HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995/07/05 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
July 5, 1995
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City Councilmembers
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Rex Gutierrez, Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane, Councilmember
James V. Curatalo, Councilmember
Diane Willjams, Councilmember
Jack Lam, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Office: 989-1851
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1995
PAGE
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The
deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the
meeting. The City Clerk°s Office receives all such items.
1. Roll Call:
A. CALL TO ORDER
Alexander Biane , Curatalo
Gutierr~z , and Williams
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of $500.00 from Target Stores to the Rancho Cucamonga
Cdme Prevention Unit for Shoplifting Prevention Education.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council.
State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously
included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the
matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes
per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without
discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the
audience for discussion.
Approval of Minutes:
June 7,1995
June 8,1995
June 14,1995
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 6/14/95 and 6/21/95; and Payroll ending
6/15/95 for the total amount of $1,442,976.60.
Approval to appropriate funds from Fund Balance and authorize the
advertising of the "Nob Inviting Bids" for the construction of Base Line road
Temporary Widening and Rehabilitation, from Day Creek Channel to Victoda
Park Lane, to be funded from Transportation Systems Development Fund
Account No. 22-4637-9306 and S.B. 140 Fund, Account No. 35-4637-9306.
l0
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1995
PAGE
RESOLUTION NO. 95-103
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BASE
LINE ROAD TEMPORARY WIDENING AND
REHABILITATION, FROM DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO
VICTORIA PARK LANE, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN
SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
Approval of Extension of Comcast Cable T.V. Franchise.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-012U
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE
WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON
EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Approval of summan/vacations of portions of vadous excess City rights-of-
way located on 24th Street, 25th Street and Center Avenue and ordedng the
annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for DR 95-03, located within the Northtown
Area along 24th Street, 25th Street and Humboldt Avenue, east of Hermosa
Avenue, submitted by Northtown Housing Development Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-104
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING
THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY. TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 2 FOR DR 95-03
RESOLUTION NO. 95-105
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY
ORDERING THE VACATIONS OF PORTIONS OF
VARIOUS EXCESS RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LOCATED ON
24TH STREET, 25TH STREET AND CENTER AVENUE
11
15
16
17
19
22
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1995
PAGE
10.
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and
ordedng the annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 3B and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos, 1 and 6 for DR 95-09, located on the
northeast comer of Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue, submitted by Frito-
Lay, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-106
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 95-09
RESOLUTION NO. 95-107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING
THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR DR 95-09
Approval of a resolution authorizing agreements with the California Highway
Patrol for participation in training programs.
RESOLUTION 95-108
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY AND
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF THE
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, AUTHORIZING
PARTICIPATION BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN
TRAINING PROGRAMS ADMINISTERED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
Approval to execute an agreement to co-sponsor concerts with Acts
Concerts (CO 95-024) at Rancho Cucamonga's Epicenter. (Continued
from June 27, 1995)
Approval to execute a Cooperative Agreement (CO 95-025) with the County
of San Bernardino for participation in the County's Home Consodium.
Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 95-026)
for Calaveras Street Improvements, from Arrow Route to Ninth Street, for the
amount of $160,938.80 ($146,328.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded
from CDBG Account No. 28-4637-9115 to Gentn/Brothers.
36
38
39
42
43
44
52
53
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1995
PAGE
11.
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13759,
located on the west side of Haven Avenue, south of Victoda Street, submitted
by Fu Mai Limited.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-109
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13754
57
59
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had duly advertised public hearings on June 21,
1995. The first reading is expected to be routine and non-controversial. They
will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City
Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion.
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 95-01 NORTHTOWN
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to change the land
use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium
Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main
Street (south side of Main Street, east of Archibald Avenue). The City will
also consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M"
(Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-O62-01.
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-01 - NORTHTOWN
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to change the land
use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium
Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main
Street (south side of Main Street, east of Archibald Avenue). The City will
also consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M"
(Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-062-01.
ORDINANCE NO. 541 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 95-01,
CHANGING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM
INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR
1.38 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF
ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-062-01
60
E1
60
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1995
PAGE
5
ORDINANCE NO. 542 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.
95-O1 REMOVING FROM THE INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP 1.38 ACRES
DESIGNATED INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 17)
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET
APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD
AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 209-062-01
The following Ordinance had a duly advertised public hearing on May 17, 1995.
The second reading is expected to be routine and non-controversial. It will be
acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will
read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion.
,
CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH A SPEED
LIMIT OF 35 MPH ON CHURCH STREET FROM PEPPER STREET TO
ARCHIBALD AVENUE: AND A SPEED LIMIT OF 35 MPH ON MORNING
PLACE AND VINTAGE DRIVE FROM BANYAN STREET TO MILLIKEN
AVENUE
ORDINANCE NO. 540 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCMAONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIE
SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS
65
69
70
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as
required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF
A NOTE IN A PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $25 MILLION TO
PROVIDE FOR THE FINANCING OF CERTAIN MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECTS (Continued from June 27, 1995)
75
City Council Agenda
July 5, 1995
PAGE
6
RESOLUTION NO. 95-110
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZNG
THE ISSUANCE OF A NOTE IN A PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED $25,000,000 TO PROVIDE FINANCING
FOR CERTAIN MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS,
APPROVING A FORM OF LOAN AGREEMENT AND THE
PLEDGE BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CERTAIN TAX
INCREMENT MONEYS AND OTHER MATTERS
RELATING THERETO
77
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The
Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the
Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion.
They am not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for
public input.
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 8.30 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TAXICABS
CONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY AD HOC COMMITTEE'S
RECOMMENDATIONS TO FILL LIBRARY BOARD VACANCIES (Oral
Report)
81
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the
next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified
for the next meeting.
City Co ~ncil Agenda
July 5, 1995
PAGE
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council.
State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously
included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the
matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes
per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTNE SESSION TO DISCUSS:
(A)
LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6
TO GIVE ROBERT DOMINGUEZ, ADMINISTRATNE SERVICES
DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER
PROCESS; AND
(B)
PROPERTY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8, LOCATED AT
9591 SAN BERNARDINO RD, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
AND LARRY HENDERSON, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, NEGOTIATING
PARTIES; REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT.
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee,
hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June
29, 1995, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2
at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
June 7, 1995
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
ReQular Meetina
A. CALLTO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, June 7, 1995, in the
Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m, by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Willlares, and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City
Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Alan Warren, Associate
Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Robert Dominguez, Administrative
Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Marti Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Manager; Deborah Clark,
library Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Capt. Ron
Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of Proclamations to Sally Timms and her Search Dog Jethro and Sharon Gattas and her
Search Dog Dauger, for Outstanding Service in the Rescue Effort of the Federal Building in the Oklahoma City
Bombing.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamations to Sharon Gattas and Sally Timms.
Sharon Gattas thanked the Council and stated they were glad to be able to put their training to use and help
out.
Sally Timms stated she is glad to be able volunteer for Rancho Cucamonga and help out in Oklahoma.
B2. Mayor Alexander presented the GFOA award to Susan Stark for excellence in financial reporting.
Susan Stark thanked the staff and department heads for making her job easier.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 1995
Page 2
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1.
Steve Jennings, 12335 Sweetgum, asked that cable television be placed on the agenda for discussion.
He pointed out that the cable is increasing in rates and yet they are not getting quality service. He
stated he does get good response by the cable company, but that once something is fixed it does not
stay fixed. He stated the cable people tell him their equipment is not good quality. He felt he should
be reimbursed when the cable goes out for the whole day. He did not feel he should have to pay for
the PEG channel when it is not working at the present time. He stated he was told the Council would
sit beck and see how the cable company does instead of holding the reins on them. He stated he was
told he could not have an antenna on his roof per his CC&R's, yet people in his neighborhood are still
puffing them up, He asked that this matter be agendized for the next meeting.
C2.
John Campbell, 6620 Santolina, complimented the staff on the Filippi Winery project and felt it was
very good. He complimented the City for what had been done with the Library. He also asked for the
cable issue to come back on the agenda at a future meeting because of the increasing cost for the
service. He did not agree with how cable is a monopoly instead of various companies to choose from.
He stated he would like to see televising of Council meetings. He thanked the Council for their work
they do all the time in the City.
C3.
Sean Hogue, Marks Cablevision, stated he would do anything to rectify their problems and that they
would like to get with those that just spoke. He stated he is willing to meet with them to work out their
problems. He also felt they should not have to pay for a service they are not receiving. He continued
to explain fiberoptics and why there have been rate increases.
Mayor Alexander stated this should come back at the next Council meeting for discussion.
C4.
Marcus Solomon, 2504 College, Berkely, and also a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, distributed some
material to the Council regarding his classes from school. He stated he is trying to get skateboarders
more into reading and what he is doing to promote this. He asked that the Council oppose Prop 187.
Councilmember Williams stated she liked the idea of the literacy program for the skateboarders.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/10/95 and 5/17/95; and Payroll ending 5/4/95 and 5/18/95 for
the total amount of $1,652,410.41.
D2. Approval of Historic Landmark Designation 95-01 - David R. Moore, and consideration of an application
to designate the Kincaid Ranch as a Local Landmark, located at 9449 Ninth Street - APN: 209-032-21.
Related files: Historic Landmark Alternation Permit 95-02 and Mills Act Agreement 95-02.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-082
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVING HISTORIC
LANDMARK 95-01 DESIGNATING THE KINCAID RANCH HOUSE, LOCATED AT
9449 NINTH STREET, AS A LANDMARK - APN: 209-032-21
D3. Approval of Mills Act Agreement 95-02 - David R. Moore - to execute a Mills Act Contract with David
R. Moore for the restoration of the Kincaid Rancho House, a designated local landmark, located at 9449 Ninth
Street - APN: 209-032-21.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 1995
Page 3
D4. Approval of Mills Act Agreement 95-01 - Wesley and Dorothy West - to execute a Mills Act Contract
with Wesley and Dorothy West for the restoration of the G.P. Ledig House, a designated local landmark,
located at 5759 Hellman Avenue - APN: 1062-071-24.
D5. Approval to execute the Operation Area Development Agreement (CO 95-016) between San
Bernardino County and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, according to the new Statewide Standardized
Emergency Management System (SEMS) requirement.
D6. Approval of a request to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (CO 95-017) for the purpose of
developing and implementing a Habitat Conservation Plan to conserve wildlib and plant species of concern
in the San Bernardino Valley.
D7. Approval to execute the Improvement Agreement and Security for the Dunlop Tire Facility located
within the City of Ontado on the south side of Fourth Street east of Santa Anita Avenue, submitted by Catellus
Development Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-083
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND SECURITY FOR THE DUNLOP TIRE FACILITY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY
OF ONTARIO
D8. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13281 located on the northwest
corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Brock Homes.
rESOLUTION NO. 95-084
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13281
D9.
Haven Avenue at Amber Lane, submitted by Sheffield Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-085
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13703
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13703 located on the west side of
D10. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13851 located on the northeast
corner of Wilson Avenue and Canistel Avenue, submitted by Pacific International Development, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-086
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13851
D11. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14407 located on the southwest corner of
Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewis Homes.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 1995
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 95-087
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14407
D 12. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Noljce of Completion for Tract 14121 located
on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Kenyon Way.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street)
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street)
$459,800.00
45,980.00
RESOLUTION NO. 95-088
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 14121 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
D13. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 13930 located on Wilson Avenue at
Hellman Avenue.
Release:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street)
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Storm Dr)
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Utilities)
$ 29,700.00
56,400.00
19,000.00
D14. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 14192-1 located on the east side of
Hellman Avenue south of 19th Street.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 75,900.00
D15. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 12959-1 located on the southeast
corner of Arrow Highway and White Oak Avenue.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 134,000.00
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports
contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH A SPEED LIMIT OF 35 MPH ON
CHURCH STREET FROM PEPPER STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND A SPEED LIMIT OF 35 MPH
ON MORNING PLACE AND VINTAGE DRIVE FROM BANYAN STREET TO MILLIKEN AVENUE
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 540.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 1995
Page 5
ORDINANCE NO. 540 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 540. Motion
carded unanimously, 5-0.
No items were submitted.
No items were submitted.
No items were submitted.
No items were submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications were made from the public.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 1995
Page 6
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to recess to an ExecuWe Session to discuss (A) Property
per Government Code 54956.8, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Blvd and Rochester Avenue; Valley
Baseball and Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, negotiating parties, regarding terms of payment; and (B)
Labor Negotiations per Govemment Code Section 54957.6 to give Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services
Director, direction in regards to the meet and confer process; and for Executive Session to adjourn to a Budget
Adoption meeting on June 8, 1995, 5:00 p.m. to be held in the Council Chambers. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0. The meeting recessed at 7:41, not to reconvene. No action was taken in Executive Session.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
June 8, 1995
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Adjourned Meetinn
A. CALL TO ORDER
An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Thursday, June 8, 1995 in the
Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The meeting was called to order at 5:19 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Willjams, and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Manager; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer;
Rose Colum, Accountant; Ingdd Blair, GIS Supervisor; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Gail Sanchez,
Planning Commission Secretary; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Suzanne Ota,
Community Services Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Kathy Sorensen, Recreation
Superintendent; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Chief Dennis Michael, Deputy Chief Bob Corcoran and
Administrative Services Officer Alex Ahumada - Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Ron
Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan
Mickey, Management Analyst I; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
B1. ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 BUDGET AND ARTICLE XIII-B APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was
closed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Resolutions No. 95-089 and 95-090.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-089
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 1995/96
BUDGET
City Council Minutes
June 8, 1995
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO. 95-090
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIII-B OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution Nos. 95-089 and 95-090. Motion
carded unanimously, 5-0.
C. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION
C1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ENACT AN AGREEMENT ('CO 95-017) FOR FUNDING
FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES DURING FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City
Manager.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Resolution No. 95-091.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-091
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR
FUNDING OF FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 95-091. Motion carded
unanimously, 5-0.
C2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A UTILITY USER TAX REDUCTION FORMULA
Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Resolution No. 95-092.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-092
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING ENACTMENT OF A FORMULA FOR
ULTIMATE REDUCTION AND ELIMINATION OF THE UTILITY USER'S TAX IN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council was:
Gary Christian, President of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, read a Resolution
adopted by the Chambers Board of Directors on June 7, 1995, which is also on file in the City Clerk's
office. He stated he felt the Council should take a more aggressive approach beyond the 25% and that
this amount is a little conservative. The Chamber felt it should be 50%.
There being no further comments, public input was closed.
City Council Minutes
June 8, 1995
Page 3
Mayor Alexander stated if there is any way the tax can be reduced more than 25% then he would be in favor
of it.
Councilmember Williams said she would go along with this as long as it can be addressed every year. She felt
it should actually be looked at every six months.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he wishes the City could be more aggressive with the lowering of the tax.
Councilmember Biane stated he agreed with previous comments made by Mayor Alexander and
Coundlmembers Gut~errez and Williams, but because of item C3 to be heard next, that is why the Council can't
be more aggressive with the lowering of the utility tax. He stated he supported this Resolution.
Councilmember Curatalo felt this was a good plan and that he supported what has been said.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 95-092. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
C3. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OPPOSING ENACTMENT OF ADDITIONAL 6% OVERHEAD
CHARGE ON LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT BY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY (ADDENDUM) Staff
report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. He added that the Chamber also supports this.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input, Addressing the City Council was:
Gary Chris~an, President of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, read another Resolution
into the record that had been adopted by the Chamber Board which is on file in the City Clerk's office.
There being no further comments, public input was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-093
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE ADDITION OF A 6% OVERHEAD
CHARGE ON LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT BY THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 95-093. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
City Council Minutes
June 8, 1995
Page 4
E. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn to a workshop to discuss fire sprinklers on
Wednesday, June 14, 1995, 5:30 p.m. in the Td-Communffies Conference Room located at 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 5:41 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
June 14, 1995
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Adjourned Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, June 14, 1995, in the Tri
Communities Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The
meeting was called to order at 5:38 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams and Mayor William J.
Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Marksman, Legal Counsel; Chief Dennis Michael and Deputy Fire
Marshal Ralph Crane, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Jim Martin,
Plan Check Coordinator; John Thomas, Sr. Plans Examiner/Fire; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; and Debra J. Adams, City
Clerk.
B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION
1. DISCUSSION OF RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER ORDINANCE
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the purpose of the meeting is to inform the City Council about the Fire Sprinkler
Ordinance and have discussion on it.
Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, gave staff presentation. Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District, presented additional information on this subject.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council were:
Frank Williams, Executive Director of the Building Industry Association, stated he is here to ask the City
Council to repeal the Ordinance. He stated they are not opposed to residential fire sprinklers, but felt it should
be left up to the homeowner to decide on this matter. He did not feel fire sprinklers would cut back on fire
services needed. He also distributed a handout on reducing local fire expenditures. He also distributed the
Baldy View Bulletin of May 1995 which had an article on fire sprinklers. He stated he is not here to debate if
sprinklers are good or bad, but should the homeowner be able to decide for themselves about the sprinklers
being installed in their homes.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked why Upland repealed their Ordinance.
Frank Williams stated for all of the reasons he has mentioned tonight and that they felt the homeowners should
make their own decision on this matter.
Councilmember Curatalo asked if Mr. Williams would consider any other cost other than "0" figure.
Mr. Williams stated that is what it should be. He stated cost is a big issue.
City Council Minutes
June 14, 1995
Page 2
Councilmember Curatalo asked if he would go for it with a "0" cost.
Mr. Willjams stated if the Council does not repeal the Ordinance he would be happy if the cost is "0".
Councilmember Williams asked if he expects for the City to pay for the installation.
Mr. Williams suggested there could possibly be fee credits and other ways to cover this.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated that at a previous meeting it was discussed about how many deaths had occurred in
residential fires.
Chief Michael gave statistics on fires in 1993. He stated the last death was several years ago.
Mr. Williams stated he is only talking about single family detached when making his points.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is having a hard time comprehending why anyone can say sprinklers are saving lives
over smoke detectors.
Chief Michael stated that more equipment, etc. is sent out on a fire call because of knowing there are not fire sprinklers
in order to take care of the problem.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he was concerned about the number of deaths due to smoke inhalation.
The Council inquired as to the cost for a residential fire sprinkler system.
John Thomas, Sr. Plans Examiner/Fire, presented information that it would cost from $ .55 to $ .67 per square foot for
homes between 1,500 and 3,000 square feet. Other costs have been quoted at $ .51 to $ .71 per square foot to $ .55 to
$ .63 per square foot for a tract home.
Councilmember Curatalo stated he is concerned about the cost, but it was the safety factor that he is most concerned
about and that is his priority.
Ralph Crane, Deputy Fire Marshal, presented information on "Chart for'Time vs. Products of Combustion".
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he did not feel there were enough stats to make a comparison if residential fn'e
sprinklers were effective.
Mayor Alexander stated he knows the BIA is out for the best of the community. He stated unless you have more fire
fighters and more stations, you are not going to get the same protection as if there are residential lure sprinklers. He felt
the City needs to look into water pressure and the cost for residential fire sprinklers. He did not think there should be
a charge for plan check fees for residential fire sprinklers.
Councilmember Curatalo felt Mayor Alexander had a good idea and was in favor of working towards a "0" cost as Mr.
Williams stated.
Councilmember Biane stated he feels residents should have the choice if they want the sprinklers or not and that of all
the Realtors he has talked to, they have never been told by a buyer that they want residential fire sprinklers.
City Council Minutes
June 14, 1995
Page 3
Mayor Alexander stated he felt the City took a major step when they adopted this Ordinance and did not feel the Council
should take a step backwards.
John Lyons talked about when he was on the Foothill Fire Board and gave stab of fires during that time period.
He reported of a fire that took place years ago and that if there had been residential fire sprinklers lives would
have been saved.
Russ Blewitt, immediate past president of the BIA, stated he felt residential fire sprinklers were a waste of
money.
Gary Kendric felt it was inconceivable to repeal the Ordinance. He felt the Ordinance should be left as is and
did not feel the cost was that great.
James Marksman, City Attomey, stated he has been threatened that Rancho Cucamonga would be sued if the Ordinance
is not repealed. He stated Upland gave in because of a lawsuit in Vallejo where the City lost and that is why Upland
gave in. He stated there has been another lawsuit in Livermore and that the information has been given to City staff
regarding this. He felt in the end that Livermore will be given the authority to keep the Ordinance, but that it is not
definite at this time. He stated it is an open legal issue at this time and that there has been no appeal filed as yet.
Councilmember Curatalo asked how long it would take before this case is decided for sure.
James Marksman, City Attorney, stated about one year.
John Roberts, City Councilmember in Fontana, stated he has sprinklers in his home and that Fontaria has had
a fire sprinkler Ordinance since 1986. He stated after the first six months it had been approved, they never
heard any complaints about it. He stated Fontana is looking out for the best interests of the citizens.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he feels this is an unfunded mandate and did not agree with this. He felt the City was
being hypocritical by enforcing this. He stated he did not want to push this on anyone else because of the statistics
presented for Rancho Cucamonga.
Councilmember Wi!liams stated she agreed with Councilmember Gutierrez. She stated until the state mandates this,
she did not feel the City should require this, and felt if the City does keep enforcing this, it is being hypocritical. She
stated after calling insurance companies and asking what kind of discount one might get for having residential fire
sprinklers, she was told only about $5.00. She stated she felt the energy should be placed towards the state to put this
in the state building codes.
Mayor Alexander stated he felt this was a giant step backwards by getting rid of this Ordinance.
Councilmember Curatalo stated he felt this was a money issue, but also felt it was a safety issue. He felt if one child
dies because of getting rid of this Ordinance, he would never be able to live with himself. He felt it was his job to work
for the safety of the residents. He felt it was hypocritical to repeal the Ordinance. He stated he felt cost should be
worked on to help satisfy the BIA's concerns on this.
Mr. Roberts, Fontana City Council, stated his Council has always looked up to Rancho Cucamonga and felt
they were the "jewel of the Inland Empire", and were proud to be our neighbor. He added he is surprised that
the Council would take a step backwards by repealing this Ordinance.
City Council Minutes
June 14, 1995
Page 4
Councilmember Gutierrez reiterated that this is an unfunded mandate and did not agree with the Ordinance.
Councilmember Blanc stated he is still wanting to give people the option of doing what they want to and did not agree
with this mandate. He did feel people should be given an option when purchasing a home under construction, and that
the wording needed to be looked at with the developers.
Councilmember Gutierrez felt hillside property should be considered differently in this Ordinance.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Curatalo not to repeal the Ordinance, but to work with staff and the BIA
to lower the cost. Motion failed 2 -3 (Blanc, Gutierrez, Williams voted no).
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Blanc to direct staff to go back to modify the Fire Sprinkler Ordinance,
to make it optional to mandate that builders offer that amenity and that we investigate the size for location of structures,
i.e., on hillsides that should have sprinklers, and that we conduct the appropriate hearing to that effect. Motion carried
3-2 (Alexander, Curatalo voted no).
Jack Lam, City Manager, added that staff has made a good faith effort to work with the BIA and that he has received
reports from the staff whenever the City and the BIA have met.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he hoped that staff would have ideas to mitigate the issues.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the main issue is the "0" cost factor. He stated the staff has never stated they would not
meet with the BIA.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C 1. John Lyons stated that he did not agree with this action, and felt the City now will need more fire stations.
C2. Russ Blewitt stated the BIA is constantly making homes safer.
D. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Willjams to adjourn to executive session to discuss property negotiations
per Government Code 54956.8 located at the southwest comer of Foothill Blvd. and Rochester Avenue; Valley Baseball
and Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, negotiating parties, regarding terms of payment. Executive session would
adjourn to Wednesday, June 21, 1995, 4:30 p.m. to meet at City Hall and then go to the North Town neighborhood for
a tour. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. No action was taken in executive session.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
I
I
·
I
·
I
·
I
·
·
·
·
·
·
I
·
·
I
It
·
I
·
I
l
·
·
I
·
I
·
·
I
I
·
·
·
·
I
I
·
·
·
I
I
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
I
·
·
·
·
·
I
·
I
·
I
·
I
·
I
·
I
·
I
e
I
I
I
·
I
I
I
I
·
I
·
·
I
·
I
I
·
I
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
I
·
·
·
·
I
·
·
I
·
·
·
·
I
I
·
·
·
·
·
I
·
Z~ vZ Z ~
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I
·
· ·
Zl ·
· ·
I~1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
· ·
I ·
I ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· I
I ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
I~1
· ·
I~1
· ·
· I
I ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
I I
I ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· I
· ·
·
· ·
I ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
I ·
I~1
·
· ·
I~1
· ·
2'
m~
~J
me
· · · · ·
~,~
I ~
%
Z
,ll,,,.I
.s- ·
:Pt,l.,~
.J
· I
I I
· ·
I ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
·
l
·
· ·
o* ·
41 I
· I
I~1
I~1
~1~1
%1 ·
~1~1
Ol 3l
I I
, · ·
~1 ·
~1 ·
~1 I
QI I
I ·
ZI I
~! I
~1 I
I~1
IZI
· I
I~1
I~1
· I
· ·
· I
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
·
· ·
I I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
I I
I~1
I~1
I~1
I~1
I~1
· ·
Ikl
· ·
I I
· ·
I ·
· ·
· I
I ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· I
· I
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· I
· I
· ·
· I
I I
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
I~1
IZl
I~1
I~1
I~1
I~1
· ·
- ~ ......
Z
(:2
~r2
..~
· - ~.~
~-~
tu · ·
I1,-I
% I I
f.el el
olll
e
~u $
i=..
