Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/07/21 - Agenda Packet< �r cir � Z V 1977 CfrY OF RANCHO CLICAMONGA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California July 21, 1982 - 7:30 p.m. Ay 2e n/ All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Dahl_, Buquet, Schlosser_, Frost_, Mikels_ C. Approval of Minutes: None • 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS ��J^—a...t =^...� Cc-- u-- Y'>1 --• a. Thursday, July 22, 1982, 6:30 p.m. - BUDGET MEETING - Lions Park Community Center. b. Wednesday, July 28, 1982, 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. Reconsideration of Terra Vista Land Use Map. • 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Reg. No. 82 -7 -21, in the amount of $ 345,957.42 1 b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Terry D. Thomas, Pizza Royal, 4 8671 Base Line Avenue for on sale beer and wine eating place. c. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Eun Nee and Song Hwa Ho, 6 Tummy Buster, 8798 19th Street foron sale beer and wine eating place. c City Council Agenda -2- July 21, 1982 d. Set public hearing for August 4, 1982 for Zone change No. 80 -11 and certification of the Environmental Impact Report - NEEVA- The change of zone is from A -1 (limited agriculture) to R- 1- 20,000 (Single Family residential on 20,000 sq. ft. lots) and R -3 (multiple family) for 65 acres of land located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east and adjacent to Chaffey College and extending south to Banyan. The change of zone and environmental impact report are the result of a request to develop single family dwellings and 508 multiple family .ie;ellings (Tentative Tract No. 11550) e. Authorization to Execute Building Maintenance (Janitorial Service) _ Agreement for City Offices (9320 "C" and 9340 "A ", "B ", "C", "O ", 6 "E" Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California) and Lions Park Community Center (9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California) as approved in F.Y. 82 -83 budget. f. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement for single family residence _ located at 13235 Victoria Avenue - Murillo. RESOLUTION NO. 82- 120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY • FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 13235 VICTORIA AVENUE. g. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agree- ment for 5249 Carol Avenue. It is recommended that Council adopt the Resolution authorizing City Clerk and Mayor to sign said real property improvement contract and lien agreement for 4249 Carol Avenue submitted by Thomas and Aida Aramayo. RESOLUTION NO. 82- 121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM THOMAS AND AIDA ARAMAYO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK. TO SIGN THE SAME. h. Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion. _ S.A. 79 -10 - located at 9900 Arrow Route, Church of the Nazarene. Pass Book (Road Improvements) $6,500.00 RESOLUTION NO. 82- 122 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR SITE APPROVAL 79 -10 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. 8 15 17 24 25 31 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE. AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANCES SUBSTAN- TIALLY AS SET FORTH IN THE REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931 "; THAT THE PROJECT IS FEASIBLE: AND THAT THE LANDS WILL BE ABLE TO CARRY THE BURDEN OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT. • City Council Agenda -3- July 21, 1982 i. Approve Humane Society Agreement to an indefinite extension 34 _ of the animal control contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga on a month to month basis. j. Authorize San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture, 39 Weed Abatement Division to Act as City of Rancho Cucamonga Agent in administering Chapter 5, Section 27.051- 27.057 (removal of Abandoned Orchard ;) of the San Bernardino County Code (these sections adopted by reference- Ordinarce 137). This will be done on an individual case basis and at the request of the City. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. FORMATION OF INDUSTRIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 40 Recommend that Council hear public testimony and complete all appropriate action to order the formation of Assessment District 82 -1. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -123 56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S • "REPORT" IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -124 58 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING AND DENYING PROTESTS AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -125 60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE. AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANCES SUBSTAN- TIALLY AS SET FORTH IN THE REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931 "; THAT THE PROJECT IS FEASIBLE: AND THAT THE LANDS WILL BE ABLE TO CARRY THE BURDEN OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT. • City Council Agenda -4- July 21, 1982 RESOLUTION NO. 82 -126 61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND PRO- VIDING FOR CONTRIBUTION TO PAY CERTAIN COSTS AND EXPENSES IN AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. lJ B. 0 RESOLUTION NO. 82 -127 62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE, TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES, AND APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -128 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO EXERCISE THE RIGHT OF E14INENT DOMAIN TO ACQUIRE EASEMENTS ACROSS PROPERTY FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 IMPROVEMENTS. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -129 73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING THE CON- TRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. RESOLUTION N0, 32 -130 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND IIAKI14G AWARD FOR SALE OF BONDS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REDEMPTION FUND FOR THE PAYUENT OF SAID BONDS, Kecoiaiend second reading and approval of Ordinance No. 180 to remove drainage fees within the area of Assessment District 82 -1 and rescind Ordinance No. 111 which established a Special Drainage Impact Zone with the Assessment District area. 76 City Council Agenda -5- July 21, 1982 ORDINANCE NO. 180 (Second Reading) 77 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNIONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING RECISSIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN ORDINANCES RELATING TO DRAINAGE REGULATIONS IN THE CITY. C. VACATION OF UNNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PROJECT 80 unnecessary streets and alleys within the Victoria project. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF UNNECESSARY STREET AAD ALLEYIIAYS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PROJECT. D. ZONE CHANGE NO. 82 -01 - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT 84 ' REVIEW 82 -04 - LEWIS. change o Zone from - Limited gricul- ture to A -P Administrative Professional) for 2.045 acres of • land for the development of a 28,800 sq. ft., two -story office building. The project site is located within the Terra Vista Planned Community area located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Church Steet and Foothill Blvd. APN 1077 - 421 -06. ORDINANCE NO. 181 (First Reading) 87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1077 - 421 -06 FROM A -1 (LIMITED AGRI- CULTURE) TO A -P (ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL) FOR 2.045 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMIUNITY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND FOOTHILL BLVD. E. GENERAL PLATT AMENDMENT 82 -016 - Proposed Amendment to General _1_1_4_ Plan Circulation Element to redesignate Highland Avenue from 19th Street to East Avenue from secondary to collector standard. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -132 139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE ADOPTED CIRCULATION PLAN FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE. n u • City Council Agenda � July 21, 1982 F. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS. The proposed agreement wau d establish y ordinance imposition 0--a fee payable at the tima of application for a building permit for those lots or parcels of land with respect to which frontage improvements have been installed pursuant _p to a reimbursement agreement. Recommend that this item be continued to August 4, 1982 G. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Recommend approval of annual Engineer's report setting a rate of $45.00 per lot for the 1983 tax year. IAA RESOLUTION NO. 82 -133 tJ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CA� RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE AINTENANCE DISTRICT YEAR 19 C/ N0. 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAIN• ' _1_, DISTRICT NO. 1. 5. CITY MANAGER STAFF REPORTS � A. Consideration of placing a measu'r v ovenber Ballot making the office of Mayor an elective position by the voters. B. ACCEPTANCE OF BONDS, AGREEMENTS, FINAL MAP, EASEMENTS AND FORMATION OF DISTRICTS FOR TRACT 11934, 12044, 12045, and 12046 - WILLIAM LYON•CO14PANY (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY PHASE 1) RESOLUTION NO. 82 -134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE- MENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, IIIPROVEFIENT AND MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND FINAL tIAP OF TRACTS NO'S. 11934, 12044, 12045 and 12046 C. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO ESTABLISH A STREET LIGHTING ASSESSiiENT DISTRICT 83 FOR THE VICTORIA PLANNED CO ?GMUUITY (TRACT .NOS. 11934, 120.14, 12045, 12046) AND TO SLT A DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 145 146 148 153 165 174 City Council Agenda • -7- RESOLUTION NO. 82 -136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PF,O- CEeDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT A3 PURSUANT TO THE LAND- SCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM STREET LIGHTING 14AINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972. July 21, 1982 O. REQUEST APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY). RESOLUTION NO. 82 -138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PRO- CEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 110. 2 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972. lJ RESOLUTION NO. 82 -139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE LANDSCAPE MAIN- TENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORK LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 E. REVIEII IIAINTENANCE AND LIABILITY CONCERNS - CARNELIAN CHANNEL Fc-cucst for poliiydirect oon front the CounciT-concerning maintondnce and access to the portion of Carnelian Channel between Carnelian Street extending north to Hillside to Vicara Drive. 40 179 176 207 208 209 City Council Agenda -8- July 21, 1982 RESOLUTION NO. 82 -141 214 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMUNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DRAINAGE EASEMENTS PER r, TRACTS NO'S 9324 and 9080. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REP RTS 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS 215 A. Discussion of possibility of formation of Parks and Trails Com- mission. B. ADJOURNMENT • • 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 12044 (Basin) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as City, by and between said City and R.C. LAND CO. hereinafter referred to as the Developer. WITNESSETH: THAT WHEREAS, a temporary retarding basin shall be constructed for Tract 12044, being an Improvement Requirement of said City for said Tract (the "Basin); and, WHEREAS, the Developer shall own and maintain the Basin until such time as the Downstream Master Planned Storm Drain System is completed, and accepted by said City, or a retarding basin is constructed at another location and is approved for use on Tract 12044 by the City, and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of maintenance security, as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be sufficient to guarantee continual maintenance of the Basin. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer agrees to construct at Developer's expense the Basin per the provisions of the Subdivision Agreement for Tract 12044. 2. The Developer agrees to maintain the Basin, to the satisfaction of the City, at no expense to the City. The area required to be maintained is shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Such maintenance shall include the yearly cleaning of debris from the Basin, to maintain design capacity, removal of vegetation, maintenance of all fencing, inlet and outlet structures dnd pest control, restoration of private property betweeu the basin and existing channel facilities. Ali such maintenance shall be done prior to November 1 of each year. Developer shall further perform such regular maintenance as may be required for the normal operation of the Basin. In the event an emergency situation arises concerning the Basin, the City may require the Developer to perform reasonable maintenance activities within twenty -four (24) hours from the receipt of written demand therefore from the City. 3. Developer agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against any and all liability arising from Developer's maintenance of the Basin as provided herein. 4. If after thirty (30) days following notification by City of deficient maintenance of the Basin, the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause work to be done by any lawful means, and thereupon to use the hereinafter stated cash security and /or recover from said -i- Developer the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. Developer shall be billed for said costs and shall make restitution to City . within thirty (30) days of date of billing, and or replace said cash securities used. Should Developer fail to make said restitution, within the time alloted, then the City will cause a lien to be filed, against said Developer on the real property described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, for said restitution plus all reasonable attorney fees. 5. This agreement shall remain in full force and effect from the date hereof until notice by City that required construction of a Downstream Master Planned Storm Drain sewer is completed and accepted for maintenance by said City. At that time said maintenance security shall be returned to Developer and this agreement shall terminate. 6. The maintenance security is to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement and shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney. The principal amount of said maintenance security shall not be less than the amount shown below: Maintenance Security Submitted: Total Cash $5,000.00 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be • duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on dates set forth opposite their signatures. Date 8 Date h�h CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION By Jon D. M11kels, Mayor Attest: • Lar Date , Appr V.d a Fo /j JUN 8 1982 City N toFA67 -2- POLICY STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CONCERNING THE PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM - JULY 20, 1982 It shall be the policy of the Flood Control District to cooperate fully with the cities in Zone "W" concerning the benefit assessment for flood control. Specifically, the Flood Control District shall honor the priorities which are established by individual cities for the expenditure of monies raised in each city after thirteen percent (13 %) of the funds are allocated to regional projects. The agreements between the cities and the Flood Control District shall indicate that regional facilities will be maintained by the Flood Control District and local facilities will be maintained by the individual city. 7/82 EXHIBIT "A" (BASIN) PARCEL 1 A 110 FOOT'WIDE EASEMENT OVER THAT PORTION OF BLOCK S, OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THE CENTERLINE BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3, OF SAID BLOCK, THENCE S89055'19 "E 233.73 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOO °15'35 "W 211.04 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S00015'35 "'W 145.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1000.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17012'17" AN ARC LENGTH OF 300.28 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "A ", THE SIDELINES AT THE SOUTHERLY END OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL TERMINATE AT A LINE HAVING A BEARING OF N89054'24 "'W. PARCEL 2 • A 600 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT OVER THOSE PORTIONS OF BLOCK 2, OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24 OF MAPS, AND PARCEL MAP 1, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 1, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE ABOVE - REFERENCED POINT "A ", THENCE N89054'24 "W 1535.06 FEET; THENCE SO0005'45 "W 600.00 FEET; THENCE 589054'24 "E 2000.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 7 OF SAID BLOCK S; THENCE N00005045 "E 600.00 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ITS NORTHERLY PROLONGATION TO A POINT WHICH IS N00005145 "E 8.91 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7, THENCE N89054'24 "W 464.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. • EXHIBIT A -1 IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. 7/8/82 509.54' Z4,19 EXHIBIT "A-I" (BASIN) BASE LINE AVENUE Worm LINE DT LDT '0 LA �'Omtl LL1JA9Z174 11,200, W-A o PARCEL 65' P3, X-1001:1.50• N69.54•zvw -cf—; OLIT 2001L0D, 153506' —OW %Wcolz 11 F,1fiCFL 7 LD-r 11 F519 5, MI.2/24 *q 7 LIXE 131 509.54' Z4,19 • • EXHIBIT 'B' LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR BASIN LOTS 3,6,11, AND 14, IN BLOCK "S" OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 3, BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3, 150 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 200 FEET PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE WEST 218 FEET; THENCE NORTH 200 FEET PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3, 218 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LOTS 4,5,12 AND 13 IN BLOCK "S" OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTUiG THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 4, BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, 150 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 200 FEET PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE WEST 230 FEET; THENCE NORTH 200 FEET PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, 230 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL .MAP NO. 1, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 1 OF PARCEL FLAPS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 330.00 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDIND BASE AND MERIDIAN. THE NORTH 15 FEET OF LOT "A", ACCORDING TO MAP OF ETIWANDA CACTUS ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 19 OF MAPS, PAGE 63, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFRCM THAT PORTION LYING WESTERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. 3, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK I OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. • EXHIBIT "B -1" (BASIN) n n a a C v a� �o D 0 "J9.93� N` p 'R € €j 5 E.Jrvon✓o G I 2 & Uk,: 7 $ S ny (ngoS ..W is S �5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 12044 (Earthen Channel) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as City, by and between said City and R.C. LAND CO. hereinafter referred to as the Developer. WITNESSETH: THAT WHEREAS, a temporary earthen channel shall be constructed for Tract 12044, being an Improvement Requirement of said City for said tract (the "Channel "); and, WHEREAS, the Developer shall maintain said Channel until such time as the Master Planned Concrete Channel and Day Creek Boulevard are constructed, and accepted by said City; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of maintenance security, as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be sufficient to guarantee continual maintenance of the Channel. . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer agrees to construct at Developer's expense the Channel consistent with the subdivision agreement for Tract 12044. 2. The Developer agrees to maintain the Channel, to the satisfaction of the City, at no expense to the City. The area required to be maintained is shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Such maintenance shall include the yearly regrading of the Channel bottom and side slopes, swails as required, cleaning of debris from the Channel, cleaning or culverts across Railroad and Base Lone Avenues, cleanup of debris from Foothill Boulevard and restoration of any shoulder area erosion, side slopes and barricades. All such maintenance shall be done prior to the first day of November each year. Developer shall further perform such regular maintenance as may be required for the normal operation of the Channel. In the event an emergency situation arises concerning the Channel, the City may require the Developer to perform reasonable maintenance activities within twenty -four (24) hours from the receipt of written demand therefore from the City. 3. Developer agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against any and all laibility arising from Developer's maintenance of the Channel as provided herein. • IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on dates set forth opposite their signatures. �� j DEVELOPER 191 c 8 Date Witness E h Date '7�,j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A [MUNICIPAL CORPORATION By 0a Jon D. Mikels, Mayor Attest: Da Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • Approved as to Form 1982 City Attorney .2. C 4. If after thirty (30) days following notification by City of deficient maintenance of the Channel, the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have • the right at any time to cause work to be done by any lawful means, and thereupon to use the hereinafter stated cash security and /or to recover from said Developer the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. Developer shall be billed for said costs and shall make restitution to the City within thirty (30) days of date of billing, and /or replace said cash securities used. Should Developer fail to make said restitution, within the time alloted, then the City will cause a lien to be filed, against said Developer on the real property described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, for said restitution plus any and all reasonable attorney fees. 5. This agreement shall remain in full force and effect from the date hereof until notice by City that construction of Concrete Master Planned Channel, replacing the Channel, and Day Creek Boulevard are completed and accepted for maintenance by said City. At that time said maintenance security shall be returned to Developer and this agreement shall terminate. 6. The maintenance security is to be furnished by Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement and shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney. The principal amount of said maintenace security shall not be less than the amount shown below: Maintenance Security Submitted: • Total Cash $5,000.00 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on dates set forth opposite their signatures. �� j DEVELOPER 191 c 8 Date Witness E h Date '7�,j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A [MUNICIPAL CORPORATION By 0a Jon D. Mikels, Mayor Attest: Da Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • Approved as to Form 1982 City Attorney .2. • OWNER: R.C. LAND CO. EXHIBIT A -1 AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER THAT PORTION OF THE WEST ONE -HALF OF THE NORTHEEST ONE- QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID WEST ONE -HALF, THENCE SO-08-38"W 2635.64 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE SAID WEST ONE -HALF TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE N89049114'N 175.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SAID WEST ONE -HALF; ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF VICTORIA STREET (30.00 FEET WIDE) AS SHOWN ON ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES PER MAP ON FILE iN BOOK 20, OF MAPS TO PAGE 1 THEREOF, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT • 175.00 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE N0008'38 "E ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 1764.93 FEET; THENCE N2053122 "W 472.44 FEET; THENCE N13 °45132 11E 106.20 FEET; THENCE N0008'38 "E 296.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 32, THENCE 589029'35 "E 175.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. • (• A%o.o1) I 7 0 1 EXHIBIT A -1 � i/i9h /ond A✓EY�dP e S� b .5e, r. 1.t/., Raw. n Y n� V �+ C s.em Al WA ter. 62, r /,u, .e m/ EXHIBIT A -2 r1 0''W..? JAMES J. HERRERO A 1rJ. 00 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER THAT PORTION OF LOTS 9 AND 10 C� ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20, PAGE 1 OF MOPS, RECC ;OED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TOGETHER WIT= THAT PORTION OF VICTORIA STREET ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS ON THE NORTH AND RAIL - ROA;; !,VENUE NORTH ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS ON THE SOUTH, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC! "ONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THE EAST LINE THEREOF BEI'.s DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEG;'NING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST ONE -HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE - QUAR -=R OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID VICTORIA STREET, THENCE 50008'44'W 1337.78 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WEST ONE -HALF TO A POINT ON THE SOL'T- LINE OF SAID RAILROAD AVENUE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN ON SAID ORANGE EMPI =,= ACRES MAP. L • • Fl,! ii • EXHIBIT A -2 ' Sec. '�Z, 7' /,U, iPlo �✓ �o oriel Ave -.zr .Liv !, • Y� ' I1J `l '--140 •� SUl V . Vi fir. aZ, �o oriel Ave -.zr .Liv !, • EXHIBIT A -3 OWNER: SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER THAT PORTION OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, SUCCESSOR -IN- INTEREST TO PACIFIC ELECTRIC COMPANY, BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 523, PAGE 200 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WITHIN THE EASTERLY 130.00 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. • • 9 • • EXHIBIT A -3 EA IM ' 2 J 11 1Ji v s 569'12'23'E 13000' PO. RAILROAD AVENUE NORTH NO'OR'M'E 10000' S0'02'4A'W 10000' RAIDROAD AVENUE SOIRH 0457 LINE, W. 112, S.W. VA. SEC 32,7. I N.,R.6 W • EXHIBIT A -4 OWNER: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER THAT PORTION OF LOT 25, ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH, ADJACENT TO SAID LOT ON THE NORTH IN THE CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20, PAGE 1 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST ONE - HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE - QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, THENCE S0008144 "W 1157.19 • FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 25; THENCE S89049'23 "W 98.71 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 25 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF ;TMENCE N6011'16 "E 1158.85 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 25 AND THE NORTHERLY EXTEN- SION THEREOF TO A POINT ON THE SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE S89012'23 "E 97.85,FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT - OF -WAY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTHERLY 20.00 FEET. • • 0 EXHIBIT A -4 EA57 LINE OF THE _ IN 111. SW 14 OF 5EG.32 T. I N., R.4 W. C "V A W.71' EXHIBIT A -5 OWNER: SOUTHERN SURPLUS REALTY CO. AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSE OVER THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1, IN THE CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 1 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST ONE -HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE - QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, THENCE S0015'40 "W 1560.83 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3 OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO.. 1; THENCE S89037152 1W 72.73 FEET ALONG THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 1; THENCE N0015'37"E 1560.82 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE - QUARTER; THENCE N89049'23 "E 72.74 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY • LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. • EXHIBIT A -5 72 74' �yn • A n 0 ti.. V� W Sa�'97'52 �r! '17273' .e&A6;,e Poi-Cel J • EXHIBIT 'B' • LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR EARTHEN CHANNEL THE EAST ONE -HALF OF THE WEST ONE -HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE- QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP I NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERN-ARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. • • 0 • • n •. E%H(3[T 'B' EARTHEN CHANNEL V �f �v v a ✓rc'�+ nib SfiErf �j 2WD 95 A Q 0 F O V O - - R867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA YAYR / YCN Y V E N.. R N A H E 10084 B169 RIZZO, ROBERT IUCBS 7314 Mlle.f, SHARUY 10:1.46 67:1. Ll A.Lr CF CALIF CITIES IGJ.l CI25 Ac II CN 1N AVEl AGCVCY Ic:MB 4115 VZ11jr J,1y �S 0 10c49 tdCC STATE CLMPINSAT 111::: 10190 Y41O S4N BON L' CC F40 fR U 10091 31190 tl+NK pF A -EkICA t.1o92 s]OJ Y'ST I °E`11AT 101 VCAR 0 I0C93 0% 11 ALTA AIR PE- I':S L AI. I.IU94 1775 _U'JJETI CHAAI -FS 101 45 S /Ji yL'W JA!FS 101:.' 51;9 PRI! ER, KAYIY IOG97 SiJ9 KFLtFR, RS ICn4B 9710 WFYBFR, MRS 10099 Sill ^ARSHALL, MELISIA 10110 5712 fNTkIRIH. J C 10 U11 S714 N= ISTFk• AVIV IJ 101 9714 STUART, D%V1U W 1.13 5715 EIMFK Srtll IU154 S116 POOP. ITEVE^. J 1'11)5 5711 H':4RURGER, MIME 10106 SP3r Fk-Y, JCSH IJ l.11 911) KRIG.T, LAURA Ir l'IM 520 LHSf. TIFFA%Y cn: I COI JI ?S Ol l+ C 70 [i 7J os ;s 1 4071 1470 1735 1 71 IN75 lYCO WARRANT RFMCILIATION 7/21/82 WARR JCUNNAL DISCOUNT AT RLFERENCE NET 6,241.50 51.50 328.01 345.82 2.BB5.R5 21.00 40.36 1,330.56 125.80 143.10 79.40 11.993.75 RACE 1 • ,r =0161 CITY CF RANCHO CU[AHONGA WARRANT RECONCILIATION 7121182 r� PARR M VEh l V E h O C R N A M E NARK JCUx\nt DISCOUNT NET VITT HkFE?F•rCE PAGE 2 15686 O-f CA4FPFLL. IOU1S 7/21/A2 160.00 995.00 • I56E1 } •5 CI'3F FGT �1•f 1oN S LIST 1'l /P) /Ll /91 50.00 [Sn40 P7 hi 1113, +1!F1: !�t CGIA(R[t 1121/12 28.46 IS..H9 1114 C•I�ISTLPOIA Ctif V• HARK 21.09 15690 2400 CI TR95 . 1(1 25 CU 7)21181 7111)92 106.19 1549t 2135 Cr'CA Cr;IA _L'ITLM'.. %a]A 1!21,102 229.27 111A7 IA/ (olf (YRISTI':t ,::4F6 1 /L! /H> 22.570.00 ls,53 15e 94 2519 4 "IU C2.IS J11 VFM1 :1.R NO. ,575 7121/92 4307.73 155 =5 5]'. LnC4 W.•r;i C,: VAlfd UIST 7731/11 7 /;l /3] 11u.1 15•,11 )81+1153 � U4rt'L..1 I;.0 7J?t /9 Lr020. 00 . 141.11 15693 211 I. 0• o:F 1ST SYC Cl.l. JUH 7121/42 77.45 1'.659 -T T. a J'tMA -Ur KEI 7121192 1400 IS Inc I+1Cl 2759 2759 )c 5. F1 PACIFIC CHALTEA t. TL0 7/211,32 7121182 275.00 76.32 11.85 111.2 ITCO uI AVr`lc IVTt CDFP "I AM 712I 1P2 174.24 !S /p3 114 RNL SYIE 7 /)I /A2 T /21/82 613.80 1 +L 5 33c2 ,.r ar:. I.S6E a 7/21111 300.90 IS 195 101 PF11 4A.SY J CO 11111A2 205.49 h lvn 33C1 TeL E4V1RL T- Sn11TS 1/21102 110.12 11T07 4115 F \NTASV A550 7 /7I 182 506.93 1+19x 1 +1:19 40'•0 t.n Fltt09A%, uLA?P G FI.g1HILL fAwCM1•:NFR SFRV 1 /11/x2 55.36 15110 1' ,111 All•. 4/)O Gtldi3t "1N11RG CC .i °[RAt TCCCPHP.VF CC T /,11/82 T12 92 2.9911.47 O 112 41 r. L +F 1a tKK T12IIP_ 200.90 1.713 .ITS '!.Asir JTRRY 9 112!!92 1)5.(,10 147.5C 15714 a..1 14�YG ntl,lti:.^.. IAAY 111t182 ZOO.00 ,1 1 4711 II:It1CAYKRICK Cf!L IhC 7/2114? 1,095 1 .7t7 477, S tiCY•T LU-Idl0. CU 7/21182 5.62 4r3fi3.T5 .• -� 15718 5110 l:H ^Lf.3 7/21/32 11.98 1:115 1S T_p 5'!11 11119 1•'1L CFYj PIT ICIAL 1'.11 TCVF at]d Cf FILIAL 712119_ 7 /It /n2 15.GC 38.5C I•� ?! SI -J Y'1. "]!. ?I IG,fsl HAUV:STti, 7/ ?1182 MCC IS.ZT 15123 °4GC 5511 S., a1" J. ISIS INC ULtV.f SAL ASPUALT CC IN 7/21191 7/21192 1T .LC 1a 313.3! 1,1)4 fl S.: J IE NII. J :, 7/ 11/92 221.2- 151!5 C5t'. Kt ILK SVC C:; RAY Lf10. VORATIOV 1/21/02 ll2t/R2 230.61 11172( 1 ;717 65,14 6611 Alaih Lihf K'UTS(N, CMNI T /21 /N2 7121/x2 579.1! LTD." IS 113 I'll K.Lt CYILN. 0('•r IE 7721192 94.0'. 11 fill 1+130 of 19 644C 1.0.171 CHrHtS LAIPU C('.SIvucr"7O.Y CO I/21/x2 3IO.64 IS 131 6'x.5 L..+ JACK }HIRIS 7111/82 11_3 /d- 1.202.04 15117 I57'3 .0 4715 IF t1:IR ARY F URIAH AFFAIR 7 /2l /AI s0. T/ 15134 L. r,'1 L CUT, 54ILY 7 /2l /A2 311.8! i 5I15 `F4! l,IHO -iHIVI CCN5TRt1CI0RS 7 /T1 192 4000.0( 1736 fk1i LOS .H. UI its TIC =S 7121/92 11.21 I 137 boa, 11'7,'. HICIAH 1121182 253.21 120.0( t1rle 15139 S29 7150 HC KA.r.rin9 P °, RCVERT HICHAlt L D" NIS 1121!92 7/21/!2 120.0( 15140 7313 MIL%F. }HAR';S 7/211:12 ^t 391.0( 15.9' 1,741 7421 ..all COPY SYSTEMS INC ••11'.11 ] / /AT It? 1a2 08.2( 1514+ 114'0 sllAcl1 '.171 Iflt /P? 240.01 15743 35744 i:t: 75;5 f.FCYf AT L1R 5 '2; rAY 1'.0 1 / ?1/h1 4951.!! 93.14 ]1115 -t46 Zt.:9 .?IV•RC" +A.(IE )/21 /A_ 7/21/92 250.01 I 7650 Cdl r. tI1OPIC SUPPLY )/'1/92 143.(1 15147 1574_ ?I f5 7.115 P:.CIF(I. C: MIUTV% V•IOE I,IUR V2TSS 7/ll /I7 19.111 l 5749 t';S tSP'bl. Pk ;C110 O R 11X1 ?qT 9T. 91 892.71 t'•750 COT! RAPID UAfA I'.0 T /LI /R2 1/ ?1/ 6. ?45.01 H751 C%5 REtfL. 1OVTt(`-FNT. AN ^2 !SAT 2111 Fa 1':0.1 C5. JA'.ICC ?fill 7!11 /97 50.01 151]3 114• L LI:.IS [1110. P -V llill92 7121181 200..11 15154 H'Cd RC-I(y(I JA Y r[. 11,1121 179,21 ,A 1',755 11!11 911.) A:,!), 14vt Uf ACnA T / ?Irll 67. tl1 t•. I`.1 Pen) 114'. 13'41!. vA1l S• r. AS G.wl If lt/"! 4352.6' L.ISn 141r'.• .p ...0 y 10: Ct :.A'1I411. ) /1t/H2 42.0'. s IS 1:9 9 P.111 -,AN L ➢c r'1 H: ^.I Cf ,J'-.T l /)l /R) • 36. Di • PAGE 2 ,I RF6T CITY I:NICUO CUCAMUNGA J NAi;R Y VE V E N 0 0 R N 4 M E 15760 8435 U 15!61 F445 176 PS l; 15164 9550 151 F51I W 15766 9LIU IS760 PF10 15168 3C .� 15759 E.tl5 170 E646 15111 . 151.2 011c0 0 3 15173 6111 1 714 8754 t715 J`7 11715 n531 ,I 16111 540 RANIIANT RECUNCIl1 ON PARR Ji.0 nl;rt1 I1A:F CEF ERENCF FINAL TOTALS 71211 62 DISCOUNT NFT 199.614.42. 19.93 9.637.85 396.00 9.90 0. no 1.327.19 147.56 7.951.30 345.957.42 VArj& 3 r. ' P I 3� a. ,,jj�� ._ i '!N f r. EF ..,. - y, a' 'i'+i:•''.� 15i�a3'•'/u':�6 S7Yi3fFir�.4 iE�'in ? {nd .•-H`�M:-:�[M.. d. F�.yl.�.�: Oct YiW Id•N� ..... �. ! COPYw ..n- ...,.,..rr..r+.. .. u..r_ -r_E :�:. APPOCAT;ON FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE EKENSE(S) fe: Depvnmmr 01 AlmM1alit 4rempr Cenlrol 19D1 Rove+ey jp[rommrv, CblA.93818 �'n - A`ID4nIL. ^.9 uu.w.•.•..,...x . n... Th. rndaupnrd h ... by ePPlm Fa Cann. dumb.d or, (.4 -n 1. RPF(S) OF LICENSE {3) FILE NO. CB,,Sr RECe`— E No POGp[ � G�"7J .ti• u.20 TC fw l.i'tis �1 -CC Applied vndn 4... UDN � GEOGRAPHICAL CODE - Der. Iu R. NAMES) Of AFMCANT(S) lwnp Emm� ' 3. IIPE(S) Of Th:N5ACHON(S) Ww rl M .M..• .41,E non. NI v.. - FEE LIC, TYPE _ In Mrm Al— ♦ r,a....r :,... ww. 111 e•. M rmrw .nl.w.n ,�, yr ...rn.• ]r r�M. M .rM.r -. n er M,•r•..nn n. n.Yr.n I v.u.r r ' „ DroO nt3e; IA APRICA ^` " SIGN 1 A"� SIGN MEAE AE `�I ✓"'Y .. —c, APPLICATION BY TBANSTEBOB 1, N, . eE S.". , (.. "fLl�,f•.�i.",]r0n.(±v r,. W, 1t�.r�� V..>rt•N .. ... S. labGen vl 0eoeen -N.mhn vM Su.., Sbi'I 3:culine Ave. .. ...... . Clry end EiP Cen. Cwrnry C-1 CIT=. n... -. TOTAL 3 6 :`hP..m n Ll.e md, 7. A,. Pr.Ma, IneJ. .._n...r r,r.... r{1 -�7J T'Ih cn. I,m,r•R YOL: ...r b—<vmmrd DI a I.lenyi and SvMr Ir...rl nwn ' Pnrn. I cn1 PI rb gaIinee> of AlwM1oli, Ih. r rpvlelienr el the Dep." orrmenl per. on 8e1 SPrirr FlrlPa Th,, Llrv; !'or Ugmrpnrm UN 0nly Almrhw p Euwded no ite. ) .. n t,. .:... _. . . . ........ ..... CORES MApfD .- 7/2/42 -- (j P, .... t.n r P i nu • _ 1JVa e., .. P > I! .. _ . 11. EvPla.n o "'YE]' <r ry :lem> V er rV on en brle[Amenr -ni[A Meb b. oeem.tl Parl of in, opPll[allan. • ill. TPPIp n, apn s (v) any'm no9er mpleyetl ....... .... � IA,I. al r: o.ble ar [ou,. a mn r O o�.ven, ere IF) Th. F. ••ill n r Per o M.iblolid eny e,' tA. olhrhe Alalahol. a Can rol 13. STALE OF CALIFORNIA Cbonly PI .'_� �LIC;3':_. ^.O .., Del. �/� V ,V ' Ww rl M .M..• .41,E non. NI v.. - NrMr. _ In Mrm Al— ♦ r,a....r :,... ww. 111 e•. M rmrw .nl.w.n ,�, yr ...rn.• ]r r�M. M .rM.r -. n er M,•r•..nn n. n.Yr.n I v.u.r r ' „ • IA APRICA ^` " SIGN 1 A"� SIGN MEAE AE `�I ✓"'Y .. —c, APPLICATION BY TBANSTEBOB S. SUIT OF CALIIOANI4 Covnly W $Jp L'nr:ucuinri D>'. (.. "fLl�,f•.�i.",]r0n.(±v r,. W, 1t�.r�� V..>rt•N .. ... on 8e1 SPrirr FlrlPa Th,, Llrv; !'or Ugmrpnrm UN 0nly Almrhw p Euwded no ite. ) .. n t,. .:... _. . . . ........ ..... CORES MApfD .- 7/2/42 -- (j P, .... t.n r P i nu • _ 1JVa e., .. P > I! .. _ . • on 8e1 SPrirr FlrlPa Th,, Llrv; !'or Ugmrpnrm UN 0nly Almrhw p Euwded no ite. ) .. n t,. .:... _. . . . ........ ..... CORES MApfD .- 7/2/42 -- (j P, .... t.n r P i nu • _ 1JVa e., .. P > I! .. _ . o "i h'�1�° a a4 • L ta'e " SyuRi2E S�oppr/.14 10 F✓r22A RoyAL /19 a 2I Se.a P .toe.,r Kuia(- sAepS CI :1 GIEVAO� SeEtkc SiAnoJ .- 13nut:� bet N _ 65 et e�' aY eY o "i h'�1�° a a4 • L ta'e " SyuRi2E S�oppr/.14 10 F✓r22A RoyAL 5 • /19 a 2I Se.a P .toe.,r Kuia(- sAepS CI :1 GIEVAO� SeEtkc SiAnoJ .- 13nut:� bet N _ (/x Z• ^. .Co:fAC /s Lo ciiTED o.0 tl� SourFj b/De of %aASCL/.aJC �u ST wErT• I 'oG eP�,veL /rgM1/ 5'7LceT w.ry.nJ 7-l� SuNQ/2c S.hoFP.N� C'c,u—c/P. �i Is of its �vNCa� -/ (��oPc1Rry ,EI/tzT/ /v On?TI of ICJ /5 �Ij�o�PRT4 (LES%- OF (PoPP12r�/ IS 5 • . T Cri t,,#-sr COPY. �N1,mm..�.L•::r_..r ::.:.:..per. APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE UCENSOS) 6: Dp I of Akebolk B..r Cweral IPoI &— d.y S ^ni S-.. Cdl, 9NIR Th. xNnlgnN MubY epprn. le. Rmxr ✓ennbd er letloo: 1. WHERE OF LICENSf(SI FILE NO. F•RE PaL.. .1 : "'.I'm is 'wIliE E YI]fO :L Li - APPS.d wdn3ee, 2,1044 ❑ fff.6— Dm.:-= GtIGGOm RfCO �i NO. V GFOGRAFNICAI COOS 7 Derr I..d }. NAMEIS) OF "KICANT(S) FF., Famr ' ERKII.. Dom ' IIOr u1:6 i1CC �: SO:IQ :ItfO 5. TYPE(S) OF TRANSAC(IONISI FEE EEC. TYFE .. ..'. .:... Yor.: a:. ........ ....... 3 9$0.000 Al ' " "' ❑ p•n.wrdFn.a E J1, K i r Peep N a NemCel W.naystcr OT 20 .. 