Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/09/15 - Agenda Packet0 CITY OF R,> W,HO Cyr iM(XNCvk CITY CM UL AGLN'PA Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California September 15, 1982 - 7:30 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The -- lead - -.e for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meet:.. -,g. The City clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. `�'cc `,.r• A. Pledge of .Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Dahl, Buquet_`, Frost 'A, Schlosser�c , and Mikels X lzt C. Approval of Minutes: August 4, 1982 and August 9, 1982. 77 i 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Presentation of Proclamation to Vinyeard Little League. b. Thursday, September 23, 7:00 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -9 -15 in the amount of $642,042.23. b c Recommend approval of escrow instructions for the purchase of right -of -way for Assessment District 82 -1 with Assessment District funds. Rec end ap oval f ity -State gTeement fund- ing o th ineyard ue Reco r tion oject d recomme award of contr t the to dder, Red Hill ns cti Company or $241,564. 1 3 11 r1 L A City Council Agenda RESOLUTION NO. 82 -161 -2- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08 -5420, SUPPLEMENT NO. 5. d. Acceptance of Parcel Map 7244, Bonds, Agreement, Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement - Messenger Investment Company located on the south side of Foothill, east of Elm Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -162 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7244, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -163 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM MESSEN- GER INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. Xn e. Acceptan f Pa rce Bonds> ment, and Vacation a portisburgh Av ue R. C. Industr' 1 C any. RESO TION NO. 82 -164 A RE T ON OF THE CITY C I OF THE CITY OF CHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IA, APPROV G P EL MAP NUMBER 555, ROVE - MENT GREEMENT, ND IMPROV ENT SECURITY. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -165 A R ION F T COUNC OF THE CITY OF R CUCAMONGA, ORNIA, SUMMARILY DER ' THE VACA 0 .....� PORTION OF DER AVE E. September 15, 1982 12 20 21 22 32 i�2.2riviD, 36 37 0 u 9 City Council Agenda -3- September 15, 1982 f. Approval to Annex Tract 9658 into the Landscape 44 Maintenance District No. 1 - Annexation No. 10. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -166 46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO LAND- SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -167 �9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXA- TION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO. e. Refer Claim against the City by Connie Alvarez to the 51 City Attorney for handling. h. Refer Claim against the City by Thomas Bryant to the 54 City Attorney for handling. i. Release of Bond: Parcel Map 6582, located on the 56 southeast corner of Helms and Foothill - Praver Bras. Investments. Faithful Performance Bond $51,600 Labor 8 Material Bond $25,800 j. Approval to Change the Title of the Maintenance 57 Supervisor to that of Maintenance Superintendent. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 81 -04 - 59 _ WILSON. A change of zone from R -1- 0,000 single family residential - 20,000 sq. ft. lot minimum) to R -1- 10,000 (single family residen- tial - 10,000 sq, ft. lot minimum) for 6.9 acres of land located on Banyan Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201 - 251 -63 and 64. City Council Agenda -4- ORDINANCE NO. 183 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201- 251 -63 AND 64, LOCATED SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM R -1- 20,000 TO R -1- 10,000. September 15, 1982 no- B. .P . d €narrce- -1 Irf.,j {c establishing public notification procedures �. for Planning Commission public hearings. ORDINANCE NO. 184 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISH- ING PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLAN- NING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2 AND 3 OF THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 79 -1, REESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. REFUSE RATE INCREASE REQUEST. A request has been received y Yukon Disposal and Rancho Disposal for a rate increase to become effective on 10 -1 -82. Staff report by Harry Empey. S. CREAT -IW OF SENIOR DEPUTY POSITION. Recommendation: To approve the new classifi- cation of Senior Deputy, Total increase in contract for change would be $3,977.00. C. BUDGET REVISION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR ISCAL YEAR 1982 -83. As a result of completed estimate of tax increment from the San Bernardino County Auditor's Office, a budget revision is requested for 1982 -83. Council will review the results of the completed tax increment and re- vise the Agency budget accordingly. The Council will also adopt a Resolution to advance the Agency the amount necessary to establish de- partment to receive a tax increment. vn 82 LE 91 /.ra 94 is City Council Agenda -S- September 15, 19B2 RESOLUTION NO. 82 -169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADVANCING MONEY TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN ORDER TO INCUR DEBT TO THE AMOUNT OF THE TAR INCREMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83. D. CONSIDERATION OF A FINANCIAL SYSTEM COMPUTER PACKAGE. Staff report by Harry Empey. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS. 95 A. Council discussion of issues affecting Ordinance 98 No. 78 providing for the sale of safe and sane fireworks. This item is for city council dis- cussion only in preparation for consideration as a public hearing item at a later date. • 8. ADJOURNMENT. CJ I 11 DI iI i2 �7 [EIr W CMD CUCINRN[A W4RR :Ivy A E MOO R W A R E �n3lcv Gt ALT FALY PII lS cl AL A:Cr R CH '] CllC 4 "(•Yf R N-IN7 ", f NRFnr rr[nr C .1[ " VI w C V! Nl Y R ICR NI VL 1,112 CTICN °S )571 '+ WAIFR CAST F IC 7f .A. 7 11' FS CS C1sT rJ : of •,r p Y R PYPI:T Cr. N At..P RA I'll VCY L". L C C S:JRrfRY 405A CO 5 INC E GRCCP RAC N' L� P IPi, L IT rRr RUC7104 [C vtn 1:(cP iCh —MC °N 112 S N L Prot ASSOC ;111 '..75 K C GRAVFL S CCRP CRS RFS ASSO WARRANT N[l,l1ppuI1[71.l141• 1115101 P74E• 1 MM ■■ DISCOUNT NF1 O1T[ REFF"INC[ 07112 51124.91 J2 /A2 L041.i< 93/a) 1,416.41 QQ 1 26.06 C3 %V� iYo2 245,C95:vC '1 57,51 — l5 /ML IS /o2 1• /AJ !O.0 C( IS %BJ 2n rf 4:4 is /N} 116.30 11/2 7,942'.46 15/82 3.315.'10 IS /tl2 237.47 11102 15).CC 4 5 4 4 2 3 IB.J1 13.)1 Ie1.V0 I•I,• r, N. 1 r SAI C11V OF 1ArCilC C11Cill7IIG4 4401 1 VE9 1 V F N 0 O R x A r ima, !)11n P- ou%SrM. 44+IS M I6IC♦ asi•. SA.e rfhr L S'•rrIFFS 1!114• CS .S SCIf:.C_F nYl. 611111 crrr p lbl 6 V91n V °NC" 1 411. 161,} Y"Ir VTNOGr N9. AUTO 16'01 4560 5fG %A CAY %TF% P6R IS 1b 69 561 SIGNAL r1— 461A[F LJ pO YI1111 VFIi'J.K �... 9AIO 1p191 Vxla Yl.,rr n.. 4A14 16192 e"n SO UIIF cpiS .n F'1 16191 6615 SO C .1LIF 'AS CC jyj95 I f0 STAII[N2>S • 4pE r91T CORO 16196 tits 5 -14 Pkrn F. rU 16191 )l 50'1 M FCr A+ U 193 R/59 IO_SA5 P',S ""S rl 1619' 6751 11 xoc1 152 0 6.19 11+CKV L �291 OF71 Li +f.i T NC p02 ..is Tplao A"V lC 1.?Ol 911.1 F01CiT AFM'r+4UN tff USWNI In 16205 •382 NrSTrFN rrCK CC 16246 5440 MIC.Ur. }n^9AS G 1620} S492 NIICLYF +Avirnv rr IA703 4.IS ILl I0. NS pe p.11•:G. C 14201 4}5 iF. rIVICAl S'FYICF 1.114 V'llll I MAIL TOTALS KIZ i5 I 11 ♦ANIIANT XFCr1:CILJLATl F1 9/15/62 CISCGUNT NFI NITRE rOVLVIT CL v /IS/ 2110 .Cr 9/15/'2' 9 /15/1'2 19X.0:4.01' 2.257.1] S /lS /p2 S/IS /e. S / 15 /B. 83}.02 � /IS /AZ 915.1 d 15 /!Z 9 /15 /R /15/5) ).096.44 v 4,51 ^ll'Siln� Wlilu 1.942.14 /IS /v,2 13.13 4115/62 5959.42 4115 /A2 42 1;115192 ./15/91 S /l5 /e_ ^O.CO S /15 /62 44.54 2 2 5 slid 1.9 S..�42 4115/61 S115/P) 11.42 515.10 9/15/X2 OO. CC c /15/52 40.15 4/11/6). 417.14 21./8,2 R.1} 5215/1) FIAAL ICTALS 642.042.23 IACF 2 a :0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA =4;tn STAFF REPORT Z DATE: September 15, 1982 - > TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer j BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Recommendation for Approval of Escrow Instructions for the Purchase of Right -of -Way for Assessment District 82 -1 with Assessment District Funds As a part of the continuing procedure of completing the improvements to the industrial area under Assessment District 82 -1, the attached escrow instructions are presented for Council approval. The ` of -way purchase involved here is for the completion of 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the escrow instructions for Assessment District 82 -1, as attached, be approved and forwarded. 7 LBH(:IAR: j as Attachment vu a yr nau,w av vvv�anva,aa� MEMORANDUM September 14, 1982 r u, a, 1977 T0: City Council FROM: Jim Frost Councilman SUBJECT: Fireworks - Item 7A The purpose of again raising the fireworks sale issue is twofold: A. The existing ordinance has been on the books long enough that some limited review of its content may be of use. Given potential State mandate, the question of sale may be moot. Continued use of Fireworks is probably also unworthy of debate; many organizations and individuals benefit. At best, discussion would be a no -win situation and will probably be post- poned until after our first safe - and -sane related catastrophe, if any. As noted, the ordinance itself relates only to "use and sale." B. Who and why? Ambiguity of direction and the proliferation of "eligible" organizations suggest that extensive review begin immediately. This item has been delayed for the past several years, although specific discussion has bubbled to the surface occasionally. There are at least four areas in need of direction: 1. Quantity of booths 2. Who is expected to be the final beneficiary of the sales 3. Who should be allowed to sell Within these categories, we also need to determine if existing practice is appropriate, or whether we should either tighten (restrict), or lc,sen our regulations. 4. How can we do more to increase the safety factor for the consumer through awareness or other programs. When the Citizens' Advisory Commission has heard the issue in the past, its direction was primarily to recommend a "yes" or "no" on the subject of sale and use. I would suggest as one of Council's options that the CAC be directed to hold public hearings again and make findings and recommendations in regard to the "who" and "why" aspect. Should Council again wish to delve into the fire- works issue, I would further suggest that any action be completed before the end of the calendar year. JF:ba RESOLUTION NO. * `c ;� !7c' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMENDING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN COMMITTEE FOR THEIR WORK ON THE PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. WHEREAS, the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee was assigned a task to prepare a draft Specific Plan for the Etiwanda area; and WHEREAS, the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee unselfishly devoted its time and energy through many public meetings and study sessions in preparation of the draft Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Committee solicited and received extensive public input in order to assist in arriving at policies of the draft Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Committee deligently completed their task of the preparation of the Draft Specific Plan in order to provide a comprehensive document for review by the Planning Commission. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council extends its sincere appreciation and gratitude for the interest and effort to all members of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Committee in completing the draft Etiwanda Specific Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk s aa� n ne.rn ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS ESC •. 3. __3-LN ab • Sao cer.a crs. G SELLERS [I BUYERS® BORROWERS ❑ DATE yetra:y ]8, 1982 TO Title Insurance and Trust CompanT: Address: 340 Fourth Street San Bernardino, California Onorhefore June 1, 1982 ,I /We will hand you the swm Which you will deliver when you obtain for my /our account a Grant Deed and an to Dedicate, copies of which are attached hereto IS Exhibitc respectively and by this reference made a part hereof. and when you can issue your current form of CLTA OWNER'S Lae insurance with liability in the amount of $ 199,]22.00 on the real prooenv descnbr _c .r. s RRancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as snc.n in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part i.ercnf. showing title vested in CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN.ONGA, a Municipal Corporatace • SUBJECT ONLYTO: (1) ALL tales for the fisol rear 1992 1983. 2Eovenann, conditions, rasninons. and easements of record: 3) Proposed Assessment Nos. 238 and 239 for Rancho Cucamonca Assessrers District 82 -1, if confirmed they will become a lien whey reccr_ed. • THERE ARE TO BE NO PRJRATIONS IN THIS ESCROW. ♦RR RRRRR}R• THE CLOSING OF THIS ESCROW IS CONTINGENT UPON THE FOLLOWING: 1. Acceptance of the Grant Deed and Offer to Dedicate by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. Successful confirmation of RANCHO CUChMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1 and award of the construction contract and the sale of bonds for the DISTRICT. In the event the District is not confirmed, you will receive written notification from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all charges incurred to date of said notification shall be paid by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Upon such notification and payment of charges, you are instructed to notify the Sellers that the contingency cannot be satisfied and this escrow shall be cancelled, Deposit by the City of Rancho Cucamonga of the funds required to close this escrow shall be deemed satisfaction of the above contingency. RR.R R RRRR RR The term "close of escrow" is deemed to be the date the documents called for in this escrow are recorded. RR eR RR RR RRa Confines on Paget _ P -Page i- ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS SELLERS ❑ BUYERS Fl BORROWERS Upon close of escrow, you are authorized to deduct from myiour a"ount the following: WE PAY ALL TITLE AND ESCROW CHARGES IN THIS ESCROW, _N',C — itg_r San. E.nsano_no, C D—'-' 711 411 • The GENERAL PROVISIONS prmred on the reverse s.as CI this Vale of these instructions are by reference Ineret meorOOralad Herein and made apart hereof an,, have oun r,,a and alien ... by approved by the undersigned. Time Is of the essence of these instructions. If this escrow I, not in cpntliUOn Ig close by the "time limit date" c June i, 1982 , and demand for cancellation is received by you from any principal to this escrow after said Carr ,no Snall act in Meprda,C, With Paragraph 7 of the General Provisions printed on the reverse tide hereof. If no demand k Cancellation is made, you will proceed to close this escrow when the principals have compiled with the escrow instruction Any amendments of or supplements to any Instructions affecting this escrow must be In writing. I will hand you any fun, and Instruments required to complete this escrow. All documents, balances and statements due the undersigned are to be mailed to the address shown below. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation 91gnatum.gy� Address Cipi Cle_xk. Telephone_�_ City Ct Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Signature HY Address paneho Cucamonga, CA Telephone ... 91�so Page — 2 __• Ir[COrrdM4 ,r [O V[ are. e CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' •n. "..a.n••..... r _1 n... City of Rancho Cucamonga p,O, Box 807 CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga. J L F ^L J • `I ro...... EXHIBIT " ArAOO ,ec” T,,a "re roa r[cc -oa. a _ac -- Individual Grant Deed in undemiaoed p.mar(.) de6m(•1: locoman." o.m(m u. i+ 1 11 mp ed tin full r.lue of prapeT an < d n ro p eed n rwn mmnn ., time el de on f "II nlue Ia r'•i "e of lim. -a a combo in6 � '1 ) Uri... pm.red .ra: ( I Gry at FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, n ;P, of •Frch i, he BETINA "C'eHOYT; JAMES RICHARD A. MEREDITH and JACQUELINE HE 1; GARY DONALD LAGS; GAIL GLASS U".. -'see RICKARD ROBERT AK. WAGNER, ROBERT Trustee LIECHT a hrmb7 CHANT(S) m City of Rancho Cucamonga, a MOM ipal Corporation the E.11 ',,B d• 614 red ProP<nr in dw Bum of C.lifnrni.: C "n9 el That portion of Lots 37 and 38 Of Rochester vainmthe recorded Aancoo. "3.a,an° 'z of y of San Bernardino. State of California, Maps in [he office of the County Retarder of said County described as A5foC5' East Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 37; thence. North 89' along the North 75 ne of said Lot 37 a distance of 31e e02 of radial line .hroo9B snide concave to the Southeast having a radius thence Southwesterly along said curve through a point has North 18' a5' 26' Nest; length of 532.25 feet to a point fn the Melt central angle of 52' 34' 45" an arc le rg int bean North line of said Lot 38 a radial line through said last mentioned W I" I" distance of X362 Ate feett to the pa inT" of beginning the Nest Line of Lots IB and h Oned —�— Rf chard R. Meredith /Jacqueline Meredit Satire C. Hoyt/ James E. Cross STATE OF CALrrORNlx S couvtn orJ Harrin ton /Robert J. Lieclld i M. „, .. ih<.ner. Robert 5. 9 N +.n PoFr".n . "e I. ..d s.,.. m,.mab •P..••M Gary Dona 10 La9elGail G1ais La9q Trus tee sM � Fnu uL,a,M rn ,Fe .nF n in be rM prun •'"e' ,coca rM u,u. ..a .nn,ddr<a mn fv liN (35 nr rona •na uFe'nl u.l SMn... Richard H. Magner , Trustee IAAII TA[ StAttMENTS As dafCitO ASOW EKH'2IT "9" RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF RANCN0 NLPMfIHGA • WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. BOIL 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR 0.ECG BDE;'S USE PROJECT: Asssessment District 79 -1 A.P.9: 229 - 261 -11, 12 IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowlec- RICHARD A. MEREDITH and JACQUELINE Ir RE01iH; RETINA C. NOYi; .:. _ ::-S; ROBERT S. HARRINGTON; ROBERT J. LIECHTl; GARY DONALD LAG -; Gal G'- ASS - -, -. .a and RICHARD H. WAGNER, trustee Oo hereby irrevocably offer to dedicate to the CITY OF RANCHO CUC Sr3va r. easement for R d nd mub'ic 'J tility P.rno e in. over, upon and across Lire real property, City of -ammo Cucamonga, in e County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as That portion of Lots 37 and 38, Rochester, in the City of Rancho :- :9mems. County of San Bernardino. State of California, as per map recorded in Scow i. page 20 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County cu: °:r: n follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 371 thence South 83' 45' 05' Rest along the North line of said Lot 37 a distance of 905.24 feet to a point on a curve concave Southeasterly having radius of 580.00 feet a radial line frm • said point bears North 18' 45' 26" West; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 52' 34' 45' an arc length of 532.25 feet to the '•est line of said Lot 38; thence Southerly along said West line South 0;' 09' 18" West 298.86 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 38; thence North - 43' 17" East along the South line of said Lot 38 a distance of 30.00 feet; thence 'rorth 00. 09' 18- East 114.51 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Scuth- easterly having a radius of 520.00 feet; thence Northeasterly along said cury e through a central angle of 89' 35' 47" an are length of 813.15 feet to a ti�;ent line; thence North 89' 45' 05" East along last mentioned tangent line 720.50 feet to the East line of said Lot 37; thence North 00. 11' 06" East along said East line 30.00 feet to the point of beginning. This irrevocable offer is made pursuant to Section 70$0 of the Government Code, Said offer shall be binding upon the grantor, his heirs, successors and assigns and shall continue in full force and effect until said dedication Is accepted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga or any public body having jurisdiction or until the right to accept has been abandoned by the City Council or by the public body having jurisdiction in the manner prescribed for the abandonment or vacation of streets and highways by Part 3 of Division 9 or by Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Streets and Highways Code, whichever is applicable. Richard A. Meredith Robert S. Harrington Richard H. Wagner, trustee Jacqueline Meredith Robert J. Liechti Retire C. Hoyt Gary Donald Lage James E. Cross Gail Glass Lage, trustee NOTE: Acknaledgement fares on reverse side • AA� s;- N I . I� (,G; Ac PC- r S N 238 441267 s,07 �w(,75= ,2I AFTER ULTIHATE WDENiNC. 9 7�j I ; A /°' -70G Ac .o -h r ��'-� e a 1L 10 FEE h G -- I 239 co Or) h Q EASEMENT ARF-A= I.DOAc. IT � F I t Lv C� Z T LLI O r -`�` - - -'7l -2.02' 1641 i14.T4 -- (,G; Ac PC- N000nvlri- &&ooi' 441267 s,07 �w(,75= ,2I AFTER ULTIHATE WDENiNC. 9 7�j I ; A /°' -70G Ac -o; 30j 753* S,F ��'-� EX 8181 r "A" WILL�AN ASSOGATES r.It I ":200' u.ell•2h 81 City 01 u,w w,LT �� IY H05PIT,WTV LM, SSE 110 LLA68:18'GOICIST MCMO CDCAMOMDA SnN BEfiq- Ab1i0, C492+t18 (nn- ers -xi,Ia o<um,.TAM...,.,.:. 