HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/04/16 - Agenda Packet~':N r _~~
~~ ~ _
10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801
City Office: (909) 477-2700
AGENDAS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETINGS
15~ and 3`d Wednesdays 4 7:00 P.M.
APRIL 16, 2008
MEMBERS
MAYOR
MAYOR PRO TEM
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Donald J. Kurth, M.D.
L. Dennis Michael
Rex Gutierrez
Sam Spagnolo
Diane Williams
CITY MANAGER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY CLERK
Jack Lam, AICP
James L. Markman
Debra J. Adams, CMC
ORDER OF BUSINESS
REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ........................ 7:00 P.M.
`~. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC -
i_.~,' RANCHO
~ CUCAMONGA
TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL
The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to
speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,
you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views
of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from
clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City
Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table
and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or
not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public
Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes
per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the
agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the
agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public
hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public
communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion
of the agenda has been completed.
Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution
AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS
Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library
and on the Citys website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table
during the Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST
Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access.
Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City
has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers.
The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho-
cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up)
Internet service.
The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at
7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board.
Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
® If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, Please
contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
APRIL 16, 2008
A. REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO
CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE
AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL.
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth
Mayor Pro Tem Michael
Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Announcement of PetSmart Spring National Adoption Weekend, May 2, 3 & 4, 2008.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency,
Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda.
State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not
previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive
testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by
the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All
communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council,
not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy
and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and
speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the
decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of
the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to
speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and
no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing
items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other
public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may
resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
APRII.16, 2008
2
D. AGENCY/FIRE BOARD/COUNCIL RESPONSES
TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council to respond to
comments made by the general public.
E. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be
removed by an Agencymember for discussion.
1. Approval of Check Register dated March 26 through April 8, 2008, for the total amount of ~
$448,884.41.
2. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 2008. 2
3. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with ASST Security to continue as a single ~ ~
source vendor for the repair, maintenance and upgrade of access control and related
security services in an amount not to exceed $140,000 annually, to be funded from various
City and Redevelopment Agency accounts.
4. Approval to accept quotes and authorize and execute contracts to G/M Business Interiors ~$
utilizing a San Bernardino County Contract in the amount of $73,414.04, plus a 10%
contingency in the amount of $7,341, and to Yamada Enterprises utilizing a CMAS Contract
in the amount of $194,259, plus a 10% contingency in the amount of $19,425, for furniture
and library book shelves for the Archibald Library Remodel Project, to be funded by an
appropriation from Fund 640 Fund Balance to Acct. No. 2640801-5606.
F. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be
removed by a Boardmember for discussion.
5. Approval of Check Register dated March 26 through April 8, 2008, for the total amount of 19
$189,814.22.
6. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 2008. 22
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
APRIL 16, 2008
svnwir_s
3
G. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be
removed by a Councilmember for discussion.
7. Approval of Check Register dated March 26 through April 8, 2008, and payroll ending April 27
8, 2008, for the total amount of $5,998,978.37.
8. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 2008. 64
9. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the 73
"Notice Inviting Bids' for the Southbound I-15 Onramo Widening at Base Line Road Proiect,
to be funded from Acct. No. 1124303565011511124-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-078 75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP
WIDENING AT BASE LINE ROAD PROJECT, IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
10. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the 8U
"Notice Inviting Bids" for the Southbound I-15 Onramo Widening at Foothill Boulevard
Proiect, to be funded from Acct. No. 1124303565011513124-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-079 82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP
WIDENING AT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PROJECT, IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
11. Approval of Community Services Update Report. 87
12. Approval to change the primary funding source for the construction of Garcia Park from Park 97
Development to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, and approval to appropriate
$1,100,000 into Acct. No. 11393035650/1313139-0 for the construction of Garcia Park.
13. Approval of reimbursement to the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) for g$
the City's share of the costs for constructing the Highland Avenue garden wall along the 210
Freeway, from east of Hermosa Avenue to Amethyst Avenue and from Hellman Avenue to
Beryl Avenue, per SANBAG Contract No. 04-052 and its Amendment No. 1, and to
appropriate $356,060 to Fund 120, Park Development (Acct. No. 11203055650/133512-0).
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4
APRIL 16, 2008
14. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with ASSI Security to continue as a single 100
source vendor for the repair, maintenance and upgrade of access control and related
security services in an amount not to exceed $140,000 annually, to be funded from various
City and Redevelopment Agency accounts.
15. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with RBF Consulting (CO 08-033), 101
not to exceed $185,830, for the preparation of an Initial StudylMitigated Negative Declaration
and/or Environmental Impact Report (DRC2008-00263) for the Biane Business Park Project,
within the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be funded from the developer deposit through
Account No. 10013145303.
16. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract 170
in the amount of $128,568.20 to the apparent low bidder, Mobassaly Engineering, Inc. (CO
08-042), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $12,856.82
for the Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Carnelian Street to Beryl Street, to be
funded from Measure "I" Funds, Acct. No. 1 1 76303 56 5011 62 71 76-0.
17. Approval of a contract amendment assigning Contract No. 92-011 from TruGreen Landcare 174
Tree Division to West Coast Arborists for city-wide tree maintenance services for the
balance of the 2007108 fiscal year, to be funded from various city accounts, and authorize
the Public Works Services Director to extend the contract on a month-to-month basis
thereafter until a new contract is competitively bid and awarded.
18. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a 175
Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Rancho Etiwanda
Estates Infrastructure Day Creek Storm Drain and Basin, located north of the extension of
Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by JTY Investment, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-080 I 177
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES
INFRASTRUCTURE DAY CREEK STORM DRAIN AND BASIN AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
THE WORK
19. Approval to accept the Old Town Park Renovation Project (CO 07-206) as complete, release 178
the Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond, and authorize the filing of
a Notice of Completion.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-081 179
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE OLD TOWN PARK RENOVATION
PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
_ APRIL 16, 2008
5
H. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by
law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
180
(DOUGLAS & LINDA ANDRESEN - APN: 0201-043-45 -ANNEXATION NO. 88-08-1) TO
AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT. CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION
AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED
ELECTORS
RESOLUTION NO. FD 08-014 182
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 88-08-1) TO AN EXISTING
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 88-1 ), CALLING A SPECIAL
ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF
SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS
I. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY COUNCIL
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by
law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF URGENCY ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT 188
AND OPERATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES IN ALL LAND USE
ZONES WITHIN THE CITY AND TO ADD CHAPTER 17.44 TO TITLE 17 (THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
ORDINANCE NO. 791 193
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ADDING CHAPTER 17.44 TO TITLE 17 (THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE, PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF
MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES IN ALL ZONES, AND
DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
APRIL 16, 2008
z.
includes the
$1,013,150.
- A review of the federally-required Annual Action Plan, which
selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of
6
199
3.
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
RESOLUTION NO. 08-082
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES
AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND
AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
4.
RCL/VIVJ I RVV I IVIV /1V RCCIVICIV 1 - VRVLV VU-VV I 1 1 - L/11V1/91\ VLIV 11\!ll V -
An environmental review for a Billboard Relocation and Reconstruction Agreement (CO 08-
043) to facilitate the removal of nine existing billboards and relocate one existing billboard
to a location on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Interstate 15 (12200 Arrow Route
(APN: 0229-021-65). This relocated billboard will have atwo-panel changeable message
digital display. The application also includes the reconstruction of two existing billboards
generally located near the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Foothill Avenue (9670
Foothill Boulevard (APN: 0208-153-05) and 8076 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0208-153-03).
The two existing billboards to be reconstructed will include one panel on each billboard with
a changeable message digital display. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental
impacts has been prepared for consideration.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-083
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A BILLBOARD
RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0229-021-65 (12200
ARROW ROUTE); 0208-153-05 (9670 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD); AND
0208-153-03 (8076 ARCHIBALD AVENUE)
233
235
259
261
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
_ APRIL 16, 2008
7
J. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion.
1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per
Councilmember.)
2. CONSIDERATION OF RENEWAL OF MOBILE HOME ACCORDS FOR A PERIOD OF
12
SEVEN YEARS WITH THE FOLLOWING MOBILE HOME PARKS LOCATED IN RANCHO
CUCAMONGA: ALTA LAGUNA ALTA VISTA CASA VOLANTE. CHAPARRAL
HEIGHTS. FOOTHILL MOBILE MANOR, THE PINES. SYCAMORE VILLA, AND
RAMONA VILLA
3. DISCUSSION OF THE ARMED FORCES BANNER POLICY (PowerPoint Presentation)
318
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 10, 2008,
seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic
Center Drive.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265136 3/26/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 83,330.00
AP - 00265136 3/26/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 8,055.00
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60
AP - 00265218 3/26/2008 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 83.03
AP - 00265282 3/26/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 6,633.33
AP - 00265301 3/26/2008 SAFCO CAPITAL CORP 29,265.87
AP - 00265327 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,485.68
AP - 00265338 3/26/2008 TMAD TAYLOR & GAINES 2,815.00
AP - 00265362 3/26/2008 WELLS FARGO BANK N A 2,800.00
AP - 00265392 4/2/2008 ASSI SECURITY 2,437.50
AP - 00265396 4/2/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 69,020.00
AP - 00265402 4/2/2008 BCT ENTERTAINMENT 14,661.67
AP = 00265437 4/2/2008 CIVIC PLUS 17,600.00
AP - 00265443 4/2/2008 CONWAY DATA INC 7,250.00
AP - 00265445 4/2/2008 CORENET GLOBAL 4,335.00
AP - 00265473 4/2/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 8728
AP - 00265473 4/2/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 29.63
AP - 00265477 4/2/2008 GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS INC 6,700.00
AP - 00265481 4/2/2008 HARRISON, IOY 1,050.00
AP - 00265482 4/2/2008 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 1,640.95
AP - 00265482 4/2/2008 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 9,947.50
AP - 00265487 4/2/2008 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 72,954.23
AP - 00265493 4/2/2008 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CEN" 50.00
AP - 00265509 4/2/2008 LIM & NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORP 2],921.05
AP - 00265516 4/2/2008 LVH ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS 28,709.86
AP - 00265537 4/2/2008 NEW LEGACY CORPORATION 840.45
AP - 00265537 4/2/2008 NEW LEGACY CORPORATION -84.05
AP - 00265537 4/2/2008 NEW LEGACY CORPORATION 53,265.00
AP - 00265537 4/2/2008 NEW LEGACY CORPORATION -5,326.50
AP - 00265542 4/2/2008 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. 406.97
AP - 00265571 4/2/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 13.47
AP - 00265609 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTI 2,891.96
AP - 00265609 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTI 2,839.33
Total for Check ID AP: 448,884.41
Total for Entity: 448,884.41
P1
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Curren[ Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:04:1
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Investments Par
Value Market
Value Book
Value % of
Portfolio
Term Days to
Maturity YTM
360 Equiv. YTM
365 Equiv.
Local Agency Investment FUnd 34,173,734.54 34,113,134.54 34,173,134.54 18.43 1 1 3.725 3.777
CalTmst Short-Term Fund (JPA) 10,029,592.59 10,029,592.59 70,029,592.59 5.42 1 1 2.811 2.850
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 136,000,000.00 137,711,602.24 135,936,750.00 73.45 1,435 1,721 4.222 4.281
Treasury Secunlies-Coupon 5,000,000.00 5,145,312.50 5,002,343.75 2.70 681 333 4.654 4.719
185,142,727.13 166,999,641.87 185,081,820.86 100.00% 1,072 832 4.066 4.122
Investments
Cash and Accrued Interest
Passbook/Checking
(not included in yield calculations)
Accrued Interest at Purchase
Subtotal
Total Cash and Investments
373,874.68
185,516,602.01
373,874.88
7,861.11
381,735.99
187,381,377.66
373,874.88
7,861.11
381,735.99
185,463,556.87
1
1,o7z
1 0.197 0.200
832 4.066 4.122
Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 659,364.01 5,638,660.95
Average Daily Balance 185,153,630.64 164,933,394.00
Effective Rate of Return 4.19% 4.54%
I certify that this report accurately reflects all Agency pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy adopted December 19, 2007. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash Flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values
were obtained from (IDC) -Interactive Data Corporation pricing service.
The attached Summary of RDA 20 2004 & 2007 Tax Allocation Bonds as of current month end and Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of fhe prior month's end is provided
under the Cit ~ In tmen Polic T ov ions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these funds.
John Illison, Treasu r
Reporting period 03I01I2008-03/31/2008
Run Date: 04I09/200a -17:11
PoMolio RDA
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept 6.41.202b
Report Ver. 500
N
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
March 31, 2008
Page 2
Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Maturity Date
Local Agency Investment Fund
SYS145 145 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 34,113,134.54 34,113,134.54 34,713,134.54 3.777 3.725 1
Subtotal antl Average 76,116,360.35 34,117,134.54 3d,113,136.54 34,113,134.54 7.725 1
CalTrust Short•Tenn Fund (JPA)
SYS1007 1007 CALTRUST SHORT-TERM FUND 0226/2008 10,029,592.59 10,029,592.59 10,029,592.59 2.850 2.811 1
Subtotal and Average 10,003,642.88 10,029,592.59 10,029,592.59 10,029,592.59 2.811 1
Certificates of DeposiVNeg: Bank
Subtotal antl Average 1,419,354.84
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon
31331YPL8 1002 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/24/2008 5,000,000.00 5,076,562.50 5,000,000.00 3.750 3.699 1,028 01/24/2011
313310M79 911 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/03/2003 3,000,000.00 3,003,750.00 3,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 63 06/03/2008
31331XA36 982 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,203,437.50 3,000,000.00 5.050 4.981 1,149 05/25/2011
3133XP4P6 1001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/22/2008 5,000,000.00 5,051,562.50 5,000,000.00 3.600 3.551 1,207 07/222011
3133XPN6 1011 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0221/2008 5,000,000.00 5,042,187.50 5,000,000.00 3.500 3.453 1,329 11/21/2011
3133XOAG7 1013 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/122008 5,000,000.00 5,046,875.00 5,000,000.00 3.350 3.305 1,350 1212/2011
3133XOGC0 1015 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/24/2008 3,000,000.00 3,018,750.00 3,000,000.00 3.250 3.206 1,361 1223/2011
3133XJVL9 967 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0213/2007 3,000,000.00 3,191,250.00 3,000,000.00 5.000 4.929 1,074 03/11/2011
3133XKUH6 981 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/24/2007 4,000,000.00 4,070,000.00 3,984,000.00 5.150 5.190 1,148 05/24/2011
3133XL304 984 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/29/2007 3,000,000.00 3,110,625.00 3,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 1,519 05/29/2012
3133XLAH6 986 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/18/2007 2,000,000.00 2,015,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.600 5.523 1,539 06/18/2012
3133XLAF0 987 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/20/2007 1,000,000.00 1,007,500.00 1,000,000.00 5.600 5.523 1,541 06/20/2012
3133XLBS1 988 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,022,500.00 3,000,000.00 5.500 5.425 815 06/25/2010
3133XMS77 990 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/01/2007 2,000,000.00 2,031,875.00 2,000,000.00 4.870 4.803 1,311 11/03/2011
3133XNVE6 997 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/03/2008 3,000,000.00 3,035,625.00 3,000,000.00 4.500 4.440 1,280 10/03/2011
3133XNVZ9 998 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/07/2008 2,000,000.00 2,022,500.00 2,000,000.00 4.375 4.317 1,284 10/07/2011
3128X7CU6 1016 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 03/26/2008 5,000,000.00 5,026,394.66 5,000,000.00 3.250 3.205 1,455 03/26/2012
3128X1BD8 903 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 5,007,039.64 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 48 05/19/2008
3128X1JD0 914 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 06/122003 3,000,000.00 3,003,471.22 2,999,100.00 3.030 2.995 71 06/11/2008
3128X3FZ7 946 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/26/2004 3,000,000.00 3,006,723.17 2,993,700.00 4.000 4.002 52 05/23/2008
3128X5R75 971 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 03/20/2007 1,000,000.00 1,011,752.93 998,300.00 5.250 5.217 1,444 03/15/2012
3128XSR75 973 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/04/2007 2,000,000.00 2,023,505.86 1,995,600.00 5.250 5.228 1,444 03/15/2012
3128XSK80 979 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/10/2007 5,000,000.00 5,068,795.01 5,000,000.00 5.400 5.324 1,431 03/022012
3128X60R0 991 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 11/19/2007 2,500,000.00 2,536,877.55 2,500,000.00 4.500 4.438 597 11/19/2009
3128XBRV0 993 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 1203/2007 2,500,000.00 2,530,967.33 2,500,000.00 4.320 4.261 976 1203/2010
Run Dete: 04/092008 - 17:11
PoMolio RDA
CP
PM IPRF_PM2)6ymRept641.202b ~
W
RepoM1 Var. 5.00
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
March 31, 2008
Page 3
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rata Mootly's 760 Maturity Date
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
3128X6UA2 994 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 12/17/2007 5,000,000.00 5,062,529.76 4,994,450.00 4.250 4.231 990 12/17/2010
3128X6YG5 999 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 01/09/2008 5,000,000.00 5,082,495.11 5,000,000.00 4.250 4.192 1,378 01/09/2012
31398ANC2 1009 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/11/2008 5,000,000.00 5,025,000.00 4,993,000.00 3.125 3.131 1,046 02/11/2011
3136FB4J7 1010 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/14/2008 5,000,000.00 5,045,312.50 5,000,000.00 3.625 3.575 1414 02/14/2012
31398ANH1 1012 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/07/2008 5,000,000.00 5,031,250.00 4,997,500.00 3.250 3.223 1,060 02/25/2011
3136F9BY8 1014 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/12/2008 5,000,000.00 5,057,812.50 5,000,000.00 3.550 3.501 1,441 03/12/2012
3136F8LU7 976 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,014,062.50 4,996,250.00 5.250 5.199 1,133 05/09/2011
31398ABC5 977 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/09/2007 3,000,000.00 3,057,187.50 2,998,500.00 5.300 5.239 1,497 05/07/2012
31398ABC5 980 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/21!2007 1,000,000.00 1,019,082.50 997,000.00 5.300 5.296 1,497 05/07/2012
31398ACL4 983 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/29/2007 4,000,000.00 4,018,750.00 4,000,000.00 5.500 5.425 1,519 05/29/2012
31398ADF6 985 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/12/2007 4,000,000.00 4,027,500.00 3,995,600.00 5.600 5.548 1,533 06/12/2012
31398AJK9 989 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 11/05/2007 3,000,000.00 3,041,250.00 3,000,000.00 4.750 4.685 948 11/05/2010
31398AKV3 995 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/28/2007 5,000,000.00 5,064,062.50 5,000,000.00 4.400 4.340 995 12/22/2010
Subtotal and Average 131,517,879.03 176,000,000.00 137,711,602.24 135,936,750.00 d.222 1,121
Federal Agency Issues -Discount
Subtotal and Average 643,826.52
Treasury Securities -Coupon
912828GJ3 978
TREASURY NOTE
05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,145,312.50 5,002,343.75 4.750
5,002,347.75 5,000,000.00 5,145,312.50 5,002,343.75
4.654 333 02/28/2009
Run Date: 04/09/2006 -17:11
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
185,157,630.64 185,142,727.13 186,999,641.87 185,081,820.88
4.654 337
4.066 872
Portfolio RDA
CP
PM (PRF PM2) SymRept 6.41.202b ~
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Cash
March 31, 2008
Page 4
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to
CUSIP Investment p Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Maturity
SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts
SYS144 144 BANK OF AMERICA 373,674.88 373,674.66 373,674.66 0.200 0.197 1
Average Balance 0.00 AaNed Interest at Purchase 7,661.11 7,661.11 7
- Subtotal 381,735.99 381,735.99
Total Cash and lnvestmen[ss 185,153,630.64
185,516,602.01 187,381,377.86 185,463,556.87
4.066 832
Run Date: 04/092008 - 17:11
Portfolio RDA
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 3ymRept 6.41.202D ~
(Jt
m
a
i
C C
9
C q
Wm
w
C
C
W
O
N
d
y
~
G
Q
~
++ ~
e.
M ~
a
a~i
~ t
v
d
d ~ ~~
~ m
pf
c
~ 7
~
•~
O _
•' Y q
Q
~ V Q
Q O A
~
3
o O
a N
~
"
L
V L
` y
C
m
c
ab0
y y
C W
O_
6 A
E n
m ~J
d3
~ ~
O
a
n
i
0 0 o
O O O
O O O
O O
0 0
0 0
Q
I
0 0 0
0 o n
O O Q
0 o m
O O tD
O ' N
o c
I
i
N '
N
m
N
O
O
old o
O O
O'. O
O
0
I o
O
°n' o
dl o
m
N
° o °
o o,
O O
n~
y
y
TI
~I
I
i
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i
O
O I
V
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Q O
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ry
O 0
0 0
O O O 0
O t~ n
° 0
°
° 0 m m '
o o
0
O N N N 1"1 1"1
0
0 o b o 0 0 0 0
0
o I
o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o' o o °
0 0 0 0 0 0
' 0 0
0
O O O YI O 0
N
O O O h O 1~
O T'
O O O m
N CI y p N N
I N.
ri
M
0
y
V
m
N
a
m
r
a
m
~ I ~ ~
I m m
y 0 10
i I~ A A
I
I
°o °o °
0 o ti
n
I I I I
0 00000000 ~ I
~ N N O N N N N N N N
~ N a N N 0? O O
I O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
.d. n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
m h ~ in i o a in .n in .n y .n N y o
A m m N N l7 N N N N P y N
l7 I N N N M M l7 l7 l7 In N O
I
u~~ m °o y °o 2~ n rv
N
m '. N O S W 0 A N N
°f O oil o~ n m~ o uo
Y Y U (7
Z e0i LL O ~ Q m m Q Q O Z Z Z N Q r N P
LL ~ i O H H m m~ N N N ' ~
~ W LL O O Z 2 2 a a a Z
v v ~ o 0 0~ r r I o i~ a
~ E ~ N U
„ ~ ~ o i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ I E w
E Z 9 N 3 Y 1: a s o_ o_ o_ a a a ~ o ff ~. 3 E ~ 3
~ a °,I > ; m ~, QLLQ Q~Q QQ QQ QQ Q~Q Q~< ~ ~i ~ ~I ~ u~ LL
N N K m Z N K K K K K K K~ y T O
`y T Q f. U W W W W W W W W W m m L_ Y m
~ U ~ ~ ^ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ O Z
y L U a Z W W W W W W W W W C a
y ~ U ~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O m
O I
~ c c ~ I 19
a 9 Q N O J C
d j ~ m. 7 b ~ O
LL ~ a OI O 6 V
C 1~ ~ 0 U Ct N (D N O O fO O G
E ~ lL o a °o I~ m m o `o 0 0 0 ~ o° (j j e
_ E c > > o
~ H 0 T T y
~ N
U 0 O 0 d d b
L y
0 N v v Ol o y n o o ~ y o O] N ~
~ b n N u Q S>j O Q CU9 J S} 3 Q O ~ N
1 Q a I~ o ~ t.- U m F K Q Q n Q m m ~ ~ N C
H u m _~ m C n '~ N N m m m rn~ e a n m > m
~ O Y A } d yo d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `n n n d ~ d N Y
U J m i U m ~ U m '~ LL N N n N N m ~n n ~ LL m F y N
m
q
m
e
0
~ UP6g
o
o a S
d E rc
y
E
a
a
E
a
8
Y
0
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended February 29, 2008
Trustee andlor Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue Paving Agent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value
96 Housing Set-Aside Tax Bank of New York Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/30/2002 VARIOUS 2.00% $ 454.59
Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/30/2006 VARIOUS 2.00% 366.62
Housing Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 3/12/2002 VARIOUS 2.00% 0.50
$ 841.71
07 Housing Set-Aside Tax Wells Fargo Cost of Issuance Fund Money Market Funds 12/31/2007 N/A' 2.73% $ 47,616.51
Interest Fund Money Market Funds 2/29/2008 N/A' 2.74% 2,045,858.79
$ 2,093,475.30
01 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Reserve Fund Money Market Funds 8/22/2001 N/A' 2.15% $ 7,371,529.03
Principal Fund Money Market Funds 8/31/2005 N/A' 2.15% 7.71
Interest Fund Money Market Funds 8/31/2005 N/A' 2.15% 1,860,621.88
Special Fund Money Market Funds 9/30/2005 N/A' 2.15% 16,438.20
$ 9,250,596.82
99 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Interest Fund Money Market Funds 2/28/2005 N/A' 2.15% $ 1,036,657.50
Principal Fund Money Market Funds 8/31/2005 N/A' 2.16% 2,679.56
Special Fund Money Market Funds 9/30/2005 N/A' 2.15% 3.23
$ 1,039,340.29
04 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Reserve Fund Investment Agreement 12/6/2004 8/27/2032 5.07% $ 12,938,491.70
Interest Fund Money Market Funds 2/28/2005 N/A' 2.15% 3,763,592.90
Principal Fund Money Market Funds 8/31/2005 N/A' 2.15% 1,532.61
Special Fund Money Market Funds 9l30/2D05 N/A' 2.13% 843.21
$ 16,704,460.42
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS 5 29,088,714.54
' Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand
V
RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value PoMOlio Term Matunry J60 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Treasury Securities-BEGS 7,375,020.00 7,375,020.00 7,375,020.00 35.63 359 102 4.905 4.973
Treasury Securities-BEGS Demantl 13,325,514.23 13,325,514.23 13,325,514.23 64.37 1 1 2.925 2.965
20,700,534.23 20,700,534.23 20,700,534.23 100.00% 129 37 3.630 3.681
Investments
Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 65,139.66 705,775.03
Average Daily Balance 20,705,909.71 21,134,132.12
Effective Rate of Return 3.70°/ 4.43%
This report accurately reflects the investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Project 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds proceeds in accordance with the Agency's supplemental indenture dated
August 1, 2001. The Investment Program herein shown provides suffcient cash Flow liquidity to meet the public improvements schedule and funding requirements.
Reporting period 03101/2008-0313112008 Portfolio TAB
CP
Run Dale: 04/09/2006-1]:13 PM (PRF PM1)SymRepi 6.41.202b J
Report Ver. 5.00 ~
RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
March 31, 2008
Page 2
Average Purchase Slaled YTM Days to Matudty
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Dale Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Matudty Date
Treasury Securities -SLGS
535584200 134 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,860.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 5.000 5.000 4 04/05/2008
535585190 135 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 1,241,660.00 4.990 4.990 34 05/05/2008
S35585220 136 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 1,241,680.00 1,241,680.00 1,241,680.00 4.980 4.980 65 06/05/2008
535586010 137 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.970 4.970 95 07/05/2008
S35586120 138 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.980 4.963 126 08/05/2008
535566550 139 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.960 4.965 157 09/05/2008
535586660 140 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 608,330.00 608,330.00 4.960 4.966 187 10/05/2008
535586670 141 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,330.00 808,330.00 608,330.00 4.930 4.936 218 11/05/2008
535586800 142 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 608,370.00 608,370.00 608,370.00 4.930 4.934 248 12/05!2008
Suhtotal antl Average 7,535,234.19 7,375,020.00 7,375,020.00 7,775,020.00 4.973 102
Checking Account
SYS125 125 BANK OF AMERICA 07/01/2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 1
Subtotal and Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0
Treasury Securities -SLGS Demand
SYS143 143 TREASURY SLGS 07/19/2007 3,164,872.41 3,164,872.41 3,164,872.41 3.840 3.840 1
SYS144 144 TREASURY SLGS 09/11/2007 1 403,231.88 1,403,231.68 1,403,231.88 3.450 3.450 1
SVS745 145 TREASURY SLGS 10/05/2007 1,857,409.94 1,857,409.94 1,857,409.94 3.200 3.200 1
SVSt46 146 TREASURY SLGS 11/05/2007 1,800,000.00 1,800,000.00 1,800,000.00 3.080 3.080 1
SYS147 147 TREASURY SLGS 12/05/2007 7,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 2.490 2.490 1
SYS148 148 TREASURY SLG$ 01/07/2008 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 2.580 2.580 1
575149 149 TREASURY SLGS 02/05/2008 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1.820 1.820 1
SYS150 150 TREASURY SLGS 03/05/2008 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1.680 1.660 1
Subtotal antl Average 17,170,675.52 17,325,514.23 13,325,514.23 17,325,514.23 2.965 1
Total and Average 20,705,909.71 20,700,574.23 20,700,534.2) 20,700,574.23 7.681 77
Portfolio TAB
CP
Run Data'. O4I09/2008 - 17:13
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6 41.202b
Report Ver. 5.00
RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management Page3
Activity By Type
March 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Retlemptions Entling
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withtlrawals Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary)
Subtotal 0.00 0.00
Treasury Securities -SLGS
535563700 133 TREASURY SLGS 5.010 03/05/2006 0.00 1,241,660.00
Subtotal 8,616,660.00 0.00 1,247,660.00 7,375,020.00
Checking Account (Monthly Summary)
Subtotal 0.00
0.00
Treasury Securities -SLGS Demand (Monthly Summary)
SYS150 150 TREASURY SLGS 1.660 1,200,000.00 0.00
Subtotal t2,125,514.2J 1,200,000.00 0.00 13,325,514.23
Total 20,742,194.23 1,200,000.00 1,241,660.00 20,700,534.23
PoMolio TAB
CI ~
Run Oele: 041092006 -1 T 13 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRapt 6.41.20: ~
Report Ver. 5.00
RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Matudry 360 Equiv. 368 Equiv.
Local Agency lnvesVneni Funtl 149,183.48 149,183.48 149,183.48 0.20 1 1 3.725 3.777
Wells Fargo Money Market FUntl 73,885,126.33 73,885,126.33 73,885,126.33 99.80 1 1 1.302 1.320
74,034,309.81 74,034,309.81 74,034,309.81 100.00% 1 1 '1.307 1.325
Investments
Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 159,638.31 1,834,477.66
Average Daily Balance 73,926,477.48 77,160,025.05
Effective Rate of Return 2.54% 3.16
This report accurately reflects the investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Project 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds proceeds in accordance with the Agency's supplemental indenture dated
March 31, 2004. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the public improvements schedule and funding requirements.
Reporting period 03I01I20 0 8-0 313 7 /20 0 8
Run Date: O4I092008 -17:15
Portfolio TAB4
CP
PM (PRF_PM1)6ymRep1641.202b ~
Report Ver. 5.00 f
RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
March 31, 2008
Paget
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date
Local Agency Investment Fund
SVS401 401 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 149,183.48 149,183.48 149,183.48 3.777 3.777 1
Subtotal antl Average 149,183.48 149,183.48 149,183.48 149,183.48 3.777 1
Wells Fargo Money Market Fund
SYS405 405 WELLS FARGO 73,885,126.33 73,885,126.33 73,885,126.33 1.320 1.320 1
Subtotal antl Average 73,777,286.00 73,885,126.73 77,885,126.33 77,885,126.73 7.320 1
Total and Average 73,926,471.48
Run Date. Oa109R00a - 17:15
74,074,309.81 74,034,309.81 74,034,309.81
1.325 1
Portfolio TAB4
CP
PM (PRF_PM216ymRept641.202b ~
r
N
Repon Var. 5.00
RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
March 7, 2008 through March 31, 2008
Beginning Stated Tronsactlon Purchases Redemp0ons Ending
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
Page3
local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary)
Subtotal 149,183.48 149,183.48
Wells Fargo Money Market Fund (Monthly Summary)
SYS405 405 WELLS FARGO 1.320 111,432.94 0.00
Subtotal 73,773,693.39 111,432.94 0.00 73,885,126.33
Total 7J,922,876.87 111,432.94 0.00 74,034,309.81
Portfolio TAB4
C ~
Run Date: 04109/2008 -17:15 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept 6.41.20: W
Repot Ver. 5.00
RDA 2007 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Tertn Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Local Agency InvesUnent Funds 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 100.00 1 t 3.725 3.777
Investments
77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 77,763,416.76 700.00% 1
3.725 3.777
Total Earnings March 37 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 274,068.27 1,158,284.34
Average Daily Balance 77,783,416.76
Effective Rate of Re[urn 4.15%
This report accurately renects the investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Project Housing Set-Aside Tax Allocation Bonds Taxable 2007 Series B proceeds in accordance with the
Agency's indenture dated December 1, 2007. The Investment Program herein shown provides suffcient cash Flow liquidity to meet the public improvements schedule and funding requirements.
Reporting period 03IO1I2008-03I31I2008
Run Oate: 04/092006 - 11:16
Portfolio TAB7
CP
PM (PRF_PMi) SymRepl6.41.202b
Report Ver. 5.00
~_
A
RDA 2007 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management page z
Portfolio Details -Investments
March 31, 2008
Average Purchase Statetl YTM YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
Local Agency Investment FUnds
SYS701 701 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT 17J05/2007 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 77,763,416.78 3.777 3.725 3.777 1
Subtotal antl Average 77,783,416.76 77,783,416.76 77,763,416.76 77,763,416.76 3.725 3.777 1
Total antl Average 77,783,416.76 77,763,416.76 77,783,416.76 77,763,416.76
Run Date: 04/09/2006 -1]:16
3.726 3.777 1
Portfolio TA67
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRep16.41.202b ~
f
fP
Repon Ver. 5.00
RDA 2007 Tax Allocation Bonds
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
March 7, 2008 through March 37, 2008
CUSIP InvestmentN Issuer
Beginning Statetl Transaction Purchases Retlemptions
Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Wlthtlrawals
Entling
Balance
Page 3
Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary)
Subtotal 77,783,416.76
77,783,416.76
Total 77,783,416.76 0.00 0.00 77,783,d16.76
Run Dete: 04/092006 -1716
Portfolio TAB7
C ~
1
PM IPRF_PM3) SymRep16.41.20 ~
Report Ver. 5.00
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date: April 16, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager
By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent
.~
~~
RANCHO
G'UCAMONGA
Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ASSI
SECURITY TO CONTINUE AS A SINGLE SOURCE VENDOR FOR THE REPAIR,
MAINTENANCE AND UPGRADE OF ACCESS CONTROL AND RELATED SECURITY
SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $140,000 ANNUALLY TO BE FUNDED
FROM VARIOUS CITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACCOUNTS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency and City Council approve and authorize a Professional
Services Agreement with ASST Security to continue as a single source vendor for the repair, maintenance and
upgrade of access control and related security services in the amount not to exceed $140,000 annually to be
funded from various City and Redevelopment Agency accounts.
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
ASSI Security of Irvine, California is the provider of keyless entry hardware and maintenance for the system
that replaced our old "Card Key' system several years ago. The current fiscal year budget includes funding
for ongoing repair and maintenance throughout the City as well as a small capital project to improve and
expand the system at the R.C. Family Sports Center. We typically expend $40k to $50k annually for upkeep,
repair and minor upgrades to the system. However, this year we have experienced increased repairs,
remodeling, and upgrades, making it necessary to repair and/or augment the security system(s) at various
facilities. Although we have not yet exceeded the $50k annual expenditure limit, we are rapidly approaching
an emergency situation with delayed projects at Animal Care, the RC Family Sports Center, Cultural Arts
Center and the new RC Resource Center which combined will easily put us over the limit.
There is adequate funding in the various City and Agency accounts and we do not anticipate a request for
additional appropriations at this time. With the extremely critical nature of these security systems, their
relation to the protection of the City's facilities and occupants, the need for consistent confidentiality, the fact
that it is a citywide security system and the history of excellent service and competitive pricing, we
recommend that City Council designate ASSI as the single source provider far access control and related
security services.
jspectfully Submitt~:
Dave Blevins ,!'\v/\U//,/
Public Works Maintenance Manager
P17
DB:TO:jau
P18
STAFF REPORT - T
RANCHO QJCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY
RANCHO
Date: April 16, 2008 G'UCAMONGA
To: Chairman and Members of Redevelopment Agency
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director
From: Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Director
By: Robert Karatsu, Assistant Library Director
Subject: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT QUOTES AND AUTHORIZE AND EXECUTE CONTRACTS
TO G/M BUSINESS INTERIORS UTILIZING A SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $73,414.04 PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE
AMOUNT OF $7,341 AND TO YAMADA ENTERPRISES UTILIZING A CMAS
CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $194,259 PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE
AMOUNT OF $19,425 FOR FURNITURE AND LIBRARY BOOK SHELVES FOR THE
ARCHIBALD LIBRARY REMODEL PROJECT TO BE FUNDED BY AN
APPROPRIATION FROM FUND 640 FUND BALANCE TO ACCOUNT NO.
2640801 /5606.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve to accept quotes and authorize and
execute contracts to G/M Business Interiors in the amount of $73,414.04 plus a 10 percent
contingency in the amount of $7,341 and to Yamada Enterprises in the amount of $194,259 plus a
10 percent contingency in the amount of $19,425 for furniture and library book shelves for the
Archibald Library Remodel Project to be funded by an appropriation from Fund 640 Fund Balance
to Account No. 2640801/5606.
Background
At the Agency meeting of April 2, 2008, the Agency awarded the construction contract for the
Archibald Library Remodel Project. To support the new areas created by the remodel, additional
book shelves and furniture are needed. In addition, much of the existing furniture in the Archibald
Library is over fourteen years old and through heavy use and wear, needs replacement.
The Library has used both G/M Business Interiors and Yamada Enterprises for book shelves and
furniture at the Biane Library at Victoria Gardens and are very pleased with both their product lines
and their service. Using existing CMAS (California Multiple Award Schedules) contracts, the City is
able to get the highest discounts available for these products. It should also be noted that the
Agency has allocated the necessary funds to pay for the 1.9 percent CMAS contract fee when it
becomes due.
Respectfully submitted,
Deborah Kaye Clark
Library Director
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265068 3/26/2008 ABLETRONICS 19.34
AP - 00265074 3/26/2008 AIRGAS WEST 66.85
AP - 00265074 3/26/2008 AIRGAS WEST 64.95
AP - 00265074 3/26/2008 AIRGAS WEST 66.85
AP - 00265074 3/26/2008 AIRGAS WEST 58.95
AP - 00265075 3/26/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 75.37
AP - 00265085 3/26/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 917.33
AP - 00265097 3/26/2008 BILL EMMERSON FOR ASSEMBLY 35.00
AP - 00265097 3/26/2008 BILL EMMERSON FOR ASSEMBLY 35.00
AP - 00265097 3/26/2008 BILL EMMERSON FOR ASSEMBLY 35.00
AP - 00265097 3/26/2008 BILL EMMERSON FOR ASSEMBLY 35.00
AP - 00265110 3/26/2008 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 10.48
AP - 00265110 3/26/2008 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 52.42
AP - 00265121 3/26/2008 COMPRESSED AIR SPECIALTIES ~ 511.89
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00265156 3/26/2008 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 176.71
AP - 00265170 3/26/2008 FIRE MAINTENANCE COMPANY LLC 882.00
AP - 00265177 3/26/2008 GENERAL SERVICES ADMIN. 1,654.94
AP - 00265194 3/26/2008 HILLCREST NURSERY 19.37
AP - 00265222 3/26/2008 LANDORF, RICHARD 160.00
AP - 00265224 3/26/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 27.00
AP - 00265224 3/26/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,512.00
AP - 00265224 3/26/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,523.00
AP - 00265224 3/26/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,294.00
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 32.11
AP - 00265235 3/26/2008 MATTHEW BENDER AND CO. INC. 48.28
AP - 00265248 3/26/2008 NAUSHA, CHRISTEN 1,067.01
AP - 00265260 3/26/2008 OLSON, BUZZ 130.00
AP - 00265292 3/26/2008 RESCUE RESPONSE GEAR LLC 72.04
AP - 00265295 3/26/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,027.50
AP - 00265305 3/26/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 425.00
AP - 00265305 3/26/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 425.00
AP - 00265305 3/26/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 425.00
AP - 00265305 3/26/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 425.00
AP - 00265320 3/26/2008 SMART AND FINAL 15.57
AP - 00265323 3/26/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 599.02
AP - 00265323 3/26/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 934.91
AP - 00265323 3/26/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 313.38
AP - 00265323 3/26/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 255.32
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,584.65
AP - 00265342 3/26/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.82
AP - 00265342 3/26/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.82
P19
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P20
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 99.57
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 119.80
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 32.77
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 19.71.
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 26.11
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 59.14
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 46.08
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 32.77
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 39.43
AP - 00265370 3/26/2008 WIRELESS MOBILEDATA ],791.09
AP - 00265389 4/2/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 391.80
AP - 00265389 4/2/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 874.80
AP - 00265389 4/2/2008 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 2,430.00
AP - 00265399 4/2/2008 BALL, ROBERT 50.00
AP - 00265407 4/2/2008 BIA SC 75.00
AP - 00265410 4/2/2008 BROCK, DON 24.77
AP - 00265435 4/2/2008 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 25.44
AP - 00265440 4/2/2008 COMPRESSED AIR SPECIALTIES 286.61
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.68
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 369.75
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 187.96
AP - 00265452 4/2/2008 DAPPER TIRE CO 750.84
AP - 00265467 4/2/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 15.06
AP - 00265468 4/2/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 450.57
AP - 00265468 4/2/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 295.00
AP - 00265468 4/2/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 295.00
AP - 00265468 4/2/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 450.57
AP - 00265468 4/2/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 431.73
AP - 00265471 4/2/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 335.78
AP - 00265471 4/2/2008 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 1,459.99
AP - 00265474 4/2/2008 GIONET, ARMAND 274.94
AP - 00265486 4/2/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 19.37
AP - 00265494 4/2/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 1 11.98
AP - 00265501 4/2/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 134.69
AP - 00265501 4/2/2008 KME FIRE APPARATUS 89.67
AP - 00265508 4/2/2008 LIFE ASSIST INC 197.39
AP - 00265512 4/2/2008 LN CURTIS AND SONS 49.30
AP - 0026551 S 4/2/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 251.47
AP - 0026551 S 4/2/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 92.84
AP - 00265515 4/2/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 91.03
AP - 00265515 4/2/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 255.37
AP - 00265515 4/2/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 45.90
AP - 00265515 4/2/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC -46.98
AP - 0026551 S 4/2/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 20.96
AP - 0026551 S 4/2/2008 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 742.13
AP - 00265517 4/2/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 755.29
AP - 00265517 4/2/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 171.08
AP - 00265532 4/2/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 50.62
AP - 00265532 4/2/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 207.36
AP - 00265533 4/2/2008 NATIONAL CODE SERVICES ASSOCIATION 50.00
AP - 00265533 4/2/2008 NATIONAL CODE SERVICES ASSOCIATION 50.00
AP - 00265533 4/2/2008 NATIONAL CODE SERVICES ASSOCIATION 50.00
AP - 00265533 4/2/2008 NATIONAL CODE SERVICES ASSOCIATION 50.00
AP - 00265533 4/2/2008 NATIONAL CODE SERVICES ASSOCIATION 50.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:05:0
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265536 4/2/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 160.00
AP - 00265536 4/2/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 160.00
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 113.70
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 12.43
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 12.63
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 92.49
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 259.84
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 2.36
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -5.32
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 158.13
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 6.98
AP - 00265547 4/2/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 9,396.00
AP - 00265547 4/2/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 7,516.80
AP - 00265547 4/2/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 1,879.20
AP - 00265547 4/2/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 58,343.38
AP - 00265547 4/2/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 46,674.70
AP - 00265547 4/2/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 11,668.67
AP - 00265565 4/2/2008 PROULX, PATRICK 42.88
AP - 00265566 4/2/2008 QUALITY TRUCK ELECTRIC INC 594.00
AP - 00265568 4/2/2008 RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING INC 24.50
AP - 00265587 4/2/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY EMS OFFICERS 90.00
AP - 00265588 4/2/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE/HAZ MAT 220.00
AP - 00265590 4/2/2008 SC FUELS 4,092.37
AP - 00265598 4/2/2008 SMITTY'S DIESEL REPAIR 6,791.47
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 162.48
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 43.09
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 590.22
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 590.21
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 853.33
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,29].85
AP - 00265622 4/2/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 37.00
AP - 00265622 4/2/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 48.75
AP - 00265622 4/2/2008 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 37.00
AP - 00265636 4/2/2008 VERIZON BUSINESS 8.00
AP - 00265637 4/2/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 82.14
AP - 00265637 4/2/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 58.40
AP - 00265637 4/2/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 91.53
AP - 00265637 4/2/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 160.54
AP - 00265637 4/2/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 71.34
AP - 00265637 4/2/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 763.80
AP - 00265637 4/2/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 122.47
AP - 00265637 4/2/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 667.64
AP - 00265638 4/2/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 35.25
AP - 00265638 4/2/2008 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 35.29
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 34.56
AP - 00265642 4/2/2008 WALKER, JANET 49.18
AP - 00265642 4/2/2008 WALKER, JANET 39.21
AP - 00265642 4/2/2008 WALKER, JANET 11.18
AP - 00265642 4/2/2008 WALKER, JANET 7.50
AP - 00265642 4/2/2008 WALKER, JANET 11.00
Total for Check H) AP: 189,814.22
Total for Entity: 189,814.22
P21
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:05:0
R. C. Fire Protection District
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Par Market Book hot Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 3611 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Local Agency InvesVnent Fund 8,864,908.64 8,864,908.64 6,864,906.84 81.60 1 ~ 1 3.725 3.777
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 2,000,000.00 2,006,875.00 1,999,000.00 18 40 731 408 5.061 5.152
10,864,908.84 10,871,783.84 10,863,908.84 100.00% 135 76 3.975 4.030
Investments
Cash
Passtaok/Checking 514,803.59 514,803.59 514,803.59 1 1 0.197 0.200
(not inclutled in yieltl calculations)
Total Cash and Investments 11,379,712.43 11,366,587.43 11,378,712.43 135 76 3.975 4.030
Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 42,960.31 366,829.76
Average Daily Balance 11,888,644.38 9,964,902.43
Effective Rate of Return 4.25% 4.89%
I certify that this report accurately reflects all District pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy adopted December 19, 2007. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrati rtment. The a ~estment rogram herein shown provides suffcient cash flow liquidity to meet the nett six months estimated expenditures. The attached State of California
Pooled Money Inve'~ `~`~nt ~4ccou IF stat~me R prdvided under the City and State official Investment Policy and represents the monthly source of valuation for the prior month's end.
John R. Gillison, Treasurer
Reporting period 03101/2008-03131/2008
Run Data: 04I09200a - 17:21
Portfolio FIRE
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) SymRepl6 41.2Ma
- Report Ver. 5.00
N
N
R. C. Fire Protection District
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
March 31, 2008
Page 2
Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days to Ma[udty
CUSIP Investmen[# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 760 Maturity Date
Local Agency Investment Fund
SYS0001 0001 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 8,864,908.64 8,864,908.84 8,864,908.84 3.777 3.725 1
Subtotal and Average 9,707,618.52 8,864,908.84 8,864,908.84 8,864,908.84 3.725 1
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
3133XKT96 1008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/14/2007 2,000,000.00 2,008,875.00 1,999,000.00 5.125 5.081 408 05/14/2009
Subtotal and Average 1,999,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,006,875.00 1,999,000.00 5.081 408
Total and Average 11,888,644.78 10,864,908.84 10,871,787.84 10,867,908.84 3.975 76
Run Data'. 04I09Y200a - 7 ]:21
Portfolio FIRE
CP
PM (PRF_PM2)SymRepl6412025 ~
N
W
Report Ver. 5.00
R. C. Fire Protection District
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Cash
March 37, 2008
Page 3
Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days to
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Maturity
PassbooklChecking Accounts
SYS0002 0002 BANK OF AMERICA 514,803.59 514,803.59 514,603.59 0.200 0.197 1
Average Balance 0.00 1
Total Cash antl Investments 11,888,644.78
11,379,712.43 11,386,587.dJ 11,378,712.43
7.976 76
Run Dale: 04I09I200B - 17:21
Portfolio FIRE
CP
PM (PRF PM2) SymRep16.41.202b N
R. C. Fire Protection District
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
March 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008
Page 4
Beglnning Stated Transaction Purchases Retlemptions Entling
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Wlthtlrawals Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary)
SYS0001 0001 LOCAL AGENCYINVESTMENT FUND 3.777 0.00 1,000,000.00
Subtotal 9,864,908.84 0.00 1,000,000.00 8,664,908.84
Passbook/Checking Accounts (Monthly Summary)
SVS0002 0002 BANK OF AMERICA 0.200 339,736.96 0.00
Subtotal 176,066.61 339,736.98 0.00 510,803.69
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
Subtotal 1,999,000.00
Total 12,038,976.45
Run Date. 04/092008 -17:21
1,999,000.00
339,736.98 1,000,000.00 11,378,712.43
Portfolio FIRE
CIS
PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept 6.41.202 ~
Reparl Ver. 5.00
P26
Pooled State of California
Money Investment Account
Market Valuation
2/29/2008
.- ` .~
Description "` Carrying Cost Plus ~
Accrued Interest Purch. :
: -
Fair,Value ,:;
'Accrued interest
United States Treasury:
Bills $ 1,340,973,555.57 $ 1,343,247,500.00 NA
Notes $ 1,812,293,186.24 $ 1,819,134,000.00 $ 15,459,480.00
Federal Agency:
SBA $ 560,667,174.20 $ 562,562,471.21 $ 4,746,504.13
MBS $ 1,180,504,583.18 $ 1,207,195.464.97 $ 5,599,833.76
Bonds $ 5,268,247,644.40 $ 5,317,058,854.25 $ 101,443,569.91
Floaters $ 4,886,507,872.65 $ 4,881,081,240.00 $ 17,905,147.62
Discount Notes $ 12,551,573,395.44 $ 12,758,115,900.00 NA
FHLMC PC $ 168,823.29 $ 174,989.69 $ 2,772.26
GNMA $ 176,058.66 $ 207,199.17 $ 1,746.38
CDs -Floaters $ 200,000,000.00 $ 200,000,000.00 $ 536,400.11
Bank Notes $ 925,000,000.00 $ 925,429,039.25 $ 4,192,645.84
CDs $ 10,985,063,997.96 $ 10,997,282,362.50 $ 66,450,801.39
Commercial Paper $ 3,872,999,547.18 $ 3,896,130,726.40 NA
Corporate:
Floaters $ 129,113,970.52 $ 125,459,057.00 $ 718,117.60
Bonds $ 216,155,655.63 $ 218,605,395.08 $ 2,500,544.70
Repurchase Agreements $ - NA
Reverse Repurchase $ - $ - $ -
Time Deposits $ 9,296,295,000.00 $ 9,296,295,000.00 NA
AB 55 & GF Loans $ 11,065,952,663.45 $ 11,065,952,663.45 NA
TOTAL $ 64,291,693,128.37 $ 64,613,931,862.97 $ 219,557,563.70
Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 64,833,489,426.67
Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and
Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost).