3. lxaien el W9nno-NVmber wq Sma 6793 —79th Street cky ane E: °.0 °d.0 E°"�.1 o. - a. +.aaga 997 >0 TOTAL 3 9500 d. If p-.. DT.. r. An.rmmolr, ,, —el n- , Yes B. MdAw9 Addnrr ICI dMr nr XemkSl-Numbe arrd `rre C, 917u3 • Ta��; "'"" 9. Nen yet e..r b..n.err.kM of o kbnyl r 10. Ne.e Yev Nebmd on] a rM pro.wm. of IM Ak.Ao& NC S i,1. A. AN MI or rpvMNmm el M. Oeplmmnl p.n ..111,5 ro rA. A.M RJ 11. GIN;.. 4 V °nm« ro inmr e w 10 en m onotM1m.m -hkh droll b. d..mM purl °I IM1ir °pplimnen. '12. Applimnr 19,11, (e) IMI °ny —Far .mpl.pd In on..1. Im .... d N-- will M1m. WE IA. 9v°lifrmlmm al o Irnnu., end ` rol IMI M ..ill ner deter. er Twle er pmmb Ie b. fi.I..d .-I 1: 1E. 11.Irlenr el Ib. Mmboll< Bnereg. Cemrel Ad. I3. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Caw1 Y o ... 1 bOn .. .. .... 011. ....._..... _.- .. 4• W u • 111 F _ rhw rn•r.r�ri•nrm•n.wr. r..n° r. xM.rww. M ' w.q .00.•,1.0,1 rn. M rrN.r .•rr n �.mrN..•« wllw r+ Anry r rnarw rlr M wr rnnl...rN.,...r. ..r F ww..r. \. ,1,100 M rr.M.nr w M1r.xr w\ rn rrrwre r.u.r. 14. APPLICANT r,�N [I.�.r. :J .. SI ON HERE ��' m ......... .. r ...... ............. - ._. .1C �rin - ••.• 2 APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 3. STATE OF CALIFORNIA C.-I, of GCFIE JC^ i1::0 CI r rry..w w°r.rrrn...r N M r Mr.n I.. m.nrN.. rrNn..r w ry 0.00•,10 ..n m nrw...r.ry r. nr erwwr -r 'r nre.w w xr.rrnw. Ir. wn rur xwrlx 0µ,10.r. ..r w - ..er...r nrw rN ., Id NameNl 11 bumeHN b. Signewrchl al UnnxaO It OT.nm Nvmb.r01 OOT i.H oM <o p cod.. .,.o C. ,F plan —ELL EN 1,•m Wdln nit.11 rhll I.;,, rnr Onn.lmrnl L'.e Only o ✓cr 0i ,.ttonioy .. •• A ❑ dd E.< nol "Teal OOT i.H oM <o p cod.. .,.o C. ,F plan —ELL EN 1,•m Wdln nit.11 rhll I.;,, rnr Onn.lmrnl L'.e Only .. •• A ❑ dd E.< nol "Teal )919 tto nc) 7/1/92 ....... ' " "' ❑ p•n.wrdFn.a E J1, K i r Peep N eidG rJ�j® Hfa 8A+ en/ a>k /�sv9 %K� Tu/MpMY 6�5r GeN�RA'L F�LRti b Ale /9 ✓16��No0'D '- �oNiNy > A1o2r( .F ?rzapfhry �'t�- l-/-S °o Fn-c r of�j�feaP�nr�+ Q 3 So4t� mL fnopa/Li `i C-� 0 - f fIEO eidG rJ�j® Hfa 8A+ en/ a>k /�sv9 %K� Tu/MpMY 6�5r GeN�RA'L F�LRti b Ale /9 ✓16��No0'D '- �oNiNy > A1o2r( .F ?rzapfhry �'t�- l-/-S °o Fn-c r of�j�feaP�nr�+ Q 3 So4t� mL fnopa/Li `i C-� 0 9 is • / TMV nV D AATOTTA OTTO AMnATnA STAFF REPORTn4i6 1 0 ' U 1977 July 21, 1982 TO: City Council City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: Authorization to Execute Building Maintenance (Janitorial Service) Agreement for City Offices (9320 "C" and 9340 "A ", "B ", "C ", "D ", d "E" Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California) and Lions Park Community Center (9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga California). The attached building maintenance agreements are for the City offices and Lions Park Community Center. Our present contractor (Walden Dahl Maintenance), who has been with the city since October, 1980, has indicated he will provide the same level of service as in the past - -at no rate increase over the next two fiscal years. This cost is totally $1375.00 monthly for both sites, and the price is still below the second low bidder (when it was bid in September, 1980). The contractor during his two years service has maintained a high standard of service; we have experienced no security problems; he is a local (Rancho Cucamonga) business with a City business license; he is bonded, and has no complaints on file with the Better Business Bureau. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the attached building maintenance agreements be executed by the City Clerk. The $1,375.00 monthly is within the budgeted amount approved by the City Council for building maintenance. &Z Enclosure 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into in the State of California by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter called the CITY, and zf�//��a���� ,��K , hereinafter called CGI TRACTOR. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the CITY wishes to contract for building maintenance services at its City Offices located at 9320 "C" and 9340 "A,B,C,D & E" Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga; AND, WHEREAS, the CONTRACTOR has signified a willingness to provide building maintenance services at the above cited City Offices. IT IS THEREFORE agreed by the CITY and the CONTRACTOR as follows: FIRST: The CONTRACTOR agrees to perform the work herein set forth: SECTION A: City Offices ARTICLE I - Daily Maintenance • 1. Clean all restrooms to include, but not limited to cleaning of sinks, mirrors, toilets, urinals; restock paper and soap goods (provided by CONTRACTOR) 2. Sweep and damp mop all hard surface floor areas. (Entry points and kitchen /rest areas) 3. Empty all trash containers. 4. Clean and /or vacuum unusually soiled carpet areas. 5. Remove debris from ash urns at entryways. ARTICLE II - 4leekly maintenance 1. Vacuum all carpet areas. 2. Dust office surfaces, excluding desk tops, but to include window blinds, room dividers, file cabinets, boot: cases, etc. 3. Clean counter at entry points. 4. Dust and apply polish to counter table and wooden furniture in City Manager's Office. Agreement Page Two 5. Clean window surfaces at all entry points. ARTICLE III - Twice Monthly Maintenance 1. Clean all outside window surfaces. ARTICLE IV - Monthly Maintenance 1. Clean all inside window surfaces. 2. Scrub and apply finish to all hard surface floors. SECTION C: Miscellaneous Maintenance ARTICLE I - Special Minor Maintenance 1. Minor plumbing such as replacing of washers during regular daily maintenance. 2. Minor plumbing such as unplugging of toilets • during regular daily maintenance. SECOND: In consideration for the above services, the CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR the sum of ✓IJS. =° per month. THIRD: The CONTRACTOR agrees to supply his own consumable cleaning materials to perform this contract. FOURTH: This Agreement shall be on a month to month basis through June 30, 1984, FIFTH: Either the CITY or the CONTRACTOR may terminate this Agreement at any time with written notice to the other party. SIXTH: The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, hold harmless and define the CITY, its officers, agents, and employees against all liability, claims, losses, demands and actions for injury to or deaths of persons or damage to property arising out of or in consequence of this Agreement. • • Agreement Page Three For CONTRACTOR 7_ 8Z Date • For City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road Unit "C" ancho Cucamonga, California 0 Name /Title • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into in the State of California by and between the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter called the CITY, and Ldn6"�- , hereinafter called CONTRACTOR. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the CITY wishes to contract for building maintenance services at its Lions Park Community Center, located at 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. AND, WHEREAS, the CONTRACTOR has signified a willingness to provide building maintenance services at the above cited Community Center. IT IS THEREFORE agreed by the CITY and the CONTRACTOR as follows: FIRST: The CONTRACTOR agrees to perform the work herein set forth SECTION A: Lions Park Community Center ARTICLE I - Daily Maintenance • 1. Clean all restrooms to include, but not limited to cleaning of sinks, mirrors, toilets, urinals, restocking of paper and soap goods (provided by CONTRACTOR). 2. Sweep and damp mop all hard surface floor areas. 3. Empty and clean all trash containers. 4. Clean sinks and counter surfaces in gallery east, gallery west, and lobby rooms. 5. Vacuum carpet areas. 6. Clean and wipe down all surfaces in kitchen. 7. Refill all paper and soap dispensers as needed (materials to be provided by CONTRACTOR). S. Sweep entry walkways and east steps. 9. Remove debris from ash urns at entryways. ARTICLE ti - Weekly Maintenance 1. Vacuum all carpet areas twice weekly, Tuesday and Friday. Agreement Page Two 2. Dust surfaces, excluding desk top, but to include window blinds, window frames, counters, etc. 3. Clean window surfaces at all entry points twice weekly, Tuesday and Friday. ARTICLE III - Twice Monthly Maintenance 1. Clean all outside window surfaces. ARTICLE IV - Monthly 11aintenance 1. Clean all inside window surfaces. 2. Vacuum draperies in Forum stage area. ARTICLE V - Special Maintenance 1. Shampoo the floor carpet throughout the facility at a time to be scheduled four times annually. r1 LA 2. As needed ar once every three months, scrub and apply finish to lobby and gallery east floors. • SECTION C: Miscellaneous Maintenance ARTICLE I - Special Minor Maintenance I. Minor plumbing such as replacing of washers during regular daily maintenance. 2. Minor plumbing such as unplugging of toilets during regular daily maintenance. SECOND: In consideration for the above services, the CITY agrees to pay the CONTRACTOR the sum of 4c5- per month. THIRD: The CONTRACTOR agrees to supply his own consumable cleaning materials to perform this contract. FOURTH: This Ayreeiar.nt shall be on a month to month basis through June 30,19E4. FIFTH: Either the CITY or the CONTRACTOR may terminate this Agreement at any time with written notice to the other party. SIXTH: The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, hold harmless and define the CITY, it's officers, agents, and employees against all liability, claims, losses, demands and actions for injury to or deaths of persons or • damage to property arising out of or in consequence of this Agreement. Agreement Page Three For CONTRACTOR: D—.2L lbYlut e — 7 -7— 82— Date For City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road • Unit "C" /' Rancho Cuca4nga, California v U� Date 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 21, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician GAO GLCANp n9 2 � n c 1 1977 SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF BONDS AND AGREEMENT FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 13235 VICTORIA AVENUE - MURILLO Mr. and Mrs. Murillo are submitting the attached bonds and agreement to guarantee the construction of off -site improvements for their project located at 13235 Victoria Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting the above described bonds and agreement submitted. Respectfully subm' ted, LBH:EK:bc Attachments • VICTORIA Par. 1 ni Par. 20,t 3) AI 33 M PROJECT SITE STREET ! — I 134 2 w Par, 4 Q ql n IAC tt( \trq CITY OF RA \CI 10 CUCA,MONGA r A ENUTWEERI \C UIVISM >1 VICINITY AIAP Jul An page I 134 h q IAC ]�a 19A An t36i 1 d6 9 Q Li 4 A AL .M /L M I k l tt( \trq CITY OF RA \CI 10 CUCA,MONGA r A ENUTWEERI \C UIVISM >1 VICINITY AIAP Jul An page • RESOLUTION NO. '' - , � �_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR A SINGLE - FAPIILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 13235 VICTORIA AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on July 21, 1982 by Alfredo and Clara Murillo as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifi- cally described therein, and generally located at 13235 Victoria Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Ordinance No. 58; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and • said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Flikels, Mayor • Bond J 10:3594 Premiums 11.00 C117f OF RANCHO CTCANOXA MPROVEMEAT AGREEMENT RNOV ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and pools - tions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal c - pwratioa, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and AL FRFa AND CI ARA MDRRILLO hereinafter referred to as the Developer. WTNESSEIH: THAT, HNEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has cequeered ap Pr oval by the City of, a single - family residence an accordance with the provisions of the report of the Community Develop eat Director thereon, and any amendments thereto; located at 13235 Victoria Avenue. end, HHFAEAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by maid developer prior to granting the final aopreval of the d.velopmeny and _ 1WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed in be equivalent to prior completion of said requirepents for the purpose of securing said approval; NON, RIEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the city and the Developer as follows: 1. The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all improvements described on page 3 hereof within one (7) Year frcm the date hereof. 3. The term of this agreement shall be on (e 11 v ;al, commencing on the date of a e cution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on thedo, following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said tens has been extended as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provi- sions of this agreement, In writing out leas than fame treks prior to the default date, and including A statement of clrcmnstances of necessity for additional elms. To c .slderatinn of such request, the City r serves the right to review the provisions hereof, including conitrucrion standards, ose catimate, and sufficiency of the improvements i,ity, and to requite ed]ustmenls thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. .. RCEIIA \ C 4. If the Devi In per fails or neglects to comply with he pr ov ilium of this Jgrrf•nIel, the Pity shall have the right at any time to cause said provi- atoev to be completed by any lawful m and thereupon to recover from mid Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense Incurred in so do t ng. 5. F.ncrnachment permits shall be Obtained by the Developer fren the office of the City Engineer prior to start of a work wirhIn he public right of way, and the deveinpar :hall combat such vnrk in full c mDl lance with tb.• rcgW itlocn c [ai—t! the. m. Non -cum Plilcec Mde reatilL In stopping of the vnrk by the City, and assv ;..menu If the panal[iry provided. 4. N,blic right Of way imprnvrmept vnrk rscairad shall be one..tiered In nnfarnnnrc with .tpprnveJ lm Pravemenl 11.1-11. Standard Speriflcntinns, and Standard Dravmfl and UIY special .- 1,nd-veata there[n. Con s[nlrt lgn .ball fnrluda any [ranvitlon; and /a1 othl•r ineldenral work deemed nacesxary for dr,,,tia • ,, public aaf.,i. .. RCEIIA \ C n f•.5. Bond ;!1023584 Premium:111.00 Pt,a _ • IBPRJb'm IUJ AGREL:'!E:iT 7. Work dnoe vitBm crcis Liu;; aets 1+.111 be diliµco tl;' p ued m coap[e- Linn: t1le City $11,711 ha:'e One ri D!11 L• complete A .mdn all Work in the art of unjusWicd dolly 1n tor.; !eLin ;, a+el ro r all wst and rotor red fr.. 'he Devoloper and /or his rontric LOr by any lawful B. Ths Ik ve toper I;1111 b sibll f rep L¢ t, eaen re lncatjr, , or r - val n or, caopenenr of an, I ... 5.mion ..'III wstem in conflict with clo, ren wired Work to Lhe satisfaction of the City Eng!neer and Lhn es,ner Of too wiLer system. 9. Thu Pumpinppr shall be re siblc for ttm,l of all loose• ,Ik and aline, debris from the pnh lip ri khLno :ultia, from nark done oo the adja- cent property or vitllfn said right of�uay. 10. 'Mc Developer e:m Ll Punt a maintain park —. trees as directed by the Camn+miry Devnlopcont Direct.'. Ii. The imprnvem:nt securiLY to be fircni�hed by the Develnper to 6onrantee enm;dennn of the terms of Lha 1111,lrnt 111,111 Le Sob!ecL In the approval of the City Actm'ne, The lIlrliPal ,lmeont of said improvement security small be not less elan the amo eat shown heiov: V1 RJ%VENT SRC'.Ri T\ SUBMITTED; Faithful Performance Bond j5,559.00 TYPE SURETY /AGES- PRPICIPAL AINE;.i Material and tabor Bond $2,775.00 • 10 !:r -SC55 !1 :Ri: P, the "".'s here ca have c see chic, pre scoots co io d v,•C:ICed ind n rvlitlped •vcth .111 f o maLrttes r , lad by law in L!,e dates I" in It opposite the it si9la eums: DEVELOPER DATE: 1) c 'CC �— BY: �_(.. -. // - DATE: 7-1,) ..F a WITNESS: _ DATE: __ CITY OF "O10 CUCI01ONCA, CALIFORS1A a mnni6f,il corporation BY: - • `b11'DR AiTCC is __�_ CITY CLCRII D.v;:: • Bond ^102.584 Page 3 meio,:111.00 clr 0- RXNC10 Clv.1110, caaT "CCTta: ,cD ;0::o • ENC'nu.;CUENT PEM IT —E SCIIEDi1LF. (Attach to "Inspector's cc p}'') DATE: 4115/82 FER.M[T %0. COMPLTED BY Barbara Kral! File Reference Parce! 3 P.M. 4550 City Drawing ND.s 761 SOTS: Does not include 1.11,11 fee for vItlin6 p ,eir or pavement replace - mCnt dsp,ila. 73235 Victoria CONETBDCEIO:f COST EBTPM.ITE d L. CONSTRUCTION COST $51047100 CONTtrccfYCr COSTS e01 in TOT.::, fnySipCCT;n': COSTS 5.55C.00 FAIiN 116 MFOMM:C.. 60 :41) 1100:) 5:55000 L \CaR AND :LITEFIAI. BOND (50C) 2177SICO ENI;INFERINL INSPFr.T10 M. ':V is (FEE SCUM LE) YO:a'YRNT.ATNU BOND (6ASIO N/A :'NTT I UNIT 115T S I C so r.r. I Ils I L. 1. A 11 00 P.C.r:. In" 111•.. r,. F. io ( min) L.P. L. F. I" I C.C.. q,dc, " P. c.c. B; devnik 460 1. F. I. 5 805.00 6" nnw Ancrnach 241 1. 1. Z. 00 b I 7. i0 o.r A:. I s (marl S. F. Strc•c Evcaru 1.n 260 C.Y. 1.50 3e L -.M rt ed E,:1 anA men[ Pry ra[:�n of Su`::r o4r I S.F. r, I" "11nn n. c. r ronsl �as A.C. (91.0 In 1300 m Tel V r (n 4:Pr nn .,o') I11, Yu 0 Paco, A.C. I[r"n,h) .S.:'. I" 'hi ,k A.r. N,lly 207S S.F. In 6C4 a l Ir{' a !: n: a d.. 1d -nct 1,11 ::. Q. ca Grade EA. !:!Biqa 11111 V.1111c t rade EA. < _ r.... F.A. 900.00 800.70 G1. i t I 1 I 1 I I I 1 d L. CONSTRUCTION COST $51047100 CONTtrccfYCr COSTS e01 in TOT.::, fnySipCCT;n': COSTS 5.55C.00 FAIiN 116 MFOMM:C.. 60 :41) 1100:) 5:55000 L \CaR AND :LITEFIAI. BOND (50C) 2177SICO ENI;INFERINL INSPFr.T10 M. ':V is (FEE SCUM LE) YO:a'YRNT.ATNU BOND (6ASIO N/A Mnd #1013594 Pre.deo ;I11.00 FAITHFUL PERFM'ANCE BOND WHEREAS, the Citv Co jCietloOf && eaia q,.,flo archo Cucamonga, State of California, and thereinafter designated as "principal••) have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated , 19 , and identified as protect sinnle- famija residence at 13215 Victoria Av . as Tereby re {erred to and marls a part hereof; and, V.H-RE S, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of sate agreement. AmweNO ,rTHEP2FORE, w,., the principal and as surety, are held and f irpay bound unto the 01ty o. Ran c. ^.p Cucamonga ih¢r einaf ter called "City'•) , in tie penal sun of iii¢ Thousand five Hundred ft�f• money o; to Vni tee Stater, or th¢ payment of witch sun well a truly tq be mad ;, we bind ourselves, our heats, successors, exscu- tors anal a'miris tratcrs, jointly and severally, firmly by these • presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, ad, inistraters, successors o: atni,r., shall in all thin,.. stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, cor',- tron. and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration there.', made as thernin provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the nanstr therein spec- ified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meanicg, and shall and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, Jas therein stipoietcd, then this oblica Con shall beccne null and void; otherwiso, it shall be and rena in in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount soecified therefor, there shall be included costs 3rd sonable exnenses and Zees, including reasonable at- torneys fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obl:ga do n, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judea.ent rendered. The surety hereby sbipulaten and agree. that no chance, ex- tension of time, ul b±m Lion or addition to the terms of the agrnerent or tp t. h'2 wort: to be peefonmod thereunder or the spec- " ' acconpary:nq the same shall in on},ise affect its onliyations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any sue': r, h.y:g e, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terns of the agreement me to the work or to the repeat ica t =.ens. HITTICGC W119REOF, this instrument has ben d• l; executed 19 tyc principal and surety above nared, on Sunx �' Ar.E23 c Amvi�t 5 n_[� Ins a Cor ?an� ay: Jmin c, auva ye dtromee -in -Tact • Bond 91023M4 Premiuma t 1.00 IASOR AND " +1T_RIAL ?:E:1 RO::O WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and Alfredo and Clam 9nrillp (hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated . 19 and identified as pro- ject singT. , residence at 132at 13235 Victoria Ays is hereny referred to and mace a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re- quired before entering upon t r performance of the work, to rile a good and sufficient paymen.t bond with the City of Rancho Cuca- monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 13 (commencing cwith Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. 9 \ _. -_ -_ _. _._ d=am ec Fiae[J' In_eu r.n_L,np.,n,L_ (7 / p BY:JJ111 Im E. Sava 3e A[tu roe)' -in-Fa c[ RCE24 NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as d corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamoncs and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material - men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure •— ...�., ... _....... .. in the sun of Two Thousand, Seven Hundred Esventy Five • Dollars •or catersals furnished or lf any kind, or for acur ` s due under abor thereon o -. the Dnempldyment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said screty will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the a -cunt hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable exoduses and fees, including reasonable at- torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcina such oblication, to be awarded and fix ed by the court, and to be cased as costa and to be included in the judurent therein rendered. It fs hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with 5ection 3083) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. Tho surety herehy stipulator and' agrees that no change, ex- tension of Ginn, alteration or addition to the terns or said aq :••�mont or the sPeciEica tip ns arcompanytng the same shall in any nan:wr affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hero - by wirie notice of any such change, extension, alteration or ad- dition. IN W1T::`:DS t111E.'i :O F, this instal ^ant has been duly executed \ the principal and surety i 0,u, named, on Junu 15, 14 9 \ _. -_ -_ _. _._ d=am ec Fiae[J' In_eu r.n_L,np.,n,L_ (7 / p BY:JJ111 Im E. Sava 3e A[tu roe)' -in-Fa c[ RCE24 .RMNE..STSL'RETY L\YCRA]'CE COMPANY 6301 Oiscolo M1 Aweup Suvr J04 , Woodland 11.1h. Calrjomn 91367 u 02 5 S Q Q )e"jEwco , ill: 101.1111 1- POWER OF ATTORNEY a KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT] That AMWEST SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Ooes hereby make. ConalMb and anoeml GARY R. PETERSON- JANICE DRUEZ- OYANNE A. CRAHAN- SHIPLEY PAIVA- CHERYL BUNNAND -JOHN E. SAVAGE -SCOTT D. ANSCNULTZ- MARGIE WILSON - CATHERINE THOMPSON VICTORIA BUSHN ELL -ROBIN J. FIGHT r and lawlul Polarnry 111 .n Fas, sell' lull a.—, and sinks.... V, and on Iwnatf of she Coal as Fu..... eo rrr[utr ,rd delwer and shoo 11, its or I,e cnmrynY llnelo.l a teal n rellurrcd. bond,, androal," 1. Rcov awed... or OIM1tr W...... aa.Wnan, m;n! nalarr instinct a, lonewt CONTRACT, LICENSE, PERMIT, COURT& MISCELLANEOUS BONDS TO $250,000.00 and la bmd AMWEST SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY thereby, aml,II of the,tlt of all Alloal mNu, a.,,-a, la all rrenv III '1.1 and tonbrmW Ton annmnlmenl.1 ande uelf, ad L, Isnociir of 11, lellowol, noon, :he, nm of 111 By Laws .1 11, C"meany, w nch are now .a full lore and 11111, A IfIc all, Sell T of lac BY Lm, 61 AMW EST SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY Ton Pown of .Varney n o-wo and nl by latn..:'..mder and bV "1 autnsill y of ire'.".'a, aulul.onr Ilan led by IM board Ol discloses 01 AMW EST SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY at a mllnnq lull nerd w Dmemhn 15. I975 RESOLVED that the Ixaidem or any ^Ice raludem, m canrun[Imn W.In In, secretary of any sedfili,ebr III, any Itel mneyfmall or gern wan southerly av deon.l or Ior l.n Inernloodent led-nn, the .an onown or ratio Card for and M n.narl of IM cemMnY Io eaetu•e and lel.ver and also, In! I of the clam Paav la cons, Larat'sakmav, rcc,c.,.a..., sold turely!l it salon, al all Y.nly, a Nod Chown m 1Itral any wm sooner or 11,1 .1111 sort mole am' nowt of nmin!v rvtnounr Granite to mm tenon RESOLVED FURTHER Inat anv hand. under uk 119 ✓corm Lance, as mrnVtnoo oMr9abon,hall oe uLl and Lord,, a non l ne camnny Ilw "Road nvn.a•a.....Ia,nvwct colooent fine. aMn.d artificial Of nod be cal the anv uc na'y'w Aril Gym a•nani m an, v,I,a,en a"' .1 fil of annifi"I Utnary. an d munD,.an.l A.0 l o l an vet he,ea,o-,f oat aco:, ollso eJ a;lonry I o last o, a¢nl IrnlwmdWr..eanlandn"w Wat.e M n..... Uv.". rymoreavornevt rn last or fair's E., andw III Ine bmnf of ln. mTmnv Iflen[el by Toe serer nl stred be she Call to wcn RESOLVED FURTHER ded Ine Pao+nar al anv aulnonstd olbctr led 11, I-al al Ine 111 may Ut all•e.l M factal to anv tower as IIn rev at Iron I Islas thereof Athol act the t,eculon, and d.l ve,v of • any he d. underl a 1."9, recd l,gIIIt or of Mr 1,oflarre sill yslacal al Ins [anal add such Manhunt find ven' when e0.1.I an nave 11, tame Irl and effect ac nwan manual, III .,a IN WITNESS WHEREOF AMWEST SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY nn uuwO POe ornenn•o ne Gavel Py •ts Growl . 111.1. and dl cnnolal. I'll ;o lr nr.n:rrn I'n.ro n, t I):'1 day a, '' 19 _1 y� FST SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY All 61 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGE LES -„ On inn l-Mar of t ^� ".TI`^C A , 19$ .ennna I y cane force asst Ri ^haM r'. and - mr l.awrno tar ;rvr .r,dwdrS I'd co vn al AMWEST SURETY INSURANCE COV PANY.CALIFORNIA wnn.rrtul.d;1, lbnrt onnumeot and ;Otv acn acMnowlel9rd me ev:upnn of ?t cane. And o•l, bvm,jd, str, ddundr,lIdr,e,nd ur ,its P.uaof Inn[an.ol.r.mnv lamle'l 1111 w,am Ol,v. ­duly Is as mn1.1,cn wam•le Isoroman l,"I mr floor vof "IIlonaof nv.ao,t al aid /mL•Irnalion w hopuANN[LG �maL �, (SEAL) ��/t (I IIn... -•- j C .14mn_an to. n, El_F_; LOe4:6. —K L STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGFL ES -ft CERTIFICATE I,......rroanra e,AMWESTSURETY INSURANCE COMPANY 1Glle- ec.rnmumn Do HERE BY CERTIFY mat ln- ,nanmayI'd attached Plate, of AUnwer remumm lmllmre ndn oflire .oktd I'd lurinrrmnrr, IIrAr tb nroriunn, nl ;nr By Laxv nl Idle cnmoanv anJ ;ne RNalunont nl IIn bOara.11d�re[lon vet forth rn lnr PON. r of ANarntv.a, d, s lore Los Helios 16th June 82 Sq"rd and ..... 41, list _on, al 19_ l• I J 0 • 9 nimv n� n n wrrvn ni TP n nrnMP n STAFF REPORT DATE: July 21, 1982 !� TO: City Council and City Manager 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR 5249 CAROL AVENUE SUBMITTED BY THOMAS AND AIDA ARAMAYO Mr. and Mrs. Aramayo, property owners, have applied for a building permit to construct a large addition to an existing dwelling unit on the property at 5249 Carol Avenue. The property does not front upon any public street. The access to the lot is provided from Sapphire Street by La Senda Road and Carol Avenue - a 15 -foot wide paved access through private easements among the adjacent property owners. As a prerequisite to issuance of building permit for landlocked parcels as established by City Council Resolution No. 80 -38, an irrevocable offer of dedication on his portion of the access for street purposes and a lien agree- ment for future improvements of the street are required. The document for the offer of dedication for that portion of Carol Avenue has been previously executed and Mr. and Mrs. Aramayo have entered into a lien agreement to provide the required street improvements at some future date to be determined by the City. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to accept and sign the lien agreement on behalf of the City. Respectfully subm'tted, LBH:JS:bc Attachments • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM THOMAS AND AIDA ARANIAYO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 80 -38 on May 7, 1980, to establish requirements for landlocked parcels where no subdivision is occurring; and WHEREAS, 5249 Carol Avenue, located on the west side of Sapphire Avenue, between Almond Street and Hillside Road, is a landlocked Parcel within the meaning of said Resolution No. 80 -38; and WHEREAS, Thomas and Aida Aramayo has executed a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property • Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: is ATTEST: Lauren H. Slasse rman, City Clerk Jon D. Hikels, Mayor 0 • r� 4 h zs l'r•'�..a rr r 5 � ;r. ro ;I I n ;, S 'AMEND/ 6 _ N /LL$ /DE rpp. T Cl n !• T _ I I A I /1 . � �1' ft � l/ 1 Ip:. � S i I J t. CITY OP RA1'C110 COCA \10 \'G;\ A ENGINEERING UR'IS;ON - VICINITY NIAP 19'74 I1:1 ^f � 3 j Ave n,wc 3T3 m' ^, "'B r3i3 P:.13 ��72 by of oR If J la s g c : c M o i3 PROJECT SIT i- r� 4 h zs l'r•'�..a rr r 5 � ;r. ro ;I I n ;, S 'AMEND/ 6 _ N /LL$ /DE rpp. T Cl n !• T _ I I A I /1 . � �1' ft � l/ 1 Ip:. � S i I J t. CITY OP RA1'C110 COCA \10 \'G;\ A ENGINEERING UR'IS;ON - VICINITY NIAP 19'74 I1:1 ^f 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY and WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: .. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA 9320 -C Base Line Road Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 {;rr: r� • REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT (5249 Carol Avenue) tt THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this :Li day of 1982, by and between Thomas F. and Aida A. Aramayo, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Developer "), am: the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), provides as follows: MHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit for residential development, the City requires the construction of missing off -site street improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement, adjacent to the property to be developed; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and HRIEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the cit;', which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer fails or neglects to do so and that thu City shall have a lien upon the real prop,rt'j harninnfter dnsrribed as security for the Developer's perform- ance, and any repaymw;t due City. NOW, TIIEREFORr, tHr, PARTICS AGREE: 1. The Developer hereby agrees that they will install off - site street improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement, in icenrdance and compliance with all applicable ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time of the installa- tion. Said improvements shall be installed upon and along Carol Avenue adlicenr. !o lev,lopors herclDa£ter described. a_� 0 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed not later than one (1) year following written notice to the Developer from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation of said improvements shall be at no expense to the City. 3. Li the event the Developer fails or refuses to cc-?'_cte the installation of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice Of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete said improvements and recover all costs of coc.pletion inc ,cd by the City from the Developer. 4. To secure the performance by the Developer of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City of any funds which may be expended by City in completing said improve- ments upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City the .`- ..ow1n- described real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • County of San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit: The Easterly 164.15 feet of the South 163.5 feet of th^ South 331 feet of the West 5 acres of Lot 10, Block 21, according to the map of the Cucaronga Homestead Association, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Maps, Page 46, rece :as Of said County - APN 1061- 101 -21. S. This :onvoy mre is in :lust, however, `.,: the purpcsc:; d esc:itea ahoy u. 6. Now, therefore, if the Doveleper shall faithfully air ,11 , Uh' a,.^.:' am. 'hilt.; !�h them to . r, dcnc ::odor this Agr oment, then this convcynnce shall be void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be con - sido,d onrl treated as a mor Ula,io on the real property and the r,ohta and obli,,tiuu, of the parties with rospect thorcto shall be loverm•d by the provisions of the Ctvil Code of the St.,te of California, an^. any other appl,c,blo statute, pertaininq to mortgages on real prnpert• ]. This Agreement shall be binding upoo and shall insure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. S. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the term "Developer" shall mean "mortgagor" and the City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the Civil Code of the state of California and any other statute pertaining to mortgages on real property. 9. If logil action is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is r•„ entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the right of the Developer to redeem the above - described property from the '3�J'_•: ice. _ mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled � to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys' fees as shall be ¢ }i awarded by the Court. •^+r"��+ -^ •-� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY: DEVELOPER: • Q`:� CITY OF RANCHO municipal. ' - �-•�� CALSFOR.`IIA, a manic ipa. r JON D. NIEiLS y' ♦ <. _ - MAYOR ATTEST: ClotLPPIAN - µ:Vi "•: C1 t, Cloth tO +, ♦a., 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss: COUNTY OF SAN SF,RNARDINO ) On 1983, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared JON D. MIEELS, known to me to be the mayor of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAIIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and r known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of sate, municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed the same. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. Notary Signature (SEAL) Not-r': .Fame Tvued STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On 311 i" 7, , 1982, before me, the undersicned, a Notary Pub" in and for Court y and State, personally appearod• T; 1= f- -� . �- -, known to me to be the person whose name r sutsczrbeT- toiEFTn instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same, WITNESS MY NAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL, Oli'1�.1 A I. >FAI, /'r+",� NgPY nHN W:.l1ah.5 (SEAL) Notary SS ig azure VI I Notary Name Typed NOTE: When document is executed by a Corpora Linn or Partnership, thn abovr ,IURAT is not acceptable. A Corporation /Partnership JUPAT is rnqu')—rcd. • • 0 9 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 21, 1932 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer' SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion S.A. 79 -10 - located at 9900 Arrow Route OWNER: Church of the Nazarene 9900 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Pass Book (Road Improvements) $6500.00 AG c9 C9 T U VV U,I 1977 The road improvements for Site Approval 79 -10 have been constructed in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the City Council accept the improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. LBH:bc • CITY OF Rq%C!1O CUCAMONGA Post Office Be:, 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 lV=1 RECORDED MOIL TO: CITY CLERE C:7:' Or R;::CI!O CCCAM=GA Past Office Bo::1807 Rancho Cucw ..m..o California 91730 NOTICE Or COi!PLE ^IC)! NOTICE IS REP.EBy GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of ethic.. interest or estate is: . >_.r -. .... ... ... S.A. 79 -10 •' 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owns, is: CITY OF R_ : :CF.O CVCA:40NW, 9320 -C Oaseline Road, Post Office 'c 807, Reach. Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 21st day of July r 15 82, there was cc-- p_eted on the hereinafter described real property the worm% of fa- oro•:eeeot set fo,.th in the contract docer,ents for S.A. 79 -10 Road Improvements 4. The name of the original contractor for the wer6: of ic- provenent as a whole was Church of the Nazarene 5. The real property referred to herein is sit;:atad i • _r._ City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, an_ is described as follows: S.A. 79.10 The street address of said property is: 9900 Arrow Route WBCO: r 19 . CITY Or =47::0 CL'CA.10 :."" .l . ^,.unit igal cc c:o r:: crop, G.: r.o: B'f : 1:: >ro� L oYd B. MutOf (Titlol C(ty Engtneer • RESOLUTION NO. 9J -I,j7. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFORNiA, ACCEPTING THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR SITE APPROVAL NO. 79 -10, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of street improvements for Site Approval No. 79 -10 has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: • ATTEST: Lauren WaWasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mikels, Ilayor • • Tl•- 947 -3517 HUIMANI: SlICIH:TY OF THE t" (.IIAPrC3' ICOM- 31UNITY, INC. A NOWPNOFIT ORGANIZATION. INCORPORATED JUNE IYOI 1010 EAST MISSION SLVO. (Hwv. 601 ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91]81 July Is', 1982 TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: In compliance with your request, the Humane Society of the Chaffey Community, Inc. agrees to an indefinite extension of our animal control contract with the City of Rancho Cucamonga on a month -to -month basis. Either the City or the Society may terminate said contract with a thirty -day notice in writing, specifying the last day of a calendar month as date of termination. HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE CHAFFEY COMMUNITY, INC. BY Chairman of the Board J� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M Mayor df the City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: City Clerk of Rancho Cucamonga A. 2 T__ E L F. N T BETWEEN T CM C? RAMC }0 C=,,".ONGA AND '-j.*;-NE SCC3TY OF T.-.Z ='.*':j.X;TY INC. THIS made in duplicate, by and between the CITY OF RA:;C-'C CUCA61ON= a municipal corporation, hereinafter designated as "City', and the F.UvANE SOOT - -Y OF = CKAF-EY INC., hereinafter designated as 'S.c4ety', W I T..:... S -- TH Whereas, the purpose 0, the parties in entering into this agreement is to relieve the City from the burden and expense o: providing public pound service and to contract for said service with the Hxuane Society under the terms and conditions as provided herein. NOW, THEREFOR3, in consideration of the premises and of the terms and conditions A' this agreement on the pa,t. of said Society to be kept and performed and herein conta4nedv does hereby employ said Society as Poundmaster of said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the period of one (1) year beginning July 1. 