I I
I
I
I
I
I
1
e
I
f
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
By:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Cotmcil
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O3/eil, City Engineer
Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector
APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS FROM FUND BALANCE AND AUTHORIZE
THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF BASE LINE ROAD TEMPORARY WIDENING AND
REHABILITATION, FROM DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO VICTORIA PARK LANE,
TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUND
ACCOUNT NO. 224637-9306 AND S.B. 140 FUND, ACCOUNT NO. 35-4637-9306.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate funds from fund balances of the Transportation
Systems Development Fund and the S.B. 140 Fund in the amounts $340,000.00 and $50,000.00,
respectively, to be placed into Account Nmbers 22-4637-9306 and 35-4637-9306, respectively. Also,
it is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of Base Line
Road Temporary Widening and Rehabilitation, from Day Creek Charmel to Victoria Park Lane, and
approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to aclv,~'tis~ the "Notice Inviting Bids."
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The project was initially included in the FY 94/95 budget Utility delays prevented staff from completing
the plans and specifications. The subject project plans and specifications have now been completed by
staff and approved by the City En~neer. The Engineer's estimate was $275,000. Legal advertising is
scheduled for July 12 and July 19, 1995, with the bid opening scheduled for Tuesday, August 1, 1995 at
2:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
WJO:MDL:dlw
~Anachment
.j
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BASE LINE
ROAD TEMPORARY WIDENING AND REHABILITATION,
FROM DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO VICTORIA PARK LANE,
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN SkID CITY AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO
RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the
construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "The
Construction of Base Line Road Temporary Widening and Rehabilitation, from Day Creek Channel
to Victoria Park Lane".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified
in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITI'NG SEAI.ED RIDS OR PROPOSAI.S"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County,
California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on August 1, 1995, sealed bids or proposals for the
"The Construction of Base Line Road Temporary Widening and Rehabilitation, from Day Creek
Channel to Victoria Park Lane" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and reed in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City ofRancho Cucamonga,
California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "Base Line Road Temporary Widening and
Rehabilitation, from Day Creek Channel to Victoria Park Lane".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in' the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rote of per diem wages
for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Dh'ector of the Department of industrial Relations
of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk
of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and
are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of
such determinations to be posted at the job site.
/I
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman,
or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or
mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rote of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work
done under the attached contract, by him or by any subconWactor under him, in violation of the pro-
visions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as mended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the
public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate
of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in
the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to joumeymen in such cases shall not be
less than one to five except:
When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee
has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of
certificate, or
When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,
or
When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all
of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration
of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements
may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its
branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and
be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract,
by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each
calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more
than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay Iravel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the
work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cask cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's
bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an mount equal to at least ten percent (10%
of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the
same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check,
certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount
of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest
bidder.
The mount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said
work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in
an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given
to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the
work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and
the Con .tnctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance
covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between
him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any
and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract;
including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class
"LICENSE" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business
and Professions Code, Section 7000 el. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section
7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date,
and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being
provided is true and correct
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City
Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of
$35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE) is nonrefundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed
when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional
nonreimbursable payment of $ 15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and
overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth
in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contmctor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (,performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 5th day of July, 1995.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
this 5th day of July, 1995.
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: July 12 and July 19, 1995
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I ./~-,;
EXTENSION OF COMCAST CABLE T.V. FRANCHISE
RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of Resolution No. 91-012U extending Comcasrs Franchise License for 90 days.
BACKGROUND
The City staff would appreciate the opportunity to continue with the negotiations with Comcast to insure that
even/opportunity has been made available to Comcast to obtain a Franchise License.
SM:jls
Attachment
/5
RESOLUTION NO. 91-012U
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON
EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
WHEREAS, the Franchise License granted to Comcast Cable T.V. by the County of San
Bernardino and grandfathered into the City of Rancho Cucamonga will expire on July 15, 1995; and
WHEREAS, nego'daljons am ongoing between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Comcast
Cable T.V.; and
WHEREAS, all terms and conditions of the current license will continue the same.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Coundl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve
to extend the Franchise License for 90 days after the expiration of the current County of San Bernardino
License.
f
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~Neil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
SUMMARY VACATIONS OF PORTIONS OF VARIOUS EXCESS CITY
RIGHTS-OF-WAY LOCATED ON 24TH STREET, 25TH STREET AND
CENTER AVENUE AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DR 95-03, LOCATED WITHIN THE
NORTHTOWN AREA ALONG 24TH STREET, 25TH STREET AND
HUMBOLDT AVENUE, EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY
NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
RRCOMM1;'.NDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the summary
vacations of portions of various excess City fights-of-way, located on 24th Street, 25th Street and
Center Avenue, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign
said resolutions and to cause said vacations to record.
BACKGROLrNBIANAI .YSIg
DR 95-03, located within the Northtown area along 24th Street, 25th Street and Humboldt Avenue,
east of Hermosa Avenue, in the Low Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission
on March 8, 1995. This project is for the construction of single-family residences on 12 infill lots.
The Redevelopment Agency is providing the guarantee for the completion of the off-site street
improvements fronting the 12 infill lots in the following amounts:
Faithrid Performance Bond:
Labor and Materials Bond:
$24,200.00
$12,100.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DR 95-03
July 5, 1995
Page 2
The Developer, Northtown Housing Development Corporation, is requesting that the City vacate
portions of various excess rights-of-way along 24th Street, 25th Street and Center Avenue (see Map
V-134 and Exhibits "A-I" through "A-6" and "B-I" through B-6" respectively) The original North
Cucamonga Map recorded in April 1887 provided 80-feet wide street dedications for said streets
while the City standard street dedication for local streets is 60 feet wide. The Planning Commission
found the vacations to be consistent with the General Plan.
Section 8334a of the Streets and Highways Code states that local agencies may summarily vacate
(by resolution) an excess right-of-way of a street which is no longer required for street and related
purposes.
A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent
and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O~Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:sd
Attachment
KESOLUnON NO. C ,tS" / 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 FOR DR 95-03
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafcer
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional terntory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached herew and incorporate! herein by this referenced to th~
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CrYY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals axe all true and correct
SECTION 7: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all futun proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the terntory annexed hereunder.
/7
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. 1 AND 2
4 ~'A.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STREET I.IGHTS:
Dist. 5800L
S1
s2 4
l .ANDSCAPING:
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: DR 95-03
NUMBER OF LAMPS
16.000I. 22.0001.
Community
Equestrian
Trail Turf
Dist. D,G,S,F, S,F,
L1
27.500I,
Non-Turf
S.F.
Trees
Ea.
19
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By Dis~ct
Parcel DU S 1 S2 L 1
N/A 12 12 12 12
7/5/95
RESOLUTION NO.
q.5-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY
ORDERING THE VACATIONS OF PORTIONS OF VARIOUS
EXCESS RIGHTS-OF-WAY LOCATED ON 24TH STREET, 25TH
STREET AND CENTER AVENUE
WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8334a, of the Streets and Highway Code, the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate portions of street
easements as excess fights-of-way hereinafter more particularly described; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that said street easements are
no longer required for street or highway purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its
order vacating those portions of street easements as excess rights-of-way on Map V- 134, on file in
the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in
legal descriptions and sketches which are attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A-1" through "A-6" and
"B-1" through "B-6" respectively, and by references made parts thereof.
SECTION ?: That the subject vacations shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions,
if any, for existing utilities on record.
SECTION 3: That from and after the date this resolution is recorded, said portions of excess
rights-of-way located on 241h Street, 251h Street and Center Avenue no longer constitute as street
easements.
SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be
recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bemardino County, California.
SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution,
and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
I
t;n'x' OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
EtG~ntG DIVI210N
MAA~ V-
N
A.P.N. 209-10~-18
EXHIBIT
Legal Description
For
The Vacation of 24th Street
That portion of 24th Street adjoining Lot 16, of Block 59 and that portion o[
2~th Street adjoining the westerly 1/2 of a 20.00 foot wide alley adjacent and
east of said Lot l& of Block 59 of North Cucamonga, in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, recorded in Book 4
of Naps, Page 8, in the office of the Recorder of said County, more
particularly described as follows:
The northerly lO.OO feet of 2~th Street adjoining said Lot l& and the
westerly 1/2 of said alley bound on the west by the southerly
prolongation of the westerly line of said Lot 2~ and bound on the east
by the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of the westerly
of said alley.
A.P.N. 209-104-18
(L~'r
EXHIBIT 'B'- I
10.00'--- ---
WES1TRt.YLN[
tOT 14
SOU'-tERLY UNE LOT 14
24th
b
EASTERLY LINE OF WESiEm,Y 1/2
OFALLEY
1
STREET
V/J,: SHALL ACCOMPANY
_ LEGAL .DESCRIPTION..
A.P.R. 209-111-0&
KXI~IBIT 'A"-2
Legal Description
For
The Vacation of 2~th Street
That portion of 26th Street adjoinin8 Lot 15 of Block 61 of North Cucamonga,
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, recorded in Book & of Maps, Page 8, in the office of the Recorder
of said County, more particularly described as follows:
The southerly 10.00 feet of 2~th Street bound on the west by the
northerly projection of the westerly line of said Lot 15, and bound on
the east by the northerly projection of the easterly line of said Lot
15.
A.P.N. 209-111-04
EXHIBIT
24th
STREET
F_ASTE]~Y UNE LOT 15
WF..:ilt.,'II.Y UNE LOT 15 -
.. A.P.N. 209-111-04
EXHIBIT "A"o ~
Legal Description
For
The Vacation of 26th Street
That portion of 24th Street adjoining Lot 13 of Block 61 of North Cucamonga,
in the City of Rancho CucasonBa, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, recorded in Book 4 of Naps, Page 8, in the office of the Recorder
of said County, sore particularly described as follows:
The southerly
northerly
the east
13.
10.00 feet of 24th Street bound on the west by the
projection of the westerly line of said Lot 13, and bound on
A~r'.N. 2~-I 11-04
(Lrr er?
EXHIBIT 'B'- ~
i
24th
STREET
](,AgEA
t.Y ~HE: tOT 13
I
LINE LOT 13
13
F_.ASTERLY UNE LOT 13
I
d, el'r
-"' Me. ~9223 ' ~] ..................................
¢k~~,~,Vd,C~~~~,f MAP SHALL ACCOMPANY
A.P.N. 209-102-19
EXHIBIT 'A'- 4
Legal Description
For
The Vacation of 26th Street
That portion of 26th Street adJoinir~ Lot 16 of Block 60 o[ North Cucamonga,
in the City of Rancho Cucasor~a, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, recorded in Book & of ~aps, Page 8, in the office of the Recorder
of said County, more particularly described as follows:
The northerly 10.O0 feet of 24th Street adJoinir~ said Lot 14, bound on
the west by the southerly prolongation o~ the westerly line of said Lot
14, and bound on the east by the southerly prolor~ation of the easterly
line of said Lot
A~P.N. 209-102-19
EXHIBIT "B'- 4
1" ,- 40'
It
LINE LOT 14
b
14
1]
F,A.~iE.R1,Y JNE LOT 1~
jSOnY LINE LOT 14
T
24th STREET
r/ill,it'
HAP SHALL ACCOHPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A.P.N. 209-104-61
EIUHBZT
Legal Description
For
The Vacation of 26th Street and Center Avenue
That portion of 2&th and Center Avenue adjoining Lots 1, 2, 3, and 6 excepting
therefrom the westerly 61.00 feet of said Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Block 59 of
North Cucamon~a, in the City of Rancho Cucasonga, County of San Bernardino,
State of California, recorded in Book 6 of Hops, Page 8 in records in the
office of the Recorder of said County, sore particularly described as follows:
Parcel A
A strip of land 10.00 feet in width sore particularly described as follows:
The northerly 10.00 feet of 26th Street adjoining said Lot 1 bound on
the west by the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of the
westerly 61.00 feet of said Lot 1, and bound on the east by the
southerly prolongation of the easterly line of said Lot 1.
Parcel B
A strip of land 10.00 feet in width sore particularly described as follows:
The westerly 10.00 feet of Center Avenue adjoining said Lots 1, 2, 3 and
6 bound on the north by the easterly prolongation of the northerly line
of said Lot &, and bound on the south by the easterly prolongation of
the southerly line of said Lot 1.
Parcel C
That portion of 24th Street and Center Avenue more particularly described as
follows:
Begirmin~ at the southeast corner of said Lot l; ~ easterly along
the easterly prolongation o~ the southerly line of said Lot I a distance
of 10.00 feet Sore or less to a point of int~reeetiontitb a line drawn
parallel and 10.00 feet easterly (~easufed it tight an~les) with the
easterly line of said Lots l, 2, ] and &; ~ Soatbbrly alon~ said
parallel line a dictate 0f 2.00 E~t; ~ ]outheestjfly to a point
of intersection With a lit~ dfaea patdll&l tith and 10.00 ~eet
southerly, s~asttred at fight an~l&] to tb] loathfly lifts o~ ~aid Lot 1,
and a line draw parallbl tith afki 2.00 ~&t ~a,t~tly, aasured at right
ar~les to the easterly lt~s of ]aid tots 1, 2, J, a~d &: ~ easterly
LXJlFILL
'i
along said line drawn parallel to the southerly line of said Lot l, a
distance of 2.00 ~eet to the poin~ of intersection eith the sott~herly
projection of the easterly line of said Lo~ 1, 2, 3 and ~; TI~e(2
northerly along said Prolon~atio~ a distance of 10 O0 ~ee~ tori or less
to the POINT OF B~CII~IDM. ·
~IIFZM,
A.P.N. 209-102-31
KXI!IBIT *A*- 6
Legal Description
For
The Vacation of 25th Street
That portion of 25th Street adjoinin8 the northerly 1/2 of Lots 21 and 23 of
Block 60 of North CucamonSa, in the City of Rancho CucamonSa, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, recorded in Book & of Naps, Page 8, in the
office of the Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows:
The southerly 10.00 feet of said 25th Street bound on the east by the
northerly projection of the easterly line o~ said Lot 21 and bound on
the west by the northerly projection of the westerly line of said Lot
23.