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265061 3/26/2008 3CMA 375.00
AP - 00265062 3/26/2008 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 247.41
AP - 00265063 3/26/2008 A&V SOFTBALL 2,622.00
AP - 00265064 3/26/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 126.67
AP - 00265064 3/26/2008 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 59.95
AP - 00265065 3/26/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 34.48
AP - 00265065 3/26/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 314.63
AP - 00265065 3/26/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 304.19
AP - 00265065 3/26/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 6.23
AP - 00265065 3/26/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 12.90
AP - 00265065 3/26/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 113.14
AP - 00265065 3/26/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 63.57
AP - 00265065 3/26/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 54.33
AP - 00265066 3/26/2008 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 119.87
AP - 00265067 3/26/2008 ABLETRONICS 38.79
AP - 00265069 3/26/2008 ABM JANITORIAL SW 49,] 62.11
AP - 00265069 3/26/2008 ABM JANITORIAL SW 855.71
AP - 00265070 3/26/2008 ACME BALLOON CO. 750.00
AP - 00265071 3/26/2008 ADVANCED AUTO TECH 376.52
AP - 00265071 3/26/2008 ADVANCED AUTO TECH 191.22
AP - 00265071 3/26/2008 ADVANCED AUTO TECH 1,028.23
AP - 00265072 3/26/2008 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3,437.91
AP - 00265073 3/26/2008 AFVI 699.00
AP - 00265075 3/26/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 263.45
AP - 00265075 3/26/2008 ALL CITIES TOOLS 156.59
AP - 00265076 3/26/2008 ALL WELDING 1,467.62
AP - 00265077 3/26/2008 ALPHAGRAPHICS 732.70
AP - 00265078 3/26/2008 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 29.78
AP - 00265079 3/26/2008 AMERICAN PIPE AND GEO-TEXTILES 199.34
AP - 00265080 3/26/2008 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 671.64
AP - 00265081 3/26/2008 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 219.58
AP - 00265081 3/26/2008 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 224.16
AP - 00265081 3/26/2008 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 192.65
AP - 00265082 3/26/2008 ANNUNZIATO, CHRISTINE 80.00
AP - 00265083 3/26/2008 APHRCK LLC 2,450.00
AP - 00265084 3/26/2008 APPA 22.50
AP - 00265086 3/26/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35
AP - 00265087 3/26/2008 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 673.44
AP - 00265088 3/26/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 95.05
AP - 00265088 3/26/2008 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 864.50
AP - 00265089 3/26/2008 ARTESIA SAWDUST PRODUCTS INC. 488.32
AP - 00265090 3/26/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 25,200.00
AP - 00265090 3/26/2008 AUFBAU CORPORATION 11,565.00
AP - 00265091 3/26/2008 AUTO BODY 2000 132.00
AP - 00265091 3/26/2008 AUTO BODY 2000 1,610.29
AP - 00265092 3/26/2008 AUTO SPECIALISTS 73.64
AP - 00265092 3/26/2008 AUTO SPECIALISTS 71.93
AP - 00265093 3/26/2008 AVANTS, MARGE 105.00
AP - 00265093 3/26/2008 AVANTS, MARGE 135.00
AP - 00265094 3/26/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 25.64
AP - 00265094 3/26/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 22.20
AP - 00265094 3/26/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 10.23
AP - 00265094 3/26/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 14.38
AP - 00265094 3/26/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 212.30
P27
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Reeister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265094 3/26/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 113.66
AP - 00265094 3/26/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 172.93
AP - 00265094 3/26/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 167.28
AP - 00265095 3/26/2008 BARKERS FOOD MACHINERY SERVICE 1,440.66
AP - 00265095 3/26/2008 BARKERS FOOD MACHINERY SERVICE 637.54
AP - 00265096 3/26/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE 289.93
AP - 00265096 3/26/2008 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,549.75
AP - 00265097 3/26/2008 BILL EMMERSON FOR ASSEMBLY 35.00
AP - 00265097 3/26/2008 BILL EMMERSON FOR ASSEMBLY 35.00
AP - 00265097 3/26/2008 BILL EMMERSON FOR ASSEMBLY 35.00
AP - 00265097 3/26/2008 BILL EMMERSON FOR ASSEMBLY 35.00
AP - 00265097 3/26/2008 BILL EMMERSON FOR ASSEMBLY 35.00
AP - 00265097 3/26/2008 BILL EMMERSON FOR ASSEMBLY 35.00
AP - 00265097 3/26/2008 BILL EMMERSON FOR ASSEMBLY 35.00
AP - 00265098 3/26/2008 BOXX, MARIE 1,314.00
AP - 00265099 3/26/2008 BRAUGHTON CONSTRUCTION INC. 158,345.41
AP - 00265099 3/26/2008 BRAUGHTON CONSTRUCTION INC. -18,834.54
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 220.58
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 55.76
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.14
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.84
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.84
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.29
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.04
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 530.50
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.52
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 80.94
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.79
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.29
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 515.63
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 384.84
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 32.04
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.84
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 32.10
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.88
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.46
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.88
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,199.56
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 185.98
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 186.12
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.78
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 132.80
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 297.12
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.46
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS S.S2
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 38.46
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 132.22
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.26
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
P28
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P29
Asenda Check Resister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 201.00
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 68.16
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.04
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.03
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,211.46
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 106.96
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 96.28
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 209.42
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 63.83
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.77
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.62
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.76
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.94
AP - 00265 ] 02 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.42
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.52
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.04
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.52
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 51.24
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.84
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.46
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.72
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.04
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 340.84
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 304.52
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 154.08
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 159.63
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 76.83
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.41
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 59.64
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 604.80
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 42.68
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 440.64
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.46
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.52
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.84
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.51
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.68
AP - 00265102 3/26/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.88
AP - 00265103 3/26/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 4,968.57
AP - 00265103 3/26/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 737.57
AP - 00265103 3/26/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 929.57
AP - 00265103 3/26/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 6,273.04
AP - 00265103 3/26/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 7,708.00
AP - 00265103 3/26/2008 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 9,622.54
AP - 00265104 3/26/2008 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 318.57
AP - 00265105 3/26/2008 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 140.00
AP - 00265106 3/26/2008 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL COP 360.00
AP - 00265107 3/26/2008 CALSENSE 3,304.67
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P30
Asenda Check Resister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265107 3/26/2008 CALSENSE 2,204.87
AP - 00265107 3/26/2008 CALSENSE 10,248.86
AP - 00265107 3/26/2008 CALSENSE 5,578.02
AP - 00265107 3/26/2008 CALSENSE 2,618.88
AP - 00265107 3/26/2008 CALSENSE 1,104.41
AP - 00265107 3/26/2008 CALSENSE 2,102.54
AP-00265107 3/26/2008 CALSENSE 1,897.68
AP - 00265107 3/26/2008 CALSENSE 2,488.99
AP - 00265107 3/26/2008 CALSENSE 2,263.10
AP - 00265107 3/26/2008 CALSENSE 1,104.41
AP - 00265108 3/26/2008 CAMPBELL, CHRISTINA 1,000.00
AP - 00265 ] 09 3/26/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 52.86
AP - 00265109 3/26/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 77.69
AP - 00265111 3/26/2008 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 10.57
AP - 00265111 3/26/2008 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 37.54
AP - 002651 ] 1 3/26/2008 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 6.05
AP - 0026511 I 3/26/2008 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 81.81
AP - 00265111 3/26/2008 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 9.49
AP - 00265112 3/26/2008 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 29.36
AP - 00265113 3/26/2008 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 32.99
AP - 00265 ] 14 3/26/2008 CHISM, TANDRA 500.00
AP - 00265115 3/26/2008 CITY RENTALS 210.20
AP - 00265116 3/26/2008 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP - 00265117 3/26/2008 CLARK, KAREN 252.00
AP - 00265118 3/26/2008 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 130.68
AP - 00265119 3/26/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 204.73
AP - 00265119 3/26/2008 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 1,131.38
AP - 00265120 3/26/2008 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 83.72
AP - 00265122 3/26/2008 COMPUTEK 17,869.55
AP - 00265123 3/26/2008 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 238.21
AP - 00265124 3/26/2008 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 16.39
AP - 00265125 3/26/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 67.20
AP - 00265125 3/26/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 201.60
AP - 00265125 3/26/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 10.50
AP - 00265125 3/26/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 6.00
AP - 00265125 3/26/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 4.00
AP - 00265125 3/26/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 57.60
AP - 00265125 3/26/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 3.00
AP - 00265125 3/26/2008 COOPER, CHERYL 115.20
AP - 00265126 3/26/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 1,293.84
AP - 00265126 3/26/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 58.80
AP - 00265126 3/26/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 217.19
AP - 00265126 3/26/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 54.80
AP - 00265126 3/26/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTNG INC. 54.80
AP - 00265126 3/26/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 54.79
AP - 00265126 3/26/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 162.00
AP - 00265126 3/26/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 53.99
AP - 00265126 3/26/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 54.00
AP - 00265127 3/26/2008 COUSIN, DAVID 550.00
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 377.00
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 226.71
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 317.15
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 136.27
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 295.87
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lope2 Page: 4 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 379.66
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.64
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 238.68
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 58.41
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 470.10
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 253.31
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 26.83
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 317.17
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 99.33
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 543.80
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 187.71
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.26
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 209.42
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 30.78
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 142.58
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32.15
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 56.09
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 213.41
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 103.64
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 334.31
AP -00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 263.95
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 132.28
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 255.97
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 294.11
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.28
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.30
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 229.37
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 403.60
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 190.80
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 144.98
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 621.72
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 623.05
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 161.54
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 305.18
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 21.51
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 212.98
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 12.20
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 316.92
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 34.81
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.56
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 72.25
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 35.01
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 273.26
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 91.95
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.60
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,177.98
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.85
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 56.29
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 646.99
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 334.44
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 318.48
AP - 00265 ] 29 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 271.93
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 68.99
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 450.42
P31
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: S Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 313.16
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,694.18
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 317.15
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 344.65
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 141.59
AP - 00265129 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 270.60
AP - 00265130 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,738.00
AP - 00265130 3/26/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,820.00
AP - 00265131 3/26/2008 CUEVAS, GUS 1;698.35
AP - 00265132 3/26/2008 CURIOSITY QUEST 72.00
AP - 00265133 3/26/2008 D 3 EQUIPMENT 2,521.35
AP - 00265134 3/26/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,324.44
AP - 00265134 3/26/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 603.40
AP - 00265134 3/26/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 280.69
AP - 00265134 3/26/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 749.41
AP - 00265135 3/26/2008 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 1,515.83
AP - 00265136 3/26/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 22,350.00
AP - 00265136 3/26/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 3,755.00
AP - 00265136 3/26/2008 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 11,555.00
AP - 00265137 3/26/2008 DAPPER TIRE CO 911.60
AP - 00265138 3/26/2008 DAVID SILVERMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 332.05
AP - 00265139 3/26/2008 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 2,730.00
AP - 00265139 3/26/2008 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 740.00
AP - 00265140 3/26/2008 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 150.00
AP - 00265141 3/26/2008 DEKRA-CITE INDUSTRIES INC 684.39
AP - 00265142 3/26/2008 DEL MECHANICAL 1,420.35
AP - 00265143 3/26/2008 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 64.00
AP - 00265144 3/26/2008 DGO AUTO DETAILING 65.00
AP - 00265145 3/26/2008 DIAZ YOURMAN AND ASSOCIATES 500.00
AP - 00265146 3/26/2008 DIETZ TOWING 300.00
AP - 00265147 3/26/2008 DMJM HARRIS 11,790.40
AP - 00265148 3/26/2008 DODSON & ASSOCIATES, TOM 280.50
AP - 00265149 3/26/2008 DOGS ETC. 253.50
AP - 00265150 3/26/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 13.96
AP - 00265150 3/26/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 123.82
AP - 00265150 3/26/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 11.50
AP - 00265150 3/26/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 59.00
AP - 00265150 3/26/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 9.31
AP - 00265150 3/26/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 70.93
AP - 00265151 3/26/2008 DUNN, ANN MARIE 108.00
AP - 00265151 3/26/2008 DUNN, ANN MARIE 126.00
AP - 00265152 3/26/2008 DURKEL, CAROL 113.12
AP - 00268182 3/26/2008 DURKEL, CAROL 73.72
AP - 00265153 3/26/2008 EASTERLING, RAY 300.00
AP - 00265154 3/26/2008 EBSCO 12,375.95
AP - 00265154 3/26/2008 EBSCO 8,813.98
AP - 00265154 3/26/2008 EBSCO 23.42
AP - 00265155 3/26/2008 EDWARDS, DUSTIN 48.00
AP - 00265157 3/26/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 530.00
AP - 00265157 3/26/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 150.00
AP - 00265157 3/26/2008 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 410.00
AP - 00265158 3/26/2008 ELLISON-SCHNEIDER & HARRIS L.L.P. 9,155.50
AP - 00265159 3/26/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 5,203.84
AP - 00265159 3/26/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 14,565.42
P32
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P33
Asenda Check Resister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265159 3/26/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 7,056.41
AP - 00265159 3/26/2008 EMCOR SERVICE 14,565.42
AP - 00265160 3/26/2008 ERIKSEN, ANNE 125.00
AP - 00265161 3/26/2008 ESGIL CORPORATION 11,224.07
AP - 00265162 3/26/2008 ESMOND, GARY 48.00
AP - 00265163 3/26/2008 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 67.50
AP - 00265163 3/26/2008 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 209.84
AP - 00265164 3/26/2008 SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 589.87
AP - 00265164 3/26/2008 SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 599.79
AP - 00265164 3/26/2008 SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 729.06
AP - 00265164 3/26/2008 SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 555.02
AP - 00265164 3/26/2008 SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 467.35
AP - 00265164 3/26/2008 SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 174.27
AP - 00265165 3/26/2008 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 44.61
AP - 00265166 3/26/2008 FARLEY, COLLEEN 1,314.00
AP - 00265167 3/26/2008 FASTENAL COMPANY 7.94
AP - 00265167 3/26/2008 FASTENAL COMPANY 25.17
AP - 00265167 3/26/2008 FASTENAL COMPANY 25.65
AP - 00265167 3/26/2008 FASTENAL COMPANY 24.55
AP - 00265167 3/26/2008 FASTENAL COMPANY 11.68
AP - 00265167 3/26/2008 FASTENAL COMPANY 1.89
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.29
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.56
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 27.24
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.56
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.56
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.56
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.02
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 25.81
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 22.14
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.56
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.56
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 21.53
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 28.93
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.56
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.29
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 23.56
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 23.56
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.56
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.29
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.26
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 41.36
AP - 00265168 3/26/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.26
AP - 00265169 3/26/2008 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 511.50
AP - 00265171 3/26/2008 FONTANA/RANCHO NJB 250.00
AP - 00265171 3/26/2008 FONTANA/RANCHO NJB 43.50
AP - 00265172 3/26/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 137.94
AP - 00265173 3/26/2008 FOX TRANSPORTATION INC. 500.00
AP - 00265174 3/26/2008 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 57.86
AP - 00265175 3/26/2008 GADABOUT TOURS INC 2,518.20
AP - 00265176 3/26/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 30. t 3
AP - 00265176 3/26/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 27.44
AP - 00265176 3/26/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 56.02
AP - 00265176 3/26/2008 GALE GROUP,THE 125.96
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P34
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265178 3/26/2008 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 300.00
AP - 00265179 3/26/2008 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 286.62
AP - 00265180 3/26/2008 GOLF VENTURES WEST 71.35
AP - 00265181 3/26/2008 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,000.00
AP - 00265182 3/26/2008 GORKA, CHRISTINA 560.10
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 42.43
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 97.81
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 80.13
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 46.49
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 277.50
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 86.58
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 267.41
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 785.55
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 81.53
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 13.92
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 28.32
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 49.65
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 38.17
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 4.50
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 72.99
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 128.27
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 549.53
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 6.76
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 33.71
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 56.19
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 16.59
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 84.96
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 14.59
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 44.11
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 122.67
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 20.14
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 106.06
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRADQGER 74.78
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 14.96
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 46.49
AP - 00265183 3/26/2008 GRAINGER 106.46
AP - 00265184 3/26/2008 GRANDARA, EDWARD 250.00
AP - 00265185 3/26/2008 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 127.36
AP - 00265186 3/26/2008 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 192.75
AP - 00265186 3/26/2008 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 290.92
AP - 00265186 3/26/2008 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 1,929.23
AP - 00265187 3/26/2008 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 200.00
AP - 00265188 3/26/2008 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 512.40
AP - 00265189 3/26/2008 HARPER, JORDAN 445.21
AP - 00265190 3/26/2008 HAVEN AUTO REPAIR 700.16
AP - 00265191 3/26/2008 HAY, SHARYN 349.50
AP - 00265192 3/26/2008 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 115.80
AP - 00265192 3/26/2008 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 142.96
AP - 00265193 3/26/2008 HERNANDEZ, PAOLA 250.00
AP - 00265195 3/26/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 165.94
AP - 00265195 3/26/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 100.00
AP - 00265195 3/26/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00
AP - 00265195 3/26/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00
AP - 00265195 3/26/2008 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Dale: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265196 3/26/2008 HOLLINGSHEAD, DANA 145.00
AP - 00265197 3/26/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 7.79
AP - 00265197 3/26/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 37.39
AP - 00265197 3/26/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES ] 0.92
AP - 00265197 3/26/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 158.54
AP - 00265197 3/26/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 304.87
AP - 00265197 3/26/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 40.37
AP - 00265197 3/26/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 85.27
AP - 00265197 3/26/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 23.02
AP - 00265197 3/26/2008 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 32.20
AP - 00265198 3/26/2008 HOSE MAN INC 93.23
AP - 00265198 3/26/2008 HOSE MAN INC 16.98
AP - 00265199 3/26/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 16.47
AP - 00265199 3/26/2008 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 244.38
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 362.70
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 27.36
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 255.67
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 11.17
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 160.66
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 16.90
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 398.70
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC -104.35
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 575.45
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 193.12
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 144.59
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 150.05
AP - 00265200 3/26/2008 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 92.78
AP - 00265201 3/26/2008 IBM CORPORATION 356.72
AP - 00265202 3/26/2008 IE SALES & MARKETING COUNCIL 500.00
AP - 00265203 3/26/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 55.83
AP - 00265203 3/26/2008 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 478.16
AP - 00265204 3/26/2008 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 25.00
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 48.00
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 48.00
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.00
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 268.08
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 87.60
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 191.48
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 48.00
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.00
AP - 00265205 3/26/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 48.00
AP - 00265206 3/26/2008 INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS PUBLICATIONS LLC 117.00
AP - 00265207 3/26/2008 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF 120.00
AP - 00265208 3/26/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 96.16
AP - 00265208 3/26/2008 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 748.09
AP - 00265209 3/26/2008 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 1,327.16
AP - 00265210 3/26/2008 J D C INC 159,250.31
AP - 00265211 3/26/2008 JACKSON HIRSH INC 89.78
AP - 00265212 3/26/2008 JAMES, KATHY 24.24
AP - 00265213 3/26/2008 JOHNSON, TEAIRRE 250.00
AP - 00265214 3/26/2008 JONES, ROBERT 3,276.00
AP - 00265215 3/26/2008 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 235.97
P35
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 04/09/200
Repor[: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265216 3/26/2008 KELLUM, TAMARA 250.00
AP - 00265217 3/26/2008 KELLY EQUIPMENT 27.82
AP - 00265219 3/26/2008 KUZMINSKI, CHERISE G6.16
AP - 00265220 3/26/2008 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 15,500.00
AP - 00265220 3/26/2008 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 6,750.00
AP - 00265221 3/26/2008 LAND FORMS LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION INi 222,650.10
AP - 00265221 3/26/2008 LAND FORMS LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION IN~ -22,265.01
AP - 00265223 3/26/2008 LEXINGTON TECHNOLOGY INC 267.60
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 450.00
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 300.00
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 350.00
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 385.00
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 325.00
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 283.33
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 283.34
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 283.33
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 125.00
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 210.00
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 125.00
AP - 00265225 3/26/2008 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 350.00
AP - 00265226 3/26/2008 LOPEZ, KRISMA BASTIEN 250.00
AP - 00265227 3/26/2008 LOS ANGELES DODGERS 1,130.00
AP - 00265228 3/26/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 321.10
AP - 00265228 3/26/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 107.75
AP - 00265228 3/26/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 970.61
AP - 00265228 3/26/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 350.46
AP - 00265228 3/26/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 1,119.11
AP - 00265228 3/26/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 345.07
AP - 00265228 3/26/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 43.10
AP - 00265228 3/26/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 134.69
AP - 00265228 3/26/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 218.19
AP - 00265228 3/26/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 129.30
AP - 00265228 3/26/2008 MAIN STREET SIGNS 1,236.97
AP - 00265229 3/26/2008 MANELA, ROSE 58.20
AP - 00265229 3/26/2008 MANELA, ROSE 47.47
AP - 00265230 3/26/2008 MANSOURI, IRAJ 3,960.00
AP - 00265231 3/26/2008 MANTEK 447.59
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 34.78
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 956.26
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 32.1 I
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 32,997.80
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,432.07
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 463.96
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 308.34
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 113.12
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 128.41
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 365.24
AP - 00265232 3/26/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,767.32
AP - 00265233 3/26/2008 MARTIN, GAYLE 500.00
AP - 00265234 3/26/2008 MARTINO, MITCH 100.00
AP - 00265236 3/26/2008 MAZOR, MARYA 1,333.00
AP - 00265237 3/26/2008 MCCLINTOCK, RONDALYNNE 75.00
AP - 00265238 3/26/2008 MCI 3,166.28
AP - 00265238 3/26/2008 MCI 3,153.06
P36
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: ]0 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P37
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265238 3/26/2008 MCI 3,153.06
AP - 00265239 3/26/2008 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 121.82
AP - 00265240 3/26/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 227.34
AP - 00265240 3/26/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 177.38
AP - 00265240 3/26/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 169.92
AP - 00265240 3/26/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 142.94
AP - 00265240 3/26/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 153.88
AP - 00265240 3/26/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 129.91
AP - 00265240 3/26/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 305.78
AP - 00265240 3/26/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 259.86
AP - 00265240 3/26/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 164.91
AP - 00265240 3/26/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 177.88
AP - 00265240 3/26/2008 MIDWEST TAPE 177.88
AP - 00265241 3/26/2008 MI]AC ALARM COMPANY 320.00
AP - 00265242 3/26/2008 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA R 490.00
AP - 00265243 3/26/2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 72.73
AP - 00265244 3/26/2008 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 175.00
AP - 00265245 3/26/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 267.46
AP - 00265245 3/26/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS -13.10
AP - 00265245 3/26/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS -56.02
AP - 00265245 3/26/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 43.50
AP - 00265245 3/26/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 19.65
AP - 00265245 3/26/2008 NAPA AUTO PARTS 287.07
AP - 00265246 3/26/2008 NATIONAL ASSOC OF TOWN WATCH 25.00
AP - 00265247 3/26/2008 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 500.00
AP - 00265249 3/26/2008 NELSON AND SIXTA 450.00
AP - 00265250 3/26/2008 NICP 45.00
AP - 00265251 3/26/2008 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 152.00
AP - 00265252 3/26/2008 NINYO & MOORE 2,366.75
AP - 00265252 3/26/2008 NINYO & MOORE 2,905.75
AP - 00265253 3/26/2008 NUMARA SOFTWARE INC 1,980.00
AP - 00265254 3/26/2008 NUNEZ, CLAUDIA 394.48
AP - 00265255 3/26/2008 OCASSE-PDC 30.00
AP - 00265256 3/26/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 1,136.00
AP - 00265256 3/26/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 375.00
AP - 00265256 3/26/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 70.00
AP - 00265256 3/26/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 68.62
AP - 00265256 3/26/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 134.79
AP - 00265256 3/26/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 103.86
AP - 00265256 3/26/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 253.4]
AP - 00265256 3/26/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 133.54
AP - 00265256 3/26/2008 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 68.62
AP - 00265257 3/26/2008 OCLC INC 45.79
AP - 00265259. 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1.70
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 26.25
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 179.11
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 48.44
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 30.16
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 92.79
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 223.47
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 3.65
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 3.35
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 1.72
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 3.35
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p3$
Agenda Check Resister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 8.34
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 42.65
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 172.05
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 80.95
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT ] 62.30
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 87.50
AP - 00265259 3/26!2008 OFFICE DEPOT 65.43
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 30.46
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 87.83
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 58.62
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 135.29
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 86.86
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 61.12
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 45.26
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 150.30
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 83.66
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 29.29
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 110.21
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 537.81
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 58.51
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 228.06
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 26.15
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 64.64
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 95.09
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 78.54
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 4.21
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 106.65
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 29.16
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 304.85
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 46.24
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 76.85
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 45.70
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 23.26
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 81.14
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 208.44
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 56.15
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 33.60
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 40.02
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 154.14
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 31.72
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 430.99
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 19.65
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 79.41
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 30.08
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 23.93
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFF]CE DEPOT -33.60
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 27.48
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 85.53
AP - 00265259 3/26/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 24.23
AP - 00265261 3/26/2008 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 118.50
AP - 00265262 3/26/2008 ONTARIO, CITY OF 161.27
AP - 00265263 3/26/2008 OPEN APPS 540.00
AP - 00265263 3/26/2008 OPEN APPS 1,000.00
AP - 00265263 3/26/2008 OPEN APPS 991.30
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[
AP - 00265264 3/26/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 12.90
AP - 00265264 3/26/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9.42
AP - 00265264 3/26/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 0.74
AP - 00265264 3/26/2008 ORCHARD SliPPLY HARDWARE 4.61
AP - 00265264 3/26/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 3.74
AP - 00265264 3/26/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2.14
AP - 00265264 3/26/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.38
AP - 00265264 3/26/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -0.46
AP - 00265265 3/26/2008 OTT, LAURA 564.00
AP - 00265265 3/26/2008 OTT, LAURA 152.75
AP - 00265265 3/26/2008 OTT, LAURA 228.00
AP - 00265265 3/26/2008 OTT, LAURA 72.00
AP - 00265266 3/26/2008 OTT, SHARON 144.00
AP - 00265266 3/26/2008 OTT, SHARON 204.00
AP - 00265267 3/26/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 86.70
AP - 00265267 3/26/2008 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 120.68
AP - 00265268 3/26/2008 PARK, HAE J 665.00
AP - 00265269 3/26/2008 PATTON SALES CORP 33.73
AP - 00265269 3/26/2008 PATTON SALES CORP 6.23
AP - 00265269 3/26/2008 PATTON SALES CORP 406.54
AP - 00265269 3/26/2008 PATTON SALES CORP 4.65
AP - 00265269 3/26/2008 PATTON SALES CORP 130.16
AP - 00265270 3/26/2008 PEREZ, HECTOR 40.00
AP - 00265271 3/26/2008 PERSKE, BRIAN 150.00
AP - 00265272 3/26/2008 PETERMAN LUMBER INC 142.91
AP - 00265273 3/26/2008 PIEPHO, RICHARD 349.50
AP - 00265274 3/26/2008 PILOT POWER GROUP INC 9,340.95
AP - 00265275 3/26/2008 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 2,459.90
AP - 00265276 3/26/2008 POSTER SOLUTIONS 82.00
AP - 00265276 3/26/2008 POSTER SOLUTIONS 20.31
AP - 00265277 3/26/2008 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 76.82
AP - 00265278 3/26/2008 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 22.80
AP - 00265279 3/26/2008 PRINCIPAL LIFE 2,130.95
AP - 00265280 3/26/2008 PROJECT SISTER 150.00
AP - 00265281 3/26/2008 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 60.25
AP - 00265282 3/26/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 200.00
AP - 00265283 3/26/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES PROFESSIONP 17,500.00
AP - 00265284 3/26/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 27.42
AP - 00265284 3/26/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 98.97
AP - 00265284 3/26/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 90.35
AP - 00265284 3/26/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 279.67
AP - 00265284 3/26/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 73.11
AP - 00265284 3/26/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 279.67
AP - 00265284 3/26/2008 RANDOM HOUSE INC 33.24
AP - 00265285 3/26/2008 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 250.81
AP - 00265286 3/26/2008 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 25.00
AP - 00265286 3/26/2008 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 14.55
AP - 00265287 3/26/2008 RCPFA 7,350.02
AP - 00265288 3/26/2008 RDO EQUIPMENT CO 591.55
AP - 00265288 3/26/2008 RDO EQUIPMENT CO 111. ] 8
AP - 00265288 3/26/2008 RDO EQUIPMENT CO 103.16
AP - 00265289 3/26/2008 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 8.57
AP - 00265289 3/26/2008 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 29.96
AP - 00265290 3/26/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 194.27
P39
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265290 3/26/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 5722
AP - 00265290 3/26/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 70.15
AP - 00265290 3/26/2008 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 58.51
AP - 00265291 3/26/2008 REPUBLIC ITS 5,150.53
AP - 00265291 3/26/2008 REPUBLIC ITS 6,788.88
AP - 00265291 3/26/2008 REPUBLIC ITS 21,834.72
AP - 00265293 3/26/2008 REXEL CALCON 36.30
AP - 00265293 3/26/2008 REXEL CALCON 0.15
AP - 00265294 3/26/2008 RGA ENVIRONMENTAL INC 3,700.00
AP - 00265294 3/26/2008 RGA ENVIRONMENTAL INC 440.00
AP - 00265294 3/26/2008 RGA ENVIRONMENTAL INC 3,700.00
AP - 00265296 3/26/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 155.50
AP - 00265296 3/26/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 97.50
AP - 00265296 3/26/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 65.00
AP - 00265296 3/26/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 147.50
AP - 00265296 3/26/2008 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 65.00
AP - 00265297 3/26/2008 ROBLES, RAMON 24.00
AP - 00265298 3/26/2008 ROSEN PUBLISHING AND POWERKIDS 1,061.88
AP - 00265299 3/26/2008 RUBIO, RONDA 150.00
AP - 00265300 3/26/2008 SAEIDI, ARDY 80.00
AP - 00265302 3/26/2008 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 338.55
AP - 00265303 3/26/2008 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 2,178.16
AP - 00265303 3/26/2008 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 124.78
AP - 00265303 3/26/2008 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 1,080.14
AP - 00265304 3/26/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 47,291.25
AP - 00265306 3/26/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,109,469.00
AP - 00265306 3/26/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 200.00
AP - 00265306 3/26/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 21,817.00
AP - 00265307 3/26/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 186.83
AP - 00265308 3/26/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 284.86
AP - 00265309 3/26/2008 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 600.00
AP - 00265310 3/26/2008 SAN DIEGO MARRIOTT MISSION VALLEY 678.50
AP - 00265311 3/26/2008 SANTOS, MANNY 88.00
AP - 00265312 3/26/2008 SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLISHING 300.63
AP - 00265312 3/26/2008 SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLISHING 51.83
AP - 00265312 3/26/2008 SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLISHING 1,891.02
AP - 00265313 3/26/2008 SCRIPPS CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE HEALTH 2,284.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 93.60
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 126.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 99.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 79.20
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 132.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 44.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 150.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 50.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 123.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 41.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 96.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 32.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 27.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 9.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 3.00
AP - 00265314 3/26/2008 SENECHAL, CALVIN 1.00
AP - 00265315 3/26/2008 SHOR-LINE 672.35
P40
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265316 3/26/2008 SIGMANET 230.00
AP - 00265317 3/26/2008 SILVER, EDNA 480.00
AP - 00265317 3/26/2008 SILVER, EDNA 480.00
AP - 00265318 3/26/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 685.29
AP - 00265318 3/26/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 527.58
AP - 002653 ] 8 3/26/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,000.00
AP - 00265318 3/26/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,000.00
AP - 00265318 3/26/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,000.00
AP - 00265318 3/26/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,000.00
AP - 00265318 3/26/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,000.00
AP - 00265319 3/26/2008 SKINNER, GARY AND PATRICIA 32,482.28
AP - 00265321 3/26/2008 SMART TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 779.00
AP - 00265322 3/26/2008 SMITH, MICHAEL C 1,472.00
AP - 00265324 3/26/2008 SOIL AND PLANT LABORATORY INC 641.56
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.47
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 713.08
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.80
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.60
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.40
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.05
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.53
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 5.14
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.92
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.48
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.16
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.54
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.89
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.58
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.81
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.34
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.81
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.60
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.84
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.04
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.94
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.40
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 268.06
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.92
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.75
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.62
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.23
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
P41
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p42
Aeenda Check Re>?ister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.81
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.34
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.14
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.46
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.19
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.22
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFOINIA EDISON 59.32
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,802.19
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.37
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.84
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 218.73
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.89
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.43
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.00
AP - 00265326 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.00
AP - 00265328 3/26/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RISK MANAGEMENT. 8,746.25
AP - 00265329 3/26/2008 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 276.00
AP - 00265330 3/26/2008 STANFIELD, AMANDA 225.00
AP - 00265331 3/26/2008 SUMMIT TRAINING SOURCE INC 1,600.00
AP - 00265332 3/26/2008 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 323.25
AP - 00265333 3/26/2008 SYKES, ZANETA 550.00
AP - 00265334 3/26/2008 TAMBUNAN, HERTATY 500.00
AP - 00265335 3/26/2008 TECH DEPOT 714.23
AP - 00265336 3/26/2008 TETRA TECH INC 400.00
AP - 00265337 3/26/2008 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 3,522.36
AP - 00265339 3/26/2008 TOMARK SPORTS INC 122.74
AP - 00265340 3/26/2008 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 157.50
AP - 00265341 3/26/2008 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 520.58
AP - 00265341 3/26/2008 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 420.77
AP - 00265341 3/26/2008 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 933.22
AP - 00265341 3/26/2008 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 653.36
AP - 00265342 3/26/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 147.31
AP - 00265342 3/26/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 54.17
AP - 00265342 3/26/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 32.15
AP - 00265342 3/26/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 54.17
AP - 00265342 3/26/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 32.15
AP - 00265342 3/26/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 127.18
AP - 00265342 3/26/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 864.OS
AP - 00265342 3/26/2008 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 962.72
AP - 00265343 3/26/2008 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 425.07
AP - 00265344 3/26/2008 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION AND WELF~ 375.53
AP - 00265345 3/26/2008 UNITED WAY 16.00
AP - 00265346 3/26/2008 UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC 600.00
AP - 00265347 3/26/2008 UPS 33.60
AP - 00265348 3/26/2008 US POSTMASTER 1,500.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Asenda Check Resister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265349 3/26/2008 VASQUEZ, LESLIE 108.00
AP - 00265349 3/26/2008 VASQUEZ, LESLIE 132.00
AP - 00265350 3/26/2008 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 138.88
AP-00265351 3/26/2008 VELOCITAWIRELESS 1,018.]6
AP - 00265351 3/26/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 169.76
AP - 00265351 3/26/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 185.12
AP - 00265351 3/26/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 385.60
AP-00265351 3/26/2008 VELOCITAWIRELESS 61.64
AP - 00265351 3/26/2008 VELOCITA WIRELESS 30.92
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 86.88
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 48.17
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 643.34
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 68.42
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 163.66
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 50.39
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 88.57
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 88.57
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 93.67
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 44.95
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 35.41
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 73.54
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 81.75
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 34.56
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 34.21
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 88.57
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 34.21
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 88.57
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 88.57
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 88.57
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 88.57
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 161.08
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 103.74
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 34.12
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 4].40
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 37.00
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 77.48
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 34.56
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 112.17
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 88.82
AP - 00265353 3/26/2008 VERIZON 464.36
AP - 00265354 3/26/2008 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LLC 624.53
AP - 00265354 3/26/2008 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LLC 37.10
AP - 00265355 3/26/2008 VINEYARD WEST MINI STORAGE 85.31
AP - 00265356 3/26/2008 VINEYARD WEST OFFICE PARK 93.32
AP - 00265357 3/26/2008 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,705.92
AP - 00265358 3/26/2008 VISTA PAINT 43.55
AP - 00265358 3/26/2008 VISTA PAINT 625.98
AP - 00265358 3/26/2008 VISTA PAINT 192.70
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 282.78
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 18.21
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 82.58
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 22.51
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 20.27
P43
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P44
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 798.01
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 43.10
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 44.55
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 43.85
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 36.26
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 14.73
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 84.23
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 169.72
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 69.32
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 310.49
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 90.51
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 106.21
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 57.46
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 298.62
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 298.52
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 37.12
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 115.27
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 369.80
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 107.64
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 23.26
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 30.63
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 43.97
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 66.75
AP - 00265359 3/26/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,605.65
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 353.79
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 88.36
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,275.72
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 816.63
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 69.39
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 106.69
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 80.00
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 64.00
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 426.26
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 113.61
AP - 00265360 3/26/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,002.42
AP - 00265361 3/26/2008 WEIR, JEWELL 585.00
AP - 00265363 3/26/2008 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 7.06
AP - 00265364 3/26/2008 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 320.85
AP - 00265364 3/26/2008 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 1,020.75
AP - 00265365 3/26/2008 WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC 370.10
AP - 00265366 3/26/2008 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 1,654.50
AP - 00265366 3/26/2008 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 31.83
AP - 00265367 3/26/2008 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 791.96
AP - 00265367 3/26/2008 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 172.40
AP - 00265368 3/26/2008 WILKINSON, SHARONDA 70.70
AP - 00265369 3/26/2008 WILSON AND BELL 1,067.39
AP - 00265369 3/26/2008 WILSON AND BELL 539.59
AP - 00265371 3/26/2008 WORKMAN PUBLISHING CO 15.27
AP - 00265372 3/26/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 330.46
AP - 00265372 3/26/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 5,255.43
AP - 00265372 3/26/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 6,539.19
AP - 00265372 3/26/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 1,998.72
AP - 00265372 3/26/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 7,797.39
AP - 00265372 3/26/2008 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 9,608.40
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Re>?ister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265373 3/26/2008 YEE, LARRY 27.00
AP - 00265374 3/26/2008 YORK INDUSTRIES 775.80
AP - 00265374 3/26/2008 YORK INDUSTRIES 7] 1.15
AP - 00265375 3/26/2008 ZIRGES, ARLENE 180.00
AP - 00265375 3/26/2008 ZIRGES, ARLENE 180.00
AP - 00265375 3/26/2008 ZIRGES, ARLENE 264.00
AP - 00265376 3/26/2008 ROB LAKE MAGIC INC 9,000.00
AP - 00265377 3/26/2008 SIEGEL ARTIST MANAGEMENT 3,000.00
AP - 00265378 3/27/2008 PARK, HAE J 665.00
AP - 00265379 3/27/2008 PRICE AND FUTURE MARINE, DONAVAN 550.00
AP - 00265380 3/27/2008 DUFFY, RICK 3,870.30
AP - 00265381 3/31/2008 DHILLON AND ALL MAGIC PAINT & BODY, HA] 1,989.85
AP - 00265382 4/2/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 47.41
AP - 00265382 4/2/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 90.51
AP - 00265382 4/2/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 45.26
AP - 00265382 4/2/2008 ABC LOCKSMITHS 45.26
AP - 00265383 4/2/2008 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 71.77
AP - 00265383 4/2/2008 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 133.45
AP - 00265383 4/2/2008 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 74.68
AP - 00265383 4/2/2008 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 95.50
AP - 00265383 4/2/2008 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 584.74
AP - 00265384 4/2/2008 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 15,446.54
AP - 00265384 4/2/2008 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 14,541.54
AP - 00265385 4/2/2008 ALPHAGRAPHICS 398.24
AP - 00265386 4/2/2008 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 12783
AP - 00265387 4/2/2008 AMERICAN ABRASIVE & TOOL INC. 75.12
AP - 00265388 4/2/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A< 395.00
AP - 00265388 4/2/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 119.75
AP - 00265388 4/2/2008 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 42.00
AP - 00265390 4/2/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35
AP - 00265390 4/2/2008 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 10.38
AP - 00265391 4/2/2008 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 445.00
AP - 00265391 4/2/2008 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 89.00
AP - 00265391 4/2/2008 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 159.91
AP - 00265393 4/2/2008 AT AND T 90.67
AP - 00265394 4/2/2008 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 1,165.35
AP - 00265395 4/2/2008 ATRT 54.44
AP - 00265395 4/2/2008 AT&T 54.44
AP - 00265395 4/2/2008 AT&T 18.10
AP - 00265395 4/2/2008 AT&T 18.29
AP - 00265397 4/2/2008 AUTO BODY 2000 1,623.73
AP - 00265398 4/2/2008 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 128.01
AP - 00265400 4/2/2008 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 1,435.79
AP - 00265401 4/2/2008 BARAJAS, HERMINL4 500.00
AP - 00265403 4/2/2008 BEACON PLUMBING 258.75
AP - 00265403 4/2/2008 BEACON PLUMBING 1,029.07
AP - 00265404 4/2/2008 BEARINGS & DRIVES INC. 311.40
AP - 00265405 4/2/2008 BEN BOLLINGER PRODUCTIONS LTD. 500.00
AP - 00265406 4/2/2008 BERTGES, RUTH 254.52
AP - 00265408 4/2/2008 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA 145,945.31
AP - 00265409 4/2/2008 BONILLA, JOE 250.00
AP - 00265409 4/2/2008 BONILLA, JOE 500.00
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 126.05
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.59
P45
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P46
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 65.27
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 87.05
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.61
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.54
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 50.75
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.62
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 170.07
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4,984.14
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.44
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.78
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 179.68
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 460.68
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 300.97
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.41
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 58.51
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 139.76
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 194.90
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 64.51
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 71.12
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 53.73
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 60.08
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.20
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 76.77
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 35.82
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 627.63
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 415.99
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.57
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 114.35
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.45
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.74
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.08
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.54
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 92.45
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.43
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 37.65
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 983.07
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 567.31
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.44
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.25
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 65.71
AP-002654]7 4/2/2008 BRODARTBOOKS 1,152.08
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 38.42
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 86.99
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.43
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.10
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 281.13
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 240.43
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 121.12
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 42.58
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.57
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,348.64
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 112.27
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 165.00
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.40
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 04/09/200
ReporkCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p47
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.04
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.04
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 464.01
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.40
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 20.55
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.01
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 43.85
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 2,904.49
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 69.37
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 112.28
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 154.48
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.98
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.86
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 49.37
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 52.29
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.18
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 58.11
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 105.35
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.97
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 46.46
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 162.89
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 86.16
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 629.03
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,361.61
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.98
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 33.85
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 142.44
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 45.49
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 395.53
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 144.87
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 117.02
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 85.15
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.89
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 71.63
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 235.27
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 31.62
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 126.33
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 20.91
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.22
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 107.64
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 187.86
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 26.34
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 36.66
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 59.36
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.98
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 403.78
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,137.08
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS ]37.54
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 647.27
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4,781.83
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 535.45
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 109.94
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 2,481.72
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p48
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 184.05
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.74
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 242.18
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 3.81
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 5.78
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 798.22
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1,038.42
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12,029.33
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 3,614.69
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4,454.70
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 2,780.41
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 3833
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 171.90
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 459.30
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 60.52
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.70
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 157.49
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 394.32
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 230.83
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.61
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.50
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 31.01
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 62.05
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.25
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 47.43
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 121.31
AP - 002654]7 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.35
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 32.53
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 275.63
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 170.53
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 173.44
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 41.65
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 17.67
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 5.07
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.53
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 78.74
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 9.53
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.57
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.41
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.17
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 51.69
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.14
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.49
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.01
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.57
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 724.46
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 68.84
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.19
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 194.95
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 51.21
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 60.49
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.21
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 8.52
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 38.66
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pottrai[ Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P49
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 9.51
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.69
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.41
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 183.73
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 330.17
~AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 31.12
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 28.02
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 72.60
AP - 002654]7 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 6.42
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 4.26
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 76.64
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 136.24
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 124.18
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.29
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.71
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 196.01
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 69.55
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 28.02
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.89
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 40.95
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 170.80
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.13
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.53
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 1839
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 12.33
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 10.62
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.30
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.85
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 57.45
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.58
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 28.89
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.16
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 45.11
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.21
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 28.62
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.53
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 84.41
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 9.51
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 150.88
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 22.26
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 11.59
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 16.44
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 178.08
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 28.23
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.97
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.96
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 21.30
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 19.38
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13.97
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 25.21
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 111.32
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 53.22
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 45.20
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 35.20
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 04/09/200
Repor[:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P50
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 195.77
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 54.88
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 74.54
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.23
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 28.23
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 23.98
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 96.99
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 33.64
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.96
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.25
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 80.44
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.10
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 31.99
AP - 002654 ] 7 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.19
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 42.21
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 15.66
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 27.10
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 13. ] 5
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 26.83
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 24.44
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 54.05
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 29.10
AP - 002654]7 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 14.53
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 43.64
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 92.98
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 45.13
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 41.69
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 84.74
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 7.63
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 65.48
AP - 00265417 4/2/2008 BRODART BOOKS 97.06
AP - 002654]8 4/2/2008 BUSINESS AND LEGAL REPORTS INC 299.54
AP - 00265419 4/2/2008 CACEO 65.00
AP - 00265419 4/2/2008 CACEO 65.00
AP - 00265420 4/2/2008 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 66.75
AP - 00265421 4/2/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 47.58
AP - 00265422 4/2/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 274.36
AP - 00265423 4/2/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00
AP - 00265424 4/2/2008 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 372.03
AP - 00265425 4/2/2008 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC 58.75
AP - 00265425 4/2/2008 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC. 58.75
AP - 00265425 4/2/2008 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC. 58.75
AP - 00265425 4/2/2008 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC. 58.75
AP - 00265426 4/2/2008 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 9,122.62
AP - 00265427 4!2/2008 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL COF 370.00
AP - 00265428 4/2/2008 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 183.75
AP - 00265429 4/2/2008 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 685.00
AP - 00265430 4/2/2008 CALSENSE 1,562.38
AP - 00265431 4/2/2008 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 37.02
AP - 00265432 4!2/2008 CAMPOS DECORATION & RENTALS 1,000.00
AP - 00265433 4/2/2008 CAPITOL ENQUIRY 189.78
AP - 00265434 4/2/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 491.29
AP - 00265434 4/2/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 276.14
AP - 00265434 4/2/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 614.58
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265434 4/2/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 38.03
AP - 00265434 4/2/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 162.28
AP - 00265434 4/2/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 242.21
AP - 00265434 4/2/2008 CAR CARE 3c TRANSMISSION PRO 52.86
AP - 00265434 4/2/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 38.03
AP - 00265434 4/2/2008 CAR CARE & TRANSMISSION PRO 52.86
AP - 00265436 4/2/2008 CITY RENTALS SS.00
AP - 00265438 4/2/2008 CLARK, KAREN 72.00
AP - 00265439 4/2/2008 CLARKS PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 26.29
AP - 00265439 4/2/2008 CLARKS PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 269.38
AP - 00265439 4/2/2008 CLARKS PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 41.96
AP - 00265441 4/2/2008 CONSENSUS PLANNING GROUP 250.00
AP - 00265442 4/2/2008 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 192.88
AP - 00265444 4/2/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 202.00
AP - 00265444 4/2/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 52.00
AP - 00265444 4/2/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 58.80
AP - 00265444 4/2/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 211.99
AP - 00265444 4/2/2008 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 52.80
AP - 00265446 4/2/2008 CREATNE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 2,470.00
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 283.90
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 726.76
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 726.76
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.19
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 92.20
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.00
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 395.62
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.71
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.88
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 71.65
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 346.28
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 354.66
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.28
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 177.50
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 222.72
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 278.58
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 621.72
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 169.52
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 198.78
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 773.05
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,834.07
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT SS.20
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 56.29
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 87.61
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 178.74
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.88
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.57
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.66
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ]41.39
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 102.59
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 177.50
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 35.01
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 133.61
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 49.64
P51
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 83.97
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.31
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 178.83
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 259.96
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 154.89
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 438.18
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 645.55
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.66
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 290.12
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.99
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 164.20
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 102.84
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 182.82
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 273.26
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.26
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 45.65
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 29.49
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 91.95
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.62
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 169.52
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 281.64
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 254.21
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.00
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.24
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 425.20
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,020.74
AP - 00265448 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,289.70
AP - 00265449 4/2/2008 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,993.41
AP - 00265450 4/2/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 374.44
AP - 00265450 4/2/2008 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 280.69
AP - 00265451 4/2/2008 DAADOUCH, KASIBA 45.00
AP - 00265452 4/2/2008 DAPPER TIRE CO 3,370.90
AP - 00265453 4/2/2008 DATA QUICK 129.50
AP - 00265453 4/2/2008 DATA QUICK 131.44
AP - 00265454 4/2/2008 DEALERS AUTO TRIM 275.00
AP - 00265455 4/2/2008 DELGADILLO, ELISA 500.00
AP - 00265456 4/2/2008 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 133.20
AP - 00265457 4/2/2008 DKLD WINGS INC. 200.00
AP - 00265458 4/2/2008 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 171.74
AP - 00265459 4/2/2008 E POLY STAR INC. 1,659.35
AP - 00265460 4/2/2008 E.D.D. RIVERSIDE AREA COLLECTION OFFICE 36.99
AP - 00265461 4/2/2008 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 19.40
AP - 00265461 4/2/2008 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 615.26
AP - 00265462 4/2/2008 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 513.97
AP - 00265463 4/2/2008 EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING 1,665.00
AP - 00265464 4/2/2008 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 2,089.13
AP - 00265464 4/2/2008 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 203.88
AP - 00265464 4/2/2008 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 375.00
AP - 00265465 4/2/2008 ESHANZADA, ZIA 250.00
AP - 00265466 4/2/2008 FBC FAIRWAY VILLAGE 7,400.00
AP - 00265467 4/2/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.29
AP - 00265467 4/2/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 17.30
AP - 00265467 4/2/2008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.02
AP - 00265469 4/2/2008 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00
P52
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P53
Agenda Check ReEister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265470 4/2/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC -110.72
AP - 00265470 4/2/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC -18.10
AP - 00265470 4/2/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 295.77
AP - 00265470 4/2/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1 ] 0.72
AP - 00265470 4/2/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 48.27
AP - 00265470 4/2/2008 FORD OF UPLAND INC 672.34
AP - 00265472 4/2/2008 GAMEZ, MARK 425.00
AP-00265473 4/2/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 2]8.19
AP - 00265473 4/2/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 1,230.26
AP - 00265473 4/2/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 4,011.12
AP - 00265473 4/2/2008 GEOGRAPHICS 548.18
AP - 00265475 4/2/2008 GOMEZ, CYNTHIA 400.00
AP - 00265476 4/2/2008 GRAINGER 118.22
AP - 00265476 4/2/2008 GRAINGER 386.93
AP - 00265476 4/2/2008 GRAINGER 634.72
AP - 00265476 4/2/2008 GRAINGER 149.10
AP - 00265476 4/2/2008 GRAINGER 85.11
AP - 00265476 4/2/2008 GRAINGER 101.39
AP - 00265476 4/2/2008 GRAINGER 118.42
AP - 00265476 4/2/2008 GRAINGER -55.76
AP - 00265476 4/2/2008 GRAINGER 303.86
AP - 00265476 4/2/2008 GRAINGER 249.44
AP - 00265478 4/2/2008 GUARDIAN 3,378.80
AP - 00265479 4/2/2008 H & H GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC 417,140.45
AP - 00265479 4/2/2008 H & H GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC -41,7]4.04
AP - 00265480 4/2/2008 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 584.90
AP - 00265483 4/2/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 188.56
AP - 00265483 4/2/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 190.75
AP - 00265483 4/2/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 29.55
AP - 00265483 4/2/2008 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 23.85
AP - 00265484 4/2/2008 HOUGHTON, JENNIFER 40.00
AP - 00265485 4/2/2008 HOUSE OF RUTH 483.62
AP - 00265488 4/2/2008 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 794.55
AP - 00265488 4/2/2008 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 1,004.41
AP - 00265489 4/2/2008 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 108.03
AP - 00265490 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY AOR 250.00
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 341.25
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 212.50
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 3 ] 1.25
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 378.75
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 727.50
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 727.50
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 135.00
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 111.25
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 468.75
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 201.25
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 590.00
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 453.75
AP - 00265491 4/2/2008 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 722.50
AP - 00265492 4/2/2008 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 85.00
AP - 00265492 4/2/2008 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 85.00
AP - 00265495 4/2/2008 ISLAMIC CENTER OF INLAND EMPIRE 500.00
AP - 00265496 4/2/2008 ITE 84.00
AP - 00265497 4/2/2008 JASPER. JAN 72.50
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P54
Agenda Check Re>?ister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265498 4/2/2008 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 108,328.63
AP - 00265498 4/2/2008 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 923.85
AP - 00265498 4/2/2008 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC -3,695.40
AP - 00265498 4/2/2008 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 1NC 7,390.88
AP - 00265499 4/2/2008 KAUFMAN, HOPE 150.00
AP - 00265500 4/2/2008 KELLY, JOSEPH 375.00
AP - 00265502 4/2/2008 KONE INC 457.74
AP - 00265503 4/2/2008 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 6,459.99
AP - 00265504 4/2/2008 LAMOUREAUX, DAVID 375.00
AP - 00265505 4/2/2008 LEE, HEE 80.00
AP - 00265506 4/2/2008 LEYVA, LUCY 85.00
AP - 00265507 4/2/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 98.04
AP - 00265507 4/2/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 92.85
AP - 00265507 4/2/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 81.00
AP - 00265507 4/2/2008 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19.50
AP - 00265510 4/2!2008 LINA 17,399.77
AP - 00265511 4/2/2008 LINTHICUM, JAMES 22.22
AP - 00265511 4/2/2008 LINTHICUM, JAMES 37.37
AP - 00265511 4/2/2008 LINTHICUM, JAMES 10.00
AP - 00265513 4/2/2008 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 902.39
AP - 00265514 4/2/2008 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF 250.00
AP - 00265517 4/2/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 130.02
AP - 00265517 4/2/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 64.20
AP - 00265517 4/2/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 642.62
AP - 00265517 4/2/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 305.87
AP - 00265517 4/2/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 724.74
AP - 00265517 4/2/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,707.10
AP - 00265517 4/2/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,116.62
AP - 00265517 4/2/2008 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 66.79
AP - 00265518 4/2/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING 734.99
AP - 00265518 4/2/2008 MARSHALL PLUMBING -183.75
AP - 00265519 4/2/2008 MAYER, ALYSON 32.00
AP - 00265520 4/2/2008 MAZOR, MARYA 1,334.00
AP - 00265521 4/2/2008 MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES 112,649.82
AP - 00265521 4/2/2008 MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES -11,264.98
AP - 00265522 4/2/2008 MEGAZONE INC 379.00
AP - 00265523 4/2/2008 MICHAEL ASNER CONSULTING 500.00
AP - 00265524 4/2/2008 MILLENNIUM INSURANCE SERVICES 100.00
AP - 00265525 4/2/2008 MOOSE POINT TECH 2,241.69
AP - 00265526 4/2/2008 MORTON, SHAWN 20.00
AP - 00265527 4/2/2008 MOYER, JARROD 100.00
AP - 00265528 4/2/2008 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 20.00
AP - 00265529 4/2/2008 MUNSON, MICHELLE 70.17
AP - 00265530 4/2/2008 MURADIAN, LESLIE 500.00
AP - 00265531 4/2/2008 MYCO INVESTMENTS INC 1,880.00
AP - 00265534 4/2/2008 NATURES EARTH PRODUCTS INC 1,256.37
AP - 00265535 4/2/2008 NBS 1,500.00
AP - 00265535 4/2/2008 NBS 1,000.00
AP - 00265535 4/2/2008 NBS 1,000.00
AP - 00265536 4/2/2008 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 18,471.62
AP - 00265538 4/2/2008 NEXTEL 76.08
AP - 00265538 4/2/2008 NEXTEL 75.76
AP - 00265539 4/2/2008 NIELSEN, NETTIE 10.00
AP - 00265539 4/2/2008 NIELSEN, NETTIE 52.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 28 Current Date: 04/09/200
ReportCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265540 4/2/2008 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 72.00
AP - 00265541 4/2/2008 NINYO & MOORE 16,065.25
AP - 00265543 4/2/2008 NOWAK, JOHN 158.71
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 12.21
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 60.82
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 157.82
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 331.31
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 21.43
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 92.69
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 406.84
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 2,523.89
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 285.54
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 40.38
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 23.63
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 215.28
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 4.40
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 31.04
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 90.40
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT -11.23
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 371.67
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 16.03
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 196.90
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 113.83
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 45.99
AP - 00265544 4/2/2008 OFFICE DEPOT 16.55
AP - 00265545 4/2/2008 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 4,255.48
AP - 00265546 4/2/2008 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 1,215.34
AP - 00265546 4/2/2008 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC. 1,799.64
AP - 00265548 4/2/2008 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2,252.86
AP - 00265549 4/2/2008 OTSUKA, DENNIS 100.00
AP - 00265550 4/2/2008 PAL CAMPAIGN 82.00
AP - 00265551 4/2/2008 PALEI, MOSAATI 500.00
AP - 00265552 4/2/2008 PALLOTTO, KRISTINA 60.60
AP - 00265553 4/2/2008 PARISH, DAVID 26.00
AP - 00265554 4/2/2008 PATERSON, DAVID ROSS 90.00
AP - 00265555 4/2/2008 PHILLIPS, KENNETH A 3,500.00
AP - 00265556 4/2/2008 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 536.03
AP - 00265557 4/2/2008 PRONG, BRYAN 250.00
AP - 00265558 4/2/2008 PRONG, LORRAINE 400.00
AP - 00265559 4/2/2008 PIRANHA POOL & SPA CONSTRUCTORS INC 150.00
AP - 00265560 4/2/2008 PITNEY BOWES 414.00
AP - 00265561 4/2/2008 POMIERSKI, ROSELYN 55.00
AP - 00265562 4/2/2008 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 41,489.79
AP - 00265563 4/2/2008 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 266.49
AP - 00265564 4/2/2008 PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS PUBLICATIONS SPEC: 1,080.00
AP - 00265567 4/2/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,250.00
AP - 00265567 4/2/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00
AP - 00265567 4/2/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,250.00
AP - 00265567 4/2/2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00
AP - 00265569 4/2/2008 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 96.98
AP - 00265570 4/2/2008 RED WING SHOE STORE 200.00
AP - 00265572 4/2/2008 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS 1,205.94
AP - 00265573 4/2/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 350.60
AP - 00265573 4/2/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 474.00
P55
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 29 Current Dale: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P56
Aeenda Check Re¢ister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 0026SS73 4/2/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 8,095.20
AP - 00265573 4/2/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,432.00
AP - 00265573 4/2/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AATD GERSHON 3,861.00
AP - 00265573 4/2/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,105.50
AP - 00265573 4/2/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 31.60
AP - 00265573 4/2/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,722.80
AP - 00265573 4/2/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 44.00
AP - 00265573 4/2/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 105.00
AP - 00265573 4/2/2008 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,336.50
AP - 00265574 4/2/2008 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 508.26
AP - 00265574 4/2/2008 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 2,927.88
AP - 00265574 4/2/2008 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 161.40
AP - 00265574 4/2/2008 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 1,861.72
AP - 00265574 4/2/2008 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 1,695.60
AP - 00265574 4/2/2008 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 1,716.66
AP - 00265575 4/2/2008 RISING STARS 950.00
AP - 00265576 4/2/2008 RIVAS, MARISA 75.00
AP - 00265577 4/2/2008 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 1,792.50
AP - 00265577 4/2/2008 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 71,873.52
AP - 00265578 4/2/2008 RMA GROUP 2,127.75
AP - 00265578 4/2/2008 RMA GROUP 4,369.75
AP - 00265578 4/2/2008 RMA GROUP 1,925.00
AP - 00265578 4/2/2008 RMA GROUP 63.00
AP - 00265579 4/2/2008 ROSAS, ROSA 500.00
AP - 00265580 4/2/2008 RUBIO, RONDA 425.00
AP - 0026558] 4/2/2008 RUIZ, MARTHA 162.00
AP - 00265582 4/2/2008 SAFETY CENTER INC 825.00
AP - 00265583 4/2/2008 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 119.44
AP - 00265584 4/2/2008 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY D A OFFICE 500.00
AP - 00265585 4/2/2008 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 21.31
AP - 00265586 4/2/2008 SAN BERNARDINO CTY ASSESSOR 840.00
AP - 00265589 4/2/2008 SANTOS, MANNY 96.00
AP - 00265590 4/2/2008 SC FUELS -2,925.41
AP - 0026SS91 4/2/2008 SCMAF -INLAND VALLEYS 1,650.00
AP - 00265592 4/2/2008 SCMAF INLAND VALLEYS 380.00
AP - 00265593 4/2/2008 SCOTT, DIANA 375.00
AP - 00265594 4/2/2008 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 250.00
AP - 00265595 4/2/2008 SIGMANET 1,385.99
AP - 0026SS96 4/2/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 3,910.79
AP - 00265596 4/2/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,907.18
AP - 0026SS96 4/2/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,243.25
AP - 00265596 4/2/2008 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,429.49
AP - 00265597 4/2/2008 SIPHOMSAY, SID 29.62
AP - 0026SS99 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4,907.51
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 464.86
AP - 0026SS99 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 257.55
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 273.52
AP - 0026SS99 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 352.08
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4,996.98
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,272.97
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,246.04
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 566.67
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 279.73
AP - 00265599 4/2/2008 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5,803.45
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 30 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P57
Agenda Check Resister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265600 4/2/2008 SOURCE GRAPHICS 180.11
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.89
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,645.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.05
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.81
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.81
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.05
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.92
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1536
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.40
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.57
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.82
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.21
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.04
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.44
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.64
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.92
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.32
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.70
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.24
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.29
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.96
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.96
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.05
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.05
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.04
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.81
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.10
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.48
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.81
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.09
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.61
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.57
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.95
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.81
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.97
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.68
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.50
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.43
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.19
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 31 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p5g
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.67
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.43
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.65
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.72
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.21
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.18
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.99
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.42
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 403.70
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.15
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.48
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.10
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.67
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.19
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.02
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.66
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.13
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.88
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.83
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.75
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.57
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.63
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.59
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.04
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.73
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.05
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 23.85
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.58
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.81
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.19
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.67
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.69
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.76
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.85
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.87
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.12
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.12
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.40
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.44
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.04
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.] 8
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.81
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 32 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.87
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 461.17
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.OS
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.06
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 144.92
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.18
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.51
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.53
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.86
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.65
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.54
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 17.05
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 55.98
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 735.86
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 108.81
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.66
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.11
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.98
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.56
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.17
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.12
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 167.60
AP - 00265607 4!2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.21
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 322.88
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 274.17
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.1 S
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.34
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 397.39
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.95
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.00
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.59
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.97
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.27
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.27
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.12
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.73
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.81
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.93
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 181.01
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.74
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.42
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
P59
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 33 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Reffister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.35
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.25
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.14
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.65
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.81
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.04
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.22
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.97
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.67
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.47
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.32
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.82
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.30
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.25
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.25
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.72
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.63
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.75
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.19
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.72
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.42
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 157.95
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.66
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.04
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.85
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.91
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.88
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 797.63
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.5]
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 144.31
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.05
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.02
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.56
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
P60
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 34 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p67
Agenda Check Res?ister
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.76
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1598
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.67
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.45
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.41
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.46
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.58
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.27
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.04
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.66
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.42
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 435.67
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.03
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.90
AP - 00265607 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.36
AP - 00265608 4/2/2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EQUIPMENT 524.20
AP - 00265610 4/2/2008 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 966.00
AP - 0026561 I 4/2/2008 SPAGNOLO, SAM 186.55
AP - 00265612 4/2/2008 SPOONFACTORY 330.00
AP - 00265613 4/2/2008 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 3,000.00
AP - 00265613 4/2/2008 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33
AP - 00265613 4/2/2008 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 344.39
AP - 00265614 4/2/2008 STEENKAMP, JOHN 175.00
AP - 00265615 4/2/2008 STEWART DVM, DONNA 550.00
AP - 00265615 4/2/2008 STEWART DVM, DONNA 550.00
AP - 00265615 4/2/2008 STEWART DVM, DONNA 550.00
AP - 00265615 4/2/2008 STEWART DVM, DONNA 550.00
AP-002656]5 4/2/2008 STEWART DVM, DONNA 550.00
AP - 00265616 4/2/2008 STITCHWEAR INC 160.60
AP - 00265617 4/2/2008 STOFA, JOSEPH 13.00
AP - 00265618 4/2/2008 SUNBELT RENTALS INC 53.05
AP - 00265619 4/2/2008 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 129.30
AP - 00265620 4/2/2008 T MOBILE 511.68
AP - 00265621 4/2/2008 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C 2,529.77
AP - 00265623 4/2/2008 THEATRE FOR YOUNG AUDIENCES USA 300.00
AP - 00265624 4/2/2008 TIME WARNER TELECOM 3,460.20
AP - 00265625 4/2/2008 TOMARK SPORTS INC 431.00
AP - 00265626 4/2/2008 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES INC 395.98
AP - 00265627 4/2/2008 TRENCH SHORING COMPANY 3,303.08
AP - 00265628 4/2/2008 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 606.54
AP - 00265628 4/2/2008 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 656.22
AP - 00265629 4/2/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 48,664.23
AP - 00265630 4/2/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 252.40
AP - 00265630 4/2/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 2,902.49
AP - 00265631 4/2/2008 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 11,264.98
AP - 00265632 4/2/2008 UNITED WAY 304.82
AP - 00265633 4/2/2008 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC 389.43
AP - 00265634 4/2/2008 VALLEY CREST NURSERY 1,099.05
AP - 00265635 4/2/2008 VASAMSETTY, SARADA 114.00
AP - 00265636 4/2/2008 VERIZON BUSINESS 3,153.06
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 35 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P62
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 87.88
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 43.64
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 570.79
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 35.51
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 128.10
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 205.48
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 35.41
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 20.10
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 88.82
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 33.64
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 33.49
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 33.59
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 61.53
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 35.41
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 35.51
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 33.49
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 34.30
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 33.49
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 19.53
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 490.48
AP - 00265639 4/2/2008 VERIZON 34.56
AP - 00265640 4/2/2008 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LLC 692.40
AP - 00265640 4/2/2008 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LLC 1,153.89
AP - 00265640 4/2/2008 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LLC 109.91
AP - 00265641 4/2/2008 VISTA PAINT 7.92
AP - 00265643 4/2/2008 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 37.23
AP - 00265644 4/2/2008 WATKINS, BRIAN 90.00
AP - 00265645 4/2/2008 WATSON PAINTING CORPORATION 29,214.00
AP - 00265646 4/2/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 159.08
AP - 00265646 4/2/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 427.94
AP - 00265646 4/2/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 584.01
AP - 00265646 4/2/2008 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 217.25
AP - 00265647 4/2/2008 WELLS FARGO BANK N A 2,000.00
AP - 00265647 4/2/2008 WELLS FARGO BANK N A 2,000.00
AP - 00265648 4/2/2008 WENDY'S INTERNATIONAL 295.15
AP - 00265649 4/2/2008 WEST COAST LIGHTS & SIRENS 212.33
AP - 00265650 4/2/2008 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 216.50
AP - 00265651 4/2/2008 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 169.12
AP - 00265652 4/2/2008 WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC 852.96
AP - 00265652 4/2/2008 WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC -597.73
AP - 00265653 4/2/2008 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 20,690.00
AP - 00265654 4/2/2008 WILLIAMS, BARB ERA 250.00
AP - 00265655 4/2/2008 WOODWARD, LAURA 250.00
AP - 00265656 4/2/2008 XLNT TINT OF ANAHEIM INC 132.81
AP - 00265657 4/2/2008 YEE, LARRY 64.00
AP - 00265658 4/2/2008 ZALEWSKI, JOHN 750.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lope2 Page: 36 Current Date: 04/09/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P63
Agenda Check Register
3/26/2008 through 4/8/2008
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00265658 4/2/2008 ZALEWSKI, JOHN 500.00
AP - 00265659 4/2/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 175.80
AP - 00265659 4/2/2008 ZEE MEDICAL INC 183.50
AP - 00265660 4/2/2008 ZiJNIGA, CRYSTAL 500.00
Total for Check ID AP: 4,886,637.76
Total for Entity: 4,886,637.76
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 37 Current Date: 04/09/200
ReporCCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:02:5
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Par Market Book % of Days [o YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value PoMollo Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equly.
Local Agency Investment FUnd 30,722,141.15 30,722,141.15 30,722,141.15 16.26 1 1 3.725 3.777
CalTrust Shon-Term Fund (JPA) 15,038,332.50 15,038,332.50 15,038,332.50 7.96 1 1 2.811 2.850
Certifcates of Deposit/Neg. -Bank 8,000,000.00 8,021,996.00 8,000,000.00 4.24 169 86 4.200 4.258
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 113,925,000.00 115,532,264.13 173,852,265.00 60.27 1,490 1,071 4.248 4.307
Treasury SecunOes-Coupon 5,000,000.00 5,145,312.50 5,002,343.75 2.65 661 333 4.654 4.719
Investment Agreements 16,277,362.71 16,277,362.71 16,277,362.71 8.62 1 1 3.632 3.682
188,962,836.36 190,737,408.99 188,892,445.11 100.00% 923 659 4.004 4.060
Investments
Cash and Accrued Interest
Passbook/Checking 911,541.39 911,541.39 911,541.39 1 1 0.197 0.200
(not included in yield calculations)
Accrued Interest at Purchase 6,394.45 6,394.45
SUbtOlal 917,935.84 917,935.84
Total Cash and Investments 189,874,377.75 191,655,344.83 189,810,380.95 923 659 4.004 4.060
Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 672,930.83 6,320,585.05
Average Daily Balance 191,731,889.19 193,608,925.80
Effective Rate of Return 4.13°/ 4.33
I certify that this report accurately refl ects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted Dece mber 19, 2007. A copy of the investment policy is availab le in the
Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein show n provides sufficient cash Oow liquidity to meet the next six months esti mated expenditures. The month-end market values
were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service.
The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City o~cial Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents
govern the management of these funds. On October 21, 2004 the City entered into a Investment Agreement with AegonlTransamerice in the amount of $15,600,000. The Investment Agreement will
earn interest at 6.00% per annum through June 28, 2006 to provide funding for specific expenditures during that period. Beginning June 29, 2006 through October 21, 2009, the Investment Agreement
will earn interest t 2.41 % verage annual rate of return over the fve year period is 3.682%which is incorporated in the annual rate of return noted above.
Q
^~ /QQprC Q~1J0$
James . Frc t, Tr as
Reporting period 0 310112 0 0 8-0 313112 0 0 8
Run Date: 04/092008 - 1 Yt]
PoMolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) 6ymRept 6.41.202b
Report Ver. 5.00
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
March 31, 2008
Page 2
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Marke[ Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date
Local Agency Investment Fund
SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 30,722,141.15 30,722,141.15 30,722,141.15 3.777 3.725 1
Subtotal and Average 33,770,528.25 30,722,141.15 30,722,141.15 30,722,141.15 3.725 1
CalTrust Short-Term Fund (JPA)
SYS1331 1331 CALTRUST SHORT-TERM FUND 02/26/2008 15,038,332.50 15,038,332.50 15,038,332.50 2.850 2.811 1
SuMolal and Average 13,552,311.91 75,038,332.50 75,076,332.50 15,038,332.50 2.817 7
Certificates of DeposiVNeg. -Bank
90531CDE9 1325 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 01/09/2008 8,000,000.00 8,021,996.00 8,000,000.00 4.200 4.200 88 06/26/2008
Subtotal and Average 9,774,193.55 8,000,000.00 8,021,996.00 8,000,000.00 4.200 86
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
313310M79 1205
31331XA36 1309
31331YDH0 1316
3133XJVL9 1294
3133XKUH8 1308
3133XL304 1310
3133XLAH6 1372
3133XLBS1 1313
3133XMS77 1314
3133XMZTi 1317
3133XQAG7 1338
3133XOGC0 1339
3128X1808 1198
3128X1700 1208
3128XO7G8 1258
3128XSR75 1298
3128XSR75 1302
3128XSK80 1306
3128X60R0 1318
3128X6RV0 1319
3128X7CU6 1340
3136F32F2 1222
3136FBLU7 1304
31398ABC5 1307
Run Date: Od/09I2006 - 17:17
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 2,000,000.00 2,002,500.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 63 06/03/2008
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/25/2007 4,000,000.00 4,271,250.00 4,000,000.00 5.050 4.981 1,149 05/25/2011
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/13/2007 2,500,000.00 2,533,593.75 2,499,375.00 4.650 4.594 1,137 05/13/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/13/2007 5,000,000.00 5,318,750.00 5,000,000.00 5.000 4.929 1,074 03/11/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/24/2007 4,000,000.00 4,070,000.00 3,984,000.00 5.150 5.190 1,148 05/24/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/29/2007 4,000,000.00 4,147,500.00 4,000,000.00 5.350 5.277 1,519 05/29/2012
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/18/2007 3,000,000.00 3,022,500.00 3,000,000.00 5.600 5.523 1,539 06/18/2012
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/2007 3,000,000.00 3,022,500.00 3,000,000.00 5.500 5.425 815 06/25/2010
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/01/2007 2,500,000.00 2,539,843.75 2,500,000.00 4.870 4.803 1,311 11/03/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/13/2007 1,570,000.00 1,591,587.50 1,570,000.00 4.690 4.626 1,137 05/13/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/12/2008 5,000,000.00 5,046,875.00 5,000,000.00 3.350 3.305 1,350 12/12/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/24/2008 5,000,000.00 5,031,250.00 5,000,000.00 3.250 3.208 1,361 12/23/2011
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 5,007 039.64 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 48 05/19/2008
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 5,000,000.00 5,005,785.37 4,998,500.00 3.030 2.995 71 06/11/2008
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/12/2004 1,250,000.00 1,251,502.42 1,248,750.00 3.650 3.626 36 05/07/2008
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/20/2007 - 2,000,000.00 2,023,505.86 1,996,600.00 5.250 5.217 1,444 03/15/2012
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/04/2007 3,000,000.00 3,035,258.79 2,993,400.00 5.250 5.228 1,444 03/15/2012
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/10/2007 5,000,000.00 5,068,795.01 5,000,000.00 5.400 5.324 1,431 03/02/2012
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 11/19/2007 2,500,000.00 2,536,677.55 2,500,000.00 4.500 4.438 597 11/19/2009
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 12/03/2007 2,500,000.00 2,530,967.33 2,500,000.00 4.320 4.281 975 12/02/2010
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/26/2008 5,000,000.00 5,026,394.66 5,000,000.00 3.250 3.205 1,455 03/26/2012
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/29/2003 4,000,000.00 4,010,000.00 3,993,750.00 3.300 3.289 119 07/29/2008
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,014,062.50 4,996,250.00 5.250 5.199 1,133 05/09/2011
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/21/2007 3,000,000.00 3,057,187.50 2,991,000.00 5.300 5.296 1,497 05/07/2012
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.41.202b
(.Tl
Reppn Ver. 5.00
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
March 31, 2008
Page 3
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maludry
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
31398ADF6 1311 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/12/2007 4,000,000.00 4,027,500.00 3,995,800.00 5.600 5.548 1,633 06/12/2012
31398AJK9 1315 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 11/05/2007 3,000,000.00 3,041,250.00 3,000,000.00 4.750 4.685 848 11/05/2010
31398AKV3 1320 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/28/2007 2,000,000.00 2,025,625.00 2,000,000.00 4.400 4.340 995 12/22/2010
31398ANC2 1333 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/11/2008 5,000,000.00 5,025,000.00 4,993,000.00 3.125 3.131 1,046 02/11/2011
3136F82D6 1334 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/13/2008 2,105,000.00 2,131,312.50 2,100,790.00 3.625 3.629 1,413 02/13/2012
3136F84J1 1335 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/14/2008 3,000,000.00 3,027,187.50 3,000,000.00 3.625 3.575 1,414 02/14/2012
31398ANH7 1336 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/07/2008 5,000,000.00 5,031,250.00 4,997,500.00 3.250 3.223 1,060 02/25/2011
3136F9BY8 1337 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/12/2008 5,000,000.00 5,057,812.50 5,000,000.00 3.550 3.501 1,441 03/12/2012
Subtotal and Aversge 710,852,748.87 113,925,000.00 115,532,264.13 117,852,265.00 4.248 1,071
Federal Agency Issues -Discount
Subtotal and Average 2,092,062.90
Treasury Securities -Coupon
912828GJ3 1305 TREASURY NOTE 05/09/2007 5,000,000.00 5,145,312.50 5,002,343.75 4.750 4.654 333 02/28/2009
Subtotal antl Average 5,002,347.75 5,000,000.00 5,145,312.50 5,002,343.75 4.654 733
Investment Agreements
SYS1275 1275 AEGON /TRANSAMERICA 16,277,362.71 16,277,362.71 16,277,362.71 3.682 3.832 i
Subtotal and Average 16,245,914.24 16,277,362.71 16,277,362.71 16,277,362.71 3.632 1
Total and Average 191,731,889.19 188,962,836.36 190,737,408.99 188,692,445.11 4.004 659
Run Date: 04/092006 - 17:17
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF PM2) SymRept 6.41.202b -O
!~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page4
Portfolio Details -Cash
March 37, 2008
Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days to
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 760 Maturity
SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts
SY500180 00160 BANK OF AMERICA 911,541.39 911,541.39 911,541.39 0.200 0.197 1
Average Balance 0.00 AaNetl Interest al Purchase 6,394.45 6,394.45 1
Subtotal 917,935.84 917,935.84
Total Cash antl Investmenfss 191,731,889.19
Run Date: 04IW/2006 -17:17
189,874,377.75 191,655,344.63 189,610,380.95
4.004 659
PoMolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM213ymRepl6 d1.2025 ~
V
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
March 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008
Page 5
Beginning Statetl _ Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investmen[M Issuer Balance Rale Date or Deposits or Wlmtlrawals Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary)
SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 3.777 12,500,000.00 14,000,000.00-
Subtotal 32,222,141.15 12,500,000.00 14,000,000.00 30,722,141.15
CalTrust Short-Tenn Fund (JPA)
SYS1331 1331 CALTRUST SHORT-TERM FUND 2.850 5,035,554.61 0.00
Subtotal 10,002,777.89 5,035,554.61 0.00 15,038,332.50
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. -Bank
90531CFF4 1332 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 3.000 03/12/2008 0.00 S,000,OOO.OP~
Subtotal 1J,000,000.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 8,000,000.00
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
31331TWH0 1253
31331X705 1297
3133XQAG7 1338
3133XQGC0 1339
3128X2P25 1257
3128X7CU6 1340
3136FBFW0 1301
31398ANH1 1336
3136F9BY8 1337
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN
Subtotal 103,854,765.00
3.240 03/17/2008 0 00 2,000,000.00
5.250 03/28/2008 0.00 5,000,000.00
3.350 03/12/2008 5,000,000.00' 0.00
3.250 03/24/2006 5,000,000.00 0.00
4.000 03/31/2008 0.00 3,000,000.00
3.250 03/26/2008 5,000,000.00 0.00
5.430 03/07/2008 0.00 5,000,000.00
3.250 03/07/2008 4,997,500.00 0.00
3.550 03/12/2008 5,000,000.00 0.00
24,997,500.00 15,000,000.00
113,852,265.00
Federal Agency Issues -Discount
3133847X7 1329 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.670 03/05/2008 0.00 4,989,987.50
313588UC7 1330 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 2.650 03/10/2008 0.00 4,988,222.22
SubtOWl 9,978,209.72 0.00 9,978,209.72 0.00
Treasury Securities -Coupon
Subtotal 5,002,343.75
5,002,343.75
Investment Agreements (Monthly Summary)
SYS1275 1275 AEGON /TRANSAMERICA 3.682
Suhtotal 16,244,865.96
Run Oeie. 0410912008- i].1]
32,496.75
32,496.75
0.00
0.00 16,277,362.71
Portfolio CITY
CIS
PM (PRF_PM3) SymRep16.41.20: ~
Report Ver. 5.00
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Activity By Type
March 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008
Page 6
Beglnning Stated Transaction Purchases Retlemptions Entling
CUSIP Inves[ment# Issuer Balance Ra[e Date or Deposits or Wlthtlrawals Balance
SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary)
SYS00180 00180 BANK Of AMERICA 0.200 485,414.19 0.00
Subtotal 426,127.20
485,414.19
0.00 911,541.39
Total 190,711,230.67 43,050,965.65 43,978,209.72 189,803,986.50
Portfolio CITY
C ~
Ron Data'. 04I09I2609- 11:1] PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept 6.41.20: ~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended February 29, 2008
Bond Issue
Assessment District No 93-1
Masi Plaza
Trustee and/or
Pavino Aoent Account Name
Wells Fargo Imprvmnt Fund
Reserve Fund
Redemp. Fund
Investment
Money Market Fund
Money Market Fund
Money Market Fund
Purchase Maturity Cost
Date Date Yield Value
8/4/1997 N/A' 2.15% $ 287,652.97
8/4/1997 N/A 2.15% 242,959.04
8/4/1997 N/A' 2.15% 71,656.81
$ 602,266.82
PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series Wells Fargo Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A`
1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A`
Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A`
Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A'
Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A'
Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A'
CFD No 2000-03 Rancho Summit
CFD No 2000-Ot South Etiwanda
Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo
Special Tax Fund
Reserve Fund
Escrow Fund
Project Fund
Cost of Issuance Fund
Interest Account
Principal Account
Special Tax Fund
Reserve Fund
Admin Expense Fund
Acquisition Fund
Interest Account
Principal Account
0.00% $
2.15% 590,300.68
2.15% 1,108,951.33
2.15% 39,433.97
0.00% -
2.15% 556,544.51
$ 2,295,230.49
Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 0.00% $ 6.96
Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 2.15% 711,538.26
Money Markel Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 0.00% -
Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 2.15% 6,571,512.31
Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 2.15% 142,568.18
Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 2.15% 236,075.63
Money Market Fund 1 0/1 312 00 5 N/A 2.27% 44.09
$ 7,661,745.43
Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 2.15% $ 283.18
Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 NIA 2.15% 111,630.68
Money Market Fund 12112/2000 N/A 1.60% 62.44
Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 2.74% 90,709.82
Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 2.15% 35,296.68
Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 0.00% 0.00
$ 237,982.80
V
O
Trustee andlor Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue Paving Agent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value
CFD No 2000-02 RC Corporate Park Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A
Reserve Fund Money Markel Fund 12/12/2000 N/A
Admin Expense Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A
Acquisition Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A
Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A
Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A
CFD No 2003-01 Improvement Areas #1 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Agency Project Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Cultural Center Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Interest Account Money Markel Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Principal Account Money Markel Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
CFD No 2003-01 Improvement Areas #2 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Agency Project Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A
CFD No 2001-01 Improvement Areas #1 & #2 Wells Fargo
2.17% $ 1,728.74
2.15% 681,606.42
1.60% 62.44
2.74% 573,526.13
2.15% 190,455.06
1.75% 57.39
$ 1,447,436.18
2.16% $ 3,673.36
2.15% 1,467,269.23
2.15% 511,093.28
2.15% 426,437.63
2.15% 512,115.76
2.15% 465,175.05
0.00% 8.82
$ 3,385,773.13
0.00% $
2.15% 290,309.62
2.15% 89,018.07
0.00% 0.18
0.00% 2.21
$ 379,330.08
2.14% $ 2,726.35
2.15% 1,084,030.24
2.15% 5,042.47
2.15% 3,867.30
2.15% 411,699.40
2.15% 61,956.95
1.82% 110.36
2.15% 2,163,015.65
$ 3,732,448.72
V
Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund
Reserve Fund Money Market Fund
Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund
Agency Project Fund Money Market Fund
Interest Account Money Market Fund
Admin Exp. Fund Money Market Fund
Principal Account Money Market Fund
Redemption Fund Money Market Fund
9/18/2001
9/18/2001
9/18/2001
9/18/2001
9/1 B/2001
9/18/2001
8/31 /2006
9/18/2001
N/A
N/A
1/4/1900
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bond Issue
CFD No 2001-01 Improvement Areas #3
CFD No 2004-01 Rancho Etiwanda Estates
CFD No 2006-01 Vintner's Grove
CFD No 2006-02 Amador on Route 66
Trustee andlor
Paving Agent Account Name Investment
Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund
Reserve Fund Money Market Fund
Developer Project Fund Money Market Fund
Admin Exp. Fund Money Marke[ Fund
Interest Account Money Market Fund
Principal Account Money Market Fund
Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS
Special Tax Fund
Reserve Fund
Escrow Fund
Project Fund
Cost of Issuance Fund
Interest Account
Principal Account
Special Tax Fund
Reserve Fund
Acquisition Fund
Agency Account
Cost of Issuance Fund
Interest Account
Water District Account
Special Taz Fund
Reserve Fund
Acquisition Fund
Agency Account
Cost of Issuance Fund
Interest Account
Water District Fund
Purchase
Date
9/18/2001
9/18/2001
9/18/2001
9/18/2001
8/31 /2006
8/31 /2006
Maturity
Date
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 7!13/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Markel Fund 7113/2006 N/A
Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A
Money Markel Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1!25/2007 N/A
Money Market Fund 1/25/2007 N/A
Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand.