1973 under the terms and conditions following, 1. The humane Society does hereby agree, (a) To provide the City with a public pound service and to perform all the duties and functions of humane officer, pound- master, dog license collector and to render all public pound services required by I., c.=-ancimg My 1, 1978. -N-blic pound service- as used herei.. shall include the collection of do, licensed, the furaishi.ng and issuance of metal deg tags, cor.duct;.,, an an'..a.' rabies inoculation program, the furnishing and equipping or a proper, Adequate and suitable public pound, and any and all apperat.a and equipment, services, supervision and labor necessary to promptly, p-operly, fully, completely and efficiently perform and dinharge at this da mane Society's own cost and expru.s, the collection of license fees and all actr and duties to be porfoz...P.d or discharged by the nd-.are officer, p".,ndnaster and the dog license collector, as more fully set forth in the ordinances of the City of Redone Cucamonga when not inconsistent With the terms of this contract. (b) To furnish the proper person.. el, motor vehicle, radio P.qu'p7::J, and equ4pm,nt therefcr, and to patrol the puol,4c t...Qr PdbI7., planet aitn said City of ad.xho Cucamcn7a five days each week oetmeer. the approxi-ate hours of h�jra por w�'X 0, _ pdtrc, 6.00 a,m, to 5,00 p.r., 40 for ah^ purpose of o.ptu.;., or.! any dog Or dog A . ,* running at ladje in violation of thu ter., and previsions of Cods of said City of Ran,.-,o Cacnao r. ra, or any amend-ent thereto, and to promptly answer all calla from roold.otj or from thp City regarding stray, injured, daor,erous or 'diseased dope or dead an4•aI3, patrol on either Saturday or l,M ay f.., 8,00 a.m, to 5,00 1.,. IhIl-, be 1.,dwd%,, I., a coca a month rcu-14-1 h.svz. 5 F The Society shall perfCem at least one concentrated patrol • in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, per month with a team of at least three humane officers. Between the hours of 5100 p.m. and 9,00 a.m., Monday through Saturday and all day Sunday, the Society will provide emergency service only. The emergency service shall consist of injured animal pickup, stray animal bites and any situation involving immediate danger to person or property, as determined by the City Administrator or his designee, (a) To maintain kernels so constructed that they will meet the minimum standards of the State of California and County of San Bernardino Health Department and operate the animal shelter in a humane manner, keeping the premises at all times in a sanitary ardvholesome condition and to enforce all provisions of the laws and ordinances of the State of California and the City of Ran"o Cucamonga pertaining to humane animal work of picking up and disposing of all dead, unwanted, stray or injured animals. (d) To enforce all of the provisions of the City ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and all amendments and supplements thereto pertaining to public pound service and specifically including the enforcement of any leash laws which are presently in force or in the 2Ltur, will- be enacted. ' (e) To cooperate with the County of San Bernardino • Health Department by nicking up, accepting. caring for and main- taining in custody animals for observation and gvarantina, at the request of the County Health Department and at the expense of the Humane Society, and to report to the Health Department any and all cases of rabies or persons bitten by dogs. (f) To be prepared to render public pound service every day as the circumstances require; to keep the animal shelter open at regular hours to the general public on all days except Sundays and the fcllorring holidays. January 1, February 12, February 22, May 30, July 4, labor Day, Septenber 9. November 11. Thanksgiving Day. and December 25. (g) To pick up and impound all animals sub;ect to the terms of We agreement at the request of the City or any resident thereof who. ever required by the terms of any law or ordinance or when required by sound humane practices, without charge to the City, Cwnnro of impounded dogs shal_' be ....__ -se. ty mail or tele- phone of the impoundment of the anima: by the Society, (h) To hold impounded animals for a period of three days or longer, and to take whatever steps are deemed approprlate by the Society in the release of dogs that assures the obtaining of a rabies inoculation. (i) To conduct annually a rabies clinic to be held for the purpose of inoculating all dogs in the City at a specified • time and place given by the Society. This clinic is to be held yearly at no cost to the City. The individual cost of inoculation, n U f ,t this tire, will be the sus of j2.00. This fee will be :urn4s..a1 by the owners o: said dogs. At ,.._s particular ti -e, the Soc sty will also furnish all perso-.nel for the purpose of inoc,lation and the collecting of all license fees. (j) To furnish and supply to the City at the beginning of each fiscal year a conpiete list of the officers and ,,e-be -s of the Hoard of Directors o: the Eumane Society and is employees, topet.`.e.. w_t r. their addresses and telephone numbers, and to es :ablish and -.1 n :a in full and comp le to records showing the .a ca and addresses of all persons to who dog license certificates and metallic tags have been issued, or for whom dogs have been vaccin- ated against rabies, together wit:: records of date, place and manner whereby ani,aals were impounded and disposition ..ads of sane, and .r' s received for license and impound -ert. (k) To submit monthly reports to the City which includes the following infor- ationi That contained in Exhibit 'A" ('Mont : :ly Activity Report) which shall include the results of concentrated patrols and othcr such infrr -ation as reasonably required by the City Adr,.in'strator. (L) To conduct a con..- rehensive public information campaign including such areas of concern as deg car_, services provided by the Society and City laws relating to ani-al control. The content aid method of this prop am is subject to the City Administrator's approval. 2. The Sccie -.y hereby agree. to hold the City harmless fro -. any damage or liability arising out of t',-,e operations of the 'ruc.a.e Society under this contract. The Y.cnare Society agrees to keep in force at all -es a policy of c=.prehensive liability insurance in tae sun of $700,000,00, protecting itself and the City against all derands, cla'_-.s, causes of acticn o. judg meats, and from all expenses that may be incurred in investigating or resisting the sat ,e, The :dumane Society also agrees to keep ir. effect at all ti:.es 'n o: kme r.'s Compensa :ion Insurance on all its employees, and to cause to be banned all its agents who in the exercise of their duties collect or have custody of ary funds of r the society. 7. T'ne Society may conduct house to house car:vausing for the purpose of lleensing unlicensed dogs, Canvasser: shn'_l be app^rvgd by the City and s'nall carry with them at ail tines, w,`.e. engr.�ed in ..,.s wor ::, a card desi ; -a ng .her. as arm cff icial canvaccar approved by the City. Canvassing ray be done only dun 1. dayiirht scars and shall. be conducted periodically during the year at tines .,c- :pta'ale to t,v. City Ad. -.: ni strator. Any co -piai Its by citizens regard:,-,,-, canvauscrs o. t.,cir tec:.niques shall b¢ brougTt to :ne attcntiol of the City Administrator and he shall take such action as he deems necessary to correct the situation. 4. ...,. tY hereby a „tees to the foilowin; , (a) The Scciaty shall collect and retain t,e dog license fees. after Jae. 1, 1973 and collect and retain inpounding fees 7 -1 and other charges made for public pound service, after Ju'Y 1, 1978. • (b) To handle office collection of fees and to is sue dog tags at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center in consideration of payment by the Society :o the City of five percent of All license fees collected by the City, It being expressly understood and aoreed that such collection service shall be limited to office collection at the Civic Center and that the Society and its agents shall do all field collection provisions of the City ordinance regulating and :ieepin. of dogs, (e) To provide to the Society a reasonable Opportunity to express its opinion pertaining to the enactment or amendment of any City ordinance pertaining to public pound services. (d) To cooperate with the Society in all matters pertain. ing to public pound service, 5. The City shall provide legal counsel for matters arising out of the Society's enforcement -ti'the leash law end other City Code provisions pertaining to dogs and other animals and in con. sideration the City shall retain 20 percent of all leash law fines, 6. The City shall designate or approve all fees and charges levied or collected by the Society in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 7. The duration of this agreement shall be 15 months cor^.enc!. ^.g April 1, 1978 and ending Sun. 70, 1979. The agreement may be extended on a year to year basis 4/m utual tual • consent. IN 'dIT.R5S Iw.._R_C?, said City of Rancho Cucamonga has cause? 1 c more and corporate seal to be hereunto subscribed and affixed by its proper officers, and said Society has caused is name to be hereunto subscribed by its proper officer this I day of 1978. SCC'ETY OF THE CHAFF= CCY: ':=T . CITY OF RVXXO CCO.lA09B.i By Chair,ran of the Board D)aYor of the City of l/ Rancho Cucsneega 3 l AT -M. City Clere.., City or Ranc no .acamonga • 0 • 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 21, 1982 TO: City Council & City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Administrative Analsyt SUBJECT: Removal of Abandoned Orchards From time to time we receive complaints regarding abandoned orchards from concerned residents. Orchards of this sort pose various health and safety problems. A method the City may employ to alleviate this problem within Rancho Cucamonga is to authorize the San Bernardino County Weed Abatement Division to administer the abandoned orchard sections of the county code. County Weed Abatement staff would only act on an individual case basis, and at the request of the City. When abandoned orchards are reported, city staff will take a look at the area (also consult Fire District on fire hazard possiblity), and if it appears to be a possible problem, then the county staff will be notified to take the needed action. In allowing County Weed Abatement staff to administer the code, no funding or city staff involvement is required in the removal process. Additionally, an item to remember is that a property owner has up to six (6) years to pay for the abatement of his /her property. If the City chose to undertake this process, our funds could be held up for this time. The County is able to provide this service and cover all costs (administration and labor) due to the large area they serve and the addition of our City's abandoned orchards would have little or no impact on their operation. We do not expect to have a great deal of orchard complaints: how- ever, this would set up a mechanism to deal with problems as they arise. An example of the type of area this action would take care of is the orchard (abandoned) located north of Banyan, east of Beryl, west of Sacramento. RECOMMENDATION: It is reconnended the City Council authorize the San Bernardino Department of Agriculture, Weed Abatement Division, to administer County Code section 27.051- 27.057 (removal of Abandoned Orchards). RAR /vz 0 • L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 21, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Assessment District 82 -1 CA.t+o 2 + n 41 F,; Z Uri > 1977 JI Attached for Council review is the Order of Procedure and Resolutions necessary for the formation of Industrial Assessment District 82 -1. This information is self explanatory, however, I would draw attention to the resolution awarding the construction contract to Bonadiman- McCain, Inc. in the amount of $4,516,000 (20; below Engineer's Estimate of $5,793,236) and the bond bid award to Stone 8 Youngberg at 12% with an 8.5% discount (This is 6.5% below estimate and below recent bids received in Ontario). Summaries of total bids received are attached for your review. The item analysis of the bids involves 143 items which were analyzed by computer. If you are interested this breakdown will be available at the Council hearing. Also attached is a summary of properties to be condemned and protests received to date. At this point it would appear that the District has strong support and little opposition. LBH: ly submitted, 1.1 0 • r SUMMARY OF PROTESTS RECEIVED AS OF JULY 14, 1982 A. D. 82 -1 PARCEL NO. OWNERS ACREAGE 119 Haven Building Materials, Inc. 4.51 226, 227, 228, Wagner -Insul Co., Inc. 8.58 229, 230, 232 60 Redfield, Jr. & Betty H. Finlay 2.47 _' t �F Zc Y W Q = K w 2 C O� w 0 LL ti� n • FC U noN N W v 77 lei 1 �� •1- I t✓ — .N l yyl -i ,�`I Ici .III ., r:• :a,: � TI .I I 0 • • JULY 10, 1982 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENTLEMEN: We wish to formally protest the proposed Master Plan and Assessment indicated in your letter regarding PROPERTY OWNERS BENEFITING FROM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 (Formerly 79 -1). We have already had to pay for curbs and gutters in front of our property at a cost of $ 11,550.00. We have had no problems with water drainage on our property and feel that this is unwarranted. We are strongly opposed to this undertaking at this particular time, when business is suffering numerous setbacks from decreased building construction and increased prices. We do not want to see our efforts to build a sucessful business fail because of the grandiose plans of others who will not have to pay the bills. JS /im HAVEN BUILDING MATERIALS, INC. 9393 Haven Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -- -- \ T� President JOSEP STROMME, Secretary /Treasurer y WAGNER -INSUL COMPANY, INC. • 110 North Market Street East Palestine, Ohio 44413 (216) 426 -4151 June 30, 1982 .. 1JL :IiY - i•,:.ilCi10 C0Clu "0.1 .� Mr.. Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Department of Engineering 9320 -C Baseline Road Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Assessment District No. 82 -1 (6th Street Industrial Area) Assessment Nos. 226, 227, 228, 229, 230 an,. ? ?� Dear Sir: You are hereby notified that the undersigned Protests the • improvements and formation of Assessment District No. 82 -1. This protest applies to not only the above assessment num- bers, but to anv properties in which the undersigned has an interest, whether listed above or not. MDL: sgg Very truly yours, WAGNER -INSUL COMPANY, INC. LA -I j M. D. LaBATE President • • �I..`fIp• )I • �N °J`� Jf[�'�/1 .'J 7Err J .4 � OI'ice80iffin 11308 Burbank Blvd. • North Hot good. Ca 91601 Ti �nl 9: Y' 1213) 877 9904 Shop: 3865 Vincent Avenue • Cucamonga. Ca hlorma 91730 • (714) 9874864 June 8, 1982 ' y Mr Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer t4 k y i i - City of Rancho Cucamonga JU.! _,/ P.O. Box 807 ' Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 CiTi Ci rc6i1L4n CUC6:,:C:iCi Dear We recently received the Notice of the proposed formation of a special assessment district that will include properties owned by us. This peetains to District No. 82 -1 (6th Street Industrial Area). It pertains to our property as: Assessment No. 60 — Assessors No. 209 - 143-18 The property is located at 8865 Vincent Ave., Cucamonga, Calif. lie wish to file our objection to this District (Proposed) and • Protest any such district or assessment of our property to pay for said proposed improvements. At the time we purchased our property we were assured that all street improvements, sewers, etc. were in and paid for. Further, Lucas Land Comnany, from who we purchased the property, advised us and our Real Estate Agent that as part of their development of this industrial tract they had posted a substantial bond to pay for the completion of the storm drain under the Santa Fe Railroad tracks at the Southerly end of Vincent Ave. and that same would be completed as soon as the County of San Bernardino completed the engineering and obtained rigths to go under said Santa Fe RR tracks. When this was finished the necessary storm drains would be installed at no further costs to the proporty owners at this location. Further, they had to obtain special permission from the county of San Bernardino to sell us our land as the part lying southerly of our property and up to the Santa Fe Railway right of way had to be retained as a sump until th!s was completed. / yery7 Sincerely • Red•f leld Finlay 'Jr b Betty H. Finlay Property Owners: 8865 Vincent Ave., Cucamonga, Ca. Assessement No. 60 Ly r � T )°`�°7, 170, ag7M 7 �' -E r��rt� ✓NJ1J j5� su �. i1. S Office& Billing: 11308 Burbank Blvd. • North Hollywood. Ca 91601 • (213) 877 9904 Shop: 9865 Vi need l Avenue • Cucamonga. Cali Porn is 91730 • (714) 987.4864 June 8, 1982 V Mr Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer a k- hw YO d `y `'" 7, City of nanc do Cucamonga �I P.C. Box 807 JUi. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 MY uF rkNC40 CUC —Mwic" Dear We recently received the Notice of the proposed formation of a special assessment district that will include properties owned by us. This peetains to District No. 82 -1 (6th Street Industrial Area). It pertains to our property as: Assessment No. 60 — Assessors No. 209 - 1153-18 The property is located at 8865 Vincent .Ave., Cucamcnga, Calif. We wish to file our objection to this District (Proposed) and • Protest any such district or assessment of our property to pay for said proposed improvements. At the time we purchased our property we were assured that all street improvements, sewers, etc. were in and paid for. Further, Lucas Land Comnany, from who we purchased the property, advised us and our Real Estate Agent that as part of their development of this industrial tract they had posted a substantial bond to pay for the completion of the storm drain under the Santa Fe Railroad tracks at the Southerly end of Vincent Ave. and that same would be completed as soon as the County of San Bernardino completed the engineering and obtained rigths to go under said Santa Fe RR tracks. When this was finished the necessary storm drains would be installed at no further costs to the property owners at this location. Further, they had to obtain special permission from the county of San Bernardino to sell us our land as the part lying southerly of our property and up to the Santa Fe Railway right of way had to be retained as a sump until th!s was completed, /ery Sincerely Re df l aid Finlay Jr L Betty H. Finlay Property Owners: 88655 Vincent Ave., Cucamonga, Ca, Assessement No. 60 �l SUMMARY OF RIGHT OF WAY TO • BE ACQUIRED BY CONDEMNATION A.D. 82 -1 PARCEL NO. OWNERS TYPE AMOUNT OF OFFER 98A, 98B, 98C, 98D Rancho Haven Assoc. Drainage Easement $11,430.00 IOIA Rancho Cucamonga Prop. Drainage Easement $ 9,281.00 102 Nina Mandala, et al Drainage Easement $10,512.00 236 Golomb & Dever Road Easement $38,115.00 290 Concetta Mandala, et al Draiange Easement $17,531.00 248 Mineo & Dippolito Read Easement $10,500.00 $97,369.00 • • 7STORM GRAIN BENEFIT STREET IMP, BENEFIT PRODSED STORM DRAIN . . ... PROP()b ED STREET IMPS ee 34 2. IA q t) v x 5T -7 !1-,16 Z 610 50M MARY —(I'J) Qu (C-A . sc�s., -lmc- Co� (r- 4 E- Q--V— V4 - -D-1 9 S. -1 Nic __So �j S It- SCws INC, f —(I'J) Qu (C-A . sc�s., -lmc- SCws INC, f • BID FO FM 1915 wr M= 10: CM Cc mnn CSM`r 9320 C atse WL R'vd Post Offlm W. 607 Parcho C rj=ra, Grl..ifocva 91730 rMs PrvMsal far Lam.. v t Boor , Ms asp t OiaCia uo. 82 -1 6t11 Street •,dustrL l Aron, Not to C-em $11.823,070.20 In acccrd v with all ta-- and conditions of your tat1Q of Sale of L-r=,r =t Dorris, L:pvton t Act of 1915. tisess, .nt Olst l= Na. 82 -1r lots' Jcmx 16, 1932, :c sLh-at the follori^9 bL for L. it maes =t po a Act of 1915) to to dated 5e-t 2, 1982, a th rntricst Fey:ble Janary 2, 1983 " U=eaftcr sear- ann,allY M .lathyrY 2 and,luly 2: mrs la7tl r JULY 2 A"* 1981 1985 1986 1987 1998 1909 1990 1991 1992 1993 • 1995 1995 1996 1997 /b Will 'I q1 199f8 ct a to .af 5., 1l'T�l"TtT -�l7 locon Sntc t to to o'u r Ccliuy. 1`a bid, la, LY['�L�. Rives (tins loterast cost s 15,174,378.25 Dix t /ms.w, 6 1,004,960.97 'tvrAL t'°r miv ox1• Ilrrforartion a,lY) yl 5 lfi, 179, 339.22 Lffectiw ti-'t Intcn.t pate (Information Only) 12.607,1 1 is a di...✓ nth �c a's.c ltfiis offer is saLjcet to a rattr.f.+:_toty Lmal wmi.o b1 0. , a tlsarc4, lrvim, Cal is c:ntn, udrovllj Ua Iludrty of Uw Lp L. at lair nGaa w:. 1Pclosr.l Mrcin is a !G,sh, cr'sl (G:rtifiN! Cti k in Cm a t of 5) NY`Ltle to U.e Q-.-dr of: CM of Rv l Cx nnma, wn:e', w: n,.=st to rre=rw {ampal•/ in O ! omnt •.e •arc cot t suctcsstuL W Ller, oUnrn .a W m reeunuL • W alpliol e7auvt L. l !urct� prroe of ur, tnnla. 'ads bid is mx!c suhja to U oartuuars (if w1) at o on fbin Sllmittn! /LV $�.t•,• ' yr•tn• tx YO (Flr.,l OY n L C..st ,....; (PCpresnnW UVCI Other 4c.1:rs of eM L��d is atn nom ' V C�1i 101ma_•unl%:...ii i. usl.ca !nc. 4607 Llr } ;ershi;t Blvd, Ste. 202 MOB I1,. 'l ,I" uar "U ibl'• RZI, CA 91602 (213) 985 -8121 -1C. a- L1 I • • First Interstate a Bank 2935797 f tah;ornia N 0 FE), Fi1�, 4605 a.krlcod Office On North L ogle .d, BNtl. _ North Floliywood, CA 9]602 Cashiers Check 1220 o, %,E 7 -14 -82 -_ PAY '' +. 0c), 'i', s "1aa ,_000_Q0� MCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA" 01W 1 630 h'029357971' 1: 12 2000 2 Lai: 1370 "- 9r19501i' 11 • • BID MO M 1915 I DaSs 7D: CM � PxC� RC.KSIG1 9720 C easeli, Faad Post Office av8 807 P.&n.ro C - era, Call fo: ua 91770 MR: Prrp. a ftr :vv -:ernt ^.a ' Asses . t nistrit_' No. 82 -1 6th Street I .tri Area, Not to Er<zvl $11,523.070.20 1n rc crd.. with all tr..n a.•d ro rz '._t o of wur btioc of Sale of L,. c melt bonds, L sr='e:er:t ?c_ of 1915, Asses..mt OS trio ::. 82 -1, dated Jere 16, 1992, ae s ._t ce follc=a bid for L. ^ctiz^.tnt bbWS (Irp =r:e- m nt Bond P - of 1915) to be dated Septcr'xr 2, 1982, with inter- rest payable Jenuty 2, 396$ and t•areaftnr seize- W,'ua11y m Jarw y 2 azd Ju1y 2: ti JOLY 2� III:EgS: i..YIL' —3993-- 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1991 1994 1995 1996 1997 fate will pay %D. 57 199Z a K.�yrlyywoE $�� fT LS hid, ist m e dauvery. The hid, is: h ::e zmve aces Interest M.(t� 5L'—TAar 7 7^ Dls:r,'?teram!'� 5 1 /I " 5. SZ r (7ti^�atten�_l � T s (D) J r /I•�.' /rJ F1fa:r ive ::•t :nJest :vte :2 1 77� % toL II+rCCr..ation C;,lyl � i• Y 7tds offs- is sub•r.0 tea sa[1sf: r„^,p. le-a1 mi: See R' ?: n s ::acarek, 3Tt1csM here L'1 is a rn of $LoJL-oao,00 Payable to C.0 o. ^.!c �:rr o: %L' tLCrema, 4 crh w r "'sc b,e rr cc l::y ptmitlY m L ^.0 e•m. t w are rot tc cncesutsl bcuar, OUn .,ise W be rcrw • erd aylioi .sgaust U.,c cvm prtcc of ttn tnw. This bid ie mde s;S;tct W L`c .rxlincn (if arryl sftn,n on �u nwrsa. SoGnitt'd by, Wlert5c rho ,c1' 1: PL�(e' oott11��P Mxbera of Lhe Syrdicztc arc: By, . 0 . , _.... _ � . •, o -.:J . ::mss.,.,,.. -.w.._ H ,.,.., ... .: ..,,.....,.. „ c� ....,.. , . — . - - -- � - - - c"IDGiti 06173924 ,20 DATE JULY 19,1982 PAY RDERgHE* * *CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA* * * * *S *100,000.00* O OA T T CRGI'F Ei. pp• n:n rnu ear r.,r ry �s.i n r A,If:F19�,; °I.:::; .�h. M.� I I� I I I I .r u•!,1`r DOLLARS `��,rurwvn[ G � I "C&473921.11' 1 :1 2 200008 51: 91575O28 In' 4O11 • DATE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS: ORDER OF PROCEDURE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 JULY 21, 1982 PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR HEARING REQUIRED PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF CONSIDERATION: "SPECIAL ASSESS>1ENT, LIMITATIC:1 AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931 ". HEARING REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT Go 1913 ". HEARING ON NECESSITY TO ORDER EMINENT 00MAIN PROCEEDINGS. (/ MAYOR: Announce, "This is the time and place fixed for the Public Hearings on ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 as above stated." Indicate that for convenience, these Puhl,c Rearings mill be • combined into a single Hearing; however, individual actions will be taken where appropriate. CITY CLERK: Announce that notice of Hearing has been given in the manner and form as required by law, and that the following affidavits are on file: - Certificate of Posting Streets; - Certificate of Mailing Notice and Filing _ Boundary Map; - Affidavit of Publication of Notice of Imprevement; - Affidavrt of Publication of Notice Inviting Sealed Bids; Al Affid.v rt. of Postern Notice Inviting Sealed Bids. - Certificate of Mail,no Notice of Hearing on Eminent proceedings. STAFF. Evpla,n inn uose, scone and order of procedure for Public Rear,ngii. STAFF; • Explain pe neral nature, location and extent of the pY OpD5ed works of ,mproinnenl and boundaries of the Assessment District. - Present "Report" pursuant to Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code and sumari:e contents. - Present and surmArize "Peaort" furs uanl to the previsions Of the "Municipal IPproveRpt Act of 1913 ", consrstina of the followinq; a. Plans; b. Specifications; • c. Assessment Roll; A. Assessment D,agrnm; e' Description of the works of n- pro,inent. - Ee Pl nn 'v thod and formula of assessment spread; 0 ORDER of PPOCrTJRE CITY OF RA.'CMO cd:C4ON'GA ASSESSMENT P,STPICT NO. A2 -1 PAGE TWO DATE OF P'JELIC HFARINSS: JULY 21, 1992 - Hake rec D- 'endation as to any nddlfiCatiGr.S ne:nssary In the assesX:fts Or preceew:s; Ac,,P.N cons tr vet l0n hl js race ad: - Fake rec On �endat'i in as t0 sale Of GCn "s: - Suavarl,,e extent of nIghts-of -way Still neces<ary to be acqun ed. CITY CLERK: Announce the , -her of ,irlttal protests r,ce,,ed and avn Dunce that copies have been delkered to �Z- -���.. �.:,, e.a ti, -_ each ^zib,r of the leg IAT ative body, OR nounce that there were no written ;retests. /Ant MAYOR: rs ask to hear frer those who have f I I e7 .,4 11///�� Ari tifn Fr.t^_sts aiainst the p. "cad lr'ys. Nest, ask to hear from anyone else who wishes to ipenk analnst the i *provenent, the Assess -ant District, or the oethod of spread. Then, ask to hear from anyone woo wishes to speal In fa,0, of the proceed,ODS. OPPOk -. UR:T1' FOR REBUTTAL STAFF! ReDOrt 00 percentace (%) Of protests received. STAFF: Discussion on , ;,"reed,nos and eWlaralion of alternates available. STAFF: Pr es e nt a t l no of any or ODD Sed ch an o es or rod,fi - cations to the [,,peer's "Report" and the Assessr.ent Gist, lot. CITY WPirl, Oroc msion on chances and r5dificatlons. CITY r,GrV I : By Mri mn, deelnrc Public neartnns TA OSFO. IF THE LEGISLAIIVE FOOT WIY!;S TO PROCEED: CITY LD':AAIC r — Adoot RF1OL1iTI0'1 T MERI'A c,i NFIS rd;O - `NriICA- 11f :S'. this P.asoloUOn 11 ,:pare Pilate f -r any eha,es Or nJdificitions rnnuWrrd frc-, the first preseo,at,ro of -"he Fnolni,'s 'P,ort ". CITY it "vCIl Aaoat RE1O1LUT101 f9iAAUL I'G kin PJ,YIM1G PROTESTA: To be adop LLLd If any Drote -ls, 0,11 or wrttlen, have been received. CITY COUNCIL Adopt RESOI J1101 pEUPPL'dh, VCESSITY: The ad "Flinn of this Rnalot, on Is a statutory req.m e-e nt, end a 4/5's vote I, required, - �l 9 {. .. (GOER OF PPOCEDURE -f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ::. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 PACE THREE DATE OF PUP.t IC HEARINGS: JULY 21, 1982 CITY CODICIL: Adopt RESOLUTION APPRO'11-IG CONTRIEUTION: TMs is the formal action act, oving the CDntnbut ion. CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLU71ON CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS: This Resolution orders the nark and confirr.s the assessments. CITY CWNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION A5ARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT: The adoption of this Resolution awds the Con- struction contract to the lOVest responsible bidder. CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FOR THE SALE OF BONDS: This Resolution accepts the prnposal for the sale of hinds to finance the Ilnpr.Venients. CITY COL' -CiL: Adopt RESOLUTION ORDERING EMINENT MI MS PRO - CEEOINGS: Adoption Of this Reso' on orders the proceedings for emmenl dpnain. A 4 /5's vote is rdo,red. • - RESOLUTION NO. T � —I a 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA., CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S "REPORT" IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously adopted its Resolution of Intention pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain works of improvement in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "); and WHEREAS, subsequent thereto, the City Council did, by Resolution, approve the "Report" and call for sealed bids on the construction of the works of improvement as contemplated in said Assessment District; and WHEREAS, prior to said Public Hearing, sealed bids were received is and considered for the construction of the works of improvement in the Assessment District, and at this time an amended assessment roll has been presented showing modifications and reductions in all assessments because of the favorable construction bid so received; and WHEREAS, at this time bids have also been received for the sale of bonds; and WHEREAS, it now appears that the changes and modifications as set forth in the amended assessment roll as presented herein should be approved and ordered to be done. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That it is hereby ordered that the changes and modification, as set, forth in the amended assessment roll as presented herein, hased on the hits re,:r.ived, are hereby aoprovod and ordered to be dona. SECT iQ71 3: That said changes and modifications above- mentioned are hereby ordered pursuant to the authority as set forth in Section :0352 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 "). • Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 4: That the Engineer's "Report ", the Assessment Roll, • and all related documentation, as so modified, are all for the best interests of the property owners within the Assessment District, and said assessment, as modified and apportioned, is in accordance with the benefits received, and the "Report ", as herein modified and amended, shall stand as the "Report" for all subsequent proceedings relating to this Assessment District. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren WaWasserman, City Clerk CJ J 4 • RESOLUTION NO. 9a -I d`r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING AND DENYING PROTESTS AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonaa, California, has, by Resolution, declared its intention to order the con- struction of certain public works of improvement, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of tha Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "); and WHEREAS, certain owners of property liable to be assessed for improvements have filed written protests or objections and delivered the same to the City Clerk not later than the hour set for hearing such ob- jections; and WHEREAS, at the time set for said Public Hearing, all protests • and objections were duly heard and considered, and all matters as to the method and formula of the assessment spread and the determination as to whether or not the property did receive a benefit and whether the assessments were apportioned in accordance to benefit were heard and considered, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the public hearing on the Assessment District is hereby closed. SECTION 3: That all protests and objections of every kind and nature be, and the same hereby are, overruled and denied, and it is further determined that said protests and objections are made by the owners of less than one. -half (112) of the area of property to be assessed for said improvements within said Assessment District. SECTION 4: That is hereby further determined that all properties within the boundaries of the Assessment District receive a local and direct benefit from the works of improvement as proposed for said Assess- ment District, and it is hereby further determined and declared that all assessable costs and expenses have been apportioned and spread over the properties within the boundaries of the Assessment District in direct proportion to the benefits received thereby. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 5: That the Engineer's method of spread and apportion- . ment of all costs is hereby approved and adopted as being a correct and proper apportionment and distribution of all assessable costs for these works of improvement. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk �1 Jon D. Mikels, Mayor J • • RESOLUTION NO. 2 L -I O. S_ ( A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DETER14INING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE IMPROVEMENTS AND APPUR- TENANCES SUBSTANTIALLY AS SET FORTH IN THE REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTI- GATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931 "; THAT THE PROJECT IS FEASIBLE; AND THAT THE LANDS WILL BE ABLE TO CARRY THE BURDEN OF THE PRO- POSED ASSESSMENT The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That all protests and objections be overruled and denied upon the express finding that they are made by the owners of less than one -half (1/2) of the area of property to be assessed. SECTION 2: That the public interest, convenience and necessity require certain public works of improvement and appurtenances and appurtenant work in a special assessment district known and designated as • ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "), substantially as set forth in the "Report" thereot filed under the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 ", being Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 3: That the project is feasible and that the lands to be assessed wiTl be able to carry the burden of the proposed assessment, and that the limitations of the amounts of assessments provided for in Division 4 of the Streets and Highways rode of the State of California be disregarded both with respect to the limitation on the Assessment District, as a whole, and as to the limitation on individual specific assessments. SECTION n; That by this Resolution, it is the intention of this Cmmcl to xal;r, all findings by the affirmative four- fifths (4 /5ths) a vote of all meribers thereof that all determinations as to necessity and feasibility and necessity to disregard the limitations and proceedings set uo in Division 4 as therein provided be made and determined. . PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: C-) U RESOLUTION NO. ° d - 1a iP I J �\ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND PROVIDING FOR CONTRIBUTION TO PAY CERTAIN COSTS '•.\ AND E%PMS IN AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has, by Resolution, declared its intention to authorize the construction of certain works of improvement pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "); and WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous at this time of providing a contribution to pay a portion of the costs and expenses of the work and proceedings; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10205 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, a contribution may be provided • to pay a portion of the costs and expenses at any time prior to the confir- mation of the proceedings on said Assessment District. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the appropriation of the monies as set forth as a contribution in the Engineer's "Report" as herein presented relating to the above - referenced Assessment District is hereby approved and author- ized. Said contribution shall be used to pay for the items of work as set forth in said Engineer's "Report" and the appropriation shall be from the funds as indicated therein. SECTION 3: That said contribution is authorized pursuant to Section 10205 of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • G\ • 10 RESOLUTION NO. c �y° A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO EX- ERCISE THE RIGHT OF EMINENT DOMAIN TO ,ACQUIRE EASEMENTS ACROSS PROPERTY FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 IMPROVEMENTS RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California: The public safety, welfare, convenience, interest and necessity require the acquisition by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, or easements across the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for public use, to -wit: roads, public utilities and /or storm drains for Assessment District No. 82 -1 in the City (hereinafter referred to as the "proposed project "). That the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to acquire ease -ents across said property by eminent domain pursuant to Government Code Section 37350.5 and /or Streets and Highways Code Section 10102. That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and determines that: (1) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. (2) The proposed project is planned, or located, or planned and located, in the manner that will be the most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. (3) The properties described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference are necessary for the proposed project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized to acquire, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, easements across the lands described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, for the purposes described in said Exhibit "A ", by donation, purchase or by condemnation in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of the State of California and the lairs of the State of California relating to eminent domain. That the City Attorney of the City of rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorizer) and instructed to prepare and prosecute, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, such suit or suits in the lawful Court having ,jurisdiction thereof as is necessary to condemn easements across said land,, for the purposes bpreinabove mentioned. Resolution No. Page 2 The real properties to which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is, • oy this Resolution, authorized to acquire easements across are situated, lying and being in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and are particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mikels, Mayor `J • n L EXHIBIT "A" Assessment District 82 -1 Parcel 93, An easement for storm drain purposes in, over, upon and across the property located in City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California described as: The Northerly 15.00 feet of the Southerly 25.00 feet of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 6194, as per map recorded in Book 62, Page 62 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said San Bernardino County. Parcel 933 An easement for storm drain purposes in, over, upon and across the property located in City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California described as: The Northerly 15,00 feet of the Southerly 25.00 feet of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 6194, as per map recorded in Book 62, Page 62 • of Parcel (daps, in the office of the County Recorder of said San Bernardino County. Parcel 92C An easement for stomp drain purposes in, over, upon and across the property located in City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino. State of California described as: The Northerly 15,00 feet of the Southerly 25.00 feet of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 6194, as per map recorded in Book 62, Page 62 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said San Bernardino County. Parrel n30 An easement for store drain purposes in, over, upon and across the property located in City of Rancid Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California described as: The.. northerly 15.00 feet of the Southerly 25,00 feet of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map no. 6194, as per map recorded in Book 62, Page 62 of Parcel ;laps, in the office of the County Recorder of said San ® Bernardino County. Parcel 101A 10 An easement for storm drain purposes in, over, upon and across the property located in City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as: The Westerly 25.00 feet of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 6544, as per map recorded in Book 56, Pages 63 and 64 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said San Bernardino County. i • • ' Parcel 102 An easement for storm drain purposes in, over, upon and across the property located in City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as: Parcel A The Easterly 25.00 feet of the Westerly 126.00 feet of that portion of Lots 12 and 13 of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, records of the County Recorder of said San Bernardino County described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Lot 13; thence North 00" 18' 00" West, along the Westerly line of said Lots 13 and 12 a dis- tance of 1061.60 feet; thence South 890 39' 57" East, parallel with the Southerly line of said Lot 13 to the East line of said Lot 12; thence Southerly along the East line of said Lots 12 and 13 to the Southeast corner of said Lot 13; thence North 890 39' 57" West along the South line of said Lot 13 to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom the Southerly 525.00 feet thereof. • Parcel B That portion of Lot 13 of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, records of the County Recorder of said San Bernardino County described as follows: 11 Beginning at the Northeast corner of Parcel A hereinabove described; thence, Easterly along the South line of Parcel Map Number 6194 as recorded in Book 62, Pages 62 to 66 in- 1usive of Parcel Maps in said Recorders office a distance of 30.00 feet; thence Southwesterly in a direct line to a point in the Easterly line of said Parcel A distant Southerly thereon 30.00 feet from the point of beginning; thence North along said East line 30.00 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 236 • An easement for road and public utility purposes in, over, upon and across the property located in City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as: That portion of Lot 34, Rochester, as per map recorded in Book 9, Page 20 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said San Bernardino County described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 34; thence, South 89° 46' 53" West along the South line of said Lot 220.11 feet; thence North 53° 03' 18" East 116.98 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 320.00 feet; thence North- easterly along said curve through a central angle of 52° 52' 12" an arc lenath of 295.28 feet to a tangent line; thence North 000 11'-06" East along said tangent line 5.77 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 34; thence South 00° 11' 06" West along the East line of said Lot 329.96 feet to the point of beginning. • • _,I U C � • ' Parcel 248 An easement for road and public utility purposes in, over, upon and across the property located in City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as: • The Northerly 60.00 feet of that portion of the Southwest one - quarter of Section 18, Township 1 South, Range 6 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the official government survey thereof, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Government Lot 3, of said Southwest one - quarter; thence South along the East line of said Government Lot 3, 230 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said South- west one - quarter 200 feet; thence North parallel with the East line of Goverment Lot 3, 230 feet to the North line of said Southwest one - quarter; thence 'dest along said North line 200 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 290 Parcel A An easement for storm drain purposes in, over, upon and across the property located in City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Ber- nardino, State of California, described as: A strip of land 25.00 feet in width lying within Lot 26 in Section 14, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to maps of Cucamonga Fruit Lands recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said San Bernardino County the North line of said strip of land being described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Lot 26 distant Southerly thereon 182.38 feet from the Northeast corner of said Lot; thence Westerly parallel to the North line of said Lot 615.00 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line of the existing San Bernardino County Flood Control property known as Deer Creek Channel. Parcel B • An easement for road and public utility purposes in, over, upon • and across the property located in City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as: A strip of land 20.00 feet in width lying within Lot 23 and 26 in Section 14, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to maps of Cucamonga Fruit Lands recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said San Bernardino County the centerline of said strip being described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Lot 23 distant Northerly thereon 5.00 feet from the Southeast corner of said Lot 23; thence North 89" 35' 33" West parallel to the South line of said Lot 23 a distance of 307.05 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 00° 24' 47" West 187.24 feet to the North line of Parcel A hereinabove described. • • RESOLUTION NO, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS OF IM- PROVEMENT IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, did publicly open, examine and declare all sealed proposals or bids for doing the work and improvements described in its Resolution of Intention, which Resolution and a "Report" subsequently approved, :re hereby expressly referred to for a description of said work and improve- ment, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District ") NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this City Council hereby rejects all of said proposals or 6idsexcept that herein mentioned, and does hereby awared • the construction contract for doing said work and making improvements in the Assessment District to the lowest responsible bidder, to -wit: BONADIMAN- MCCAIN, INC. at the prices named in the bid of said bidder on file with the transcript of these proceedings and open for public inspection. SECTION 3: That this award of contract is hereby conditioned upon and madesubject to the receipt of monies from the sale of bonds. SECTION 4: That the works of improvement shall be constructed in the manner and form as set forth in the plans and specifications for these Droceddings, as previously approved as a part of the "Report ", as required by law and specifically the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, SECT_ON 5: That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Agreement for the works of improvement relating to said A.ssessrient District on behalf of the City, and a copy of said Agreement shall be on file with the transcript of these proceedings. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 215t day of July, 1982. ,, • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • RESOLUTION N0. q J ( 3 J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND MAKING AWARD FOR SALE OF BONDS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REDEMPTION FUND FOR THE PAYMENT OF SAID BONDS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has heretofore instituted and conducted proceedings under the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain public works of improvement, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "); and WHEREAS, in the Resolution of Intention it was determined and declared that bonds should issue under the provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code • of the State of California; and WHEREAS, there has now been received, in proper form, a proposal for the purchase of said bonds to issue under said proceedings, and said proposal received is considered to be the bid that would best serve the interests of owners of land included within the Assessment District and should be accepted. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the written proposal and bed received from Stone & You ngbe rq for the purchase of improvement bonds representing unpaid assessments in said _ Assessment District is hereby accepted and approved. SECT10 :1 3: That said sale is subject to all the terms and con- dition; as set forth in tho previously approved Notice of Sale of said bonds and in the accepted bid. SECTION n: That the. Treasurer by, and hereby is, directed to have the hnnds printed in:nlediately upon the expiration of the cash collection period, and said Treasurer shall then have said bonds signed and delivered to said bidder upon receipt of the amount of monies due pursuant to said • bid and upon the performance of all the conditions as set forth in the written offer. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 5: That the interest rate or rates on said bonds be, and the same hereby is fixed at the rate or rates as set forth in said accepted bid proposal. SECTION 6: That the Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to keep a redemption fund designated by the name of the proceedings, into which he shall place all sums received for the collection of the assessments and the interest thereon, together with all penalties, if applicable, thereon and from which he shall disburse such funds upon presentation of proper coupons. Under no circumstances shall the said bonds or interest thereon be paid out of any other fund except as provided by law. SECTION 7: That said fund shall be known as "REDEMPTION FUND FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0, 82 -1" SECTION 8: That the Treasurer shall transfer monies as necessary fron the Special Reserve Fund in the manner and form as authorized by law. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • • 0 nTTV nC n e Tin LTA OT TPA Mnt l/_ A Ordinance No. 180 will eliminate drainage fees within the area of Assessment District 82 -1 and remove the provisions of Ordinance No. 111 setting up the Special Drainage Impact Zone within the Assessment District boundary. First reading of this Ordinance was held at the July 7, 1982 meeting. Second reading at this time would be appropriate when the Council proceeds with Assessment District 82 -1. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council adopt Ordinance No. 180 following formation of Assessment District 82 -1. Respectfully submitted, LBH:bc Attachments STAFF REPORT DATE: July 21, 1982 0' rl: T0: City Council and City Manager "�_ _ 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Revision to Drainage Fee Ordinance for Area of Assessment District 82 -1 Ordinance No. 180 will eliminate drainage fees within the area of Assessment District 82 -1 and remove the provisions of Ordinance No. 111 setting up the Special Drainage Impact Zone within the Assessment District boundary. First reading of this Ordinance was held at the July 7, 1982 meeting. Second reading at this time would be appropriate when the Council proceeds with Assessment District 82 -1. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council adopt Ordinance No. 180 following formation of Assessment District 82 -1. Respectfully submitted, LBH:bc Attachments • ORDINANCE NO. 1 = Ct AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING RESCISSIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN ORDINANCES RELATING TO DRAINAGE REGULATIONS IN THE CITY The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose: The City has initiated proceedings for the construction of certain drainage improve- ments, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in a special assessment district in a certain portion of the City, said special assessment district known and designated as Assessment District No. 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "), and upon the successful confirmation of the assessments and award of construction contract for the drainage improvements within said Assessment District, certain previously adopted ordinance provisions can either be rescinded or amended, inasmuch as the Assessment District construction would be accomplishing the improvements to be financed by said drainage fees. SECTION 2: Rescission: That upon the successful award, • execution of contract, and posting of all required bonds for the com- pletion of the improvements in the Assessment District, all provisions of Ordinance No. 111 are hereby rescinded, and said Ordinance shall no longer have any force or effect. ll SECTION 3: Amendment: That upon a successful award, execu- tion of the construction contract, and posting of all required bonds for the completion of the improvements in the Assessment District, all properties within the boundaries of the Assessment District shall be exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 112. Ordinance No. 112 is hereby amended to so provide that upon the execution of contract for the Assessment District, and posting of the required performance bonds, all properties within the boundaries of said Assessment District shall not be subject to the fees and conditions of this Ordinance. This Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect for all other properties, except for those within the boundaries of said Assessment District. SF.CTIDN 4: The `layor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall ca u:: the s.une to be. published within fifteen (15) days after its oassane at least once in The Daily Report., a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of rnta rio, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982, 0 P- I C I 1 U ORDIAANLE NO. 111 AN ORMIXICE OF THE CITY CDONCti. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAY.oNCA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL DRAINACE IMPACT ZONE 5041H OF THE SANTA FE RAILROAD TO ARROW ROUTE BETt'EEA HAVEN An MILLIKEN AVENTES, AND REQL'IRIn DETAILED ENGINEERING STUDIES AND MITIGATION MEASURES IA CDANECTION THEREWITH. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, data ordain as follows: SECTIOA 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose In recognition of the existence of unique drainage problem creating potential hazards to public health, safety, and property, the City Council deems it appropriate to establish that portion of the City bounded by: "The Santa Is Railroad on the south, Arrow Route an the north, Haven Avenue on the vest, and the alignment of Hilliken Avenue on the swat" :s a Special Drainage Impact Zone requiring special engfncering studies nd mitigations measures as a condition of the issuance of a building permit. SECTION T: Drainage Study Requirements The City Council finds that prior to the issuance of a Building permit within the Special Impact Zone boundary described in Section 1, the applicant is hereby required to submit for approval of the City Engineer a comprehensive hydrology study prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer iv the State of California. This study shall certain the following: 11 Analysis of t.illin, drainage pa[terrs and runoff quantities on The site. T. no exl sting ultimate discharge point of sfit runoff and the general downstream path of runoff. ]. The propnsed drxinale patterns and increases in Tunoff quantities genera teed by site developr..ent. 4. Proposed mitigation a a s 1. ptiver, the discharge of fnc sed atom runoff from the site including proposed utruction Of master plan facilities sufficient to mitigate downs...... damage. 5. Any other information required by the City Engineer to determino the full drainage impacts of the proposed development. SECTI.y :- I: FlndinSI N,Hu irvd fee Bpi i ldini No building permit shah L Lee ,I fur . wulln tn,• :prcial l.raap Zone `na a -.n tnc C.i tr Fnstn,:e. h.,r mass the felloving findings: 1. That the more ,iud project will net increase stern nmeff from [he sit, rxrept where acceptable drain.,, LnatlT 6•s exist to a,Id runor 1. I. Th 1 the pep tot, by r rf low -r l.ry nee -,tow related water will not cr,at,` e, Pull c nn: s.ance. I. Slut .be pr.J,t will not dies, ne Cop C•ILEala flow, in such a manner as to ad ...... 1, "ffee. duveltn .m pmprrtie s. To Z insure this finding, the city Engineer may require a drainage ceptance letter or easement from the adjacent downstream property. 4. That where on-site retention facilities have been proposed a sufficient maintenance c htr.tc hoe been a n ec,0 and secvlity posted to Insure proper maintenance of saidfacility. Minimum security for maintenance shall be $3,000 or uch ocher higher amount as set by the City Council upon recomnendatien of the City Engineer. 5. That all facilities proposed Are in conformance with City standards for design and construction. These findings will be made subject to conditions established by the City Engineer based upon the findings of the approved Drainage Study. SECTION 4 Securl o• for Cons true [ion of Required drainage Smorovements Where the findings required by SecrOn 8 are based on conditions requiting the construction of drainage Improvements, no building permit shall be issued until an agreement and bonds, letters of credit, cash deposit, or other acceptable form of security have been pasted and accepted by the City Council to insuee the construction of required facilities, SECTION 5: Drainage Fee Provisions (A) Where a building permit is sought for In addition 10 e is [ing development within the Special Drainage Zone, the building r •. ,..�.. -... — �•s•+ -•q b•! pemit shall not be issued until drainage fees under the provisions of City Ordinances have been paid for the entire developed area of the site. The developed Area shall be as defined in Section 4(c)(1) of Ordinance 75 and shall be determined by the Building Official. (b) Within the Special Drainage Impact Zone, the provisfen of Seccfon 4(c)(1) of Ordinance NO. 75 shall not apply. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shntl c e the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after it, Passage at East aura in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Onmrio, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonvq, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day 16th day of July, 1980. AYES: Frost, Mikelx, Palumbo, B'id'. Schlosser NOES: No:IF. ABSENT: NONE PI Ill+ D. ,v'rh l: <s,•r, !L y:r ATT::NT. Too ron !I »a....c ran, O,1 tY -C W —ik 0 L C 1 •ji f- • • J STAFF REPORTS ,i/�. DATE: July 21, 1982 �����5% °I TO: City Council and City Manager t� Ui _ FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer 1977 BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: VACATION OF UNNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PROJECT The vacation of the streets and alleys as shown on the attached drawing is required prior to recordation of Tracts Nos. 11934, 12044, 12045 and 12046 within the Victoria Project. These tracts are on tonights agenda for final approval. This public hearing has been continued from April 7, 1982. All posting and advertising has been completed. Streets and alleys to be vacated are unpaved at this time. The rights of way for the project will be dedicated as shown on the Tract Maps. If the tract maps listed above are not approved at tonights meeting, this public hearing should then be continued until August 4, 1982. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached Resolution vacating the unnecessary streets and alleys within the Victoria Project and authorize the City Clerk to record same. Respectfully submitt d, LBH:BK:bc Attachments • RESOLUTION NO. - '•1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OR UNNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS 14ITHIN THE VICTORIA PROJECT WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 82 -14, passed on March 3, 1982, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:30 p.m. on July 21, 1982, in the Lion's Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted . that a portion of Railroad Avenue, Victoria Street, an unnamed road and alley within the Victoria Project is unnecessary for present or prospec- tive public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Map No. V -015 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached here- to, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 3: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adootion of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • ATTEST: Lauren F1, �dasserman, City Clerk Jon 0. hike s, Mayor LEGAL V -015 STREETS TO BE ABANDONED WITHIN PHASE I • PARCEL A RAILROAD AVENUE NORTH (40.00 FEET WIDE), THE ALLEY (30.00 FEET WIDE) AND VICTORIA STREET (30.00 FEET WIDE) ALL SHOWN ON THE MAP OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20, PAGE 1 OF MAP BOOKS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, LYING EAST- ERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST 330.00 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF FILED IN THE DISTRICT LAND OFFICE. PARCEL B THE UNNAMED ROAD (66.00)FEET WIDE LYING BETWEEN THE NORTHERLY PRO- LONGATIONS OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 4 AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK J OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO • CUCAi40NGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON A NAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24 OF MAP BOOKS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY AND THE UNNAMED ROAD OR ALLEY OF UNDERTEMINED WIDTH ADJOINING BLOCK. I OF SAID CTTWANDA COLONY LANDS. 9 ---------- p F- 7j, -74 a li TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11934 V-015 t— TO BE VACATED TRACT BOU"XA-Y 7 CITY OF RA \CI -10 CUCk,%IO \GA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 21, 1982 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 82 -01 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 82-04 - LEWIS - A change of zone from A -1 Limited Agriculture) to AP (Administrative Professional) for 2.045 acres of land, for the development of 28,800 square foot, two story office building. The project site is located within the Terra Vista Planned Community area, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077- 421-06. BACKGROUND: In March of this year, the Lewis Development Company requested the City Council to amend the General Plan to allow the City to consider development within a planned community area prior to the adoption of the planned community. Attached is City Council Resolution No. 82 -57 which amended the General Plan to provide the Council with the option to consider development within a planned community area prior to adoption. The amendment also requires City Council approval with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. In addition to the request for approval of the precise development plans, the applicant is also requesting a change of zone to accommodate the development. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the zone change and the development site plans on June 23, 1982. Attached are the staff reports from the Planning Commission as well as the recommendations from the Commission. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the change of zone and approval of the site development plans based upon the recommended conditions of approval. ANALYSIS: The General Plan Amendment indicates that review of development prior to approval of a planned community is limited to a one -time only basis and shall not encompass more that 5% of 50 acres of the planned community area, whichever is less. The project site is 2.045 acres and is less than 1% of the total area of the planned community. The requested change of zone is consistent with General Plan as well as the proposed Land Use Plan for the planned community. The Planning Commission and the Design Review Committee spent a considerable amount of time with the applicant in the development of the final plans. The Planning Commission is recommending approval of �1 July 21, 1982 Staff Report Subj: Zone Change 82- 01 /D.R. 82 -04 - Lewis Page 2 the site development plans contingent upon adoption of the conditions of approval contained within the Planning Commission Resolution. The Commission also found no significant adverse impacts upon the environ- ment and has recommended issuance of a negative declaration by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council approve Zone Change No. 82 -01 by adoption of the attached Ordinance. In addition, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of Development Review No. 82 -04 by adopting a motion to approve the conditions of approval contained with the Planning Commission Resolution No. 82 -64. Respec fully psub fitted, • JACK LAM, AICP, Director of Community Development • JL:MV: kap Attachments: City Council Resolution No. 82 -57 Proposed Ordinance Planning Commission Staff Report for Zone Change 82 -01 Planning Commission Staff Report for Development Review 82 -04 • F C RESOLUTION NO. 02 -57 A RESOLLTTON OF III: CITY COP.:CIL OF THE CM OF _ WCN0 CUCAIM)NGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE + - ADOPTED LA. \L USE ELEMENT OF THE MICHO CUGVIOAOA GENERAL PLAN 4 WHEREAS, the City Council has activated the optional General •• Plan Amendment cycle; and WHEREAS. tie City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to cans ider all comment. on the proposed General Plan Amendment. NOV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the f011.ving am<ndnencs to the land use clement of the General Plan. SECTION 1: General Plan Amendment No. 82 -01 -A: Under the first policy statement, paragraph B of he Land Use Element (page 30) shall be changed to read as follow: "The City shall net generally consider for approval, amv development plans located Within the Planned Communities area, until such time as the Planned Community has bee. relieved sad adopted by the City C ... oil. However, the City may approve minor excepti.ns to chic pallcy, if En Ste Judgeneal, the plans a e eonsiaeent of ch the Planned community and General • lan Goals ", This exception atoll be limited to ( one time only per planned community area and shall 3L encompass more than 52 or 50 acres of the planned c mmunity area, whichever is less. Final an t. vat on denial of any proposed development or development plans submitted far approval under this caption shall be made by the City C..0011 on recp- mmendati.o of the Planning Commission. SEOIIGN 2: General Plan Anend,mant No. 82 -01 -C: An amendment of the Cenerai Pla.1 Land Use yap In the area north of 4th Screccexmndtng approx :. -a to b, 1400' of be Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe railroad tracks and vest of Etivanda Avenuo as shown on attached Fxhibic eA ". This area shall be shave on he General Plan as General Industrial Land Use. SECTION B: A Nrga[tvo Daclaettfon is hereby adapted for these GcnerIl Plan a-endments, based upon the eomptotion and ftnd to Cs of the Initial I PAS:;ED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of March, 1982. A1'F.S: Frost, Mlkc Ls, PaluoM1o, ➢ride., S <hln war NJ::::: None LA05L::T: N.ec j: Phi L. r O. ec_ hIII'Ll, ;LSwr ATTI.ST; �C = ah,�,!✓t_,� Cl[y Clark . ORDINANCE N0, I S AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1077- 421 -06 FROM A -1 TO A -P FOR 2.045 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN, BET4IEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. • B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessors Parcel No. 1077- 421 -06 consisting of 2.045 acres, generally located on the east side of Haven, between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street, is re- zoned from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to A -P (Adminis- trative /Professional). SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shat cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES; NOES: ABSENT: I...1 • n STAFF REPORT F 19ii � DATE: June 23, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 82 -01 - LEWIS - A change of zone from A -1 Limited Agriculture to AP (Administrative Professional) for 2.045 acres of land within the Terra Vista Planned Community located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077- 421 -06. Related Files: Development Review 82 -04 Parcel Map 7373 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is approximately two acres located on the east side of Haven within the Terra Vista Plan- ned Community, approximately 500 feet south of the intersection of Deer Greek and Haven Avenue. The site is presently a vineyard with no other significant forms of vegetation. The General Plan indicates the area as office land use. The Planned Community also designates the site as office park. The intent of the proposed zone change is to allow development of office headquarters for the Lewis Company. ANALYSIS: The City Council authorized the filing of this zone change and the processing of the office building through an amendment of the General Plan which would allow consideration of this project prior to final approval of the Planned Community. Consideration for consistency with the proposed Planned Community Land Use Map and General Plan Land Use Map is required. The change of zone, which is an Administrative Professional zone, is consistent with the Land Use Map of both the Planned Community and the General Plan. The proposed use anticipated for this site, as shown in the develop- ment plans submitted under DR 32 -04, are consistent with the requested none. ENVIRONMENTAL RF:VIEW: Attached is Part I of the Initial Study, which has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. ITE.'•1 c C � Zone Change 82 -01 /Lewis Planning Commission Agenda June 23, 1982 Page 2 FACTS FOR FINDING: The subject property is suitable in terms of size an shape to allow for adequate access and development of the parcel for com- patibility with proposed uses in the immediate vicinity. The change of zone is consistent with the General Plan, as well as the proposed Terra Vista Planned Community, and the change will not cause significant adverse impact, upon the environment or surr..inding property. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised in the newspaper as a public hearing, as well as notices sent to property owners within 300' of the boundaries of the project. To date, no correspondence has been received regarding this project. • RECO'I'AENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all elements of the project. If, after such consider- ation, the Commission can support the facts for finding, then adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. • Uspectful Lv submitted, RICK GO ?iEZ C tv Planner RQ:MV:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Part I Initial Study Resolution • "l C , 51NGLE F6MIL'� EKItiT'� RETENTION BASIN INVUi7tizlaL pA�� CG•P) I %I.00� coNfaot -. I uTILITY cort,b• j �� VINEYARDS Ertt�iTlwG , rr DATA cl; C NDESIGN BUILDINGS IG-L � II Q.F� 0 ExISTIN4 � VIRGINIA DARE WINERY LIJ % 4,60 bENi1T�( -o � Izy�IVeN-flo.L_ 0 0 � I p� %�-- iusJF.cT I (4 •P• � J ExISTIN4 ; FaRMII,+a GARGGB %, CS •P• ) GoMMUNITY GoMME�GIAL FaoTwl. -t- F>LVD. •--- F-v 0 N � loco e wo aoa 5[ALE.I�n dOOl L6<,aNO ` ZONE GHANGr-r CG•P•)— �GEµ��•L p�"�'N <«or.t A-1 7o A-P" • CITY OF RANCHO CUCMfOKGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Enviro =rental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects recui. ring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Envircnmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) day=_ before the p',:blic meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the pronosed project. • PROJECT TITLE: THE LEWIS BUILDING APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Lewis Development Co., 1156 N. Nountain Ave.. P. 0. Box 670. Upland, CA 91786. 71 - 955 -09i NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Richard Lewis LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AN-D ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 7957 ;iaven Avanue _ 1077-4-'L-06 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: _ CCWD (;nwrr end w•itn r) San iic rn ardino County Soil Erosion and Dua Control Uis[r ict (dust a6a terient), Foothill Fire District. T -( r`1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 2 with parking and landscaping. office building (plus basement) ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 25,600 sq. ft. building (approx. 80' X 160' X 2 story) proposea on Z.04 . site. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONJ'3NAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION 02 ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SFiEE:S): Tano: 2 -3E N -S Slope Plants: No trees (except grape vines) on site and sma11 associated structures exist to the south of the site.) Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No Y- 2 - cl WILL THIS PROJECT: . YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X A. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: • 4. Change existing zoning from A -1 to A -P to conform to the — General Plan designation of off ice.' IMPJRTA=1 : If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnishe above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and inforr..ation presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulat'ion can be ma a by the Dev ppent Review Committee. Date January 29, 1982 signature ' Title uthorized Agent 1] RESOLUTION NO. 82 -63 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMPASSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 32 -01 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM A -1 TO A -P FOR 2.045 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET - APN 1077- 421 -06 WHEREAS, on the 29th day of January, 1982, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of June, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings; 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and • 2. That the proposed zone change would not have signifi- cant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and • 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan and proposed Terra Vista Planned Community. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on June 23, 1982. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65350 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucirionga hereby recommends approval on the 23rd day of June, 1982, Zone Change No. 32 -01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 32 -01. `l � Pane 2 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and re- • lated material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 1982. PLAi1NI0 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: rl,f ✓r�i�i1 !MGl oerrrey Ning, una rryan 1; ATTEST: A "^'2wu%�' ✓-: -,.