Exceptin8 therefrom the westerly a. OO feet of said southerly lO.OO feet
of said 25th Street.
Also exceptin8 therefrom thet portion described as follows:
Beginnin8 at a point of intersection of the northerly line of said Lot
23 with a line drawn parallel and &.O0 feet ~asterly leaanted at right
anSles to the westerly line of said Lot 25; Ti~ieCR northerly alor~ the
northerly projection of said parallel lins sk distance of lO.OO feet more
or less to a point on the northerly line of the southerly 10.00 feet of
said 25th Street; ttiil]~i easterly alon8 said lins ~ distance of 10.00
feet; ~ southwesterly a distance of 1&.14 feet ~ore or less to the
A.P.N..209-102-31
( Le,,t. ~-)
EXHIBIT "B'- 6
WESTELY UHE
LOt ~3~
,, ¢o'
I
25th
o V&ckT1E, O o
~ -,,.. 0'
._/
P.o.e. k- >;,r,,
STREET
b
I
I
NOF~HE~LY LII
EASTE/~Y
LOT 21
E LOTS 21 8c 23
HAP SHALL ACCOMPANY
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
STAFF REPORT
July 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~eil, City Engineer
Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 95-4)9, LOCATED ON
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOURTH STREET 'AND ARCHIBALD
AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY FRITO LAY, INC.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions appmving DR 95-09
improvement agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B and Sweet Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the
Mayor and the .City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS
DR 95-09, located on the northeast comer of Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue, in the
General Industrial Designation (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was appmved
by the Planning Commission on May 10, 1995. This project is for the construction of a
254,607 square foot warehouse addition, an 8,190 square foot maintenance building and a
1,200 square foot lunchroom addition to an existing manufacturing facility.
The Developer, Frito Lay, Inc., has submitted an improvement agreement and improvement
securities to guarantee the consm~tion of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond:
Labor and Materials Bond:
$39,258.00
$19,629.00
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's office.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DR 95-09
July 5, 1995
Page 2
A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's
office.
Respectfully Submitted,
4---,rWilliam J. O~Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BRH:sd
Attachments
RESOLU ON NO.- / D G,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 95-09
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on July 5, 1995, by Frito Lay, Inc., as developer,
for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located northeast comer of Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement
and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real
property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 95-09; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient
Improvement Securities, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor
is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is
authorized to attest thereto; and
That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to
approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 95-09
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hemto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the ownen of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance DisUict, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the terntory annexed hereunder.
EXHIBIT 'A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. DISTRICT NO. ~ 19
91'REET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIBTRICT NO. I AND 6
LiJ
Z
LEGEND
)~ STREET LIGHT 8 EA
(~) STREET TREE 36 EA.
:,~ EXIStiNG STREET UGHT
,.~ EXISTING STREET TREE
4 TH STREET
CITYOFRANCHOCUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
D~ 95- OY
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist.
S1
S6
l ,ANDSCAPING:
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: DR 95-09
NUMBER OF LAMPS
16.000I. 27.000I,
8
Community
Equestrian
Trail Tuff Non-Tuff
Dist. D.G.S.F. S.F. S.F.
L3B
27.500I,
Trees
18' + 36= 54
* Existing items installed with original project. This DR will add 8 street lights and 36 street trees.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
DU or
Parcel Acres
N/A 35.94
Assessment U~ts
Fly District"
S1 S6 L3B
71.88 35.94 35.94
7/5/95
4/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
T~.
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AGREEMENTS WITH THE
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL FOR PARTICIPATION IN TRAINING
PROGRAMS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution. This resolution
would allow our Police Department to participate in training programs conducted by
the California Highway Patrol.
BACKGROUND
A recent requirement by the State of California requires local agencies that wish to
participate in training programs offered by the California Highway Patrol to enter
into a training agreement. Our Police Department sends many individuals to these
training programs each year.
The attached resolution authorizes the City to enter into these training agreements.
Also, the City Manager is authorized to sign these agreements as they come up.
This resolution will allow our officers to receive the latest training offered by the
California Highway Patrol. This training helps our officers perform their jobs better
and improves our ability to provide quality public safety services. For these reasons,
staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution.
Res ctfully Submitted,
Duane A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
/dab
.j
A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AGREEMENTS
BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DEPARTMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL,
AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
IN TRAINING PROGRAMS ADMINISTERED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of California Highway
Patrol requires written training agreements from any agency participating in
their training programs; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
desires from time to time to participate in certain training programs
sponsored and administered by the Department of California Highway Patrol.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga that the City manager or Designee is hereby authorized
and directed to sign such training agreements with the State of California,
department of California Highway Patrol.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 5, 1995
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council,
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration To Approve A~reement To Co-Sponsor Concerts With Acts
Concert (CO 95- 024) at Rancho Cucamone~a's Epicenter
RECOMMENDATION
City Council consider approval of agreement to cosponsor concerts with Acts Concert at
Rancho Cucamonga's Epicenter.
BACKGROUND
Acts Concert had booked a number of concerts with a co-producer for fiscal year 95/96. The
Allman Brothers and Chicago bands were booked and confirmed however, due to unforeseen
circumstances Acts Concert's co-producer did not complete the co-production of the Allman
Brothers and Chicago Bands.
Staff believes that the community would enjoy entertainment of this caliber. While the Allman
Brothers are no longer available for this year, Chicago is still available on September 12, 1995. If
City Council approve the agreement with Acts Concert then Acts will confirm reservation of
Chicago for September 12, 1995, and seek a replacement act for the Allman Brothers. Acts
Concert has informed us that if a major date conflict should arise the concerts can be
rescheduled.
RON B~RKE
25 years music industry; an accomplished musician with keyboards,
guitar and horn; ~riter, producer, movie soundtrack; studio
musician. Ron has played keyboards for 20 years, and has toured
with many bands in the ~O's, ~0's, and 80's. ~e can play any
style of music - from rock and roll to jazz. Ron has worked on
movie soundtracks and rock and roll videos - producing and
playing on them. We has worked with the following recording
studios: wally Heider, ~aji Sound, Ocean Sound, Gold Star, !AM
Studio, Record ?!ant, Annex Studios, TTG Studio, Sunset Sound,
Paradise Studios, Clover Studios, and Larabee Sound Studios.
Ron has promoted concerts and' done weekly bookings for clubs in
the Los Angeles area. Star Wes~ Productions and Bac~ Lot Pro-
ductions put on shows with: Edgar and Johnny Winter, Heart,
~esterday and Today, Ric~ Derringer, ToM Petty, Savoy Brown, Van
Halen, Blac~ Oa~ Arkansas, Paul Butterfield Blues Band, Tubes,
Canned Heat, Lee Michaels, Mac Davis, Super Tramp, Robin Ford,
Runaways, ~at Senatar, F!o ~ Eddie, Outlaws, B.B.King, Charlie
Musselwhite, Dave ~ason, Janis joplin, Alice Cooper, and
Albert King.
Ron has also recorded and played with his own bands: Dark
Horse, Zebra, Diggers Inc., Warrior, and Riff Raff. ~e was
the owner of Take One Recording, Burbank, California, and
Backstage Film and Rehearsal Sound Stage in North Hollywood.
Ron has gold albums and double platinum albums from his associ-
ation ~ith ~reat artists and musicians. ~e has worked with:
~ham, ~enny Loggins, Jeff Lorber, Rod Stewart, Crosby Stills ~
Nash, ?~ister Mister, Toto, Doobie Brothers, joe Cocker, jimmy
Page/Led Zeppelin, Roy Orbison, Allman Brothers, Was Not Was,
Oingo Foingo, van Halen, johnny ~{inter, Rick Derringer, Tom
Petty, Cheap Trick, Billy idol, Suns and Roses, Poison, Yngwie
Maimsteem, Fleetwood Mac, Rippingtons, Russ Freeman, jetmaine
jackson, Richard Marx, Ziggy Mar!ey, Brenda Russell, Jackson
Browne, Peter Fonda, Bobby Carradine, Steppenwolf, George
Clinton, Steve Miller, Wasp, Lee Ritenhour, jeffrey Osborn,
Heart, Hiroshima, Edgar Winter, juice Newton, Savoy Brown,
Santana, jason Bonam, Russ Tall, Andy Taylor, Duran Duran,
Bruce Hornsby and the Range.
Ron also has done film and soundtrack work for CBS/NBC movies
of the week: "Naked Lie" and "Prize Pulitzer" Radio: Wave
94.7, ELXS 97.1 live radio show, Classic Call, was broadcast
from ?~ke One Recording weekly, and numerous Disney and Fox
projects, plus on-site live recordings with remote trucks.
Ron is founder of Acts Multimedia Productions, which includes:
Acts Concerts, Acts Across America cable television show (which
~il! be a direct marketing record company), and soon to be film
division. Acts is a company with innovative ideas that will
shape Zhe future of this multimedia generation.
VIC'~OR PERROTTI
25 years music industry. Victor has the greatest attitude:
could sell snow to Eskimos, always optimistic, a true
promotion man. His Italian ancestry makes him a lovable,
trustworthy, kind person you want to be around - work or
play. Victor has worked with the biggest and the best, and
definitely contributed to their success.
National Promotion Director'- Polygram, United Artists,
20th Century Fox
Victor is responsible for many people. The artist is in his
hands as Victor promotes his product from finished production
to radio station air play to national recognition on music
charts'. Victor does this well. His 35 gold records i~
20 years speak of success' that many would love to have.
In all this, Victor is a regular, caring person who would
give you anything you needed--except when it comes to golf.
He would have surely been a pro golfer if he wasn't in the
music business. He still is a par golfer. This year he
promoted his first golf championship in Phoenix to raise
money for a school gymnasium.
victor has his own independent promotion company, Rainbow
Promotions. His capacity at Acts is the record company;
new direction--direct marketing record company plus film,
video, and motion picture promotion.
People like victor keep me in the highly competitive music
industry. He makes it fun.
These are just some of the people Victor has worked with:
Russ Regan - President, 20th Century Fox, Ben Scotti -
Scotti Brothers Entertainment, Harold Burkeman - Vice-President,
MGM and owner - Music Express, ~ike .3ecce - vice-President,
Polygram, Fred Manoe - President, Select Records, Dicky Klein -
Vice-President, Atlantic/Polygram, Vic Faraci - Atlantic
Records, Gunther Henslet - CEO, Polygram, Russ Thyret -
Warner Brothers, Susan Manoe - Donna Summers, joe McCraken -
Word Records, 5th Dimension, Kid & Play, Paul ~nka, ~ollies,
james Brown, Batty White, Tina Turner, Johnny Guitar Watson,
Electric Light Orchestra, and Russ Taff.
PAGE
25 years music industry; concert promotion and sales.
jimmy produced shows for the biggest and best concert
company - Concerts West, Dallas, Texas. In the 60's and
7O's, Concerts West set the standard that many companies and
promoters use today. One of it's founders just hooked the
United States leg of the Eagles tour. This national concert
promotion company promoted groups and individuals such as
Elyis Presley, Led Zeppelin, The Rolling Stones, Jimmy Handfix,
Joe Cocker, Elton John, Nell Diamond, Rod Stewart, Deep' Purple,
Bread, Santana, Jefferson Airplane, and The Moody Blues.
After this', Jimmy became:
National Sales Director and Vice-President Sales and
Promotions, Showco', rn~'~, Dallas, Texas-.
This company handled production for approximately I500
concerts per year. Showco provided sound reinforcement,
stage lighting, staging, design, crews, trucking, crew
transportation, tour advancing, hotel reservation, tour
recording and tour management. Some of the artists who
used Showco exclusively included: Elvis Presley, The
Rolling Stones, The Who, Paul McCartney and Wings,
Joni Mitchell, ZZ Top, Black Sabbath, Jackson Browne,
Leon Russell, Grand Funk Railroad, Van Morrison,
A1 Jarreau, Willie Nelson, ~enny Rogers, Aerosmith,
The Carpenters, Led Zeppelin, Frank Sinatra, Santana,
Bette Midler, Uriah Heap, The Guess Who, Bread, Toto,
The Doobie Brothers, Black Oak Arkansas, Elton john,
Paul Simon, The Beach Boys, Chicago, Dolly Parton,
Average White Band, War, Kris Kristofferson, Rita
Coolidge, joe Cocker, Eric Clapton, Three Dog Night,
Stevie Wonder, The Osmonds, The jackson Five, Peter
Frampton, and Little Feat.
vice-President, Showco Concerts, Dallas Texas.
