFIID, 8UI TODAY IS BL95ID AND UNFOVNDID. Printeri Name Siglature Address' / 1 i .- ~!~ <` -~.~T~-iii ~:'~rcn l_.1 .~-cr~ ' ~z~l -~irt;~:: C'~.'~ , - , ~,jl}I ~ i11.J. ._~'~li ,. 'I/r t_.:~1a /:. '3 ." ~r`~n5~::.'f - , ' ~' Ir'/:~._'- ~ /_ 1 f~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 I^I 1 1 ~ ~~,(~ r_I .~ 1 . Y l ; Ir_.Lkfc,l-b~J11~~~ I ~t 1'~ (~/_.1 ~/ y ~~ ~/ ~ 111• E.j'i 'I ._. ,' -. '~`1 l~,Si~~`/ '~r-11• i`I i lL•~~,~'. l: - ,.. ~ ~ ._ 1. . ~ ~'C-; ~i/_ ~~i "~~'i ~c;7 ,- ~/ /-~ l i.','~,~~1 ..Lki/I ~~ i, ~' ; c, r,:" .~s'~il ,i', 'ri ~ to ~ .. /;;~~ :'~J / ~~' ~... _ ~ ~. ~ZiJ~ ~ ~ / "'~br% (5'%'~'•Y•iN /'~7' J l ' ~ pt i ~ ~- rl , - `~`I..r,' Ill l`\~ .~\Y ~ : 1 \';1'rli,, 3'.';~ ,J.;• ~~p ,i ., Septeicber 11, 1991 Page 1b; City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONC',A, CA. HE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY, WE WOl1I.D LIKE TO STATE ~THEVAITTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME 12•I ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF ' OUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANT®, DISCRII•D:NATORY h"ID UN- ICDNSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGFITS OF PEOPLE TO BEiJEFIT FROM EARNING EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBIkMS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE LOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMID INNOCENT `'°~diE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU cepRxln.i.Y REVIEW A L'~ 'flECISION THAT SZX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIED, BUT TODAY IS BIASED AND UNFOUNDID. Printed Name Signature Address -~ _ , 1 ~. n : /; r / ~ .~/.J - ~,, ,, ~ ~ ~ ] ~,./.l ~~'-r/fin] ,h'b~I' /JV' ..1~' ;"~ ?' i .7 ; jll-fp ~. ~~. , .,.<!~>r 1 L Septertmber 11, 1991 Page T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE LT]DERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/OR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMDN(.A, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIFIITATION OF }TOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMIINITY, WE {A)OID LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SI.AN1'®, DISCRII~@IAT(MY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN ~ TABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NDT .IUSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AEID THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMID INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAPF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO NAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BLASID AND UNFWFIDID. l (2 Printed Name Signature Address September 11, 1991 Page T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNID AAE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMDNCA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE TME ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF ~m,? PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANT®, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- ~''' CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIFIIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING F.~ AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAllSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE u=:, (y~z PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DFHOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT ~~ ~' FIRST. ~y WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAPF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO HAS JUSTIFIED, BUT TODAY IS BIASFII AND UNEOUNDID. Printed Name Signature Address ~~/'•l' SE v. 1 '~,! ~~ ~T~? y.Vi-i; I ~~ Y'.~~ ~'~ ~'l, L" ~~ 4~~ ~./,-1 '^'I1 ~C~ I ~ ~. `A '.~ Q, i ° n ~. fly 4 '~ r ` ~ J September 11, 1991 F~o+s+B rlit' T0: CitY of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned Page RE: SAM'S PLACE ~ TfU; ~7NDERSIGNEp ARE FRIENDS pND/CR CUS'IOE~S OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAHIXQGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE '133ffi LIMITATION OF ki0UR5 T}D: CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. TY, ~ WOULD LIRE TO STATE AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COE8RINI g~ ATTIIVDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUS~~~RY~NDIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT 'llffi RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BID¢I,NSTIFY THE AN EQUITABLE LIVING BFxAAIJDE~OF~CY AlID D'~AT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED 1NNOCEKL PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE YW C~gyl,Iy REVIEW A FIRST. HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT WE SUPPORT SAM, ACA WAS ,RIgTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASED AND UNF(X1NDID. DECISION THAT SIX YEARS .~._,.ee f A+ -,d ~: fly September 11, 1991 ~„^'" ~ pa .+'.~ Fr 4• T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS AND/OR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE TFIE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDFM'S OF THE COMUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE TfDi ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANT®, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITGTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN D~[TITABLE LNING BECA[7SE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT JUSTIFY TfSE PfQLOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DF2UCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU reaaatn.t.Y REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO NAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BLASID AND UNFOUNDID. Printed Name Signature Address _• -i) 'f L~ ~ L~~.th~~~l ' ~~:~~~~_Y/-~_ -) ~ lam. ~`r~S' JF'C'/'~'lj C}('li i~: ~a~ FG' 1, - _ ~~L i) /'~ ~1~ 'may, ~ / ~ , ~-~1.~ i~ ~. ra L:.r..,: ..~ `~ llS September 11, 1991 TD: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE Page WE THE UNDERSICNID ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTONFRS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCADIDNGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF 1TD; COMUNITY, WE iK7U1D LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A ROSINESS FOR THE ACIIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LE55) IS SLANTED, DISCRIFIINAI'(MY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT TF1E RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO RF2dEFIT FROM EARNIIiG `AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLF26 DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE `~HIIOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND TNAT PEOPLE ARE PRES[R4U INNOCENT IRST. t:~:y.WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULi.Y REVIEW A (y ;7 DECISION THAT SIX YEARS A00 NAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID AND UNFd1NDID. (..l a Printed Name Signature Address -~.L~ ~ r . r 1~ b September 11, 1991 ~~ 1O: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/OR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF F10URS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM•S. AS BUSINESS OWNPItS AND RESIDFMS OF TME COMfINITY, WE WOUID LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE 011 A BUSINESS FOR TME ACTIIXiS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 ND LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRICIIILITORY AND lHi- CONSTTTUTIONAL. TO L1HIT TBE RI(7[15 OF PEOPLE 1O B}NEFTT FROFf EARNING AN HQITITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NDT JUSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT SIE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PDDPLE ARE PRESUMID INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMII.Y AND STAFF AND ASR THAT YU! CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SI% YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, HUT TODAY IS BIASED AND UNFOUNDID. September 11, 1991 Page __ T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UMDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AMD/OR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNE[.IAN STREET, RANCLp CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE TME LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF TED: COMI4JNFTY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS ONNFItS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANIID, DISCRIID:NA10R1C AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. 10 LIMTT TLLE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFTT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEKS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DF2ACRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMID INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BITE TODAY IS BIASID AND UNMROJDID. ~~ Printed Name Signature Address September 11, 1991 Page T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE TfO; UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS AND/OR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS TfO; CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COlTB1NITY, WE WUUI,D LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR 11IE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT 'i10; RIC[TTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LNING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT NSTIFY 1fIE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND 'DiAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAPF AND ASK 1IIAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BVf TODAY IS BIASID AND UNFOUNDED. September 11, 1991 Page __ T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PUCE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREEL, RANCHO CUCAMJNGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF NOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE CO1@1IXPITY, WE [~VULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR TTO; ACTIONS OF PREVIWS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING !uN RpUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR FROBLEMS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DFPIOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YGU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID AND UNFOUNDID. ~QV Printed Name Signature Address September 11, 1991 Page __ IO; City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned ~: SAM'S PLACE 6620 CARNELIAN ~ Tf~ UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, STREET, R4NCH0 CUCMIONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE 'fHE LIP4TATION OF HOURS ~¢, CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. COMMUNITY y1E WOULD LIKE TO STATE p,Np RESIDENTS OF THE EpR y~ ACTIONS OF AS BUSINESS OWNERS IN ADVANCE ON A DIS IMINA'1VRY AND UN- q.~ ATTITUDE OF PLACING Bi'~ RIGfCTS OF PEOPLE TO BAIT FROM EARNING PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1995 NO LESS) IS SLANTED, ~~~~ INNOCENT CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE ••AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAAUSDE~OF~CY AND OTFIAT PEOPLE ARE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE .~T YW CARII'VLLY REV~IEIFWNDED. FIRST. HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ITT TODAY IS BIA5® A~ WE SUPPORT SAM, SAGO WA.S ,HjSTIFIID, DECISION THAT SIX YEAR ,,,___e ~n~ September 11, 1991 Page T0; City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE _ WE THE LTIDERSIGNED ARE FRICENDS ~ STRONGL~SYOO~PPOSEF'1ID: L TATION60FOHOURS IAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONC><+, THE CITY IS Ii¢OSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMMIPRTY. WE WOULD LIRE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE CN A HUS~~S~~RY~AND UN ~ OF PREVIWS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SI.ANTID, CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT 11B: RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOROB~LEt4SID~ ARE p ST~~ I~.~~ PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY FIRST. 41E SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASR THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVI DECISION THAT SIX YEAR5 AGO WA5 NSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BLASID AND UNFOUNDID. Signature Address Printed Name _ ,, _ , r rA _ h " K - , ~ _,.~ e ~ ~G c~ ~ fir ~ 1 ~. 4'; y~ c~~~~~1, S c u~'~ . ' ~ ~ /07~ (y~tcle,n ~s~~~ ." i:r1 ~-A6~ah FN (~VQ.S~ ' ~ ~ ~ . i ' " i ~ ~. ~ h r . ~ , r ~ in 11.7. . ~ ' d ilrJ ~./. , i~~~ !~~~ ~ F ~ j'~ , , i:;~l yJk' lilt J /, l ..1 ..~,ll ~~/n ,~ 111~I~,~-.~ /-F4O ~~~/~)~~, . v September Il, 1991 T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE Page " ~ WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOI~Q•1t5 OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN SIREEI, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE TBE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNFI2S AND RESIDENTS OF THE COt~B•fl117ITY, WE MOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTZ1lIDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING M EQUITABLE LNING BECAUSE OF PRZOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND TNAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUPQD INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIR YEARS AGO NAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY ZS BIASID AND UNFOUNDED. Printed Mane Signature Address - // / , ~` September 11, 1991 Page T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/OR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREEI, RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS II+R'OSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMt4J[QITY, WE MOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTIIIJDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACIIONS OF PREVIWS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANT®, DISCRIl4INATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. 1V LIMIT TBE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES Nl7I JUSTIPY THE PNIf.0.SOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENI FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS PAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION TENT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BLASID AND UNFOUNDID. Printed Name Simiature Address (~t Septemoer 11, 1991 i Page_ T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga 4a: ii <;., ~.~ •• FROM: See undersigned ~~~ RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS AND/OR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO L'UCAMDNGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMEOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COFMIIQITY, WE Wg1ID LIRE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINAIORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE PRTLOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEHD(RACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUt~ INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AMID ASK TAAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASED AND UNFOUNDID. ~~S Printed Name Signature Address September 11, 1991 T0: Cit} of Rancho Cucamonga V ~•~~ FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE Page I_ WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARHELIAPI STREEI, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF NOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. p~¢ BUSINESS OWNk12S AND RESIDENTS OF THE CO!liRJITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSIIJFSS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PRETIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SIANf®, DISCRIHINAIVRY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LII•IIT THE RIGRTS OF PIDDLE 10 BENEFIT PROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT .IUSfIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMICRACIC AlID THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMID INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSIIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID AND UNFW 'MED. Printed Name ,N;'('Jt `~_ ~ n, C . ~, ~~ ~ '~.ti~ • .~ ~i / Si~(gnature Address ii il`~ C u'Y I.L2,x~/,./.~. ~ k4 2 i _¢e'•. .v- Il~ tir .H-:~ c~'~:i r ~ `11 .l •.f ~L(^ ~! 1~,. Cpl! ~~~~ I %~.'. ~. ~17.' ,~ a~-- 5f:~E- NFrrr'~'•nr- i~ Iti'. ctxWi ~' ~. • .: , ." ~i '~~ ' ~L iJ%I~ ~ //~i /d \ i -I, ~~. / i September 11, 1991 Page T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga _- FROM: See undersigned ~~~~~iE'~ RE: SAM'S PLACE NE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIEHIIS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAFUNGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNF1tS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY, WE WOULD LIRE 1Z1 STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNk7lS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMTT TFO; RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBI.Q4S DOES NOT ,RISfIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMJCRALIC AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, NTS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YW CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO NAS NSTZFIID, BllT TODAY IS BIASID AND UNFOUNDID. Printed Name Sigreture -Address - Jai( ~ /;/'/' i ~ ~ (!. ,'- L /''~"'~. ^ .. _ _ C_sc,.~~ ~/~__ iL~ ~.._.;fi~ X937 C,t~r~s pus `c~.~s._,,.. , ' ! i.. ~~, ~ p ~ - . September 11, 1991 Page ` T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See ucdersigned ~~i.<,.: RE: SAM'S PLACE F'``~::, NE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/OR CUS1VNtRS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAlpN(',A, CA. ilE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDFHTS OF THE CO2tfRLITY, NE NWID LIRE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BI,At4: IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINFS4 FOR 111E ACTIONS OF PREPIWS U4RiER5 (IN 1985 ND LESS) IS SLANT®, DISCRIPfftiATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT 1AE RIGHTS OF I+F7DPLE TO BF2LEFTT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LNING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT ,NSTIFY TES PHI]ASOPLIY THAT {~ ARE A U@LOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUPffD INNOCINT FIRST. L7E SUPPORT SAM, LIIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASR TFIAT YCU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO IRIS .IUSTIFIID, BVT TODAY IS BIASED. AND UNFOUPIDID. Printed Name Signature Address . +xi?'~~ ~~ ~,. , ~,../ .i /!! 7 "„ % ''rte/'Y'• c , . ..__ .~ r ~ ... _ ~ .. .. September 11, 1991 Page T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga ^^~ ---.. ~p.ti> FROM: See undersigned p~i~f1+(.u~ RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/OR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMIXiGA, CA. NE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LD'~IITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS GWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COEMINITY, WE GUVII) LIKE TO STATE THE ATTIIVDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTTCNS OF PREVIOUS OWNE125 (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSIITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT TIB: RIGBTS OF PIDDLE TD BENEFTT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES EAT JUSTIFY THE FHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMID INNOCENT FIRSI. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASR TMAT YOU CAREESH.LY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BLASID AND UNFOUNDED. ~~~ Printed Name Signature Address September ti, 1991 Page I0: Ci[y of Rancho Cuc amc nga ~~~+~x., .^.~.~~ F~~f~~u F.?0>l: See a~dersigned A.E: SA`I'S PLACE '~T: IIiE CIDER=:;TT:D .4ftE FR. E\715 AVD/CR CCSTO+fERS OF SA?f'S PLACE, 6620 CAR\`EfS.4ti STREET, R.1.\CNO Cf:~C?.`W\GA, CA. I,E STROivCLY OPPC55 irtE LI'.AITATIOti OF NG[:R3 =t{E CLTY IS I`<pOSItiG G\ SiR'S. .L: BUSINESS 0{.ti7AS .~\U RF=IDE\TS OF THE COFCfL'^,-IlY, G~E irOULD LIKE TO 5T.1TE ~ ATTIttDE OF PL1C2=:~ E_Y`tE IY ADOA.\+:E ON A PUSItiESS FOR THE ACTLONS CF 2PBtT~iCS Ok]'EOS (TN 149> :;0 LESS) IS SL4NTED, E4SCRIMI~ATORY A.:D CN- "~:~II'P_-IIOti.4L. ?0 LS:~1II Ili<. RIGHTS OF PEOPLE i0 3Ev"EFZT EROM E4R.YIYG :. FQUILABLE LIVI'.^ BE:.41'SE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOE; SOT JUSTIFY THE FHiI.OSOPI[Y 'IIi>T t.'E ?R£ A ~=+E"(OCR.aCY AND THAT PEOPLE a[tE PRESLMED I\'CACE+T LRSI. '..`c SUPPORT S?.d, HIS F.~L'•fILY A.\'D SL4FF A`iTl ASK 'L'"_aI YOU C.~IREFL'7.LY REVIEIv A DECISION T}L4T SIX Y~4°.S .=.CO tiA5 JUSTIFIED, Bt~T iOL:`.Y LS BIASED AVD 6DFOC:~T 3}. ~...^.__ \~,,,o - Signa cure Address Page .11L._. Septe~r 11, 1991 T0: CitY of Rancho Cuca-unga ZOM: See undersignzd RE: SAN'S PLACE :~ 1HE LVDFRS:O`'ED ARE F.°.I`-3'v~S 0 CUCA`10\LA, CA. ~p~yQiiO~Y A.\U/OR Cf;STO"tERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 C.AR-\~u'' n~E STRON<'iLY OPPOSE ~¢ LIMITATION OF }iOUR~ SIREEC, lLANCH LIRE TO STATE I}¢ CITY IS I~ffOSI\G v\ 5~+1'S• GO~ffiU~iTY. ~~ IiOUI.D ACTIONS OF IDEhTS OF TIC aU51ES5 FOR 'If¢ ~g gL-<I~rSS OIv~IFItS A\^J RES IY ADGAS~E ON A vI_~CtI"tI\aIORY A.VD L?1- ~ ATIITLUE ')F PLACI oC y`ro`I~E~SI IS SLA-`TCEDrE IO 3E:\T.F IT FRU;1 F3,R.Vi`x+ =REVIOI;S OIv^.~-ERS (I:: 1. ~g5 RI~g OF PEOPL ,n75TIFli '~ TO L^1IT SHE PRIOR PROBLE`L9 DOF` 140'C ~ I\"NOC&\? rO55TiP: CIONAL. r PRFSI~.® }\ Epi: I'C.ABLE LIVI\G B~C 4~DE`NJCRACY ~\~ g{AT PECPL A~ tlEw =- P;{ILGSCPHY Tti\T WE AR- aI YOU C.?REFL[.LY RE' EIRST. k\U ASK 'L`S- e\VD L.'FOl': T'31• ~» ;~ 41.AS JUSTIFIED, BVI TOL AY IS BIASED t:E SLT'PURT S M, FtIS Fa`I: LY d\'D STAFF ..~...crnv THAT SIX YE-~' Septe,nber 11, 1991 paw :O: Ci[Y of Ranc'~o Cuca.onga ~~~~~Y7J47. ~.J!1: See undertiSned ~~~ ?°: S:LN'S PLACE ;2E Ifs Lti'DQtSLG\FD .1R F:tI~VUS A.V'D/CR CI;STOMERS CF SAH'5 PLACE, 66?0 CARV'E2IAY S212EEC, RA\CF[0 C[:C A`1OVY"+A, CA. NE STRONGLY OPPJSS IItE LI!LITATiO,ti OP HOI.'RS i:-~ CIlY IS I9POSI:L ON ~M' =~. ?3 BCSINESS Olr1r'IiS :1.\U RESIDE\'TS OF 'LI¢ CO`t~!R.ti=IY, WE Iv~OULD LIKE TO STAIE I~ .iTTITLUE OF PLAf,I1G SL4`fE I~ ADVANCE ON A 3USINESS FOR IHE ACTIONS OF ?P,ES'IOI:S 0[.ti'FJtS (I,l' 1935 NO LESS) IS SL.4\TED> OI=C.:IMIVATORY .a.\'D L1- .:ONSTITIJTIONAL, TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE IYJ BFIi~PIT FRL^! EaFL`iING ?~ EQUITABLE LI\'ING B_CACSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS JOSS ~0'C JIiSTIEY THE PHILOSOPHY IHAT IrE ARE A DE1IX:FiACY A.1T1 T}IAT PEOPLE ARE PRESL~® IXNOCE\T =IRST. ::E SUPPORT SAY, HIS FAMILY A.\'D S2aFF A,\T. ASK 'Li.1I YOU C.dREFULLY REViEFi a JECISIOti THAT SIX YEARS ACO ivAS J(iSTIFLED, BU-I TOCAY IS BIASED A1'D L:dFOL:ZED. \ ~ ~ ~ ~{ ~I ,ln I ~ Yi ~ i 1._ ,. Iq 2 September 11, 1991 Page ~_ i0: Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga V~1'~3flit4k iROM: See undersi3ned ~~~ RE: S:1N'S PLACE :rE THE l1UERSIGNED AR FRIE~`DS AVU/CR CUSTOMERS OF StVM'S PIACE, 6620 CAR_\'F.C.IA:V STREET, RAV(,T[0 Cl;CAMGNGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE IHE LIMIL4IION OF HOIRS TFIE CITY IS IMPOSI~vM S,4N'S. .15 IiUSI\ESS OSJNERS 4\~ RESIDEI•TS OF TkB3 CG!1MU1'TTY, IrE WOUC,D LIKE TO STATE 7HE ATTIILUE OF PG1CI~ BL4"E IV ADVANCE ON A 9USI\ESS FOR THE ACTIOCiS OF PP,EI'I01'S Ol1"ERS (IN 1985 W LESS) IS SL.4\TED, DISCRIMZtiAIORY A\T L\- CONSTIILTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FRO*i E~RVING .~V EQUITABLE LIVING BECAI'SE OF PRIOR PROBLE:LS DOES NOT Jf.6TIFY THE PHIIpSOP!{Y THAT trE ARE A DE~MJCRACY AVD THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESL~fED I\WCE\T FIRST. :.E SIYPORT SAN, HIS FA~ICLY AND STAFF A:ID ASK TILAT YOU CAREFI,'LLY REVIEZ: A DECISION THAT SIC YES ~S AGO 1r'eU JUSTIFIED, &iT TCDAY IS BIASED A.\V L:~FOL:UED. l ~1 2 September IL, 1991 ~i,i~4~°; ~~ ~~~' U: City of Rancho Cuca crga ~~13~ FROM: See undersigned Page ~_ RE: SAM'S PIACE :vE THE LITIERSIG~"ED AR`_ F?SE\'DS A\V/OR CUSTOMERS OF SA:M'S PLACE, 6620 C.?.R\'ES.I.~.Y TREET, RAYCf10 CUCA.MG\GA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE II{E LIMIT.ATIfH4 OF HOLRS ~ CIIY IS IMPOSI~ GV FAM'$. AS BUSi`+'ESS ~~1.\"E'tiS a\~ 2SIDE\i"CS OF 'fF~ COMMI\:IY, h"E F>3t:LD LZ[CE TO STAIE il{E. ATFL TI,UE OF PLAC IPG SLAME IV AD~AYCE ON A BUSI\FSS E'OR THE ACIIOKS OF 7RE~"IOl;S Oiv'\*ERS (IV 185 :i0 LESS) IS SLLYLEU, DISCRIML\ATORY :1'+V ll- COtiSTIIL"IIO\AL. TO Lit1I; THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BE.\'EFIL FROH EARVI'.vG .~.C EQI,ITABLE LICISG BECACSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES \OT JUSTIFY THE ?FSILOSCP.4Y THAT ti'E A.RE A DEMOCRACY AhU THAT PEOPIi ARE PRE51.4D.D IA'10CE\T FIRST. '.+E Sl2PORT SAM, HIS i.A`U:Y AYD STAFF A."+U ASK TYAI YOU CAP.EFILLY RE\'IE~v A OECLSIOY THAI SI7i YEa~S ?.CA BAS JCSTIFIED, 8UL IODAY IS BIASED .A.\U [.:hFOI::ICED. .iepcesiber 11, 1991 Page ~_ ~j~i~E+ty4tLi~ rot City of Rancho Cucaranga ~{ ?'RO^!: See undersigned RE: SA.N'S PUCE G'E THE C'yD6RSTG\r'D. ARE FRiE\US Y`+D/CR GUSTO?ff.Rs OF SAY'S PLACE, 6620 C.~IR\FI.I.L"7 5~~, 2A*iCFfO CL'CAtCi`Y',A, CA. trE STRONGLY OPFUSF. IHE LIMITATION OF HOL~.S '~ GITY I5 2MPOSI?~Y, UY SAM'S. ;LS BI:S[~F.SS OldirFi{S A.~D RESIDE4L5 OF THE COh4R.Z?TY, kB (rUUCD LIKE IO STATE T?fE AITITLUZ OF PLAGI\Y BL~`R; IV A6VA\~E ON A 3USi\`ESS FOR Trd; ACTIONS OF PP.E4'IOCS OI,1"ERS (I:7 1°85 \b LFSS) IS SL.AtiTt"D, TJSSCRTMIXATORY AW Ll- COVSTIIVIIO\~I.. TO LIM22 TLIE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE 1V BE\Er IT FAOCI E,SR\ThG A.V E4U?TABLE LI:'ItiC 8ECAISE OF PRIOR PROBLFAtS DOES \OT .NSTLFY 2HE PHILOSOPHY Ti{AT (7E ARE A DE.`tOCRACY A\'D TlidT PEOPCZ ARE PRESL?RID I~'t:OCE\T FIRST. 6'E SCPPORT SAN, HIS FA.•tILY A.YD STAFF .8,\D ASK Lid2 YOU C.dREFItLY REti'ihZJ a RECISi05 'G~L4T SIX YEA.4S AGO WAS JI"STLFIED, BUY IC~OAY IS BLASED A:\L C.\FOL:~C•ED. ?: inced >;a;,e --- - Signature Address .`epee^Ser 11, 1991 _ Page L _ .0: Ci[y of Rancho Cuca-onga ~b F3OM: See undersigned ?B: SAM'S PLACE nE 7I{`c C:\U[P,Stn"F.D ARE FRIRDS A4D/CR Ct"STOPtFR3 OF 5.~1"'('S PLACE, 6620 C:1P~'ES.I.4< STRE£f, Re4\CHO CIT:A"~1C~iGA, CA, fr'E S1RO:iGLY OPPCSS ZHE LIMILAIIOY OF HDIRS ~ CITY IS IMPOS I`~ ON SAM'S. '~ Bl"3I\ESS OIrtiTRS >":D RESIDE\TS OF IIiE CG."PILZilY, WE WUL'LD LIKE TO STAtE :?ff ATIITLDE OF PL\C~ BLd~ IY AD4",IVCE 6Y A 3C'SI'4'E5 FOR T~ ACTIOYS GF ?RE4IOC'S Ok:\'ERS iIV 2985 \D LESS) Is' SL4ITFD, DISCRI' iYATORY ?\U L'ti- :OtiSTI1LTIO`1~1L. TO LIMiT '6tE RI.,HTS GF PFAPLE i0 BE'~EFIT FROI.1 EaR.VIY ;.G EQL'ILABLE LIl"i\G BECALS'e OF PRIOR PROBLE~LS DOFa WT .IL'STIFY '1.71E ?HILOSOP.4Y TkI.4T ~nT; ~=~ A DEfOC&aCY A~T1 THAT PFAPLE ARE PRESL~® IM"tiOCE~T =IRST. :.1 SLYFJRT SA'{, HIS FAMILY eLVD STAFF A\a ASK L:,iT YOU C:iREFILY REti IEt:.A '?ECISIOV TIL~4I SI!( YE-RS aC-0 WAS .R~STIFIED, BU'T TGDAY IS BI.aSED A\Tl L:FGi.~T~ED. ~h RESOLUTION No. 9l- 3 50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO NCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING TNe APPEAL AND UPNOLDTNG THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO AEFOEE CONDITIONAL USE pEPMIT NO. 78-03 PoA THB OPERATION OP A HAR IN CONJUNCTION MITH A AHSTAURANT tQCaTEO IN TftE NEIGHBORHOOD COMINiRCIAL DISTRICT AT 6620 CAWiELIAN STRHET, NOATHNEST CORNER OP 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS AND N1IEING PINDINCS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-eft-56 THROUGR 60 A. Recitals. (1) On the Decsmblr 27, 1978, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved Conditional Use Fermit 70-03 for a restaurant with relstsd bar tacilitiee and musical eneertsinsent permitting hours of opnrstlon frm 17:00 a.m. to 2:00 a. m. On the of July 10, 1985, the City of Rancho Cucamonga modified Conditional Uee permit 78-03 to restrict the hours frm 11:00 s.m. to 11,00 p.m. and eliminete the provision for entertainment at the facility. Sii) On the July 10, 1991, continued to the July 24 and August Ia, 1991. the Planning Comsdaalon of the City of Rancho Cueuonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the compliance review of Conditional vac permit No. 78-03- {111) On august 16, 1991. the Planning Commission of the City o! Rancho Cucamonga received public testimony and concluded asid Compliance hearing on that dote end net a new public hearing on Saplembar /1, 1991 for the consideration of a mispension and/or revocation of Conditional Use Permit No. 78-03. (iv) On September 11, 1991, the planning Cwmiseion of the City of Poncho Cucamonga concluMd said hearing end adopted Resolution No. 91-13] thereby recommending to this Council that Conditional Uae Permit 78-03 for a bac facility be revoked. (v} The decision rapraeentad by asid Planning Cowission Resolution was timely sppeeled to thin Council. (vi) On October 16 sad Continued to November 20, 1991, the City Council of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the revocation of Conditional Uae Permit 78-03 and concluded said hearing on November 20, 1991. (vii) All legal prerequi eitne prior !o the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOM, THEWIFOPE, St i• hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the city of Poncho Cucamonga es follows: ~~~ CITY COONCIL RBBOLUTION NO. CUP 79-03 - REVOCATION OF CUP FOR BAM'3 PLACE November 20, 1991 Page 2 1. This Council hereby epecifical ly finds that all of the facie eat forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon eubetantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings, including written staff reports, the minuted of the above referenced Planning Commlaeion coatings and the contents of the Planning Comlenion Resolution No. 91-133, this Council hereby apecifical ly finds ea follows: (a) The busineae location is et the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets with a street frontage of 1,037 feet and lot depth of 240 feet and is presently improved rith a shopping center. (b) The property to the north of the subject Bite Sa a future freeway? the property to the south is en existing shopping canlsrl the property to the east Se an existing shopping centers and the property to the went Se existing single family residences. (c) The owner Ass requested an amndmnt to axeand the hours of operation to coincide with those eatabliahsd by the applieant'a alcoholic beverage control license: LAat is, from the current cloning hours of 11:00 p. m. to a new closing hour of 2:00 a.m., Monday through saturGyf and eliminating the conditions of approval prohibiting liw entertainment. Concurrently wiih the rewcation reeler thi• Council has denied each mdifiaaiion request. (d) The owner filed the sam application to extend the hours of operation on Mey 22, 1990, end the application wad denied on appeal by City Council on January 2, 1991, by adoption of their Resolution No. 91-007. (e) Ths current limitation on hours of operation to 11:00 p.m. and the elimination of live enterteimm~t were asLSblishad as a direct result of a history of public safety and public nuisance problems associated with this location. (f) The former problew have not occurred since the curtailment of the hours to 11:00 p.m. end the elimination of live entarteimm~t. (g) The owner has been operating the business beyond the 11:00 p. m. limitatian and offered live entartaimm~! in violation of the conditions of approval as contained in Resolutions No. 83-117, 83-117-A, end 91-007 for Conditional Uae Permit No. 78-03 end Ordinance No. 290 per[aining to Hntertainment Permits. (h) The City received written complaints objecting to the business operation, epecltically the hours of operation and the live entertelnment. (il Bush hours o[ operation beyond 11100 p.m., together with live entertaimm~t, Se deirimntel to the surrounding single family residences because of their close proximity end because of the nature oC bar [acllitiea. ~R~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLITfION NO. CUP 78-03 - REVOCATION OF CUP POR SAN'S PLACE November 20, 1991 Page 3 (j) Such hours of operation beyond 11:00 p.m., together with live entertainment for a bar facility, Se incompatible with the surrowdtng residential area. 3. Sexed upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-Yeferenced public hearings and upon the speci[ic findings of facia set forth in parsgrapha 1 and 2 shove, this Council hereby finds and croncludas ss follows: (a) The Conditional tlss Permit Se not being conduMad in en appropriate Benner and moditlcstions are not available to mitigate the fapacts. Therefore, the perrii should bs revoked which requires the operation to cease and desist Sn the time allotted by the Council. 4. eased upon Lhe findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, Chia Council hereby revokes Conditional tlu Pessit No. 78- 03 end the use shell eeaq end desis! within ten days frd the data of the adoption of this Resolution. 5. Thi• Council hereby provides notice to John Mannarino tMt the rise within which judicial review o[ the decision Iaprepnlad by this Resolution moat ba sought is governed by eha provlsioaa of G1lfoYnL Code of Civil Procedure Section 1091.6. 6. The City Clerk of the Ciiy of Poncho Ncamongs Se hereby directed to: (e) carii ty to iha adoplSOn of this Resolution, and (b) forthwieh transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by eartitied wil, return- receipt requestadr to John Msnnerino at the address identified !n Ciiy records. 7. Tha city Clark shall certlty to Lha sdoption of this Maolution. l9q RESOLUTION NO. 9`-~~/ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING THE APPHAL AND UPROLDING TAE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY TH6 ANEND!@NT TO CONDITIONAL OS6 PERMIT 73-03 FOR TN6 REQUEST TO EATSND THE SOURS OP OPERATION AND AMEND THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL PROHIBITING LIVE ENTERTAINMENT POR AN 8%ISTING RESTAURANT AND BAA LOCATED IN THE NBIGH8ORAOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AT 6620 CARNELIAN STRHET, NORTHWEST CORNEA OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS AND MAESNC FINDINGS Ili SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-311-56 TRROUGR 60 A. Recitals. (1) John Mannerino, on DehalE of Sae Pellegrino, has filed a petition to modify the Conditions of Approval for Conditional Dsa Psrtlt 73-03 ae described in the title of this Resolution. Rereinsftsr in tats Resolution. the subject Conditional Ose Persdt is referred tO as the "spplication." (11) On July 10, 1991, end continued to July 2e, August 1~, end September 11, 1991, the Planning Cosadasion of tae CSty of Rancho Cucuonga conducted duly noticed pu6lie hearings on the application end following the conclusion of eaid public hearings, adopted Rewlution No. 91-131 thereby zecoamendin9 to this City Council that acid application iM denied. (11i) The decision represented DY eaid Planning Cosmiaaion Rawlution was timely appenled to this Council. (iv) on October 16 And continued to November 2D, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaeonga conducted duly notice public hearings on the application end concluded said hearing on that date. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, end resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Ncamon9a as Eollowa: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the Carte set forth in the Recitals, Pert "A," of this Aewlution aze Crue and correct. 2. Based upon aubatantiel evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings including written staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Ca1101ssion meeting, end the conten to of Planning Commies ion Resolution No. 91-131 this Council hereby specifically finds se follows: (e) The application applied to property located a[ the northwsat corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets with a street frontage of 1,031 feet and lot depth of 240 Leer end Se praaenily improved with a ehoppinq center. 20D CITY COUNCIL REROLUTION N0. CUP 78-03 - AMENDMENT DENIAL - SAM'S PLACE November 20, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a Euture freeway; the property to the south cf that site is an existing shopping center; the property to the east is an existing shopping center; and the property to the west is existing single family residences. (c) The proposed amendment contemplates extending the hours of operation to coincide with those established by the applicant's alcoholic beverage control license; that is, from the current closing hours of 11:00 p. m. to a new closing hour of 2:00 a.m., Monday through Saturday; and eliminating the conditions of approval prohibi ti.ng live entertainment. (d) The applicant filed the same applieation to extend the hours of operation on May 22, 1990, and the application was denied on appeal by City Council on January 2, 1991, by adoption of their Resolution Nn. 91-007. (e) The Development Code, Section 17.04.030 N, states that following the denial or revocation of a Conditional Uae Permit application, no application for a Conditional Use Permit for the same or substantially the same use of the same or substantially the same site shall be filed within one year from the date of denial or revocation. (f) The applicant has been operatino the business beyond the 11:00 p. m. limitation and offering live entertainment Sn violation of the conditions of approval and in violation of Ordinance No. 290 pertaining to Entertainment Permits. (g) The current limitation on hours of operation to 11:00 p.m. was established as a direct result of a history of public safety and public, nuisance problems essooiated with this location. (h) The former problems have not occurred since the curtailment of the hours to 11:00 p.m. and the elimination of related live entertainment. (i) The extension of hours of operation together with the live entertainment may be detrimental to the surrounding single faml Ly residences because of their close proximity and because of the natur¢ of bar facilities. (j) The extension of hours of operation together with the live entertainment would be incompatible with the surrounding residential area. 3. Rased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Counci~. during the above-referenced public hearings, including written and oral. staff reports, this Council he<eby finds and concludes as follow9: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the Genera' Plan, the object. tuts of [he Development Code, and the purposes of the distr i~~r. in which the Bite is Located. (b) That the proposed use will be detrimental to the puhL - health, safety or welfare, o< materially in jurioua to properties ~~r improvements In the vicinity. 2~ 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION YO. CVP 78-03 -AMENDMENT DfiT1IAL - SAME PLACE November 20, 1991 Page 3 4. The City Council of the Gity of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies the application. All conditions of approval contained in City Council Resolution No. 91-007 shall remain Sn full force and effect. 5• This Council hereby provides notice to John Mannerino that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution most be sought is governed by the proviaion9 0£ California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6• The Ciiy Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of th19 Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to John Mennerino at the address identified in City records. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Zo 2 AESOLi1T ION N0. 91-35a- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPtlOLDING THS PLANNING COMMISSIRi'H DECISION TO DENY RNTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 FOR THE REQUEST TO CONDUCT LIVE FNTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTIQi KITH A RESTAURANT AND HAR LOCAT® IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AT 6620 GRNELIAN STREET, NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-66 THROUGH 60 A. Recitals. (i) John Mannerino, an behalf of Sem Pellegrino, hoe filed an application for Entertainment Permit 91-02 as described in the title of [hie Resolution. Nereinnfter in this Aeeolution, the aubiect Entertainment Permit is referred to ae the "npplication." (Si) On July 10, 1991, and rnntlnued to July 26, August 10, and September 11, 1991, the "Ylanninq Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and followlnq the conclusion of said public hearings, adopted Resolution No. 91-132 thereby recom:ending to this city Council thaC said application De denied. (iii) The decision represented Dy said Planning Co®19aion Aeeolution was timely appealed to Chia Council. (iv) On October 16, and continued to November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and concluded said hearing o1: thnt date. (v) All legal precequieitea prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREPOREr it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically Einde that all of the Facts set Forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Aeeolution are true and correct. 2. Baaed upon aubstentlal evidence prevented to this Count ll during the above-referenced public hearings including written staff reports, she minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commieaion meeting, end the contents ZO~J CITY COUNCIL RBEOLDTION N0. EP 91-02 - DENIAL OY ENTERTAINMENT PEFM IT - SAN'S PLACE November 20, 1991 Page 2 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-132, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets with a street frontage of 1,037 feet and lot depth of 240 feet and is presently improved wish a shopping center. (D) The property to the north of the aubj act site is a future freeway; the property to the south of that site is an existing shopping center; the property to the east is an existing shopping center; and the property to the went is exiaiing single family residences. {c) The applicant hoe been operating the business beyond the 11;00 p.m. limitation and offering live entertainment in violation of the conditions of approval ae contained in Resolution Noe. 83-117 and 91-007 for Conditional Uae Permit No. 7H-03 and Ordinance No. 290 pertaining to Entertainment Permil8. (d) The City received written oomplalnte objecting to the la tenses of the hours of operation and the live entertainment. (e) The current limitation on hours cP operation to 11:00 p.m. and the elimineiion of live entertainment ware established as a direct result of a history of public safety and public nuisance problems associated with this location. (f) The former problems have not occurred since the curtailment of the hours to 11:00 p.m. and the eliminelSOn of live entertainment. (g) The extension of hours of operation together with live entertainment may be dettlmental to the surrounding single family residences becauae.oE their close proximity end because of the nature of bar facllitles. (h) The extension of hours of operation together with live entertainment for a bar facility would be incompatible with the surrounding residential area. 3. Hosed upon the eubetantiel evidence presented to this Councit during tha above-referenced public hearings, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The conduct of the eetabliehment or the granting of the application would be mntrery to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare; and (b) TAe promises or eetabliehment Se likely to be operated ;n an ll legs 1, improper, or disorderly manner; and toy CITY COUNCIL RESOLOf2ON NO. EP 91-02 - DENIAL OP ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT - SAM'S PLACB NOVember 20, 1991 Page 3 nuisance; ana (c) That granting the application Gould create a public (d) Thet the normal operation of the premiaea would interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding residential neighbo zhood. 4. Tha City Council of Ne City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies the application. All conditions of approval oonta fined in City Council Resolution No. 91-007 shall remain in full force and effect. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to JoM Mannezino that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution moat be sought is governed by the proviaione of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify Co the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthaiih transmit a ceztified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to John Mannerino et the addreea identified in City records. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. aoS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager S[JBJF_CI': PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED COMMUNfIY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-1 The proponents for the proposed Community Facilities District 91-I have requested a continuance of the public hearing scheduled for November 20, 1991, The purpose, as per the attached letter from The William Lyon Company, is to allow for refinements in calculations to the Engineer's Report and for review of the Report by property owners within the proposed District. Staff will schedule the public hearing for this item on the December 4, 1991 City Council agenda. Respectfully submitted, i~c.wri.,~ ~C, tia.u~~ Linda D. Daniels Deputy City Manager SENT 8Y~ .11-15-97 1028 7144782047+ 7148681848 1•f 2 LYON .~e W1L7.iAM LYOly~ v`-- `~"~'~ 4490 VON NARM4N, P.O. BOX 7520, NEN2~OliT BE4CH, CA 9265&7520 • (71d) 833$y0p .FAX (714) d76B606 lfovasher 15, 1991 Ms. Linda Daniels Deputy Clty Manager CSiy o! Rancho Cwaaanga 10500 Civic CutUr Driw Rancho Cucaaonga, Calilornla 91729 Rey Cor~mity rw111tiu Diairiat Ito. 91-1 Dear Linda The Rewlutlon of lorrilon !or tM sub~wt tMllo-Roos dlatrlet Se scheduled tot the Movuwr 20, 1991 City Council retina. Me rpwat tMt the iter be ocntimad to tM lollovinq CSLy Couacll retina on Decrbar L, 1991. The reaaoa !or tM ca~tinuance is that LurtLar nlineaanta ww bean dawlopW !or the proiwted ialraettvotun ooaU flat Rte C011Waed Sn the 0091nNrs Rtport. 11wI Rngirers Report is being provided to all landoiman 1n LM aoaaamlty laoilitir district, and thy red nl!liciwt fir to review the rdriai prior W CM City Council rating. Thank you 1n advance !or your cooparatian on this roar. 9lncerely, OarY Div1s t4nager Inl 6apire Division OL~lbi OO12CAC cc~ Dan yalix, 7'he Hahn Coapany john PotGr, Hughaa InwatrnU John Toreaatl, Dewlopaant planning G Yinanoinq Group John Yaeger, Ferris, Tester, Rtuse & Krlaekl' ~u~ ~ .. . ,~ , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991 y~-y~ T0: Mdyor and Members of the City Council ~"'~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-15 UlY[IWI~LEU Appeal of two (2) conditions Of approval mpos y the Planning Commission regarding the undergroundfng of utilities within the Route 30 Freeway right-of-way ad,)acent to a shopping center in the Neighborhood Conwerclal District, located at the northeast corner of Haven and Highland Avenues - APN: 201-271-65 and 71 Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the D)anning Commission's decision and deny the appeal request by adoPting the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Dn June 26, 1991, the Planning Commission conditionally approved Development Review No. 89-15 for the third and final phase of the Haven Village Shopping Center. The applicant appealed two of the conditions of approval on Juty 3, 1991, and requested the item be heard at the second City Council meeting 1n September. At the applicant's request, the appeal hearing was postponed twice. The applicant's appeai setters are attached. On November 12, 1991, staff received the attached letter from the applicant's attorney. The City Attorney 1s currently reviewing the letter. The applicant is appealing En99sneering conditions 4 and 5 of Planning Lommlssion Resolution No. 91-78 (attached). Condition 4 requires the Developer to underground existingg overhead utilities on the east side of Haven Avenue acrpss the Route 30 Freeway right-of-Ntly adjacent to the pro,iect south boundary. Condition 5 requires palyment of an 1n-lieu fee for the future undergraunding of existing overhead utilities on the north side of Highland Avenue. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 89-15 - DIVERSIFIED November 20, 1991 Page 2 The applicant has listed ten objections to the conditions in question. These can be grouped into three general categories: evolution in the City's undergrounding policies, excessive cost, and impacts of Freeway construction. Utilities Underaroundina Polic Revision Conditions 4 and 5 are based on Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96 (attached), adopted to June of 1987. The applicant argues they satisfied the orl ginal condition placed on Parcel Map 9416 in November of 1985: Existing lines of less than 66KY fronting the property shall be undergrounded". Another condition of Parcel Map 9416 specified that Parcel 9 (Exhibit A) could not be developed until the Cal trans right-of-way needs were resolved. Before the latter was finalized, the undergrounding policy had been revised. Regardless of the reason for the delay, new development is subject to current poi icy. Excessive Cost for a_Snyll Corner Parcel The applicant estimates these two conditions will add between 5280,000 and f300,000 to the f450,000 cost of development. He feels the burden is too high when calculated on a building square footage basis. If the additional costs were spread over the entire square footage of the shopping center this bull ding's share would only be 8.3 percent of the total. Staff hes the following responses: a) Based nn the Revised Schedule of Fees In-Lieu of Undergrounding (City Council Resolution No. 88-180, copy attached), the half fee for future undergrounding of electrical and telecommunlcatlon lines along Highland Avenue will be 575,083. Using those same unit prices, the cost for undergrounding the electrical and telecommunication lines on Haven Avenue 1s estimated to be f122,500, bringing the total to about f191,600, somewhat less than the applicant's 5300,000 estimate. b) Condition 4 allows the developer to request a reimbursement agreement against future development of the vacant parcels on the west side of Haven Avenue and the south side of Highland Avenue (refer to Exhibits A and B), How Freeway Construction will Affect Utilities The applicant believes that Caitrans will be undergrounding these lines upon construction of the Route 30 Freeway anyway and is fearful that undergrounding now would be a wasted effort because Cat trans would still be relocating them with the freeway construction. Staff has contacted the Route 30 Design staff at Caitrans, who offered the following comments: 01 tT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 89-15 - DIVERSIFIED November 20, 1991 Page 3 a) Cal trans does relocate all utilities which confl 1ct with their facilities; however, they select the most economical relocation method and, as a rule, relocate in the same condition they are found. b) Cal trans wilt underground existing overhead utilities 1f the utility companies tell them (1) undergrounding is more economical ar (2) it is physically impossible to span the Cal trans facility. c) Utilities must be relocated outside of Cal trans rights-of-way. In a case like this, where the street crosses under a freeway interchange, overhead lines could be suspended beneath the bridge, but the poles would need to be located outside the right-of-way. d) Cal trans has master agreements with 6TE, PacBe11, etc., regarding the sharing of costs for utility relocation between Cal trans and the utility companies. In the absence of detailed plans to review, Cal trans is unable to state whether they would underground the existing overhead utilities in this particular case. Staff feels 1t is reasonable to assume that those along Hi9hl and Avenue could be relocated overhead. The City has already collected undergrounding fees from at least seven other developments along Highland Avenue 1n order to fund the additional cost of undergrounding these lines when Cal trans 1s reaQy to relocate them. On the basis of conversations with both General Telephone Company and Southern California Edison, staff believes Cal trans will probably underground the Haven Avenue lines with the construction of the freeway rather than attempt to span an interchange. If the City requires the Developer to underground now, GTE indicates 1t would do so 1n a manner making future relocation by Cal trans unnecessary, but SCE does not feel the freeway design 15 far enough along for them to da the same. The Planning Commission did express sympathy with the argument that Cal trans would probably do the undergrounding along Haven Avenue with the construction of the freeway. Condition 4 was modified at the Planning Commission hearing to include the sentence: "If the developer can obtain, prior t0 the issuance of building permits, assurance from Cal trans that the utilities will be undergrounded by and at Cal trans' expense upon construction of the freeway, this requirement will be waived." ao~g CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 89-15 - DIVERSIFIED November 20, 1991 Page 4 The modification to Condition 4 Dy the Planntng Commission provides the developer with the means to obtain a waiver of the Haven Avenue undergrounding requirement; therefore it is not necessary to delete the condition. Condition 5 is necessary so the City can underground the Highland Avenue lines 1n the future, instead of allowing Cal trans to simply relocate them upon construction of the Route 30 Freeway. Respectfully s fitted, ~~ Nm. Joe O'Ne1 C1 ty Engineer NJO:BAM:dIw Attachments: Exhibit "A", Vicinity Map Exhibit "B", Existing Overhead Utilities Appeal Letters Letter from Applicant's Attorney Planning Camnlsslon Resolution 87-96, Undergroundtng Policy City Council Resolution 88-180, Undergroundtng Fees Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Staff Report Planntng Commission Resolution 91-78, DR 89-15 Approval Resolution ~.o~ C ~ i i _ _ ~ ,, r--•-~ ,,-; r-- ~~~~T~ ~ ~~ ~`~. ~,. I ,s~ ~~~ i i~~ `r Wi i ~~~J ~~ i J (..`rte ddJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIJEERLNG DM3ION ~~ ,~ ~r ~~= IW~, N TPEM: DR 89-15 APPEAL TITLE: VICINITY MAP „ A,. EXHIBIT: ab~ fl -~- N'i~~y ~_~_ ~ ~ JJ i' ~TI ~p ~yC~G Qy 15~,, ~ i ~~ e- ~ i. ~ ,, O ~`~ ..._ __ i ~oeesev~ ~ ~ ....' ..« '~ -~ ' ' ~ ~~7k- _~__. y t _ `~~• _ _ _ •~.A ~ --, - _ TE• -_~ Kµ `fin' ~.i{i V `~~~GJ~ _ .`, h ~,, : ~, - .. 4 ~~~ ~ I • ;,~_ :` 'I~ rI N CITY OF ITEM: DR 8H-IS APPEAL RANCHO CUCAMONGA TTl?.E:QyF1lNEAD N TIUTIES ENGIIQEERIIdG DM9ION EXFIIBIT: d ~~ ___ ~o~ E ,' j DIVERSIFlED SHOPPING ~I~i CENTERS 'C October 7, 1991 ~ ~~ Debra Adams City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Decision Development Review 89-15 Dear Ms. Adams: We request that the above-referenced appeal that was scheduled for the September 18, 1991 City Council Meeting be postponed to the November 20, 1991 city Council Meeting. Our appeal requires interaction with other governmental agencies. We currently are working with CALTRANS and the utility companies to resolve our outstanding issues; therefore, we are requesting additional time for this appeal. We appreciate your consideration of this request. Sincerely, DIVERSIF~I!%~E"D///~S/HyOPPING CENTERS ohn S. O'Meat~`~' General Partner JSO/rr cc: Rick Gomez, Coaununity Dev. Betty Miller, Engineering Dept. Tom Grahn, Planning Dept. Tom Clarke, S Y C & R Mary Rohrer 2910 ped NAI Benue, Smie ]W. PO Bo, 50<]. Cwu Ma,. Ctlilemn 93678~!Otl 1]10195 ]~36f I ~nl F DIVERSIFIED SHOPPING CENTERS September 4, 1991 Debra Adams City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Decision Development Review 89-15 Dear Ma. Adams: We request that the above-referenced appeal scheduled for the September 18, 1991 City Council Meeting be postponed for one month. Because our appeal requires interaction with other governmental agencies, we are requesting additional time for this appeal. Wa appreciate your consideration of this request. Sincerely, DIVERSIFIED SHOPPING CENTERS General Partner JSO/rr cc: Rick Gomez, Community Dev. Betty Miller, Engineering Dept. Tom Grahn, Planning Dept. Tom Clarke Mary Rohrer ~ o~ 6 :9I0 Red Hill A.enue. Sune llq. P O Bow SOn, Cosu Mop. Calilomu 91fi1B40tl ill <I 95~4M151 CC'~ Sack '#L"~ k '~re:.d DIVERSIFlED / ~'~`M SHOPPMC CENTERS / 1; `\ ~ ` .: July 3, 1991 ~"'~ ~ ~~~' ~ 5 ]991 Debra Adams '- RECEIVED City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA j ~ losao civic ceater ~ : ~y Rwcho Cucareon8a, California 91730 Re: Appeal of Plamin8 Commission Decision Dwdopmem Review 89.15 Dear Ma. Adams: Oa June 26, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamon8a Plaooin8 Commission approved the strove mentioned devdopmem review for two additional rend bu8dio8a u our exiatio8 shoppint; amen u Ne nonheaa corner of Havw Avenue and HiBhlaod Avenue. By Mis lever, we request mat this decision be appealed to the City CouncB. Our reason for the appeal are as follows: (I) We were restricted from buildio8 thin buRdinB ori8ioally by the City and Cdtram pendm8 resolution of the fraway ri8htofway. Attached is the City Stall Report from October 1983 aPProv~B our pared map. Paragraph 4d on Page 6 rettriar devdopmmt on the parcel we wrreotly Gave m for devdopmem review. During thu delay period, the City revised its fee schedules. Lucky opened November 1986, Pay Lau opened March 1987, and the roviaed freeway pared map wu recorded Oaoba 1987. 73e origind recoNad Dared map prohibited bu8ding oR pucel 9 (the subject of this applicatlon) until a tevised heeway digoment wu approved by Caltrans. (2) 'Ibis projea origindly uodergrovoded all of the line dong Haven Avenue in accordance witb City regttvameab. Patagrsph B7 and G2 of attached Stiff Report were satisfied. (3) Per our otlgioal approval, this public hearing iwolva building deign review ody. All other conditions of devdopmem have been suisfied. (4) No nexus exim between this developmwt review aed Engineering Condition 4 & 3. (3) A shopping center wiW separam ownerships (Lucky, Pay Lau, Unto Oil, McDonld's, and We existing shops) is an integrued entity opnytiag n a single unit. H additional fat tie imposed on the shoppin8 Center, this building should nM carry the burden for the entire development but is proran shue ody, i,e., 8.3!li of the mW fa. .~ 01 ~-~ 2910 aM Hill Avmu~. Suiu 200. P O, Boy SOQ. Cam Mug. Ctlifomie 92618dOtl t1 N1951Q651 Debra Aaarm city clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga July 3, 1991 Page Two (6) Caltrant owes the entire rightof--way, which includn all of these power and tdeammuoiadom Jinn. and w01 need m underground these lives io connation with the comtrudion of the fteewry in 1995. ('>) It is highly likely that Caztrwa wtll completely demolish the proposed uodngrottod lies in correction wiW the freeway atutruction. (B) The mst of Engineering Condiliom 4 do S wBl approximazdy 5280,000 to 5300.000 or f25 to 526.25 per aquae foot of building uea on top of the prorua share of other fen and off-site mm asaociazed with this development. (9) Commiuwner John Mdchn stressed az our useaing that the City had decidd not to proceed with the Haven Avenue mcdiam in the Caltram dghbof--wry hetauae of the likelihood the mediass would be dntroyad during the ooostruction of the troewry. QO) Since our tons cwt of developing this building w01 approahruro S{50,000, we carrot absorb f280,000 to 5300,000 in ten, which fu coeds the fee perctmuge associazed with other devdopmeots in the City. Since it is impossible for us m build the two buildings m our applicarion wiN Engineering Cooditiom 4 d: S in plea, we requnt the City Cauec0 review thh appeal. Because of summer schedule and our nod to invnOgaza utiliy undergrounding with Caltram and the vaelau utility mmpaoin, we requert this appeal be heard during the aecood City Council meeting io September, WedoeWay, September 17. We would appreciate the City addrnsing this tnatter. We have eoclaaed a check [a 5126.00 so noun the rnu of our appeal, Sincerely, DIVERSIp7Ep SHOPPING CENTERS ~~~~ John S. O'Meara General Partner JOM/jh enclosure cc: Mary L. Rohrer i)ebra tlanks Jerry Guartacirto, Aaaz. Planner Barrye HanseNSr. Civil Engineer ao~= ORt~ pn~ I~roirAC„ , . Sw 4d., p~ 1. ~~ .wq~ ~~ J '~, CITY O~RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,~, r~ ~~ (~~// harks J. euQUa 11 Jefher Rinx 19 i1 ~khard \I. Dahl Pamrk J. Wright Decemher 4, 1985 '•5!~ Diversified Properties 2910 Red Hill Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92626 Dear Property Owner, Parcel Map 9416 has been approved by the Planning Commission effective November 27, 1985, subject to the conditions in the enclosed City Engineer's Report. The conditional approval for your subdivision is valid for an initial 24-month period. A one-year time extension may be granted if a written request is received by the City 60 days prior to the expiration of the initial 24-month approval period. During that time, you may suhmft the final map to the Engineering Division for plan checking. The items listed below marked "%", are required to be fulfilled prior to submittal and/or recording of the map. These are listed for your convenience as an aid to the orderly processing and development of your project. 7~~ Payment of plan check fees: map and plans will not be accepted for checking without accompanying fees. ~ x/ /' Executed street improvement bands (forms may be obtained from the City Engineer's Office). The amount of the bonds will be calculated after the street Improvement plans are approved. Approved street plan (City Engineer). Approved grading plan (City Building OfficialL fn conformance with Ordinance No. 24. Irv i air °^'+'^""'-"" ^"' ~ k~ Cash monumentat ion deposit on file. CJL ,.~/~.-Ln ,a,,,,,,,,,.,7 % Approved Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (City Attorney) to be recorded with the map (tonturrently). ~ Payment of a printing fee far copies of the recorded map (51.00 per page and a total of 12 sets). The copies are mailed by the City to various utilities and public agencies. ~~~ T l0T0 BASELC7E ROAD, SUITE C • POST OFFICE BDx 807 • NANCIIO COCA>IO~G A. CA LIFOR4IA 91700 17111 Y•9~IN51 Diversified Properties Parcel Map 9416 December 4, 1985 Page 2 A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement far Certain fees are required prior to the issuance of a bui ldtng permit, such as the storm drain fee and systems development fees, park fee, beautification fee and school fees as applicable. Prior to commencing of any work in the public right-of-way, an "Encroachment Permit" must be obtained from the Engineering 0lvtsion. The following is a list of items required prior to obtaining a Grading Permit from the Building Division. x Approved Landscape Plan (Planning Division) X Grading Bond (Building Division) X Tree Removal Permit (Planning Division) Please contact Barbara Kroll or the undersigned for fnformatton concerning fulfillment of the listed conditions and submittal of a final parcel map for approval by City Council. Cordially, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION ~~/t y~ a~~ lfi~ov`~v DARRYE R. HANSON Senior Civil Engineer BRH: f as Enc. cc: Anacal Engineering ~o`IK RESOLUTION N0. 85-178 ~, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9416 tTENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 9416) LOCATED EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN HIGHLAND ANO LEMON AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9416, submitted by Diversified Properties and consisting of 10 parcels, located east of Haven Avenue bet•ueen Highland and lemon Avenue being a divis ion 'of a portion of Parcel 1 of Par czl Map 7264 as recorded in Book 81, pages 62 and 63 of parcel maps, San Bernardino County, California; and WHEREAS, an August 30, 1985, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above-described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on November 27, 1985, the Planning Conmiss ion held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAHDNGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS fOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Ptan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2; Thai this project will not Create significant adverse environmentaTimpacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on November 27, 1985. SECTION 3; That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9416 is approved subject to the reconunendeo ondittons of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF NOVE;IBER, 1985. PLANNING LOMMISSIOII OF 7HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhfONGA ~6ennis L.~tout, airman ~ o'~ L. ( ~ ArrESr: ~~/_~c_r r, i3ra6 Bu er, eputy ecretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coimniss ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of November, 1985, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES: CO'CII SSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~01m { CITY Of RRNCHO CUCaMONGA RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROYAL i• LOCATION: East side of Haven Avenue between TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0; 9A16 High land and Leman Avenue GATE FILED: August 30, 1935 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1 of NUMBER OF LDTS: 10 Parcel Mao 7264 GROSS ACREAGE: 17.34 ASSESSOR PARCEL N0: 201-271-58 xtfftrRf f4Mf ie~Ai+Nf+,+r+ax+r+te+r44.,++,slfew+N+wxwf*:1w+,w+rxxw#w1rMl+rws,Mwtfrf;w+n+,rw+Ya#:M DEVELOPER 08NER ENGINEER/SURVEYOR Diversified Properties Same Anacal Engineers, Co. 2910 Red H{tl Avenue 1900 E. La Pa tma Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Anaheim, CA 92803 Improvement and dedication rerruirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Nunici0al Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: A. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map, % 2. Dedication shall be made Of the following rights-of-way on the following street: (measured from centerline) 37 total feet on Leman Avenue % _ 3. Corner property line radius will be reguired per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall he dedicated as follows: % 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and ,joint maintenance of all canon reads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.SR.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. ao~ N ( r X 6. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City 'cngineer's requirements. X 7. Easements for side~,va lk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 8. Street Improvements pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Cade, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map andlor building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half- section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: urb b rde- n ve treet treet A. Median Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Aopr. Trees Lights Overlay _[sland* Other Lemon Ave. X X X X X X Haven Ave. % % "*X X X X X *I ncludes landstap ing and irrigation on meter **Meandering Sidewalk X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-gay, fees shall be pafd and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay fer the relocation of any power Doles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 1. Existing Tines of less than 66KY fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. ~~~~ X 9. Street light Locations, as required, are to he approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. lights shall be on decorative poles ~.+ith-;. -underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Unders idewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. C. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording of parcel map. 2. Alien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit for each parcel. D. Drainage and Flood Control X 1. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shah Se required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall 6e made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. _X 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Cfty Engineer (refer to Special Conditions, No. 3). X 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed tp detain increased runoff , ao~ P E_ brad in X i, Grading of the subject property shalt be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. q soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. b. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval' by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. F. General Requireirents and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will 6e required as follows: X CalTrans for Hi bland Avenue San Bernardino ounty ood Contro District -JT- Cucamonga County Water Oistrict for Sewer and mater San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other X 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C,&R.s) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructnn. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water Ofstrict standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 5. This subdivision shall 6e subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans/San Bernardino County Fiood Control District, X 6, Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject td any requirements that may be received from them. ~ 0"1 Q i 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of sa^-e co=_s got guarantee that sewer treatment capacity ~xill Se avaiiao i= at the time building permits are requested. 'dhen builcing peniis ,f. are requested, the Cucamonga County 'dater District ~.vi 11 Se asked to certify the availability of capacity. Dermits will not 6e issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. local and tlas ter Planned Trails shall 6e provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating •.vidths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and •xeed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall 6e submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and/or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deppsit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cast of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82-1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of retarded moos and deeds used as reference and/or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 11. Notice pf intent to join the proposed Median Island Landscape District shall 6e filed with the City Council prier to recordation of the Final Map. G. Special Conditions X 1. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form and/or join Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in district formation shall be borne by the developer. X 2. Existing overhead utilities fronting the project wilt be required to 6e underground unless specifically waived 6y the Planning Coimni ssf on a5 a part of the review process. Undergrpunding tan be a lengthy process and if not coordinated at the earliest date may delay your project. X 3. Orainap^: a. A portion of Master Plan Storm Ora in Line 3-N, located to the north of the site, shall be Constructed with sufficient inlet capacity to accept a minimum of flow from the north within Naven Avenue to offset the increased flow generated by the development. Construction of this line shall replace the proposed retention basin. $: ~~1 b. Increased drainage from the first phase shall noc be directed to Highland Avenue, there crossing onto the private property to the south. It is acceptable to direct drainage to Haven Avenue by use of an interim earth berm or df tch, assuming line 3-H is in place. Subsequent ohases of the development of the development shall be designed to direct all flows from the site to future 14aster Plan 4-N located to the east. line 4-N shall be constructed with any future phases. % 4. Traffic and Rccess: a. A traffic signal shall be constructed at the intersection of Haven and Lemon Avenues, with the first Dhase, Cost of the design and construction shall be credited to Systems Development Fees. b. The pavement width of Lemon Avenue shall be as stated in the project Traffic Report. c. The interim access roadway connection to Highland Avenue shall 6e approved by Cal Trans. d. No development sMll occur On Parcel 4 u 0~u s eonflrms the final parcel size of Parcel 1 n freeway carrldor. 5. Gradfn a. Prior tc approval of the rough grading plan, the applicant shall coordinate grading plans with the adjacent apartment project to the east to provide a compatible grading solution which elimfnates any unnecessary retaining walls and/or slopes. . b. Reconfigure grading to prevent runoff from entering handicap ramps. CIlY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD/B~n./ HUDnB'S, CIyT~Y ENG.I~N^E,E~Rn ~ by' /fi7~l~ /~f 1 , ~~~'~Vl//y ~!/ a o"] 5 r"_~~_' .STBADLINO, Yocce, Csalsox & Rears . nworeaa~oes~ cowroe+non •. vn/.ouMe ow: "r~ :. ` 6riowr,tre .er Lyw .r,oca ..acc• c w ~t > . ein...o eea etwrowr cewtte owivq sm t ieoo ., ~~~~~ rv i0 :ui. ~'.nin:•e e .os. orr e wx>ee ~ . . ic o eoec•." u'~ ro wewnow>ee.ce. er.wonwu neeo~eui R c...., +". .oc ~ u`n .. roes: >RCnnOM[ pig Revoa0 °~ ~~ n <<ti .e >tivworvt P~.1 e.on0>a .n.aws o~eav c+~ .c..es uea.ew unean ~ W~~eM ~ Il ~).rt'.iOO c. u R[rwtw ,+n' w+e o .. nnereron n.x~ ~l ~ • V I,wu,+et O ip~0 [w ~[UC " ACM a OOr.i "ut.Kn ~Ut[. l4e nGawnt C M![w .q"Y p. ~ntiM1"o Hne["o.t. ° ^ (714) 725-4140 n~we+~.,e. IX,1 ,. t~,,.u~sotn .. YOrOAUbe e~Nwei. y .tt"d, n~ Wor p+np.v a e~ttex 01+[. ~. F~~N.wlcn Awq q.wc~tnow ~ 000..>e. w+e ".C~. +e~ee ,eee e xt.wr,. Ilet{T V C OrMN .. ere+„ .w t, uvln Nwn I. GxxOF November 11, 1991 alaap~~ NOV 12 1991 mm~a VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Honorable Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dtive Post office eoi 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Ae: Diversified Shopping Center's Appeal Of Development/ Design Review 89-15: Phase III of Naven Village Shopping Center Dear Members of the City Council: This office represents Diversified Shopping Centers ("Diversified") in connection with its application for Development/Design Review of Phase III of the Haven Village Shopping Center (Development/Design Review 69-15) pu rsuartt to Section 17.06.010 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On June 26, 1991 the Planning Commf ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No.91-78 approving the application subject to numecous conditions. In connection with the appeal filed by Diversified pursuant to Section 17.02.080 ~ t~"1 1 Honorable Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga November 11, 1991 Page Two of the Code, we submit this letter as a formal objection to two of those conditions. For your convenience we set forth the full text of each of those conditions below: Condition No. 9. The eaisting overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Naven Avenue shall be unde rg rounded from the existing terminus south of the southerly driveway to the first pole south of the Caltrans right-of-way for the Route 30 Ereeway prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City'S adopted cOSt for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street and south of Route 30. Services crossing Naven Avenue shall 6e placed underground at the same time as the main line. If the developer can obtain, prior to the issuance of building permits, assurance from Caltrans that the utilities will be undergrounded by and at Caltrans' expense upon construction of the freeway, this requirement will 6e waived. Condition No. 5. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the ezisting overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of Highland Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City's adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Haven Avenue to the east project boundary, The development application !o which these conditions apply concerns only 14,800 square feet (the final two buildings) of the over 140,000 square foot project. Because there is no reasonable relationship between the conditions imposed and construction of the final two buildings in Haven Village, the City is without authority to impose Condition Nas. 4 and 5. ~~~ U Honorable Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga November 11, 1991 Page Three The legal basis for imposing exactions as a eondiiion of development, such as dedications, improvements, and developer fees, is the police power authority set forth in Article XI, § 7 of the California Constitution. (Candid Enterorises Inc. v. Grossmont Union Hiah School District, 39 Ca1.3d 878, B85 (1985), Trent Meredith, Inc. v. City of Oanard, 114 Ca1.App.3d 317, 325 (1981), and Associated Homebuilders Etc., Inc., 18 Ca1.3d SB2 (1976).) Although [he California Constitution confers broad authority upon municipalities to impose exactions as conditions to approval of development, such authority is not without limitation. In this case, the City has exceeded its authority. The most important limitation on the City'S exaction power is the "rational relationship" ("nexus") requirement. The California Constitution, as interpreted by California courts, requires that any ezaction imposed by a public agency as a condition to development of property must bear a rational relationship to the public needs created by the proposed development. In Remnenaa v. California Coastal Commission, 163 Ca1.App.3d 623, 627 (1985), the Second District Court of Appeal described the nexus requirement in the content of a [equi[ed property dedication as follows: "If as a condition to receipt of a permit, the applicant must donate property for a public use that bears no relationship to the benefit conferred on the applicant or the burden imposed on the public, there is a taking of property without payment of just compensation in violation of the United States Constitution. This is the basis Eor California court decisions invalidating such conditions.' The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the news requirement in Rohn v. City of Visalia, 214 Ca1.App.3d 1463 (1989) and held that the City of visalia engaged in an unconstitutional "taking" of the property owners' land when it conditioned issuance of a building permit for development of a 2a~ V Honorable Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga November 11, 1991 Page Four professional office building upon dedication of fourteen percent of the land to correct the misalignment of streets. The court found no nexus ezisted between the dedication requirement and the proposed development because there was nothing in the record indicating that the dedication was required because of increased traffic from the development. As ezplained by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Liberty v, California Coastal Commission, 113 Ca1.App.3d 491, 502-504 (1980), the policy demanding the nexus requirement applies to all types of exactions and not just dedication requirements. 'Where the conditions imposed are not related to the use being made of the property but are imposed because the entity conceives a means of shifting the burden of providing the cost of a public benefit to another not responsible for or only remotely or speculatively benefiting from it, there is an unreasonable ezercise of the police power. .to impose the burden on one property owner to an eztent beyond his own use shifts the government's burden unfairly to a private party." In Commercial Builders of Northern California v City of Sacramento, 91 Darly Journal D.A.R. 9609 (August B, 1991), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the nezus test in a developer fee contezt. The court stated: •NOllan [v. California Coastal Commission 483 U.S. 825 (1987)] holds that where there is no evidence of a nexus between the development and the problem that the ezaction seeks to address, the ezaction cannot be upheld." Commercial Builders, at 9611. Imposition of Condition Nos. 4 and 5 is invalid because no nexus ezists between the requitement that Diversified underground utilities located on property that does not front Haven Village and the public needs creaked by the project. We do not argue that the City lacks a legitimate inte[est in advancing the purposes of the City's Development Code, which include: 'promot[ing] high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the physical, economic, and social character of Rancho Cucamonga." (Code $ 17.06.O10A.) To that end, Diversified has already undergrounded all a:fisting ~o~ uJ Honorable Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga November 11, 1991 Page Five utilities fronting the Haven Village shopping center along Haven Avenue in compliance with the City's approval of the parcel map for Haven Village in 1985. However, imposition of Condition Nos. 9 and 5 constitutes use of an impe[missible means to advance that interest because the proposed development does not create a need for underg rounding of utilities on adjacent property which does not front Haver. Village. In fact, there was no record created before the Planning Commission showing that the proposed development of Haven Village contributes to the need for underg rounding utilities on Caltrans property. The City is attempting to shift the burden of providing the cost of a public De nefit from Caltrans to Diversified. In sum, it is impossible to understand how the undergrounding of utilities on neighboring property addresses concerns regarding the aesthetic appeal of Haven Village. Condition Nos. 4 and 5 do not reduce any visual clutter which might be caused by the proposed development or ensure high quality design of the physical structure to be located on Diversif ied's property. Certainly, the City may proceed with its plan to develop an aesthetically appea]ing community, but only at its own expense, and not at the ezpense of Diversified. Burdening the Haven Village project with such costs makes development of the project economically infeasible and may force Diversified to abandon the project. CONDSTION N0. 5 VIOLATES THE CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENT FEE LAW BECAUSE NO NEXUS EXISTS. In 1987, the California legislature enacted a Development Fee Law (Government Code $§ 66000 et seg.) (the "Act") which restricts the City's power to impose fees unrelated to particular burdens created by a proposed development, unrestricted as to what public facilities they are to be used for, and unlimited as to the time in which they must De spent. The Act fleshes out the news requirement and requires the City to make specific findings whenever a •fee" is imposed as a condition to approving a "development proiect" Eor the purpose of financing •puhlic facilities." In short, before the City could legally impose the fee under Condition No. S, ik was required to: ~o~ x Honorable Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga November 11, 1991 Page Six (1) Identify the purpose of the fee. (2) Identify the use to which the fee will be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified. (3) Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the Eee is imposed. (4) Determine how there i5 a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. (Government Code f 66001(a) (1-4).) Only if Chese four findings were made and Supported 6y evidence in khe record, could a proper "nexus" between development of the Haven Village project and the undergrounding being financed by the Eee exist. The undergrounding fee imposed under Condition No. 5 is within the definition of "fee" and the undergrounding of utilities is included in the definition of 'public facilities" as a public improvement. Therefore, the City may not legally impose Condition No. 5 because the City did not make the findings required by the Act to establish the proper nexus. Resolution No. 91-78, conditionally approving Diversified's application, contained no such findings. we understand that the Planning Commission previously adopted Resolution No. 87-96 establishing a policy for the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities. Still, because Resolution No. 87-96 contains none of the findings required by the Development Fee Law and because a proper nexus does not exist to levy a fee against Diversified in this instance, application of the "Policy' in the Resolution is, likewise, invalid. Even iE the policy was valid, by its very terms, Resolution No. 87-96 does not requite payment of the in lieu Eee by Diversified. The City's policy only requires undergrounding of utilities "adjacent to and within the limits of a development." Condition No. 5 violates the first prong of this aa~ Y Honorable Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga November 11, 1991 Page Seven policy and requires payment of an in lieu fee for undergrounding of utilities on a neighboring property which is not adjacent to the Naven Village development. Because the proper nexus does not exist between Condition Nos. 4 and 5 and the proposed development, imposition of the conditions expressly violates California Law. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga wants to advance the purposes stated in its Development Code by undergroundi ng utilities along Highland Avenue, California Law requires the City to pay for it. Because the City is without authority to impose Condition Nos. 4 and 5, they should be deleted from the approval of Development/Design Review 89-15. Very truly yours, STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON S RADTH /~~, ~, ~ G~-,~ s~ Thomas P. Clark, Jr. ~/ RVB/jak ca: John O'Meara City Manager City Attorney City Engineer Director of Planning and Development 7967u/3610/074 ~O ~ Z RESOLUTION N0. 87-96 A RESOLUi[Ui OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA ESTABLISHING A REVISED PIX,ICY FOR THE UN DERGROUN DING OF E%ISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND REPEALING RESOLUTIOI N0. 86-11 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to repeal Resolution No. 86-77 which was adopted on the 28th day of May, 1986 and establish the revised policy contained herein; NHEREAS, the Planning Conmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and living en virorment within the City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property owners and developers of the City goal. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all developments, except those contained in Section 7 and any others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal of the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follars: 1. Lines on the project side of the street*: a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the developer's expense. b. In those circunstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as a short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvenents, etc., the Developer shall pay an in-lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cast of undergroundfng from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. 2, Lines on the o osite side of the street from the ro ect: The Developer s a pay a ee tote ity or one- a amount per ection 6. 3, Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with ect on a ve an e e igi a or reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street. 4, Pale lines containin 66KV or lar er electricai lines: All lines shall be un ergroun a or in- eu ees poi n actor ante w section 1, 2 or ;, above, except for G6 KV or larger electrical lines. a o-~ ~A 5. Limits of Responsibilities• a. In-lieu fees shall De based upon the length of the property being developed from property line to property line (the center of adjacent streets for corner properties). b. Undergrounding shall include the entire project frontage and extend to: (1) the first existing pole off-site from the project boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (2) a new pole erected at a project boundary (across the street for corner properties), or (3) an existing pole within 5 feet of a project boundary, except at a corner. 6. Fee Rmount: The amount for in-lieu fees shall equal the length (per basedouponainformationesupplied byttbe tility canpanieshandias updated periodically as deemed necessary. 7. Ex~empLions: The following types of projects shall be exempt from this po it cy: a. The addition of functional equipment to existing developments, such as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air conditioners, coaling towers, enclosure of an outdoor storage area, parking and loading areas, black walls and fences, etc. b. Building additions ar new free Standing buildings of less than 25% of the floor area of the existing building(s) on the sane assessor's parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichever is less. c. Exterior upgrading ,or repair of existing developments, such as: reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc. d. Interior tenant improvements and non-construction CUP s. e. The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel. f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utility easenents with a heavy concentration of services to adjacent developments, and the utility lines are 500' or more iron the right of way line of a special Boulevard. g. Residential subdivisions of four or fewer single family residential parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600' off site from both the project boundaries and the adjacent property is not likely to contribute to future under grounding. * All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel rights-of-way, etc. ~o~ ~~ APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JLME 1987. PLANNING CIN~ISSIQI OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUfAMRIGA ~ n 1 ~. ~ I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Camalssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Camelsston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cametsslon held on the 10 day of June, 1987, by the follortng vote-to-rit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK. CHITIEA, MCNTEL NOES: COMMISSI4NERS: TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HONE ABSTAIN': COMMISSIONERS: BIAKESLEY a o~ ~c RESOLUTION N0. 88-180 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCII. OP IfiE CITT OP RANQiO CUGlDNGA. GLIR7RNiA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO 87-2d3 AND ESTABL15HING A REVISED SCHEWLE 0! PEES IIFLIW 0! UNDEAGRW NDING ffiTSTI/T, WERNEAD OTII.ITY LINRS WHEN R~UIRED BY PLANNING COMlQ5520N APPRWAL W!D'REAS, the City ie in receipt of inforfaHon frw the Southern California Edison Coapauy indicatinE chat the averap coat o! uader8rounainE electrical lino hu decrtued dw to as IOternal Rvenw Service rul SnE concemin8 the 1986 Taz Retort AGt. NOfi, TREREARE, EE IT RESQ.VED h7 the City Council of the Ciq of Rancho Cuewonp, California ehae the unit wount (per linear tooU to M chaged for free in-lieu of uader8roundieE a:iatlni overhead electrical liner shall be a fol love dope ndinE upon then the dtecud ueiliq lines were (err so bel underjrouaded, Tice Period 1986 and before 1987 1988 and attar Unit Amount/L! $100 $135 $128 P~e• prev loualy collected in ezpp of the above wounu aball be refunded co the peyu in ae ezpeditioue a ueoer a tndble. it is i• not pouible co locau the payee, the ezcu• funds shall b• enndernd to the City Gntral Fund. The unit uounu toe the ocher util itiu shall twain •t she current races of S75.00 for '&lepbone and 510.00 for C~bl• P. reapetivdy. PASSED, APPROVED, sad ADOPTED this 6th day o! April. 1988. AYESe Eroen, EuQwt. Stout, Rini, NriBht NOES= NOM AE SENT: NOM ~ YY'' ~T~~ Dennis L. Scout, lYyot ~o"I AO Resol ur ian `!o. 98-:90 Pa ee 1 n, ~y;~ -4tps..,~ ATTEST: ~~.`}~%~ 7 8werly/A. Aucbelat, City Clark I. EEVERLY A. AOTAELET. CLTS CLERK o! eha Ciq of Rancho Cucuon8a, f~l ito«Sa, do he«by areity chat the tora8oia8 baolutioa vu duly paeaed. approtad, and adopted tp the Ciq Covacil et the City of Rancho Cucuonp, Cal itornia, at a «autar eeetin8 of wid City Couecil held oe xhe 6th day of April. 1988. Executed ehia 7th day of April. 1988 at Rancho Cucreep, C~1 iloreia. Eeeerly Au[heiee, City Clark aD~ ~~ Choi McNiel re nod the public nearing. . . . . « The P1 ninq C sion isceued free 9:10 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. 0. M1JIRONM_NTA.~ ASSE SNENT ANO DE~^'LOPIS-NT ILVIEW 59-15 - pIVERSIFIED - Ths development of Phase III of a neighborhood commercial ahopp Lng center con/ieting of two retail building/ totaling 16,800 square feet on 12.96 acre/ of land within an approved ahoppinq center in the Neighborhood commercial Dieeriet, locnietl at the northaaat corner of Xeven end Highland Avenue• - APN: 201-271-65 and 71. Staff recommend/ iuuanw of a Negat Lve Declaration. (Coot Lnued fran June 12, 1991.) Jerry Guarracino, Anistant planneY, presented [M /taf[ sport and mgguttl that Standard Condit ioro N1 and N6 be rwU/d t0 [der to Naven Avenue. Chairman McNlel opened the public hearing. John O'Meara Dlvealtied Shopping Centre, 2910 Rad X111, Co/ta Mua, stated they had developed the tM ahoppinq center in 1986 and had undergrounded 1,200 feet of eUCtrlcal lines along Haven Avenue at that time. Ne objected to the adtliClonal undergrounding requirement along Xeven, including tM negssity to reurvice a houu acroo the strut from the center and the requlzement for in-lieu fee• for future undergrounding along Highland. Xe pco~ected the Naven undergrounding would cost 5200,000 and the in-live fq would W approximately 580,000. He commsnted that the current bu lldinge only comprise about 8 perw ne of the ahoppinq center. He requutd thaC the fee be waived beceu/e they had completed all undergrounding requ lrement• requested Sn 3986 and Call lane will have to complete tM underground lnq when they con/truct the freeway. Xe said tM land i/ Da/ically Caltren• land. He said the new undergrounding nquiruent• would eo Llnancially impact the pro]ect i[ may preclude ever finLhing the center. Ne Nid tMlr underetandlnq had Dun that Lhey urely needed to return for deign review for the additional hulldings and he /aw no connection between completing the Lwo buildings end the undergrounding nquizeunts. Nr. O'Meara nquutd that tMy be permitted to build the new tn/h enc lo/ure to the /amt epecitieat loN a/ the current fresh encloacru Ln the zeulnder of the venter. Ne ^aid the uclo/ure i• locatd behind the center and would Da out of pu611c vLew. Xe suggested they add e pedestrian accu• Lo tM new tteeh enclosure Dut felt the additional requirement^ were excueiw. He requested that EnginurlDq Condit tone 1 through 3 and standard Contl It loos regard log the Haven Avenue median, strut imprawunt on the ust aide of Hewn, and ncon/truetion of the wuther ly drive approach on Hewn Avenue reference that Che condition/ are consLtent with the approved conditions for the Nc0onald•e improvement^ which are already bonded. Ne nquntd that Standard Condition D2 rdsrence that the requirements be per the development plan/ alruey submittd. He commented that Standard Conditions 616, 617, M6, M6, Nl, and NI are dupllut condit LOM with the McDonald approval. Planning Commie ion Mlnute• /Sd~ June 26, 1991 ~D1 (kF Chairman McNiel asked Harrye Hanson, 5¢nior Civil Engineer, to confirm that the conditions contained in both the McDOnald'a approval and the current project requirements era consistent. Mr. Hanson responded off innattvely. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated that City Council had est abl ishetl a policy regarding the construction of trash enc losuru tluring the development of the NuWest Shopping Censer and had directed staff to apply those standards to all Nture commercial shopping canter development. Nearing no further testimony, Chairman HeNlel closed the public hearing. Commies toner Melchor comewnted that the Ciiy has elecbd not to construct the medisn an Haven Ln the arse because it will be torn out by Celtrans in Cho process of developing the freeway. He was sympathetic to the requut to deists the requirement Lo underground the utllitles along Haven. CommLeioners Vellette and ToLtoy agrgd. chairmen McNiel stated that Lf the policy had been in platy when the shopping cenlK wu originally developed, tN developer would haw been required to underground the entire aru. Hs agaed that the undergroundinq that remains i• not in relai ionehip to tM remainder of the development of tN center, but rather in relationship to CN entire center. He thought the dewlogr had sueceufully deferred undergroundinq which otherwise would haw been required. Commi a toner Vellette asked SE the undergrounding would hays to De disturbed when Celtrans builds the freeway. Chairman McNlel ruponded Chat could not be determined at thL time. He commsnGd that since the original center was Duilt, the policy has changed to requ Sre Lhai Lrash encloeurs^ be decidedly enhanced because of problems with some trash enclosures. He eked how tM CammLeioner• felt about the developer's requut to match the ezlstinq enc lawru. commLetaner Melchor felt tM develo[»r should De permitted to match the ezlstinq trash enclosures with the addition of a pedestrian access. commLeioner Vellette reporUd that the Design Awisw Committee Considered that the nor of the building i^ wceued vls • pedestrian walkway Erom the apartment camplsxes bshlnO the center. She said the Committee felt the enclowrs should be consistent with the new policy. Commlolonsr ToLtoy [sit that It the enclosure is in view of pedestrians from the apartment complex, It should be constructed sccordinq to the new standards. Chairman McNlel commented Ghat tM new encloeurs• ere du Lgnad to alleviate problems caused by the wind picking up the Crash. Planning Commlu ion Minute ~ June Z6, 1991 ~0~ ACS Commies icner Helcher agreed the enclosure ahculd be updatetl. He commented that the center currently has parking lot lighting which doeb not conform to standards bsceuae of an omission when the center was built. Ha wondered if there had been any consideration given to requiring that the lighting be revised to meet atandartls. Mr. Buller responded the Leeue had not D¢en considered. Motion: Moved 6y Valletta, seconded by Melchor, to iesuo a Negat lve Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Development Review 89-15 with the deletion of Engineering Condition 4 requiring undergrounding of utilitio along Maven Avenue, Chairman McNUl reibrated that the undergrounding nqulrement L concision[ with policy and L not inconeisbnt with what may occur in the Cuture. Mr. Hanson stated that staff tlou noC feel that Calirans will provide the undergrounding along Haven. Ha commented it i• expecUd that Calirans will leave as many lLne^ above Lha ground as possible. Xa indicated that if the utilities are already underground when the frasusy is constructed, Gltranc will certainly have to keep the lines underground end replace soy damaged lines. Ha said the City will have to provide a certain amount of money to conrtruct ihs freeway end requiring tM developer to underground would save the Clty money. He old it U doubtful that tM lino along Hlghlend can W undergrounded in their present location and that was why statf had recommended the use of an in-lieu fee. commis loner YoLtoy asked Lf a frowsy of framp is pLnnsd for the area. Mr. Henwn reps led two ramps era proposed for the arse but staff dou not have a project proposal Erom Gltrans ss yet. commissioner Valletta modified her motion to deleL Enq lnesring Conditions 5 a• well as Condition d. Commluion¢t Melehsr withdgw his wcond. Motion died for lack of • second. Mot tan. Moved Dy McNiel to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the rewlut ion approving Environmental Aueument and Development Awiew 89-15 wLih Enginaerinq Condit loos 4 and 5 Lntact as written sod with provision thnt Engineering Division confirm that standard eondit loos ap consistent with the Mcoonald•• approval. Motion died for lack of s second. Commissioner Valletta esbd the cost for undergrounding on Highland only. chairman McNiel felt tM cost is not ralwant 6ecsuo the developer had been relieved of tM cost during construction of Phases I and II. He though! Lha undsrgroundlnq will occur end the developer should pay their fair than incGad of leaving the burden Go the CS[y. Commissioner Valletta Lhought the cost of undergrounding may prohibit the developer from completing Phaw III end [Mrs i• alw the pouLbility the Planning Commission Minutes ~ June Z6, 1991 2 0 "~ {~~! linen would be movetl a[ the time of tlevelopment of the freeway. Shn Eelt the City needs to be sure the Dueineae needs of the community are met. Hr. cuarracino commented that Engineering Condition 5 would only require payment of a fee and the lines would not be undergrounded until it becomes more practical to do eo, perhaps at the time of construction of the freeway. Commissioner Val lette again asked the coat for the undergroundinq. Mr- Hannon responded that staff does not normally calculate those coet• for the Planning Commieaion mating, because It hoe been the Camsigion'• policy to require the undergroundinq for conaietency regardleee of the coat. Chairman NcNlal commented that undetgrountlinq i• a coat o[ doLnq bu eiNu similar eo providing curb and gutter. Hr said the City has a goal to underground utilit tae wherever poui63e tegardlee• of coat. Commieetonat Valletta asked if the utilit tea are on Coltrane land or on land within the project. Mr. Hanson replied [My are on Calttana land, but Clty policy ha been to underground utility 11Na adjecant to dsvelopaunt, even Lt Lt is an railroad land or public right-obwry land. Chairman McNial conasanUtl that dwelopare adjapnt to wuhu underground to the opposite alder of the wash. Ha wondered if it would be pooible to nqulre an in-lieu tea for the undergroundinq along Hsvan. He sekad the baai• for determining in-lteu feet. Mr. Ha neon replied tMy would De computatl at today's costs. Chairman McNlel commented cha City would than have to make up cha difference Detwen the coaC of undargroundlnq at todsy'• rates and the ultimate cost at the time the undargrounding ie performed. Commiuionar Vallatb sekad tt the undargroundlnq on Highland was originally part of the oondition o[ approval [or Phase III or if it was just now being added. Mr. Hanson replied that Lhs undergroundinq was not a condition o[ the original overall project bscaute the policy wee a%panded afGr the original shopping canter wu built. commissioner Melchor eGted that typically the undargroundlnq extends to tM first pole tooth of Lhe applicant's property or to tM faY •Ltla of the right of usy i! the property abuts an existing right of way. He thought tna applicant had already compiled with that conditLOn becaub the right of way co the couch le not an exLetlnq r19ht of way, but merely someone •lee'e lane. Mr. Hanson KnNd cha CommLdon had estahllsha0 a precedence In at Last three other ceps. He uid two rates involved an In-lieu Eu and wen Planning Commie ion Hlnutas +1~.