� ..... _ Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK' LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of June, 1982, by the following vote -to- wit: • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Stout, McNiel, Barker, Rempel, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None n LJ J E • 10 m nn n nvn IT 11 nnrnw,n n STAFF REPORT 4ir r ten � I DATE: June 23, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 82 -04 LEINIS - The development of a 28,800 square foot two -story office building on 2.045 acres of land currently zoned A -1 (AP zone change pending) in a portion of the Terra Vista Planned Community area on the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, south of Church Street - APN 1077- 421 -06. Related Files: Zone Change 82 -01 Parcel Map 7373 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: This request is for a proposal to con- struct a two -story 28,800square foot office building to be located within the Terra Vista Planned Community on the east side of Haven, between Foothill and Church Street. The office site is approximately two acres and is part of a larger office complex. The Applicant is seeking specific approval for the one office building. A conceptual layout of the remaining part of the office park is shown. The site is presently a vineyard and contains no other significant vegetation. It is presently zoned A -1 with a zone change to AP (Administrative Professional) pending. The development proposes to install all associated parking, landscaping, street improvements and access that will be necessary for the function of the site. The General Plan designates office usage in this area as well as the proposed Terra Vista Planned Community, which indicates the area as an office park. Because of some hardships associated with the Applicant's present office lease, they are presenting this for review and approval prior to adoption of the Planned Community text for Terra Vista. ANALYSIS: The project has been reviewed by the Development Review Committee and the Grading Committee and has undergone appropriate changes as a result of their review. The project is consistent with the current development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and those proposed within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Access to the site will be primarily from Haven Avenue. The northerly access will be for emergency access only and is proposed to be con- structed in turf block. The Applicants have shown a conceptual master plan of the entire office park area. The conceptual plan is shown ITEM D Develomient Review 82 -04 /Lewis Planning Commission Agenda • June 23, 1982 Page 2 only to indicate how the remaining part of the site can be developed into an office park. The shapes, sizes, and placement of the other office buildings on the site are only conceptual and not final. The General Plan Amendment, which allowed the processing of this project, requires that final approval or denial of the project be made by the City Council on recommendation of the Planning Commission. Therefore, the attached Resolution is a recommedation to the City Council. DESIGN REVIEW: The Design Review Committee has reviewed several different architectural designs for this office building. The Committee was concerned that the use of the smooth stucco and the rough stucco would not provide a distinct difference. It is the Committee's recommendation that a recognizable difference be achieved between the two materials. Therefore, the Committee has recommended that prior to the issuance of Building Permits, samples of the final materials be submitted to the Planning Division for final review and approval. ENVIRON'4ENTAL REVIEW: Attached is Part I of the Initial Study, which has • been completed by the Applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and has provided the Commission with the attached recommended Conditions of Approval. Based upon the recommended Conditions of Approval and evaluation of the Environmental Checklist, staff finds no significant adverse impacts on the environment. Therefore, a recommendation to the City Council for the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. FACTS FOR FINDING: The use as well as the design of the building and site Ts in accordance wwith the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance, the General Plan, and the proposed Planned Community text far Terra Vista. In addition, the use together with the Conditions recommended herein, will not be detri- mental to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the public or properties in the immediate vicinity. RECOM'4ENDATiON: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Com- mission can support the facts for findings and recommended Conditions of Approval, then adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. submitted, ty tlanner :HV:jr Attachments • �' � � � -`�� _ �_ _ _. _ _ � _ - -- i i.�n ` k ,F� �- * i �� ��� � �, �� —_ I ,� �% / �� _ r �.. -. �� �_ �'�hsa .- _ .. �� �\ � -- �.- �� '� � `'"" srr_s�araa do��a c�>>���u�r� pnrar,� rac�r��ea �� <G'6JC�G^G.G�dL7[r r,L�a �� 4p v 8. I 1 I a I—) I 1 r Pi 1-1� I O 0 0 0 I y i i In i I i Lj 1 11111 144 n u' • 4? Od�M�SPCQQ40MC �04C� pf�La nM • A t M J 7 • I r) r 0 0 0 • CPI/- I r,77 . .......... ... .... .... ... . . % CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN xv • Sf 11 Lil C -7 • 1-1\ L C RESOLUTION NO. 82 -64 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 82 -04, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE A -1 ZONE, A -P PENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, on the 1st day of February, 1982, a complete appli- cation was filed by Lewis Development Company for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of June, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above- described project. NO'.J, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and • 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially in- jurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on June 23rd, 1982. SECTI ;.I 3: That Development Review No. 82 -04 is approved subject tr, the following condition, and attached standard conditions: P1_AMI!11NG DIVISION 1. A sample of the final building materials shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior • to issuance of building pernits. 1 L $U C1011 iA. Page 2 2. This approval shall not waive compliance with the • final adopted Planned Community Text for Terra Vista. 3. This approval is subject to adoption of a change of zone from A -1 to A -P by the City Council. Zone Change 82 -01 shall be approved by the City Council prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Parcel Map No. 7373 shall be approved, recorded and all conditions met, prior to occupancy of building. S. This project falls within the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Area. Any participation by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency on this project, will require review and approval of the development plans by the Agency. 6. This project requires review and approval by the City Council, ENGI ?LEERING DIVISION 7. The access at the north oroperty line shall be used for temporary fire access only. It shall be closed when future development takes place. • S. An occupancy permit shall not be issued until San Bernardino County Flood Control releases "Temporary Easement" for Haven Avenue. 9. An occupancy permit shall not be issued until com- pletion of the Deer Creek Channel to Highland Avenue or unless othenoise authorized by the Planning Commission. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JIME, 1982. PLANNING MIMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Je f re Chair6ian 1 ATTEST: ---LV ..r�r.�.- Secretary of the Planning Commission Resolution No. 82 -64 / Page 3 ( l • I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of June, 1982, by the following vote -to- wit: • n \J AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Barker, Nc Niel, Stout, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSUIT: COMMISSIONERS: None 0 OEPARTMENt Of CUIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS SubJttl: — Y-e--,-,�1� -Q� Apel pant 1]J� -. - -- Larattoo: LL Those Those Items Checked are Conditions of apprOVal. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE POLLWING CONDITIONS. A. Srte oevel_pmont 1. Site shall be developed In accordance With the nppreved site plans on me in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. pC'ised site plans Intl building elelatlons fnC.11clating all conditians or approval shall be sutmitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance df Y building permits. J. 1-C111.111 of this rrques[ shall not waive compliance with All secb ohs of the Zonino prdfnance and all otter applicable City Ord inences In effect at time of Baiiding Permit Issuance. 4. The developer shall provide ell lots Hith adequate sideyard area far Recreation Vehicle storagr pursuant to City standards. 5. Trash recd Lac le areas Fall be enclosed by a 6 feet high nlson.. '%till with VIC' obstructing ;etas pursuant to Qty standards. Location shall he subject to aoprorol by the Planning Division. 6. A Sample of the roof ma[enal shalt be Subrittrd to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building PC-Its. ). All raor appurten'n-es, Is air c.rdIIA.PCr,. 'Fall be are F ite[to rally Integrated, shielded frmm view and the sound buffered from adjacent prnperti es and streets as required by the Planning and Daildto9 Divisions. X9, Friar to any use If the project ...0 or business activity being clan need tnelren, all conditians of approval cantelnee herein Snail be em,pleted to the satisfaction of pu! HICCtor of Community oevelolanent . 9. This approval shall became null and void if bun Morris rents ere not issued T� for this project within and year fro-% the date Or Project approval. lo. As a Conditional if,. rr , , this project shall brcanv n.11 and vein I011111. I:N) months trmm drat, Of approval, unless permits are issued or use arvfovm 11 localities. 11. A d•lailyd Lgnbng plan show 11 6• suhcitles t1 and api —oil by ti, PI--.1 Di"S"a aria' to isseaner of wilding pull I. Soto plan shall indicate - ...I', Ill.,. In Ilion, location, height and P11hod Or ihi el Jing. Ito IlgMSng shall Ad¢r of .(fact adjacent Drape Plies. IL All s•'-,: rg rool,.J........ ac the time of initial d"'Inp -ant shall to ,near mama. IJ. Tr •tv i;rd rr<s [run wth.,Ays ac'16 clrcolabin ...IC, smll be 11ovided P"OvIl 'It t e N T e ee. oenI to concept d +el l'all wi to open s,%ces And recreeticnalmes. Project M1, 14. All trash Dick up '11%11 bat for indiv,dbwl umt dth all r er uc:es shoal add frown Public rlev, it now CCntrallred he'll rece:la Clez a.r, erov, ors. _ 15. Standard Dario corer old,, sha11 be sv,Gd tv and a,P,C.ad by the City y Planner and Building pfficlal prior Lo occur my or lOn IC't u -A- 16. All building's members and ind,etd.ial v,I,, wall be Ceeattfiednln • clear and concise man mCloding lrppee llemmat'an. , 1). Solid core [alerlor doers, se urlty dead MIts An, lots, yCall b, SC,t. on each unit in this Drojectc Tied 18. Security devices vch %s wlnee% Ions 'bowl) be Installed on each .,it 19. All units v-ithin this dove lolsnent shall be PrePlumbed to be adapted far a Soler ester hating u,it. Enrgy conserving nu;le'ng -„t "ti al, a r >(u,rez e�^ incorporated into thv Protect t, ira v -raze n tin -,; s Fa t I, m, vd till rMUree c r..Pu nn sea "" brow d', !,fair act" If Inalap on, double Dined wt odes. ea teas ^d mrrn"1'- 1010111 ar:.l lances. e!,. — 21. Maier dheatl^ ^nt 11.11 Drp Vide ac. aptioa to hr-1 tuyerz to Pdithale a Solar unit. 22. l Eme.grncy secenee.. sec ss ,hall br r• ±v,•e ^- b this teat to the utis- faction f the Foothill dire Protection Olstnct. 23. local sin Poster Pla nod rn' -e t ,i tr art in orda, stn [lr loan Fe rrvv n -.j tip. rt ter trait et an -di rV a 1. It Plan r, e.. tl. ^ am .,Pre c carhop .; C.ns. .: -.- ar....�� be skin, tteE to lend air: o`mneean t+ Cp etreat n ^a. s,. shall ecamdtson ei the final dap. y ter City planner 'prior t approval and 24. This tract shall ram or tartar: Le a CmtC.AnCe district to, mnntrnence of oq,rstr ion trails. 25. vbret now •. show 11 Fe r and n ...I F` Ito tie adr,Od Street ritamcg Pala I. D^er to aerrcvnl3e nit re in t,Cn Of nee the final map. car ea Plan I 26. If fail drvrlo:rent coo- -e' t1 mil. a _,I .•1 to lrr:irC Inu er r: os,to r�:P oy 3 •vow n^t Fr subuitted to slid 'oil wee c. to Pty 'I­­, 1 " e;p one of fi 1 oar. - I, r . n to i). In iz Dm}rtt ,na 11 Dr ^, iJr C( ae,_,.,plr ins / -. Fn en riot 'eCt,`tia 1 - -11I _ .. t d t.�,.?I,.�.51:a it tY IF, bar of c -ell tllo Or e.. - -•n "-I, at r. ^m Pee :n We O rlavv p er ,1 Ss. tote p3 eu,:ew sell be ru ttr Psi g Tema,. ] .4L.'lutx• A to i, 1. r.11 r r,l Inl Ix nC gar•, :;Tan -3 : ^.II r e d,nansien nl 5' "And SFdll [an la in do 14- ,Ali ,, 3 n i + w, '! :r +[rte fa. ma ,:all., Pacing rot tress shall be A min, uo Is sour, s.. e. • • • ]. *.-.y aisle widths shaft be a mn,mun of 26 feet wide. • a, tmrrorncy dries, shall hr provided, maintenance free and clear, a a nuns, nil id loos. wide at all lines clean, construction in accordance with foothill Y fire District .... irenrnts. X5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with aotma tic garage door openers. ]. Dezigmted visitor parking areas shall be turr blocked. _ o. lisp Covenants, Codes and Restrictions shall retail act the storage of recreational ehicl es on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. _ 9. It. parking Shall be perndtted within the Interior cfrcllatimh x4l, other than in designated visitor parking arras Covenants, Codes, and Restrrtions ,ball be developed by tie applicant Intl submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building pemits. f, adz ra ping 1. A detailed landzupe and lrrigallon plan shall he snlnitted to and approved by the Plaaning Dlvlshon prior to the issuance or building p¢nni ts. L Mating trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of Nling (errs zlm+dng their pmehe location, z n ,` and 1, shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take Into account the proposed gentling, what beet a ¢ e In be retained. trinnin, methndS. and vl+ere new trees will be planted for replacement of r+ cored trees. she plan is required to be Sub itted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval or the final grad lag plan. 1 Steel U'er s, a -n vesm of 15 gallon site or larger. Shall be installed in ar, n rdana se lh cave Kister plan or Street trees for the City or loathe Cucamonga and shall be planted At an average of every 30' on interior streets and 2D' on exterior streets. a. A m m of 50 trees 91, gross acre. crog"ized of the following lIIII. Shall +sae provided within the development: 205 -24" box or larger, 2o: -IS to gallon, end lo[ -S gallon. A 5. A11 landscaped areas shall he maintained in a healthy and thriving ton - Tr is [ion, free fre. ineedl, tre5h. and debris. 6. All ,lore banks in excess of five (5) feet in vertical helnht and of 5:1 or greater ,lane shall be Inndzcened and o-rigaled Inn ord,nce with store planting requirements of the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Such shire v1seting shall ,.ociudn but udl bf limited to ..Led grp and r r am) appron. III, anrode and tree,. All Inch planting and Irrigation stills be crabs, +sty maintained i a beallhy and thriving condition by tlw developer until each divilaal unit i sold and .,cooled by the buyer. rotor to e,I..nh.g occacaaey for dole unit,. an Inspection of the slopes Iball be emitted M Um Planning Staff to determine that It is In satizfactnry condltioe. L- An pn+r.ayz. drrn 11,11, and land 11,fi, shall br folly ^lu1L,on d Iy a -- I,c n -rz association or other r en accrntl tilt to use sale. Sn.b t ^elf oar mtl -llal 'all be w1nille4 a. the City prior to issuance of band.., fCrmh l[. _ S. lac frret are land,111ing, and an appropriate forigsthn tys«m, dull be I nsWnib by tl•e developer In accordance with ShshiIIeu Planar 2 prolGC[ :m. 9. Tee final design Of ta. pen lip ter pa r:an yt. wall, landscaping and slde- .alks SNIT be inclodrd as u.e rCr. rte landscape plans and still be svb]ect to approval by the Plamm�gl Davis,,.. X lo. r. min imu or �(J f of the trees planted eienm the project. Shall he + lo'cimenms lte CrGPS. 11. SPeclal tandsca[r leisure, su -h as rv5urd+ng, alluvial vats, species,. Its trees, meandering z.dp...11, (botn vertical an.! -hr•;p a1 ebangel and intensified landscaping. is required along ,�1jAYF D. S" _ 11. Any signs pmcetel for this dua.!n..,eet shall M des nM in eenlormhuv pith tlm cmprehwn ive Sign plilled ^and :nett r gu o� nwev and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation ofe such rsigns- __ 2. A u m ......el dm fee that drvnl ot'nnl Shill be Sub+i"'.d td the Planning Division for their rev... and approval prior to Issuance of 9r aiding permig. ]. The Signs indicated on tee zpl•n•Oed plan, are unit ,,,..d with this approval and wan ..guile seoaratr live review and ..Prow 1. E. Additional 1ROrnval s_ Rrg +n• ere 1. orm lommeit t Review shall to a lovelaizned Prior m the issuance a( a Doting prrmlt. _ 2. Drveld"u n6 reels. shall be a""I Is Md prior to .....st"On of the final 5a111a¢ ion map. ]. Approval or Tentstise Tract no- _ -_ -_ S saran: ^e do It m "n, d"Ororal a. This Coalitional l".e ru,,it it 9raTM for a p ^, of egn t h(t) al which bare slit planning Conan aSSlon ray ad] or axle to conii trans or revo k[ the Condltl on at Ilse so st. 5. lbr eeveloper is re d to e r Polls,,. ^a 'in"! +e1 -rat b, InsclaIT11 or h1-1 nh.cllh have aan+.a [e or ouhl5t ecuntrian trail on or adjacent to their proper ty. In purcn,zsna the bv-c heave, n. l-1 Loa on i b.e +r 41 trip C.C. t e: s a ", lost said -Cef - :Stitt to a "It'll r cioroul t for the purpose o alln++ns eg eslr.an tr)fllc to gam access. , Signed_______ - Sn+d State mrnt is to be filed by It" developer wqh the City prior to occ.pa.". 6. p+ el to al a",i + •y - Ise+ all all c.t ,nil ^ gal] I + +t :sad 1.- I's, +n eel n( tr- sill!. 11-CO: ♦ "it's it'• .n`+h , -nil e nil. b.a or rill be C + ^Ie of d ^along , .-ls •.I•n. rave. levy l.•.. p- nil ^. I.r• web I I111 of Cer b r +cation _,,I blip tern + uM >+ V • St • ^I pIsL sit stn In ,y (Cgl ears 'I'd, w In anal nor a .n in ve c or care Inn. a+•+s=cn rid Or issuance or pe.n4s +n the C611 of an other re toratiat ett ). A w f file final ,nap, be i o. In Ire lsspance P, I 'm In approval and r ..lot it o pr -- of i,vilring Permits Allen me map i valved, written nrliffulfun from the afrrrtel 'eater district. Ib,t adrgw(e ,rem' and wafer fatiltact All r AM Fn iilahle tp ton 11-111 -d 1`1n3rtt• 51'mll be "d—I1M to live DrP.p 4;lht of (rn•p,nil, Ohn"Inon's, i, Full, left', melt h.mr lo,n i ..... of by vale- Ji• ,i thin Sixty (hp) days Pri r to linll n non rnl on ra.r Pf 'uhnf,"'te„ or l TL4a14e of veeit, in the tA,., of ,Alin n lhAln revidential projects. For projects using 11PLIt tank fanlvies at by the Santa mm Pempmal Nate. control board am the C ill. .n'file. e, l lficallon of uric. Lalul LLy, incta6in9 ell ISHAdertive infprma[i on, shall be obta,ncd and ssJe,itted to the City. P. T11s al"n'll shall hetewn poll and void If the tentative hdiv' n map -- Is mt ., I'prevrd and rrennhrd or bit ildmn permits i sell v p man, is Involved, with'. t,.Plve U:) noodle fr. the alplAsal of thin I'rolett mass an eafnnsion has been granted by the Planning Ervwamllion. 9. This scbJ,dISf AA v S net SAM hied a A total devnlnry"en[ Parka Se and is _ rrgui na to .'apply fur, A point rating relative to il, design Section of file G,onth Kineg'n,ent ordinance Prior to final anpr'oval and retardation of the map If [he subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. AP(t ICP'il SMALL CONTACT T,E BUILDING OIYISIOU FOR COMPLIANCE WITH Tilt FOLLOWING CMPITIO.6: F. S'tr nPvel oyrgM I. the a,,M1eant stud clailly with tilt• latest adopted Uni roan Aunding Conn. Uni Porn Ilauanical Code, boifonn Plunbmq Code. Mtlonal Electric Code, and All she, applh.,Mn codes and efdinancei in effect at the time or lsspance If relative permits. X 2. Rl.r to Issuance of Luildm9 remits for red lLple romiruc titre, evidence SO 11 he sid —Und to the Foothill District Fire Chief that lrmpnary Ater supply for fife protection is available. Pending Completion of regmred fire protection systems. 3. Pri , to file i of A building Permit for A in,. ralld-lill dulling mt(s) or ma3ar addition In 'sting uni[(sl, the applicant sWJI PAY de:clop cnt fees At the estabhsled rate. Such fees may include, but not be ilnitrd to: City Cravli ri ca [ion Fee, Park Fee, Dia-I" I,,, Systrme Oevelore,.1 fee• Pr,mlt and Plan Checking Fees. and SchaIl Fees. a. Cri r In Abe issuance of a building permit for a new co er ins o industrial lapplicant develnnen[ o addition to a ist ia9 develo,vent the shall pay develn,r,,t feet at the established rate. Such fees may include, bit 'm[ be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 5. Street .,d.essn Shall be .''prided by the building official. S. fire retardant mateal and r Q'elling Alit, shall to ..... VUCled .!Ill fire - tnmaASlrble roof mote, hal 1. All t re A.r'Ii mg; shill hive On• bu'1J'n9 1,1, Ii'a Lrt,nl tf, strut _ �. dw afdii, nal .rod in,' around windo.5 and word l"Ing a- plant - <ns rnrrf dpnrey. la te. 1, rrn.idr .lira r,lh she ruin.' n,.ildrng code in. h , trop Clearances ,.nerd .ing u.r, area and fire -resisHreness of ea+slmy Sul Ll,.Is. 2. Er :Ling hnipien,(sl tl.at% V` ,,ie to en•'ply with t„ '.,1 'I.,,ldn l . rn,mg rr]•,la t, nn, w, um. Inv coned ore or m,• a „ism gig •.Lin I ^. :. J. E.illin, [ .I” dr,pa;at (a1111nn] st+afi to 111114. tilled n,d,fie oh'P,•d to comely with the Un JO,m Plumbing Code. and Unlfarm Culldfng cone. 1) • Project fill. n. cnt�e �g 1. Leaning of the sabjerl prnoerl, in;ll Fr an at c+1, r. a •,:F fl,r On,lorm thi l J i nq CAdn, C I or Ad 1 „q StenJard1 a,A ec trpt•4 q•a A. A, P. lc t it re. 7Ee final glacial Plan sMll be ,a substantial tan lCmance with the Approved co.ceptusl "Ardinq pl An. 2. A so l z rnonit sba 11 be Greta rte by A n aI if iad en g, nee' 11Cen1ent by the State of Cali fornid to perronn such cart. 3. A gD1991 cal report shall be peas red by a a Ail,f d he 9, veer or 9so10gi It and submitted At the tie of a;Dl,,AtiDm for g,ading Dian check.. d. ]fie final y, dio, Alan shall t ,1 fo r AM + :al b Munn•J Cnnntter and shell On c[ ,Iytnn p,ler to ^]LGn e•y the final suMfvisle. mA, or issuance of building per"i; .hiyhnvn, ca- z nil. 5. As a ca stain -lot fuldivilfam, Ce fall th,, regm,, -vn[s snatl B^ reL A. Surety, 111,11 be post ^d a r —t r •tutr^ leU On of .11 ca -site drainage ra,ilit ;rr ,a -y por t ^,+•!piny All t... bell. to the satisfaction of the Build,ng ants Sale,, C, vision. b. ArArepnale re sr -note, fr, oaf✓ e.(st-'.nt p' cis r, -..nrr rtit are onducted un c.• , ae•ert r n m fs, all be Inl n seN. and recorded to the or of the full :mg a d ',let, p,v'vnn. c. On -site dratr,gr i p,n,c ^fit a,. f­ On- —r-1 sr tl,,t,,ct.A7 the saeeiv,aj Arc _ he u^ r -r In ua' of building s,,i,S a trnzlnicz-, : ,' n�c�l ost r,, to s�.hH2t to, or a ritote, to. drains ;e lie.nsre ,^3• Ira „^: or wIthm A parcel relative to winch A budding el —t'is c,,,^ trd. d. Final grading plans for rail :'+-t a,• [^ 11 - old iv .., Osvmnl And Sa foil a or ion for a[1'c.al Fill, to of building yerml ts. (This r..ay be on an ,nererentdl o, c,-;,,,c. eCes, ;�1 / A. All sle a Mnks i tf I've (5) tot i c -bt +1 P”" of 5:1 n arealer xic eas1,11 [ ^' 1 «,[n m ,, pl r[l on If g,a,n rg o r oP +r Al,� tit„r'r11••• a rel,;n•it to Corg,l' tear to Ve sal,sfen,ce of IDe ^. 'ai,i I,nyatice shall le novice.: to - na [: the lead aM ma,eta,n 9•o +L. to A point E ranch, after A_ 'na „t,. Al,Pl 1UV[ Stott. CCb1ACT TIIE E;I :lly; %G OE :is__j FCR eou LlA :CE .RN "I E FOL:9YIH6 MCI, MIS: 1. U•d,tat_nn And 1. Prditations •Lail Fn ' ad, IF i ,al it all tit '.ants- - of -,.ay soli all en... ... rn,t a, sit — r+ i,n trnt et„r .. ,. _ 2. ncd—tion shall be made of the folk, g ,1gdts of -.y on the following ltreels: A:,_ sleell 1,.l r, . -.,1 I. -1 .. [a .... ..el a,,, line radius .,l] be re -1 eI :.r Cf ly I.... +rill. _ ll .w,ES of rep ¢vlv In g. a es to 14 eta 1z G�- 1 .:1 fir ^� IA:ad A r s fns ADS •__- ___ -__ K5. - C,r'c•. +I r•(I ,'ill he C 4 . n11 I' +•.Alt 1c iae.h, D—L,. er 1 ill”, a •alt t, noticed em ,',a mal or t,A II be red Arend con, .,rent Stn be rap. 0 /t 6 �v err pr^v: sfM1 :'alt Ic nildc !car tl,r "A" rr'. 1.111,5 soil in lr nal • TTT��I ole tion of any IF A, whist kill p :ed to,sdel ivery of goodar to the property nr in the elMNtlnn nr the proposed bullneel. 7. privet, di t.inanr r ,,-q, fur c n s -lot era ina9c 'ball be rcquf red And stall be dellumled or mticed son M, final map. S. All e+is ti ng a se n ants lying Within futur e ri gbt -pf -nay aie to be t, quitclaimed or to be del fneated on the map per City E,19ineer's regniremenls. A 9. rA 1 COP At, for lide.Alk for publle Pon, shall be dedieated to the City .6111 sideraiks meander through Driest. property. St e ro_ sw t t. vin ots I. Cost -[ full street imornrrmint' tnrluding. ALL not lilited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement. Sidewalk, drive appromles, Parkway trees and street lights on all Interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26-toot kid, P, .... At within a 40 -font wide dvlluted right- of -.ay Swi 11 be constructed for all half- section streets. XI. Cn,strnct the following missing improvements including, but not linil ^d In •includes landsaping and brigs Lion on meter. A a. Prior to any work being performed In the pull lc right-of-Ay. fees swill M paid and an en s ...th —ut penult stall M obUiued Inm 11, City EPgineer's Office, In addition to any other permits required. 5. Strept Int,ovement plans approved by the City [rlgineer and prepared by a Pel,stered Civil [^gin shall be require], for all strut inproronnrts, print to tssumce of an .b,P.chAbnb permit. [,Pat ell., And Profiles 'ball x1,. the location of all e.lsbog utility fatalities within the right -of -way. \J X6. SVrrty sbAll he pasted And an agreement e[rcuted to it., [.Ills!"L In Of th, City 1u ;—car and the Ctty Attorn.y, g maing c unlrt,on of the pidAic Ineprovrncnts, prior to recording rr of the map or the issuance of building permits, Whichever comes ll rs t. x1. All street impmvrnen LS shall be Installed to the satisfaction n( the �/j City Engineer, prior to oeoupancy. /V a. r"r"Ae strip,nf, !ng, baffle and sbeft n �— signing shall be Installed per th <,u r mu of um CIL, Engineer. 9. Gl:linl tl t, •sid rr9•drml re[nn:rL1IIAn 51.111 11—I 1— 'Or traffn. at wolf okra Wth adrgwtr detours dunng o: n•.b ncl m+ A Usn d "ll,t dull Im �ryvrd to cOver the lost ql g, a.i ink e.d eav l ng, wI,iih shall to refunded on completion of the most, ucldon to the satisfaction or the City Engineer. v i'r effect Lo. _ u:all.,yc still to 11.rlda'd Letveen Pu01a sidewalks aA0-site pe eltrian areal. IL Concentrated Jq snags flows stall Trot vase side.alks. Under sidewalk drelns :ball be Installed 1, coy :[..darn,. _ II. An 1—r9y cisnralnr an,far urn ... ..... Ol r.a; rrs A'11 Or ,s ill ed to it' satisfa[tapn of the City dge.... at the end Al Stub At tee is. A letter or accept once of dra male runoff from the dnwnstream property Owners stall 4 rc,",ad. F. Oraina a n_d Flond Cc_n_tr_al 1. The applicant will be r,sponvbte for c nitrurtmn of all cn -site drainage facilities re,u red by Ue City Enq-w,,. 2. mtersestion drains -111 be required at the followed locations: ]. The proposed pr,3,ct falls with, a, ,ndi"I'9 As a lret to flooding under in, nali —m flood 1 ^::n arcr p.1 a. v+ In., Iz zu6)ect to the provisions of LLat prop Ae and City O.Cin- :rr.':'. )y : a. A d.ainaye eMnne) ant /or fine, r•o :ce b en wall loll bw rrairld to protect the structures by ellverting sheet runnff to ztr.ets. or to a storm drain. 5. Mem,IIA prows: tans shall Fe made f,. acoptaotr ewf m.....1 of surface ,rains ge en :,,,,, the 11.1-1y fro* asja'wr' A,,,,. 6. letter of aaeptAlle fray do,.,,[rows Crc; e. t)' ^ mall to required Where runoff from the tract flows onto prf rs to Pecs ^roes. E' — — sl.alI I der -1 -1d As raJ ^r . , f J «.t.___ 4Tinq a m -tnrAt Inn of "', , At . t)pe dr ivena ppraen :es, rot led st, tic mnnec bons, f!c^, pro ten U an / .alts, and /or landscaped earth berm and rolled driveways at property line. ff. ibe (ol: pv, ng iIn. ,roan anal) be installed to th, sa bipctl pn Of the City En9,neer. 9. Pnnr to 1cordatlen of the ra , , a -stele nt g. study for the ple"t 'Mil be'u:_1 'ed to t1m pt_v nl c;K And d.eina < 9 Engineer for PLO it let /t 1. Provide all .hilt.. .swine. to .... lot i,cl�Lnc dry .rs, -fX� welrr, elect — Pm eq yA S, telfp�cee J_ 2. All ut,liturs w: von I po;'a s ,1' is m;twn.d `r in clod v.9 In ties 'tell ea• r a. 1,. by con V ,v- -/I-]. utility ea:rmts s ^lit tr P :nird to Dr '.uhra ti cn of the !!!Y if ry in9 'tint' tm.Canit's a"-' :.r Cpl) Crl r /\ a. Ph Clefer snail ee re'Ponslble for the eel oul..A of 1.gbn9 pO,,,C YYY u; it -Frei, az rrpu rr f. 5. .elcr.r span " "', - -oll a or c.. ,n: calla: ✓.n n sv..,.t t,;rt sal ,16 accordance with southern [atifcrnla [YSen Co.,,A/ and City siandmde. SIp[4i'I:A:E fill l[P PV:II. WALK APPIt.1LICd115 C- - -•fit OY[PLAY 14 As 10 01140. •includes landsaping and brigs Lion on meter. A a. Prior to any work being performed In the pull lc right-of-Ay. fees swill M paid and an en s ...th —ut penult stall M obUiued Inm 11, City EPgineer's Office, In addition to any other permits required. 5. Strept Int,ovement plans approved by the City [rlgineer and prepared by a Pel,stered Civil [^gin shall be require], for all strut inproronnrts, print to tssumce of an .b,P.chAbnb permit. [,Pat ell., And Profiles 'ball x1,. the location of all e.lsbog utility fatalities within the right -of -way. \J X6. SVrrty sbAll he pasted And an agreement e[rcuted to it., [.Ills!"L In Of th, City 1u ;—car and the Ctty Attorn.y, g maing c unlrt,on of the pidAic Ineprovrncnts, prior to recording rr of the map or the issuance of building permits, Whichever comes ll rs t. x1. All street impmvrnen LS shall be Installed to the satisfaction n( the �/j City Engineer, prior to oeoupancy. /V a. r"r"Ae strip,nf, !ng, baffle and sbeft n �— signing shall be Installed per th <,u r mu of um CIL, Engineer. 9. Gl:linl tl t, •sid rr9•drml re[nn:rL1IIAn 51.111 11—I 1— 'Or traffn. at wolf okra Wth adrgwtr detours dunng o: n•.b ncl m+ A Usn d "ll,t dull Im �ryvrd to cOver the lost ql g, a.i ink e.d eav l ng, wI,iih shall to refunded on completion of the most, ucldon to the satisfaction or the City Engineer. v i'r effect Lo. _ u:all.,yc still to 11.rlda'd Letveen Pu01a sidewalks aA0-site pe eltrian areal. IL Concentrated Jq snags flows stall Trot vase side.alks. Under sidewalk drelns :ball be Installed 1, coy :[..darn,. _ II. An 1—r9y cisnralnr an,far urn ... ..... Ol r.a; rrs A'11 Or ,s ill ed to it' satisfa[tapn of the City dge.... at the end Al Stub At tee is. A letter or accept once of dra male runoff from the dnwnstream property Owners stall 4 rc,",ad. F. Oraina a n_d Flond Cc_n_tr_al 1. The applicant will be r,sponvbte for c nitrurtmn of all cn -site drainage facilities re,u red by Ue City Enq-w,,. 2. mtersestion drains -111 be required at the followed locations: ]. The proposed pr,3,ct falls with, a, ,ndi"I'9 As a lret to flooding under in, nali —m flood 1 ^::n arcr p.1 a. v+ In., Iz zu6)ect to the provisions of LLat prop Ae and City O.Cin- :rr.':'. )y : a. A d.ainaye eMnne) ant /or fine, r•o :ce b en wall loll bw rrairld to protect the structures by ellverting sheet runnff to ztr.ets. or to a storm drain. 5. Mem,IIA prows: tans shall Fe made f,. acoptaotr ewf m.....1 of surface ,rains ge en :,,,,, the 11.1-1y fro* asja'wr' A,,,,. 6. letter of aaeptAlle fray do,.,,[rows Crc; e. t)' ^ mall to required Where runoff from the tract flows onto prf rs to Pecs ^roes. E' — — sl.alI I der -1 -1d As raJ ^r . , f J «.t.___ 4Tinq a m -tnrAt Inn of "', , At . t)pe dr ivena ppraen :es, rot led st, tic mnnec bons, f!c^, pro ten U an / .alts, and /or landscaped earth berm and rolled driveways at property line. ff. ibe (ol: pv, ng iIn. ,roan anal) be installed to th, sa bipctl pn Of the City En9,neer. 9. Pnnr to 1cordatlen of the ra , , a -stele nt g. study for the ple"t 'Mil be'u:_1 'ed to t1m pt_v nl c;K And d.eina < 9 Engineer for PLO it let /t 1. Provide all .hilt.. .swine. to .... lot i,cl�Lnc dry .rs, -fX� welrr, elect — Pm eq yA S, telfp�cee J_ 2. All ut,liturs w: von I po;'a s ,1' is m;twn.d `r in clod v.9 In ties 'tell ea• r a. 1,. by con V ,v- -/I-]. utility ea:rmts s ^lit tr P :nird to Dr '.uhra ti cn of the !!!Y if ry in9 'tint' tm.Canit's a"-' :.r Cpl) Crl r /\ a. Ph Clefer snail ee re'Ponslble for the eel oul..A of 1.gbn9 pO,,,C YYY u; it -Frei, az rrpu rr f. 5. .elcr.r span " "', - -oll a or c.. ,n: calla: ✓.n n sv..,.t t,;rt sal ,16 accordance with southern [atifcrnla [YSen Co.,,A/ and City siandmde. Ll 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 21, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment 82 -OIB Subm`tted for Council consideration is General Plan Amendment 82 -0IB. As explained in the attached Planning Commission memo this amendment modifies the General Plan Circulation Element for Highland Avenue (Route 30) between Haven and East Avenues from a 64 foot curb to curb secondary to a 44 foot collector standard. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council adopt the attached Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 82 -01B. Respectfully submitted, 64� LBH:bc Attachments n lJ RESOLUTION N0, S1-1e1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council has activated the optional General Plan Amendment cycle; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the following amendment to the circulation elerent of the General Plan. SECTION 1: General Plan Amendment No. 82 -01 -B. Under the implementation section dealing with Highland Avenue (pg. 62) shall be changed to read as follows: \\ s- Hin'la nd Avenue - The portion of Highland Avenue (Route 30) we alignment of Nineteenth Street and interstate beten the re 15 shall be designated as a "B" section collector standard and shall be fully constructed by the south fronting prop- • erty owners. It is the intent of this designation that the roadway be designed compatible with future expansion to a major arterial or to serve as the south frontage expansion to a major arterial or to serve as the south frontage road for the proposed Foothill Freeway. Consistency with a major arterial development will require strict access con- trol along Highland Avenue with limitation to only approved street connections. Prior to development at interchange locations, the frontage system should be precisely defined and right -of -way dedica- tions obtained for the future roadway requirements. Map III -3 shall be amended as shown in Exhibit "A" attached. SECTION 2: A Negative Declaration for this General Plan ar,,end,rent, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: \\ s- .'I N GFNERAL PLAN XIE MEIN 82 -07 D REVISION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE DESIGNATION i JgU a 133 -3 C7 sCULAT,CI-N COLLECTOR SECONCARY MAJOR ARTERIAL -- MAJOR DIVIDED 1: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��c:xaroh STAFF REPORT 0'TE: April 28, 1982+�J� i TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer SD3jECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 82 -01 B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A request to amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan dealing with Highland Avenue and the Foothill Freeway Corridor from Haven Avenue to Interstate 15. Interim improvements to Highland Avenue would be redesignated from a secondary arterial to collector standards. BACi;Gp(: ' D. At the February 22, 1982 Cc^iission meeting General Plan Amendment 82 -01 B was presented proposing amendment of the Circulation Element to re >ise the designa- tion o` Highland Avenue (State Route 3D). The item was continued to the April 28, 1582 meeting to allow review of the proposal and Negative Declaration by CALTRANS. CALTRA'S has completed their review and comments are attached in their letter of April 9, 1982. The proposed amendment will revise the designation of Highland Avenue from a • 64 foot curb to curb secondary highway to a 44 foot curb to curb collector standard. The proposed change provides that the full street would be constructed by the south fronting property. Final design to be able to accommodate expansion to a rayor divided highway or reversion to a south frontage road of a proposed freeway. CALTRAAS concurs with the proposed amendment with the qualification that access control be consistent with a major divided arterial designation. Attached for the Commission's information is the original staff report for this iteT and applicable documentation. PP.CP_OS i4 A �1EtICi�Ei17. It is proposed that the General Plan - irculatio^. Element page 52 dealing with Hignldn:t Avenue be amended as follows: Hiohl a:••', '.venue. The portion of Highland Avenue (Routo 30) between the realign - ri¢ni Slreet. and Interstate 15 shall be designated as a "B" Section collec t;;r standard and shall be fully constructed by the south fronting property ovingr ;. It is the intent of this designation that the roadway be designed coi;matibic with future expansion to a major arterial or to serve as the south frontage road for the proposed Foothill Freeway. Consistency with a major arterial development will require strict access control along Highland Avenue with lip,�itatimr to only approved street connections. continued... ITEM 5 Staff Report - Planning Commission Re: General Plan Amendment 82 -01 8 April 28, 1982 Page 2 Prior to development at interchange locations, the fro -rage system should be preciseiy defined and right -of -way dedication obtained for the future roadway requirements. Flap III -3 shall be amended as shown in Exhibit A attached. RECOXXENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission approve the attached Resolution recommending adoption by the City Council of General Plan Amendment 82 -01 A and issuance of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. Respectfully sub L76 /' /d 8. Hobbs City Engineer Attachments LSH:bC 7 COLLECTOR GENERAL PLAN AHEI;DNMT 22-01 B REVISIO^l OF HIGHLAI@ AVEWE OESIGt4TIM Al F=-x A ILL ULATON r-'Aj%j - -� _� I L. I' II t PROPOSED II COLLECTOR - LOCATION --------- COLLECTOR GENERAL PLAN AHEI;DNMT 22-01 B REVISIO^l OF HIGHLAI@ AVEWE OESIGt4TIM Al F=-x A ULATON r-'Aj%j - -� _� I L. I' II t PROPOSED II COLLECTOR - LOCATION --------- SECONDARY MAJOR ARTERIAL - --------- .......... MAJOR DIVIDED o ARTPRI"'l- STATE Of CA11FCZNIA- RD5INESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G BROWN I4., G,).... DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISI xICT B. Son 231 :::�� , sss SAN 9fRNARDI MO. Gl6 CRNIA 9IO2 April 9, 1982 Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs: CITY C. 08- SBd -30- 7,79/12.20 GPA 82 -01 -B Rancho Cucamonga We anpreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the Draft Negative Declaration for the proposed amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan. This amendment would change the designation of Highland Avenue (State Route 30) from Haven Avenue to interstate 15, from a 64 -foot curb to curb secondary arterial to a 44 -foot curb to curb collector standard. We suggest that access connections be limited to Highland Avenue on the basis that it may later be converted to a major arterial. In addition to the interchange locations, the frontage system should be precisely defined and right -ef -way dedications obtained for the future 19th Street connection east of Haven Avenue. If you have any questions, please contact Linda Laurin at (714) 383 -45�_G. Very truly yours, Ctk] T( A. G. POTS k- Chief, Transportation Planning `4 r� u • CITY OF RANCHO COCRIOSCA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Developnent Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Developnent Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ter. (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no sicnificant environmental impact and a Negative Leclaraticn will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: General Plan Amendment APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Enai.n eerine. Division - City of Rancho CucamOnr.a NA: ADDRCSS, TSLE ??CO:.'".. OF PERSON TO BE CO:—ACTED CONCI;%NI`iG Tii :S PROJECT. r t nrrl n n„nr.