This was a concert promotion company. Some of the
concerts promoted included: Linda Ronstadt, James
Taylor, Jackson Browne, Earth Wind & Fire, A1 Jarreau,
Little Feat, Parliment Funkade!ic, Billy Joel, Willie
Nelson, ZZ Top, Weather Report and Chick Corea.
~eile with Showco, promoted many benefit concerts for
the Children's Arts & Ideas Foundation with James
Taylor, Linda Rondstadt, Jackson Browne and Art
Garfunkel. Showco, Inc. supplied production services
for many benefit concerts, i.e. March of Dimes, United
Way, Muscular Dystrophy Association, and others.
President/Owner/Partner, Eaton Page Productions, Dallas, Texas.
This was a concert promotion company. Promoter of
approximately 300 concerts in Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana,
New Mexico, Arkansas, Arizona, California, ~ansas, and
Nebraska. Talent promoted included: ZZ Top, James
Taylor, Linda Ronstadt, Andrew Gold, Little Feat,
Weather Report, Earth Wind & Fire, Denise Williams,
Teddy Pandergrass, Thelma Houston, Parliment Funkadelic,
A1 Jarreau, Chic~ Corea, Black Sabbath, Van Morrison,
Billy Joel, Van ~alen, ~ris Kristofferson, Rita Coolidge,
George Benson, Charlie Daniels, Dire Straits, Point
Blan~, Billy Thorpe, Fog Hat, Johnny and Edgar Winter,
Allman Brothers, Wet Willie, Marshall Tucker, Santana,
Toto, The Beach Boys, Chuc~ Mangione, David Bowie,
Gil-Scott Heron, ~iss, Alice Cooper, George Carlin, and
Hank Williams, Jr.
?
Owner/Partner, The Palladiu= of Dallas.
Owned and operated The Palladium', a I000 seat showcase
nightclub. Talent showcased included: Todd Rundgren,
Tina Turner, Count Basie, Charlie Rich, Willie Nelson,
Jerry Jeff Walker, George Benson, Robert Klein, Dire
Straits, A! jarreau, Toto, Charlie. Daniels, Tom Waites,
Emmy Lou Harris, Roseann Cash, Rodhey Crowell, Sourher,
Chuck Hanglone, Buddy Rich, Stanley Clark, Billman
Furray Bank, Robert Palmet, George Strait, The Police,
Stevie Ray Vaughn, The Fabulous Thunderbirds, Boomtown
Rats, John Cougar Me!!ancamp, Asleep At The Wheel,
johnny Paycheck, Little joe and Robin Williams.
Benefits at The Palladium include:
- Chi!dren's Arts & ideas - Willie Nelson
- Western Police Athletic League Boxing Tournament
- Dallas ?olice Athletic League Boxing Tournament
- Texas Music Awards
- Buddy Music Awards
jimmy has been involved in so many productions, that to list
them all would require a notebook. These listed are just a
small part of his career, thus far.
Jimmy is a qualified concert promoter and concert production
manager. His knowledge of booking acts, the things it takes
to get the show to the venue, the power and capacity of each
part - sound, lighting, staging - give him a huge advantage
over other people who book concerts.
Jimmy has many awards for shows, gold records, live concert
recordings, videos and television concerts which he was part of.
~e is ~ell-kno~n in the industry and respected. This is the
reason Acts was a perfec~ place for him. The multimedia
production overlap of [ilm, concert, video and live shovs
fit right in with his many experiences. Jimmy is a real
asset to Acts and ~i!l ~ork in all areas of the business.
ACTS MULTIMEDIA PRODUCTIONS
Acts Multimedia Productions produces film, video,
records and music concerts in the entertainment industry.
Acts Concerts, the division which deals with concert
promotion and production, boo~s shows across the United
States. we book artists in amphitheatres, arenas, convention
centers, baseball stadiums, county fairs, college campuses,
and other venues which desire entertainment.
We offer a contract booking service for cities which
have venues that can be multi-use facilities. in this way,
we can help a city/city manager bring in much desired revenue
to their expanding community. Entertainment is one way to
increase existing funds-while providing a service.
~len Acts Concerts is contracted to do a show, these
are some of the following considerations:
budget/working capital
artist desired: marketability, aveliability, artist
fee
accessing the venue: size, type, seating capacity,
V!P seating, staging, sound, lights
security, crowd control, parking, local police
traffic control and perimeter security
event sponsors
advertising: radio, television, newspaper, press
releases
ticket agents
concessions and souvenirs
V!P credentials and artist/crew credentials
Acts' company executives plus technical engineers have
over !00 years of combined experience. Our sources and
industry contacts know the current value of popular artists.
The knowledge and .quality of our experience ~uar~ntees your
money will be well spent.
If Acts Concerts can be of service to your city or
venue, or if you have questions concerning avenue and
concert you would Ii~e to promote, please ~ive us a call.
We would be glad to assist you. Call Ron Burke or Jimmy
Page at (909)336-1565, FAX (909)337-2618.
lcts' legal representation is: Alfred Schlesinger,
?Sotown Building, ~2~5 Sunset Blvd., Suite 1214, Hollywood,
California 90028, (2!7)87i-!818, FAX (213)464-7~39.
THIS IS A PARTIAL LIST OF ARTISTS WE ~{AVE HAD THE
PLEASURE OF WORKING WITH DURING OUR JOINT CaREFRS.
'jham Kenny Loggins
Jeff Lorber Rod Stewart
Crosby, Stills ~ Nash Mister Mister
Toto Doobie ~rothers
Joe Cocker jimmy Page/Led Zeppelin
Roy Orbison Allman Brothers
Was ~ot Was Oingo Boingo
Van Helen johnny Winter
Rice Derringer Tom Fatty
Cheap Trice Billy idol
Guns and Roses Yngwie Maimsteem
Poison Fleetwood Mac
Jermaine jackson ' Richard Marx
~iggy Mar!ey Brenda Russell
jackson Browne Feter Fonda
Bobby Carrydine Steppenwolf
George Clinton Steve Miller
Wasp Rippingtons/Russ Freeman
Weather Report Hiroshima
Lee Ritenhour Chick Corea
jeffrey Osborn Edgar Winter
Heart Juice Yewton
Savoy Brown Santana
Jason Bonam Russ Taff
Andy Taylor Duran Duran
Elyis Froslay Rolling Stones
The ~qho Paul !.TcCartnev and Wings
ZZ Too van ~[orrison
~i!lie Nelson ~enny ~ogers
Aercsmith E!ton John
Paul Simon 3each Boys
Chicago Dolly Patton
Earth, ~ind & Fire Billy joel
james Taylor Charlie Denials
jerry Jeff Walker Emmy Lou Harris
Rosanne Cash George Strait
Stevie Ray Vaughn .iohn Cougar ~el!encamD
Marshall Tucker Band Little Feat
Bruce ~ornsby Han~ Williams, jr.
Linda Ronstadt Electric Light Orchestra
5th Dimension Tina Turner
james ~rown Barry White
Paul Anka Hollies
Johnny Guitar Watson Kid ~ Play
CBS/NBC/Disney - Feature Films
Live radio shows: KLXS 97.I and The Wave 94.7
DATE:
TO:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
July 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager
BY.'
Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF
SAN BERNARDINO FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTY'S HOME CONSORTIUM.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Cooperation Agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute the documents.
BACKGROUND
The Congress of the United States enacted the Cranston Gonzales National Affordable Housing
Act. Title II of the Act creates the "HOME" program, which provides funds to state and local
government for acquisition, rehabilitation, and new construction of affordable housing and
tenant-based rental assistance. The Act allows local governments to form consortia for the
purpose of receiving and administering HOME funds and programs.
At the direction of the Housing Sub-CommiRee, staff has been investigating the County of San
Bernardino's Home Consorrium.
ANALYSIS
The County of San' Bernardino has proposed a HOME Consortium with the dries of Rialto,
Redlands, and Rancho Cucamonga, in order to increase the allocation received under the
Federal HOME program by allowing the population of these cities to be used in the calculation
of the County's allocation.
Under the terms of this program, ~ County will make available its existing HOME programs
(i.e. first-time homebuyer's assistance, rehabilitation loans/grants, rental assistance, etc.) to the
participating cities. Additionally, the dties will receive an allocation of HOME funds to be
used for locally created housing programs. The HOME funds allocation to the cities will require
matching local funds; however, existing City and Agency programs already in use in Rancho
Cucamonga will qualify for that match.
There is no cost to the City or Redevelopment Agency for inclusion in the program.
~D. Daniels
Redevelopment Manager
f
CITY OF KANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF RF, PORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
By:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~Neil, City Engineer
Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector
AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR
CALAVERAS STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM ARROW ROUTE TO NINTH
STREET, FOR THE AMOUNT OF $160,938.80 ($146,328.00 PLUS 10%
CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM CDBG ACCOUNT NO. 28-4637-9115 TO
GENTRY BROTHERS
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award authorize for execution the contract for Calaveras Street
Improvements, form Arrow Route to Ninth Street, to the lowest responsive bidder Gentry Brothers for the
amount of $160,938.80($146,328.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from CDBG Account No. 28-
4637-9115
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council actibn, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 20, 1995, for the subject
project. Gentry Brothers is the apparent lowest biddy, with a bid mount of $146,328.00 (see attached bid
summary). The Engineer's estimat~ was $182,000.00. Staff has r~viewed all bids received and found them
to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background
investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Respectfully submitted,
xJx, William J Oq',Ieil
City Engineer
WJO:MDL:dlw
Attachment
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~eil, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13759,
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE SOUTH OF VICTORIA
STREET, SUBMITTED BY FU MAI LIMITED
RECOMMEN1}ATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement
extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANAl .YSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the consm~ction of the public
improvements for Tract 13759 were approved by the City Council on January 21, 1993, in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $1,326,000.
Labor and Material Bond: $ 663,000.
The developer, Fu Mai Limited, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement
agreement due to the economic situation. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available
in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully Submitted,
WJO:SMG:dlw
Attachment
FORMOSA INVESTMENTS & DEVELOPMENTS
FU MAI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
801 S. Garfield Ave. Suite 200
Alhambra, CA 91801
U.S.A.
Tel 818-289-0223
Fax 818-289-4806
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729
STEVE M. GILL[LAND
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR II
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
ENGINEERING DIVISION.
SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF IMPROVEMENT FOR TRACT 13759
APRIL 17, 1995
DEAR SIR.:
THANKS YOUR LETTER DATE OF APRIL 13. 1995. REGARDING THE TRACT 13759. AS DEVELOPER, WE
ARE STILL WORK ON FEASIBILITY STUDY ON THE INVESTMENT PLAN. AT THIS MONMENT IS NOT A
RIGHT TIME TO DEVELOPER BECAUSE THE ECONOMIC. PLEASE TO EXTENSION ONE MORE YEAR.
THANKS.
BEST REGARD
FU MIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
GARRY CHEN
PRESIDENT
F(DRMOSA
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13759
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on July 5, 1995, by Fu Mai Limited
as developer, for the improvement of public fight-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located west side of Haven Avenue south of Victoria Street; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said Tract 13759; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by
good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement
Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and
the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement
Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest
thereto.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF RF PORT
July 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
Miki Bratt, AICP, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMFNT AND DEVELOPMI=NT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
NO. 95-01 - NORTHTOVVN HOUSING DFVFI OPMFNT CORPORATION - A request
to change the land use category from Industrial Park (Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low
Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38 acres of land at 9775 Main
Street (south side of Main Street east of Archibald Avenue). The City will also
consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and "M" (Medium
Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-062-01.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMFNT AND INDUSTRIAl ARFA SPFCIFIC PI AN
AMFNDMF:NT NO. 95-01 NORTHTOVVN HOUSING DI=VFLOPMFNT
CORPORATION - A request to change the land use category from Industrial Park
(Subarea 17) to "LM" (Low Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 1.38
acres of land at 9775 Main Street (south side of Main Street east of Archibald
Avenue). The City will also consider "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre)
and "M" (Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 209-062-01.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached ordinances consistent with City Council approval of
Resolutions 95-100 and 95-101 on June 21, 1995.
DISCUSSION: On June 21, 1995, the City Council held an advertised public hearing on the subject
items and voted approval of related resolutions 95-100 and 95-101. However, the approval of
Development Distdct Amendments and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendments must be by
ordinance. Accordingly, the appropriate ordinances are attached.
ACTION: Approval and first reading of the attached ordinances.
submi~
Dan Coleman
Principal Planner
BB:MB:sp
Attachments:
Ordinance of Approval for Development Distdct Amendment 95-01
Ordinance of Approval for Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 95-01
ORDINANCE NO. ~/"'//
A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT NO. 95-01, CHANGING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR
1.38 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN
STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-062-01.