1112 DIATMICT Te•t CAT NO FKOOKII ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS SELLERS ESCROW 7.0619 To: Tlab Insurance and Trust Company; 3a. cer-a -d Address: 340 Fourth Street Ca'E Ie_. _ , 19' San Betnardino, California t /we have read and aoWOVe the instrucnpm of City of Rancho Cue amoega, IS On or before June 1, 1982 Users will hand you the Grant =ee_ a- -a.x- Offer to Dedicate as Called for on Page "1" hereof, V which you will deliver when you can issue the policy of title insurance calied for thermn one wnen ea, %qn •r my lour account: the sum of 5199,722.00 frog which you are instructed t cr =.y saic- to RICHARD R. WAGNER in the amount of $11,983.00. The balance of the above funds are to be disbursed as follows: 57.51 to Richard A. Meredith and Jacqueline Meredith 5.01 t0 Gary Donald Lage 5.01 to Gail Glass Lage, as Trustee • 13.31 to Richard E. Wagner, as Trustee 4.8% to Patina C. Hoyt 4.81 to James E. Close 4.8% to Robert S. Harrington 4.81 to Robert J. Liechti 300.0% TOTAL .e.... «u.....•.wu.• WE PAY NO TITLE AND ESCROW CHARGES IN THIS ESCROW. The GENERAL PROVISIONS printed on the reverse side of this Copy of these instructions are by reference thereto incorporated herein and made a pan hereof and nave been read and are hereby approved by the undem9ned. Time N of the eased" of these instructions If this escrow o not In condition to Close by the °time limit data' of June 1, 1982 anddemand for cancel lap on is received by you from any on neipai to this escrow after sad data you shall act in accordance with Paragraph 7 of the General Pmvrsmns printed on the reverse side hereof. It no demand for cancellation R made, you will proceed 10 one, 0u escrow when the principals nave complied with the escrow instructions Any amendments of or supplements to any Instructions affecting this escrow must be in writing. I will hand you any funds and instruments required to complete thn escrow. All rudiments, balances and statements due the undersigned are to be marled to the address shown below. Signature SEE PAGE "4" FOR_ Admese___ Telephone • SIGNATURES Signature Address Telephone Page - 3 - 0 SELLER SIGNATURE AO-B = =S R CH RD A. MEREDITH P. 0. Sox 7:5T 4500 Car..Pus Nexpo:t Beach, JACQUELINE MEREDITH BETTNA C. HOYT • .TAMES E. CROSS • ROBERT S. HARRINGTON ROBERT J. LIECH I ARY DONALD LACt GAIL GLASS LAGE, TRUSTEE RICHARD H. WAGNER, TRUSTEE )o Page - 4 - • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 15, 1982 '> T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of a City -State Agreement for Funding of -te Vineyard Avenue Reconstruction Project and Recommenda- tion for Award of Contract to Low Bidder, Red Hill Construction ! The Vineyard Avenue Reconstruction Project from 8th Street to Arrow Routc has been pending for about two years because of federal environmental delays and funding availability problems. Authorization to request bids finally occurred a short time ago and eleven bids were received, ranging from $241,565 to $336,523. The low bid is 118 below the Engineer's Estimate and was received from the Red Hill Construction Company of Santa Ana. Completion of the job as planned with 86% Federal funds and 148 City funds will require a supplement to the master Federal Aid Urban agreement between the City and CalTrans. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolu- tion providing for completion of Supplement No. 5 to Agreement No. 08 -5420 and for award of the construction contract to Red Hill Construction, the low bidder. fully submitted, LBH: �0: jaa Attachments RESOLUTION NO.161 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5420, SUPPLEMENT NO. 5 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to take advantage of additional State funding for their construction of Vineyard Avenue; and WHEREAS, said funding requires the execution of Local Agency State Agreement No. 08 -5420, Supplement No. 5 by an authorized agent. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves the execution of Loca! Agency State Agreement_ No. 08 -5420, Program Supplement No. 5 and authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreement on its behalf and transmit to the State for pro- cessing. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982 • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • 1� Jon D. Mikels, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga Local Agenc% _. . _- _ Supplement No. 05 • To Local Agency-State Agreement No.. 08 -5420 Project No. M-MG= R194_( 2) —... PROGRAM OF LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL -A[D URBAN SYSTEM PROJECTS IN THE __,_____._,CITY_OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. —_ Lanl.iernrn Pursuant to the Federal -Aid for Urban Systems Acts. the attached "Program" of Federa;- k d Urban System Project, ni.ukvd "Exhibit H" is herelir incorporated in drat Master Agrremen! !,r die Federal -Aid Program achich iwas entered into between the aboee named LOCAL AGENCY and did STATE on December 5, 1979 _ , and is subject to all of ILe terns and conditions thereof. The subject program is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article II of the aforw:ue:a- Honed agreement under authndq of Cit /43DU , Resolution No. apprnsod hp the City CounciV&7CMNiKRYtKMXXXon • (See Cupp attached). • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Luoifnm+ey —_ Hy .— Ted: Approved for State Attest: flvrk .F Dimrn. al Tn ngemnnrm —__ -- —...- Uav District .08 Department of Tran,portatiun pa. u r a,u. I hereby Certify anon my own personal knowledge !hal budgeled funds are available for lbrs encunbrance. /7.. (S 1-- Accounong 0lhcer S�IISgrl Chapter Slalut Ilem F,cal Year Program NSU Calegary Fund Source 71wC.r,.r i���a -s'� Nt'6 u fiI Date: June 23, 1982 PR0GR,A11 OF FEDeuc AID URBAN SYSTEM RJECTS PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 05 EXHIBIT B Local Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Mj ect o, Location & Description Total Cost Est. Federal runts Hatching Fun s Construction and Construction Engineering $304,849 4- MG- R194(2) In San Bernardino $341,200 $36,351 County, City of Rancho Cucamonga on Vineyard Avenue from Bth Street to Arrow Route. Length 0.5 mile. Resurface, widen and traffic signals. *Local Agency Funds unless otherwise specified Special Covenants or Remarks: 1. All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the operation of the improvements, referred to in Article. VT MATM'f ENANCR of the aforementioned rooster Agreement will he p:•r to rn.c.l by Lhe City of Rancho Cur.amonra _ at rryul,rr iutr•rvols or as required for a ficient operation of Lhe. C.ongrL-lr,1 linptw.•uu•ulu. DLA4VlA (11/81) • • 0 EXHIBIT B Page 2 June 23, 1982 0 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will advertise, award and administer this project. is 3_ In awarding the contract, the Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be limited to the detail estimate amount approved by the Federal Highway Administration in the Federal -Aid Project Agreement (PR -2), or its modification (PR -2A), and accepts any increases in Local Agency Funds. 4. In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local Agency hereby reaffirms the "nondiscrimination assurances" contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for Federal -Aid Program. (f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJECT VINEYARD AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION 47%7YIRD AVENUE, RADCHD CUCA.40!;,.A ITEMS B iddcr's Bond I Clearing and c,u�birg 2 Poadway Excavation 3 Remove Existing Base and Surfacing 4 Asphalt Concrete 5 Aggregate Base 6 Placement only 8" A.C. dike 7 8' P.C.C. curb and gutter 8 8' P.C.C. curb only 4 Portland cement concrete Class B (Miscellaneous item. -'� cross 9ucter, spandrels, ain drive a,,roaches) 10 Minor concrete (minor strutures) 11 M"cellanecus iron and steel 12 1.. RCP Class IL 12500 .1UNli IT EES Red Hill BIO Conat._ ,41DU., IT L.S. 5000.00 15,000.00 748 C.Y. 5.00 13,740.00 621 S.Y. 1.35 10,283.35 134 Tons 23.00 73,232.00 353 C.Y. 11.00 14,883.00 d79 L.F. 1.10 2,286.90 077 L.F. 5.7 11,942.,75 249 L.F. 5.5 1,369.50 62 C.Y. .5 C.Y. 20 1E. 34L.F. 6,200.00 6,960.00 3,180.00 1,224.00 IPontana_Paving _ _ I COPP Contra 2,895.98 7.15 2,390.85 5.60 11,631.20 5.20 1,294.80 90.00 51580.00 450.00 6,525.00 1.00 21720.00 18.00 1,292.00 • • 78800.0 18,800.OD 4.4 a1 12.1M16.16 1.2 9,526.25 23.4 74,505.60 1OX 14,612.40 1.2 2.494.80 6.2 12,877,40 6.7 1.523.88 5.0 7,750.00 3. 7.540.00 1.0 2,204.80 B.0 2.312.00 PAGE 1 a( 4 DATE AUGUST 27, 1982 CONTRACT NO. FAU M /MR- 11194(2) 5000.00115,000.00 7.00 19.236.00 1.25 9,526.25 24.5 78,008.00 7. DC 9,471.00 l.Q0 2,079.00 7.0� 14,539.00 5.0 1,245.00 6 x820.00 5,800.00 6,360.00 1,224.00 15000.01] 15,000.00 5.001 13,740.00 2.0 15,242.00 24.5 78,008.00 72.8 17,318.40 1.2- 2,540.)5 6.3 13,085.10 4.4 1,095.fi0 3.11 1 7,316.00 Q. 7,250.00 1.14 2,438.00 1 6.04 1,564.00 15000.015.000.00 5.] 14.564.40 1.9 14,632.32 21.5x29,089.50 1.2 2,494.80 SA 11,215.80 4.5 1,120.50 90.0 5,SRO.DO 350.0 5,075.00 .8 1.082.00 53.0 1,802.00 J CITY OFWIID CUCAMONGA PAGE 2 of is • SUFFRRY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJECT LOCIT10I GATE CONTRACT NO. Red Hill Const. Fontana Paving COPP Contracting Anierican Const. Riverside Coin t. IfeGren Const. Ii E:'S QUANTITIES 610 A1IDUTIT _ BID AMOUNT 810 AIRR)hT 810 NI'IDI.T 810 N'('UCi CIO Jd' -0UOT sidle", Bond 36.00 972.00 44.00 1,188.00 13 115 PCP Class 111, 15000 27 L.F. 38.0( 1,026.00 66.00 1,782.00 38.00 1.026.00 46.00 ),242.00 14 18" RCP Class 11. 12500 59 L.F. 43.00 2,537.00 A2.0C 2,478.01) 66.00 3,894.00 40.00 2.360.00 46.00 2,714.00 40.00 2,360.00, 15 30" RCP Class I1, 12500 12 L.F 60.00 720.00 45.00 540.00 75.00 900.00 50.00 600.00 54.00 648.00 7D.00 840.00 16 Adjust manhole to grade 8 EA 150.00 1,200.00 140.OG 1,120.00 203.00 1,624.00 250.00 2,000.00 220.00 1,760.00 300.00 2,400.00 17 13" x 12" CSPA, 16 eat 76 L.F 49.CO 3,724.00 4MV, 3,116.00 61.00 4,636.03 30.00 2.280.00 47.W 3,92.00 43.Q3 3,040.0 18 Type "L" markers 11 EA 25.00 275.00 3901 429.00 26.00 286.00 30.00 330.00 42.00 462.00 24.0 264.00 19 Traffic signing L.S. 2200.00 2,200.00 2100.0C 2,100.00 2190.00 2,190.00 2600.00 2,60D.00 2300.00 2,300.00 2300.0 2,300.00 20 Traffic striping and painting L.S. 3200.00 3,200.00 3000.0 3.000.00 3800.00 3,800.00 4000.00 4,000.00 ]300.00 3,300.00 3300.0 3,300.00 21 McWI guard rail 110 L.F 33.00 3,630.00 42.0 4.620.00 35.00 3,850.00 36.00 3,960.00 45.001 4,950.00 46.0 5,060.00 22 Relocate guard rail 50 L.F 16.00 800.00 14.51 725.00 18.00 900.00 18.00 900.00 15.501 775.00 18.04 900.00 23 Traffic signal L.S. 2000.00 62,000.00 62953.01 62,953.00 5900.0 65,900_(10 DSW.D 70,5W.00 50W.WI4 65,_000.00 64W0.OI 64,000_00 241,564.50 54,286.73 56,055.29 S!59,864.25 5261,378.05 I 5 52,533.9? CITY OF RANCID COCA79NGA SUF ".WRY OF PROPOSALS OPENED FROJECT VIIIEYARO AVENUE STREET IMPROVEPEN TS LGCATICO UGFURO AVENUF. Ryn:110 CIIF %AODG1 I1EMS _ 8 -dam, 5-Good 1 ICl arin9 and GruoDing 2 Roadway Excavation 3 Remove Existing Base and Isurfacing 0 Asphalt Concrete 5 Aggregate Base 6 1Ildcervent only R" A.C. dike 7 8" P.C.C. curb and gutter 6 8" P.C.C. curb only 9 Portland cement concrete Klass 8 (Miscellaneous item, r-% 10 Minor concrete (minor It rut ores) 11 Niscellaneaus iron and eel 12 15t' RCP Class 1.1. 1250D OBeL'lT (T IE$ BID N:UU11T L .S. - -DD IS,.DDD. DD DO .S I- SB C.Y. 4.00 1099200 621 S.Y. 7,440.00 1.35 10,288.35 6,944.00 184 Tons 24.75 78,804.00 95.01 353 C.Y. .5 C.Y. 12.75 17,250.75 D79 L.F. 580.0 3.25 6,756.75 450.00 077 L.F. 9,425.00 6.25 12,981.25 1-20 249 L.F. 1.2 6.10 1,518.90 2,862.00 PAGE 3 of 4 DATE AUGUST P7, 1982 COUTRACT 140. FAU N /NP.- R194(2) E.L. Yeager Comt. Sully- Miller Contr. Gentry BrotLrrs I Laird Const. fllo AII:InI;T - BID 6'10100 0(U... PJ Y1 i - PuF I r'OICfi 15000.0 15,000.00 21000.00 21,000.00 5GDD.00 1S,000.DO 15000.0( 15,000.00 10.0 27,480.00 7.55 20,747.40 7.50 20,510.00 12.0 32,976.00 2.5 19,052.50 100 7,621.00 2.50 19,052.50 3.5 26,673.50 25.0 79,600.00 25.00 79,600.DO 25.75 81,986.00 32.0 101,868.00 12.0 16,236.00 13.00 17,589.00 15.00 20,295.00 15.0 20,295.C3 1.0 2,079. DO 2.0 4,158.00 4.50 9,355.50 1. 6,237.0➢ 7.0 14,539.0D 6.5 13,500.50 6.20 12,8.0.40 6.6 13.708.20 4.0 996.00 6.2 1,556 -25 5.00 1,444.20 6.30 1,568.70 62 C.Y. 120.00 7,440.00 112.0 6,944.00 100.0 6,200.00 100100 6,200.00 95.01 5,890.00 .5 C.Y. 600.00 8,700.00 60U.0 8,700.00 580.0 8,410.00 450.00 6,525.00 650.'17 9,425.00 20 lb. 1-20 2,544.00 1.2 2,650.00 1.7 2,862.00 1.0 2,120.00 1.21 2,650.00 34L.F. 55.00 1,870.00 38.0 1,292.00 61.01 2,07 4.00 55.0 1,0]0.00 85.CQ 2,890.00 • • • FROIECT LOG'Ql1ei CITY OF 110 CUCAMONGA PAGE 4 or 10 "l4 SEERY O #POSALS OPENED on TE CONTRACT 110 ITE'IS QUA „T I T IES - f4 laving__ _ _ 010 NIOp11T E,L._YCd gar Const_. Bi0 L'1p1LIT Sully. Miller Contr. 8[D iJ I0U11I Gentry Brothers 0[0 ! 'fNAi Laird Const. Gl0 "191;[ CIO WtOUNT Bid s,rs Oa,d _ � 15" RCP Class F11, 15200 7 L F. 60.0 1,620.00 39.00 1,053.00 61.01 1,647.00 53.01 1,431.00 00.00 2.160.00 14 18' RCP Class I1, 1'500 i9 L.F. 58.Of 3,422.00 44.00 2,596.00 63. S 3,717.00 WIN 3,540.00 73.1101 4,307.00 15 30" RCP Class 11, 12500 12 L. 75.0 900.00 53.00 636.00 74.0 088.00 80.0 960.00 60. p0 720.00 16 Adjust manhole to grade 8 EA 300.0 2,400.00 200.00 1,600.00 185.0 1,480.00 200-of 1,600.00 550.00 4,400.00 17 13" x 12" CSPA, 15 qs 16 L.FI 50. 4,560.00 32.00 2,432.00 60.0 4,560.00 7501 5,700.00 40.00 3,040.00 R Type 'L" markers 11 EA 24.2 266.75 3C.D0 330.00 27. 297.00 100.0c 1.100.00 25.00 275.00 19 Traffic signing LS. 23925 2,392.50 1000.00 1,000.00 2250.0 2,250.00 1200.0 1,200.00 2400.00 2,400.00 20 Traffic striping and Painting L.S. 3465.0 3,465.00 4000.00 4,000.00 3300.0 3,330.DC 4000.0 4,000.00 3500.00, 3,500.00 21 Metal guard rail 110 L.F 48.4 5,324.00 20.00 2,20D.OD 36.0 3,960.00 30.0 3,300.00 32.00 3,520.00 22 P.alocaLe guard rail 50 Ls 16.5 825.00 10.00 500.00 17.0 850.00 15.0 750.00 32.00 1,600.00 23 Traffic signal L.S. 68200.0 68,200.00 5000.00 65,000.00 68000.0 68'_000.00 68500.0 60,500.00 1400.OD 71,4_00.00 67,527.25 275,915.50 $276,267.15 289,418.60 I 336,523.40 ' r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i \GA %. STAFF REPORT �`�' .z DATE: September 15, 1982 > TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 7244, Bonds , Agreement a:_ -ee: Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement Messenger Investment Company Parcel Map 7244, the division of 4.56 acres of land into 9 lots located on the southside of Foothill, east of Elm Avenue within =he Daon Corp. project, is being submitted for final Council apnro"a.. Tentative approval was given by the Planning Commission on July , 1982. A Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $204,000 and a Labor and Material Bond in the amount of $102,000 is being submitted to guarantee the construction of interior streets and storm drains. The surrounding streets have previously been constructed. Also submitted for Council approval is a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future construction of a median island on Foothill Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting Parcel Map 7244, bonds, agreement and Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement. Respectfully $ubmitted, LBb(: BK: jas Attachments ,� • RESOLUTION NO. 162 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7244, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7244) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel flap Number 7244, submitted by Messenger Investment Corporation, Subdivider, and consisting of 9 parca;s. located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Red Oak Aver. -, a division of lot 27 of Parcel Mao 6206 as recorded in San Bernardino _ � ^ State of California was approved by the Planning Commission as proviced in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the require—er^: of Ordinance 23 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel flap Number 7244 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final flap, said subdivider submits for approval sail Final flap offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final flap delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map Number 7244 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of September 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 1• ATTEST: Lauren R. Wasserman, City Clerk l� i Jon D. Mikels, flayor • RESOLUTION NO. 163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR MESSENGER INVESTMENT CO. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Parcel Map 7244, located on the south side of Fcc-.-+ Boulevard, east of Elm Avenue, submitted by Messenger Investment Co. .as approved on September 15, 1982; and WHEREAS, Installation of a Landscaped Median Island estab —, ^e. as prerequisite to issuance of Building Permit has been met by entry in Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Messenger Co. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvenect Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of t`_ County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. of PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk KJ n Jon U. Mikels, Mayor PROJECT � SITE IT, ------------------- U, R Z, 062� -------- ----- 9 14 CITY OF RANCI 10 CUCVNIONGA title; P,M. 7244 A ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP rti N p1ge 10 pitch +•aa Ca._ Courier ::a. 6i73 Margin = 12 - 96 61:7 singular 6173 • 61 ,16 RECORDING REQUESTED RY and WREN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CCCS10NGA 9310 -C Base Line Road Post office P.O. 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN P`-- —' THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this .. v. 1981, by and between Messenger . - Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "De•: n, 1,;r er' . and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal (hereinafter re -erred to as "City'), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the �. ; ;.•�I,.n of P. h. 7244 for Industrial development, the City requ_res the construction of missing off -site street improvements, incicd'_r.q q�n n_M1�If landicaoed median Island adjacent -a the M property to be developed; and, WHEREAS, the Developer desires to postpone ccnst:.ctf^ of such improvements until a later date, as determined by the Cety; and, WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement Drovrded that the Developer enters into this Agreement requirinc the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do se by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer fails or neglects to do so and that the City shall have a lien upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's performance, and any repayment due City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTICS AGREE: 1. The Developer hereby agrees that they will install off- site street improvements, including ane.half land.raned median lol+nn in accordance and compliance with all applicable ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations of the City in effect at the time of the installation. Said improvement' shall be installed upon and along 7ho frant+a n fndthlll nlvd �I� • 2. The installation of said imorovemcnto s. _____ __ ___ __ed not later than. one (1) year following written notice t_ from the City to compose installation of the same. _..... . said improvement's steal: be at not expense to the Ciq. 3. In the event the Developer :ails or — -- the installation of said improvements in a timely ra,-er. .. any time thereafter, upon living the Developer writton s intention to do so, enter upon the property Sereina'e_: _. s_.._ - oa.. complete said improvements and recover all costs of c_r-_. ... -r_,-ad by the City from the Developer. 4. To secaro the performance by the Develvpc: __ terms and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the v_p --- _ to City of any funds which may be expended by City in improvements upon default by the Developer hereunder, c.._ es by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the Ciz, :be following described real property situated in the City of Par.=.-.= Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, t - -._t. Parcel Map 1244, as recorded in Book pages , O'fhc"l records of San Bernardino County, State of California. S. This conveyance is in trust, however, :o. t, purt-ses described above. b. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall fa L..:b_ - -y perform all of the acts and things by them to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be void: otherwise, it shall re ^a in in full force and effect and in all respeccn ;hall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and oblivations of the parties with eusneot thereto shall be. governed by thr; ..,,ns Of t,.. :ode of :..e Stat., of California, and any othor applicable :tneute• portaininn to more, „ on real property. 7. This AQro.meet shall be bindine uman and shall insure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assiins of cane of tho parties hn.rnto. B. To the extent required to give effect c_ ,.. -z enenr as a mortgage, the term "Developer- shall mean "mor-caccr' and the City shall be the ^mortgagee" as those terms are usn- .. Code of the State of California and any other atat8v - .. -- mortgages on real property. 