� r•: a.. rnni n�F.+ LOC:,TTC:I C" PI'C 70CT (S-R!-'ET ADr) --"r, APB ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) F"tf' 19 , LIST OTHER PERNITS NECESSARY MOM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AG : ::t=S AND THE AGENCY ISSUINC SUCH PER•tI ^:S: C,Il TCOns (District 8) San Bernardino I -� PROJECT DESCRIpTIO >l OF PROJECT: Amend en of Highland Avenue G rpm eral plan C ection ecor.car_v "B" Section Collector Road re ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE. OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF A^]Y: Not applicable DESCRIBE THE EM RONYQ -TAL SET77NG OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDI"'G INFOR:•:aTION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS ncv ANIBMLS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE GD ^rm OF SL'RROL\TDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF M.y ESISTI`:G STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECEGSA RY S: <�ETS); o natural settin snot residential development with one commercial use near Etiwanda. Eucalyptus (Blue Gum are Is the project, part of a larger project, One of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental inner ct? No. z- 2 WILL T11IS PROJECT: YES NO _Y 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? V_ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? M 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or di_spcsal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flam—lables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: 4. Proiect nu,00se is to down ride designation of Hi '—laid Avenue which is therebv the change to the General Plcn IM PJ RT ?.t]T: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CLRTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnishc above and in the attached exhibits present the data an' information reauired for this initial evaluation to the bent of my ability, and that the facts, statements, an information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and beliaf. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adecuate evallation can be made by the Dever..!! e„t Review Committee. fc,✓,r'/ n..✓ I �/� February 18, 1982 49'1 'N •Date Signature "'i "'� L� Title Citv Engineer CITY OF RANCHO CUCA2`IO:7GA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECSLIST DATE: February 18 1982 APPLICANT: City Engineer FILING DATE: February 18, 1982 LOG NUMBER: PROJSCT: atl dment to General Plan - Highland Avenue PROJECT LOCATION: Highland Avenue (Route 30) Haven Ave. to Route 15 I. E771-,O ^!E`:TAL IMPACTS (E %planation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached shee cs). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have • significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships ": X — b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or x burial of the soil? _ _ c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? — — x d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ _ _ x c. Any pntential increase in Wind or Water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? — --. x f. C:magos in cror,ion siltation, or dopositinn? x g. Exposure of people or property to geologic har..lydr, such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ ,__ x h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or utie of ,Iny Tworal resource? x 1, Ilvd rn l� +�•�. Will the proposal have significant result;: in: t a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streans, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? C. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? ]. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant re::ults inin: a, Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? e. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4, giora El_rn. Will the proposal have significant result:: in: a. Chance in the characteristic:: of species, including diversity, distribution, or number Of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? 1 c• YES MAY'uE NO X x — X 1L. _ X _ X — b — X_ — )L — — l_ 1 YES MAYBE NO 2L IL X- 2L 2L 2L X_ X_ 2L X_ X X � _ c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: - a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers - of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional Socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? h. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyer,, ts< pnycra or project users? 7. l.nc: C:.r and PlanninG Considerations. Will the pr.rw•aL :iave significant results in? a. A rn:bucan[:al alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO 2L IL X- 2L 2L 2L X_ X_ 2L X_ X X � _ YES MAYBE NO 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant results in: • a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? X c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? X e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? X f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water -borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? X g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? X 10, Roalth. Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? X d. An iacrease in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathono�lenic ;r tho r nnire of people to sunm orgaa sms? X e. Increase in existing noise levels? X f. Cxposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? X g The creation of objectionable odors? X ql h. An increase, in light or glare? X \-_4�—\ Pag > YES MAY'c NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? X b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? X C. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? X 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? X b. Natural or packaged gas? X C. Cc=nnications systems? X d. Water supply? X C' Wastewater facilities? X f. Flood control structures? X g. Solid waste facilities? X h. Fire protection? X i. Police protection? X j. Schools? X k. Parks or other recreational facilities? X 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? X m. Other governmental services? X 17. F.o _':,i an:! Srarco ^.o_mirrcr. Will the proposal hd:.• si�gr:i; iennC rnr.�t t.a in: a. Use of substantiaL or excessive fuel or energy'.' _ X h. Snb':Wntinl incre,qu in demand upon existing sources of energy? X C. An Inc re a;;u in the dcrmnd for development of new suurcon of ener: }?? __- X d. An increase or parpuhmtion of the consumption of non- runewablc forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? X YES MIAYSE NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 16. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? )L b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). >_ c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X II. DISCO ;SION OF EHCInONIMN'TAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to cha above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). 7b. The General Plan designation presently conforms with CalTrans designation. This road being Route 30 of California Highway System,the proposed reducad designation will need CalTrans approval prior to implementation. 40. d III. DCTE.7.a1iL1TION 0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect L_J in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envirnment, and an ENVIRO'T!ENT IMPACT_ RE£t}RT is required. Date February 181 1982 Signature City Engineer Title Paga 7 On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect L_J in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envirnment, and an ENVIRO'T!ENT IMPACT_ RE£t}RT is required. Date February 181 1982 Signature City Engineer Title Paga 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CcC. STAFF REPORT �. • Ti _ Oa py�YY�T FI DQ aL�: February 22, 1982 C'd 1977 TO: Planning Conmission F)a*-1: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SU3.ic.CS: G;,T."RAI, PIAN PMEI ME-NT 82 -01 B - Crry OF RANCHO CL'CAMa\'G A request to amrnc the Circulation Ele•rent of the General Plan dealing with Highland Avenue and the Foothill Freeway Corridor f_V3M Haven Avenue to Interstate 15. Interim improvements to Highland Avenue would be redesignated from a secondary arterial to collector standards. 'I'hxcugh the process of review of the initial phases of the Victoria Pln=..,�d Cc- .ity, staff working with CalTrans has developed an approach to the interim i�provement of Highland Avenue between Haven Avenue and the cevore Freeway which differs from the designation spelled out in the current Circulation Element of the General Plan. • Attichcd for Camnission review is a copy of the current plan text which dis:,:sses an interim designation for Highland Avenue as a "C" Section prov:d_:;a for a 64 foot curb to curb section with an 88 foot right -of -way. 7n4 dos: ^:at3on was assigned to reflect continuity with the westerly mrt3ons of lbute 30 along 19th Street. In reve•.ui::g the first phase of Victoria, two facts became apparent: firs, because the freeway corridor is adjacent to Highland Avenue at this lccat c- the [ntential of development on the north half of the street would not eca:r as long asthefreeway option is viable; second, that if a freeway is censt_uctcd, Highland vould bec-me a frontage road to the freeway requir- irg a cclie =r stariards road 44 feet wide wit's a 66 foot right -cf -way. It has generally been reccmiaod that if the free•..ay is not constructed that sa-:3 major arterial or c;presmwm.y should be provided in the corridor. Given th=o facts, an approach has been developed which calls for the redesignation of Highland to the collector standard to be constreeted fully by the southerly frcnti: ', - ,.rte. Ti;o .,_..,.. .. o.iP to:'.osi• :oi is tr._ sout erly half of a Ttu:: acpreach ,10u111 seem to provido the Trost £lemihility for the comunity ar.d fits well with all. of the options currently contemplatrt3 within the corri- dor. stoic ilos taken the opportmity of the current Cmcral Plan am mcbTrnt period to G ye: consideration of the prcposai scenc^rnt. The revised Ceneral Plan • ITEM 0 (( 1:P\I, "PIAN aZIDM,t -Vr 82 -01 �... Pcbz,ar, 22, 1982 Page 2 C language is attached along with the Fhviroraiental Assessment/Negative Declara- tion. CalTrans being a responsible agency for this facility should be con- tacted with the proposal and environmental determination and given formal revie..0 rights. RECD.' •!EIDATIOLN: It is recomerded that the Camussion accept public testirory on General Plan Anvm3 nt 82 -01 B and continue the public hearing to April 28, 1982 to allow review of the Ameldaent and Environv mtal Determination by CalTrans. Respectfully subnitted, I.BH:jaa _ Attacl-ents \ JY E 0 GQQERP.L PITH lgmN '1Sti' •, 82 -01 B • The Circulation Element of the General Plan, page 62 dealing with Highland Avenue is amended as follows: Hichland Avenue 2te portion of Highland Avenue (Route 30) betwEen Haven Avenue and Interstate 15 (Devore Freeway) shall be designated as a "B" Sectien collector standard and shall be fully constructed by soutl. rly a."^.ittiu:g property owners to provide compatibility with future construction of a rajor divided arterial or expressway and also suitable to be=m the south frcntage road with the eventual development of a Foothill Freeway. Prior to development at interchange locations, the frontage system should I>-- pr�iscly defined and right-of -uey dedications obtained for the future roac..ay requirements. I= :gip 11 -3 should be am rded appropriately. J C C The following discussion addresses special • problem areas that are to be addressed l through further studies and intergovernmen- tal coordination. Alionment. The Circulation Plan identifies major streets where alignment configuration is variable. Precise location of these street alignments will be dependent upon potential development needs of surrounding lands. Alignment requirements will need to be studied at the time of future development. Routes requiring more precise alignment determination are: - Banyan Street - east of Haven Avenue - Milliken Avenue - north of Fourth Street - Rochester Avenue - south of Eighth Street - Cleveland Avenue - Arrow Route to Base Line Road - Victoria Avenue - west of Etiwanda Avenue - Day Creek Boulevard - Church Street - Haven to Miller Avenue Foothill Freewav Coaridor. The development of a high speed limited access route along the Foothill Freeway Corridor is an important component to the circulation system of the City. Recently California Transportation Commission (CTC) adopted a resolution encouraging the City to work with Caltrans in determining appropriate methods for fi- nancing and construction of the Foothill Freeway. CTC will evaluate the status of a financing plan in early 1953. The City policy stresses the need for the development of an access controlled high speed facility along this corridor. Should Caltrans with- ' draw from the development of a Foothill Freeway, the City will evaluate other, meth- ods for development of the high speed corridor. Any changes in the City's policy should be reflected in revisions to the Gen- eral Plan. HYnhland Avenue. The designation of High- land Avenue (Route 30) as a "C" section providing for four lanes of traffic is an intorim designation until the time of con- struction of the Foothill Freeway. 62 With construction of the freeway or other limited access expressway, Highland Avenuel/ will become the south frontage road to the, freeway and be reduced to a collector "B" section street. Special alignments of the frontage system will be required at inter- change locations. Prior to development in the interchange locations the frontage system in the area should be precisely defined and right -of -way dedications obtained for the future roadway requirements. Grade Separation Requirements. It has been identified that railroad grade separations will be required at Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue at the Santa Fe Railroad. Grade separations have implications for right-of -way requirements on adjacent pro- perties. They will, therefore, require fur- ther detailed studies to establish right -of- way requirement and local circulation ties. Studies along the Santa Fe at Milliken and Haven Avenue are currently being prepared and should be adopted as precise plans through a hearing process. • Special Intersections. Through the trans- portation modeling process, specific intersec- tions were identified which may require local - ized widening to accommodate projected traff- ic volumes and turning movements. These intersections will require detailed traffic analysis in the future but in some cases can be mitigated through category F street widths. Intersections of concern are indi- cated on the Circulation Plan. A Transporta lion System Management Pro- gram (TSMP) is necessary to alleviate some of the potential traffic problems. The TSNIP, if effectively implemented, would reduce in- dtntrial traffic load up to 17 percent and 21 percent during peak traffic hours. How- ever, even with this program, information from the traffic modeling indicated the potential for significant traffic problems. The TSfdP will involve the close monitoring of industrial development to insure that suit- able transportation control measures are enforced on all developments. These control �?, y 63 l RESOLUTION NO. Qa'1Z'�- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAfIONGA, RECOMMENDING ADMENDMENT TO THE ADOPTED CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCANONGA GENERAL PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the City Council has activated the optional General Plan Amendment cycle; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council aporove the following amendment to the circulation element of the General Plan. SECTION 1: General Plan Amendment No. 82 -01 -B. Under the implerentation section dealing with Highland Avenue (pb. 62) shall be changed to read as follows: Highland Avenue - The portion of Highland Avenue (Route 30) between the realignment of Nineteenth Street and Interstate • 15 shall be designated as a "B" section collector standard and shall be fully constructed by the south fronting prop- erty owners. It is the intent of this designation that the roadway be designed compatible with future expansion to a major arterial or to serve as the south frontage road for the oroposed Foothill Freeway. Consistency with a major arterial development will require strict access control along Highland Avenue with limitation to only approved street connections. Prior to development at interchange locations, the frontage system should be precisely defined and right -of -way dedica- tions obtained for the future road:+ay requirements. Map 111 -3 shall be amended as shorn in Exhibit "A" attached. SECTION 2: It is recommended that a Negative Declaration be adontrd fo thi ss teneral Plan amendment, based upon the conmletinn and fin,l i�r_:. of the 1ni tiel Study. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 1982. PLAdM IIG COMMISSION OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Br: Jeffrey King, ChairT,an 1 —�- �_p Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of April, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: \�1 \J OF GENERAL PLAN ANENDNENT 82-01 REVISION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE DESIGNATION I EDCESIGNATIOPT- O LIMITS OLLECTOR th I . .. ......... , �-j4 -- --- ------- --- I't M -3 c -icll li PLAM ProposEr COLLECTOR - --------- SECC"IDA , RY - --------- MAJOR ARTERIAL --. . .......... MAJOR DP/IDED A ;TES! r RESOLUTION NO. 82 -44 • ` A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT TO THE ADOPTED CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the City Council has activated the optional General Plan Amendment cycle; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Ame.n.dment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve the following amendment to the circulation element of the General Plan. SECTION 1: 'General Plan Amendment No. 82 -01 -B. Under the ir.plc7entation section dealing with Highland Avenue (pb. 62) shall be changed to read as follows: Highland Avenue - The portion of Highland Avenue (Route 30) between the realignment of Nineteenth Street and Interstate 15 shall be designated as a "B" section collector standard �l. and shall be fully constructed by the south fronting prop- erty owners, It is the intent of this designation that the roadway be designed compatible with future expansion to a major arterial or to serve as the south frontage road for the proposed Foothill Freeway. Consistency with a major arterial development will require strict access control along Highland Avenue with limitation to only approved street connections. Prior to development at interchange locations, the frontage system should be precisely defined and right -of -way dedica- tions obtained for the future roadway requirer^.ents. Map III -3 shall be amended as shoo-in in Exhibit "A" attached. SECTION 2: It is rccan::endcd that a Negative Declaration be odor` ^d for tf:i: General Plan amendirout, based upon the coerLrtion and ficll":% of tha Ini Li.a SLuIY. APP ?WV' D AND ADOPTED THIS 288TH DAY OF APRIL, 19F2. COMMISSION Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ie L,��, Jerf!'ey,Yi n�, Ch��rrr,`;1r f ,.. Il ii / 1 Res c1U Li on No Pane 2 �A `f`}A•, , I{, C XTTEST- W 7 — • Secretary of the Planning ommission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and recularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of April, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Sceranka, Tolstoy, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None • • 0 • 071v nV n A Alnvn 0i10 ATR nllr n STAFF REPORT n4r6 z r GATE: July 21, 1982 V T0: City Council and City Manager 1877 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annual Engineer's Report Attached is the Engineer's Report and Resolution for setting the rate of Assessment for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Based on current historic charge rates, this years maintenance costs have been reduced to 50.20 per square foot which has reduced the annual assessment from $63.04 per lot to $45.00 per lot. During the 1981 -62 year a $13,259.66 carryover was recorded. This money has been designated to restoration of the Base Line parkway in the vicinity of Ramona Avenue and Teak Way. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached Resolution setting the 1982 -83 Landscape Assessment at $45.00 per lot. Respectfully su LBH:bc Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1982 -83 ENGINEER'S REPORT • FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The report deals with the actual costs for Fiscal Year 1981 -82 and the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1982 -83 of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Areas to be included in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. The total area of said parkways being 199,936 square feet (area amended per actual field measurement). Work to be pro- vided for, with the assessments established by the District are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinanry and usual maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration of any parkway improvement. Improvement maintenance is con- sidered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. • SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Parkway improvements were constrcted by the developers for the individual subdivision Parkways. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each subdivision ans as approved by the City Planning Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscape areas. The plans and specifications for landscape improvement on the individual tracts are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the enumerated parkway areas include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair, and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS Due to general deterioration, vandalism or loss various parkways within the District will be renovated, repaired and replanted at an estimated cost of $13,759.66. Based on historical data adjusted for inflation, it is estimated that maintenance cost for assessment purposes will equal twenty -five cents ($.20) per square foot for the fiscal year 1982 -83. These costs are estimated only, actual • assessment will be based on actual cost data. 1982 -83 Engineer's Report Landscape Maint. Dist. No. 1 Page 2 1981 -82 Estimated Assessment Cost $.30 X 187,449 sq. ft. _ $56,234.70 $56,234.70 : 892 lots = $63.04 $56,234.70 less (695 X $34.92 or $24,269.40) = $31,965.30 695 lots X $28.12 ($63.04 - $34.92 surplus) + (188 +9) X $63.04 = $31,962.28 1981 -82 Actual Cost Summar Contract Maintenance $12,524.33 Utilities 1,512.62 Administration 2,702.52 TOTAL $18,202.62 • 1981 -82 Actual Assessment = $28.12 X 695 + 197 X $63.04 = $31,962.28 Actual Assessment ($31,962.28) less Actual Cost ($18,202.62) = $13,259.66 CARRY OVER FOR RESTORATION 1982 -83 Estimated Assessment Cost S.20 X 199,936 square feet (revised per field measurement) = $39,987.00 Restoration of Base Line Parkway from Ramona to Teak Way Estimated at $13,759.66 SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed Master Assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A ". Detailed diagrams of each tract are included. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. Lot dimensions are as shown on individual Tract Maps as shown in records of County Recorder. TOTAL ASSESSABLE LOTS 1981 -83 = 892 ANNEXATION SUMMARY Tract No. of Lots *Assessable P.M. 5922 4 0 Tract 10491 20 0 Tract 10569 42 0 Tract 9484 -1 47 0 Tract 9638 25 0 Tract 10045 -1 114 0 Tract 11350 16 0 Tract 9584 52 0 Tract 9584 -2 45 0 Tract 9441 72 0 O.R. 80 -34 1 0 Tract 11609 12 0 Tract 11696 6 0 Tract 10762 84 0 Tract 10277 -1 8 0 Total Lots 548 0 *NOTE; Only annexed Tract 60 occupied shall be included for assessment purposes TOTAL ASSESSABLE LOTS 1982 -83 = 892 • r1 lJ 1982 -83 Engineer's Report Landscape Maint. Dist, No. 1 Page 3 • SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT 0 • Improvement for the entire district are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. ASSESSMENT = $39,987.00 _ 892 = $44.83 ($45.00) RESOLUTION NO. i 1 -I °S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT M1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1932 -83 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING, AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LAND- SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT @1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamong did on the 7th day of July, 1982, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 82 -116 to order the therein described work in connection with Landscape Main- tenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 82 -116 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceedinq and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. • SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience re- quires the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Mainten- ance District `'1 for the fiscal year 1982 -83, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 82 -116, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Enqineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be if finally resolved that the assessments for fiscal year 1982 -83 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Pi 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: July 16, 1982 To: Members of the City Council From: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Subject: Direct Election of Mayor Mr. Robert Dutton, a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, has requested that the City Council consider changing the position of Mayor from one appointed by the City Council to a directly elected official. If the City Council wishes to place the measure on a future ballot it is necessary first of all to place the issue of whether the Mayor should be elected by the voters, and secondly whether the term shall be for two years or four years. A third issue which the Council should consider is whether the Mayor should receive a higher monthly salary to off -set expenses or whether that shall remain the same as the remainder of the City Council. It would be extremely difficult if not impossible to place the elected Mayor issue on the November, 1982 ballot. The deadline is very close. If that were to occur and if the measure were to receive approval of the voters, the 1984 election would be the first time the City would elect a Mayor rather than select the Mayor through the appointment process. If the measure were to be approved in 1982, there would be one minor problem which would occur. That is that since only two seats are scheduled for election in 1984, one would revert to the position of Mayor thus leaving a situation wherein three seats for City Council are decided in one election and one seat and the Mayor's position would be decided in the next election. This minor problem could be resolved by placing the measure on the ballot in 1984 for consideration of the voters. If approved by the voters the measure would be implemented in 1986, the year when three Council seats are scheduled for election. That would mean that at each election there would be two Council seats scheduled for voter consideration. Staff is available to assist the Council in implementing the issue if you feel that it is appropriate. LW: nm I ( in X • • 0 ROBERT D. DUTTON 10155 Magnolia Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (719) 987 -9966 June 22, 1982 Mayor Jon Mikels City Council P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mayor Mikels and Members of the City Council: I respectfully request the City Council consider placing on the November ballot, a measure making the office of Mayor an elective position by the voters, rather than appointive by the City Council. Last April, the voters, in defeating Measure "A ", indicated that they do want a direct voice in choosing all representatives. This change would also help eliminate potential hard feelings and conflicts among the City Council. Please place the foregoing recommendation on the July 7th agenda for consideration by the City Council. If any members of the City Council would like to discuss this proposal with me, I can be reached at 983 -9601 during the day, and 987 -9966 in the evenings. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter Sincerely yours.. Robert D. utton ROD: sm CC: Mayor pro Tem Chuck Buquet COunciimdn Dick Dahl Councilman Jim Frost Councilman Phil Schlosser City Manager Lauren Wasserman, 1117 0 • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 21, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Assistant Civil Engineer G y�N 2G�0 Qr 4 TCt 1977 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Bonds, Agreements, Final Map, Easements and Formation of Districts for Tracts 11934, 12044, 12045 and 12046 - William Lyon Company (Victoria Planned Community Phase 1) The subject maps, located north of Base Line, west of Etiwanda Avenue and south of Highland Avenue are submitted by The William Lyon Company. The Tentative Map was approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 1981 consisting of 756 lots of planned development. The improvement agreements and bonds have been submitted by The William Lyon Company to guarantee installation of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Labor and Material Tract 11934 Tract 12044 Tract 12045 Tract 12046 $ 338,000 $5,100,000 $1,784,000 $1,073,000 $ 169,000 $2,550,000 $ 892,000 $ 536,000 Letters of approval have been received from Chaffey Joint Union High School District, Etiwanda School District, and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. & R's have been approved by the City Attorney. Additionally, Southern California Edison Company has prepared an agreement with the William Lyon Company for placement of roads, storm drain channel and grading across Edison 's right of way. The agreements have been signed by The William Lyon Company and requires the signature of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as well as the acceptance of the easement to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for roads and storm drain purposes. The Southern Pacific Railroad is preparing an agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the required railroad crossings within the William Lyon's Project. The responsibility of installation will be assumed by The William Lyon Company. Also attached, herewith, are the City Engineer's report and the Resolutions for the formation of landscaping and lighting districts for the Victoria Project for your action. continued... iu0 Citv Council Staff Report Victoria Planned Community Phase I July 21, 1982 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the acceptance of Improvement and Maintenance Agreement and Security, and the signature of said maps, Edison Agreement and Edison Easement. It is further recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolutions to initiate the process of formation of the landscape and lighting districts. Respectfully submitted, � LBN:J :hc Attachments 110 • L gnN Dn ii tr li= 43VNWI- UG ILI) (GI ILI) CiL L i. Tn L 2 f -)z� % (.IQ OL avoll1w T,L w�) (.GG Is; 1, 11) I Q4Q �V ��I) 1 .1 , n YW Ga i' QV'I 0) - I 0 ukP q C. II R z r zo (In I 0 .J iJ �TMv nc TJ A NIOLM OT TO A Mnwrr_ e STAFF REPORT DATE: July 21, 1982 F! � TO: City Council and City Manager 1917 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Condemnation of Day Creek Boulevard Drainage Easement - Victoria Planned Community As a condition of approval for Tentative Tract 11934 (Phase 1 of Victoria Planned Community) flood protection measures were required to divert flows from potential Day Creek breakouts away from the tract. To accomplish this diversion it has been proposed to elevate portions of Highland Avenue to divert flows to a broad channel constructed in the proposed right of way for Day Creek Boulevard. All arrangements have been completed to accomplish this diversion with the exception of the acquisition of two parcels of land along the right of way (see attached map). The Lyon Company has for several months attempted to negotiate a land swap to obtain the needed rights of way. The owner has not responded to any of these offers and is extremely difficult to contact. I have talked to the owners son in an attempt to meet with them but they have refused to meet. It appears at this time that it may not be possible to obtain the necessary rights of way without a City condemnation action. The Lyon Company has requested that the City review this option and indicate its willingness to proceed with the action. The Lyon Company would assume all costs for the condemnation action and acquisition with suitable arrangements for reimburse- ment or systems development fee credits. If the Council approves of this action the appropriate agreements could be drawn up between the City and the Lyon Company to initiate the process. The first action would be to obtain an appraisal of the properties as a basis for negotiations. Further actions would then proceed as required. Without the proposed flood control measure as outlined or some other suitable alternative, Engineering cannot recommend recordation of the Tract Map. It is our opinion at this time that the proposed protection system will be the most cost effective safest approach to protection of the tract and we would support proceeding with the condemnation action. RECO ;, *MEeDATION: That Council direct staff to negotiate agreements for the initiation of con- demnation actions for drainage easements within the right of way for Day Creek Boulevard. R pectfully subini led, ^LXB /Hale /S y. 1� , tom. r'�l f•i �.:9:. ��`=; 1� �c °`tt `1111j i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiVO ,NCA title Trz xv Z ENGINEERING DIVISION � T F 1i VICINITY MAP lv 1911 11:1$i' • RESOLUTION NO. 9 D— 1 34/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO'S. 11934, 12044, 12045 AND 12046 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No's. 11934, 12044, 12045, and 12046, consisting of 756 lots, submitted by William Lyon Company, Subdivider, located north of Base Line, west of Etiwanda Avenue and south of Highland Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No: 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement and Maintenance Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement and Maintenance Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. • NO11, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: That said Improvement and Maintenance Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement and Maintenance Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSFO, APPRO ,'ED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1932. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • 15 0 0 I 9 9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 , 17141 980 -224d July 14, 1982 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,California Re: Formation of Landscape and Lighting Districts Gentlemen: The William Lyon Company hereby requests the formation of a Landscape District and a Lighting District for Tentative Tract #119341 Tracts 411934, 12044, 12045, and 12046, in conjunction with the recordation of said tracts. • Assessment diagrams and legal descriptions have been forwarded to you by our engineers under separate cover. • Yours truly, r THE WXLIAM LYON COMANY GARY MEC ING Regional b13page \ pnm REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT 9513 AR R'?C.' HIGHWAY, SUITE K, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 - 17141 930 -2244 June 14, 1982 71 ..