A. Recitals.
1. The Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for
Development Distdct Amendment No. 95-01 as described in the title of this Ordinance and Exhibit
"1" attached to this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development Distdct
Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On May 24, 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public headng. On June 21, 1995, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 24, 1995, and to this Coundl dudng the above-referenced
public hearing on June 21, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 1.38 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located on the south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald
Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as
Industrial Park; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is
developed in-part with single family residences and in-part vacant and undeveloped. The property
to the west is designated Industrial Park and is developed. The property to the east is designated
Low Residential and is developed. The property to the south is designated General Industrial and
is in-part railroad right-of-way, in-part vacant and undeveloped, and in-part developed with single
family residences.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO,
DDA 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP.
July 5, 1995
Page 2
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and
properties
properties.
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration based
upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the City Coundl; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered
the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That, based on the environmental assessment, no significant adverse
environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the City Coundl finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial
Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will
have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff
reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Courtall during the public headng, the
City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d)
of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council approves Development District Amendment No. 95-01 changing the Development
CiTY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DDA 95-01 - NORTHTOVVN HOUSING DEV. CORP.
July 5, 1995
Page 3
Districts Map from Industrial Park to Low Medium Residential for 1.38 acres of land located on the
south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald Avenue (Exhibit 1 ).
6. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or
word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of
competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions,
sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
7. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be
published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a
newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontado, California, and circulated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. ~ qC~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 95-01 REMOVING FROM THE INDUSTRIAL
AREA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP 1.38 ACRES DESIGNATED
INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 17) LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
MAIN STREET APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD
AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
APN: 209-062-01.
A. Recitals.
1. The Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for Industrial
Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 95-01 as described in the title of this Ordinance and in Exhibit
"1" attached to this Ordinance. Hereinaffer in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific
Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On May 24, 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing, and on June 21, 1995, the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 24, 1995, and to this Council during the above-referenced
public hearing on June 21. 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 1.38 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration. located on the south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald
Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as
Industrial Park (Subarea 17); and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is
developed in-part with single family residences and in-part vacant and undeveloped. The property
to the west is designated Industrial Park and is developed. The property to the east is designated
Low Residential and is developed. The property to the south is designated General Industrial and
is in-part railroad right-of-way, in-part vacant and undeveloped, and in-part developed with single
family residences.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
ISPA NO. 95-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP.
July 5, 1995
Page 2
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration based
upon the findings as follows:
a, That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Coundl has reviewed and considered
the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That, based on the environmental assessment, no signfficant adverse
environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code
of Regulations, the City Coundl finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial
Study and Negative Dedaretion for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will
have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff
reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council dudng the public headng, the
City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d)
of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
ISPA NO. 95-01 - NORTHTOVVN HOUSING DEV. CORP.
July 5, 1995
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 95-01 removing from the
Industrial Area Specific Plan Land Use Map 1.38 acres designated Industrial Park (Subarea 17)
located on the south side of Main Street approximately 288 feet east of Archibald Avenue (Exhibit
1).
6. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or
word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of
competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions,
sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
7. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be
published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a
newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontado, California, and circulated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager '~,, LL'cLb~
· ',.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ~
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 540
Due to unforseen problems with the publishing of the Ordinance in the newspaper, it is necessary
to repeat the second reading at tonight's meeting. The information in the Ordinance has not
changed - this is only a technical requirement before the Ordinance can be published in the
newspaper.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
/dja
Attachment
-j
ORDNANCE NO. 540
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION
10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE
REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN
CITY STREETS
A. Recitals
(i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that this City Council may,
by ordinance, set pfima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway.
(ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of
certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Pan B of this
Ordinance.
(iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Pan B,
below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above.
B. Ordinance
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1
Section 10.20.020 hereby is mended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read,
in words and figures, as follows:
10.90.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council
resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by
state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets,
and it is declared the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or
pans of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof:
Ordinance No. 540
Page 2
Name of Street or Portion Affected
1. Archibald Avenue. - Banyan Street to north end
2. Archibald Avenue - 4th Street to Banyan Street
3. Arrow Route. - Baker Avenue to Haven Avenue
4. Baker Avenue - 8th Street to Foothill Blvd
5. Banyan Street from Beryl Street to London Avenue
6. Banyan Street - Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue
7. Banyan Street from west City Limits to Beryl Street
8. Base Line Road. - west City limits to Camelian Street
9. Base Line Road. - Carnelian Street to Hermosa Avenue
10. Base Line Road. - Hermosa Avenue to Spruce Avenue
11. Beryl Street - Banyan Street to end
12. Beryl Street - 800' N/o Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street
13. Canistel Avenue - Wilson Avenue to Antietam Drive
14. Carnelian Street - Vineyard Avenue to end
15. Center Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Church Street
16. Church Street - Pepper Street to Archibald Avenue
17. Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue
18. Church Street - Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue
19. East Avenue - Base Line Road. to Highland Avenue
20. 8th Street - Grove Avenue to Haven Avenue
21. Etiwanda Avenue - Foothill Blvd.. to 241h Street
22. Fairmont Drive - Highland Avenue to Milliken Avenue
23. Fairmont Drive - Milliken Avenue to Victoria Park Lane
24. Fredricksburg Avenue - Banyan Street to Seven Pines Drive
25. Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Foothill Blvd.
26. Haven Avenue - 4th Street to Hillside Road.
27. Hellman Avenue - Foothill Blvd.. to Alta Loma Drive
28. Hellman Avenue - 500' N/o Manzanita Drive to Valley View
29. Hellman Avenue - 6th Street to Foothill Blvd.
Declared Prima Facie
Speed Limit (MPH)
50
45
45
35
35
45
40
45
40
45
45
40
35
45
40
35
40
45
45
45
45
35
35
35
40
45
35
40
45
7/
Ordinance No. 540
Page 3
Name of
Hermosa
Hermosa
Hermosa
Highland
Highland
Street or Portion Affected
Avenue - Base Line Road. to Wilson Avenue
Avenue o Wilson Avenue to Sun Valley Drive
Avenue - 8th Street to Base Line Road.
Avenue - Sapphire Street to Carnelian Street
Avenue - Amethyst Street to Hermosa Avenue
Declared Prima Fa¢ie
Speed Limit (MPH)
30. 45
31. 40
32. 45
33. 40
34. 35
35. Highland Avenue - Hermosa Avenue to 800' W/o Haven Avenue 45
36. Hillside Road. - Ranch Gate to Amethyst Street 35
37. Hillside Road. - Amethyst Street to Haven Avenue 40
38. Hillside Road. - Haven Avenue to Canistel Avenue 35
39. Hillview Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30
40. Kenyon Way - Milliken Avenue to Victoria Park Lane 35
41. Lark Drive - Kenyon Way to Rochester Avenue 35
42. Lemon Avenue - Jasper Street to Beryl Street 35
43. Lemon Avenue - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue 40
44. Lemon Avenue o Haven Avenue to Highland Avenue 40
45. Manzanita Drive - Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue 35
46. Morning Place/Vintage Drive - Banyan Street to Milliken Avenue 35
47. Mountain View Drive - Spruce Avenue to Milliken Avenue 40
48. Netherlands View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive. 30
49. 9th Street - Baker Avenue to Archibald Avenue 40
50. Red Hill Country Club Drive - Foothill Blvd. to Alta Cuesta 35
51. Rochester Avenue o Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Road 40
52. San Beruardino Road. - Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue 35
53. Sapphire Street - Banyan Street to end 45
54. Sapphire Street - 19th Street to Lemon Avenue 40
55. 7th Street - Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue 45
56. Sierra Crest View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30
57. Spruce Avenue - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Road. 40
58. Summit Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue 45
Ordinance No. 540
Page 4
Declared Prima Facie
Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH)
59. Terrace View Loop - Vintage Drive to Vintage Drive 30
60. Terra Vista Parkway - Church Street to Milliken Avenue 40
61. Victoria Street - Archibald Avenue to Ramona Avenue 35
62. Victoria Street - Etiwanda Avenue to Route. 15 40
63. Victoria Street o Haven Avenue to Mendocino PI. 40
64. Victoria Park Lane - Fairmont Way to Base Line Road. 35
65. Victoria Windrows Loop (north &south) 35
66. Vineyard Avenue o Church Street to Base Line Road. 40
67. Vineyard Avenue - 8th Street to Carnelian Avenue 45
68. Vintage Drive - Milliken Avenue to east end 35
69. Whittram Avenue o Etiwanda Avenue to east City limits 40
70. Wilson Avenue - Amethyst Avenue to Haven Avenue 45
71. Wilson Avenue - Haven Avenue to 200' east of Canistel Avenue 40
(Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124
(i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which
are more than are reasonable or safe; and
(ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to
facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said
streets or portions thereof; and
(iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said
streets; and
(iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon
said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein.
SECTION 2
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be
published as required by law.
Ordinance No. 540
Page 5
SECTION 3
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published
within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
DATE: July 5, 1995
-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
TO:.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager
BY:
Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE
OF A NOTE IN A PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $25 MILLION TO
PROVIDE FOR THE FINANCING OF CERTAIN MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECTS
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached Resolution approving the issuance of the notes, and authorize
the Mayor to execute the necessary documents.
BACKGROUND
In September, 1994, the Agency approved a Loan and Pledge Agreement with
Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SCHDC) for the
acquisition of existing apartment complexes in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In
May, 1995, the City approved Inducement Resolutions to provide for the tax exempt
financing of the acquisition of three apartment complexes, Mountainside
Apartments, Sycamore Springs Apartments, and Monterey Village Apartments.
SCHDC acquired Sycamore Springs Apartments in March, 1995.
This item was continued from the June 27, 1995 City Council meeting.
ANAI.YSI~
SCHDC has arranged for a short-term, tax-exempt loan from Sanwa Bank to acquire
Mountainside Apartments and Monterey Village Apartments. Under federal
guidelines, such a loan qualifies technically as an issuance of tax-exempt bonds, and
therefore requires the City to follow the procedures as if such bonds were being sold.
TEFRA requires that prior to the issuance of any such tax-exempt debt, the
appropriate legislative body must hold a public hearing on the proposed issue. The
City held the TEFRA hearing on June 27, 1995.
The loan is intended only as interim finandng for the timely acquisition of these
apartment complexes prior to the expiration of the Agency's authority to acquire
existing housing units. This will allow these existing units to be counted towards
July 5, 1995
Staff Report - SCHDC Financing
Page 2
the Agency's State-mandated housing obligations. Permanent financing will be
developed for the entire pool of units following their acquisition.
The loan is intended only as interim financing for the timely acquisition of these
apartment complexes prior to the expiration of the Agency's authority to acquire
existing housing units. This will allow these existing units to be counted towards
the Agency's State-mandated housing obligations. Permanent financing will be
developed for the entire pool of units following their acquisition.
The proposed financing is similar in structure to a traditional multi-family housing
bond. The notes will be issued by the City, with SCHDC the borrower. The loan to
SCHDC will be secured by the pledge of Redevelopment Agency housing funds and
deeds of trust on the financed properties. The City will have no obligation to pay;
no City funds will be at risk.
Regulatory Agreements will be recorded against each property, providing for the
restriction of 40% of the units as affordable to the income groups targeted by the
Agency. These restrictions will be maintained for a minimum of 30 years.
This transaction is consistent with the original Loan and Pledge Agreement between
the Redevelopment Agency and SCHDC.
Respectfully submitted,
niel'~s' ~
Redevelopment Manager
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A NOTE IN A
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $25,000,000 TO PROVIDE
FINANCING FOR CERTAIN MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS,
APPROVING A FORM OF LOAN AGREEMENTAND THE PLEDGE BY THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CERTAIN TAX
INCREMENT MONEYS AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") is
authorized pursuant to the provisions of Section 52101 and
following of the California Health and Safety Code (the "Law") to
issue bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness for the
purpose of making loans to certain nonprofit corporations which
assist in providing low and moderate income housing for citizens of
the City; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a loan
arrangement (the "Term Loan") and to issue a note or notes in a
principal amount not to exceed $25,000,000 (the "Note") pursuant to
one or more Term LoanAgreements (the "Term LoanAgreement") by and
between the City and SANWA Bank (the "Bank") for the purpose of
providing funds which will be loaned (the "Developer Loans") to the
Southern California Housing Development Corporation, a California
nonprofit corporation (the "Developer"), under one or more
Developer Loan Agreements among the City, the Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") and the Developer (the
"Developer Loan Agreements") to finance the acquisition and
rehabilitation of three multifamily housing projects located in the
City known as the Mountainside Apartments and the Monterey Village
Apartments (together, the "Projects"); and
WHEREAS, the Note will be secured by an assignment by the
City to the Bank of the revenues pledged by the Developer to the
City under the Developer Loan Agreements and will further be
secured by a Deed of Trust relating to the MountainsideApartments
from the Developer to the City (the "Deed of Trust"), a Second Deed
of Trust relating to the Monterey Village Apartments from the
Developer to the City (the "Second Deed of Trust") and by a pledge
by the Agency of a portion of the tax increment (the "Tax
Increment") moneys it is required to set aside pursuant to Section
33334.3 of the COLt~LUnity RedevelopmeLt Law being Part 1 of Division
24 of the California Health and Safety Code (the "Redevelopment
Law") in the Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for
purposes of increasing, improving and preserving the supply of low
and moderate housing in and around the Rancho Redevelopment Project
(the "Redevelopment Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that the Projects and
the pledge of the Tax Increment as contemplated by the Developer
Loan Agreements are of benefit to the Redevelopment Project; and
KAS271205
~A$271205
WHEREAS, to ensure that the Projects will be operated in
a manner which will make low and moderate income housing available
to the residents of the City and to ensure that interest on the
Note will remain tax-exempt for federal income tax purposes and
that certain requirements of State law will be complied with, the
City, the Agency and the Developer will enter into one or more
regulatory agreements (the "Regulatory Agreements") which will
place certain rental restrictions on the Projects; and
WHEREAS, there has been presented at this meeting a form
of the Term LoanAgreement, the Developer LoanAgreements, the Deed
of Trust, the Second Deed of Trust and Regulatory Agreements; and
WHEREAS, as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code") this City Council
has heretofore conducted a duly noticed public hearing on June 27,
1995, with respect to the proposed issuance of the Note and the
financing of the Projects, such notice being duly published in the
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINEDAN D ORDERED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, as follows:
Section 1. Approval of Issuance of Note and Making of
Loan. The issuance of the Note in an aggregate principal amount
not to exceed $25,000,000 by the Agency pursuant to the Law, the
making of the Developer Loans with the proceeds of the Note by the
City to the Developer and the financing of the Projects are hereby
approved. This approval is made in order to meet the public
approval requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code.