- Sune 26, 1991 ~o'I A~ appealed to the City Council. Ne reported Lhe City Council hed upheld the Planning Commiseion'• decision. Notion: Moved by NcNisl, seconded by Tolat oy, to ie cue a Negative Declaration and adopt the reeolut ion approving Environmental A9aessment and Development Review 89-19 with Engineering Conditions 4 and 5 Sntaet a• written end with provision that Engineering Division confirm that standard candltians are cone ietent with the McDOnald'• approval. Motion failed to carry by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MELCNER, VALLETTE ABSENT: COMNISSIONER6: CNITSEA -failed to carry Motion: Moved by Melchar, to iuw a Nsgatiw Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Development Review 89-15 with Engineering conditlon d deleted and with provision Lhat Engineering DiviLLon contlrn Lhat standard conditlon• are consistent with the McDOnald•• approval. Motion died for lack of s second. commissioner ToLtoy asked for rational for ddetlan of Enginorinq conditlon 6 and not 5. Commiuioner Melchar responded that the Clty has determined not io huild the median in the scratch where CM freeway will be built becaub the median may be altered by Calirana. Na therefore Otd not feel it was fair to ask the developer to work on Maven Avenw when the City i• not willing to spend the money to Dulld the median. Chairman McNiel asked if it would be pouibL to auu• an in-llw [ee ai a percentage ratio of the ultimate coat rather than a fixed dollar rat lo. Ralph Manson, Deputy City ALtornay, responded that the Ln-lieu tae would bs collecud at the time o! Luuanee of building permits for the project. Motion: Moved by McNiel, geonded Dy Tolstoy, to loos t Negative Declaration and adopt the ruolutlon approving Bnvironmengl Auusment and Dwelopmant 0.aview 09-15 with aMldificat ion to collect an Ln-lieu fee for the undergroundlnq of utllitLn along Navan Avenue and with the provLlan that Engtnurinq contlrm Chat standard conditlon• era consistent with the McDOnald's approval. Motion tailed to carry Dy the following vote: AYESt COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MELCNER, VALLSTTE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CNIT IEA -fal lad Lo carry Commlu loner Valletta suggoted the item be continued until Commissioner Chitin returned from vacation. Plann inq Commission Minutes ~j~ June Z6, 1991 X01 {~~ Commissioner Melchor caked it there «ae a possibility of getiinq a conceptual answer from caltrans regarding how they plan to deal with the land in the future. Barrye Hanson responded that staff could make the request of Coltrane but it would probably take a long time to get an answer. Commies inner Molcher suggested rho cond iiion 6e reworded to waLw tM boa artd requirement Eor undargroundinq if the applicant con Ld tlenwnsirata with some reasonaDL ptobabil Lty that Csltrane will pay for the undargrounding et the time they construct the freeway. Motion: Moved by Melchor, seconded by Tolstoy, to iuuo a Negative Declare[ ion and adopt the resolution approving Environmental Aseosomont end Development Review 89-19 with modlfieetion to waive Engineering Condlticn 6 requiring Haven Avenue undargroundinq if, prior [o the itouance of building psrmito, the applicant can provide assurance from caltrano that the util Ltiee will be undorgrounded at Calitans oxpenu upon construction of rho freeway and with the provision that Engineering confirm that otandard cond LtioN are consLtont with the McDOnald'• approval. Motion carrLd by the following vet •: AYES: COMM ISSIONEAS: MCNIEL, MELCHEA, TOLSTOY NOES: COMM I93IONERS: VALLETTE , ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA -carried • . ~ ~ w H " - The request utablieh a church d school !n • locoed apace of 8,629 equar net within an existing Lw park on 12.59 acres of lend In rho ffice Proton tonal zone, locat at 10601 Church Strut - APN• 1077-421-31. S[nff recommendo lssu • of a Negative DoeLration. Jerry Guarracino, Chairman McNLl coked whet ply percentage of the parking ana le etafL report. CM pro]oct L leued end what Hr. cuarracino rupondod appro ately percent of the pro]ect L loud end the remainder of Cho build 1• duigna ae off lco opaco aG one epoco per 250 square foot. He re od thou curnntl • an overage of parking for the two phaws which hav eon built. Ho comment Ghat prier to dwelopmtnt of Phaoa II2 rho d epee will have to eubmlG a viood o1N plan Lndicat ing Buff icient pa ng i• available. Chal McNlol opened the public hearing. Planning Conmiaolon Mlnutu r~ Jum 28, 1991 ~~~ C[1'Y OF RANCHO CL'CAJfOtiGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 26, 1991 T0: Chairman and Hembe ra of the Planning Coasiaaion FROM: Bred Bullet, City Planner BY: Jerry Guarraelno, Aaei atant Planner SDBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVEIlJPNENT REVIEN 89-15 - DIVERSIFZED - The davelopsent of PMee IIL of a neighborhood commerclnl shopping center conaiatlnq of two retell buildings Loinlinq 14,800 equate feet on 12.% acres of land within an approved ehopplnq center in the Neighborhood Co®ercial Distrlet, located aC the northeast corner o[ Hsven and Highland AVenuee - APN: 201-271-65 and 71. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Rsqueated: Approval oC Dstai lad Siie Plan and 8levationa and iaegance oL a Negative Dwlesation. 9. Surrounding Und Use and Zoning: North - 91ngL ~ Easily hostll Low 14sidaniial 0lsitict 12-{ dwelling unite per acre) south - Vacant (Route 70 right-oiway)1 taw Peaidantial District (2d dwelling unite par acre) Eset - Apartsenur lNdius-tllgh Residential Distrlci (1h2{ dralling unit per acn) Neat - Vacant, Condosd.nluY, Ws station) Office professional: Low-Mediae ResidanlSal DiatriM (d-e dwelling units par acre), Neighborhood Commercial C. General Plan Deeignstions: Protect SSU - NeighboMOOd Cas~ereLl North - Iaw Dane Sty Residential (2-1 dwelllnq unit per acre) South - Low Density Maidentlal l2-{ dre111ng uniu per acre) East - Medlus-High Density Pesidentiel (1{-2{ dwal ling units par acre) Nest - Office Profudonal, Low-NSdius Density Residential ({-e dwelling unit per sere), Neighborhood Coeaerclel ITEM C. PLANNING CDEY45510N STAFF REppRT OR 89-15 - DIVESLFIED June 26, 1991 Pa qa 2 D. Site Characteristics: The site is rough graded rich turf as etoa ron control. South of the project site is the future interchange of the proposed Foothill Freeray. E. Parkins Calcu lationa: Number of Number of Type Square Patking Spaces Spaces of Vae Foote s Patio Re Wired Provided Retail No. 3 11,700 1/250 45 45 Commercial Pad 3x600 1/250 14 14 Eziating Center minus proposed McDOnald's 91,190 1/250 360 366 Vni on 76 2,700 J*7 per Day 11 it Restaurant Uees 8,000 1/100 80 80 Total 514 514 IT• BACKGROUND: Thle project rse originally [clad as Dwelopment Review 88-10 'end ineluded commercial bul ldin9 no. 7, retail no. 3 and the site upon which McOonald's ru aventwlly approval. In October of 1990, the applieant vi Ndrew Development Review SS-10 in favor of two Nparste applications: (1) Conditional Uee Permit 83-10 for the McDonald'• restaurant, and (2) Development Review 89-15 [or comercial building no. 7 and retail no. 1, (this applicationl• In Navembez of 1990, the applicant requested a continwnca from she Design 14vtew Co-SttN mNtin9 scheduled for November 77, 1990, to reaeeee• eAe project in light of the current econamlc chub. Tha proj set rNSined inaetlw until March 7, 1991, et rhich eisw the Projeet rN rwieved by the Design Review Coe•SLtN. III• ANALYSIS: A. Cwneral: The pro}act Ss Phase III of the Haven Village Shopping Center. On September 24, 1986, the Planning Cosseieeion conditionally approved this Phase IIi Conceptual Site Plan. The daWloper is nor nquMting development rev rev of the Deeailed Slta Plan and elevations [or tro retail bul ldings as shorn in the setached izhibib. This proposal is generally consiatant with the approved Conwptwl Stu Plan. ~ D ~I 14 YY1 PLANNING COMM 255IJN STAFF REWJ RT __ DR 89-15 - DIV ESI FIED June 26, 1991 +e Tne proposed McDonald's (Conditional Use Permit 88-18) was approved by the Planning Commission on November 29, 1989. The current propose] will provide a continuation of the pedestrian connections from the satellite buildings to the main pro?act. Also, additional plaza apace with shade cover has been provided on the south side of retail no. 3. _f a t a H. Design Review Committee: The Co®ittee IMeNiel, Tol st oy, ure Coleman) reviewed the project on April 21, 1988, and recommended approval with Conditions. At the request of the applicant vho desired to change the col oz scheme, the Deai gn Review Committee zevieved the modified plena, which ref le eted the prev loos conditions. the Committee (Chitiea, Valletta, Rroutil) again reco®ended approval aubj act to the following conditions: 1. Regarding the repainting of the existing center, the Committee recommended wing Amertone taa9P Taupe for the wood aiding and all ghtly darker version of Draper Taupe (custom mix) for the trim color. A test panel is to be prepared for staff review and final approval Sn the f laid. 2• The eloped roof element should be crontinusd ecroes the entire south elevation of retell no. ] and crap around the east elevation 26 feet. 3. Spandrel glade should ba wed to form a corner window treaimeni et the eouthaaat corner of retell no. 3. 0. M open lattice trsl li• should be provided over the acatinq area south of retail no. 3. 5. A dsnu landscape ecrasn should ba wed to prevent gralfitL on the rear al da oC retail no. 7. 6. River rock vantat should be wed in place of T-itt aiding in the arse adjacent Lo planLts rhea irrigatimn over spray rill cause excessive wear, Sn., under the vindov on tM south side of retafl no. ), also, under the windows on the south aide of retafl no. 2. 7. River rock veneer should be extended past the pedestn an door on the east elevation of retail no. 2 to better E came the doorway. B. A half-wall of rivet rock should be provided on the wesc elevation o£ stall no. 2 between the south corner of the but ldinq and the pedestrian door to tie in with the ri:~r rock under the windows on the south elevation of building. ~~~1 ~N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 89-15 - DIVEBIyIED June 26, 1991 Pa qe a 9. The doors to the electrical closest should match those approved for NtDOnald's. (Conditional Use Permit 88-18.~ The app li<ant has revised Lhe elevation and Site Plan and has satisfied the conditions of approval recommended by the Design Review COmmitteea• C. Environmental Aeseaement: Staff has completed Part II of Che Environmental Checklist and found that no significant adverse environmental impacts will occur as a result of Lhis project. Aa a result, the SneuanCe of a Negative Declaration ie recommended. (Please note that a Negative Declaration wan also Saeued for the previously approved Conditional Dse Permit for this shopping center on April 2d, 1985.) IV. FACT5 FOR FINDINGB; The proj act L consLteni witA tM General Plan, Che objectives of the Development Code, and [Ae purpoq of the dlatlfct in which the /its is located. Thm proposed use and Bice Plan, Gogethet rith the mnditione applicable thereto will not be detrimental to the public healU, ufety, or relfare or materially injurious to prop/rL1es or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed ux and Site Plans together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with each of the applicable provisioeu of the Developent Cods end City etanderds. V. CORRBEPGNDENCE: This item has bxn advert Led as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dally Bulletin newspaper, tM property has been posted, end nos ices wer• cent to all property owners vithtn 70D feet of tM project /SN. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Statf Ncoamenda the PLnnlnq Co~issian approve Development Wviev 89-IS and Suue a Negative Declaration. Reapec y /ubmitbd Brad er City P anner BB:JG:mlg Attachments: 6xhlbit "A" - Approved Master Plan Exhibit "B" - Si to Plan 6xhlbit "C" -Elevations Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Resolution of Approval rith Standard Conditions d~~ ~~ ~L ~ _ ~~ \ ~ 1 ~' _ ~ ~:' II ,~~,•. ' ~ ~~. ~~ R'~--•- ~il"~$ ~.n--. ~ :---.•-...~ ~i~vi ~ - ,„ ~~ M1"~ 3 r r" w y ~~ E+ ~. f:7 ~ ... a x .~, F W z 0 ~z U ~ ~ > U '" A Oxz ~~~ U f~ a a~Rp - ~~-? .; i ~i.Mit =a Y:.9 (~, eySi 6 ~. ^IC ~ ;, ~ ~ I e ~ : Y ~1 _. 5 [i9 ` ' _ _ _ ~~ S~,i _ v ~1! V ~~~- '{S.r ~ t T ..jam' ~ ; _ -_ - • i ~ e i~ _ i - \ ~ • ~I~ ~ { ~~ > ~ - ~t :~ ~~.i i ~ ' it ~ ~ .. e i' Y 3~ 2 s r r ~C ~ ° (EMi ;~ ----_, ~ , i. i ~ 'i i ~~~$ ' ~; sl' "'_ ~ r~ a 8C ~ ! nia 1 ~ ) ~ I' c. ~~j- ~ ~I c~ i 3I5 i~ I u 'u'+ ' ° ~i 7 i q I ,~ 1.! 7~ ~S I "' r I a l ~_ Ia~Y i i4 ~ ~;r ~ i i "I ', ` I .,. i ~ . , ,'. ~ ~ a,~ II'~iI --~ .~l r~ ,1. ;~ _, r'_ ,;•. I '`,~'~ ' "ji c 'ice r' ~:',t ~`~'~.i. . S' i. . ~; r,, ~.-~ _ _., °hrl ~ij ..~•{.` ~ .... .. ; ~ ' ni , ~,,'a< ;> ~ ~ -__ Q'~ e: --,~ ~ . ,.~ .~1 x ~ p - _ ~ ~ C - ~~.'~1~ .. / ~ 1 i , 1 A ~ 1 ~ Q ~~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ a w 1+~ ~ .m . .~ + ~ N ~ ~ d ` ;_~ s ; t ~~ ,~ i ~ 1 ` _ ~ h -a i W :9 : 7 ~ . - '. ~ - J ~~ ` ~ , F 1 ± .~~ .. -i ... !1, ~A i ;QTY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA PLANNING DMSION ~ ©-~ 67 <: ~i i' I i i I ~.~ ~A i A ,. ` I ' F i i u t, ~t. ,' .. L." ~~ i .Ii.. ~ :..~,I ~' p. 1 Y 1 !~`i~1 `J, w .ry w w .~ ~~...~ ~ --- a ~ -~ i ~-- "~ ~i ~ ~, =,;~ + -~'s_' C r :) .. ~ ~" .. y x:. iF L~ ~ ;i i ~' Ilf } ._. ~" ~ ..... ~. - _y. ~ . `Y: f t 9 i f 11!~ 4' I' ~. .~~ ITEM: S Y OF RANCFip. CUCAMONGA TTi1,E:E[EU~1'r/ay~5 PLANNING DIVISION ~p~ AS ,ate EXHIBIT,(~•~ SCALE: .- ~_ :, - , ~; /.`' _ _,~` i ~~ ~~ - ry ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~!~ ~ r ,~ .., ~ -' ~ _I ~; ~ 3 ~~~ ~ ;,~,~ili~i ils~,~~i1 ~~ ~I~+~~ ,I+ ~i,~f~Il~ i~~{ ~ ~l~lll~il! ~,1~111111 ~~,~~ f ~, ~? ~~ ~~ ~ -~S ,~~'' €'~' '~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ 7 `` ~i i &~~ ~s ~~ ~f = L ^~ I _ d~ ;_... --- i; ~ `~ '~ '~~ .~.. 't!Y OF RANCfiO..~UCAMONGA ITEM: - / PLANNING DMSION TITLE`GQ~CaAc , nu °~C ~ EXHIBIT~D-/ SCALE: z e o ~ °O ~ ~ - ~ r a ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ Y ~3 ~ }:, _ ~ ~ _ ( ~ J i~ ^. '. ~ Q r is f i [6 j ii.~ i ~~ J _ .~-- ~, ~ ~ ~ ; a~ ,~ ~ s a_ ~ s o n o ~', p y ;;, ~ ~ ~;;~ii;zii~l~~i~l111~~1i1i ~ _,, ~ --. ~~~. CITY OF RANCfiO .CUCAMONGA 'rte E:L~Nb~GI~ T~G4l+1 PLA.'VNING DMSION ~D~ RU ~~ EICHIBri': D•i SCALE: <,. <, ~,7., ~~ DEPARTMENT OF ~~rt~>'la ~~'~~~~~~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PRQIECT N: ~/~'yy/S ~~~ ~S APPLICANT: /l//E/Si''~><LI'e~ ~~~on ¢iiiPS // // LOCATION: N ~ M~.()eh ~ ~ Qrul M1YJ~ L~.uJ Ttwse items checked are Corwsbns of Approval APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISpN , (714) aai1961, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDnTONS: A. Time. Llmae t. Approval shall ezpiro, unbs6 extended M IM Plannktq COmmlsaion, N buiblrq permits are rot issued or approved uae Ms not oontmertced withMt 2t rtbrNha IromtM date d approval. 2. DevebpnlenUDesgn Revlew ehaN be approved prbr b / / 3. Approval of TeMalive Tract No. ie aranled subject b tM approval d s. Tha davebpersMNCOmmenca,panbpatN ln, andmnwmmaASOrcauas to be commenced, panicipated in, or wrtsummated, a Malb-ROOe ComnuMry FadNtNS DMrkY (CFD) for tM Rancho Cucamorpa Fire Prdedfon DNtrW to anarlCe OOrMllllgbll anNa maMNerutrMe of a Nro statbn to serve tM daveloprrtent. TM etabn ohMl !» boated, deslprted, and lwiN to aN specRicatbns d tM RalbhD Cucanbrys FNe Prdedbn DWrlc, arld ehaN become tM Districts Ixopany upon oortlpNbn. TM equgmerN ehaN M sebcted by the Dbtriq in accordance wah Ne naetlN. In any buNdlrlp d a etalbn, tM dWabpsr shsU comply wNh all aDWiceble laws and IeplWbns. TM CFD ahaN M bmisd by tM DteVbt arq the Osvebper M tM time reoordtlbn d iM flrul map Doan. J___/- ~~- JJ- ~~- 5. Prbrto recordatbndtM NrW map ortM bauanadbuadklp pemeta, whbhWer comes JJ- lirst,the appicam stall mneenl to, a panblpate M, tM eeUbllsMnenl d a MaNO~ROOs Communay FaciNllsa Dlslrtct for tM aorWn+abn artl r1MIr11Mance d necessary sChdol facilsies. However, N arty sGtool dblrlp Ilan previously eetabNehed such a Community FaclNiBS DlStriLt, tM epDN1'AIa 6t1aN, In IM aNerruaNe, comem b tM aratexalbn 01 IM project sse Imo IM temlory d each exisdrtp Oietrlq prior to tM reoordatbn d tM linel map or 1M ksauarxa d DuNdrp pemWS, whlcMver Domes tlrsl. FuMsr, N IM aNeped ECtgol I District has not loaned a MaNo-Rooa Communiy FacilNies Dietrky wNftb twelve momna Irom tM date of approval of tM props and prior to tM reoordatbn of 1M IInBI map or issuance nl bulkllrq penMS for said propel, this condNbn sMN ba deemed nuN and void. X0`1 gA SC ~ x/91 I of IZ rya-~~Vf~~f/~ ..~ ~.s This Condition shall be waived a the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected scfgol districts have entered into an agreement to privatety accommotlate any and all school irtpacis as a resun of this project. 6 Prbr to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of twildirg pennas when ra map is involved, written cenaicatbn from the attricted water diarist That adequate sewer and water lacilaies are or will be available to serve the proposed project Shall t» submitted to the DepanmeM of Comrrunny DevebpmeM. Such letter roust have been issued by the water dlSlflGl W ilhln g0 days pfloflOlloal map approval inihe CaaBOt SUbdN1510n of pfbf t0135UanCB Or pefRMls m IhB Ga30 OI all ethef IeSideMia projects. B. She IkvebpmeM v~ t V 2 3. // The site shall be devebpetl antl maintainetl in aocardance wah the approved plans whbh incNrde site Ware, arChaequral elevations. exterbr mmeriala arW cobra, landacapirq, sign program, antl gradirq on rile in the Plarverq Divlsbn, dta corMNbre wmained herein, DBVebpmeM Code regulatbrra. end- - - SpecRb-Pbpah6 PJaane66eTrrbmy' ~~ Prbr to any use at the proect Sae or businBSa activity beirq commenced thereon, all Condaiore o1 Approval shall De cortpbted to the satbtactlon q the Cay Planner. Ocarpancyoi the ladlity shah ngcommencaumq srrchtarte aaall Unibrm Buikktp Code ant State Fira Marshall's regulations have bean complbd wNh. Prbr to ocarpancy, puns shall be sul>rttated to the Roosts Cucamonga Rre Prgectbn Dielrlq ant its Buildrtg ant Salary Divisbn b show cortlpNanu. The Wilderg shah W aaDegsd la mrrpliartcs poor to ocarparicy. 4. Revised sae plans and larildirp elevabro inoorporalkq as CondNforro d Approval shah be submated for City Planner review and approval poor p ieauarrce of huNdirtq permits. 5 Allsae, grading, IarMSCape, inpatbn, and shaatitiprovemsnt plats Shah be coordinatetl for wnsisterrcy prbrto iswance q any pemWs (arch as gadNtp, bee removal, erlcroacnmeM, WiWaq , etc.l, or prior to tauU map approval In tM cats q a astom bt arbdNiSion, or approved use has commenced, whbhever cortMa iasl. 6. Approval q My rertuaet shall rot waive COrrIPNande wddt aN teGdlDrro q lM DsvsbpmeM Code, aN other appNcable CNy Ordalancse, and appNCabM Carrarlurtay PIafM a Spealb Plans in eseq at the torte of BuNdrtp PemW beuartcs. 7. A r7etaNed On-aae IlglNlnq pert ehaA W ravievrod and approved try its CNy P4Mtsr and SlMrltt'a Oaparbitsrlt (98g.EE1 t j prbr ro the iasuarta of bulldNtp psrrNb. Such plan shall iMbate aryls, INumautbn, loutlon, ttsgltt and rrtelltod q shieidirtp eo as nq ro adversely aaoct arl(acara propenbe. B. If no ceMraNzetl Vats redelahdes are povldW, ap trots pickup shall ba la InWvidual unaa wah aN recepar;bs ahMlded Irom public view. 9. Trash recepacblsl aro required and shah meal CNy Standude. TM final Welpn, bcatbrts, and Me number q trash racsgagsa shall bs subject to CMy P4rtrtar rwNw ant approval prior to issuance of building permas. to. AN grbund-mounted utilNy apprlnenartdes ouch ea Irenatonners, AC corMermeA, etc., shall be bated out q pudic view and adequately xrosned ihrgph the uas q a combetatbn of concrete or nasonry walla, harming, ardor landscaping ro the salistaabn of the Cay Planner. a o1 ~~ SC ~ Z /91 7 ar 19 J_/_ J_~ ~J_ J_J_ JJ- JJ_ JJ- i J-J_ J-/__ ~J- ~ ~-J_ ~.. , DR ~/r'l1 cny eu,n ]~': 18. 11. Street names shall M submNted for CRy Planner review and approval in accordance with r i Ina adopted Street Namirg Policy prior to approval of the final map. ^ . 12. All buiklirg nUnlbers ar!d IrldIVldUdl UnNS Shrill be identNfed in d Gledr arld t:onCiee manner ' _/~_ incWdirg proper illumination. ~ 13. A detailed plan intlicatirg (rail widths, maximum stripes, physical condeions, tendrg, aM weed comml, in accordance weh CNy Master Trail drawings, shall be wbmiNed for CNy Planner review ark? approval priorto approvaf and reeordationol IM Final Tract Map and prbr to approval of street nrgrovemem and grading pWns. Devebper shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjurlctbn with street improvements. t4 The Covenants, ContlNbru and Reslriclbns jCCBRS)sMllrgt prohibhiM ki)epirg of eQlline animals where zoning reduiremems forlM keeping of saidanimals have been met. Individual bt owners in subdivisbns snail nave tM option of keeping said animals whtqul tM rrecessNy of appealing to boards of tlireaors or homeowners' associations for amandmems to the CC8R5. ts. The Covenams, CondNions, aM RestrkYions (CCBRS) and Artides of Incorporatbn of tM lipmeoWners~ Association are wbject to tM approval of IM Pbnnirg and Engineering Divisbns aM the City ANOrney. TMy sMll M reooroed WnwneraiY vAlh tM Final Map or prior to tM issuance of b(ikirg pemMS, whichever Doers first. A recorded copy sMll be provided to tM Cily Engineer. 15. All parkways, open areae,arld bndxapingsMN he permarteroy meintalned bytM property owner, Mmeowners' association, or other mearro aaxptabb to tM Cpy. Prool of this landscape maimenarbe sMN be wtxttitted br CNy Planner and CNy Ergirwer review and approval INbr to iswance of WNdlrg perlttils. t 7. Solar access easememe sMN M dedicated for tM purpose d aswmirg that each bt or dwelling unit snail Mve tM rfgM to renalva wnNpM across ad~scsm bts or units br use of a solar energy system. The easements may M mraaktad b a Declaration of Restrlabns for tM wbdivisbn which shall ue rowrded mnaarantN wNh the racordatbn of tM Iklal map or ~swartce of permNS, whichever comes first. TM easemeros SnaN prohNtil tM nastklq of shadows by vegetatbn, snudurae, IeAUree or arty omen Objec6 axceq for uliNry wires and similar otyeds, purwam b Devsbpmem Code tiectbn 17.08.g60~(~2. TM pvopct comairm a deagnalsd HistoACal lartdrrurk. The silo st1a11 M devebped and mairnained in aocoroartce wNh tM HildaiC LandrnaAt ANeralbn PanrW No. . Any further rrodNicelbM 10 tM sMe iridudirq, but nq NmNed to, sxtsAor aNerotiorm andior interbr aaeratbrte wnbh affelltM exlerbrdtMbuNdrtgeaatructuroe, rortbvalol landmark trees, demolMbn, rebcalbn, reoorrotrtwtbn of buNONtge a slrudures, or charges to the site, shall requiro a rttodNicalion b do Hbtodc Landrrmrk ANeralbn PemW wbpct b Historic Preservatlort Corrvrkasbn review and approval, J-J- J~- J-J- JJ- J~_ J-l- C. Building Design 1. An atlemative energy system b reQtlirod b provide domestb Mt water for all dwelNng units !, ~-J- an0 for Mating arty swNmnng pool or spa, unbsa dMr aNartiative energy systems are demorlMraled tolxdeQtlivabnl capacity artd ellitaancy. AllawNrtnirg pooh NmlaNad attM time of inNial dsvsbpneM thaN W etipplememed wNlt solar Mating. DetaNe sMN M ubluded in tM buibkq pons and sMll De slNxnNled for CNy Poannsr review and approval prior to IM iswance of buibkg permds. 2. All dwelling6 shaft nave tM IroM, sitls and rear ebvatbns upgraded wAh archilequral .-,. treatment, detailing arW increased delineation of wAace treatmerN subject to CNy Planner review ark? approval prior to tssuarta of buiblrlg permes. SC 1/91 ao(I~~~ ~~ ~.~~,,.k 3. Standard path cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Associatbn shall be submMed for ~ r Cey Planner and Buibirg Ollicial review and approval prior to issuance of buildirg permes. I ~ 4. All cool appurtenances, indWirq air corwebners ant other roof mounted equipment and/or J~- prolegions,shall be shieldetlfrom view arW tM sound buffered Irom adjacent properties ant streets as required by tM PWnnirg Divisbn. Such screening shall ba archNecturally integrated whh the Wibirg desgn and oorlstructed to tM satisfadbn of the Cey Planner. Details shall be induced in building plans. ! D. Parklnp and Vehkuler Acoeae (IM11Cate dNalb 011 buliding plant) _~7. All parkirq bl landscape islaMS sMN nave a mininum outside dimension o18 teat and shall ~~~- contain a 12-inch wak adjacent to the parkep suN (irfcNdirq wrb). 2. TexNred pedestrian patthvays aril textured pavement across droulatbn able! snap be -JJ- provided througrputthe davebprrteM IaaaeeMeeroetbrWY45aS' 3. All parking spaces sMN M Oouob salped per CNy standards arld aN ddveway aisles, JJ- entrances, and axes shall M striped per CNy slarl0aroe. 4. All untie snap M provided weh garage door openero N driveways are les6 than 18 feet b J-J- deplh from back of sidewak. 5. The Covenants, COMNbro and lieahblbrro shah rostrlctMS Storopeof rocrodbMlvshicbs J-J- onthis see unbss they are tM pdncipal source d tronsporlalion for tM owner ant prohbN parking on interior ckalatbn elates otMr than in designated visNOr parkkp aroas. 6. Plans for arty searNy pates shah M aubrtNBaO for tM CMy PlvMef, City EtpNMar, aril JJ- I7ancM Cucamonga Fire ProtBGion Dlntrkl rovbw aril approval prbrb lewanced buildirq pennee. E. LandeGplrrp (101 publky ma1MalMd IarlMCape ant, reNr to Seetlan N J t. Adelailed landscape and Nrigatbn pan, irtcAldkp abp panting and ngrkltgrtN laMSCap• J-J- irq in 1M was o1 residMWl devebpnlen6 shall be prepared by a Nunaed landscape archeea and submlttedbr CNy Poartrter revMwand apprwN prMb tM bwarlwd 6ulldhtq pemtea or prior final map appWal in tM cats of a glftem lot subdNlelort. 2. 6iatirtq lroee reGtrkedbWpreesNW hplau shaNWproleaedwNhaoorrtnrgbn barrier J~- in aooordanpwlMtM MurliGpalCede 5iedbn 19.08.110, and so noledonlM gradingplam. Tns bcatbnal tltoes tress b hs preserved in place ant rfew IocNbro la aarroplMtsO trsea shall be shown mtMde4lNd landscape p4M. TM aPPNCaM 3haMfoeow aN of lM erborbl's remmnferdalbrp reperdkfp proservmbn, transplanting aril Idrm*p methods. i 3. AmMimumol_trssapergroseacro,cdmpdaedollMloeowingslzea,sMNbeprovidad J~- wehintMprojed: X-4a-irbn hoz or larger, %-3&iftcftboz or larger, X - 24-inert box or larger, _ X - 15-gaeon, and _ X • 5 gaNon. ~ 4. A minimum of ~__X o1 trey planted willen 1M project ahaN W apecNMn a@a Vees - J~- 24•inch hex a larger. ~5 Wehi ki b I . n par ng ts, trsea atoll be pentad at a rate d one 75yalbn tree br awry three -J~'- parking stalM, auHiCieM to shads 50X of IM parkirtq arse al molar noon on August 2t. ~, SC ~ Y/91 ! of 11 ~ O~ `~~ 1/ 6. ~7. e. - ~ V~, rr7 ~/~ iree55hall be Flametl inarea5 of public caeca adjaoem to and among SiNCtureS eta rate of cne ~~`- !ree Der 301inear teat of bwldirg. --- Allprrvale slope banks 5teet Orle55 in verticalMghlaM of 5:l Orgreatersbpe, Gutless than J_/_ 2^ sbpe, shall De, at minimum, irrigatetl and landscaped wRh appropriate ground cover for erosan wnlrol. Sbpe Dlamirg requeetl by mis secibn shall include a permanent imgatan system to be installed Dy the devebper prior to ocwpanq. All private sbpes in excess o151eet, but less than a teat in vertical MpM and o12a or greater ' slope shallbe landscaped and inigated lorerosbn controlantl to 5oheniheir appearance as tolbwr one 15yalbn or larger s¢e Iree per each 150 s4. h. of 5bpe area. t galbn or lager sae shrub pereach 100 sq.tt. of sbpe area, and appropriate ground cover. in addition, slope banks m excess of a teat in vertical MN7M and of 2:1 or greater sbpe SMII also include one 'i 5-galbn or larger s¢e tree per each 250 5q. h. of sbpe area. Trees antl shnbs shall M planted in staggered cbsters to sopen and vary sbpe plane. Sbpa plaMirq requiretl by this section shall include a pennaneM imigatbn system to M instatted by iM devebper prior to ' occupancy. 9. For single lartety resdential tlevebpmeM, all sbpa pWMinp and irr{patipn sMY be cominu- ousy maimamed in a Matthy antl Ihrivinq condition by the rlevabper until each individual untt is sold andocCUpied bytM buyer. Priorto robasirtp occrtpartq for ihoseunite, an inspection snail ba conducted by tM PlanMng Division to rtetemYne that iMy aro b satislactory coraYbn. / 10. For mutt4tamily residential and ron-residential devebprtieM, property owrtaro are respon- sible for tM continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-silo, as weN as corniguous planted areas wtthin the public rpMOl-way, All IaMSCaped areas ahaM be kept tree Irom weeds and debris and rrteirttaktetl in a hsaMM and 7MWtrq mrMitbn, and shall receive regular prunirp, rertilixinq. mowirq, arW iMarkrq. Arty damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying pWm material snail be replaced wNMn 30 days Irom iM date d damage. 1 t Front yard larascapinq sMll bB required per iM Osvebprtlsro Gods and /or . This requirorMM sMY Its in additon to tM required street trees and sbpe plaMirq. J~~ J-/_ -/J~ J-/~ _J-/- _.~_~-. -/-/-- -/-/_ t 2. The IiMI despn of tM perimeter parkways, wags, landscaping, and eYfewaxcs shall M included kt tM required lertdecape pone and ettaM W tlrrWeet to CYy Planner review ant approval ardcoordptated brcortsiatarwy wNh ary parkway Illndecapirq plan whkh mayM requned by tM Engirteerptg Division. t 3. Special lartdseape IeaWrse such as rtqundNtq, aNUVial rode, epsdmen alze tress, meander- ing sidewaW (witty hodirNaal nJwrtpal, era MaeroYNd WrdscapYq. M requkad abrp / t a LandsrapYq end IrAgalbn eyetarne raq.rired b bs inslalNO wYhln tM puONC riptMCl-way on IM perknalsr d Ihis Drofsd aroa snap be mrapuwely IRapltalrlad oY tM devebper. t 5 All walls sMN be provided wNh dsmratM troelmeM. p lbcatad In pr7DYC malroenance areas. tM desgn shah a ooordlnated wYh tM ErtgYtaerirlg Dlvlebn. t 6. Tree malMenartpe crNarla sheN tM devebped and er7bltNtlW br CYy PWtrlar review and approval prbr b eauarice of OuYtlktg permits. TheN crNana shall encourage Me natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. hIC~ t 7 LaMSCapirtq ant irrigalbn shall be designed to conserve water IhtCxtgh tM pnncples of %enscape as tlehnetl In Chager 19,16 0l the Panda Cucamonga Municpal Code '~~ J-/~ -~ --- aL~1 d~ u' . Y/91 aof IZ _~~£st -f s F. SIQ/na/ V 1 ThBSgnS lfltliUted OntmB SUDmRtetlplana are GOnbeptUdlonly and rl0tapdr Ot !hlsdpproval ~.__ Any Signs proposetl for This devebpment shall compry with the Sgn Ordinance and mall regmre separate application aM approval by the Pianrnng Divlsro n prar to mstauatan of any sgns. 2. AUn3orm Sqn Programtor this tlevebpmern shall be submitted for Ciry Planner review and _l_._i_ approval poor to issuance or buiding permAS. 3 Diregory monumertl sgn(s) shall bB provided for apartment, contlominmm. or fownhome5 J~r, prar t0 occupancy and Shall reQlrire Separate application and approval by the Plannlrg GMsion prior to issuance or iwildirg permAs. G. Environmental 1, Thedevebpershall provide each prospective twyer wreten rotke of the FOUM Street ROdc ~, ,/J_ Crvsharproject in astandard format as deterTrined by iha Ciry Planner, priorto acceptirga cash deposit on any property. 2. The devebper shall provide each pro5peciNe buyer wreten notice of the Ciry Adopted Special Studies Zone tort the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, poor to acoaplirg a cash depose on arty property. 3. The devebper shall provide each pfpapBGTrve buyer wreten notice of the Foothill Freeway proleq in a standard lortnat as determined q' IM CNy PWnner, prbr to aceegirtg a cash depose on arty property. J__1___. ~/J- 4 A linal acoustical report shall be SuDmeled for Cily PWnner review and approval prar fo the I rseuarlCe of building permits. The final report aheN disas6 IhB level of interbr noise ' anenuationtobebw45CNEl,theWibirtgmateAaleand oansirugbntechnpuesprovided, j and a appropriate, verity the adepuaq of the mdlgalbn measures. The buibirq plans will be I cheUced for ooMormance weh the mtpation rtteawrea coraaeied et the final report. i I N. Other AgencNs _/_l_ f. Emergertry secondaryaoceaa stulfbeprovided in accordancewNn Rancho CUCarnonga Fire ; -~r--~- ProlBCtbn District Standards. 2. Ernargencyaaesashalltx povided, rttaettertance hee andcbar,aminlrtumo1281eetwlde -JJ_ at all times dunrq consbuctbn in aocordartu wdh Rancho Cucamorpa Fire Protection District repuiremertts. 3 Prior to heuance of buildYq pertnts for combtrstide oonelnrgbn, evidence shall be ~ ~._,~_ submeled to ifb RarrJq Glarttonge Flre Prolegbn Dbifbt thel temporary water suppry for Lire protagbn ro avaNaDb, peMNtg compbtbn of repufred fire proteabn system. a, The applbanl shah comas iM U. S, Postal SaMCa b determnee the appropnale type and ~' J _J- lodatbn of mad boxes. MuNFlamily resideneal OevebpmerNe shell provide a soNd overhead ' stnrcture tort mad Dozes weh arkpuate NghtMq. The MW bcatbn d the mail Mzee arW the '. daspn of tM overhead xrtfcture ahaM be strbjeq la CNy Plenrtsr review and approval prar to the issuance of aribirq pertnNe. 5 For pro)ects using srrpic tarot IacilAbs, written cerekafbn of aoceplabilky, including all supportive rMOrmatbn, shah De oDtarred from HtB San BemaMirro Couray Depanmern or Emlronmemal Health and submAted to the Bulldirtg Ollkwl prior to Ins iaaUdrlce of Sepuc Tank PermAS. and prar to Issuance of buddirtq permta. Sf, .2J9` sort ll ~~~ i7 Y' =-~R £~-i5 APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT 7HE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1883, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. She De bpment The applicant shall corrgly wehthe latest adopted UnNOrm BUibing Code, Uneortn Mecnanr ~ J-J- cal Code, UnilOfm PlumDirg Code, Natbnal Electric Code, arxl all other applicable miles, ortlinances, and regulations in effect at tM lime of issuance of relative penn8s. Please I wrnaa the Buibing and Salery DNisbn Tor copies of tM Cotle Adoption Ordinance antl ~'~, applbable hangouts. ' 2. Prior to issuance of building pemYls for a now residential dwellirq unit(s) or mapr adtlNion ~ -J--/- loezistirqun4ls), the applicam shallpay devebprrenttees allM estadished rate. Such lees may ex;lude, but are rot IimNed to'. City BeautAicatbn Fee. Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems ~~ / Devebpmern Fee, Pertne arM Plan Chodcirq Fees, arW School Fees, i ___~L_~ 3. Prior to issuance of dribinq pennNS for a new commercial or irtdustdal devebpmenl or ~i JJ- atldhbn to an existing devebpmern, IM appNcarn shah pay devebpmem fees at the estadished rate. Such lees may include, but are not IirtWed ro: Syslerte Devebprnent Fee, i / Drainage Fee. Sctztol Fees, Permit and PWn Chedtirq Fees. V 4, Street addresses shall be providedbytMBUibirgOllidal,aMertracUparcelmaprecordatbn IJ~- and prior :o ieSUante a buikirg permits. J. Eslsting Structurq t. Provide mnplfance wNh tM Unsorm Buildkq Code for the property Ifne cbarances i J~J- mnsitlenrq use, area, and lire-reaietNeM95 a ezpiirrp Wibyrgs. i 2. Existirq W ibirgs shah be mace to oorrgly wiM correct buNdkp and Zoning regulations Ior J-/- the imerzled Use or tM bnbirlg shah Ds demolished. 3. Existing sewage tlisposal ladWies shah De removed. iNled and/or capped to comply with the I J___I_ Uniform Plurtbirp Code and UnNOrm &lildirtp Code. a. UMerglound orrsNe IAINIiee are to De boated and shown on OuI10Nlp plena suGnMed for I J_J_ WilOktp pemMt appNCatbn. I K. GradlDg // i Grading a tM ttub~ect property shell M b acooNencs weh dta Urebrm Buildrq Code, City Gradfrtg SlaMarde, artd accepted grodirq prectkaa. TM ikNl gradktp plan sMll De m wbetanNal oorrlorrrrtrKa wah tM approved gradkq plan. 2. A soib report e11aN bs prepaed q' a qualified engNtear Ncerleed DY IM State a CalMOmia to pertorm such wok. / 3. The cfevebpmenl is boated wllhin tM soM sroaion cvMrd 6ourMarba: a SoN Dkturbance / S ~-/- ~J~ -~-I- PemMle requited. Please COrtladt San BerrlardklO COUnIy Oapartrtwnlol AgrlwNuro at(711) 387-2111br permitappNcatbn.DocumerNatbnofsUGfipemWehaNbawbnattadtotMCNy prior ro IM issuance a rough gradktp pam1N. i A geological report shah be prepared W a qualeb0 erglrteer or geobglel and atdKnined at I -/_'__ iM hrM of applicalbn for gratlirlg plan check. 1Telinalgradirtq pWns shallMCOmpietetlaM approvedpMrto lseuance of dnldirq permits ~ --- .. -., ZOO Q L SC 2/91 7 a 19 - -; ~~E~i-lS zs- s. As a wstombt subdivisbn, the fallowing requirements shall he met. a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement ezacuted guaranteeing corryletbn of allon-sAe --~-~- drainage IacilRies necessary for dewatedng all parcels to the sahsiagion of the Bmbing ~, and Safety Divisbn priorto linal map approval arW priorto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conduced omo ~I J-J- or aver adjacem parcels, are to be delineated and remrdetl to the satislagbn of the Bulldirg aM Safety Division prior to issuance of grading aM building permits. a On-site drainage improvemems, necessary for dewatenng and protecting the subdvided ~I -J_.J- properties, are to be installed poor to issuance of lwildirq parmNs for mnstruabn upon '~, any parcel that may be subject to drainage lbws ersenrg, leaving, or wehin a parcel , relative to which a building peons rs requested, I d. Final grading plans for each parcel are !o be submitted to the &ribing and salary ~ ~-J- DivisionloratNxovalpriortoissuanceof Wilding and gradktg pemits. (This may be on an ~, incrememal or mrrposile Dasis.) ' e. All sbpe banks in e><rasa o15 teat M vertical heiphl shah De seeded wph native grasses J_I_. or planted wish gnwnd rover for erosbn mmrol upon mmpetbn a pradkg or some other apemative method a erosion mMnol snap be mmplated ro tlro satislaabn of the Building Oflbial. In adtlNbn a pem,anem irrgatbn system chap Ce provided, This requvamem Goes not release the applicanUdevebper from compNarfce with the sbpe planting requiremerns of section 17.08.010 I of the Devebpnnerp Code. APPLICANT SMALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISpN, (711) a8o-1862, FOR COIpDLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CDNDRN7N3: L. DWkatlon end VMkuler Acpu ~ 1. RgMsof-way and easemema shaA W dedicated b the City fa aA aderbr oudtc streets, i -J_,r_ community tmile, public pasaoe, public 18/Wecapa areas, street Imes, and publb drainage tacilpies as shown on the plena artd/w Ismrlva map. Prlvra aasemerNa for rqn-publk j facilpies (cros&bt drainage, brat feeder trails, etc.) chap be reserved as shown on the plans anNOr tentatNe map. 2. Dedication shall l» ntatla d Ste fONOVrirtg dgMsal•way on dte perMrteter streets J~_ Imeawred from etreat amarAna): tart«1on II tau feat on tar feet on I tar feet on ~'I 3. An irrevocable overol deaidatronfor -foot wlde roadway easement asap be made ! -/_,~._ for all private streets or ddvss. ', a, Non-vehicular atxass shop be dedicated to fM Csy la Me lolbwirtg streets: __ _, __ __ _ s. Recprocal access easements shall be provided ertsudlg amass to all parcels by CCSRs or W deeds aM snaN be recronied mrtarterpty wAh the map or pMr to the bsuartce of ~ ~ _~ Wddirtg pemtss, where ro map ro inwNed. v. 'rB1 eerla~D 1 Q!~ ~. DR bpi-)s o. Private tlrainageeasementsbrcross-lol drainageshallbe provided and shauoe de!~nealed -- or rated onthe final .map. - - - 7 The final map shell clearly delineate a t 0-root minimum bwlding resirictbn area on the _ - neighbonng lot adpiNng Ih¢ zero lot line wall and comain the following language: ', "w/e hereby ded~e'ate ro me City o7 Fancno Cucamonga the right fo prohibit .he ccnsrmdbn o/ (res.Henriaq buildings (or other 56vdures) wdnin those areas desgnared j on the map as bwNirg restnrtbn areas." A maintenance agreement Shall x150 be granted iron sate btto the adjacent bt lhrougnthe ~~, CCBR'S. 8. All eaislirq eaSemeM5lyirq wAhinfNUre rgMSVI-way Shell De RuacLTimed or delineated on ~i ~r-/- the linal mep. 9. Easements for puMb sitlewaACS andror street trees pWCed outside the public rgM-ol-way '~, J-/_ shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroacn omo private property. t 0. Addabnal street rigMOf-way shall be dedicated along rqM tam lanes, to provde a minimum JJ_ of 7leet measured item the face of verbs. M curb adjacent sidewak is used abrq the right tam lane, a parallel street tree maimenance easement shaa be provided. ti. Thedevebpersfrall make agocdfaaheaonroacguketha requkad oa-sae property ktterests _1_J_ necessary to construct me required public InplpvettMrea, ant X he/she s7bukt faa to do so, tfw devebper shall, at least 120 days prbr ro submittal of tits tiny map for approval, enter ~ into an agreemem to complete Itte improvemeras purauam b Govemmem Cade Sedbn 66462 al such time asthe City doqukesthepropeny kserosb reWMedforlheimgovemems. II Sucn agreemem shall provide br paymels DY the devebper of as o0ata kcvmed by the Cay to acquirethe oft-saelxoperty imereats requiredinconnectionwah the aubdlvision.Security for a portion of these costs shall ba in the tone of a Caen depoaa in the arroum given in an appraisal report obtained by the devebper, at developers ooA. The appaiser shah have been approved by the Cay prior to commartcsment d dte appraisal. j M. Steel Improvemems 1. All pudic inprovemema (imsrbr streets, draarege faeilNka. Wrttrrearay tYiNe, paaeos, I ,_/,/_ IarWscaped arose, etc,) shown on the genie and/or tentative map shah be mrotluaed to I Cay standards. Imerbr attest improvemeraa afwa kttWde, bta are not artWed lo, orb an0 li palter, AC pavement, dn~ ve apProashee, sidewaks, sheet Yplaa, artd aired tees. 2. A mirwrtum d 2& loo wfda pavemere, walwt a w •lod wide dadbated dgM~of-way Shall be ~ J-J_ wnsTruded for all haM•sealon Neeta. 3. Corrsinra the loaowilq pehfldN sired inprpvenlenb Mtcarding, but not artatetl to: I _/~_ A 51REEr ryAME CURB a a VI'IER C. PV~TY atDE WMJ( ORNE AI'PR 977iEEy tIORIB ~ 71RJJ! CObi. TRAIL trgD Ie1.1ND o71tER sc.srsl soda .20-~ g-G -.,, Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping ant imgation on meter. (6) Pavement reconsiruabn and overlays wAl be determmed during plan Check. (q if so marked, s~de- watlc Shall be arvilinear per STD 304. (d) If so maMed, an m-lieu of constmction lee Shall be provided ror This item. / 4, Irtprovement plans and constmctbn: a, Street improvemem plans inoWding street trees ant sheet IigMs, prepared try a regis- J~- Iered Civil Ergineer, shall he wbmmetl to and approved by the City Ergineer. Security ~ shall oe posted and an agreement executed to itro satislapbn of iM City Engineer and 'I the CNy Anomey guaranteeirrg completion of the pudic and/or private street improve- '~ mama. prior to final map approval or the issuance o16uiMirq pennAS, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to arty work beirq pedonned in public rlgMOl-way, fees shag w paid and a J-J- construction permx shall be obtained from the CNy Ertpinsera Ollfre in addhbn to any other pemsts requred. c. Pavement sidpirg, marking, trallb, street name sipnirrp, and kxerconnect condos J-/- shaN oe installed to the satisfagbn of ma City ErtgAUSr. d. SignalcortdUeweh pu110ozee shahwirntaaedonarry new[oratntctionorrxortatructbn J~_ of major, Secondary a collector streets which iraarsect wah other me)or, secondary or colbdor streets la future traffic signals. PuN boxes Shah bs pieced on both sides of tM street at 31eet ansiw of BCR, ECR orarryomsrbctlbM approved bytM Clry Engineer. Notes: J~- (t)All pull Doxes shall be No. 6 unless dnerwlse epecabd by iM Cary Engineer. (2) ConduA shah be 3-inch galvanized steel wah puNropa. e. Wheel chair ramps shah be kutaped on aN burcorrwra d kasrselxloru per City JJ- Standards or as directed by the CNy Enpnear. I f. Exiatirtg CNY roads requbrq dOfmiNCtlon aMN remain open b tradb et ant tMnes with JJ- adeWatedetoursdurirpcarotmdbn. AstreN doaurs partrW mayW required. Acash ~, deposit st1aA w provided to Dover tln COs! of gradrp and paving, whkh shah w reluMed upon corttpletbn of tM camnr<Ibn to dr salWadbn d tlta CNy ErtpNwer. g. ConcentrateddrUnagafbsvashahnaawesidawaks. Undereidewakdrairm shall fb i J-/- iretaNW to CNy SurtlLrds, sxlYpl for aYtple lamily b1s. ~ h. Nandbap alxset ramp design shah Ds as spaaNad try the CNy Ertpkrar. i JJ- i. Sheet rterttaa stW Wapprovetl bytM City Flamer prbrto subnANalla Mtplan check. J_:- 5. Street irrprovamerN Pbrre px CNy Standards for aN private streets Mall Os provided for I JJ- reviewand approval M tM CNy Ertgktser. Pna to arty work bsktg pMomtW on ma pri- vate streets, fees shah ba paid and cortetrtxAbn psmtMa shah W obWrtad from the Cary Engineers Ohba vt addllbn to arty omen parmas rsqukW. ', I 6. Sheet tress, a rttksrtum d 15yalbn sea a larger, shall W IntdaYed par CNy Standards in I, J-~- accordance wAh the City's stre61 tree program. ~, SC~4/91 10 of 11 ~D ~ O~ meer for conlormsnce azn ns snail be reviewetl b the Cny Er L Ir#ersecibn line of sae des ... D~b9-~,i ~~~~. y g g adopted policy . -.-- a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sgrn shall b¢ potted .or all proles irn¢rsenions, -- - including driveways. Walls. sgns, and snpes shall be bcatetl outszie the lines of sght. Landsdapirg and Diner obstmawns within the lines of sight shall be approved by Ne Cdy Engineer. b. Local residernial street irnerseAbns shall havB their rolbeabilXY improved, usually by _/„_ l_ momng ine2•h cb5est s1B8111ees on each sidB away tromthe street and placed ins street // Vee easement `! 8. A Pe tt shall De obtained from GAL7RANS for any work wdhin the folbwing rgMObway -J-J- ~t~d~,.~nn< ~y+~~L i __ 9. AX public IRIprOV¢nrems do m¢ IolbWing StfBBls shall bB Operetionaly COrripletB prior to the ~ --~-/- Issuance of building permis: N. PuD/lli llYlnfeMnp Area I V _ 1. A separate set of Wndscape and irtgation pWns per Engineering Pubib Works Standards i JJ_ shall be womined to the CXy Erpineer for review and approval prbr to final rtap approval or issuance of building parmes, whichever occurs first. The folbwirg landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easemems, traib, or other areas are required to Ge annexed IMo the Landscape MaimenarlCe D'atpq hlcwen AJe~ue Meol;a., ,/ I V 2. Asgned cronsern and waiverlonn to pin anNOrlorrn the appropriate landscape anO Ligming ~, _J.-J_ Districts shallbe filed wdh the City Erpineer Drbrto ltnalmep approvalor issuance of buibirg ~, permits whichever OCn11rs Iirsl. FomWtion Costa stall b8 bOfrle t]y the deYebpef. ~J. All reouired public laridscapinq and irdgatbnayatems ehellba cominbusly maintained bythe ~ -/-J_ / devebper umil accepted try the City. l/ a. Parkway IaMscapirq on the lolbainp street(s) shaX oonforrn to Me rewMS of the respegive ~~, -J-1- Heautilidation Mantel Plan: uaJe-r~ ~1Je ~.wl~ i - - O. Drelnepe arM Food Comrol t. The project (W pprNone tlNreol) is bated wXhin a Food Huard Zone: merelore, Ibod -~-'- protedtbn meaaurse enaX W provided ae ceAXled by a regbtered Civil Ertglneer and approved by the CNy ErtgXlear. 2.. It shah be the devebpefa responeibXXy to have Ute arrorX FIRM Zone ' J___: __ despnation removed Irom tM project area. The devabpefa efplMer sfudl prepare atl ' necessary reports. daM, aril hydrologY/hydrauXC calalaXOrro. A CorWXbnal Letter of Map Revision ICLOMR) shah be obtained from FEMA prior b 1kW map approval or issuance o1 Duiklkq permits, whicMver Dears Net. A Letlar o7 Map Rsv'iabn (CONK) shah be issued Dy FEMA prior to oxupancy or irrgrovemem acceptance, whicMver occurs first 3 A final drainage study shall be submXted to and approved q' the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of fwibirq pennts, whiGttever occurs first. All drainage tadilitie5 shall be installed as required by the CRy Engineer. D, sc ~ ve l u cite ~_~~~"y~ 4. A pertnh Irom the County Fbotl Comrol District is requred for work wsnin As rght-of-way, 5. Trees are prohibited wshin 5 feet or the outside diameter of any public Storm tlrair, pipe measured Irom the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6. Public storm drain easemerns Shall be graded to convey oveAlows in the event or a bbdcage in a Sump Wtch basin on the public Street. P. UtII11/I05 / t. Prowtle separate utility servbes to each parcel including san8ary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (all urgegroundj in aoooroance wsh me Utility Standards. Easemams shall be providetl as required, 22 The tlevebper snall be responsible for the rebcatbn of eaisiing utilNies as necessary. 3. Watef and Sewer pWns shall be deSgned and constructed to meet the requlfemems of the Cucamonga Coumy blazer District (CCWDj, Ranch Cucamonga Fire Protoctbn District, and the Environmernal Heakh DepaAmern of the Coursy o1 San Bemardira. A boar of ICI compliance Irom the CC WD is required prior to linal map approval or iswance of pennNS, whbhewf Occurs Iirst. O. General Rsqulramenb and Approvals t.The separate parcels comained wshin the project bourMarfes shay be kgallycomdned irno one parcel Ixior tc Iswance of huibing permits. 2. An easemern for a joim use driveway shad be provided prbr b Ikral map approval or iswance of buibing pemits, whichever occurs Iirst, tor. 3.Pnor to approval of the final map a depoaN 91WN be posted wilt the City covering the estimated cost of apponbning the assesameraa under Aaaesarnent DistAct among trio newly seated parcels. a. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional MalnWy, Secondary Regional, and heater Plan Drainage Fees anaN a gab prbr to Iktal map approval a prbr to Duikirg parmp issuance N no map is inwNed. 5. Permits shag a OOlakted hom the bNOwing agendse br work wddllfl task rlpMO1•way: 6. A sgned CWMMI alld VraIVa1 form to bIn ardor form the Law Enlwcemsm Corrlmrney FatllNise DMtriq shah W flNd with tM CNy Engnear prbr to final map approval or IM Tswana d busdrg pertNb, whichever pears fleet. Fomialion opals shah De borate oy the Devektpar. 7 Prior to finallzatbn of arty devebpntenl phase, suHkierN irrgrovsmerN pWte snu be corn pleletl beyond tM phase boundarb5 to aswfe seCOrldafy aocass and dralnpa IMMeCt10n 10 the salisladbn of tM CNy Ertpineer. Phase bourtdarbs shah correspond b bt Nrtea shown on the apgoved tenWNa map. J- - _/_l_ J-I- -1-/- J~_ J_/_ JJ_ J~_ J_l_ J___/_ JJ_ J__J- J_J 2 01 ~ ~--, SC ~ Y/91 11 of 19 RESOLUTION N0. °(I- 35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING TWO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FCR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-15 FOR TNO RETAIL DUILDINGS TOTALING 14,800 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE HAVEN VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AND HIGHLAND AVENUES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COM4E RCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-271-65 AND 71 A. Recitals. (i) Diversified Properties has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 89-15 as described Tn the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On June 26, 1991, the Planning Comm scion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed publ lc hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said hearing adopted their Resolution No. 91-78 thereby approving the application. (iii) The applicant filed a timely appeal of the approval represented in said Resolution No. 91-79 on the basis of the requirement that existing overhead utilities be undergrounded on the Cal trans right-of-way adjacent to Lhe project site. (iv1 On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the appeal of the application and, on said date concluded the publ lc hearing. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by Lhe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that ali of the facts set forth in the Reci tai s, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and concurs with the issuance of the Negative Declaration issued on June 26. 1991. a01 ~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. DR 89-15 - DIVERSIFIED November 20, 1991 Page 2 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced November 20, 1991, hearing, including Written staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced June 26, 1991, Planning Commission meeting, public testimony, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-?8, this council specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property iota ted at the northeast corner of Haven and Highland Avenues with a street frontage of 830 feet and lot depth of 445 feet and is presently improved with a 91,191 square foot shopping center; (b) The property to the north of the subject site is single family homes, the property to the south of that site Ts vacant, the property to the east is apartments, and the property to the west is partially vacant with existing condominiums; (c) The application contemplates the development of two retail buildings totalling 14,$00 square feet wl thin the Haven Village Shopping Center; (d) The requirements of Planning Commission Resolution No. 91- 76, remain to be important and necessary to the development of the property, except for the following modifications: (1) Engineering Condition number 4 shall be revised to allow payment of a fee in-lieu of undergrounding utilities across the freeway right-of-way on Haven Avenue; and (2) Engineering Condition number 5 shall be revised to allow the developer to bond for the future undergrounding of Highland Avenue utilities within the freeway right-of-way instead of baying an in-17eu fee. (e) The development as specified will not contradict the goals or objectives of the General Plan or Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and would not promote a detrimental condition to the persons or properties in the immediate vicinity of Lhe subject site. 4. based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon Lhe specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and conciudes as follows: (a) The application is consistent with the General Plan, and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; (b) The design or improvements of the application is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; (c) The subject sfte is physically suitable far the type of development proposed; ao~ ('~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. OR 89-15 - 7IVE RSIFIED November 20, 1991 Page 3 (d) The design of the proposed development is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or avoidable injury to humans or wildlife or their habitat; (e) The development is not likely to cause serious health problems; (f) The design of the development will not conflict with any easement acquired by Lhe public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed development; and 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject to all of the conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-78 (a copy of which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "1") except far the following modifications: (a) Engineering Division Condition Number 4 shall be revised to read as follows: "An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (tel ec onmunica tion and electrical) on the project side of Haven Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City's adopted unit amount times the length from the center of the Route 30 Freeway right-of-way to the northernmost pole north of Highland Avenue (200t feet)." (b) Engineering Division Condition number 5 shall be revised to read as follows: "The developer shall enter Into an agreement and provide a security for one-half the cost of the future undergrounding of the existing overhead ut111 ties (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of Highland Avenue, based on the length iron the center of Haven Avenue to the east project boundary, until such time as it can be determined that Cal trans will underground those lines at their own expense with the construction of the Route 30 Freeway, 6. This Counc 7l hereby provides notice to Diversified Shopping Centers that the time within which jud?c ial review of the decision represented by the Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California ;;ode of Civ11 Procedure Section 1054.6. UJI CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. OR 89-15 - DIVERSIFIED November 20, 1991 Page 4 7. The City Clerk fs hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Diversified Shopping Centers at their addresses as per City Records. ~)6~ ~~G E 311I BIT "1" RESOLUTION N0. '~.-'- A EESOL'u TION OF :'HE PLANNICiG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CAL IFOANIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Yo. 89-15 FOR TWO RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 14,800 SQUARE 'r EET WITHIN THE HAVEN VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTH-c AST CORNER OF HAVEN ANO HIGHLAND A'/E NL`ES IN THE NESGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-271-65 AND 71 A. Recitals. (i) Diversified Propert iee hoe filed an application foz the approval of Develoe c,e r,t Review No. 89-IS ae described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Reao lutio n, the subject DeveLOpment Review requese is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the of 26th aE June 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and conclutlea said meeting on that tlate. (iii.) All legal prerequ ieit ea prior to the adoption of this Reeolut ion nave occurre a. e. Resolution. NOW, Tl1EREFORE, it ie hereby found, determined, and reaolvetl by the Planning Comm iasion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ae follows: 1. This comet iasion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of th ie Reeolut ion are true and correct. 2. Based upon subetant ial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, thin Comm iasion hereby specifically fintle as follows: (a~ Tha application appl iee to property located at the no rt heaet corner of Haven and Highland Avenues with a serest frontage of 830 feet and lot depth of 445 feet and ie presently improved with a 91,:91 square foot shopping center; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site ie single family homes, the property to the south of that site ie vacant, the property eo the east is spa rt mente, and the property to she west ie pert Tally vacant with ex•st :nq condominiums; and ~c) Tha proposed Detailed Site Plan and Elevations comply with the Master Plan and architectural theme eatabl is hed for this center. 3. eased upon the aubetantial evidence presentetl to this Comm iss un du r. ng she above-referenced meet inq antl upon the spec if is findrnga of foots set forth rn paragra phe 1 and 2 above, thin Commission hereby finds and mnc.udee as follows: PLANNING COMN I95ION AESOL'uTION NO. '.~ DR 99-19 - DIVERSIFIED PROPERTIES Suns 26, 1991 Page 2 (a) That the proposed project is coneiatent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the propoaed uee is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the diet rict in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed uee is in compliance with each of the applicable prow ieicns of the Development Cotle; and ~d) That the propoaed uee, together with xhe conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to propert tee oz improvements in the vicinity. A. This Commission hereby finds antl certifies that Lhe projoct has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California @nvironmental Quality Act of 1970 antl, further, thin Comm Lion hereby 19euee a Negative Declaration. 5. Rased upon the findings antl conclu alone set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 6 above, Chie Commie eion hereby approve. the applitat ion subjeot to each and every condition set turth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated hereln by this reference. Planninq.Div ie ion 1) All future signs shall conform to the uniform sign program ae eetabliehed in the Naven V1l la qe Shopping Canter. The uniform sign program for Che ex Leting center shall be amended to inclutle Phase III improvement e, and shall be consistent with the e9tabliehed sign program for the center. 2) The site shall be developed end maintained in accordance with the approved Site Plane (which includes arch it eetural elevations, extsrioz materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on £ile with iha Planning Div ieion, the rood i[ione contained herein, and Dwelopment Code regulations. 3) Graffiti shall be removetl within seventy-two hours. A) The entire Bite shall be kept free of trash end debris at all times, and in no event shell C rash antl debris remain for mote than twenty-tour how re. PLANNING COMHI55ION RESOLUTION NO. ,i -, OA 89-15 - OIV£RSZFZEO PROPERTIES June 2fi, 1991 Page 3 5) There shall be provisions for the fo ll.owing deelgn features in the trash enc loaure to the eat isf action of the City Planner: a) Architecturally integrated into the design of the shopping center. b) separate petleetrian access that does not raga ire opening the main doors to include self-closing pedestrian door. c) Large enough to acoommodat¢ two Crash bins. d) Ro11-up doors. e) Trash bins with counterweighted lids. f) Arcnitecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g) chain link screen on top to ptevent trash from blowing ouL of enclosure antl tleeigned tc be hidden from view. 6) Trash collection shall occur batw•en the hours of 9:00 a. m• and 10:00 p.m. only. All op¢rat ions and bueln•eees shell be Conducted to comply wish the following standards, which shall Da Lncorporated info the lease agreement of all Lenante: a) Noise levels. All cortmrrc Lal actlvlt ies shall not crests any noi•• ihat would exceed en exterior roles level of 60 dBA durlnq the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and 65 dBA during the hours of 7:00 e.m. to 10:00 p.m. b) Loading [he Un'_oadin9. No parson shall cause the loading, unloadingr opening, c loe inq, or Diner handling of 6axes, c rate e, container, build Lng materials, garbage cane, or similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., unless otherwise specified h•rsln, In a manner which would cause • noise d let urbancs Co a ru ident lel area, ?LAiiN ZfiG COMNi55:0.`! A350LC:t0° ti0. .- - OP. 89-15 - DZ'JERS 1eiED PR CPERT:'c5 June 2b, 1991 Page 4 c) Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed Lnto bu ildlrg faces and shall not extend out into the petleetr ion wal kwaye. The design details shall be reviewed antl approvetl by the City Plannez. Encinee[i nq Oivie ion: 1) Construct the Haven Avenue metlian south of the southerly driveway no further than Highland Avenue. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the coeC of construction from future development on the we at side of Haven Avenue. In the event that construction of this portion of the median becomes a City project, the developer shall participate in fond ing one-half Cha project conc. 2) complete street improvements on the east aide of Haven Avenue from the project's south boundary to Highland Avenue, Lnclutllnq curbs, gutter, street lights, Ac pavement, and curb-ad}scent sidewalk. 3) Reconstruct the aoutherly drive apprea<h on Haven Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A) The existing overhead utilitie6 (telecommunications and electrical) on the project aide of Haven Avenue shall he undergroundad from the ex iet ing terminus south of the southerly driveway to the Eiret pole south of the ca It rane right-of-way for the Route 30 Freeway prior to public Lmprovament acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the CSty•e adopted coat for undergrounding from future development (retleve lopmene) ae it occurs on the opposite aide of eha street and south of Route 30. Services crossing Naven Avenue shall be placed underground at the same time ae the main line. Zf the developer Can obtain, prior to the iaeu once of building permit e, ae eurance trom Ca ltrane that the utilities will be untlergrou nded by and at Ca it rane' axpenw upon construction of the freeway, this roquirement will be waived. PLANING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ..-'~ OR 89-16 - DIVERSIFIED PROPERTIES June 26, 1991 Page 5 5) An in-lieu Fee ae contribution to the future untlerground ing of the existing overhead utilities (teLecomnunicat ion and electrlcel) on the project aide of Highland Avenue shell be paid to the City prior to the iaeuan~e of building perm it •. The fee shall be one-half the City's adopted unit amount times tM length from the center of Haven Avenue to the es et project boundary. 6. The Sacratary to this Commies ion shall certify to the adoption of ehie Reeolut ion. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TN DAY OF 1VNE 1991. PLANNING CONK ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIIMONGA BY: ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Sacratary of the Planning Commieelon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do NreDy certify tMt the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pnesed, and adopted Dy the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission heltl on the 26th day of June 1991, by the Eol lowing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCF'ER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: VALLETTE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CRITIEA X777 ~~ DEPARTMENT OF ~,~~~~~ ~>,~~ma~l~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PRQ1ECT e: U R v! r ~~ SUBJECT: !i/'IGSC. /!L i APPLICANT: 7/~I~CfSr~><.'e'!~ ~,~/'On BiilCS ff,~. '' II /~ /I LOCATION: N C~ MQ,UCrh KUP.~ Qr~.l M~YiLi LGncJ __. Those items checked are CoMe'arls of Approval APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION , (714) pNa-1e61, FOfI COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDRION3: A. T1maLlmbe t, Approval shall expire, unbss extended by IM Plannlrq Commission, s Duildtrp pemtila are rat issued or appoved use has not conrnsnced within 21 momma from the dale of approval. 2. DevebpmBm/Desgn ReWew sMN be approved Prbr b r r 3. Approval of TematNe Tract No. b pranled wh)ed to IM approval of _/_/- ~J- -J-1- ThadevebparshaNCOmrtbnp,penblpals in, andmneurtrrwle orcauae to be commenced, ~~- particpated in, or corounuttatad, a Melbgooe CortsturNty FadlNbs Dlbtrbt ICED) for the Rancfa Cucamorpa Fire Protegbn Obtrld to flnana COMtNdbrl anNor rnawgenance of a lire statbn to ssne tM devebfxronl. The statbn eMll W bated, designed, and built to all specsicalbrts d tM Bartels Cucartartga Eke Protsdbn OlstrbL arld shah become tM DistricYa property upon oorfpletbn. TM squgnenl ahaA M sabaed W the District in I~ accordance wish Ns roew. In any WYdlrp d a etetbn, IM dwsbper shall comply with all appcabb lawn and repula[bns. Tlb CFD aMN be brrrtetl by tM Ohtrld arxl the devebper ~~ try tM tune reuvPoWbn b tM final map occurs. ~ Prbr to recordatbn d tM flrW map or tM bsuanu d bulbkp pemsts, whlchsver comes ~~ _; - IirSt, the appicam shah WMel11 to, or t>ortblpale 'e6 tM eelabNShrrbnl of a Melb•ROOs Community FacilMbs Obtrbt for tM oorrtmdbn artd rrWntenartcs d rteussary scfaol facilities. However, A any SGlaol dt6trld has prsvbusly 18tsDNShed such a Camrnunity FadlNies District, IM appNcarN shah, in tM aesrnalNe, wroent b tM annexatbn of Ne project site imo tM territory of such sxi6linp Dblrbt prior to IM recordalbn of tM final map or 1M issuance of drildirp permas, whbttever comes Ilrsl. FurtMr, N tM afladed sctacl district has not tornbd a Melb Roos CommunNy FaciGlb6 Dielrict wshb twelve momhs Irom tM dale of approval of tM propel and prior to tM reCOroatbn of tM Ilnal map or issuance of buildup pemrls for Sad propel, Ihb conditan sMN bs deemed rtuN and vod. St: 2/91 1 of 11 This wndeion shall be waivetl 8 ins CAy receives notice lnai the applicant antl all attegetl SeMOI distnas have emend into an agreemem to pnvatery accommodate any aM all school impacts as a resus of this protect. Prbr to recortlation of the linal map or prbr to issuance of budtlirg permits when no map is ', _/,/_ Imoived, written cettifioatbn Irom the aarlcted water dislnct that adequate sewerantl water tacdeies are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the '~ Depanmem of Communey Devebpmem. SUCK iener must have been issued by the water ' distract within 9o days prarto final mapapproval inthe case of subdivisbn orprbrto issuance of pemuts m Ine case of all other resdemial projects. B. Site Devebpmem t. The sfle shall 6e devebped and maintained in aocardance wah the approved plans which ~', J_J- include site plans, archaectural elevatbns, exterior materials and wbrs, landscaping, sign i program, and grading on file in the Planning Divisbn, the carbabns comainetl herein, '~, Devebpmem Code regulatbns, end- ~i __ c . QJaaaed-Eernrrlnlrilye ~I V 2. Prior to any use of the project see or business activity being commenced thereon, all _J~_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satcslaabn of iM Cay Planner. 9. Occupancyolthe ladleyshall riot commence umil5uchlirne a, aliUnilonn Building COdeaM .,_/_./_, Slate Fim Marshall's regulatbrl5 have been complied wah. Ptbrto OCCtlparloy, plans shall be Submitted to the Rancho Cuwmorga Fire Protection Oietria arb tns BuaWrg artl Salety Division to show corrs7liance. The buibirq MeM ba inepsuYeO for oonpliance prbr to occupancy. w/ a. gevised see plans and diibirg elevatbns incorpdrataiG aN Condllbra d Approval shall be ! _/_/_, submetlW for City Planner review arW approval prbr b issuance of building parrots, j 5. Aasea. grading, landscape, mgatbn,aMatrealimprovamsM pane shad be ooonlinated for ~ -J-~- consistenoyprbrtoiswanuolanypemms(each as gradtnq,tree removal, encroachmern, buibirg , etc.). or prior to linal map approval in Ihs case rN a custom bl subdivision, or , approved use has commerMed, whichever wares brat. 6. Appoval of this request snail not waive wmpNance with all IWalblla of IM Devebpmem Code, an other applicabb CNy Ordkrancsa, and appacabN CommuMty Plans a Spacilic PWrrs in effect al the tiros of BuillHrrp Permit iaauarree. 7. A detased on~atta IFplrtarg plan shah t>s reviewed and approved q' iM CXy Planner and Snerel's DepMRMM (9B9-t3at t) prbr to the issuanq of Wildflp pemYta. Such plan shall Indicate style, ipuminalbn, bcalion, hegm, and melfroO d ahblding so ru not to arNersely aflea arlMesrrl propertbe. 8. tt ro cernrallzed trash reuptadea are provided, aplraah pickupahall be for irldvbual unas wan all rereotactes shwfdad Imm ourJh vrw ~/-J~ J_J_ ~~- V 9 Trash receptach(s) ars requNed and shah mast City etandetw. The NrW design, bratbns, _ J_J_ and ma number of trash rscegacba shall be aubjea to CMy Planner nvfew and approval poor to issuance of Golding peones. t 0 All ground~mourned utility appurtenances such as hansformers, AC wnderrsers, etc„ shall ~ - J__ _'.___ oe boated out of public view and adequatary Screened through the ass 01 a combination of wncrete or masonry walls, banning, and/or landscaprnq to Ine Shcislaabn of Ine CAy Planner x ~ Z/al Z of 19 n. Sfreet names shall be submitted for CNy Planner review and approval m accordance with _ ~_ the adopted Street Namlrg Polby prpr to approval of the final map. 12 All buibirg nUmberS orb ifblVldUdl Unrts Shall b0 benidied In d Gledf dfb ConCisa maMer ~, _/_J~ Inclutlirg proper illuminatbn. ' t3 A tlelalled plan indicating trail widths, maxinum sbpes, physical corbNions, lendng, and I J~- weed control, m accordance wnh City Master Trail drawings, shall 6e submihed for CNy PlannerrewewarbapProval priortoapprovalantl reoordalionol the Final Traci Map orb prior i to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Devebper shall upgrade and consirud j all iratls, including lensing and drainage devices, in conpnctbn wxh street improvements. ' I ib The Covenants, COrbabns arq Restridbns lCC8RSl shall rotprohibitthe keelNrq of eouine ~ _J.~'- animalswherezoningreQUiremeMSlorthekeelNngol said animals have beer, met.lndividual ~, bt owners in subdivisbns shall have the cplion of keeping said animals wNhoW the rwcessity 'I of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amentlmeMS to the ~. CCBRS. t 5. The Covenants, GondMbns. orb Restrictions (CCdRs) and Asides of Inoorporatbn of the J_J- Homeowners' Associatbn era sutijed to the approval of the Planning and Erginedrirg Divisions and the City ANOmey. They shall be remrdrb corlcumeMly with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of 6uigirg pemtNS, whichever ocars lirst. A recorded copy shall be provided to the Ciry Engineer. ta.Allparkways.openareas,aMlantlscapirgahaNbspennaneMtymeireainedbythspoperry J-/, owner, homeowners' association, or other nlBarq aoceptabb t0 the City. Pro01 0l this landscape maintenance shah Da subrtwNed for Ciry Planner arq CNy Engineer review orb approval prior to issuance of buibing permits. I! t ~ Solar access easements shall De dedgated fa the purpose of assuming that each bt or ~ J-J._ tlwellirlq unit shall have me fIQM to rBCeNe sunllpM acro56 adjacarn bib or unAS br use of a solar energy system, The easements may be coMaNbd b a DecWntion of Resirkxbns for i Ise subdivisbn whgh Shall be recorded cOncunsMly wiNrthe recordatbn of the finalrtWpor j Issuance of permes, whicllevar comes last. The easements shah prohgil the casting of ; shadows by vegelatbn, sm,etures, faturee or arty other obpd, except for uliNly wires and similar objeds, pursuant ro Dsvebprtrent Coos Seaton t7.08.06o-G-2, 18. The Prolea contaiM a dsspnated Historical landmark. Ths silo shall 6e devebpe0 and ~ - J_J- maiMained in MOOroaflCe WNh tM Histodc Landmark ANeratbn PemNt No. . Any turtMr modNicalbne to the sNe inchWirg, but not Nmeed to, exlsrbrakeratbna arbor intergralleradoMwNtichaMedtMebeliorolthebuiblrgeorstnlaures,removaloflarbmark Irees,demolNbn, rsbcatbn, recorotnfdbnol huildaip5 or strudures. or charges to the sse, I~, Shall reQuirs a modAicatbrl !D the Hislolic landmeM ANeratbn ParnYl subect to Historic ', Preservatbn CAnarkSSbn fWlew altd appoval. C. Bulloing Design 1. An asemative energy system b requireo to provide dorrle811C hot water for all dwelNng unss '', J---'- and for heating any SwNnrrtirg pool a ape, unbss dhsr aNemative energy systems are i demonstrated to be of eWivaknt capacity ant efliciericy. All swimming pools inetaMsd at the '. time M instil davebpnMnl ehaM tM wppbmemed weh solar hsWNq. Detaea Shall be ~'~, included in the buibirg plane and shall he wdnMed for CNy Planner review and approval poor to the issuance of Wilding permes. 2 All dwellings snail have iM Iront. sloe and rear ebvatgns upgfedeo wen arcNlectural Irealment, detailing and increased oehneatgn of surface IreatrMm subject to CNy Planner review and approval poor 10 issuance 01 building pennNS. Sl: 7/91 ] of 14 ,-~ 3. Standard patio cover plans for use Dy the Homeowners' Associatbn shall be submntetl for _ I_ Cay Planner and Building Olfkial review and approval lxbrto issuance of lwiltlirg peones. ~4 All rcol appurtenances, inducting air contlabners and other rcpt mourned equipment and/or ~i J_J- projeabns, shall be shiekletltromwew andlhe sountl buNeredlrom adjacempropenies and I~ streets as required by tM Planning Divisbn. Such Screening shall M archNedurally 'I imegrated wtth the building desgn and mnstnnctetl tc the satisfaaion of fhe Cay Planner. ~ Details shall De inducted in buiding Wars. ; 0. Perking and VMkupr Access (Indiate detalq on OulWinp pWns) III ~1, All parking bt Wrdscape islands shall nave aminirrum outside dimension of 61ee1 and shall I _J,_J- comain a 12-inch wak adjacem to tM parking sWN (inckrtlinq wnb1. I I 2. Tezturetl pedestrian pathways and textured pavemars across circulatbn stales shah M i -J--!- provkled througfqul tM devebpntem 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City stardarde and aN driveway aisles, J~- erNrances, art axes shall be strgetl per City slardarde. a. All unas Shall M provided with garage door opertero a driveways are tree than i8leet in J___/- depth from back of sidewanr. 5. Tke Covenams. Conditbns and ResMCtbneaMNrssidQMeatoragadrsaeatbnalvenkbs --~--~- on thbsae unbssthey are lM pincpal source d traneponatbn f« the owner and prohiba parking on interior ciraWtbn states «Mr man in r7esgnatad vapor psrkkg arose. 6. Plans for arty sewray gales sMN M submNted for tM Cay Planner, Clly Engineer, and J-J_ Ranctw Cuwmorga Fire Protegbn Dlatrbt review and apgovalpbrb Issuance of buidirg pertnas. E. IJndsdplnp (IOr puDllely frlNntalrred YndaCape Hap, nNrto 9rC't10n NJ 1. Adetailed lafdsdape and Nripation Want, irchldNtq sbpa paralrgand rtgdel horns Wrdecay J-I-_ irg in 1M case d rasideMWl WvebpMle, shq be prepHW W a NcMSSd IaMStapa archaea and subnNlledbr CM partner review andapprwrl pMrto tM INWanw othuidirg pemtas or prior lino map approval in tM case of a aatom bl suodhrlebn. 2. Existin~tros6lequkWtoWproesrvrdbplarwsMNWprt.+tectedwahaoMlNnk.Ybnbarter J~- in aooordarcewNhlM AaurNClpflCode Sedfort /9.08.110, and t0 n«edontM yadrgplaln, rnebcatlonolmoaetresarobeproservedinplace and new locatlonsf«trarteWantetltrees sna0 be mown «tlMdeWhd Wn0.NCapa plats. the appNCarN ahaNloNOw aNollhs arborist's I recommertdalbrts regardNg prosarvatbn, hansp4rainp and Idmmkg rMtltods. I 3. AminMtumal,treee pergrose aGa,comprNe0o1tMI0NOwlnq aizet,shaN Ae Provided it --/_/- wahintMprojep: X-48•inch box «IrryH, X-36 fricflbox or larger, j ,_, X - 21• into box or larger, _ X - 15yaNOn, and _ X • 5 gaNon. ~4 A minimum of ~r/,_X of tree! plumed wNhin the ProNsd shah be specNrtsn size uses - ~I -l„-. 24-iflCt box or Wryer. v .5. VlAhin parting bts, trees shall De plamsd at a rate d one 15yallon trM for every tones '', __ _ _ _ parklflq stalk, suflkiem to shade 50Ya of tM parking area n edlrr moon On August 21. sc ~ vsl ~ one V /6. / j e. ~~3_ _8">'/~ Trees shall be plaMetl in areasof public view adlaceM to antl abng structures atarate of one ~~ it ~ ~~ tree per 30 linear lest of Wibirlg. -- All private sbpe banks 5 teat or less in vertical hagnl and o15~,1 orgreater sbpe, but less than 2:1 sbpe, shall be, at minimum, irrigated all landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosbn Control, Sbpe palling required by ihi9 section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the tlevebper prior to occupanry. Ail pivate sbpes in excess or S lest brit lessihan a feet in vertical hepM and of 2:1 orgreater sbpa snail be IantlscapBO and irrigatetl for erosion control and to sonen their appearance as lolbws: one 75yalbn or larger size tree per each 150 sq. a. of sbpe area, 1 yalbn or larger sae shrub per each 100 sa. n. of sbpe area, and approprate groundCOVer. In atldNion, sbpe banks m excess of a feet in vertical hepM and 012:1 or greater sbpe shall also include one 5-galbn or larger size tree per each 250 sq. h. of sbpe area. Trees all shrubs shall he plamed in staggered clusters to soaen and vary sbpe plane. Sbpa pWntktp required by this secton shall include a partnanent inigalbn system b be hstaNed W the tlevebper prior to occupancy. 9. For singb (amity reaitlential devebpment, all sbpe plareirp and IMpatbn ahaN be coMinu- ousty maintainetl in a heaphyand Innvirq mrdttion W 1M developeruntA each individual unN is sold and occupied Dy tM buyer. Prbr to robaaklg OOglpancyforthoee unXa, an insperdbn shah be conducted by IM Planning Divlsbn to drNSrtntne toot they aro in aalialactory wndNbn. / 10. For muei-lamity residential and ron•roaiaeMial develppnant, property owatsro are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of ap IarrdscaPetl areas on-ails, as weX as contiguous pWMetl areas wNnin Me pudic rpMCl-way. AX landscaped arson shall a keg tree Irom werda and debris and maintahed in a MaNlry and IMlvkrg opnditbn, and lhWl receive regular pruning, fanAtzirtp, mowing, all tWerNnO. Arty dalttaped, dead, tlbaased, or decayirtq pWM material shah bs replaced wXhh 30 tlays from the date d damage. 17. Front yard lardscapklp shall f>e required per tfM Devebpment Code and /or . 7hia requinmeM ehaY be h addilbn to tfta raquked street traea and sbps panting. 72. The final tlespn of tM penrttMer parkways, walls, 4Mecaping, ofd sidewalks shall be included h tM reQlrired IarrdeCap pWM all ahaM W atrgeU to CNy P4rwter review and approval andcooroWlsd brcanintency wXharty parkway IardacaPkrg pianwAtbh may be required Dy the Ertpirreerktg Division. t3. Special landscape fsaturee~uch as moundktg, aMlvutrock, epecMnenalga treaa,meander- irq sidewaW (with ttorizonlal durpel, all kNeroMMO IanGCaplrq. Y rapreed abng / 14, LandscapMtp and lMpalbn eysterro rspuiredbbe irMalNdwMhtfr pWNC rgltfcl-way on the perknaler d tMe poled area shah bs oorakaausy maeealnW W tM dwebpar. t 5, All walls sltaN bs provided wah dscoratWS troatnlent. M bcale0 h pubes maintenance arena, tM tlaagn shah W oportlhalW with IfM F-ngNrMrp DNkbn. t s Tree maimenana crNerla aftaN ha OavebpW and wdteged br CNy Planner review and approval prior q ssuanu d buildktp pemtea. These dlteM eMll enoourape tM natural growth charadenstica of ma aelsded tree apeciee. !~ _ t 7 Lair Os~capirq arM knpatbn shall De desgneO b oonaerve water tnragh the prtncipbe of XenSCape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of dM Raridto Cucalrorga Municpal Cade. J~- J-J- _/-/. JJ J_l- J-J- J-J- J-/ _ J-~- J-J - I -/_- - SC ~ ]/9i SOf 14 :. I_~. ~81-I -- .. ,.~ F. 61gn/a V 7 ThesignsiMicatedonthe subminetl plansaremnceptualonly antl rotapanof this approval --- Any 5gn5 proposetl for this devebpment shall compy won me Sgn Ordinance and shall requre separate application antl approval by the Planning Divison prarto installatbn of any 5gn5. 2 AUndorm Sgn Programforthis tlevebpmem snail Ee submittetl for Ciry Planner review and -~-/- approval poor to issuance of buibirg peones. __ 3, Directory monumem sgnls) shall be provitled for apanmern, condominium, or towntames J-/- prior to occupancy and shall require separate application aM approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1, The devebper shall provide each prospective buyer written rotice of the Fourth Slreel Rodc ' J~_ Crusher project in a standard format as determrted by the City Planner, prior tc accaptirg a cash depose on arty property. , 2. The devabper shall provide each prospective buyer written notice o1 the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red HiN Faun, b a standard fomtat as detenninetl by the City PWnner, prior to acceginq a cash depose on am/ property. 3. Tna devabper shall provitle earn proapedive Duyer wrMen notice of tM Foothill Freeway Proleq in a starttlaro format as determined by the CNy Planner, prbr to aaegirtq a cash deposit on arty property. 4 A final acoustical report snail De submitted for Cny Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of buibing permits. Tea final report shah dlecvss the level of imerior raise amenuatbnto Debw 45CNEL.iM Wibarq matadale antl construabntechnpues provitled. and n aplxopnale, verity the atlaquary of iM mngalbn meaauroa. TM buibirtq plans will be crxrcked for conformance vriltt the mnpation measures comabed in iM final report. J~- J_I_ J_J- H. Olhar ApancNS ~, t, Emerparrcy sewndaryaooesa ahaNbeprovbed NtaGddrdandeweh RanchoCUCartanga Fire ~ -~-y- Protegbn DistrxR Standards. ~, 2. Emergeray accesssnellbe provided, ntakssnarcslrse and cbar,a mirtllrumof 261eetwbelJ-/- al all times dunrq cortatrtiurtbn in aocordana wile Ranch Ctrcamorga Fire ProteuYbn ~~ Distrit requirements. 3, Prior to beuartce of huildkq permits for corrtbuetiDN aorrolnactbn, evidence Shan De ~r~~- submeted to the Rarctto CuCenanpa Flro Protepbn Dletrbt IMI terttporary water soppy for lire pmtarxbm M evaNaDN, psrldkp mntloletbn of raquked Ilro protec(bn system. 4. Toe appllCare afuA contact the U. S. Foetal Service b delertnNte the appopnats type an0 J _; bcatbn of maN boxes. MUNflamily rnaidanlial OevebgMflle shall provide a soNd overhead ' strudture for maN boxes with adequate NpMkp. TM INtal bealbn of the mall boxae and the ~, desgn of tM overhead slNClure shah a subjeq to CNy Ptertner review and approval prar to IM issuance of buibinp permne. 5. Fof projects uairtf) sepliC tank IaClktle5, WfMen ceflNicatbn 01 aoceplabiley, including all supportive rtNOrtnatbn, snaN W odained Irom dw San BemaMNto county Depanmern of Errvironmernal HeaNh antl wbmsted to the Sulldirtg Ollbial poor to tIb issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prbr to issuance of buibirlq perMS. SC ' 2/91 a or 11 ~._.~R _~_+-Is -~~- APPLICANTS SMALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 9119-7861, FOR COMP~.IANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. SNe De bpmenl The applicarrt shallcorgNy wAh melatest adopted Undortn 8uibing Code, Undorm Mechem- ~~, J-;- cal Code, Undorm Plumbmp Code, Nalbnal Elegnc Cotle, and all othef applicable codes, '' ordinances, and regulations in enea at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please comact the Bmlding antl Salary Div~sbn for copses of the Cotle Adoptbn Ordinance and '~ applicable Handouts ~3. V Poor to issuance of building pemdts for a new resitlemial dwellirp unN(s) or mapr atld4bn to existing unA(s), the applicant shall paydevebpmem lees allM e5labllstled rate. Such tees may inclUtle. Dut are rot limitetl to: City Beaul4icatbn Foe, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Devabpmenl Fee, Perms and PWn Checking Fees, arq ScMOI Fees. Prior to issuance of buibing permts for a new commercial or irtdustdal devebpmetA or atltlnion t0 an existirp tlevebpmenl. the applicant shall pay devebprarnl 1695 at the estadishetl rate. Such leas may inclutle, M are rqt IirtlNed to: Systems Devebprnent Fee, Drainage Fee. School Fees, PermA anC Plan Checking Fees. J-/- -J_~- 4. SVeel addresses shall De provided by the Buildup ONicial, alter lracuparcel map recordatbn and poor to issuance o. WhWirg permAS. J. Ezlstinq Sirtxtura 1 Provide compliance wAh the Undorm Buibing Coda for Ise property Ilse clearances consieennq use, area, and fire-resistiveness of exotinq Wildktgs. JJ _ J-l _ 2 Existing buildups mall be made to mrnply wdh coned buadirp and zoning regulatbns for ~ J-~- the Imertdetl use or the buildup shall be demolished. 'i 3, Existirp sewage Disposal tadlNies shall be removed, IAled antl/or Capped to comply with the ~-./___/- UnBOrm Plumtbinq Cade and Unisons &liltletg Code. ~, a Underground ors-site utilNias are to be boated and sluwn on huildkp plans submihad for i J-J_ bril0ing pertnil appecalbn. K. Gradlrla l// _1 Grading o11ne euDled propsAy Snell ha in accordance wNh tM UrJbrrn Buildrp Code, CAY i -~---~-- Gradinq Standards, and accepted gradirp pradbea. 7ha fktel gratlkp plan shall be in i, Substantial oordormarta wMh the approved 7adMtg plan. ' 2 A soils report snaN be prepared by a qualiliad engineer NCerteBd try the State of CalNomia to --~---~- penorm such work., 3. Tl1e devebpnterrt b boasted w4hin the sod eroabn corMrol bourtdarfes; a S08 Dleturbance ._/-/__ PermA a re0ulred. Please oonlauY San Bamart7lno Count' DaparttiNnl of AgrlcuNuro at 1714) 387-21 t11or perrNtapplication. Ddwmeraatbn of such pMmN enaN be submNted tothe Cdy poor b the isauartce of rough grading psrmil. _ 4 A geobgbal capon shall !» prepared by a QualNbd erpineer or peobglet and submdted at -~-~ - ~. the tIR19 OI applicatbn Io/ gredlfg plan Ctleclt. ' ~_5 fiefinal grading plans snallbe completed and approved prbrto issuartceolbuildirq permAS -- .-. sc 751 voila 6. As a custombt subdivisbn, the Iollowing requirements shall oe meP a. Surety shall be posted arq an agreement executed guarameeing completion of all on-srte ------ drainage lacilitiesnecessary for dewatenrg all parcels to the sabsfadbn of the Bwklirg and Salary Division pnora final map approval and prar to the issuance of gratling permits, ' p. Agpropnate easemens for sate disposal of drainage water that are conduged onto ~ J_J- or over atljacem parcels, are to be delineated and recortled t0 (he Sati51a4nbn of the '~ Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and twibing permits. c On-sne drainage improvemems, necessary for dewatenng ant protecting the subdivided ~ -J--~- propenies, are to be installed prior to issuance of twibirg permAS for construction upon ' any parcel That may be subject to drainage lbws emenrg, leaving, or w8hin a parcel relative 1o which a building pernh is requested. ' d. Final grading plans for earn parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety -J-~- Oivisbn torapproval prior to issuance of twibinq arW grading penrhs. (This may be on ar. '~,~ increrllernal or mnpostte oasis.) e. All sbpe banks in excess of S le4t in vertical hepM shall fee seeded wNn native grasses or blamed with ground covertor erosbn comol upon completion of grading or sumo omen aaematrve method of erosion control snail ba completed to the salislagion of the Building Olikial. In adddbn a permanent imgal'an system shah be larovfded. This requiremem does rat release the applicanbdevebper 1mm compliance with the sbpe plamirg requiremerns of Sectbn 17.08.040 I of the Devebpmrem Code. _/_J- APPLICANT SNALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNISION, QA4)gei1e62,FOR COMPLIANCE ', WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDRION3: L. DWkatlon end VMfwler Acdie ~' i Rgms-0I-way and easements shah pe dedicated to the City for aN imerbr pu61k streets, '~ community trails, publk 1laseos, pubec IeMecaPe areas, street trees, arW publk drainage ~,, facilities as SMwn on the plans and/or tematNa map. Private Ba5am10m5 for non-puNk facANies (cross•bl drainage, bcalleeder ttails, e1c.) shah be reserved as shown on the plans ~, and/or tentatNe map. 2. Dedicatbn shall Ce made d the foeawirq rfpMsol-waY on dte perktteter streets I~ (measured from street umsrfinal~ I idol hat on tdm feet on teal lest om total feel om J-J-- J_J~ 3 An lrrevoraWe oiler of detlicetbn tOr -loot wide roadway easemem shah be made', -~-:'_.__ for all private streets or dmvee. _ _ 4. Non-vehicuWr access shah 00 Dedicated to the CNy for ttte lolbwing sireetb: .- .-. --- _ 5 Recipocal access easemens shall be provideA ertwntg access to all parcels by CC8R5 or by deeds arW snail be rebomfed oorlcurran8y wAh the map or pMr to the issuance of WlWittg pem7AS, where ro map q Inwlved. '~ ]r'11 eon is D3~-is 6 Private Drainage easementslor cross~bt Drainage shall be provaetl and shallde tlehneateC -`~- or noted on the final map. --- --- .7 The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum bwbirg reslratan area on the _,-_ neighboring lot atlpining the zero lot line wall arW comain the folbwinq language. -UWa hereby dedicate fo the Crty of Ranc/a Cucamonga me right fo p/ohrbit the ~~ conshuabn pl (residentiap buildings (or oMer stmctures/ within tlase areas tlesrgnated on the map as WJtlirg restriction areas." ~i Amaintenance agreemem shall also be granted from each bt to the atljacern bf through the ~'~, CCBR's. B. Allexisting easemerns tyingwahinluture rigMSOI-way stWllbe quacWimedor delineated on '~,~-i-;- the linal map. 9. Easemerns for public sidewascs and/or street trees pWCed outside the pudic rgMof-way '~, J_/- shall be dedicated to the City wherever ~ney encroach omo private propeAy. ~~ t 0. AddNbnal street rqM-0l-way shall be dedicated abng rpht tum lanes, to povide a mininwm J_J_ of 7 feet measured Irom the face of curbs. N arb adlacerN sidewek is used abrq the ngM tum lane, a parallel street tree maimenance easemem shall be provMed. 11.Thedevebpershall makeagootlfaahedonto aoqulre tta requred oil-sae property imerests J~_ nBGebsary t0 m11s1Na Nle fegllllBd puaic IIIgroVBRleflla, and N he/SIM! atgYb loll t0 do 90, the devebper snail, at least 120 days prior to wdnlltal a the final map ror approval, erner imo an agreement to complete Ine irtgrovemems pursuam b Govemmam Code Sectbn 66462 al suchtirne astMCiry aequkesttle property inletests squired brine irtprovemeMS. Such agr9emem shall provide br paymerN b1' tM devebper of ap meb Nbumed by the CNy 'i to acquire the oN-sse IxopeM irNarests required in mrmeaion wNh the wbdlvision. Security ,; for a portion of these costa shall be in the lorm a a cash depoeN in Ine amour! given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, rt dsvelopeYa mat. The appraiser shah have ~, been approved by the city prior to commencement a the appraisal. M. Strati tmprovememe 1. All pudic irrprpvemems (imsdor streets, draNwpa IaciNlies, mrfvflunay trail6, pe6eos, _/_/_ landscaped areas, ac.) Brown on the plena andror tentative map snaN W mrMruaed to '. city Standards. Imerbr street im{NOVBmerNa ahaN irlchcde, but are cot NrrNted to, arD and ~' gutter, AC pavamem, Wive approaches, sidewaW, street NpINs, and street trees. i, 2. A mirNnum a 2& loo wide pavemerN, wNtwn a 4g -too wfde dedkatad dpM"ot-way shall be ~' J_j_ mnstruasd for all haN-eegbn ablate. ~, 3. Construe dN loeowirq psrknetar street ImprovsmerNS kbNrding, but rot Nm11eC to: J J_ S'IFiELT NAME CURB a CVffER AC. PVMC amE WA{J( DRNE APPR 97RELT WFfW Jfi~[ 77iCL1 CO~BA. 77iNL ~ L11/iND OIHER ~%al Bof l7 Notes: (a1 Median island irlClutles landscapeg and rogation on meter ibl Pavement reCOn5lNLign and ovenay5 will be detennlned dunrg plan check. (c) It m marked, 5qe- walk snail be arvilinear per STD 30a, (d) If so marked an in-lieu of wnsimcYlon lee shall be provided for this item, / a Improvement plans and consirudbn: mss'. ~ ~ U~ ~'/~ a. Street improvemern plans including street trees arq street IpMs, prepared by a regis- ~ ~~- tered Civil Engineer, shall be submeted to and approved by the CNy Engineer. Security Shall bB posted and an apreemern executed to tfM aaIIS1aC110n of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guararneeing completion o1 me pubic andror private street improve- merns, priorto final map approval or the issuance of buigirq pennNs, vrhkhever occurs i first. b. Prbr to any vrork being penomred in pubic rlpMOl-way, leas st1aN fb paid and a consinrdan permit shall be obtained Irom the CNy Engineers ONbe in addM'an to any other permits rewired. c. Pavement Striping, marking, intact street name signtrg, arW interconnect mrfUrN shall be installed ro the satisfaction of Me City Engineer. d. SgnalcoMlNwehpullbozes shall be sgtalledonarry newoonatnxbonor recorotrucibn of major. secondary orcollactor streets which intersect with other rtupr, secondary or collector streets for future traffic sgnab. PuN twzaa shah be paced on both sides of the sireetat 3leel outside ofBCR, ECRor arryolnerbcatbm approved Dythe Ciry Engineer. Notes: (i) All pull bOZea shall be No. 6 unhse gtlelwi69 aPedNled by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall ix 3-inch galvanized steel with puNnaps, a. Wh691 chair ramps shah W Irgtalled on aA tour corrNre d IntarsadbM per Ciry Standards or as directed by the Ciry Erginnsr. f. Exerting Gey roads requiring oorrninzdbn ahaN rsrnein open b iraflb ra aN tknas wish j adequate dolours anrg a>rretnletlon. AeVaetcbwre permN mayW required. Acasn deposN snaN W provided to cover Me coat m graa^0 arM paving, wMcn ehaM be ~, relented upon rbrtpletbn of ifM corwnrglon to iM aeeWaabn d dre Cpy Engkneer. g. Concentrated drainage lbws ahaN not r;rMesidewaNU. UMxaWewak drains shag Da irutaNed ro CMy Shrdenfe, except br ekgb larttey Ms. n. Handigp eases ranp daepn aluN be ae apecdied Dy the CNy Engkzear. ~. Street rterfres ahaN a approved try the Ciry P4nMr ixbrto stlGttatal for first plan ctzrdc. 5. Street improvement Dlarro par CNy SlandaNt la aN prhrale strsNa shah be provided for review and approval W 1M CNy Engineer. Prbr to arty work bekg peAOmted on Ms pri- vate streets, fees atulll De peb and rxxrotruGbn pertrtae e1Wl be obWrud Irom the CNy Engineers Ollie n addNbn to arty otMr pemWe rsqulnd. V 6 Street trees, a mkanum of t5yalbn sae or larger, shah be Malatled per CNy Standards in accomanca wsh the Cdy's street tree program, J_ J_ JJ_ J_J- J-/- -/_J_ ___/-/__ -/_/- J~- J-J- J_J_ ~- ~_ N: 3/91 IO of l7 _.. U1~.&9-iS Intersect an line of site desgn5 snarl be reviewed by the Ctly Eyineer :or ccnbrn'~ance wrn ~~'J'r""~ adoDtetl policy. a On colleQOr or larger streets. lines of sgm shall be plotted for all project mtersectlons. -- - inclutlirg oriveways. Walls, sgns. and sbpes snail be boated outside the Imes of sght. LaMSCaping anC Otner obstmarons whhin the lines of sight Shall be approved by the Cay Engineer. b, Local resitlemial 51re9t intar5egron5 shall hav0 their notioeabilAy improved, usealfy by ~~, _;_/- movingtne2+.~-cbsest streettreesoneach side awaylromlhes;reef and placed inastreel '~. tree easement. ' ~a Ape A shall be obtained from cALTRANS for any work wtthin the following ngM-of~way ~ J.-/- _ ~~(an~ Q~i r_r1LL_ 9. Ail public improvemems on the folbwing streets shall be operationally wmplete poor to the ,. -/-~- issuance of building permits: ~~. N. Pub/ll/e MBIndMnp ArMt V 1. A separate set of landscape and ;rogation plans per Ergineenrq Public Works Standards snarl be submitted Io the City Engineer for review and approval prbr to final map approval or issuance of huildirg permits, whichever occurs first. The lolbwirq Wrxiscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, IrailS, or other areas are required to he annexed into the Landscape Maintenance Oist~~II'q '^ t~ ~_l_ 2. Asgned consem and waiver form to pin and/orlorm the appropriate Landscape arW Lighting ~, ~~_ Districts shall be tiletlwith the Ctty Engineer pdortolinal map approvalor issuance of Dulldirq '~, permits whichever occurs first. Fortnalion vests shall be home by the devebper. ~~, ~3. All required public landscapnG and imgatbnsyatems shall De oontinuousty mainlainetl hythe I' ~1~- / devebper umil accepted by the Ctty. Y 4 Parkway landscaping on tM lolbwirp street(s) shall rnreorm to Me resuMS of the raspepive ~' _J-J_ 8eauteication Master Plan: ' Na/ar, ~Jen..L 0. Dnlnage and Flood Control t. The Droleot (or portbns IfMreef) is butted v+ilhin a Fbod Hazard Zone; therefore, fbod - - - protection measures ahaa be provided ae candled by a registered Civil Erglneer and approved by die C8y Ergirwar. 