�;;';;•. City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O.Eox 807 JU,J Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 _ CITY OF RANCHO CL'CM'1011C1 Attn: Lauren Wasserman,City Manager Re: Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Tae William Lyon Company Gentlemen: The Southern Pacific Railroad (Railroad) is currently preparing an agreement (Agreement) by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) for the construction of an underpass and related improvements as set forth in the Victoria Underpass Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamongiand the Southern Pacific Railroad (Railroad Im- provements). • The William Lyon Company hereby agrees to assume all rights and obligations of City under the Agreement and to hold harmless and • indemnify City in conjunction with the construction of the Railroad Improvements, This cormittment will be memoralized by an agreement (Lyon Agree- ment-), between City and Lyon at such time as Railroad provides City With the Agreement. Said Lyon Agreement shall provide for City ap- proval on a phased basis of all Railroad Improvements prior to pay- ment to any contractor. Yours t!'Cly, r THE WILT``•I,L`Q LYON 'C0A!PANY ! �� i GARY MGCHNNG \ Regional rl•:�i ;ag er pmm CC: Tom. Clark Jack Lam Bob Dougherty Lloyd Hu' s✓ Hugh Foreman Joe DiIorio Dick Randall REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT • CIi 11 -'I' i6fili U IOI Hi H SCHOOL DISTRICT 211 WEST Elf TH $THEFT. oN2i.x 10, CA11"111- "I" • J July 14, 1982 Letter of Certification of School District Capacitv within the Chaffey Joint union Hiah School District and the Alta Loma High School attendance boundaries for the following described pd'�ro'3ecto Location /Description: Victoria Wind Rows Tentative Tract #11934 (Tracts #11934, 12044, #12045, and #12046) Number of Dwellings: 710 Anticipated Completion Date: unknown The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 105 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease /Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire ®0 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall validate such commitment. Superintendent Asst. Superintendent by Dianne cc: Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 157 O 0 !X? 211 WEST Elf TH $THEFT. oN2i.x 10, CA11"111- "I" • J July 14, 1982 Letter of Certification of School District Capacitv within the Chaffey Joint union Hiah School District and the Alta Loma High School attendance boundaries for the following described pd'�ro'3ecto Location /Description: Victoria Wind Rows Tentative Tract #11934 (Tracts #11934, 12044, #12045, and #12046) Number of Dwellings: 710 Anticipated Completion Date: unknown The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 105 students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease /Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire ®0 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90-day period shall validate such commitment. Superintendent Asst. Superintendent by Dianne cc: Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 157 (*D P.O. Box 248, Eliwando, California 91739 (714) 8991706 May 10, 1982 SUBJECT: LETTER OF CERTIFICATION FOR SCHOOL CAPACITY Within Etiwanda School District and Summit Avenue and Etiwanda Intermediate School attendance boundaries for the following described project: Location /Description: Tracts 011934, 12044, 12045, 12046, Rancho Cucamonga Victoria Windrows No. of Dwellings: 756 Anticipated Completion Date: March 1983 Gentlemen: The Etiwanda School District hereby certifies that the capacity for 506 • students will be provided within 24 months of the completion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy F. Greene Lease/ Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocations Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 90 -day period shall validate such commitment. Sincerely, /711v� Carleton P. Ligh tEootai' Superintendent CPL:ndq cc: Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga Board of Trustees • R. G. (Jerry) Bredlou Gary R. Collins J. E. McAninch Robert L. Rudolph Carleton P. Lightfoot Cecilia Solodo Superintendent Ii2 ' F001ul1A, FIRL PROTEMON DISiAICT P. O. Box 35 • 6623 Amethyst Street Rancho Cucamonga. CA. 91701 (714) 987 -2535 JUL 311ye1 July 29, 1981 n Mr. Gary Frye, Regional Manager The William Lyon Company 9613 Arrow Highway, Suite K Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11934 Dear Mr. Frye: The construction of 710 dwelling units in the Etiwanda area, as proposed in your company's Tentative Tract Number 11934, would increase the demand for service by the Foothill Fire Protection District by approximately 80 calls per year. About 80 percent of the additional ' • calls for service would require the response of only one engine company. • Since our existing engine company located on Baseline Road near the Day Creek Channel is relatively inactive and could easily absorb the additional workload, we conclude that the development of Tentative Tract Number 11934 will not constitute a significant negative impact upon the ability of this District to provide the current level of fire protection services to the development in question, or to the community in general. Sincerely, c�'4A�, Robert A. Lee Piro Chief RAL:va ac: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department '� 9 CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ]RRI :.N Of.R N.901vL R. CV CI. NONGA. CA';'. 91100 P.O..11,.]. •R>S ]91 VICTOR A. CHERBAK. JR.. May 26, 1982 vie. -P ,RN,.1 FRANK LESINSKY s "t—, csvw Ne,RO,. LLOYD W. MICHAEL • M—W'. EARLE R. ANDERSON ROBERT NEUFELD BEVERLY E. BRADEN The William Lyon Company 9613 Arrow Highway, Suite K Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Water Availability Victoria Wind Rows Village Gentlemen: This letter is to confirm that water capacity is available, and that our District will serve the 850 units within the • Wind Rows Village Development, subject to pipeline extension policies, rules, regulations and rate ordinances of this District. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, CUCA }CONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 7 i �� �Lloyd W. Mrchael General Manager j • /%v Vice ANK P.K L • ,: .i :,,. _' FR LESIN SKV Srwrtn. u. Gmra N,..a3rr CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MICHAEL M"ctor SS AI SAN CCNN ANOINO fl0. • CUCAMONGA. CALIF. 31730 1. 0. SIN 333 ' &STS SfI CHARLES T. VATH EARLE R. ANDERSON VICTOR A. CHERBAK, JR.. P"01 -1 ROBERT NESBIT July 7, 1981 P JUL -81981 Gary Frye Regional Manager William Lyon Company 9613 Arrow Highway, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Sewer Availability - Victoria Wind Rows Village Dear Gary: This letter is to confirm that sewer capacity is available, and that our District will serve the 850 units within the Wind Rows Village Development. The next expansion of the R.P. No. 1 plant cannot proceed any faster due to a pilot study plant that is being built, The plant will be expanded another 3 mgd before another major expansion takes place. It is mutually felt that adequate capacity will be available in the future. I hope that this letter meets your request and that you will be sending us your development projections. Our Engineering Department should review your plans as soon as possible to determine what will be required to accommodate your development. Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNT" WATER DIST3.L T Llo2 W. Michael F% General Manager LWM:j I(� 1 CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 76.1 111 1Z11,... IQ n„ • CVCAM C, \.'. T. CA 41F 91)30 VICTOR A. CHERBAK, JR.. P.o ;e.,, June 2, 1982 P, O, CIN f39 • 9G).2 �n1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mrs. Barbara Krall Gentlemen VivJ4,.tlne FRANK LESINSKY sk..m.,. G,e..m M. -... _ LLOYD W. MICHAEL Dn. ` EARLE R. ANDERSON ROBERT NEUFELD BEVERLY E. BRADEN The William Lyon Company, Developer of Tract No. 11934, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, have deposited with this District a Material and Labor Bond, a Vaith£ul Performance Bond, and a Utilities Improvement Agreement. These bonds and agreements, previously filed with the County, are. now being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. In addition, this letter is to verify that the above referenced Developer has complied with all requirements for development that arc mandated by District policy. Yours truly, C UCAI40NGA COUNTY/WATBR DISTRICT Ames, H. Cline, Jr,/� Assistant Civil Engineer JHC:bf �', C, FRANK K LI ' LE _ SIN SKY Sevrlo rv. Grnerd Ah nn yr SICUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MICHAEL Di.. g n.n ,w n'g4�F m•.o •'o cou MO::o._nu' gnoo • q.o oin nin • 957,259$ EARfLE R. ANDERSON ROBERT NEUFELD VICTOR A. CHERBAK. JR., Re.drd BEVERLY E. BRADEN June 1, 1982 ,.,� rw ,p .+a . •:� s' 1 JUII G l City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department CITY CF E;:IC110 G::' \�!0;! ?•\ P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mrs. Barbara Krell Gentlemen: R. C. Land Company, Developer of Tract No. 12046, situated in Rancho Cucamonga, have deposited with this District a Material • and Labor Bond, a Faithful Performance Bond, and a Utilities Improvement Agreement. These bonds and agreements, previously filed with the County, are now being accepted by this District as an assurance that said improvements will be provided, as stated, within the boundaries of the Cucamonga County Water District. In addition, this letter is to verify that the above referenced Developer has complied with all requirements for development that are mandated by District policy. Yours truly, CUCAMONGA COUNP WATER DIS3RICT aw'-:11[l . Cline, 9f // Assistant Civil Engineer JIIC: bf • ,),."2 ANVILLIAM 1,%'0 rgCoW/,7,Y/ 9613 ARROW HIGHWAY. SUITE K, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 - I71d1 980 -22AA • July 6, 1982 Mr. Lloyd Hubbs,City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 Subject: Edison Company Agreements - Victoria Y.C. Dear Lloyd: Enclosed please find the agreements with the Edison Company regarding their right -of -way. These have been signed by the William Lyon Company, and require the signature of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We would appreciate your havirg the agreement signed, as well as the acceptance of the easement, which is also enclosed, and returning both of them to us as soon as possible. • Yours truly, TH WIL�LIIAq'M LYON COMPANY GARY SMECHLINUG Regional Manager pmm encs: 2 REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT I (0 �1 JU_ pg PSIICHO CU'CAdOB" • • • Original Formation L oyd . Hubbs City Engineer Date CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 I a 5' k(•, 0 • • TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 Authority For Report Page SECTION 2 General Description Page SECTION 3 Plans and Specifications Page SECTION 4 Estimated Costs Page SECTION 5 Assessment Diagram Page SECTION 6 Assessments Page SECTION 1 Order of Events Page RESOLUTION APPROVING ENGINEERS REPORT RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO FORM DISTRICT RESOLUTION FORMING DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I n(, Page Page Page Page CITY OF RANC40 CUCAMONGA • ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The report deals with the estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1983 -84 of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 for Tracts Nos. 11934, 12044, 12045 and 12046 within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The area to be considered is specifically defined in the body of the report and on the attached Assessment Diagram. Work to be provided for, with the assessments estab- lished by the District are: • The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any street light improvement. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per dwelling unit basis. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers for the subdivision improvements. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the subdivision and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual tracts is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the • illumination of the subject area. I %1 7 SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS • No costs will be incurred for street ligrA ng improvement con- struction. All improvements will be constructed by :- velopers. Based on historical data adjusted for inflation, it is estima: -d that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below f.• the fiscal year 83 -84. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments w.:l be based on actual cost data. 1983 -84 Estimated Assessment 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* Quantity Rate ** 5800 L 333 9.97 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor * *S.C.E. Schedul: '_S -1 All night service per lamp per month. Effe :.ive 1/5/82 plus 20:a ,^ Lamps Rate Mos. (333) ($9.97) (12) = $39840.12 2. Incidental Expenses: Engineering and Assessment District Reocrds 51,000 City Administration and Procedures 500 . 51,500 /year 3. Costs per dwelling unit within Tracts Nos. 1193'. 12044, 12045 and 12046 Total Annual Estimated Costs $3983:.2 f $1,500 /year ' $56.09 /yr/ R of Dwelling Units in Tract i37 dwelling units /unit 56.09 e 12 = 4.67 /month /dwelling unit Assessment shall apply to each dwelling unit as er. erated in Section 6 and the attached assessment Diagram. SECTION S. ASSESSNENT DIA.RA.M A copy of the proposed Assessment Oiagr:.i is attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance Dis:,ict No, 3 ". This diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. • 2 ,^ SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each dwelling unit. It is proposed that all future development within the P.C. Boundary of the Victoria Community shall be annexed to District No. 3. The District does not include any lights on Arterial Highways such as Baseline or Highland, and it is not intended in the future annexations to include arterials. It does include Victoria Park Lane. SECTION 7. ORDER OF EVENTS 1. City Council approves institution of District proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to form a District and sets a public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon proceedings. S. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with City Council.. • 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 3 • ID° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 11934 1OF SHT I LLOYD HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER RCE.23889 DATE 4 %o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AcSESSMENT DIAGRAM WING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA I� TRACT NO. 12044 loF SHT 2 LLOYD HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER RCE. 2:889 64—T 4 17r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 10 TRACT NO. 12045 lCF `HT 3 LLOYD HUBBS, CITY ENG "JEER RCE. L38S9 DATE 4 rya CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00. 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA I�1 SHT 4 TRACT NO. 12046 LLOYD HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER RCE, 23889 DOTE 1OF 4 • RESOLUTION NO. 'F 0 -1 3 S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIVING ITS PRE- LIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets and Highways Code authorizes this City Council to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assess- ment district to improve and maintain street lighting located therein; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. , this City Council initiated proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3" to improve and maintain street lighting to be located in the boundaries of said Street Lighting Maintenance District and ordered the preparation and filing of a report in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, there has been presented to this City Council that certain "City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District Victoria Community "; and • WHEREAS, this City Council has duly considered said Engineer's Report in each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Engineer's Report is adequate and sufficient and that said Report does not require modification in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby gives its preliminary approval to the Engineer's Report referred to in the recitals herein - above. SECTION 2: Said Engineer's Report which is referred to in the recitals hereinabove shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceddings in connection with the formation Street Lighting Maintenance District No, 3 ". PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1932. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • -7 • • RESOLUTION NO. 8J -13% A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIATING PRO- CEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT H3 PURSUANT TO THE LAND- SCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets & Highways Code authorizes this City Council to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to improve and maintain street lighting located therein; and WHEREAS, this City Council desires to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3" to maintain street lights to be located within the boundaries of said Street Lighting District. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby proposes the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3" pursuant to the landscaoing and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 2: The nature, location and extent of the street lights to be maintained within Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The location and extent of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 is more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein, and this City Council hereby specifies the designation "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3" for said district. SECTION 4: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed too causethe preparation and filing of a report with respect to the formation of Street Lighting Maintenance District in accordance with Article 4 (Commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the California Streets and Highways Code. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 1 -7 �_ . RESOLUTION NO. EJ 37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, on July 21, 1982, this City Council adopted Resolution No. proposing the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3" for the purpose of maintaining certain street lighting improvements to be located within said assessment district; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 1982, this City Council preliminarily approved an Engineer's Report with respect to said "Street Lighting Maintenance District 3" and caused said Engineer's Report to be filed in the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, this City Council desires to form Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 for the maintenance of certain street lighting improvements to be located therein. • NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby declares its intention to order the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3" for the purpose of maintaining certain street lighting improvements therein and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. • SECTION 2: The street lighting improvements to be maintained within the boundarfes of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 are more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorpor- ated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The general location of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 33is more particularly described on the diagram attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4: Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a full detailod description of the boundaries of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within said assessment district. 176 Resolution No. S -D 3 7 Page 2 SECTION 5: This City Council hereby sets the date, time and • place of a public hearing on the formation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 to be as follows: DATE: August 18, 1982 TIME: 7:30 p.m. PLACE: City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line Road, City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 6: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be published at least once, ten (10) days before the date set for said public hearing in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation nti published in the City ono circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City Clerk is also authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be sent by first -class mail to those persons whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized county assessment roll or the State Board of Equalization Assessment roll with respect to the real property to be included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 2. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: 1 -7 1 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEER'S REPORT • FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 VICTORIA COMMUNITY SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Street and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION This report deals with the establishment of a Landscape Maintenance District for the Victoria Planned Community. The District will include the majority of the area as included within the planned community, as approved by Ordinance No. 143. Areas to be included in the work program are the Victoria linear park, the trees within the dedicated tree maintenance easement, the trees and ground cover within the tree and ground cover maintenance easements dedicated to the City, the public • parks, and other areas required by the P.C. plan or by the City Council, or as dedicated by the various subdivisions. These areas listed above will become part of the active work program, at such time as the specific areas are dedicated to the City. Annual Engineer's reports will be prepared and approved by the City Council defining the specific work programs for each year and the estimated cost for those years. As the development proceeds within the Victoria Planned Community, the area to be maintained by the District will increase and so will the cost; however, the number of units will also increase. It is hoped that the number of units would increase at approximately the same rate as the maintenance area would increase; thereby, keeping constant or decreasing the cost per unit, excluding cost of living increases. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, then the areas landscaped by the developer, then after a period of maintenance by the developer, the acceptance of maintenance by the Maintenance District. There will be a lag time from the original dedication until the District actually begins the cost of maintaining property. SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (SCOPE OF WORK) The plans and specifications and installation for all landscaping will be completed by the developers at their cost for the individual areas to be maintained within 179 each subdivision and be approved by the Community Development Department. • Maintenance Activities Detail maintenance activities on the areas to be maintained by the District include: The repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improve- . ment, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the land- scaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertiliz- ing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. • SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred by the District for original improvement construction. Based on data from other cities, and from the City of Rancho Cucamonga for land- scaping maintenance District No. 1 and from a review of the Victoria Community Plan, it is estimated that the maintenance cost for assessment purposes, based upon current dollars, estimated area to be maintained and estimated number of completed dwelling units will be as follows: A. Complete District The estimated cost (at current dollars) for the District upon completion of all areas within the planned community is shown below: Victoria Park Lane 1,176,000 sq. ft. X $0.30 /sq. ft. = $352,800 Trails and Parkways 1,224,000 sq. ft. X $0.30 /sq. ft. = $403,920 Arterials 1,393,900 sq. ft. X $.33 /sq. ft. = $460,000 Parks 40 acres X $5,000 per acre = $200,000 Trees 6,250 X $5 /Tree = $ 31,250 TOTAL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST $1,447,970 B. Sta tle Gne Construction The estimated cost (at current dollars) for Landscape Maintenance District for all of Tracts 11934, 12044, 12045, and 12046 comprising 737 units is shown below: Victoria Park Lane 450,000 sq. ft. X $0.33/sq. ft. = $135,000 Trails and Parkway 251,800 sq. ft. X $0.33 /sq. ft. = $ 83,094 • Parks 2 acres X $5,000 per acre = $ 10,000 Trees 1,686 X $5 /Tree = $ 8,430 TOTAL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST = $236,524 x-70 C. Land Use Summary • Ultimate Total Acres of uses other than residential = 294 Total Acres of Residential = 935 1,229 Other (Arterial Roads, Open Space, SCE, Schools, Parks, flood Control, etc.) 580 Total Acres =1,809 stage One Construction Total Acres of uses other than residential = -0- Total Acres of Residential = 159 Total Vacant Acres =1,280 1.439 Other (Arterial Road, SCE, Schools, Parks Flood control) = 370 • Total Acres =1,809 All of the costs and areas are based on current estimates and may or may not be valid for future years. The total cost and unit cost vary as the additional areas for maintenance are added to the district. The size of the areas being added to the district for maintenance have a great influence on the unit cost. The costs shown are estimates only, and the actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed boundary map and legal description of the Assessment District are attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A" and "Exhibit B ". Copies of recorded maps of Tract 11934, 12044, 12045, and 12046, showing areas to be maintained by the District, are hereby incorporated into the text of this report. Precise lot dimensions are included in the referenced tract maps and Assessor's records. SECTION 6. ASSESSMENTS • Maintenance costs for the entire district are found to be of specific benefit to �< d all property within the District in accordance with the fallowing relationship: Land Use Assessment Units Residential Dwelling Assessment Units Unit 1 Unit Vacant Land } Unit /Acre Commercial 2 Units /Acre Estimated Assessments Estimated Planned Community Complete: Total Annual Cost (Section 4) _ $1,416,720 Assessment Units Summary Land Use Units Assessment Units /Unit Assessment Units Dwelling Units 8,255 D.U. 1 8,255 Vacant Land 0 1 unit /Ac. 0 Commercial 294 Ac. 2 units /Ac. 588 TOTAL ASSESSMENT UNITS 8,843 Assessment Rate = $1,447,970 = $163.74 8,843 • • Effective Assessments Dwelling Units = $163.74 per year = $13.65 per month Other Developed Land Uses = $327.48 per acre per year = $27.29 per acre per mo. Stage One (737 units complete Section 4) = $236,524 Assessment Units Summary Land Use Units Assessment Units /Unit Assessment Units Dwelling Units 737 1 737 Vacant Land 1280 Ac. } Acre 320 Commercial 0 0 TOTAL ASSESSMENT UNITS 1057 IQI • • Assessment Rate = $236,524 _ $223.77 1057 Dwelling Unit Assessment = $223.77 per year = $18.65 per month Vacant Land Assessment = $55.94 per acre per year = $4.66 per acre per month • • Estimated assessments are for comparison only. Actual assessment will be set by public hearing each year in June and will be based on actual maintenance expenses and developed land use summaries. � fiS _ _ _ y - • _ `�_ I" J�_'i `r=at' `'I I i i b: t it r. rz J.... �. 1� ?? = III �: �-� _ ^` tii L•; `: _ �� _• ; 5LALEI 1'• 2000' �- y_,\ J�=:• a1 I�'T� m I � VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT EXHIBIT 'A 193 jr I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTNO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA /7" Vrq KY .c 0 / D ° � p � 1 / l — mar -..r -¢ p . � 3 �e O p I - �nrnrn 21 nrnumiuu.nlubmmm�mmm�nnm>r} 221 7 -Z /-8z SNT 1 VACANT LAND JYD BBSr CITY ENGINEER RCE. 23889 DATE OF 1 1 H G.0 t 0 1 1 O O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA •O 8 O 7 -Z)-gr I VACANT LAND DATE O O SHT 2 OF 11 fJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 7-Z(- fZ SHT 9 _ VACANT LAND {889 DATE CF II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NQ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0 VACANT LAND SHT ¢ DATE ( -7 1 O 11 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA :1, TRAI I B f I i l l l l ` I I l I I i 1 1 R T I 11934r uunnnOtpnnfn � -P _ I tr n o .. ZO I O I . I I n I ]O l+ l[ - a Is y WLLLRntlLLf .� r . — . � 37 © � r •e O . 7 -z / -gz I 8d I SHT. 5 VACANT LAND 3 GATE OF 11 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ly LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. . IIN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA a t I wuuuuuuiuu�i u.uu.�uw5w••�- _�- _`.....c.uw I TR CT o 120 to �1 i C I C I I e 0 I ° r ° G •.•• � d I I I O TRACT 12045 d �� i i n I ........ i...,. '.... ... �..I , d n ,y - tiI I ,•' I o n i • . �; . •.'y • . '. , ': I TRACT 12044 m r I r SHT D 7— zr VACANT LAND LL D NU CIT ENGINEER RCE. 23889 DATE y ie° OF 11 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM04GA COUNTY OF SAN RERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA -2,1-177- VACANT I I SHT 1 LAND 04TE OF 11 / G.:1 Ia l o l °; �? - Gyl E 't CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA • � .�a••am•n 'g 'e e e o O avaaaau ] Gor, Co/ 6 --- - - - - \ - - - - - - i C ]N� ol'— i- -•-- L.n Ia C O p I] N FFFF q O / a9� J i I / J I 1 I J J • rl O 7 —Z/ PZ SHT 8 VACANT LAND YD H u , CI Y E INEER RCE.23689 DATE I a/ OF it • I • ]] 30.3 x 2 �I l 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA sHT 9 �YCL VACANT LAND OYD HUt3H , CITY ENGINEER RCE. 23889 DATE J� OF 11 r 1 • „liovl Lw • t W 3 P1 .eM d ® 8 Gwl lM s I K Gorr. LW s .. _ J• •� MM I.I •I i G L L.1 B Garl LW Inn.f I Inn al h •' ...�• a jl • 1�3 1 u �� • I n yy) �� • I n I • n � • n • I n j I l 1 r P4 { • � a S� • n �. . e • I n i . I� a) u.•'I f •..r.r f • • I H j I sHT 9 �YCL VACANT LAND OYD HUt3H , CITY ENGINEER RCE. 23889 DATE J� OF 11 r 1 6 7 O 99 y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA rwe °I mN.ir Il N -Z/ a 2 DATE C r • 1 rr I A 1 • 1 e • I e • n • I n a'I N I. a � • + 1 f O I f O r f 7 r�.. - - + —�—a 'y -- • I u 1 • n r •. ) I N I a N l e 7 • �__ -' r aO 10_�� ..'' a LC.0 1 a r p ro f[w I�Wrruu. —. �. elro O 0 O O Ow SHT 10 VACANT LAND 1p2 I OF 11 O •1 ' + u Sj • u `s • • • I u • n • a n . n ♦ �+7n I a I N + • + • a I N f n ! • 'N I IIQ 9, � 10 11 + r[ . NrQ • e ® L,J I N ) N 0_ a .I • • JO • N I � + a ! w a •Q+ ' a • •p .� e! n 7,7 f f n -Z/ a 2 DATE C r • 1 rr I A 1 • 1 e • I e • n • I n a'I N I. a � • + 1 f O I f O r f 7 r�.. - - + —�—a 'y -- • I u 1 • n r •. ) I N I a N l e 7 • �__ -' r aO 10_�� ..'' a LC.0 1 a r p ro f[w I�Wrruu. —. �. elro O 0 O O Ow SHT 10 VACANT LAND 1p2 I OF 11 O •1 31 E 8 a e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA a M 1 n a a -Z1 -3z VACANT LAND sHr. 11 DATE OF 11 O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA • COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF (,ALIFORNIA 7 �z TRACT NO. 11934 SHT. EN7.NEER RCE. 23889 GATE OF ¢ IG� • uri GERANIUM PLACE Zi ` 3 4 516 7 9 55 56 57 50 51 m TF:Ec M/7 / /Vrc,` /,4 NcE ONLY j b IAARIGOLO CCU0.7 11 123 122 121 120 119 118 a 12 50 4" S2 49 > 3 z � 14 112 113 114 115 HE IF IS 16 LARI(SPUR PLACE 17 III 110 I07 2b 107 e IB 106 N us 20 99 JIM ICI 102 104 Y1 03 22 96 .ASMINE COURT 23 24 98 95 96 93 92 91 ID 89 25 26 81 82 m t)i BS 95 87 88 28 29 MS PLACE 79 78 77 31 76 32 75 33 %. 70 71 12 74 34 13 35 / 36 CROCUS couR7 38 7 �z TRACT NO. 11934 SHT. EN7.NEER RCE. 23889 GATE OF ¢ IG� • uri GERANIUM PLACE Zi 55 56 57 50 51 m TF:Ec M/7 / /Vrc,` /,4 NcE ONLY j i s1 45 T94 E MA/Nr6NAA' j 53 50 4" S2 49 44 7 �z TRACT NO. 11934 SHT. EN7.NEER RCE. 23889 GATE OF ¢ IG� • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ^` SESSMENT DIAGRAM APE MAINTENANCE. DISTRICT NO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7 -21—BL TRACT NO. 12044 sHT z E'IVIEER RCE. 2 ?999 DATE OF ¢ I Q!, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TREE MA /NTENANCE ONLY 6K0UN0 E TKEE MA /NTENANCE IV TRACT NO. 120451111T 3 RCE 23889 UATE I IOF 4 14? • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TREE MA /,VrENANCE ONLY \W� v GROLINO � TREE MA /NrENANCE �l�� -z�'8? I TRACT NO. 12046ISHT 4 Y ENGINEER RCE.23889 DATE + OF I qe REVISED 5 -19 -82 '1 -09-92 VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT EXHIBIT "B" THOSE PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 31 AND 32 IN TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 (JEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE TOWNSHIP PLAT 4 APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED NOVEMBER 13, 1855 TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP I NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE TOWNSHIP PLAT APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED JUNE 20, 1884 TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 5 AND 6 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 'WEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE TOWNSHIP PLAT APPROVED • BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED APRIL 19, 1884 AND THAT PORTION OF • SECTION 8, TO'd `!SHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MERI- DIAN ACCORDING TO THE TOWNSHIP PLAT APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL DATED NOVENaE.R 3, 1873, ALL IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3, DISTANT EASTERLY 60 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NCRPiERLYALONG A LINE THAT 15 PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT EASTERLY 60 FEET FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 1650 FEET OF SAID NORTHd EST QUARTER; THENCE 'WESTERLY 60 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY TO THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID 'WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE WESTERLY 370 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE NCRTHERLY • l of an VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE • DISTRICT EXHIBIT "B" ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT WESTERLY 370 FEET FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 8369, RECORDED IN BOOK 118, PAGES 36 TO 39 OF MAP BOOKS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE WESTERLY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 8369, THE EASTERLY LINE OF TRACT NO. 8805 RECORDED IN BOOK 126, PAGES 61 AND 62 OF MAP BOOKS RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND THE EASTERLY LINE AND ITS NORTHERLY PRO- LONGATION OF TRACT NO. 8806 RECORDED IN BOOK 130 PAGES 38 AND 39 OF MAP BOOKS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SEC- WON 31; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EASTERLY 430 FEET OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EASTERLY 430 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -'WAY; THENCE WESTERLY ALCNG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF -WAY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SDUIHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION BEING ALSO THE CENTERLINE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE AND SAID CENTERLINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE 'WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH- WEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31 AND THE CENTERLINE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG WESTERLY LINE AND SAID CENTERLINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT- OF -'dAY, THENCE 9 2 o 8 �9� VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT EXHI BIT "B" WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 260 ACRES OF SAID SECTION 36, THENCE 3 NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 36 AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST HALF TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE • SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID EAST HALF TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; • THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST HALF TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 31 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTHERLY 50 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG A LINE THAT 15 PARALLEL AND SOUTHERLY SO FEET FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 32 TO THE 'WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE NORTHERLY 50 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 32; THF, ^.CE EASTERLY ALOtiG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 32 TO THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF 6T(WANDA COLONY LANDS AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK. 2 OF MAPS PAGE 24, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 3 of ^a! u • VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE • DISTRICT EXHIBIT "B° I OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RE- CORDED IN BOOK 5397, PAGE 475 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK I; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK I; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK TO THE NORTH- EAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 150.00 FEET OF THE EAST 200.00 FEET OF LOT 'PIN SAID BLOCK I; THENCE 'WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH 150.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 200.00 FEET OF SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LIME OF THE NORTHERLY 100.00 FEET OF LOT 9 IN SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED EASTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 360,00 FEET OF LOT 9 IN SAID BLOCK I; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 360.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LI`IE OF THE EASTERLY 300.00 FEET OF SAID BLOCK I; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 200.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK I; I 1 U 4of8 VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT EXHIBIT "B" THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED EASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINES OF LOTS 9 AND 30 IN SAID BLOCK I TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; I THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 15 IN SAID BLOCK I, ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION, THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK J AND THE • WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK J OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS TO THE NORTH- EAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 40 FEET OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD • RIGHT -OF -'WAY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 200 FEET OF LOT 8 IN SAID BLOCK J; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGA- TION TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 50 FEET OF LOT 9 IN SAID BLOCK J; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 220 FEET OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED 'WESTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH- ERLY 250 FEET OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15 IN SAID BLOCK J; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 15 TO • THE NCRTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 87.83 FEET OF SAID 5 o 8 >J� VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE • DISTRICT EXHIBIT "B" LOT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 72 FEET OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID 'WESTERLY LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION TO THE NORTH- ERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK S OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 6 IN SAID BLOCK S; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINES OF LOTS 6, 11 AND 14 IN SAID BLOCK 5 TO THE NORTHERLY LINE ETIWANDA CACTUS ACRES RECORDED IN *-BOOK 19 OF MAPS, PAGES 63 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTH- ERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 31; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BLOCK 6 OF SAID ETIWANDA CACTUS ACRES; THENCE 'WESTERLY ALONG LAST MENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT F OF SAID ETIWANDA CACTUS ACRES; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF HIGHWAY 31; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 50 FEET OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG. SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY aECORDED IN BOOK 8279, PAGE 62 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTHERLY 6of8 del;' VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT EXHIBIT "B" • ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED TO THE NORTHER'WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF HIGHWAY 31; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THE NORTH 200 FEET OF THE WEST 230 FEET OF THE EAST 380 FEET OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK S OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS. ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 200 FEET OF THE WEST 218 FEET OF THE EAST 368 FEET OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK S OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, • ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 14 IN BLOCK J OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 330 FEET OF SAID LOT. ALSO EXCEPT LOTS 21,22,23,24,29,30,31,32 AND THE EAST HALF OF LOT 28 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2C OF MAPS PAGE 1 RECORDS OF SAID COU'ITY. ALSO EXCEPT LOTS 10,11,12,13,14 AND THAT PORTION OF LOT 9 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF SAID COUIIT'! LYING "WESTERLY OF THE -IEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH' .EST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 32. ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 19 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY LYING • 7 of VICTORIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT EXHIBIT "B" EASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 19 WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 270,00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE 'WEST LINE OF LOT 18 OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 19 WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 300.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 18. ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 13 IN BLOCK J AND THE UNNAMED ROAD 66.00 FEET WIDE ADJOINING SAID LOT ON THE SOUTH OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; *EGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTHERLY LINE OF BASELINE AVENUE 66 FEET WIDE AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1174 PAGE 148 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS WITH THE 'WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 13 IN BLOCK. J OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EAST- ERLY 150 FEET OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK S OF SAID ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID UN- NAMED ROAD. ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTHERLY 652.25 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 800.01 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5. ALSO EXCEPT PARCEL 1, OF PARCEL MAP NO.1, RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 1, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERHARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 4v SO EXCEPT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO ELLENA BROTHERS RECORDED JANUARY 8, 1945 IN BOOK 1728, PAGE. 306, OFFICIAL RECORDS. 8 o 8 a J � • RESOLUTION NO. -t3 E A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PRO- CEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTEN- ANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets & Highways Code authorizes this City Council to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to improve and maintain landscaping located therein; and WHEREAS, this City Council desires to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 2" to improve and maintain landscaping to be located within the boundaries of said landscape maintenance district. 01, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby proposes the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District • No. 2" pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 2: The nature, location and extent of the landscape improvements to be. installed and maintained within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The location and extent of Landscape District No. 2 is core particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incor- porated herein, and this City Council hereby specifies the designation "Landscape Maintenance District No. 2" for said landscape maintenance district. SECTION 4: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to cause the preparation and filing of a report with respect to the for ^ation of Landscape Maintenance District in accordance with Article 4 (Co :�vencinq with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the California Streets and Hi�.ihways Code. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1932. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 0 • RESOLUTION NO. 4 —1 3 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE LANDSCAPE MAIN- TENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets and Highways Code authorizes this City Council to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to improve and maintain landscaping located therein; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. , this City Council initiated proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 2" to improve and maintain landscapina to be located in the boundaries of said Lanscape Maintenance District and ordered the preparation and filing of a report in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, there has been presented to this City Council that certain "City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineer's Report for Landscape Main- tenance District Victoria Community "; and • WHEREAS, this City Council has duly considered said Engineer's Report in each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Engineer's Report is adequate and sufficient and that said Renort does not require modification in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby gives its preliminary approval to the Engineer's Report referred to in the recitals her•einabove. SECTION 2: Said Enginoer's Reo•rrt which is referred to in the recital, herrinacove shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings in connection with the formation "Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 ". PASSED, APP(;OVTD, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 19,2. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: lj �7� • RESOLUTION NO. o �o -) yG A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 2 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, on July 21, 1982, this City Council adopted Resolution No. proposing the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 2" for the purpose of installing and maintaining certain landscape improvements to be located within said assessment district; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 1982, this City Council preliminarily approved an Engineer's Report with respect to said "Landscape Maintenance District No. 2" and caused said Engineer's Report to be filed in the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, this City Council desires to form Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for the installation and maintenance of certain landscape improvements to be located therein. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga • does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby declares its intention to order the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 2" for the purpose of maintaining certain land- scape imoroven:ents therein and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. • SECTION 2: The landscape improvements to be maintained within the boundaries of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 are more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The general location of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 is more particularly described on the diagram attached as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by reference. SEC_TIO_! 4: Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a full detailed description of the boundaries of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within said assessment district. _SECTION 5: This City Council hereby sets the date, time and Place of a public hearing on the formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 to be as follows: Resolution No. Page 2 DATE: August 18, 1982 TIME: 7:30 p.m. PLACE: City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line Road, City of Rancho Cucamonga SECTION 6: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to he oublished at least once, ten (10) days before the date set for said public hearing in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City Clerk is also authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be sent by first -class mail to those persons whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized county assessment roll or the State Board of Equalization Assessment roll with respect to the real property to be included in Landscape Maintenance District No, 2. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren I. 4lasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mikels, Mayor J • L • • is ntmv n STAFF REPORT DATE: July 21, 1982 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Maintenance of Carnelian Channel 9 4� Ci f }. U E' 1977 As a part of the construction of Tracts 9324 and 9080 a trapezoidal channel was constructed from Carnelian Street extending northwesterly to approximately Vicara Drive. At the time of map recordation drainage easements were offered to San Bernardino County but were rejected. In accordance with Section 66477.2(a) of the Subdivision Flap Act rejected easements remain open and may be accepted at anytime by resolution of the Governmental jurisdiction. The original channel constructed terminated into Carnelian Street. With completion of Demens Channel and the City Carnelian Box Culvert the channel now enters a City maintained facility. This winter the staff locked gates leading to the channel to prohibit access. At the current time the channel outside City right of way is private property legally to be maintained by abutting property owners. This situation given the current drainage connection to Demens is highly undesirable from both a maintenance and liability viewpoint. For this reason the staff recommends acceptance of the drainage easements and assumption of the maintenance respon- sibility. In the past before the access was blocked to the Carnelian Channel, access roads to the channel were used for trail purposes. Requests have been received to again open the channel for this use. This request presents two policy issues: 1. No easements exist for other than drainage purposes and trail use could be challenged as illegal. 2. Access to the channel without fencing the channel walls would create an attractive nuisance with accompanying liability concerns. If the Council wishes to accept the drainage easement and open the channel access roads for trail use staff would recommend that at least one side of the channel be fenced and the appropriate trail easements be obtained from abutting owners. It is estimated tht fencing the channel on one side from Carnelian to Hillside would cost 57,500 and from Hillside to Vicara Drive 57,000. If the channel is accepted for maintenance some fencing at the northerly entrance will be required estimated at approximately $5,000. continued... a lr City Council Staff Report Maintenance of Carnelian Channel July 21, 1982 Page 2 RECOt^.PIENOATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached Resolution accepting drainage easements for Tracts 9324 and 9080 for maintenance. Guidance is requested concerning trail use of the channel access roads. Respectfully submitt v ` LBH:b Attachments P! � • • I-1 • 0 • LIMITS OF CARNELIAN CHANNEL i�r stn, title; ('ITN' OF Iz,�Ncl to c�:c,�alc��c,� A. . w r �r ENGINEERING DIVISION � T VICINITY NIAP page. • RESOLUTION NO. ? " — Iql A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DRAINAGE EASEMENTS PER TRACT NO'S. 9324 AND 9080 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The offer to dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, the property herein described for drainage purposes, is hereby accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Said property is described as follows: Parcel 1 The 60 foot wide San Bernardino County Drainage Easement lying at the rear of lots 1 through 10 and 14 through 27, as shown on Tract Map 9080 as recorded in Book 129, Pages 79 -81 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder, County of San Bernardino, State of California. Parcel 2 • The San Bernardino County Drainage Element as shown on Amending Map Tract No. 9324 as recorded in Book 139, pages 81 -83 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder, County of San Bernardino, State of California. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified cooy of this Resolution to be filed for record in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor Lauren 14Wasserman, City Clerk ;'/`/ u 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �Ci CA^ioy MEMORANDUM , C s / r June 29, 1982 Ci p F U Z 1977 TO: City Council FROM: Richard M. Da 1 Councilman ,LV' SUBJECT: Parks and ails Proposal Present Method: 1. Closed to the Public 2. One -man Department 3. Too much responsibility to activily pursue private sector volunteer funding and /or labor 4. Public relations must take back seat to busy schedule 5. Discourages public input because of busy schedule 6. Tendency to handicap communi- cations 7. One individual (with possible input by staff and /or council) setting; priorities Commission Method: 1. Open to the Public 2. Five new people involved in the decision - making process 3. Would encourage private sector funding and /or labor 4. Ability to improve public rela- tions through the Press and guest speakerships 5. Would encourage public input 6. Opens communications between city and community 7. Allows community input toward setting priorities Rationale: It is my belief that closed government is bad government. The more open government is, the more it encourages citizen participation and opens the necessary communication lines that is so necessary for government in the decision- making process. With the possible changes anticipated by Sacramento to the Quimby Act, it will become more apparent that if we wish to be responsive to the needs of our city, we must rely more and more on (encouraged) volunteer funding and /or labor. En- ass City Council ' June 29, 1982 Page 2 couraging social and service clubs, industrial and business leaders, and concerned citizens to become involved can only be accomplished through open government and open communication. RMD:ba r); '' • • is regular meeting o'.: tae City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday, July 21, 1982. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were: Councilmen Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs; Community Ser- vices Director, Bill Holley; and Finance Director, Harry Empey. Absent: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager, 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Mr. Wasserman requested that Consent Calendar item "1" be removed to Staff Report Item 5F. Council concurred. b. Mr. Buquet presented a policy statement of the Board of Supervisors concerning the Flood Control Benefit Assessment Program which was formulated at a meeting on July 20, 1982. The statement is as follows: It shall be the policy of the Flood Control District to cooperate fully with the - cities in Zone "W" concerning the benefit assessment for flood control. Specifically, the Flood Control District shall honor the priorities which are established by indi- vidual cities for the expenditure of monies raised in each city after thirteen percent (137.) of the funds are allocated to regional projects. The agreements between the cities and the Flood Control District shall indicate that regional facilities will be maintained by the Flood Control District and local facilities will be maintained by the individual city." The Board of Supervisors voted to put the assessment benefit program on the November ballot. c. Mr. Buquet also reported on a recent meeting of the Government Task Force on Civil Rights. d. Mayor Mikels announced that the city council had challenged the Alta Loma School District to a softball game. It had been agreed that if the city won, the school district would wash the street sweeper; if the school district won, the city council would wash a school bus. The City won 14 -1. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. Councilman Frost requested that item "f" be removed for discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -7 -21, in the amount of $345,957.42. b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Terry D, Thomas, Pizza Royal, 8671 Base Line Road for ou -sale beer and wine eating place. C. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Eon Hee and Song Hwa Ho, Tummy Buster, 8798 19th Street for on -sale beer and wine eating place. on _ _ _ side ac Wil j, to .I extending south to Banyan. The change of zone and environmental impact re- port are the result of a request to develop single family dwellings and 508 multiple family dwellings (Tentative Tract No. 11550). e. Authorization to execute Building Maintenance (janitorial service) Agreement for city offices (9320 "C" and 9340 "A ", "B ", "C ", "D", and "E" Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California) and the Lion's Park Community Center (9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Calfiornia) as approved in 1982 -83 budge C. f. Aeeeptan <e -of- Bends- and- Agreemene- fer- sin6 }e- fnmi }y- rlaidence- }eeeted -ae }3935- V }<teria- Arenee - -- Her£ } }e. Item removed for discussion. g. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for 5249 Carol Avenue. It is recommended that Council adopt the Resolution authorizing City Clerk and Mayor to sign said real property improvement contract and lien agreement for 5249 Carol Avenue submitted by Thomas and Aida Aramayo. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM THOMAS AND AIDA ARAMAYO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. h. Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion. *Site Approval (S.A. 79 -10) located at 9900 Arrow Route, Church of the Nazarene. Pass Book (road improvements) $6,500.00 RESOLUTION NO. 82 -122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR SITE APPROVAL 79 -10 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. i. Apprere- Hamane- 5eeieiy- Agreement- re- en-} nde f£n£!e- exlens }ert- ef- lhe- en£me }- centre} eentreet- a} eh- ehe- 0£ ey- ef- Renehe- Eaenmenge- en- n- menlh- le- meMh- bes£s. Item removed to Staff Report Item 5F. J. Authorize San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture Weed Abatement Division to act as City of Rancho Cucamonga agent in administering Chapter 5, Section 27.051- 27.057 (removal of abandoned orchards) of the San Bernardino County Code (these sections adopted by reference - Ordinance No. 137). This will be done on an individual case basis and at the request of the City. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Consent Calendar with items "f" and Y' removed. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Item "f" - Councilman Frost expressed concern that the Etiwanda Specific Plan Committee had not yet formed a policy regarding street landscaping. There would be a meeting of the Committee on August 4th and felt any decision by city council would be premature. Mr. Hobbs stated that there was no emergency, and continuing the item would not pre- sent a problem. Council concurred with Mr. Frost and set this item to come to council at the August 4, 1982 meeting. s _t. _ di. on by announcing that this is the time and place fixed for the public hearings on Assessment District No. 82 -1. For cnnveniunce he stated, that the public hearings will be combined into a single hearing although individual actions will be taken where appropriate. City Clerk Wasserman announced that a notice of hearing had been given in the manner and form as required by law, and that there were affidavits on file for the following: Certificate of posting streets; Certificate of mailing notice and filing boundary map; Affidavit of publication of notice of improvement; Affidavit of publication of notice inviting sealed bids; Affidavit of posting notice inviting sealed bids; Certificate of mailing notice of hearing on eminent domain proceedings. Mr. Brown announced the only matters before council should relate to questions re- garding boundaries, estimates of cost of improvements, questions relating to method and formula of assessment spread. Mr. Hamilton, project engineer, made a presentation of the amended Engineers Report and what had occurred at the last meeting. He reported that only three letters of protest had been received which represents three percent of the property owners. A letter had been received from Mr. Jack Sylvester which was not clear whether It was a protest or not. To include this owners with the protests would raise the percentage to eight percent of the property He went on further to report that we had a 21� percent reduction in construction bids. The overall reduction would result in a 20 percent reduction in the assess- ment. fir. Brown went on the explain the cost breakdown. Mr. Brown called on Larry Rolapp to make a formal report on sale of bonds. Mr. Rolapp stated that bond bids were opened for the Assessment District on July 18, 1982. It was recommended that the bond bid be awarded to Stone S Youngberg, municipal underwriters, for 12.6074 percent. He stated this was 6.5 percent below the estimate. City Clerk Wasserman announced that three written protests had been received, and also communications from Mr. Sylvester. Copies of these had been delivered to each Councilmember. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing to those who had filed written protests. Speaking was: Morton Deboer stated that they had not filed a written protest for this hearing, but had filed one at a former hearing. However, he wanted to pro- test. He owned parcel 236, approximately 10 acres. There being no further comments from those submitting written protests, Mayor Mikels asked if anyone wished to speak against the improvement, the Assessment District, or the method of spread. Speaking was: Vito de Vito Francisco, representing Jack Sylvester. They questioned how the two upper parcels could be included in the assessment since they would not receive any benefit; therefore, they felt these two parcels should not be included. On the Milliken side between 7th and 8th Streets, there will be a realignment for the railroad pass. There is no Cleveland Street because it stops at 8th Street. Mr. Hubb.s stated that the upper two parcels will not be assessed at this point. Mr. Brown stated that a notification or amendment at this time would be difficult since the Engineers Report and scope of the project had been completed, and these <e,.s asi<ec if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of the Assessment District. There was no response. Mayor Mikels asked if there were any rebuttals. There was no response. Mr. Hamilton presented the percentage of protests at this point which were liS percent of the property owners protesting. Mr, Brown stated that the Council could proceed with the formation of the Assess- ment District. Mr. Brown stated that it was possible for a further reduction in costs of the assessments of 18 percent for those who paid early. Council discussed comments made by Mr. Detect. Councilman Schlosser announced that he would excuse himself from the voting since he had potential conflict of interest. Mr. Berndell, partner with Mr. Deboer, felt it was unfair to force property owners to pay a large assessment. They stand to loose a portion of the property because of the additional cost. Mayor Mikels asked if there was anyone else wishing to sneak. There was no response. Motion: M -ved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0 -1. Mr. Brown introduced and read the title of Resolution No. 82 -123 which orders the changes required from the first presentation of the Engineer's Report. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No, 82 -123 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Mr. Brown introduced and read the title of Resolution No. 82 -124 which overrules and denies any protests. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING AND DENYING PROTESTS AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. Motion: Moved Sv Dahl, seconded by Buquer to approve Resolution No.82 -124 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Mr. Brown introduced and read the title of Resolution No. 82 -125 which is a statutory requirement, and a 4/5's vote is required. TENANCES SUBSTANTIALLY AS SET FORTH IN THE REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTI- GATION, LIMIATATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931 "p THAT THE PROJECT IS FEASIBLE: AND THAT THE LANDS WILL BE ABLE TO CARRY THE BURDEN OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT. Motion: Moved Frost, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No. 82 -125 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels. NOES: None. 09SENT: Schlosser. Mr. Brown introduced and read the title of Resolution No. 82 -126, a formal action approving the contribution. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND PRO- VIDING FOR CONTRIBUTION TO PAY CERTAIN COSTS AND EXPENSES IN AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to approve Resolution No. 82 -126 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Mr. Brown introduced and read the title of Resolution No. 82 -127, ordering the work and confirming the assessments. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE ASSESS- MENT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE, TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES, AND APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT. Notion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to approve Resolution No. 82 -127 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Mr. Brown introduced and read the title of Resolution No. 82 -128, eminent domain proceedings. A 4 /5's vote is required. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO EXERCISE THE RIGHT OF EMINENT DOMAIN TO ACQUIRE EASEMENTS ACROSS PROPERTY FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 IMPROVEMENTS. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to approve Resolution No. 82 -128 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels. NOES: 'None. ABSENT: Schlosser. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING THE CON- TRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 82 -129 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Mr. Brown introduced and read the title of Resolution No. 82 -130, accepting the proposal for the sale of bonds to finance the improvements. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND MAKING AWARD FOR SALE OF BONDS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REDEMPTION FUND FOR THE PAYMENT OF SAID BONDS. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to approve Resolution No. 82 -130 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Mayor Mikels called a recess at 8:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:15 p.m. with all members of the council and staff present. 4B. REVISION TO DRAINAGE FEE ORDINANCE FOR AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 180 to remove drainage fees within the area of Assessment District 82 -1, amending Ordinance No. 112, and recinding Ordinance No. 111 which established a special drainage impact zone within the Assessment District area. Citv Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 180. ORDINANCE NO. 180 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING RECISSIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN ORDINANCES RELATING TO DRAINAGE REGULATIONS IN THE CITY. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 180. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to approve Ordinance No. 180. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels, NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. Councilman Schlosser returned to his council seat. 4D. , CH, .. NO. 82 -01 - AL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 82 -04 - LEWIS. Rick Comez presented the staff report. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 181. ORDINANCE NO. 181 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1077 - 421 -06 FROM A -1 (LIMITED AGRI- CULTURE) TO A -P (ADMINISTRATIVE PROr'LSSIONAL) FOR 2.045 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 181. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. John Melcher, representing Lewis Homes and Director of Architecture. Stated he would answer any questions of council. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilman Frost asked if this was the best that could be done. He was not pleased with the plan, and felt we could do better. Discussion followed by Council regarding the design. Mr. Dahl stated that he had been present at the Design Review. Four plans had been submitted, and it was felt that this particular plan was in keeping with the overall Terra Vista Plan. Mayor Mikels set second reading of Ordinance No. 181 for August 4, 1982. 4E. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 82 -OIB: Proposed Amendment to General Plan Circulation Element to redesignate Highland Avenue from 19th Street to East Avenue from secondary to collector standard. Staff report by Lloyd Hobbs. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 82 -132. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED CIRCULATION PLAN FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE, Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the Public hearing was closed. 'lotion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 82 -132. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 4G. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT. Recommendation was that the item be continued to August 4, 1982 meeting. Item included the approval of Resolution No. 82 -133. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to continued to August 4, 1982 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. 5A. CONSIDERATION OF ELECTED MAYOR. If approved the item would be placed on the November ballot. Staff report presented by Lauren Wasserman. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. *David Flocker, 6674 East Avenue, Etiwanda. He expressed he was in favor of the change; it would make the process more democratic to have the mayor elected by the voters. *Bob Dutton. He had submitted the letter to Council for consideration of making the position of mayor elected. He stated there were a number of people who had expressed that this position should be elected. *Art Bridge. Spoke in favor of making the change to an elected mayor. The meeting was closed to further public input. After a lengthy discussion by Council, Mr. Frost recommended that the item be turned over to the Advisory Commission for discussion and further public input. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to refer the item to the Citizens Advisory Commission for public input and discussion, and to report back to the City Council. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels called a recess at 10:12 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:25 p.m. with all members of Council and staff present. %VIlIUNIA rLANNEU COMMUNITY PHASE I). Lloyd Hubbs presented the staff report. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 82 -134. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE- MENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT AND SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NOS. 11934, 12044, 12045, AND 12046. stated that if council were willing to approve the condemnation procedure, then the tract maps should nor be approved at this time. Mr. Dougherty stated that he felt we should approve a Resolution of Necessity for eminent domain proceedings first which requires a 4/5 vote to approve.. He felt the approval of Resolution No. 82 -134 was premature. Mr. Mikels asked if all the other resolutions should be postponed also. Mr. Dougherty stated that he could not see any reason for them to go ahead of the tract map. Mr. Dilorio stated that he has been working on that property for three years. The only piece of property he has not been able to buy was the piece owned by the Herrero's. He stated they were quite old, and he felt scared. He stated that he has tried buying the land, and was told no. He tried to offer a land trade, and again was turned down. Mr. Dougherty stated that a land trade has been offered. If we are to become involved in eminent domain, we could not get involved in a land trade since we would have to deal in cash. A reasonable cash offer has to be made. If that is denied, then condemnation if necessary. After much discussion, the following motion was made: Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Necessity for condemnation and to notify the Herreros of such, and to approve the Resolution setting the public hearing at the adjourned meeting scheduled for July 22, 1982. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to continue Resolution Nos. 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140 to August 4, 1982 meeting for approval. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to continue the public hearing and approval of Resolution No. 82 -131 to August 4, 1982. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. tion Item continued to August 4, 1982 meeting. See Item 5B for details. Nos. 82 -138. 139, and ICom continued to August 4, 1982. See Item 5B for details. before incorporation. At the time of incorporation, the channel was offered as a drainage easement to the County, but was rejected on the tract map. It was an irrevocable offer which can be accepted at any time. Since the construction of the box culvert which empties into the Demens Channel, a situation exists of a private channel emptying into a city maintained one. Several property owners have requested that the city block the access to the drainage channel to eliminate any potential hazard. Gates were then locked through the winter at the public right -of -way where access has been limited to the tra..t map. Staff recommends acceptance of the drainage easements and to bring the channel into a city maintained facility. Another issue is that before the box culvert was constructed, the channel was used for trail purposes and has been requested that it again be opened up for such uses. Two issues involved with this is the safety hazard of allowing trail usage without some type of fencing to restrict access into the channel. The second issue is the actual legal requirements to make it a trail since it is now a drainage easement and has not been designated as a trail easement. In order to legalize the use for trail purposes, staff should go back to the property owners and request additional trail easement grants. Two actions are required by council: (1) to accept the drainage easement and facility maintenance, and (2) to guide staff on development of the trail aspect of the channel. To develop the easement for trail purposes, then there are two options available: (1) to open up the portion between Hillside and Carnelian and to fence the easterly edge of the channel at a cost of $7,000, or (2) to open it completely through its entire length which would cost an additional $7,500. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comment. There being none, the public portion of the meeting was closed. After a lengthy discussion regarding acquiring the drainage easements and the use of such for trails, the following motion was made: Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No. 82 -141 and to waive the entire reading. Further discussion followed regarding the city's liability and whether to form an assessment district. Art Bridge stated that the channel was put in by request of the County. Those who benefited from it are not those adjacent to it, but those down the street. He felt it would not be proper to assess those adjacent to this since it did benefit the entire city. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels, NOES: Frost. ABSENT: None. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 82 -141. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DRAINAGE EASEMENTS PER TRACTS NO'S 9324 AND 9080. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to direct staff to acquire trail ease- ments on the drainage easement for the northeast side between Hillside and Carnelian. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to have fencing installed along the northeast side from Hillside to Carnelian and to keep the gates on the south- west side locked. After further discussion, Council concurred to wait on the fencing until after the easements were acquired. Both Dahl and Frost withdrew the motion. 5F. APPROVE HUMANE SOCIETY AGREEMENT. Item was removed from Consent Calendar Item 3"i ". After some discussion, and because of the lateness of the hour, it was decided to continue disucssion of the item at the July 22, 1982 budget meeting. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to continue to July 22. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS. A. POSSIBLE FORMATION OF PARRS AND TRAILS COMMIISSION Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to continue to August 4, 1982 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. B. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Buquet to adjourn to July 22, 1982 at 6:30 p.m. in the Lion's Park Community Center for a budget meeting and to discuss items con- tinued from tonight's agenda. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting ad- journed at 12:15 a.m. Respectfully submitte�d, /! Beve helot E. Deputy City Clerk