Cost
Yield Value
2.04% $ 199.10
2.15% 78,523.33
2.15% 9,059.65
2.15% 12,391.40
2.15% 30,603.65
0.00% 6.63
$ 130,983.76
0.00% $ 2.03
2.74% 3,178,723.31
0.00% 0.00
2.74% 2,061,631.57
0.00% 0.00
2.74% 1,121,476.44
2.91% 241.38
$ 6,362,074.73
0.00% $
2.89% 382,102.56
2.69% 1,922,468.97
2.89% 771,957.72
2.89% 109,216.83
2.89% 141,997.63
2.89°h 689,122.12
$ 4,016,667.83
0.00% $ -
2.89% 199,765.07
2.89°/ 312,035.76
2.89% 150,045.26
2.89% 82,088.84
2.89% 72,876.84
2.89% 625,665.44
$ 1,442,477.21
31,694,619.18
$ 31,694,619.18
V
N
STAFF REPORT
)iNGINi31?RING DI?1':\R'1'MENT
Date: April 16, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Cquncil
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineeri9~~
P73
,`
.. ,
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
Subject: APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES AND TO AUTHORIZE THE
ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE SOUTHBOUND I-15
ONRAMP WIDENING AT BASE LINE ROAD PROJECT, TO BE FUNDED FROM
ACCOUNT NUMBER 11243035650/1511124-0
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Southbound I-15
Onramp Widening at Base Line Road Project, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City
Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids."
BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS
The existing southbound onramp to the I-15 Freeway at Base Line Road is presently inadequate. Over
the past several years, the opening of the Victoria Gardens Mall and the proliferation of nearby
residences has significantly increased the number of vehicles that use this onramp. On most weekday
mornings and weekends, there is a backup of vehicles waiting to use this onramp.
The decision by Caltrans to activate their traffic meter at the onramp has also amplified the delay.
This project will add an extra lane to the onramp, thereby allowing 2 vehicles to enter the freeway when
the Caltrans meter is activated instead of the present one vehicle. The increase in onramp capacity will
greatly reduce the backup of vehicles waiting to use this onramp.
Staff anticipates awarding a contract for construction on the June 4, 2008 City Council meeting.
Construction is expected to commence soon after award, with a two month construction period.
The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the Acting City Engineer.
The Engineer's estimate is $750,000 including contingency and administration. Legal advertising is
scheduled for April 24, 2008 and May 1, 2008, with a bid opening at 2 pm on Tuesday, May 20, 2008,
unless extended by Addenda.
uzri
Deputy ~ity Manager/Community Development
MA/W CS
P74
CITY OF RANCHO CUC_AMONGA
_-,~_ _ VICINITY MAP
SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP WIDENING AT
-~~=
BASE LINE ROAD PROJECT
'1 T I Y nri 'D A TTf^ITT/~ .-v~~. .~.. _ _ _ _ _
P75
RESOLUTION NO. ~ p- O7 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP
WIDENING AT BASE LINE ROAD PROJECT, IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for
the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for
"THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP WIDENING AT BASE LINE ROAD PROJECT".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work
specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be
substantially in the following words and figures, to wit:
NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o.m. on Tuesday, Mav 20 2008, sealed bids or
proposals for "THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP WIDENING AT BASE LINE ROAD
PROJECT" capital improvement project in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP
WIDENING AT BASE LINE ROAD PROJECT ".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not
less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the
locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of
per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of
Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general
prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on
file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The
Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site.
RESOLUTION NO.
April 16, 2008
Page 2
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or
mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or
mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any
work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in
any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of
the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a
certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will
be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such
cases shall not be less than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the
request of certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to
five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership
through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices
on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to
eight journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any
apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are
making such contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may
be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices.
P76
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with
and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set
RESOLUTION NO.
April 16, 2008
Page 3
forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as
amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by
him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each
calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the
work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the
applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section
17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's
bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the
amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the
same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers'
check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of
the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said
work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to
100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any
materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the
Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be
required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees
upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City
of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued
by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall
possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable
laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but
not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the
provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section
7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15,
shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and
be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being
provided is true and correct.
P77
RESOLUTION NO.
April 16, 2008
Page 4
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City
Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of
$35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when
said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non
reimbursable payment of $25.00 (TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing
charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in
the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP
WIDENING AT BASE LINE ROAD PROJECT" may be directed to: Walter C. Stickney,
Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4076.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 16~h day of April, 2008
Publish Dates: April 24, 2008 and May 1, 2008
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
this 16"' day of April, 2008.
Donald J. Kurth M.D., Mayor
ATTEST:
P78
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
April 16, 2008
Page 5
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the
certify that the foregoing Resolution was
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
held on the 16"' day of April, 2008.
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby
duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council
Executed this 16'h day of April, 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
P79
ADVERTISE ON: April 24, 2008 and May 1, 2008
STAFF REPORT
ENG1NI;fiR1NC DIa.PiVi'CMEN"1'
Date: April 16, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Com~mu~ni/ty Development
By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer~}^l
P80
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
Subject: APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES AND TO AUTHORIZE THE
ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE SOUTHBOUND I-15
ONRAMP WIDENING AT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PROJECT, TO BE FUNDED FROM
ACCOUNT NUMBER 1 1 243035650/1 51 31 24-0
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Southbound I-15
Onramp Widening at Foothill Boulevard Project, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the
City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids."
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The existing southbound onramp to the I-15 Freeway from eastbound Foothill Boulevard is presently
inadequate. Over the past several years, the opening of the Victoria Gardens Mall and the proliferation
of nearby residences has significantly increased the number of vehicles that use this onramp. On
weekday mornings and on most weekends, the backup of vehicles lining up to use this onramp extends
all the way to Day Creek Boulevard.
The decision by Caltrans to activate their traffic meter at the onramp has also amplified the delay.
This project will add an extra lane to the onramp. This will greatly increase the capacity of vehicles
using the onramp.
Staff anticipates awarding a contract for construction on the June 4, 2008 City Council meeting.
Construction is expected to commence soon after award, with a two month construction period.
The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the Acting City Engineer.
The Engineer's estimate is $1,000,000 including contingency and administration. Legal advertising is
scheduled for April 24, 2008 and May 1, 2008, with a bid opening at 2 pm on Tuesday, May 20, 2008,
unless extended by Addenda.
Mahdi
Manager/Community Development
MANVCS
P81.
UPLAND
:.CITY OF REINCHO CUCAMONGA.
~4~
e ~ Y6yN ~K
wnw ~~: k ~ 1
VC ~-n d~
E
K 0 C 1'
~~
'
~
_
~~ M
I
~
I °
a..~ ' PROJECT
u
f~„ ~° LIMITS a ~~~ ~ , ,..
° to ~ ~~.o $
rl
/
Y t' y
, _ SOOp
l
~.
r
s w
'
~
I
ONTANA
i i :_
CITY OF RANCHO CUC_AMONGA
. ~.:._ VICINITY MAP
~=J SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP WIDENING AT
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PROJECT
P82
RESOLUTION NO. O p - D ~ /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP
WIDENING AT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PROJECT, IN SAID
CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for
the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for
"THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP WIDENING AT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PROJECT".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work
specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be
substantially in the following words and figures, to wit:
NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offces of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o.m. on Tuesday. May 20, 2008, sealed bids or
proposals for "THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP WIDENING AT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
PROJECT" capital improvement project in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP
WIDENING AT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PROJECT ".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not
less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the
locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of
per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of
Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general
prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on
file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
RESOLUTION NO.
April 16, 2008
Page 2
Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The
Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or
mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or
mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any
work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in
any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of
the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a
certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will
be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such
cases shall not be less than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the
request of certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to
five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership
through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices
on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to
eight journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any
apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are
making such contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage .schedules, and other requirements may
be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices.
P83
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with
RESOLUTION NO.
April 16, 2008
Page 3
and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set
forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as
amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by
him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each
calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the
work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the
applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section
17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's
bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the
amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the
same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers'
check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of
the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said
work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to
100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any
materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the
Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be
required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees
upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City
of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued
by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall
possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable
laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but
not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the
provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section
7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15,
shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and
be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being
provided is true and correct.
P84
RESOLUTION NO.
April 16, 2008
Page 4
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifcations, available at the office of the City
Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of
$35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when
said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non
reimbursable payment of $25.00 (TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing
charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in
the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "THE SOUTHBOUND I-15 ONRAMP
WIDENING AT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PROJECT" may be directed to: Walter C. Stickney,
Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4076.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 16'" day of April, 2008
Publish Dates: April 24, 2008 and May 1, 2008
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
this 16"'day of April, 2008.
Donald J. Kurth M.D., Mayor
ATTEST:
P85
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
April 16, 2008
Page 5
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council
held on the 16'h day of April, 2008
Executed this 16'h day of April, 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
P86
ADVERTISE ON: April 24, 2008 and May 1, 2008
STAFF REPORT
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPAR'T'MENT
Date: April 16, 2008 RANCHO
cUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Kevin McArdle. Community Services Director
By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
Subject: APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of recreation programs,
projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs
occurring in the Community Services Department. This report is provided to the City Council for
informational purposes only.
Seniors:
• The table on the following page highlights some senior activities that take took place during
March 2008 as well as the total number of registrations for the year for Wellness Pass.
Activity Date Number of
Participants
Pool Tournament Mach 7, 2008 16
Senior Bi Band Dance March 8, 2008 122
St. Patrick's Da March 13, 2008 220
Senior Birthda s March 26, 2008 179
Wellness Pass - A es 60+ Total Re istered - 810
Wellness Pass - A es 50-59 Total Re istered - 313
Silver Fox Ex ress Total Re istered - 271
• Upcoming Senior Activities are summarized below:
Activit Date Time
S rin Flin Aril 3, 2008 9:30 a.m.
Pool Tournament Aril 4, 2008 1:00 .m.
Senior Bi Band Dance Aril 12, 2008 7:00 .m.
Earth Da Aril 22, 2008 10:15 a.m.
Senior Birthda s Aril 30, 2008 11:30 a.m.
P87
• The Senior Advisory Committee will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, April 28, 2008 at
9:00 a.m. at the James L. Brulte Senior Center.
P88
APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
APRIL 16, 2008
PAGE2
Participation in the Senior Nutrition Prooram for the month of March 2008 is summarized in the
table below:
Week Date Partici ants
1 3/3/08-3/7/08 1,328
2 3/10/08-3/14/08 1,295
3 3/17/08-3/21/08 1,266
4 3/24/08-3/28/08 1,208
Total meals served for the month of March 2008: 5,097
Trips and Tours:
Upcomino Trips and Tours activities are summarized below:
Tri Date
New York Aril 17, 2008
Gett Villa Malibu Ma 1, 2008
Grand Can on Ma 5, 2008
Tin Pan Alle Ma 7, 2008
Human Services:
• The table below summarizes participation in Human Services activities during the month of
March 2008:
Program Number of
Participants
Blood Pressure Screenin 29
Resource Libra 90
Commodities 452
Bereavement Su ort 18
Elder Law Private Counselin 25
HICAP 3
Dr. Cohen - "The Doctor is In" 2
Peo le with Arthritis Can Exercise PACE 260
Sit and Be Fit 124
Upcoming Human Services activities are summarized below:
Pro ram/Activit Date Time
R.C. Annual Communit Wellness Fair April 25, 2008 4:00 m - 8:00 pm
Special Needs Programs:
• The table on the following page highlights some of the special needs activities that took place
during March 2008:
P89
APPROVAL OF THE COIvIMLJI`IITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
APRIL I6, 2008
PAGE 3
Activit Number of Partici ants
G mnastics 3
Star Performers 35
Martial Arts - Be innin 6
Martial Arts -Intermediate 2
Upcoming Special Needs activities are summarized below:
Activit Date Time
Frida Ni ht Fun Club -Tiki Tiki Luau Aril 11, 2008 5:30 m - 7:30 m
Martial Arts - Be innin March 26, 2008 5:00 m - 6:30 m
Martial Arts -Intermediate March 26, 2008 6:30 m - 8:00 m
Ballroom -Social Dance March 31, 2008 4:30 m - 5:20 m
Ballet - S ecial Needs Aril 3, 2008 3:00 m - 3:45 m
Movement and Tumblin Aril 3, 2008 4:00 m - 4:50 m
Ta - S ecial Needs Aril 3, 2008 5:00 m - 5:45 m
Star Performers -Intermediate Aril 2, 2008 5:30 m - 7:00 m
Star Performers - Be innin Aril 2, 2008 7:00 m - 8:30 m
IncredABLES Cookin Corner Aril 9, 2008 3:00 m - 4:00 m
Festival of Arts Aril 26, 2008 9:30 am - 3:00 m
Prom Ma 16, 2008 5:30 m - 9:00 m
Tech Junction:
The table below summarizes participation in Tech Junction activities for the month of March
2008:
Senior Computer Classes Date Number of
Partici ants
Introduction to Windows and PC's March 3, 4, 10, 11 20
Introduction to Surfin the Internet March 17, 18, 24, 25 20
Introduction to Power Point March 5, 6, 12, 13 20
Introduction to Word Processin March 19, 20, 26, 27 20
Advance Power Point Worksho March 7, 14, 21, 28 20
Tech Junction Date Number of
Participants
Dro In-Use March 969
Upcoming free Senior Computer and Contract Class activities are summarized below and on
the following page:
Senior Com uter Classes Date
Introduction to Windows and PC's Aril 2, 3, 9, 10
Introduction to Surtin the Internet Aril 16, 17, 23, 24
Introduction to Excel April 7, 8, 14, 15
Introduction to Word Processing April 4, 11, 18, 25
Managing Multimedia April 21, 22, 28, 29
Introduction to Windows and PC's Ma 5, 7, 12, 14
P90
APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
APRtL16,2008
Senior Com uter Classes Date
Introduction to Surfing the Internet May 9, 16, 23, 30
Excel Workshop May 19 21, 26, 28
Introduction to Word Processing May 6, 8, 13, 15
Word Workshop May 2, 22, 27, 29
Contract Computer Classes Date (8 weeks)
Intro to Typing and Microsoft Word March 27, 2008
Microsoft Publisher Tools and Digital
Camera March 27, 2008
Intro to Microsoft Word and Excel March 27, 2008
Intro to Computer and Internet March 27, 2008
Volunteers:
PAGE 4
The table below summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usage for the
month of February 2008.
Division February 2008
# of
# of Vols. Hours $ Value* July -February 2008
# of
# of Vols. Hours $ Value*
Administration 5 15 $296 40 120 $2,369
Senior Services 145 1,667 $32,907 1,258 14,336 $282,993
Human Services 38 127 $2,507 282 930 $18,358
S orts 114 1,568 $30,952 956 8,712 $171,975
S ecial Events 4 12 $237 349 659 $13,009
Performin Arts 81 725 $14,312 746 6,205 $122,487
Teens 37 178 $3,514 449 5,296 $104,543
Youth Pro rams 0 0 $0 10 386 $7,620
Totals 424 4,292 $84,724 4,090 36,644 $723,353
'Based on $19.74/hour-State average as determined the California Independent Sector
Rental/Attendance at Central Park:
• The table below illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance figures for our
community facilities during the month of March 2008:
Facility Rentals # Rentals/
Bookin s Rental
Attendance Building
Attendance
James L. Brulte Senior Center 95/243 5,450 20,500
Gold S. Lewis Communit Center 112/262 13,603 14,401
Youth:
• The table on the following page summaries youth orogram attendance for the month of March.
P91
APPROVAL OF TIC COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
APRIL 16, 2008
PAGE 5
Program Classes/Sites Registrants/Attendance
Pla school 65/5 891/6953
Pla camp N/A N/A
Cam Cucamon a N/A N/A
Kid Ex lovers N/A N/A
Lewis Partnership Kids Club @
Evergreen, & Terra Vista
A artments
4 sites
192
• The new Plavschool mascot, Leo's was introduced at his Birthday Bash on Thursday, March
27'", to over 250 youngsters who attended the event.
• The table below provides the spring Mobile Recreation "Fun on the Run"schedule. Attendance
for the month of March was 231,
Da of the Week Park Location Time Frame
Monda Bear Gulch 2:30-5 m
Tuesda Hermosa 2:30-5 m
Wednesda Windrows 2:30-5 m
Thursda Ellena 2:30-5 m
Frida Old Town 2:30-5 m
Teens:
• The table below summarizes Teen Program Attendance for the month of March.
Pro ram/Activit Attendance /Partici ation
Teen Center 400 Partici ants / 96.5 hrs
Teen Dance, S ecial Events 62 Partici ants/ 24 hrs
Teen Center, CSD Rental, Meetin s 45 Partici ants / 6 hrs
TRAC Meetin s, Snack Bars, S ecial Pro'ects 51 Volunteers / 127 hrs
TRAC- Bab sittin 75 Partici ants / 28 Volunteers / 180.5 hrs
Teen Connection- S ecial Events 48 Volunteers/ 142 hrs. & 15 Volunteer/ 90 hrs.
Worksho s & Seminars 25 Partici ants,9 hours
Youth Sports:
• The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period:
Activity #
Partici ants Age/Gender #
Teams
Pee Wee Basketball 411 3-5/bo s & iris 48
Youth Basketball 706 7-15/bo s & iris 86
Youth Volle ball 190 8-14/bo s & iris 16
Northtown O en Pla 33 6-13/bo s & iris N/A
Northtown Cheerleadin Class 4 5-14/bo s & irls N/A
Northtown Hi -Ho 13 5-14/bo s & irls N/A
Northtown 3-on-3 Basketball 20 6-14/bo s & irls 4
CMS Youth Basketball Games 70 9-13 iris 8
CMS Youth Basketball Team Practices 584 7-13/bo s & irls 81
P92
APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
APRIL 16, 2008
PAGE 6
CMS Judo 42 7-12/bo s & iris N/A
RC Family Sports Center:
The table below provides drop-in/open plat/ and rental participation at the Center for the
reporting period:
Activit #Partici ants
Adult Basketball 506
Youth Basketball 831
Adult Rac uetball 484
Youth Volle ball 3
Adult Wall ball 7
Youth Wall ball 30
Jazzercise 935
Rentals 540
Adult Sports:
The table below summarizes adult sport activities for the reporting period:
Activit #Partici ants # Teams Gender
Softball 2,421 167 Males/Females
Tennis 12 N/A Males/Females
Basketball 260 379 Males
Rac uetball 14 N/A Males
Rac uetball 4 N/A Females
Northtown Hi Ho Aerobics 3 N/A Males/Females
There were two (2) adult softball tournaments during the month of February at the Epicenter and
Adult Sports Park. Two additional adult softball tournaments were cancelled due to the weather.
Special Events:
• Avery successful Job Fair was held on Saturday, March 29`h at the Cultural Center by the
Community Services Department. Over three hundred attendees applied for the Department's
124 summer and year round part-time positions.
Staff is working with the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation's Gala Subcommittee for
the upcoming 2008 Gala for the Arts that are scheduled for April 18`h at the Cultural Center.
Cultural and Performing Arts:
The table below summarizes Theatre Arts Academv classes during the reporting period:
Activit Partici ants/Attendance
Adult Choral Trou e 71
Teen Actors Boot Cam 53
Youth Theatre Worksho (agesll-15) 86
Sin in for a Lifetime 49
Broadwa Babies 42
Showsto ers 61
First Ste s: Introduction to Actin 51
P93
APPROVAL OF TIC COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
APRIL 16, 2008
Activit Partici ants/Attendance
Musical Theatre Worksho 89
Youth Theatre Worksho (ages 6-10) 94
Total 596
• Community Theatre rehearsals included the following during the reporting period.
Activit Partici ants/Attendance
The Secret Garden 35
Rental Activities:
PAGE 7
The table below summarizes rental activities in Celebration Hall at the Cultural Center for the
reporting period:
Celebration Hall Rental Events
Date Event Attendance
3/1/08 LA Church of Christ -services 264
3/4/08 Telos Breakthrou h Princi les -meetin 188
3/4/08 Dr. Zarif -meetin 48
3/6/08 National Medical Auxiliar -meetin 170
3/9/08 Pristine World Travel -meetin 42
3/11/08 UPS -meetin 75
3/11/08 Dr. Zarif -meetin 43
3/12/08 Isse Institute -meetin 24
3/12/08 CREW Inland Em ire 54
3/13/08 SBC Re ublican Part -meetin 65
3/14/08 Buildin Indust Association -meetin 81
3/18/08 Dr. Zarif -meetin 38
3/19/08 Southland Title -meetin 275
3/22/08 Jehovah Witness -meetin 321
TOTAL 7,688
Lewis Family Playhouse:
• During the reporting period, the Lewis Family Playhouse was host to a wide variety of
productions, community programs and private rentals. The table below and on the following
page summarizes this information for the reporting period:
Lewis Family Playhouse Professionally Presented Productions
NUMBER OF
SHOW DATE Tickets Sold EVENTS
Tomas and the Library Lady 3/11/08, 3/12/08 & 3/13/08 3,060 7
Magic of Ireland 3/15/08 809 2
Rob Lake - A Night of Magic 3/29/08 612 2
P94
APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
APRIL 16, 2008
PAGE 8
Lewis Famil Pla house Communit Theatre Productions
SHOW
DATE
Tickets Sold NUMBER OF
EVENTS
The Secret Garden 3/1/08, 3/2/08, 3/7/08, 3/8/08 &
3/9/08 1,639 5
Lewis Famil Pla house Rental Events
San Bernardino County Sheriffs 3/26/08 600 1
The table above reflects number of tickets sold for various performances during the reporting period. It does not reflect
actual patrons in attendance.
Public Lobby:
The Lobbv to the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center is open to the public seven days a week.
During the reporting period 1,228 visitors informally toured public areas of the facility.
Recreation Classes:
Registration for the spring session of recreation activities started on March 10'h, and classes
started on March 29'". Spring session is 10-weeks long and will end on June 6"', 2008. Three
hundred sixty-five (365) classes at 30 different sites throughout the City are being offered during
this timeframe.
Facilities:
The table on the following page illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance
fi ures for our community facilities during the month of March 2008:
Facility Rentals # Rentals/Bookings Rental
Attendance Building
Attendance
Lions Center East 16/108 1,036 5,958
Lions Center West 42/133 2,046 3,717
James L. Brulte Senior Center 95/243 5,450 20,500
Gold S. Lewis Communit Center 112/262 13,603 14,401
Staff continues to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center (Alta Loma Riding Club,
Rancho Rebels 4-H, Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy and Rancho Cucamonga Citizen Mounted
Patrol) to address maintenance needs and programming.
Parks:
The table on the following page provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special
use facilities for the month of March 2008:
P95
APPROVAL OF THE CONIMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT
APRIL 16, 2008
Park/Shelter Attendance/Partici ants # Rentals
Red Hill 1,567 40
Herita a 84 23
Milliken 581 23
Hermosa 341 14
Co ote Can on 254 11
Civic Center Court and 200 1
Am hitheatre Red Hill Park 100 5
TOTAL 3,917 117
Equestrian Rentals/Drop-in Use Participants: 370
S ectators:50 22
PAGE 9
Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of
assistance.
Epicenter Rentals/Activities:
The following event took place at the Epicenter during the reporting period:
A plicant Event Location Date
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Walk-a-thon Exterior streets surrounding April 5, 2008
Society the Epicenter and Parking
Lots A & B and the grass
area ad scent to the site
Staff is working with the following applicants for upcoming 2008 rentals and activities at the
Epicenter:
A licant Event Location Pro osed Date
Okoye Foundation Sports Clinic Adult Sports Fields at the May 11, 2008
Epicenter
City/Community Playschool Graduation Epicenter Stadium May 22, 2008
Services
De artment
8-12 Pictures Commercial Filmin E icenter Stadium Ma 24, 2008
Daily Bulletin All Star Game Epicenter Stadium June 10 & 12,
2008
Rancho Cucamonga 2008 Graduation Epicenter Stadium June 11, 2008
Hi h School
Pacific Coast All Star Games Epicenter Stadium June 22, 2008
Baseball
City/Community 4 of July Spectacular Epicenter Stadium July 4, 2008
Services
De artment
Pacific Coast Championship Games Epicenter Stadium August 24, 2008
Baseball
City/Community Founders Festival TBD October/November
Services 2008
De artment
The Public Works Division has scheduled major renovation projects for the Epicenter during the
timeframe of September 2151 through December 2008.
P96
APPROVAL OF TI-lE COMMUNITYSERVICESUFDATE REPORT PAGE 10
APRIL 16, 2008
Park and Recreation Commission:
The Park and Recreation Commission's next meeting is scheduled for April 17, 2008. At this
meeting the items are agenized for discussion:
- Discussion regarding the Park and Recreation Commission community forum to be held at
the May 15, 2008 Commission meeting.
- Consideration of formation of a Central Park Phase II Subcommittee.
- Senior Advisory Committee update.
- Sports Advisory Committee update.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
The Community Foundation continues to work securing significant donations for the Victoria
Gardens Cultural Center.
The Foundation continues to meet monthly through their various Committees and Sub-
committees: Executive Committee, the Membership/Nominating Sub-Committee, the Fund
Development Sub-Committee and the Finance Sub-Committee.
The next Community Foundation's board meeting is their annual meeting which is scheduled for
Wednesday, June 11, 2008.
Respe ttully ubmitted,
~/
Kevin~Ardle
Community Services Director
l:I COMMSERVICounci188oardslCityCouncillStaltReports120081 CSD. Update.4.16.08. doc
STAFF REPORT - {
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: April 16, 2008 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner ~~,~
Subject: APPROVAL TO CHANGE THE PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF GARCIA PARK FROM PARK DEVELOPMENT TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.9; AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE
$1,100,000 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1139303-5650/1313139-0 FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF GARCIA PARK
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve to change the primary funding source for the
construction of Garcia Park from Park Development to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, as
well as, authorize to appropriate $1,100,000 into Account No. 1139303-5650/1313139-0 from Fund
Balance for the construction of Garcia Park.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
At their meeting on March 5, 2008, the City Council awarded a contract to C. S. Legacy
Construction, Inc. for the construction of Garcia Park in the amount of $1,831,717.25 (plus a 10%
contingency) to be funded from Park Development Account No. 1120305-5650/1313120-0.
Due to budgetary constraints, it was later determined by staff that it would be more fiscally prudent
to fund the construction of Garcia Park from an additional funding source in conjunction with-Park
Development funds rather than solely relying on limited Park Development funds. Therefore, staff
will be using Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 funds to be the primary funding source for the
construction in the amount of $1,100,000 with the balance being charged to Park Development in
an amount not to exceed $914,889.
Aluzri
! City Manager/Community Development
P97
MA: kme/jmf
P98
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CRANCHo
Date: April 16, 2008 UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Enginee~~
Subject: REIMBURSEMENT TO THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCAITED GOVERNMENTS
(SANBAG) FOR THE CITY'S SHARE OF THE COSTS FOR CONSTRUCTING THE
HIGHLAND AVENUE GARDEN WALL ALONG THE 210 FREEWAY -FROM EAST OF
HERMOSA AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE AND FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO
BERYL AVENUE PER SANBAG CONTRACT NO.•04-052 AND ITS AMENDMENT NO. 1,
AND TO APPROPRIATE $356,060 TO FUND 120 -PARK DEVELOPMENT (ACCOUNT
N O. 11203055650/ 133512-0 )
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council reimburse the San Bernardino Associated Governments
(SANBAG) for the City's share of the costs for constructing the Highland Avenue garden wall along the
210 Freeway -from east of Hermosa Avenue to Amethyst Avenue and from Hellman Avenue to Beryl
Avenue per SANBAG Contract No. 04-052 and its Amendment No. 1, and to approve an appropriation
of $356,060 to Fund 120 -Park Development (Account No. 11203055650/133512-0).
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
When the 210 Freeway was being constructed, a sound study stated that sound walls were not needed
along two segments of Highland Avenue just north of the 210 Freeway. The segments are from east of
Hermosa Avenue to Amethyst Avenue and from Hellman Avenue to Beryl Avenue.
After the freeway opened, the noise level along both segments of Highland Avenue increased.
However, the Caltrans criteria for requiring the installation of a sound wall were still not met. In an effort
to give affected residents some relief, the City and SANBAG entered into an agreement (SANBAG
Contract No. 04-052) to evenly share the costs for constructing a 6 foot high garden wall along both
segments of Highland Avenue. Amendment No. 1 to this agreement stated that SANBAG would
construct the garden wall as part of its project to landscape the same stretch of the 210 Freeway. The
City would then reimburse SANBAG for the City's share of the garden wall construction costs.
The garden wall has been constructed and SANBAG has requested reimbursement for the City's share
of the construction costs. City staff has reviewed the SANBAG invoice and concur with the cost
summary.
Mah i Aluzri
Dep y City Manager/Community Development
nnn
~a
.s
i
=;
~
k, ~ .~
-
- .
. ,
..
~
,HIGHLAND AVE FREEWAY WALL
d
' _
,
U w
~
f ~ ~
_
i ` _
W :
~`~
};
Highland Avenue Freeway Wall
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTb1ENT
Date: April 16, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager
By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent
~'. ` ,~.
RANCHO
~UCAMONGA
P100
Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ASSI
SECURITY TO CONTINUE AS A SINGLE SOURCE VENDOR FOR THE REPAIR,
MAINTENANCE AND UPGRADE OF ACCESS CONTROL AND RELATED SECURITY
SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $140,000 ANNUALLY TO BE FUNDED
FROM VARIOUS CITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACCOUNTS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency and City Council approve and authorize a Professional
Services Agreement with ASSI Security to continue as a single source vendor for the repair, maintenance and
upgrade of access control and related security services in the amount not to exceed $140,000 annually to be
funded from various City and Redevelopment Agency accounts.
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
ASSI Security of Irvine, California is the provider of keyless entry hardware and maintenance for the system
that replaced our old "Card Key' system several years ago. The current fiscal year budget includes funding
for ongoing repair and maintenance throughout the City as well as a small capital project to improve and
expand the system at the R.C. Family Sports Center. We typically expend $40k to $50k annually for upkeep,
repair and minor upgrades to the system. However, this year we have experienced increased repairs,
remodeling, and upgrades, making it necessary to repair and/or augment the security system(s) at various
facilities. Although we have not yet exceeded the $50k annual expenditure limit, we are rapidly approaching
an emergency situation with delayed projects at Animal Care, the RC Family Sports Center, Cultural Arts
Center and the new RC Resource Center which combined will easily put us over the limit.
There is adequate funding in the various City and Agency accounts and we do not anticipate a request for
additional appropriations at this time. With the extremely critical nature of these security systems, their
relation to the protection of the City's facilities and occupants, the need for consistent confidentiality, the fact
that it is a citywide security system and the history of excellent service and competitive pricing, we
recommend that City Council designate ASSI as the single source provider for access control and related
security services.
jspectfully Submitt~G p
Dave Blevins ,\v/\~///,J
Public Works Maintenance Manager
DB:TO:jau
P101
the city of
Rancho Cucamonga
Staff Report
DATE: April 16, 2008
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Lack lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director
BY: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
RBF CONSULTING, NOT TO EXCEED $185,830, FOR THE PREPARATION OF A
AN INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND/OR
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (DRC2008-00263) FOR THE BIANE
BUSINESS PARK PROJECT, WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO
BE FUNDED FROM THE DEVELOPER DEPOSIT THROUGH ACCOUNT
10013145303.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council, through minute action, authorize the
mayor to execute the Professional Services Agreement awarding the contract to RBF Consulting.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This item was continued from the April 2, 2008 City Council meeting
at the request of the applicant. The City has received an application to demolish an existing winery
facility to develop a 239,370 square foot industrial warehouse building on a 10.41-acre parcel
referred to herein as "Biane Business Park" located at 10013 East 8th Street, Rancho Cucamonga,
CA 91730. The existing winery facility, Biane Winery, consists of approximately 13 industrial
buildings including; a winery building, bottling plant and warehouse, grape crushing building,
distillery, bonded warehouse, and three single-family homes that range from 900 to1,200 square
feet in size. Additionally, there is approximately 1.14 acre of active grape vineyards on the subject
site. The Biane Winery was originally established circa 1910 as the Cucamonga Vintage Co. and
has been identified in previous cultural reports as appearing to be eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places.
The current project site is designated as General Industrial (GI), Subarea 5, on the Land Use Map
and General Industrial on the City's General Plan. No Development DistrictAmendment orGeneral
Plan Amendment is required to accommodate the proposed project.
On January 17, 2008, LSA Associates, Inc. was selected to prepare the Cultural Resources
Assessment of the Biane Winery and update the State of California Department of Parks and
Recreation Forms (DPR 523A and 5236) for the property as part of the Cultural Assessment.
P102
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -RBF
April 16, 2008
Page 2
Additionally, on January 17, 2008 staff released the Request for Proposal (RFP) to several
environmental consulting firms in Southern California, to prepare an Initial Study for the Biane
Business Park and determine the appropriate CEQA document required for the project. If it is
determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an EIR/Focused EIR is required based on the
Initial Study, the selected consultant will process the appropriate document for the proposed project.
The City requested that interested candidates submit atwo-part proposal for the Initial Study and for
the Mitigated Negative Declaration/EIR if required.
Two consulting firms responded to the RFP and based on a review of the proposals submitted for
Scope of Services/Work with cost estimates, RBF Consulting has been selected for City Council
consideration. The contract is for $185,830.
The developer submitted to the City a deposit of $185,830 to the cover the costs associated with the
successful bidder's proposal for the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or
Environmental Impact Report preparation and processing.
Re~pe ttully sub fitted, _
~---~~ ~.1/I
Corkran W. Nicholson
Assistant Planning Director
CWN/CB/Is
Attachments: Exhibit A - Request For Proposal/Qualificaticns (RFP/RFO)
Exhibit B - RBF Consulting Proposal Dated February 19, 2008
P103
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
DATE: January 17, 2008
GOAL: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking proposals to prepare an Initial Study and determine the
appropriate CEQA required document for the Biane Business Park Project. The update must include specific
public participation opportunities, meet all legal requirements, and be user friendly with the most current
computer access processes and methods available.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City has received an application to demolish an existing winery facility to
develop a 239,370 square foot industrial warehouse building on a 10.41-acre parcel referred to herein as
"Biane Business Park" located at 10013 East 8th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. The existing
winery facility, Biane Winery, consists of nine existing structures including; a 75,000 square foot main
building, 16,000 square foot warehouse building, two storage facilities (1,000 square feet and 1,500 square
feet), and three single-family homes that range from 900 to1,200 square feet in size. Additionally, there is
approximately 1.14 acre of active grape vineyards on the subject site. The Biane Winery was originally
established circa 1910 as the Cucamonga Vintage Co. and has been identified in previous cultural reports as
appearing to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
The City is requesting proposals to prepare an Initial Study for the Biane Business Park and determine the
appropriate CEQA document required for the project. A California Department of Parks and Recreation
(DPR) form prepared in 2001 for the site is attached for your review. LSA Associates, Inc. is currently
preparing the Cultural Resources Assessment of the Biane W finery and is anticipating that the study will be
completed by early March. LSA Associates, Inc. will update the DPR 523A and 5236 forms for the property
as part of the Cultural Assessment. If it is determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an
EIR/Focused EIR is required based on the Initial Study, the selected consultant will process the appropriate
document for the proposed project. The City is requesting that interested candidates submit atwo-part
proposal for the Initial Study and for the Mitigated Negative Declaration/EIR if required.
The current project site is designated as General Industrial (GI), Subarea 5, on the Land Use Map and
General Industrial on the City's General Plan. No Development District Amendment or General Plan
Amendment is required to accommodate the proposed project.
If it is determined that an EIR is required, the document shall be in conformance with State and City
requirements and include the following basic components:
• Initial Study and Notice of Preparation
• Screen Check EIR
• Draft EIR
• Response to Comments
• Final EIR
• Mitigation Monitoring Program
~Xh,'6, ~ ./~
P104
BIANE BUSINESS PARK PROJECT DRC2007-00951
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
January 17, 2007
Page 2
• EIR Certification Process
• Public Hearings - Up to a total of four public hearings, two before the Planning Commission and two
before the City Council.
• Findings for EIR Certification, including over-riding if needed.
• Final EIR
• Program Administration
• Meetings, Graphics, and Time Table
• Time Frame including present status.
• City Staff Meetings -Conducted at least once a month.
• Progress Reports -Submitted monthly.
• Intergovernmental Coordination
The Consultant shall be responsible for conducting all meetings; preparing agendas, public notices, mailing
lists; postage; and related activities.
The completed Initial Study and appropriate CEQA documents text, tables, charts, and maps must be user
friendly and be in a compatible format to the City's word processing software (Microsoft Word 97). In addition
to a minimum of 50 hard copies, the completed final update shall be made available on compact disks in a
readable format.
If it is determined that an EIR is required, the EIR maps shall be coordinated with the City's Planning
Department and Geographic Information System (GIS) staff and be formatted incompliance with existing City
software requirements (ARCVIEW).
SERVICES REQUIRED: If an EIR is required, the following special studies maybe required for analyzing
demolition related impacts:
1. A Traffic Impact Analysis as necessary to satisfy the requirements of the San Bernardino County
Congestion Management Program (CMP).
2. Air Quality Study.
3. Review of the submitted Hydrology and Drainage Study.
4. Short-term Noise Impacts.
5. Hazardous Materials Analysis.
Provide separate cost evaluations in your proposal for each study listed above.
AMOUNT BUDGETED: Applicant Deposit Required.
CONTRACT TYPE: The City uses a Fixed Fee -Plus Actual Amount of Other Expenses, a professional
service contract with a payment schedule based upon scheduled project component completion and City
acceptance of the work.
P105
BIANE BUSINESS PARK PROJECT DRC2007-00951
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
January 17, 2007
Page 3
QUALIFICATIONS: Relevant professional qualifications, management qualifications, relevant project
experience, logistical capabilities, financial qualifications, and special terms and conditions.
Technical disciplines needed include: acoustical engineer, traffic engineer, fire facilities planner, botanist, and
biologist.
EVALUATION: Each proposal will be evaluated by the City based on the following criteria:
1. Conciseness and clarity.
2. Professional qualifications and capability of the consultant team that is assigned to the project.
3. Ability of the consultant firm to commit the personnel and time necessary to complete the project in the
time frame outlined in the RFP response.
4. Experience with similar type projects.
5. Demonstration of a clear understanding of the project and the work to be performed.
6. Competitive cost.
The firms that most closely meet the City's needs shall be invited to a presentation and evaluation interview.
SUBMISSION DIRECTIONS: Firms interested in responding to this request must submit ten copies of their
proposal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Department, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
February 19, 2008. Proposals received after the prescribed date and time will not be considered.
Please address all proposals and inquires regarding this Request for Proposal to:
Candyce Burnett
Senior Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
.._. ~ .
LSA
June 13, 2001
LaA AaYOC1ATYY~ INC.
ONY PAYS PCw ZAP suite $oo
xaVINe~ CALIPO aN IA 9261Q
Anthea Hartig
City of Rancho Cucamonga Historical Program
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
C/ryOFRgNCHC CSC
J(/N gltjCNGA
RF 18 2001
CFIV ~C P~gNN/NG
Subject: Historic Consultation for Cingular Wireless Facility SB 139-O1, County of
San Bernardino, California
Dear Ms. Hartig:
LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) is under contract to Cingular Wireless (Cingular) to provide a cultural
resource assessment for Cingular facility number SB 139-01, located at 10013 Eighth Street, in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California. The assessment was conducted to
identify historic properties (prehistoric or historic sites, buildings, structures, objects, or districts listed
in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places [National Register]), as required
by 36 CFR Part 800, the regulations implementing Section ] 06 of the National Historic Preservation
Act of 1966, as amended.
The facility will consist of four panel antennas and three microwave dishes mounted to the tower
facade of a 70 year old building. Specifically, the antennas will be located near the top of the tower of
the building but will not project above the existing parapet. Associated equipment will be located on a
vacant landscaped area, adjacent to the building. Approximately 30 feet of trenching to the south will
be required to obtain utilities. Each antenna is approximately four feet in length and six inches wide
and will be painted and textured to match the existing facade. See Attachment A for a photocopy of
the site plans.
LSA architectural historian Judith Marvin has evaluated the building for the National Register of
Historic Places (National Register). The building is the Pierre Biane Winery, built in 1930 by an
unknown architect. The building does appear to be eligible for inclusion in the National Register
under Criteria A and C. Under Criterion A, it is associated with the history of viticulture in Rancho
Cucamonga. Under Criterion C, the possibility exists that it might become eligible because it posses
distinctive architectural characteristics. The building is a rare remaining example of the Mission style
of winery architecture in Southern California. "the Pierre Biane Winery was designed during the
period when buildings of Mission Revival architecture were being constructed for public, commercial,
and residential clients, and is a fine example of its type. Our recommendation to the California Office
of Historic Preservation will be that although the building appeazs eligible for the National Register, it
will not be adversely affected by the installation of Cingular facility SB 139-01. The antennas will be
designed in a way to preserve the visual character of the building, and the placement of the antennas
will be reversible in design, Included in Attachment B are the California Department of Parks and
Recreation Primary Record (DPR 523A) and Building, Structure, and Object Record (DPR 523B).
6/13/01« P:\Pbm030\Archaeo\letter\SB 139-OII1istCon.wpd))
PLANNING I QNVI¢ONYENTAL SCIINCES D¢SIGN
OTHES OPPICC6: FT. COLLINS P~06
949$$3 0666 rE1 YESRY LEY axveaslna
949~$$3~Y0]6 FAR PT. aICHl10NO aOC%LIN
P107
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC.
Pursuant to Section 36 CFR Part 800.3(e), LSA is contacting the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Historical Program to solicit comments regarding this Federal undertaking. If you have any comments
regarding this facility, please contact me within ten working days of receiving this letter. I can be
reached at the above address and telephone number or by e-mail at nicolew@Isa-assoc.com.
Sincerely,
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
Nicole Wallock
Archaeologist
Attachments: A -Site Plans
B - DPR Forms
6/13/01 ((P:\Pbm030\Archaeo\IetterlSB 139-Ol HistCon.wpd»
P108
L9A A990 CIATE9, INC. CINCULw0.
JUNE ]001 9a IIf-01
ATTACHMENT B
DPR FORMS
P'.\Pbm030Wrchaeo\lener\SB 139-Ol HistCon.wpd ((6/13/OU)
State of California -The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Other
Code Reviewer
Primary
xRI #
P109
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
rage ~ of 4 •xesource Name or if: (Assigned by recorder)Biane Winery
Pl.
*P2.
*P3a.
*P3b.
Other Ident~er: Padre Winery/Cucamonga Vintaee Company
Location: ^ Not for Publication ^ Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino
and (P26 and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date] 966 (1981 Photo revisedl T 1 South ;R 7 West ; SW t/a of NWT/a of Sec 14 _B.M.
c. Address 995] Eigth Street City _ Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 ;445840 mE / 3772320 mN
e. Other LoCational Data: (e.g., parcel 8, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
From Interstate 10 Exit Archibald Avenue. Travel south on Archibald heading towards Ontario International Airport.
Take the left fork in the ramp, left onto Archibald Avenue, right on to Street Eighth Stree[. Building is located on the
south side of Eighth Street, west of Turner Avenue.
Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition. alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)
See Continuation Sheet
Resource Attributes: ([ratatvibatesandeodes> HP8Industrial Building
i?o~.,..~....~ D...,..,...a. is _ .. .. n _ n __. .-, _. .~ ..
.Recorded by: (Name, affiliation,
address): Judith Marvin,
Date recorded: 5-27-2001
Attachments: None ®Location Map ^Sketch Map ®Continuation Sheet ®Building, Structure, and Object Record
^Archaeological Record ^District Record ^Linear Feature Record ^Milling Station Record ^Rock Art Record
^Artifact Record ^Photograph Record ^Other (List)
DPR 523A (1/95)
*Required Information
6/7/01 «P:1Pbm0301ArchaeoWrch Eval Forms\SB 139\SB 139Primary.wpd»
* P11. Report citation: (Cite survey report and other sources or enter "none.") Cultural Resource Assessment for Cin~ular Wireless
Facility No. SB 139-01, Prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., June 2001.
Paged of ~ *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Aiane Winery
*Map Name: Guacti, Ca1(f *Scale: 1:24 000 *Date of Map:. 1966 (19811
I
f
~~
~ lh~ ~ ~`
1, .. ,~ Il ! s ~, ~
' J,9rh ei ~
h 4<.M itl ~
~a .~~ ~t ...
(~
l ~ i i
~
~
e1~
r ~" ~ lR
L
w ~
.... ..~' r:::to
a
i
f`d l
t
,
~/
~~ .
F. entn
, ~
~
~Iµ~r
/
C ucamnnRa ~_
`j6N9Fa~ ~ ~G'6 HslOf iral Let ark) Ite, .~'
\ .k.- ~ 1 AIVI.
, -y
•
~.. ~'`wJ,
i
\
„Jp9 ~~ - Y ~
FOOSHa:
• A .» .. 11 S+
_ ~. O ...».
.....
i,• t I iANE 0 KtY
~~~..~ BM _
^'.
1J0A
~/ ! ~ ~ ... l/~ r~ ~
r
~ ~~ •~q
'~`'
k ~_ 2 ~ tie
j
'
~ ~ : i~T ~ Trs ler
t t. iY ~+ srk ~I ' u /. ~
i -_...
f_i~~,i -~..
-
I
~ ~i
e4 a a :'" ~ ..
i~ .~.
~ IIII i 1 ~
~i : ~
J
~
~ /
'/I 111 17..
~
, 7 ..
. 1 ..
- _= ,~D_ '
G
,' ~~
1L J
.E 1 1 h\~ ~ .11
1 `I,
z ...
1
-
_ .
-
..
~-
~o _ I ti.0 ^-\
}/~
,~~
.. ..Bld Cacvmonpa
.~~ (1
t
i ~ IKASK!•, ~ - -
;r;
.. -- ~
; DIANE
~ WINERY t
1 ._ .~.. ~ IWT
~` t:: ,111
.,
~ -_._ P
_
Sc.enth to 's / ..
9~' ~ P 7 ry t F ~ I
-~ ~~ '~l ~ .E ~ V I ..
) fEECER -...
1 [ ~
r ~i RCSe vo r ' Br
_
i
~J
~\ ~~ ~~~ -
~ ~~
•\.
`r~'
_- .
--..
a
- 'U ~ ~ ~ ~
1~.. 0
'` ~l_ C r
r
~
1`
1~ e
' ...
I
~
Wel
' r_.
'~~ I
~Ik
I
~
~
~
~ a
-_
^m
~
4
,_-.=1~1_
-___
,'~.~r"'-_._.r.,,'-
T- ~
p ~~ 44~ •'
.: ~ :J' r„a,.,.i~~h. '• ~_~~.
.. _1~~
~
~
_ - ......
~~
to ~`\ ~Bma
® 1- .._.._cr,e
._.._.. .-
Yfell t
' I __
.
_ _
' ~I ' t
~
-.__ _____
-
(~ \
~~'~ L~• ; i
'~ ~' , W
.,\
C~ y
~~~ y
.
I ~
a
'nit r
' ~ - -
o r
- ..
~' ~ S~ A !
_
u,vrt, t
>
e .. (g
1r I
I
I e
f ,
~ - -
a
.. x .. Pat_t
. ,'
,': Tark W
~
e
1~
.
px
!
E[' O
.., t
S
~ - .
~
SCALE 124,000
e ~'' e
1 la 0 t MILE ^ ' u I
R I 1000 0 ,000 200D 300D 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET N
' ;I r
~
1 .5 D 1 KILOMETER
TRUE ---
I"
~
~',: `
~.
.. .,
10
DPR 523J (1/95) *Required Informatioo
P111
i :TL!'rt3Jk`v ieF ~f~ .1~Y..yr, ' P`f'3S Y 4.s51Ry, M x7 if t; '~' F.~ f 'r 3i SJ •+ 1 Y 'n ' '~~..~' 1 ~'f.3"r'n" R`Ya 5i ' a^'y"~ ~e . cnr v
te`dfiCsltfornta~, '"Pbe~ResourcesvAgency~~'s ~+ai rt,f „~~Y~~,,~5,4~,~1,~~P,ramary';!{ ~ -~t~""~~,`7~~ .~~'~t~iiPt~--,~~k~, ~i
'S'~°r~GC• a L+'~ sv,- t~ ~ tartttavTr'rv :-J"u ,,.,5~ iG 11 J ..
i s F v .r s~„sp~ y~~x ,7't~,nr. ,~,-, ri~ r nb. ,.utf;k ^.
~DPP~T1NI~AT'Ii'°" a F'iPARI~S~~N'D,SRECREAtTzIb~l~iw~ sy-tYWfxf~~ HR1~xgsi~. ~ ~~' lrz.r`,s~~"":ue ~~.ka~r~wt:
~~.1w73'201h`'iY^fi3,ltr.'t~'S"rt Y~?,y nP`"'~wxk~'^1A?v,^SRty w. -M~:xd ~r Jk`av }~Ya"a " ~ "aF' v -Y I~~Ifk tAr ~r~ +~, ~rt'ri+i m
~CONTIEN~IJ1~iTTON" S~HEE~ "~` ~*~~~~ ~k ~~~zt~~ Y` 1~T~tnu ~a1~~~t~.a=~,~~~~'~,r"?~~~~~~~;~-.~"~.
. uY:.Y,-~'n.+:s.? d'L~.~ -a .,,t/an.,,S~`-a F~FFA":.'r`~:14::a'y3warko~ _~z~:a~ ~ '.~ ~~~'~''..~.~.-C'diJ`.`3il,.°%~~Lmu ru-x a-ra-vsrzrn-.~-c,--.•msaa~p avs-:-mss:;
Page 3 of 4 'Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) Biane Winery
"Recorded by Judith Marvin. LSA Associates, Inc. 'Date Mav 27. 2001 ®Continuation ^ Update
Pia. The Biane Winery consists of a complex of buildings, of various ages and architectural styles, all related to the winery
operations. The primary building, with a long rectangulaz mass and an end gabled, Mission rile roof is constructed of concrete
faced with granite river rock. The facade features a central raised, Mission style pazapet and series of arches, with chipped
granite surrounds and concrete sills. Fenestration in the arches consists of multi-light metal frame industrial sash. The upper
portions of the arches are clad in stucco and appear to have been filled in. Mission style castellated parapets are located at the
roofline on either end of the building; both feature hipped roofs and arches. Primary access is via a recessed entryway and the
original glass and frame door, flanked by windows, on the east fagade. Attached to the west elevation of the building is a long
brick rectangulaz sttvcrure with ten bays, which face north towards the railway spur. The building has a shed roof, relieving
arches over the bays, and brick pilasters and cornicing. The west elevation of the building features a large modem facade of
wood and stucco, with a sign advertising the Pierre Biane Winery.
The secondary building is an irregularly, shaped multiple story wood stmcrure connected with a corrugated meta] building on
the west and a shed roofed metal building on the south rear. A large square tower is located on the northeast comer of the
building; the pyramidal roof clad in corrugated metal. The main structure has a gable roof, also clad in corrugated metal. The
building is clad in horizontal V-mstic frame siding. Fenestration consists of ]/1 light frame sash, double hung, staggered at
various heights around the building. Doors are conswcted of vertical boards.
A grape crushing facility, a single story rectangular building of cast concrete, is located on the east end of the- property, south of
the primary building. Concrete grape loading pits are located on its north and south sides, with a metal conveyor belt extending
into the building. Fenestration and doors are of the standard industrial type. A simple Craftsman style office building is located
to the rear of the primary building. It has a ]ow pitched front gable roof with intersecting gabled entryway, horizontal lapped
siding, 1/1 double hung frame sash windows, and a post on pier foundation. Other facilities, including warehouses and sheds,
are located on the property.
The front yard of the winery features river rock pillars, connected with swagged chains, clipped hedges, and a lawn. Grape
vines are planted on the west side; the rear features a wisteria arbor, fan and date palms, orange groves, and pepper and
Eucalyptus trees.
DPR 523E (1/95) *Required Information
6/7/O]«P:U'bm030\Archaeo\Ash Eva] Foims\SB 139\SB139Con$hea.wpd»
P112
Bl. Historic Name: Padre Winerv/ Cucamonga Vineyard Comnanv
B2. Common Name: Biane Winerv
B3. Original Use: Winerv B4. Present Use: Winerv
*B5. Architectural Style: Mission Revival. Crafrsman
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
The primary building was constructed in 1909; the dates of the others are unknown, but appear to have been built over a period
of years dating to the 1950s.
*B7. Moved? ®No ~ Yes ~ Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features:
Buildings as noted on Primary Form; spur on Eighth Street
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme Agricultural and Commercial Develonment Area Rancho Cucamonga
Period of Significance 1909-nresent Property Type Winery Applicable Criteria A and C
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural wntext as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address in[egrityJ
The Biane Winery appears to be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A and C, and the
California Register of Historical Resources under Criteria 1 and 3. The Padre Winery Company, also operating under the name of
the Cucamonga Vineyard Company, was the leading winery in Southern California in the days afrerthe repeal of Prohibition and before
the beginning of World War I. The company, which dates from the 1870s, entered its modem period in 1909, when it was acquired
by James Vai. During Prohibition, the company operated as the California Medicinal Wine Co., but by the mid-1950s the 3.5 million
gallon winery was specializing in bulk process spazkling wine. Vai died in 1961, business declined in the 1970s, and the winery was
sold in bankruptcy in 1981. As one of the few wineries remaining in the Cucamonga area from the boom years of the eazly 1900s, the
winery continues in use today as it did when first established. It has one of a fast declining number of vineyards in the area; where
20,000 acres of vines were growing in 1960, there are only 1,000 in the 1990s. Under Criteria C and 3, the building is a rare remaining
example of the Mission style of winery azchitecmre in Southern California. The Padre Winery was designed during the period when
buildings of Mission Revival azchitecmre were being constructed for public, commercial, and residential clients and is a fine example
of its type (see continuation sheet)
BI1. Additional Resource Attributes: (List atvibutes and codes)
*B12. References: The Architecture of Los Angeles, Paul Gleye, Rosebud Books, Los Angeles, 1981; A Companion to California
Wine, Chazles L. Sullivan, University of California Press, Berkeley,1998; Primary and Building, Structure and Object Forms,
Lynn Merrill, 1987.
B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Judith Marvin
LSA Associates. Inc.
One Park Plaza. Suite 500
Irvine. CA 92614
*Date of Evaluation: Mav 27, 2001
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch Map with north arrow required.)
f--~-----.._:. ~o - -
--+--~
i °~ --_
.-o- o ~, L
~~~
L.~._...ii .
i
i
~~__J
~~
DPR 523B (1/95)
*Required Information
6/7/OI ((P:\Pbm030\ArchaeoWrch Eval Fortes\SB 139\SB 139BSO.wpdU
*Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) Biane Winery
iwa~
*`x. _ to r''-
'~ _~ ~- h/~y~,,
e~ P113r~~,
,.~ ,
,,
~- ~ February~19, 2008 ''"
e.
,.
~~. .~~.~
r~
,_
-~; r r {
~ f .
f'.
B~a.ne~ Fus~ess~
.~. ,f ..:~.. r,..:, .:~Fr ,
..y ,,
r ~
. Pa.r~ Pro ect ~. F
~ q ~ II
.Rr ~ ~ ,y
^ ' ~ .t F ~
i. _+ yt' ~Y .. ..
I ~y
4
I Xr I
i. 'I r
-Y l,. r 1 ,,;4
~nj'~ r/, _1- P
' rail - { 4
~ ~ - `~ n=
i ~. rf~a ., z ;,'
_r~ ~z ,:>
J
/ 3~ ~j+k ~ I~ ~• I
. G:-. '~ R 4f .~-' Y
;~ IT~. .. _. ... - .~
.. '' <.~ ~ r~ :~ a
~~ P
' n'~ ~'F ~ ^x' t tea., h~~
f A .mil
~.-wk~
y i.
.d; . .
Prepared for:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Prepared by:
RBF Consulting
~/xh ~ ~~~ f .[3
`,,
j:,
P114
~ ~ J
CON 5 U LTI N G CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
February 19, 2008 FEB 1 9 2008
Ms. Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner RECEIVED -PLANNING
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Subject: Proposal to Prepare CEQA Documentation for the Biane Business Park
Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga
Dear Ms. Burnett:
RBF Consulting is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) to
prepare an Initial Study and subsequent environmental document (either a Mitigated Negative
Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report) for the Biane Business Park Project. We
understand that the project site is located within the southwestern portion of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, along the southern side of East 8'~ Street, east of the Archibald Avenue, and west of
Hermosa Avenue. The project involves the redevelopment of the Biane Winery. The Biane Winery
is a 10.41 acre site and includes 1.14 acres of active grape vineyards. Existing uses also include
nine structures consisting of a main building, warehouse building, two storage facilities, and three
single-family homes. The proposal involves demolition ofthe existing structures and construction of
239,370 square feet of industrial warehouse uses.
Based upon our review of available project information, a visit to the site on February 12, 2008, and
our current work effort in Rancho Cucamonga for the Carrari Ranch Project, we have developed a
comprehensive understanding of the issues and concerns involved with the project. We believe
that our background in Rancho Cucamonga and the experience of our team members are key
attributes that we can provide to this assignment. In summary, RBF offers the following benefits for
your consideration:
• Project Team Commitment and Availability: The designated Team will be led by Mr.
Glenn Lajoie, AICP, serving as Project Director and Mr. Alan Ashimine, serving as Project
Manager. Resumes for each team member are included in this submittal.
• Legally Defensible Documentation: Throughout RBF's 36 years of preparing
environmental documentation, we have attained extensive experience in writing accurate,
legally defensible environmental documents for all types of development, policy, and
infrastructure projects.
Experience with Similar Projects: Our resume includes several infill/redevelopment
projects in highly sensitive environments. Project references include the Carrari Ranch
Project EIR in Rancho Cucamonga, the Pacific Trade Focused EIR in EI Monte, the
Colonies at San Antonio Specific Plan Amendment EIR in Upland, North Village Specific
Plan EIR for the Town of Mammoth Lakes, the Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel
PLANNING 0 DESIGN C CONSTRUCTION
14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618-2027 • P.O. Box 57057, Irvine, CA 92619-7057 • 949.472.3505 • Fax 949.472.8373
Offices located throughout California, Arizona & Nevada • www.RBF COm
o~~~me o~ r~.vcm mw~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
February 19, 2008
Page 2
EIR Project, Vineyard Center Specific Plan EIR in Ontario, the North Downtown Lancaster
Neighborhood Revitalization/Transitvillage Plan EIR/EA, the EI Centro de Huntington Park
in Huntington Park, and Cypress Business Park Environmental Review.
Multi-Disciplinary Capabilities: RBF possess a unique in-house network of over 1,000
professionals in disciplines including Planning/Environmental Services, Transportation
Engineering, Civil Engineering (including Grading, Public Works, Water/Wastewater and
Hydrology), Mechanical/Electrical/Energy Engineering, Computer Aided Design and Drafting
(CADD) and GIS Services, Mapping, Surveying, Aerial Photogrammetry and Media
Services, which results in a coordinated and efficient effort, with full-service consulting
capabilities within one firm.
Diverse Planning and Environmental Services: RBF's Planning Department offers an
extensive background of services and expertise for projects including Environmental Impact
Reports, Mitigated Negative Declarations, General Plans, Specific Plans, Due Diligence
Reports, Urban Design, Entitlement Processing, NEPA Review, Noise Studies, View
Analysis, Hazardous Assessments and Air Quality Modeling. The RBF Planning
Department also includes the Urban Design Studio (UDS) division.
Excellent Track Record of Meeting Schedules and Budgets: RBF has proven
capabilities to effectively complete environmental studies on time and on budget.
We appreciate your consideration of RBF Consulting for the Biane Business Park Project and are
available to begin the work program immediately. The undersigned is an agent authorized to
submit proposals on behalf of RBF Consulting and is authorized to negotiate with the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on this project.
We welcome the opportunity to meet with you to discuss further clarify the work program. Please
do not hesitate to contact me at 949.855.3663 if you have any questions or would like additional
information.
Sincerely,
Glenn Lajoie, AICP
Vice President
Planning and Environmental Services
P115
P116
PROPOSAL
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Biane Business Park Project
Prepared for:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Submitted by:
RBF CONSULTING
February 19, 2008
P117
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction and Understanding of the Project ..........................................................
1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................
1.2 Understanding of the Project ........................................................................
II. Scope of Work . ....................................................................................................................::
1.0 Project Scoping ........................................................................................................
1.1 Project Kick-Off and Project Characteristics ...............................................
1.2 Research and Investigation .........................................................................
1.3 Agency Consultation ...................................................................................
1.4 Field Reconnaissance .................................................................................
1.5 Preparation of the Initial Study ....................................................................
1.6 Initial Study Determination ..........................................................................
1.7 Deliverables .................................................................................................
2.0 Alterna tive 1 -Preparation of a MND ......................................................................
2.1 Preparation of a Screen Check MND ..........................................................
2.1.1 Environmental Analysis ..................................................................
2.1.2 Graphic Exhibits ..............................................................................
2.1.3 Screen Check Draft MND ...............................................................
2.2 Draft MND ....................................................................................................
2.3 Final MND ....................................................................................................
2.3.1 Response to Comments .........................:.......................................
2.3.2 Mitigation Monitoring Program ........................................................
2.4 Notice of Determination ...............................................................................
2.5 Meetings and Coordination .........................................................................
2.6 Deliverables .................................................................................................
3.0 Alterna tive 2 -Preparation of an EIR .......................................................................
3.1 Notice of Preparation ...................................................................................
3.2 Scoping Meeting ..........................................................................................
3.3 Preparation of a Screen Check EIR ............................................................
3.3.1 Introduction and Purpose ...............................................................
3.3.2 Executive Summary .......................................................................
3.3.3 Project Description .........................................................................
3.3.4 Thresholds of Significance .............................................................
3.3.5 Cumulative Projects to Be Considered ..........................................
3.3.6 Environmental Analysis ..................................................................
3.3.7 Effects Found Not to be Significant ................................................
3.3.8 Growth Inducement ........................................................................
3.3.9 Cumulative Impacts ........................................................................
3.3.10 Alternatives to the Proposed Action ...............................................
3.3.11 Additional Sections .........................................................................
3.3.12 Graphic Exhibits .............................................................................
3.4 Draft EIR ......................................................................................................
3.4.1 Preliminary Draft EIR ......................................................................
3.4.2 Completion of the Draft EIR ...........................................................
3.5 Final EIR ......................................................................................................
3.5.1 Response to Comments .................................................................
3.5.2 Mitigation Monitoring Program ........................................................
3.5.3 Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations ...................
3.6 Project Coordination and Meetings .............................................................
3.6.1 Coordination ...................................................................................
3.6.2 Meetings .........................................................................................
3.7 Deliverables .................................................................................................
....,
....1
....1
..4
..4
..4
..4
..4
..5
..5
..5
..5
..5
..5
.. 5
..7
..7
.. 7
.. 8
.. 8
......9
......9
....10
....10
....10
.....10
.....10
.....10
.....11
.....19
.....19
..:..19
.....19
.....20
.....20
.....21
.....21
.....21
.....21
....21
.....22
.....22
.....22
.....22
.....23
.....23
P118
3.7.1 NOP Distribution ......................................................................................23
3.7.2 Preparation of Screen Check Draft EIR ...................................................23
3.7.3 Draft EIR ..................................................................................................23
3.7.4 Final EIR ..................................................................................................24
III. Preliminary Project Schedule .........................................................................................................25
IV. Summary of Qualifications .............................................................................................................26
V. Project Team ..................................................................................................................................36
VI. Statement of Financial Conditions ..................................................................................................40
VII. Budget ...........................................................................................................................................42
1.0 Preparation of an Initial Study ...........................................................................................42
2.0 Preparation of an MND ......................................................................................................
3.0 Preparation of an EIR ........................................................................................................43
P119
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
^ ^ ^
CO NSLJ LTING
1. INTRODUCTION AND UNDERSTANDING OF
THE PROJECT
7.7 INTRODUCTION
RBF Consulting (RBF) has submitted this Proposal to prepare an Initial Study and either a
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to assess
potential impacts and identify mitigation measures for the proposed Biane Business Park
Project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Initial Study and subsequent environmental
document will be prepared in accordance with the criteria, standards and provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Section 21000 et. sec. of the State
EIR Guidelines (California Administrative Code Section 15000), the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Environmental Guidelines, and the regulations requirements and procedures of
any other responsible Public Agency with jurisdiction by law. RBF will, throughout the
document, and where appropriate, relate the proposed project to the general trends in
Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding area.
The proposed Scope of Services has been prepared in accordance with the City's Request
for Proposals. Each of the issues is approached thoroughly in order to fully assess all
potential impacts, establish thresholds of significance, and identify mitigation measures.
1.2 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking to retain a consultant to prepare an Initial Study
for the Biane Business Park Project. The project site is located within the southwestern
portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, along the southern side of East 8w Street, east of
Archibald Avenue, and west of Hermosa Avenue. The project consists of the
redevelopment of the former Biane Winery. The 10.41-acre project site is currently
occupied by active grapevines, a 75,000 square foot main building, 16,000 square foot
warehouse building, two storage facilities (1,000 square feet and 1,500 square feet), and
three single-family homes ranging from 900 to 1,200 square feet in size. The project
proposes to demolish the existing uses/structures and construct 239,370 square feet of
industrial warehouse building facilities.
The scale of the project, as well as its geographical location, requires consideration of
environmental, planning and design criteria. Careful consideration is necessary for on-site
conditions and compatibility of the projects with the surrounding community. RBF will serve
as an extension of City staff to assure that the entire CEQA process is conducted in a
comprehensive manner, which will include consideration of recent CEQA legislation and
requirements of reviewing agencies. The RBF project management team led by Mr. Glenn
Lajoie, AICP, and Mr. Alan Ashimine, will provide regular and consistent communications
and updates to staff on the progression of the work program and status of the analysis.
The project initiation will involve a detailed scoping process including a review of issues,
constraints and project opportunities. RBF will embark on an agency consultation process
which will be an opportunity to get a better understanding of key agency/community
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 1 February 19, 2008
P120
^ ^ ^
CONSLI LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
concerns. RBF will prepare an Initial Study to determine whether an MND or an EIR will be
necessary.
This proposal includes a scope of work to conduct an Initial Study. The Initial Study would
provide preliminary impact analysis, allowing the City to consider the project's
environmental and community effects and determine the appropriate subsequent
environmental document.
This proposal also includes two alternative scenarios following completion of the Initial
Study process for either an MND or EIR. Under either scenario, the primary issues having
the potential to result in a significant environmental impact are described below:
Aesthetics, Light, and Glare: RBF will evaluate the proposed project's potential
impacts in regards to aesthetics, light, and glare. RBF will analyze the existing
goals and policies within the General Plan, and any other applicable documents,
and assess the projects short- and long-term impacts on the surrounding
community.
Air Quality: Air emissions resulting from project construction and buildout will be
studied. Emissions associated with project vehicular trips will be evaluated in
accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's modeling
criteria.
• Cultural Resources: The environmental document will evaluate and analyze the
potential impacts to the existing structures on the project site. The structures on-site
will require detailed analysis, since preliminary analysis indicates that the structures
(dating back to the 1930's) could be eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places. RBF will utilize the existing Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for
the proposed project.