2 II shall be the tlevebpefs resporoibiltty to have tM artertt FIRM Zone 1 _ ___ tleslgnatbn removed from tM project area. The tlevebpeYe engkNer shall prepare all necessary reports, parro, and hydrobgiNhydrauec tabulatbrro. A CondMbnal Leiter of Map Revlsan (CLOMR) shah Ds obtained Irom FEMA prbr M final map alNxoval or issuance of Wibing pennNS, whichever odors ttnt. A Letter of Map Raviabn (LOMR) shall ne Issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or irrprovemerq aaepance, whchever occurs lust _ 3 A final drainage study snarl be submitted to and approved by the Cdy Engineer pror tp noel map approval or the issuance of buibirg parrots, whichever oaure first. All drainage lacilttie5 snarl be installed as required by the Cay Ergirteer. Y ~ 1/91 I I of 11 ~~~~'tj 4 A permit tram the County Fbod Control Cistrlct 15 requied for work wdhln as rght-oLway '. 5 Trees are prohlbHed wihin S lest of the outside diameter of any public stone tlraln ploe measured tram the outer edge of a mature Iree trunk. J~ - 5. Public storm drain easements shall be graded t0 convey ovenlows in the event of a ~ J--~- Dbrhage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utllit/les / t Provbe separate uuliry services to each parcel incWdirg saneary sewerage system, water, JJ- gas, electrbpower, telephone, antl cable N (all underground) in aocortlarxR whh Ine Utility I/ Standards. Easemems shall oe provided as required. 27he devebper shall be responsible ror the relocatbn of existing utilNies as necessary. J~- 3. Water and sewer pWns shall co desgned and mnalmcted to meet the requirements of Ina -J~1- Cuwmorga County Water District (CCWD), Ranch Cucamonga Fire Protectbn District, and the Environmemal Heaeh Department of the County of San Bemardiro. A letter of compliance Irom the CCWD is required prior to linal map approval or issuance of pennas, whichever occurs first. O. Ganerel Rsqulrements and Approvals 1, The separate parcels COMained wahin the project boundaries shall be lagalty combined into IJ~-- one parcel prbr to issuance of bliWirq parmNS. 2. An easement for a pint use ddveway shall t» provided prbr to final map approval or issuance of builtlirq permts, whichever occurs first, for: 3. Prior to approval Of the final map a deposa shah be posted with the City coverirq IhB estimated cost of apporlbning the assassmeMS under Assessment DieMut artlorp the newt' seated parcels. J~- _/-/- a. EtiwaMarSan Sevaine Aroa Regonal MaiMine, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan I J_i-- Dramage Fees sheN De pib prior to linal map approval or prbr to W ildlrq Parma issuance A no map is inwNed. 5, PennNs shah 6e odairied from the tONOwirq agarciee for wok within Mew rlpM-0f-way: -/__ /- 6. A sgned coneanl and waNer lone to pin anNOr form the l.aw Entorcemem Commundy I JJ_ Fapleiee DYtrkf shatl W filed web the City Erfginesr prior to flrwl map aPWoval or the Issuance d buNtNrq pemWa, whichever oaurs INSt. Fomution ooars shah be Dome et' the Devebper. 7 Pror to tinalizatbn of arty devebgneM phase, sWfkient Nrlpfovement pWfe shah De cam- I J-J-. plated beyond the phase Dourfdaries to aaaura secondary access ant Nalnage protection to Ine satlsfagion of the CNy Erfgirteer. Phase 6ounderbe shah correspond ro bl lines shown on the approved tentalNe map. % ~ 1!91 I9 of 1: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 I 2C~i CITY OF RA`CHO CliCAb10:~G~1 STAFF REPORT ~j~. DA'R'E: November 20, 1991 .. TO: Mayor and Members o£ the City Council Jack Lam, ALCP, City Manager PROM: Hrad Buller, City Planner HY: Alan Warren, Associate Pla nher SU HJ ECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B - CITY GF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land 'ise Element Map from Medium Residential (E-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-e dwellina uni to per acre) for the following subareas within the Etiwanda and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan areas: 3• Approximately 27.89 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the east by F.t iwanda Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on [he south by covmercia lly designated land bordering Foothill Boulevard. The City will consider Low Residential (2-d dwelling units pet acre) as an alternative designation for this entire at ea - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, G9, 10, 15, 20 and 29. 5. Approximately 30.72 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-151 Freeway, on the east by East Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential de sl grated tan d, and on the south by Miller Avenue. The City will consider Low Residential 12-d dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use for this entire area - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-041-04 through 10, 1100-051-03, and 1100-061-02 through 04 and portions of 1100-071-01 and 02. 7. Approximately 10.09 acres bordered on the north and west by exirtrng Low M¢tlium Aesl den tial desi qna red land, on the east by existing Office designated land, and on the south by Base Line Road. The City will consider Office as an alternati•e land use for this entire area - APN: 227-131-34 through J6, 52, and 53. 8. Approximately 20.34 acres bordered on the north by the Sou them Pacific railway, on Che east by the Ontario II-15; Freeway, on the south by existing office desi qna red land, end on the west by existing Low Med rum designated land and divided in a nor tl:-south direction by East Avenue. The City will consl der Low Res ulential (2-d dwelling unite per acre) as an alt¢rn ative land use for this entire area - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-14 and 66. staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 91-02B 6 ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA November 20, 1991 Page 2 eNVLHUNMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANp ETI WANLA SPECIFIC PLAN AM END.MEYT 91-03 - CITY OF RANCF+O CUCAMONGA A proposal to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map from I4edium Residential (e-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medlum Residential (d-R dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas within the Etiwanda Speclf is P:a r.: 1. Approximately 27.89 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-16) Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential designated Sand, and on the south by covmercia lly designated land bordering Fm thi 11 Boulevard. The City will consider Low Resi dentiai f2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use for this entire area - APN: 227-271-02, O4, O5, 09, 10, 15, 20, and 29. 3. Approxi mateLy 30.72 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-15) Fc eeway, on the east by East Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the south by Miller Avenue. The City wi 11 consider Law Residential (2-4 dwelling units pet acre) dS an altetna ti ve Sand use for this entire area - APN: 1100-031-00, 1100-041-04 through 10, 1100-051-03, and 1100-061-02 through 04 and portions of 1100-071-01 and 02. 5. App roil mately 10.09 acres bordered on the north and west by existing Ww Medium Re side neial designated land, on the east by existing Office designated land, and on the south by 9ase Line Road. The City wi 11 consider Office Professional as an alternative land use for [his entire area - APN: 227-131-31 through 36, 52, and 53. 5. Approximately 20.34 acres ho rdezed on the north by the Southern Pacific rai iwa y, on [he east by the Onta ri.o (I-151 Freeway, on the south by existing Office designated land, and on the west by existing Low Medium designated land and divided in a north-south direction by East Avenue. The Crty will consider Low Resi dent i,al f2-4 dwelling units per aczel as an alternative land use for th ie entire area - APN: 227-131-OS and 227-141-14 and 66. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative pecla ration. HBC0MM~7DATION At its meeting of August 28, 1991, the Planning Commission rec ortvnen de] General Plan Amendment. proposal and accompanying Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment. to change the Medium (R-14 dwelling unit per acre) designation ^,.o Lnw- Mediwn (4-H dwelling units per acre) Eor Subarea 7 and for the western pn rt ~nr. of Su ha rea 9 be approved. The Comm rscion also recommended the similar land ns~• rh an qe propo cols for Subareas 3, 5, and the eastern portion of Subarea 9 denied. ` Zlo CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 91-G2H b F,SPA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNGA November 20, 1991 Page 3 BACRGROpNp 6 OISCU55I Q7 Gn Jvly 17, 1991, the City Council held a public hearing on the eight subareas of Ger.=rat PLa r. Amendment 91-02H ar.d considered the Planning Commission recommendations of May 22 and 29, 1991. The Planning Commission had previously reviewed the staff recommendations and had made the feliowing recommendations: Subareas ~ 6 F - Deny the proposals to change the land use designations from Helium !5-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium (4-H dwelling units per acrel• Subarea 2 - Approve changing the land use designation Er om Medium to Commercial (Community commer -i al) and Office (Commercial Office) Eor those parcels not a part of GPA 90-02H and 91-01A. Subareas 3 5 5 - A 2-2 tie vote necessitated that the issue on charming the designation from Medium to Low-Medium was forwarded to the Council without a Pia nning Commission recommends tion• Subarea 4 6 7 - Approve changing the land use designation from Medium to Low- Medium. Subarea R - Approve charging t!:e western half cf the subarea m Law-Medium and deny changing the eastern portion leaving it with the Medium designation. ""ce City Council concurred with the Planning Cnmmissi nn findings for Subarea 1, .. 4, and 6 and adopted the recommended land use designat io ns• Regarding Subareas .3 and 5, the Council did not wish to make a determination without a re r. ommendation from the full Planning Ccmmission. In ad di do r., the Council noted that Subar_as 7 and H exhibi teal many of the characteristics and rnnditinns n` Subareas 3 and S and wished to have recommendations from the full Commission nn Subareas ~ and H also. ANrLY5I5 Cnp:es of the Planning Cnmmi scion Staff Report of May 22, 1991 (continued to Nay 29), Enr Subareas 3, 5, 6, and A are attached for the Council's review. Minutes for the Planning Commission meeting of August 28, 1991, are included for the C nun ci ;'s review of the Cnmm i.ss i.on's deliberations regarding the significant t ssves in the land use recommendations. Exhi hi r. "A" provides a rhart of 'he recent "ity Council/Planning Cnmmi.s si nn land use actions in the Et iwanda area. The Cnmmi scion's analyses of the issues can be summarized as follows: Saba yeas 1, 5, and the east portion of SuF,a rea a were recommended for denies; he cause of their Anse proximity to the I-15 Freeway and be cause multi-family de ve l.opme nt ar, these locations would provide more "crnative site planning to n,s see the noes e" impacts nn nearby r?silents. Subarea 7 and the wns U•r.•, 1 rt.:nn of Subarea 9 were recommended to he rhan yel to bow-Medium a5 they wn rn runs :de re'7 s~.iff u:ently removed from the freeway so as to not he affe ct wi fr~ewaY "raffle. .. Z CITY COWCTL STAFF REPORT GPA 91-02B b ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 20, 1991 Page 4 Environmental review recommendations are contained in the attached Staff. Report of May 22, 1991. These items have been advertised as a public Fearing in the Inland Va 11ey Dai 1y Bulletin news oaper, the pr ope rcies posted, and notices sent to a:.l property owners within 300 feet of the project sites. Respect~xYBy subryi}.ted, ., ~ ' G- ~ ~~ ~ Brad Bu er ~ City anner BB:AW/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - GPA Ae commen dations Exhibit "B" - GPA Recommendations Map Planning Commission Minutes of August 28, 1991 Planning Commission Staff Report of May 22, 1991 for Subareas 3, 5, ~, 6 B GPA Resolution o£ Denial for Subarea 3 ESPA Resolution of Denial for Subarea 1 vPA Resolution of Denial for Subarea 5 ESPA Resolution of Denial for Subarea 3 GPA Resolution of Approval for Subarea 7 ESPA Resolution of Approval for Subarea 5 GPA Resolution of Approval. F Denial for Subarea 9 ESPA Aeso lotion of Approval for Subarea 6, west portion ESPA Resclut ion of Denial for Subarea 6, east portion 21'L GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND APPROVALS AUGUST'91 APPLICATIONS Low LAND USE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Low Medium Medium Commercial O11ice GPA 90-028 ~ ~ • /// GPA 91-01A 0 0 • /// GPA 91-028 Subarea 1 ~ ' •,.'. /M/ Subarea 2 0 • /// • /// Subarea 3• ~ ~ ~•~. .. Subarea 4 0 • /// Subarea 5• 0 Subarea 6 ~ l :/ ~i /t , • ' ~ O Subarea T ~ ~ - - ^ . - ~ f-".,-1 Subarea 8' east porllon ~ 0 ITS west porllon r.. ~ existing designation, as of May, 1991 C~ Planning Commission recommendations - May '91 - 'August '91 /// City Council Approvals, July '91 Ezhlblt "A" 2. I .'~ Y~C01 ~ 5'YEF' T~ -"' recommsnd~d U LM~ ,_ L recommenced m nmdn M jTFM:GPA YI D2B, fiSYA 91,E - ~ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TI'iLEtGPARccommcndationsMao N EXHIBIT: "8" SCALE: Zh~y the trailer ie currently aupportetl by Z -.. c.^. x 4 inch board e. there are nn concrete pylons, and she trailer is r.ct skirted. Cnai rm an MCNiel stated the conditicns of aoc rc•:al indicate the pylons must qo into place and the skirting must Ce inataaed prior to occupancy. Mr. Campbell slated the modular unct F.ad never been used by the church. He card they only moved the unit to the site. He ,ndicated he aeketl the licensed moving eoneraetor it the temporary supporr. was sufficient antl was informed that it ie the legally accepted standard for temporary placement of bu ildings. He repo rtetl the modular building nod not shifted during the recent earthquake. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing Commissioner Valletta was concerned that the modular unit bo placed on a permanent foundation and be properly skirted to inhibit chiltlran from crawlrnq under the unit. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated the development plane show the skirting. Commissioner Melchor eharetl Commissioner Valletta's concerns. Ha asked that the wording be changed to indicate tae foundation would be fixed and improvements would satisfy all Building and Safety requirements. Notion: Moved by Melchor, eecontlad by MpNie 1, to ie sus a Negative Declarat lon and adopt [he resolutions approving Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 91-01 and Vartanre 91-07 with modification to require that the modular building be placed on a fixed foundation eatief ying all Building and Safety requiremsnu. Motion carrietl by the fallowing vob: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOy, VALLETTE NOE H: COMM YSS TONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carrlsd Th• Planni ng CommLSlon ncsssed from H~75 p. m. Co 8:40 p.m. R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDNEN'L 91-078 - CI'Y OE RANCHO CUC)fMONGA - A propoeei co amend the General Plan Gand Uas Element Map from Msd ium Rae idsnt ial (E-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Resident iel (4-E tlwslling unite per acre) for the followlnq subareas within the Etiwande and Foothill Boulevard Spec if Lc Plan areas: Planning Commission Bowles -8- Auquat iB. .. ~l5 3. Approximately 27.89 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario ~I-1E) Freeway, on the ea et by Et iwanda Avenue and existing Law Medrum Resident ial designated land, and on the south by conunercially designated lend bottlering Foothill Bcu ievartl. The City will consider Low Resident iel (2-4 duelling unite per acre) ae an alternative tlaeignation foX this entice area - APN: 227-211-02, 04, O5, 09, 10, 15, 20 and 29. 5. Approximately 30.72 acres bortleretl on the northwest by the Ontario (I- 1fi~ Freeway, on [he seat by Eae[ Avenue and ex ivt ing Low Mad ium Residential deaignatetl la ntl, antl on the south by Hiller Avenue. The City will consitlar Low Residential ~2-4 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative land uea for this entire area - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-041-04 through 30, 1100-051-03, and 1100-061-02 through 04 and po rt ions of 1100-071-01 and 07. 7. Approx imat sly 30.09 ecre• bordered on the north end west by ax ivt ing Low Medium Residential deeignated land, on the east by axiating office designated land, and on the couch by Baee Line Aoad. The City will consider office ae nn alternative land wee for this entire area - APN: 227-171-34 through 38, 52 through 54, and 61. d. Approximately 20.34 acres bordered on the north by the Southern Pacific railway, on the east by the Ontario (I-1fi) Freeway, on the south by existing office deeignated land, and on the wee! by existing Lou Medium designated land antl divided in a north-south direst ion b'y E est Avanu e. The City will consider Low Aesidential (2-4 dwelling un its per acre) ss en alternative lend use for this entire urea - APN: 227-131-OS and 22]-141-14 and fie. Staff ra commentle iesu ante of a Negative Declaration. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND E WANDA SPECIFIC PLAN A NONE 91 03 CITY CF PANCHO CUCANONGA - A proposal co amend the Et iwa nda Specific Plen Land ^ee Map from Hetlium Rea rtlen4al (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low Medium Reside ntial (4-B dwelling unite per acres for the following subareas within the Etiwanda Specific Plan: 1. Approximately 27.89 scree bordered on the notthwesi by the Ontario ~I-15) Freawey, on the east by Etiwantla Avenue and ex ivting Low Medium Raeidsnt ial dasignetetl land, and on the south by coamer cially deeignated lnnd bordering Foothill Boulevard. Tha Clty will co ne id er Low Reeitlential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative lantl wee fo[ this entire area - APN: 22 i-231-02, 04, O5, 09, ]0, 15, 20, and 29. 3. Approximately 70.72 ac re• bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I- 15) Freawey, on the east ^y Eaat Avenue antl ex iet ing Low Medium Reaitle nt iel deeignated land, antl on the south by Miller Avenue. The City will cone ider Low Resident ral ~2-4 dwelling unite par acre) ae an alternative land wee for this entire Brea - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-041-04 through 10, 1100-051-03, and 1100-0H1-02 through 04 and port ionn of 1100-071-01 and 02. 5. Approximately 10.09 scree bcrdered on the north and west by ex rating Law Medium Residential designated land, on the east by axiating Office deeignated land, and on the south by Daee Line Road. The City will conerder Off rte Prof eeeiona: as an alternative land uea [oc tnrs entire area - APN: 227-131-34 ehrough 36, 52 through 54, and 61. Planning Corm ieeror. Minutes =tit= Augu et 28, i95: Z~~ 6. Approximately 20.34 acres bcrdered on the ro rth by the Southern Pacific railway, on the ease by the ont ar io (I-16) Freeway, on the ecuth by axieti ng Office designated land, and on the west by existing Low Medium designated land and divided in a north-e oath direction by East Avenue. The City will consider Cow Residential (2-4 tlwelling units pet acre) ae an alternative land use for this entire area - APN: 227-131-06 and 227-1d1-1d and 66. Staff recommends ieeuance of a Negative Declaration. Alan Wart en, Associate Planner, prase nt ed the eta Ef cepnrt, cor ratted the APN number of suharea "/ to drop Parcels 227-131-54 antl 227-131-61, and Lnd rested a letter had been reserved from Fu Mai Limited Part nerehip opposing the redes ignat ran for Subarea E. Comm iaeio ner Valletta commented that the City Council had requested the rational for the Planning Commission rec ommentlat ions. Mr. Warren concurred antl indicated that if the Planning Commission gives differing cscommmdat ions on similar properties the reasoning should be et aced, wnetner it Da because of distance, relat ion ah ip to oG her propert is •, etc. Ha •aid that rationale would then be inc laded in the siaEt report to City Council. Chairman McN lei opened the pub lLc hearing. John Lin, 527 Wsst Foothill Bou hard, Arcadia, •ta[ad ha reprewnted Ghe owner o[ Subarea 3, He Lnd rested they felt the property is batter suited to high density, pert ie lly bacau9e o[ rte proximity to Commercial. Na diacueeed affordability and indicated that iE the des ignet icn ware lowetetl to Low Medium, 10,000 square toot iota wcu ld be requ ltad and Cha houses uou ld net be affordable. Ha commented Chet Subarea 6 had oHn designated Med lam and felt chat Subaru 3 •hculd ale remain Medium. Li Li Hwang, Fu Hai, 7168 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, referred to the August 28, 1991, letter from Garry Chen, requesiinq chat Suberss 5 remain Med lam Ru ldsnt ll. she stated Chet eM works in rul estate in the resale market. she thought the no l• and pollution from the freeway will discourage buyer who are already going to Fontana or Rialto because of pr le ing. Shs felt Subaren 5 •hould remain as Medium because Subarea 6 was let Medium. Sha ehought people would be willing to buy contlomin rum unit but not •ing la family home in the are because condominium units are uen e• esmpor¢y housing. Loren Fritz, 33104 Base Llne Road, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he owns the ant ire area dssignated e• Subaru 7 antl had lived tMn aloes 1973. He eaitl shat Subarea 6 had remained Msdlum end the two parcels to CN ust had been deeigneGd Office/COmmereisl. He uLd the City of Fontana recently changed the deeignat ion of 70 acre adjacent to the Cruway to Office and Cammun uy commercial. He commented that eau Line Road will be a major entrance co the City u a •lx-lens •GreeC and he felt Chet the strut would be too buoy (or adj scant •ingl family ruidsncu. He indicated he wa• not sure his property could be developed Lor Ot[i<e use becauw of the tra[f is floe. He requested hie property remain Medium. Planning Commies ran Minute ~- Augu ^t 28, :9r ~~~ Ed Greer, Bradfortl Company, 3935 West 11th Street, Suite L, Upland, et at etl he represent ed John Fowler, the owner of she weaCerly 30 acres of Subarea 0, west of East Avenue. Ne disagreed with at elf's analysis ana recommendations. He ditl not feel Commercial uses were fully cone id erect. Ne did not feel Chs area was eu ited for Reaitlent ial because cf she no rse from the freeway and the railroad tracks to ehe~ north. He thought the property would bs viable for Neighborhood Commer<ial in order to serve the res iden[ial area to the north. He commented that en on- antl off-ramp are proposed at Eaet Avenue from Route 3o. He requested a continuation for 30 days to allow time to Prepare findings and exhibits to support the area's being designated a^ Neighborhood commercial. Brad Roller, City Planner, stated that the pzopstiy owners for the east •ide of subarea 8 were currently out of the country. Hs as itl he had spoken with them by telephone earlier in the day and they sxprsssetl concern that the Planntng Commission mny reverse their original decision to recammsntl denial of the reclassification oC Chair property. He eCaud they had requested fns property designer tan remain Medium or be changed to Commercial. Hs said they did not feel their property was eu it able Por single family zesidentinl because of the proximity to tM freeway end railroad tracks. Hearing no further teat imony, Chairman McNiel cloeetl the public hearing. c e al Fla Ams d e t 91 01B t5 b rea 3~ d et'w nd 9~pec1[' P1 n Am dm n! 91-03 ISUbaree 11 Commissioner Chit tea felt that a Medium tlene ity for Subersa 3 would allow more creative planning and buffeting of the large exposers to Lne freeway, she eupportetl leaving the tleeignat ion at Metl ium. Commissioner Melcher reported that he had spent a gootl deal of time vie it ing ens propert ie• and talking with people in the area. Me ea id chat the Commie ion hatl previously recommended that Subarea 6 and the eaatsrn po rt ron of Subersa 8 remain Medium. He •a id a tie vote nod barn reached for Subareas 3 and 5 with two CommLSionen favoring the current designation of Medium. He felt the vote had shown that aC laasL some of the CommUaioMn felt Medium is the appropriate zoning for thoe• properties. Ha disagreed with staff's enelysi• tNt the freeway nolw L buffered on Subareas 3 and 5 bscauu they are below the frsewey. He said he had gone to several areas of Subareas 3 and 5 during •veninq rush hour end Celt the aces was very noisy. He stated Gnat on the eastern portion of subarea 8 the noise ie al i9hC l.y lee bseauee the adjacent traffic i• going down hill and the o£f-ramp confiqu ration somewhat shields the arse. He felt Medium to be appropriate for subareas 3 and 5 because of ehs noise end also the elevation of the freeway which will pe rm •C freeway driven to look tlown on ens area. He felt Metlium would allow creative site plenn ing to le hen th• no ice to the resitlente and ha thought a mare uni[orm level of maintenance would be afforded the prapetL iec. Ne commenced that when frsewey qo through single family roe Ldentlal areas, the areas to r,tl to deLSriorate, ae ten be assn along the 10 Freeway west of Montclair. He •eid he knew that Aoui• 30 will be eravera rnq some hiss neighborhoods in the City, but ne to It thou neighborhoods would become less des izable than other properties in the arse. Plannnnq Comm iec ion Minutes -ty August 2R, :9>: gig Commissioner Valletta felt that if single family homes will deteriorate bseaua• they era next Co the freeway, higher density projects would also deteriorate. She felt that if it made good planning sense to designate multi- family adj scant to freeways, then the eni ire corridor adjacent to both eidea of the proposed Route 30 shoo ltl have been designated ae Medium. She reported tTat the first hams she purchased abutted the 30 cc^reeway. She said it was below grade and they did not Find the no:ee to be a problem. Chairman McMiel stated freeways often cut through exist in9 nei9hbornoods with older, smaller houses. He felt that currently attention ie being paid to sound attonuat ion and beautification, and he thought that virtually all of the problems ten teaeonab ly Da mitigated whether the area i• tlovslopvd a• Hotlium or Low Res ident isl. He said the City council nod direct sd a review of propertie• foc you ib is reelae•ificat ion whore it makes senor to reduce the level of multi-family dovQopment, He did not feel singL-family properties adj acsnt to Aout• 30 will bo tioubletl by rho freeway bat auu wand at bnuation walls will ba erected. Ne eai^ the walls will also block tna view corridors. Commieeionor Tolstoy agreed with Commissioner Mslchar. Ha thought that Medium Rea idantial could better be designed to buffer the •Lfect• of the adjacent commercial property an Foothili. Commie toner Chit tea Lelt a well-des igned Medium prof oct would allow f lexibll ity to move the bulk o[ the living aroa• away from rho fraewey and make Ghe 11fHtyla of Chow living there cha moot attract Lvo. Sha Colt Chat would bo praLrab l• to the limitations impowd by small lot• crawtled up against the freeway. Commissioner Tolstoy felt Cne view from the freeway will also Do improved by a nigher Jana ity ptojoet. Commie toner Melchor tiered that in previous dlacuseion• regardLnq the Low Medium areas, tM Etiwanda Specific Plan would nave to ba mod Lfied to permit development in the mid-tangs of eM done it y, commiso loner Vallotto aakad the lot eiz• minimum for Law Medium and Medium within rho Etiwanda Spact[SC Plan. Mr. Buller atetad Chat the basis •tandard• of the Et iwentla Spacitie Plan require • minimum average 30,000 square foot lot for Doth Low Medium and Medium with a minimum •lsa of 7,200 •quars fort. Ha wid up to 8 dwelling unite can ba obtained for Low Medium and 14 Cor Mod Lum under optional etantlard• chairman McNlal felt the Commlu ion may be diacauntinq what could occur under today's •Gndarda. Mo[SOn: Mavad by Chitiae, uconded Dy Ms1eMr, eo adopt ruolut tone recommending denial a• amended for Environmental Aeuaomant end Canaral Plan Amendment 91-028 (SUDaru 3) antl Environmental bwuniant and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 91-03 (Subarea 1). Motion Carr tad Dy the following vote: Planning commlu ion Minutes -~. August 28, :59: uQ AYES: COMH IS SIONEAS: CHiTIEA. ME LCHER, TOLS TOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MCN IEL, VALLETTE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried . . . . + ce a n e dm ub a nd 'w d S c' 'c an n 91-03 /SUbaraa 31 Commiuloner He1eMt staced hie comments were the came a• fot Subarea 3. Commiaeionei• ToLtoy and Chit tee concurred. Motlon: Moved Dy Cult ice, secontled by MQ[Mr, to adopt ruolut ion• recommending tlenial as amendetl for Environmental Auessment and General Plen Amendment 91-029 (SUbaraa E( end Environmental Asasaamen[ and Etlwanda Speci Eic PSan Amendment 91-03 (Subarea 3(. Mction carried by the follOwinq vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NCNIEL, VALLETTE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried General Plan Amendment 91-029 15 ub area 71 and Etiwanda Soecif is Plan Amendment 91-03 ISUbarea 51 Commi a inner Melc het stated he had vie iced the property and it was clearly not impacted in the came way as the prapertiea immediately adjacent to ane freeway, although the aouthust corner la subject to the noiq of gave Line Road and the off-ramp, Me felt Lou Medium would De •atl dactory. Commissioner ToLtoy agrod. Chairman McNlel commented Coat the property owner had requested Office/ Profsasional Dacauw M felt tM property immediately to tM east will be difficult to access. Comminioner Chit ice felt the request had come merit. She thought perhaps th• property should Dr masts[ planned in conjunction with the property adjacent to tM freeway. Commissioner Melchor asked if a meeCer plan requ iremMt could bs added. He ind ieatsd the property would then be buffered on the north and wee[ by Low Mstl ium dove lapment. He asked i[ the transit loo from Offic•/Profoaional cc Low Medium is generally succeesful. Planning Commieeion Minutes -~ August Ze, :99 ~2~ chairman HcNlel commentetl that generally such trans is ions are appropriately buffered with landscaping to mitigate light overflow oroblems. Comm iaslonei Melcher convnanted that 20 percent retail woultl b¢ permitted in Office/Professional, and he wondered if devalo pera would then request fre9way- related uses. Nr. Buller stated the Etlwantla 5peciEic Plan allows a va riecy of uses uh ich are permLtted or Condit tensity permitted. commissioner Melchor tali permitting a designation which woultl allow 20 percent Commercial uu• would dilute the Commercial in other ease. He thought that freeway-related uea• are generally nigh-intensity uses, which he did not fool would be dssirab le in this area because o[ the class proximity to residences. Chairman McNlel commented eha[ Fontana recently re-class ified property in the arse from OEf is •/PZOfesl ionel to Commercial, citing lack of demand for Offiu/ Professional. Mz. Duller stated mere is a similar land pactern of Office/Professional and tow Medium at LM corner of I-15 and E[iwanda. Ha saltl Lhat i• not an uncommon transition of land uses. Chairman McNlel felt that if the Commie LOn changed Lhe des lgnat ion from Retitlent ial to Off tee/Profess ions 1, there would bs pauure to change to Commercial based on the currant market. Mr. Ruller cammsnted Chet in the paec when ocher property owners have approecMd the City La letleeignate from Res identtal to Commercial, the Planning commission hs• directed the applicant Go formally apply for such a eedeeignat Lon. He et ated further analysis of the remiEieat ions of office/Profess tonal would be neetletl, He suggested eha commission may wish co defer action or reclau ify the area e• Low Medium. He indiuGd the commission could direct staff to research further or could direct staff to cork in response to any applications •ubmitud by the property owner, including any neceeury LraffLc studies, etc. Mr. Weran •tsUd that circa lac ion would be one oC the coneiderat ions for of rice/Proteselonal use. He stead that the Negative Dee laatlon was recommended only Cor Ruldenl is 1. Chairmen McNlel felt CM ow Mr should pursue Office/Profee ei¢nal. Commiesionet Ch it tee felt staff should pursue the Office /Profess io nal designation. Comm ieeicnsr val lecc• agreed with commieeionsr Ch it tea. C¢mmlu inner Melcher fe li the arse le currently eapeDle of producing a higher number of unlu eo long a• LC remains clasei[ietl a• Medium. He preferred the Planning Commle•tan Minutes ~ Pu qu et 2B, 199 ~ZZ~ consideration of Office/Profe es ion al be undertaken in response to an applicant's request eo that fees would be generated. Comma stoner Valletta agreed that was a vel id point. She felt if the property owner wishes Office/Proteseione 1, they should justify ouch a designation. Chairman NcNisl tlid not feel it would be feasible for the property owner to file the necueary paperwork and go through the proaH• before tN next round of General Plan Amentlmenu. Na felt the Cammiuion •hou ltl rsdeeignate the area a• Low Medium, whim would thus place the burtlen of applying for Off ice/Piofeu tonal On the thou !dare Of the applicant Commiuioner Melchor thought Lt eeemetl almost unnscuesry Co redeeignnh the area ae Lou Medium, but folt the property owner would not pursue Office/Professional while iN property i• classified es Netlium. Mr. Buller euggesUd the commission may direct staff to place the item on the work pzagram if money should become aveilaDle. Motion: Moved by ToLtoy, sacontled Dy Valletta, to recommend inuancs of a Negative Declaration and to adopt the roolutione recommending approval of Environmental As Nee:Mnt antl General Plan Amendment 91-023 (Subarea 7) anE Environmental Aasusmsnt and Et iwanda Spscitic Plan Amendment 91-03 (Subarea S) chtnglnq the land cats du lgnet ion to Low Medium. Notion carried by Che following vote: AYES: CO101I SSI0NERS: CNITIEA, NCNIEL, MELCNER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Chairman MCNtsl asked if the Commiseionere felt the item should bs placatl on the work program Lf time wars eve ilab U. Commissioner Toletoy stated he would prefer to wait until the owner applletl. chairman McNlel agrnd that the work Program lint is rather exbnslvs. commissioner Chitlsa agreed that it is a low pr Lority item. I[ wa• the conuneu• o[ ehs Commission that the item woe Ltl nor be placed on the work program. Cans al P1 Ame dme C 91-078 tSUba a B~ a d Eti d Sw 'fl P1 n A. d c 41-03 !Subarea 61 commie toner Mslcher stated that baaetl on hie visit, ha felt the impacts of the downhill freeway noise is same what less. He felt ehs eutern portion of Planning Commission Ninu[ea !may August 7B, :?9: y22 she •iu i• batter designated as Medium. He thought she western portion to be clearly separate and the noise impacts were less on the western portion. He felt it was appropriate to designate the westerly portion as Low Hedium. Mot icn: Moved by Me leher, seconded by Tolstcy, to recommend issuance of a Negative Deblarat ion and to adopt the reaolut ions recommending approval of Environmental A+eecsment and General Plan Amendment 91-028 (Subarea E) and Env ironmsnt al Aeees ement and Et iwanda Spsci£ic Plan Amendment 91-03 ($ubarva 6) changing Che land uo designer ion Co Low Medium for the westerly portion. Mat ion cart ied by the following vote: AYES: COMNTSS IONERS: CH ITIEA, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETT6 NOES: COMMISSIONERS= MCNIEL ABSENT: COMNTSSIONERS: NONE -carried Chairman McNiel stated he felt the entire subarea should be ndu Lgnated a+ Low Nediwu. Mi. Watnn +t at ed tM recommentlac io nD would be Forwarded to city council with eM next cycle of GMeral Plan Ammdmente. He said they would be forwarded at the same time a any recommendations regarding redo ign at ioN Eor the Victoria Community are. Mr. Bul3sr stated that it any property owner +hould tluise Commercial, OfEi<e/Proteseional, or any other zoning, they could submit an application. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS H. ONSSDEA TION OF FORMAL RESPONSE TO ROUTE 30 E%TENSION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ ENVI RONMSNTAi IMPACT STATEMENT IEIR/FIST Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, pr//ented the Ka[L report. Xe sported that the HL/torlc Prewtvation Commission had con+idered the report the prwiou• waning and accepted the Buff repo re and recommended It Da forwarded Co CM City Caunell reltereting the importanu of requutinq that mitigation meuuru be more complebly deG iled and anelyvd by caltran/ and • spec if is timeline accompany the mlt igat ion measure. Ma •taeed tMy further requested that additional document at SOn be provided in the EIR/EIS regarding the unique A istorical and architectural significance of tM Maloof property. CommU+loner To lstoy caked how sufE felt about Fontane'e requpL for a Cherry Avenue interchange. Mr. Nendenon repl led that +taf[ ha• nos race Lved CM tlatt in order to study circulation and lend uw Suuea. Planning CommL^ion Minute -"~,- Augu/t Ze, :39: a~3 Commies inner Valletta agreed with the full Freeway alternative. Shs felt that some concerns rated by La Verne and Claremont also apply to Rancho Cucamonga. She etabd she understood the reaecning for Rancho Cue amonga'• requut for interchange wary mile, but she thought that moat Ereway do not have interchanges very mile. She wondered LE the more frequent interchanges would not rain come environmental concerns Eor the surrounding residences ceuud by not only the on-/off-ramps but also the lighting and •lgnage. Sha asked the rationale for hwinq tM fruway slwated becauw she Eelt that would cauu additional Lepacts on rbident ial dwelopmants. She asked if it would bs poasibL to deprau the freeway even if it meant losing en interchange or two tc offut tM cost of the depruud freeway. Mr. Nendeison [alt La Vwne and Claremont failed to pre-plan for the freeway when they approved developsent within the Corr itlor area. He said the City has tequuted interchanges in aree• chore the City ha• ut aside land for buffering. Commissioner ToLtoy commenGd that the during the formulation of the General Plan, the Planning Commiuion and City Council took tM freeway into consideration. Ne said the City had always counted on a freeway and laid out strut patterns Daud on one-miL interchanges. Xe thought that Claremont end La Verv were against tN freeway in the beginning. Ne supported the one-miL interchange. Ne felt the fruway would need to be •lwated beeaue of the drainage problems. Commisa loner Val LtG stated [hat Le Verne and Claremont •n puahinq [or the freeway to be below grade because of the impact on the surrounding tesidencu. SM thought Rancho Cucamonga should alto push to have a• much of the freeway a• you 1DU to he at or below grade. She thought the community will be divided betwun ust and west Dy the major etreU at the ineerchangu. Chairman HcHiel felt the fewer the on-/off-ramps, the greabr the divUion in the community. Xe thought that if interchanges ate only every two miles, the impact would De grueer on tM •ast/watt surface struts. CommUSloner ToLtoy [alt !t i• importene to get traffic oft the local strafe and onto the freeway a quickly as pose ib l• end have it ea it tM freeway as clou a possible to ultimaL dutinations~ Ha •upporUd the full freeway option wleh SnGrchange very mile. Na also wpported Pontene'• nquut Ear resolution of Cherry avenue. Commi a inner Vallettl sGUd that east of Hevan Cha fruway L propo ud to be above ground. SM wu concerned chat the high winds in the area will cauu accidents on the •lwated fruway. SM felt that the location of the rock crusher will aLo generate additional tru ck e, adding to the danger. Mr. Render wn stated [het an access problem from the rock crusher [o the fruway hu bun documenGd. Plenty ing Commie ion Minu 4e -~. August ZS, :99: 2Z -- C[TY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 22, 1991 T'D: Chairmen and Members of the Planning Commission PROM: Brad Buller, City Planner eY: Vince Bertoni, Assistant Planner Alan Marren, lwaociate Planner SUBJECT: P IRO A F •T a P 1 D9B- CITY OF `aN ND ,CaMnN-a - A prePODLl LO amend the General Plan Land Oae Element Map from Medium Reaidential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Lox Medium Reaidential (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) for the following subareas within the Etixanda and eoothill Boulevard Specific elan areas: 1. Approximately 14.20 acraa bordered an [Re nortn by eoothill Boulevard, on the east by the eastern City limits, on the aoutn by existing Lor lbditw Reaidential designated land, and on the rest by a utility corridor - APN: 229-041-30. 2. Approximately 3E. 46 acres bordered on the north by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan boundary, which is approximately 530 feet nocLR of Foothill Boulevard; on tho east Dy a utility couidor; on the aoutR Dy Foothill Boulevard; and on the west by Etiwanda Avenue. The City will consider Commezci sl and office as alternative land use designations for this entire area - APN: 1100-161-01 through 04 and a portion of 1100- 201-01. 3. Approximately 27.89 acraa bordered on Che noctRweat Dy the Ontario (I-151 Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda Avanua and existing Low Medium Reaidential designated land, and on the south by conmercially designated land bordering Foothill Boulevard. The City will consider Law Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acrel as an alternative land use designation for thin antize area - APN: 227-211-02, 04, O5, 09, 10, 15, 20, and 29. 4. Approximately 87,52 acraa bordered on the north by Miller Avenue: on the east by East Avenue and a utility corzido r; on the south by the Foothill Boulevard Specific elan boundary, rnich is approximately 530 feet north of Foothill Boulava rd; and on the west by Etiwanda Avenue, The City will consider Low 0.esidentlel (2-4 dwelling unite per ac rel as an altemat ive land use designation Eor this antize area - APN: 1100-131-01 and 02, 1100-141-01 and 02, 1100-161- 01 and 02, 1100-181-01 and 02, and 1100-191-01. 5. Approximately 30.72 acres bordered on the nazthwest by the Ontario (I-16) Freeway, on the east by Eaat Avenue and existing Low Medium Reaidential designated land, and on the soutR by Millar Avenue. TRe City will consider LOw Reaidential (2-4 dwelling units per ac rel as an alternative land uaa deaigns[SOn for this entire area. APN: 1100-031-OB, 1100-041-04 thzougn 30, 1100- 051-03, and 1100-061-02 through 04 and portions of 1100-071-01 and 02. PLANNING COlPtI55ION oTAFF REPORT GPA 91 -02B, FSPA 91-02, 6 ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF PANCXO CUCAMONGA Mny 22, 1991 Page 2 6. Approximately 11.09 aczes bordered on the north by Base Lino Road, on the southeast by the Ontario (I-151 Freeway, and on the west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land. Tha City rill consider Office and Neignborhood Commercial as alternative land use deeigna[iom for this anti re azea - APN: 1100-051- 01 and 02 and 1100-061-01. 7. Approximately 10.09 acres bordezed on the north and went by existing Low Medium Residential designated land, on the east by existing Office designated land, and On Che south by Base Line Rand. The City will consider Office as an alternative land use designation for tail entice area - APN: 227-131-34 through 36, 52 through 54, and 61, 8. Approximately 20.34 acres bordered on the north by the Southern Pacitic railway, on the east by the Ontario (1 -15) Freeway, on the soutA by existing Office designated land, and on Lae west by exlatinq Low Medium designated land and divided in a north-south direction Dy Eaat Avenue. The City will consider Low ibaidential 12-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for this entire area - APN: 227-131-OS and 227-141-14 and 66. - A propoeal tc amend the Foothill Boulevard 9pecitic Plan Lend Vae Map from Medium Reelden[Sal (5-14 dwelling units pet acre) to Lor Medium Resident ial (4-S drelling unite per acre) for the following subareas rithin the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan: 1. Approximwtely 14.20 acres bordered on tae north by eoothill Boulevard, on the east by [ha eastern City lixdts, on the south Dy existing Lor Medium Residential designated land, and on the rent Dy a utility corridor - APN: 229-041-10. 2. Approximately 18.46 acres bordered on the north by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Boundary, which Sa appzoximstely 530 feat north of Foothill Boulevard; an the eASt by a utility corridor; on the south by Foothill Boulevard; end on Lhs waat by Etiranda Avenue. The City will consider Coamunity Coamercial, Commercial office, anQ SPoCialty Commrcial as alternative land use designations for [hie entiro area - APN: 1100-161- 01 [hrough 04 and a portion of 1100-201-01. 91-03 CITY ne AN x0 r ArnN-A - A propoeal Co amend the Etiwanda SPoCific Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite pee acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-S dwelling unite per acre) for Chs following subareae within the Etiwande Specific Plan: 1. Approximately 27.89 acrsa bordezed on the norihweat by the Ontario (I-151 Freeway, on the Beat by Etiwenda Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the south Dy commazcially designated land bo cdacing Foothill Boulevard. The City will consider Low Reeidenti al (2-4 dwelling unite per ac zel as an alternat Sve land use designation for this entire Brea - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15r 20, and 29, Z2 ~ PLANNING CClHISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-028, FSPA 91-02, L ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCNO CNCAMONGA Hay 22, 1991 Pages 3 2. Approximately 87.52 acres bordered on the north by Miller Avenue; on the east by East Avenue and a utility corridor; on the south Dy the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan boundary, which is approximately 530 feet north of Foothill Bculeva rd; and on the went by Etiwands AVEnnE. The City will consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land use designation for thin entire area - APN: 1100-131- 01 and 02, 1100-141-01 and 02, 1100-151-01 and 02, 1100-181-01 and 02 and 1100-191-01. 3. Approximately 30.72 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on [he east 6y East Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the south by Miller Avenue. The City will consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for this entire area - APN: 1100-031-0e, 1100-041-04 through 10, 1100- 051-03, and 1100-061-02 through 04 and portions of 1100-071-01 and 02. 4. Approximately 11.09 acres bordered on the north by Bate Line Aoad, on the southeast by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, and on the west by exi stin7 Low Medium Residential designated land. The City rill consider Office Professional and Convenience Commercial as alternative land use designations for this entire area - APN: 1300-051-01 and 02 and 1100-061-01. 5. App co:Smartly 10.09 acres bordered on the north and west by existing Lor Medium Residential designated land, on the east by existing Office designated land, and on tRe south by Base Line Road. The City will Consider Office Professional as an alternative land use designation for this entire aces - APN: 227-131-34 through 36, 52 through 54, and 61. 6. Approximately 20.34 acres bordered on the north Dy the Southern Pacific railway, on the east by the Ontario (I -13) Freeway, on the south by exiatinq Office designated land, and on the west by exiatinq Low Medium Residential designated land and divided in a north- south direction by Eas[ Avenue. The City will consider Low Residential {2-4 drelling unite per ac rel as an alternative land use designa[ion for this entice area - APN: 227-131-OS and 227-141-14 and 66. wa xcan nm L DlcCncerON; The City Council held public workshops on August 9, 1990, and aanuacy 31, 1991, rsgaxding multiple family housing development in the City. These workshops arose from the citizens' concerns regarding the increasing development of multiple family dwelling units and the decreesi ng nunibac of single family dwelling unit developments which are gradually changing the community's residential character. Prior to these workahopa, City staff reviewed the current statue of multiple family housing. Using various scenarios, staff identitied the effects on City revenues and services if multiple Lamily undeveloped land was rezoneQ to single family or other non-residential Qesignatione. During these rorkahopa, citizens and City Council members voiced concern over increased traffic volumes, increased demands on City services, and ova cc rordi ng in local schools, rhich were all perceived to be linked to the increasing number of multiple family drelling unit developments. As a result oC these workahopa, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to develop 22~ PLANNING CClafI SSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-02B, FSPA 91-02, i ES PA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA May 22, 1991 Yage 4 recovmiendations to reduce the community's amount and density of vacant multiple family land through the City's formal land use amendment process to a build-out ratio of 32-35 percent for multiple family unite. An amendment proceaa has been established to review land use changes for Etiranda, Victoria, and tae restern general City area. eacause of the large amount of vacant multiple family land which does not have development application submitted, the 6tlwanda area is the first portion of the City that the Planning Coaminion will review. There are 50 properties under consideration totalling appxoxima[ely 220.31 acres of land designated Medium Residential (0- 14 dwelling units pee acre). The study area has been divided into eight subareas (see attached map)• The Planning Commission and City Council may act on the entire study area as a whole, they may act on the subareas separately, or they msy act on propertlee individually. The Planning Covmiaslon and City Council will also consider alternative land uses as indicated in this report. In order to make the proposed changes, three separate City doc~mients must De amended. The General Plan Amendment is necessary to modify tae General Plan Land Use Map that provides genaralizatl land uses for the City. Tae Etiwanda and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendments will modify tae land use zoning sups in those documents co be in conformance with the new General Plsn designations. On April 23, 1991, staff conducted a neighborhood meeting vita the affected property owners and those rithin 300 Eaat of the study area of the City-initiated General Plan Amendment. TAe intent of the meeting was Co give interested property owners the opportunity to ask staff questions regarding the amendments. The main concern expressed at tae meeting was twat tae required miniamBn lot size was too large in the Lor Medium Residential district for single family detached products in. the Etiwanda SPoCific elan. An adjustment to the lot size requirements would require separate action by the Planning Commission or City Council Co initiate an application in thin regard. IZ. Auu.ygI e_; Because of the large number of pcopactias involved, the analysis will be divided into the following Lwo segments: A. A review of issues whicA generally apply to all the subareas within the application area and including cumulative affects of the land use amendment in total. B. A review of the subarea recovzmndatlons, alternatives, and lend specific issues relating to each proposed aaundtoent. A. Canw ral Issnwav 1. B.e±dwn[ial Lana uses; During [ha workshop reviews, staff's analyaia of the unit density reduction revolved acound the pcemisa that moat of the changes should stay within the residential land uaa categories. It was assumed that the leant amount of land use conf llcts would result Erom this approach, Therefore, staff b initial land use consideration far all the properties is to she next lower density range, Low Nedi um Residential (4-8 dwelling unite per acre). 22 ~ PLANNING COMIISSION aTAFF REPORT GPA 91 -02B, FSPA 91-02, i ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Nay 22, 1991 Page 5 This approacn nag acme added validity due to the original General Plan density ranges rhich included an expanded Medium Residential range of 9-19 dwelling unite per acre. Staff believes this psevi0ua range clearly indicated that within the Medium Pesldential designation, Low Medium Residential development could be al bred and perhaps be pseferaDle in certain situations. The Gene sal Plan Medium Residential designation was amended to s-14 dwelling units par acre to conform with the Development Dist riet Lor Medium Residential designation range on November 5, 1986 (GPA B6-03 Text). NduaiDa: The General Plan and respective specific plan amendment prcpasals are, as previously stated, [he result of City Council direciion to ensure a multiple family unit percentage of Detxeen 32 to 35 percent at [he City's build-out. Therefore, the anticipated future housing unit counts will ba significantly lorered if approval is given to theca land use proposals and future anticipated density reductions in norNern Victoria and the City's xest aide. Ths cumulative effects of the density reductions (city ride) on the anticipated number of new units yet to be deeeloped is as tolloxa: a. Tne total reduction in multiple family unite repcmants a 5 to R percent load in the aultiple family unit percentage at build out than chat is presently anticipated rith the existing land use designations. b. The total unit reduction at build-out will De betxsen 1,400-1,500, assua,inq 62.5 percent density range development. TDe decrease in multiple family units rill be just over 4,000 and the inc rases in single family unite rill near 2,600. c. In ragardn to the General Plan Nouaing Element, the unit reduc[Sona should not conflict with any specific policies, goals, or objectives. TDe Housing Elaernt provisions provide programs xhich aid in the development and Laprovement of the City's housing stock. Gana rally, programs which liar specific numbers of unite to be built or sided fall within the anticipated number of units expected under [ha amended build-out totals. Reductions in total build-out unite will result in greater portions of lox and vary low income unite, program-aided unite, etc., within the lover total of units yet to be developed. Also, the unit reductions x111 bring the anticipated total of build-out units within approxinwtely 94 pascent o[ Che total SCAG Regional Nouainq Needs Aaaeaement (RNNA) unit numbers for 1994; and about 76 percent of the very lox, low, and moderate units fur the acme period. Z zq PLANNING COl4fISSION JTAFF REPORT GPA 91-028, PSPA 91-02, i ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA May 22, 1991 Page 6 Of the range of unite the Housing &lement pzopoaea foz development up to 1994 (Program 3-A.1), the zevi aed build-out total of just above 10,000 unite falls withSn this anticipated range. R, haare.a Anal v+. - Refer to the following aectiona which aze divided by each study area; 230 Subarea 3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 23 ~ PLANNING COMMISSION oTAFF REPORT GPA 91-028, FSPA 91-02, G ESPa 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 22, 7991 Page 16 GiiiRaL PLAM AIRIIDIRIIT 90H-Rii 3 iTIRatlD1 BPiCIPIC -Lii )11~11mIT 3[fBARia 1 1, Prni t and Nra i , a. Sumo+ndJ ne r.. nd II•e and T^nt nc~ North - Ontario (I -16) Freeway South - Church and <amnarcial business, Regional Related Commercial and Caamrnlty Commercial in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan east - Etiranda avenue and Underdeveloped land, Low Radium Residential (~-8 drellinq unite per acre) and Medium Residential 19-11 dwelling unite per acre) Neat - Ontario II-16) Preeway b. fonw^at Plan ne•i wN nna; Project Site -Medium Residential (8-1~ dwelling unite per acre) North - Freeway South - Commercial East - Special Boulevard, Lor Medium Residential (~-8 dwelling units per acrel, and Medium Residential (8-lt dwelling units per acre) Nest - Freeway e, Site cha a wris i Tha eita is generally flat rith a natural average elope .ot leas tRen 5 percent, sloping Co Che soutA. The Ontario (I-16) Freeway embankment borders the entire length of the nortn and west boundary. a single family residence occupies the northeastern portion of the area. The plant material consists primarily of eucalyptus tree rindoxa and wild grasses. 2. Fn i "'°^t i A• Statf Raa reviewed Pact I of the Initial Study end completed Che Environmental CRecklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has Lound no significant adverse envirocueental impacts would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment. 3. r.wnd ^ew Anwtvwiw, a. Ann rte iw[ n f i.^ di i rh The area in question sursounde a sizeable Lor Medium area to the east, midray batxaan Foothill Boulevard and Miller avenue. afield inspection noted that the freeway traffic did not greatly affect one's perception of the rural atmospnere. This was due to the hign elevation of the roadway along the entire northwest border. Therefore, staff believes that the area in question exhibits very similar characteristics to the existing Low Medium Residential land to the east. The Lou Medium Residential land is primarily undeveloped rich a far single family residences fronting on Etiwanda Avenua. b. Conto rnunce rUh rh. r ..-,r er.^ ... .., The changing Lrom Medium Residential to Low Medium Residential at Chia lore[ ion raises no con[licts with General Plan or Etiwanda Specific Plan provisions, The change would 23Z PIAftatlNG COMMISSION $TaFF REPORT GPs. 91-028, FSPa 91-02, f ESPA 93-03 - CITY OF RaNCRO CUCaMONGA May 22, 1991 Page 17 better help promote the retention of rural chazacteriatica promoted by Ghe Etiranda Specific elan by reducing future residential danai[y. 0. Con dde ti f att ti n d ti To provide the Cowaission with alternatives to the existing and proposed deaignati one, staff has included an analysis of Low Aeaidential (2-A dwelling units per acre). Consideration of this site for Low Residential development should not present any significant land use conflicts. However, it rould not seem appropriate to place lean density on the site which is bordered on the east by the exiatinq Low Medium Residential land. Curren[ly, there Sa no Lor Residential land between Foothill Roulevaed and the fzeeray. If the Planning Commission Delievee thin alternative designation is more appropriate, a final determination could be made st this time because the enviro~ental analysis and concluaiona could not differ aignif scantly for LOr Residential as caoepared to Lor Medium Residential. Rem®enned Land nee: Staff rec oomsnda ehs exiatinq Medium Residential (B-1a dwllinq unite per acre) land uee designation ba changed to Lor Medium Raaidential (~-B dwlling unite per acre) for the properties located in Subarea 3 0[ this application. Staff believes the fol loving facts for findings can Da aside with this zeta®ndation: a. Ths properties located in Subarea 3 are suitable for the uses permitte6 in Che prapoaed General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan land uaa daaignationa and are compatible rith exiatinq and aurroundinq land uee deaignationa sa evidenced by the site's being Dorde red on the east by ehs same land uee designation. b. The proposed amendment x111 not have significant iv~acta on the environment nor on the aurroundinq properties as evidenced by tM findings and concluaiona liaGd in parts I and II o[ the Initial Environmental Study and the Lact Ghat the proposal could reduce the intensity of residential development on the subject propartiee. c. The proposed amendment is in conforaunca with the General Plan and etiranda Specific Plan Dy psamotinq CAa retention of the community's wral ataasphara through reduced residential unit denaitiee. General Plan and Etiranda Specific Plan Raaolutione of Approval axe attached for the Cwamieeion'a aonaideretion. 233 Subarea 5 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B Subarea 3 ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91 ~03 ,~~ ~~~ ,`, n \® .o 23L-{ PLANNING CgMIS SIGN ~PAFF REPORT GPA 91-028, FSPA 91-02, G ESPA 91-W - CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 22, 1991 Page 22 GLMiAaL iLAII 11RImIR11T aOYiAfi S 1TMA1mA STlCIiIC PLAIT AIRImImIT 90eARta, 3 1. P.~i C.+T end cites owarrint{on.; a, <nrr~ndl nQ~d {~ w wnA Tonlna• "lP' North - Ontario (I-151 Fzeexay South - Miller Avenue and undecdeveloped land, Medium Residential (8-14 dialling units per acre), and Lox Medium Resldential (4-9 dwelling units pec acre) in tae Etiranda Specific Flan East - EaaC Avenue and undeveloped land, Office in the City of Fontana (Nast End Specific Plan) Nest - Ontario (T-15) Fzeewny p, ~wrel plan nweinnation ; Project Site - Mediun Residential (E-14 dwelling unite per ac[el North - Freeway south - Secondary Artecial, Medium Reeidentlel (8-14 dwelling units per acce), anQ Lor Medium Residential (4-8 drellinq units pew acre) East - Secondary Arterial and OfL1ca (City of 6ontana) Meat - Freeway c, c+ a share. orris i~~; The aitb ie generally flat xith a elope of lean than 5 percent, eloping to the south. Tae Ontario (I-15) Fteevay embankment Dordeca the enure length of the north and rent boundary. Tares single family residences occupy the aouthreetern moat portion of the area. Tae plant materiel consists primarily of Eucalyptus tree windrows end wild greases. R.nvi ronwonr al Aaaweamwnt• Staff has reviered Pazt I of tRe Initial Study and coa~leted the Environmental Checklist, Bart II of the Initial Study, and has found no algnlficant adverse enviconmental impacts could occuc sa a caault of tM pcoposed Genazal Plan Amendmm~t and Etiwands Specific Flan Amendment. 3. i.+nA tie Ane!y~ie; a. ~preoriatenwaa of Ler Ned/~ Llaea in the Area; Tae awes in question sucrounda a sizeable area to tea southeast whica is designated Low Medium Residential at the coznez of East and Millet Avenues. A field inspection noted Ghat the fceeway t znffic did not greatly of lest the pecceptlon of a aural atmosphere ieatedtately adjacent to the roedway. Taws was due to the nigh elevation of the ioadvay along tea entire no ctaweat botdaz. The Lsaeray trsf fic vas aw ze noticeable Further east Into the exlatinq Lor Medium Maldential land, TaersEOre, staff believq that the arse in queatlon exhibits very aind lac charecteriet acs to tM existing Low Medium lantl to the Peat. The Low Medium land is primacily undeveloped with a few single family ceaidencaa fronting on Miller AyenUe. 235 PUNNING CO[41I SSION aTAFF REPORT GPA 91 -028r FSPA 91-02, G ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Hay 22r 1991 Page 23 b, f i h h r 1 el d ert Etl d~ 'f~ Plw^: The changing from Medium Residential to tow Medium Residential at this location raises no conflicts with General elan or Etiwands Specific Flan provisions. The change would better help promote the retention of rural characteristics promoted 6y tae Etiwanda Specitic Plan by reducing future residential density. c, To provide the Conmdssion with alternatives to the existing and proposed designations, staff has included an ana lysia of Low Residential (2-~ dwelling unite per acre). Consideration of Gh1s site for Low Residential development should not present any significant land use conflicts. However, it would not seem appropriate to place less density on tats site because it is bordered on the soots by existing Law Medium land, Currently, tae re is no Low Residential land beMaen Foothill BoulevaM and tae freeway. If the Planning Conmris aion believes this altsznative designation is more appropriate, teen a final deteemination may De made at this time because tea environmental analysis and conclusions could noe differ significantly for the Low Residential alternative compared to Low Medium Residential. q, R d a r e ^ Staff reconmiends the existing Medivm Residential (8-31 dwelling units per acre) land use deeignation De changed to Low Medium Reeidential (q-E dwelling units per acre) for the Properties located in Subarea 5 of Chia application. Staff Delieves the following facto for findings can be made with thin recommendation: a. The DroPorties located in Subarea 5 ace suitaDla for the uses permitted in the proposed General Plan and Etiwenda Specific Plan land use designations and are co~atible with existing and surrounding land use 6eaignations ae evidenced by the site's being bordered on the southeast by the sans land use designation, 6, The proposed amendment rill not have signiticant impacts on tae envi conment not on the surrounding properties as evidenced by tae findings and conclusions listed in Patta I end II of the Initial Envisonmental Study and the fact that the proposal would reduce tea intamity o[ residential development on the au6~ect properties. c. Tae pzopoeed amendment is in confoxauncs with the General Plan and etiranda Specitic Plen by proalotinq the retention of the coamunlty's coral e[mosphere through reduced residential densities. General Plan and Etiwenda Specific Plan Resolutions of Approval are attached for the Coamtssien's consideration. 23(~ ~~ Subarea 7 l3ENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B Subarea 5 ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 ~~~ ~~~ W ~ ,` n \® .+ ~-J I PLANNING COMMISSION aTAFF REPORT GPA 91 -02B~ FSPA 91-02, G ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF PANCriO CUCAMONGA May 22. 1991 Page 2B GOIiRaL PLAN AIRIIDIQMT SBB~Ria 7 LTINaNBa 8P8CIDIC PLAN AImO)MOIS 8U8-Aea 5 1. Prni Ann ¢Stw Ow. fyf ien; a. Sn *roundlen anA i.e and T.enl n; North - Underdeveloped. Lor Medium Residential (4-a duelling unite per acre) in tae Htirnnda Specific Plan South - Bese Line Road a+uf undeveloped land. Medium Raaidsntial (E-la dwelling units per acse) in the Etiwande Specific Plan East - Undeveloped lands Office Pzofeesional in tae Etiranda Specific Plan Neat - Under developed vita one single family zeaidence~ Low Medium Residential (~-B arelling units per acre) in tae Etiranda Specific Plan b. r+n ..1 P1 n need + i n . Project Site -Medium Residential (8-1a dwelling unite par acre) North - Lor Medium Residential (~-B dwelling units per acre) South - Special Boulevard and Medium Residential (8-11 dwelling unite per acre) East - Office Neat - Low Madl.laa Residential (a-8 dwelling unite par acre) c. S~ a cha a wrier i •; The site is occupied by a coamemial plant nursery '(lagal~ non-conforming atatual with a sizeable storage building auzrounded Dy open plant storage areas. 2. ypy±rnn.nwnt at waea.+rnt; Staff Aas reviewed Part I of the Initial Study end completed the Enoi ronmental Chacklist~ Part II of the Initial Study, and has found no significant advsrae environmental impacts would occur as a reeult of the proposed General plan end Etiranda Specific Plan Aumndmenta. 3. Land sae ~+lvwia; a. Ann rev (a nwaa of i++r Mwdlum Rwa1 .n dal +ew. in {hw Area: Tha subject aita Sa bordered on the north and went by largely undeveloped Low Medium Reaidantlal land. Changing Chia site to Lor Medium Raaidantial would continue the single fondly land use pattern. Thle site dl£fera from Subarea 6 because it Ss not isolated from adjacent propertiaa try the freeway and Baae Liner Road. Tha affect o[ the araa~s traffic activity should be significantly lean than the traffic in Subs wee 6 and thereby should make the aita more appropriate foc single family residential development. The propneed Office ueea io the spat are compatible with LOV Medium Resident lei ueea just as they are compatible with multiple family reaidentiai development. 2 3~ PLANNING COMfISSION ofAFF REPORT GPA 91-02B, FSYA 91-02, L ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA May 22, 1991 Page 29 b. pjpp: ~ The change in land use designation from Medium Residential Lo Low Medium Residential at thin location raises no inherent conflicts with General Plan oz Etiwanda Specific Plan provisions. c. To provide the Commission with alternatives Lo the existing and proposed daalgnationa, staff bas included the following analysis of tea Office (Office Professional in the Etiwanda Specific Plan! designation: Tne site Sa bordered on the seat by eziatlnq undeveloped office land, therefore the Office designation would appear to provide co~atibility to the area 6y continuing the existing Office land use westerly. As stated above, office activities are generally considered compatible with most residential development. Again, an ezpansion of Office urea in the Et iwanda Specific Plan does not promote the general underlining theme of retaining as much rural atmosphere as possible. in addition, ae with SuDarsa 6, staff believes Office uses would increase the !raffle Sn the area and potentially increase traffic volume in tM core area. If the Planning Commission Wlievea that this alternative designation is more appropriate, then a final determination should De wlLMeld until staff can provide en environmental analysis for the preferred alternative. 9. Rwcoaaawndwe t nd Gae: Staff ceco~nda the eziatinq Medium Residential (S-1a dwelling units per acre) land use dasignation be changed to for Me61um Residential (~-S dwlling units par acre) for the pzope:tiea located in Subarea 7 of this application. Staff believes the following facia for findings can be made with this cecommendetion; a. The properties located Sn Subarea 7 are aultaDle for the uaea perndtted in the proposed Ganezal Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan land uae deeignatlons and are compatible rith existing and surrounding land use designations as evidence6 by the site`s being bordered on the north and rear by the same lend uae designation. b. The proposed amendment rill not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the auczoundinq pcopert les as evidenced by the findings and concluaiona listed in Parts I and iI of the Initial Envizonmsnial Study and the fact [hat the proposal would reduce the intensity of residential development on the subject properties. c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and the E[Sranda Specific Plan by promoting the retention o[ the comounity's rural aUaoaphan through reduced residential densities. General Plan and Etiwanda specific Plan Reaolutiona of Approval are attached for the Coamdsaionb comide ration. 2 3~' i~~ ~/~~`~~ n ~ a Subarea 8 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91.028 Subarea 6 ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 24u PLAMIING COMMISSION aTAFF REPORT GPA 91-028, FSPA 91-02, i ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA MaY 22, 1991 Page 31 GiNiAAL PLYI LQ~IRR BBBAAta 8 iSIRANW 8P1CI/IC PL)al AImIDIQNS 9IIBARLa 6 1. Prej t d car p ~ Minn; a. Snr mnndl nQ anA Le and .oM no• North - Railroad Line and underdeveloped land, Lor Ibdium Residential (a-S dwelling units per acre) in the etiwande Specific Plan South - Ontario (I-15) Freeway East - Ontario (I-15) Freeway weal - Underdeveloped land, Low Medil~ Residential (i-S dwelling unite per acre) in the Etiwanda Specific Plan Project Site - xedium Residential (E-1~ dwelling unite per acre) NortA - Railway and Low Medium Residential (i-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Freeway East - Freeway west - Low Medium Residential (i-s dwelling units per ecml c. Sites na ra reria i -: The site is largely undeveloped with perimeter Eucalyptus windrows and wild greases sa the predominant plant metecial. TRe properties have a natural elope of leas than 5 percent end elope to the south with Eaat Avenue bisecting the site roughly in half along a norm-acuth axis. There ace two single Family residences, one on each aide of Eaet Avenue, in the southerly portion of the site. Fnrt(roaa,anr al A..wemm,nr; Staff has reviewed part I of the Initial Study and completed the Environmental CASCkliat, Part II of the Initial Study, and found no nignlficant adverse environmental impacts would occur sa a result of the proposed Oenacal Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment. 3, r.a nd Pee Anw lyN ., a. Amm i t Mwdi R SA i i i i th A An analyeie of a map of Chia site could lead to the assumption that t:le portion east of Eant Avenue might 6e subject to significant impact from bordering [ranaportation systems (Interatata 15 and the Southern Pacific Railway). However, afield inspection of this acne reveals that much of the freeway and the Base Lina Road sct ivity is screened by the elevated freeway o[f-reap along the southern boundary. In addition, reaeaccA shows that the railway along the northecn boundary is a bcanch line used only by a short local train, conaiatlnq of a locomotive and a far freight cars which make two ar three round tripe a reek. In genoral, the site dose not seem any leas appropriate, by its loceiion, for single family development than the adjoining Lor Medium Residential properties to the north, 2(-{ ~ PLANNING COMNISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-028, PSPA 91 -02, i ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 22, 1991 Page 32 b, Conln nnan ~ v/rh hw .e Plnn th £ti ~p rp ifir Elsa: TAe change lowland use designation from Medium Residential to Low Media Residential at Chic location raises no contlicta with General Plen or Etiranda Specific Plan provisions. c. 9onai dwratien of Alternntive neeicnntione: To provide the Commission with alts rnativea to the ezistinq and proposed designations, staff has included the following analysis of Low Residential (2-1 dwelling unite per sore). Conaidarstion of thin site far Lor Residential should net present any algnificant land use conflicts. Norever, it is staff's opinion that it would not be appropriate to place a lean intense lend use of Low Residential adjacent to Lor Medium Residen[ial land which borders thin alto on the north and teat in addition the the freeray and railroad line. Staff did not consider commrcial designations as appropriate due tc the problem of introducing more Sntense land uses adjacent to the existing single family properties. In addition, the eastern portion of Chia airs is effectively separated from Beae Lina Road end its properties and future bwinesa activities by tAa freeway oft-temp. This separation should limit its viability [or coaasescial uses. if the Planning Commission believes this alternative designaticn is more appropriate, Chen a final determination should bs rlthheld until staff can provide an enoironauntal analysis for the preferred alternative. 4, Rwcoe®wnded Ln nd Oaw; Staff recommends the existing Medium Reaidentisl (B-la dralling units per acre) land use designation be changed to Low ebdlum Raaidsntial (t-e dwelling units per acre) for the properties located in Subarea 8 of Chia application. Staff Delievea the following facia for findings can bs made rith Chia zecoamendation: a. TAe properties located in Subarea 8 era suitaDla for the uses permltteQ in the proposed General Plan end ELiwande Specific Plan land uas daaignationa and are compatibU rich azisting and surrounding land use dasignations as evidenced by the site's Winq bordered c; the north and rest by the acme lend use designation. b. The proposed anendment will not have al9nificant Smpacts on the soul ronaent nor on the su rroundinq properties as evidenced by the findings and concluaiona listed in Pacts I end II of eha Initial Environmental Study and the fact that the proposal rould reduce the intensity of residential development on the subject properties. c. Tha proposed amendment is in conformance witA the General Plan and Etirande Speci tic Plan by pramotinq the retention of the community's rural atmosphere through reduced raaidential densities. General Plan and 6tiwanda Specific Plan Reaolutiona of Approval are attached for the Commission's consideration, Z({ Z PLANNING COlMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-02B, FSPA 91-02, 6 ESPA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 22, 1991 Page 33 III. TA R^JI RO ^^ti A GS NT; Staff has reVlBMad Part Z Of the Initial Study and conpleted the Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found no significant adverse envi zotmiental impacts could occur as a result of the proposed General Plan, Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendments. The issue for consideration is a reduction of proposed land use intensi tY: therefore, staff believes the impact of development should not be more significant than originally described in the envizotm+ent al review of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Further, the reduction in potential future hcusing units does not affect the City's a6111ty to ivgrlement the goals and objectives of the General Plan Heusinq Element. N. CORRFSpON-PNCE• These items have beOrt advarti sad as a public hearing Sn the I t d yaltwV ^a+ty B+tlw in newspaper, the properties have been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project sites. V. RR"~+wuPNDAxIDN; If the Planning Commission concurs with staff's analysis, and believes the proposed Low Medium Residential and Commrcial deslgnationa are acceptable alternatives to the existing Radium Residential designations, it is recommended that the Planning Conmd scion ceco®end approval of General Plen Amendment 91-028, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 91 -03, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 91-02, by the adoption of attached Subarea Resolutions. A Resolution Cf Denial is included Lor Svba rea 6. Aespectfull auhai Br~ z ~1 City Planner BB:AM: vB/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A"- Exhibit "0^- Exhibit "C^ Exhibit ^D^ GPA 91-028, FSPA 91 -02, GPA 91-028, FSPA 91-02, GPA 91-02B, FSPA 91-02, GPA 91-02B, ESPA 91-03, GPA 91-020, ESPA 91-03, GPA 91-028, eSPA 91-03, GPA 91-020, ESPA 91-03, GPA 91-028, ESPA 91-03, GPA 91-028, ESPA 91 -03, General Plan Amend, Location Map Specifi c Plan Aannd. Location Map - Letter from Sea»a Banks - Letter Erom U.S. Homes Subarea 1 Resolution of Approval Subarea I Resolution of Approval Subarea 2-Low Medium Resolution of Approval Subarea 2-Low Radium Resolution of Approval Subarea 2-COmnrcial Resolution of Approval Subarea 2-COnmercial Resolution of Approval Subarea 3, Reaoluticn of Approval Subarea 1, Pesolution of Approval Subarea 4, Resolution of Approval Subarea 2, Resolution of Approval Subarea 5, Resolution of Approval Subarea 3, Resolution of Approval Subarea 6, Resolution of Dsniel Subarea 4, Resolution of Denial Subarea 7, Resolution of Approval Subarea 5, Resolution of Approval Subarea S, Resolution oC Approval Subarea 6, Resolution of Appcaval Z X13 Y'C?CAi1 E'BEE? -jr.hiy Ch: VL - „~-__- -.`_ L VL u ~ ~ ~_~~ ; -' ~ -. ~ / ~~ c ~: g; ~ ~lM~~ ~ y olr EUwr+ne. bu G.nuN Pbn Am.ndm.nt. 91~0YB LM P•~N lM - L.ne U.. Uolpn.Gon ® RAOPEATA:S CUARfXiIT OESICNAIED YfONY AESIOEMTIAI 1-111 DYELIINc CONSANiAA1N~Ef011 A~FD[SICNATION 10 l0Y YEDAW AFSBENi!Al (/-1 DYELEAW UNITS FER RCAE) j - Sub.ru No.. i W , i ~__ . y.~ ~- G / I ~ II Co~nT.~ LM C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ECM' GPA 91-02B PLA.'VNING DMSION TITLE: G.n.nl Pon Am.ne. Lecalen Mep y ~~ I EXHIBIT: •A• SCALE: LM I li!I OII. I i OI~ ~~ ``~ +``~ h`'`~ YIpiOA IA STREET .• ' '~L.' L _. ~-, ~ I ~ ' .-I LM %• •~ e~ I Eliw•na• SP•c111C Plan ! Ai••nain.M• 97-W j lM ~,1~i~~ ~$I,$~Q Foothill Blva. Sp.ciHe Pbn A•rua•lul• 91.04 I I~ III--OjP/_ r `t A ~~ •~~,h` I` LM - D61rie1 Clolpn•Hon ® MDPERTES CUMEMTIY DESIGNATED YFpXIY RESNIEXTUL N-1{ DXFLLIMC COXfI RAIN~FfpA~REpFSICXATIDM (~-IpOFF~~INC UXIiSFPEA ACREI -ESPA Subaru Mo•. FSPA Subaru No•. u , ---- ,~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STEM: ESPA 91.07, FSPA 91-pZ PLANNING DMSION TITLEao.•Inp PE.n A,r.na L •H M.p ±~ Z~~ EXHBIT: •B• SCALE: RESOLUTION N0. 9/ - a-~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCTL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGR, CALIFORNIA, DF.NYI NG GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02R, HllHAREA 3, TO AMEND THE GENEAAI. PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RE SIDENTTAL (5-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE} TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 14-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) POR APPROXIMATELY 27.89 ACRES OF LANG HORDERED ON THE NOATHWEET BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST HY ETIWANDA AVEI+UE AND EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RE STDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUT11 BY EXI STING COMMERCIAL DEST GN ATED LAND BORDE RZNG FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FI9DING5 IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-02, 06, O5, 09, 10, 15, 20, AND 29. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-02H as described in the title of this Aes olution• Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (i i) On August 28, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing en the application and recommended denial by the adoption of Resolution No. 91-126. (iii} On November 20, 1991, the City Council o£ the City of Aan rho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the applica<ion• fiY} All 1e 9a1 prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Aesoluti~n, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically fi.n ds as follows: !ai Subarea 3 of the application applies to approximately 27.A9 a::res of land, basically a triangular rnnf iquration, bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (i-15} Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda Avenue and existing Low Medium Hesident.ial designated land, and nn the sauhh by commercial designated land bordering Foothill Boulevard as shown nn Exhibit "A," and is pr esen t.iy ~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. GPA 91-028, SUBAREA 3 - CITY OF A.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 underdeveloped with a single family residence in the northeastern oor[ion. Sa i.d properties are currently deslgnated as Medium Residential (B-14 dwelling units per acre); and (b) '!'he property to th_ northwest of the subject site is designated freeway and is the Ontario (I-15) Freeway• The properties to the east are designated Low Medium Aes ide ntial and are underdeveloped with single family residences and on the opposite side of Eti wan da Avenue it is 3esi grated Medium Residential. The properties to the south are designated Commercial and are partially developed with mixed business activities. (c) :'his amendment may conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and may not provide for development, within the district, in a man rer consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (3) This amendment may not promote the goals and objectives of the Land use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious nt detrimental to the adjacent properti ea and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor nn the surrounding properties, but land use incompatibilities may result. 3. Based upon [he substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public heating and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the properties located in Bubarea 3 of the application are not suitably for the uses permitted Ln the proposed district and are incompatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the northwest by the I-15 freeway; and {b) That the proposed amendment would not have si gn if ir_ant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Environmental Study, but that land use incompat ibil itiea may result; and Ic) That the proposed amendment may not he in conformanre with the General Plan due to the potential of establishing incompat i6le land use relationships with single family uses and Significant vehicular Lr. of Eic of the adjacent freeway. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed aml cnnsi de red in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act o' 1970. However, this Council does not authorize the issuance of a Nega `.i ve ^.e claratinn because the land 'a se change may not promote the goals and object fives of the Genera]. Plan. 2 y CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION ND• GPA 91-02B, SUBAREA 3 - CITY OF P.. C. November 20, 1991 Page 3 5. Based upon the fin di nqs and conclusions set Eorth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council he rehy resolves that on the 20th day of November 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga denies General Plan Amendment No. 91-02B, Subarea 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 2 ~~~ - lr_hiy ch: VL _ ---._ - = L VL _ L LM -~~~ - ~~ _~ yi N.CoNtii.~ LM Comm. EUwmd• Aw• G•n•nl Pon Am.ndmmt• 9r Ox LM i Oft. ~I'011. `~ ~~ ~~ +~~~, \ ,... . LM. ~' j LM -lend Uc• Duipn•tion .,-.., . ® PIIOPEAiIES CUAAEXiLi DESICXAIEO YEDIUY / AFSIDFMiIAL IA-11 DtEIIING UNIiS PEA ACAFI UND EA COMSIOfRAiION AOA A[OfSIDMA"CN FO lOt YEDIUY RESIOEM1~Al LM (I'1 DtELIIXC UXI15 PER ACREI '' 1 SuXn•a No•. •f m.~eN. Park ~ W Cbrrj m. - ~--~ ~-~-•--~--ti Comm. -„ ~.•~3 ~~~ is N.Com1N., SuX•ru x •m•nd•d p•rs•b LM -~ Cl•~'' ~F~ ~.'`CfiO C~.,CA.~D~i CiA TE'S GPA 91028 __ PI_~\'~ItiG DM510~ ~Tm.E G.•.ra Pl.n Am.ne. l.~•e.n M•p ti I - F \'HIBI'i •n• SC4LE - RESOLUTION NG. q~,a~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ETI WANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENOM.ENT 91-03, SUBAREA 1, TO AMEND THE ET IWANDA SFECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (9-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW M£D IVM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 27.89 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE ,l'OATHWEST HY THE ONTARIO (I-16) FREEWAY, CN SHE EAST BY ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EXISTING LQW MEDIUM RE SIDF.NTIAL DESIGNATED LANG, AND ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING COMMERCIAL DESIGNATED LAND BORDERING FOOTHILL EOJL EVAAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-02, 04, O5, 09, 10, 15, 20, AND 29. A. Re citai s. fi) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application far Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Reso lotion. Hereinafter Sn this Resolution, the subject Et iwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) Or. August 28, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho r_ucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and denial by the adoption of Resolution No. 91-127 and also issued Reso lotion No. 91-126, recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 91-028, Subarea 3, be denied. (iii) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City pf Ranciin Cucamonga conducted a duly neti ced public hearing on the application. fiv) Ali legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have cccuzred. B• Reso lotion. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts sr~ fcrth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon subs [antial evidence presented to this Council dur:^.q the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, Snc ].u ding wrir!e.n and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby spec, i.fi ra lly finds as follows: (a) Subarea 1 of the application applies to approximately 27. P.9 acres of land, basically a triangular con.`iguration, bordered cn the northwese by the On [aria (I-15) Freeway, on the east by Et iwanda Avenue and existing Inw Medium Residential deli 9n ated land, and cn the south by Foo rhil.1 Bculevarl Z S~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. ESP 91-03, SVBAREA 1 - CITY OF A.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 Specific Plan (FSP)' Regional Related Commercial and Community Commercial desi grated land bordering Foothill Boulevard as shown on Exhibit "A 1," and is presently underdeveloped with a single family residence in the northeastern portion. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (5-14 dwelli nq units per acre); and (b) The ptoperty to the northwest of the subject site is designated freeway and is the Ontario (I-15) Freeway. The properties to the east are designated Low Medium Residential and are underdeveloped with single family residences and on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue it is designated Medium Residential. The properties to the south are designated FEP Re gtonal Related Commercial and Community Commercial and are partially developed with mixed business activities. (c) This amendment may conflict with the Land Uae Policies of the General Plan and of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and may not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan ana with related development; and (d) This amendment may not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding propert iear but land use incompatibilities may result. 3• Eased upon the substantial evidence presented to this council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 7 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the properties located in Subarea 1 of the application are not suitable for the urea permitted in the proposed district and are incompatible with ezi sting and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the northwest by the I-15 freeways and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment not the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Potts I and II of the Initial Environmental Study, but that land use incompatibilities may result; and (c) That the proposed amendment may not be in conformance with the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan due to the potential nf. establishing incompatible land use re la[ionahipe with single family uses and si qn ificant vehicular traffic of the adjacent freeway. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. However, this Council does not authorize the issuance of a Negative Declaration because the land use rhange may not promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan. 2;-i CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO• ESP 91-D 3, EURAREA 1 ~ CITY OF F.C. November 20, 1991 Pa 9e 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 7, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that on the 20th day of November 1991, the City Council of the city of Fancho Cucamonga denies Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment Na. 91-03, Subarea i. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ~~ Y.C?OAIA 5'ACF' -= VL - - L - ' V l - - ~ ~ _ L _ , LM ~ / F ~• \ `~ I I r'~ it IIIII~ ~ i. , ))\, 9p ,• . ~ u ~ ' Op / F~ / . I ~ mm # t ; IlAlyll, .CO ~~ w EN..na. sp•<iei< Pl.n ~ Am•nam.m. 9 t ~ 00 i i II ~ ~ Foothill Blvd. Sp.cdic Plm I l~iFf' t 4 ' A•r•ndrnent• 91-eZ LM !,o I LMI IV ' 'i LM - Di•Ni<t D••ien•tion ® PAOPEATIES CURAENiIT pESICNATIp YFDIUY i ' ~ ~ I AESIOENTIAL (A-I/ D~EILINC ~ ~ I r"'pp UXITS PEA A E! UMDER CDNSIDERAtIDN pR REDESICNA?ipN ~ 10 l0N YFDIUY AESIpFM1Ul ~ Op I ~~ LMI I4-1 pAfLLINp UNIT} PFA ACRE) ,'~~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ESPA Subn•• Not y ~~\,~~' ry ' ~ ~ FSPA Sub•w• No< 7 ' LM , t ~_-__~ - - lM ~ . di.T I e ' ~ . _ .~1 I r Reg.Rel.COmm~„C'~omm. I •--•_~ ~ C.Qomm.r~ ~", Regional Rele led SuMru uirn.nd.d p.re.b CIT'} GF RP1.ICHO CL'CA.'~10~`iGA (TE ~t ESPA 91.07, FSPA 91.04 PLS.\\IVG DMSIOS TAE sp.<,n< pLn Arn.nd L t M.P ~ ECHIRR •At• SCALE RESOLUTION N0. 91-208 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B, THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF SUBAREA 5, TO AMEND THE GENHRAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO IQW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) FOR APP AO%IMATII.Y 11.2 ACRES OF LAND HORDE RED ON Tk6 NORTHWEST HY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE SOUTH EY MILLER AVENVE, AND ON THE EAST BY E%ISTING LJW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LANG, APN S: 1100-041-04 THROUGH 10 AND DENYING THE NORTHERN PORTION OP SUBAREA 5, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE SOUTHERN PORTION FOR APP RO%IMATELY 19.52 ACRES OP LAND BORDER® Oti TFD: NORTHWEST BY TAE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST EY EAST AVENUE AND E%ISTING LOW-MHD IUM DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING MEDIUM AND LOW-MEDIUM DESIGNATED LAND - APNS: 1100-031-Oe, 1100-051-03, AND 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, AND A PORTION OP 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND MAEING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Fancho Cucamonga has filed an application Eor General Plan Amendment No. 91-02H as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the app lication.^ (1iI On August 28, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended denial by the adoption of Resolution No. 91-128. (iii) On November 20, 1991, the City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the app licatlon. (iv) All legal pzerequis ites prior to the adoption of th is Resolution have occurred. H. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, St Ss hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ay follows; 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facie set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. a~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 91-208 GPA 91-02R, SVBAREA 5 - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 2• Eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff rep orta, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) Subarea 5 of the application applies to approximately 30.72 acres of land, basically a linear configuration, bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (T-15) Fzeeway, on the east by East Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the south by Miller Avenue as shown on Exhibit "A," and is presently underdeveloped with three single family residences in the southwestern most portion. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and fb) The property to the northwest o£ the subject site is designated freeway and is the Ontario (I-15) Freeway. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Res.i dential and is underdeveloped with single family residences facing Miller Avenue and on the opposite side of East Avenue it is designated office (OFC) in the City of Fonts na 's West End Specific Plan. The property to the south on the opposite side of Miller Avenue is designated Medium Residential and ie vacant• (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Ylan and with related development Eor the southern portion of this subarea; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties, but land use incompatibilities may result for the northern pore ion of Subarea 5. 3. Based upon the au bat antial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the apecif is findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the properties located in the southern portion of Subarea 5 of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district by the site's compatibility with existing and surxounding land use designations as evidenced by the site being bordered on the south and east by the same land use designation with a proposed single family residential development proposal; and (b) That the location of the propert les in the northern portion may not be suitable for the uses permitted ir. the proposed diatr ict because the triangular site is bordered on two aides by slgni Eicant transportation facilities; and X55 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 91-208 GFA 91-028, SUBAREA 5 - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1997 Page 3 (c) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in parts I and II of the Initial Environmental Study, and that the proposed designation for the southern portion of Subarea 5 would reduce the intensity of future residential development on the subject properties; and (d) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by promoting the retention of Etiwanda's rural atmosphere through reduced residential unit densities. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California environmental quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby authorizes the issuance of a Negative Declaration for the southern portion of Subarea 3. 5. eased upon the findings and cone lueions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 and 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 20th day of November 1991, General Plan Amendment 97-028, southern portion of Subarea 5, to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low- Medium (4-8 dwaLling unite pez acre) for approximately 11.2 acres of land and denies the northern pottior. of Subarea 5 to amend the General Plan Land Use Map in the same manner as the soothe to portion ae shown on Exhibit ^A.^ 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. a s~ v'~C'DA'.A S'AFE' _ _ -._ -. _.. __ _. VL __ ~. _. L J LM ~ .~. ~. ~~;~N.COn~re LM ili i~ Oif.~ ' Oll. ~~ i ~ S~ a~ LM Comm. ~~ Comm. -_, ~~ ~LM'~~ Y ~ omm. Eliw code Area Genmel plan Amendments 91~gR LMI, LM - Lend uae Oeaignation ''. ~ ® PAOPER11E5 CUAREAP 1' OESM.NAIEO YEDIUY RfSIOENIIAL X-14 DaEILING UNITS PEA A AEI UNDER northern orlio CONSIOEAAiIOM OR REDESIGNAiION p i0 L0~ YEDNY AESIOENiIAI (4-X OYELLINC UXI1S PER ACRE) soulhmnipMtion I 1 Subarea No ;. ~~, i _I el m.~spN. park L 'I rmo4,_~~G ~L~ lit maw :~.•' ~R I~.Com M•' Subere• 2 emended parceb LM ITE'v1, GPA 91-028 C.'("Il' OF RAtiCHO CUCAIvIONGA (I(~~~ti~tiG [7 ~`~S~Oti TITl E'Geneul plan Amend. Loulmn Mep ', E.SHBIT 'A' SCALE RESOLVT ION NO. -/~- a(~ry' A AESOLOTI ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIF A,-~Aa~~FRN, o~~ ETIWANOA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, H A TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND VSE :fAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (B-14 DWELLING UNITE PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-e DWELLING UNZTS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 30.72 ACRES OF LAND HORDEPED ON THE NORTHWEST HY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST BY EADST/~AVpE"N~UnEa~, AND E%ISTING LOW ~e14C0 UMitn reiCMN1WD ~•~Awiyr~0I NG5 IN' SUPPORTE THEREOF BY APN:~~~~110~0-0.91-08, 1e~ 1100-051-03, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, AND PORTIONS OF 1100-071-01 AND 02. A• Recitals. (i( The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Etiwande Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On August 2H, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Fan rho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended denial by the adoption of Aeso lutlon No. 91-129 and also issued Resolution No. 91-12H, recommen di nq to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 91-D2B, Subarea 5, be denied. (iii) On November 20~, 1991, the City Council of the City of Fancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iv) All legal prerequisltea prior to the adoption of [his Resolution have occuried• a. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Ranche Cucamonga as followa: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Council durinn the above-referenced public heating on NovembeY 20, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as followa: (a) Subarea 3 of the application applies to approximately 30.72 acres of land, basically a 1lnear configuration, bordered on the northwn_st by the Ontazio (1-15) Freeway, on the east by East Avenue and existing taw Medium Reside n^_ial designated land, and on the south by Miller Avenue, as shown .,n ZSg CITY COUNCIL REBOLUT ION NO. ES PA 91-03, EVBAREA 3 - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Pd ge 2 Exhibit "A1," and is presently underdeveloped with three single family residences in the southwestern portion. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The property to the northwest of the subject site is designated freeway and is the Ontario (I-15) areaway. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and is underdeveloped with single family residences facing Miller Avenue and on the opposite side of East Avenue it is designated Office (OFC) in the City of Fontana's West End Specific Plan. The property to the south on the opposite side of Miller Avenue is designated Medium Residential and is vacant. na Worn Parfi ar, of ~.1,srak sir (c) This amendment~~may conflict with the Isnd Vse Policies of the General Plan and of the Eti wands Specific Plan and may not provide Eor development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and ~p.1N~Mn pae'NM of Sulm.rw43~ (d) This amendmentm may not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amendment wculd not be materially injurious oz detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties, but land use incompatibilities may result gar ~y,~. ~~{..,,~ ~yl~., d.f guVyY~3, 3. Based upon the subs tdntial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the spec if lc findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a1 That the properties located in /15ubarea 3 of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are inrnmpati.b le with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the northwest 6y the I-15 fre away r:3lFC ~pn4tl,a pa~' b fly- ~nla, j a...d, `1 (b) That the proposed amendmenty^would not have eignif ira nt impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions Si sted in Parts I and II of the Initial Environmental Study, but that land use incompatibilities may result; and (c) That the proposed amendmen w~tn OHM ~^ ~~~3~ the General Plan and the Etiwanda 5 ~ Hwy not be in conformance wiU pacific Plan due to the potential of establishing incompatible land use relationships with single family uses and significant vehicular traffic of the adjacent freeway ~ 'pegk ~. h. This Council hereby finds that the project has Seen reviewed am9 considered in compliance with the California Environmental Qua 11 ty Act ~f oweve r, this Council does not authorize the issuance of a Negative / Declaration A because the land use change may not promote the goals and objectives of the General Pian. .pe-~.(. ror'N.w'n f.+srlk.M ~ ~u~w...a. 3/ ZSq CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. ESPA 91-03, SVBAREA 3 - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that on the 20th day o£ August 1991, the City Council of the City of Pancho Cucamonga denies Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03 ,ySUbarea 3r as ~Oy~~sYt.enL-yA.'b:F"fl! M'13+*nY~~ bF 6. The City Clerk shad certify to the adoption of Ch is Resolution. C.~IJ -~ ~' u VL LM OP i ~t~e / S,'` ^//~ ~+~~ L. vL F ~,~ I L I-~ LM I i -7 ~I I ~ ~~ LM Eliwenda 9pecitio Plen Amendment 91-03 Foo1Ml1 Blvd. Specitie Ptn Atendrnents 91-02 LM - District Desipnslion ® PROPERTIES CURRENTLY OFSN:NATED Y~E~DNY >ortion RESMEXIIAL CR-14 D~EILIXC UNITS PEA AuiEl UXDER iOlOt ~ NY RESWENIALXATIDN ({-A DAELlIX6 UNITS PER ACAS) 1 ESPA Subarea Noe. •FSPA SuEeree No• r. w.ie. Rv9.Rel.Comm; ~~~omm. ', Regional RelXted~G4fi O,Comm.- ..... . + i ••••~~ ,. ••••'`••• SuDere~ m•nde Per els ' I~!cT;ESPA 91-03, FSPA 91-02 C 1'I-1' OF RA.ti'CHO CUCAMO:~iGA )').. ~,\1)1'(~i On~TS)O1 TITLE:SOeciLc plan Amend lacelion Mep - .G ~('y~ RESOLUTION NO. 9 ~. a ~~. A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COIR7C IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02H, SUBAREA 7, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (B-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) FOR APPAO%IMATELY 10.09 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH AND WEST BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, ON THE fiAST HY E%ISTING OFFICE OESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH HY BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAEING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-131-34 THROUGH 36, 52, ANO 53. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application far General Plan Amendment No. 91-02H act described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application.^ (ii) On August 2R, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearln9 on the application and recommended approval by the adoption of Resolution No. 91-63A. (iii) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iv) AL1 legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Recto lotion. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby epeclfical ly finds Ghat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Aeso lotion are true end correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral eteff reports, together with public testimony, this Councii hereby specifically finds a9 follows: (a) Subarea 7 of the application applies to approximately 10.09 acres of land, beaical ly a rectangular conf igurationr bordered on Che north and wear by Low Medium Residential designated land, on the east by existing Office deai grated land, and on the south by Beae Line Aoad as shown on Exhibit "A," and ig presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (B-14 dwelling units per acrell and Z~c Z CITY COUNCIL REBOLVT ION NO. GPA 91-028, SVBAREA 7 - CITY OF A.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Loa-Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential and is underdeveloped with a single family residence. The property to the east is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the south of Base Line Road is designated Medium Residential and is vacant. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Lend Use Element; and (e) This amendment aould not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substeniial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) Thet the properties located in Subarea 7 of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and surrounding land use designations as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the north and west by the same land use designation; and _ (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Environmental Study and that the proposed dealgnat ion would reduce the intensity of future residential development on the subject properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by promoting the retention of Etiwandn's rural atmosphere through reduced residential densities. 4. Th ie Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby authorizes the issuance of a Negative Dec ldYdLiOn• 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in pars gr aPhs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that on the 20th day of November 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves General Plan Amendment No. 91-02Br Subarea 7, amending the General Plan La n:1 Use Map from Medium Residential (R-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medi tm Residential (4-R dwelling units per acre) for approximately 10.09 acres ~.f land bordered on the north and west by existing Low Medium Resident'. al desl grated land, on the east by exis Ling Office designated land, and cn rh.~ south by Base Line Roed, as shown in Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Rescln^inn. Z ro 3 r cToR r s•ur S'uEE' _ - .% _ jr^hirfch' VL - L - VL -- ~ - _ L ~ ........--~--- f: ~. l r-1 yj M.Co ~~IIR-~~ ~ I 1 LM ~LM~ L}~ ~ ~ '~ Off. ~I Off. I `1 '~ l `fit •~ ~, Etlvantla ~raa GMaral plan .nrandmanla 9101 LM lane Uu Daaipnation ® MOPEAINS CUAAEATIT OESIENATEO Y[OON R SNIEN11Al 11-N OtELIIXO UMI15 P[[A A E UNOEA CONSIDEAAiIOM 011 A[DESICXAl~CX 10 LOA YEOIUY AESIDEN11Al (l-i OAEIIIND UNIiS PER ACAE ~ 1 ~ subnu Naa. a i v ~ ~ Ravi--- --~~~ CbTT. ~~ ~ _ OTT. Comm, --,-, ~ ~ ~-.-..4.r. Subam x amantlatl CITY' OF RA.1CH0 CUCAI~tOtiGA PLS.\SttiG DR'ISIO~; arem ~ LM - iTEN; GPA 91-028 __ (TITLE Ganaral elan Amantl. Lec Wen Map \ - E.\HIII(T •n• SCALE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 5, TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIVM RESIDENTIAL (H-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (d-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPRO%IMATELY 10.09 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH AND WEST BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL OESI GNATED LAND, ON THE EAST BY EXISTING OFFICE/PAOPESSI ONAL OESIGNATfiO LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH HY eASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-131-34 THROVGH 36, 52, AND 53. A. Re Cltela• (i) On July 6, 1983, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Regulatory Provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan through adoption of Ordinance No. 203. (ii) On March 16, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Ylan Amendment No. 91-03 ae described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On August 2H, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval by [he adoption of Resolution No. 91-64A and also issued Resolution No. 91-63A recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 91-028, Subarea 7, be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (v) A11 Legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. H. ordinance. The city council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby orda i~ ae follows: 1. This Council hereby sped Eical ly finds that all of the facts s~• Eoreh in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based cpon substantial evidence presented to this Council Au rimy the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including wr it can and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council he rehy specifically finds ae follows: (a) Subarea 5 of the application applies to approximately t0.0u acres of land, basically a rectangu laz ronf iqurat ion, bordered on the na rr^. and west by iow Medium Residential des!gnated land, nn the Best by exist ~, ~~,~ Office/Professional desi grated land, on the south by Base Line Aoad as sh~~w^. 'L~oS CITY COVNCIL ORDINANCE N0. EEPA 91-03, SUBAREA 5 - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 on Exhibit '•A1," and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units pez acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low Medium Residential and is underdeveloped with a single family residence. The property to the easC is designated Office/Professional and is vacant. '1Te property to the south of Base Line Road is designated Medium Residential and is vacant. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and Etiaanda Specific Plan and will provide For development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and ohjectives of the Land Vse Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially Injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a elgnif ieant Lmpact on the environment nor on the surrounding pzopert ies. 3. Based upon the subatantlal evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth Sn paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby Finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the properties located in Subarea 5 of the application are suitable Eor the urea permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and surrounding land use designations as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the north and west by the same land use designation; and (h) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Inl tlal Environmental Study and that the proposed desSgnetion would reduce the ineensity of future residential development on the subject properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan by promoting the retention of Etiwanda's rural atmosphere through reduced residential densities. 4. This council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, Eur they, this Commission hereby authorizes the issuance of a Negative Declaration. 2~~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ESPA 91-03, SUBAREA 5 - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby ordai na that on the 20th day of November 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea 5, amending the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Uae Map from Medium Residential (e-1d dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-e dwelling unite per acre) for approximately 10.09 acres of land bordered on the north and west by exi song Low Medium ReeidenClal designated land, on the east by existing office/Professional designated land, and on the south by Base Line Road, as shown in Exhibit "A 1.^ 6. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause [he same to be published within 15 days after ire peeeage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 2.b`~ VIC'ORIA SrAEE' - = VL ~ L _ V L -- ._ ~ r..--.. ..~-- .~ ~I L ~ --' LM Eliwende Spemlic Pbn Ammdmenb f/~OJ I---J~ f-~ O P i ~'+ t FoolDill Blvd. Specrlle Plen Amendmeme f1.02 LM - Dic Nicl Decipnalien ® MOPEAigS CUAAEXTIA DESICNAfED YEDANI UA ~SWE~A EA j_f IAUIDgtFR LILAC CDNSID[AATION OR AfDESICNAiICN (1 IDDtE~I IMC UNEi~ PERAACAEI 1 ESPA SuDere~ Noc i Q ~ fSPA SuDUO Noc W , ~_ _ = euo~.~ sorer.: CI1'~' OF RA,'VCHO CUCA.'vIO:VGA PLC-~~'-tiG DMSIOti oemele / I7E11~. ESPA 91-07, FSPA 91.02 TITLEspeeine Pi.n Am.na L r Mep ~ E.\HBR •A t• SCALE , Rrgionrl RNn~AI-ggmm~ RESOLUTION No. q,-~ , 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFOAN IA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-028, WEST PORTION OF SUBAREA 8, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND VSE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES OF LAND HORIIERED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST BY EAST AVENUE, ON THE SOVTN BY EXISTING OFFICE DESIGNATED LAND, ANO ON THE WEST BY EXISTING LOW-MEDIUM AESIDENTI AL DESIGNATED LAND - APN: 227-141-14 AND 66: AND DENYING THE EAST PORTION OF SUBAREA 8, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE WEST PORTION FOR APPRO%IMATELY 10.34 ACRES OF LANG BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOVTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST AND SOVTH BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, AND ON THE WEST BY EABT AVENUE - APN: 227-131-05, AND MAXING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recital9 (il The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-028 ea described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On August 28, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval for the west portion and denial for the east portion by adoption of Resolution No. 91-65A. (iii) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Ranchc Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the app Li cation. (iv) All legal prerequisites pr ioz to the adoption of ehis Resolutinn have xcutred. e. Rasa lut ion. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the C1 ty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby speci Eically finds that all of the Eacts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. eased upon subs tantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including wri t.[en and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically Einda as follows: 2lo~j CI'T'Y COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 91-028, SUBAREA 8 - CITY OF R•C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (aI Subarea B of the application applies to approximately 20.34 acres of land Mrdeted on the north by the Southern Pacific Railway, on the east 6y the Ontario (T-15) Freeway, on the south by existing office designated land and the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, and on the we3t by existing Low-Medium Residential designated land and divided in a north-south direction by East Avenue as shown on Exhibit "A," and is presently underdeveloped with two single Family residences. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (e-14 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the west is designated freeway and is developed with the Ontario (I-15) Freeway. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the south is designated Office and is vacant. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Vae Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, Dut land use incompatibilities may resulC on the east portion of Subarea a because the east area is adjacent to significant transportation fac ilitiea; and (d) This amendment does promote the goa19 and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) 'Phis amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properti ea and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties, but land use incompatibilities may result for the east portion of Subarea S. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon she specific findings cf facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and conclude, as follows: (a) That Che properties located in the west portion of Subarea 8 of the application are suitable for the uses Permitted in the proposed district and are compntlble with existing and surrounding land •sv designer ions as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the north end :rest by the same land use designation and that the properties in the east port inn are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district because the triangular site is bordered on three sides by sign if scent transpoctati~~n facilities; and (b7 That the proposed amendment would not have signs?ins n~ impacrs en the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenned by the findings and con clue ions listed in Porte I and II of the in iris' Environmental Study and that the proposed designation Eor the west portion •~' Subarea 8 would reduce the intensity of future residential development on ~ r subject properties; and aC l l~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. GPA 91-028, SUBAREA 8 - CITY OF A.C. November 20, 1991 Page 3 (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by promoting the retention of Etiwanda's rural atmosphere through reduced residential densities. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Qua llty Pct of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby authorires the issuance of a Negative Dec lazation. 5. Haled upon the findings and conclusions set forth .in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, thi9 Council hereby resolves that on the 20th day of November 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves General plan Amendment No. 91-028, weei portion of Subarea 8, amending the General Plan Land Uee Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-e dwelling units per acre) for approximately 10.00 acres of land end denies the land use change Eot the seat portion of Subarea S, es shown on Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. a, ~ y :'a r i'9l~ _ Ii.nlyon~ vL vL ==w L - ~' LM -, '_ r' yli~N.Cen) ice. , i ~~ i h LM 1LM 11 Ofl. I Off. ~b •~ ~w ~' Comm. M -.m~-__ ! .•'• t 'Comm~~ r ;' H.ComM.l % .~ -~ ~ Suba a 2 •man•« O On orb LM 1TE~1 GPA 91.028 CI'[Y OF RAtiCHO CUCA.110tiGA PL4\ VItiG DMSIO~ Z~ TTTLE G~mnl Plan Amand. Laeallen Map E.CHBIT •A• SCALE -- L -- . L ~ LM . ~ilaffi. Elirand• Araa Gananl Pbn Amandmanla 91~OYF LM Lsnd Uaa Daaipnavon OIf YiIT ® O S d N AfED YE E AESgENTIAI /-N OYELI!NC IiS PEA AEI UNA A A UN E S " ~ A A6NA ON YEAIUY ASIOEMi i0 10 A A II-1 OYFIIINC OMITS PE CREI !LM ! 1 ~ Subuu Nos. ~ •I m. ~'eAY. p~fk ORDINANCE NO. µ~~"F AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CLTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, WEST PORTION OF SUBAREA 6, TO AMEND THE ET IWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (9-id DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 10.00 ACRES OF LANG BORDERED ON THE NORTH HY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST BY EABT AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH BY IXISTING OFFICE DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE WEST BY EXISTING LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND - APN: 227-141-14 AND 66, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. ;i) On July 6, 1983, the Ciiy Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Regulatory Provis ions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan through the adoption of Ordinance No. 203. (iii On March 16, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03 ea deacr ibed in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to ae "the application." (iii) On August 28, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Poncho Cucamonga conducted a duly not Iced public hearing on the application and recommended approval of the west portion of Subarea 6 by adoption of Resolution No. 91-66A and also issued Reao lotion No. 91-65A recommending en the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 91-028, west portion of Subarea R, be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Poncho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that ell of the facts set Eorth in the Recitals, Part A, of Chia Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20r 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council he rehy specifically finds es follows: 2 ~3 CITY COVNCSL ORp INANCE NO• ESPA 91-n3, SVEAREA 6 - CITY OF R.C. November 2R, 1991 Page 2 (al Subarea 6 of the application applies to approximately 20.34 acres of land bordered on the north by the Southern Pacific Railway, nn the east by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the south by existing office/Professional designated land, and on the west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land as shown on Exhibit "A1," and is presently underdeveloped with two single family residences. Said properties are currently designated ae Medium Residential (5-14 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is dell grated Low Medium Residential and is vacant. The proper^_y to the west is designated freeway and is developed with the Ontario (I-16) Freeway. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the south is designated Office/Professional and is vacant. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Uae Policies of the General Plan and of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and will provide far development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, but land use incompatibilities may result on the east portion of Subarea 6 because this area 1s adjacent to significant transportation Eaci llti set and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be mate really injurious OF detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a 9l gn ificant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties, but land use incompatibilities may result for the east portion of Subarea 6. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Covncil during the above-referenced public hearing end upon Che specific findings of facie set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, th18 Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the properties located in the west portion of Saba rea 6 of the application era suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with exietin9 end surrounding land use des i9natione ea evidenced by the site's being bordered on the north and we_sC by the same land use designation; and (b) That the proposed amendment for the west portion of Subarea 6 would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding props rtie9 ae evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Environmental Study and that the proposed designation fir the west portion of Subarea 6 would reduce the intensity of future residential development nn the subject properties; and z~ y CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. E SPA 91-03, SUBAREA 6 - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 3 fc) That the proposed amendment for the west portion of Subarea 6 is in conformance with the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan by promoting the retention of Etiwanda's rural atmosphere through reduced residential densities. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby authorize9 the issuance of a Negative Declaration for the west portion of Subarea 6. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that on the 20th day of November 1991, the City Council of the CSty of Rancho Cucamonga approves Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03, west portion of Subarea 6, amending the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (5-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-B dwelling uni Ga pez acre) for approximately 10.00 acres of land as shown on Exhibit "A1." 6. The Mayor shall ei gn this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. "7 1 YI CiDAIA SiAEC' J L _ - - VL ~ _ VL ,,.~ %. ~----- L, LM ^.~ i i ~ / ~_-~'~~ I '-1 ~• I EAiw•nd• S••cilrt Plm yi/ Amenpnrml• 91-e1 ~ 1 i i '~,~ Femeill Blvd. SPeedle Pbn Anl•nplnem• fbOII LM LM ' LM Di•1Ne1 D••iyn•Ii•n I ® PAOP[ATIES CUAAENiIY OESNUTATED YEONN AESIDfMTIAI 11-11I{ DRLIINC CONSNfAATION E`OIIMREEpESICNAi!ON ~ J OP i0 lOt YFDIUY AESIOENTIAL OP i ~ ~~ LM (1-1 OtEIIINC UNIi~ PEA RCAF) \~ ~ ~ ESPA SuEuu Ne•. ,}\' a +\~ s O ~ FSPA SuE•r•• Ne• \ LM , -= . `•,` I AEg.HS1.Cemm~,~'~0~~ C.t~omm.l-i N~gional RNn• e•o•ree t~••1eMed e•re•b C17Y OF RAIYCNO CUCAMO;VGA (TE11'ESPA 91-03, FSPA 91.02 _ PL~XSIVG DMSiOti TmE'SP.mne Pl.e A e L 1 At.e ~; E.\HfOR 'At• SCALE RESOLUTT ON NO. (~J/.~ry. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE EAHT PORTION OF SUBAREA 6, OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND VSE MAP FROM MEDIUM (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM (6-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPRO%IMATELY 10.34 ACRES OP LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH HY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST AND SOUTH HY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREENAY, AND ON THE WEST BY EXISTING MEDIVM DESIGNATED LAND - APN: 227-131-05, AND NAILING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEHEOF A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has ES led an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03 as described Sn the title of this Rasa lotion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred io es "the application." (ii) On August 2E, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended denial of the east portion of Subarea 6 by the adoption of Resolution No. 91-66A and also issued ReaolulSon No. 91-65A recomalending to the City Council that the a99ociated General Plan Amendment No. 91-028, east portion of Subarea B, be denied. (iii) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iv) A11 legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resa lotion have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ae Eollowe: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution ere true and correct. 2. eased upon substantial evidence preeented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: f~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. ESPA 91-03, SVBAAEA 6 (EAST) - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (a) Subarea 6 of the application applies to approximately 20.34 acres of land bordered on the north Dy the Southern Pacific Railway, on the east by the Ontario (I-16) Freeway, on the south by existing Office/Professional designated land, and on the west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land as shown on Exhibit "A1," and is presently underdeveloped with two single family residences. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (9-/6 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the west is designated freeway and is developed with the Ontario (I-16) Freeway. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the south is designated Office/Professional and is vacant. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Vse Policies of the General Plan and of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and will provide for development, within the dlstr ict, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, but land use incompatlbi litl es may result on the east portion of Subarea 6 because this area is adjacent to signiElcant transportation facilities; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Vse Element; and (e7 This amendment would noG be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a si gnif icanh impact on the environment nor on the surrounding propert iea, but Land use incompati 6i lities may result for the east portion of Subarea 6. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific Findings of facts set forth in parngrapha 1 and 2 shover this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the properties located Sn the east portion of Subarea b are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district because the triangular site is bordered on three aides by si gnlEicant transportation facilities; and (b) That the proposed amendment for the east portion of subarea 6 may have impacts on the environment or on the surrounding propertiesi and (c) That the proposed amendment for the east portion of Subarea 6 may not be in conformance with the General Plan and the Etiwanda specific Plan due to potential land use conf ll ate. 4. This Council hereby finds theta tha project hea been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality pct of 1970 and, further, this does not authorize the issuance of a Negative Declera Linn for the east portion of Subarea 6. ~~g CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. ESPA 91-03, EURAREA 6 (EAST) - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Paqe 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that on the 20th day of November 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga denies Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03, east portion of Subarea 6, to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Ilse Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-e dwelling unite per acre) Eor approximately 10.34 acres of land as shown on Exhibit "A1." 6. The City Clerk shnll certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 1~ Y~:'OA'A 5'tE f' - - Vl ~ _ VL - L -• -~~ ..r LM ' ~ mm.#~ l ~ I ILM ~ •~ ,y~ ,fit ~~ LM L LM y ENwena• soecdw Phn Am.nain.m. n-oa Foelnill Eba. sPeeaie Pbn A~nena•nenU 11.02 LM - Oierrict Oefiyntlien ® MD/EATIES CUAACNTl1 OFSIGIATFD YEDAN ILINC UN TSEIE L ~ ND[ A A EJ U I CONSNHAAiION FOA AEDESIAMAt'ON i0 l0A YEDAIY AESIDENiIAI (PI DNEILIM UNIi~ AER ACAE) ~ ~ ~ ESPA riVllele• Noe i a ~ FSPA Su0u1• No• s v , -= - - ys L ew«1. ~I1wlna.a Pn11h ~I~' OF RANCHO CUCAMOIVGA I7E41;ESPA 9.1.09, FSPA 91.02 PL~X\9tiG DMSIOti T~E'gP~1•rh Pl.e Ani • Le M.y ~ i E~HIBfi •AR• SC.aLE Regional q~l~bd•iigyrm~~ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03 i,xx x yr ne+:v~nv u~i.nrvx~iv trx STAFF REPORT a DATE: November 20, 1991 T0: Mayot and Members of the City Council JeCk Lam, AICP, City Manager PROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Vince Bertoni, Aasl9tant Planner SoBJECT: ENVI RONMBNTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 - CITY OP BANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plm Land Uae Map within the Victoria Planned Community an described below: 1. FYOm Medium Bigh Residential 114-24 dwelling unite per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwe llinq unite per acre for the following subareas: A. Por 10.0 acres of send located on the northeast corner of Base Line Rond and Milliken Avenue. The Planning Comieeion recd®enda approval - APN: Portion of 227-691-01. B. Por 79.3 acres of land located on the north aide of ease Line Aoad, west of Victoria Park Lane, and east of the AV self storage facility. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APH: 227-091-14 and 75. C. Por 21.77 acres of land located on the northwest Corner of Base Line Road and the faiure Day Creek eoulevazd. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: Portion of 227-091-18 and 19, 227-091-20 through 22, and 227-091-63. D. Por 7.895 scree of land located between approximately 1, D00 feet and 1,300 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west aide of the future Dny Creek Bou leverd. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The City Council will Also consider Low Medium Residential (d-e dwelling uni to per acre) as an alternetl ve land use designation for the preceding four subareas. 2. From Medium Resident iel (8-14 dwel ling unite per acre) to Loa Medium Residential (d-e dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: B. Por 10.1 scree of land Located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue south of the southern Pacific Railroad. The Planning Commission recommends dental - APN: Portion of 227-691-01. 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 91-03 6 VPCA 91-03 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 20, 1991 Page 2 F. For 18 acres of land located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue beMeen Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: 227-071-17. G. For 11.87 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Renyon Nay and Woodruff Platt. The Planning Coamission recommends approval - APN: 227-011-26. H. For 23.03 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Victoria Pazk Lane and Rochester Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: 227-091-51. I. Por 32.14 scree of land located on the northeast corner of Hase Line Rond and Rochester Avenue. The Planning Comoiisaion recommends approval - AFN: 227-091-45 end 46 and a portion of 227-091-44. J. Por 20.895 acres of land approximately 892 feet north of the future Victoria Pazk Lane extension on ehc weer sSde of the Future Day Creek sou levard. The Planning Co®Ssaian recommends approval - APN: portion of 227-021-D3 and 13. R. For 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 892 feet and 1,200 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lene extension on the west aide of the future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends dental - APN: ]brtlon of 227-021-03 and 13. The City Council will also consider Low Realdential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative land use designation for the preceding seven subareas. 3. From Medium Nigh Realdential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Civic/CO~unlty for the following subarea; L. Por 2.46 acres of land approximately 406 feet south of the Southern Peclfic Railroad right-oE- way and approximately 321 feet west of the Future Day Creek Boulevard. Tha Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: Portion of 227-091-18 and 19. d. Prom Medium Hi qh Realdential (14-24 dwelling uni to per acre) to Neighborhood Coomiercial for the following subarea: M. For 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 600 feet end 1,000 feet south of Hi qh land Avenue on the west aide of the fueu re Day Creek Bou levezd. The P1ennSn9 Commission recommends approval - APN+ Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. a Q3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF RHPOAT GPA 91-03 6 VPCA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 20, 1991 Page 3 The City Council will also Iona ider Medium Ae si dential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for the preceding subarea. Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration For the entire application. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VIC'MRIA PLANNW COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plen Land Uee Map within the Victoria Planned Community ae described below: 1. From Medium Aigh Residential (td-24 dwelling unite per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre Eor the following subareas: A. For 10.0 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Hase Line Road and Ml lliken Avenue. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: Portion Of 227-691-01. B. For 19.3 acres of land located on the north aide of Baee Line Road, west of Vi eto[ia Park Lane, and east of the RV self storage facility. The Planning Co®Ssaion recommends approval - APN: 227-091-14 and 15. C. For 21.77 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and the future Day Creek sou levard. The Planning Co®ieaion tecoomenda approval - APN: Portion of 227-091-18 and 19, 227-091-20 through 22, and 227-091-43. D. Por 7.895 scree of land located between approximately 1,000 Eeet end 1,300 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west aide of the future Day Cteek Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The city Council will also tronaider Low Medium Residential (d-B dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative land use dealgnatlon for the preceding foot subareas. 2. Prom Medium R081dential (8-14 dwelling units peY acre) to Low Medium Residential (d-e dwe llin9 units per acre) for the following subareas: E. For 10.1 acres of land located on the east side of Milliken Avenue south of [he Southern Pacific Railroad. The Planning conmiiealon recommends denial - APN: Portion of 227-691-01. F. For 18 scree of land located on the east side of Milliken Avenue between Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way. The Plann Sng Comaieaion recommends approval - APN: 227-011-17. ~-~y CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 91-03 fi VPCA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 20, 1991 Page 4 G. Por 11.07 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Woodruff Places. The Planning Commission recommends approval - APN: 227-011-26. H. Por 23.03 acres of land located on Che southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue. The Planning Commission [eco®enda approval - APN: 227-091-61. Z. For 32.14 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Ease Line Road and Rochester Avenue. The Planning Co:mie alon reco®ende approvel - APN: 227-091-46 and 46 and a portion of 227-091-44. J. For 20.095 acres of land approximately 892 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lane extension on the weal 91fle of the future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Co®SSSion recommends approval - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. R. Por 7.095 acres of land located between approximately 892 feet and 1,200 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lane extension on the west aide of Che future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Commieaian recoamande denial - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The City Council will also consider Low Residential 12-4 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative land use deaigneLLon for the preceding seven subareas. 3. From Medium High Residential (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) to Community Fnci lilies for the following subarea: L. For 2.46 acres of lend approximately 406 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of- way and approximately 321 feet west of the future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Camiieeion recommends approval - APN: Portion of 227-091-10 end 19. 4. From Medium High Realdentlel (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) to Village Commercial for the following subarea: M. Por 7.095 acres of land located between approximately 600 feet and 1,000 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west aide of the future Day Creek Boulevard. The Planning Comnleaion recommends approvel - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The City Council will also wnaider Medium Residential (e-14 dwelling unites per acre) as an alternative land use deal gnation for the preceding subarea. The Planning Covmleeion recomrenda issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. 28S CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 91-03 S VPCA 91-03 - CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 20, 1991 Page 5 RBCOMDa7DASTa7: The Planning Commission makes the following recommendations to the City Council: SuhaYea A: Approval of Medium Residential Subarea B: Approval of Medium Residential Subarea C: Approval of Medium Residential Subarea D: Approval of Medium Residential Subarea E; Denial (Retain Medium Residential) Subarea Fs Approval of Low-Medium Residential 5u bar ea G; Approval of Low-Medium Residential Subarea H: Approval of Low-Medium Residential Subarea I: Approval of Low-Medium Reeidentia: Subarea J: Approval of Low-Medium Residential Subarea R: Denial (Retain Medium Residential) Subarea L: Approval of Civic/Community Subarea M: Approval of Nei ghborhood Commercial HACIOGg00l® AMD AMAL1<SIS: The aubj act amendments are a rasa It of City Council direction for the Planning Commission to develop recommendations to reduce the community's amount of vacant multiple family land and to reduce the den aity allowed on that land using the City's Formal amendment process for the General Plan, Deyelopmant Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Victoria Planned Community. The Council's goal was to ensure, at Che time of the City's build-out, that multlp le family dwelling unite comprise no more than 31 to 35 percent of the City's total dwelling unit rnunt. The Council directed the Planning Comali asion to investigate all vacant, uncommitted multiple family land for potential land use changes m tingle family, lower density multiple family, and other non-residential designations which may be appropriate on a site-by-site Daeis. At their October 9r 1991 meeting, the Planning Commission made the above-described recommendations to the City Councl 1. The Planning Cowniseion concurred with staff's taco®enda lions in eacD cats except for Subarea E. It was the Co~iasion's opinion that due to the proximity to the central park on the northwest corner of Ease Line Roed and Mi111k en Avenue, the shopping center under construction on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, and two busy 6treees (Ease Line Road and Ml ll iken Avenue 1, Subarea E should remain Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per ac[e ). This recommendation would create one 20.1 acre parcel deai 9nated Medium Residential, instead of dividing the ai to between two designs done as 1t Ss currently configured. One commiasi oner disagreed with the redeslgnation of Subarea A to Medium Residential because of the current proposal for a multiple family development on the subject Bite. Another Commissioner disagreed with the retention of Medium Reei dential for Subarea E with the opinion that Low-Medium would be an appropriate use foz the Subarea and that the project may have already been approved if the developer had been willing to make the changes abet the Commission requested. ~.p W CITY COUNCIL BTAFF REPORT GPA 91-03 6 VPCA 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 20, 1991 Page 6 The Commission also had a split vote on Subareas F and G. Two Cori ssioners disagreed with the majority remmvendation of Low-Medium Residential because the sites are bordered by two major thoroughfares ~Nighland and Milliken Avenues), close to commercial development, adjacent to a park, and are buffered from adjacent single family houses by paeeos. Two Covmisaioners also di ea greed with the majority recommendation of Medium Residential for Subarea B. The Co®SSaionera believed that the adjacent conditions of the RV self storage facility to the west, the commercial shopping center to the east, and the condominiums to the east, warrant leaving the parcels at Medium-High Residential. Also, one Commissioner disagreed with the majority recosmendation of Low-Medium Residential for Subarea J indicated it would be better to master plan Subareas J and Ras one large pzojeci. The property owners in Sabarese A, 6, F, and G are currently processing apolicatione with the City Eor aultiple family residential developments. For further information, please refer to the Planning Commission staff report and minutes from October 9, 1991. CORRESPO[IDRICR: These items have been advertised ae pubic heeringe in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been eenC to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site and to ell property owners within an expanded notification area. Respe Plly aubm tied, r Brad B er City P annex BB:VB: mlg Attachments: Planning Cosmieaion Staff Report of October 9, 1991 Planning Co®rea ion Minutee of October 9, 1991 GPA 91-03, Subaree A, Aeeolution of Approval VPG 91-03, Subarea A, Ordinance GPA 91-03, Subarea B, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, SuWrea B, Ordinance GPA 91-03, Subarea C, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea C, ordinance GPA 91-03, Subarea D, Reeolutlon of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea D, Ordlnence GPA 91-03, Subarea E, Aeeolution of Denial VPCA 91-03, subarea E, Reeolutlon of Denial GPA 91-03, Subarea F, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea F, Ordinance 28Z CITY COUNCIL STAPP REPORT GPA 91-03 6 VPG 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUGMONGA November 20, 1991 Page 7 GPA 91-03, Subarea G, Resolution of Approval VPG 91-03, Subarea G, Ordinance GPA 91-63, Subarea H, Resolution of Approval VPG 91-03, Subarea H, Ordinance GPA 91-03, Subarea I, Resolution of Approval VPG 91-03, Subarea I, Ordinance GPA 91-03, Subarea J, Resolution of Approval VPG 91-03, Subarea J, Ordinance GPA 91-03, Subarea )<, Resolution of Denial VPG 91-03, Subarea R, Resolution Of Dental GPA 91-03, Subarea L, Resolution OE Approval VCPA 91-03, Subarea L, Ordinance GPA 91-D3, Subarea N, Resolution of Approval VPG 91-03, Subarea M, Ordinance 2$~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r.` DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 9, 1991 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Vince Bertoni, Assistant Planner 03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Map within the Victoria Planned Community as described below: 1. From Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 10.0 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: Portion of 227-691-01. B. For 19.3 acres of land located on the north side of Base Line Road, west of Victoria Park Lane, and east of the recreational vehicle self storage facility - APN: 227-091-14 and 15. C. For 21.77 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-091-18 and 19, 227-091-20 through 22, and 227-091-43. D. Far 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west side of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The Planning commission will also consider Low- Medium Residential (4-e dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land uae designation for the preceding four subareas. 2. From Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: E. For 10.1 acres of lend located on the east side of Milliken Avenue south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-o£-way - APN: Portion of 227-691-01. F. For 18.0 acres of land located on the east side of Milliken Avenue between Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way - APN: 227-011-17. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M October 9, 1991 Page 2 G. For 11.87 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Woodruff Place - APN: 227-011-26. H. For 23.03 acres oP land located on the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-091-51. I. For 32.14 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-091-45 and 46 and a portion of 227-091-44. J. For 20.895 acres of land approximately 892 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lane extension on the west side of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. K. For 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 892 feet and 1,200 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lane extension and on the west side of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for the preceding seven subareas. 3. From Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Civic/Community for the following subarea: L. For 2.46 acres of land approximately 406 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right- of-way and approximately 321 Peet west of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-091-18 and 19. 4. From Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Neighborhood Commercial for the following subarea: M. For 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 600 feet and 1,000 feet south of Highland Avenue and on the west side of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The Planning Commission will also consider Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for the preceding subarea. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. aao PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M October 9, 1991 Page 3 AMENDMENT 91 03 C TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Victoria Planned Community Land Use Map as described below: 1. From Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: A. For 10.0 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Base Line. Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: Portion of 227-691-01. B. For 19.3 acres of land located on the north side of ease Line Road, west of Victoria Park Lane, and east of the recreational vehicle self storage facility - APN: 227-091-14 and 15. c. For 21.77 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-091-18 and 19, 227-091-20 through 22, and 227-091-43. D. For 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet south o£ Highland Avenue, on the west aide of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The Planning Commission will also consider Low- Medium Residential {4-8 dwelling units Per acre) as an alternative land use designation for the preceding four subareas. 2. From Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-e dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas: E. for 10.1 acres of land located on the east side of Milliken Avenve south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way - APN: Portion of 227-691-01. F. For 18.0 acres of land located on the east side of Milliken Avenue between Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way - APN: 227-011-17. G. For 11.87 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Woodruff Place - APN: 227-011-26. H. For 23.03 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-091-51. I. For 32.14 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-091-45 and 46 and a portion of 227-091-44. J. For 20.895 scree Of land approximately 892 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lane extension on the west side of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-0' and 13. '1 A I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M October 9, 1991 Page 4 K. For 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 892 feet and 1,200 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lane extension and on the west side of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Residential. (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for the preceding seven subareas. 3. From Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Community Facilities for the following subarea: L. For 2.46 acres of land approximately 406 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right- of-way and approximately 321 feet west of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-091-18 and 19. 4. From Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling unlts per acre) to Village Commercial for the following subarea: M. For 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 600 feet and 1,000 feet south of Highland Avenue and on the west side of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The Planning Commission will also consider Medium Residential (8-L4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for the preceding subarea. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. ACTION-- REOUE~ED; Approval of a General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned Community Amendment, divided into 13 subareas, and issuance of a negative declaration. SITE CHARACTERISTZC~: The subject sites exist primarily as a gradual incline in a southerly direction with an average natural slope of less than five percent. Alluvial fan deposits, which are materials deposited by streams draining from the mountains, are found throughout the subject properties. Vineyards have replaced the native vegetation, however, the vineyards have been abandoned and native vegetation is establishing itself again. The most common vegetation found on the subject sites includes California buckwheat, scrub oak, and hirsute. The subject sites are currently vacant with the exception of Subarea °I" which is developed with an existing, nonconforming lumber yard. BACKGROUND: The City Council held public workshops on August 9, 1990, and January 31, 1991, regarding multiple family housing development in the City. These workshops were the result of citizens' concerns relating to the increase in multiple family dwelling unit developments and the decrease in single family 2a Z PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M October 9, 1991 Page 5 dwelling unit developments which is gradually changing the community's residential character. City staff reviewed the status of multiple family housing prior to the workshops. Using various scenarios, staff identified the effects on City revenues and services if undeveloped multiple family land were rezoned to single family or to lower density multiple family designations. During the workshops, citizens and City Council members expressed concern over increased traffic volumes, increased demands on City services, and overcrowded conditions in local schools which were all perceived to be linked to the increase in multiple family dwelling unit development. The Council determined that a reduction in the anticipated total housing unit count would lessen the negative effects of residential growth on the community. As a result of the workshops, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to develop recommendations to reduce the community's amount of vacant multiple family land and to reduce the density allowed on that land using the City's formal amendment process for the General Plan, Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and Victoria Planned community. The Council's goal was to ensure, at the time of the City's build-out, that multiple family dwelling units comprise no more than 32 to 35 percent of the City's total dwelling unit count. The Council directed the Planning Commission to investigate all vacant, uncommitted multiple family land for potential land use changes to single family, lower density multiple family, and other nonresidential designations which may be appropriate on a site-by-site basis. The Planning Commission and City Council have previously reviewed land use designations in the Etiwanda area for density reductions and the Council has redesignated 106.16 acres of undeveloped multiple family designated land. This includes 87.52 acres of land in the Etiwanda Specific Plan changed from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential, 17.14 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan changed from Medium Residential (a-14 dwelling units per acre) to Community Commercial, and 1.5 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan changed from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Commercial Office. The application to redesignate the remaining 100.13 acres of undeveloped multiple family land in the Etiwanda Specific Plan is pending before the City Council. On September 10, 1991, staff conducted a neighborhood meeting with the affected property owners and with the interested property owners in the vicinity. Notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject sites and to all property owners within an expanded notification area. In addition, an advertisement was placed in the Victoria Planned Community's Active Bulletin. The intent of the meeting was to 29?~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M October 9, 1991 Page 6 give interested property owners and residents the opportunity to ask questions of staff regarding the proposed amendments. The majority of those who attended the meeting expressed support for the staff recommendations as outlined in this report. ANALYSIS• General Issues - A review of issues which apply to all subareas within the application and a review of the cumulative effects of the proposed land use amendments: 1. $esidential Land Use=: Staff analysis prior to the workshops assumed that the land use amendments would stay within residential land use categories. it was anticipated that the least amount oP land use conflicts would result from this approach. Therefore, staffs initial evaluation of land use amendments assumed a change from the subject sites existing density range to the next lower density range. Upon further analysis, taking into consideration site constraints and public improvement projects, staff also included consideration of Commercial and Civic/Community land use designations. 2. Housing: Victoria Planned Co unity: The effects of the land use amendments on the anticipated number of dwelling units remaining to be built in the Victoria Planned community are as follows: 1) The current land use designations would allow for 2,E53 multiple family dwelling units to be built on the subject sites given development at 62 percent of the density range. If approval is given to the staff recommendations for land use amendments, then only 1,536 dwelling unite would be built given development at 62 percent of the density range; and only 784 of those dwelling units would be built within multiple family land use designations. This is a reduction of 2,069 multiple family dwelling units and an increase of 751 single family dwelling units which would represent a net reduction of 1,310 total dwelling units (net total dwelling units equals the decrease in multiple family dwelling unite minus the increase in single family dwelling units). 2) The proposed amendments would change the current housing unit ratio at build-out in the Victoria Planned Community from 52 percent single family and 49 percent multiple family to 74 percent single family and 26 percent multiple Pemily. say PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M October 9, 1991 Page 7 Citv: The effects of the proposed land use amendments on City housing policies are as follows: 1) The dwelling unit reductions should not conflict with any specific policies, goals, or objectives of the General Plan Housing Element. The Housing Element provides for programs which aid in the development and improvement of the City's housing stock. The dwelling units required by those programs which list spec if i.c numbers of dwelling units to be built or to be aided would be included within the remaining units expected to be built under the amended dwelling unit totals. Reductions in the total number of dwelling units at the build-out date will result in greater portions of low and very low income units, program-aided units, etc., within the remaining total of units yet to be developed and within applicable program goals. 2) The unit reductions would bring the anticipated total of dwelling units to within approximately 94 percent of the total identified in the SLAG Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) to be built by 1994. Also, the reductions would still fulfill approximately 76 percent of the very low, low, and moderate dwelling unit requirements for the same period. 3) The revised total of approximately 10,000 dwelling unite conforms with the Housing Element's anticipated range of dwelling units proposed for development for the period up to 1994 (Program 3.A. 1). Subarea Analvsis - A review of the subarea recommendations, alternatives, and site-specific issues relating to each proposed amendment are detailed at the end of the staff report. CUMULATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Part I and Part II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan and Victoria Planned Community amendments. The issue for consideration is a reduction of proposed land use intensity; therefore, staff believes the impact of development should not be more significant than originally described in the 2q s PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M October 9, 1991 Page 8 environmental review of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community. Further, the reduction in potential future housing units does not affect the city's ability to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan Housing Element. CORRESPONDENCE: The Planning Division has received letters in opposition to the proposed land use changes from the affected property owners. The Planning Division has also received letters in support of the proposed land use changes from interested residents in close proximity to the affected properties. These items have been advertised as public hearings in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site and to all property owners within an expanded notification area. Resp 11 bm' ted, Brad le City anner Attachments: Subarea Analysis Exhibit "A" - General Plan Amendment Location Exhibit "B" - Letter from Eda Ellana Exhibit "C" - Letter from Mr. and Mre. Douglas Exhibit "D" - Letter from Erwin Cross, Sr. Exhibit "E" - Letter from Paul and Susan Kim Exhibit "F" - Letter from R. Scot Sellars of Lincoln Properties GPA 91-03, Subarea A, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea A, Resolution of Approval GPA 91-03, Subarea B, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea B, Resolution of Approval GPA 91-03, Subarea C, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea C, Resolution of Approval GPA 91-03, Subarea D, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea D, Resolution of Approval GPA 91-03, Subarea E, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea E, Resolution of Approval GPA 91-03, Subarea F, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea F, Resolution of Approval GPA 91-03, Subarea G, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea G, Resolution of Approval GPA 91-03, Subarea H, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-U3, Subarea H, Resolution of Approval GPA 91-07, Subarea I, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea I, Resolution of Approval Map Watt Z l~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M October 9, 1991 Page 9 GpA 91-03, Subarea J, Resolution oP Approval VPCA~91-03, Subarea J, Resolution of Approval GPA 91-03, Subarea K, Resolution of Denial VPCA 91-03, Subarea K, Resolution of Danial GPA 91-03, Subarea L, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03r Subarea L, Resolution oP Approval GPA 91-03, Subarea M, Resolution of Approval VPCA 91-03, Subarea M, Resolution of Approval 29 l APPLICAt10N SUBAREAS 2qg GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 2 eUBARBA A 1. PROTECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: ~~ l L i E LY ( Vw~ ~ ~ f` awe LN». AL Surroundinc Land Use and toninc: North - Undeveloped, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre proposed for Low-Medium Residential (4-e dwelling units per acre) South - Commercial shopping center under construction, Neighborhood Commercial in the Tarra Vista Community Plan East -Single family residences under construction, Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Park b. r neral Plan Designations: Project Sita - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acres proposed for Low-Medium Residential (4-e dwelling units per acre) South - Neighborhood Commercial East - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling unit6 per acre) West -Park LAND USE ANAL}LSS_S: a. Backoround: An application on the subject site for 328 condominiums on 20.15 acres of land (including Subarea E to the north) was denied by the Planning Commission on November 28, 1990, and was denied by the City Council on January 16, 1991, on an appeal by the applicant. For the purposes of the multiple family residential study, this denial placed the subject property in the vacant, uncommitted land category. The property owners are currently going through preliminary discussions with City staff regarding a new project for the subject site. The proposed project would include 264 multiple family dwelling units on 15.09 acres of land (17.49 dwelling units per acre) and would reserve 5 acres of land for future development. b. Analvsis of Proposed Medium Residential Desicnation: This subarea is located on tha northwest corner of two major arterials, Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. Also, the Central Park is proposed to the west of the subject site. This condition may result in noise impacts from the two major arterials and impacts from the recreational uses at the park. Therefore, this location zqq GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 3 may be appropriate for a multiple family land use designation such as Medium Residential. In addition, the properties to the east of the subject site are designated Low-Medium Residential an3 a Medium Residential designation could act as a buffer between the intersection and the single family homes. It is staff's opinion that the Medium Residential designation could provide for a more appropriate transition than Medium- High Residential from the single family neighborhood to the east and the intersection to the west. The redesignation of the subject site from Medium-High Residential to Medium Residential would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned community. c. Analysis of Alterna e D sicnat' Low-Medium Residentlal was reviewed as an alternative to the existing Medium-High Residential designation and proposed Medium Residential designation. Tha Low-Medium designation would provide a continuation of the land use designations to the east. The Low-Medium Residential designation would provide continuation of the land use designation to the east, however, the intersection of Milliken and Base Line Road, combined with the proposed Central Park to the east and the commercial shopping center under construction to the south, could create an area with visual and noise impacts which may not be compatible with the Low-Medium designation. ENVIRONMENTAL A ccurwNm; Staff has completed Parts I and II of the Initial Study and has found no aignif scant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned community Amendment. FACTS FOR FINDINGC; Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. c. The properties located in Subarea A of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed 300 GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 4 district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the location of properties with lower density land use designations bordering the subject site to the east. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 91- 03, Subarea A, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 03, Subarea A, to the City Council through the adoption of attached resolutions. 3 0~ GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 5 BIIBAR811 B 1. pRO.IECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Surround'n an se and on' North - Single family residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Industrial building used to produce Wine vinegar, High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) East -Condominiums under construction and an existing commercial shopping center, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Village Commercial West -Recreational vehicle self storage facility b. General Plan Desicnations: Project Site - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) East -Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Neighborhood Commercial West -Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre LAND USE ANALYSIS: Analysis of Proposed Medi Rr 'd ntial Desicnation: This subarea is located between Base Line Road, which is a major arterial, and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, which may be used in the future as a commuter rail line. In addition, there are condominiums under construction to the northeast, at a density of 16 dwelling units to an acre, and there is also a Village Commercial designation to the southeast. These conditions may cause noise and traffic impacts which may not be compatible with single family residential development. It is staffs opinion that a Medium Residential designation would be compatible with the surrounding land uses and that a multiple family designation would appear to be the most appropriate use. The redesignation of the subject site from Medium-Nigh Residential to Medium Residential would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community. b. Analysis of Alternat+~= Deaicnation• Low-Medium Residential was reviewed as an alternative to the existing Medium-High Residential designation and the 3oZ GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 6 proposed Medium Residential designation. Low-Medium would be .consistent with the existing single family residential neighborhood to the north of the subject site, however, the site conditions surrounding the property may not make Low-Medium Residential the most appropriate land use designation. x'NVIRONMFNTAT A caw h Staff has completed Parts I and II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned Community Amendment. FACTS FOR FINDIN-c: Based on the Pacts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Lanfl Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. ~. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. c. The properties located in Subarea B of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the location of properties with lower density land use designations bordering the subject site to the north. 5. RECOFPIENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 91- 03, Subarea B, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 03, Subarea B, to the City Council through the adoption of attached resolutions. 303 GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, :991 Page 7 BDBAREA C 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPT ON: a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, Regional Related Office/Commercial East - Vacant, Utility Corridor West -Plant Storage, Utility corridor b. General Plan D ~' Project Site - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Commercial East - Flood Control/Utility Corridor West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor 2. LAND 5 NA Y Ic• a. Backargund: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has rscently purchased the properties in this subarea with Redevelopment Agency Set Aside Funds. b. Analvsis oP Proposed Med'Lm Residen ial D signs The subject site is on the north side of a major arterial and is on the west side of a future major arterial. In addition, the site is on the south side of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way which may be used in the future as a commuter rail line. These conditions, may cause noise and traffic impacts to occur on the subject site. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that a multiple family residential designation would be the most appropriate designation for the subject site. Ths redesignation of the subject site from Medium-High Residential to Medium Residential would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned community. c. Analysis of Alternative Designation; Low-Medium Residential was considered as an alternative to the existing Medium-High Residential designation and the proposed Medium Residential designation. Zt is staff s opinion that the site conditions listed above would make this site inappropriate for single family residences as allowed in the Low-Medium designation. ~Ol{ GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 8 d, A t is of a Mixed Use Designation: Staff analyzed a mixed use designation as an alternative land use designation. Due to the subject sites location near a potential commuter rail station and its potential to combine that use with residential and office or commercial uses, mixed use may be an appropriate designation. However, the Victoria Planned Community does not have any mixed use zoning designations or development standards. Tha only mixed use zoning in the City is within the Foothill Boulevard Spacif is Plan although there are no development standards in the plan. Therefore, if the Planning Commission decides that a mixed use zoning is most appropriate, then a text amendment in addition to a land use amendment would need to be approved by the Commission. In that case, staff would recommend that the application for the subject site be continued so that staff could develop uses and standards for the mixed use designation. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Parts I and II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned community Amendment. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. c. The properties located in Subarea C of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the location of properties with lower density land use designations bordering the subject site to the north. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 91- 03, Subarea C, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 03, Subarea C, to the City Council through the adoption of attached resolutions. 30 5- GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 9 BDBAAEA D 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Surroundinc Land Use and zoning: North - Vacant, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, Medium Residential (e-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre )~ proposed for Neighborhood Commercial West - Vacant, Utility Corridor b. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium-High Residential (14-za dwelling units per acre) North - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) 5ast -Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre); proposed for Village Commercial West -Flood Control/Utility Corridor 2. LAND USE ANALYSIS: a. Analvs is of Proposed Med'vm Residential Designation: The subject site is south of an existing Medium-High Residential land use designation that is proposed to be redesignated to Neighborhood Commercial. In addition, the property to the north of the proposed Neighborhood Commercial is also designated Neighborhood Commercial. It is staff's opinion that a multiple family land use designation would be most appropriate for the subject site given the noise and traffic impacts that may be caused by the existing and proposed coaunercial designations to the north and the proposed major arterial, Day Creek Boulevard, to the east. The redesignation of the subject site from Medium-Nigh Residential to Medium Residential would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned community. b• Asa lysis of Alternative Desicna ian: Low-Medium Residential was considered as an alternative land use designation. However, upon consideration of the impacts that the commercial uses and the future Day Creek Boulevard would have upon the subject site, it is staff's 3~c~ GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 10 opinion that single family residences would not be an appropriate land use. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Parts I and II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned community Amendment. 4. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. c. The properties located in Subarea D of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations ae evidenced by the location of properties with the same land use designations south of the subject site. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 91- 03, Subarea D, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 03, Subarea D, to the City Council through the adoption of attached resolutions. 30~ GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 11 BDBARFa a PROJECT AND SITE DF CRIPTION: a, Surrounding Land Use and 2onina: t LY '> E lr v.a < r ~ lr, e... lw. ea Nozth - Single family residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre); proposed for Medium Residential (5-14 dwelling units per acre) East -Single family residences under construction, Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Park b. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (e-la dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre); proposed for Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East -Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Park LnND USE ANALYSIS: b. BacKground: An application on the subject site for 328 condominiums on 20.15 acres of land (including Subarea A to the south) was denied by the Planning Commission on November 28, 1990, and was denied by the City Council on January 16, 1991, on an appeal by the applicant. For the purposes of the multiple family residential study, this denial placed the subject property in the vacant, uncommitted land category. The property owners are currently going through preliminary discussions with City staff regarding a new project for the subject site. The proposed project would include 264 multiple family dwelling units on 15.09 acres of land (17.49 dwelling units per acre) and would reserve five acres of land for future development. The subject site is west of existing properties designated Low-Medium Residential and this proposal would extend that land use to Milliken Avenue. It is staff's opinion that the Low-Medium designation could act as a transition between the proposed Medium Residential designation to the south and the existing Low Residential designation to the north. ~O GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 12 The redesignation of the subject site from Medium Residential to Low-Medium Residential would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community. c. Analvsis of Alternative Desicnation: Low Residential Was considered as an alternative to the existing Medium Residential and proposed Low-Medium designations. Low Residential, allowing 2-4 dwelling units per acre, is much lower in intensity than the proposed Medium Residential to the south which allows for 8-14 dwelling units per acre. Also, the Low Residential development standards do not allow for innovative standards such as "zero lot line" and "wide-shallow" products that are allowed in the Low-Medium Residential designations which could provide for an appropriate transition between the proposed Medium Residential to the south and the existing Low Residential to the north. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low Residential would not be as compatible with the surrounding land uses as would LoW Medium Residential. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Parts I and II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned Community Amendment. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Cammission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties located in Subarea E of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the location of properties with lower density land use designations bordering the subject site to the north and properties with the same land use designation to the east. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 91- 03, Subarea E, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 3o~j GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 13 03, Subarea E, to the City Council through the adoption of attached resolutions. 3l0 GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS Dctober 9, 1991 Page la BUBAREA F 1, RRn TF AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a, sur ounding rand Use and Zonina: N~aM.nO ~v.. North - Commercial shopping center under construction, village Commercial South - Single family residences, Low-Medium Residential (a-6 dwelling units per acre) East -Single family residences and vacant land, Low- Medium Residential (4-E dwelling units per acre) and Park West -Single family residences, Low-Medium Residential (a-8 dwelling units per acre) b. General Plan Designations: Project site - Medium Residential (e-la dwelling units per acre) North - Neighborhood Commercial South - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East -Low-Medium Residential (a-s dwelling units per acre) and Park West -Low-Medium Residential (4-e dwelling units per acre) 2. ~auD USE ANAL PSIS: a. Bac ground: An application was submitted to the Planning Division on May 2, 1990, for a residential subdivision of 95 single family lots on 18 acres of land with an average lot size of 6,091 square feet. The project was withdrawn by the applicant on December 10, 1990. Another application was submitted to the Planning Division on April 10, 1991, for a residential subdivision and design review of 193 multiple family dwelling units on 18 acres of land (1D.7 dwelling units per acre). The application is currently under rev law by staff and has not received Planning Commission approval. The earliest possible dais the current application could receive a Planning Comm isa ion public hearing is November 13, 1991. For the purposes of the multiple family residential study, the withdrawal of the first application and the lack of Planning Commission approval on the second application placed the subject property in the vacant, uncommitted land category. b. Blld lvsis of Proposed 3,ow-Medi~.m Residential Desicnati~: The properties south, east, and west of the subject site are designated Low-Medium Residential and are developed 3t~ GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 15 with single family homes. The development of single family homes at this density has not caused any conflicts with any existing land use conditions. The Low-Medium designation would continue this designation and it is staff's opinion that it would be an appropriate alternative to the existing Medium designation. The redesignation of the subject site from Medium Residential to Low-Medium Residential would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community. Analysis of Alternative Designation: Low Residential was analyzed as an alternative to the existing Medium Residential and proposed Low-Medium Residential designations. The properties on both sides of Milliken Avenue north of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of- way are designated Low Residential and staff has not observed any land use eonf licts. There is, however, a commercial shopping center under construction to the north. The Low Residential development standards do not allow for innovative standards such as "zero lot line" and "wide-shallow" products that are allowed in the Low- Medium Residential designations which could provide fot an appropriate transition between the Low Residential land uses and the commercial site. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low Residential would not be the most appropriate land use designation. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Parts I and II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned community Amendment. 4. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties Located in Subarea F of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the location of properties with the same land use designations bordering the subject site to the south, east, and west. 31Z GPA 91-07, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 16 5. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 91- 03, Subarea F, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 03, Subarea F, to the City Council through the adoption of attached resolutions. 313 GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 17 NIyMnM •I1v.. SOHAREA G 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Surrounding Land Use and 2onina: North - Vacant, Community Facility South - Vacant, Park and School East -Single family residences, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West -Commercial shopping center under construction, village Commercial b. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Civic/community South - Park and School East -Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West -Neighborhood Commercial LAND USE ANALYSIS: Background: An application was submitted to the Planning Division on May 2, 1990, for a residential subdivision of 57 single family lots on 12.4 acres of land with an average lot size of 6,582 square feet. The project was withdrawn by the applicant on December 10, 1990. Another application was submitted to the Planning Division on July 17, 1991, for a residential subdivision and design review of 156 multiple family dwelling units on 12.4 acres of land (12.6 dwelling units per acre). The application is currently under review by staff and has not received Planning Commission approval. The earliest possible date the current application could receive a Planning Commission public hearing is November 13, 1991. For the purposes of the multiple family residential study, the withdrawal of the first application and the lack of Planning Commission approval on the second application placed the subject property in the vacant, uncommitted land category. Analysis of Proposed Low-Medium Resident' ~ n nation: The properties to the east of the subject site are designated Low-Medium Residential and are developed with single family homes. Therefore, the proposed designation would be a continuation of the same land use condition Co the east. Staff has not observed any conflicts with the adjacent land use designations, therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low-Medium Residential would be an c~ ~ t~ GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 18 appropriate alternative land use designation for the subject site. The redesignation of the subject site from Medium Residential to Low-Medium Residential would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community. c. Analysis of Alternative Desicnation: Low Residential was analyzed as an alternative to the existing Medium Residential and proposed Low-Medium Residential designations. There is a commercial shopping center to the west of the subject site and a community facilities designation to the northwest. The Low Residential development standards do not allow for innovative standards such as "zero lot line" and "wide-shallow" products that are allowed in the Low-Medium Residential designation which could provide for an appropriate transition between the commercial and community facilities designations to the west and the Low Medium Residential designation to the east. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low Residential is not the most appropriate land use designation. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Parta Z and II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned community Amendment. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. c. The properties located in Subarea G of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the location of properties with the same land use designations bordering the subject site to the east. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 91- 01, Subarea G, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 3ls GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 19 03, Subarea G, to the City Council through the adoption o£ attached resolutions. 3i ~v GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS c October 9, 1991 ~ LM Page zo ] n.Nnem Fulw~ ~~ 9 Nigh BIIBAREA B ; schew PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Flood control retention basin, Flood Control South - Existing, nonconforming lumber yard, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)) proposed for Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant, Utility Corridor West - Single family residences, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) b. General Plan Designations: Project Sita - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Flood Control/Utility Corridor South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); proposed for Low-Medium Residential (4-S dwelling units per acre) East - Flood Control/Utility Corridor West -Low-Medium Residential (4-e dwelling units per acre) LAND USE ANALYSIS: Analvais of Pron_osed~.oc~-Medium Designation: The properties to the west of the subject site are designated Low-Medium Residential and are developed with single family homes. Staff has not observed any land use conflicts on those properties and the proposed designation would be a continuation of the existing land use to the west. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low-Medium Residential would be an appropriate alternative land use designation. The redesignation of the subject site from Medium Residential to Low-Medium Residential would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community. Analvsis of Alternative Designation: Low Residential was analyzed as an alternative to the existing Medium Residential and the proposed Low-Medium Residential designations. The Low Residential development standards do not allow for innovative standards such ae "zero lot line" and "wide-shallow" products that are allowed in the Low-Medium Residential designation which could provide for appropriate development adjacent to Rochester Avenue l GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 21 which is designated as a major arterial of the future. Therefore,. it is staff's opinion that Low Residential would not be the most appropriate designation. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Parts L and II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts that will occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned community Amendment. 4. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties located in Subarea H of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use' designations as evidenced by the location of properties with the same land use deslgnation bordering the subject site to the west. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 91- O], Subarea M, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 03, Subarea H, to the City Council through the adoption of attached resolutions. GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 22 "~'~: ~~ {~:• I Y ~ ; ;} ::~..•. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: $ !~ a a. Surrounding Land Us and oning: North - Vacant, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), proposed for Low-Medium Residential (4- s dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) in the General City East -Plant storage, Utility Corridor West - Single family residences under construction, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) b. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); proposed for Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Flood Control/Utility Corridor West -Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) LAND USE ANALYSIS• a• Analvsis of Proposed row-Media Designat' The properties to the west of the subject site are designated Medium Residential and are developed with single family homes under construction which are built to the standards for Low-Medium Residential. It is staffs opinion that there are no site constraints that would make Low-Medium Residential inappropriate for the subject site. The redesignation of the subject site from Medium Residential to Low-Medium Residential would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community. c, Analvsis of Alternative D {gna Low Residential was analyzed as an alternative to •the existing Medium Residential and the proposed Low-Medium Residential designations. The Low Residential development standards do not allow for innovative standards such as "zero lot line" and "wide-shallow" products that are allowed in the Low-Medium Residential designations which could provide for appropriate development adjacent to Base Line Road which is a major arterial and Rochester Avenue which is designated ae a major arterial of the future. Therefore, 31q GPA 91-03, A THROUGH H, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 23 it is staff's opinion that Low Residential would not be the most appropriate alternative. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Parts I and II of the initial Study and has found no eignif icant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned community Amendment.' FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: a, This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan end will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b, This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties located in Subarea L of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposefl district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the location of properties with lower density land use designations bordering the subject site to the south. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 91- 03, Subarea I, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 03, Subarea I, to the City Council through the adoption of attached resolutions. 3 za GPA 9i-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS - October 9, 1991 c,,.,,,. Page 24 R~dntlsnli 8•~M BUHARE71 J '~ )jl% PROTECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: ~y'y iV[_ it ~ LM a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Medium Residential (H-14 dwelling units per acre ); proposed Por Low-Medium Residential (4- 8 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant, Utility Corridor West -Plant Storage, Utility Corridor b. General Plan Desianat ions: Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling Units per acre); proposed for LoW-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Flood Control/Utility Corridor West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor LAND USE ANALYSIS: a. The properties to the south of the subject site are designated Low-Medium Residential and the proposed designation would continue the same residential densities. The properties in the surrounding area are undeveloped, therefore, staff does not anticipate any land use conflicts to occur as a result of the proposed land use change. The redesignation of the subject site Prom Medium Residential to Low-Medium Residential would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community. Ana ysis of Alternative Des ianation: Low Residential was analyzed as an alternative to the existing Medium Residential dnd proposed Low-Mad ium Residential designations. The Low Residential development standards do not allow for innovative standards such as "zero lot line" and "wide-shallow" products that are allowed in Low-Medium Residential designations. These standards could provide for appropr tats development adjacent to the Medium Residential designation to the north and the proposed Day creek Boulevard to the east which will be a 3z- GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 25 major arterial. it is staff's opinion that Low Residential would not be the moat appropriate designation. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Parts I and II of the Initial Study and has found no signif icant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned Community Amendment. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and Conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. c. The properties located in Subarea J of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and aza compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the location of property with the same land use designation bordering the subject site to the south. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval oP General Plan Amendment 91- 03, Subarea J, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 03, Subarea J, to the City Council through the adoption of attached resolutions. 3 zz GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 26 BUBAREII x PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a. Surroundino Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre);proposed for Medium Residential (5-14 dwelling units per acre) and Neighborhood commercial South - Vacant, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East -Vacant, Utility Corridor West -Vacant, Utility Corridor b. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium-Nigh Residential (14-24 dwelling units pet acre); proposed for Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Village Commercial south - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Flaod Control/UtilS.ty Corridor West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor LAND USE ANALYSIS: a. Andlvsis_ o~Exi3tina_ Medium- Re~ideDtidlDesSsnati0~: be designatefl Medium Residential and consists of approximately eight acres of land. A parcel this size alone would make it difficult to develop a multiple family Project to the City's development standards. However, if the property in Subarea D is combined with the property in this subarea, then a multiple family project could be feasible. Therefore, it is staff's recommendation that the subject site remain Medium Residential and that the application for this subarea be denied. b. Analvsis_of Proposed Low-Medium Residential Deaionation: Medium Residential allows for flexibility in private and public open space and could allow for more flexibility to mitigate any noise and visual impacts through the design of the product. The Low-Medium Residential designation may not allow for site development that would provide for an appropriate transition between the proposed Medium Residential and Commercial uses to the north and the proposed Low Residential uses to the south. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low-Medium Residential would not be an appropriate land use designation. 323 GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 27 Analysis of Aft rnat' esicnation: Low Residential was analyzed as an alternative to the existing Medium Residential and proposed Low-Medium Residential designations. As mentioned above, Medium Residential allows for more flexibility in the design of private and public open space and could allow for more flexibility to mitigate any noise and visual impacts through the design of the product. The Low Residential designation may not allow for site development that would provide for an appropriate transition between the proposed Medium Residential and Commercial uses to the north and the proposed Low Medium Residential uses to the south. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that Low Residential would not be an appropriate land use designation. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Parts I and II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned community Amendment. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on tha facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the P1anning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment conflicts with tha Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Uae Element. c. The properties located in Subarea K of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend denial of General Pian Amendment 91-01, Subarea K, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03, Subarea K, to the City Council through tha edoption of attached resolutions. 3~-y GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 28 BUBARSA L 1. PROSECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Low-Medium Residential (4-a dwelling units per acre) south - Vacant, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre); proposed for Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant, Utility Corridor West - Vacant, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) b. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium-Nigh Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), proposed for Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East -Flood Control/Utility Corridor West -Medium-High Residential (14-2a dwelling units per acre) LAND USE ANALYSIS: The subject site has been purchased by the City and plans are under review for approval of a fire station. In the General Plan, this use would be classified as Civic/Community. During staff's review of the Victoria Planned Community land use amendments, it was considered appropriate to redesignate this site to make the development consistent with the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community. No alternative land use designations were reviewed. The redesignation of the subject site from Medium-High Residential to Civic/community (community Facilities in the Victoria Planned Community) would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned community. ENVIRONMENTAL AS P M NT: Staff has completed Parts I and iI of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned Community Amendment. 3 zS GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 29 4. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives oP the Land Use Element. c. The properties located in Subarea L of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the subject aite~s proximity to major arterials and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 91- 03, Subarea L, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 03, Subarea L, to the City Council through the adoption of attached resolutions. 32~ GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 30 BUBAASA M PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninc: North - Vacant, Village Commercial south - Vacant, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) East -Vacant, Utility Corridor West - Vacant, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre )~ proposed for Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling volts per acre) b. General Plan Desionat ions: Project Site - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) North - Neighborhood Commercial South - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) East - Flood Control/Utility Corridor West -Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre))proposed for Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) LAND USE ANALYSIS• a. designated Neighborhood Commercial (Village Commercial in the Victoria Planned Community). The proposed Foothill (I-210) Freeway off ramp for Milliken Avenue will reduce the amount of land within this Neighborhood Commercial site with the off ramp removing approximately 4.5 acres of land from the Neighborhood Commercial designation. The existing Neighborhood Commercial site would total lass than ten acres which could make if difficult to develop the site as a neighborhood shopping center. In addition, the present configuration of the existing Neighborhood Commercial designation to the north makes it difficult to provide the appropriate access needed for a commercial site given the Engineering Division's requirements for spacing of signalized intersections. The 7.895 acres of Neighborhood Commercial proposed in Subarea M, in addition to the existing Neighborhood Commercial to the north, would allow for a shopping center to be developed on a 17.16 acre parcel. Most neighborhood shopping centers in the City average between 12 and 18 acres in size. Staff has not identified any adverse affects the additional commercial zoning would 32~ GPA 91-03, A THROUGH M, SUBAREA ANALYSIS October 9, 1991 Page 31 have on the adjacent properties. Therefore, it is staffs opinion that Neighborhood Commercial (Village Commercial in the Victoria Planned Community) would be the most appropriate land use designation. The redesignation of the subject site from riedium-High Residential to Neighborhood Commercial Would not conflict with the provisions of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community. b. Analvs~s of Alternative Desicnation: Medium Residential was analyzed as an alternative to the existing Medium High Residential and the proposed Neighborhood Commercial designation. Because of the additional commercially zoned land needed for a shopping center to be developed to the north, it is staffs opinion that Medium Residential would not be the most appropriate land use designation for the subject site. ENVIRONMENTAL A ~ M~NT: Staff has completed Parts I and II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Victoria Planned Community Amendment. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding this subarea: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Isnd Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. The properties located in Subarea M of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as evidenced by the location of property with the same land use designation bordering the subject site to the north. RECODAtENDATION: Staff recommends that the planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 91- 03, Subarea M, and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91- 03, Subarea M, to the City Council through the adoption of attached resolutions. 32~ AMENDMENT LOCATION MAP HIGHLAND AVENUE 32°r EXHIBIT 'A' BASE LINE NOAD N AMENDMENT LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT "A" ~~I~.,. A,aold F.ll~a" t ~ 9z S~«6 E~~I~d .a,~~a~~ i~~laad, f,~do~a~" 91786 '~(~~,~~ ~Ci~monj~.~! Ca~r,~~f-hJ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~u -~_ ..~Q ,..-L ~ 9 / i 99~ z f,,/. ~'d~ grQ~~~~,EJ / 7'9d o77,r ~ ~. - RECEIVED ~ Yid ~~K `'G 9~7~L CITY PLFNNING DMSIDNO - 9~S /~~~~ ~ OCT p 11881 7~~d4a~1~e ~3) EXHIBIT "B" Septenber 17, 1991 Vince Bertoni Asst. Planner 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 80? Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Mr. Bertoni: - NEC EIVED - CITY OF RANCHO C11CA^dGNl:r~, PLANNING DIVISION SEP 191991 7t,8191pd1f1Y1112~3146ie a This letter is in regards to nut opposition of building condoniniuns or townhouses at Victoria and Milliken ISub-Area F) Reasons: 1. Traffic - ai ready is congested and would get worse 2. Schools - our schools are already overcrowded and this development would enhance the problem 3. Property Values - I bought here looking to increase my property value and this proposal will not allow that to happen. It is our understanding that single family hones were to be bui l~t at this site and not condaniniuns or townhouses. I'm interested in keeping Victoria as it is - A Great Place to Live... Sincerely, ~ / ` / Mr. and Mrs. Douglas Watt 33 2 EXHIBIT •c• ~~7i~~'y~`yv ~~ ^ . cirr or a YC ECIVED ~6N ~ ~~..,~ -, ^ . r^~, /~..P2 ~ ~ N.tw, Dunn nc Civ~si0v SEP R4 iGii vM ~y,~ ~, yj,~~ `~ u.`P~ ~err~n~ UGC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~.,co 0 3 ~~ 3 :~ ~~ f ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ . • ~~~ ,~ :~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~w~~~ ~~~. ~~ ~ u~ ~~e, ~ '°~~- ~~~ ~"`~~- P~ -- -ems, ~v~Z~~ u/L u,~~7 ~ ~~ .,.,. ., ~ /ur/~,,~~.aw' . .333 EXHIBIT •p• ciir ai naf Cn0 cEC MONCa r•?nv ,.. ~ . 74^i 7/q/ ~~ ~~. ~~.~~ 80~ ,~,'a~rGf Cu~~.c , cr9 ~ SEP 801991 718191pQ111Y11~3M~18 ~~~~~ `~~nc/o ~a.~ .~ ~~ lea-mual ~~ia'. ~, ~ ~. ~ ~- .r .~.~ .,,ems- ~cQ. z~,.~ ~ ~- .~~:~ r~ ,~ ~ c~~,~e .~-~ ,wee. ~ T~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~9f~ S.~Pe-vie ~• 33y EXHIBIT "E' ~t C~ . c.~- 9/70/ LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC. September 23, 1991 Mr. Vince Bertoni Assistant Planner R4rxC~AOIXK'.4MLY1C"a4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 807 Ranchu Cucamonga. CA 91729 - RFC,iIVEb -- ~ OCT 011991 ~ 7)8(9(~I)ll(12(1(2)8~516 RE: 2g.2 Acres at the Northeast Corner of Baseline end Milliken in Rancho Cucamonga, California (Parcels A and 8 on attached map) Dear Mr. Bertoni: Thank you for your letter of August 29, 1991, advising us of the meeting on September 10, 1991. Unfortunately, the letter was addressed to the wrong office, and I did not receive it until several days after the proposed meeting date. To avoid future scheduling problems, please direct all correspondence to the following address: Lincoln Maravilla Limited Partnership 30 Executive Park, Suite 100 P.O. Box 19547 Irvine. CA 92713 Attn: R. Scof Sellers I regret the fact that I did not learn of the September 10 meeting in time to attend and express our opinions on the proposed general plan amendment. Hopefully, this letter will serve to adequately inform you, the Planning Director, the Planning Commission and the City Council of our serious concerns with the proposed amendment. Before I elaborate on our concerns, some background information may be helpful. Lincoln Maravilla Limited Partnership ('LMLP") purchased This property in November of 1989. At that time, the property was clearly designated for multi-family housing development, and the Community Plan designation showed half the property as Medium density and half the property as Medium-High density. Additionally, the Victoria Community Plan ("VCP') was based upon an overall aggregate density for Victoria that the City acknowledged needed to be somewhat flexible with respect to specific parcels in Victoria. In keeping with this flexibility, the VCP allowed the density on any parcel to be increased to the next highest density category merely through a vole of the Planning Commission in conjunction wdh the approval of a site plan, development plan and tentative map. The VCP also specifically provided that a minimum of 15% of the total units in Victoria were to be "affordable housing." At the time we looked at the property, no rental housing had yet been constructed anywhere in Victoria. As of the date of this letter, over two years after our first involvement with the property, there has still been no rental housing opened in Victoria (although 124 units are now under 7(I Gxccuuvc Park Suitc 100 P.O. 8nz 195J7 Irvinc, Calitnr~~Y2711 ~75J7 (71J1 261-2100 EXH)0)T "F' construction), despite the specific language requiring affordable housing in the original VCP. With these background facts in mind, we purchased the property and proceeded ro begin our site planning and elevation design for the property. In June of 1990, following extensive meetings antl discussions with planning staff and Design Review Committee ('DRC'), and the approval of our plans by the DRC, we went before the Planning Commission for the final approval of our project. One of the live Commissioners Was absent that evening, and our project received a technical denial on a 2-2 vote. The planning Commissioners comments that night made it very clear that in their words 'density Was not the issue'. In fact, more than one of them ;aid that higher dens;~~, multi-family housing actually belonged en this comer bedause of the tragic patterns in the Ciry, and other considerations. There was extensive neighhorhood opposition expressed at the Planning Commission meeting that night. The bulk of the apposition centered around the fact that this was a rental housing deveopment, not a for sale housing development. We had two previous meetings with the concerned citizens, at which most of them expressed a consistent comment to me, if we would only change this to a for sale housing development as opposed to a rental development, they would not have a problem with it. Unfortunatety, for perhaps everyone concerned, this was not something we were in a position to be able to do. Following the Planning Commission meeting, we evaluated our optbns. In the spirit of cooperation with the community, we asked the Planning Commission to reconsider our development, following a series of several meetings with the neighbors, and a number of a number of revisions to our plan. As a result of over three months of these meetings, we made extensive revisions to our development plan, including, but not limited to, the following: - Deletion of over 30 units from the plan - Addition of a full perimeter fence around the development, and security gates at both entrances - Deletion of all carports - Additive of cna enclosed garage per unit Revision of the site plan to include over 50", open space - Deletion of all three story buildings - Revision of building elevations to include single story elements of the buildings - Many other improvements We again want to the Planning Commission in November of f 990. After making all of these revisions to our plan, and extensive ongoing discussions with planning staff and the neighbors surrounding the project and another approval of the project by the DRC, we were turned down by the Planning Commission 5-0. Even the members of the DRC that previously approved our project voted against it. It was very difficult for me to understand why a project that lost on a 24 tie vote would be turned down five months later 5-0, after extensive improvements had been made to the original plan. 33r.~ However, again, at this Planning Commission review, it was stated several times that density was not the issue. Several of the Commissioners seemed to focus on the 'quality' of the devak>pment, and commented that it was not 'unique' enough to be located across the street hom Me planned Ciry Central Park. I was asked in my public testimony to state what was 'unique and different' about this prolect that it should merit approval. Unfortunately, my view of what was unique and different about the project was not consistent with what the Commissioners must have had in mind, and we were faced with the prospect of finding other ways to make the project 'unique and different' so that it would receive approval. Repeatedry, though, at this Planning Commission meeting, it was emphasized by the majority of the Commissioners, that density was not the issue. Not knowing what else we could do ro revise the proect to make it 'unque and different, and becoming increasingly concerned with the inconsistencies in the process (we could be approved by the DRC, but turned down unanimously at Planning Commission), we appealed M the Ciry Council for a review of our case. This case was heard before Ciry Council in January of 1991. Again, the citizens expressed their concerns, and we expressed our concerns about the history behind the project and the seeming inconsistencies in how it had been handled. We sincerely wanted to understand what issues we needed to address to design a project that was acceptable to all parties concerned . We went through each of the potential concerns before the Ciry Council. We were told again, that density was not the issue, rental housing was not the issue, and that deveopment of the site in general was not the issue. In fact, the only issue that remained for us to resolve was the 'transition in density' from the northerly ten acres (designated Medium 8-14 units per acre), to the southerly ten acres (designated Medium-High 14-24 units per acre). Our planning had not contemplated a transition in density between these two sites, because When we initially laid out the site plan, we felt that a blended density (an overall blend of approximately 16 units per acre) would create a more consistent end pleasing community. As mentioned previously, the VCP allowed this approach to the site plan. This provision, however, was eliminated approximately nine months into our approval process, unless granted by an act of the Ciry Council. Tha result of the City Council meeting was a denial of our appeal, but with very specific admonitions to us. One of these was that the issue we needed to address was the transition in density. Ws ware not requested to reduce the overall density on the site, nor to delete multi-family housing or rental housing from our property. We were asked to follow the underlying zoning designations on the property as desginated in the VCP. In fact, Council encouraged us to resubmit a plan, and even allowed a resubmission of our plan with no fees payable to the Ciry. Following the Ciry Council meeting, the City's planning stall spent a significant amount of time developing new Multi-family Design Guidelines. As we reconsidered our site plan, and elevations, we monitored the progress of the new Muld-Family Design Guidelines, and worked to adjust our plan tc be consistent with the new guidelines. We also sought out an alternative use for the northery five acres of the property. so that a buffer could be provided between the existing single family homes and the multi-lamily housing. In addition, we then planned the next five acres at a lower density, and placed the higher density portion of the development in the 'MH' designation. 337 Our new plans, which contain all of these revisions made in specific response to the commentsreceived at the January Ciry Council meeting, were submitted approximately three weeks ago. Additionally. we have completely revised the building plans and elevations to make several other improvements, including: - All units now have garages that are attached to the buildings (mis was a big issue brought up by the neighbors). Less than 20 0 or the total units in ?he project are one bedrooms. - There are over six different floorplans. • There are some carriage units in the development. - There are significant amounts of open space in the develpment. - To the best of our knowledge, the proposed plans ere essentially consistent with the new multi• fatuity design guidelines enacted by the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga. • Overall density has been reduced by 62 units. After all of this, we recentty received the notice that the Ciry is considering a unilateral downzoning of our property. I do not have to elaborate on the extensive economic hardship that the denials we have experienced to date have caused us. However, this newly proposed downzoning would result in an economic hardship of even far greater magnitude. I noted with interest that the language in the City Council resolution specifically requested an evaluation of 'potential future residential development based on current vacant uncommitted residential acreages...'. Our site was evaluated for the purposes of this analysis, yet the City's own Housing Element component of the General Plan does not categorize our site as 'vacant uncommitted acreage'. Ir. fart, the Housing Element designates nor site, and several others, as properties with plans currently being processed. This designation would, by definition, remove our site from consideration for the unilateral downzoning proposed in your letter. On this basis our site should not be at risk for the downzoning. If the Ciry would like to use our property for purposes other than multifamily housing, which it is currently zoned for (and has been zoned for since we first got involved with it), we would be happy to sell it to the Ciry for fair and equitable compensaton. I would be pleased to meet with the City Manager, members of the Community Development Department, or any other appropriate individuals to discuss This avenue. A purchase of our land by the City is a far more appropriate way to change the use of the property, than the proposed unilateral downzoning, which in our opinion, constitutes a taking of our property without compensation. !f this is not an alternative the Ciry will entertain, then I strongly urge you to delete our property from consideration for this general plan amendment on the grounds that it does not comprise 'current vacant uncommitted residential acreage.' Additonally, there is an ongoing application being processed 33B for the property to reflect the redesign discussed above, and a bng-standing history of discussions that is inconsistent with the proposed Changes. I will be happy to make myself available to meet with one or more members of the City staff, Planning Commission or the City Council, ro discuss this situation in greater detail. Thank you. Respecttulty Submitted, LINCOLN MARAVILLA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BV: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N0.2127, Limited Padnershp ifs General Partner r t , v i ~?=~+~ ~ ~ i; / R. Scof Sellers, a Managing General Partner RSS;cIt cc: Brad Buller Jim Markman, Ciry Attorney Jack Lam, Ciry Manager Jerry Walsh, Esq. Kevin Hampton Dan Richards City Council: Mayor Dennis L. Stout Mayor Proter. William J. Alexander Diane Williams Pamela J. Wright Charles J. Buquat II Planning commission: Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Melchor Commissioner Tolatoy Commissioner Valletta 3b9 ...,. ENV RONMSNTAL ASSE SMENT AND GENERAL NOMENT 91 03 CIT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land Uae Map within the Victoria Planned Community ae described below: I. From Medium Hlgh Ree idential (14-26 dwelling unite per acre) to Medium Residential (8-16 dwelling unite per acre for the following eubareae: A. For 10.0 acree of land located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: Portion of 227-691-O 1. B. For 19.3 ncree of land located on the north aide of ease Line Road, we et of Vittoria Park Lane, and east of the recreational vehicle self storage facility - APN: 227-091-14 and 15. C. For 21.77 acree of land located on the northwest corner of Babe Line Road and the future Day Creak Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-091-18 and 19, 227-091-20 through 22, and 227-091-63. D. For 7.895 acree of land located between approximately 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west aide of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Port ton of 227-021-03 and 13. The Planning Coemniee ion will also cone ider Low Medium Reeitlential (4-8 dwellln9 unite per acre) ae an altecnat lve land use designation for the preceding four eubareae. 2. From Medium Residential (8-16 dwelling unite pet acre) to Low Hedium Residential (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) for the following eubareae: E. For 10.1 acree of lend located on the east Bide of Milliken Avenue south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way - APN: Portion of 227-691-01. F. For 18 acree of land located on the east Bide of Milliken Avenue between Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way - APN: 227-011-17. G. For 11.87 ecrea of land located on the northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Woodruff Places - APN: 227-011-28. H. Por 23.03 acree of land located on the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lana and ROCheeter Avenue - APN: 227-091-91. I. For 32.14 acree of land located on the northeast corner of Eaee Line Road end Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-091-45 antl 46 and a portion of 227-091-44. J. For 20.895 acree of lend npproximately 892 feat north of the tutu re Victoria Park Lane extene ion on the west side of the future Day Creek eoulevatd. - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. K. Por 7.895 acree of land locates between approximately 892 feet and 1,200 feat north of Lhe future Victoria Park Lena sztene ton on the west olds of the future Dny Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The Planning Commies ion will also consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per ncre) as an alternatlw land use designer ion Por the preceding seven subareas. 3. From Medium High Residential (14-24 dwellln9 units per acre) to Civic/Community Eor the following subarea: L. Foz 2.46 ecrea of Lentl approximately 606 feet south of <he Southern PaciElc Railroad right-of-wny and approximately 321 feet west of eha future ^ey Creek Bou lavartl - APN: Portion of 227-091-18 and 19. Planning commission Minutes •9:~- October 9, 1991 ~~{D 4. From Medium Nigh Residential (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) tc Neighi.orhood Commercial for the following subarea: M. Foz 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 600 feet and 1,000 feet south of Highlantl Avenue On the west aide of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 end 13. The Planning Commies ion will also consider Medium Residential (H-i4 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative land use designation for the preeedi ng subarea. Staff reecrtvnende issuance of a Negative Declaration for the entire application. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PL NNED COMMVN ITY AxENOMENT 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal t0 amend the General Plan Land U9e Map within the Victoria Planned Ccmmunity ae described below: 1. From Medium High Residential (14-26 dwelling unite per acre) to Hedium Residential (8-16 dwelling unite per acre for the following eubareaa: A. For 10.0 acres of land located on Che nort haaat corner of ease Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: Portion of 227-691-O1. H. Fot 19.3 scree of land located on the north aide of enea Line Roadr weer Of Victoria Patk Lane, and east of the recreational vehicle self storage facility - APN: 227-091-14 and 15. C. For 21.77 acres of land located on the notthweet corner of Base Line Road and the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Po ttion of 227-091-18 and 19, 227-091-20 through 22, and 227-091-43. D. For 7.895 acres Of land located between approximately 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west aide of the future Day Creak Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. The Planning Commission will also consider Low Nedlum Residential (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative lantl use tlesignat ion Eor the preceding four eubazeae. 2. Prom Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low Medium Res ident iel (4-e dwelling unite per acre) for the following subareas: E. For 10.1 acres Of lantl located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way - APN: Port Lon of 227-691-01. F. For 18 scree o£ land located on the east eitle of Milliken Avenue between Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way - APN: 227-011-17. C. For 11.87 acres of lend located on the northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Woodruff Piece - APN: 227-011-26. x. For 23.03 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Roche Bter Avenue - APN: 227-091-E1. I. Pot 32.14 acres of land located on the northeast corner of ease Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-091-46 and 46 and a potelon of 227-091-d4. J. For 20.095 acres of lend approximately 892 Eeet north Of the future Victoria Park Lane extension on the west aide of [he future Day Creek Boulevard. - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 antl 13. K, For 7.895 scree of land located between approximately 092 fee[ and 1,200 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lane extension on the west aide of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-021-03 and 13. Planning Commlegion Minutes .iy October 9, 199: 3yl The Planning Commie aion will also consider Low Ree idential (2-9 dwelling unite per acre) ae an alternative land use designation far the preceding seven subareas. 3. From Ned rum High Ree ident ial (16-24 dwelling units per acre) to Community Facilities for the following subarea: L. Por 2.46 acres of land approximately 606 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way and approximately 321 Eeet weer of the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: Portion of 227-091-10 and 19. 4. Prom Medium High Residential (16-24 dwelling unite per acre) to Village Commercial for the following subarea: M. For 7.095 acres of land located between approximately 600 feet and 1,000 Eeet south of Highland Avenue on the west aide of the future Day Creek Bou leva[d - APN: PO[t ion of 227-021-03 and 13. The Plana Lrg Commie lion will also cone ider Medrum Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) as an alternative land uea designation for the preceding subarea. Staff recommends ieeua nee of a Negative Declarai ion for the entire application. Alan Warren, Aaeociate Planner, presented the staff report. Me provided copies of a petition signed by 13B residents supporting the radeeignat ion of Subareas F and G from Medium to Law Medium and a letter from the attorney Ecr the owner of the property located in Subareas A and E objecting to any redeaignation Of rho ee subareas. Ne submitted a suggested order of consideration of the various subareas. Commies toner Val lette requested further discussion on staff's rational for recommendations far epee ific sites. Mr. Warren stated that et aEf hatl accepted the direction of the City Council to retluce the number of multiple family unite at build-out. Xe et at ed the et aEf report then looked at land use relat ionehlp perepect ive to see where it would be best to seek reductions. He said that if a given site did not warrant changing because of rte relet ionehlp to ex rating or future features, it was not recommended Eor change. Comm is stoner Melchor questioned the calculation of a lose of 2,069 unite iE staff's recommendat lone were adopted. He thought the lone would only be approximately 1,300 unite. Mr. warren stated staff calculated building aC 62 percent of the dens icy range. Commies inner Melcher asked if staff had considered the impact of the lose of people on commercial interests and the impact on lantlecape ae easements. He feared the lose of unite would cause the landscape ae eeeemente to increase dramatically and felt that impact should be ldent if red. Me asked if future infrastructure needs should be reassessed to take into account the lower population. He asked if the Clty would need to reassess and possibly redesign facilities, such se the library, fire stations, etc. Ne questioned why the Planning Comm tee ion Ninu tee ~tW~ October 9, 199 34z mixed use analyaie of Subarea C would not also apply to Subareas B, H, and i, which also front on the same tzaneportation corridor. He coMnentetl that a development proposal was in proceae for Subareas A and E with a dif £ersnt break line. He asked if the line between Subareas A and E could be a floating line. Mr. Warren stated he taw no problem with a different configutai ion between Subareas A and E if the Planning Comrieeton should ao direct. He said a floating line would be a gray area, but could be considered. He said staff hatl already received a proposal for a government inet trot tonal use in Subarea L that may make it appropriate to coneidet a mixed use tlee ignat ion for Subarea C. Ne stated that eteff did not investigate how the potential for a leaser population would affect a business' anti<ipation of population. He said the 65 percent single family varsu9 35 percent multi-family ecenarl0 figures were forwarded to the government agenelee which may be affected, including the e<hool dietricte, fire, police, and engineering. He stated that staff nad not been told that the ef£ecta would be significant. He enid epeciflcelly the traffic analyele had indicated the effect would be almost neutral because they estimate single family dwel lingo generate a higher number of tripe. Ne reported that the prevteue City Engineer felt there may be a el ight increase in street maintenance costa because there Would be more public streets, whereas in multi-family developments there are more private streets. However, he stated the city Engineer felt the minimal increase could ba easily absorbed. Commies inner Melchor asked if the landscape eeeeeements were specifically cone Ldered. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, reported that all of Che issues were acknowledged and diecuseed thoroughly during the arty counctl workehope on multi-family reduction. Ne eaitl it was acknowledged Chat the Landscape Maintenance Oietrict aeeeeamente will increase. He Bald the schools indicated there would be no Smpacte from the reduced eiudente. Ha reported that police services did an extensive study and felt there was ne dif Eerenca in the number of ca lie for multi-family tea ident ial as opposed to single-family Yeeidential. He stated the question of economic impact on conuneccial properties ie not a mandatory environmental issue under CEQA. Ns said era Ef did consider the impact, but the lose ie such a email percentage over the total dwelling unite in the City. He said the type of protlucte purchased by single family dwe llace would be different from Chose purchased by multi-family unit dwellers. Commissioner Helcher agreed but etatetl the question ernes because Lhe City has been concernetl about the amount o£ land zoned for Commezoial uses and the City ie continually assaulted by requests for more Commercial zoning. He felt the Commission should be more attentive to requeete far add It tonal Commercial when the number of unite are declining. Mr. Henderson eteted that staff was suggesting a change to Commercial for Subarea M because of the lose of acreage due to Che freeway end the alignment of the future attest whleh will be to the south. He felt it use better to Planning commieeion Minutes ~0~,- October 9, 199: 3 43 have a large irregular parcel than a small one to accommodate buffering, loading, and access issues. Mr. Warren et ated that because larger tamil tea tend to live in eingle-family home e, the number of unite loot woultl not mean a corresponding lose in the number of people. chairman McNiel openetl tae public hearLng. He asked for comments regarding Subareaa A antl E. Scot Sellers, Lincoln Masav ills Limited Partnership, 30 Executive Place, Irvine, expreaeetl eoncerna about the process and stated they had previously submitted a proposal for Subareaa A antl E. He stated the City Council had directed that they resubmit Lheir project with no adtlitional planning fees due. He aaid tact comments were made during the previous processing that density was not an issue. He questioned the fairness of redeaignati ng their lantl antl felt due proeeae was being ignored. He said they had resubmitted a full applicat tan a month ago and tae project was in process. Chris Lininger, fie62 Sorrento Aoad, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he moved into the area 6ecauee he felt ii was a viable growing community. He ohjected to the prospect of condominiums tc the north or south aide of hie eingle-family neighborhood. Carlos Galeazzi, 6753 Salerno Place, Raneho Cucamonga, siatetl he had moved from hie old neighborhood when developers bought R1 property, obtained rezoning and variance e, antl built multi-family unite. Ns said when he fire[ moved to Aancho Cucamonga he saw candominiuma south of Haee Line Road antl single family homes to Lhe north. He felt ease Line Road ie a good buffer zone and condominiums should not be built north of Lt. He asked the Commission to recone ider the planned community 6ecauae he felt it tlid not reflect good planning to build condominiums in an area of eingle family homes. Chairman HcNiel stated that the Victoria Planned Community Specific Plan was adopted Sn 1981 covering approximately 2,100 acres. xe said at that time the mix of housing permitted approx imaialy 9,000 housing unite with each type of housing range located Ln all areas, from 1/2-acre eingle family to apartments or candominiuma. He stated the plan wee sensitive to the issues of tae relat ionehtp of one use adjoining the other and therefore the Medium range was pieced next to Medium Nigh, not Nigh. Ne said each area was Lo be a mixture of types of housing eo all residents would have access to facilities such as commercial development, parka, etc. Re stated the developers in Victoria developed the majority of eingle family houses fLr at and they are now develapLnq tae mu It L-family unite. Mi. Galeazzi stated they had not been notlELetl that multi-faintly unite were planned when they purchaeetl their home. Commies toner Valletta asked if Mr. Galeazzi was aware that moat of the staff's recommendations were for lowering the zoning. Planning Commlaeian Minutes -~ October 9, 199: 34y Mr. caleazzi eiated he was grateful that a downgrading of density was proposed, Dui he felt that multi-family housing ie an eyesore when placed next to single family unite. Paul Adair, 11410 Lomello Nay, Aancho Cucamonga, stated that Baee Line and Milliken are well traveled streets and a visitor's first impression will be that Victoria is an apartment community if multi-family unite era built at that intersection. HB Lhought a bus station or Due pick-up point would be placed by Central Psrk and the apartments and he felt that would create problems. H¢ said they moved to Victoria because they thought moat of the apartments were going to be kept in Terra Vista. Cato Johnson, 6989 Mariano Place, Rancho Cucamonga, asked if the Commission may coneitler downzoning beyond whet had Deen recommended by staff. She felt the preference of the residents was for Low Medium for Sabarese A and E, but stated she understood the Commission had to consider the developer and those that are looking to buy affordable housing. Chairmen McNiel caked for comments regarding Subareas F and G. Gary Luque, William Lyon Company, 7272 !B Victoria Paik Lane, Rancho Cucamonga, etaied they were the developers of the Victor ie Planned Community. He said he would like to address all of the William Lyon Company owned lend in the various subareas. He commented that Victoria le n master planned community and the specific plan wee based on a certain number of unite to support the Grails, parka, etc. He et ated the plan was approved in 1981 and at the time Lyon owned aDOUi 1,600 of the 2,100 scree in the plan. He reported that the original plan approved a density of 7,57: unite on the Lyon- owned property Dut Lhe community plan was revised in 1988 and the density was lowered in the Lekee South arse by B15 unite, an 11 percent decrease. Ne said that elthougD the William Lyon Company bel ievee the issue of density ie more of an issue elsewhere in the Ciiy than in Victoria, they were willing to cooperate with the City to help achieve a reduction in density. He ea id Lhat when the orlginsl apartment project was proposed for Subareas A and E, residents Dad objected to a ^for tent^ project end had eiated they would not object to owner occupied unite. He etaied they Dad submit red an apartment project in Subarea X and they would De agreeable to having that site downzoned Co Medium density. He recommended that Subarea J remain Medium rather than going to Low Medium Dec ease it ie an isolated site with a detention boa In antl Southern California Etlleon corridor tc the went end Oay Creek Bou leveed antl a Southern California Edison corridor to the east. He thought a single family development in that Brea would Teed to a walled community and he requested they be able to develop a mote creative Bite plan that would provide a more aesthetic frontage along Victoria Park Lane and Day Creek Boulevard. Xe requested that Subarea H remain designated at Medium. Ne asked that they be permitted to develop on 4,000 square foot lore )50 x BO feet) for single family detached homes if the City proceeded to downzone Subaten H to Low Medium. He said surrounding areas wer¢ developed with 3,000, 4,000, enO 4r 500 square foot lot e. He thought Subareas F and c should remain Medium ae they adjoin a future freeway offramp at Milliken, a park, and a shopping center. Ne said that etud.ee indicated that traffic would decrea¢e slightly if ens Planning Commission Minutes -!9e October 9, 1991 34s site were to remain multi-family. He said adjoining neighbors had expressed concern about home values but he felt they would be developed with nice products and it would enhance property values. He felt a sea of Low Medium single family hcueee would create an oversupply of single family homes and would not raise property values. He thought the buyers for the town house and condominium projects would be in an Lncoma range of $50,000 to over $70,000. He said the proposals he had just made would represent a decrease of 66'7 unite, which would bring the total unite on their property down to 6,093, another 9 percent decrease from the 7,575 originally approved. He said that Homeowners' Aeeoci at ions are reepone ib le for maintaining the landscaping to the curb on multi-family projects and if the proper[ lee are downzoned to Law Medium, the Ciiy would have to maintain the landscaping. He said there would be a combination of fewer unite in Victoria to incur the expense of the land acape maintenance allo<eticn and increased costs because more landac aping will be maintained by the City. Hr. Luque stated he had been contacted by a gentleman who said he use concerned about multi-family development, but he was equating multi-family development with apartments. He said multi-family development could be a full spectrum of product types, not just apartments. He felt Chat Victoria mat the objective of trying to provide the single-family Look that the City wants to achieve. Chairman McNiel asked whac was located to the north and west of Subarea c. Mr. Luque responded the 5 acres is designated Community Facilities and had been sold to a church. Mr. Atlair et ated he had distributed one of the petit lone. Ne said moat of the residents he talked to were not aware of what was going on. He et aced there was a serious accident ear ller that day on Victoria Park Lana and Milliken and speed ie already a problem. He was concerned that iratfic on Victoria Park Lane will increase because of the freeway exit on Milliken, the high school, and more mu It l-tamily projects. He stated graffiti hoe been a problem in the parka antl he felt multi-family unite will add to the problem. He thought the property values will 9o down. He saitl he talked to people in the various developments end they all indicated they had been toltl that there would not be multi-family unite built next to them. He Eeared that some of the condominiums would be purchased Dy investors who would rent them oui. He felt that downzoning would heat serve the nestle of the Vletorla Park rea ldente even if it meant higher taxes. Fred Forme 1, bB 16 Palermo Place, Rancho Cucamonga, et ated he represen<ed the Crown Point tract. He submitted a pat [Glom, which had been signed by 42 residents, supporting etaf E'e reconmentlai lone. He Bald there era three parka in their community which are already very busy. He stated Ghe schoo le are filled already. He said the realtor told him that single family homes would be built in Subarea F. Oelia Adair, 11410 Lomello way, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she and her husband had walked to get the 138 petition eignaturae. She said she ie a realtor antl she hoe three boyars who have indicated they do not want to live in Terra V ie to because of the epartmente and condom in iome in the area. She said at the Planning Commies ion Minutes -¢p October 9, 1991 3y~ time they moved to their home there had been signs posted in Subarea F indicating that single family homes would be built. She complained that the zoning had then changed and the sign was changed to single family, attached homes, and then molt i-family homes. She stated that schools were overcrowded. She was concerned that the graffiti in the park would increase if multi-family unite were built. Commissioner Valletta commented that the zoning had not changed and a developer is able to put in either single family or multi-family homes in an area zoned for Hed sum. Mike Cor kle, 65]1 Mimosa Place, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he would like to speak regarding all subareas. He said he had lived in the Victoria project for 6-1/2 years. He eaitl that although he lived close to a high density project, he had never had any problems and hie home had doubled in price since he purchased it. Ha supported reasonable, intelligently planned, affordable housing. He said that although there recently had been a rasher aubaianiial increase in landscape maintenance fees, the City had atlviead that only minimum maintenance could be performed because of lack of funds. He was concerned that if the dens sty numbers ware lowered sober ant tally that landscape maintenance feae would escalate dzamat trolly. Me Eelt Victoria had be¢n an exceptional place to live. Che irmen McNiel asked for comments regaed ing Subareas C, L, and B. Mr. Buller stated that the staff report included a letter Erom a property owner in Subarea B, indicating she could not attend the meeting. He said he had spoken with her on the tel¢phone and she was concernetl and oppo aed the proposed redeeignation. Chairman McNiel ae ked for comments regarding Subereae J, M, M, and D. As there was no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Mr. Warren stated that moat of the concerns raleed by the reeitlents were part ins city council's decie ion to consider lowering the density. General Plan Land Amendment 91-03 Isubareae A and E1 and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03 f9ubareaa A and E1: chalrman McNiel stated the Commie eion nod received a letter Erom the attorney for Lincoln, the property owner of Buba[eae A and E. He asked the City Attorney to comment on the letter's assertion that the Clty had no right co red ea ignore the property. Ralph Naneon, Deputy City Attorney, stated the letter questions the City's interpretation on et atue of uncommitted properties to be inc ludetl in the review. He did not believe that Lin co ln'e previous actions nod generated a vested right. Ha did no[ agree with the letter's interpretation of CEpA issues, and said Coat the cone idered action would reduce the lmpacte. He stated that staff had already addressed the Lmpact on the housing element. He commented that the Letter et ated the intent of the City's program to cone itler Plannino Commission Hinutea -~- October 9r 1991 34~ downzoning was directed apecif ically at Lincoln's proposal. He stated they were not the only affected area. Hr. Hanson felt the Commission was free to make a recommendation to the City Council. Commissioner Vallette siaietl she had spoken with Hr. Warren and part of staff's rationale for not recommending Low Hedium for Subarea A waa that the property is located at the major intersection of Mill ikon and Baee Line. She said staff felt some of the noise factors may De Defter mitigated by a Medium density project than a Low Medium density one. She felt both A and & could be redea ig noted to Metlium. Commies loner Chit lea ai ated Low Metlium might works however, she felt the Hedium designer ion on Subarea A might provide a better transition. Chairman McNlel stated that the railroad separates the two parcels and there ie oleo a grade eeparat ion. Commissioner Vallette stated she had received a telephone call from resident Pat Dutton, supporting lowering the density to Medium on the south portion and retaining Medium on the north portion. Commiaeioner Toletoy felt that because of the proximity to Lhe park, the shopping center, and ewe busy streets (Bata LLne and Milliken), Suberaa B should remain Hedium and Subarea A coultl De redaelgnaLetl to Hedium. Commieaioner Helcher did not object in principal to etaff'• proposals of Metlium for Subarea A and Low Medium for Subarea 6. However, he felt there was a compelling body of previous action which entitled the current properly owner to a Eu 11 review of their current propoeel before the land ie redesignated. He said that several of the Cammleeionete end Lhe City Council hed told the developer that a previous denial was not based on a question of density. He thought that whether or not the new proposal ie approvable was not germane et this point, but he felt it would only be fair to allow the proposal to proceed. xe requested that action on Sabarese A and E be deferred until after an already scheduled workshop with the developer. Commissioner Vallette Eelt the two paresis had received due process. She tlitl not feel respone Lb le for what hed happened Ln the process. She Bald she waa addressing the parcels ae part of the entire Victoria Plan and the decie ion should be related to land use end zoningr not what the project proponent was proposing. Chairman McNlel agreed thnt the applicant had been in process for a long lime regartling projects on that patticuler Bite. However, he said the zoning issues with respect to multi-family or attached single family had been e subject of discussion and coneiderat ion for a long [ime at both Planning Commission and City Council level. He felt the developer had had an opportunity to deal with any proposed changes. Comm ieeioner Chitlea agreed that many euggeetione had been mode to the developer when their ptoj sct wee first submitted and the developer had chosen Planning Commission Minutes ~(p October 9, 1591 3y8 not to address the suggestions. she thought the project may have been more advanced in the process if the developer had been willing to make the changes requested. she did not feel the City was responei6le for the fact that the project had not already been approved. Commissioner To leioy stated that the meetings held after the prof ecC was denied had changed hie former views on the project and he now felt density is a» ie6ue. He agreed thnt if the project had originally been of the quality the Commission was looking for, ii would have been acceptable at that Lime. Chairman McNiel asked what the other Commissioners felt regarding MedLUm on Subarea E. Commissioner Helcher felt the grade eepatetion antl the presence of the rail load provides a aubeiant ial and adequate zone transition. He reiterated that he agreed with the proposal in principal, but there was et L11 a question of fairness in hie mintl. He felt the original Victoria Plan was goad planning and the changes over time have been good changes. He acknowledged that no plan Le meant to be a fixed document forever. Commies toner Ch ii lea preferred staff's recommendation of Hedium for Subarea A and Low Hedium for Subarea E. Commtea ioneY Toletoy felt both Subareas A and E would be Med Lum. Motion: Moved by Val latte, seconded by Chitiee, to recommend Seeuance of a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 91-03 (Subarea A) and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03 (subarea A} changing the land use designs[ ion to Medium. Motion carrietl by the following vote: AYES: COMHISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCN IEL, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MELCNER ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -ca tried Motion: Moved by Melrhsr, seconded by McNiel, to recommend denial of General Plan Amendment 91-03 (Subarea E) antl Vletoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03 (Subs ree E). Hotion carried by the following vote: AYESt COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCNER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried R R e al P n n e dm ni 9 ] uba an O nd V o 'a Panned Community Amendment 91-03 (Subareas F and O1: Planning Commission Mtnutee +~ October 9, 1991 l 1 Chairman HcNiel stated that staff's recommendation had been Medium Lo Low Medium on both subareas and the majority of the public had supported the Low Hed ium, while Mr. Luque had requested the areas remain Medium. Comm iseioner Helcher commented that one Victoria resident had spoken in favor of retaining the exist ing designer ions and was pl¢ased to see proposals that would rekindle the more affordable characterist is of the community. Ne also commented that a developer stated the projects would be marketed to people with an income range of 550,000 to $75,000. Commissioner Valleite stated eha Dad received a telephone call Erom reeitlent Ed Swietock who lives to the west Of Subarea F. She said he endorsed ataff•a recommendation of Low Medium. Commi eeioner Melchor et ntad that Commlee toner Toletoy and he met with the developer and Mr. Buller several days eqc regarding the two areas. He said he and Commissioner Toletoy spent a great deal of time in the area a few days later. He said he initially Eelt attached housing might be appropriate but at Oeaign Review he Dad an Opportunity to look at the proposals and Doth appeared pedestrian. He stated ihnt earlier applications which had been withdrawn had been for single family development. Commi6eio net Valleite euppo[isd the staff's recommendation for Low Medium and at aced it would provide consistency with the eurrountling neighborhood. She thought attached housing Ln a Medium density area Lf acceptable if there ie a eranaition from single family to the attached houeing. SDe felt Chat if the area w¢re kept at Medium end the attached houeing product ware not 6u ilt, that the loco would De too email. She thought too many homes have been crammed togeCher on lots of less than 5,000 square teat. Commissioner Chit tea agreetl wish the Low Metlium recommendation. Commissioner Toletoy felt that Sabarese F and G have interesting characteristics. Ne said they are bordered by two ma}or thoroughfares (Highland and Milliken Avenues(, close to commercial development, ntljacent to a perk, antl are buffered from atl}scent single family houses by peaeoe. Ne felt that if Nedium reetdential were to be in the area, Sabarese F and c would De the proper sites. He euppottetl Medium. Commissioner Helcher stated the reasons cited by Commleelaner Toletoy were Che usual planning precepts that governed the ort91ne1 layout. He said that logic ie still valid. Commissioner Chitiea stated she agreed with Commieeioner Toletoy in theory, but stated that even at the Low Medium designation, Lt ie crowded. She felt Low Medium is more appropriate to the existing neighborhoods. She eupporced the City Council's goal of lowering the multi-family parcentega, but was willing to consider allowing Subarea G to remain at Medium. Chairman McNiel stated GhaC because Subarea F ie ndjncent to MLl liken Avenue and freeway access while Subarea G 10 adjacent to Low Mediumr h¢ would be more willing to allow Subarea F to remain Medium. Planning Commission Minu tee -~- October 9, 199: 3~ Commissioner Ch it lea felt that it would De appropriate for both Sabarese to be reclaseiE led ae Low Medium, ae she wanted [o move in the direction of reducing densities. Conatise loner Valletta stated that, at tae direction of the City Council, the Commies ion was trying to lower the density and mak¢ good planning sense. She felt it would not be bad planning to have both Subareas reclaes if led to Low Metl ium. She ea id that south of Subarea F i¢ Low Medium transit ionln9 to Low and Low Medium is located across the stceet. chairman McN iel felt that was a valid argument. Motion: Roved by Ch it iae, seconded 6y Valletta, to recommend issuance of a Nagai ive Declaration and adopt tae reaolut ions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 91-03 (EUbacea Fi and Victocia Planned Community Amendment 91-03 (Subarea F) changing the land use designation to Low xed ium. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERSt CNITIEA, MCNIEL, VALLfiTTB NOES: COMMI SSI0NE0.5: MELCNEA, TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMMISSIONEAS; NONE -cnrr led Motion: Moved by Ch Ltiea, seconded Dy Valletta, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adopt the reeolut ions recommending npproval of General PLan Amendment 91-03 (Subarea Gj and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03 (Subarea G) chanq ing the land uea designation to Low xedium. Mat ion Carr Eltl by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, NCNIEL, VRLLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: HELCHSR, TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMMIS SIONEAS: NONE -carried i + • w Ge al Plan ~1 ,a d Amendme t 91-63 IS 6areae H and I},_a d Victoria Pia ed C mmun'C Am Od ant 91-03 fS b reas H and It: chairman HcNiel stated start's recommendation was teat both subareas be cezonetl to Low Nedium. He said Mr. Lague indicatetl a preference rant the area .~ remain Medium, but raqu¢eted the ability to utilize 4,000 square Eoot lots if qi, the area were redeeignated ae Gow Medium. ' carom lea loner Valiette stated chat Nr. Luque had Lndicated he wou id like tc build homes similar to iha homes to Che west of Subarea H. She fe1C the existing homes ate on extremely small lots and tear onto other lots. She did ~'~~ not want to ese more such homee and felt they would not be attractive in she years to came, She ea id the City had race lved several letters from people ~;. .--; Planning Comm lee ion Minutes -y1r- OctoDar 4, 1991 4 ~7 Lndisat ing they felt the area ie impacted with single family homes built one on top of another with nc yard or parking apace. Commissioner Chitiea felt such issues could be handled at the Design Review level. Commissioner Vnllette felt that direction could be given on types of houeinq the Commiae ion would like to see in the future. She felt that Low Medium would make good planning eenee. Commissioner Toletoy egrBed on Subarea H. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Mr. Luque stated the lots acroee the street were 3,000 square foot lots and he was now propoeinq 4,000 square foot lots on 50 x SO foot lots. Chairman McNial again closed ens public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea agreed with Low Medium. She felt the 6,000 square foot lot requeet was a separate ieeue which the Commission could not consider at this time. Commieeion¢r Meleher aeketl if the Low Medium density would allow development of 4,500 square foo[ lots. Mr. Buller responded that the Low Medium de¢Lgnation would allow 4,000 square toot lots. Comm ice inner Toletoy did not wish to eee any more of the crowding each as on the 3,000 equace foot lots. Commissioner Me lcher agreed. He was not aura that 4,000 equate foot lots in Che conf iguratLon mentioned would be any more acceptable beceua¢ it would add 20 feet to Che depth of the lot which would provide either a front or a back yard, but not bath. Ne thought perhaps 40-foot by 100-foot lots may be more acceptsb le beceua¢ it would provide both Eton! and back yards for the homes. Commieeioner Toletoy felt that apace ie important. Motion: Moved Dy Chitiea, seconded 6y Me lc her, to recommend Leeuance of a Negative Declaration end adopt the resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 91-03 (SUba[ea H) antl Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03 (Subarea H) changing the land uee deetgnation to Low Medium. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, NCNIE L, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Planning Commlaelon Mtnute¢ -~ Octuhe[ 9, 199: 3SZ Commissioner Toletoy agreed with staff's recommendation regarding Subarea I. Commies inner Melcher stated he was not opposed in principal Dut the Bite is bordered by a major arterial and a major nrt erial of the future ana he felt it would be similar to the sire at Baee Line and Milliken in terms of traffic. He wontleretl if eomathing shoals be done at the Medium level at least along the edges of the property. Commissioner Toletoy felt there was quite a difference between Subareas E and A and i. He said Sabarese E and A are bordered by a perk and have commercial across ibe street. He said Subarea I tloee not have a park or commercial development adjacent. Commieeioner Valletta star ed that Milliken will have an offramp tram the freeway but Rochester will not. Chairman McNiel aeketl if attached unite can be buLlt in the Low Metlium deeignat ion. Mr. Buller reepontled affirmatively. Commies inner Valletta stated there are attached unite interepereed in the area across Day Creek Boulevard north of the railroad tracks. Chairman McNiel stated that in the lower deneit ie9 with the attached product, more open apace ie provided. Motion: Moved Dy Ch Ltiea, seconded by Val lette, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adopt the reeolutione recommentling approval of General Plan Amendment 91-03 (Subarea I( antl Vrctorie Planned Community Amendment 91-03 (Subarea I(~ changing the land use designation to Low Medium. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNIT IEA, MCNIEL, MELCNER, TOLSTOY VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried • • . • ~ Gene el P1 Land endm nt 91 Subareas C a d and VLC oria Planned co un't dment 91-03 Subar e L and B Chairman McNiel atatec ':hat staff recommended Subarea C be changed Erom Medium High io Medium, Subarea L be Changed from Medium Nigh to Civic/Community (Community Fac ilitLee for the Victoria Planned Community(, and Subarea B be changed from Metlium Nigh to Medium. CommLeeloner Ch It iee felt it made sense to change Subarea L to Civic/Community because of the proposed Eire station u98• She concurred with ataff~s recommendation Eor Subarea c to be changed to Medium. Pl anning Commission Minutes -$- October 9, 159: 353 Conunieaioner Vall¢ete agreed Comm ie sinner Helcher questioned if the Commission should defer the decision on Subarea C to the City Council ae the City had just purchased the land based on existing zoning for use in conjunction with the affordable housing eCrategy. Hr. Bu 11er felt the Council would like to hear the Flanning Commise ion's thoughts r¢garding the land use. Hr. Henderson stated staff had contacted the City'a redevelopment staff and no objection was reieed to the recommended Medium deaignet ion. Commiaei oner Tolatoy felt that Hetlium denslty makes eenee. Hs said if the housing were affordable, that would be better because there would be leee crowded conditions. He did not feel affordable housing shoo ld necessarily equate with a high density project. commissioner vallette thought the city Council'a position is to treat affordable housing no different than other housing. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Tolatoy, to recommend issuance of a Negative Oeclazetion end adopt the resolutions recommending approval of Oen¢ral Plan Amendment 91-D3 (Subarea C) and Victoria Plannatl Community Amendment 91-03 (Subarea C) changing the land use deeignat ion to Medium. Motion carried by the follow[ng voce: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CH IT SEA, HCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSI ONEAB: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Hotiont Movetl by Toletoy, aecondetl by Vallstt e, to recommend leeVance of a Negative Declaret ion and adopt the reeolutione recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 91-03 (Subarea L) and Victoria Planned Community A:mxndmertt 91-03 (Subarea L) changing the land use designfltion to Civ icJcommunity and community Faciltt iee, respect lvely. Hotlon carried by the following vote: RYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHIT TEA, MCNIEL, MELCHEA, TOLSTOY vALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERSt NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carded Chairman HcNlel asked what vas ie to the west oP Subaree B. Mr. Bu lier responded thet a mint-storage le located there. Commissioner va llatte agreed with staff's recommendation based on the adjacent uses. Planning Commieelan Mlnutee -'X- October 9, 1591 3 s~f Motion: Moved by To letoy, seconded by Chitiea, to recommend iesu once of a Negative Declaration and adapt the reeolut ions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 91-03 (Subarea B) and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03 (SUDarea H) changing the land use designation to Medium. Motion carried Dy the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHIT IfiA, TOLSTOY VALLETTE NOES: COlHiISSIONERS: MCN IEL, MELCNER ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONB -carrled Commieeioner Melcher felt the abutting conditions warrant Leaving the parcel at Medium High. Chairman McNiel agreed with Commieeioner Melcher. C oral P1 L d Ame dm t 91-03 (S ba ee J d R1 d Vi i P C 't Am dment 91-03 (S parses J d Rl: Chairman McNiel etnted that Mr. Luque cequeeted that Subarea J remain Medium while e[aff recommended a redeeignetion to Low Medium. He questioned if Victorln Park Lane will eventually be Du ilt io the south of Subarea J. CommieeLoner Valletta stated ii would. Chairman McNiel eteted there would be Low Medium to the south across Victoria Park Lane, Day Creek Boulevard to the enet, a Southern California Edison corridor tc the whet, and Subarea K to the north, which et off wne recommend ing remain Medium. commissioner Chitiea agreed with etaf f'e recommendation to Low Medium because she Eelt Subarea K would make a good traneiiion. Motion: Moved by Toletoy, seconded by chit tea, io recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adapt the resolutlona recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 91-03 (SUberea J) and Vletoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03 (Subarea J) changing the land use designation to Low Medium. Motion carrled 6y the following vote: AYES: COMM ISSIONEAS: CNITIEA, MELCNER, TOLSTOY VALLETTfi NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Chelrman McNiel felt Ghat It would be better to master plan Subareas J and H ae one large project. Planning Cammiee tan Minutes -Z'S- October 9, 1991 3SS Motion: Moved 6y He lcher, seconded by Chitiea, to recommend denial of General Plan Amendment 91-03 (Subarea K) and Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03 (Subarea R). Hot ion carried by the following vote: AYES: COlHfI SSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIELr MELCHERr TOLSTOY VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Gene a Plan Land a ant S e n d anned Community Amendment 91-03 1SUbareae H and D1: Commissioner Chitiea felt the change to Commercial was appropriate. commissioner Tole[ay quasi Toned if Subareas D and M should not both be Commercial because of the irregular nnture of Subarea M. Mr. Buller stated that staff had corked witD a potential developer on a concept plan and it was felt it was important to have commercial acceea for Ghe shopping center on the street separating Subareas R and M. Me said if Subarea D wns then added to Subarea M, the commercial parcel would be too deep to function well ae a commerctal site. Commissioner Melcher asked if the shapes Dad been discussed with the developer. Mr. Buller responded affirmatively and stated the deve lopar had found a potential major user for the site. commies Toner Tolstoy stated roar there are generally tleeign prob lame when there are irregularly shaped lots. Commieeioner Chiiiee supported the proposal for Subarea M Not loo: Moved by Valletta, seconded by Melcher, to recommend ieauanee of a Negative Declarstion and adopt the reeolutione recommending approval of General Plen Amendment 91-03 (Subarea M) end Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03 (SUberee M) changing the land use daei9nation to Neighborhood Commettlal and Village Commercial, respectively. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIELr MBLCHER, TOLSTOY VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Cheitman McNiel stated a change to Medium would tie the use to Subarea K. Planning Commission Mlnutee -'AF October 9, 1991 3 Slv Chairman MeN iel elated a change to Medium would tie the use to Subarea R• Mt. Fuller stated it would make Subarea R workable. Motion: Roved by Helcher, seconded by Chitiea, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declatntion and adopt the resolutions recommending approval of General Plen Amendment 91-03 (Subarea D) and victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03 (Subarea D) changing the land use designation to Metlium. Motion carried by Che following votes AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCNER, TOLSTOY VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 'carried Commissioner Melchor suggested chat the remaining public heeringe 6e opened for the purposes of continuing the balance of the agenda to the next public meeting. O. SESSNENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.12.040 regarding bicycle storage requirements and Section 17.OB.070 regarding trail maintenance requirements. Staff recomsende issuance of a Neget ive Declaration. P. ENVIRON NTAL ASSfiSSHENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIPIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-OS - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Part III, Sect ton IV.F regarding bicycle storage requirements. Staff recommends ieeuanca of a Negative Declarer ion. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Helcher, seconded 6y Chttiea, to continue Environmental Aaeesemen[ end Development Code Amendment 91-04 and Env ironmenenl Assessment and Industrial Atea Specific Plan Amendment 91-OS to October 23, 1991- Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONfi -carried • ~ • x ~ R. HEFTING WITH COMMISSIONERS - (Orel Report) Motion: Moved by Mslcher, seconded by Chit lea, to continue the item to October 23, 3991. Mo[lon carried by Che following vote: Planning Commission Minutes -$- October 9, 1991 35~ RESOLUTION N0. ~'~ 3 5~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COON IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA A~ THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (E-14 DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) FOR 10.0 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLIAEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-691- 01. A. Recit ale. (i) On April 6, 19E 1, the city of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81-40. (ii) on August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea A, as described in the title of this Reeo lotion. Hereinafter in this Aesolut Son, the subject General Plan Amendment le referred to as ^the appl icaiion." (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Commiealon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application antl following the concluelon of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 91-151 recommending to the Clty Council that the application be approved. iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a tlu ly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequie ilea prior to the adoption of this Reao lotion have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, end resolve ae follows: 1. Th ie Council hereby epeeif Lcally finds Chat all of the facts set forth in the Rec Lt al e, Part A, of this Reeolut ion are true and correct. 2. Eeeed upon substantial evidence presented to thle Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral at aft report e, together with public teat imony, this Council hereby specifically Einde ae follows: (a) The application applies to 10.0 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Ea6e Line Aoad and Milliken Avenue and is presently undeveloped. Se id property is currently designated Med lum-High Resident Lel (14-29 dwelling unite per acre); and 3sg CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 91-03, sUeAREA A - CITY OP A.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (b) TAe property to the north of the subject site is designated Metlium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite par acre) end is undeveloped; the property to the south is tleeignated Neighborhood Commercial and ie developed with a commercial shopping canter under construction; the ptopeTty io the east ie designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per ecre) and is developed with single family residences; and the properly to the we et 18 designated Park and 18 vaceni; and (r) TAU amendment lees-;wf conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the Gensrel Plan and will^provids for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan nntl with related development; and ~A nr)' (d) ThU amentlmentA promote the goal and oDjectivee of the Land Uee Element; and (o) Tha properties located in subarea A of the application are not suitable for Lha uses pernltted Ln the proposed dlstrict.asd_w}e. ..t oropert ias with low~~ d~~~t*_~ land use dsaiq_t ~e berde«_ee_-mow. ...ni.ee- sitEZO-tba-sayY7 and (f) This amendment would not have a •ignlflcant impact on the environment nor on the eurrcunding properties as evtdencsd by the findings and conclusions listed in Porte I and II of the Initial study; and 3. This Council hereby finds thst the project Aas been reviewed and considered In complianes wStA ihs California Environmental Quality Act of 19'10 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Nagetivs Declaration. 4. Beeed upon the findings and conc lueione eet~af~ort~h in paragraphs 3, 2, antl 3 above, this Council reby resolves to epprovs General Plan Amendment 91-03, SuDerea A,p am ~~the Ceneral Plen Land Uee Mep from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) t0 Medium Resident tai (8-14 dwelling units par aers) for 10.0 aerss of land located on the northeast corner of Baee Llne Road and Milliken Avenuo ae shown in ExhlDit "A." Tha Clty Clark shall cart ify to the adoption of this Resolution. r359 RXMISIT •A• OASE LINE ROAD N ORDINANCE NO. (.)-/n7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA A, AMENDING THE VTCTOAIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USB MAP PROM MEDIVM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO M80IUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING VNITS PER ACAS) FOR 10.0 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNEA OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLIREN AVENUE, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-691-01. A. Eecitals. (i) On May 20, 1981, the City of Aencho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Victoria Planned Community through the adoption of Ordinance No. 143. (ii) On August 5, 3991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed en application for Victoria Planned Conmunity Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea A, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Heislnafter in this Ordinance, Lhe subject Victoria Planned Community Amendment Le referred to ae "the application." (iii) On October 9, 1991, tAe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on ehs application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Reeolutlon 91-152 recommending to Lhe City Council that the application be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the Clty Council of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing end concluded eatd hearing prior to the adoption of this ordinance. (v) All legal prarequlnites to the adoption of thin Ordinance nave occurred. e. ordinance. The city council of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains ae follows: I. Tnie council hereby epecltically finds that all of the faces sec forth in the Rec itel e, Pert A, of thL Otdinsnce era true end correct. 2. eased upon substant Lal evidence presented to thi• council during the above-referenced pu611c hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, thin Council hereby specifically finds as follows: ~~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VPCA 91-03, SUBANEA A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA November 20, 1991 Page 2 a) Ths application applies to 10.0 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Base Line Aoad and Milliken Avenue and Ss prssenLly untlevelopetl. said property i• currently tleeignated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre); and b) The property to the north of the subject Bite i• designated Medium Residential (e-14 dwelling unite per sere) and is undeveloped; the property to the south i• tlsslgnated Neighborhood CommercLsl and is developed with a con®ercial shopping center under conetruclion; the property to tae east ie designated Medium Residential (e-14 dwelling units per acre) and ie developed with single family residences; and tae property Lo tae we et ie designated Pnrk and Le vacant; entl (c) Thl• amendment dose not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and Victoria Plsnned Community and will provide Eor development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related tlevelopnent; and (d) This amentlmeni promotes the goals and objectives of the Lend Vee Element; end (e) Tha properties located in 9ubaree A of the application are suitable for the uses permitted Ln the proposed district and ors compatible with existing and adj scant land use tlesignations a evidenced by the location of properties with lower density land use destgnatians bordering the subject site to the east; and (f) This amendment would not have a sLgnlEicant impact on the environment not on Che surrounding pzoperiiss as widenced by the findings and conclusions lieietl Ln Parts I and II of the Initial Study. 3. This Council hereby flnda that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, furtherr tale Council hereby issues a Negat lvs Declaration. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 abover ChL Council hereby approves Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03, 9ubaree A, emending the Vletozla Planned Community Land Use Map from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) to Medium Residential (8-16 dwelling unite per acre) for 10.0 eeree of land located on the northeast corner of Bace Line Road entl Milliken Avenue es shown in Exhibi[ "A. 5. The Mayor shall etgn this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 tlaye after its passage at lens[ once in the Inland vsllev Dall B•l letin, a newspaper of general clrculetion published in the City of Onterlo, California, and clrculsted in tae city o[ Rancho Cucamonga, CaltEOZnla. U~0 Z-- EXHI9IT 'A• A RESOL UTZ RESOLUTION NO. 9I 3 -J CUCAMONC ON OF Rl -O3• SUH Cu'IFORS CITY CO ACRE) MTOlU~H10M~ ANENLZNCp THVINCL OENETME CITY O rN~NCS ZNR~~p OWE~O FLANS L CIAT 49~~ N~ UNITS MApT A. R c a a DRT TNEREOp IC APNA ~~ TLANENO ~D SIDE PER OF endc (1) ' Oyl _1q AND 1MAt(ING tment of Lh n APtil 6 (ii a Oaneral P1an9gl' the c ch eralt Plan fAm hte nReaol tl a0 ~ ltlmente hCrtY pofonn foR ao ~[iO° NopProved the e Ran rho 3ya) On ent ie referred trelnaftar 9l -07 Suba o Cu Oamon 1-40. Noa 91 ~15°w~9ngth o nd cted9 1991 t da °the aPPl ratio sot B'iona described an c n.•• t i C (iv1J recoamentlan9 [°4 tgentl °f aaidcetll Public, Commiseton he dubj ect ucamo On °!ty C Public 4eartn °f t ha ve ooc ()the Adopt yd°na duehla ~Reao lut ubllc Che~ Co4n~lpofrCaii nt be apProl~~ionn B. a °jr ~eA• 1 1e9a1 Ptere4uieitee Prior [o inB dnd concluded !said Thee n ~o hereby findON,tletatRS10~• the C the dtlop[i°n °f this Reaoluti Ono ne, tt forth in l Th ie entl reaol ve ae°il of the Lhe Recitals °nQ11 hereb fo11°we; Ctty of Ranc [hd above2. Based part A °f tlPeaciflcdlly fl ho Cucem°n9a es do Pert te1 staff renC°d4 PUb duba[an[i Reaol4tion natde that all of ficallY finds pee tfo LOBether in4 on; NOVCe Present Lrue dnd core et acts se[ u,~de el [h aids (of The aPPl ws, with Public bteat mo a991~[ to°3 ud nril Burin l14-1q tl°Patl. Sal Ba ee Line ice tion a Y' th ie C,o4 in4 writ 9 welling 4n atS roper[y Roe d, west lots t° 1B 3 ncll hereby Par acre); and ran [lY tlegi9nated k lane and aalocaied cn Me um-M+Bh Rea recently iden[+al ,~..~._ ^_ ,~~ y -,,.~_ ...~ CITY COVNC IL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 91-03, SUBAREA B - CITY OF R.C. November Z0, 1991 Page 2 (b) Tae property to the natih of the rubjact •ite, past [he Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, io deeignaietl Low Ree idential (2-6 dwelling unite per acre) and ie developed with single family rerideneee; the property to the south ie designated High Residential (26-30 dwelling unite per acre) and ie tlevelopsd with an existing, nonconforming indue[rial builtling used to protluce wine vinegar; the propert lee to the eert era designated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwolling unite per acre) and Neighborhood Commercial and are developed wi[h a contlominium project under conatruetion and a commercial shopping center; and the property to the west i• tleeignated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwolling unite prr Acre) and Se developed with a reczeat LOnal vehicle calf-storage facility; and (c) Thl• amandmrnt dooa not conflict with the Lend Usa Policies of the General Plan and will provide for tlsvelopment, within the district, in a manner coneiatent with the General Plan end with ralatrd tlwalopmrnt; and (d) Thie amendment promwtes the gosh and object Sues of tae Lantl Uee Element; and (e) Tae properties located in Subarea R of the application ere suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed dietrlet end are compatible with exist inq and adj scant land use designations as evidenced 6y the location of propert Les with lower dendty land use deslgnstione bordering tae subject site to the north; antl (f) Tair amendment would not have a •ignificent impac[ on the environment nor on the eurroundLng properties as evidenced by the flntlinge and conclU aione listed Ln Parts I and II of the Initial Study; and 3. This Council hereby finds that Cho project her been reviewed and cone idered in compliance with the California Envlro;unsntal Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Neelarat ton. 9. Based upon the findings and conclusions ast forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 ebova, this CouneLl hareay resolve to epprova cenrral Plan Amendment 91-03, Subersa E, amrnding thr Csnersl Plan Land Vse Map from Medium-High Residential (L4-T4 tlwrlling unite par acre) to Medium Reridential (8-14 dwallLng unlt• per acre) foc 19.3 ecros of land located on the north eitle of Beee Line Road, west of Victoria Perk Lens ae shown in Exaibit "A." 5. The city Clerk shell certify to the adoption of this Rsealution 3bs ,_ HIGHLAN A VENUE ~~ _. . _, M •D O O c ° v a --- I~ c ~ ~ c W __J~ ~' _ ~ V~f~^ p,"'r ~~~ WW~ 0 ('~ y f J O (`,' ~ r'I ® ~ ' ~ ® ~ I ~ ~~ ~J ®®® I I I D f W EXHIBIT 'A" ORDINANCE NO. YZD AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA Br AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE MAP PROH MEOIUN-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (16-24 UHELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 19.3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, ANO HARING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-I4 AND 15. A. Recit ale. (i) On Hay 20, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Victoria Planned Community through the adoption of Ordinance No. 143. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Victorle Planned Community Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea B, ae described Ln the title of thin ordinance. Nerslnafter Ln this Ordinance, the subject Victoria Planned Community Amendment in referred to ae "the applicai ion.^ (iii) on October 9, 1991, the Planning Commies ion of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution 91-160 recommending to the City Council that tha application be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded se id hearing prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. fv) All legal prerequieitee prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. 9. Ord Lnnnce. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ortlaina ae follows: 1. This Council hereby epecif Lcally finds that all of the facts set Eoreh in the Recital e, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon eubetantial evidence preeentetl to this Counc Ll during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20r 1991, lac lading written and oral staff reports, together wi[h public teetLmony, this Council hereby specifically finds ee follows: (a) The application applies to 19.3 ecra• of land located on the no[th side of Beaa Line Road, west of Victoria Pe[k Lane and Le presently undeveloped. Se id property ie currently designated Ned ium-High Ree id ent:al (14-24 dwelling unLt• per acre); and 3l0 ~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VPCA 91-03, SUBAREA B - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 3991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site, past the Southern Pacif is Railroad right-ot-way, is tleeignated Low Aeaidential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) and is developetl wish single family reeidencee; the property to the south ie tlesignaietl High Reeitlential (24-30 dwelling unite per acre) and ie developed with an exieting, nonoonforminq industrial building used to produce wine vinegar; the properties to the east are deaignated Medium-Nigh Aeaidential (14-24 dwelling unite par acre) end Village Commercial antl are developed wLth a contlominium project and a commercial shopping center; and the property to the west is deaignated Medium-High Aeeident ial (14-26 dwelling unite per acre) and le developed with a recreational vehicle storage facility; and (c) Thie amendment does not conflict with the Land Vee Policies of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community and will provide for development, within the dietzict, in a manner coneieient with the General Plan antl with related dove lapment; antl (d) Thie amendment promotes Ghe goals and obj actives of the Land Uae Element; and (e) Tha properties located in SuDacea a of Lhe application are suitable Eor the uses pexmittad in the proposed district and era romper Lb le with exist inq and adjacent land use deeignatione as evidenced by the locni ion of proper[ tee with lower density land use tleaignatione bordering the subject a ire to the north{ antl (f) This amendment would not have a significant impact on the env ironmeni nor on the surrounding propart tee ae evitlanced 6y the Eindinge and cone lueiona listed in Porte I and II of the Initial Study, and 3. Thie Count ll hereby finds that the project het been reviewed and coneideretl in compliance with the Cal Lfornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, thle Council Hereby issues a Neget ive Declaration. 4. Eased upon the findings and coot lotions set forth Ln paragraphs 1, 2, end 3 above, thle Council hereby epprovee Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03, Subarea B, amend inq the Victoria Planned Community Land Uee Map from Medium-High Residential (14-24 duelling unite per acre) to Medium Residential (e-14 dwelling unite per acre) Eoc 19.3 octet of land located on the north aide of Baee Line Road, weer of Vtetoria Park Lane as shown !n Exhibit "A." 5. Tha Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall eau ee the same to be pu611ehed within 15 days after ire passage at least once in the Inl d V lieu 0 11 B llei'n, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, end circulated Ln the City of Rancho Curemonge, California. 3 b8 EXHIBIT •A' RESOLUTION NO. Q/ ~ ~~ W A RE80LUTIOp OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA C, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-16 DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) FOR 21.77 ACRES OF LANG LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OP BASE LINE ROAD AND THB PUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAILING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OP 227-091-18 AND 19, 227-091-20 THROUGH 22, AND 227-091-43. A. Recitals. (i) On April 6, 1981, the Ciiy of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Osneral Plnn through the adoption of Resolution No. e1-40. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Eiletl an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea C, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter Ln this Resolution, Che subject General Plan Amendment is referred to se "the application.'• (iii) On October 9, 199.1, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 91-163 recommending to the City Council that the application be approved. (iv) on November 20, 1991, the city council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prsrequieitee prior to the adoption of this Reeolut ion have occurred. B. Reno lotion. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, end resolve ae follawe: 1. This Council hereby epecif icelly finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rec Stale, Part A, of this Reeo lotion are true and Correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenestl pu611e hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with pu611c testimony, Chie Council herehy apeciftcally finds as follawe: (a) The epplicat ion applies to 21.77 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Baea Llne Road end the future Dey Creek Boulevard and ie presently undeveloped. Said property ie currently designated Medium-High Res ident iel (14-24 dwelling unite pet acrc)7 end 3~0 CITY COUNCIL A630LUTSON NO. GPA 91-03, SUBAREA C - CITY Op R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to Lhe north of the subject Bite, past the Southern Pacifle RaLlroad right-of-way, ie deeigneied Low-Medium Residential (6-B dwelling unite per acre) and ie undeveloped; the properly to the south is tlesi9neted Commercial and ie vacant; the property to the east is designated Utility CocrLdor and Ls vacant; and the property to the west ie designated utility Corridor end is used for plans storage; and (c) ThL amendment dose not conflict with the Land Vee Policies of the General Plsn and will provide for development, within the dietriet, in a manner eonsletant with the General Plan and with related development; and (tl) Thi• amendment promotes the goals and objectives of Lhe Land Dee Element; and (e) The properties located in Suberoe C of the application are suitable for the uus permitted in the proposed district and are compatible wish existing and adjacent lend use deetgnnt LOn• ae evidenced by Lhe location of properties with lover density land use deeignation• bordering the euDject else to the north; end (f) Thls amendment would net have a significant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced Dy Lhs findinge and co nc luelon• lisGd in Parts I antl II of the initial Study; and 3. Thi• Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and cone itlerad in compliance wish the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, furihar, this Council hareDy issues a Negative Declaration. 4. Eased upon the findinge and conclueione set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, Ghi• Council hereby resolves to approve General Plan Amendment 91-03, subarea c, amending Lhe Gencrel Plan Land U6a Nap from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) to Medium Raeideni sal (8-34 dwellLng units pez acre) for 21.77 acres of lend located on the northwest corner of Bnse Llns Roed and victoria Pack Lane a• shown Ln Exhib i[ "A." 5. The City Clerk shall cart Lfy to the adoption of th le Aeeo lut ion 3l l EXHIBIT 'A" ORDINANCE NO. ~-}~/ AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA C, AMENDING TH8 VSCTOR IA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING VNSTS PER ACRE) TO MEDIVH RESIDENTIAL (8-16 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 21.77 ACRES OP LAND LOCATBO ON THS NORTHNEST CORNER OP BASE LINE ROAD AND THE PUTVRE DAY CREEft BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THER60P - APN: PORTION OP 227-091-18 AND 19, 227-091-20 THROUGH 22, AND 227-091-43. A. Recitals. (i) On May 20, 3981, the City of Anncho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Victoria Plenn9d Community through the adoption of Ordinance No. 163. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application Eor Victoria Planned Community Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea C, ae tlescribed in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Victoria Planned Community Amendment La referred to ae "the application." (ifi) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public Dearing on the application antl following the conclusion of said public heating, adopted Raeolutlon 91-164 recommending to the City Council that the application bs npproved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concludetl said hearing prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. (v) All legal prerequ ie ices prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have ~ec~rred. e. Ortllnanc The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ortlaine ae Ecllowe: 1. This Council hereby epecl£ically finds that all of the facia set forth in the Rec it al e, Part A, of this Ordinance era true end correct. 2. Based upon subetant iel evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral e[atf reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds ae follows: (a) The nppllcation appl iee tc 19.3 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Baes Line ROed and [ha future Dey Creek Boulevard and ie presently undeveloped. Said property ie currently deal9natad Med lum-High Resident ial (14-24 dwelling unite per acre); and 373 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VCPA 91-03, SUBAREA C - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site, past the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, ie designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 tlwelling unite per sera) and ie undeveloped; the property io the south ie designated Regional Related office/Commercial and ie vacant; the property to the east ie designated Utility Corridor and is vacant? and the property to the west ie designated Vtillty Corridor and le used for plant storage; and (c) ThU amendment does not canfliei wish the Land Uea Policies of the General Plan and Vlctaria Planned Community and will provide for development, within the dietr ict, in a mennar consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) Thie amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use filament; and (s) Thw properties located in Subarea C of the application are eu it able for the uwe permitted in the proposed dLtrict and are compatible with existing and edjacan[ land uw designations as evidenced by the location of properties with lower density land use duignstions bordering the subject site to the norin; and (f) TAU emendmsnt would not have n •ignLEieant Upec[ on [he environment nor on the surrounding praperties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Part• I and II of the Initial Stutly; and 3. Thla Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and cone idered in compliance with the California Envirolunsntal Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth Sn paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby epp[ovss Victorle Planned Community Amendment 91-03, Bubarae C, amending the Victoria Planned Community Land Uee Hap Erom Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwell ing unite par acre) to Medium Bee idantial (E-14 dwelling units per acre) for 21.77 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Besa Line Road and Victorle Park Lana ee shown in Ex nib it "A." B. The Mayor shall sign thi• Ordinance and the City Clark shall cauee the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at laser once in the Inland Vellev Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, cal ifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 371 HIGNLAN -'- ---' O A - VENUE -- - r - _Q O __ __ . ~M .~ O e v a ---!~ o a ~ c a ~ ~ J • W 68 W _-~ 2 •, •• ~ VIGtONM P1'~F W ~ ~ ~ ~ J I G ` ` I ~ ~® ••~ • •• ' •W •••• I , ~'IO!' N N i i ~_- EXHIBIT "A' RESOLVTION NO. Q/~ /. '"1, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENEHAi. PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 0, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LANG USE HAP FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO NEOIUH RESIDENTIAL (B-16 DWELL TNG UNITS PHR ACRE( FOA 7.895 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET ANO 1,300 FEET SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ON THS WEST SIDE OF THE FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULSVARD, AND HARING FZNOINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OP 227-021-03 AND 13. A. R¢citsl e. (i) On April 6r 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of AeeolutLon No. N1-40. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plen Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea D, ae deecriDetl in the title of thta Reaolut ion. Hereinafter Sn this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment Se referred to ae "the applicat ion.^ (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Commies ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a tluly noticed public hearing on the application and following the concluelon of aaitl public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 91-175 recommending to the City Council that the application be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the CLty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a tlu ly noticetl public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequie ites prior Co the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. a. Resolution. NON, THEREPOAE, Che City Council of the CLty of Rancho Cucamonga tlose hereby find, determine, and resolve ae follows: 1. Thle Council hereby specifically [inde that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, PeK A, of this Reaolut ion are true and correct. 2. Based upon 6ubetant ial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referencetl public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together wLth public testimony, thle Council hereby epee if ically finds ea follows: (e) The application applies to 7.895 acres of land locac ed between approximately 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet south of HLghland Avenue on the we et tide of the future Dey Creek Boulevard and ie presencly undeveloped. Said property ie currently tleeignatetl Medium-Nigh Reside nC:a: (14-24 dwelling unite per ncre); and ~7~ CITY COVNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 91-03, SUBAREA D - CITY OP R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (b) Tha property to the north of the subject site, ie designated Ned ium-N Lgh Aealdential (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) and ie undeveloped? the property to the south ie designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) and ie vacant; the property to the east ie designated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) and ie vacant; and the property to the west ie designated Flood Control/Utility Corridor and ie vacant; and (e) Thia amendment does not conflict with the Land Vsa Policies of the General Plan and will provide Eor davelopnient, within the district, in a manner conaletent with the General Plen and with related development; and (d) Thls amenMwnt pronwtea the goals and objectives of the Land Vse Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea D of the appllcat tan are eu treble for the uses permitted Ln the proposed dlstriet and art campaLLDle with existing and adjacent land use designations ae evidenced by the location of properties with the came land use dasignat ions south of the subject site; and (f) This amendment would not have a significant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties a• evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Study? end 3. Thie Council hereby finds Lhat the proj set has been reviewed and considered in compliance with iha CaliEOrnla Envlronmentel Quality Ac[ of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby approves a Negative Declaration. 4. eased upon the findings and eonclueione set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves to approve General Plan Amendment 91-03, SuDares D, amending the General Plan Lend Use Mep from Medium-High Ree Ldential (14-24 dwell Lng units per acre) to Medium Aeeident ial (5-14 dwelling units per acre) far 7.895 acres o£ land located between approximately 1,000 feet and 1,300 [ee! south of Highland Avenue on the west aide of the future Day Creak Boulevard ae shown in EAhlbit "A." 5. Tha Clty CUrk shall certify to the adoption of this Reec lut ion 37 ] EXM181T 'A' ORDINANCE NO. N'7~' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALSFORNIA, APPAOVINO VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA D, AHENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND UEE MAP FROM MED IVM-NIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING VN ITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOA 7.895 ACAEE OP LAND LOCATED BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET AND 1,300 PEBT SOVTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND ON THE WEST SIDE OP THE FUTllRB DAY CREER BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-021-03 AND 13. A. Recitals. (i) On May 20, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Victoria Planned Community through the adoption of Ordinance No. 143. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga fl led an application for Victoria Planned Community Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea D, ae deecrtbed in the title of this Ordinance. xereinafter Ln this Ordinance, the subject Victoria Planned Community Amendment le rafertetl to ae ^the application." (iii) On October 9, 3991, the Planning Commission of the City of Aaneho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and followLng the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Reeolut ion 91-176 recommending to the Clty Council that the application be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Cou ncLl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notlcetl public hearinq and concluded eaitl hearing prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. (v) All legal prerequleltee prior io the adoption of this Ordinance have accutted. B. ordinance. The City Council of the C1[y of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: 1. Thle Council hereby spec ificelly finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitalar Part A, of this Ordinance are true and coz[ect. 2. Based upon eubetential evidence preeented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, Lncluding written and oral staff report •, together with public teetlmonyr this council hereby apecif ically finds ee follows: 3?q CITY COUNCIL DRD INANCE NO• VPCA 91-07, SUBAREA D - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (a) Tha application applies to 7.695 acre of land ioc died between approximately 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west aide of the future Day Creek Boulevard and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently des i9nated Medium-High Re6 idential (14-24 dwelling unite par acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject Bite, ie designated Medium-High Residential (14-Z4 dwelling units per acre} and is undeveloped; the property Go the south ie designated Hedium Re9idenC Sal (6-14 dwelling unite per acre) and ie vacant; the property to the east ie designated Medium-Nigh Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant; and the property to the west 18 des i9nated Utility Corridor and ie vacant; and (e) Thie amendment does not conflict with the Land Vsa Polic iee of the cenaral Plnn and Viceocia Planned community and will provide for development, within the diettict, in a manner conaietent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) Thie amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (a) Rae properties located Ln Subarea D of the applieat tan are suitable for the uses permitted in Gha proposed dLstrict and are compatible with existing antl adj scant land use designations as evidenced by the location of properties with the same land use designations south of the subject site; and (f) This amendment would not have a eignif Scant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties ae evidenced by the findings and coot lueione listed in Parts I and II of tae Initial Study; and 3. Thie Council aereby finds that the project has been reviewed and cone idered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 4• eased upon the find Loge and conclueicne set forth in paragraphs 1, Z, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Vittorio planned Community Amendment 91-03, Subazaa D, amending Ghe vLctaria Planned community Land Use Map from Hedium-Nigh Rea identlal (14-Z4 dwelling units par acre) <o Medium Residential (e-14 dwelling units per 4c re) for 7.895 acres of land located between approximately 1,000 Eee[ and 1,300 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west aide of the future Oay Creek Boulevard ae shown In Exh ib Lt "A." 5, The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the Ciey Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Vallev oaily Bulletin, a newspaper of general cLrculaG ion publie had in the City of Ontar ic, catiforn ia, and circulated in the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, Cnl ifornla. 3Bo W L t O t f W EXHIBIT 'A' RESOLUTION NO. 9~l 3~V A RESOLUTION OF TXB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03r SVHAREA E, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MED IVN AE6IDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) YOR 30.1 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILLI REN AVENUE SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND MAXING FINDINGS IN SllPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-691-01. A. Rec itale. (i) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rnneho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. e1-40. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application far Genetal Plan AmenOmen! No. 91-03, Subarea 8, ae described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Aeaolutionr the eubj act General Plan Amendment ie referred to a• "ihe application." (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Commission of the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the sppllcat ion and following the conclueLan of eeid pub lie heeringr adopted Aeeolution No. 91-153 recommending to the City Ccuncil ihnt the application be denied. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed puDllc hearing and cant laded eeid hearing priror to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Aeaolut ion have occurred. e. Aeeolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve ae follows: 1. This Council hereby epee if ically Einde that all o[ the facts sec forth in the Recltal0, Yart A, of Lhie Aeeolution era true and correct. 2. Based upon eubstantial evidence presented to this council du rang the above-referenced public hearing on Novembe[ 20, 1991, Lncluding writ<en and oral staff ceporte, together with public testimony, this Council hereby epeciE ically finds ae follows: (a) The npplication applies to 10.1 acres of lend located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue south of the Southern Pnc if lc Railroad righc- of-way and ie presently undeveloped. said propeccy Le currently deaiq nacee Medium Residential (8-14 dwell inq unite per acre); end 38 z CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 91-03, SUBAREA E - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to Lhe north of the subject site, poet the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, ie designated Low Aeeidential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) and ie developed with single family resldencesi the property !o Lhe south i• designated Medium-High Aasldential (16-26 dwelling unite per acre) and Le vacant; the property Lo the east is designated Low- Medium Aeeitlential (4-N dwelling unite par acre) and is developed with single Family reeitlencee under eonetruciion; and the property to the west ie designated Park end ie vacant; and (c) Thi^ amendment conflicts with the Land Vse Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development, within the district, in a manner coneieisni with the caneral Plan and with ieleied development; and (d) Thie amendment dose not praoota the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The properties located !n SuDaraa 8 of the application are not witaDla foz the ueu permlttal in the proposal dLtrict and era not compatible Mith existing and adjacent lend uw designations a widsneal by the location of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-ot-way to the north and the propart tee' close proxlmiLy to the intareeetion of Milliken Avenue and Naas Lina Road, which era major artsriaL; and (f) This amendment would not have a significant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as avitlanced by the tindinge and conclusions listed in Parts I end II cE the Initial Study; end 3. Thie Council heraDy finds that the project has barn reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Envlronmantel puallty Act of 1970 and, further, this council hereby ieeuea n Negative Oeelaration. 4. eased upon the flndLngs and conclusions sat forth in persgraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, Lhie Council hereby resolves to deny General Plan Amendment 91-03, Subarea S, a request to amend the 6ansrsl Plan Land Use Map lrom Netlium AeeidenL sal (8-10 dwelling units per acre) to Gow-Hallam Ruldsniial (4-e dwelling unite per acre) Eor 10.1 scree of land located on the seat side of Milliken Avenus south of the Southern Pacific Aai lroed right-of-way as shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The city Clerk shall certify tc the adoption of thin Aeeolution. 3B3 ~i to. ~1 •~t al ~ ,za~noae. ~~nata'`bt. ytth •a L we~~ ~5 o c, j tha ,y n a ° of ae 't rx_ EXMISIT •A' RESOLUTION NO. 9~~359 A RESOLUTION OF 2HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAHONGA, CALIFOPNIAr DENYING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA E, A REQUBST TO AMEND THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND VSE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (E-14 OWBLLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-a DWELLING VNITS PER ACRE) FOR 10.1 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILLIREN AVENUE SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RICHT-OP-WAY, AND MAEING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-693- 01. A. Aecita le. (1) On May 20, 1981, the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Victoria Planned community through the adoption of ordinance No. 143. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an appllcat Lon for Victoria Planned Conmunity amendment No. 92-03, Subarea E, ae described Ln the title of thin Reaolution. Mereinefter in this Reaolution, the subject Victoria Planned CommunLGy amendment i• referred to ne "the application." (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning CammLeion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed publtc hearing on the nppl scat ion and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 91-156 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the city Council of the City of Raneho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded enid hearing prior to the adoption of thi• Reaolution. (v) All legnl prerequ ieites prior to the adoption of this Reaolution have occurred. B. Re so lUtioh. NOW, TMEREPORE, the City Council of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This CouncLl hereby specifically finds that ell of the facts set forth in the Recitela, Part A, of this Raaolution are true and correct. 2. eased upon subetant Lal evidence presented to thL council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with publtc test lmony, thLe Council hereby specifically finds ea follows: 38S CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. VPCA 91-03, SVSAREA E - CITY OP R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (a) The application applies to 10.1 scree of land located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue south of the Southern Pacific Railroad rlght- af-way and ie presently undeveloped. Said property is currant Ly designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject Bite, past the Southern Pacific Railroad right-o[-way, is designated Low Rnn ldential (2-4 dwelling unite pez acre) and ie developed with single family reaidsncee; the property to the sough le designated Medium-High Residential (16-24 dwelling unite per acre) and i• vscani; Lhe property to !hn east i• dwigntisd Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and i• developed with single family residences under construction) and the property to Us west le designated Park and 1• vacant, end (c) Thle amendment conflicts with the Land Uea Policies of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community and will not provide for developments within the district, in a manner conslstnnt wish the General Plan and wish related development) and (d) Thi• amendment dose not promote the goals and objectives of the Lend Vas Element; and (a) The properties located in Subarea 6 of Cha application are not eu ieebls for the uses permitted in the proposed tlUiriCt and are not compat161s with exist leg and adjacent land ues designations as evidenced by the location of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way to the north and the properttee' aloes proximity to the interesctlon of Milliken Avenue and Bate Line Road, which are major atteriale; and (f) Thie amendment would not hove a eignlficant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properiise as evidenced by the findings and canclueions lintnd !n PerLS I and II of the Initial study; end 3. This Council hereby finds that the project hat bean reviewed and considered in complianes with the Callfotnla 6nvlronnwntal Quel lty Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby Seeune a Negative Osclaration. 4. eaestl upon the findings and conclusions eat forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, thin Council hereby reeolvsn to deny Victoria Planned community Amendment 91-03, Subarea E, emending the Victoria Planned Community Land use Hap from Medium Rao itlsnt iel (H-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Ree idential (4-S dwelling unite per acre) for 10.1 acres o£ land lacatetl on the tent aide of Milliken Avenue south of the 6ouGhsrn Pacific Railroad right-of-way es nhown in Exhibit ^A.^ 5. Thn City Clerk shall certify to the adoptlan of this Raeolutlon 3B6 EXHI9IT 'A' RESOLUTION NO. L]'/. ~ O A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT COUN L OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFO A GENERAL PLAN AIUd1R)MENT 91-03, SUBAREA P RND#NO THE GENERAL PLAN I.ANO VS8 NAP FROM NEDIVM REBIDENTIAL (8-16 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) FOR 18 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE BAST SIOE OF NILLIREN AVENUE BETWEEN VICTORIA PARR LANE AND RENYON WAY, AND MAI(ZNG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OP 227-011-17. A. Recitals. (i) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Reaolution No. e1-40. (ii) On Auquat 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea F, ea described in the title of this Reaolution. Mars Lnefter in thla Reaolution, the subject General Plan Amendment Sa referred io as ^the application." (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Coamisslon of the CLty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of enid public hearing, adopted Reeolut ion No. 91-155 recommending to the City Council that the spplicat ion be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public nearing and concluded acid hearing prior to the ndoption of thte Reeolut ion. (v) All legal prerequ ieitee prior to Chs adoption of this Reeolut LOn have occurred. B. Reaolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the CLty Council of Che City of Rancho Cucamonga dose hereby Eind, determine, and resolve es follows: 1. Thle council hereby epeclfieally finds tnet all of the facts eat forth in the Recitals, Part A, Of thLe Reeolut ion ere true and correct. 2. Based upon eubetant Lal evidence presented to thin Council during the above-referenced public nearing on November 20, 1991, Lnc lading written and oral staff report e, together with public test lmony, thi• Council hereby epecif ieally finds es fo llowa: (a) The app]LCetion applies to 18 acra• of land located on the east Bide of Milliken Avenue between Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Wey and ie presently undeveloped. Said propnrty i• currently designetsd Medium Residential (8-34 dwelling unii0 per acre); and 388 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 91-V3, SUBAREA F - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page ] (b) The property to the north of the subject efts, ie designated Neighborhood Commercial and Se developed with a commercial shopping center under conetructlon; the property to the south is designated Low-Medium Reeide,:tiel (6-8 dwelling unite per acre) and is developed with single family ree idence6; the properties to the east are designated Low-Nadi um Residential (4-E dwelling unite per acre) and Patk and era dsve loped with aingle family residences and the park site Ls vacant; and the property to the wear ie designated Low-Medium Residential (4-E dwelling unite par sere) and ie developed with aingle family residenceeJ and (c) Thi• emends~nt asw-;mC conflicLSwith the Land Uas Policies Of the General Plan and will~provida for developswnt, within the district, in a manner cone Latent with the General Plan and with related development; end decs nab (d) This amandmentA promotex the goals and objecLiva• of the Land Uae Element; and (e) The properties located in Subarea F of the application are suitable for the aces permitted in tN proposed dLtrictj--~ --- le use duignnt Lon• (f) Thie amendnwnt wculd not have a •igniticant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed Ln Parts I end II of the Initial Study) and 3. Thie Council hereby finds that the project has bean reviewed and coneideted in complianw with the Cnllfornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Oeclaratlon. 4. Eased upon tM findings and conclwions Nt forth in pazagrephe 1, 2, and 3 above, thin ccu cil hereby resolves to 4i Genernl Plan Amendment 91-03, subarea F,,°a~t~e General Plan Lend Vse Map Erom Metlium Reg idential (e-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low-MSdium Ru idential (4-8 dwelling units par acre) for 1E acres of lend located on the seat aide of Milliken Avenue between Victocie Park Lane and Kenyon Nay a• shown in Exhibit "A." The City Clark shall cezt Lfy to the adoption of this Rasoluticn. (~ EXINSIT •A• lASE LINE NOAD N ORDINANCE NO. ~73 AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMVNITY ANENOHENT 91-03, SUEAAEA F, AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMVNITY LAND VSE MAP FROM MEOIVM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-lIEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 18 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST EIDE OF MILL IICEN AVENVE BETWEEN VICTORIA PARR LANE AND RENYON WAY, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP - APN: PORTION OP 227-011-17. A. Recitals. (i) On May 20, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved th¢ enactment of the Victoria Planned Community through the adoption of Ordinance Nc. 143. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Victoria Planned Community Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea P, ae described in the title of this ordinance. Hereinafter Ln thi^ Ordinance, the subject Victoria Planned Community Amendment Se referred to as "the application." (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Commlee ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the coneluaion of said pub lie hearing, adopted Resolution 91-156 recommending to the City Council that the application be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the Clty of Raneho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded aaitl hearing prior to the adoption vE thin Ortllnanee. (v) All Legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinanc Tha city Council of the City of Rancho cucemonga hereby ordains follows: 1. Thin Council hereby epeciELCaliy Einda that all of the facie net forth in the Recitnla, Part A, of this Ordinance ere true and correct. 2. Based upon aubetant Lal evidence presented to this Council during [he above-referenced publ lc hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff report e, Logether with public teat imony, thle Council hereby specifically flnde ae fol Iowa: (a) Tha application applia^ to 1R acres of land located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue between Vlctorin Perk Lana and Kenyon Way and is presently undeveloped. Said property ie curcent ly designated Medium Raeident Lal (8-14 dwelling unite per acre); and 39 z CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VPCA 91-03, SUBAREA F - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site, ie designated Village Commercial and is developed with a cortanercial shopping center under construction; the property to the south is designated Low-Helium Aeeidential (4-B dwelling unite per acre) and ie developed with single family residences; the properties to the east are designated Low-Hedium Resident tai (4-e dwelling unite per acre) and Park and are developed with single family residences and the park site ie vacant; nrd Lhe property io the west is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-e dwelling unite per acre) and Park and ie developed with single family residences; and (c) Thla amendment does noL conflict with the Land Uee Policies of the General Plan and the Victoria Planned Community and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) Thie amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Vee Element; and (e) The properties located In Subarea F of the application are eu treble for the uses permitted in the proposed dLetricC and acs compatible with existing end adjacent land uea designations ae evidenced by the location of properties with LDS eeme land use dasignatione bordering the subject site to the ecuih, west and east; (f) This amendment would not have a significant impact on the environment nor on Che surrounding properties as evidenced by the find tags and conclueione listed in Parts I and II of the Iniiiel Study; and 3. This Council Dereby finds that the project hoe been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 antl, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declerat ion. q. Based upon Lhe findings and conclucion• set forth Ln paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03, SuDerea P, emending the Victotle Planned Community Land Uee Map from Nedlum Resident ial (8-1q dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Peeidentiel (4-E dwelling unite per acre) for 18 acres of land located on the east aide of Mi lltken Avenue between Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way ae shown in Exhibit ^A." E. The Mayor shall sign this Ortlinance and the City Clerk shall cause the Game to be published within 15 days nftet its passage at leaeC once in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin, a newepeper of general circulation published in Che Clty of Ontario, California, and circulated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal iforn ie. 3~3 EXMI~IT 'A• R830LUT ION NO. Q': s~~I A RESOLUTION OP THE CI Y N L OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA G~ 17iG GENERAL PLAN LAND VSE NAP PROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (5-14 DWELLING VNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-NEDTUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING VNITS PEA ACRE) FOA 11.57 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF AENYON WAY AND WOODRUFF PLACE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OP 227-011-26. A. $¢citals. (i) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plnn through the adoption of Resolution No. 81-40. (Si) On Augusi 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Genarel Plen Amendment No. 91-03, SuDarsa c, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in thin Resolution, the subject General Plnn Amendment Se referred to av "the nppllcat ion," (iii) On October 9, 1991, the planning Commiasicn of the Clty cE Rancho Cueamwnga conducUd a duly noticed public hearing on tM application and following ihs conclusion of void public hearing, adopted Aaso lotion No. 91-157 zsoomovnding to the City Council that the application be npproved. (iv) On November 2D, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongn conducted a duly noticed public hearing and eonclutled said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) A11 legal prerequieitee prior to the adop[lon of this Revolution have occurred. e. Revolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, daGrmine, and resoles as follows: 1. This Council hereby epeci[lcally finds that all of the facto see forth in the Rec stale, Part A, of this Resolution are true end correct. 2. Saved upon substantial vv idmce prevented to thiv Council durLng the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and ornl staff reports, together with public testimony, this council hereby epecif ically find^ a• follows (a) The application applies to 11.87 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Kenyon Ney end WOadruft Plnce and i• presently undeveloped. Said property i• currently designated MedLum Rvaidentiel (8-14 dwelling unity per acre): and 3as CITY COUNCSL R650LUTION NO. GPA 91-03, SVBAAEA G - CITY OP A.C. November 20. 1991 Psge 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject Bite is designated Civic/community and ie vacant; the properties to the eouih are designated Park and school and are vacantt the property to the seat ie designated Low-Medium Aeeitlentlal (4-8 dwell in9 unite per acre) and i• developed with single tamtly reeidencea; and the property to the wear Se designated Neighborhood Commercial and is developed wish a conmercial chopping center Mndar construction; and (c) Thl• ementl~nt deee-++e! conflict with the Land Uea Policies of the Canerel Plan and wil l~provitle for development, within the district, in a manner consLteni with the csneral Plan and with related development; and ~t.v h' (d) Thi• amondnwent^pramobK the goal^ and Objectives of the Land Use element; and (e) The properties located in subarea G of the application are ,lo~' eu Stable for rho uses psrmitiad in the propOeod district)patlbie wit~,31 'x*ry~cti~led ~-`~.^.aO_~".•- _ ____ w.,_.,a~ ~^c~t1CM1- O t^.Sli a-•t ~~ (f) Thi• amendment would not have • •ignlflcant impset on the anviranmsnt nor on the surrounding propertiu ea evitlencod by ttio findings and concluelons Noted in Parts I snd II of the Initial Study; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the projset has bean reviewed and consitlored In complienes with the California environmental Quality Act Of 1970 and, further, thi^ Council hereby Lnuu a Ntgative Declaration. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions sot torah in paragrapho 1, 2, and 3 above, thio4 COU ~~~1 hoaby resolves to ,appsb~i_.Ganetal Plan AmandmaM 91-03, Subarea O, amain rho General Plan Land Vae Map from Medium Reeidsntlal (8-16 dwollinq unite peY acre) to Low-NOdlum Ra Ldential (4-B dwelling unite per acre) for 11.87 acres of lend located on the northeast corner of Ronyon Ney end Noodruff Plscs as shown Ln ExhibiC "A." Tha City Clerk ohell certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 3~ ~ EXIN~IT •A• SASE LINE ROAD N ORDINANCE NO. ~ 7~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SllEAAEA G, AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COfG1UNITY LAND US8 XAP FROM MEDIUM PESIDENTIAL (E-16 DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-E DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE) POR 11. E7 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON THS NORTHEAST COPNER OP RENYON WAY AND WOODRUPP PLACE, AND MAEING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-011-26. A. Renitala. (i) On Nay 20, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Victoria Planned Community through the adoption of Ordinance Nc. 143. !il) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Victoria Planned Community Amentlment No. 91-03, Subarea c, ae deecribetl in the title of this Ortlinance. Hereinafter in thte Ordinance, the subject victoria planned Community Amendment ie referred to ae "the applicat ion.^ (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Commiee ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of ea id public hearing, adopted Resolution 91-158 recommending Lo the City Counc ll that the application be approved. (lv) on November 20, 1991, the City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed publLC hearing and concluded Bald heating prior to Ghe adoption of thL Ordinance. (v) All Legal precegvieitea prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occur[ed. B. Ordinance. follows: The Ciiy Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains ae 1. Thia Council hereby speclf ical ly Elnde that all of the facto eec forth in the Aec itale, Part A, of this ordinance are true and correct. 2. Sneed upon eubetantlal evidence presented to this council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, Lnc lud ing written and oral staff reports, together with public teat imony, this Council hereby specifically finds ae follows: 39g CITY COUNCIL ORIIINANCE NO. VPCA 91-03, SVBAREA G - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (a) The appllcat ion applies to 11.87 scree of land located on the northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Woodruff Place and ie presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated Medium Reeidentlal (B-lb dwelling unite per acre); antl (b) Thr property to the north of the subject site i• designated Community Feclliiy and is vacant; the properties io the south era designated Park and School and are vacant; the property to the east ie designated Low- Medium Reeidentlal (4-B dwelling unite per acre) and ie developed with single family residences; and the property tc the weer is designated Village Commercial and ie developed with a commercial shopping center under construction; and (c) Thie amendment dose not conflict with Lhe Land Use Policies of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the Genersl Plan end with related development; and (d) Thie amendment promotes the gasle and objectives of the Land Use Rloment; and (e) Tho propsrt tee located in SuDarse C of the sppllcation are eu treble toY the aces permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and edj scent land use daelgnatlons es evidenced by the location of properties with the eema land use deeignationa bortlering the euDject site to the east; (f) This amendment would not have a algnLfLcan! impact on the environment nor on ehs surrounding properties ae evidenced by Lhe Eind tags and cent lueione listed Ln Parts I and II of the Initial Study; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project her been reviewed and caneidered Ln <ompllenco wlLh rho California Environmental gust ity Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 6. Based upon the Findtnge end conclueione sot forth in paragraphs 1, 2, end 3 above, thL Council hereby approves Vlctorta P1Anned Community Amentlment 91-03, Subarea G, emending the Victoria Planned Community Land Uee Mep from Medium Reeidentlal (e-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low-Medium Reeidentlal (b-8 dwelling antra per acre) for 13.87 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Kenyon Nay and Woodruff Place ae shown in ExhLD it "A." 5. Tha Mayor shall sign Chis Ordinance end the Clty Clerk ehs 11 cause the eeme to be published within 15 days after its passage et least once in the InlanA Vallsv Deily BR iletin, a newspaper of general circulation published In the City of Ontario, CallFOrnia, and circulated in the city of Rancho Cucemonge, Calitornia. 3q~ EXHISIT 'A' lASE LINE ROAD N RESOLUTION NO. ~/.-~~~ A RESOLUTION OP TFD: CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RANCAO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPAOVYNG GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SVHMEA K, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USB MAP PROM lO:D IUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-INDIUM RESIDENTIAL (6-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) FOR 23.03 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OP VICTORIA PART( LANB AND ROCHESTER AVENV6, AND MAEING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-51. A. Aeeitel e. (i) on April 6, 1931, the City of Anncho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution NO. 31-40. (li) On August 5, 1991, Lha City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an appllcat ion for Genetel Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea H, es describetl In the title of thi• Reaolutlon. xerelnefter in ibis Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment ie referred tc es "the application.^ (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning CommLsion of the CLty of Rancho cucanron9a conducted a duly noticed public hsering on the appl is nt Lon and folloving the conclusion of sell public hearing, adopted Reeolut ion No. 91-159 recommending to the Ciiy Council that the application he approved. (iv) On Novwnber 20, 1991, the City Council of the CLCy of Rancho Cucamonga conducted • duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Raeolution. (v) All legal prerequieitee prior to the adoption of this Reeolut ion hove occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THERE PORN, the Clty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dose hereby find, determine, and resolve ae follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds chat all of the facts set Eoreh in the Recitals, Pazt A, of this Reaolutlon ere true and correct. 2. Based upon euhstant ial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public heating on Novembst 20, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public iestimany, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The epplicetion epplias to 23.03 acres of lend located on the southeast corner o[ Vletorin Party Lans end RochesUr Avenue end i• presently undeveloped. Said property i• currently designst sd Med lum Reeidentlal (3-14 dwelling units per ecte); antl ~{ D CZTY COVNC IL RRSOLUTION NO. GPA 91-03, &UB;IREA H - CITY OP R.C. November Z0, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject eiie, pest the southern Paclf lc Railroad right-of-way, ie deeignatad Plood Control/Utility Corridor and La developed with a Elood control retention basin; the property to the south is deeignatad Medium Residential (e-14 dwelling unite per acre) and is developed with an existing, nonconforming lumbar yard; the property Lo the east ie deeignatad Plood Control/Utility Corridor and is vacant; and the property to the west Le designated Low-Medium Aseldsntlal (4-8 dwelling unite per ecra) and L developed wish single family residences; and (e) This amendment does not conflict with tM Land Uee Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in n manner consistent with the General Plan and with rslatW development; and (d) Thle amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Vee Element; and (a) Ths properties located in Subarea H of the application are eulteble for the aces permitted in the propoud distrlet end are compatible with existing end adjacent land use dulgnations a evidenced by the location of propere lee with the sense land use designations bordering tM subject Bite to the woet; (f) This amendment would not have a significant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and IS of the Initial Study; and 3. This Count ll hereby finds Lhai ih• project has bean reviewed and considered Ln compliant. with the California Bnvironmental Quality Act of 1970 and, furiharr thU Council hereby issues a Negative OseLration. 4, eaeee upon the tindings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, Chis Council hereby rasolvu to approve General Plan Amendment 91-03, Subarea H, amending the G•n•ral Plan Lend Uss Map from Medium Residential (e-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Roid•ntial (4-e dwelling unite per acrq for 23.03 acres of land locntsd on the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lan• and Rochester Avenue a• shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The city clerk shell certify to the adoption of this R•eolut ion yoz EXHIBIT 'A" ORDINANCE N0. ~75 AN ORDINANCE OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03r SUBAREA H, AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USS NAP FROH HEDTUM RESIDENTS AL (H-16 DWELLING VN ITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNIT5 PEA ACRE) FOA 23-03 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNEA OF VICTORIA PARR LANE AND ROCHESTER AVSNVE, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 22T-091-51. A. Regital . (i) On May 20, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Vtetor is Planned Community through the adoption of ordinance No. 143. (ii) On Auquet 5, 1991, the City of Aanchc Cucamonga filed an application for Victoria Planned Community Amendment No. 91-03, Suharea H, ae described in the tit la aP this Ordinance. Nareinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Victoria Planned Community Amendment ie referred to as "the application." (iii) on October 9, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Ranchc Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the applieat ion and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Reaolut ion 91-160 recommending to the City Council that the application 6a approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the Clty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. (v) All legal prerequis itee prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. Tha city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as folLawe: 1. This Council hereby epeciEically finds that all of the facto set Eorth in the Aec itale, Pect A, of th ie Ordinance are true and correct. 2. eased upon eubetant ial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced pubLle hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public teat imony, Chia Counc i! hereby specifically P1nds ae follows: (a) Tha application applies to 23.03 acme of land located on the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rocheetar Avenue and ie presently undeveloped. Said property ie currently designated Medium Residential (E-14 duelling unite per acre); and 4oy CSTY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VPCA 91^03r SUBAREA H - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Pe9e 2 (b) Ths property to the north of the subject Bite, past the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, ie designated Flood Control and is developed with a flood control retention basin; the property to the south is designated Medium Residential (B-ld dwelling unite per acre) and Se tlevelaped with an existing, nonconforming lumbar yard; the property to the east ie designated Vtility Corridor and ie vacant; end the property to the west ie designated Low-Medium Residentinl (4-E dwelling unite per acre) and ie developed with single family residences; and (c) Thie amendment dues not conflict with Ghe Land Use Policies of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community and will provide for development, within Ghe district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related devalopnront; and (tl) This amendment promotes Ghe gcal• and objectives of [ha Land Use Element; and (sj Ths properties located in Subarea H of Che application ate suitable for the uses permitted Ln the proposed district and ere compatlDla with existing and adjacent land uea deaignations as svidented 6y the location of properties with the same land use designations bordering the subject Bite Go the we et; (f) Thl• amendment would not have a •lgntflcani impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and co nclueione listed Ln Paris I and II of the Initial Study; and 3. Thie Council hereby finds that the ptCjeeL has been reviewed antl considered to compliance with Ghe Ca1lEornia environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council Dereby issues a Negative Oeclsrat Lon. 4. Sesed upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, thi• Council hereby approves Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03, Subarea N, amending the Vletoria Planned Community Lend Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Low-Medium Re6 idential (4-8 tlwell ing unite per acre) [or 23.03 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rotheater Avenue ae shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance end the City Clerk shall cause the same to bs published within 15 days afteY ire passage at least once in the Inland yellw Dally 8u list in, a newspaper of general circa let ton published in the City of Ontario, CeliEorntar and circulated in the city of Aancho Cucamonga, Cellfornla. ~1 oS EXHIBIT ' A" RESOLUTION NO. 7/" ~ ~ 3 A ABSOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CBNEAAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA I, AMENDING THE GENEIUL PLAN LAND VSB MAP PROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIVM RESIDENTIAL (d-B DWELLING UNITS PER ACAB) POR 32.16 ACRES OP LAND LOGTED ON TliB NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LIMB ROAD AND ROCNEiTER AVBNVSr ANO HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP - APN: 227-091-45 AND 46 AND A PORTION OP 227-091-44. A. Recitals. (i) On April 6, 1981, ihs City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Reaolution No. 81-40. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Ncemonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea I, ae described in the title of Chic Aeso lut ion. Hereinafter in thin Reaolution, the subject General Plan Amendment i• referred to as "the applicat Lon.^ (iii) On October 9, 1991r the Planning Comolaaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notLeed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public heerinq, adopted Reaolut Lon No. 91-161 recommending to the City Council thei Lhe eppllcatlon be approvetl. (iv) On November 20, 1991r the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public haerinq end concluded esid hearing prior to the adopt LOn of thin Reaolution. (v) All legal prerequle Lt ea prior to the adoption Of this Resolution have occurred. e. Reaolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically rinds that all of the facts set forth Ln the Recitals, Part A, of Chia Resolution are true and correct. 2. Baeed upon auDatantial evidence pteunied to ihL Council dosing the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff report a, together with public Geet imony, thLe Council hereby epecif ically finds ae [ollowe: (e) The applicat lon appl iee to 32.14 ncrea of lend located on the nort heeet corner of Baee Line Roed and Rochester Avenue and ie presently developed with en eaiat ing, nonconfarmtnq lumber yard on the northern parcel. Said property is currently doe Lgnated Medium Resident Sal (8-14 duelling unite per ncre ); and ~{ Dl CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 91-03, EUBAREA I - CITY OP R.C. November 70, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject vita, past the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, ie designated Nedium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) and ie vacant; the property to the south ie designated Low Residential (2-0 dwelling unii• per acre) and is vacant; the property to the east ie designated Flood Control/Utility Corridor and is used Eor plant etaragel and the property to tae weer is designated Medium Residential (E-16 dwelling uniU per acre) and L developed with single family reeLdencee under construction; end (c) Tais amendment does not Goof lief with the Land Vse Policies of the General Plan end will provide for development, within the district, in a manner coneieten! with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment pzonwtae the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) Tha properties located !n Subarea I of Chs application era eu treble for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are egspatible with existing and adjacent land use designations as svidenesd Dy the location of properties with Lower density land uas dsdgnations bordering the subject site to tae south; and (f) Tais amendment would not have a significant impact an the environment nor on the surrounding ptopsrtiea as evidenced by the findings and conclu stone listed in Parts I and II of the In It ial study] and 3. ThL Council heresy finds that tM project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Envlranmsntal Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this council hereby issues a Negative Declsra[Son. 4. Based upon [he finding^ and conclusions sat forth Ln paregraphe 1, 7, and 3 above, this council hereby raeolvea to approve Ceneral Plan Amendment 91-03, subarea I, amending the General Plen Land Uss Nap from Medium Reeidentlal (E-34 dwelling unii• per ecrs) to cow-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) for 37.14 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Base Lino Road and Rochester Avanw ae shown Ln Exhibit ^A." 5. The Clty Clark shell cart lfy to the adoption of this Aseolut ion ~~a ___ ~ HIGNLA A VENUE . ~ M Q o i __ .D u m :': CIIIi]IIQU -----~' c : _ • a J W 1 ~ s ~ ~K'~ '~ __ J ~ ~ mW1Y ~a m W 3 W EXHIBIT 'A' ORDINANCE N0. 4 ~~ AN ORDINANCfi OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COt4fUN ITY AlR:NDMENT 91-03, SUEAREA I, AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIOBNTIAL (8-14 DWELLING VNITS PEA ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM AESIOENTIAL (9-E DWELLING VN ITS PER ACRE) FOA 32.14 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED ON TH8 NORTHEAST CORNER OP BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCNESTEA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-46 AND 46 AND A PORTION OF 227- 091-44. A. Reciiale. (i) On MaY 20, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Victoria Planned Community through the adoption of Ordinance No. 143. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an applicai ion Eor Victoria Planned Community Amendment No. 91-03, subarea I, se described in the title of this ordinance. Hereinafter in thin ordinance, the aubj act Vletoric Planned community Amendment ie referred to ae ^the application." (Sli) On October 9, 1991, the P1ennLng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducied a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Rasolut ion 91-162 recommending to the City Council that the application W eppraved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing end concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of thi• Ordinance. (v) All legal prersqui•Si~s prior to [ha adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. e. ordinance. Ths city Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains ae Eo llowe: 1. This Couneil hereby spec if lc ally finds that ell of the facts set forth Ln the Recitals, Pezt A, of Chia Ordinance era true and correct. 2. eased upon eubstsntial evideneB presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing an November 20, 1991, including written and oral etaEt report •, toga[ her with pu611c testimony, Chia Counc ll hereby specifically finds es follows: (a) The eppllcet ion appl See to 32.34 acres of land located on the northeast corner o[ Baee Line Road and Rochester Avenue and ie presently ~I l D CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VPCA 91-03, SUBAREA I - CITY OF R.C. Novmaber 20, 1991 Page 2 developed with an 'existing, nonconforming lumber yard on Lha northern parcel. Se id property i+ currently designated Medium Residential (8-16 tlwell ing unite per acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site, past the Southern Pacific Rnllroad right-of-way, i+ designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwe llLnq unib per acre) and ie vacanti the property to the south ie tleeignated Low Resident iel (Z-6 dwelling units per acre} and ie veeanti the property to the asst ie designated Utility cocr idor and Le used for plant storage; and the property io <he watt in designated Medium Residential (0-14 dwelling unite per acre) and is developed with single tamily reaitlencee antler construction; and (c) Thie amendment dose not conflict with the Land Vse Policies of the General Plan and Victoria Planned community and will provide for dove lapmant, within the district, in a manner coneiatenC with the General Plan and with related dav+lopment; and (d) Thie emsntlment pcosw<++ Ghe goals and objectives of the Land Use Slement; and (ef Tha properties located in subarea i of th+ spplicatlon are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed di+teiet end era compstibla wi<h existing and atljeceni lend use deelgnation+ ne avid+rtcad by <ha location of propertie+ with lower den+iiy land ues darignations bordering the +ubject Hite ca the south; antl (f) Thie amendment would not have n +ignificant impact an the environment nor on the +uzrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions lSated in Pazt• I and I: of the Initial Study; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project ha+ been reviewed and cone iderad 1n compliance with the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 and, further, thl• Council her+by ieauee a Negative D+clarstion. 4. Bseed upon the findings and coot lu+ione sai focih in pacagrnphe 1, 2, and 3 thous, this Council hereby approvs+ Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03, Bubane I, emending the Victoria Planned Community Land Uae Map Erom Medium Ruidant Lal (e-14 dw+lllnq un1N per sera) [a Low-Medium Ae9 ident inl (d-e dwelling units per sere) for 32.14 aeroe of land located on the northeast corner of Raes Line Aoad and RocheeCer Avenue a+ shown in Exhibit "A." 5. Th+ Nayoc +hnll •Lgn th ie Ordinance and the City Clerk shell cause the same co b+ published within 19 days after iie passage st least once in the Inland Vallev Deily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the CSty of Ont azlo, California, and circulated in the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, Califarnia. EXHIBIT 'A' RE EOLUTION NO. (///_~~tf~ A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SVBAREA J, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LANG USE MAP FROM HEOIUM RESIDENTIAL (E-14 DHELLING UNITE PER ACRE( TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDBNTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITE PER ACRE) FOR 20.895 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED APPAO%IMATELY 892 FEET NORTH OF THE PUTURE VICTORIA PARK LANE E%TENEION ON THE HEST SIDE OF THE FUTURE DAY CREEA BOVLEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-021-03 AND 13. A. Rec Lt ale. (i) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved Lhe enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Reeolut ion No. 81-40. (it) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea J, as deeerlbed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in [Ate Aeeolutlon, the subject General Plan Amendment 1e reterred to ae "t ha applltet ion.^ (iii) On Oci obey 9, 1991, the Planning Commie eion of the Cliy of Rancho Cucamongn conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following tAe conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Reeolut ion Nc. 91-169 recommending to the Ciiy Council that the application be approved. (iv) on November 20, 1991, the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded eeitl hearing prior to the adoption of this Reeolut ion. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adopt LOn of this Reeolut ion have occurred. R. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, Lhe city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby Eind, determine, and resolve ae follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facto set forth in the Reclt ale, Pa it A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing an November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff report e, together with public Leetimony, thl^ Council hereby apecif ically finds ee follows: (a) The application applies to 20.895 acres of land located approximately 892 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lena axten•ion on the west Bide of the future Day Creek Boulevard and ie presently undeveloped. Eaid property Se currently designated Medium Reeldential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre); and '~ i3 CITY COUNCIL R6ROLUTION NO. GPA 91-03, SUBAREA J - CITY OP R-C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site ie deeignated Medium Residential (8-16 dwelling unite pet acre) and ie vacant; the property to the south is dssignetad Low-Metllum Residential (4-B dwelling unite per acre) and ie vacant; Cha property to the east ie deeignated Flood Control/Utility Corridor and ie vacant? and the property to the west ie deeignated Flood Control/Utility Corridor and Se vacant; end (c) Thi• amendment does not conflict with the Land Ues Policies of the General plan and will provitle for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of iha Land Uee Element; and (e) Ths properties located Ln SuDarsa J of the application are suitable Eor the uses permitted in the proposed district and ors compatible with existing end adjacent land use deslgnatlone es evidenced by the location OE properties with the same land use designations bordering the subject site to the south; and (f) ThLS amendment would not have a eignlficant impnct on the environment nor on the surrounding propert lee ne evidenced Dy the findings and conclueione lisietl Ln Parts I and II of the Initial Study; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has bean reviewed and cone idered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality AcL of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Dec leration. 4. Based upon the findings and conclueione set forth Ln paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves to epptova General Plan Amendment 91-03, Subaren J, amending the General Plan Land Vss Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) to Law-MSd Lum Aes ldentiel (a-8 dwelling unite per aers) for 20.895 scree of lend located approximately 892 feet north of tae future Victoria Park Lane axianaion on the west side of the future Day Crssk Boulevard as shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The Clty Clark shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution 41~ N16NLAN A VENUE Y~ a C t~ __ _ _ M •~ O a v c = c ~ 5 W f ~ ~~ J O g p ® I w :•~• • •1 .~~ ~~ ~• ®® W W M W aq 1~ :•.•.ti•. ~ I W i W t O H W EXIi181T 'A' ORDINANCE NO. ~~~ AN OAD INANCB OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA J, At~NDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RES IOENTIAL (8-14 OWELLINC UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM AESIDBNT IAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 2D. 895 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 892 PEET NORTH OF THE FVTURE VICTORIA PARE LANE EXTENSION ON TH8 WEST SIDE OF THE FUTURE OAY CAEEX BOULEVARLI, ANO MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TFffiAeOF - APN: PORTION OF 227-021-03 AND 13. A. Recitals. (i) On May 20, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Victoria Planned Community through the sdoption of Ordinance No. 143. (it) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Vicioiie Planned Community Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea J, ae described in the tiil• of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in Chia Ordinance, the subject Victoria Planned Community Amendment is referred to ae "t ha application." (iii) On October 9, 1991, the PlennLng CommLeeion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga condudsd a duly notleed public hearing on the application and following Che conclusion of said public heating, adopted Reeolutlon 93-170 recommending to Lha city Council that the appl lcetion be approved. (Lv) on November 20, 3991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduct ad a duly noticed pu611c hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the sdoption of Chic Ordinance. (v) All legal preraquisltee prior to the atloption of this ordinance have occurred. e. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as Eol lows: 1. Th1a Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facto set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ord inence are true end correct. 2. Beeed upon eubstential evidence presented to ihie Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written end Orel staff reports, together with public testimony, Chia Council hereby epeclf lcally finds as follows: (a) The appllcat ion applies to 20.895 acres of Lend locaced approximately 892 fast north of the future Victoria Patk Lana sxtana ion on the 4i~ CITY COVNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VPCA 91-03, SVBAREA J - CITY OP R-C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 went aids of the future Day Creek Boulevard and ie presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated Medium Residential (e-l4 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject eiie ie deeignated Medium Resident Lal (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant; the property to the south ie deeignated Low-Medium Aesidential (6-a dwelling unite per acre) and i• vacant; the property io the east i• deeignated Utility Corridor and ie vacant; the property io the west ie deeignated Utility Corridor end is vacant; and (e) This amendment dose not eonf Llet with the Land Vse Policies of ehs General Plan and Victoria Planned Community and will provide for development, within the district, Ln a manner coneiaient with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) ThLS amendment promotes the goal^ and objectives of the Land Vee E1sme0t7 and (a) The properties located in Subarea J of the application are eu iiabls for the aces permitted in the proposed district and era compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations se evidenced by the local ion of properties with the same land use designations bordering the subjad site to the south; and (f) Thi• amsndnwrnt would not new a significant tmpsct on the environment nor on the surrounding properties es svidencad by the findln9e antl conclusions listed Ln Parts I and II of the Initial Study; and 3. Thie Council hereby finds that the project hat bean reviewed and considered in complLancs with the Cal ifornla Snvitonnientel Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 4. eased upon the findln9e and conclusions sat Eorth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 nbove, this council hereby approves Victoria Planned Conmunity Amendment 91-03, Subarea J, amending the Victor la Planned Community Land Use Map from Medium Aesidential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-B dwllLng units per acts) for 20.895 acres of land locaeed approximately 892 fast north of the future Victoria Perk Lane extension on the weer olds of the future Dey Creak Bou leverd as shown in Exhibit "A." 5. Ths Mayor shall sign this Ordinance end Che City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after ire passage at least once in the I 1 nd Valle Dally Eullstln, a newspaper of general ctrcul at ion published in the City of Oniar lo, Califarnie, and circulated in Cho city of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~I~ W 2 W t t O i H W EXHIBIT 'A• RESOLVTION NO. 91- ~ ~~ A RBSOLUTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIPOANIAr OENY ING GENERAL. PLAN AHENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA R, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND V56 HAP FROM MEDIUM REB IDENTIAL (8-14 DNELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) POR 7.895 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED BETiIEEN APPROXIMATELY 892 PEET ANO 1,200 FEET NORTH OF THE FUTVRE VICTORIA PARR LANE E%TENSION ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE FUTVRE OAY CREEA BOVLEVAPD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREO$ - APN: PORTION OF 227-021-03 AND 13. A. Recite le. (i) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81-40. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea R, an described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in chic Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred io ae "the nppllcation." (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Commiuion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hsnring on tRS application and following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Reeolut ion No. 91-171 recommending to the City Council chat the application be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed puDllc Rearing and concluded ea id hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prsrequieltea prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, Che City Council of the City oP Rancho Cucamonga does hereby Eindr determine, and resolve ae follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facto eet Forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Reeo lotion are true end correct. 2. Beeed upon eubeiantiel ev idencs presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, Lncluding written and oral staff report e, together with public teat imony, this Council hereby epecLf ically Einde ae follows: (a) Tha application appliee to 7,895 acres of land located between approximste ly 892 feet and 1,200 feat north of the Eutun Victoria Park Lane ezteneion on the west side of the future Dey creek Boulevard and .e presently undeveloped. Se id property ie currently designated Ned ium Realdential (8-14 dwelling unite par acre); end ~~ CITY COUNCIL RSSOLVTION NO, GPA 91-03, SURARRA K - CITY OF R.C. Novembsi 20, 1991 Page 2 (t) Tha property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling uniU per acre) and i• vacant; the property to the south i• designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre) and ie vacant; the property to the east is designated plood Control/Utility Corridor and ie vacant) and the property to the west ie designated Flood Control/Utility corridor and La vacant; and (c) Thi• amendment conflicts with the Lend Use Polities of the General Plan and will noL provide for dwelopmsnt, within the district, in a manner cons ULan! with the General Plan and with relsted tlsvQopment; and (d) This amendment does not promote ehs goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The propertie• located Ln Bubarea K o! the application are not eu itabL for the uses pecmitCSd in tae proposed dlrtrict antl ate not compatible with exiting and edjscent lend use doignationa; and (f) This amendment will not have a •LgniElcanC impace on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidanted 6y the findings and conclusions liatsd Ln Parts I end II of !M Initial 9tutly7 and 3. Thie Council hereby finds that the project hu been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Bnvironmsntal Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby Lsuu a Negative Declaration. 4. eased upon the findings and conclusLOna set foreh in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby ruolvo to dmy Osneral PLn Amendment 91-03, Subarea R, a request to amend the General Plan Lnnd Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per sera) to Low-Medium Resldentlel (d-B dwelling unit per acre) for 7.895 acres of land located bsewsen approximately 892 feat and 1,200 feet north of the future Victoria Patk Lane extension on the wa et Bide of Lae future Day Creek Boulevartl as shown in Sxhlbit ^A." 5. Tha city Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 20 EXMI8IT 'A' RESOLUTION NO. 7/- ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VICTORIA PLANN60 C014fONITY AHENDHENT 91-03, SUBAREA X, A REQUEST TO AMEND TH6 VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIVX RESIDENTIAL (8-ld DWELLING VNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) POR 7.899 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY 892 FBET AND 1,200 FEET NORTH OF THE FUTURE VICTORIA PARR LANG EXTENSION ON THB WEST SIDE OP TH6 FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP - APN: PORTION OP 227-021-03 AND 13. A. Recitals. (i) On May 20, 1981, the Clty of Rsncho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Victoria Planned community through the adoption of Ordlnence No. 143. (li) on August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucsaonga filed an application foz Victor is Planned Community Amendnrnt No. 91-03, Subarea R, ae deecriDed in the title of Lhis Resolution. Narelnafter in this Reeolutlon, the subject Victoria Planned Community Anwndmsnt is referred to ae "the application.^ (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticetl puDllc hearing on the application and following the coot fusion of esid publ lc hearing, adopted Resolution No. 91-172 recommending to the City Council that Ghs application ba denied. (iv) On November 20, 1991, Che City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Reeclut ion. (v) All legal prerequisltee prLOr to the adoption of this Reaolut ion have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, TXERE PORE, [he City Council of the Clty of Rsncho Cucamonga dose hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facto eat forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Reeolutlon are true end correct. 2. eased upon substantial evidence prauntad to thL Counetl during the above-re[erencsd public hearing on November 2D, 1991, Sncluding written and oral eta[f reports, together wish public tact lmony, this Council hereby epecif lcally finds as follows: ~iZZ CITY COUNCIL R830LUTI0N NO. VPCA 91-03, SUBAREA K - CITY OP R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (n) The epplicaLion applies [0 7.595 acres of land located between appraxlmately 892 foot and 1,200 feat north of two fuiurs Victoria Park Lane extension on the west aide of the future Day Creek Boulevard and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite par acre); and (D) Tha property to the north of the suDjsci •iis is designated Medium-Nigh Residential (14-24 dwelling unite par acre) and is vacant; the property to the south i• deiignatsd Medium Residential (8-16 dwelling unite per acre) end i• vacant; the property to the asst is daaignatad Utility Corridor and ie vacant; and the property to the west la daaignatad Vtility Corridor and ie vacant; end (c) Thie amendment conf licL with iha Land Uo PolicLas of the General Plan and Victoria Plannatl Co®unity and will not provide for development, within the district, in a manner eonsLtent with the General Plen and with related davslopmentJ and (d) Thie smsndment tloes not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; end (e) Tha prapsrties located Ln Suberaa K of the application are net suitable for the uses permitted in Chs propoud dLtrict end are not compatible with existing and adjaesnt land uw dssignaticns; and (f) ThL amendment will not nave a significant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced Dy fns tindinga and conclusions listed in Paris Z and II of the Znitial Study; and 3. Thie Council hereby finds that the project hu bwn reviewed and considered in compliance with the California 6nvironmsnisl quality Act of 1970 and, further, this council hereby iuuas a Negative Declaration. 4. eased upon ehs findings end conclusions ut forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, ibis Council hereby resolves to deny Viciorie Planned community Amendment 91-03, Subarea K, a request to emend the Victoria Planned Community Lend Uee Map from Medium Residential (5-14 dwsillnq unite per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Eor 7.595 ecra^ of land located between apprazimetely 892 feet and 3,200 feat north of the future VLctoria Perk Lane sxGns ion on the west •ids of tAa future Day Creek Boulevard es shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The City Clark shall certify to the adoption of rata Reeolut ion. ~t 23 HI(iHLA - ' ^ --- A VENUE ' ~M O o i -_ _ .D o o s ~, i C v ~ :~ J~: W o t ~~ _ ~ -~jW V~SdHU+ Ads ~ ~ ~ ~- ` '1 :•' O W J < O ~ () ® .~ .~ W .•.• .'..~ ' :.~• I • : z • •~ h N i W W L O i H W EXHIBIT 'A' A650LUTION NO. 9/~ 3 ~~ A AESOLUT ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SVBAREA L, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LANG UBE MAP FAOH IgDIVN-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UN LTS PER ACRE( TO CIVIC/COMfDNITY POR 2.66 ACRHS OF LAND LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 406 PEST SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND APPROXIMATELY 321 FEET WEST OF TH6 FUTURE DAY CREER BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OP 227-091-18 ANO 19. A. Recital e. (L) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81-60. (ii) On Auqu st b, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea L, as des ctiDed in the title of tAie Resolution. Hereinafter in th1• Resolution, the eub)sct General Plsn Amendment L referred to as "the applicni Lon." (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Comeiu ion of Ghe City of Rancho Cutemongn conducted a duly noticed public hearing mn the application and following the cone lueion of ea id publ lc hearing, adopted Resolution No. 91-165 recommending to the City Council that the application De approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the Ciiy Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga contluctad n duly 'noticed public hearing and concluded sold hearing prior tc the adoption of thin Resolution. (v) All legal prerequieitae prior to Che adoption of this Aeeolut ion have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THERBPORE, Lhe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve ae follows: 1. This counell hereby epecif really finds Ghat all of Ghe Eacte aet forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Reeolut ion are true and correct. 2. Boned upon euhetantisl evidence presenisd to ehi• Council during Ghe aDOVe-referenced public hearing an November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff report •, together with public taetimmnyr this Council hereby specifically finds ae follown: (s) The appllcat ion applies to 2.46 acres of land located approximately 406 [set south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way and approximately 321 feet Went of the future Dey Creek Boulevard and Se presently undeveloped. Sala property Ls currently tleeignsted Med lum-High Residential (14-24 dwelling unite par acre): and ~ 2S CITY COVNCIL ASSOLVTION NO. GPA 91-03, SVBARRA L - CITY OP R.C• November 20, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject Bite, pant the southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, ie designated Low-Medium Aeeidentlel (4-e dwelling unite pas acre) and La vacant; the property to the south ie designated Medium-H1gA Ru idmtial (14-26 dwelling unite per acre) and is vacant; the property to the seat L• deaignated Plood Control/Vtllity corridor and is vaeant7 antl tN property to the weal ie designated Medium-Nigh Residential (34-24 dwelling unite per acre) and is vacsntj and (c) Thi• amendment does not conEllct with the Land Vee Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the diatricL, in a manner consistent with tM General Plan and with related developmeni; and (d) Thie amendment promotes the goals and oDjact L~~e of the Land Use Elsmant; and (e) TN propertis• located in Subarss L of the epplicaiion ere suitable for the uue permitted in Lha proposed district and era compatible with exist lnq and adjacent land use designations a evidenced Dy tN subject e ita'• praxLolty to major artsrial• and the Southern Pacific Ral lroad rlght- of-way; and (f) Thls amendment will not nave a •ignlficant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evldeneed by the findings end conclusions listed in Parts I end II of the Initial Study; and 3. TDie Council haraDy finds that Lhe project has Daen reviewed and considered Ln compliance wiLD the California Bnviro;muntel Quality Act of 1970 and, further, Gals Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 6. Rasta upon the findings and conclusions set farLh in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, thin Council hereby resolves to approve General Plan Amendment 91-03, Subarea L, amending Lhe General Plan Land Uu Mep from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Civic/Community for 2.46 scree of land located approximately 606 feat south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-o[-way and approx Lmately 321 test wart of the future Day croak Boulevard as •hawn in Rxhlbit ^A." 5. Tha Clty Clark shall certify to the adoption of thin Resolution Z W t pt i t !~ W EXH181T 'A' OAl1INANCE NO. ~7X AN ORDINANCE OF THE CTTY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPOANIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA L, AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COHMUN ITY LAN- VSE MAP PROM t1E-IUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO COMMUNITY PACILITIES POR 2.46 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED APYRO%IMATELY 406 PEST SOUTH OP THB SOUTNEAN PACIFIC MILROAD AIGNT-OP- WAY AND APPAO%IMATELY 321 FEET WEST OP THE FVTUAB -AY CREEE BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP - APNi PORTION OP 227-091-18 AND 19. A. Recitals. (1) On Hay 20, 1901, the City of Rancho Cucamonga epptoved the enactment of the Victoria Planned Community througR the adoption of Ordinance No. 143. (ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Ranoho Cucamongs filed an application for victorLa planned Community Amendment No. 91-03, Subnrea L, ae described in the tit la of thin Ordinance. Hereinafter In this Ortlinanca, the aubj act victoria Planned Community Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Commie ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the applicat ion and following the coot lueion of acid public hearing, adopted Aesoluiion 91-166 recommending to the Clty Council that the spplication be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Aencho Cucamonga conducted 4 duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to thv adoption of thin Ordinance. (v) All legnl prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucartwnga hereby ordains as follows: 1. This council hereby epee Lf lc ally finds chat all of the facto eat forth in the Recitals, Part A, of thle Ordinance era true and correct. 2, Beeed upon su6etaniinl av idence preeanted to thin Council during the above-referenced publ lc hoar ing on November 20, 1991, Lncluding written and oral etatf reports, together with public teetlmony, this Coanc ll hereby spec if ice lly finds ae followsi (a) The application applies to 2.46 acres of lend located approximately 406 feet south of the Southern Pac lEic Railroad right-of-way and 4zB CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VPCA 91-03, SUBAREA L - CITY OF A.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 approximately 321 feet west of the future Day Creek eoulevard and ie presently untleveloped. Said property Se currently tlaeignated Metlium-High Aeeidential (14-24 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject Bite, past the Southern Peclf is Railroad right-of-way, is designated Low-Medium Aeeidential (4-9 dwelling units par acre) and ie vacant; the property to the south i• tleaignated Medium-High Ree idential (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) and Se vacant; the property to the east le designated Vtillty corridor and is vacant; and the property to the west i• designated Medium-High Reaidantial (14-24 dwell inq unite per sera) end ie vacant; and (c) Thi• amendment does not conflict with the Land Use policies of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Community and will provide far development, within !ha district, in a manner cone intent with the General plan and wish rsleted development; antl (d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives Of the Land Vee Elamant; end (e) The properties located in Subarea L of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compai able with existing end edjecent lend use designations as evidenced by the subject e ire's prox imlty to major arterials and the southern Pacific Railroad right- o£-Nay; and (E) Thia amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidertced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Study; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has bean reviewed and cone Ldered in compliance with the cslifornia Environmental Quality Act of 190 antl, EurtMr, this Council hereby iouea s Negative Declaration. 4. Based upon ihs findings and cone lualona nee forth Ln paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council heraDy approves Victoria Planned Community Amendment 91-03, Subarea Lr emending the Vlctotie Planned Community Land Use Hap Etom Medium-High RHldent Lal (14-24 dwelling unite par acre) to Community Facilit Le^ for 2.46 acres of lantl located approximately 406 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way and approximately 321 teat west of the future Day Creak Boulevard as shown in Exhibit ^A." 5. The Mayor shell sign this Otdlnence and the City clerk shell cause the same to ba publ Lhed within 15 days after 1L pauags at least once in the Inland Veliw Deily Bulletin, a newapapat of general circulet ion pu611ehetl 1n the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucemongn, California. y29 EXHIBIT 'A' RESOLUTION NO. ~/~ ~ F O A RESOLUTION OF TMB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GHNERAL PLAN A)~NDI~NT 91-03, SUBAREA M, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIVM-HIGH AESIOeNTIAL (14-26 DWELLING UNITS PER ACAS) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL POR 7.895 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED BETWEEN APPRO%IMATELY 600 FEET AND 1,000 FEET SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVBNU% ON THH WEST sIOS OF THE FUTURE DAY CAEBA BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP - APN: PORTION OF 227-021-03 AND 13. A. Recitals. (i) On April 6, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81-d0. (ii) on August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application Eor General Plan Amendmani No. 91-03, Subarea M, as described in the title of this Resolution. Bereinafier in this Resolution, the euD~act General Plan Amendment is referred to as ^tha appl Lcetion.^. (iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning Commiesicn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of es id public hearing, ndopie0 Reeolution No. 91-173 recomoending to the Clty Council thnt the npplication be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho cucamonge conducted s duly noticed public hearing end concludetl said hearing prior to the adoption OE thi• Reeolution. (v) All legal prarequlsitee prior to the adoption of this Reeolution have occurred. E. Reeolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dose hereby find, determine, end resolve es follows: 1. This Council hereby speeif lcally finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this ReeolutLon are true and correct. 2. Beeed upon euDStential evidence prsseniad to [hie council during the above-referenced public heerlnq on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff nporte, together with public teat imony, this Council hereby specifically finds ae follows: (a) The applicet ion applies to 7.895 scree of lend located between approx Lmetaly 600 Eeet and 1,000 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west side of the future Dey Creek Boulevard end Ss presently undeveloped. said property ie currsn[ly designated Medium-Nigh Reeidantlal (14-24 dwelling un Lte per acre)) and ~t31 CITY COVNCIL ABSOLUTION NO. GPA 91-03, SUEAAEA M - CITY 0P A.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 (b) Tha property to the north of the subject elte ie des ignnted Neighborhood Canmeccial snd ie vacant; the property to [he south ie designated Medium-High Aaaidsnt inl (14-24 dwelling unite par acre) and ie vacant; the property to the octet is designated Plood Control/Utility Corridor and is vacanti antl the property io the west ie deei9natad Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling unite par acre) and Plood Control/Utility Corridor end ie vacant; and (e) This amendment dose not tonfl Let with the Land Uw Polic lee of the General Pian and will provide for development, aithin the district, in s manner consistent with the General Plan and with relnted development; and (d} This amsndaw.nt promotes the goals and objeetivee of the Land Usa Slamsnt; and {a) TM propsrt iss located in Subarea M of tM application are suitable for the uws permitted in the proposafl dLtrict and era eompatibie with exiting and adjacent lend use deelgnntione as evidenced by the loeatlan of property with the soma land use designation bortlazing the subjec! site to cha nmrthi and {f) Thie amendnent will not have a eignif scant impecC on the anvizonmant nor on the suzromding p[alatrt ies as svidancYd 6y the findings and conclusions Listed in Pacts I and LI of the Initial Study; end 3. ThL Councll hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and coneideiad in camplisnca with the California Bnvironmantsl quality Act of 1970 and, further, thU Council hereby ieaues a Negative Daolaraticn. 4. eased upon tAs findings and conclusions est forth in paxagrapha 1, 2, anfl J above, this Councll hereby resolves Lo approve General elan AmandmspE 91-03, Subarea M, amending the Gsnaral Plan Land Uab Map from Medium-High Rssidantisl (16-24 dwell inq uniC• psx sera) to Neighbonc~od Comaetcial for 7.895 aerss of lend located between approximsialy 600 feet and 1,000 fast south of Highland Avenue on the west side of the fuiurs Day creak Eoulevazd as shown in Exhibit "A." 5. Tha City Clark shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution y3L EXHIBIT 'A• ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~ / AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA M, AMENDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMHVN ITY LAND USE MAP PROM MEDIVM-HIGH RESTOENTIAL (14-24 DNELLING UNITS PER ACAS) TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL FOA 7.895 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET ANO 1,000 FEET SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ON TXE WEST SIDE OF THE FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND HARING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: PORTION OF 22'7-023-03 AND 13. A. Recitals (i) On May 20, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approvetl the enactment of the Victoria Planned Convnunity through the adoption of Ordinance No. 163. (ii) On Augu at 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cu canwnge filed an application for VLctorla Plannod Community Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea N, ae described in the title Of this Ordinance. Hereinafter !n thte Ordinance, the subject Victoria Planned Community Amendment le referred to ae "the application." (iii) On October 9, 1991, Che Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of eaitl public hearing, adopted Resolution 91-174 recommending to [he City council that the application be approved. (iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded eaitl hearing prior to the adoption of thLe Ordinance. (v) All legal prerequ ie it ea prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. 0. Ordinance. Tha City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains ae Follows: 1. Thla Council hereby spec Lf ically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rec it al e, Pert A, of this Ordinen ce ers [rue and correct. 2. Rased upon eubetant iel evidence presented to this council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, Lncluding wr icten and oral eteEf reports, together with public teat imony, this Council hereby specifically finds ae follows: (a) The applicet ion applies to 7.895 acres of :nnd located between approximately 600 feet and 1,000 feet south of N/ghland Avenue on the 431 CITY COVNCIL ORDINANCH NO. VPCA 91-03, SCBAREA H - CITY OF R.C. November 20, 1991 Page 2 west Bide of the future Day Creek Boulevard and le presently undeveloped. Said property ie currently designated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling unite par acre); and (b) The property to the north of the subject •Lte i• daeignated Village Commercial and ie vacant; the property to the south Ls daeignated Medium-High Reaidential (14-24 dwelling unite per acre) and Ls vacant; the property to the east i• daeignated Utility Corridor and Se vacant; and the property io the we et ie daeignated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelliny unite per acre) and Util i[y Corridor and i• veeant; and (c) Thie amendment does not conflict wish the Land Vea Policies of the General Plan and Victoria Planned Comeunity end will provide for development, within the dintrici, in a manner eoneietent with Lhe General Plan and with re letad love lopaentf and (d) ThL amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) Ths propertis• located in Subaru M of the epplicat ion era suitable fat the uses permitted in the prapoead district and era compatible with extetinq end adjacent land use dssignatlons as evidenced by the location of property with the same lend use duignetion bordering the sabject ^ite to the northt and (f) Thle emendmeni will not have a significant impact on the environment nor on the surround ing properties as evidenced by the findings and cant lueione listed in Parts~I and II of the Initial Study; and 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has bean ravLewed and considered in compliance wish the California Environmental Quality Act of 1990 and, Eurther, this Councll hereby issues a Nflgnt Lvs Daclarntlon. 4. Baead upon the find Inge end conclusions eat forth Ln paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Councll hereby epprove• Vlctoria planned Community Amendment 91-03, Subarea M, amending the Vlctoria Planned Cp~unity Lend Use Mep from Medium-High Residsntisl (id-24 dwelling unlt^ per acre) to Village Commercial for 7.896 acres of lnnd located between epproxlmataly 600 feet and 1,000 feet eauth of Highland Avenue on the west •ids of the future Day Creek Boulevard as shown In Exhlb It ^A." 6. Tha Mayor shall •Lgn this Ordinance and the CLty Clerk shall cause the came to be puDl is had within 15 days after its psuega at least once in the Inland Val lev Oaily Sul lstin, fl newspaper of general circa let ion pabliehed in the City of Ontario, California, end circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. y3~ EXHIBIT 'A' ~ANNERINO /~'ev BRIGUGLI~ JOHNO MgNNEAINO SAL BAIG UGL:O November 20, 1991 HAND DELIVERED Mayor Dennis L. Stout Councilmember William J. Alexander Councilmember Charles J. Buquet Councilmember Diane Williams Councilmember Pamela J. Wright Re: Sam's Place Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: Pursuant to our client's request, please find enclosed petitions which we believe to be self-explanatory. Please consider these, as well as the petitions previously filed in this matter, at tonight's City Council meeting. very truly yours, MANNERS §r BRIGOGL O / Y ~y1,1 By: Jo n Manne i o JDM/drm 9333 BgSE LINE fl0A 0, SUITE 110 / HANC NO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 /TEL 1714) 9001100 / FA%17141 941.8610 September 11, 1991 T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SeLM'S PLACE nape WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS AND/CR C?ISTO:~fERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CAILNE[.ZAN STPWEI, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. [1E STRONGLY OPPOSE TIME LIMITATION OF HOURS TTQ; CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BL'SI\FSS 0[v'NFRS ANU RESIDENTS OF THE CONM[INITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACI\Y; BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PP.Eti IOliS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND !IN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BINEFIT FRO!4 EA&NING AN EQUIT.~IBLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRFSL~fED INb`OCEWT FIRST. WF SLPPORT SMf, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIED, SUT TODAY IS BIASID AND UIdF'OIPIDID. Prin Ced Name Signature Address September 11, 1P91 T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigne3 RE: Se4M'S PLACE WE THE L?WERSIG\'ED ARE FRIENDS A\'D/C'R C(iSTOM~RS OF SAM'S PLACE, 66?0 Crll2~\'ELIAN STP.EET, RANCHO CL'C?.~IONGA, CA. H'E STRONGLY OPFOSE THE LI?IITATIOV OF HOURS ZfiC CITY ZS T: @OSi:~G ON S~L^I'S. AS BUSINESS 0!v1-ERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE CO~L"IUNITY, WE MOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE GF PLACING BI,A1vfE IN ADVeLVCE ON A BUSINESS FOR TIB: ACTIONS OF PRElT0U5 0[viVERS (N 1985 NO LESS) IS SL~LtiTID, DISCRIMNATORY AND LRd- COVSTITLTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FRO;•1 EARNING A.\' EOliITe1DL~E LIVI\G BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLE~LS DOFS NOi JUSTIF7." THE PHILOSOP.9Y THAT Iv'E ARE A DF'vi 1CCRaCY tL\D THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESti ~D INNOCr"Ni' FIRST. l,T: SUPPORT SA:•!, HIS FAMILY eL\U STAFF AND A$K 'I7iAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEfr A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS NSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BI.9SED AND U[JFOU:•IDED. eaa____ p.n. ~ s.nrvnair /r L!/h2 TZ9 /t7pcH/Q/i~01( ~ r , ~ S ~ ~ S<d e ~ G L~.af ~~~ p ~"; .~i~m.~ i~- Page c~M~ Printed Vane Signature Sepeem6er Il, 1991 T0: Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned Page RE: SAM'S PLACE _c WE THE UND11iSIG~`ED ARE FRTEVDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CAIh~]ELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAAM'S. AS BUSINESS OSvNERS AND RESIDE~'TS OF THE COtM10NTTY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACI:'.G BLAME IN ADVANCE GN A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNIItS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SI.ANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAh. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EAR:\I\G AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY TILAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SeVN, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREF[JLLX REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO i7AS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID AND UdFOUNDID. i', ' ~`. . `~~ September 11, 1991 T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SA*1'S PLACE Page lvT•, THE Ul~ERSIC,~IID ARE FRIF_VT)5 Ai7D/CR CUSTOMERS OF S.4M' S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CLiC:k*fONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LI2IITATNN CF HOUR5 Tk~ CITY IS IMPOSING 0'.i s4M'S. AS BUSZNESS OWNERS AND RESIDE~*i fS OF THE COIRI[JtQITF, WE WOULD LIKE TO 5'L4TE THE ATTITLT)E OF PLACING BLtLKE IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PRECIOUS CIJNEItS (IN 1985 NO LE55) IS SLANLID, DISCRIMIfiATORY AIVD UN- CONSTITUIIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING A,ti EQUIT:'tBLE LI4ING P.ECAliSE OF PRIOR PROBr r'"nt DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT lv'E ARE A DE^fOCRACY AND THAT FEOPLE ARE PRESIJPfID INNOCE+T FIRST. WE SUPPOP.T SFu~t, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK T:itlT YOU CAREF'i7LLY REVIEW A DECISZON 'GMAT SIX YF_Nt5 AGO IvAS NSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID A.W UZdFOUNDID. Printed Name ~~„ayS pew /I7/hv Caincsc-' ~~ ` ~r/ JOE ~rt0 v+n b5 -~a ~.N %~, ll,~s~ Signature Address t Aso ~nc.~on=oaf` ~6r~ l ev.~y ~ ~d~/Q~LAJ4'~OCR CI YkT'vf La~nN q~rs~ ~~~ S~ ,l~n. ' " S~~ cc ,~' c; ±.:1 !L " 90,9 ~~:~l~;c ,~~< d ~rla^^dr)Ki1 'J~uT"I-ESC' ~i.'ti~.t,4~t c c~ ~ RF I~je~, Nl~~k~\\ '~~..-~ ~y `1556 Nem~«ti cf. 6'.l. `~t7~c tC~,P.Fui ai~t-uw•,S ~~G/~n.~ i0:•`(y A/RuD Ac pYS ~.C. ~I14J 3'fe~l~"P,. d Ne~R ~-- 1Sd-It/LI &G~`~ Uy~y'd i , c. R•C. 5'f7,1o _ `j/S 3 ~Q~~M lc~ /~ ~ Ji loi /Jdv~u Ryan ~~,'7„~~/~~„~ ~~/~ 5~3y~?t~~,gv,~he AL 91"9c~ ~JPNtT {c.~ ELQ E.Lq e/2 ~G*,~~ ~'~~I"'71 (.. ~P4~' ln.tNC U~R.N `~.C .'T l~io( lt(.~.iy~Cawicnc,e_J J 1 v' U Ixt4f~Gyi.crti- en~h4~7iz ~A N £~p LEc1t RN 10722 l P~c.~-? b4~ September 11, 1991 I0: City of Rancho Curamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE ~ _' ~~ Page [.'E THE UWERSIGNED ARE FRIEhTIS ANA/CR CUSTOtB1t5 OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARVEI.IAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CZTY IS IMPOSING ON SAN'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDE~1'S OF THE COMMUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE Ifs ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANPID, DISCRIMINATORY AND I1N- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING .~1\ EQUITADLE LIVING EECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCEtiT FIRST. Sv'E SUPPORT SA2~I, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVISIT A DECISION 'LYAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS NSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID AND UNFOUNDED. Printed name Signature Address ~ ~1 %er.~~.SA /g~z/«.~~ /; Si` Cti/lGi.~lcr~ /~~~~iCi«<ac. ~~~~ ~c TVer NY. L, ;~- /~ i! ~ lid <r" £: / C31 -, September 11, 1991 T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SA41'S PLACE WE TfB: UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIII7D5 g~pp,-I, RANCNO CUCAMONGA, CA. N SAM'S. Page AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAP1'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN WE ~pNGLY OPFOSE TBE LIMITATION OF HOURS T}¢ CITY IS IMPOSING 0 COMMUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE IDENTS OF THE S FOR i;;~ ACTIONS OF AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RES ~ ADVANCE ON A DDS~p.{INA'LORY AND UN- ~g, ATTITl7DE OF PLACING BLAME pREVi0U5 OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, JUSTIFY 'IfiE AN EOU ZABI.E LLIVING BECUSE ~F PRIOR PROBLII1S DOFSBNOT IT FROM E~~~r'NI PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED ASK ':1IAT YOU CAREFULLY ~UNFOUNDID. FIRST. HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND DEC SION THAT SIX YEARS ACA tiAS JUSTIFIID, RUT TODAY IS BIASID AID Address September 11, 1991 T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE Page WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, C.4. WE STAONGI,Y OPPOS°. Tf~ LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IIiPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF TIIE COIMIUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIDNAL. TD LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROI1 E4RNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUPBD) INNOCF[. vT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS NSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID AND U[7E'0@R)ID. Printed Name Signature Address 'mhef~ t-v,(yu~ ~,~_,L^Mjt 7Soa i~eNbw+~ s.~, (~ c. ,~ , September 11, 1991 Page T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See tmdersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS TEH: CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWFIERS AND RESIDENTS OF TEtE COMMUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLAC12~*G BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SIr1NT'ID, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING P.ECAUSE OF PRSOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PHIIASOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUI4D INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK ARLFULLY REVIEW A DECISION 'EYAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID. DAY IS BIASID AND UNFOUNDED. Printed Name C,(/IG~~c J~~/i~ir ~j~~~ C, a 5~~ ~,y~Qp..~maet..~ ~~~,~ r3~~ /c~t- Si~ature vc ioi ~(~Q t~ ~Q~y„a~~ ~ ~f~to ~~ aPle place rzc. ~ n~ ~~~..-~/~~sf~ 8yaa ~tydc P~ ~~t ,fie 9iT9r (w~ ~1~1F1~ ~~~ .~ ~~ Q ~~~ ~~ ~e~ ~ / ~g(a0 {~JFwI-~ SI, ~~-rA-LoMfFyi~ ~~~ ~~~ ~o~~o~ ~ />~7 ~~ September 11, 1991 Page T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIEWS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNIIiS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LNING EECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PNSIASOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRP-CY AND THAT PFAPLE ARE PRFS[JMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AMID ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS NSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID AND UNFOUNDID. Printed Name'~d~~ Address 'iU ~ ~- ~ ~ ~N-~~ ~~ ~~~.~ ~,Ar.%.~ ~;~~ ~~~~~ - l ~G` u Alder- 7. k;rc~~~ ~ ~ 7~ C-~~ ~~ (~~~~ ~~~s s--.rte ~C~~ _ r ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ Cd~ic~~~. 3~~ CAital~/~'i~ro~c, G `~17~ :<~" S ~SAAopu,r-> ~3/z ~r~kSN/FE ~/'~alFR"^°nx-A, CF . ~ar4~gY9-z~98' ~5~~ Si%~~ SJJpo.• Gt (~ l ice- C~.,.~,-~ ca g17~ ~ y/7~'~ c~gv.,`i8~: September 11, 1 . T0: Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE Page WE THE [JNDERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCIK) CUCAYfONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOOKS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. A5 BUSINESS GWNIItS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SI.ANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AYR) UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROPf EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PHIIASOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE 1?RES[R~D INNOC~TI FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, EffS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YW CAREFULLY REVIES~7 A DECISION THAT SIR YEARS AGO WAS NSTIFIID, BVI TODAY IS BIASID AND UNFOUNDID. Printed Name Signature Address September 11, 1991 Pege T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE ~~ }vr. TtfE UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS ANp~OR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNII,IAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LII~ffTATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. THEBATTITUDSELACIIDN'G BLAME IN ADVANCECON~p BUSINESS F~ORDTHEKACPIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNIIiS (IN 1185 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BE[dEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING P.ECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLFi1S DOES NOT .IUSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY T'H.AT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMEp INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASR THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION 'E4AT SIX YEARS AGO WAS .IUSTIFIID, BU'T TODAY IS BIASED AND UfiFOUNDID. Printed Name ~-~, ~I1/~p j~t~~R1=2 LRO_o_y w. S+~w~.-r ~~ ~~~- Is/Yi G~~9~2ic.~~ S~ tT1C~'I'-~' ~~,-~{~ 11 ~oo~S ~ ~~ /« ~~ ~:~.L Signature Address ~" 7~%~~~ Kl Gal /"u~RTli~v /2h+,~a/f!i ~, , I ~(~ ~ Euuroti~ 8c~ ~ 14'x`' 4 Q tamp ~,~ ~ 2 ~ ~s e~d~, I s ~,2~. ~~ ~ i~~ uPx,~ Oo.~F M~ ~ti~,yy-,~-:, c. 9i7b3 ~ ~ of q5 C~UL;u, AC~Lom~~ ,Cf} 91 ~' ~. ~z~a~z~A«l~,~q,~ 9~ ~~~ ~~ l36`l Mk2~.v~ Au:. CucgMon~/~ 1 Z ~u,2K1NP/= ,I~r , Cv ~ 91 ~~% ~3/ G~c0.,~.,.1CA ~ ~~-~~~ l ~~~ f~~q~ ~j4fiCxl-t/1uG"~~ CA s ~ !-IIZ~JI(fJ ! t ic~-~( S `t V~,~ ~'.~1 ~11:~(~ LW'~PY ///_ {el{ ~ 'F~6nKi n ~ Y! C~ t-Q, ! ~'L~ September 11, 1991 T0: City of Rancho Cu<:amonga FR0~1: See undersigned RE: 5.AM'5 PLACE Page WE THE UNbERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'5 PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE 'IIiE LIh1ITATION OF IKi[IRS T}tE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S, AS BUSINESS OWNIIiS eS~W RESIDENTS OF THE COtPfUNITY, WE WOIII,D LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME TN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (Itd 2985 NO LESS) IS SLANTED, 6ISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTZTUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING P.ECAIISE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT .HJSTIFY THE PFIILOSOPHY THAT WR ARE A Dr240CRACY AND THAT FEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY 4N- STAFE'AND ASK THAT YW CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION 'THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS NSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID eLW UNFOUNDE6. Printed Name ~-- 1 ~~r~'~ ,~~~- ~l! t E r-!,?/t3Z~ S7~'~r~ \ j 'L :v w~ ,~Gr~~vdvJ ,. /~Y~G. HC~I'L_oM At1 ~'t ~r~~~L /•~~7~~ j -~;~~yA Cd~w Y~~~ KF',niYi,.ll ~/L(~ CA R i~.=1T ./ J ~ , ~~, Address --, ~° /u ~s r !ciz~ ~/fig C'~. ~`~~L`'I~c~,~'t~~ ~~l ~~~ ~,'l^r '~'/'~ ~~5~ .Era°~~~.v+,~wt~~ r~"'~.~ C,a~ 'roc :. } 4,c-. ,k,• cry'' ,ictl.' ::~ -i. ~-i' a~> b September 11, 1991 T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE Page ldE THE U':QDERSIGNID ARE FRI&YDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO C[JCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY TS IMPOSING OF SAPf'S. AS BUSINESS OWNII2S AND RESIDENTS OF THE COIMNNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE TfiE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BIISINF_SS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORY AND lIN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LINIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARBTING AN EQUITABLE LIVING P.ECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE PFIILOSOP}1Y THAT WE ARE A DEH7C[tACY AND TSiAT PEOPLE ARE PRESIJP® INTIOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION 'f.YAT SIX YF_4RS AGO IdAS JUSTIFIID, B[TT TODAY IS BIASID AND [ID1F'OUNDID. Printed Name r~?ary ~~;~~~Q~,>y~~~«~ ~r_r)nh-I ~-KEZO~ ~~1,~~ ~ Signature ~;A Address ~-~. Ct I "~ ,,~/ lc 'I ~~Gc,~o~n~,/~,e!/ c~7i Cads ~/4•,, <<l' ,, 3! ~" `-~ `-rte,, c_ ~.