Section 2. Term Loan Agreement. The form of Term Loan
Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") by and between the City and the
Bank which establishes the terms and conditions of the Note and the
Term Loan from the Bank to the City presented at this meeting is
hereby approved and the Mayor or the City Manager and the City
Clerk are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and
on behalf of the City, to execute, acknowledge and deliver one or
more Term Loan Agreements in substantially the form presented at
this meeting with such changes therein as the officers executing
the same may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by
the execution and delivery thereof.
Section 3. Form of Note. The form of the Note as set
forth in the Term Loan Agreement is hereby approved and the Mayor
or the City Manager and the City Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to execute by manual or facsimile signature, in the name
and on behalf of the City and under its seal, such Note in the
aggregate principal amount set forth in the Term LoanAgreement and
all in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Term Loan
Agreement.
Section 4. City Manager Authorized to Establish Final
Terms of Note. The CityManager, based on such advice of Staff and
-2-
KAS271205
consultant's to the City as he may deem necessary, is hereby
authorized and directed to act on behalf of the City to establish
and determine (i) the final principal amount of the Note, which
amount shall not exceed $25,000000, and (ii) the interest rate on
the Note.
Section 5. Developer Loan Agreements. The form of
Developer Loan Agreement under which the City will loan to the
Developer the proceeds of the Note and under which the Agency will
pledge the Tax Increment to the repayment of the Developer Loans
presented at this meeting is hereby approved and the Mayor, or the
City Manager and the City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed,
for and in the name of and on behalf of the City, to execute,
acknowledge and deliver one or more Developer Loan Agreements in
substantially the form presented at this meeting with such changes
therein as the officers executing the same may approve, such
approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and deliver
thereof.
Section 6. Regulatory Agreements. The form or
Regulatory Agreement under which each of the Projects will become
subject to certain rental restrictions for the purpose of complying
with the Law and Federal tax law as it relates to the use of tax-
exempt bond proceeds presented at this meeting is hereby approved
and the Mayor, or the City Manager and the City Clerk are hereby
authorized and directed, for and in the name of and on behalf of
the City, to execute, acknowledge and deliver one or more
Regulatory Agreements in substantially the form presented at this
meeting with such changes therein as the officers executing the
same may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the
execution and deliver thereof.
Section 7. Redevelopment Law RegulatoryAgreements. The
form or RegulatoryAgreement under which each of the Projects will
become subject to certain rental restrictions for the purpose of
complying with requirements of the Redevelopment Law as they relate
to low and moderate income housing restrictions presented at this
meeting is hereby approved and the Mayor, or the City Manager and
the City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the
name of and on behalf of the City, to execute, acknowledge and
deliver one or more RegulatoryAgreements in substantially the form
presented at this meeting with such changes therein as the officers
executing the same may approve, such approval to be conclusively
evidenced by the execution and deliver thereof.
Section 8. Deed of Trust. Second Deed of Trust and
Assignment of Rights. The Deed of Trust relating to the
Mountainside Apartments from the Developer to the City and the
Second Deed of Trust relating to the Monterey Village Apartments
from the Developer to the City each as presented at this meeting
are hereby approved and the Mayor, or the CityManager and the City
Clerk are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of
and on behalf of the City, to execute, acknowledge and deliver said
Deed of Trust and said Second Deed of Trust, in substantially the
-3-
forms presented at this meeting with such changes therein as the
officers executing the same may approve, such approval to be
.conclusively evidenced by the execution and deliver thereof. The
City Council also hereby approves the assignment of the Deed of
Trust and the Second Deed of Trust and of all revenues it will be
entitled to recover under the Developer LoanAgreements to the Bank
and the Mayor or the CityManager is authorized to sign any and all
documents to effectuate such assignment.
Section 9. Approval of Agency Pledge. The City Council
hereby approves the pledge of the Tax Increment by the Agency to
the repayment of the Developer Loan all as set forth in the
Developer Loan Agreements.
Section 10. Requisitions. The City Manager, or his
designee, is hereby authorized and directed to pay the costs of
issuing the Note from the proceeds of the Note and other moneys of
the City available therefor.
Section 11. Retaining of Bond Counsel. The law firm of
Best, Best & Krieger is hereby retained by the City to act as Bond
Counsel to the City on terms as shall be agreed upon between said
firm and the City Manager.
Section 12. Other Acts. The officers and staff of the
City are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to
do any and all things, to execute and deliver any and all
documents, which in consultation with Staff and Note Counsel, they
may deem necessary or advisable in order to cons~tete the
issuance, sale and delivery of the Note, or otherwise effectuate
the purposes of this Resolution, and any and all such actions
previously taken by such officers or staff members are hereby
ratified and confirmed.
KAS271205
-4-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:.
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 8.30 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REI ,ATING TO TAXICABS
When the Taxicab Ordinance was first adopted in 1992, the City Council made a
commitment to review the ordinance after it had been in place for a while. Earlier
this year, the City Council took testimony on this issue and formed an ad hoc
committee to look at possible changes to the ordinance. The ad hoc committee, Mayor
Pro Tern Gutierrez and Councilmember Curatalo, have met and discussed the matter
and these amendments are the result of those discussions.
The pr9posed amendments make six primary changes to the existing ordinance.
These changes are listed below.
The amendments require that all drivers be covered by worker's compensation
insurance as required by state law.
The amendments add a "Convenience and Necessity" clause to the ordinance.
This section would require that a taxicab company prove to the City Council
that there is a public need for their taxicabs and that current levels of service
are not adequate. In the past, this item has been discussed in terms of
providing a company a monopoly. However, the City Council is the one that
makes the decision of convenience and necessity and can allow for more than
one company. This clause gives the City Council more control over who is
providing service to our residents. The current ordinance allows for anyone
with no criminal history and the proper insurance to start a taxicab service in
the City. This section allows the City Council more discretion in approving
applications for providing taxicab service.
,
The amendments require that all taxicabs have taximeters that have been
certified by the County Division of Weights and Measures.
The amendments allow the City to accept taxicab drivers permits from other
jurisdictions if those permits meet our minimum standards. This would be
implemented by having the Chief of Police review each applicant's permit and
cross checking it with the issuing agency. If the Chief of Police is satisfied, he
will inform the City to allow the driver to operate. If the Chief of Police is not
satisfied with the permit and information supplied by the applicant, he will
recommend that the applicant go through the City's permit process. This
process is the same as the current process and involves fingerprinting and a
background check by our Police Department.
5. The amendments expand the grounds for denying or revoking a taxicab
AMENDMENTS TO TAXICAB ORDINANCE
July 5, 1995
Page 2
driver's permit to include the sale of illegal drugs; assault or battery or other
violent behavior against a person; any conviction of a violent felony, no
matter how long ago it occurred, if the City has reasonable cause to believe the
person could pose a threat.
The amendments include a section of requirements for taxicab drivers to
follow. These requirements include such things as keeping a log of
passengers and pick-up/drop-off points; wearing a uniform such as a hat or
vest with identifying insignia; and keeping the cab clean.
The ad hoc committee felt that these changes would increase the number of taxicab
drivers coming in to get their permits and would give the City more control over the
taxicab companies operating on our streets. Making it easier for drivers to come in
and get permits from the City and requiring taxicab companies to prove their
necessity to the City Council will help enhance public safety. The intention of the
proposed changes is to not create a monopoly but to provide for greater public safety.
The amendments presented to the City Council are for discussion. If the City Council
wants tb proceed with these changes, staff will schedule the public hearing for an
upcoming City Council meeting.
~ A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
/dab
DRAFT
FOR REVIEW pURPOSES ONLY
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
Pj~NCHO CUCAMONGAAMENDING CHAPTER 8.30 OF THE
KANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
TAXICAB SERVICE AND DRIVER QUALIFICATIONS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
ordains as follows:
Section
Section 8.30.010 of Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is amended by the addition of a
new subsection "A" to read, in words and figures, as follows:
"A. 'Certificate' means a public convenience and
necessity permit as defined in this Chapter."
Existing subsections "A" through "E" hereby are
re-lettered "B" through "F."
Section
Section 8.30,030 of Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is amended by the addition of a
new subsection "K" to read, in words and figures, as follows:
"K. Evidence that the applicant has procured workers
compensation insurance covering any and all drivers to
be utilized by the applicant should a taxicab service
permit be issued."
Section
Section 8.30,040 of Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is amended to read, in words and
figures, as follows:
"8.30,040 Issuance of a taxicab service permit.
"Upon the furnishing of all the information
required by Section 8.30.030 and payment of the required
fee under this Chapter, the Administrative Services
Director shall set a date and time of not less than ten
(10) nor more than forty-five (45) days thereafter for a
public hearing concerning the application to be
conducted before the City Council, and shall give notice
of the time so set, at least five (5) business days
before the date of said hearing, to the applicant, by
first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid, at the address
set out in the application, and by publication of the
DRAFT
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
application in a daily newspaper of general circulation
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga on two different days.
"At the time set for the hearing of the
application, the Council may examine the applicant and
all persons interested in the matter set forth in said
application, and shall determine whether or not the
public interest, convenience and necessity require the
issuance of the permit applied for, and if it be found
by the Council that the public interest and convenience
and necessity require the issuance of the permit applied
for, it shall, by motion or resolution, order the
Administrative Services Director to issue a taxicab
service permit.
"The following factors shall be weighed with
the burden upon the applicant to show public need and
necessity:
"A. The inadequacy of existing taxi services.
"B. The population density and socio-economic
characteristics in the proposed area of operation.
"C. Type and frequency of transportation
service needed in the proposed area of operation.
"D. Existing public transportation patterns,
schedules and service levels and the impact of the
application upon such service.
"E. Traffic and parking conditions.
"F. The probable permanence and quality of
the services offered by the applicant.
"G. The character of taxi service proposed by
the applicant as demonstrated by: the proposed use, if
any, of a radio communications system, the proposed use
of terminals and private and public taxi stands, the
time of day and night when service is to be offered, and
the proposed number and character of vehicles.
"H. The financial status, character, and
responsibility of the applicant as demonstrated by: the
applicant's ability to provide, maintain and operate the
number of vehicles proposed to be operated in accordance
with the character of service proposed in the
application, the applicant's criminal and driving
record, if any, as well as credit record and evidence of
liability and worker's compensation insurance.
DRAFT
FOR REVIEW pURPOSES ONLY
"I. The experience of the applicant in
taxicab service operations as an owner, manager, or taxi
driver.
"Upon receipt of an application and prior to
making a determination of public convenience and
necessity, the City Council shall notify each holder of
an existing certificate that an application has been
filed and of the date and time of the public hearing to
consider said application."
Section
Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
hereby is amended by the addition of a new Section 8.30.065 to
read, in words and figures, as follows:
"8.30.065 Taximeters - Required.
"A. All taxicabs shall be equipped with
taximeters that have been inspected and certified by the
County Division of Weights and Measures. Each taximeter
shall have affixed to it written or other evidence that
such taximeter has been so inspected and is currently
certified.
"B. It is unlawful for any person operating a
taxicab to operate such vehicle unless it has approved
rates conspicuously posted for passenger observation,
and unless it is equipped with a taximeter of such type
and design as approved by a County Division of Weights
and Measures. It shall be the duty of every permittee
hereunder using any taximeter to, at all times, keep
such meter accurate. Such meters shall be subject to
inspection from time to time by any police officer of
the City or any authorized inspector delegated to this
purpose. Upon the discovery of any inaccuracy of a
taximeter, the permittee shall remove or cause to be
removed any vehicle equipped with such taximeter from
the streets of the City until such taximeter has been
correctly adjusted and certified by the County Division
of Weights and Measures."