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials: RBF will analyze the potential hazards and
hazardous materials on-site. RBF will prepare a Preliminary Hazardous Materials
Assessment for the project and incorporate the findings of the study into the
environmental document.
Hydrology and Water Quality: The environmental document will analyze the
project's potential to affect water quality in the site vicinity as a result of off-site
drainage impacts, based on hydrology design information provided to RBF. RBF will
also perform a peer review of the prepared Hydrology and Drainage Study.
• Land Use and Relevant Planning: The environmental document will analyze the
project's consistency with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
• Noise: Project noise impacts to sensitive areas (schools and residents) in close
proximity to the site will be addressed. Impacts along local roadways and to
sensitive receptors in the vicinity will be analyzed.
• Transportation and Traffic: The environmental document will address on-site and
off-site traffic impacts, turning movements, parking, circulation modifications and
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 2 • February 19, 2008
P121
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSLI LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
improvements for nearby roadways and regional facilities, in accordance with City of
Rancho Cucamonga and County of San Bernardino requirements.
Public Services and Utilities: The ability of existing public services and
infrastructure to support development and increased demand will be assessed in the
environmental document.
• Growth Inducing Impacts: The potential for growth inducing impacts will be
evaluated in accordance with local and regional projections.
The RBF project team will play in integral role in the project review process and will
participate in meetings with staff and public hearings, as required by the City. The
environmental review process will result in the presentation of pertinent information
associated with project impacts and findings to the City decision makers for determination
and CEQA approval.
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 3 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
11. SCOPE OF WORK
The following Scope of Work has been prepared based upon information received from the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. The cost estimate, which is itemized according to task and issue, is included
in Section VII. As stated previously, this proposal provides for an Initial Study, followed by
alternative scenarios for either an MND or an EIR.
1.0 PROJECT SLOPING
1.1 PROJECT KICK-OFF AND PROJECT
CHARACTERISTICS
The work program will be initiated with a formal kick-off meeting with City Staff to
discuss the project features in greater detail. This initial meeting is vital to the
success of the CEQA process and will be a key milestone in order to confirm the
parameters of the analysis, project construction program assumptions, proposed
buildout conditions, scheduling and overall communications. Prior to the kick-off,
RBF will distribute akick-off meeting agenda and detailed memorandum, which will
identify information needs. Based upon the detailed project information obtained at
the project kick-off, RBF will draft a preliminary project description for review and
approval by City Staff.
1.2 RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION
RBF will obtain and review available referenced data for the project area, including
policy documentation from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State and Federal agencies, the Southern California Association of
Governments and all other agencies which may be affected by the project. This
information, along with environmental data and information available from the City
and other nearbyjurisdictions, will become part of the foundation of the subsequent
environmental document and will be reviewed and incorporated into the analysis, as
deemed appropriate.
1.3 AGENCY CONSULTATION
As indicated in Section 15083 of CEQA, many public agencies have found that early
consultation solves many potential conflicts that could arise in more serious forms
later in the review process. Although the NOP will provide that opportunity, RBF will
conduct additional discussions with focal, state and federal agencies which will
assist in the early stages of the analysis and issue delineation. This scoping can be
an effective way to bring together and resolve the concerns of affected Federal,
State and local agencies as well as the local community.
P122
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 4 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
1.4 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE
As a part of the early scoping for the project, the RBF Team will conduct a field
study of the site, review existing land use and environmental conditions and conduct
a detailed photographic recording of on-site and surrounding uses.
1.5 PREPARATION OF THE INITIAL STUDY
RBF will prepare the Initial Study for the proposed project. The Initial Study will
describe the project, the project location, and a description of the environmental
setting of the proposed project site. The main body of the document will consist of a
City-approved environmental checklist and an accompanying environmental
analysis.
The project will be analyzed for its potential to create significant environmental
impacts in the areas specified on the City's approved environmental checklist. The
Initial Study will also include mandatory findings of significance regarding impacts
upon cultural resources, biological resources, cumulative impacts, and direct and
indirect impacts upon human beings.
1.6 INITIAL STUDY DETERMINATION
This section will denote the appropriate CEQA action based upon the Environmental
Checklist/Environmental Analysis. The RBF Project Management Team will meet
with City Staff to review the analysis, findings, and advise on the recommendation of
preparing either an MND or EIR. Section 2.0, Alternative 1 -Preparation of an
MND, and Section 3.0, Alternative 2 -Preparation of an EIR, which follow, provide
detailed scopes for the preparation of either document. As directed by the City, RBF
will proceed with the preparation of compliance documentation in accordance with
the scope of work presented in this proposal.
1.7 DELIVERABLES
Twenty (20) copies of the Initial Study
One (1) camera ready copy of the Initial Study
One (1) electronic copy of the Initial Study
2.0 ALTERNATIVE 1 -PREPARATION OF AN MND
2.1 PREPARATION OF A SCREENCHECK DRAFT MND
2.1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The Environmental Analysis section will provide supporting information for the
conclusions rendered in the Environmental Checklist. The MND will analyze all
impact categories as mandated by the CEQA Guidelines.
P123
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 5 • February 19, 2008
^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
Aesthetics -The MND will evaluate the project's potential aesthetic impacts,
focusing on temporary construction-related disturbances and the development of
239,370 square feet of business park use. Mitigation measures will be provided, as
necessary, to minimize impacts to less than significant levels.
Agricultural Resources -The MND will evaluate the project's potential impacts to
Agricultural Resources from the loss of grapevine fields. To minimize impacts to
less than significant levels, mitigation measures will be provided, as necessary.
Air Quality -RBF will quantify project emissions in accordance with SCAQMD
methodology, utilizing required modeling software. This task shall include a
description of existing conditions, analysis of construction- and operation- related
impacts, and an analysis of consistency with localized significance thresholds. In
addition, RBF will also qualitatively address global warming issues as they pertain to
the global climate change initiative (Assembly Bill 32).
Biological Resources -Impacts to Biological Resources are not anticipated.
However, RBF will utilize existing documentation, including the City's General Plan
and General Plan EIR, to confirm existing conditions and provide an impact analysis
in this regard.
Cultural Resources-RBF will provide a description of existing conditions in regards
to cultural resources, including archeological, historical, and paleontological
resources, utilizing the prepared Cultural Resources Assessment and existing
documentation.
Geology and Soils -The MND will examine the grading/excavation required for the
project, on-site/regional seismic conditions, and exposure of people/structures to
adverse seismic affects and soil characteristics (i.e., erosion, expansion, instability)
associated with project implementation.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials -RBF will prepare a Preliminary Hazardous
Materials Assessment to evaluate the potential for hazardous materials and
characterize the expected nature of hazardous materials that may be present. This
section will utilize the Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment to analyze
construction- and operational-related impacts. The MND will examine construction-
and operational- related impacts to surrounding uses.
Hydrology and Water Quality-RBF will utilize the prepared Hydrology and Drainage
Study in addition to existing information and documentation to perform analysis of
the project's potential impacts. Analysis will review the project's affects on drainage
and water quality for both the construction process and during long-term operation.
RBF will utilize the Hydrology and Drainage Study as the basis for the Hydrology
and Water Quality section of the MND.
Land Use and Plannino -The MND will analyze the project's consistency with the
City's General Plan and Zoning Code. This section will also examine the project's
compatibility with existing surrounding land uses in the site vicinity.
P124
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 6 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
Mineral Resources -The MND will analyze and examine the project's potential to
impact the City's mineral resources.
Noise -The MND analysis will focus on short-term construction noise and overall
changes in ambient noise levels associated during construction of the project. The
analysis will discuss the acoustical effects on surrounding sensitive receptors during
short-term construction and long-term operations.
Population and Housino -The MND will analyze the project's potential for growth
inducement and the possibility for the project to displace housing or people.
Public Services -Impacts to Public Services are not anticipated. However, the
MND will confirm existing conditions and provide impact analysis in this regard.
Recreation -Impacts to Recreation are not anticipated. However, the MND will
confirm existing conditions and provide impact analysis in this regard.
Transportation and Traffic -The MND will examine the project's potential
construction-related impacts due to the ingress/egress of construction workers,
heavy trucks, and other construction equipment. In addition, RBF will analyze the
project's potential operational impacts due to the construction of a business park.
Utilities and Service Systems -RBF will analyze potential impacts to existing utilities
and service systems with the implementation of the proposed project. The ability of
existing infrastructure to support the proposed project will be evaluated in terms of
increased demand for utility service, such as water, electricity, gas, and wastewater.
2.1.2 GRAPHIC EXHIBITS
The environmental document will include a maximum of five (5) exhibits to enhance
the written text and clarify the project and potential environmental impacts. Exhibits
are anticipated to include: Regional Vicinity Map, Site Vicinity Map, and Site Plan
Map.
2.1.3 SCREENCHECK DRAFT MND
RBF will submit five (5) copies of the Screencheck Draft MND for review and
comment by the City. This scope of work assumes that any revisions desired by the
City will be consolidated into one complete set of comments. RBF will incorporate
comments from the City and submit one (1) "final check copy' of the final draft
document for review and comment by the City. RBF will incorporate one additional
complete set of comments received from the City. Should additional copies be
required, additional copies will be provided by RBF at an additional fee.
2.2 DRAFT MND
RBF will develop a distribution list (previous commenting agencies/parties,
responsible public agencies, trustee agencies, and interested parties) and distribute
P125
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 7 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
up to fifty (50) copies of the Draft MND for public review. RBF will also post the
Notice of Availability for the Draft MND at the County Clerk's office and send copies
of the document to the State Clearinghouse. This scope of work assumes that the
City will perform any radius mailing/newspaper ad posting for the project.
2.3 FINAL MND
The Final MND shall be composed of the Response to Comments and the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program. RBF will submit ten (10) copies and one (1)
camera-ready copy of the Final MND to the City
2.3.1 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
RBF will prepare responses to public comments received during the public review
period. In addition, RBF will prepare the errata for any changes to the Draft MND
text. This task is limited to a maximum of 30 hours.
2.3.2 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
To comply with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 (AB 3180), RBF will
prepare a Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program that will be submitted to the City for
review and comment. RBF will respond to one complete set of City comments on the
Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program. The Mitigation Monitoring Program will be
defined through working with staff to identify appropriate monitoring steps and
procedures in order to provide a basis for monitoring such measures during and
upon project implementation. RBF will provide one camera-ready copy of the
finalized Mitigation Monitoring Program.
2.4 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
RBF will prepare the Notice of Determination (NOD) for the proposed project and file
it with the California State Clearinghouse and the County Cierk. This scope of work
assumes that the City will be responsible for the California Department of Fish and
Game (CDFG) NOD filing fee, if applicable.
2.5 MEETINGS AND COORDINATION
Mr. Glenn Lajoie, AICP, and Mr. Alan Ashimine will be responsible for quality
control, oversight of the analysis, and the management and supervision of the
Environmental Review as well as consultation with the City. Mr. Lajoie and/or Mr.
Ashimine will undertake consultation and coordination of the project and review the
Environmental Studies for compliance with CEQA requirements. RBF will attend
project meetings, will represent the City at public hearings, and make presentations
at these meetings if necessary. This task assumes attendance at two (2) project
meetings with City staff (including the kick-off meeting) and one (1) public meeting
P126
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 8 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSl1 LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
forthe project hearing. Additional meetings shall be billed on a Time and Materials
basis.
2.6 DELIVERABLES
• Five (5) copies of the Screencheck Draft MND
One (1) electronic copy of the Screencheck Draft MND
• One (1) "final check copy" of the Screencheck Draft MND
Fifty (50) copies of the Draft MND
• One (1) camera ready copy of the Draft MND
• One (1) electronic copy of the Draft MND
• Five (5) copies of the Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program
• Five (5) copies of the Draft Response to Comments
Ten (10) copies of the Finai MND
• One (1) camera ready copy of the Final MND
One (1) electronic copy of the Final MND
3.0 ALTERNATIVE 2 -PREPARATION OF AN EIR
3.7 NOTICE OF PREPARATION
RBF will prepare, distribute, and file the NOP for the EIR. A Draft NOP will be
prepared and forwarded to City Staff for review and comment. RBF will then finalize
the NOP for distribution. The distribution will be based on aCity-approved
distribution list of affected agencies and interested parties, to be prepared by RBF in
conjunction with City staff. This task includes certified mailing to a maximum of fifty
addresses. This task includes either radius mailings or a newspaper notice.
3.2 SLOPING MEETING
A public scoping meeting, which can also involve federal, state or other local
agencies, will be set up as a brief project overview presentation, so that the
community can gain an understanding ofthe proposed project and make comments
based upon accurate knowledge of the proposed project. The scoping meeting will
emphasize the review process and will be presented so that the community can gain
a greater understanding of the proposed project, as well as the intent and
requirements of CEQA. RBF will provide handouts and up to two presentation-size
graphics to supplement the discussion. Following the presentation, the meeting will
be devoted to public participation, questions and comments. Written comment
forms will be provided for this purpose, and these comments, along with verbal
comments, will become a part of the administrative record.
P127
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 9 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
3.3 PREPARATION OF SCREENCHECK EIR
3.3.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The Introduction will cite the provisions of CEQA and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga CEQA Implementation procedures for which the proposed project is
subject to. This section will identify the purpose of the study and statutory authority
as well document scoping procedures, summary of the EIR format, listing of
responsible and trustee agencies and documentation incorporated by reference.
3.3.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Executive Summary will include a Project Summary, an overview of project
impacts, mitigation and levels of significance after mitigation, summary of project
alternatives and areas of controversy and issues to be resolved. The Environmental
Summary will be presented in a columnar format.
3.3.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project Description section of this EIR will detail the project location,
background and history of the project, discretionary actions, characteristics, goals
and objectives, construction program, phasing, agreements, and permits and
approvals that are required based on available information. This section will include
a summary of the local environmental setting for the project. Exhibits depicting the
regional and site vicinity will be included in this section. Applicant prepared plan
information and an aerial photograph are to be included within the Project
Description.
3.3.4 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
This section will provide a comprehensive description of thresholds of significance
for each issue area of the environmental analysis. The significance threshold
criteria will be described and will provide the basis for conclusions of significance.
Primary sources to be used in identifying the criteria include the CEQA Guidelines,
local, State, Federal or other standards applicable to an impact category.
3.3.5 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TO BE
In accordance with Section 15130 of CEQA, this section provides a detailed listing
of cumulative projects and actions under consideration for the analysis. As stated in
Task 3.1.9, Cumulative Impacts, the likelihood of occurrence and level of severity
will be studied. The purpose of this section is to present a listing and description of
projects, past, present and anticipated in the reasonably foreseeable future, even if
those projects are outside of the jurisdiction of Rancho Cucamonga. The potential
for impact and levels of significance are contingent upon the radius or area of
interaction with the project area. RBF will consult with City staff and other applicable
local jurisdictions to define the appropriate study area for the cumulative analysis, as
described in Task 3.1.9.
P128
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 10 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
3.3.6 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
RBF will evaluate the necessary information with respect to the existing conditions,
the potential adverse effects of project implementation (both individual and
cumulative), and measures to mitigate such effects. Environmental issues raised
during the scoping process (NOP responses, and any other relevant and valid
informative sources) will also be evaluated. The analyses will be based upon all
available data, results from additional research, and an assessment of existing
technical data. These analyses will be performed by qualified Environmental
Analysts, CEQA Experts, and Planners at RBF.
The Environmental Analysis section of the EIR will thoroughly discuss the existing
conditions for each environmental issue area, identify short-term construction and
long-term environmental impacts associated with the project and their levels of
significance. The impact analysis will be in a consistent order of environmental
factors as Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (Aesthetics, Agricultural, Air Quality,
etc.). The thresholds for significance shall be identified for every environmental
issue. A discussion will be provided for all environmental issues determined to be
No Impact or Less Than Significant Impact, explaining why these determinations
were made and that no further analysis in the EIR is warranted. The Impact
Subsection will provide a detailed analysis of each issue determined to be Less
Than Significant With Mitigation incorporated or Potentially Significant Impact. For
each environmental issue requiring EIR analysis, the EIR will state the level of
significance and then provide the analysis discussion, mitigation measures specific
to this environmental issue, and level of significance after mitigation for that
environmental issue. This section will include analysis for the following
environmental issue areas:
A. Aesthetics, Light, and Glare
The issue of aesthetics is in some ways a subjective consideration. What is
visually offensive to some may not be of great concern to others.
Nevertheless, the issue does require review, based upon the criteria set
forth in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines and input received at the public
scoping meeting for the EIR. The evaluation for this project will be based
upon a review of plan information and on-site reconnaissance.
RBF will characterize the existing aesthetic environment and visual
resources, including a discussion of views within the site and views from
surrounding areas to the site, particularly from the adjacent uses. Project
construction impacts will be addressed based on the site's aesthetic
changes visible from surrounding roadways and locations. RBF will evaluate
available architectural and design standards for the project. Mitigation
measures such as perimeter landscaping, building design, articulation,
screening, and setbacks may be recommended to reduce the significance of
potential visual impacts. Color site photographs will be provided which will
show on-site and surrounding views. This section will analyze potential view
impairments (if any) to adjacent uses as a result of project implementation.
The compatibility of the project's architectural features, height and building
P129
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 11 February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
materials with the on-site uses and the surrounding area will be reviewed.
RBF will also address potentially significant impacts generated by the
introduction of light and glare from of the proposed project. This analysis will
discuss light and glare impacts (from streetlights, vehicle headlights, building
lights, etc.) on neighboring sensitive uses. RBF will review and incorporate
existing City policies and guidelines regarding light and glare for inclusion
within the EIR. RBF will recommend mitigation measures to reduce potential
aesthetic and light and glare impacts to the maximum extent possible.
B. Air Quality
RBF's Air Quality Specialists will evaluate project-related air pollutant
emissions on both ashort-term and long-term basis and prepare an Air
Quality Study. The Air Quality Study will include the following which will be
incorporated into the EIR:
Existing Conditions. The project site is located within the jurisdiction of the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). RBFwill describe
the meteorological conditions and discuss ambient air monitoring data
collected for the nearest monitoring station. A description of the regulatory
framework relating to air quality (i.e., California Clean Air Act, Air Quality
Management Plan, etc.) will also be provided.
Construction-Related Emissions. Equipment exhaust and fugitive dust
emissions resulting from construction activities will be quantified using
URBEMIS2007. Based on landform/grading/demolition/excavation data and
assumptions provided by the project Applicant (i.e., number/type of
equipment needed for grading activities, project phasing, etc.), the analysis
will estimate equipment exhaust emissions utilizing the latest emission
factors as prescribed by the EMFAC2007 and' OFFROADS2007 models.
Emissions from soil hauling activities will also be quantified, if necessary.
Fugitive dust emissions will be quantified based upon the area to be graded
per day. Construction pollutant emissions will be compared to SCAQMD
thresholds and mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce the
significance of emissions, where feasible. Construction related Localized
Significance Thresholds will be analyzed and discussed. RBF will also
qualitatively discuss naturally occurring asbestos impacts as they relate to
the proposed construction activities.
Long-Term Emissions. RBF will quantify vehicular and area source
emissions then provide a comparison to the SCAQMD thresholds of
significance. The emissions will be quantitatively derived utilizing the
EMFAC2007 and URBEMIS2007 models. Project consistency with regional
air quality plans will be evaluated. RBF will address cumulative air quality
impacts based upon a list of cumulative projects supplied by the City.
Should project traffic warrant Carbon Monoxide Hotspot modeling, RBF will
model intersections utilizing the BREEZE ROADS model. The analysis will
be consistent with the Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide
P130
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 12 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CO NSLJ LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
Protocol, prepared by the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University
of California, Davis.
Currently no guidelines on how to approach the preparation of a Global
Climate Change Impact Analysis. Additionally, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), California Air Resources Board (GARB), or the
SCAQMD have not developed significance thresholds for climate change. In
the absence of such guidance, the analysis will assess the Greenhouse
Gases (GHGs) produced by the proposed project. As there is no
significance threshold set for GHG emissions, this report will not address
significance issues; rather it will be intended to inform the public of the
GHGs emitted. RBF will describe the regulatory status of climate change
legislation in the United States and California. RBF will draft a short section
describing the status of regulatory development of AB-32 (Global Warming
Solutions Act), with an emphasis on the preliminary nature of the legislation.
In addition, this section will briefly describe the current state of Federal
legislation, including a discussion ofwhether such legislation is likely to pre-
empt the current California legislation. Note that this scope explicitly
excludes RBF from developing Global Climate Change thresholds or
emissions inventories for the City.
C. Cultural Resources
This section will incorporate the results of the Cultural Resources
Assessment to be provided by the City. The EIR will utilize the Assessment
regarding archaeological, paleontological, and historical resources to provide
a description of existing conditions, potential impacts, and recommend
appropriate mitigation measures, if necessary. RBF will evaluate potential
cultural impacts of the proposed project, include a discussion regarding
existing conditions and historical use of the project site, and incorporate the
Cultural Resources Assessment conclusions into the EIR section.
D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
RBF will prepare a Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessmentto evaluate
the existing conditions of the project. The objectives of the Preliminary
Hazardous Materials Assessment is to: (1) evaluate the potential for
hazardous materials on the site based upon readily discernible and/or
documented present and historic on-site uses and uses immediately
adjacent to the site, and (2) generally characterize the expected nature of
hazardous materials that may be present as a result of such uses, within the
limits imposed by the scope of the Assessment. Materials that may
constitute a hazardous waste include, but are not limited to petroleum
products, pesticides, organic compounds, heavy metals, or other
compounds injurious to human health and the environment.
The Assessment is designed to document past activities, facilities, or waste
disposal practices, which may have resulted in soil or groundwater
contamination. Past site usage will be investigated through an aerial
P131
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 13 • February 19, 2008
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
CONSULTING
photograph review, interviews, review of former permits, review of
documents on City file, and a research of former citations from state and
local agencies. Current site conditions will be documented by an on-site
inspection of the project area.
RBF will utilize the Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment and
analyze the potential impacts of .the proposed project. The potential for
hazardous materials to exist on-site due to historical uses will be analyzed,
impacts will be discussed for both construction and long-term operation of
the project, and mitigation measures will be recommend as necessary.
E. Hydrology and Water IRuallty
RBF will perform a peer review of the Hydrology and Drainage Study to be
provided by the City for the Biane Business Park Project. RBF will review
the report to ensure that it contains a review of existing documentation,
watershed boundary delineation, existing conditions analysis, analysis of
proposed hydrology, analysis of proposed drainage facilities, and proposed
water quality features. The review will also assess preliminary design
assumptions. The Hydrology and Drainage Study will be reviewed to assure
that it conforms to City and/or County of San Bernardino master plans of
drainage and design standards. RBF will include two reviews of the
Hydrology and Drainage Study and two comment memorandums based on
the review. Additional reviews could be accomplished on a Time and
Materials basis.
The EIR section will incorporate existing hydrology and drainage data forthe
project area to identify any existing localized drainage issues. The EIR
section will incorporate a review of existing documentation, watershed
boundary delineation, existing conditions analysis, analysis of proposed
hydrology, analysis of proposed drainage facilities, and assessment/sizing of
stormwater detention facilities, identify drainage patterns, storm drain
improvements, and downstream affects. RBF will also evaluate water
quality conditions and identify water quality techniques/structures that may
be set forth by the County or State and Federal regulations. The potential
for the project to degrade water quality, interfere with groundwater recharge
or expose people to water related hazards will be identified.
F. Land Use and Planning
RBF will evaluate the proposed project in consideration of on-site and
surrounding land uses and will analyze the relationship of the project to
applicable planning policies. These policies will be identifed from the
General Plan, Zoning Code, and other City standards. Existing land uses in
the project area will be identifed based on information compiled as a part of
the EIR. Impacts to existing and potential future land uses in the project
area will be assessed for both construction and operational phases. RBF
will identify possible impact to nearby residences, businesses and other
uses.
P132
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 14 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
G. Noise
RBF's Noise Specialists will prepare a Noise Study to evaluate project-
related noise impacts specifically focusing on short-term construction
impacts. The Noise Study will include the following which will be
incorporated into the EIR:
Existing Conditions. RBF will review applicable State and City noise and
land use compatibility criteria for the project area. Noise standards
regulating noise impacts in the noise standards for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will be discussed for land uses on and adjacent to the project
sites. RBF will conduct a site visit along the project sites and at adjacent
land uses. During the site visit, RBF will conduct short-term noise level
measurements along the project area. Noise monitoring equipment will
consist of a BrOeI & Kj~r model 2250 sound level meter (SLM) equipped
with Briiel & Kja:r pre-polarized freefield microphone. The results of the
noise measurements will be post-processed and graphically illustrated with
the BrOel & Kj~r Noise Explorer software. The noise monitoring survey will
be conducted at up to five separate locations to establish baseline noise
levels in the project area. Noise recording lengths are anticipated to require
approximately 10 minutes at each location. The noise measurements will
evaluate noise exposure due to traffic while accounting for local topography,
shielding from existing structures, and variations in travel speed.
Construction-related Noise. Construction would occur during
implementation of the proposed project. Noise impacts from construction
sources will be analyzed based on the equipment, length of a specific
construction task, equipment power type (gasoline or diesel engine),
horsepower, load factor, and percentage of time in use. The construction
noise impacts will be evaluated in terms of maximum levels (Lmax) and
hourly equivalent continuous noise levels (Leg) and the frequency of
occurrence at adjacent sensitive locations. Analysis requirements will be
based on the sensitivity of the area and the Noise Ordinance specifications
of the City. RBF will provide adiscussion ofoff-site truck hauling, if required,
for construction-related soil import or export, focusing on haul routes
affecting sensitive receptors.
A technical discussion of construction activity-related vibration will be
provided. The analysis will be based upon the guidance and thresholds
issued by the Federal Transit Administration publication titled Transit Noise
and Vibration Impacts Assessment, May 2006. This is the industry
accepted methodology for assessing construction related vibration impacts.
Aground-borne vibration level of 0.2 inch-per-second peak particle velocity
(PPV) will be considered as damage threshold criterion for structures
deemed "fragile," and aground-borne vibration level of 0.12 inch-per-second
PPV will be considered as damage criterion for structures deemed
"extremely fragile," such as historic buildings. With respect to structures that
are considered "well engineered," aground-borne vibration damage
P133
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 15 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
threshold criterion of 2.0 inch-per-second PPV will be used. Note that this
task excludes performing vibration measurements on-site.
Stationary Noise Sources. Potential effects of existing off-site noise sources
will be evaluated based on the City's land use compatibility standards.
Compliance with applicable noise standards will be evaluated, with
recommended mitigation measures included where appropriate.
Transportation Noise. The proposed project is anticipated to generate new
vehicular traffic trips from future growth. On-site and off-site noise impacts
from vehicular traffic will be assessed using the U.S. Federal Highway Traffic
Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108). The analysis will focus on noise
impacts associated with the development of the proposed project. Model
input data will include average daily traffic volumes, day/night percentages of
autos, medium and heavy trucks, vehicle speeds, ground attenuation
factors, and roadway widths. The 24-hour weighted Community Noise
Equivalent Levels (CNEL) will be presented in a tabular format. Traffic
parameters necessary for the model input will be obtained from the traffic
study. This scope assumes that architectural mitigation will not be developed
(i.e., window glazing specifications, soundwall design, etc.).
H. Transportation and Traffic
RBF's Transportation and Traffic Specialists will prepare a Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) to evaluate project-related traffic impacts. The TIA will be
prepared in accordance with the Guidelines forCMP Traffic ImpactAnalysis
Reports in San Bernardino County (Congestion Management Program for
San Bernardino County, San Bernardino Associated Governments,
November 2, 2005).The TIA will include the following which will be
incorporated into the EIR:
Study Conditions: The traffic analysis will identify traffic impacts under the
following scenarios: Existing Conditions; Forecast Near-Term Year Without
Project Conditions; and Forecast Near-Term Year With Project Conditions.
Congestion Management Program analysis scenarios are included to
address potential long-range impacts consistent with San Bernardino
Associated Governments (SANBAG) CMP traffic studies guidelines.
Study Area: RBF will count and analyze up to twelve (12) study
intersections during the a.m. peak period (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.) and the
p.m. peak period (4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) on a typical weekday (Tuesday,
Wednesday, or Thursday). Additionally, RBF will collect 24-hour roadway
count data at up to eight (8) study roadway segments on a typical weekday
(Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday). In accordance with SANBAG CMP
guidelines the intersection count data will include vehicle classification
information at six of the twelve study intersections. If additional counts are
required beyond the number assumed, the counts can be performed on a
Time and Materials basis.
P134
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 16 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CCNSUITING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
RBF will visit the study area to document existing conditions including
intersection control, traffic signal phasing, roadway cross-section, speed
limits, parking restrictions, intersection approach lanes, etc. The traffic
analysis will include graphics documenting the existing intersection roadway
geometry, and the analysis will utilize existing conditions to establish a
baseline for current operations.
Forecast Near-Term Year Traffic Volumes: Forecast future opening year
traffic volumes will be based on either specific cumulative projects traffic
data supplied by the City, and/or by applying an annual traffic growth rate
provided by the City to adjust existing traffic volumes to the designated
future horizon year.
RBF will derive trip distribution and assignment at up to ten (10)
approved/pending projects identified by City Staff. Forecast near-term year
with project volumes will be derived by adding the forecast project trip
assignment to the forecast near-term year without project volumes.
Proposed Proiect Trip Generation Trip Distribution & Assionment The
study will identify the number of daily and peak hour trips forecast to be
generated by the proposed project, using trip generation rates contained in
Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 7'h Edition, 2003) or
other source as directed by the City. RBF will perform 24-hour driveway
count data at up to six (6) driveways at the existing winery site to identify
existing trip generation displaced by the proposed project. Assumptions
regarding project trip generation will be reviewed and approved by City staff
prior to inclusion in the traffic study. The traffic study will provide a forecast
distribution of project-generated trips. Manual trip distribution and
assignment will be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to utilization in
the study
Level of Service: The forecast traffic impacts of the project during peak
hours at the study intersections will be assessed. Operation of the study
intersections will be documented to identify project-related traffic impacts
using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology. Traffix
software will be utilized for preparation of the level of service analysis.
Mitigation measures will be recommended, as necessary, in accordance with
applicable agency performance criteria. The TIA will document forecast
operating conditions after application of any recommended mitigation
measures.
Traffic Signal Warrants: Traffic signal warrants will be prepared at up to two
(2) unsignalized study intersections in accordance with the California
MUTCD (FHWA MUTCD 2003 Revision 1J methodology. If applicable,
existing conditions traffic signal warrants will be prepared using peak hour
and daily traffic volume data for the applicable eight California MUTCD
signal warrants, and future traffic signal warrants will be prepared using
P135
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 17 • February 19, 2008
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
^ ^ ^
CONSLI LTING
estimated average daily traffic applied to the California MUTCD Table
4C.103(CA).
State Highwav Analvsis: The State of California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies
guide requires review of substantial individual projects, which might on their
own impact the State Highway transportation system. RBF assumes the
project trip generation and distribution does not exceed Caltrans-established
trip volume thresholds. Therefore, no State Highway analysis is included in
this scope of work.
San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program Analvsis: The
purpose of the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program
(CMP) is to develop a coordinated approach to managing and decreasing
traffic congestion by linking the various transportation, land use and air
quality planning programs throughout the County. The program is consistent
with that of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).
The CMP requires review of substantial individual projects, which might on
their own impact the CMP transportation system.
When accounting for passenger car equivalents, the proposed industrial
project is forecast to generate in excess of 250 two-way a.m. peak hour trips
and in excess of 250 two-way p.m. peak hour trips. Therefore, preparation
of a SANBAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) TIA is required for
the proposed project according to CMP TIA guidelines. This scope of work
assumes the CMP analysis study area will include up to six (6) CMP
intersections to satisfy the San Bernardino CMP.
RBF will work with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff and SANBAG staff to
post-process currently available traffic model run data for forecast year 2025
conditions. Since the SANBAG traffic model does not generate peak hour
intersection movement data at the study intersections, RBF will post-process
the year 2025 mid-block peak period traffic volumes to derive a.m. and p.m.
peak hour turning movement counts at up to six (6) study intersections for
forecast year 2030 without project conditions in accordance with SANBAG-
established criteria correlated to existing intersection approach traffic
volumes, including pro-ration of incremental traffic growth to derive forecast
year 2030 volumes from SANBAG provided year 2025 volumes. This scope
of work does not assume costs associated with running new model runs.
The CMP analysis will document existing operation of the study
intersections, and determine future opening year and year 2030 operation of
the study facilities both with and without the proposed project to identify
project-related traffic impacts using the HCM analysis methodology.
Mitigation measures will be recommended, as necessary, in accordance with
San Bernardino County CMP performance criteria.
P136
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 18 • February 19, 2008
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
^ ^ ^
CONSULTING ,
1. Public Services and Utilities
RBF will contact potentially affected agencies to identify relevant existing
conditions, project impacts, and recommended mitigation measures. The
discussion will focus on the potential alteration of existing facilities,
extension or expansion of new facilities, and the increased demand on
services based on the proposed land uses. RBF will evaluate the ability of
the project area to receive adequate service based on City and applicable
County standards and, where adequate services are not available, will
identify the effects of inadequate service and recommended mitigation
measures.
3.3.7 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT
RBF will provide a qualitative explanation of issues found not to be significant in the
Initial Study, and which were not discussed in detail in the EIR. The Initial Study will
be provided as an attachment to the EIR for the reader's reference.
3.3.8 GROYYTH INDUCEMENT
RBF will provide a project specific analysis update of potential growth-inducing
impacts pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(8). The analysis in this
section was based on data from the City of Rancho Cucamogna, California
Department of Finance, and U.S. Census. This section will discuss ways in which
the proposed project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction
of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment.
The analysis addresses growth-inducing impacts in terms of whether the project
influences the rate, location, and the amount of growth. Growth-inducing impacts
are assessed based on the project's consistency with adopted/proposed plans that
have addressed growth management from a local and regional standpoint. Potential
growth-inducing impacts from the proposed development will be analyzed as they
relate to population, housing and employment factors.
3.3.9 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15130, RBF will discuss cumulative
impacts for each environmental issue area identified above, focusing on cumulative
impacts and levels of severity in the project area at a quantitative and qualitative
level. The analysis will include potential future development in the project area. The
analysis will focus upon cumulative impacts from recently approved and/or pending
projects in proximity (cumulative project information to be provided as stated in Task
3.1.5).
3.3.10 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, RBF will provide an analysis of a
"reasonable range" of alternatives (for budgeting purposes, RBF assumes four
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 19 • February 19, 2008
P137
^ ^ ^ ^
CGNSIJ LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
alternatives), comparing environmental impacts of each alternative in each impact
area to the project. For each alternative, RBF will provide an analysis of impacts to
environmental resources. RBF will prepare a detailed quantitative review of one of
the alternatives, which is assumed to involve adesign/density modification. One
important element of the Alternatives section will be an impact matrix which will offer
a comparison of the varying levels of impact of each alternative being analyzed.
This matrix will be prepared in a format to allow decision-makers a reference that
will be easily understood, while providing a calculated (where feasible), accurate
comparison of each alternative.
The alternatives section will conform to both amendments to Section 15126.6 of the
State CEQA Guidelines and to recent and applicable court cases. RBF will discuss
as required by the State CEQA Guidelines, the advantages and disadvantages of
each alternative and the reasons for rejecting or recommending the project
alternatives stated. This alternatives section will culminate with the selection of the
environmentally superior alternative in accordance with CEQA requirements.
3.3.11 ADDITIONAL SECTIONS
RBF will provide additional sections in the EIR to meet CEQA and City requirements
including the following:
the Proposed Action Should It Be Implemented. Changes in the
environment and uses on non-renewable resources which will occur as a
result of the proposed project which can be considered irreversible or
irretrievable will be evaluated and discussed within this section of the EIR.
Inventory of Mitigation Measures. This section will be a comprehensive list
of mitigation measures for the proposed project. To allow direct
incorporation of mitigation measures into Conditions of Approval, RBF will
provide a summary of mitigation measures, which will be numbered
consecutively.
• InventoN of Unavoidable Adverse Impacts. This section will be a
comprehensive list of unavoidable adverse impacts associated with the
proposed project.
• Organizations and Persons Consulted/Bibliography. Any federal, state or
local agencies, other organizations and private individuals consulted in
preparing the EIR will be listed in this section. RBF will provide a complete
list of reference materials used in preparation of the EIR.
3.3.12 GRAPHIC EXHIBITS
The EIR will include a maximum of 25 exhibits to enhance the written text and clarify
the proposed project environmental impacts. Using state-of-the-art computerdesign
equipment and techniques, our in-house graphic design team will create
P138
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 20 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
~_ CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
professional quality, black and white or full color exhibits, dividers and covers for the
EIR and Appendices. Graphics will be in GIS or a GIS compatible format. This
Task assumes camera-ready base maps are provided. All exhibits will be 8Yz" x 11"
in size.
3.4 DRAFT EIR
3.4.1 PRELIMINARY DRAFT EIR
RBF will respond to one complete set of comments on the Preliminary Draft EIR. If
desired, RBF will provide the Preliminary Draft of the EIR with all changes
highlighted to assist the final check of the document.
3.4.2 COMPLETION OF THE DRAFT EIR
RBF will respond to a second review of the Preliminary Draft EIR and will prepare
the report forthe required 45-day public review period. In addition, RBF will prepare
the Notice of Completion (NOC) for submittal to the Office of Planning and Research
(OPR). RBF will also work with the City to develop a distribution listing for the NOC
and Draft EIR.
3.5 FINAL EIR
The Final EIR will consist ofthe revised Draft EIR text, as necessary, the Response
to Comments, the Mitigation Monitoring Program, and the Findings and Statement of
Overriding Consideratioris. The Draft EIR will be revised in accordance with the
responses to public comments on the EIR. To facilitate review, RBF will format the
Final EIR with shaded text for any new or modifed text, and "strike out" any text
which has been deleted from the Final EIR. RBF will also prepare and file the
Notice of Determination (NOD) within five (5) days of EIR approval. This scope of
work assumes that the City will be responsible for any filing fees associated with the
NOD (e.g., California Department of Fish and Game filing fee).
3.5.1 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
RBF will respond to comments received on the Draft EIR during the 45-day public
review period, based upon the budget allocation referenced in Section VII, Budget.
RBF will prepare thorough, reasoned and sensitive responses to relevant
environmental issues. This task includes written responses to both written and oral
comments received on the Draft EIR (includes review of hearing transcripts, as
required). The Draft Responses to Comments will be prepared for review.
Following review of the Draft Responses to Comments, RBF will finalize this section
for inclusion in the Final EIR.
P139
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 21 February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
. CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
3.5.2 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
To comply with the Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 (AB 32180), RBF will
prepare a Mitigation Monitoring Program to be defined through working with City
staff to identify appropriate monitoring steps/procedures and in order to provide a
basis for monitoring such measures during and upon project implementation.
The Mitigation Monitoring Checklist will serve as the foundation of the Mitigation
Monitoring Program forthe proposed project. The Checklist indicates the mitigation
measure number as outlined in the EIR, the EIR reference page (where the
measure is documented), a list of Mitigation Measure/Conditions of Approval (in
chronological order under the appropriate topic), the Monitoring Milestone (at what
agency/department responsible for verifying implementation of the measure),
Method of Verification (documentation, field checks, etc.), and a verification section
for the initials of the verifying individual date of verification, and pertinent remarks.
3.5.3 FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS
RBF will provide administrative assistance to facilitate the CEQA process including
the preparation of the NOD, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings
for City use in the project review process. RBF will prepare the Findings in
accordance with the provisions of Section 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA
Guidelines and in a form specified by the City. RBF will submit the Draft Findings
for City review and will respond to one set of City comments.
3.6 PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS
3.6.7 COORDINATION
Mr. Glenn Lajoie, AICP and Mr. Alan Ashimine, will be responsible for management
of the EIR preparation process as well as consultation with City staff to incorporate
City policies into the EIR. Mr. Lajoie and Mr. Ashimine will undertake consultation
and coordination of the project and review the EIR for compliance with CEQA
requirements and guidelines and City CEQA procedures. RBF will coordinate with
state and local agencies regarding this environmental document. Mr. Lajoie and Mr.
Ashimine, will coordinate with technical staff, support staff, and word processing
toward the timely completion of the EIR. It is the goal of RBF to serve as an
extension of City staff throughout the duration of the EIR process. As is stated in
Understanding of the Project, RBF will be available to meet with City staffto discuss
particular project parameters. In addition, RBF will provide monthly progress reports
for the City's review. Each progress report will include a summary of tasks
performed and the percentage of work completed to date according to individual
task.
P140
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 22 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
3.6.2 MEETINGS
Mr. Lajoie, and/or Mr. Ashimine, will attend all staff meetings and will represent the
Project Team at public hearings and make presentations as necessary. RBF
anticipates several meetings with City staff, including a "kick-off meeting" (refer to
Task 1.1 ), progress meetings, public meetings and hearings. Mr. Lajoie and Mr.
Ashimine along with other key Project Team personnel will also be available to
attend meetings with affected jurisdictions, agencies and organizations as needed to
identify issues, assess impacts and define mitigation. Should the City determine
that additional meetings beyond the following meetings are necessary, services will
be provided under a separate scope of work on a time and materials basis. The
estimated cost for additional meetings is approximately $800 per person.
• One kickoff meeting with City Staff (refer to Task 1.1)
• One public scooping meeting (refer to Task 3.2)
• Eight (8) meetings with City staff to discuss project details, resolve issues,
review comments on Screencheck/Preliminarydncuments and receive any
necessary direction
• Two public hearings with presentations as necessary. This includes one
Planning Commission hearing and one City Council hearing.
3.7 DELIVERABLES
3.7.1 NOP DISTRIBUTION
• Fifty (50) copies of the Notice of Preparation (NOP)
• One (1) camera ready copy of the NOP
• One (1) electronic copy of the NOP
3.7.2 PREPARATION OF SCREENCHECK DRAFT EIR
Five (5) copies of the Screencheck Draft EIR
Five (5) CD's containing the Screencheck Draft Technical
Appendices
One (1) electronic copy of the Screencheck Draft EIR and Exhibits
3.7.3 DRAFT EIR
Five (5) copies of the Preliminary Draft EIR
Five (5) CD's containing the Preliminary Draft Technical Appendices
One (1) electronic copy of the Preliminary Draft EIR and Exhibits
Fifty (50) copies of the Draft EIR
• Fifty (50) CD's containing the Draft EIR Technical Appendices
Fifty (50) copies of the Notice of Completion
Five (5) CD versions of the Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• One (1) camera-ready unbound original of the Draft EIR and
Technical Appendices
P141
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 23 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
C GNSLJ LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
• One (1) electronic copy of the Draft EIR and Appendices
3.7.4 FINAL EIR
Five (5) copies of the Draft Responses to Comments
One (1) electronic copy of the Response to Comments
Five (5) copies of the Screencheck Final EIR
Five (5) CD version of Screencheck Final EIR Technical Appendices
Forty (40) copies of the Final EIR, including exhibits and Technical
Appendices
• Forty (40) CD version of the Final EIR and Technical Appendices
• One (1) unbound camera-ready original of the Final EIR, Exhibits
and Technical Appendices
One (1) electronic copy of the Final EIR, including exhibits and
Technical Appendices
• Five (5) copies of the Draft Findings and Statement of Overriding
Considerations
• One (1) camera-ready Final Findings and Statement of Overriding
Considerations
One (1) electronic copy of the Final Findings and Statement of
Overriding Considerations
• One (1) camera-ready Notice of Determination
• One (1) camera-ready Notice of Completion
P142
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 24 • February 19, 2008
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
111. PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE
The following is a preliminary outline of the Project schedule. A date specific schedule will follow
the kickoff to the work program.
Project Kickoff Day 1
Project Description and Background Information Week 1
Preparation of the Initial Study Weeks 2-4
ALTERNATIVE 1 -PREPARATION OF AN MND
Preparation of Technical Reports Weeks 5-8
Screencheck Draft MND preparation Weeks 5-10
Review of Screencheck Draft MND Week 10-11
Complete, Publish, Circulate Draft MND Week 12
30-Day Public Review Period Weeks 13-16
RBF prepares the Final MND' Weeks 17-20
Review of Final MND Weeks 21-22
Complete, Publish, Circulate Final MND Week 23
Public Hearing TBD
ALTERNATIVE 2 -PREPARATION OF AN EIR
Preparation of Technical Reports Weeks 5-12
30-Day NOP Review Weeks 5-8
Screencheck Draft EIR preparation Weeks 5-15
Review of Screencheck Draft EIR Weeks 16-17
RBF Prepares Preliminary Draft EIR Weeks 18-19
Review of Preliminary Draft EIR Weeks 20-21
Complete, Publish, Circulate Draft EIR Week 22
45-Day Public Review Period Weeks 23-28
RBF Prepares Final EIRZ Weeks 28-31
Review of Final EIR Weeks 32-33
Complete, Publish, Circulate Final EIR Week 34
Certification Hearings TBD
~ The Response to Comments and the Mifiga6on Monitoring Program compose the Final MND
~ The Response to Comments, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and Findings and Statement of Ovemding Considerations compose the Final EIR.
P143
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 25 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSLJ LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
IV. SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS
RBF Consulting is amulti-disciplinary planning, engineering and surveying firm with a total staff of
over 1,000 professionals, with offices in Contra Costa, Marin, Santa Clara, Orange, Riverside, San
Bernardino, Ventura, Los Angeles, and San Diego counties. With over 60 years of public and
private sector experience, RBF is respected and recognized in the profession of consulting
planning, environmental, and engineering services throughout the state of California. RBF has in-
house expertise indisciplines including Environmental Analysis, Planning, GIS Services, Surveying,
Aerial Photogrammetry, Mapping, Real Estate Assessments, Transportation/Traffic Engineering,
Civil Engineering (including Grading, Public Works, Water/Wastewater, Hydrology), Mechanical/
Electrical/Energy Services, Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) and Media Services. Over
90 professionals are dedicated to Planning, Environmental Services and Landscape Architecture.
RBF possesses the full range of disciplines necessary to provide turn-key planning, design and
implementation of a wide range of projects. We combine our expertise in development projects and
urban planning, transportation and air quality management, to develop and assess project designs
that minimize impacts to the natural environment and community. The following is a comprehensive
list of RBF departments and services:
DEPARTMENTS AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Land Planning and Urban Conceptual Design; Master Planning; Site Planning; Hillside
Design: Grading; Landscape Architecture; Redevelopment and Infill Land
Use Planning; Illustrative Plans; Pedestrian and Vehicular Trail
Studies; Visual Analysis; Design Guidelines and Development
Standards.
Policy Planning: Specific Plans, General Plans; Community Participation Programs;
Project Management and Coordination; Feasibility/Special Studies;
Fee Programs; Entitlement to Use (including zone changes,
General Plan Amendments and annexation studies);
Redevelopment Studies; Consultant Coordination; Governmental
Agencies/Public Liaison; and Development Support Services
through Construction.
Environmental Services: Environmental Impact Reports/Statements; Expanded Initial
Studies/Negative Declarations; Mitigation Monitoring Programs;
Public Participation Programs; Natural Resource Management;
Resource Mitigation Permits; EIR and EIS Review; Noticing;
Statements of Overriding Considerations; Findings; and Special
Studies, such as Phase I Site Assessment for hazardous materials,
as well as noise and air quality monitoring and modeling.
Transportation Planning.• Master Plans of Circulation; Transportation Planning/Engineering;
Traffic Impact Studies; Traffic Control Plans; Traffic Signal
Coordination; Traffc Signal Design; Congestion Management
Programs; Street Lighting; Signing, Striping, and Construction
Detour Plans.
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 26 • February 19, 2008
P144
P145
^ ^ ^ ^
CO NSLJ LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
Media Services: Report Graphics; Presentation Graphics; View Analysis;
Illustrations; Slide Shows; Video Services; and CADD Illustrative
Plans.
Civil Engineering: Subdivision Engineering; Structural Engineering; Engineering
Design; and CADD mapping.
Mechanical/Electrical Commercial Office Buildings; Retail Shopping Center; Educational
Engineering: Facilities; Hotel/Motel; Industrial; Special Energy Systems;
Entertainment Performing Arts Centers; and Computer Centers.
RBF has experienced professionals in a wide range of planning, engineering and related
disciplines. With over 60 years of experience throughout California, our staff is actively involved in
professional and local issues through serving as local and state officers for various professional
organizations. We provide a full range of engineering and planning services, with particular
expertise in the planning, design and permitting of major commercial/industrial and mixed use
projects. Our staff includes:
• 34 American Institute of Certified Planners
• 6 Registered Environmental Assessors
• 2 Certified Environmental Inspectors
• 1 EPA -Certified Building Inspector and Management Planner for Asbestos
• 1 Registered Geologist/Certified Engineering Geologist
• 8 Licensed Landscape Architects
• UCI Certificate in Environmental Site Assessment and Remediation/40 hour OSHATraining
• Instructors in the areas of Energy Efficiency, Environmental Engineering and Water
Resources
• Over 300 Registered Civil, Traffic, Structural and Mechanical Engineers
ENTAL STUDIES
As a leader in the environmental field, RBF offers an extensive array of services associated with
environmental compliance and documentation. RBF provides evaluation for the full range of
environmental effects for all types of projects. Our award-winning team offers documentation in
compliance with environmental laws and regulations including CEQA, NEPA, the Clean WaterAct,
the Clean Air Act and other applicable environmental laws.
Environmental documents prepared at RBF address the full range of environmental and technical
issues, with in-house specialists providing technical evaluation for traffic and transportation, flood
control and drainage, air quality, noise, land use, socioeconomics, utilities and services, energy
conservation, visual and aesthetic effects, relevant planning, Phase I hazardous materials,
neighborhood and construction effects, landform modification, agricultural suitability and many other
environmental issue areas. RBF draws upon the profession's leading subconsultants for
specialized biological, archeological, geotechnical and fiscal/economic studies to build amulti-
disciplinaryteam ofenvironmental analysts. State-of-the-art computer facilities including Computer
Aided Drafting and Design (CADD), ARC/INFO, and specially created computer programs are
utilized in obtaining the highest level of technical completeness and efficiency.
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 27 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
SUMMARY OF KEY PROJECT EXPERIENCE
This section includes a summary of RBF's background involving similar projects. We have also
included a listing of additional projects for consideration.
Carrari Ranch Project EIR
City of Rancho Cucamonga
RBF is preparing an EIR for the Carrari Ranch Project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The
project site is located at the foot of the San Bernardino Mountains along the San Bernardino
National Forest. The Carrari Ranch Project requires the annexation of the project site into the City
of Rancho Cucamonga (and other affected agencies) and pre-zoning of the properties within the
annexation areas as Hillside Residential and Open Space. Additionally, the project involves
development of 110 residential units on 74 acres of the site while a remaining 596 acres would
remain undeveloped. The EIR analyzes numerous key issues including water and sewer service,
fire service, roadways and circulation, and public safety.
Pacific Trade Project Focused EIR
City of EI Monte
RBF Consulting is preparing a Focused EIR for the Pacific Trade Project located within the San
Gabriel Valley. The approximately 27-acre site is located within the northwestern portion of the City
of EI Monte's limits. The project proposes to develop the 27-acre site into commercial and industrial
uses. The project would require the subdivision of the site into three private parcel arid one public
parcels. The private parcels would be utilized for commercial and industrial development while the
public parcel would be utilized as a public roadway to provide access to the site. The private
parcels would have commercial condominiums, subterranean parking, a warehouse, office space,
and show rooms. Key environmental issues include air quality, hazards and hazardous materials,
noise, traffic and circulation, hydrology, and land use.
The Colonies at San Antonio Specific Plan Amendment EIR
City of Upland
RBF prepared an EIR for the Amendment to the Colonies at San Antonio Specific Plan. The project
site is located in the northeastern portion of the City of Upland, near the Upland -Rancho
Cucamonga city boundaries, and is bisected by the new Interstate 210 freeway. The project
includes 1150 residential dwelling units, 115 acres of commercial uses, a school site, fire station
site and natural open space areas. The EIR analyzes the comprehensive amendment tc the
approximately 450-acre Specific Plan area. Key issues evaluated include: land use and relevant
planning; aesthetics/light and glare; traffic and circulation; air quality; noise; biological resources;
geology and soils; hydrology and drainage; and public services and utilities.
Rialto Airport Specific Plan/EIR
City of Rialto
RBF prepared a Specific Plan and EIR for 3,131 acres surrounding the Rialto Municipal Airport. The
goal of this City-sponsored project is to improve economic vitality, the area's visual image, and in
general, enhance development of the area. With over 650 property owners (including a variety of
municipal agencies), an extensive public communication program was necessitated; this program
P146
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 28 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^
CONSLI LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
including property owner workshops, an advisory committee, and newsletters. Issues focused on
the proposed SR-30 Freeway and the economic benefits associated with a regional freeway
commercial corridor; an existing, operating landfill which is planning an expansion (impacting
Airport airspace); as well as issues related to the Airport (i.e., safety, noise, etc.). Proposed uses
include commercial, commercial recreation, a variety of industrial uses, as well as a potential
community college.
Cypress Business Park Environmental Review
City of Cypress
For more than a decade, RBF Consulting has been preparing environmental documents for
individual development projects within the 587-acre Cypress Business Park, which encompasses
six specific plan areas: Cypress Business and Professional Center, Cypress Corporate Center,
Cypress View Limited, McDonnell Center, Wayland/Cypress Business Center, and Lusk Company
Industrial Park. A range of business park-related land uses are allowed within the specific plan
areas including commercial, office, research and development, business park, light industrial,
manufacturing, warehouse, hotel, and golf course uses within the past four years. RBF Consulting
has prepared Mitigated Negative Declarations for the projects listed below.
• Ushio America -Walker Facility: a 72,427 square foot office/warehouse building on a 4.0-
acre site.
Marriott Residence Inn: a 155-room hotel on a 3.7-acre site.
• SHURflo Project: athree-building campus for SHURflo, including a 50,000 square foot office
building, a 91,618 square foot research and development building, and a 100,000 square
foot warehouse building on a 12.2-acre site.
• West Orangewood Water Well Project: a 1,000 foot deep water well and pumping facility on
a 3,500-square foot site.
• 6161 Chip Avenue: a 50,000 square foot speculative office/research and development
building on a 2.9-acre site.
• Vertex Standard: a 95,800 square foot office/warehouse building on a 6.0-acre site.
• 5730 Katella Avenue: a 62,700 square foot speculative research and development building
on a 4.3-acre site.
• Cypress Corporate Park: four speculative office/manufacturing/warehouse buildings totaling
208,271 square feet on a 10.83-acre site.
Vineyard Center Specific Plan Final EIR
City of Ontario
RBF prepared the Final EIR for the Vineyard Center Specific Plan which addressed three
alternative land use schemes. Schemes A and B, proposed by the applicant, consisted of a mixture
of commercial/retail, warehouse retail, hotel, commercial/office and industrial land uses. Scheme C
was developed by the City of Ontario to address a "retail only" Alternative eliminating the hotel,
industrial and warehouse retail land uses. Primary issues of concern addressed within the
document include:
• Circulation and traffic at several intersections would operate at LOS D or worse with project
implementation;
• Compatibility of the proposed planned commercial uses with surrounding existing uses;
Wind and water erosion during construction;
P147
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 29 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSLI LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
• Hydrology and drainage (including analysis for on-site detention basins);
• Views associated with replacing existing undeveloped area with planned commercial uses;
and
Noise on the surrounding street system from project-related traffic.
Yucaipa Valley Acres Final EIR (Chapman Heights Final Supplemental EIR)
County of San Bernardino/City of Yucaipa
RBF was hired by the County of San Bernardino to prepare a Final EIR analyzing the potential
environmental impacts associated with the proposed 1,012-acre, 3,847-unit planned development
located in the City of Yucaipa at the base of Grafton Hills, approximately four miles east of the City
of Redlands. RBF hydrologists were consulted to analyze stormflows relative to the portions ofthe
project that are located within a floodway. The recommendations of RBF's hydrologists included a
system of proposed improvements to reduce flood hazards both on and off the project site. Other
features of the plan requiring special technical analysis involved maintaining safe yields for project
water supplies, impacts on an on-site water reclamation facility, and management of traffic impacts.
RBF also prepared the Final Supplemental EIR for the revised project, referred to as the Chapman
Heights Planned Development. The project at that time was within the jurisdiction of the City of
Yucaipa.
Ontario Gateway Plaza Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario
RBF prepared the EIR for the Ontario Gateway Plaza Specific Plan site, located on 57.3 acres in
the City of Ontario in southwestern San Bernardino County. The Specific Plan proposed a General
Plan Amendment and Zone Change to accommodate development of 1,097,100 square feet of
commercial office and retail floor area. The EIR addressed contained extensive analysis of several
environmental issues, including:
• Traffic and circulation impacts due to the project's location on the northwestern corner of the
San Bernardino Freeway (f-10) and the Devore Freeway (I-15);
• Land use consistency with surrounding uses and existing on-site uses; and
• The project's effect on the regional jobs and housing balance.
North Downtown Lancaster Neighborhood Revitalization/Transit Village Plan EIR/EA
City of Lancaster
RBF prepared an EIR/EA fora 103-acre area in the Lancaster North Downtown area. The
proposed project represents the City's long-term program to retain and revitalize the historic
downtown area. The Plan was formulated with the involvement of various Stakeholders in the area.
The plan creates a framework to achieve the overall objectives of expanding and locating new
institutional uses in the area, providing adequate locations for various service providers,
rehabilitating or replacing deteriorated housing stock, providing recreational facilities and enhancing
commercial uses. The RBF team has provided comprehensive services for the project which
includes public participation, vision plan, design guidelines and standards, infrastructure studies
and required General Plan Amendments/Zone Changes. The environmental review has involved
traffic, historical resources, air, noise and hazardous materials.
P148
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 30 • February 19, 2008
P149
^ ^ ^ ^
C CNSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
EI Centro de Huntington Park
City of Huntington Park
RBF was called in by the Community Development Commission of the City of Huntington Park to
quickly prepare a Draft EIR in five weeks to meet the City's aggressive schedule. The project
proposes to redevelop the approximately 29-acre site from industrial uses to commercial uses.
Implementation of the proposed project will require the purchase and demolition of portions of
approximately 50 parcels, and demolition of 595,000 square feet of existing buildings. In total, the
new commercial development consists of approximately 490,000 square feet of retail and restaurant
uses. Project highlights include: Big-Box Retail Replacing Aging Industrial Uses; Compressed EIR
Production Time Frame; Urban Decay Study; and RBF Technical Studies for Traffic, Air Quality,
Noise, Hydrology, Water and Sewer.
Dominguez Hills Village Specific Plan EIR
City of Carson
RBF prepared the EIR for redevelopment of this Brea Canyon Oil Property. The project site has
been an oit producing and storage facility since the 1920s and also includes the Deepwater Iodides
facility, which has been remediated and removed. The 99.4-acre Specific Plan project proposed
992 residential units, a 50,000-square foot neighborhood retail center, child care facility, relocation
of oil production facilities, 355,000 square feet of light industrial uses, and a tank farm. As a related
project addressed within this EIR, City staff has developed aCity-wide Oil Well Ordinance that
would allow existing oil wells in residential and commercial areas to continue operating with a
Conditional Use Permit, including provision of submersed well heads, landscaping and noise
control. Primary issues addressed in the EIR include site remediation, land use compatibility, traffic,
noise, air quality, and potential school district formation.
Downtown and Central Long Beach Redevelopment Plans Master EIR
City of Long Beach
RBF is currently preparing a Master EIR for 10non-contiguous areas located within Downtown and
Central Long Beach. The project area is part of two redevelopment project areas: The Downtown
Redevelopment Project Area and Central Long Beach Redevelopment Project Area. The proposed
project involves removal of existing uses for development of new uses, adaptive reuse of existing
uses and development of new uses on vacant land. in addition, the work program has included
development of design concepts for four of the sites. The project proposes development of
residential, retail, mixed-use residential/retail and/or office uses, an Art Exchange, live/work units
and parking uses to assist in realizing the objectives and actions identified in the Downtown Long
Beach Strategic Action Plan and Strategic Guide forDevelopmentfor the Central Study Area. The
environmental review will involve aesthetics/light and glare, traffic and circulation, air quality, noise,
historic resources, public services and utilities, a water supply study in accordance with SB 610,
and hazardous materials assessments.
City of Santa Monica Environmental Studies
City of Santa Monica
RBF has prepared numerous EIRs and Initial Studies/Negative Declarations for projects located
within the City of Santa Monica. Key environmental issues addressed in these documents included
land use compatibility (primarily visual and noise related), traffic, and glare/shadows. These
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 31 February 19, 2008
P150
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
projects include: The Ravello Mixed Use Project Initial Study and Neighborhood Impact Statement
(commercial/retail uses, office and four apartment units); Pacific Garden Senior Group Housing
Project Initial Study and Neighborhood Impact Statement; The 2020 Santa Monica Boulevard
Parking Structure Initial Study and Neighborhood Impact Statement; The Third Street Mall and
Downtown Assessment District Improvement Project Initial Study and Neighborhood Impact
Statement; The Addendum to the Final Initial Study for the Proposed Senior Housing Project at
1121-1135 Third Street; The 100 Broadway Mixed Use Development Initial Study and
Neighborhood Impact Statement; The Criterion Theatre Complex Initial Study and Neighborhood
Impact Statement; The 1250 Fourth Street Mixed Use Office/Retail Building EIR; The Mixed-Use
Office, Retail Project at 401-415 Santa Monica Boulevard/1341-1347 Fourth Street EIR; The Ocean
Avenue Condominiums Initial Study and Neighborhood Impact Statement; Plaza Promenade,1343-
1349Third Street Environmental Impact Report; and the Upward Bound EIR (Senior Housing and
Transitional Housing).
PROJECT EXPERIENCE SUMMARY
The following is a summary of project background experience on environmental review projects:
Land Development Projects
Buena Vista/Kern River Ranch Program EIR -Bakersfield, CA
Colonies at San Antonio EIR -Upland, CA
Fagan Canyon Specific Plan Program EIR -Santa Paula, CA
Gosford-Panama Program EIR -Bakersfield, CA
Grand Canal EIR -Bakersfield, CA
Hi Hope Ranch MND -Oceanside, CA
Lancaster Capital, LLC Tentative Tract 53229 -Lancaster, CA
Lyons Canyon Ranch Specific Plan EIR -Santa Clarita, CA
Moffett Towers Corporate Campus -Sunnyvale, CA
Oasis Road Specific Plan Master EIR -Redding, CA
Rio Bravo Program EIR -Bakersfield, CA
Robinson Ranch North EIR -Yucaipa, CA
Shoppes at Chino Hills EIR -Chino Hills, CA
Soledad Village EIR -Santa Clarita, CA
St. Cloud Tentative Tract Map MND -Oceanside, CA
University Village and Orchard Park Specific Plans EIR -Loma Linda, CA
Village of Del Lago at Quintana -Thermal, CA
Redevelopment/Brownfield Projects
Beverly Wilshire Office Building EIR -Beverly Hills, CA
Clearwater Specific Plan EIR -Mammoth Lakes, CA
Fair Isaac Redevelopment Project -San Rafael, CA
Garvey Villas IS/MND -Monterey Park, CA
Gateway Plaza -Santa Cruz, CA
Montage Project EIR -Beverly Hills, CA
North Downtown Lancaster Transit Village EIR/EA-Lancaster, CA
Redlands Mall Redevelopment Project EIR -Redlands, CA
San Gabriel Center EIR -San Gabriel, CA
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 32 • February 19, 2008
P151
^ ^ ^ ^
CGNSLJ LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
Shoreline Gateway EIR -Long Beach, CA
Southeast Coastal Redevelopment Plan EIR -Huntington Beach, CA
Uptown Orange Mixed Use Project MND -Orange, CA
Industrial/Commercial Projects
Blue Rock Business Center EIR-Antioch, CA
Boeing Specific Plan EIR -Seal Beach, CA
Broadway Plaza Shopping Center Technical Studies -Chula Vista, CA
CA Army National Guard Maintenance Facility EA -Riverside, CA
EI Centro de Huntington Park EIR -Huntington Park, CA
Eldorado National Forest Telecommunications Project EA - EI Dorado National Forest, CA
Firestone Mastercare Center Technical Studies -Chino Hills, CA
Mariner's Mile Gateway Project MND -Newport Beach, CA
National City Costco Technical Studies -National City, CA
Pine Corporate Center Technical Studies -Chino Hills, CA
Super Wal-Mart Commercial Center EIR -Rialto, CA
Tyler Mall EIR Addendum -Riverside, CA
Vitner Square Shopping Center EIR -Lodi, CA
Policy Planning Studies
City of Angels Camp General Plan Update Studies -Angels Camp, CA
City of Carson General Plan Update and EIR -Carson, CA
City of Cerritos General Plan Update and EIR -Cerritos, CA
City of Costa Mesa General Plan Update and EIR -Costa Mesa, CA
City of Cypress General Plan Update and EIR -Cypress, CA
City of Glendora General Plan Update and EIR -Glendora, CA
City of Lancaster General Plan Update -Lancaster, CA
City of Stanton General Plan Update and EIR -Stanton, CA
Dana Point Town Center IS/MND -Dana Point, CA
Downtown Sierra Madre Specific Plan EIR -Sierra Madre, CA
Palmdale Transit Village Specific Plan EIR -Palmdale, CA
Route 66 Specific Plan EIR -Glendora, CA
Town of Los Gatos General Plan Update and EIR -Los Gatos, CA
Watsonville General Plan Update EIR -Watsonville, CA
ResortslRecreation
Anaverde Basin/Sports Complex EIR -Palmdale, CA
Berryessa Creek Trail Reach 3 MND/CE -Milpitas, CA
Cypress Skate Park Technical Studies -Cypress, CA
Gilroy Golf Course EIR -Gilroy, CA
Hotel del Coronado Master Plan EIR -Coronado, CA
Loch Lomond Marina -San Rafael, CA
Long Point Resort EIR -Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
McKean Sportsfield Complex EIR -San Jose, CA
North Village Specific Plan EIR -Mammoth Lakes, CA
Santa Cruz Coast Hotel EIR -Santa Cruz, CA
Santa Rosa Creek Trail IS/MND -Cambria CSD, CA
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 33 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
C~NSLJ LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
Transportation Projects
Allen Road Bridge over the Kern River- Bakersfield, CA
Foothill Parkway Westerly EIR -Corona, CA
I-10/Jefferson Interchange EA/IS -Indio, CA
I-880 IS/EA -Alameda County, CA
Irvine Transit Center Carbon Monoxide Hotspot Conformity- Irvine, CA
North Peak Northern Access Road MND/EA -Riverside County, CA
SR-57 Widening EA/IS -Orange County Transportation Authority, CA
SR-118/Alamos Canyon Interchange EA/EIR -Simi Valley, CA
SR-154 Group II Improvement Studies -Santa Barbara County, CA
Public Facilities
4`h Appellate Courthouse Replacement IS/MND -Santa Ana, CA
Coronado School District Master Facilities EIR -Coronado USD, CA
Dana Point Harbor Revitalization Project EIR -Dana Point, CA
Genomics Building MND, UC Riverside, CA
Fox Theater Renovation MND -Riverside, CA
Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital Master Plan EIR -Santa Clarita, CA
Huntington Beach Gun Range EIR -Huntington Beach, CA
Kaiser Permanente Hospital EIR Addendum -Downey, CA
Ocean Education Center EIR -Dana Point, CA
UCLA Film and Television Archive Preservation Center MND -Santa Clarita, CA
Desalination Projects
Cambria Desalination EIR -Cambria CSD, CA
Coastal Water Project -Monterey County, CA
Encina Desalination EIR - SDCWA, CA
Marina Coast Water District Desalter Project EIR Support -Monterey County, CA
Poseidon Resources Desalination Project EIR -Huntington Beach, CA
Under Ocean Floor Seawater Intake and Discharge Project IS/EA -Long Beach, CA
Energy Projects
BP Cogeneration Facility -Carson, CA
EI Segundo Redevelopment Power Plant Project - EI Segundo, CA
Granite Fox Power Project -Gerlach, NV
Long Beach Power Project -Long Beach, CA
Mountainview Power Plant Project -Mountain View, CA
Nueva Azalea Power Plant Project- Downey, CA
Palomar Energy Project -Escondido, CA
South Shore Power Project -Bridgman, Michigan
Termoelectrica de Mexicali Project -Mexicali, Mexico
Water/Wastewater Projects
Arlington Desalter Enhancement Project IS/MND -Riverside County, CA
P152
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 34 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CO NSLJ LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
Barstow Wastewater Reclamation Facility Upgrades Project IS/MND -Barstow, CA
Cambria Wastewater Treatment Plant EIR -Cambria CSD, CA
Cambria Effluent Disposal Ponds EIR -Cambria CSD, CA
Chino Hills Water Supply and Distribution EIR -Chino Hills, CA
Los Alamitos Pump Station IS/MND -Seal Beach, CA
Metropolitan Water District Statewide Reservoir Reconnaissance Study -Statewide, CA
Santa Fe Valley Treatment Plant EIR -Rancho Santa Fe Community Services District, CA
Victor Valley Wastewater Facility -Victor Valley, CA
Drainage/VNater Quality Projects
Amargosa Creek Improvement Project EIR -Palmdale, CA
Calleguas Creek Sediment Control/Bank Protection EIR -Ventura County, CA
Ironwood State Prison Erosion Control Project IS/MND -Blythe, CA
Mahon Creek Enhancement EIR -San Rafael, CA
On-Call Environmental Services
CA Department of Transportation
Cambria Community Services District, CA
City of Bakersfield, CA
City of Cypress, CA
City of Lancaster, CA
City of Long Beach, CA
City of Milpitas, CA
City of Seal Beach, CA
City of Westminster, CA
County of Kern, CA
Town of Mammoth Lakes, CA
P153
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 35 • February 19, 2008
P154
PROJECT NIGNLIGNTS
^ CEQA documentation:
Environmental Impact Report
^ 381-acres
^ Annexation of Ciry's Sphere of
Influence
^ 110- single family dwelling units
^ Public Safety/Fire Safety Concerns
Reference:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Ms. Candyce Burnett, Associate
Planner
909/477-2750
Carrari Ranch Project EIR
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
RBF Consulting (RBF) is preparing an Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Carrari Ranch
Project. Located at the foot of the San Bernardino mountains along
the San Bernardino National Forest, the project proposes to annex
approximately 381-acre area. The project proposes to develop 74
acres and leave 307 acres undeveloped. Approximately I10-single
family residential units are proposed within the 74 developed land.