- ~'_ ~~n ti. i~ 4z ~ ~~~~ G%G'G? f"''~ i i~ Cato Gh ~`' /icy ~ . c~z.z-;~<+ ~"`~~ -CAL ~ ~ ~~,tp?z~/ ~:~.+~g9 iCHAc'D A S~Hi ~•_ ~~t.~f-zcciQ ~ `~~V l'7'~' ~a `1/7' f:~~ ~,~.-'~a.t~~. 7cN~1 Pn /s11-m` ~n~,4, W q 23: r~r~L, n' ~ ~~ September 11, 1991 T0: City of. Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: S,1M'S PLACE Page WT: TYW UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIEti'DS fu\~/CR CUSTOh1QiS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 C.~1RNE[.IAV STREET, RANCFIO CUCAMONGA, CA. IQE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIhHT.4TI0N OF HOLRS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SM1'S. AS BtiBINESS OWNERS AND REEIDE~iTS OF TIfE COh@tUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE TfiE ATTITUDE OF PLACING Bi,A<~IE IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVi.OUS 0[JNERS (IN 1585 NO LESS) IS SLANTED, DISCRITLINATORX A1'D LN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROhI FAiLNING 4N EOIIIT.4BLE LIVING P.ECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLFiMS DOES NOT NBTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY TF AT WB ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT FE-0PLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCE,~'T FIRSI. WE SL2PORT SAM, HIS FAMILY ANU STAFF AVD ASK THAT YOU CAREFLiC,LY REVIEv A DECISION 'LY4T SIX YEARS AGO WAS J[iSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID AND Ui~iFOUWID. Printed Name"' ~ature ~ A{~-j„ ` LZ~~1~r.ic ~ i " v .~ .~ 4 I~ 1,~ ~~~~ S ~' ,~_.. / ~.~c,t,IS ~4~'~ultiC~,~/ ~~) ~ .~ .~Jl i ~,I /p'i , ~u ~ ~. ~V\i~~~"C~FIE.Z ~~`~~i ~-~~~oov~i (Z~L•-r ~ ~ //lam-~/ / ~----~ ~ ~e¢ak---y ,~ c _ azi.c. w~ ~ ~-~ ~'~~'~ `~. ~~~ yet (? (~ ~ ~ j ~ , ' f;L `-ilivj~ ~1~~1A;~1~ ~UaO~tP~an'~;, U ~ L `~ l SIG i ;- ri yy~ Lvm~~ ~o r~~ ; ~ La~,~ I/ ~{ 17 ~~ k~; f~~ulc A F~~ti, l.~Yv~a <~ ~~ %- ~~zi~ti 0 ~c !~Z ryt c` "~- ~i~.:~'- LJ1 LAnII) Gt Page ~ September 11, 1991 ' ~A ,; i _l~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 15~~e"'S -J~ Signat~e _ ,: Printed Name ~f ~ ~~ /~~ OR CUSTOMERS ,OP SACt S PLACE, 6620 CARNII'I~ OPPOaE T~ LIMITATION OF HOURS STREET,, ~~0 ~CAr1014GA, CA. WE STRONGLY WE S TO STATE WR WOULD OF ~ CITY IS IMPOSING Oh SAM S OF THE COMMUNITY, g FOR THE ACTIONS RESIDENT gUSINFS TORY AND ~- AS BUSINESS OWNERS ~ BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A DISCRII4INA F,ARNING E OF PIA LESS) IS SLANTED' TO BENEFIT FROM ATTITUD (ZN 1ci85 NO S OF PEOPLEDOES ~'Np ~.g9 INNOCEtSf p~REVI0U5 OWNERS TO LIMIT ~F PR ~~ ~~TL~PpPLE ~N ~~ ~ LIVING p~,ECAUSE ~ A A DFMO~' YW C~LI3 ~UNF'OUNDID• pHI7pSOPHY TNP ~ TpDAY IS BIAS ~ ~ ~~ STAFF FIRST. SAGO ~~~ ,7USTIFIID, IDT ~ STJPPORT SAN, HZS FAMILY ANO ~ ~ LypT SIX YEAR Address ~- DECISION ~; SAM GN®~ pRIENDS T0: City of Rancho Curamonga FROM: See undersigned ,g PLACE ~ // ~~«~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~1 ~`~~ l G!. I Fr. 6 ~P r~ . ~ r ~' ~y/ -L'. .:,c~ ~ Y ~~ wl r cr n v ~ ~~'N1.~Q..l. ~~, ~~ ~3~' ~(1?`6b ~-~`~, , ~l~'~c /" ~tT~ ~nN~/l %% ~~//~ TiMe'rH H, 0/~I~0 !~a(~µC (~ v.~ ~r~~ £. ~~ ~e«/wp°'' a~ X03 6" ~Zsy arti~~'r ~ao~, , 9CTw <<'.tiaCs, 9r7er September 11, 1991 Page T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HOURS T'HE CITY IS IMPOSIhT. Oh SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF T'HE COMMUPFITY, HE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PI ACIAG BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR Tf~ ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS Sr.nn:m~i, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING P.ECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PNTLOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CARFFfrtty REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TDDAY IS BIASID AND UNFOUNDID. F /3~oZ6 /~ke.J~->f~r1e (~~ ~~ ~~~?~ ~--~-=~ _ ~~(_ ~GL G ~ ~~ CC J~tCr_/ ~ SrnS+~r,« 7~~ ~cria 1=r~a, ~ q~ c 3 ~'s-o dbtts'4~c~n~ bQ k~J~~2s;r~- q-~sz~ ~S7! her/~~,~~. ~'rl ~ 4..u`4'~ 9 w ov / G!-~ ~ a`G r c, n~ci~,~~L~% C c i%~.,~i September 11, 1991 G~ Page T'0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE FIE T1iE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE TIIE LIMITATION OF HOURS 1TD: CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF TfD; COMMfRQITY, WE WOULD LIKE T.'0 STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR TfO; ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTED, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING P.ECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PfLTLOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK 'THAT' YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION 'GYAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS NSTIFIID, BUP TODAY IS BIASID ANp UNFOUNDED. Printed Name- Signature Address -~~~<<-~ n~ ~ ~s~rfrn ~-~t~. ~~31 c~ . F°s < < i ~'~ ~,.. ~.~~ ~.~., ~ - ter- ~~`~-~> I V;ai ci Ic ~;~~,,~ {~ (,t ~ Nu,viti-L1 ~- ~ ~~,~; f~ja ~ ~,~h~ti~urlD ~NN~~~;~ 9ytis C~~l1~wr~ ~ ~. c~. ~ia~. ~;~ ~ ~%~, ~, l~~v'I) ~2Rwra~!~ ~~5~~i!~~~lYt~~~,n '~ .'~ I //~~`1c=11.-- / C~ ~j~- ~~~~N ~ ~ Ivb ~ ~~~~ ~/ - ~_.~.e ( { s~{7~ . Il. 1 Page __ T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROPf: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE 13iE UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS AND/OR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE TAE LIMITATION OF HOURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACIA*G BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR 1fIE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTED, DISCR1HINpTORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING EECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE P2+SLOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND TAAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMID INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK 1NAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION '1TIAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BL9SID AND UNFOUNDID. Printed Name Signature ~fherece ~-rcc~~ M~h.~Q, ~.~ Toga 1. tt~~~r,v~ ( ~~, ((~~ ~ IgqC01 Ql1~.rlE-t _. I~dZU~~ ~~-~tAn--I~ -~ - l~l,~f~t~r ~~~~- _ ~nt6~~y ~ Y'bbeifs 'V ~ V`~-l.J~~W ~~~b Address IS~~ (~QkW0.^~ I~ . ,sz ss Chu «cc~~ 'h 1~z~( ~~~«~ ~~ ~L /ANC NU C/Cq MONC^^~ ¢A' d ya~~~ ~~2~ ~!~ s~ ~~ 1i 997 dh49 i5 L""Erva.f+la~ ~„ 7/ 1l ~~l`~/Z~, ~ ',-.~" ~_s.,s~ ~0~~ T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SMt'S PLACE, 66. STREEI, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIPffTATION OF THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COPI^RP.VITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACIA'G BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANIID, DISCRIMNATORY ACID UN- CONSTITVIIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BECIEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUZTABI.E LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLELS DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PHITASOPHY TNAT WE ARE A DPPIOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAC1, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YDU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BTASID AND UtFWNDID. G1nc.2~ ~ I~ tw/,y~~4 i~~i~`~/ ~~b~i'S ~ ~ ~~~, un~aQ/o d ~I Printed Name Sigiature Address ~ ..~ u, 1.._ T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE 'IIiE UNDERSIGNID ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOMERS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCHO CUCANONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HDURS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OFiNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE CO[MNhTITY, WE WOULD LIKE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLANTED, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT NSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT FIRST. ivc SUPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO IJAS JUSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BLASID AND UNFOUNDED. Sept;mber Il, 1991 I0: City of Rancho Cuczmcngz FROM: See undersio ed RE: SA:~1'S PLACE 'rage [rE Lhe L1TILRSIG\~ ARE FRZ~=S .l\"D/~~R CL'STO~I~RS OF 5?`",'S PLACE, 662G C.~lR.\TI.I:~: .STRE£:'~ R:1.\CHO CLC:1~10\G:\~ CA. {rE S~O:iGLY OPPO:;' ~ LI~IIZATION OF HOLl25 ZHE CITY IS IMPOSIFG 0~ S=_•1':. AS E::.`.I -ESS G~nti'Fi?5 :l\U RESiC~: CS OF 'CHE COI^IL?iilY, Ir'E ~:OIJLD LIKE TO STATE i}fE ATTID~DE OF PLAC I>'G BL\)_ iV .ACC?VCE OY A BCS P.T<a FOR THE ACTIONS OF ?RE:IOC.9 Oh1'ER$ RV 19°~ ::0 _ESS) Ii SLAti IED, DISC.',h?:1TORY a:VD hii- CO'<STIZ'.'LIO\AL. IO LI)(IT T'r3 RIGis:'S OF PEGPLE i0 3E`.~IT FRO?( EA[LCISG :LV .CI'IL48LE LIY'I\'G 3ECAi:_'c P PRICR PROBL~G DOES \Gi JtiSTIFY THE PHi'~~SOk:`?Y I'.-taT ~.'E AP,` :1 :_t:CP ~.CY .~.\TJ THAT PEGPLE 4P~ PP.ESL~® IVKOCFv\'C FIRST. n'E _L?POP,T SA:•1, H?S F:_!iL': ':_i SZ?.F:' .i.\Ti :liK IF:iI ':OL~ :'?JiER,i,LY REl'?E?ti A JEC:SiO~ THAT SIr YEARS ?,C-0 ~~?S JtiSTIFIEG, 807' TODAY .S BIAScD A\~ l'FOL:-DEJ. 2rint^d `Came Sig.:a[ure ;'_dress Se , 11. .. ~. Page T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSI@C® ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOC4TtS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, RANCF[0 CUCACANGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE LIMITATION OF HM7R5 THE CITY IS T SIhG ON SAM'S• AS BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COCAtUNITY, WE WOULD LIRE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADVANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNERS (IN 1985 NO LESS) IS SLACIPED, DISCRIMINATORY AND UN- CONSTIT[,TIIONAL. TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FRIXd EARNING AN EQUITABLE LIVING BECAUSE OF PRIOR PROBLEMS DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE PHILOSOPHY THAT WE ARE A DEMOCRACY ACID THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESU[~D INNOCENL FIP.ST. WE SLPPORT SAM, HIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS JUSTIFIID, BITT TODAY IS BIASID AND UbiFOUNDID. . 11, .», Page T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersigned RE: SAM'S PLACE WE THE UNDERSIGVED ARE FRIENDS AND/CR CUSTOigRS OF SAM'S PLACE, 6620 CARNELLAN STREET, RANCEiO CUCAMONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOS°_ Tf1E LIMITATION OF HGLBS THE CITY IS IMPOSING ON SAM'S. AS BUSINESS OWN17tS AND RESID~ITS OF THE CO*41[R'TITY, WE SvOULD LIRE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BLAME IN ADbANCE ON A BUSINESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PREVIOUS OWNIItS (IN I985 NO LESS) IS SLANTID, DISCRIMINATORX AND UN- CONSTITUTIONAL. TO LIMIT~.TI~ RIGITTS OF PEOPLE TO BENEFIT FROM E.AR:~-ING AN EQUITABLE LNING BECAUSE ~OF PRIOR PROBLE*IS DOES :TOT NSTIFY TEfE PHIIpSOPfPi THAT NE ARE A DE1dUCRACY AND THAT PEOPLE ARE PRESUt~D INNOC~T FIRST. WE SUPPORT SAPf, FIIS FAMILY AND STAFF AND ASK THAT YOU CAREFULLY REVILlti A DECISION THAT SIX YEARS AGO WAS NSTIFIID, BUT TODAY IS BIASID AND U17FOUPIDID. G Sact~mter 11, 1991 T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FG'".: See wdersi; ied 3.E: SA:4'S PUCE Paee '.vc .% i1UERS IG\~ ARE FRIE.VTS A.\D/u^R CUSTOMERS OF SA'+.'S PLACE, 66?0 CAPuvII.I ~\ ~TP. `_'~T, Rd.\CHO Cf:CA:~tG\GA, Ca. WE 5?RONGLY OPPOSE 7iE LI.KITATIOY OF HOWRS IIiF =IT_Y IS I~ffCSI\8 ON S?9'S. -~.: =:=S i:vr55 OIv~I:FS A.\'D RESIC~"CS OF TfiE COF^ICINITY, I7E ::OULD LIKE TO ST_gTE T_ AT'I'TIL-DE OF PLACI`:G E_4v- IV ADI-:±NCE ON A BUSI\'ESS FOR THE ACTIONS OF %c :TOGS 06tiER5 (IV 1985 `:0 _E55) IS SLAN1'm, DISC2L`L~i4TOP.Y 9,VD lV- =IIILTOS?! . TO LIMIT IF? RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO 3E\~IT FRO^I E?2VING ~v0: '_~"iT.;3LE LA'ISG HECACSE OF PRIOR PROHLE^1S DOES SGT :IUSTIFY P.!E ".~=~OPF;i IY 1T '~T AP.t A LE~P:CR::CY :1hD THAT PEOPLE t4_ PRESL?® I\~iOCENT FT SI. :.~~ wTPORT S:L'~I, 3IS F? OILY ?\Z~ STAFF A.VD :LSK TH.1T YOC CPREF7.LY RE4IE[J A DE::SIG\ THAI Sit YE1RS =C-0'nA5 .IUSIIFIED, BUT TODAY .S BIASED .h\U L"VFOI".~:Fi~. ri-._ed Sax SiT afore ;dress I/ie:vv. hlOn~/.[5 AYLer^+-.- 7l'Ir,~:..,li ~,,,,~ wr+•• ~ v September 11, 1991 T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See ~dersigned RE: Si~M'S PLACE liE 'IHE DVGERSIG\'F.D APw FRI`-~\~DS 'TREET R?\CHO C[;CA`10*:>•A, CA_ Pafe ~\U/CR CtiST02ffRS OF c?y~g PL:1CF., 66?0 C.APVELL4S w'E SIRO::GLY OPPGSE 7{F. LIFIIT-'1TION OF HOLRS J Tl{E CITY IS I`iPOSiNG ON SA. =. CC`CIUNITY, lvR :vOULD LIKE TO STATE _. V AD4ANCE ON A BIiSP.. ~=- FOR ZHE ACTIONS OF AS BLSISFSS Gtvl'ERS A\~ REoID~TS OF 'L}tEE DLSC-'.I. _ .ryATORY A:`U L'N- THE ATTIIL~iE OF PL~CIC;G &,0 ~~55) IS SLh\TID, PRNIGtiS Of.'NEP.S (IN 1985 RIGIILS OF PEGPLE TO 3E•-SIT FRO?I EASING CG\STIIUTIONAI.. IO LI:~1IT TPA AN SQ~;IT-•1BLE LIVI\G BECAC-J~AC~~ R PROBLE`1S DOES \GT .R.''STI 4\D IAaT PEOPLE AR PRESI'~lID INNCCE\T 7HILOSOPHY THaT l"E ;lliE A FIRST. air ~~ TYFF :V\T ?.SK TfLaT YGti CAREFIT.LY P,R'IElJ A S .,vT SCFPGP,I S:Ci, HIS F. _t_LY DECISION 'gi4T SIN yFAP.S Ar'0 ~'L~ J[:sTIFIED, BLT T_OCAY :S BIASED A-\'D LT.:FOLT~ .:a.e~s Sep_ember 11, 1991 Pese IO: City of Rancho Cuczmcngz FP,C);: See undersigned P.E: SA?I'S PUCE "?~' -'+E LtiUERSIGNED ARE FRSE\IS AND/CR CUSIO.MERS OF SA`I'S PLACE, 6620 CAR\II.1 AN S ~:=i, R4\CHO CCC.3:`IONGA, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOS°~ LI*tIT.4TI0N OF HOLRS TIC CITY IS I"1POSING ON g]~[~_, i.= =!.Si\"ESS C[r,ITRS .~'t\"C RESICITS OF THE CO"Lr1UNITY, [rE :;OUI.D LIKE TO ST.4IE X AITITCTIE OF PL4CIi:G E~.[;rr- IN :1DVA;NCE ON A EUS I:rESS FOR THE ACIIONS OF PP=: i~iUS OIrS;RS (, IN 1985 ::0 =ESS) IS SLAT\TED, DI3C3I?L^iATORY arm C\- CCSSTSILTIO:;AL. TO Li:?II T}G RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO BE:.7FIT FROi1 EARVISG .?.\' C~i~IL16LE LIVING BECACSE )F PRIOR PROELE4C~ DOES ,NOT J[iSTIFY T}it' Pri: _OSOP:Ti TH-.T !rT ARE A OE^};CRaCY AND TILaT PEOPLE ARE PRESL~1Ep I\''XOCLIiT FiF;T. [~e ~LPPORT 5?.1, His E-_IILY ?_Tl STAFF AND ASK TH4T YOC CAREFCI,LY RWIEW A DECISION TrL4T SIX YE?ag _gp ;~ NSTIFIED, BUT TOCaY IS BIASED A.\'D LRdF'ODUED. ~ Sep[eriber 11, 1951 Page T0: Ci[y of Rancho Cucamcnga FROM: See undersigned RE: SA~`1'S PLACE n'E Tf{E L17i ERSIG\-ED ?RE FRI1~.S ?..VD/CR CfiSTO^R"RS OF SP_`!'S PACE, 6620 CAR\'ELIA\ STP.EET, R4\CHO C[:CA`10\GA, CA. WB S1R0\GLY OPPO;i.°, ~-ff LIFffT_~IZON OF HOCl2S I}tE CITY IS I"fPOSIX'G OV S.A.M'S. ?S BLBI\cSS OWiJ13S A1D RES ILITS OF THE CO`CICtiIIY, (v~ ::OULD LIKE TO STATE IHF ATTIIL'DE OF PLACItiG B-4`= IN .1DL'?SCE OH A BI;SI~-E:: FOR ~ ACTIOYS OF FP,EGIDCG OI,VERS (IV 1585 `;0 1ESS) IS SLATED, DI5C3I`^;ATORY ?\U L1- CO`;STIILTIOSAL. TO LI>QT Tr_. RIGHTS OF PEOPLE IO 3E`~=: IT FRO?! [:1PSI\G AS EUIIT.ABLE LIGIVG BECACSE JF PRICR PROBCEIS COES SC'~T .T[.'STIFY THE FHiL~: SOPH'i iHAT i.-E ARE A J~!;CFGICY ;1:\U THAT PEOPLE .4F- PRESI'.~~D I\XOC E\T FIP.ST. `.,E SLPPORT SA?I, HIS F.4YILY ..=.U STAFr' :L\U ASK THAT YCC C.~.REF. SLY RE4'IESd A DECISIGS THAT SIX YE4P.S A,0 'rAJ' JfiSTIFIED, BUT TODAY IS BIASED A.'dD L?FOI:DED. ?rioted `:amp Sic azure address Sep[e~ber 11, 1991 Pale __ 20: Ci[y of Rancho Cucamcngz F.°.OM: See undersia ed RE: S:1N'S PLACE ?vE ^~ LI.~DERSIG\ED ARE FRI EIS A.W/~;R CUSTO^fERS OF S?~I'B PLACE, 6620 CAR.~r'T, LA.\ STREET, RANCHO C[;C:1v(ONf,A, CA. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE TFIE LIFIIT:ITION OF HOLRS i}fE CITY I6 IMPOSING ON SAM'S. "~ BLSi\ESS 0?vITRS ,L\D RES LCLITS OF T}fE CO>@IGIi "ITY, [vT :rOliC,D LIKE TO STATE IIiE .aTTTPUE OF PL•1CI\G ELAMt IN A.^,6",I.YCE OY A BUSI\E:S FOR THE ACTIONS OF PP.EVi0L~5 OF\'E,'F.S (IS 1981 `:0 r~SS) IS Sk4\TED, DISCRI>L'tiATORY .A:VD L?4- COSSTIZTiOMAL. TO LI:1IT Tf= RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO EE\s IT FROi•I EARNING .AN EQUILABLE LIVING BECACSE CF PRIOR PROBL@i5 DOES SOT JCSTIFY THE PHi i•'~SO^r•~{Y PrG1T ~E .ARE A =~E`CCRACY :LVD THAT_ PEOPLE 4RE PRESLTIED IN::OCENT FIRSI. .vE SCPFOP,T SA'-0, HIS F2SfILY ..`.7 STAFF ANU ASK THAT YCl" CAREFLT.LY REl'IEIr' A DECISIGN TH~IT SI!i YEAPS AA ,;.AS JUSTIFIED, BUT TODAY rg BIASED AND L".aFOL'.~UED. Prin[zd `:are Sio a[ure =ddress T0: City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: See undersio ed RE: SAM'S FLACE !SE t}{E U~TiERSIG\TD ARE FRIEI,S A<\~/CR CL`STOPIERS OF S?4'S PLACE, 6620 CARVEL.L1.1 STP,EPC, R4\CHO CI~CA~tOi`~',A, Cd. [7E STRO\GLY OPPOSS I;{E LIPIITATION OF HOGRS THE CITY IS IMPOSZYG OY 5_~1N'S. .~1$ dI:SI~RSS OIr~II25 ,LVD RED IL~7'S OF II{E CO?PIL?bIIY, !dE !rOIiI.D LIKE TO STAIE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING B-~vT IN ADI-.~NCE OY A BUST`: SS FOR THE ACTIONS OF PP,El'iOUS Olv;dERS (IV 1485 i:0 ASS) IS SLA.\TED, DISCRIMIY.ATORY A:\~ Ll- GO'~STITLTIOYAL. IO LI)III IF3 RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO 3EIIFII FROM FA'~i\ING AN :QUIT.ABLE LIVISG BECACSE )F PRIOR PROBL~LS DOES SC/I JUSTIFY THE PH:iOSOPHY TrLiT [.'E ARE A J&`YCRACY A\~ THAT PEOPLE AA.E PRESL~® IV'~OCE\"L FIRST. .. e. SI:YPO.:T SArt, HIS PAvLTLY :-t7 STAFF A\U ASK Tfi~T YOL' CAREfL'LLY REl%IEIv A DECISION T:-L4I SI:( YE4R5 AGO ~.:dS JUSTIFIED, BLT IOL_aY IS BIASc'.D A.\'D L~: FOL:~ED. Printed ::a~a Si~a[ure Address • Sepcamber 11, 1991 yO; Pity of Rancho CucamcnS~ 2%5 fi?OM: See undersigned ~ , Para _ RE: 5.12P5 PLACE ~,v'E -T Lti-DtZtS IG~~D ARE FRIG=S AVD1CR LTJ5T0"fERS OF S.4`I'S PLACE; 6620 C.dR.\"ELLAN STPi~T, Pr'i\CHO CI:CA.`lOrGa, Cd. fvE SIRONGI.Y OPPOSS =+'(E LZ*SIT_AIION OF HOLES '}fE QTY IS I'.1PGSItiG ON SA.M'S. 1,S ?LSi`,`c5S O(r;VERS ?~~ RE.SIC_`+IS OF T.1~ CG`f1LMTY, (r'E iiOliLD LIKE IU ST4TE ?I{E AIIIZL'DE OF PLACING EL~`= Iti AD6'A.VCE OY A BUSII"ESS FOR TfiE AC'CiONS OF PP.=: iOCS Cdv'\ERS fIti 2981 ':0 .,,5) IS SLANS`.7~, DISCRDL^iATORY A.\U Lti- GG`SIIilTIOtiAL. TO LS`[TI g.? RIGHIS OF PEOPLE TO ?6Cfs IT ER6;•f E~1RVS)~G A.\ .,y~~iT.ABLE LIYI\G BECAL_~`CRA~ ~\URTN-aT PFAPLE :•P` PP.ES~.tE6 I~-OC~Z Pri:_tiOPHY SHAT FE ARE 3 FI':t• -,.r ::?POP,I SA`1, NSS F?_`tI LY =.T1 ST.AFF .L\'G ASX T}LAT YCU CAREFLtLY REl%I v . DECS.:LO'v IlLAT SSY :'E.AFS A~~'•~AS JC;STIFIED, BLT TODAY IS HIASED A\U L:FOL`9ED. . .. c,.-.~.,,.~ ~cdress ~ :em - 11, .0: City of Rancho Cucamongz :RON: See undersigned RE: SA.`1'S PLACE S.I.~t.Z LR~~}{O~C~Atp ~I ~TJ WED3TAOIDGLYOP~POoOF~,1LIMITATION60F HOUR3ID~ THE CITY IS I"fPCiSING ON S.1`f'S. AS `fiSIV'ESS Oi.^~S AND RES ZCETS OF T.}{E CO*1`NNiTY, WE IdOULD LIRE TO STATE THE ATTITUDE OF PLACING BL~M-` IY AD4:~IVCE ON A BUST'IES= FOR IFtE ACTLOYS OF %RE,ZOU5 0{v1'ERS (I:i 1985 `-~O `_'c5S) IS SLANZID, DLSC3I`.CVATORY 4:U LN- COS:TIIL~ION.AL. TO LI:7IT TF~ RIGHTS OF PEOPLE TO 3E.'~7F- IT FROi1 EARNING -4V TQUIT.4BLE LI4IVG BECACSE ':F PRIOR PROBLELS DOES NOT .R75TIFY THE 2hi_OSOPNY THAT I ~ ARE A Ls-`1:CRACY VD TILaT PEOPLE ARE PRESL~® INNOCENT FIF:i• ~ v ~~,T STAFF AN'D ASii THAT YCI: CAREFLII.Y REVIF?d A nL _iJPPORT S:~'., HIS FAIILY OEC=SION THAT SIX YEAF.S AGO ~+'.?S JIiSTIFIED, BUT TODAY IS BIASED A.\U L'.FOI::?JED• S ira[ure ?3dress ?rin[=_d Name - T~ v Lewis Homes Management Corp. '_T II36 Nash Mom®A~®e/P.O.aoa 670/Uplmd, CYi(omi~ 917833 W8 71/,985-0971 P.VC: 71~/W9fi100 h ~ October 31, 1991 '~ "~~; ~ `' ~ 3 1 1991 xayor Dennis L. stout °~ "~~`~~i, and xambers of the City council City of Rancho Cucamonga ,~.~--r-~_~ 10500 Civic Center Dr. , Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 - ~~ Re: xulti-Family Design Standards Dear Mayor Stout and xembera of the City Council: Since April, 1991, Lewis Homes has participated in a joint effort by the private sector, City staff and the Planning Commission to amend various development standards and design guidelines for aulti-family residnntial districts. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to provide our input. The results of this very exhaustive and detailed analysis are now before you for your consideration. We support the proposal/recommendation and complement staff and the Planning Commission for their efforts. There is, however, a procedural issue regarding implementation of the new standards that warrants a "policy clarification": Staff has consistently stated that the new standards would R4E be applied to projects that have been previously approved-- i.e., with Tentative Tract xap end Design Review approvals. However, its been suggested that if extensions of approvals ere requested, then some or all of the new standards may be applied. We have a number of projects in Terre vista that fall into this category (see attached, Exhibit "A"). The potential confusion lies in the different developer action(s) required to toll the expiration of a Tentative Tract Map (recording the map) as compared to tolling the expiration of a Design Review approval (pulling building permits). We understand that getting the Tentative Tract Map recorded only takes care of the map itself, whereas the Design Review approval could "technically" be considered to have expired if building permits have not been obtained, even if the Tract Map has recorded! Mayor Dennis L. Stout and Members oP the City Council October 31, 1991 Page 2 Me are confident that it was never the intent to enforce such a forfeiture oP rights where the developer has shown good faith (and a very significant economic coaitment) 6y poatinq bonds and recording the Tract Map. Nevertheless, this technical inconsistency, in theory, could cause some confusion-- espeeinlly in the ^slow aerkat^ environment we are now experiencing. We are simply asking that the Council clarify the intended application of the new Multi-family Design Standards so it is clear that timely recordation of a Tract Map would toll the expiration of the Design Review approval as well as the Tentative Map approval. (This would, o! course, not apply where a developer seeks voluntarily to emend a Design Review approval by significantly redesigning a project. In that case, application of the new standards would bQ at the discretion of the Planning Commission). Me have solicited and received staff support !oz this clarification. Thank you for yauz consideration. LEMIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. By: tr.~' a-r Jose h M Oleson ~~ Vic President Senior Project Nanager JMO:kek cc: Rick Gomel Brad Buller 4 i ~~ ~~ ~ ~ t~ S f ~~ ~ ~E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a o 6 a s z p F ~ 3 ~i a w ~~ ~4A' 3 ?~ Ad A •~ W D a gggg b ~ a a ~ ~ YY Ss °R # 8E ~ ~° '~R ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ss ~~ ---- C11'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM jam: DATE: Nov tuber 20, 1991 Tb: yor and Members of the City Council FRO Brad Buller, City Planner SU ECT: Multi-Pami ly General Plan Amendments A Lathed for your use during this evening's heerings are suggeeied formate for the Htiwande (yellow paper) and Vic[ozia (blue) General Plan Amendments along with recoamendnLlon charts sumsarizing the actions taken so far on theca matters. The Resolution and Ordinance numbers to adopt the Planning Comieeion'e recommendations for eech euberea are listed on the racro~endations charts. BB: mlq Attachments ETIINANDA GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS Suppeatod Meeting Format F.7 GPA91-028 (ESPA91-03j §~ '~ ~+ r cc Discmaion action/Vob Step Oueetiona on . yzV s s ~ n ~~ ~ '~ ~ " s ~ Subaea 3(1j S b 5 3 Prsaenhtian PreasntNion ~ -~t 3 ~svr~, a~ > ~~ r "~..€ .~'~~`: :>r•?. u sea ( ) Subsea 7(5) ~ "x' ::~ ~.s „°~,'3'„';;. ':fi, Subarea 98 / / v r ~AO~Q GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND APPROVALS AUGUSi'91 APPLICATIONS Low LAND USE ALTERNATVES CONSIDERED Low Medium Medium Commercial Office GPA 90-028 ~ • /// GPA 91-01A ~ '~ • /// GPA 91-028 Subarea 1 O Subarea 2 ~ • /// • /// SuWrea 3• Ras. 91-204 Res. 91.205 Subarea 4 ~ • /// ' `". r;...gr: Subarea 5• ~ ~ ~ .: . Rea. 91.208 Rea. 91.209 Subarea 5 0 ..: ~ ~ ~ 0 Res. 91-212 oro. as3 Subarea 9• Mal PONOa ~ J ~ ..,' J" ' '9~ryc'. Rea. 91-213 Res. 91-214 wart portltat ~ m ~E~' '., u:d'<~°`?Y:" Rea. 91.213 Ord. 454 existing desipna9on, as of May, 1991 QPlanninp Commisaion recommende5one - Mey'91 b •AUpuN V1 /// Cily GOUrICII Appmvala, July 51 _i N r z w m ~ E ~ LL 3 w ~5 w6 C Z m y 9 ~ ~ J A Q ~ W ~ Z~ W ~ M 0 0 m m 4 LL ~ ~ N 0 r a 0 w O U W 3 (.. m Z W G] Q 0U O Q a J a J Q Q W Z W U 8 0 r 8 c m 2 E r mm v m d ~'O Q 0 ~ c m E E n m n °r' c v o °i 2 ~ m0 E ~ E 0 U m ~ c c m a 0 rn 0 W ~ y N ~i d m c 8 c 3 J Z 0 Q U J a a Q m U ~ Wry LL (7 Z ~ Yry .~Jp ~Q m ~ ~ ~ N ~ m d 0 m N m ~+ B 8~ B B B B~ P~~~ B N y N y (~ N N N N N N N L. Lewis Homes Management Corp. '' \ 1156 Notal Mowtain A~rnue / P.O. Box 670 / Up1aPA, Cali(orttie 91745-5008 71dry85-0971 FAX: 714N49~6700 ~ ~ October 31, 1991 ~~ ~~ ~ 3 1 1991 /i - /' \ , Mayor Dennis L. Stout ~~~~ and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mayor Stout and Members of the City Council: On October 16, 1991, the Council considered staff and Planning Commission recommendations to amend Title 17, Chapter 17.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to eliminate compact parking spaces and reduce the standard size parking space to 8.5 feet by 18 feet. After the staff presentation and public testimony, the Council engaged in considerable discussion regarding the proposed width (i.e. 8.5 feet) of the new standard size parking space. Significantly, the discussion focused on that issue in the context of high turnover retail/commercial applications. it was suggested that a width of 9.0 feet would be more consistent with the City's desire to promote its progressive image and to enhance the users' sense of comfort and convenience while shopping in Rancho Cucamonga. We must respectfully respond that the extensive statistical data reviewed by your Planning Commission, your staff, the Chamber of Commerce sub-committee, and various private-sector entities indicates that the stated goal would be well served by the 8.5 feet width proposal. we believe the analysis clearly shows that ±99$ of the vehicles in Rancho Cucamonga would be generously accommodated by the Planning Commission recommendation. Unfortunately, due to the focus on the retail/commercial applications, a very important facet of the analysis was not fully considered at your October 16th public hearing. Lewis Homes conducted a survey of residential projects within the City. The information obtained supports the vehicle size conclusions noted in the Staff Report and the Planning Commission recommendation. Moreover, the Planning Commission and staff have acknowledyed that residential applications would represent a low turnover, less intense scenario. Logically, residents would be familiar with the established parking arrangements and would more likely park for~the entire day and/or night. This would therefore lead to the conclusion that compact spaces would be appropriate in residential projects. We understand that the benefits of a "one size fits all" parking space (i.e. simplification of site planning and enforcement/conflict elimination) override the arguments for compact spaces where in the City. We therefore ask you to consider the 8.5 feet by 18 feet standard size parking space proposal for residential projects. This request is directly related to another item on tonight's agenda (November 6, 1991). The proposed revisions to the Multi-Family Design Standards are the product of an exhaustive series of meetings, workshops, and public hearings with your staff and Planning Commission (we sincerely appreciate the opportunity to have participated in that process and we are proud of the result). Critical elements of the Multi-Family Design Revisions--most notably building separations and setbacks--were worked out based on a good-faith reliance on the 8.5 feet by 18 feet standard parking stall. It was, for us, a basic premise of the discussions., The 8.5 foot by. 18 foot stall was considered "land-use neutral" as it approximates the same area needed for parking under the currently existing compact space/standard space provisions. Therefore, we feel a significant portion of the multi-family design proposal is now compromised if a standard space of 9 feet by 18 feet is adopted for residential projects. To conclude, we ask that you consider a revision to the proposed amendment to Title 17, Chapter 17.12 of the Municipal code to provide for a standard parking stall size in residential districts of 8.5 feet wide by 18 feet long. Thank you for your consideration. LEWIS HOIMES MANAGEMEN^T C/OjRP. J seph M. Oleson Yice President Senior Project Manager JMO:ksk ec: Rick Gomez Brad Buller ,aNCHO (a1CA,CITY' OP 71 '30 229 3900 03 CC Z AD1'IYB 01111l6I s''~h6 96RYL BLT9 MTR P0276-012671 FSR 51 CREW RATE GS•2 oUCAMNOA CA 91730 CACI NONB ABNAINC F " + " " " " " NAME OYRRFLOW AND MAILING ADDR " " " " " " " " NAME OVERFLOH - HAIL ADDRESS 2 - P 0 RO% d07 NAIL ADDRE98 1 NERITAOS PARK MAIL ADCAE3S 3 - CUCAMNOA CA 91719 ALT PN •- ENTER TRANSACT20N CODE- SCEOOOd) 11/30/91 15:17: t5 APPLIC~CICSTOR2,D-ID~EAV~TERMeAVZ7~VTAN~bOld 60• ~. 'j G .,,..,nom w~n,~.,s ud i1 30 229 3dOd C1 l,~ 2 ACTIVE 04/22/A1 546 BERYL dL'f9 MTR P0276.012871 FSR 54 CREW RATE tl6.1 U6iiMNCP. CA 9:730 CACI NONE PENDING " " " " " " ~ " ACCC ONT9 BILLING XISTO RY " " " " " PACE 1 READ FEAR HILL METER Nb NWH DAILY TOTAL DATE CODE CODE READ GAYS USAGE AVO 9ILLED .1 10/29/91 1 6077 32 )440 132.4 1272.10 ;2 09/27/91 1 7953 30 3120 114.0 2046.31 ,3 08/20/91 1 0 7896 30 25BC 86.0 1115.25 7t a7/29/91 1 7p53 32 3540 110.6r 1107.90 ;5 06/27/91 1 7794 2B p280 T95~7 T430,59 i6 05/30/91 1 7636 31 9420 309. 9~ 1490.32 :~ 04/29/91 T )199 31 15060 485.8' 2012.59 i8 07/29/91 7248 29 10080 347,6 1544,57 .9 02/18/91 1 7080 30 4140 138 0 912.95 U 01/29/91 1 7011 72 612D 191.3' 877,21 .: 12/28/90 1 690! 30 5940 198 0, 796.51 2 11/2Bf 90 1 6810 30 7380 246.0 933.75 3 10/29/90 1 6687 33 7320 221.8' 1088.08 MI OHLIGHT ED AMOUNTS MAY NOT REFLECT TOTAL DIGLLD EACTIVE METER NUM BER- - MULTIPLIER- KNM MULTIPLIER- 60 .NPER 'f RANEACTION CODE OR PROINC RLOVEET- CE000B) 11/18/91 :5,16: 56 gPPLI O=CICETOR2,OPI0 =EA V ,TERM•AVL7 ,VTAM•0018604 ;546 BHRYt ELiS 'U~AMNGA CA 9177C . 1 + + ! 1 + i i REAL GATE :3 10/29/91 ~2 09/27/91 i3 08/28/91 ~A 07/29/91 'S 06/27/91 8 05/30/91 '! G6/29/91 q 03/29/91 9 02/25/91 0 0:/29/91 1 :2/28/90 ]. 1:/28/90 3 10/29/90 OENAND REAq 1.70 T.80 1.38 1.21 2.83 2.88 2.76 2.83 2,68 1,37 1.31 3.36 1,31 r, iV ::: iJVi v• Vu L Ab~.VZ MTR P0276~012871 F8R 54 CREW RATE CAOI NONE PENDING ACCOUNT? 9ILLINC HISTORY + + + • OEMANO KW aILL KW 102.0 102.0 S6tl.0 168.0 42.5 83.0 72.8 73.0 369.5 170,0 172.E 173.0 165.6 166.0 169.8 170,0 160.E 161.0 ez.: 8T,0 7E.6 71.0 81.6 82.0 78.6 79.0 44/22/87 cs•2 • PACE z EAOTiV£ MET EA NUMBER- - BULTIPLI6q• AWH MULTIPLIER- vTER TRANSACTION CODE OR PAGING REQUEBT- 60 ~: 1:0008) 11/18/91 15117,06 APP GIO•cfC5TCR2,OPI0•EAV,TERM •AV27,VTAM •0014606 NO'JEMEER 20, 1991 MR. MRVOR, MEMEEHS OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL. MY NRME IS EOE OLRRI I LIVE RT 9637 MPNZRNITR DR. RRNCHD CUCRMGNGP, CR. I HRVE COME HERE TONIGHT q5 R CONCERNED CITIZEN, R MEMEER GF THE RLTR LOMB LITTLE LEPOUE EORRD OF DI P.EGT'J RS, PPID R MEMEER OF THE SPORTS RDVISORY COUNCIL FGR THE CITY OF RRNCHD CUCRMONGR. SINCE ERRLV IN 1991, I HRVE F'R RTICI F'RTED IN MONTHLY SPORTS RDVISORY COUNCIL MEETINGS. RLONG WITH OTHER RGENDR ITEMS, WE HRVE DISCUSSED SOME OF THE TOF'I CS CONTRINED IN THE "GRIFFITH COST RECOVERY STUDV" THRT VOU RRE CONSIDERING THIS EVENING. WL' WERE RDVISED THRT R STUDY WAS COMMISSIONED RS RGG!UIRED C+`/ THE STRTE GF CRLIFORNiR TO IDENTIFY COSTS THRT MRY EE RECOVERED FROM SF'ECiFIC USER GROUP'S. WE WERE NEVER GIVF_N COPIES OF THE STUDY, EUT WERE LED T^ EELIEVE TF'PT THE VIEWS G'RESENTED TO US WERE THRT OF THE STUDV RS WELL RS STUFF. THESE DISCUSSIONS WERE CENTERED PROUND THE FRCT THRT THE ~ENL'ftRL FUIJD OF THE CITY ^F RRNCHD CUCPMONGR [E SUFFERING E'RDLY DUE T^ THE CURP.ENT STRTE OF THE F_CONOMV. WE WEP.E TOLD THRT STUFF RUNS DOWN HILL. WHEN -fHE FEDS CUT, THE STPTES HU R'f, WHEN 'fHE STRTE CUTS, THE COUNTIES HURT, WHEN THE COUNiY CUTS, THE CITIES HURT, EUT THERE DOESN'T SEEM TO EE gNY'WHERE FOR VOU TG 30 WHEN THE OTTV FEELS THE F'I P1CH. WELL WOW IT I_OOY.S LIKE THE CITY HRS SOMEWHERE TO CUT, RND THRT SOMEWHERE SEEMS TO EE F'RGGRPMS THRT WILL DIRECTLY EFFEC"F OUR YOUTH. [T WRSN'T UNTIL RFTER OUR DISCUSSTONS OF "THESE ITEMS WERE CONCLUDED RPID THE PR RI'. 3 RECREPTiON COMMISSION HPD HRD iT'S VUF'I_IC HERRING ON THIS PRGF'GGRL THRT WE WERE RELE TG OETRIN A COPY OF= TI-IE RECRERTIOIV PORTION OF THE GRIFFI I'H STUDY. RFTER F.E iaUING SECTIOhI V OF THE S'iUDV, THE RECRERTfON DI'JIS?ON PORTION, WE WERE RELE TO SEE THRT THERE RRE MRJOR F'PIILUSOF~riI CRL DIFFERENCES EE,'WEEI THE STUDY RNU TI-{E RECD MhIE i'~IDPTION EEFOR F_ '/O U. WHILE THE STUDY DID PROVIDE VOIJ WITH R LUT OF GRRF'H9, CHARTS, RND MRTRIX E%gMPI_ES, THE ECOMCMIC RPID POLICY CONSIDERRTiONS ON F'PGE 46 PtJD THE RNRLVSIS RND RECOMMENDRTICNS ON F'RGES 47 THRU 49 DIFFERED DRR9TICRLLV FROM STRF F`S F'RESENTRTION. I WOULD LIKE TO RF_RD IT EME ONE RND TWO OF THE RNRLVSIS RND RECOMMEN DR7IUNS SECTION TO YOIJ RT THIS l'IME. Y*Y*1l•****M**iF*i'-/Y*Yif#*Y*#iil'**M***MX' 1F iF***Y***iF***4*i4*Y***MY Adult Activities - Typically, cities expect sport-related programs benefiting adult pzrticipants to recover nearly 100$ of their costs. This is not currently true for the softball program. Far example, these fees cover nearly all costs for registration, program administration, and a portion oP officiating costs. They do not, however, cover all of the operating expenses or any portion of the program's city-wide support costs, i. e. finance, purchasing, personnel, legal, etc. These are real costs to the General Fund, and therefore to the taxpayer who may receive no benefit from the activity. It has been DMG's experience that adult sports programs are areas where cities can be very aggressive in their fee charges to participants. This is true because adults are more likely to have the willingness and ability to pay for their entertainment. Therefore, based on these trends, we recommend that the City recover 100$ of total cost for adult sports and at least the direct labor and operating costs of all adult programs. Again, keep in mind that this is a process which could be done over a period of a few years making it less burdensome to current users of thFSe t~•pes of programs. Youth Activities - General fund support for youth programs is common- Experience shows that these programs are price sensitive, with increasing fees often leading to decreased participation (and therefore decreased total collections). Policy generally supports offering young people these types of structured activities, hopefully encouraging good citizenship. Higher fees might limit Dart is ipation by those children who would receive the most benefit. The City currently subsidizes l00$ of its youth events. Youth basketball is 77$ subsidized by general funds. Zt is Dt4G's experience that if these types of activities are provided, they must be heavily subsidized making these levels of subsidies not uncommon. However, small annual increases for youth programs generally do not tend to greatly affect total participation. It is therefore, DMG's recommendation that the City continue subsidizing youth programs, but that a small increase of up to 5$ per year be implemented. This will maintain the subsidy of youth activities at a high level, but provide some relief to the City's general fund without signif icantty affecting participation. ADULT RC71VITIES RS RODRESSED IN THIS STUDY INCLUDE "RDULT SOFTERLL". RCCORDING TO F'PGE IIIG OF THE F'ROF'OSRL, THE CITY DF RRNCH^ CUCPMONGR IS SUDSIDIZING THE 104 TERMS CURRENTLY INVOLVED IN THE RDULT GOFTERLL F'ROGRRM THE SUM OF 540,449.00. THIS COVERS PPSEHRLLS, UMPIRES, CITY EMPLOYEES TO RRKE RND CHRLK THE FIELbS, TROF'H IES, RND OTHER ITEMS RS LISTED ON F'RGE IIIT CF TI-fE F'RCF'OSRL. RDDITIONPLLV. WE HRVF_ DEEN SUBSIDIZING LIGHT USRGE RS LISTED ON F'RGE IIIU IN THE RMOUNT OF 'SdO, vlc. 32. THIS HRS RMOUNTED TO '560,361.32 FOR JUST ONE FROG RPM FDR JUST THIS VEPR. THE F'ROF'OSRL FOR COST RECOVERY IN THIS PRER WILL RLLOW FOR FULL RECOVERY OF ELECTRICRL USE, EUT WILL STILL LERVE US RESPONSIBLE FOR RN 519, 82 v. 00 SUBSIDY FOR NEXT YER R. ALL ^F THIS FOR R F'ROGRPM THPT RLLOWS FOP. 30% OF THE F'R RTICI F'PNTS T^ bE NON-RESIDENTS RND PCCORDTNG TD R LETTER I RECEIVED FROM MR. .70E SCHUL'R RS R RESULT OF DUR NOVEMBER 11, 1391 MEETING, ONLY 70X OF To-IE THE TERM5 NOW INVOLVED IN THE F'ROGRRM HRVE 70Y. OR MORE RESIDENT F'R RTICIF'RTION. THIS DOES NOT COME CLOSE TO THE RECOMMENDRTIONS OF THE STUDY. ON THE DTHER HAND, THE GTUDV RECOMp:ENDS R NERVILY SUPSIDIZED YOCITN SF'0RT5 PROGRRM, RND STRFF IS RECOMMENDING A COST RECOVERY F'RCF'bSRL THP.T WILL REQUIRE YOUTH SF'b RTS ORGRh1iZgTIONS TO GHCULDER RN RDDITiONRL BURDEN OF 550, c27. 22 FDR ELECTRICRL USE, RS WELL RS 'S 9, 645. n0 FOR FIELD PLLOCR7ION COSTS. THERE ^OESN'T SEEia TO E'E RPIV F'ROVISI0IN FOR R TIERED COST RECOVERY RS HRS SEEN RECOIMENDED DV THE GRIFITH STUDY, RND 14JOULD LII!E TO SCE RN RNNUPL REVUE PROCESS SPELLED ^UT SO RS TO DE RN RGENDR ITEM FOR THE 5F'O RTS RDVISORV COUNCIL TWD IgONTHS PRIOR TO '(HE CITY COUNCIL 'HEPRINGIN SUESERUENT VERBS. I REDUESTED A WRITTEN E%F'I_RNRTtON PROM STRFF CONCERNING THESE DISPRRTTiE5 IN FHILOSOPH`/ DURING R NOVEMBER Ii, 1391 MEETING, PUT HRVE HERRA NOTHING TO DRTE. i HRVE RLGO MET WITH COMMITTEE MEMEERS WHICH INCLUDED EOTH STRFF RND COUNCIL MEMEERS, HUT I DID NOT RECEIVE R DEFINITIVE PN5WER. I WOULD LINE TO REQUEST AT THIS TIME THRT COUNCIL ROSTPONE R FIPIRL DECISION ON THIS PROPO5RL RND SEND IT ERCK TO THE COMMISSION, THE COMMITTEE, qND STRFF FDR FURTHER REVUE SO THRT WE i~1RY E5TRPLISH R F'OLIC'/ WHICH hlO RE CLOSELY RESEMELES WHRT HRS PEEN RECOMMENDED BV THE GRIFFITH STUDY. :~ ~. ~ ~ November 11, 1991 Bob Olari 9637 Manzanita Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Bob: As request in writing at our meeting of o Currently the Adult Softball has 7o percent of the teams meeting the residency requirement as established in the Field Allocation Hanflbook. o The electrical fee for lights was added into the Cost Recovery Study by the Sub-Committee reviewing the Community Services portion of the Griffith Study. Community Services had defined lights as a staff consumption item since staff is used to turn on and off lights as well as coordinate use. It was determined that Recovery should also include electrical consumption and therefore staff met with Southern California Edison tb determine consumption figures and then included them into the Cost Recovery process. Cordially, i '-~ L~ _ ~SOe Schultz ,~tommunity Services Director JS:tp ~1 date: November gin, 1991 Tc~: Members of Rancho Gucamcm ga Ctty Coll roil Subject: I pst Per :,very F'r~~grdm Name: Santlte Oer1y Festtlent: :6 years; current address: 5652 Emerald Street Thant you fr,r the opportunity to address you cm what I cr,nsider a very serious new dire.t i~%n fnr our city. P'arn:hp fu[amonga has long held a reputation for offer inq a very high goal tty of life. A large part of that has been the avatlah tl ity of organized yoLrth sports activities. Promotional brc%c hur es, slide presentation s, etc. regularly im_lude shpts of ycn.rth partic spat icm. Rside from the positthe value cf enticing people tc. nur ]aim mLln lty. yc~gth Sports dYe a Very YBal fdCtOY in andlntdlninq OLIY high quill ity of life. You are all invol vetl in some degree with iaw enfor,: ement and do not need me t!% tell ynu the real sties ..f i tfe re~ardtng Iuventle deliquenty and suicide, ganq involver.,ent and drtlg abuse. It is a proven fact that there is a dtr?ct _cu rel anon between lac l: pf organized arttwities and in..reased 7uventle ..rime. I believe that it has been shown that f~~r e. erv 51.00 spent on provttling youth activities, 550-100.00 is spent on counsel tng "at risV'." youth, and 35, Un0-IG,400 is spent pr..r essrnq a child thru the juvenile court system. Lan the City of N.~rd the rts{: ..f saving d 3L 00 at the cost of 310. 5100, 31, GOO let a L,ne the Ipss c.f nur must precious commodity - a child? I recently hatl the opportunity of seeing i soccer teams, 1 e~f boys aged 16-SA and the other aged i4-Iv. They were from an AvS^ F'egton to inner city Los Rngel es - Pic~~/Nr~r Mandy area. rh? program was started with funding thru the 0l ymptc Organ i~tnq .ommtttee. Inprder to part i~_ipdt e, the players had to sign a -ontr a_t that they wca,ld attend schc~pl and maintain a C average. have no ganq involvement ..r abuse any drugs, attend all pram t~.e+ and games, and attend Church regularly. Any ejecticm from a game was automatic removal from the team. There were n~~ sp e~tatore allowed at games and they removed therr .jersey's before they Left the field. Ail this was done willingly and eagerly - that is h~,w t important the opportunity to play organized sports was tr. these disadvantaged young men. The success of this program has nc~t sat well with the lnc al ganq, so they have taken over the field where these teams pract i•-ed and have decreed that only ganq members nre now allowed. N~~vember 20, 15'1 F'ancho Cue amcmga Ctty Lounc Ll /Sand Le Oeriy F'age YeLith Lnvni vement to sports Ls not curly a deter ent to negat the/del tquent a=t tv tt ies, tt is a verv pos Lt ive tlevel c~pment tgoi, St ud Les have 5ha m a mart ed decl the Ln r,he physical and tt trm pf gmer U; ans. Early part tc ipat ton to or qan ized spurts can set a gr.ntl example for the need for Dhysic al act rutty. In atltl it LCm, Lt can he a means ..f tlevel opinq self esteem and =r_~nfiden•.e and under st antl Lnq the ~~al ue of peer Lnter act tun and .toper at ion. The Cost Pee Query Fr ogr am before year would mast def inateIy result Ln the loss of oppcmt~lntty to parttctpate fix same of the tlLSadvant aged youth in our comm~ntty. At2 of the youth spc•rts or genteel tons have been addressing the need for c~%ntatm nq costs inr several years, having direct tnovl edge of the tnc roes Lnp numCer of people having tv pr tort tze their spend inq, in.cr easLnq r egt~esCS f;!r schol arch ips and delayed payments. I Gel Leve all ar ol.~.ps have sot pr ov Lding that support as a high pr icr tty. We bel rove the C'Lty should da the same. I would trio to offer comments in regards to two part tcul ar areas of the pr r_~posal- FLrst, the Field F'ental port ton. As a ctt tzen wh :~ donates a ~;~=ins Lder able amount of time doLng adm AnL Sir at ive functions for youth in the community, I am tnsuit ed that 1 shr:uld have t.. pay for the -r rvilege of request LOa use of City iLe]ds. veu could asf.. me tq pay fc,r a 1wad of fort it i~er nr a bag of grass seed and I ::~uld understand, but this - m? 'uay. In addtt LOn. staff has indicated there would most lt6ely be a need for adtltt u:nai personnel time to overs?e the cc4lect ion of ths5e fees. Is this a case of taking 1 step fc~r uard and 1 L 2 steps bw;Ywargs wl th the real losers 6e1nq our youth" I tlo net Gel love that the L.~C al schc~nl dLStr tots and their r espeet LVe Hoartl c.t Trustees are aware of the prnprreey fee rel at inq to schr~ol pr nperty. Is Lt possible that they may at ect ~~r be regl.u red tc ~:har ge the C'.Lty for their admtn istr alive cost s~' lLgatn the poss16 L1 Lty of 1 sC ep for uard, number 6acF~war ds. i bel tvve there Ls a better way to adtlr ess this sLtuat ten. The I.lty 1'~•?~ rep; Erltly advert tsed the val Ue Of C1t 1Len vOl Unt eery at sLty Nall. Mr. "Perry ih~umas and I formally v.=.l unt eer to assume the tasl of pr aces ulg fLeld req~.lests to the extent staff wxtl .lll~?w thl.ls dr d3t tC ally redw; inq the rg5t t~~ the City. In regards to the Fteltl Lights portLOn, I w~?old ltl•e to correct s~rme mt suntler st and Lnq or lath cf l•noul etlge by F'ar 6s and F'ecreat LOn Department and fommissipn. Use of lighted fLeids can nn longer b? ~=ons Lder ed a truly opt tonal item. It has become an tncreasing necessity iqr many of talc adult vol unt eery and yr,uth party=ipant s. The fir 5t year itghts were available to the AYSO November 20, 1991 Rancho Cucamonga City Courn. it/Sandie Oerly F'a ge pr r~gram, the line to sign up started befcre 2: C:Opm for the 7:OOpm meeting. AYSO was forced t~~ qr. t~~ a lottery draw system f~~r practice site sel ect:gn. Each year the AYSO prggram lases :oath es and players because they are not able tg get to practices. This year, si ro_e our team did not get a lighted (field, both my s,:n's coaches have hatl to take off work, cond u~t practice, and then return to we.r b:, fortunately they have that fl e.,i6il ity. Since the time change, I travel an additional 5 miles [ days a week tc, picb~: up a player whose parents do not get home until after S: V~ip. This is definat ely a common situation. I would also like to remind/inform the council members that the first lightetl fields lBer yl Park East) came a6cat via requests from ~. it iz ens due tr, the negative client el that was frequently the area. The Ioc a1 citizens feared for their property and personal safety. There was very limited citizen use of the park after dark and there was regular/e?:pensive vandalism. Currently, there is e•ct ensive evening use of the park'. fail it ies, not just the fields. Citizens regularly take advantage of the Jogging lanes antl even the picnic and play facilities. I know of citizens who en.j cry an evening walk. to Eer yl Par V: lust to watch the tames for an hour or so. Ped Hill is alive with nom sports activity every night. R WIDE RRN~3E OF CITIZENS AP,E ENSOYING RND FENEFITINij FPOM THE LIliHTS. The proposal hefc~re you contains many iro=onsist ern_ies and inequities. It excludes Senior Citizens and the Equestrian tat it ides. I can understand the Senior Citizens - they have earned the right to en )~~y their golden years. EUT, HOW CRN VOU DENV THE SAME CONSIDERATION TO OUP, VOUTH...THEY ARE OUP, FUTUF.'E'% The proposal subsidizes the City Teen F'r ogram aver E86,000. EUT, WHAT AEOUT OUR HUNDF'EDS OF TEEfJS"' The proposal removes the Equestrian facility for further study. AT THE VERV LEAST, bIE DF_MAND THE SAME CONSIDERATION' a.ta a yr nnavvrav vv~navavavvn -^„ MEMORANDUM '~ :~ DATE: November 2G, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the Cit(y/~~~1 COU nc it FROM: Jan S:itton, Deputy City Clez(k lo,~. SUBJECT: COST RECOVERY FOA COMMUN ITY ~S/E1`RVICES PROGRAMS I received a call from Diane Hernandez, resident of the City, who wished to et ate that she and her husband Art were against paying extra for having their kids in youth sports. She felt with the recent ra iee in their taxes, that should be able to cover everything, and if the costa go up for eporta, they would not be able to participate. /m C1'I'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: November 20, 1991 To: Mayor and Members of the City C//ou ncil FAOM: Jan Sutton, Deputy City Cler :,y'~ S UHJECT: COST RECOVERY FOR COMMUNITY SE VZCES PROGRAHS I received a call from Mr. Stead, a resident of the community, who ie unable to attend the meeting tonight and wished to express his views regarding the above item. He was against the City charging for any activity that helps to keep kids off the street. He felt it was awful that the City could keep the lights on at the Civic Center from duck to dawn, but could not afford to give kids the use of lights Eor a couple of hours a night. He also felt the City was pigeon-holing all of its funds into so many eegme me (i.e., Aedeve lopment, Assessment Oiet ricte, Beautification Funds) that was why there was no money in the General Fund to support youth activit ie a. ,m ~' .`~~ ~ Ct~nthia Turner ~~°/~ ~i'i9 '~ ~~fy NaCC~ 1~ bu T am ou- t rased ~ -f'he ~ropCS~l c ~ ra~s'~t~ ~ -1--~ e cost ct ~ y y _'' ~ " a S 5 re 0.t d ea, ~ -t' p `f , ha.'f 1 5 F l~ o c.c_ ~Sf • . Df ~ °„X e +h ~rOQosa ~ 5or'~ ~ ~~re~ w~.~~ nod lie able ~ -f- Wou.lc~ tom' a.nd- ~'-h~lc~.ren n i a o - zed ~~o rfs , r9 ~- -~-he ~e i ~ w,~e~ 11 be f . ~,,~ G e ree A Kna~s ~,,~ ~ oa 1<<d5 n e ~p+ do n more cn des or i n Gans . , Sing re~~ cy,~~h;~ Tu,-~~ Y ~ ~ --CI'17 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM "• > - DATE: November 18, 1991 To: Mayor and Hembers of the City Council FROM: Jan Sutton, Deputy City Cle k SD RJECT: COST RECOVERY FEES FOA COMHDNI Y SERVICES PROGF_ S Earlene Miller, at AA-980-3 d92, a resident of the City end a parent of children in youth sports, called stating she would be unable to attend Wednesday's Council meeting but wanted to express her opinion on the above item. She felt that the City shoo ld not charge tees to the sports organizations for use of the fields and light e, because those costa would be passed on to the parents. She et eted that as a parent with three children in youth sports, she would not Da a63e to afford to keep them in sports if the costa go up. !m C~ C~ ~~~ ,, ~' .'` ~, `~9.~-=-- -- - _~11 q_ -- - . ??A~--~ ~. -t~~. clams-t- l~~!~- 59(,-Sq~- - I~CU'~t.Q~ TU,p ..- 11-x-91_ C1rS"r Rnuru,,,.Cf=~s'"--~"".'~avs. Pra~a,,. ~ ~ ~°..a.r,Y~. --_ .-, u "~~~ ~ -- ~ .~~ ~~~e.~ h~ F1d ~ t,ITY OF RAf;CHG CU;,%6.~~.:... { nr' ' NGV 1~~ 1~~~ ~'Od.t ~il.~ Ypf ,Qt~1111~1Y1~i„f r~ 1, ,,, l''^. ,,.~i c~'~ . art a ~ ~~ "'"` ~-~. ~ c~+ ,n 4~-1 ~,,,, ~,,,~,ti~ '~ ~ ~-~~,,,„Q ,~ 1 Cwt ~ew„w,,..+u- ,„ ~ aA.-e.. ~ ~ «~~~ ~ ~~,~~ ~ ~ti2 ~~" ' ~ -~,~ --~1t,1i~,cM ~~ ~1 r~•-~-`~ ~..~1h- ^-~~t_G ,,emu-~'-~'/' S~ "d~- r ~~ ~~ ~ !k:F1f,. nn ~ e,,, '~ ~ 1 ~~ N O V- 2 0- 9 1 W E ll 1 4[ 3 1 R g N C H 0 T E C H N O L O G Y P 0 2 ~. . ~ . : November 19, 1991 RANCHO CUCAMONOA CITY HALL 1 11500 Civic Curter Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA ~. 1 bave just been informed that the city council is recommending that the youth sports l~,gurs in tha city start paying for using the pazk facilities, I nee tht cost of youth sport more than dabbljng ' b:,^au~e of thla, 1-ha parks in this city have btxn and ere being paid for by those of us who live here. (t is tiiy sre,c5tion that the city find alternative means to help support these youth sport groups. A*m everyone can afford such an increase in youth sporU activities. Remember sport:. hetpa keep the kiAs off tho streets. Sipruely, f,...~ ~, Iol+n A. Fobel~ Viia President - ~- -^ -~. ....~ ~.. ~, .r n~.nann ~n o, vin mhon l.lor~ r its ~nn 9~9~tiR5 lMpORTANT MESSAGE .. +~ t.t`~CC-o.e -- vu.m+=ro a=E rnu __~,I eus!~ I I -i- ~ -~ ' R°C'!RN° JYO~ r CdLL 'i 6°E"IFL A^FliIJN _ ___ AR' ~_ ~,~ - ~._ _ ~lix yr ne+iv~n~ vu ut+iviuiv uri MEMORANDUM (~-~y s V DATE: November 20, 1991 TO: Nayor and Hembere of the City Council FROM: Jan Sutton, Deputy City Cler SUBJECT: COST RECOVERY FOR 6'OHMUNTTY SE ICES PROGRAM Deanna Montoya, a resident who ie unable to attend tonight's meeting, called to express her opinion on the above item. She felt the idea was absurd end absolutely opposes it. She has two children who have been in sports for fourteen ye are, and if the City has money for statues and palm trees on Naven Avenue, why are we penalizing the youth of the City. She dose not care where the money came from for these other items, she felt we needed to keep kids off the streets and hated to see them penalized. /m u•~~v CIiY O~RA~CHO aTCONU~.y td UV ': v 179 November 18, 1991 ~S19~p11ll,Y1'i~'~''A Dennis L. Stout Mayor Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Ranch Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mayor Stout: Why would a city want to charge money for AYSO, Little League, Pop Warner, and Pony-Colt to use the parks and schools we already support through our taxes? I am greatly concerned that the affects of over sQending and the hugh cost in maintaining Haven, is now affecting our children and the fun things we do as families who live and work in the city. What next; a entry fee into our city parks for those thaC can afford to pay and play. I have three small children who enj oY these very game fields you wish to charge us for. I am against it and feel that when a city over spends with projects such as Haven and the city entrances on Archibald and Haven; it is nat the children and the parents who should bail out the city due to past mistakes, but the blame is on you and the members of the city council. xtizen of t,Rnan~ch+o Cucamonga, Russell H. Warner I yr fcalvcnv uuuamvrvun MEMORANDUM ~'.~ +t' DATE: November 20, 1993 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jan Sutton, Deputy City Cle k SUBJECT: COST RECOVERY FOR COMMUNITY SE VICES PROGRAMS Hr. Hernandez, a resitlent who is unable to attend tonight's meeting, called to say he thought it was disgraceful io charge far youth programs. He felt the more programs there were for the youth, the better it would be for the City. /m US&R FEb COMPARISON. CHART CITY RC REPORT Montclair Not offered Norco Not offered Fomona Not offered Upland Cha rge is Applic Not Available INTERVIEW FINDINGS No charge No charge No charge No charge Diamond Bar •Rialto Chino $237/day incl. li ts Ontario ~ 1-2hrs $30 ~ /~ 2-4 hrs $20 >9 hrs $90 other: $7/hr fields $SS/hr stadium +$19/hr prep +$7/hr staff +3/hr base rental San Dimas Practices $5/hr or w/lights $11/hr (residents) Fontana $2/hr money boxes for lights Ne charge No charge $13; hr Electrical bill paid by local leagues (not charged an hourly rate) Charged for lights only $11.50/hr for softball fields $14/hr for larger fields $8.50/hr pre-season or practice games only. No charge for regular season games +Not inc'aded in Rancho C1u camnnga study FACT SHEET ON COST RECOVERY • The City of Rancho Cucamonga receives 4.5 cents of every property tax dollar compared to the statewide average of 19 cents per tax dollar. • The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a policy of assuming the organization or responsibility Por the nonprofit youth sport leagues. • The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not discussed using cost allocation fees to fund nonprofit youth sport activities, i.e., City of Rancho Cucamonga Little League (city sponsored.) • It is proposed to recover light costs on an hourly basis for all organizations that consume electricity for night- time activities. • The City will recover costs for city-sponsored activities.., just like we propose for nonprofit sport organizations. • The City will monitor league use of electricity and issue appropriate charges/credits for actual vee. • Energy credits will be given for non use or partial use of pre-programmed allocation of field light use. • The City Council authorized staff to enter into contract with Griffith on October 18, 1989 to generate a cost recovery report. • The recreation element was pulled from the Griffith study in April 1991. A city council subcommittee was formed to research the recreation element and its impact within the thirty-one (31) program area, • All elements of the Griffith study, except recreation, was approved and passed on April 11, 1991. • The City commissioned the Griffith study as part of the post proposition 13 mandate. Proposition 4 was passed by the voters, which requires that cities and counties to conduct business in the most cost-effective manner. Proposition 4 requires that all costs by government be "reasonably borne" by those who are receiving the direct service. The most logical method to determine if the costs of services being provided are reasonably borne by those receiving the services is to conduct user fee and cost allocation studies. To conform with the voters mandate, the City engaged David M. Griffith & Associates to conduct the study. FACT SREET COST RECOVERY Pa4e 2 • The Griffith study process can bast be described es a review of all costs associated with providing city services to determine if any adjustments were necessary. Total costa for each service were to include direct and indirect department costa. The next step was to match these services with any current revenue received Por those services to determine if a general Eund subsidy existed. From these two documents, Griffith provided the City with their professional opinion on direction and percentage of recovery the city could anticipate iP the cost recovery study ware adopted. JS/kla RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MEMORANDUM DATE: November 19, 1991 T0: r ident, Memhers of the Board and City Manager FROM: Hart, Administrative Se rvice5 Director SUBJECT: HIBIT FOR RESOLUTION FD 91-022 ITEM i9 ON THE VEND R 20 199 CONSENT CALENDAR } R=solution FO 91-022 references the amended pERS contract as an exhibit. Staff inadvertently omitted that exh iDit in transmitting the agenda information. Attached is a copy of the amended PERS contract which is incorporated as an exhibit to the resolution. Section 10 of the contract is the section relating to the change in the survivor benefits. Sorry about the oversight. JH/dah attachment AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADAl1NISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC ERIPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF T1iE RANCHO CUCAMONGA F[RE PROTECTION DISTRICT The Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to as Boazd, and the governing body of above public agency, hereinafter eeferred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contraM effective February I5, t975, and witnessed Febmary 12, 1975, and as amended effective lone 16, 1979 and May 26, 1990, which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Boazd and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: A. Pazagraphs t through t t aze hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective May 26, 1990, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1 through 12 inclusive: 1, All wocds and [erms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have Ne meaning as defined therein unless oNerwise specifically provided, "Normal retirement age" shall mean age 60 Cor focal miscellaneous members and age 50 for local safety member. 2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System from and after February t5, t975 making ics employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to aII provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply oNy on election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to alt amendments m said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting agency. 3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall became members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as ace excluded by law or this agreement: a. Local Fire Fighters (herein referred to as local safety members); b. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 4. fn addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by ' said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members of said Retirement System: a. POLICE OFF[CERS. t ~~ a This contract shall be a continuation of the benefits of the contracts of the Alto Loma Fire District and Ne Cucamonga Fire Protection District, each hereinafter referred m as "Former Agency", pursuant to Section 205b7.2 of the Goverrunent Code, Former Agency having ceased w exist and having been required by law to be succeeded by Public Agency on February I5, 1975. Puhlic Agency, by this wntract, assumes the accumulated contributions and assets derived therefrom and liability for prior and current service under Former Agency's contract with respect to the Former Agency's employees. Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1, 1988. 6. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21251.13 of said Retirement Law (296 at age 60 Full). The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each yeaz of credited prior and current service az a local safety member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21252.01 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 50 Full). Public Agency elected to be subject to the following optional provisions: Sections 21380.21387 (1959 Survivor Benefits) including Section 21382.4 (Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefiu). Section 20862.8 (Credit for Unused Sick Leave) for local safety members only. Section 20024.2 (One-Year Final Compensation) for local safety members only, 9. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and furore service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said Retirement System. 10. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System az follows: Public Agency shall contribute 52.50 per employee, per month on account of the liability for the 1939 Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21382.4 of said Retirement Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall De pools! in a single account, hazed on term insurance rates, for survivors of all local miscellaneous members and local safety members. b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contract to rover the costs of administering said System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. c. A reasonable amount, as fined by the Board, payable in one installment as the occazions arise, to cover the costs of special valuations on account of employees of Public Agency. and costs of the periodic investigation and valuations requireA by taw. I1. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees' Retirement Law, and on acwunt of the experience under the Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and valuation required 6y said Retirement Law. 12. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of the period m which said contributions refer or as msy be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or Iess than the correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in wnnection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the Board. B. This amendment shall be effective on the ,l9 BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM day of BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BY BY CHIEF, CONTRACT SERVICES DIVISION Presiding Officer PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Date Attest: Clerk PERS-CON-702 (AMENDMENT) (Rev. 3/91) `'73,. °~/6 i r~ = '~ ~, / ~-L~ G~~ ~~s~,a J °~l S[1, CAD - `175 o-tYu -,• ~- _- ,. .. /!2 . i. . ~.. f=.a.~.' J 1. S wv~ E r ,fit .:., j~ 1~. ~Sb' ho-u'.,~;~c2 ~~~~. ~C %:~ GJ%~/Z.J ,~ ~~C4,1 J ~ 's/C .'ray, 7~ ~ l L~ L L~.~ L<-w e~,~cktri, ~c~t, - AysG -- ;~--- 120,Gy6. ~o~` ~~~~~: l7a ~ `slam l3S ~C a/Da9 135,E 's85~ : 'l 3S02rD GZaeiQ t Cee a,4.,~ '/l 5d +.t. '7~j~ ~ CC ~J ~!~ 3 'J~ l l o. D-~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROC~RfaM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. V ~ r' tization f~<P ~t / tr n;~~,,~`1 w /c yz ion Job - N Hours Period Duration <Week/Manth) CN of Months) At the current rat• for similar positions paid by th• City, the value of mr service should be approximatelyt 33a s~ ~~ (. ~/~l 7s ,~ ~ /D `~ z ,C t ., - s/~. to i ty Positi n Salary x Time a oun In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies br used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name /5~~~~ ~~'/GC d'J70 /~ Address ~ 1~~'GI .S?9HAIr¢' fft~l Date ill/Y'/S/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. ati on Position Job - N Hours Period Duration (WeeK/Month) (N of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of mY service should be approximately: ~i.j~~.Scv- -u,c G ,,~ ~5 c. ac e.a ~~-z ~/~ ~.~ ,gyn.. ~ ~ ~ c% ,~ .~ ~ = ~ ~ / /.2. ty Position Glary x Time Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies De used to off sek the minimal support that 'he City gives to non-pr o4it youth sports organizations. Name 3 qq/.rEr~b"~d ~~7`~3/~ Address\l ~ L~IU ~~ /7~" Date ~// CITIZEN'S CdST RECOVERY PROGRfiM As a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga I work the following hours in support of our youth. C.Om m ~SwnBf YSo ~ ~~.~ ~5 wEr-,= g ~nization Position Job - M Hours Period Duration (Week/Month) CM of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid 6y th• City, the value of my service sh )ould be approximately: City Positi-bn 3alarr x Time Amount In lieu o4 direct reimbursement for the value of mY services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name 'moo F1^~ ~ M1rlN ~~/ Address 6a-7a \-\C-~~M~~ ~`~~ AGTq y~oMq) Date _ _I 1_-_l4_ -yi CITIZEN'S C03T RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 worK the following hours in support of our youth. r ~~,QQ ~ ~,P~1 ~ nnr Jr~a~CY' '" zation Position Job - ']C~ rr~"S ~ - ~~~ Period Duration <week/Month) <p of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should 6e approximat¢Iy: .~ C 51 ~' ~ City Position Salary x Time = Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement 4or the value of my services, 1 direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name V.a rw"~cn >~\TT~~,f`~~, \ ~~,-, Address ~~~~ ` ~..r.~N-~ ~-i^ ` `"^ Date ~ ~ ~~' CITIZEN'S COST RECdVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in supDOrt Of OUr YOVth. zation Position Job - M Hours Period Duration (Week/MOnth) <N o4 Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the Value of mr service should be approximately: _ _ i.. n // / "14 / Ga on Salary x In lieu of direct reimbur semenL for the value o4 my sarvices, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sD orts organizations. Name /yore e'.1 D.u1P 5 _ Atldress A~j~ s°»+P•"sP~ Qom. Date ~~- ~~y ~ CITIZEN' S COST REC6~lERY PROGFYFSM ,/r ~: ~N I.fLi~`.4~~ As a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in suppark of our youth. ~AnJ 4+6.. `P v7^vnMAOtC~ou z anon sition Job - N Hours Period U Duran on (Week/Mon th> <>1 of Months> At the current rate for similar positions paitl by the City, the value of my service should be approximatetr: City Position Salary x Time = Amount In Lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of mr services, i direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the Cftr glues to non-profit you to sports organizations. a ~.,ls~u,l~ ~ a~Q. a~,y a s~ ~T,~ y--rI~~- ~4~.Q1' Name ~,( ^~ B1nLU ~"~AL~' +~h. Address ~ ~~ s':w. ~ ~(~7~1 ~y~o Date ~~, ~~\_ ~1~_ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. AySo ago.. l.S 'Boo.dl ~w..v~linc~ 1O \~,u~w`+. ~Wwh~~ Organization Position Job - N Hours Period Duration CWeeK/Mon th) C11 of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: L~i~Ett~-r.~ (E frL as y9 ~ = ia. ys l~,i/ .~~ZI ,fir-e Y Position Salary x Time In lieu of direct reimbursement 4or the value of my services, I direct that these monies 6e used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-pro4it you 4h sports organizations. Name `1.w.Q.U\' Address L~133 Jo. aw..~a pow Le..... Date \~14~1 t't~ H UC~GfA w~..w~ber .'~ awl ~h G4•o r~Y 0` Or~r~nS pn~ I SSui~n `J al \\ v.v~~~'o~r1y ~ ~o.\\s 3-~ I'1`~ -t"Qa~ 5 ark Doer` a~io0 ~C..~dS , CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga, 1 work the Following hours in support of our youth. ~n ~~e.n 1oS ~6P.OOWU+whor '~l.\AM~'s"'~ti ~ Vh6,y+,S ~ o70J Or anizati on Position Job - K Hours Period Duration <WeeK/MOnth) (N of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the Citr, the value of my service should be approximately: City Position Salary x Tima = in lieu o4 direct reimbursement for the value of mY services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit rou th aporls organizations. Name ~abi'~-\, Q~ 5~ Address lQ'133 `\c~.c~.e~~- Date \1 to :ll '0 _`~ ,.a (` .f~ 5 ~ ~(~op,.YVl VY~1LMlD~4 C- ZQvY~ lv~ C.MCt~~ `O Q1~ ~L.~ ~A.VI ,Tef °tl7 ~.(~a\\~ <oC ~/I~ ~,a.+1.7 QWS OVQ'- a':'ID° ~L~dS CIT22EN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our Youth. t~ ~ ~y 5 ~ ~ti~~. ~~~~ ~ganization Position Job - J i 9~ ~t iso Period Duratibn (WeeK/MOnth) <N of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my Service should be approximatelys y Position Salary x Time i in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of mY services, I direct that these monies be used to off Set the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name t i-Q ~" )^a~rnzv / S u C /"~ u r n n e ~T,~_. Address X03.4 ~1n fir. C, ~~Ave~ .~ 1 ttt / 1. ~, m.a~ C',~. .j I'7O Date ~~ ~i`l(9/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support 04 our youth. =~~ f-. ~ / = tfdZl i zation Position Job - M Hours Period Duration (WeeK/Month) (M o4 Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, th• value of my service shout d~ be `approximately: C~ Position Salary x Time Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement 4or the value o4 my se rvices~ 1 direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~-~~_ h, . ~,~~ ~~-~ Address J ~2 uy ~~I «.-~ .~P C~~~ rl yi ~_, a ~~ Date ~. ,.. _. ~.. ~ r CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. ~~~ ization Position Job - N HouFs Period. Duration (Wee ontN (M of Months> A! the current rate 4or similar positions paid by the City, the valur of my service should br approximatetyt ~sff9~= ~~ ySlw ~/~~ ~~ ~~97(c City Position Salary x Time Amount to lieu of direct reimbur semen! for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be uaed to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~~~A,.~~R h-vGS,.~-c e Address 77id r~"~c ~- ,F7/c/~4..~b.•1~ may. cjj7-~~ Date //. ~~l- 9/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAt-1 As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. /t ! `1 - SX ^I~`JQ rc un ml}IC.1Qr ~y A.r ~~. Wt<~ ~~ MrR1/1 f~ "S~Q Organization Position Job - if Hours Period Duration CWeeK/MOnth> tN o4 Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximatrlys ~s s~ ~ = is ys ~ 5G G ~~ fir; 9 ~~ City Position Salary x Time = Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name '$rZ~{- F~h4~[r Address k..rQL AWa~ [C ~.~ Date //-/°J-9/ CITIZEN^S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support 04 our youth. ;o ~ 3s-~la 111~.n~l,Z, 9-~O zati on Position Job - M Hours Period Duration CWeeK/Mon th) Ctl of Months> At the current rate 4or similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: ~s ~ ~ x = ~,~ vs ~'G l Icy..,. ~yy 1y ~_ City Position Salary x Time = Amount ;n lieu o4 direct reimbursement 4or the value o4 my services, I direct that these monies be used to o4f set the minimal support that the City gives to non-pro;it you to sports organizations. Name ~+`~' V "~• ' Atldre ss 7e~Z r~L,~IA fYQ~_~. Date ~_ +~,;. lu~f4k~ CITIZEN'S CCYST RECOVERY FROGRFaM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. ~'*nrJ. C-~q„)Us "//!ea ~ aura / ~/ .^ F~iBOG-'/CCl~ 7 N,LS/tee. ~o /HONE' / SU ` GSl~G(.~ /Y/C2rn.Utr 9 k C~itcfi°{LZ~OT/JM ~ /~ it anizati on Position Job - p Hours Period 6yTration (WeeK/Month) <N o4 Months) y= ~-~ At the current rate for similar positions paid 6y the City, the value of my service should be approximately: .;?kd'' ~'1-~ '~~28/'Gl ,= q '~' 1 ~'G'C /-c'd!ltf~ Pr55 3~=- ~ ~ ~S n)o ~`~21'C City Position SaTlary x Time - Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal suppcrt that the City gives to _n~pro4it yo~~ tsiz tip pin ~ R~ ~_~ Name / ~~-'~rC K. V ~~t2'Y<'S Address %37f.°, .[',q. ~COn'^J ''Q<y'Q ~°"'+~ p31,e ~~ ~~4 /~! CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRFaM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, i worK the fot lowi nq hours in support of our youth. /F~//<I [ L ~L'Af J G' [ G .C ~.r u.~ iNJ /~vC Y...K ~~' ce f ` fJ/- ,~! JFi1///.i i1<c%n.-.c, ' / ~ ~~ ~•ro ..7f~1 Organi zati Posi Zion Job - N Nours Period Duration CWeek/Mon th> (il of Months) i, ~, ~~ ,.;,,: ~ - _ ; vy:, At the current rate for si milar positi ons paid by the City, the value of my service should 6e approximately: '' ~?' _ i ~ ~ ~' 'c City Position Salary x ~`~i /7r~ i /. i ~ ~_ i = Amoun in lieu of direct reimbursement for khe value of my services, t direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~ r'L' /,>./L ~ ~ ~ ,CC.. .C. ~` C-.c./ Atldress / G' ~~ ~ C ~~iC~/Gr/C.Lf J //rcc /7~1. Oate CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga: I work the following hours in support of our youth. ,1 lC / ~fe~T1fU' b.J WG21L \ ~i. ~'il:s M~N1NS I~~~/. J ``~~ 6w.~.,r - 4.0 w.t¢ K / ~.: y r.o,v* d t L,7 S O hfCRO Co ACtF ~n c'S t7.wf - I•S MoNR~F I s ,( b Mc~~S y Organization position Job - M Hours Period Duration <Week/Month) CN of Mon t~ /%~ At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, my service should be approximately: 1 .~~. ity Pc ~. the value of ~~~3G on Salary x Time a,o In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services: I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~ ~ ~ e^`--~- Address 59 E9 "TCoTf2~u Let, Date ~I~iN' CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worN the following hours in support of our youth. ~~~ 2 Z4r S^'y'Ir~ 1 /~~/ / r~[.w/ // /l~ `%•~C~.. nGS~ t~l~~ ~.r'fo `~'~~.Y Cr,).C~rL 6 ~,r.~rf, Organization Position Job - M Hours Period Duration <WeeK/Mon the (8 of Months) a~/. _~=-- ~_... _.. 'i -. At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of mr servile should be approximately: / City Posi ton Salary x Time = Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement 4or the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to n~oJn-profit youth sports organizations. Name Dil~ ~~~1U 77c Address ~~~~ ~y~w~~ ~y2 ~~q- Cnw~ Date // ~/~/~S/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga I worN the following hours in support of our youth. ,/ I tY ~I,X`Yry`/ pp etc / ~~>< /J $O Cbf7Gl~~d r Z~ L(waa-IC- Ti /l?d~~ Organization YO51[IOn JOD - A Hours rer~oa Duran on (Week/Mon th) Cq of Mon th s> y~z At the current rate for similar posi loons paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: on Salary x Time = in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. /'~ ~ )a ~ ~ 33 q- 7~ Name /-.~flv/,Q ~/SKO/O Address 8289 flLy-/I Lo~rg /,~ Date ~/- ~ ~/- 9/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cuc amonga~ I worN the following hours in support of our youth. o coiacl~ iwo te~hs y8hr~~~,~~~t ~~.i zati on Position Job - N Hours Period Duration (WeeK/Manth//) (M of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of mr service should be approximately: on ary x me = Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies 6e used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name q~ O lhh /Y A L.A G(6 S n Address /3/~ l' Ii /W h ~ IC ~G . Date ~+ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRC.M As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. A S~ S U t=o 4 cl7 I Z. K ~ - / ~~. Organization Position Job - li Hours Period Duration (Week/Mon th) Cp of Mon th s> I tia~~ k..o 7.0.....s ~6 ~ c6 At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: Y Position Salary x Time = in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~ ~~d MCRF,~ Address "77 9y ~g,.~$,c0 Date /2 - /y - 9/ CITIZEN'S GOST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the 4ollawing hours in support of our youth. ~( (Q aN,A ~( a'~ aai 1A~ ~~/m~W 6 {~ U~ ~~r~ ID a}.~.w/m+eww ~, v~.ewti.e f7 ~.,! (: I)A 1.N :'"""'G"w~' a,0 (n"`:G'',+sr:#+ L .wu~v Organization Position Job - 8 Hours Period bur ation <WeeK/Month> CM o4 Months) 3 h ~ k,,,) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: f~ . ~I-~ '.. ~~ -F,~i ' ~.,C a,1 Lr / p~ City Position Salary x 35~~ Time = Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement 4or the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name Mau-~FaE~ 5 ~n~J~.~I~I~k~.ln~~(11~II~~(=Q Address "Iq~~, I-1L~J'~v~ ,/~1VG Date I°~V. ~ l r ~ '7 ~~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamon qa, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. ~~0~ ~~ ~°~ ~~~~ ~~~i,~ zation Position Job - N Hours Period (Week/Month) ~„a~ ffs ,_ wrat~wo___ .- tN of Months>~~-'~~ At the current rate for similar positions paid by 4he City, the value of mr service should be app/rox iymatelyi (LJ~ `~~G2 City Position glary' x Time ~ Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of mY services, I direct That these monies be used to offset tA• minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name 'nQ ~~ ~ /`~ L1 U <O~//%Y.~ Address J~07s1~ CA/~ Z~ Q. /t'~~G Date ~~7//~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga I worK the following hours in,support of our youth. 7~,rt f Z ABC so Crav~L, q'rL - wig ~ ~~ his y~~_-. ~,~~, ~ Organization Position Job - M Hours Period Duration CWeeK/MOnth) CM of Months> At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: -~ {~~ /a ~ ~e ~ ~f t,c, ~c6~.,L 4.p J City Position atary x Time Amount [n lieu of direct reimbursement for the value o4 mY services, I direct that these monies be used to of 4set the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. r Name ~"/EfYJr ~GO~ea'~ Address 1S1"f SdL14NJ Date /~~~c1~ CITI2 EN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support 04 our youtA. Q ~~' ? ?csns COOI.~If ~ zation Position Job - ~ wK = ~~~~ ,~d Y y -~ -,% y~;. iu rs Period Duration CWeeK/MOnth) <M of Mon ths> At the current rake for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should 6e approximately City Position Salary x Time Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, 1 direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support tha! the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name (~Le 7T r ~~ ,/ Address Date //-~~_ ~/ d~ 3Y CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM ,/~ /, As a citizen of Rancho Cucamongas I work the following hours in support of our youth. ~~J~ ~i~~ ~~-ti ~r~~~f ~f~,~/,moo ~~~~!- Organization Position Job - M Nours Period Duration ~/ CWeek/MOn thJ (8 of Months !-,-f,, At the current rate for similar positions paid by the CitY~ the value of my service should be a/pproximatelye G i ~ 9r .~ .~'. Citr Position Salary x Time = Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services T direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~~~ it /~/~l/J,/~// /J ~ Address /~ % ~l^~~~ / c~ 2 ~-c~ Date ~~ / / CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PRDORAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. d ~.,D ~a/1 /oG~~ io urmf'f ~~~~~ zation Position Job - N Hours Period Duration (WeeK/Month) <N of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the Cityr the value of mY service should be approximatelYs ~~ i~ t I _t~.c, _~',c,~c~ ~~d~ ~~rv /L,/~ ,~7w ~~/~~ k~ >~ `~/~~0 City Position Sat°ary x Time = Amount In Iieu of direct reimbursement for thr val u• of my services, I direct that these monies 6e used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Mama ~// ~~1i/~ Address .3h02 ~bf~-'.P rT ~L Date //- i~>- 5/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. P~~f,<~ } w-~~,~ / ~,ta ~1tc f. M~3 Org nization Position Job - M Hours Period Duration CWeeK/Month) CN of Mon th s> At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the uaiue of my service should be approximately: ~~ 7., c~,~ is{;/~a4~i lG~i~.m~.~~ ~~/~~~.~., /9„z />~ ~I~I~U City Posit on Salary x Time Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement {or the value of my seruices~ i direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the Clty glues to non-profit youth sports organizations. f ,/~ Name ~ n1~,cl iilS/A~1~c.L Address ~ ~ Dc c~ I ~ ~°^~, i^.n Date ~.~~~~ ~5 ~~~{~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. Org nization Position Job N Hours Period Duration CWeeK/Month) (N of Months) ~. Sf '! , ,uv 1. w~ m, x ~ = /.SW l~.rs 6+~L'G'-, At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service shou,/l d br approximately: ,. ~~-.... ~a;, Lei /~7_ /a :, ~////) y Posi tidn Salary x Time In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name Ty/.~~K/~ Address 513n ~/t~uN... Date ~~/Y-9/ C I T I Z EN' S COST RECOVERY PROCi RF1M As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. 1Yac~~ca ~}~ w1L A t,Cn ~l`..nr)n Oryaniza ion Position Job - M Hours Period Duration CWeeK/Month> CN of Months> i At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximatrly: City Position Sa ary x Time = In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be usrtl to oif set the mi nlmal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~\w.Q.S~ pp Address l0"73^~ ~,nQo.~P ~lkv~lev..t Date ~tl~`llh~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. PF=SCTKI= 3.e WLEk ~:X JC rm ~~i{.t' (002. ~., Hr.vo G,v.n c_ ze wr<r = Y" ~ v.no-~ '.32 -/ = AYJ'0 cnivch .,,. 5 / , .m~~ /•S ~C ~ ,+5 ~ ~% -1(L ^ :. Organization Position Job - M Hours Period Duration CWeek/Month) CM of hs) - ,/_ ~_, _ _ /G3 At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value o4 my service should be app~r/oximately: i~~„~,,~~ l~/a ~~ /~.3 ,1,~ ~~/,; 30 City Positi n Salary x Time = Amount In Iieu of direct reimbursement for the value o4 my services, I direct that these monies 6e usrd to offset the minimal support that the City glues to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name Geer , n .~ Address /L V3o Cn/i~.., /r..,o i..n.~ Date CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamon gay I worK the following hears in support of our youth. o Cn~l ~ stir~ET~ys ~,: ~o ~t~ = i > ~ tion Position Job - M Hours Period CWeeK/MontA) If701/~I S'L 7=iLe y M av~ i s = X3.2 b Iaoafb s - 7 ,~ __ Duration /~~ (N of Mon thyX/~~ At th• current rate for similar positions paitl by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: /,! /~ ono ~/L% ~. City Posi do Salary x Time a ,~. in lieu o4 direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. 5/tic lEem i~lik~ ~~2 c,s,~ Name 0 Addre ssz 1 ~~ ~~ Date _.!'-' I_ I_ C I'T22EN'3 GDST RECOVERY PROORRM As a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga, i worK the following hours in support of our Youth. S o ~~~ ~ .~ ~~ S ization Position Job - M Hours Period Duration (Week/MOn th) ip of Months) Rt the current rate for similar positions paid by the CitYr the valve of my service should be approximately; 7T r~ ; ~e~/.1. , /~H'a5~s ity Position Salary x In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my serviCesr I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non ^profit youth sports organizations. Name ~ // /t 1~14r~dCQ/~~ Address ~77Y .p 1!~ LS ~c~'i:/~' Date !~ ~~'~ll CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. on Position Job - N Hours Period Duration <Week/MOntN ftl of Mon ths> At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approzimatety: ii: C.; ,~n; ~.~10 w1~' ~L L~ ~l~d ~~~~`L City Position 'Salary x Time Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit tooth sports organizations. Name ~y d-/~ n /AZ~JIJ E Z Address ~ ~~ m9N b n KiN ~~~ Date //- ~~ CITIZEN'S COST REC OI.`ERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga I worK the following hours in support of our youth. /~ O zation on JOD - R Hours rerioa uura n on CWeek/Month) CN of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: i /l ~ lee , ~.t ..t I. ~[.~.//i~, City Position $al ary x Timr = A In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that. the City gives to non-profit youth sD or is organizations. Name ~ IrlQ t Q /'~ IV G~LVG ~ D Address ~ ~ J 3 RI M6N~ SI /~l/ Date ~'~~~~ t~ CITIZEN'S COST FYECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 work the following hours in support 04 our youth, A ~ L7 ERDGOAGH S"IO WE F1L 3'zI Moh7jj ganizati on Position Job - M Hours (WeeKlMonth) bt pr o4'Monthsi At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximatelY~ _. c i <• i ~_ ~~. ~ $, i ~ ~~~~~ ,~i~ lxlol~ City Position Salary x Time ~ Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value o4 mY services, I direct that these monies be used to o#f set the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit Youth sports organizations. Name ri czT 1 ~'r71J-/L-~ r c r-~ - Address $L^2 r~9o Jc ~ Date cc~S~9/ - CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga, 1 worN the following hours in suppor4 of our youth. ~,e+~nc~ -.~ ~ N~ ~E -ate ~s'1aisJ .vloa>ir/~<~ 1. C r~/~ /,~ ~ 5~~s co G1~~ ~~ ~! irta/?Ns-=3~% on Position Job - tl Hours Period Duration /,~~f~;~,~ <WeeK/Month) CM of Months At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of mr service should be approximately: ;~ { ~y y i ;~ ~5;~>u~ l ~io,c~~~ /~/ ~~ .~~o~o City Position glary x Time = Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direck that these monies be usetl to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-pro4it youth sports organizations. Name ~~6rroL,.y 6 ~ II~LTI/1~/~~~/~ p Adtlress 7[Ab 2/ /Yl'~ ~ ~~h ~{.G'~~j~/~ ~/V. 9~7,~ Date ~~~~i _~/ CITI2 EN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, t worK the following hours in support of our youth. Organization Position Job - N Hours Period Duration CWeek/Month>g CM of Months) ,i ~; ~- ,y At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, mr service should be approximalely: ~7 ,x: t . ~`,c,t~.~ ~.Z::~..~ ~~ /5 ~n c ~ ~'// % ~ ~£,~ on Salary x ~~~ ~6.~/ Time = the value o4 In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~1 E1riF K~~~ ~ Address gaa,cL.{i!,(7L>GA~ t~RM ICl> . AI..T~lb t,.6 WNe oats Il~l~gl CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRFrM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, i worK the following hours in support of our youth. - 3.O ~,r..eu~ s on Position Job - N Hours /"Period Duration ~ CWeeK/Mon th) CN of Months>~L%~ At the current rate for similar positions paid by the CitY~ th• value of my service should be approximately: ~, 1~,~ °~/ ~' %t'%J J1Lc ~~~~/: ~l ~~~ ~~ City Position Salary x Time = Amount in Lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal su pp ork that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ,~j I/ ,~ ^~ Address .107/~~avT~V3.!/~ NA'~ ~• Data ~///`~/4 CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRFrM As a citizen of Rancho Cuc amongay I worK the following hours in'support of our youth. ^~ EMD IRAet'ie s' N / ~ ~P TOU~aj / wK ~ ~.,2~ ~ G At~.rjLs n Ayso Si~cr it. CoAcN GsW ail - Z /lara3/wK ~~ // ~T (I .ww{LS Organization Position Job - M Hours Period Duration (Wee KyTlonth) (M of Mon ths> ~~ At the curren4 rate fior similar positions paid by the Cit y, the value of my service should be approximately: ~ l~~iti y., ~i~ ,c<~ ~~ I 2 he _ ~1~~~ City Position Salary x Ti me = Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of mY services, 1 direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that Lhe City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~ i FF J e Nas 9e.L Address Y}I3 Q~A.cTrr'd.No.Ete At•A Co.yA Date //- ~~/-9 / CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Lucamonga~ I worK the fallowing hours in support Of our youth. r%y ~ ~ inrYy' `IGI.IQtb on Position Job - K Hours Period ~ Duration CWeeK/Month> C8 of Mon ths> At the current rate for similar positions paid by the Ciky~ the value of my service should be approximatelyi City Position alarY x Time : Amount Tn lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies br used to offset the minimal support that the Citr gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~ ~/,, !.~/ P i Y"l_Q~ -`t/~n~.(~/~1,~ Address ~ Y2.!-L~JC~.-~-~j- Date ~~~~~ CITIZEN'S COST REGOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancbo Cucamanga~ I worK the following hours in support of our youth. {~ y5v ~ i~ t !~ ----- ~s .vim - - 3~, mtr~fss ganization Position Job - M Hours Period "- ~ - Duration ~~~, (Week/M nth) CN of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approxi/)malely: ity Position S lary x Time `Y In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies br uaed to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sp or to organizations. Name F~ ~iCC m. WC~~ Address /QJ37 ~i~N~LE7.UOG/~ Date ///~N/~/ CITIZEN'S COST R.ECdI.'ERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, i work the following hours in support of our Youth. f~ //~~ / ,~J, on Job - X ours d Duration /y ~, (Wee onth> (A of Months) ^-y._ At the current rate for similar positions paid by the Ci tY~ the value of my service should be approx imatrly: -,~ / q {~ i 'i'~' t,~c ~"~~xcELr 6C ~6b ., ,,-, ~ <' _ ~4/r%l'~ "~ ~~ /~-~_~ ~,;~, , , ~? /~.~ ti's City Position S Lary x 'Time = Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value df my services I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name /J-/~/ ~/fin/ESP./~-- ~j__ _ _ Date ''~ /~g! GITI2EN'5 COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. q~.5v Concµ 6 wEE~L'~'y { ~ 9~.~=- Organization Position Job - M Hours Period Duration CWeek/MOnth) <M of Months) At the current rat• for similar positions paid by th• City, th• value of mY service shou~l/d be approximately: / j ~. City Position al ary x Time Amount to lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives !o non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~Anl~ . I J iC. kir ~Sor~ Address S2.6Z ; C /CLl /~ p /~ /-~fr_ lt~ `7 ~~~~ Date ~i ~l y ~ 9~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRP.M Rs a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga I worK the following hours in support of our youth. on Position Job - M Hours Period Duration CWeeK/Month) CM o4 Months> At the current rate for similar positions Daid by the City, the value of my service shou,/ld be approximately y Position Salary x Time a [n lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~a~~ ~/~~~ tH Address 7~ 7 3 /~//d. .t<<+ Date CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cuc amonga~ I worN the following hours in support of our youth. Organizati on Position Job - N Nours d twee /Montn> At the current rat• for similar positions paid by the Ci my servics should b. approximatelys Duration CN of Months) x!- =.iuru..~c. ty, th• val w of 028 ~ so2~~O u_ i~._,., ~ _ s~ Position Salary x Time ~ In Iieu of direct reimbursement for khe value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~ofl'J~, L//P(//I/1~~-~/ Address IG.,?S ~ CU.PA~G~oD~ l'r, Date //~- //>~/>~/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRfiNI As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worN the following hours in support of our youth. HYJO Loath 5 kl~1c==~cF,~s,>>sy ~= ~'h'~ Dr ganization Position Job - M Hours Period Duration CWeeK/Mon th> (K of Months>~ , At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, th• value of my service should be approximalely~ ~~ City Position Salary x Time = Amount In lieu of direc4 reimbursement for the value o; my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name I Address C J V 1 ~mQ Dace 11 - 1'y'_q~ CITI2EfJ'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. zation Position Job - M Hours Period - Duration (WeeK/Month> (R of Months) 5,c ~/ x .5 At the cui•ren4 rate for similar positions paid by th• City, the value of mr service should be approximately ty Position Salary x Time s in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name c -iGriZ.~.e-~ ~6sril/l/ Address G ~ ~~ .~/~, 9j 7(l/ Date ~i~~/'fti/% ~7>~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worth the following hours in support of our youth. Organization Position Job - k~Hours Period Duration CWeeN/Month) (N o4 Months) 3><y><!~= 7~ At the current ra L for similar p ~~`5 C ~ ~ 9 positions aid by the itye of my service should be approximaNlys /~ /~ y Position Salary x Time = In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my seruices~ 1 direct that these monies be used to offset thv minimal support that the City glues to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name /~ Address 78 2- (,I Date ~ j`I ~7 Z/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. 3~ ~x~ cy '~ SC~r - ~a / i on Position Job ll Hours Perio Duration (Wee /MOn lh) (M of Monih s) °~G ,r 3 ~ ~ 111 At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximatelyi '9, on Salary x Time In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct lAat these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~/!/,,J2q o,~~.Jsc./ Address `77~ ~~c,(/NEC /~ Y~cJ /~ ~.4 ~A ~f ~73~ Date _ //- ~~ _ f~ G~~? EN ~ 5 cTTZ2 PROGRAM ftECO~•gR`` s 1~ suPP°rt hour t aorK the {oii~in9 Cuc ~,ooya, our Yo th o4 ka^~ho ~,~ ~ e~~ peri°d o~ch1 5w N urs (WeeKM/ ~ [~ 5f I w5 y'~ purati~o~ths) C~Mn o4 bV on bS Positi 9snitat,oo id by the C~tY+ nt rates aPP~O%11m~te Y° t, oos Pa At the V,, cer should b I"Av~ ~ mY ser Time Value o4 the x 1 dir tyt osition Sa~arY o4 mY a~<,tha ~ the " C i tY P the V a oU ma\ sapP of .d,re es oe uout ~ vo t5sOf9° a Zations. So lieu ese moo root Y that t to no^~P 9iVes ~r Name Address ~~~.91 l~' Date CITIZEN'S COST REC Ot.'E RY PROGRC~M As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, t worK the following hours in support of our youth. ~twch .cC . a.o l~.l 3 t,.os G o-..,a - 1~.. ~lCw` 1,~ti t,.F•,. Organization Position Job - N Houlrs Period Duration SWeeK/Month> CM of Months> ~ ~~ ,~a. 5 i~~ r, s>< ~. s At tha current rat• for similar positions paid by the City, ~ ~;lue of my service should be approximately: ld On Salary x Tim! m In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I Oirect that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ry"t`1 Address ~ Date ~,.` \`~ \~4 t CITIZEN'S C05T REC OIJERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. ~ ~ ~~ ~ o /.~Q o-d C.O)ic LT G FFf-l L.~ •et.L ~ ft d/ ~tion Position Job - N Hours Period Duration (Week/Month) cM of Months) At the Curren! rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: y Position Sal arY x Time m to lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal Support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ry,~Ni~ OSS' tJ:. i Address 91'38 ~3u¢fY4.,is:y /~c->t ~.or~.L Date ~J' CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PR06RAM A5 a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, i worK the following hours in support of our youth. u ~,! - 9G ~$U Ca.acH G Nres /lJK Y Mos. zation Position Job - M Nours Period Duration fWeeKlMonth) <R of Months) At the current rate 4or similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: on Salary x ~~ ~~~~ ~ 'f me Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement 4or the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth spor to organizations. Name ~OlMJ /~[cK~R/~/G- Address ~$3 G ~`9/Hvzra,v. n1 J~4 Date ~~~Y~J/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. zation Position Job - N Hours Period Duration CWeeK/MOnth) CN oS Mo /~/sT/~ S~ 7 At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: City Position Salary x Time = In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services i direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~1.L-~ ~hti?~Lbs> Address lol~i -~10LLN ,~i'• L•G Date I~-~+F-91 CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho CucSmonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. A ~tihJ /T l/5~ COACM I~2+c rice .Z•S warK Y / >( GNneS ?•U wdd~c ~/G/ ~( t~.-+~.i rfS ,z 1'i ••r0.17'N$ yO °~~ Organization Position Job - N Hours Period Duration CWeek/MOn th> tN of M ~ lG GI At the current rate 4or similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: City Position Salahy x lime = in lieu of direct reimbursement 4or the value of my services, I direct that these monies ba used to o4f set the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~r/+-w~fM. C l~ Address 77N0 LacvititveA~ ~r /z.1.JCNJ G~or.•...,.~.t Date iii /~9/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRFiM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the fallowing hours in support of our youth. ~33'~~~ ~{~ -1~~hJ hrrn~s /.o.~c wv /,~~1 >~ /~wG_S = /y zati on Position Job - M Hours Period Duration cWeek/MOnth> ctt of Month s)„~ At the current rate for similar positions paid by the Citr~ the value oY my service should be approximately: y Position Salary x Time = Amoun in lieu of direct reimbursement for khe value of my services, I direck that khe se monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name Address ~~.3~7 l~liLEil~_p ~~/~ Date ~~~~G/- CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM ~i„/i~c-NI As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. zati on Position Job - M Hours Period Q Duration (WeeK/Mortth) tM of Months> At the current rat• for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: City Position Salary x Time - Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name Q~~~f ~ / f ~F~[1MiA~/~ i7 I ~G Address ~ ~,~a7~ (:Miy.9C ~AI.L ~~i-G~.e.~em4, ~- `/l7D/ Date ~II )~~~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRFiM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our you tA. C. ion Position Job - N Hours Period U Duration (WeeK/Month) (N of Months> At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of mY service should be approximately: City Position Salary x Time = Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value o4 mr services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth~sp or is organizations. ~ \ Name ~' ` ' ¢/u J ~ ~ Address i~/tP/~A ~~!/,('Q//)L4'/ICIG /~ q ~ Oate /~~~ ~'/ ~~9~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, i work the following hours in support of our youth. e}~c-~; c<- ~. 6U-mon ~ls _~lUC~ ~O X717- I (rGVn4_Z,e. U. r-+o~,MS a~`/yv=.3~2 zati on Position Job - N Ho s P d Duration --~~ totp~ (WeeK ontA) <N o4 Months12 y At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: "l on Salary x 6 In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, 3 direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name Sn\,P SCC,~~ T{u~ry ~30~J~ Address ~~~ ~r~LSh••Y<rl)f.~/~/~/,tea C~~9/~p~ Date _ //_~„~~~1UM i,~ ~- ~ ~i '~ C~ C i, CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the follaving hours in support of our youth. ~ra~ ~ ~~ // ~1 !aa rnt ~V.SO f9ili~/'/v ~ 11'~tc~"~~ Dr ganizat~on Position Job - 8 Hours s><y,~ - 3, 0 G~ecLly Saco s d 0 - .~. o ~. Nr~/mcs. - ~~ S A~Oi1~ !O/NOC Period Duration CWeeK/Month) CM of Months~~ / At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of mr service should be approximatslyi ~0/ 1t~4.~ °~/G tion Salary x Time Amoun In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, i direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City glues to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~i,~,~/ JYIo~ .1 t6 ~~~ Address y% %9$~ ~(imf~y~,~. Date 9/QIJ ~ ~y /yJ`~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PP..O GRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, L worK the following hours in support of our youth. ~~{ y{,5 ~~a~t,« yo why 3.t>b~,s = 6onc z.o [Jakty°~jd/fy~,xn~Fl+s 3e2 ~ j/.SU ~{ii.1 /'~,M~ i'i'lc~~;~ l ~ /YknH, /oma,Nrs Dr ganizatron Posr tr on Job - N Hours Period Duration (WeeK/MOnth) CN of Months>~oZ At the current rate for similar post tiona paid 6y the City, the value of mr service should be approximately: City Position Salary x Time In lieu of direct reimbursement 4or the value of my services I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youyt/h apor is organizations. BY/ V~ ~+ U ~1(~~C~ra.~j ' sLxc-ia~[cf[l~. Name !//.(~ gene ~~~ 'x/27 Address 9ys~ ,~.»/n-tl Date ~fytJ. ~~/ /y'9/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROC3RAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. ;~YsD ~eao tuA~ti ganization Position Job - Duration th) tM of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of mr service should be approx imatelyi on ary x 2 /v~ .~ `~//~ c me = Amount in Lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to oif set the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~uSSeIL ~R+sr~~, ~ `Muzo 3W Address IM1~4C WIAIt Q/j 6/l¢ Qi) 51. ..// GF~w AUCI{1~ ~•1 91731 Date Il-ly-91 CITIZEN`S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamon gay 1 worK the 4ollowin9 hours in support of our youth. HtpcQ cow..b- gen i~tion on ~M~~ca y.0 Gq+«s 2.0 ~~~,,,, ~_is - st Hours w«w a f ~i ,c y .~. ~°~ 1.s+-+~+'~ b ~ iW.s '~ Period Dur atlon %t~ / (WeeK/MOnih> (M of Mon/~D At 4he current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value o4 mY service should be approximately: i ion Salary x 3 In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of mY services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. 1 /t - Name L1l Address x(31 /~o// L4s.1 n ad/~t+•Lm~~t Date ~~ ~y~py CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROC~RR~M As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. panwn< z_,~.s,,~~4.o-k ,~m~ P/n nn.r~ %y 7~~? Organization Position Job - N Hours d Duration cWee on th) (N of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the Ci ty~ the value of my service should be approximately: Y Position Salary x Time a ~/a U L Amoun In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~?~YP ~a-CP /moo-~y~/ Address o y3~ ~/h P~g~~ 9r~.e A/f.,.._ ~ory, [v/[/ Date I~ //,~/9~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 work the following hours in suDPort of our youth. s ~" ganization ~G~A ~RhL1lCE-~a ~k~k •~ F ~x Swto~~ in0 U ,Slrw~k 'L.c~ +.Jt`,fK ,'1 f i1 r~ t•~ tu~oa4 ~s ~ 3~2 11 Hours Periotl uuration ~\ (Week/Month) t8 of Month~U Ak the current rate for similar positions paid br the City, the value of mY service should be approximately: on Salary x O / [.,s.v ~~df l~ Time = Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal supDOrt that the City gives to non~Jprofit~/you th/~spor/t~s organizations. Name G~Y~~G/~r¢L~- 11/`f- ~ a,J ~ u l).