9. If legal action is commenced to enfor -I . ., e provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum wh--nn i entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or nv -e right of the Developer to redeem the above-described :vpe : -• '•-- :he mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party s.. ^.a :. r. --,_- to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys' fees as sm.: c_ awarded by the Court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have exec ct_n Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY: DEVELOPER: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation JON D. MIRELS Na and ;itle MAYOR Please use Corporate Jurat When notarizing ATTEST: LAUREN M. WASSERAIAN City Clerk 'i \I 11)I lltll llR \I1 tSS of ♦IV nI �m rn i� l�,J.r .rr Septaa�ber .ry BZ Im. rr,.m rNI g 1 v,r,Ji:.rrr.m,-I „•afeff —t'eY Solvl GotSci\ - ,,. r, m,... Aea stdnt,_.. r,rrr.rr,rm,r,r�,�nrr.,r„r,e �rrr.... .�n mJ \mr .. • ♦... ^.inn raar rvvlr .. rl ,rrrn ..[. u r..l A. .nru. l'ur ru T T, ln.n..��ne..r•�I.rr i...�n.� 1 r. le.,rJ •n U.. 1minyAir.,.1 �.I V^ { •" •-�• ^a la j N,rxl :Mw rn:a e7, rtaa n�Iw.NtiY wn r. e 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCWIONGA . ,IMPROVEME4T AGREERETIT FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 7Z44 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is - - into, in conformance with the provisions of the Panicipal C. .. att: -% of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a mu ;ci. ._ hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City a Investment Corporation Keremarter referred to as the Developer WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code. Developer has requested . -v City of Parcel Map Number 7244 in acccrc :cce .. . he C :x provisions of the report of the Engineer thereon, and any thereto; located on the east side of Elm Avenue and Maple Place a•: .... _ of Foothill Boulevard WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be net by -._ _.r eloper prior to granting the final approval of the parcel map; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improve-er.t 'ec_rity as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are Gee .' • to equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the pucosr cr -secs +q said approval; ROW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the :evelc-er as follnwS: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all improvements described on Page 3 hereof within nine months frca the date hereof, as per Section 2.12 of Ordinance No. 2B. 2. The tem. of this agreement shall be nine months co=pecicg cm c,e Late of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said tern has been extended as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to mmolete the pro- visions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein, 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to ckdpl'y with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any lawful weans, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. 5. Encroachment pemnits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right of way, and the Developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the re- gulations contained therein. Non - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. b. Public right of way improvement work required shall be constructed in con - formance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. I• i oge . IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT • 7. Pork done within existing st' ^ets shall be diligently pursued to c : -ple- tion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all worn rn tce event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all - --s expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor . ... �, means. B. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocati ^r. : moval of any component of any irrigation water system in cc-c1 a the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer ara re .- er of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible far removal of all loose •- other debris from the public right of way resulting from worn c. .e -1 the adjacent property or within said right of way. 10. The O:veloper shall plant and maintain parkway trees as direr Ze. "-e Caaouaity Development Director. 11, The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to tiara -tee completion of the terns of this agreement shall be subject to tte approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said 1-; .,t security shall be not less than the amount shown below: IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED: Faithful performance Bond S904 Onn On Material and Labor Bond $102,000,2C IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all fomalitieS required by law ca :ne Cates set forth opposite their signatures: DEVELOPER BY: I Z Z, BATE: it P rs BY: ` DATE: -NAP. WITNESS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA a municipal corporation CLERK DATE ST %11 01' x' \x Ifnk,, ror.ry ni orange �ss ^m�. B- _— m•.rtember a -_ w9_2.nn rci,. �mo�r•u. mn -nr.�. r sn W. Mes_sen err Jr. ra <,n aoni- „ r n.n .,c i.. ul :ln me nu r.I�m� rn inn �•�r •^r�l•• xt i i nllvxaim,Na,l. r Y .n FT l'1O ronr4M er imam �- � naa xu la MiiM rarll ' 11 CIV OF RANCHO CIi MONCA CONSTRUCTION AND BOND E57VOTC ENCROACID ENT PERMIT FEE SChF.DULE (Attach to "Inspector's Copy ") DATE: Au9DSt 20. 1982 PERMIT NO. CONPI= ' "n9 File Reference P.M, 7244 City Dtavir, ::o .'OTC: Does not include current fee for vrill, p mil n: .- meat deposits. CONSTRUCTION COST ESrmm Cc:a Tfd'MG:: COST $185.980.00 cD'.TP..Gr:a' IOSTS 18.598.00 ,on-L CONCTe C:T)0:: COSTS 5204.578.00 FAITNFUL PER1GR'6VICE TO I:D (100,) $204,000.00 IAMC AND I:r THI,N. LJ:.D (50X) Gov F.:If.I::C[R I:;G INSif CiI09 FF.F. $ 8,064 ,0 (FFE 561NULE) P.O:ID (MSH) 5 ),650.00 ( Cry^ OORD 30. _90 -27 -70 FRDIIi2t. $1,060.00 • kA t•3'ii v(IL P ?. RiroN:. \P:CG ::08D wd ERGIS, the City Council of the City of Rancho r'.c "•+o ^'i, state of California, and MGSBtHOJ12WEa'd11R CDARUAt2Ct LOLa46R5 CQSTS0CI20RR (herein fter u stg natpd as "install an camp whereby principal agrees to install and t, n.,olete cur,.` e public improvements, which said agrement, dated 198 and identified as project PARCEL MAP _ 1s heree by re fsr Ferree 14(EREd5, said principal i, required under the C + ment to furnish a bond for the faithful performer - ... the principal and -AC2MA aSUNANCT CWYl. a as 'surety, are r. - - -,ly n the penal sum of WD IlOOmILD FOUR T�SRPD AND p /+wimp Do lore (5'06r000.P0— ) he Unr ted States, For the pa,c.nt of , ich sum sae 1 an,! - u ads, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executers a..,. .ditni- trators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the arc, ounded p�'incipal, his or its heirs, executors, adninis :r_ :aa. successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to end ::a xnd ell and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and pry :rsions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as there -, provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at one Use and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects accord. -I to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harm.ess City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein s u.at<d, the this obliaation shall become null and void; otherwise,:. :.ball la and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and foes, including reasonable attorcoy's fees, incurred by city in successfully enforcing such obligi•i;s, .__ to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect. its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument her he duly executS(t by the Principal and surety above named, on ttuobr ] !2551NER XMVZTNM CORPOP6TICti Syt AW .. OLTM / va'fott CO. Py d A 11tWFYT� O 60 P.O. am 77U Sarbtmk, Co. 91310 � r j � • 0 W. 590-27-20 Presiwa inclndal Ln Pert @YM.V lined LAiYI!i .UIO 'I:1TE3ld L:: C:� lQin I: ii!; P.CAS, tP.c Cp^ C -• 1 of r!:. it• n[ .• °, �. c.. -. of Cal or ifn 1[�Yr --0� fl1'0 ^`1S20NxM., __ the ci:•.a ftcr dcs:gcatud os 'p':n p vo enter ^'.0 I., to _ whereby err,- .cipal agrees to install and ,.empl.tc ccitain ._... public improve... acs, which said agreement, dates tdaht.fiod as nrn}ect P.100II. l01P L2 }� . xs hereby as- -S, ender the terms of said agreement, .n upon the porfornanre of file a ent oa:Icect bond with the City of Rancho Cuccmonga to - a n, to Bch reference i5 wde in Title 15 (commenci, 1 n 1083) cf Part g of Division 1 of the Civil Code o. - ifornia. I C1Dtt, TiI E:?E FGRE, said principal and the undersigned as .eery, are held firmly bound unto the City of P.ancho Cucamonna 11 mnL actors, subcontractors, laborers, materialaen and ot-r pe a ens eeploped in the p.rfremancc of the ar.rrs.id agreement m (erred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the su -. cv.: 00l�A:D TalO MU5AMD A W /100"" a01GR5 Dollars (a 1 for mater:alz - -rsned or labor thereon o any kind, or 7 or amounts due under -he Unemploy-ent Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount bereinabove at forth, and also in case suit is brought upon. _:is toed pav in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and rcasor..Z.. nses and fees, ioc`uding reasonable attorney's fees, ieca.-red b• in suces sfully enforcing such obligation, to he awarded and d by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in cbe .rent therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bend shall :e to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, a- -- - .. 'itied tc file claims under Title 15 (commencing with section ico3) Part s of Division 1 of the Civil Codc, so as to give a r:ti:t of ion to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. should the condition of this bond be fully performed, than this }motion stall become null and void, otherwise it stall be and main in mull force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension E tine, niter.. Lion or addition to the term. of said agreement or the oecifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its bligaticnn on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such hange, .%tension, alteration or addition. ICI aiT:ILss wiii;REof, this instrument has been duly executed by the - inmpal and surety above named, on %OPCWMer 7 1982. :0:s00wet nfr !THMT COm4mAT1011 — CO. �Tt e7.aF P.O. adz •1714 1 awbs". Co. HSU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT C DATE: September 15, 1982 F e II> TO: City council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 7555, Bonds and Agreement anc! Vacation of a portion of Pittsburgh Avenue - R. C. Industrial Company Parcel Map 7555 dividing 25.95 acres of land into 3 parcels, located south of 8th Street on the east side of Milliken Avenue was tenta- tively approved by the Planning Commission on July 14, 1982. A Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $86,000 and a Labor and Material Bond in the amount of $43,000 is being submitted to guaran- tee construction of interior streets. A small portion of Pittsburgh Avenue, previously dedicated by Parcel Map 5760, requires vacation. This portion, as shown on the attached map, is being vacated due to the relocation of the south property line of parcel 4 of Parcel Map 5760. This adjustment to the property line was completed through the filing of a lot line adjustment. Since this vacation is for the purpose of relocation, a summarily vacation is appropriate and no public hearing is required. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 7555, the vacation of a portion of Pittsburgh Avenue and accepting the bonds and agreement. fully submitted, LBlf VK: jaa Attachments ?ci :• I.0 V -021 Exhibit "B" SB . NORTHERLY LINE OF ,7 S93g.w PITTSBURGH AVE. AS SHOWN ON P. M.NO, 5760] I � l ' A•16'12' 74 R-85.00" -1 L: 24.80 8 u u lo' 1 30 "' ... 1/" CITY OF RANG 10 CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION N u iY VICINITY MAP PARCEL, 4 NO' 22' Ciao 24.45 TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING \N 0' 22' 01-W // 22.67' NORTHWEST CORNER PARCEL 3 A N t';3 76 • 119 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 7555 E` ` Lue.r: rm e11a,... ", oulu�Nrt:srz• 4.0 a L1 m 11LU i �°vz.. e. .•y. r L, ois:a c' -:z�n. a. n.a.+.�1 x auDl.Ln .al ' �:, «'y,� •¢- b Dort s- +a: + ,.. ru4oln xslri+u�.;, nia rm ivon� uL.. u'.ii:a is .. >. tii cY; an9vn4. Inq r.eN.' V;n si -43n 4 i}uF r 2 UIILI II[S' u.f[. it ilw; RIf.M .m. 'r. NtT SRI, SPI;WM141[4M AI[DIEIS1.1 [1 U. #l0. ij lit, 4v0it, 14[r12R;4LM�4n1IL[rNY1[I<DMS k5- Y I t }E✓wv+ O[ 0 Yom_!'. . ,ttt ^lni., a'W1•IKL 1 "• 1244 MIL. aa[jif Gie '^ te °rt ivl"celwn uo1 r y11 l ro.1 1eoo n 111 0ri.M in1 rry v11 w . 1 i ise "na N Dr 1.11L 17 o /su :+uI .n. vI i s .1 , ... tC1.:L U+.S,: Y.ns X.RS yy 11'— ASS CJ- „`tlE ZONED M =2 _— / :P IM 7555 it L/C ♦m"�.raa0 :, \— �- ,;:_Lm �_ *> — �`�y_M eN*i .:-"-� - /- '•- -\Yti� awl :'• J `dal \nt2� -J.� P'Oa 1^. •,3/_ '`� .ema� .. � •y �_/ a V o fs":iC :_: EIDp!.'EYt t \ v,ol .0. 1 ara l.r rrZ'^`i m.. e.m I� 24 ^s` VICINITY MqP RESOLUTION NO. 164 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7555, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7555) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7555, submitted by R. :. Industrial Company, Subdivider, and consisting of three (3) parcels, located on the east side of Milliken, south of 8th Street, being a of Parcel 4 and 5 of Parcel Map 5670 as recorded in Book 54, Pages 53 - was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Sabdivis,-a Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance 28 of :a,_ City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 7555 is the Final Map of the divisicn of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: of 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate on their behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map Number 7555 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: - 116 Lauren fl. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mikels, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 165 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUM14ARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF PITTSBURGH AVENUE WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets ! ^s and Highways Code, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga is authoriz. -, summarily vacate a portion of the City street hereinafter more parcic ::larly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitte: a portion of Pittsburgh Avenue is unnecessary for present or prospect- :e public street purposes because it has been superceded by relocation. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Guca-cnca as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby makes its order vacating that cordon of street on Map V -021 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal descripti-n which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and "B ", and by reference -ade a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said portion of Pittsburgh Avenue no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement. SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren N. Wasserman, City Clerk -'t Jon 0. Mike s, Mayor EXHIBIT "A" • That certain parcel of land in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County c. San Bernardino, State of California, being a portion of Pittsburgh Avenue as shown on Parcel Flap No. 5760, filed in Book 54, Pages 53 through Parcel Maps, records of said County, more particularly described as f.,.: -os: Commencing at the northwest corner of Parcel 3 of said Parcel Map No. 5' thence, along the boundary line of Parcel 4 of said Parcel Map said bounaar7 line also being the easterly right -of -way line of said Pittsburgh Avenue, N 00 °22'01" W, 22.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence, contir;:r^ along said easterly right -of -way line N 00 °22'01" W, 24.45 feet to the northerly line of Pittsburgh Avenue as shown on said parcel map; thence, perpendicular to said easterly right -of -way line, S 89 037'59" W, 3.59 feet to a point on a non - tangent curve, concave southwesterly, having a radius of 85.00 feet, a radial of said curve to said point bears N 72 °55'05" E; thence, southeasterly and southerly along said curve through a central anc: >_ of 16 °42'54" an arc length of 24.80 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Said parcel of land contains 0.001 acres. Go I-1 L J 0 1' EXHIBIT S 83• SCALE i•30 , JS, Jy N ONTN E(RY LINE OF W ITTS URGH AVE A5 SHOWN SHOWN ON P. M NO 57S_ -•'J'2 � \N �•9P0 A,W4Y5i 0'22' Ci'W R•85.00' L: 2A BO' 2A :5 Ld 8 i ARCEL TRUE ?.-,•„ _ 1 Z O F II u Q %u N O'22'31. 22 Q7 GAO' , Li ;sir O. 90 30 NORTHWEST PARCEL 5 cc m 3 N ~ o F EL r: Q SEVENTH STREET JOSEPH B. HYDE PE, H, C CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER uenrtp n BJ 602 HILDA STREET ANAHEIM CAL FCRIRA 92806 [nl[.eo et: B J PH Vlel 991. p600 eor� 7.8.92 e n. - I* CouriCo er .Margin CITY OF RANCHO COCAMON:A IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ' FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 7555 rd . .31 4.1 (a) 0:.2 KNOW ALL MEN By THESE PRESENTS: That this - _ -yde and entered into, in conformance with the provision. - __- Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. _ fornia, a e:unicipal corporation, hereinafter referred -.r is by and between said City and RC Associates II he[ntnaf :er refereed to as t e OeveloPe i. WITNESSETH: THAT, WY,EREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer -,s i.extad approval by the City of Parcel Mao ;lumber 7555 in acc_r: -rte the provisions of the report of :he City Engineer thereon, amendments thereto; located on the Southeast Career of MilT, _ Eighth Street ; and WHEREAS, the City has established certain requlrerer.:s to met by said Developer prior to granting the final approval _. tn parcel map; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and postrnc c- improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved b l Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completicnof sa_ requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all improvements described on Dace l hereof x - :ne aihs from the date hereof, as per Section 2.12 of Ordinance ;:o ^2 R rc 2. The term of this agreement shall be nine months com- mencing on the date of execution hereof by the City. This accee:tent shall be in default on the day following the last day of the ter, stipulated, unless said term has been extended as hereinafter p - vided. 3. The Developer may request additionaL time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, :nclpd ing construction. standards, cost estiretc, and suf- ficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. T£ the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the previsions Of this nyruerent, the City shall nave the right at any tine " :av -n „aid prov:s'O'o • 1,,plaed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from -aid Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. S. Encroachment permits shall be obtained h_v the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of nny work within the public right -of -way, and the Developer shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations contained therein. Non - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the city, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6. Public right -ef -way improvement work r P _ _- nail be • constructed in conformance with, approved improvement- ' - cis rd Specs. °ivations, and Standard Drawings and any special - - - r- thereto. Construction shall include any transitions a..o.3c s .._. incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. 1. Work done within existing streets pursued to completion; the City shall have the richt and all work in the event of unluseified dolay i recover all cost and expense incurred from the Develcper- :.._ .. -13 contractor by any lawful means. B. The Developer shall be responsible for • -- relocation: or removal of any component of any irrica _c :�. . - tem in conflict with the required work to the satisfactxo.. :f Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for ro-.ova. : loose rock and other debris from the public right-of-way r from work done on the adjacent property or within said r.cr._- _ - -•aq. 30. The Developer shall plant and maintain par.way cr :vs as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished h e - cper to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shalt -_ =-ect to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount improvement security shall be not less the amount shown '_e. __. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED: Faithful Performance Bond $86,000.00 Material and Labor Bond $43,000.00 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto bave caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signa- u,.cs: RC Associates I1, A California General Partnership DEVELOPER BY: O'Donnell, Brigham 6 Partners/ t ! y�l DATF: 7 -✓—d= BY: Oltmsns Investment Corpora Lion DA ^. E: Q -� -7- WITNESS: DATE:_ CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA a municipal corporation NAYOR CITY CLERE •' BOND NO. S80 -27 -_P PRENIUN: 51:290.00 • ralTnrr.L rr.