Section
Section 8.30,070 of Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is amended to read, in words and
figures, as follows:
DRAFT
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
"8.30.070 Taxicab driver's permit required.
"A. It is unlawful for any person to accept
any passenger in a taxi within the City, or otherwise
provide transportation services by taxi beginning in the
City, without having a current taxicab driver's permit
issued pursuant to this Chapter.
"B. The Administrative Services Director may
accept current taxicab driver permits issued by another
city or county where such city's or county's permitting
requirements meet the minimum standards of this Chapter
and, in the Director's discretion, provide for the
safety of the residents of the City. In such case, a
taxicab driver may operate with that permit in lieu of a
permit issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga."
Section
Section 8.30,090 of Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is amended to read, in words and
figures, as follows:
"8.30.090 Grounds for denial or revocation of a
taxicab driver's permit. A taxicab driver's permit may
be denied or revoked on the following grounds:
"A. The driver does not possess a valid Class
3 driver's license issued by the State of California;
"B. The driver has been convicted of a crime
within the last five (5) years which involved:
"1. Fraud or dishonesty with respect to
any member of the public;
II2 ·
alcohol or drugs;
Driving while under the influence of
"3. Injuries to any member of the public
as a result of such driver's operation of a taxi;
"4. Any assault or battery, or other
violent behavior against any person;
"5. The sale of illegal drugs.
"C. The driver has been convicted of driving
a taxicab recklessly within the preceding two years;
DRAFT
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
"D. The driver has repeatedly and
persistently violated the traffic law of the city,
county or state;
"E. Within the last five (5) years:
"1. The driver has driven a taxicab the
driver knew or should have known was not in good order
and repair;
"2. The driver has violated any of the
provisions of this Chapter;
"3. The driver has charged any person
more than the established rate for taxicab service;
"F. The driver has made false statements on
an application submitted under this Chapter;
"G. The driver is required to register under
Section 290 of the Penal Code of the State of
California;
"H. The driver has been convicted of a
violent felony at any time and the Director has
reasonable cause to believe that such driver continues
to constitute a threat to the public health, safety or
welfare;
"I. The driver is not at least eighteen (18)
years of age."
Section
Chapter 8.30 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
hereby is amended by the addition of a new Section 8.30,105 to
read, in words and figures, as follows:
"8.30.105 Requirements for taxicab drivers.
"Each taxicab driver:
"A. shall keep an accurate, legible record of
all passengers carried, the pick up and drop off points,
and the date and time carried. This record shall be
available for up to one year for review by the Director
or designee thereof.
"B. shall not refuse to transport anyone
requesting a ride except when the safety of the driver
or passenger may be jeopardized by such transportation.
5
DRAFT
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
"C. shall wear a distinctive'uniform with an
emblem, badge or insignia, and similar color scheme
identifying the driver's association with an operating
company.
teD .
condition.
shall keep the taxicab in good mechanical
"E. shall charge only those rates as
submitted on the application.
"F. shall keep the taxicab in a clean and
sanitary condition."
Section
permittees.
Application of Ordinance to existing
Each taxicab service and taxicab driver holding a
current taxicab service or driver permit, issued by the City, as
of the effective date of this Ordinance, may continue operating
pursuant to such permits until the expiration thereof, whereupon
compliance with the additional conditions and restrictions
imposed by this Ordinance shall be required. Further, nothing
herein shall excuse any violations of Chapter 8.30, nor affect
any prosecution thereunder, occurring prior to this Ordinance
becoming effective.
Section !. Penalty for Violation.
:It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership,
or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with
any of the requirements of this Ordinance. Any person, firm,
partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this
Ordinance or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall
be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof
shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars or
by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine
and imprisonment. Each such person, firm, partnership, or
corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each
and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation
of any of the provisions of this Ordinance is committed,
continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or
corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefore as provided
in this Ordinance.
Section 10- Civil Remedies Available.
A violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance
shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through
civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or
permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for
the abatement of such nuisance.
DRAFT
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
Section 11. Severability.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrased,
or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason deemed or held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance. The City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it
would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection,
sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences,
clauses, phrases, or other portions might subsequently be
declared invalid of unconstitutional.
Section 1.._g2.
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper
of.general circulation published in the City of Ontario,
California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
PAS8ED this day of , 1995.
Mayor
I, DEBBIE ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of
, 1995, and was finally passed at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held
on the day of , 1995, by the following
vote.
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga
L\133\OROTAXI\RC 1.3.18
Rancho Cucamonga City Council
City Hall
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
July 5, 1995
Thank you for taking my questions.
Today's Daily Bulletin contained an article stating that the City Council expects to
co-sign loan papers tonight with Southern CA Housing Development Corp. (HDC)
for $25M with Sanwa Bank.
o HDC will buy 1000 apartments and 40% will be rented to low/very-low income
households.
o The City will commit $2.7M/yr (x30 yrs = $80.1M) to guarantee the loan
HDC will pay the remaining debt from lease income (if any). No committed
funding amounts from HDC.
o My personal experience as a former owner of a 4-plex apartment in San
Bernardino confirms that these low income households are poor risks for paying
rent and maintaining the property value. I also encountered theft, guns, and drug
problems with my tenants.
Have you asked the Police Dept. for theix recommendations and insights?
o I see unfavorable impacts to RC from importing low income households as
follows:
Increased potential for crime and gangs
-- More victims, property damage, vandalism, injury and death
-- Increased cost of Police operations
-- Increased risk of injury and death to Police officers
Impacts to Jr. and High schools in area - Alta Loma and RC High.
-- Crime in schools
-- Interference with education process from unruly students
Reduced attractiveness of RC 'to business due to increased crime
$80M over the next 30 years to acquire property of declining value
Why take this Poison Pill, and pay to do it??
The Bulletin article implies that this is the result of a set~ement with the Western
Center on Law and Poverty. What is the penalty for non-compliance. Maybe no
teeth in the law. Maybe pay a nominal fine and be done with it.
What about a Proposition on the next ballet asking whether the RC community
wants to buy 2,375 low-income housing units by the year 2000. Property owners
might be willing to pay an extra assessment each year NOT to have low-income
housing in RC.
I recommend to the Council that we decide not to provide low-income housing in RC
beyond what we currently have, and actively find alternatives which allow us to
avoid this undesirable action.
Thank you for your time.
JOHN R. TREICHLER
10138 Stratton Ct.
Alta Loma, CA 91737
AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO PRODUCTION OF CONCERTS
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the
latest date appearing opposite the respective parties' signatures
below, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal
corporation (herein referred to as "City"), and ACTS MULTIMEDIA
PRODUCTIONS, a California Limited Partnership (hereinafter
referred to as "Acts") concerning the production and presentation
of certain concerts.
A. Recitals.
(i) Acts is a professional production company
established for the purposes of producing, presenting and making
available to the public musical concerts.
(ii) City desires to participate in the production of
certain of Acts' productions during the time period specified
herein.
(iii) City and Acts desire to make available to the
public certain musical concerts to be produced at City's stadium
commonly referred to as the Epicenter (hereinafter referred to as
"Stadium") on the terms and conditions set forth herein.
B. Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between City and
Acts as follows:
1. In accordance with the provisions hereof, City and
Acts shall produce a musical concert at the Stadium on September
21, 1995 with the featured performance provided by the group
Chicago on the terms specified in that letter addressed to Mr.
Steve Smith dated April 17, 1995 executed on behalf of Acts by
Jimmy Page. A true and correct copy of that letter is attached
hereto and marked Exhibit "A". Hereinafter the above-referenced
musical concert is referred to as "the Chicago Concert."
2. Acts shall provide all of the following services
in connection with the Chicago Concert and shall employ its best
professional efforts in doing so:
a. The creation, in consultation with City, of
all publicity and advertising copy, brochures, programs and press
releases including, but not limited to, generating corporate
sponsors such as beverage, footwear, fast food and car companies,
and providing for a printed program for the concert with
band/artists biographies, tear-out coupons and special drawings
for audience participation;
b. The hiring and training of all event staff
including ushers, ticket takers, security and parking lot
c. The coordination of all merchandise sales;
d. The provision and coordination of paramedics
and other emergency care providers;
e. The obtaining of liability and property
damage insurance reasonably satisfactory to City's City Manager
(or his designee) and City's City Attorney which names City and
its elected officials, officers, employees and consultants as
additional insureds;
personnel;
f. The administration of the performers'
contract or contracts;
g. The ordering and coordination of sound stage
lights, field seating requirements and concession and restroom
set ups;
h.
room activities;
i. Negotiations with a ticketing agency for the
printing, provision and distribution of tickets for the concert,
provided that the agreement for such services shall be directly.
by and between City and the ticketing agency so that City
receives the funds collected by the ticketing agency in selling
concert tickets; and
j. Supervision of the concert production,
including day before and day of show activities.
3. City shall timely pay all reasonable expenses
related to the production of the Chicago Concert, which expenses
generally are listed on Exhibit "B" hereto, which the parties
estimate will approximate One Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars
($120,000.00) (not including payments to Acts or rent which is
not being charged by City).
4. Other than as stated in paragraph 5 below, all
revenues received by City from the Chicago Concert shall be
applied in the following priority order:
The supervision of all backstage and dressing
3
a. As a first priority, Acts and City each shall
receive One Dollar ($1.00) for each ticket sold for the Chicago
Concert;
b. As a second priority, City shall retain an
amount equal to the total of costs paid by City pursuant to
paragraph 3 hereof and City's direct personnel costs incurred in
providing the Stadium and the maintenance thereof for the Chicago
Concert;
c. As a third priority, Acts shall receive the
sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) if the total tickets
sold for the Chicago Concert are 8,499 or less or the sum of
Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) if the total tickets
sold are 8,500 or more; and
d. As a fourth priority, City shall retain all
remaining revenues received.
5. In the event that Chicago Concert revenues are
received from advertising exceeding payments made by City as and
for all advertising, sixty percent (60%) of those net revenues
shall be distributed to Acts and forty percent (40%) thereof
shall be retained by City. In that regard, all contracts for
advertising which generate revenues shall be directly between the
advertiser and City.
6. City's duties and responsibilities hereunder shall
be coordinated by City's Deputy City Manager or his designated
representative. Acts' duties and responsibilities hereunder
shall be coordinated by Mr. Ron Burke.
4
7. Acts agrees that it will indemnify, defend and
hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents and
employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons
or property by reason of Acts' performance of its obligations
hereunder to the maximum extent allowed by law.
8. Acts shall not broadcast or permit or allow any
broadcast over radio, TV, or other broadcasting mechanism of any
portion or portions of the Chicago Concert without the express
written permission of City. Further, Acts shall not record or
permit or allow the recordation of any portion or portions of the
performance by taperecording, videotape, record or any other
means or methods without the express written permission of City.
Any such broadcasting or recording permission shall be the
subject of a separate agreement by and between Acts and City.
City will permit the news media access to the Stadium to tape
interviews or clips of the Chicago Concert performance.
9. This Agreement may not be assigned or transferred
without prior written consent of City.
10. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed
for all purposes under the laws of the State of California.
11. The parties hereto agree that they intend to
produce a second musical concert at the Stadium on the terms and
provisions provided herein prior to September 21, 1995. City's
City Manager may agree to and execute an addendum to this
5
Agreement providing for such a second concert on the terms and
provisions stated herein so long as the terms for payment to the
performer or performers for the second concert are satisfactory
to the City Manager.
WHEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby enter into this
Agreement.
Dated:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By:
William Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ACTS MULTIMEDIA PRODUCTIONS,
a California Limited Partnership
By:
Ron Burke, General Partner
N~132%CONAGR~E%RC 18.27 6
PRODUCTIONS
April 17, 1995
Mr. Steve Smith
Howard Rose Agency
Beverly Hills, CA.
Ref: Chicago
Dear Steve:
Below please find our flr~ offer for Chicago and production
(sound, lights and back line).
Date: September 12, 1995, 8100 PM
Venus: Rancho Cucamongo Epicenter
Capacity: 7500
Ticket Prices $22.00 average
Gross: $165,000.00
Offer: $55,000 guarantee plus 85% over $152,021.00
Attached please find estimated expense sheet.
The advertising for the above concert will be limited to the
inland valley newspapers (i~e-, The Daily Bulletin and The Sun];
radio will be KCAL and posters and flyers distributed in the inland
valley and mountain resorts.
If you have questions or need more information call me at 214
350-7696 x13.
Regards,
336. ~665
EXl~IBIT "A"
- 4
~ 39.~.d '~ t T'IOMON.A.S I~880~e Z £: T f cr-,~ f / ..' T ."f,m
.Staging
Power
Stageh~ncls
Loaders
El~ctnclins ....
pr~jucilon Mgr
~unner
Fork~
~amcade
-t /5'.,,4/,,.~,,p4,',,/'2'L~
/SZ~ O~Z &"~';,"/, /:::';',',~'~'