Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout431 - Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. 431 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-03 TO ADJUST THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF SUBAREA 8 ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE NORTHERLY 330 FEET, WESTERLY 1,065 FEET, AND SOUTHERLY 330 FEET TO ITS PRESENT BOUNDARY WITH SUBAREA 7; DELETION OF 'THE PLANNED EXTENSION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN ROCHESTER AND MILLIKEN AVENUES; AND THE REALIGNMENT OF A PORTION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recital s. {i} The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 90-03 (ISPA 90-03) as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." {ii} On September 12, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 90-116, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. g0-03. {iii) On October 3, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Ordinance. {iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in sections I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: Ordinance No. 431 Page 2 (a) The application relating to the Subarea 8 boundary adjustment applies to approximately 8 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, approximately 1,300 feet north of Arrow Highway and is presently undeveloped with existing vineyards. Said property is currently designated as Subarea 7; and {b} The property to the north, east, and west of the subarea adjustment is designated Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 7 and is undeveloped with existing vineyards. The property to the south is designated Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 8 and is undeveloped with existing vineyards. {c} The application relating to the deletion of the Day Creek Boulevard extension applies to approximately .73 miles of planned roadway between Rochester and Milliken Avenues; and the realignment of Day Creek Boulevard applies to approximately .25 miles on the east side of Rochester Avenue. (d) This Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and {e} That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access and size, as evidenced by the findings and conclusions of the Initial Study traffic analysis; and ' {f} That the proposed Amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions, findings, and mitigation measures of the Initial Environmental Study; and {g} That the proposed Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan due to the site's capacity to promote the goals and objectives for development of a park in the location proposed in each document. SECTION 4: Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in sections 1, 2, and 3 above, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 90-03 to change the subarea boundaries and circulation system as follows: {a) Adjust the northern boundary of Subarea 8 on the west aide of Rochester Avenue northerly 330 feet, westerly 1,065 feet and southerly 330 feet to its present boundary with Subarea 7; and (b) Delete the planned extension of Day Creek Boulevard between Rochester and Milliken Avenues; and Ordinance No. 431 Page 3 (c) Realign the portion of Day Creek Boulevard, east of Rochester Avenue, mid-way between its planned location and Arrow Highway. SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen {15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 1990. AYES: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Stout, Wright NOES: None ABSENT: None ~~y~~){~ ·~nnis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 3rd day of October, 1990, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day of October, 1990. Executed this 18th day of October, 1990 at Rancho Cucamonga, Cal i forni a. *D~bra J. Aq[a~fis, City Clerk"