The proposed project requires a few amendments and agreements,
among them are a General Plan Amendment, a Development District
Amendment, a Hillside Development Regulation Addendum, and a
Development Agreement. Some key issues related to [he project
include public safety, specifically fire safety, traffic and circulation,
land use and relevant planning, aesthetics, biological resources,
hydrology and drainage, and geology and sails.
~w~., ~...~..®...ed,.,,...>..,......~....,...
. ... ....... h~lwnry
-~~- Vmv~vkvm,
......._..... ww.m.s~m.e~~en
cor+eu~n wo
P155
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
^ Focused Traffic Impac[Analysis
^ Acoustical Assessment
Reference:
Marketplace Properties
18231 Irvine Boulevard, Suite 201
Tustin, CA 92780
Mr. Don Howard
Etiwanda Baseline Retail Project
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
RBF Consulting prepared a Focused Traffic Impact Analysis far the
Etiwanda Marketplace Project located within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. The project proposes approximately 15,000 square feet
of retail with Sl parking stalls, and a drive through window that would
cover approximately 96,000 gross square feet. The project is located
at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Baseline Road
intersection south of Victoria Street, north of Miller Avenue, and east
of Etiwanda Avenue.
The Focused Traffic Impact Malysis focused on two intersections,
Etiwanda AvenueBaseline Road intersection and Etiwanda
AvenueNictoria Stree[ intersection, and analyzed existing conditions,
2009 without project conditions, and 2009 with project conditions.
The Acoustical Analysis focused on the projecYS short- and long-term
impacts to the surrounding sensitive receptors, including the
residential uses nearby and schools.
coNaumr+o
P156
PROJECT NIGNLIGNTS
^ 450-Acre Specific Plan The Colonies at San Antonio Specific Plan EIR
Upland, CA
^ Adjacent to Planned /-210
Extension RBF Consulting (RBF) prepared the Specific Plan Amendment EIR
^ Freeway Related Commercial Uses for the Colonies at San Antonio. The project site is located in the
northeastern portion of the City of Upland, near the Upland -Rancho
Cucamonga city boundaries, and is bisected by the new Interstate 210
freeway. The EIR analyzed the comprehensive amendment to the
Reference: approximately 450-acre Specific Plan area. Key issues evaluated
City of Upland included: land use and relevant planning; aesthetics/light and glare;
460 North Euclid Avenue traffic and circulation; air quality; noise; biological resources; geology
Upland, CA 91786 and soils; hydrology and drainage; and public services and utilities.
Mr. Jeff Bloom, 909/931-4131
02?JB-10/410] coueuvwo
P157
PROJECT FIIGNLIGNTS
^ Preparation of an Environmental North Downtown Lancaster Neighborhood Revitalization
AssessmenrforHUD /Transit Village Plan EIR/EA
Laneaster, CA
^ Revitalization and Redevelopment
of North Downtown Area
RBF Consulting (RBF) prepared an EIR/EA fora 103-acre area in
the Lancaster North Downtown area. The proposed project
represents the City's long-term program to retain and revitalize the
Reference: historic downtown area. The plan was formulated with [he
City of Lancaster involvement of various stakeholders in the area. The plan creates a
44933 North Fern Avenue framework to achieve the overall objectives of expanding and locating
Lancaster, CA 93534 new institutional uses in the area, providing adequate locations for
Mr. Brian Ludicke, 661/723-6105 various service providers, rehabilitating or replacing deteriorated
housing stock, providing recreational facilities and enhancing
commercial uses. The RBF Team provided comprehensive services
for the project, including public participation, vision plan, design
guidelines and standards, infrastructure studies and required General
Plan Amendments /Zone Changes. The environmental review
involved traffic, historical resources, air, noise and hazardous
materials.
b:~. '~W ~tbrnfio•
® w•v Ewes
ttmniV~
® hMM6WM
o 0uf~tw
e ®WP.,.,.•.
~• ~ eo.a..mo-m.~
m ~ u~r rn.no-...
~+vwrerca.dml
® eas. ~
^ ®n.. wm
,~; ®y.„..~n.~..na
cs
®n
i- c .:C ..wro. wn
~ x _. ~~
' ®n~eo-w
• ~ p .
~.ly:
®sw.e.~wM we,
'
' ;' ®~~sro
_
{r ®~..,~~...
„ ~
~ •-
ti ,
_ „~,.~.~,,..d~....
-" - ,. ~.,.,nw,.~n„n,
NpM D•wnlvn~ t•nfYbrTnMX VIIIXN Vlibn PI•n
pMfl .4y t4 NOt
01839- IN/45 cor+aoviNu
P158
PROJECT NIGNLIGMTS
^ Eztensive Pubic Outreach
^ Multi-Agency Coordination
^ Program EIR
Reference:
Town of Mammoth Lakes
437 Old Mammoth Road
Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546
Ms. Karen Johnston, 760/934-8989
mm-mum
Mammoth Lakes Redevelopment Plan
Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
Town of Mammoth Lakes, CA
RBF Consulting (RBF) completed a Program EIR for the Town of
Mammoth Lakes Redevelopment Agency. The project is a
comprehensive redevelopment program to remedy detrimental
physical, social, and economic conditions found within the Town. In
addition, the project included improvements for street, water system,
snow storage, drainage, and flood control. The work program
included an extensive public outreach program and consultations with
Mono County and various service and utility agencies. RBF was
actively involved in the project from initiation, working with the
redeveloping consultant, facilitating public meetings, and participating
in review of a legal challenge.
ccvauin.o
P159
PROJECT NIGNLIGNTS
^ 172-Acre Coastal Southeast Coastal Redevelopment Plan Program EIR
Redevelopment Area City of Huntington Beach, CA
^ On-Site Land Uses Include the RBF Consulting (RBF) prepared the Program EIR for the 172-acre
AES Generating Station, aState-
Listed Supetfund Site, Wetlands, Southeast Coastal Redevelopment Plan. The Plan proposed to
and I~arious Industrial Uses generate tax increment revenues to facilitate improvements to the
blighted project area without changing General Plan or Zoning
^ Extensive Public designations. On-site land uses include the AES Generating Station, a
Outreach Program state-listed Superfund site, wetlands, and various industrial uses. The
site is adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway, and is bordered by
residential uses on three sides, and Edison Community Center and a
Reference: farmer landfill to the North.
Rosenow Spevacek Group (RSG)
Jim Simon, 714/541-4505
Key issues analyzed within the Environmental Impact Report include
land use, relevant planning, traffic, aesthetics, biological resources,
geology, noise, air quality, and cultural resources.
The environmental process for this project involved an extensive
--...~-. public outreach program, which included numerous community
_
z ~ -,~ ~; meetings and public hearings.
-,
o131a-1]/pro3 coweu~n.n
P160
PROJECT NIGNLIGNTS
^ Prepared a Subsequent Program
EIR for 1,156-acre expansion of
the San Sevaine Redevelopment on
an accelerated project schedule
^ Completed project on time and
within budget
^ Streamlined process by relying on
existing planning documents and
technical studies
^ Subsequent Program EIR and
Amended Redevelopment Plan
approved without any opposition
Reference:
Rosenow Spevacek Group
309 West 4th Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4502
Ms. Felise Acosta, 714/541-4585
San Sevaine Amended Redevelopment Plan
Subsequent Program EIR
San Bernardino County, CA
RBF Consulting (RBF) was retained by the San Bernardino County
Redevelopment Agency to prepare a Program-level EIR for an
amendment to the San Sevaine Redevelopment Plan. The proposed
amendment sought to expand the existing redevelopment plan area,
which is located west of Fontana and east of Ontario and Rancho
Cucamonga, by 1,156 acres. Included in the amended redevelopment
plan was a description of future capital improvement projects the
Redevelopment Agency planned to implement under the plan.
RBF was able to minimize the cost of the EIR by relying on the
existing planning documents and technical studies supplied by the
Redevelopment Agency. This allowed for the EIR to be submitted on
time and within budget in accordance with the accelerated project
schedule. The Draft EIR was submitted in June 2004 and the Final
EIR was submitted in September 2004. The San Bernardino County
Planning Commission and the San Bernardino County Board of
Supervisors ultimately approved the EIR and redevelopment plan
amendment without any legal or political opposition.
~ t
-._ ,T -
i -- - ~
I,
t
d.a,>.
_ - ---- -I
I
~
r
~ t
f
F
t ~ _
LRgantl
ReCevelopmeM Ales
- Ag1vJ Mua
Edtl4q
Coy ~+/
- Spwb
f~ ~ A ®~ ~~w~.i woimiy
01]H-3R9/-5 Corvou~TIMG
61
PROJECT FIIGNLIGHTS
^ Neo-Traditional Land Design Rich Haven Mixed-Use Specific Plan
Ontario, CA
^ Mixed-Use Regional
Commercial Center RBF Consulting (RBF) was selected by Richland Communities and
^ 1~ariety of Housing Types Watt Genton Associates to prepare a Specific Plan for [he Rich-
Haven Development. The 510.6-acre parcel is part of a larger parcel
^ Pedestrian Paseo System annexed into the City of Ontario in 1998, and subject to the New
Model Colony (NMC) General Plan Amendment (GPA) design
^ Trip Budge[ Density guidelines adopted in 1998.
Transfer Mechanisms
^ Pan of the GreaterNMC GPA The objective of this specific plan is to develop a cohesive and self-
sustaining community consisting of well integrated neighborhoods
^ Utility Comdor Constraints with residential, regional commercial, and community facility land
uses. RBF prepared specific development standards, design
guidelines, and a land use plan to fit within the vision and framework
of [he NMC. The specific plan will be used as an implementation tool
Reference:
Richland Communities to augment the NMC GPA for future development in the plan area.
4100 Newport Place In order to comply with the vision and objectives of the NMC GPA,
Suite 800 this plan incorporates a mixture of uses with a unique identity,
Newport Beach, CA 92660 incorporating "live, work, and play" opportunities and a series of
Mr. Jim Powers, 949/261-7010 connecting trails, sidewalks, and transit stops to encourage pedestrian
and bicycle mobility. "Main Street" commercial/retail, civic, and
cultural uses, provide a central focus for the community. Public
spaces, such as small parks and plazas, have been designed to create
synergy between adjacent land uses.
o- -
- ~
=
~
::':~ _
I ~
_ _
~
~__._._
. ~- _--: -__._
~~ _~G _.
~~~
-II i ~ _.~
,W I~'"' LANO IISL ~P .AN
02121-220/0]
core u~nrn
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
V. PROJECT TEAM
The following are brief background descriptions for the key professionals who would be responsible
for preparing the EIR. The percentage of hours of each staff member and individual tasks are
included in the Fee Summary.
Glenn Lajoie, AICP
Project Assignment: Project Director
Mr. Lajoie is the Environmental Planning Manager and oversees a team of 22 professionals in
Irvine. Mr. Lajoie's primary responsibilities include oversight of daily operations, management of
projects, staff mentoring and instruction, scheduling, and business development. With 20 years of
practical experience, Mr. Lajoie is a recognized leader in CEQA and NEPA studies (EIR's, EIS's,
Negative Declarations, Environmental Assessments), as well as other policy planning documents,
including General Plans, Area Plans, Specific Plans, and due diligence studies. Projects have
ranged from private entitlement applications related to residential and commercial projects as well
as a variety of water, wastewater, highway, and redevelopment projects throughout California.
Project responsibilities include analysis, technical review and management of environmental and
policy planning documentation for compliance with CEQA/NEPA, implementation of public
participation programs, and assistance to various public and private sector clients in meeting the
requirements of local, State, and Federal agencies. Relevant project management experience
includes the Carrari Ranch Project EIR in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Colonies at San
Antonio Specific Plan Amendment EIR in Upland, North Downtown Lancaster Neighborhood
Revitalization/Transit Village Plan and EIR/EA; the Long Point Coastal Development Plan EIR in
Rancho Palos Verdes; the Hotel del Coronado Specific Plan EIR in Coronado; the Cambria
Desalination Facility EIR; the Costa Mesa General Plan Update and EIR; the North Village Specific
Plan Program EIR in Mammoth Lakes; the Marymount College Facilities Expansion EIR in Rancho
Palos Verdes; the Grand Canal Entertainment Center EIR in Bakersfield; and the Escondido
Performing Arts and Justice Center EIR in Escondido.
Mr. Lajoie also oversees on-call environmental services assignments in Long Beach, Santa Ana,
Westminster and in Cambria. Mr. Lajoie is the Project Manager for a current EIR in Long Beach
involving projects within the Downtown and Central Long Beach Redevelopment Plan areas and
recently served as Project Director for the Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel EIR and the
Shoreline Gateway EIR in Long Beach. Mr. Lajoie is also currently serving as Project Director for
the Carrari Ranch Project EIR in Rancho Cucamonga.
Alan Ashimine
Project Assignment: Project Manager
Mr. Ashimine, as a Project Managerwith the Environmental Planning group, oversees and prepares
environmental studies for public and private sectors clients, under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Mr. Ashimine draws on his
broad background and understanding of environmental constraints to provide technical and CEQA
compliance review and environmental documentation, in addition to research, analysis, and writing.
Mr. Ashimine has either managed or coordinated a wide range of environmental planning projects,
including environmental documents for major infill and redevelopment projects, land development
projects, highly controversial hillside developments, and water resources infrastructure, among
others. Mr. Ashimine is currently serving as Project Manager for the Carrari Ranch Project EIR in
P162
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 36 • February 19, 2008
P163
^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
Rancho Cucamonga. Relevant project experience includes the Pacific Trade Focused EIR in EI
Monte, the Southeast Coastal Redevelopment Plan EIR in Huntington Beach, Southern California
Logistics Airport Specific Plan Amendment EIR in Victorville, and the Old Town Yucca Valley
Specific Plan EIR in Yucca Valley.
Michelle Dunn
Project Assignment: Environmental Analyst
Ms. Dunn prepares environmental compliance studies under CEQA for both public and private
sector clients. Ms. Dunn's experience includes residential, infrastructure, coastal, and industrial
projects, among others. Through her experience in analysis, research, and writing of environmental
impact documentation, Ms. Dunn provides comprehensive services to assist Clients in project
compliance review. Ms. Dunn's project experience includes the Carrari Ranch Project EIR in
Rancho Cucamonga, the Parking Lots Project EIR in San Fernando, the 601 North Park Center
Drive IS/MND in Santa Ana, the North Beverly Drive Project EIR in Beverly Hills, the North Village
Specific Plan EIR for the Town of Mammoth Lakes, the Seawater Desalination Project EIR at
Huntington Beach, Regional Seawater Desalination Project at Encina EIR in Carlsbad, the City of
Artesia General Plan Update, the City of Glendora General Plan Update, the Clearwater Specific
Plan EIR in the Town of Mammoth Lakes, the Downtown Revitalization Project EIR for South
Pasadena, the San Fernando Parking Lots Projects EIR in San Fernando, the Sherwin Project EIR
in the Town of Mammoth Lakes, and several other projects involving complex hazardous materials,
air quality, noise, residential, and traffic issues.
Eddie Torres, INCE
Project Assignment: Air Quality Study and Acoustical Study
Mr. Torres received two BAs from the University of California, Irvine (UCI) in Environmental
Analysis and Design and Mechanical Engineering and most recently a MS at the University of
Southern California (USC) for Mechanical Engineering. As a Project Manager/Environmental
Analyst at RBF, Mr. Torres prepares Environmental and Planning Studies for public and private
sector clients under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Mr. Torres has extensive
experience in the research, analysis, and writing of CEQA documentation for a variety of projects
involving infrastructure, redevelopment, residential, commercial, mixed-use, and industrial uses.
Utilizing his broad background and understanding of environmental constraints. Mr. Torres provides
technical and CEQA compliance review and environmental documentation including EIR's and
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declarations. Mr. Torres also has experience with noise monitoring
using Type I rated instruments, as well as sophisticated noise modeling using FHWA-RD-77-108
and Traffic Noise Model 2.5. Mr. Torres also can provide full-range noise measurement
spectragraphs utilizing the Larson Davis and Briiel & Kjaer Data Noise Analysis software.
Additionally, his expertise in Air Quality Assessment includes technical modeling experience using
various CARB and EPA approved programs: He has been involved with a wide range of public and
private developments within the State of California, with work in several air districts from the
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) to the San Diego Air
Pollution Control District (SDAPCD).
Bob Matson
Project Assignment: Transportation Study
Bob Matson has many years of diverse traffic and transportation experience in preparing a wide
range of traffic studies and transportation planning analyses. Mr. Matson and his staff generate a
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 37 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
variety of traffic/transportation studies to analyze and document projects at various stages of
development, such as conceptual planning, preliminary engineering, agency general plan/zoning
modifications, environmental documentation, projecUinfrastructureyhasing, site plans, tract maps,
final engineering, construction traffic management plans, and parking studies. His expertise allows
him to work effectively with local, state and private sectors. Mr. Matson's experience includes
preparing traffic study's for the Carrari Ranch Project in Rancho Cucamonga, the Etiwanda
Marketplace Project in Rancho Cucamonga, the Redlands Village Town Center Project in
Redlands, Moreno Valley Mall Project in Moreno Valley, the Southern California Logistics Airport in
Victorville, the Laguna Beach Downtown Traffic Impact Analysis in Laguna Beach, the Mariner's
Mile Gateway in Newport Beach, and the Carson Marketplace Onsite Circulation Analysis in
Carson.
Richard Beck, REA
Project Assignment: Hazards and Hazardous Materials Study
Mr. Beck assists in the preparation of environmental and planning studies for public and private
sector clients, with a focus on due diligence planning activities. As the Regulatory Coordinator at
RBF, Mr. Beck is involved with regulatory permit processing pursuant to Sections 404 and 401 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code. Included in
this area of study, Mr. Beck also conducts jurisdictional delineations and acts as a liaison between
public and private sector clients and State and Federal regulatory agencies. In addition to
regulatory issues, Mr. Beck prepares Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Initial Site
Assessments for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and Environmental
Baseline Surveys for the Department of the Navy. Mr. Beck also assists in the preparation of
documents with respect to CEQA and NEPA.
Rebecca Kinney, P.E.
Project Assignment: Hydrology and Drainage Peer Review
Ms. Kinney has many years of experience in all phases of stormwater management projects
including planning, design, and construction. Her recent experience has focused on development
of Master Plans of Drainage, which focus on hydrology, storm drainage facility sizing, stormwater
NPDES compliance, stream stability, and floodplain management. Ms. Kinney also has experience
in floodplain management, including revisions to development codes. She is also experienced in
channel restoration design work, including hydrologic and hydraulic modeling and PS&E work. Ms.
Kinney has served as a regulatory agent for permit applications 404 (ACOE), 401 (California
Regional Water Quality Control Board), and 1601/1603 (California of Department of Fish and
Game). She received wetland delineation training by the Wetland Training Institute. Her
knowledge of both engineering and environmental requirements makes her an asset to any
multidisciplinary team.
P164
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 38 • February 19, 2008
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
City of
Rancho Cucamonga
Glenn Lajoie, AICP
Project Director
Alan Ashimine I
Project Manager
Michelle Dunn
Environmental Analyst
Eddie Torres, INCE
Air Quality Study and Acoustical Study
Richard Beck, REA
Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment
Bob Matson
Traffic Impact Analysis
Rebecca Kinney, P.E.
Hydrology and Drainage Peer Review
P165
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 39 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CCN5LI LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
VI. STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
This proposal shall be valid for a period of 90 days. Progress billings will be forwarded based on
payment criteria established by the City. These billings will include the fees earned for the billing
period. The City shall make every reasonable effort to review invoices within fifteen (15) working
days from the date of receipt of the invoices and notify Consultant in writing of any particular item
that is alleged to be incorrect.
The fees proposed herein shall apply until March 1, 2009. Due to annual increases in costs
associated with inflation, staff wage increases and increases in direct costs, Consultant will
increase those portions of the contract fee for which work must still be completed after March 1,
2009, by fifteen percent (15%).
Deviations or modifications from the Scope of Work will result in potential re-evaluation of the
associated fees. Items not soecificalty stated in the proposal will be considered an additional work
item.
All work will be performed at a "Not to Exceed" contract price, which will become the fixed price
upon completion of negotiations with the City staff authorized to negotiate and agreement. The
total budget includes all miscellaneous costs for travel/mileage, reproduction, telephone, postal,
delivery, reference materials, and incidental expenses.
The budget provides a breakdown of our estimated cost of performing the services described in this
Scope of Services. Our Scope of Services and its associated cost are based on several key
assumptions, including the following:
1. The budget is valid for up to six months from the date of submittal/opening, after which it
may be subject to revision.
City will develop the mailing list for distribution of the EIR and notices. The City will be
responsible for newspaper cost of publication of notices, which will be billed directly to the
City, so they are not included in the proposed budget.
3. Photocopy costs included in the proposal are for the specified number of copies of
deliverables and reasonable incidental and in-team photocopying. If additional copies of
deliverables are needed, they can be provided with an amendment to the proposed budget.
4. Review cycles for preliminary documents are presented in the scope of work. Additional
review cycles or additional versions of administrative drafts are assumed to not be needed.
5. The proposed work addresses CEQA requirements of the proposed action. Work related to
NEPA compliance, Section 404 compliance, or other permitting processes is not included
(although these can be added, as needed, with a contract amendment). Work concludes at
the acceptance by the City of the final deliverable.
6. The budget is based on completion of work within an agreed upon schedule. If substantial
delay occurs, an amendment of the budget would be warranted to accommodate additional
project management time and other costs. Substantial delay is normally defined as 90 days
or more.
P166
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 40 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSULTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
7. Costs are included for the number of meetings specified in the scope of work. If additional
meetings are needed, they can be included with an amendment of the budget.
8. The extent of public comment on a Draft EIR is not predictable. The proposed budget
includes a reasonable, preliminary estimate time to respond to comments. RBF will consult
with the City after the valuation of the comments to determine if the preliminarily estimated
budget is sufficient. An excessive amount of comments is generally considered to be more
than thirty (30) commenting agencies/individuals and/or over 150 comments that require
answers other than "Comment is noted."
9. Costs have been allocated to tasks to determine the total budget. RBF may reallocate
costs among tasks, as needed, as long as the total budget is not exceeded.
10. Once the proposed project description, baseline, and alternatives are approved by the City
for analysis in the Draft EIR, it is assumed they will not change thereafter. If changes
requiring revisions to analysis or rewriting of EIR information occur, an amendment of the
budget would be warranted.
11. The CEQA statutes or guidelines may change during the course of this EIR. If
amendments require redoing work already performed or substantially increasing effort, a
contract amendment may be warranted.
P167
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 41 February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSLI LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
VII. BUDGET
RBF has provided a budget for preparation of an Initial Study, in addition to two alternative budget
scenarios for preparation of either an MND or an EIR.
1.0 PREPARATION OF AN INITIAL STUDY
TASK G.L.
210 A.A.
135 M.D.
100 G.A.
60 Total
Hours TechStudy Repro Total
Cost
1.0 PROJECTSCOPING
1.1 Pro ecl Kick-Off and Pro ect Characteristics 6 6 6 18 $2,670
1.2 Research and Investi anon 2 4 6 $670
1.3 A en Consultation 2 4 6 $670
1.4 Field Reconnaissance 4 4 8 $940
1.5 Initial Stud 1 8 30 6 45 $4,650
1.6 initial Stud Determination 8 8 16 $2,760
1.7 Deliverables $250 $250
TOTAL HOURS 15 30 48 6 99
'Percent of Total Labor (Hours) 15.2% 30.3°k 48.5% 6.1
SUBTOTAL LABOR COSTS $3,150 $4,050 $4,800 $360 $0 $250 $12,610
TOTAL LABOR COSTS $12,610
2.0 ALTERNATIVE 1 -PREPARATION OF AN MND
TASK G.L.
210 A.A.
135 M.D.
100 G.A.
60 Total
Haurs Tech
Study Repro Total
Cost
2.0 ALTERNATIVE 1 • PREPARATION OF A MND
2.1 Preparation of a Screencheck MND
2.1.1 Environmental Anal sis t 12 80 93 $9,830
H drol andDraina ePeerReview $6,300 $6,300
Prelimina Hazardous Materials Assessment $12,000 $12,000
2.1.2 Gra hic Exhibits 8 8 $480
2.1.3 ScreencheckDraftMND 2 4 12 18 $2,160
2.2 Draft MND 1 2 8 11 $1,280
2.3 Finai MND 1 2 8 11 $1,280
2.3.1 Res nse to Comments 1 2 12 15 $1,680
2.3.2 Mi6 a6on Monilprin Pr ram 1 2 8 11 $1,280
2.4 Nohce of Determination 1 1 4 6 $745
2.5 Meelin s and Coordination 8 20 6 34 $4,960
2.6 Deliverables $2,500 $2,500
TOTAL HOURS 16 45 138 8 207
'Percent of Total Labor (Hours) 7.7% 21.7% 66.7% 3.9%
SUBTOTAL LABORCO$TS $3,360 $6,075 $13,800 $480 $18,300 $2,500 $44,515
TOTAL LABOR COSTS $44,515
P168
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 42 • February 19, 2008
^ ^ ^ ^
CONSLJ LTING
Proposal for the Biane Business Park Project
Environmental Services
3.0 ALTERNATIVE 2 -PREPARATION OF AN EIR
TASK G.L.
110 A.A.
136 M.D.
100 GA.
60 Total
Hours Tech
Study Repro Total
Cost
3.0 ALTERNATIVE 2 • PREPARATION OF AN EIR
3.1 Notice of Pre oration 1 2 2 5 $680
3.2 Sce in Meefin 6 6 12 $2,070
3.2 Pre aratlon of a Screencheck EIR
3.3.1 Introduction and Pu ce 1 1 7 9 $1,045
3.3.2 Executive Summa 1 2 10 13 $1480
3.3.3 Pro'ect Descri lion
3.3.4 Thresholds of Si nifrance
3.3.5 Cumulative Pro'eds to be Considered 2
1
1 20
2
2
4
12 22
7
15 $3,120
$860
$1,680
3.3.6 Environmental Anal sis
A. Aesthetics, Li ht and Glare
B. Air Qualit
1
1
2
4
24
20
27
25
$6,500
$2,880
811,2517
C. Cultural Resources
D. Hazards and Haurdous Materials 1
1 4
2 16
16 21
19
$12,000 $2,350
814 080
E. H drolo and Water pualit 1 4 16 21 SQ300 $8,650
F. Land Use and Plannin 1 4 30 35 $3,750
G. Noise 1 4 24 29 $8,900 $12,050
H. Trans nation and Tratfc 1 4 24 29 $26,400 $29,550
I. Public Services and Utilities
3.3.1 Efleds Found Nol To Be Si nificant 1
1 2
2 40
4 43
7 $4,480
$880
3.3.8 Growth Inducement 1 2 8 11 $1,280
3.3.9 Cumulative Im ads 1 6 6 13 $1,620
3.3.10 ANernatives to the Pro sect Action 1 2 24 27 $2,880
3.3.11 Additional Sections 1 2 8 it $1,280
3.3.12 Gra hic Exhibits i 2 24 27 $1,920
3.4 Draft EIR
3.4.1 Prelimina Deft EIR 2 8 24 34 53,900
3.4.2 Com letion of Drag EIR 2 4 18 4 28 $3,000
3.5 Final EIR
3.5.1 Res rise to Comments 2 20 24 46 $5,520
3.5.2 Mi5 aticn Monitorin Pr ram 1 2 10 13 $1,480
3.5.3 Findin sand Statement of Ovenidin Considerations 1 4 20 25 $2,750
3.6 Pro ect Coordinatlon and Meetin s
3.6.1 CooNination 24 55 40 119 $16,465
3.6.2 Meetin s 40 90 32 162 $23,750
3.7 Deliverables $0
3.7.1 NOP Distribution 5750
3.7.2 Pre oration of Screencheck Draft EIR $1,500 $1,500
3.7.3 Draft EIR
3.7.4 Final EIR
TOTAL HOURS
100
264
463
28
855 $3,000
52,000 $3,000
$2.000
'Percent of Total Labor Hours 11.7% 30.9% 54.2Y° 3.3°h
SUBTOTAL LABOR COSTS $21,000 $35,640 $46,300 $1,680 562,100 $7,250 8173,220
TOTAL LABOR COSTS $173,220
G.L. =Glenn Lajoie
AA. =Alan Ashimine
M.D. =Michelle Dunn
G.A. =Graphic Artist
Note: All work will be performed al a "Not to exceed" wntract price, which will hewme the 5rm fixed price upon wmpletion d negotiations with the Client The total budge)
includes all miscellaneous costs for VaveUmileage, reproduUion, reimburseables, telephone, postal, tlelivery, reference materials antl incidental expenses. RBF will receive
payment eimer on a percentage basis using milestones or by monthly killing, as tleteimined by the Client. The RfiF projeU manager reserves the rght to make adjustments to staff
allocations as necessary wdhin Iha overall budget.
P169
City of Rancho Cucamonga • 43 • February 19, 2008
P170
STAFF REPORT ~ ~- ~
I~NG1NfSIiRING Dlih;\li'1'MHN'f
RANCHO
Date: April 16, 2008 C,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Romeo David, Associate Engineer '}~"~'
Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer~-r-f
Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $128,568.20 TO THE APPARENT LOW
BIDDER, MOBASSALY ENGINEERING INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE
OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,856.82, FOR THE BANYAN
STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO BERYL
STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
11763035650/1627176-0
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $128,568.20 to the apparent low bidder, Mobassaly
Engineering Inc. and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $12,856.82,
for the Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Carnelian Street to Beryl Street, to be funded
from Measure I Funds, Account No. 1176303-5650/1627176-0.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 25, 2008, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $171,394.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and
found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be
inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders
meet the requirements of the bid documents.
The Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Carnelian Street
consists of cold milling, asphalt concrete pavement, ARHM overlay,
installation of striping and raised pavement markers. The contract
working days to complete this construction.
submitted,
~luzri
City Manager/Community Development
MA:RD:SH/Is
to Beryl Street scope of work
adjust all utilities to new grade,
documents call for thirty (30)
Attachment
P171
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
ALMOND DR.
^ HILL E D
r IL50 AVE ~ 24TH ST
~ .f, w
_ N ST ^ a SUMMIT A
_ ~ HIGH DAVE a
MN ^~~° > 30
0
30 3
N ~~ Y VICTORI PARK N~
v B LINE D
s
HUR ST R w
m ~~^~ o ~y
FOOIrIT~HILL-BLVD II ~~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ io5o c ARROW oR 6
a Z ¢ o < < BNSF R
V = ~
Z ~ 6TH ST y a
w o
~ ~ ~ I I ~ v vi
4TH ST °z =
FROM CARNELIAN ST TO BERYL ST
THOMAS GUIDE
PAGE 572
cr~uw-cs
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BANYAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION N
FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO BERYL STREET x.r.s.
P172
BID SllMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 25, 2008 APPARENT LOW EIODER 3 J
BANYAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION ENGINEER'S Mobaua3y Ea(WeerivL Silvia Coaetmctioa
FROM CARNELL4N STREET TO BERYL STREET ESTIMATE Inc. Geat Brothers Iac. Iac.
NO QTY UNIT DF.eCRIPTION COST AMOUNT CO6T AMOUNT CO6T AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
CLEARING AND GRUBBING(INCLUDES ALL $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $3,$00.001 $J,500.00 $1],000.001 $1],000.00 $4,$00.001 $4,500.00
1. 1 L$ REMOVALS, AND MOBILIZATION AND GRADING
$12000 S6,OOD.OO $153.001 $],650.00 $100.001 $5,000.00 $186.851 $9,342.50
2. 60 ONS ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (R8 R)
$6,00 $22,194.00 $1.80 $6,658.20 S2.OOI $],398.00 51.691 $6,251.31
3. 3,699 SV COLD PLANE PER PLAN.
ADJUST GAS,WATER VALVE FRAME AND COVER 5200.00 53,200.00 $35.(1(1 $$60.00 SSO.OO $800.00 550.00 5800.00
4. 16 EA TO FINISH GRADE
ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX INCLUDING
PAVEMENT, PREPARATION, ROUTING AND DUST $100.00 5310,000.00 $91.00 $100,100.00 589.00 $92,400.00 $89.65 598,615.00
5. 1,100 ONS BLOTTER
510
000
00 $10
000.00 $3
500.00 500.00
$5 $3,000.001 53,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00
6. 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL ,
. , , ,
TRAFFIC SIGNING, STRIPING ANO PAVEMENT $0,000.00 $8,000.00 $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $2,950.00 52,950.00
7 1 LS MARKINGS PER PLAN, COMPLETE IN PLACE
000
00
$1 $2
000
00 $800
001 $1
600.00 $300.00 $600.00 $900.00 $1,800.00
8 2 EA INSTALLCONSTRUCTION SIGNS ,
. ,
. . ,
TOTALS $1]1,394.00 8128,Sfi8.20 5129,698.00 0129,768.81
p a. 5 6 7
BANYAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION Laird Coastructioa
FROM CARNELL4N STREET TO BERYL STREET Co. Inc. xerd e. xa er tae. All American Aa halt R.J. Noble Com m
UNIT I
NO
UNIT
DPSCRII'3'ION
COST AMOUNT COST AMOUAT C06T AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
CLEARING AND GRUBBING(INCLUDES ALL $11
858.06 $11,858.06 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $6,963.001 $6,963.00 $11,000.001 $11.000.00
1. 1 L$ REMOVALS, AND MOBILIZATION AND GRADING ,
2. 60 ON$ ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RSR) 5350.00 3],500.00 $160.00 $8,000.00 $140.001 $],000.00 $118.001 $5,900.00
3. 3,699 SY GOLD PLANE PER PLAN. 5195 $6.473.2$ SL65 $6,103.35 $3.001 $11,09].00 51.821 $6,]32.18
AOIUST GAS,WATER VALVE FRAME AND COVER
$50.00
5800.00
$25.001
$400.00
$165.00
$2,690.00
543.00
$688.00
4. 16 EA TO FINISH GRADE
ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX INCLUDING
PAVEMEM. PREPARATION, ROUTING AND DUST $90.00 $99,000.00 $92.00 $101,200.00 $91.00 $100,100.00 $91.00 $100,100.00
5. 1,100 ON$ BLOTTER
6. 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL E1,000.00 51,000.00 S4,000.OO 54,000.00 $5.000.00 55,000.00 $9,400.00 $9,900.00
TRAFFIC SIGNING, STRIPING AND PAVEMENT 83,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,096.651 $3,096.65 52,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,100.001 $3,100.00
7 7 LS MARKINGS PER PLAN, COMPLETE IN PLACE
8 2 EA INSTALL CONSTRUCTION SIGNS $]50.00 $1,500.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 5850.00 51,700.00 $550.00 $1,]00.00
TOTALS 8331,131.31 5332,000.00 5137,000.00 $138,020.18
Page 1
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENWG MARCH 25, 2008 8 9
BANYAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION Elite Bobcat Service
FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO BERYL STREET Inc. calmer Ea ineeria
UNIT
I BID UNIT
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
$7,290.00 $7,290.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00
CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL
1. 1 LS REMOVALS, AND MOBILIZATION AND GRADING
$150.00 $7,500.00 $159.00 $7,950.00
2. 50 TONS ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (R & R)
$2.00 $7,398.00 $1.91 $7,065.09
3. 3,699 SY COLD PLANE PER PLAN.
ADJUST GAS,WATER VALVE FRAME AND COVER $250.00 $4,000.00 $135.00 $2,160.00
4. 16 EA TO FINISH GRADE
ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX, INCLUDING
PAVEMENT, PREPARATION, ROUTING AND DUST $91.00 $100,100.00 $99.48 $109,425.00
5. 1,100 TONS BLOTTER
$7,250.00 $7,250.00 $7,822.00 $7,822.00
6. 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL
TRAFFIC SIGNING, STRIPING AND PAVEMENT $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $3,470.00 $3,470.00
7 1 LS MARKINGS PER PLAN, COMPLETE IN PLACE
$900.00 $1,800.00 $1,167.00 $2,334.00
8 2 EA INSTALL CONSTRUCTION SIGNS
TOTALS $138,138.00 ffi146,229.09
PI 73
Page 1
P174
STAFF REPORT ~-~ ~-~
ENGINEERING DEPARTD~fENT
Date: April 16, 2008 RANCHO
C,,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager
By: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent
Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE A CONTRACT AMENDMENT ASSIGNING CONTRACT
CO 92-011 FROM TRUGREEN LANDCARE TREE DIVISION TO WEST COAST
ARBORISTS FOR CITY-WIDE TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE BALANCE
OF THE 2007-2008 FISCAL YEAR, TO BE FUNDED FROM VARIOUS CITY
ACCOUNTS, AND AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR TO
EXTEND THE CONTRACT ON A MONTH-TO-MONTH BASIS THEREAFTER UNTIL A
NEW CONTRACT IS COMPETITIVELY BID AND AWARDED
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize a contract amendment assigning contract CO-
92-011 from TruGreen LandCare Tree Division to West Coast Arborists Inc. for city-wide tree maintenance
services for the balance of the 2007-2008 fiscal year, to be funded from various city accounts, and authorize
the Public Works Services Director to extend the contract on a month-to-month basis thereafter until a new
contract is competitively bid and awarded.
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
Effective April 1, 2008 West Coast Arborists, Inc. purchased certain assets of TruGreen LandCare's Tree
Division which included the existing City-wide Tree Maintenance Contract CO 92-011 with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. West Coast Arborists Inc. is requesting that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consent to the
assignment of the contract. The contract amendment will assign the existing contract for the balance of the
fiscal year, and the Council's authorization of the Public Works Services Director to extend the contract on a
month to month basis thereafter will allow the additional time, as needed, to seek competitive bids for a new
contract. The continuation of the tree maintenance contract will not occur until approval of the assignment and
execution of the contract amendment, as well as insurance and business license verification and approval.
Res ectfully Submitted,
C~CLfie-/
Dave Blevins
Public Works Maintenance Manager
DB:JB:jau
P175
STAFF REPORT ~ - '
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: April 16, 2008 C',,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II
Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND,
ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
IMPROVEMENTS FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES INFRASTRUCTURE DAY
CREEK STORM DRAIN AND BASIN LOCATED NORTH OF THE EXTENSION OF
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ,SUBMITTED BY
JTYINVESTMENT;LLC
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Rancho Etiwanda Estates Infrastructure Day Creek Storm Drain and
Basin have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council
accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize
the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Rancho Etiwanda Estates Infrastructure Day Creek
Storm Drain and Basin, located north of the extension of Day Creek Boulevard and west of
Etiwanda Avenue, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have
been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful
Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer: 1100 Avondale Rd., San Marino, CA 91108
Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 730329S
(Bond No.)
Accept: Maintenance Bond # 730329S
(Bond No.)
f~spe ully submitted,
Mahdi
Deput City Hager/Community Development
MA:TLV/rlc
$1,790,800.00
$179,080.00
Attachment(s)
~ ~~~
~__
-J- _ L--~ - yy~~...
_ CT
~~
~_
,~. ec
.f.. ~~ 1 r-i~m~i_
y
.r
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
~«
.~ ~ ~,
1 1~ •~~ A :~ ~ ry ~
It 1• _~, 1fr
II r:
~ ~~ 1 _, S L
f b ~ ~ .i ,~,~ I +
---.~.___=l_-- _. _ . ~.Y~ .
NORTH »> 1 "= 1000'
TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda Estates
EXHIBIT: Viciluty Map
_ gsi~..
F
c~
_~~
V
rn
P177
RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~' O g~
A RESOLUTION OF THE,CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC 'IMPROVEMENTS FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA
ESTATES INFRASTRUCTURE DAY CREEK STORM DRAIN
AND BASIN AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Rancho Etiwanda
Estates Infrastructure Day Creek Storm Drain and Basin have been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
complete.
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date: April 16, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development
By: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
Subject: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE OLD TOWN PARK RENOVATION PROJECT FROM
BRAUGHTON CONSTRUCTION INC., AS COMPLETE, AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND;
AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE BOND.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council accept as complete, the Old Town Park Renovation Project, located at 10033
Feron Boulevard, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City
Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS
On November 7, 2007, the City awarded a contract to Braughton Construction, Inc., for the Old
Town Park Renovation Project. Park renovations included the complete removal and replacement
of the tot lot equipment as well as installation of ramps and new resilient surfacing to provide
accessibility; modifications to the concrete walkways at the park to incorporate ADA standards; the
replacement of the existing half basket ball court with a full size court; the addition of a horse shoe
pit; as well as, necessary landscape and irrigation modifications. The total contract amount for the
project, including change orders, is $545,208.64.
It is now therefore recommended that the City Council accept the improvements from Braughton
Construction, Inc. as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion for the
work and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a
Maintenance Bond for the project.
P178
M~'hdi luzri
Deputy ity Manager/Community Development
P179
RESOLUTION NO. ~ $° O91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE OLD TOWN PARK
RENOVATION PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Old Town Park
Renovation Project, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino.
P180
-~
.~
~~-~~'>
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
FIRE PROTECTION D I S T R I C T
Staff Report
DATE: April 16, 2008
TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief
BY: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: ADOP110NOFARESOLUTIONDECL,4RINGANNEXAIIONOFTERRffORY(DOUGLAS&
LINDAANDRESEN -APN 0201-04,345-ANNEXATION NO.88-08-1) TO AN EXISTING
COMMUNITY FACILf1lES DISTRICT, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING
SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIALTAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS
RECOMMENDATION
Consideration of adoption of a resolution making determinations and authorizing the submittal of
the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed (Douglas &
Linda Andresen, Annexation No. 88-08-1) to an existing Community Facilities District and calling
a special election.
BACKGROUND
Douglas & Linda Andresen have submitted a proposal to build a single family residence located
at 9991 Snowdrop Rd. and is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex to the existing
Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1 in order to mitigate the development's impact upon
fire protection services.
On March 19, 2008, the Board initiated formal annexation proceedings by adopting a resolution
approving a boundary map (Exhibit "A") of the territory proposed to be annexed and the
Resolution of Intention to annex APN 0201-043-45 into the existing CFD 88-1. This resolution,
among other things, declared the intention of the Board of Directors to levy a special tax within
the territory proposed to be annexed to finance fire protection and suppression services and
setting a public hearing regarding the proposed annexation to be held on April 16, 2008.
Through adoption of this resolution before the Board this evening, the Board will accomplish the
followirig:
• Make certain determinations as set forth in the resolution
• Call for a special election to be conducted on April 23, 2008
• Authorize submittal of the levy of the special tax to qualified electors
P181
Annexation of Territory to an Existing CFD No. 88-1
April 16, 2008
Page Two
ANALYSIS
The annexation of APN 0201-043-45 into CFD 88-1 will satisfy the conditions of development
relating to mitigating impacts upon fire protection services. Douglas & Linda Andresen, property
owners, are in full support of the annexation and are the sole owners of the property being
annexed. The Registrar of Voters has certified there are less than twelve (12) registered voters
residing within the territory to be annexed. Therefore, the election will be a landowner's vote,
the landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof of land within the territory proposed to
be annexed. Douglas & Linda Andresen have executed a "Consent and Waiver" of time frames
relating to the election. Exhibit "A" of the Resolution sets forth the rate and method of
apportionment of the special tax proposed to be levied within the territory to be annexed which
is consistent with the special tax levied upon all territory currently within CFD No. 88-1.
At the special election to be held on April 23, 2008, the landowners will cast their vote ballot(s).
The Board Secretary will then canvas the ballot(s). At the next Board meeting the Board will
consider adopting the resolution declaring the election results. If 2/3rds of the votes cast are in
favor of the levy of the special tax, the Board may declare the property to be annexed.
A representative for the property owners will be present during the meeting should any
questions arise regarding these proceedings. The Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing
has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin.
Respectfully submitted,
~~1~~/~~
Peter M. Bryan
Fire Chief
Attachments
I:\Clerical\Word Processing Docs\Staff Reports\P.nnexations\Call for Special Election for Annex 88-08-1.doc
P182
RESOLUTION NO. FD 08- O/y
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 88-08-1) TO AN EXISTING
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 88-1 ), CALLING A
SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE
LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS
WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS (the "Board of Directors") of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (the "Fire Protection District"), RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has
previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory
to an existing community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of
the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof (the "Act"). The existing Community Facilities
District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (the "District"); and,
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District, the extent
of the territory to be annexed (the "Annexation Area"), the furnishing of certain public services and all other
related matters has been given; and,
WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or
more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property
owners representing more than one-half (1 /2) or more of the area of land within the Annexed Area or within
District; and,
WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve (12) persons registered to vote within the
Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the
required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors
as authorized by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this Board of Directors that:
A. all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and
specifically the provisions of the Act;
B. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the
ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors
shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as
of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for
each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area;
C. the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to
the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot
arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation
Area;
P183
Resolution No. FD 08-
Page 2 of 6
D. the Secretary, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a
date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of any resolution annexing the Annexation
Area to the District; and
E. the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within
the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the Fire Protection
District as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation Area.
SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA The boundaries and parcels of land in the
Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and
expenses for the public facilities and services described in Section 4 below are generally described as
follows:
All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is
shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled
"Boundary Map of Community Facilities District No. 88-1 Annexation No. 88-08-1 Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the
"Annexation Map'), a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain
open for public inspection.
SECTION 4. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services that are authorized to be financed from
the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are certain services which are in addition to those
services required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing services already available. A
general description of the services authorized to be financed by the District is as follows:
The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and
repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services.
The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses
necessary to provide such services.
The same types of services which are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of
special taxes levied within the District are the types of services proposed to be financed from the special
taxes proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible such services shall be
provided in common with District and the Annexation Area.
SECTION 5. SPECIAL TAX Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the
approval of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for such services
required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real
property in the Annexation Area will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For
particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the
attached and incorporated Exhibit "A" which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to
allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the
special tax that such person will have to pay.
The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be
subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for
ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this Board of Directors may, by resolution, establish and adopt an
alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the
P184
Resolution No. FD 08-
Page 3 of 6
County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District.
SECTION 6. SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES Pursuant to and in compliance with
the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this Board of Directors hereby establishes the
following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the
Revised Annexation Area as described in Section 5 above:
A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes section in Section 5. above.
B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to the specific
applicable purposes set forth in Section 5. above.
C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of the special taxes
levied within the District shall be deposited.
D. The Fire Chief or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually
file a report with the Board of Directors as required pursuant to Government Code Section
50075.3.
SECTION 7. ELECTION The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to
the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner
having one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed
territory. The special election shall be held on the 23rd day of APRIL, 2008, and said election shall be a
special election to be conducted by the Secretary (hereinafter "Election Official"). If the proposition for the
levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the
proposition, the special tax maybe levied as provided for in this Resolution and the Board of Directors may
determine that the Annexation Area is added to and part of the District.
SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election
shall generally be as follows:
PROPOSITION A
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1,
AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY
Shall Community Facilities District No. 88-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on "Boundary Map of
Community Facilities District No. 88-1 Annexation No. 88-08-1, Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map")
pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the "Special Tax
Formula") set forth in Resolution No. FD 07-028 to finance authorized services and
administrative expenses?
P185
Resolution No. FD 08-
Page 4 of 6
SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "YES" shall be
counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square
after the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition.
SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Election Official is herebyauthorized to take anyand
all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all
services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services
shall include, but not be limited to the following:
A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of
the election.
Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots, tally sheets and other necessary
forms.
C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. ,
D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law.
E. Receive the returns of the election.
F. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of
the returns.
G. Canvass the returns of the election.
H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election.
Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred
as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election
officials.
J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election
in the manner and form as required by law.
P186
Resolution No. FD 08-
Page 5 of 6
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , 2008.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, Secretary
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said
Board held on the _ day of 2008.
Executed this _ day of 2008 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, Secretary
P187
Resolution No. FD 08-
Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT "A"
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
ANNEXATION NO. 88-08-1
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES
FISCAL YEAR 2007/08
TAXING CLASSIFICATION
1. D EVELOPED PROPERTY
A . Residential Class I
(more than 3590 SF)
B . Residential Class II
(3077 to 3589 SF)
C . Residential Class III
(2564 to 3076 SF)
D . Residential Class IV
(2308 to 2563 SF)
E . Residential Class V
(2051 to 2307 SF)
F. Residential Class VI
(1795 to 2050 SF)
G . Residential Class VII
(less than 1795 SF)
C ommercial/Industrial Property
2. APPROVED PROPERTY
SPECIAL TAX LEVY
FISCAL YEAR 2007/08
$433.19
$333.87
$265.66
$232.16
$201.03
$183.10
$165.13
$666.54 per acre or $0.059
per square foot or building
area, whichever is greater.
$200.00 per lot or
parcel
3. VACANT PROPERTY
SF =Square Feet
$10.00 per acre
P188
G
T H E C I T Y O F
r
RANChO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: April 16, 2008
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director
BY: Rina Leung, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE
ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA
DISPENSARIES IN ALL LAND USE ZONES WITHIN THE CITY AND TO ADD
CHAPTER 17.44 TO TITLE 17 (THE DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
RECOMMENDATION: Since the City Attorney's office completed researching case law as it
relates to medical marijuana dispensaries, it is recommended that the City Council adopt
immediately upon introduction an Ordinance to prohibit the establishment andlor operation of
marijuana dispensaries in the City and to allow for the addition of a new chapter to Title 17 (the
Development Code).
BACKGROUND: The City Council held various meetings regarding medical marijuana
dispensaries in the City. The following is a chronology of City Council meeting dates as they
relate to this item.
Previous City Council Meetings regarding Medical Marijuana Dispensaries:
• March 21, 2007: The City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 776, prohibiting the
establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries in any zone of the City for a period of 45-
days.
• April 18, 2007: The City Council was provided with a status report that summarized the
major legal, governmental, and enforcement issues that are associated with medical
marijuana. A copy of the staff report has been attached to provide the City Council with
background information regarding this proposal.
• May 2, 2007: The City Council approved an Interim Ordinance prohibiting the establishment
of medical marijuana dispensaries to allow sufficient time to study these uses.
ANALYSIS/FACTS FOR FINDING: As discussed in the April 18, 2007 report, there are a
considerable number of adverse secondary effects linked to medical marijuana dispensaries.
P189
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES ORDINANCE
April 16, 2008
Page 2
Notwithstanding, the fundamental conflict between Federal and State law, police agencies
throughout the state report increased criminal and other undesirable activity in and around these
uses, including but not limited to illegal narcotic transactions, loitering, and increased potential
for personal and property crimes (e.g., burglary and robbery). The California Police Chief's
Association has compiled an extensive report detailing the negative secondary effects
associated with medical marijuana dispensaries.
During the course of research/studies conducted by the City Attorney's office within the last
year, more cities have adopted Ordinances prohibiting medical marijuana uses. Furthermore,
the City Attorney's office cited that the City of Anaheim's Ordinance, which prohibited medical
marijuana dispensaries, has been upheld by the Orange County Superior Court. Therefore, the
legal climate is more favorable for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to prohibit medical marijuana
dispensaries outright.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The project is deemed to be exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b) (3), which
applies only to projects that have a potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.
In this instance the interim ordinance is to prohibit the establishment and/or operation of medical
marijuana dispensaries. Therefore, there can be no potential for causing a significant
environmental effect.
CONCLUSION: Adoption of the attached Ordinance prohibits the establishment and operation
of medical marijuana dispensaries in all zones in the City. If the City Council approves the
Ordinance, then the proposed addition of Chapter 17.44 of the Development Code would then
be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review prior to final adoption and incorporation into
the Municipal Code.
Respectfully submitted,
`~;~,~
f~1
James R. Troyer, AICP
Planning Director
JRT/RL/Is
Attachments: City Council Staff Report dated April 18, 2007
Draft Ordinance No.
P190
Staff Report
DATE: April 18, 2007
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director
BY: Michael Diaz, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: REPORT ON INTERIM ORDINANCE PROHIBITING MEDICAL MARIJUANA
DISPENSARIES IN ALL LAND USE ZONES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA.
RECOMMENDATION: As required by Government Code Section 65858, the purpose of this
report is to update the Council on recent developments on medical marijuana dispensaries and
the City's further review of the issue to, determine a permanent policy on dispensaries. Staff
recommends the City Council approve and file the report.
BACKGROUND:
On March 21, 2007 the City Council approved an urgency interim ordinance establishing a
temporary prohibition on the establishment and/or operation of medical marijuana dispensaries
within any land use district of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The interim ordinance is valid for
a period of 45 days. During the March 21, 2007 meeting, the City Council expressed its interest
in establishing the urgency ordinance to provide sufficient time to consider how the City could
proactively address the issue of medical marijuana dispensaries within the City limits.
Moreover, the Council found that there was an immediate threat to public safety, health, or
welfare,. in that that the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries before appropriate
procedures, development standards and regulations were in enacted would result in adverse
impacts to surrounding development and the welfare of the general public.
The urgency interim ordinance is set to expire on May 6, 2007. A public hearing on the matter
will be held on May 2, 2007, at which time the City Council will have the option to extend the
interim zoning ordinance for an additional time period of 10 months and 15 days.
DISCUSSION
The subject of medical marijuana dispensaries is complex. The following is a summary of the
major legal, governmental, and enforcement issues associated with the use.
Federal and State Law Conflicts
Federal and state laws continue to be in conflict. More specifically, the issue of medical
marijuana is clouded by the conflicting and uncertain legal status of federal and state legislation
CITY COUNCIL STAFF R~rORT
UPDATE REPORT ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA INTERIM ORDINANCE
April 18, 2007
Page 2
(i.e., the Federal Controlled Substances Act and the State of California approved
Proposition 215), which has yet to be fully resolved. Under federal law, the manufacturing,
delivery, or possession of marijuana is prohibited. However, in 1996, California voters passed
Proposition 215, also known as the Compassionate Use Act, which removed criminal penalties
for the personal use, possession, and cultivation of medical marijuana by patients that have a
physician's recommendation.
In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld federal authority over marijuana, even in states where
its use for medical purposes is legal. More specifically, the U.S: Supreme Court ruled that
Congress (i.e., the federal government) has the power to prohibit the local possession,
cultivation and use of marijuana. Interestingly, the Supreme Court did not go so far as to
invalidate California law permitting the medicinal use of marijuana, and no appellate court has
as yet invalidated the California law. What has resulted is a substantial controversy over the
validity of state law permitting medicinal use of marijuana when federal authorities may legally
raid medical marijuana dispensaries, shut them down, and prosecute those persons dispensing
or using marijuana inside them. The Supreme Court's decision has cast a cloud of uncertainty
over the Compassionate Use Act.
As a result, there are several cases pending in California (both in State and federal courts).
Recent experiences encountered by the City of West Hollywood illustrate the tension between
the Federal and local governments resulting from the enforcement of federal law by federal
agents. In March of 2007, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court ruled against a woman who sought to
use marijuana to treat scoliosis and a brain tumor. Until a definitive ruling is achieved in the
pending cases, a clear approach on how to address and/or regulate medical marijuana
dispensaries will likely remain elusive for the meantime.
Actions by other Jurisdictions
California cities and counties have reacted differently to the conflicting laws. A large number of
cities have enacted moratoriums to study the issue and determine whether they should regulate
or prohibit dispensaries within their corporate boundaries. In 2003, the State Legislature
created guidelines (SB 420) for carrying out the medical marijuana law, but local officials across
the state still struggle with how to control the dispensaries. For example, larger California cities
such as Oakland, Berkeley, West Hollywood, have chosen to regulate this use and limit the
number of dispensaries allowed.
Local cities and counties that have or intend to adopt moratoriums include the cities of
Claremont, Montclair, and Riverside County. Moreover, the Counties of San Diego and San
Bernardino filed a lawsuit against the State alleging the State law (California Compassionate
Use Act) is unconstitutional because it is preempted by federal law. Staff is in the process of
reviewing the approach taken by several jurisdictions that ban or regulate medical marijuana
dispensaries in their communities. Since the City of Rancho Cucamonga does not have
established standards in effect, staff believes the interim zoning regulation is the appropriate
approach to take until zoning standards can be developed and enacted.
Meanwhile, advocates for patients who use prescribed marijuana to ease pain related to
numerous ailments from glaucoma to cancer argue that cities should work to regulate, rather
than ban, medical marijuana dispensaries altogether.
Enforcement Issues
P191
There are no marijuana dispensaries currently operating within the city limits of Rancho
Cucamonga. The closest known dispensary was one that recently shut down by court order in
CITY COUNCIL STAFF h~PORT
UPDATE REPORT ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA INTERIM ORDINANCE
April 18, 2007
Page 3
the City of Claremont. In Claremont, medical marijuana dispensaries are not addressed by the
Land Use and Development Code, and the business was opened without benefit of a business
license. Legal actiori was necessary to enforce compliance with City regulations.
Since Proposition 215 took effect, police departments in several California cities have reported
problems taking place near medical marijuana dispensaries (or, so called "cannabis clubs").
The general consensus of police agencies with medical marijuana dispensaries in their service
area is that often there is criminal and other undesirable activity. Some of the major negative
and/or secondary impacts of dispensaries as identified by police agencies (including the
California Police Chiefs Association report), are listed below:
• Fundamental conflict between federal and state law.
• Illegal narcdtic transactions -street dealers selling marijuana at lower prices to entice
patients from dispensaries.
• Non-residents coming into a City to purchase marijuana.
• Negative impacts to adjacent residential neighbors and businesses -complaints about
individuals (adults and juveniles) congregating/loitering in and around the dispensary.
• The problem of patients selling to non-patients.
• Increased potential for personal and property crimes (e.g., burglary and robbery) in
attempts to obtain marijuana.
• Increased vehicle traffic.
• Individuals observed in public that are under the influence.
In light of the potential problems associated with medical marijuana uses as listed above, the
threat to the public health and safety and welfare continues to be real and immediate. Staff
believes that without appropriate standards in place no approvals and/or permits should be
issued for medical marijuana uses.
CONCLUSION:
Given the complexity of medical marijuana issue, and the immediate threat to the public's
health, safety, and welfare presented by having no development standards in place, staff plans
to provide Council with a recommendation to extend the interim zoning ordinance for another 10
months and 15 days. Without being able to extend this ordinance in order to complete such
preemptive planning, there is a current and immediate threat to the public health and safety
presented by the possibility that such anon-regulated use may commence without effective
regulation. During the time extension staff will continue to monitor the issues and work to
develop a permanent policy on dispensaries for Council consideration and action.
Respectfully submitted,
.`
Jame R. Troyer, AICP
Planning Director
P192
JRT:MD\Is
P193
ORDINANCE NO. 79~
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADDING
CHAPTER 17.44 TO TITLE 17 (THE DEVELOPMENT
CODE) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE, PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT AND
OPERATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES
IN ALL ZONES, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY
THEREOF
A. Recitals.
(i) The People of the State of California approved Proposition 215, which was
codified as California Health and Safety Code § 11362.5 and entitled the
Compassionate Use Act of 1996 ("the Act").
(ii) The Act prohibits the provisions of law making unlawful the possession or
cultivation of marijuana, from applying to a qualified patient, or to a patient's primary
caregiver, who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the personal medical use of the
patient upon the recommendation of a physician, and also prohibits the criminal
prosecution or punishment of a physician for having recommended marijuana to a
patient for medical purposes.
(iii) Thereafter, the State Legislature enacted Senate Bill 420 (the "Medical
Marijuana Program"), codified as California Health and Safety Code § 11362.7, et seq.,
which requires the State Department of Health Services to establish and maintain a
voluntary program for the issuance of identification cards to qualified patients and
primary caregivers, and prohibits the arrest of a qualified patient or a primary caregiver
with a valid identification card for the possession, transportation, delivery, or cultivation
of medical marijuana.
(iv) One purpose of the Act and the Medical Marijuana Program is "[t]o
encourage the Federal and State governments to implement a plan to provide for the
safe and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need of
marijuana...."
(v) Neither the Federal nor the State government has implemented a specific
plan "to provide for the safe and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in
medical need of marijuana," leaving cities with a lack of direction about how the Act is
intended to be implemented, particularly in regard to distribution of medical marijuana
through dispensaries.
(vi) The Medical Marijuana Program provides additional statutory guidance for
medical marijuana use and cultivation, but it does not explicitly address the role of
dispensaries, nor does it require that cities provide for or allow the establishment and/or
operation of medical marijuana dispensaries.
11231-0001\]046240v1.doc
P194
(vii) Notwithstanding the passage of the Act and the Medical Marijuana
Program, the possession for sale and distribution of marijuana is prohibited by the
Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 841, and California Health and Safety Code
§11359.
(viii) California law does not provide for the sale or distribution of marijuana by
medical marijuana dispensaries to a primary care giver, a qualified patient or a person
with an identification card, as those terms are defined in California Health and Safety
Code §11362.7.
(ix) The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code currently does not restrict the
existence or operation of medical marijuana dispensaries in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
(x) Medical marijuana dispensaries have been established in numerous
locations in California, and as a consequence, local agencies have reported negative
secondary effects on the community, which effects include, illegal drug activity and drug
sales in the vicinity of dispensaries; robbery of persons leaving dispensaries; driving
under the influence of a controlled substance by persons who have obtained marijuana
from a dispensary; persons acquiring marijuana from a dispensary and then selling it to
a non-qualified person; burglaries and robberies; and an increase in vacancies in the
commercial areas in the vicinity of such businesses.
(xi) The California Police Chiefs Association has compiled an extensive report
detailing the negative secondary effects associated with medical marijuana
dispensaries. The City Council hereby finds that the report, a complete copy of which is
on file in the City Clerk's Office, contains persuasive anecdotal and documented
evidence that medical marijuana dispensaries pose a threat to public health, safety and
welfare.
(xii) California Health and Safety Code §11362.5(b)(2) expressly provides that
nothing in the Act shall be construed to supersede legislation prohibiting persons from
engaging in conduct that endangers others, nor to condone the diversion of marijuana
for non-medical purposes.
(xiii) The Council hereby finds that, because of the inconsistency between
State and Federal law relating to the possession, sale and distribution of marijuana, and
because of the documented threat to public health, safety and welfare, it is in the best
interests of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the City prohibit the
establishment and operation of medical marijuana dispensaries within any and all zones
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(xiv) This Ordinance is enacted pursuant to California Health and Safety Code
§§ 11362.5(b)(2) and 11362.83, and the City's police power as granted broadly under
Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, in order to promote the health, safety
and welfare of the residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
2
11231-0001\1046240v1.doc
P195
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Anew Chapter 17.44 is hereby added to Title 17 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, to read as follows:
"Chapter 17.44
MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES
Section 17.44.010 Purpose and Findings.
The City Council finds that Federal and State laws prohibiting the
possession, sale and distribution of marijuana would preclude the lawful
opening and operation of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries sanctioned by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and in order to serve public health,
safety, and welfare of the residents and businesses within the City, the
declared purpose of this chapter is to prohibit the operation or
establishment of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries within the City, as
provided in this chapter.
Section 17.44.020 Definitions.
The following terms and phrases, whenever used in this chapter, shall be
construed as defined in this section:
A. Identification Card: is a document issued by the State
Department of Health Services which identifies a person authorized to
engage in the medical use of marijuana and the person's designated
primary caregiver, if any.
B. Medical Mariiuana: is marijuana used for medical purposes
where that medical use is deemed appropriate and has been
recommended by a physician who has determined that the person's health
would benefit from the use of marijuana in the treatment of cancer,
anorexia, AIDS, chronic paid, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or
any other serious medical condition for which marijuana is deemed to
provide relief as defined in California Health and Safety Code §
11362.7(h).
C. Medical Mariiuana Dispensary or Dispensary: is any facility
or location where medical marijuana is made available to and/or
distributed by or to three or more of the following: a qualified patient, a
person with an identification card, or a primary caregiver. Each of these
3
11231-0001\1046240v1.doc
P196
terms is defined herein and shall be interpreted in strict accordance with
California Health and Safety Code §§11362.5 and 11362.7, et seq. as
such sections may be amended from time to time.
D. Primary Care Giver: is the individual, designated by a
qualified patient or by a person with an identification card, who has
consistently assumed responsibility for the housing, health, or safety of
that patient or person.
E. Physician: is an individual who possesses a license in good
standing to practice medicine or osteopathy issued by the Medical Board
of California or the Osteopathic Medical Board of California and who has
taken responsibility for an aspect of the medical care, treatment,
diagnosis, counseling, or referral of a patient and who has conducted a
medical examination of that patient before recording in the patient's
medical record the physician's assessment of whether the patient has a
serious medical condition and whether the medical use of marijuana is
appropriate.
F. Qualified Patient: is a person who is entitled to the
protections of California Health and Safety Code §11362.5, but who does
not have an identification card issued by the State Department of Health
Services.
Section 17.44.030 Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for any person or entity to own, manage,
establish, conduct, or operate any Medical Marijuana Dispensary, or to
participate as an employee, contractor, agent or volunteer, or in any other
manner or capacity, in any Medical Marijuana Dispensary, in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
Section 17.44.040 Use or Activity Prohibited by State or Federal
Law.