�rru : :, : :cE ro : :D Flii -c RGAS, the City Council of the City of P.ancto of Culiforn'_a, and RC ASSOCIATES IIa a aalifOrniagene_!_car _ cer-S in (horolno_'r desig natCd d "pr:nctp l'1 have: On CC cot whereby principal agrees to inn:all And corn pl ete cca '.. -, u ..b! 4c nd idcements, which said a9 roc men t, 1701, and idantif icd as project PARCEL NILLIKW AVE AND eIpTTlsTiR ]s hereby retcrred co h reor; and, W E RE,15, said principal is required under the ter^: :f agreement to furnish a band for the faithful perfa.r., - +- agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and AETNA INSURSNCT_ ^ Y3A:N, a connecticot cornoratien as 'curet„ are r — - -ly bound unto tF.c City aE Rancho Cucamngu (herd r.aftcr u:: , in the penal sum of EIGHTY -SI% THOUSAND AND N01IQC HS OCLr..S - Dollars (SQ�y00qBB_��_1 ':�Y[ -' :'i �r the rated States, for the payment or M11ch n" um wwell o be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executers cndadcini- stracors, jointly and severally, firmly by these present. I The condition of this Obligation is such that if t],- bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, adminisc ;e: -s successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and a - 1dc by, and well and truly keep and perform the cnvenancs, conditions a.A ,:A. is ns in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as tiicrern provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at he time - and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects acearding to their true intent and meaninq, and shall indemnify and save tar -less City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null And void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As A part of the Obligation secured heroby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall he included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable .tttn[ ^m: 's ` Ca-' inr'urted by City in successfully enforcing such Obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the nOrccment or to the wort: to be performed thereunder Or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this Fond, and it does heroby waive notice of any such change, extension of '17.c, Alteratic or addition to the terms of the agreement. or to the work Or to the specifications. IN IiSTNE58 NIIEBFOP, this instrument h.. boon duly executed by the pri nci paA and surety above name.", On Septenibe =3 1981. l RC ASSOCIATES II, a California general partnership by O'BONNELL, BRIGILV4& PARTNERS /500THERN, partner By: by OLT �5 VESTMENT CORPORATION, partner Byr i r f nrrNA INSI/RANC COMPAN i By vl C^ R ar A au, A torney- a- Ac BOND :10. SSO - -7-3 Premium isain ad oft Per znz,cge Bond LABIR A:: 'd1iEF E :S, -:.e City come 11 of the -- t." of 3ancho Cer..- --.a +. .:vte of Calafornls, ord RC ASSOCIATES II. a Cali�f{D}a- iin=,11.�����p (he r etc af :cr des iv. ^.atci " ;..rva :c- -o.a .. -c :It public:' p sl ge_s to is call and mPLme : public fcment ^„ which said agree ant, dated Sir and ado,,jiwd as reject PARCEL MAP ]SSS, 30GTHlVFa: - •_ AVE.A p Ej4F111 STE$ET__.. —' as hercev - lierea.; ,...... WEER -AE, under the terms of said age ;n m. pr_n_. before anb_rinl aeon the eer.rcr^au, o: - _ . sufficcont payee nt band with the City of 21 -1- -no C :c vr. ^.r .: .. _ _ the claims to whfch refer. ^.nee is bade in T-'tie 15 (C[-- -- -- -- section 3092) o` pact g of Di•:' -Sion 3 of the C., -1 Gds of California. NC'.a. T: {_9E 70R-, said Principal and the surety, are held firmly bound cat. the Cit of .-.,- -- all cent- actors, subcontractors, laborers, t __ persons emolaved in the performance of the aforesais anrocn '• referred to ie the afarossid Code of civil Prncedere .. in .._ _..n __ FORTY- TBR;.F TBOBEAND AND NO /100TH DOLI-0� _ ^ Collars (5 4),000 -00 _7. = -an seals wi ns l :m or laeoe thereon or any kind, or or am..a n: s c _ twee Unemploy -.ent Insurance Act with respect to sure •work o. v ... _ said surety will nay the same in an amount not exceeder- hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought sn= -- tend will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, Costs and extensor and fees, including reasonahle attorney's `fees, - a by Cat, in successfully enforcing such oblic,,tira, to be awarded c- Eiwed by the court, and to be tried as costs and to to ins'_ ::.'.cd cn to ludgront therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that t. ._ shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, conpa vies, ind --yarn Cons entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with :eet:or. : =22) of Part J of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to gave a richt of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought spot t,_. -c..a. should the condition of this bond be fully perfor-ed, than t.`.ia obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shah be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulate, and agrees that no chance, extension of tine, alteration or addition to the terms of said agree -eat or the specifications accompanying the some shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of aay such change, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS W11EREOP, this instrument has been duly encoutcd by the Pr,nciP31 and surety above named, OaSepcember 3 , 1932. RC ASSOCIATES II, a California general partnership by O'DONNELL, BRIGHAM 66 PARTNERS /SOUTHERN, partner By• �7 /✓ BY __ by 0 f. •, L I STNE2VT CORPORATION, partner By; AEC: AETNA IN$nRFNC COMPAN By:, ai.r P 0 0 B bar, ccormy n- ar P 0 B 7716 ax BurbaNC, Ca. 91510 0 • 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r, C %%.o STAFF REPORT ° �� F ' I:Z DATE: September 15, 1982 _ "> TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Annexation No. 10 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract 9658 Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract No. 9658 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and setting the public hearing for October 20, 1 > ?2 Also attached for approval is the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 10. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report and setting the date of public hearing for October 20, 1982. Respectfully submitted, LBFVK:jaa Attachments GjiI ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.I ANNEXATION NO.10 I � P1 � Yr _ i I[ I I title; CITI <)P RANCI 10 Cl CA\lO \CA p ®\ TR. 9658 ti r.N( ;INGI'.RI \G DIVISION w T 'iin"'°' VICINITY NIAP 1 \`II �,� /, RESOLUTION NO. ,'b U A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on September 15, 1982, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file wi'h the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the sub- divisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby prelimin- arily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby pre- liminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT; i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Engineer's Report for ANNEXATION NO. 10 to the Landscape Maintenance District Number 1 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new tracts into Lands -aoe Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 4483 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the Tract Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by the developer and have been approved as part of the improvement plans for Tract 9658. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in conformance with the Planning Commission. Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract Map and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and deveoped work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (S.30) per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cast data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (including Annexation No. 10) comprised of -0- square feet of landscaped area) is shown below: -7 i Total Annual Maintenance Cost • S.30 x 261,346 square feet = $78,403.80 Per Lot Annual Assessment 78,403.80 - 1492 = 52.55 Per Lot Monthly Assessment 52.55 - 12 = 4.38 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6_r the attached Assessment Diagram, Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are de- ignated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced by the amount saved by the District due to said homeowner maintenance. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hereby incor- porated within the text of this report. • SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for Annexation No. 10 is found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, 1983, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the 1982/83 fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings, 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments, • -2- ,.i r �C. RESOLUTION NO. & 7 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS IN- TENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT' RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Licntir,c Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and ccn- venience require and it is the intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and o,leration of those parkways and facilities thereon dedicated for common belt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the bour.nar :es of the propos ^d maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees. grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, • and wails in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foreaoing described work is to be located within roadway right -of -way and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 10 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ". SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 10 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. 79 -89, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution N has approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, ll�, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 10, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of • said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the sane manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the -'.tv Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearinc uoon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby give, that on the 20th day of October, 1982, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any ar all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment cistrict, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried our :r why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution c* Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of property in which each singer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the ti -e set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. ;f the signer of any protest is not hsown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscapino and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work • herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION O Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 61961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The — Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: • Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk �, i CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY MGIY fas nLl . INSTRUCTIONS 1. Claims for death. Injury to Perron or to Personal property insist be filed not later than 100 don alter the oceurrenee. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 2. Claims for damages to real property most be filed not later than 1 year after the Yecumnce. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 2. Read entire claim before filing. a. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim torso must be signed on Page 2 at bottom. g. Attach separate sheels. if necessary, to give fail details. SIGN EACH SHEET. 7. Claim must be filed with City Clerk, IGov. Code Sec. 915a) TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA State Business RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP CLAIM No.._ ._ CITY OF RA:h;HO C.itAfii ONCA ADNINIST'r ATI.^, ?l ScID ') -1y?2 AN PM ��S)9iml�I1�111213141D1s GC.7_ Age of Claimaht (_ r,a:ural person) Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: (!cwJl•JE At- cAIiCZ, sA>CD S'f , ic- -Vl/7,Q,i' y/7[/ Now did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars. _ QiT -' tT' .may -'�t'/ C�c .+YiYC'J.6iA J`i'ii•' %��e? 7%C: T;v'. ,•. � cif // q i/ �i: / -�',T �i:,�y 111:r",x'ic?' !e"-Jew_s T 7% 77.E or INJURY occur? Give Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, and Ideate on diagram on reverse side of this sheet, where appropriate, give street names and address and measurements from landmarks: .L'r=�' ?7.�:(C!a_•? C..' /7i� Ji. G��<:. =+l�f f�/'C: r' O /A�I_:Li %t�.) What particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or damage, if known: /1', %Ce' ✓C� ('it ( ?i S"U .:Y)•'.;�n.c= '/ ".�i •� j.?f � -'% jC° /�i/ /1-C (� T.:F =' %' /C Q!.'.'('�. ia. ... i?�.. Cii' w%- �'Ti'.�', r'iJ / ✓77J ✓(:j What DA, %CAGE or INJURIES do you claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed: y.� %r'. ��� �'�'•'X -I •T� �'f: /.� /,' 77X ;e.vr Gt, %•!`: ciL� r / -..i •.G rJi rfn !d .'!•l, /=i What AMOUNT do you claim an account of each item of injury or damage as of date of presentation of this claim, giving bans of computation: %i= r'� !_' /• <','.. Fii ClC'7I ,.JAG; i C?-.i �?C: Wive ESTII.IATED AMOUNT as for as known you claim on account of each item of prospective injury or damage, giving basis of sEE PACE 3 (ONTR) r/ THIS CLAIM MUST RE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE Insurance payments received, if any, and names of Insurance Company: /i -! A Espendnures made on account of accident or injury: (Date — item) (Amount) Name and address of Witnesses, Doctors READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets. including North. East, South, and We,:; :nd :; a'e ;:ace of accident by "X" and by showing house numbers of distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City vehicle when you first saw it, and by "B' Irca::,.n of ycurself or your Vehicle when you first saw Cat vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A -I" anc loca: ; :d r.f .., _ :. < :: , r your vehicle at the time of the accident by "13-1" and the point of impact by "X." .VOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. FOR OTHER ACCIDENT5 I IL LZ SIDEWALK CUR3­s PARKWAY 7 SIDEWALK CUR K FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS L 71--___1 F 819noILIAre. of Claimant or per�on hl ng nn hu behalf giving Typed Name: Date relay nship to Claimant i NOTE: Presentation of a falscrclaim is a~felony (Cal. Pen. Code Sec. 72). CLAIMS MIST DE FILED NITII CITY ,CLERK (GOV. CODE SEC, 915a). ESTIMATE OF REPAIRS iSlorl'�w��l n. cMrflp 4ne..rl cry.r v.nlclamtMr ,ur wVmloM.e cltw M lcom ^Iy.E � I � W. cr. no •MpOnaIEM for O .mMn O Wa. �clw Nt i Iln rr — el Ilia cnnll. • Nml er VnV a nV 4uy oFeM ow (ol. I L�aNN • ' ..... Lr.• i .�. �� ' "^C767 7 _ ... _' _ 17 ' ]' _ (714)629.8912 — Ya.a Y E. 2nd ST.. POMONA, CA ��� l � ^••• av�oNr Jt - .v I - 9 I I 1 111 11] 1 !1• I•ar -ona .a ..1 .......o aw.•a co i 1e In I 1 i I 11e I ml i iSlorl'�w��l n. cMrflp 4ne..rl cry.r v.nlclamtMr ,ur wVmloM.e cltw M lcom ^Iy.E � I � W. cr. no •MpOnaIEM for O .mMn O Wa. �clw Nt i Iln rr — el Ilia cnnll. • Nml er VnV a nV 4uy oFeM ow (ol. I L�aNN • ' ..... Lr.• i .�. �� ' 7 _ ... _' _ ' ]' _ Y ,T r I - 9 I I 1 111 11] 1 !1• it !151 i 1e In I 1 i I 11e I ml i 711 1231 7.1 I 70 AODITION& NYI 011'4 w ..... .... 10 .... ... ... ASw M111fe DATE M 11Ye PRO ... IYOINT . run Was INN M Is~ f+N .. a sm MIN9[S YITHIN! WHIM CNr1N nae N NM IN "'"'M ANN M1 eNAa11e NNIN Nov= PMTS an, NNY DyIN NN AM.A N MN wee MN Ie NIIII. NYY "IwA NM INI ifyN11Y1, Adi Mna N ur. Try N mi Ihel ON call hN NYII N IaNIIe lranevnT eNNrN SIOWn [elm 10 0115 AMR "Till. Yr Yr Ne N ImM F Ar eNMwew N AN romi INN 11 o nY. M NAY NNMnhh IM h MNN NNeYNIf1 M Ilele aelNr N eeNA IN el 1 M msmor, Pi 1M" "aM IM 1YNIVN UMMINM IM II"NIIN N MN IWIIIr . will" Ml —1 InIANI NrN N M 1%%A NI YNA. aM n NMn "Re". Pale M IS%I. We, rlNePeIY e1-- I IN W YIh ee/e I MI NN IM Nwe. raNrwl a M. W NeN .w1 NrMI IInMNM mw YI erM. I %YInN.Nyly. ii . f = UI lul ur.1111 Arwh. we. ope" ITEm (TEI PI / i I SUBLET / Noy A IRSURAREE DEDLCT11lE MIST BE SALES TAX Ki CAR IS RELEASED. I �.' M'clmms, NwNn IIN11 b Ian• no._ar_ /.nun ewlmNN to TOTAL CLAIM FOR DAMAGES CITY ' TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga AM :JO? City Hall y 9320 Base Line Road •18(9(10(ll Ya(?i 3 q(5(6 Cucamonga, California _ •tU�vr. The undersigned makes the following claim for damal:es against the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to Section e_J of the Government Code: A. NAME: Thomas Bryant ADDRESS: 8204 Klusman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA PHONE: 714) 989 -3246 B. POST OFFICE ADDRESS TO WHICH THE PERSON PRESENTING CLAIM DESIRES NOTICES TO BE SENT IS AS FOLLOWS: Vinnedge, Lance 5 Glenn, Inc. Attorneys at Law 204 North San Antonio Avenue Ontario, California 91762 C. DATE, PLACE. AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES OR TRANSACTION . WHICH GAVE RISE TO THE CLAIM ASSERTED ARE AS FOLLOWS: DATE OF ACCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE: .5Z29/82_ PLACE: Intersection of 9th. Street and Vineyard City of Rancho Cucamonga. • IF MOTOR VEHICLES WERE INVOLVED, SHOW MAKES, YEARS, MODELS, AND LICENSE NUMBERS, AND OWNERS OF ALL VEHICLES: 1976 brown Chevrolet Malibu, California License No. 764 NQJ, registered to Carmen Garcia; and motorcycle owned by claimant. DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES: On Saturday, May 29, 1982, Thomas Bryant was driving his motorcycle along Vineyard Avenue when the car driven by Carmen Garcia pulled out from Ninth Street and travelled east, crossing Vineyard and causing a collision of the two vehicles. At the time of the accident referred to herein Vineyard Avenue at or near its juncture with Ninth Street and areas adjacent thereto was in a dangerous condition in that, among other things, there were certain view • obstructions, created by the roadway creating a hazardous condition for forseeable careful users of the above mentioned roadways. The traffic control devices were not sufficient for the intersection. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is further claimed to have notice of the dangerous condition of its property since the road condition complained of existed for an unreasonable length of time during which the City ,aa reasonable opportunity to correct said condition. T.. ^.e City of Rancho Cucamonga has a continuing duty to maintain its property in a safe condition. D. A GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INDEBTEDNESS, OBLIGATION, INJURY, DAMAGE OR LOSS INCURRED SO FAR AS IT MAY BE KNOWN AT THE TIME OF PRESENTATION OF THIS CLAIM IS AS FOLLOWS: Personal injuries sustained by the claimant, Thomas Bryant, property damage, loss of earnings and earning capacity, and medical expenses incurred. THE AMOUNT CLAIMED AS OF THE DATE OF THE PRESENTATION OF THIS CLAIM, INCLUDING THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ANY PROSPECTIVE INJURY, DAMMGE OR LOSS, INSOFAR AS IT MAY • BE KNOWN AT THE TIME OF THE PRESENTATION OF THIS CLAIM, TOGETHER WITH THE BASIS OF COMPUTATION OF THE AMOUNT CLAIMED IS AS FOLLOWS: Medical expenses incurred to date in an undetermined amount and medical expenses to be incurred in the future in an unknown amount, loss of earningsand earning capacity together with general damages in the amount of $1,000,000.00 WITNESSES, IF ANY, WERE AS FOLLOWS: Unknown to date, investigation is continuing. DATED: September 2, 1982 VINNEDGE, LANCE S GLENN, INC. By—- 'lL�.!i Harold J.. Lance Attorneys for Claimant -2- u • 0 T0: City Council FROM: Beverly Authelet VL11 Vl' 11A1 \V 11V VVVAI,L V3 \VA MEMORANDUM September 10, 1982 Council approved the release of the Labor and Material Bond for Praver Bros Investments at the September 1, 1982 city council meeting. Praver had submitted a bond to the city in the amount of $77,400.00 which included the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor & Material Bond in one security instrument. I need to have the Council authorize the full amount of $77,400.00 before I can release it. According to Engineering, all work has been completed, therefore, they were willing to release the Labor & Material portion at the last meeting. If you have any questions, please call. ba. • 9 J F", L J .• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM September 9, 1982 c. TO: City Manager and City Council FROM: Jim Robinson %p' Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Request for Title Change of Maintenance Supervisor to Maintenance Superintendent The Community Development Department has requested a title change for the position of Maintenance Supervisor to Maintenance Superintendent. This position currently directs the field operations of the Engineering Division for street, drainage, park and other public works maintenance operations. The requested title change more accurately reflects the current responsi- bilities of this mid - management position and is comparable to Maintenance Superintendent positions in other cities. The request is simply for a title change and does not include a change in the current salary range for this position. Staff would recommend approval of the title change of Maintenance Supervisor to Maintenance Superintendent. JR:ba j vaa a yr a�.vr,.uv �,�vnuava,vn MEMORANDUM DATE: May 18, 1982 TO: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager FROM: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Maintenance Supervisor Title Change c., U le ^ This is to confirm our earlier discussion that I believe a Title change from Maintenance Supervisor to Maintenance Superintendent is in order and subnit the following to you for your consideration. I have found through my associations with SSMA (Street Superintendent 8 Maintenance Association) that positions in other cities with responsibilities similar to that of the Maintenance Supervisor bear the title of Maintenance Superintendent. Although our maintenance staff is somewhat smaller than most I feel that our supervisors responsibilities have the same capacity as that of the superin- tendents. In other words, in addition to the supervisor being responsible for equipment maintenance, material and equipment acquisition, parks, parkways and streets maintenance personnel he is also responsible for parkway maintenance annual contract preparation and administration, annual sweeping contract preparations and administration and beginning July of this year the annual pavement repair contract preparation and administration. Prior to the addition of the last item, the title change may have been question- able, however, this new duty has added significantly more responsibility. This past year, the first year for this contract, administration was handled by the Public Works Inspectors and myself due mainly to the workload in inspection, the newness of the concept, and the additional workload of Carnleian landscape to the supervisor. This coming year the inspectors workload will not allow for the administration of the pavement contract, the landscape project will be completed, and the pavement contract was found to be quite successful and should be handled as a maintenance function. This request is for a Title change only not a promotion or new position. Existing compensation appears to be appropriate. If further clarifiaction is required, please advise. MP:bc cc: Lloyd Hubbs �c • • 0 • 0 STAFF REPORT DATE: September 15, 1982 TO: Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 81 -04 - WILSON - A change of zone from R -1- 20,000 (Single Family Residential - 20,000 Sq. Ft. Lot Minimum) to R -1- 10,000 (Single Family Residential - 10,000 Sq. Ft. Lot Minimum) for 6.9 acres of land located on Banyan Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue 201- 251 -63 and 64. Related File: Tentative Tract 10076 BACKGROUND The Planning Commission, after reviewing the proposal and conducting a public hearing on August 11, 1982 adopted Resolution 82 -87 recommending adoption of the above- described zone change and issuance of a Negative Declaration. In conjunction with this zone change is Tentative Tract 10076, a residential subdivision of 19 lots. The Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract map and related conditions of approval at their August 25, 1982 meeting. Approval of Tentative Tract 10076 is contingent upon adoption of this zone change by the City Council. Attached is a copy of the August 11, which fully describes the Zone Change with the zone change, two actions are Declaration by Minute action, and (2) adoption of the attached Ordinance. 1982 Planning Commission Staff Report request. If the City Council concurs required; (1) adoption of a Negative approval of the zone change through CORRESPONDENCE: A notice has been placed in The Daily Report newspaper a vert5is i`g cFis as a public hearing and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence directly related to the zone change has been received. Ci Zone Change 81 -04 /Nilson September 15, 1982 Page 2 L RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the _. Ordinance approving Zone Change 81 -04 and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully 6ubmitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:CJ:jr Attachments: Proposed Ordinance Planning Commission Resolution 82 -78 Planning Commission Staff Report of August 11, 1982 r1 U • RESOLUTION NO. 82 -78 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 81 -04 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -1- 20,000 TO R- 1- 10,000 FOR 6.9 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APN 201 - 251 -63 AND 64 WHEREAS, on the 24th day of October, 1981, an aoplication filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of August, 1982, the Planning Co:amissicn held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and • 2. That the proposed zone change would not have signifi- cant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and n 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on August 11, 1982. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 11th day of August, 1982, Zone Change No. 81 -04. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 81 -04. 1. I Resolution No. Page 2 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and re- • lated material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Lary I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of August, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMIISSIONERS: Rempel, Stout, McNiel, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Barker ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None h rJ • 9 c��-.,,� STAFF REPORT �Q '_°'; DATE: August 11, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 81 -04 - WILS4'1 - A change of zone from R -1- 20,000 Single Family Residential - 20,000 square foot lot minimum) to R- 1- 10,000 (Single Family Residential - 10,000 square foot lot minimum) for 6.9 acres of land located south of Banyan Street, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201 - 251 -63 8 64, Related File: Tentative Tract 10076 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: This request for the change of zone is in conjunction with the subdivision of 19 single family lots on 6.9 acres of landsouth of Banyan Street, east of Archibald Avenue (Exhibit "A "). The development project consists of Tentative Tract Map 10076, which is also on the agenda for your review and consideration. A description of the project is provided in the Tract Map Staff Report. Zoning on the subject property is currently R -1- 20,000. Exhibit "C" illustrates that surrounding property to the east is zoned R -1 -8500, to the south R -1- 15,000, and to the west and north R- 1- 20.000. The General Plan shows a future elementary school site on the subject property. A letter from the Alta Loma School District states that they have no current plans to purchase the land. Property surrounding the site south of Banyan is designated Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). The proposed density of Tentative Tract 10076 is 2.75 units per acre. ANALYSIS: Banyan Avenue is the approximate dividing line in Alta Loma between one -half acre zoning on the north and smaller lots to the south. The General Plan Land Use Map indicates this by desig- natinq property north of Banyan Very Low Density (Less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and property south of Banyan Low Density (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). ITEM C Zone Change 81 -04 /Wilson Planning Commission Agenda August 11, 1982 Page 2 Considering the lot size of the tracts to the east (7200 -8500 scuare feet) and zoning to the south (R- 1- 12,000 and R -1- 15,000) plus 'fie vacant lot to the north, this zone charge will not adversely affe:t surrounding property. In addition, a similar zone change from R- 1- 20,000 to R -1- 10,000 was approved in 1980 for property at the southeast corner of Banyan and Amethyst, in connection with a resi- dential subdivision of 30 lots on 10 acres of land. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the Applicant, is provided for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and has found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this zone change. If the Commission concurs with such findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. • FACTS FOR FINDING: The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommoda Ce the proposed lot size. The change of zone is con- sistent with the General Plan and the corresponding Tract Map has • a density within the range allowed. The approval of this zone change will not create adverse impacts on surrounding properties. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Dart newspaper, and 33 property owners within 300 feet of the subject property have been notified. To date, no correspondence directly related to the zone change has been received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission con- sider a 1 and elements relative to this project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the findings, then adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract 10076 Exhibit "C" - Zoning and General Plan Designations • Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval c� tl - ,,,���.e�'�© © C9edvD'�1y�j" 4TU2AL ATUR =S ':ono '� .,, 1 ..r � c✓ r _ %w,_ *'ate' u �$'� tow o- ♦,rr �, u —H�,aw 1.4 D. 1/4C fop P >awuu •uu ..•u r BOOK .rJ © O� "\ y D a 1/ \ -- 4 V y� ? 4 c . •. I.y' � Q.iV ���Y 4�' u - • s NORTH CITY OF ITrN1: RA- CI-IO CU�1NI0\C,:k PLANNING DIVISION GXHIMT TENTATIVE' TRACT N° 1 0076 F, 1� 9 47-�ll JT j ROILS -17 L NORTH cin, ()i,, ITEM: 4,c 94 al I t : k Nc 110 C uc, kN l(AGf TITLE: PL.kNNING 1)1\'[Sl()N! GXIIIBIT 8 SCALE: Wr-- � ZONING K+7Z-r 1 SITE _7 L' L F P-1 7-0 -7 • q, .3 .. ... .. GENERAL PLAN J k: jL'_jtLJ Hillside EJ- 7�/__ LAD rH.2,, U .0 i[C C h af f ey College r---7 crry or • RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING 1)1\'ISIO,*Nl ........... NORTH ITE 1: L'�CPF e_4AAt4& j�31. TITLE: z_c*jiWo -? &p4j. PI API LAHINT: e— sc;\I,r,! 0.-T: CITY OF RATCHO CUCAMONGA • INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Enviromental Assessment Review Fee: $60.00 For all projects recuiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than an (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The committee will make one c£ three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental —pact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or • 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the an giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: T?6�-- (n, ^7G. APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO IiE CONTACTED CONCERIZING THIS PROJECT: _) In • \!r l' C n N G l kl' 1Z L!;r \',•_ =E', LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Tai �V ��`1 �— G-;O� =. /,.c i -T.• �i. � ��,.r, LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGEENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 clj�,- 0 PROJECT DESCRT_PTTON • DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: )lam l•T• ti:(: •1.r n1 {1 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EY.IS^i::G AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: DESCRIBE THE EWIRON?'. "TAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFO RI lATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCE]IIC ASPECTS, CLE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, ANT THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EY.ISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): \�hGA -AI "• /y i_�.�i o�� rr, �.`! ^'"lam Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series' of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? I- 2 ' WILL THIS PTZOJ�CT: YES NO • X1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial chance in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? )( 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? Y 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or exr,losives? Explanation of any YES answers above: • I6l P'J ^T ?.i.T: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present-the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the, best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee.. Date e :',) / y? Signature !�/��� //1- /?L'�!� • Title �l %9 71 The fcllo•in.c; infc. cation shculd be nra✓,'ticd to the ctv o! 7z -_ijc aza PlLnn:nc D-'%.4Lnn in, order 10 aid in assessing the ability c t, scl-o0l district to acc==dal te the proposed residential NaMC Of Developer and Tentative Tract NO.: Specllic Louat_On of Project: I PH:I= 3 P" Fs: 9 family Units: -e2� of r nu 1 t 4 e family =its: 3• Late proposed to beer, ccnstrccticn: rarlics, Cate of and i of Tentative pr;ce I 0 0 • ORDINANCE NO. * AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 251 -63 & 64, LOCATED SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM R- 1- 20,000 TO R -1- 10,000 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly: Approximately 6.9 acres of land located south of Banyan Street, east of Archibald Avenue from R- 1- 20,000 (Single Family Residential - 20,000 square foot lot minimum) to R -1- 10,000 (Single Family Residential - 10,000 square foot lot minimum). SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • E CITY OF RA\CHO CUCAiiIO \C.> SAYE REPORT DATE: September 15, 1982 TO: Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner CII L� O 1977 SUBJECT: PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California establishing public notification procedures for Planning Conmission public hear.ncs. SUMMARY: Per Planning Commission direction, staff has prepared an Ordinance for Council consideration that would adopt notification procedures for Planning Commission public hearing items. These procedures would require the posting of notices on the project site at the time of filing and prior to the public hearing, and direct mailing of notices to property owners within 300' of the subject project site prior to the public hearing. A copy of the proposed Ordinance, the Commission Staff Report of 6/23/82, and minutes are attached for your review. The Planning Commission has recommended adoption of the ordinance. Council adoption will require two actions: (1) a nation to adopt the attached Ordinance; and, (2) a motion to approve the attached Resolution to adjust the fee schedule. BACKGROUND: The proposed notification procedures are intended to expand our current procedures in order to encourage greater public participation in the review process. Posting notices on the project site will notify residents affected by the project beyond the 300 foot direct mailing radius. Further, posting at the time of filing encourages public input during the early stages of the review process when it can have the greatest impact. In addition, the Planning Commission recommended adjusting the fee schedule to compensate for the additional costs for notification. The figures in the attached Resolution to amend the fee schedule represent an increase of $21 per item. A breakdown of this increase is as follows: Printed Notices (3 @ 5.62 ea.) . $ .168 24" Stakes (3 @ 302 ea.) .90 Typing (Clerk Typist @ $5.48 hr. - 10 Min.) . . . . .90 Assembling (Asst. Planner @ $9.70 hr. - 15 min) . . . . . 2.42 Posting (Asst. Planner @ $9.70 hr. - 30 Min) . . . . . . 4.80 Mileage (Average 4 Mi. @ 302 ea.) . . . . . . . . . . . 1.20 Tru-W X 2 R-0776- City Council Staff Report Public Notification Procedures September 15, 1982 Page 2 • RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review and consider all material and input regarding this item. The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached Ordinance and Resolution. Respectfully s Witted, i JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:DC:jr Attachments: June 23, 1982 Staff Report June 30, 1982 Memorandum Minutes of June 23, 1982 Planning Commission Meeting Ordinance Resolution • • 7;r 0 10 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCr.ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 23, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES ABSTRACT: The City Planning staff has prepared a report, per the P and ping - Commission's direction, on alternatives for expanding our Public notification procedures. This report presents a discussion of the various issues and options concerning notification of sur- rounding residents. ANALYSIS: The California Government Code requires notification of puDlic hearings involving approval of tentative maps, zone changes, CUPS, or variances. Said notice, in conjunction with newspaper ad- vertisement, must be given by direct mailing, posting or any other appropriate means. There are several issues regarding notification procedures. I. Uhen should residents be given notice of pending projects? There are two logical times for notification: (1) at the time the project is accepted as complete for filing, and (2) prior to the public hearing. An advantage of notifying residents at the time of filing is that it provides an opportunity for public input early in the review process. 2, !That projects should be noticed? All public hearing items are currently given notice prior to the public hearing. The issue is what projects should be noticed at the tine of filing. Potentially any public hearing item could have an impact on the surrounding area. It .could seem appropriate to notify residents concerning all public hearing items. _�1 ITE'I E G/ C) < - CL Z pj ABSTRACT: The City Planning staff has prepared a report, per the P and ping - Commission's direction, on alternatives for expanding our Public notification procedures. This report presents a discussion of the various issues and options concerning notification of sur- rounding residents. ANALYSIS: The California Government Code requires notification of puDlic hearings involving approval of tentative maps, zone changes, CUPS, or variances. Said notice, in conjunction with newspaper ad- vertisement, must be given by direct mailing, posting or any other appropriate means. There are several issues regarding notification procedures. I. Uhen should residents be given notice of pending projects? There are two logical times for notification: (1) at the time the project is accepted as complete for filing, and (2) prior to the public hearing. An advantage of notifying residents at the time of filing is that it provides an opportunity for public input early in the review process. 2, !That projects should be noticed? All public hearing items are currently given notice prior to the public hearing. The issue is what projects should be noticed at the tine of filing. Potentially any public hearing item could have an impact on the surrounding area. It .could seem appropriate to notify residents concerning all public hearing items. _�1 ITE'I E C < Public Noticing Procedures Planning Commission Agenda June 23, 1982 Page 2 3. How should projects be notified in addition to legal advertse- ment in the newspaper? Notice may be given by direct mailing, posting the subject orccarty or any other means deemed appropriate. Currently, all public - ing items are advertised in the newspaper and notices are :-aiie= to property owners within 300' ten (10) days prior to the meeting. The City has the authority to use other methods of notification. Posting the subject property at the time an application is filed, in addition to the current policy, would provide notice to homeowners at two aif- ferent times during the review process. 10 The Commission, as an alternative, can expand the notification procedure by posting and /or mailing notices at the time of filing in conjunction with current procedure of direct mailing and legal advertising prior to public hearings. RECC�'� ^ENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission review and consiaer all material and input regarding this item. Further, it is reccm- mended that the Planning Commission make a motion to continue the existing procedure as described above, or expand the notification procedures. G', �SONEZ ty /Planner RG:OC:jr • OFFICIAL v f � r - NOTICE OF PROJECT FILING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT An application has been filed on with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department for the following project(s): Anyone having concerns or questions on the project(s) is welcome to contact the City Planning Division at (714) 989 -1851, in writing, or by visiting the offices located at 9340 Baseline, Suite B, on or before Notices will be mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site at least ten days prior to any public hearing for this project(s). - DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE - OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on at the Lions Park Community Building, located at 9161 Baseline, to consider the following project(s): • Anyone having concerns or questions on the project(s) is welcome to contact the Cily Planning Division at (714) 989 -1851, in writing, or by visiting the offices located at 9340 Baseline, Suite B, on or befrre • Anyone wishing to comment on the project(s) is welcome to attend the public hearing or submit a letter to the Planning Division prior to the meeting. - DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE - 0 DIRECTOR'S REPORTS E. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report for the Commission. Commissioner Rempel stated that he felt a time limit should be placed an the notification signs for public input and that a statement should he included that there was a penalty for removal of signs from the site. Edward Hopson, Assistant Citv Attorney, stated that by law the only thing required is that a city publish the notification of public hearing in the newspaper. Mr. Gomez explained to the Commission that our current notification process for public hearing is that of advertising in the legal ad section of the newspaper and direct mailing of notices to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. • Jack Lam, Community Development Director, advised the Commission that additional rotification requirements would require an adjustment to the fee schedule because of the additional cost to the processing. • Commissioner Stout suggested that the word welcome on the proposed signs be replaced with the word encouraged as he would like to see the public encouraged to participate in the processing of projects. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Stout, unanimouslv carried, to direct staff to prepare an Ordinance for the City Council adopting the notification procedure of posting signs at the time of project filing and public hearing, to continue the process of direct mailing notices at toe time of public hearing to propertv owners within 300 feet of the subject property, and to adjust the fee schedule to compensate for the additional cost of processing. This draft Ordinance is to he brought back to the Commission for recommendation to the City Council. Planning Commission Minutes -5- June 23, 1982 -'=f • ORDINANCE NO. * AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California �oes ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Intent and Purpose: The City Council encourages public participation in the decision- making process, therefore, the intent and purpose of this Ordinance is to establish procedures for the notification of the general public regarding Planning Commission public hearing items. SECTION 2: Notification Procedures: The following public notification procedures are hereby established: (A) Notice of Filing: At such time as an application for a project, which requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission, is deemed complete for processing, the Community Development Director • shall cause notices to be posted conspicuously on the project site not more than 300' apart. Each notice shall have a general description of the project and a copy of the proposed Subdivision Map or Site Plan. Said notices shall have the following title in lettering not less than 1" in height: "NOTICE OF FILING" (B) Notice of Hearing: At least ten (10) days before the public hearing the Community Development Director shall cause notification of the time and place of the public hearing and a general project description in the following manner: (1) Notice shall be given by publication once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circuI inn within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (2) Notice shall be given by direct ,nailing to all property owners within 300' of the project site. (3) Notices shall be posted conspicuously on the project site not more than 300' apart. Each • notice shall have a general description of the project and a copy of the proposed Subdivision Map or Site Plan. Said notices shall have the following title and letter not less than 1" in height: Ordinance No. Page 2 "NOTICE OF HEARING" SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Teri shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circ.:lation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • • I RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2 AND 3 OF THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 79 -1, REESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES WHEREAS, the City Council desires to encourage public participation through providing additional public notification of projects; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to increase application fees to cover the cost of said noticing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that certain portions of Section 2, Planning Review Fees, of Council Resolution No. 79 -1 be amended as follows: 2.3 Conditional Use Permit ..........................$396 2.5 Planned Unit Development .......................$1272 2.7 Variance ............. ...........................$272 • 2.8 Zone Change .......... ...................$649 +32 /acre 2.9 General Plan Amendment .........................$1272 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that certain portions of Section 3, Subdivision and Parcel Map Fees, of Council Resolution No. 79 -1 be amended as follows: 3.1.1 Tentative Tract Filing Fee ............ $649 +32 /acre 3.1.2 Tentative Parcel Map ..........................$207 PASSES, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. r i e s, Mayor :• lJ 1] MEMORANDUM August 31, 1982 TO: Lauren Wasserman FROM: Harry Empty ^� J SUBJECT: Refuse Rate Increase The City met with Rancho Disposal and Yukon Disposal in an effort to clarify their desires relating to a rate adjustment. Over the course of our conversation I requested a justification report from their account- ants. Attached is what we received from Yukon. Rancho Disposal is yet to be heard from which is not like Ed Burr. We also discussed 9/15/82 as the Council meeting to discuss, approve, modify or reject the refuse companies' request for an adjustment. Frankly, a 6.61% increase for this utility service seems quite small when compared to the 30Z to 50% increases the gas and electric companies have been seeking lately. The last item that was discussed was a change in the month that refuse rate adjustments would be considered. Ed Burr recommends an effective date in July. This would coordinate with the County of San Bernardino and would also provide the City with excellent source information as to the data effecting rate adjustments. Based on the reduced amount of complaints, and the much improved service level being conducted by Rancho Disposal under its new ownership, it would be my guess that lettle resistance should appear. Of course, Council may not even grant an increase, or if they do, something less than the 6.61% Yukon ::as suggested. HJE /wa R O'N 1 PISPO.S41 ARVICE P.O. Box 1 • Alto Loma, California 91701 • Telephone 17141 987 -2410 August 24, 1982 Mr. Harry Empey City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Re: Request for Refuse Rate Increase. Dear Harry: . Yukon Disposal is requesting a rate increase of (6.61 %) effective as of October 1, 1982. The rates would go from the present of $6.05 to $6.45 per month. North of Banyon Street the rates would go from $6.75 to $7.20 per month. The senior citizens rate would then go from $5.05 to $5.40. Enclosed are figures that you have requested, showing our increased operating expenses. bec 11 Sincerely, r J AvAa ian tj Yukon Disposal Service Schedule of Operating Expenses Percentage of Cost Increases Advertising Amortization expense Bad Checks Depreciation Dues 6 subscriptions Dump Fees Employee welfare Equipment rental Gas s oil - trucks Insurance Interest Laundry - uniforms Licenses Office expense Outside Labor Professional services Rent Repairs 6 maint. - Equipment Repairs 6 maint. - Trucks Salaries Taxes - Highway Use Taxes - Real Property Taxes - Payroll Taxes - Personal Property Telephone Utilities Supplies Freight Total Operating Expenses Actual Projected % Increase % Increase 1981 over 1980 1982 over 1991 ( 59.50%) 210.171 -0- -0- ( 18.53 ) ( 15.16 ) 7.99 ( 10.00 ) 50.32 55.53 8.17 33.77 336.30 ( 91.06 ) ( 2.09 ) 226.30 4.94 13.53 .47 32.54 ( 10.78 ) ( 7.41 ) 46.87 ( 48.21 ) 150.35 ( 46.07 ) 25.48 ( 8.29 ) ( 28.18 ) ( 9.79 ) ( 11.77 ) 9.97 ( 12.36 ) ( 28.89 ) ( 52.32 ) 30.18 3.97 23.22 11.62 1.68 51.57 29.61 471.27 -0- 30.51 30.38 57.42 14.66 34.88 39.55 ( 11.19) 1.31 43.10 120.38 274.42 ( 65.84 ) 6159% 10.15% FENSTER & FENSTER - CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS - AN ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION IIAXCZO DISPOSAL II P.O. Box 956 • SERVICE, IMC. onga, CA 917 Phow (714) 987.77170 August 26, 1962 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 ATTENTION: Mr. Lauren Wasserman - City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the City council: Rancho Disposal makes application for an increase in the rate of charge for collection and disposal of solid waste from single dwellings inside the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Even though most costs have moderated recently we did experience a 16.7% disposal fee increase at county landfills on July 1, 1982 and have not passed this on to our customers as yet. For your information, the • county 1982 amended refuse rate adjustment computation, using the period 7/l/81- 3/31/82, calls for a 5.12% increase in rates on July 1, 1982. Attached is an analysis of costs and recommendations from our accounting firm. The accountant, using a 12 month period, is recommending a 6.9% ($.42) increase in our rate. Please consider and approve our request to increase residential rates $.40 per month (6.6 %) effective October 1, 1982 and institute city policy for future rate reviews according to county schedule starting July 1, 1983. Thanks for your consideration and co- operation. Please be aware of our continuing desire to provide the best possible service at the lowest cost to our customers. Respectfully, RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. • Edward Burr President M-1-1 sr r•icra ni.Wcto Atraai.ent I AUJiler /Control ter -R rtOrd.I Palle 1 of 3 191§3 RCIUSL RATE INDEX - VALLEY AREA IDiT RASC MARCH JUNE VINCE" COMPONENT YC enr INDEX SOURCE YEAR 1983 191§1 (STANCE • 61iaLaent F +u - Ilonu roil [uni rya alt .eel rod Ear i,. (ITS) Labor 3.% S+nl rary le rr ice (SIC 495) A.-,a E.hI.;LeA N-Ib1Y by !••run $9.10 f].)l ].]11 IMace 0 ...mr ly Car ninrA al Lobar Stwtiwticr. (S1.S) CUno.er Prime InAO (CPU (Un.djou.d) 14-01, labor ... is. (MLA), Ind 9i U.S. Cily Areu xe, All Urban Cnm awe ra, F,htith.d -11. ly by Rules. 1961 163.9 416.4 ( 7d6Z) Cool :fie of LaFnr st.ti.li,. Vehicle Pr odor rr Price Indu (PPS), Nnrnr hoduor /ricer and PRICE Inde_r 196] 369.1 }63.3 3.6 )I IePluarn[ Ill T,, Tr u.h. (NJe 1411031. Pull uLed Monlhu PPS, 1.ea-1 V.npoo Maebfinery MLR 1967 101.5 296.6 5.30% 3 rnd E U i nt ICUde 11 -4) 1/4 IAAORI S+ae a Labor ab... EIL - -- 6 9.10 $1.11 1.171 31X, CPI (Ilodj.) V.S. City M.inten..e. 133 Re R., All Urban Conueers MT.R 1973 131.9 111.4 1.112 3/4 PARTS. A21. Part. b 6i!t- )SI: IF1, Cener.I Iorpoe L CIO MIA Machinery nA LquiPent 1961 301.5 366.6 5.20I Aloss Increo.e n Peer Board Minster and V Cop I... SL - v -t by Artiun of the Cnnntr .....dw ! 1.50 $3.00 16.67I hoard of 9uyery ianu Rio 11"1.- nl 32 ". i.bnowJ ST-1.1.1 MIA 1967 104.5 195.4 1.OBX 1 PrnJUrt+ l('ode III -1) All Other [Y1, Lur Any LS -Lon( leach (PI oe[eiled Retort, (Mme 3) 191 Ansbai w, (IlnaAjN O.II, All Iaabl uFe.1 Moot M1l� b63 196] 396.6 36].9 6.9LI Ihbrn Co n+u fill It.nn RI.S. 100% MORE 1: Salary nlra . e for LFnury of earh yell. All other indeaea villa the a c.,Unn of damp I... .r. for March of each Year. Board y,PC.aed in fie.... in dairy fee. eftectiVe JULY In are Atom 10 May and perceat Age inrfeno are fro. Jnly- Jame fir each MITE h All other c [.gory Inrinde, balance at a dollar In c .nl ..heed sap ... ea wthis vrbn sod pane id. A re tom fir inru rnenr. parriam will 4e ad jn aeJ by 75Z of [Fe pe.cent nla.nRr, I,, Indna. OrerL..d Incl a.he. [ n All ia. neludin9 Bea wl Il.bil(ty, fire, tr..% A...... eat.nJeA c nM bad o pley.. Ann, ren nn Property' trrtA lic nut rnd ,air.! rot and per el property rate.) me dial rnd lit•] t W.,haee -.1 other ililieai ..,lore. on Hot.., say e.. ....1, -.11 Ren ul l.,J repair. .ad•a.lnlenwnu eap.m ul aaS n.er hillin, ni•rnre; nfncr upplieq pnara"; trade w i.l)oil doe, .nd nab.tr 1pl lUUl Wva rtl.i nRl r.pliqu relir..enl or profit asset., cenlrihnlinnq and .I.c.11.ae..nr other ta,ao... ROME 3: At the rpnut Of that nfoer InAnrtfy, the I..,d .pprornl • rt,.a,F In the rat ... rat. Intrr... Ivp I• -at l inn J.ta Ira). UrSnl ... r lu So .)n Iy tat, ah IRA eoAl.. to.p.nie. to {nor e... ..tat. In . .... Wr..111, W., be Joe ....... for rnrb • Cmhnly fi.enl par. The 19113 Nelson Into InAr., therelnr e, nd npan ady . nine month p-lud, Marla 31, IIA3. All ..b-,aerr ..m...I rare I....... e talc ulu ml II Ind ... Ie 11'. r fell year's .1.1y I, 1981 ILrnnRF in•I .. Pereen I.,. c1§. ^R•v • I raw APr it I.t to Mrrcb ]1.[. J Management Services Division Office of the Audicor /Controller-Recorder • 1982 REFUSE RATE ADDUSTI -NT COMPUTA'T'ION Attachment 2 • 0 ,G Percent Increase Vallev Mountain 6 'Desert Index 7/1/81- 3/31/82 Weight Amount Heizit A=unt Average Hourly Earnings 7.37 0.3300 2.4321 0.3325 2.4505 Gasoline (7.36) 0.0900 (0.6624) 0.1!00 (0.8096) Motor Trucks 2.63 0.0650 0.1710 0.0700 0.184: General Purpose Machinery and Equipment 5.20 0.1325 0.6890 0.1431 0.7441 Automotive ?arts and Equipment 3.37 0.0225 0.0758 0.0244 0.0822 Dump Fees 16.67 0.0500 0.8335 -0- -0- Fabricated Structural Metal Products 3.08 0.0200 0.0616 0.0200 0.0616 CPI, L.A., Long Beach, Anaheim, All Items 5.24 0.2900 1.3196 0 .3000 143720 TOTAL 1.0000 5.1202 1.000 4.2849 Unadjusted Race Increase 5.122 4.28 • 0 ,G MARSHALL A. PETERS AN ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION MINN. 1A)A ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE 206 MEW q • C11111ND NELN OCIM Of a MARINA DEL ELY, CANT -0RNIA 90191 GLIlORNIA sIXNT q (2131421-1400 CEMEIED NELIC ACCOUNTANn August 16, 1982 BOARD OF DIRECTORS RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. Gentlemen: Pursuant to your Instructions, we have complied certain cost of doing business for Rancho Disposal Service, Inc. Our study consisted of comparing certain operating expenses for 12 months ending May 31, 1983, as projected with 12 months ended May 31, 1982 historical expenses. Following Is the comparison: Increase of 2.9 points reflected as a percentage of 1982 42.3 points is 6.95. NOTF: The above Indexes were computed by calculating the percentages of the above operating expenses to revenues. C<, • • 1982 1983 Index Index Salaries, excluding management salaries 18.2 21.9 Equipment operating expenses, primarily Fuel, lubricants d maintenance 14.2 14.7 Dumping fees --k.5- 8.6 TOTALS ,_42.,3 _ 45.2 An analysis of the changes of the Indexes is as follows: 1983 Projected 45.2 1982 Historical 92.3 INCREASE 2.9 Increase of 2.9 points reflected as a percentage of 1982 42.3 points is 6.95. NOTF: The above Indexes were computed by calculating the percentages of the above operating expenses to revenues. C<, • • RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. pg. 2 8/16/82 Our study was based upon the fInancIal data of the company's oper at Ing statements and upon certain cost data furnished by management. Projected costs furnished by management were generally based upon the company's costs for the twelve months ended May 31,1982, and adjusted for the Industry's recent experience of the effects of Infla4lon. Because this study Is based partially upon the company's unaudited operating costs and have been projected to reflect Inflationary Increases, so as to reflect future costs, we are not In a position to render an Accountant's opinion on It, as promulgated by Rule 56 of the California State Board of Accountancy. Sincerely, Marshall A. Peters Certified Public Accountant /L Recently the Sheriff's Office was successful in upgrading 20 positions throughout the Sheriff's Office to a Senior Deputy classification effective January, 1983. This classification is new and affords the Sheriff's Office tremendous flexibility in the assignment of manpower. In gaining these new classifications, the contract cities were not considered. I have been instructed by Undersherif£ Tidwell to negotiate with the City, the number of Senior Deputy positions needed. The Senior Deputy position has long been overdue, not only for this Station, but the entire Sheriff's Office. Although the • position is of a supervisorial nature, the City does not lose a patrolman for a "desk jockey." The City gains an immediate field working supervisor (in the absence of the Watch Commander), while still maintaining the same number of field officers on patrol. The evaluation of Rancho needs indicate that three positions need to be upgraded. The officers would be compensated at the same rate as Detectives and a slight increase to our con- tract cost would result. Cost Breakdown: $25,891.20 (Deputy Salary) + 10.24% (Percent Increase) _ $2,651.00 per year $2,651.00 ; 2 (six months) _ $1,325.00 per six months $1,325.00 x 3 positions = $3,977.00 TOTAL CONTRACT INCREASE . . . . . $3,977.00 Justification: The purpose in requesting three Senior Deputies is to place one on each shift throughout the day. Obviously, from time to time, there will be no Senior Deputy on shift due to illness, vacation, training, schools, days off, etcetera. However, on those occa- sions the shift schedule will ensure that a regular Watch Command- er will be on duty. 12-1367000 F6v, 1171 INTER- OFFICE MEMO -- DATE August 26, 1982 • FR0M Thomas Wickum, Captain PHONE ',,�s Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station /•�jx� '�✓ TO Lauren Wasserman, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT Creation of Senior Deputy Position Recently the Sheriff's Office was successful in upgrading 20 positions throughout the Sheriff's Office to a Senior Deputy classification effective January, 1983. This classification is new and affords the Sheriff's Office tremendous flexibility in the assignment of manpower. In gaining these new classifications, the contract cities were not considered. I have been instructed by Undersherif£ Tidwell to negotiate with the City, the number of Senior Deputy positions needed. The Senior Deputy position has long been overdue, not only for this Station, but the entire Sheriff's Office. Although the • position is of a supervisorial nature, the City does not lose a patrolman for a "desk jockey." The City gains an immediate field working supervisor (in the absence of the Watch Commander), while still maintaining the same number of field officers on patrol. The evaluation of Rancho needs indicate that three positions need to be upgraded. The officers would be compensated at the same rate as Detectives and a slight increase to our con- tract cost would result. Cost Breakdown: $25,891.20 (Deputy Salary) + 10.24% (Percent Increase) _ $2,651.00 per year $2,651.00 ; 2 (six months) _ $1,325.00 per six months $1,325.00 x 3 positions = $3,977.00 TOTAL CONTRACT INCREASE . . . . . $3,977.00 Justification: The purpose in requesting three Senior Deputies is to place one on each shift throughout the day. Obviously, from time to time, there will be no Senior Deputy on shift due to illness, vacation, training, schools, days off, etcetera. However, on those occa- sions the shift schedule will ensure that a regular Watch Command- er will be on duty. 12-1367000 F6v, 1171 Memo to Lauren Wasserman, City Manager August 26, 1982 Page Two It should be pointed out that a Senior Deputy position for each of • the three shifts per day is in no way an attempt to fatten the administration or lessen the duties and responsibilities of the station Watch Commander on duty. The Senior Deputy will, at times, supplement the duty Watch Commander on those occasions when both are on duty at the same time. The primary reason for the creation of this position was not to supplement the Watch Commander's posi- tion, but to augment the supervision of the station in the absence of a Watch Commander and to be utilized as a training officer. This station presently has six sergeants. Two of the sergeants are removed from the patrol capacity. One directly supervises the station detectives and the other supervises the Record Bureau personnel, as well as being responsible for the grants, traffic enforcement and the traffic and criminal statistics. The remain- ing four sergeants are assigned to patrol. There is one for each of the three shifts and the remaining one is for relief. It is quite obvious that when a sergeant is removed from patrol for any given period of time, coupled with vacations, days off, training, illnesses, etcetera, the three remaining sergeants cannot be assigned to supervise all shifts. A Senior Deputy would cover these gaps if one were to be assigned to each of the three shifts each day. These positions are not additions, but rather upgrading of present personnel at a 10 percent salary increase. • 1. Training a. The Senior Deputy will be the field training officer for all Academy deputies routinely assigned to this station for periods of three months at a time and will act as a liaison between this station and the Academy Staff. The Senior Deputy will also be responsible for train- ing all newly assigned deputy personnel transferring to the Rancho Cucamonga Substation for field assign- ment. This position will also be utilized to assist the Watch Commander in on -going field training of station personnel. Supervision The Senior Deputy will serve as an alternate super- visor and coordinator at major traffic accident and crime scene investigations when the shift (watch) commander is called away or unavailable on other emergencies requiring his immediate presence. Presently when the Watch Commander is on vacation, • sick, etcetera the responsibility for the watch is relinquished to the most senior deputy on shift. The field deputy then has the added burden of Memo to Lauren Wasserman, City Manager August 26, 1982 Page Three • supervising and coordinating the entire shift (with the authority, but without the rank and hampered by peer pressurel as well as perform- ing his regular patrol duties. The addition of the Senior Deputy position would alleviate this on- going problem. Flexibility a. The rank of detective (which ultimately will be phased out) and that of Senior Deputy are one in the same. This allows for lateral movement from a patrol function to investigations without pro- motion or demotion, which is what is required at present without the position of a Senior Deputy. 