~ ~l_ F Address ~~~15 ~N t~t6itt~ ~h• Date 1~ ~~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. L~ .~.o .+iLlwez&ic..~~'~~~-{ mo.,~rl(e~d~jb 1~~-+,D pprH.~c~ so I~Iw~~{~/><~ r+o~TM /?"d ~nncµ YNLh,T.NLS I. we,l mow:l4 ~.. NaCl..i~~ on Position Job - N Hours Period Duration ~ y CWeek/Month) CN of Mon th~ J At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City: thr value of mr service should be approximately: on Salary x Time Amoun In lieu of direct reimbursement for the val u• of my services, t direct that these monies be used to off ar4 the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name /~ Rs AAA [iN Address IU'ro (~ N~u,cRn9+~i". ~~~.. Date ~: v I U ,. I EN` 5 CDST Fz6CdV EFtY PRdGRAM GITIZ citizen of Rancho Cucamon9a> t worK the 4ollowin9 Hours in suPDort As a oath. ~ =~~ of our Y ,/ ~o11Y~ Dur at~on th s) i" Period (8 „a~TI~S 00•` Job _ p Hours tWeeKMon th) ~ ion n+tFk .Z ~,,,0,~7/,S Or zation ~MP R4 3~,t5 Z f wcck LjJJ'11C h~p'quo- ~,petl./.QSSf~00Ch SFR the value o4 BgS1~C~ctl~ psitions paid by the City, At the torrent rate 4or ~omx imatePY~ my service should be aPP ~,.~~~v ?ime x City Position Sal arY value o4 mY services, 1 direct support that the City reimbursement for the used to offset the minimal In lieu o4 direct anizations. that these monies be oath sports or9 gives to non~Dr ofit Y •S fF ad-~ Name ~7! t flr.~baN Address ~ ~ ~~~ Oate CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROD RliM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. 3t ~/ ~( s"" - GD ~~pckic~ 3. o ura-ck 37n(>~°~f'~'``~ ° 3a Q-a~n.e- ol'.o u~e¢.~G ~17nv7d~ G Ct1n C(JOL7.~L fV~-tr ~-~ n, i M aK~Ia. (a 7na9t/~I. FP on ositi on Job - N Haurs Period Duration ~f b/ (Week/Month) (M of Months) / At the currrnt rat• for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: y Position Salary x Time = in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of mY services, i direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name /~/e~~sl~ C ~7/ (yam ~l~L+C ' ~~ ~~r~a~ Address 1. / p ~ ~ ~ ~ 9J~.~/nLL~t ~mC`i.(~_. `G_lCii~7/ l! 71KG' ` Date ~~ ~/~/% C ITI2EN`3 COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our rou th. ~' ~ t1 /a"a s-S° flc.l.N Moc NI~D - < / ~~ p~ $ 8 -! ~ Esc PoN~/{ d mK~U~ ~ ! i Y 'r ~ ~~y ~~ = ~w 20 PPgPri /41(~~W / 1/ n zation Position Job - M Hours Pe iod Duration 4 tWeeK/Month) ttl of Months) At the current rata for similar positions paid by tha CIly, the value of mr service should be approximately: Y ty Position Salary x Time = in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name .7 j ~1.' i i0 (/~ EG~i4y~ Address IoFOI i~~GLr'it9i e~ ~1~-I'P LOn1~ Date ~~ /C~ ~~~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga I worK the following hours in support of our youth. j t /S' f. `fv'~/7if~Y'I4-~_ i<~N-YF/rj. SW ~an. a2 Fir/~C -/ Y`t~it ,~O zation Position Job -, if Hpurf Period Duration ~~ <Week/Flonth) <M of Months) At the current rate for similar posi tlon paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximate) ys ~~ ;~~ ti ~`~-< C'~-t~ Qc2~i /GiS -7r ~ /'"l0 Jr~J ~~~ ~~e3Db City Position lary x Time Amount in lieu o4 direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that 4hese monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~ /~/~~~sa~ Address ~ 99PF A/~irr~3% Oate ~ /H /4/ CIT22EN'c,_, Cp S-I- RECOVERY PRpGRAM of our 1YOV tA, of Rancho Cucamon gay I work the following hours in suPPort ~ ~S o c'aAtN //~i~f7~cc~ bd$J C Organization /i'//r ~bgrµ ~yk`r/v ~c ~ ) ~..~~ ,., ~.d:%1.,,.i i5lcgs?A=c~ Position Job - # Hour '~ ~ ~'~ 6 /'1v.u~ s Period ~Week/Mon th) duration ~# of Months) mY sew cc rrent rate for s~ •, a shoultl be aPProximate PY Si lions paid by the City, the value of ',. i_j NFL ,.i/; Ci tr Position glary ~{, x Time __ i ~.XC.~ Amount gives tto sn mon ees be lv sedstoent for the value on-Profit youth sPo ~ts sor gan ezations ofsuPPOrtvthat ,the direct City i Name / lQ9 Address i ~ 5~~'~/~~o i KiN4 A~vc=tiv~_ AtT4 r4« 2 c'~1 ~ i w i Oate 1. ,y. yi CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROORANI As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. ~I)' // n i h6ec>0 ~eM~'1 1"('Rc~~u ~i.0 Ne xy /00 G,h,.e z.o l~o~~t ~2 ~ixe~-1/s ~i>~ m __l.._ : ca.,~ 4 (1 _ ~ ~~ I .f}~~ 3.O Now. (~ U /~N ~f1 [Yp` .axe 2.akows 3a Sm~s on Position Job - N Hour Period ~-r ation CWeeK/MOnth) CN o9 Months) 19' At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of mr service should be approximately: ity Position Salary x Time = In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value o4 my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name /~ fix/ ~o~' ~~17`e~ Z -~wS~ Address 922'g G.- /' g ~ ~R C.r~ Dace ~r-/y-9/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 worK the following hours in support of our youth. 3 NRS S.y/~rr+t ~- yPP x L KFK~ ~//RS OV/$AYG (uCEK ~ s howrN D /~ / S~ ~9G/~ 2TF.~5 3 /ftt - ~~vr.e SyT. -e Organization Position lob - N Hours Period Duration (Wel_k/Month) CM of Months) 03{y{s'~ ~o ~xyf,5~= /No At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, th a ue-6 1 • of my service should be approximately: ~ (o Q G y Position Salary x Time Amount to lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies 6e used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~~ ~~~i/ete~` - /~7ie /f9EG ~ N`i.te~ ~..C E-, Address `/23/ rpi yocTi sr/rEer - ~ig.yaHu CUcA~'1JNGn. Date ~~~ ~ `> `J/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga: I worK the following hours in support of our youth. coneH Poa~coiT FX: N~-.; •.K Pek--~..,. • ~(~/?~~ro.~yr~ K Snoa mar/ ~ ~3 D Y S () u An [opcfl 6 S w K .~ ~ Y SrlaviN s~>~%?^ Organization Position JoD - 8 Hours Period Duration r~ CWeeK/Month) (M of Months l(i At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City the value df mr service should be approximately: Y Position Salary x Time = t to lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services: I direct that these monies be used to offiset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name nen~J M ~~ack Address /l so s.~a 13eaM4iPO. ya /?.~,~~/ 1 Date // • /N' 9/ ~ ~- CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM ~ r~° As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK of our youth, i1rl1S ~dAL 'So zation EK~~ ti on s y8 i~ ~ khe following hours in support~- a ~~ ~,~>r« 6~~~~~ i, ~:~sua,~/ (zAMES ~~G.P~u/~- 7(r[ GN Or fAS ^ ~::~>SN~S ~.r~,~~~a~,~ 6~0,~ Cot3; l c s C4.~ic ~ ~iLP - s Hours CWeek/Month) At the current raft for similar positions paid by the City, mY service shoultl be appr oximatelys ,~ ~ ~ >; ~ ~ r :.. ~.~ ~ Q~ ao~ uuration CM of Months) ~Z~; ,~ v' 8 the wlue ofi~r y Position Salary x Time a Amoun ;n lieu of direct reimbursrment for the value of my services, I direct that khe se monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name f--~'>~ix<:~//(~(/ L~(,/GL~~ /~ /~~1 Address ~~796 ~~t~,iA `~' FT L~M.~+ T/~ fate ( ~~ y/ 5~ CITI2 EN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAIM As a citizen of Rancho Cuc amonga~ I worK the following hours in support of our Youth. - ~.o s/w.c K `~ ' N n ~~~~I Ms„~y,~r. NP ~P/i~n~G/ 6A,.-rte bS "9Z~ ',, , / ^"'~~K '.!( `/ ~ Af Y .NO...Yn'r 3~ (frf}-p MEEt1N 6Arre - .•?. o i>'i+S w,e X `l = / hr~NTJFf b f ~3a. ' CoRcN q}~ir - a o N.[ u N ~ s 6 x ~/.wo nrr' _-.3.~ ization Position Job - N Hours P4 UNrof,MOn th s)I 1eeK/Month) At the current ratr 4or similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be aDDr oximateiye W ion ary x me In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value o4 my services, 3 direct lhat these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~2 ^~= A 6 - Address ''~ c'A.H E!+-nom.) 2~C-• Cd -~ - Da t e ~~~ `~/y~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROC3RAM As a citizen o4 Rancho Cucamonga, I worN the following hours in support of our youth. `~ra,k~ 3.0 ,7 ....5 ~,.0 51^~0~> ~./ o Kv~o~LS Asst~Coa[,~ Go. Drg nization Position Job - N Hours Period Duration f ee onth) CN of Months> At tha current rate for similar positions paid by the City~fEA~ clue of my service should be approximately: on Sal arr x Time in lieu o4 direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to o44 set the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name L J ~L ~ 51 ee Address ~7 ~3 \G{AV.~~ a/~~, ~.HV^c. C~ Date CtI14~R1 'T CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGR!-1M As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. PQIiCIICE - 30 WEEK 5 n,odfFs Rss~t. ~ h CA /kE _ 2,0 M [(iEEk ~f {UedftiS > n~c c~r~es- is n,e~f~ G ~oN+~s urgan ~zatron Posit: on Job - M Hours Period Duration <Week/Month) (M of Months) /•5f G At thr current rate for similar positions paid by th• City value of my service should br approximately: /~ City Position Salary x Time = in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~r""'!aS l`3'I~G C/y CI Si/ Address 936 Au/~9~ Date /~- I`~- `~ ~ CITIZEN'S GgST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the fallowing hours in support of our youth. .~ ssr, ~cnrE 3.0 ~~ S~„~~ry,5 fI ySo Co,~ch+ r~n._ Z~~'.~r~te a o lt/e~ ~~s Organization Position Job - # Hours Period Duration tWeeK/Mo~rt/th? t# of Months? ~K7 >t,~~= ~i~ /~`-' At the current rate for similar positions paid by the Citr, ~~R`"valve of mY service should be approximatalys ~~ on Salary x Time ~ in Iieu of direct reimbursement for the value of mr services, I direct that chase monies be used to off sat the minimal support that the City gives to non-profi t•you th sports organizations. Mama _.>T~<l~ ~G~~L=~ ,p Address ~J~~ s91Cd~Gi'~i rJr ~~~ LOit'1~ ~ 9/7~/ ~ Date ~~ ~~~~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. ASST ~C.7'!Cf-3.0 oU~K S~vla/TH5 f1Y5o ~~d ~ag„-.~ -a.b u/~~1c ~J ir/o~yr~/5 Organization Position Job - M Hours Period Duration CWeeK/Month) (M of Months) 3,cyvs- 60 ~i At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, /tl~e`value of my servicr should be approximately: on Salary x Time = In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my serviccs~ I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~N~L ~7~~.CfdC~1. Address Y9s~9 ,~_,r,-,~„~p yam, r,ILrr-a ~U~~r~ ~ 9io~ Date ~~ ~7 ~Y~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. • I n //!! ~ i ~ --~ l~'uz-?.~,~1 f -'.-mil ;r''' s, ' ~ v ~ I `~ °~. ~ ~ ~' Z "' dec. Organization Position Job - N Hours Period Duration CWeeK/Month) fN of Months) .SxYsy ~2 ,~ y x ~l ~. s,~ ~ >< ~ . 6 y~ At the current rate for similar positions paid by the Ci ty ~th~e ,yal ue of mr service shou ld be approximatelys on Salary x Time = ~(5~ Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal suppork that the City gi ues to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~ ~,)'; nit ;i ~ h 7J !1 Address i;~ ~ ~~+5 , ; r t~ Date ~: i, ~ ~~1~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga I worK the following hours in support of our youth. z organization Position - Job - N Hours Period Duration fWeeK/MOnth) CM of Months) 3f y><s- rvo ~yNyy= 3~ 1~,~~ `1 Ak the current rate for similar positions paid by the City~ue of my service should be approximately: /~ Position Salary x Time Amoun In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services: I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support th a! the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name Address -~j~,i,. C~ Date ~~L~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, t warK the following hours in support of our Youth. ~ P15'~.CoaC~L ~ WECK 4+ an Position .tab - M Nours Period Duration CWeeKMonth) (it of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: on Sal arr x Time > :n lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal supRort that the City glues to non-pro4it youth sports or ganixations. Name ~bM ti 17W"`X'~fi Address (~4~~ S.~n.rzvL B,vE. ilt,JA i-6MA oate ~l~Lli-f °~t CST22EN'S COST RECOVERY PR Ot3 RFiM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our Youth. f r ! ~ t,Y ,: ,., f Org~ization Position Job - A Hours Period Duration <WeeK/MOn th) <M of Months> ~xf1X_7.5 "~oD ~ x L/ x ~.,5 0?0 ~- ~ f. ~ ___----- At the current rate 4or similar positions paid by the Ci ty~r/t a ~ralue of mr service should De appr oximatelr: p •~` City Position SatarY x Time = In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of mr services I tlirect that these monies 4e usetl to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. 1 Name LfNCwi.ic , f.{r ~-~c ~ Address 1`~J ~(j/~~f-.• !. -l ~~ ~%13u Date .'~~~_~'~_ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. ~C~S(5~'AA(+' 1 NIZS. ~E Ac~-lc e.5 ~ 3IfRS . G ,u.es A YSO ~ Cogc-)'I T~Fn.IS 3 fE2S ~~e~e~JO,ek rJ AAoN'E'~5 Organization Position Job - M Hours Period Duration CWeeKlMonth) (q of Months) At th• current rate for similar positions paid by the City, th ue of my service should be approximately: ~ / y Position Salary x Time = Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies 6e used to o445et the minimal support that the City gives to non-pr of i,t youth sports organizations. Name `J-I EP ~ R nli ~l.l R~ Address 9x31 1 / ~n 1oc-E-i n Sf'~-` tr,q~µpn{Gh Date ~U`l. ~~i ]~9 CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cuc amonga~ I worK the following hours in support of our youth. ~ifcfiG~ y0 ~ .Si~pn~ic /nrmeJ Z•O ysnn/is Organization Position Job - N Hours Perio Durat'on tWeeK/Month) tN of Months) i.~yG ~: 9 At the current rate for similar positions paid by the Citr~ th~,v~1~u•~ of my service should be appr oximately~ //~~ ~~~ itY Position Salary x Time In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. 'erg: Name d.2d-Qt.t-~ff Ktte~i ~~JJ ~~ #7p '" ~' ' ~~'nu'r^ Address 7y)7 Jon.,„iP /cd. U // Date ~f17J, fC~~(~y~ CITI2EN~g Cps-r RECOVERY PROGRAM of our 'youth, of Rancho Cucamonga, ( Work the following hours in support ISCJ 3l-C~C.~ FiSS%. CCYICH ~TrtE .._ 2 a/, WEElter ~ ~ ganization Position Job ~~,u _.~~ wE ErL ~ MV cWeek/Mon th) vuration (M of Months> At the current rate for '2 ~ c~ ~ ~~ '~ my service should he s\milar ~~2 aPPr oximate pysi tions paid br the City, th~(•/ v~fue of on Salary x ,. , ~~/~ 'e110Vn t 9hves tto sn on ~pr ofiteyou th ss oeoff set the valuma;fsmy services, I dire mini ports organizations, oPPOrt that the Ci tyt Name Ss 7,3$(J E NE 1~NAcY CF ~-AC~KpM* \i ut Ciic~ GiRtS 'd3/ ~+C+.LA Date //'~~/_9/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRfyM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, i work the following hours in support of our youth. Pf,f~rru a r.,..u Organization Position Job - N Flours P d Duration (We onth) CN of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, thl/vklue of my service should be apDroximately~ on Salary x Time = In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value 04 my services, I direct that these monies 6e used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name .TOfL ~AN2t~ /~' ST Gp/~C~ ~~~ Address (^N/Sr GJ97vl /521tlf,f AUr-~ ~'~~ Date _hIOU I ~( CSTIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRR.M As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. C ~ ~C lv ~~S EE i ~ /~ONTiS~S zation Position Job - N Hours Period Duration tWeeK nth) C8 of Mon ths> ~xy><~= 1~/~ At the current rate 4or similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: on Salary x Time = Amount In lieu of direct reimbursemen! for the value of mY services I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports orgahizations. Name ,da~.~...._. h,~,.~~--- Address'l.zy~ ~u'ra.r(, i ~ ly ~~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamon gay I work the following hours in support of our youth. /'IS57. CoAC// ~R+e r.i f - V //owas ~we12 ~o wtow{~1 raAw:S - Z No~.ts/wrr1C L a+wNy /-~YSO Sccr.L l~~E~~ (jAHES 3//. ,cs ~w ~rL Organization Position Job M Hours Period /r aw}4f Duration <WeeK/Month> (N of Months) G >< v >< G = 'ivy -2xvx(a 4A 3xyx/~ ~,~ AL the current rate for similar positions paid by the Cif- t p value of my service should be approximately: y ~T on Salary x Time s In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies 6e used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~c HA.tp p/~ `~ Address _ ~9r,t TrgK A~~A co-.,,o Date //-ly-4i CIT22EiJ'S COST RECOVERY PROORF1h1 As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worn [h• following hours in support of our youth. AG~^~ ~~ <WeIN/Month) fM of Months) Le~ /ss. crntat,_ yo w<,/,- s w,n.!'1'j At the current rate for slmiiar post tiona paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximafely~ City Pool lion .~ ary x Time [n Iieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizstions. Namr Nr,.E+ /K. Address ~itS3/ /~~ Dv.C LL• iLn~ew,a oats //-/V-9i ft ECQVERY pROCRF'M in CITIZE.P1,8 COST ~n9 .h°urs suDP°rt Rancho Cucamon9a+ I worK the 4011 ow a citizen o4 our YpO th~ .._._ par ati on ~~ Mon ths> ~'~ ~ Perio tN of d th> ,/ a. _ N H°urs <WeeKYMon y U o Position Job ~~~/~s; anizat+on the value of the CitY+ for similar Pos+tions Paid by At thevicer ehool dt be apProx+matel Y• ~~~~ mY set L~~ ~/1 Amount n x on Sal arY City Positi vices. 1 direct 04 seme^t 4se the mina mal s PPort that the Ci Y 4or use or San In li~he5e mon~o4 Le+YO th sports t izations. that t° non-P gives ,~ Name ,. gddress \ 1 ~ °t\ O ate CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, T worK the following hours in support of our youth. ~~~ r 1~AdiCE ;3 p ~.l .fir -~. o ~~ ~~ S y /1?cx/T~lS ~rr~s Organization Position Job - N Hours Period Durat ion tWeeK/Mo n th) CN o4 Months) / .~.~ 1/ ~ J = la 0 _.Z K ~~ >< ~~~ _ ~ At the current , rate for similar positions Daid by the Cli the value of my service should be approximately: y Position Salary x Time = In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, 1 direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to nan-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~7~~1a Nce~~ Address ~T~ ~/l»~W/~ ~L~~ ~~iq ~)"i'i~ ~.1~, 9~7a~ Date Il-/~-9/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRF~M As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, i work the following hours in support of our youth. 1~Am ~om a ~jic n uv. ~ smo~~is on Position Job - N Hours Perio Duration (Week///Month) ,/CN of Months) At th• current rate for similar positions paid 6y the City, the value of my service should be approximately: ition Salary x Time = In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of mr services, I direct tha! these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name -PJ ~, ~~~ `~~ ~ ,~(yLLC1~i-. Address Date ~~~~ ~y ~~~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. (3anner aO l~rs nrP~m cl-rct, ~3 hrb wkly. Sm+hs ygMES a•o wi<t~ Nm+h~ PhOr~ Con{uct r WKIy tit cCS, ~l hrs ..CiyyM-~-hS Dr ganization Position Job - M Hours Periotl - Duration (WeeK/Month) CM of Months) e3~ `/t 5'= ~D At the current rate for similar positions pai~y t'~/~l t+., the value o4 my service should be approximately: l'l r Position Salary x Time a In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to of fact the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizaFiona. Name _t7~nn 1~i'e rra Address /1'(p,29 V~~ne~~rd Love.. ~,~ Dale I/•/i1-,~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. 'So /~P, ation Posi On Job - N FiourS Per1o0 DUrdtl on tWeeK/MOn th) tp of Months> At the current rate for similar poslti ons paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximatvly~ y Position Salary x Time = In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used !o offset the minimal support that the City glues to non-pr Dill youth sports organixati ons. Name /\ CI Yet 4 [ "] 11 .r +~ Address 7~ S ~ ~~//yy~~ //~~/+ ~i~~ ,,//~~ fT.~(~ Date / /- / y - 9 ~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. ,iZe- Tim fy/Dm St w~ .5' zation Position Job - N Hours Period Duration (Week/Month) <tl of Months) At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service shouid be approximately: ~cz ~.a~l'~b'sD Iw /D-~1 l~ ~ °~ on -Sal ary x Time = In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to nan-profit youth sports organizations. Name . J N ~ +~ ~~ (; ~! J~/~6// Address ~e era •~/ RrkNO~N '/~ L ~/~ Date /I-!`~-C/I CITIZEN`S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. Ss~ ~C~= ~ere• ~ Lt1~ ~j zation Position Job - M Hours Period Duration CWeeK/MOnth) Cil of Months) S>c y,c S- ~~ At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the vatu• of my service should be approximatetys sv~ /~ /~~, ~A~~ City Position Salary x ~ Time Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of mY service s I direct that these monies be usetl to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name "T~IE"xEIA .C~iC~R•CDSsp1 Address 7771 C° Al.L E O.PE~Q Date ~~~~~'~i/ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PR013 RAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamon gay [ work the following hours in support of our youth. //'n av ~ t/J .~ z atlon Position Job - K Hours Period Duration CWeeklMonth) C8 of Mon ths> Sx y {S . /l37% At the current rate for similar positions paid 6y the City, the value of mr service should be approximately: ~ ~~~ ~~ 5~ /d~ lrh~ y Pos~ti on Salary x Time Amoun In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies 6e used to offset the minimal support that thv City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~A/P p~~~yf~j~W,4j Address /G/~ C/S~l?lff?ai sr Date ~~-~`r ~~~ ~.[ ~ ~ c..`r.44..t - ~.Uzt,L (~Q,u~ ~JUn.('t, `~j¢+c .,~Cw WY/r'.(. ILL O'."GA.~•t n lw ~d ~~ ~~ ~~~x ~.~ x log lG !rte o ,me x / U ,m~~,~o ,~aGC ~ `~l3nla-~ ' $$,2, Spa ~C~'~ ---(~ G 3G tccnw X =2 f 37c ao h-i~r u-~t- ~ //~ tac~e 19.E o-n ,c y/o"lam _ `~ l 9.2, o-n-fl h~~ ~~o: y~o ~o`~,~ a 3~~a.„.~ < y 380 ~ ~~On/[A. ~ "fJ~yo-D ~`b~AL IAA, ~ U-~ ~a~~, ~}b'G. o G CITT2EN'8 COST RECOVERY PROL3 RAF1 As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK tM following hours in support of our tooth. Go ca.~~ X ~ `1 ~s on Posi tlon Jdb - N Houre Peried ( Ovratton (Week/Mon th) CM of Hon th sJ qt the current rat• paid for similar potitiont paid br the Clty~ the value of my service sAould hr approzima CslY: Citr Position Salary x Time ~ Amount to lieu of direct reimbursement for the ualur of mr servicest t direct LAat these monies be used to offset the minimal support chat fh• City gives to non-profit youth sports organ izati on n. Name lJ b n ~}~v r n a l Address lis7 '~ / ~~~~~5~ Date -11T ~ b GITI2E7J~S COST REGOwIIERY pROORAFI As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonge~ 1 work th• foltowinq hours In support of our you th_ Ft~id. mn~r• 3yrs m..a r ~` L ~- Conch IS h 1/ 1,J 10 m nization Position Job - N Hours Period Duration (WeeK/Mon ttJ (M o4 Hon to s) At the current rate paid for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be apprvxlmately: City Position Salary x Time ~ Amount to lieu of direct reimbur semen[ for the value of mr services, I direct that these monies be used to off sat the minimal support that !h• City gives to nonprofit youth sports or ganizalions. Name ~~ L t~MS Address L Dale I l ~, l b CITIZEN'S COST RECOtiJERY PROORAhI As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 work the feitewinq hours In suppor! of OVr youth- nation Position .fob - M Nours Period Duration CWeek/Month) (M of Months? Fit the current rat• paid for similar post !Ions paid by the Lity, thr ualue of my service should be approximatetyz Gitr Position Salary x Time ~ Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, t direct that these monies be used !o offset the minimal support that tA• City gives to non-profit youth sporLS organizations. Name ~PdG 1 ~ V ~1~ ~ 2 Address ~ ~ Z ~ ~ot~lC~.~ Cd !'1_\L _ ~• L. Date ~1 ~~ fe CITIYEN~S COST RECOVERY PROORFaFI As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga 1 worK the following nourc in wpport of our youth. ~J' hqC(~ ~dti/ Team Mom ~ X ~y~ ' ~- Mn1,~rV(' la zatl on p Itlon Job - M CM of Months? At the current rat• paid for similar Dositions paid by the City the value of my service should be appr oxlmately~ Citr Position Sal arY x Time ~ Amount to lieu of direct reimbur semen[ for the val w of mY s~rvices~ 2 direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that khe City gives to non-profit youth sports organlzati ons. Name ~ P~/Y I Treil i ~}'~- t C(~~ Address fo ~v 1.5 M ESQ ~ S~- Data _)i CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROORM'1 As a citizen of Rancho Cucamon pa, ) work eh• folloWinq hours in support of our roach. ~ Sr.V t~ S{, w ~a zati on Position Job - N Hours Parlod Duration CWeek/Mon th) SM of Mon thsT At the current rate paid fvr similar positions paid br the City, th• value o4 my service should ba appr oximataly: Ci tr Position Sal err x Time ~ Amount In lieu o4 dlract raimDVr Bement for the vacua of mr aarvices, t direct that these monies ba vsad !o off sat the minimal support that th• City gives to non-pro4i! youth sports or ganizations. Name Mary S'~(0.C~ Address ~O 3 Z ~ ~ ~ ~~ Dat• ~l ~l t/ C I7'I2EN'S COST REC~IlERY pROQRM-1 As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 work the following hours in support of our youth. lc~ c ~a~•/ vtrt+c~ S h,~ c~~ IO nn ganization Positl n Job - N Nours Period Duration fWveK/Month) <M of Mon lhsT At the currene rate paitl for similar post ll bns paid br the CILy, tM value of my service should 6e appr oximatvly~ City Position Salary x Time . Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement fer the value of mY services, t direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the Clty qi ves to non-profit youth sports organizati ons. Name Tom ~ rpa) ~ 1t(_~~ Address ~D(eI15 Mesa~4 Sf 4.r Da t• II' IG C I T I 2 EN' S COST RECOl1ERY PROOR6iN1 As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 worN the following hours in support of our routh- 3 0 •~eams X 'Dc. ~. zatl on Posltlon Job - > SM of Mon th s> At Lhe current rat• paid for timllar posltiona paid by the Citr, the value of my service should be approximately: City Position Salary x Time ~ Amount In lieu o4 direct ralmbursement fey the Value of mr services I direct that then monies be used to offset the minimal support that 4he City gives to non-profit youth sports organization e. Name TOE m ~~vn5 - Address Date CITIZEN'S COST REC OoIIERY PR~Q RFaM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamon pa, I work th• fallowing hours In support of our tooth- >Gt-L Q~StS~"~.tla o5 IS ganizati on Position Job - N Hours Period Duration <Week/Mon th) (N of Months) At the current rate paid fvr similar posltionf paid by the Cf ty, th• value of my service should be aDDroxima bly= Citr Position Sal arY x Time s Amount In lieu of dfrect rsimbur lament for the valve of my services, I direct that Mese monies be used to offset the minimal support that tM City paves to non ^pr of it youth sp arts organizations. Name Q ~' M Pw~l Address Date CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY pROORANI As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the folipylnq hours in support of our routh. 30 +eaw~.s ganization PositicGf Job - M Houra Perio Duration (WeeK/MOn tA> (M of Months? At the current rate paid for similar positions paid br the CILy, th• valve of my service should be apprvxima t+ly, Citr Position Salary x Time ~ Amount [n lieu of tlirect reimbursement for the value of mr services, I tlirect that these monies be used to offset the minimal suppor! that th• City gives to nvrprofit youth sports or ganizations. Name ~~ , Address Dale CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY RROORAI"1 As a citizen of Rancho Cuc anon qa, 1 work the following hours in support of our Youth. Gh~cG ScorQl~e.Q'¢+' on Posi.klon Job - N Hours Parled Duration CWeek/MOn th) SM of Months) At the current rat• paid {vr similar positions paid Dy the Cily, the value of my svrvic• shgvld be approximately: CilY Position Salary x Time ~ amount In lieu of elrect relmDUr semen! for thv ualu• of my saruice s, 2 direct that these monies bs used to offset the minimal support that !ht City gives to non-profit youth sports organlzeti ons. Name ~ ~~ ~ rS Address O G YYI (~~?~•11 L, Dat• _.li II.(i( CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY RROO RF>1M As a citizen of Rancho Cuc emonga, 1 worK th• foliowinq hours in support of our rou th. 'Dc.c.L )~o,.~a111ean5 S~,r ~K _ -~rv~• Organization Po~tlon Job - N Hours Period Duration (WeeklMon M> (N of Honths) qt tho current rate paid for similar positlens paitl Dy the City, the u aloe of my svrvic• should be aDDroximately~ City Position Salary x Time ~ Amount In lieu of tlirect reimDUr sement far thv value o4 mY services, t direct that these monies De used to of Het the minimal support that 4ha City gives to non-pro4it youth sports vrpanizations. Name J10~ ~_S 4u Address 7~ S L• Datt ~ ~ I ~ i~{C,_ CITI2EN~8 COST RECOVERY PRO[3 i2R11+'1 As : citizen of Rancho Cucamon qa~ 1 work tA• following hours in support of our rou th. ~y5b - G®oc-h a 7o hr ~o-(-o. ~ $r. ~idt~~ Age-I~ i zatl on Positl on Job - Pos~4- Pies W aysF htieans fWeek/Mon th) CM of Months) ~i me At the current rat• paid for similar positlens paid by the Citr~ the value of my service should be appr oxima b1Y: City Position Salary x Time ~ Amount In lieu of direct relmbur semenL for the value of mr services I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that Ih• City gives to non ^p roflt youth sports organ izetions. Name ~~ Address Date ~ ~~10 GITI ~EtJ' S C03T RECOVERY pR0[3 RFiM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 work LA• followfnq hours in support of our rou th. A ss~ C~.~-h I r~~ s a d l~r u~ l< 1 Vl? . on Position Job - N Nours Period Duration SWeek?lon th) (M of Months) At tho current rate paid for similar positions paid br the City the valve of my service should be approximately: Citr Position Salary x Time : Amount in lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of mr services, I direct that these monies De used to off se! the minim+l support that th• CItY gives to non-praf i4 youth spot b organizations. Name i`~C/I h Kh U~ A ' Address .57 D Z N1A~Q G~ i ~P /1'1/ A ~• Data ~~b,T~{ CITI2Eh1~3 COST RECOVERY PROOf?L1N1 As a citizen of Rancho Cuccwwnpa~ 1 work tA• following flours in support of our youth. on position Job - N Hours Period Duration CWeek/Mon th> tN of Nonths> At the current rate paid for similar post Ilona paid by the Ci ly, the value of my service should be approxlmatelYs Ci tr Position Sal arr x Time ~ Amount to lieu of dtrrct refmDUr sement for the value of mY avrvicest i direct that these monies Da vaed to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports orpanizati ons. Name .U2~6 1"\~~~~ Address 1O40Q ~Q11V0 Y1 ~. ~. . Date V 1 ~ ~ (p~ Ct~ vK CPe.,r Dhone ca 11) CITIZEN'S COST REC OIlERY PROQRANI As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 worK the foliowiny hours in support of our tooth. >,~acT'CYi.J C.C. Vubl.~ ~+R 1)5 ZOHou('L Yl D0.J pis Organization Pveiti on Job - N Hours Period Duralion ~~CSp-t~p~"^ v(A-CM`~,R- ~ CWeek/Month) (M of Months> l c s n¢a ea~cr~ ke-~ r/W n0cR3 At the current rate paid for similar positions paid by the Citr~ the u aloe o4 my evrviu should be approx lmatelyi Citr Position Salary x Time ~ Amount in lieu of tllrect raimbur semen! for the va)ue of mr aervices~ i direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organization a. Name SAC C `1~~ S 1 ~`~~ Address GT7.~~ ~YQ'C1FG.OE-{'T£_ R L,' q/'7(~' Dat• ~if Q CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROORMI Az a citizen of Rancho Cucamon qa~ I work eh• following hours in support of our youth. At the current rale paid for similar posltlons paid 6r the City the value of my service should be appr oxima N lyt Gitr Position 8alarr x Time ~ Amount [n lieu of tlirect reimbursement for the value of my s,rvices~ I tlirect that these monies be used to oiffet the minimal support that tM City gives to non-profit youth sports vrganiza[ions. Name SF)•Fle`/L MOODN Address t~A3tlrt JOr~l1T,! /'t•L• o,te II ~1(r ~91 tWeek/Mon th) tM of Month,) CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I am donate the following hours in support of our youth. V o_rgpnization ~~~ob '' N Hours Time riod ~ ~~ At the Curren ai defor similar ~s~s within the the value of my service should be appr oximatelr City Position Salary x Time Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value 04 my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the miminal support that the City glues o youth sports organization s~ ~ w ~ ~,~~.., - ,~,.7 ~ ~ ~, ~~ a~~5. -ia _~~~. ~ ~~ ~ 3~~ a7 ~~ `72mr ia~ " ~~ i~~ t~ ~~ ~ ~s ~ - c ~ ~\ ~~ ~ ash J ~~~, ~, CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM Aa a citizen of Rancho Cu:amor.y z.. ( ~.orK the foltawlnq hours in support of our youth. ,~.~• Pa~wa,-n,Gt~ _ ?s' w~ is Or qan fixation Posi Lion Jct: - >• 'fours Period Duration fWeeklMon M> tN of Months) At the current raft paid for rE~m~!•: pos, !ions paitl br M • City, Lhe va1Ve Jf my alruice should be ai.y':.- s.Safi YC Li t.y Position Salary Tlme ~ Amount in lieu of direct rrimhurseme •~` +al w of my seruites, I direct that these monies Ge useG ''-o c,-. minimal support that the Gtr glues to non-profit youth spcr'•_ rations. Name '//=rJ~L~].G~~a--~1LL[+G/t~--...~_ Rddress ~7~ TPR.k: L!/A li. T ~~cH~ e~~imory_~7 Dale 1/' /~•~l -- --- GiTI4~r•t' ~ .. _ ' A4 0. it tr Sen Gc 4am','i _.. __~' of Our ~oV t... R• r P p WnPNrN~CY Piw~~(f1~i Organs 2atiOn Pos~i!on At Lh! [ur^ent rate Dail .: value of mr zen~~r.z ,. ;~~~- C+t'r PosrHim Sat ar-~~ -~ !~i linu of direct re~mtn: _ `hat tne3d nooses •is e,: g; ues to Horror or~t~, c. rr. r. '~~%VER4' PROGRFY9 the following hours .n suppcrt 40 la ~nov~,t~ .. s PQriod Duraticr (WeeY,/Mon th) CM of Mon insr ,•tiont paitl OY M• City, the ~Y: Time ~ Amount al ua of my seruitea~ I direct ~:+nima! support that the fi u~ nuns. Namf W~~'~~ y/._ h~1dr.5s -- 2 ~i MuI~°l`JU y1V c RQI~p CUCctMoNl~cl Uatc ---!~-rv-g(---~ C I (' I c Eht ' S CgST REGOVERI' PROGP.APf 4s +. cite±en G% RantY, r• Cu: arnr.^•ya., I work the 401 lowing hOJr3 in support of OUP VOU U:. ~^ga:v zaticn Ao~+tron Jcb - N Hours Perietl 6uratior (WnW./Month) CM of Mcn thsi ar the ca(.~ant rate paid for timrter pea; bons paid GY the City, the -:,I p~ ~f m. serve re sr:ou t.^. Ea appr ox +matel Y: Ci •; Pis, lion Salary lime ^ Amouit ':ieu of r!i rect re ~mGnr ~,em=n` for Me value of my services, t direct ~~..• toe-n ,-~.,n~e5 _.: ',sac 'c: of+tet the minimal suPPorc thak kha C. tv g~~!en tc non-nro!:t ;~c~th 'spcr tc- er ganiaati ons. = t ^ _. _ _. ___~.._ _____. C. T f I 2'"nt ' ~ ~:: 17 °,ST 32EC01 rERY PROGp,At•i Ae •. :i t, 3en c= ''>an.: ~,.; :u. a,mnr. ~.ir, ! e.ork tAe *oltowinq hour; ;n support C'UI^ VOV Y,.. ~b{] (r1't~.n ~ML•_ _. a0 _ l1)[II~ ~a mmn~`.¢ .-o..:~~zat'_., ?n ,cur. 1cn - q Hours Period Dur ati or (WeeY./Mon th) (q of F'cn th,sr f.' !r.« ;•~r~•en• ripe oald for simper poll tione pain oY Fhe CI t>', the -.. .. ~f .. ~,Erv'r,z ,; :,Ilr: ~z appraxlmafely: ~ rimount ~,uy of w~-ecr r«. m:,~:r ,e:nFCh cur thr value o4 my services, t direct • .. ..._-• _, .... o:. ort th¢ ml nimal xupport ihak the f_I tv .. rC ~.. i'-^r v' ~ 1 ~ Ct ti• iG~f f:_ er yani28t lCrei. ntar,~.; p{1~pICI Fn,~a^"~~\-(~~t l1J.L~_._ -~.,r a 5 a . A~n..L•=Q'_...lbnLLln:14=,t.1 _~ _-~-__~.~~ ryf,nKhe C~.u:n 1. u.v~,a ~.n. Q I'1 J 0 ~s quo '-ii~9iitY~i4.~ T.a e'•';c .. C I "; 12 Et:f ' ~ ~ ": ~C'•.... _~~!ER\' PROGRAt4 as n ci t. zen c? aan".._ ~~„_...~ the Eotlowinq hours .n support of our veutl.. Organ!z t'~. en Pose t: cr, .. PQrioC Duraticr (Weet!/Mon th> (M of Months At thr [arrynt rate paid '. City Pose tii.n ,al ar ~~~~~-- [~: liau of tlirec* re~mtnr :en !hat ihe9e Pr~n iEs ba' uc-'; . ~; ohs tc non-nr ur~t ;•c:, tr -. !.!ons paid by th• Cl ty, Me Y: ~~- Tima ~ anount ~:~uP of m'r services, t direct .•n!mal nvpport that the G c; un5. Name ~~. W~ \~.]tir`L/ fddrr5s ~_ .... .._ gate GiPii~tttia ~,„, p~ORCOPY -: 'I c Ef•: ' o ...,, .~' RECOVERS PROGRAi•l. ^~~~ .: I ! i _ <r ~a n.-;~ ~: '..,,._-,mn:, r t,~cfK the *a1 1 qW i ng hour, , n sUPPOr t ' y :. • •~i OUi~ ': nV tl•. 4 ~y,~~ ~~ p,9 m, sc. t~~~`-7~J 11 Qluj;cs. (~~ ~ ~. ri nl5 W ~2> -~S~c_ppJ~JQ~l. ~._____- _ k t3en+ArYWO~e~~~ 7'u;.^'..lt~cn ?•~<, •,: yr •JcC - p %iours Per+od Dv aticn lWew/Mon tn) Cp of hl^n ths, r' t^~H -.,. ,.-~ir rice o::d f~^ 2r'ar positions paitl trr the Cit>', the C[ .i (•yf~X tmatel Y) "'--__.'i<, :T.n 91 d,. _...____ TIT! a WgOYllt ' ~r•,. ~ ?:' _ ,.. .. ..em~a^ :u^ ?he val ua of mY sero t[es! I dire[t -. -. ~,.;~_ ..: .. .-, p4!s;•t Lha minimal euPPOri that rr,F C~.v ., ~ ~c ~ _.•-..r~•~r ... r;. ,, .r is cr yanizatiun;. 't arse _~ t ~.~.letJ'~ _.f~ ~~Y_?^"5 ~(^~_ ,-x P~ CI-fIZF_r,r'S CL7gT RECOVERI' PROGRFN~{ As ,. cit, Ten of van.. ,•o ru. amrgy?., t worK *.he following hours .n support of our you t... al •~zaticn A~~a~t!un Jcb - N Hour= Peri Duration eeY on th) (M of Mon ihs+ At trye car~~ent rzte ua~d for eim+?ar positions paid by the Cl ty, the -•i.l o~ ~f e.. sp nr!ca ;p.4u1:7 to ap pf oxrmately: C~*; po e~i tii~n Sal are ~, Tlme ~ Amount ?~: ?iea of ~irec+ rr mbnr semen` fir the value of my seruiCes, t dire[: •b.ar ~. ~~e ,a rranie- L: .i~z c• to o'r>et the minimal xuPPort that the C~tr~ 9 "'e ,~. rc non-nr or~t ~. cSth sp cr is or ganizetions. N amy L _ fc~~i~. CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAt't As a citizen of Rancno Cuc a.TOnpa, I work the folFowinq hours in support of Our y0uth. pa.ae.Tr.~'._ia~ ~ - rnut.~ 9~ . p ~ ~, a o ~, 38,E . ~r~, . O gantzatio Position Job - M Hours PerioO Duration Ae.wl.~We4J <Week/Mon th> CM of Months) Af the n~rrent rate paid for simltar positions paid br M e Clty, the v atae of mr service 3h oultl be appr ozimately; City Position Sal arr z Tlms ~ Amount !•i Iiev of oirect re~mbur semenr For the ualus of my services, I direct that these monies t:a used to offset th¢ minimal support that the City g~ues tc nun-profit you to spcrts or ganizelion s. Name y ~///~~ ,, ~ ~ ~ ~.} ,,/~ AJJr.ss ~S/~F.v~wc4/ ,CL2. lf,C. ~G6RCpPl C ITI'c EN'S CDS"lT ?c:'~VER4' PROGI4At1 As a cit,z•r: of Rancho Cu~a.•nony:. ~,cr'r. the fotlawinq hours in support of our Youth. r ~.5~ /tsro . -- ~ /7L~'0 ~ Iua~ ~- 0 ganizati n Position Jcr. _ -cur: Periotl Duration ~-_~1 ~~` tWeek/Mon th) (N of Mon thsi 3~1~~1 V At the current rate paid fnr a •~ 'ti ons pain by the Citr, the value of my service should ce 1>i, c' ~~ ~~.'e1Yi City Position Salary ~ ~' Time ^ Amount [n lieu of direct reimhur sema r,> ~a.l up of my seruius~ I direct that these monies be used to c ~ ~ ~~nimat support that the City gives to nan-pro/fit youth sp cr?~> -- "+tions. Namr .a:r[i~~ ..._._ ..~ Address •$dG6~ ~fil~.,~OQ.et•'104/UG` CITIZEN'S C05? RECOtJERY PR06RAh4 As • cit~z•n of RanUO Cucamonga, i work the 4ollawinq hours in support o4,,aur youth. ratio Position Job - R Hours Period Duration ,p/ (WeekJMontR> (tl of Months) At the current rate paitl for sim~?er pesl tl ons paid ?y the Clty, the u slue df my service should be apprax~matel Y: City Position Saf arr >. Time ~ Amount in lieu o4 direct reimbarsemenf For the valuo of mY seruit:esr I dir•ci That tfiene monies tse used to of+c.et toe minimal fupport that the City gives to non-profit youtR sp crts ar ganizati ons. Moms ~'~[~^^-' 421L/C"C.(a.-c~' " ~ /] Addrees .Ja 7ec~ U1ZC.t rD'~,. Date rlf ,`a<j9/ CITI2EN'5 COST REGCJV ERY PROGRAM As • citizen of Rancho Cucamonga I worK the 4o)lawinq hours in support of our youth. zation Position Job - k Hours Periotl Duration ~~~ / t4MeK/Month) tM of Months) At the current rate paid for similar pesi tlons paid by the Clty~ the value of mr ssrvice sh ouitl be approximatelyt City Positi un Sal arr x Time ~ Amount In lieu of direct re~mbur sement for Ms valve of my servites~ J direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal iupp ort that the Citr gives tc non-profit yov th sports or ganizations. Name _tJ(A~p-Cj Address __~~ ~"Z Tet.k~ ~~__ Date ~,_,_ i~ /~ 9/ CITIZEN'S GO&T REC OtlERY PRUGRAhI As a citVZen of Rancho Cuc amongar 7 work the following hours in support o4 .our youth. • a~ ati on Pnos i~t`i ~o-n~ K Job - N Hoy Period Dur:ti on tWe.k/Mon th> <M of Mon ths> A[ the current rate paid fer slmltar posit) ons palo by th• Cl ty, the value of my s.rvice thould 6e approximately: Ci r,y Position Salary x Tim. ~ Amount In lieu of direct reimbur lement 4or the value of my services, I dir.ct that these monies Le used to of[set the minimal tupport that the City gives to non-profit youtR spar is organizations. Narne ~ ) ~~ Dale ~_~[~9/ ^i s-.~; P~I~kYiiva, pCr~R Ct~F2~ .: .. 'I ~=!•,: ~ .. ... r2ECCYV~R~r PROGF?At-{ a- ..., ~ c= ~.,,,,.~ _,. _; mnr. ~~;, ? worV :h~ -o1 ': owi ng ho•.+r3 ~., suppc. . cur :u'. . ~~. cai~c <~t~~.,r. , - !f Hour= Per~nd bur atier A `y''i,'.,,Oa.~O° (WeeV,'Month. Cq of hlon :hs+ u r,,, ,-~,.: :-~. :-zce 1 +... ro, ?.~r pos. tons paid oy Fhe City, the - .. ;' .: s: v .. _ .~:I'~,.. .op ~r ax,matal Y: . ~'i5i ~ ` .___._ ._.~_. ., Time a PIIIOUn ;;!:. ., :> r.. ,mt.u _<:r~-. '• - ihR eal ue of m'r aeroices~ ! direr: - , -.~~~.-. _ ... .. ~ ,:, .,J*, he m!n~mat euppor: that tha Gc,• .. ~~. _r -..r~a' ' ._.. ._ a gaoizat,on=-. ~s A4 1: ll tr SPf. G: ^f'dn._ -~__. of our Boa th. !8R't' PROGRAf-t he following hours :.. s~a~ort -~--- ~. Periotl Duration <WesV,/tlonth) (p of Mcn ths> P~ the tar ~Nnt lie past; +. ~e.rve :,f rrv se nJ ~::¢ n::*rlc ~.. Li ri Pis: ti~.n .4; ar ?~• lieu of Ci re.cr ....:nw~:f 'hat the 3J r.!aniei i..B ve?,.: ac~!es tc norrnru;~t ;c. tr~ Name ~/- ~Q(~t~nf J~,. 'vato ~ ~~ .~...____._. : ons paitl by Me Ci t>', Ue r: Time ~ Wnouni .ua o4 my sera 7cesr I di reCt -,!mal support tt:ak the C: c; ons. ~i10 cr' ~ T ~R~:yK I Z -_r•f s :.~:~ ~?- ~ LOtJER1' PROGRA(•f ^' ew• .; ou Y„ _ -~ Ju -~. ~.~~'.':, wor Y, the cot owing hours .n supporr ~'-'t'On ~ ~^~ ~:~on ~ ~lor. ~- p Hours Perrod Uurat~ ~.. '~'h'~.-,..D,'.'.__!_,_., <WeeY/Mon thl (q of M^n,t,s~ u' '^` .: yr '•°^' race pa%d fnr sir!mr?er poaJ lions paiA try the Ci tY, thr - ~PGr~-x :mate; y; .--.. ~.~.n Sa; ar-_-_'• Time wnouni ;< y:,.ec r ~t;r ~e:e=.. , oi' the oaf up of m• _ ~ r serur[es, t direct ... •c r,~, _r,rU~.f`~ .... > oi'.'`.t tha m!nimat S<upporc that the G :, --. -F:r is ,r ~~ani zatiun5. Y7~i1(iEttii ~ , Pt3CiR Cti7p'~ G I >• I ~ =as ' S .. .. ._' : ~Rl" PR06RAI•t As a [if.r±en cf Qar.]r;: '_v __ of our youtA. the fol towing hours .n suPPc"' p^ n~:aticn Pose t; an Period Duratipr <Wee V./hlon th) (p of P1=n tr,sr A! the turryn! rite Gard +.:~ vg,l:~e Of rtv fierv~Ge ir`•.O~f1:: . •ons paid by the Cl tr, thr Ci!y Pos, ii r•n Salar-~~ ~~~- ?•+ lieu of dr rec~~ r..~mGnr _e.~~ that t;,e3e m~iries !.e us:': g~~+es tc non-nrurt ;'ca. [7• :. Name .._L'-_`^«~y^: ^/_,Y_0.'.,~, _ laic -__~./ im! ~ WfIGUAt ,re of my serofces~ t Ji^eC! ~mal vupport that the G: v ..ns. fiiYlii:r.r:nt. P~ACOPi ..,L rI Zfi,h:'_ ..: ~? F2ECOV~r7t pROGRAi~f 4E .... _. ~ aen.,: ~,u ~::~t^ty?, I roCr Y. the `O7 'vwr?G lrpUri rn bU: PC.. Gui` :ut.r, ;i~cr ~•~ •~ ~•JUh N Hours Per+otl 1'iur aticr+ ~.. u..L~J^ <Wne V, ryon tn~ Cq or hl_n.hs, N' h:,- ru ..~,i' 'zte o;r;] far tim~'ar pos. i!on5 pals Dr tnr C. tr. th; .. .. ,+ .r <.e: v.... .~:ir i,. :ppr~~xrmatvtr: ',,~~. ..~~: -___.~_ Time : fVnouni '?n' ,. ~nr:.':r ,e:n~^,` Hy,~ tn3 dal u7 of m7 SerulCeS~ I 1ire~: • ., .,. ..-_ .• c°~:.. the minimal tuPPor; that tGe C; t, .. ,.f ....-o~ r ,i ti. ;p J; ?i' fir .~anizati GO£. ry ams ,_.~ ~~._. ~rrd~ri Pe'.'js~ ~Pp' Ae ., ,:1 t~_er cf aac._r. :. •:.,, _..,- '.he fol lOWinq houfi .n iupport Of OuP vCUtb. Or a::at~ poa, ;on ~ Period 6uratiGr• ._._ ° O (We~Y/Mon th) (p of Flan ths, A+ thm :•~r.nwn~ rite o..~d c - vb,l :Je Of n6 6er y ~ C2 5hq,11 C :. lions paid by th• CI tY~ tot y( ir7 Pos, tii,n oai ar~~ ~-- ?~: lieu of dl re[r re ~m:.vr .. +het Gre 3e monies .i.,,.: g;,,es tc norrnr v. ,.t., ~, c~tr -. kJdr•=s 9i as ~ pare _--?~~~~9/__._.. Timm ~ Amounr .!ua of mY serui[es, t direr„ nin~at ¢upport that thF G „• ons. F~ri:e~i~i~t „ G T T I 2 Ent' S CiJST REGOtlER4' PROGP,At4 As !. ci t, zer. of Rancho Cu;. a.~no.^.yx, I wort. the 4otlowi nq hours ,n support n4 OuP vOVth. n~~~~er~~ . ~~ ~ , ~ ~ ' ,zation Pos. tior. ~uU~(au0 Jc6 - N Hour= Perietl (WeW./Mon tA) Duration (M of Mon thsi P' the cur~nnt rite pa,d for simefar peal tlons paid OY tM City, the ::,i.~n of mr senn re ShOUId to appr ax imatel Y: Gti Pos, tin :al ar --_ >. Time >< fVllount l,eu of ~, rec~ rk ,mt.~,r ,e:nen! for the value o4 my services, ! direct ~ha~ t:.e?a aonilE ~~+ ~,esG '.~ offset the minimal tuPPort that the C. tv qt :rev tc non-nrot,t ;~c~tP ;ports orywni2atiuns. Nar.,v .,c~~~~u.i~. L ,.:, r ~. _......_1L: /sue-1~~-- i i 1 i ._ : r I <E'_t-.: ' ~ :.~ ~~~>T f2ECOtiJERt' PROGRFIY•f QE •. i~t~]pn G: Jan._r '.J_Yltna,~~• ( 4rOrY, tpe ~O}1JVA1 nr~ hours in iUPPOrt '~f CNr .. i ~ / N ~V /liar J ~ ~~'~ ~.~.~.,.~~'sei~c. 1.~•~=,;~ur. ~•Icb - q Hours Perletl Iiuratior ~j~M'~'bt~b (We W./Mon *.q) (q of Mnn tr.sr p` !r,r- -vr~•r~• rice o.id fir ci2rlar post tionc Paid br He Ci tr', tht ._ _. ;t .~~. aFry~.. _._.:1~ is .~ppr.:ximat¢7y: 3 _-5rt~.n :,, ,,. -..~_^-, Time ~ prtlount ' .~ 7::•ee` ...':r _e:n~n` rur tt+r value of m'r sera ~tesr I diract • - ~ -,~•ia> _ .::.. .- •.ar_c•t the minimal ¢uPporc that khe Gc; ., ,. rc ~_;~-nru:'t ._•_~P ~sp.r r.; cr ganization=. G/~7i~iiti•~M, P6ORCOPY Gi >-I <<-r.t' 3 ~ .' ~ _'.~GR"1' PROGF2At1 Aa • ci t, cer. c? Ran<r ;~ L., ._:~,, ;h~ fol lowing hour, ,., ;upper! of our '~out1:. S ~ Q9,~ IU~O ~ ~iycov , ~7r an~zatio Y?n5. ±; on ---- ~ Y. Perietl Duraticr ,.N (Werk/Mon th) (M of hlon;hsi Ar Me cvr~ent rite Oa:tl .., . b.l :Je Gf n;r SQryiCr ~.:..t i.^. .. :ons paid br Mt City, tht Cf r7 Pos. til.n Sal ar :.._-.. ?•, )fry of tl; r¢cr ..~mG~:r _..~ that t;:eze monirc Ld ~le;,, g~~~es tc n.;n-nr vt~t ;c;; tr ... `ime ~ Amount .:~~ of my seruites~ 1 dirrr~ -, ~a;al support that the C: t; „ns. AJdrrsr ___,- 97.3 / ... _OE._~Lt-~ ~• ~_ JdtC ~._ r~ / /.y 1--a~. ._..__. i 1 i ~~ CITI<Et+t'S G06' RECOVER"Y PROGP.Atd A: +, ci t: zer of Rancrn Cu. amc.^.ya„ 1 ~rorK the fol!owinq hours .n support of cur yea S... ~~ ~, zaxic/i PoS: t: nn Jcb - N Hours Period ~~ . Duraicn CN of Mon thsi t+` tike r,r~~ant rate oa,d for iim~lar pos. lions paid br the Ci tr, the -.i::e of n,• eery ic: sh arlC Le appraXimatvlY: C~*> Fos~ti,~n ~Sflar+~~ lime ~ Amount t,nv cf nirecr r«:mbor aMal?^* For the value of my servi[es~ J direct ~'~ar :~~r ;o n.~nie> ~. ;.,,;; ~.:, o;ts«t She minimal RopPort that She Ci t>• g~.a •: rc n.:n-rror~t ;c~tn ~pcr tc- or •3anizetion~. i r, PooACOAv CITI2 Eh7 S ,~ ,' Aa a i i f r zen cr Ran.rn pu;. a-.:^~ of our youth. At the tvr~snt r.a to pard 4^.^ . u alve Jf mr slrvic! sh ~~le .: City Posi lion Sal ar. ~~ !n 1ilu of tirrect ra~mtur an:n.~ that tie 3! monil:. be ul2i. 1, gruel to non-prut~t ~co th ^-p:r Name red ~7_'ti~~,q,~ Fddre9a __~/ 3 ~ 4~ Uate •r_ f~ ~~_.._. ~: r'r the following hours in support ~) ~ ~t4D ~.. Plriotl Dura ion (WeeK/Mon th) (M of Mon ths> ~~taona paid by the CI ly, the .`. y: Tuna ~ Wnoun! +.i up of my serviCts~ I direct +nimal support that the City -.. on s. ~`c,•,°4.~~~_ Ci T12Et4' g CO~r RECOVERY PROORANI As a ci l~z•n of Rancho Cu, a.•nor•q:., i worK tM fel laMinq hours in support of:0ur youth. zati -os ion Jcn - s urs Ptrlod Duration ,4jt„-;v~ (Wek/Menth) (N o4 Mcm ths) At tht eurr•nt rate paid for s+",~~•: pOSi lions pale br tn• Cl ty, tM value of mr sarvica shouts be ~F.y~ :: ~maelyt Ci tr Position Sal arr ~--~~! Timt • Amount i~ I U u of direct re imbursem=r. '~ a +ai w of my services, I direct Mat lhesa monias 6e uaed !o oe~ ~ =. minimal fupport tha! the [i ty gives to non-profit youth apcr?~ _ ~:ations. Name ~~°J:~CS.~Y_ ._.._..__. Address 775 Q /)/1~~>~~~J Date _ 11 f __ -~_~ CITIZEN'S COST RECCxIERY rROORAt•! As a eltiten of Rancho Cu: amonye., ? ~.ork tM follawinq hours in Cupp Ors o4 .our youth. 0 ni:a io Position Jen - r ~-lours Period Duration ~~~ <Mbek/Men th> (N of Mon ths> At the current rate paid for e~m,?.; pos;ti pie paid 6Y the Cl ty, the value of mr service should t:e ar.~~::~TStelyi City Position Salary ~~-~~- Time a Amoun! I~ li w of direct reimbursemen" - ua.l w of my teruieesr I direct that these monies be uses :u os. ~- minimal wpport that the Citr glues !~ non-prptit youtR Spcrtc rations. Name Rddress -~(,Q,(.J ,~r Date ~~ CITI2 EIV'8 COST. REGOtlE RY rROGRAtA As • clt~:ar. of Rancho Cu~arc.^.ya, worK the folla+inq hours in support of: our youth. ' O anizatio Position Jcn - • flours ParieO Dora ion ,,iA ~•.L_ <We•k/Menth> <N of Months) A! the Curren! rate paitl for a~m•'-~: positions paie Or tM CItY, tM value of mY uruica should to apyr.,:~satety; Cite Position Salarr •~ Tlms ~ Amount I~ ti w of direct reimbvr some ~.` +al w of mY seruicesr I diraat that thou monies be vteo '~a o°• ~ m+nimal support that the City giuas to non-pr pfit route spcr '~~ = _ :atiun t. Name lll,(x,[l i w~_. __ Addrafs ~a ~n ~~/,(O~~UW~(.t~.L.L~ Date ~~~q/ _~_ CITIZEN'S COST RECO~IERY rROORAM Af a citizen of Rarrcno Cu:amanyz., work the following hours in support of .our youth. z»tion ~~~- -tours Perfect lhleak/hbn to 1 ~© i ~M of Months) A! the eurrme rat! paid for a~m•?•. pos•ti onf paid DY tM Gtr, the value df mr farvic• should be apy-~:: ~+.a tely: Citr Position Salarr --~~- Time ~ Amoun! I~ lieu of direct reimDurxemer.' gal w of my services, J direet that theta monies be used to o'• c minimal support that Me Citr glues tc nonprofit youtrt ap cr '.s c rations. Namf ~~j,y,7 .~aanenlr~.~ .._. _.~_ Rddreff _,y~.d L. ~ b~ __ __~_ Oate I ! •___ ~._~ CITIZEN'S C05T REC 4tlERY PROGRAM As a cit~z•n of Rancnc Cu ~;,.mer. ~~a., [ ~.ork the fotlowinp hours in support of our youth. a AX31 / ~j ~ .~I /j~gO r anization Position ear= 1ch _ e " Parioo Duration SWe•k/Month) CM of Months) At the current rate paid for e,~~'•: pos. lions paid by th• City, th• value of mr s~rvica ah ~Uin Gz ap ~~:: "r•>tei y: City Position Salary '~ Time ~ Amount ?•r lieu of direct reimbur se me^.• ~e.t u• of my seruie•s, I direct that these monies to u•ec to ns, ~ minimal support that the Lity gives to non-profit route sp.^r t•, rations. Name ~-Nw _ ._ Address ~ /,' /~'~'/n , ~~ Uate ~ tiJ /Y~~_~_. _ GITI2EN' S C05T RECOVERY rIiOG RfY4 Aa a cikiztn of Rancho Cu. arnor. ya, ~.o.^K the follawinq hours in support of our youth. _Q ~f.C71 ~ ~ ~/~tp0 Or anization Pp Q~~tJiM1o~n Jcb ~- bP!,odu rU= Ptriotl Dura ion W (WetK/MOnth) (N of Months) At Me Current raft paitl for f'^'~•~ pos~ti ohs paitl OY Mt Lityr the value of mr atruice ih ould be ap ~r :: :r,: felt': City Position Sal arr ~ Tlmt ~ Amoun ?n Iieu of direct reimbur acme r.` .clue of my seruiCtSr I direct that thew monits be used f - r.~nimal support that the [qtr gives to narrpro4it youth spcr f'_ _ ationa. Name ~~1 L'iY yya,. ._ _..~_ Uate _~1 g ~ __,_ ~73-~ikii. ~, ~R ~Fr$ CITIZEN'S CO&T RECOtIERY Ir'ROORAM Aa a clliz•n of Rancno Cu. «-na r.ya, ; o.ork tA• following hours in supp Ort o4: our youth. f 1 .QQ/h(! 1 ~~ ~ . '~~ ' Orq n~zation Poa~ti 6fi Jcp ~- s yours Period Duraion i~i~~A/~ tWeek/MOnth> (M of MonthsY At the current rate paid for E~m•'•: pos. lidos paitl EY the Clty, th• value of mr sarvice ihouto ba ar.;•.: •nateiy: City Position Salarr ~ ~~ Time ~ Amount In lieu o4 direct rcimG,r ;emFn'• ~a.}ue of my seruites, 1 direct that <hes~ maniac be vsea !~:. o-• ~ m~nimat Cupport tha! the Citr gives tC norrprafit yeu tf! Sp Cr !c _ -ati on s. Namf r~ B n~._ Address ~JOt%~.___ Date ~( y}if~'.~~~. ~ it~d'Id1 tit ~. r As a c i t~?er. cf aan,,r o 'J V'--.~ of Our yOV tl+. '~:ER1' PROGRAh1 . •,~ the following hoofs .n support '~ ~ Lt / W + i ?o : a n OOrgan +, t Fns~t~un .. .. = PerieC Durat on ~~I~~•. .J.^-~ (WeaY./Montn) (M o4 Mon ths+ A! the tar^ent rate Paid f^.' valve 74 mr 4Qr4 n:~ ih•~~Il.'. :. -~!+nns paid hY the Cl tr', the ;'Y: Ci!~ Pos+tii.n gal ar ~~_--~ ?•t lioy of tli recr re~mC~v ,e~,~., chat C+B 3P mOniP> ~` •~f?Q `. gi yes cc nun-nro!rt ;~cn try ~.. 'ime ~ Amount „ue o4 mY seryi[es, t direct •rn;mal auDPort that the C~iv •~Vn~• rmm ~eder.SVn Name ,_,J +-~ 'vale ~/~~/~~~~~_~~. r„ . -"~R~~" P'ROGRAt-1 4s • c i t :Zen of 4an.:; .-. of our vcuth, ~ _„-"• ~ 'he follaui nq hours In wppcrt I~~~,'~ an: zaH n Po=., t: on AI Lhe tVrry:lt rate Od:~~ *r v>.l ue of m> ~en~icrt ,r. ,;.,1-~._ r mat k.~ ~~ - .~ ~_~ ~'~ ~ - Periotl Duration (Weak/Monlh) (M of tlcn ths, Cr t7 Pos: ti i,n 5a; a,, ~~-~-~ ?•: lieu of of tech ra ~mt•~r ,.,", 'hat these Toni<, `vr u~e•.: 9~~~es tc nan-nrW ~t ;'c;; tr. ., Name ~ddrwss 59 ;,ate __~i /~~9 - t~nns paid by !ne C7 tY, tht r: - Tlme ~ Amount !ue of my seru ices 1 direct •aimal zupport that the G t~; on_. ~ ~•~,- '~~~~~~~ PCs%GBP~ C_ITI2En1' S rt7 ~a- ,-:~.JVHRY PROGRAM As a cite ze r. cf RanCri6 Cu~amrr .~,r'r. !Ae felloWinq hours in support of our SOU t;,. ganizat~on Position Jor ~ ,., Plriod Duration (WleY,/Mon th) (N of Mon thsi At the [urgent rate paid f^r s value of mY se n~i ce sh oufa c. , ~~ti uns pall by the Clty, M! +'.•. Y: tY Position Satarr S~i tieu of direct re~mtur sem=- !hat the9e monies Ge ue?d !.. g~ues tc nun-pr otlt ~cutn ~. p,:; m! Amount .alu! of my seruicesr I direct -animal tupport that the Ci t>• .~un3. Nam!¢~~ ~___ i ~` Address S6-Sf~ ~ i~a"'t~[/rJ~S~ '~ L ~~' Date ___ /~ ~ !~. .. _. _ ..._ A CITI2FJN'S C05T RECOVERY PROGRAM Asa citizen of R•ncno Cu ama•y a, i ~.ork tM 4ellowinq hours in support of: our youth. Or ani z.ation osition Jco - ~ fours periotl Duration 1.1 7 ~ <Wetk/Montn) (M of Months) At tht current rate paid for e~m~'•: pos~tfons paitl tey the Cl ty, the value of mr •e rvice sh oulo bt ~Fi^:: ~aaelY: Ci ty Position $al arr ~~ Tlme ~ Amount I~ Iieu of Direct reimCuraeme !.` ~alu1 of my services, J direct that these monies Ge alto 'o o-• ~ ~ m;nimat tupport that the Citr g~ues to non-profit You to spcr 'c - ~: ati Jns. Name~~~L1.~/~ _._ Address U/! ~a u~-~ _~,.. .,,_._.~ Date !J /7 < / _, ~__„ CITIZEN'S Cp~.T IzECO~IERY PROGRAM As a cit~r•n of Raneno Cu,:,rncy>., ; o.ark the 4ellavinq hours in support of our yOVLn. ~ ~~~ ~~ ~5D ~ + ~ ~ . ' Or an iration Posi on Jcb - p fours P•riotl Dur a ion ~^~„~,~;,~ (We•K/Mon th) <N of Hontns> At the eurr•nt rate paid for t~m~!-~ pos~ti ons paitl by th• City, tM value of my serui a should to- a{5~:. ~r.aely; City Pos~ti un Salarr Tim. ~ Amount !h lieu of tl~rect reimtur ;emer.` r +at ue of my seruieesr J dir•Ct that the z• monies Ge used :o o:, ~ ~ m~nimat support tha4 tfre Litr gees to non-profit auto sport. :ationz. Nam. {/q~ V ~A Iyal,.[16Q,~_ _._ _.~ GITIZEt+1'S CiJ?3"- .~'O~JERY PROGRAM As a ci t+zen of Ram.no Cu: a'n^r of our vovtt+, ~~ ~l1CUin~.v Re~~ ~c e fA,, ~o _. Urgan+zation Pol+Y~on ~... .~r"r. the following hours in support a~ ~- ~~~ ~~r= Period Duration (Werk/Mon th) <M of Man thsi At the [accent rate paid 4nr 5 value of mr service ihoulc i;. City Pos+fion Sslarr _~ >+tioni paid by the City, M r ,'.al y: Tiihe ~ ATOYnt ?^ lieu of direct re+mbur se:n.- .+r,l ue of my services, t direct that the3e monies. Le uy2i. `. .. n~nimai support that Me City gives to nun-nryfit ~cu tr sp-% ~atian!. I G I "i' I Frit ' S r.4<,:T REGOUE RI' PROGRAM{ Ai r ci t. zer• cf Ran~n,-, Cu~a.TC.^.y~„ t o,ar6 the tot owing hours ;n support of our CCU r.:,. ~Pr'd'~ ~ Asst God. ~.~ iG~ • ~ ~n,~o . izatic pne, t;vn Jeb - M Hours Period Duration CWeeY,/Mon th> CM Of Manthsr P' the :accent rste pa,d fnr aimr?ar pos; lions paid by the City, thr a.t ::e ~f e,r slrv~co ;ho,rl:] to appr nx,mately: Cl riri ?os, ti on a larr >, Tfine ~ Amount ?~: ',au of or recr re rmCor some r.r fnr the aal up of my services, t direct •her ;;,ex+ c,gnies L' •isz•, !:: o'r ,.et the minimal 9uPPort that khe C: ty o~:~e_ re OJrrnrr.,t<;~cu tr spec t=_ ar ganization _. NMiK { ILM ~~l~CGr_:..~~ff.. {~ ~-J:lrwcy (((_~j~~~JJ W~y~ _~ C ~, 1,J ~ i7p9 C f ~- ~ ~ ~ ~~ v.. r~. ti CITIZEN'S COfi~T RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rsncno Cu.:.-nonyt, ; ~wrk the follawfnp hours in support of: our youth. Or anization Position Jcn - ~ :faur= Period Duration .p,-h_,.r_ lWeaK/MOntb> (M of Months) At the torrent rale paid for t~m~'-~ pos. lions paid by !A• City, the value of mr serviu ihoula ce a¢;-;: -+.a'.e7y: City Position Salary - ~~ Time ~ Amount to li w of direct reimbur ;em=r,` ~ +alu• of my seruiCesr I direct that these monies be usrd '-~ o°• ~ minimal support tha! the City gives to non-profit youtR spcr >. c _ :anon s. Name LjJ.~2 _ Address ~~ J S~ ~J~__v`-':. Dace Il J 4/ CiT22EN'3 CO&T REG9tJERY PROGRAM At a citizen o4 Rancr,a CY ~:u'nCr.ya, ; worK the 4ollowinq hours in support of our youth. 0 an~zation Position tor. - a -!ours Period Duration (Week/Month) <N o4 Months) qt Me current rate paid 4or Fpm " •~ p^.a~tiona paid DY the G ty, the value of my service should to ?p;r:: +,a eiya City Position $alarr ~_~~~~~~~ Time + l+mount ?~ lieu of direct reimbur seme•.` +ai w o4 my services, 1 direct that the so man iat Ge uoed b:+ o=~ m+nimal support that the City q~ues to non-pr u4it you to spcr !•. - :rations. Name I,S,t'1!d `~~.! .. Rddrest 1 ~/~__ ~~f1st~( 1~~,J~~F~Na'^"' bate _ !! 71 _ (J ____._ ,~ G IT72Eh1'S COST F2ECO~JERY -ROt3RAM Af a cltrzen of Rancho Cu~amar.y a., [ .•.ork Lhe foliavi np hours in support of: our youth. T.ee~ ~.~ llho, ~~x-aa , Or nization Posr ron Jch - >< '~aure Perietl Duration .n_0__i. SWeaK/tlen th> CN of Months) At the current rate paid for s~m~'~. •~ p^.3~ti ohs paid DY M e City, the value of mr servi[• should to a{~•:: rr,aelY: City Posi lion Sal arv -. ..~~ Time ~ Amount 1~ Iieu of direct re~mtur sem=n` _ ,aiut of my seruiCes, I direct that these monies to uffO !o .=~ ~ minimal support that the City gives to non-pr9fit you trt spcr tc _ rations. Name / ~r _ _.i,_ Addreff IZtp~~ lU~At~ tdl ~`_^ Uate _~1~e._._..~__.___ ____._._ GiTI ~s=nf'S •. ". -~'4V£R4' PROGRAFt a+ a ci krzer. of Ran:rc ~~~~.:~~•.- .=~r'r !M rollawi nq hours in support of our vouttr. ,~ lT ~ /l/L!l J '~~7LB'd r 0. ar,rzaticn Poc.r {; on ~~s Period Duration ~~J SWerY,/Mon tA) CN of Mon ths7 At the current rate p+id f^~ va1JP D4 err 5Qr 41 CQ ir.OrrlC L Lions paid by the City, thr 'Y7 Ci tY Poor tin S41 ar -~~~-- ?•J li4v of tlr rect rermbur ;e:r~ f hat ihe3e m~~n ir4 Le asdd gives tc non-nr9t~t ;•cu k;• :, Name -7~7~- n~,.T Address __17,.~4~~LA1e~aorVT CIJCr-~11tOuC~4 Ccti~ Gate __lL-.L_`.4 ~. Tim! ~ AlflOUn{ .a}ue of my services t direct ^rnimat Support that khe Crc>• i:l one. CT _ 4/73v GITIZEN'5 Cp~T RECpVERY rROORAM As • citrtrr, of Rancno Cu: anor.ya, work the iollowinq flours in support of: our south. Or anrzation Pofitron Jcc - ~ !ours Pfriod Duration n~ (WerK/hbnth) (M of Mon th si Af the currrnt rale paid for l~m~:.: pos~ti ons paitl by tAr U tY, tM value tlf mr srrvica should to ap ~•.: ap;ety. Ci it Position Salarr ~ Tlmr ~ Amount I•r liru of tlrrect reimbur semec° a;+.l ua o4 mr feruiCrsr S diratt that these moniaf be vfeo !a c=• ~ r+nimal support that the Citr gruel tc non-prafit youth spcrt~_ - _ rations. Namr f~~ x-~ nA1.~LU _ ._ .....~.. gddrefs ~~ r~y~•{t-! ~(l~ oats ,~ Il /~ 9 ,-~_ C ZTZZEN"5 C05? RECOVERY Ri~06RPi~t As a cit+z•o 04 Rancho Cu.:.,tor.yz, work the fotiawinq hours in support 04; Wr youth. rte" ~,~D ,~- ~~, +zati on Pos+ L on Jch ~ b !our= Periad Duration ~",.,,^ (W•ek/MOn th) (M of Mon tb s) qi the current ratt paid for R~T.•?-~ pos,tiona paid pr tM G ty, the value of mr Rtrvice snauld to .n,~~..-s,a tefy: Citr Position Sal arv -~-~~~-- Tim• r Amount In lieu o4 direct reimbur neme •.` +ai w of my services, I direct that chest monies be uttd '~ o:. ~ ~. m+nimal Rapport that the C+tr 9tV•G tc norprvfit you to spcr>.c _ rat. on s. Rddrett ~~/y ~ ~- Uate ~~ ~ __ .._.__.~ „ CITi2ElV'S COST RECOVERY rROORAM As • ciLztu of Rancr,o Cu: ~.ra:ya, ~.ork Me following hours in support of: our youth. Orq nization Position Jcn - • ^:ours Ptried Duration ,y,~,~,~ CWetK/Menth> CN of Months> A! the current rats paid for z'^.;'°•~ pos, ti onf paid by !M C{ty, Me value of mr uroict fhould bt n(.>• .: •oael y7 City Position Salary ~ Timt • Amours! i~ litu o4 direct rtimtur seine r,` ~ ~a.lut o4 my seruieesr 1 direct f hat thest moniee br ~»ed to o`~ minimal support that the [qty g:~ts to non-profit you tR sp cr '± _ cations. Name 11 n~~i m--''-- - -- AddyHf _. ~_ [1;10 ~ 1 / ___~_ CITIZEN'S CC)„~.T. RECOVERY ~R06RAM As a citizen of Rancho Cu::.~nc.ye„ work the follgyinq hours in support of your youth. ization/ ~Apos.i, iron ~~''~J ~>vv ~, - >< '-!our= Prriotl ttJeek/Fbn to ) .~l~ , CN of Months> Ai the Current rate paid for a•m~~•: pos~tioM paid hY M• CItY. the u aloe ~i mr service ihovid tr ?p i':: T,s tety; L+*.r Pose ti on Salarr ~ ~~ Tlmr ~ Amount t~ lieu of tlrT ect reimbur same r.` .a.l u• of my seruites~ I direct that these monira be used '<, c=~ ~ arnimal tupport that the Gtr gives tC non-profit yeuto sp:r!i~. r,-, Cations. Name Op• Address 70 ~~,_~ oate II ~ 9 ~__' G I7I2EJV'S COST RECOVERY PROdRAM As i ct4rz•r, of Rancno Cu::.rocr.ya, t .~.orR the f•pTTavinp hours in support o4_pur yOVth- l/~I>v ~~/~. ~~. Or anrzation Pvsrtrvn Jct ~- p !o.:rs PerrOd OVriti On ~J{J,p~,~,t tWe•k/Month> (M of Monthsl A! the [unrest r;,ta paid for F'^•!•: po s, ti ons piid D,v !h• C7 tY~ the vaTUe of mr strvica shouts ke 3p;,• xa ety; Ci rr Position Salary ....-..._..-' Time ~ Amount T~ tiev of direct raimturstmec'~ +alu• of my aeruites~ J 4iratt that thrsv manias be used 'J ~=• ~ ~ n,nimat support that the G ty grimes t0 non-profit youtn epCr?;. - )atruns. Nune !.U(,1.1'i(~r~dy/ }(1JY//N~~ 01~rj)' ~ _ Address ~~5 / / 1tY4',G(.`~.I{X/'L/ ,~__..... Uate ,~ << ~ ~ ~,_~ CZ rIc _Y•:"S :.f ti OJT RECQVERY PRQGRAt4 Q4 a Gj TI ZEP ~ 73n.:rC ~'U:_wT.^. ^. ~ya~ ( LIO^Y tt1? 1011JWIn^ tlOllri i.'t bUPPGri '. GUi '; ^V th. p'~zat~cn ~<: t: on Jch - N Hou rs PerioG DuraTior O~.iOco~ (WeeY..'Mon th) (q of Mnn;hs~ a= thv .^. •ar:•mn• rice uaid f^r aims'. a positions pain by t1e City, T.he ,. .. ~f cr -.erv,.,. e~. o•~I~ r appr ~x imptei Y: ,,, .; ~~<~ ~n ;al ar-~~ -~ :• Time ~ Amoun ',r•u .:' 7i~ + ~. ~mtru :a:n~n* for the va.l uP of mr >eroices• t direct • ~ .~•e-::~ :.;,.~. _ _. .... of. set the minimal suPPorc that the f. t; . .. rc ..~~. -..rv+. • ~ corr. ,. t!, or ganizatian _. - -1~~ '~•h~ Seju~Z n,a~r,E /I /y 9 / c t'r I a En, ~ _ ~ _ -- ~ :_ ". _ii)E Rl' PROGlxsir-i At a [itrxen cf Ranc r.c C.. _.,, ~.- :rw the following houfS in .upp ort of our goer tt~. 9, qa.^• + z a t i cn p~n'n/~[!O-+n.t~.r o/r• ~~ f~ - ~~ , _ Period Duraticr <Wrrp,/MOnth) (M of hlon th y, At the car~ent rate oa+d 4r.^ ~alJe 3f mr 4rn/i ~.e 3,. n•rl~ :, City Poa+ti on ~slar;.'. __ lions pall by th! CItY~ !hr ~Y: Time ~ Amouai [~~ lieu of drrec+~ ~e+munr :a~° ±,I UP of mY SeroiCrSr t direct chat the sa mon ics `~+ ae r'C ~ :'nimal support that tf-,P C. ;; e:'~es tc non^nrw ~ t ;-c~ tr ... '' oo~. ®on Gbve.R hddfr5s _ -Al~~___~J4c~ ~ `~~ .-- 'vate _._ it .7~.._V... -. ..~ v• Aa a citizen G5 ?anc; ,: Cu._,a~~^ n4 our vryuth. the 4oi lowing hours .n support __ ~~ /~ . ~/n~v , Or anizatio Pos~tton ... Peridtl Duration C__/~„ / CWeeY./Mon th) Cp of Months) At the current rite paid '.. ~'~ona paid by tM Cl ty, the r' City Posi firm Sal ar:-._-~~~~ S•i tieu o4 di rec~ ra•mLnr ,=:a~~ 'hat t1e38 6Nnie5 ~.~ aed~.: `. gi oes tc non-pr Ut, t,. yc~tr c, ., Name ~rtJ`L ~_'Sla.n!~a~Q f.ddraey ~L 1f~h?rI!.,.~lai I(t'1 Z R c . cu an ~~ rim! ~ Ambunt ua 04 my seruites~ I direct n~mal support that the r.i c, on=_. vat ^ . _.~. ~ t/~-- C i >• I ~ f.=_t~d ' S C: ~.ST K'ECQtJERY PR OGRAi•{ 4e <: !~Sen cr 7ao._`-~ Cu~a'nC'.y2., ! worK tAe -ol ': pwi ng hears ~^ support 04 OJf '+9Vti~. I ~~~T _ a?.~D /vb + .~ ins 0 y,. r.at :' i t;on Jch. ~- tf HoHOUrs Per:ed fiuratien (We~K/Mon M) CM of Mon th s+ H' t:yr- r. ar:.„~~~ rate Pa;d for t~^!+'ar oei tion6 p pard trr the City, thr -_. .. ,f ni• 4¢ryi::I ihpul! tz ~ppr.:x:mately: "r?o s: t i ~..n 531 ~P -"--._ ,. Time +r Amoun •~ .~{ '~"rc' , mb~~ir _+;n~n~ !r~~~ the ualu¢ of m7 sera: tes, 1 di tact ..^-" .-~~.,I,ic, '_ ~,a_~; '_• c'r ~.et th¢ min:mat ¢uPPorc that tha C, tr .. . ... rr n.n-nru: ~! ~ ca rr• ~;p _; r ,r •~anization s. ~/ 7 CITI2EtV'S COS? RECOtIERY ~ROORAM As a citizen of Rancho Cu. amr..ya, wor'r. th• follawihq hoots in support of: our youth. Or nization Pos~t~on Jon - +~ yours Pfriotl aura ion n~`[0-p~„', CWsek/MOn th> CN of Months) At the cunrent rate paid for t~m~r; .:~ pos,tlon• Daid Dr th• City, the value o4 mr sarvic• ah ouid t¢ ar.~r :: T.a¢ly; Ci*.r Position Sat arr -~~-~~~~ Time ~ Amount !~ lieu of tlirect reimCur ;eme ~.` +a.1 ua of my serui~es~ 1 direct that Chess manies be used 'c. r•~ ~ ~ minimal tupport that the City gives to non-prpfit youtR sp cr is :atipn5. Namf ~ ~ _ ._ _.~._ Addr e f s ~ 1 Date p / 9i _ _____r_ __, C_I->•IZEN'S ~-. :.~ -v'. JtJHR4' PROGRAf-1 As a citizen of Ram_Y. ~. Low:„-er~ ....~ the fotlawinq hours In support pf our roV th. d gan~zati ~:on ~._ ~ ^:. ~~= Period Duration '~ (Week/MOnth> (N of Mon Lhsi A{ the eurront rate paid io^ , value of mr service ;hon 1.^. :.. -~tions paid DY tM Citr, the ::Y7 Ci !'r Posr tiun 5alar: rlme ~ Amount !~r lieu of direct r.;~mt:~ir .e~.rv~~ :alu4 04 my sere ites~ I direct that these monies. t.e uei:: ~ ,~nimat Aupport that the Gty gives tc nan-nrut~t ;•ev to ~_, r ;ions. ream. .,?G~is ~1+. L/el~a f l` y s Hddress / /~.3a!~ S.._!.1L~1.~lf ~/-~ • p G RF,t'1 -r f2EGp`)ERti ?~ S• Gi1~-' ~In9 OYU'JrS .n Ufa .°i f r iCr'J, `1_ c` a.,... of ' -/~ //"~ r pule -~~~~r~/ !l~ Petted ~p of Mon ttr s'~ y/~~ 7~~ ~-_.~//Yr~',r~".~urs tWPeY/Month) 1~_at, on Li tr', thx the <i mttar P°s•~ions RjiO °Y . rate paid 4n:Le_3f Pr.ax imaetYi f.he car, :•.p a. ]•!1 ~. F , e: ~. u_ J _~ i Time 31 a'~ ~_-~ "t .n ~` t ~.r! '~.~" difeG .• Lh• valua °f m RP°f to that, ttre Ct Lr „ c' f.; .mt:yr ar:fKfyF rf c't ~¢zat^un`i. t ' or 9 ' °'' of ~,.>!'~ i e 5 ~: ~.' ~F'~. •zR~r t•' .. J-"jam' ~ ~ ~/,'1'~!/1,.~'/-~ J~~ _~•ir„ss _. ~~,~1~~ .__.--- --- GI ~I2Et••t 5 !:tQ:3' REGOUERI" PROGRAI4 An a, cif, :en v 4anc;,n Cu~J.TO^.y3., ! worA Me rol toy~i ng hours In suppo: f 1f ouP vny tl~. 9 u~.~+•. zaH cn ~ Poai t: un Jcb - M Hour= Per+od bur>tien p,. ~l_. ., (WeeY./MOn th) (q of Hanins+ a' t+~ie -•rrrznf rite pa;d fDr him+l ar pos. lions pain by the Cl ty, the •. .•.' Df nrr sen~.,:~ shp,il.^. i:a appr•7x+mptety: G~•: !'os~t;i.n'~at ar~~~~~ Tlme ~ Amount •,>~_ cf eirec` r«.: n,bnr semrnt For the +al ue o4 mY seruiees, I direr: .r,;,. ~:,e ;,, ,-,.p~~,ics' "~a.; .: o't set the minimal auPPorc that the Cyr: q' .r, rc n.f!-nr J!'~t 1•; G•+tD ~p Cr tr: cr ~J,ni latiun5. C I'f I Z F_r•7 ~ S .._ qs a C i ! i ±en p= Rams; c tu. ;.; ~~;ri n4 ouf rout;,. the foltaai nq hours in support O. 9anizatio Pnsi ton Jc Period Duration ry„~,, ,~ CWeW./Monthl CM of Monthsi A! the current rite paid f^^ . -aloe of mr serv~ra ;..:~~il: c. City Position Salar- r•~ liau of tlirect ro~mbnr ,~:r~~ that thew nanias be us?•:: '. g, ufs tc nofrnru! i t )'c0 to ^. .~ a Name ~ ~ Address X79 ~.sa~.t'.._G~ _. .'~~~~:ERY PROGRAFI -~,~ons paid br the City, the y: ime Amount ,iue of my seruiees, t direct ~nimat support that the City ions. 'vats ~_~'~~ C:2-('I c='ht'S ~':7:iT REGOt/ER4' P~tOGRFaI.4 qs ,. _i t: Zen c° van<r.c ru~iTO.^.y>.. I wor'r, the Foltuwi pq hours In ;uPpor+ ~~f Our vou', i.. 0•yen ~. zaticj: ~ ?ne: t;or. •Icb - M Hour= Period Duration ~ (WeeY./MOn th> CM of Mon ths~ P' the rir.•.•n• rite paid for eimi'ar posi tioas paid r'Y the CI tY, the ..!oe ~f ,.,. <,Fry.:.z ar:::rl~ tz appr•_xrmat¢1y: C~~: Fos: ,i n :a; ar .~ .. Time ~ anount ':PO of ^.irec •~ r«:mG~r ;omen! for the value of m'r serui Cebr i direct cnev~ -•;,.:ic ~ •~.+~; ~;; ef.set the mf nimal BuPpart chat the Gt>• _. ,; rc narrn^or~t~~.~cu tr• ~sFor t_ cr ganizations. r,r ar,r ~~:N ~s~ r :' i 1 CITIZEN'S GOS` RECQVERY PR~ORAM qa a cit. z•n of Rancno Cu:ane r.yr. [ v.ork the following flours in support of: our youth. .S/ ~ . ~~ /v~~ pr nization position Jeb - e'!o!ours Period Duration tWrek/MOnth) tM of Months> At the current rate paid for t~m~'. •; pos~ti ors DaiO by Me City, the valve of mY service should to ar.yr ;: *.. tetY: City Posi ti ~n Salary ~~ ~ Time ~ Amount So lieu of Direct reimturyeme r.` +alu• of my servic•s~ I direct that three moni•p be aced 'c, o'• ~ n~nimat support that the Lice g~ues to non-prutit /ou to spcr t ~ rat~ona. Name Address ~~(~~~~ '~ i 1 CITIZEN'S COST REGC?V ERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancno Cuc arenga~ I worK the 4e1lawinq hours in support of our youth. 1 ~~ R ~ /UW ' '' ~' ~ ization Posit,on, /`UA"i"~y_.`~_w_.,_~ Job - M Hours Periotl (Wetk/Month> Duration (M of MonthsS At the torrent rate paid for similar posi tl ont paitl by tM Clty, the value of mr service lhoultl be approximately: City Position Salary x Time ~ Mhount I•i lieu of direct reimbur semenf for the valve of my seruites~ I direct that these monies be used tv ofl set the minimal support that the City gives !e nun-pr ufit youth sp crts or ganizations. Name ~~~~'I,'•~~',tL~l~f/ ,I,,In ~.~ Rddress ~~~ W~ ~~~~' (M/W'K~ Date __ II ~+f 9/ CI TIZEhs'S Cgz3'F' RECOVERY PROGRAI-1 Ae +. :: tizen ci Ram_r:e ~'u..vmcr.ye., 2 wor'Y. the ?ol?owing hours ~.. >upport •lE GUf '+OV tir. at' ~ Pos~t~un ,;cb - X Heurs Psriod Duration ~~ ~) ~ ~' QpL~(t(jI)g (WeeY/Month) (M of Mcn ths> P' the Cvr,. :+n! rite paid for !imrlar posi tiuns paid by the City, tha E.iue cf m- tl4 n11~-~ ~;: ai 1.^. Cz appr oxrmately: C~r~ ?os~ti~.n Sa; ar >. Tlme . Amount 'iav of .~i recr r«~mtnr se:n~n` For the udl up of my seruieesr I di re[t ar :~~e .e -~o!~~ia_ ,~a, :~ ..• pitet the minimai 8upporc that the Ci t>• _ .,: ~c nan-pruf~~t~;+c: kr spar= er•~a,nizations. h acre _1~ / (/ /`~~.~~-. /~~1'_/_ =J:;r' o eb _.. 1~~7 r SQl?t ClZI:711Y3.0~ny... ~Q ~~70~ ='. --~/` ~_. ~. . C 17SZF_ra'S !~._._ ,~;.;1VER4' PROGRAI.1 As a ci ti zer. of Rar. ;;rc Cu: amc: ~~:r'r. the fol?awinq hours .n support of OVr YOV tip. r gan~zati n Pos~t;on ~1c.~ u ~ ... = Ppri od Duf ati Gr tWeeY,/Mon th) <M of Months; At the current rite oa~d for c uA?Ve Of mY Sf rYlCf ih oJla ::. City Position ~a?ar _-.>, Lions paid by the Clty, the ,ct~?Y: ~~~ 7ime ~ Amount !~i lieu of direct re~mtur;e:n=r ~ .. aiua of my seruites, I direct That m e9P monies be ueec t. ,n~nimal support that the C.cY gives tc nuB-protit ~CatP p.:: -ati OnS. Name --~~~~~~/~_- t C I f I <Et~t ' S r~OST RECOVERY PROGRAM 4s a citizen c: Rancho Cu: amongn, 1 work the fotiowi ny hours in support of Gur ~'OV th. ~apG/lvYno+~ ,~SD/~ ~ '~ ~ , ~, ~...~ +J-y:+n+zatian Pn~it~on Jcb - N Hours Pariotl Duration (~-yt<ana/ (Wetk/Mon th) <M of Months) P' the c..rrnent rate paiu for fimr'. ar poa: lions paitl by Me Cl ty, Me =•a.ioe of m• se n~~r.t sho~rtb i:e appr GxrmatelY: Gi*'r pose tii.n Sal are ~ Timt ~ Mlount ?~, I~oq of tl~rech re~n+Dnr;emont For thr valua of my seruites, I direct •bat tree ,n ponies ~.~ aStG to oft>et the minimal support that the Ci tr q~.+es tc non-pro%.t ;.a,th 3pGrts or yanizations. =J!Jr•ss ~ /14/~ 6.I+t17Lt..FC ~.(~.ts~+A ~~.> t n _.. -.mil ~!.=L.___...~~. CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a cl4rxen o4 Rancr,o Cu.aarocye., ? ~wrK the following hours in support of: our yoath. Or anization Positron Jcb - b urs Prried Dar ati on (WelK/MOnth> (M of Months) At the current rate paid fer l~m~, •: Pos. ti ons pain Dy M ! Clty, Me value of mY alruic! fh outo to np,~~:. ~m a e1y: City Position Salarr Tlm! ~ Amount l~ lieu of tlirect reimGur3emec^ +a.}u• of my seruiUS+ I dirltt that theca monila to uslG '~ o°~ ~ ~. minimal tupport that the Citr gruel to narp ro4it yov tr sp cr is _ cations. Nam! /~~~/~~yy /y(~_I.(,~~NJ~(/Y(~ Address -16Ll~ / Ot~~L #~5~ Uate _ 11 ~~ 9~ ~_ CITI2Ety'S COST f2ECOt1ERY rROORfihil Asa clt~zen of Ran UFO Cu: amer.y_, ; work the followin of: our youth, y hours in support Q Zodi~ r~J~ ~ - ~/ino9 , r ani2ation Po JOh - s ,\O}_/.`.a~s'p_l„',',' =ours Period Duraion <Week/MontA> (M of Months) At Me current rate paid for F~m•;.; value of mr service ih oula L': nr.~~~, FO S'ti ons pai0 DY tM CI tY, the .. T~:'v1Y: City Position Salary -~--~ Tlme ~ Amount !~ liru of direct reimbur semen, '• that these monies be used to c=. - ` 'i'1 u• of mY seruiCesr I direct gives to non- rofit m'nimal suPP~rt thak the City F TOVth 3p Cr ;•; fatiunS. Name 'F/.~Q,W I,Q~p ~4-~-G-~ Address I,~A(p_~}per ~ _1/~ ,rL it /_ / Date _ !N 9 / l~_ Vl~(J_~0p~/[_jAt!~_~ CITI25N'S COST fYECC>•JHRY PROGRAM As a citiz>•n pf Ran u~o Cu: ampr:y;, t .~~orK M• fpllowinq hours in support of: our youth. Dr a ization Position Jch - a !ours Periotl Dvrati on n._,,,,~/ (Week/hbntA) (M of Months) At the current rate paid for e~m,'-~ pos. tlon• pall Dr the City, Me value of mY service ih oultl to :r ~~~~.; ~.a teiy: Litr Potiti nn Sal arr ~-~--~~-~ Tlme ~ Amoun4 I~ Iieu of direct reimbur :em~c' ~a.l ue of my serui[esr I direct that these moniec by used !~~ o°• ~ minimal tupp ort that the L~tr gives !C non-profit you tr spcr?_ ; _ rations. Name ~L_...~IJJ "'-_ .t"~_ .._.-.._~_ Addrefs ~'~ ~' ~ a~.Qf 1Jf_~ _~ vale _ 1 ~`f 9l _.~_. CTTIZ~l~.t'S ~. _ ' of our rou tt.. _ lA[tR~l/ _ l ~~ O. ganrzatic Ao-!t!cn ... AL the nrr~ent rate pa!d 4^,^ '~atue o4 r,!+ str rJira 3~.ar!.^. :. Ci t'r Position Sal ar ?~~, lieu of o!rect re!mb~~r ;ern ~-~ 'hat these monies ire v=?~.; gives tc non-prut~t ;~c.tr ^~ . .. the fottawinq hours ;n support Perietl Du~ti or (WeeY./Mon tA> CM of Mon ttrsi ,~t!ons paid 6Y tn• City, the Y7 `ime ~ frnount ~.i ire of my seruiees, 7 direct ~;imal support that the CVCy •Vn~• / ,.flA~ ,a Mime ~ /^'A'fJ f~ ~%C (/~" "V~ ~•~~ w hddrees _~i ~~~ J~ /°r~.'riGh •,9nQ ~/j, ..~ irate CC?~rI~'=71"5 CAST RECQVERl~ pROGRA(•f 4s ,, cif+ien cc 4am_no Cu: amor.ya., I o,orY. the roliewi ng hours ;n support n-ya:•.;7at'~r_n p^o., ~iun Jcb - q Heur P~~od 6uraFion SWeeY./Mon th) tq of Mon thsi F` tr+e nir~•rn! rzte Oa+d {or ^imrtar post ti ons paid OY tnt City, the 5,1 ~~~ ~{ n,~ ',4n1ir: ;ho~ild ce appr ox+matel Y: f,i+i?~.~s+:ii.n ~Sa; ai-r 71 me ~ Amouni ,n., o{ ^i:•ec ~' re ~mbnr ;emc^.` foi~ th• val u4 Of mY 5erv ices, [ direst ,;, .. .-,.,+tic5 _. ~,=dc, ~~ GftJat the minimal Gupport tha! the C+tr _. .;`rc non-nrut~t~•~~co tp =pcr is or ganizetions. r >~//• , GI (IZEnt•S r; Ids,>-^ RECOVERY PROGF2Fiid qc ,, ~; tl±. r. c% ?an.:r ~: Cu~a'nrny:., ! urork the rol towing hours .n support of GJP vqV tl.. _ V , ~~~Y/Hfti~,itl,l~ ~ / / / 9 ua:•~..at~an Posl t~on Jch - M Hours Periotl Dufaticn <WeeY,'MOnth> Cp o{ Man thsr r.• /he Clf~~r, ;~! rgte vald f^r siml+ar positions paitl oy the Ci tr, the .:.'~ ;f nl. -:f nl..:e s.. :•dIG Lr 3ppr':x lmatei Y: ~~: ^'as~tll.n Salar -~~~_~ >. 71 me ~ Amouni .. ,;{ .; ...rc~ ~m~nr _e:non* For' .~ _ rC ., ~i~-nr J!' f ~"C'. tr' 'S~Jf tS Or ~ , ~ ~~ the ux)ue of my serui Ces, I tli^ett t`:c minimal support that the C, cv gani zatiun=. jr ~• c; rs~.= of our vpu ih. - ~., ,cF21' PROGRAM{ • the fallowing hours .n suppc.! ~-i4taG'arst r.3 A3~f~ ~~ ~"~ .• / sobs -snaa.C'bv';~~~r~c.~~-~t,~- y ~pp ~rr~n~NXr+~ C/yin-r*p, elr.~ih gon~ + rxeQ . pr q'~ar; zat~~en PnF, ;;or ~ Period Dureticr /!/ (We!!,/Man tn) Cq of hlar.;nsr A* the Curren! rate oa;~l `:. , r 5.1 Je Jf n..r 5pr 4,.. 5,.:•r{,^. 'gone paid by the City, Y,hz ~: City P~sr tii.o Set ar-.. -___ Time ~ AmOUni (-, lien Of tlirec ~' re ~m~,:r _-~~ :~+! bf mY serv iCes+ 1 dirzr„ tP~t t:~e 3a mu+]ica ~+sr•.: -..mat auppbrc tnaL tt,e C, .~ g: yes ro non-nro:.~t~~.~c_tr .. ons-. n~ / / Nam! ~~~ ~QJ/~er/~,Q ~ml.~9jh~lir~ _ p hJdrees ~ ~ f(!L-`~!!~_56i~~/f+ JJ~~•/~/~ ~~. L I' GITI2 Eh!'S C~7?>" -.cCO~IERY PROGRAhI A: a citrze r. or Ran•_r:o Cu,.:,.~i -: ~~:r'/ the following hours in support Of pyr rOVth. Organizati on Posr Iron ~; a,~ ~---„ Period Dura ion (Week/Mon th) (M of Monthsi At the current rate paid fo^ value of nrr aervirt ;h ogle i;. .c•ti ons paid by the Clty, the v': y: City Position Sea arr !•i liau of drrect rrimLur se:n~~ that these monies be ut?c ',. . gi ue ,'. to non-profit youth ~a p.:: Time ~ Mlount ~.l ue of my seruitesr i direct ~~nimal tupport that the City •::ons. Name ~L .~ ... .~ Address _,~'o~v~~ ~~/IYt ~Y(<1, Date ~ C_TTI~Er•t'S t-: ~~s; "" -=-.t•.1ERY PROGRAFt A4 • ci t,i Zen ~: Ram.CO Gu ..:.:~•.^_• Of our ~OUth. P~ ~ Q~.i . --r.,~. „ ~, ~„ ' Organization ~ Position -.. .c r'r the foltowinq hours in support l~ 5~ ~- ,..: Period Darati on '~ (We•Y,/MOnth) (M of Mon thsi At the cur~snt rate pard far . value of mr se mice ;h oul~ ;;. Ci t•r Po4i ti ~n mil arr~ ~~~~ +~t10n4 gild t)y thf CI tYr Lh! s!Yf ~~ Timr ~ Amount r~r 11eu of tlirec~ ra~mtnr~, e:n~ that these movie; se acrd `. ~~ gives tc non-prot,t ~outC s. Namr ~lyS Se . ~_ ~A„ I' _ . Pn1rJrlay --V:.1.i! r r r'1~°' ~l ~~ ('. ~~,7ja ua to -~.! ~_. ~ 1991 . ~~,I up of my serui[esr I dirrct .,~nimat 4apport that the Crty :iun?. GITI2 Etv'S COST RECOUERI' PROGRAhI As a. ci ti zer cf Ran ~_n r. Gu~.:.menya, 1 ~.ork the fo?)awinq hpurs in support of our youth. y ` v~/ i' / , ization Posr ti on Jpb - k ours Periotl Duration (Wee Y./Mon th) CM of Mon thsY A. the tar^ant rate paid for sirnr?ar positions pain Dy the Citr, the v a.i ue of nrr se n.i re should to approximately: GY t•r Position Sa1ar~ r, Tlme ~ Amount r•~ ?ieu of drrec~ re~mtursement For the value of my seruiCes, t direct !ha* the?.~ nonie; Le used ..; aft sFt th¢ minimal support that She Cftr g~~.,ea tc non-nr r.~t /cu to sp cjr is or ganizatipns. Nar.,e t_-e~~._.L~~.ILL...L~+.~- hddraes V3t^ C?fIZE'P~i'S !::OS' RECOVERY pROGRAt•f As ~ ci4. zen of Ran.;;,,; Lu: amn.^.:i 2., o+ork 4he =ollowi ng hears :.. suppor+, of GuP vny 4;,, ',zat~cn !t;"n Jch - p Hour= Perrod DuratiGr CWeeP./hlon th) (p of M_n ihs+ H' tl',e C•.u ~•rn• rate pa~~ for timrlar Pos; ti on6 paid oY the CI tY, Mr -..... ~f .. cervi,:. ,.-~!:~ t;e appr~-x!mat¢t Y: *; og~t!~,n :.;; a,--~ ., Time ~ Amount ~, :P:: cif w!"eC% ry:ttu`•':r =rmun} i]f' the value of 71y 5¢rV!C¢S, ! dirlCL ''•,r ':~e'*~ ^,!:i a. ~ ~,ea~: ~;: Gf._,e4 the minimal 4uPPorz that the G rr . +- t~ a.. r•-r.rur~t c•. r;. ;per is on3anizations. ~!ar.,e 101-~..Ji-56d!~••~_ _.~S}' ~}'~~ A4 • [ik~2er of 4ancr '.~_s'. of our voutl. 5. ". ti%'ERl' PROGRAM ., ~r'r the following hours in support ® V' 1 ~q~ni.~~t`i'on =~~`trun .. ~L ; Perlotl Duration tutee M,/Month) tM of Mon ths~ At the cur^snt rate oa~~ f^^ ~a1ue of mr seruire >i~o~il ': ~. -. tons paid by the G tY, the IY1 City ?oaiti on Sal ar .~ Time ~ Amount hi li+u of oirec~ re~ru`.nr ~~e:n ~:~ .a!ae of my seruites, t direct }hat the3a r•~onirs ~ ~,e a~a ~.~oimal support that the Ci h~ gives tc non-nrofi t~•; e. th .:. .. ~: one. Mame ~C1_ rU~..-~LX,.Cr., i~dfV.~3~L. /~ Fudrsss _~~a~yd-..,./.~L:.11.4U6t.u/ k_~.~t, ~r 7~+L~~1./'~:/7147( (Li Dats __ '~,31~.~ - ~- C : ' 2 ;=-1'•: ' S :,. pfi'^ RECOIJERY PKZOGRAf~f n! cai l•nu';~. ~ i'.• ,orK ne ro!?owing hears .n support l:°yr at~cn ~n•, ;, c,n Jen - N Hours PerioO Duration tWeW/Mon tn) CN of Months, A` t°,F r. or ••yn• r1tP oa':] fpr Fimr!ar OSi t10n5 p pain by tn. Ci tr, tha ".~:". if ci• ~.en, .., ,~. ;~r1^ Cr ~ppr~.x imately: „-":> °,~,s~t,~.n Ss; ar -..._~ ., Tlme ~ r-Vriount of ~i.,•c niC;r -:n~n^ ao;. 2hR value of mi ser~icea 1 direr,t - - ~t.Ft the mf nimal support that thF Cat; ., .~. rc non-n..~:,! r•, L~ ~._; t:; or yanizati On_. - _...11-/_~ ~/.__... -____.. _ _- ct'rz~~rs• ~ _ . Of our v~V Yr. r] panizat~en PoSi ;: or, ._ Pt the tar~ynt rite oaid ~.. :a.tue of nr> senn ca ;.. o•ric :. City Poar tin Sal ar ~~~~ '~!E2"h' PFfOGF2A!-1 `.h^ following hours .n support ~~. Per:otl Dur9i`^ CWeeY./MOn M> <N of Mnn:hs, '.ions paid by the Cl ty, the Yi Time ~ Amount [~: lieu of di rec~ rY~mtr:r .., !:~e of my serui[esr t direct *hat tare;a monies be us+~.: ~~ ~ -~imal vupport that the C:tv g:~.es tc non-nrut~t •; cn r;. ~., .ons. Namr LuQ~ ~-',~y~p~ .. FJdress ~~,L3~„7~.c~ L2,1~'~k. YYf~t c- C//JC'l 'vats // /~-~/ ._..._~_. .~ L; i ^ I ='n: ' S S~ Os3T REGtJtJERI" PF(OGF?Ai9 1¢ >. cit, a-r c? ~an._; ~; Ca~:.mr_r:ya„ ! work trys tot?owing hour> .n suppo: t n! ew: .,rut.,. '=-9<•~'zat~=^~ Poe., .: on •Icb - p Hours Period Guraticn (We•Y./MOn ShJ (M of Mon Lhsl A` t!rh c~.,. ~•«n• rite oa,d fer 6imtlar pest bone paid O;' tn„ Ci tY, the .. .. ;f ,.~ :.fr•ti~;. n.._dIC Ge jpPt~.x,matel Y: ~>~-~.~.n vt ar -...-- .. 'ims . Lvnount 'inu of y, ^ec> ^~mL,r .e:n.o! Fur the value of mi serui CVS, I direr.t "~' ~'~-• --~ -= ..: ., :, oEl•; ~•t th¢ minimal support tAat tha Gtr ., ., 'c n.n-^,ro:~t~~c4 r;. r.r r=. nr 9anizations. ~.., > _> _7SS~~ycc~Jvay,_iQ. c. C I'fI2Er~:'S r_~ggT RECOVERI" PROGRAil1 as e. ci t: ]er. c? 4eo._; . ru~arnrry., i o+ork the foilowi nq hours fn u •~f our youth. s pport l~IrrS ~erivv uuratier CWeeY./MOn thJ CM of Hon ths) P' the cvr~en! rate oe~d fir Fimt!ar pOBi tion8 paid py the Cl tyr the =at v~ 04 erv sir v~ca ;h. ~aitl ca appr ax+mately: ~~~: ?os~;;i,n S~larr a Time ~ Amount ~' 1'°O of h~~'ec" ^r ~mGnr~;ymPr,t for the value of mY seru ices, I direct •!•xr c:,e-n r.,.miFa ~isrd !~~ of.>e! the minimal cuPPorc thak the Ci t>• ~__.. _~ o: :,tc, rc OJn-nr U•~f~..c~tP ^ptir LE organ liatl Ong. 14arix ~~~,~l.Yi ~%f'/"~//~~/ /~' ""~T'.4 ~~ S~vO r orAP • G ~,.> t ~. CZ ~S~F'Td' o ~:~?f3T. F:ECOVER'~ PROGRAPf qg ,. ,;j!, _or p- patlL`:i Lu~1m^r.ya, ! u~OrY th4 *017JW InQ tTOUra i'1 iUapO^t ~~t CWi~ ': CV [t~. (~4n//nwu 3 ~.y ~;.~~.~za t'cn .'~i~i~~-~ Jch - p Hour= Period Durdticr (We W,'Menth) (p of hlon thsr f.` t!~~e c•r ,•;..t. -ate aa;d r^r Ei!prlgr poll Lions pale by the CIt%, the -EI:._ if ., •.fry,~.. a :~•rlr. Ge dp~r.]%i mgtel Yl .. ~,:; i,n .~1 dr- ---, Tim! ~ Amount l ,a~. .~f ^.. ^z: ~' - ,:.v ,r:rt~n` .or the vdl uQ of m% seruices~ i di^!r,t .. ~ '~~aiF3 ... .. O`, Jft the ml nlNdl 4UPPOP2 t11dt LhP ~i :. .. - rC ~.-. ~..^J; ~t~'Cl th 'tP:; fc fif ~i,ni2LtIOPS. _1+41~ ..__.. _~. r_ : ' 1 ~ t_r•: ' ~ ~-:OST r~ECQ~JER~ PROGR.=+t~f qe c., !, ]er 2an.cr •~ Lo:. a'nr_n. v?., t work the =ottoaing hours .n >uppc^[ ~,< <.~,woR~~t;,.~,)fud C1e,RN up f-Fik~e~ pIaC~CC~ t 9AMe.5 ~2~ SNA c. `~. B.ae CH) Don~hons in S»A~ bae ~'~~ Fu/lo( RAts~,e.s n Foabl and monies. ~///~. n at~)rn P~•i ;•~yn__II~__--Jce - N Hour= Pprietl 6uratier !/~~/ yAL/lICGC~- (Week/Men th7 (p of Months, N' the G~~r ~~ent rite v,,d 4or similar positions paitl by the ~i tY, thz ,. .. t m• •,e n~,... _, :.~t.^. ca >ppr :ximatel Y: ,. •., Rpgi ti~,f! :.il df '... _.--_.-. Tim! s anoun „r., o' v :ec" r:~n„~,v ,e:nen" to:' the ual ue 04 mY SPrU i Cl~i, t iii rest •h:.t '..,. .. .-.„,I<; _ ,sa.,; ~:. cf,.;..• the minimal cupporL ibdt the C~i'i .. .. .r n.r,-r,ro~.t 'r_.. rr :p_r//s rr gar,izaticne. emu.,;, aea .l^ ~.~__ ~~T~K/p~..--~~ ~= T- ~ I ~ Eht ' ~ !,-.,;.~- RECOVERY P R Ci G RAi~t 4¢ ', iit, >, r. G' 4am.r :~ Lam:-amn..:y i., 1 work t o GW' ': 7V .n, h- ~O!'JW 1:19 hOJri ,., sU?Part '1 zat ~ cn _ P ,c (rCl2 ~~ o~,-yxe ~`~ ~Jch MrHours Perrotl (Week: Man th) fivration <8 of hl^n tbs) A` the C~rr;,,;.:1• rite pa nj fer =i2r}er poll Irons partl or the C(ty, Y.he ''ery••. n, :~rlr, ::a jPGrax,mat¢1 Y: Cary n~~5,.i,•^ C>9; ar __..___ TIRrQ a AlrlOUnt :. of y,;'.aco- ^¢~m:,:;r :e:,,ap^ i:~^ the n:,e,;, _, -. ~ value of m'r seruie¢sr t di rent ' ." -'"'" "~~ ~.' aer.et ine minimal auPPorc that thF C, Gr gani 2ati0n5. r -..., e~, . _I~_~rL.~ktU.~LI.,~~~ ~~.i{A, 1~G~~ )a. , .,i~ `fir l~ .. _.II~~I__...._~. _____- - CITic=_ra~ _, _ . AY ~, i t t 1 Zen Gf 4an._; ~: •lf OUP voV ti!. -V -•, _.• ~~R~y, pROGRAhi 'h^ 2otlowi ng hours .n supper; ~ss.G~(;/off is ~ ~i4X^~//' 9 j/{~/'~ _ YH2/' W / W/ry 9. pan i z a t ! -'~'-t~ w/YJ / en /''I~~t; ur Periotl Durati~p~ --' <We~V./%on th) (M of M^n thsr A+ the [ur~rn! rrte pail '- ='d.IVe tlf ^r" 3enl iCQ 3~..O.i1 •-,..,. inns pain by the Cl ty, th• r: Cis, Pose tir,n Sal ar :- -,...~ ['r lieu of Ci reU re ~mL~;r .. ~,.. 'hat t}e3J noniog ve ~~5;~,; g;~/es tc nan-nr u>,t ;co tr -. Time : Amouni . '~i of my seruites~ I direct ', rnial support that the C.; ons. ' tiara. ~~fu ~`~ `",~' f' «-,~ eA a L ~e e .. +r.exJ,-l Cep R/73 Gj At • ci t, zer,, p? aansGn `~.. __.: of our ~cu t;.. - _sJER4' PROGRfi1-1 :Ar following hours .n ;uppor4 _~~~ iv~y,~- -_ ~~ . ~ 9 mss. Organrzat'cn PnS.r l: or, Period Durat ion a +rC~U.ea,k~o-a~- CdOKIdB . ~ lWeak/Mon th> CM of Months, ~ a~~ ~ p _ ~ SU ~ ~ ~ ' ~ CK. Rangy L'J~i.i•r..a~ . At the cvrr.;n! rate o+,d ~... •.: +ans paid pY the City, thr ~i.)U°. of nrv 9Qr4iCe 3r`~O•rl:] .. y: ~>~ _ Ci!% p09, tll+n jai dl^~~~~ (~i Iiau of tli reee r~~mtnr ,- that tne3e GrJ!ili~ yp i~ari; g; ves to nun-nru' ~ t ; c;; kr r. Nam. a n~ yyalC~ A~dr r?s _ 3,_•Q`{.3_~~[/^ Ism Gzta d4Er/Ya ~~. 9i 7o I me ~ wnount ~!ue o{ my services, t direr: ~nimat support tha4 *.he G n• .~anm. Latc -- //,_~~y~ CITIZEN'S COST RECO~IERY EROGRAM Art a cltizer, of Renc6o Cu:;.ma•.yr, i orarK the fOllowinq flours in support of;Our youth. ~ Cr~S . Organizati on Position Jun - b ~-ieurs Period Our a ion tWeeK/MOn th> tM of Mon th s> At the current rate paid for z~m~'•~ poa, Lions paid by th• City, the value a4 mr service ihouly to ap~r >: as elY; Cily Position Salarr --~-~~-r Tlme ~ Amount ?h Lieu of Direct reimbur ;emFn'~ +a}ue of my seruites, i direct that there moniec be uela !~~ a?• ~ ~ minimal tuDPort tAat the City q,ues to nor,-profit youto sD::r!-~ a';:~ :at~ona. Name ~//i/D. /. Address 7t1 'Y'~~~~~-CiJC1 Date ~~ .r!.`.f~9.1_-.~__ _..~,_~ CITIZEN'S COST RECC)VERY PROGiRAM As a citizen of Ranc r~o Cu: anon ya, worK the 4ollowinp hours in support of;our YOUth. I ~~pn~_,`t ^^~~ ~ ~ UlLUtiv/v ll~n~ a2 ~ . 10~C . 9 ~5 0 ganizati on Posits Jch ~- i ur< perio0 Dur aion (Week/Mon M) (M of Months> At the cu. rent rate paid for e~m~~•: pos. lions paid by tM Cl ty, tM value of mr service ihouitl to np;•v; ~,.a e1Y: City Position Salary ~~~ ~ Time ~ anount Io lieu of Direct reimbur semen° - +alue of my servitesr t direct that these monies be uses to c-, ~ ~. minimal support that the City gives tc nun-profit youth spcrt•. :stluns. Name c ~ _- .~ _.~. Address ~~ 1'a-4-t,tQ_ ' Uate ~!1 1 q~ ,_ _~ CIT72EN'S COfiT RECOVERY i•RO6RAM Aa A CIt12an of Rancho Cu:amor. y:., ? work the fol of ,our youth. lowing hours in su pport Ehlul,, Toan„ n,gm, ~ O gan~zati on Position ~~ ~ rn~' Joh - h uo'-;ours Perled Ouraipn tWe-klMOntn) <N of Months) At the current rate paid for z~m•!. value of mr ssrvice should to ar p~.,, ,T~o sQti ohs Palo br the Cl tr, the Y. City Position Salary -`-'"~"- Tims ~ Amoun! t~ liau of direct reimbur semen •~ That these monies be u ~ value of mr seruites~ t di ract gives !c norr rofit stc !;, os. ~ m~nimat suPPort that P YoutR spar tc _ ~[ati ono. the City Name (J!/LLCI~/~(,Q] ,~(-Q/r~v Addrass _,~Q j_ Uate / /`~ 9~ --- -~ CIT22EtV'S COST REGO~IERY rRO6RAM As a ci tixsn of R•ncne Cu~amcnyz, [ o.crK the following hours in support of ,~OUr youth. T~Rairri+ nl9Jlt~ ~~ /!/1X! ~ u)71 ~'n'r~cs Or dnixation Positron JcC - >• '~eor5 PsriOtl DyratiOn CWesK/MOnth) (N of Months) At the current rite p•id for 6~M~;-: pes~ti ons paltl Oy the City, the value of mr asrvic• should ba ap~•::~~.:teiY: City Posi lion Salary --- ~~ Time ~ Amount ?~ 1i•u of direct rermourseme •~` ra ue of my services: I direct that these monits Ge used !o n'• minimal support that the Crtr gruel tc non-profit youth sp cr t~ ; _ rations. Nam. Q .~~tv 2J~ea..tt~ n C, n ~ ~ p Address ~~73~ m~r~~SE~Q~. ~d0 Date 1 / ~ 9 l~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROCiRAh'1 As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga I work the following hours in support of our youth. C~.~.. t~ Htr< L~a.~c,~c l_cAC,t~r_ ~z,_'.n 'aln.~Le,.. ~ HRS. ,.,;N. Pe....,~~ck zation Position Job - M Hours Peri od Duration (WeeK/Month) (N ofgMon th s)p~ O 7! 4 X / ~- .~~0 At the current rate paid for similar positions paid by the CItY: the value o4 my service should be approz imatel y: City Position Salary x Time Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the gal ue of my services: I direct that these monirs be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports oryanizatl ons. Name ~ ~~~c-,.i III<~•Ic~(S Address ~~`~ly ~v~a ~C Ems.. ~~ Date I I-1~,-°11 CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamon gay t work the following hours in support of our youth. Cn,~(~ n9,q,.,,,Q ~f C u-a'UK //w'L+lry~ P~~K 3 v wau'K S//z n,s~.bC h7/}n/1~c3• 6A+h1~7 ~. c weWx. U /z max, Organization Position Job - s rerioq uurati on (WeeK/Mon th> (q of Months) At the current rate paid 4or similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approzimately~ City Position Salary x Time = [n lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my seruices~ 1 direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City glues to na profit youth sports organ lzations. ~~~ Marne ~' I (~~~ Address J ~~ I ~ °~~ns ~/~Cf. /'T~ Date ~~J CITIZEN`S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM , As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonpa~ I worK the following hours in support of our youth. /}LTA IA,NA ~PJ ~A ~QCe.s 3 I+R.S U;K- `4, unuin~is z ation Position Jo - N Hours Pe r,lod Duration CWeeK/Month> CN of Months) At the current rat• paid for similar positions paid 6y the City, th• v alu• of my service should be approximatelY~ City Position Salary x T'me a:~auni ]n Iipu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to -nYon-pnnr ofit youth sports organ izatlons. Name Jlr'i t7l ar~rJ l: l,t.~ OtJ PIt;JML.F AF SR-• ASrRnS~Rai• S~ISO~~~ \ 's'2.8w 6SA4S CW ~ ti1r6M1- lx l~LyVE/i Address q+k33 Otz-aN~i6 s'r, ,~ L~~ra I~Na, ~~ ~~~ 4aui~e~s CW~~'TER- IcPC,~E~ ca a(i7o i Date ~~Ii tol I~ -~ . CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga I worK the •f ollowing hours {n support of our youth. -f~actces b hn tv~k Trlfeiv~ 2hn. >~r ~~mor~~4hS ~LLL m6/;. ~~es 8nrs. t.)eetc ganization Posl lion Job - M Nours Pe ri od Duration (WeeK/Mon th) (M of Months) At the current rate paid for similar positions paid by the City the value of mr sem ice should be approx lmatelys City Position Salary x Time Amount In lieu of direct relmbur sement for that these monies 6e used to offset glues to non-profit youth sp or to ors Name _~HIt_ {~-S~ ~ Jn be1'b~ Address 1~~~ J~~ ::7. ~L"IfF (1 the value of my seruices~ I direct the minimal support that the City lanizati ons. ~~nlo- Vcnkee~ C W~Ma sR.s.)•,~ 3i5Leuy~,vGnke~ Luinte. s~,~ f o{ Sen~~.- Ycnkees ~cey~~r ~ft~~ MA CF4. Date ~~'~1'~1~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM Rs a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the following hours in support of our youth. ~~ CcrM. /J M~~ ~ Y~/~~~G ~.~' /'/ ~. L~cs~'IC ZL'~,"r'-~xS ~n~ ~L~t; ~C~~1G' ~/.~= L.;eZK ~8 L`o'ut ~j1j~t'¢' QiUIS/~N ~IC~T1^kJS /~S ~ltim.aE F~ ~~ Organization Position Job - M Hours Perri od Duration (Week/Mon th) (M of Months) At the current rate paid for similar positions paid by the City, the value of mY service should be approx imately~ City Position Salary x Time (mount In lieu of tlirect reimbursement for the value o4 mY services, 1 direct tha t these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City give to non-p fit youth ~' sports organizations. 1 Z 8 ~ ~--~ ~ ~-- ~ ~ Name I Z~ ~ ~ rJ m2 O i ~ i ~ i ~1 f~ ~,s ~~ Mr Address - ~ A,, lJG N'VIS ~1 ~~~~w~. ~S l l ~CN~j~ VIS jam' _ nn INT. ~~ `U JS ~v~ _.-'. Date I'Q Ar ; K (~~-l> I ~ ~: x)11 (i i Tp-C' pC SSA "~ ~~}., ~( is~.9~2 ~..rL~~ ~~,~ r-~ sshi ~ ~~., _l mita~~ r s~~~ SR~h - P 1 ~ `I~~~S M~nArt~~ ._ . .. .. (,ri/-2 ~~A ~~7` `J 3~~1 C~2r.i., ~ZoN Cr.Ff-~ls~, , (^, 3. ~, SUNSI~~J4 f}-( 7i,v~ ~CCic r s7.3~ snFp~„~ ~ ._ .. ,~~. any N~ti-- }; 1, 3 5 CI 17?LN ~~.__... - i o (~~ 1~ rv~ ~-~Q. ~~,cw-~ SAd~;Y~F-A `i~ac~ T~~I~Uo~S~, CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamon gay I work the following hours in support of our youth. ~ll~~(,~~ M~i~l~. CfM^~4 y ~ wp~Y 3 i/Z r.e.-~ Organization Position Job - M Hours Per,i od Duration tWeek/Month) CM of Months) At the current rate paid for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately: City Position Salary x Time a Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives tjj non-p(r ofit youth sports organizations. ~,,.LL ~lt<-//~~~Q. ~ Raves- J ~~1-~ ~ . /~" Mam~e ~l ~ V r 1 L{~. Address Ov1 ~ ti U~11, 1y y[J /'1. l Date i ~ 1 ! S I CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in suppor! of our youth. 3 o L2wrc}1 (oq~„ 4.0 ,8 woes ~a~' ~ (L.p;. z,o 8 w'ez~s. Al. Lrrrti: Ce`•~j~E Or ganizati on Position Job - N Hours Pe ~i od Duration (WeeK/Man th) (N o4 Months) At the current rate paid for similar positions paid by the Cily, the value of my service should be appr oximatelY: City Position Sal arr x lime = Amoun! In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the CItY gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name /`~~~~' (~~ 1~ ~M 12Q~. Address ~36Z N~~~ S' OE A L ~- Date ~1-1~~~1 CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of of ovr youth. Rancho Cucamon qa~ I worK the following hours in support A~ Crl7c~ (tn~~~ ( r,~ y.c Wax. ~y WET Organization Position Job - N Hours Pe r,iod Duration (Week/Month> (M of Months) At the current rate paid for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximatelyt City Position Salary z Tlme = Amount [n lieu of direct relmbursemen! for the value of my services, I direct that these monies 6e used to offset the minimal support that thr Clty gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. ~'~ Oo~ ~ 1~~~~ Address ~~~!) Sll7"U Date ~~~`I CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM ; As a citizen afi Rancho Cucamonga, I worK the fiollowing hours in support of our rou th. ~~ct ~. O . k) mow' I i~L M c N T~. ~L Ll ~~rtE L~~ lkXfcl~ ~M`~~ `I,C WCS~~. 3~~L M+ti-G/-r Organization Position Job - M Hours Per,i otl Duration (WeeK/Month) (M of Months) At the current rate pa{d for similar post tf ons pa{d by the City, the value of my service should be appr oximatelys City Position Salary x Tlme Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the valua o4 my services I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City p'~+ gives to non-profit youth sports organizati on s. r ~v 11 ` ~' 1- /' n ~ /~ ~~~ Name G IAN ~7~~ F-5T /~ Address 5 ~ ~ c~ I ~ ~O j,~ F /Y~ Date ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~l I CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cuc amonga~ I work the following hours in support of eur youth. ~i!a Lw...a G,H/e ~ ~,: L4 wee Y~wrJ~ti Organization po Ilion Job - N Hours Period Durali n ---~--~--- - -1Wask.[Mon.lh.L.-Sll~f Months> ,fs5. canal, y,o ,,,<./~ S yu,u.t~j ~- - - ~/~ ~/ y S= ~S~u-- At the current rate for similar positions paid 6y the City the value of my service should be approxlmatelyi City position ary x me m Amoun In lieu of direct reimbursemen! for the value of my services, 1 direct lh at these monies bs used to offset the minimal support that the CIly gives to non-profit youth sports organizalf ons. Name ~fj /tt lsalw/un, Address ~es3/ ~~/rfi D/~ a~ ~~y~.yp. Date !/-Iy-9i CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRFaM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 worK the following hours in support of our youth. f SU l3<~ae. 3-{~axg w«k- 4~"~^"IaS ~~~~~~~ --~ ~ - CWeeK/MOnth) CN of M~nths) I; H+}vl~..+- ~tfk ~ tp~H~.- ,NS. cOnat~. v.n wt.,w s m.+,.+r, At the current rate for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be appr oximatel Y: on Salary x Time = In Lieu of direct reimbursement for the value o4 mY services, I direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name /",,L. I~// M+I':- Adtlress ~~~ lls l~_Qy' .JK~#'~"'Q Date !/-!y 9~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PR013RAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work the following hours in support of our youth. ~l(~G l<~}N~~ n l+R. [.rte - g > N.c hc.~..hC. ~ izati on Position Job -s Period Duration CWeek/MOn th) CM of Months) At the current rate paid for similar positions paid by the City, the value of my service should be approximately City Position Sai ary x Time = Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, [ direct that these monies be used to offset the minimai su ppor! that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizatf ons. Name :'X-x-c- ~~~n+.lL ( /h. ~ ~ ~~ ",~"' f~~. ~ ~'~'~`,,~,..lj Address ~ lJ7o~~ ~~ / Date //~(r /`/~ Ti CITIZEN'S COST RE C~OVERY PROG RF~NI As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I work th• following hours in support of our youth. ~u,~.-.-r~~.~a2p'.,,~ az~r.~.isd 3.~ ~.K nI{~ s. o ~,,,,-~ ~ 1', rep. /D.~ s.~. ~<.~ ,(~¢5u{ufow /o -.ZCi lrrs per smw~. on PocitAhn' " .inh - °~+ VUraYI On (Weak/Month) (p of Months) qt th• currant rata paid for similar positions paid Dy the Clty, the value of my service sh outd t» approximately CItY Position Sal arr x Tima ~ Amount In lieu of direct relmbursamant fvr the value of my services, I direct that these monies be used to off cet the minimal support that th• City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name ~¢, C j qq~ pp ~i Address ~`J ~i-E' ~or~~rVg~tRTP~~C.UA ~-l..t~g vk.~_ q~~~p Date _ ~~- IS3-`j~ C I T I 2 EFd' S CiJ ST RECC'J ERY PFdO C~RP+M As a citizen of P.ancho Cur amonga+ 1 worth the following hours in support 04 our youth. Or ganiz~~ion Position Job - ,,// ~~ ~~~ - 7 .. ~ ~G. !rn •n t.>~~'M~~4"'~ L'ASlrryl,: j( C~rt,~,~.~:,~,r,,;, N Nours h NI~f~R4 S~;e< Period !Week/Month7 NCI ik ~~c ~~~( wank Duration <q of Months> e~. MONI ~.S ~~P At the current mr service sho rate for similar p uld be approximatel ositions y: paid by the Citr~ the value of I. 1..7 ° ~i iti on Salary x Time = In lieu of dire+a reimbursement far the valve o4 my services, ! direc[ that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit YoV th sp or [s or ganizations. Name ~ E f. S ~O l F ~LtAFI a •i.L[J(~( Address l~~l ~ l!~•;~ rt bate 11`~x~-/~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY RROORANI As a citizen of P.ancho Cucamonga, I worN the following hours in support of our youth. n'isfl Ca><rer.~._l ~. l~ __ _ - LS weeks _ _ Organization osi ion Job - N Hours Period "---- Duration ~~/,7.~7~ (WeeK/M nn th) <N " of Mon lhs) ~ru 1~1~a '%1'. le ~ ri".~ C ~(TA ~'!J = At the current rate for similar positions paid by the Citr~ the value of my service should be approximatelys l~~S rn~ ,.~~~, L.,,i Imo?) y Posi H on Shcary x Time In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my aervices~ 1 direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to non-profit youth sports organizations. Name F~~~ m• ~G~~`-' Address /L~3~ GAn10L~7N00~ Date ///~y~1 CITIZEN`S COST REC OI.'E RY PROORAN As a citizen of Rancho Cucamon gay I work the following hours in support of our youth. _ o Conch Poa~/ ee/T l~. Na ,reek y~ 1( S NeNyN ~~' L/~ ReFr.e« 4.o We.k ~G x Sn.a vy ~yJ~V Venn Conch L.S wceK ~L ~ SnevzN ~.~(~ Organization Posl Lion Job - M Hours Period Duration tWeek/Mon th> cM of Months) At the current rate for similar positions Daid by the CitY~ the value df my service should be aOProximatelyf r7 1 ~~1~' ~~ayc~ on Salary x Time ~ In lieu of direct reimbursement for the value of my services, I direct that those monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gives to norpr ofit youth sports organizations. Name nen,J M /~Lac/C Address Jl.ro Sna l3e.eNA.pd.:~e l<~.~qa//7 Date //• /N~ 9/ CITIZEN' S COST F'EC Ot1E R.Y F•ROC3RAP~ As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, 7 work the following hours in support of our youth. QIL.$'D [~eaa~ 6/tR Puc week yrnu~vTi~s skl~,ea•. Organization Position Job - e Hours Period Duration 7~~r ~rn qC~e ~M-~o< <WeeklMontA) <p of Months) p7 V oj~ilec Ive~k ~. Me..7~t ~!J/9.flc~!f~rt~r./~` ~MC~/q<<'<zrr.;~~S~Rt w[t~ ~!~{, Mn.~7~~5- ~/ZI At the current rate fior similar positions paid by the CitY~ the valve of my service should be approximately: ~~~~J y Position Salary x Time = [n Iigu of direr.t reimbursement for the valve of my servlces~ t direct that these monies be used tv offset the minimal suppork that the City gives to non-profit youth sports or ganizatl on s. Name DRUE h~S~U~F .t~laut P.nYll/tat[ Address IIII 1/.•~(rt.ae_ Date ~~-~~i/-7~ CITIZEN'S COST RECOVERY PROGRAM As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, i worN th• following hours in support of our youth. lc~ fa.~-- .d~ Pik ~,~t aa2o ._/i,4~.~ a~ -~ ~~~~~~, a~i~.teko~~~J 7i Organization Position Job - N Hours Pe r,iod Duration (WeeK/MOn th) CN of Months) At the current rate paitl for similar positions paid by the City the ualu• of my service should br approximately City Position Salary x Tlme ~ Amount In lieu of direct reimbursement for the ual u• of my service s, 1 direct that these monies be used to offset the minimal support that the City gibes to non'profit youth sports organizati on s. Name n~/,Y)"2V // ~p-p~- ~~~_ Address N7/i.3 ~L h770(, ~I"-! Da:e Il~i~/9/ ~~ ~~ -moo - ~~eti~~~ - ~ ~~~ ~ -~ /~o--G~CIZ ~/a ~o~~ ~~~ .~ce~eba~ /.h 7~