Nothing contained in this chapter shall be deemed to permit or
authorize any use or activity which is otherwise prohibited by any State or
Federal law."
Section 2. Existing Nonconforming Uses. Any Medical Marijuana
Dispensary existing within the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the effective date of this
ordinance shall cease operations forthwith.
Section 3. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid
by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any
preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and
words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
4
11231-0001\1046240v1.doc
P197
Section 4. Savings Clause. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance nor the
repeal of any other ordinance of this City shall in any manner affect the prosecution of
any violation of any City ordinance or provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, committed prior to the effective date hereof, nor be construed as a waiver of any
license or penalty or the penal provisions applicable to any violation thereof.
Section 5. Penalty. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or
corporation to violate any provision or fail to comply with any of the requirements of this
Ordinance. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provisions of this
Ordinance or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a
misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by fine not exceeding one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not exceeding six (6) months, or by
both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every person, firm, partnership, or
corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any
portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance is
committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership or corporation, and
shall be deemed punishable therefore as provided in this Ordinance.
Section 6. Urgency. The City Council finds that it is necessary, for the
immediate preservation of the public health, safety and welfare, that this Ordinance take
effect immediately. As more fully described in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance, it
is necessary that this Ordinance take effect immediately in order to avoid situations that
have been identified by various public agencies throughout the State of California as
adverse and dangerous secondary effects arising from or associated with the operation
of medical marijuana dispensaries. These adverse secondary effects include, but are
not limited to, the commission of crimes against persons leaving the vicinity of
dispensaries, illegal drug activity in the vicinity of dispensaries, persons driving vehicles
under the influence of controlled substances obtained from dispensaries, and sales of
marijuana to non-qualified persons. The immediate enactment of this Ordinance is
further required by the lack of any regulations applicable to the operation of medical
marijuana dispensaries within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Any delay in adopting
the prohibition against medical marijuana dispensaries contained in this Ordinance
would unnecessarily cause an immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare
of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, the City Council adopts
this Ordinance as an urgency ordinance, effective immediately.
Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
5
11231-0001\1046240v1.doc
P198
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of
2008.
Mayor
I, Debbie Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify
that the foregoing urgency Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of
2008, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga
6
11231-0001\1046240v1.doc
P199
Staff Report
DATE: April 16, 2008
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director
BY: Thomas Grahn. AICP. Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
DRAFT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-2009
DRC2008-00217 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of the
federally required Annual Action Plan, which includes the preliminary selection
of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,013,150.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing and take public testimony
regarding the application for funding and direct staff to prepare the final 2008-2009 Annual
Action Plan, to be brought back for adoption at a subsequent City Council meeting.
BACKGROUND: Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") funds are provided by the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") based on a formula that
considers census data, extent of poverty, and age of the housing stock. Based upon this
formula, the City will receive a grant allocation of $1,013,150, which is a $38,341 decrease from
our current program year funding (a decrease based on Congressional budget appropriations).
To be eligible for funding, activities must meet one of the two primary goals of the CDBG
program:
1. The development of viable, urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable
living environment; and
2. The expansion of economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and
moderate-income.
CDBG regulations require that at least 70 percent of all funds be directed to activities that
benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Of the activities proposed for the 2008-2009
program year, approximately 80 percent will benefit low- and moderate-income persons.
P200
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2008-00217 - 2008-2009 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (CDBG)
April 16, 2008
Page 2
ANALYSIS: Each year we receive applications for various activities that far exceed our funding
abilities. Because the funding of the City's CDBG program is limited by the allocation we
receive from HUD, and how we distribute these funds is codified in Federal regulations, the City
simply cannot fund all application requests. Because of the decrease in CDBG funding, no new
activities are recommended for funding for the 2008-2009 program year. The following amounts
identified in bold refer to the recommended funding amounts from CDBG entitlement funds.
Home Improvement: The City's Home Improvement Program has been in existence since 1990.
The program offers deferred payment loans up to $30,000 and grants up to $7,500 for
low-income, owner-occupied, single-family, and mobile homes. Since the program's inception,
we have received an overwhelming number of requests for assistance from both the single-
family and mobile home community ~ Additionally, the Oldtimers Foundation Home Maintenance
Program provides minor and emergency repair grants to seniors, low- and low-moderate
income, and owner-occupied households. The recommended funding level for the Home
Improvement Program maintains funding, similar to the current program year, to accommodate
the large number of persons on the City's waiting list for services. Staff recommends funding
the City's Home Improvement Program $458,060 (including $350,000 in new funds and
$108,060 in prior year funds) and $10,000 to the Oldtimers Home Maintenance Program.
Capital Improvement: Includes funds to public facilities and for public improvements. No new
projects are recommended for funding. Capital Improvement projects includes the Calle Vejar
street improvement project, which received funds during the 06-07 program year; those funds
were reprogrammed to the Old Town Park project for the 07-08 program year. Funds for
Calle Vejar will be banked for the future construction of this street improvement project.
Proposed funding for Calle Vejar provides 28.9 percent ($212,550 out of $733,000) of the
funding necessary to complete this project. All other capital improvement activities are on-going
and carry over from prior years.
Wheelchair Ramps: Retrofitting of the existing intersection curbs to accommodate
handicapped persons; this activity occurs on a City wide basis. Staff recommends funding
this activity $30,000.
Sidewalk Grinding and Replacement: The grinding, repair, or replacement of damaged
and/or inaccessible sidewalks located in low income target neighborhoods. Staff
recommends funding this activity $22,000.
Calle Veiar: The construction of street improvements for Calle Vejar from
Hellman Avenue to Avenida Leon and Avenida Leon from Arrow Route to 150 feet north of
Calle Vejar. Funds will be banked for the future completion of this project. Staff
recommends funding this activity $212,550 (including $196,550 in new grant funds and
$16,000 in reprogrammed funds).
Historic Preservation:
Etiwanda Railway Station: The on-going preservation of this activity will be accomplished
through renovation for adaptive reuse as a museum and trailhead for the Pacific Electric
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2008-00217 - 2008-2009 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (CDBG)
April 16, 2008
Page 3
Inland Empire Trail, a 21-mile long regional trail. Staff recommends funding this activity
$50,000.
Chaffee-Isle House: The on-going preservation efforts at the Chaffey-Isle House. Funds
will be utilized to support interior improvements (interior improvements, finish wood work,
flooring, etc.). Staff recommends funding this activity $153,580. (Funding includes
$87,780 in prior year funds and $67,800 in reprogrammed funds).
Public Service: Under Federal regulations, cities may allocate up to 15 percent of their
entitlement to fund public service providers. Fifteen percent of our entitlement is $151,972, and
staff recommends funding public service groups a total of $151,970. The proposed funding will
support those sub-recipients who currently receive funding; no new public service activity
funding is recommended. Public service activities include: Graffiti Removal, Fair Housing,
Landlord Tenant Counseling, Homelessness and Food Assistance, Domestic Violence Shelter,
Senior, Youth At-Risk, and Literacy programs. Staff recommends funding these activities
$151,970.
CORRESPONDENCE: Notice of the public hearing and proposed funding allocations was
published in the Inland Vallee Daily Bulletin on March 17, 2008.
Respectfully submitted,
~ .,~
James R. Troyer, AICP
Planning Director
JT:TG/ge
P201
Attachments: Exhibit A - FY 2008-2009 Draft CDBG Funding
Exhibit B - FY 2008-2009 Draft Annual Action Plan
P2O2
_r,. .
Of°'°fY-20082009)-raft~F.untling'Analysis -
P.ioJect7ltle,`?s;°~°;v°~"F~"~7m'~_..,.r,
Atlministration
Requested;„-r°~..
$202,630.00
lpiior.°Year-
50.00
dRe rograrn
$0.00
~P,rogram Income,
$0.00
5:52 PM
Propnsad.,
$202,630.00
Apol 1, 2008
~a.".zTotal"Allocation
$202,630.00
Capital Improvement Programs $935,000.00 $101,780.00 $67,800.00 50.00 $298,550.00 $468,130.00
Home Improvement Programs $418,000.00 $108,060.00 50.00 SD.DD $360,000.00 $468,060.00
Public Service Programs $312,528.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $151,970.00 $151,970.00
Contingency $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total
FundmgiCaps;~°k;of Allocation? `r`."=."'.. ~~
AdminisValion (20%)
Possible Additional to Atlministration
Public Service Programs (15%)
Passible Additional to Puhlic Service
Footling a`°kr'flfiT,btel~itiv"ailatiteaPUnds~ `"".?: ~ ~.
Administration
Capital Improvement Programs
Home Improvement Programs
Puhlic Service Programs
LowlMod Percentage of Current Allocation
low/Mod Percentage of Total Allocation
Funding1Olfferences
Prior Year plus Reprogram Funtls
Difference Btwn Requested 8 Allocation
7lctlvltie's,>A.~;~i. k°`1.`z~_,_ r5~*,.. "'.-£
Sidewalk Grinding $1,868,158.00
20.0°.b
$0.00
15.0%
$2.50
15.7%
36.3°h
36.3%
11.8%
60.0%
84.3%
$277,640.00
$855,008.00
$22,000.00 $209,840.00
00 $67,800.00
00 $0.00
00 51,013,150.00
,000.00 $1,280,190.00
,000.00
Wheelchair Ramps 530,000.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 530,000.00
Eliwenda Railway Station $50,000.00 $0.00 50.00 50.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
Chaffey-Isle House $100,000.00 $85,780.00 $67,800.00 $0.0~ 50.00 $153,580.00
Calla Vejer(Construction) $733,000.00 $16,000.00 $0.00 50.00 5196,550.00 $212,550.00
~'" :Subtotali=EC'a'pltel'Inipro`velilen( 5835,000.00 5101,760.00 567,800.00 50.00 5288,560.00 5488,130.00
Home Improvement Program $400.000.00 5108,Ofi0.00 $0.00 50.00 5350,000.00 5458,060.00
Oldtimers Foundation-HOme Maintenance $18.000.00 50.00 $o.oo $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
-'"~~ 'gubfotal~HomerlrnpiovertiiSdt 5418,000.00 5109,060.00 50.00 50.00 $360,004.00 5488,080.00
Graffiti Removal $22,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 522,000.00 $22,000.00
IFHMB-Fair Housing 522,153.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 511,680.00 $11,660.00
IFHMB-Landlord?enant $14,030.00 $0.00 $O.DO $O.DD $9,730.00 59,730.00
Foothill Family Sheller $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $4,870.00 $4,870.00
House of Ruth $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 57,400.00 $7,400.00
SOYA $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,810.00 $6,810.00
YMCA-Your Own Club $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $4,870.00 54,870.00
YMCA-Senior Transportation $25,000.00 50.00 $0.00 $o.DD $14,600.00 514,600.00
RC Community Services -Senior Programs $16,000.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 ~ 816.000.00 516,000.00
Northtown Collaborative $12,000.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 512,000.00 $12,000.00
RC Library-Back To Basics $10.000.00 $0.00 .. $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 510,000.00
Oldtimers Foundation -Senior Nutrition $30.000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,270.00 58,270.00
Camp Fire USA $13,400.00 $0.00 50.00 50.00 56,520.00 $6,520.00
Project Sister 59,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,400.00 $9 400.00
Hope Through Housing Foundation $15.000.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 54,870.00 54.870.00
Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,950.00 52,950.00
RC Community Services -Arrow Multi Service $11.050.00 $0.00 $O.DO 50.00 $0.00 50.00
Housing Action Resource Trust 577,195.00 50.00 $O.DO 50.00 $0.00 $0.00
~?°~°,,~.~h'~'~"s~:Subtotal=Public:Servtce -°a}~53A2,628.OD ,:;,;; x.,,,;550:00 °,," „-~.,~SO DO ~~.z..r+fi„'~A'$O.OO is;15Y,970;00 „ar.-2:rj15~1,970D4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
2008-2009 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
(JULY 1, 2008 To JUNE 30, 2009)
EXHIBIT B Draft-April 16, 2008
P204
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (HUD-424) ........................................................................1
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................4
RESOURCES AVAILABLE ....................................................................................................................4
FEDERAL RESOURCES ...........................................................................................................4
OTHER RESOURCES ..............................................................................................................5
LEVERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS .....................................................................................5
ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN ....................................................................................................... ..6
AFFORDABLE HOUSING ....................................................................................................... ..6
OBJECTIVE 1 -CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE-
FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK .................................................................... ..6
OBJECTIVE 2 -IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW- AND
MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE PRODUCTION OF LARGER
(3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS ................................................................................. ..7
OBJECTIVE 3 -PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE-
INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING....... ..8
OBJECTIVE 4 -INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-
INCOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE ............. ..8
OBJECTIVE 5 -REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS
ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING ............................................................................. 10
OBJECTIVE 6 -IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME
HOUSEHOLDS .......................................................................................................... 10
HOMELESS STRATEGIC PLAN ............................................................................................... 11
OBJECTIVE 7 -ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, AND PERSONS WITH
SPECIAL NEEDS, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS ...................................... 11
HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN .................................................................................................... 12
SPECIAL NEEDS .................................................................................................................. 12
OBJECTIVE 8 -PROVIDE NECESSARY REHABILITATION SERVICES TO SPECIAL NEEDS
POPULATIONS WITH EMPHASIS ON ASSISTING THE ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY.... 12
OBJECTIVE 9 -SUPPORT SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS
POPULATIONS ......................................................................................................... 12
SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN ............................................................................................ 13
NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ............................................................. 13
OBJECTIVE 10 -PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS, IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN LOW- AND
MODERATE-INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS, AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS,
SENIORS, AND THE HANDICAPPED ........................................................................... 13
OBJECTIVE 11 -ASSIST LOCAL PUBLIC AND NON-PROFIT SERVICE AGENCIES THAT
IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS AND
THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS ................................................................................... 13
OBJECTIVE 12 -ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND
STRUCTURES .......................................................................................................... 16
OBJECTIVE 13 -THE RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION OF PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL
VALUE FOR HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, AND AESTHETIC REASONS ......................... 16
OBJECTIVE 14 -PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE
CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE CDBG PROGRAM AND THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN...... 17
Cily of Rancho Cucamonga Page -
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P205
OBJECTIVE 15 -ALLEVIATE PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS THROUGH
THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION IN
IDENTIFIED TARGET NEIGHBORHOODS .....................................................................17
OBJECTIVE 16 -REVITALIZE AND UPGRADE HOUSING CONDITIONS; PREVENT AND
ELIMINATE BLIGHT AND BLIGHTING INFLUENCES; AND ELIMINATE CONDITIONS
DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ..............................18
OTHER ACTIONS ......................................................................................................................
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ..........................................................................................
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING ...............................................................
OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER SERVED NEEDS ........................................................
ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING ........................................
ACTIONS TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING ........................................
ACTIONS TO EVALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARDS ............................
ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POVERTY LEVEL FAMILIES ................................
ACTIONS TO DEVELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION ......
PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS ...............................................................................
MONITORING ...............................................................................................................
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................
APPENDIX "A" -EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....
....18
.....18
..19
21
.21
....21
...22
22
....22
.....22
22
23
1
APPENDIX "B"-SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5-YEAR AND 1-YEAR GOALS ...........................1
APPENDIX ..C.. _ ATTACHMENTS .........................................................................................................1
SUPPORTING MAPS: PROPOSED PROJECTS AND LOW/MOD INCOME ......................................1
SUPPORTING FORMS: FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE: GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL
NEEDS/NON-HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS .....................................1
LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS .........................................................................................1
CERTIFICATIONS ....................................................................................................................1
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - ii April 2008
Community Development Block Granl Program
2008-2009 Annual Aclion Plan
P206
APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (FORM HUD-424)
The Application for Federal Assistance will be inserted into the final report.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 1 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P207
INTRODUCTION
The Annual Action Plan provides a plan of investment and an outline of activities expected to be
undertaken during the 2008-2009 program year. The report identifies local objectives and priority
needs identified to implement the primary objective of the Community Development Block Grant
("CDBG") program, which is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent
housing, suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities, principally for persons
of low- and moderate-income.
RESOURCES AVAILABLE
~: FEDERAL RESOURCES
Community Development Block Grant
Federal funds available to the City are allocated through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development ("HUD")CDBG program. During the 2008-2009 program year, the City will receive an
entitlement allocation of $1,013,150, which is $38,341 less than fiscal year 2007-2008.
San Bernardino County Housing Authority
The San Bernardino County Housing Authority serves as the local housing authority for the region.
The Agency currently operates 170 Section 8 housing units and 16 public housing units located
within the City. Sources of funds available to City residents through the Housing Authority are
primarily limited to Section 8, Comprehensive Grant Improvement, and the Public Housing
programs.
County of San Bernardino Department of Community Development and Housing
The County of San Bernardino Department of Community Development and Housing ("CDH")
receives federal HOME Investment Partnerships Program ("HOME") funds to implement the HOME
Consortium, which the City joined in July 1995. In 1999 the City renewed their commitment to the
HOME Consortium by signing a 3-year Cooperation Agreement covering the period from
October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2002. The City renewed the 3-year agreement to cover the
period from October 1, 2002 to September 30, 2005. On March 30, 2005, the City signed a
Certificate of Interest to continue with a cooperative agreement for the next 3-year period; the
current agreement will expire on September 30, 2008.
The County operates four programs through the HOME Consortium that include the HOME
Homeownership Assistance Program ("HAP"), the HOME Tenant-Based Rental Assistance
("TBRA") program, the Affordable Housing Development Loan ("AHDL") program, and the HOME
Community Housing Development Organization ("CHDO") Program. The County allocation for the
HOME program totals $4,052,935.
The HAP, TRBA, and AHDL programs are discussed as specific activities in the Consolidated Plan.
The CHDO Set-Aside program is not identified and therefore warrants further discussion.
The CHDO program is funded through a mandatory Set-Aside from the HOME Consortium and
provides funds for affordable housing that is developed, sponsored, or owned by non-profits that
have been certified as CHDO's. The CHDO program functions as a source of funding for a variety
of projects including new construction and rehabilitation of residential structures. Funds are not
targeted to a specific area or project type within the County; however, recipient income cannot
exceed 80% of the County medium family income. Funds are available to eligible residents on a
first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the HOME Consortium, with
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 4 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P208
approximately $607,000 allocated to the CHDO program.
OTHER RESOURCES
City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
State law requires redevelopment agencies to set aside at least 20% of tax increment revenue for
increasing and improving the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing. Between
July 1, 2005, and June 30, 2010, approximately $67,131,198 will be generated by tax increment for
affordable housing. The tax increment allocation to the 20 Percent Set-Aside during the reporting
period is projected to be $19,834,227. The Redevelopment Agency's ("RDA") tax increment has
been pledged against several on-going projects, and therefore, there is little unobligated funding
available.
In July 1996, the RDA approved the sale of tax allocation bonds to provide permanent financing for
two community based non-profit organizations, National Community Renaissance ("National
CORE") and Northtown Housing Development Corporation ("NHDC"). On September 1, 1996, Tax
Allocation Bonds in the amount of $ 37.66 million were sold. Proceeds of the bonds will be allocated
in the following manner:
o A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with National CORE where $ 3.9
million will be provided annually for debt services and project reserves. Beginning year 6, if
the provision of Redevelopment Law that allows for the acquisition of existing units with
Housing Set-Aside funds has been extended beyond its current sunset, this $ 790,000 of the
annual pledge will be deposited into a "Future Project Reserves" fund for use in acquiring
additional apartment complexes within the Project Area. If a program is not developed, the
funds will be available for any RDA housing program.
o A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with NHDC where $ 1.5 million was
paid to NHDC on June 30, 1996, and again on December 30, 1996. An additional $ 5 million
in net bond proceeds were also paid to the NHDC. These bond proceeds will be used to
complete a portion of the capital improvement plan for the Northtown neighborhood that
includes continuing the development of infll housing on vacant lots, acquisition and
rehabilitation of existing absentee-owned housing. The annual pledge amount will be $ 1.4
million through the year 2025.
:: LEVERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS
The primary source of fund leveraging will occur through RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds in
public/private partnerships with non-profit housing development corporations such as National
CORE and the NHDC. Other potential sources for leveraging include HOME funds and Low-Income
Housing Tax Credits.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 5 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2D09 Annual Aclion Plan
P209
ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN
:: AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Program 1.1: Acquisition of existing multi-family units to be held forfuture affordable
housing stock.
Activity 1.1.1: This activity includes the acquisition of restricted, and previously unrestricted,
at-risk units. The National CORE, with pledge assistance from the RDA 20
Percent Set-Aside funds obtained replacement financing for several
complexes within the City. The National CORE owns and manages the
complexes, and the RDA monitors the affordability covenants checking
quarterly to ensure units are rented according to the agreement and the
occupants comply with established income categories.
Lead Agency: National CORE, with funding assistance by the Rancho Cucamonga RDA.
Geographic Location: Activities will primarily occur in the Redevelopment area, however, units may
be acquired citywide.
Resources: Bonds issued by the RDA and a loan from the California Housing Finance Authority
("CHFA") were used to provide long-term replacement financing for seven National CORE
affordable housing complexes. A 1996-97 RDA tax allocation bond issue provided approximately
$ 30 million for replacement financing. An annual pledge of $ 3.9 million of Agency Housing funds
provides bond debt service and project reserve funds.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: There are six existing apartment complexes, containing 1,262
total units with 670 units held as affordable. Monterey Village and Mountainside Apartments were
acquired in FY 95-96 and Sycamore Springs and Rancho Verde Apartments were acquired in FY
96-97. Heritage Pointe Senior Apartments, a 49 unit senior apartment complex, 100% of the units
as held as affordable, were acquired in FY 02-03. Woodhaven Apartments, a 117 unit apartment
complex, 100% of the units held as affordable, were acquired in FY 05-06. An additional 40 units,
100% held as affordable, are proposed at Rancho Verde Apartments and should be completed by
June 30, 2009.
S camore S rin s
240 . ...
96
Mountainside A artments 384 192
Montere Villa e A artments 224 112
Rancho Verde A artments 248 104
Herita a Pointe Senior A artments 49 49
Woodhaven A artments 117 117
Total 1,262 670
Program 1.2: Acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single-family homes.
Activity 1.2.1: The NHDC does not anticipate rehabilitating any units during the 2008-2009
program year. When rehabilitation does occur the NHDC is the
owner/developer of the rehabilitated lots, which are purchased with
assistance from the RDA.
This activity is part of the NHDC's First-Time Home Buyer program where
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 6 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Aclion Plan
P210
newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes are available to
low- and moderate-income home buyers in the Northtown neighborhood.
(See Objective 4, Activity 4.3.1.)
Activity 2.1.1: To increase the availability of affordable rental stock, the RDA, in conjunction
with local non-profit development agencies, will pursue the new construction
of affordable units in its existing target area. Emphasis has been placed on
the construction of units available to large families.
Lead Agency: National CORE, Workforce Homebuilders, and NHDC.
Geographic Location: Activities are focused in the RDA project area, but may occur citywide.
Resources: Private financing, HOME funds, Low-Income Tax Credits, and RDA 20 Percent Set-
Aside funds.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: This program includes two projects, Rancho Workforce
Housing and San Sevaine Villas. Rancho Workforce Housing was ajoint venture between National
CORE and Workforce Homebuilders. The joint venture obtained entitlements for the development
of a 166-unit multi-family housing complex, 131-units held as affordable. NHDC obtained
entitlements for a San Sevaine Villas, a 225-unit, 100% affordable multi-family housing complex. An
additiona140 units, 100% held as affordable, are proposed at Rancho VerdeApartments and should
be completed by June 30, 2009.
Program 2.2: Construction ofsingle-family infill development in low- and moderate-
income neighborhoods.
Activity 2.2.1: The NHDC constructs new homes on infill lots within the Northtown target
neighborhood. When lots are available, new homes are made available to
families with incomes between 80% and 90% of the area median income.
The NHDC is the owner/developer of the infll lots; however, these lots are
purchased with assistance from the RDA.
This program is also part of the NHDC's First-Time Home Buyer program
where newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes are
available to low- and moderate-income home buyers in the Northtown
neighborhood. (See Objective 4, Program 4.3, Activity 4.3.1.).
Lead Agency: NHDC, with funding assistance by the Rancho Cucamonga RDA.
Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood.
Resources: The NHDC leveraged RDA 20 Percent Set-Aside funds with subsidies from the
Affordable Housing Program and permanent first-mortgages from Home Loan Bank of San
Francisco.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: The NHDC was not able to obtain any lots for the
construction of any new single-family homes, and therefore does not does not plan on the
development of any homes during the program year.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 7 April 2008
Community Development alock Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan -
Program 2.1: Construction of affordable (multi-family) units.
P211
Activity 3.1.1: The Housing Authority routinely requests assistance from the City when
applying for Section 8 Housing Certificates and Vouchers for public housing
assistance. The City will continue to support these applications. The agency
currently operates 6,257 Section 8 units of which 170 are located within the
City. The agency also operates 16 public housing units and rents them to
qualified households at affordable rates.
Lead Agency: Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino.
Geographic Location: These programs are available citywide.
Resources: Federal housing funds.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: Annually support 16 public housing units and 170 Section 8
applications.
Program 3.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium Tenant-Based Rental Assistance
("TBRA") program.
Activity 3.2.1: The TBRA program is offered through the HOME Consortium and is
available to eligible residents. The program provides both a monthly rent
subsidy for very low-income special needs households and security deposit
assistance to households receiving a monthly rental subsidy from the San
Bernardino County Housing Authority. The County targets monthly rental
assistance to eligible households that include a disabled family member, and
they place a priority on providing security deposit assistance to families
experiencing "temporary" housing situations where the temporary housing or
shelter is either not suitable or not available as permanent housing.
Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino CDH, HOME Consortium.
Geographic Location: Available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's
participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $1,100,000 allocated to this
program; this includes $800,000 in monthly rental assistance and $300,000 in security deposit
assistance.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize this
program so that six households could receive assistance by June 30, 2009.
OBJECTIU,E 4:,INCREASE;HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR~LOW AND MODERATE-INCOME_
i HOME OWNERSHIP,_P,ARTICULARLY TIIROUGH;HOMEBUYERASSlSTANCE -
Program 4.1: Administer a City sponsored Home Buyer Program.
Activity 4.1.1: The RDA administers a Home Buyer program using down payment
assistance loans. The loan provides up to a maximum of $80,000, as a
silent second loan. The loan is forgiven if the buyer remains in the unitfor45
years.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 8 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
Program 3.1: Support applications by the Housing Authority of the County of San
Bernardino for future Section 8 and public housing assistance.
P212
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga RDA.
Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: RDA Set-Aside funds: $1,000,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2009, assist 10 homebuyers.
Program 4.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium Homeownership Assistance
Program ("HAP").
Activity 4.2.1: The HAP assists households earning less than 80% of the median family
income in the purchase of a home. The HAP is a silent second trust deed
program to assist low-income persons in becoming homeowners.
Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino CDH, HOME Consortium.
Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's
participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $1,000,000 allocated to this
program.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize this
program so that four households could receive assistance by June 30, 2009.
Program 4.3: Assist the NHDC First-Time Home Buyer Program.
Activity 4.3.1: The NHDC's First Time Home Buyer Program provides newly constructed
and/or rehabilitated single-family homes to low- and moderate-income
homebuyers in the Northtown neighborhood. NHDC does not plan the
construction of any new homes (Affordable Housing -Activity 2.2.1), or the
rehabilitation of any homes (Affordable Housing -Activity 1.2.1), which would
provide the homes necessary for this program. When lots are available,
newly constructed homes are typically sold to income-eligible homebuyers
earning between 80% and 90% of the area median family income.
When rehabilitated homes are utilized (Affordable Housing -Activity 1.2.1)
the rehabilitated homes are leased for atwo-year period at affordable rents
to families earning up to 60% of the area median family income. At the end
of the two year lease period, the tenant will be offered a purchase option if
they have demonstrated the ability to properly maintain and pay for the home
and can arrange financing for an affordable first mortgage. The NHDC plans
on the rehabilitation of one unit during the program year.
Lead Agency: The NHDC.
Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood.
Resources: The NHDC received a pledge amount from the RDA that they are able to use
accordingly to meet the goals of their affordable housing program.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: The NHDC was not able to obtain existing units for
rehabilitation, or lots for new construction, underthis program; therefore, there are no units planned
to be leased or sold during the program year.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page- 9 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
20D8-20D9 Annual Action Plan
P213
Program 5.1: Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and
mobile homes for extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income
homeowners.
Activity 5.1.1: The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement
Program available to eligible owner-occupied households, those earning less
than 80% of the area median family income. The program offers deferred
payment loans of up to $ 30,000 and grants of up to $ 7,500, including
emergency repair grants. The City runs this as a full service program and
not only lends the money, but secures contractors, oversees the work, and
maintains administration of the grants and loans rather than farming this
work out to the bank or homeowner. While this method requires additional
staff time, it is done to provide a high level of customer service and ensure
both consistent and efficient results.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.
Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds: $458,060.
(Funding includes $350,000 in new grant funds and $108,060 in prior year funds).
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2008, assist 40 households with incomes below
80% of the area median family income.
Program 5.2: Participate in the HOME Consortium Affordable Housing Development
Loan ("AHDL") Program.
Activity 5.2.1: This program provides a three (3) percent interest loan to acquire and/or
rehabilitate existing rental property that will then be made available to
qualifying tenants at affordable rents for a specified period. Funds may be
used for moderate rehabilitation efforts, with a maximum allowed of up to
$ 25,000 per unit. The HOME assisted units will be subject to specific rent
limits, and be available to low- and very-low income residents. This program
also provides funding for the refinancing and rehabilitation of multi-family
units.
Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino CDH, HOME Consortium.
Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's
participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $939,000 allocated to this
program.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: No known units are proposed for assistance during the 2008-
2009 program year. The City will work with the HOME Consortium to publicize this program in
Rancho Cucamonga.
., _ . .
OBJECTIVE'6 IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW-' AND MODERATE-INCOME
.
i HOUSEHOLDS ' '` _`
>. ~,
' ~. b o `' .~x z~ ''~"
Program 6.1~ Support applications of the Housing Authority of the County of San
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page- 10 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P214
Bernardino for their Annual Comprehensive Grant to improve living
conditions for public housing residents.
Activity 6.1.1: Each year the City has certified consistency of the Housing Authority's
Comprehensive Grant program with the Consolidated Plan. The City will
continue to do so for the Comprehensive Plan.
Lead Agency: Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino.
Geographic Location: This program will benefit residents citywide.
Resources: Federal housing funds.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: Annually support 16 public housing applications.
~: HOMELESS STRATEGIC PLAN
"OB;IECTIUE.Z; ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS„FAMILIES, AND PERSONS WITH SPECIAL;
NEEDS,A`ND~THOSEAT RISK~OF HOMELESSNESS{.~~~" ~ „~~, ~xt ,,, '' ,~'~~~~
Program 7.1: Continue to support of local homeless facilities and services.
Activity 7.1.1: The City supports a variety of organizations that provide immediate
assistance, advocacy, and short-term shelter to homeless individuals and
families. The City will continue to address priority needs, and will continue to
evaluate the provision of transitional shelter assistance. These agencies
include:
Foothill Family Shelter: Foothill Family Shelter operates a 90-day transitional shelter for homeless
families with children. Support services are provided to enable families to obtain independence and
permanent housing. They are located at 1501 West Ninth Street, Suite D, and at 230, 238, and 294
North San Antonio Avenue in Upland, CA 91786.
House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe,
self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness.
Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24-hour crisis
intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs.
House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711.
Inland Valley Council ofChurches- West End Hunger Program (BONA): SOVA offers a 5-day food
supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and
avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The PVCC
offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA
91761.
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.
Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds:
o Foothill Family Shelter: $ 4,870.
o House of Ruth: $ 7,400.
o SOVA: $ 6,810.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2009, assist the following:
o Foothill Family Shelter - 10 families.
o House of Ruth - 1,600 persons.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 11 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Aclion Plan
P215
o SOVA - 1,280 persons.
:: HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN
The City's goal is to develop a comprehensive homeless assistance plan that provides a
continuum of care with the purpose of ultimately assisting individuals in obtaining and retaining
permanent housing. As the first priority in the plan, the City intends to continue funding those
agencies that are able to provide the first line of defense in providing outreach and advocacy in
assisting individuals and families who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness. These activities
include the support of emergency shelter, shelter vouchers, food distribution, advocacy, and referral
services. The City will continue to fund landlord/tenant activities as a means of assisting those who
are at-risk of homelessness in keeping their homes. Additional assistance will be encouraged for
those agencies that provide longer-term transitional shelter and assist in the transition to permanent
housing opportunities.
~: SPECIAL NEEDS
Program 8.1: Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to eligible
households with emphasis on assistance to low-and moderate-income
seniors.
Activity 8.1.1: This program will complement the City's Home Improvement Program by
providing minor rehabilitation and emergency assistance to low- and
moderate-income residents and senior citizen households whose income
falls below 80% of the area median family income. Permitted home repairs
include minor plumbing, electrical, carpentry, and roof repairs. Residents
who are owner occupants are eligible to receive two visits, up to $ 300 per
visit, and in emergencies, the allowance of aone-time material charge for up
to $ 500. The Oldtimers Foundation is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue,
Fontana, CA 92335.
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.
Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds: $10,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2009, Oldtimers Foundation will assist 60 low-
and moderate-income households.
Program 9.1: Support special need services in areas where there are significant
under-served needs.
Activity 9.1.1: Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas
of physical fitness, recreational and educational development, mental health,
and emotional well-being.
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 12
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P216
Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, 11200 Base Line Road.
Resources: CDBG funds: $ 16,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2009, to have assisted 550 persons through
these activities.
:: SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN
Objectives 8 and 9, as stated above, identify actions the City intends to take over the next
program year to address the needs of persons who are not homeless, but have special needs.
~i NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
Program 10.1: Complete all necessary infrastructure and sidewalk improvements in
qualified target areas.
Activity 10.1.1: The City will fund the following public improvement projects:
o Calle Veiar: The construction of street improvements for Catle Vejar from Hellman Avenue to
Avenida Leon and Avenida Leon from Arrow Route to 150 feet north of Calle Vejar. Street
improvements will include: removal of the existing pavement, construct new pavement over
aggregate base, install streetlights, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ramps for disabled, and street
trees. When completed, the project will facilitate better drainage of the street and right-of-
way. Because insufficient funds are available to currently complete this project, the
identified funds will be banked for the future completion of these street improvements.
o Sidewalk Grinding and Replacement in Identified Target Neighborhoods: Involves the
grinding, repair, or replacement of sidewalks that are displaced and/or inaccessible.
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department
Geographic Location: Calle Vejar improvements will be carried out in CT 21, BG 2. Sidewalk
Grinding efforts may be carried out in all eligible neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6, & 7.
Resources: CDBG funds:
o Calle Vejar: $ 212,550.
(This includes $16,000 in reprogrammed funds and $196,550 in new funds).
o Sidewalk Grinding: $ 22,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2009, replace approximately 3,960 square feet of
sidewalk in eligible neighborhoods.
W .'d?. 'p F 4 3
OBJECTIVE 91 ASSIST LOCAL> PUBLIC AND NON PROFIT, SERVICE, AGENCIES THAT'.
IMPROVE'THE QUALITY OF~s""LIFE FOR<LOW AND MODERATE INCOME'PERSONS:--AND
THOSE WITHSPECIAL NEEDS ', * r~r:` ,~ r~ + ~~w~~, " ~ ~~~ +, ~ a~,7 ~'~
Program 11.1: Assist public service agencies that support groups in the highest
priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant
mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters,
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page- 13 April 2008
Community Development Block Granl Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P217
domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy
programs.
Activity 11.1.1: The City will continue to fund public service agencies that include:
Fair Housing: Fair Housing services that include education, counseling, mediation, and legal
referral. Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is located at 60 West 9t" Street, Upland,
CA 91786.
Landlord Tenant Mediation: Landlord/Tenantdlspute mediation services are provided by Inland Fair
Housing and Mediation Board.
House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe,
self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness.
Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter (up to 30 days), 24-hour crisis
intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs.
House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711.
Inland Valley Council of Churches- West End Hunger Program (BONA): SOYA offers a 5-day food
supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and
avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. SOVA is
located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761.
Rancho Cucamonga Fontana YMCA -Your Own Club: This program is targeted to the Northtown
neighborhood within CT 21, BG 6 & 7. YOC is designed to provide at-risk middle school aged youth
with fun, educationally enriching and challenging value-based after school alternatives in a safe and
enjoyable environment. Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA, is
currently located at 11200 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730.
Oldtimers Foundation -Senior Nutrition: The nutrition program is run from the Senior Center in
which 22,500 hot meals would be provided at the RC Senior Center and 16,250 meals prepared for
home delivery. Oldtimers Foundation is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335.
Rancho Cucamonga Public Library -Back To Basics: The Back to Basic program trains volunteer
tutors to work with 7 to 12-year old children identified by school personnel as at-risk (challenged
economically and educationally) and who are reading and writing below their grade levels. The
Rancho Cucamonga Public Library is located at 7368 Archibald Avenue, and in August 2006, it will
relocate to the Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center located at 11505 Cultural Center Drive.
Rancho Cucamonga Fontana YMCA- Senior Transoortation: Provide senior citizens transportation
to and from the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, as well as local grocery shopping. The program
is provided by Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA.
Camp Fire USA: The program provides a 5-day resident camp session to learn responsibility,
develop skills, and gain confidence while building independence and self-reliance. The camp
session is run at Camp Nawakwa, located in the Barton Flats recreation area of the San Bernardino
Mountains. Camp Fire USA is located at 9037 Arrow Route, Suite 140, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
91730.
Proiect Sister: Project Sister provides sexual assault and violence prevention by working with teens
addressing date rape, sexual harassment, and personal safety awareness, and working with
seniors, who are vulnerable sexual assault, robbery, burglary, and financial exploitation. Project
Sister is located at P.O. Box 1390, Claremont, CA 91711.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department -Northtown Collaborative: The Northtown
Collaborative is a community (youth and adult) prevention recreation/human services program
provides essential human service programs as well as traditional recreational classes and activities.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 14 April 2008
Community Development Block Granl Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P218
The program is conducted through a joint use agreement with the Cucamonga Middle School and
NHDC. The Community Services Department is located at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730.
Hope Through Housing Foundation: Hope Through Housing provides opportunities in career
development, education, and jobs, by empowering participants with current technology. Hope's
parent organization is SCHDC, which operates the apartment complexes identified in Activity 1.1.1.
The program will focus on the residents of Rancho Verde Village, Monterey Village, Sycamore
Springs, Mountainside Apartments, and theirsurrounding neighborhoods. Hope Through Housing
will operate out of Rancho Verde Village apartments, 8837 Grove Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
91730.
Rising Stars of Equestrian Theraoy (RSET): Provides therapeutic, recreational, and instructional
horse riding to persons of all ages, with the primary emphasis on those with physical and mental
disabilities. The program includes therapeutic exercise, development of fine motor skills, auditory
commands, and equine husbandry. RSET is located at 8401 Bella Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
91701.
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.
Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds:
o Fair Housing: $11,680.
o Landlord/Tenant Mediation: $9,730.
o House of Ruth: $7,400.
o SOVA: $6,810.
o YMCA - YOC: $4,870.
o Senior Nutrition: $8,270.
o Back To Basics: $10,000.
o YMCA -Senior Transportation: $14,600.
o Camp Fire USA: $6,520.
o Project Sister: $9,400.
o Northtown Collaborative: $16,000.
o Hope Through Housing: $4,870.
o RSET: $2,950.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2009, assist the following:
o Fair Housing - 388 persons.
o Landlord/Tenant - 228 households.
o House of Ruth - 1,600 persons.
o SOVA - 1,258 persons.
o YMCA - YOC - 40 youth.
o Senior Nutrition - 570 seniors.
o Back To Basics - 132 persons.
o YMCA -Senior Transportation - 3,700 seniors.
o Camp Fire USA - 20 youth.
o Project Sister - 980 persons.
o Northtown Collaborative - 3,200 persons.
o Hope Through Housing - 145 persons.
o RSET - 40 persons.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 15 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P219
Program 12.1: Installation of handicap wheelchair ramps at all curb returns.
Activity 12.1.1: This program involves the retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate
disabled individuals.-
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department.
Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds: $ 30,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2009, provide approximately 2,880 square feet of
curbing for handicap ramps.
Program 13.1: The rehabilitation of significant historic structures, with primary
emphasis on residential assistance.
Activity 13.1.1: The preservation and historic restoration of the Etiwanda Railway Station.
The mission of this activity is to preserve the station through renovation for
adaptive reuse as a museum and trailhead for the Pacific Electric Inland
Trail, a 21-mile long regional trail. It is anticipated that this activity will be a
multi-year program, requiring additional CDBG funds in future program years.
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.
Geographic Location: The Etiwanda Railway Station is located at 7089 Etiwanda Avenue.
Resources: CDBG funds: $50,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2009 assist in the preparation of design studies,
planning and administrative activities, and construction activitiesfortherestoration and preservation
of this historic property.
Activity 13.1.2: The preservation and historic restoration of the Chaffey-Isle House.
Proposed activities will include selective demolition and modifications to
secure the structure from the environment and halt the physical effects of
deterioration on the structure's exterior. Historic restoration will include:
rehabilitation, framing, repairing exterior siding, painting, dry walling,
plumbing, and electrical. This activity will provide an additional funding
towards the preservation and historic restoration of this structure. This is a
multi-year program and will be completed through a cooperative effort
between the City and the Etiwanda Historical Society.
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.
Geographic Location: The Chaffey-Isle House is located at 7086 Etiwanda Avenue.
Resources: CDBG funds: $153,580.
(Funding includes $85,780 in prior year funds and $67,800 in reprogrammed funds).
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2009, complete rehabilitation and preservation
efforts at both the Chaffey-Isle House.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 16 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P220
Program 14.1: Provide for the necessary planning and administrative activities of the
CDBG program.
Activity 14.1.1: Includes administration of the CDBG program, the completion of program
applications and performance reports, research and analysis, target area
studies, historic preservation evaluations, and housing documents.
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.
Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds: $ 202,630.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2009, complete all administrative and program
management oversight to ensure efficient and effective use of CDBG funds.
Program 15.1: Support housing and Community Developmentactivities thatstimufate
economic development.
Activity 15.1.1: Review and evaluation of Foothill Boulevard. Foothill Boulevard, west of
Haven Avenue is older with mixed uses and appears to be reaching stages
of economic distress, while the area east of Haven Avenue has primarily new
development and vacant land. The concern is with revitalization of the older
areas and planning land use to ensure effective and balanced growth along
Foothill Boulevard.
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.
Geographic Location: Approximately six miles from Grove Avenue to East Avenue.
Resources: City General Fund.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: On January 16, 2002, the City Council adopted the
Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The City's Foothill Boulevard and
Economic Task Force reviewed existing Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan policies and developed
standards for softscape improvements that will occur within the street right-of-way. These
improvements will include signage, street furniture, landscaping, etc, to establish a unified street
theme. The Visual Improvement Plan will be implemented by private development as vacant
properties fronting along Foothill Boulevard develop and through public improvements where the
street frontage is currently improved.
The purpose of the Visual Improvement Plan is to develop a design specification plan that will set
forth design concepts for the streetscape improvements within the public rights-of-way and entry
areas along the entire length of Foothill Boulevard. The plan will help guide a balanced and unified
pattern of streetscape for both public and private development. By drawing upon the existing
positive improvements and developing a set of unique and unifying historic elements, this plan will
ensure that Foothill Boulevard will be an exciting reflection of the historic Route 66 as well as a
historic Rancho Cucamonga. A variety of improvements have been installed along Foothill
Boulevard, in the vicinity of the Victoria Gardens mall; however, much of the Visual Improvement
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 17 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P221
Plan has not yet been implemented. Through June 30, 2009, continue with the implementation of
the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan as it applies to development
occurring along Foothill Boulevard.
Program 16.1: Continue improvements to residential energy efficiency, lead-based
paint hazard reduction, and code enforcementthrough the City's Home
Improvement Program.
Activity 16.1.1: The City currently funds a Home Improvement Program in which, through the
course of that activity, the rehabilitation improvements mentioned previously
would be completed. A separate activity will not be developed.
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.
Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: Activity accomplishments occur through the Home
Improvement Program. (See Objective 5, Activity 5.1.1.).
Program 16.2: Continue funding the Graffiti Removal Program.
Activity 16.2.1: City crews operate in lower income target neighborhoods to remove incidents
of graffiti.
Lead Agency: Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department.
Geographic Location: Available in all eligible target neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6, &
7.
Resources: CDBG funds: $ 22,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2009, remove approximately 15,000 square feet
of graffiti.
OTHER ACTIONS
fr; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The RDA Implementation Plan includes a section on "Commercial and Industrial Economic
Enhancement Programs." The objective of that program is to strengthen the economic environment
of the commercial/Industrial sector of the Redevelopment Project Area. This is accomplished
through a variety of programs designed to address the needs of Rancho Cucamonga's existing
businesses, to attract new businesses to the City, and provide long-term employment to strengthen
and compliment the economy of the City.
Economic development goals focus on job creation, improving the quality of life to residents and
businesses, increasing the City's tax base, and providing opportunities for public and private
partnerships, including private investment in the community. Economic development activities focus
on two basic efforts: business retention and business attraction. Currently, the RDA has
successfully implemented a variety of marketing and promotion strategies suggested in the strategic
Cily of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 78 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P222
plan that have leveraged the community's attributes as well as establishing a positive business
related image. Through a comprehensive plan of advertisement campaigns, direct mail of
newsletters, site selection information, trade shows, publishing editorials, press releases, and
Internet web page, the City has managed to receive local, regional, and even national recognition.
Despite this success and recognition, the RDA continues to work to attract businesses that fit the
general business environment of the City and achieve a greater presence in the area. The City will
continue with these economic development efforts during the 2005-2006 program year.
The RDA's marketing and promotion efforts have signifcantly affected employment, expansion, and
the local tax base. From 1994-2001, more that 80 companies expanded and/or relocated creating
more than 5,300 newjobs because of the Agency's marketing and promotion efforts. Although the
City's success in economic development is not a direct result of the Agency's marketing and
promotional efforts, the Agency has managed to facilitate that growth.
Apart from the specifics of the Economic Development strategy, the Agency assists companies
through participation in the following programs. The Inland Empire Small Business Development
Center (SBDC), which offers a variety of resources to improve business operation including,
business consulting, seminars and workshops, information resources, procurement assistance,
environmental assistance, and a variety of other programs. The results of the SBDC during the past
year were outstanding. Over 179 local businesses were assisted, 244 newjobs were created, and
many otherjobs have been retained. The SBDC has also assisted in securing $ 1.5 million in new
financing for small businesses.
~: AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING
In 1984, the City began contracting with the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) to
provide for the education and enforcement of state and federal housing laws for all residents who
request assistance. The IFHMB provides public education, mediation, counseling, testing, and legal
referral services to promote fair housing. Having the IFHMB administer the Fair Housing Program
assures that there are no impediments to fair housing choices. Fair Housing education is provided
as a major component of the program with a goal of providing the knowledge of what is Fair Housing
to all partners of the housing industry. Fair Housing outreach is provided through radio
programming, mass media, brochures, and the IFHMB web site
(http://hometown.aol.com/inmedbd/index.html). Enforcement is provided through the process of
mediation through the IFHMB, or a related enforcement agency. And finally, Fair Housing testing is
used as a tool to gather evidence of discrimination. The Fair Housing program attempts to
accomplish the primary objectives of the City's Fair Housing Impediments Analysis by providing for
the education, counseling, mediation, testing, and legal referral of Fair Housing issues within the
community.
In May 1996, the City completed afive-year Fair Housing Analysis of Impediments (AI). The City
contracted with Cotton/Bridges/Associates to update the AI, which was adopted by the City Council
on December 4, 2002. While the AI identifes a number of potential issues, certain issues are
beyond the ability of a local jurisdiction to address, such as those related to lending practices. The
actions established at implementation of the AI represent those that can be addressed by the City.
Expanding Affordable Housing Opportunities
Housing affordability alone is not necessarily a fair housing issue. However, when housing
affordability issues interact with other factors covered under the fair housing laws, such as
household type, composition, and race/ethnicity, fair housing concerns may arise.
Moreover, the fair housing equation has two sides. One the one side is the availability of a
range of housing choices and on the other side is equal access to those choices. Therefore,
a community must ensure that it has a range of housing choices to meet the various needs
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 19 April 2008
Community Development Block Granl Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P223
of all income segments in the community.
Action 1: The City will continue to provide homeownership opportunities in the community
by promoting the First-Time Homebuyer Program. The City will focus outreach efforts
towards lower income households, particularly to Black, Hispanic, and Asian households,
since they have more difficulty obtaining financing. Specifically the City will provide
advertisements and workshops in both Spanish and English to inform residents about this
program. Implementation of this action is on-going.
Action 2: The City will continue to facilitate the development of housing for all income
groups within the community. The City will focus on facilitating affordable housing
development through a combination of financial and regulatory assistance. Specifically, the
City will work to provide affordable housing throughout the community, avoiding an over-
impaction of specific neighborhoods. Implementation of this action is on-going.
Action 3: The City will develop a monitoring system of the RDA's lending practices for the
First Time Homebuyer Program, as this program is not subject to HMDA.
Rehabilitation Assistance
Action 4: The City will continue to provide rehabilitation assistance for owner-occupied and
investor-owned single-family housing in the community. Existing programs include the
Home Improvement Grant, Deferred Payment Loan Program, and the Emergency Home
Improvement Grant. The City will ensure that information about these programs be provided
in the City's brochures, advertisements, and website in both English and Spanish.
Implementation of this action is on-going.
Action 5: The City will ensure that Spanish speaking staff is available to assist residents in
the City regarding code enforcement, housing rehabilitation, and other housing services.
Implementation of this action is on-going.
Action 6: The City will continue to rehabilitate substandard multi-family housing in the
community. Implementation of this action is on-going.
Access to Information
Action 7: The City will work to expand its website to provide additional links to housing
services and resources, such as a link to the fair housing service provider and a link to the
Fannie Mae Foundation which offers free guides and resources forfirst-time home buyers in
both English and Spanish. Implementation of this action is on-going.
Public Policies and Programs
Action 8: The City will provide developers with federal fair housing guide information
regarding accessibility requirements as part of the land use entitlement process. In addition,
the City may consider incorporating accessibility compliance as part of the entitlement
process.
Action 9: The City will continue to pursue affordable housing development programs
identified in the 2000-2004 Housing Element. To the extent feasible, the City will facilitate
the development of housing affordable to lower and moderate-income households according
to the Regional Housing Needs Allocation identified in the Housing Element.
Outreach to Lenders
Action 10: The City will work with local lenders and government institutions to provide
outreach to lower income residents about government-backed financing. The City will
encourage local lenders to provide information in both English and Spanish. Implementation
City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Page-20 Apri12008
Community Development Block Grant Program
20D8-2009 Annual Aclion Plan
P224
of this action is on-going
Action 11: The City will encourage lenders, particularly local lenders, to hold home buying
workshops in Rancho Cucamonga by local lending institutions. These workshops should be
held in both English and Spanish. Implementation of this action is on-going as workshops
are conducted on an annual basis.
Action 12: The City will explore regional effort to study predatory lending issues and support
state and federal initiatives to address predatory lending practices. Discuss with the fair
housing service provider a regional study of predatory lending and ongoing support ofanti-
predatory lending initiatives.
Fair Housing Services
Action 13: The fair housing service provider will continue to conduct fair housing workshops
for residents, apartment owners, and property managers. The City will encourage the fair
housing service provider to coordinate with the real estate associations regarding fair
housing training. Implementation of this action is on-going by providing annual training
opportunities.
HMDA Monitoring
Action 14: The fair housing service provider will monitor complaints regarding unfair lending,
and assess lending patterns using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Data (HMDA) and
other data sources. The City continues to monitor HMDA and other data on an annual
basis.
Action 15: The City will work with the fair housing service provider to ensure that an
increased number of fair housing tests be performed in the City. Testing will be conducted
periodically.
~'+ OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER-SERVED NEEDS
The primary obstacle identified toward meeting under-served needs is a lack of available resources.
This obstacle is and will continue to be an issue. The best way to address this matter is to combine
efforts and resources and tap new funding sources. The City is striving to form public/private
partnerships as well as seeking out new sources of funding, such as HOME funds to better leverage
available funding.
:'+ ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING
A majority of the objectives and actions identified as part of this Annual Action Plan are specifically
aimed at increasing and maintaining the City's existing affordable housing stock. Activities such as
new construction, conservation of at-risk units, and preservation of existing units are all striving to
increase the affordable housing stock.
~: ACTIONS TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
There were no significant barriers to affordable housing identified that would need to be revised or
amended. All regulations and policies currently in-place are necessary in order to maintain the
public health, safety, and welfare.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page-21 April 2008
Community Development Block Granl Program
2008-2009 Annual Aciion Plan
P225
:+ ACTIONS TO EVALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS
In conjunction with the Home Improvement Program, the City will continue to implement federal
requirements concerning lead-based paint reductions. HUD requires that fdr any program utilizing
CDBG funds, all owners, and/ortenants be notified in writing aboutthe dangers of lead-based paint.
Units constructed prior to 1978, which are occupied by children under the age of seven, are
inspected for defective paint surfaces. If a child residing in the home has an elevated blood lead
level, then defective chewable surfaces will be treated and lead abated. It is also recommended that
housing rehabilitation efforts carried out by the RDA also follow the same guidelines.
.'•: ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POVERTY LEVEL FAMILIES
The City has relatively little control over the many factors that may affect the determination of an
individual's income level. The primary activity that maybe utilized by the City is the support of public
service agencies that incorporatejob training and life development skills into their programs, which
includes most of the agencies currently receiving CDBG funding. The activities funded by the City,
particularly those related to non-housing community development, act indirectly to increase
economic development in the City. The City, through its CDBG contract activities, complies with
Section 3 requirements encouraging the employment of local low-income individuals.
From a housing perspective, all of the priorities, objectives, and programs aimed at increasing
affordable housing also increase the stock of housing available to those in the lowest income
categories.
~+ ACTIONS TO DEVELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION
The Consolidated Plan evaluated gaps in the institutional structure and actions that might betaken
to strengthen the system. It was determined that one main action that can be taken toward this is
increasing expertise of staff and City Council, which in turn will increase the CDBG program
efficiency and effectiveness. Increased contact and coordination among City departments will also
contribute to the CDBG program's effectiveness.
The City will continue to encourage direct contact between itself and the Public Housing Agency and
other service providers operating in the region. Most of the coordination efforts in the west end are
tied to funding resources and the type of service provided.
:: PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS
Each year the City reviews the Annual Comprehensive Grant application submitted by the Housing
Authority whereby the City must certify consistency of the activities with the goals and objectives of
the Consolidated Plan.
:± MONITORING
Monitoring serves as an effective tool to ensure that federal funds are spent in a manner consistent
with the CDBG National Objectives and that the programs and projects are achieving stated goals.
The following outlines basic monitoring requirements that are followed in the implementation of the
CDBG program.
Standards Utilized for Review:
o Is the program meeting intended objectives?
o Is the agency capable of tracking and/or documenting necessary benefit information and
carrying out the responsibilities of its program consistent with federal requirements?
o Is appropriate and accurate documentation submitted in a timely manner?
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 22 April 2008
Community Development Block.Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P226
Monitoring Procedures for Construction Projects -All construction projects are expected to comply
with federal labor and procurement procedures as well as the various affirmative action and equal
opportunity requirements required by various federal and state laws. To ensure this end, CDBG
staff developed a Procurement and Contract Compliance Manual that outlines the various
procedures and steps required as part of contract management. The CDBG coordinator oversees
and reviews contract preparation at each step from bid preparation, contract document preparation,
pre-construction meetings, and ongoing project inspections.
Monitoring Procedures for Subrecipient Agencies -All Subrecipient agencies must sign a contract
with the City in which the various scope of work, time line, and documentation requirements are
outlined. On a monthly basis, each Subrecipient must submit detailed information regarding the
number, ethnicity, and income level of individuals benefiting with CDBG funds. Quarterly summary
reports are required of some agencies in which further information is provided on activities
accomplished in that quarter. The City's monitoring goal is to conduct an on-site inspection of each
agency at least once a year, preferably toward the end of the funding cycle.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
The preparation of a representative and useful Annual Action Plan is the result of an effective citizen
participation process. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of
its residents in accordance with the provisions of its Citizen Participation Plan. The following steps
were taken to ensure adequate public participation.
1. A public notice of available funds and soliciting project applications was published in the
Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin on November 21, 2007. Copies of the notice were also
posted at City Hall and mailed to approximately 50 individuals and organizations.
2. Notice regarding the 30-day review period and availability of the draft 2008-2009 Annual
Action Plan and notice of the public hearing was published in the Inland Vallev Daily
Bulletin on March 17, 2008. Letters providing notice of the public hearing and indicating
the documents availability were mailed to surrounding jurisdictions, the County of San
Bernardino, and the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino. Copies of the
notice were posted at City Hall. The public hearing was held on April 16, 2008.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - 23 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Acfion Plan
P227
APPENDIX "A" -EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
~; PURPOSE OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN
The Consolidated Plan is a comprehensive 5-year strategy that addresses the use of federal
grant/entitlement funds, such as CDBG funds to meet the goal of providing decent housing, a
suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities principally for persons oflow- and
moderate-income.
P.'+ PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
The Annual Action Plan identifies specific projects consistent with the Consolidated Plan 5-year
strategy listing the projects, programs, and resources that will be utilized during the program year.
During the 2008-2009 program year, the City will receive an entitlement allocation of $7,013,150,
which is $38,341 less than fiscal year 2007-2008. These funds will be used to support the following
housing and community development activities.
=P.rdJecC7ype '-'.,
-.:,'.,~ '* k e ~a
,
r ;
-k'se m,r .. ,-~ ~ r `,.".Implementing'Agency ,y? - ~
.„,-i " 't~
, .~
~ c~.:~ '
, rre= ~~s ..- ~ w.. Prior Yearl
,. Reprogram "
I Revolving
a .: Loan .FY 2008/2009
,Allocation =
;. z ti~, _TOtal'AYailable
,
~
AAministration. c
y _ .~,~, ?-, " K r. ~ - „ n :~,- t ~ .~~*~ ~~ 't- a .;;w a -.~
CDBG Administration
"~Ca ital%Irn rovemeritaPro ibdt Rancho Cucamon a Plannin De L $0.00 $202,630.00
$0.00 $202,630.00
s ~-47:-~ F: >' 'x• r,--• -1„k_ -
` $202,630.00
$202,6311.00
- ~':~-
Sidewalk Grindin Rancho Cucamon a En
ineerin De t. $0.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00
Wheelchair Rams Rancho Cucamon a En ineerin De 1. $0.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00
Etiwanda Railwa Station Rancho Cucamon a Plannin De t. $0.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
Chaffe -Isle House Rancho Cucamon a Plannin De t. $153,580.00 $0.00 $153,580.00
Calle Ve'ar
:HomeJm roJement"Pro ram Rancho Cucamon a En ineerin De t. $16.000.00 $196,550.00 $212.550.00
5169,580.00 $298,550.00 $468,130.00
+ .. "-.. ,:N ~x'Fv „+, ~'. 'n~;t.`'`. "-s*'~'~z, ~ ,r--' K, "~'~~ ,y>e~.
Home Im rovement Rancho Cucamon a Plannin De L $108,060.00 $350,000.00 $458,060.00
Home Maintenance
`.PUbIid:Senvides'ry^' S Oldtimers Foundation $0.00 $10.000.00 $10,000.00
$108,060.00 $360,000.00 $468,060.00
"*~x°"`... -...'~x5x ~:: .. _„+. „,... ;... ~. ._,- : -a..
Graffiti Removal Rancho Cucamon a En ineerin De t $0.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00
Fair Housin Inland Mediation Board $0.00 $11,680.00 $11,680.00
Landlord/Tenant Inland Mediation Board $0.00 $9,730.00 $9,730.00
Emer enc Sheller Foothill Famil Shelter $0.00 $4,870.00 $4,870.00
Emer enc Sheller House of Ruth $0.00 $7,400.00 $7,400.00
Food Distribution SOVA $0.00 $6,810.00 56,810.00
Youth Aclivit YMCA -Your Own Club $0.00 $4,870.00 $4,870.00
Senior Trans ortation West End YMCA $0.00 $14,600.00 $14,600.00
Senior Pro rams Rancho Cucamon a Communit Services 50.00 576,000.00 $16,000.00
Human ServiceslRecreation Northtown Collaborative $0.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00
Literac Rancho Cucamon a Public Libra $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Food Distribution Oldlimers Foundation $0.00 $8,270.00 $8,270.00
Youth Activit Cam Fire USA $0.00 $6.520.00 $6,520.00
Sexual Assault Assistance Pro'ect Sister $0.00 $9,400.00 $9,400.00
Career/Education/Jobs Ho a Throu h Housin Foundation 50.00 $4,870.00 $4,870.00
Human Services/Recreation Risin Stars of E uestrian Thera
• ,~ $0.00
$0.00
$277,640.00 $2,950.00
$151,970.00
$1,013,150.00 $2,950.00
$151,970.00
$1,290,790.00
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page A- 1 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
P228
APPENDIX r'Brr -SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5-YEAR AND 1-YEAR GOALS
In identifying the outcome/objective, the City or Rancho Cucamonga follows the numbering system
developed by the HUD CPD Performance Measurement System. The outcome/objective numbers
are as follows:
•
';Decent Housin - ~~} , ~ "~''k;, DH-1 ~
DH-2 DH-3
~Suitatile Livin iEri3lionment- - !' SL-1 SL-2 SL-3
;Economic O ~ orturii -. ~-'~ ' '- _' ~ s,- ° EO-1 EO-2 EO-3
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
., ., .,
.. -
1.1 Acquisition of existing multiple-family units to be heltl for RDA, 2005 200 177 58
future affordable housing stock. CHFA 2008 40 0 0
zoo? 0
zoofi o %
zoos
6r:MULT1-YEARiGOALL~
~ 240AR%i"r
iEN`~.tA7 _.. %
$~E?J,`6ed%i3`,oii
1.2 Acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single-family RDA, 2005 1 0 0%
homes. CHFA 2008 0 0 0%
2007 D
2D08 0
2009
~MULI'1-YEAR'GOAL€=:
1!
0~3
rs»i'.~.'4'~.:
2.1 Construction of affordable (multi-family) units. RDA, 2005 6 0 0%
HOME 2D06 0 0 0%
2007 356
zoofi o %
2009
~MUL7I=YEAR'GOAL ~172'~~ O ~I+!u~,rPj';2':•-a
2.2 Construction of single-family infill development in low- RDA, 2005 5 0 0%
antl moderate-income neighborhootls. CHFA 2008 0 0 0%
2007 0
2006 0
2009
.. ~MULTI=::YEAR!GOAL ~ :5' ".. D~ ~F~94:rrt
3.1' Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Federal 2005 770 170 100
Bernardino County for future Section a and public Housing 2006 1717 170 100
housing assistance. Funds 2007 170
'These fgures are not cumulative, but represent the 2006 170
number of units operated by the Housing Authority during
the program year. 2000
rtMULTJ-YEARfGOAG"$~
.y1T0~'df,
rcC .. 770',a~, %
&~,4t~„?Tr'.
4.1 Administer a City sponsoretl Home Buyer Program. RDA 2005 10 1 10%
20% Set 2006 70 8 80%
Aside 2007 10
2008 10
2009
.MULTI-YEAR GOALa` . £ '140 - 91 !°.2_°.,w'i&-c!'
4.3 Assist the NHDC First-Time Home Buyer Program. RDA 2005 8 0 0%
2006 6 0 0%
2007 0
2008 0
zoos ^i
r
~ MULTI-YEAR+GOAL i42~C ~10: _.-: :k'r:•r
5.1 Provide motlerate rehabilitation of owner occupietl, CDBG 2005 40 46 tt5%
single-family and mobile homes for extremely low-, low-, 2006 40 46 120
and motlerate-income homeowners. 2007 40
2D06 40
2009
'.MULTI-YEARGOALS~^ ~ 720 -l~': -' o-..94:-~ 'et ,s ==:':
6.7' Support applications o/ the Housing Authority for their Federal 2005 7fi 76 100
Annual Comprehensive Grant to improve living conditions Housing 2006 76 76 100%
for public housing residents. Funds 2007 i6
'These fgures are not cumulative, but represent the 2006 i6
number of units operated by the Housing Authority during 2009
the program year. 3MUL"1'1-YEAR.GOALvt".. ?r"6s`'i6~ca!^> f~'r!-$76„: L-. ,'W~.".°:,.
Cify of Rancho Cucamonga Page B - 1 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008 Housing Element
P229
HOMELESS
.,
7.1 •, .,
Continue to su on local homeless fatalities and services
Foothill Family Shelter (hh) CDBG 2005 10 63 630%
(Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal = 50) 2006 10 48 460%
2007 10
2008 10
2009
MUL••TI=.YEAR:GOAL?X:~9p,.;'40~~
[r.108;`3-'~ °/a
!'!§`,S~~3b •;-
House of Ruth (p) CDBG 2005 1,600 1,611 100.7%
(Consolidatetl Plan 5-Year Goal = 8,000) 2006 1,600 358 22.4
2007 1,600
2008 1,800
2009
`-MULThYEARIGOAC~F t.~€`:6"400. A -£.1;969.4? +'?4~'
West End Hunger Program (SOYA) (p) CDBG 2005 1,260 676 52.8%
(Consolidatetl Plan 5-Year Goal = 6,400) 2006 1,280 488 38.1
2007 1,280
2ooe 1.zeD =r,
zoos %
;MULTI-YEAR•`GOAL:5`:120 ' m1a 1,18441G1 1°.r'^~.'~
~.Cf~='TOTAL-~ _ u1~.1,P560"e~8 E~`32425'~+~^ r s`-
SPECIAL NEEDS
., .. ..
8.1 Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to CDBG 2005 60 48 76.6
eligible households with emphasis on assistance to low- 2006 60 49 81.6°/,
and mode2te-income seniors. 2007 60
2009 BO
zoos
R~MUCTI=YEAR GOAL'5~ 740,+r~'+~..
-n95s;~,% %
~::~.•Trie
9.1 Suppon special need services in areas where there are CDBG 2005 550 550 100%
significant untler-served needs. 2006 550 550 100%
2007 550
2009 550
2009
MULTI=YEARiGOAL'~"d Z 200t<$:if ~'1 100>w--- 4+"x'~i~4;afi:E-
NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
.,
10.1 ., ..
Complete all necessa infrastmcture antl sidewalk im rove
ments in cual
i(etl tar et areas.
Old Town Park ~ ~ CDBG 2005 N/A N/A 0%
2006 N/A NIA 0%
2007 1
20D8 N/A %
2009
3"MULTI-YEAR+GOAC'7?•9 Rt^t,~>~SZ7:` 4#?# d.0:~s r.' +!i-~..:
Sidewalk Grinding and Replacement CDBG 2005 3,960 17,135 432.7%
2006 3,960 3,250 62.1 %
2007 3,960
2006 3,980
2009 %
'MULTI=YEAR:GOAL ~Rd5840".~-' e'4k.20'365°idti sy%4a`~5'
HeIImaNArrow Drainage Improvements CDBG 2005 1 0 0%
2006 1 0 0%
2007 1
2006 N/A
zoos %
'GMULTI-YEAR GOAL*w".. ~" .1 ° ; a~°?":.~ g ix/'1?.,, „
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page B - 2 April 2008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008 Housing Element
P230
NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS (COrlt.)
.~
11.1 .~ .~
Assist public service agencies that support groups in the highest priority categories inclutling: fair housing counseling, lantllortl-tenant
mediation, homeless and footl assistance, emergency shelters, tlomestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, antl literacy
ro rams.
Fair Housing ~CDBG 2005 388 63 16.2%
(Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal = 1,940) 2006 388 100 25.7
2007 388
' 2008 368
2009 %
-'.MUBTIaYEAR'GOAL 1 "552 -163'
r
~ _
Landlord/Tenant Mediation CDBG 2005 228 765 ~ 335.5%
(Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal = 1,140) 2006 228 843 369.7
2007 228 °/.
2008 228
2009
~MUET1~=„YEAR!OOAL-'Hffi ,982AIR°J '1;OBBk'k . 11
Youth-At-Risk (YMCA Vour Club, Narthlown CDBG 2005 3,240 5,037. 1555%
Collaborative) 2006 3,240 4,900 151.2%
(Consolidatetl Plan 5-Year Goal = 800) 2007 3,240
2008 3,240
zoos %
'MUCTI.=YEARIGOAL ^x,12'960 l~b9;937
TOTAL~~1S'424 t11~13"168
House o/ Ruth CDBG 2005 1,800 1,611 100.7%
(Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal = 8,000) 2006 1,6110 358 22.4%
2007 1,600
zooe 1soD %
zoos %
",MUL6TI!-YEARrGOAL - ~ 6`d00 1~'S1;969~ .
Family Literacy (Back 2 Basics) CDBG 2005 132 77 53.8
(Consolidated Plan 5-Year Goal = 500) 2006 732 75 56.8
2007 - 132
2008 132
2009
°'MUL=TIr=YEARF GOAL' 528 146&Ii
~~
Oldtimers Senior Nutrition CDBG 2005 570 5,504 965.6%
(Consolitlated Plan 5-Year Goal = 2,850) 2006 570 5,792 1,016.1
2007 570
2008 570 %
2009 °/.
-'MULTL--YEAR1 GOAl:. ~~;2280 ~+11296r~ ~F:=^.
SOVA CDBG 2005 1,280 676 52.8%
(Consolitlated Plan 5-Year Goal = 6,400) 2006 1,280 488 38,8
2007 1,280
zooe 1,zeD %
zoos %
=-.MULTf=YEAR, GOAL~r ~: -5 ]20if 1164 : ~;:_ ~}^};e,,.
y,,'??x 'n"kF-.TOTALw'~z;.14.328:-~•. a 14 575 ', =~s ;Yet`v~.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page B- 3
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008 Housing Element
P231
NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS (COflt.)
.. .. •,
12.1. Installation of handicap wheelchair ramps at all curb CDBG 2005 2,660 276 72.1
returns. 2006 2,860 456 75.6%
2007 2,660
' 2008 2,880 %
2009
-
~: ,;xMULtI=.YEARlGOAL~M6;1d;520jy1t1 (~iZ32
73.7 The rehabilitation of significant historic structures, with CDBG 2005 3 3 100
primary emphasis on resitlential assistance. 2006 3 3 100
(Numbers are not cumulative but represent the number of 2007 3
properties assisted each program year.) 2pOg 2
2009 %
•
a, iIMULTI ~=YEARIGOAL 8 -3
75.7 Support housing and Community Development activities RDA, 2005 1 7 700%
that stimulate economic development. General 2006 1 1 100%
Funtl 2007 1
2006 1
2009
~
~ :7MULTI~~YEARiGOALr~ f1 - 1~ .- - _:
16.2 Continue funding a Graffiti removal program, CDBG 2005 14,999 13,903 92.7%
(Expected antl Actual are represented in square feet of 2006 14,899 60,040 533.6
graffiti removetl.) 2007 14,999
2008 14,999
2009
nMUITI =YEARrGOAL~!S° ~±'69;996i ~".93'943?? ~i^^.G ~'`3
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page B -4 April 2008
Community Development 81ock Grant Program
2008 Housing Element
P232
APPENDIX "C" -ATTACHMENTS
SUPPORTING MAPS: PROPOSED PROJECTS AND LOW-MOD INCOME
SUPPORTING FORMS: FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL
NEEDS/NON-HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS
LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS
CERTIFICATIONS
City of Rancho Cucamonga Page C - 1 Apri12008
Community Development Block Grant Program
2008-2009 Annual Action Plan
_~
0
Q
Q
O
N
0
c
m
D
U
c~
U
MO
W
^~
W
Q
_o ~
N =
> >,
~~
^ ~
~o
.~ -~_
~ ->
~ O
o~
U c~
•
~~
~ c~ -~ ~
c~~ ~~
..~ . o ~
=+='O-~~CL~
~ ~ U ~ O
~ ~o o~~
~ ~~°~
Q~~~~-~
~~~•~ ~ C6
~L~~~O
~~~0~'s=
~ 0
o
>~ U N~~
Q>,C~~~~
~1~
o-V~ ~_~ O
~ ~ >' N `~"
~~>~~~
~cp~°~
Q ~ moo ~' o
~~ ~
(~0~~~~
~ V~ ~ C6 ~
i~~~N~
o>--o-~~
~o~~~~
~~
~-
o~
~~
~ L.L
~~
a~ ~
O
L
0
~--+
O
.~
c~
U
U
0
•
O
L
(~
C'6
c~
O
c~
.Q
~.
Q
.O
N
0
U
.~
~-
W
.A1
U
L
0
U
Q
C
Q
00
0
0
N
L
._
~--+
.~
U
a~
.,
O
C6
m
r
O
00
O
L1_.
r
M
r
O
..
r
d-
M
~-
O
C~
U
~_
Q
L
c~
a~
L
U
N
0
C~
M
N
C~
.X
C~
Q
_~
0
U
Q
Q
0
N
~--+
.j
U
C6
.~
L
0
a~
.~
._
a~
..
L
~ ~
O .
~ ~
L
_~
.~
O
a~
a~
0
a~
.~
•
.~
+-+
U
U
v~
a~
._
O
U
0
. ;
a~
.~
a~
.~
~_
~--i
.~
~~+
L
0
Q.
0
.V
O
0
a~
4-
0
.o
c~
X
a~
~--
•
W
L
O
O
0
L
a~
~.
0
c~
~_
~U
.~
Q.
O
U
C
c~
0
U
Q
Q
0
0
0
0
O
~ ~
~ ~
C6 .,..~
~ ~
C~
._
~ ~
~ --
-~
~ U
~ ~
~ O
.. +~
~ ~
a~ ~
~ U
~ ~
~ --
o ~
._
~ ~
~~
~ ~
C~ `~
m
C~
D ~
U o
•
(~
O
N
0
U
.~
Ca
O
0
0
O
00 ~
~ ~
to ~''
~ ~
._ ~
._ ~
•~ O
U
t~
m C6
O ~
U ~
~ o
~ ~
o ~
~ a~
U -
._
~ -
U ~
o ~
~~
U ~
~ ~
CCS ~
~ O
O
i
~.
N
O
U
C
_~
U
.~
._
.~
._
~--+
U
C~
a~
0
O
•
c
c~
0
Q
Q
DO
O
N
0
_~
U
U
C~3
O
N
O
2
•
C~
O
d.
N
O
O
Z
~--+
U
W
U
C6
N
.~
N
O
2
O
CCS
O
IL
L
.~
-E--+
0
•
0
0
U
Q
Ca
C
Q
00
°o
N
0
W
U
N
.~
U
C~
~--~
4)
.~.-~
.~
C~
U
•
ca
.~
U
~_
.~
L
V
C6
O
L
Q.
N
~~
/1
L
.~
C~
U
•
W
U
0
U
Q
Ca
C
Q
0
0
N
0
.~
c~
c~
.o
c~
a~
L
.U
O
•
0
c~
.~
L.L
w
•
a~
0
_~
C~
U
•
~~
L...
^L
I..L
~--+
0
U
Q
Q
0
N
L
0
U
a~ .?
-~ c~
o ~o
~ ~
~ - `~ c~
o ~ -
v O ~ O .C~
•- ~ ~ U cn
~ o o ~ c~
a~ ~~ ~m
~ o 0
•-
~ ~'= o ~
_ ._
.- ~
~ ~ ~ ~ U
~ rLn- ~ O Ca
r1 ~ z m
Ca
0
U
Q
c~
c
Q
0
N
U
.~
O
U
.~
U
•
C
~_
~--i
(~
C
H
0
C
J
.~
0
.~
Cn
~ ~
'~ ~
c~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
O ~
l.L. 2
Q
U
L
U
0
U
O
U
c~
C
~-=~
0
Q
C6
L
L...
.~
U
C
O
0
I
Q
U
• • • • •
C
L
a--i
Z
.~
0
+-~
c
0
0
Q
(/~
i..~
Q.
U
to
~O
C
a--i
O
.~
O
0
Q
O
2
L
CO
W
0
• • • • •
Staff Report
DATE: April 16, 2008
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager
BY: Michael TenEyck, Utility Operations Manager
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46
OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council adopts a Resolution amending the existing electric rates, fees, and
charges pursuant to the requirements and authority of Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga established a municipal utility on
August 31, 2001. The City subsequently undertook the actions necessary to obtain
electric power from energy suppliers and construct the necessary facilities to distribute
the acquired electric power to retail customers within the City. The City Council
determined that the adoption of Electric Service Rules and Regulations was necessary
to further the orderly distribution of the electric power to the City's retail customers.
The City Council subsequently adopted Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing Electricity Service Rules and Regulations and
authorizing that the rates, fees and charges, may be amended from time to time by
resolution.
Effective March 1, 2008, Southern California Edison Company's (SCE's) rates were
increased 1.7 percent to implement the authorized Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission transmission rates for incentive ratemaking treatment. SCE was allowed to
recovery in base rates 100% of "Construction Work-in-Progress" as well as a
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT P234
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO
THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TILE 3 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
April 16, 2008
Page 2
"Return-on-Equity" Adder. The change in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Electric
Service Rates is to maintain parity with SCE Electric Service Rates.
The City has provided the required notification to the public by publishing notice of this
hearing on April 1, 2008, and April 8, 2008, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a local
newspaper of general circulation, and posting notice in at least two separate locations
within the City. The proposed revised rates have been available for public review in the
City Clerk's Office since the advertisements and resolution were first published on
April 1, 2008.
The City Council has assured itself that the amended rates fees and charges reflect the
City's reasonable and prudent costs for such an enterprise and do not establish unfair,
unreasonable, or excessive rates that exceed the City's reasonable costs of doing
business.
miffed,
i Aluzrv
:y City Manager/Community Development
Attachment
P235
RESOLUTION NO. ~8-o8Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES
AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND
AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE.
A. Recitals.
(i) The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted
Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing
Electricity Service Rules and Regulations and authorizing that the rates, fees and
charges arising, directly or indirectly, under said legislation be adopted pursuant to
resolution, and thereafter, be amended from time to time by resolution.
(ii) City staff has prepared a comprehensive schedule of the rates, fees and
charges that reflect the reasonable and prudent costs relating to the acquisition and
distribution of electric power to retail customers and are recommending that the City
Council adopt the recommended fees. These rates do not present the City an
opportunity to achieve profits or to impose charges in excess of the costs reasonably
related to the development, maintenance and expansion of a municipal electric
distribution system. The City Council has directed City staff to regularly review the
operations of the City's electric utility to ensure that the rates are sufficient to cover all
prudent business costs, reserves and capital equipment acquisition but not exceeding
the amount necessary for the same. The rates, fees and charges reflect the reasonable
costs to the City system only and do not reflect any excess rates, fees, or charges that
are in excess of the reasonable costs of providing the electrical services as set forth
hereinafter.
(iii) The City Council has reviewed the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and has
determined that the adoption of the Electric Rules and Regulations has no foreseeable
potential to a result in a significant impact upon the environment and is exempt from
CEQA review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). Further, the
City Council has determined that the adoption of the fees is exempt from substantive
environmental review under Section 15273 of the State CEQA Guidelines as no capital
projects for system expansion are included in the proposed action.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find and resolve as follows:
Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true
and correct.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
April 16, 2008
Page 2
Section 2. The rates, fees and charges assessed under Chapter 3.46 of Title 3
shall be as set forth on Attachment 1 hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set
forth herein.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2008.
Mayor
I, Debra Adams, City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2008, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga
P236
z
P237
Table of Contents
Electric Rates and Tariffs
SMALL COMMERCIAL
MEDIUM COMMERCIAL
MEDIUM COMMERCIAL (TIME-OF-USE)
LARGE COMMERCIAL
STREET LIGHTING
TRAFFIC CONTROL
OUTDOOR AREA LIGHTING
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT CHARGE
1
3
6
10
14
17
18
20
21
P238
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
SMALL COMMERCIAL
A. Applicability.
Applicable to single and three-phase general service including lighting and power
Customers, except for the Customer whose monthly Maximum Demand, in the opinion
of the Utility, is expected to exceed 20 kW or has exceeded 20 kW in any three (3)
months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for service under this
Schedule. Effective with the date of ineligibility of any Customer served under this
Schedule, the Customer's account shall be transferred to another applicable Rate
Schedule.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
Euer Char e $/kWh/Meter/Month
Summer $ 0.15620
Winter 0.15280
Customer Charge- $/Meter/Da 0.512
Three Phase Service - $/Da 0.125
1. The energy charge reflects that 28.132% of the investor-owned utility energy
requirements are supplied by the California Department of Water Resources. This
percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Conditions.
1. Summer and Winter Seasons are defined as follows:
The Summer Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on June 151 and continue until
12:00 a.m. on October 1" of each year. The Winter Season shall commence at
12:00 a.m. on October I ~` of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June 1~` of
the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing
purposes.
2. Voltage. Service will be supplied at one (1) standard voltage.
3. Three-Phase Service. Where the Utility provides three-phase service, the billing
will be increased by the amount shown in the Rates section above.
4. Temporary Discontinuance of Service.
Effective Date: March 1, 2008
P239
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made
for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer, prior to resuming
service within twelve (12) months after such service was discontinued, will be
required to pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been
discontinued.
5. Customer-Owned Electrical Generating Facilities.
Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be
permitted to allow the Customer to test the auxiliary/emergency generating
facilities.
6. Installation of Demand Meters.
Where a Customer's usage exceeds an average of 4,500 kWh per month in the
preceding 12-month period, the Utility may, at its sole option, install a demand
Meter on the account at the Utility's expense.
7. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The
charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual
billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [kW], etc.).
8. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
9. Change of Law Adjustment Factor(CLAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule ] 2, Section F.
]0. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge
State law requires all California electric uti]ities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.8~% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
. efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
Z Effective Dace: March 1, 2008
P240
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
MEDIUM COMMERCIAL
A. Applicability.
Applicable to single and three-phase service including lighting and power Customers
whose monthly Maximum Demand registers, or in the opinion of the Utility is expected
to register, above 20 kW and below 200 kW. The Customer whose monthly Maximum
Demand, in the opinion of the Utility, is expected to reach 200 kW or has reached 200
kW for any three (3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for
service under this Schedule. Effective with the date of ineligibility, such Customer's
account shall be transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule. Further, any Customer
served under this Schedule whose monthly Maximum Demand has registered 20 kW or
less for twelve (12) consecutive months is eligible for service under another applicable
Rate Schedule.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
Ener Char e - $/kWh/Meter/Month
Non TOU Pricin O lion
Summer Season $ 0.08529
Winter Season 0.07772
TOU Pricin O lion
Summer Season - On-Peak 0.10718
Mid-Peak 0.08825
Off-Peak 0.06345
Winter Season -Mid-Peak 0.09159
Off-Peak 0.06703
Customer Char e - $/Ivleter/Month 85.75
Demand Char e - $/kW of Billin Demand/Meter/Month
Facilities Related 8.76
Time Related Summer 18.79
TOU O lion Meter Char e - $/Meter/Month
Standard 16.70
RTEM 143.90
The energy charge reflects that 28.li2% of the investor-owned utility energy
requirements are supplied by the California Department of Water Resources. This
percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases.
3 Effective Date: March I, 2008
P241
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
D. Special Conditions.
Time periods are defined as follows:
On-Peak: Noon to 6:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays.
Mid-Peak: 8:00 a.m. to noon and 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. summer weekdays
except holidays.
8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. winter weekdays except holidays.
Off-Peak: All other hours.
Holidays are New Year's Day (January 1), Washington's Birthday (third Monday
in February), Memorial Day (last Monday in May), Independence Day (July 4),
Labor Day (first Monday in September), Veteran's Day (November 11),
Thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday in November), and Christmas (December
25).
When any holiday listed above falls on Sunday, the following Monday will be
recognized as an off-peak period. No change will be made for holidays falling on
Saturday.
The Summer Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on June lit and continue until
12:00 a.m. on October lit of each year. The Winter Season shall commence at
12:00 a.m. on October 1~` of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June 1~` of
the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing
purposes.
2. TOU Pricing Option.
Customers may elect the TOU Pricing Option under this Schedule, but only afrer
installation of an interval meter provided at the customer's expense. Customers
may elect a standard interval data recorder (IDR) meter or Real Time Energy
Metering (RTEM) meter and shall pay the monthly charges, as indicated in the
Rates Section of this Schedule. Service under TOU pricing will become effective
on the next regularly scheduled meter read date following installation of the IDR
meter or RTEM meter.
3. Voltage.
Service will be supplied at one (])standard voltage.
4. Billing Demand.
The Billing Demand shat] be the kilowatts of Maximum Demand, determined to
the nearest kW. The Demand Charee shall include the following billing
components. The Time Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of
Maximum Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing
period. The Facilities Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum
Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing period.
4 Effective Date: March 1, 2008
P242
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
However, when the Utility determines the Customer's Meter will record little or
no energy use for extended periods of time or when the Customer's Meter has not
recorded a Maximum Demand in the preceding eleven (11) months, the Facilities
Related Component of the Demand Charge may be established at fifty percent
(50%) of the Customer's Connected Load.
5. Maximum Demand.
The Maximum Demand in any month shall be the measured maximum average
kilowatt input, indicated or recorded by instruments, during any ]5-minute
metered interval in the month, but, where applicable, shall not be less than the
diversified resistance welder load computed in accordance with the section
designated Welder Service in Rule 2. Where the demand is intermittent or subject
to violent fluctuations, a 5-minute interval may be used.
6. Temporary Discontinuance of Service.
Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made
for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer resuming service
within twelve (12) months after such service was discontinued will be required to
pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been
discontinued.
7. Customer-Owned Electrical Generating Facilities.
Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be
permitted to allow the Customer to test the auxiliary/emergency generating
facilities.
8. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The
charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual
billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [kW], etc.).
9. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
] 0. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF)
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F.
11. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires al] California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.8~% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects; and services for low-income electricity customers.
5 Effective Date: March 1, 2008
P243
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
MEDIUM COMMERCIAL (TIME-OF-USE)
A. Applicability.
Applicable to single and three-phase service including lighting and power Customers
whose monthly Maximum Demand registers, or in the opinion of the Utility is expected
to register 200 kW through 500 kW. The customer whose monthly Maximum Demand,
in the opinion of the Utility, is expected to exceed X00 kW or has exceeded 500 kW for
any three (3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for service
under this Schedule and effective with the date of ineligibility, such Customer's account
shall be transferred to Large Commercial. Further, any Customer served under this
Schedule whose monthly Maximum Demand has registered below 200 kW for twelve
(12) consecutive months is ineligible for service under this Rate Schedule, and shall be
transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
Ener ~ Charge - $/kWh/Meter/Month
Summer Season - On-Peak 0.1 1752
Mid-Peak 0.09646
Off-Peak 0.06887
WinterSeason-Mid-Peak 0.09858
Off-Peak 0.07174
Customer Char e - $/Meter/Month 322.52
Demand Char e - $/kW of Billin Demand/Meter/Month
Facilities Related 9.07
Time Related
Summer Season - On-Peak 16.51
Mid-Peak 5.66
Power Factor Ad'ustment - $/KVA 0.] 8
1. The energy charge reflects that 28.132% of the investor-owned utility energy
requirements are supplied by the California Department of Water Resources. This
percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases.
6 Efrective Date'. March 1, 2008
P244
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
D. Special Conditions.
Time periods are defined as follows
On-Peak: Noon to 6:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays.
Mid-Peak: 8:00 a.m. to noon and 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. summer weekdays
except holidays.
8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. winter weekdays except holidays.
Off-Peak: All other hours.
Holidays are New Year's Day (January 1), Washington's Birthday (third Monday
in February), Memorial Day (last Monday in May), Independence Day (July 4),
Labor Day (first Monday in September), Veteran's Day (November 1 1),
Thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday in November), and Christmas (December
2~).
When any holiday listed above falls on Sunday, the following Monday will be
recognized as an off-peak period. No change will be made for holidays falling on
Saturday.
The Summer Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on June 1~` and continue until
12:00 a.m. on October In of each year. The Winter Season shall commence at
12:00 a.m. on October 1S` of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June 1~` of
the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing
purposes.
2. Voltage.
Service will be supplied at one (1) standard voltage.
3. Billing Demand.
The Billing Demand shall be the kilowatts of Maximum Demand, determined to
the nearest kW. The Demand Charge shall include the following billing
components. The Time Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of
Maximum Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing
period. The Facilities Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum
Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing period.
However, when the Utility determines the Customer's Meter will record little or
no energy use for extended periods of time or when the Customer's Meter has not
recorded a Maximum Demand in the preceding eleven (11) months, the Facilities
Related Component of the Demand Charge may be established at fifty percent
(50%) of the Customer's Connected Load.
4. Maximum Demand.
Maximum Demand shall be established for the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and Off-Peak
periods. The Maximum Demand in any month shall be the measured maximum
Effective Dale: March 1, 2008
P245
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
average kilowatt input, indicated or recorded by instruments, during any 15-
minute metered interval in the month, but, where applicable, shall not be less than
the diversified resistance welder load computed in accordance with the section
designated Welder Service in Rule 2. Where the demand is intermittent or subject
to violent fluctuations, a 5-minute interval may be used.
5. Power Factor Adjustment.
The Customer's bill will be increased each month for power factor by the amount
shown in the Rates section above for service metered and delivered at the
applicable voltage level, based on the per kilovar of maximum reactive demand
imposed by the Utility.
The maximum reactive demand shall be the highest measured maximum average
kilovar demand indicated or recorded by metering during any 15 minute interval
in the month. The kilovars shall be determined to the nearest unit. A device will
be installed on each kilovar meter to prevent reverse operation of the meter.
6. Temporary Discontinuance of Service.
Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made
for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer resuming service
within twelve (12) months after such service was discontinued will be required to
pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been
discontinued.
7. Customer-Owned Electrical Generating Facilities.
Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be
permitted to allow the Customer to test the auxiliary/emergency generating
facilities.
8. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The
charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual
billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [kW], kilovar [kVa], etc.).
9. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
] 0. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F.
1 1. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
g Effective Date: March 1, 2008
P246
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
[~ Efrective Datc March 1, 2008
P247
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
LARGE COMMERCIAL
A. Applicability.
Applicable to general services including lighting and power Customers. This Schedule is
applicable to and mandatory for all Customers whose monthly Maximum Demand, in the
opinion of the Utility, is expected to exceed 500 kW or has exceeded 500 kW in any three
(3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months. Any existing Customer on this
Schedule whose monthly Maximum Demand has registered 500 kW or less for twelve
(12) consecutive months is ineligible for service under this Schedule and shall be
transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule. Service under this Schedule is subject to
Meter availability.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
Ener Char e - $/kWh/Meter/Month ~
I
Summer Season - On-Peak $ 0.1 1053
,
Mid-Peak 0.09079
Off-Peak 0.06491
Winter Season - Mid-Peak 0.09278
Off-Peak 0.06761
Customer Char e - $/Meter/Month 414.98
Demand Charge - $/kW of Billing
Demand/Meter/Month
Facilities Related 9.90
Time Related
Summer Season - On-Peak 15.37
Mid-Peak 5.19
Power Factor Ad~ustment - $/KVA 0.18
The energy charge reflects that 28.132% of the investor-owned utility energy
requirements are supplied by the California Department of Water Resources. This
percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases.
1 Q Effective Date: March 1, 2008
P248
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
D. Special Conditions.
Time periods are defined as follows:
On-Peak: Noon to 6:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays.
Mid-Peak: 8:00 a.m. to noon and 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. summer weekdays
except holidays.
8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. winter weekdays except holidays.
Off-Peak: All other hours.
Holidays are New Year's Day (January 1), Washington's Birthday (third Monday
in February), Memorial Day (last Monday in May), Independence Day (July 4),
Labor Day (first Monday in September), Veteran's Day (November I1),
Thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday in November), and Christmas (December
25).
When any holiday listed above falls on Sunday, the following Monday will be
recognized as an off-peak period. No change will be made for holidays falling on
Saturday.
The Summer Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on June 1~` and continue until
12:00 a.m. on October 151 of each year. The Winter Season shall commence at
12:00 a.m. on October Is` of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June 1~` of
the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing
purposes.
2. Voltage.
Service will be supplied at one standard voltage
3. Maximum Demand.
Maximum Demands shall be established for the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and Off-
Peak periods. The Maximum Demand for each period shall be the measured
maximum average kilowatt input indicated or recorded by instruments, during any
15-minute metered interval, but, where applicable, not less than the diversified
resistance welder load computed in accordance with the section designated
Welder Service in Rule 2. Where the demand is intermittent or subject to violent
fluctuations, a 5-minute interval may be used.
4. Billing Demand.
The Billing Demand shall be the kilowatts of Maximum Demand, determined to
the nearest kW. The Demand Charge shall include the following billing
components. The Time Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of
Maximum Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing period
for each of the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and Off-Peak Time Periods. The Facilities
Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum Demand recorded
1 1 Effective Dale: March 1, 2008
P249
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MCINICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
during (or established for) the monthly billing period. However, when the Utility
determines the Customer's Meter will record little or no energy use for extended
periods of time or when the Customer's Meter has not recorded a Maximum
Demand in the preceding eleven (11) months, the Facilities Related Component of
the Demand Charge may be established at fifry percent (50%) of the Customer's
Connected Load. Separate Demand Charge(s) for the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and
Off-Peak Time Periods shall be established for each monthly billing period. The
Demand Charge for each time period shall be based on the Maximum Demand for
that time period occurring during the respective monthly billing period.
~. Power Factor Adjustment.
The Customer's bill will be increased each month for power factor by the amount
shown in the Rates section above for service metered and delivered at the
applicable voltage level, based on the per kilovar of maximum reactive demand
imposed by the Utility.
The maximum reactive demand shall be the highest measured maximum average
kilovar demand indicated or recorded by metering during any 15 minute metered
interval in the month. The kilovars shall be determined to the nearest unit. A
device will be installed on each kilovar Meter to prevent reverse operation of the
Meter.
6. Temporary Discontinuance of Service.
Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made
for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer, prior to resuming
service within twelve (12) months afrer such service was discontinued, will be
required to pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been
discontinued.
7. Customer-Owned Electrical Generating Facilities.
Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be
permitted to allow the Customer to test the auxiliary/emergency generating
facilities.
8. Contracts.
An initial three-year facilities contract may be required where Applicant requires
new or added serving capacity exceeding 2,000 kVA.
9. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The
charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual
billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [kW], kilovar [kVa], etc.).
I2 Effective Dete: March 1, 2008
P250
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
10. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
11. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F.
12. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
13 Etrective Date: March 1, 2008
P251
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL OTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
STREET LIGHTING
A. Applicability.
Applicable to meter for the lighting of streets, and publicly-owned and publicly-operated
automobile parking lots which are opened to the general public where the City owns and
maintains the street lighting equipment and associated facilities included under this Schedule.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory-served.
C. Rates
High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamps -All Night Service
Lam Watta e Initial Lumens $/Lam /Month
150
250 16,000
27,500 $ 12.68
16.53
1. The charge per lamp reflects that 28.132% of the investor-owned utility energy
requirements are supplied by the California Department of Water Resources. This
percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Conditions
1. The Applicant shall instal] streetlights that will be served by the Utility. These
streetlights must be installed in accordance with the Utility's specifications and
the developer will deed such facilities to the City.
2. Requirements and Restrictions.
a. The Applicant for street light service shall specify the type of service,
lamp size, and location of street lights.
b. Service shall not be furnished under this Schedule where location,
mounting height, and/or other considerations are unacceptable to the
Utility.
c. The installation of street lighting equipment and facilities hereunder is
contingent upon the utility obtaining easements, and rights of way, as may
be required, satisfactory to the Utility for the required poles, lines,
equipment, and facilities.
d. Should the Applicant not commence using the street lighting in a bona fide
manner within ninety (90) days after date of completion and installation of
14 Effective Date: March I, 2008
P252
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTR]C RATES R TARIFFS
a street light or street lighting system requested by the Applicant, the
Utility will bill, and the Applicant shall pay, the applicable lamp
charges(s).
3. Hours of Service.
Under the Utility's standard all night operating schedule, approximately
4,140 hours of service per year will be furnished.
4. Maintenance.
The Utility shall exercise reasonable care and diligence in maintaining its
street light facilities or Utility-owned attachments thereto. Where the
Utility experiences, or expects to experience, maintenance costs exceeding
its normal maintenance expense resulting from, but not limited to,
vandalism, the Utility may require the customer to pay the excess
maintenance expense.
5. Liability of the Utility.
The Utility shall not, by taking action pursuant to its tariffs, be liable for
any loss, damage, or injury, established or alleged, which may result, or be
claimed to result, therefrom.
6. Removal, Relocation or Modification of Facilities.
Where street lighting service and facilities are ordered removed by a customer,
the customer shall pay to the Utility a nonrefundable amount equal to the total
estimated cost installed less any Customer contribution, plus the estimated cost of
removal less the estimated net salvage value of the facilities.
Where street lighting service and facilities were ordered removed by a Customer
and such service and facilities, or their equivalent are ordered reinstalled within
thirty-six (36) months from the date of the order to remove, the Customer shall
pay to the Utility in advance of reinstallation a nonrefundable amount equal to the
cost of removal of the prior facilities and the estimated cost of such reinstallation.
Where street lighting facilities are ordered modified and /or relocated by a
Customer, the Customer shall pay to the Utility, in advance of such modification
and/or relocation, a nonrefundable amount equal to the estimated cost of such
modification and/or relocation. This includes facilities that now serve street light
load only, but that may have been installed originally to serve other than street
light load.
Utility-owned facilities removed or installed remain the sole property of the
Utility.
15 Effective Date: March 1, 2008
P253
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
7. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above.
8. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
9. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F.
] 0. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
16 Effective Date: March 1, 2008
P254
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES ~ TARIFFS
TRAFFIC CONTROL
A. Applicability.
Applicable to single and three-phase service for traffic directional signs or traffic signal
systems located on streets, highways and other public thoroughfares and to railway
crossing and track signals; for public thoroughfare lighting that is utilized twenty-four
(24) hours per day or is not controlled by switching equipment, such as tunne] or
underpass lighting; and, to public authorities for the illumination of bus stop shelters
located in the dedicated road right-of--way where such service is combined with other
traffic control service as defined above.
B. Territory.
The entire ten•itory served.
C. Rates.
$/Traffic Si nal/Month $ 58.77
The energy charge reflects that 28.132% of the investor-owned utility energy
requirements are supplied b}' the California Department of Vl'ater Resources. This
percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Conditions
1. Voltage.
Service will be supplied at one (1) standard voltage not in excess of 240 volts or,
at the option of the Utility, at 240/480 volts, three wire, single-phase.
2. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rate and conditions above.
3. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
4. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF)
The rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F.
5. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.8~% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
17 Effective Date: March 1, 2008
P255
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RAILS & TARIFFS
OUTDOOR AREA LIGHTING
A. Applicability.
Applicable to single-phase service for metered outdoor area lighting load, controlled for
dusk to dawn operation and used for purposes other than street and highway lighting such
as, but not limited to parking lots, pedestrian walkways, billboards, building exteriors,
security, sports and recreation areas, monuments, decorative areas, and bus shelters.
B. Territory
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
Energy Charge - $/kWh/Meter/Month $ 0.07498
Customer Char e- $/Meter/Month 8.40
The energy charge reflects that 28.132% of the investor-owned utility energy
requirements are supplied by the California Department of Water Resources. This
percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Conditions
Voltage.
Service will be provided at one (1) standard voltage.
2. Three-Phase Service.
Where, in the sole opinion of the Utility, it is impractical to provide single-phase
service under this Schedule, three-phase service will be provided.
3. Separate Point of Delivery.
When requested by the Applicant or Customer, and agreed upon by the Utility, an
additional Point of Delivery may be provided, separate from any other Point of
Delivery provided under any other applicable Rate Schedule. Customers so
served shall not be permitted to have an electrical interconnection beyond the
Utility's Point of Delivery between the separately metered loads except upon
written approval of the Utility.
A change from this Schedule to any other Rate Schedule will be permitted if the
additional Point of Delivery is removed. Any such removal shall be at the
Customer's expense.
1 g Effective Date: March 1, 2008
P256
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
Any rearrangement of facilities required to provide the additional Point of
Delivery shall be at the expense of the requesting Applicant or Customer.
4. _ Controlled Operation.
Service under this Schedule requires the control of lamps in a manner acceptable
to the Utility so that lamps will not be lighted daily from dawn to dusk. Customer
shall install, own, operate, and maintain the control device. The Utility shall have
the right to periodically inspect the control device to ensure its correct operation
and maintenance.
5. Distribution Line Extension.
Distribution Line Extensions to reach an outdoor area light or area lighting system
shall be in accordance with Rule 15.
6. Services.
Services shall be installed and maintained as provided in Rule 16.
7. Incidental Loads.
Incidental, non-lighting loads may be served under this Schedule only where such
Connected Loads do not exceed fifteen percent (15) of the Customer's total
Connected Load. Incidental Loads must also be controlled for dusk to dawn
operation exclusively.
8. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The
charges are calculated b}' applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual
billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [kW], etc.).
9. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
10. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F.
1 1. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.8~% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
19 Effective Date'. Merch I,?008
P257
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A. Applicability.
Applicable where the Utility determines that 100% of the customer's electrical usage is
for limited irrigation service except for the Customer whose monthly Maximum Demand,
in the opinion of the Utility, is expected to exceed 20 kW or has exceeded 20 kW in any
three (3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for service under
this Schedule. Effective with the date of ineligibility of any Customer served under this
Schedule, the Customer's account shall be transferred to another applicable Rate
Schedule.
B. Territory.
The entire territory served.
C. Rates.
$/Irri ation S stem/Month $ 17.40
The energy charge reflects that 28.132% of the investor-owned utility energy
requirements are supplied by the California Department of Water Resources. This
percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Condition
Voltage.
Service will be supplied at one (1) standard voltage not in excess of 240 volts or,
at the option of the Utility, at 240/480 volts, three wire, single-phase.
2. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rate and conditions above.
3. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
4. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF).
The rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F.
5. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.8~% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
20 Effective Date: March 1,?008
P258
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT CHARGE
A. Applicability.
Applicable to General Service and Domestic Service customers.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
For each establishment of electric service .................................... $15.00
D. Special Conditions.
1. The service establishment charge provided for herein is in addition to the charges
calculated in accordance with the applicable schedule and may be made each time an
account is established. As used herein, establishment means each time an account is
opened, including a turn on of electric service or a change of name which requires a
meter reading.
2. In case the customer requests that electric service be established on the day of his
request or outside of regular hours, an additional charge of $9.00 may be made.
2I Effective Date: March I, 2008
P259
STAFF REPORT -
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
RANCHO
Date: April 16, 2008 C,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director
By: Flavio H. Nunez, Redevelopment Analyst, II
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND RELOCATION AND
RECONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT - DRC2008-00111 - LAMAR CENTRAL
OUTDOOR - AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR A BILLBOARD RELOCATION AND
RECONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT TO FACILITATE THE REMOVAL OF NINE
EXISTING BILLBOARDS AND RELOCATE ONE EXISTING BILLBOARD TO A
LOCATION ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND INTERSTATE
15 (12200 ARROW ROUTE [APN: 0229-021-65]). THIS RELOCATED BILLBOARD
WILL HAVE A TWO PANEL CHANGEABLE MESSAGE DIGITAL DISPLAY. THE
APPLICATION ALSO INCLUDES THE RECONSTRUCTION OF TWO EXISTING
BILLBOARDS GENERALLY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND FOOTHILL AVENUE (9670 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
[APN: 0208-153-05] AND 8076 ARCHIBALD AVENUE [APN: 0208-153-03]). THE
TWO EXISTING BILLBOARDS TO BE RECONSTRUCTED WILL INCLUDE ONE
PANEL ON EACH BILLBOARD WITH A CHANGEABLE MESSAGE DIGITAL
DISPLAY. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR CONSIDERATION
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached Resolution approving the environmental assessment and Billboard Relocation
and Reconstruction Agreement and making findings in support thereof to facilitate the removal of
nine existing billboards and relocate one existing billboard to a location on the northeast corner of
Arrow Route and Interstate 15 (12200 Arrow Route), and the reconstruction of two existing
billboards generally located near the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Foothill Avenue
(9670 Foothill Boulevard and 8076 Archibald Avenue).
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Lamar Central Outdoor (Lamar) owns and operates nine (9) legal non-conforming billboards
throughout the City (Please see Exhibit A - Lamar's Current Billboard Sign Locations). Lamar
approached staff with a proposed plan to remove their legal non-conforming signs in exchange for
constructing a digital display freeway oriented sign and reconstructing two existing billboards into
digital display signs (Please see Exhibit B -Proposed Digital Sign Locations). This will result in a
net decrease of six (6) legal non-conforming billboards throughout the community. Currently, the
City's sign ordinance does not provide for an approval process of digital display signs. However,
the California Outdoor Advertising Act, Business and Professions Code, Section 5200 empowers
and encourages local agencies through the use of ordinances and/or resolutions to enter into
relocation agreements with display owners without expenditure of public funds in terms agreeable
P260
r:~cs 2
Aran. 16. ?008
to both the local agency and display owners. Lamar's proposal to reduce the number of billboards
is consistent with the goals of the City's Municipal Code of decreasing these types of uses. The
proposal is also inline with the Foothill Specific Plan in terms of reducing the visual clutter and
improving the aesthetic appearances of the City.
The proposed digital display signs are computer controlled electronic billboards that transmit light
through the use of Light Emitting Diode (LED) technology. The digital display signs also include
built-in features that automatically dim and adjust during various lighting conditions to ensure there
would be no lighting/glare impacts. The proposed digital sign at the northeast corner of Arrow
Route and the I-15 will have two digital display panels. The two proposed digital signs generally
located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue will have one digital
display panel, and one static panel. The attached Exhibit C illustrates two conceptual renderings of
the proposed signs at each respective location. As provided in the Agreement, the City's Planning
Director shall review and approve the sign designs using the conceptual renderings as a guide. In
addition, the Agreement also provides for the City to receive advertisement privileges on each
digital sign. The City advertisement messages shall be limited to City events and activities, or non-
profit based public service messages.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
An Initial Study was prepared for the entire project and circulated for public review. Based on the
findings of the Initial Study, staff determined that with the requirement of mitigation measures there
is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Based
on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. The mitigation
requirements include the following:
There shall be no film clips and/or animation shown on the digital displays
• No display may change its message in less than four seconds
• There shall be no flashing, blinking or scrolling of images
There shall be no noise or sound emitted from the billboards
Respectfully submitted,
Cj~a.(..cdltJ ~,
Linda D. Daniels
Redevelopment Director
Attachments: - Exhibit A - Lamar's Current Billboard Sign Locations
- Exhibit B -Proposed Digital Sign Locations
- Exhibit C -Conceptual Renderings
- Mitigated Negative Declaration
~~
0
c~
0
.~
~~
oa
L
J
--w
~~~~~J ~
H
b
O
...
V
O
a
b
A a
z
~'
w
c7
w ~
a
8
a
•
~~
~lJ
0
0
Y'!
!"
L
Q.
V
J
t
s
~_
•~
V
P261
RESOLUTION NO. D $- o S 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A BILLBOARD RELOCATION
AND RECONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:0229-021-65 (12200 ARROW ROUTE); 0208-
153-05 (9670 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND 0208-153-03 (8076
ARCHIBALD AVENUE)
A. Recitals
1. Lamar Central Outdoor, Delaware Limited Liability Company ("Company') owns and
operates numerous legal non-conforming billboard advertising structure within the city limits of City
of Rancho Cucamonga, a public body, corporate and politic ("City");
2. The Company desires to relocate one existing Billboard and reconstruct two existing
Billboards with new Billboards incorporating Changeable Message digital displays;
3. The California Outdoor Advertising Act, Business and Professions Code, Section
5200, et. seq, encourages local entities and display owners to enter into relocation agreements
which allow local entities to continue development in a planned manner without expenditure of public
funds while allowing the continued maintenance of private investment and a medium of public
communications;
4. The California Outdoor Advertising Act specifically empowers local agencies to enter
into relocation agreements on whatever terms are agreeable to the City and display owners and to
adopt ordinances and resolutions providing relocation of displays;
5. City desires to reduce the number of Billboards within the City thereby reducing visual
clutter and improving the aesthetic appearance of City;
6. City and Company now wish to enter into an Agreement to memorialize the terms and
conditions upon which Company will have the right to relocate and reconstruct certain of its existing
Billboards.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 16, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this City Council hereby specifcally finds as follows:
a. This Development and Relocation and Reconstruction Agreement does promote
the goals and objectives of the Municipal Code; and
b. This Development and Relocation and Reconstruction Agreement would not be
materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact
on the environment nor the surrounding properties.
P262
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor
the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe projectwill have a
significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring
Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as
follows:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local
CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of
the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the
imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would
have a signifcant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative
Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment
period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all
comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record
before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA;
and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that
the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the
Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independentjudgmentsnd analysis of the City Council.
Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring
Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources
Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the
mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the project.
d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration,
Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings
upon which the City Council's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California
91730, telephone (909) 477-2750.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3, above, this
City Council hereby recommends approval of Billboard Relocation and Reconstruction Agreement.
6. The City Clerk shall testify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16`"day of April, 2008.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
_~ 3
~~ ~ f 6 r ~~
F<
`' - and uaneH -~.~.
J ~ k ' z
p. .~.~ „nA. 9 '.
ti. - ;v:
t~ ~ ~~
~ •~ amd~sowaaH:r~
M
JA' ~~ ...
I
f ~ ~ 1 1.
.d 11 .,~ ~ Y t.
li j- r
'~ ~~ ,~
I ~ ~p qe K ~• V , , ~d
4 y,~p, L ~ ~. . ~' ~` o
~y` ¢~' •
~ ' '~ ~ ,
Z II 4~.: M
a ~ , .~.1
UO a .i. r
J ~ ..r3 ~ Y f I:~}
U' a _.. { ~ ~. ~
Q Q ',~ gk1~l~ ~ ~ f F{ i ~ N lir X n
m m fl ~ .y .
J ~ +i. 1
= m ~~ ~ ~ ,x ,..~ Y and uew~~aH'
11.1 ~ Gu{,~•1~p1~ 1 4~i ri.~~ *n'{~ I~n`
~ 7S i~zi ~i P.:'~ __.
U ~ 't t' ~ ., a Ya ~ i' i xl' .N'.
re-
tar m ~~ ~, cl .. z. 11 I''L"
~; o ', 5'
g fiKi`~ ,° 'T 1~~
i1 r
.! _.
~`~
_ ~
,
:~ ~.5
~1 , ~ ~ l
i, '
.~ '~ Y~,.NytBri'o-' +n ~,
»a. :7:' -
Z 224
~,l ` •,~~
n I ~L
V- ~
+~
U ~, s"t. .. I ~[C I b t
••
~~ w.l ~t~ ~! ~~
~ I.- r ~ I ~ ~~r
U and anoaJ - ~~ . =;-, .
P263
~~_, P264
~ ~~~~
1 ' ,. CI.~
~ ~~ -~.~.
NOOllf19 NVWOaVM - ~e `
I ~,
~~
~p
I z
~ I ( \~
~_
..
..
i
y`\ I ~' 1
..
ELWANDQ\ ~~-.-. ETIWANDA_ i
I ~
i YI `r!,
[•..
1
z. ~ j
_ I -1- ~ ,_~~_ ~ _~~ ~~ 1
~ 1,~II/ ; N33iJ0 AVO
Z ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 7 ~~ ~ 1 A ~ VliNtl V1NVS
I
_-- _.
~ 1 III a31si H~oa
v0 1 I ~.--~' 1
~ 1 ~ ~~~ 1"~~~ ~..~_ a} ~~L..... 1
~ 1 ... _,,I_1 i ........ ~i~.MILLIKEN.. Z \ \ / 1 _I w .......
m a 1 I 1~ w! 1 E,!-~ (I ~ i q
m~ 1 ~ ( I ~~ ~' f `r~~- ~
..___-_
z p it ~~ - ---~(~-_~~-~~ ~ _ I j
~ '- ~ - J ~ _ ~ _ ..-.1
~ .... 3 .. I ..-_. NII I VSORCHIB LD -.. ~ O ._..~
O ~ ~ N p o z 1
I
-__. 1 -~...- AMETHYST YV'j._..-_...... I S r j
1 _ J._L-- --HELLMAN_-rt_.- ~ i-
1 ___ I I' - BERYL ~ i
_.
W ~ - 1
~ °- I °' aavn3mv\
1 - m~~I ~ R~ LIB I r
1 SAB2 z 'I ' ~ 1
HIRE ~ ` \` ~ -.---
1__1 ~ ~1 ~__-a__- ~-_=_.l
L. ~/
1 1 . . . . _ I
n
m
ri
N E
-O
O ~
N N
o`~ - ° ~ aai o~ a
Z z O ~ 'o ~~~ a ~- w U ~°
~,~1 ~`J~ z mN m~ ~, naNi~ H
`~-1C7' J FiM ~ W x O U D) C N p m 01 N 3
~y r ~ J W a~~~ ~ n Z -o -p ~ u~ L L d
`J • ~ V
d
C
C
P265
Exhibit - C
Conceptual Renderings
The above illustration is the proposed conceptual rendering for the digital signs generally located at the
northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald. This sign will incorporate the Route 66 shield as
identified in the Visual Improvement Plan.
The above illustration is the proposed conceptual rendering for digital sign generally located at the
northeast corner of Arrow Route and I-15 Freeway.
P266
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DRC2008-00111
Public Review Period Closes: April 16, 2008
Project Name: Project Applicant: Lamar Advertising
Project Location (also see attached map): Locations included in project description. See below.
Project Description: An environmental review for a Billboard Relocation and Reconstruction
Agreement to facilitate the removal of nine existing billboards (10411 26th Street, 9445 Foothill
Boulevard, 8411 Foothill Boulevard, 8133 Foothill Boulevard, and 8230 Foothill Boulevard) and
relocate one existing billboard to a location on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and the
Interstate 15 Freeway (12200 Arrow Route [APN:0229-021-65]). This relocated billboard will have a
two-panel changeable message digital display. The application also includes the reconstruction of
two existing billboards generally located near the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and
Foothill Avenue (9670 Foothill Boulevard [APN:0208-153-05] and 8076 Archibald Avenue
[APN: 0208-153-03]). The two existing billboards to be reconstructed will include one panel on
each billboard with a changeable message digital display.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not
be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial
Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax
(909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the
review period.
April 16. 2008
Date of Determination
Adopted By
•k5
T I
~~r\NCHO
CUCAAIONCA
CURRENT LAMAR BILLBOARD SIGN LOCATIONS
I
l
I
~~
~ ~QOSCd
~~~~1G ~~LrYld~~ 1161
rr-ton~truoH~ Sites)
See I,o~atta- ~1'h~p .~r ~dikte~ S~'c(S)
ILL
__
--; i ----; ~-- gl ;
~- i 3 ~ ~ ~ @ -c^
E
I _d ~ ,~
~ ~ F_ i ~ ->
_,.~ _
~ ~ ~ ~ 6 E ;'
.•, 'uaRtl I k ~ ~ ~1
'Hi{ ~ ~ 1
~.
of I ~ ~ 1 r , ' r'~Y ~
P268
z
O
Q
U
O
J
O J
>~l~ l1 U O
~U
~9 2 <
I\
1 ~
-----~
1 `\'
r NCOllf19 NVW02lHM
I
I Z
3.
EAST ~,~~~.,_~~__~~~1
I
I
I ETIWANDA ;
. ETIWANDA_ _. . I~.~ ~ ~ ~
'z '
i~ ~ Fes-
m ~ '°
. -.__ -
N33aD AVd ~ I
~ ,' I HlINtl V1NVSI
~~~ ~1
~, p
,,
- I ~,
i, 2131S3HDOL1! i - I
_I
I I
~;
-
~ I
I
r O
I
I
S
` MILLIKEN -- _.. I -.. I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
I .
r _- ,_ __ ; ¢ w
( , ' ~
~i z~ i 5
a J: 1 q
' a
w_ -
- I
~ Q'
I I.
; m; . ,
I f --.
.. L_.._. - ___ _
1 ____N3AHH -- ~ ~
' i 1 J i I
i
J I , I ~ LL H
' I
- 3 i4 ~ ARCHIBALD =_ tO __
I---- -- - - _
~ _
I AMETHYST ''
! ~ m '
_ . __
I ~
I HELLMAN __ _.. ___.
i-
-_ _ _ __ ~
I
I . _
.._.. ' ;BERYL
~ _ ~~
~
w
I lx
~
I
~ °
'
^' ~ - dJdA3NlA
I ~ 4' CARNELIAN
-
- m I
J _. } _.. _
I
= z'
..___
I m .. ~ ~= I
~
I SAPPHIRE . . ? '
~ I
I_~l I _~ t_ _~ ~~ J
~~ ~ i
1 ~
N
a p
c0 Ul ,n
o a a ~,
~ >.
a
~ O d f0
~o.~ N
fn
oaa
~'
O
~a ~ wa
a~-
N
U
N
`~ _
Q~
W ina ~
~' N fl- O .~ O) 3
~ C
7
•
Clty o/Rancho Cucenwnga
Planning DNislon
(908)477-2750
ENVIRONMENTAL
INFORMATION FORM
(Part I -Initial Study)
(Please type or print cleady using ink. Use the tab key to move tram one line t0 the next line.)
The purpose of#his
pr'ojectso thatthe C
Guldelmes,' the .C:~
toinform the Clty of the tie
.review the firolect,pursuan`
~mponents.~fthe~coposed I
,. .
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note thatlt fs the respons/blllty of the applicant to ensure that
the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be avallab/e to perform work required fo provide missing
information.
Application Number for the project to which this form pertains:
Project Title: 1~L_
Name & Address of project owner(s):
Name 8 Address of developer or project sponsor:
P269
I:V°CANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTERIInitial Study Part1.docPage 1 Rev. 311714
~P270
Contact Person & Address:
U
- ~I O
~~
Name & Address of person preparing this form (d different from above):
Telephone Number:
`1} Provide a full scale (8-1R x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate
the site boundaries.
2) Provide a set o! color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and
west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; end representative views of
significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph.
3)~~ Project Location (describe): nn
5 ~' i ~ 7 F.il~ Fki?i~. n.. + ~~P
4) ~ssessor's Parcel Numbers (attach addltiona! sheet if necessary): ~ ,1 e"LZ9 - 021 - L: S - G n e e
Z,l ozog-~53-c;5-ooea
a,~ ozs>e, -i5~-o3-aT:c:a
`6j~° moss Stte Area (ac/sq. ft.): I ~1 I ~ (1~=, ..~
'6) Net Sife Area (total site size minu's area o(pubfic streets & proposed J
dedications): ~/ f~
7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site
(attach additional sheet if necessary):
LIP CANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER1lnitial Study Part1.docPage 2 Rev. 3(1)ID4
Information indicated by ari asterisk (`) is not required of nonconstruction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff.
P271
8J Include adescription ofa/I permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovernmenta/
agencies in order to fully implement the project:
g) Describe the physical setting of the sffe as ii exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability,
plants and animals, mature trees, Veils and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features
' described, In addition, cite all sources ofinformation (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archedogica!
surveys, traffic studies):
22cs~ C' - d S 6Li n V~
S~ ~.r~u aP G~'L ~'2~n~aSP .
G t ~f a 1=.~~: ~~ I~I ~a ~ 2 ~ Lc~..~:,u~c~~" c~.~.uv.e ~i~ ~ S-~[e.-,~-~-tu?~s
~~
1OJ Describe the known cu/tu21 and/orhistorical aspects of the site. Cite all sources ofinformation (books, published reports
and oral history): -
1.\PtANNINGIFINALIFORM5I000NTc R\Initial Stutly Partl.docPage 3 Rev. 3117104
P272
il) Describeanynoisesourcesandtheirlevelsthatnowatfectthesite(aircraft,roadwaynoise,etc.)andhowfheywillaBect
proposed uses:
12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use
that will result from the proposed project. Indicate i/ there are proposed phases for development, the extent of
development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additions! sheet(s) it
necessary:
IlF1G 7 ~Y~~rilnni ~;IIf7f'`i47?i/~ ~~ ~~~1~ ~J~ill FNIP A-fAU
b ~~
13) Descdbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment
houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc:
r ~ l I I it I I
i V~c'1.iLS \121.W1 `Pct IIS C~.~ I
14) lMll the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project?
1:1PLANNINGIFINAL(FORMS\COUNTERIfnitial Study Partl.docPage 4 Rev. 3117104
P273
15) Indicate the type o1 short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise
levels aKect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods o1 soundproofing are proposed?
`l6) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: N l~
I4/~
a. Residential (gal/day)
17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into wh/ch the site drains: ~~
18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please
contact the Cucamonga Vafley Wafer District at 987-2591.
Peak use (gal/Day)
J b. Commercial/Ind. (gaf/day/ac) Peak use (gaUmin/ac) .
~1f, /~ 19) Indicate proposed methodof sewage disposal. ~ ^ Septic Tank ^ Sewer.
/ If septic tanks are proposed, attach peroolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate
expected daNy sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clamsration, please contact the
Cucamongp.Valley Water DisMct at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day)
b. Commercial/Industrial (gel/day/ac)
/~-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS:
20) Number of residential units: _
Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: ~ ~~~
Attached (indicate whether units are rental or fw sale units): ~~ /7f
I:V~LANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERVnitial Smdy Partl.docPage 5
Rev. 3n7/D4
P274
~f /A 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents:
Sale Price{s) $ fo $
Renl (per month) $ fo $
22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: ~~
23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type:
~1~24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School
Districts as shown in Attachment B:
a. Elementary:
b. Junior High: _
/ c. Senior High
~/~ COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL. AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS
25) Describe type of use(s) and ma%or function(s) of commercial, industrra! or institutional uses:
26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: ~ l~
27) Indicate hours o1 operation: ~ /,/t
28) Number of employees: ~ ~~ Total:
Maximum Shift:
Time of Maximum Shift:
I:\PLANNING\PINAL\FORMSICOUNicR\Initial Sludy Partl.docPage 6 Rev. 3/17104
P275
29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the 2te of
hire for each classification (attach additional sheet If necessary):
30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: ~ lf~-
'31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of airpollution emissions. (Data should be
verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283):
~/
,9LL PROJECTS
32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to
provide adequate service to the proposed project? Jf so, please indicate their response.
>u I>4
33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matedals?
Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; 2dioactive substances; pesticides and
herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and otherflammeble liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any ofthe above.
Please list the materials and descdbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it
known.
I:\PLANNINGVFINAL\FORMSICOUNTE R1lnitial Study ParttdocPage 7 Rev. 3/17/04
P276
34) lMll the proposed project involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/ortoxic matedals,
including but not limited-to those examples fisted above? /f yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and
proposed method of disposal. The'location of such uses, a/ong with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and
labeled on the application plans.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for
adequate evaluation of this project fo the best ofmy ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct
tot he best of my knowledge and belief. 1 further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an
adequate evaluation ran be made by the City bf Rancho Cucamonga.
Itte: Signature: ,a.~/~,,.~.~-_- ~ ~ ~
ree: <~A / ~J%4~~: n~ ire.. ,t-r ~
I:NLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial SNdy Part9.docPage 8 Rev. 3/17!04
P277
HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE STATEMENT
I have been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga of my responsibilities
pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5 (copy attached) to notify the City
as to whether the site for which a development application has been submitted is located
within an area which has been designated as the location of a hazardous waste site by the
Office of Planning and Research, State of Califomia (OPR).
I have also been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, as of the date of
executing this Statement, OPR has not yet compiled and distrubted a list of hazardous
waste sites as required by said Section 65962.5.
I am informed and believe that the proposed site for which a development
application has been submitted is.not within any area specified-in said Section 65962.5 as
a hazardous waste site.
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Califomia that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: ,~ /i h
~ _ ~z
PPlicant
P278
BACKGROUND
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
Project File: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DRC2006-00111 - LAMAR ADVERTISING - An
environmental review for a Billboard Relocation and Reconstruction Agreement to facilitate the
removal of nine existing billboards (10411 26th Street, 9445 Foothill Boulevard,
6411 Foothill Boulevard, 8133 Foothill Boulevard, and 8230 Foothill Boulevard) and relocate one
existing billboard to a location on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and the Interstate 15
Freeway (12200 Arrow Route (APN: 0229-021-65]). This relocated billboard will have atwo-panel
changeable message digital display. The application also includes the reconstruction of two
existing billboards generally located near the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and
Foothill Avenue (9670 Foothill Boulevard [APN: 0208-153-05) and 8076 Archibald Avenue
[APN: 0208-153-03]). The two existing billboards to be reconstructed wilt include one panel on
each billboard with a changeable message digital display.
necrrinrinn of Billboard Removal and Relocation
Removal Relocation Re lace
9 throughout the City One pole at 12200 Arrow Route One pole at 9670 Foothill
Permanent removal: 'two-panel changeable message Boulevard
"10411 26th Street digital display 'one-panel changeable
'9445 Foothill Boulevard messa a di ital dis la
"8411 Foothill Boulevard (2) One pole 8076 Archibald
"8133 Foothill Boulevard Avenue
`8230 Foothill Boulevard "one-panel changeable
messa a di ital dis la
Cummarv of I amar Advertising's Billboard Removal and Relocation Project
Prior to Project After Project
Total Number of Lamar's Advertising
Billboards 9 3
Net Decrease - 6
2. Description of Project: An environmental review to facilitate the removal of nine existing
billboards and relocate one existing billboard to a location on the northeast corner of Arrow Route
and the 1-15 Freeway. This relocated billboard will have atwo-panel changeable message digital
display. The application also includes the reconstruction of two existing billboards located at
9670 Foothill Boulevard and 8076 Archibald Avenue. The two existing billboards to be
reconstructed will include one panel on each billboard with a changeable message digital display.
3. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Brian C. Smith
Lamar Advertising Company
24541 Redlands Boulevard
Loma Linda, CA 92354
4. General Plan Designation for relocated/reconstructed billboards:
• 12200 Arrow Route -General Industrial
• 9670 Foothill Boulevard and 8076 Archibald Avenue -Mixed Use
P279
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2008.00111 Page 2
5. Zoning for relocated/reconstructed billboards:
• 12200 Arrow Route -General Industrial (Subarea 8)
9670 Foothill Boulevard and 8076 Archibald Avenue -Specialty Commercial
6. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: One existing billboard will be relocation to the northeast
corner of Arrow Route and the I-15 Freeway (12200 Arrow Route). The subject site at
12200 Arrow Route contains a commercial/industrial warehouse structure and is in an area
developed with industrial and freeway uses. The proposal on the site at 12200 Arrow Route
includes the installation of a relocated billboard with atwo-panel changeable message digital
display. This billboard will be approximately 40 feet high and visible from the I-15 Freeway.
The application also includes the reconstruction of two existing billboards located at
9670 Foothill Boulevard and 8076 Archibald Avenue. These two properties abut one another and
are located in an area that is disturbed and developed with commercial uses. The two existing
billboards at 9670 Foothill Boulevard and 8076 Archibald Avenue will be reconstructed to include
one panel on each billboard with a changeable message digital display. These replacement
billboards will not exceed the height of the existing billboards that will be removed.
The billboards to be removed are located in areas that are mostly urbanized and heavily traveled by
vehicles.
Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency
Planning Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
8. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Rina Leung
Senior Planner
(909) 477-2750
9. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement):
• Caltrans (San Bernardino County)
GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report:
CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District
EIR -Environmental Impact Report
FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report
NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NOx -Nitrogen Oxides
ROG -Reactive Organic Gases
PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter
RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District
SW PPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G
P280
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 3
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
(X) Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources (X) Air Quality
()Biological Resources (X) Cultural Resources (X) Geology & Soils
(X) Hazards &' Waste Materials (X) Hydrology & Water Quality (X) Land Use & Planning
()Mineral Resources (X) Noise ()Population & Housing
OPublic Services ORecreation (X) Transportation/Traffic
()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Si nificance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
() I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or
agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
() I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
() I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially
Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets.
An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
() I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Prepared By: ~~~~~~~~ i Date: ~ I ~ ~~
Reviewed By: !`~d~ [.eu/y/ Date: / ~O ~~
P281
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 4
Leas roan
Sipnir¢ant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g '°tenually
Signllicent w""
Mitigation Than
Sipniflcant
No
mgac: nc°rooratetl Irnnatl T-azl
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? () () () (/)
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/)
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State Scenic Highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () (/) ( )
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () (/) () ( )
which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in
the area?
Comments:
a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project sites. The project will not view
corridors according to General Plan Exhibit III-15.
b) Although the property at 9670 Foothill Boulevard includes a structure that the City may be
interested in designating as a local landmark in the future, the proposal, which includes the
replacement of a billboard on the site, will not affect the existing structure. There are no State
Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
c) The project sites are located in areas characterized by industrial, freeway, and commercial uses.
The visual quality of the area will not be degraded as a result of this project. City standards require
the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly
appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission
Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution.
Although the project will include the relocation of one billboard, replacement of two existing
billboards, and the removal of nine billboards, the proposed Billboard Relocation and
Reconstruction Project will permanently remove six existing billboards throughout the City with the
objective of reducing visual clutter by reducing the number of billboards located within the City;
thereby, improving the City's appearance as a whole.
To ensure that there would be no impacts to light and glare, a mitigation measure has been
imposed to require that all associated equipmenUcabinets be screened by mature
landscaping and set back from the public rights-of-way.
d) Although the project includes the installation of billboards (one relocated and two replaced) with a
total of four changeable message digital displays, these digital displays include built-in features that
automatically dim and adjust during various lighting conditions to ensure that there would be no
lighting/glare impacts.
In order to ensure that there would be no impacts to Light and glare, a mitigation measure
has been imposed to require a dimming feature, which automatically adjusts between night
and day views, to be installed for all digital displays.
P282
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 5
Less Tnen
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp g Ppfan"ally
Signifificam With
Mciga~ion Than
Signitlcam
Np
mDaCf ncOrOpfa@tl mpad rroaC:
2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or O O U (/)
Farmland. of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/)
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/)
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
Comments:
a) The project sites are not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance., The project sites are located in an urbanized area. There are
approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or
committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of
designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of the City that is
characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated
farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is
doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use
Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant
unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately
adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which
the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated.
b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no
Williamson Act contracts within the City.
c) The project sites are in areas that are characterized by development. The subject sites tend to be
developed with buildings and do not have any established agricultural uses. Therefore, no adverse
impacts are anticipated.
3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
()
()
()
(/)
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( )
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/)
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors?
P283
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 6
Less Tnen
Slgnificent Lass
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Ptlfennaoy
Si9nilicant wm
Mitigation Tnan
Slgnisant
No
Inpan Inmmoraletl Imoect Irtgad
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? () () () (/)
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people? () () () (/)
Comments:
a) The removal of nine existing billboards, relocation of one billboard, and reconstruction of two
billboards would not conflict with the applicable air quality plan.
b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, construction vehicles,
construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust is
associated with construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project
site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the
surrounding area. However, these impacts would be considered short-term and no residual air
quality impacts would remain after construction. The contractor will be required to comply with air
quality rules and regulations to minimize impacts to air quality. The following mitigation measures
shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels:
1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to
reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction
equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'
specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City
verification.
2) The developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed
schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide
evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that
their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall
also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCADMD) as well as City Planning staff.
3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD
Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume,
low-pressure spray.
4) All asphalt materials shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCA~MD
Rule 1108.
5) All constructioh equipment shall comply with SCA~MD Rules 402 and 403.
Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions:
• Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and
watering.
Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
• Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over
extended periods of time.
• Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during
and after the end of work periods.
P284
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 7
Less Tnan
9pnificem less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP 9 amemieur
sipwman~ wun
Mnipa~mn than
slpnnman~
No
Imnan Incoroore~etl Impart Imoaci
• Dispose of surplus excavated materials in accordance with state and local
ordinances and use sound engineering practices.
• Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried
over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing
may vary depending upon time of year of construction.
• Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding
25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements.
• Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover
payloads using tarps or other suitable means..
6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by
SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Fine
Particulate Matter (PM~p) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all
inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p
emissions.
8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered
equipment where feasible.
9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction plans include a statement
that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use.
c) Although, trips will continue to be generated in order to maintain the billboards, these trips are not
anticipated to be significant. The removal of nine billboards citywide would result in an overall
decrease of number of trips needed for maintenance.
d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution
than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors:
long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes,
residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the
SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile
of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401.
Once the billboards are removed/constructed, they will not significantly increase traffic trips. The
mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels.
e) The proposed project uses will not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/)
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/)
or other sensitive natural communit identified in local
P285
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 8
Less Tnan
Sipniticam Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g aplannany
Sipnilicanl w..n
Mitigation Tnan
Slgnilicant
No
Imoetl In°orporatatl Impact Impact
or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the
California Depanment of Fish and Game or US Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/)
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any. native () () () (/)
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/)
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/)
Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation
Plari, or other approved local, regional, or State
habitat conservation plan?
Comments:
a) The proposed project sites are currently developed and have been disturbed by landscaping
maintenance. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan
FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, the project
will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that
the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use
Plan.
b) The project sites are located in urbanized areas with no natural communities. No riparian habitat
exists on the sites, meaning the project will not have any impacts.
c) No wetland habitat is present on the sites. As a result, project implementation would have no
impact on these resources.
d) The site and majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed/urbanized, thereby
disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
e) The proposed project will not involve the removal of any heritage trees on the project site;
therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance.
f) The project sites are not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open
Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur.
P286
Initial Study for
DRC2006-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 9
' Less roan
Signif¢anl Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pP 9 Pmencauy
s~emncap, wnp
Mingabnn reap
s~gm:mam
Np
' ImpaO In..'prpotaletl Impact ImDx,
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the O O U (/)
significance of a historical resource as defined in
§ 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( )
significance of an archeological resource pursuant to
§ 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( )
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/)
outside of formal cemeteries?
Comments:
a) Although the property at 9670 Foothill Boulevard includes a structure that the City may be .
interested in designating as a local landmark in the future, the proposal, which includes the
replacement of a billboard on the site, will not affect the existing structure. There are no State
Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the
Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the
General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly soil excavation and
compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources.
The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: ,
1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading
or earth moving activities, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor
construction activities and to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them
for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga
will:
Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or
significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its
archaeological value.
• Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites
within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point.
• Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area.
Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to
minimize project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric
resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines.
• Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory,
evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit
one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San
Bernardino County Archaeologicallnformation Center for permanent archiving.
c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial
fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have
been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga dr the sphere-of-influence, including the
P287
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 10
less Tnan
Significant Lass
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Ptl,anraoy
Sipnilicam wun
Mitigation roan
Signilicant
No
Imoact Incorpore~atl Imoad Imgaq
project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older
alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000
years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and
the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project
site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following
mitigation measures shall be implemented:
2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or
during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor
construction activities and to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them
for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide
specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological
monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the
program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures:
. Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid
removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the
interval of earth-disturbing activities.