4. Morale 1�T c 0 a. As indicated previously, the lateral movement of a Senior Deputy from patrol to investigations is now available. This lateral movement is a great morale booster for those deputies about to be promoted, affording them the opportunity of work- ing in uniform or plain clothes investigations as a detective. As time goes on, a senior patrolman may elect to move from plain clothes to uniform or vice versa. This is not only a morale factor for the individual, but provides a broader base of experience for the deputies. The former plain clothesman is now charges with training. The lateral movement of the Senior Deputy from patrol to investigations will also provide new insight to plainclothesmen in their overall manner of conducting field contact and investigations. n 0 0 LJ CITY OF RA \CIAO CUCG ,A10 \G.\ STAFF REPORT DATE: September 15, 1982 TO: Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO THE BUDGET OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND AOV NI, OF MONIES TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH BACKGROUND: Recent revisions in the tax increment projection as a result of the County Auditor's completion of tax estimates show the Rancho Redevelopment Agency will receive more than originally estimated. As a result, revisions to the Redevelopment Agency budget will be necessary. Attached to this report is a synopsis of the projected budget for 1982 -83 including operational and capital expenditures and revenue estimates by source. A complete discussion of this budget change is included in the Staff Report to the Redevelopment Agency. It will be necessary for the City Council to act on two things: (1) in order for the Agency to receive the full tax increment entitled to the City, it will be necessary for the Agency to establish a level of debt to the full amount of the projected tax increment. This requires an advance by the City to the Redevelopment Agency of $600,000. Attached is a Resolution causing advance to be made in order to establish the debt. Money from the Agency will be used to pay back the advance. (2) City Council must review and adopt the revised budget as proposed by the Redevelopment Agency. Included with the report to the Redevelopment Agency is a revised budget. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution advancing to the Redevelopment Agency appropriate funds and adopt the revised 'budget for the Redevelopment Agency for the fiscal year 1982 -83. Respectfully �bmitt d, Jack Lam, AICP Director of Community Developnent JL:TJB:jr Attachments: Resolution of Approval • RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1982 -1983 AND LOANING FUNDS TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, the City Council, in accordance with the provisions of the California Community Redevelopment Law, has created a Community Redevelopment Agency Administrative Fund for the purpose of accounting for administrative expenses of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and funds advanced therefore by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to loan funds to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Reserve Funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That $600,000 is hereby appropriated from • Reserves to the Community Redevelopment Agency Administrative Fund for administrative costs as they apply to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency in accordance with that Agency's approved budget for Fiscal Year 1982 -1983. SECTION 2: That the interest on the loan is to be paid to the General Fund at an amount equivalent to whatever interest can be earned by investment of all or a portion thereof the $600,000. SECTION 3: That the budget of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency for Fiscal Year 1982 -1983, as attached to this Resolution, is hereby approved in the following amounts: ACTIVITY FUND ACTIVITY APPROPRIATION Community Redevelopment Agency Administrative Fund Administration $600,000 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982. AYES: is NOES: ABSENT: • 0 9 MEMORANDUM F DATE: September 15, 1982 1'0: City Council - City Manager FROM: harry Empey, Finance Director SUBJECT: Financial System Computer Package Attached is a proposal for a micro computer system for the City financial needs. Ths proposal is self explanatory as to the system, the only thing it doesn't cover are the reasons why. CURRENT PROBLEMS- One thing that has not been achieved is a financial system that is integrated. We have found that sharing a system with other agencies does not allow for specific City needs and requirements being met. Unless all the other agencies concur with our particular wishes they will not and do not come about. In essence, we are at the mercy of the majority. Another problem is that our current system does not allow for an ef- fective use of accounts payable and purchase orders. This leaves our General Ledger only half complete with revenues being the only data that is being reported and recorded correctly. Because of these inadequacies we have refused to implement the entire system.. The result of this is that we use two different companies for data processing service, neither, of course, integrates with the ether. Until now this has not been a prohl.em as our broke are maintained by hand and have been very well done, as our auditors will and have aLLeeLud to. Now, new programs are being added such as the Redevelopment Agency, Assessment Districts (industrial, landscape) and special grants. All require different and additional reporting requirements. The Redevelopment Agency, Industrial Assessment District and the Commun- ity Development Block Crant all have their own checking account and set of hooks for balancing purposes. These added burdens make our bookkeeping by hand very prohibitive, in fact, several hours of over - tine have already been donated by the accounting staff to keep the n ' page 2 books up to date. SOLUTION The attached proposal appears to satisfy our requirements and needs through budget preparation. This system will eliminate the need to have two different data processing companies preparing our payroll checks and payables warrants. The system will allow us to eliminate our bookkeeping procedures by hand. As with anything new, the concern for hack up and ongoing maintenance service comes to the forefront. The MSI proposal seems to reflect this weakness. As much as the proposal means to the Finance Depart- ment, the concept of developing an in house system of some kind is the key factor. COST S FD9DING- The proposal calls for a purchase price of $60,000. Our current costs for data processing run $30,000 to $35,000 per year plus $2,000 to $4,000 per year for supplies, i.e. check stock, warrant stock, mis- cellaneous report runs. These current annual costs can be reduced significantly to around $7,500 to $10,000 per year maybe less, de- pending on supplies consumed. Essentially, the system could pay for itself in two years. • Paying for the system could be financed by the Industrial Assessment District (in part) inasmuch as special requirements, a separate checking account and a complete set of books are necessary to account for the transactions within the district. Also, the Redevelopment Agency should share in the cost as it is a separate entity unto itself, removed from interaction financially with the City, but still requires a separate set of books and special reporting requirements must be met annually to the County and the State. Lastly funding should be shared by the General Fund Reserves. RECO ?DtENDATIO;: - It is recommended that City Council approve at least the concept, and authorize funding ment District and the General Fund Reserves. fundin; by the Redevelopment Agency when the Board at its next meeting. MSE /wa �i i the attached proposal, or from the Industrial Assess - Also to consider shared Council sits as the Agency Pi E ORDINANCE `A. 78 AS ORDC:. \:CE OF THE f.ITY COC;:CIL OF TINE F,1 T5' OF RANCHO CL'CAHONLA, 01.I FORK LA, RFC.T LAT INC TIIE STnRWF., USE k:D SALE OF SAFE. AND SANE FIREWORKS WITHIN THE CITY nF W;CHO CUCAMONGA. r The City Council of [hi City of Rancho Cucamonga, Californ Lr, . dues ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Ordinance 25, approved and adopted the loth day of May, 1978, is hereby retooled. SECTION 2: INTENT AND PURPOSE It is the intent of this ordinance to safeguard life or limb, health, property and public welfare by r,.l.lin, and con,alling he stneiee, sale, us. or discharge of safe and sane fireworks within the Cie,, of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION D; FIREWORKS DEFINED A. Dangerous Fireworks are those defined in Section 115OS of the Health and Safety Code of the Scale of California, and may not be discharged in the City of Rancho Cucamonga at any time. B. Safe and mane firewrks are those defined in Section • 12504 of the Health and Safety Code of the Stare of California. Safe and sane fireworks may be discharged within the City of Cucamonga during the period I Rancho beginn in, at 12;00 n no the 28th day of June and ending at 12:00 no n the 6th day of Only of the same calendar Yen r. SECTION 4: SALE OF SAFE AND WIE FIREWORKS A. The sale of safe and sane fireworks shall only be pernilled In c rciaidistricts of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is sab]e,t to all applicable stare laws and regulations and all conditions of this ordinance. U. No person or permittee shall sell any safe and same firewrks to a minor under the age of L,,se. (16) unless sold minor is accompanied by his /her parents) or guard l an(s). C. The sale of safe and sane firewrks shall not begin before 12:n0 noon on the 28th dev of June and shall not continue after 12:01 a.m. on the 5th day of July of the sum, r.lend., veer. SEr.T1na 5: LICENSES, PERMITS AND PRERF.OUISITFS FOR SALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIMMAKS A. No person 'ball offer for sAe nr sell It retail any L safe ends a fircwnrka in said city wlrhoul first having applied for and secured a business limense from said eity and then applied for oud s cured a permit from the Foothill Fire District and an electrical permit for any included eleetrieil wtring from the Building Official. • ordin.,ncc NI. ve ?", 1 • R. E." mplicatioh f, rile sale of s oa fir,. n ,ha I he n ompn,d by tech' (J) : plor , and shall set forth the proposed location of s.,ld satunaind ,a ne rir,orks stands. C. All Polity 'ad llc"o'v ,bail expir,. at 12:;11 -a-'- the 5th dnv of Ju1r. An. permit or license hall be suhpw: to s • order of the 'it, Chief at E•.11diug Official if he or his duly .u¢Fn r:c a representattye has determined chat anv Permi,,1 h.., failed to comply y the terms c and prow is inn, of thin ord ins nth or ,nY cord tcions of the permit. D. Temporary Sales Tax Permit Required. (L1 D[gnn iza t!ona licensed for the se11ine n and ,are fireworks at, reired to obtain a enpu n ry qu sale,, cax per— itrom the retionil offtee of the Stnte Beard of EGn.Iltxation. E. Display of Business License, Sales Tax Permit, Fire District Permit Ind California Sorze Fire Marshal Retail Fireworks License. (1) The License to sell fireworks, the temporary sales tax permit, the Foothill Fire District putt and the California State Fire Marshal's Retail Fireworks License shall be displayed in a prominent place in the fireworks ,,and. F. Nritaen pdrmisaicn of the owner of record nr lessee of the property of which the safe and sane flrevorks stand is to be located shall accompany the application. • SECTt(a; 6: lNSURANCE REQUIRED A. Applicant shall also provide the following at the time Of permit appifcation: (1) Evidence of public liability insurance indicating; (a) Name and address of app ltcant as tnsnred or beldnr, of certificate of insurance issued in connection with a policy carried by a supplier of are and sane it rework,: (b) Th.0 applicant, Cicv of Rancho Cupzmonga, and Feochill Fire protection District are insureds espac cg llabillev amainµ out of operations end /or bectvitiea conducted at the location described herein, or in toolonccien with the insured to whom thto police is issued, anmed d /or sale o r I,, of plodutts pnrcM1nsed from said named ir,uted; (c) P,I.ol of r a e L 12:01 I.m., .lane 28, er ea:'1ter,m 12YOla.m.. July 15, or later; (d) Name and address of incur once company; (e) Ltmits of liabiitty of not loss than 5100,000/ I 530O.OaO pnblie liability and 550,000 property L damage insuranen: (f) Type: of Insa run re as l) General liability feel udlot p,,ei,es/ n pn nit t.ns li.n,i li ty. • Ord lnanve No, 28 Pugs ] 2) Contra "tun'' linhllity sneclfltally indcmn:ficnalan o .,unto vithr 111, lair of Ran , ho Curnnougnnnd [he Fonthlll Fire Prntrc[ inn liv[rict. 8) Prndncte liability inclwlin4 .•ocplet.d c statism liaFil i[v. Lu .I!i.n of prnpnaud operation a. "safe .,ed I Lun e fireworks stand" (exec[ dnseription of loco t Lou) (h) nett not less than thirty 00) days written t.H.Iliou o vter/al chars. print notice of c r In c rage be provided to he City of Peecho Cucamonga and the Fnntbtll Fire District aM /or ath addl[ tonal insured Indicated in be certificate of insurance. SECTION ]: OPERATION OF STAND A. Staffing (1) No person below [be age of eighteen (18) years shall, at a n e time, be or be permitted inside said stand or to assist in the handling or sale of a.fe and all fireworks. B. Location (1) All retail sales of safe and < e fireworks shall be pe "miffed only from within a temporary safe and • ..me fireworks stand. Sales it. any other building or structure are hereby prohibited. (2) No safe and are fireworks stand shall be letated within twenty-five fee[ (25') of env other building, nor within twenty -five feet (25') or any ignition whl"h could light or discharge safe and are fireworks, nor within one hundred feet (100') of any premises where flammable liquids at. dispensed. elnimum setback from street curbing or shoulder shall he tee feet (10'). (3) Said safe and sane fireworks stands shall M located is to provide safe and reasonable Ingress slid egress thereto and to comply with the other pcovilwe, and terms of this ordl.,nee. Said stands shall be i stud ssb,t.,rtIally ac that place Indicated on the npprnved permit for such sell and one fireworks stand. (0) Separate stands shall not be located closer .ban thr— nnudr�d leer (300') .1-1. C. fun nst nits nn I (ll Safe .tad s.i a rirevnrks ::tu ,s temporary stru,turee, hIll not be eoble,I to the terms and L pi.elsions of the Building Code of sold city, apPllcahle 1. [lie ronstn¢tion of permanent structures r building., provided, however, tbnt all sock stands me treated under the ,supervision of the Rnlldinu Official and Fire Chief, who shall require uth =lands In b mstrntted in n which • will r.asonahly lnsure the safety 'If rleodan[u and Pal u, no. ordinance so. ;e Pace 4 (4) Each stand must have at least two (2) exits, thirty inches (30 ") in unobstructed width. All exit doors shall remain unlocked at alt dams when stands are occupied. Exit doers shall be operable from the inside without the a SP of a key or any special knowledge or erfell.There shall be maintained a thirty inch (30 ") unobstructed aisln.dy from all parts of the ac and to e.I, doors. Earn stand In excess of forty feet (40') in length must have at least three (J) exits, spaced approximately equal distance apart, provided, however, that in no case .hall a person have no [ravel a distance exceeding twenty -four feet (24') to reach an exit. D. Fire Protection Appliances (1) Each stand shall be provlded with two (2) two and one-half (My) gallon water pressure type fire extinguishers, in good working, order and easily accessible for use in case of fire. E. Security (1) Metal fly s eons, with sat less than 10 x 16 mesh openings, shall be provided cover ail open areas on the inside of the booths where safe and sane a fir evorks are stored or offered for sale. The Only exception to this requirement is the dispgnato, saves to which the public most say' "toes.. (2) Loch Aland most law' as adult watchman or .... odnnt in attendance and In charge thereof ar ell times while safe and sane fireworks are scored therein. No conking, list., or sleepinx [.111[X9 shill be a rahlished or maintained within a .rand. No watchman or gu,H shall steep inside any such stand. F. Vehicles Parking on Premises (1) There ::molt le no vehicle Parking ar parking of ga.'alias na nrx u v ,an of flammable 11,111d wnut"inurs within tvenly-itvn feet (25') of any sue), xc md. Some form of 'd "'ieal ba rr lraJe shall be provided to maintain 'Ills regvtrement. C. Removal of Cumbustihles it, All weeds and combustible material, not tneluding structures, shall be removed from the location of the s,.lnd for a minimum distance of twenty -five • feet (15') surrounding the eland, • (2) All uri Brian shall be lnscolied and n :stained In cordaner will, the luild(ne Code of said tie:, cent that ail electrical J,,ni,, entering such stands shall be cons,11nd through fuses or cult breakers not to exceed fifteen (15) amperes. 6lben the dleltncu fee. the stand Is the s of electrical peer exceed., o.,e hundred feet 1100'), a temporary electrical Cower pole or generaenr set slap be provided. (3) NO stand shall have a floor area in excess of three hundred twenty (320) square feet. (4) Each stand must have at least two (2) exits, thirty inches (30 ") in unobstructed width. All exit doors shall remain unlocked at alt dams when stands are occupied. Exit doers shall be operable from the inside without the a SP of a key or any special knowledge or erfell.There shall be maintained a thirty inch (30 ") unobstructed aisln.dy from all parts of the ac and to e.I, doors. Earn stand In excess of forty feet (40') in length must have at least three (J) exits, spaced approximately equal distance apart, provided, however, that in no case .hall a person have no [ravel a distance exceeding twenty -four feet (24') to reach an exit. D. Fire Protection Appliances (1) Each stand shall be provlded with two (2) two and one-half (My) gallon water pressure type fire extinguishers, in good working, order and easily accessible for use in case of fire. E. Security (1) Metal fly s eons, with sat less than 10 x 16 mesh openings, shall be provided cover ail open areas on the inside of the booths where safe and sane a fir evorks are stored or offered for sale. The Only exception to this requirement is the dispgnato, saves to which the public most say' "toes.. (2) Loch Aland most law' as adult watchman or .... odnnt in attendance and In charge thereof ar ell times while safe and sane fireworks are scored therein. No conking, list., or sleepinx [.111[X9 shill be a rahlished or maintained within a .rand. No watchman or gu,H shall steep inside any such stand. F. Vehicles Parking on Premises (1) There ::molt le no vehicle Parking ar parking of ga.'alias na nrx u v ,an of flammable 11,111d wnut"inurs within tvenly-itvn feet (25') of any sue), xc md. Some form of 'd "'ieal ba rr lraJe shall be provided to maintain 'Ills regvtrement. C. Removal of Cumbustihles it, All weeds and combustible material, not tneluding structures, shall be removed from the location of the s,.lnd for a minimum distance of twenty -five • feet (15') surrounding the eland, _a Ordinance Nu. 79 Pape 5 0 C. AnY m under he a of sirtuen (l6) y acing and r v.: shall be order then supervisions of'a respnns1,11 radule. o. an pers -m, fir., o nrganisatlon shall n.nufartnrn. store. uispl." [ell, offer for „tle, Paul"', dircharae, or oxplode, fin., a act off nee dangerous (iruwnrks within the City of Rancho Cucamurga. E. no fire ehiaf, or his duly mttharited rcptesenrntive, shall s , take, remove, o e to be at the expense of the o , all clerks of safe ,and c are fireworks offered or exposed far sale, or held L. violation of this ordinance. SECTION 9: PENALTIES A. Persons violating this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a mtsdemeaner and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $500.90, or by imprisonment in the County jail for a period not to exceed thirty (00) days, or bath such fine and lmprisrnm¢n[. Further violation of the license provisions shall be cause for the license to be revoked. SECTION _10: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attesc to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to he published within fifteen (15) days after Its passage, at least once in The Oaily Report, n rairep.par of general circulation published in the Gity of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho C:,pamnnga, Cali(o[n 1 e. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 19 79. AYES: Schlosser, Palombo, Mikely, Bridge, Frost. NOES: Name ABSENT: None Maw Al'il ST: etiy Clerk , L • _L-� 1 )0,3 nn!manee cn. 19 Pane i a /D17 Im (2) All tram all he r J fr,n [se cite ard .•, fin and and the .......c ,ash u, u n n1 c.o :!­. ni Mu,aa s. H. p"llo, of "NO S: NK[NI:' Signs (1) sItoKr%G., sign c, with l.¢[c rs ;: nche+ W,) un r hi,!,, vfall 1... pr,me.:ently di.pla:d .11 side. I of me safe and s fireworks sows , both inside and ou b;J e. No person shall s o or burn sov cigarettes• cigars, pipes, light safe and san flrwelks, matches or any .the[ rtaterial within uch sand or within a din[ance of rsen[y-five .vet (25') s.Iro.ndfoe such stand. 1. Alrrholit Sovvrnges (1) She .... anption of any alcoholic b e rages shzll be prohibited i and around any safe ,ad sane fireworks stand• e J. Storage of Safe and Sane Fireworks (1) Safe and Sane fireworks Shall be stored only in tho safe and sane fireworks stand. It shall be unlawful for any person to store safe and sane fireworks in any building, residence, gat.l., home automobile, [railer, a other vehicle within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, except for temporary storage of shall quantities In a residence during • the period of pernfteed pale, as deflned in Section 4C. ■(` LK. Removal of Unsold Stock ld stock shall be r owed from the I....ton (t) All u s. n by I2 ;00 ones on the fro dayof July. L. Erection /Removal of Safe and Sane Firlworks Stand (1) No safe and sane fireworks stand shall be installed prior to 12:00 noon on the tom day of Jon. arm ash such stand shall be reeved from the temporary location by 12:00 noon on the ][h day of July of the same czleoda year. SECTION g; PROHIBITIONS ON DISCHARGE. A. It shall be unlawful for any person to Ignite, explode, project, or othervise fire or use any safe and sane flrcvnrks or permit the Ignition, explosion at pr jee[lon [hereof upon ver, or unto the property of another without his 1 Tl, or two ignita, exp LW r, pr.j IIL, .tF rcv Lse fire Or make us. of o n safe and sane fireworks .111,10 0 ten fee[ (ID') Of any residence, _ dwelling, .,he, str ort e se nr rad as +place of R. hahitation by human beings. Se(e and sone fl.... ks 0,Il hot he discharged within any hiy'h (i_ ho bid n of said city. an do,ignn[ed and shown on the fire Prevention Burrau map at till' Fnatntll Fire District Station 02, 9612 San Bernardino Road, Ranrho Cucne.,. , n r if a fire hngnrd would ,visit floo sotb disvhor;e. /D17 Im — -- — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �cCocAMQ5L MEMORANDUM , September 14, 1982 F i2 TO: City Council FROM: Jim Frost Councilman SUBJECT: Fireworks - Item 7A The purpose of again raising the fireworks sale issue is twofold: A. The existing ordinance has been on the books long enough that some limited review of its content may be of use. Given potential State mandate, the question of sale may be moot. Continued use of Fireworks is probably also unworthy of debate; many organizations and individuals benefit. At best, discussion would be a no -win situation and will probably be post- poned until after our first safe - and -sane related catastrophe, if any. As noted, the ordinance itself relates only to "use and sale. B. Who and why? Ambiguity of direction and the proliferation of "eligible" organizations suggest that extensive review begin immediately. This item has been delayed for the past several years, although specific discussion has bubbled to the surface occasionally. There are at least four areas in need of direction: 1. Quantity of booths 2. Who is expected to be the final beneficiary of the sales 3. Who should be allowed to sell Within these categories, we also need to determine if existing practice is appropriate, or whether we should either tighten (restrict), or loosen our regulations. 4. How can we do more to increase the safety factor for the consumer through awareness or other programs. When the Citizens' Advisory Commission has heard the issue in the past, its direction was primarily to recommend a "yes" or "no" on the subject of sale and use. I would suggest as one of Council's options that the CAC be directed to hold public hearings again and make findings and recommendations in regard to the "who" and "why" aspect. Should Council again wish to delve into the fire- works issue, I would further suggest that any action be completed before the end of the calendar year. JF:ba RESOLUTION NO. * °% ) - � 7 L. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMENDING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN COMMITTEE FOR THEIR WORK ON THE PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. WHEREAS, the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee was assigned a task to prepare a draft Specific Plan for the Etiwanda area; and WHEREAS, the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee unselfishly devoted its time and energy through many public meetings and study sessions in preparation of the draft Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Committee solicited and received extensive public input in order to assist in arriving at policies of the draft Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Committee deligently completed their task of the preparation of the Draft Specific Plan in order to provide a comprehensive document for review by the Planning Commission. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council extends its sincere appreciation and gratitude for the interest and effort to all members of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Committee in completing the draft Etiwanda Specific Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk ARTHUR H. BRIDGE 8715 BANYAN STREET ALTA LOMA, CALIFORNIA 91701 September 15, 1962 City Council City of Karcho Cucar_on-a Dear Sirs, For the past three years, I have repeatedly called to your atten- tion the extreme threat of fire that exists in the abandoned orch- ard on the north side of Banyan between Beryl and Sacramento Streets. Each year, this condition has become more acute. It is known that a major number of fires are started by arsonists. This abandoned Trove would provide a ready tinderbox, not only to intentional fire setters but also to accidental fires. Children are in and through t!,ds area almost constantly. The lemon trees are definitely abandoned, having had absolutely no care for some five or six years. The tall eucalyptus windbreaks that have depended upon orchard irrigation are almost entirely dead. The weeds that were partially cut some fourteen months ago are now replaced by a new crop that is shoulder hivh and rapidly drying. '.rith the approaching windy season, a fire storm could easily develop that could conceivably not only wipe out a large part of the resid- ential area surroundinc, this property but also could extend to neiwhborinu areas. The Etiwanda fire of only a few years ago could har.pen here, with the major difference that, instead of scorched windbreaks of Etiwanda, homes and property could be destroyed with a possible loss of lives. My intention in addressing this letter to the City Council of Rancho �;ucaconga is not only to ro on record with my concerns but also to brine to the attention of the Council that a state of emergency h.,s been reached that requires immediate emergency action. truly y� L Arthur tl. nrid qe 1. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, on Wednesday, September 15, 1982. The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were: Council members Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Rick Gomez; Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau; Finance Director, Harry Empey, and Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to approve the minutes of August 4, and August 9, 1982. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Mayor Mikels presented a Proclamation to the Vineyard Little League congratulating them on their participation in the Little League World Series. Although they did not win the series, they did advance to become one of the finalist. b Mr. Wasserman requested changes in the agenda as follows: Requested that items 3c and 3e, and item 5B be removed; item 4B be continued; and add item 5E, Approval of Resolution of Commendation for the Etiwanda Specific Plan Committee. 3• CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -9 -15 in the amount of =642,042.23. b. Recommend approval of escrow instructions for the purchase of right- ' of -way for Assessment District 82 -1 with Assessment District funds. C. Rosamond appwaa} at: a City -state agpeo"Rt Cap €wadi06 a€ kho VIReyard AvoRee Aeaanstpwatk*R Ppe39a4 and p000moR4 awapd of eaRtpaet to the haw tiddep, Red Wi }} GoRatpweton Company Pop ;244rS64.59. (Item removed from the Agenda) R9996WT ;CN NC. 42 -363 A A66C6WT ;CN OF THE C ;TY CGWNG ;6 CF THE G;T* OF AANGWC CWCANGNGAr CA6 ;FGAN4Ar AWTWCA46;NC TW6 6%6C9T ;GN OF 69CA6 ACBNGY STATE ACNSWMNT NO. 99-5429, SUPP69MENT NC. 5. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7294, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A HEAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM MESSENGER INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. e. AaeePtaRee OF PaPeal Map 7555T "PdfiT ORPeemeNtT &NA YaeetiOR Of a ROPt"R e€ Pi%,"Wrgh AvoRme - R. V. IRAVatPial Oamgany. (Item removed from Agenda) RES06OTION NO. 52 -364 A RESOLUTION OF THE 94TY OOUNOI6 OF THE OITV OF RANCHO OUOAMONOA, OA6IFORNIA, APPROVING PAROE6 MAP NYNBSR V555T IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVRMENT SEOURITV. RE9O6UTION NO. 52 -365 A RE5O6UTION OF THE OITV OOVNOI6 OF TNS OITV OF RANONO OUOMAONOA, BA6IFORNIA, awNWARI61 ORDRAINO THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF PITTSBURG AVENOS. f. Approval to Annex Tract 9658 into the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 - Annexation No. 10. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -166 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT h. Ci., by s o. to Ci„y , handling. i. Release of Bond for Parcel Map 6582, located on the southeast corner of Helms and Foothill - Praver Bros. Investments. Faithful Performance Bond $51,600 Labor 6 Material Bond $25,800 J. Approval to Change the Title of the Maintenance Supervisor to that of Maintenance Superintendent. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve the Consent Calendar with the deletion of jtems c and e. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 81 -04 - WILSON A change of zone from R- 1- 20,000 (single family residential - 20,000 square foot lot minimum) to R- 1- 10,000 (single family residential - 10,000 square foot lot minimum) for 6.9 acres of land located on Banyan Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201- 251 -63 and 64. Staff report presented by Rick Gomez, city planner. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Dahl stated that possibly in the future Banyan might be extended; therefore, he felt that we should continue the name of the street as Banyan insteat of Mandarin. Mr. Gomez stated the street name has not been approved. Mr. Wasserman stated that this is something that could be taken care of later, and we could proceed with approve of the zone change now. Mr. Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 183. ORDINANCE NO. 183 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201- 251-63 AND 64, LOCATED SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM R- 1- 20,000 TO R- 1- 10,000. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 183. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels set second reading of Ordinance No. 183 for October 6, 1982. B. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES An ordinance establishing public notification procedures for Planning Commission public hearings. Mr. Wasserman requested that the item be continued. CITY UC IC ISS ESTABLISHING PLANNING COrR't PROCEDURES FOR HEARINGS. RESOLUTION N0. 82-168 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE OF COCAMONGA, CALIPER CITY p RESOLUTION O RANCNO 2 AND 3 NO THE 79,t CITY SECTIONS AMENDING RESOLUTION COUNCIL CERTAIN FEES REESTABLISHING Just in case someone rustoI the Public the meeting for public hearing There being no mayor Mikels °Pend the item. October ant to address continue Stem to wrsa pre! closed. Frost to hearing was seconded by Motion: Moved by Schlosser, 6 q82 Motion carried unanimously 5' 0. A request has been received by Yukon STAFF REPORTS come effective on CITY MANAGER`S a rate increase t° tor. 5' INCREASE REQUEST e Dirac RATE oral for Empey, Pinan REFUSE Rancho DisP Harry Addressing A U sp� al and report by hearing• Staff for puD11c opened the meeting M,. ptayor Mikels increase was. was: t the Percentage requested. Council asked wha a being Vallenee 6 v4 increase wa closed +Livia Lee that a Public' Mayor Mikels Spey responded the from There being n° furtofrthe smeeting- Banyan. He could not ublic portion above an. the P rate differ above BanY in rates for those few people Dahl questioned the were s° higher increase there rate being Justify an surprised with the time to study he was difficulty take more Buquet stated he had t council Mr. He also sHet suggested the present. because of the north of Banyan* increase was because paying' this. stated his they were aria new quarter Disposal, Dip which with for a decision �•k,, Burr, of Rancho County basis at on a quarterly were asking rate increase is they billing Therefore, for ResidentiaOctober billing Period starting Disposal, stated his tonight- uarter on October 1• Of Yukon in the new Q t this Mr Avakian, also beg not Give the increase residential would Bugnt stated that if council to higher at January 1st time, then the increase could for the loss. the increase, therefore, most of the investiga on has already been done for council. Regarding the dates for requesting increases, the County had changed this from October 1st to July 1st. Mr. Buquet stated t::at he really needed more time to talk with the other members of the council regarding this. He felt this could wait until next July for approval, Mr. Avaklan stated that last year when they requested a rate increase, there was a problem existing. This problem came when the Cith was working on the contracts and requesting mandatory refuse service. After further discussion between the council and Mr. Burr and Mr. Avakian, council made the following decision: Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve the rates of $5.30, $6.45, and $7.15 as applicable to the area. Mr. Frost suggested that the companies next year not to put in an increase at the same time the County does. Next time if the companies came in late, then they would wait until January of the next year. Mr. Burr stated he would like to coincide this with the County report which is due May 1 of each year. Mr. Buquet stated that people will be asking why there wasn't a public hearing on this. It was even presented as a staff report. Mr. Frost requested that the companies to do a public notice and for this to appear on the Consent Calendar setting the public hearing date. Both companies concurred that they would in the future publish a notice in the local newspapers and to notify people through the billing process. Added to the motion was that the companies would provide the necessary advance publications and notification for the public hearing. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels. NOES: Buquet. ABSENT: None. B. CREATION OF SENIOR DEPUTY POSITION Recommendation: to approve the new clasification of Senior Deputy. Total increase in contract for change would be $3,977.00. Council concurred with the staff request to continue item to sometime in November. C. BUDGET REVISION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83 As a result of completed estimate of tax increments from the San Bernardino County Auditor's Office, a budget revision is requested for 1982 -83. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. ADVANCING MONEY TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENG AGENCY IN ORDER TO INCUR DEBT TO THE AMOUNT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to approve Resolution No. 82 -169 and to waive further reading. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. There being none, the public portion of the meeting was closed. The motion carried unanimously 5 -0 to approve Resolution No 82 -169. Mayor Mikels called a recess at 9:05 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:25 p.m. with all members of council and staff present. Mr. Wasserman stated that Consent Calendar item 3c needed to be discussed by the Council. He did not understand what the situation was. Council concurred that it would be discussed at the end of the staff reports. D. CONSIDERATION OF A FINANCIAL SYSTEM COMPUTER PACKAGE Staff report by Harry Empey, Mayor Mikels asked how much was budgeted .`or this item. Mr. Empey responded that nothing had been budgeted. They were recommending that funds come from other sources. Council discussed the advantages and disadvantages of a microcomputer. Mr. Doug Ayres, proposed consultant for the project, explained his proposal to the council. After further discussion, Mr. Dahl recommended that Council give conceptual approval and direct staff to draw up an appropriate contract for consideration. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to approve the concept for the computer program, and to direct staff to draw up the appropriate contract documentation for consideration. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. E. ADDED ITEM: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. City Clerk Wasserman read Resolution No. 82 -170 in full. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING THE ETIWAND SPECIFIC PLAN COMMITTEE FOR THEIR WORK ON THE PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. __ to in __s following: 1. Discussions on Saturday at their last meeting were so the Committee could critique the document as it came from staff. 2. Committee recommended approval and adoption of the Plan as it left the Committee. 3. Also provided by Resolution some language indicating individuals and groups who would have options of reforming the Committee for discussion for purposes of clarification and potential modification. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. DISCUSSION OF CONSENT CAL3NDAR ITEM 3c. Paul Rougeau requested that council defer the awarding of the contract, but to proceed with the approval of the Resolution in order to continue negotiations with the State. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Resolution No. 82 -161. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF LOCAL AENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08 -5420, SUPPLEMENT NO. 5. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to appro'ia Resolution No. 82 -161 and to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS There were none. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. ORDINANCE NO. 78. PROVIDING FOR SALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREWORKS Mr. Frost made the presentation of the item. He indicated that there needed to be study made into the following areas: 1, quantity of booths allowed in the City. 2. Who is expected to be final beneficiary of the sales. 3. Who should be allowed to sell. 4. How to increase safety factor. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to refer item to the CAC to investigate the items referred to by Mr. Frost with specific direction for a study on the eligibility for those who are allowed to sell. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mr. Dahl stated that if there are some future funding methods available for a city hall, he hoped that also meant there were some alternatives available for getting new parks. C. Mr. Arthur Bridge read a letter regarding harzardous abandoned orchards; in particular, the one located next to his property. He suggested that both the city manager and city attorney get in touch with the owner of record of the parcel and explain that since there is a hazard that he will be liable and to seek his cooperation in getting rid of the hazard. Mr. Wasserman stated that staff would call the owners and see if something could be done. If it can't be, then staff will come back to the council. Mr. Frost stated that he felt badly that nothing had been done and wanted a written report back from staff within a week as to what has been done. 8. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to adjourn. Motion Carrie- unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 10:25 p.m. Respectfully �submitted, e Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk