Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout441 - Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. 441 AN ORDINANCE OF ~HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C~JCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMMqT DISTRICT ~ 90-02, TO AMMqD THE DEVELOPMMqT DISTRICTS MAP FREM "OP" OFFICE/PROFESSIONALTO 'W' (MM)ILMRESIDENEIAL, 8-14 DWRII.TNG UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 3.56 ACRES OF LAND, lOCATED AT ~HE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ~ AVMqI/E AND A. Recitals. (i) Pitassi/Dalmau Architects has filed an application for Development District Amendment 90-02 as described in the title of this OrdiDance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On August 22, 1990, the Planning C~Lu~Hssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Rasolution No. 90-107 reoa~mending that the application be approved and Resolution No. 90-108 rec~memitng to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 90-01B be approved. (iii) On September 19, and continued to November 21, 1990, and February 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidenc~ presented to this Council during the above-refer~ public hearing on Septenber 19, and continued to November 21, 1990 and Fe_hnmry 20, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) Tne application applies to approximately 3.56 acres of land, basically a rectangular oonfiglxration, located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as "OP" (Office/Professional); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated "U' (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling unite per acre) and is developed with single family residence~ and a church. The property to the west is designated "U' (Low R~sidential, 2-4 dwelling unite per acre) and is developed with Ordinance No. 441 Page 2 single family residences. The property to the east is designated ,W, (Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with residential Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with residential apartments and is partially undeveloped; and (c) This amendment does not conflict with the T~nd Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related develoiment; and (d) This amendment does ~ the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amerament would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjaoent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrouraing properties and that issuance of a Negative Declaration is rec~:,,:ended. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed DeveloImBnt District in terms of access and size, as evidenced by the site's eceeding the City's minimum lot size requirements, and cc~patibility with existing surrounding land uses, as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the east and south by parcels of land with the same land use designation; and (b) That the proposed ~t would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Environmental Study and the implementation of mitigation agreements between the property owner and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District and the Central School District; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and Develo~ Code due to the site's capacity to promote the goals and objectives for residential develoIm~nt. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in cc~pliance with the California Envirormental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby approves the issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the fintirr3s and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby ordains that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ~, on this 20th day of Fe_hruary 1991, of Development District Amendment 90-02 and changing the district designation Ordinance No. 441 Page 3 from "OP" (Office/Professional) to 'W' (Medium 8-14 dwellin~ units per acre) for 3.56 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street, as depicted in the attached Exhibit "1." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to tb~ adoption of this Ordinance. 7. Tne Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Ranc_ho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APE, and ADOPlOD this 6th day of March, 1991. AYES: Alexar~er, Buquet, Stout, Williams, Wright NOES: None Dennis L. Stout, Mayor city I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY cT.N~K of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoin~ Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 20th day of February, 1991, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamcnga held on tba 6th day of March, 1991. Executed this 7th day of March, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~s, City Clerk Ordinance No. 441 Page 4