• Should fossils be 'found within an area being cleared or graded, divert
earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If
construction personnel makes the discovery, the grading contractor should
immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find.
• Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation , in the
summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino
County Museum).
• Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected
specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum.
d) The proposed project sites are in areas that have been disturbed by development. No known
religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project
site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Cqde (Section 7050.5)
states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the
County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources
Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no
mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse
impacts are anticipated.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/)
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
P288
Initial Study for
~RCZOOa-oo 111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 11
Less Than
Signilicant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp g Pp,encany
Significant wim
Miugalion Than
Significant
Np
Imheci Inrorparatetl Impact Imoac~
ii) Strong seismic.ground shaking? O O O (/)-
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/)
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? O O O (/)
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (/) () ( )
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/)
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/)
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/)
of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
Comments:
a) No known faults pass through the project sites where the relocated/reconstruction structures will be
located. These structures will not be located in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along
the Red Hill Fault, according to the Genefal Plan Exhibit V-1, and Seciion 5.1 of the General Plan
FEIR. Although the Red Hill Fault and Cucamonga Fault Zone are within the City boundaries, they are
not located within the project sites. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0 to 7.0
earthquakes. Upon the issuance of building permits, the applicant will be responsible for complying
with the latest Building Codes adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. No impacts are anticipated.
b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to
April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction
activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary
problems of dust control. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be
implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels:
1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by
SCAOMD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PMtp emissions, in accordance with SCAoMD
Rule 403.
2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City
to reduce PMtp emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may
vary depending upon time of year of construction.
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize
PMtp emissions from the site during such episodes.
4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RWQCB) shall be applied to ail
inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p
emissions.
P289
Initial Study for
D R C2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 12
Less Than
9gnilicant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g P°'e"'lallY
signamam wnh
Mmgauon Than
$ignliicam
No
mpeC~ InCO/pO~H~atl mpap~ Impact
c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large
decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the
existing aquifer, The project sites are not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable
geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5,1-2. No negative impacts are
anticipated.
d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project sites, is located on alluvial soil deposits.
These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site for the
replacement/relocation sites consists of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam and Tujunga Loamy sand
soils according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils are
typically somewhat permeable. No negative impacts are anticipated.
e) The Billboard Relocation and Reconstruction Project will not create wastewater; thus, they will not
need to be connected to any sewers or septic tanks.
7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create 'a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/)
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/)
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/)
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/)
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () (/) () ( )
where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/)
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/)
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/)
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
P290
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 13
Less roan
Slpniilcam Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp g a«epGany
Slpnilicam won
idliipeiion roan
sipniticam
No
Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact
Comments:
a) The proposed project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The
City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous
Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City is in the process
of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City
has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. No
negative impacts are expected.
b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous material or volatile fuels. The City
participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous
Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the
process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements.
The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal
approvals. No negative impacts are expected.
c) Although there is an existing elementary school located within 1/4 mile of the project sites
(9670 Foothill Avenue and 8076 Archibald Avenue), the proposed Billboard Relocation and
Reconstruction Project will not involve hazardous waste. IVo negative impacts are anticipated.
d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials sites. A recent site
inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous
materials. No impact is anticipated..
e) The project sites are not located within an airport land use plan and are not within 2 miles of a
public airport.
In order to mitigate for any potential impacts, the proposed Billboard Relocation and
Reconstruction Project will be required as a mitigation measure to comply with any
applicable Federal Aviation Administration policies/regulations. No Impact is anticipated.
f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the
City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated.
g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and
procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster.
The proposed Billboard Relocation and Reconstruction Project will comply with all applicable City
codes, including local fire ordinances. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban W ildland
Intertace area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan
2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area
according to General Plan Exhibit V-7.
P291
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 14
Less Than
Signilicanl Less
Issues and Su Ortln Information Sources:
Pp g Pptanrauy
sie~irmant Wnh
Mitigation than
sigmticam
ko
' Impact Incoroorate0 Impa^.t Impact
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (/) () ( )
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/)
substantially with groundwater recharge such that
there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the
production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would
drop to a level which would not support existing land
uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/)
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/)
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase
the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, ,
which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/)
the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (/)
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/)
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/)
that would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/)
loss, injury or death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? O O O (/)
Comments:
a) The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The
General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity,
requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control
Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region,
administers these permits. The following mitigation measures should be implemented to ensure
that impacts to water quality are less-than-significant.
P292
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 15
Less Tnan
SipniLCant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp g P°'°"'la'lY
sipnulcam w°°
Mulpauon Tnan
sipmrcant
Ho
Imoacl InmlporaWd Itroact Impact
Construction Activities:
1) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used
to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other
runoff.
2) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to
storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent
discharge of debris or sediment from the site.
b) According to the Cucamonga Valley Water District, 43 percent of the City's water is currently
provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master
plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete
groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with groundwater recharge because it is not within an area
designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-'L. The
development of the site will not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet
below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued
development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVWD has
plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities.
c) The project will not cause significant changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate
and amount of surface water nor will the project alter the course of any stream or river. Therefore,
the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore no impacts are
anticipated.
d) The project will not cause significant changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate
and amount of surface water nor will the project alter the course of any stream or river.
e) The project will not cause significant changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate
and amount of surface water nor will the project alter the course of any stream or river. The project
will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Therefore, increase in runoff from
the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated.
g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected.
h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan
Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected.
The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to
convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated
approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams
and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm
drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-5. The project sites are not located within a 100-year
flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V•5. No negative impacts are expected.
There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project sites; therefore, impacts from seiche and
tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern
San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made
controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance
within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and
spreading grounds both within and north of the City. No impacts are expected.
P293
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 16
Less Than
Slpnificanl Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Folanrauy
Slpniticant wlh
Miligafion Than
$Ignilicant
No
Impact Incomorared Imoxcl Impact
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
()
()
()
(/)
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () (/) ( )
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not limited to, a general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/)
or natural community conservation plan?
Comments:
a) The relocation of a billboard to 12200 Arrow Route and the replacements of two billboards at
9670 Foothill Boulevard and 8076 Archibald Avenue will not physically divide the community. The.
proposed Billboard Relocation and Reconstruction Project will be compatible with the existing uses.
No adverse impacts are anticipated.
b) The proposed Billboard Relocation and Reconstruction Projeci includes the removal of nine
billboards, replacement of two billboards, and relocation of a billboard. This project will result in a
net decrease of six billboards throughout the community, which is consistent with the spirit of the
Municipal Code of decreasing these types of uses. The proposed Billboard Relocation and
Reconstruction Project does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. The
California Outdoor Advertising Act empowers/encourages local agencies to enter into Relocation
Agreements with display owners and adopt ordinances and resolutions providing for relocation of
displays. The project will reduce the number of billboards within the City; thereby, reducing visual
clutter and improving the aesthetic quality of the City. As such, less-than-significant impacts are
anticipated.
c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area.
According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project
sites are not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not
adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the
project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use
Plan.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/)
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/)
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Comments:
a) The proposed project sites are not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to
the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact.
P294
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 17
Less Than
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp g Fmen:iany
Signi:icant wun
Mlligalion Than
Signi:icern
No
mOaC~ ncorgoraietl mgecl Impact
b) The proposed project sites are not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as
a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact.
11. NOISE: Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () () () (/)
excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/)
ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () (/) ( )
levels in the project vicinity-above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( )
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/)
where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/)
would the project expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels?
Comments:
a) The proposed project consists of removing, replacing, and relocating billboards will not expose
people to noise levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan or Municipal Code.
No adverse impact expected.
b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As
such, no impacts are anticipated.
c) Although the application includes the removal, reconstruction, and relocation of billboards
throughout the community, the applicant has indicated that construction equipment, which is
comprised of cranes and augers, tends to not produce a significant amount of noise. The applicant
stated that construction does not involve the use of a pile driver or other types of noisy equipment.
Once the use is established, the site is not anticipated to create noise; thus, noise impacts are
considered less-than-significant.
d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary
sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise
exceeding City standards. Although this type of construction Is not anticipated to create a
significant amount of noise, the following measures are provided to mitigate any short-term noise
impacts:
P295
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 18
Less Tnan
$ignilicant Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g a^teniially
SlgniUCam wan
Mitigavon Tnan
Significant
No
Imnacl Incorpolaletl ImDdct Impacl
1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and
6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national
holiday.
2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in
Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The
developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified
in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by
the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official
within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the
consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the
above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of
compliance with above noise standards or halted.
The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site
construction equipment; however, do not address the. potential impacts because of the
transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then
be required:
3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m.
on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday.
Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting
both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise
Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible,
the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential
dwellings.
e) The sites are not located within an airport land use plan and are not within 2 miles of a public
airport. All billboards will need to comply with the Federal Aviation Administration requirements.
No impact is anticipated.
The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the
City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/)
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/)
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/)
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Comments:
a) The project will be located in areas that are developed/urbanized and will not induce population
growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to
the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will not be associated with patrons or employees;
P296
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 19
Less Tnen
Significant Less
Issues and Su ortm Information Sources:
pp g Ppfanually
5pnillcant with
Muigation Than
Significant
No
fmoad nc^moratetl mLact Impact
hence, it will not create a demand for additional housing. Other than routine repair and
maintenance by a technician, the use is not anticipated to induce additional trips/visits. No impacts
are anticipated.
b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected.
c) The project site is not currently utilized for housing. No impacts are anticipated.
13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order
to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? () () () (~)
b) Police protection? () () () (~)
c) Scfipols? O O O (~)
d) Parks? U O O (~)
e) Other public facilities? () () () (~)
Comments:
a) The relocated billboard to be located at 12200 Arrow Highway would be served by Fire Station
#174 located approximately 1 1/2 mile from this project site. The existing billboards to be replaced
at Foothill Avenue and Archibald Avenue would be served by Fire Station #172 located
approximately 500 feet from these properties. The project will not require the construction of any
new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which
could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform
Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No
impacts are anticipated.
b) Additional police protection is not required as the project will not change the pattern of uses within
the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the
project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled.
c) The project will not create a significant impact to schools.
d) The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing
facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new
facilities. No impacts are anticipated.
e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The project sites are in a developed area,
currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of
any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service,
which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho
Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR
(Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the
projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a
P297
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 20
Less Than
Signilicam Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Pmen:ially
Significant wun
Mlagauon Tnan
Signiliwnt
No
Imoecl Incomoraletl Imoan Impact
significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was
ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan
for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. After the adoption of the General Plan, the
City built a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately
22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of
the City.
14. RECREATION. Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/)
regional parks or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
b) .Does the project include .recreational facilities or () () () (/)
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
Comments:
a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This project is
not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the
use of parks or other recreational facilities. No impacts are anticipated.
b) See a) response above.
15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/)
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/)
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or
highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/)
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () (/) () ( )
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/)
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/)
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/)
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
P298
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 21
Less Tnan
Signiacam Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Pplenrauy
SIGN!,canl wnn
Mitigaupn Tnan
SlgniLCam
No
Impacl Incompratetl Impac; Impact
Comments:
a) The proposed project will not result in a significant increase of traffic in the area. As noted in the
General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the
Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the
FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated.
b) Although, additional trips may be generated in order to maintain the billboards, these trips are not
anticipated to be significant. The removal of nine billboards citywide would result in a cumulative
decrease of trips needed for maintenance. No impacts are anticipated.
c) The proposed project will not change air traffic patterns. Also, the applicant will be required to
comply with the Federal Aviation Administration requirementslregulations; therefore; no impacts are
anticipated.
d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project design does not include any sharp
curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will; therefore, not create a
substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. To ensure that there are minimal
impacts, the following mitigation measures have been included as pert of the project:
1) There shall be no film clips and/or animation shown on the digital displays.
2) No display may change its message in less than four seconds. There shall be no
flashing, blinking, or scrolling of images on the displays.
3) The billboards shall not produce any noise/sound.
e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not
create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated.
f) The Billboard Relocation and Reconstruction Project will not create an inadequate parking capacity.
No impacts are anticipated.
g) The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting
alternative transportation.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
()
()
()
(/)
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/)
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/)
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
P299
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 22
Less Tnan
Significenl Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
PP g Pe;annaoy
5gni.icant wnn
Mitigation Tnan
Significant
No
Impact Incomoratetl Impact Irryact
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/)
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/)
provider, which serves or may serve the project, that
has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/)
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and O O O (/)
regulations related to solid waste?
Comments:
a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland
Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The
project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control
Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated.
b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland
Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1
located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet
the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater.
No impacts are anticipated.
c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the
flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer
prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant.
d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply
available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated.
e) The proposed project sites are served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the
Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and
RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated.
f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse
at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs.
g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent
with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.
P300
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 23
Less Than
Slpnihcan; Less
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources:
pp g Ppfepoauv
Slpnillcant wnn
Mitigation Tnan
Sipnilicant
No
Impact nCOrD0t8t0d fllpact mp0t1
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (~)
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (~)
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (~)
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
a) The project sites are not located in areas of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City
of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding the sites is
developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any
endangered or rare species would inhabit the project sites. In addition, the activities of proposed
project (i.e. removal and reconstruction of existing billboards) will not affect biological resources.
b) The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of
Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of
build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General
Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality,
the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation
measures were adopted for each of these resources. However, given the proposed project
activities are not considered significant in the context of the aforementioned environmental factors,
it would not contribute to cumulative impacts.
c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies
construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact.
Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once
construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts
associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels during construction. Mitigation
measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels.
P301
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 24
EARLIER ANALYSES/TECHNICAL STUDIES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one
or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section
15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately
analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects
were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses
were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive:
(T) General Plan FEIR
(SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001)
P302
Initial Study for
DRC2008-00111 -Lamar Advertising
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 25
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have
read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or
proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the
effects to a point where clearly no significant environmer~l-effects would occur.
Applicant's Signature:
Print Name and Title:
lcPj
Rev, 5/24/06
P303
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Environmental Assessment DRC2008-00111
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the
conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and
to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will
be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the
project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency
Redevelopment Agency
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
P304
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
DRC2008-00111 - LAMAR ADVERTISING
April 16, 2008
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as
determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation
activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe project planner or responsible City department
and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten
notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the
authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached
hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authorityto
hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall
require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City.
These funds shall be used by the City.to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to
monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether
the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall
conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or
Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: DRC 2008-00111 Applicant: Lemar Advertisina Company
Initial Study Prepared by: Rina Leuna Date: March 18, 2007
~ .
` ~ ~ U `;. i "~ r 3 4°~"$d r ~ ~` 4+sy;~. ~
,
~'1
~
u
sit`
4
d~
f
Fd
'
thdt
t `
Ae
auy +7 ..*
~ ~+r
r ~
~ .
s `~ ~ ;~
W
_~
~
~+~'
~~yy~a' v
t~i
~ ~^ ~t
,,+~ ,. a
~r .
~ t+ ha k
~h~
r NL - r .
~
r
,
,
~~ ~ ~
,
~
,
ry
.
ics
,
s
~ x
. ... . .. ... ..... ~.. .._ ........ n- nt . ~ ......tl .._a at.u x
;
!;..... _a:2K .~.. o
.~
,
,
.. ,..... R M s 7
. LSlah, w... ..... .. ~
~
2 L A,. ~. j
_._: .. ..
t_ _ .
To ensure that there would be no impacts to light and PD B/C Review of Plans C/D 3
glare, a mitigation measure has been imposed to require
that all associated equipment/cabinets be screened by
mature landscaping and set back from the public
riyhts-of-way.
In order to ensure that there would be no impacts to light PD e/C Review of Plans C/D 3
and glare, a mitigation measure has been imposed to
require a dimming feature, which automatically adjusts
between night and day views, to be installed for all digital
displays.
~ "~RBi+f x°1i5'rIk'rT~br°~"~ ~~rz a'.f`;~rni{v"''a ''~~l~
~`~~r'~r~ll
" p'PJ~~~f'y'f 'gyp
~
) ,,,~~41 ~~6~'1[,~~fitu6 `~ ,'~.k{,.: '~
Ai? Qualit _,~ ~ 1'~~' ~~r~"~,^,~ I .hws..~"r> .n,=. Y
~~
~ A_.r ~~ C
y '~.a";:T~
All construction equipment shall be maintained in good PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4
operating condition so as to reduce operational
emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment is being properly serviced and
maintained as per manufacturers' specifications.
Maintenance records shall be available at the
construction site for City verification.
The developer shall submit construction plans to the City PD/BO C Review of plans C 2
denoting the proposed schedule and projected
equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide
evidence that low-emission mobile construction
equipment will be utilized, or that their use was
investigated and found to be infeasible for the project.
Contractors shall also conform to any construction
measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City
Planning staff.
1 of 7 w
0
cn
-. ..
All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4
performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113.
Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or
high volume, low-pressure spray.
All asphalt materials shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of plans A/C 2
standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108.
All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4
Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall
include the following provisions:
Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4
through seeding and watering.
Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4
Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4
areas to erosion over extended periods of time.
Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4
exposed excavated soil during and after the end of
work periods.
Dispose of surplus excavated materials in BO C Review of plans A 4
accordance with state and local ordinances and use
sound engineering practices.
Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4
by the City ii silt is carried over to adjacent public construction
thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling.
Timing may vary depending upon time of year of
construction.
Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4
wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction
Rule 403 requirements.
Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4
haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other construction
suitable means.
2of7 w
0
rn
_ .
The site shall be' treated with water or other BO C During A 4
soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction
Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily
to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in
accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4
RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction
areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to
reduce PM,o emissions.
The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4
alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible.
The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4
construction plans include a statement that work crews
will shut off equipment when not in use.
~~ 4,,, ~ ~ , ~ .,:i , ~~ ~..
;r
, a ~,~ ,5 r~s ~F' t"6 a~ ~ {,; ~ ,~,,. ,
Cultural Resources h
~
If any prehistoric archaeological resources are
encountered before or during grading or earth moving
activities, the developer will retain a qualified
archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to
take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them
for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the
City of Rancho Cucamonga will:
Enact interim measures to protect undesignated PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4
sites from demolition or significant modification
without an opportunity for the City to establish its
archaeological value.
• Consider establishing provisions to require PDlBO C Review of report A/D 3/4
incorporation of archaeological sites within new
developments, using their special qualities as a
theme or focal point.
• Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4
archaeological heritage of the area.
3of7 ~,
0
V
- .
Propose mitigation measures and recommend
PD/BO
C
Review of report
A/D .
3/4
conditions of approval to minimize project effects on
significant, important, and unique prehistoric
resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines.
Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C Review of report A/D 3/4
documenting the inventory, evaluation, and
proposed mitigation of resources within the project
area. Submit one copy of the completed report with
original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County
Archaeological Information Center for permanent
archiving.
It any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal PD B Review of report A/D 4
fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the
developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor
construction activities and to take appropriate measures
to protect or preserve them for study. The
paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will
also provide specific recommendations regarding further
mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)
that maybe appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is
appropriate, the program must include, but not be
limited to, the following measures:
Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of report A/D 4
equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with
minimal construction delay, to the site full-time
during the interval of earth-disturbing activities.
Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report '°`/D 4
or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities
elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage.
If construction personnel makes the discovery, the
grading contractor should immediately divert
construction and notify the monitor of the find.
Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils far PD D Review of report D 3
documentation in the summary report and transfer to
an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino
County Museum).
4 of 7 w
0
.. -.
..
Submit a summary report to the Cily of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3
Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a
copy of the report to San Bernardino County
Museum.
r'=' L'- c 7 .~ "x.e a.5 ?r'r° - w, ' ~' ~77,i$w
Geolott and~Sod§~-~+~~' s~S.~~ ~k~~~~:w ., Jw ~,s
}
#
~
' w~
=„ E ,. ~ x}', ~y ma y
~~t ~
~
~
~
~ ; 5v+,
` '~k~ t
~
5
~
~
+ x
k't~ ~x~
~
~ ro. ~
r
.~1H.xva
q-.-n ~_: /J`]I~t... ~.~'V `3.:'2•.
1',4..Y~. :3li~LhS'
:::.-`a.. .•Ly
v'+~ V~.-i.. ilK.r ~
t;
-.IY.U
t__.1._ ~..'i~..
1.5
t-;
Y
~. ~.t ~.
t ._:i,w
.~..w.+'iz.~
a
The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4
soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction
RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance
with SCAOMD Rule 403.
Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4
schedule established by the City to reduce PM,p construction
emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil
off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year
of construction.
Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4
speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction
from the site during such episodes.
Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and BO C During A 4
RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction
areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to
reduce PM,a emissions.
l~~
~ 1l1 Y Ov 'f F S }e4
te~Matenals ~"
H
rd
nd W
] 1 t St:f ~T ' ~
,, ~ W 6
r T~. E
p'I YII~"uv f
~ TtRt~~(y~il~ ' {I ::'
.t
,.
aza
s a
as
., ~ ~
.
In order to mitigate for any potential impacts, the PD B Prior to B 2
proposed Billboard Relocation and Reconstruction construction
Project will be required as a mitigation measure to
comply with any applicable Federal Aviation
Administration policies/regulations.
.. ~. Ca : Y.: i ~ ~1a( '~~ ~' `-^fY /!< ~3 r ti
s
and
Water Quality ~
H drolo
g
'~
~
'
~
~7~
a
'~ ~ 'S fr '~ tG
~~; ~~~`~
'
+°~ -{ rv ~ m
t~.
~
~~
C
tt'
~ 9 ~ n
~
i
~~ ,fl"t Jy -0 x.e"'C~i
~ ' N a.~~ -
~ ~ ~~ "
yk~
G
dµr.~
(
`.
,:
t,
~
n~
^
t,
y
, ,
a
`,t. ~rrt n?
r
G
a~
<~ . ~~,.a ~
c
~. „ .
_
During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4
sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent
discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there
is rainfall or other runoff.
5 of 7 W
0
- - - ..
.. -
During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4
cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and
after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to
prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site.
R#, (t 4 ~
NOISe r', nti ~ *T ~ x+ i it ; )I ~ E ~I I^{,'~'~rt ~,'~~3~ ~c-yv
.~~ _.~ S, _6. ~~ ~. Fat
~... ,_..... ._. ..r ~.,. ~w .... .. .. t ~ "~Qf~,~`', ~9,~ky~ i,
.Y I q ~~
s 3.w.~.,
,. ..~ ..,,,,..
't~~ ~9f i
I,yol 40 ~4'll ~~ `~.~v~
F ti~L.. ~F:~a.4~?
I~ "irA~c ~`,f•1'i`~~'
lit~1~' d I tk
~admft%e~ .k..
., _ ~.. ... ... ~ & ~ ~fl9t x
~f to l" a 1
d
.. u_.. ..,, ~. , -
~ i
Construction or grading shall no[ take place between the BO C During A 4
hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction
including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a
national holiday.
Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4
standards specified in Development Code Section construction
17.02.120-D, as measured at the properly line. The
developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly
noise level monitoring as specified in Development
Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may
be required by the Building Official. Said consultant
shall report their findings to the Building Official within
24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above
standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify
the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above
standards, then construction activities shall be reduced
in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise
standards or halted.
Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7
hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction
including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a
national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for
hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to
and from the construction site), then the developer shall
prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any
construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible,
the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass
sensitive land uses or residential dwellings.
6of7 W
0
- .
r.'= ~' r1v t '
~~~
~Trans
ortatlonlfrafflc` ':
, ,jai ~' A;'3`: .
~`~ t, „"~r'~'w
~
r~
`a~'~2.? ~ k~s;_,
~
'`
3 , _, ,
^
`
~ .
.y n?rn
}
.
p
f ~ E„_.~ a ~~~ + ,~,, a {
„ ¢ {~. ~ ,.
.
` t.
To ensure that there are minimal impacts, the following
mitigation measures have been included as part of the
project:
There shall be no film clips and/or animation shown PD B/E Throughout A/C 2,7
on the digital displays.
No display may change its message in less than four PD B/E Throughout A/C 2,7
seconds. There shall be no flashing, blinking, or
scrolling of images on the displays.
The billboards shall not produce any noise/sound. PD B/E Throughout A/C 2,7
Key to Checklist Abbreviations
"Responsible Person ;>'' ~'~, - ' Mondonng Frequeric '
y _"Method of ~Verrflcation' c >* Sarictions" -
CDD -Community Development Director or designee A ~-With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map
PD -Planning Director or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy
BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order
PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP
7 -Citation
7of7 w
STAFF REPORT -
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
RANCHO
Date: April 16, 2008 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Fabian A. Villenas, Principal Management Analyst
Subject: Consideration of extending the Mobile Home Accords for a period of seven years
with the following mobile home parks located in Rancho Cucamonga: Alta
Laguna, Alta Vista, Casa Volante, Chaparral Heights, Foothill Mobile Manor, The
Pines, Ramona Villa, and Sycamore Villa
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve aseven-year extension of the Mobile Home
Accords with all eight of the mobile home parks located in Rancho Cucamonga. The terms of the
Accord remain the same.
BACKGROUND
The Mobile Home Accords are agreements between the City and the owners of the eight mobile
home parks in the City that address space rent increases. The Accords were put into place almost
20 years ago as a way to provide stability in mobile home park rents while still respecting the rights
of the park owners and their right to a "fair return" . The last extension was executed in February
2002 for seven years. The current Accords will expire at 11:59 p.m. on February 5, 2009.
The Mobile Home Accords allow for mobile home park owners to raise space rents a certain
percentage each year based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), with a minimum increase of 3%
and a maximum increase of 9%. That means if the CPI is below 3%, the owner can still raise rates
by 3%; and should the CPI rise above 9%, the owners can only charge the 9% maximum and not
raise rates any higher.
In compliance with the Accords, each year the City of Rancho Cucamonga calculates the CPI
based on an average of the previous 12-month released indexes. For example, the CPI for 2007
was established by taking the sum of the CPIs for each month from December 2005 to November
2006, and dividing it by twelve. The data is obtained from the U.S. Department of Labor for the
Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI-U) as published for the Los Angeles-Orange
County-Riverside area. City staff verifies and approves all proposed rent increases for each park.
The Accords also contain a voluntary vacancy control provision that limits how much an increase
can be applied after a mobile home space is vacated. This provision limits increases to 15%, once
every three years, upon transfer of ownership, such as the sale of the home, unless transferred to
an immediate family member (legal spouse, parents, or children). The Accords also address other
adjustments such as for governmental tax changes, utilities, and capital projects.
P312
P313
CONSIUERA'TION OF EXTENDING'THE MOBILE HOME ACCORDS FOR A PL"RIOD OF SEVEN YEARS PAGE 2
WITH'1'HE FOI,I,OWING MOBILE HOME PARKS LOCA'T'ED IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA: ALTA LAGUNA,
ALTA V IS'CA, CASA VOLANTE, CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS, FOOTHILL MOBILE MANOR, THE PINES,
RAMONA VILLA, AND
APRIL 16, ?008
The Accords only regulate space rent increases and do not have the authority to address other
issues such as landlord-tenant issues, park rules and regulations, long-term leases, and most
maintenance issues. The California Mobile Home Residency Law regulates these issues and
enforcement is achieved through private litigation.
ACCORD RENEWAL PROCESS
Under the direction of the Mobile Home Accord Renewal Ad Hoc Committee, composed of Council
Members Rex Gutierrez and Sam Spagnolo, the renewal process began in March 2007. Over the
past year, Staff met with representatives of the park owners and residents in negotiating this
extension. Throughout the process, the Ad Hoc Committee met on a regular basis to receive
updates and provide staff direction. In the end, the park owners for all eight mobile home parks
agreed to extend the Accords with the same terms for a period of seven years. This was presented
to the park residents on March 20, 2008 and they agreed to the extension. At its March 26, 2008
meeting, the Ad Hoc Committee also concurred and recommended that the Accords be forwarded
for City Council approval.
CONCLUSION
The Mobile Home Accord Renewal Ad Hoc Committee has reviewed this matter and recommends
that the City Council approve aseven-year extension of the mobile home accord with Alta Laguna,
Alta Vista, Casa Volante, Chaparral Heights, Foothill Mobile Manor, The Pines, Ramona Villa, and
Sycamore Villa mobile home parks. The terms of the Accord will be identical and the Appendix
listing the facilities and services offered in each park has been updated to reflect current conditions
in the parks.
Attachments:
(1) Amendment No. 3 to Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and Owners of Certain Mobilehome Parks Within Rancho Cucamonga
Providing for an Annual Maximum Rent Adjustment
(2) Amendment No. 1 to Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and Owners of Ramona Villa Mobile Home Park Providing for an Annual
Maximum Rent Adjustment;
(3) Amendment No. 1 to Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and Owners of Sycamore Villa Mobile Home Park Providing for an Annual
Maximum Rent Adjustment;
P314
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO "AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND OWNERS OF CERTAIN MOBILE HOME
PARKS WITHIN RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROVIDING FOR AN ANNUAL
MAXIMUM RENT ADJUSTMENT."
This Amendment No. 3 (hereinafter "Amendment No. 3") is made and entered into this
_ day of April, 2008, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the owners of six mobile home parks in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia (hereinafter collectively "Owners"), and is an
amendment to that certain Agreement entered into on February 6, 1992, between the City and
Owners; and Amendment No. 2, dated January 16, 2002 between City and each of the Owners
("Amendment No. 2").
Section A. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
"4. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be deemed to have
commenced on February 6, 1992 and shall end at 11:59 p.m. on
February 5, 2016."
Section B. Appendix "A" attached to this Amendment No. 3 shall supersede
Appendix "A" attached to the Agreement, and Appendix "A" attached to Amendment No. 2.
Section C. Amendment No. 2 is further superseded in its entirety. To the extent that
any other amendment to said Agreement exists between any of the Owners herein, this
Amendment No. 3 hereby supersedes any such other amendment.
Section D. Except as herein amended, the terms and conditions of the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have entered into this Amendment No. 3 as of
April _, 2008.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
A municipal corporation
By:
Donald J. Kurth, Mayor
Attest:
By:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
1046203-2
P315
AMENDMENT NO. 3
page 2
Approved as to Form:
By:
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Owner:
By:
Alta Laguna Mobile Home Estates
By:
Alta Vista Mobile Home Park
By:
Casa Volante Mobile Home Park
By:
Chaparral Heights Mobile Home Park
By:
Foothill Mobile Manor
By: The Pines Mobile Home Park
By:
By:
Russell C. Jay Family Trust
dated October 22, 1987
General Partner
The Ben Rochelle Revocable Trust
dated August 9, 1998
Genera] Partner
By:
Ben Rochelle
1046203-2 2
P316
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO "AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND OWNERS OF RAMONA VILLA MOBILE
HOME PARK PROVIDING FOR AN ANNUAL MAXIMUM RENT
ADJUSTMENT."
This Amendment No. 1 (hereinafter "Amendment No. 1") is made and entered into this
day of April, 2008, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the owners of Ramona Villa Mobile Home
Park (hereinafter "Owners"), and is an amendment to that certain Agreement effective July 1,
2002 ("Agreement").
Section A. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
"4. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be deemed to have
commenced on February 6, 1992 and shall end at 11:59 p.m. on
February 5, 2016."
B. Appendix "A" attached to this Amendment No. 1 shall supersede
Appendix "A" attached to the Agreement.
Section B. Except as herein amended, the terms and conditions of the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have entered into this Amendment No. 1 as of
April _, 2008.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
A municipal corporation
By: _
Attest:
By: _
Donald J. Kurth, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
By:
Owner:
By:
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Ramona Villa Mobile Home Park
1046344-1
P317
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO "AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND OWNERS OF SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE
HOME PARK WITHIN RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROVIDING FOR AN
ANNUAL MAXIMUM RENT ADJUSTMENT."
This Amendment No. 1 (hereinafter "Amendment No. 1") is made and entered into this
day of April, 2008, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the owners of Sycamore Villa Mobile home
Park (hereinafter collectively "Owners"), and is an amendment to that certain Agreement dated
February 6, 2002, between the City and Owners ("Agreement").
Section A. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended entirety to read as follows:
"4. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be deemed to have
commenced on February 6, 1992 and shall end at 11:59 p.m. on
Februazy 5, 2016."
Section B. Appendix "A" attached to this Amendment No. 1 shall supersede
Appendix "A" attached to the Agreement.
Section C. Except as herein amended, the terms and conditions of the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have entered into this Amendment No. 1 as of
April _, 2008.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
A municipal corporation
By:
Donald J. Kurth, Mayor
Attest:
By:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
By:
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Owner
By:
Sycamore Villa Mobile Home Park
1046206-1
MEMORANDUM ~ ~ _ ~ ~
r r
Ci n AL~~ ~Gax'~ OFFICE
RANCHO
Date Apnl 16, 2008 CUCAMONGA
To Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From Fabian A Villenas, Principal Management Analyst
Subtect Amended Agenda Item No J2 Consideration of Renewal of Mobile Home Accords
for Penod of Seven Years with the Following Mobile Home Parks Located m
Rancho Cucamonga Alta Laguna, Alta Vista, Casa Volante, Chaparral Heights,
Foothill Mobile Manor, The Pines, Sycamore Villa, and Ramona Villa
The attached amendments to Agenda item No J2 (Consideration of Renewal of Mobile Home
Accords for Period of Seven Years with the Following Mobile Home Parks Located in Rancho
Cucamonga Alta Laguna, Alta Vista, Casa Volante, Chaparral Heights, Foothill Mobile Manor, The
Pines, Sycamore Villa, and Ramona Villa) replaces pages P314 - P317 in your Agenda Packet for
the April 16, 2008 City Council meeting Appendix "A" was inadvertently omitted from the Agenda
Packet and language addressing a previous adjustment for Sycamore Villa was added to this park's
amendment (Section B) No other substantive changes were made
cc City Attorney's Office
AMENDMENT NO 3 TO "AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND OWNERS OF CERTAIN MOBILE HOME
PARKS WITHIN RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROVIDING FOR AN ANNl_lAL
MAXIMUM RENT ADJUSTMENT "
This Amendment No 3 (heremafter "Amendment No 3") ~s made and entered into this
16°i day of Apnl, 2008, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cahfornia, a mumc~pal
corporation (heremafter referred to as "Crty"), and the owners of six mobile home parks m the
Cny of Rancho Cucamonga, Cahforma (heremafter collectively "Owners"), and ~s an
amendment to that certain Agreement entered into on February 6, 1992, between the City and
Owners, and Amendment No 2, dated January 16, 2002 between Crty and each of the Owners
("Amendment No 2")
Section A Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows
"4 Term The term of this Agreement shall be deemed to have
commenced on February 6, 1992 and shall end at 11 59 p m on
February 5, 2016 "
Section B Appendix "A" attached to this Amendment No 3 shall supersede
Appendix "A" attached to the Agreement, and Appendix "A" attached to Amendment No 2
Section C Amendment No 2 ~s further superseded m its entirety To the extent that
any other amendment to said Agreement exists between any of the Owners herein, this
Amendment No 3 hereby supersedes any such other amendment
Section D Except as herein amended, the ternis and conditions of the Agreement
shall remain m full force and effect
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have entered into this Amendment No 3 as of
April 16, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
A municipal corporation
By
Donald J Kurth, Mayor
Attest
By
Debra J Adams, City Clerk
IOd6203-2
AMENDMENT NO 3
Page
Approved as to Fonn
By
James L Markman, Crty Attorney
Owner
By
Alta Laguna Mobile Home Estates
By
Alta Vtsta Mobile Home Park
By
Casa Volante Mobile Home Park
By
Chaparral Heights Mobile Home Park
By
Foothill Mobile Manor
By The Pmes Mobile Home Park
By
Russell C Jay Family Trust
dated October 22, 1987
General Partner
By
The Ben Rochelle Revocable Trust
dated August 9, 1998
General Partner
By
Ben Rochelle
ioa~zo3-z 2
APPENDIX "A"
J - List of Facilities and Services Available at Rancho Cucamonga Communities as of April 2008
Alta Alta Casa Chapparal Foothill Ramona Sycamore The
Facilities and Services at Community Laguna Vista Volante Heights Manor Villa Villa Pines
Clubhouse
_
ONice -/ /-- / ~ ~ / / -
Kitchen / s / / ~ /
Billiards Room / / / / / / ~ --~
Library / / - ~ / - ~
General Meeting Room / ~ / / / / /
Card Room
- / / / / r / ~ - -
Restrooms
/
/
~
/
~
s
~ __
Laundry Room (controlled by vendors)' / / / / / ~
Shuffleboard Court(s) / / / -
Heated Swimming Pool
- _ _
/
/
-
/ ___
/ _
/
Heated all year ~ / - - - - _ -
Heated during these months
- - - - - NIA APR-SEPT
-- -NIA
- - JUNE-SEPT NOT HEATED
-- - - --
-- - MDAY-L DA
Y APR-SEP JUNE
-A
UG
Pool Furniture
/
/
/
/ -
/ _
-
/
~ _
_
/'
-
Heated Spa / / / / / /
Wading Pool /
Sauna - - - - -- -- - -
/ -
-
Paved Streets / / / / / / / /
Street Lights / /
-_ / / / /
Guest Parking Areas
- - / / - / -- / / ~ _ ~ _ /
Exterior Fencing / / / ~ ~ / / /
Gas Utilities
_ -- - _
_ /
_ _ /
- / / s /
Electric Utilities / ~
/ /* * / / / /
Water Service / / / s - / s / - / -
Sewer Service / / / / /
Trash Disposal Services
- - -- -_-. /
-
--- /
- _-- /
- / / ~ - ~ - / -/
BBQ and/or Picnic Faalities ,i -- - ~ __ _- . _ / / .___
Master Antenna TV Service - -
/ -----
ommon Area Maintenance / /
- - / / / / / - -
Street Sweeping / / / /
RV Parking (monthly charge) / _ / / T ~ / /
Mailboxes
- _ _ /
- - /
- --
- ° - / / / / / /
Homesile Numbers Curbside
/
/ -- - -
/
/
/ ~
. /
/
Car Wash Facilities / - - - -- ----
Controlled Access Gates / --- ---- --- -- -
_ _ -
Tennis Courts
/
___
__ _..,.- -
_ ---- ---
- ---,.._
Basketball Court _- .___ /_
-- __ ___--- _------.--. _,
Bocce Court
--- - --_ - - --- --~ -_ ___---- - ----- - -_---- _------
Exercise Room _ .
- -- - /
__ - - - ~ - -- ~ _ - _ _ - - - --- - -- -
/
Game Room _ - _... __ - - ~ ._ _ _
Community Directory / / / / - - - - - ~ -- ~ _
'The amenities in these facilities are controlled by third party vendors.
They can only be provided if these third party vendors continue to provide the service or amenity in question
on a commercially and reasonably feasible basis
The Community owners are not responsible for price changes affecting utility services, laundry machines,
vending machines or services provided to residents by third party vendors.
'" Park owner provides electricity service to common areas & common facilities
The Community owners agree to maintain and provide the contents of the facilities listed above,
subject to reasonable wear and tear by residents and their guests, in approximately the same number of such contents
as currently exists within the Community in question (e.g , it the billiards room has two pool tables, then the
Community will continue to provide two pool tables). However, this commitment is subject to reasonable modifications
in the future resulting from the changing preferences of the residents, changes in the Community demographics,
changes in Industry standards and trends or changes in the law or the legal, regulatory or insurance environment.
The Community owners agree that they will notify their respective Residents' Committee in advance, and meet with that
Committee at the Committee's request, in the event that the Community owners intend to make any significant changes to the
above list of Facilities and Services at each owner's respective Community.
Adopted by City Council April 16. 2008
AMENDMENT NO 1 TO "AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND OWNERS OF RAMONA VILLA MOBILE
HOME PARK PROVIDING FOR AN ANTIUAL MAa1MUM RENT
ADIUSTMENT "
This Amendment No 1 (hereinafter "Amendment No 1") is made and entered into this
16°i day of April, 2008, by and behveen the C,ty of Rancho Cucamonga, Cahfonna, a mumc~pal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the owners of Ramona Villa Mobile Home
Park (hereinafter "Owners"), and ~s an amendment to that certain Agreement effective July 1,
2002 ("Agreement")
Section A Sectwn 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows
"4 Tenn The term of this Agreement shall be deemed to have
commenced on February 6, 1992 and shall end at 1 1 59 p m on
February 5, 2016 "
B Appendix "A" attached to this Amendment No 1 shall supersede
Appendix "A" attached to the Agreement
SecUOn B Except as herein amended, the ternis and conditions of the Agreement
shall remain m full force and effect
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have entered into this Amendment No 1 as of
Apnl 16, 2008
City of Rancho Cucamonga
A municipal corporation
By _
Attest
By _
Donald J Kurth, Mayor
Debra J Adams, City Clerk
Approved as to Forni
By
Owner
By
James L Markman, City Attorney
Ramona Villa Mobile Home Park
1046344-1
APPENDIX "A"
List of Facilities and Services Available at Rancho Cucamonga Communities as of April 2008
Alta Alta Casa Chapparal Foothill Ramona Sycamore The
Facilities and Services at Community Laguna Vista Volante Heights Manor Villa Villa Pines
Clubhouse
Office / / / / / / / /
Kitchen / / / / / / / /
Billiards Room / / / / / / ~ / - ~ /
Library /
/
/
/ ------ ----
/
General Meeting Room / ^-^ / / T ___
T / / / / /
Restrooms / / / / / / / /
Laundry Room (controlled bYvendors1' / / / / / / /
_
Shuffleboard Courts / / / --'
Heated Swimming Pool / -
/ / ~
/ / / /.Y_ __.. /
Heated all year.
/
/ -- -
-- ---- - -
--_ .___.-----
_ -/ ---
Heated duringthese months N/A APR-SEPT N/A JUNE-SEPT NOT HEA_T_E_D _M_DAV-L
D
AV APR-SEP U
NE-AUG
J
Pool Furniture
- -- - / / / / / __
_
_
/ / _
_
~ /
Heated Spa
... - - - ~
_ /
_ / / / _ -- ~ - - -_ _~ - __~_
Wadino Pool ~ . _. _. __ _--- _.
Paved Streets / / / / ~ ~ / ~ ~ / / /
Street Lights / / / / /~~~ ~~~~ ~~ / /
-
Guest Parking Areas / / / / / / _ ~~ / /
Exterior Fencing / / / / / / / /
Gas Utilities / / / / / / ~ ~~~~ ~~/
Electric Utilities
/
/
/# #
/
/ - -_
/ --
/
Water Service / / / / / " / - / - /- - --
RV
'The amenities in these facilities are controlled by third party vendors.
They can only be provided if these third party vendors continue to provide the service or amenity in question
on a commercially and reasonably feasible basis
The Community owners are not responsible for price changes affecting utility services, laundry machines,
vending machines or services provided to residents by third party vendors.
'" Park owner provides electricity service to common areas R common facilities
The Community owners agree to maintain and provide the contents of the facilities listed above,
subject to reasonable wear and tear by residents and their guests, in approximately the same number of such contents
as currently exists within the Community in question (e.g., if the billiards room has two pool tables, then the
Community will continue to provide two pool tables). However, this commitment is subject to reasonable modifications
in the future resulting from the changing preferences of the residents, changes in the Community demographics,
changes in Industry standards and trends or changes in the law or the legal, regulatory or insurance environment.
The Community owners agree that they will notify their respective Residents' Committee in advance, and meet with that
Committee at the Committee's request, in the event that the Community owners intend to make any significant changes to the
above list of Facilities and Services at each owner's respective Community.
Adopted by City Council April i6, 2008
AMENDMENT NO 1 TO "AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITl' OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND OWNERS OF SYCAMORE V1LLA MOBILE
HOME PARK WITHIN RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROVIDING FOR AN
ANNUAL MAXIMUM RENT ADJUSTMENT "
Thts Amendment No 1 (hereinaftet "Amendment No 1") is made and entered nuo this
day of Aprtl, 2008, by and between the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, Cahfornta, a mumetpal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Gty"), and the owners of Sycamore Villa Mobtle Home
Park (hereinafter collectively "Owners"), and is an amendment to that certain Agreement dated
February 6, 2002, between the Crty and Owners ("Agreement")
SecUOn A Sectton 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended entirety to read as follows
"4 Temt The term of this Agreement shall be deemed to have
commenced on February 6, 1992 and shall end at 1 1 59 p m on February
5, 2016 "
Section B Sectton 9(E)(3) of the Agreement is amended m its enttrety to read as
follows
"(3) Effective February 6, 2009, the Base Rent for each space subJect to
the Accord shall include the cumulative $28 00 increase collected during
the term extending from February 6, 2002 through February 6, 2009, and
may be included m the calculation of future rent increases imposed after
February 6, 2009 Provided that, nothing herein shall authorize the
Owners to increase the rents by the sum of $28 00 on or afer February 6,
2009 "
Secuon C Appendtx "A" attached to this Amendment No I shall supersede
Appendtx "A" attached to the Agreement
Secuon D Crty and Owners acknowledge that effective June 13, 2002, the Owners
and resident representatives of Sycamore Villa Mobtle Home Park entered into an Addendum tc
this Agreement Owners agree that rt is intended that this Amendment No 1 shall supersede
Sections (1) and (2) of the Addendum, and that Owners shall interpret and apply the Addendum
consistent with this Amendment No 1
Secuon E Except as herein amended, the terms and conditions of the Agreement
shall remain m full force and effect
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have entered into this Amendment No ] as of
April _, 2008
Crty of Rancho Cucamonga
A mm~icipal corporation
toa~zoo-z
Crty of Rancho Cucamonga/Sycamore Villa
Amendment No 1
page 2
By _
Attest
By _
Donald J Kurth, Mayor
Debra J Adams, Crty Clerk
Approved as to Form
By _
Owner
By _
James L Markman, City Attorney
Sycamore Villa Mobile Home Park
ioaG2o~-?
APPENDIX "A"
List of Facilities and Services Available at Rancho Cucamonga Communities as of April 2008 i
Alta Alta Casa Chapparal Foothill Ramona Sycamore The
Facilities and Services at Community Laguna Vista Volante Heights Manor Villa Villa Pines
Clubhouse
Office -/ ~ ~ / / / / - - _ J
Kitchen / / / / / / /
Billiards Room
-- / s r / / v
Library / / ~ ~ - -~ --
General Meeting Room / / / / /
Card Room / / / / /
Restrooms / / / s -/ / /
Laundry Room (controlled by vendors)' / / / / s
Shuffleboard Court(s)
- - - - ~ /
Heated Swimming Pool
- -
~
.._ _
/
r
/
/
/ _
/ - __
/
Heated all year ;; / -- _ -- -
Heated during these months
-
NIA
- ---
APR-SEPT
-- -
N/A
JUNE-SEPT NOT HEATED
- -
M DAV-L DAY
APR-SEP - - -
JUNE-RUG
pool Furniture / / / / s ~
/ --- - -
/
-seated Spa / / / / ~ ~ -
JVading Pool /
Sauna - - -
/ - __ -
'aved Streets / / r / / / /
3treel Lights
- /
_ - /
- - / / r /
3uest Parking Areas
/
- -
/
- _
/
-
/
/
r
~ ___
/
xterior Fencing /
_ ..... / / ~ e / / s
3as Utilities
/
/ _
/
/
~
/
lectric Utilities
- -
- -- /
- / / * # - / - - -
-
/
- - -
/
Nater Service / / / - / / / / /
sewer Service
/
/
~ _
/ -- -
/ _ - .
/
/
rash Disposal Services
/
/ -
- --- - - -- -
- / - -
-
- - -
--/
- s ~
-- - -
/
- -
/
3BQ and/or Picnic Facilities
/ - -
-- -
/
- -
/
"" '-
Raster Antenna TV Service /
;ommon Area Maintenance /_ /
- / - / / / /
>treet Sweeping /
-_ /
-
-
-
---- ---
-----
_
-
~ -
tV Parking (monthly charge) / / / /
Mailboxes / / / _ / / /
lomesite Numbers Curbside / / / / _
/
/
/ - -
;ar Wash Facilities
- - - _ - _.
/ -
/
-
/
-
/
_. -
--
;ontrolled Access Gates / ~ - -~- - -"-- - -- ~ -
ennis Courts ~ - - - - ----- -- - .. --- - -
~asketball Court
- -- -
- /
_ - -
/
___ __ __
occe Court
xercise Room / ~ ~ / / - -
lame oom
-- -- - - - -- -
~ -
- -- -
ommunity Directory
/
/
/ _
/ --
--
- /
/
'The amenities in these facilities are controlled by third party vendors.
They can only be provided if these third party vendors continue to provide the service or amenity in question
on a commercially and reasonably feasible basis
The Community owners are not responsible for price changes affecting utility services, laundry machines,
vending machines or services provided to residents by third party vendors
" Park owner provides electricity service to common areas & common facilities
The Community owners agree to maintain and provide the contents of the facilities listed above,
subject to reasonable wear and tear by residents and their guests, in approximately the same number of such contents
as currently exists within the Community in question (e.g , if the billiards room has two pool tables, then the
Community will continue to provide two pool tables). However, this commitment is subject to reasonable modifications
in the future resulting from the changing preferences of the residents, changes in the Community demographics,
changes in Industry standards and trends or changes in the law or the legal, regulatory or insurance environment
The Community owners agree that they will notify their respective Residents' Committee in advance, and meet with that
Committee at the Committee's request, in the event that the Community owners intend to make any significant changes to the
above list of Facilities and Services at each owner's respective Community
Adopted by City Council April 16. 2008
L
0
V
V
Q
O
2
N
O
ca
L
0
L
a
00
0
0
N
Cfl
._
a
c~•
L
V
V
Q
d
E
0
x
a~
0
Q
t
a
U
-~
C6
L
L
Q
~ ~
N ~
~ U
~~
~~
~~
~ U
~ Q
~~
C6 ~
~--~
~ (~
o~
> ~
•
a~
U
0
L
.~
N
~~-+
U
0
^i..
I..L
•
c~
0
.~
L
C~
Q
~--+
~ ~
-+= ~
.~
~ ~
o~
~>
U ~_
~ ~~
-~
Q~
~ ~
~ O
L
U .~
~ ~
~ L
W y~_.
•
L
O
N
0
4-
U
U
2
L
0
~+-
N
O
O
N
L.L
•--~ ~
~ c~
•
-+~
Q
~U
L
O
O
~--~
.~
•
^~
-~
m
c
c
0
U
L
U
Q.
U
0
^0,
W
^~
L
U
C6
O
~-
X
N
U_
~L
L
L (~
~ ~
~ ~
U
O ~
•-
a~ ~
~ ~
~> _
o c~
Q ~
~L
I..L >
U ~
~~
~~
~~
~~
_U
Ca ~
U ~
-~_ (CS
U ~
• •
.X
C6
0
.~
.~
M
M
y--
O
.~
.~
C6
a~
U
.~
N
OC
•
a~
-~
a~
a~
U
>C
a~
0
U
L
U
.~
U
C
(0
U
W ~
O ~ C
O
i ~
W ~ N
'• ^~ CO
•"~ \°
O ~ ~
•O• O
Q V N
N
~ L v
Q •~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
Q U
~L
1..1.
U
C~
U
Ca
L
~--+
L
0
.~
0
U
•
(~
L
(~
N
M
~~
~~
U ~
O U)
r Q
o ~
~ c~
~ ~
U N
~ (~
~ ~
~ ~
U
.~
~L
~~
~~
U O
~ ~
•
•
C
O
~_
~ 0
t!1 ~ J ~ ~_
~ ~
~ O ~ ~
~ ~>
v1 :~,
~ ~ `~ ~ ~
C` a~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ c6 ~ ~
~ ~ J ~ c~
~ a > o
o L ~~ ~~Qm
o
o~ ~~o
V -~, ~~:~
v~~~ ~o.~
~ v.~~L ~
-~
o ~~ ~~
~~~~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~
z °' o ._ _
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ca
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ c~ o ~ ~
c~ ~ ~ ~ c o
~ ~~~// ~ cc~ ~ .~ ~ta
L LL W G L
c > J ~ ~~
~ o ~ ~
J C~ ~ ~ cn
U N
O ~ ~~
O '~ ~
O ~ ~ O
~Q U
~ ~, ~ o
~ Q~ ~
~ a~ ~ ~~
~ c
~ a~ a~ ~
~ ~ ~ o
~ cn
L ~ o ~ ~
o
~ U Ca ~
v NQ o
~ ~ ~ ~ c~
a~ ~ L ~
o ~ ~
_ ~ o
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~
~ O -~ v
~ ~ N ~
O L
~~ ~ ~
_ .~
~ o ~' ~
4~ C~ ~' ~
~ G ~ ~ L Q~
^~ ~ ~ +~-+ (a L
'U ~ ~ Q ~
~ .Q ~ U ~
O O O C~ U
U c~aU w Q
N
U
0
c~
U
U
a~
.~
0
a~
.U
0
a
a~
L
_o
Q
-~
U
~a
3
d
c
m
L
V
V
Q
m
E
0
x
d
0
d
0
U
O
~ ~
~--+ •.+
~--+
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~-_~ c~
~ O
~
~ U O
~ o ~
o ~,
~
~ o
~ ~ Q
Q
~ ~
~
N
~ ~ ~
O ~
Q U ~
~ ~ = o
o ~ o ~
~
. -
N
~ ~ ~ ~
o o
~ _
~ ~ ~
Q~
(~
~ ~ O
O `~
~ N ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
~ O
~
>
~,
~ ~ ~ ~
~' ~'
o
N ~ ~ ~
U
~ ~ ~ ~U
N ~ O ~
U N U p
~ ~ Q V
~
~ o a
~ ~ ~
~ U
},
}'
Q °
U ~ o
~ ~
0
O
U
Q
X
C6
a~
U
~~
Q N
c
O
c~
c
d
0
v
d
0
0
U
U
Q
L
~ ~
a~ ~
~--+
~ •~
~,
~~
~ L
~--~
0
Q
ca
~_
J
L
^~
L_l..
0
Q
G
~ N
~ ~ ~
L ~ Q Q
} I I
, o
W
_~
`~
U
L
0
2
0
2
L...
Q
U
C
O
_~
U
.;...a
0
2
C
N
W
O
^i...
I..L
a~
0
2
0
G
`~
U
c
m
E
as
a~
as
3
0
Y
V
Q
~--+
~--r
0
U
a~
.~
ca
o ~
~ ~
°~ O
~ ~
a~ ~
~ ~
STAFF REPORT
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Date: April 16, 2008
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director
By: Donna Vega, Redevelopment Analyst I
Subject: Discussion of the Armed Forces Banner Policy
P318
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council provides direction to staff on policy revisions for the Armed Forces Banner Program.
BACKGROUND
The Armed Forces Banner Program was implemented in November 2005 to honor and recognize the
contributions of military personnel that reside, or have an immediate family member that resides, in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. Under the current policy, eligibility for the banner program requires that
the honoree must be an active duty member of the armed forces. Since its inception, the Armed
Forces Banner Program has honored over 100 military personnel with banners displayed at 9 locations
along Foothill Blvd.
At the April 2, 2008 City Council meeting, Council Member Spagnolo suggested that the City Council
may be interested in displaying banners for military service personnel from Rancho Cucamonga who
have lost their lives in the war (under the current Armed Forces Banner Program there is no provision
for individuals who may have passed away while serving). The City Council then requested that staff
review the Armed Forces Banner Program policy and present the Council with any revisions that would
be required to allow the City to display banners for military personnel who have given their lives while
serving in the Iraq war.
POLICY
Based on the discussion and previous direction given at the April 2ntl City Council meeting, the following
sections of the Armed Forces Banner Program Policy would need to be revised to allow banners to be
displayed for military service personnel who have lost their lives in the war:
Eligibility Criteria:
The criteria currently states that the designated honoree must be an "active duty member of the
armed forces" in order to participate in the Armed Forces Banner Program.
The policy could be revised to include service people that "have given their life in service during the
most recent military conflict."
• Determination of Eligibility:
This section currently states that applicants must include "satisfactory documentation establishing
the name, armed services division, and active duty status of the person whose name is to appear
on the banner."
P319
DISCUSSION OF "1'f~ ARMED FORCES Btu\'NER POLICY PAGE 2
APRIL 16,2008
A clause could be added to this section stating that "banners for military personnel who have lost
their lives in the current military conflict will not require proof of active duty status."
• Display Terms:
An additional section could be added to the display terms stating that `Yhe banners for military
personnel who have lost their lives in the current military conflict will remain on display until the
Armed Forces Banner Program is discontinued or until the banner becomes damaged and requires
removal."
• Annual Eligibility Determination:
This section requires banner sponsors to submit an annual written verification that the service
person continues to meet the Eligibility Criteria.
A clause could be added to this section stating that "banner sponsors for military personnel who
have lost their lives in the current military conflict will not be required to submit annual eligibility
verification."
BANNER DESIGN
All of the armed forces banners currently on display have the same consistent design, which identifies
the name and military branch of the service person, and includes a Blue Star signifying that the service
person is on active duty status. The banner company vendor has indicated to staff that a new banner
design could be produced, which would distinguish the banners for deceased military personnel from
the banners that are currently used for active military personnel. The new banner design would have a
Gold Star in place of a Blue Star, which signifies that a service person has given his or her life while
serving the Country. It would also be possible for the phrase, "In Memory oP'to precede the individual's
name on the banner. There would be no additional charge required to provide the alternate design.
BANNER RELOCATION
In May 2008, the armed forces banners that are currently on display along Foothill Blvd. will be
relocated to Haven Ave. (between Civic Center Dr. and Lemon Ave.). All new armed forces banners
will continue to be installed along Haven Ave. until there are no available light poles, at which time
banners will be installed along Base Line Rd. near the Haven Ave. intersection. It is anticipated that this
relocation will unify the display to provide a more consistent street appearance, and also help protect
the banners from the harmful effects of the winds experienced in the east end of the city. A letter will
be sent to all of the Armed Forces Banner Program participants informing them of the change in
location. In addition, all future marketing materials for the program will identify the new banner location.
Respectfully Submitted,
~,~,m, ,v. ~r~
Linda D. Daniels
Redevelopment Director
Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Armed Forces Banner Sponsorship Program Policy
Exhibit "B" -Armed Forces Banner Graphics
P320
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ARMED FORCES BANNER
SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM POLICY
The City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City' sometimes herein) permits the display
of banners at specified locations, on City-owned property, within City rights of way,
and/or within other public rights of way subject to the City's control, on a first-come, first-
served basis pursuant to established policies. This display of armed forces banners is
permitted solely in conformance with this policy. In establishing this policy, the City does
not intend in any manner to create a public forum or other means by which non-
commercial, social, religious or political messages may be conveyed, or by which public
discourse, exchange of opinions or discussion on issues of any nature may occur.
Rather, the sole and limited purpose of the banner program is to recognize and honor
the contribution of active duty military personnel that reside in the City by permitting the
uniform display of banners containing the serviceperson's name and service division.
Consistent with the intent of the City, as expressed above, the City permits the
sponsorship and display of the armed forces banners solely in accordance with the
following policy:
Banner Sponsor Qualifications. Any person or organization can be a sponsor of a
banner.
Banner Printing -Military Serviceperson's Name and Division. The name (first and
last and suffix, if any) and American armed forces division (Army, Navy, Air Force,
Marines, Coast Guard) will be printed on the banner. A military serviceperson's name
cannot appear on more than one banner.
Eligibility Criteria. The designated honoree must be an active duty member of the
armed forces and a Rancho Cucamonga resident, or an immediate family member
(son/daughter, grandson/granddaughter, niece/nephew, son-in-law/daughter-in-law) of a
current Rancho Cucamonga resident.
Determination of Eligibility. The application must include a copy of a driver's license
or other picture identification satisfactory to the City, which shows the address of the
military service person, or his or her immediate family member's address as being in
Rancho Cucamonga. The application must also include satisfactory documentation
(e.g., military identification) establishing the name, armed services division, and active
duty status of the person whose name is to appear on the banner.
Display Term. A banner will be displayed continuously once it has been installed and
will be removed if
a. the banner becomes damaged due to wind, age, or other reasons as solely
determined by the City;
b. the military service person no longer meets the eligibility criteria
c. the sponsor of the banner fails to submit the annual verification that the
military service person continues to meet the Eligibility Criteria
P321
d. In the event the Armed Forces Banner Sponsorship Program is discontinued
for any reason in the discretion of the City Council
Annual Eligibility Determination. On an annual basis, the City will request from all
banner sponsors written verification that the service person continues to meet the
Eligibility Criteria. Banner sponsors will be contacted at their last known address listed
on their sponsorship application form. It shall be the responsibility of each banner
sponsor to promptly update his or her information on file with the City, as needed. The
City shall not be responsible in the event it does not receive any update information that
is not personally delivered to the banner representative or designee ("Banner
Representative"). Any banner no longer meeting the Eligibility Criteria shall be removed
and the location reassigned.
Application Process. Anyone wishing to sponsor a banner shall submit to the Banner
Representative a complete banner application on a form provided by the City, together
with the then-current application fee made payable to the City. The required fee has
been calculated to offset a portion of, but does not exceed, the costs of the personalized
banner, its installation and removal, and administration of the banner program. All
banner locations are assigned on a first-come, first-served basis. The number of, and
specific banner locations shall be determined solely by the City, and may be revised
without prior notice. A banner sponsor cannot select a specific location. Once all
available banner locations have been assigned, no further applications will be accepted.
Each applicant must provide information on the application form sufficient to investigate
and verify the facts stated and to determine whether the applicant satisfies the
requirements of this policy. Each complete application shall be approved or denied
within ten (10) business days of receipt. The City shall approve a banner application if a
location is available upon completion of the review, provided: (1) the applicant meets
all of the criteria set forth in this policy; (2) the applicant has provided all required
information and has been completely truthful.
Once an application is approved, there will be no refunds, even if a sponsor decides to
withdraw the application.
When an application is approved, the military serviceperson's name and armed forces
division will be printed on both sides of the banner which currently measures
approximately two feet by nine feet (2' by 9'). The lettering of the name and military
division shall be sized to fit the banner. No other information of any kind whatsoever,
including, but not limited to, rank, logos, photographs, graphics, telephone numbers, or
website addresses is permitted on a banner. The banner sponsor shall own the banner.
Approval of a banner application only entitles the banner sponsor's banner to be hung
and displayed by the City pursuant to this policy. The City shall have no obligation to
perform any maintenance to a banner or in conjunction with the display of any banner.
Once installed, a banner sponsor shall have no right of access to the banner provided,
however, that a banner sponsor may request the removal of the sponsor's banner.
Once removed following such request, the banner sponsor shall have no further rights
pursuant to this policy.
A banner can be sponsored at any time, provided a location is available. Unless
otherwise provided by the City Council, the installation of an Armed Forces Banner shall
occur in conjunction with the installation or removal of either the Holiday Banner
Program (Thanksgiving to New Years), or the Patriotic Banner Program (Memorial Day
to July 4`h), so long as these banner programs remain active.
P322
Neither the City nor the Agency shall be responsible for damage to or thefts of banners.
Furthermore, by applying for and receiving approval to sponsor a banner, each banner
sponsor agrees to indemnify and hold the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and each of City's and Agency's elected officials,
officers, employees, agents and volunteers free and harmless with respect to any and all
liabilities, claims, lawsuits and/or damages of any nature whatsoever that allegedly arise
from or are connected to the approval of the sponsor's banner application, including the
display of, and/or damage to or loss of any banner or banners.
In the event a banner must be replaced for any reason not due to the fault of a banner
sponsor, and so long as the Eligibility Criteria remains satisfied as established by
documentation provided by the banner sponsor, then upon payment of the City's banner
replacement fee, a new banner will be made and displayed, either at the original location
or alternative location as solely determined by the City. A banner sponsor shall have ten
(10) business days from the date of written notification by the City that a banner has
been removed, to request a replacement banner and submit the replacement fee and
required documentation. Thereafter, the banner sponsor shall be required to re-apply
and pay a new application fee.
The right to have a banner displayed pursuant to this policy may not be transferred or
assigned. If a banner is removed at the request of the banner sponsor, the banner
sponsor shall have no rights to replace the banner except as provided by re-applying for
a new banner.
The City reserves the right to revise this policy, discontinue the Armed Forces Banner
program, and/or revise applicable fees without prior notice. If the program is
discontinued, each banner will be returned to the sponsor thereof.
P323
EXHIBIT "B"
"Active Duty" "Fallen Soldier"
Armed Services Banner Armed Services Banner
w
v
0
w
O
0
N
.'..,
~~~'''
•--~ i-i
~ •~
~ ~ ~
''~
~ ~ •~
~ ~ r--~
~~ ~
O ~ ' ' ~ C~
0 ~ ~ ~
0 ~
~ ~
~ '~ ~ 4J
O ~ ~ ~ v ~
~ ~ ~ '~_ v O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
`/ • ,--~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _~
~ U ~,+~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-~ al's ~ ~ ~ o
Z
U
a
O
a
A
W
F
W
..
~4
N ~
~ •ti
~--+ ~
4--+ '~
O
,U
~ ~
.~
~ ~_
''d ."
~ ~
~ ~N
'~ ~
U
CCi ~
o~
~ .?
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
a.~ '~
O O^
~~
.~ o
~~
. ,.., ~ ~
..
c, ^ o ~
~'~; ~'~
~~ ~
~ ~° ~
,o ~
0
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
V ~ ~~
. .
0
0
. ^.,
e~
.~
a~
A
bA
~~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
.~ ~ ~_
~ ~ •~
~ ~ ? ^`'~
~ ~ ~
~ .~,, ~
O
.~ 0 '~ ~
~ ~ O~
ti
U c~ N ,?
~ O ~
O ' a~ '~ `~
~~ ~°o
~~ o~~
'~~ ~~'
o~
~ ,~ ~ •~
~ ~ ~~
^' O ~, ~
~~~ ~~
~~
~~ ~
~~
o ~ ,v
~ ~ ~~
~ ~ o
~~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
i '~ i
~ ~ ~
~ ..~ ,o ~,
~ ~ ~ ~
~a~ ~~
U~ ~ ~
r..~
O
z
0
V
a
0
a
A
W
H
W
L~
L7
..
A
~I
~' v.,
. ,.~ ~ ~
,-~ ~ • ~,
'~ v ~
~ ~
~, ~ o
~~ ~
~ '~'vo
~ ,~
~~ ~
~ ~ ~ •ti
a ~ ~ ~
'~ o ~ °~'
~ ~ ~
.~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~~~
~ ~~ ~
,O ~ ~ ~
bA }' ~
~ ~ ~~
a~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O
~ ~ ~ ~'~~
~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~~~
~ ~ ~ ~°~
o ~ ~ ~~
3 ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ o ~~~
a~ o ~ ~~~
~~ ~
~ ~ ~
I 'U ~ ~ I o ~
~ ti
~ ti ,~
V ~ ~ ~ ~ '~
..
O
.,..~
.~
A
~ ~
~ ,O
~ ,~ ~
c~
'~ ?
.~ ~ ~'
.~ o
~ ~, ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~° ~
3•~ ~ H
~ ~ ~~
~ ~
c~ U ° ~'
0
~ ' ~, y'~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ •~
~ ~ '^' ~
+~ ,~ N
v1 ~, ~ „~
~ ~ ~ o
~ ~ ~
0 0 0 ,
~~ ~~
Q, ~ ~ ti
~.~ ~~
~ ~ ~ o
~ o ~ ~
~4 ~ ~ ~
v I ~"~ I N
~ ~~ •~ ~
Lei 'U' ~ ~' ~
~ ~ ~ ~
V ~ ~ v
z
..
w
A
x
w
z
;~?
.,
-~
r,~
~4
~ V~
{~
~;~~~
i~b7
;~
...'
ti
O
.~
0
A
o~
w
v